Capgemini Annual Report 2015

Plain-text annual report

Service and expertise: global commerce in motion CAI International, Inc. 2015 Annual Report At CAI we have built a different kind of global transportation company. Critical mass in intermodal containers: CAI was formed 27 years ago to provide leasing services to the shipping industry, the foundation of global trade. Over the years we have expanded services and customers. More recently, we have added assets and capabilities in railcars and built and acquired logistics expertise around the world. We focus our business to serve the needs of global trade, and the container business remains crucially important to CAI and our customers around the world. Several factors contribute to the success of our container business. First, and most important, is our global fleet—more than 1.2 million TEUs (twenty-foot equivalent units) in a diverse set of configurations designed to transport every form of shippable cargo, from raw materials to finished goods to refrigerated products. Second, our containers are strategically located around the world, managed by a global real-time equipment control system. A well-managed fleet helps us better serve our customers. And finally, we have relationships with a growing list of major companies that today includes more than 300 of the world’s preeminent shipping lines, shippers, and logistics companies. 1 CAI International, Inc. | 2015 Annual Report CAI is located where our customers need us: 18 offices around the world, agents in another eight locations, and relationships with 250+ depot facilities globally. 17944_CAI-Editorials_CS6-r1.indd 1 3/29/16 8:12 PM CAI International, Inc. | 2015 Annual Report 2 Assets are vital in the transportation business, but so is experience. Our railcar team consists of industry veterans with backgrounds in operations, finance, engineering, and marketing. 3 CAI International, Inc. | 2015 Annual Report 17944_CAI-Editorials_CS6-r1.indd 2 3/29/16 8:12 PM CAI has successfully expanded into rail, and the business is growing rapidly. Intermodal containers dominate international shipping, but on the US domestic front, rail remains a key component of freight transportation. In our container business, we transport finished goods that you will find at your retailer. On the other hand, our rail business focuses on basic industrial commodities—the building blocks of what we use for construction, for heating our homes, and as ingredients for the products we consume. To offer our customers a more complete set of transportation solutions, we launched CAI Rail in 2012. Our presence in this critical market has deepened substantially, and we now operate our own fleet of more than 5,000 railcars. Our railcar business gives us another way to serve shipping customers and diversifies our revenue stream, representing more than 10 percent of CAI’s leasing revenue and income. As with our fleet of shipping containers, our railcar fleet is diversified. We have railcars that handle various commodities and industrial products, including grain and other agricultural products, forest products, energy products, industrial goods, food, and chemicals. We own these assets and maintain them ourselves to ensure they meet customer needs in terms of capabilities and reliability. We are true railcar operators. 17944_CAI-Editorials_CS6-r1.indd 3 3/29/16 8:12 PM CAI International, Inc. | 2015 Annual Report 4 Logistics help CAI do more for more customers. The intermodal container and the railcar are fundamental components of shipping—the physical assets that carry goods from origin to destination. But there is another substantial challenge in transportation: logistics. What’s the best mode of shipment? The best equipment? The best way to handle transfers? The best way to minimize cost or maximize speed? These are the kinds of issues addressed by CAI’s logistics teams: ClearPointt in North America and CAI Logistics for global needs. We have also recently acquired Challenger Overseas, a US-based Non–Vessel Operating Common Carrier (NVOCC) that handles containerized imports and exports for its customers. Challenger will further enhance our international logistics operation. Effective logistics capabilities transcend assets with experience and expertise. We have combined our on-the-ground professionals with technology to make the best shipping decisions and track shipping progress for our customers and their global shipments. Today we have logistics professionals throughout the United States to complement our extensive network of depot facilities and agents around the world. Many of our people have concentrated experience in the challenges of shipping for a particular industry; all have extensive knowledge of logistics, and all work hard to understand the needs of our global customers. 5 CAI International, Inc. | 2015 Annual Report 17944_CAI-Editorials_CS6-r1.indd 4 3/29/16 8:12 PM Strong relationships with customers lead to better logistics solutions. Our people work hard to create lasting, valuable connections with our growing customer base. 17944_CAI-Editorials_CS6-r1.indd 5 3/29/16 8:12 PM CAI International, Inc. | 2015 Annual Report 6 Fellow Stockholders The year in review: Like many companies and industries, the challenge we faced in 2015 was one of global economic growth. Throughout most of the year, our focus remained on economic growth in China and the effect of the economic slowdown on commodity prices. Global trade, particularly in and around Asia, is an important economic driver for our company. During this past year we had to contend with lower demand for containers as well as a decline in container prices and, consequently, lease rates due to the fall in iron ore and steel prices. Historically, we have experienced a seasonal upturn in demand, typically from May through November. However, because of the slowdown around the globe, particularly in China, that seasonal increase in demand did not materialize. Our utilization decreased over the course of the year and secondary sale prices declined, particularly in the fourth quarter. In such an environment, our focus turned to increasing utilization and reducing storage-related costs. We targeted our older, off-hire assets for sale and impaired the units by $24.5 million to values we believe are reflected in the current sale market. This non-cash charge of $24.5 million (reported in our financial statements as part of depreciation expense) reflects a significant adjustment in the value of our off-hire equipment and involved approximately 10 percent of all the TEUs in our owned dry van fleet. We are actively positioning this equipment into markets where we believe we can maximize sale prices for these assets. Despite this difficult environment, the strategy we’ve pursued in recent years to diversify our business paid off in 2015. CAI managed to grow revenues by 10 percent, from $228 million in 2014, to $250 million in 2015. Net income in 2015, however, was down considerably from 2014, primarily due to the fourth quarter non-cash impairment charge of $24.5 million discussed above; CAI earned $26.8 million in 2015, down from $60.3 million in 2014. On a per share basis, CAI earned $1.28 per fully diluted share, down from the $2.85 reported in 2014. Emerging businesses: We made excellent progress on our newer businesses, CAI Rail and our two logistics brands, CAI Logistics and ClearPointt. These complementary business lines are the result of our diversification strategy that began over the last several years, and the results are promising. Of our $22 million increase in revenue in 2015, 32 percent ($7.1 million) was related to our rail business, while 52 percent ($11.5 million) came from our logistics businesses. Rail is now a significant business for CAI. We more than doubled our fleet in 2015 to over 5,000 cars, with an overall average utilization rate of 98 percent. In the fourth quarter alone, we purchased over 1,100 on-lease railcars, and we entered commitments to purchase $136 million of new railcars during the year. We expect railcars will represent approximately 20 percent of our revenue-earning assets by the end of 2016. Logistics is also a fast-growing new business for CAI. In 2014, logistics-related revenue was zero; in 2015, it totaled $11.5 million thanks to a growing team of global logistics professionals and the July 2015 acquisition of ClearPointt Logistics LLC, an intermodal logistics company based in Washington State, which primarily provides domestic intermodal rail services to its customers. We are looking for additional ways to grow this important business. In the first quarter of 2016, we acquired Challenger Overseas, an NVOCC, or Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier, which provides international logistics services. The acquisition offers an immediate additional revenue stream; more importantly, it complements and extends our logistics strategy and capabilities, as well as our asset-based businesses. 7 CAI International, Inc. | 2015 Annual Report 17944_CAI-Editorials_CS6-r1.indd 6 3/29/16 8:12 PM From a strategic point of view, 2015 was a solid year for CAI, despite some obvious challenges. To be clear, the container industry is still a very solid business for CAI. We believe that we can effectively work through this period of cyclically weak demand; the outlook for global trade remains promising in 2016 and beyond. In addition, we are pleased by the progress in our rail and logistics franchises. The past year has brought significant consolidation in the container leasing business. With this consolidation, our four largest competitors are now estimated to control approximately 70 percent of the market. We view this consolidation in a positive light. First, we remain very competitive in regards to the two major costs of incremental container investment: the purchase cost of new containers and the cost of financing. Second, we believe that with significant market share now concentrated with our top four competitors, CAI will gain market share as customers look to diversify their lease sourcing to maintain balance in their leased fleet concentrations. Furthermore, given the difficult market conditions we all face, we believe the entire industry will need to be more focused on returns, and less focused on market share, than it has been over the past several years. Our strategy of building diverse but complementary lines of business is well designed to both meet these current challenges and to provide a platform for future sustained growth. Our diversification strategy, which is already well underway, enables CAI to leverage our existing infrastructure without the need to invest in a low-return environment and gain market share as customers diversify their funding sources. Our strategy is already proving successful as we reported the highest revenue growth, the lowest growth in operating costs, and the highest pre-tax return on equity in 2015 (adjusting for the impairment charge) as compared to our public container leasing competitors. Outlook: In short, we are optimistic about our future—which is why our Board of Directors approved an increase in our share repurchase program, from one million to two million shares. The weakness in our share price represents an attractive opportunity to buy back shares as part of our commitment to enhance shareholder value. We have the resources to do this, with a strong balance sheet, strong positive cash flow, and committed credit facilities. Of course, we are always looking for opportunities to strengthen our business and build long-term shareholder value. The best way for CAI to enhance shareholder value is to stay focused on our customer mission: delivering outstanding service. We continue to work hard to help our customers meet their business goals, and we want to thank the employees of CAI around the world for their great efforts in a difficult year. We thank our shareholders for your continued confidence, and look forward to reporting on our progress in 2016 and in the years ahead. Victor Garcia Hiromitsu Ogawa President and Chief Executive Officer Chairman of the Board CAI International, Inc. | 2015 Annual Report 8 17944_CAI-Editorials_CS6-r1.indd 7 3/29/16 8:12 PM Financial Highlights* Total Revenue* Net Income* 249.7 227.6 212.4 173.9 63.5 63.9 60.3 26.8 2012 2013 2014 2015 2012 2013 2014 2015 EBITDA* 151.8 181.9 181.4 176.5 2012 2013 2014 2015 *Dollars in millions 9 CAI International, Inc. | 2015 Annual Report 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Revenue Operating Income Net Income $173.9 $212.4 $227.6 $249.7 103.1 108.8 103.6 67.4 63.5 63.9 60.3 26.8 EBITDA 151.8 176.5 181.9 181.4 17944_CAI-Editorials_CS6-r1.indd 8 3/29/16 8:12 PM Form 10-K CAI International, Inc. 2015 Annual Report 17944_10KCover_CS6-r1.indd 1 3/29/16 3:08 PM 17944_10KCover_CS6-r1.indd 2 3/29/16 3:02 PM UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (cid:2) □ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For The Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2015 or TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Transition Period from to Commission ﬁle number-001-33388 CAI International, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as speciﬁed in its charter) Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) Steuart Tower 1 Market Plaza, Suite 900 San Francisco, California (Address of principal executive office) 94-3109229 (I.R.S. Employer Identiﬁcation Number) 94105 (Zip Code) (415) 788-0100 (Registrant’s telephone number including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of exchange on which registered Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as deﬁned in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes (cid:4) No (cid:2) Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to ﬁle reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes (cid:4) No (cid:2) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has ﬁled all reports required to be ﬁled by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to ﬁle such reports), and (2) has been subject to such ﬁling requirement for the past 90 days. Yes (cid:2) No (cid:4) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such ﬁles). Yes (cid:2) No (cid:4) Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent ﬁlers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in deﬁnitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. (cid:2) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated ﬁler, an accelerated ﬁler, a non-accelerated ﬁler, or a smaller reporting company. See the deﬁnitions of ‘‘large accelerated ﬁler,’’ ‘‘accelerated ﬁler,’’ and ‘‘smaller reporting company’’ in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated ﬁler □ Non-accelerated ﬁler □ (Do not check if smaller reporting company) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as deﬁned in the Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes (cid:4) No (cid:2) As of June 30, 2015, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second ﬁscal quarter, the aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant (based upon the closing sale price of such shares on the New York Stock Exchange on June 30, 2015) was approximately $280.5 million. Shares of registrant’s common stock held by each executive officer, director and beneﬁcial holders of 10% or more of our common stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates of the registrant. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes. As of January 31, 2016, there were 19,921,739 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding. Accelerated ﬁler (cid:2) Smaller reporting company □ DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Portions of the registrant’s deﬁnitive proxy statement relating to the registrant’s 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be ﬁled no later than 120 days after the close of the registrant’s ﬁscal year ended December 31, 2015, are incorporated by reference into Part III hereof. TABLE OF CONTENTS Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 PART I Item 1. Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 1A. Risk Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 2. Item 3. Item 4. PART II Item 5. Item 6. Item 7. Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Legal Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mine Safety Disclosures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selected Financial Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 8. Item 9. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 9A. Controls and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 9B. Other Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PART III Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 11. Executive Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneﬁcial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence . . . . . Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PART IV Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SIGNATURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 11 32 33 33 33 34 36 39 55 56 56 56 60 60 60 60 60 60 61 101 i SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains certain forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, statements concerning the conditions in our industry, our operations, our economic performance and ﬁnancial condition, including, in particular, statements relating to our business and growth strategy and service development efforts. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a ‘‘safe harbor’’ for certain forward-looking statements so long as such information is identiﬁed as forward-looking and is accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the information. When used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the words ‘‘may,’’ ‘‘might,’’ ‘‘should,’’ ‘‘estimate,’’ ‘‘project,’’ ‘‘plan,’’ ‘‘anticipate,’’ ‘‘expect,’’ ‘‘intend,’’ ‘‘outlook,’’ ‘‘believe’’ and other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements and information. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of their dates. These forward-looking statements are based on estimates and assumptions by our management that, although we believe to be reasonable, are inherently uncertain and subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties include, without limitation, those identiﬁed under the caption Item 1A. ‘‘Risk Factors’’ in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in all our other ﬁlings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as otherwise required by law. Reference is also made to such risks and uncertainties detailed from time to time in our ﬁlings with the SEC. Unless the context requires otherwise, references to ‘‘CAI,’’ the ‘‘Company,’’ ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ or ‘‘our’’ in this Annual Report on Form 10-K refer to CAI International, Inc. and its subsidiaries. ii PART I ITEM 1. BUSINESS Our Company We are one of the world’s leading transportation ﬁnance and logistics companies. We purchase equipment, primarily intermodal shipping containers and railcars, which we lease to our customers. We also manage equipment for third-party investors. In operating our ﬂeet, we lease, re-lease and dispose of equipment and contract for the repair, repositioning and storage of equipment. We also provide domestic and international logistics services. The following table shows the composition of our equipment ﬂeet as of December 31, 2015 and our average utilization for the year ended December 31, 2015: Owned container ﬂeet in TEUs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Managed container ﬂeet in TEUs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total container ﬂeet in TEUs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Owned container ﬂeet in CEUs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Managed container ﬂeet in CEUs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total container ﬂeet in CEUs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Owned railcar ﬂeet in units As of December 31, 2015 984,085 198,093 1,182,178 1,029,117 177,958 1,207,075 5,096 Average container ﬂeet utilization in TEUs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average container ﬂeet utilization in CEUs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average railcar ﬂeet utilization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Percent of Total Fleet 83% 17% 100% 85% 15% 100% 100% Year Ended December 31, 2015 91.8% 92.5% 96.6% The intermodal marine container industry-standard measurement unit is the 20-foot equivalent unit, or TEU, which compares the size of a container to a standard 20-foot container. For example, a 20-foot container is equivalent to one TEU and a 40-foot container is equivalent to two TEUs. Containers can also be measured in cost equivalent units (CEUs), whereby the cost of each type of container is expressed as a ratio relative to the cost of a standard 20-foot dry van container. For example, the CEU ratio for a standard 40-foot dry van container is 1.6, and a 40-foot high cube container is 1.7. Utilization of containers is computed by dividing the average total units on lease during the period, in CEUs or TEUs, by the total CEUs or TEUs in our container ﬂeet. Utilization of railcars is computed by dividing the average number of railcars on lease during the period by the total number of railcars in our ﬂeet. In both cases, the total ﬂeet excludes new units not yet leased and off-hire units designated for sale. Our revenue consists of container lease income and rail lease income from our owned container and railcar ﬂeets, management fee income for managing containers for third-party investors and logistics revenue for the provision of logistics services. Substantially all of our revenue is denominated in U.S. dollars. For the year ended December 31, 2015, we recorded revenue of $249.7 million and net income attributable to CAI common stockholders of $26.8 million. A comparison of our 2015 ﬁnancial results with those of the prior years can be found in Item 6 ‘‘Selected Financial Data’’ of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We earn our revenue primarily from intermodal containers which are deployed by our customers in a wide variety of global trade routes. Virtually all of our containers are used internationally and no container is domiciled in one particular place for a prolonged period of time. As such, substantially all of our container assets are considered to be international with no single country of use. Our railcars are used by lessees on railroads in North America. 1 History We were founded in 1989 by our Chairman, Hiromitsu Ogawa, as a traditional container leasing company that leased containers owned by us to container shipping lines. We were originally incorporated under the name Container Applications International, Inc. in the State of Nevada in August 1989. In February 2007, we were reincorporated under our present name in the State of Delaware. In December 2011, we formed CAI Rail Inc. (CAI Rail), as a wholly-owned subsidiary of CAI International, Inc. CAI Rail was formed to purchase and lease-out a ﬂeet of railcars in North America. In July 2015, we purchased ClearPointt Logistics LLC (ClearPointt), a U.S.-based intermodal logistics company focused on the domestic intermodal market, for approximately $4.1 million. The Company is headquartered in Everett, Washington. In February 2016, we purchased Challenger Overseas, LLC (Challenger), a New Jersey based Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier (NVOCC) for approximately $10.8 million. Corporate Information Our corporate headquarters and principal executive offices are located at Steuart Tower, 1 Market Plaza, Suite 900, San Francisco, California 94105. Our telephone number is (415) 788-0100 and our website address is http://www.capps.com. We operate our business in 17 offices in 13 countries including the United States, and have agents in Asia, Europe, South Africa, and South America. Our wholly-owned international subsidiaries are located in the United Kingdom, Japan, Malaysia, Sweden, Germany, Singapore, Luxembourg, Australia, Barbados and Bermuda. We also own 80% of CAIJ, Inc., which is an investment manager for third-party investors in Japan. Segment Information We organize our business by the nature of services we provide which includes equipment leasing, equipment management and logistics. Previously, we operated in only one industry and reportable segment, equipment leasing, and therefore did not disclose separate segments. Due to the growth of CAI Rail and the acquisition of ClearPointt during 2015, we now separate our business into three reportable segments, container leasing, rail leasing and logistics. The operating results of each segment and details of our revenues for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, and information regarding the geographic areas in which we do business is summarized in Note 17 to our consolidated ﬁnancial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Industry Overview Container Leasing We operate in the worldwide intermodal freight container leasing industry. Intermodal freight containers, or containers, are large, standardized steel boxes used to transport cargo by a number of means, including ship, truck and rail. Container shipping lines use containers as the primary means for packaging and transporting freight internationally, principally from export-oriented economies in Asia to other Asian countries, North America and Western Europe. Containers are built in accordance with standard dimensions and weight speciﬁcations established by the International Standards Organization (ISO). Standard dry van containers are eight feet wide, either 20 or 40 feet long and are either 8 feet 6 inches or 9 feet 6 inches tall. The two principal categories of containers are described as follows: • Dry van containers. A dry van container is constructed of steel sides, roof and end panel with a set of doors on the other end, a wooden ﬂoor and a steel undercarriage. Dry van containers are the least expensive and most commonly used type of container. According to Container Census, 2015 — Survey and Forecast of Global Container Units, published by Drewry Maritime Research, dry van containers comprised approximately 89.2% of the worldwide container ﬂeet, as measured in TEUs, as of the end of 2014. They are used to carry general cargo, such as manufactured component parts, consumer staples, electronics and apparel. 2 • Specialized equipment. Specialized equipment includes open-top, ﬂat-rack, palletwide, swapbody and refrigerated containers, roll trailers, and generator sets. An open-top container is similar in construction to a dry van container except that the roof is replaced with a tarpaulin supported by removable roof bows. A ﬂat-rack container is a heavily reinforced steel platform with a wood deck and steel end panels. Open-top and ﬂat-rack containers are generally used to move heavy or oversized cargo, such as marble slabs, building products or machinery. Palletwide containers are a type of dry-van container externally similar to ISO standard containers, but internally about two inches wider so as to accommodate two European-sized pallets side-by-side. Swapbody containers are a type of dry van container designed to be easily transferred between rail, truck, and barge and are equipped with legs under their frames. A refrigerated container has an integrated refrigeration unit on one end which plugs into a generator set or other outside power source and is used to transport perishable goods. Roll trailers are a type of ﬂat-bed trailer equipped with rubber wheels underneath for terminal haulage and stowage on board roll-on/roll-off vessels. According to Container Census, 2015 — Survey and Forecast of Global Container Units, published by Drewry Maritime Research, specialized containers comprised approximately 10.8% of the worldwide container ﬂeet, as measured in TEUs, as of the end of 2014. Containers provide a secure and cost-effective method of transportation because they can be used in multiple modes of transportation, making it possible to move cargo from a point of origin to a ﬁnal destination without repeated unpacking and repacking. As a result, containers reduce transit time and freight and labor costs as they permit faster loading and unloading of shipping vessels and more efficient utilization of transportation containers than traditional bulk shipping methods. The protection provided by containers also reduces damage, loss and theft of cargo during shipment. While the useful economic life of containers varies based upon the damage and normal wear and tear suffered by the container, we estimate that the average useful economic life of a dry van container used in our ﬂeet is 13.0 years. Container shipping lines own and lease containers for their use. The Container Census, 2015 — Survey and Forecast of Global Container Units, published by Drewry Maritime Research, estimates that as of the end of 2014, transportation companies (including container shipping lines and freight forwarders), owned approximately 52.6% of the total worldwide container ﬂeet and container leasing companies owned approximately 47.4% of the total worldwide container ﬂeet based on TEUs. Given the uncertainty and variability of export volumes and the fact that container shipping lines have difficulty in accurately forecasting their container requirements at different ports, the availability of containers for lease signiﬁcantly reduces a container shipping line’s need to purchase and maintain excess container inventory. In addition, container leases allow the container shipping lines to adjust their container ﬂeets both seasonally and over time and help to balance trade ﬂows. The ﬂexibility offered by container leasing helps container shipping lines improve their overall ﬂeet management and provides the container shipping lines with an alternative source of ﬁnancing. Fleet Overview. The table below summarizes the composition of our container ﬂeet as of December 31, 2015 by type of equipment: Owned container ﬂeet in TEUs . . . . . Managed container ﬂeet in TEUs . . . Total container ﬂeet in TEUs . . . . . . Owned container ﬂeet in CEUs . . . . Managed container ﬂeet in CEUs . . . Total container ﬂeet in CEUs . . . . . . Dry Van Containers 881,745 195,715 1,077,460 Dry Van Containers 786,271 174,022 960,293 Percent of Total Fleet Specialized Equipment 74% 102,340 2,378 17% 91% 104,718 Percent of Total Fleet Specialized Equipment 65% 242,846 15% 3,936 80% 246,782 Percent of Total Fleet Total Percent of Total Fleet 9% 984,085 0% 198,093 9% 1,182,178 83% 17% 100% Percent of Total Fleet Total Percent of Total Fleet 20% 1,029,117 0% 177,958 20% 1,207,075 85% 15% 100% 3 Management Services Overview. We manage containers for third-party investors under management agreements that cover portfolios of containers. We lease, re-lease and dispose of the containers and contract for their repair, repositioning and storage. Our management agreements have multiple year terms and provide that we receive a management fee based upon the actual net operating income for each container, which is equal to the actual rental revenue for a container less the actual operating expenses directly attributable to that container. Management fees are collected monthly or quarterly, depending upon the agreement, and generally are not paid if net operating revenue is zero or less for a particular period. If operating expenses exceed revenue, third-party investors are required to pay the excess or we may deduct the excess, including our management fee, from future net operating revenue. Under these agreements, we also receive a commission for selling or otherwise disposing of containers for the third-party investor. Our management agreements generally require us to indemnify the third-party investor for liabilities or losses arising out of a breach of our obligations. In return, the third-party investor typically indemniﬁes us in our capacity as the manager of the container against a breach by the third-party investor, sales taxes on commencement of the arrangement, withholding taxes on payments to the third-party investor under the management agreement and any other taxes, other than our income taxes, incurred with respect to the containers that are not otherwise included as operating expenses deductible from revenue. Marketing and Operations Overview. Our marketing and operations personnel are responsible for developing and maintaining relationships with our lessees, facilitating lease contracts and maintaining the day-to-day coordination of operational issues. This coordination allows us to negotiate lease contracts that satisfy both our ﬁnancial return requirements and our lessees’ operating needs. It also facilitates our awareness of lessees’ potential equipment shortages and their awareness of our available equipment inventories. We have marketing and operations employees in ten countries, supported by independent agents in a further eight countries. Leases Overview. To meet the needs of our lessees and achieve a favorable utilization rate, we lease containers under three main types of leases: • • Long-Term Leases. Our long-term leases have terms of one year or more and specify the number of containers to be leased, the pick-up and drop-off locations, the applicable per diem rate and the contract term. We typically enter into long-term leases for a ﬁxed term ranging from three to eight years, with ﬁve-year term leases being most common. Our long-term leases generally require our lessees to maintain all units on lease for the duration of the lease, which provides us with scheduled lease payments. A small percentage of our long-term leases contain an early termination option and afford the lessee interchangeability of containers, and the ability to redeliver containers if the lessee’s ﬂeet requirements change. Generally, leases with an early termination provision impose various economic penalties to the customer if the customer elects to exercise the early termination provision. Short-Term Leases. Short-term leases include both master interchange leases and customized short-term leases. Master interchange leases provide a master framework pursuant to which lessees can lease containers on an as-needed basis, and thus command a higher per diem rate than long-term leases. The terms of master interchange leases are typically negotiated on an annual basis. Under our master interchange leases, lessees know in advance their per diem rates and drop-off locations, subject to monthly port limits. We also enter into other short-term leases that typically have a term of less than one year and are generally used for one-way leasing, typically for small quantities of containers. The terms of short-term leases are customized for the speciﬁc requirements of the lessee. Short-term leases are sometimes used to reposition containers to high-demand locations and accordingly may contain terms that provide incentives to lessees. 4 • Finance Leases. Finance leases provide our lessees with an alternative method to ﬁnance their container acquisitions. Finance leases are long-term in nature and require relatively little customer service attention. They ordinarily require ﬁxed payments over a deﬁned period and generally provide lessees with a right to purchase the leased containers for a nominal amount at the end of the lease term. Per diem rates under ﬁnance leases include an element of repayment of capital and, therefore, typically are higher than per diem rates charged under long-term leases. Finance leases require the container lessee to keep the container on lease for the entire term of the lease. The following table provides a summary of our container ﬂeet by lease type as of December 31, 2015: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term leases Short-term leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Finance leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . As of December 31, 2015 TEUs CEUs 73% 19% 8% 100% 74% 17% 9% 100% Our lease agreements contain general terms and conditions detailing standard rights and obligations, including requirements that lessees pay a per diem rate, depot charges, taxes and other charges when due, maintain equipment in good condition, return equipment in good condition in accordance with return conditions set forth in the lease agreement, use equipment in compliance with all applicable laws, and pay us for the value of the equipment as determined by the lease agreement if the equipment is lost or destroyed. A default clause in our lease agreements gives us certain legal remedies in the event that an equipment lessee is in breach of lease terms. Our lease agreements contain an exclusion of warranties clause and require lessees to defend and indemnify us in most instances from third-party claims arising out of the lessee’s use, operation, possession or lease of the equipment. Lessees are required to maintain physical damage and comprehensive general liability insurance and to indemnify us against loss with respect to the equipment. We also maintain our own contingent physical damage and third-party liability insurance that covers our equipment during both on-lease and off-lease periods. All of our insurance coverage is subject to annual deductible provisions and per occurrence and aggregate limits. Re-leasing, Logistics Management and Depot Management. We believe that managing the period after lease termination, in particular after our containers’ ﬁrst lease, is one of the most important aspects of our business. Successful management of this period requires disciplined re-leasing capabilities, logistics management and depot management. • Re-leasing. Since our leases (other than ﬁnance leases) allow our lessees to return their containers, we typically lease a container several times during their useful life. New containers can usually be leased with a limited marketing and customer service infrastructure because initial leases for new containers typically cover large volumes of units and are fairly standardized transactions. Used containers, on the other hand, are typically leased in smaller transactions that are structured to accommodate pick-ups and returns in a variety of locations. Our utilization rates depend on our re-leasing abilities. Factors that affect our ability to re-lease used containers include the size of our lessee base, ability to anticipate lessee needs, our presence in relevant geographic locations and the level of service we provide our lessees. We believe that our global presence and long-standing relationships with more than 320 container lessees as of December 31, 2015 provide us an advantage over our smaller competitors in re-leasing our containers. 5 • • Logistics Management. The shipping industry is characterized by large regional trade imbalances, with loaded containers generally ﬂowing from export-oriented economies in Asia to other Asian countries, North America and Western Europe. Because of these trade imbalances, container shipping lines have an incentive to return leased containers in relatively low export areas to reduce the cost of shipping empty containers. We have managed this structural imbalance of inventories with the following approach: • • • • • Limiting or prohibiting container returns to low-demand areas. repositioning costs, our leases typically include a list of the speciﬁc locations to which containers may be returned, limitations on the number of containers that may be returned to low-demand locations, high drop-off charges for returning containers to low-demand locations or a combination of these provisions; In order to minimize our Taking advantage of the secondary resale market. proﬁle, we have aggressively sold older containers when they are returned to low demand areas; In order to maintain a younger ﬂeet age Developing country-speciﬁc leasing markets to utilize older containers in the portable storage market. In North America and Western Europe, we lease on a limited basis older containers for use as portable storage; Seeking one-way lease opportunities to move containers from lower demand locations to higher demand locations. One-way leases may include incentives, such as free days, credits and damage waivers. The cost of offering these incentives is considerably less than the cost we would incur if we paid to reposition the containers; and Paying to reposition our containers to higher demand locations. At locations where our inventories remain high, despite the efforts described above, we will selectively choose to ship excess containers to locations with higher demand. Depot Management. As of December 31, 2015, we managed our equipment ﬂeet through 254 independent equipment depot facilities located in 46 countries. Depot facilities are generally responsible for repairing containers when they are returned by lessees and for storing the containers while they are off-hire. Our operations group is responsible for managing our depot contracts and periodically visiting depot facilities to conduct inventory and repair audits. We also supplement our internal operations group with the use of independent inspection agents. As of December 31, 2015, a majority of our off-lease inventory was located at depots that are able to report notices of container activity and damage detail via electronic data interchange, or EDI. Most of the depot agency agreements follow a standard form and generally provide that the depot will be liable for loss or damage of containers and, in the event of loss or damage, will pay us the previously agreed loss value of the applicable containers. The agreements require the depots to maintain insurance against container loss or damage and we carry insurance to cover the risk that a depot’s insurance proves insufficient. Our container repair standards and processes are generally managed in accordance with standards and procedures speciﬁed by the Institute of International Container Lessors, or the IICL. The IICL establishes and documents the acceptable interchange condition for containers and the repair procedures required to return damaged containers in acceptable interchange condition. When containers are returned by lessees, the depot arranges an inspection of the containers to assess the repairs required to return the containers to acceptable IICL condition. As part of the inspection process, damages are categorized either as lessee damage or normal wear and tear. Items typically designated as lessee damage include dents in the container, while items such as rust are typically designated as normal wear and tear. In general, lessees are responsible for the lessee damage portion of repair costs and we are responsible for normal wear and tear. 6 Customer Concentration. Revenue from our ten largest container lessees represented 58.7% of container leasing revenue for the year ended December 31, 2015, with revenue from our single largest lessee, CMA CGM, accounting for 13.1% of container leasing revenue, or $29.0 million. This $29.0 million of revenue represented 11.6% of our total revenue for this period. Proprietary Real-time Information Technology System. Our proprietary real-time information technology system tracks all of our containers individually by container number, provides design speciﬁcations for the containers, tracks on-lease and off-lease transactions, matches each on-lease unit to a lease contract and each off-lease unit to a depot contract, maintains the major terms for each lease contract, tracks accumulated depreciation, calculates the monthly bill for each container lessee and tracks and bills for container repairs. Most of our depot activity is reported electronically, which enables us to prepare container lessee bills and calculate ﬁnancial reporting information more efficiently. In addition, our system allows our lessees to conduct business with us through the Internet. This allows our lessees to review our container inventories, monitor their on-lease information, view design speciﬁcations and receive information on maintenance and repair. Many of our lessees receive billing and on-and off-lease information from us electronically. Our Suppliers. We purchase most of our containers in China from manufacturers that have met our qualiﬁcation requirements. We are currently not dependent on any single manufacturer. We have long-standing relationships with all of our major container suppliers. Our technical services personnel review the designs for our containers and periodically audit the production facilities of our suppliers. In addition, we contract with independent third-party inspectors to monitor production at factories while our containers are being produced. This provides an additional layer of quality control and helps ensure that our containers are produced in accordance with our speciﬁcations. Our Competition. We compete primarily with other container leasing companies, including both larger and smaller lessors. We also compete with bank leasing companies offering long-term operating leases and ﬁnance leases, and container shipping lines, which sometimes lease their excess container inventory. Other participants in the shipping industry, such as container manufacturers, may also decide to enter the container leasing business. It is common for container shipping lines to utilize several leasing companies to meet their container needs and to minimize reliance on any one individual leasing company. Our competitors compete with us in many ways, including pricing, lease ﬂexibility, supply reliability, customer service and the quality and condition of containers. Some of our competitors have greater ﬁnancial resources than we do, or are affiliates of larger companies. We emphasize the quality of our ﬂeet, supply reliability and high level of customer service to our container lessees. We focus on ensuring adequate container availability in high-demand locations, dedicate large portions of our organization to building relationships with lessees, maintain close day-to-day coordination with lessees and have developed a proprietary information technology system that allows our lessees to access real-time information about their containers. Seasonality. We have historically experienced increased seasonal demand for containers in the second and third quarters of the year. However, equipment rental revenue may ﬂuctuate signiﬁcantly in future periods based upon the level of demand by container shipping lines for leased containers, our ability to maintain a high utilization rate of containers in our total ﬂeet, changes in per diem rates for leases and ﬂuctuations in operating expenses. Rail Leasing Fleet Overview. We own a ﬂeet of railcars of various types including: 50ft and 60ft box cars for paper and forest products; covered hoppers for grain, cement, sand, plastic pellets and many other industrial products; general purpose tank cars that are used to transport food-grade and other non-hazardous commodities; gondolas for coal; and general service ﬂat cars. We owned 5,096 railcars as of December 31, 2015. 