Quarterlytics / Energy / Oil & Gas Equipment & Services / Carnarvon Petroleum / FY2011 Annual Report

Carnarvon Petroleum
Annual Report 2011

CVN · ASX Energy
Claim this profile
Ticker CVN
Exchange ASX
Sector Energy
Industry Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Employees 11-50
← All annual reports
FY2011 Annual Report · Carnarvon Petroleum
Loading PDF…
C
a
r
n
a
r
v
o
n
P
e
t
r
o
l
e
u
m
L
m

i

i
t
e
d

A
n
n
u
a
l

R
e
p
o
r
t
2
0
1
1

A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T
2
0
1
1

www.carnarvon.com.au

For the financial year ended June 30, 2011
ABN 60 002 688 851

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Directors
PJ leonhardt (Chairman)
aC Cook (Chief executive officer) 
eP Jacobson (non-executive director)
nC Fearis (non-executive director) 
Wa Foster (non-executive director)

company secretary 
ra anderson 

auDitors 
Crowe Horwath Perth

CorPorate direCtory

share registry  
link market Services limited 
Ground Floor
178 St Georges terrace
Perth, Wa 6000 australia 
investor enquiries:  1300 554 474 (within australia)
investor enquiries:  +61 2 8280 7111 (outside australia) 
+61 2 9287 0303
Facsimile: 

stock exchange Listing 
Securities of Carnarvon Petroleum limited are listed on 
aSX limited.

Bankers  
australia and new Zealand Banking Group limited
national australia Bank limited 
HSBC 

asx coDe:
Cvn - ordinary shares

registereD office 
Ground Floor
1322 Hay Street
West Perth Wa 6005 
telephone: 
Facsimile: 
email:   
Website: 

+61 8 9321 2665
+61 8 9321 8867
admin@cvn.com.au
www.carnarvonpetroleum.com

CONTENTS

Chairman’s review .................................................................................................................................................... 2

Chief executive’s review ........................................................................................................................................... 3

operating and Financial review ..........................................................................................................................4-16

directors’ report ................................................................................................................................................17-27

auditor’s independence declaration ...................................................................................................................... 28

Consolidated income Statement ............................................................................................................................ 29

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive income .............................................................................................. 30

Consolidated Statement of Financial Position ....................................................................................................... 31

Consolidated Statement of Changes in equity ....................................................................................................... 32

Statement of Cash Flows  ....................................................................................................................................... 33

notes to the Financial Statements  ...................................................................................................................34-69

directors’ declaration ............................................................................................................................................. 70

independent audit report ..................................................................................................................................71-72

Corporate Governance Statement .....................................................................................................................73-74

additional Shareholder information ..................................................................................................................75-76

Carnarvon Petroleum limited 1

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CHairman’S revieW

We are pleased to report that our operational results have enabled us to record an after tax profit of 
$2.2 million for the 2011 financial year after writing off exploration expenditure totalling $11.2 million. 
the $13.4 million profit before exploration expenditure written off is slightly less than the equivalent 
2010 financial year result of $14.8 million. over the last five reporting periods, Carnarvon has reported 
accumulated net profits after tax in excess of $58 million and generated cash to sustain a very active 
field and development programme together with our exploration activities. Carnarvon has achieved 
this result by carefully managing its exploration commitments and conservatively carried only $6.0 
million for exploration assets on its balance sheet at 30 June 2011.

initiatives  to  improve  the  stability  and  predictability  of 
production in the future will involve focusing on increasing 
the proportion of production from sandstone reservoirs that 
typically flow at more stable rates for longer periods than 
production  from  volcanic  reservoirs.    a  key  characteristic 
of the sandstone reservoirs is that they do not provide the 
rapid pay back enjoyed from the volcanic reservoirs, which 
flow at higher initial rates. Consequently we have consumed 
capital on this endeavor during the year and plan to continue 
this investment in 2012 as we pursue this re-weighting in 
the production mix in the short to medium term.

during the year Gaffney, Cline & associates endorsed the 
operator’s 2P reserve estimates at over 20 million barrels 
net to Carnarvon. this was a 16% decline on the previous 
year’s  estimate,  but  nonetheless  represents  a  substantial 
reserve position for the Company.

We again offer our thanks to Pan orient energy Corp, the 
operator  of  our  production  asset  in  thailand,  for  their 
ongoing efforts in what has been a challenging year.  

during  the  year  Carnarvon,  as  operator,  completed  two 
exploration wells in the l20/50 Concession in thailand which 
did  not,  however,  encounter  hydrocarbons  in  commercial 
quantities.  after a period of significant effort acquiring and 
interpreting  new  seismic  data  and  then  undertaking  these 
exploration  wells  we  were  naturally  disappointed  not  to 
have  obtained  a  more  encouraging  result.    However,  since 
completing  the  wells  we  have  received  some  encouraging 
new  information  in  relation  to  geochemical  analysis  of 
drill  samples  and  new  discoveries  in  the  region  that  has 
the  Carnarvon  team  re-assessing  their  previous  leads 
and  prospects  in  this  Concession.    i  would  like  to  thank 
the  Carnarvon  team  for  their  efforts  this  year  in  diligently 
pursuing and safely executing this and several other projects.

of  undertaking  drilling  activities  in  2012  and  2013.  the 
Phoenix  asset  situated  150km  north  of  Port  Hedland  has 
created  particular  excitement  within  the  Carnarvon  team 
as  the  preliminary  3d  data  supports  several  multi  tCF 
recoverable prospects and well log data and regional field 
assessments also suggest potential for condensate. 

in  my  last  review  i  referred  to  the  Board  changes  that 
actually  occurred  during  the  2011  financial  year  in  terms 
of the retirement of Ken Judge and the appointment of Bill 
Foster.  this year Bill has made a considerable contribution 
to  the  Board  and  brings  to  us  extensive  and  invaluable 
industry experience.  

the  Board  was  sorry  to  announce  in  June  2011  the 
retirement  of  ted  Jacobson,  who  has  been  central  to  the 
growth of the Company since joining some five years ago. 
However, we have been fortunate to retain his services as a 
non-executive director and to have secured his continuing 
technical support of the Carnarvon management team on a 
consultancy basis.

Clearly the current year has been difficult for Carnarvon’s 
shareholders and the Board acknowledges their concerns. 
However the outlook for Carnarvon is more optimistic. We 
have an excellent portfolio of development and exploration 
opportunities  including  the  exciting  Phoenix  asset.  i  can 
assure  you  that  our  entire  team  is  fully  committed  to  the 
development  of  stable  sandstone  production  in  thailand 
and the continued exploration programs.

We  also  advanced  a  number  of  other  assets  toward  the 
testing  of  their  prospectivity.    of  particular  note  is  the 
work undertaken in preparing for and acquiring seismic in 
permits in australia, indonesia and thailand, in anticipation 

peter Leonhardt
Chairman

2

2011 annual rePort

BaCK to ContentS

CHieF eXeCutive’S revieW

Carnarvon’s strategy is to build a profitable company, from 
a diversified portfolio of exploration and production assets, 
which create value for shareholders over the long term.

in the near term the Company is focussed on the delivery of 
production and steady cashflow from its onshore thailand 
assets.

We are also focussed on advancing Carnarvon’s exploration 
portfolio  within  and  outside  of  thailand.  in  this  regard  we 
have made significant progress on several fronts this year, 
including  the  work  undertaken  over  the  series  of  Phoenix 
blocks in the Carnarvon Basin, offshore Western australia 
and the rangkas block, onshore in indonesia.

We  continue  to  seek  attractive  acquisition  opportunities 
in  prolific  oil  and  gas  basins  in  South  east  asia  and 
australia.  our  focus  is  on  conventional  hydrocarbons 
that  are  either  onshore  or  in  shallow  offshore  waters  and 
include exploration opportunities and producing assets with 
production appraisal or exploration upside.

during  the  2011  financial  year  Carnarvon  conducted  its 
first  operated  drill  program  with  the  completion  of  the 

tapao Kaew and Krai thong exploration wells in the l20/50 
Concession,  onshore  thailand.  We  are  currently  studying 
the  results  of  these  wells  and  considering  the  results  of 
recent geochemical analysis from well samples. We are also 
incorporating this work into reprocessed seismic data before 
determining the forward exploration plans for this region.

in addition to the l20/50 Concession wells, Carnarvon was 
involved in the continuous drilling and production operations 
at  the  non-operated  l33/43  and  l44/43  Concessions  in 
thailand  and  the  drilling  of  the  tuatara-1  well  offshore  
new Zealand.

Carnarvon was also actively engaged in seismic exploration 
activities  through  the  financial  year,  commencing  or 
completing seismic acquisition in australia, indonesia and 
thailand.

overall, during the 2011 financial year Carnarvon: 

•	 participated	in	the	drilling	of	25	wells;
•	 acquired	1,250	km	of	2D	seismic;
•	 acquired	1,160	km2	of	3D	seismic;
•	 produced	731,544	bbls	of	oil.	

BaCK to ContentS

Carnarvon Petroleum limited 3

oPeratinG and FinanCial revieW

permit summary

permit

Basin

equity

Joint Venture
partner(s)

partner
interest

indicative forward
program

thailand

SW1a

Phetchabun

40%

Pan orient energy *

l33/43

Phetchabun

40%

Pan orient energy *

l44/43

Phetchabun

40%

Pan orient energy *

l20/50

Phitsanulok

l52/50

l53/50

Surat-Khiensa

Surat-Khiensa

australia

Wa-435-P

roebuck

Wa-436-P

roebuck

Wa-437-P

roebuck

Wa-438-P

roebuck

50%

50%

50%

50%

50%

50%

50%

Sun resources
raisama

Pearl oil resources*

Pearl oil resources*

Finder exploration*

Finder exploration*

Finder exploration*

Finder exploration*

Wa-443-P

roebuck

100%

eP321

Perth

eP407

Perth

2.50% of 
38.25% (i)

2.50% of 
42.5% (i)

Wa399P

Carnarvon

13%

apache * 
rialto energy 
Jacka resources

indonesia

rangkas

West Java

25%

lundin Petroleum
tap oil

new Zealand  

PeP38524

taranaki

10%

aWe*
roC oil
Kea oil and Gas

note:  (*)  denotes operator where Carnarvon is non-operator partner
(i)  Carnarvon has an overriding royalty interest in these assets

60%

60%

60%

42.5%
7.5%

50%

50%

50%

50%

50%

50%

60% 
12% 
15%

50%
24%

60%
20%
10%

Production, development, 
appraisal
Production, appraisal, 
exploration
Production, development, 
appraisal, exploration
Post well G&G studies 
Seismic planning

Seismic acquisition and interpretation

Seismic acquisition and interpretation

interpretation, 
Farmout

G & G Studies

interpretation, 
Farmout

G & G Studies

G & G Studies

appraisal

appraisal

interpretation

interpretation

Post well review

4

2011 annual rePort

BaCK to ContentS

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
oPeratinG and FinanCial revieW

thaiLanD

L44/43, L33/43 &, sW1a phetchaBun Basin (“Wichian Buri proJect”)
(Carnarvon Petroleum 40%, Pan Orient 60% operator) 

Wichian Buri summary
as outlined in the following table, Carnarvon participated in 
the drilling of 22 individual boreholes (excluding sidetracks) 
within  the  l33/43,  l44/43  and  SW1a  Concessions  during 
the  reporting  period,  resulting  in  13  wells  producing  at 
commercial  rates  and  several  new  oil  pool  discoveries. 

new discoveries were found in volcanic reservoirs at l33-1, 
l33-2,  WBeXt  WBv1  and  WBeXt  WBv2  and  in  sandstone 
reservoirs at WBeXt “d”, “e” and “F”.  

new production licenses were also granted over the l33-1 & 
2 discoveries (“l33 Pl”) and the WBeXt discoveries (“WBeXt 
Pl”). there are now a total of eight production licenses. the 
pre-existing  licences  are  Wichin  Buri  licence  i  and  ii,  na 
Sanun, Si thep, na Sanun east and Bo rang north. 

Figure 1. Permit map of Thailand.

Figure 2. Location of oilfields and prospects within the Wichian 
Buri Project – Phetchabun Basin.

BaCK to ContentS

Carnarvon Petroleum limited 5

oPeratinG and FinanCial revieW

Well

Q1

l33-1

l33-2

field

l33

l33

fy 2010/11 ave. 
production rate 
(bbl/d)

spud Date

new volcanic field discovery and first production from the l33/43 concession. tested at up to 1,100 bopd 
from the WBv1 volcanic.

7/4/2010

new volcanic field discovery in l33/43 concession, approximately 1.8 km south of l33-1. tested at rates up 
to 2,400 bopd from the WBv1 volcanic. at the completion of the 90 day production test, the well was shut-in 
and sidetracked to evaluate the WBv1 volcanic in the l33-2 area. Production recommenced in april 2011.

7/28/2010

372

109

tuatara-1

nZ

drilled to a total measured depth of 1,911 metres, during which minor oil shows were intermittently reported 
over  the  interval  1,790  –  1,850  metres.  Wireline  logs  were  run,  but  no  zones  of  economic  potential  were 
identified.

7/28/2010

0

WBeXt-1

WBeXt-1a

WBeXt-1B

WBeXt-2

WBeXt-2a

Q2

WBeXt-1C

WBeXt Concession l44 new field discovery producing from the WBv1 volcanic reservoir. the well was tested at rates 
up to 2,500 bopd under a 90 day production test which expired in november 2010. the well recommenced 
production when the production licence was granted in February 2011.

7/14/2010

1471

WBeXt new pool discovery in the WBv2 volcanic in the WBeXt field. Well produced up to 5,300 bopd during a 90 
day production test period until december. the well was shut in until the production licence was granted in 
February 2011. Well production was choked back as a result of water incursion. 

8/7/2010

WBeXt new  pool  discovery  (sandstone  reservoir)  in  the  WBeXt  field.  Well  produced  up  to  550  bopd  during  a  90 
day production test period until mid december 2010. the well was shut in until the production licence was 
granted in February 2011.

8/31/2010

WBeXt exploration / appraisal well initially tested gas at rates up to 3.0 million cubic feet per day from the WBv2 
volcanic. the well was deepened to target a potential oil leg but failed to encounter quality reservoir. the 
well was sidetracked and subsequent testing of the WBv2 volcanic  resulted in a brief oil flow. the well is 
currently suspended.

9/16/2010

WBeXt exploration  well  targetting  the  WBv3  lower  volcanic  zone  in  the  WBeXt  area.  the  original  wellbore  and 
subsequent  sidetrack  both  encountered  reasonable  thickness  reservoir  with  good  oil  shows  but  testing 
indicated both zones were tight. 

9/27/2010

984

239

0

0

WBeXt appraisal well for the WBv1 volcanic reservoir. initially tested at 3,500 bopd but water incursion in January 
2011 reduced the production rate. Subsequently shallower sandstone reservoir sections were perforated and 
the well is now on production as a sandstone development well.

11/2/2010

940

WBeXt-3

WBeXt WBv1 volcanic zone tested and found to be tight. the shallower sandstone zones produced water on test.

11/14/2010

WBeXt-4

WBeXt exploration well encountered a sandstone approximately 14 metres thick at a shallow depth of around 400 m 
tvd. Subsequent testing resulted in low flows due to the waxy crude and low temperature from this shallow 
reservoir.

12/7/2010

WBeXt-4a

WBeXt exploration well and subsequent sidetrack targeting the as yet unproven WBv3 volcanic which was found to 

12/14/2010

be tight. the well also tested a sandstone section and is on production at low rates.

WBeXt-1d

WBeXt appraisal well targetting multiple sandstone zones in the WBeXt area. the well tested both gas and oil from 
the “d” and “e” sands. Commingling of several reservoir sections has resulted in cyclic production of up to 
75 bopd.

18/12/2010

Q3

nSe-e4

nSe

tapao 
Kaew-1

l44-F

l20/50

l44

l44-e

l44

exploration well targetting a potential volcanic reservoir below the main nSe Central reservoir. a 30 metre 
thick  volcanic  was  encountered  with  good  oil  shows  but  subsequent  testing  resulted  in  minor  oil  with 
significant formation water. 

1/27/2011

Several sands were intersected in the shallower sections however analysis of wireline logs, cutting samples, 
gas readings and other data indicates the sands are not hydrocarbon bearing.

exploration well targeting both sandstone and volcanic reservoirs encountered sands without an effective top 
seal resulting in only water bearing sands. the presence of good quality sandstone reservoir is encouraging 
for future exploration in this area.

exploration well six kilometres north of l44-F  was targetting multiple stacked sandstones but the drilling 
was halted early to test a shallow volcanic reservoir with high gas readings and mud losses. the zone was 
tested but only produced water. the well is currently suspended and will be re-entered to test the original 
deeper sandstone targets at a later date.

1/31/2011

2/12/2011

2/23/2011

Krai-thong-1

l20/50 Wireline testing of several zones of potential hydrocarbon bearing intervals have proved water as the mobile 

2/28/2011

fluid and led the joint venture to the decision to plug and abandon the well.

Si thep-3

Si thep exploration well for sandstone target failed to encounter reservoir quality sand and was abandoned.

3/17/2011

Q4

l33-4

l33

exploration well targetting the WBv1 volcanic around 2.2 km north of the l33-2 oil well. the well is currently 
suspended as a sub commercial oil discovery.

4/16/2011

WBeXt-1e

WBeXt appraisal well of the WBeXt “e” sandstone tested at rates between 200 and 300 bopd and was subsequently 

4/30/2011

put on full production.

WBeXt-1F

WBeXt discovery of new “d” and “e” sandstone reservoir pools in the WBeXt-1F fault compartment. While the “e” 

5/11/2011

sand flowed predominantly gas the “d” sand has been placed into production.

WBeXt-4B

WBeXt exploration well encountered good oil shows in several sands however subsequent testing resulted in sub-

6/5/2011

commercial oil flows. the well remains open to work over to test other reservoir zones.

WBeXt-2B

WBeXt

the  original  appraisal  well  to  the  2010  WBeXt  WBv2  discovery  was  abandoned  due  to  stuck  downhole 
equipment and a subsequent sidetrack flowed initially on test at rates up to 1,100 bopd.

6/17/2011

Poe-6a

l44

appraisal well to the 2006 Poe-6 discovery producing from the “G” sandstone at rates around 80 bopd.

6/22/2011

0

52

7

58

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

213

65

0

0

0

6

2011 annual rePort

BaCK to ContentS

oPeratinG and FinanCial revieW

Wichian Buri proDuction faciLities
Carnarvon  and  its  partner  in  the  Wichian  Buri  group  of 
fields employ low cost, fit for purpose facilities designed to 
extract, process, transport and sell the produced crude as 
efficiently as possible.

the efficiency begins at the surface location, with multiple 
well clusters being drilled from central well sites. Well sites 
are purchased with flexibility in mind, such that during the 
exploration  phase  maybe  only  one  or  two  well  cellars  are 
developed  but  expansion  is  possible  with  extension  of  the 
well pads (see Figure 7 for example of multiple producing 
wells from a single site).

the operator of the permits has been continuously drilling 
in  the  region,  with  up  to  three  rigs  at  a  time,  since  2006 
and has an enviable record of safety, performance and cost 
control.  the  primary  drilling  rig  used  by  the  operator  has 
exhibited superior performance over the past year and the 
drilling  rig  company  has  indicated  that  a  second  rig  may 
be available in october 2011 if required. Wells are typically 
drilled very efficiently and for low cost.

extraction  of  the  oil  is  via  one  of  three  main  methods: 
free  flow  during  the  initial  flush  production,  electrical 
Submersible Pumps (“eSP”) for high rate wells and simple 
pumpjacks for low rate wells.

on site the oil, water and gas are separated via right-sized 
heater treater units. Water is temporarily stored on site in 
water knockout tanks before eventual transfer to centrally 
located  water  injection  wells.  as  at  the  end  of  the  2011 
financial  year,  the  capacity  of  the  water  injection  wells  is 
around 12,000 bfpd with redundancies built in via multiple 
injection  pumps  and  wells.  the  joint  venture  continues  to 
monitor  water  injection  capacities  to  ensure  sufficient 
excess.

the  separated  gas  is  used  onsite  as  fuel  for  the  heater 
treater separator systems, as heat for the storage tanks to 
prevent waxing of the crude, and as fuel for reciprocal gas 
engines to generate power for onsite pumps. any remaining 
gas is flared.

the  crude  is  stored  on-site  in  various  tank  systems.  the 
tanks come in individual 100 barrel, 200 barrel, 1,000 barrel 
and  2,000  barrel  sizes  and  are  moveable  around  sites.  in 
this  way  facilties  can  be  very  rapidly  put  together  to  test 
different rate wells and be reused as required. across the 
various well sites in the area, the joint venture has around 
50,000 barrels of storage, of which supplemental tank farms 
represents  around  half,  allowing  for  5-10  days  of  storage 
across all the locations.

