2
0
0
6
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T
C
A
S
E
Y
’
S
G
E
N
E
R
A
L
S
T
O
R
E
S
,
I
N
C
.
annual report 2006
CASEY’S GENERAL STORES, INC.
CASEY’S GENERAL STORES, INC.
One Convenience Blvd.
Ankeny, Iowa 50021-9437
Mark of Distinction.
Casey’s Mark of Distinction brands our 1,394 corporate stores in
• Our newly expanded warehouse adds tremendous capacity
9 states and makes our Midwest dominance visible. The number
to our vertically integrated distribution system.
of stores we own is one source of distinction, but setting ourselves
• Seizing opportunities to make wise acquisitions is the key
apart from our peers also comes from having the best people,
source of our growth.
increasing our knowledge, and being proactive.
• An exceptionally strong balance sheet and adequate debt
capacity give us financial flexibility.
There are other marks as well:
• Analysts appreciate our quarterly reports on progress toward
• Our policy of rewarding employees for increasing gross profit
measurable annual goals and the monthly same-store sales
and controlling expenses attracts and retains quality people.
data we post on our Web site.
• Our business thrives on information from our full
point-of-sale technology.
Throughout this annual report, we’ll detail how we exceeded
• We are known for having one of the best proprietary
all of last year’s operations goals and how we’ll capitalize on our
prepared food programs in the industry.
marks of distinction to meet the goals we’ll challenge ourselves
• We use our size to gain advantage in wholesale markets.
with in fiscal 2007.
2005
2006
CHANGE
Total revenue
$ 2,804,658
$ 3,515,145
Cash flow from operations
Net earnings from
continuing operations
EPS from continuing operations
$
$
$
129,740
42,342
0.84
$
$
$
147,818
62,940
1.25
25.3%
13.9%
48.6%
48.8%
table of
CONTENTS
Message to Our Shareholders . . . . . 2
Management Team. . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Store Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Store Development . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Corporate Finance . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Board of Directors . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Investor Information . . . . . . . . . . 17
Financial Information . . . . . . . . . 18
251,3641,339 191,3941,413 361,3581,322 Total Franchise CorporateCASEY’S STORES$ 62.9$ 1.25$ 42.3$ 0.84$ 37.8$ 0.76 Net earnings from continuing operations (IN MILLIONS) EPS from continuing operationsCONTINUING OPERATIONS FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)2
message to our
SHAREHOLDERS
AT CASEY’S, WE BELIEVE OUR FREEDOM TO CHOOSE IS OUR MOST POWERFUL MARK OF DISTINCTION. THANKS TO THE INVESTMENTS WE’VE
MADE IN OUR FUTURE, WE HAVE MORE OPTIONS THAN EVER FOR BUILDING CAPACITY AND PURSUING PROFITABLE GROWTH. WE THINK WE CAN
SERVE YOU BEST BY MAKING CHOICES THAT BALANCE A DEEP RESPECT FOR OUR HISTORY WITH A BUSINESS-MINDED OPENNESS TO INNOVATION.
In the past several years, we have chosen to undertake transformational
Managing our gasoline business required steadiness in an extremely
initiatives that have benefited our customers and increased our
unstable environment. I have been with Casey’s since 1970, and I
overall impact within the convenience store industry. Selecting
cannot recall a more roller-coaster year. Our same-store gallons sold
the right people, the right strategies, and the right tools has made
were up 12.7% in August and off 1.5% in March; margins ranged from
Casey’s one of the top 10 convenience store chains in the nation.
14.1 cents per gallon in the second quarter to 9.2 cents in the third.
The choices we made during fiscal 2006 allowed us to exceed all of
When we averaged the ups and downs at fiscal year-end, annual
our operations goals and raise earnings per share from continuing
same-store gallons sold were up 4.4%—more than twice our 2%
operations to an all-time high of $1.25. We served over 325 million
goal—and the margin was above our 10.5-cent goal at 11.5 cents
customers in our 9-state region, raised sales 25.4% to $3.5 billion,
per gallon. We were opportunistic in terms of buying, refined our
and increased total gross profit 15.2% to $527 million, results that
efficient call and haul delivery system, and remained faithful to
won us increased visibility in the investment community.
our longstanding policy of pricing with the local competition.
3
Managing our gasoline business required
steadiness in an extremely unstable environment.
We have no reason to assume the gasoline business will be more stable in
fiscal 2007. We have good cause to think same-store sales will continue to
grow, but the gasoline margin will again be subject to market influences.
The gains we made in grocery & other merchandise are further
evidence of how well we are using our growing powers of choice.
In fiscal 2006, our lottery rollout increased store traffic as expected.
We employed our sophisticated data analysis capabilities, improved
inventory management, and enhanced distribution efficiencies to
make sure that more customers in our established stores translated
to a better bottom line for this business category. The result was a
5.7% increase in same-store sales with an average margin of 31.9%.
Our goal was a 3% increase with an average margin of 31.5%.
Prepared food & fountain again exceeded our high expectations. We
forged past our goal of increasing same-store sales 5.5% with an average
margin of 60.5% to achieve a 7.4% increase with a 63% margin. It was
our third straight year of same-store sales gains in excess of 5% and
margins above 60%.
4
MANAGEMENT TEAM (left to right)
Our proprietary prepared food program has earned its reputation
Ronald M. Lamb Chairman of the Board
Terry W. Handley Senior VP & COO
Julia L. Jackowski VP–Human Resources
Eli J. Wirtz VP–Corporate Counsel
Robert J. Myers President & CEO
as one of the best in the business. We made our latest gains by
refining what are now established strategies: matching menus to
customer preferences and traffic patterns, introducing profitable
new items, rotating offerings to maintain customer appeal, and
managing stales effectively. Near fiscal year-end we expanded our
fountain choices—another positive that should help keep our
Bradley G. Heyer VP–Information Systems
superior sales trend on the rise.
Darryl F. Bacon VP–Food Services
Cleo R. Kuhns VP–Real Estate-Store Development
Michael R. Richardson VP–Marketing
Sam J. Billmeyer Senior VP–Transportation & Support Operations
Hal D. Brown VP–Support Services
William J. Walljasper Senior VP & CFO
Russell D. Sukut VP–Treasurer
Robert C. Ford VP–Store Operations
John G. Harmon Senior VP & Secretary
We’ve raised the fiscal 2007 performance bar for our two inside sales
categories because recent initiatives have enhanced our control
over outcomes. Casey’s buying power is increasing our influence
with vendors, our capacity to process data and use the information
effectively in our decision-making is formidable, and our distribution
system will easily handle all the volume we can generate.
We intended to hold the percentage increase in operating expenses
to less than the percentage increase in gross profit, and we did
so. Operating expenses were up 10.6%, well below our 15.2%
improvement in gross profit. An increase in wages primarily
due to incentive compensation was a factor in the operating
expense percentage. That’s because we rightfully rewarded
those who delivered the year’s impressive results.
5
There will be new opportunities to increase gross profit as we
The entire management team is committed to meeting
add more stores. Our fiscal 2006 goal was to build 10 new stores
Casey’s fiscal 2007 performance goals:
and acquire 30 stores in addition to the 49 Gas ‘N Shop sites we
purchased in January. By April 30, we had built 15 stores and
• Increase same-store gasoline gallons sold 2% with an
acquired an additional 18.
average margin of 10.8 cents per gallon.
The Gas ‘N Shop acquisition was our first experience in purchasing
3.9% with an average margin of 32.2%.
and integrating a large chain into Casey’s systems. We see additional
• Increase same-store prepared food & fountain sales
acquisition possibilities to choose from in fiscal 2007. The pipeline
7.9% with an average margin of 63.4%.
is full, and our acquisition team is hard at work.
• Hold the percentage increase in operating expenses to
• Increase same-store grocery & other merchandise sales
less than the percentage increase in gross profit.
It has been my privilege to guide Casey’s senior management
• Acquire 50 stores and build 10 new stores.
through the transformation that made the past year’s achievements
possible, and, as Chairman, I will continue to be actively involved in
Making public a set of goals that requires us to outperform the
setting the strategic direction of the Company. The Chief Executive
record results of fiscal 2006 is our boldest Mark of Distinction.
Officer’s duties will be ably fulfilled by my successor Bob Myers,
who was elected to the position effective June 21, 2006.
The Board of Directors also approved four more significant
promotions: Terry Handley to Chief Operating Officer,
Ronald M. Lamb
Bill Walljasper to Senior Vice President–CFO, Sam Billmeyer
Chairman of the Board
to Senior Vice President–Transportation and Support Operations,
and Bob Ford to Vice President–Store Operations.
6
store
OPERATIONS
“LAST YEAR, I EMPHASIZED THE STEPS WE HAD TAKEN TO STRENGTHEN CASEY’S TECHNOLOGY, HUMAN RESOURCES, AND
INFRASTRUCTURE TO BUILD CAPACITY,” SAID NEWLY ELECTED CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER BOB MYERS.“I VIEW OUR FISCAL 2006 RESULTS
AS A MARK OF DISTINCTIONBECAUSE THEY SHOW WE KNOW HOW TO USE THAT CAPACITY TO DELIVER STRONG PERFORMANCE.”
Thanks to our technology initiatives, everyone at Casey’s has
Our reward system also takes into account controlling operating
better, more timely data on which to base operational decisions.
expenses. Holding our fiscal 2006 operating expense increase to
The human capacity we’ve gained by empowering our store
only 10.6% was particularly noteworthy considering that just one
managers with more information and greater responsibility
component—credit card fees—rose nearly 39% and cost us $27.4
makes every store more efficient and more customer-focused.
million. We can’t expect credit card charges to diminish as long as the
Our infrastructure improvements let us absorb additional
retail price of gasoline remains high, so containing transaction fees
Casey’s stores without putting stress on our systems.
will be a challenge for us and for the entire industry in fiscal 2007.
“Adding stores increases our purchasing power—the capacity to
“There will be other challenges as well, but we are in an excellent
buy more for less,” said Terry Handley, Chief Operating Officer.
position to address them,” said Myers. “In the rest of this section of
“Because of our size, we can negotiate with vendors for better prices,
the report, we’ll show you how we used our considerable resources
products, and service and can contract for millions of gallons of
to exceed our fiscal 2006 goals for each of Casey’s three business
gasoline at negotiated discounts. As we grow, we are able to create
categories: gasoline, groceries & other merchandise, and prepared
new efficiencies in store delivery and gasoline transport.”
food & fountain. More important, we’ll tell you how we plan to
improve on our 2006 performance in the new fiscal year.”
Be assured these advantages are being put to work because there
are strong incentives to do so. The financial rewards for everyone
GASOLINE
at Casey’s from store managers to executive officers remain aligned
with gross profit improvement. The alignment is one reason we
Casey’s customers purchased a total of 1.1 billion gallons of gasoline
followed an 8.8% gross profit increase in fiscal 2005 with a 15.2%
in fiscal 2006. Our 4.4% increase in same-store gallons sold was one
increase in fiscal 2006.
sure indicator that gasoline remains a powerful destination item.
7
“High retail prices in an unstable market did not seem to
Because we price with the competition, local market conditions have
alter people’s driving habits, and we benefited from record
a significant impact on margin at the point of sale. We can and do
volume. Total gallons sold were up 8.2%,” said Handley.
influence margin results by making the best buys available to us in
the wholesale market, transporting product as efficiently as possible,
Whatever the market environment, adherence to our long-time
and making sure every store has the gasoline it needs when it needs it.
practice of pricing with local competition is always a priority.
Our average margin of 11.5 cents per gallon in fiscal 2006 reflected the
Store managers know the best way to keep Casey’s customers
markets in which we were operating and the efficiencies we achieved.
loyal is to make sure they won’t find a better price a few blocks
or a few miles away.
A recent Forbes article featured Casey’s efficiencies, highlighting
our ability to haul nearly three-quarters of the gas we sell in our
Not only do customers fill their tanks at our stores, they come
own tankers and our state-of-the-art satellite system that transmits
inside to make additional purchases. Gasoline sales matter to our
fuel-level data from every store to our corporate headquarters.
business as much for the cross-selling opportunities they present
The system allows us to integrate gasoline purchasing, dispatch,
as for the revenue they generate.
and transportation.
$ 248.7$ 125.8$ 144.3$ 220.5$ 109.4$ 123.4 $ 207.3$ 99.1$ 110.4 Gasoline Grocery & other merchandise Prepared food & fountainGROSS PROFIT (IN MILLIONS) 2.0%10.8¢4.4%11.5¢1.9%10.8¢ 3.1%10.2¢ Same-store sales increase MarginGASOLINE $ 7791098 $ 229$ 7131015$ 204 $ 664972$ 182 Gasoline (gallons) Grocery & other merchandise Prepared food & fountainSALES (IN MILLIONS) 8
We’ll continue to improve our cigarette merchandising and
to take strategic price increases when the market allows them.
“Having continuous real-time data on fuel levels at each of our
sites means we can plan efficient transport routes for providing
just-in-time delivery,” said Sam Billmeyer, Senior Vice President–
Transportation and Support Operations. “In the year just ended,
we experienced inventory outages in only about 1% of stores
served by Casey’s tankers and saved approximately $360,000 in
freight costs because of our reduction in no-fits.”
In fiscal 2006, our gasoline gross profit rose 15% to $125.8 million.
We expect to make similar gains in fiscal 2007 by monitoring the
balance between gallons sold and margin in what may again be
an unstable market. You already know our goal is to increase
same-store gasoline gallons sold 2% with an average margin
of 10.8 cents per gallon.
GROCERY & OTHER MERCHANDISE
“We set separate goals for the two business categories that
comprise Casey’s inside sales, grocery & other merchandise and
prepared food & fountain,” Handley explained, “but we manage
the two categories in tandem because doing so is the best way
to improve gross profit.” Gross profit on total inside sales grew
14.3% to $393 million in fiscal 2006.
9
One way to build same-store inside sales is to increase store
matching product mix and customer demand. Increasing space
traffic. That’s why we added lottery ticket sales, a rollout that was
for low-price brands attracted customers who were switching
completed nearly a year ago. Our fiscal 2006 results tell us the
from the more expensive premium brands.
lottery is having the effects we expected—more people coming
through our doors and higher same-store sales.
We’ll continue to improve our cigarette merchandising and to
take strategic price increases when the market allows them. We
We added the lottery for its drawing power, but we also earn
believe diversifying our offerings and refining our strategies will
commissions from ticket sales that contribute to the Company’s
benefit gross profit. “We have absorbed approximately $7 million
total gross profit. These commissions are accounted for separately
in retail display allowance reductions over the past three years,”
and are not included in category results.
said Mike Richardson, Vice President–Marketing, “so I’m glad to
report we aren’t anticipating further reductions in fiscal 2007.”
“Investors have asked whether the lottery’s effect will remain visible
in future year-to-year comparisons,” Handley said. “There are no
Our destination items are bringing more people inside our stores,
guarantees, of course, but fiscal 2006 same-store sales were up
and our technology initiatives are helping us turn that traffic into
significantly in our Indiana stores, which have had the lottery for
sales and profit. Though it includes gasoline as well, the inventory
two years. We’re optimistic that stores in other states will report
turn rate is an important inside-sales measure. We view the rate’s
similar second-year trends.”
improvement to 34.8 in fiscal 2006 from 30.7 in fiscal 2005 as one
indicator of the benefits we’re gaining from point-of-sale data and
Cigarettes have been a traditional destination item for all
our hand-held bar code scanning units. With implementation now
convenience stores. Though unit volume was down 2% to 4%
complete, virtually all of our stores will have both technologies
nationwide, our fiscal 2006 unit sales showed we added market
through a full seasonal cycle, a positive that will contribute to
share. During the year, we began configuring rack space according
better results in fiscal 2007.
to plans individualized for each state, another step toward
10
Fiscal 2006 was a good year for the products we offer under the
Our new annual goal tells you we expect a strong performance
Casey’s logo—water, sports drinks, ice cream treats, auto products,
from this business category in fiscal 2007. We intend to increase
and more. Our branded grocery products along with Casey’s
same-store sales 3.9% and earn an average margin of 32.2%. We
MasterCard and telephone calling card promote our name
are confident that matching product mix to customer demand,
and provide savings to our customers.
refining inventory efficiencies, and paying close attention to
Sales up and down our aisles rose because of customer-conscious
pricing strategies and store sets designed to make it easy for
PREPARED FOOD & FOUNTAIN
customers to find what they want and to attract them to other
pricing will get us to our targets.
items we want to sell. We’re using our knowledge of local buying
Nothing does more to set Casey’s apart from its competitors than our
patterns and product preferences to build revenue and enhance
proprietary food program, and nothing performed better for us in
customer loyalty. Total category sales were up 9.4%, and our
fiscal 2006 than prepared food & fountain. Total sales rose 12% to
same-store sales increase was well above goal at 5.7%.
reach $229 million, same-store sales were up 7.4%, and our average
margin was 63%. Gross profit increased 16.9% to $144.3 million.
