Quarterlytics / Technology / Semiconductors / Cabot Microelectronics Corporation

Cabot Microelectronics Corporation

ccmp · NASDAQ Technology
Claim this profile
Ticker ccmp
Exchange NASDAQ
Sector Technology
Industry Semiconductors
Employees 1001-5000
← All annual reports
FY2003 Annual Report · Cabot Microelectronics Corporation
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
THE GLOBAL LEADER IN CMP TECHNOLOGY

A n n u a l   R e p o r t   2 0 0 3

Financial Highlights

Cabot Microelectronics: delivering solid financial 
performance through a sustained industry downturn.

’99

’00

’01

’02

’03

$98.7

$181.2

$227.2

$235.2

$251.7

REVENUE
(in millions)

’99

’00

’01

’02

’03

$19.1

$46.8

$62.4

$60.0

$56.1

’99

’00

’01

’02

’03

$0.65

$1.39

$1.72

$1.66

$1.53

OPERATING INCOME
(in millions)

EARNINGS PER SHARE

(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

SELECTED STATEMENT OF INCOME DATA:

Revenue
Gross profit
Operating income
Net income
Diluted net income per share
Shares used in computing diluted net income per share

SELECTED BALANCE SHEET DATA:

Total assets
Net property, plant and equipment
Stockholders’ equity

2003

2002

Increase
(Decrease)

$251,665
127,396
56,094
37,733
1.53
24,665

$

$235,165
122,098
59,960
40,685
1.66
24,565

$

$315,617
133,695
271,773

$258,385
132,264
213,506

7%
4%
(6%)
(7%)
(8%)
0%

22%
1%
27%

When  we  are  asked  to  define  Cabot  Microelectronics,  we  often  describe  what we  do—

develop, manufacture and supply high-performance polishing slurries and pads for chemical

mechanical  planarization  (CMP),  an  enabling  step  in  the  manufacturing  process  of  the

world’s most advanced integrated circuit (IC) devices and data storage components.

But,  like  any  successful  organization,  defining Cabot  Microelectronics  requires  much  more

than just describing our business activities. Indeed, we think that we are best defined by our

many distinctive strengths—our global leadership position in CMP slurries; our technological

D E F I N I N G   C A B O T   M I C R O E L E C T R O N I C S

expertise  and  capability  that  help  our  customers  improve  their  performance  and  extend

their  technologies,  thereby  enabling  the  growth  of  our  industry;  our  performance-driven

partnerships  with  major  customers  around  the  world;  and  our  commitment  to  striving  for

flawless execution in all aspects of our operations.

These  are  the  attributes  that  truly  define  Cabot  Microelectronics,  setting  us  apart  in  our

industry and solidly positioning our Company to excel.

Chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) is a polishing process used to manufacture advanced integrated

circuit  (IC)  devices  and  data  storage  components.  Through  CMP,  specialized  chemical  formulations

called slurries are applied to the surfaces of these devices, yielding a planar, low defect finish. CMP

enables  IC  manufacturers  to  produce  compact,  multi-layer,  high-performance  ICs  and  data  storage

components, while realizing higher manufacturing yields and lower production costs.

To Our Shareholders, Customers and Employees:

As  I  rejoin  Cabot  Microelectronics,  I  am  both  excited  and
energized by the opportunity to lead this successful, best-in-class
organization at what I believe is a pivotal point in its growth
story.  Over  the  past  decade,  Cabot  Microelectronics  has
become  the  global  leader  in  CMP  slurries,  and  as  we  have
evolved,  we  have  helped  shape  our  industry.  Our  numerous
technological breakthroughs have significantly advanced CMP
technology and our commitment to working closely with our
customers  has  helped  make  CMP  broadly  understood  and
employed by every major IC manufacturer in the world. As a
result, today’s CMP technology is far ahead of where it was a
few years ago.

Our strong position presents our Company with a number of
compelling  business  opportunities,  which  we  are  working  to
leverage by driving improvement across our entire organization.
We  are  developing  our  technologies  and  products  so  that  we
can advance our leadership position in CMP and transfer our
expertise in fine finish polishing to other promising businesses.
We are continuing to enhance our relationships with customers
so that we can collaborate more closely with them to identify
and  address  their  next-generation  needs.  We  are  improving
and expanding our infrastructure so that we can stay ahead of
fast-paced  industry  changes  and  capture  opportunities  in  the
rapidly growing Asian market. We are developing our people,
processes and systems so that we can continue to set the industry
standard for quality and service. We are accomplishing all this
while  maintaining  our  long-held  cost  management  discipline
that has enabled us to deliver solid financial results on a consis-
tent basis even through the sustained industry downturn of the
last several years. All of these initiatives are fundamental to our
Company’s  overriding  goal—to  generate  increasing  value  for
our shareholders.

As we enter fiscal 2004, Cabot Microelectronics is successfully
pursuing all of these improvement paths. In so doing, we are
capitalizing  on  the  strong  market  opportunity  that  the  CMP
consumables  business  continues  to  offer.  This  opportunity  is
driven by a number of factors. First, CMP creates value for our
customers.  Since  CMP  enables  IC  manufacturers  to  improve
their  leading-edge  chip  production,  increase  their  yields  and
decrease  their  production  costs,  CMP  usage  has  grown  even
through the industry downturn. Second, CMP is necessary to
produce the most advanced ICs, the volume of which is grow-
ing  as  manufacturers  increase  their  efforts  to  develop  smaller,
more powerful ICs. Third, the number of CMP process steps is
increasing. The most sophisticated ICs include intricate circuitry
that  requires  more  CMP  process  steps  to  be  performed  on
each wafer than are needed for older technology. This, in turn,
requires  the  use  of  more  CMP  materials.  Finally,  we  believe
that the fine finish polishing competency that we have devel-
oped  for  the  CMP  process  has  applications  outside  of  the  IC
industry. Our Company is already pursuing these opportunities, 

such  as  in  the  data  storage  marketplace,  and  we  continue  to
explore other businesses in which our expertise can add value.

Forging Ahead

Cabot  Microelectronics  became  independent  in  fiscal  2000
shortly before the IC industry began its prolonged downturn.
Since then, under the guidance of former President and Chief
Executive Officer, Dr. Matthew Neville, we have successfully
met  the  challenges  presented  by  the  downturn,  and  we  have
progressed.  We  have  extended  our  geographic  reach,  devel-
oped  our  global  infrastructure,  advanced  our  technological
capabilities,  expanded  our  product  line  and  generated  sound
financial results. In short, our Company has not only demon-
strated our ability to perform well under pressure, but has also
established  a  solid  platform  to  excel  as  market  conditions
appear to improve.

Today,  Cabot  Microelectronics  is  a  unique  company:  We  are
the world leader in the development, manufacture and supply
of high-performance CMP polishing slurries for IC applications,
and  the  only  publicly  traded  “pure-play”  CMP  technology
provider in the industry. We are a technological pioneer, with
the finest team of scientists and the most extensive R&D pro-
gram in our field, as well as a track record for adding value to
our customers’ manufacturing processes. We serve a large and
demanding  customer  base,  which  includes  virtually  every
major  IC  manufacturer  in  the  world.  We  uphold  stringent
quality standards that have earned us a reputation for superior
execution.  We  operate  according  to  high  standards  of  ethics
and  corporate  governance.  We  have  a  healthy  balance  sheet
that gives us the f lexibility to pursue promising market oppor-
tunities as they emerge. Above all, we have a world-class team
of  employees  whose  capabilities,  diligence,  loyalty,  integrity
and passion have greatly impressed me and given me tremen-
dous confidence in our Company’s future.

Moving  forward,  through  fiscal  2004  and  beyond,  we  will
draw on these strengths to continue our momentum. We will
apply  our  technological  expertise  to  develop  leading-edge
products for our customers and to pursue new business areas.
We will leverage our global infrastructure to forge closer cus-
tomer relationships and to capitalize on opportunities in Asia.
And we will improve our operations so that we can continue
to set the industry quality standard. In all of these efforts, we
will seek to return increased value to you—our shareholders,
customers and employees.

William P. Noglows
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

We are the global leader in the development of 
leading-edge CMP slurries for IC manufacturers, and 
are the only publicly traded “pure-play” company 
in the industry. 

T R A C K I N G   T H E   T R A N S I T I O N

Cabot Microelectronics was formed in 1990, when a team of experts at Cabot Corporation began to work

with a major IC device manufacturer in the development of materials for CMP, a new fine finish polishing

technology that was applied during the manufacturing process of ICs to improve their performance and

yields. Among the primary founders of the new business unit were two veterans of the specialty chemical

industry, Dr. Matthew Neville and Mr. William Noglows. Dr. Neville took charge of the fledgling business,

and  under  his  direction,  Cabot  Microelectronics  flourished.  In  2000,  the  unit  spun-off  from  Cabot

Corporation, becoming a completely independent organization with Dr. Neville at its helm. Mr. Noglows

served as a member of the Cabot Microelectronics Board of Directors until March 2002, helping to guide

the  young  Company’s  progress.  In  November  2003,  Dr.  Neville  resigned  as  Chairman,  President 

and  Chief  Executive  Officer  of  Cabot  Microelectronics.  The  Company’s  Board  of  Directors  appointed

Mr. Noglows to these roles.

We are the CMP industry’s R&D pioneer, 
with the most resources channeled to 
the advancement of CMP science.

5

Cabot Microelectronics is well known for its commitment to
developing and extending CMP technology through intensive
R&D  efforts,  regardless  of  marketplace  conditions.  Over  the
years,  this  dedication  has  enabled  us  to  advance  our  under-
standing  of  CMP  science,  to  build  substantial  technological
capabilities, and to assemble a team of the most highly skilled
scientists  and  applications  experts  in  the  industry.  As  a  result,
today Cabot Microelectronics is the clear leader in the devel-
opment  of  CMP  slurries  for  advanced  IC  devices,  with  the
broadest product selection and the most robust R&D program
of any company in our industry.

As the IC industry continues to evolve, our R&D expertise is
becoming  increasingly  important.  Consumers  are  demanding
smaller electronic products with more functionality and greater
speed.  These  shifts  are  prompting  IC  manufacturers  to  pro-
duce  smaller  and  more  complex  IC  devices,  thus  requiring
more  CMP  steps  used  in  each  production  process,  new  and
more precisely engineered CMP materials, and new manufac-
turing techniques. These trends are driving greater customiza-
tion and specialization in our products, enabled by our broad
and deep R&D expertise.

These  trends  are  also  creating  growth  opportunities,  which
Cabot Microelectronics is well positioned to leverage. In fiscal
2003, we collaborated with our customers to do just that. One
of  our  most  important  accomplishments  was  the  launch  of
SiLECT(cid:2) products,  a  groundbreaking  new  product  line  for

direct  shallow  trench  isolation  (STI)  applications.  Direct  STI
electrically  isolates  adjoining  transistors  on  an  IC  device.  Our
direct STI slurry reduces the number of manufacturing steps for
our customers compared to traditional STI and provides signifi-
cant value to our customers. We also continued to strengthen our
copper business, battling the growing competition in this arena
by building on the well-established position of our iCue(cid:3) prod-
ucts. Copper technology in IC production has presented our cus-
tomers  with  significant  technical  challenges,  but  we  have  been
successful in introducing value-added solutions.

While  new  and  emerging  IC  technologies  like  copper  are
changing the face of the industry, the “classic” technologies of
tungsten  and  glass  oxide  are  still  used  extensively  around  the
globe. What’s more, we expect that both of these technologies
will  continue  to  be  important  within  the  CMP  arena.  With
this in mind, we are actively working to improve our existing
product  offerings  for  these  applications  and  to  develop  new,
higher performing products.

We also took steps to strengthen our data storage business and
significantly  expand  our  commitment  to  this  business.  When
we  entered  data  storage  polishing  in  1999,  we  did  so  by
launching  a  high-performance  product  for  use  in  the  second
polishing  step  of  the  two  steps  that  compose  the  data  storage
polishing  process.  In  fiscal  2003,  we  not  only  improved  this
product, but we also launched an exciting new technology for
the first step of the polishing process.

We are a strong partner who cultivates 
performance-driven customer relationships with virtually
every major IC manufacturer in the world.

Just  as  today’s  more  sophisticated  technology  makes  our  cus-
tomers’ business more exacting, rigorous and complex, it also
creates new demands for Cabot Microelectronics. As a result,
our customers need us to be more than just a supplier of CMP
products.  They  need  us  to  be  a  partner  who  can  work  with
them to improve their performance, facilitate their introduction
of next generation products, and be at the forefront of technical
advances within the industry. We are sharply focused on being
that  partner,  and  in  fiscal  2003,  we  took  steps  to  develop
closer, more direct relationships with our clients; to streamline
their  qualification  processes;  to  improve  their  yields;  and  to
eliminate unnecessary manufacturing steps.

Our focus on developing greater intimacy with our customers
was at the heart of these initiatives. We laid the groundwork for
this  in  fiscal  2002  when  we  announced  that  we  would  sell
directly  to  our  customers  and  cease  use  of  a  distributor  in
Europe,  Singapore  and  Malaysia.  In  fiscal  2003,  we  executed
this shift seamlessly, building more direct and personal relation-
ships with our customers in these regions, and positioning us
to partner  with them  more  closely  than ever before. We also
expanded our global sales and marketing force, adding teams in
China, Japan and Taiwan that are enabling us to enhance our
service  to  our  customers.  This  strategy  has  already  translated

into added value, as our employee teams have helped a number
of  our  customers  expedite  their  development  processes  and
realize manufacturing efficiencies.

7

We are also adding value for our customers by helping them to
achieve greater precision in broader aspects of IC manufacturing.
We have spent the past several years working to develop a line
of  custom-engineered  polishing  pads,  optimized  with  our
slurry  formulations.  In  fiscal  2003,  we  realized  an  important
step  in  this  objective,  marketing  a  high-performance  pad  in
collaboration with a third party. Bearing the Epic(cid:3) name, this
pad  has  already  produced  improved  results  for  a  number  of
customers.  We  also  entered  into  a  technology  licensing  and 
co-marketing arrangement with another third party that provides
us  access  to  innovative  “window”  technology  for  polishing
pads, which is essential in a growing number of leading edge
CMP applications. Under this arrangement we are developing,
manufacturing and selling “window” pads enabling us to pro-
vide  technically  optimized  pads  for  use  on  a  specific  toolset.
We  are  continuing  our  internal  efforts  to  develop  other  pad
technologies, with a goal of developing a complete portfolio
of  pads  that  work  optimally  with  each  of  our  unique  slurry
formulations to deliver better performance for our customers.

We are a unified, quality-focused organization intent 
on achieving superior execution in our operations.

The  IC  industry  has  one  of  the  most  stringent  performance
requirements  of  any  business  in  the  world.  Our  customers
work  tirelessly  to  develop  IC  devices  that  are  smaller,  more
powerful and less expensive to produce than their predecessors.
The  only  way  that  they  can  succeed  is  to  have  exceptionally
precise and consistent manufacturing processes.