Figure 3. Production site layout incorporating (from left) pumpjack, heater treater, water knockout tank, crude storage tanks 
and offloading to road tanker.

BaCK to ContentS

Carnarvon Petroleum limited 7

the crude is pumped into 200 barrel road tankers on-site 
and  transported  generally  to  Bangkok  for  sale  to  local 
refineries. tankers are leased from at least three different 
companies.

the facilities are rapidily scalable across the various sites 
and also as a complete system. this ensures that the right 
size facilities are in place and that costs are kept as low as 
possible.

Wichian Buri proDuction 
Production  from  the  Wichian  Buri  suite  of  fields  varied 
throughout the financial year due primarily to wells coming 
off  flush  production  (a  characteristic  of  volcanic  wells  as 
detailed in previous annual reports), wells requiring shut-in 
because of legislative requirements and then not recovering 
and natural field decline. 

oil  production  for  the  past  financial  year  averaged  4,994 
BoPd gross (1,998 BoPd net to Carnarvon).

oPeratinG and FinanCial revieW

Figure 4. Safely and environmentally contained wellsites.

Figure 5. Fit for purpose lifting and treatment methods.

Figure 6. Small footprint, easily transportable drilling rig.

Figure 7. Multiple production wells per location.

8

2011 annual rePort

BaCK to ContentS

oPeratinG and FinanCial revieW

L20/50 phitsanuLok Basin
(Carnarvon  Petroleum  50%  Operator,  Sun  Resources  42.5%, 
Peak Oil & Gas 7.5%)

Krai  thong-1  was  drilled  in  February  2011  and  wireline 
testing  of  several  zones  of  potential  hydrocarbon  bearing 
intervals proved water as the mobile fluid and led the joint 
venture to the decision to delay drilling of the third well.

Post well analysis of cuttings indicates a working petroleum 
system may be present in the block and has encouraged the 
joint venture to reprocess the available data.

all three locations are still available for drilling. Casing and 
completion  equipment  are  still  part  of  the  joint  venture’s 
working capital and a drilling rig is stacked on location. this 
capability  enables  the  joint  venture  to  rapidly  remobilise 
and commence drilling if the current studies, reprocessing 
and post well analysis prove up a valid drilling prospect.

L52/50 anD L53/50 surat-khiensa Basin
(Carnarvon Petroleum 50%, Pearl Oil 50% operator)

the  exploration  Concessions  l52/50  and  l53/50  onshore 
thailand were officially awarded to Carnarvon and Pearl in 
march 2010. l52/50 covers an area of 3,085 km2 and l53/50 
covers an area of 3,872 km2.

Figure 8. L20/50 Phitsanulok basin outline.

the l20/50 Concession, granted in January 2007, is situated 
approximately  30  kms  to  the  southeast  and  on  trend  with 
the  largest  onshore  oil  field  in  thailand  at  Sirikit.  the 
permit  is  around  60  kms  to  the  west  of  Carnarvon’s  40% 
owned  Wichian  Buri  producing  assets.  the  concession 
covers 4,000 km2 and is lightly explored. 

acquisition of 550 kms of 2d seismic data was completed in 
2009. Processing and interpretation of the new 2d seismic 
data was completed by early 2010.

Significant sedimentary section and structuring are evident 
in  the  new  data,  and  play  types  include  Sirikit  style  fans, 
Wichian Buri style sandstones and na Sanun style volcanics.

three drillable prospects were identified from a seriatum of 
over 20 leads, and two wells were drilled in the concession 
in early 2011.

tapao Kaew-1 was drilled in January 2011 and several sands 
were intersected in the shallower sections of the well. rig 
site analysis of wireline logs, cutting samples, gas readings 
and  other  data  indicated  the  sands  were  not  hydrocarbon 
bearing. 

Figure 9. L52/50 and L53/50 concessions showing current 
2D seismic acquisition.

BaCK to ContentS

Carnarvon Petroleum limited 9

oPeratinG and FinanCial revieW

these  blocks  are  situated  in  the  tertiary  Surat-Khiensa 
Basin  in  the  isthmus  of  southern  thailand  adjacent  to 
the  nne-oriented ranong  and Khlong marui  Fault Zones. 
the basin is of particular interest as it is on trend with the 
similar sized Chumphon Basin in the Gulf of thailand to the 
immediate  north.  the  Chumphon  Basin  has  a  proven  oil 
kitchen and 4.3 mm bbls of oil was recovered from the nang 
nuan  B  well  from  1994-1997  at  rates  up  to  10,000  bopd. 
numerous  wells  in  the  Chumphon  Basin  encountered  oil 
shows.

Some leads have been identified on the limited 2d seismic 
available.

three  oil  and  gas  exploration  wells  have  been  drilled  in 
l52/50 Concession in addition to two very shallow coalbed 
methane  wells.  one  well  has  been  drilled  in  the  l53/50 
Concession. one of the wells drilled in l52/50 Concession 
(PK-1) is reported to have encountered gas.

Preparations for the acquisition of up to 500 km of 2d seismic 
data across the combined l52/50 & l53/50 Concessions are 
well advanced, with land permitting and up-hole drilling in 
progress. 

it is anticipated that the new seismic data will be acquired, 
processed  and  interpreted  in  2011  in  order  to  generate 
prospects for drilling in 2012.

austraLia

Wa-435-p, Wa-436-p. Wa-437-p & Wa-438-p offshore 
northWest sheLf
(Carnarvon Petroleum 50%, Finder Exploration 50% operator)

the Wa-435-P, Wa-436-P, Wa437-P and Wa-438-P permits 
contain  the  Phoenix-1  and  Phoenix-2  gas  discoveries  with 
contingent and prospective resources, in the order of several 
tCFs of gas close to onshore pipeline infrastructure at Port 
Hedland.  Central to the appraisal of these discoveries is the 
acquisition and interpretation of new 3d and 2d seismic data.

in  late  2010  operations  commenced  for  the  acquisition  of 
1,100 km2 of new, multi-client 3d seismic data over the area 
highlighted below.  the 3d seismic data are being acquired 
specifically to assist in the appraisal of the Phoenix gas field 
in  Wa-435-P  and  to  target  other  identified  gas  prospects 
and leads in Wa-435-P and the adjacent Wa-437-P permit.  

in conjunction with the 3d seismic programme, 407 km of 
2d  seismic  data  was  also  acquired,  providing  important 
well ties and new data over key leads in the area.  

the  Phoenix  3d  &  2d  seismic  survey  finished  acquisition 
on 16 February 2011 with the processed 3d dataset being 
delivered in July 2011.

Processing of the Phoenix 3d seismic survey is scheduled 
for  completion  in  3rd  quarter  2011,  with  detailed  velocity 
analyses  and  migration  being  carried  out.  this  will  be 
followed by detailed reservoir analysis and remapping of the 
Phoenix and Phoenix South structural complex in the Wa-
435-P  permit  and  also  the  large  roc  Prospect  and  other 
follow-up leads in the Wa-437-P permit.

in conjunction with the 3d seismic programme, 407 km of 
2d  seismic  data  was  also  acquired,  providing  important 
well ties and new data over key leads in the area. Seismic 
re-processing  of  pre-existing  2d  seismic  over  the  Bandy 
and other leads in the area is also underway. 

in  addition,  a  regional  airborne  gravity  and  magnetics 
survey,  recorded  over  the  western  blocks  in  the  Bedout 
Sub-basin,  was  also  interpreted  during  the  June  quarter 
and has provided a regional set of maps to complement the 
seismic interpretation.

the four permits are situated in the north-western part of 
the  Bedout  Sub-basin  within  the  greater  roebuck  Basin, 
offshore  Western  australia.    the  blocks  lie  in  an  under-
explored  area  that  has  received  little  recent  attention, 
between the prolific Carnarvon Basin hydrocarbon province 
to  the  southwest  and  the  Browse  Basin  to  the  northeast.  
the  town  of  Port  Hedland  lies  approximately  150  km  to 
the  south  of  the  permits  and  Broome  lies  250  km  to  the 
northeast.  Water depths range from 35 to 265 metres and 
the permits cover a very large area of more than 21,000 km² 
(268 graticular blocks).

Figure 10. North West Shelf permit map.

10

2011 annual rePort

BaCK to ContentS

oPeratinG and FinanCial revieW

a  large  middle  triassic  prospect,  Jaubert,  has  previously 
been recorded in the block as a faulted anticlinal closure. the 
structural  form  and  size  of  Jaubert  are  comparable  to  the 
adjacent Phoenix group of potentially large gas accumulations. 

Carnarvon  acquired  1,500  km  of  reprocessed  2d  seismic 
data during the 2011 financial year.

Geological and geophysical studies are being carried out in 
conjunction with similar work in the Phoenix permits.

Wa-399-p – austraLia offshore northWest sheLf
(Carnarvon Petroleum 13%, Apache Energy 60% and 
Operator,Jacka Resources 15% and Rialto Energy 12%)

the  Wa-399-P  exploration  permit  was  awarded  on  7  may 
2007.  the  permit  covers  an  area  of  50km²  and  is  situated 
offshore Western australia within the exmouth Sub Basin. 
the  block  is  adjacent  to  the  Pyrenees  oil  development,  a 
joint  venture  between  BHP  Billiton  and  apache,  which 
commenced oil production in march 2010. nearby, there are 
several  producing  oil  fields  including  enfield  and  vincent/
van  Gogh,  as  well  as  macedon  gas  field  and  a  number  of 
other oil field discoveries as set out below.

apache energy, as operator, acquired 3d seismic data over the 
whole permit in late 2010 and into early 2011. the 3d seismic 
data  acquisition  exceeds  the  existing  minimum  exploration 
commitment obligation under the exploration permit’s terms. 

the  newly  acquired  3d  seismic  data  is  being  processed 
and  the  interpretation,  anticipated  to  be  complete  at  the 
end  of  2011,  will  enable  the  Joint  venture  to  further  de-
risk a number of existing prospects that have already been 
mapped within the permit. 

only six wells have been drilled in the permits to date.  the 
two  wells,  Phoenix-1  and  Phoenix-2,  drilled  on  the  large 
Phoenix structure in Wa-435-P both intersected extensive 
gas columns within lower-porosity, mid-triassic reservoirs.  
in  particular,  Phoenix-1  recorded  110  metres  of  net  gas-
bearing  section.  Further  work  is  required  to  determine 
whether  the  gas  discovery  at  Phoenix  could  flow  at 
commercial rates.  a larger, untested structure in Wa-435-P 
lies directly on trend with the Phoenix structure, 5 to15 km 
to the southwest. Further to the southeast in Wa-437-P lies 
yet  another  large,  untested  structure.    regional  geology 
suggests that reservoir quality improves southward toward 
these prospects, but this model will need to be confirmed 
by  drilling.  these  triassic  structures  have  significant 
potential, of the order of several tCFs of recoverable gas, if 
exploration and appraisal drilling are successful. 

Wa-443-p austraLia offshore northWest sheLf
(Carnarvon Petroleum 100% Operator)

in april 2010 Carnarvon was successful in its bid for 100% 
of  a  new  exploration  permit  gazetted  by  the  australian 
government,  Wa-443-P,  offshore  Western  australia.  this 
permit  is  situated  adjacent  to  Carnarvon’s  four  existing 
permits Wa-435-P, Wa-436-P, Wa-437-P and Wa-438-P, in 
which it holds a 50% interest, within the Bedout Sub-Basin. 

the block covers an area of approximate 7,300 km2.

no previous drilling has taken place in the Wa-443-P block. 
the structural form and size of the prospect are comparable 
to the Phoenix group of potentially large gas accumulations. 
Carnarvon  has  secured  this  new  permit  with  a  firm 
programme  over  three  years  to  reprocess  and  interpret 
1,400 km of 2d seismic. Geological and geophysical studies 
will also be carried out in conjunction with similar work in 
the Phoenix permits.

Figure 11. North West Shelf leads and prospects.

Figure 12. WA-399-P permit map.

BaCK to ContentS

Carnarvon Petroleum limited 11

oPeratinG and FinanCial revieW

inDonesia

rangkas psc onshore JaVa
(Carnarvon Petroleum 25%, Lundin Petroleum 51% and 
Operator, Tap Oil 24%)

in September 2009, Carnarvon successfully entered into the 
rangkas PSC onshore indonesia. the proximity to Jakarta 
ensures  that  even  modest  oil  and  gas  accumulations  can 
potentially be commercialized.

the  exploration  block  covers  an  area  of  almost  4,000  km2 
and, while containing direct evidence of live oil from seeps 
in the block, has limited recent exploration, with the most 
recent well drilled around 20 years ago.

Within the permit the tuatara-1 well was drilled, targeting 
a  significant  structure.  While  the  well  recorded  gas  and 
oil shows over an extensive interval no zones of economic 
potential were identified.

Figure 14. New Zealand permit map.

reserVe assesment 

petroLeum resource cLassification, 
categorisation anD Definitions
Carnarvon  calculates  reserves  and  resources  according 
the  SPe/WPC/aaPG/SPee11  Petroleum  resource 
to 
management System (“SPe-PrmS”) definition of petroleum 
resources. this definition was first published in 1997 by the 
SPe, and in an effort to standardise reserves reporting, has 
been further clarified by the SPe-PrmS in 2007. Carnarvon 
reports reserves in line with aSX listing rules.

Figure 13. West Java permit map.

during  the  2011  financial  year  around  500  km  of  new  2d 
seismic  data  was  acquired,  processed  and  interpreted,  in 
order to better delineate the 12 significant leads identified 
from the reprocessing of 1000 km of existing 2d data.

the interpretation has highgraded several leads which are 
geologically promising with significant volumes in the 20-80 
mm bbls range gross (5 to 20 mm bbls net to Carnarvon). 
the joint venture is expected to progress one of these leads 
to a drillable prospect with drilling anticipated for 2013.

neW ZeaLanD

proved

proDuction

reserVes

proved & 
probable

contingent  
resources

prospectiVe  
resources

proved, 
prob & 
possible

commercial

Discovered, 
but not 
currently 
commercial

exploration 
prospectivity

pep38524 offshore taranaki
(Carnarvon Petroleum 10%, AWE 60% and Operator, ROC Oil 
20%, Kea Oil and Gas 10%)

1 

during the financial year, Carnarvon farmed into exploration 
block  PeP  38254  offshore  new  Zealand  in  the  southern 
taranaki Basin.

Society of Petroleum Engineers (“SPE”); World Petroleum Council 
(“WPC”); American Association of Petroleum Geologist (“AAPG”) & Society 
of Petroleum Evaluation Engineers (“SPEE”)
This report is based on information which has been compiled by the 
Company’s Chief Operating Officer, Mr Philip Huizenga, who is a full-time 
employee of the Company. Mr Huizenga is qualified in accordance with ASX 
Listing Rule 5.11 and has consented to the form and context in which this 
statement appears.

12

2011 annual rePort

BaCK to ContentS

 
proVeD anD proBaBLe (2p) reserVes thaiLanD
Carnarvon’s  reserves  base  has  been  certified  by  an 
independent  reserves  auditor.  over  the  last  few  years 
Gaffney,  Cline  and  associates  (“GCa”)  has  performed  this 
service  in  line  with  end  of  calendar  year  requirements 
for  the  department  of  mineral  Fuels  (“dmF”)  in  thailand. 
GCa certified 20.4 million barrels of 2P oil reserves net to 
Carnarvon as at 31 december 2010. 

net carnarvon reserves

proved

1p
(million  
bbls)

proved  
+ probable

2p
(million  
bbls)

proved  
+ probable  
+ possible

3p
(million  
bbls)

GCa 31 dec  
2010

4.7

20.4

51.9

a  breakdown  of  the  major  reservoirs  net  to  Carnarvon  is 
given below.

net carnarvon reserves

31-Dec-09

proved + probable

2p

(million bbls)

nSe Central

nSe-F1

Bo rang - B

Bo rang - a

l44-W

nSe South

Wichian Buri - SSt

Si thep - SSt

WBext - volc

WBext - SSt

l33 - volc

l33-SSt

other

total

1.2

2.2

3.7

1.7

0.9

0.7

1.0

0.5

2.2

1.4

2.4

1.4

1.0

20.4

reservoir 
type

volcanic

volcanic

volcanic

volcanic

volcanic

volcanic

Sandstone

Sandstone

volcanic

Sandstone

volcanic

Sandstone

various

oPeratinG and FinanCial revieW

these reservoirs are schematically reproduced below.

Figure 15. Map showing location of contingent resources.

contingent resources 
Contingent resources are those quantities of petroleum which 
are  estimated,  on  a  given  date,  to  be  potentially  recoverable 
from  known  accumulations,  but  which  are  not  currently 
considered to be commercially recoverable.

it is generally recommended that if the degree of commitment 
is not such that the accumulation is expected to be developed 
and  placed  on  production  within  a  reasonable  timeframe, 
the  estimated  recoverable  volumes  for  the  accumulation  be 
classified as contingent resources.

the Phoenix discovery is one such contingent resource, where 
the evaluation of the accumulation is still at an early stage.

net carnarvon contingent resources

Best

estimate
recoverable
million bbls / boe (Bscf)

42.5 (247)

42.5

phoenix 
Discovery

carnarvon 30 
Jun 2011

BaCK to ContentS

Carnarvon Petroleum limited 13

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
oPeratinG and FinanCial revieW

prospectiVe resources
under the SPe-PrmS definitions prospective resources can 
also be classified as exploration resources. 

Carnarvon has an increasing number of exploration licences. 
these exploration licences are evaluated using techniques like 
gravity and magnetic surveys, geochemical surveys, seismic 
surveys  and  basin  analysis.  this  analysis  results  in  a  long 
list of leads and drillable prospects. only drillable prospects 
which  have  the  likelihood  of  being  included  on  drilling 
schedules in the near future are categorised as prospective 
resources  by  Carnarvon.  leads  are  identified  as  potential 
hydrocarbon  accumulations  that  will  require  additional 
study  before  they  are  matured  to  prospects  and  appear  in 
drilling  plans.  it  is  important  to  realise  that  prospects  and 
leads carry exploration risks, which result in a chance of not 
finding commercial hydrocarbons. these risks are identified 
by  Carnarvon  and  help  management  in  ranking  exploration 
priorities.

at the time of writing this report Carnarvon has a seriatim 
of leads in a number of exploration blocks, most notably in 
the Phoenix blocks in australia, the rangkas block onshore 
indonesia and the l20/50, l33/43 and l44/43 Concessions 
in  thailand.  those  leads  which  have  been  upgraded  to 
prospects and tentatively placed within a drilling program, 
and  for  which  prospective  (unrisked)  volumes  have  been 
calculated, have been used to generate the table below. While 
Carnarvon  continues  to  carry  other  leads  with  significant 
potential recoverable hydrocarbon volumes within the other 
exploration  blocks  in  thailand,  australia  and  indonesia, 
none of those have near term drilling programs. Carnarvon 
continues  the  process  of  undertaking  additional  work  to 
progress those leads to drillable prospects.

net carnarvon prospective resources

Best

estimate

recoverable (unrisked)

million bbls / boe (Bscf)

170 (987)

42

6

20 

10

248

Phoenix South

Wichian Buri  
volcanics

Wichian Buri  
Sandstone

l20/50

rangkas PSC

carnarvon 30 
Jun 2010

sustainaBiLity

Carnarvon  is  very  aware  of  the  effects  of  the  oil  and 
gas  industry  on  the  environment  and  its  communities.  
Carnarvon  takes  all  reasonable  steps  to  mitigate  any 
potential  risk,  as  well  as  providing  several  benefits  to  the 
local communities that it operates in.