7 In June 2015 we entered into a multi-year railcar order (the ‘‘Agreement’’) with a railcar manufacturer. Under the Agreement, we have committed to purchase 2,000 railcars of various types for use on the North American rail system. The speciﬁc type and quantity of railcars will be conﬁrmed during the term of the Agreement, but the total investment is expected to be in excess of $200 million. The Agreement contains a delivery schedule that allows for the delivery of railcars in 2016, 2017 and 2018. The Agreement also includes various other provisions that detail the individual prices for the railcars, adjustments to purchase prices, warranties, car types, car speciﬁcations and limitations of liability. In January 2016 we committed to the purchase of 300 additional railcars for a cost of $25 million. We expect delivery of these cars in the second and third quarters of 2016. Overview of Our Leases. We offer multiple lease options to our railcar customers, including full service leases, net operating leases and per diem leases. Our full service leases provide our customers with comprehensive management services including maintenance and the payment of taxes. Net operating leases allow customers to manage and pay the cost of operating and maintaining railcars themselves. Our per diem lease product enables customers to pay through a settlement process on an hourly and mileage basis. Customer Concentration. Our railcar customers are typically industrial companies who ship their products or raw materials by rail. We lease to a number of different industries and no customer generates more than 10% of our total monthly revenue. Our customers are generally large, creditworthy, industrial companies. Additionally, we work with a number of North American Class I Railroads and regional carriers. Our Competition. We function in a highly competitive marketplace that includes large and small operating lessors, ﬁnancial institutions with passive leasing enterprises, captive leasing companies owned by manufacturers and at times with shippers holding large and diverse ﬂeets of railcars. We compete on the basis of customer relationships, lease rate, maintenance expertise, service capability and availability of railcars. Logistics Overview of Our Services. We offer comprehensive intermodal, truck brokerage and logistics services through ClearPointt and our own logistics business. Through our network of transportation carriers and equipment providers, we arrange for the movement of our customers’ freight. We contract with railroads to provide transportation for the line-haul portion of the shipment and with local trucking companies, known as ‘‘drayage companies,’’ for pickup and delivery. We may also offer use of our own CAI equipment for domestic beneﬁcial cargo owner (BCO) movements. As part of our intermodal and truck brokerage services, we negotiate and bundle rates for our customers, track shipments in transit, and handle claims for freight loss or damage on behalf of our customers. With our recent acquisition of Challenger, we are now able to provide international export and import services for full container loads, less than container loads, perishable cargo, project cargo, and airfreight across the globe. We also have a network of logistics professionals dedicated to developing, implementing and operating customized logistics solutions. We offer a wide range of transportation management services and technology solutions including shipment optimization, load consolidation, mode selection, carrier management, load planning and execution and web-based shipment visibility. Customer Concentration. We provide services to customers in a wide variety of industries, including consumer products, retail and durable goods. Revenue from our ten largest customers represented 61.9% of logistics revenue for the year ended December 31, 2015, with revenue from our largest and second largest customers accounting for 22.2% and 13.0% of logistics revenue, respectively, or $2.6 million and $1.5 million, respectively. Our Competition. The transportation services industry is highly competitive. We compete against other logistics companies, third party brokers, and asset-backed trucking companies that market their own intermodal services. Several large trucking companies have entered into agreements with railroads to market intermodal services nationwide. Competition is based primarily on freight rates, quality of services, reliability, transit time and scope of operations. 8 Relationship with Railroads. A key element of our business strategy is to strengthen our close working relationship with the major intermodal railroads in the United States. Due to our size and relative importance, some railroads have dedicated support personnel to focus on our day-to-day service requirements. We have relationships with all seven of the Class 1 freight railroads, and our senior executives meet with each of the railroads on a regular basis to discuss major strategic issues concerning intermodal transportation. Transportation rates are market driven. We sometimes negotiate with the railroads or other major service providers on a route or customer speciﬁc basis. Consistent with industry practice, some of the rates we negotiate are special commodity quotations (‘‘SCQs’’), which provide discounts from published price lists based on competitive market factors and are designed by the railroads or major service providers to attract new business or to retain existing business. SCQ rates are generally issued for the account of a single IMC. SCQ rates apply to speciﬁc customers in speciﬁed shipping lanes for a speciﬁc period of time, usually up to 12 months. Relationship with Drayage Companies. We have a ‘‘Quality Drayage Program,’’ under which participants commit to provide high quality drayage service along with clean and safe equipment, maintain a deﬁned on-time performance level and follow speciﬁed procedures designed to minimize freight loss and damage. We negotiate drayage rates for transportation between speciﬁc origin and destination points. Relationship with Trucking Companies. Our truck brokerage operation has a large number of active trucking companies that we use to transport freight. Our corporate headquarters handles the administrative and regulatory aspects of the trucking company relationship. Our relationships with these trucking companies are important since these relationships determine pricing, load coverage and overall service. Risk Management and Insurance. We require all drayage companies participating in our Quality Drayage Program to carry general liability insurance, truckman’s auto liability insurance and cargo insurance. Railroads, which are self-insured, provide limited cargo protection per shipment. To cover freight loss or damage when a carrier’s liability cannot be established or a carrier’s insurance is insufficient to cover the claim, we carry our own cargo insurance. Credit Control We provide services for container shipping lines, freight forwarders, railroads and other companies that meet our credit criteria. Our credit policy sets different maximum exposure limits depending on our relationship and previous experience with each equipment lessee. Credit criteria may include, but are not limited to, trade route, country, social and political climate, assessments of net worth, asset ownership, bank and trade credit references, credit bureau reports, including those from Dynamar, operational history and ﬁnancial strength. We monitor our customers’ performance on an ongoing basis. Our credit control processes are aided by the long payment experience we have with most of our customers, our broad network of relationships that provide current information about our customers’ market reputations and our focus on collections. Environmental Matters We are subject to federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment, including those governing the discharge of pollutants to air and water, the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes and the cleanup of contaminated sites. We could incur substantial costs, including cleanup costs, ﬁnes and third-party claims for property or natural resource damage and personal injury, as a result of violations of environmental laws and regulations in connection with our or our lessees’ current or historical operations. Under some environmental laws in the United States and certain other countries, the owner or operator of equipment may be liable for environmental damage, cleanup or other costs in the event of a spill or discharge of material from the equipment without regard to the fault of the owner or operator. While we typically maintain liability insurance coverage and typically require our lessees to provide us with indemnity against certain losses, the insurance coverage is subject to large deductibles, limits on maximum coverage and signiﬁcant exclusions and may not be sufficient or available to protect against any or all liabilities and such indemnities may not cover or be sufficient to protect us against losses arising from environmental damage. 9 Regulation We are subject to regulations promulgated in various countries, including the United States, seeking to protect the integrity of international commerce and prevent the use of equipment for international terrorism or other illicit activities. For example, the Container Security Initiative, the Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism and Operation Safe Commerce are among the programs administered by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security that are designed to enhance security for cargo moving throughout the international transportation system by identifying existing vulnerabilities in the supply chain and developing improved methods for ensuring the security of containerized cargo entering and leaving the United States. Moreover, the International Convention for Safe Containers, 1972, as amended, adopted by the International Maritime Organization, applies to new and existing containers and seeks to maintain a high level of safety of human life in the transport and handling of containers by providing uniform international safety regulations. As these regulations develop and change, we may incur increased compliance costs due to the acquisition of new, compliant equipment and/or the adaptation of existing equipment to meet new requirements imposed by such regulations. Our logistics business is licensed by the Department of Transportation as brokers in arranging for the transportation of general commodities by motor vehicle. To the extent that we perform truck brokerage services, we do so under these licenses. The Department of Transportation prescribes qualiﬁcations for acting in this capacity, including a surety bond that we have posted. To date, compliance with these regulations has not had a material adverse effect on our results of operations or ﬁnancial condition. However, the transportation industry is subject to legislative or regulatory changes that can affect the economics of the industry by requiring changes in operating practices or inﬂuencing the demand for, and cost of providing, transportation services. Employees As of December 31, 2015, we had 128 employees worldwide. We are not a party to any collective bargaining agreements. We believe that relations with our employees are good. Available Information Our Internet website address is http://www.capps.com. Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports ﬁled or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act) are available free of charge through our website as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically ﬁled with, or furnished to, the SEC. Also, copies of our ﬁlings with the SEC will be made available, free of charge, upon written request to the Company. 10 ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS In addition to the other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we have identiﬁed the following risks and uncertainties that may have a material adverse effect on our business, ﬁnancial condition, results of operations and cash ﬂows. Investors should carefully consider the risks described below before making an investment decision. The risks described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks not presently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial may also impair our business operations. Our business could be harmed by any of these risks. The trading price of our common stock could decline due to any of these risks and investors may lose all or part of their investment. This section should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated ﬁnancial statements and related notes thereto, and ‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations’’ contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Risks Related to Container Leasing Market conditions are very weak due to a combination of factors, including signiﬁcant declines in steel prices, new container prices, used container prices and slower trade growth which has led to much lower demand for containers, and this decline in market conditions has accelerated in the fourth quarter of 2015 and into 2016. Market conditions are unusually weak and such weakness is accelerating due to a combination of factors which have signiﬁcantly reduced our proﬁtability. There has been an overall decline in worldwide commodity prices, and in particular, steel prices, which have declined approximately 40% from October 2014 through December 2015. Quarter to quarter world containerized trade growth decelerated signiﬁcantly during 2015 as compared to the respective quarterly periods of 2014. The decline in steel prices, along with slower trade growth that has resulted in a reduced demand for containers, has contributed to a signiﬁcant decline in the price of new containers, which along with low interest rates, has resulted in market lease rates reaching historically low levels. In addition, we have a large number of historically high rate leases that are expiring from 2016 through 2020 and those that have expired or been renegotiated have been re-priced at today’s historically low lease rates. Used equipment is being sold at substantially lower prices, resulting in losses on the sale of equipment. All of the above factors are contributing to the pressure on our proﬁtability and these current conditions are expected to continue in the short-term. If these trends continue, our proﬁtability will decline further, which could limit the availability of our liquidity and capital resources and therefore constrain our ability to invest in additional containers or repurchase our common shares. Container leasing demand can be negatively affected by numerous market factors as well as external political and economic events that are beyond our control. Decreasing leasing demand could have a material adverse effect on our business, ﬁnancial condition, results of operations and cash ﬂows. Demand for containers depends largely on the rate of world trade and economic growth. Demand for leased containers is also driven by our customers’ ‘‘lease vs. buy’’ decisions. Cyclical recessions can negatively affect lessors’ operating results because during economic downturns or periods of reduced trade, shipping lines tend to lease fewer containers, or lease containers only at reduced rates, and tend to rely more on their own ﬂeets to satisfy a greater percentage of their requirements. As a result, during periods of weak global economic activity, container lessors like ourselves typically experience decreased leasing demand, decreased equipment utilization, lower average rental rates, decreased leasing revenue, decreased used container resale prices and signiﬁcantly decreased proﬁtability. These effects can be severe. For example, our proﬁtability decreased signiﬁcantly from the third quarter of 2008 to the third quarter of 2009 due to the effects of the global ﬁnancial crisis, and proﬁtability would have decreased further if trade activity did not start to recover at the end of 2009. In 2015, our operating performance and proﬁtability was also negatively impacted due to slower global trade growth resulting in reduced demand for leased containers, decreasing utilization, decreases in lease rental revenue, decreased used container sales prices, and higher operating costs. These conditions have continued, and to some degree accelerated, in the fourth quarter of 2015 and the ﬁrst month of 2016. If these trends continue, our proﬁtability will be negatively affected, which could constrain our ability to invest in additional containers or repurchase our common shares. 11 Other general factors affecting demand for leased containers, container utilization and per diem rental rates include: • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • available supply and prices of new and used containers; changes in the operating efficiency of our customers; economic conditions and competitive pressures in the shipping industry; shifting trends and patterns of cargo traffic, including a reduction in exports from Asian nations or increased trade imbalances; the availability and terms of container ﬁnancing; ﬂuctuations in interest rates and foreign currency values; overcapacity or undercapacity of the container manufacturers; the lead times required to purchase containers; the number of containers purchased by competitors and container lessees; container ship ﬂeet overcapacity or undercapacity; increased repositioning by container shipping lines of their own empty containers to higher-demand locations in lieu of leasing containers from us; consolidation or withdrawal of individual container lessees in the container shipping industry; import/export tariffs and restrictions; customs procedures, foreign exchange controls and other governmental regulations; natural disasters that are severe enough to affect local and global economies; political and economic factors; currency exchange rates; and future regulations which could restrict our current business practices and increase our cost of doing business. All of these factors are inherently unpredictable and beyond our control. These factors will vary over time, often quickly and unpredictably, and any change in one or more of these factors may have a material adverse effect on our business, ﬁnancial condition, results of operations and cash ﬂows. Many of these factors also inﬂuence decisions by our customers to lease or buy containers. Should one or more of these factors inﬂuence our customers to buy a larger percentage of the containers they operate, our utilization rate would decrease, resulting in decreased revenue and increased storage and repositioning costs. Lease rates may still decrease further due to a decrease in new container prices, weak leasing demand, increased competition or other factors, resulting in reduced revenues, lower margins, and reduced proﬁtability and cash ﬂows. Market leasing rates are typically a function of, among other things, new equipment prices (which are heavily inﬂuenced by steel prices), interest rates, the type and length of the lease, the equipment supply and demand balance at a particular time and location, and other factors more fully described below. A decrease in leasing rates can have a materially adverse effect on our leasing revenues, proﬁtability and cash ﬂow. 12 A decrease in market leasing rates negatively impacts the leasing rates on both new container investments and the existing containers in our ﬂeet. Most of our existing containers are on operating leases, which means that the lease term is shorter than the expected life of the container, so the lease rate we receive for the container is subject to change at the expiration of the current lease. Lower new container prices, widespread availability of attractively priced ﬁnancing, and aggressive competition for new leasing transactions continue to pressure market lease rates, and market lease rates are currently signiﬁcantly below our portfolio average. As a result, during periods of low market lease rates, including the present period, the average lease rate received for our containers is negatively impacted by both the addition of new containers at low lease rates as well as, and more signiﬁcantly by, the turnover of existing containers from leases with higher lease rates to leases with lower lease rates. Sustained reduction in the prices of new containers could harm our business, results of operations and ﬁnancial condition. If the downturn in new container prices is sustained, the per diem lease rates of older, off-lease containers would also be expected to decrease and the prices obtained for containers sold at the end of their useful life would also be expected to decrease. Since the beginning of 2013, due primarily to decreases in steel prices and other macro-economic factors outside of our control, new container pricing and the sale prices of containers sold at the end of their useful life have declined. If the reduction in the price of new containers is sustained or continues to decline such that the market per diem lease rate or resale value for all containers is reduced further, our revenue and income could decline. A continuation of these factors could harm our business, ﬁnancial condition, results of operations and cash ﬂows, even if this sustained reduction in price would allow us to purchase new containers at a lower cost. We face risks associated with re-leasing containers after their initial long term lease. Containers used in our ﬂeet have an average useful economic life that is generally between 12 and 15 years. When we purchase newly manufactured containers, we typically lease them out under long-term leases with terms of 3 to 8 years at a lease rate that is correlated to the price paid for the container. As containers leased under term leases are not leased out for their full economic life, we face risks associated with re-leasing containers after their initial long term lease at a rate that continues to provide a reasonable economic return based on the initial purchase price of the container. If prevailing container lease rates decline signiﬁcantly between the time a container is initially leased out and when its initial long term lease expires, or if overall demand for containers declines, we may be unable to earn a sufficient lease rate from the re-leasing of containers when their initial term leases expire. This could adversely affect our business, ﬁnancial condition, results of operations and cash ﬂows. The demand for leased containers is particularly tied to international trade. If international trade were to decrease, it could reduce demand for container leasing, which would materially adversely affect our business, ﬁnancial condition and results of operations. A substantial portion of our containers are used in trade involving goods being shipped from exporting countries (e.g., China and other Asian countries) to importing countries (e.g., the United States or European nations). The willingness and ability of international consumers to purchase foreign goods is dependent upon political support for an absence of government-imposed barriers to international trade in goods and services. For example, international consumer demand for foreign goods is related to price; if the price differential between foreign goods and domestically-produced goods were to decrease due to increased tariffs on foreign goods, strengthening in the applicable foreign currencies relative to domestic currencies, rising foreign wages, increasing input or energy costs or other factors, then demand for foreign goods could decrease, which in turn could result in reduced demand for container leasing. A similar reduction in demand for container leasing could result from an increased use of quotas or other technical barriers to restrict trade. The current regime of relatively free trade may not continue, which would materially adversely affect our business, ﬁnancial condition and results of operations. 13 Our customers may decide to lease fewer containers. Should shipping lines decide to buy a larger percentage of the containers they operate, our utilization rate and level of investment would decrease, resulting in decreased leasing revenues, increased storage costs, increased repositioning costs and lower growth. We, like other suppliers of leased containers, are dependent upon decisions by shipping lines to lease rather than buy their container equipment. Should shipping lines decide to buy a larger percentage of the containers they operate, our utilization rate would decrease, resulting in decreased leasing revenues, increased storage costs and increased positioning costs. A decrease in the portion of leased containers operated by shipping lines would also reduce our investment opportunities and signiﬁcantly constrain our growth. Most of the factors affecting the decisions of our customers are outside of our control. Gains and losses associated with the sale of used containers may ﬂuctuate and adversely affect our results of operations. Although our revenues primarily depend upon equipment leasing, our proﬁtability is also affected by the gains or losses we realize on the sale of used containers because, in the ordinary course of our business, we sell certain containers when they are returned to us. The volatility of the selling prices and gains or losses from the disposal of such equipment may be signiﬁcant. Used container selling prices, which can vary substantially, depend upon, among other factors, the cost of new containers, the global supply and demand balance for containers, the location of the containers, the supply and demand balance for used containers at a particular location, the repair condition of the container, refurbishment needs, materials and labor costs and equipment obsolescence. Most of these factors are outside of our control. Containers are typically sold if it is in our best interest to do so, after taking into consideration earnings prospects, book value, remaining useful life, repair condition, suitability for leasing or other uses and the prevailing local sales price for containers. Gains or losses on the disposition of used containers will ﬂuctuate and may be signiﬁcant if we sell large quantities of used containers. Used container selling prices and the gains or losses that we have recognized from selling used containers have varied widely over the last ﬁfteen years. Selling prices for used containers and our disposal gains were exceptionally high from 2010 to 2012 due to a generally tight global supply and demand balance for containers. Since the beginning of 2013, due primarily to decreases in steel prices and other macro-economic factors outside of our control, new container pricing and the sale prices of containers sold at the end of their useful life have declined. As a result, our disposal gains have decreased since the beginning of 2013. Disposal prices are close to, and in many cases below, our current residual values, which has resulted in losses being recognized on the sale of used equipment in 2015. We also incurred a charge of $24.5 million in 2015 to impair the carrying value of certain off-lease equipment. If used container prices decrease further from current levels, losses on the sale of used containers could increase, our residuals may need to be reduced, resulting in increased depreciation expense, and we may incur additional asset impairment charges, and increased depreciation expense. A continued decline in these factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, ﬁnancial condition, results of operations and cash ﬂows. We may incur signiﬁcant costs to reposition containers. When lessees return containers to locations where supply exceeds demand, we may make a decision to reposition containers to higher demand areas rather than sell the container and realize a loss on that sale. Repositioning expenses vary depending on geographic location, distance, freight rates and other factors, and may not be fully covered by drop-off charges collected from the last lessee of the containers or pick-up charges paid by the new lessee. We seek to limit the number of units that can be returned and impose surcharges on containers returned to areas where demand for such containers is not expected to be strong. However, market conditions may not enable us to continue such practices. In addition, we may not accurately anticipate which port locations will be characterized by high or low demand in the future, and our current contracts will not protect us from repositioning costs if ports that we expect to be high-demand ports turn out to be low-demand ports at the time leases expire. 14 Lessee defaults may adversely affect our business, results of operations and ﬁnancial condition by decreasing revenue and increasing storage, repositioning, collection and recovery expenses. Our equipment is leased to numerous equipment lessees. Lessees are required to pay rent and indemnify us for damage to or loss of equipment. Lessees may default in paying rent and performing other obligations under their leases. A delay or diminution in amounts received under the leases (including leases on our managed equipment), or a default in the performance of maintenance or other lessee obligations under the leases could adversely affect our business, ﬁnancial condition, results of operations and cash ﬂows and our ability to make payments on our debt. Our cash ﬂows from equipment, principally equipment rental revenue, management fee revenue, gain on sale of equipment portfolios, gain on disposition of used equipment and commissions earned on the sale of equipment on behalf of equipment investors, are affected signiﬁcantly by the ability to collect payments under leases and the ability to replace cash ﬂows from terminating leases by re-leasing or selling equipment on favorable terms. All of these factors are subject to external economic conditions and the performance by lessees and service providers that are not within our control. When lessees default, we may fail to recover all of our equipment and the equipment we do recover may be returned to locations where we will not be able to quickly re-lease or sell it on commercially acceptable terms. We may have to reposition the equipment to other places where we can re-lease or sell it, which could be expensive depending on the locations and distances involved. Following repositioning, we may need to repair the equipment and pay equipment depots for storage until the equipment is re-leased. For our owned equipment these costs will directly reduce our income before taxes and for our managed equipment, lessee defaults will increase operating expenses, and thus reduce our management fee revenue. We maintain insurance to reimburse the Company and third-party investors for such customer defaults. The insurance agreements are subject to deductibles of up to $3.0 million per occurrence and have signiﬁcant exclusions and, therefore, may not be sufficient to prevent us from suffering material losses. Additionally, the increase in claims made by the Company under such insurance agreements may result in such insurance not being available to us in the future on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. We may incur additional asset impairment charges and depreciation expense. We incurred a charge of $24.5 million in 2015 to impair the carrying value of certain off-lease equipment. Additional asset impairment charges may result from the occurrence of unexpected adverse events or management decisions that impact our estimates of expected cash ﬂows generated from our long-lived assets. We review our long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. We may be required to recognize additional asset impairment charges in the future as a result of prolonged reductions in demand for speciﬁc container types, an extended weak economic environment, persistent challenging market conditions, events related to particular customers or asset type, or as a result of asset or portfolio sale decisions by management. If an asset, or group of assets, is considered to be impaired, it may also indicate that the residual value of the associated equipment type needs to be reduced. If residual values of our rental equipment are lowered, then our depreciation expense will increase, which could have an adverse impact on our business, ﬁnancial condition and results of operations. We derive a substantial portion of our revenue from a limited number of equipment lessees. The loss of, or reduction in business by, any of these equipment lessees, or a default from any large equipment lessee, could result in a signiﬁcant loss of revenue and cash ﬂow. We have derived, and believe that we will continue to derive, a signiﬁcant portion of our revenue and cash ﬂow from a limited number of equipment lessees. Revenue from our ten largest lessees represented 51.9% of total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2015, with revenue from our single largest lessee accounting for 11.6%, or $29.0 million. As our business grows, we expect the proportion of revenue generated by our larger customers to continue to increase. The loss of such a customer would have a material adverse impact on our business, ﬁnancial condition, results of operations and cash ﬂows. In addition, a default by any of our largest lessees would result in a major reduction in our leasing revenue, large repossession expenses, potentially large lost equipment charges and a material adverse impact on our performance and ﬁnancial condition. 15 Sustained Asian economic, social or political instability could reduce demand for leasing. Many of our customers are substantially dependent upon shipments of goods exported from Asia. From time to time, there have been economic disruptions, ﬁnancial turmoil, natural disasters and political instability in this region. If these events were to occur in the future, they could adversely affect our equipment lessees and the general demand for shipping and lead to reduced demand for leased equipment or otherwise adversely affect us. Currently China is transitioning from an export based economy to a domestic demand economy. Any consequent reductions in demand for leased equipment could adversely impact our business, ﬁnancial condition, results of operations and cash ﬂows. Consolidation and concentration in the container shipping industry could decrease the demand for leased containers. We primarily lease containers to container shipping lines. We estimate that container shipping lines require approximately two TEUs of available containers for every TEU of capacity on their container ships. The container shipping lines have historically relied on a large number of leased containers to satisfy their needs. Consolidation of major container shipping lines could create efficiencies and decrease the demand that container shipping lines have for leased containers because they may be able to fulﬁll a larger portion of their needs through their owned container ﬂeets. It could also create concentration of credit risk if the number of our container lessees decreases due to consolidation. Additionally, large container shipping lines with signiﬁcant resources could choose to manufacture their own containers, which would decrease their demand for leased containers and could have an adverse impact on our business, ﬁnancial condition, results of operations and cash ﬂows. Finally, decreased demand from shipping companies for leased containers could also occur due to consolidation caused by the ﬁnancial failure of container shipping companies. Changes in market price, availability or transportation costs of containers could adversely affect our ability to maintain our supply of containers. We currently purchase almost all of our containers from manufacturers based in China. If it became more expensive for us to procure containers in China or to transport these units at a low cost from China to the locations where they are needed by our container lessees because of changes in exchange rates between the U.S. Dollar and Chinese Yuan, further consolidation among container suppliers, increased tariffs imposed by the United States or other governments or for any other reason, we may have to seek alternative sources of supply. While we are not currently dependent on any single current manufacturer of our containers, we may not be able to make alternative arrangements quickly enough to meet our container needs, and the alternative arrangements may increase our costs. It may become more expensive for us to store our off-hire containers. We are dependent on third-party depot operators to repair and store our equipment in port areas throughout the world. In many of these locations the land occupied by these depots is increasingly being considered as prime real estate. Accordingly, local communities are considering increasing restrictions on depot operations which may increase their costs of operation and in some cases force depots to relocate to sites further from the port areas. Additionally, depots in prime locations may become ﬁlled to capacity based on market conditions and may refuse additional containers due to space constraints. This could require us to enter into higher-cost storage agreements with third-party depot operators in order to accommodate our customers’ turn-in requirements and could result in increased costs and expenses for us. If these changes affect a large number of our depots it could signiﬁcantly increase the cost of maintaining and storing our off-hire containers. 16 We face extensive competition in the equipment leasing industry. We may be unable to compete favorably in the highly competitive equipment leasing business. We compete with a number of major leasing companies, many smaller lessors, manufacturers of equipment, companies and ﬁnancial institutions offering ﬁnance leases, promoters of equipment ownership and leasing as a tax-efficient investment, container shipping lines, which sometimes lease their excess container stocks, and suppliers of alternative types of containers for freight transport. Some of these competitors have greater ﬁnancial resources and access to capital than we do. Additionally, some of these competitors may have large, underutilized inventories of equipment, which could lead to signiﬁcant downward pressure on per diem rates, margins and prices of equipment. Our business requires large amounts of working capital to fund our operations. We are aware that some of our competitors have had ownership changes and there has been consolidation in the industry in recent years. As a consequence, these competitors may have greater resources available to aggressively seek to expand their market share. This could include offering lease rates with which we may not be able to effectively compete. We may not be able to compete successfully against these competitors. Competition among equipment leasing companies depends upon many factors, including, among others, per diem rates; lease terms, including lease duration, drop-off restrictions and repair provisions; customer service; and the location, availability, quality and individual characteristics of equipment units. The highly competitive nature of our industry may reduce lease rates and margins and undermine our ability to maintain our current level of container utilization or achieve our growth plans. The international nature of our business exposes us to numerous risks. Our ability to enforce lessees’ obligations will be subject to applicable law in the jurisdiction in which enforcement is sought. As containers are predominantly located on international waterways, it is not possible to predict, with any degree of certainty, the jurisdictions in which enforcement proceedings may be commenced. For example, repossession from defaulting lessees may be difficult and more expensive in jurisdictions in which laws do not confer the same security interests and rights to creditors and lessors as those in the United States and in jurisdictions where recovery of containers from defaulting lessees is more cumbersome. As a result, the relative success and expedience of enforcement proceedings with respect to containers in various jurisdictions cannot be predicted. We are also subject to risks inherent in conducting business across national boundaries, any one of which could adversely impact our business. These risks include: • • • • • • • • • • • • • regional or local economic downturns; changes in governmental policy or regulation; restrictions on the transfer of funds into or out of the countries in which we operate; import and export duties and quotas; value-added tax and other sales-type taxes which could result in additional costs to us if they are not properly collected or paid; domestic and foreign customs and tariffs; international incidents; war, hostilities, terrorist attacks, piracy, or the threat of any of these events; government instability; nationalization of foreign assets; government protectionism; compliance with export controls, including those of the U.S. Department of Commerce; compliance with import procedures and controls, including those of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security; 17 • • • • • consequences from changes in tax laws, including tax laws pertaining to container investors; potential liabilities relating to foreign withholding taxes; labor or other disruptions at key ports; difficulty in staffing and managing widespread operations; and restrictions on our ability to own or operate subsidiaries, make investments or acquire new businesses in these jurisdictions. One or more of these factors could impair our current or future international operations and, as a result, harm our overall business, ﬁnancial condition, results of operations and cash ﬂows. We may incur costs associated with new security regulations, which may adversely affect our business, ﬁnancial condition and results of operations. We may be subject to regulations promulgated in various countries, including the United States, seeking to protect the integrity of international commerce and prevent the use of equipment for international terrorism or other illicit activities. For example, the Container Security Initiative, the Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism and Operation Safe Commerce are among the programs administered by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security that are designed to enhance security for cargo moving throughout the international transportation system by identifying existing vulnerabilities in the supply chain and developing improved methods for ensuring the security of containerized cargo entering and leaving the United States. Moreover, the International Convention for Safe Containers, 1972 (CSC), as amended, adopted by the International Maritime Organization, applies to new and existing containers and seeks to maintain a high level of safety of human life in the transport and handling of containers by providing uniform international safety regulations. As these regulations develop and change, we may incur compliance costs due to the acquisition of new, compliant equipment and/or the adaptation of existing equipment to meet new requirements imposed by such regulations. Additionally, certain companies are currently developing or may in the future develop products designed to enhance the security of equipment transported in international commerce. Regardless of the existence of current or future government regulations mandating the safety standards of intermodal shipping equipment, our competitors may adopt such products or our equipment lessees may require that we adopt such products. In responding to such market pressures, we may incur increased costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, ﬁnancial condition, results of operations and cash ﬂows. We operate in numerous tax jurisdictions. A taxing authority within any of these jurisdictions may challenge our operating structure which could result in additional taxes, interest and penalties that could materially impact our ﬁnancial conditions and our future ﬁnancial results. We have implemented a number of structural changes with respect to our Company and its domestic and international subsidiaries in an effort to reduce our income tax obligations in countries in which we operate. There can be no assurance that our tax structure and the amount of taxes we pay in any of these countries will not be challenged by the taxing authorities in the countries in which we operate. If the tax authorities challenge our tax positions or the amount of taxes paid for the purchase, lease or sale of equipment in each jurisdiction in which we operate, we could incur substantial expenses associated with defending our tax position as well as expenses associated with the payment of any additional taxes, penalties and interest that may be imposed on us. The payment of these amounts could have an adverse material effect on our business, ﬁnancial condition, results of operations and cash ﬂows. 18 Environmental liability may adversely affect our business and ﬁnancial condition. We are subject to federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment, including those governing the discharge of pollutants to air, ground and water, the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes and the cleanup of contaminated sites. We could incur substantial costs, including cleanup costs, ﬁnes and costs arising out of third-party claims for property or natural resource damage and personal injury, as a result of violations of or liabilities under environmental laws and regulations in connection with our or our lessees’ current or historical operations. Under some environmental laws in the United States and certain other countries, the owner or operator of a container may be liable for environmental damage, cleanup or other costs in the event of a spill or discharge of material from a container without regard to whether or not the spill or discharge was the fault of the owner or operator. While we typically maintain liability insurance and typically require lessees to provide us with indemnity against certain losses, insurance coverage may not be sufficient, or available, to protect against any or all liabilities and such indemnities may not be sufficient to protect us against losses arising from environmental damage. Moreover, our lessees may not have adequate resources, or may refuse to honor their indemnity obligations and our insurance coverage is subject to large deductibles, coverage limits and signiﬁcant exclusions. Many countries, including the United States, restrict, prohibit or otherwise regulate the use of chemical refrigerants due to their ozone depleting and global warming effects. Our refrigerated containers currently use R134A or 404A refrigerant. While R134A and 404A do not contain CFCs (which have been restricted since 1995), the European Union has instituted regulations beginning in 2011 to phase out the use of R134A in automobile air conditioning systems due to concern that the release of R134A into the atmosphere may contribute to global warming. While the European Union regulations do not currently restrict the use of R134A or 404A in refrigerated containers or trailers, it has been proposed that, beginning in 2025, R134A and 404A usage in refrigerated containers will be banned, although the ﬁnal decision has not yet been made. Further, certain manufacturers of refrigerated containers, including the largest manufacturer of cooling machines for refrigerated containers, have begun testing units that utilize alternative refrigerants, such as carbon dioxide, that may have less global warming potential than R134A and 404A. If future regulations prohibit the use or servicing of containers using R134A or 404A refrigerants, we could be forced to incur large retroﬁtting expenses. In addition, refrigerated containers that are not retroﬁtted may become difficult to lease, command lower rental rates and disposal prices, or may have to be scrapped. Also, the foam insulation in the walls of intermodal refrigerated containers requires the use of a blowing agent that contains hydrochloﬂuorcarbons (CFCs, speciﬁcally HCFC-141b). Manufacturers are in various stages of phasing out the use of this blowing agent in the manufacturing process. In accordance with the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, the continued use of HCFC-141b in manufacturing is currently permitted. The European Union (‘‘EU’’) prohibits the import and the placing on the market in the EU of intermodal containers with insulation made with HCFC-141b (‘‘EU Regulation’’). However, the European Commission has recognized that notwithstanding its regulation, under international conventions governing free movement of intermodal containers, the use of such intermodal refrigerated containers admitted into EU countries on temporary customs admission should be permitted. Each country in the EU has its own individual and different regulations to implement the EU Regulation. We have procedures in place that we believe comply with the EU and country regulations. However, if such intermodal refrigerated containers exceed their temporary customs admission period and/or their custom admissions status changes (e.g., should such container be off-hired) and such intermodal refrigerated containers are deemed placed on the market in the EU, or if our procedures are deemed not to comply with EU or a country’s regulation, we could be subject to ﬁnes and penalties. Also, if future international conventions or regulations prohibit the use or servicing of containers with foam insulation that utilized this blowing agent during the manufacturing process, we could be forced to incur large retroﬁtting expenses and those containers that are not retroﬁtted may become more difficult to lease and command lower rental rates and disposal prices. 