We  respond  to  these  requirements  by  driving  continuous
improvement in every facet of our operations—from product
development  to  manufacturing  to  logistics  to  support.  This
effort  demands  that  we  design  our  products  with  an  eye  on
their  ability  to  be  manufactured  precisely  and  consistently.  It
also requires that we work closely with our raw materials sup-
pliers  to  assure  tight  control  of  their  processes.  We  achieve
superior manufacturing by utilizing statistical tools that help to
eliminate  variation  and  give  us  control  over  each  step  of  the
manufacturing  process.  We  also  use  technological  tools  that
enable  us  to  prevent  problems  before  they  occur.  Finally,  we
maintain  a  keen  focus  on  the  future  so  that  we  can  respond
rapidly to new customer needs.

In fiscal 2003, we increased all of these efforts, and we continued
to strengthen our Total Quality Management (TQM) program.
Under  this  program,  we  are  taking  steps  to  analyze,  upgrade
and standardize processes within our Company so that we can
maintain appropriate quality control as we continue to expand.
As  part  of  this  initiative,  we  have  implemented  professional
training  tools  to  develop  our  employees  and  to  ensure  that
they are able to represent Cabot Microelectronics as a seamless,
quality-driven, service-oriented organization to our customers,
suppliers and partners around the world. We are also continuing
to develop our business systems, leveraging the new integrated
business  platform  we  put  in  place  in  the  last  fiscal  year  to
increase efficiencies and assure global consistency of our products
and services.

We believe that these investments give Cabot Microelectronics a
unique  competitive  advantage.  Moreover,  we  are  confident
that they are essential to positioning our Company to leverage
the many exciting opportunities in our industry, as well as to
continue  to  be  the  supplier  of  choice  for  the  world’s  top  IC
device manufacturers.

F I N A N C I A L   I N F O R M AT I O N

Selected Financial Data

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Report of Independent Auditors

Consolidated Statements of Income

Consolidated Balance Sheets

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Selected Quarterly Operating Results

Management Responsibility

Market for Company’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

Certifications Previously Filed with the SEC

Corporate Information

10

11

19

19

20

21

22

23

33

34

35

36

38

S E L E C T E D   F I N A N C I A L   D ATA — F I V E   Y E A R   S U M M A RY

(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

Consolidated Statement of Income Data:

Revenue
Cost of goods sold

Gross profit
Operating expenses:

Research and development
Selling and marketing
General and administrative
Litigation settlement
Amortization of intangibles

Total operating expenses

Operating income
Other income (expense), net

Income before income taxes
Provision for income taxes

Net income

Basic earnings per share

Weighted average basic shares outstanding

Diluted earnings per share

Weighted average diluted shares outstanding

Cash dividends per share

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:

Current assets
Property, plant and equipment, net
Other assets

Total assets

Current liabilities
Long-term debt
Other long-term liabilities

Total liabilities
Stockholders’ equity

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

Year Ended September 30,

$251,665
124,269

127,396

$235,165
113,067

122,098

$227,192
108,419

118,773

$181,156
86,290

94,866

41,516
11,221
18,225
—
340

71,302

56,094
(27)

56,067
18,334

33,668
9,667
17,458
1,000
345

62,138

59,960
763

60,723
20,038

25,805
8,757
21,054
—
718

56,334

62,439
1,049

63,488
21,586

19,762
7,594
19,974
—
718

48,048

46,818
130

46,948
16,446

$ 37,733

$ 40,685

$ 41,902

$ 30,502

$

$

$

1.55

24,401

1.53

24,665

0.00

$

$

$

1.68

24,160

1.66

24,565

0.00

$

$

$

1.76

23,824

1.72

24,327

0.00

$

$

$

1.44

21,214

1.39

21,888

3.71

$98,690
48,087

50,603

14,768
4,932
11,107
—
720

31,527

19,076
—

19,076
6,796

$12,280

$ 0.65

18,990

$ 0.65

18,990

$ 0.00

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

As of September 30,

$179,112
133,695
2,810

$315,617

$ 28,916
—
14,928

43,844
271,773

$123,283
132,264
2,838

$258,385

$ 30,571
3,500
10,808

44,879
213,506

$ 96,454
97,426
2,801

$196,681

$ 26,366
3,500
528

30,394
166,287

$ 59,053
71,873
5,180

$136,106

$ 24,200
3,500
844

28,544
107,562

$26,120
40,031
4,123

$70,274

$ 7,775
—
422

8,197
62,077

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$315,617

$258,385

$196,681

$136,106

$70,274

Certain amounts in the prior fiscal years have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation.

M A N A G E M E N T ’ S   D I S C U S S I O N   A N D   A N A LY S I S   O F   F I N A N C I A L   C O N D I T I O N   A N D   R E S U LT S   O F   O P E R AT I O N S

This  Annual  Report,  including  the  following  “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations” includes “forward-looking statements” within the
meaning  of  the  Private  Securities  Litigation  Reform  Act  of
1995.  This  Act  provides  a  “safe  harbor”  for  forward-looking
statements  to  encourage  companies  to  provide  prospective
information  about  themselves  so  long  as  they  identify  these
statements as forward-looking and provide meaningful caution-
ary  statements  identifying  important  factors  that  could  cause
actual results to differ from the projected results. All statements
other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking. In
particular, the statements herein regarding industry or general
economic prospects or trends, our future results of operations
or financial position and statements preceded by, followed by
or  that  include  the  words  “intends,”  “estimates,”  “plans,”
“believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “should,” “could,” or similar
expressions, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking
statements ref lect our current expectations and are inherently
uncertain. Our actual results may differ significantly from our
expectations. We assume no obligation to update this forward-
looking  information.  The  section  entitled  “Factors  Affecting
Future Operating Results” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K
describes  some,  but  not  all,  of  the  factors  that  could  cause
these differences.

The  following  discussion  and  analysis  should  be  read  in  con-
junction with our historical financial statements and the notes
to those financial statements, and our filings with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, including our Annual Report on
Form 10-K.

Overview
Cabot Microelectronics Corporation (“Cabot Microelectronics,’’
“the Company,’’ “us,’’ “we,’’ or “our’’) is the leading supplier
of  high-performance  polishing  slurries  used  in  the  manufac-
ture  of  the  most  advanced  integrated  circuit  (“IC’’)  devices
within the semiconductor industry, in a process called chemi-
cal  mechanical  planarization  (“CMP’’).  CMP  is  a  polishing
process used by IC device manufacturers to planarize or f latten
many of the multiple layers of material that are built upon sili-
con wafers, and is a necessary step in the production of advanced
ICs. Planarization is a polishing process that uses CMP slurries
and pads to level, smooth and remove excess material from the
surfaces  of  these  layers.  CMP  slurries  are  liquid  formulations
that facilitate and enhance this polishing process and generally
contain engineered abrasives and proprietary chemicals. CMP
pads  are  typically  f lat  engineered  “disks”  made  of  polymeric
materials that help to distribute and transport the slurry to the
surface of the wafer and distribute it across the wafer.

CMP  enables  IC  device  manufacturers  to  produce  smaller,
faster  and  more  complex  IC  devices  with  fewer  defects.  We
believe CMP will become increasingly important in the future
as  manufacturers  continue  to  shrink  the  size  of  these  devices
and  to  improve  their  performance.  Our  CMP  products  are

used for a number of applications, such as polishing insulating
layers, the tungsten plugs that go through the insulating layers
and  connect  the  multiple  wiring  layers  of  IC  devices,  and 
copper wiring. In addition, we have developed and sell CMP
slurries  for  polishing  certain  components  in  hard  disk  drives,
specifically  rigid  disk  substrates  and  magnetic  heads,  and  we
believe we are one of the leading suppliers in this area. We are
continuing  to  develop  slurries  for  new  applications  such  as
direct  shallow  trench  isolation,  used  to  electrically  isolate
adjoining transistors. In addition, we operate as a value-added
reseller of polishing pads and are developing our own polishing
pads for use in the CMP process.

Prior to our initial public offering in April 2000, we operated
as a division of Cabot Corporation (“Cabot Corporation’’), a
global  chemical  manufacturing  company  based  in  Boston,
Massachusetts.  Following  our  initial  public  offering,  Cabot
Corporation  owned  approximately  80.5  percent  of  Cabot
Microelectronics.  In  September  2000,  Cabot  Corporation
effected the spin-off of Cabot Microelectronics by distributing
0.280473721 shares of our common stock as a dividend on each
outstanding  share  of  Cabot  Corporation  common  stock  out-
standing on September 13, 2000, or an aggregate of 18,989,744
shares of our common stock.

Basis of Presentation
The  following  “Management’s  Discussion  of  Results  of
Operations” contains financial comparisons with prior periods
that  are  affected  by  certain  agreements  entered  into  with
Cabot Corporation during the fiscal year ended September 30,
2002.  The  effects  of  these  agreements  on  the  comparison  of
operating results are disclosed in the discussion that follows.

11

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The  following  “Management’s  Discussion  and  Analysis  of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” as well as dis-
closures  included  elsewhere  in  this  Annual  Report,  are  based
upon  our  audited  consolidated  financial  statements,  which
have  been  prepared  in  accordance  with  accounting  principles
generally  accepted  in  the  United  States.  The  preparation  of
these  financial  statements  requires  us  to  make  estimates  and
judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities,
revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingencies.
On an ongoing basis, we evaluate the estimates used, including
those related to product returns, bad debts, inventory valuation,
impairments  of  tangible  and  intangible  assets,  income  taxes,
warranty  obligations,  other  accruals,  contingencies  and  litiga-
tion.  We  base  our  estimates  on  historical  experience,  current
conditions and on various other assumptions that are believed
to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which
form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values
of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other
sources,  as  well  as  identifying  and  assessing  our  accounting
treatment  with  respect  to  commitments  and  contingencies.

M   D   &   A   (continued)

Actual  results  may  differ  from  these  estimates  under  different
assumptions  or  conditions.  We  believe  the  following  critical
accounting  policies  involve  more  significant  judgments  and
estimates used in the preparation of the consolidated financial
statements.

We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated
losses resulting from the potential inability of our customers to
make required payments. If the financial condition of our cus-
tomers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their
ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.

We  maintain  a  warranty  reserve  which  provides  for  the  esti-
mated cost of product returns based upon historical experience
and  any  known  conditions  or  circumstances.  Our  warranty
obligation is affected primarily by product that does not meet
specifications  and  performance  requirements  and  any  related
costs of addressing such matters.

We value inventory at the lower of cost or market and write
down  the  value  of  inventory  for  estimated  obsolescence  or
unmarketable  inventory.  An  inventory  reserve  is  maintained
based upon a historical percentage of actual inventory written
off and for known conditions and circumstances. Should actual
product  marketability  and  raw  material  fitness  for  use  be
affected  by  conditions  that  are  different  from  those  projected
by  management,  revisions  to  the  estimated  inventory  reserve
may be required. Also, the purchase cost of one of our key raw
materials from one supplier changes significantly based on the
total quantity of in-specification product purchased in a given
fiscal  year.  During  interim  periods  we  determine  inventory
valuation and the amount charged to cost of goods sold for this
raw material from this supplier based on the expected average
cost over the entire fiscal year using our current full year fore-
cast of purchases of this raw material from this supplier.

We  have  entered  into  unconditional  purchase  obligations,
which include noncancelable purchase commitments and take-
or-pay arrangements with suppliers. We review our agreements
and  make  an  assessment  of  the  likelihood  of  a  shortfall  in 
purchases and determine if it is necessary to record a liability.

In  accordance  with  the  provisions  of  Statement  of  Financial
Accounting Standards No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation—Transition and Disclosure” (“SFAS 148”) and
No.  123,  “Accounting  for  Stock-Based  Compensation”
(“SFAS  123”),  we  have  elected  to  account  for  stock-based
compensation plans in accordance with Accounting Principles
Board  Opinion  No.  25,  “Accounting  for  Stock  Issued  to
Employees”  (“APB  25”),  and  related  interpretations.  We  dis-
close the summary of pro forma effects to reported net income
as if we had elected to recognize compensation cost based on
the  fair  value  of  stock-based  awards  to  employees  of  Cabot
Microelectronics as prescribed by SFAS 123.

Results of Operations
The  following  table  sets  forth,  for  the  periods  indicated,  the
percentage of revenue of certain line items included in our his-
torical statements of income:

Revenue
Cost of goods sold

Gross profit
Research and development
Selling and marketing
General and administrative
Litigation settlement
Amortization of intangibles

Operating income
Other income, net

Income before income taxes
Provision for income taxes

Year Ended September 30,

2003

2002

2001

100.0%
49.4

100.0%
48.1

100.0%
47.7

50.6
16.5
4.5
7.2
—
0.1

22.3
—

22.3
7.3

51.9
14.3
4.1
7.4
0.4
0.1

25.5
0.3

25.8
8.5

52.3
11.4
3.9
9.3
—
0.3

27.4
0.5

27.9
9.5

Net income

15.0%

17.3%

18.4%

YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2003 VERSUS 
YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002

REVENUE
Total revenue was $251.7 million in 2003, which represented a
7.0%,  or  $16.5  million,  increase  from  2002.  Of  this  increase,
$9.7  million  was  due  to  a  4.1%  increase  in  volume  and  $6.8
million  was  due  to  increased  weighted  average  selling  prices
driven  by  improved  sales  mix.  Revenue  related  to  copper
products  increased  25%  over  the  prior  year.  Fiscal  2003  rev-
enue  would  have  been  $1.7  million  lower  had  the  Japanese
Yen average exchange rate for the year held constant with the
prior  year  average.  Also,  in  June  2003,  we  began  selling
directly to customers in Europe, Singapore and Malaysia. These
customers  previously  had  been  serviced  through  Metron,  a
third party distributor. During this transition period we discon-
tinued sales to Metron while they drew down their inventory of
our products, which we believe resulted in an adverse revenue
impact of $3.7 million during our third quarter of fiscal 2003.

We  did  not  see  a  significant  improvement  in  demand  driven
by our customers’ end markets in fiscal year 2003, as a lack of
corporate  information  technology  spending  appears  to  have
weighed heavily on the PC and computer-related markets. We
also  experienced  continued  competition  and  pricing  pressure
this  fiscal  year  and  expect  these  factors  to  continue.  As  we
begin our fiscal year 2004, we see some encouraging signs in
the semiconductor industry. Overall semiconductor sales appear
to  be  on  an  upward  trend,  with  growth  in  the  leading  tech-
nologies  even  more  pronounced.  Although  overall  semicon-
ductor  sales  appear  to  be  on  an  upward  trend,  the  continued
uncertainty  in  the  semiconductor  industry  and  the  worldwide
economy make it difficult for us to predict future revenue trends.

COST OF GOODS SOLD
Total  cost  of  goods  sold  was  $124.3  million  in  2003,  which
represented  an  increase  of  9.9%  or  $11.2  million  from  2002.
Of this increase, $4.6 million was due to higher sales volume,
$4.6 million was due to higher average costs per gallon associ-
ated  with  meeting  our  customers’  more  stringent  product
quality  requirements  and  $2.0  million  was  due  to  a  charge
related  to  the  remaining  minimum  purchase  obligation  of  a
raw material supply agreement for a polishing pad technology
that was previously under development but is no longer being
pursued. Our total cost of this supply agreement was $2.9 mil-
lion in fiscal 2003, compared to $0.8 million in the prior fiscal
year.  We  do  not  expect  to  incur  any  additional  costs  with
respect to this agreement.

