2013 Annual Report Bruker Corporation Innovation with Integrity 4/7/14 6:20 PM 40639cvr.indd 1,1 Bruker Corporation Dear Fellow Bruker Shareholders, In the past 20 months, Bruker has embarked on a dual strategy of continued innovation, combined with a bold, multi-year transformation process designed to take the Company from ‘good to great’. During 2013, Bruker took important steps to strengthen its founda- tion, and better position the Company to improve its operational performance. Innovation & Transformation Bruker has long been known for technological innova- tion, high-performance products, market leadership, and a strong commitment to our customers’ success. These strengths have helped establish Bruker as a highly respected brand in scientific instrumenta- tion for life science research, pharma, industrial and applied markets, and more recently for the clinical research market. This commitment to innovation has led to exceptional organic revenue growth over many years and an attractive return on invested capital. In 2013, we made a concerted effort to improve other aspects of Bruker’s performance in order to achieve better balance in our financial results. We implement- ed significant organizational changes and initiatives that will better position the Company to expand its margins, and to drive higher levels of profitability and cash flow in the future. We believe that further improvements to our profitability and cash flows are not only good for shareholder value, but they will also ensure that we have the ability to invest in many of Bruker’s attractive growth opportunities. These investments include expanding into adjacent markets where we can leverage our technology platforms. Over the next several years, Bruker intends to transform its operational performance, while stay- ing true to its mission as a best-in-class innovator of high-performance scientific instruments that brings significant value to our global customer base. We are taking decisive steps to improve our operational and financial performance. While our 2013 financial per- formance did not yet reflect the impact from all of the changes we are making, we have taken major steps to strengthen Bruker’s organization and leadership team, to improve our processes and systems, and to implement restructuring, outsourcing, lean manufac- turing, and other efficiency programs. Organization & Leadership We have strengthened our organization and lead- ership team by organizing ten Bruker Scientific (BSI) divisions into three operating Groups: Bruker BioSpin, Bruker MAT and Bruker CALID, each Group with over $500 million in annual revenue. This new organizational structure enables us to more efficiently manage Bruker, and is expected to drive higher levels of operational efficiency over time. We also made important changes to our executive team to help lead Bruker in this transformation. All three Group Presi- dents and our Chief Financial Officer have proven track records in our industry, and all were appointed to their current positions since mid-2012, with the last member of our senior leadership team joining us in August 2013. During 2013, we made changes to our incentive compensation system, which will take effect in 2014. These modifications will help us to drive change at Bruker, while helping to create value for employ- ees and shareholders. We will now have a higher percentage of our variable compensation depend on annual improvements in Bruker’s gross margins, op- erating margins, and working capital ratios. We have also implemented a broader equity incentive plan to enhance management alignment with sharehold- ers. Driving innovation and above industry-average revenue growth remains a major objective of our Company. However, we are putting incentives and initiatives in place to make this growth more profit- able and to sustain Bruker’s long-term competitive position. Processes & Systems Due to the global scale of Bruker, we have begun to make changes to our business processes and systems in order to establish more consistent global operating standards throughout the Company. One of the most significant changes we made during 2013 was to transition Bruker to a global business model, from a previous model that was more based on coun- tries and legal entities. This change now provides our Group and Division Presidents global decision rights over their businesses and creates greater account- ability for resource allocation and operational results. We are also establishing new, more integrated strat- egy, budgeting and management processes, as well as financial and IT systems to provide greater visibility and control over the business. These investments include rolling out a new financial consolidation sys- tem in 2014 to help us more efficiently consolidate the financial results of the Company. Over time, we will also take steps to upgrade and harmonize our en- terprise resource planning (ERP) systems, which will allow us to put better information in the hands of our managers and make more informed decisions about our resource allocation. Moreover, we have acceler- ated the adoption of customer relationship manage- ment (CRM) systems in our three Groups. 40639letter.indd 1 4/7/14 6:16 PM 2014 Outlook Turning to our outlook for 2014, we expect reported revenue growth of 3% to 4%, as academic, clini- cal, government, and life-science research markets remain healthy. We are cautious about industrial demand until we see a more meaningful rebound, but we expect that all three of our Bruker Scientific Instruments segment Groups will grow in 2014. On the bottom-line, we expect to drive healthy expansion of our non-GAAP operating margins and 10% to 14% non-GAAP earnings per share growth in 2014. The primary drivers of this improvement will come from the many initiatives that we implemented in 2013, and from exciting new products that we launched in 2012 and 2013. I will conclude my comments by stating that I am excited about the future of Bruker. We will continue to focus on driving innovation and shaping our mar- kets, while transforming Bruker into a well-balanced, ‘great’ Company over the next few years. I believe we can enable the discoveries and innovations of our customers, and drive their productivity and success, while also creating shareholder value through profit- able growth, higher earnings and cash flow. I want to thank our valued customers, our Bruker col- leagues, our shareholders, and our collaboration and business partners for their commitment and support, and I am looking forward to reporting on our further progress. Sincerely, Frank H. Laukien, Ph.D. Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer April 16, 2014 NOTE: We reference certain non-GAAP measures in our shareholder letter. A reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to our reported GAAP results can be found at the end of this report. Bruker Corporation Restructuring & Productivity Over the past year, we completed selected dives- titures and launched outsourcing, lean manufactur- ing and restructuring initiatives in nearly all of our businesses. These actions are part of our concerted efforts to lower our costs and to set the stage for margin expansion, working capital ratio reductions, and free cash flow improvements. Many of these programs are aimed at lowering costs in our produc- tion facilities and supply chain. For example, during 2013 we announced programs to close production fa- cilities, outsource manufacturing activities, and divest non-core product lines. We expect these and other programs to drive approximately $15 to $20 million of annualized savings during 2014 and beyond. In addition to these programs, we carefully managed our operating expenditures throughout 2013 and reduced our operating spending, despite the under- lying growth in our business. We expect to launch additional restructuring and productivity initiatives in 2014 and 2015, which will be key components of our multi-year effort to generate higher margins and cash flows. Financial Performance Bruker reported revenues of $1.84 billion in 2013, which represented organic revenue growth of 3.2% compared to 2012. Despite low single-digit growth in the life-science tools market, our BioSpin Group grew in the high-single digits and our CALID Group in the mid-single digits, while our BMAT Group declined in the high-single digits in 2013 due to weaker industrial markets. Our profitability fell short of our goals, as non-GAAP earnings per share (EPS) declined from $0.83 in 2012 to $0.77 in 2013. In addition to reduced profitability in our BMAT Group as a result of weak industrial de- mand, a significant portion of our profitability decline came from changes in foreign exchange rates, which reduced our non-GAAP operating margins by more than 100 basis points in 2013 year-over-year. We also faced a decline in one-time license revenues, which fell from $16 million in 2012 to $6 million in 2013. Our free cash flow increased $34 million year-over- year to $95 million in 2013, and our return on invested capital (non-GAAP ROIC) of 20.0% remained strong. We achieved reductions in our operating expenses, yet Bruker continued to invest 10.4% of revenue into research & development in 2013. This invest- ment reflects our continued commitment to market leadership, organic revenue growth and high ROIC. Our balance sheet remains solid and we ended the year 2013 with net cash of $84 million, while goodwill represented only 6.4% of our total assets. 40639letter.indd 2 4/7/14 6:16 PM UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 Form 10-K (cid:2) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT of 1934 (cid:3) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 Commission File Number 000-30833 BRUKER CORPORATION (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation or organization) 40 Manning Road, Billerica, MA (Address of principal executive offices) 04-3110160 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 01821 (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (978) 663-3660 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share The Nasdaq Global Select Market Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes (cid:2) No (cid:3) Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes (cid:3) No (cid:2) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes (cid:2) No (cid:3) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes (cid:2) No (cid:3) Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. (cid:3) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of ‘‘large accelerated filer,’’ ‘‘accelerated filer’’ and ‘‘smaller reporting company’’ in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act: Large accelerated filer (cid:2) Accelerated filer (cid:3) Non-accelerated filer (cid:3) Smaller reporting company (cid:3) (do not check if smaller reporting company) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes (cid:3) No (cid:2) The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2013 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was $1,761,091,576, based on the reported last sale price on the Nasdaq Global Select Market. This amount excludes an aggregate of 58,090,773 shares of common stock held by officers and directors and each person known by the registrant to own 10% or more of the outstanding common stock of the registrant as of June 30, 2013. Exclusion of shares held by any person should not be construed to indicate that such person possesses the power, direct or indirect, to direct or cause the direction of management or policies of the registrant, or that such person is controlled by or under common control with the registrant. The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding as of February 20, 2014 was 167,611,844. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Portions of the information required by Part III of this report (Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14) are incorporated by reference from the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed within 120 days of the close of the registrant’s fiscal year. BRUKER CORPORATION ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K TABLE OF CONTENTS Part I Item 1 Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 1A Risk Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 1B Unresolved Staff Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 2 Legal Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 3 Mine Safety Disclosure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 4 Part II Item 5 Item 6 Item 7 Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selected Financial Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Financial Statements and Supplementary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 8 Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Auditing and Financial Item 9 Disclosure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 9A Controls and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 9B Other Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Part III Item 10 Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Executive Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 11 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Item 12 Stockholder Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Principal Accounting Fees and Services Page 3 21 35 35 37 38 39 41 42 64 67 113 113 115 116 116 116 117 117 Exhibits, Financial Statements and Schedules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Signatures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118 122 Any statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Without limiting the foregoing, the words believes, anticipates, plans, expects, seeks, estimates, should and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statements contained herein are based on current expectations, but are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. The factors that could cause actual future results to differ materially from current expectations include, but are not limited to, the outcome of any actions that may be taken by government agencies in connection with FCPA compliance matters that we have reported to them, risks and uncertainties related to adverse changes in the economic and political conditions in the countries in which we operate, the integration of businesses we have acquired or may acquire in the future, changing technologies, product development and market acceptance of our products, the cost and pricing of our products, manufacturing, competition, dependence on collaborative partners and key suppliers, capital spending and government funding policies, changes in governmental regulations, intellectual property rights, litigation, exposure to foreign currency 1 Item 13 Item 14 Part IV Item 15 fluctuations and other factors, many of which are described in more detail in this Annual Report on Form 10-K under Item 1A. ‘‘Risk Factors’’ and from time to time in other filings we may make with the Securities and Exchange Commission. While the Company may elect to update forward-looking statements in the future, it specifically disclaims any obligation to do so, even if the Company’s estimates change, and readers should not rely on those forward-looking statements as representing the Company’s views as of any date subsequent to the date of the filing of this report. References to ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ ‘‘our,’’ ‘‘management’’ or the ‘‘Company’’ refer to Bruker Corporation and, in some cases, its subsidiaries, as well as all predecessor entities. Our principal executive offices are located at 40 Manning Road, Billerica, MA 01821, and our telephone number is (978) 663-3660. Information about Bruker Corporation is available at www.bruker.com. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into and does not form a part of this report. All trademarks, trade names or copyrights referred to in this report are the property of their respective owners. 2 ITEM 1 BUSINESS Our Business PART I We are a designer and manufacturer of proprietary life science and materials research systems and associated products that address the rapidly evolving needs of a diverse array of customers in life science, pharmaceutical, biotechnological, clinical and molecular diagnostics research, and materials and chemical analysis in various industries and government applications. Our technology platforms include magnetic resonance technologies, mass spectrometry technologies, gas chromatography technologies, X-ray technologies, spark-optical emission spectroscopy, atomic force microscopy, stylus and optical metrology technology, and infrared and Raman molecular spectroscopy technologies. We manufacture and distribute a broad range of field analytical systems for chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear and explosives, or CBRNE, detection. We also design, manufacture and market high and low temperature superconducting materials and devices based primarily on metallic low temperature superconductors. Our corporate headquarters are located in Billerica, Massachusetts. We maintain major technical and manufacturing centers in Europe, North America, and Japan, and we have sales offices located throughout the world. Strategy and Competitive Strengths Our business strategy is to capitalize on our ability to innovate and generate above market revenue growth, both organically and through acquisitions. Our strategy also includes improving our gross margins and effectively leveraging our research and development, sales, marketing and distribution investments, and general and administrative expenses with the goal of enhancing our operating margins and improve our earnings in the future. Our key competitive strengths include our: (cid:127) broad product and service offerings in the markets we serve; (cid:127) commitment to innovative, reliable, and performance-leading products and solutions for our customers; (cid:127) premier global brands; (cid:127) extensive intellectual property portfolio; and (cid:127) global manufacturing, distribution, and logistics networks. Business Segments We are organized into four operating segments: the Bruker BioSpin Group, the Bruker CALID Group, the Bruker MAT Group, and Bruker Energy & Supercon Technologies division. The Bruker BioSpin Group combines the Bruker Magnetic Resonance and Preclinical Imaging divisions and designs, manufactures and distributes enabling life science tools based on magnetic resonance and preclinical imaging technologies. Bruker BioSpin sells various systems utilizing magnetic resonance technology, including magnetic resonance imaging systems (MRI), nuclear magnetic resonance systems (NMR) and electron paramagnetic resonance systems, as well as OEM MRI magnets to medical device manufacturers. Bruker BioSpin’s preclinical imaging division sells single and multiple modality systems using MRI, position emission tomography (PET), single photon emission tomography (SPECT), computed tomography (CT), magnetic particle imaging (MPI) and optical imaging (fluorescence and bioluminescence) technologies to preclinical markets. 3 The Bruker CALID Group combines the Bruker Life Sciences and Clinical, Bruker Chemical and Applied Markets (CAM), Bruker Detection and Bruker Optics divisions. The Bruker CALID Group designs, manufactures and distributes life science mass spectrometry instruments that can be integrated and used along with other sample preparation or chromatography instruments, as well as Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear and Explosive (CBRNE) detection products and instruments based on Raman molecular spectroscopy technologies. Bruker CALID’s mass spectrometry units are typically used in applications of expression proteomics, clinical proteomics, metabolic and peptide biomarker profiling, drug discovery and development, molecular diagnostics research, molecular and systems biology, and basic molecular medicine research and clinical microbiology (for research use only outside the European Union). The Bruker MAT Group combines the Bruker AXS, Bruker Nano Surfaces, Bruker Nano Analytics and Bruker Elemental divisions and designs, manufactures and distributes spectroscopy and microscopy instruments for the analysis of composition and structure in material science and life science samples. The instruments are based on advanced technologies in X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF), X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray micro computed tomography ((cid:1)CT), atomic force microscopy (AFM), stylus and optical metrology (SOM) and fluorescence microscopy (FM), and also include analytical tools for electron microscopes, handheld, portable and mobile X-ray fluorescence, and spark optical emission spectroscopy systems. The Bruker Energy & Supercon Technologies (BEST) division develops and produces low temperature superconductor and high temperature superconductor materials for use in advanced magnet technology and energy applications as well as linear accelerators, accelerator cavities, insertion devices, other accelerator components and specialty superconducting magnets for physics and energy research and a variety of other scientific applications. For financial reporting purposes, we combine the Bruker BioSpin, Bruker CALID and Bruker MAT operating segments into the Scientific Instruments reporting segment because each has similar economic characteristics, product processes and services, types and classes of customers, methods of distribution and regulatory environments. As such, our management reports its financial results based on the following segments: (cid:127) Bruker Scientific Instruments (BSI). The operations of this segment include the design, manufacture and distribution of advanced instrumentation and automated solutions based on magnetic resonance technology, mass spectrometry technology, gas chromatography technology, X-ray technology, spark-optical emission spectroscopy technology, atomic force microscopy technology, stylus and optical metrology technology, and infrared and Raman molecular spectroscopy technology. Typical customers of the BSI segment include: pharmaceutical, biotechnology and molecular diagnostic companies; academic institutions, medical schools and other non-profit organizations; clinical microbiology laboratories; government departments and agencies; nanotechnology, semiconductor, chemical, cement, metals and petroleum companies; and food, beverage and agricultural analysis companies and laboratories. (cid:127) Bruker Energy & Supercon Technologies (BEST). The operations of this segment include the design, manufacture and marketing of superconducting materials, primarily metallic low temperature superconductors, for use in magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear magnetic resonance, fusion energy research and other applications, and ceramic high temperature superconductors primarily for energy technology and magnet research applications. We also design, manufacture and market normal and superconducting linear accelerators and radio frequency cavities and systems, as well as synchrotron and beamline instrumentation. Typical customers of the BEST segment include companies in the medical industry, private and public research and development laboratories in the fields of fundamental and applied sciences and energy research, academic institutions and government agencies. 4 BSI Segment The Bruker BioSpin Group designs, manufactures and distributes enabling life science tools based on magnetic resonance technology. Magnetic resonance is a natural phenomenon occurring when a molecule placed in a magnetic field gives off a signature radio frequency. The signature radio frequency is characteristic of the particular molecule and provides a multitude of precise chemical and structural information. Depending on the intended application, we market and sell to our customers a NMR, or an electron paramagnetic resonance system (EPR). Bruker BioSpin also offers high-field OEM MRI magnets to medical device manufacturers. Bruker BioSpin’s preclinical imaging division manufactures and sells single and multiple modality systems using MRI, PET, SPECT, CT, MPI and optical imaging technologies to preclinical markets. Bruker BioSpin’s products, which have particular application in structural proteomics, drug discovery, research and food and materials science fields, provide customers with the ability to determine the structure, dynamics, and function of specific molecules, such as proteins, and to characterize and determine the composition of mixtures. The vast majority of Bruker BioSpin’s revenues are generated by academic and government customers. Other customers include pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, nonprofit laboratories, as well as chemical, food and beverage, and polymer companies. The Bruker CALID Group primarily designs, manufactures and distributes life-science mass spectrometry instruments that can be integrated and used along with other sample preparation or chromatography instruments. These products are used in both research and clinical diagnostic settings. Mass spectrometers are sophisticated devices that measure the mass or weight of a molecule and can provide accurate information on the identity, quantity, and primary structure of molecules. Mass spectrometry based solutions often combine advanced mass spectrometry instrumentation, automated sampling and sample preparation robots, reagent kits and other disposable products used in conducting tests, or assays, and bioinformatics software. We offer mass spectrometry systems and integrated solutions for applications in multiple existing and emerging life-science markets and chemical and applied markets, including expression proteomics, clinical proteomics, metabolic and peptide biomarker profiling, drug discovery and development, molecular diagnostics research and molecular and systems biology, as well as basic molecular medicine research and clinical microbiology (for research use only outside the European Union). We also supply various systems based on mass spectrometry, ion mobility spectrometry, infrared spectroscopy and radiological/nuclear detectors for CBRNE detection in emergency response, homeland security and defense applications. As part of our Bruker Optics division, Bruker CALID also manufactures and distributes research, analytical and process analysis instruments and solutions based on infrared and Raman molecular spectroscopy technologies. These products are utilized in industry, government, and academia for a wide range of applications and solutions for life science, pharmaceutical, food and agricultural analysis, quality control and process analysis applications. Infrared and Raman spectroscopy are widely used in both research and industry as simple, rapid, nondestructive and reliable techniques for applications ranging from basic sample identification and quality control to advanced research. Bruker CALID utilizes Fourier transform and dispersive Raman measurement techniques on an extensive range of laboratory and process spectrometers. The Bruker CALID Group’s products are complemented by a wide range of sampling accessories and techniques, which include microanalysis, high-throughput screening, and many others, to help users find suitable solutions to analyze their samples effectively. Customers of our Bruker CALID Group include pharmaceutical, biotechnology, diagnostics companies, academic institutions, medical schools, nonprofit or for-profit forensics, food and beverage safety, environmental and clinical microbiology laboratories, and government departments and agencies. The Bruker MAT Group designs, manufactures and distributes advanced X-ray instruments that use electromagnetic radiation with extremely short wavelengths to determine the characteristics of matter and the three-dimensional structure of molecules. The Bruker MAT product portfolio comprises 5 instruments based on X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF), X-ray diffraction, (XRD) and X-ray micro computed tomography ((cid:1)CT). Bruker MAT’s products also include atomic force microscopy instrumentation (AFM). Such instruments provide atomic or near atomic resolution of surface topography and mechanical, electrical and chemical information using nano scale probes. In addition, the Bruker MAT Group provides advanced fluorescence optical microscopy instruments for multi- photon and for multipoint confocal studies in life science. Also, Bruker MAT provides non-contact nanometer resolution topography through white light interferometry and stylus profilometry. Bruker MAT also manufactures and markets analytical tools for electron microscopes, including energy- dispersive X-ray spectrometers (EDS), electron backscatter diffraction systems (EBSD) and (cid:1)CT accessories, as well as mobile and bench-top micro X-ray fluorescence ((cid:1)XRF) and total reflection X-ray fluorescence spectrometers (TXRF). Additionally, Bruker MAT manufactures and distributes handheld, portable and mobile X-ray fluorescence (HMP-XRF), spectrometry instruments and spark optical emission spectroscopy systems (spark-OES) used to analyze the concentration of elements in metallic samples. The Bruker MAT product portfolio also includes carbon, sulfur, oxygen, nitrogen and hydrogen, or CS/ONH, analyzers based on combustion or heat extraction with infrared and thermal conductivity technology. Using modular platforms, we often combine our technology applications with sample preparation tools, automation, consumables, and data analysis software. These products provide customers with the ability to determine the three-dimensional structure of specific molecules, such as proteins, and to characterize and determine the composition of materials down to the dimensions used in nanotechnology. Customers of our Bruker MAT Group include biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, nanotechnology companies, semiconductor companies, raw material manufacturers, chemical companies, academic institutions, governmental customers and other businesses involved in materials analysis. BEST Segment BEST, designs, manufactures and distributes superconducting materials, primarily metallic low temperature superconductors, for use in magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear magnetic resonance, fusion energy research and other applications. BEST also develops, manufactures and markets ceramic, second generation high temperature superconductors for energy technology and magnet research applications. Additionally, BEST develops, manufactures and markets sophisticated devices and complex tools based primarily on metallic low temperature superconductors that have applications in ‘‘big science’’ research, including radio frequency accelerator cavities and modules, power couplers and linear accelerators. BEST also manufactures and sells non-superconducting high technology tools, such as synchrotron and beamline instrumentation, principally to customers engaged in materials research and ‘‘big science’’ research projects. Additionally, BEST offers non-superconducting CuponalTM materials and wires, based on co-extruded copper and aluminum, used in the power and transportation industries. Products and Solutions We believe that our products and solutions offer the following advantages to our customers: (cid:127) high performance and precision; (cid:127) integrated solutions for specific applications; (cid:127) reliability and increased productivity; (cid:127) high-quality results; and (cid:127) cost-efficiency. 6 BSI Segment Bruker BioSpin Products Bruker BioSpin magnetic resonance systems integrate a radio frequency source and transmitter, one or more sensitive detectors, a magnet sized for the particular application, and operating and analysis software to acquire and analyze radio frequency signatures that are given off when a molecule is placed in a magnetic field. Bruker BioSpin preclinical imaging systems use single or multiple modalities from our technology portfolio comprising MRI, PET, SPECT, CT, MPI and optical imaging. These systems address many of the matter characterization needs of the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries and also have applications in advanced materials research, materials analysis and quality control. During 2013, we launched a number of new products and technologies in the Bruker BioSpin Group, including Ascend Aeon products, superconducting, nitrogen-free magnet systems some of which do not require liquid helium refills, and the world’s first MPI system for preclinical imaging as a complementary technique for disease studies, translational research and drug discovery. We also launched a new release of WineScreener, a high-resolution Fourier transform nuclear magnetic resonance (FT-NMR) based screening system and made a number of extensions to our Assure NMR solutions and Avance console architecture. Bruker BioSpin Group’s instruments are based on the following technology platforms: (cid:127) NMR—Nuclear magnetic resonance; (cid:127) MRI—Magnetic resonance imaging; (cid:127) EPR—Electron paramagnetic resonance; (cid:127) MPI—Magnetic Particle Imaging; (cid:127) PET—Positron Emission Tomography; (cid:127) SPECT—Single Photon Emission Tomography; (cid:127) CT—Computed Tomography; and (cid:127) OI—Optical Imaging (fluorescence and bioluminescence). NMR is a qualitative and quantitative analytical technique that is used to determine the molecular structure and purity of a sample. Molecules are placed in a magnetic field and give off a radio frequency, or rf, signature that is recorded by a sensitive detector. Analysis software helps to determine the molecular structure of the sample. The NMR technique is used in academia, pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, and by other industrial users in life science and material science research. MRI is a process of creating an image from the manipulation of hydrogen atoms in a magnetic field. In the presence of an external magnetic field, atoms will align with or against the external magnetic field. Application of a radio frequency causes the atoms to jump between high and low energy states. MRI and magnetic resonance spectroscopy, or MRS, include many methods including diffusion- weighted, perfusion-weighted, molecular imaging and contrast-enhance. MRI offers high resolution morphologic information, as well as functional, metabolic or molecular information. Customers use our MRI systems in pharmaceutical research, including metabolomics, to study a number of diseases, including diabetes, neurology, oncology and cardiovascular disorders. EPR is a process of absorption of microwave radiation by paramagnetic ions or molecules with at least one unpaired electron that spins in the presence of a static magnetic field. EPR detects unpaired electrons unambiguously, whereas other techniques can only provide indirect evidence of their presence. In addition, EPR can identify the paramagnetic species that are detected, which present information on the molecular structure near the unpaired electron and give insight into dynamic 7 processes such as molecular motions or fluidity. Our EPR instruments are used for a wide range of applications, including advanced materials research, materials analysis and quality control. MPI is a process of creating an image from magnetic particles administered to the body of an animal. The magnetic particles are manipulated in a combination of oscillating magnetic fields exhibiting a field free zone. The response of the particles allows a real time 3D data set acquisition of the whole body of an animal, showing the contrast agent distributing in and flowing through the body. This imaging modality is used to detect cardiovascular disorders. PET is a process of creating an image from positrons after administration of a positron emitting radionuclide to the body of an animal. Annihilation of the positron produces two photons which show an angle of 180(cid:4) between them and by this distinguishes these photons from photons originating from other sources. The PET tracer enriches in certain regions of interest within the body and gains molecular information from the animal in vivo. This has widespread applications, most importantly for oncology, inflammation, neurology and cardiovascular disorders, as well as metabolic disease, drug discovery and bone disease. SPECT uses a contrast agent containing radionuclides which directly emit single photons. The contrast agent enriches in certain parts of the body of an animal and generates images of the radionuclide distribution in the body. SPECT has widespread application in animal investigations in vivo, most importantly in oncology, neurology and cardiovascular disorders. CT is a technology based on X-rays which are used to generate a complete 3D data set. The most important applications are tissue sample analysis or non-invasive in vivo animal imaging. CT offers the highest spatial resolution of all preclinical imaging modalities and is especially useful to generate morphological information of the object or animal under investigation. CT is being used in all fields of preclinical investigations such as bone-orthopedics, cardiovascular, pulmonary, oncology, metabolism and others. OI is a process of creating an image from light emitted from within the body of an animal in vivo. This is achieved by administration of a fluorescent imaging agent and corresponding activation of fluorescence via an external light source, or fluorescence imaging. Alternatively, it is possible to manipulate the animal under investigation such that it contains molecules which emit light without external irradiation, or bioluminescence imaging. Optical imaging is a very sensitive imaging technology used for generating molecular information in an investigation. The main fields of application are oncology, neurology, inflammation, stem cell research and bone and infectious diseases. Bruker CALID Group Products The Bruker CALID mass spectrometry instruments address a wide range of life sciences applications. Mass spectrometry is the method of choice for protein primary structure analysis, including the determination of amino acid sequence and post-translational modifications and protein quantification. As a result, mass spectrometry is an enabling technology of the expression proteomics laboratory. Mass spectrometers are also increasingly used for the discovery of peptide, protein, or metabolite biomarkers and panels or patterns of biomarkers. These biomarkers can be used for toxicity screening or to assess drug efficacy in pre-clinical trials in pharmaceutical drug development. They are also used in clinical research and validation studies in the emerging field of protein molecular diagnostics. Bruker CALID’s research, analytical and process analysis instruments are used in both research and industry as simple, rapid, nondestructive and reliable techniques for applications ranging from basic sample identification and quality control to advanced research. The spectrometry product line is complemented by a range of sampling accessories and techniques to help users find the best solution to analyze samples effectively. During 2013, we launched a number of new mass spectrometry and chromatography products, including three quadrupole time-of-flight systems (compact, impact HD and maXis HD) ideally suited for small molecule characterization, screening applications, bottom-up 8 proteomics, and top-down proteomic analysis and the characterization of biopharmaceuticals, an ultra- sensitive inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer for trace elemental detection and a new high-performance liquid chromatography triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. We also expanded the Fourier transform mass spectrometry (FTMS) product line, with the introduction of the solariX XR. The Bruker CALID Group’s instruments are based on the following technology platforms: (cid:127) MALDI-TOF—Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, including tandem time-of-flight systems (MALDI-TOF/TOF); (cid:127) ESI-TOF—Electrospray ionization time-of-flight spectrometry, including tandem mass spectrometry systems based on ESI-quadrupole-TOF mass spectrometry (ESI-Q-q-TOF); (cid:127) FTMS—Fourier transform mass spectrometry, including hybrid systems with a quadrupole front end (Q-q-FTMS); (cid:127) ITMS—Ion trap mass spectrometry; (cid:127) GC—Gas chromatography; (cid:127) GC-MS—Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry systems utilizing single or triple-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry; (cid:127) LC-MS—Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry systems utilizing triple-quadrupole time-of flight mass spectrometry; (cid:127) ICP-MS—Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry; (cid:127) FT-IR—Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy; (cid:127) NIR—Near-infrared spectroscopy; and (cid:127) Raman—Raman spectroscopy. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometers utilize an ionization process to analyze solid samples using a laser that combines high sample throughput with high mass range and sensitivity. Our MALDI-TOF mass spectrometers are particularly useful for applications in clinical diagnostics, environmental and taxonomical research, and food processing and quality control. Specific applications include: oligonucleotide and synthetic polymer analysis; protein identification and quantification; peptide de novo sequencing; determination of post-translational modifications of proteins; interaction proteomics and protein function analysis; drug discovery and development; and fast body fluid and tissue peptide or protein biomarker detection. MALDI mass spectrometry allows users to classify and identify microorganisms quickly and reliably with minimal sample preparation efforts and life cycle costs. Our MALDI Biotyper solution enables identification, taxonomical classification, or dereplication of microorganisms like bacteria, yeasts, and fungi. We have been selling the MALDI Biotyper in Europe for the past five years. In 2013, we were granted clearance by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to market our MALDI Biotyper for the identification of Gram negative bacterial colonies cultured from human specimens. ESI-TOF mass spectrometers utilize an electrospray ionization process to analyze liquid samples. This ionization process, which does not dissociate the molecules, allows for rapid data acquisition and analysis of large biological molecules. ESI-TOF mass spectrometers are particularly useful for: identification, protein analysis and functional complex analysis in proteomics and protein function; molecular identification in metabolomics, natural product and drug metabolite analysis; combinatorial chemistry high throughput screening; and fast liquid chromatography mass spectrometry, or liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS), in drug discovery and development. 9 FTMS systems utilize high-field superconducting magnets to offer the highest resolution, selectivity, and mass accuracy currently achievable in mass spectrometry. Our systems based on this technology often eliminate the need for time-consuming separation techniques in complex mixture analyses. In addition, our systems can fragment molecular ions to perform exact mass analysis on all fragments to determine molecular structure. FTMS systems are particularly useful for: the study of structure and function of biomolecules, including proteins, DNA, and natural products; complex mixture analysis including body fluids or combinatorial libraries; high-throughput proteomics and metabolomics; and top-down proteomics of intact proteins without the need for enzymatic digestion of the proteins prior to analysis. We offer next-generation hybrid FTMS systems that combine a traditional external quadrupole mass selector and hexapole collision cell with a high-performance FTMS for further ion dissociation, top-down proteomics tools, and ultra-high resolution detection. ITMS systems collect all ions simultaneously, which improves sensitivity relative to previous quadrupole mass spectrometers. Ion trap mass spectrometers are particularly useful for: sequencing and identification based on peptide structural analysis; quantitative liquid chromatography mass spectrometry; identification of combinatorial libraries; and generally enhancing the speed and efficiency of the drug discovery and development process. GC systems are used to separate volatile or semi-volatile compounds by separating them into individual components using a temperature controlled gas chromatographer. In GC systems, a sample is introduced to the gas chromatographer and it passes through a chromatography column. The chromatographer separates mixtures into individual components and provides a quantitative analysis of the components. Our GC systems can be utilized in a variety of configurations and are designed to enhance system efficiency and performance and to provide analysts with flexibility in choosing their platform or customizing their system to meet their particular application need. Our GC systems are particularly useful for applications in petroleum, fuel and hydrocarbon analysis, food and product safety, and forensics and environmental analysis. GC-MS systems combine the features of gas chromatography and mass spectrometry to identify different substances within a test sample. The two components, used together, allow for a finer degree of substance identification than either system when used separately. The result is a quantitative analysis of the components and the mass spectrum of each component. Our GC-MS systems are available in single and triple quadrupole configurations and can be configured with a variety of options to suit a range of applications. Our GC-MS systems have applications in food and product safety, forensics, clinical and toxicology testing and environmental, pharmaceutical and chemical analysis. LC-MS systems combine the separation features of liquid chromatography with the molecular identification features of mass spectrometry to separate, identify and quantify different substances within a test sample. As a complimentary technique to GC-MS, which analyzes volatile compounds, LC-MS can be used to analyze a wide range of non-volatile compounds in complex samples. Our LC-MS systems are available in a wide range of configurations to suit a user’s specific needs. Although primarily used for life science applications, our LC-MS systems also have applications in food and product safety, forensics, clinical and toxicology testing, as well as environmental, pharmaceutical and chemical analysis. ICP-MS systems utilize mass spectrometers combined with a high-temperature inductively coupled plasma source. The inductively coupled plasma source can convert solid and liquid samples to ions which are then separated and detected by the mass spectrometer. ICP-MS is a fast and flexible technique that offers advantages over more traditional techniques for elemental analysis. Our ICP-MS systems are designed to provide high performance and ease of use. ICP-MS systems are used for both routine analysis and research in a variety of areas including environmental, geochemical and food and agriculture fields. 10 FT-IR spectrometers utilize the mid- and far-infrared regions of the electromagnetic spectrum. Our FT-IR systems are commonly used for various quality control and materials research applications. NIR spectrometers utilize the near-infrared region of the electromagnetic spectrum. Our NIR instruments are primarily used for quality and process control applications in the pharmaceutical, food and agriculture, and chemical industries. The pharmaceutical industry is the leading user of NIR instruments, and applications include quality control, research and development, and process analytical technology. The food and agricultural industry is the second largest user of NIR instrumentation, with an increasing demand for food, forage, and beverage quality control. Raman spectroscopy provides information on molecular structure. The mechanism of Raman scattering is different from that of infrared absorption, in that Raman and IR spectra provide complementary information. Raman is useful for the identification of both organic and inorganic compounds and functional groups. It is a nondestructive technique, and can be used for the analysis of both liquids and solids. Raman is well suited for use in the polymer and pharmaceutical industries, and has applications in the metals, electronics and semiconductors industries. The technique also has applications in life sciences, forensics and artwork authentication. We also sell a wide range of portable analytical and bioanalytical detection systems and related products for CBRNE detection. Our customers use these devices for nuclear, biological agent and chemical agent defense applications, anti-terrorism, law enforcement, and process and facilities monitoring. Our CBRNE detection products use many of the same technology platforms as our life science products, as well as additional technologies, including infrared stand-off detection and ion mobility spectrometry, for handheld chemical detectors. We also provide integrated, comprehensive detection suites that include our multiple detection systems, consumables, training and simulators. Bruker MAT Products Bruker MAT’s X-ray systems integrate powerful detectors with advanced X-ray sources, computer- controlled positioning systems, sample handling devices, and data collection and analysis software to acquire, analyze and manage elemental and molecular information. These integrated solutions address many of the matter characterization and structure needs of the life science, pharmaceutical, semiconductor, raw materials and research industries across a broad range of applications. During 2013, we introduced an innovative high-resolution X-ray micro-CT system, which can non-destructively visualize up to 200 Megapixel (14,450x14,450 pixels) virtual slices through objects, and the ECO series for X-ray fluorescence (XRD), X-ray diffraction (XRF) and chemical X-ray crystallography (SC-XRD), which allows for a reduced ecological footprint while delivering high performance. We also introduced additional enhancements in our atomic force microscopy, optical metrology and electron microscope platforms. In addition, during 2013 we acquired a fluorescence optical microscopy business, adding to the technologies available in our atomic force microscopy business. Bruker MAT systems are based on the following technology platforms: (cid:127) XRD—Polycrystalline X-ray diffraction, often referred to as X-ray diffraction; (cid:127) XRF—X-ray fluorescence, also called X-ray spectrometry, including handheld XRF systems; (cid:127) SC-XRD—Single crystal X-ray diffraction, often referred to as X-ray crystallography; (cid:127) (cid:1)CT—X-ray micro computed tomography; (cid:127) EDS—Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy on electron microscopes; (cid:127) EBSD—Electron backscatter diffraction on electron microscopes; (cid:127) S-OES—Spark optical emission spectroscopy; 11 (cid:127) CS/ONH—Combustion analysis for carbon, sulfur, oxygen, nitrogen, and hydrogen in solids; (cid:127) AFM—Atomic force microscopy; (cid:127) FM—Fluorescence optical microscopy; (cid:127) SOM—Stylus and optical metrology; and (cid:127) TMT—Tribology and mechanical test systems for analysis of friction and wear. XRD systems investigate polycrystalline samples or thin films with single wavelength X-rays. The atoms in the polycrystalline sample scatter the X-rays to create a unique diffraction pattern recorded by a detector. Computer software processes the pattern and produces a variety of information, including stress, texture, qualitative and quantitative phase composition, crystallite size, percent crystallinity and layer thickness, composition, defects and density of thin films and semiconductor material. Our XRD systems contribute to a reduction in the development cycles for new products in the catalyst, polymer, electronic, optical material and semiconductor industries. Customers also use our XRD systems for analyses in a variety of other fields, including forensics, art and archaeology. XRF systems determine the elemental composition of a material and provide a full qualitative and quantitative analysis. Our XRF systems direct X-rays at a sample, and the atoms in the sample absorb the X-ray energy. The elements in the sample then emit X-rays that are characteristic for each element. The system collects the X-rays, and the software analyzes the resulting data to determine the elements that are present. Our XRF products provide automated solutions on a turn-key basis for industrial users that require automated, controlled production processes that reduce product and process cost, increase output, and improve product quality. Our XRF products cover substantially all of the periodic table and can analyze solid, powder or liquid samples. SC-XRD systems determine the three-dimensional structures of molecules in a chemical, mineral, or biological substance being analyzed. SC-XRD systems have the capability to determine structure in both small chemical molecules and larger biomolecules. SC-XRD systems direct an X-ray beam at a solid, single crystal sample. The atoms in the crystal sample scatter the X-rays to create a precise diffraction pattern recorded by an electronic detector. Software then reconstructs a model of the structure and provides the unique arrangement of the atoms in the sample. This information on the exact arrangement of atoms in the sample is a critical part of molecular analysis and can provide insight into a variety of areas, including how a protein functions or interacts with a second molecule. Our SC-XRD systems are designed for use in the life sciences industry, academic research, and a variety of other applications. (cid:1)CT is X-ray imaging in 3D, by the same method used in hospital CT scans, but on a small scale with massively increased resolution. 