Carnarvon  continues  to  develop,  review  and  improve  its 
integrated Safety management System (imS) that is designed 
to  protect  the  environment,  its  communities  and  all  staff 
and contractors that are directly or indirectly employed by 
Carnarvon.    this  safety  management  system  has  the  full 
support  and  backing  from  all  levels  of  management.    all 
relevant campaigns that are run and operated by Carnarvon 
adhere to this safety system.

during  this  financial  year  Carnarvon  has  been  directly 
involved,  as  operator,  in  the  drilling  of  two  wells  in  its 
onshore  thailand  Concession  l20/50.  this  campaign 
consisted of well planning, construction of three well pads 
with up to 10Km of supporting roads, followed by the drilling 
of the two wells.  this campaign reported zero lti’s (lost 
time incidents). 

enVironment
Carnarvon carried out an environmental impact assessment 
(eia) prior to commencing its l20/50 drilling campaign.  this 
assessment covered all aspects of the environment, waste 
management through to local community involvement and 
opinion. an independent company was employed to monitor 
our  compliance  with  the  eia  and  submit  a  report  to  the 
thai authorities on our performance. due to the nature of 
the surrounding area, which is mainly agricultural, a high 
importance  was  put  on  protecting  this  environment.    We 
operated  a  “zero  discharge”  campaign  and  monitored  the 
water table before, during and after the campaign.

community
Carnarvon  builds  close  relationships  with  the 
local 
communities  that  it  works  in.  We  strive  to  involve  the 
community  as  much  as  possible,  through  employment, 
communication and cultural activities. We give full respect 
to all areas of the community, we respect the people, their 
culture  and  their  heritage.  We  continue  to  support  local 
schools in the region and during recent flooding in the area 
Carnarvon provided food and basic survival kits to support 
families dislodged from their dwellings.

14

2011 annual rePort

BaCK to ContentS

 
 
 
 
 
oPeratinG and FinanCial revieW

during the recent campaign we employed in excess of 150 
locals  in  varying  roles  from  construction  to  security  and 
drilling staff. We used local contractors and local materials 
as  much  as  practicable  throughout  this  campaign  to 
stimulate the local economy. 

the  ten  near  miss  incidents  (nmi)  were  recorded  and 
corrections to operating procedure made, this is a function 
of our Safety management System.

random Breath test

281

1*

negative

positive

Carnarvon  also  sponsors  the  Petroleum  engineering 
department  at  Curtin  university,  educating  the  petroleum 
engineers of the future.

* Disciplinary action followed.

heaLth anD WeLLBeing
We  value  our  staff  as  one  of  our  greatest  assets.    due  to 
the nature of Carnarvon’s operations, staff are required to 
have  a  pre-travel  medical  for  the  specific  region  they  are 
travelling to. Staff are also offered an annual health check 
as part of an ongoing commitment.

safety 
We  continue  to  encourage,  and  actively  support,  all  staff 
members  to  have  the  basics  of  first  aid,  which  gives  a 
benefit not only to the company but also to protecting their 
families, friends and others in the community. 

during the l2050 drilling campaign all safety reports were 
audited with the following results:

man hours  
worked

avg  
poB

Lti

nmi

Construction  
Phase

drilling  
Phase

54844

65892

71

90

0

0

0

10

economic
Carnarvon currently has 2P reserves of 20.4 million barrels 
as of 31 december 2010. ongoing production of the l44/43, 
l33/43  and  SWia  Concessions  in  thailand  provides  the 
Company  with  a  sustainable  economic  outlook.  Further 
commentary on economic Sustainability is provided in the 
Financial review below.

risk management
Carnarvon  has  a  robust  risk  management  framework 
developed in accordance with the international standards for 
risk  management  “aS/nZS  iSo  31000:2009”.  this  enables 
us  to  continually  review  and  address  risks  as  they  arise. 
all  business  and  operational  risks  are  assessed  against 
financial, health & safety, natural environment, community, 
reputation and legal compliance criteria allowing Carnarvon 
to grow in a sustainable risk management framework.

BaCK to ContentS

Carnarvon Petroleum limited 15

oPeratinG and FinanCial revieW

financiaL reVieW

continueD profitaBiLity
the  Group  has  now  been  profitable  for  four  consecutive 
financial years. Profit after tax for the year ended 30 June 
2011  was  $2,159,000.  development  has  continued  in  the 
Wichian Buri project in thailand and the Group is expected 
to remain profitable in the foreseeable future, with retained 
profits  being  made  available  for  the  exploration  and 
appraisal of the Company’s other assets.

2011

2010

change

Production  
(bbls)

731,544

868,450

Sales ($’000)

54,750

65,230

Cost of sales

18,891

21,473

16%

16%

12%

the decline in production is the main driver of the decrease 
in  sales  in  the  30  June  2011  financial  year.  a  portion  of 
cost of sales is fixed and as a result, cost of sales did not 
decrease in line with sales.

the  exploration  expenditure  written  off  during  the  2011 
financial  year  consists  of  $7,856,000  in  relation  to  the 
exploration expenses incurred in the l20/50 concession to 
date and $3,391,00 for the tuatara well drilled in PeP 38254. 

between 30 June 2010 and 30 June 2011 and depreciation 
and amortization charges. 

With  the  increase  in  development  costs  carried  forward, 
there  has  been  an  increase  in  deferred  tax  liabilities 
recognised  in  the  financial  statements.  these  liabilities 
are  due  to  temporary  differences  between  income  tax 
deductions and amortization with respect to the Company’s 
oil and gas assets in thailand. the deferred tax component 
of the income tax expense does not incur any cash obligation 
to the thai tax authorities in the current period.

new  venture  costs  of  $983,000  and  exploration  and 
evaluation  expenditure  of  $10,851,000  demonstrate 
Carnarvon’s continued efforts to add producing assets to its 
portfolio.  Further  detail  on  Carnarvon’s  new  ventures  and 
exploration can be found in the operating review on page 4.

the impact of the appreciating austraLian DoLLar
the  appreciating  australian  dollar  over  the  financial  year 
has  had  a  material  impact  on  the  financial  statements 
of  the  Company.  the  unrealised  foreign  exchange  loss  of 
$4,463,000 was as a result of the strengthening australian 
dollar  against  the  translation  of  united  States  dollar 
denominated cash reserves held by the Company.

BaLance sheet
the Company spent $20,460,000 on the development of the 
producing  fields  in  thailand.  the  balance  sheet  shows  an 
increase in oil and gas assets of $1,506,000.  the difference 
was  due  to  a  translation  adjustment  resulting  from  the 
strengthening of the australian dollar against the thai Baht 

the  exchange  differences  arising  in  translation  of  foreign 
operations  occurred  due  to  the  appreciating  australian 
dollar  against  the  thai  Baht.  the  balance  sheet  of  the 
Whichian  Buri  assets  are  denominated  in  thai  Baht 
resulting  in  exchange  differences  at  year  end  on  their 
conversions into australian dollar presentational currency.

16

2011 annual rePort

BaCK to ContentS

direCtorS’ rePort

the directors present their report together with the financial report of the Group, being the Company, its controlled entities, 
and the Group’s interest in jointly controlled assets, for the financial year ended 30 June 2011, and the auditor’s report thereon.

Carnarvon Petroleum limited is a listed public company incorporated and domiciled in australia.

Directors

the names and details of the Company’s directors in office at any time during or since the end of the financial year are as 
follows.  directors were in office for this entire period unless otherwise stated.

PETEr J LEONhardT
Chairman
FCa, FaiCd (life)

appointed as a director on 17 march 2005 and appointed Chairman in april 2005.  

mr leonhardt is an independent company director and adviser with extensive business, financial and corporate experience.  
He is a Chartered accountant and a former Senior Partner with PricewaterhouseCoopers and managing Partner of Coopers 
& lybrand in Western australia.  

during the past three years mr leonhardt has served as a director of the following listed companies: Cti logistics limited 
(from	 August	 1999);	 Centrepoint	 Alliance	 Limited	 (from	 May	 2002	 to	 June	 2009).	 	 He	 is	 also	 a	 director	 of	 the	 Western	
australian institute for medical research and the Cancer research trust.

mr leonhardt is a member of the audit Committee and the remuneration Committee.

adriaN C COOk
Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director
B Bus, Ca, mappFin

appointed as a director on 1 July 2011

adrian  has  25  years  experience  in  commercial  and  financial  management,  primarily  in  the  petroleum  industry. 
immediately  prior  to  joining  Carnarvon,  adrian  was  the  managing  director  of  Buru  energy  limited,  an  aSX  listed 
oil  and  gas  exploration  and  production  company  with  interests  in  the  Canning  Basin  in  Western  australia.  adrian 
has  also  held  senior  executive  positions  within  Clough  limited’s  oil  and  gas  construction  business  and  was  on  the 
executive  committee  at  arC  energy  limited,  an  aSX  listed  mid  cap  oil  and  gas  exploration  and  production  company.  

adrian joined Carnarvon on 2 november 2009 and was appointed to the Board on 1 July 2011. 

BaCK to ContentS

Carnarvon Petroleum limited 17

 
direCtorS’ rePort

Edward (TEd) P JaCObSON
Non-Executive Director
B.Sc (Hons Geology)

appointed as a director on 5 december 2005. 

mr Jacobson is a petroleum geophysicist with 39 years’ experience in petroleum exploration principally in the european 
north Sea, South east asia, South america and australia. Within australia he has been responsible for initiating a number 
of petroleum discoveries within the Cooper Basin, Barrow Sub Basin and timor Sea. in 1986, ted established the consulting 
company exploration Study Projects Pty ltd which advised companies on new venture opportunities in australia and South 
east asia and assisted in capital raisings and corporate activity.  in 1991 ted was co-founder of discovery Petroleum nl and 
from 1996 co-founder and technical director of tap oil ltd which grew to a market capitalisation of over $400 million under 
his technical leadership. ted retired from tap in September 2005.

during the past three years mr Jacobson has served as director of the following listed companies: rialto energy limited 
(from July 2006 to november 2009). mr Jacobson was also a director of Smart rich energy Finance (Holdings) ltd (from 
January 2007 to november 2007), listed on the Hong Kong Stock exchange.

mr Jacobson retired as Chief executive officer on 30 June 2011.

NEiL C FEariS
Non-Executive Director
ll.B (Hons), FaiCd, F Fin 

appointed as a director on 30 november 1999.  

mr Fearis has over 33 years’ experience as a commercial lawyer in the uK and australia.  

during the past three years mr Fearis has served as a director of the following listed companies: Kresta Holdings limited 
(from	1997	to	December	2009);	Perseus	Mining	Limited	(from	2004);	Liberty	Resources	Limited	(from	June	2007	to	November	
2008);	 Magma	 Metals	 Limited	 (from	 October	 2009);	 and	 Tiger	 Resources	 Limited	 (from	 May	 2011).	 Mr	 Fearis	 is	 also	 a	
member of several professional bodies associated with commerce and law.  

mr Fearis is Chairman of the audit Committee and Chairman of the remuneration Committee.

wiLLiam (biLL) a FOSTEr
Non Executive Director
Be (Chemical)

appointed as a director on 17 august 2010.

Bill is an engineer with extensive technical, commercial and managerial experience in the energy industry over a 40 year 
period. He has been an advisor to a major Japanese trading company for the last 20 years in the development of their global 
e&P and lnG activities and has spent time prior to this working internationally in the development of a number of energy 
companies.

Bill  is  a  director  of  red  river  resources  limited  and  was  a  former  independent  director  of  tap  oil  ltd  and  of  the  e&P 
companies that were formed through his advisory services to the Japanese trading company.

mr Foster is a member of the audit Committee and the remuneration Committee.

18

2011 annual rePort

BaCK to ContentS

noteS to tHe FinanCial StatementS
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

company secretary

mr robert anderson was appointed Company Secretary in november 2005. mr anderson is a Chartered accountant who has 
previously held company secretarial positions in both aSX-listed companies and private entities. 

Directors’ meetings

the number of directors’ meetings held and attended by each of the directors during the reporting period was as follows:  

Peter leonhardt

ted Jacobson

neil Fearis

Bill Foster 

Ken Judge

(a)

(b)

9

9

9

7

-

9

9

9

7

-

(a)  number of meetings held during period of office
(b)  number of meetings attended

auDit committee

Names and qualifications of Audit Committee members
the  Committee  is  to  include  at  least  3  members  from  1  July  2009.  Current  members  of  the  committee  are  neil  Fearis 
(Chairman of the audit Committee), Peter leonhardt, and Bill Foster. mr Judge retired as a member on 15 July 2010 and mr 
Foster was appointed on 17 august 2010.Qualifications of audit Committee members are provided in the directors section 
of this directors’ report. 

Audit Committee meetings
the number of audit Committee meetings held and attended by the members during the reporting period was as follows: 

Peter leonhardt

neil Fearis

Bill Foster

Ken Judge

(a)

(b)

2

2

2

-

2

2

2

-

(a)  number of meetings held during period of office
(b)  number of meetings attended

BaCK to ContentS

Carnarvon Petroleum limited 19

direCtorS’ rePort

remuneration report (auDiteD)

rEmuNEraTiON COmmiTTEE
the  remuneration  Committee  currently  comprises  neil  Fearis  (Chairman),  Peter  leonhardt,  and  Bill  Foster.  mr  Judge 
retired as a member on 15 July 2010 and mr Foster was appointed on 17 august 2010.

Qualifications of remuneration Committee members are provided in the directors section of this directors’ report. 

Remuneration Committee meetings
the number of remuneration Committee meetings and the number attended by each of the members during the reporting 
period were as follows:

neil Fearis (Chairman

Peter leonhardt

Bill Foster

Ken Judge

(a)

(b)

2

2

2

-

2

2

2

-

(a)  number of meetings held during period of office
(b)  number of meetings attended

the remuneration Committee is responsible for the compensation arrangements for directors and executives of the Company. 
the remuneration Committee considers compensation packages and policies applicable to the executive directors, senior 
executives  and  non-executive  directors’  fees.  in  certain  circumstances  these  include  incentive  arrangements  including 
employee share plans, incentive performance packages, and retirement and termination entitlements.

Principles of compensation 
total non-executive directors’ fees are approved by shareholders and the remuneration Committee is responsible for the 
allocation of those fees amongst the individual members of the Board.  

the remuneration Committee assesses the appropriateness of the nature and amount of compensation on an annual basis 
by reference to industry and market conditions, and with regard to individual performance and the Company’s financial and 
operational results.  Such assessments are also made after referring to the recommendations of specialist consultancy 
firms, industry groups, government and shareholder bodies. the Board obtains, when required, independent advice on the 
appropriateness of remuneration packages, given trends in comparative companies both locally and internationally. 

the remuneration Committee ultimately determines its compensation practices in terms of their effectiveness to attract, 
retain and incentivize appropriately qualified and experienced directors and senior executives.

remuneration  arrangements  are  made  having  regard  to  the  number  and  composition  of  staff  in  the  business  and  the 
stage  of  development  of  the  Company.  remuneration  arrangements  include  a  mix  of  fixed  and  performance  based 
remuneration.  Performance  based  remuneration  comprises  short  term  and  long  term  incentive  schemes.  Short  term 
incentive arrangements are designed to incentivise superior individual achievement over a period of around twelve months 
and typically comprise cash payments or share issues, as the remuneration Committee considers appropriate.  long term 
incentive arrangements are share-based and designed to be simple, clear and strongly aligned between shareholder and 
executive interests over the medium to longer term.

remuneration structures take into account the overall level of compensation for each director and executive, the capability 
and  experience  of  the  directors  and  senior  executives,  the  executive’s  ability  to  control  the  financial  performance  of  the 
relative business segment, the Group’s performance (including earnings and share price), and the amount of any incentives 
within each executive’s remuneration.

20

2011 annual rePort

BaCK to ContentS

direCtorS’ rePort

remuneration report (auDiteD) (continueD)

on 1 august 2008 the Board adopted a policy that prohibits those that are issued share-based payments as part of their 
remuneration from entering into other arrangements that limit their exposure to losses that would result from share price 
decreases.  the  Company  requires  all  executives  and  directors  to  sign  annual  statements  of  compliance  with  this  policy 
throughout the preceding year. 

in considering the Group’s performance and impact on shareholder wealth, the Board has had regard to the following in 
respect of the current financial year and the previous four years. no dividends have been paid or declared during this period.

30 June  
2007

30 June  
2008

30 June  
2009

30 June  
2010

30 June  
2011

Share price as at 30 June each year

year on year change in the share price

$0.24

362%

$0.53

121%

$0.815

54%

$0.345

(58%)

$0.175

(49%)

Consolidated net profit / (loss) from continuing 
operations ($000)

Cumulative net profit / (loss) from continuing 
operations ($000)

($1,542)

$15,651

$28,736

$14,423

$2,159

($2,788)

$12,863

$41,599

$56,022

$58,181

Non-executive directors
total remuneration for all non-executive directors, last voted upon by shareholders at a General meeting in november 2008, 
is not to exceed $300,000 per annum. 

a  non-executive  director’s  base  fee  is  $62,500  per  annum  and  the  Chairman  receives  $105,000  per  annum.  these  fees 
were  last  increased  with  effect  from  1  January  2010.  non-executive  directors  do  not  receive  any  performance-related 
remuneration. directors’ fees cover all main Board activities and membership of Board committees. the Company does not 
have any terms or schemes relating to incentives or retirement benefits for non-executive directors.

Fixed compensation
Fixed compensation consists of base compensation as well as employer contributions to superannuation funds. 

Short term incentive scheme
Short term incentives are assessed by the remuneration Committee at 31 december each year based on two components:

1.	
2. 

the	performance	of	the	business	as	a	whole;	and	
the individual performances of each employee.  

the  value  of  any  short  term  incentive  is  restricted  to  a  maximum  50%  of  an  individual’s  Fixed  Compensation.    of  this 
amount,	half	is	applicable	to	fixed	Remuneration	Committee	approved	business	performance	targets;	primarily	relating	to	
production, reserves and cash flow measures.  the other half is assessed by, and is at the discretion of, the remuneration 
Committee based on an individual’s achievement of role related performance measures.

the remuneration Committee is not obliged to make incentive payments where there are material adverse changes in the 
circumstances of the Company. 

Short term incentives may be paid in cash or by the issue of shares in the Company.  

non-executive directors are not entitled to participate in the short term incentive scheme.

all short term incentives awarded during the period are included in remuneration, as set out on page 25, and fully vested to 
each of the directors, named Company executives, and key management personnel during the period.  

BaCK to ContentS

Carnarvon Petroleum limited 21

direCtorS’ rePort

remuneration report (auDiteD) (continueD)

Long term incentive scheme - Employee Share Plan
the Carnarvon employee Share Plan (“eSP”) was implemented following shareholder approval at the 1997 annual General 
meeting (“aGm”) and was last ratified by shareholders at the aGm on 27 november 2009. 

the purpose of the eSP is to attract, retain and motivate those who have been invited by the Board to participate in the 
eSP and align their interests with all other shareholders by encouraging performance that increases shareholder wealth 
through long term growth. 

the principal provisions of the Plan include:

•	

•	
•	

•	

•	

•	

•	

the	 Plan	 is	 available	 to	 all	 directors,	 employees	 or	 consultants	 of	 the	 Company	 or	 any	 of	 its	 subsidiaries	 (“Eligible	
Person”);
the	Company	may	at	any	time,	in	its	absolute	discretion,	make	an	offer	to	an	Eligible	Person;
the	number	of	Plan	Shares	issued	to	any	Eligible	Person	and	the	issue	price	is	to	be	determined	by	the	directors	of	the	
Company;
the	issue	price	is	to	be	no	less	than	the	weighted	average	market	price	of	the	Company’s	shares	on	the	5	trading	days	
prior	to	the	proposed	date	of	issue;
the	offer	may	be	accepted	by	an	Eligible	Person	or	an	associate	of	that	Eligible	Person,	within	the	given	acceptance	
period;
the	person	accepting	the	offer	(“Participant”)	will	be	taken	to	have	agreed	to	borrow	from	the	Company	on	the	terms	of	
the	loan	agreement	referred	to	below	an	amount	to	fund	the	purchase	of	the	Plan	Shares;
the	Plan	Shares	will	rank	pari	passu	with	all	issued	fully	paid	ordinary	shares	in	respect	of	voting	rights,	dividends	and	
entitlement	to	participate	in	any	bonus	or	rights	issues;

•	 Eligible	Persons	may	not	dispose	of	a	third	of	their	Plan	Shares	before	the	second	year	following	their	issue	and	may	not	
dispose of a third of their Plan Shares before the third year following their issue.  these restrictions do not apply in the 
event of redundancy or change of control.