The increase in cost of goods sold were partially offset by the
absence of the Rippey royalty payments which ended in August
2002,  following  the  expiration  of  a  contingent  payment
arrangement with Rippey resulting from our 1995 acquisition
of selected assets used or created in connection with the devel-
opment and sale of polishing slurries. We had made payments
under  this  agreement  of  2.5%  of  applicable  slurry  revenue
from July 1995 through our last payment in August 2002.

With respect to the key raw materials used to make our prod-
ucts, we expect that the cost of fumed silica we purchase from
Cabot Corporation used in the manufacture of CMP slurries
will continue to increase according to the terms of our existing
fumed metal oxide agreement with Cabot Corporation, which
provides  for  a  fixed  annual  increase  in  the  price  of  silica  of
2.0% of the initial price and additional price adjustments cor-
responding to Cabot Corporation’s raw material cost increases
or decreases. Also, under the fumed alumina supply agreement
with  Cabot  Corporation,  the  overall  price  of  fumed  alumina
f luctuates since it is based on all of Cabot Corporation’s fixed
and  variable  costs  for  producing  the  fumed  alumina,  plus  its
capital  costs  for  expanding  its  capacity,  plus  an  agreed  upon
rate of return on investment, plus incentive payments if more
than a certain amount of fumed alumina per year is produced
that meets our specifications.

Our need for additional quantities of key raw materials in the
future has required and will continue to require that we enter
into  new  supply  arrangements  with  third  parties.  We  may
enter into arrangements in the future that could result in costs
which  are  higher  than  those  in  the  existing  agreements.  We
also expect to continue to invest in our Operations Excellence
initiative  to  improve  our  manufacturing  capabilities  to  meet
our customers’ increasing product performance requirements.

GROSS PROFIT
Our gross profit as a percentage of total revenue was 50.6% in
2003  as  compared  to  51.9%  in  2002.  The  decrease  in  gross
profit  resulted  primarily  from  an  increase  in  manufacturing

costs to support our customers’ increasing quality requirements,
pricing  pressure  from  certain  key  customers  and  our  recogni-
tion of the minimum purchase obligation referred to above. In
the near term, we expect gross profit will be in the 50% range,
plus  or  minus  2%,  as  we  continue  to  add  staffing  and  make
improvements in manufacturing processes.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Total  research  and  development  expenses  were  $41.5  million
in 2003, which represented an increase of 23.3% or $7.8 mil-
lion, from 2002. Research and development expense increased
$1.6 million due to increased staffing, $1.7 million due to higher
wafer  purchases  and  $2.7  million  due  to  depreciation  and
operating costs of our R&D facility and other new equipment.
Since  the  R&D  facility  was  opened  during  the  prior  fiscal
year,  2002  does  not  represent  a  full  year  of  depreciation  and
operating costs related to the facility. An additional $1.0 mil-
lion increase resulted from allocating certain common facility
operating  costs  to  R&D.  These  costs  had  previously  been
treated as general and administrative expense prior to the R&D
facility construction. Additional costs were incurred in techni-
cal service support and other areas to support the overall increase
in  R&D  activities.  R&D  efforts  were  mainly  related  to  new
and  enhanced  CMP  products  including  slurry  products  for
copper applications, new CMP polishing pad technology and
advanced chemistry and particle technology.

SELLING AND MARKETING
Selling  and  marketing  expenses  were  $11.2  million  in  2003,
which represented an increase of 16.1%, or $1.6 million, over
2002. The increase resulted primarily from higher staffing costs
associated  with  our  increased  customer  support  initiatives
including our transition to selling direct to customers in Europe,
Singapore and Malaysia, rather than through a distributor.

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
General  and  administrative  expenses  were  $18.2  million  in
2003, which represented an increase of 4.4%, or $0.8 million,
from  2002.  Increases  include  depreciation  of  our  business
information  systems,  higher  directors  and  officers  liability
insurance premiums of $1.2 million and increased staffing costs
of $0.6 million. These increases were partially offset by a $0.8
million reduction in legal and professional expenses, primarily
due to the absence of legal fees associated with the Rodel liti-
gation, discussed further below, a decrease in facilities charges
due  to  the  change  in  allocation  of  certain  common  facility
operating  costs  described  under  Research  and  Development
and  the  absence  of  a  $0.2  million  noncash  charge  related  to
the modification of a former director’s stock option agreement
in fiscal 2002.

LITIGATION SETTLEMENT
During the second fiscal quarter of 2002, we settled all pend-
ing patent infringement litigation with Rodel, which resulted

13

M   D   &   A   (continued)

in a one-time payment of $1.0 million. Under the settlement
agreement, we received a fully paid-up, worldwide royalty-free
license to all technology that was the subject of the litigation
and their foreign equivalents, and we have no further financial
obligation with respect to this matter.

AMORTIZATION OF INTANGIBLES
Amortization of intangibles was $0.3 million in 2003 and 2002.

OTHER INCOME, NET
Other expense was negligible in 2003 compared to $0.8 mil-
lion of other income in 2002. The decrease in other income in
2003 is due to the absence of foreign exchange gains recorded
in  the  prior  year  resulting  from  the  strengthening  of  the
Japanese Yen, which were partially offset by a payment made
to  Cabot  Corporation  in  2002  as  reimbursement  for  certain
capital  improvements  made  to  equipment  used  to  supply  us
with raw materials, which is no longer in service.

PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
The effective income tax rate was 32.7% in 2003 and 33.0% in
2002.  The  decrease  in  the  effective  tax  rate  was  due  to  an
increase in tax credits from expanded research and experimen-
tation activities.

NET INCOME
Net  income  was  $37.7  million  in  2003,  which  represented  a
decrease of 7.3%, or $3.0 million, from 2002 as a result of the
factors discussed above.

YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002 VERSUS 
YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2001

REVENUE
Total revenue was $235.2 million in 2002, which represented a
3.5%,  or  $8.0  million,  increase  from  2001.  Of  this  increase,
$5.2  million  was  due  to  a  2.3%  increase  in  volume  and  $2.8
million  was  due  to  increased  weighted  average  selling  prices.
Revenue related to copper products increased 115% over the
prior year. Fiscal 2002 revenue would have been $2.0 million
higher had the Japanese Yen average exchange rate for the year
held constant with the prior year average. Total revenue in the
second half of fiscal 2002 increased 32% over the first half of
the year. We believe this was primarily due to higher produc-
tion by our customers as a result of improvement in IC device
inventories,  which  appeared  to  return  to  more  normal  levels
during 2002.

COST OF GOODS SOLD
Total  cost  of  goods  sold  was  $113.1  million  in  2002,  which
represented an increase of 4.3% or $4.6 million from 2001. Of
this increase, $2.5 million was due to higher sales volume and
$2.1 million was due to higher weighted average costs per gallon.
The cost of fumed silica we purchase from Cabot Corporation
increased according to the terms of our existing fumed metal
oxide agreement with Cabot Corporation, which provides for

a fixed annual increase in the price of silica of 2.0% of the initial
price and additional increases based upon an increase in Cabot
Corporation’s  raw  material  costs.  In  order  to  meet  certain  of
our needs for fumed alumina given the anticipated growth in
sales of fumed alumina based slurries, in December 2001, we
entered  into  a  fumed  alumina  supply  agreement  with  Cabot
Corporation  and  an  amendment  to  the  fumed  metal  oxide
agreement with respect to its fumed alumina terms. The terms
of this agreement, along with those contained in the amend-
ment to the fumed metal oxide agreement, were retroactive to
October  2001  and  our  average  cost  per  pound  for  alumina
from  Cabot  Corporation  since  that  time  is  higher  than  paid
previously  under  the  original  fumed  metal  oxide  agreement.
Had we paid this higher average cost per pound for all fumed
alumina  purchased  in  fiscal  2001,  cost  of  goods  sold  in  that
period would have increased by approximately $1.0 million.

During fiscal 2002, certain costs decreased following the final
payment  in  August  2002  associated  with  the  expiration  of  a
contingent payment arrangement with Rippey resulting from
our 1995 acquisition of selected assets used or created in con-
nection  with  the  development  and  sale  of  polishing  slurries.
We  had  made  payments  under  this  agreement  of  2.5%  of 
applicable  slurry  revenue  from  July  1995  through  our  last 
payment in August 2002.

GROSS PROFIT
Our gross profit as a percentage of total revenue was 51.9% in
2002  as  compared  to  52.3%  in  2001.  The  decrease  in  gross
profit resulted primarily from an increase in fixed manufactur-
ing  costs  offset  partially  by  an  increase  in  weighted  average 
selling prices.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Total  research  and  development  expenses  were  $33.7  million
in 2002, which represented an increase of 30.5% or $7.9 mil-
lion, from 2001. Research and development expense increased
$2.3  million  due  to  increased  staffing,  $2.0  million  due  to
higher  wafer  purchases  and  $1.5  million  due  to  depreciation
and  operating  costs  of  our  new  R&D  facility,  which  opened 
in  April  2002.  An  additional  $1.1  million  increase  resulted
from  allocating  certain  common  facility  operating  costs  to
R&D. These costs had previously been treated as general and
administrative  expense  prior  to  the  R&D  facility  addition  to
our  existing  office  building.  Key  activities  during  the  year
involved  the  continued  development  of  new  and  enhanced
CMP products, with a significant focus on slurries for polish-
ing copper, and new CMP polishing pad technology.

SELLING AND MARKETING
Selling  and  marketing  expenses  were  $9.7  million  in  2002,
which represented an increase of 10.4%, or $0.9 million, over
2001. The increase was primarily due to increased staffing in
North America.

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
General  and  administrative  expenses  were  $17.5  million  in
2002, which represented a decrease of 17.1%, or $3.6 million,
from 2001. The decrease was primarily due to the absence of
$0.7 million of stock compensation and other costs associated
with  an  executive  leaving  the  business  in  fiscal  2001,  a  net
decrease  in  noncash  charges  related  to  modifications  of  stock
option  agreements  of  $0.7  million,  reduced  relocation  and
recruiting costs of $0.5 million, decrease in professional fees of
$0.7 million, decrease in facilities charges of $1.5 million due
to the change in allocation of certain common facility operat-
ing costs described under Research and Development and a net
decrease in the provision for doubtful accounts of $0.9 million.
These reductions were partially offset by an increase in depre-
ciation  of  $1.4  million  associated  with  administrative  areas  of
the R&D facility addition.

LITIGATION SETTLEMENT
During the second fiscal quarter of 2002, we settled all pending
patent infringement litigation with Rodel, which resulted in a
one-time payment of $1.0 million. Under the settlement agree-
ment,  we  received  a  fully  paid-up,  worldwide  royalty-free
license  to  all  technology  that  was  the  subject  of  the  litigation
and their foreign equivalents, and we have no further financial
obligation with respect to this matter.

AMORTIZATION OF INTANGIBLES
Amortization  of  intangibles  was  $0.3  million  in  2002  com-
pared to $0.7 million in 2001. The reduction of approximately
$0.4 million occurred as we adopted SFAS No. 141, “Business
Combinations”  and  SFAS  No.  142,  “Goodwill  and  Other
Intangible Assets,” effective October 1, 2001, which required
the amortization of goodwill to be discontinued and that good-
will be instead tested for impairment at least annually.

OTHER INCOME, NET
Other  income  was  $0.8  million  in  2002,  compared  to  $1.0
million  in  2001.  The  decrease  of  approximately  $0.2  million
was  primarily  due  to  $0.7  million  of  interest  expense  from
capital leases entered into during fiscal 2002, a payment of $0.3
million  to  Cabot  Corporation  in  reimbursement  for  certain
capital improvements made to equipment used to supply us with
material that is no longer in use, and the absence of $0.2 million
interest income on accounts receivable balances. These decreases
were  almost  entirely  offset  by  unrealized  foreign  exchange
gains resulting from the strengthening of the Japanese Yen and
increased interest income due to higher cash balances over the
prior year.

PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
The effective income tax rate was 33.0% in 2002 and 34.0% in
2001. The decrease in the effective tax rate was mainly due to
an increase in tax credits from expanded research and experi-
mentation activities.

NET INCOME
Net  income  was  $40.7  million  in  2002,  which  represented  a
decrease of 2.9%, or $1.2 million, from 2001 as a result of the
factors discussed above.

Liquidity and Capital Resources
We had cash f lows from operating activities of $47.6 million in
2003,  $53.5  million  in  2002  and  $62.5  million  in  2001.  Our
cash provided by operating activities in 2003 originated from
net income from operations of $37.7 million and noncash items
of $27.1 million, which were partially offset by a net increase
in working capital of $17.2 million. Working capital increased
primarily in customer receivables due to higher sales levels, our
transition  from  a  distributor  to  selling  direct  in  Europe,
Singapore and Malaysia, extension of payment terms to a lim-
ited number of customers and also due to a stronger Japanese
Yen.  Inventory  also  increased  to  support  the  higher  level  of
sales and income taxes shifted from a payable to a refundable
position  driven  mainly  by  research  and  experimentation  tax
credits.  Our  principal  funding  requirements  have  been  for
additions  to  property,  plant  and  equipment  that  support  the
expansion of our business and technological capability.

In 2003, cash f lows used in investing activities were $14.5 mil-
lion, primarily due to $16.4 million in purchases of additional
production-related equipment, establishment of 300 mm pol-
ishing capability and for metrology tools to support increased
polishing  capacity  in  our  Class  1  clean  room.  These  capital
expenditures  were  partially  offset  by  $1.9  million  in  cash
received from the sale of assets, of which $1.8 million related
to the January 2003 sale of our distribution center and land in
Ansung, South Korea, which is described more fully below. In
2002, cash f lows used in investing activities were $35.3 million,
primarily due to the construction and completion of our new
research  and  development  facility  in  Aurora,  Illinois,  and
equipping the facility with additional research and development
equipment.  We  also  purchased  additional  production-related
equipment  to  be  used  in  Aurora,  Illinois  and  invested  in  the
development and implementation of our business information
system.  In  2001,  cash  f lows  used  in  investing  activities  were
$35.3  million,  primarily  related  to  the  capacity  expansion  of
our Geino, Japan facility and construction of our new Aurora,
Illinois research and development facility.

We had cash f lows from financing activities of $8.5 million in
2003  which  resulted  from  the  issuance  of  common  stock  of
$12.8 million for the exercise of stock options and to a much
lesser  extent,  the  Employee  Stock  Purchase  Plan,  offset  by  a
$3.5  million  loan  repayment,  which  is  described  below,  and
principal  payments  of  $0.7  million  made  under  capital  lease
obligations. We had cash f lows from financing activities of $3.6
million in 2002 which resulted from the issuance of common
stock of $4.5 million for both the exercise of stock options and
the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, offset partially by principal

15

M   D   &   A   (continued)

payments of $0.9 million made under capital lease obligations.
In  2001  cash  f lows  from  financing  activities  of  $10.4  million
resulted  from  the  exercise  of  stock  options  and  issuance  of
shares under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

In February 2003, we prepaid the entire $3.5 million unsecured
term loan that had been funded on the basis of the Illinois State
Treasurer’s  Economic  Program  which  had  been  due  in  April
2005  and  had  incurred  interest  at  an  annual  rate  of  4.68%. 
No  gain  or  loss  was  recognized  with  respect  to  the  prepay-
ment. As a result of this prepayment, we have no outstanding
long-term debt.