3D microscopy allows users to image the internal structure of objects non-destructively on a very fine scale. Bruker (cid:1)CT is available in a range of easy-to-use desktop instruments, which generate 3D images of the sample’s morphology and internal microstructure with resolution down to the sub-micron level. Our (cid:1)CT systems are used for numerous applications in materials research and in the life sciences industry. EDS systems analyze the chemical composition of materials under investigation in electron microscopes by utilizing the fact that atoms of different chemical elements, when exposed to the high energy electron beam generated by the microscope, irradiate X-rays of different, characteristic energy. The evaluation of the energy spectrum collected by our spectrometer allows the determination of the qualitative and quantitative chemical sample composition at the current beam position. EDS systems allow for simultaneous analysis of all elements in the periodic table, beginning with atomic number 4 (beryllium). Our EDS systems are used for a range of applications, including nanotechnology and advanced materials research, as well as materials analysis and quality control. Customers for EDS systems include industrial customers, academia and government research facilities. 12 EBSD systems are used to perform quantitative microstructure analysis of crystalline samples in electron microscopes. The microscope’s electron beam strikes the tilted sample and diffracted electrons form a pattern on a fluorescent screen. This pattern is characteristic of the crystal structure and orientation of the sample region from which it was generated. It provides the absolute crystal orientation with sub-micron resolution. EBSD can be used to characterize materials with regard to crystal orientation, texture, stress, strain and grain size. EBSD also allows the identification of crystalline phases and their distribution, and is applied to many industries such as metals processing, aerospace, automotive, microelectronics and earth sciences. S-OES instruments are used for analyzing metals. S-OES covers a broad range of applications for metals analysis from pure metals trace analysis to high alloyed grades, and allow for analysis of a complete range of relevant elements simultaneously. S-OES instruments pass an electric spark onto a sample, which burns the surface of the sample and causes atoms to jump to a higher orbit. Our detectors quantify the light emitted by these atoms and help our customers to determine the elemental composition of the material. This technique is widely used in production control laboratories of foundries and steel mills. CS/ONH carrier gas systems incorporate a furnace and infrared or thermal conductivity detection to analyze inorganic materials for the determination of carbon, sulfur, nitrogen, oxygen and hydrogen. Combustion and inert gas fusion analyzers are used for applications in metal production and processing, chemicals, ceramics and cement, coal processing and oil refining, and semiconductors. AFM systems provide atomic or near-atomic resolution of material surface topography using a nano-scale probe that is brought into light contact with the sample being investigated. In addition to presenting a surface image, AFM can also provide quantitative nano-scale measurements of feature sizes, material properties, electrical information, chemical properties and other sample characteristics. Our AFM systems are used for applications in materials and biological research and semiconductor, data storage hard drive, LED, battery, solar cells, polymers and pharmaceutical product development, and manufacturing. FM uses fluorescence microscopy to determine the structure and composition of life science samples. Our products include two-photon microscopes, multipoint scanning confocal microscopes, laser illumination sources, photoactivation, photostimulation, photoablation accessories and synchronization and analysis software. Two-photon microscopes allow imaging deep into tissues and cells and are used widely in neuroscience. Multipoint scanning confocal systems allow live cell imaging with rapid acquisition of images for structural and composition analysis. SOM systems provide atomic or near-atomic two dimensional and three dimensional surface resolution using white light interferometry, confocal optical and stylus profilometry methods. SOM profilers range from low-cost manual tools for single measurements to advanced, highly automated systems for production line quality assurance and quality control applications where the combination of throughput, repeatability and reproducibility is essential. SOM profilers support a range of applications in research, product development, tribology, quality control and failure analysis related to materials and machining in the automotive, orthopedic, ophthalmic, high brightness LED, semiconductor, data storage, optics and other markets. TMT systems provide a platform for all types of common mechanical, friction, durability, scratch and indentation tests for a wide spectrum of materials. Tribology systems are utilized for both academic research of the fundamental material properties and industrial applications in the semiconductor, aerospace, petroleum, automotive and other industries. 13 BEST Segment BEST products include superconducting materials as well as superconductivity-enabled tools and devices for markets in healthcare and ‘‘big science’’ research. The BEST product line also includes non-superconducting materials and conventional devices. Low temperature superconducting products are used in diagnostic and research tools for the healthcare and life science industries, including clinical MRI and ultra-high field NMR spectroscopy. Low temperature superconducting materials are also used in products developed or in development for a range of renewable energy and ‘‘big science’’ research applications, including energy storage, high energy physics and fusion research. High temperature superconducting, or HTS, materials are used in a range of pre-commercial HTS applications, including motors, generators, superconducting fault current limiters, transformers, cables and current leads. Sales and Marketing We maintain direct sales forces throughout North America, Europe, Japan, Asia Pacific and Australia. We also utilize indirect sales channels to reach customers. We have various international distributors, independent sales representatives, and various other representatives in parts of Asia, Latin America, and Eastern Europe. These entities augment our direct sales force and provide coverage in areas where we do not have direct sales personnel. In addition, we have adopted a distribution business model in which we engage in strategic distribution alliances with other companies to address certain market segments. The sales cycle for our products is dependent on the size and complexity of the system and budgeting cycles of our customers. Our sales cycle is typically three to twenty four months for academic and high-end research products and two weeks to six months for industrial products. The sales cycle of our low temperature superconducting materials is typically four to twelve months, with cycles of certain high-end materials exceeding one year. Sales of our superconducting devices typically take more than one year and certain large, complex contracts can take more than two years to obtain. We have well-equipped applications and demonstration facilities and qualified application personnel who assist customers and provide product demonstrations in specific application areas. We maintain our primary demonstration facilities at our production facilities as well as in other key market locations. Customers We have a broad and diversified global life sciences customer base, which is composed primarily of end-users and includes pharmaceutical, biotechnology, proteomics, molecular diagnostics, food/feed/ agricultural and fine chemical companies, as well as commercial laboratories, university laboratories, medical schools and other not-for-profit research institutions and government laboratories. We also sell to a number of semiconductor, polymer, automotive, cement, steel, aluminum and combinatorial materials design companies. The majority of our low temperature superconducting materials are sold to magnetic resonance imaging and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging manufacturers and our superconducting devices are sold primarily to universities, as well as national and international research facilities. We do not depend on any single customer and no single customer accounted for more than 10% of revenue in any of the last three fiscal years. Competition Our existing products and solutions and any products and solutions that we develop in the future may compete in multiple, highly competitive markets. In addition, there has been a trend towards consolidation in our industry and many of our competitors have substantially greater financial, technical, and marketing resources than we do. Our competitors may succeed in developing and offering products that could render our products or those of our strategic partners obsolete or noncompetitive. In addition, many of these competitors have significantly more experience in the life 14 sciences, chemical and materials markets. Our ability to compete successfully will depend on our ability to develop proprietary products that reach our target markets in a timely manner and are technologically superior to and/or less expensive, or more cost effective, than products marketed by our competitors. Current competitors or other companies may possess or develop technologies and products that are more effective than ours. Our technologies and products may be rendered obsolete or uneconomical by technological advances or by entirely different approaches developed by one or more of our competitors. We also compete with companies that provide analytical or automation tools based on other technologies. These technologies may prove to be more successful in meeting demands in the markets that our products and solutions serve. In addition, other companies may choose to enter our fields in the future. We believe that the principal competitive factors in our markets are technology-based applications expertise, product specifications, functionality, reliability, marketing expertise, distribution capability, proprietary patent portfolios, cost and cost effectiveness. BSI Segment Bruker BioSpin competes with companies that offer magnetic resonance spectrometers, mainly Agilent, JEOL, and Oxford Instruments. In the field of preclinical imaging, Bruker BioSpin competes with Perkin Elmer, Mediso, Trifoil, MR Solutions, RS2D, Visualsonics (Fuji Film) and others. Bruker CALID competes with a variety of companies that offer mass spectrometry-based systems. Bruker CALID’s competitors in the life science markets and chemical and applied markets include Danaher, Agilent, GE-Healthcare, Waters, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Shimadzu, Hitachi and JEOL. Bruker CALID’s CBRNE detection customers are highly fragmented, and we compete with a number of companies in this area, of which the most significant competitor is Smiths Detection. Bruker CALID also competes with a variety of companies that offer molecular spectrometry-based systems, including Thermo Fisher Scientific, PerkinElmer, Agilent, Foss, ABB Bomem, Renishaw, Buchi, Shimadzu and Jasco. In addition, there are several smaller companies, specializing in various markets, with which we compete frequently. Bruker MAT competes with companies that offer analytical X-ray solutions, OES systems, AFM and SOM systems, and optical fluorescence systems, primarily Rigaku, Oxford Instruments, Agilent, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Ametek’s Spectro and Edax divisions, PANalytical, Jordan Valley, Olympus, Nikon, Zeiss and Danaher’s Leica business. BEST Segment BEST competes with Oxford Instruments and Luvata in low temperature superconducting materials. In addition, BEST competes with AMSC, SuperPower (a Furukawa company), Superconductor Technologies Inc., and SuNam Co., Ltd., in the market for second generation high temperature superconducting materials, FMB Oxford in the market for synchrotron beamlines, and Xradia in the market for X-ray microscopes. BEST further competes with Zanon, Mitsubishi Electric and AES in the development and supply of accelerator cavities, with Thales, Toshiba and CPI International in the development and supply of radio frequency couplers, with Mitsubishi Heavy Industries in the development and supply of superconducting accelerator modules and with AES and Thales for electron linear accelerators. Seasonal Nature of Business We experience highly variable and fluctuating revenues in the first three quarters of the year, while our fourth quarter revenues have historically been stronger than the rest of the year. 15 Manufacturing and Supplies Several of our manufacturing facilities are certified under ISO 9001:2008 and ISO 13485, an international quality standard. We manufacture and test our magnetic resonance products at our facilities in Karlsruhe, Germany; Wissembourg, France; Zurich, Switzerland; and Billerica, Massachusetts, U.S.A. We manufacture and test our preclinical imaging products at our facilities in Ettlingen, Germany; Wissembourg, France; Kontich, Belgium; Zurich, Switzerland; and Billerica, Massachusetts, U.S.A. We manufacture and test our mass spectrometry products, including CBRNE detection products, at our facilities in Bremen, Germany; Leipzig, Germany; Billerica, Massachusetts, U.S.A.; and Fremont, California, U.S.A. We manufacture and test our molecular spectroscopy products at our facilities in Ettlingen, Germany; Billerica, Massachusetts, U.S.A.; and The Woodlands, Texas, U.S.A. We manufacture and test our X-ray, OES and AFM products at our facilities in Karlsruhe, Germany; Berlin, Germany; Kalkar, Germany; Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.; Santa Barbara, California, U.S.A.; Kennewick, Washington, U.S.A.; and Yokohama, Japan. We manufacture and test the majority of our energy and superconducting products at our facilities in Hanau, Germany; Bergisch Gladbach, Germany; Cologne, Germany; and Perth, Scotland. Manufacturing processes at our facilities in Europe and California, U.S.A. include all phases of manufacturing, such as machining, fabrication, subassembly, system assembly, and final testing. Our other facilities primarily perform high-level assembly, system integration, and final testing. We typically manufacture critical components in-house to ensure key competence. We have begun to outsource the manufacturing of various non-critical components such as connectics, mechanics, circuit boards and certain electronics to third party contract manufacturers as part of our cost saving initiatives. We purchase material and components from various suppliers that are either standard products or built to our specifications. We obtain some of the components included in our products from a limited group of suppliers or from a single-source supplier for items such as charge coupled device area detectors, X-ray tubes, robotics and infrared optics. Bruker AXS has an ongoing collaboration and joint development project with the Siemens Medical Solutions Vacuum Technology Division in Germany for the development of X-ray tubes. Some Bruker AXS subsidiaries, Bruker Nano GmbH, Bruker Elemental GmbH, and Bruker AXS Handheld Inc., presently procure key X-ray detector chips and certain OES optical detectors and miniaturized X-ray sources from single-source suppliers. In addition, BEST sources niobium titanium and other niobium products from a single supplier. Research and Development We commit substantial capital and resources to internal and collaborative research and development projects in order to provide innovative products and solutions to our customers. We conduct research primarily to enhance system performance and improve the reliability of existing products, and to develop new products and solutions. We expensed $190.5 million, $195.3 million and $177.2 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, for research and development purposes. Our research and development efforts are conducted for the relevant products within each of the operating segments, as well as in collaboration on areas such as microfluidics, automation and workflow management software. We have been the recipient of government grants from Germany and the U.S. for various projects related to early-stage research and development. We have generally retained, at a minimum, non-exclusive rights to any items or enhancements we develop under these grants. The German government requires that we use and market technology developed under grants in order to retain our rights to the technology. We have also accepted some sponsored research contracts from private sources. BSI Segment The research and development performed in the BSI segment is primarily conducted at our facilities in Bremen, Ettlingen, Karlsruhe and Leipzig, Germany; Faellanden, Switzerland; Wissembourg, 16 France; Billerica, Massachusetts, U.S.A.; Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.; Fremont, California, U.S.A.; and Santa Barbara, California, U.S.A. The Bruker BioSpin Group maintains technical competencies in core magnetic resonance technologies and single- and multimodal imaging technologies and capabilities, including NMR, EPR, MRI, MPI, PET, CT and OI. Recent projects include the development of solid state dynamic nuclear polarization technologies, an ongoing development that enables gains in sensitivity for NMR, high field EPR instrumentation with dedicated cryogen free magnets, high field magnet technology for preclinical MRI, basic NMR research and quadruple tuned cryoprobes for biological research, as well as MPI imaging for preclinical application. The Bruker CALID Group maintains technical competencies in core mass spectrometry technologies and capabilities, including: MALDI, ESI, ICP and EI/CI ion sources; TOF, TOF/TOF, ion traps, FTMS and quadrupole analyzers; bioinformatics; and related software. Recent projects include an integrated multidimensional solution for proteomics that provides enhanced protein identification, structural information and distribution and quantitative information. In addition, during 2013 the Bruker CALID Group was granted clearance by the FDA to market our MALDI Biotyper for the identification of Gram negative bacterial colonies cultured from human specimens. The Bruker CALID Group also developed an automated headspace sampler that compliments its gas chromatography products by allowing analysis of potentially toxic volatile organic compounds. The Bruker CALID Group also maintains technical competencies in core vibrational spectroscopy technologies and capabilities, including FT-IR, NIR, and Raman. Recent projects include the LUMOS FT-IR Microscope, which is Bruker Optics’ next generation microscope that combines high performance for visual inspection and infrared spectral analysis with high comfort in use. The Bruker MAT Group maintains technical competencies in core X-ray technologies and capabilities, including detectors used to sense X-ray and X-ray diffraction patterns, X-ray sources and optics that generate and focus the X-rays, robotics and sample handling equipment that holds and manipulates the experimental material, and software that generates the structural data. Recent projects include refining next-generation high brilliancy optics and microsources, developing new high-power X-ray sources for X-ray diffraction and protein crystallography applications, developing a TXRF system for trace element analysis in semiconductor metrology, developing a new large solid angle, high-resolution, high-throughput energy dispersive X-ray detector for microanalysis, creating a high sensitivity area detector system, and developing other solution-based technologies and software applications including a product for X-ray scattering investigations of protein crystals. The Bruker MAT Group also has leading core competencies in AFM technology with recent innovations including faster scanning and higher resolution imaging and nano-scale electrical and nano-mechanical characterization. The Bruker MAT Group has leading edge technology in optical fluorescence two-photon, microscopy and multipoint scanning microscopy. BEST Segment The research and development performed in the BEST segment is primarily conducted at our facilities in Hanau, Bergisch Gladbach, Cologne, and Alzenau, Germany. BEST maintains technical competencies in the production and development of low and high temperature superconducting materials and devices. Intellectual Property Our intellectual property consists of patents, copyrights, trade secrets, know-how, and trademarks. Protection of our intellectual property is a strategic priority for our business because of the length of time and expense associated with bringing new products through the development process and to the marketplace. We have a substantial patent portfolio, and we intend to file additional patent applications 17 as appropriate. We believe our owned and licensed patent portfolio provides us with a competitive advantage. This portfolio permits us to maintain access to a number of key technologies. We license our owned patent rights where appropriate. We intend to enforce our patent rights against infringers, if necessary. The patent positions of life sciences tools companies involve complex legal and factual questions. As a result, we cannot predict the enforceability of our patents with certainty. In addition, we are aware of the existence from time to time of patents in certain countries, which, if valid, could impair our ability to manufacture and sell products in these countries. We also rely upon trade secrets, know-how, trademarks, copyright protection, and licensing to develop and maintain our competitive position. We generally require the execution of confidentiality agreements by our employees, consultants, and other scientific advisors. These agreements provide that all confidential information made known during the course of a relationship with us will be held in confidence and used only for our benefit. In addition, these agreements provide that we own all inventions generated during the course of the relationship. Government Contracts We are a party to various government contracts. Under some of these government contracts, the government may receive license or similar rights to intellectual property developed under the contract. However, under government contracts we enter we generally receive no less than non-exclusive rights to any items or technologies we develop. Although we transact business with various government agencies, we believe that no government contract is of such magnitude that a renegotiation of profits or termination of the contract or subcontracts at the election of the government would have a material adverse effect on our financial results. Government Regulation We are required to comply with federal, state, and local environmental protection regulations. We do not expect this compliance to have a significant impact on our capital spending, earnings, or competitive position. Prior to introducing a product in the U.S., our Bruker AXS subsidiary provides notice to the FDA, in the form of a Radiation Safety Abbreviated Report, which provides identification information and operating characteristics of the product. If the FDA finds that the report is complete, it provides approval in the form of what is known as an accession number. Bruker AXS may not market a product until it has received an accession number. In addition, Bruker AXS submits an annual report to the FDA that includes the radiation safety history of all products it sells in the U.S. Bruker AXS is required to report to the FDA incidents of accidental exposure to radiation arising from the manufacture, testing, or use of any of its products. Bruker AXS also reports to state governments, which products it sells in their states. For sales in Germany, Bruker AXS registers each system with the local authorities. In some countries where Bruker AXS sells systems, Bruker AXS uses the license we obtained from the federal authorities in Germany to assist it in obtaining a license from the country in which the sale occurs. In addition, as indicated above, we are subject to various other foreign and domestic environmental, health and safety laws and regulations in connection with our operations. Apart from these areas, we are subject to the laws and regulations generally applicable to businesses in the jurisdictions in which we operate. Our Bruker AXS subsidiary possesses low-level radiation materials licenses from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission for its facility in Madison, Wisconsin; from the local radiation safety authority, Gewerbeaufsichtsamt Karlsruhe, for its facility in Karlsruhe, Germany; and from the local radiation safety authority, Kanagawa Prefecture, for its facility in Yokohama, Japan, as well as from various other countries in which it sells its products. Our Bruker Daltonics subsidiary possesses low-level radiation 18 licenses for facilities in Billerica, Massachusetts, and Leipzig, Germany. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission also has regulations concerning the exposure of our employees to radiation. Our MALDI Biotyper System is subject to regulation in the U.S. by the FDA. As such, we continually invest in our manufacturing operations and quality systems infrastructures necessary to maintain our FDA clearance. Our facilities in Billerica, Massachusetts have established quality management systems and manufacturing operations which are designed and configured to comply with the standards and requirements for in vitro diagnostic medical devices stipulated by FDA 21 CFR Part 820 and by ISO 13485:2003. The Billerica, Massachusetts manufacturing facility is registered with the FDA as a medical device manufacturing facility, which is the same location where the MALDI Biotyper System is manufactured and distributed. Internal Investigation and Compliance Matters As previously reported, the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors, assisted by independent outside counsel and an independent forensic consulting firm, conducted an internal investigation in response to anonymous communications received by us alleging improper conduct in connection with the China operations of the Company’s Bruker Optics subsidiary. The Audit Committee’s investigation, which began in 2011 and was completed in the first quarter of 2012, included a review of compliance by Bruker Optics and its employees in China and Hong Kong with the requirements of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (‘‘FCPA’’) and other applicable laws and regulations. The investigation found evidence indicating that payments were made that improperly benefited employees or agents of government-owned enterprises in China and Hong Kong. The investigation also found evidence that certain employees of Bruker Optics in China and Hong Kong failed to comply with the Company’s policies and standards of conduct. As a result, we took personnel actions, including the termination of certain individuals. We also terminated our business relationships with certain third party agents, implemented an enhanced FCPA compliance program, and strengthened the financial controls and oversight at our subsidiaries operating in China and Hong Kong. During 2011, we also initiated a review of the China operations of our other subsidiaries, with the assistance of an independent audit firm. On the basis of the review conducted to date, we have identified additional employees in our subsidiaries operating in China who failed to comply with our policies and standards of conduct, and have taken additional personnel actions at certain of our subsidiaries as a result. The review is ongoing and no conclusions can be drawn at this time as to its final outcome. We voluntarily contacted the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and the United States Department of Justice in August 2011 to advise both agencies of the internal investigation by the Audit Committee regarding the China operations of our Bruker Optics subsidiary. In October 2011, we also reported the existence of that internal investigation to the Hong Kong Joint Financial Intelligence Unit and Independent Commission Against Corruption (‘‘ICAC’’). We have cooperated with the United States federal agencies and Hong Kong government authorities with respect to their inquiries and have provided documents and/or made witnesses available in response to requests from the governmental authorities reviewing this matter. We intend to continue to cooperate with these agencies in connection with their inquiries. At this time we cannot reasonably assess the timing or outcome of these matters or their effect, if any, on our business. The FCPA and related statutes and regulations provide for potential monetary penalties as well as criminal and civil sanctions in connection with FCPA violations. It is possible that monetary penalties and other sanctions could be assessed by the U.S. Federal government in connection with these matters. Additionally, to the extent any payments are determined to be illegal by local government authorities, civil or criminal penalties may be assessed by such authorities and our ability to conduct business in that jurisdiction may be negatively impacted. At this time, we cannot predict the extent to which the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’), the Department of Justice (‘‘DOJ’’), the 19 ICAC or any other governmental authorities will pursue administrative, civil injunctive or criminal proceedings, the imposition of fines or penalties or other remedies or sanctions. Given the current status of the inquiries from these agencies, we cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of possible loss that may result from any proceedings that may be commenced by the SEC, the DOJ, the ICAC or any other governmental authorities. Accordingly, no provision with respect to such matters has been recorded in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Any adverse findings or other negative outcomes from any such proceedings could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements in future periods. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, $6.1 million, $11.1 million and $4.3 million, respectively, was recorded for legal and other professional services incurred related to the internal investigation of these matters. Working Capital Requirements There are no credit terms extended to customers that would have a material adverse effect on our working capital. We typically recognize revenue from system sales upon customer acceptance. To effectively operate our business, we are required to hold a significant number of systems that have been shipped to customers but are not yet accepted by the customer, or finished goods in-transit. As a result, a significant percentage of our inventory represents finished goods in-transit. Finished goods in-transit were $81.9 million and $93.9 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. We also have well-equipped applications and demonstration facilities and qualified application personnel who assist customers and provide product demonstrations in specific application areas. In total, we held $48.3 million and $55.0 million of demonstration inventory at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Backlog Our backlog consists of firm orders under non-cancellable purchase orders received from customers. Total system backlog at December 31, 2013 and 2012 was approximately $921 million and $1,035 million, respectively. We anticipate that approximately 82% of the backlog as of December 31, 2013 will be filled in 2014. We experience variable and fluctuating revenues in the first three quarters of the year, while our fourth quarter revenues have historically been stronger than the rest of the year. As a result, backlog on any particular date can be indicative of our short-term revenue performance, but is not necessarily a reliable indicator of long-term revenue performance. Employees As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, we had approximately 6,200 and 6,400 full-time employees worldwide, respectively. Of these employees, approximately 1,200 were located in the U.S. as of December 31, 2013 and 2012. Our employees in the U.S. are not unionized or affiliated with any labor organizations. Employees based outside the U.S. are primarily located in Europe. Several of our international subsidiaries are parties to contracts with labor unions and workers’ councils. We believe that we have good relationships with our employees and the workers’ councils. As of December 31, 2013, we had approximately 3,060 employees in production and distribution, 1,480 employees in selling and marketing and 1,010 employees in research and development. As of December 31, 2012, we had approximately 3,070 employees in production and distribution, 1,560 employees in selling and marketing and 1,090 employees in research and development. 20 Financial Information about Geographic Areas and Segments Financial information about our geographic areas and segments may be found in Note 20 to our Financial Statements in this annual report on Form 10-K, included as part of Item 8 to this report, which includes information about our revenues from external customers, measure of profit and total assets by reportable segment. Available Information Our website is located at www.bruker.com. We make available free of charge through this website our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed with or furnished to the SEC pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. ITEM 1A RISK FACTORS The following risk factors should be considered in conjunction with the other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This report may include forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. In addition to those risk factors discussed elsewhere in this report, we identify the following risk factors, which could affect our actual results and cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. We could be exposed to liabilities under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or FCPA, and other laws and regulations, including foreign laws. As a result of our international operations, we are subject to compliance with various laws and regulations, including the FCPA and other anti-bribery laws in the jurisdictions in which we do business, which generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries or agents from engaging in bribery or making improper payments to foreign officials or their agents. The FCPA also requires proper record keeping and characterization of such payments in our reports filed with the SEC. Despite maintaining policies and procedures that require our employees to comply with these laws and our standards of ethical conduct, we cannot ensure that these policies and procedures will always protect us from intentional, reckless or negligent acts committed by our employees or agents. As previously reported, the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors, assisted by independent outside counsel and an independent forensic consulting firm, conducted an internal investigation in response to anonymous communications received by the Company alleging improper conduct in connection with the China operations of the Company’s Bruker Optics subsidiary. The Audit Committee’s investigation, which began in 2011 and was completed in the first quarter of 2012, included a review of compliance by Bruker Optics and its employees in China and Hong Kong with the requirements of the FCPA and other applicable laws and regulations. The investigation found evidence indicating that payments were made that improperly benefited employees or agents of government-owned enterprises in China and Hong Kong. The investigation also found evidence that certain employees of Bruker Optics in China and Hong Kong failed to comply with the Company’s policies and standards of conduct. As a result, we took personnel actions, including the termination of certain individuals. We also terminated our business relationships with certain third party agents, implemented an enhanced FCPA compliance program, and strengthened the financial controls and oversight at our subsidiaries operating in China and Hong Kong. During 2011, we also initiated a review of the China operations of our other subsidiaries, with the assistance of an independent audit firm. On the basis of the review conducted to date, we have identified additional employees in our subsidiaries operating in China who failed to comply with our policies and standards 21 of conduct, and have taken additional personnel actions at certain of our subsidiaries as a result. The review is ongoing and no conclusions can be drawn at this time as to its final outcome. We voluntarily contacted the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and the United States Department of Justice in August 2011 to advise both agencies of the internal investigation by the Audit Committee regarding the China operations of our Bruker Optics subsidiary. In October 2011, we also reported the existence of that internal investigation to the Hong Kong Joint Financial Intelligence Unit and ICAC. We have cooperated with the United States federal agencies and Hong Kong government authorities with respect to their inquiries and have provided documents and/or made witnesses available in response to requests from the governmental authorities reviewing this matter. The Company intends to continue to cooperate with these agencies in connection with their inquiries. At this time we cannot reasonably assess the timing or outcome of these matters or their effect, if any, on the Company’s business. The FCPA and related statutes and regulations provide for potential monetary penalties as well as criminal and civil sanctions in connection with FCPA violations. It is possible that monetary penalties and other sanctions could be assessed by the Federal government in connection with these matters. Additionally, to the extent any payments are determined to be illegal by local government authorities, civil or criminal penalties may be assessed by such authorities and the Company’s ability to conduct business in that jurisdiction may be negatively impacted. At this time, the Company cannot predict the extent to which the SEC, the DOJ, the ICAC or any other governmental authorities will pursue administrative, civil injunctive or criminal proceedings, the imposition of fines or penalties or other remedies or sanctions. These inquiries also could result in regulatory proceedings, and thus potentially adverse findings, that could require us to pay damages or penalties or have other remedies imposed upon us. In addition, it is possible that the findings and outcome of any of these inquiries and any subsequent regulatory proceedings could result in other lawsuits being brought against the Company and its officers and directors. Additionally, to the extent any payments are determined to be illegal by Hong Kong or other local government authorities, civil or criminal penalties may be assessed by such authorities and our ability to continue to conduct business in that jurisdiction may be negatively impacted. Thus, any adverse findings or other negative outcomes in any of these inquiries could adversely affect our business, reputation, results of operations, financial position and cash flows, and ultimately our stock price. Unfavorable economic or political conditions in the countries in which we operate may have an adverse impact on our business results or financial condition. Our business and results of operations are affected by international, national and regional economic and political conditions. Many of the countries in which we operate, including particularly the U.S. and countries in Europe, have experienced and continue to experience uncertain economic conditions. Our business or financial results may be adversely impacted by unfavorable changes in economic or political conditions in these countries, including adverse changes in interest rates or tax rates, volatile financial and commodity markets, contraction in the availability of credit in the marketplace, and changes in capital spending patterns. Our revenue from U.S. operations represented approximately 20% and 21% of total consolidated revenue for fiscal 2013 and 2012, respectively. Our revenue from operations in Europe represented approximately 42% and 39% of total consolidated revenue for the corresponding periods. Our revenue from operations in the Asia Pacific region represented approximately 29% of total consolidated revenue for each of the respective periods. If economic growth in the U.S. and other countries slows or does not improve, current economic conditions in Europe do not improve or deteriorate further, or if the level of government funding for scientific research is reduced, our current or potential customers may delay or reduce purchases which could, in turn, result in reductions in sales of our products, materially and adversely affecting our results of operations and cash flows. 22 Continued volatility and disruption of global financial markets could limit our customers’ ability to obtain adequate financing to maintain operations and proceed with planned or new capital spending initiatives, leading to a reduction in sales volume that could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and cash flow. Continuation of an economic downturn may also lead to increased pricing pressure for our products and services and a reduction in our operating margins and profitability. In addition, a decline in our customers’ ability to pay as a result of a slow-down in the general global or local economy may lead to increased difficulties in the collection of our accounts receivable, higher levels of reserves for doubtful accounts and write-offs of accounts receivable, and higher operating costs as a percentage of revenues. We cannot predict how current or worsening economic conditions or political instability will affect our customers and suppliers or how any negative impact on our customers and suppliers might adversely impact our business results or financial condition. We derive a significant portion of our revenue from international sales and are subject to the risks of doing business in foreign countries. International sales account and are expected to continue to account for a significant portion of our total revenues. Our revenue from non-U.S. operations represented approximately 80% and 79% of our total consolidated revenue for fiscal 2013 and 2012, respectively. Our international operations are, and will continue to be, subject to a variety of risks associated with conducting business internationally, many of which are beyond our control. These risks, which may adversely affect our ability to achieve and maintain profitability and our ability to sell our products internationally, include: (cid:127) changes in foreign currency exchange rates; (cid:127) changes in regulatory requirements; (cid:127) legislation and regulation, including tariffs, relating to the import or export of high technology products; (cid:127) the imposition of government controls; (cid:127) political and economic instability, including international hostilities, acts of terrorism and governmental restrictions, inflation, trade relationships and military and political alliances; (cid:127) costs and risks of deploying systems in foreign countries; (cid:127) compliance with export laws and controls in multiple jurisdictions; (cid:127) limited intellectual property rights; and (cid:127) the burden of complying with a wide variety of complex foreign laws and treaties, including unfavorable labor regulations, specifically those applicable to our European operations, as well as U.S. and local laws affecting the activities of U.S. companies abroad, including the FCPA and local anti-bribery laws. While the impact of these factors is difficult to predict, any one or more of these factors could adversely affect our operations in the future. We may lose money when we exchange foreign currency received from international sales into U.S. dollars. A significant portion of our business is conducted in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, which is our reporting currency. As a result, currency fluctuations among the U.S. dollar and the currencies in which we do business have caused and will continue to cause foreign currency transaction gains and losses. In addition, currency fluctuations could cause the price of our products to be more or less competitive than our principal competitors’ products. Currency fluctuations will increase or decrease our cost structure relative to those of our competitors, which could lessen the demand for our products and affect our competitive position. We cannot predict the effects of exchange rate fluctuations upon 23 our future operating results because of the number of currencies involved, the variability of currency exposures and the potential volatility of currency exchange rates. From time to time we enter into certain hedging transactions and/or option and foreign currency exchange contracts which are intended to offset some of the market risk associated with our sales denominated in foreign currencies. We cannot predict the effectiveness of these transactions or their impact upon our future operating results, and from time to time they may negatively affect our quarterly earnings. Our reported financial results may be adversely affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates. Our exposure to currency exchange rate fluctuations results primarily from the currency translation exposure associated with the preparation of our consolidated financial statements and from the exposure associated with transactions of our subsidiaries that are denominated in a currency other than the respective subsidiary’s functional currency. While our financial results are reported in U.S. Dollars, the financial statements of many of our subsidiaries outside the U.S. are prepared using the local currency as the functional currency. During consolidation, these results are translated into U.S. Dollars by applying appropriate exchange rates. As a result, fluctuations in the exchange rate of the U.S. Dollar relative to the local currencies in which our foreign subsidiaries report could cause significant fluctuations in our reported results. Moreover, as exchange rates vary, revenue and other operating results may differ materially from our expectations. Additionally, to the extent monetary assets and liabilities, including debt, are held in a different currency than the reporting subsidiary’s functional currency, fluctuations in currency exchange rates may have a significant impact on our reported financial results, and may lead to increased earnings volatility. We may record significant gains or losses related to both the translation of assets and liabilities held by our subsidiaries into local currencies and the remeasurement of inter-company receivables and loan balances. If we are not able to successfully integrate the businesses we acquire through mergers, acquisitions or strategic alliances, we may not be able to realize all of the cost savings and other benefits that we expect to result from the transactions and our financial results may be different than expected. Our strategy includes expanding our technology base and product offerings through selected mergers, acquisitions and strategic alliances. For example, during 2013, we completed our acquisition of Prairie Technologies, Inc. During 2012, we completed our acquisition of SkyScan N.V. and purchased the assets of the pre-clinical optical imaging business of Carestream Health, Inc. During 2011, we completed our acquisitions of Center for Tribology, Inc. and Michrom BioResources Inc. As a result of such transactions, our financial results may differ from our own or the investment community’s expectations in a given fiscal quarter, or over the long term. Successful integration of the businesses we acquire involves a number of risks, including, among others, risks related to: (cid:127) coordinating or consolidating geographically separate organizations and integrating personnel with different business backgrounds and corporate cultures; (cid:127) integrating previously autonomous departments in sales and marketing, distribution, and accounting and administrative functions, and information and management systems; (cid:127) diversion of resources and management time; (cid:127) disruption of our ongoing business; (cid:127) potential impairment of relationships with customers as a result of changes in management or otherwise arising out of such transactions; and 24 (cid:127) retention of key employees of the acquired businesses within the first 1-2 years after the acquisition, including the risk that they may compete with us subsequently. We may have difficulty developing, manufacturing and marketing the products of a newly acquired company or business in a way that enhances the performance of our combined businesses or product lines. As a result, we may not realize the value from expected synergies. If we are unable to make or complete future mergers, acquisitions or strategic alliances as a part of our growth strategy, our business development may suffer. Our growth strategy includes expanding through selected mergers, acquisitions and strategic alliances. However, we may not be able to find attractive candidates, or enter into mergers, acquisitions or strategic alliances on terms that are favorable to us, or successfully integrate the operations of companies that we acquire. If we fail to execute mergers, acquisitions