19 An additional environmental concern affecting our operations relates to the construction materials used in our dry containers. The ﬂoors of dry containers are plywood, usually made from tropical hardwoods. Due to concerns regarding the de-forestation of tropical rain forests and climate change, many countries which have been the source of these hardwoods have implemented severe restrictions on the cutting and export of these woods. Accordingly, container manufacturers have switched a signiﬁcant portion of production to more readily available alternatives such as birch, bamboo, and other farm grown wood species. Container users are also evaluating alternative designs that would limit the amount of plywood required and are also considering possible synthetic materials to replace the plywood. These new woods or other alternatives have not proven their durability over the typical 10 to 15 year life of a dry container, and if they cannot perform as well as the hardwoods have historically, the future repair and operating costs for these containers could be signiﬁcantly higher and the useful life of the containers may be decreased. Use of counterfeit and improper refrigerant in refrigeration machines for refrigerated containers could result in irreparable damage to the refrigeration machines, death or personal injury, and materially impair the value of our refrigerated container ﬂeet. There are reports of counterfeit and improper refrigerant gas being used to service refrigeration machines. The use of this counterfeit gas has led to the explosion of several refrigeration machines within the industry. A small number of these incidents have resulted in personal injury or death and, in all cases, the counterfeit gas has led to irreparable damage to the refrigeration machines. A testing procedure has been developed and approved by the IICL to determine whether counterfeit gas has been used to service a refrigeration machine. These tests are carried out on our refrigeration machines when they are off-hired and returned to a depot. If such tests are not proven safe and effective or if the use of such counterfeit and improper refrigerant is more widespread than currently believed, the value of our refrigerated container ﬂeet and our ability to lease refrigerated containers could be materially impaired and could therefore have a material adverse effect on our business, ﬁnancial condition, results of operations and cash ﬂows. We may face litigation involving our management of equipment for third-party investors. We manage equipment for third-party investors under management agreements that are negotiated with each third-party investor. We make no assurances to third-party investors that they will make any amount of proﬁt on their investment or that our management activities will result in any particular level of income or return of their initial capital. Although our management agreements contain contractual protections and indemnities that are designed to limit our exposure to litigation relating to these investments, such provisions may not be effective and we may be subject to a signiﬁcant loss in a successful litigation by a third-party investor. Our 80 percent ownership in CAIJ, Inc., a container investment arranger and advisor focused on arranging container investments with Japanese investors, may subject us to material litigation risks and damage to our professional reputation as a result of litigation allegations and negative publicity. CAIJ, Inc. (CAIJ) was formed and began operation in 2007 for the purpose of arranging investments in our containers with Japanese investors. CAIJ has arranged a signiﬁcant amount of investments and we expect that CAIJ will arrange more container investments in the future. Because we are the seller and manager of the containers that will be sold to investors on whose behalf CAIJ acts as an arranger and advisor, there is an inherent conﬂict of interest between us, CAIJ and the investors. We disclose this inherent conﬂict of interest to third-party investors prior to any sale to them, but we do not provide them with any assurances that they will realize a speciﬁc or any investment return on the containers purchased from, and managed by, us. In the event that these third-party investors realize losses on their investments or believe that the returns on their investments are lower than expected, they may make claims, including bringing lawsuits, against CAIJ or us for our alleged failure to act in their best interests or make appropriate disclosures to them. Any such claims could result in the payment of legal expenses and damages and also damage our reputation with third-party investors and potential third-party investors and materially and adversely affect our business, ﬁnancial condition, results of operations and cash ﬂows. 20 Certain liens may arise on our equipment. Depot operators, repairmen and transporters may come into possession of our equipment from time to time and have sums due to them from lessees or sub-lessees of equipment. In the event of nonpayment of those charges by lessees or sub-lessees, we may be delayed in, or entirely barred from, repossessing equipment, or be required to make payments or incur expenses to discharge liens on our equipment. The lack of an international title registry for containers increases the risk of ownership disputes. There is no internationally recognized system of recordation or ﬁling to evidence our title to containers nor is there an internationally recognized system for ﬁling security interests in containers. Although we have not incurred material problems with respect to this lack of an internationally recognized system, the lack of an international title recordation system for containers could result in disputes with lessees, end-users, or third parties who may improperly claim ownership of the containers. Risks Related to Railcar Leasing Weak economic conditions, ﬁnancial market volatility, and other factors may decrease customer demand for our assets and services and negatively impact our business and results of operations. We rely on continued demand from our customers to lease our railcars. Demand for railcars depends on the markets for our customers’ products and services and the strength and growth of their businesses. Some of our customers operate in cyclical markets, such as the steel, chemical, and construction industries, which are susceptible to macroeconomic downturns and may experience signiﬁcant changes in demand over time. Weakness in certain sectors of the economy in the United States and other parts of the world may make it more difficult for us to lease certain types of railcars that are either returned at the end of a lease term or returned as a result of a customer bankruptcy or default. In many cases, demand for our assets also depends on our customers’ desire to lease, rather than buy, the assets. Tax and accounting considerations, interest rates, and operational ﬂexibility, among other factors, may inﬂuence a customer’s decision to lease or buy assets. We have no control over these external considerations, and changes in these factors, including potential changes to lease accounting rules, could negatively impact demand for our assets held for lease. Additional factors, such as changes in harvest or production volumes, changes in supply chains, choices in types of transportation assets, availability of substitutes and other operational needs may also inﬂuence customer demand for our assets. Signiﬁcant declines in customer demand for our assets and services could adversely affect our ﬁnancial performance. We may be unable to maintain assets on lease at satisfactory rates. Our proﬁtability depends on our ability to lease railcars at satisfactory rates, sell railcars, and to re-lease railcars upon lease expiration. Circumstances such as economic downturns, changes in customer behavior, excess capacity in particular railcar types or generally in the marketplace, or other changes in supply or demand can adversely affect asset utilization rates and lease rates. Economic uncertainty or a decline in customer demand for our railcars could cause customers to request shorter lease terms and lower lease rates, which may result in a decrease in our asset utilization rate and reduced revenues. Alternatively, customers may seek to lock-in relatively low lease rates for longer terms, which may result in an adverse impact on current or future revenues. 21 Our rail operations are subject to various laws, rules, and regulations. If these laws, rules, and regulations change or we fail to comply with them, it could have a signiﬁcant negative effect on our business and proﬁtability. Our rail operations are subject to various laws, rules, and regulations administered by authorities in jurisdictions where we do business. In the United States, our railcar ﬂeet is subject to safety, operations, maintenance, and mechanical standards, rules, and regulations enforced by various federal and state agencies and industry organizations, including the U.S. Department of Transportation, the Federal Railroad Administration, and the Association of American Railroads. State agencies regulate some health and safety matters related to rail operations not otherwise preempted by federal law. Our business and railcar ﬂeet may be adversely impacted by new rules or regulations, or changes to existing rules or regulations, which could require additional maintenance or substantial modiﬁcation or refurbishment of our railcars, or could make certain types of railcars inoperable or obsolete or require them to be phased out prior to the end of their useful lives. In addition, violations of these rules and regulations can result in substantial ﬁnes and penalties, including potential limitations on operations or forfeitures of assets. Our access to newly built railcars may be limited, and long-term railcar purchase commitments could subject us to material operational and ﬁnancial risks. Our ability to acquire newly built railcars could be limited if we are unable to acquire railcars from manufacturers on competitive terms. In order to obtain committed access to a supply of newly built railcars on competitive terms, we sometimes enter into long-term supply agreements with manufacturers to purchase signiﬁcant numbers of newly built railcars over a multi-year period. In many cases, we cannot cancel or materially reduce our orders under these purchase commitments. Therefore, if economic conditions weaken during the term of a long-term supply agreement, it is possible that we may be required to continue to accept delivery of, and pay for, new railcars at times when it may be difficult for us to lease such railcars and our ﬁnancing costs may be high, which could negatively affect our revenues and proﬁtability. A signiﬁcant and sustained decrease in the price of crude oil and related products could reduce customer demand for our railcars. Demand for railcars that are used to transport commodities used in drilling operations, including frac sand, is dependent on the demand for these commodities. Sustained low oil prices could cause oil producers to curtail the drilling of new wells or cease production at certain existing wells that are uneconomical to operate at current crude price levels. Reduced oil drilling activity could result in decreased demand for our railcars used to transport the commodities used in drilling operations, such as frac sand. We may incur future asset impairment charges. We review long-lived assets for impairment regularly, or when circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset or investment may not be recoverable. Among other circumstances, the following may change our estimates of the cash ﬂows we expect our long-lived assets or joint venture investments will generate, which could require us to recognize asset impairment charges: • • • • a weak economic environment or challenging market conditions; new laws, rules or regulations affecting our assets, or changes to existing laws, rules or regulations; events related to particular customers or asset types; and asset portfolio sale decisions by management. 22 Our assets may become obsolete. In addition to changes in laws, rules, and regulations that may make assets obsolete, changes in the preferred method our customers use to ship their products, changes in demand for particular products, or a shift by customers toward purchasing assets rather than leasing them may adversely impact us. Our customers’ industries are driven by dynamic market forces and trends, which are inﬂuenced by economic and political factors. Changes in our customers’ markets may signiﬁcantly affect demand for our rail assets. A reduction in customer demand or change in customers’ preferred method of product transportation could result in the economic obsolescence of the assets leased by those customers. Competition could result in decreased proﬁtability. We operate in a highly competitive business environment. In certain cases, our competitors are larger than we are and have greater ﬁnancial resources, higher credit ratings, and a lower cost of capital. In addition, we compete against railcar manufacturers that have leasing subsidiaries. These factors may enable our competitors to offer leases to customers at lower rates than we can provide, thus negatively impacting our proﬁtability, asset utilization and investment volume. Risk Related to Logistics Because we depend on railroads for our operations, our operating results and ﬁnancial condition are likely to be adversely affected by any reduction or deterioration in rail service. We depend on the major railroads in the United States for virtually all of the intermodal services we provide. In many markets, rail service is limited to one or a few railroads. Consequently, a reduction in, or elimination of, rail service to a particular market is likely to adversely affect our ability to provide intermodal transportation services to some of our customers. In addition, the railroads are relatively free to adjust shipping rates up or down as market conditions permit. Rate increases would result in higher intermodal transportation costs, reducing the attractiveness of intermodal transportation compared to truck or other transportation modes, which could cause a decrease in demand for our services. Further, our ability to continue to expand our intermodal transportation business is dependent upon the railroads’ ability to increase capacity for intermodal freight and provide consistent and reliable service. Our business could also be adversely affected by a work stoppage at one or more railroads or by adverse weather conditions or other factors that hinder the railroads’ ability to provide reliable transportation services. In the past, there have been service issues when railroads have merged. As a result, we cannot predict what effect, if any, further consolidations among railroads may have on intermodal transportation services or our results of operations. Because our relationships with the major railroads are critical to our ability to provide intermodal transportation services, our business may be adversely affected by any change to those relationships. We have important relationships with certain major U.S. railroads. To date, the railroads have chosen to rely on us, other Intermodal Marketing Companies (IMCs) and other intermodal competitors to market their intermodal services rather than fully developing their own marketing capabilities. If one or more of the major railroads were to decide to reduce their dependence on us, the volume of intermodal shipments we arrange would likely decline, which could adversely affect our results of operations and ﬁnancial condition. Because we rely on drayage companies in our intermodal operations, our ability to expand our business or maintain our proﬁtability may be adversely affected by a shortage of drivers and drayage capacity. In certain markets we serve, we use third-party drayage companies for pickup and delivery of some or all of our intermodal containers. Most drayage companies operate relatively small ﬂeets and have limited access to capital for ﬂeet expansion. In some of our markets, there are a limited number of drayage companies that can meet our quality standards. This could limit our ability to expand our intermodal business or require us to establish more of our own drayage operations in some markets, which could increase our operating costs and could adversely affect our proﬁtability and ﬁnancial condition. Also, the trucking industry chronically experiences a shortage of available drivers, which may limit the ability of third-party drayage companies to expand their ﬂeets. This shortage also may require them to increase drivers’ compensation, thereby increasing our cost of providing drayage services to our customers. Therefore, the driver shortage could also adversely affect our proﬁtability and limit our ability to expand our intermodal business. 23 Because we depend on trucking companies for our truck brokerage services, our ability to maintain or expand our truck brokerage business may be adversely affected by a shortage of trucking capacity. We depend upon various third-party trucking companies for the transportation of our customers’ loads. Particularly during periods of economic expansion, trucking companies may be unable to expand their ﬂeets due to capital constraints or chronic driver shortages, and these trucking companies also may raise their rates. If we face insufficient capacity among our third-party trucking companies, we may be unable to maintain or expand our truck brokerage business. Also, we may be unable to pass rate increases on to our customers, which could adversely affect our proﬁtability. Our results of operations are susceptible to changes in general economic conditions and cyclical ﬂuctuations. Economic recession, customers’ business cycles, changes in fuel prices and supply, interest rate ﬂuctuations, increases in fuel or energy taxes and other general economic factors affect the demand for transportation services and the operating costs of railroads, trucking companies and drayage companies. We have little or no control over any of these factors or their effects on the transportation industry. Increases in the operating costs of railroads, trucking companies or drayage companies can be expected to result in higher freight rates. Our operating margins could be adversely affected if we were unable to pass through to our customers the full amount of higher freight rates. Economic recession or a downturn in customers’ business cycles also may have an adverse effect on our results of operations and growth by reducing demand for our services. Therefore, our results of operations, like the entire freight transportation industry, are cyclical and subject to signiﬁcant period-to-period ﬂuctuations. Relatively small increases in our transportation costs that we are unable to pass through to our customers are likely to have a signiﬁcant effect on our gross margin and operating income. Because transportation costs represent such a signiﬁcant portion of our costs, even relatively small increases in these transportation costs, if we are unable to pass them through to our customers, are likely to have a signiﬁcant effect on our gross margin and operating income. The transportation industry is subject to government regulation, and regulatory changes could have a material adverse effect on our operating results or ﬁnancial condition. We are licensed by the Department of Transportation as freight brokers. The Department of Transportation prescribes qualiﬁcations for acting in this capacity, including surety bond requirements. As freight brokers, we may become subject to new or more restrictive regulations relating to new laws and regulations speciﬁc to legal liability, such as motor carriers are today. Future laws and regulations may be more stringent and require changes in operating practices, inﬂuence the demand for transportation services or increase the cost of providing transportation services, any of which could adversely affect our business and results of operations. We are not able to accurately predict how new governmental laws and regulations, or changes to existing laws and regulations, will affect the transportation industry generally, or us in particular. Although government regulation that affects us and our competitors may simply result in higher costs that can be passed along to customers, that may not be the case. Our operations may be subject to various environmental laws and regulations, the violation of which could result in substantial ﬁnes or penalties. From time to time, we arrange for the movement of hazardous materials at the request of our customers. As a result, we may be subject to various environmental laws and regulations relating to the handling of hazardous materials. If we are involved in a spill or other accident involving hazardous materials, or if we are found to be in violation of applicable laws or regulations, we could be subject to substantial ﬁnes or penalties and to civil and criminal liability, any of which could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations. 24 We derive a signiﬁcant portion of our logistics revenue from our largest customers and the loss of several of these customers could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and business. Revenue from our ten largest customers represented 61.9% of logistics revenue for the year ended December 31, 2015, with revenue from our single largest customer accounting for 22.2%, or $2.6 million, and our second largest customer accounting for 13.0%, or $1.5 million. A reduction in or termination of our services by such customers could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and business. An economic downturn could materially adversely affect our business. Our operations and performance depend signiﬁcantly on economic conditions. Uncertainty about global economic conditions poses a risk as consumers and businesses may postpone spending in response to tighter credit, negative ﬁnancial news and/or declines in income, which could have a material negative effect on demand for transportation services. We are unable to predict the likely duration and severity of disruptions in the ﬁnancial markets and the adverse global economic conditions, and if the current uncertainty continues or economic conditions further deteriorate, our business and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Other factors that could inﬂuence demand include ﬂuctuations in fuel costs, labor costs, consumer conﬁdence, and other macroeconomic factors affecting consumer spending behavior. There could be a number of follow-on effects from a credit crisis on our business, including the insolvency of key transportation providers and the inability of our customers to obtain credit to ﬁnance development and/or manufacture products resulting in a decreased demand for transportation services. Our revenues and gross margins are dependent upon this demand, and if demand for transportation services declines, our revenues and gross margins could be adversely affected. General Business Risks Our level of indebtedness reduces our ﬁnancial ﬂexibility and could impede our ability to operate. We have a signiﬁcant amount of indebtedness and we intend to borrow additional amounts under our credit facilities to purchase equipment and make acquisitions and other investments. We expect that we will maintain a signiﬁcant amount of indebtedness on an ongoing basis. As of December 31, 2015, our total outstanding debt (including capital lease obligations) was $1,431.6 million. Interest expense on such debt will be $8.0 million per quarter for 2016, assuming ﬂoating interest rates remain consistent with those as of December 31, 2015. There is no assurance that we will be able to reﬁnance our outstanding indebtedness when it becomes due, or, if reﬁnancing is available, that it can be obtained on terms that we can afford. Some of our credit facilities require us to pay a variable rate of interest, which will increase or decrease based on variations in certain ﬁnancial indexes, and ﬂuctuations in interest rates can signiﬁcantly decrease our proﬁts. We do not have any hedge or similar contracts that would protect us against changes in interest rates. The amount of our indebtedness could have important consequences for us, including the following: • • • • • requiring us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash ﬂow from operations to make payments on our debt, thereby reducing funds available for operations, future business opportunities and other purposes; limiting our ﬂexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate; making it more difficult for us to satisfy our debt obligations, and any failure to comply with such obligations, including ﬁnancial and other restrictive covenants, could result in an event of default under the agreements governing such indebtedness, which could lead to, among other things, an acceleration of our indebtedness or foreclosure on the assets securing our indebtedness, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, ﬁnancial condition, results of operations and cash ﬂows; making it difficult for us to pay dividends on, or repurchase, our common stock; placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors having less debt; 25 • • limiting our ability to borrow additional funds, or to sell assets to raise funds, if needed, for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other purposes; and increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions, including changes in interest rates. We may not generate sufficient cash ﬂow from operations to service and repay our debt and related obligations and have sufficient funds left over to achieve or sustain proﬁtability in our operations, meet our working capital and capital expenditure needs or compete successfully in our industry. We will require a signiﬁcant amount of cash to service and repay our outstanding indebtedness and our ability to generate cash depends on many factors beyond our control. Our ability to make payments on and repay our indebtedness and to fund planned capital expenditures will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future. As of December 31, 2015, our total outstanding debt (including capital lease obligations) was $1,431.6 million. Interest expense on such debt will be $8.0 million per quarter in 2016, assuming ﬂoating interest rates remain consistent with those at December 31, 2015. These amounts will increase to the extent we borrow additional funds. It is possible that: • • • our business will not generate sufficient cash ﬂow from operations to service and repay our debt and to fund working capital requirements and planned capital expenditures; future borrowings will not be available under our current or future credit facilities in an amount sufficient to enable us to reﬁnance our debt; or we will not be able to reﬁnance any of our debt on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Our credit facilities impose, and the terms of any future indebtedness may impose, signiﬁcant operating, ﬁnancial and other restrictions on us and our subsidiaries. Restrictions imposed by our credit facilities or other indebtedness will limit or prohibit, among other things, our ability to: • • • • • • • • • incur additional indebtedness; pay dividends on or redeem or repurchase our stock; enter into new lines of business; issue capital stock of our subsidiaries; make loans and certain types of investments; create liens; sell certain assets or merge with or into other companies; enter into certain transactions with stockholders and affiliates; and restrict dividends, distributions or other payments from our subsidiaries. These restrictions could adversely affect our ability to ﬁnance our future operations or capital needs and pursue available business opportunities. A breach of any of these restrictions, including a breach of ﬁnancial covenants, could result in a default in respect of the related indebtedness. If a default occurs, the relevant lenders could elect to declare the indebtedness, together with accrued interest and fees, to be immediately due and payable and proceed against any collateral securing that indebtedness, which would constitute substantially all of our equipment assets. 26 Actual or threatened terrorist attacks, efforts to combat terrorism, or the outbreak of war and hostilities could negatively impact our operations and proﬁtability and may expose us to liability. Terrorist attacks and the threat of such attacks have contributed to economic instability in the United States and elsewhere, and further acts or threats of terrorism, violence, war or hostilities could similarly affect world trade and the industries in which we and our customers operate. In addition, terrorist attacks or hostilities may directly impact ports, depots, our facilities or those of our suppliers or customers, and could impact our sales and our supply chain. A severe disruption to the worldwide ports system and ﬂow of goods could result in a reduction in the level of international trade and lower demand for our equipment or services. Any of these events could also negatively affect the economy and consumer conﬁdence, which could cause a downturn in the transportation industry. The consequence of any terrorist attacks or hostilities are unpredictable, and we may not be able to foresee events that could have an adverse effect on our operations. It is also possible that one of our containers could be involved in a terrorist attack. Although our lease agreements require our lessees to indemnify us against all damages arising out of the use of our containers, and we carry insurance to potentially offset any costs in the event that our customer indemniﬁcations prove to be insufficient, our insurance does not cover certain types of terrorist attacks, and we may not be fully protected from liability of the reputational damage that could arise from a terrorist attack which utilizes one of our containers. Our operations could be affected by natural or man-made events in the locations in which we or our customers or suppliers operate. We have operations in locations subject to severe weather conditions, natural disasters, the outbreak of contagious disease, or man-made incidents such as chemical explosions, any of which could disrupt our operations. In addition, our suppliers and customers also have operations in such locations. For example, in 2011, the northern region of Japan experienced a severe earthquake followed by a series of tsunamis resulting in material damage to the Japanese economy. In 2015, a chemical explosion and ﬁre in the port of Tianjin, China damaged or destroyed a small number of our containers and disrupted operations in the port. Similarly, outbreaks of pandemic or contagious diseases, such as H1N1 (swine) ﬂu and the Ebola virus, could signiﬁcantly reduce the demand for international shipping or could prevent our containers from being discharged in the affected areas or in other locations after having visited the affected areas. Any future natural or man-made disasters or health concerns in the world where we have business operations could lead to disruption of the regional and global economies, which could result in a decrease in demand for leased containers. We may be affected by climate change or market or regulatory responses to climate change. Changes in laws, rules, and regulations, or actions by authorities under existing laws, rules, or regulations, to address greenhouse gas emissions and climate change could negatively impact our customers and business. For example, restrictions on emissions could signiﬁcantly increase costs for our customers whose production processes require signiﬁcant amounts of energy. Customers’ increased costs could reduce their demand to lease our assets. Potential consequences of laws, rules, or regulations addressing climate change could have an adverse effect on our ﬁnancial position, results of operations, and cash ﬂows. 27 Our business could be adversely affected by strikes or work stoppages by draymen, truckers, port workers and railroad workers. There has been labor unrest, including strikes and work stoppages, among workers at various transportation providers and in industries affecting the transportation industry, such as port workers. We could lose business due to any signiﬁcant work stoppage or slowdown and, if labor unrest results in increased rates for transportation providers such as draymen, we may not be able to pass these cost increases on to our customers. Strikes among longshoreman and clerical workers at ports in the past few years have slowed down the ports for a time, creating a major impact on the transportation industry. West coast longshoremen have been operating without a union contract since the summer of 2014, and a risk of labor unrest and labor slowdowns continues although the parties recently reached a tentative agreement that still must be approved by the union membership. Work stoppages occurring among owner-operators in a speciﬁc market have increased our operating costs periodically over the past several years. In the past several years, there have been strikes involving railroad workers. Future strikes by railroad workers in the United States, Canada or anywhere else that our customers’ freight travels by railroad would impact our operations. Any signiﬁcant work stoppage, slowdown or other disruption involving ports, railroads, truckers or draymen could adversely affect our business and results of operations. Our senior executives are critical to the success of our business and our inability to retain them or recruit new personnel could adversely affect our business. Most of our senior executives and other management-level employees have over ﬁfteen years of industry experience. We rely on this knowledge and experience in our strategic planning and in our day-to-day business operations. Our success depends in large part upon our ability to retain our senior management, the loss of one or more of whom could have a material adverse effect on our business, ﬁnancial condition, results of operations and cash ﬂows. Our success also depends on our ability to retain our experienced sales force and technical personnel as well as recruiting new skilled sales, marketing and technical personnel. Competition for these individuals in our industry is intense and we may not be able to successfully recruit, train or retain qualiﬁed personnel. If we fail to retain and recruit the necessary personnel, our business and our ability to obtain new equipment lessees and provide acceptable levels of customer service could suffer. We rely on our information technology systems to conduct our business. If these systems fail to adequately perform their functions, or if we experience an interruption in their operation, our business, results of operations and ﬁnancial prospects could be adversely affected. The efficient operation of our business is highly dependent on our information technology systems. We rely on our systems to track transactions, such as repair and depot charges and changes to book value, and movements associated with each of our owned or managed equipment units. We use the information provided by our systems in our day-to-day business decisions in order to effectively manage our lease portfolio and improve customer service. We also rely on them for the accurate tracking of the performance of our managed ﬂeet for each third-party investor, and the tracking and billing of logistics moves. The failure of our systems to perform as we expect could disrupt our business, adversely affect our ﬁnancial condition, results of operations and cash ﬂows and cause our relationships with lessees and third-party investors to suffer. In addition, our information technology systems are vulnerable to damage or interruption from circumstances beyond our control, including ﬁre, natural disasters, power loss and computer systems failures, unauthorized breach and viruses. Any such interruption could have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation, results of operations and ﬁnancial prospects. As a U.S. corporation, we are subject to U.S. Executive Orders and U.S. Treasury Sanctions Regulations regarding doing business in or with certain nations and specially designated nationals. As a U.S. corporation, we are subject to U.S. Executive Orders and U.S. Treasury Sanctions Regulations restricting or prohibiting business dealings in or with certain nations and with certain specially designated nationals (individuals and legal entities). Any determination that we have violated such Executive Orders and U.S. Treasury Sanctions Regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business, ﬁnancial condition, results of operations and cash ﬂows. 28 As a U.S. corporation, we are subject to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and a determination that we violated this act may affect our business and operations adversely. As a U.S. corporation, we are subject to the regulations imposed by the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), which generally prohibits U.S. companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or keeping business. Any determination that we have violated the FCPA could have a material adverse effect on our business, ﬁnancial condition, results of operations and cash ﬂows. A failure to comply with export control or economic sanctions laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or ﬁnancial condition. We may be unable to ensure that our agents and/or customers comply with applicable sanctions and export control laws. We face several risks inherent in conducting our business internationally, including compliance with applicable economic sanctions laws and regulations, such as laws and regulations administered by the U.S. Department of Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (‘‘OFAC’’), the U.S. Department of State and the U.S. Department of Commerce. We must also comply with all applicable export control laws and regulations of the United States (including but not limited to the U.S. Export Administration Regulations) and other countries. Any determination of a violation or an investigation into violations of export controls or economic sanctions laws and regulations could result in signiﬁcant criminal or civil ﬁnes, penalties or other sanctions and repercussions, including reputational harm that could materially affect our business, results of operations or ﬁnancial condition. We may pursue acquisitions or joint ventures in the future that could present unforeseen integration obstacles or costs. We have pursued, and may continue to pursue, acquisitions and joint ventures in the future. Acquisitions involve a number of risks and present ﬁnancial, managerial and operational challenges, including: • • • • • potential disruption of our ongoing business and distraction of management; customer retention; difficulty integrating personnel and ﬁnancial and other systems; hiring additional management and other critical personnel; and increasing the scope, geographic diversity and complexity of our operations. In addition, we may encounter unforeseen obstacles or costs in the integration of acquired businesses. Also, the presence of one or more material liabilities of an acquired company that are unknown to us at the time of acquisition may have a material adverse effect on our business. Acquisitions or joint ventures may not be successful, and we may not realize any anticipated beneﬁts from acquisitions or joint ventures. Changes in ﬁnancial accounting standards or practices may cause adverse, unexpected ﬁnancial reporting ﬂuctuations and affect our reported operating results. GAAP is subject to interpretation by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), the SEC and various bodies formed to promulgate and interpret appropriate accounting principles. A change in accounting standards or practices can have a signiﬁcant effect on our reported results and may even affect our reporting of transactions completed before the change is effective. New accounting pronouncements and varying interpretations of accounting pronouncements have occurred and may occur in the future. Changes to existing rules or the questioning of current practices may materially adversely affect our reported ﬁnancial results or the way in which we conduct our business. 