•	 until	the	loan	to	the	Participant	is	fully	repaid,	the	Company	has	control	over	the	disposal	of	the	Plan	Shares.		Once	the	

•	

loan	is	repaid	in	full,	the	Participant	may	deal	with	the	Plan	Shares	as	he	wishes;
the	 aggregate	 number	 of	 Plan	 Shares	 and	 other	 shares	 and	 options	 issued	 in	 the	 previous	 5	 years	 under	 any	 other	
employee	incentive	scheme	of	the	Company	must	not	exceed	5%	of	the	issued	capital	of	the	Company;	and

•	 applications	will	be	made	as	soon	as	practicable	after	the	allotment	of	the	Plan	Shares	for	listing	for	quotation	on	ASX.

the principal provisions of the loan agreement include:

•	

•	

the	amount	lent	will	be	an	advance	equal	to	the	issue	price	of	the	Plan	Shares	multiplied	by	the	number	of	Plan	Shares	
issued;
the	loan	can	be	repaid	at	any	time	but	the	Participant	must	pay	any	amount	outstanding	to	the	Company	within	30	days	
of termination of the eligible Person’s employment.  all dividends declared and paid on the Plan Shares will be applied 
towards	the	repayment	of	the	advance	and	there	is	no	interest	on	the	advance;
the	maximum	liability	in	respect	of	the	loan	will	be	the	value	of	the	Plan	Shares	from	time	to	time;	and

•	
•	 a	holding	lock	will	be	placed	on	the	Plan	Shares	until	the	loan	is	fully	repaid.
•	

loans	made	under	the	ESP	involve	no	cash	outlay	by	the	Company.

a complete copy of the rules of the eSP (which incorporates the terms of the loan agreement) is available for inspection by 
shareholders (free of charge) at the Company’s registered office or, upon request, from the Company Secretary.

Plan Shares are approved by the remuneration Committee based upon the assessed performance of each person against 
his job specifications and the recommendations of the Chief executive officer, and in the case of directors, with the approval 
of shareholders. 

22

2011 annual rePort

BaCK to ContentS

direCtorS’ rePort

remuneration report (auDiteD) (continueD)

the remuneration Committee, having regard to recent changes in the taxation of certain long term incentive schemes and 
current trends in structuring long term incentive plans, is of the view that the Company’s eSP is effectively structured to meet 
its objectives in attracting, retaining and motivating appropriately qualified and experienced directors and senior executives. 

during the current financial year the following Plan Shares were issued to executive officers of the Company:

executive officers

aC Cook 

PP Huizenga

number of shares 
issued

   200,000

   200,000

issue  
date

10/12/2010

10/12/2010

issue price  
per share

$0.44

$0.44

Loan

$88,800

$88,800

the issue price for each issue above was calculated based on the 5 day weighted average closing price prior to the date of 
offer. the purchases were funded by interest-free loans with a limited recourse security over the Plan Shares and subject to 
the detailed rules of the eSP. the shares remain subject to the disposal restrictions contained in the Plan rules summarized 
above.

Directors’ and executive officers’ remuneration (Company and consolidated)
details of the nature and amount of each major element of the remuneration of each director of the Company and each of 
the named Company and Group executives receiving the highest remuneration are set out on the following page.

in order to determine the cost of Plan Shares issued in a period, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option Pricing model, 
calculated at the date of issue of the Plan Shares, assuming a 3 year life and nil cash consideration. For this purpose, Plan 
Shares are treated as having vested immediately and the cost calculated under the Black-Scholes option Pricing model is 
recognised as an expense entirely in the current period, notwithstanding restrictions on their disposal and the period over 
which the benefits arise. the following factors and assumptions were used in determining the fair value of Plan Shares at 
grant date in the current reporting period:

2011
grant date

assumed
expiry date

fair value per 
option

exercise  
price

price of 
shares at 
grant date

expected 
volatility

risk free 
interest rate

Dividend  
yield

10/12/2010

09/12/2013

$0.195

$0.4

$0.44

60%

4.75%

0%

Service contracts 
the contract duration, period of notice and termination conditions for key management personnel are as follows:

(i)  ted Jacobson, whilst employed as Chief executive officer and managing director, was engaged on a rolling 12 month 
employment agreement. termination by the Company is with 3 months’ notice (or payment in lieu thereof) and payment 
of 9 months’ remuneration. termination by mr Jacobson is with 3 months’ notice.  on 30 June 2011 mr Jacobson retired 
as Chief executive officer and managing director and agreed to provide consultancy services to the Company with effect 
from 1 July 2011.

(ii)  Philip Huizenga, Chief operating officer, is engaged as an employee. termination by the Company is with 3 months’ 
notice  (or  payment  in  lieu  thereof)  and  payment  of  6  months’  remuneration.  termination  by  mr  Huizenga  is  with  3 
months’ notice.

(iii) adrian Cook, was engaged as General manager (Corporate) during the period and is engaged as an employee. termination 
by the Company is with 3 months’ notice (or payment in lieu thereof) and payment of 6 months’ remuneration. termination 
by mr Cook is with 3 months’ notice.  mr Cook will act as the Company’s Chief executive officer and managing director 
with effect from 1 July 2011.

BaCK to ContentS

Carnarvon Petroleum limited 23

direCtorS’ rePort

remuneration report (auDiteD) (continueD)

Equity instruments 
(i)  Shares

there were no shares in the Company issued as compensation to key management personnel during the reporting period, 
other than the eSP shares treated in principle as an option over the Company’s shares as described under (ii) below.

(ii)  options

there  were  no  options  over  shares  in  the  Company  issued  as  compensation  to  key  management  personnel  during  the 
reporting period. no options have been issued since the end of the financial year. eSP shares issued as compensation to key 
management personnel during the year are disclosed on page 22. 

there were no shares issued in either 2011 or 2010 on the exercise of options. 

there are no amounts unpaid on shares issued as a result of the exercise of options. during the reporting period there was 
no forfeiture, lapsing or vesting of options issued in previous periods. 

at the end of the reporting period, other than Plan Shares (treated in principle as options), there were no unvested options 
on issue. 

24

2011 annual rePort

BaCK to ContentS

direCtorS’ rePort

2
0
1
0

2
0
1
1

2
0
1
0

2
0
1
1

m
r

W
F
o
s
t
e
r

m
r
n
C
F
e
a
r
i
s

n
a
m
e

D
i
r
e
c
t
o
r
s

N
o
n
-
E
x
e
c
u
t
i
v
e

m
r
P
J
l
e
o
n
h
a
r
d
t

(

C
h
a
i
r

m
a
n
)

remuneration report (auDiteD) (continueD)

2
0
1
0

E
x
e
c
u
t
i
v
e

m
r
K
P
J
u
d
g
e

2
0
1
1
(
r
e
t
i
r
e
d
1
5
J
u
l
y
2
0
1
0
)

2
0
1
1
(
f
r
o
m
1
7
a
u
g
u
s
t
2
0
1
1
)

2
0
1
0

e
x
e
c
u
t
i
v
e
s

2
0
1
1
(
t
o
3
0
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
1
)

2
0
1
0

2
0
1
1

2
0
1
0
(
f
r
o
m
2
n
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
0
9
)

m
r
r
a
a
n
d
e
r
s
o
n
(

C
F
o
/
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
S
e
c
r
e
t
a
r
y
)

2
0
1
1

m
r
a
C
C
o
o
k
(

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

m
a
n
a
g
e
r
–
C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
)

m
r
P
P
H
u
i
z
e
n
g
a
(

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

m
a
n
a
g
e
r
–
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
)

m
r
e
P
J
a
c
o
b
s
o
n
(

i

C
h
e
f
e
x
e
c
u
t
i
v
e
o

f
f
i
c
e
r
)

$
2
2
3
,
0
6
5

$
3
7
5
,
7
3
0

$
3
2
5
,
9
8
8

$
3
7
5
,
7
3
0

$
9
5
,
4
1
2

-

$
6
5
,
8
0
1

$
9
5
,
4
1
2

$
2
0
,
0
7
6

$
2
5
,
0
0
0

$
2
9
,
3
3
8

$
2
5
,
0
0
0

$
3
3
8
,
7
4
7

$
3
9
,
0
6
3

$
4
8
,
4
2
4

$
3
9
,
0
6
3

$
4
2
4
,
6
5
6

$
5
1
6
,
0
5
0

$
8
0
,
5
0
0

$
5
2
,
3
2
5

$
3
8
,
2
1
9

$
4
6
,
4
4
4

$
6
1
,
2
5
0

-

$
5
4
,
4
5
7

$
6
1
,
2
5
0

$
6
2
,
5
0
0

$
1
0
4
,
2
5
0

$
1
0
5
,
0
0
0

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

$
5
8
1
,
8
8
8

$
5
3
5
,
2
0
5

$
4
6
9
,
5
5
1

$
5
3
5
,
2
0
5

$
5
4
3
,
3
7
5

$
6
1
4
,
8
1
9

$
6
1
,
2
5
0

-

$
5
4
,
4
5
7

$
6
1
,
2
5
0

$
6
2
,
5
0
0

$
1
0
4
,
2
5
0

$
1
0
5
,
0
0
0

1
7
.
8
%

-

1
4
.
0
%

1
7
.
8
%

1
4
.
8
%

7
.
6
%

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

5
8
.
2
%

7
.
3
%

7
.
3
%

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

s
h
o
r
t
t
e
r
m

e
m
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t

p
a
y
m
e
n
t
s

p
o
s
t

s
h
a
r
e
-
b
a
s
e
d

(
$
)

a
n
d
f
e
e
s

s
a
l
a
r
y

(
$
)

(
$
)

c
a
s
h
b
o
n
u
s

s
h
o
r
t

t
e
r
m

c
o
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
s

s
u
p
e
r
a
n
n
u
a
t
i
o
n

(
$
)

s
h
a
r
e
s

(
$
)

t
o
t
a
l

p
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e

r
e
m
u
n
e
r
a
t
i
o
n

p
r
o
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
o
f

a
%
o
f

s
h
a
r
e
s
a
s

V
a
l
u
e
o
f

r
e
l
a
t
e
d
%

r
e
m
u
n
e
r
a
t
i
o
n

(

C
o
m
p
a
n
y
a
n
d
c
o
n
s
o
l
i
d
a
t
e
d
)

t
o
t
a
l
c
o
m
p
e
n
s
a
t
i
o
n
:
k
e
y

m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
p
e
r
s
o
n
n
e
l

d
i
r
e
c
t
o
r
s
’

i

f
e
e
s
a
r
e
p
a
d
o
r
p
a
y
a
b
l
e
t
o
t
h
e
d
i
r
e
c
t
o
r
o
r
a
d
i
r
e
c
t
o
r
-
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
e
n
t
i
t
y
.

2
0
1
0

2
0
1
1

$
1
,
4
2
7
,
3
3
4

$
1
,
4
8
9
,
4
6
7

$
1
7
1
,
0
5
1

$
2
4
3
,
1
4
9

$
8
7
,
6
3
3

$
9
6
,
4
4
4

$
3
8
7
,
1
7
1

$
2
,
0
7
3
,
1
8
9

$
7
8
,
1
2
6

$
1
,
9
0
7
,
1
8
6

2
0
1
0
(

C
F
o
u
n
t
i
l
3
1
m
a
y
2
0
1
0
)

$
2
2
6
,
8
7
5

$
2
4
,
7
5
0

-

-

$
2
5
1
,
6
2
5

9
.
8
%

-

BaCK to ContentS

Carnarvon Petroleum limited 25

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
direCtorS’ rePort

NON-audiT SErviCES
the auditors have not performed any non-audit services over and above their statutory duties during the current reporting 
period. 

details of the amounts paid or payable to the auditor of the Group for audit services provided during the year are set out 
below:

audit services

Auditors of the Company:

consolidated 2011 ($)

audit and review of financial reports

122,000

dirECTOrS’ iNTErESTS
at the date of this report, the relevant interests of the directors in securities of the Company are as follows: 

name

PJ leonhardt

aC Cook

eP Jacobson

nC Fearis

Wa Foster

ordinary shares

options over ordinary shares

17,000,000

1,794,839

31,037,335

8,600,000

-

-

-

-

-

-

Shares issued under the Company’s eSP are included under the heading ordinary Shares.

SharE OPTiONS
Options issued to directors and executives of the Company
there were no options over shares issued as compensation to directors or named executives during or since the end of the 
financial year. 

LikELy dEvELOPmENTS 
the likely developments for the 2011 financial year are contained in the operating and financial review as set out on pages 
4 to 16.the directors are of the opinion that further information as to the likely developments in the operations of the Group 
would prejudice the interests of the Company and the Group and it has accordingly not been included.

ENvirONmENTaL rEguLaTiON aNd PErFOrmaNCE
the  Group’s  oil  and  gas  exploration  and  development  activities  are  concentrated  in  thailand,  and  Western  australia.  
environmental obligations are regulated under both State and Federal law in Western australia and under the department 
of  mineral  Fuels  regulations  in  thailand.    no  significant  environmental  breaches  have  been  notified  by  any  government 
agency during the year ended 30 June 2011.

dividENdS
no dividends were paid during the year and the directors do not recommend payment of a dividend in respect of the current 
financial year.

audiTOr’S iNdEPENdENCE dECLaraTiON
the auditor’s independence declaration under Section 307C of the Corporations act is set out on page 28 and forms part of 
the directors’ report for the financial year ended 30 June 2011.

PriNCiPaL aCTiviTiES
during the course of the 2011 financial year the Group’s principal activities continued to be directed towards oil and gas 
exploration, development and production.

26

2011 annual rePort

BaCK to ContentS

direCtorS’ rePort

idENTiFiCaTiON OF iNdEPENdENT dirECTOrS
the independent directors are identified in the Corporate Governance Statement section of this annual report as set out on 
pages 73 to 74.

SigNiFiCaNT ChaNgES iN STaTE OF aFFairS
in the opinion of the directors no significant changes in the state of affairs of the Group occurred during the current financial 
year other than as outlined in the operating and financial review as set out on pages 4 to 16.

indemnification and insurance of directors and officers

during  the  period  the  Company  paid  a  premium  to  insure  the  directors  and  officers  of  the  Company  and  its  controlled 
entities. the policy prohibits the disclosure of the nature of the liabilities covered and the amount of the premium paid. 

PrOCEEdiNgS ON bEhaLF OF ThE COmPaNy
no person has applied for leave of Court to bring proceedings on behalf of the Company or intervene in any proceedings 
to which the Company is a party for the purpose of taking responsibility on behalf of the Company for all or any part of the 
proceedings. the Company was not a party to any such proceedings during the year.

OPEraTiNg aNd FiNaNCiaL rEviEw
an operating and financial review of the Group for the financial year ended 30 June 2011 is set out on pages 4 to 16 and forms 
part of this report.

iNdEmNiTy OF dirECTOrS aNd COmPaNy SECrETary
deeds of access and indemnity have been executed by the Company with each of the directors and Company Secretary. the 
deeds require the Company to indemnify each director and Company Secretary against any legal proceedings, to the extent 
permitted by law, made against, suffered, paid or incurred by the directors or Company Secretary pursuant to, or arising 
from or in any way connected with the director or Company Secretary being an officer of the Company.

EvENTS SubSEquENT TO rEPOrTiNg daTE 
no matters or circumstance has arisen since 30 June 2011 that in the opinion of the directors has significantly affected, or 
may significantly affect in future financial years:

(i)	 The	Group’s	operations;	or
(ii)	 The	results	of	those	operations;	or
(iii) the Group’s state of affairs

rOuNdiNg OFF
the  Company  is  an  entity  to  which  aSiC  Class  order  98/100  dated  10  July  1998  applies.  in  accordance  with  that  Class 
order amounts in the financial report and directors’ report have been rounded off to the nearest thousand dollars, unless 
otherwise stated.

Signed in accordance with a resolution of the directors.

pJ Leonhardt
director   
Perth, 31 august 2011

BaCK to ContentS

Carnarvon Petroleum limited 27

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
auditor’S indePendenCe deClaration

28

2011 annual rePort

BaCK to ContentS

ConSolidated inCome Statement
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

consolidated

2011
$000

2010
$000

54,750

65,230

93

82

(18,891)

(21,473)

(1,724)

(222)

(1,686)

(228)

(4,463)

(983)

(11,247)

(207)

-

(1,396)

(227)

(1,497)

(392)

(525)

(1,124)

(384)

(753)

(1)

15,192

37,540

5,137

5,496

10,633

2,400

13,033

2,159

2,159

0.3

0.3

10,616

8,790

19,406

3,711

23,117

14,423

14,423

2.1

2.1

notes

4

5

oil sales

other income

Cost of sales

administrative expenses

directors’ fees

employee benefits expense

travel related costs

unrealised foreign exchange (loss) / gain 

new venture costs

exploration expenditure written off

14

Share-based payments

Finance costs

profit before income tax

taxes

Current income tax expense 

deferred income tax expense

9 (a)

9 (b)

Special remuneratory benefit

total taxes

profit for the year

profit attributable to members of the 
company

Basic earnings per share (cents per share)

diluted earnings per share (cents per share)

8

8

The above consolidated income statements should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes to the financial statements.

BaCK to ContentS

Carnarvon Petroleum limited 29

ConSolidated Statement oF ComPreHenSive inCome
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

profit for the year

other comprehensive income

consolidated

2011
$000

2010
$000

2,159

14,423

exchange differences arising in translation  
of foreign operations

(17,439)

(1,482)

total comprehensive (loss) / income for the year

(15,280)

12,941

total comprehensive (loss) / income attributable to 
members of the company

(15,280)

12,941

The above consolidated statement of comprehensive income should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes to the 
financial statements.

30

2011 annual rePort

BaCK to ContentS

ConSolidated Statement oF FinanCial PoSition
AS AT 30 JuNE 2011

notes

21(b)

10

12

13

11

14

15

17

24

18

19

current assets

Cash and cash equivalents

trade and other receivables

inventories

other assets

total current assets

non-current assets

Property, plant and equipment

exploration and evaluation expenditure

oil and gas assets

total non-current assets

total assets 

current liabilities

trade and other payables

employee benefits

Current tax

Provisions

total current liabilities

non-current liabilities

deferred tax

total non-current liabilities

total liabilities

net assets

equity

issued capital 

reserves

retained earnings

total equity

consolidated

2011
$000

14,798

5,444

3,381

287

23,910

470

5,955

71,682

78,107

2010
$000

30,255

7,780

4,090

440

42,565

635

6,351

70,176

77,162

102,017

119,727

4,895

146

875

-

5,621

91

6,165

2,172

5,916

14,049

28,802

28,802

34,718

67,299

68,240

(20,222)

19,281

23,306

23,306

37,355

82,372

68,240

(2,990)

17,122

67,299

82,372

The above consolidated statement of financial position should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes to the financial 
statements.

BaCK to ContentS

Carnarvon Petroleum limited 31

ConSolidated Statement oF CHanGeS in eQuity
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

issued
capital
$000

68,090

104

46

-

retained
earnings
$000

translation
reserve
$000

share-based
payments
reserve
$000

total
$000

2,699

(3,346)

1,131

68,574

-

-

-

-

14,423

(1,482)

-

707

-

104

753

12,941

Balance at 1 July 2009

Shares issued net of  
transaction costs

Share based payments

total comprehensive income

Balance at 30 June 2010

68,240

17,122

(4,828)

1,838

82,372

Share based payments

total comprehensive income

-

-

-

2,159

-

(17,439)

207

-

207

(15,280)

Balance at 30 June 2011

68,240

19,281

(22,267)

2,045

67,299

The above statements of changes in equity should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes to the financial statements.

32

2011 annual rePort

BaCK to ContentS

 Statement oF CaSH FloWS
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

notes

cash flows from operating activities

receipts from customers and GSt recovered

Payments to suppliers and employees

income tax and special remuneratory benefit paid

interest received 

net cash flows generated from operating activities

21(a)

cash flows from investing activities

exploration and development expenditure

Cash held as security

acquisition of property, plant and equipment

net cash flows (used in) investing activities

cash flows from financing activities

Payment of share issue costs

Proceeds from repayment of employee Share Plan loans

net cash flows from financing activities

net (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the  
financial year
effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash and cash 
equivalents

cash and cash equivalents at the end of the financial year

21(b)

consolidated

2011

$000

2010

$000

61,715

(24,323)

(14,055)

134

23,471

71,274

(23,775)

(15,277)

82

32,304

(34,462)

(34,488)

-

(207)

2,153

(533)

(34,669)

(32,868)

-

-

-

(11,198)

30,255

(4,259)

14,798

(7)

111

104

(460)

31,099

(384)

30,255

The  above  consolidated  statement  of  cash  flows  should  be  read  in  conjunction  with  the  accompanying  notes  to  the  financial 
statements.