In  July  2001,  we  entered  into  a  $75.0  million  unsecured
revolving  credit  and  term  loan  facility  with  a  group  of  com-
mercial  banks  and  in  February  2002  and  August  2003,  this
agreement  was  amended  with  no  material  changes  in  terms.
On  November  24,  2003,  the  existing  agreement  was  termi-
nated  and  replaced  with  an  amended  and  restated  unsecured
revolving  credit  facility  of  $50.0  million  with  an  option  to
increase the facility by up to $30.0 million. Under this agree-
ment, which terminates in November 2006, but can be renewed
for  two  one-year  terms,  interest  accrues  on  any  outstanding
balance  at  either  the  institution’s  base  rate  or  the  eurodollar
rate plus an applicable margin. A non-use fee also accrues. Loans
under this facility are anticipated to be used primarily for general
corporate  purposes,  including  working  capital  and  capital
expenditures.  The  credit  agreement  also  contains  various
covenants.  No  amounts  are  currently  outstanding  under  this
credit  facility  and  we  believe  we  are  currently  in  compliance
with the covenants.

We  estimate  that  our  total  capital  expenditures  in  fiscal  year
2004 will be approximately $22.0 million, approximately $0.3
million  of  which  we  have  already  spent  as  of  October  31,
2003.  Our  major  capital  expenditures  in  2004  are  currently
expected to be:

• approximately $8.0 million to equip a clean room in the

Asia Pacific region;

• approximately $5.0 million for advanced clean room equip-
ment, polishing and other equipment primarily for use in
our Aurora, IL research and development facility; and

• approximately  $9.0  million  for  general  expansion  of

operations.

As  our  business  needs  in  South  Korea  have  changed,  in
November  2002  we  entered  into  a  purchase  and  sale  agree-
ment with a third party to sell our distribution center and land
in  Ansung,  South  Korea.  The  sale  was  completed  in  January
2003, and the final proceeds approximated the net book value
of the assets sold.

We believe that cash generated by our operations and available
borrowings  under  our  revolving  credit  facility  will  be  suffi-
cient to fund our operations and expected capital expenditures 

for  the  foreseeable  future.  However,  we  plan  to  expand  our
business  and  continue  to  improve  our  technology  and,  to  do
so, we may be required to raise additional funds in the future
through  public  or  private  equity,  debt  financing  or  other
arrangements.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
At September 30, 2003 and 2002, we did not have any uncon-
solidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often
referred  to  as  structured  finance  or  special  purpose  entities,
which might have been established for the purpose of facilitat-
ing off-balance sheet arrangements.

TABULAR DISCLOSURE OF CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The  following  summarizes  our  contractual  obligations  at
September 30, 2003 and the effect such obligations are expected
to have on our liquidity and cash f low in future periods.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

(In millions)

Long-term debt
Capital lease obligations
Operating leases
Purchase obligations
Other long-term 

Total

$ 0.0
9.1
0.9
58.6

Less
Than
1 Year

$ 0.0
1.7
0.4
32.0

1–3
Years

$ 0.0
3.0
0.3
16.6

4–5 After 5
Years

Years

$0.0
2.2
0.1
6.7

$0.0
2.2
0.1
3.3

liabilities

2.1

0.0

1.1

0.0

1.0

Total contractual 
obligations

$70.7

$34.1

$21.0

$9.0

$6.6

CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS
In  December  2001,  we  entered  into  a  fumed  alumina  supply
agreement  with  Cabot  Corporation.  Under  this  agreement,
Cabot Corporation expanded its capacity in Tuscola, Illinois for
the manufacture of fumed alumina. Payments by us with respect
to  capital  costs  for  the  facility  have  been  treated  as  a  capital
lease  for  accounting  purposes  and  the  present  value  of  the
minimum  quarterly  payments  of  approximately  $0.3  million
resulted  in  a  $9.8  million  lease  obligation  and  $9.8  million
related  leased  asset.  The  agreement  has  an  initial  five-year
term, which expires in 2006, but we can choose to renew the
agreement for another five-year term, which would expire in
2011. We also can choose to not renew the agreement subject
to  certain  terms  and  conditions  and  the  payment  of  certain
costs, after the initial five-year term.

In  January  2002,  we  entered  into  a  CMP  tool  and  polishing
consumables  transfer  agreement  with  a  third  party  under
which we agreed to transfer polishing consumables to them in 
return for a CMP polishing tool. The polishing tool has been
treated as a capital lease and the aggregate fair market value of
the polishing consumables resulted in a $2.0 million lease obli-
gation.  The  term  of  the  agreement  is  approximately  three
years, expiring in November 2004.

OPERATING LEASES
We  lease  certain  vehicles,  warehouse  facilities,  office  space,
machinery and equipment under cancelable and noncancelable
operating  leases,  most  of  which  expire  within  ten  years  and
may be renewed by us.

PURCHASE OBLIGATIONS
Purchase  obligations  include  our  take-or-pay  arrangements
with  suppliers,  and  purchase  orders  and  other  obligations
entered  into  in  the  normal  course  of  business  regarding  the
purchase of goods and services. In the fourth quarter of fiscal
2003,  we  recorded  a  $2.0  million  liability  for  a  raw  material
supply agreement for a polishing pad technology that was pre-
viously  under  development,  but  is  no  longer  being  pursued.
Our total obligation with respect to this agreement is $2.2 mil-
lion, of which $1.1 million is recorded in current liabilities and
shown  in  the  preceding  table  under  purchase  obligations  and
$1.1 million is included in other long-term liabilities, which is
discussed below.

We operate under an amended fumed metal oxide agreement
with  Cabot  Corporation  for  the  purchase  of  two  key  raw
materials, fumed silica and fumed alumina. We are obligated to
purchase  at  least  90%  of  our  six-month  volume  forecast  of
fumed  silica  from  Cabot  Corporation  and  must  pay  for  the
shortfall  if  we  purchase  less  than  that  amount.  We  currently
anticipate  meeting  minimum  forecasted  purchase  volume
requirements.  Also,  under  our  fumed  alumina  supply  agree-
ment with Cabot Corporation we are obligated to pay certain
fixed, capital and variable costs through December 2006. This
agreement has an initial five-year term, but we can choose to
renew the agreement for another five-year term, which would
expire in December 2011. If we do not renew the agreement,
we  will  become  subject  to  certain  terms  and  conditions  and
the  payment  of  certain  costs.  Purchase  obligations  include
$23.5  million  of  contractual  commitments  based  upon  our
anticipated renewal of the agreement through December 2011.

We  have  an  agreement  with  a  toll  manufacturer  pursuant  to
which the manufacturer performs certain agreed-upon disper-
sion services. We have agreed to purchase minimum amounts
of  services  per  year  and  to  invest  approximately  $0.2  million
per  year  in  capital  improvements  or  other  expenditures  to
maintain capacity at the manufacturer’s dispersion facility. The
initial  term  of  the  agreement  expires  in  October  2004,  with
automatic one-year renewals, and contains a 90-day cancella-
tion  clause  executable  by  either  party.  We  are  obligated  to
make a termination payment if the agreement is not renewed.
Purchase obligations include $14.3 million of contractual com-
mitments related to this agreement.

We have a distribution agreement with an existing supplier of
polishing pads to the semiconductor industry pursuant to which
the supplier sells product to us for our resale to end users. The 
initial term of the contract runs through September 2007 and
we  are  required  to  make  certain  agreed-upon  purchases  in

order to maintain the agreement. Included in purchase obliga-
tions  is  $5.9  million  for  product  which  we  are  required  and
intend to purchase by September 2004. We currently anticipate
meeting minimum forecasted purchase requirements for periods
subsequent to September 2004. We have the ability to cancel
the agreement at any time with no cancellation fee.

In June 2003, we entered into a technology licensing and co-
marketing agreement with a semiconductor equipment manu-
facturer under which we plan to develop, manufacture and sell
polishing pads utilizing endpoint detection window technology
licensed from the manufacturer for use on the manufacturer’s
equipment.  Under  this  agreement,  we  are  obligated  to  pay
$6.6  million  for  the  purchase  of  capital  equipment,  approxi-
mately  one  year  of  certain  marketing  and  technical  support
services,  and  equipment  services.  As  of  September  30,  2003,
we have paid $4.6 million of this balance. In addition, we are
obligated to supply this manufacturer with free polishing pads,
up to an agreed upon dollar amount, for particular uses over a
seven-year period. We currently estimate our total cost associ-
ated with these products will be $2.2 million over the remain-
ing  period.  We  are  also  obligated  to  supply  the  equipment
manufacturer with polishing pads, up to an agreed upon dollar
amount  over  the  seven-year  period,  which  the  manufacturer
will purchase from us at our cost. We will also pay a royalty to
the  equipment  manufacturer  and,  in  certain  circumstances, 
to  another  party  to  whom  we  are  a  sub-licensee  under  our
agreement,  based  upon  net  revenue  earned  with  respect  to
commercial  sales  of  polishing  pads  covered  under  the  agree-
ment. The agreement’s term lasts as long as the patents on the
technology subject to the license agreement remain valid and
enforceable.

OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
Other long-term liabilities include the $1.1 million long-term
portion of the $2.2 million total purchase obligation discussed
above, that we recorded for a raw material supply agreement
for  a  polishing  pad  technology  that  was  previously  under
development, but is no longer being pursued.

NON-AUDIT SERVICES PERFORMED BY EXTERNAL AUDITORS
Pursuant to Section 10A(i)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act 
of 1934, as added by Section 202 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, we are responsible for disclosing to investors the non-audit
services  approved  by  our  Audit  Committee  to  be  performed
by  PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP,  our  external  auditor.  Non-
audit  services  are  defined  in  the  law  as  services  other  than
those provided in connection with an audit or a review of the
financial statements of the Company. During the period cov-
ered  by  this  filing  our  Audit  Committee  preapproved  the 
following non-audit services, which subsequently were or are
being  performed  by  PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP:  (1)  tax
compliance and research and experimentation credit consulta-
tions;  (2)  tax  compliance  and  consultations  related  to  our 
foreign  operations;  and  (3)  tax  consultations  with  respect  to
our Equity Incentive Plan and other compensation plans.

17

MARKET RISK AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOREIGN
EXCHANGE RATE RISK
During the third and fourth fiscal quarters of 2002, we had a
foreign  exchange  exposure  related  to  a  note  receivable  from
our  wholly-owned  subsidiary  denominated  in  Japanese  Yen
which  resulted  in  unrealized  foreign  exchange  gains  of  $1.5
million.  In  the  fourth  fiscal  quarter  of  2002,  we  hedged  this
exposure. We continue to hedge this exposure and believe that
our  exposure  to  foreign  currency  exchange  rate  risk  on  this
note is not material.

We have performed a sensitivity analysis assuming a hypotheti-
cal  10%  adverse  movement  in  foreign  exchange  rates.  As  of
September 30, 2003, the analysis demonstrated that such mar-
ket  movements  would  not  have  a  material  adverse  effect  on
our  consolidated  financial  position,  results  of  operations  or
cash  f lows  over  a  one-year  period.  Actual  gains  and  losses  in
the  future  may  differ  materially  from  this  analysis  based  on
changes  in  the  timing  and  amount  of  foreign  currency  rate
movements and our actual exposures.

M   D   &   A   (continued)

filed  with 

Website Access to Reports
Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form
10-Q,  definitive  proxy  statements  on  Form  14a,  current
reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports,
are made available free of charge on our Company website at
“www.cabotcmp.com”  as  reasonably  practicable  after  such
reports  are 
the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission (SEC). Statements of charges in beneficial own-
ership  of  our  securities  on  Form  4  by  our  executive  officers
and directors are made available on our Company website by
the  end  of  the  business  day  following  the  submissions  to  the
SEC  of  such  filings.  In  addition,  the  SEC’s  website,
www.sec.gov,  contains  reports,  proxy  statments,  and  other
information  regarding  reports  that  we  file  electronically  with
the SEC.

Code of Ethics
We  have  adopted  a  code  of  business  conduct  for  all  of  our
employees  and  directors,  including  our  principal  executive
officer, other executive officers, principal financial officer and
senior financial personnel. A copy of our code of business con-
duct  is  available  free  of  charge  on  our  Company  website  at
“www.cabotcmp.com”. We intend to post on our website any
material changes to, or waiver from our code of  business con-
duct, if any, within two days of any such event. 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

EFFECT OF CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATES AND
EXCHANGE RATE RISK MANAGEMENT
We  conduct  business  operations  outside  of  the  United  States
through our foreign operations. Our foreign operations main-
tain  their  accounting  records  in  their  local  currencies.
Consequently,  period  to  period  comparability  of  results  of
operations  is  affected  by  f luctuations  in  exchange  rates.  The
primary currencies to which we have exposure are the Japanese
Yen  and,  to  a  lesser  extent,  the  British  Pound  and  the  Euro.
From time to time we enter into forward contracts in an effort
to manage foreign currency exchange exposure. However, we
may be unable to hedge these exposures completely. Approx-
imately  15%  of  our  revenue  is  transacted  in  currencies  other
than the U.S. dollar. We do not currently enter into forward
exchange contracts or other derivative instruments for specula-
tive or trading purposes.