29 For example, in February 2016, the FASB issued a new accounting standards update on lease accounting that will supersede the existing lease accounting guidance. The new accounting guidance creates a model by which lessees will need to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for virtually all of their leases, with the exception of leases that meet the deﬁnition of a short-term lease. Under the new standard, extensive quantitative and qualitative disclosures will also be required to provide greater insight into the extent of revenue and expenses recognized and expected to be recognized from existing contracts. The ﬁnal lease accounting standard is expected to take effect for us in 2019. In addition, in May 2014, the FASB issued an accounting standards update on a comprehensive new revenue recognition standard that will supersede the existing revenue recognition guidance. The new accounting guidance creates a framework by which entities will allocate the transaction price to separate performance obligations and recognize revenue when each performance obligation is satisﬁed. Under the new standard, we will be required to use judgment and make estimates, including identifying performance obligations in a contract, estimating the amount of variable consideration to include in the transaction price, allocating the transaction price to each separate performance obligation and determining when performance obligations have been satisﬁed. The ﬁnal revenue recognition standard is expected to take effect for us in 2017. See ‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Recent Accounting Pronouncements.’’ Fluctuations in foreign exchange rates could reduce our proﬁtability. Most of our revenues and costs are billed in U.S. dollars. Our operations and used equipment sales in locations outside of the U.S. have some exposure to foreign currency ﬂuctuations, and trade growth and the direction of trade ﬂows can be inﬂuenced by large changes in relative currency values. In addition, most of our equipment ﬂeet is manufactured in China. Although the purchase price is in U.S. dollars, our manufacturers pay labor and other costs in the local currency, the Chinese yuan. To the extent that our manufacturers’ costs increase due to changes in the valuation of the Chinese yuan, the dollar price we pay for equipment could be affected. Adverse or large exchange rate ﬂuctuations may negatively affect our ﬁnancial condition, results of operations and cash ﬂows. Our stock price has been volatile and may remain volatile. Risks Related to our Stock The trading price of our common stock may be subject to wide ﬂuctuations in response to quarter-to-quarter variations in operating results, new products or services by us or our competitors, general conditions in the shipping industry and the intermodal equipment sales and leasing markets, changes in earnings estimates by analysts, or other events or factors which may or may not be under our control. Broad market ﬂuctuations may adversely affect the market price of our common stock. Since the initial public offering of our stock at $15.00 per share on May 16, 2007, the market price of our stock has ﬂuctuated signiﬁcantly from a high of $30.28 per share to a low of $2.12 per share through February 20, 2016. Since the trading volume on our stock is modest on a daily basis, shareholders may experience difficulties in liquidating our stock. Factors affecting the trading price of our common stock may include: • • • • • • • variations in our ﬁnancial results; changes in ﬁnancial estimates or investment recommendations by any securities analysts following our business; the public’s response to our press releases, our other public announcements and our ﬁlings with the SEC; our ability to successfully execute our business plan; changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance, interpretations or principles; future sales of common stock by us or our directors, officers or signiﬁcant stockholders or the perception such sales may occur; our ability to achieve operating results consistent with securities analysts’ projections; 30 • • • • • • the operating and stock price performance of other companies that investors may deem comparable to us; recruitment or departure of key personnel; our ability to timely address changing equipment lessee and third-party investor preferences; equipment market and industry factors; general stock market conditions; and other events or factors, including those resulting from war, incidents of terrorism or responses to such events. In addition, if the market for companies deemed similar to us or the stock market in general experiences loss of investor conﬁdence, the trading price of our common stock could decline for reasons unrelated to our business or ﬁnancial results. The trading price of our common stock might also decline in reaction to events that affect other companies in our industry even if these events do not directly affect us. Future new sales of our common stock by us or outstanding shares by existing stockholders, or the perception that there will be future sales of new shares from the Company or existing stockholders, may cause our stock price to decline and impair our ability to obtain capital through future stock offerings. A substantial number of shares of our common stock held by our current stockholders could be sold into the public market at any time. In addition, the perception of, or actual sale of, new shares by us may materially and adversely affect our stock price and could impair our ability to obtain future capital through an offering of equity securities. We do not currently pay dividends to holders of our common stock, and we cannot assure you that we will pay dividends to holders of our common stock in the future. Although our board of directors may consider a dividend policy under which we would pay cash dividends on our common stock, any determinations by us to pay cash dividends on our common stock in the future will be based primarily upon our ﬁnancial condition, results of operations, business requirements, tax considerations and our board of directors’ continuing determination that the declaration of dividends under the dividend policy are in the best interests of our stockholders and are in compliance with all laws and agreements applicable to the dividend program. In addition, the terms of our credit agreements contain provisions restricting the payment of cash dividends subject to certain exceptions. Consequently, investors may be required to rely on sales of their common stock as the only way to realize any future gains on their investment. If securities analysts do not publish research or reports about our business or if they decrease their ﬁnancial estimates or investment recommendations, the price of our stock could decline. The trading market for our common shares may rely in part on the research and reports that industry or ﬁnancial analysts publish about us or our business. We do not control or inﬂuence the decisions or opinions of these analysts and analysts may not cover us. If any analyst who covers us decreases his or her ﬁnancial estimates or investment recommendation, the price of our stock could decline. If any analyst ceases coverage of our company, we could lose visibility in the market, which in turn could cause our stock price to decline. 31 Our founder, Mr. Hiromitsu Ogawa, will continue to have substantial control over us and could act in a manner with which other stockholders may disagree or that is not necessarily in the interests of other stockholders. Based upon beneﬁcial ownership as of December 31, 2015, Mr. Ogawa beneﬁcially owns 19.3% of our outstanding common stock. As a result, he may have the ability to determine the outcome of matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, including the election of directors and any merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets. In addition, he may have the ability to control the management and affairs of our company. Mr. Ogawa may have interests that are different from yours. For example, he may support proposals and actions with which you may disagree or which are not in your interests. The concentration of ownership could delay or prevent a change in control of us or otherwise discourage a potential acquirer from attempting to obtain control of us, which in turn could reduce the price of our common stock. In addition, as Chairman of our Board of Directors, Mr. Ogawa may inﬂuence decisions to maintain our existing management and directors in office, delay or prevent changes of control of our company, or support or reject other management and board proposals that are subject to stockholder approval, such as amendments to our employee stock plans and approvals of signiﬁcant ﬁnancing transactions. Our certiﬁcate of incorporation and bylaws and Delaware law contain provisions that could discourage a third party from acquiring us and consequently decrease the market value of an investment in our common stock. Our certiﬁcate of incorporation and bylaws and Delaware corporate law each contain provisions that could delay, defer or prevent a change in control of our company or changes in our management. Among other things, these provisions: • • • • • • • • • authorize us to issue preferred stock that can be created and issued by the board of directors without prior stockholder approval, with rights senior to those of our common stock; permit removal of directors only for cause by the holders of a majority of the shares entitled to vote at the election of directors and allow only the directors to ﬁll a vacancy on the board of directors; prohibit stockholders from calling special meetings of stockholders; prohibit stockholder action by written consent, thereby requiring all stockholder actions to be taken at a meeting of our stockholders; require the affirmative vote of 662⁄3% of the shares entitled to vote to amend our bylaws and certain articles of our certiﬁcate of incorporation, including articles relating to the classiﬁed board, the size of the board, removal of directors, stockholder meetings and actions by written consent; allow the authorized number of directors to be changed only by resolution of the board of directors; establish advance notice requirements for submitting nominations for election to the board of directors and for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at a meeting; classify our board of directors into three classes so that only a portion of our directors are elected each year; and allow our directors to amend our bylaws. These provisions could discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for our stockholders to elect directors and take other corporate actions, which may prevent a change of control or changes in our management that a stockholder might consider favorable. In addition, Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of us. Any delay or prevention of a change in control or change in management that stockholders might otherwise consider to be favorable could cause the market price of our common stock to decline. ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS None. 32 ITEM 2. PROPERTIES Offıce Locations. As of December 31, 2015, we operated our business in 17 offices in 13 different countries including the U.S. We have three offices in the U.S. including our headquarters in San Francisco, California. We have 14 offices outside the U.S., including offices operated by third-party corporate service providers in Bermuda and Luxembourg. In addition, we have agents in Asia, Europe, South Africa, and South America. Our headquarters is used for our container leasing, rail leasing and logistics segments. Each one of our other offices is used for our container leasing segment, with the exception of our office in Everett, Washington which is used only for our logistics segment operations. All of our offices, except those operated by third party corporate service providers, are leased. The following table summarizes our office locations as of December 31, 2015: Office Locations — U.S. San Francisco, CA (Headquarters) Charleston, SC Everett, WA Office Locations — International Brentwood, United Kingdom St. Michael, Barbados Antwerp, Belgium Hong Kong Singapore Delmenhorst, Germany Hamburg, Germany Tokyo, Japan (two offices) Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Taipei, Taiwan Luxembourg Hamilton, Bermuda Sydney, Australia ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS From time to time we may become a party to litigation matters arising in connection with the normal course of our business, including in connection with enforcing our rights under our leases. While we cannot predict the outcome of these matters, in the opinion of our management, any liability arising from these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our business, ﬁnancial condition, results of operations or cash ﬂows. Nevertheless, unexpected adverse future events, such as an unforeseen development in our existing proceedings, a signiﬁcant increase in the number of new cases or changes in our current insurance arrangements could result in liabilities that have a material adverse impact on our business, ﬁnancial condition, results of operations or cash ﬂows. We are currently not party to any material legal proceedings which are material to our business, ﬁnancial condition, results of operations or cash ﬂows. ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES Not applicable. 33 PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES Our common stock is traded on the NYSE under the symbol ‘‘CAI.’’ The following table reﬂects the range of high and low sales prices of our common stock, as reported on the NYSE in each quarter of the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014: 2015: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fourth Quarter Third Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Second Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . First Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fourth Quarter Third Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Second Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . First Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . High Low $ 12.36 $ 20.87 $ 25.54 $ 25.70 $ 23.61 $ 22.65 $ 25.03 $ 25.30 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 8.71 9.82 20.40 20.25 18.68 18.37 21.25 19.32 As of February 5, 2016, there were 33 registered holders of record of the common stock and 2,618 beneﬁcial holders, based on information obtained from our transfer agent. Dividends We have never declared or paid dividends on our capital stock. Our board of directors may consider adopting a dividend policy in the future. Any determinations by us to pay cash dividends on our common stock in the future will be based primarily upon our ﬁnancial condition, results of operations, business requirements, tax considerations and our board of directors’ continuing determination that the declaration of dividends under the dividend policy are in the best interests of our stockholders and are in compliance with all laws and agreements applicable to the dividend program. In the absence of such a policy, we intend to retain future earnings to ﬁnance the operation and expansion of our business. Our ﬁnancing arrangements also contain restrictions on our ability to pay cash dividends. Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Period October 1, 2015 − October 31, 2015 . . . . . . . . . November 1, 2015 − November 30, 2015 . . . . . . December 1, 2015 − December 31, 2015 2014 . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased(1)(2) Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit)(1)(2) — 11.26 9.38 9.38 — $ 237 89,300 89,537 $ Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs(2) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs(2) — — 89,300 89,300 — — 910,700 910,700 (1) During the three months ended December 31, 2015, we withheld 237 shares of common stock, at an average price of $11.26 per share, to satisfy tax obligations of certain of our employees upon the vesting of restricted stock awards under the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan. 34 (2) On December 14, 2015, we announced that our Board of Directors had approved the repurchase of up to one million shares of our outstanding common stock. During the three months ended December 31, 2015, we repurchased and retired 89,300 shares of our common stock at a weighted-average price of $9.38 per share for an aggregate price of approximately $0.8 million excluding related commission charges, under our publicly-announced repurchase plan. As of December 31, 2015, 0.9 million shares remained available for repurchase under our share repurchase plan. On February 4, 2016, our Board of Directors approved the repurchase of an additional one million shares of our outstanding common stock. The number, price, structure and timing of the repurchases, if any, will be at our sole discretion and future repurchases will be evaluated by us depending on market conditions, liquidity needs and other factors. The stock repurchases may be made in the open market, block trades or privately negotiated transactions. The primary purpose of the share repurchase program is to allow us the ﬂexibility to repurchase our common stock to return value to stockholders. The repurchase authorization does not have an expiration date and does not oblige us to acquire any particular amount of our common stock. Our Board of Directors may suspend, modify or terminate the repurchase program at any time without prior notice. Performance Graph The graph below compares cumulative shareholder returns on our common stock as compared with the Russell 2000 Stock Index and the Dow Jones Transportation Stock Index for the period from December 31, 2010 to December 31, 2015. The graph assumes an investment of $100 as of December 31, 2010. The stock performance shown on the performance graph below is not necessarily indicative of future performance. 200 175 150 125 100 75 50 25 12/31/10 12/31/11 12/31/12 12/31/13 12/31/14 12/31/15 CAI International, Inc. Russell 2000 Index Dow Jones Transportation Index Company/Index CAI International, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . Russell 2000 Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dow Jones Transportation Index . . . . 2015 51 145 147 Dec. 31, 2010 2011 Returns as of December 31, 2013 2014 2012 $ $ 100 100 100 $ $ 79 95 98 112 108 104 $ 120 148 145 $ 118 154 179 35 ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA The selected ﬁnancial data presented below have been derived from our audited consolidated ﬁnancial statements. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected in future periods. You should read the selected consolidated ﬁnancial data and operating data presented below in conjunction with ‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations’’ and with our consolidated ﬁnancial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Consolidated Statement of Operations Data 2015 (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) Revenue Container lease income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 217,505 $ 210,756 $ 197,360 $ 157,603 $ 110,404 — Rail lease income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — Logistics revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,957 Management fee revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,345 Gain on sale of equipment portfolios . . . . . . . . . Total revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125,706 10,336 — 6,497 — 227,589 2,972 — 12,094 1,256 173,925 7,179 — 7,866 — 212,405 17,433 11,502 3,227 — 249,667 2014 2012 2011 Year Ended December 31, 2013 Operating expenses Depreciation of rental equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . Storage, handling and other expenses . . . . . . . . . Logistics transportation costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss (gain) on sale of used rental equipment . . . . Administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total other expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income before income taxes and non-controlling interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income attributable to non-controlling 113,590 30,194 10,172 654 27,617 182,227 67,440 36,216 31,224 4,252 26,972 77,976 26,043 — (6,522) 26,538 124,035 103,554 35,978 67,109 19,257 — (7,356) 24,628 103,638 108,767 37,190 48,352 9,402 — (12,445) 25,560 70,869 103,056 28,957 67,576 7,191 60,385 71,577 7,057 64,520 74,099 9,818 64,281 33,633 5,513 — (13,374) 22,263 48,035 77,671 15,773 61,898 11,084 50,814 interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134 111 594 816 625 Net income attributable to CAI common stockholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 26,838 $ 60,274 $ 63,926 $ 63,465 $ 50,189 Net income per share attributable to CAI common stockholders Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1.29 $ 1.28 $ 2.91 $ 2.85 $ 2.89 $ 2.82 $ 3.26 $ 3.18 $ 2.60 2.55 Weighted average shares outstanding Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,773 20,988 20,732 21,155 22,157 22,672 19,495 19,945 19,295 19,693 Other Financial Data EBITDA (unaudited)(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 181,359 $ 181,910 $ 176,502 $ 151,821 $ 112,732 491,780 Purchase of equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,886 Net proceeds from sale of equipment portfolios . . 312,144 — 307,283 — 524,354 10,320 389,331 — 36 Consolidated Balance Sheet Data (Dollars in thousands) Cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Rental equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net investment in direct ﬁnance leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total assets Debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total CAI stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . 2015 59,765* $ As of December 31, 2013 54,994* $ 2014 62,053* $ 2012 22,047* $ 14,677* 2011 1,748,211 103,368 1,986,544 1,431,617 1,525,283 460,338 1,564,777 94,964 1,795,840 1,264,536 1,352,935 442,116 1,465,092 81,208 1,675,589 1,137,995 1,260,463 414,532 1,210,234 85,554 1,387,941 957,360 1,041,096 346,845 841,847 37,749 953,368 621,050 704,632 230,036 * Includes restricted cash of $7,212, $8,232, $9,253, $4,376 and $599 at December 31, 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Selected Operating Data (unaudited): Owned container ﬂeet in TEUs(2) Managed container ﬂeet in TEUs(2) . . . . . . . . . . . Owned container ﬂeet in CEUs(3) Managed container ﬂeet in CEUs(3) . . . . . . . . . . . Owned railcar ﬂeet in units . . . . . . . . . . . Percentage of on-lease container ﬂeet on long-term leases(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Percentage of on-lease container ﬂeet on short-term leases(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Percentage of on-lease container ﬂeet on ﬁnance leases(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average container ﬂeet utilization in TEUs(5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average container ﬂeet utilization in CEUs(6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average railcar ﬂeet utilization(7) . . . . . . . 984,085 198,093 1,182,178 1,029,117 177,958 1,207,075 5,096 934,101 235,538 1,169,639 961,244 214,432 1,175,676 2,361 860,729 283,725 1,144,454 903,713 262,071 1,165,784 1,804 704,417 359,133 1,063,550 745,966 331,017 1,076,983 1,456 470,401 458,254 928,655 491,076 414,475 905,551 — 74.0% 73.2% 74.9% 70.5% 78.7% 17.4% 20.0% 20.3% 23.4% 17.4% 8.6% 100.0% 6.8% 100.0% 4.8% 100.0% 6.1% 100.0% 3.9% 100.0% 91.8% 91.5% 91.8% 94.2% 97.6% 92.5% 96.6% 92.3% 95.9% 92.7% 94.1% 94.7% 81.6% 97.8% —% (1) EBITDA is deﬁned as net income before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization of intangible assets. We believe EBITDA is helpful in understanding our past ﬁnancial performance as a supplement to net income and other performance measures calculated in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP). Our management believes that EBITDA is useful to investors in evaluating our operating performance because it provides a measure of operating results unaffected by differences in capital structures, capital investment cycles and ages of related assets among otherwise comparable companies in our industry. EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, which you should not consider in isolation or as a substitute for any measure reported under GAAP; its usefulness as a performance measure as compared to net income is limited by the fact that EBITDA excludes the impact of interest expense, depreciation and amortization expense and taxes. We borrow money in order to ﬁnance our operations; therefore, interest expense is a necessary element of our costs and ability to generate revenue. Similarly, our use of capital assets makes depreciation and amortization expense a necessary element of our costs and ability to generate income. In addition, since we are subject to state and federal income taxes, any measure that excludes tax expense has material limitations. 37 The following table provides a reconciliation of EBITDA to net income, the most comparable performance measure under GAAP (in thousands): 2015 Year Ended December 31, 2013 2012 2014 Net income attributable to CAI common stockholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Net interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of intangible assets . . . . . . . . . Income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EBITDA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26,838 $ 36,034 114,003 232 4,252 181,359 60,274 $ 35,611 78,451 383 7,191 181,910 63,926 $ 37,108 67,631 780 7,057 176,502 63,465 $ 28,787 48,849 902 9,818 151,821 2011 50,189 16,127 34,078 1,254 11,084 112,732 (2) Reﬂects the total number of TEUs in our managed or owned equipment ﬂeet, as applicable, as of the end of the period indicated, including units held for sale and units we have purchased but held at the manufacturer. (3) Reﬂects the total number of CEUs in our managed or owned equipment ﬂeet, as applicable, as of the end of the period indicated, including units held for sale and units we have purchased but held at the manufacturer. (4) Long-term leases comprise leases that had a contractual term in excess of twelve months at the time of inception of the leases, including leases that permit cancellation by the lessee within 12 months if penalties are paid, and leases that have exceeded their initial contractual term of 12 months or greater. Short-term leases comprise leases that had a contractual term of 12 months or less at the time of inception of the leases. (5) Reﬂects the average number of TEUs in our equipment ﬂeet on lease as a percentage of total TEUs available for lease. In calculating TEUs available for lease, we exclude units for sale and units held at the manufacturer that we have purchased. (6) Reﬂects the average number of CEUs in our equipment ﬂeet on lease as a percentage of total CEUs available for lease. In calculating CEUs available for lease, we exclude units for sale and units held at the manufacturer that we have purchased. (7) Reﬂects the average number of units in our railcar ﬂeet on lease as a percentage of total units available for lease. In calculating units available for lease, we exclude units for sale and units held at the manufacturer that we have purchased. 38 ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following discussion and analysis of our ﬁnancial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated ﬁnancial statements and related notes thereto, included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition to historical consolidated ﬁnancial information, the following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reﬂect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results may differ materially from those contained in or implied by any forward-looking statements. See ‘‘Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.’’ Factors that could cause or contribute to these differences include those discussed below and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, particularly in Item 1A. ‘‘Risk Factors.’’ Unless the context requires otherwise, references to ‘‘CAI,’’ the ‘‘Company,’’ ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ or ‘‘our’’ in this Annual Report on Form 10-K refer to CAI International, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Overview We are one of the world’s leading transportation ﬁnance and logistics companies. We purchase equipment, primarily intermodal shipping containers and railcars, which we lease to our customers. We also manage equipment for third-party investors. In operating our ﬂeet, we lease, re-lease and dispose of equipment and contract for the repair, repositioning and storage of equipment. We also provide domestic and international logistics services. As of December 31, 2015, our container ﬂeet comprised 1,207,075 CEUs, 85.3% of which represented our owned ﬂeet and 14.7% of which represented our managed ﬂeet. In addition, we also own 5,096 railcars, which we lease within North America. In July 2015, we purchased ClearPointt, a U.S.-based intermodal logistics company focused on the domestic intermodal market, for approximately $4.1 million. The Company is headquartered in Everett, Washington. In February 2016, we purchased Challenger, a New Jersey based NVOCC for approximately $10.8 million. Our revenue comprises container lease income and rail lease income from our owned container and railcar ﬂeets, management fee income for managing containers for third-party investors and logistics revenue for the provision of logistics services. Our container and rail lease income depends primarily upon a combination of: (1) the number of units in our owned ﬂeet; (2) the utilization level of equipment in our owned ﬂeet; and (3) the per diem rates charged under each equipment lease. The same factors in our managed ﬂeet affect the amount of our management fee income. The number of CEUs in our ﬂeet varies over time as we purchase new equipment based on prevailing market conditions during the year and sell used equipment to parties in the secondary resale market. Key Metrics Utilization. We measure container utilization on the basis of the average number of TEUs and CEUs on lease expressed as a percentage of our total container ﬂeet available for lease. We calculate TEUs and CEUs available for lease by excluding containers that have been manufactured for us but have not been delivered and containers designated as held-for-sale units. Our utilization is primarily driven by the overall level of equipment demand, the location of our available equipment and the quality of our relationships with equipment lessees. The location of available equipment is critical because equipment available in high-demand locations is more readily leased and is typically leased on more favorable terms than equipment available in low-demand locations. 39 The equipment leasing market is highly competitive. As such, our relationships with our equipment lessees are important to ensure that container shipping lines continue to select us as one of their providers of leased equipment. Our average container ﬂeet utilization rate in TEUs for the year ended December 31, 2015 was 91.8% compared to 91.5% and 91.8% for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Our average container ﬂeet utilization rate in CEUs for the year ended December 31, 2015 was 92.5% compared to 92.3% and 92.7% for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The slight increase in our average ﬂeet utilization from 2014 is primarily attributable to an increase in containers designated as for sale during the current year as a result of slower growth in world trade and an increase in the supply of equipment. Our utilization rate may increase or decrease depending on future global economic conditions and the additional supply of new equipment. Per Diem Rates. The per diem rate for a lease is set at the time we enter into a lease agreement. Our long-term per diem rates have historically been strongly inﬂuenced by new equipment pricing, interest rates, the balance of supply and demand for equipment at a particular time and location, our estimate of the residual value of the equipment at the end of the lease, the type and age of the equipment being leased, purchasing activities of equipment by container shipping lines and efficiencies in container utilization by container shipping lines. The overall average per diem rates for equipment in our owned ﬂeet and in the portfolios of equipment comprising our managed ﬂeet do not change signiﬁcantly in response to changes in new equipment prices because existing lease agreements can only be re-priced upon the expiration of the lease. Revenue Our revenue is comprised of container lease income, rail lease income, logistics revenue and management fee revenue. Container Lease Income. We generate container lease income by leasing our owned containers primarily to container shipping lines. Approximately 94% of our container lease income is derived from rental of containers. Container lease income is comprised of monthly lease payments due under the lease agreements together with payments for other charges set forth in the leases, such as handling fees, drop-off charges and repair charges. A small percentage of our owned container ﬂeet is subject to ﬁnance leases. Under a ﬁnance lease, the lessee’s payments consist of principal and interest components. The interest component is recognized as ﬁnance lease income. Lessees under our ﬁnance leases have the substantive risks and rewards of equipment ownership and may have the option to purchase the equipment at the end of the lease term for a nominal amount. Rail Lease Income. We generate rail lease income by leasing our railcars primarily for the transport of industrial goods, materials and other products on railroad tracks throughout North America. Rail lease income is comprised of monthly lease payments due under the lease agreements. None of our railcars are subject to ﬁnance leases. Logistics Revenue. We generate logistics revenue by arranging for the movement of our customer’s freight through our network of transportation carriers and equipment providers. Revenue is comprised of the sales price charged to customers. Management Fee Revenue. Management fee revenue is generated by our management services, which include the leasing, re-leasing, repair, repositioning, storage and disposition of equipment. We provide these management services pursuant to management agreements with third-party investors that purchase portfolios of equipment from us. Under these agreements, which have multiple year terms, we earn fees for the management of the equipment and a commission, or a managed units’ sales fee, upon disposition of equipment under management. Our management fees are calculated as a percentage of net operating income for each managed unit, which is calculated as the lease payment and any other revenue attributable to a speciﬁc unit owned by the third-party investor under a lease, minus operating expenses related to the unit, excluding the third-party investor’s depreciation and ﬁnancing expense. The management fee percentage varies based upon the type of lease and the terms of the management agreement. Management fee percentages for long-term leases are generally lower than management fee percentages for short-term leases because less management time is required to manage long-term leases. Managed units’ sales fees are equal to a ﬁxed dollar amount or based upon a percentage of the sales price. 40 Operating Expenses Our operating expenses include depreciation of rental equipment, storage, handling and other expenses applicable to our owned equipment, and administrative expenses. We depreciate our containers on a straight line basis over a period ranging from 12 to 15 years to a ﬁxed estimated residual value depending on the type of container (See Note 2(d) in our consolidated ﬁnancial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K). We regularly assess both the estimated useful life of our containers and the expected residual values, and, when warranted, adjust our depreciation estimate accordingly. Railcar equipment is depreciated over its estimated useful life of 43 years to its estimated residual value using the straight line method. Depreciation expense for rental equipment will vary over time based upon the number and the purchase price of our owned equipment. If our rental equipment is impaired, the equipment is written-down to its fair value and the amount of the write-down is recorded in depreciation expense. Storage, handling and other expenses are operating costs of our owned ﬂeet. Storage and handling expenses occur when lessees drop off equipment at depots at the end of a lease. Storage and handling expenses vary signiﬁcantly by location. Other expenses include repair expenses, which are the result of normal wear and tear on the equipment, and repositioning expenses, which are incurred when we contract to move equipment from locations where our inventories exceed actual or expected demand to locations with higher demand. Storage, handling and other expenses are directly related to the number of units in our owned ﬂeet and inversely related to our utilization rate for those units: as utilization increases, we typically have lower storage, handling and repositioning expenses. Logistics transportation costs represent the expenses we incur for providing logistics services to our customers. Such costs include shipping, pick-up and delivery charges, primarily from railroads and drayage companies we contract with to fulﬁll the movement of our customers’ freight. Our administrative expenses are primarily employee-related costs such as salary, bonus and commission expenses, employee beneﬁts, rent, allowance for doubtful accounts and travel and entertainment costs, as well as expenses incurred for outside services such as legal, consulting and audit-related fees. Our operating expenses include the gain or loss on sale of used rental equipment. This gain or loss is the result of our sale of older used equipment in the secondary resale market and is the difference between: (1) the cash we receive for these units, less selling expenses; and (2) the net book value of the units. Results of Operations The following table summarizes our results of operations for the three years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands): Year Ended December 31, 2014 2015 2013 Revenue Container lease income Rail lease income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Logistics revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Management fee revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 217,505 $ 210,756 $ 197,360 7,179 — 7,866 212,405 10,336 — 6,497 227,589 17,433 11,502 3,227 249,667 Operating expenses Depreciation of rental equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Storage, handling and other expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Logistics transportation costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss (gain) on sale of used rental equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total other expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income before income taxes and non-controlling interest . . . . . . . . . Income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income attributable to non-controlling interest Net income attributable to CAI common stockholders . . . . . . . . . . . $ 113,590 30,194 10,172 654 27,617 182,227 67,440 36,216 31,224 4,252 26,972 134 26,838 $ 77,976 26,043 — (6,522) 26,538 124,035 103,554 35,978 67,576 7,191 60,385 111 60,274 $ 67,109 19,257 — (7,356) 24,628 103,638 108,767 37,190 71,577 7,057 64,520 594 63,926 41 Year Ended December 31, 2015 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2014 Revenue. The above table shows the composition of our revenue. The following discussion explains the signiﬁcant changes in the composition of our total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to the year ended December 31, 2014: Container Lease Income. Container lease income increased $6.7 million, or 3%, to $217.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, from $210.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. This was primarily due to a $9.8 million increase in rental revenue attributable to a 5% increase in the average number of CEUs of owned containers on lease and a $0.6 million increase in ﬁnance lease income, reﬂecting the additional ﬁnance leases entered into during the last 12 months, partially offset by a $6.1 million decrease in revenue resulting from a 3% decrease in average owned container per diem rental rates. We made investments in containers during the year ended December 31, 2015 which increased the average size of the owned ﬂeet by 7%, although the impact on rental revenue was partially offset by a slight reduction in the utilization of our owned ﬂeet, on a CEU basis, from 93.7% in the year ended December 31, 2014 to 93.4% in the year ended December 31, 2015. The reduction in average container per diem rental rates has been caused by competitive market pressure, as well as our investment in used containers through sale and leaseback transactions and the acquisition of container portfolios from our managed ﬂeet. Used containers are purchased at a lower price, and command a lower per diem rental rate, than new containers. Approximately 15% of our investment in containers during the last twelve months was in used containers. New container prices have declined in recent periods, primarily due to a drop in steel prices, leading to decreases in container per diem rates. Demand for new containers has also softened, primarily due to economic conditions in China, resulting in a decline in container rental revenue that may continue in future periods. Rail Lease Income. Rail lease income increased $7.1 million, or 69%, to $17.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, from $10.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, primarily as a result of a 69% increase in the average size of our railcar ﬂeet during the last 12 months. Logistics Revenue. Logistics revenue of $11.5 million was recognized for the year ended December 31, 2015, mainly attributable to the acquisition of ClearPointt during the year. Management Fee Revenue. Management fee revenue for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $3.2 million, a decrease of $3.3 million, or 50%, from $6.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, primarily due to a non-recurring charge of $0.8 million recorded during the year related to an adjustment of prior period management fees. In addition, there was a 17% reduction in the size of the on-lease managed container ﬂeet as a result of our purchase of previously managed container portfolios, and a decrease of 5% in average per diem rates in our managed ﬂeet for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to the year ended December 31, 2014. The size of our managed ﬂeet has decreased in the past several years as market conditions have favored the purchase of container portfolios from our managed container ﬂeet rather than establishing new portfolios. We continue to believe that the management of equipment for third party investors is beneﬁcial to our company and we will continue to pursue those opportunities. At the same time, based on market conditions, we intend to continue to pursue the purchase of container portfolios if attractive opportunities present themselves. Consequently, market conditions will dictate whether there will be net additions or subtractions from our managed ﬂeet. Expenses. The following discussion explains the signiﬁcant changes in expenses for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to the year ended December 31, 2014: 42 Depreciation of Rental Equipment. Depreciation of rental equipment increased by $35.6 million, or 46%, to $113.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, from $78.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. This increase was primarily attributable to a $24.5 million impairment charge recorded during the year for certain off-lease containers, which represented approximately 10% of our standard owned dry van ﬂeet, a 7% increase in the size of our owned container ﬂeet and an increase of $1.8 million in depreciation attributable to CAI Rail, reﬂecting the increase in size of our railcar ﬂeet. Depreciation typically grows at a higher rate than the size of the ﬂeet as older units with little or no depreciation charge are replaced with new equipment. Storage, Handling and Other Expenses. Storage, handling and other expenses increased by $4.2 million, or 16%, to $30.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, from $26.