BaCK to ContentS

Carnarvon Petroleum limited 33

 
 
noteS to tHe FinanCial StatementS
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

1. 

reporting entity 

the consolidated financial report of Carnarvon Petroleum limited (‘Company’) for the financial year ended 30 June 
2011 comprises the Company and its controlled entities (the “Group”) and the Group’s interest in jointly controlled 
assets. 

the separate financial statements of the parent entity, Carnarvon Petroleum limited, have not been presented within 
this financial report as permitted by the Corporations Act 2001.

the financial report was authorised for issue by the directors on 31 august 2011. 

2. 

Basis of preparation of the financiaL report

Statement of compliance
the  financial  report  is  a  general  purpose  financial  report  prepared  in  accordance  with  australian  accounting 
Standards  (“aaSBs”),  including  australian  accounting  interpretations,  other  authoritative  pronouncements  of  the 
australian accounting Standards Board (“aaSB”), and the Corporations act 2001. 

australian accounting Standards set out accounting policies that the aaSB has concluded would result in a financial 
report containing relevant and reliable information about transactions, events and conditions to which they apply. 
Compliance with australian accounting Standards ensures that the financial statements and notes also comply with 
international Financial reporting Standards (“iFrSs”). material accounting policies adopted in the preparation of this 
financial report are presented below. they have been consistently applied unless otherwise stated.

the following new standards and amendments to standards are mandatory for the first time for the financial year 
beginning 1 July 2010:

•	 aaSB  2009-5  Further  Amendments  to  Australian  Accounting  Standards  arising  from  the  Annual  Improvements 

Project;

•	 aaSB  2009-8  Amendments  to  Australian  Accounting  Standards  –  Group  cash-settled  Share-based  Payment 

Transactions;

•	 aaSB 2009-10 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards – Classification of Rights Issues;
•	 aaSB interpretation 19 Extinguishing Financial Liabilities with Equity Instruments;
•	 aaSB 2009-13 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from Interpretation 19;	and
•	 aaSB 2010-3 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from the Annual Improvements Project.

the adoption of these standards did not have any impact on the amounts for the current period or prior periods.

Basis of measurement
the financial report is prepared on a historical cost basis, except for available-for-sale financial which are measured 
at fair value.  

34

2011 annual rePort

BaCK to ContentS

noteS to tHe FinanCial StatementS
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

2. 

Basis of preparation of the financiaL report (continueD)

use of estimates and judgements
the preparation of the financial report requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that 
affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses. 
actual results may differ from these estimates.

estimates  and  underlying  assumptions  are  reviewed  on  an  ongoing  basis.  revisions  to  accounting  estimates  are 
recognized in the period in which the estimate is revised and in any future periods affected.

Key estimate – impairment
the Group assesses impairment at each reporting date by evaluating conditions specific to the group that may lead 
to the impairment of assets. Where an impairment trigger exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is determined. 
value-in-use calculations performed in assessing recoverable amounts incorporate a number of key estimates. 

there was not considered to be any impairment trigger over the carrying value of the Group’s interest in exploration 
and evaluation or oil and gas assets at the date of this report.

Key estimate – income and capital gains taxes
estimates are made in determining any provision for income and capital gains taxes. the Group recognizes liabilities 
of anticipated tax based on estimates of taxes due. Where the final tax outcome of these matters is different from 
the amounts that were initially recognised, such differences will impact the income tax and deferred tax expenses, 
assets or provisions in the year in which such determination is made.

Key estimate – special remuneratory benefit and income tax
the Group’s Phetchabun Basin Joint venture is subject to thai income tax at 50% and a special remuneratory benefit 
(“SrB”) tax on profits, at sliding scale rates (0% - 75% per concession). 

the SrB, which is tax deductible in the calculation of thai income taxes, involves a highly detailed calculation done 
on a concession by concession basis. the basis of the calculation is petroleum profits, adjusted for capital spent, 
being subjected to a sliding scale SrB rate such that profits are not taxed until all capital has been recovered. the 
sliding scale rate is principally driven by production and pricing but is subject to other adjustments such as changes 
in  thailand’s  consumer  price  index,  wholesale  price  index,  cumulative  metres  drilled  on  the  concession,  and,  for 
certain concessions, changes in the exchange rate between the thai Baht and the uSd.

the SrB calculation is performed and paid annually for each concession at the calculated annual rate at the end 
of each calendar year. Judgement is required in determining provisions which are based on estimates of amounts 
due. Where the final outcome of those matters is different from the amounts that were originally recognised, such 
difference may impact those provisions in the period in which such a determination is made.

Key judgement – functional currency
the determination of the functional currency of the Company’s controlled entities requires consideration of a number 
of  factors.  these  factors  include  the  currencies  that  primarily  influence  their  sales  and  costs  and  the  economic 
environment in which the entities operate.

Key judgements – other
other areas of judgement are in the determination of oil reserves, rehabilitation provisions, capitalisation of exploration 
and evaluation costs, determination of areas of interest, and the units of production method of depreciation.

BaCK to ContentS

Carnarvon Petroleum limited 35

noteS to tHe FinanCial StatementS
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

3. 

significant accounting poLicies

the accounting policies set out below have been applied consistently to all periods presented in the consolidated 
financial  report.  the  accounting  policies  have  been  applied  consistently  by  all  entities  in  the  Group.  Certain 
comparative amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation.

(a) baSiS OF CONSOLidaTiON

Controlled entities
the  consolidated  financial  report  comprises  the  financial  statements  of  the  Company  and  its  controlled  entities. 
a  controlled  entity  is  any  entity  controlled  by  the  Company  whereby  the  Company  has  the  power  to  control  the 
financial and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain benefits from its activities. all inter-company balances 
and  transactions  between  entities  in  the  economic  entity,  including  any  unrealised  profits  or  losses,  have  been 
eliminated on consolidation. accounting policies of controlled entities have been changed where necessary to ensure 
consistency with those applied by the Company.

Where controlled entities enter or leave the economic entity during the year, their operating results are included or 
excluded from the date control was obtained or until the date control ceased. investments in controlled entities are 
carried at cost in the Company’s financial statements.

Jointly Ventures
the  Group’s  shares  of  the  assets,  liabilities,  revenue  and  expenses  of  jointly  ventures  have  been  included  in  the 
appropriate line items of the consolidated financial statements. details of the Group’s interests are provided in note 16.

(b) iNCOmE Tax aNd SPECiaL rEmuNEraTOry bENEFiT

Income tax (current tax & deferred tax)
the charge for current income tax expense is based on the result for the year adjusted for any non-assessable or 
disallowed items. it is calculated using tax rates that have been enacted or are substantively enacted by balance 
sheet date.

deferred tax is accounted for using the balance sheet liability method in respect of temporary differences arising 
between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the financial statements. no deferred 
income tax will be recognised from the initial recognition of an asset or liability, excluding a business combination, 
where there is no effect on accounting or taxable profit or loss.

deferred tax is calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the period when the asset is realised or liability 
is settled.  deferred tax is recognised in the income statement except where it relates to items recognised directly in 
equity, in which case it is recognised in equity. deferred income tax assets are recognised for deductible temporary 
differences and unused tax losses only if it is probable that future taxable amounts will be available to utilise those 
temporary differences and tax losses. deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when they relate to income taxes 
levied by the same taxation authority and the company / group intends to settle its current tax assets and liabilities 
on a net basis.

the  amount  of  benefits  brought  to  account  or  which  may  be  realised  in  the  future  is  based  on  the  assumption 
that no adverse change will occur in income taxation legislation and the anticipation that the economic entity will 
derive  sufficient  future  assessable  income  to  enable  the  benefit  to  be  realised  and  comply  with  the  conditions  of 
deductibility imposed by the law. the carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each balance date and 
only recognised to the extent that sufficient future assessable income is expected to be obtained against which the 
benefits of the deferred tax assets can be utilized.

36

2011 annual rePort

BaCK to ContentS

noteS to tHe FinanCial StatementS
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

3. 

significant accounting poLicies (continueD)

Special remuneratory benefit  
the Group’s Phetchabun Basin Joint venture is subject to a special remuneratory benefit (“SrB”) tax on profits, at 
sliding scale rates (0% - 75% per concession). 

the SrB, which is tax deductible in the calculation of thai income taxes, involves a detailed calculation done on a 
concession by concession basis. the basis of the calculation is petroleum profits, adjusted for capital spent, being 
subjected to a sliding scale SrB rate such that profits are not taxed until all capital has been recovered. the sliding 
scale  rate  is  principally  driven  by  production  and  pricing  but  is  subject  to  other  adjustments  such  as  changes  in 
thailand’s consumer price index, wholesale price index, cumulative metres drilled on the concession, and, for certain 
concessions, changes in the exchange rate between the thai Baht and the uSd. the SrB calculation is performed 
quarterly for each concession at the calculated annual rate at the end of each quarter.

the SrB is considered, for accounting purposes, to be a tax on income.

Tax consolidation
Carnarvon Petroleum limited and its wholly-owned australian-resident controlled entities formed a tax-consolidated 
group with effect from 1 July 2003 and are therefore taxed as a single entity from that date. Carnarvon Petroleum 
limited is the head entity of the tax-consolidated group. in future periods the members of the group will, if required, 
enter into a tax sharing agreement whereby each company in the group contributes to the income tax payable in 
proportion to their contribution to the net profit before tax of the tax consolidated group.

(C) PrOPErTy, PLaNT aNd EquiPmENT

Recognition and measurement
all property, plant and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. the cost 
of an item also includes the initial estimate of the costs of dismantling and removing an item and restoring the site 
on which it is located. Such amounts are determined based on current costs.

Subsequent costs are included in the asset’s carrying amount or recognised as a separate asset, as appropriate, only 
when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the group and the cost of the 
item can be measured reliably.  all other repairs and maintenance are charged to the income statement during the 
financial period in which they are incurred.

Impairment
the carrying amount of property, plant and equipment is reviewed at each balance date to determine whether there 
are any objective indicators of impairment that may indicate the carrying values may not be recoverable in whole or 
in part. impairment testing is carried out in accordance with note 3(f).

Where an asset does not generate cash flows that are largely independent it is assigned to a cash generating unit and 
the recoverable amount test applied to the cash generating unit as a whole. 

if the carrying value of the asset is determined to be in excess of its recoverable amount, the asset or cash generating 
unit is written down to its recoverable amount.

Depreciation
depreciation on property plant and equipment is calculated on a straight-line basis over expected useful life to the 
economic entity commencing from the time the asset is held ready for use. the major depreciation rates used for all 
classes of depreciable assets are:

Property, plant and equipment: 

10% to 33%

BaCK to ContentS

Carnarvon Petroleum limited 37

noteS to tHe FinanCial StatementS
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

3. 

significant accounting poLicies (continueD)

the assets’ residual values and useful lives are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at least annually.

an asset’s carrying amount is written down immediately to its recoverable amount if the asset’s carrying amount is 
greater than its estimated recoverable amount.

Gains and losses on disposals are determined by comparing proceeds with the carrying amount.  these gains and 
losses are included in the income statement.

(d) OiL aNd gaS aSSETS
oil and gas assets include costs transferred from exploration and evaluation once technical feasibility and commercial 
viability of an area of interest are demonstrable, together with subsequent costs to develop the asset to the production 
phase. 

Where the directors decide that specific costs will not be recovered from future development, those costs are charged 
to the income statement during the financial period in which the decision is made.

amortisation of oil and gas assets is calculated on a unit of production basis so as to write off costs, including an 
element of future costs, in proportion to the depletion of the estimated recoverable reserves which are expected to 
be recovered by the expiry of the production licenses.

(E) ExPLOraTiON aNd EvaLuaTiON
exploration and evaluation expenditure incurred is accumulated in respect of each identifiable area of interest. these 
costs are only carried forward to the extent that the Group’s rights of tenure to the area are current and that the costs 
are expected to be recouped through the successful development of the area, or where activities in the area have 
not yet reached a stage that permits reasonable assessment of the existence of economically recoverable reserves.

each area of interest is assessed for impairment to determine the appropriateness of continuing to carry forward 
costs in relation to that area of interest. impairment testing is carried out in accordance with note 3(f).

accumulated  costs  in  relation  to  an  abandoned  area  are  written  off  in  full  against  profit  in  the  year  in  which  the 
decision to abandon the area is made.

once the technical feasibility and commercial viability of the extraction of mineral resources in an area of interest are 
demonstrable, exploration and evaluation costs attributable to that area of interest are first tested for impairment 
and then reclassified from exploration and evaluation to oil and gas assets.  

(F) rECOvErabLE amOuNT OF aSSETS aNd imPairmENT TESTiNg
assets that have an indefinite useful life are not subject to depreciation and are tested annually for impairment by 
estimating their recoverable amount.

assets  that  are  subject  to  depreciation  are  reviewed  annually  to  determine  whether  there  is  any  indication  of 
impairment. Where such an indicator exists, a formal assessment of recoverable amount is then made. Where this 
is less than carrying amount, the asset is written down to its recoverable amount.

recoverable amount is the greater of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. value in use is the present value 
of the future cash flows expected to be derived from the asset or cash generating unit. in estimating value in use, a 
pre-tax discount rate is used which reflects the current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks 
specific to the asset. any resulting impairment loss is recognised immediately in the income statement.

For the purposes of impairment testing assets are grouped together into the smallest group of assets that generates 
cash inflows from continuing use that are largely independent of the cash inflows of other assets or groups of assets.

38

2011 annual rePort

BaCK to ContentS

noteS to tHe FinanCial StatementS
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

3. 

significant accounting poLicies (continueD)

(g) PrOviSiONS
Provisions are recognised when the Group has a legal or constructive obligation, as a result of past events, for which 
it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will result and that outflow can be reliably measured. Provisions 
are determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market 
assessments of the time value of money and, where appropriate, the risks specific to the liability. 

Restoration costs
any provision for future restoration and rehabilitation costs is capitalised and depreciated in accordance with the 
policy set out in note 3(c). the unwinding of the effect of discounting on the provision is recognised as a finance cost.

(h) FiNaNCiaL iNSTrumENTS
recognition and initial measurement
Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognised when the entity becomes a party to the contractual provisions 
to the instrument. For financial assets, this is equivalent to the date that the company commits itself to either the 
purchase or sale of the asset (i.e. trade date accounting is adopted).

Financial  instruments  are  initially  measured  at  fair  value  plus  transaction  costs,  except  where  the  instrument 
is  classified  “at  fair  value  through  profit  or  loss”,  in  which  case  transaction  costs  are  expensed  to  profit  or  loss 
immediately.

Classification and subsequent measurement
Finance  instruments  are  subsequently  measured  at  fair  value,  amortised  cost  using  the  effective  interest  rate 
method, or cost.

amortised  cost  is  the  amount  at  which  the  financial  asset  or  financial  liability  is  measured  at  initial  recognition 
less principal repayments and any reduction for impairment, and adjusted for any cumulative amortisation of the 
difference between that initial amount and the maturity amount calculated using the effective interest method.

Fair value is determined based on current bid prices for all quoted investments. valuation techniques are applied to 
determine the fair value for all unlisted securities, including recent arm’s length transactions, reference to similar 
instruments and option pricing models.

the effective interest method is used to allocate interest income or interest expense over the relevant period and 
is  equivalent  to  the  rate  that  discounts  estimated  future  cash  payments  or  receipts  (including  fees,  transaction 
costs and other premiums or discounts) through the expected life (or when this cannot be reliably predicted, the 
contractual term) of the financial instrument to the net carrying amount of the financial asset or financial liability. 
revisions to expected future net cash flows will necessitate an adjustment to the carrying value with a consequential 
recognition of an income or expense item in profit or loss.

the Group does not designate any interests in subsidiaries, associates or joint venture entities as being subject to the 
requirements of accounting Standards specifically applicable to financial instruments.

BaCK to ContentS

Carnarvon Petroleum limited 39

noteS to tHe FinanCial StatementS
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

3. 

significant accounting poLicies (continueD)

(i) Loans and receivables

loans  and  receivables  are  non-derivative  financial  assets  with  fixed  or  determinable  payments  that  are  not 
quoted in an active market and are subsequently measured at amortised cost. 

loans and receivables are included in current assets, where they are expected to mature within 12 months after 
the end of the reporting period.

(ii) Available-for-sale financial assets

available-for-sale financial assets are non-derivative financial assets that are either not suitable to be classified 
into other categories of financial assets due to their nature, or they are designated as such by management. 
they comprise investments in the equity of other entities where there is neither a fixed maturity nor fixed or 
determinable payments. 

they are subsequently measured at fair value with changes in such fair value (ie gains or losses) recognised in 
other comprehensive income (except for impairment losses and foreign exchange gains and losses). When the 
financial  asset  is  derecognised,  the  cumulative  gain  or  loss  pertaining  to  that  asset  previously  recognised  in 
other comprehensive income is reclassified into profit or loss available-for-sale financial assets are included in 
non-current assets where they are expected to be sold within 12 months after the end of the reporting period. all 
other financial assets are classified as current assets.

(iii) Financial liabilities

Non-derivative financial liabilities (excluding financial guarantees) are subsequently measured at amortised cost.

(i) SEgmENT rEPOrTiNg
the Group reports one segment, oil and gas exploration, development and production, to the chief operating decision 
maker, being the board of Carnarvon Petroleum limited, in assessing performance and determining the allocation 
of resources. the financial information presented in the statement of cashflows is the same basis as that presented 
to chief operating decision maker.

unless otherwise stated, all amounts reported to the chief operating decision maker are determined in accordance 
with accounting policies that are consistent to those adopted in the annual financial statements of the Group.

(J) FOrEigN CurrENCy 
Functional and presentation currency
the  functional  currency  of  each  of  the  group’s  entities  is  measured  using  the  currency  of  the  primary  economic 
environment  in  which  that  entity  operates  (the  “functional”  currency).  the  consolidated  financial  statements  are 
presented in australian dollars which is the Company’s functional and presentation currency. 

Transactions and balances
Foreign currency transactions are translated into functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the date 
of the transaction. Foreign currency monetary assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate at balance 
sheet date. non-monetary items measured at historical cost continue to be carried at the exchange rate at the date 
of the transaction.  

exchange differences arising on the translation of monetary items are recognised in the income statement, except 
where deferred in equity as a qualifying cash flow or net investment hedge. 

translation differences arising on non-monetary items, such as equities held at fair value through profit and loss, 
are reported as part of the fair value gain or loss. translation differences on non-monetary items, such as equities 
classified as available-for-sale financial assets, are included in the fair value reserve in equity.

40

2011 annual rePort

BaCK to ContentS

noteS to tHe FinanCial StatementS
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

3. 

significant accounting poLicies (continueD)

Foreign operations
the financial performance and position of foreign operations whose functional currency is different from the Group’s 
presentation currency are translated as follows:

•	assets	and	liabilities	are	translated	at	exchange	rates	prevailing	at	balance	sheet	date
•	income	and	expenses	are	translated	at	average	exchange	rates	for	the	period	

exchange  differences  arising  on  translation  of  foreign  operations  are  transferred  directly  to  the  group’s  foreign 
currency translation reserve as a separate component of equity.  these differences are recognised in the income 
statement upon disposal of the foreign operation.

(k) LEaSES
leases are classified at their inception as either operating or finance leases based on the economic substance of the 
agreement so as to reflect the risks and benefits incidental to ownership.

Operating leases
a lease where a significant portion of the risks and rewards of ownership are retained by the lessor are classified as 
operating leases. Payments in relation to operating leases are charged to the income statement on a straight-line 
basis over the period of the lease. 

(L) SharE CaPiTaL
incremental  costs  directly  attributable  to  an  equity  transaction  are  shown  as  a  deduction  from  equity,  net  of  any 
recognised income tax benefit.

(m) iNvENTOriES
inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realisable value. net realisable value is the estimated selling price 
in the ordinary course of business less any estimated selling costs.

Cost includes those costs incurred in bringing each component of inventory to its present location and condition. 

(N) EmPLOyEE bENEFiTS
Wages and salaries, annual leave
Provision  is  made  for  the  Group’s  liability  for  employee  benefits  arising  from  services  rendered  by  employees  to 
balance date. employee benefits that are expected to be settled within one year have been measured at the amounts 
expected to be paid when the liability is settled, plus related on-costs. 

Share based payments – Employee Share Plan
Share based compensation has been provided to eligible persons via the Carnarvon employee Share Plan (“eSP”), 
financed by means of interest-free limited recourse loans. under aaSB 2 “Share-based Payments”, the eSP shares 
are deemed to be equity settled, share-based remuneration.