R E P O RT   O F   I N D E P E N D E N T   A U D I T O R S

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of 
Cabot Microelectronics Corporation

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’
equity and cash f lows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Cabot Microelectronics Corporation and its
subsidiaries at September 30, 2003 and 2002, and the results of their operations and their cash f lows for each of the three years in
the  period  ended  September  30,  2003  in  conformity  with  accounting  principles  generally  accepted  in  the  United  States  of
America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management; our responsibility is to express an opin-
ion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with auditing
standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reason-
able assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

Chicago, Illinois
October 21, 2003, except for paragraph 2 of Note 7, as to which the date is November 24, 2003

C O N S O L I D AT E D   S TAT E M E N T S   O F   I N C O M E

19

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

Revenue
Cost of goods sold

Gross profit
Operating expenses:

Research and development
Selling and marketing
General and administrative
Litigation settlement
Amortization of intangibles

Total operating expenses

Operating income
Other income (expense), net

Income before income taxes
Provision for income taxes

Net income

Basic earnings per share

Weighted average basic shares outstanding

Diluted earnings per share

Weighted average diluted shares outstanding

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Year Ended September 30,

2003

2002

2001

$251,665
124,269

$235,165
113,067

$227,192
108,419

127,396

122,098

118,773

41,516
11,221
18,225
—
340

71,302

56,094
(27)

56,067
18,334

33,668
9,667
17,458
1,000
345

62,138

59,960
763

60,723
20,038

25,805
8,757
21,054
—
718

56,334

62,439
1,049

63,488
21,586

$ 37,733

$ 40,685

$ 41,902

$

$

1.55

24,401

1.53

24,665

$

$

1.68

24,160

1.66

24,565

$

$

1.76

23,824

1.72

24,327

C O N S O L I D AT E D   B A L A N C E   S H E E T S

(in thousands, except share amounts)

ASSETS
Current assets:

September 30,

2003

2002

Cash and cash equivalents
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $585 at September 30, 2003 

$111,318

$ 69,605

and $667 at September 30, 2002

Inventories
Prepaid expenses, income taxes refundable and other current assets
Deferred income taxes

Total current assets

Property, plant and equipment, net
Goodwill
Other intangible assets, net
Other long-term assets

Total assets

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:

Accounts payable
Capital lease obligations
Accrued expenses, income taxes payable and other current liabilities

Total current liabilities

Long-term debt
Capital lease obligations
Deferred income taxes
Deferred compensation and other long-term liabilities

Total liabilities

Commitments and contingencies (Note 16)
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock:

Authorized: 200,000,000 shares, $0.001 par value
Issued and outstanding: 24,712,740 shares at September 30, 2003 and 24,254,819 shares 

at September 30, 2002

Capital in excess of par value of common stock
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive gain (loss)
Unearned compensation

Total stockholders’ equity

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

37,564
23,814
4,010
2,406

179,112
133,695
1,373
595
842

26,082
21,959
2,654
2,983

123,283
132,264
1,373
935
530

$315,617

$258,385

$ 12,521
1,716
14,679

$ 11,748
1,585
17,238

28,916
—
7,452
5,384
2,092

43,844

30,571
3,500
8,865
1,514
429

44,879

25
131,913
138,858
1,187
(210)

271,773

24
114,116
101,125
(1,688)
(71)

213,506

$315,617

$258,385

C O N S O L I D AT E D   S TAT E M E N T S   O F   C A S H   F L O W S

(In thousands)

Cash f lows from operating activities:

Year Ended September 30,

2003

2002

2001

Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

$ 37,733

$ 40,685

$ 41,902

Depreciation and amortization
Noncash compensation expense and non-employee stock options
Provision for inventory writedown
Provision for doubtful accounts
Stock option income tax benefits
Deferred income taxes
Unrealized foreign exchange gain
Raw material supply obligation
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment
Other noncash items, net

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

Accounts receivable
Inventories
Prepaid expenses and other assets
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other current liabilities
Income taxes payable, deferred compensation and other noncurrent liabilities

Net cash provided by operating activities

Cash f lows from investing activities:

Additions to property, plant and equipment
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment

Net cash used in investing activities

Cash f lows from financing activities:
Prepayments of long-term debt
Net proceeds from issuance of stock
Principal payments under capital lease obligations

Net cash provided by financing activities

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

Increase in cash
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

Supplemental disclosure of cash f low information:

Cash paid for income taxes
Cash paid for interest

Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing and financing activities:

Issuance of restricted stock
Assets acquired under capital leases (Note 8)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

15,732
(13)
1,352
121
4,822
4,447
(1,535)
1,959
50
198

(10,855)
(2,045)
(378)
(324)
(3,680)

47,584

(16,396)
1,861

(14,535)

(3,500)
12,761
(742)

8,519

145

41,713
69,605

12,009
475
517
(154)
2,059
1,756
(1,504)
—
98
(109)

713
(4,429)
(1,255)
158
2,481

7,787
1,822
902
781
6,587
(394)
—
—
131
—

1,892
(2,827)
1,196
2,997
(232)

53,500

62,544

(35,259)
—

(35,259)

(35,328)
2

(35,326)

21

—
4,500
(857)

3,643

44

21,928
47,677

—
10,390
—

10,390

98

37,706
9,971

$111,318

$ 69,605

$ 47,677

$ 14,420
882
$

$ 14,028
869
$

$ 15,059
304
$

$
$

275
114

$
10
$ 11,770

$
$

660
—

C O N S O L I D AT E D   S TAT E M E N T   O F   C H A N G E S   I N   S T O C K H O L D E R S ’   E Q U I T Y

Accumulated
Other

Retained Comprehensive Comprehensive
Income
Earnings

Unearned
Income Compensation

$ 18,538

$

792

$ (82)

Common
Stock, $0.001
Par Value

$24

Capital
in Excess
of Par

$ 88,290
8,746
6,587

660

106

1,651
1,295

41,902

(632)
(1,351)

$41,902
(632)
(1,351)

$39,919

24

107,335
3,169
2,059

60,440

(1,191)

30

37

1,308
178

40,685

32
(529)

$40,685
32
(529)

$40,188

24
1

114,116
11,556
4,822

101,125

(1,688)

265

30

(89)

6

1,207

Total

$107,562
8,746
6,587

0

421

106

1,651
1,295

39,919

166,287
3,169
2,059

260

20

37

1,308
178

40,188

213,506
11,557
4,822

18

66

20

—

(37)

6

1,207

(660)

421

(321)

260

(10)

(71)

18

(199)

(10)

89

(37)

(In thousands)

Balance at September 30, 2000
Exercise of stock options
Tax benefit on stock options exercised
Issuance of Cabot Microelectronics restricted 
stock under employee compensation plans

Amortization of unearned compensation 

on restricted stock

Issuance of stock options to non-Cabot

Microelectronics employees

Issuance of Cabot Microelectronics stock 
under Employee Stock Purchase Plan

Modification of stock award grants
Net income
Net unrealized loss on derivative instruments
Foreign currency translation adjustment

Total comprehensive income

Balance at September 30, 2001
Exercise of stock options
Tax benefit on stock options exercised
Amortization of unearned compensation 

on restricted stock

Issuance of Cabot Microelectronics restricted 

stock under deposit share plan

Issuance of stock options to non-Cabot

Microelectronics employees

Issuance of Cabot Microelectronics stock 
under Employee Stock Purchase Plan

Modification of stock award grants
Net income
Net unrealized gain on derivative instruments
Foreign currency translation adjustment

Total comprehensive income

Balance at September 30, 2002
Exercise of stock options
Tax benefit on stock options exercised
Amortization of unearned compensation 

on restricted stock

Issuance of Cabot Microelectronics restricted 
stock under employee compensation plans
Issuance of Cabot Microelectronics restricted 

stock under deposit share plan
Forfeiture of Cabot Microelectronics 

restricted stock

Reverse amortization related to restricted 

stock forfeited

Issuance of stock options to non-Cabot

Microelectronics employees

Issuance of Cabot Microelectronics stock 
under Employee Stock Purchase Plan

Net income
Net unrealized gain on derivative instruments
Foreign currency translation adjustment

Total comprehensive income

Balance at September 30, 2003

37,733

34
2,841

$37,733
34
2,841

$40,608

$25

$131,913

$138,858

$ 1,187

40,608

$(210)

$271,773

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

N O T E S   T O   C O N S O L I D AT E D   F I N A N C I A L   S TAT E M E N T S
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

1. Background and Basis of Presentation
We  believe  we  are  the  leading  supplier  of  high  performance
polishing  slurries  used  in  the  manufacture  of  the  most
advanced  integrated  circuit  (“IC”)  devices,  within  a  process
called chemical mechanical planarization (“CMP”). CMP is a
polishing process used by IC device manufacturers to planarize
many  of  the  multiple  layers  of  material  that  are  built  upon 
silicon wafers to produce advanced devices.

Cabot  Microelectronics,  which  was  incorporated  in  October
1999  and  formed  from  the  assets  of  Cabot  Corporation’s
Microelectronics Materials Division, completed its initial pub-
lic  offering  in  April  2000.  In  September  2000,  we  became  a
wholly independent entity upon Cabot Corporation’s spin-off
of its remaining ownership (“spin-off ”) in us by its distribution
of  0.280473721  shares  of  Cabot  Microelectronics  common
stock as a dividend on each share of Cabot Corporation com-
mon stock.

The  consolidated  financial  statements  have  been  prepared  by
Cabot Microelectronics Corporation (“Cabot Microelectronics,”
“the Company,” “us,” “we,” or “our”), pursuant to the rules of
the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and account-
ing principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We  operate  predominantly  in  one  industry  segment—the
development, manufacture, and sale of CMP polishing slurries.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Cabot  Microelectronics  and  its  subsidiaries  and  all  intercom-
pany  transactions  and  balances  between  the  companies  have
been eliminated.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
We consider investments in all highly liquid debt instruments
with  original  maturities  of  three  months  or  less  to  be  cash
equivalents.

INVENTORIES
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost, determined on the
first-in, first-out (FIFO) basis, or market. Finished goods and
work in process inventories include material, labor and manu-
facturing overhead costs.

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation
is based on the following estimated useful lives of the assets using
the straight-line method:

Buildings
Machinery and equipment
Furniture and fixtures
Information systems
Assets under capital leases

20–25 years
5–10 years
5–10 years
3–5 years
5–10 years

Expenditures  for  repairs  and  maintenance  are  charged  to
expense as incurred. Expenditures for major renewals and bet-
terments  are  capitalized  and  depreciated  over  the  remaining
useful  lives.  As  assets  are  retired  or  sold,  the  related  cost  and
accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and
any  resulting  gain  or  loss  is  included  in  the  results  of  opera-
tions.  Costs  related  to  internal  use  software  are  capitalized  in
accordance  with  AICPA  Statement  of  Position  No.  98-1,
“Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed
or Obtained for Internal Use.”

GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill and other intangible assets were acquired in connec-
tion with a July 1995 purchase of selected assets (see Note 3).
Other intangible assets consist of trade secrets and know-how,
distribution rights and customer lists. Goodwill has historically
been amortized on a straight-line basis over 10 years. Effective
October 1, 2001, we adopted SFAS No. 141, “Business Combi-
nations” and SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets.” In accordance with the statement, we ceased amortiz-
ing  goodwill  and  perform  impairment  tests  at  least  annually.
We determined that goodwill was not impaired as of September
30, 2003. Intangible assets continue to be amortized over their
estimated useful lives.

IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
We  review  long-lived  assets  for  impairment  whenever  events
or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable or that the
useful lives of these assets are no longer appropriate. We believe
that no material impairment exists at September 30, 2003.

FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION
Our operations in Europe and Asia operate primarily in local
currency.  Accordingly,  all  assets  and  liabilities  of  these  opera-
tions are translated using exchange rates in effect at the end of
the year, and revenue and costs are translated using weighted
average  exchange  rates  for  the  year.  The  related  translation
adjustments are reported in Comprehensive Income in stock-
holders’ equity. Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency
transactions  are  recorded  in  the  statements  of  income  for  all
periods presented.

FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT
We  transact  business  in  various  foreign  currencies,  primarily
the Japanese Yen, British Pound and the Euro. Our exposure
to  foreign  currency  exchange  risks  has  not  been  significant
because a significant portion of our foreign sales are denomi-
nated in U.S. dollars. However, we have entered into forward
contracts  in  an  effort  to  manage  foreign  currency  exchange
exposure  regarding  our  receivable  and  payable  positions 

23

N O T E S   T O   C O N S O L I D AT E D   F I N A N C I A L   S TAT E M E N T S   (continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

denominated in foreign currencies, and in fiscal 2001, commit-
ments  for  construction  costs  associated  with  our  Geino,  Japan
expansion. The purpose of our foreign currency management
activity is to mitigate the risk that eventual cash f low require-
ments  from  signif icant  foreign  currency  commitments  or
transactions may be adversely affected by changes in exchange
rates  from  the  commitment  or  transaction  date  through  the
settlement  date.  We  do  not  currently  use  derivative  financial
instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The recorded amounts of cash, accounts receivable and accounts
payable approximate their fair values.

CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK
Financial instruments that subject us to concentrations of credit
risk  consist  principally  of  accounts  receivable.  We  perform
ongoing  credit  evaluations  of  our  customers’  financial  condi-
tion and generally do not require collateral to secure accounts
receivable.  Our  exposure  to  credit  risk  associated  with  non-
payment  is  affected  principally  by  conditions  or  occurrences
within  the  semiconductor  industry  and  global  economy.  We
historically  have  not  experienced  material  losses  relating  to
accounts  receivables  from  individual  customers  or  groups  of
customers  and  maintain  an  allowance  for  doubtful  accounts
based on an assessment of the collectibility of such accounts.

The portion of revenue from customers who represented more
than 10% of revenue were as follows:

Year Ended September 30,
2002

2001

2003

Marketech 
Intel 

28%
15%

24%
16%

21%
14%

Marketech is a distributor we use in Taiwan and China.

The two customers above accounted for 30.3% and 26.7% of
net  accounts  receivable  at  September  30,  2003  and  2002,
respectively.

REVENUE RECOGNITION
Revenue is recognized upon completion of delivery obligations,
provided acceptance and collectibility are reasonably assured. A
provision  for  the  estimated  warranty  cost  is  recorded  at  the
time revenue is recognized based on our historical experience.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.

INCOME TAXES
Deferred income taxes are determined based on the estimated
future  tax  effects  of  differences  between  financial  statement
carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabil-
ities.  Provisions  are  made  for  the  U.S.  and  any  non-U.S.
deferred income tax liability or benefit.

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
We  have  adopted  the  disclosure  requirements  of  SFAS  No.
148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition
and Disclosure” (“SFAS 148”) effective December 2002. SFAS
148  amends  the  Financial  Accounting  Standards  Board
(“FASB”)  Statement  No.  123,  “Accounting  for  Stock-Based
Compensation” (“SFAS 123”), to provide alternative methods
of  transition  for  a  voluntary  change  to  the  fair  value  based
method  of  accounting  for  stock-based  compensation  and  also
amends  the  disclosure  requirements  of  SFAS  123  to  require
prominent  disclosures  in  both  annual  and  interim  financial
statements  about  the  methods  of  accounting  for  stock-based
employee compensation and the effect of the method used on
reported results. As permitted by SFAS 148 and SFAS 123, we
continue  to  apply  the  accounting  provisions  of  Accounting
Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion Number 25, “Accounting
for  Stock  Issued  to  Employees,”  and  related  interpretations,
with  regard  to  the  measurement  of  compensation  cost  for
options granted under the Cabot Microelectronics Corporation
Amended  and  Restated  2000  Equity  Incentive  Plan  (“Equity
Incentive Plan”) and shares issued under our Employee Stock
Purchase Plan. All options granted had an exercise price equal
to  the  market  value  of  the  underlying  common  stock  on  the
date of grant and no employee compensation expense has been
recorded. See Note 13 to consolidated financial statements for
a  discussion  of  the  assumptions  used  in  the  option  valuation
model and estimated fair value for employee stock options.