“Our focus on gross profit from inside sales means we make
merchandising decisions that affect both business categories,”
How did we achieve our success in fiscal 2006? We kept getting
Handley explained. “Sometimes it pays us to sacrifice potential
better at what we do well.
sales in one category to promote sales of higher-margin
products in the other.”
We sold nearly 9 million made-from-scratch pizzas, expanded
our to-go-cup offerings, and rotated established items to meet
In the second half of fiscal 2006, for instance, we improved gross
seasonal demands and keep customer interest high. People buy
profit on inside sales overall by giving up counter space for specialty
millions of fountain drinks at Casey’s, and we’re expecting our
merchandise so we could feature some of our more profitable
recent expansion of fountain offerings to increase sales and
prepared food items. Even so, we maintained an average margin
enhance customer satisfaction in the new year.
that exceeded the 31.5% goal by 40 basis points and contributed
to a 12.8% increase in gross profit to $248.7 million.
11
“Point-of-sale information is so important to our performance,”
“I said earlier that our size was making a difference,” Handley
said Daryl Bacon, Vice President–Food Services. “We receive
elaborated. “Our buying power makes it worthwhile to meet our
quick feedback on new products we introduce, we can see the
particular specifications. Some of our suppliers have actually
sales effect of any pricing changes, and we know what items are
bought the same ovens we have in our kitchens so they can
selling when and in what combination.”
test compliance.”
What POS tells us about sales is the basis for multiple management
We’re determined to be even better at running our proprietary
decisions. The information helps store managers set work schedules
food program tomorrow than we are today. We think our ongoing
to accommodate store traffic patterns. “To maintain the optimum
commitment to continuous improvement is a Mark of Distinction
balance between volume and stales, we need to know exactly how
that will drive us to achieve our 2007 performance goal: increase
to stock our kitchens,” said Bacon. “Too much of a certain product
same-store prepared food & fountain sales 7.9% with an average
leads to waste; too little means lost sales. We’ve reduced our stales
margin of 63.4%.
factor roughly 1% a year over the last three years as we’ve raised
sales an average of about 11%.”
In fiscal 2006, the amount of cheese we purchased increased from
about 8 million pounds the year before to closer to 10 million, so
what we paid for it was important. We took advantage of market
conditions to lock in an excellent price through August of 2007.
Maintaining efficiency and quality control was a priority
throughout the year. We don’t introduce new menu items that
fail to meet our taste tests or that cannot be prepared using our
existing equipment. The equipment standard helps us control
capital costs, makes training much easier, and streamlines the
introduction of new products.
Nothing does more to set Casey’s apart from
its competitors than our proprietary food program,
and nothing performed better for us in fiscal
2006 than prepared food & fountain.
3.9%32.2%5.7%31.9%4.8%30.9% 0.4%31.2% Increase in same-store sales MarginGROCERY & OTHER MERCHANDISE8663.4%7.4%63.0%8.4%60.4% 5.5%60.7% Increase in same-store sales MarginPREPARED FOOD & FOUNTAIN12
store
DEVELOPMENT
IN THE INTRODUCTION WE STATED THAT ANOTHER MARK OF DISTINCTION IS SEIZING OPPORTUNITIES TO MAKE WISE
ACQUISITIONS. CERTAINLY ACQUIRING 49 STORES FROM GAS ‘N SHOP INC. IN FISCAL 2006 WAS A SMART DECISION.
By year-end, we had closed 10 of those stores—only because they
Our goal for fiscal 2007 is to acquire 50 stores and to build 10.
were in direct competition with our stores in the same locations—and
“There are ample acquisition opportunities available as the industry
had rebranded the remaining 39 as Casey’s General Stores. We expect
continues to consolidate,” said Harmon. “We’re currently targeting
the acquired stores to be accretive within a year; their profitability
several chains in our 9-state territory and also looking at chains
will be enhanced by the construction of kitchens to support our
outside our marketing area. Any decisions will be driven by our
proprietary prepared food program.
business model of focusing on the small-town customer, potential
contribution to earnings, and estimated return on invested capital.”
Our goal for fiscal 2006 was to acquire 30 stores in addition to the
Gas ‘N Shop acquisition and to build 10 new stores. We actually
Whether we build or acquire, our critical mass and vertically
built 15 stores because there were good opportunities in areas
integrated distribution system are advantageous operationally.
where there weren’t attractive potential acquisitions. We acquired
Our vertical integration has three main aspects: We operate our
an additional 18 stores and at year-end had written agreements
own distribution center; less than 5% of the nation’s convenience
for 6 more stores.
store chains do. We run 141 grocery delivery routes every week;
our trucks arrive at the same store, on the same day, at the same
“More important than the number of stores we acquired was
time each week. We haul nearly 75% of the gasoline distributed
their quality,” said Senior Vice President John Harmon who leads
to our stores in our own tankers; our satellite communication
the acquisition team. “That’s why we were thorough in evaluating
network maximizes efficiency.
all aspects of the targeted sites. Our due diligence is rigorous,
and we’ve become increasingly proficient at multi-tasking.”
36
96
10
87
370
370
61
105
278
Total number of stores = 1,413
13
From our distribution center, we deliver 90% of the products we sell,
supply most of the paper and cleaning items we use, and provide
nearly all of our advertising signage. Economies of scale allow us
to lower unit costs by buying products in mass quantities. We offer
nearly 60% of our inventory in individual packages rather than by
the case. This option reduces carrying costs and outdated products
and lets store managers replenish stock with exactly what they need.
We can quantify our results. Over the last fiscal year, we saved
.3 cents per gallon when we delivered gasoline in Casey’s
transports, operated the distribution center for less than 2%
of sales, and averaged just over $3 million in sales per full-time
warehouse employee. The industry average for convenience
store suppliers was just under $1.5 million.
We added 100,000 square feet of warehouse space and 20,000
square feet of office space to our distribution center, giving us
the capacity to serve at least 1,000 more stores. The distinctive
addition is a visible mark of our commitment to continuing
growth and increasing the advantages of our vertical integration.
12295015671524 New store constructions AcquisitionsSTORE GROWTH14
corporate
FINANCE
Acquisitions & new store construction
Remodels & replacements
Technology
Transportation
Other
Total
$ 70,000,000
$ 28,000,000
$
$
5,500,000
4,500,000
$ 15,000,000
$ 123,000,000
AN EXCEPTIONALLY STRONG BALANCE SHEET AND ADEQUATE DEBT CAPACITY GIVE US FINANCIAL FLEXIBILITY, A VITAL MARK OF
DISTINCTION. AT APRIL 30, 2006, CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS CAME TO $75.4 MILLION, A 53.7% INCREASE FROM THE PREVIOUS
FISCAL YEAR-END. OUR LONG-TERM DEBT NET OF CURRENT MATURITIES DECREASED $16.6 MILLION TO $106.5 MILLION, AND
THE TOTAL DEBT TO TOTAL CAPITAL RATIO WAS 23.2% AT YEAR-END. SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY ROSE 11.5% TO $523.2 MILLION.
We increased our cash flow from operations 13.9% to $147.8 million.
What you as shareholders are most interested in is a good return
We used a little more than $100 million for capital expenditures.
on invested capital. Fiscal 2005’s ROIC was 8%—not as high
Some of that total, approximately $40 million, was spent on
as we wanted. Fiscal 2006’s ROIC was 10.6%, a healthy return
acquisitions. We built new stores for roughly $15 million. The
bolstered by improved store performance and profits from
distribution center addition cost us close to $10 million. Routine
acquisitions we made in fiscal 2005.
store maintenance, major remodels, and replacements accounted
for nearly $22 million. Infrastructure costs for transportation and
Growing profit is essential to improving the ROIC—so is
information systems came to about $15 million.
containing expenses. “You already know we met our goal of
holding the percentage increase in operating expenses to less than
The accompanying chart shows the capital expenditure budget
the percentage increase in gross profit,” Walljasper stated. “You
for fiscal 2007. “Note the amount we’ve earmarked for acquisitions,”
don’t know the specifics associated with two main components
said Chief Financial Officer Bill Walljasper. “Not only do we have the
of operating expenses: credit card fees and wages.”
ability to take advantage of acquisition opportunities, we also have
the appetite.” Included in the budget are the expenses associated
During the year, we experienced a 30% increase in credit card usage
with rebranding acquisitions, adding kitchens to the acquired
as customers charged more expensive gasoline; in turn, our fees
Gas ‘N Shop sites, and knocking down and rebuilding stores
went up 38.7%. Wages were up 8.4% for the best of reasons: bonuses
where necessary.
paid for increasing gross profit and controlling expenses.
FISCAL 2007 CAPITAL EXPENDITURE BUDGET15
In fiscal 2007, we’ll explore alternatives for containing transaction
fees. We intend to meet our goals, so operations personnel should
again earn bonuses—but the wage increase should be a favorable
comparison with the fiscal 2006 increase.
You’ll remember that in the third quarter of fiscal 2005 our operating
expenses were inflated because we identified 36 underperforming
stores as impaired assets. Later, we reclassified those stores as
discontinued operations and predicted that in fiscal 2006 we would
receive a $0.03 per share gain from eliminating the stores and some
relief operationally by not trying to change the stores’ performance.
We gained the $0.03 and benefited from the operational relief.
By December 31, 2006, we had sold 27 of the discontinued stores
and closed the remaining 9.
“Investor relations is always a priority,” Walljasper commented.
“We want people to understand our company and know our story.
Once they do, we believe they will appreciate our potential.”
In the coming year, you can count on us to publish quarterly
progress toward our annual goals and post monthly same-store
sales data for our three business categories. Throughout fiscal 2007,
we expect our reports to be Casey’s most telling Mark of Distinction.
$ 106.5$ 523.2$ 123.1$ 469.1$ 144.2$ 439.8 Long-term debt EquityCAPITAL STRUCTURE (IN MILLIONS) 15.2%10.6%8.8%7.6% 3.0%7.0% Gross profit increase Operating expense increaseOPERATING EXPENSES16
RonaldM. Lamb
Chairman
board of
DIRECTORS
(left to right)
Donald F. Lamberti Retired Chairman of Casey’s General Stores, Inc.
John G. Harmon Senior VP & Secretary
Kenneth H. Haynie Of counsel to the law firm of Ahlers & Cooney, P.C.
Johnny Danos* President of the Greater Des Moines Community Foundation
William C. Kimball* Retired Chairman and CEO of Medicap Pharmacy, Inc.
John R. Fitzgibbon* Self-employed Financial and Operational Consultant, Des Moines
Patricia Clare Sullivan* Retired CEO & President of Mercy Health Center, Central Iowa, Des Moines
Jack P. Taylor* Chairman & CEO of Taylor Construction Group, A General Contractor, Des Moines
*Member of the Audit Committee
17
COMMON STOCK
DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT AND STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
Casey’s General Stores, Inc. common stock trades on the Nasdaq
This plan, introduced in the fall of 1998, gives holders of Casey’s
National Market System under the symbol CASY. The 50.4 million
General Stores, Inc. common stock a convenient and economical
shares of common stock outstanding at April 30, 2006 had a
way of purchasing additional shares at market prices by reinvesting
market value of $1.1 billion. As of that same date, there were
their dividends in full or in part. Stockholders may also take
2,663 shareholders of record.
advantage of the cash payment option to purchase additional
shares. Those wishing to enroll should contact the transfer
COMMON STOCK MARKET PRICES
agent and registrar:
Calendar 2004
1st Quarter
2nd Quarter
3rd Quarter
4th Quarter
Calendar 2005
1st Quarter
2nd Quarter
3rd Quarter
4th Quarter
Calendar 2006
1st Quarter
2nd Quarter
High
$18.95
18.30
18.79
20.00
High
$19.67
20.86
23.25
26.09
High
$27.20
25.57
Low
Securities Transfer Division
$15.24
UMB Bank, n.a.
15.00
15.50
16.68
Low
$15.98
16.53
19.33
20.19
P.O. Box 410064
Kansas City, Missouri 64141
investor
INFORMATION
INVESTOR INQUIRIES
Current or prospective Casey’s General Stores, Inc. investors can
Low
receive annual reports, proxy statements, Forms 10-K and 10-Q,
$22.02
20.15
and earnings announcements at no cost by calling (515) 965-6107
or sending written requests to the following address:
On July 7, 2006 the last reported sales price of the Company's
Casey’s General Stores, Inc.
common stock was $25.00 per share. On that same date,
One Convenience Blvd.
the market cap was $1.3 billion.
Ankeny, Iowa 50021
DIVIDENDS
Corporate information, including monthly same-store sales data
for the Company’s three business categories, is also available at
The Company began paying cash dividends during fiscal 1991.
www.caseys.com. Quarterly conference calls are broadcast live over
The dividends paid in fiscal 2006 totaled $0.18 per share. At its
the Internet via the Investor Relations Web page and made available
June meeting, the Board of Directors increased the Company’s
in archived format. Broadcast times for the quarterly calls will be
quarterly dividend to $0.05 per share. The dividend is payable
announced on the Web page and in corresponding press releases.
on August 15, 2006 to shareholders of record on August 1, 2006.
ANNUAL MEETING
All shareholders and prospective investors are cordially invited to
attend the annual meeting at 9:00 a.m., September 15, 2006 at the
corporate headquarters in Ankeny, Iowa.
18
PART I
ITEM 1. Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
ITEM 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
ITEM 2. Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
PART II
ITEM 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder
Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk . . . . . . . . . . . 23
ITEM 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
ITEM 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants
on Accounting and Financial Disclosure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
ITEM 9A. Controls and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
ITEM 9B. Other Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
PART III
ITEM 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
ITEM 11. Executive Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
ITEM 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
and Management and Related Stockholder Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
ITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
ITEM 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
PART IV ITEM 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
form 10-K table of
CONTENTS
United States
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
Annual Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended April 30, 2006
Commission File Number 0-12788
CASEY’S GENERAL STORES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
IOWA
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
42-0935283
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
ONE CONVENIENCE BLVD., ANKENY, IOWA
(Address of principal executive offices)
50021
(Zip Code)
(515) 965-6100
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act
COMMON STOCK
(Title of Class)
COMMON SHARE PURCHASE RIGHTS
(Title of Class)
Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act
NONE
1
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes [ ] No [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be
contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or
any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated file, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. Large accelerated filer [X]
Accelerated filer [ ] Non-accelerated filer [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X]
The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on July 7, 2006, computed by reference to
the closing sales price ($21.57 per share) as quoted on the NASDAQ National Market System on the last business day of the registrant’s most recently
completed second fiscal quarter (October 31, 2005), was $968,282,045.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s class of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class
Outstanding at July 6, 2006
Common Stock, no par value per share
50,402,662 shares
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the following documents, as set forth herein, are incorporated by reference into the listed Parts and Items of this report on Form 10-K:
1.
Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to
be held on September 15, 2006 (Item 5 of Part II and Items 10, 11, 12, 13, and 15 of Part III).