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase was primarily attributable to a $1.5 million increase in repair costs and a $2.5 million increase in storage costs caused by an increase in the average volume of off-lease and for sale owned equipment during the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to the year ended December 31, 2014. Logistics Transportation Costs. Transportation costs of $10.2 million were recognized for the year ended December 31, 2015, mainly attributable to the acquisition of ClearPointt during the year. Loss (gain) on Sale of Used Rental Equipment. Loss on sale of used rental equipment increased $7.2 million to a loss of $0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, a 110% increase from a gain of $6.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. The decrease has primarily been caused by a reduction in average sale price, reﬂecting the continued decline in new equipment prices, as well as the impact of the strengthening of the dollar compared to other currencies. Included in the loss on sale of used rental equipment for the year ended December 31, 2015 was a gain of $1.6 million arising from the sale of newly manufactured railcars, and a loss of $0.9 million due to the write-off of equipment on lease to customers that is unlikely to be recovered. Administrative Expenses. Administrative expenses increased by $1.1 million, or 4%, to $27.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, from $26.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase was primarily a result of higher employee-related costs as a result of an increase in headcount, particularly in our Rail and Logistics businesses. Net Interest Expense. Net interest expense of $36.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 increased $0.8 million, or 2%, from $35.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase in net interest expense was due primarily to an increase in our average loan principal balance as we continue to increase our borrowings to ﬁnance our acquisition of additional rental equipment, partially offset by a reduction in the average interest rate on outstanding debt. Other Expense. Other expense of $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 decreased $0.6 million, or 76%, from $0.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. The decrease was due primarily to a decrease of $0.4 million in the write-off of prepaid ﬁnancing costs related to reﬁnancing arrangements and a decrease of $0.2 million in foreign exchange transaction losses. Gains and losses on foreign currency primarily occur when foreign denominated ﬁnancial assets and liabilities are either settled or remeasured in U.S. dollars. The loss on foreign exchange for the year ended December 31, 2015 was primarily the result of movements in the U.S. dollar exchange rate against the Euro. 43 Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense of $4.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 decreased $2.9 million from $7.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. The effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2015 was 13.6% compared to an effective tax rate of 10.6% for the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase in rate is primarily attributable to the growth of our railcar ﬂeet during 2015 and a $24.5 million impairment charge recognized in the year. The increase in the proportion of our railcar ﬂeet combined with a decrease of pretax income in lower tax jurisdictions due to the impairment charge has led to a corresponding increase in the proportion of pretax income generated in higher tax jurisdictions, resulting in an increase in the effective tax rate. Note 11 to our consolidated ﬁnancial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K includes a reconciliation between the tax expense calculated at the statutory U.S. income tax rate and the actual tax expense for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014. Foreign tax differentials for those years of $7.7 million and $18.0 million, respectively, are the primary reasons for the effective tax rates in both years being below the statutory U.S. rate. Year Ended December 31, 2014 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2013 Revenue. The above table shows the composition of our revenue. The following discussion explains the signiﬁcant changes in the composition of our total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to the year ended December 31, 2013: Container Lease Income. Container lease income increased $13.4 million, or 7%, to $210.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, from $197.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. This was primarily due to a $20.0 million increase in rental revenue attributable to an 11% increase in the average number of CEUs of owned containers on lease, receipt of a $2.6 million settlement from a customer during the year and a $0.9 million increase in ﬁnance lease income, reﬂecting the additional ﬁnance leases entered into during the last 12 months, partially offset by a $7.6 million decrease in revenue resulting from a 4% decrease in average owned container per diem rental rates. We made investments in containers during the year ended December 31, 2014 which increased the average size of the owned ﬂeet by 11%, although the impact on rental revenue was partially offset by a reduction in the utilization of our owned ﬂeet, on a CEU basis, from 94.1% in the year ended December 31, 2013 to 93.7% in the year ended December 31, 2014. The reduction in average container per diem rental rates has been caused by competitive market pressure, as well as our investment in used containers through sale and leaseback transactions and the acquisition of container portfolios from our managed ﬂeet. Used containers are purchased at a lower price, and command a lower per diem rental rate, than new containers. Approximately 15% of our investment in containers during the last twelve months was in used containers. Rail Lease Income. Rail lease income increased $3.2 million, or 44%, to $10.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, from $7.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, primarily as a result of a 31% increase in the average size of our railcar ﬂeet during the last 12 months. Management Fee Revenue. Management fee revenue for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $6.5 million, a decrease of $1.4 million, or 17%, from $7.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. An 18% reduction in the size of the on-lease managed container ﬂeet, and a decrease of 4% in average per diem rates in our managed ﬂeet for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to the year ended December 31, 2013, was partially offset by increased commission earned on the volume of used equipment sold from the management ﬂeet. The size of our managed ﬂeet has decreased in the past several years as market conditions have favored the purchase of container portfolios from our managed container ﬂeet rather than establishing new portfolios. We continue to believe the management of equipment for third party investors is beneﬁcial to our company and we will continue to pursue those opportunities. At the same time, based on market conditions, we will continue to pursue the purchase of container portfolios if attractive opportunities present themselves. Consequently, market conditions will dictate whether there will be net additions or subtractions from our managed ﬂeet. 44 Expenses. The following discussion explains the signiﬁcant changes in expenses for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to the year ended December 31, 2013: Depreciation of Rental Equipment. Depreciation of rental equipment increased by $10.9 million, or 16%, to $78.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, from $67.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. This increase was primarily attributable to an 11% increase in the size of our owned container ﬂeet, an increase of $0.8 million in depreciation attributable to CAI Rail, reﬂecting the increase in size of our railcar ﬂeet, and the reclassiﬁcation of certain leases from ﬁnancing to operating during the year ended December 31, 2013. Storage, Handling and Other Expenses. Storage, handling and other expenses increased by $6.8 million, or 35%, to $26.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, from $19.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. The average size of our owned container ﬂeet increased by 11% compared to the year ended December 31, 2013 and the number of off-lease and for sale containers in our owned ﬂeet increased by 39% compared to the previous year, resulting in higher storage and related costs. Handling charges also increased by $1.2 million, compared to the year ended December 31, 2013, due to relocating off-lease units to higher demand areas for sale or lease. Gain on Sale of Used Rental Equipment. Gain on sale of used rental equipment decreased $0.8 million to $6.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, an 11% decrease from a gain of $7.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. We sold more used containers at a lower average price and margin during the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to the year ended December 31, 2013. Administrative Expense. Administrative expenses increased by $1.9 million, or 8%, to $26.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, from $24.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. The increase was primarily a result of higher professional fees incurred in the current year and higher employee-related costs as a result of an increase in headcount, particularly in our Rail business, partially offset by a $0.4 million decrease in amortization of intangible assets due to certain intangible assets that became fully amortized during the third quarter of 2013. Net Interest Expense. Net interest expense of $35.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 decreased $0.8 million, or 2%, from $36.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. The decrease in net interest expense was due primarily to a reduction in the average interest rate on outstanding debt, partially offset by an increase in our average loan principal balance as we continue to increase our borrowings to ﬁnance our acquisition of additional rental equipment. Other expense. Other expense of $0.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 decreased $0.4 million, or 35%, from $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. The decrease was due primarily to a decrease of $0.7 million in the write-off of prepaid ﬁnancing costs related to reﬁnancing arrangements, partially offset by an increase of $0.3 million in foreign exchange transaction losses. Gains and losses on foreign currency primarily occur when foreign denominated ﬁnancial assets and liabilities are either settled or remeasured in U.S. dollars. The loss on foreign exchange for the year ended December 31, 2014 was primarily the result of movements in the U.S. dollar exchange rate against the Euro. 45 Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense of $7.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 increased $0.1 million from $7.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. The effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2014 was 10.6% compared to an effective tax rate of 9.9% for the year ended December 31, 2013. The increase in rate is primarily attributable to a non-cash charge of $0.6 million and an increase in tax arising from the gain on sale of units previously on lease to a customer. The majority of these units were owned by the parent company, as opposed to subsidiary companies in Barbados or Bermuda, and thus were subject to U.S. tax. Excluding the prior period charge and the sale of these units, the full year effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2014 would have been approximately 9.0%. The proportion of our on-lease owned ﬂeet owned by subsidiary companies in Barbados and Bermuda, where income tax rates are lower than in the U.S., increased from approximately 90% in the year ended December 31, 2013 to 92% in the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase in the proportion of the ﬂeet owned by our international subsidiaries has led to a corresponding increase in the proportion of pretax income generated in lower tax jurisdictions, resulting in a decrease in the effective tax rate. Note 11 of our consolidated ﬁnancial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K includes a reconciliation between the tax expense calculated at the statutory U.S. income tax rate and the actual tax expense for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. Foreign tax differentials for those years of $18.0 million and $19.0 million, respectively, are the primary reasons for the effective tax rates in both years being below the statutory U.S. rate. Liquidity and Capital Resources Our principal sources of liquidity have historically been cash ﬂows from operations, sales of equipment portfolios, borrowings from ﬁnancial institutions and sale of our stock. We believe that cash ﬂow from operations, future sales of equipment portfolios and borrowing availability under our credit facilities will be sufficient to meet our liquidity needs for at least the next 12 months. We have typically funded a signiﬁcant portion of the purchase price for new equipment through borrowings under our credit facilities. However, from time to time we have funded new equipment acquisitions through the use of working capital. Revolving Credit Facilities (i) On March 15, 2013, we entered into the Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement, as amended, with a consortium of banks to ﬁnance the acquisition of container rental equipment and for general working capital purposes. As of December 31, 2015, the maximum commitment under our revolving credit facility was $775.0 million, which may be increased to a maximum of $960.0 million under certain conditions described in the agreement. As of December 31, 2015, we had an outstanding balance of $496.5 million and availability of $278.4 million under our revolving credit facility (net of $0.1 million in letters of credit), subject to our ability to meet the collateral requirements under the agreement governing the facility. Based on the borrowing base and collateral requirement at December 31, 2015, the borrowing availability under the revolving credit facility was $93.1 million, assuming no additional contribution of assets. The entire amount of the facility drawn at any time plus accrued interest and fees is callable on demand in the event of certain speciﬁed events of default. There is a commitment fee on the unused amount of the total commitment, payable quarterly in arrears. The revolving credit facility provides that swing line loans (short-term borrowings of up to $10.0 million in the aggregate that are payable within 10 business days or at maturity date, whichever comes earlier) and standby letters of credit (up to $15.0 million in the aggregate) will be available to us. These credit commitments are part of, and not in addition to, the maximum credit commitment. The interest rates vary depending upon whether the loans are characterized as Base Rate loans or Eurodollar Rate loans as deﬁned in the revolving credit facility. Interest rates are based on LIBOR for Eurodollar loans and Base Rate for Base Rate loans. As of December 31, 2015 the average interest rate on our revolving credit facility was 1.8%. The revolving credit facility will mature in March 2020. 46 We use our revolving credit facility primarily to fund the purchase of containers and for general working capital needs. As of December 31, 2015, we had commitments to purchase $12.0 million of containers and had rental equipment payable of $10.9 million. We have typically used our cash ﬂow from operations and the proceeds from sales of equipment portfolios to third-party investors to repay our revolving credit facility. As we expand our owned ﬂeet, our revolving credit facility balance will be higher and will result in higher interest expense. (ii) On October 22, 2015, we entered into the Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement for CAI Rail with a consortium of banks, pursuant to which the prior revolving credit facility was amended. As of December 31, 2015, the maximum credit commitment under the revolving line of credit was $500.0 million. CAI Rail’s revolving credit facility may be increased up to a maximum of $700.0 million, in accordance with the terms of the agreement. Borrowings under this revolving credit facility bear interest at a variable rate. The interest rates vary depending upon whether the loans are characterized as Base Rate loans or Eurodollar Rate loans, as deﬁned in the revolving credit agreement. Interest rates are based on LIBOR for Eurodollar loans and Base Rate for Base Rate loans. As of December 31, 2015, the average interest rate under the agreement was 1.9%. As of December 31, 2015, the outstanding balance under CAI Rail’s revolving credit facility was $160.5 million. As of December 31, 2015, we had $339.5 million in availability under the facility, subject to our ability to meet the collateral requirements under the agreement governing the facility. Based on the borrowing base and collateral requirements at December 31, 2015, the borrowing availability under the credit facility was $6.8 million, assuming no additional contribution of assets. The entire amount of the facility drawn at any time plus accrued interest and fees is callable on demand in the event of certain speciﬁed events of default. The revolving credit facility for CAI Rail will terminate in October 2020. We use the revolving credit facility primarily to fund the purchase of railcars. As of December 31, 2015, we had commitments to purchase $268.1 million of railcars; $111.0 million in the twelve months ending December 31, 2016, $111.6 million in the twelve months ending December 31, 2017 and $45.5 million in the twelve months ending December 31, 2018. Term Loan Facilities (i) On March 22, 2013, we entered into a $30.0 million ﬁve-year term loan agreement with Development Bank of Japan (DBJ). The loan is payable in 19 quarterly installments of $0.5 million starting July 31, 2013 and a ﬁnal payment of $21.5 million on April 30, 2018. The loan bears a variable interest rate based on LIBOR. As of December 31, 2015, the loan had a balance of $25.5 million and an average interest rate of 2.3%. (ii) On December 20, 2010, we entered into a term loan agreement with a consortium of banks. Under this loan agreement, we were eligible to borrow up to $300.0 million, subject to certain borrowing conditions, which amount is secured by certain assets of our wholly-owned foreign subsidiaries. The loan agreement is an amortizing facility with a term of six years. The interest rates vary depending upon whether the loans are characterized as Base Rate loans or Eurodollar rate loans, as deﬁned in the term loan agreement. The loan bears a variable interest rate based on LIBOR for Eurodollar loans, and Base Rate for Base Rate loans. On March 28, 2013, the term loan agreement was amended which reduced the principal balance of the loan from $249.4 million to $125.0 million through payment of $124.4 million from the proceeds of the $229.0 million ﬁxed-rate asset-backed notes issued by the Company’s indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, CAL Funding II Limited (see paragraph (ii) of Asset-Backed Notes below). On October 1, 2014, we entered into an amended and restated term loan agreement with a consortium of banks, pursuant to which the prior loan agreement was reﬁnanced. The amended and restated term loan agreement, which contains similar terms to the prior loan agreement, was amended to, among other things: (a) reduce the borrowing rates from LIBOR plus 2.25% to LIBOR plus 1.6% (per annum) for Eurodollar loans, (b) increase the outstanding loan commitment from $115.0 million to $150.0 million, (c) extend the maturity to October 1, 2019, and (d) revise certain of the covenants and restrictions under the prior loan agreement to provide us with additional ﬂexibility. As of December 31, 2015, the term loan had a balance of $138.8 million and average interest rate of 2.2%. 47 (iii) On April 11, 2012, we entered into a term loan agreement with a consortium of banks. The agreement, as amended, provides for a ﬁve-year term loan of up to $142.0 million, subject to certain borrowing conditions, which amount is secured by certain of our assets. The commitment under the loan may be increased to a maximum of $200.0 million, under certain conditions described in the agreement. The outstanding principal amounts under the term loan bear interest based on LIBOR, are amortized quarterly, and require quarterly payments equal to 1.75% multiplied by the outstanding principal amount at such time. The full $142.0 million has been drawn and was primarily used to repay outstanding amounts under the revolving credit facility. All unpaid amounts then outstanding are due and payable on April 11, 2017. As of December 31, 2015, the loan had a balance of $109.4 million and an interest rate of 1.9%. (iv) On December 22, 2015, we entered into a $20.0 million ﬁve-year term loan agreement for CAI Rail with Siemens Financial Services, Inc. (Siemens). The term loan’s outstanding principal bears interest at a ﬁxed rate of 3.4% per annum and is amortized quarterly. Any unpaid principal and interest is due and payable on December 22, 2020. The proceeds from the term loan were primarily used to repay outstanding amounts under CAI Rail’s revolving credit facility. As of December 31, 2015, the loan had a balance of $20.0 million. Asset-Backed Notes (i) On October 18, 2012, CAL Funding II Limited (CAL II) issued $171.0 million of 3.47% ﬁxed rate asset-backed notes (Series 2012-1 Asset-Backed Notes). Principal and interest on the Series 2102-1 Asset-Backed Notes is payable monthly commencing on November 26, 2012, and the Series 2012-1 Asset-Backed Notes mature in October 2027. The proceeds from the Series 2012-1 Asset-Backed Notes were used to repay part of the Company’s borrowings under its senior revolving credit facility. The Series 2012-1 Asset-Backed Notes had a balance of $116.9 million as of December 31, 2015. (ii) On March 28, 2013, CAL II issued $229 million of 3.35% ﬁxed rate asset-backed notes (Series 2013-1 Asset-Backed Notes). Principal and interest on the Series 2013-1 Asset-Backed Notes are payable monthly commencing on April 25, 2013, and the Series 2013-1 Asset-Backed Notes mature in March 2028. The proceeds from the new Series 2013-1 Asset-Backed Notes were used partly to reduce the balance of the Company’s term loan with a consortium of banks as described in paragraph (ii) of Term Loan Facilities above, and to partially pay down the Company’s senior revolving credit facility. The Series 2013-1 Asset-Backed Notes had a balance of $166.0 million as of December 31, 2015. The agreements under each of the asset-backed notes described above require the Company to maintain a restricted cash account to cover payment of the obligations. As of December 31, 2015, the restricted cash account had a balance of $7.2 million. Other Debt Obligations On September 13, 2012, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Container Applications Limited (CAL), entered into a Note Purchase Agreement with certain institutional investors, pursuant to which CAL issued $103.0 million of 4.9% Senior Secured Notes due September 13, 2022 (the Notes) to the investors. The Notes are guaranteed by us and secured by certain of our assets and those of CAL. The Notes bear interest at 4.9% per annum, due and payable semiannually on March 13 and September 13 of each year, commencing on March 13, 2013. In addition, CAL is required to make certain principal payments on March 13 and September 13 of each year, commencing on March 13, 2013. Any unpaid principal and interest is due and payable on September 13, 2022. As of December 31, 2015, the Notes had a balance of $78.3 million. On May 8, 2014, we entered into a short term uncommitted line of credit agreement. Under this credit agreement, we are eligible to borrow up to $75.0 million, subject to certain borrowing conditions. Loans made under the line of credit are repayable on the earlier of (a) 3 months after the loan is made, and (b) the facility termination date of May 8, 2016. Outstanding loans bear a variable interest rate based on LIBOR. The full $75.0 million was drawn and was primarily used to repay outstanding amounts under our senior revolving credit facility. As of December 31, 2015, the full $75.0 million was paid down. 48 On June 25, 2014, one of our Japanese investor funds that is consolidated by us as a VIE (see Note 3 to our consolidated ﬁnancial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K) entered into a term loan agreement with a bank. Under the terms of the agreement, the Japanese investor fund entered into two loans; a ﬁve year, amortizing loan of $9.2 million at a ﬁxed interest rate of 2.7%, and a ﬁve year, non-amortizing loan of $1.6 million at a variable interest rate based on LIBOR. The debt is secured by assets of the Japanese investor fund, and is subject to certain borrowing conditions set out in the loan agreement. As of December 31, 2015, the term loans held by the Japanese investor fund totaled $7.6 million and had an average interest rate of 2.6%. As of December 31, 2015, we had collateralized ﬁnancing obligations totaling $112.2 million (see Note 3 to our consolidated ﬁnancial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K). The obligations had an average interest rate of 0.7% as of December 31, 2015 with maturity dates between March 2016 and June 2019. As of December 31, 2015, we had capital lease obligations of less than $0.1 million. The underlying obligations are denominated in Euros at ﬂoating interest rates averaging 2.8% as of December 31, 2015, with maturity dates of March 2016. Our term loans, senior secured notes, asset-backed notes, collateralized ﬁnancing obligations, term loans held by VIEs and capital lease obligations are secured by speciﬁc pools of rental equipment and other assets owned by the Company, the underlying leases thereon and the Company’s interest in any money received under such contracts. In addition to customary events of default, our revolving credit facilities and term loans contain restrictive covenants, including limitations on certain liens, indebtedness and investments. In addition, all of our debt facilities contain various restrictive ﬁnancial and other covenants. The ﬁnancial covenants in our debt facilities require us to maintain (1) a maximum consolidated funded debt to consolidated tangible net worth ratio of 3.75:1.00; and (2) a minimum ﬁxed charge coverage ratio of 1.20:1.00. As of December 31, 2015, we were in compliance with all of our debt covenants. Under certain conditions, as deﬁned in our credit agreements with our banks and/or note holders, we are subject to certain cross default provisions that may result in an acceleration of principal repayment under these credit facilities if an uncured default condition were to exist. Our asset-backed notes are not subject to any such cross default provisions. Cash Flow The following table sets forth certain cash ﬂow information for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands): Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjustments to income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash provided by operating activities Net cash used in investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash provided by ﬁnancing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Effect on cash of foreign currency translation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net (decrease) increase in cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash at beginning of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash at end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 49 $ $ Year Ended December 31, 2014 60,385 79,302 139,687 (225,355) 95,142 (1,394) 8,080 45,741 53,821 2015 26,972 120,397 147,369 (305,248) 156,536 75 (1,268) 53,821 52,553 $ $ 2013 64,520 59,666 124,186 (266,806) 172,101 (1,411) 28,070 17,671 45,741 Operating Activities Cash Flows Net cash provided by operating activities of $147.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 increased $7.7 million from $139.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase was primarily due to an $11.9 million increase in net income as adjusted for depreciation, amortization and other non-cash items, partially offset by a $4.2 million decrease in our net working capital adjustments. Net working capital used in operating activities of $4.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2015 was primarily due to a $3.7 million decrease in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities, primarily caused by the timing of payments and a $7.2 million decrease in amounts due to container investors, partially offset by a $4.7 million decrease in accounts receivable, primarily caused by the timing of receipts, and a $1.4 million increase in unearned revenue, primarily caused by a rail contract we entered into in 2015. Net cash provided by operating activities of $139.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 increased $15.5 million from $124.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. The increase was primarily due to a $6.7 million increase in net income as adjusted for depreciation, amortization and other non-cash items, as well as an $8.8 million increase in our net working capital adjustments. Net working capital decreased by $0.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2014, due to a $4.3 million reduction in prepaid expenses and other assets, primarily due to the repayment of a $5.0 million bond, and an increase of $3.0 million in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities, primarily caused by the timing of payments. These increases to net working capital were offset by a $6.4 million increase to accounts receivable, primarily caused by the timing of receipts, and a decrease of $1.8 million in due to container investors. Investing Activities Cash Flows Net cash used in investing activities increased $79.9 million to $305.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 from $225.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase in cash usage was primarily attributable to an $82.0 million increase in the purchase of rental equipment and the $4.1 million acquisition of our new logistics business, ClearPointt, partially offset by a $5.8 million increase in receipt of principal payments from direct ﬁnancing leases. Net cash used in investing activities decreased $41.4 million to $225.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 from $266.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. The decrease in cash usage was primarily attributable to a $32.6 million increase in cash proceeds received from the disposition of used rental equipment, a $4.0 million increase in receipt of principal payments from direct ﬁnancing leases, and a $4.9 million decrease in the purchase of rental equipment. Financing Activities Cash Flows Net cash provided by ﬁnancing activities of $156.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 increased $61.4 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2014 primarily as a result of higher net borrowings being required to ﬁnance the acquisition of rental equipment. During the year ended December 31, 2015, our net cash inﬂow from borrowings was $167.0 million compared to $127.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, reﬂecting the increase in investment in rental equipment during 2015 compared to 2014. Net cash provided by ﬁnancing activities of $94.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 decreased $77.5 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2013 primarily as a result of lower net borrowings being required to ﬁnance the acquisition of rental equipment. During the year ended December 31, 2014, our net cash inﬂow from borrowings was $127.4 million compared to $181.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, reﬂecting the reduction in investment in rental equipment during 2014 compared to 2013. 50 Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments The following table sets forth our contractual obligations and commercial commitments by due date as of December 31, 2015 (in thousands): Total debt obligations: . . . . . . . $ Revolving credit facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Term loans . . . . . . . . . . Senior secured notes . . . . . . . . . . . Asset-backed notes Collateralized ﬁnancing obligations . Term loans held by VIE . . . . . . . . Capital lease obligations . . . . . . . . Interest on debt and capital lease Payments Due by Period Less than 1 year Total 1 − 2 years 2 − 3 years 3 − 4 years 4 − 5 years 657,000 $ 43,000 $ 293,630 78,280 282,875 112,250 7,577 5 21,859 7,175 40,000 58,552 1,829 5 — $ — $ 111,398 6,110 40,000 18,295 1,829 — 32,099 6,110 40,000 25,217 1,829 — — $ 614,000 15,284 6,110 40,000 — — — 112,990 6,110 40,000 10,186 2,090 — obligations(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rental equipment payable . . . . . . . . . . . Rent, office facilities and equipment Equipment purchase commitments . . . . Total contractual obligations 8,387 — — — . . . . . . . $ 1,846,664 $ 339,720 $ 317,866 $ 175,563 $ 193,014 $ 683,781 121,202 10,901 2,805 280,139 31,932 10,901 1,398 123,069 27,517 — 1,154 111,563 24,593 — 208 45,507 21,593 — 45 — More than 5 years $ — — 46,665 82,875 — — — 7,180 — — — $ 136,720 (1) Our estimate of interest expense commitment includes $46.3 million relating to our revolving credit facilities, $17.6 million relating to our term loans, $19.7 million relating to our senior secured notes, $34.4 million relating to our asset backed notes, $2.8 million relating to our collateralized ﬁnancing obligations, $0.4 million related to our term loans held by VIEs, and less than $0.1 million relating to our capital lease obligations. The calculation of interest commitment related to our debt assumes the following weighted average interest rates as of December 31, 2015: revolving credit facilities, 1.8%; term loans, 2.2%; senior secured notes, 4.9%; asset backed notes, 3.4%; collateralized ﬁnancing obligations, 0.7%; term loans held by VIEs, 2.6%; and capital lease obligations, 2.8%. These calculations assume that interest rates will remain at the same level over the next ﬁve years. We expect that interest rates will vary over time based upon ﬂuctuations in the underlying indexes upon which these interest rates are based. See Note 9 to our consolidated ﬁnancial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a description of the terms of our revolving credit facilities, term loans, asset based notes and capital lease obligations. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements As of December 31, 2015, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements or obligations other than noted below. An off-balance sheet arrangement includes any contractual obligation, agreement or transaction arrangement involving an unconsolidated entity under which we would have: (1) retained a contingent interest in transferred assets; (2) an obligation under derivative instruments classiﬁed as equity; (3) any obligation arising out of a material variable interest in an unconsolidated entity that provides ﬁnancing, liquidity, market risk or credit risk support to us, or that engages in leasing, hedging or research and development services with us; or (4) made guarantees. 51 We transferred ownership of certain equipment to Japanese container funds which were established by Japan Investment Adviser Co., Ltd. (JIA) and CAIJ, Inc. (CAIJ). CAIJ is an 80%-owned subsidiary of CAI with the remaining 20% owned by JIA. Prior to September 2013, JIA was owned and controlled by a Managing Director of CAIJ. Prior to the purchase of equipment from us, the purchasing entities had received contributions from unrelated Japanese investors, under separate Japanese investment agreements allowed under Japanese commercial laws. The contributions were used to purchase equipment from us. Under the terms of the agreement, the CAI related Japanese entities will manage each of the investments but may outsource all or part of each operation to a third party. Pursuant to its services agreements with investors, the Japanese container funds have outsourced the general management of their operations to CAIJ. The Japanese container funds have also entered into equipment management service agreements and ﬁnancing arrangements whereby we manage the leasing activity of equipment owned by the Japanese container funds. The proﬁt or loss from each investment will substantially belong to each respective investor, except with respect to certain ﬁnancing arrangements where the terms of the transaction provide us with an option to purchase the equipment at a ﬁxed price. If we decide to exercise our purchase options and resell the equipment to a third party, then we would realize any gain or loss from the sale. See Notes 3 and 14 to our consolidated ﬁnancial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates The preparation of ﬁnancial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to use judgment in making estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the ﬁnancial statements. We have identiﬁed the policies and estimates below as critical to our business operations and the understanding of our results of operations. These policies and estimates are considered critical due to the existence of uncertainty at the time the estimate is made, the likelihood of changes in estimates from period to period and the potential impact that these estimates can have on our ﬁnancial statements. Signiﬁcant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include revenue recognition, consolidation of container funds, accounting for rental equipment, allowance for doubtful accounts and income taxes. The following accounting policies and estimates include inherent risks and uncertainties related to judgments and assumptions made by us. Our estimates are based on the relevant information available at the end of each period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Revenue Recognition We provide a range of services to our customers incorporating rental, sale and management of equipment, and the provision of logistics services. Revenue for all forms of service is recognized when earned following the guidelines under FASB ASC 605, Revenue Recognition and ASC 840, Leases. Revenue is reported net of any related sales tax. Container and Rail Lease Income. We recognize revenue from operating leases of our owned equipment as earned over the term of the lease. Where minimum lease payments vary over the lease term, revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Finance lease income is recognized using the effective interest method, which generates a constant rate of interest over the period of the lease. We cease recognition of lease revenue if and when a lessee defaults in making timely lease payments or we otherwise determine that future lease payments are not likely to be collected from the lessee. Our determination of the collectability of future lease payments is made by management on the basis of available information, including the current creditworthiness of lessees, historical collection results and review of speciﬁc past due receivables. If we experience unexpected payment defaults from our lessees, we will cease revenue recognition for those leases, which will reduce rental revenue. Management Fee Revenue. We recognize revenue from management fees earned under management agreements on a monthly basis. Fees are calculated as a percentage of net operating income, which is revenue from the equipment under management minus direct operating expense related to those units. If a lessee of a managed unit defaults in making timely lease payments or we otherwise determine that future lease payments are not likely to be collected from the lessee, then we will cease to record lease revenue for purposes of our internal record keeping in connection with determining the amount of management fees that we have earned, which in turn will result in reduced management fee revenue. 52 Logistics Revenue. We recognize logistics revenue for transportation services provided to customers. For transportation services not completed at the end of a reporting period, we use a percentage of completion method to allocate the appropriate revenue to each separate reporting period using relative transit time. We report logistics revenue on a gross basis as we are the primary obligor and responsible for providing the services desired by the customer. We are responsible for fulﬁllment, including the acceptability of the service, and have discretion in setting sales prices and as a result, our earnings may vary. We also have discretion in selecting vendors from multiple suppliers for the services ordered by our customers. Lastly, we have credit risk for our receivables. Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Our allowance for doubtful accounts is developed based on two key components: (1) speciﬁc reserves for receivables which are impaired for which management believes full collection is doubtful; and (2) a general reserve for estimated losses inherent in the receivables. The general reserve is estimated by applying certain percentages to receivables that have not been speciﬁcally reserved, ranging from 1.0% on accounts that are one to thirty days overdue, to 100% on accounts that are one year overdue. Our allowance for doubtful accounts is reviewed regularly by our management and is based on the risk proﬁle of the receivables, credit quality indicators such as the level of past due amounts and non-performing accounts and economic conditions. Changes in economic conditions or other events may necessitate additions or deductions to the allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance is intended to provide for losses inherent in the owned ﬂeet’s accounts receivable, and requires the application of estimates and judgments as to the outcome of collection efforts and the realization of collateral, among other things. The credit risk on accounts receivable related to the equipment we manage is the responsibility of third-party investors. Under our management agreements, if we are unable to ultimately collect any amount due from a managed unit lessee, third-party investors are obligated to reimburse us for any amounts we have previously paid to them in anticipation of receiving the uncollectible amount from the container lessee. Accounting for Rental Equipment Accounting for rental equipment includes depreciation and impairment testing. Depreciation. In general, we purchases new container equipment from container manufacturers for the purpose of leasing such equipment to customers. We also purchases used container equipment through sale-leaseback transactions with our customers, or equipment that was previously owned by one of our third party investors. Used equipment is typically purchased with an existing lease in place. Container equipment is recorded at cost and depreciated to an estimated residual value on a straight-line basis over its estimated useful life. The estimated useful lives and residual values of our container equipment are based on historical disposal experience and our expectations for future used container sale prices. We review our depreciation policies on a regular basis to determine whether changes have taken place that would suggest that a change in our depreciation policies, useful lives of our equipment or the assigned residual values is warranted. The estimated useful lives and residual values for the majority of our container equipment purchased new from the factory are as follows: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20-ft. standard dry van container . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40-ft. standard dry van container 40-ft. high cube dry van container . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20-ft. refrigerated container . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40-ft. high cube refrigerated container . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Residual Value $ $ $ $ $ 1,050 1,300 1,650 2,750 3,500 Depreciable Life in Years 13.0 13.0 13.0 12.0 12.0 53 Other specialized equipment is depreciated to its estimated residual value, which ranges from $1,000 to $3,500, over its estimated useful life of between 12.5 years and 15 years. For used container equipment acquired through sale-leaseback transactions, we often adjust our estimates for remaining useful life and residual values based on current conditions in the sale market for older containers and our expectations for how long the equipment will remain on-hire to the current lessee. Railcar equipment is depreciated over its estimated useful life of 43 years to its estimated residual value of $8,700 using the straight-line method. Impairment. On at least an annual basis, we evaluate our rental equipment ﬂeet to determine whether there have been any events or changes in circumstances indicating that the carrying amount of all, or part, of our ﬂeet may not be recoverable. Events which would trigger an impairment review include, among others, a signiﬁcant decrease in the long-term average market value of rental equipment, a signiﬁcant decrease in the utilization rate of rental equipment resulting in an inability to generate income from operations and positive cash ﬂow in future periods, or a change in market conditions resulting in a signiﬁcant decrease in lease rates. When testing for impairment, equipment is generally grouped by equipment type, year of manufacture and whether it is on or off-lease, and is tested separately from other groups of assets and liabilities. Potential impairment exists when the estimated future undiscounted cash ﬂows generated by an asset group, comprised of lease proceeds and residual values, less operating expenses, are less than the carrying value of that asset group. If potential impairment exists, the equipment is written down to its fair value. In determining the fair value of an asset group, we consider market trends, published value for similar assets, recent transactions of similar assets and in certain cases, quotes from third party appraisers. During the year ended December 31, 2015, our annual impairment review resulted in a charge for certain off-lease containers of $24.5 million, which is included in depreciation expense in our consolidated statement of income. No impairment charges were recorded in 2014 and 2013 as a result of our annual review. Consolidation of Container Funds We regularly perform a review of our container fund arrangements with our investors to determine whether a fund is a variable interest entity (VIE) and whether we have a variable interest that provides us with a controlling ﬁnancial interest and are the primary beneﬁciary of the VIE in accordance with ASC Topic 810, Consolidation. If the fund is determined to be a VIE, our analysis identiﬁes the primary beneﬁciary of the VIE as the entity that meets both of the following criteria under Paragraph 14A of ASC Topic 810: • • The power to direct the activities of a VIE that most signiﬁcantly impact the entity’s economic performance; and The obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could be potentially signiﬁcant to the VIE or the right to receive beneﬁts from the entity that could potentially be signiﬁcant to the VIE. If in our judgment we meet both of the above criteria, we include the VIE’s ﬁnancial statements in our consolidated ﬁnancial statements as required under ASC Topic 810. The equity attributable to the VIE is shown as a non-controlling interest on our consolidated balance sheet and the after tax result attributable to its operations is shown as net income or loss attributable to non-controlling interest on our consolidated statement of income. We currently enter into two types of container fund arrangements with investors which are reviewed under ASC Topic 810, Consolidation. These arrangements include container funds that we manage for investors and container funds that have entered into ﬁnancing arrangements with investors. Included among several of the funds that we manage, and all of the funds under ﬁnancing arrangements, are Japanese container funds that were established by CAIJ under separate investment agreements allowed under Japanese commercial laws. Each of the funds is ﬁnanced by unrelated Japanese third party investors. (See Notes 3 and 14 to our consolidated ﬁnancial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K). 54 Income Taxes Deferred tax liabilities and assets are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been reﬂected in our consolidated ﬁnancial statements. Deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the differences between the book values and the tax basis of particular assets and liabilities, using tax rates in effect for the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce our deferred tax assets to an amount we determine is more likely than not to be realized, based on our analyses of past operating results, future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences and projected taxable income. Our analyses of future taxable income are subject to a wide range of variables, many of which involve estimates. Uncertainty regarding future events and changes in tax regulation could materially alter our valuation of deferred tax liabilities and assets. If we determine that we would not be able to realize all or part of our deferred tax assets in the future, we would increase our valuation allowance and record a corresponding charge to our earnings in the period in which we make such determination. If we later determine that we are more likely than not to realize our deferred tax assets, we would reverse the applicable portion of the previously provided valuation allowance. We recognize the effect of income tax positions only if those positions are more likely than not of being sustained. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50% likely of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reﬂected in the period in which the change in judgment occurs. We record penalties and interest related to unrecognized tax beneﬁts within income tax expense. Recent Accounting Pronouncements. See Note 2(q) of our consolidated ﬁnancial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a full description of recent accounting pronouncements and our expectation of their effect on our operations and ﬁnancial condition. ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK Market risk represents the risk of changes in value of a ﬁnancial instrument, derivative or non-derivative, caused by ﬂuctuations in foreign exchange rates and interest rates. Changes in these factors could cause ﬂuctuations in our results of operations and cash ﬂows. We are exposed to the market risks described below. Foreign Exchange Rate Risk. Although we have signiﬁcant foreign-based operations, the U.S. Dollar is our primary operating currency. Thus, most of our revenue and expenses are denominated in U.S. Dollars. We have equipment sales in British Pound Sterling, Euros and Japanese Yen and incur overhead costs in foreign currencies, primarily in British Pound Sterling and Euros. CAI Consent Sweden AB, one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, has signiﬁcant amounts of revenue as well as expenses denominated in Euros and Swedish Krone. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the U.S. Dollar increased in value in relation to other major foreign currencies (such as the Euro and British Pound Sterling). The increase in the value of the U.S. Dollar has decreased our revenues and expenses denominated in foreign currencies. The increase in the value of the U.S. Dollar relative to foreign currencies will also result in U.S. dollar denominated assets held at some of our foreign subsidiaries to increase in value relative to the foreign subsidiaries’ local currencies. For the year ended December 31, 2015, we recognized a loss on foreign exchange of $0.2 million. A 10% change in foreign exchange rates would not have a material impact on our business, ﬁnancial position, results of operations or cash ﬂows. Interest Rate Risk. The nature of our business exposes us to market risk arising from changes in interest rates to which our variable-rate debt is linked. As of December 31, 2015, the principal amount of debt outstanding under variable-rate revolving credit facilities was $657.0 million. In addition, at December 31, 2015 we had balances on our variable rate term loans of $273.6 million, less than $0.1 million of variable rate capital lease obligations, and $7.6 million of variable rates loans held by a VIE. The average interest rate on our variable rate debt was 2.0% as of December 31, 2015 based on LIBOR plus a margin based on certain conditions. A 1.0% increase or decrease in underlying interest rates for these obligations will increase or decrease interest expense by approximately $9.4 million annually assuming debt remains constant at December 31, 2015 levels. 55 We do not currently participate in hedging, interest rate swaps or other transactions to manage the market risks described above. ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA The consolidated ﬁnancial statements and ﬁnancial statement schedule are contained in Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and are incorporated herein by reference. See Part IV, Item 15(a) for an index to the consolidated ﬁnancial statements and supplementary data. ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE None. ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES Management’s Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures In accordance with Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as deﬁned in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based upon their evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures, our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2015. Management has excluded ClearPointt from its assessment of the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures that are also part of internal control over ﬁnancial reporting, as of December 31, 2015, as permitted by the guidance issued by the Office of the Chief Accountant of the Securities and Exchange Commission. ClearPointt was acquired by the Company during the third quarter of 2015 and represented 4% and 0.3%, respectively, of total revenue and total assets of the related consolidated ﬁnancial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015. Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting As a result of the ClearPointt acquisition, we have commenced a project to evaluate the processes and procedures of ClearPointt’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting and incorporate ClearPointt’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting into our internal control over ﬁnancial reporting framework. Except for the activities described above, there were no changes in our internal control over ﬁnancial reporting (as such term is deﬁned in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended December 31, 2015 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over ﬁnancial reporting. Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over ﬁnancial reporting (as deﬁned in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Our internal control over ﬁnancial reporting is a process designed with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal ﬁnancial officer or persons performing similar functions to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of ﬁnancial reporting and the preparation of our ﬁnancial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over ﬁnancial reporting includes policies and procedures that: (a) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reﬂect our transactions and dispositions of assets; (b) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of ﬁnancial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and Board of Directors; and (c) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our ﬁnancial statements. 56 Because of its inherent limitations, our internal controls and procedures may not prevent or detect misstatements. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. As of December 31, 2015, our management, with the participation of our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over ﬁnancial reporting based on the framework established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this evaluation, management has determined that our internal control over ﬁnancial reporting is effective as of December 31, 2015. Management has excluded ClearPointt Logistics LLC from its assessment of internal control over ﬁnancial reporting as of December 31, 2015, as permitted by the guidance issued by the Office of the Chief Accountant of the Securities and Exchange Commission. ClearPointt was acquired by the Company during the third quarter of 2015 and represented 4% and 0.3%, respectively, of total revenue and total assets of the related consolidated ﬁnancial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015. KPMG LLP, the independent registered public accounting ﬁrm that audited our 2015 consolidated ﬁnancial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has issued an attestation report on our internal control over ﬁnancial reporting. The report appears below. 57 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors and Stockholders CAI International, Inc.: We have audited CAI International, Inc. and subsidiaries’ (the Company) internal control over ﬁnancial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). CAI International, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over ﬁnancial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over ﬁnancial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over ﬁnancial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over ﬁnancial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. A company’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of ﬁnancial reporting and the preparation of ﬁnancial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reﬂect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of ﬁnancial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the ﬁnancial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over ﬁnancial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. In our opinion, CAI International, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over ﬁnancial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company acquired ClearPointt Logistics LLC on July 27, 2015, and management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting as of December 31, 2015, ClearPointt Logistics LLC’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting which represented 4% and 0.3%, respectively, of total revenue and total assets of the related consolidated ﬁnancial statement amounts of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015. Our audit of internal control over ﬁnancial reporting of the Company also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over ﬁnancial reporting of ClearPointt Logistics LLC. 58 We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of CAI International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash ﬂows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015, and the related ﬁnancial schedule II, and our report dated March 2, 2016 expressed an unqualiﬁed opinion on those consolidated ﬁnancial statements and ﬁnancial statement schedule. /s/ KPMG LLP San Francisco, California March 2, 2016 59 ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION None. PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from our deﬁnitive proxy statement for our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be ﬁled no later than 120 days after December 31, 2015. Code of Ethics We have a written Code of Business Conduct and Ethics in place that applies to all our employees, including our principal executive officer, principal ﬁnancial officer, principal accounting officer and controller, and persons performing similar functions. A copy of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on our website at http://www.capps.com. We intend to use our website as a method of disseminating any change to, or waiver from, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics as permitted by the applicable SEC rules. ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from our deﬁnitive proxy statement for our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be ﬁled no later than 120 days after December 31, 2015. ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from our deﬁnitive proxy statement for our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be ﬁled no later than 120 days after December 31, 2015. ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from our deﬁnitive proxy statement for our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be ﬁled no later than 120 days after December 31, 2015. ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from our deﬁnitive proxy statement for our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be ﬁled no later than 120 days after December 31, 2015. 60 PART IV ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES (a)(1) Financial Statements. The following ﬁnancial statements are included in Item 8 of this report: Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 . . . . Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules. Page 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 The following ﬁnancial statement schedule for the Company is ﬁled as part of this report: Schedule II — Valuation Accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 Schedules not listed above have been omitted because the information required to be set forth therein is not applicable or is shown in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements or notes thereto. (a)(3) List of Exhibits. The exhibits set forth on the accompanying Exhibit Index immediately following the ﬁnancial statement schedule are ﬁled as part of, or incorporated by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 61 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors and Stockholders CAI International, Inc.: We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of CAI International, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash ﬂows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015. In connection with our audits of the consolidated ﬁnancial statements, we also have audited ﬁnancial statement schedule II. These consolidated ﬁnancial statements and ﬁnancial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated ﬁnancial statements and ﬁnancial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the ﬁnancial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the ﬁnancial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and signiﬁcant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall ﬁnancial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated ﬁnancial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the ﬁnancial position of CAI International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the results of their operations and their cash ﬂows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related ﬁnancial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated ﬁnancial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), CAI International, Inc.’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 2, 2016 expressed an unqualiﬁed opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting. /s/ KPMG LLP San Francisco, California March 2, 2016 62 CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (In thousands, except share information) Assets Current assets Cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash held by variable interest entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $548 and $680 at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current portion of direct ﬁnance leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restricted cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rental equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $349,810 and $274,333 at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net investment in direct ﬁnance leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $4,881 and $4,817 at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Furniture, ﬁxtures and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $2,027 and $2,019 at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total assets(1) December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014 $ 17,447 35,106 $ 27,810 26,011 55,284 21,158 15,114 144,109 7,212 1,748,211 82,210 2,905 58,022 18,150 14,806 144,799 8,232 1,564,777 76,814 — 1,223 273 674 $ 1,986,544 Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity Current liabilities Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued expenses and other current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Due to container investors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unearned revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current portion of debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current portion of capital lease obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rental equipment payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income tax liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Capital lease obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total liabilities(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 11,962 4,808 5,801 11,990 172,416 5 10,901 217,883 1,259,196 48,204 — 1,525,283 Stockholders’ equity Common stock: par value $.0001 per share; authorized 84,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 20,132,706 and 20,788,277 shares at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Additional paid-in capital Accumulated other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total CAI stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-controlling interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 148,523 (7,922) 319,735 460,338 923 461,261 $ 1,986,544 945 1,795,840 8,414 9,029 12,984 7,172 203,199 1,015 7,381 249,194 1,058,754 43,419 1,568 1,352,935 2 154,894 (5,677) 292,897 442,116 789 442,905 1,795,840 $ $ $ (1) Total assets at December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 include the following assets of certain variable interest entities (VIEs) that can only be used to settle the liabilities of those VIEs: Cash, $35,106 and $26,011; Net investment in direct ﬁnance leases, $1,915 and $156; and Rental equipment net of accumulated depreciation, $85,101 and $102,100, respectively. (2) Total liabilities at December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 include the following VIE liabilities for which the VIE creditors do not have recourse to CAI International, Inc.: Current portion of debt, $60,382 and none; Debt, $59,445 and $132,419, respectively. See accompanying notes to consolidated ﬁnancial statements. 63 CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (In thousands, except per share data) Revenue Container lease income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rail lease income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Logistics revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Management fee revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating expenses Depreciation of rental equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Storage, handling and other expenses Logistics transportation costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss (gain) on sale of used rental equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Year Ended December 31, 2014 2013 2015 $ 217,505 $ 210,756 10,336 — 6,497 227,589 17,433 11,502 3,227 249,667 $ 197,360 7,179 — 7,866 212,405 113,590 30,194 10,172 654 27,617 182,227 77,976 26,043 — (6,522) 26,538 124,035 67,109 19,257 — (7,356) 24,628 103,638 Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67,440 103,554 108,767 Other expenses Net interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income before income taxes and non-controlling interest . . . . Income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income attributable to non-controlling interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income attributable to CAI common stockholders . . . . . . . . . Net income per share attributable to CAI common stockholders Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Weighted average shares outstanding Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36,034 182 36,216 31,224 4,252 26,972 134 26,838 $ 35,205 773 35,978 67,576 7,191 60,385 111 60,274 1.29 $ 1.28 $ 2.91 2.85 $ $ $ 36,000 1,190 37,190 71,577 7,057 64,520 594 63,926 2.89 2.82 $ $ $ 20,773 20,988 20,732 21,155 22,157 22,672 See accompanying notes to consolidated ﬁnancial statements. 64 CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (In thousands) Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive income, net of tax: Foreign currency translation adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interest . . . Comprehensive income attributable to CAI common stockholders Year Ended December 31, 2014 $ 60,385 2013 $ 64,520 2015 $ 26,972 (2,245) 24,727 134 $ 24,593 (3,321) 57,064 111 $ 56,953 561 65,081 594 $ 64,487 See accompanying notes to consolidated ﬁnancial statements. 65 CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (In thousands) Common Stock Shares Amount Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Additional Paid-In Capital 2 $181,063 $ Retained Earnings Non- Controlling Interest Total Equity (2,917) $168,697 $ — 63,926 — $ 346,845 64,520 594 — — — — — — 594 111 561 1,524 (155) 1,429 107 295 415,126 60,385 — (3,321) — (31,395) 114 — 1,627 — — — 84 789 134 258 27 84 442,905 26,972 (2,245) — — (12,997) 4,744 — 1,542 — — — 373 3 (36) — 923 $ 461,261 Balances as of December 31, 2012 . . . 22,052 $ Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign currency translation — adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exercise of stock options . . . . . . . . . . Stock issuance costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock based compensation − options . . . Stock based compensation − restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — 160 — — 28 Excess tax beneﬁt from share-based compensation awards . . . . . . . . . . . — Balances as of December 31, 2013 . . . 22,240 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — Foreign currency translation adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Repurchase of common stock . . . . . . . Exercise of stock options . . . . . . . . . . Stock based compensation − options . . . Stock based compensation − restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — (1,483) 7 — 24 Excess tax beneﬁt from share-based compensation awards . . . . . . . . . . . — — Contributions and other . . . . . . . . . . . Balances as of December 31, 2014 . . . 20,788 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — Foreign currency translation adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Repurchase of common stock . . . . . . . Exercise of stock options . . . . . . . . . . Stock based compensation − options . . . Stock based compensation − restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Excess tax beneﬁt from share-based compensation awards . . . . . . . . . . . — (1,089) 415 — 21 — Payment of income tax withheld on vested restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . (2) — — — — — — — 2 — — — — 2 — — — 1,524 (155) 1,429 107 561 — — — — — — — — — 295 184,263 — — (2,356) — 232,623 — 60,274 — — — (31,395) 114 — 1,627 — (3,321) — — — 258 — — — — — — 27 — 154,894 — — — (5,677) — — 292,897 — 26,838 — — — (12,997) 4,744 — 1,542 — (2,245) — — — — — — 373 3 (36) — — — — — — — — — — Balances as of December 31, 2015 . . . 20,133 $ 2 $148,523 $ (7,922) $319,735 $ See accompanying notes to consolidated ﬁnancial statements. 66 CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (in thousands) Year Ended December 31, 2014 2013 2015 Cash ﬂows from operating activities Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 26,972 $ 60,385 $ 64,520 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of debt issuance costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unrealized loss (gain) on foreign exchange . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss (gain) on sale of used rental equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bad debt expense (recovery) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Changes in other operating assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaid expenses and other assets Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities . . . . . . . Due to container investors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unearned revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114,003 2,706 232 1,915 251 654 4,967 448 4,733 (81) (3,654) (7,183) 1,406 147,369 78,451 3,165 383 1,885 81 (6,522) 2,170 248 (6,397) 4,256 3,046 (1,831) 367 139,687 Cash ﬂows from investing activities Purchase of rental equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Acquisition of ClearPointt Logistics LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net proceeds from sale of used rental equipment Purchase of furniture, ﬁxtures and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Receipt of principal payments from direct ﬁnancing leases . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash used in investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (389,331) (4,100) 66,150 (83) 22,116 (305,248) (307,283) — 65,637 (28) 16,319 (225,355) Cash ﬂows from ﬁnancing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from debt Principal payments on debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Debt issuance costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Decrease (increase) in restricted cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Repurchase of stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock issuance costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exercise of stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Excess tax beneﬁt from share-based compensation awards . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash provided by ﬁnancing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Effect on cash of foreign currency translation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net (decrease) increase in cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash at beginning of the period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash at end of the period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 748,731 (581,739) (3,226) 1,020 (12,997) — 4,744 3 156,536 75 (1,268) 53,821 $ 52,553 372,510 (245,136) (1,999) 1,021 (31,395) — 114 27 95,142 (1,394) 8,080 45,741 $ 53,821 Supplemental disclosure of cash ﬂow information Cash paid during the period for: Income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest $ 2,340 33,124 $ 852 32,774 Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and ﬁnancing activity Transfer of rental equipment to direct ﬁnance lease . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transfer of direct ﬁnance lease to rental equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 30,604 — $ 30,178 — 67,631 3,780 780 1,536 (282) (7,356) 3,205 (227) 7,404 (3,136) (8,839) (3,774) (1,056) 124,186 (312,144) — 33,069 (60) 12,329 (266,806) 588,870 (406,961) (6,595) (4,877) — (155) 1,524 295 172,101 (1,411) 28,070 17,671 45,741 5,122 32,267 32,001 30,118 $ $ $ See accompanying notes to consolidated ﬁnancial statements. 67 CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (1) The Company and Nature of Operations CAI International, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, CAI or the Company) is a transportation ﬁnance and logistics company. The Company purchases equipment, which it leases primarily to container shipping lines, freight forwarders and other transportation companies. The Company also manages equipment for third-party investors. In operating its ﬂeet, the Company leases, re-leases and disposes of equipment and contracts for the repair, repositioning and storage of equipment. The Company’s equipment ﬂeet consists primarily of intermodal marine containers. The Company also owns a ﬂeet of railcars, which it leases in North America. On July 27, 2015, the Company purchased ClearPointt Logistics LLC (ClearPointt), a U.S.-based intermodal logistics company focused on the domestic intermodal market, for approximately $4.1 million. The Company is headquartered in Everett, Washington (see Note 4). The Company’s common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol ‘‘CAI’’. The Company’s corporate headquarters are located in San Francisco, California. (2) Summary of Signiﬁcant Accounting Policies (a) Principles of Consolidation The consolidated ﬁnancial statements include the ﬁnancial statements of the Company, its wholly-owned subsidiaries, and its 80%-owned subsidiary, CAIJ, Inc. (CAIJ). The equity attributable to the minority interest in CAIJ is shown as a non-controlling interest on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related net income is presented as net income attributable to non-controlling interest on the Company’s consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013. All signiﬁcant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company regularly performs a review of its container fund arrangements with investors to determine whether a fund is a variable interest entity (VIE) and whether the Company has a variable interest that provides it with a controlling ﬁnancial interest and is the primary beneﬁciary of the VIE in accordance with ASC Topic 810, Consolidation. If the fund is determined to be a VIE, a further analysis is performed to determine if the Company is a primary beneﬁciary of the VIE and meets both of the following criteria under Paragraph 14A of ASC Topic 810: • • it has power to direct the activities of a VIE that most signiﬁcantly impact the entity’s economic performance; and it has the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could be potentially signiﬁcant to the VIE or the right to receive beneﬁts from the entity that could potentially be signiﬁcant to the VIE. If in the Company’s judgment both of the above criteria are met, the VIE’s ﬁnancial statements are included in the Company’s consolidated ﬁnancial statements as required under ASC Topic 810, Consolidation. The equity attributable to the VIE is shown as a non-controlling interest on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet and the after tax result attributable to its operations is shown as a net income or loss attributable to non-controlling interest on the Company’s consolidated statements of income. (See Note 3). (b) Use of Estimates Certain estimates and assumptions were made by the Company’s management that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the ﬁnancial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Signiﬁcant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include revenue recognition, allowances for receivables, the carrying amount of rental equipment, the residual values and lives of rental equipment, and income tax uncertainties. Actual results could differ from those estimates. 68 CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) (c) Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment Furniture, ﬁxtures, office equipment and software, are depreciated on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives of ﬁve years with no salvage value. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of their useful lives or the respective lease life. (d) Rental equipment In general, the Company purchases new container equipment from container manufacturers for the purpose of leasing such equipment to customers. The Company also purchases used container equipment through sale-leaseback transactions with its customers, or equipment that was previously owned by one of the Company’s third party investors. Used equipment is typically purchased with an existing lease in place. Container equipment is recorded at cost and depreciated to an estimated residual value on a straight-line basis over its estimated useful life. The estimated useful lives and residual values of the Company’s container equipment are based on historical disposal experience and the Company’s expectations for future used container sale prices. The Company reviews its depreciation policies on a regular basis to determine whether changes have taken place that would suggest that a change in its depreciation policies, useful lives of its equipment or the assigned residual values is warranted. The estimated useful lives and residual values for the majority of the Company’s container equipment purchased new from the factory are as follows: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20-ft. standard dry van container . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40-ft. standard dry van container 40-ft. high cube dry van container . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20-ft. refrigerated container . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40-ft. high cube refrigerated container . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ $ $ 1,050 1,300 1,650 2,750 3,500 Residual Value Depreciable Life in Years 13.0 13.0 13.0 12.0 12.0 Other specialized equipment is depreciated to its estimated residual value, which ranges from $1,000 to $3,500, over its estimated useful life of between 12.5 years and 15 years. For used container equipment acquired through sale-leaseback transactions, we often adjust our estimates for remaining useful life and residual values based on current conditions in the sale market for older containers and our expectations for how long the equipment will remain on-hire to the current lessee. Railcar equipment is depreciated over its estimated useful life of 43 years, to its estimated residual value of $8,700 using the straight-line method. (e) Impairment of Long-Lived Assets On at least an annual basis, the Company evaluates its rental equipment ﬂeet to determine whether there have been any events or changes in circumstances indicating that the carrying amount of all, or part, of its ﬂeet may not be recoverable. Events which would trigger an impairment review include, among others, a signiﬁcant decrease in the long-term average market value of rental equipment, a signiﬁcant decrease in the utilization rate of rental equipment resulting in an inability to generate income from operations and positive cash ﬂow in future periods, or a change in market conditions resulting in a signiﬁcant decrease in lease rates. 69 CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) When testing for impairment, equipment is generally grouped by rental type, year of manufacture and whether it is on or off-lease, and is tested separately from other groups of assets and liabilities. Potential impairment exists when the estimated future undiscounted cash ﬂows generated by an asset group, comprised of lease proceeds and residual values, less operating expenses, are less than the carrying value of that asset group. If potential impairment exists, the equipment is written down to its fair value. In determining the fair value of an asset group, the Company considers market trends, published value for similar assets, recent transactions of similar assets and in certain cases, quotes from third party appraisers. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the market conditions for certain off-lease containers changed which resulted in their carrying value exceeding their fair value. The fair value was estimated based on recent gross sales proceeds for sales of similar containers and management’s judgment of market conditions. The resulting impairment charge of $24.5 million relating to the container leasing segment is included in depreciation expense in the consolidated statement of income. No impairment charges were recorded in 2014 and 2013 as a result of our annual review. (f) Intangible Assets Intangible assets with deﬁnite useful lives are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate an asset’s carrying value may not be recoverable. The Company amortizes intangible assets on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives as follows: Trademarks and tradename . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Contracts-owned equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Customer relationships 1 − 10 years 5 − 7 years 8 years (g) Goodwill In connection with the acquisition of ClearPointt Logistics LLC on July 27, 2015, the Company recorded $2.9 million of goodwill. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired in a business combination. Goodwill is not amortized but is evaluated for impairment at the reporting unit level annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that impairment may exist. The Company assesses qualitative factors such as industry and market considerations, overall ﬁnancial performance and other relevant events and factors affecting a reporting unit to determine if it is more likely than not that impairment may exist and whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. The ﬁrst step involves comparing the fair value to the carrying value of each reporting unit that has goodwill assigned to it. If the carrying value exceeds the fair value, a second step is performed to compute the amount of the impairment. The Company performed the annual impairment test during the fourth quarter of 2015 and concluded that there was no impairment of goodwill. (h) Finance Leases Interest on ﬁnance leases is recognized using the effective interest method. Lease income is recorded in decreasing amounts over the term of the contract, resulting in a level rate of return on the net investment in direct ﬁnance leases. (i) Debt Fees To the extent that the Company is required to pay issuance fees or direct costs relating to its credit facilities, such fees are amortized over the lives of the related debt using the effective interest method and reﬂected in interest expense. (j) Foreign Currency Translation The accounts of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries have been converted at rates of exchange in effect at year-end for balance sheet accounts and average exchange rates for the year for income statement accounts. The effects of changes in exchange rates in translating foreign subsidiaries’ ﬁnancial statements are included in stockholders’ equity as accumulated other comprehensive income. 70 CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) (k) Accounts Receivable Amounts billed under operating leases for equipment owned by the Company, as well as amounts due from customers for the provision of logistics services, are recorded in accounts receivable. The Company estimates an allowance for doubtful accounts for accounts receivable it does not consider fully collectible. The allowance for doubtful accounts is developed based on two key components: (1) speciﬁc reserves for receivables for which management believes full collection is doubtful; and (2) a general reserve for estimated losses inherent in the receivables. The general reserve is estimated by applying certain percentages to receivables that have not been speciﬁcally reserved, ranging from 1.0% on accounts that are one to thirty days overdue, to 100% on accounts that are one year overdue. The allowance for doubtful accounts is reviewed regularly by management and is based on the risk proﬁle of the receivables, credit quality indicators such as the level of past due amounts and non-performing accounts and economic conditions. Changes in economic conditions or other events may necessitate additions or deductions to the allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance is intended to provide for losses inherent in the company’s accounts receivable, and requires the application of estimates and judgments as to the outcome of collection efforts and the realization of collateral, among other things. Amounts billed under operating leases for equipment owned by third-party investors are also recorded in accounts receivable with a corresponding credit to due to container investors account. The credit risk on accounts receivable related to managed equipment is the responsibility of the third-party investors. Under the Company’s management agreements with investors, the third-party investors are obligated to reimburse the Company for any amounts the Company had previously paid to them in advance of receiving the amount from the equipment lessee if the Company is unable to ultimately collect any amount due from a managed equipment lessee. Accounts receivable attributable to the managed ﬂeet included in accounts receivable as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 was $4.5 million and $8.5 million, respectively. (l) Income Taxes Income taxes are accounted for using the asset-and-liability method. Under this method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the future tax consequences of differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their ﬁnancial reporting amounts at each year-end. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Valuation allowances are established when it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets will not be recovered. The Company recognizes the effect of income tax positions only if those positions are more likely than not of being sustained. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50% likely of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reﬂected in the period in which the change in judgment occurs. The Company records penalties and interest related to unrecognized tax beneﬁts within income tax expense. (See Note 11). (m) Revenue Recognition The Company provides a range of services to its customers incorporating rental, sale and management of equipment and the provision of logistics services. Revenue for all forms of service is recognized when earned following the guidelines under FASB ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition and FASB ASC Topic 840, Leases. Revenue is reported net of any related sales tax. Container and Rail Lease Revenue Lease revenue arises from renting equipment owned by the Company to various lessees. Rental agreements are typically leases with a ﬁxed term of between one and eight years or short-term master lease agreements where there is no term and the equipment can be returned at any time without penalty. Revenue is recorded on an accrual basis for master lease agreements as these agreements have no ﬁxed term. For long-term leases, revenue is recorded on a straight-line basis when earned according to the terms of the rental contracts. These contracts are classiﬁed as operating leases. Early termination of the rental contracts subjects the lessee to a penalty, which is included in lease revenue upon such termination. 