Had  expense  been  recognized  using  the  fair  value  method
described in SFAS 123, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model,  we  would  have  reported  the  following  results  of 
operations:

Net income, as reported
Deduct: total stock-based 
compensation expense 
determined under the fair 
value method, net of tax

Year Ended September 30,

2003

2002

2001

$ 37,733

$ 40,685

$41,902

(16,531)

(12,494)

(9,322)

Pro forma net income

$ 21,202

$ 28,191

$32,580

Earnings per share:

Basic—as reported

Basic—pro forma

Diluted—as reported

Diluted—pro forma

$

$

$

$

1.55

0.87

1.53

0.86

$

$

$

$

1.68

1.17

1.66

1.15

$ 1.76

$ 1.37

$ 1.72

$ 1.34

EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic  earnings  per  share  is  calculated  based  on  the  weighted
average shares of common stock outstanding during the period,
and diluted earnings per share is calculated based on the weighted
average of common stock outstanding, plus the dilutive effect
of stock options, calculated using the treasury stock method.

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Comprehensive income differs from net income due to foreign
currency  translation  adjustments  and  net  unrealized  gains  and
losses on derivative instruments.

USE OF ESTIMATES
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with
accounting  principles  generally  accepted  in  the  United  States
requires  management  to  make  certain  estimates  and  assump-
tions  that  affect  the  reported  amounts  of  assets  and  liabilities
and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of  the  financial  statements  and  the  reported  amounts  of  rev-
enue  and  expenses  during  the  reported  period.  Actual  results
could differ from those estimates.

EFFECTS OF RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, “Amendment
of  Statement  133  on  Derivative  Instruments  and  Hedging
Activities”  (“SFAS  149”)  which  applies  to  contracts  entered
into  or  modified  after  June  30,  2003.  SFAS  149  amends  and
clarifies accounting for derivative instruments, including certain
derivative  instruments  embedded  in  other  contracts,  and  for
hedging activities under SFAS 133, “Accounting for Derivative
Instruments  and  Hedging  Activities.”  We  do  not  expect  the
adoption of SFAS 149 will have a material impact on our con-
solidated financial position, results of operations or cash f lows.

In  May  2003,  the  FASB  issued  SFAS  No.  150,  “Accounting
for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both
Liabilities  and  Equity”  (“SFAS  150”)  which  improves  the
accounting for certain financial instruments that, under previ-
ous guidance, issuers could account for as equity. Examples of
such  financial  instruments  include  mandatorily  redeemable
shares,  put  options  and  forward  purchase  contracts  that  may
require the issuer to buy back some of its shares in exchange
for cash or other assets and obligations that can be settled with
shares.  We  currently  do  not  hold  these  types  of  f inancial
instruments.

3. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
In  July  1995,  we  acquired  selected  assets  used  or  created  in
connection  with  the  development  and  sale  of  polishing  slur-
ries.  The  acquisition  was  accounted  for  using  the  purchase
method  of  accounting.  Accordingly,  the  purchase  price  of
$9,800 was allocated to the net assets acquired based on their
estimated  fair  values.  Identifiable  intangible  assets,  consisting
primarily  of  trade  secrets  and  know-how,  distribution  rights,
customer  lists  and  workforce  in  place,  were  valued  at  $4,300
and were amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated
useful lives of 7–10 years. The excess of purchase price over the 

fair  value  of  the  net  assets  acquired  (goodwill)  was  approxi-
mately  $2,800.  Effective  October  2001,  we  adopted  SFAS 
No.  141,  “Business  Combinations”  and  SFAS  No.  142,
“Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” which resulted in the
reclassification of a portion of intangible assets regarding work-
force  in  place  to  goodwill.  We  determined  that  the  resulting 
unamortized  goodwill  balance  was  not  impaired.  In  accord-
ance  with  the  statement,  we  ceased  amortizing  goodwill  and
perform  impairment  tests  at  least  annually.  In  addition  to  the
purchase  price,  we  also  made  contingent  payments  in  the
amount of 2.5% of applicable slurry revenue. These payments
were recorded and paid on a monthly basis and are included in
cost  of  goods  sold.  In  fiscal  2002  we  finished  making  these
contingent  payments,  which  completely  terminated  our  obli-
gation under this contract.

Goodwill of $1,373, as of September 30, 2003, was unchanged
from September 30, 2002.

The components of intangible assets are as follows:

September 30, 2003

Gross Carrying
Amount

Accumulated
Amortization

Trade secrets and know-how
Distribution rights, customer lists 

and other

Total intangible assets

$2,550

1,000

$3,550

$2,105

850

$2,955

25

September 30, 2002

Gross Carrying
Amount

Accumulated
Amortization

Trade secrets and know-how
Distribution rights, customer lists 

and other

Total intangible assets

$2,550

1,000

$3,550

$1,850

765

$2,615

Estimated future amortization expense for fiscal 2004 and fiscal
2005 are $340 and $255, respectively.

4. Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following:

Raw materials
Work in process
Finished goods

Total

September 30,

2003

2002

$13,327
1,110
9,377

$13,779
1,173
7,007

$23,814

$21,959

N O T E S   T O   C O N S O L I D AT E D   F I N A N C I A L   S TAT E M E N T S   (continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

5. Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following:

Land
Buildings
Machinery and equipment
Furniture and fixtures
Information systems
Capital leases
Construction in progress

Total property, plant and equipment
Less: accumulated depreciation and

September 30,

2003

2002

$ 13,511
55,571
72,237
4,623
9,926
11,884
8,622

$ 13,705
55,458
61,492
4,657
8,740
11,770
3,758

176,374

159,580

amortization of assets under capital leases

(42,679)

(27,316)

Net property, plant and equipment

$133,695

$132,264

Depreciation expense, including amortization of assets recorded
under capital leases, was $15,392, $11,667 and $7,069 for the
years ended September 30, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

6. Accrued Expenses, Income Taxes Payable and 

Other Current Liabilities

Accrued  expenses,  income  taxes  and  other  current  liabilities
consisted of the following:

Raw material accruals
Accrued compensation
Warranty accrual
Fixed asset accrual
Income taxes payable
Other

Total

September 30,
2003

2002

$ 2,305
7,743
836
579
—
3,216

$

851
8,302
858
1,375
2,662
3,190

$14,679

$17,238

We record actual warranty expense in cost of goods sold in the
period in which warranty claims occur. We calculate our war-
ranty reserve shown above using historical experience and any
known conditions or circumstances, and we perform periodic
reviews of our warranty reserve requirements and make appro-
priate adjustments to the reserve as necessary. Adjustments to
the  warranty  reserve  affect  cost  of  goods  sold.  Our  warranty
obligation is affected primarily by product that does not meet
specifications  and  performance  requirements  and  any  related
costs of addressing such matters. Our warranty reserve require-
ments decreased during fiscal 2003 as follows:

Balance as of September 30, 2002
Net change

Balance as of September 30, 2003

$858
(22)

$836

7. Long-Term Debt
In  February  2003,  we  prepaid  the  entire  $3,500  unsecured
term  loan  that  had  been  funded  on  the  basis  of  the  Illinois
State  Treasurer’s  Economic  Program  which  had  been  due  in
April  2005  and  had  incurred  interest  at  an  annual  rate  of
4.68%. No gain or loss was recognized with respect to the pre-
payment. As a result of this prepayment, we have no outstanding
long-term debt.

In July 2001, we entered into a $75,000 unsecured revolving
credit and term loan facility with a group of commercial banks
and  in  February  2002  and  August  2003,  this  agreement  was
amended  with  no  material  changes  in  terms.  On  November
24, 2003, the existing agreement was terminated and replaced
with an amended and restated unsecured revolving credit facil-
ity of $50,000 with an option to increase the facility by up to
$30,000. Under this agreement, which terminates in November
2006,  but  can  be  renewed  for  two  one-year  terms,  interest
accrues  on  any  outstanding  balance  at  either  the  institution’s
base rate or the eurodollar rate plus an applicable margin. A non-
use fee also accrues. Loans under this facility are anticipated to
be  used  primarily  for  general  corporate  purposes,  including
working capital and capital expenditures. The credit agreement
also  contains  various  covenants.  No  amounts  are  currently
outstanding  under  this  credit  facility  and  we  believe  we  are
currently in compliance with the covenants.

8. Capital Lease Obligations
In  December  2001,  we  entered  into  a  fumed  alumina  supply
agreement with Cabot Corporation under which we agreed to
pay Cabot Corporation for the expansion of a fumed alumina
manufacturing  facility  in  Tuscola,  Illinois.  The  payments  for
the facility have been treated as a capital lease for accounting
purposes and the present value of the minimum quarterly pay-
ments  resulted  in  a  $9,776  lease  obligation  and  related  leased
asset.  The  agreement  has  an  initial  five-year  term,  which
expires  in  2006,  but  we  can  choose  to  renew  the  agreement
for another five-year term, which expires in 2011. We also can
choose  not  to  renew  the  agreement  subject  to  certain  terms
and conditions and the payment of certain costs, after the ini-
tial five-year term.

In  January  2002,  we  entered  into  a  CMP  tool  and  polishing
consumables transfer agreement with a third party under which
we agreed to transfer polishing consumables to them in return
for a CMP polishing tool. The polishing tool has been treated as
a capital lease for accounting purposes and is valued based on the 

aggregate fair market value of the polishing consumables, which
resulted in a $1,994 lease obligation. The agreement has approx-
imately a three-year term, which expires in November 2004.

In July 2003, we entered into a leasing arrangement for forklift
trucks. The lease has a five-year term with a bargain purchase
option  at  the  end  of  the  term.  The  forklift  trucks  have  been
treated as a capital lease for accounting purposes, resulting in a
$114 lease obligation and related leased asset.

9. Derivatives
In  the  first  quarter  of  fiscal  2001,  we  adopted  Statement  of
Financial  Accounting  Standards  No.  133  (“SFAS  133”),
“Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,”
which establishes accounting and reporting standards for deriv-
ative  instruments  and  for  hedging  activities.  All  derivatives,
whether designated in hedging relationships or not, are required
to be recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. If the deriva-
tive is designated as a fair value hedge, the changes in the fair
value of the derivative and of the hedged item attributable to
the hedged risk are recognized in earnings. If the derivative is
designated  as  a  cash  f low  hedge,  the  effective  portions  of
changes in the fair value of the derivative are recorded in other
comprehensive  income  and  are  recognized  in  the  income
statement  when  the  hedged  item  affects  earnings.  Ineffective
portions  of  changes  in  the  fair  value  of  cash  f low  hedges  are
recognized in earnings.

During fiscal 2001, we entered into two cash f low hedges to
cover  commitments  involving  construction  contracts  associ-
ated with our Geino, Japan expansion. The adoption of SFAS
133 resulted in a reduction to comprehensive income for the
twelve months ended September 30, 2001 of $632. We reclas-
sify losses currently in other comprehensive income associated
with the cash f low hedges into earnings in the same period or
periods  in  which  the  related  assets  affect  earnings,  which
resulted in a gain in other comprehensive income of $34 and
$32 in fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002, respectively. There were no
other significant derivatives as of September 30, 2003.

At  September  30,  2003,  we  had  one  forward  contract  selling
Japanese Yen related to an intercompany note with one of our
subsidiaries  in  Japan  and  for  the  purpose  of  hedging  the  risk
associated with a net transactional exposure in Japanese Yen.

10. Deferred Compensation
Under  the  Directors’  Deferred  Compensation  Plan,  which
became  effective  in  March  2001,  all  of  our  non-employee
directors  have  elected  to  defer  their  compensation  to  future 

periods. In June 2003, this plan was amended to require that
payment  of  deferred  amounts  be  made  only  in  the  form  of
Cabot  Microelectronics  common  shares.  Amounts  deferred 
under the plan were $481 and $136 as of September 30, 2003
and  2002,  respectively.  We  do  not  currently  maintain  a
deferred compensation plan for employees.

11. Savings Plan and Other Incentive Compensation Plans
Effective in May 2000, we adopted the Cabot Microelectronics
Corporation 401(k) Plan (the “401(k) Plan”) covering substan-
tially all eligible employees meeting certain minimum age and
eligibility requirements, as defined by the 401(k) Plan. Partici-
pants  may  make  elective  contributions  up  to  15%  of  their 
eligible  salary.  All  amounts  contributed  by  participants  and
earnings  on  these  contributions  are  fully  vested  at  all  times.
The 401(k) Plan provides for matching and fixed nonelective
contributions  by  the  Company.  Under  the  401(k)  Plan,  the
Company  will  match  100%  of  the  first  four  percent  of  the 
participant’s eligible compensation and 50% of the next two
percent  of  the  participant’s  eligible  compensation,  subject  to
limitations required by government laws or regulations. Under
the  401(k)  Plan,  all  employees,  even  non-participants,  will
receive a contribution by the Company in an amount equal to
4%  of  eligible  compensation.  Participants  and  employees  are
100%  vested  in  all  Company  contributions.  The  Company’s
expense  for  the  defined  contribution  plan  totaled  $2,924,
$2,043 and $1,693 for the periods ending September 30, 2003,
2002 and 2001, respectively.

Effective in May 2000, we adopted the Cabot Microelectronics
Corporation  Supplemental  Employee  Retirement  Plan
(“SERP”)  covering  all  eligible  employees  as  defined  by  the
SERP. Under the SERP, the Company contributes up to 4%
of these individuals’ eligible compensation. The purpose of the
SERP is to provide for the deferral of the Company contribu-
tion  to  certain  highly  compensated  employees  as  defined
under  the  provision  of  the  Employee  Retirement  Income
Security Act (“ERISA”) of 1974. All amounts contributed by
the  Company  and  earnings  on  these  contributions  are  fully
vested at all times. The Company’s expense for the SERP was
de minimis for periods ending September 30, 2003, 2002 and
2001, respectively.

12. Employee Stock Purchase Plan
In March 2000, Cabot Microelectronics adopted an Employee
Stock  Purchase  Plan  (“ESPP”)  and  authorized  up  to  475,000
shares of common stock to be purchased under the plan. The
ESPP allows all full and certain part-time employees of Cabot 

27

N O T E S   T O   C O N S O L I D AT E D   F I N A N C I A L   S TAT E M E N T S   (continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

Microelectronics and its subsidiaries to purchase shares of our
common  stock  through  payroll  deductions.  Employees  can
elect to have up to 10% of their annual earnings withheld to
purchase our stock, subject to certain other criteria. The shares
are purchased at a price equal to the lower of 85% of the clos-
ing  price  at  the  beginning  or  end  of  each  semi-annual  stock 
purchase period. A total of 32,132, 30,248 and 75,790 shares
were  issued  under  the  ESPP  during  fiscal  2003,  2002  and
2001, respectively.

13. Equity Incentive Plans
In March 2000, our Board of Directors and Cabot Corporation’s
Board  of  Directors  adopted  the  Company’s  2000  Equity
Incentive  Plan  (the  “Plan”),  which  was  approved  by  Cabot
Corporation as the sole stockholder of Cabot Microelectronics.
Our Board of Directors amended the Plan in September 2000
and in December 2000, amended and restated the Plan, which
was  then  approved  by  our  stockholders  in  March  2001.  The
Board and stockholders approved 6,500,000 shares of common
stock to be granted under the Plan, subject to adjustment for
stock splits and similar events. The Board made an additional
non-material amendment to the Plan in June 2003. The Plan
allows  for  the  granting  of  three  types  of  equity  incentive
awards: Restricted Stock, Stock Options, and Substitute Awards.
According to the Plan, all employees, directors, consultants and
advisors  of  the  Company  and  its  subsidiaries  are  eligible  for
awards under the Plan, which awards will be awarded subject
to applicable Award Agreements. The Plan is administered by
the Compensation Committee of the Cabot Microelectronics
Board of Directors.