2
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
The Company
PART I
Casey’s General Stores, Inc. (Casey’s) and its wholly owned subsidiaries (Casey’s, together with its subsidiaries, shall be referred to herein as the
Company) operate convenience stores under the name “Casey’s General Store” in 9 Midwest states, primarily Iowa, Missouri, and Illinois. The stores carry
a broad selection of food (including freshly prepared foods such as pizza, donuts, and sandwiches), beverages, tobacco products, health and beauty aids,
automotive products, and other nonfood items. In addition, all stores offer gasoline for sale on a self-service basis. On April 30, 2006, there were a total of
1,413 Casey’s General Stores in operation, of which 1,394 were operated by the Company (Corporate Stores) and 19 stores were operated by franchisees
(Franchise Stores). There were 15 Corporate Stores newly constructed and 55 acquired stores opened in fiscal 2006. There were no Franchise Stores newly
opened in fiscal 2006. The Company operates a central warehouse, the Casey’s Distribution Center, adjacent to its Corporate Headquarters facility in
Ankeny, Iowa, through which it supplies grocery and general merchandise items to Corporate and Franchise Stores.
Approximately 62% of all Casey’s General Stores are located in areas with populations of fewer than 5,000 persons, while approximately 12% of
all stores are located in communities with populations exceeding 20,000 persons. The Company competes on the basis of price as well as on the basis of
traditional features of convenience store operations such as location, extended hours, and quality of service.
Casey’s, with executive offices at One Convenience Blvd., Ankeny, Iowa 50021-8045 (telephone 515-965-6100) was incorporated in Iowa in 1967.
Two of the Company’s subsidiaries, Casey’s Marketing Company (Marketing Company) and Casey’s Services Company (Services Company), also operate
from the Corporate Headquarters facilities and were incorporated in Iowa in March 1995. A third subsidiary, Casey’s Retail Company, was incorporated in
Iowa in 2004, and also operates from these facilities.
The Company’s Internet address is www.caseys.com. The Company makes available through its Web site, among other items, the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports free of charge as soon as
reasonably practicable after the Company electronically files such material with, or furnishes it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. Additionally,
the Company discloses its Financial Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct on its Internet Web site and intends to use its Web site to disclose any waiver to
its Financial Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct to the extent such disclosure is legally required.
General
Casey’s General Stores seek to meet the needs of residents of small towns by combining features of both general store and convenience store
operations. Smaller communities often are not served by national-chain convenience stores. The Company has been successful in operating Casey’s
General Stores in small towns by offering, at competitive prices, a broader selection of products than does a typical convenience store.
In each of the past two fiscal years, the Company derived over 99% of its gross profits from retail sales by Corporate Stores. It also derived income from continuing
monthly royalties based on sales by Franchise Stores; wholesale sales to Franchise Stores; sign and façade rental fees; and the provision of certain maintenance,
transportation, and construction services to the Company’s franchisees. Sales at Casey’s General Stores historically have been strongest during the Company’s first
and second quarters and relatively weaker during its third and fourth quarters. In the warmer months of the year (which comprise the Company’s first two fiscal
quarters), customers tend to purchase greater quantities of gasoline and certain convenience items such as beer, soft drinks, and ice.
3
Corporate Subsidiaries
The Marketing Company and the Services Company were organized as Iowa corporations in March 1995, and both are wholly owned subsidiaries
of Casey’s. Casey’s Retail Company was organized as an Iowa Corporation in April 2004 and is also a wholly owned subsidiary of Casey’s.
Casey’s Retail Company operates Corporate Stores in Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Nebraska, and South Dakota and also holds the rights to the
Casey’s trademark and trade name and serves as franchisor in connection with the operation of Franchise Stores. The Marketing Company owns and has
responsibility for the operation of Corporate Stores in Iowa, Missouri, Wisconsin, and Indiana. The Marketing Company also has responsibility for all Company
wholesale operations, including the operation of the Casey’s Distribution Center. The Services Company provides a variety of construction and transportation
services for all Corporate Stores.
First Heartland Captive Insurance Company, Inc. (First Heartland) was incorporated in April 2004 in Arizona and is a wholly owned subsidiary of
Casey’s. First Heartland operates as a single-parent deductible reimbursement captive insurance company based in Phoenix, Arizona. First Heartland provides
general liability, automobile liability, and workers compensation insurance coverages to the Retail Company, the Marketing Company, and the Services Company.
Store Operations
Products Offered
Each Casey’s General Store typically carries approximately 1,800 food and nonfood items. The products offered are those normally found in a
supermarket, except that the stores do not sell produce or fresh meats, and selection is generally limited to one or two well-known brands of each item
stocked. Most staple foodstuffs carried are of nationally advertised brands. Stores sell regional brands of dairy and bakery products, and approximately
87% of the stores offer beer. The nonfood items carried include tobacco products, health and beauty aids, school supplies, housewares, pet supplies,
photo supplies, and automotive products.
All of the Casey’s General Stores offer gasoline or gasohol for sale on a self-service basis. The gasoline and gasohol offered by the stores generally
are sold under the Casey’s name, although some Franchise Stores sell gasoline under a major oil company brand name.
It is management’s policy to experiment with additions to the Company’s product line, especially products with higher gross profit margins. As a
result of this policy, the Company has added various prepared food items to its product line over the years, including the installation of snack centers, which
now are in most Corporate Stores. The snack centers sell sandwiches, fountain drinks, and other items that have gross profit margins higher than those of
general staple goods. As of April 30, 2006, the Company was selling donuts prepared on store premises in approximately 98% of its stores in addition to
cookies, brownies, Danish rolls, cinnamon rolls, and muffins. The Company installs donut-making facilities in all newly constructed stores.
The Company began marketing made-from-scratch pizza in 1984, expanding its availability to 1,310 Corporate Stores (94%) as of April 30, 2006.
Management believes pizza is the Company’s most popular prepared food product, although the Company continues to expand its prepared food product line,
which now includes ham and cheese sandwiches, pork and chicken fritters, sausage sandwiches, chicken tenders, popcorn chicken, sub sandwiches, pizza
bites, breakfast croissants and biscuits, breakfast pizza, hash browns, quarter-pound hamburgers and cheeseburgers, hot dogs, and potato cheese bites.
Management’s decision to add snack center items and freshly prepared donuts, pizza and other prepared food items to the Company’s product
selection reflects its strategy to promote high margin products that are compatible with convenience store operations. Although retail sales of nongasoline
items during the last three fiscal years have generated approximately 33% of the Company's retail sales, such sales resulted in approximately 76% of the
Company’s gross profits from retail sales. Gross profit margins for prepared food items, which have averaged approximately 61% during the last three fiscal
years, are significantly higher than the gross profit margin for retail sales of gasoline, which has averaged approximately 6% during the same period.
4
Store Design
Casey’s General Stores are freestanding and, with a few exceptions to accommodate local conditions, conform to standard construction specifications.
During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2006, the aggregate investment in land, building, equipment, and initial inventory for a typical newly constructed
Corporate Store averaged approximately $1.3 million. The standard building designed by the Company is a pre-engineered steel frame building mounted
on a concrete slab. The current store design measures 40 feet by 68 feet with approximately 1,300 square feet devoted to sales area, 500 square feet to
kitchen space, and 500 square feet to storage and 2 large public restrooms. Store lots have sufficient frontage and depth to permit adequate drive-in parking
facilities on one or more sides of each store. Each store typically includes 3 or 4 islands of gasoline dispensers and storage tanks having a capacity of
24,000 to 36,000 gallons of gasoline. The merchandising display in each store follows a standard layout designed to encourage a flow of customer traffic
through all sections of the store. All stores are air-conditioned and have modern refrigeration facilities. Nearly all the store locations feature the
Company's bright red and yellow pylon sign and façade, both of which display the name and service mark of the Company.
All Casey’s General Stores remain open at least sixteen hours per day, seven days a week. Most store locations are open from 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.,
although hours of operation may be adjusted on a store-by-store basis to accommodate customer traffic patterns. The Company requires that all stores
maintain a bright, clean interior and provide prompt checkout service. It is the Company's policy not to permit the installation of electronic games or sale
of adult magazines on store premises.
Store Locations
The Company traditionally has located its stores in small towns not served by national-chain convenience stores. Management believes that a
Casey’s General Store provides a service not otherwise available in small towns and that a convenience store in an area with limited population can be
profitable if it stresses sales volume and competitive prices. The Company’s store site selection criteria emphasize the population of the immediate area
and daily highway traffic volume. Management believes that, if there is no competing store, a Casey’s General Store may operate profitably at a highway
location in a community with a population of as few as 500.
5
Gasoline Operations
Gasoline sales are an important part of the Company’s revenue and earnings. Approximately 71% of Casey’s net sales for the year ended April 30, 2006
were derived from the retail sale of gasoline. The following table summarizes gasoline sales by Corporate Stores for the three fiscal years ended April 30, 2006:
Number of gallons sold
1,098,273,109
1,014,685,967
Year ended April 30,
2006
2005
2004
972,194,815
Total retail gasoline sales
2,489,280,382
1,866,729,486
1,452,542,505
Percentage of net sales
Gross profit percentage
Average retail price per gallon
70.8%
5.1%
$2.27
Average gross profit margin per gallon
11.45¢
66.6%
5.9%
$1.84
10.78¢
62.5%
6.8%
$1.49
10.20¢
Average number of gallons sold per
Corporate Store*
802,451
777,002
756,069
_____________________________
*Includes only those stores in operation at least one full year before commencement of the periods indicated.
Retail prices of gasoline increased during the year ended April 30, 2006. The total number of gallons sold by the Company during this period also
increased, primarily as the result of the increased number of Corporate Stores in operation and the Company’s efforts to price its retail gasoline competitively
in the market area served by a particular store. For additional information concerning the Company’s gasoline operations, see Item 7 herein.
Distribution and Wholesale Arrangements
The Marketing Company supplies all Corporate Stores and all Franchise Stores with groceries, food, health and beauty aids, and general
merchandise from the Casey’s Distribution Center. The stores place orders for merchandise through a telecommunications link-up to the computer at
the Company’s headquarters in Ankeny, and weekly shipments are made from the Casey’s Distribution Center by Company-owned delivery trucks. The
Marketing Company charges Franchise Stores processing and shipping fees for each order filled by the Casey’s Distribution Center. The efficient service
area of the Casey’s Distribution Center is a radius of approximately 500 miles, which encompasses all of the Company's existing and proposed stores.
6
The Marketing Company’s only wholesale sales are to Franchise Stores, to which it sells groceries; prepared sandwiches; ingredients and supplies
for donuts, sandwiches, and pizza; health and beauty aids; general merchandise; and gasoline. Although the Company derives income from this activity,
it makes such sales, particularly gasoline sales, at narrow profit margins to promote competitiveness and increase sales to Franchise Stores.
In fiscal 2006, the Company purchased directly from manufacturers approximately 90% of the food and nonfood items sold from the Casey’s
Distribution Center. It is the Company’s practice, with few exceptions, not to enter into contracts with any of the suppliers of products sold by Casey’s
General Stores. Management believes that the absence of such contracts is customary in the industry for purchasers such as the Company and enables
the Company to respond flexibly to changing market conditions.
Franchise Operations
Casey’s has franchised Casey’s General Stores since 1970. In addition to generating income for Casey's, franchising historically enabled Casey’s
to obtain desirable store locations from persons who have preferred to become franchisees rather than to sell or lease their locations to Casey’s. Franchising
also enabled Casey’s to expand its system of stores at a faster rate, thereby achieving operating efficiencies in its warehouse and distribution system as
well as greater identification in its market area. As the Company has grown and strengthened its financial resources, the advantages of franchising have
decreased in importance. In recent years management has acquired a number of Franchise Stores by leasing or purchasing such stores from the franchisees.
As of April 30, 2006, there were a total of 14 franchisees operating 19 Franchise Stores.
All franchisees currently pay Casey’s a royalty fee equal to 3% of gross receipts derived from total store sales excluding gasoline, subject to a
minimum monthly royalty of $300. Casey’s currently assesses a royalty fee of $0.018 per gallon on gasoline sales, although it has discretion to increase this
amount to 3% of retail gasoline sales. In addition, franchisees pay Casey's a sign and façade rental fee. The franchise agreements do not authorize Casey’s
to establish the prices to be charged by franchisees. Further, except with respect to certain supplies and items provided in connection with the opening of
each store, each franchisee has unlimited authority to purchase supplies and inventory from any supplier, provided the products meet the Company’s
quality standards. Franchise agreements typically contain a noncompetition clause that restricts the franchisee's ability to operate a convenience-style
store in a specified area for a period of two or three years following termination of the agreement.
Personnel
On April 30, 2006, the Company had 6,024 full-time employees and 9,668 part-time employees. The Company has not experienced any work
stoppages. There are no collective bargaining agreements between the Company and any of its employees.
Competition
The Company’s business is highly competitive. Food, including prepared foods, and nonfood items similar or identical to those sold by the
Company are generally available from various competitors in the communities served by Casey’s General Stores. Management believes its stores located
in small towns compete principally with other local grocery and convenience stores; similar retail outlets; and, to a lesser extent, prepared food outlets,
restaurants, and expanded gasoline stations offering a more limited selection of grocery and food items for sale. Stores located in more heavily populated
communities may compete with local and national grocery and drug store chains, expanded gasoline stations, supermarkets, discount food stores, and
traditional convenience stores. Convenience store chains competing in the larger towns served by Casey’s General Stores include 7-Eleven, Quik Trip,
Kwik Trip, and regional chains. Some of the Company’s competitors have greater financial and other resources than does the Company. These competitive
factors are discussed further in Item 7 of this Form 10-K.
7
Service Marks
The name “Casey’s General Store” and the service mark consisting of the Casey’s design logo (with the words “Casey’s General Store”) are
registered service marks of Casey’s under federal law. Management believes these service marks are of material importance in promoting and advertising
the Company’s business.
Government Regulation
The United States Environmental Protection Agency and several states, including Iowa, have established requirements for owners and operators
of underground gasoline storage tanks (USTs) with regard to (i) maintenance of leak detection, corrosion protection, and overfill/spill protection systems;
(ii) upgrade of existing tanks; (iii) actions required in the event of a detected leak; (iv) prevention of leakage through tank closings; and (v) required gasoline
inventory recordkeeping. Since 1984, new Corporate Stores have been equipped with noncorroding fiberglass USTs, including some with double-wall construction,
overfill protection, and electronic tank monitoring. The Company currently has 2,753 USTs, 2,473 of which are fiberglass and 280 are steel. Management
currently believes substantially all capital expenditures for electronic monitoring, cathodic protection, and overfill/spill protection to comply with the
existing UST regulations have been completed. Additional regulations or amendments to the existing UST regulations could result in future expenditures.
Several states in which the Company does business have trust fund programs with provisions for sharing or reimbursing corrective action or remediation
costs incurred by UST owners, including the Company. In each of the years ended April 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company spent approximately $1,519,000 and
$1,414,000 respectively, for assessments and remediation. Substantially all of these expenditures have been submitted for reimbursement from state-sponsored
trust fund programs. As of April 30, 2006, approximately $8,372,000 has been received from such programs since inception. Such amounts are typically subject
to statutory provisions requiring repayment of the reimbursed funds for noncompliance with upgrade provisions or other applicable laws. At April 30, 2006, the
Company had an accrued liability of approximately $200,000 for estimated expenses related to anticipated corrective actions or remediation efforts, including
relevant legal and consulting costs. Management believes the Company has no material joint and several environmental liability with other parties.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider the risks described in this report before making a decision to invest in our securities. The risks and uncertainties
described are not the only ones facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial could negatively
impact our results of operations or financial condition in the future. If any of such risks actually occur, our business, financial condition, and/or results of operations
could be materially adversely affected. In that case, the trading price of our securities could decline and you might lose all or part of your investment.