and strategic alliances, our technology base may not expand as quickly and efficiently as possible. Without such complementary growth from selected mergers, acquisitions and strategic alliances, our ability to keep up with the evolving needs of the markets we serve and to meet our future performance goals could be adversely affected. In addition, we may compete with other companies for these merger, acquisition or strategic alliance candidates, which could make such a transaction more expensive for us. It may be difficult for us to implement our strategies for improving margins, profitability and cash flow. We have been pursuing a number of strategies to improve our financial performance, which in 2013 included closing certain facilities within our CAM and BEST divisions, and implementing various restructuring and outsourcing initiatives in other divisions which will continue into 2014. We may not be able to successfully implement these strategies, and these strategies may not result in the expected improvement in our margins, profitability or cash flow. If our products fail to achieve and sustain sufficient market acceptance across their broad intended range of applications, we will not generate expected revenue. Our business strategy depends on our ability to successfully commercialize a broad range of products based on our technology platforms, including magnetic resonance technology, mass spectrometry technology, gas chromatography technology, X-ray technology, spark-OES technology, atomic force microscopy technology, stylus and optical metrology technology, infrared and Raman molecular spectroscopy technology and superconducting magnet technologies for use in a variety of life science, chemistry and materials analysis applications. Some of our products have only recently been commercially launched and have achieved only limited sales to date. The commercial success of our products depends on obtaining and expanding market acceptance by a diverse array of industrial, academic, medical research and governmental customers around the world. We may fail to achieve or sustain substantial market acceptance for our products across the full range of our intended applications or in one or more of our principal intended applications. Any such failure could decrease our sales and revenue. To succeed, we must convince substantial numbers of potential customers to invest in new systems or replace their existing techniques with X-ray, magnetic resonance, mass spectrometry and vibrational spectroscopy techniques employing our systems. Limited funding available for capital acquisitions by our customers, as well as our customers’ own internal purchasing approval policies, could hinder market acceptance of our products. Our intended customers may be reluctant to make the substantial capital investment generally needed to acquire our products or to incur the training and other costs involved with replacing their existing systems with our products. We also may not be able to convince our intended customers that our systems are an attractive and cost-effective alternative to other technologies and systems for the acquisition, analysis and management of molecular information. Additionally, if ethical and other concerns surrounding the use of genetic information, gene therapy or genetically modified organisms become widespread, we may have less demand for our 25 products. Because of these and other factors, our products may fail to gain or sustain market acceptance. Our products compete in markets that are subject to rapid technological change, and one or more of the technologies underlying our products could be made obsolete by new technology. The market for discovery and analysis tools is characterized by rapid technological change and frequent new product introductions. Rapidly changing technology could make some or all of our product lines obsolete unless we are able to continually improve our existing products and develop new products. Because substantially all of our products are based on our technology platforms, including magnetic resonance technology, mass spectrometry technology, gas chromatography technology, X-ray technology, spark-OES technology, atomic force microscopy technology, stylus and optical metrology technology, infrared and Raman molecular spectroscopy technology, we are particularly vulnerable to any technological advances that would make these techniques obsolete as the basis for analytical systems in any of our markets. To meet the evolving needs of our customers, we must rapidly and continually enhance our current and planned products and services and develop and introduce new products and services. In addition, our product lines are based on complex technologies which are subject to rapid change as new technologies are developed and introduced in the marketplace. We may have difficulty in keeping abreast of the rapid changes affecting each of the different markets we serve or intend to serve. If we fail to develop and introduce products in a timely manner in response to changing technology, market demands or the requirements of our customers, our product sales may decline, and we could experience significant losses. Our new technologies and product developments may not succeed. We are currently developing a number of new key technologies and products in our operating segments, including new magnet technologies at Bruker BioSpin, new mass spectrometry technologies and applications at Bruker CALID, and new X-ray technologies at Bruker MAT, that may not succeed technically, or may not be able to be manufactured reliably and economically. Any technology, product or manufacturing ramp-up failure could decrease our opportunities for additional revenues and increased margins. Our business could be harmed if our collaborations fail to advance our product development. Demand for our products will depend in part upon the extent to which our collaborations with pharmaceutical, biotechnology and proteomics companies are successful in developing, or helping us to develop, new products and new applications for our existing products. In addition, we collaborate with academic institutions and government research laboratories on product development. We have limited or no control over the resources that any collaborator may devote to our products. Any of our present or future collaborators may not perform their obligations as expected. If we fail to enter into or maintain appropriate collaboration agreements, or if any of these events occur, we may not be able to develop some of our new products, which could materially impede our ability to generate revenue or profits. We face substantial competition. We face substantial competition in a consolidating industry and we expect that competition in all of our markets will increase further. Currently, our principal competition comes from established companies providing products using existing technologies which perform many of the same functions for which we market our products. A number of our competitors have expanded their market share in recent years through business combinations. Other companies also may choose to enter our fields in the future. Our competitors may develop or market products that are more effective or commercially attractive than our current or future products or that may render our products obsolete. Competition 26 has in the past, and is likely in the future, to subject our products to pricing pressure. Many of our competitors have more experience in the market and substantially greater financial, operational, marketing and technical resources than we do which could give them a competitive edge in areas such as research and development, production, marketing and distribution. Our ability to compete successfully will depend, in part, on our ability to develop proprietary products that reach the market in a timely manner and are technologically superior to, less expensive than, or more cost-effective than, other currently marketed products. If we are unable to recover significant development costs of one or more of our products or product lines, our business, results of operations and financial condition may suffer. We offer, and plan to continue to offer, a broad product line and incur and expect to continue to incur substantial expenses for the development of new products and enhanced versions of our existing products. Our business model calls for us to derive a significant portion of our revenues each year from products that did not exist in the previous two years. However, we may experience difficulties which may delay or prevent the successful development, introduction and marketing of new products or product enhancements. The speed of technological change in the markets we serve may prevent us from successfully marketing some or all of our products for the length of time required to recover their often significant development costs. If we fail to recover the development costs of one or more products or product lines, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be harmed. If we lose our strategic partners, our marketing efforts could be impaired. A substantial portion of our sales of selected products consists of sales to third parties who incorporate our products in their systems. These third parties are responsible for the marketing and sales of their systems. We have little or no control over their marketing and sales activities or how they use their resources. Our present or future strategic partners may or may not purchase sufficient quantities of products from us or perform appropriate marketing and sales activities. In addition, if we are unable to maintain our relationships with strategic partners, our business may suffer. Failures by our present or future strategic partners, or our inability to maintain or enter into new arrangements with strategic partners for product distribution, could materially impede the growth of our business and our ability to generate sufficient revenue and profits. If general healthcare spending patterns decline, our ability to generate revenue may suffer. We are dependent, both directly and indirectly, upon general healthcare spending patterns, particularly in the research and development budgets of the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries, as well as upon the financial condition and funding priorities of various governments and government agencies. Since our inception, both we and our academic collaborators and customers have benefited from various governmental contracts and research grants. Whether we or our academic collaborators will continue to be able to attract these grants depends not only on the quality of our products, but also on general spending patterns of public institutions. Any reduction in the capital resources or government funding of our customers could reduce our sales and impede our ability to generate revenue. A significant portion of our sales are capital purchases by our customers. The spending policies of our customers could have a significant effect on the demand for our products. These policies are based on a wide variety of factors, including the resources available to make purchases, the spending priorities among various types of equipment, policies regarding spending during recessionary periods and changes in the political climate. Any changes in capital spending or changes in the capital budgets of our customers could significantly reduce demand for our products. The capital resources of our life science and other corporate customers may be limited by the availability of equity or debt financing. Any 27 significant decline in research and development expenditures by our life science customers could significantly decrease our sales. In addition, a substantial portion of our sales are to non-profit and government entities, which are dependent on government support for scientific research. Any decline in this support could decrease the ability of these customers to purchase our products. Disruptions at any of our manufacturing facilities could adversely affect our business. We have manufacturing facilities located in the U.S., Europe and Japan. Many of our products are developed and manufactured at single locations, with limited alternate facilities. If we experience any significant disruption of those facilities for any reason, such as strikes or other labor unrest, power interruptions, fire, earthquakes, or other events beyond our control, we may be unable to manufacture the relevant products at previous levels or at all. During 2013, we closed facilities within our CAM and BEST divisions and implemented various restructuring and outsourcing initiatives that will continue into 2014. A reduction or interruption in manufacturing could harm our customer relationships, impede our ability to generate revenues from our backlog or obtain new orders and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. Our operations are dependent upon a limited number of suppliers and contract manufacturers. We currently purchase components used in our products from a limited number of outside suppliers. Our reliance on a limited number of suppliers could result in time delays associated with redesigning a product due to an inability to obtain an adequate supply of required components and reduced control over pricing, quality and timely delivery. Any of these factors could adversely affect our revenues and profitability. In particular, our X-ray microanalysis business, which manufactures and sells accessories for electron microscopes, is partially dependent on cooperation from larger manufacturers of electron microscopes. Additionally, our elemental analysis business purchases certain optical detectors from a single supplier, PerkinElmer, Inc., the sole supplier of these detector components. Bruker CALID purchases detectors and power supplies from sole or limited source suppliers and its focal plane array detectors from a single supplier, Lockheed Martin Corporation. Similarly, Bruker BioSpin obtains various components from sole or limited source suppliers and BEST obtains various raw materials and uses key production equipment from sole or limited source suppliers or subcontractors. There are limited, if any, available alternatives to these suppliers. The existence of shortages of these components or the failure of delivery with regard to these components could have a material adverse effect upon our revenues and margins. In addition, price increases from these suppliers or subcontractors could have a material adverse effect upon our gross margins. Because of the scarcity of some components, we may be unable to obtain an adequate supply of components, or we may be required to pay higher prices or to purchase components of lesser quality. Any delay or interruption in the supply of these or other components could impair our ability to manufacture and deliver our products, harm our reputation and cause a reduction in our revenues. In addition, any increase in the cost of the components that we use in our products could make our products less competitive and decrease our gross margins. We may not be able to obtain sufficient quantities of required components on the same or substantially the same terms. Additionally, consolidations among our suppliers could result in other sole source suppliers for us in the future. Supply shortages and increasing prices of raw materials could adversely affect the gross margins and profitability of our Bruker BioSpin subsidiary, and of our Bruker Energy & Supercon Technologies business. The last few years have seen periodic supply shortages and sharp increases in the prices for various raw materials, in part due to high demand from developing countries. Bruker BioSpin and BEST rely on some of these materials for the production of their products. In particular, for its superconducting magnet production, both for the horizontal and vertical magnet series, Bruker BioSpin relies on the availability of copper, steel and the metallic raw materials for traditional low-temperature 28 superconducting wires. Similarly, BEST relies on the availability of niobium titanium for its production of low-temperature superconducting materials and devices. Higher prices for these commodities will increase the production cost of superconducting wires and superconducting magnets and may adversely affect gross margins. The prices of copper and certain other raw materials used for superconductors have increased significantly over the last decade. Since copper is a main constituent of low temperature superconductors, this may affect the price of superconducting wire. This type of increase would have an immediate effect on the production costs of superconducting magnets and may negatively affect the profit margins for those products. In addition, an increase in raw material cost affects the production cost of the superconducting wire produced by BEST and of superconducting wire used by Bruker BioSpin. The demand for helium has also risen sharply over the last decade, leading to a global supply shortage. The superconducting magnets used in magnetic resonance rely on liquid helium for their operation. High global demand, in combination with periodic supply shortages, has caused prices for liquid helium to rise significantly. This has an adverse effect on the operating costs for magnetic resonance equipment, and may impede sales of superconducting magnets, or of systems that use superconducting magnets, such as our NMR, MRI, certain EPR and FTMS systems. Even if our customer orders are not affected, delayed liquid helium deliveries can lead to delays in systems acceptance, revenue recognition and payment for such magnets or systems which could impact our profitability in any particular period. If limited helium availability continues to drive up pricing, our margins and profitability could be adversely affected. New regulations related to ‘‘conflict minerals’’ may cause us to incur additional expenses and could limit the supply and increase the cost of certain metals used in manufacturing our products. On August 22, 2012, the SEC adopted a new rule requiring disclosures by public companies of specified minerals, known as conflict minerals, that are necessary to the functionality or production of products manufactured or contracted to be manufactured. The new rule, which is effective for 2013 and requires a disclosure report to be filed by May 31, 2014, requires us to perform due diligence, and to disclose and report whether or not such minerals originate from the Democratic Republic of Congo or an adjoining country. The new rule could affect sourcing at competitive prices and availability in sufficient quantities of certain minerals used in the manufacture of our products, including tantalum, tin, gold and tungsten. The number of suppliers who provide conflict-free minerals may be limited. In addition, there may be material costs associated with complying with the disclosure requirements, such as costs related to determining the source of certain minerals used in our products, as well as costs of possible changes to products, processes, or sources of supply as a consequence of such verification activities. As our supply chain is complex and we use contract manufacturers for some of our products, we may not be able to sufficiently verify the origins of the relevant minerals used in our products through the due diligence procedures that we implement, which may harm our reputation. In addition, we may encounter challenges to satisfy those customers who require that all of the components of our products be certified as conflict-free, which could place us at a competitive disadvantage if we are unable to do so. Our manufacture and sale of products could lead to product liability claims for which we could have substantial liability. The manufacture and sale of our products exposes us to product liability claims if any of our products cause injury or are found otherwise unsuitable during manufacturing, marketing, sale or customer use. In particular, if one of our CBRNE detection products malfunctions, this could lead to civilian or military casualties in a time of unrest, exposing us to increased potential for high-profile liability. If our CBRNE detection products malfunction by generating a false-positive to a potential 29 threat, we could be exposed to liabilities associated with actions taken that otherwise would not have been required. Additionally, the nuclear magnetic resonance, research magnetic resonance imaging, Fourier transform mass spectrometry and certain electron paramagnetic resonance magnets of Bruker BioSpin utilize high magnet fields and cryogenics to operate at approximately 4 Kelvin, the temperature of liquid helium. There is an inherent risk of potential product liability due to the existence of these high magnetic fields, associated stray fields outside the magnet, and the handling of the cryogens associated with superconducting magnets. In addition, our MALDI Biotyper product has an IVD-CE mark and is used for the identification of microorganisms. Misidentification or a false-negative of certain bacteria, yeasts or fungi could lead to inappropriate treatment for patients, and could expose us to product liability claims. A successful product liability claim brought against us in excess of, or outside the coverage of, our insurance coverage could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We may not be able to maintain product liability insurance on acceptable terms, if at all, and insurance may not provide adequate coverage against potential liabilities. Responding to claims relating to improper handling, storage or disposal of hazardous chemicals and radioactive and biological materials which we use could be time consuming and costly. We use controlled hazardous and radioactive materials in our business and generate wastes that are regulated as hazardous wastes under U.S. federal, and Massachusetts, California, Washington and Wisconsin state, environmental and atomic energy regulatory laws and under equivalent provisions of law in those jurisdictions in which our research and manufacturing facilities are located. Our use of these substances and materials is subject to stringent, and periodically changing, regulation that can impose costly compliance obligations on us and have the potential to adversely affect our manufacturing activities. The risk of accidental contamination or injury from these materials cannot be completely eliminated. If an accident with these substances occurs, we could be held liable for any damages that result, in addition to incurring clean-up costs and liabilities, which can be substantial. Additionally, an accident could damage our research and manufacturing facilities resulting in delays and increased costs. In addition to the risks applicable to our life science and materials analysis products, our CBRNE detection products are subject to a number of additional risks, including lengthy product development and contract negotiation periods and certain risks inherent in long-term government contracts. Our CBRNE detection products are subject to many of the same risks associated with our life science products, including vulnerability to rapid technological change, dependence on mass spectrometry and other technologies and substantial competition. In addition, our CBRNE detection products and certain FT-IR products are generally sold to government agencies under long-term contracts. These contracts generally involve lengthy pre-contract negotiations and product development. We may be required to devote substantial working capital and other resources prior to obtaining product orders. As a result, we may incur substantial costs before we recognize revenue from these products. Moreover, in return for larger, longer-term contracts, our customers for these products often demand more stringent acceptance criteria. These criteria may also cause delays in our ability to recognize revenue from sales of these products. Furthermore, we may not be able to accurately predict in advance our costs to fulfill our obligations under these long-term contracts. If we fail to accurately predict our costs, due to inflation or other factors, we could incur significant losses. Also, the presence or absence of such contracts may cause substantial variation in our results of operations between fiscal periods and, as a result, our results of operations for any given fiscal period may not be predictive of our results for subsequent fiscal periods. The resulting uncertainty may have an adverse impact on our stock price. 30 We are subject to existing and potential additional regulation and government inquiry, which can impose burdens on our operations and narrow the markets for our products. We are subject, both directly and indirectly, to the adverse impact of existing and potential future government regulation of our operations and markets. For example, exportation of our products, particularly our CBRNE detection products, is subject to strict regulatory control in a number of jurisdictions. The failure to satisfy export control criteria or obtain necessary clearances could delay or prevent shipment of products, which could adversely affect our revenues and profitability. In addition, as a result of our international operations, we are subject to compliance with various laws and regulations, including the U.S. FCPA and other anti-bribery laws in the jurisdictions in which we do business, which generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries or agents from engaging in bribery or making improper payments to foreign officials or their agents. Violations of these laws and regulations could result in severe fines and penalties, criminal sanctions, and restrictions on our business conduct and on our ability to offer our products in one or more countries, and could also materially affect our reputation, our relationships with existing customers, distributors and agents, our ability to obtain new customers and partners and our operating results. Moreover, the life sciences industry, which is the market for our principal products, has historically been heavily regulated. There are, for example, laws in several jurisdictions restricting research in genetic engineering, which can operate to narrow our markets. Given the evolving nature of this industry, legislative bodies or regulatory authorities may adopt additional regulation that adversely affects our market opportunities. Our business is also directly affected by a wide variety of government regulations applicable to business enterprises generally and to companies operating in the life sciences industry in particular. We note that, as a result of developing and selling products which are the subject of such regulation, we have been, are, and expect to be in the future, subject to inquiries from the government agencies which enforce these regulations, including the U.S. Department of State, the U.S. Department of Commerce, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the U.S. Department of Justice, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Federal Trade Commission, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection and the U.S. Department of Defense, among others, as well as from state or foreign governments and their departments and agencies. As a result, from time to time, the attention of our management and other resources may be diverted to attend to these inquiries. In addition, failure to comply with these regulations or obtain or maintain necessary permits and licenses could result in a variety of fines or other censures or an interruption in our business operations which may have a negative impact on our ability to generate revenues. Our success depends on our ability to operate without infringing or misappropriating the proprietary rights of others. Our commercial success depends on avoiding the infringement of other parties’ patents and proprietary rights as well as avoiding the breach of any licenses relating to our technologies and products. Given that there may be patents of which we are unaware, particularly in the U.S. where patent applications are confidential, avoidance of patent infringement may be difficult. Various third- parties hold patents which may relate to our technology, and we may be found in the future to infringe these or other patents or proprietary rights of third parties, either with products we are currently marketing or developing or with new products which we may develop in the future. If a third party holding rights under a patent successfully asserts an infringement claim with respect to any of our current or future products, we may be prevented from manufacturing or marketing our infringing product in the country or countries covered by the patent we infringe, unless we can obtain a license from the patent holder. We may not be able to obtain a license on commercially reasonable terms, if at all, especially if the patent holder is a competitor. In addition, even if we can obtain the license, it may be non-exclusive, which will permit others to practice the same technology licensed to us. We also may be required to pay substantial damages to the patent holder in the event of an infringement. Under 31 some circumstances in the U.S., these damages could include damages equal to triple the actual damages the patent holder incurs. If we have supplied infringing products to third parties for marketing by them or licensed third parties to manufacture, use or market infringing products, we may be obligated to indemnify these third parties for any damages they may be required to pay to the patent holder and for any losses the third parties may sustain themselves as the result of lost sales or license payments they are required to make to the patent holder. Any successful infringement action brought against us may also adversely affect marketing of the infringing product in other markets not covered by the infringement action, as well as our marketing of other products based on similar technology. Furthermore, we will suffer adverse consequences from a successful infringement action against us even if the action is subsequently reversed on appeal, nullified through another action or resolved by settlement with the patent holder. The damages or other remedies awarded, if any, may be significant. As a result, any successful infringement action against us may harm our business. If we are unable to effectively protect our intellectual property, third parties may use our technology, which would impair our ability to compete in our markets. Our continued success will depend in significant part on our ability to obtain and maintain meaningful patent protection for our products throughout the world. We rely on patents to protect a significant part of our intellectual property and to enhance our competitive position. However, our presently pending or future patent applications may not issue as patents, and any patent previously issued to us may be challenged, invalidated, held unenforceable or circumvented. Furthermore, the claims in patents which have been issued, or which may be issued to us in the future, may not be sufficiently broad to prevent third parties from producing competing products similar to our products. In addition, the laws of various foreign countries in which we compete may not protect our intellectual property to the same extent as do the laws of the U.S. Failure to obtain adequate patent protection for our proprietary technology could materially impair our ability to be commercially competitive. In addition to patent protection, we also rely on the protection of trade secrets, know-how and confidential and proprietary information. To maintain the confidentiality of trade secrets and proprietary information, we generally seek to enter into confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants and strategic partners upon the commencement of a relationship with us. However, we may not obtain these agreements in all circumstances. In the event of unauthorized use or disclosure of this information, these agreements, even if obtained, may not provide meaningful protection for our trade secrets or other confidential information. In addition, adequate remedies may not exist in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure of this information. The loss or exposure of our trade secrets and other proprietary information would impair our competitive advantages and could have a material adverse effect on our operating results, financial condition and future growth prospects. Furthermore, others may have, or may in the future independently develop, substantially similar or superior know-how and technology. We may be involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our patents that are brought by us which could be expensive and time consuming and, if determined adversely, could adversely affect our patent position. In order to protect or enforce our patent rights, we may initiate patent litigation against third parties, and we may be similarly sued by others. We may also become subject to interference proceedings conducted in the patent and trademark offices of various countries to determine the priority of inventions. The defense and prosecution, if necessary, of intellectual property suits, interference proceedings and related legal and administrative proceedings is costly and diverts our technical and management personnel from their normal responsibilities. We may not prevail in any of these suits. An adverse determination of any litigation or defense proceedings could put our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and could put our patent applications at risk of not issuing. 32 Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation. In addition, during the course of this kind of litigation, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments in the litigation. If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a substantial negative effect on the trading price of our common stock. We may not be able to maintain our sales and service staff to meet demand for our products and services. Our future revenue and profitability will depend in part on our ability to maintain our team of marketing and service personnel. Because our products are technical in nature, we believe that our marketing, sales and support staff must have scientific or technical expertise and experience. Competition for employees with these skills is intense. We may not be able to continue to attract and retain sufficient qualified sales and service people, and we may not be able to maintain and develop efficient and effective sales, marketing and support department. If we fail to continue to attract or retain qualified people, then our business could suffer. We plan above market level future growth, and there is a risk that we will not be able to manage this growth. Our success will depend on the expansion of our operations. Effective growth management will place increased demands on our management, operational and financial resources. To manage our future growth, we must expand our facilities, augment our operational, financial and management systems, and hire and train additional qualified personnel. Our failure to manage this growth effectively could impair our ability to generate revenue or could cause our expenses to increase more rapidly than revenue, resulting in operating losses. Our debt may adversely affect our cash flow and may restrict our investment opportunities or limit our activities. As of December 31, 2013, we had outstanding an aggregate principal amount of debt totaling approximately $355.0 million, including $240.0 million of senior unsecured notes, $112.5 million of long-term borrowings under our revolving loan facility and $2.5 million of other debt. We also had the ability to borrow an additional $180.7 million from our existing credit facilities. Most of our outstanding debt is in the U.S. and there are substantial cash requirements in the U.S. to service debt interest obligations, fund operations and capital expenditures, and finance potential acquisitions. Our ability to satisfy our debt obligations depends on our future operating performance and on economic, financial, competitive and other factors beyond our control. Our business may not generate sufficient cash flow to meet these obligations. If we are unable to service our debt or obtain additional financing, we may be forced to delay strategic acquisitions, capital expenditures or research and development expenditures. We may not be able to obtain additional financing on terms acceptable to us or at all. Furthermore, a majority of our cash is generated from foreign operations, with $419.8 million, or 95.7% of our cash held by foreign subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013. Our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely impacted if we are unable to maintain a sufficient level of cash flow in the U.S. to address our funding requirements through (1) cash from operations, (2) efficient and timely repatriation of cash from overseas or (3) other sources obtained at an acceptable cost. Additionally, the agreements governing our debt require that we maintain certain financial ratios related to maximum leverage and minimum interest coverage, and contain affirmative and negative covenants that restrict our activities by, among other limitations, limiting our ability to make certain payments; incur additional debt; incur certain liens; make certain investments, including derivative agreements; merge, consolidate, sell or transfer all or substantially all of our assets; and enter into certain transactions with affiliates. Our ability to comply with these financial restrictions and covenants is dependent on our future performance, which is subject to prevailing economic conditions and other 33 factors, including factors that are beyond our control such as foreign exchange rates and interest rates. Our failure to comply with any of these restrictions or covenants may result in an event of default under the applicable debt instrument, which could permit acceleration of the debt under the facility and require us to prepay the debt before its scheduled due date. Goodwill, intangible assets and other long-lived assets are subject to impairment. We have recorded goodwill, intangible assets and other long-lived assets which must be periodically evaluated for potential impairment. We assess the realizability of the reported goodwill, intangible assets and other long-lived assets annually, as well as whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the assets may be impaired. These events or circumstances generally include operating losses or a significant decline in the earnings associated with the reporting segment these assets are reported within. A decline in our stock price and market capitalization may also cause us to consider whether goodwill, intangible assets and other long-lived assets may require an impairment assessment. Our ability to realize the value of these assets will depend on the future cash flows of the reporting segment in addition to how well we integrate the businesses we acquire. During 2012, the Company recorded an impairment loss of $23.8 million for goodwill, intangible assets and other long-lived assets. Various international tax risks could adversely affect our earnings and cash flows. We are subject to international tax risks. Distributions of earnings and other payments received from our subsidiaries may be subject to withholding taxes imposed by the countries where they are operating or are formed. If these foreign countries do not have income tax treaties with the U.S. or the countries where our subsidiaries are incorporated, we could be subject to high rates of withholding taxes on these distributions and payments. We could also be subject to being taxed twice on income related to operations in these non-treaty countries. Because we are unable to reduce the taxable income of one operating company with losses incurred by another operating company located in another country, we may have a higher effective income tax rate than that of other companies in our industry. The amount of the credit that we may claim against our U.S. federal income tax for foreign income taxes is subject to many limitations which may significantly restrict our ability to claim a credit for all of the foreign taxes we pay. We currently have reserves established on the statutory books of certain international locations. Within our audited consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, the potential tax liabilities associated with these reserves have been recorded as long-term deferred tax liabilities. If these reserves are challenged, and we are unable to successfully defend the need for such reserves, these liabilities could become current resulting in a negative impact to our anticipated cash flows from operations over the next twelve months. The unpredictability and fluctuation of our quarterly results may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock. Our revenues and results of operations have in the past and may in the future vary from quarter to quarter due to a number of factors, many of which are outside of our control and any of which may cause our stock price to fluctuate. The primary factors that may affect us include the following: (cid:127) the timing of sales of our products and services; (cid:127) the timing of recognizing revenue and deferred revenue under U.S. GAAP; (cid:127) changes in our pricing policies or the pricing policies of our competitors; (cid:127) increases in sales and marketing, product development or administration expenses; (cid:127) the mix of services provided by us and third-party contractors; 34 (cid:127) our ability to attain and maintain quality levels for our products; (cid:127) costs related to acquisitions of technology or businesses; and (cid:127) the effectiveness of transactions entered into to hedge the risks associated with foreign currency and interest rate fluctuations. Historically, we have experienced a decrease in revenue in the first, second and third quarters of each fiscal year relative to the prior fourth quarter, which we believe is due to our customers’ budgeting cycles. Quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our results of operations should not be relied on as an indication of our future performance. It is likely that in some future quarters, our results of operations may be below the expectations of public market analysts and investors. In this event, the price of our common stock may fall. Existing stockholders have significant influence over us. As of February 20, 2014, Laukien family members, including our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Frank Laukien, Director and Executive Chairman of the Bruker BioSpin Group and Joerg Laukien, a director and employee of the Company, owned, in the aggregate, approximately 34% of our outstanding common stock. As a result, these stockholders will be able to exercise substantial influence over all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. This could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of our company and will make some transactions difficult to accomplish without the support of these stockholders. Other companies may have difficulty acquiring us, even if doing so would benefit our stockholders, due to provisions under our corporate charter and bylaws, as well as Delaware law. Provisions in our certificate of incorporation, as amended, and our bylaws, as well as Delaware law could make it more difficult for other companies to acquire us, even if doing so would benefit our stockholders. Our certificate of incorporation, as amended, and bylaws contain the following provisions, among others, which may inhibit an acquisition of our company by a third party: (cid:127) a staggered Board of Directors, where stockholders elect only a minority of the board each year; (cid:127) advance notification procedures for matters to be brought before stockholder meetings; (cid:127) a limitation on who may call stockholder meetings; and (cid:127) the ability of our Board of Directors to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock without a stockholder vote. ITEM 1B UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS We have not received any written comments from the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding our periodic or current reports that (1) we believe are material, (2) were issued not less than 180 days before the end of our 2013 fiscal year end, and (3) remain unresolved. ITEM 2 PROPERTIES We believe that our existing principal facilities are well maintained and in good operating condition and that they are adequate for our foreseeable business needs. During 2013, we closed facilities within our CAM and BEST divisions, as well as implemented various restructuring and outsourcing initiatives. We will continue to assess restructuring and outsourcing initiatives and the impact on our properties in the future. 35 In addition to the principal facilities noted below we lease additional facilities for sales, applications and service support in various countries throughout the world including Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, Czech Republic, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Hong Kong, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Ukraine, the United Kingdom and the U.S. If we should require additional or alternative facilities, we believe that such facilities can be obtained on short notice at competitive rates. The location and general character of our principal properties by operating segment are as follows: BSI Segment: Bruker BioSpin’s six principal facilities are located in Rheinstetten, Ettlingen and Karlsruhe, Germany; Faellanden, Switzerland; Wissembourg, France; and Billerica, Massachusetts, U.S.A. These facilities, which incorporate manufacturing, research and development, application and demonstration, marketing and sales and administration functions for the businesses of Bruker BioSpin, include: (cid:127) an owned 475,000 square foot facility in Rheinstetten, Germany; (cid:127) an owned 360,000 square foot facility in Ettlingen, Germany; (cid:127) an owned 345,000 square foot facility in Karlsruhe, Germany; (cid:127) an owned 300,000 square foot facility and a leased 70,000 square foot facility in Faellanden, Switzerland; (cid:127) an owned 120,000 square foot facility, a leased 65,000 square foot facility and a leased 18,000 square foot facility in Wissembourg, France; and (cid:127) a leased 50,000 square foot facility, a leased 30,000 square foot facility in Billerica, Massachusetts, U.S.A. Bruker CALID’s six principal facilities are located in Bremen, Ettlingen and Leipzig, Germany; Billerica, Massachusetts, U.S.A.; Fremont, California U.S.A.; and The Woodlands, Texas, U.S.A. These facilities, which incorporate manufacturing, research and development, application and demonstration, marketing and sales and administration functions for the mass spectrometry and CBRNE businesses of Bruker CALID, include: (cid:127) an owned 270,500 square foot facility in Bremen, Germany; (cid:127) an owned 165,000 square foot facility in Ettlingen, Germany; (cid:127) an owned 155,000 square foot facility in Leipzig, Germany; (cid:127) an owned 90,000 square foot facility and a leased 26,000 square foot facility in Billerica, Massachusetts, U.S.A.; (cid:127) a leased 36,000 square foot facility in Fremont, California, U.S.A.; and (cid:127) a leased 23,000 square foot facility in The Woodlands, Texas, U.S.A. Bruker MAT’s five principal facilities are located in Karlsruhe, Berlin and Kalkar, Germany; Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.; and Santa Barbara, California, U.S.A. These facilities, which incorporate manufacturing, research and development, application and demonstration, marketing and sales and administration functions for the businesses of Bruker MAT, include: (cid:127) an owned 76,000 square foot facility and an owned 46,000 square foot facility in Karlsruhe, Germany; (cid:127) an owned 100,000 square foot facility in Santa Barbara, California, U.S.A.; 36 (cid:127) an owned 87,000 square foot facility in Berlin, Germany; (cid:127) an owned 43,000 square foot facility in Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.; and (cid:127) an owned 26,000 square foot facility in Kalkar, Germany BEST Segment: BEST’s five principal facilities are located in Hanau, Bergisch Gladbach, Cologne and Alzenau, Germany and Perth, Scotland. These facilities, which incorporate manufacturing, research and development, application and demonstration, marketing and sales and administration functions for the business of BEST, include: (cid:127) an owned 47,000 square foot facility in Perth, Scotland; (cid:127) a leased 174,000 square foot facility in Hanau, Germany; (cid:127) a leased 66,000 square foot facility in Bergisch Gladbach, Germany; (cid:127) a leased 43,000 square foot facility in Cologne, Germany; and (cid:127) a leased 31,000 square foot facility in Alzenau, Germany. ITEM 3 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS On April 9, 2013, PerkinElmer, Inc., Caliper Life Sciences, Inc., Xenogen Corporation and the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University filed an action in the U.S. District Court, California Northern District (Oakland) against the Company and, as subsequently amended, the Company’s Bruker BioSpin Corporation subsidiary, alleging breach of a certain agreement assumed by Bruker BioSpin Corporation in connection with its purchase of the X-ray and optical imaging systems business of Carestream Health, Inc. in October 2012. The suit also claimed that the Company and Bruker BioSpin Corporation engaged in conduct that infringed and/or induced infringement of certain patents held by or licensed to the plaintiffs. Subsequent to the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with the plaintiffs to resolve all claims. The settlement amount was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2013 and was immaterial to the consolidated financial statements of the Company. On September 21, 2012, Vertical Analytics LLC filed an action in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware against Bruker AXS Inc. (‘‘Bruker AXS’’). The complaint alleged that Bruker AXS infringed, induced infringement, or contributed to the infringement of certain U.S. patents related to X-ray diffraction analysis held by Vertical Analytics LLC. During the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with Vertical Analytics LLC to resolve all claims. The settlement amount was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2013 and was immaterial to the consolidated financial statements of the Company. On November 4, 2011, Hyphenated Systems, LLC filed an action in California Superior Court, Santa Clara County, against the Company and Veeco Metrology, Inc. in connection with certain agreements entered into prior and subsequent to the Company’s acquisition of all of the shares of Veeco Metrology, Inc. in October 2010. Upon the closing of the acquisition, Veeco Metrology, Inc. was renamed Bruker Nano, Inc. During the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with Hyphenated Systems, LLC to resolve all claims. The settlement amount was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2013 and was immaterial to the consolidated financial statements of the Company. As previously reported, the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors, assisted by independent outside counsel and an independent forensic consulting firm, conducted an internal investigation in response to anonymous communications received by the Company alleging improper 37 conduct in connection with the China operations of the Company’s Bruker Optics subsidiary. The Audit Committee’s investigation, which began in 2011 and was completed in the first quarter of 2012, included a review of compliance by Bruker Optics and its employees in China and Hong Kong with the requirements of the FCPA and other applicable laws and regulations. The investigation found evidence indicating that payments were made that improperly benefited employees or agents of government-owned enterprises in China and Hong Kong. The investigation also found evidence that certain employees of Bruker Optics in China and Hong Kong failed to comply with the Company’s policies and standards of conduct. As a result, the Company took personnel actions, including the termination of certain individuals. The Company also terminated its business relationships with certain third party agents, implemented an enhanced FCPA compliance program, and strengthened the financial controls and oversight at its subsidiaries operating in China and Hong Kong. During 2011, the Company also initiated a review of the China operations of its other subsidiaries, with the assistance of an independent audit firm. On the basis of the review conducted to date, the Company has identified additional employees in Bruker subsidiaries operating in China who failed to comply with the Company’s policies and standards of conduct, and has taken additional personnel actions at certain of its subsidiaries as a result. The review is ongoing and no conclusions can be drawn at this time as to its final outcome. The Company voluntarily contacted the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and the United States Department of Justice in August 2011 to advise both agencies of the internal investigation by the Audit Committee regarding the China operations of the Company’s Bruker Optics subsidiary. In October 2011, the Company also reported the existence of that internal investigation to the Hong Kong Joint Financial Intelligence Unit and ICAC. The Company has cooperated with the United States federal agencies and Hong Kong government authorities with respect to their inquiries and has provided documents and/or made witnesses available in response to requests from the governmental authorities reviewing this matter. The Company intends to continue to cooperate with these agencies in connection with their inquiries. At this time the Company cannot reasonably assess the timing or outcome of these matters or their effect, if any, on the Company’s business. The FCPA and related statutes and regulations provide for potential monetary penalties as well as criminal and civil sanctions in connection with FCPA violations. It is possible that monetary penalties and other sanctions could be assessed by the Federal government in connection with these matters. Additionally, to the extent any payments are determined to be illegal by local government authorities, civil or criminal penalties may be assessed by such authorities and the Company’s ability to conduct business in that jurisdiction may be negatively impacted. At this time, the Company cannot predict the extent to which the SEC, the DOJ, the ICAC or any other governmental authorities will pursue administrative, civil injunctive or criminal proceedings, the imposition of fines or penalties or other remedies or sanctions. Given the current status of the inquiries from these agencies, the Company cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of possible loss that may result from any proceedings that may be commenced by the SEC, the DOJ, the ICAC or any other governmental authorities. Accordingly, no provision with respect to such matters has been recorded in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Any adverse findings or other negative outcomes from any such proceedings could have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements in future periods. In the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, $6.1 million, $11.1 million and $4.3 million, respectively, was recorded for legal and other professional services incurred related to the internal investigation of these matters. ITEM 4 MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE Not applicable. 