For limited recourse loans issued to eligible persons on or after 1 January 2005, the Group is required to recognise 
within the income statement a remuneration expense measured at the fair value of the shares inherent in the issue 
to the eligible person, with a corresponding increase to a share-based payments reserve in equity. the fair value 
is measured at grant date and recognised when the eligible person become unconditionally entitled to the shares, 
effectively on grant. a loan receivable is not recognised.

the fair value at grant date is determined using a pricing model that factors in the share price at grant date, the 
expected price volatility of the underlying share, the expected dividend yield, and the risk free rate for the assumed 
term of the plan. upon repayment of the eSP loans, the balance of the share-based payments reserve relating to the 
loan repaid is transferred to issued capital.

BaCK to ContentS

Carnarvon Petroleum limited 41

noteS to tHe FinanCial StatementS
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

3. 

significant accounting poLicies (continueD)

(O) EarNiNgS PEr SharE
the Group presents basic and diluted earnings per share (“ePS”) for its ordinary shares.

Basic ePS is calculated by dividing the profit attributable to equity holders of the Company by the weighted number 
of shares outstanding during the period.

diluted  ePS  is  determined  by  adjusting  the  profit  or  loss  attributable  to  ordinary  shareholders  and  the  weighted 
average number of ordinary shares outstanding for the effects of all potential ordinary shares, which comprise share 
options issued.

(P) CaSh aNd CaSh EquivaLENTS
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash on hand, deposits held at call with banks, and other short-term highly 
liquid investments.  

(Q) reVenue
revenue from the sale of goods is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable. 

revenue  is  recognised  when  the  significant  risks  and  rewards  of  ownership  have  been  transferred  to  the  buyer, 
recovery of the consideration is probable, and the amount of revenue can be measured reliably. For the sale of oil the 
transfer of risks and rewards occurs on delivery of oil to the refinery.

(r) gOOdS aNd SErviCES Tax 
revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of goods and services tax (“GSt”), except where 
the amount of GSt incurred is not recoverable from the australian tax office. in these circumstances the GSt is 
recognised as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset or as part of the expense. receivables and payables in the 
balance sheet are shown inclusive of GSt. 

Cash flows are presented in the cash flow statement on a gross basis, except for the GSt component of investing and 
financing activities, which are disclosed as operating cash flows.

(S) FiNaNCE iNCOmE aNd ExPENSES
interest revenue on funds invested is recognised as it accrues, using the effective interest rate method.

Finance expenses comprise interest expense on borrowings and the unwinding of the discount on provisions.

(T) rOyaLTiES
royalties are treated as taxation arrangements when they have the characteristics of a tax. this is considered to be 
the case when they are imposed under government authority and the amount payable is calculated by reference to 
revenue derived (net of any allowable deductions) after adjustment for items comprising temporary differences. For 
such arrangements, current and deferred tax is provided on the same basis as described above for other forms of 
taxation. 

obligations arising from royalty arrangements that do not satisfy these criteria are recognised as current provisions 
and included in expenses.

(u) COmParaTivE FigurES

When  required  by  accounting  Standards,  comparative  figures  have  been  adjusted  to  conform  to  changes  in 
presentation for the current financial year.

42

2011 annual rePort

BaCK to ContentS

noteS to tHe FinanCial StatementS
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

3. 

significant accounting poLicies (continueD)

(V) neW stanDarDs anD interpretations not yet aDopteD

the aaSB has issued new and amended accounting Standards and interpretations that have mandatory application 
dates for future reporting periods and which the Group has decided not to early adopt. a discussion of those future 
requirements and their impact on the Group is as follows:
–  aaSB 9: Financial instruments (december 2010) (applicable for annual reporting periods commencing on or after 

1 January 2013).
this Standard is applicable retrospectively and includes revised requirements for the classification and measure-
ment of financial instruments, as well as recognition and derecognition requirements for financial instruments. 
the Group has not yet determined any potential impact on the financial statements.
the key changes made to accounting requirements include:
-

simplifying the classifications of financial assets into those carried at amortised cost and those carried at fair 
value;
simplifying	the	requirements	for	embedded	derivatives;
removing	the	tainting	rules	associated	with	held-to-maturity	assets;
removing  the  requirements  to  separate  and  fair  value  embedded  derivatives  for  financial  assets  carried  at 
amortised	cost;
removing  the  requirements  to  separate  and  fair  value  embedded  derivatives  for  financial  assets  carried  at 
amortised	cost;
allowing  an  irrevocable  election  on  initial  recognition  to  present  gains  and  losses  on  investments  in  equity 
instruments that are not held for trading in other comprehensive income. dividends in respect of these in-
vestments that are a return on investment can be recognised in profit or loss and there is no impairment or 
recycling	on	disposal	of	the	instrument;
requiring financial assets to be reclassified where there is a change in an entity’s business model as they are 
initially	classified	based	on:	(a)	the	objective	of	the	entity’s	business	model	for	managing	the	financial	assets;	
and	(b)	the	characteristics	of	the	contractual	cash	flows;	and
requiring an entity that chooses to measure a financial liability at fair value to present the portion of the change 
in its fair value due to changes in the entity’s own credit risk in other comprehensive income, except when that 
would create an accounting mismatch. if such a mismatch would be created or enlarged, the entity is required 
to present all changes in fair value (including the effects of changes in the credit risk of the liability) in profit 
or loss.

-
-
-

-

-

-

-

–  aaSB 124: related Party disclosures (applicable for annual reporting periods commencing on or after 1 January 

2011).
this Standard removes the requirement for government-related entities to disclose details of all transactions with 
the government and other government-related entities and clarifies the definition of a “related party” to remove 
inconsistencies and simplify the structure of the Standard. no changes are expected to materially affect the Group.
–  aaSB 2009–12: amendments to australian accounting Standards [aaSBs 5, 8, 108, 110, 112, 119, 133, 137, 139, 
1023 & 1031 and interpretations 2, 4, 16, 1039 & 1052] (applicable for annual reporting periods commencing on or 
after 1 January 2011).
this Standard makes a number of editorial amendments to a range of australian accounting Standards and in-
terpretations, including amendments to reflect changes made to the text of iFrSs by the iaSB. the Standard also 
amends aaSB 8 to require entities to exercise judgment in assessing whether a government and entities known 
to be under the control of that government are considered a single customer for the purposes of certain operating 
segment disclosures. the amendments are not expected to impact the Group.

–  aaSB  2009–14:  amendments  to  australian  interpretation  –  Prepayments  of  a  minimum  Funding  requirement 

[aaSB interpretation 14] (applicable for annual reporting periods commencing on or after 1 January 2011).
this  Standard  amends  interpretation  14  to  address  unintended  consequences  that  can  arise  from  the  previous 
accounting requirements when an entity prepays future contributions into a defined benefit pension plan.
this Standard is not expected to impact the Group.

BaCK to ContentS

Carnarvon Petroleum limited 43

noteS to tHe FinanCial StatementS
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

3. 

significant accounting poLicies (continueD)

–  aaSB 2010–4:  Further amendments to australian accounting Standards arising from the annual improvements 
Project [aaSB 1, aaSB 7, aaSB 101 & aaSB 134 and interpretation 13] (applicable for annual reporting periods 
commencing on or after 1 January 2011).
this  Standard  details  numerous  non-urgent  but  necessary  changes  to  accounting  Standards  arising  from  the 
iaSB’s annual improvements project. Key changes include:
-

clarifying  the  application  of  aaSB  108  prior  to  an  entity’s  first  australian-accounting-Standards  financial 
statements;
adding  an  explicit  statement  to  aaSB  7  that  qualitative  disclosures  should  be  made  in  the  context  of  the 
quantitative disclosures to better enable users to evaluate an entity’s exposure to risks arising from financial 
instruments;
amending  aaSB 101 to the effect that disaggregation of changes in each component of equity arising from 
transactions recognised in other comprehensive income is required to be presented, but is permitted to be 
presented	in	the	statement	of	changes	in	equity	or	in	the	notes;
adding	a	number	of	examples	to	the	list	of	events	or	transactions	that	require	disclosure	under	AASB	134;	and

-

-

-
- making sundry editorial amendments to various Standards and interpretations.
this Standard is not expected to impact the Group.

–  aaSB 2010–5: amendments to australian accounting Standards [aaSB 1, 3, 4, 5, 101, 107, 112, 118, 119, 121, 132, 
133, 134, 137, 139, 140, 1023 & 1038 and interpretations 112, 115, 127, 132 & 1042] (applicable for annual reporting 
periods beginning on or after 1 January 2011).
this Standard makes numerous editorial amendments to a range of australian accounting Standards and interpre-
tations, including amendments to reflect changes made to the text of iFrSs by the iaSB. However, these editorial 
amendments have no major impact on the requirements of the respective amended pronouncements.

–  aaSB 2010–7: amendments to australian accounting Standards arising from aaSB 9 (december 2010) [aaSB 1, 3, 
4, 5, 7, 101, 102, 108, 112, 118, 120, 121, 127, 128, 131, 132, 136, 137, 139, 1023 & 1038 and interpretations 2, 5, 10, 
12, 19 & 127] (applies to periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013).
this Standard makes amendments to a range of australian accounting Standards and interpretations as a conse-
quence of the issuance of aaSB 9: Financial instruments in december 2010. accordingly, these amendments will 
only apply when the entity adopts aaSB 9.
as noted above, the Group has not yet determined any potential impact on the financial statements from adopting 
aaSB 9.

44

2011 annual rePort

BaCK to ContentS

noteS to tHe FinanCial StatementS
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

consolidated

2011

$000

93

93

(5,143)

(3,430)

(1,823)

(6,074)

(2,421)

(18,891)

(231)

(212)

2010

$000

82

82

(5,438)

(4,118)

(2,283)

(6,928)

(2,706)

(21,473)

(251)

(204)

122

122

4. 

other income

Finance income on bank deposits

5. 

cost of saLes

Production expenses

royalty and excise

transportation

depreciation - development costs 
and producing assets
Selling, general and 
administration

6. 

other expenses

depreciation – property, plant and 
equipment

rental premises – operating leases

7. 

auDitors’ remuneration

Audit services:

auditors of the Company

8. 

earnings per share 

the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share was based on a weighted average number of shares calculated 
as follows:

issued ordinary shares at 1 July 

effect of shares issued

effect of share options exercised

2011

2010

number of shares

686,759,634

683,674,634

590,090

1,723,233

-

-

Weighted average number of ordinary shares 30 June (basic)

687,349,724

685,397,867

effect of share options on issue

-

-

Weighted average number of ordinary shares 30 June (diluted)

687,349,724

685,397,867

Profit used in calculating basic and diluted earnings per share from 
continuing operations

 $2,159,000 

$14,423,000

BaCK to ContentS

Carnarvon Petroleum limited 45

noteS to tHe FinanCial StatementS
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

9. 

taxes

(a)  Income tax expense

Numerical reconciliation between pre-tax profit and income tax expense:

consolidated

2011

$000

2011

$000

Prima facie income tax expense on pre-tax profit at 30% (2010: 30%)

4,558

11,262

tax effect of:

  Special remuneratory benefit

  effect of higher overseas tax rate

  Foreign exchange (gains) / losses

  non-deductible expenditure

  Prior year temporary differences recognised

Current year tax benefit not brought to account

income tax expense on pre tax profit 

Current income tax

deferred tax

Tax Consolidation

(1,200)

6,725

(5,142)

3,861

554

1,277

10,633

5,137

5,496

10,633

(1,856)

6,843

303

581

1,166

1,107

19,406

10,616

8,790

19,406

effective  1  July  2003,  for  the  purposes  of  australian  income  taxation,  Carnarvon  and  its  100%-owned  controlled 
entities formed a tax consolidated group.  the head entity of the tax consolidated group is Carnarvon.  

the impact of consolidating for tax purposes is that Carnarvon’s australian controlled entities are treated as divisions 
of Carnarvon rather than as separate entities for tax purposes.  the members of the group will, if required, enter into 
a tax sharing arrangement in order to allocate group tax related liabilities to contributing members on a reasonable 
basis.  the agreement will provide for the allocation of income tax liabilities between entities should the head entity 
default on its tax payment obligations.  

income tax expense has not been accrued on the profits generated by the thailand joint venture as under australian 
tax law, such profits attributable to the branch are taxed in thailand and are non-assessable in australia.

(b)  Special remuneratory benefit expense

Special remuneratory benefit

consolidated

2011

$000

2,400

2,400

2011

$000

3,711

3,711

the Group’s Phetchabun Basin Joint venture is subject to a special remuneratory benefit (“SrB”) tax on profits, at 
sliding scale rates (0% - 75% per concession). 

46

2011 annual rePort

BaCK to ContentS

noteS to tHe FinanCial StatementS
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

9. 

taxes (continueD)

the SrB, which is tax deductible in the calculation of thai income taxes (see note 9 (a)), involves a detailed calculation 
done  on  a  concession  by  concession  basis.  the  basis  of  the  calculation  is  petroleum  profits,  adjusted  for  capital 
spent, being subjected to a sliding scale SrB rate such that profits are not taxed until all capital has been recovered. 
the  sliding  scale  rate  is  principally  driven  by  production  and  pricing  but  is  subject  to  other  adjustments  such  as 
changes in thailand’s consumer price index, wholesale price index, cumulative metres drilled on the concession, 
and, for certain concessions, changes in the exchange rate between the thai Baht and the uSd. the SrB calculation 
is performed quarterly for each concession at the calculated annual rate at the end of each quarter.

the SrB is considered, for accounting purposes, to be a tax on income.

10.  traDe anD other receiVaBLes 

consolidated

Current

trade and other receivables

Cash held as security

the Group’s exposure to credit and currency risks is disclosed in note 32.

11.  property, pLant anD eQuipment

Plant and equipment

Cost: 

Balance at beginning of financial year

additions

effects of movements in foreign exchange

Balance at end of financial year

depreciation and impairment losses:

Balance at beginning of financial year

depreciation charge for year

Balance at end of financial year

Carrying amount opening

Carrying amount closing

2011

$000

4,271

1,173

5,444

2011

$000

6,348

1,432

7,780

  consolidated

2011

$000

2010

$000

447

106

(58)

495

116

76

192

331

303

42

405

-

447

32

84

116

10

331

BaCK to ContentS

Carnarvon Petroleum limited 47

noteS to tHe FinanCial StatementS
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

11.  property, pLant anD eQuipment (continueD) 

Fixtures and fittings

Cost:

Balance at beginning of financial year

additions

effects of movements in foreign exchange

Balance at end of financial year

depreciation and impairment losses:

Balance at beginning of financial year

depreciation charge for year

Balance at end of financial year

Carrying amount opening

Carrying amount closing

Land and buildings

Cost:

Balance at beginning of financial year

additions

effects of movements in foreign exchange

Balance at end of financial year

depreciation and impairment losses:

Balance at beginning of financial year

depreciation charge for year

Balance at end of financial year

Carrying amount opening

Carrying amount closing

consolidated

2011

2010

715

85

(68)

732

481

140

621

234

111

103

17

(15)

105

33

16

49

70

56

626

96

(7)

715

334

147

481

292

234

65

38

-

103

14

19

33

51

70

48

2011 annual rePort

BaCK to ContentS

noteS to tHe FinanCial StatementS
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

11.  property, pLant anD eQuipment (continueD) 

Total

Cost:

Balance at beginning of financial year

additions

effects of movements in foreign exchange

Balance at end of financial year

depreciation and impairment losses:

Balance at beginning of financial year

depreciation charge for year

Balance at end of financial year

Carrying amount opening

Carrying amount closing

12. 

inVentories

Current

Consumables

13.  other assets

Current

deposits and prepayments

14.  expLoration anD eVaLuation expenDiture

Cost:

Balance at beginning of financial year

additions

exploration expenditure written off

Balance at end of financial year

consolidated

2011

2010

1,266

207

(141)

1,332

631

231

862

635

470

733

540

(7)

1,266

380

251

631

353

635

3,381

4,090

287

440

6,351

10,851

(11,247)

5,955

1,219

5,516

(384)

6,351

the  exploration  expenditure  written  off  during  the  2011  financial  year  consists  of  $7,856,000  in  relation  to  the 
exploration expenses incurred in the l20/50 concession to date and $3,391,00 for the tuatara well drilled in PeP 
38254. 

BaCK to ContentS

Carnarvon Petroleum limited 49

noteS to tHe FinanCial StatementS
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

15.  oiL anD gas assets

Cost:

Balance at beginning of financial year

additions

effects of movements in foreign exchange

Balance at end of financial year

depreciation and impairment losses:

Balance at beginning of financial year

depreciation charge for year

Balance at end of financial year

Carrying amount opening

Carrying amount closing

consolidated

2011

2010

90,127

20,460

(13,038)

97,549

19,951

5,916

25,867

70,176

71,682

62,914

28,087

(874)

90,127

13,213

6,738

19,951

49,701

70,176

16.  Joint Ventures

the Group has the following interests in joint venture assets:

Joint venture

ThaiLaNd

principal activities

ownership interest %

2011

2010

Phetchabun Basin Concession,  
exploration Blocks l44/43 and l33/43 
3/2546/60 and 5/2546/62 Concessions

exploration, development and  
production of hydrocarbons

exploration Block l20/50 
7/2551/98 Concession

exploration Blocks l52/50 and  
l53/50 3/2553/105 concession

wESTErN auSTraLia

Wa-435-P, Wa-436-P, Wa-437-P,  
Wa 438-P, roebuck Basin

exploration for hydrocarbons

exploration for hydrocarbons

exploration for hydrocarbons

Wa-443-P, roebuck Basin

exploration for hydrocarbons

Wa-399-P, Carnarvon Basin

exploration for hydrocarbons

iNdONESia

40%

50%

50%

50%

100%

13%

40%

50%

50%

50%

100%

50%

rangkas, West Java Basin

exploration for hydrocarbons

25%

25%

NEw ZEaLaNd

PeP 38524

exploration for hydrocarbons

10%

-

50

2011 annual rePort

BaCK to ContentS

noteS to tHe FinanCial StatementS
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

16.  Joint Ventures (continueD)

Summary financial information for joint venture assets, as included in the consolidated statement of financial position 
and statement of comprehensive income, is shown below:

Current assets

Cash and cash equivalents

trade and other receivables

inventories

other assets

total current assets

non-current assets

Property, plant and equipment

exploration and evaluation

oil and gas assets

total non-current assets

total assets

Current liabilities

trade and other payables

Current tax

Provisions

total current liabilities

non-current liabilities

  deferred tax

total non-current liabilities

total liabilities

net assets

income

expenses

net profit after tax

2011

$000

9,349

4,504

3,381

264

2010

$000

7,497

7,097

4,090

318

17,498

19,002

408

5,807

71,682

77,897

95,395

4,046

875

-

4,921

28,802

28,802

33,723

61,672

531

6,176

70,176

76,883

95,885

4,927

6,165

2,172

13,264

23,306

23,306

36,570

59,315

54,750

(43,171)

11,579

65,275

(44,590)

20,685

Capital commitments and contingent liabilities for the joint ventures are disclosed in notes 22 and 23 respectively.

BaCK to ContentS

Carnarvon Petroleum limited 51

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
noteS to tHe FinanCial StatementS
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

17.  traDe anD other payaBLes 

Current

trade payables 

non-trade payables and accrued expenses

owing to related parties

consolidated

2011

2010

220

4,611

64

4,895

307

5,298

16

5,621

the Group’s exposure to currency and liquidity risk related to trade and other payables is disclosed in note 32.

18.  proVisions 

Current

Special remuneratory Benefit - thailand

consolidated

2011

$000

2010

$000

-

-

2,172

2,172

Provision for restoration costs
there are no restoration provisions required in respect of the Group’s activities under current thai legislation.

19.  DeferreD tax

Recognised deferred tax assets and liabilities
the net deferred tax liability is attributable to the following:

oil and gas assets

tax value of losses carry forward 

net tax liability

30,241

(1,439)

28,802

25,267

(1,961)

23,306

the movement in the deferred tax liability during the reporting period has all been recognised in the income statement.

unrecognised deferred tax assets and liabilities

deferred tax assets have not been recognised in respect of the following items:

australian tax loses

4,256

3,691

the tax losses do not expire under current tax legislation. deferred tax assets have not been recognised in respect of 
these items because it is not probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the Group can utilise 
the benefits. as explained in note 9(a), income tax is not payable in australia on the profits generated by the thailand 
joint venture as under australian tax law, such profits attributable to the branch are taxed in thailand and are non-
assessable in australia.