The convenience store industry is highly competitive.
Risks Related to Our Industry
The industry and geographic areas in which we operate are highly competitive and marked by ease of entry and constant change in the number
and type of retailers offering the products and services found in our stores. We compete with other convenience store chains, gasoline stations, supermarkets,
drugstores, discount stores, club stores, and mass merchants. In recent years, several nontraditional retailers, such as supermarkets, club stores, and
mass merchants have impacted the convenience store industry by entering the gasoline retail business. These nontraditional gasoline retailers have
obtained a significant share of the motor fuels market, and their market share is expected to grow. In some of our markets, our competitors have been in
existence longer and have greater financial, marketing, and other resources than we do. As a result, our competitors may be able to respond better to changes
in the economy and new opportunities within the industry. To remain competitive, we must constantly analyze consumer preferences and competitors’
8
offerings and prices to ensure we offer convenience products and services consumers demand at competitive prices. We must also maintain and upgrade our
customer service levels, facilities, and locations to remain competitive and attract customer traffic. Major competitive factors include, among others, location,
ease of access, gasoline brands, pricing, product and service selections, customer service, store appearance, cleanliness, and safety.
The volatility of wholesale petroleum costs could adversely affect our operating results.
Over the past three fiscal years, our gasoline revenue accounted for approximately 67% of total revenues and our gasoline gross profit accounted for
approximately 24% of total gross profit. Crude oil and domestic wholesale petroleum markets are marked by significant volatility. General political conditions,
acts of war or terrorism, and instability in oil producing regions, particularly in the Middle East and South America, could significantly affect crude oil supplies
and wholesale petroleum costs. In addition, the supply of gasoline and our wholesale purchase costs could be adversely affected in the event of shortage, which
could result from, among other things, lack of capacity at United States oil refineries or the absence of gasoline contracts that guarantee an uninterrupted,
unlimited supply of gasoline. Significant increases and volatility in wholesale petroleum costs could result in significant increases in the retail price of petroleum
products and in lower gasoline average margin per gallon. Increases in the retail price of petroleum products could adversely affect consumer demand for
gasoline. Volatility makes it difficult to predict the impact that future wholesale cost fluctuations will have on our operating results and financial condition.
These factors could adversely affect our gasoline gallon volume, gasoline gross profit, and overall customer traffic, which in turn would impact our sales of
grocery and general merchandise and prepared food products.
Wholesale cost increases of tobacco products could impact our operating results.
Sales of tobacco products have averaged approximately 10% of our total revenue over the past three fiscal years, and our tobacco gross profit
accounted for approximately 12.8% of total gross profit for the same period. Significant increases in wholesale cigarette costs, tax increases on tobacco products,
and national and local campaigns to discourage smoking in the United States may have an adverse effect on unit demand for cigarettes domestically. In
general, we attempt to pass price increases on to our customers. Due to competitive pressures in our markets, however, we may not always be able to do so.
These factors could adversely affect our retail price of cigarettes, cigarette unit volume and revenues, merchandise gross profit, and overall customer traffic.
Unfavorable weather conditions could adversely affect our business.
Risks Related to Our Business
All of our stores are located in the Midwest region of the United States, which is susceptible to thunderstorms, extended periods of rain, ice
storms, and heavy snow. Inclement weather conditions could damage our facilities or could have a significant impact on consumer behavior, travel, and
convenience store traffic patterns as well as our ability to operate our locations. In addition, we typically generate higher revenues and gross margins
during warmer weather months, which fall within our first and second fiscal quarters. If weather conditions are not favorable during these periods, our
operating results and cash flow from operations could be adversely affected.
We may not be able to identify, acquire, and integrate new stores, which could adversely affect our ability to grow our business.
An important part of our recent growth strategy has been to acquire other convenience stores that complement our existing stores or broaden our geographic
presence. From May 1, 2005 through April 30, 2006 we acquired 67 convenience stores. The transactions included the acquisition of 49 stores in Nebraska,
Kansas, and Iowa from Gas ‘N Shop, Inc. We closed 10 of the Gas ‘N Shop stores because they were in direct competition with existing Casey’s stores in
the same market areas. We expect to continue pursuing acquisition opportunities as an element of our growth strategy.
9
Acquisitions involve risks that could cause our actual growth or operating results to differ materially from our expectations or the expectations
of securities analysts:
•
•
•
We may not be able to identify suitable acquisition candidates or acquire additional convenience stores on favorable terms. We compete with
others to acquire convenience stores. We believe this competition may increase and could result in decreased availability or increased
prices for suitable acquisition candidates. It may be difficult to anticipate the timing and availability of acquisition candidates.
During the acquisition process we may fail or be unable to discover some of the liabilities of companies or businesses we acquire.
These liabilities may result from a prior owner's noncompliance with applicable federal, state, or local laws.
Acquired convenience stores may not perform as we expect or we may not be able to obtain the cost savings and financial improvements we anticipate.
We are subject to state and federal environmental and other regulations.
Our business is subject to extensive governmental laws and regulations including but not limited to environmental regulations, employment
laws and regulations, regulations governing the sale of alcohol, tobacco, and lottery products, minimum wage requirements, working-condition require-
ments, public accessibility requirements, citizenship requirements, and other laws and regulations. A violation or change of these laws could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Under various federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and ordinances, we may, as the owner/operator of our locations, be liable for the
costs of removal or remediation of contamination at these or our former locations, whether or not we knew of, or were responsible for, the presence of such
contamination. The failure to properly remediate such contamination may subject us to liability to third parties and may adversely affect our ability to
sell or lease such property.
Compliance with existing and future environmental laws regulating underground storage tanks may require significant capital expenditures and
increased operating and maintenance costs. The remediation costs and other costs required to clean up or treat contaminated sites could be substantial.
We pay tank registration fees and other taxes to state trust funds established in our operating areas in support of future remediation obligations.
These state trust funds are expected to pay or reimburse us for remediation expenses less a deductible. To the extent third parties do not pay
for remediation as we anticipate, we will be obligated to make these payments, which could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results
of operations. Reimbursements from state trust funds will be dependent on the maintenance and continued solvency of the various funds.
In the future, we may incur substantial expenditures for remediation of contamination that has yet to be discovered at existing locations or
at locations we may acquire. We cannot assure you that we have identified all environmental liabilities at all of our current and former locations; that
material environmental conditions not known to us do not exist; that future laws, regulations, or ordinances will not impose material environmental liability
on us; or that a material environmental condition does not otherwise exist at any one or more of our locations. In addition, failure to comply with any
environmental laws, regulations, or ordinances or an increase in regulations could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
State laws regulate the sale of alcohol, tobacco, and lottery products. A violation or change of these laws could adversely affect our business,
financial condition, and results of operations because state and local regulatory agencies have the power to approve, revoke, suspend, or deny applications
for and renewals of permits and licenses relating to the sale of these products or to seek other remedies.
10
Any appreciable increase in income, overtime pay, or the statutory minimum wage rate, or adoption of mandated healthcare benefits would
result in an increase in our labor costs. Such cost increase or the penalties for failing to comply with such statutory minimum could adversely affect our
business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Any issuance of shares of our common stock in the future could have a dilutive effect on your investment.
Other Risks
We could issue additional shares for investment, acquisition, or other business purposes. Even if there is not an immediate need for capital, we may
choose to issue securities to sell in public or private equity markets if and when conditions are favorable. Raising funds by issuing securities would dilute the
ownership interests of our existing stockholders. Additionally, certain types of equity securities we may issue in the future could have rights, preferences, or
privileges senior to the rights of existing holders of our common stock.
The market price for our common stock has been and may in the future be volatile, which could cause the value of your investment to decline.
Securities markets worldwide experience significant price and volume fluctuations. This market volatility could significantly affect the market
price of our common stock without regard to our operating performance. In addition, the price of our common stock could be subject to wide fluctuations
in response to these and other factors:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
A deviation in our results from the expectations of public market analysts and investors.
Statements by research analysts about our common stock, company, or industry.
Changes in market valuations of companies in our industry and market evaluations of our industry generally.
Additions or departures of key personnel.
Actions taken by our competitors.
Sales of common stock by the Company, senior officers, or other affiliates.
Other general economic, political, or market conditions, many of which are beyond our control.
The market price of our common stock will also be affected by our quarterly operating results and quarterly comparable store sales growth, which
may be expected to fluctuate from quarter to quarter. The following are factors that may affect our quarterly results and comparable store sales: general,
regional, and national economic conditions; competition; unexpected costs; changes in pricing, consumer trends, and the number of stores we open
and/or close during any given period; costs of compliance with corporate governance, and Sarbanes-Oxley requirements. Other factors are discussed
throughout Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. You may not be able to resell your shares of our
common stock at or above the price you pay.
11
Our charter documents include provisions that may have the effect of preventing or hindering a change in control and adversely affecting the market
price of our common stock.
Our articles of incorporation give our board of directors the authority to issue up to 1 million shares of preferred stock and to determine the
rights and preferences of the preferred stock without obtaining stockholder approval. The existence of this preferred stock could make it more difficult or
discourage an attempt to obtain control of the Company by means of a tender offer, merger, proxy contest, or otherwise. Furthermore, this preferred
stock could be issued with other rights, including economic rights, senior to our common stock, thereby having a potentially adverse effect on the market
price of our common stock. At present, we have no plans to issue any preferred stock.
Other provisions of our articles of incorporation and bylaws and of Iowa law could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us or hinder
a change in management, even if doing so would be beneficial to our stockholders. For example, Section 409.1110 of the Iowa Business Corporation Act
prohibits publicly held Iowa corporations to which it applies from engaging in a “business combination” with an “interested stockholder” for a period of
three years after the date of the transaction in which the person became an interested stockholder, unless the business combination is approved in a prescribed
manner. This provision could discourage others from bidding for our shares and could, as a result, reduce the likelihood of an increase in our stock price
that would otherwise occur if a bidder sought to buy our stock.
These governance provisions could affect the market price of our common stock. We may, in the future, adopt other measures that could have
the effect of delaying, deferring, or preventing an unsolicited takeover, even if such a change in control were at a premium price or favored by a majority
of unaffiliated stockholders. These measures may be adopted without any further vote or action by our stockholders.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Not applicable.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Company owns its Corporate Headquarters and Distribution Center operations on a 45-acre site in Ankeny, Iowa. This facility consists of
approximately 375,000 square feet, including a central Corporate Headquarters office building, Distribution Center, and vehicle service and maintenance
center. The facility was completed in February 1990 and placed in full service at that time. The Company recently completed construction of improvements
to this facility, including the addition of 98,000 square feet to the Distribution Center, 20,000 square feet of office space, additional paving for truck parking
and necessary drainage and landscaping improvements.
On April 30, 2006, Casey’s owned the land at 1,317 locations and the buildings at 1,329 locations and leased the land at 77 locations and the
buildings at 65 locations. Most of the leases provide for the payment of a fixed rent plus property taxes and insurance and maintenance costs. Generally,
the leases are for terms of ten to twenty years with options to renew for additional periods or options to purchase the leased premises at the end of the
lease period.
12
ITEM 3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company from time to time is involved in legal and administrative proceedings or investigations arising from the conduct of its business
operations, including contractual disputes, environmental contamination or remediation issues, employment or personnel matters, personal injury and
property damage claims and claims by federal, state, and local regulatory authorities relating to the sale of products pursuant to licenses and permits
issued by those authorities. Claims for compensatory or exemplary damages in those actions may be substantial. While the outcome of such litigation,
proceedings, investigations, or claims is never certain, it is the opinion of management, after taking into consideration legal counsel’s assessment and the
availability of insurance proceeds and other collateral sources to cover potential losses, that the ultimate disposition of such matters currently pending or
threatened, individually or cumulatively, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operation.
ITEM 4.
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Not applicable.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Common Stock
Casey’s common stock trades on the Nasdaq National Market System under the symbol CASY. The 50,368,662 shares of common stock outstanding
at April 30, 2006 had a market value of $1.1 billion, and there were 2,663 shareholders of record.
Common Stock Market Prices
Calendar
Calendar
Calendar
2004
High
Low
2005
High
Low
2006
High
Low
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$ 18.95
$ 15.24
18.30
18.79
20.00
15.00
15.50
16.68
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$ 19.67
$ 15.98
20.86
23.25
26.09
16.53
19.33
20.19
Q1
Q2
$ 27.20
$ 22.02
25.57
20.15
13
Dividends
The Company began paying cash dividends during fiscal 1991.The dividends paid in fiscal 2006 totaled $0.18 per share. The dividends paid in
fiscal 2005 totaled $0.195 per share, which included a dividend of $0.035 declared in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004 and paid in fiscal 2005. Historically,
the Company recorded dividends at the time of payment, which typically followed by several weeks the date on which dividends were declared. On
May 1, 2004, the Company began recording dividends as of the date of declaration. As a result, the Company’s records show two quarterly dividends paid
in the first quarter of fiscal 2005, the first of which ($0.035) was for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004 and the second of which ($0.04) was for the first quarter of
fiscal 2005. The Board of Directors recently declared a quarterly dividend of $0.05, payable August 15, 2006 to shareholders of record on August 1, 2006.
The Board expects to review the dividend every year at its June meeting.
The cash dividends declared by the Company during the calendar years 2004-06 have been as follows:
Calendar
Cash dividend
Calendar
Cash dividend
Calendar
Cash dividend
2004
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
declared
$ 0.035
0.04
0.04
0.04
$ 0.155
2005
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
declared
$ 0.04
0.045
0.045
0.045
$ 0.175
2006
Q1
Q2
declared
$ 0.045
0.05
14
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Statement of Income Data
Net sales
Franchise revenue
Cost of goods sold
Operating expenses
Depreciation and amortization
Interest, net
Earnings from continuing operations
before income taxes
Federal and state income taxes
Net earnings from continuing operations
Loss on discontinued operations,
net of tax benefit
Cumulative effect of accounting change,
net of tax benefit
Net earnings
Basic
Earnings from continuing operations
Loss on discontinued operations
Cumulative effect of accounting change,
net of tax benefit
Net earnings
Diluted
Earnings from continuing operations
Loss on discontinued operations
Cumulative effect of accounting change,
net of tax benefit
Net earnings
Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding—basic
Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding—diluted
Years ended April 30,
2006
2005
2004
$ 3,514,464
$ 2,803,593
$ 2,323,762
681
3,515,145
2,987,505
363,443
57,185
8,896
98,116
35,176
62,940
1,389
1,083
1,065
2,804,658
2,346,295
328,472
51,979
10,739
67,173
24,831
42,342
5,589
1,669
2,325,431
1,903,466
305,306
48,213
12,398
56,048
18,203
37,845
1,379
--------
--------
$
60,468
$
36,753
$
36,466
$
$
$
$
1.25
.03
.02
1.20
1.24
.03
.02
1.19
50,310
50,610
$
$
$
$
.84
.11
--------
.73
.84
.11
--------
.73
50,115
50,284
$
$
$
$
.76
.03
--------
.73
.76
.03
--------
.73
49,876
50,041
Dividends paid per common share
$
0.18
$
0.195
$
0.13
Balance Sheet Data
Current assets
Total assets
Current liabilities
Long-term debt
Shareholders’ equity
Years ended April 30,
2006
2005
2004
$
191,406
$
142,430
$
146,807
987,539
243,696
106,512
523,190
870,909
170,127
123,064
469,137
834,586
145,840
144,158
439,794
15
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands)
The following discussion of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the selected
historical consolidated financial data and consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
Overview
The Company derives its revenue from retail sales of food (including freshly prepared foods such as pizza, doughnuts, and sandwiches),
beverages, and nonfood products (including health and beauty aids, tobacco products, automotive products, and gasoline) by Corporate Stores and
wholesale sales of certain merchandise and gasoline to Franchise Stores. The Company generates relatively minor revenues from continuing monthly
royalties based on sales by Franchise Stores; sign and façade rental fees; and the provision of certain maintenance, transportation, and construction
services to the Company’s franchisees. A typical store generally is not profitable for its first year of operation due to start-up costs and usually will attain
representative levels of sales and profits during its third or fourth year of operation.