38 PART II ITEM 5 MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES Market Prices Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol ‘‘BRKR.’’ The following table sets forth, for the period indicated, the high and low sales prices for our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq Global Select Market: First Quarter 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Second Quarter 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Third Quarter 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fourth Quarter 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . First Quarter 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Second Quarter 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Third Quarter 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fourth Quarter 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . High Low $19.46 19.17 21.11 21.33 $16.30 17.10 14.29 15.67 $15.66 15.70 15.41 17.75 $12.24 12.66 9.91 11.58 As of February 20, 2014, there were approximately 90 holders of record of our common stock. This number does not include individual beneficial owners of shares held in nominee name or within clearinghouse positions of brokerage firms and banks. Dividends We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our capital stock. We currently anticipate that we will retain all available funds for use in our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The terms of certain debt facilities restrict our ability to pay cash dividends. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities There were no unregistered sales of equity securities during the fourth quarter of 2013. Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities There were no issuer purchases made by or on behalf of the Company or any ‘‘affiliated purchaser’’ as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Exchange Act, of shares of our common stock during the fourth quarter of 2013. 39 Stock Price Performance Graph The graph below shows the cumulative stockholder return, assuming the investment of $100 (and the reinvestment of any dividends thereafter) for the period beginning on December 31, 2008 and ending on December 31, 2013, for our common stock, stocks traded on Nasdaq and a peer group consisting of companies traded on Nasdaq with Standard Industry Classification, or SIC, codes from 3800 to 3899, representing measuring instruments, photo, medical and optical goods and timepieces. The stock price performance of Bruker Corporation shown in the following graph is not indicative of future stock price performance. Comparison of 5 Year Cumulative Total Return Assumes Initial Investment of $100 December 2013 600.00 500.00 400.00 300.00 200.00 100.00 0.00 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Bruker Corporation NASDAQ Stock Market (US Companies) NASDAQ Stocks (SIC 3800-3899) 25FEB201423432383 Cumulative Total Return Index for: 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Bruker Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NASDAQ Stock Market (US companies) . . . . . . NASDAQ Stock Market (US companies , SIC 3800-3899—measuring instruments, photo, med & optical goods, timepieces) . . . . . . . . . . $100.0 100.0 $298.5 143.7 $410.9 170.2 $307.4 171.1 $377.2 202.4 $489.4 281.9 100.0 127.6 153.2 153.1 173.1 217.0 The data for this performance graph was compiled by Zack’s Investment Research, Inc. and is used with their permission. 40 ITEM 6 SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA The consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income data for each of the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this report. The data presented below was derived from financial statements that were prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and should be read with the consolidated and combined financial statements, including the notes thereto, and ‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations’’ included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Year Ended December 31, 2013 (1) 2012 (2) 2011 2010 2009 (in millions, except per share data) Consolidated/Combined Statements of Income Data: Product revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,611.4 $1,556.5 $1,445.6 $1,145.4 $ 985.3 122.4 Service revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.8 Other revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,114.5 Total revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 977.8 Total costs and operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136.7 Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81.2 Net income attributable to Bruker Corporation . . . . . . Net income per common share attributable to Bruker 151.1 8.4 1,304.9 1,149.2 155.7 95.4 210.0 24.9 1,791.4 1,635.4 156.0 77.5 219.3 8.7 1,839.4 1,691.2 148.2 80.1 194.8 11.3 1,651.7 1,496.1 155.6 92.3 Corporation shareholders: Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.48 $ 0.48 $ 0.47 $ 0.46 $ 0.56 $ 0.55 $ 0.58 $ 0.58 $ 0.50 0.49 (1) 2013 includes restructuring costs of $25.3 million. (2) 2012 includes an impairment of assets of $23.8 million, comprising of goodwill, definite-lived intangible assets and other long-lived assets. Year Ended December 31, 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 (in millions) Consolidated/Combined Balance Sheet Data: Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Working capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 438.7 783.3 1,988.3 355.0 135.2 850.2 $ 310.6 627.9 1,856.4 337.2 129.0 709.7 $ 246.0 438.3 1,710.5 303.1 110.4 624.9 $ 230.4 219.6 1,549.8 301.0 104.3 527.4 $ 207.1 333.3 1,172.3 137.7 97.3 418.8 41 ITEM 7 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, or MD&A, describes the principal factors affecting the results of our operations, financial condition and changes in financial condition, as well as our critical accounting policies and estimates. Our MD&A is organized as follows: (cid:127) Executive Overview. This section provides a general description and history of our business, a brief discussion of our reportable segments, significant recent developments in our business and other opportunities, and challenges and risks that may impact our business in the future. (cid:127) Critical Accounting Policies. This section discusses the accounting estimates that are considered important to our financial condition and results of operations and require us to exercise subjective or complex judgments in their application. All of our significant accounting policies, including our critical accounting policies and estimates, are summarized in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. (cid:127) Results of Operations. This section provides our analysis of the significant line items on our consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to the year ended December 31, 2012 and for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to the year ended December 31, 2011. (cid:127) Liquidity and Capital Resources. This section provides an analysis of our liquidity and cash flow and a discussion of our outstanding debt and commitments. (cid:127) Transactions with Related Parties. This section summarizes transactions with principal shareholders and directors. EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW Business Overview Bruker Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries design, manufacture, service and distribute proprietary life science and materials research systems based on our technology platforms, including magnetic resonance technologies, mass spectrometry technologies, gas chromatography technologies, infrared and Raman molecular spectroscopy technologies, X-ray technologies, spark-optical emission spectroscopy, atomic force microscopy, and stylus and optical metrology technology. We sell a broad range of field analytical systems for chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear and explosive (CBRNE) detection. We also develop and manufacture low temperature and high temperature superconducting wire products and superconducting wire and superconducting devices for use in advanced magnet technology, physics research and energy applications. Our diverse customer base includes life science, pharmaceutical, biotechnology and molecular diagnostic research companies, academic institutions, advanced materials and semiconductor industries and government agencies. Our corporate headquarters are located in Billerica, Massachusetts. We maintain major technical and manufacturing centers in Europe, North America and Japan and we have sales offices located throughout the world. Our business strategy is to capitalize on our ability to innovate and generate above market revenue growth, both organically and through acquisitions. Our revenue growth strategy combined with anticipated improvements to our gross profit margins and increased leverage on our research and development, sales and marketing and distribution investments and general and administrative expenses is expected to enhance our operating margins and improve our profitability in the future. We are organized into four operating segments: the Bruker BioSpin Group, the Bruker CALID Group, the Bruker MAT Group, and Bruker Energy & Supercon Technologies (BEST) division. The Bruker BioSpin Group combines the Bruker Magnetic Resonance and Preclinical Imaging divisions and 42 designs, manufactures and distributes enabling life science tools based on magnetic resonance technology. The Bruker CALID Group combines the Bruker Life Sciences and Clinical (LSC), Bruker Chemical and Applied Markets (CAM), Bruker Detection and Bruker Optics divisions and designs, manufactures, and distributes mass spectrometry and chromatography instruments and solutions for life sciences, including proteomics, metabolomics and clinical research applications. Our mass spectrometry and chromatography instruments also provide solutions for applied markets that include food safety, environmental analysis and petrochemical analysis. Bruker CALID also designs, manufactures and distributes various analytical instruments for CBRNE detection and research, as well as analytical, research and process analysis instruments and solutions based on infrared and Raman molecular spectroscopy technologies. The Bruker MAT Group includes the Bruker AXS, Bruker Nano Surfaces, Bruker Nano Analytical and Bruker Elemental divisions and designs, manufactures and distributes advanced X-ray, spark-optical emission spectroscopy, atomic force microscopy and stylus and optical metrology instrumentation used in non-destructive molecular, materials and elemental analysis. The BEST division designs, manufactures and distributes low temperature superconductor and high temperature superconductor materials for use in advanced magnet technology and energy applications as well as linear accelerators, accelerator cavities, insertion devices, other accelerator components and specialty superconducting magnets for physics and energy research and a variety of other scientific applications. For financial reporting purposes, we aggregate the Bruker BioSpin, Bruker CALID and Bruker MAT operating segments into the Scientific Instruments (BSI) reporting segment, which represents approximately 93% of the Company’s revenues for the year ended December 31, 2013. This aggregation reflects these operating segments’ similar economic characteristics, production processes, customer services provided, types and classes of customers, methods of distribution and regulatory environments. As such, management reports its financial results based on the following segments: (cid:127) BSI. The operations of the BSI segment include the design, manufacture and distribution of advanced instrumentation and automated solutions based on magnetic resonance technology, mass spectrometry technology, gas chromatography technology, infrared and Raman molecular spectroscopy technology, X-ray technology, spark-optical emission spectroscopy technology, atomic force microscopy technology and stylus and optical metrology technology. Typical customers of the BSI segment include: pharmaceutical, biotechnology and molecular diagnostic companies; academic institutions, medical schools and other non-profit organizations; clinical microbiology laboratories; government departments and agencies; nanotechnology, semiconductor, chemical, cement, metals and petroleum companies; and food, beverage and agricultural analysis companies and laboratories. (cid:127) BEST. The operations of the BEST segment include the design, manufacture and distribution of superconducting materials, primarily metallic low temperature superconductors, for use in magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear magnetic resonance, fusion energy research and other applications, and ceramic high temperature superconductors primarily for energy grid and magnet applications. Typical customers of the BEST segment include companies in the medical industry, private and public research and development laboratories in the fields of fundamental and applied sciences and energy research, academic institutions and government agencies. The BEST segment is also developing superconductors and superconducting-enabled devices for applications in power and energy, as well as industrial processing industries. 43 Financial Overview For the year ended December 31, 2013, our revenue increased by $48.0 million, or 2.7%, to $1,839.4 million, compared to $1,791.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. Included in this change in revenue are decreases of approximately $5.3 million from the impact of foreign exchange due to the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar versus the Japanese Yen, offset by a weakening of the U.S. Dollar versus the Euro, and approximately $3.8 million attributable to recent acquisitions and divestitures. Excluding the effects of foreign exchange and our recent acquisitions and divestitures, revenue increased by $57.1 million, or 3.2%. The increase in revenue on an adjusted basis is attributable to the BSI segment, which increased by $56.6 million, or 3.4%, and the BEST segment, which increased by $6.5 million, or 4.8%, offset by intersegment eliminations. Revenue in the BSI segment on an adjusted basis reflects increased sales in the Bruker BioSpin and Bruker CALID Groups, specifically nuclear magnetic resonance products, MALDI Biotyper and Fourier transform mass spectrometry (FTMS) products sold by our LSC division and improved commercial execution by our Bruker Optics division. These increases were partially offset by declines in the Bruker MAT Group, specifically atomic force microscopy and X-ray products. The mix of products sold in the BSI segment during 2013 reflects significant quarterly variability in demand, both geographically and by end market, for our products. In particular, there was an increase in demand in academic markets, especially in Europe and Asia, offset by decreased demand from customers in industrial and microelectronics markets, particularly in Asia. We are uncertain whether the recent market conditions will continue or how our revenue derived from those market segments may be affected. Revenues in the BEST segment increased due to increased sales of low temperature superconducting wire as well as beamline and cavity device sales, partially offset by an incremental decline of $10.7 million of license revenue recognized on the sale of technology. Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $805.2 million compared to $829.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. Our gross profit margin for the year ended December 31, 2013 was 43.8%, compared with 46.3% for the year ended December 31, 2012. Excluding the effects of amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets and other acquisition-related costs and restructuring charges totaling, in the aggregate, $27.3 million and $21.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, gross profit margins decreased to 45.3% for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared with 47.5% for the year ended December 31, 2012. The decrease in gross profit margins for the year ended December 31, 2013 was partially due to the negative effects of foreign exchange rates, including the impact of the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar versus the Japanese Yen, as our Yen denominated revenues substantially exceeded our Yen denominated expenses. Changes in the value of the Yen compared to the U.S. Dollar can have a significant positive or negative affect on our gross profit margins and income from operations. In addition, there was a year-over-year decline in the amount of license revenue recognized on the sale of technology in the BEST segment, which had no cost of revenue and further decreased our gross profit margins. Finally, volume and pricing declines in our Bruker MAT Group had a negative impact on our margins. Selling, general and administrative expenses and research and development expenses decreased to $628.4 million, or 34.2% of revenue, in 2013 from $635.7 million, or 35.5% of revenue, in 2012. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses and research and development expenses in 2013 is attributable to lower discretionary spending, including management’s decision to reduce spending in less profitable portions of the Company and lower levels of research and development material consumption. These effects were partially offset by increased general and administrative spending related to certain investments, including financial systems improvements. We recorded an impairment charge in the amount of $23.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, comprising goodwill and definite-lived intangible assets of $1.4 million and $16.4 million, respectively, related to our CAM division, and an impairment charge of $6.0 million for 44 other long-lived assets to reduce the carrying value to their estimated fair value. There was no impairment charge recorded for the year ended December 31, 2013. Other charges, net were $28.6 million in 2013 as compared to $13.9 million in 2012. The increase in other charges, net was primarily due to $18.2 million of restructuring costs recorded in 2013 related to closing facilities and implementing outsourcing and other restructuring initiatives. Of the $18.2 million, $15.9 million is within the BSI segment and $2.3 million is within the BEST segment. This was partially offset by a decrease in legal and other professional service fees associated with our internal investigation and review of our operations in China. Income from operations for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $148.2 million, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%, compared to income from operations of $156.0 million, resulting in an operating margin of 8.7%, for the year ended December 31, 2012. Included in income from operations are various charges for amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets and other acquisition- related costs; impairment of goodwill, intangible assets and other long-term assets; legal and other professional services fees related to our internal investigation and review of our operations in China; and restructuring and relocation costs totaling, in the aggregate, $57.3 million and $63.0 million in 2013 and 2012, respectively. Excluding these charges, operating margins were 11.2% in 2013 and 12.2% in 2012. Adjusting for these items, the decrease in operating margins for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to the prior year is primarily due to the negative effects of foreign exchange rates, including the impact of the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar versus the Japanese Yen, as our Yen denominated revenues substantially exceeded our Yen denominated expenses. This was partially offset by lower selling, general and administrative expenses and research and development expenses as noted above. We are continuing to focus on controlling costs and are reviewing additional selective cost saving programs to further reduce expenses and improve operating margins in 2014. Our effective tax rate for 2013 was 34.3%, compared to 43.5% for 2012. The decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily due to the impairment charges noted above recorded in 2012, for which a tax deduction was not permitted. Our net income attributable to the shareholders of Bruker Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $80.1 million, or $0.48 per diluted share, compared to $77.5 million, or $0.46 per diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase for the year ended December 31, 2013 was primarily due to higher revenue levels, reductions in overall operating expenses and a lower effective tax rate, partially offset by a decline in gross profit margins. CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES This discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires that we make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to revenue recognition, the expensing and capitalization of software development costs, stock-based compensation expense, restructuring and other related charges, income taxes, including the recoverability of deferred tax assets, allowances for doubtful accounts, inventory reductions for excess and obsolete inventories, estimated fair values of long-lived assets used to evaluate the recoverability of long-lived assets, intangible assets and goodwill, expected future cash flows used to evaluate the recoverability of intangible assets and long-lived assets, warranty costs, derivative financial instruments and contingent liabilities. We base our estimates and judgments on our historical experience, current market and economic conditions, industry trends, and other assumptions that we believe are reasonable and form the basis for making judgments 45 about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from these estimates. We believe the following critical accounting policies to be both those most important to the portrayal of our financial position and results of operations and those that require the most subjective judgment. Revenue recognition. We recognize revenue from system sales when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the price is fixed or determinable, title and risk of loss has been transferred to the customer and collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. Title and risk of loss are generally transferred upon customer acceptance for a system that has been delivered to the customer and installed. When products are sold through an independent distributor or a strategic distribution partner who assumes responsibility for installation, we recognize the system sale when the product has been shipped and title and risk of loss have been transferred to the distributor. Our distributors do not have price protection rights or rights of return; however, our products are typically warranted to be free from defect for a period of one year. Revenue is deferred until cash is received when collectability is not reasonably assured or when the price is not fixed or determinable. For arrangements with multiple elements, we allocate revenue to each element either using vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE), third-party evidence (TPE) or estimated selling price (ESP). We attempt to determine the fair value of using VSOE. If VSOE is not available, we use TPE, and when we can’t determine VSOE or TPE we use ESP. Typically, we cannot ascertain TPE. When products and services offered do not qualify as separate units of accounting, we recognize revenue upon customer acceptance for a system that has been shipped, installed, and for which the customer has been trained. As a result, the timing of customer acceptance or readiness could cause reported revenues to differ materially from expectations. Revenue from accessories and parts is recognized upon shipment and service revenue is recognized as the services are performed. We also have contracts for which we apply the percentage-of-completion model and completed contract model of revenue recognition. Application of the percentage-of-completion method requires us to make reasonable estimates of the extent of progress toward completion of the contract and the total costs we will incur under the contract and losses are recorded immediately when we estimate that contracts will ultimately result in a loss. Changes in our estimates could affect the timing of revenue recognition. Income taxes. The determination of income tax expense requires us to make certain estimates and judgments concerning the annual effective tax rate, and the calculation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, the forecasted profitability of our subsidiaries in certain geographic jurisdictions, as well as the deductions, carryforwards and credits that are available to reduce taxable income. Deferred tax assets and liabilities arise from differences in the timing of the recognition of revenue and expenses for financial statement and tax purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the tax rates in effect for the year in which these temporary differences are expected to be settled. We estimate the degree to which tax assets and loss carryforwards will result in a benefit based on expected profitability by tax jurisdiction, and we provide a valuation allowance for tax assets and loss carryforwards that we believe will more likely than not go unused. If it becomes more likely than not that a tax asset or loss carryforward will be used for which a reserve has been provided, we reverse the related valuation allowance. If our actual future taxable income by tax jurisdiction differs from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary. In addition, we only recognize benefits for tax positions that we believe are more likely than not of being sustained upon review by a taxing authority with knowledge of all relevant information. We reevaluate our uncertain tax positions on a quarterly basis and any changes to these positions as a result of tax audits, tax laws or other facts and circumstances could result in additional charges or credits to operations. The expiration of statutes of limitations affecting estimates made for uncertain tax positions can cause higher earnings. 46 Inventories. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with costs determined by the first-in, first-out method for a majority of subsidiaries and by average cost for certain other subsidiaries. We record provisions to account for excess and obsolete inventory to reflect the expected non-saleable or non-refundable inventory based on an evaluation of slow moving products or products no longer offered for sale. Inventories also include demonstration units located in our demonstration laboratories or installed at the sites of potential customers. We consider our demonstration units to be available for sale. We reduce the carrying value of demonstration inventories for differences between cost and estimated net realizable value, taking into consideration usage in the preceding twelve months, expected demand, technological obsolescence and other information including the physical condition of the unit. If ultimate usage or demand varies significantly from expected usage or demand, additional write-downs may be required, resulting in additional charges to operations. Goodwill, other intangible assets and other long-lived assets. We evaluate goodwill for impairment annually and when events occur or circumstances change. We test goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level, which is the operating segment or one level below an operating segment. Under U.S. GAAP, we have the option of performing a qualitative assessment to determine whether further impairment testing is necessary before performing a two-step quantitative assessment. The qualitative assessment requires significant judgments about macro-economic conditions including the entity’s operating environment; its industry and other market considerations; entity-specific events related to financial performance or loss of key personnel; and other events that could impact the reporting unit. If, as a result of our qualitative assessment, it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the quantitative impairment test will be required. Otherwise, no further testing is required. If a quantitative impairment test is performed, the first step involves comparing the fair values of the applicable reporting units with their aggregate carrying values, including goodwill. We generally determine the fair value of our reporting units using a weighting of both the market approach and the income approach methodologies. The income approach valuation methodology includes discounted cash flow estimates. Estimating the fair value of the reporting units requires significant judgment about the future cash flows. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, we perform the second step of the goodwill impairment test to measure the amount of the impairment. In the second step of the goodwill impairment test, we compare the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying value of that goodwill. We also review definite-lived intangible assets and other long-lived assets when indications of potential impairment exist. Should the fair value of our long-lived assets decline because of reduced operating performance, market declines or other indicators of an impairment, a charge to operations for impairment may be necessary. Warranty costs. We normally provide a one year parts and labor warranty with the purchase of equipment. The anticipated cost for this warranty is accrued upon recognition of the sale based on historical warranty rates and our assumptions of future warranty claims. The warranty accrual is included as a current liability on the consolidated balance sheets. Although our products undergo quality assurance and testing procedures throughout the production process, our warranty obligation is caused by product failure rates, material usage, and service delivery costs incurred in correcting a product failure. Although our actual warranty costs have historically been consistent with expectations, to the extent warranty claim activity or costs associated with servicing those claims differ from our estimates, changes to our reserve levels may be required. 47 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Year Ended December 31, 2013 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2012 Consolidated Results The following table presents our results for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 (dollars in millions, except per share data): Year Ended December 31, 2013 2012 Product revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Service revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,611.4 219.3 8.7 $1,556.5 210.0 24.9 Total revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,839.4 1,791.4 Cost of product revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of service revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 891.7 142.5 Total cost of revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,034.2 Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805.2 Operating expenses: Selling, general and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Research and development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Impairment of assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 437.9 190.5 — 28.6 657.0 148.2 837.2 124.8 962.0 829.4 440.4 195.3 23.8 13.9 673.4 156.0 Interest and other income (expense), net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (23.6) (17.7) Income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest in consolidated subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in consolidated subsidiaries . . . Net income attributable to Bruker Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 124.6 42.8 81.8 1.7 80.1 Net income per common share attributable to Bruker Corporation shareholders: Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 0.48 0.48 138.3 60.1 78.2 0.7 77.5 0.47 0.46 $ $ $ Weighted average common shares outstanding: Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166.5 168.5 166.0 167.4 Revenue For the year ended December 31, 2013, our revenue increased by $48.0 million, or 2.7%, to $1,839.4 million, compared to $1,791.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. Included in this change in revenue are decreases of approximately $5.3 million from the impact of foreign exchange due 48 to the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar versus the Japanese Yen, offset by a weakening of the U.S. Dollar versus the Euro, and approximately $3.8 million attributable to recent acquisitions and divestitures. Excluding the effects of foreign exchange and our recent acquisitions and divestitures, revenue increased by $57.1 million, or 3.2%. The increase in revenue on an adjusted basis is attributable to both the BSI segment, which increased by $56.6 million, or 3.4%, and the BEST segment, which increased by $6.5 million, or 4.8%%, offset by intersegment eliminations. Revenue in the BSI segment on an adjusted basis reflects increased sales in the Bruker BioSpin and Bruker CALID Groups, particularly nuclear magnetic resonance products, MALDI Biotyper and FTMS products sold by our LSC division, and improved commercial execution by our Bruker Optics division. These increases were partially offset by reduced sales in the Bruker MAT Group, particularly atomic force microscopy and X-ray products. The mix of products sold in the BSI segment during 2013 reflects significant quarterly variability in demand, both geographically and by end market, for our products. In particular, there was an increase in demand in academic markets, especially in Europe and Asia, offset by decreased demand from customers in industrial and microelectronics markets, particularly in Asia. Revenues in the BEST segment increased due to increased sales of low temperature superconducting wire as well as beamline and cavity device sales, partially offset by an incremental decline of $10.7 million of license revenue recognized on the sale of technology. Cost of Revenue Our cost of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $1,034.2 million, resulting in a gross profit margin of 43.8%, compared to cost of revenue of $962.0 million, resulting in a gross profit margin of 46.3%, for the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase in cost of revenue is primarily a function of the higher revenues described above. Our cost of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 includes charges of $27.3 million and $21.9 million, respectively, representing amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets and other acquisition-related costs and restructuring charges during 2013. Excluding these charges, our gross profit margin for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was 45.3% and 47.5%, respectively. The lower gross profit margin was partially due to the negative effects of foreign exchange rates, including the impact of the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar versus the Japanese Yen, as our Yen denominated revenues substantially exceeded our Yen denominated expenses. Changes in the value of the Yen compared to the U.S. Dollar can have a significant positive or negative effect on our gross profit margins and income from operations. In addition, there was a year-over-year decline in the amount of license revenue recognized on the sale of technology in the BEST segment, which had no cost of revenue and further decreased our gross profit margins. Finally, volume and pricing declines in our Bruker MAT Group had a negative impact on our margins. Selling, General and Administrative Our selling, general and administrative expense for the year ended December 31, 2013 decreased to $437.9 million, or 23.8% of revenue, from $440.4 million, or 24.6% of revenue, for the year ended December 31, 2012. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses is driven by the impact of lower discretionary spending, partially offset by increased general and administrative spending related to certain investments, including financial system improvements, as well as expenses due to recent acquisitions. Research and Development Our research and development expense for the year ended December 31, 2013 decreased to $190.5 million, or 10.4% of revenue, from $195.3 million, or 10.9% of revenue, for the year ended December 31, 2012. The decrease in research and development expenses was attributable to 49 management’s decision to reduce spending in less profitable portions of the Company and lower levels of material costs. Impairment of Assets The Company recorded an impairment of assets of $23.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, comprising goodwill and definite-lived intangible asset impairment charges of $1.4 million and $16.4 million, respectively, relating to our CAM division, and an impairment charge of $6.0 million of other long-lived assets to reduce the carrying value to their estimated fair value. At December 31, 2013, the Company performed its annual goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible impairment evaluation by performing a qualitative assessment and concluded that it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of the reporting units are greater than their carrying amount, and therefore, no impairment is required. At December 31, 2012, the Company performed its annual goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible impairment evaluation by performing a quantitative assessment and concluded all reporting units’ fair values exceeded their carrying values, with the exception of the CAM division, which experienced increased deterioration in its financial performance. The Company, therefore, performed step two of the impairment test to measure potential impairment and concluded an impairment charge of $1.4 million was required and represented all the goodwill allocated to the CAM division. There were no indefinite-lived intangible assets associated with the CAM division and no impairment of indefinite-lived intangible assets during the year ended December 31, 2012. The increased deterioration in financial performance of the CAM division during 2012 discussed above was an indicator requiring the evaluation of the definite-lived intangible assets and other long-term assets within that reporting unit for recoverability. The Company performed a valuation at December 31, 2012 and determined that the definite-lived intangible assets and certain other long-term assets within the CAM division were impaired. The Company recorded an impairment charge in the amount of $21.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 to reduce the carrying value of those assets to their estimated fair values. No impairment losses were recorded related to definite-lived intangible assets during the year ended December 31, 2013. In addition, based on the abandonment of a project in the BEST reporting unit in 2012 there was an indicator requiring the evaluation of those long-lived assets for recoverability. The Company performed a valuation at December 31, 2012, and determined that certain of the other long-lived assets within the BEST reporting unit were impaired. During the year ended December 31, 2012, an impairment charge in the amount of $1.2 million related to property, plant and equipment was recorded to reduce the carrying value of those assets to their estimated fair values. We will continue to monitor goodwill and long-lived intangible assets, as well as long-lived tangible assets, for possible future impairment. Other Charges Other charges, net of $28.6 million recorded in 2013 related primarily to the BSI segment. The charges consist of $18.2 million of restructuring costs, including $15.9 million within the BSI segment and $2.3 million within the BEST segment, related to closing facilities and implementing outsourcing and other restructuring initiatives, $6.1 million of legal and other professional service fees associated with our internal investigation and review of our operations in China, $3.6 million of acquisition-related costs and $0.7 million related to two factory relocations within the BEST segment. Other charges, net of $13.9 million recorded in 2012 consist of $11.1 million of legal and other professional service fees associated with our internal investigation and review of our operations in China, $2.0 million related to two factory relocations within the BEST segment, and $0.8 million of other charges. 50 In 2014, we expect to incur $15-$20 million of expense related to various outsourcing initiatives and other restructuring activities that were implemented in 2013 or will commence in 2014. Interest and Other Income (Expense), Net Interest and other income (expense), net during the year ended December 31, 2013 was $(23.6) million, compared to $(17.7) million for the year ended December 31, 2012. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the major components within interest and other income (expense), net were net interest expense of $12.4 million and realized and unrealized losses on foreign currency transactions of $10.4 million. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the major components within interest and other income (expense), net were net interest expense of $13.4 million and realized and unrealized losses on foreign currency transactions of $6.8 million, partially offset by a $2.2 million gain on the sale of a product line during 2012. The decrease in interest expense is driven by the maturity of an interest rate swap at the end of 2012. The realized and unrealized losses on foreign currency transactions during 2013 were driven by the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar and Euro versus a number of currencies in which we operate. We expect to incur approximately $14 million of interest expense in 2014. Provision for Income Taxes Our income tax provision generally reflects amounts for non-U.S. entities only as we maintain a full valuation allowance against all U.S. deferred tax assets, including our U.S. net operating losses and tax credits, until evidence exists that it is more likely than not that the loss carryforward and credit amounts will be utilized to offset U.S. taxable income. Our tax rate may change over time as the amount and mix of income and taxes outside the U.S. changes. The income tax provision for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $42.8 million compared to an income tax provision of $60.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, representing effective tax rates of 34.3% and 43.5%, respectively. The decrease in the effective tax rate is primarily due to the impairment charges recorded in 2012, for which a tax deduction was not permitted. Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $1.7 million compared to $0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. The net income attributable to noncontrolling interests represents the minority shareholders’ proportionate share of the net income recorded by our majority-owned indirect subsidiaries. Net Income Attributable to Bruker Corporation Our net income attributable to Bruker Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $80.1 million, or $0.48 per diluted share, compared to net income of $77.5 million, or $0.46 per diluted share, for 2012. The increase for the year ended December 31, 2013 was primarily due to higher revenue levels, reductions in overall operating expenses and a lower effective tax rate, partially offset by a decline in gross margins. 51 Segment Results Revenue The following table presents revenue, change in revenue and revenue growth by reportable segment for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 (dollars in millions): BSI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BEST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Eliminations (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,709.5 147.4 (17.5) $1,666.1 136.2 (10.9) $1,839.4 $1,791.4 $43.4 11.2 (6.6) $48.0 2013 2012 Dollar Change Percentage Change 2.6% 8.2% 2.7% (a) Represents product and service revenue between reportable segments. BSI Segment Revenues BSI segment revenue increased by $43.4 million, or 2.6%, to $1,709.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, compared to $1,666.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. Included in this change in revenue is a decrease of approximately $9.4 million from the impact of changes on foreign exchange rates due to the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar versus the Japanese Yen, offset by a weakening of the U.S. Dollar versus the Euro, and a decrease of approximately $3.8 million attributable to our recent acquisitions and divestitures. Excluding the effect of foreign exchange and acquisitions and divestitures, revenue increased by $56.6 million, or 3.4%. The Bruker BioSpin Group experienced an increase in revenue, primarily driven by increased sales of nuclear magnetic resonance products due to strong demand from academic customers, particularly in Europe and Asia. The Bruker CALID Group also experienced an increase in revenue, driven primarily by increases in MALDI Biotyper and FTMS products sold by our LSC division and improved commercial execution by our Bruker Optics division. The Bruker MAT Group experienced a decrease in revenue across most of its divisions driven by declines in atomic force microscopy products and X-ray products. This resulted from lower demand from customers in industrial and microelectronics markets, particularly in Asia. System revenue and aftermarket revenue as a percentage of total BSI segment revenue were as follows during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 (dollars in millions): 2013 Revenue Percentage of Segment Revenue System revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Aftermarket revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,385.1 324.4 Total revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,709.5 81.0% 19.0% 100.0% 2012 Percentage of Segment Revenue 81.3% 18.7% 100.0% Revenue $1,354.2 311.9 $1,666.1 System revenue in the BSI segment includes nuclear magnetic resonance systems, magnetic resonance imaging systems, electron paramagnetic imaging systems, mass spectrometry systems, gas chromatography systems, CBRNE detection systems, X-ray systems, spark-optical emission spectroscopy systems, atomic force microscopy systems, stylus and optical metrology systems, molecular spectroscopy systems and other systems. Aftermarket revenues in the BSI segment include accessory sales, consumables, training and services. 52 BEST Segment Revenues BEST segment revenues increased by $11.2 million, or 8.2%, to $147.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, compared to $136.