RESTRICTED STOCK
Under  the  Plan,  employees  and  non-employees  are  granted
shares of restricted stock at the discretion of the Compensation
Committee.  In  general,  shares  of  restricted  stock  may  not  be
sold,  assigned,  transferred,  pledged,  disposed  of  or  otherwise
encumbered. Generally, under our Award Agreements to date
for  restricted  stock,  restrictions  have  lapsed  over  a  two-year
period  with  one-third  becoming  unrestricted  immediately  at
the date of grant and the remaining restrictions lapsing over a
two-year period. Holders of restricted stock have all the rights
of  stockholders,  including  voting  and  dividend  rights,  subject
to the above restrictions. In no event shall the Company issue
more  than  875,000  shares  of  restricted  stock  under  the  Plan.
Restricted  shares  may  also  be  purchased  and  placed  “on
deposit” by executive level employees under the 2001 Deposit
Share  Plan.  Shares  purchased  under  this  Deposit  Share  Plan 

receive  a  50%  match  in  restricted  shares,  which  vest  over  a
three-year  period,  and  are  subject  to  forfeiture  upon  early
withdrawal of deposit shares.

In fiscal 2003, we issued 636 restricted shares at $47.04 under
the  Deposit  Share  Plan  and  4,400  restricted  shares  to  an
employee  at  $60.24.  In  fiscal  2002,  we  issued  369  restricted
shares  at  $81.16  under  the  Deposit  Share  Plan  and  no  other
restricted  shares  were  granted  during  the  fiscal  year.  In  fiscal
2001,  we  granted  10,000  shares  of  restricted  stock  to  an
employee  at  $39.19  per  share  and  4,000  shares  of  restricted
stock to an employee at $67.07 per share, of which the 1,334
shares  that  were  still  restricted  were  forfeited  upon  the
employee’s  resignation  in  October  2002.  This  forfeiture
resulted  in  a  reversal  of  previously  recognized  compensation
expense of $37, which was recorded in fiscal 2003 and offset
compensation  expense  in  that  year  of  $18.  Compensation
expense  associated  with  restricted  stock  awards  was  $260  and
$421  for  fiscal  2002  and  2001,  respectively.  In  fiscal  2003,
unearned  compensation  of  $209  was  partially  offset  by  the
reversal of $89 due to the previously mentioned forfeiture. In
fiscal 2002, $10 was recorded as unearned compensation. The
number of shares subject to restrictions were 5,405, 5,037 and
10,168 at September 30, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

STOCK OPTIONS
Under the Plan, employees and non-employees may be granted
incentive  stock  options  (“ISO”)  to  purchase  common  stock 
at  not  less  than  the  fair  value  on  the  date  of  grant,  and  non-
qualified  stock  options  (“NQSO”),  as  determined  by  the
Compensation Committee and set forth in an applicable Award
Agreement.  The  Plan  provides  that  the  term  of  the  option
may be as long as ten years. Options granted during fiscal 2003
and 2002 generally provided for a ten-year term, with options
vesting  equally  over  a  four-year  period,  with  first  vesting  on
the  anniversary  date  of  the  grant.  Options  granted  in  2001
generally provided for a seven-year term and also vested over a
four-year period. No more than 1,750,000 ISO shares may be
issued under the Plan, and none have been granted to date.

In  fiscal  2003,  no  compensation  expense  was  recorded  with
respect to stock options. In fiscal 2002, we recorded compen-
sation  expense  of  $178  associated  with  revised  stock  option
agreements  involving  a  former  director.  In  fiscal  2001,  we
recorded  compensation  expense  of  $1,295  associated  with
revised  stock  option  agreements  involving  a  former  director
and a former employee.

The following tables relate to stock options outstanding as of
September 30, 2003:

Outstanding at September 30, 2000
Granted
Exercised
Canceled

Outstanding at September 30, 2001
Granted
Exercised
Canceled

Outstanding at September 30, 2002
Granted
Exercised
Canceled

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

$20.44
64.29
21.98
41.76

45.97
50.33
21.98
50.40

48.64
50.38
27.09
59.28

Stock
Options

1,256,430
1,218,176
(397,963)
(49,655)

2,026,988
1,018,425
(144,203)
(82,446)

2,818,764
918,500
(426,488)
(168,570)

Outstanding at September 30, 2003

3,142,206

$51.50

Range of
Exercise Price

$20.00
$37.42–$58.94
$62.00–$69.69

Range of
Exercise Price

$20.00
$37.42–$58.94
$62.00–$69.69

Number
of Shares

387,344
1,774,887
979,975

3,142,206

Options Outstanding

Weighted Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

Average
Contractual
Life (in Years)

1.5
8.7
4.7

$20.00
49.81
67.03

$51.50

Options Exercisable

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

$20.00
48.19
67.08

$46.85

Number
of Shares

382,344
211,813
493,550

1,087,707

We  adopted  the  disclosure  requirements  of  SFAS  123  upon
establishing the Plan. As permitted by SFAS 123, we continue
to  apply  the  accounting  provisions  of  Accounting  Principles
Board (“APB”) Opinion Number 25, “Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees” with regard to the measurement of com-
pensation cost for options granted under the Equity Incentive
Plan  and  shares  issued  under  our  ESPP.  Had  expense  been 

recognized using the fair value method described in SFAS 123,
using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model we would have
reported the following results of operations:

Pro forma net income
Pro forma basic net income 

per share

Pro forma diluted net income 

Year Ended September 30,
2002

2003

2001

$21,202

$28,191

$32,580

$ 0.87

$ 1.17

$ 1.37

per share

$ 0.86

$ 1.15

$ 1.34

These  costs  may  not  be  representative  of  the  total  effects  on
pro forma reported income for future years. Factors that may
also impact disclosures in future years include the attribution of
the  awards  to  the  service  period,  the  vesting  period  of  stock
options, timing of additional grants of stock option awards and
number of shares granted for future awards. The fair value of
our  stock-based  awards  to  employees  under  SFAS  123  was
estimated  assuming  no  expected  dividends  and  the  following
weighted average assumptions:

Options

ESPP

2003

2002

2001

2003

2002

2001

Expected term 
(in years)

Expected volatility
Risk-free rate 
of return

5
76%

5

5
85% 97%

.5
45%

.5

.5
57% 94%

3.0% 2.8% 4.0%

1.0% 1.6% 2.4%

29

14. Stockholders’ Equity

COMMON STOCK
Each share of common stock entitles the holder to one vote on
all  matters  submitted  to  a  vote  of  Cabot  Microelectronics’
stockholders.  Common  stockholders  are  entitled  to  receive
ratably the dividends, if any, as may be declared by the Board
of  Directors.  Upon  liquidation,  dissolution  or  winding  up  of
Cabot  Microelectronics,  the  common  stockholders  will  be
entitled to share, pro ratably, in the distribution of assets avail-
able after satisfaction of all liabilities and liquidation preferences
of  preferred  stockholders,  if  any.  The  number  of  authorized
shares of common stock is 200,000,000 shares.

STOCKHOLDER RIGHTS PLAN
In  March  2000,  the  Board  of  Directors  of  Cabot  Micro-
electronics  approved  a  stock  rights  agreement  and  declared 
a  dividend  distribution  of  one  right  to  purchase  one  one-
thousandth  of  a  share  of  Series  A  Junior  Participating 

N O T E S   T O   C O N S O L I D AT E D   F I N A N C I A L   S TAT E M E N T S   (continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

Preferred  Stock  for  each  outstanding  share  of  common  stock
to  stockholders  of  record  on  April  7,  2000.  The  rights
become  exercisable  based  upon  certain  limited  conditions
related to acquisitions of stock, tender offers and certain busi-
ness combination transactions.

15. Income Taxes
Income before income taxes was as follows:

Domestic
Foreign

Total

Year Ended September 30,

2003

2002

2001

$50,969
5,098

$51,772
8,951

$53,606
9,882

$56,067

$60,723

$63,488

Taxes on income consisted of the following:

U.S. federal and state:
Current
Deferred

Total

Foreign:
Current
Deferred

Total

Year Ended September 30,

2003

2002

2001

$12,106
3,810

$13,946
2,460

$17,579
410

$15,916

$16,406

$17,989

$ 2,821
(403)

$ 4,198
(566)

$ 3,817
(220)

2,418

3,632

3,597

Total U.S. and foreign

$18,334

$20,038

$21,586

The  provision  for  income  taxes  at  our  effective  tax  rate  dif-
fered from the provision for income taxes at the statutory rate
as follows:

Significant components of deferred income taxes were as follows:

Deferred tax assets:

Employee benefits
Inventory
Depreciation and amortization
Product warranty
Bad debt reserve
State and local taxes
Translation adjustment
Other, net

September 30,

2003

2002

$1,565
1,026
374
337
205
112
—
128

$2,316
588
718
381
233
180
901
204

Total deferred tax assets

$3,747

$5,521

Deferred tax liabilities:

Depreciation and amortization
Translation adjustment
State and local taxes
Other, net

Total deferred tax liabilities

$6,001
323
199
201

$3,804
—
132
116

$6,724

$4,052

16. Commitments and Contingencies

LEASE COMMITMENTS
We  lease  certain  vehicles,  warehouse  facilities,  office  space,
machinery and equipment under cancelable and noncancelable
leases,  most  of  which  expire  within  ten  years  and  may  be
renewed by us. Rent expense under such arrangements during
fiscal  2003,  2002  and  2001  totaled  $579,  $482  and  $1,400,
respectively.

Future  minimum  rental  commitments  under  noncancelable
leases as of September 30, 2003 are as follows:

Year Ended September 30,
2002

2001

2003

Computed tax expense at the 

federal statutory rate

U.S. benefits from research 
and development activities
State taxes, net of federal effect
U.S. benefits from foreign sales
Other, net

35.0%

35.0%

35.0%

(2.9)
1.1
(0.7)
0.2

(2.0)
1.2
(0.7)
(0.5)

(1.5)
1.5
(1.3)
0.3

Fiscal Year

2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Thereafter

Provision for income taxes

32.7%

33.0%

34.0%

Amount related to interest

Capital lease obligation

Operating

Capital

$442
147
97
79
63
115

$943

$ 2,439
1,552
1,369
1,369
1,365
3,696

11,790

(2,622)

$ 9,168

PURCHASE OBLIGATIONS
We have entered into take-or-pay arrangements with suppliers,
and purchase orders and other obligations in the normal course
of  business  regarding  the  purchase  of  goods  and  services  and
other.  In  the  fourth  quarter  of  fiscal  2003,  we  recorded  a
$1,959 liability for a raw material supply agreement for a pol-
ishing pad technology that was previously under development,
but  is  no  longer  being  pursued.  Our  total  obligation  with
respect to this agreement is $2,234, of which $1,100 has been
recorded  in  current  liabilities  and  $1,134  in  other  long-term
liabilities.

We operate under an amended fumed metal oxide agreement
with  Cabot  Corporation  for  the  purchase  of  two  key  raw
materials, fumed silica and fumed alumina. We are obligated to
purchase  at  least  90%  of  our  six-month  volume  forecast  of
fumed  silica  from  Cabot  Corporation  and  must  pay  for  the
shortfall  if  we  purchase  less  than  that  amount.  We  currently
anticipate  meeting  minimum  forecasted  purchase  volume
requirements.  Also,  under  our  fumed  alumina  supply  agree-
ment with Cabot Corporation we are obligated to pay certain
fixed,  capital  and  variable  costs  through  December  of  2006.
This  agreement  has  an  initial  five-year  term,  but  we  can
choose  to  renew  the  agreement  for  another  five-year  term,
which  would  expire  in  December  2011.  If  we  do  not  renew
the  agreement,  we  will  become  subject  to  certain  terms  and
conditions and the payment of certain costs. We are obligated
to  pay  $23,504  of  contractual  commitments  based  upon  our
anticipated renewal of the agreement through December 2011.

We  have  an  agreement  with  a  toll  manufacturer  pursuant  to
which the manufacturer performs certain agreed-upon disper-
sion services. We have agreed to purchase minimum amounts
of services per year and to invest approximately $150 per year
in  capital  improvements  or  other  expenditures  to  maintain
capacity  at  the  manufacturer’s  dispersion  facility.  The  initial
term  of  the  agreement  expires  in  October  2004,  with  auto-
matic  one-year  renewals,  and  contains  a  90-day  cancellation
clause  executable  by  either  party.  We  are  obligated  to  pay
$14,340 of contractual commitments related to this agreement
and we would be obligated to make a termination payment if
the agreement is not renewed.

We have a distribution agreement with an existing supplier of
polishing  pads  to  the  semiconductor  industry  pursuant  to
which  the  supplier  sells  product  to  us  for  our  resale  to  end 

users. The initial term of the contract runs through September
2007  and  we  are  required  to  make  certain  agreed-upon  pur-
chases in order to maintain the agreement. We are obligated to 
pay  $5,877  for  product  which  we  are  required  and  intend  to
purchase by September 2004. We currently anticipate meeting
minimum forecasted purchase requirements for periods subse-
quent  to  September  2004.  We  have  the  ability  to  cancel  the
agreement at any time with no cancellation fee.

In  June  2003,  we  entered  into  a  technology  licensing  and 
co-marketing  agreement  with  a  semiconductor  equipment
manufacturer  under  which  we  plan  to  develop,  manufacture
and  sell  polishing  pads  utilizing  endpoint  detection  window
technology  licensed  from  the  manufacturer  for  use  on  the
manufacturer’s equipment. Under this agreement, we are obli-
gated  to  pay  $6,587  for  the  purchase  of  capital  equipment,
approximately  one  year  of  certain  marketing  and  technical
support services, and equipment services. As of September 30,
2003, we have paid $4,628 of this balance. In addition, we are
obligated to supply this manufacturer with free polishing pads,
up to an agreed upon dollar amount, for particular uses over a
seven-year period. We currently estimate our total cost associ-
ated  with  these  products  will  be  $2,213  over  the  remaining
period. We are also obligated to supply the equipment manu-
facturer  with  polishing  pads,  up  to  an  agreed  upon  dollar
amount  over  the  seven-year  period,  which  the  manufacturer
will purchase from us at our cost. We will also pay a royalty 
to the equipment manufacturer and, in certain circumstances,
to  another  party  to  whom  we  are  a  sub-licensee  under  our
agreement,  based  upon  net  revenue  earned  with  respect  to
commercial  sales  of  polishing  pads  covered  under  the  agree-
ment. The agreement’s term lasts as long as the patents on the
technology subject to the license agreement remain valid and
enforceable.