Casey’s measures performance using trend analysis and same-store comparisons on net sales and gross profit, with a focus on the following
three categories of products sold by Corporate Stores: gasoline, grocery & other merchandise, and prepared food & fountain. Comparisons are also made
on operating expenses. Fluctuations in operating expenses are compared with the increase or decrease in gross profit. Wages are the primary component
of operating expenses, and management believes that the Company has appropriately aligned store manager compensation with store performance.
Store growth is a priority of the Company. Casey’s evaluates the location of third-party purchases and sites for new construction based on
expected financial results and return on investment. Casey’s purchased 55 stores and built 15 in fiscal 2006.
Fiscal 2006 Compared with Fiscal 2005
Net sales for fiscal 2006 increased 25.4% to $3,514,464, primarily due to a 23.2% increase in gas prices and the net addition of 55 Corporate
Stores. Retail gasoline sales for the fiscal year were $2,489,280, an increase of 33.3%, and gallons sold increased 8.2% to 1,098,273. Inside sales (grocery
& other merchandise and prepared food & fountain) increased 9.9% to $1,008,260.
Cost of goods sold as a percentage of net sales was 85% for fiscal 2006 compared with 83.7% for the prior year. The increase was caused by a
decrease in the gas margin to 5.1% in fiscal 2006 from 5.9% in fiscal 2005 due to the higher cost of gasoline. The grocery & other merchandise margin
increased to 31.9% in fiscal 2006 from 30.9% in fiscal 2005 due to the enhancing of the point-of-sale technology. The prepared food & fountain margin
increased to 63% from 60.4%, primarily due to the relatively low cost of cheese during much of the year and the addition of profitable new products.
Operating expenses increased 10.6% in fiscal 2006, driven by an increase in bank fees resulting from customers’ greater use of credit cards
and higher retail gasoline prices and an increase in the number of Corporate Stores. Higher gasoline prices decreased the operating expense ratio to
10.3% of net sales in fiscal 2006 from 11.7% in the prior year.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased 10% to $57,185 in fiscal 2006 from $51,979 in fiscal 2005. The increase was due to capital
expenditures made in fiscal 2006.
16
The effective tax rate decreased 1.1% to 35.9% in fiscal 2006 from 37.0% in fiscal 2005. The decrease in the effective tax rate is primarily the
result of the valuation of deferred tax assets relating to state income tax depreciation and utilizable net operating losses, which exceeded an increase in
the tax contingency reserve.
Net earnings from continuing operations increased to $62,940 in fiscal 2006 from $42,342 in fiscal 2005. The increase was due primarily to the
increase in the average margin per gallon of gasoline sold (to 11.45¢) from the prior year (10.78¢) and the increase in average margin on both prepared
food & fountain and grocery & other merchandise sales.
Discontinued operations for fiscal 2006 resulted in a loss of $1,389 (net of $888 income tax benefit) compared with a loss of $5,589 (net of
$3,574 income tax benefit) for fiscal 2005. The stores included in discontinued operations had total revenues of $15,534 and $47,644 and pretax operating
losses of $715 and $2,333 for fiscal 2006 and 2005, respectively. Included in the loss on discontinued operations were losses on disposal of $1,562 (net of
$609 tax benefit) for the year ended April 30, 2006 and $6,830 (net of $2,664 tax benefit) for the year ended April 30, 2005. The losses on disposal for the
years ended April 30, 2006 and 2005 included write-downs of stores to net realizable value as well as gains and losses on sales of stores.
Fiscal 2005 Compared with Fiscal 2004
Net sales for fiscal 2005 increased 20.6% to $2,803,593, primarily due to a 23.1% increase in gas prices and the net addition of 17 Corporate
Stores. Retail gasoline sales for the fiscal year were $1,866,729, an increase of 28.5%, and gallons sold increased 4.4% to 1,014,686. Inside sales (grocery
& other merchandise and prepared food & fountain) increased 8.4% to $917,049.
Cost of goods sold as a percentage of net sales was 83.7% for fiscal 2005 compared with 81.9% for the prior year. The increase was caused by a
decrease in the gas margin to 5.9% in fiscal 2005 from 6.8% in fiscal 2004 due to the higher cost of gasoline. The grocery and other merchandise margin
decreased slightly to 30.9% in fiscal 2005 from 31.2% while the prepared food & fountain margin decreased to 60.4% from 60.7%, primarily due to the high
cost of cheese during much of the year.
Operating expenses increased 7.6% in fiscal 2005, driven by an increase in bank fees resulting from customers’ greater use of credit cards and
higher retail gasoline prices, and an increase in the number of Corporate Stores. Higher gasoline prices decreased the operating expense ratio to 11.7%
of net sales in fiscal 2005 from 13.1% in the prior year.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased 7.8% to $51,979 in fiscal 2005 from $48,213 in fiscal 2004. The increase was due to capital
expenditures made in fiscal 2005.
The effective tax rate increased 4.5% to 37.0% in 2005 from 32.5% in 2004. The provision for income taxes for fiscal 2004 included one-time tax
benefits of approximately $2,500. Included in the one-time benefits were approximately $200 of legislative tax changes, $1,100 in adjustment of prior estimated
federal and state credits to actual, $500 of available credits and state tax benefits previously not taken, and $700 due to the resolution of tax exposure items.
Net earnings from continuing operations increased to $42,342 in fiscal 2005 from $37,845 in fiscal 2004. The increase was due primarily to the
increase in the gross profit margin per gallon of gasoline sold (to 10.78¢) from the prior year (10.2¢).
Discontinued operations for fiscal 2005 resulted in a loss of $5,589 (net of $3,574 income tax benefit) compared to a loss of $1,379 (net of $881
income tax benefit) for fiscal 2004. The stores included in discontinued operations had total revenues of $47,644 and $45,158 and pretax operating losses
of $2,333 and $2,260 for fiscal 2005 and 2004, respectively. Included in the loss on discontinued operations were losses on disposal of $6,830 (net of
$2,664 tax benefit) for the year ended April 30, 2005. No losses were recorded on disposal for the year ended April 30, 2004. The losses on disposal for
the year ended April 30, 2005 included write-downs of stores to net realizable value as well as gains and losses on sales of stores.
17
COMPANY NET SALES AND GROSS PROFITS
Net sales (1)
Gasoline
Grocery & other merchandise
Prepared food & fountain
Other
Gross profits (2)
Gasoline
Grocery & other merchandise
Prepared food & fountain
Other
SAME-STORE COMPARISONS (3)
Corporate Stores
Average retail sales
Average retail inside sales
Average gross profit on inside items
Average retail sales of gasoline
Average gross profit on gasoline (4)
Average operating income (5)
Average number of gallons sold
Franchise Stores
Average franchise revenue (6)
Years ended April 30,
2006
2005
2004
$ 2,489,280
$ 1,866,729 $ 1,452,543
779,253
229,007
16,924
712,570
204,479
19,815
664,426
181,674
25,119
$ 3,514,464
$ 2,803,593
$ 2,323,762
$
125,797
$
109,351
$
99,144
248,726
144,312
8,124
220,521
123,410
4,016
207,329
110,353
3,470
$
526,959
$
457,298
$
420,296
Years ended April 30,
2006
2005
2004
$
2,555
$
2,134
$
1,811
738
281
1,817
90
105
802
702
259
1,431
83
91
778
667
248
1,144
76
85
766
$
36
$
35
$
34
(1) Net sales exclude franchise revenue and charges to franchisees for certain maintenance, transportation, and construction services
provided by the Company.
(2) Gross profits represent net sales less cost of goods sold. Gross profit is given before charge for depreciation and amortization.
(3) Same-store comparisons include only those stores that had been in operation for at least one full year on April 30 of the fiscal year indicated.
(4) Retail gasoline profit margins have a substantial impact on the Company’s net income. Profit margins on gasoline sales can be adversely
affected by factors beyond the control of the Company, including oversupply in the retail gasoline market, uncertainty or volatility in the
wholesale gasoline market, and price competition from other gasoline marketers. Any substantial decrease in profit margins on retail gasoline
sales or the number of gallons sold could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s earnings.
(5) Average operating income represents retail sales less cost of goods sold, including cost of merchandise, financing costs, and operating expenses
attributable to a particular store; it excludes federal and state income taxes, operating expenses of the Company not attributable to a particular
store, and payments by the Company to its benefit plans.
(6) Average franchise revenue includes a royalty fee equal to 3% of gross receipts derived from store sales of nongasoline items, a royalty fee of
$0.018 per gallon on gasoline sales, and sign and façade rental fees.
18
Critical Accounting Policies
Critical accounting policies are those accounting policies that management believes are important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial
condition and results of operations and require management’s most difficult, subjective judgments, often because of the need to estimate the effects of
inherently uncertain factors.
Inventory
Inventories, which consist of merchandise and gasoline, are stated at the lower of cost or market. For gasoline, cost is determined through the use
of the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. For merchandise inventories, cost is determined through the use of the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method applied to
inventory values determined primarily by the FIFO method for warehouse inventories and the retail inventory method (RIM) for store inventories, except
for cigarettes, beer, pop, and prepared foods, which are valued at cost. RIM is an averaging method widely used in the retail industry because of its practicality.
Under RIM, inventory valuations are at cost and the resulting gross margins are calculated by applying a cost-to-retail ratio to sales. Inherent in the
RIM calculations are certain management judgments and estimates that could affect the ending inventory valuation at cost and the resulting gross margins.
Vendor allowances include rebates and other funds received from vendors to promote their products. The Company often receives such allowances on
the basis of quantitative contract terms that vary by product and vendor or directly on the basis of purchases made. Rebates are recognized as reductions of
inventory costs when purchases are made; reimbursements of an operating expense (e.g., advertising) are recorded as reductions of the related expense.
During fiscal 2004, the Company implemented a change in accounting principle from valuing retail gasoline inventories at the lower of cost
or market using the LIFO method to using the FIFO method.
Long-lived Assets
The Company periodically monitors under-performing stores for an indication that the carrying amount of assets may not be recoverable.
If the sum of the expected future undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the assets, including goodwill where applicable, an
impairment loss is recognized. Impairment is based on the estimated fair value of the asset. Fair value is based on management’s estimate of the
amount that could be realized from the sale of assets in a current transaction between willing parties. The estimate is derived from offers, actual sale or
disposition of assets subsequent to year-end, and other indications of asset value. In determining whether an asset is impaired, assets are grouped at the
lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets, which for the Company is
generally on a store-by-store basis. The Company incurred impairment charges of $600 in fiscal 2006, $1,775 in fiscal 2005, and $400 in fiscal 2004.
Self-insurance
The Company is primarily self-insured for workers’ compensation, general liability, and automobile claims. The self-insurance claim liability
is determined actuarially based on claims filed and an estimate of claims incurred but not yet reported. Actuarial projections of the losses are employed
due to the high degree of variability in the liability estimates. Some factors affecting the uncertainty of claims include the development time frame,
settlement patterns, litigation and adjudication direction, and medical treatment and cost trends. The liability is not discounted. The Company
increased the self-insurance reserve by $1,096 in fiscal 2006 and $2,118 in fiscal 2005.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Due to the nature of the Company’s business, most sales are for cash; cash from operations is the Company’s primary source of liquidity.
The Company finances its inventory purchases primarily from normal trade credit aided by relatively rapid inventory turnover. This turnover allows the
19
Company to conduct its operations without large amounts of cash and working capital. As of April 30, 2006, the Company’s ratio of current assets to
current liabilities was .79 to 1, primarily due to a large increase in accounts payable caused by higher priced gasoline. The ratio at April 30, 2005 and at
April 30, 2004 was .84 to 1 and 1.01 to 1, respectively. Management believes that the Company’s current $50,000 bank line of credit together with cash
flow from operations will be sufficient to satisfy the working capital needs of its business.
Net cash provided by operations increased $18,078 (13.9%) in the year ended April 30, 2006, primarily because of an increase in net earnings and
a large increase in accounts payable. This result was partially offset by an increase in inventories. Cash used in investing in the year ended April 30, 2006 rose
$7,539 (8.1%) due to an increase in the purchase of property and equipment and the acquisition of a business. Cash used in financing decreased $9,938
(26.9%), primarily because of a decrease in long-term debt payments.
Capital expenditures represent the single largest use of Company funds. Management believes that by reinvesting in Corporate Stores, the
Company will be better able to respond to competitive challenges and increase operating efficiencies. During fiscal 2006, the Company expended
$104,449 for property and equipment, primarily for the construction, acquisition, and remodeling of Corporate Stores, compared with $95,447 in the
prior year. In fiscal 2007, the Company anticipates expending approximately $125,000, primarily from existing cash and funds generated by operations,
for construction, acquisition, and remodeling of Corporate Stores.
As of April 30, 2006, the Company had long-term debt of $106,512 consisting of $30,000 in principal amount of 7.38% senior notes; $28,000 in
principal amount of senior notes, series A through series F, with interest rates ranging from 6.18% to 7.23%; $45,714 in principal amount of 7.89% senior
notes, series A; $1,392 of mortgage notes payable; and $1,406 of capital lease obligations.
Interest on the 7.38% senior notes is payable on the 29th day of each June and December. Principal of the 7.38% senior notes matures in 21
semi-annual installments beginning December 29, 2010 with the remaining principal payable December 29, 2020 at the rate of 7.38% per annum. The Company
may prepay the 7.38% notes in whole or in part at any time in an amount of not less than $1,000 or in integral multiples of $100 in excess thereof at a
redemption price calculated in accordance with the Note Agreement dated December 1, 1995 between the Company and the purchaser of the 7.38% notes.
Interest on the 6.18% to 7.23% senior notes series A through series F is payable on the 23rd day of each April and October. Principal of the
6.18% to 7.23% senior notes series A through series F matures in various installments beginning April 23, 2004. The Company may prepay the 6.18% to
7.23% senior notes series A through series F in whole or in part at any time in an amount of not less than $1,000 or integral multiples of $100 in excess
thereof at a redemption price calculated in accordance with the Note Agreement dated April 15, 1999 between the Company and the purchasers of the
6.18% to 7.23% senior notes series A through series F.
Interest on the 7.89% series A senior notes is payable semi-annually the 15th day of May and November in each year commencing November
15, 2000. The 7.89% senior notes mature May 15, 2010 with prepayments of principal commencing on May 15, 2004 and each May 15 thereafter to and
including May 15, 2009. The remaining principal is payable at maturity on May 15, 2010. The Company may at any time prepay the 7.89% senior notes in
whole or in part in an amount not less than $2,000 at a redemption price calculated in accordance with the Note Purchase Agreement dated May 1, 2000
between the Company and the purchasers of the 7.89% senior notes.
To date, the Company has funded capital expenditures primarily from the proceeds of the sale of common stock, issuance of 6.25% convertible
subordinated debentures (converted into shares of common stock in 1994), the previously described senior notes, a mortgage note and through funds
generated from operations. Future capital required to finance operations, improvements, and the anticipated growth in the number of Corporate Stores
is expected to come from cash generated by operations, the bank line of credit, and additional long-term debt or other securities as circumstances may
dictate. Such capital needs are not expected to adversely affect liquidity.
20
The table below presents significant contractual obligations, including interest, of the Company at April 30, 2006:
Senior notes
Mortgage notes
Capital lease obligations
Operating leases
Senior notes
Mortgage notes
Capital lease obligations
Operating leases
2007
2008
2009
2010
$
23,887
$
23,725
$
22,495
$
17,265
36,009
642
274
890
635
141
470
605
68
120
251
57
$
60,812
$
25,391
$
23,638
$
17,693
2011
$
17,723
--------
--------
50
Thereafter
$
60,643
--------
--------
119
Total
$ 165,738
37,489
2,133
709
$
17,773
$
60,762
$ 206,069
Included in mortgage notes for fiscal 2007 in the table above is $23,776 relating to the purchase of the Gas ‘N Shop chain, of which $22,430 may
be paid in future years. The seller has an option at any time to make an immediate sale of any or all of the stores or to lease any of the stores to the Company
for a period of five years and an option at any time during that five-year period to require the Company to purchase any leased store and pay the applicable
purchase price upon forty-five days’ notice. The annual lease payments are equal to 6% of the purchase price of the stores leased and are paid monthly
during the term of the lease. See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the purchase of Gas ‘N Shop.