52

2011 annual rePort

BaCK to ContentS

 
 
 
noteS to tHe FinanCial StatementS
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

20.    capitaL anD reserVes

Issued capital

Balance at beginning of financial year

employee Share Plan issues

Balance at end of financial year

Issued capital

Balance at beginning of financial year

employee Share Plan related movements

employee Share Plan loans repaid

Share issue transaction costs

Balance at end of financial year

company

2011

2010

number of shares

686,759,634

683,674,634

1,061,000

3,085,000

687,820,634

686,759,634

company

2011

$000

2010

$000

68,240

68,090

-

-

-

46

111

(7)

68,240

68,240

ordinary shares have the right to one vote per share at meetings of the Company, to receive dividends as declared 
and, in the event of a winding-up of the Company, to participate  in the proceeds from the sale of all surplus assets 
in proportion to the number of, and amounts paid up on, shares held. 

Translation reserve
movements in the translation reserve are set out in the Statement of Changes in equity on page 32.

the  translation  reserve  comprises  all  foreign  exchange  differences  arising  from  the  translation  of  the  financial 
statements  of  foreign  operations  where  their  functional  currency  is  different  to  the  presentation  currency  of  the 
reporting entity.

Share based payments reserve
movements in the share based payments reserve are set out in the Statements of Changes in equity on page 32. 

this reserve represents the fair value of shares issued under the Company’s eSP. this reserve is reversed against 
issued capital when shares are issued on exercise of options issued under the previous employee option plan or the 
loan is repaid under the current eSP.

BaCK to ContentS

Carnarvon Petroleum limited 53

noteS to tHe FinanCial StatementS
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

21.  reconciLiation of cash fLoWs from operating actiVities

(a) Cash flows from operating activities

Profit for the year

Adjustments for:

equity settled share based payment expense

deferred tax expense

depreciation 

Foreign exchange losses

exploration expenditure written off

operating profit before changes in working capital and provisions:

Changes in assets and liabilities:

decrease in trade and other receivables

decrease / (increase) in inventories

decrease in other assets

(decrease) in trade and other payables

(decrease) in provisions and employee benefits

net cash flows generated from operating activities

(b) Reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents

consolidated

2011

$000

2010

$000

2,159

14,423

207

5,496

6,074

4,463

11,247

29,646

1,736

115

107

(726)

(7,407)

23,471

753

8,790

6,930

525

-

31,421

2,550

(225)

237

(1,280)

  (399)

32,304

Cash at bank and at call

14,798

30,255

the Group’s exposure to interest rate risk and a sensitivity analysis for financial assets and liabilities is disclosed in 
note 32.

restricted  cash  of  $1,173,000  consolidated  is  included  under  trade  and  other  receivables  (2010:$1,432,000 
consolidated), see notes 10 and 23. Since the year end, $422,222 has been released from restricted cash to cash and 
cash equivalents as a result of the completion of the l20/50 drilling campaign.

54

2011 annual rePort

BaCK to ContentS

 
noteS to tHe FinanCial StatementS
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

22.  capitaL anD other commitments

(a) Joint venture commitments

Share of capital commitments of joint 
venture assets:
  Within one year
Capital commitments of the Group to joint 
venture assets:
  Within one year

consolidated

2011

$000

2010

$000

394

1,572

4,740

4,864

(b) Exploration expenditure commitments
due  to  the  nature  of  the  Group’s  operations  in  exploring  and  evaluating  areas  of  interest  it  is  necessary  to  incur 
expenditure in order to retain the Group’s present permit interests.  expenditure commitments on exploration permits 
can be reduced by selective relinquishment of exploration tenure, by the renegotiation of expenditure commitments, 
or by farming out portions of the Group’s equity. 

exploration expenditure commitments forecast but not provided for in the financial statements are as follows:

less than one year

Between one and five years

(c) Capital expenditure commitments
data licence commitments

consolidated

2011

$000

350

1,450

1,800

2010

$000

5,500

4,500

10,000

236

231

BaCK to ContentS

Carnarvon Petroleum limited 55

noteS to tHe FinanCial StatementS
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

23.  contingencies 

the directors are of the opinion that provisions are not required in respect of these matters as it is not probable that 
a future sacrifice of economic benefits will be required or the amount is not capable of reliable measurement.

Contingent liabilities considered remote
a) the Phetchabun Basin Joint venture operation, in which the Group has a 40% interest, has procured the issue of 
bank guarantees for an amount of 40 million thai Baht (a$1,225,768) as security in lieu of bonds. 

the l20/50 Joint venture, in which the Group has a 50% interest, has procured the issue of bank guarantees for an 
amount of 20 million thai Baht (a$612,884) as security in lieu of bonds.

the Company has provided a cash bond of uS$450,000 (a$424,620) to the department of mineral Fuels in thailand 
in respect of its obligations for its 50% interest in the l20/50 concession in thailand. the bond is secured by a cash 
deposit of uS$450,000 (a$424,620) held with Company’s australian bank. the Company and its joint venture partner, 
who has provided a similar guarantee to the department of mineral Fuels, have signed a Cross deed of indemnity in 
respect of their respective rights and interests.

the  restricted  cash  held  by  the  banks  as  security  for  these  bonds  and  guarantees  totaling  $1,173,000  (2010: 
$1,432,000) is classified under “trade and other receivables”.

b)  in  accordance  with  normal  petroleum  industry  practice,  the  Group  has  entered  into  joint  ventures  and  farmin 
agreements with other parties for the purpose of exploring and developing its petroleum permit interests.  if a party 
to a joint venture defaults and does not contribute its share of joint venture obligations, then the other joint venturers 
are liable to meet those obligations.  in this event, the interest in the permit held by the defaulting party may be 
redistributed to the remaining joint venturers.

24.  empLoyee Benefits

Current:

liability for annual leave

consolidated

2011

$000

146

2010

$000

91

Share based payments - Employee Share Plan
under the terms of the Carnarvon employee Share Plan (“eSP”), as approved by shareholders, the Company may, in 
its absolute discretion, make an offer of ordinary fully paid shares in the Company to any eligible Person, to be funded 
by a limited recourse interest free loan granted by the Company.

the issue price is determined by the directors and is not to be less than the weighted average market price of the 
Company’s shares on the five trading days prior to the date of offer. eligible Persons use the above-mentioned loan 
to acquire plan shares. 

56

2011 annual rePort

BaCK to ContentS

noteS to tHe FinanCial StatementS
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

24.  empLoyee Benefits (continueD)

the movements in the eSP during the financial year, including those held by Key management Personnel, were as 
follows:

1 July 2010

issued

repaid

30 June 2011

number of shares

16,628,199

1,061,000

loan 

average loan per share 

3,445,013

$0.21

471,084

$.044

-

-

-

17,689,199

3,916,097

$0.22

Shares issued under the eSP are accounted for in accordance with the aaSB 2.

the fair value of shares issued under the eSP is measured by reference to their fair value using the Black-Scholes 
model, as set out below.

fair value of share options and  
related assumptions

key management 
personnel
2011

key 
management 
personnel
2010

other  
employees
2011

other  
employees
2010

Fair value at measurement date (cents)
Share price at date of issue (cents)
exercise price (cents)
expected volatility
actual / assumed option life
expected dividends
risk-free interest rate
Share-based expense recognised 

19.5
44.4
44.4
60%
3 years
nil
4.75%
$78,126

23.7 to 24.2
54 to 66
54 to 55
62.5%
3 years
nil
3.25%
$387,171

19.5
44.4
44.4
60%
3 years
nil
4.75%
$129,104

24.2 to 27.0
54 to 60.7
54 to 60.7
62.5%
3 years
nil
3.25% to 3.75%
$365,997

the current year volatility is intended to reflect the movement of the Company’s share price during the financial year.

Further details of shares and options issued to directors are set out in note 28, and in the remuneration report set 
out on pages 20 to 25.

BaCK to ContentS

Carnarvon Petroleum limited 57

noteS to tHe FinanCial StatementS
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

25.  reLateD party DiscLosures 

ultimate parent
Carnarvon Petroleum limited is the ultimate parent company.

Wholly-owned group transactions
during the reporting period there have been transactions between the Company and its controlled entities and joint 
ventures. the Company provided accounting and administrative services to its controlled entities for which it did not 
charge a management fee.

during  the  financial  year  ended  30  June  2011  net  receipts  from  controlled  entities  totalled  $3,873,000  (2010:  net 
receipts from controlled entities $22,093,000).

the carrying value of loans to controlled entities at 30 June 2011 was $14,186,000 (2010: $8,420,000) after provisions 
of $693,000 (2010: $693,000). these loans are unsecured, non-interest bearing, and have no fixed terms of repayment. 

Other related party balances
at 30 June 2011 an amount of $63,903 (2010: $15,906) is included in Company and consolidated trade and other 
payables for outstanding director fees and expenses.

26.  operating Leases

Leases as lessee
non-cancellable operating lease rentals are payable as follows:

less than one year

Between one and five years

consolidated

2011
$000

252

385

637

2010
$000

245

71

316

during the reporting period $245,000 was recognised as an expense in the consolidated income statement in respect 
of operating leases (2010: $325,000).

27.  segment information

the Group reports one segment, oil and gas exploration, development and production, to the chief operating decision 
maker, being the board of Carnarvon Petroleum limited, in assessing performance and determining the allocation 
of resources. the financial information presented in the statement of cash flows is the same basis as that presented 
to chief operating decision maker.

Basis of accounting for purposes of reporting by operating segments
unless otherwise stated, all amounts reported to the chief operating decision maker are determined in accordance 
with accounting policies that are consistent to those adopted in the annual financial statements of the Group. 

58

2011 annual rePort

BaCK to ContentS

noteS to tHe FinanCial StatementS
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

27.  segment information (continueD)

Revenue by geographical region
revenue, including interest income, is disclosed below based on the location of the external customer:

thailand

australia

2011
$000

54,797

46

54,843

2010
$000

65,275

37

65,312

the Group derives 100% of its sales revenue from one customer in the oil and gas exploration, development and 
production segment.

Assets by geographical region
the location of segment assets is disclosed below by geographical location of the assets:

thailand

australia

indonesia

2011
$000

90,399

8,425

3,193

2010
$000

94,488

23,792

1,447

102,017

119,727

28.  key management personneL DiscLosures

(a) Key management personnel compensation

Key  management  personnel  compensation  included  in  employee  benefits  expense,  directors  emoluments,  share 
based payments and administration expenses are as follows:

Short term employee benefits

Post-employment benefits

Share-based payments

consolidated

2011
$000

1,733

96

78

1,907

2010
$000

1,598

88

387

2,073

information regarding individual directors and executives’ compensation and some equity instruments disclosures, 
as permitted by Corporations regulation 2m.3.03, are provided in the remuneration report section of the directors’ 
report as set out on pages 20 to 25. 

apart from the details disclosed in this note, no director has entered into a material contract with the Company or the 
Group since the end of the previous financial year and there were no material contracts involving directors’ interests 
existing at year end.

BaCK to ContentS

Carnarvon Petroleum limited 59

noteS to tHe FinanCial StatementS
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

28.  key management personneL DiscLosures (continueD)

(b) Loans to key management personnel and their related parties
details of loans to key management personnel and their related parties, which are all interest free loans with limited 
recourse security over the plan shares provided in accordance with the Company’s employee Share Plan (“eSP”), are 
set out below. 

2011

Directors

PJ leonhardt*

eP Jacobson*

Executives

PP Huizenga

aC Cook

2010

Directors

PJ leonhardt*

eP Jacobson*

Executives

PP Huizenga

ra anderson

aC Cook

Balance
1 July 2010 ($)

Balance
30 June 2011 ($)

highest balance 
in period 
($)

Loaned 
in period ($)

repaid
in period ($)

270,000

540,000

357,500

750,000

270,000

540,000

446,300

838,800

270,000

540,000

446,300

838,800

-

-

88,800

88,800

-

-

-

-

Balance
1 July 2009 ($)

Balance
30 June 2010 ($)

highest balance 
in period 
($)

Loaned 
in period ($)

repaid
in period ($)

270,000

540,000

253.100

81,065

-

270,000

540,000

357,500

70,100

750,000

270,000

540,000

357,500

81,065

750,000

-

-

104,400

-

750,000

-

-

-

10,965

-

* the loans to directors were made in 2006 in lieu of normal remuneration at a time the Company had no full time 
employees and limited cash resources.

details  regarding  the  aggregate  of  loans,  all  of  which  are  interest-free,  made  by  the  Group  to  key  management 
personnel and their related parties, and the number of individuals in each group, are as follows:

2011

2010

opening 
balance ($)

1,647,500

810,253

closing
balance ($)

number in 
group at 30 June

1,825,100

1,167,500

3

3

(c) Other key management personnel transactions 
amounts payable to key management personnel or their related parties at reporting date in respect of outstanding 
director and consulting fees and expenses are as follows:

Current

trade and other payables

consolidated

2011
$000

2010
$000

65

16

60

2011 annual rePort

BaCK to ContentS

noteS to tHe FinanCial StatementS
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

28.  key management personneL DiscLosures (continueD)

(d)  Movements in shares
the movement during the reporting period in the number of ordinary shares in Carnarvon Petroleum limited held, 
directly, indirectly or beneficially, by each key management person, including their related parties, is as follows:

held at
1 July 2010

net
acquired/ (sold)

award under
employee 
share plan

received on
exercise 
of options

held at
30 June 2011

2011

Directors

PJ leonhardt

17,000,000

eP Jacobson

31,037,335

-

-

8,400,000

200,000

-

1,600,000

1,594,839

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

200,000

200,000

-

-

-

-

-

-

17,000,000

31,037,335

8,600,000

-

1,800,000

1,794,839

held at
1 July 2009

net
acquired/ (sold)

award under
employee 
share plan

received on
exercise 
of options

held at
30 June 2010

nC Fearis

W Foster

Executives

PP Huizenga

aC Cook

2010

Directors

PJ leonhardt

17,000,000

-

eP Jacobson

30,917,335

120,000

nC Fearis

KP Judge

8,400,000

-

10,932,855

(4,000,000)

Executives

PP Huizenga

ra anderson

aC Cook

2,100,000

1,485,000

-

(500,000)

(532,000)

169,839

-

-

-

-

-

-

1,425,000

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

17,000,000

31,037,335

8,400,000

6,932,855

1,600,000

962,000

1,594,839

Shares  allotted  under  the  eSP  were  funded  by  interest-free  loans  with  a  limited  recourse  security  over  the  plan 
shares and subject to the detailed rules of the eSP. 

in accordance with aaSB 2 the issue of shares under the eSP is accounted for using the Black-Scholes model, and 
their valuation assumptions are set out in note 24.

information regarding individual directors’ and executives’ compensation, including company loans used to finance 
the purchase of the eSP shares, is provided in the remuneration report section of the directors’ report as set out 
on pages 20 to 25.

BaCK to ContentS

Carnarvon Petroleum limited 61

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
noteS to tHe FinanCial StatementS
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

29.  non-key management personneL DiscLosures

Identity of related parties
the Group has a related party relationship with its controlled entities (see note 30), joint venture assets (see note 16), 
and with its key management personnel (see note 28).

30.  consoLiDateD entities

name

Company

Carnarvon Petroleum ltd

Controlled entities

country of incorporation

2011

2010

ownership interest

Carnarvon thailand ltd

British virgin islands

lassoc Pty ltd

Srl exploration Pty ltd

Carnarvon Petroleum (indonesia)  Pty ltd

australia

australia

australia

Carnarvon (nZ) Pty ltd

new Zealand

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

investments in controlled entities are measured at cost in the financial statements of the Company.

31.  suBseQuent eVents

no  matters  or  circumstance  has  arisen  since  30  June  2011  that  in  the  opinion  of  the  directors  has  significantly 
affected, or may significantly affect in future financial years:

(iv)	The	Group’s	operations;	or

(v)	The	results	of	those	operations;	or

(vi) the Group’s state of affairs

32.  financiaL risk management

the Group’s activities expose it to market risk (including currency risk, commodity price risk and interest rate risk), 
credit risk and liquidity risk. 

this note presents qualitative and quantitative information about the Group’s exposure to each of the above risks, 
their objectives, policies and procedures for managing risk, and the management of capital. the Board of directors 
has overall responsibility for the establishment and oversight of the risk management framework.

the Group’s overall risk management approach focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to 
minimize the potential adverse effects on the financial performance of the Group. the Group does not currently use 
derivative financial instruments to hedge financial risk exposures and therefore it is exposed to daily movements in 
the international oil prices, exchange rates, and interest rates.

the Group uses various methods to measure different types of risk to which it is exposed. these methods include 
sensitivity analysis in the case of interest rate, foreign exchange, and commodity price risk and ageing analysis for 
credit risk.

62

2011 annual rePort

BaCK to ContentS

noteS to tHe FinanCial StatementS
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

32.  financiaL risk management (continueD)

the Board’s policy is to maintain a strong capital base so as to maintain investor, creditor, and market confidence 
and to sustain future development of the business. Given the stage of the Group’s development there are no formal 
targets set for return on capital. there were no changes to the Group’s approach to capital management during the 
year. neither the Company nor any of its controlled entities are subject to externally imposed capital requirements.

(a)  Commodity price risk
Commodity price risk is the risk of financial loss resulting from movements in the price of the Group’s commodity 
output, being crude oil.

revenues  under  the  Group’s  contractual  arrangements  with  its  customer  are  denominated  in  uS$,  linked  to  the 
uS$ prices of a basket of oil products, and paid in thai Baht at the average monthly exchange rate. the Group does 
not currently use derivative financial instruments to hedge commodity price risk and therefore is exposed to daily 
movements in the prices of these oil products.

Sensitivity analysis
an increase of 10% in the achieved monthly oil sale price would have increased equity and pre tax profit and loss 
by the amounts shown below. this analysis assumes that all other variables other than royalties, which are directly 
related to oil revenues, remain constant. the analysis is performed on the same basis for 2010:

30 June 2011

30 June 2010

consolidated

equity

$000

5,141

6,177

profit and loss

$000

5,141

6,177

a decrease of 10% in the achieved monthly oil sale price would have decreased equity and pre tax profit and loss 
by the amounts shown below. this analysis assumes that all other variables other than royalties, which are directly 
related to oil revenues, remain constant. the analysis is performed on the same basis for 2010:

30 June 2011

30 June 2010

consolidated

equity

$000

(5,141)

(6,177)

profit and loss

$000

(5,141)

(6,177)

(b)  Interest rate risk
the significance and management of the risks to the Group is dependent on a number of factors including:

Interest	rates	(current	and	forward)	and	the	currencies	that	are	held;
Level	of	cash	and	liquid	investments	and	their	term;

•	
•	
•	 Maturity	dates	of	investments;
•	 Proportion of investments that are fixed rate or floating rate.

the Group manages the risk by maintaining an appropriate mix between fixed and floating rate investments. 

BaCK to ContentS

Carnarvon Petroleum limited 63

noteS to tHe FinanCial StatementS
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

32.  financiaL risk management (continueD)

at the reporting date the effective interest rates of variable rate interest bearing financial instruments of the Group 
were as follows. there were no interest-bearing financial liabilities.

Carrying amount (A$000) 
Financial assets – cash and cash equivalents

Weighted average interest rate (%)
Financial assets – cash and cash equivalents

Sensitivity analysis
all other financial assets are non interest bearing.

consolidated

2011

2010

14,798

30,255

0.24%

0.3%

an increase in 50 basis points from the weighted average year-end interest rates at 30 June would have increased 
equity  and  profit  and  loss  by  the  amounts  shown  below.  this  analysis  assumes  that  all  other  variables  remain 
constant. the analysis is performed on the same basis for 2010:

30 June 2011

30 June 2010

consolidated

equity

$000

155

188

profit and loss

$000

155

188

a decrease in 50 basis points from the weighted average year-end interest rates at 30 June would have decreased 
equity  and  profit  and  loss  by  the  amounts  shown  below.  this  analysis  assumes  that  all  other  variables  remain 
constant. the analysis is performed on the same basis for 2010:

30 June 2011

30 June 2010

consolidated

equity

$000

(21)

(43)

profit and loss

$000

(21)

(43)

(c)  Credit risk 
Credit risk refers to the risk that a counter party will default on its contractual obligations resulting in a financial loss 
to the Group, and arises principally from the Group’s receivables from customers and cash deposits. 

the Group’s trade receivables at both June 2011 and June 2010 are all due from an entity located in thailand and 
controlled by its government. this entity has an appropriate credit history with the Group. there were no receivables 
at 30 June 2011 or 30 June 2010 that were past due.

Cash transactions are limited to financial institutions considered to have a suitable credit rating.