INDEMNIFICATION DISCLOSURE
In the normal course of business, we are a party to a variety of
agreements pursuant to which we may be obligated to indem-
nify the other party with respect to certain matters. Generally,
these obligations arise in the context of agreements entered into
by  us,  under  which  we  customarily  agree  to  hold  the  other
party  harmless  against  losses  arising  from  a  breach  of  repre-
sentations  and  covenants  related  to  such  matters  as  title  to
assets  sold,  certain  intellectual  property  rights  and,  in  certain
circumstances,  specified  environmental  matters.  These  terms
are common in the industry in which we conduct business. In 

31

N O T E S   T O   C O N S O L I D AT E D   F I N A N C I A L   S TAT E M E N T S   (continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

each of these circumstances, payment by us is subject to certain
monetary  and  other  limitations  and  is  conditioned  on  the
other  party  making  an  adverse  claim  pursuant  to  the  proce-
dures  specified  in  the  particular  agreement,  which  typically
allow us to challenge the other party’s claims.

We  evaluate  estimated  losses  for  such  indemnifications  under
SFAS  No.  5,  “Accounting  for  Contingencies”  as  interpreted
by FASB Interpretation No. 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and
Disclosure  Requirements  for  Guarantees,  Including  Indirect
Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others” (“FIN 45”). We con-
sider such factors as the degree of probability of an unfavorable
outcome and the ability to make a reasonable estimate of the
amount  of  loss.  To  date,  we  have  not  encountered  material
costs  as  a  result  of  such  obligations  and  as  of  September  30,
2003, have not recorded any liabilities related to such indem-
nifications in our financial statements as we do not believe the
likelihood of a material obligation is probable.

17. Litigation Settlement
We  periodically  become  subject  to  legal  proceedings  in  the
ordinary course of business. We are not currently involved in
any  legal  proceedings  which  we  believe  will  have  a  material
impact on our consolidated financial position, results of opera-
tions, or cash f lows.

In  February  2002,  we  settled  all  pending  patent  infringement
litigation  involving  us  and  one  of  our  major  competitors,
Rodel, Inc., for a one-time payment to Rodel of $1,000, which
we  recorded  as  expense  in  the  second  fiscal  quarter,  and  we
have no further financial obligation with respect to this matter.
The litigation, entitled Rodel, Inc. v. Cabot Corporation (Civil
Action No. 98-352) and Rodel, Inc. and Rodel Holdings, Inc.
v. Cabot Corporation (Civil Action No. 99-256), had related to
certain  aspects  of  our  slurry  business  and  had  been  controlled
by  us,  but  had  been  between  Rodel  and  our  former  parent,
Cabot Corporation. Under the settlement, the suits were fully
and permanently dismissed, and neither party admits liability. In
addition,  Cabot  Microelectronics  received  from  Rodel  a  fully
paid-up, royalty free, worldwide license in all patents that were
the subject of the two suits and their foreign equivalents.

18. Earnings Per Share
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128 “Earnings
per Shares,” requires companies to provide a reconciliation of
the numerator and denominator of the basic and diluted earn-
ings  per  share  computations.  Basic  and  diluted  earnings  per
share were calculated as follows:

(In thousands, except for share
and per share amounts)

Numerator:

Income available to 
common shares

Denominator:

Weighted average 
common shares
(denominator for 
basic calculation)

Weighted average effect 
of dilutive securities:

Stock-based 

compensation

Diluted weighted aver-
age common shares
(denominator for 
diluted calculation)

Earnings per share:

Basic

Diluted

Year Ended September 30,
2002

2003

2001

$37,733

$40,685

$41,902

24,400,533

24,160,361

23,823,790

264,071

404,713

502,812

24,664,604

24,565,074

24,326,602

$ 1.55

$ 1.53

$ 1.68

$ 1.66

$ 1.76

$ 1.72

19. Financial Information by Industry Segment and 

Geographic Area

We  operate  predominantly  in  one  industry  segment—the
development, manufacture, and sale of CMP slurries.

Revenues  are  attributed  to  the  United  States  and  foreign
regions  based  upon  the  customer  location  and  not  the  geo-
graphic  location  from  which  our  products  were  shipped.
Financial information by geographic area was as follows:

Revenue:

United States
Europe
Asia

Total

Property, plant and equipment, net:

United States
Europe
Asia

Total

September 30,
2002

2003

2001

$ 79,845
24,592
147,228

$ 81,015
29,734
124,416

$ 87,049
30,583
109,560

$251,665

$235,165

$227,192

$102,771
2,248
28,676

$100,900
2,032
29,332

$ 64,171
1,943
31,312

$133,695

$132,264

$ 97,426

S E L E C T E D   Q U A RT E R LY   O P E R AT I N G   R E S U LT S

(Unaudited and in thousands, 
except per share amounts)

Revenue
Cost of goods sold

Gross profit
Operating expenses:

Sept. 30,
2003

$67,903
33,458

June 30, March 31, Dec. 31,
2002

2003

2003

$64,288
31,360

$62,201
31,786

$57,273
27,665

Sept. 30,
2002

$65,264
31,946

June 30, March 31, Dec. 31,
2001

2002

2002

$68,377
32,113

$50,520
25,262

$51,004
23,746

34,445

32,928

30,415

29,608

33,318

36,264

25,258

27,258

Research and development
Selling and marketing
General and administrative
Litigation settlement
Amortization of intangibles

Total operating expenses
Operating income
Other income (expense), net

Income before income taxes
Provision for income taxes

12,469
3,338
4,607
—
85

20,499
13,946
(111)

13,835
4,186

10,803
2,751
4,655
—
85

18,294
14,634
46

14,680
4,918

9,609
2,554
4,595
—
85

16,843
13,572
43

13,615
4,561

8,635
2,578
4,368
—
85

15,666
13,942
(5)

13,937
4,669

10,102
2,469
3,917
—
74

16,562
16,756
71

16,827
5,377

10,190
2,470
4,260
—
90

17,010
19,254
1,160

20,414
7,147

6,429
2,370
5,397
1,000
91

15,287
9,971
(151)

9,820
2,869

6,947
2,358
3,884
—
90

13,279
13,979
(317)

13,662
4,645

Net income

$ 9,649

$ 9,762

$ 9,054

$ 9,268

$11,450

$13,267

$ 6,951

$ 9,017

Basic earnings per share

$ 0.39

$ 0.40

$ 0.37

$ 0.38

$ 0.47

$ 0.55

$ 0.29

$ 0.37

Weighted average basic 
shares outstanding

24,591

24,389

24,346

24,300

24,231

24,193

24,140

24,096

Diluted earnings per share

$ 0.39

$ 0.40

$ 0.37

$ 0.38

$ 0.47

$ 0.54

$ 0.28

$ 0.37

Weighted average diluted 

shares outstanding

25,049

24,639

24,593

24,579

24,501

24,521

24,583

24,532 

33

M A N A G E M E N T   R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y

The  accompanying  consolidated  financial  statements  were  prepared  by  Cabot  Microelectronics  in  conformity  with  accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Cabot Microelectronics’ management is responsible for the integrity
of these statements and of the data, estimates and judgments that underlie them.

Cabot Microelectronics maintains a system of internal accounting controls designed to provide reasonable assurance that its assets
are safeguarded from loss or unauthorized use, that transactions are properly authorized and recorded, and that financial records
are reliable and adequate for public reporting. The standard of reasonable assurance is based on management’s judgment that the
cost of such controls should not exceed their associated benefits. The system is monitored and evaluated on an ongoing basis by
management in conjunction with its internal audit function, independent accountants, and the Audit Committee of the Board 
of Directors.

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors provides general oversight responsibility for the financial statements. Composed
entirely of Directors who are independent and not employees of Cabot Microelectronics, the Committee meets periodically with
Cabot Microelectronics’ management, internal auditors and the independent auditors to review the quality of the financial reporting
and internal controls, as well as the results of the auditing efforts. The internal auditors and independent auditors have full and
direct access to the Audit Committee, with and without management present.

William P. Noglows
Chief Executive Officer

William S. Johnson
Chief Financial Officer

Daniel S. Wobby
Principal Accounting Officer

M A R K E T   F O R   C O M PA N Y ’ S   C O M M O N   E Q U I T Y   A N D   R E L AT E D   S T O C K H O L D E R   M AT T E R S

Our common stock has traded publicly on the NASDAQ National Market(cid:2) under the symbol “CCMP” since our initial public
offering in April 2000. The following table sets forth the range of quarterly high and low closing sales prices for our common
stock on the NASDAQ National Market.

Fiscal 2002

First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter

Fiscal 2003

First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter

Fiscal 2004

First Quarter

High

Low

$81.16
86.54
68.80
49.81

61.02
55.38
52.60
67.00

$43.15
53.25
38.41
34.75

33.25
38.34
41.55
51.86

61.61

48.00

As of December 31, 2003, there were approximately 1,236 holders of record of our common stock. No dividends were declared
or paid in either fiscal 2003 or fiscal 2002 and we currently do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the future.

35

S A R B A N E S - O X L E Y   A C T   S E C T I O N   3 0 2   C E RT I F I C AT I O N S   O N   O U R   A N N U A L   R E P O RT   O N   F O R M   1 0 - K  
P R E V I O U S LY   F I L E D   W I T H   T H E   S E C

In  the  Company’s  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K  for  the  fiscal  year  ended  September  30,  2003  filed  with  the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on December 10, 2003, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer signed the
Section 302 Certifications below. These certifications are presented for informational purposes only.

I,  William  P.  Noglows,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of  Cabot
Microelectronics Corporation, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Cabot

Microelectronics Corporation;

2. Based  on  my  knowledge,  this  report  does  not  contain  any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and
other  financial  information  included  in  this  report,  fairly
present  in  all  material  respects  the  financial  condition,
results of operations and cash f lows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible
for  establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls  and
procedures  (as  defined  in  Exchange  Act  Rules  13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or
caused  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to  be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its con-
solidated  subsidiaries,  is  made  known  to  us  by  others
within  those  entities,  particularly  during  the  period  in
which this report is being prepared;

(b) (paragraph  omitted  pursuant  to  SEC  Release  Nos. 

33-8238 and 34-47986)

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure
controls  and  procedures  and  presented  in  this  report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls  and  procedures,  as  of  the  end  of  the  period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed  in  this  report  any  change  in  the  registrant’s
internal  control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred
during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect,  the  registrant’s  internal  control  over  financial
reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control
over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the
audit committee of registrant’s board of directors:

(a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves man-
agement  or  other  employees  who  have  a  significant
role  in  the  registrant’s  internal  control  over  financial
reporting.

Date: December 10, 2003

William P. Noglows
Chief Executive Officer

I,  William  S.  Johnson,  Chief  Financial  Off icer  of  Cabot
Microelectronics Corporation, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Cabot

Microelectronics Corporation;

2. Based  on  my  knowledge,  this  report  does  not  contain  any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and
other  financial  information  included  in  this  report,  fairly
present  in  all  material  respects  the  financial  condition,
results of operations and cash f lows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible
for  establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls  and
procedures  (as  defined  in  Exchange  Act  Rules  13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or
caused  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to  be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its con-
solidated  subsidiaries,  is  made  known  to  us  by  others
within  those  entities,  particularly  during  the  period  in
which this report is being prepared;

(b) (paragraph  omitted  pursuant  to  SEC  Release  Nos. 

33-8238 and 34-47986)

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure
controls  and  procedures  and  presented  in  this  report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls  and  procedures,  as  of  the  end  of  the  period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed  in  this  report  any  change  in  the  registrant’s
internal  control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred
during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect,  the  registrant’s  internal  control  over  financial
reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control
over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the
audit committee of registrant’s board of directors:

(a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves man-
agement  or  other  employees  who  have  a  significant
role  in  the  registrant’s  internal  control  over  financial
reporting.

37

Date: December 10, 2003

William S. Johnson
Chief Financial Officer

Corporate Officers

William P. Noglows
Chairman, President and 
Chief Executive Officer

H. Carol Bernstein
Vice President, Secretary and 
General Counsel

William Johnson
Vice President and 
Chief Financial Officer

Hiro Nishiya
Vice President of 
Asia Pacific Business Region

Daniel Pike
Vice President of Operations

Stephen Smith
Vice President of 
Marketing and Sales

Clifford Spiro
Vice President of 
Research and Development

Daniel Wobby
Principal Accounting Officer

C O R P O R AT E   I N F O R M AT I O N

Board of Directors

William P. Noglows
Chairman
President and Chief Executive Officer,
Cabot Microelectronics Corporation

Juan Enriquez-Cabot
Director 
Director, Life Science Project,
Harvard Business School

John Frazee, Jr.
Director 
Former Chairman and 
Chief Executive Officer,
Centel Corporation

H. Laurance Fuller
Director 
Former Co-Chairman,
BP Amoco, p.l.c.

J. Joseph King
Director 
Vice Chairman and 
Chief Executive Officer,
Molex, Inc.

Ronald Skates
Director 
Former President and 
Chief Executive Officer,
Data General Corporation

Steven Wilkinson
Director 
Former Partner,
Arthur Andersen LLP

Corporate Headquarters

Cabot Microelectronics Corporation 
870 N. Commons Drive 
Aurora, IL 60504 
(630) 375-6631

Investor Information

Investor inquiries are welcome, and
individuals are invited to contact our
offices by mail at the address above,
by telephone at (630) 499-2600 
or through our website at
www.cabotcmp.com.

Stock Information

Cabot Microelectronics is traded on
NASDAQ(cid:3) under the symbol CCMP.

Stock Transfer Agent and Registrar

EquiServe Trust Company, N.A. 
P.O. Box 43010 
Providence, RI 02940-3010 
(781) 575-3400 
www.equiserve.com

Independent Auditors

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 
Chicago, IL

Shareholder Meeting

The Annual Meeting of Shareholders
will be held at 8 a.m. on March 9,
2004 at Cabot Microelectronics
Corporation, 870 N. Commons
Drive, Aurora, IL.

Form 10-K

A copy of the Cabot Microelectronics
Annual Report on Form 10-K for 
the fiscal year ended September 30,
2003 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission is available
without charge at our website,
www.cabotcmp.com.

m
o
c
.
s
r
o
n
n
o
c
-
n
a
r
r
u
c
.
w
w
w
/

.
c
n
I

,
s
r
o
n
n
o
C
&
n
a
r
r
u
C
y
b

d
e
n
g
i
s
e
D

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
We are a world-class team of professionals that 
is capitalizing on our technical know-how, extensive
global infrastructure and strong balance sheet, 
to deliver robust performance.

Cabot Microelectronics’ Management

Daniel Pike
Vice President of Operations

Daniel Wobby
Principal Accounting Officer

Clifford Spiro
Vice President of Research and Development

William Johnson
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

William P. Noglows
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Stephen Smith
Vice President of Marketing and Sales

H. Carol Bernstein
Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel

Hiro Nishiya
Vice President of Asia Pacific Business Region

870 870 N. Commons 

Commons DrDrive

AurAurora,ora, IL IL 60504
60504
tel: 630.375.6631
630.375.6631
tel:
toll frfree:ee: 800.811.2756
800.811.2756
toll 
630.499.2666
fax:ax: 630.499.2666
.cabotcmp.com.com

wwwwww.cabotcmp

1995-AR-04