At April 30, 2006, the Company was partially self-insured for workers’ compensation claims in all 9 states of its marketing territory and
was also partially self-insured for general liability and auto liability under an agreement that provides for annual stop-loss limits equal to or exceeding
approximately $1,000. To facilitate this agreement, letters of credit approximating $7,500 were issued and outstanding at April 30, 2006 and 2005 on the
insurance company’s behalf. The Company renews the letters of credit on an annual basis.
Forward-looking Statements
This Form 10-K contains various “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 as amended and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended. Forward-looking statements represent the Company's expectations or beliefs concerning
future events, including (i) any statements regarding future sales and gross profit percentages, (ii) any statements regarding the continuation of historical
trends, and (iii) any statements regarding the sufficiency of the Company’s cash balances and cash generated from operations and financing activities for
the Company’s future liquidity and capital resource needs. The words believe, expect, anticipate, intend, estimate, project and similar expressions are
intended to identify forward-looking statements. The Company cautions that these statements are further qualified by important factors that could cause
actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements, including without limitations the factors described in this Form 10-K.
Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements because they speak only of the Company’s views as
of the statement dates. Although the Company has attempted to list the important factors that presently affect the Company’s business and operating
results, the Company further cautions investors that other factors may in the future prove to be important in affecting the Company’s results of operations.
The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events, or otherwise.
In addition to any assumptions and other factors referred to specifically in connection with such forward-looking statements, factors that could
cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from those contemplated in any forward-looking statements include, among others, the following:
21
Competition
The Company’s business is highly competitive and marked by ease of entry and constant change in terms of the numbers and type of retailers
offering the products and services found in Corporate Stores. Many of the food (including prepared foods) and nonfood items similar or identical to those
sold by the Company are generally available from a variety of competitors in the communities served by Corporate Stores, and the Company competes
with other convenience store chains, gasoline stations, supermarkets, drug stores, discount stores, club stores, mass merchants, and fast-food outlets
(with respect to the sale of prepared foods). Sales of such nongasoline items (particularly prepared food items) have contributed substantially to the
Company’s gross profit from retail sales in recent years. Gasoline sales are also intensely competitive. The Company competes for gasoline sales with both
independent and national brand gasoline stations, other convenience store chains, and several non-traditional gasoline retailers such as supermarkets in
specific markets. Some of these other gasoline retailers may have access to more favorable arrangements for gasoline supply then does the Company or
the firms that supply its stores. Some of the Company’s competitors have greater financial, marketing, and other resources than the Company, and, as a
result, may be able to respond better to changes in the economy and new opportunities within the industry.
Gasoline Operations
Gasoline sales are an important part of the Company’s revenue and earnings, and retail gasoline profit margins have a substantial impact on
the Company’s net income. Profit margins on gasoline sales can be affected adversely by factors beyond the control of the Company, including the supply
of gasoline available in the retail gasoline market, uncertainty or volatility in the wholesale gasoline market, increases in wholesale gasoline costs generally
during a period, and price competition from other gasoline marketers. The market for crude oil and domestic wholesale petroleum products is volatile
and is affected by general political conditions and instability in oil producing regions such as the Middle East and South America. The volatility of the
wholesale gasoline market makes it extremely difficult to predict the impact of future wholesale cost fluctuation on the Company’s operating results and
financial conditions. These factors could materially affect the Company’s gasoline gallon volume, gasoline gross profit, and overall customer traffic levels
at Corporate Stores. Any substantial decrease in profit margins on gasoline sales or in the number of gallons sold by Corporate Stores could have a material
adverse effect on the Company’s earnings.
The Company purchases its gasoline from a variety of independent national and regional petroleum distributors. Although in recent years
the Company’s suppliers have not experienced any difficulties in obtaining sufficient amounts of gasoline to meet the Company’s needs, unanticipated
national and international events could result in a reduction of gasoline supplies available for distribution to the Company. Any substantial curtailment
in gasoline supplied to the Company would reduce its gasoline sales. Further, management believes that a significant amount of the Company’s business
results from the patronage of customers primarily desiring to purchase gasoline; accordingly, reduced gasoline supplies could adversely affect the sale of
nongasoline items. Such factors could have a material adverse impact upon the Company’s earnings and operations.
Tobacco Products
Sales of tobacco products represent a significant portion of the Company’s revenues. Significant increases in wholesale cigarette costs and tax increases
on tobacco products as well as national and local campaigns to discourage smoking in the United States could have an adverse effect on the demand for
cigarettes sold by Corporate Stores. The Company attempts to pass price increases on to its customers, but competitive pressures in specific markets may prevent
it from doing so. These factors could materially affect the retail price of cigarettes, the volume of cigarettes sold by Corporate Stores, and overall customer traffic.
Environmental Compliance Costs
The United States Environmental Protection Agency and several of the states in which the Company does business have adopted laws and
regulations relating to underground storage tanks used for petroleum products. Substantial costs have been incurred by the Company in the past to
comply with such laws and regulations, and additional substantial costs may be necessary in the future. Several states in which the Company does
business have trust fund programs with provisions for sharing or reimbursing corrective action or remediation costs. Any reimbursements received in
respect to such costs typically are subject to statutory provisions requiring repayment of the reimbursed funds for any future noncompliance with
upgrade provisions or other applicable laws. Although the Company regularly accrues expenses for the estimated costs related to its future corrective
22
action or remediation efforts, there can be no assurance that such accrued amounts will be sufficient to pay such costs or that the Company has identified
all environmental liabilities at all of its current store locations. In addition, there can be no assurance that the Company will not incur substantial
expenditures in the future for remediation of contamination or related claims that have not been discovered or asserted with respect to existing store
locations or locations that the Company may acquire in the future, that the Company will not be subject to any claims for reimbursement of funds
disbursed to the Company under the various state programs, and/or that additional regulations or amendments to existing regulations will not require
additional expenditures beyond those presently anticipated.
Seasonality of Sales
Company sales generally are strongest during its first two fiscal quarters (May–October) and weakest during its third and fourth fiscal quarters
(November–April). In the warmer months, customers tend to purchase greater quantities of gasoline and certain convenience items such as beer, soft
drinks, and ice. Difficult weather conditions (such as flooding, prolonged rain, or snowstorms) in any quarter, however, may adversely reduce sales at
affected Corporate Stores and may have an adverse impact on the Company’s earnings for that period.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company’s exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to its investment portfolio and long-term debt obligations.
The Company places its investments with high-quality credit issuers and, by policy, limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer. As stated in its
policy, the Company’s first priority is to reduce the risk of principal loss. Consequently, the Company seeks to preserve its invested funds by limiting
default risk, market risk, and reinvestment risk. The Company mitigates default risk by investing in only high quality credit securities that it believes to be
low risk and by positioning its portfolio to respond appropriately to a significant reduction in a credit rating of any investment issuer or guarantor. The
portfolio includes only marketable securities with active secondary or resale markets to ensure portfolio liquidity. The Company believes an immediate
100 basis point move in interest rates affecting the Company’s floating and fixed rate financial instruments as of April 30, 2006 would have no material
effect on pretax earnings.
The Company has used a variety of derivative instruments such as options and futures to hedge against the volatility of gasoline cost. The
Company is at risk for possible changes in the market value for these derivative instruments. It is anticipated that such risk would be mitigated by price
changes in the underlying hedged items. Market risks associated with all of the Company’s derivative contracts are reviewed regularly by management.
No derivative instruments were used during fiscal year 2006. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein for additional information
concerning the Company’s use of such derivative instruments.
23
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Casey’s General Stores, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Casey’s General Stores, Inc. and subsidiaries as of April 30, 2006 and
2005 and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
April 30, 2006. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
Casey’s General Stores, Inc. and subsidiaries as of April 30, 2006 and 2005 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended April 30, 2006 in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness
of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of April 30, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated July 7, 2006, expressed an unqualified
opinion on management’s assessment of, and effective operation of, internal control over financial reporting.
Des Moines, Iowa
July 7, 2006
24
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Casey’s General Stores, Inc.:
We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting appearing under Item 9A, that Casey’s General Stores, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) maintained effective internal control over
financial reporting as of April 30, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal
control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial
reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting,
evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such
other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal
control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and
fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to
permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention
or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any
evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, management’s assessment that Casey’s General Stores, Inc. and subsidiaries maintained effective internal control over financial
reporting as of April 30, 2006 is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Also, in our opinion, the Company maintained in all material respects
effective internal control over financial reporting as of April 30, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated
balance sheets of Casey’s General Stores, Inc. and subsidiaries as of April 30, 2006 and 2005 and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended April 30, 2006, and our report dated July 7, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion
on those consolidated financial statements.
Des Moines, Iowa
July 7, 2006
25
CASEY’S GENERAL STORES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share amounts)
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Receivables
Inventories (Note 1)
Prepaid expenses (Note 6)
Income taxes receivable
Total current assets
Other assets, net of amortization (Note 1)
Goodwill
Property and equipment, at cost
Land
Buildings and leasehold improvements
Machinery and equipment
Leasehold interest in property and equipment (Note 7)
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
Net property and equipment
Total assets
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Current liabilities
Current maturities of long-term debt (Note 3)
Accounts payable
Accrued expenses
Property taxes
Self-insurance
Other (Note 10)
Total current liabilities
Long-term debt, net of current maturities (Note 3)
Deferred income taxes (Note 6)
Deferred compensation (Note 8)
Other long-term liabilities
Total liabilities
Shareholders’ equity (Note 4)
Preferred stock, no par value, none issued
Common stock, no par value, 50,368,662 and 50,189,812 shares
issued and outstanding at April 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively
Retained earnings
Total shareholders’ equity
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 7, 9, and 10)
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
26
2006
75,369
9,672
96,255
7,063
3,047
191,406
6,894
14,414
211,910
457,778
575,109
20,316
1,265,113
490,288
774,825
987,539
51,628
146,121
11,418
15,635
18,894
243,696
106,512
99,929
7,236
6,976
464,349
--------
49,161
474,029
523,190
987,539
$
$
$
$
April 30,
2005
49,051
7,481
75,392
4,579
5,927
142,430
1,383
4,184
196,840
429,056
537,026
7,187
1,170,109
447,197
722,912
870,909
27,636
100,640
10,483
14,539
16,829
170,127
123,064
102,039
6,542
--------
401,772
--------
46,516
422,621
469,137
870,909
$
$
$
$
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Net sales
Franchise revenue
Cost of goods sold
Operating expenses
Depreciation and amortization
Interest, net (Note 3)
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes
Federal and state income taxes
Net earnings from continuing operations
Loss on discontinued operations, net of tax benefit
Years ended April 30,
2006
2005
2004
$
3,514,464
$
2,803,593
$
2,323,762
681
1,065
1,669
3,515,145
2,804,658
2,325,431
2,987,505
363,443
57,185
8,896
2,346,295
328,472
51,979
10,739
1,903,466
305,306
48,213
12,398
3,417,029
2,737,485
2,269,383
98,116
35,176
62,940
67,173
24,831
42,342
56,048
18,203
37,845
of $888, $3,574, and $881
1,389
5,589
1,379
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
benefit of $692
Net earnings
Basic
Earnings from continuing operations
Loss on discontinued operations, net of tax benefit
Cumulative effect of accounting change
Net earnings per common share
Diluted
Earnings from continuing operations
Loss on discontinued operations, net of tax benefit
Cumulative effect of accounting change
Net earnings per common share
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
1,083
60,468
1.25
0.03
0.02
1.20
1.24
0.03
0.02
1.19
$
$
$
$
$
--------
36,753
0.84
0.11
--------
0.73
0.84
0.11
--------
0.73
$
$
$
$
$
--------
36,466
0.76
0.03
--------
0.73
0.76
0.03
--------
0.73
$
$
$
$
$
27
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Balance at April 30, 2003
Net earnings
Payment of dividends
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
(346,750 shares)
Tax benefits related to nonqualified stock options
(Note 3)
Balance at April 30, 2004
Net earnings
Payment of dividends
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
(173,950 shares)
Tax benefits related to nonqualified stock options
(Note 3)
Balance at April 30, 2005
Net earnings
Payment of dividends
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
(178,850 shares)
Tax benefits related to nonqualified stock options
Common
Retained
stock earnings
Total
$
$
$
40,008
--------
--------
$
365,652
$
405,660
36,466
(6,479)
36,466
(6,479)
3,643
--------
3,643
504
--------
504
44,155
--------
--------
$
395,639
$
439,794
36,753
(9,771)
36,753
(9,771)
1,893
--------
1,893
468
--------
468
46,516
--------
--------
$
422,621
$
469,137
60,468
(9,060)
60,468
(9,060)
2,139
--------
2,139
(Note 3)
506
--------
506
Balance at April 30, 2006
$
49,161
$
474,029
$
523,190
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
28
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
Cash flows from continuing operations
Net earnings from continuing operations
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to
net cash provided by continuing operations
Cumulative effect of accounting change
Depreciation and amortization
Other amortization
Loss on sale of property and equipment
Deferred income taxes
Changes in assets and liabilities
Receivables
Inventories
Prepaid expenses
Accounts payable
Accrued expenses
Income taxes receivable
Other, net
Net cash provided by continuing operations
Cash flows from investing
Purchase of property and equipment
Payments for acquisition of business
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment
Net cash used in investing activities
Cash flows from financing
Payments of long-term debt
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
Payments of cash dividends
Net cash used in financing activities
Cash flows from discontinued operations
Operating cash flows
Investing cash flows
Net cash flows from discontinued operations
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOWS INFORMATION
Cash paid during the year for
Interest (net of amount capitalized)
Income taxes
Noncash investing and financing activities
Property & equipment and goodwill acquired
Years ended April 30,
2006
2005
2004
$
62,940
$
42,342
$
37,845
(1,083)
57,185
1,871
1,757
(2,110)
(2,191)
(20,863)
(2,384)
45,481
4,096
3,386
(267)
147,818
(99,913)
(4,536)
3,915
(100,534)
(20,018)
2,139
(9,060)
(26,939)
509
5,464
5,973
26,318
49,051
75,369
10,657
32,995
$
$
$
$
--------
51,979
--------
3,041
2,880
(1,730)
2,503
1,813
17,252
7,744
5,423
(3,507)
129,740
(95,447)
--------
2,452
(92,995)
(28,999)
1,893
(9,771)
(36,877)
2,444
852
3,296
3,164
45,887
49,051
11,811
11,303
$
$
--------
48,213
--------
1,447
12,288
(9)
(12,636)
(1,802)
18,508
1,546
(8,217)
805
97,988
(72,597)
--------
3,742
(68,855)
(20,868)
3,643
(6,479)
(23,704)
(86)
--------
(86)
5,343
40,544
45,887
12,904
14,158
through installment purchases or business acquisitions
27,458
7,197
11,080
Increase in common stock and increase in
income taxes receivable due to tax benefits
related to nonqualified stock options (Note 3)
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
506
468
504
29
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
1. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Operations Casey’s General Stores, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company) operate 1,413 convenience stores in 9 Midwest states. At April 30, 2006,
the Company owned or leased 1,394 of these stores and 19 stores were owned or leased by franchisees. The stores are located primarily in smaller communities,
a majority with populations of less than 5,000. Retail sales in 2006 were distributed as follows: 71% gasoline, 22% grocery & other merchandise, and 7%
prepared food & fountain. The Company’s materials are readily available, and the Company is not dependent on a single supplier or only a few suppliers.