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. Included in this change in revenue is an increase of approximately $4.7 million from the impact of foreign exchange due to the weakening of the U.S. Dollar versus the Euro and other foreign currencies. Excluding the effect of foreign exchange, revenue increased by $6.5 million, or 4.8%. The increase in revenue, excluding the effect of foreign exchange, is primarily attributable to increased sales of low temperature superconducting wire as well as beamline and cavity devices, partially offset by a $10.7 million reduction in license revenue recognized on the sale of technology. System and wire revenue and aftermarket revenue as a percentage of total BEST segment revenue were as follows during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 (dollars in millions): System and wire revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Aftermarket and other revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Revenue $137.3 10.1 Total revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $147.4 2013 Percentage of Segment Revenue 93.1% 6.9% 100.0% Revenue $111.7 24.5 $136.2 2012 Percentage of Segment Revenue 82.0% 18.0% 100.0% System and wire revenue in the BEST segment includes low and high temperature superconducting wire and superconducting devices, including magnets, linear accelerators and radio frequency cavities. Aftermarket revenues in the BEST segment consist primarily of license revenue and consumables sales. Gross Profit and Operating Expenses For the year ended December 31, 2013, gross profit margin in the BSI segment decreased to 45.3% from 47.4% versus the comparable period in 2012. Lower gross profit margins resulted primarily from the negative effects of foreign exchange rates, including the impact of the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar versus the Japanese Yen, and volume and pricing declines in our Bruker MAT Group. In addition, restructuring charges were recorded during the year ended December 31, 2013 related to closing facilities and implementing outsourcing and other restructuring initiatives. BEST segment gross profit margin decreased to 21.5% from 31.2% for the comparable period in 2012, primarily due a decline in recognition of license revenue on the sale of technology, which had no cost of revenue. For the year ended December 31, 2013, selling, general and administrative expenses and research and development expenses in the BSI segment decreased to $609.1 million, or 35.6% of segment revenue, from $614.0 million, or 36.9% of segment revenue, for the comparable period in 2012. The decrease was driven by the impact of lower discretionary spending, management’s decision to reduce research and development spending in less profitable portions of the business and lower levels of research and development material consumption, partially offset by higher general and administrative spending related to certain investments, including financial system improvements, as well as expenses due to recent acquisitions. Selling, general and administrative expenses and research and development expenses in the BEST segment decreased to $19.3 million, or 13.1% of segment revenue, from $26.2 million, or 19.2% of segment revenue for the comparable period in 2012. The decrease was attributable to lower discretionary spending and the impact of management’s decision to reduce research and development spending in less profitable portions of the business. 53 Income (Loss) from Operations The following table presents income (loss) from operations and operating margins on revenue by reportable segment for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 (dollars in millions): 2013 2012 Operating Income (Loss) Percentage of Segment Revenue Operating Income (Loss) Percentage of Segment Revenue BSI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BEST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Corporate, eliminations and other (a) . . . Total operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . $138.9 9.5 (0.2) $148.2 8.1% 6.4% 8.1% $140.8 12.8 2.4 $156.0 8.5% 9.4% 8.7% (a) Represents corporate costs and eliminations not allocated to the reportable segments. BSI segment income from operations for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $138.9 million, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%, compared to income from operations of $140.8 million, resulting in an operating margin of 8.5%, for the year ended December 31, 2012. Income from operations includes $54.1 million and $59.2 million in the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, included various charges representing amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets and other acquisition-related costs, impairment of goodwill, definite-lived intangible assets and other long-lived assets, and restructuring and relocation costs. Excluding these costs, income from operations in the BSI segment would have been $193.0 million and $200.0 million, resulting in operating margins of 11.3% and 12.0%, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. Income from operations, on an adjusted basis, declined primarily as a result of lower gross margins, due in part to the negative effects of foreign exchange rates, including the impact of the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar versus the Japanese Yen, as our Yen denominated revenues substantially exceeded our Yen denominated expenses. These declines were partially offset by higher revenues described above. The Company recorded restructuring costs within the BSI segment of $23.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, related to closing facilities and implementing outsourcing and other restructuring initiatives. The Company recorded an impairment of assets within the BSI segment of $22.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, comprised of goodwill and definite-lived intangible asset impairment charges of $1.4 million and $16.4 million, respectively, in our CAM division, and an impairment charge of $4.8 million of other long-lived assets to reduce the carrying value to their estimated fair value. BEST segment income from operations for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $9.5 million, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%, compared to income from operations of $12.8 million, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%, for the year ended December 31, 2012. The decline in operating margin was primarily the result of lower levels of license revenue on the sale of technology, which had no cost of revenue, and $2.3 million of restructuring expenses recorded during the year ended December 31, 2013. These factors were partially offset by lower selling, general and administrative expenses and research and development expenses. The Company recorded an impairment of assets within the BEST segment of $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 to reduce the carrying value of certain tangible long-lived assets to their estimated fair value. 54 Year Ended December 31, 2012 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2011 Consolidated Results The following table presents our results for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 (dollars in millions, except per share data): Product revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Service revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of product revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of service revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total cost of revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating expenses: Selling, general and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Research and development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Impairment of assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Write-off of deferred offering costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Year Ended December 31, 2012 2011 $1,556.5 210.0 24.9 1,791.4 837.2 124.8 $1,445.6 194.8 11.3 1,651.7 792.5 106.7 962.0 829.4 440.4 195.3 23.8 — 13.9 673.4 899.2 752.5 406.6 177.2 — 3.4 9.7 596.9 Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest and other income (expense), net 156.0 (17.7) 155.6 (10.1) Income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest in consolidated subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in consolidated subsidiaries . . . Net income attributable to Bruker Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income per common share attributable to Bruker Corporation shareholders: Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Weighted average common shares outstanding: Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138.3 60.1 78.2 0.7 77.5 0.47 0.46 166.0 167.4 $ $ $ 145.5 51.5 94.0 1.7 92.3 0.56 0.55 165.4 166.9 $ $ $ Revenue For the year ended December 31, 2012, our revenue increased by $139.7 million, or 8.5%, to $1,791.4 million, compared to $1,651.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. Included in this change in revenue are a decrease of approximately $76.8 million from the impact of foreign exchange due to the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar versus the Euro and other foreign currencies and an increase of approximately $19.8 million attributable to recent acquisitions. Excluding the effects of foreign exchange and our recent acquisitions, revenue increased by $196.7 million, or 11.9%. The 55 increase in revenue on an adjusted basis is attributable to both the BSI segment, which increased by $158.5 million, or 10.2%, and the BEST segment, which increased by $33.9 million, or 29.9%. Revenue in the BSI segment reflects an increase in sales from many of our core technologies, particularly nuclear magnetic resonance, mass spectrometry and X-ray products. The mix of products sold in the BSI segment during 2012 reflects increased demand from academic, government and industrial customers. We attribute the increase in sales to academic and government customers to increased spending from these customers and to new product introductions. The improvement in revenues from our industrial customers reflects continued growth in these end markets and our new product introductions. Revenues in the BEST segment increased primarily due to recognition of license revenue on the sale of technology. In addition, revenue benefitted from higher demand for low temperature superconducting wire. Cost of Revenue Our cost of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2012, was $962.0 million, resulting in a gross profit margin of 46.3%, compared to cost of revenue of $899.2 million, resulting in a gross profit margin of 45.6%, for the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase in cost of revenue is primarily a function of the higher revenues described above. Our cost of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2012 includes charges of $21.9 million representing amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets and other acquisition-related costs. Our cost of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2011 includes charges of $24.4 million representing inventory allowances for the rework of certain specialty magnets that did not meet customer specifications and amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets and other acquisition-related costs. Excluding these charges, our gross profit margin for the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was 47.5% and 47.0%, respectively. The higher gross profit margin was driven by license revenue from the sale of technology in the BEST segment, which had no cost of revenue, and sales of our newly introduced products which carry higher gross margins than our previous generations of products. Offsetting these items were increasing pricing pressures in certain markets, changes in the mix of products and lower gross profit margins in our CAM division due to increased production costs. Selling, General and Administrative Our selling, general and administrative expense for the year ended December 31, 2012 increased to $440.4 million, or 24.6% of revenue, from $406.6 million, or 24.6% of revenue, for the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses in dollars is driven by increases in headcount from our recent acquisitions and increases in headcount to support planned revenue growth in our existing businesses. Research and Development Our research and development expense for the year ended December 31, 2012 increased to $195.3 million, or 10.9% of revenue, from $177.2 million, or 10.7% of revenue, for the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase in research and development expenses is attributable to increases in headcount from recent acquisitions and increases in headcount and material costs to support future product introductions in our existing businesses. Impairment of Assets The Company recorded an impairment of assets of $23.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, comprising goodwill and definite-lived intangible asset impairment charges of $1.4 million and $16.4 million, respectively, relating to our CAM division, and an impairment charge of $6.0 million of other long-lived assets to reduce the carrying value to their estimated fair value. 56 At December 31, 2012, the Company performed its annual goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible impairment evaluation by performing a quantitative assessment and concluded all reporting units’ fair values exceeded their carrying values, with the exception of the CAM division, which experienced increased deterioration in its financial performance. The Company, therefore, performed step two of the impairment test to measure potential impairment and concluded an impairment charge of $1.4 million was required and represented all the goodwill allocated to the CAM division. There were no indefinite-lived intangible assets associated with the CAM division and no impairment of indefinite- lived intangible assets during the year ended December 31, 2012. The increased deterioration in financial performance of the CAM division during 2012 discussed above was an indicator requiring the evaluation of the definite-lived intangible assets and other long-term assets within that reporting unit for recoverability. The Company performed a valuation at December 31, 2012 and determined that the definite-lived intangible assets and certain other long-term assets within the CAM division were impaired. The Company recorded an impairment charge in the amount of $21.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 to reduce the carrying value of those assets to their estimated fair values. No impairment losses were recorded related to definite-lived intangible assets during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2011. In addition, based on the abandonment of a project in the BEST reporting unit in 2012 there was an indicator requiring the evaluation of those long-lived assets for recoverability. The Company performed a valuation at December 31, 2012, and determined that certain of the other long-lived assets within the BEST reporting unit were impaired. During the year ended December 31, 2012, an impairment charge in the amount of $1.2 million related to property, plant and equipment was recorded to reduce the carrying value of those assets to their estimated fair values. Write-off of Deferred Offering Costs In September 2010, we announced plans to sell a minority ownership position in our BEST subsidiary through an initial public offering of the capital stock of BEST. As a result of economic and market factors, the timing of the BEST initial public offering was uncertain and deferred offering costs totaling $3.4 million were expensed in the third quarter of 2011. In March 2012, we determined not to proceed with the initial public offering of the capital stock of BEST. Other Charges Other charges, net of $13.9 million recorded in 2012 consist of $11.1 million of legal and other professional service fees associated with our internal investigation and review of our operations in China, $2.0 million related to two factory relocations that are occurring within the BEST segment, and $0.8 million of other charges. Other charges, net of $9.7 million recorded in 2011 consist of charges recorded entirely in the BSI segment. The charges recorded in 2011 consist of $4.2 million of acquisition-related costs associated with the nano surfaces business, chemical analysis business and other acquisitions completed during the year. Acquisition-related costs consist of costs incurred under transition service arrangements we entered into with the sellers of the nano surfaces and chemical analysis businesses and transaction costs, including legal, accounting and other fees. Other charges, net for the year ended December 31, 2011 also includes $4.3 million of legal and other professional service fees associated with our internal investigation and review of our operations in China and $1.2 million of other charges. Interest and Other Income (Expense), Net Interest and other income (expense), net during the year ended December 31, 2012 was $(17.7) million, compared to $(10.1) million for the year ended December 31, 2011. 57 During the year ended December 31, 2012, the major components within interest and other income (expense), net were net interest expense of $13.4 million and realized and unrealized losses on foreign currency transactions of $6.8 million, partially offset by a $2.2 million gain on the sale of a product line during 2012. During the year ended December 31, 2011, the major components within interest and other income (expense), net, consisted of net interest expense of $6.3 million and realized and unrealized losses on foreign currency transactions of $4.4 million. The increase in interest expense is primarily a function of higher average outstanding debt balances throughout 2012 and an increase in the average interest rates we pay on outstanding borrowings due to entering into a longer-term debt arrangement in 2012 with higher interest rates. The realized and unrealized losses on foreign currency transactions during 2012 were primarily a function of changes in exchange rates between the Euro and the Swiss Franc against the U.S. Dollar. Provision for Income Taxes Our income tax provision generally reflects amounts for non-U.S. entities only. We maintain a full valuation allowance against all U.S. deferred tax assets, including our U.S. net operating losses and tax credits, until evidence exists that it is more likely than not that the loss carryforward and credit amounts will be utilized to offset U.S. taxable income. Our tax rate may change over time as the amount and mix of income and taxes outside the U.S. changes. The income tax provision for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $60.1 million compared to an income tax provision of $51.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, representing effective tax rates of 43.5% and 35.4%, respectively. The increase in the effective tax rate was primarily due to the impairment charges, for which a tax deduction was not permitted. Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $0.7 million compared to $1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The net income attributable to noncontrolling interests represents the minority shareholders’ proportionate share of the net income recorded by our majority-owned indirect subsidiaries. Net Income Attributable to Bruker Corporation Our net income attributable to Bruker Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $77.5 million, or $0.46 per diluted share, compared to net income of $92.3 million, or $0.55 per diluted share, for 2011. The decrease for the year ended December 31, 2012 was due to increases in operating expenses, including impairment of goodwill, intangibles, and other long-lived assets, higher spending on non-recurring items and higher net interest expense. These were partially offset by revenue growth and higher gross margins. 58 Segment Results Revenue The following table presents revenue, change in revenue and revenue growth by reportable segment for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 (dollars in millions): BSI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BEST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Eliminations (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,666.1 136.2 (10.9) $1,554.1 113.4 (15.8) $1,791.4 $1,651.7 $112.0 22.8 4.9 $139.7 2012 2011 Dollar Change Percentage Change 7.2% 20.1% 8.5% (a) Represents product and service revenue between reportable segments. BSI Segment Revenues BSI segment revenue increased by $112.0 million, or 7.2%, to $1,666.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to $1,554.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. Included in this change in revenue is a decrease of approximately $66.3 million from the impact of foreign exchange due to the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar versus the Euro and other foreign currencies and an increase of approximately $19.8 million attributable to our recent acquisitions. Excluding the effect of foreign exchange and acquisitions, revenue increased by $158.5 million, or 10.2%. The increase in revenue, excluding the effect of foreign exchange and acquisitions, reflects an increase in sales from many of our core technologies, particularly nuclear magnetic resonance, mass spectrometry and X-ray products. System revenue and aftermarket revenue as a percentage of total BSI segment revenue were as follows during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 (dollars in millions): 2012 2011 Percentage of Segment Revenue Revenue Percentage of Segment Revenue Revenue System revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Aftermarket revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,354.2 311.9 81.3% $1,238.9 315.2 18.7% 79.7% 20.3% Total revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,666.1 100.0% $1,554.1 100.0% System revenue in the BSI segment includes nuclear magnetic resonance systems, magnetic resonance imaging systems, electron paramagnetic imaging systems, mass spectrometry systems, gas chromatography systems, CBRNE detection systems, X-ray systems, spark-optical emission spectroscopy systems, atomic force microscopy systems, stylus and optical metrology systems, molecular spectroscopy systems and other systems. Aftermarket revenues in the BSI segment include accessory sales, consumables, training and services. BEST Segment Revenues BEST segment revenues increased by $22.8 million, or 20.1%, to $136.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to $113.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. Included in this change in revenue is a reduction of approximately $11.1 million from the impact of foreign exchange due to the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar versus the Euro and other foreign currencies. Excluding the effect of foreign exchange, revenue increased by $33.9 million, or 29.9%. The increase in 59 revenue, excluding the effect of foreign exchange, is primarily attributable to license revenue from the sale of technology, as well as higher demand for low temperature superconducting wire. System and wire revenue and aftermarket revenue as a percentage of total BEST segment revenue were as follows during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 (dollars in millions): System and wire revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Aftermarket and other revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2012 Percentage of Segment Revenue 2011 Percentage of Segment Revenue Revenue 82.0% $105.3 8.1 18.0% 92.9% 7.1% Revenue $111.7 24.5 Total revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $136.2 100.0% $113.4 100.0% System and wire revenue in the BEST Technologies segment includes low and high temperature superconducting wire and superconducting devices, including magnets, linear accelerators and radio frequency cavities. Aftermarket revenues in the BEST segment consist primarily of license revenue and consumable sales. Gross Profit and Operating Expenses For the year ended December 31, 2012, gross profit margin in the BSI segment increased to 47.4% from 47.2% for the comparable period in 2011. Excluding the effects of certain non-recurring inventory charges, amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets and other acquisition-related costs and restructuring charges totaling, in the aggregate, $21.7 million and $24.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, gross profit margins were 48.7% for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. The consistency in gross profit margins was driven by sales of our newly introduced products which carry higher gross margins than our previous generations of products. Offsetting this increase were increasing pricing pressures in certain markets, changes in the mix of products and our CAM division contributing lower gross profit margins due to increased production costs. BEST segment gross profit margin increased to 31.2% from 19.8% for the comparable period in 2011, primarily due to the recognition of license revenue on the sale of technology in 2012, which had no cost of revenue. For the year ended December 31, 2012, selling, general and administrative expenses and research and development expenses in the BSI segment increased to $614.0 million, or 36.9% of segment revenue, from $560.8 million, or 36.1% of segment revenue, for the comparable period in 2011. This increase is a function of incremental investments in sales and marketing activities and research and development activities, as well as increases in operating expenses related to the acquisitions completed in 2011 and 2012. These cost increases primarily relate to additional headcount, higher sales commission expenses as a result of higher revenues and higher material costs. Selling, general and administrative expenses and research and development expenses in the BEST segment increased to $26.2 million, or 19.2% of segment revenue, from $23.1 million, or 20.4% of segment revenue for the comparable period in 2011. The decline as a percentage of revenue was attributable to the impact of recognizing license revenue in 2012 related to the sale of technology. 60 Income (Loss) from Operations The following table presents income (loss) from operations and operating margins on revenue by reportable segment for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 (dollars in millions): 2012 2011 Operating Income (Loss) Percentage of Segment Revenue Operating Income (Loss) Percentage of Segment Revenue BSI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BEST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Corporate, eliminations and other (a) . . . . . . . . Total operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $140.8 12.8 2.4 $156.0 8.5% 9.4% 8.7% $162.8 (4.1) (3.1) $155.6 10.5% (3.6)% 9.4% (a) Represents corporate costs and eliminations not allocated to the reportable segments. BSI segment income from operations for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $140.8 million, resulting in an operating margin of 8.5%, compared to income from operations of $162.8 million, resulting in an operating margin of 10.5%, for the year ended December 31, 2011. Income from operations includes $59.2 million and $37.5 million in the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, representing inventory charges, amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets and other acquisition-related costs, impairment of goodwill, definite-lived intangible assets and other long-lived assets and other charges. Excluding these costs, income from operations in the BSI segment would have been $200.0 million and $200.3 million, resulting in operating margins of 12.0% and 12.9%, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. Operating margins declined as a result of the increased pricing pressure in certain markets, product mix and higher operating expenses offset, in part, by higher revenues. The Company recorded an impairment of assets within the BSI segment of $22.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, comprised of goodwill and definite-lived intangible asset impairment charges of $1.4 million and $16.4 million, respectively, in our CAM division, and an impairment charge of $4.8 million of other long-lived assets to reduce the carrying value to their estimated fair value. BEST segment income from operations for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $12.8 million, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%, compared to a loss from operations of $4.1 million, resulting in an operating margin of (3.6)%, for the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase in operating margin is the result of higher revenues, in particular the recognition of license revenue from the sale of technology, partially offset by higher operating expenses. The increase in operating expenses is a function of incremental investments in sales and marketing activities and research and development activities, as well as an impairment of assets of $1.2 million recorded for the year ended December 31, 2012 to reduce the carrying value of certain tangible long-lived assets to their estimated fair value. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES We currently anticipate that our existing cash and credit facilities will be sufficient to support our operating and investing needs for at least the next twelve months. Our future cash requirements could be affected by acquisitions that we may make in the future. Historically, we have financed our growth through cash flow generation and a combination of debt financings and issuances of common stock. In the future, there are no assurances that additional financing alternatives will be available to us, if required, or if available, will be obtained on terms favorable to us. 61 During the year ended December 31, 2013, net cash provided by operating activities was $145.0 million, resulting primarily from $191.0 million of consolidated net income adjusted for non-cash items, partially offset by a $46.0 million increase in working capital. The increase in working capital for the year ended December 31, 2013 is primarily the result of a reduction in income tax payables, in part due to settlement of certain tax audits during 2013, and an increase in accounts receivable from our higher revenue levels. During the year ended December 31, 2012, net cash provided by operating activities was $133.1 million, resulting primarily from $191.4 million of consolidated net income adjusted for non-cash items, partially offset by a $58.3 million increase in working capital driven by higher inventory levels. We recorded an impairment of assets of $23.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, comprising goodwill and definite-lived intangible asset impairment charges of $1.4 million and $16.4 million, respectively, in our CAM division, and an impairment charge of $6.0 million of other long-lived assets to reduce the carrying value to their estimated fair value. The increase in working capital for the year ended December 31, 2012 is primarily the result of an increase in inventory build. During the year ended December 31, 2013, net cash used in investing activities was $60.0 million, compared to net cash used in investing activities of $93.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2012. Cash used in investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2013 was attributable primarily to $48.9 million of capital expenditures, net and $11.6 million used for acquisitions. Cash used in investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2012 was attributable primarily to $69.5 million of capital expenditures, net and $27.0 million used for acquisitions. We currently anticipate that our capital spending will be below $50 million in 2014. During the year ended December 31, 2013, net cash provided by financing activities was $26.5 million, compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $34.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2012. Cash provided by financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2013 was primarily attributable to proceeds of revolving lines of credit of $19.5 million and $8.2 million of proceeds from the issuance of common stock in connection with stock option exercises, offset, in part, by repayment of debt of $1.6 million. Cash provided by financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2012 was primarily attributable to $240.0 million of borrowings under the Note Purchase Agreement described below, offset, in part, by repayments of revolving lines of credit of $216.5 million, proceeds of revolving lines of credit of $93.0 million and net debt repayments under various long-term and short-term arrangements of $83.2 million. At December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had $419.8 million and $288.2 million, respectively, of foreign cash and cash equivalents, most significantly in Germany, Switzerland and the Netherlands, compared to a total amount of cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 of $438.7 million and $310.6 million, respectively. If the cash and cash equivalents held by our foreign subsidiaries are needed to fund operations in the U.S., or we otherwise elect to repatriate the unremitted earnings of our foreign subsidiaries in the form of dividends or otherwise, or if the shares of the subsidiaries were sold or transferred, we would likely be subject to additional U.S. income taxes, net of the impact of any available tax credits, which could result in a higher effective tax rate in the future. Further, based on our current plans and anticipated cash needs to fund our U.S. operations, we do not foresee a need to repatriate earnings of our foreign subsidiaries and it is our current intent to indefinitely reinvest unremitted earnings in our foreign subsidiaries. At December 31, 2013, we had outstanding debt totaling $355.0 million, consisting of $240.0 million outstanding under the Note Purchase Agreement described below, $112.5 million outstanding under the revolving loan component of the Amended Credit Agreement described below and $2.5 million under capital lease obligations and other loans. At December 31, 2012, we had outstanding debt totaling $337.2 million, consisting of $240.0 million outstanding under the Note Purchase Agreement described below, $93.0 million outstanding under the revolving loan component of 62 the Amended Credit Agreement described below and $4.2 million under capital lease obligations and other loans. In May 2011, we entered into an amendment and restatement of a credit agreement originally entered into in 2008, referred to as the Amended Credit Agreement. The Amended Credit Agreement provides for a revolving credit line with a maximum commitment of $250.0 million and maturity date of May 2016. Borrowings under the revolving credit line of the Amended Credit Agreement accrue interest, at our option, at either (a) the greatest of (i) the prime rate, (ii) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% and (iii) adjusted LIBOR plus 1.00% or (b) LIBOR, plus margins ranging from 0.80% to 1.65%. There is also a facility fee ranging from 0.20% to 0.35%. Borrowings under the Amended Credit Agreement are secured by guarantees from certain material subsidiaries, as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement, and Bruker Energy & Supercon Technologies, Inc. The Amended Credit Agreement also requires that we maintain certain financial ratios related to maximum leverage and minimum interest coverage, as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement. Specifically, our leverage ratio cannot exceed 3.0 and our interest coverage ratio cannot be less than 3.0. As of December 31, 2013, we were in compliance with the covenants of the Amended Credit Agreement. In addition to the financial ratios, the Amended Credit Agreement restricts, among other things, our ability to do the following: make certain payments; incur additional debt; incur certain liens; make certain investments, including derivative agreements; merge, consolidate, sell or transfer all or substantially all of our assets; and enter into certain transactions with affiliates. Our failure to comply with any of these restrictions or covenants may result in an event of default on the Amended Credit Agreement, which could permit acceleration of the debt under and require us to prepay the debt before its scheduled due date. Other revolving loans are with various financial institutions located primarily in Germany, Switzerland and France. The following is a summary of the maximum commitments and net amounts available to the Company under revolving loans as of December 31, 2013 (dollars in millions): Weighted Average Interest Rate Total Amount Committed by Outstanding Borrowings Lenders Outstanding Letters of Credit Total Amount Available Amended Credit Agreement . . . . . . . Other revolving loans . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.3% — Total revolving loans . . . . . . . . . . . $250.0 214.4 $464.4 $112.5 — $112.5 0.6 $ 170.6 $171.2 $136.9 43.8 $180.7 In January 2012, we entered into a note purchase agreement, referred to as the Note Purchase Agreement, with a group of accredited institutional investors. Under the Note Purchase Agreement we issued and sold $240.0 million of senior notes, which consist of the following: (cid:127) $20.0 million 3.16% Series 2012A senior notes due January 18, 2017; (cid:127) $15.0 million 3.74% Series 2012A senior notes due January 18, 2019; (cid:127) $105.0 million 4.31% Series 2012A senior notes due January 18, 2022; and (cid:127) $100.0 million 4.46% Series 2012A senior notes due January 18, 2024. As of December 31, 2013, we were in compliance with the covenants of the Note Purchase Agreement. Our leverage ratio was 1.3 and our interest coverage ratio was 13.5. As of December 31, 2013, we have approximately $30.3 million of U.S. net operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future state taxable income, which expire at various times through 2033, and approximately $54.3 million of German Trade Tax net operating losses that are carried forward indefinitely. Additionally, we have $8.6 million of other foreign net operating losses that are expected to expire at various times beginning in 2022. We also have U.S. tax credits of approximately 63 $18.8 million available to offset future tax liabilities that expire at various dates. These credits include research and development tax credits of $11.6 million expiring at various times through 2033 and foreign tax credits of $7.2 million expiring at various times through 2023. These U.S. operating loss and tax credit carryforwards may be subject to limitations under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. The following table summarizes maturities for our significant financial obligations as of December 31, 2013 (dollars in millions): Contractual Obligations Revolving lines of credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other long-term debt, including current portion . . . . Interest payable on long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating lease obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pension liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Uncertain tax contingencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total $112.5 242.5 87.9 87.7 56.5 32.7 $619.8 Less than 1 Year 1-3 Years 4-5 Years More than 5 Years $ — 0.7 10.2 20.7 3.8 — $35.4 $112.5 1.4 20.4 30.2 8.6 32.7 $205.8 $ — 20.2 19.7 19.1 10.1 — $69.1 $ — 220.2 37.6 17.7 34.0 — $309.5 Uncertain tax contingencies are positions taken or expected to be taken on an income tax return that may result in additional payments to tax authorities. The total amount of uncertain tax contingencies is included in the ‘‘1-3 Years’’ column as we are not able to reasonably estimate the timing of potential future payments. If a tax authority agrees with the tax position taken or expected to be taken or the applicable statute of limitations expires, then additional payments will not be necessary. TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES We lease certain office space from certain of our principal shareholders, including a director and executive officer and another member of our Board of Directors, and members of their immediate family. During each of the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, these shareholders were paid approximately $2.6 million, $2.4 million and $2.4 million, respectively, which was estimated to be equal to the fair market value of the rentals. During the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, we incurred expenses of $5.3 million, $2.4 million and $3.2 million, respectively, to a law firm in which one of the members of our Board of Directors is a partner. During the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, we incurred expenses of $0.2 million, $0.4 million and $0.5 million, respectively, to a financial services firm in which one of the members of our Board of Directors is a partner. ITEM 7A QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK We are potentially exposed to market risks associated with changes in foreign exchange rates, interest rates and commodity prices. We selectively use financial instruments to reduce these risks. All transactions related to risk management techniques are authorized and executed pursuant to our policies and procedures. Analytical techniques used to manage and monitor foreign exchange and interest rate risk include market valuations and sensitivity analysis. Impact of Foreign Currencies We generate a substantial portion of our revenues in international markets, principally Germany and other countries in the European Union, Switzerland, and Japan, which exposes our operations to the risk of exchange rate fluctuations. The impact of currency exchange rate movement can be positive or negative in any period. Our costs related to sales in foreign currencies are largely denominated in 64 the same respective currencies, limiting our transaction risk exposure. However, for foreign currency denominated sales in certain regions, such as Japan, where we do not incur significant costs denominated in that foreign currency, we are more exposed to the impact of foreign currency fluctuations. For sales not denominated in U.S. Dollars, if there is an increase in the rate at which a foreign currency is exchanged for U.S. Dollars, it will require more of the foreign currency to equal a specified amount of U.S. Dollars than before the rate increase. In such cases, if we price our products in the foreign currency, we will receive less in U.S. Dollars than we did before the rate increase went into effect. If we price our products in U.S. Dollars and competitors price their products in local currency, an increase in the relative strength of the U.S. Dollar could result in our prices not being competitive in a market where business is transacted in the local currency. In the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 our revenue by geography was as follows (dollars in millions): United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Asia Pacific . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rest of world . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2013 2012 Percentage of Revenue Revenue Percentage of Revenue 19.5% $ 377.2 706.1 42.0% 525.7 28.8% 182.4 9.7% 21.1% 39.4% 29.3% 10.2% Revenue $ 359.7 772.6 529.1 178.0 Total revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,839.4 100.0% $1,791.4 100.0% Changes in foreign currency exchange rates decreased our revenue by approximately 0.3% in the year ended December 31, 2013 and decreased revenue by 4.7% in the year ended December 31, 2012. Assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries, where the functional currency is the local currency, are translated into U.S. dollars using year-end exchange rates, or historical rates, as appropriate. Revenues and expenses of foreign subsidiaries are translated at the average exchange rates in effect during the year. Adjustments resulting from financial statement translations are included as a separate component of shareholders’ equity. In the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, we recorded net gains from currency translation adjustments of $27.3 million and $8.8 million, respectively. Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are reported in interest and other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. Our foreign exchange losses, net were $10.4 million and $6.8 million for years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. From time to time, we have entered into foreign currency contracts in order to minimize the volatility that fluctuations in exchange rates have on our cash flows related to purchases and sales denominated in foreign currencies. Under these arrangements, we agree to purchase a fixed amount of a foreign currency in exchange for a fixed amount of U.S. Dollars or other currencies on specified dates, typically with maturities of less than twelve months. These transactions do not qualify for hedge accounting and, accordingly, the instrument is recorded at fair value with the corresponding gains and losses recorded in interest and other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. 65 At December 31, 2013 and 2012, we had foreign currency contracts with notional amounts aggregating $95.9 million and $94.3 million, respectively. At December 31, 2013, the Company had the following notional amounts outstanding under foreign currency contracts (in millions): Buy December 31, 2013: Euro . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Swiss Francs . . . . . . . . . Notional Amount in Buy Currency Sell Maturity Notional Amount in U.S. Fair Value of Fair Value of Dollars Assets Liabilities 40.4 37.9 U.S. Dollars January 2014 to 54.5 U.S. Dollars March 2014 January 2014 41.4 $95.9 1.1 1.2 $2.3 — — $— Based on the contractual maturities of these contracts and exchange rates as of December 31, 2013, we anticipate that these contracts will result in net cash flows of $2.3 million in 2014. At December 31, 2013, assuming all other variables are constant, if the U.S. Dollar weakened by 10%, the market value of our foreign currency contracts would increase by approximately $9.8 million and if the U.S. Dollar strengthened by 10%, the market value of our foreign currency contracts would decrease by approximately $9.8 million. We will continue to evaluate our currency risks and in the future may utilize foreign currency contracts more frequently as part of a transactional hedging program. Impact of Interest Rates We regularly invest excess cash in short-term investments that are subject to changes in interest rates. We believe that the market risk arising from holding these financial instruments is minimal because of our policy of investing in short-term financial instruments issued by highly rated financial institutions. Our exposure related to adverse movements in interest rates is derived primarily from outstanding floating rate debt instruments that are indexed to short-term market rates. We currently have a higher level of fixed rate debt than variable rate debt, which limits our exposure to adverse movements in interest rates. Impact of Commodity Prices We are exposed to certain commodity risks associated with prices for various raw materials. The prices of copper and certain other raw materials, particularly niobium, used to manufacture superconductors have increased significantly over the last decade. Copper and niobium tin are the main components of low temperature superconductors and continued commodity price increases for copper and niobium, as well as other raw materials, may negatively affect our profitability. Periodically, we enter into commodity forward purchase contracts to minimize the volatility that fluctuations in the price of copper have on our sales of these products. At December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had fixed price commodity contracts with notional amounts aggregating $3.4 million. The fair value of the fixed price commodity contracts at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was $0.1 million and $(0.2) million, respectively. We will continue to evaluate our commodity risks and may utilize commodity forward purchase contracts more frequently in the future. Inflation We do not believe inflation had a material impact on our business or operating results during any of the periods presented. 66 ITEM 8 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 68 69 Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 . Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 74 75 67 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Bruker Corporation We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Bruker Corporation as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, and statements of shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Bruker Corporation at December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Bruker Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework) and our report dated February 27, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. /s/ Ernst & Young LLP Boston, Massachusetts February 27, 2014 68 BRUKER CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (In millions, except share and per share data) December 31, 2013 2012 Current assets: ASSETS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash and cash equivalents Accounts receivable, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 438.7 307.6 589.8 9.7 86.1 $ 310.6 289.3 611.5 5.8 92.5 Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,431.9 1,309.7 Property, plant and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intangible assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other long-term assets 299.5 127.4 105.6 18.7 5.2 283.6 115.9 117.0 17.6 12.6 Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,988.3 $1,856.4 Current liabilities: LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY Current portion of long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Customer advances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term deferred revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued pension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Commitments and contingencies (Note 14) Shareholders’ equity: Preferred stock, $0.01 par value 5,000,000 shares authorized, none issued or outstanding at December 31, 2013 and 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Common stock, $0.01 par value 260,000,000 shares authorized, 167,619,039 and 166,625,976 shares issued and 167,579,204 and 166,604,427 outstanding at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Treasury stock at cost, 39,835 and 21,549 shares at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Additional paid-in capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accumulated other comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total shareholders’ equity attributable to Bruker Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Noncontrolling interest in consolidated subsidiaries Total shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.7 74.8 258.6 16.7 297.8 648.6 354.3 33.7 22.6 40.5 38.4 $ 1.3 69.6 267.3 6.9 336.7 681.8 335.9 34.9 12.1 60.0 22.0 — 1.7 (0.6) 63.5 599.1 182.4 846.1 4.1 850.2 — 1.7 (0.2) 48.3 519.0 137.8 706.6 3.1 709.7 Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,988.3 $1,856.4 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 69 BRUKER CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (In millions, except per share data) Year Ended December 31, 2013 2012 2011 Product revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Service revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,611.4 219.3 8.7 $1,556.5 210.0 24.9 $1,445.6 194.8 11.3 Total revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,839.4 1,791.4 1,651.7 Cost of product revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of service revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 891.7 142.5 Total cost of revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,034.2 Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805.2 Operating expenses: Selling, general and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Research and development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Impairment of assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Write-off of deferred offering costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other charges, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 437.9 190.5 — — 28.6 657.0 148.2 837.2 124.8 962.0 829.4 440.4 195.3 23.8 — 13.9 673.4 156.0 792.5 106.7 899.2 752.5 406.6 177.2 — 3.4 9.7 596.9 155.6 Interest and other income (expense), net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (23.6) (17.7) (10.1) Income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest in consolidated subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in consolidated subsidiaries . . . Net income attributable to Bruker Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Net income per common share attributable to Bruker Corporation shareholders: Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Weighted average common shares outstanding: Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign currency translation adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Changes in hedging instruments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pension liability adjustments (net of tax of $4.6 million, $3.7 million and $0.6 million, respectively) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests . . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 124.6 42.8 81.8 1.7 80.1 0.48 0.48 166.5 168.5 81.8 27.3 — 17.3 126.4 1.7 Comprehensive income attributable to Bruker Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 124.7 $ 138.3 60.1 78.2 0.7 77.5 0.47 0.46 166.0 167.4 78.2 8.8 1.1 (15.0) 73.1 0.3 72.8 145.5 51.5 94.0 1.7 92.3 0.56 0.55 165.4 166.9 94.0 (14.7) 1.9 2.9 84.1 1.7 82.4 $ $ $ $ $ The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 70 l a t o T ’ s r e d l o h e r a h S y t i u q E g n i l l o r t n o c n o N n i s t s e r e t n I d e t a d i l o s n o C s e i r a i d i s b u S l a t o T ’ s r e d l o h e r a h S y t i u q E o t e l b a t u b i r t t A r e k u r B n o i t a r o p r o C d e t a l u m u c c A r e h t O e v i s n e h e r p m o C e m o c n I l a n o i t i d d A y r u s a e r T d e n i a t e R s g n i n r a E n I - d i a P l a t i p a C k c o t S t n u o m A y r u s a e r T s e r a h S n o m m o C k c o t S t n u o m A n o m m o C s e r a h S N O I T A R O P R O C R E K U R B Y T I U Q E ’ S R E D L O H E R A H S F O S T N E M E T A T S D E T A D I L O S N O C ) a t a d e r a h s t p e c x e , s n o i l l i m n I ( 4 . 7 2 5 $ 7 . 2 $ 7 . 4 2 5 $ 4 . 2 5 1 $ 2 . 9 4 3 $ 7 . 1 2 $ ) 2 . 0 ( $ 9 1 2 , 7 1 6 . 1 $ 7 0 2 , 9 2 2 , 5 6 1 9 . 2 — 4 . 3 9 . 7 2 . 0 — ) 0 . 1 ( 0 . 4 9 ) 9 . 9 ( — — — — — — ) 0 . 1 ( 7 . 1 — 9 . 2 — 4 . 3 9 . 7 2 . 0 — — ) 9 . 9 ( 3 . 2 9 — — — — — — — — ) 9 . 9 ( — — — — — — — — 3 . 2 9 9 . 2 — 3 . 3 9 . 7 2 . 0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 6 4 0 , 3 — — 1 . 0 — — — — — — 2 6 3 , 4 3 1 3 2 8 , 6 5 1 9 5 5 , 4 5 3 — — ) 6 4 0 , 3 ( — — — 9 . 4 2 6 $ 4 . 3 $ 5 . 1 2 6 $ 5 . 2 4 1 $ 5 . 1 4 4 $ 0 . 6 3 $ ) 2 . 0 ( $ 5 6 2 , 0 2 7 . 1 $ 5 0 9 , 1 7 8 , 5 6 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 1 0 2 , 1 3 r e b m e c e D t a e c n a l a B s n o i t i s i u q c a h t i w n o i t c e n n o c n i d e u s s i s e r a h S s n o i t i s i u q c a h t i w n o i t c e n n o c n i d e u s s i s e r a h s d e t c i r t s e R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . d e s i c r e x e s n o i t p o k c o t S n o i t a s n e p m o c d e s a b k c o t S s d r a w a k c o t s f o e s i c r e x e o t d e t a l e r t i f e n e b x a t s s e c x E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . d e r i u q c a k c o t s y r u s a e r T s t s e r e t n i g n i l l o r t n o c n o n o t s n o i t u b i r t s i D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . e m o c n i t e n d e t a d i l o s n o C s s o l e v i s n e h e r p m o c r e h t O 1 1 0 2 , 1 3 r e b m e c e D t a e c n a l a B 71 . s t n e m e t a t s l a i c n a n i f e s e h t f o t r a p l a r g e t n i n a e r a s e t o n g n i y n a p m o c c a e h T l a t o T ’ s r e d l o h e r a h S y t i u q E g n i l l o r t n o c n o N n i s t s e r e t n I d e t a d i l o s n o C s e i r a i d i s b u S l a t o T ’ s r e d l o h e r a h S y t i u q E o t e l b a t u b i r t t A r e k u r B n o i t a r o p r o C d e t a l u m u c c A r e h t O e v i s n e h e r p m o C e m o c n I d e n i a t e R s g n i n r a E l a n o i t i d d A n I - d i a P l a t i p a C y r u s a e r T k c o t S t n u o m A y r u s a e r T s e r a h S n o m m o C k c o t S t n u o m A n o m m o C s e r a h S N O I T A R O P R O C R E K U R B ) d e u n i t n o C ( Y T I U Q E ’ S R E D L O H E R A H S F O S T N E M E T A T S D E T A D I L O S N O C ) a t a d e r a h s t p e c x e , s n o i l l i m n I ( . s t n e m e t a t s l a i c n a n i f e s e h t f o t r a p l a r g e t n i n a e r a s e t o n g n i y n a p m o c c a e h T 9 . 4 2 6 $ 4 . 3 $ 5 . 1 2 6 $ 5 . 2 4 1 $ 5 . 1 4 4 $ 0 . 6 3 $ ) 2 . 0 ( $ 5 6 2 , 0 2 7 . 1 $ 5 0 9 , 1 7 8 , 5 6 1 — 5 . 4 8 . 7 — ) 6 . 0 ( 2 . 8 7 ) 1 . 5 ( 7 . 9 0 7 $ — — — — ) 6 . 0 ( 7 . 0 ) 4 . 0 ( 1 . 3 $ — 5 . 4 8 . 7 — — ) 7 . 4 ( 5 . 7 7 — — — — — — ) 7 . 4 ( — — — — — 5 . 7 7 — — 5 . 4 8 . 7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4 8 2 , 1 — — — — — — — — — — — ) 4 8 2 , 1 ( 8 2 0 , 8 8 1 8 7 7 , 5 4 5 — — — 6 . 6 0 7 $ 8 . 7 3 1 $ 0 . 9 1 5 $ 3 . 8 4 $ ) 2 . 0 ( $ 9 4 5 , 1 2 7 . 1 $ 7 2 4 , 4 0 6 , 6 6 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1 0 2 , 1 3 r e b m e c e D t a e c n a l a B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . d e u s s i s e r a h s d e t c i r t s e R . d e s i c r e x e s n o i t p o k c o t S n o i t a s n e p m o c d e s a b k c o t S . . d e r i u q c a k c o t s y r u s a e r T g n i l l o r t n o c n o n o t s n o i t u b i r t s i D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . s t s e r e t n i e m o c n i t e n d e t a d i l o s n o C s s o l e v i s n e h e r p m o c r e h t O 2 1 0 2 , 1 3 r e b m e c e D t a e c n a l a B 72 N O I T A R O P R O C R E K U R B ) d e u n i t n o C ( Y T I U Q E ’ S R E D L O H E R A H S F O S T N E M E T A T S D E T A D I L O S N O C ) a t a d e r a h s t p e c x e , s n o i l l i m n I ( l a t o T ’ s r e d l o h e r a h S y t i u q E g n i l l o r t n o c n o N n i s t s e r e t n I d e t a d i l o s n o C s e i r a i d i s b u S l a t o T ’ s r e d l o h e r a h S y t i u q E o t e l b a t u b i r t t A r e k u r B n o i t a r o p r o C 7 . 9 0 7 $ 1 . 3 $ 6 . 6 0 7 $ d e t a l u m u c c A r e h t O e v i s n e h e r p m o C e m o c n I 8 . 7 3 1 $ l a n o i t i d d A y r u s a e r T d e n i a t e R s g n i n r a E n I - d i a P l a t i p a C k c o t S t n u o m A y r u s a e r T s e r a h S n o m m o C k c o t S t n u o m A n o m m o C s e r a h S 0 . 9 1 5 $ 3 . 8 4 $ ) 2 . 0 ( $ 9 4 5 , 1 2 7 . 1 $ 7 2 4 , 4 0 6 , 6 6 1 — 4 . 8 6 . 6 ) 2 . 0 ( ) 6 . 0 ( 8 . 1 8 5 . 4 4 2 . 0 5 8 $ — — — — ) 6 . 0 ( 7 . 1 ) 1 . 0 ( 1 . 4 $ — 4 . 8 6 . 6 ) 2 . 0 ( — 1 . 0 8 6 . 4 4 — — — — — — 6 . 4 4 — — — — — — 1 . 0 8 — 4 . 8 6 . 6 2 . 0 — — — — — — — — — ) 4 . 0 ( 6 8 2 , 8 1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 7 0 , 1 2 1 1 9 9 , 1 7 8 ) 6 8 2 , 8 1 ( 1 . 6 4 8 $ 4 . 2 8 1 $ 1 . 9 9 5 $ 5 . 3 6 $ ) 6 . 0 ( $ 5 3 8 , 9 3 7 . 1 $ 4 0 2 , 9 7 5 , 7 6 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . s t n e m e t a t s l a i c n a n i f e s e h t f o t r a p l a r g e t n i n a e r a s e t o n g n i y n a p m o c c a e h T s t s e r e t n i g n i l l o r t n o c n o n o t s n o i t u b i r t s i D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . e m o c n i t e n d e t a d i l o s n o C ) s s o l ( e m o c n i e v i s n e h e r p m o c r e h t O . . . 3 1 0 2 , 1 3 r e b m e c e D t a e c n a l a B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . n o i t a s n e p m o c d e s a b . d e s i c r e x e s n o i t p o k c o t S k c o t S . d e r i u q c a k c o t s y r u s a e r T d e u s s i s e r a h s d e t c i r t s e R 2 1 0 2 , 1 3 r e b m e c e D t a e c n a l a B 73 BRUKER CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (In millions) Cash flows from operating activities: Consolidated net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net income to cash flows from operating activities: Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Write down of demonstration inventories to net realizable value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Impairment of assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gain on disposal of product line . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other non-cash expenses, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions: Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts payable and accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income taxes payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Customer advances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other changes in operating assets and liabilities, net Year Ended December 31, 2013 2012 2011 $ 81.8 $ 78.2 $ 94.0 61.3 32.7 — 6.6 7.4 (0.9) 2.1 (19.3) 5.7 7.0 (33.7) 4.6 (12.1) 1.8 59.1 31.5 23.8 7.8 (11.7) (2.2) 4.9 1.6 (49.5) 4.6 (2.4) (4.4) (4.6) (3.6) 52.9 30.0 — 7.9 (4.8) — 1.2 (52.8) (103.3) 23.4 (0.8) 17.4 31.3 (8.7) Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145.0 133.1 87.7 Cash flows from investing activities: Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Disposal of product line . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Purchases of property, plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sales of property, plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash used in investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash flows from financing activities: Repayments of revolving lines of credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from revolving lines of credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from Note Purchase Agreement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Repayment of other debt, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Payment of deferred financing costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net Excess tax benefit related to exercise of stock awards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Changes in restricted cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash payments to noncontrolling interests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash provided by financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (11.6) 0.5 (50.3) 1.4 (60.0) — 19.5 — (1.6) — 8.2 — 1.0 (0.6) 26.5 16.6 Net change in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128.1 310.6 (27.0) 3.3 (72.8) 3.3 (93.2) (216.5) 93.0 240.0 (83.2) (1.4) 4.5 — (1.4) (0.6) 34.4 (9.7) 64.6 246.0 (14.3) — (61.6) 7.2 (68.7) — 30.7 — (29.3) (1.3) 3.3 0.2 0.1 (0.4) 3.3 (6.7) 15.6 230.4 Cash and cash equivalents at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $438.7 $ 310.6 $ 246.0 Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: Cash paid for interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 12.7 $ 10.1 $ 6.7 Cash paid for taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 84.3 $ 79.9 $ 69.7 Non-cash financing activities: Issuance of common stock in connection with acquisition of Michrom Bioresources Inc. . . . . . . $ — $ — $ 2.9 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 74 BRUKER CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 1—Description of Business Bruker Corporation, together with its consolidated subsidiaries (‘‘Bruker’’ or the ‘‘Company’’), is a designer and manufacturer of proprietary life science and materials research systems and associated products that address the rapidly evolving needs of a diverse array of customers in life science, pharmaceutical, biotechnology, clinical and molecular diagnostics research, and materials and chemical analysis in various industries and government applications. The Company has two reporting segments, Bruker Scientific Instruments (BSI), which represents approximately 93% of the Company’s revenues during the year ended December 31, 2013, and Energy & Supercon Technologies (BEST), which represents the remainder of the business. Within BSI, the Company is organized into three operating segments: the Bruker BioSpin Group, the Bruker CALID Group and the Bruker MAT Group. For financial reporting purposes, the Bruker BioSpin, Bruker CALID and Bruker MAT operating segments are aggregated into the BSI reporting segment because each has similar economic characteristics, production processes, service offerings, types and classes of customers, methods of distribution and regulatory environments. Bruker BioSpin—Bruker BioSpin designs, manufactures and distributes enabling life science tools based on magnetic resonance and preclinical imaging technologies. Bruker BioSpin’s Magnetic Resonance division sells various systems utilizing magnetic resonance technology, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems, nuclear magnetic resonance systems (NMR), and electron paramagnetic resonance systems (EPR) as well as OEM MRI magnets to medical device manufacturers. Bruker BioSpin’s preclinical imaging division sells single and multiple modality systems using MRI, position emission tomography (PET), single photon emission tomography (SPECT), computed tomography (CT), magnetic particle imaging (MPI) and optical imaging (fluorescence and bioluminescence) technologies to preclinical markets. Bruker CALID (Chemicals, Applied Markets, Life Science, In-Vitro Diagnostics, Detection)— Bruker CALID designs, manufactures and distributes life science mass spectrometry instruments that can be integrated and used along with other sample preparation or chromatography instruments, as well as Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear and Explosive (CBRNE) detection products and instruments based on Raman molecular spectroscopy technologies. Bruker CALID’s mass spectrometry units are typically used in applications of expression proteomics, clinical proteomics, metabolic and peptide biomarker profiling, drug discovery and development, molecular diagnostics research, molecular and systems biology, and basic molecular medicine research and clinical microbiology (for research use only outside the European Union). Bruker MAT (Materials)—Bruker MAT designs, manufactures and distributes spectroscopy and microscopy instruments for the understanding of composition and structure in material science and life science samples. The instruments are based on advanced technologies in X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF), X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray micro computed tomography ((cid:1)CT), atomic force microscopy (AFM), stylus and optical metrology (SOM), fluorescence microscopy (FM), analytical tools for electron microscopes, handheld, portable, and mobile X-ray fluorescence, and spark optical emission spectroscopy systems. The Company’s BEST reporting segment develops and manufactures superconducting and non-superconducting materials and devices for use in renewable energy, energy infrastructure, healthcare and ‘‘big science’’ research. The segment focuses on metallic low temperature superconductors for use in magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear magnetic resonance, fusion energy research and other applications, and ceramic high temperature superconductors primarily for energy grid and magnet applications. 75 Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies The accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect the application of certain significant accounting policies as described below and elsewhere in these notes to the consolidated financial statements. Principles of Consolidation The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all majority and wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Noncontrolling Interests Noncontrolling interests represents the minority shareholders’ proportionate share of the Company’s majority-owned indirect subsidiaries. The portion of net income or net loss attributable to non-controlling interests is presented as net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiaries in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, and the portion of other comprehensive income of these subsidiaries is presented in the consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity. Subsequent Events The Company has evaluated all subsequent events and determined that there are no material recognized or unrecognized subsequent events. Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash equivalents primarily include cash on hand, money market funds and time deposits with original maturities of three months or less at the date of acquisition. Time deposits represent amounts on deposit in banks and temporarily invested in instruments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase. Certain of these investments represent deposits which are not insured by the FDIC or any other government agency. Cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates market value. Restricted Cash Certain customers require the Company to provide bank guarantees on customer advances. Generally, lines of credit satisfy this requirement. However, to the extent the required guarantee exceeds the available local line of credit, the Company maintains restricted cash balances. Restricted cash balances are classified as non-current unless, under the terms of the applicable agreements, the funds will be released from restrictions within one year from the balance sheet date. At December 31, 2013, the Company had $6.7 million of restricted cash, of which $4.0 million was classified as non-current. At December 31, 2012, the Company had $7.6 million of restricted cash, of which $3.9 million was classified as non-current. Derivative Financial Instruments All derivatives, whether designated in a hedging relationship or not, are recorded on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value. The accounting for changes in fair value of a derivative instrument depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship and further, on the type of hedging relationship. For those derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments, the Company must designate the hedging instrument, based on the 76 exposure being hedged, as a fair value hedge, cash flow hedge or a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation. A fair value hedge is a derivative instrument designated for the purpose of hedging the exposure of changes in fair value of an asset or a liability resulting from a particular risk. If the derivative is designated as a fair value hedge, the changes in the fair value of the derivative and of the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk are both recognized in the same caption in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. Fair Value The Company applies the following hierarchy to determine the fair value of financial instruments, which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into three levels and bases the categorization within the hierarchy upon the lowest level of input that is available and significant to the fair value measurement. The levels in the hierarchy are defined as follows: (cid:127) Level 1: Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. (cid:127) Level 2: Inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. (cid:127) Level 3: Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. The valuation techniques that may be used by the Company to determine the fair value of Level 2 and Level 3 financial instruments are the market approach, the income approach and the cost approach. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. The income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts to a single present value based on current market expectations about those future amounts, including present value techniques, option-pricing models and the excess earnings method. The cost approach is based on the amount that would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset (replacement cost). The Company’s financial instruments consist primarily of cash equivalents, restricted cash, derivative instruments consisting of forward foreign exchange contracts, commodity contracts, derivatives embedded in certain purchase and sale contracts, accounts receivable, short-term borrowings, accounts payable, contingent consideration and long-term debt. The carrying amounts of the Company’s cash equivalents and restricted cash, accounts receivable, short-term borrowings and accounts payable approximate fair value due to their short-term nature. Derivative assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The Company’s long-term debt consists principally of a private placement arrangement entered into in 2012 with various fixed interest rates based on the maturity date. The Company has evaluated the estimated fair value of financial instruments using available market information and management’s estimates. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies could have a significant effect on the estimated fair value amounts. Concentration of Credit Risk Financial instruments which subject the Company to credit risk consist of cash and cash equivalents, derivative instruments, accounts receivables and restricted cash. The risk with respect to cash and cash equivalents is minimized by the Company’s policy of investing in short-term financial instruments issued by highly-rated financial institutions. The risk with respect to derivative instruments 77 is minimized by the Company’s policy of entering into arrangements with highly-rated financial institutions. The risk with respect to accounts receivables is minimized by the creditworthiness and diversity of the Company’s customers. The Company performs periodic credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and generally requires an advanced deposit for a portion of the purchase price. Credit losses have been within management’s expectations and the allowance for doubtful accounts totaled $7.9 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, no single customer represented 10% of the Company’s accounts receivable. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, no single customer represented 10% of the Company’s total revenue. Inventories Components of inventory include raw materials, work-in-process, demonstration units and finished goods. Demonstration units include systems which are located in the Company’s demonstration laboratories or installed at the sites of potential customers and are considered available for sale. Finished goods include in-transit systems that have been shipped to the Company’s customers, but not yet installed and accepted by the customer. All inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined principally by the first-in, first-out method for a majority of subsidiaries and by average-cost for certain other subsidiaries. The Company reduces the carrying value of its inventories for differences between cost and estimated net realizable value, taking into consideration usage in the preceding twelve months, expected demand, technological obsolescence and other information including the physical condition of demonstration and in-transit inventories. The Company records a charge to cost of revenue for the amount required to reduce the carrying value of inventory to net realizable value. Costs associated with the procurement of inventories, such as inbound freight charges and purchasing and receiving costs, are capitalized as part of inventory and are also included in the cost of revenue line item within the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Major improvements are capitalized while expenditures for maintenance, repairs and minor improvements are charged to expense as incurred. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the assets and related accumulated depreciation and amortization are eliminated from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. Depreciation and amortization are calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows: Buildings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Machinery and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Computer equipment and software . . . . . . . . . Furniture and fixtures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Leasehold improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lesser of 15 years or the remaining lease term 25-40 years 3-10 years 3-5 years 3-10 years Goodwill and Intangible Assets Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized, but are evaluated for impairment on an annual basis, or on an interim basis when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. In assessing the recoverability of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, the Company must make assumptions regarding the estimated future cash flows, and other factors, to determine the fair value of these assets. If these estimates or their related assumptions change in the future, the Company may be required to record impairment charges against these assets in the reporting period in which the impairment is determined. 78 The Company tests goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level, which is the operating segment or one level below an operating segment. The Company has the option of performing a qualitative assessment to determine whether further impairment testing is necessary before performing the two-step quantitative assessment. If as a result of the qualitative assessment, it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, a quantitative impairment test will be required. Otherwise, no further testing will be required. If a quantitative impairment test is performed, the first step involves comparing the fair values of the applicable reporting units with their aggregate carrying values, including goodwill. The Company generally determines fair value of reporting units using a weighting of both the market and the income methodologies. Estimating the fair value of the reporting units requires significant judgment by management. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, the Company performs the second step of the goodwill impairment test to measure the amount of the impairment. In the second step of the goodwill impairment test the Company compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying value of that goodwill. Acquired in process research and development, or IPR&D, acquired as part of business combinations under the acquisition method represents ongoing development work associated with enhancements to existing products, as well as the development of next generation products. IPR&D is initially capitalized at fair value as an intangible asset with an indefinite life and assessed for impairment on an annual basis, or when indicators of impairment are identified. When the IPR&D project is complete, it is reclassified as a finite-lived intangible asset and is amortized over its estimated useful life, typically seven to ten years. If an IPR&D project is abandoned before completion or is otherwise determined to be impaired, the value of the asset or the amount of the impairment is charged to the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income in the period the project is abandoned or impaired. Intangible assets with a finite useful life are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives as follows: Existing technology and related patents . . . . . . Customer and distributor relationships . . . . . . . Trade names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-10 years 5-12 years 5-10 years Impairment of Long-Lived Assets Impairment losses are recorded on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and the quoted market price, if available, or the estimated fair value of those assets are less than the assets’ carrying value. Impairment losses are charged to the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for the difference between the fair value and carrying value of the asset. Warranty Costs and Deferred Revenue The Company typically provides a one year parts and labor warranty with the purchase of equipment. The anticipated cost for this warranty is accrued upon recognition of the sale and is included as a current liability on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The Company’s warranty reserve reflects estimated material and labor costs for potential product issues for which the Company expects to incur an obligation. The Company’s estimates of anticipated rates of warranty claims and costs are primarily based on historical information and future forecasts. The Company assesses the adequacy of the warranty reserve on a quarterly basis and adjusts the amount as necessary. If the historical data used to calculate the adequacy of the warranty reserve is not indicative of future requirements, additional or reduced warranty reserves may be required. 79 The Company also offers to its customers extended warranty and service agreements extending beyond the initial warranty for a fee. These fees are recorded as deferred revenue and recognized ratably into income over the life of the extended warranty contract or service agreement. Income Taxes Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the income tax basis of assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is applied against any net deferred tax asset if, based on the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The Company records liabilities related to uncertain tax positions in accordance with the guidance that clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a Company’s financial statements. This guidance prescribes a minimum recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Customer Advances The Company typically requires an advance deposit under the terms and conditions of contracts with customers. These deposits are recorded as a liability until revenue is recognized on the specific contract in accordance with the Company’s revenue recognition policy. Revenue Recognition The Company recognizes revenue from systems sales when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the price is fixed or determinable, title and risk of loss has been transferred to the customer and collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. Title and risk of loss is generally transferred upon customer acceptance and evidence of installation for a system that has been delivered to the customer. When products are sold through an independent distributor or a strategic distribution partner who assumes responsibility for installation, the Company recognizes the system sale when the product has been shipped and title and risk of loss have been transferred to the distributor. The Company’s distributors do not have price protection rights or rights of return; however, the Company’s products are typically warranted to be free from defect for a period of one year. Revenue is deferred until cash is received when collectability is not reasonably assured or when the price is not fixed or determinable. For transactions entered into subsequent to the adoption of ASU No. 2009-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605)—Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, that include multiple elements, arrangement consideration is allocated to each element using the fair value hierarchy as required by ASU No. 2009-13. The Company limits the amount of revenue recognized for delivered elements to the amount that is not contingent on the future delivery of products or services, future performance obligations, or subject to customer-specific return or refund privileges. The Company attempts to determine the fair value of its products and services based on vendor specific objective evidence (‘‘VSOE’’). The Company determines VSOE based on its normal selling pricing and discounting practices for the specific product or service when sold on a stand-alone basis. In determining VSOE, the Company’s policy requires a substantial majority of selling prices for a product or service to be within a reasonably narrow range. The Company also considers the class of customer, method of distribution and the geographies into which products and services are being sold when determining VSOE. 80 If VSOE cannot be established, which may occur in instances where a product or service has not been sold separately, stand-alone sales are too infrequent or product pricing is not within a sufficiently narrow range, the Company attempts to establish the selling price based on third-party evidence (‘‘TPE’’). TPE is determined based on competitor prices for similar deliverables when sold separately. The Company, however, is typically not able to determine TPE for its products or services. Generally, the Company’s offerings contain a significant level of differentiation such that the comparable pricing of products with similar functionality cannot be determined. Furthermore, the Company is unable to reliably determine the selling prices on a stand-alone basis of similar products offered by its competitors. When the Company cannot determine VSOE or TPE, it uses estimated selling price (‘‘ESP’’) in its allocation of arrangement consideration. The objective of ESP is to determine the price at which the Company would typically transact a stand-alone sale of the product or service. ESP is determined by considering a number of factors including the Company’s pricing policies, internal costs and gross profit objectives, method of distribution, market research and information, recent technological trends, competitive landscape and geographies. The Company analyzes the selling prices used in its allocation of arrangement consideration, at a minimum, on an annual basis. Selling prices will be analyzed more frequently if a significant change in the Company’s business or other factors necessitate more frequent analysis or if the Company experiences significant variances in its selling prices. Revenue from accessories and parts is recognized upon shipment and service revenue is recognized as the services are performed. The Company also has contracts for which it applies the percentage-of-completion model and completed contract model of revenue recognition. Application of the percentage-of-completion method requires the Company to make reasonable estimates of the extent of progress toward completion of the contract and the total costs the Company will incur under the contract. Changes in the estimates could affect the timing of revenue recognition. Other revenues are primarily comprised of licensing arrangements. Licensing revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the related contract. Shipping and Handling Costs The Company includes costs incurred in connection with shipping and handling of products within selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying statements of income and comprehensive income. Shipping and handling costs were $26.7 million, $30.5 million and $28.7 million in the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Amounts billed to customers in connection with these costs are included in total revenues. Research and Development Research and development costs are expensed as incurred and include salaries, wages and other personnel related costs, material costs and depreciation, consulting costs and facility costs. Software Costs Purchased software is capitalized at cost and is amortized over the estimated useful life, generally three years. Software developed for use in the Company’s products is expensed as incurred until technological feasibility is reasonably assured and is classified as research and development expense. Subsequent to the achievement of technological feasibility, amounts are capitalizable, however, to date such amounts have not been material. 81 Advertising The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising expenses were $9.6 million, $7.5 million and $8.1 million during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Stock-Based Compensation The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income based on the fair value of the share-based award at the grant date. The Company’s primary types of share-based compensation are stock options and restricted stock. The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, as follows (in millions): Stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2013 2012 2011 $5.3 1.3 $6.6 $6.5 1.3 $7.8 $6.6 1.3 $7.9 Compensation expense is amortized on a straight-line basis over the underlying vesting terms of the share-based award. Stock options to purchase the Company’s common stock are periodically awarded to executive officers and other employees of the Company, and members of the Company’s Board of Directors, subject to a vesting period of three to five years. The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Assumptions regarding volatility, expected term, dividend yield and risk-free interest rate are required for the Black- Scholes model and are presented in the table below: 2013 2012 2011 Risk-free interest rate . . . . . . . . . . . . Expected life . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Volatility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expected dividend yield . . . . . . . . . .. 1.07%-2.45% 0.91%-1.78% 1.24%-3.12% 6.5 years 57.2% — 6.5 years 54.9% — 6.5 years 55.9% — The risk-free interest rate is based on the yield on zero-coupon U.S. Treasury securities for a period that is commensurate with the expected life assumption. Expected life is determined through the simplified method as defined in the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 110. The Company believes that this is the best estimate of the expected term of a new option. Expected volatility is based on a number of factors, but the Company currently believes that the exclusive use of its historical volatility results in the best estimate of the grant-date fair value of employee stock options because it reflects the market’s current expectations of future volatility. The expected dividend yield was not considered in the option pricing formula since the Company does not pay dividends and has no current plans to do so in the future. The terms of certain of the Company’s indebtedness currently restrict its ability to pay dividends to its shareholders. The weighted average fair values of options granted was $10.37, $7.11 and $7.89 per share for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. In addition, the Company utilizes an estimated forfeiture rate when calculating the stock-based compensation expense for the period. The Company has applied estimated forfeiture rates derived from an analysis of historical data of 7.0%, 5.7% and 5.2% for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, in determining the expense recorded in the accompanying consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. 82 Earnings Per Share Net income per common share attributable to Bruker Corporation shareholders is calculated by dividing net income attributable to Bruker Corporation by the weighted-average shares outstanding during the period. The diluted net income per share computation includes the effect of shares, which would be issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options and the vesting of restricted stock, reduced by the number of shares, which are assumed to be purchased by the Company under the treasury stock method. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding for the years ended December 31, (in millions, except per share data): 2013 2012 2011 Net income attributable to Bruker Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 80.1 $ 77.5 $ 92.3 Weighted average shares outstanding: Weighted average shares outstanding-basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Effect of dilutive securities: 166.5 166.0 165.4 Stock options and restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.0 1.4 1.5 Weighted average shares outstanding-diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168.5 167.4 166.9 Net income per common share attributable to Bruker Corporation shareholders: Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.48 $ 0.47 $ 0.56 Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.48 $ 0.46 $ 0.55 Stock options to purchase approximately 0.4 million shares, 0.6 million shares and 0.1 million shares were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, because their effect would have been anti-dilutive. Employee Retirement Plans The Company recognizes the over-funded or under-funded status of defined benefit pension and other postretirement defined benefit plans as an asset or liability, respectively, in its consolidated balance sheets and recognizes changes in the funded status in the year in which the changes occur through other comprehensive income. Other Comprehensive Income Other comprehensive income refers to revenues, expenses, gains and losses that are excluded from net income as these amounts are recorded directly as an adjustment to shareholders’ equity, net of tax. The Company’s other comprehensive income is composed primarily of foreign currency translation adjustments and changes in the funded status of defined benefit pension plans. Foreign Currency Translation Assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries, where the functional currency is the local currency, are translated into U.S. dollars using year-end exchange rates, or historical rates, as appropriate. Revenues and expenses of foreign subsidiaries are translated at the average exchange rates in effect during the year. Adjustments resulting from financial statement translations are included as a separate component of shareholders’ equity. Gains and losses resulting from translation of foreign currency monetary transactions are reported in interest and other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for all periods presented. The Company has certain intercompany foreign currency transactions that are deemed to be of a long-term 83 investment nature. Exchange adjustments related to those transactions are made directly to a separate component of shareholders’ equity. Risk and Uncertainties The Company is subject to risks common to its industry including, but not limited to, global economic conditions, rapid technological change, spending patterns from its customers, protection of its intellectual property, availability of key raw materials and components, compliance with existing and future regulation by government agencies, dependence on key personnel and fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Contingencies The Company is subject to proceedings, lawsuits and other claims related to patents, product and other matters. The Company assesses the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes to these matters as well as potential ranges of probable losses. A determination of the amount of reserves required, if any, for these contingencies is made after analysis of each individual issue. The required reserves may change in the future due to new developments in each situation or changes in settlement strategy in assessing these matters. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates and judgments made by management in preparing these financial statements include revenue recognition, allowances for doubtful accounts, writedowns for excess and obsolete inventory, estimated fair values used to record impairment charges related to intangible assets, goodwill, and other long-lived assets, amortization periods, expected future cash flows used to evaluate the recoverability of long-lived assets, stock-based compensation expense, warranty allowances, restructuring and other related charges, contingent liabilities and the recoverability of the Company’s net deferred tax assets. Although the Company regularly reassesses the assumptions underlying these estimates, actual results could differ materially from these estimates. Changes in estimates are recorded in the period in which they become known. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from management’s estimates if these results differ from historical experience or other assumptions prove not to be substantially accurate, even if such assumptions are reasonable when made. Reclassifications Certain line items in prior period financial statements, including reclassifications within product cost of revenue, service cost of revenue and selling, general and administrative expenses, as well as certain footnote disclosures, including Note 7—Property Plant and Equipment, have been reclassified. These amounts are not material and had no effect on previously reported net income or cash flows. 84 Note 3—Acquisitions In March 2012, the Company completed the acquisition of SkyScan N.V. (the ‘‘SkyScan business’’), a privately owned company based in Belgium that provides advanced, high-resolution micro-computed tomography systems for three-dimensional X-ray imaging in preclinical imaging applications and materials research markets. The Company expects synergies from combining the SkyScan business into its current product portfolio. The acquisition of the SkyScan business is accounted for under the acquisition method. The components and fair value allocation of the consideration transferred in connection with the SkyScan business are as follows (in millions): Consideration Transferred: Cash paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash acquired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Contingent consideration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 24.6 (2.9) 4.0 Total consideration transferred . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 25.7 Allocation of Consideration Transferred: Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property, plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intangible assets: Existing technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Customer relationships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Liabilities assumed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3.1 6.6 0.3 2.3 7.2 6.4 10.6 (10.8) Total consideration transferred . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 25.7 The fair value allocation includes contingent consideration in the amount of $4.0 million, which represents the estimated fair value of future payments to the former shareholders of the SkyScan business based on achieving annual revenue targets for the years 2012-2014. The maximum potential future payments related to the contingent consideration is capped at approximately $5.9 million. The annual revenue target for 2012 was achieved and the applicable contingent consideration paid in 2013. The Company’s allocation of the consideration transferred in connection with the acquisition of the SkyScan business was finalized in the first quarter of 2013 and measurement date adjustments were not material. The weighted-average amortization period for intangible assets acquired in connection with the SkyScan business is 7 years for existing technology and 10 years for customer relationships. The results of the SkyScan business, including the amount allocated to goodwill, have been included in the BSI segment from the date of acquisition. Pro forma financial information reflecting the acquisition of the SkyScan business has not been presented because the impact on revenues, net income and net income per common share attributable to Bruker Corporation shareholders is not material. 85 Note 4—Fair Value of Financial Instruments The Company measures the following financial assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis. The following tables set forth the Company’s financial instruments and presents them within the fair value hierarchy using the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement at December 31, 2013 and 2012 (in millions): Quoted Prices in Active Markets Available (Level 1) Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) December 31, 2013 Assets: Cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restricted cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign exchange contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Embedded derivatives in purchase and delivery contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fixed price commodity contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term restricted cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total $ 6.8 2.7 2.3 0.2 0.1 4.0 Total assets recorded at fair value . . . . . . . . . . $16.1 $13.5 Liabilities: Contingent consideration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Embedded derivatives in purchase and delivery $ 7.0 $ — contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.4 Total liabilities recorded at fair value . . . . . . . . $ 7.4 — $ — December 31, 2012 Assets: Cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restricted cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign exchange contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Embedded derivatives in purchase and delivery contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term restricted cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total $ 8.2 3.7 1.8 0.3 3.9 Total assets recorded at fair value . . . . . . . . . . $17.9 $15.8 Liabilities: Contingent consideration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Embedded derivatives in purchase and delivery contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fixed price commodity contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3.7 $ — 0.3 0.2 — — Total liabilities recorded at fair value . . . . . . . . $ 4.2 $ — $ 6.8 2.7 — — — 4.0 $ 8.2 3.7 — — 3.9 $ — — 2.3 0.2 0.1 $2.6 $ — 0.4 $0.4 $ — — — — — $ — $7.0 — $7.0 $ — — 1.8 0.3 — $2.1 $ — 0.3 0.2 $0.5 $ — — — — — $ — $3.7 — — $3.7 Quoted Prices in Active Markets Available (Level 1) Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Derivative financial instruments are classified within level 2 because there is not an active market for each derivative contract, however, the inputs used to calculate the value of the instruments are obtained from active markets. 86 The fair value of the long-term fixed interest rate debt, which has been classified as Level 2, was $244.1 and $255.6 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, based on market and observable sources with similar maturity dates. The Company measures certain assets and liabilities at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings. Fair value treatment may be elected either upon initial recognition of an eligible asset or liability or, for an existing asset or liability, if an event triggers a new basis of accounting. The Company did not elect to remeasure any of its existing financial assets or liabilities during the year ended December 31, 2013. As part of certain acquisitions in 2013 and 2012, the Company recorded contingent consideration liabilities that have been classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. The contingent consideration represents the estimated fair value of future payments to the former shareholders of applicable acquired companies based on achieving annual revenue targets in certain years as specified in the purchase and sale agreements. The Company initially valued the contingent consideration by using the discounted cash flow method. Changes to the fair value of the contingent consideration recognized in earnings for the years ended December 31, 2013 was $1.5 million and was recorded to other charges, net in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. The following table sets forth the changes in contingent consideration liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 (in millions): Balance at December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current period additions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current period adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current period settlements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign currency effect Balance at December 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current period additions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current period adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current period settlements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign currency effect $ — 3.7 — — — 3.7 5.8 (1.5) (1.3) 0.3 Balance at December 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7.0 Note 5—Accounts Receivable The following is a summary of trade accounts receivable at December 31, (in millions): Gross accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Allowance for doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $315.5 (7.9) $297.2 (7.9) Accounts receivable, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $307.6 $289.3 2013 2012 The allowance for doubtful accounts is management’s estimate of credit losses in the accounts receivable. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on a number of factors, including an evaluation of customer credit worthiness, the age of the outstanding receivable, economic trends and historical experience. The allowance for doubtful accounts is reviewed on a quarterly basis and changes in estimates are reflected in the period in which they become known. The Company records account balances against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. Provisions for doubtful accounts are recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. 87 The following is a summary of the activity in the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts at December 31, (in millions): Balance at Beginning of Period Additions Charged to Expense Deductions Amounts Written Off Balance at End of Period 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $7.9 5.6 5.1 $1.3 3.0 0.9 $(1.3) (0.7) (0.4) $7.9 7.9 5.6 Note 6—Inventories Inventories consisted of the following at December 31, (in millions): Raw materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Work-in-process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Finished goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Demonstration units . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $189.7 196.5 155.3 48.3 $199.0 197.0 160.5 55.0 Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $589.8 $611.5 2013 2012 Finished goods include in-transit systems that have been shipped to the Company’s customers but not yet installed and accepted by the customer. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, inventory-in-transit was $81.9 million and $93.9 million, respectively. The Company reduces the carrying value of its demonstration inventories for differences between its cost and estimated net realizable value through a charge to cost of product revenue that is based on a number of factors including the age of the unit, the physical condition of the unit and an assessment of technological obsolescence. Amounts recorded in cost of revenue related to the write-down of demonstration units to net realizable value were $32.7 million, $31.5 million and $30.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Note 7—Property, Plant and Equipment The following is a summary of property, plant and equipment by major asset class at December 31, (in millions): Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Building and leasehold improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Machinery, equipment, software and furniture and fixtures . . . . . $ 34.9 301.7 362.6 $ 33.8 271.9 337.3 Less accumulated depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . 699.2 (399.7) 643.0 (359.4) Property, plant and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 299.5 $ 283.6 2013 2012 Depreciation expense, which includes the amortization of leasehold improvements, for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $40.5 million, $37.1 million and $34.8 million, respectively. The Company recorded an impairment charge for the year ended December 31, 2012 in the amount of $6.0 million, related to property, plant and equipment within the Chemical and Applied Markets (CAM) division within the BSI segment as a result of experiencing increased deterioration in 88 its financial performance and the BEST segment based on the abandonment of a project, to reduce the carrying value of those assets to their estimated fair values. The charge is recorded within ‘‘Impairment of assets’’ in the accompanying statements of income and comprehensive income. Note 8—Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets The following table sets forth the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 (in millions): Balance at December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Acquisitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Impairment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current period adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign currency impact . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance at December 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Acquisitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current period adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign currency impact . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $100.2 10.5 (1.4) 6.1 0.5 115.9 9.2 0.8 1.5 Balance at December 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $127.4 At December 31, 2013 and 2012, all goodwill was allocated to the BSI segment. The goodwill acquired in 2013 relates to the acquisition of Prairie Technologies, Inc., a provider of life science fluorescence microscopy products. The goodwill acquired in 2012 predominantly relates to the acquisition of the SkyScan business. At December 31, 2013, the Company performed its annual impairment evaluation using a qualitative approach and no impairment was recorded. At December 31, 2012, the Company performed its annual impairment evaluation using a quantitative approach and concluded all reporting units’ fair values exceeded their carrying values, with the exception of the CAM division, as a result of increased deterioration in its financial performance. The Company, therefore, performed step two of the impairment test to measure potential impairment and concluded an impairment charge of $1.4 million was required. This amount represents all the goodwill allocated to the CAM division and is recorded within ‘‘Impairment of assets’’ in the accompanying statements of income and comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2012. There were no indefinite-lived intangible assets associated with the CAM division nor any impairment of indefinite-lived intangible assets during year ended December 31, 2012. No impairment losses were recorded on goodwill during the year ended December 31, 2011. 89 The following is a summary of intangible assets at December 31, (in millions): 2013 2012 Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Net Carrying Amount Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Net Carrying Amount Existing technology and related patents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Customer relationships . . . . . . . . . . . Trade names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $157.9 18.0 0.2 $(68.2) (7.8) (0.2) $ 89.7 10.2 — $151.5 15.3 0.2 $(47.6) (7.9) (0.2) $103.9 7.4 — Intangible assets subject to amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . In-process research and development . 176.1 5.7 (76.2) — 99.9 5.7 167.0 5.7 (55.7) — 111.3 5.7 Intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $181.8 $(76.2) $105.6 $172.7 $(55.7) $117.0 The Company determined the increased deterioration in financial performance in 2012 of the CAM division discussed above was an indicator requiring the evaluation of the definite-lived intangible assets within that reporting unit for recoverability. The Company performed a valuation at December 31, 2012 and determined that the definite-lived intangible assets within the CAM division were impaired. The Company recorded an impairment charge in the amount of $16.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 to reduce the carrying value of those assets to their estimated fair values. This impairment charge is included within ‘‘Impairment of assets’’ in the accompanying statements of income and comprehensive income. No impairment losses were recorded related to definite-lived intangible assets during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2011. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded amortization expense of approximately $20.8 million, $22.0 million and $18.1 million, respectively, in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. The estimated future amortization expense related to amortizable intangible assets at December 31, 2013 is as follows (in millions): 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $21.0 21.0 20.5 20.1 12.9 4.4 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $99.9 90 Note 9—Other Current Liabilities The following is a summary of other current liabilities at December 31, (in millions): Deferred revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income taxes payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued warranty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Derivative liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2013 2012 $ 88.1 88.0 9.5 26.7 0.6 84.9 $ 82.5 85.1 60.9 27.9 0.5 79.8 Other current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $297.8 $336.7 The following table sets forth the changes in accrued warranty for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 (in millions): Balance at December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accruals for warranties issued during the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Settlements of warranty claims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign currency impact . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance at December 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accruals for warranties issued during the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Settlements of warranty claims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign currency impact . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 27.9 15.7 (15.9) 0.2 27.9 15.6 (17.3) 0.5 Balance at December 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 26.7 Note 10—Debt The Company’s debt obligations consist of the following as of December 31, (in millions): US Dollar revolving loan under the Amended Credit Agreement . . US Dollar notes under the Note Purchase Agreement . . . . . . . . . . Capital lease obligations and other loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $112.5 240.0 2.5 $ 93.0 240.0 4.2 Total debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current portion of long-term debt 355.0 (0.7) 337.2 (1.3) Total long-term debt, less current portion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $354.3 $335.9 2013 2012 In May 2011, the Company entered into an amendment to, and restatement of, its credit agreement, referred to as the Amended Credit Agreement. The Amended Credit Agreement provides a maximum commitment on the Company’s revolving credit line of $250.0 million and a maturity date of May 2016. Borrowings under the revolving credit line of the Amended Credit Agreement accrue interest, at the Company’s option, at either (a) the greatest of (i) the prime rate, (ii) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% and (iii) adjusted LIBOR plus 1.00% or (b) LIBOR, plus margins ranging from 0.80% to 1.65%. There is also a facility fee ranging from 0.20% to 0.35%. Borrowings under the Amended Credit Agreement are secured by guarantees from certain material subsidiaries, as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement, and Bruker Energy & Supercon Technologies, Inc. The Amended Credit Agreement also requires the Company to maintain certain financial ratios related to maximum leverage and minimum interest coverage. Specifically, the 91 Company’s leverage ratio cannot exceed 3.0 and the Company’s interest coverage ratio cannot be less than 3.0. As of December 31, 2013, the Company was in compliance with the covenants of the Amended Credit Agreement. In addition to the financial ratios, the Amended Credit Agreement restricts, among other things, the Company’s ability to do the following: make certain payments; incur additional debt; incur certain liens; make certain investments, including derivative agreements; merge, consolidate, sell or transfer all or substantially all of its assets; and enter into certain transactions with affiliates. Failure to comply with any of these restrictions or covenants may result in an event of default on the Amended Credit Agreement, which could permit acceleration of the debt and require the Company to prepay the debt before its scheduled due date. The following is a summary of the maximum commitments and the net amounts available to the Company under the revolving loan arrangements at December 31, 2013 (in millions): Weighted Average Interest Rate Total Amount Committed by Outstanding Borrowings Lenders Outstanding Letters of Credit Total Amount Available Amended Credit Agreement . . . . . . . Other revolving loans . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.3% — Total revolving loans . . . . . . . . . . . $250.0 214.4 $464.4 $112.5 — $112.5 $ 0.6 170.6 $171.2 $136.9 43.8 $180.7 Other revolving loans are with various financial institutions located primarily in Germany, Switzerland and France. The Company’s other revolving lines of credit are typically due upon demand with interest payable monthly. Certain of these lines of credit are unsecured while others are secured by the accounts receivable and inventory of the related subsidiary. In January 2012, the Company entered into a note purchase agreement, referred to as the Note Purchase Agreement, with a group of accredited institutional investors. Pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement, the Company issued and sold $240.0 million of senior notes, referred to as the Senior Notes, which consist of the following: (cid:127) $20 million 3.16% Series 2012A Senior Notes, Tranche A, due January 18, 2017; (cid:127) $15 million 3.74% Series 2012A Senior Notes, Tranche B, due January 18, 2019; (cid:127) $105 million 4.31% Series 2012A Senior Notes, Tranche C, due January 18, 2022; and (cid:127) $100 million 4.46% Series 2012A Senior Notes, Tranche D, due January 18, 2024. Under the terms of the Note Purchase Agreement, the Company may issue and sell additional senior notes up to an aggregate principal amount of $600 million, subject to certain conditions. Interest on the Senior Notes is payable semi-annually on January 18 and July 18 of each year, commencing July 18, 2012. The Senior Notes are unsecured obligations of the Company and are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by certain of the Company’s direct and indirect subsidiaries. The Senior Notes rank pari passu in right of repayment with the Company’s other senior unsecured indebtedness. The Company may prepay some or all of the Senior Notes at any time in an amount not less than 10% of the original aggregate principal amount of the Senior Notes to be prepaid, at a price equal to the sum of (a) 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, and (b) the applicable make-whole amount, upon not less than 30 and no more than 60 days written notice to the holders of the Senior Notes. In the event of a change in control of the Company, as defined in the Note Purchase Agreement, the Company may be required to prepay the Notes at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest. 92 The Note Purchase Agreement contains affirmative covenants, including, without limitation, maintenance of corporate existence, compliance with laws, maintenance of insurance and properties, payment of taxes, addition of subsidiary guarantors and furnishing notices and other information. The Note Purchase Agreement also contains certain restrictive covenants that restrict the Company’s ability to, among other things, incur liens, transfer or sell assets, engage in certain mergers and consolidations and enter into transactions with affiliates. The Note Purchase Agreement also includes customary representations and warranties and events of default. In the case of an event of default arising from specified events of bankruptcy or insolvency, all outstanding Senior Notes will become due and payable immediately without further action or notice. In the case of payment events of defaults, any holder of Senior Notes affected thereby may declare all Senior Notes held by it due and payable immediately. In the case of any other event of default, a majority of the holders of the Senior Notes may declare all the Senior Notes to be due and payable immediately. Pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement, so long as any Senior Notes are outstanding the Company will not permit (i) its leverage ratio, as determined pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement, as of the end of any fiscal quarter to exceed 3.50 to 1.00, (ii) its interest coverage ratio as determined pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement as of the end of any fiscal quarter for any period of four consecutive fiscal quarters to be less than 2.50 to 1 or (iii) priority debt at any time to exceed 25% of consolidated net worth, as determined pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement. As of December 31, 2013, the Company was in compliance with the covenants of the Note Purchase Agreement. Annual maturities of long-term debt outstanding at December 31, 2013 are as follows (in millions): 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.7 0.7 113.2 20.1 0.1 220.2 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $355.0 Interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, was $13.4 million, $14.3 million and $7.3 million, respectively. Note 11—Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Interest Rate Risks The Company’s exposure to interest rate risk relates primarily to outstanding variable rate debt and adverse movements in the related short-term market rates. The most significant component of the Company’s interest rate risk relates to amounts outstanding under the Amended Credit Agreement which totaled $112.5 million at December 31, 2013. The Company currently has a higher level of fixed rate debt than variable rate debt, which limits the exposure to adverse movements in interest rates. Foreign Exchange Rate Risk Management The Company generates a substantial portion of its revenues and expenses in international markets, principally Germany and other countries in the European Union, Switzerland and Japan, which subjects its operations to the exposure of exchange rate fluctuations. The impact of currency exchange rate movement can be positive or negative in any period. The Company periodically enters into foreign currency contracts in order to minimize the volatility that fluctuations in exchange rates have on its monetary transactions. Under these arrangements, the Company typically agrees to 93 purchase a fixed amount of a foreign currency in exchange for a fixed amount of U.S. Dollars or other currencies on specified dates with maturities of less than twelve months. These transactions do not qualify for hedge accounting and, accordingly, the instrument is recorded at fair value with the corresponding gains and losses recorded in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. The Company had the following notional amounts outstanding under foreign currency contracts at December 31, (in millions): Buy December 31, 2013: Notional Amount in Buy Currency Sell Maturity Notional Amount in Fair Value of Assets U.S. Dollars Fair Value of Liabilities Euro . . . . . . . . . . . 40.4 U.S. Dollars Swiss Francs . . . . . . 37.9 U.S. Dollars January 2014 to March 2014 January 2014 54.5 41.4 $95.9 1.1 1.2 $2.3 December 31, 2012: Euro . . . . . . . . . . . 1.2 Australian Dollars January 2013 to $ 1.6 $ — Euro . . . . . . . . . . . 49.3 U.S. Dollars Swiss Francs . . . . . . U.S. Dollars . . . . . . 26.1 0.8 U.S. Dollars Mexican Pesos April 2013 January 2013 to October 2013 January 2013 January 2013 64.0 27.9 0.8 1.2 0.6 — — — $— $— — — — $94.3 $1.8 $— In addition, the Company periodically enters into purchase and sales contracts denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the parties to the transaction. The Company accounts for these transactions separately valuing the ‘‘embedded derivative’’ component of these contracts. The contracts, denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the transacting parties, amounted to $21.7 million for the delivery of products and $9.5 million for the purchase of products at December 31, 2013 and $40.2 million for the delivery of products and $10.3 million for the purchase of products at December 31, 2012. The changes in the fair value of these embedded derivatives are recorded in interest and other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. Commodity Price Risk Management The Company has an arrangement with a customer under which it has a firm commitment to deliver copper based superconductors at a fixed price. In order to minimize the volatility that fluctuations in the price of copper have on the Company’s sales of these commodities, the Company entered into commodity hedge contracts. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company had fixed price commodity contracts with notional amounts aggregating $3.4 million. The changes in the fair value of these commodity contracts are recorded in interest and other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. During the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company recognized $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, of losses in other comprehensive income and reclassified $1.3 million and $2.2 million, respectively, of losses from other comprehensive income and recognized into net income related to the effective portion of the interest rate swap designated as a hedging instrument that matured as of December 31, 2012. 94 The fair value of the derivative instruments described above are recorded in the consolidated balance sheets for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 as follows (in millions): Balance Sheet Location 2013 2012 Derivative assets: Foreign exchange contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other current assets Embedded derivatives in purchase and delivery contracts . . . . Other current assets Fixed price commodity contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other current assets $1.8 $2.3 0.2 0.3 0.1 — Derivative liabilities: Embedded derivatives in purchase and delivery contracts . . . . Other current liabilities 0.3 Fixed price commodity contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other current liabilities — 0.2 0.4 The impact on net income of unrealized gains and losses resulting from changes in the fair value of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments for the years ending December 31, are as follows (in millions): Foreign exchange contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Embedded derivatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fixed price commodity contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.5 (0.2) 0.3 $ 6.0 (0.2) — $(4.6) 1.6 — Income (expense), net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.6 $ 5.8 $(3.0) 2013 2012 2011 The amounts related to derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments are recorded in interest and other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. Note 12—Income Taxes The domestic and foreign components of income before taxes are as follows for the years ended December 31, (in millions): Domestic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (42.4) $ (11.6) $ (25.3) 170.8 149.9 167.0 2013 2012 2011 $124.6 $138.3 $145.5 95 The components of the income tax provision are as follows for the years ended December 31, (in millions): 2013 2012 2011 Current income tax (benefit) expense: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Federal State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.2 0.2 35.0 $ 1.4 0.9 69.5 $ (0.6) 0.2 56.7 Total current income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35.4 71.8 56.3 Deferred income tax (benefit): Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1.8) (0.6) 9.8 1.2 (3.8) — (0.9) (0.1) (12.9) Total deferred income tax (benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.4 (11.7) (4.8) Income tax provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $42.8 $ 60.1 $51.5 The income tax (benefit) provision differs from the tax provision computed at the U.S federal statutory rate due to the following significant components for the years ended December 31: Statutory tax rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign tax rate differential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Permanent differences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tax contingencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Change in tax rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Withholding taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State income taxes, net of federal benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Purchase accounting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tax credits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Change in valuation allowance for unbenefitted losses . . . . . . 2013 2012 2011 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% (7.2) (10.2) 18.7 12.0 3.0 (1.1) (0.7) 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.9 0.8 (9.5) (8.6) 0.1 0.6 2.6 5.5 (8.0) 12.8 6.1 0.2 — (0.3) (3.0) (5.1) (1.5) (0.8) Effective tax rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34.3% 43.5% 35.4% 96 The tax effect of temporary items that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows as of December 31, (in millions): 2013 2012 Deferred tax assets: Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net operating loss carryforwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Capital loss carryforwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign tax and other tax credit carryforwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign statutory reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unrealized currency gain/loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Warranty reserve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2.7 3.1 10.7 0.5 4.1 11.4 0.8 18.8 — 4.5 2.0 3.6 $ 1.3 0.8 8.6 0.8 2.2 10.6 — 15.5 15.0 4.8 3.1 0.6 Gross deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62.2 (42.4) 63.3 (39.9) Total deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19.8 23.4 Deferred tax liabilities: Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fixed assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign statutory reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intangibles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unrealized currency gain/loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.4 2.1 — 0.2 0.9 7.4 15.5 4.2 30.7 0.1 2.8 5.8 0.3 0.3 5.8 3.9 — 19.0 Net deferred tax liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(10.9) $ 4.4 The Company uses the liability method to account for income taxes. Under this method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the future tax consequences of differences between the tax and financial accounting bases of assets and liabilities at each reporting period. Deferred income taxes are based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the period in which these differences are expected to affect taxable income. A valuation allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the expected realized amounts. The Company can only recognize a deferred tax asset to the extent this it is ‘‘more likely than not’’ that these assets will be realized. After considering all available positive and negative evidence, the Company established a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets in certain jurisdictions as it is more likely than not that these assets will not be realized. In determining the realizability of these assets, the Company considered numerous factors including historical profitability, the character and estimated future taxable income, prudent and feasible tax planning strategies, and the industry in which it operates. The Company fully reserved all U.S. net deferred tax assets, which are predominantly net operating losses and tax credit carryforwards. The Company’s valuation allowance at December 31, 2013 increased by $2.5 million from the balance at December 31, 2012, due primarily to unbenefited losses and credits in the U.S. Also during 2013, the Company reduced its beginning-of-the-year valuation allowance by $3.3 million to account for deferred tax liabilities recorded in conjunction with 97 the acquisition of Prairie Technologies, Inc. that caused a change in judgment with respect to the realizability of the Company’s deferred tax assets in future years. As of December 31, 2013, the Company has approximately $30.3 million of U.S. net operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future state taxable income which expire at various times through 2033 and approximately $54.3 million of German Trade Tax net operating losses that are carried forward indefinitely. Additionally, the Company has $8.6 million of other foreign net operating losses that are expected to expire at various times beginning in 2022. The Company also has U.S. tax credits of approximately $18.8 million available to offset future tax liabilities that expire at various dates, which include research and development tax credits of $11.6 million expiring at various times through 2033 and foreign tax credits of $7.2 million expiring at various times through 2023. Utilization of the U.S. net operating loss carryforwards and credits may be subject to annual limitations due to the ownership percentage change limitations provided by the Internal Revenue Code Section 382 and similar state provisions. In the event of a deemed change in control under Internal Revenue Code Section 382, an annual limitation on the utilization of net operating losses and credits may result in the expiration of all or a portion of the net operating loss and credit carryforwards. The Company reflects certain foreign statutory reserves in its tabular reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits. Effective for the year ended December 31, 2013, these tax benefits are presented as a reduction of the associated net deferred tax assets. The Company has indefinitely reinvested the earnings of its subsidiaries in the cumulative amount of approximately $1,054.0 million as of December 31, 2013, and therefore, has not provided for U.S. income taxes that could result from the distribution of such earnings to the U.S. parent. If these earnings were ultimately distributed to the U.S. in the form of dividends or otherwise, or if the shares of the subsidiaries were sold or transferred, the Company would likely be subject to additional U.S. income taxes, net of the impact of any available foreign tax credits. It is not practicable to estimate the amount of unrecognized deferred U.S. income taxes on these undistributed earnings. The Company has gross unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest, of approximately $32.7 million as of December 31, 2013, of which $14.1 million, if recognized, would reduce the Company’s effective tax rate. In the next twelve months it is reasonably possible that the Company will reduce its unrecognized tax benefits by $1-3 million due to statutes of limitations expiring and favorably settling with taxing authorities which would reduce the Company’s effective tax rate. A tabular reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in millions): Gross unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross increases—tax positions in prior periods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross decreases—tax positions in prior periods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross increases—current period tax positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross decreases—current period tax positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $27.0 5.5 (0.6) 3.1 (0.4) Gross unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross increases—tax positions in prior periods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross decreases—tax positions in prior periods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross increases—current period tax positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Settlements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lapse of statutes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross decreases—tax positions in prior periods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross increases—current period tax positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Settlements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lapse of statutes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34.6 5.9 (2.2) 12.0 (4.6) (3.6) 42.1 (0.5) 0.7 (7.1) (2.5) Gross unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $32.7 98 The Company’s policy is to include accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits and income tax liabilities, when applicable, in income tax expense. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company had approximately $3.8 million and $3.7 million, respectively, of accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions included in other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. Penalties and interest related to unrecognized tax benefits of $0.9 million and $2.0 million were recorded in the provision for income taxes during the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company files tax returns in the U.S., which include federal, state and local jurisdictions and many foreign jurisdictions with varying statutes of limitations. The Company considers Germany, the U.S. and Switzerland to be its significant tax jurisdictions. The tax years 2009 to 2012 are open tax years in these significant foreign jurisdictions. In the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company settled tax audits in Switzerland and Germany. In the first quarter of 2014, the Company settled a tax audit in the U.S. for the tax year 2010. The settlement was immaterial to the consolidated financial statements. Tax years 2011 to 2012 remain open for examination in the U.S. Note 13—Employee Benefit Plans Defined Benefit Plans Substantially all of the Company’s employees in Switzerland, France and Japan, as well as certain employees in Germany, are covered by Company-sponsored defined benefit pension plans. Retirement benefits are generally earned based on years of service and compensation during active employment. Eligibility is generally determined in accordance with local statutory requirements, however, the level of benefits and terms of vesting varies among plans. Net Periodic Pension Cost The components of net periodic benefit costs for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 were as follows: Components of net periodic benefit costs: Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expected return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5.5 4.1 (3.8) 2.2 $ 4.6 4.8 (4.0) 1.1 $ 5.5 4.9 (4.1) 1.3 Net periodic benefit costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 8.0 $ 6.5 $ 7.6 2013 2012 2011 The Company measures its benefit obligation and the fair value of plan assets as of December 31st each year. The changes in benefit obligations and plan assets under the defined benefit 99 pension plans, projected benefit obligation and funded status of the plans were as follows at December 31, (in millions): 2013 2012 Change in benefit obligation: Benefit obligation at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Plan participant contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Plan curtailments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Actuarial loss (gain) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Impact of foreign currency exchange rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $185.5 5.5 4.1 3.7 (0.5) (6.6) (13.1) 4.5 $153.5 4.6 4.8 3.4 — (5.0) 20.4 3.8 Benefit obligation at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183.1 185.5 Change in plan assets: Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Plan participant and employer contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Impact of foreign currency exchange rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123.9 10.8 8.9 (6.6) 4.0 112.9 4.4 8.7 (5.0) 2.9 Fair value of plan assets at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141.0 123.9 Net funded status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (42.1) $ (61.6) The accumulated benefit obligation for the defined benefit pension plans is $174.8 million and $176.5 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. All defined benefit pension plans have an accumulated benefit obligation and projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets at December 31, 2013 and 2012. The following amounts were recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets for the Company’s defined benefit plans at December 31, (in millions): Current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (1.6) $ (1.6) (60.0) (40.5) Net benefit obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(42.1) $(61.6) 2013 2012 The following pre-tax amounts were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income for the Company’s defined benefit plans at December 31, (in millions): Reconciliation of amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets: Net actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(20.3) $(41.1) Accumulated other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accumulated contributions in excess of net periodic benefit cost (20.3) (21.8) (41.1) (20.5) Net amount recognized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(42.1) $(61.6) 2013 2012 The amount in accumulated other comprehensive income at December 31, 2013 expected to be recognized as amortization of net loss within net periodic benefit cost in 2014 is $0.1 million. 100 The range of assumptions used for defined benefit pension plans reflects the different economic environments within the various countries. The range of assumptions used to determine the projected benefit obligations for the years ended December 31, are as follows: Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expected return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . Expected rate of compensation increase . . . . 0.7%-3.8% 0.8%-4.1% 1.1%-5.5% 3.0% 3.4%-4.0% 1.0%-3.0% 1.0%-3.8% 1.0%-3.8% 3.5% 2013 2012 2011 To determine the expected long-term rate of return on pension plan assets, the Company considers current asset allocations, as well as historical and expected returns on various asset categories of plan assets. For the principal pension plans, the Company applies the expected rate of return to a market- related value of assets, which stabilizes variability in assets to which the expected return is applied. Asset Allocations by Asset Category The fair value of the Company’s pension plan assets at December 31, 2013 and 2012, by asset category and by level in the fair value hierarchy, is as follows (in millions): Quoted Prices in Active Markets Available (Level 1) Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Total $ 19.4 $ 19.4 $ — $— 1.4 51.1 8.3 60.8 35.1 5.3 40.4 14.4 — — — — — — — — — 6.0 $6.0 — — — — — — — — — $— December 31, 2013 Plan Assets: Cash and cash equivalents (a) . . . . . . . . Debt securities: U.S. Corporate (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign corporations (c) . . . . . . . . . . Foreign governments (c) . . . . . . . . . . Equity Securities: Foreign corporations (d) . . . . . . . . . . U.S. corporations (d) . . . . . . . . . . . . Real estate (e) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mortgage and other asset-backed 1.4 51.1 8.3 60.8 35.1 5.3 40.4 14.4 securities (f) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.0 Total plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $141.0 $135.0 101 Quoted Prices in Active Markets Available (Level 1) Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Total $ 12.1 $ 12.1 $ — $— December 31, 2012 Plan Assets: Cash and cash equivalents (a) . . . . . . . . Debt securities: U.S. Corporate (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign corporations (c) . . . . . . . . . . Foreign governments (c) . . . . . . . . . . Equity Securities: Foreign corporations (d) . . . . . . . . . . U.S. corporations (d) . . . . . . . . . . . . Real estate (e) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mortgage and other asset-backed 1.3 43.3 7.5 52.1 31.4 6.4 37.8 15.0 securities (f) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.9 Total plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $123.9 $117.0 1.3 43.3 7.5 52.1 31.4 6.4 37.8 15.0 — — — — — — — — — 6.9 $6.9 — — — — — — — — — $— (a) Cash and cash equivalents consist primarily of highly liquid investments, including cash on hand. (b) Our U.S. Corporate bond investments had an average rating of AA. (c) Our Foreign Corporate and Government bond investments had an average rating of AA. (d) U.S. and International equites primarily include investments in large market capitalization stocks. (e) Real estate includes Swiss public real estate funds which generate returns in line with the Swiss property market by investing in residential and commerical properties throughout Switzerland. (f) Mortgage and other asset-backed securities pool together various cash-flow producing financial assets typically collateralized by residential mortgages, commercial mortgages and other assets. A Board of Trustees comprised of employer and employee representatives of the subsidiaries are responsible for setting the policy that serves as the framework for allocating plan assets within the guidelines provided by the respective government. The policy defines an investment strategy, including the asset allocation ranges, which is designed to ensure that the benefit obligations of the plans can be met when they are due. The investment strategy also is targeted at optimizing the return on investment within the risk constraints of the plans. The Board of Trustees appoint the plan administrators and investment managers, who oversee the investment allocation process, setting long-term strategic targets and monitoring asset allocations. The target allocations are 55% bonds, including cash, 30% equity investments and 15% real estate and mortgages. Target allocation ranges are guidelines, not limitations, and occasionally the Board of Trustees will approve allocations above or below a target range based on a number of factors, including market conditions. 102 Contributions and Estimated Future Benefit Payments During 2014, the Company expects contributions to be consistent with 2013. The estimated future benefit payments are based on the same assumptions used to measure the Company’s benefit obligation at December 31, 2013. The following benefit payments reflect future employee service as appropriate (in millions): 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2019-2023 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3.8 4.0 4.6 4.8 5.3 34.0 Other Benefit Plans The Company sponsors various defined contribution plans that cover certain domestic and international employees. The Company may make contributions to these plans at its discretion. The Company contributed $5.3 million, $4.6 million and $3.7 million to such plans in the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Note 14—Commitments and Contingencies Operating Leases Certain buildings, office equipment and vehicles are leased under agreements that are accounted for as operating leases. Total rental expense under operating leases was $24.6 million, $21.6 million and $18.5 million during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases at December 31, 2013, for each of the next five years are as follows (in millions): 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $20.7 17.0 13.2 10.4 8.7 17.7 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $87.7 Capital Leases The Company leases certain buildings under agreements that are classified as capital leases. The cost of the buildings under the capital leases is included in the consolidated balance sheets as property, plant and equipment and was $8.8 million and $9.9 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012. Accumulated amortization of the leased buildings at December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $2.8 million and $3.0 million, respectively. Amortization expense related to assets under capital leases is included in depreciation expense. The obligations related to capital leases are recorded as a component of long-term debt or the current portion of long-term debt in the consolidated balance sheets, depending on when the lease payments are due. 103 License Agreements The Company has entered into cross-licensing agreements for various technologies that allow other companies to utilize certain of its patents and related technologies over various periods or into perpetuity. Income from these agreements for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $9.5 million, $20.2 million and $2.9 million, respectively, and is classified in other revenue in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. The decrease in the year ended December 31, 2013 is driven by an incremental decline in license revenue from the sale of technology by BEST. The unearned portions of proceeds from the cross-licensing agreements are classified as short-term or long-term deferred revenue depending on when the revenue will be earned. The Company has also entered into license agreements allowing it to utilize certain patents. If these patents are used in connection with a commercial product sale, the Company pays royalties on the related product revenues. Licensing fees for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, were $4.0 million, $4.2 million and $2.8 million, respectively, and are recorded in cost of product revenue in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. Legal On April 9, 2013, PerkinElmer, Inc., Caliper Life Sciences, Inc., Xenogen Corporation and the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University filed an action in the U.S. District Court, California Northern District (Oakland) against the Company and, as subsequently amended, the Company’s Bruker BioSpin Corporation subsidiary, alleging breach of a certain agreement assumed by Bruker BioSpin Corporation in connection with its purchase of the X-ray and optical imaging systems business of Carestream Health, Inc. in October 2012. The suit also claimed that the Company and Bruker BioSpin Corporation engaged in conduct that infringed and/or induced infringement of certain patents held by or licensed to the plaintiffs. Subsequent to the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with the plaintiffs to resolve all claims. The settlement amount was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2013 and was immaterial to the consolidated financial statements of the Company. On September 21, 2012, Vertical Analytics LLC filed an action in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware against Bruker AXS Inc. (‘‘Bruker AXS’’). The complaint alleged that Bruker AXS infringed, induced infringement, or contributed to the infringement of certain U.S. patents related to X-ray diffraction analysis held by Vertical Analytics LLC. During the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with Vertical Analytics LLC to resolve all claims. The settlement amount was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2013 and was immaterial to the consolidated financial statements of the Company. On November 4, 2011, Hyphenated Systems, LLC filed an action in California Superior Court, Santa Clara County, against the Company and Veeco Metrology, Inc. in connection with certain agreements entered into prior and subsequent to the Company’s acquisition of all of the shares of Veeco Metrology, Inc. in October 2010. Upon the closing of the acquisition, Veeco Metrology, Inc. was renamed Bruker Nano, Inc. During the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with Hyphenated Systems, LLC to resolve all claims. The settlement amount was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2013 and was immaterial to the consolidated financial statements of the Company. Other lawsuits, claims and proceedings of a nature considered normal to its businesses may be pending from time to time against the Company. The Company believes the outcome of these proceedings, individually and in the aggregate, if any, will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, no accruals have been recorded for such other potential contingencies. 104 Internal Investigation and Compliance Matters As previously reported, the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors, assisted by independent outside counsel and an independent forensic consulting firm, conducted an internal investigation in response to anonymous communications received by the Company alleging improper conduct in connection with the China operations of the Company’s Bruker Optics subsidiary. The Audit Committee’s investigation, which began in 2011 and was completed in the first quarter of 2012, included a review of compliance by Bruker Optics and its employees in China and Hong Kong with the requirements of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (‘‘FCPA’’) and other applicable laws and regulations. The investigation found evidence indicating that payments were made that improperly benefited employees or agents of government-owned enterprises in China and Hong Kong. The investigation also found evidence that certain employees of Bruker Optics in China and Hong Kong failed to comply with the Company’s policies and standards of conduct. As a result, the Company took personnel actions, including the termination of certain individuals. The Company also terminated its business relationships with certain third party agents, implemented an enhanced FCPA compliance program, and strengthened the financial controls and oversight at its subsidiaries operating in China and Hong Kong. During 2011, the Company also initiated a review of the China operations of its other subsidiaries, with the assistance of an independent audit firm. On the basis of the review conducted to date, the Company has identified additional employees in Bruker subsidiaries operating in China who failed to comply with the Company’s policies and standards of conduct, and has taken additional personnel actions at certain of its subsidiaries as a result. The review is ongoing and no conclusions can be drawn at this time as to its final outcome. The Company voluntarily contacted the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and the United States Department of Justice in August 2011 to advise both agencies of the internal investigation by the Audit Committee regarding the China operations of the Company’s Bruker Optics subsidiary. In October 2011, the Company also reported that existence of the internal investigation to the Hong Kong Joint Financial Intelligence Unit and Independent Commission Against Corruption (‘‘ICAC’’). The Company has cooperated with the United States federal agencies and Hong Kong government authorities with respect to their inquiries and has provided documents and/or made witnesses available in response to requests from the governmental authorities reviewing this matter. The Company intends to continue to cooperate with these agencies in connection with their inquiries. At this time the Company cannot reasonably assess the timing or outcome of these matters or their effect, if any, on the Company’s business. The FCPA and related statutes and regulations provide for potential monetary penalties as well as criminal and civil sanctions in connection with FCPA violations. It is possible that monetary penalties and other sanctions could be assessed by the U.S. Federal government in connection with these matters. Additionally, to the extent any payments are determined to be illegal by local government authorities, civil or criminal penalties may be assessed by such authorities and the Company’s ability to conduct business in that jurisdiction may be negatively impacted. At this time, the Company cannot predict the extent to which the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’), the Department of Justice (‘‘DOJ’’), the ICAC or any other governmental authorities will pursue administrative, civil injunctive or criminal proceedings, the imposition of fines or penalties or other remedies or sanctions. Given the current status of the inquiries from these agencies, the Company cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of possible loss that may result from any proceedings that may be commenced by the SEC, the DOJ, the ICAC or any other governmental authorities. Accordingly, no provision with respect to such matters has been recorded in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Any adverse findings or other negative outcomes from any such proceedings could have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements in future periods. 