71 CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) Included in lease revenue is revenue consisting primarily of fees charged to the lessee for handling, delivery, repairs, and fees relating to the Company’s damage protection plan, which are recognized as earned. Management Fee Revenue The Company recognizes revenue from management fees earned under equipment management agreements as earned on a monthly basis. Management fees are typically a percentage of net operating income of each investor group’s ﬂeet calculated on an accrual basis. Included in the Company’s balance sheet are accounts receivable from the managed ﬂeet which are uncollected lease billings related to managed equipment. All direct costs (storage, repairs, repositioning etc.) are charged to investors on a speciﬁc-identiﬁcation basis or allocated basis. The Company’s ﬁnancial statements include accounts payable and accruals of expenses related to managed equipment. The net amount of rentals billed less expenses payable, less management fees, is recorded in amounts due to container investors on the balance sheet. Logistics Revenue The Company recognizes logistics revenue for transportation services provided to customers. For transportation services not completed at the end of a reporting period, a percentage of completion method is used to allocate the appropriate revenue to each separate reporting period using relative transit time. The Company reports logistics revenue on a gross basis as it is the primary obligor and responsible for providing the services desired by the customer. The Company is responsible for fulﬁllment, including the acceptability of the service, and has discretion in setting sales prices and as a result, its earnings may vary. The Company also has discretion in selecting vendors from multiple suppliers for the services ordered by the customers. Lastly, the Company has credit risk for the related receivables. (n) Stock-Based Compensation The Company has granted stock options and restricted stock to certain directors and employees under its 2007 Equity Incentive Plan. The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, Compensation — Stock Compensation, which requires that compensation cost related to stock-based compensation be recognized in the ﬁnancial statements. The cost is measured at the date the award is granted based on the fair value of the award. The fair value of stock options is calculated using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model. The stock-based compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period of the grant on a straight-line basis. (See Note 10). (o) Repairs and Maintenance The Company’s leases generally require the lessee to pay for any damage to the equipment beyond normal wear and tear at the end of the lease term. The Company accounts for repairs and maintenance expense on an accrual basis when an obligation to pay has been incurred. (p) Recent Accounting Pronouncements In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (ASU No. 2014-09). This new standard will replace all current U.S. GAAP guidance on this topic and eliminates industry-speciﬁc guidance. Leasing revenue recognition is speciﬁcally excluded from this ASU, and therefore, the new standard will only apply to management fee revenue, sales of equipment portfolios, dispositions of used equipment and the provision of logistics services. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted for interim and annual periods beginning after December 31, 2016. Adoption of the guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated ﬁnancial statements. In February 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-02, Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendment to the Consolidation Analysis (ASU No. 2015-02). The new guidance will change (1) the identiﬁcation of variable interests (fees paid to a decision maker or service provider), (2) the variable interest entity (VIE) characteristics for a limited partnership or similar entity and (3) the primary beneﬁciary determination. The guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. The new guidance will be applied on a retrospective basis and is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated ﬁnancial statements. 72 CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs (ASU No. 2015-03). The new guidance will require debt issuance costs to be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the associated debt liability. The guidance is effective for ﬁscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those ﬁscal years, with early adoption permitted. The new guidance will be applied on a retrospective basis and is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated ﬁnancial statements. In November 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classiﬁcation of Deferred Taxes (ASU No. 2015-17). The new guidance requires that all deferred tax assets and liabilities, along with any related valuation allowance, be classiﬁed as noncurrent on the balance sheet. The guidance is effective for ﬁscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted. The new guidance may be applied either prospectively, for all deferred tax assets and liabilities, or retrospectively. The Company early adopted ASU 2015-17 effective December 31, 2015 on a prospective basis. No prior periods were retrospectively adjusted, and adoption had no impact on our results of operations. In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, Leases (ASU No. 2016-02). The new standard will replace all current U.S. GAAP guidance on this topic. The new guidance will require lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for virtually all of their leases, with the exception of leases that meet the deﬁnition of a short-term lease. Lessor accounting will remain similar to the current model. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The new guidance must be adopted using a modiﬁed retrospective transition and is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated ﬁnancial statements. (3) Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities as a Non-Controlling Interest The Company regularly performs a review of its container fund arrangements with investors to determine whether a fund is a variable interest entity (VIE) and whether the Company (a) has a variable interest that provides it with a controlling ﬁnancial interest and (b) is the primary beneﬁciary of the VIE in accordance with ASC Topic 810, Consolidation. If the fund is determined to be a VIE, a further analysis is performed to determine if the Company is a primary beneﬁciary of the VIE and meets both of the following criteria under Paragraph 14A of ASC Topic 810: • • It has power to direct the activities of a VIE that most signiﬁcantly impact the entity’s economic performance; and It has the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could be potentially signiﬁcant to the VIE or the right to receive beneﬁts from the entity that could potentially be signiﬁcant to the VIE. If in the Company’s judgment both of the above criteria are met, the VIE’s ﬁnancial statements are included in the Company’s consolidated ﬁnancial statements as required under ASC Topic 810, Consolidation. The equity attributable to the VIE is shown as a non-controlling interest on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet and the after tax result attributable to its operations is shown as a net income or loss attributable to non-controlling interest on the Company’s consolidated statement of income. The Company currently enters into two types of container fund arrangements with investors which are reviewed under ASC Topic 810, Consolidation. These arrangements include container funds that the Company manages for investors and container funds that have entered into ﬁnancing arrangements with investors. Several of the funds that the Company manages, and all of the funds under ﬁnancing arrangements, are Japanese container funds that were established by a related party under separate investment agreements allowed under Japanese commercial laws (see Note 14). Each of the funds is ﬁnanced by unrelated Japanese third party investors. 73 CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) Managed Container Funds All container funds under management by the Company are considered VIEs because as manager of the funds, the Company has the power to direct the activities that most signiﬁcantly impact the entity’s economic performance including the leasing and managing of containers owned by the funds. The fees earned for arranging, managing and establishing the funds are not signiﬁcant to the expected returns of the funds so the Company does not have a variable interest in the funds. The rights to receive beneﬁts and obligations to absorb losses that could potentially be signiﬁcant to the funds belong to the third party investors, so the Company concluded that it is not the primary beneﬁciary of the funds. Consequently the Company has not consolidated the managed container funds. The Company recognizes gain on sale of containers to the unconsolidated VIEs as sales in the ordinary course of business. No container portfolios were sold to the Japanese VIEs in the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013. Collateralized Financing Obligations As of December 31, 2015, the Company has transferred containers with a total net book value of $165.7 million at the time of transfer to Japanese investor funds while concurrently entering into lease agreements for the same containers, under which the Company leases the containers back from the Japanese investors. In accordance with ASC Topic 840, Sale-Leaseback Transactions, the Company concluded these were ﬁnancing transactions under which sale-leaseback accounting was not applicable. The container funds under ﬁnancing arrangements are considered VIEs under ASC Topic 810, Consolidation because, as lessee of the funds, the Company has the power to direct the activities that most signiﬁcantly impact each entity’s economic performance including the leasing and managing of containers owned by the funds. The terms of the transactions include options for the Company to purchase the containers from the funds at a ﬁxed price. As a result of the residual interest resulting from the ﬁxed price call option, the Company concluded that it may absorb a signiﬁcant amount of the variability associated with the funds’ anticipated economic performance and, as a result, the Company has a variable interest in the funds. As the Company has the power to direct the activities that most signiﬁcantly impact the economic performance of the VIEs and the variable interest provides the Company with the right to receive beneﬁts from the entity that could potentially be signiﬁcant to the funds, the Company determined that it is the primary beneﬁciary of these VIEs and included the VIEs’ assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the results of the VIEs’ operations and cash ﬂows for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 in the Company’s consolidated ﬁnancial statements. The containers that were transferred to the Japanese investor funds had a net book value of $87.0 million as of December 31, 2015. The container equipment, together with $35.1 million of cash held by the investor funds, has been included on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet with the offsetting liability related to the funds presented in the debt section of the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as collateralized ﬁnancing obligations of $112.3 million and term loan held by VIE of $7.6 million. See Note 9(e) and Note 9(f) for additional information. No gain or loss was recognized by the Company on the initial consolidation of the VIEs. 74 CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) (4) Acquisition of ClearPointt Logistics LLC On July 27, 2015, the Company purchased ClearPointt, a U.S.-based intermodal logistics company focused on the domestic intermodal market, for approximately $4.1 million. The Company is headquartered in Everett, Washington. ClearPointt has 22 employees and agents and over 280 customers. The acquisition was recorded during the third quarter of 2015 using the purchase method of accounting as prescribed under ASC 805, Business Combinations. Accordingly, assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their fair value estimated by management as of July 27, 2015. The purchase price for the acquisition has been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows (in thousands): Accounts receivable, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill Intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Purchase price . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,683 56 2,905 1,188 72 6,904 2,620 184 2,804 $4,100 Adjustments to record the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at fair value include the recognition of $1.2 million of intangible assets as follows: Tradename . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Customer relationships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 568 620 Amount Estimated Life 5 years 8 years The Company’s results for the year ended December 31, 2015 include the results of ClearPointt for the period since the date of acquisition. Pro forma ﬁnancial statements are not presented as they are not material to the Company’s overall ﬁnancial statements. (5) Rental Equipment The following table provides a summary of the Company’s rental equipment (in thousands): Dry containers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Refrigerated containers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other specialized equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Railcars . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accumulated depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rental equipment, net of accumulated depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . December 31, 2015 $1,392,825 308,374 152,310 244,512 2,098,021 (349,810) $1,748,211 December 31, 2014 $ 1,364,331 254,788 130,697 89,294 1,839,110 (274,333) $ 1,564,777 75 CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) (6) Net Investment in Direct Finance Leases The following table represents the components of the Company’s net investment in direct ﬁnance leases (in thousands): Gross ﬁnance lease receivables(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unearned income(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net investment in direct ﬁnance leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ December 31, 2015 124,747 (21,379) 103,368 $ December 31, 2014 116,992 (22,028) 94,964 $ $ (1) At the inception of the lease, the Company records the total minimum lease payments, executory costs, if any, and unguaranteed residual value as gross ﬁnance lease receivables. The gross ﬁnance lease receivables are reduced as customer payments are received. There was no unguaranteed residual value at December 31, 2015 and 2014 included in gross ﬁnance lease receivables. There were no executory costs included in gross ﬁnance lease receivables as of December 31, 2015 and 2014. (2) The difference between the gross ﬁnance lease receivables and the cost of the equipment or carrying amount at the lease inception is recorded as unearned income. Unearned income, together with initial direct costs, are amortized to income over the lease term so as to produce a constant periodic rate of return. There were no unamortized initial direct costs as of December 31, 2015 and 2014. In order to estimate the allowance for losses contained in the gross ﬁnance lease receivables, the Company reviews the credit worthiness of its customers on an ongoing basis. The review includes monitoring credit quality indicators, the aging of customer receivables and general economic conditions. The categories of gross ﬁnance lease receivables based on the Company’s internal customer credit ratings can be described as follows: Tier 1 — These customers are typically large international shipping lines that have been in business for many years and have world-class operating capabilities and signiﬁcant ﬁnancial resources. In most cases, the Company has had a long commercial relationship with these customers and currently maintains regular communication with them at several levels of management, which provides the Company with insight into the customer’s current operating and ﬁnancial performance. In the Company’s view, these customers have the greatest ability to withstand cyclical down turns and would likely have greater access to needed capital than lower-rated customers. The Company views the risk of default for Tier 1 customers to range from minimal to moderate. Tier 2 — These customers are typically either smaller shipping lines or freight forwarders with less operating scale or with a high degree of ﬁnancial leverage, and accordingly the Company views these customers as subject to higher volatility in ﬁnancial performance over the business cycle. The Company generally expects these customers to have less access to capital markets or other sources of ﬁnancing during cyclical down turns. The Company views the risk of default for Tier 2 customers as moderate. Tier 3 — Customers in this category exhibit volatility in payments on a regular basis. Based on the above categories, the Company’s gross ﬁnance lease receivables were as follows (in thousands): Tier 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tier 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tier 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014 $ $ 86,981 37,766 — 124,747 $ $ 89,960 27,032 — 116,992 76 CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) Contractual maturities of the Company’s gross ﬁnance lease receivables subsequent to December 31, 2015 are as follows (in thousands): 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2021 and thereafter $ 29,145 35,487 26,840 16,145 7,237 9,893 $124,747 (7) Intangible Assets The Company’s intangible assets as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 were as follows (in thousands): December 31, 2015 Trademarks and tradename . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Contracts-owned equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Customer relationships December 31, 2014 Trademarks and tradename . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Contracts-owned equipment Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Net Carrying Amount $ $ $ $ 1,840 3,644 620 6,104 1,278 3,812 5,090 $ $ $ $ (1,218) (3,644) (19) (4,881) (1,084) (3,733) (4,817) $ $ $ $ 622 — 601 1,223 194 79 273 Amortization recorded for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 was $0.2 million, $0.4 million and $0.8 million, respectively, and was included in administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of income. Estimated future amortization expenses are as follows (in thousands): 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2021 and thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 274 191 191 191 162 214 $1,223 77 CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) (8) Equipment Leases The Company leases its equipment on either short-term operating leases through master lease agreements, long-term non-cancelable operating leases, or ﬁnance leases. The following represents future minimum rents receivable under long-term non-cancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2015 (in thousands): 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2021 and thereafter $146,802 117,091 92,992 55,433 32,300 46,839 $491,457 See Note 6 for contractual maturities of the Company’s gross ﬁnance lease receivables. (9) Debt and Capital Lease Obligations Debt Details of the Company’s debt as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 were as follows (dollars in thousands): December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014 Outstanding Reference (a)(i) (a)(ii) (b)(i) (b)(ii) (b)(iii) (b)(iv) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) Current Revolving credit facility . . . . . . . . . $ Revolving credit facility − Rail . . . . . Term loan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Term loan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Term loan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Term loan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Senior secured notes . . . . . . . . . . . . Asset backed notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . Collateralized ﬁnancing obligations . . Term loans held by VIE . . . . . . . . . Short-term line of credit . . . . . . . . . Total Debt Long-term 488,000 126,000 23,700 129,750 99,440 18,881 71,105 242,875 53,697 5,748 — . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 172,416 $ 1,259,196 8,500 $ 34,500 1,800 9,000 9,940 1,119 7,175 40,000 58,553 1,829 — Average Interest Agreement Terminates Outstanding Current Long-term — $ 289,000 61,769 — 25,500 1,800 138,750 9,000 109,380 9,940 — 8,240 40,000 57,390 1,829 75,000 78,280 282,875 65,184 8,016 Average Interest 1.9% 1.9% 2.2% 1.8% 1.9% March 2020 October 2020 April 2018 October 2019 April 2017 — — December 2020 4.9% September 2022 March 2028 3.4% June 2019 0.8% June 2019 2.6% May 2016 — 1.5% 1.8% $ 1.9% 2.3% 2.2% 1.9% 3.4% 4.9% 3.4% 0.7% 2.6% — $ 203,199 $1,058,754 (a) Revolving Credit Facilities Revolving credit facilities consist of the following: (i) On March 15, 2013, the Company entered into a Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement, as amended, with a consortium of banks to ﬁnance the acquisition of container rental equipment and for general working capital purposes. On January 30, 2015, the Company entered into an amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement, pursuant to which the revolving credit facility was amended to extend the maturity date to March 15, 2020, reduce the interest rate, increase the commitment level from $760.0 million to $775.0 million, and revise certain of the covenants and restrictions to provide the Company with additional ﬂexibility. 78 CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) As of December 31, 2015, the maximum commitment under the revolving credit facility was $775.0 million. The revolving credit facility may be increased up to a maximum of $960.0 million, in accordance with the terms of the agreement, so long as no default of event of default exists either before or immediately after giving effect to the increase. There is a commitment fee on the unused amount of the total commitment, payable quarterly in arrears. The revolving credit facility provides that swing line loans (short-term borrowings of up to $10.0 million in the aggregate that are payable within 10 business days or at maturity date, whichever comes earlier) and standby letters of credit (up to $15.0 million in the aggregate) will be available to the Company. These credit commitments are part of, and not in addition to, the total commitment provided under the revolving credit facility. The interest rates vary depending upon whether the loans are characterized as Base Rate loans or Eurodollar rate loans, as deﬁned in the revolving credit agreement. Interest rates are based on LIBOR for Eurodollar loans, and Base Rate for Based Rate loans. In addition to various ﬁnancial and other covenants, the Company’s revolving credit facility also includes certain restrictions on the Company’s ability to incur other indebtedness or pay dividends to stockholders. As of December 31, 2015, the Company was in compliance with the terms of the revolving credit facility. As of December 31, 2015, the Company had $278.4 million in availability under the revolving credit facility (net of $0.1 million in letters of credit) subject to its ability to meet the collateral requirements under the agreement governing the facility. Based on the borrowing base and collateral requirements at December 31, 2015, the borrowing availability under the revolving credit facility was $93.1 million, assuming no additional contribution of assets. The entire amount of the facility drawn at any time plus accrued interest and fees is callable on demand in the event of certain speciﬁed events of default. The Company’s revolving credit facility, including any amounts drawn on the facility, is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company (not otherwise used as security for its other credit facilities) including containers owned by the Company, which had a net book value of $717.0 million as of December 31, 2015, the underlying leases and the Company’s interest in any money received under such contracts. (ii) On October 22, 2015, the Company and CAI Rail Inc. (CAI Rail), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into the Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement with a consortium of banks, pursuant to which the prior revolving credit facility was amended to extend the maturity date to October 22, 2020, reduce the interest rate, increase the commitment level from $250.0 million to $500.0 million, which may be increased up to a maximum of $700.0 million subject to certain conditions, and revise certain of the covenants and restrictions under the prior facility to provide the Company with additional ﬂexibility. As of December 31, 2015, the maximum credit commitment under the revolving line of credit was $500.0 million. Borrowings under this revolving credit facility bear interest at a variable rate. The interest rates vary depending upon whether the loans are characterized as Base Rate loans or Eurodollar rate loans, as deﬁned in the revolving credit agreement. Interest rates are based on LIBOR for Eurodollar loans, and Base Rate for Base Rate loans. As of December 31, 2015, CAI Rail had $339.5 million in availability under the revolving credit facility, subject to its ability to meet the collateral requirements under the agreement governing the facility. Based on the borrowing base and collateral requirements at December 31, 2015, the borrowing availability under the revolving credit facility was $6.8 million, assuming no additional contribution of assets. The entire amount of the facility drawn at any time plus accrued interest and fees is callable on demand in the event of certain speciﬁed events of default. The agreement governing CAI Rail’s revolving credit facility contains various ﬁnancial and other covenants. As of December 31, 2015, CAI Rail was in compliance with the terms of the revolving credit facility. CAI Rail’s revolving credit facility, including any amounts drawn on the facility, is secured by all of the assets of CAI Rail, which had a net book value of $209.1 million as of December 31, 2015, and is guaranteed by the Company. 79 CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) (b) Term Loans Term loans consist of the following: (i) On March 22, 2013, the Company entered into a $30.0 million ﬁve-year term loan agreement with Development Bank of Japan (DBJ). The loan is payable in 19 quarterly installments of $0.5 million starting July 31, 2013 and a ﬁnal payment of $21.5 million on April 30, 2018. The loan bears interest at variable rates based on LIBOR. As of December 31, 2015, the loan had a balance of $25.5 million. The following are the estimated future principal and interest payments under these loans as of December 31, 2015 (in thousands). The payments were calculated assuming the interest rate remains 2.3% through maturity of the loan. 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less: Amount representing interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Term loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,386 2,342 22,153 26,881 (1,381) $ 25,500 (ii) On December 20, 2010, the Company entered into a term loan agreement with a consortium of banks. Under this loan agreement, the Company was eligible to borrow up to $300.0 million, subject to certain borrowing conditions, which amount is secured by certain assets of the Company’s wholly-owned foreign subsidiaries. The loan agreement is an amortizing facility with a term of six years. The interest rates vary depending upon whether the loans are characterized as Base Rate loans or Eurodollar rate loans, as deﬁned in the term loan agreement. The loan bears a variable interest rate based on LIBOR for Eurodollar loans, and Base Rate for Base Rate loans. On March 28, 2013, the term loan was amended which reduced the principal balance of the loan from $249.4 million to $125.0 million through payment of $124.4 million from the proceeds of the $229.0 million ﬁxed-rate asset-backed notes issued by the Company’s indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, CAL Funding II Limited (see paragraph (d) Asset-Backed Notes below). On October 1, 2014, the Company entered into an amended and restated term loan agreement with a consortium of banks, pursuant to which the prior loan agreement was reﬁnanced. The amended and restated term loan agreement, which contains similar terms to the prior loan agreement, was amended to, among other things: (a) reduce the borrowing rates from LIBOR plus 2.25% to LIBOR plus 1.6% (per annum) for Eurodollar loans, (b) increase the loan commitment from $115.0 million to $150.0 million, (c) extend the maturity date to October 1, 2019, and (d) revise certain of the covenants and restrictions under the prior loan agreement to provide the Company with additional ﬂexibility. As of December 31, 2015, the term loan had a balance of $138.8 million. 80 CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) The following are the estimated future principal and interest payments under this loan as of December 31, 2015 (in thousands). The payments were calculated assuming the interest rate remains 2.2% through maturity of the loan. 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less: Amount representing interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Term loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 11,986 11,780 11,582 113,629 148,977 (10,227) $ 138,750 (iii) On April 11, 2012, the Company entered into a term loan agreement with a consortium of banks. The agreement, as amended, provides for a ﬁve-year term loan of up to $142.0 million, subject to certain borrowing conditions, which amount is secured by certain assets of the Company. The commitment under the loan may be increased to a maximum of $200.0 million under certain conditions described in the agreement. The term loan’s outstanding principal bears interest based on LIBOR and is amortized quarterly, with quarterly payments equal to 1.75% multiplied by the outstanding principal amount at such time. The facility contains various ﬁnancial and other covenants. The full $142.0 million has been drawn and was primarily used to repay outstanding amounts under the Company’s senior revolving credit facility. All unpaid amounts then outstanding are due and payable on April 11, 2017. As of December 31, 2015, the loan had a balance of $109.4 million. The following are the estimated future principal and interest payments under this loan as of December 31, 2015 (in thousands). The payments were calculated assuming the interest rate remains 1.9% through maturity of the loan. 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less: Amount representing interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Term loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 12,029 100,405 112,434 (3,054) $ 109,380 (iv) On December 22, 2015, the Company and CAI Rail entered into a $20.0 million ﬁve-year term loan agreement with Siemens Financial Services, Inc. (Siemens). The term loan’s outstanding principal bears interest at a ﬁxed rate of 3.4% per annum and is amortized quarterly. Any unpaid principal and interest is due and payable on December 22, 2020. The proceeds from the term loan were primarily used to repay outstanding amounts under CAI Rail’s revolving credit facility. As of December 31, 2015, the loan had a balance of $20.0 million. The following are the estimated future principal and interest payments under this loan as of December 31, 2015 (in thousands). The payments were calculated based on the ﬁxed interest rate of 3.4%. 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less: Amount representing interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Term loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,793 1,793 1,793 1,793 15,793 22,965 (2,965) $ 20,000 81 CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) The Company’s term loans are secured by rental equipment owned by the Company, which had a net book value of $356.7 million as of December 31, 2015. (c) Senior Secured Notes On September 13, 2012, Container Applications Limited (CAL), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a Note Purchase Agreement with certain institutional investors, pursuant to which CAL issued $103.0 million of its 4.90% Senior Secured Notes due September 13, 2022 (the Notes) to the investors. The Notes are guaranteed by the Company and secured by certain assets of CAL and the Company. The Notes bear interest at 4.9% per annum, due and payable semiannually on March 13 and September 13 of each year, commencing on March 13, 2013. In addition, CAL is required to make certain principal payments on March 13 and September 13 of each year, commencing on March 13, 2013. Any unpaid principal and interest is due and payable on September 13, 2022. The Note Purchase Agreement provides that CAL may prepay at any time all or any part of the Notes in an amount not less than 10% of the aggregate principal amount of the Notes then outstanding. As of December 31, 2015, the Notes had a balance of $78.3 million. The following are the estimated future principal and interest payments under the Notes as of December 31, 2015 (in thousands). The payments were calculated based on the ﬁxed interest rate of 4.9%. 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2021 and thereafter Less: Amount representing interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Senior secured notes $ 10,910 9,520 9,220 8,920 8,621 50,789 97,980 (19,700) $ 78,280 The Company’s senior secured notes are secured by rental equipment owned by the Company, which had a net book value of $101.5 million as of December 31, 2015. (d) Asset-Backed Notes On October 18, 2012, CAL Funding II Limited (CAL II), a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of CAI, issued $171.0 million of 3.47% ﬁxed rate asset-backed notes (Series 2012-1 Asset-Backed Notes). Principal and interest on the Series 2012-1 Asset-Backed Notes is payable monthly commencing on November 26, 2012, and the Series 2012-1 Asset-Backed Notes mature in October 2027. The proceeds from the Series 2012-1 Asset-Backed Notes were used to repay part of the Company’s borrowings under its senior revolving credit facility. As of December 31, 2015, the Series 2012-1 Asset-Backed Notes had a balance of $116.9 million. On March 28, 2013, CAL II issued $229.0 million of 3.35% ﬁxed rate asset-backed notes (Series 2013-1 Asset-Backed Notes). Principal and interest on the Series 2013-1 Asset-Backed Notes is payable monthly commencing on April 25, 2013, and the Series 2013-1 Asset-Backed Notes mature in March 2028. The proceeds from the Series 2013-1 Asset-Backed Notes were used partly to reduce the balance of the Company’s term loan as described in Note 9 (b)(ii) above, and to partially pay down the Company’s senior revolving credit facility. The Series 2013-1 Asset-Backed Notes had a balance of $166.0 million as of December 31, 2015. 82 CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) The following are the estimated future principal and interest payments under the Asset-Backed Notes as of December 31, 2015 (in thousands). The payments were calculated based on the weighted average ﬁxed interest rate of 3.4%. 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2021 and thereafter Less: Amount representing interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Asset-backed notes $ 48,993 47,632 46,272 44,911 43,551 85,931 317,290 (34,415) $282,875 The Company’s asset-backed notes are secured by rental equipment owned by the Company, which had a net book value of $356.4 million as of December 31, 2015. The agreements under each of the asset-backed notes described above require the Company to maintain a restricted cash account to cover payment of the obligations. As of December 31, 2015, the restricted cash account had a balance of $7.2 million. (e) Collateralized Financing Obligations As of December 31, 2015, the Company had collateralized ﬁnancing obligations of $112.2 million (see Note 3). The obligations had an average interest rate of 0.7% as of December 31, 2015 with maturity dates between March 2016 and June 2019. The debt is secured by a pool of containers covered under the ﬁnancing arrangements. The following are the estimated future principal and interest payments under the Company’s collateralized ﬁnancing obligations as of December 31, 2015 (in thousands). The payments were calculated assuming an average interest rate of 0.7% through maturity of the obligations. 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less: Amount representing interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Collateralized ﬁnancing obligations $ 59,988 18,510 25,708 10,820 115,026 (2,776) $112,250 (f) Term Loans Held by VIE On June 25, 2014, one of the Japanese investor funds that is consolidated by the Company as a VIE (see Note 3) entered into a term loan agreement with a bank. Under the terms of the agreement, the Japanese investor fund entered into two loans; a ﬁve year, amortizing loan of $9.2 million at a ﬁxed interest rate of 2.7%, and a ﬁve year, non-amortizing loan of $1.6 million at a variable interest rate based on LIBOR. The debt is secured by assets of the Japanese investor fund, and is subject to certain borrowing conditions set out in the loan agreement. As of December 31, 2015, the term loans held by the Japanese investor fund totaled $7.6 million and had an average interest rate of 2.6%. 83 CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) The following are the estimated future principal and interest payments under this loan as of December 31, 2015 (in thousands). The payments were calculated assuming the interest rate remains 2.6% through maturity of the loan. 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less: Amount representing interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Term loans held by VIE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 2,004 1,956 1,908 2,132 8,000 (423) 7,577 The Company’s term loans held by VIE are secured by rental equipment owned by the Japanese investor fund, which had a net book value of $16.4 million as of December 31, 2015. (g) Short Term Line of Credit On May 8, 2014, CAL entered into a short term uncommitted line of credit agreement. Under this credit agreement, CAL is eligible to borrow up to $75.0 million, subject to certain borrowing conditions. Loans made under the line of credit are repayable on the earlier of (a) 3 months after the loan is made, and (b) the facility termination date of May 8, 2016. Outstanding loans bear a variable interest rate based on LIBOR. The full $75.0 million was drawn and was primarily used to repay outstanding amounts under the Company’s senior revolving credit facility. As of December 31, 2015, the full $75.0 million was paid down. The agreements relating to all of the Company’s debt contain various ﬁnancial and other covenants. As of December 31, 2015, the Company was in compliance with all of its debt covenants. Capital Lease Obligations As of December 31, 2015, the Company had capital lease obligations of less than $0.1 million. The underlying obligations are denominated in Euros at ﬂoating interest rates averaging 2.8% as of December 31, 2015 with maturity dates of March 2016. The loans are secured by certain containers owned by the Company, which had a net book value of $1.2 million as of December 31, 2015. The following are the estimated future principal and interest payments under capital lease obligations as of December 31, 2015 (in thousands). The payments were calculated assuming the interest rate remains 2.8% through maturity of the loans. 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less: Amount representing interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Capital lease obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 5 5 — 5 (10) Stock — Based Compensation Plan Stock Options The Company grants stock options to certain employees and independent directors pursuant to its 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (Plan), as amended, which was originally adopted on April 23, 2007. Under the Plan, a maximum of 1,921,980 share awards may be granted. Stock options granted to employees have a vesting period of four years from grant date, with 25% vesting after one year, and 1⁄48 independent directors vest in one year. All of the stock options have a contractual term of ten years. th vesting each month thereafter until fully vested. Stock options granted to 84 CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) The following table summarizes the Company’s stock option activities for the three years ended December 31, 2015: Options outstanding, December 31, 2012 . . . . . . . Options granted − employees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Options granted − directors Options forfeited − employees . . . . . . . . . . . . Options exercised − employees . . . . . . . . . . . . Options outstanding, December 31, 2013 . . . . . . . Options granted − employees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Options granted − directors . . . . . . . . . . . . Options forfeited − employees Options exercised − employees . . . . . . . . . . . . Options outstanding, December 31, 2014 . . . . . . . Options granted − employees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Options granted − directors Options exercised − employees . . . . . . . . . . . . Options outstanding, December 31, 2015 . . . . . . . Options exercisable at December 31, 2015 . . . . . . Expected to vest after December 31, 2015 . . . . . . Number of Shares $ 1,335,680 $ 51,300 40,000 $ (3,501) $ (159,994) $ $ 1,263,485 $ 120,000 50,000 $ (5,417) $ (7,319) $ $ 1,420,749 $ 133,000 $ 50,000 (414,494) $ $ 1,189,255 $ 901,268 $ 287,987 Weighted Average Exercise Price Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years) Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands) 13.41 26.41 26.41 14.87 9.53 14.84 22.09 22.09 22.55 15.60 15.67 21.66 21.89 11.45 18.08 16.84 21.95 5.9 4.9 8.9 $ $ $ 1,022 1,022 — The aggregate intrinsic value represents the value by which the Company’s closing stock price of $10.08 per share on the last trading day of the year ended December 31, 2015 exceeds the exercise price of the stock multiplied by the number of options outstanding or exercisable, excluding options that have a zero or negative intrinsic value. The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised during 2015, 2014 and 2013, based on the closing share price on the date each option was exercised, was $4.9 million, less than $0.1 million, and $2.3 million, respectively. The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $1.5 million, $1.6 million and $1.4 million relating to stock options for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. As of December 31, 2015, the remaining unamortized stock-based compensation cost relating to stock options granted to the Company’s employees and independent directors was approximately $2.5 million which is to be recognized over the remaining weighted average vesting period of approximately 2.6 years. 85 CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) The total fair value of stock options granted to the Company’s employees and independent directors at the time of grant was approximately $1.7 million, or $9.20 per share, $1.9 million, or $11.02 per share, and $1.3 million, or $14.10 per share for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, calculated using the Black-Scholes-Merton pricing model under the following weighted average assumptions: Stock price . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exercise price . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 21.72 21.72 $ $ 22.09 $ 22.09 $ 26.41 26.41 2015 2014 2013 Expected term: Employees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Directors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expected volatility: Employees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Directors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividend yield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Risk free rate: Employees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Directors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.25 years 5.5 years 6.25 years 5.5 years 6.25 years 5.5 years 41.76% 39.50% —% 2.00% 1.85% 53.50% 44.80% —% 1.98% 1.79% 56.70% 58.60% —% 1.35% 1.16% The expected option term is calculated using the simpliﬁed method in accordance with SEC guidance. The expected volatility was derived from the average volatility of the Company’s stock over a period approximating the expected term of the options. The risk-free rate is based on daily U.S. Treasury yield curve with a term approximating the expected term of the options. No forfeiture was estimated on all options granted during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 as management believes that none of the grantees will leave the Company within the option vesting period. Restricted Stock The Company grants restricted stock to certain employees pursuant to the Plan. The restricted stock is valued based on the closing price of the Company’s stock on the date of grant and has a vesting period of four years. The following table summarizes the activity of restricted stock under the Company’s Plan: Restricted stock outstanding, December 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restricted stock granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restricted stock outstanding, December 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restricted stock granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restricted stock vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restricted stock forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restricted stock outstanding, December 31, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restricted stock granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restricted stock vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restricted stock outstanding, December 31, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Number of Shares of Restricted Stock Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value — $ $ 28,150 $ 28,150 23,500 $ (7,648) $ (1,500) $ $ 42,502 21,000 $ (15,477) $ $ 48,025 — 26.11 26.11 22.09 26.13 26.41 23.87 21.15 23.81 22.70 86 CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) The Company recognized $0.4 million, $0.3 million and $0.1 million of stock-based compensation expense relating to restricted stock for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Unamortized stock-based compensation expense relating to restricted stock as of December 31, 2015 was $0.9 million, which will be recognized over the remaining average vesting period of 2.5 years. Stock-based compensation expense is recorded as a component of administrative expenses in the Company’s consolidated statements of income with a corresponding credit to additional paid-in capital in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. (11) Income Taxes For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, net income before income taxes and non-controlling interest consisted of the following (in thousands): U.S. operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Year Ended December 31, 2014 2013 2015 $ $ 6,682 24,542 31,224 $ $ 7,853 59,723 67,576 $ $ 9,225 62,352 71,577 Income tax expense (beneﬁt) attributable to income from operations consisted of (in thousands): Current Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Deferred Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Year Ended December 31, 2014 2013 2015 (2,083) (4) 1,372 (715) 5,406 19 (458) 4,967 4,252 $ $ 3,005 62 1,954 5,021 930 247 993 2,170 7,191 $ $ 2,032 37 1,783 3,852 2,777 (469) 897 3,205 7,057 The reconciliations between the Company’s income tax expense and the amounts computed by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate of 35.0% for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 are as follows (in thousands): Computed expected tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Increase (decrease) in income taxes resulting from: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign tax differential State income tax expense, net of federal income tax beneﬁt . . Subpart F income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Increase in uncertain tax positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-deductible stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Change in valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 87 Year Ended December 31, 2014 23,651 $ $ 2015 10,928 (7,676) 220 597 17 134 (152) 184 4,252 (17,955) 55 1,106 38 112 167 17 7,191 $ $ 2013 25,052 (19,046) (514) 1,255 124 92 — 94 7,057 CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) As of December 31, 2015, the Company had $35.5 million, $18.9 million and $9.0 million of net operating loss (NOL) carry forwards available to offset future federal, foreign and state taxable income, respectively. The NOL carry forwards will begin to expire in 2035, 2017 and 2029 for federal, foreign and state income tax purposes, respectively. The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to signiﬁcant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 are presented below (in thousands): Year Ended December 31, 2015 2014 Deferred tax assets: Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued expenses and other current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unearned revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net operating loss carry forwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 123 145 436 1,812 411 13,814 16,741 (15) 16,726 Deferred tax liabilities: Intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred subpart F income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unrealized gain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net deferred tax liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 56,478 2,664 5,790 (31) 64,930 $ 48,204 $ $ 63 114 209 2,174 36 2,602 5,198 (167) 5,031 68 40,015 2,953 5,193 39 48,268 43,237 The realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. The Company’s management considers the projected future taxable income for making this assessment. Based upon the level of historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, the Company’s management believes it is more likely than not the Company will realize the beneﬁts of the deductible differences noted above. Tax attributes related to stock option windfall deductions are not recorded until they result in a reduction of cash tax payable. Our federal and state net operating losses from windfall deductions were excluded from our deferred tax balance as of December 31, 2015. As of December 31, 2015, the beneﬁt of the federal and state net operating loss deferred tax assets of $1.0 million and less than $0.1 million, respectively, will be recorded to additional paid-in capital when they reduce cash tax payable. Deferred income taxes have not been provided on the undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2015, the amount of such earnings totaled approximately $263.9 million. These earnings have been permanently reinvested and the Company does not plan to initiate any action that would precipitate the payment of income taxes thereon. The amount of income taxes that would have resulted had such earnings been repatriated is not practically determinable. 88 CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) The following table summarizes the activity related to the Company’s unrecognized tax beneﬁts (in thousands): Balance at January 1, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Increases related to prior year tax positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Increases related to current year tax positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance at December 31, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Increases related to current year tax positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Decreases related to lapsing of statute . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance at December 31, 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 140 13 35 188 119 (87) 220 The unrecognized tax beneﬁts of approximately $0.2 million at December 31, 2015, if recognized, would reduce the Company’s effective tax rate. The Company accrued potential interest and penalties of less than $0.1 million related to unrecognized tax beneﬁts for each of the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014. The Company’s tax returns, including the United States, California, New Jersey and South Carolina, are subject to examination by the tax authorities. The Company accrues for unrecognized tax beneﬁts based upon its best estimate of the additional taxes, interest and penalties expected to be paid. These estimates are updated over time as more deﬁnitive information becomes available from taxing authorities, completion of tax audits, expiration of statute of limitations, or upon occurrence of other events. The Company does not believe the total amount of unrecognized tax beneﬁt as of December 31, 2015 will increase or decrease signiﬁcantly in the next twelve months. As of December 31, 2015, the statute of limitations for tax examinations in the United States has not expired for the years ended December 31, 2011 through 2014 and California, New Jersey and South Carolina have not expired for tax returns ﬁled for the years ended December 31, 2011 through 2014. (12) Fair Value of Financial Instruments The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the immediate or short-term maturity of these ﬁnancial instruments. The Company’s collateralized ﬁnancing obligations of $112.2 million as of December 31, 2015 were estimated to have a fair value of approximately $110.9 million based on the fair value of estimated future payments calculated using the prevailing interest rates. The fair value of these ﬁnancial instruments would be categorized as Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Management believes that the balances of the Company’s revolving credit facilities of $657.0 million, term loans totaling $293.6 million, senior secured notes of $78.3 million, asset-backed notes of $282.9 million, term loans held by VIE of $7.6 million, capital lease obligations of less than $0.1 million and net investment in direct ﬁnance leases of $103.4 million approximate their fair values as of December 31, 2015. The fair value of these ﬁnancial instruments would be categorized as Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. 89 CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) (13) Commitments and Contingencies The Company utilizes certain office facilities and office equipment under non-cancelable operating lease agreements which generally have original terms of up to ﬁve years. Future minimum lease payments required under non-cancellable operating leases having an original term of more than one year as of December 31, 2015 are as follows (in thousands): Year ending December 31: 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Office Facilities and Equipment $ $ 1,398 1,154 208 45 2,805 Office facility expense was $1.5 million for both the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, and $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, and was included in administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of income. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company had one outstanding letter of credit of $0.1 million. The letter of credit guarantees the Company’s obligations under certain operating lease agreements. In addition to the rental equipment payable of $10.9 million, the Company had commitments to purchase approximately $280.1 million of rental equipment as of December 31, 2015; $123.0 million in the twelve months ended December 31, 2016, $111.6 million in the twelve months ended December 31, 2017 and $45.5 million in the twelve months ended December 31, 2018. In the ordinary course of business, the Company executes contracts involving indemniﬁcations standard in the industry and indemniﬁcations speciﬁc to a transaction such as an assignment and assumption agreement. These indemniﬁcations might include claims related to tax matters, governmental regulations, and contractual relationships. Performance under these indemnities would generally be triggered by a breach of terms of a contract or by a third-party claim. The Company regularly evaluates the probability of having to incur costs associated with these indemniﬁcations and as of December 31, 2015 there were no claims outstanding under such indemniﬁcations and the Company believes that no claims are probable of occurring in the future. (14) Related Party Transactions The Company has transferred legal ownership of certain containers to Japanese container funds that were established by Japan Investment Adviser Co., Ltd. (JIA) and CAIJ, Inc. (CAIJ). CAIJ is an 80%-owned subsidiary of CAI with the remaining 20% owned by JIA. Prior to September 30, 2013, JIA was owned and controlled by the Managing Director of CAIJ. Prior to the transfer of containers from the Company, the container funds received contributions from unrelated Japanese investors, under separate Japanese investment agreements allowed under Japanese commercial laws. The contributions were used to purchase container equipment from the Company. Under the terms of the agreements, the CAI-related Japanese entities manage the activities of certain Japanese entities but may outsource all or part of each operation to a third party. Pursuant to its services agreements with investors, the Japanese container funds have outsourced the general management of their operations to CAIJ. The Japanese container funds have also entered into equipment management service agreements and ﬁnancing arrangements whereby the Company manages the leasing activity of containers owned by the Japanese container funds. 90 CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) As described in Note 3, the Japanese managed container funds and ﬁnancing arrangements are considered VIEs. However, with the exception of the ﬁnancing arrangements described in Note 3, the Company does not consider its interest in the managed Japanese container funds to be a variable interest. As such, the Company did not consolidate the assets and liabilities, results of operations or cash ﬂows of these funds in its consolidated ﬁnancial statements. As described in Note 3, the Company has included in its consolidated ﬁnancial statements, the assets and liabilities, results of operations, and cash ﬂows of the ﬁnancing arrangements, in accordance with ASC Topic 810, Consolidation. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company purchased, and subsequently cancelled, 400,000 shares of the Company’s common stock from Mr. Hiromitsu Ogawa, the Chairman of the Board of Directors, pursuant to the Company’s share repurchase plan authorized by the Board of Directors on February 27, 2014. The shares were purchased for proceeds totaling $8.8 million, at an average price of $21.92, which represented a modest discount to the closing share price on the dates of purchase. (15) Capital Stock On April 29, 2014, the Company ﬁled a universal shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with the SEC which was declared effective by the SEC on June 19, 2014. Under this shelf registration statement, the Company may sell various debt and equity securities, or a combination thereof, to be offered from time-to-time up to an aggregate offering price of $300.0 million for all securities, and the selling stockholders may sell up to 3,000,000 shares of common stock in one or more offerings. (16) 401(k) Savings Plan The Company established a 401(k) plan in January 1995 for certain eligible employees. Company contribution to this plan was entirely at the Company’s discretion. On October 1, 2007, the Company enhanced the plan to cover all of its U.S. employees. Under the enhanced provisions of the plan, an employee may contribute up to the statutory limit of his or her salary into the plan. The Company matches employee contributions up to 4% of qualiﬁed compensation. The Company’s contribution vests immediately. Company contribution to the plan was $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 and $0.2 million for both the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. (17) Segment and Geographic Information The Company organizes itself by the nature of the services it provides which includes equipment leasing, equipment management and logistics. Previously, the Company operated in only one industry segment, equipment leasing, and therefore did not disclose separate segments. Due to the growth in CAI Rail and the acquisition of ClearPointt Logistics LLC during the current year, the Company determined that it has three reportable business segments: container leasing, rail leasing and logistics. The container leasing segment is aggregated with equipment management and derives its revenue from the ownership and leasing of containers and fees earned for managing container portfolios on behalf of third party investors. The rail leasing segment derives its revenue from the ownership and leasing of railcars. The logistics segment derives its revenue from the provision of logistics services. There are no inter-segment revenues. With the exception of administrative expenses, operating expenses are directly attributable to each segment. Administrative expenses that are not directly attributable to a segment are allocated to container or rail leasing based on the net book value of equipment in each segment. 91 CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) The following tables show condensed segment information for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, reconciled to the Company’s net income before income taxes and non-controlling interest as shown in its consolidated statements of income for such periods (in thousands): Container lease income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rail lease income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Logistics revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Management fee revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation of rental equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . Storage, handling and other expenses . . . . . . . . . Logistics transportation costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss (gain) on sale of used rental equipment . . . . Administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total other expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income before income taxes and non-controlling interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Purchase of rental equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Container lease income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rail lease income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Management fee revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation of rental equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . Storage, handling and other expenses . . . . . . . . . Gain on sale of used rental equipment . . . . . . . . Administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total other expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income before income taxes and non-controlling interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Purchase of rental equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Container Leasing 217,505 — — 3,227 220,732 108,996 27,653 — 2,276 21,969 160,894 59,838 32,919 182 33,101 Year Ended December 31, 2015 Rail Leasing Logistics $ — $ 17,433 — — 17,433 4,594 2,540 — (1,622) 3,131 8,643 8,790 3,109 — 3,109 — $ — 11,502 — 11,502 — 1 10,172 — 2,517 12,690 (1,188) 6 — 6 Total 217,505 17,433 11,502 3,227 249,667 113,590 30,194 10,172 654 27,617 182,227 67,440 36,034 182 36,216 26,737 $ $ $ 1,738,829 226,469 $ $ — $ $ $ 5,681 $ — $ $ $ 241,415 162,862 (1,194) $ $ 2,905 $ 6,300 — $ 31,224 2,905 1,986,544 389,331 Year Ended December 31, 2014 Rail Leasing Logistics — $ — — — — — — — — — — — — — $ — $ — $ Total 210,756 10,336 6,497 227,589 77,976 26,043 (6,522) 26,538 124,035 103,554 35,205 773 35,978 67,576 1,795,840 307,283 Container Leasing $ 210,756 — 6,497 217,253 75,150 23,841 (6,506) 24,180 116,665 100,588 33,212 773 33,985 $ — $ 10,336 — 10,336 2,826 2,202 (16) 2,358 7,370 2,966 1,993 — 1,993 $ 66,603 $1,708,266 $ 289,921 $ $ $ 973 87,574 17,362 $ $ $ 92 CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) Year Ended December 31, 2013 Rail Leasing Logistics Container lease income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rail lease income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Management fee revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation of rental equipment Storage, handling and other expenses . . . . . . . . . Gain on sale of used rental equipment . . . . . . . . Administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total other expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income before income taxes and $ Container Leasing 197,360 — 7,866 205,226 65,122 17,293 (7,342) 23,369 98,442 106,784 34,501 1,190 35,691 $ — $ 7,179 — 7,179 1,987 1,964 (14) 1,259 5,196 1,983 1,499 — 1,499 non-controlling interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Purchase of rental equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 71,093 293,379 $ $ 484 18,765 $ $ — $ — — — — — — — — — — — — — $ — $ Total 197,360 7,179 7,866 212,405 67,109 19,257 (7,356) 24,628 103,638 108,767 36,000 1,190 37,190 71,577 312,144 Geographic Data The Company earns its revenue primarily from intermodal containers which are deployed by its customers in a wide variety of global trade routes. Virtually all of the Company’s containers are used internationally and typically no container is domiciled in one particular place for a prolonged period of time. As such, substantially all of the Company’s long-lived assets are considered to be international, with no single country of use. The Company’s railcars, with a net book value of $234.4 million as of December 31, 2015, are used primarily to transport cargo within North America. The following table represents the geographic allocation of revenue for the periods indicated based on customers’ primary domicile (in thousands): $ $ Year Ended December 31, 2014 13,821 26,586 26,124 22,813 23,169 64,677 33,235 17,164 227,589 2015 48,103 25,811 24,919 18,937 17,703 62,702 37,353 14,139 249,667 $ $ 2013 11,605 23,956 24,353 21,727 22,781 57,421 31,493 19,069 212,405 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . United States France . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Japan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Switzerland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Korea Other Asia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other International . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 93 CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) (18) Revenue Concentration Revenue from the Company’s ten largest lessees represented 51.9%, 55.4% and 56.6% of total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Revenue from the Company’s single largest lessee, CMA CGM, accounted for 11.6%, or $29.0 million, 11.4%, or $25.9 million, and 11.2%, or $23.8 million, of total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. (19) Earnings per Share Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing income attributable to CAI common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reﬂects the potential dilution that would occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock; however, potential common equivalent shares are excluded if their effect is anti-dilutive. The following table sets forth the reconciliation of basic and diluted net income per share for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands, except per share data): Year Ended December 31, 2014 2013 2015 Numerator Net income attributable to CAI common stockholders used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 26,838 $ 60,274 $ 63,926 Denominator Weighted-average shares used in the calculation of basic earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,773 20,732 22,157 Effect of dilutive securities: Stock options and restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215 423 515 Weighted-average shares used in the calculation of diluted earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,988 21,155 22,672 Net income per share attributable to CAI common stockholders: Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 1.29 $ 1.28 $ 2.91 2.85 $ $ 2.89 2.82 The calculation of diluted income per share for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 excluded from the denominator 763,847, 600,450 and 271,300 shares, respectively, of common stock options granted to employees and directors because their effect would have been antidilutive. 94 CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) (20) Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) The following table sets forth key interim ﬁnancial information for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands, except per share amount): Dec. 31 2015 Quarters Ended Sept. 30 June 30 Mar. 31 Dec. 31 2014 Quarters Ended Sept. 30 June 30 Mar. 31 Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $65,692 $66,117 $59,366 $58,492 $58,810 $59,203 $55,312 30,815 Operating expenses . . . . . . . . . Operating (loss) income 24,497 . . . . . Net (loss) income attributable to 68,292 (2,600) 31,595 27,215 42,861 23,256 34,842 23,650 36,232 23,134 31,954 27,249 $54,264 29,671 24,593 CAI common stockholders . . (12,582) 12,989 12,889 13,542 16,162 16,395 13,446 14,271 Net (loss) income per share attributable to CAI common stockholders: Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (21) Subsequent Events $(0.62) $(0.62) $0.62 $0.62 $0.61 $0.60 $0.65 $0.64 $0.78 $0.76 $0.78 $0.77 $0.61 $0.60 $0.64 $0.63 In February 2016, the Company purchased Challenger Overseas, LLC, a New Jersey based Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier for approximately $10.8 million. In February 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a one million share increase in the previously approved share repurchase program bringing the total authorized for repurchase to two million shares. As of February 25, 2016, 410,000 shares have been repurchased at an average price of $8.43, which included 321,000 shares that were repurchased subsequent to December 31, 2015. 95 Schedule II Valuation Accounts (In thousands) Balance at Beginning of Period Net Additions (Reductions) to Expense (Deductions)* Balance at End of Period December 31, 2013 Accounts receivable, allowance for doubtful accounts . . . $ December 31, 2014 Accounts receivable, allowance for doubtful accounts . . . $ December 31, 2015 Accounts receivable, allowance for doubtful accounts . . . $ 794 $ (227) $ (64) $ 503 503 $ 248 $ (71) $ 680 680 $ 448 $ (580) $ 548 * Primarily consists of write-offs, net of recoveries and other adjustments 96 Exhibit No. Description EXHIBIT INDEX 3.1 3.2 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 10.1 10.2* 10.3* 10.4‡‡ 10.5 Amended and Restated Certiﬁcate of Incorporation of CAI International, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of our Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended, File No. 333-140496, ﬁled on April 24, 2007). Amended and Restated Bylaws of CAI International, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, ﬁled on March 10, 2009). Form of Common Stock Certiﬁcate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of our Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended, File No. 333-140496, ﬁled on April 24, 2007). Indenture, dated October 18, 2012, between CAL Funding II Limited and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, ﬁled on October 23, 2012). Series 2012-1 Supplement, dated October 18, 2012, to Indenture dated October 18, 2012, between CAL Funding II Limited and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, ﬁled on October 23, 2012). Series 2013-1 Supplement, dated March 28, 2013, to Indenture dated October 18, 2012, between CAL Funding II Limited and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, ﬁled on April 3, 2013). Note Purchase Agreement, dated March 21, 2013, among CAL Funding II Limited, Container Applications Limited, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Santander Investment Securities Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, ﬁled on April 3, 2013). Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement, dated February 16, 2007, among CAI International, Inc., Hiromitsu Ogawa, Ogawa Family Trust dated 7/06/98, Ogawa Family Limited Partnership and DBJ Value Up Fund (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of our Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended, File No. 333-140496, ﬁled on March 21, 2007). Form of Indemniﬁcation Agreement between CAI International, Inc. and each of its current executive officers and directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of our Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended, File No. 333-140496, ﬁled on April 24, 2007). 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, ﬁled on June 9, 2015). P&R Management Agreement, dated March 14, 2006, among Container Applications International, Inc., P&R Equipment & Finance Corporation and Interpool Containers Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 of our Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended, File No. 333-140496, ﬁled on March 27, 2007). Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement, dated March 15, 2013, by and among CAI International, Inc., Container Applications Limited, the lending institutions listed on Schedule I thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Union Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as syndication agents, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Union Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as joint lead arrangers and book managers, and Bank of Montreal (Chicago Branch), JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Sovereign Bank, N.A., as co-agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, ﬁled on March 21, 2013). 97 Exhibit No. Description 10.6 10.7 10.8 10.9 10.10 10.11 10.12 Amendment No. 1 to Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement, dated October 1, 2013, by and among CAI International, Inc., Container Applications Limited, Bank of America, N.A. and other lending institutions from time to time party to the Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Union Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as syndication agents, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Union Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as joint lead arrangers and book managers, and Bank of Montreal (Chicago Branch), JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Sovereign Bank, N.A., as co-agents. Amendment No. 2 to Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement, dated August 15, 2014, by and among CAI International, Inc., Container Applications Limited, Bank of America, N.A. and other lending institutions from time to time party to the Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Union Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as syndication agents, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Union Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as joint lead arrangers and book managers, and Bank of Montreal (Chicago Branch), JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Santander Bank, N.A., as co-agents. Amendment No. 3 to Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement, dated January 30, 2015, by and among CAI International, Inc., Container Applications Limited, Bank of America, N.A. and other lending institutions from time to time party to the Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, MUFG Union Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as syndication agents, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, MUFG Union Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as joint lead arrangers and book managers, and Bank of Montreal (Chicago Branch), JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Santander Bank, N.A., as co-agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, ﬁled on February 5, 2015). Amended and Restated Term Loan Agreement, dated October 1, 2014, among Container Applications Limited, CAI International, Inc., the lending institutions from time to time listed on Schedule I thereto, ING Bank N.V. and ING Bank, branch of ING-DIBA AG (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, ﬁled on October 7, 2014). Fourth Amendment to the Term Loan Agreement, dated March 28, 2013, among Container Applications Limited, CAI International, Inc., the other guarantors listed on the signature pages thereto, the lending institutions listed on the signature pages thereto, and ING Bank N.V. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, ﬁled on April 3, 2013). Term Loan Agreement, dated April 11, 2012, among Container Applications Limited, CAI International, Inc., the Lenders listed on Schedule I thereto, SunTrust Bank and SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, ﬁled on April 16, 2012). First Amendment to Term Loan Agreement, dated August 31, 2012, among Container Applications Limited, CAI International, Inc., the Lenders listed on Schedule I thereto, SunTrust Bank and SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, ﬁled on September 4, 2012). 98 Exhibit No. Description 10.13 10.14 10.15 10.16* 10.17* 10.18* 10.19* 10.20* 10.21 10.22 Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement, dated October 22, 2015, among CAI Rail, Inc., CAI International, Inc., the lending institutions from time to time listed on Schedule 1 thereto, MUFG Union Bank, N.A. and Bank of America, N.A., as joint lead arrangers and joint bookrunners, Bank of America, N.A., as syndication agent, and ING Bank, a branch of ING-Diba AG and The Huntington National Bank, as co-documentation agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, ﬁled on October 27, 2015). Contribution and Sale Agreement, dated October 18, 2012, between Container Applications Limited and CAL Funding II Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, ﬁled on October 23, 2012). Performance Guaranty, dated October 18, 2012, made by CAI International, Inc. for the beneﬁt of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, ﬁled on October 23, 2012). Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated April 29, 2011, between CAI International, Inc. and Victor Garcia (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the ﬁscal quarter ended March 31, 2011, ﬁled on May 6, 2011). Employment Agreement, dated August 20, 2013, between CAI International, Inc. and Timothy B. Page (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, ﬁled on August 23, 2013). Service Agreement, dated August 20, 2013, between Container Applications International (UK) Limited and Daniel Hallahan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, ﬁled on August 23, 2013). Chairman of the Board Compensation Agreement, dated June 5, 2009, between CAI International, Inc. and Hiromitsu Ogawa (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Amendment No. 1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the ﬁscal quarter ended June 30, 2009, ﬁled on September 21, 2009). Continuing Services Agreement, dated April 29, 2011, between Masaaki Nishibori and CAI International, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the ﬁscal quarter ended March 31, 2011, ﬁled on May 6, 2011). Stock Purchase Agreement, dated May 1, 2014, among CAI International, Inc., Hiromitsu Ogawa and the Ogawa Family Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, ﬁle on May 2, 2014). Stock Purchase Agreement, dated June 12, 2014, among CAI International, Inc., Hiromitsu Ogawa (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, ﬁle on June 13, 2014). 10.23‡‡ Multi-Year Railcar Order, dated June 29, 2015, among CAI Rail, Inc., Trinity North America Freight Car, Inc. and Trinity Tank Car, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the ﬁscal quarter ended June 30, 2015, ﬁled on August 5, 2015). 21.1 23.1 31.1 31.2 32.1 Subsidiaries of CAI International, Inc. Consent of KPMG LLP. Certiﬁcation of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a). Certiﬁcation of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a). Certiﬁcation of Chief Executive Officer Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 99 Exhibit No. Description 32.2 101 Certiﬁcation of Chief Financial Officer Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The following ﬁnancial statements, formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013; (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013; and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. * Management contract or compensatory plan. ‡‡ Conﬁdential treatment granted as to portions of this exhibit. Conﬁdential information has been omitted and ﬁled separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 100 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. Date: March 2, 2016 CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. By: /s/ VICTOR M. GARCIA Victor M. Garcia President and Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant, in the capacities indicated, on the 2nd day of March, 2016. Signature Title(s) /s/ HIROMITSU OGAWA Hiromitsu Ogawa /s/ VICTOR M. GARCIA Victor M. Garcia /s/ TIMOTHY B. PAGE Timothy B. Page /s/ MASAAKI (JOHN) NISHIBORI Masaaki (John) Nishibori /s/ GARY M. SAWKA Gary M. Sawka /s/ MARVIN DENNIS Marvin Dennis /s/ WILLIAM W. LIEBECK William W. Liebeck /s/ DAVID G. REMINGTON David G. Remington Chairman of the Board of Directors President and Chief Executive Officer, Director (Principal Executive Officer) Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) Director Director Director Director Director 101 Exhibit 21.1 CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES Subsidiary Container Applications Limited Container Applications International (U.K.) Limited Sky Container Trading, Ltd. CAI Luxembourg S.a r.l. Container Applications (Malaysia) SDN BHD Container Applications (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. CAI Deutschland GmbH Container Applications International Ltd. CAIJ, Inc. CAI Consent AB CAI International GmbH CAL Funding II Limited CAI Rail Inc. Container Applications International (Australia) Pty Ltd. CAI Logistics Inc. ClearPointt Logistics LLC Jurisdiction Barbados United Kingdom United Kingdom Luxembourg Malaysia Singapore Germany Japan Japan Sweden Germany Bermuda Delaware Australia Delaware Washington Exhibit 23.1 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors CAI International, Inc.: We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-143000, 333-159870, 333-176369, 333-187058 and 333-206102) on Form S-8 and (No. 333-195557) on Form S-3 of CAI International, Inc. of our reports dated March 2, 2016, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of CAI International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash ﬂows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015, and the related ﬁnancial statement schedule II, and the effectiveness of internal control over ﬁnancial reporting as of December 31, 2015, which reports appear in the December 31, 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K of CAI International, Inc. Our report dated March 2, 2016, on the effectiveness of internal control over ﬁnancial reporting as of December 31, 2015, contains an explanatory paragraph that states the Company acquired ClearPointt Logistics LLC on July 27, 2015, and management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting as of December 31, 2015, ClearPointt Logistics LLC’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting which represented 4% and 0.3%, respectively, of total revenue and total assets of the related consolidated ﬁnancial statement amounts of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015. Our audit of internal control over ﬁnancial reporting of the Company also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over ﬁnancial reporting of ClearPointt Logistics LLC. /s/ KPMG LLP San Francisco, California March 2, 2016 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Victor M. Garcia, certify that: Exhibit 31.1 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of CAI International, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the ﬁnancial statements, and other ﬁnancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the ﬁnancial condition, results of operations and cash ﬂows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as deﬁned in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over ﬁnancial reporting (as deﬁned in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b. Designed such internal control over ﬁnancial reporting, or caused such internal control over ﬁnancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of ﬁnancial reporting and the preparation of ﬁnancial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent ﬁscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth ﬁscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over ﬁnancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. All signiﬁcant deﬁciencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over ﬁnancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report ﬁnancial information; and b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a signiﬁcant role in the registrant’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting. Date: March 2, 2016 By: /s/ VICTOR M. GARCIA Victor M. Garcia President and Chief Executive Officer CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Timothy B. Page, certify that: Exhibit 31.2 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of CAI International, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the ﬁnancial statements, and other ﬁnancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the ﬁnancial condition, results of operations and cash ﬂows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as deﬁned in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over ﬁnancial reporting (as deﬁned in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b. Designed such internal control over ﬁnancial reporting, or caused such internal control over ﬁnancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of ﬁnancial reporting and the preparation of ﬁnancial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent ﬁscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth ﬁscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over ﬁnancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. All signiﬁcant deﬁciencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over ﬁnancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report ﬁnancial information; and b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a signiﬁcant role in the registrant’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting. Date: March 2, 2016 By: /s/ TIMOTHY B. PAGE Timothy B. Page Chief Financial Officer Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of CAI International, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 as ﬁled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Victor M. Garcia, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report presents, in all material respects, the ﬁnancial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: March 2, 2016 By: /s/ VICTOR M. GARCIA Victor M. Garcia President and Chief Executive Officer Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE AS SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of CAI International, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 as ﬁled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Timothy B. Page, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report presents, in all material respects, the ﬁnancial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: March 2, 2016 By: /s/ TIMOTHY B. PAGE Timothy B. Page Chief Financial Officer [This page intentionally left blank.] Corporate Information Directors (pictured left to right) Gary M. Sawka Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and Director Hiromitsu Ogawa Chairman of the Board of Directors William W. Liebeck Chairman of the Compensation Committee, and Director Masaaki (John) Nishibori Director David G. Remington Chairman of the Audit Committee, and Director Victor Garcia President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director Marvin Dennis Presiding Non-Management Director Corporate Headquarters Steuart Tower, 1 Market Plaza Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94105 Tel: 415 788 0100 Independent Accountants KPMG LLP Stockholder Inquiries Investor Relations Steuart Tower, 1 Market Plaza Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94105 Tel: 415 788 0100 Stock Listing Our common shares are listed on the NYSE under the symbol CAI. Legal Counsel Perkins Coie LLP 3150 Porter Drive Palo Alto, CA 94304 Stock Transfer Agent Computershare Investor Services 250 Royall Street Canton, MA 02021 Tel: 781 575 2879 Investor Center: www.computershare.com/investor Design by Michael Patrick Partners / www.michaelpatrickpartners.com Annual Report (Form 10-K) A copy of the company’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is available to stockholders, without charge, through the company’s website at www.capps.com or upon written request to the company’s headquarters. Annual Meeting The 2016 annual meeting of stockholders will be held on Friday, June 3, 2016, at 10 a.m. (PDT) at the offices of Perkins Coie, located at 3150 Porter Drive, Palo Alto, CA 94304. Website The company’s website provides access to a wide range of information about the company and our products. Please visit us at www.capps.com. Investor Relations on the Web For more information related to investing in the company, please see the Investors tab on our website at www.capps.com. This document is printed on paper certified to the environmental and social standards of the Forest Stewardship CouncilTM (FSC®). CAI International, Inc. Steuart Tower, 1 Market Plaza, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94105 415 788 0100 www.capps.com

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above