Credit risk further arises in relation to financial guarantees given to certain parties, refer to note 23. 

exposure to credit risk is considered minimal but is monitored on an ongoing basis. the maximum exposure to credit 
risk is represented by the carrying amount of each financial asset in the balance sheet.

64

2011 annual rePort

BaCK to ContentS

noteS to tHe FinanCial StatementS
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

32.  financiaL risk management (continueD)

the carrying amount of the Group’s financial assets represents the maximum credit exposure. the Group’s maximum 
exposure to credit risk at the reporting date was:

Carrying amount:

Cash and cash equivalents

trade and other receivables

the aging of the Group’s trade receivables at reporting date was:

not past due

gross

2011

$000

3,757

3,757

impairment

2011

$000

-

-

consolidated

2011

$000

14,798

5,444

20,242

gross

2010

$000

5,884

5,884

2010

$000

30,255

7,780

38,035

impairment

2010

$000

-

-

Based on historical default rates, the Group believes that no impairment allowance is necessary in respect of trade 
receivables.

(d)  Currency risk 
Currency risk arises from sales, purchases, assets and liabilities that are denominated in a currency other than the 
functional currencies of the entities within the Group, being the a$, tHB and uS$. 

the Group operates predominantly in thailand and is exposed to currency risk arising from various foreign currency 
exposures, mainly with respect to the uS$ and thai Baht (“tHB”).

Cash  receipts  from  the  thai  operations,  which  comprise  100%  of  the  Group  revenues,  are  received  in  thai  Baht. 
the majority of the Group’s payments, including thai SrB and income tax, are also payable in tHB which effectively 
creates a natural hedge. the Company’s foreign exchange risk predominantly resides in its uS$ loans to its controlled 
entities.

the Group does not currently use derivative financial instruments to hedge foreign currency risk and therefore is 
exposed to daily movements in exchange rates. However, the Group intends to maintain sufficient tHB cash balances 
to meet its tHB obligations, in particular its SrB and income tax liabilities. 

BaCK to ContentS

Carnarvon Petroleum limited 65

noteS to tHe FinanCial StatementS
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

32.  financiaL risk management (continueD)

the Group’s exposure to foreign currency risk at balance date was as follows, based on carrying amounts.

Consolidated 2011

Cash and cash equivalents

trade and other receivables

trade payables and accruals

SrB and income tax provisions

Gross balance sheet exposure

Consolidated 2010

Cash and cash equivalents

trade and other receivables

trade payables and accruals

SrB and income tax provisions

Gross balance sheet exposure

thB

a$000

8,702

3,891

(3,580)

(874)

8,139

6,878

5,884

(4,082)

(8,337)

343

usD

a$000

5,737

571

(466)

-

5,842

16,333

-

(16)

-

16,317

the following significant exchange rates applied during the year:

aud to:

1 thai baht
1 uSd

average rate

reporting date spot rate

2011

0.033
1.02

2010

0.034
1.14

2011

0.031
0.94

2010

0.036
1.17

Sensitivity analysis
a 10% strengthening of the aud against the tHB for the 12 months to 30 June 2011 and 30 June 2010 would have 
decreased  equity  and  pre  tax  profit  and  loss  by  the  amounts  shown  below.  this  analysis  assumes  that  all  other 
variables, in particular interest rates and the exchange rate between the thai Baht and uSd, remain constant:

30 June 2011

tHB

30 June 2010

tHB

consolidated

equity

$000

profit and loss

$000

(11,867)

(3,049)

(10,389)

(3,167)

66

2011 annual rePort

BaCK to ContentS

noteS to tHe FinanCial StatementS
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

32.  financiaL risk management (continueD)

a  10%  weakening  of  the  aud  against  the  tHB  for  the  12  months  to  30  June  2011  and  30  June  2010  would  have 
increased  equity  and  pre  tax  profit  and  loss  by  the  amounts  shown  below.  this  analysis  assumes  that  all  other 
variables, in particular interest rates and the exchange rate between the thai Baht and uSd, remain constant:

30 June 2011

tHB

30 June 2010

tHB

(e)  Fair values

consolidated

equity

$000

profit and loss

$000

14,504

3,954

12,675

3,746

the fair values of financial assets and financial liabilities, together with their carrying amounts shown in the balance 
sheet, are as follows:

Consolidated

loans and receivables

Cash and cash equivalents

trade and other payables

carrying amount

fair Value

carrying  amount

fair Value

 2011
$000

5,444

14,798

(4,895)

15,347

2011
$000

5,444

14,798

(4,895)

15,347

2010
$000

7,780

30,255

(5,621)

32,414

2010
$000

7,780

30,255

(5,621)

32,414

the basis for determining fair values is disclosed in note 3(h).

(f)  Liquidity risk
liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will not be able to meet its financial obligations as and when they fall due. the 
Group’s approach to managing this risk is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will always have sufficient liquidity to 
meet its liabilities when due under a range of financial conditions. the net cashflows arising from its thai assets are 
considered to generate sufficient working capital to adequately address this risk.

the Group currently does not have any available lines of credit.

BaCK to ContentS

Carnarvon Petroleum limited 67

noteS to tHe FinanCial StatementS
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

32.  financiaL risk management (continueD)

the  following  are  the  contractual  maturities  of  financial  liabilities,  including  estimated  interest  payments  and 
excluding the impact of any netting agreements:

carrying amount

contractual 
cashflows

$000

$000

6 months 
or less

$000

6 to 12 months 

$000

Consolidated 2011

Non-derivative financial liabilities

trade and other payables

SrB and income tax provisions

Consolidated 2010

Non-derivative financial liabilities

trade and other payables

SrB and income tax provisions

4,895

875

5,770

5,621

8,337

13,958

4,895

875

5,770

5,621

8,337

13,958

4,895

875

5,770

 5,621

6,165

11,786

-

-

-

-

2,172

2,172

33.  parent information

the following information has been extracted from the books and records of the parent and has been prepared in 
accordance with the accounting standards: 

STaTEmENT OF FiNaNCiaL POSiTiON

Current assets

non-current assets

total assets

Current liabilities

non-current liabilities

total liabilities

equity

issued Capital

accumulated losses

reserves

total equity

STaTEmENT OF COmPrEhENSivE iNCOmE

total profit / (loss)

total comprehensive income

2011

$000

6,799

17,521

24,320

493

-

493

68,240

(46,458)

2,045

23,827

(9,102)

(9,102)

2010

$000

23,717

9,439

33,156

418

-

418

68,240

(37,340)

1,838

32,738

14,011

14,011

68

2011 annual rePort

BaCK to ContentS

noteS to tHe FinanCial StatementS
FOR THE yEAR ENDED 30 JuNE 2011

33.  parent information (continueD) 

ParENT CONTiNgENCiES
the Company has provided a cash bond of uS$450,000 (a$424,620) to the department of mineral Fuels in thailand 
in respect of its obligations for its 50% interest in the l20/50 concession in thailand. the bond is secured by a cash 
deposit of uS$450,000 (a$424,620) held with Company’s australian bank. the Company and its joint venture partner, 
who has provided a similar guarantee to the department of mineral Fuels, have signed a Cross deed of indemnity in 
respect of their respective rights and interests.this restricted cash held by the banks as security for these bonds and 
guarantees is classified under “trade and other receivables”.

in  accordance  with  normal  petroleum  industry  practice,  the  Group  has  entered  into  joint  ventures  and  farmin 
agreements with other parties for the purpose of exploring and developing its petroleum permit interests.  if a party 
to a joint venture defaults and does not contribute its share of joint venture obligations, then the other joint venturers 
are liable to meet those obligations.  in this event, the interest in the permit held by the defaulting party may be 
redistributed to the remaining joint venturers.

parent

2011

$000

2010

$000

ParENT CaPiTaL aNd OThEr COmmiTmENTS

(a) Joint venture commitments

Capital commitments of the Group to joint venture assets:

    Within one year

4,740

4,864

(b) Exploration expenditure commitments
due to the nature of the Company’s operations in exploring and evaluating areas of interest it is necessary to incur 
expenditure in order to retain the Company’s present permit interests.  expenditure commitments on exploration 
permits  can  be  reduced  by  selective  relinquishment  of  exploration  tenure,  by  the  renegotiation  of  expenditure 
commitments, or by farming out portions of the Company’s equity. 

exploration expenditure commitments forecast but not provided for in the financial statements are as follows:

less than one year

Between one and five years

(c) Capital expenditure commitments

data licence commitments

non-cancellable operating lease rentals are payable as follows:

less than one year

Between one and five years

350

1,450

1,800

236

145

318

463

5,500

4,500

10,000

230

149

14

163

BaCK to ContentS

Carnarvon Petroleum limited 69

direCtorS’ deClaration

(1)   

in the opinion of the directors of Carnarvon Petroleum limited: 

(a)  the  financial  statements  and  notes  of  the  Group  set  out  on  pages  29  to  69  are  in  accordance  with  the 

Corporations act 2001, including:

(i)  giving a true and fair view of the Group’s financial position as at 30 June 2011 and of its performance, as 
represented	by	the	results	of	its	operations	and	its	cash	flows,	for	the	financial	year	ended	on	that	date;	and

(ii)  complying with australian accounting Standards (including the australian accounting interpretations) and 

the	Corporations	Regulations	2001;	and

(b)	 the	financial	statements	comply	with	International	Financial	Reporting	Standards	as	set	out	in	Note	2;	and

(c)  the remuneration disclosures that are contained in the remuneration report in the directors report comply 
with australian accounting Standard aaSB 124 related Party disclosures, the Corporations act 2001 and the 
Corporations	Regulations	2001;	and

(d)  there  are  reasonable  grounds  to  believe  that  the  Company  will  be  able  to  pay  its  debts  as  and  when  they 

become due and payable.

(2)   

this declaration has been made after receiving the declarations required to be made to the directors in accordance
with section 295a of the Corporations act 2001 for the financial period ending 30 June 2011.

Signed in accordance with a resolution of the directors.

pJ Leonhardt
director
Perth, 31 august 2011

70

2011 annual rePort

BaCK to ContentS

 
 
indePendent audit rePort

BaCK to ContentS

Carnarvon Petroleum limited 71

indePendent audit rePort

72

2011 annual rePort

BaCK to ContentS

CorPorate GovernanCe Statement

iNTrOduCTiON
the Company’s directors are fully cognisant of the Corporate Governance Principles and Best Practice recommendations 
published by the aSX Corporate Governance Council (“CGC”) and have adopted those recommendations where they are 
appropriate to the Company’s circumstances.

However, a number of those principles and recommendations are directed towards listed companies considerably larger than 
Carnarvon, whose circumstances and requirements accordingly differ markedly from the Company’s.  For example, the nature 
of  the  Company’s  operations  and  its  low  direct  employee  count  mean  that  a  number  of  the  board  committees  and  other 
governance structures recommended by the CGC are not only unnecessary in Carnarvon’s case, but the effort and expense 
required to establish and maintain them would, in the directors’ view, be an unjustified diversion of shareholders’ funds.

Carnarvon’s directors are aware that according to one school of thought listed companies will be rated by the investment 
community according to their compliance with the CGC’s Best Practice recommendations.  However, in the directors’ view 
that approach is not soundly based, particularly where unquestioning compliance with the recommendations would produce 
marginal or no benefit to shareholders.

in discharging its functions Carnarvon’s board of directors receives competent legal and other professional advice. Based 
on that advice the board is satisfied that, notwithstanding non-compliance with the Best Practice recommendations (to the 
extent noted below), the Company’s governance structures are appropriate for its circumstances and the board acts at all 
times in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.

the  following  additional  information  about  the  Company’s  corporate  governance  practices  is  set  out  on  the  Company’s 
website at www.carnarvon.com.au:

•	 Corporate	governance	disclosures	and	explanations;
•	 Statement	of	Board	and	management	functions;
•	 Composition	of	the	Board	and	new	appointments;
•	 Committees	of	the	Board;
•	 Summary	of	code	of	conduct	for	directors;
•	 Summary	of	policy	on	securities	trading;
•	 Audit	Committee	Charter;
•	 Summary	of	policy	and	procedures	for	compliance	with	ASX	Listing	Rule	disclosure	requirements;
•	 Summary	of	arrangements	regarding	communication	with	and	participation	of	shareholders;
•	 Summary	of	Company’s	risk	management	policy;	and
•	 Corporate code of conduct.

skiLLs, experience, expertise anD term of office of each Director

a profile of each director containing the applicable information is set out in the directors’ report.

STaTEmENT CONCErNiNg avaiLabiLiTy OF iNdEPENdENT PrOFESSiONaL adviCE
if a director considers it necessary to obtain independent professional advice to properly discharge the responsibility of his/
her office as a director then, provided the director first obtains approval for incurring such expense from the chairman, the 
Company will pay the reasonable expenses associated with obtaining such advice.

BaCK to ContentS

Carnarvon Petroleum limited 73

CorPorate GovernanCe Statement

ExPLaNaTiONS FOr dEParTurES FrOm bEST PraCTiCE rECOmmENdaTiONS
From 1 July 2010 to 30 June 2011 (the “reporting Period”) the Company complied with each of the essential Corporate 
Governance Principles (note 1 below) and the corresponding Best Practice recommendations (note 2 below) as published 
by the aSX Corporate Governance Council (“aSX Principles and recommendations”), other than in relation to the matters 
specified below: 

principle 
reference

recommendation 
reference

notification of  
Departure

explanation for  
Departure

2

2.4

a separate 
nomination 
Committee has  
not been formed.

the  Board  considers  that  the  Company  is  not  currently  of  a  size  to 
justify the formation of a nomination Committee. the Board as a whole 
undertakes the process of reviewing the skills base and experience of 
existing directors to enable identification or attributes required in new 
directors. Where appropriate independent consultants are engaged to 
identify possible new candidates for the Board.

Notes
(1)  a  copy  of  the  ten  essential  Corporate  Governance  Principles  is  set  out  on  the  Company’s  website  under  the  section 
entitled “Corporate Governance”. (2) a copy of the Best Practice recommendations is set out on the Company’s website 
under the section entitled “Corporate Governance”.

ExiSTENCE aNd TErmS OF aNy SChEmES FOr rETirEmENT bENEFiTS FOr NON-ExECuTivE dirECTOrS
the Company does not have any terms or schemes relating to retirement benefits for non-executive directors.

COmPaNy’S rEmuNEraTiON POLiCiES
the Company’s remuneration policies are set out in the remuneration report on pages 20 to 25.

the  Company  has  separate  remuneration  policies  for  executive  and  non-executive  directors.    non-executive  directors 
receive a fixed fee and, when appropriate, share options or participation in the employee Share Scheme. 

executive directors receive a salary or fee and, when appropriate, shares, share options, or participation in the employee 
Share Scheme.

maTEriaL buSiNESS riSkS
management has reported to the Board as to the effectiveness of the Company’s management of its material business risks.

PErFOrmaNCE EvaLuaTiON OF ThE bOard, iTS COmmiTTEES aNd SENiOr ExECuTivES
the Board reviews and evaluates the performance of the Board and its committees, which involves consideration of all the 
Board’s key areas of responsibility.

a performance evaluation of senior executives was undertaken during the year, in the case of the Chief executive by the 
Board, and in all other cases by the Chief executive officer and the Chairman.

idENTiFiCaTiON OF iNdEPENdENT dirECTOrS
the Company’s independent directors are considered to be Peter leonhardt, ted Jacobson, neil Fearis, and Bill Foster. 

neither of these directors was considered to have a material relationship with the Company or another group member during 
the reporting Period as professional advisor, consultant, supplier, customer, or through any other contractual relationship, 
nor did they have any business or other relationship which could, or could reasonably be perceived to, materially interfere 
with the director’s ability to act in the best interests of the Company. 

the Board considers “material” in this context to be where any director-related business relationship represents the lesser 
of at least 5% of the Company’s or the director-related business’s revenue.

NumbEr OF audiT COmmiTTEE mEETiNgS aNd NamES OF aTTENdEES
the number of audit Committee meetings and names of attendees is set out in the directors’ report.

NamES aNd quaLiFiCaTiONS OF audiT COmmiTTEE mEmbErS

the names and qualifications of audit Committee members are set out in the directors’ report.

74

2011 annual rePort

BaCK to ContentS

additional SHareHolder inFormation

additional information required by the aSX limited (“aSX”) listing rules and not disclosed elsewhere in this report is set 
out below.

a) 

SharEhOLdiNgS aS aT 30 auguST 2011
Substantial shareholders
there are no substantial shareholder notices lodged with the Company.

Voting Rights
the voting rights attaching to ordinary Shares are governed by the Constitution.  on a show of hands every person 
present who is a member or representative of a member shall have one vote and on a poll, every member present 
in person or by proxy or by attorney or duly authorised representative shall have one vote for each share held.  no 
options have any voting rights.

Twenty Largest Shareholders

name of shareholder

J P morgan nominees australia limited

HSBC Custody nominees (australia) limited

national nominees limited

mr edward Patrick Jacobson

Citicorp nominees Pty limited

Jacobson Geophysical Services Pty ltd

Pendomer investments Pty ltd

J P morgan nominees australia limited 

mr Peter James leonhardt

mr James mark dack

arne investments Pty ltd

mr edward Patrick Jacobson

Geolyn Pty ltd

mr Philip Paul Huizenga

arne investments Pty ltd

mr nigel roy Goldthorpe

Seawell Super Pty ltd

macquarie Bank limited

loong Phoong Pty ltd

mr William douglas Goodfellow

number of shares

% held

49,030,654

37,143,913

32,267,354

12,917,903

11,927,116

9,728,390

8,600,000

8,504,085

7,700,000

7,000,000

6,710,493

6,000,000

6,000,000

4,400,000

3,991,906

3,910,432

3,810,000

3,564,598

3,431,000

3,400,853

7.10

5.38

4.67

1.87

1.73

1.41

1.25

1.23

1.12

1.01

0.97

0.87

0.87

0.64

0.58

0.57

0.55

0.52

0.50

0.49

230,038,697

33.33

BaCK to ContentS

Carnarvon Petroleum limited 75

additional SHareHolder inFormation

a) 

SharEhOLdiNgS aS aT 30 auguST 2011 (CONTiNuEd)

Distribution of equity security holders

size of holding

1 
1,001
5,001
10,001
100,001

1,000
5,000
10,000
100,000

to
to
to
to
and over

number of
shareholders

number of
fully paid shares

551
2,246
1,998
4,677
792
10,264

308,791
7,121,900
16,956,622
167,651,397
498,281,924
690,320,634

the number of shareholders holding less than a marketable parcel of ordinary shares is 704. 

b) 

C) 

OPTiON hOLdiNgS aS aT 31 auguST 2011
there were no share options on issue. 

ON-markET buybaCk
there is no current on-market buyback.

d) 

SChEduLE OF PErmiTS 

Basin/country

Joint Venture partners

eQuity %

operator

permit

SW1a

l33/43

l44/43

Phetchabun / thailand

Phetchabun / thailand

Phetchabun / thailand

l20/50

Phitsanulok / thailand

l52/50, & l53/50

Surat-Khiensa / thailand

rangkas PSC

West Java / indonesia

Carnarvon 
Pan orient energy

Carnarvon 
Pan orient energy

Carnarvon 
Pan orient energy

Carnarvon
Sun resources
raisama

Carnarvon
Pearl oil

Carnarvon
lundin Petroleum
tap oil

eP321

eP407

Perth / australia

Carnarvon

Perth / australia

Carnarvon

Wa-399-P

Carnarvon / australia

Carnarvon
apache
rialto energy
Jacka

Wa-435-P, Wa-436-P, 
Wa-437-P, Wa-438-P

roebuck / australia

Carnarvon
Finder exploration

40%
60%

40%
60%

40%
60%

50%
42.5%
7.5%

50%
50%

25%
51%
24%

Pan orient energy

Pan orient energy

Pan orient energy

Carnarvon

Pearl oil

lundin Petroleum

2.5% of  
38.25%

2.5% of
42.5%

latent Petroleum

latent Petroleum

13%
60%
12%
15%

50%
50%

apache

Finder exploration

Wa-443-P

roebuck / australia

Carnarvon 

100%

Carnarvon

PeP38524

taranaki

Carnarvon
aWe
roC oil
Kea oil & Gas

10%
60%
20%
10%

aWe

76

2011 annual rePort

BaCK to ContentS

C
a
r
n
a
r
v
o
n
P
e
t
r
o
l
e
u
m
L
m

i

i
t
e
d

A
n
n
u
a
l

R
e
p
o
r
t
2
0
1
1

A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T
2
0
1
1

www.carnarvon.com.au

For the financial year ended June 30, 2011
ABN 60 002 688 851