105 Letters of Credit and Guarantees At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company had bank guarantees of $171.2 million and $143.2 million, respectively, related primarily to customer advances. These arrangements guarantee the refund of advance payments received from customers in the event that the merchandise is not delivered or warranty obligations are not fulfilled in compliance with the terms of the contract. These guarantees affect the availability of the Company’s lines of credit. Indemnifications The Company enters into standard indemnification arrangements in the Company’s ordinary course of business. Pursuant to these arrangements, the Company indemnifies, holds harmless, and agrees to reimburse the indemnified parties for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party, generally the Company’s business partners or customers, in connection with any patent, or any copyright or other intellectual property infringement claim by any third party with respect to its products. The term of these indemnification agreements is generally perpetual anytime after the execution of the agreement. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these agreements is unlimited. The Company believes the estimated fair value of these agreements is minimal. The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with its directors and officers that may require the Company to: indemnify its directors and officers against liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as directors or officers, other than liabilities arising from willful misconduct of a culpable nature; advance their expenses incurred as a result of any proceeding against them as to which they could be indemnified; and obtain directors’ and officers’ insurance if available on reasonable terms, which the Company currently has in place. Note 15—Shareholders’ Equity Dividends The terms of some of the Company’s indebtedness currently restrict the Company’s ability to pay dividends to its shareholders. Stock Plans Bruker Corporation Stock Plan In February 2010, the Bruker BioSciences Corporation Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Option Plan, or the 2000 Plan, expired at the end of its scheduled ten-year term. On March 9, 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors unanimously approved and adopted the Bruker Corporation 2010 Incentive Compensation Plan, or the 2010 Plan, and on May 14, 2010, the 2010 Plan was approved by the Company’s stockholders. The 2010 Plan provides for the issuance of up to 8,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Plan allows a committee of the Board of Directors (the ‘‘Committee’’) to grant incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options and restricted stock awards. The Committee has the authority to determine which employees will receive the awards, the amount of the awards and other terms and conditions of the award. Awards granted by the Committee typically vest over a period of three to five years. 106 Stock option activity for the year ended December 31, 2013 was as follows: Weighted Average Remaining Weighted Shares Subject to Contractual Average Options Option Price Term (Yrs) Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in millions) (b) Outstanding at December 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,888,137 Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,078,311 (871,991) Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (216,893) Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $11.11 19.19 9.66 12.03 Outstanding at December 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,877,564 $13.12 Vested at December 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,827,102 $10.66 Vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2013 (a) . . 4,734,032 $13.01 6.3 4.7 6.3 $32.8 $25.8 $32.3 (a) In addition to the options that are vested at December 31, 2013, the Company expects a portion of the unvested options to vest in the future. Options expected to vest in the future are determined by applying an estimated forfeiture rate to the options that are unvested as of December 31, 2013. (b) The aggregate intrinsic value is based on the positive difference between the fair value of the Company’s common stock price of $19.77 on December 31, 2013, or the date of exercises, as appropriate, and the exercise price of the underlying stock options. Unrecognized pre-tax stock-based compensation expense of $16.0 million related to stock options awarded under the 2000 and 2010 Plans is expected to be recognized over the weighted average remaining service period of 2.7 years for stock options outstanding at December 31, 2013. Restricted shares of the Company’s common stock are periodically awarded to executive officers, directors and certain key employees of the Company, subject to service restrictions, which expire ratably over periods of three to five years. The restricted shares of common stock may not be sold or transferred during the restriction period. Stock-based compensation for restricted stock is recorded based on the stock price on the grant date and charged to expense ratably throughout the restriction period. The following table summarizes information about restricted stock activity during the year ended December 31, 2013: Outstanding at December 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shares Subject to Restriction 341,622 121,072 (93,646) (11,100) Outstanding at December 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 357,948 Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value $15.16 19.10 15.13 10.25 $16.65 Unrecognized pre-tax stock-based compensation expense of $5.0 million related to restricted stock awarded under the 2010 Plan is expected to be recognized over the weighted average remaining service period of 3.2 years for awards outstanding at December 31, 2013. During the year ended December 31, 2013, 2012, 2011, the total fair value of shares vested from restricted shares of the Company’s stock amounted to $1.4 million, $1.2 million and $3.1 million, respectively. 107 Bruker Energy & Supercon Technologies Stock Plan In October 2009, the Board of Directors of BEST adopted the Bruker Energy & Supercon Technologies, Inc. 2009 Stock Option Plan (the ‘‘BEST Plan’’). The BEST Plan provides for the issuance of up to 1,600,000 shares of BEST common stock in connection with awards under the BEST Plan. The BEST Plan allows the BEST Board of Directors to grant incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options and restricted stock awards. The BEST Board of Directors has the authority to determine which employees will receive the awards, the amount of the awards and other terms and conditions of any awards. Awards granted pursuant to the BEST Plan vest over a period of three to five years. The BEST Plan had 520,000 and 800,000 options outstanding as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The activity in the BEST Plan for the year ended December 31, 2013 represented forfeited options totaling 280,000 options. The Company recorded approximately $0.3 million and $0.5 million in 2013 and 2012, respectively, of pre-tax stock-based compensation expense related to awards granted under the BEST Plan. Unrecognized pre-tax stock-based compensation expense of $0.2 million related to stock options awarded under the BEST Plan is expected to be recognized over the weighted average remaining service period of 0.8 years for awards outstanding at December 31, 2013. Note 16—Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income The following is a summary of the components of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, at December 31, (in millions): Foreign Currency Translation Unrealized Losses on Derivatives Pension Liability Adjustment Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Balance at December 31, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Realized loss on reclassification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $175.8 (14.7) — Balance at December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . Realized loss on reclassification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance at December 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Realized loss on reclassification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161.1 9.2 — 170.3 27.3 — $(3.0) (0.3) 2.2 (1.1) (0.2) 1.3 — — — $(20.4) 1.6 1.3 (17.5) (16.1) 1.1 (32.5) 15.0 2.3 $152.4 (13.4) 3.5 142.5 (7.1) 2.4 137.8 42.3 2.3 Balance at December 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $197.6 $ — $(15.2) $182.4 Note 17—Deferred Offering Costs In September 2010, the Company announced plans to sell a minority ownership position in its BEST subsidiary through an initial public offering of the capital stock of BEST. As a result of economic and market factors, the timing of the BEST initial public offering was uncertain and the Company expensed deferred offering costs totaling $3.4 million in 2011. In March 2012, the Company determined not to proceed with the initial public offering of the capital stock of BEST. 108 Note 18—Other Charges, Net The components of other charges, net for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, were as follows (in millions): Acquisition-related charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transition-related charges incurred in connection with acquired businesses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Professional fees incurred in connection with internal investigation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Factory relocation charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other charges, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2013 2012 2011 $ 3.6 $ (0.1) $1.2 — — 3.0 6.1 0.7 18.2 — 11.1 4.3 2.0 — 1.0 0.5 0.2 0.4 $28.6 $13.9 $9.7 Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2012 and continuing in 2013, the Company commenced productivity improvement initiatives in both its BSI and BEST reporting segments in an effort to better optimize its operations. These restructuring initiatives include the divestiture of certain non-core businesses, outsourcing of various manufacturing activities, transferring or ceasing operations at certain facilities and an overall right-sizing within the Company based on the current business environments. The Company recorded restructuring charges within the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 of $25.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively, related to these initiatives. For the year ended December 31, 2013, restructuring charges consisted of $17.9 million for severance costs, $5.3 million for exit related costs, such as professional services and facility exit charges, and $2.1 million of inventory provisions for excess inventory. Of the $25.3 million recorded during the year ended December 31, 2013, $23.0 million related to the BSI reporting segment and $2.3 million related to the BEST reporting segment. The Company recorded $18.2 million of the restructuring charges as a component of Other Charges, net, and $7.1 million as a component of Cost of Revenue in the condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. Based on the current status of these restructuring initiatives, the Company expects to record additional charges of approximately $4-5 million during 2014 relating to these initiatives, consisting mainly of severance costs. The following table sets forth the changes in the restructuring reserves for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 (in millions): Total Severance Exit Costs Provisions for Excess Inventory Balance at December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-cash adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance at December 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-cash adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign currency impact . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1.3 0.5 (0.4) (0.2) 1.2 25.3 (15.4) (0.1) 0.5 $ 0.9 0.2 (0.2) — 0.9 17.9 (10.9) — 0.5 $ 0.1 0.3 (0.1) — 0.3 5.3 (4.5) — — $ 0.3 — (0.1) (0.2) — 2.1 — (0.1) — Balance at December 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 11.5 $ 8.4 $ 1.1 $ 2.0 109 Note 19—Interest and Other Income (Expense), Net The components of interest and other income (expense), net for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, were as follows (in millions): 2013 2012 2011 Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exchange losses on foreign currency transactions . . . . . . . . Gain on disposal of product line . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1.0 (13.4) (10.4) 0.9 (1.7) $ 0.9 (14.3) (6.8) 2.2 0.3 $ 1.0 (7.3) (4.4) — 0.6 Interest and other income (expense), net . . . . . . . . . . . . $(23.6) $(17.7) $(10.1) Note 20—Business Segment Information The Company has two reporting segments, BSI and BEST, as discussed in Footnote 1 to the consolidated financial statements. Selected business segment information is presented below for the years ended December 31, (in millions): 2013 2012 2011 Revenue: BSI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BEST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Eliminations (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,709.5 147.4 (17.5) $1,666.1 136.2 (10.9) $1,554.1 113.4 (15.8) Total revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,839.4 $1,791.4 $1,651.7 Operating Income (Loss): BSI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BEST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Corporate, eliminations and other (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 138.9 9.5 (0.2) $ 140.8 12.8 2.4 $ 162.8 (4.1) (3.1) Total operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 148.2 $ 156.0 $ 155.6 (a) Represents product and service revenue between reportable segments. (b) Represents corporate costs and eliminations not allocated to the reportable segments. The Company recorded an impairment of assets within the BSI segment of $22.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, comprising goodwill and definite-lived intangible asset impairment charges of $1.4 million and $16.4 million, respectively, in our CAM division as a result of increased deterioration in its financial performance, and an impairment charge of $4.8 million of other long-lived assets to reduce the carrying value to their estimated fair value. The Company recorded an impairment of assets of $1.2 million within the BEST segment for the year ended December 31, 2012 to reduce the carrying value of certain tangible long-lived assets to their estimated fair value. 110 Total assets by segment as of and for the years ended December 31, are as follows (in millions): Assets: BSI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BEST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Eliminations and other (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,925.3 146.5 (83.5) $1,786.2 134.4 (64.2) Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,988.3 $1,856.4 2013 2012 (a) Assets not allocated to the reportable segments and eliminations of intercompany transactions. Total capital expenditures and depreciation and amortization by segment are presented below for the years ended December 31, (in millions): 2013 2012 2011 Capital Expenditures: BSI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BEST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $44.9 5.4 $60.1 12.7 $52.3 9.3 Total capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $50.3 $72.8 $61.6 Depreciation and Amortization: BSI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BEST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $56.4 4.9 $54.6 4.5 $49.1 3.8 Total depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $61.3 $59.1 $52.9 Revenue and property, plant and equipment by geographical area as of and for the year ended December 31, are as follows (in millions): Revenue: United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Germany . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rest of Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Asia Pacific . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 359.7 188.9 583.7 529.1 178.0 $ 377.2 174.8 531.3 525.7 182.4 $ 309.2 195.3 490.2 503.6 153.4 Total revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,839.4 $1,791.4 $1,651.7 2013 2012 2011 Property, plant and equipment: United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Germany . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rest of Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Asia Pacific . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2013 2012 $ 53.8 175.0 62.7 5.8 2.2 $ 53.7 155.3 63.5 6.0 5.1 Total property, plant and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $299.5 $283.6 111 Note 21—Related Parties The Company leases certain office space from certain of its principal shareholders, including a director and executive officer and another member of the Company’s Board of Directors, and members of their immediate families, which have expiration dates ranging from 2015 to 2021. Total rent expense under these leases was $2.6 million, $2.4 million and $2.4 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Company incurred expenses of $5.3 million, $2.4 million and $3.2 million, respectively, to a law firm in which one of the members of its Board of Directors is a partner. During the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Company incurred expenses of $0.2 million, $0.4 million and $0.5 million, respectively, to a financial services firm in which one of the members of its Board of Directors is a partner. Note 22—Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) A summary of operating results for the quarterly periods in the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, is set forth below (in millions, except per share data): March 31 June 30 September 30 December 31 (1) Quarter Ended Year ended December 31, 2013 Net revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income attributable to Bruker Corporation . . . . . . Net income per common share attributable to Bruker Corporation shareholders: Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Year ended December 31, 2012 Net revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income attributable to Bruker Corporation . . . . . . Net income per common share attributable to Bruker Corporation shareholders: Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $393.4 174.5 12.2 5.4 $454.9 201.6 43.5 22.9 $439.0 193.2 31.5 16.6 $ 0.03 $ 0.03 $ 0.14 $ 0.14 $ 0.10 $ 0.10 $405.6 189.9 34.4 15.1 $420.7 187.7 22.1 9.9 $447.8 210.1 60.3 39.7 $ 0.09 $ 0.09 $ 0.06 $ 0.06 $ 0.24 $ 0.24 $552.1 235.9 61.0 35.2 $ 0.21 $ 0.21 $517.3 241.7 39.2 12.8 $ 0.08 $ 0.08 (1) The fourth quarter of 2012 includes an impairment of assets of $23.8 million, comprising goodwill, definite-lived intangible assets and other long-lived assets. 112 ITEM 9 CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON AUDITING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE None. ITEM 9A CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES Disclosure Controls and Procedures We have established disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that material information relating to us, including our consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to our Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) by others within our organization. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2013. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2013 to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this evaluation, our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2013. The attestation report issued by Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, on our internal control over financial reporting is included herein. Changes in Control over Financial Reporting There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2013 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. 113 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Bruker Corporation We have audited Bruker Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework) (the COSO criteria). Bruker Corporation’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. In our opinion, Bruker Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on the COSO criteria. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Bruker Corporation as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013 of Bruker Corporation and our report dated February 27, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. Boston, Massachusetts February 27, 2014 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP 114 ITEM 9B OTHER INFORMATION None. 115 PART III ITEM 10 DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE The full text of the Company’s code of ethics, which applies to its Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, Controller and Board of Directors is published on the Company’s Investor Relations web site at www.bruker.com. We intend to disclose future amendments to certain provisions of our Code, or waivers of such provisions granted to executive officers and directors, on the web site within four business days following the date of such amendment or waiver. Information regarding our executive officers may be found under the caption ‘‘Executive Officers’’ in our definitive proxy statement for our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Information regarding our directors, including committees of our Board of Directors and our Audit Committee Financial Experts, may be found under the captions ‘‘Proposal No. 1—Election of Directors,’’ ‘‘Board Meetings, Committees and Compensation,’’ and ‘‘Audit Committee Report’’ in our definitive proxy statement for our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Information regarding compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act may be found in our definitive proxy statement for our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the caption ‘‘Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.’’ Information regarding the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to our Board of Directors may be found in our definitive proxy statement for our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the caption ‘‘Director Nominations.’’ Such information is incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 11 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION Information regarding executive compensation may be found under the captions ‘‘Compensation of Directors,’’ ‘‘Compensation Discussion and Analysis,’’ ‘‘Summary of Executive Compensation,’’ ‘‘Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,’’ and ‘‘Compensation Committee Report’’ in our definitive proxy statement for our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Such information is incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 12 SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS The following table summarizes information about our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2013: Period Equity compensation plans approved by security holders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights Warrants and Rights Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) 5,235,512 N/A 5,235,512 $13.36 N/A $13.36 4,735,124 N/A 4,735,124 The Bruker Corporation 2010 Incentive Compensation Plan, or the 2010 Plan, was approved by our stockholders in May 2010. The 2010 Plan has a term of ten years and provides for the issuance of up to 8,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. 116 The information contained in our definitive proxy statement for our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the caption ‘‘Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management’’ is incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 13 CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE The information contained in our definitive proxy statement for our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the captions ‘‘Related Persons Transactions’’ and ‘‘Board Meetings, Committees and Compensation’’ is incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 14 PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES The information contained in our definitive proxy statement for our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the captions ‘‘Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’’ and ‘‘Proposal No. 2— Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’’ is incorporated herein by reference. 117 ITEM 15 EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES PART IV (a) Financial Statements and Schedules (1) Financial Statements The following consolidated financial statements of Bruker Corporation are filed as part of this report under Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data: Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (2) Financial Statement Schedules All schedules have been omitted because they are not required or because the required information is provided in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes thereto set forth under Item 8 above. (3) Exhibits (b) List of Exhibits Exhibit No. 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 Description Stock Purchase Agreement, dated April 17, 2006, by and among Bruker BioSciences Corporation, Bruker Optics Inc. and the stockholders of Bruker Optics Inc. U.S. Stock Purchase Agreement, dated December 2, 2007, by and among the Registrant, Bruker BioSpin Inc. and the stockholders of Bruker BioSpin Inc. German Share Purchase Agreement, dated December 2, 2007, by and among the Registrant, Bruker Physik GmbH, Techneon AG and the shareholders of Bruker Physik GmbH Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of December 2, 2007 by and among the Registrant, Bruker BioSpin Invest AG, Bruker BioSpin Beteiligungs AG and the shareholders of Bruker BioSpin Invest AG Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of March 9, 2010 between Agilent Technologies Inc. and Bruker Corporation 118 Filed Herewith Incorporated by Reference (1) Form 8-K Date April 18, 2006 8-K December 3, 2007 8-K December 3, 2007 8-K December 3, 2007 10-Q/A March 31, 2010 Exhibit No. 2.6 3.1 3.2 4.1 10.1† 10.2† 10.3† Description Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of August 15, 2010 among Veeco Instruments Inc., Veeco Metrology Inc. and Bruker Corporation Amended Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant Bylaws of the Registrant Specimen stock certificate representing shares of common stock of the Registrant Bruker Corporation 2010 Incentive Compensation Plan Bruker Corporation 2010 Incentive Compensation Plan Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement Bruker Corporation 2010 Incentive Compensation Plan Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement Filed Herewith Incorporated by Reference (1) Form 8-K Date October 7, 2010 10-K December 31, 2007 S-1 S-3 S-8 August 3, 2000 April 22, 2004 June 4, 2010 10-Q June 30, 2010 10-Q June 30, 2010 10.4† Bruker Corporation 2010 Incentive Compensation Plan Form of Restricted Stock Agreement 10-Q June 30, 2010 10.11* Contract dated October 1, 1998 between Bruker S-1 December 31, 2001 AXS GmbH and GKSS Forschungszentrum Geesthacht GmbH, as amended 10.12* Contract dated July 31, 1997 between Bruker S-1 December 31, 2001 S-1 December 31, 2001 8-K May 25, 2011 AXS GmbH and Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Berlin und Munchen Bereich Medizinische Technik 10.19* Agreement on Development, Supply and Marketing dated August 2, 2001 between Bruker AXS GmbH and Siemens Medical Solutions Rontgenwerk Rudolstadt 10.30 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of May 24, 2011 among the Company, Bruker AXS GmbH, Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Bruker Optik GmbH, Bruker Physik GmbH, Bruker BioSpin Invest AG, Bruker BioSpin AG and Bruker BioSpin International AG, the other foreign subsidiary borrowers from time to time party thereto, the lenders from time to time party thereto, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Commerzbank Ag, New York, Grand Cayman And Stuttgart Branches and RBS Citizens, National Association, as Co-Documentation Agents, Bank of America, N.A. as Syndication Agent and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent 10.31* Note Purchase Agreement dated as of January 18, 8-K January 18, 2012 2012. 119 Exhibit No. Description 10.34† Bruker Energy & Supercon Technologies, Inc. 2009 Stock Option Plan Filed Herewith Incorporated by Reference (1) Form 10-K Date December 31, 2009 10.35† Form of Bruker Energy & Supercon 10-K December 31, 2009 Technologies, Inc. Incentive Stock Option Agreement 10.36† Form of Bruker Energy & Supercon 10-K December 31, 2009 Technologies, Inc. Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement 10.40† Letter agreement dated June 5, 2012 between Bruker Corporation and Charles F. Wagner, Jr 10-Q June 30, 2012 10.41† Employment offer letter agreement dated June 25, 10-Q March 31, 2013 2012 between Bruker Corporation and Juergen Srega 10.42† Amended employment agreement dated December 3, 2013 between Bruker Corporation and Thomas Bachmann 21.1 23.1 24.1 31.1 31.2 32.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Power of attorney (included on signature page hereto) Certification by Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Certification by Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Certification by Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 X X X X X X X 120 Incorporated by Reference (1) Form Date Filed Herewith X Exhibit No. 101 Description The following materials from the Bruker Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (iv) Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements * Certain portions have been omitted pursuant to an order granting confidential treatment and have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. † Designates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. (1) In accordance with Rule 12b-32 under the Exchange Act reference is made to the documents previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which documents are hereby incorporated by reference. The dates listed for Forms 8-K are dates the respective forms were filed on, the dates listed for Forms 10-Q, Forms 10-K and Forms 10-K/A are for the quarterly or annual period ended dates and the dates listed for Forms S-1, Forms S-3 and Forms S-4 are dates on which the Securities and Exchange Commission declared them effective. 121 Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. SIGNATURES BRUKER CORPORATION By: /s/ FRANK H. LAUKIEN, PH.D. Name: Frank H. Laukien, Ph.D. Title: President, Chief Executive Officer and Date: February 27, 2014 Chairman We, the undersigned officers and directors of Bruker Corporation, hereby severally constitute and appoint Frank H. Laukien, Ph.D. to sign for us and in our names in the capacities indicated below, the report on Form 10-K filed herewith and any and all amendments to such report, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, in each case, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and generally to do all such things in our names and on our behalf in our capacities consistent with the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and all requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. Name Title Date /s/ FRANK H. LAUKIEN, PH.D. Frank H. Laukien, Ph.D. President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman (Principal Executive Officer) February 27, 2014 /s/ CHARLES F. WAGNER, JR. Charles F. Wagner, Jr. Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) February 27, 2014 /s/ MICHAEL G. KNELL Michael G. Knell Vice President of Finance and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) February 27, 2014 /s/ WOLF-DIETER EMMERICH, PH.D. Wolf-Dieter Emmerich, Ph.D. Director February 27, 2014 /s/ STEPHEN W. FESIK, PH.D. Stephen W. Fesik, Ph.D. /s/ BRENDA J. FURLONG Brenda J. Furlong Director February 27, 2014 Director February 27, 2014 122 Name Title Date /s/ GILLES G. MARTIN Gilles G. Martin /s/ CHRIS VAN INGEN Chris van Ingen Director February 27, 2014 Director February 27, 2014 /s/ MARC A. KASTNER, PH.D. Marc A. Kastner, Ph.D. Director February 27, 2014 /s/ RICHARD D. KNISS Richard D. Kniss /s/ JOERG C. LAUKIEN Joerg C. Laukien /s/ WILLIAM A. LINTON William A. Linton /s/ RICHARD A. PACKER Richard A. Packer /s/ RICHARD M. STEIN Richard M. Stein /s/ BERNHARD WANGLER Bernhard Wangler Director February 27, 2014 Director February 27, 2014 Director February 27, 2014 Director February 27, 2014 Director February 27, 2014 Director February 27, 2014 123 SUBSIDIARIES OF BRUKER CORPORATION EXHIBIT 21.1 Name of Subsidiary Jurisdiction of Incorporation South Africa India Sweden Singapore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware, U.S.A. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware, U.S.A. Bruker Energy & Supercon Technologies, Inc. Bruker HTS GmbH (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Germany Bruker Advanced Supercon GmbH (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Germany Bruker EAS GmbH (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Germany Hydrostatic Extrusions Ltd. (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . United Kingdom RI Research Instruments GmbH (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Germany Bruker AXS Inc. Bruker AXS GmbH (4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Germany Bruker Austria GmbH (5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Austria Bruker AXS Analytical Instruments Pvt. Ltd. (5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bruker AXS Nordic AB (5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bruker AXS Pte. Ltd. (5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bruker AXS SAS (5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . France Bruker Baltic OU (5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Estonia Bruker do Brasil Ltda. (5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Brazil Bruker Elemental GmbH (5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Germany Bruker Nano GmbH (6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Germany Bruker Mexicana S.A. de C.V. (5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mexico Bruker Polska Sp. Z o.o. (5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Poland Bruker South Africa (Pty) Ltd. (5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . InCoaTec GmbH (7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Germany Bruker AXS Handheld Inc. (8) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware, U.S.A. Bruker AXS K.K. (8) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bruker Nano, Inc. (8) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Arizona, U.S.A Bruker BioSciences Securities Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Massachusetts, U.S.A. Bruker BioSpin Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Massachusetts, U.S.A. Bruker Invest AG (9) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bruker BioSpin AG (10) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bruker Espanola S.A. (10) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bruker BioSpin International AG (10) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bruker (Beijing) Technologies & Services Co., Ltd. (11) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . China Bruker (Malaysia) SDN BHD (11) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Malaysia Bruker BioSpin Pte. Ltd. (11) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bruker (Beijing) Scientific Technology Co., Ltd. (12) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . China Bruker Ltd. (11) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Russia India Bruker India Scientific PVT, Ltd. (11) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . India Bruker India Suppliers PVT, Ltd. (13) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bruker BioSpin K.K. (10) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Japan Bruker BioSpin Korea Co. Ltd. (10) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Korea Bruker BioSpin MRI GmbH (10) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Germany Bruker BioSpin MRI Inc. (10) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Massachusetts, U.S.A. Bruker BioSpin MRI Ltd. (10) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . United Kingdom Bruker BioSpin Scandinavia AB (10) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bruker Nederland B.V. (10) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Netherlands Bruker Ltd. (10) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Canada Bruker UK Ltd. (10) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . United Kingdom Bruker AXS Ltd. (14) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . United Kingdom Oxford Research Systems Ltd. (15) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . United Kingdom Bruker PTY Ltd. (10) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Australia Switzerland Switzerland Spain Switzerland Singapore Sweden Japan Name of Subsidiary Jurisdiction of Incorporation Italy Israel India South Korea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware, U.S.A. Bruker BioSpin S.A. (10) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . France Bruker Belgium S.A./N.V. (10) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Belgium Bruker Italia S.r.l. (10) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bruker Portugal Unipessoal LDA (10) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Portugal Bruker Scientific Instruments Hong Kong Co., Ltd. (10) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Hong Kong Bruker MicroCT N.V. (10) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Belgium Bruker Turkey Teknolojik Sistemler Ticaret Ltd. Sirketi (10) . . . . . . . . . . . . . Turkey Bruker Scientific Israel Ltd. (10) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bruker Physik GmbH (16) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Germany Bruker BioSpin GmbH (17) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Germany Perch Solutions OY (18) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Finland Bruker Daltonics Inc. Bruker Daltonik GmbH (19) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Germany Bruker s.r.o. (20) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Czech Republic Bruker Daltonics India Pvt. Ltd. (20) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bruker BioSciences Korea Co., Ltd. (21) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bruker Taiwan Co. Ltd. (21) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Taiwan Japan Bruker Daltonics K.K. (21) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Singapore Bruker Daltonics Pte. Ltd. (21) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . South Africa Bruker Daltonics Pty. Ltd. (21) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sweden Bruker Daltonics Scandinavia AB (21) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bruker Chemical Analysis B.V. (21) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Netherlands Bruker BioSciences Pty. Ltd. (22) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Australia Bruker Daltonics GmbH (21) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bruker Daltonics Ltd. (21) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . United Kingdom Bruker Daltonics S.r.l. (21) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bruker Daltonique S.A. (21) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . France Bruker Panama S. de R.L. (23) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Panama Bruker Detection Corporation (21) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Massachusetts, U.S.A. Bruker Optics Inc. Bruker Optics K.K. (24) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bruker Optics Korea Co., Ltd. (25) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bruker Optics GmbH (24) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RPD Tool AG (26) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bruker Optics Ltd. (24) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Canada Bruker Optics Ltd. (24) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . United Kingdom Bruker Optik GmbH (24) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Germany Bruker Instruments Ltd. (27) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . China Bruker Optics AB (27) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sweden Bruker Optics Ukraine (27) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ukraine Bruker Optics B.V. (27) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Netherlands Bruker HK Limited (27) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Hong Kong Bruker Optics Taiwan Ltd. (28) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Taiwan Bruker Optik Southeast Asia Pte. Ltd. (28) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bruker Optique SA (27) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . France Bruker Finance B.V. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Netherlands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware, U.S.A. Japan South Korea Switzerland Switzerland Switzerland Singapore Italy (1) These entities are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Bruker Energy & Supercon Technologies, Inc. (2) These entities are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Bruker HTS GmbH. (3) RI Research Instruments GmbH is an indirect subsidiary of Bruker Energy & Supercon Technologies, Inc. RI Research Instruments GmbH is 51% owned by Bruker Energy & Supercon Technologies, Inc. (4) Bruker AXS GmbH is 90% owned by Bruker AXS Inc. and 10% owned by Bruker Corporation. (5) These entities are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Bruker AXS GmbH. (6) Bruker Nano GmbH is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bruker Elemental GmbH. (7) InCoaTec GmbH is an indirect subsidiary of Bruker AXS GmbH. InCoaTec GmbH is owned 66% by Bruker AXS GmbH. (8) These entities are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Bruker AXS Inc. (9) Bruker Invest AG is 90% owned by Bruker BioSpin Corporation and 10% owned by Bruker Corporation. (10) These entities are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Bruker Invest AG. (11) These entities are wholly-owned subsidiaries are Bruker BioSpin International AG. (12) Bruker (Beijing) Scientific Technology Co., Ltd. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bruker BioSpin Pte. Ltd. (13) Bruker India Suppliers PVT, Ltd. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bruker India Scientific PVT, Ltd. (14) Bruker AXS Ltd. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bruker UK Ltd. (15) Oxford Research Systems, Ltd. is 50% owned by Bruker Invest AG and 50% owned by Bruker UK Ltd. (16) Bruker Physik GmbH is 50.5% owned by Bruker BioSpin Corporation, 24.75% owned by Bruker Daltonik GmbH and 24.75% owned by Bruker Optik GmbH. (17) Bruker BioSpin GmbH is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bruker Physik GmbH. (18) Perch Solution OY is an indirect subsidiary of Bruker BioSpin GmbH. Perch Solution OY GmbH is 51% owned by Bruker BioSpin GmbH. (19) Bruker Daltonik GmbH is 90% owned by Bruker Daltonics Inc. and 10% owned by Bruker Corporation. (20) These entities are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Bruker Daltonik GmbH. (21) These entities are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Bruker Daltonics Inc. (22) Bruker BioSciences Pty. Ltd. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bruker Chemical Analysis B.V. (23) Bruker Panama S. de R.L. is 99.99% owned by Bruker Daltonics Inc. and 0.01% owned by Bruker Corporation. (24) These entities are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Bruker Optics Inc. (25) Bruker Optics Korea Co., Ltd. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bruker Optics K.K. (26) RPD Tool AG is an indirect subsidiary of Bruker Optics GmbH. RPD Tool AG is owned 19% by Bruker Optics GmbH. (27) These entities are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Bruker Optik GmbH. (28) These entities are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Bruker HK Limited. EXHIBIT 23.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements: (1) Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-167333) pertaining to the Bruker Corporation 2010 Incentive Compensation Plan, (2) Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-159982) and related Prospectus of Bruker Corporation for the registration of 70,000,000 shares of its common stock, and (3) Registration Statements (Form S-8, Nos. 333-150430, 333-137090, 333-107294, and 333-47836) pertaining to the Bruker BioSciences Corporation Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Option Plan; of our reports dated February 27, 2014, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Bruker Corporation and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Bruker Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Bruker Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2013. Boston, Massachusetts February 27, 2014 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP EXHIBIT 31.1 I, Frank H. Laukien, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Bruker Corporation; CERTIFICATION 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. b. c. d. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. b. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. Date: February 27, 2014 By: /s/ FRANK H. LAUKIEN, PH.D. Frank H. Laukien, Ph.D. President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman (Principal Executive Officer) EXHIBIT 31.2 I, Charles F. Wagner, Jr., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Bruker Corporation; CERTIFICATION 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. b. c. d. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. b. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. Date: February 27, 2014 By: /s/ CHARLES F. WAGNER, JR. Charles F. Wagner, Jr. Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Bruker Corporation (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), each of the undersigned, Frank H. Laukien, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, and Charles F. Wagner Jr., Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: February 27, 2014 By: /s/ FRANK H. LAUKIEN, PH.D. Frank H. Laukien, Ph.D. President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman (Principal Executive Officer) Date: February 27, 2014 By: /s/ CHARLES F. WAGNER, JR. Charles F. Wagner, Jr. Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) Reconciliation of consolidated GAAP results of Bruker Corporation and Non-GAAP financial measures for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited) (in millions, except per share amounts) Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Operating Income, Non-GAAP Profit Before Tax, Non-GAAP Net Income, and Non-GAAP EPS GAAP Operating Income Non-GAAP Adjustments: Restructuring Costs Acquisition-Related Costs Purchased Intangible Amortization Other Costs(a) Total Non-GAAP Adjustments: Non-GAAP Operating Income Non-GAAP Operating Margin Non-GAAP Interest & Other Income (Expense), net Non-GAAP Profit Before Tax Non-GAAP Income Tax Provision Non-GAAP Tax Rate Minority Interest Non-GAAP Net Income Attributable to Bruker Weighted Average Shares Outstanding (Diluted) Non-GAAP Earnings Per Share Reconciliation of GAAP and Non-GAAP Gross Profit GAAP Gross Profit Non-GAAP Adjustments: Restructuring Costs Acquisition-Related Costs Purchased Intangible Amortization Other Costs Total Non-GAAP Adjustments: Non-GAAP Gross Profit Non-GAAP Gross Margin Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2013 $148.2 25.3 4.5 20.7 6.8 $57.3 $205.5 11.2% (26.0) 179.5 (48.5) 27.0% (1.7) 129.3 168.5 $0.77 2012 $156.0 0.9 3.1 22.0 37.0 $63.0 $219.0 12.2% (19.9) 199.1 (60.1) 30.2% (0.7) 138.3 167.4 $0.83 $805.2 $829.4 7.1 0.9 19.3 - 27.3 $832.5 45.3% - 3.2 18.6 0.1 21.9 $851.3 47.5% Reconciliation of GAAP and Non-GAAP Interest & Other Income (Expense), net GAAP Interest & Other Income (Expense), net $(23.6) $(17.7) Non-GAAP Adjustments: Insurance Settlement Sale of Product Line Total Non-GAAP Adjustments: (1.5) (0.9) (2.4) - (2.2) (2.2) Non-GAAP Interest & Other Income (Expense), net $(26.0) $(19.9) Non-GAAP Return on Invested Capital(b) 20.0% (a) Other costs for 2012 includes an impairment of assets of $23.8 million, comprising of goodwill, definite-lived intangible assets and other long-lived assets. (b) Non-GAAP Return on Invested Capital for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 is calculated as net operating profit after tax (NOPAT) divided by total capital. NOPAT is defined as Non-GAAP operating income, net of tax applying the Non-GAAP tax rate. Total capital is based on the average of the December 31, 2013 and 2012 balances, and is defined as the sum of total long-term debt and total shareholders’ equity, less cash and cash equivalents. THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK BlankIntentionally.indd 1 4/7/14 6:35 PM THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK BlankIntentionally.indd 1 4/7/14 6:35 PM 40639cvr.indd 2-4 Executive Management Board of Directors Frank H. Laukien, Ph.D. President & Chief Executive Officer Frank H. Laukien, Ph.D. Chairman Charles F. Wagner, Jr. Executive Vice President & CFO Thomas Bachmann President, Bruker BioSpin Group Mark R. Munch, Ph.D. President, Bruker MAT Group Juergen Srega President, Bruker CALID Group Wolf-Dieter Emmerich, Ph.D. Former Member of the Executive Board, Netzsch Group Stephen W. Fesik, Ph.D. Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine Corporate & Investor Information Corporate Headquarters: Bruker Corporation 40 Manning Road Billerica, Massachusetts 01821 Common Stock Listing: Common stock of Bruker Corporation is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “BRKR” Brenda J. Furlong Former Managing Director, Columbia Management Group Vice President, Investor Relations: Joshua Young joshua.young@bruker.com Chris van Ingen Former President of Life Sciences Group, Agilent Technologies, Inc. Secretary: Richard M. Stein Gilles J. Martin, Ph.D. Chairman & Chief Executive Officer Eurofins Scientific Group Richard D. Kniss Former Senior Vice President, Agilent Technologies, Inc. Joerg C. Laukien Executive Chairman, Bruker BioSpin Group William A. Linton, Ph.D. Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, Promega Corporation Legal Counsel: Nixon Peabody LLP 100 Summer Street Boston, Massachusetts 02110 Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm: Ernst & Young LLP 200 Clarendon Street Boston, Massachusetts 02116 Transfer Agent: American Stock Transfer & Trust Company 59 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038 Richard A. Packer Chief Executive Officer, ZOLL Medical Corporation Richard M. Stein Partner, Nixon Peabody LLP Bernhard Wangler Partner, Kanzlei Wangler Bruker Corporation info@bruker.com www.bruker.com 4/7/14 6:20 PM