Principles of consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of Casey’s General Stores, Inc. and its
wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect 1) the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and 2) the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash equivalents Cash equivalents consist of money market funds. The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity at
purchase of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Inventories Inventories, which consist of merchandise and gasoline, are stated at the lower of cost or market; in-store inventory (excluding
cigarettes, beer, pop, and prepared foods, which are stated at cost) is determined by the retail method (RIM). Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out
(FIFO) method for gasoline and the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method for merchandise. Below is a summary of the inventory values at April 30, 2006 and 2005:
Gasoline
Merchandise
Fiscal 2006
$ 43,932
70,813
Merchandise LIFO reserve
(18,490)
Fiscal 2005
$ 27,823
64,198
(16,629)
Total inventory
$ 96,255
$ 75,392
Goodwill SFAS No. 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets requires that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives no longer be
amortized to earnings but be tested for impairment at least annually. As of April 30, 2006, there was $14,414 of goodwill, and the test completed at the
fiscal year-end yielded no evidence of impairment.
Store closings and asset impairment The Company writes down property and equipment of stores it is closing to estimated net realizable value at
the time management commits to a plan to close such stores and begins active marketing of the stores. The Company bases the estimated net realizable
value of property and equipment on its experience in utilizing and/or disposing of similar assets and on estimates provided by its own and/or third-party
real estate experts. The results of operations of certain stores are presented as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of
earnings in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144, Accounting of the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. Any such store is presented in
discontinued operations beginning in the quarter in which management commits to a plan to close the store and actively markets the store. Operating
results of discontinued operations include related writedowns of stores to estimated net realizable value. The Company does not allocate interest expense
to discontinued operations. Included in the loss on discontinued operations were losses on disposal of $1,562 (net of $609 tax benefit) for the year ended
April 30, 2006. Losses on disposal of $6,830 (net of $2,664 tax benefit) were recorded for the year ended April 30, 2005; there were no losses on disposal for the
year ended April 30, 2004. Assets held for sale at April 30, 2006 and 2005 were $1,225 and $13,723, respectively, and are included in net property & equipment.
30
The Company periodically monitors underperforming stores for an indication that the carrying amount of assets may not be recoverable. If the
sum of the expected future undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the assets, including goodwill where applicable, an impairment
loss is recognized. Impairment is based on the estimated fair value of the asset. Fair value is based on management’s estimate of the amount that could
be realized from the sale of assets in a current transaction between willing parties. The estimate is derived from offers, actual sale or disposition of assets
subsequent to year-end, and other indications of asset value. In determining whether an asset is impaired, assets are grouped at the lowest level for which
there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets, which for the Company is generally on a store-by-store
basis. The Company incurred impairment charges of $600 in fiscal 2006, $1,775 in fiscal 2005, and $400 in fiscal 2004. Impairment charges are a component of
operating expenses.
Depreciation and amortization Depreciation of property and equipment and amortization of capital lease assets are computed principally by
the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:
Buildings
Machinery and equipment
25-40 years
5-30 years
Leasehold interest in property and equipment
Lesser of term of lease or life of asset
Leasehold improvements
Lesser of term of lease or life of asset
Excise taxes Excise taxes approximating $377,000, $365,000, and $345,000 collected from customers on retail gasoline sales are included
in net sales for fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.
Income taxes Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured
using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.
The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
Revenue recognition The Company recognizes retail sales of gasoline, grocery & other merchandise, and prepared food & fountain at the
time of sale to the customer. Wholesale sales to franchisees are recognized at the time of delivery to the franchise location. Franchise fees, license fees
to franchisees, and rent for franchise façades are recognized monthly when billed to the franchisees. Other maintenance services and transportation
charges are recognized at the time the service is provided.
Vendor allowances include rebates and other funds received from vendors to promote their products. The Company often receives such
allowances on the basis of quantitative contract terms that vary by product and vendor or directly on the basis of purchases made. Rebates are recognized
as reductions of inventory costs when purchases are made; reimbursements of an operating expense (e.g., advertising) are recorded as reductions of the
related expense.
Discontinued operations Sales from discontinued operations were $15,534, $47,644 and $45,158 for the years ended April 30, 2006, 2005, and
2004, respectively. Losses from discontinued operations were $1,389 for the year ended April 30, 2006, including a $1,562 pretax loss on disposal. Losses
from discontinued operations were $5,589 and $1,379 for the years ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Losses from discontinued operations were
net of tax benefits of $888, $3,574, and $881 for the years ended April 30, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.
The Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of April 30, 2006 included $1,225 in net property and equipment classified as assets held for sale;
there were no related liabilities pertaining to discontinued operations. The Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of April 30, 2005 included $13,723 in
net property and equipment and no related liabilities pertaining to discontinued operations.
31
Earnings per common share Basic earnings per share have been computed by dividing net income by the weighted average outstanding
common shares during each of the years. Calculation of diluted earnings per share treats stock options outstanding as potential common shares.
Environmental remediation liabilities The Company accounts for environmental remediation liabilities in accordance with the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ Statement of Position (SOP) 96-1, Environmental Remediation Liabilities. SOP 96-1 requires, among other
things, environmental remediation liabilities to be accrued when the criteria of SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, are met.
Derivative instruments The Company periodically uses a variety of derivative instruments such as options and futures to hedge against the volatility
of gasoline cost. The Company is at risk for possible changes in the market value for these derivative instruments. It is anticipated that such risk would be mitigated
by price changes in the underlying hedged items. Market risks associated with all of the Company’s derivative contracts are reviewed regularly by management.
There were no options or futures contracts during the year ended April 30, 2006. At April 30, 2005, however, the Company had accumulated net
hedging losses before income taxes of $929 on closed options and futures contracts; it had net hedging gains before income taxes of $281 for the year ended
April 30, 2004. The amounts represented the fair value of the contracts as determined using various indices and dealer quotes. These derivative contracts were
not linked to specific assets or liabilities on the balance sheet or to forecasted transactions in an accounting hedge relationship and therefore did not qualify
for hedge accounting. The contracts were carried at fair value with any changes in fair value recorded as part of cost of goods sold in the income statement.
Stock-based compensation The Company applies APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, in accounting for its incentive
stock option plan; accordingly, the financial statements recognize no compensation cost for stock options issued at fair market value on the date of grant. The
Company has elected the pro forma disclosure option of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.
Pro forma net earnings and pro forma net earnings per common share have been provided as if SFAS No. 123 were adopted for all stock-based compensation
plans. Had the Company determined compensation cost of its stock options based on the fair value at the grant date under SFAS No. 123, the Company’s
net income would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts shown in the following table:
Net income as reported
Deducted amount
Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined
by fair-value method for awards, net of related tax effects
Pro forma net income
Basic earnings per common share
As reported
Pro forma
Diluted earnings per common share
As reported
Pro forma
Years ended April 30,
2006
60,468
458
60,010
1.20
1.19
1.19
1.19
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2005
36,753
302
36,451
0.73
0.73
0.73
0.72
$
$
$
$
$
$
2004
36,466
204
36,262
0.73
0.73
0.73
0.73
The weighted average fair value of the stock options granted during 2006, 2005, and 2004 was $6.06, $4.36, and $3.96 per share, respectively,
on the date of grant. Fair value was calculated using the Black Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions: 2006—
expected dividend yield of 0.87%, risk-free interest rate of 4.04%, estimated volatility of 24%, and an expected life of 6.2 years; 2005—expected dividend
yield of 0.95%, risk-free interest rate of 3.75%, estimated volatility of 24%, and an expected life of 5.8 years; 2004—expected dividend yield of 0.89%,
risk-free interest rate of 3.9%, estimated volatility of 24%, and an expected life of 5.8 years.
32
Recent Accounting Pronouncements In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 123 (Revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment. SFAS No. 123R is a revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes Accounting Principles Board
(APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and its related implementation guidance. SFAS No. 123R focuses primarily on accounting
for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services through share-based payment transactions. SFAS No. 123R requires a public entity to measure
the cost of employee services received in exchange for the award of equity instruments based on the fair value of the award at the date of grant. The cost
will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award. SFAS No. 123R is effective as of the
beginning of the first annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. The Company will adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 123R effective May 1, 2006
using the modified prospective method. Management believes the impact on net earnings as a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 123R will be approximately
$330 in fiscal 2007. Estimated compensation expense related to prior periods can be found in Note 1 of the Consolidated Financial Statements. The ultimate
amount of increased compensation expense will depend on the number, timing, and vesting period of option shares granted during the year.
In March 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset
Retirement Obligations. This interpretation clarifies that the term “conditional asset retirement obligation” as used in FASB Statement No. 143,
Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, refers to a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and/or method of
settlement are conditioned on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. The obligation to perform the asset retirement
activity is unconditional even though uncertainty exits about the timing and/or method of settlement, which may be conditioned on a future event.
Accordingly, an entity is required to recognize a liability for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation if the fair value of the liability can
be reasonably estimated. The fair value of a liability for the conditional asset retirement obligation should be recognized when incurred—generally
upon acquisition, construction, or development—or through the normal operation of the asset. Uncertainty about the timing and/or method of settlement
should be factored into the measurement of the liability when sufficient information exists. Statement No. 143 acknowledges that in some cases, sufficient
information may not be available to make a reasonable estimate of fair value of an asset retirement obligation and clarifies when an entity would have
sufficient information to do so.
The Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 47 in May 2005 and recorded an estimated liability of $3,117 for the future cost of removal
of the underground storage tanks in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 143 and will recognize the cost over the tank’s estimated useful life.
A corresponding increase to the carrying value of the related long-lived assets of $1,343 was recorded at that time. The Company will amortize the
amount added to other assets and recognize accretion expense for the discounted liability over the estimated remaining life of the tanks. The cumulative
effect of this accounting change resulted in a one-time pretax charge of $1,775 ($1,083 net of tax benefit). Prior to May 1, 2005, the Company had
recognized a retirement obligation for underground storage tanks that the Company knew would be removed in the future (i.e. when a store replacement or
closing had been planned). All remaining underground storage tanks were considered to have indeterminable lives when the Company adopted SFAS No. 143.
Other accounting standards have been issued or proposed by the FASB or other standard-setting bodies that do not require adoption until a
future date. These standards are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements upon adoption.
Reclassifications Certain amounts in the prior years’ financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current-year presentation.
The Company has separately disclosed the operating and investing portions of the cash flows attributable to its discontinued operations, which in prior
periods were reported combined with operations. The Iowa ethanol tax credit of $1,197 in fiscal 2005 and $871 in fiscal 2004 was originally recorded as an
income tax credit and is now recorded as a reduction in gasoline cost of goods sold. It is actually a refund of an excise tax that the Company receives independent
of whether the Company earns any income. The ethanol credit earned in fiscal 2006 was $1,738.
33
2. BUSINESS ACQUISITION
Commencing January 5, 2006, the Company purchased 51 Gas ‘N Shop (GNS) convenience stores from a single-owner, 66-store chain
headquartered in Lincoln, NE. The chain was purchased to increase substantially the Company’s presence in Nebraska. The Company issued no
Casey’s stock nor did it acquire any GNS stock as part of the transaction. The trade name Gas ‘N Shop was also acquired, but the stores not purchased
in the transaction were allowed to operate under that name for two years or until their sale to another third party, whichever is sooner. The Company
began rebranding the GNS stores to Casey’s General Stores immediately upon acquisition.
The GNS stores were valued using a discounted cash flow model that was applied on a location by location basis. The model projects future cash flows
and calculates a return on investment after capital expenditures for rebranding to Casey’s. The purchase price was determined using a targeted rate of return.
The acquisition was recorded by allocating the cost of the assets acquired, including intangible assets and liabilities assumed, based on their
estimated fair values at the acquisition date. The excess of the cost of the acquisition over the net of amounts assigned to the fair value of the assets
acquired and the liabilities assumed was recorded as goodwill. The purchase price of $29,194 was allocated as follows:
Land
Buildings
Equipment
Other assets
Goodwill
$ 4,575
13,444
2,400
101
8,674
As of April 30, 2006, $4,536 had been paid and the remaining $24,658 had been recorded in current maturities of long-term debt. The Asset Purchase
Agreement allows the seller to make an immediate sale of any or all of the stores or to lease any of the stores to the Company for a period of five years and grants
to the seller an option at any time during that five-year period to require the Company to purchase any leased store and pay the applicable purchase price upon
forty-five days’ notice. The annual lease payments are equal to 6% of the purchase price of the stores leased and are paid monthly during the term of the lease.
As of April 30, 2006, principal payments of $500 have been made on this debt, and any remaining principal balance must be paid by January 2011.
The results of operations of the GNS stores from the date of acquisition through April 30, 2006 are included in the statement of earnings and
statement of cash flows. Disclosure of pro forma financial statements were considered inconsequential for the periods under audit.
3. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND LONG-TERM DEBT
A summary of the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments follows.
Cash and cash equivalents, receivables, and accounts payable The carrying amount approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these
instruments or the recent purchase of the instruments at current rates of interest.
Long-term debt The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt excluding capital lease obligations is estimated based on the current rates
offered to the Company for debt of the same or similar issues. The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt excluding capital lease obligations was
approximately $126,000 and $157,000, respectively, at April 30, 2006 and 2005.
Interest expense is net of interest income of $1,308, $649, and $437 for the years ended April 30, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. Interest
expense in the amount of $398, $323, and $398 was capitalized during the years ended April 30, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.
34
The next table delineates the Company’s long-term debt at carrying value.
April 30,
2006
2005
Capitalized lease obligations discounted at 4.75%
to 10% due in various monthly installments through 2009 (Note 7)
$
1,964
$
2,503
Mortgage notes payable due in various installments
through 2009 with interest at 6% to 7%
37,033
13,626
7.38% senior notes due in 21 semi-annual installments
beginning in December 2010
30,000
30,000
Senior notes due in various installments from 2004
through 2019 with interest at 6.18% to 7.23%
32,000
36,000
7.89% senior notes due in 7 annual installments
beginning in May 2004
57,143
158,140
68,571
150,700
Less current maturities
51,628
27,636
$
106,512
$
123,064
Various debt agreements contain certain operating and financial covenants. At April 30, 2006, the Company was in compliance with
all covenants. Listed below are the aggregate maturities of long-term debt, including capitalized lease obligations, for the 5 years commencing
May 1, 2006 and thereafter:
Years ended April 30,
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Thereafter
$
51,628
17,841
17,448
12,794
13,857
44,572
$ 158,140
Included in current maturities for fiscal 2007 in the tables above is $24,158 relating to the purchase of the Gas ‘N Shop chain, which may be
paid in future years. The seller has an option at any time to make an immediate sale of any or all of the stores or to lease any of the stores to the Company
for a period of five years and an option at any time during that five-year period to require the Company to purchase any leased store and pay the applicable
purchase price upon forty-five days’ notice. The annual lease payments are equal to 6% of the purchase price of the stores leased and are paid monthly
during the term of the lease. See Note 2 for additional information regarding the purchase of Gas ‘N Shop.
35
4. PREFERRED AND COMMON STOCK
Preferred stock The Company has 1,000,000 authorized shares of preferred stock, none of which has been issued.
Common stock The Company currently has 120,000,000 authorized shares of common stock. Dividends paid totaled $0.18, $0.195, and $0.13
per share for the years ended April 30, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. Historically, the Company recorded dividends at the time of payment, which
typically followed by several weeks the date on which dividends were declared. On May 1, 2004, the Company began recording dividends as of the date of
declaration. As a result, the Company’s records show two quarterly dividends paid in the first quarter of fiscal 2005, the first of which ($0.035) was for the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2004 and the second of which ($0.04) was for the first quarter of fiscal 2005.
Common share purchase rights On June 14, 1989, the Board of Directors adopted the Shareholder Rights Plan, providing for the distribution
of one common share purchase right for each share of common stock outstanding. The rights generally become exercisable 10 days following a public
announcement that 15% or more of the Company’s common stock has been acquired or an intent to acquire has become apparent. The rights will expire
on the earlier of June 14, 2009 or redemption by the Company. Certain terms of the rights are subject to adjustment to prevent dilution. Further description
and terms of the rights are set forth in the amended Rights Agreement between the Company and UMB Bank, n.a., which serves as Rights Agent.
Stock option plans Under the Company’s stock option plans, options may be granted to non-employee directors, certain officers, and key
employees to purchase an aggregate of 4,560,000 shares of common stock at option prices not less than the fair market value of the stock (110% of fair
market value for holders of 10% or more of the Company’s stock) at the date the options are granted. Options for 640,664 shares were available for grant
at April 30, 2006, and options for 961,050 shares (which expire between 2007 and 2015) were outstanding.
The following table shows the stock option activity during the periods indicated:
Number of
Weighted average
shares
1,118,850
320,000
(346,750)
(12,750)
1,079,350
14,000
(173,950)
(11,000)
908,400
248,000
(178,850)
(16,500)
961,050
exercise price
$ 11.76
14.02
6.72
13.20
$ 12.80
15.80
10.89
14.08
$ 13.20
20.51
11.96
14.46
$ 15.29
Balance at April 30, 2003
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited
Balance at April 30, 2004
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited
Balance at April 30, 2005
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited
Balance at April 30, 2006
36
At April 30, 2006, the range of exercise prices was $9.44–$20.68 and the weighted average remaining contractual life of outstanding
options was 6.15 years. The number of shares and weighted average remaining contractual life of the options by range of applicable exercise
prices at April 30, 2006 were as follows:
Range of
exercise prices
Number of
shares
Weighted average
exercise price
Weighted average remaining
contractual life (years)
$ 9.44
11.20 – 13.07
14.08 – 15.80
17.64 – 20.68
6,000
238,550
468,500
248,000
961,050
$ 9.44
11.73
14.42
20.51
1.00
3.94
5.75
9.16
5. EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
Computations for basic and diluted earnings per common share are presented below:
2006
2005
2004
Basic
Earnings from continuing operations
Loss on discontinued operations
Cumulative effect of accounting change
Net earnings
Weighted average shares outstanding—basic
Earnings per common share from continuing operations
Loss per common share on discontinued operations
Cumulative effect of accounting change
Basic earnings per common share
Diluted
Earnings from continuing operations
Loss on discontinued operations
Cumulative effect of accounting change
Net earnings
Weighted-average shares outstanding—basic
Plus effect of stock options
Weighted-average shares outstanding—diluted
Earnings per common share from continuing operations
Loss per common share on discontinued operations
Cumulative effect of accounting change
Diluted earnings per common share
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
62,940
1,389
1,083
60,468
50,309,929
1.25
.03
.02
1.20
62,940
1,389
1,083
60,468
50,309,929
300,335
50,610,264
1.24
.03
.02
1.19
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
42,342
5,589
--------
36,753
50,114,695
.84
.11
--------
.73
42,342
5,589
--------
36,753
50,114,695
169,488
50,284,183
.84
.11
--------
.73
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
37,845
1,379
--------
36,466
49,875,620
.76
.03
--------
.73
37,845
1,379
--------
36,466
49,875,620
165,505
50,041,125
.76
.03
--------
.73
37
6. INCOME TAXES
Income tax expense attributable to earnings from continuing operations consisted of the following components:
Current tax expense
Federal
State
Deferred tax expense
Total income tax provision
Years ended April 30,
2006
2005
2004
$
35,488
$
15,337
$
3,625
39,113
(3,937)
2,183
17,520
7,311
$
35,176
$
24,831
$
6,259
1,671
7,930
10,273
18,203
The tax effects of temporary differences that gave rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities were as follows:
Deferred tax assets
Accrued liabilities
Deferred compensation
Other
Total gross deferred tax assets
Valuation allowance
Net deferred tax assets
Deferred tax liabilities
Excess of tax over book depreciation
Other
Total gross deferred tax liabilities
Net deferred tax liability
Years ended April 30,
2006
2005
2004
$
6,373
3,073
1,523
10,969
(184)
10,785
(103,094)
(1,484)
(104,578)
$
5,047
2,551
351
7,949
--------
7,949
(104,754)
(1,614)
(106,368)
$
5,465
2,027
687
8,179
--------
8,179
(100,899)
(974)
(101,873)
$
(93,793)
$
(98,419)
$
(93,694)
The deferred tax assets of $6,136 and $3,620 relating to accrued liabilities are current assets and are included with prepaid expenses as of April 30, 2006
and April 30, 2005, respectively. At April 30, 2006, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards for state income tax purposes of approximately $14,092, which
are available to offset future taxable income. These net operating losses expire during the years 2015 through 2018.
The valuation allowance for deferred tax assets as of April 30, 2006 and 2005 was $184 and $0, respectively. The net change in the valuation allowance for
the years ended April 30, 2006 and 2005 was an increase of $184 and $0, respectively. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it
is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation
of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax
liabilities, projected taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. A valuation allowance has been established for a portion of the amount
of net operating loss carryovers—state taxes as of April 30, 2006 due to the uncertainty of future recoverability. As time passes, management will be able to better
assess the amount of tax benefit it will realize from using the carryforwards.
Total reported tax expense applicable to the Company’s continuing operations varies from the tax that would have resulted from
applying the statutory U.S. federal income tax rates to income before income taxes.
38
Income taxes at the statutory rates
Resolution of tax exposure
Previously unrecorded tax benefits
Federal tax credits
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit
Other
Years ended April 30,
2006
35.0%
--------
--------
(0.7)
1.4
0.2
35.9%
2005
35.0%
--------
--------
(0.9)
2.5
0.4
37.0%
2004
35.0%
(1.2)
(3.2)
(1.2)
2.8
0.3
32.5%
The income tax benefit from discontinued operations was $888, $3,574, and $881 for the years ended April 30, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.
The income tax benefit from the cumulative effect of accounting change was $692 for the year ended April 30, 2006.
7. LEASES
The Company leases certain property and equipment used in its operations. Generally, the leases are for primary terms of from 5 to 20 years with
options either to renew for additional periods or to purchase the premises and call for payment of property taxes, insurance, and maintenance by the lessee.
The following is an analysis of the leased property under capital leases by major classes:
Real estate
Equipment
Less accumulated amortization
Asset balances at April 30,
2006
$
14,221
6,095
20,316
6,113
$
14,203
2005
4,293
2,894
7,187
6,296
891
$
$
Future minimum payments under the capital leases and noncancelable operating leases with initial or remaining terms of 1 year or more
consisted of the following at April 30, 2006:
Years ended April 30,
Capital leases
Operating leases
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Thereafter
Total minimum lease payments
Less amount representing interest
Present value of net minimum lease payments
$
$
642
635
605
251
----
----
2,133
169
1,964
$
$
The total rent expense under operating leases was $564 in 2006, $598 in 2005 and $767 in 2004.
274
141
68
57
50
119
709
39
8. BENEFIT PLANS
401(k) plan Effective April 30, 2003, the Company merged its former employee stock ownership plan with its defined contribution 401(k) plan (Plan).
The Plan covers all employees who meet minimum age and service requirements. The Company contributions consist of matching amounts and are allocated
based on employee contributions. Expense for the Plan was approximately $2,258, $2,149, and $2,038 for the years ended April 30, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.
On April 30, 2006, the Company had 6,024 full-time employees and 9,668 part-time employees; approximately 4,100 were participants in the Plan.
As of that same date, 2,249,565 shares of common stock were held by the trustee of the Plan in trust for distribution to eligible participants upon death,
disability, retirement, or termination of employment. Shares held by the Plan are treated as outstanding in the computation of earnings per common share.
Supplemental executive retirement plan The Company has a nonqualified supplemental executive retirement plan (SERP) for 3 of its executive
officers, 1 of whom retired April 30, 2003. The SERP provides for the Company to pay annual retirement benefits, depending on retirement dates, up to 50%
of base compensation until death of the officer. If death occurs within 20 years of retirement, the benefits become payable to the officer’s spouse until the
spouse’s death or 20 years from the date of the officer’s retirement, whichever comes first. The Company is accruing the deferred compensation over the
expected term of employment. The amount expensed in fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004 was $289, $570, and $746, respectively.
9. COMMITMENTS
The Company has entered into employment agreements with 2 of its executive officers. The agreements provide that the 2 officers will receive
aggregate base compensation of $1,000 per year exclusive of bonuses. These agreements also provide for certain payments in the case of death or disability
of the officers. The Company also has entered into employment agreements with 12 other key employees, providing for certain payments in the event of
termination following a change of control of the Company.
10. CONTINGENCIES
Environmental compliance The United States Environmental Protection Agency and several states have adopted laws and regulations relating
to underground storage tanks used for petroleum products. Several states in which the Company does business have trust fund programs with provisions
for sharing or reimbursing corrective action or remediation costs.
Management currently believes that substantially all capital expenditures for electronic monitoring, cathodic protection, and overfill/spill protection
to comply with existing regulations have been completed. The Company had an accrued liability at April 30, 2006 and 2005 of approximately $200 for estimated
expenses related to anticipated corrective actions or remediation efforts, including relevant legal and consulting costs. Management believes the Company
has no material joint and several environmental liability with other parties. Additional regulations or amendments to the existing regulations could result
in future revisions to such estimated expenditures.
Legal matters The Company is a defendant in several lawsuits arising in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, the
ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Other At April 30, 2006, the Company was partially self-insured for workers’ compensation claims in all 9 states of its marketing territory and was also
partially self-insured for general liability and auto liability under an agreement that provides for annual stop-loss limits equal to or exceeding approximately $1,000.
To facilitate this agreement, letters of credit approximating $7,500 were issued and outstanding at April 30, 2006 on the insurance company’s behalf. The Company
also has investments of approximately $200 in escrow as required by one state for partial self-insurance of workers’ compensation claims. Additionally, the
Company is self-insured for its portion of employee medical expenses. At April 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company had $15,635 and $14,539, respectively, in
accrued expenses for estimated claims relating to self-insurance.
40
11. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (Dollars in thousands) (Unaudited)
Net sales
Gasoline
Grocery & other merchandise
Prepared food & fountain
Other
Gross profit*
Gasoline
Grocery & other merchandise
Prepared food & fountain
Other
Net earnings from continuing operations
Loss on discontinued operations, net of tax benefit
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax benefit
Net earnings
Basic
Earnings from continuing operations
Loss on discontinued operations
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax benefit
Net earnings per common share
Diluted
Earnings from continuing operations
Loss on discontinued operations
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax benefit
Net earnings per common share
Net sales
Gasoline
Grocery & other merchandise
Prepared food & fountain
Other
Gross profit*
Gasoline
Grocery & other merchandise
Prepared food & fountain
Other
Net earnings from continuing operations
Loss on discontinued operations, net of tax benefit
Net earnings
Basic
Earnings from continuing operations
Loss on discontinued operations
Net earnings per common share
Diluted
Earnings from continuing operations
Loss on discontinued operations
Net earnings per common share
*Gross profit is given before charge for depreciation and amortization.
Q1
$ 584,502
213,095
57,475
3,481
$ 858,553
$ 33,867
68,214
36,774
1,322
$ 140,177
$ 22,090
115
1,083
$ 20,892
$
$
$
$
0.44
0.00
0.02
0.42
0.43
0.00
0.02
0.41
Q1
$ 471,983
192,279
51,488
5,681
$ 721,431
$
30,846
60,366
30,255
832
$ 122,299
$
$
$
$
$
$
16,215
276
15,939
0.33
0.01
0.32
0.33
0.01
0.32
Year ended April 30, 2006
Q3
Q2
561,218
703,335
178,119
200,223
56,167
57,935
5,090
3,815
800,594
965,308
Q4
640,225
187,816
57,430
4,538
890,009
Year Total
2,489,280
779,253
229,007
16,924
3,514,464
125,797
248,726
144,312
8,124
526,959
62,940
1,389
1,083
60,468
1.25
0.03
0.02
1.20
1.24
0.03
0.02
1.19
Year Total
1,866,729
712,570
204,479
19,815
2,803,593
109,351
220,521
123,410
4,016
457,298
42,342
5,589
36,753
0.84
0.11
0.73
0.84
0.11
0.73
39,002
66,584
37,419
1,526
144,531
24,588
55,172
35,130
2,982
117,872
28,340
58,756
34,989
2,294
124,379
22,396
203
--------
22,193
0.44
0.00
--------
0.44
0.44
0.00
--------
0.44
7,556
603
--------
6,953
0.15
0.01
--------
0.14
0.15
0.01
--------
0.14
10,898
468
--------
10,430
0.22
0.01
--------
0.21
0.22
0.01
--------
0.21
Year ended April 30, 2005
Q2
461,689
184,429
53,058
5,418
704,594
25,095
57,143
32,259
707
115,204
11,432
426
11,006
0.23
0.01
0.22
0.23
0.01
0.22
Q3
433,857
163,813
48,952
4,499
651,121
25,727
51,422
29,808
1,153
108,110
7,050
4,585
2,465
0.14
0.09
0.05
0.14
0.09
0.05
Q4
499,200
172,049
50,981
4,217
726,447
27,683
51,590
31,088
1,324
111,685
7,645
302
7,343
0.15
0.00
0.15
0.15
0.00
0.15
41
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the
Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that
evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that the Company’s current disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized,
and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.
There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth fiscal quarter covered by this
report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The
Company’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and Board of Directors regarding the
preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective
can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
The Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of April 30, 2006. In making
this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal
Control—Integrated Framework. On the basis of the prescribed criteria, management believes the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was
effective as of April 30, 2006.
KPMG, LLP, as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, has issued a report on its assessment of the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting. This report appears on page 25.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.
42
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Those portions of the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement appearing under the captions “Election of Directors,” “Governance of the
Company,” “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” and “Executive Officers and Their Compensation” to be filed with the
Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after April 30, 2006 and to be used in connection with the Company’s Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to be held on September 15, 2006 are hereby incorporated by reference.
The Company has adopted a Financial Code of Ethics applicable to its Chief Executive Officer and other senior financial officers. In addition,
the Company has adopted a general code of business conduct (known as the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics) for its directors, officers, and all
employees. The Financial Code of Ethics, the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and other Company governance materials are available on the
Company Web site at www.caseys.com. The Company intends to disclose on this Web site any amendments to or waivers from the Financial Code of
Ethics or the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that are required to be disclosed pursuant to SEC rules. To date, there have been no waivers of the
Financial Code of Ethics or the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. Shareholders may obtain copies of any of these corporate governance documents
free of charge by downloading from the Web site or by writing to the Corporate Secretary at the address on the cover of this Form 10-K.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
That portion of the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement appearing under the caption “Executive Officers and Their Compensation” to be filed
with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after April 30, 2006 and to be used in connection with the Company’s Annual Meeting
of Shareholders to be held on September 15, 2006 is hereby incorporated by reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Those portions of the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement appearing under the captions “Shares Outstanding,” “Voting Procedures,” and
“Beneficial Ownership of Shares of Common Stock by Directors and Executive Officers” to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within
120 days after April 30, 2006 and to be used in connection with the Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on September 15, 2006 are
hereby incorporated by reference.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
That portion of the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement appearing under the caption “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” to be
filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after April 30, 2006 and to be used in connection with the Company’s Annual
Meeting of Shareholders to be held on September 15, 2006 is hereby incorporated by reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
That portion of the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement appearing under the caption “Independent Auditor Fees” to be filed with the
Commission within 120 days after April 30, 2006 and to be used in connection with the Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on
September 15, 2006 is hereby incorporated by reference.
43
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)
Documents filed as a part of this report on Form 10-K
(1) The following financial statements are included herewith:
Consolidated Balance Sheets, April 30, 2006 and 2005
Consolidated Statements of Income, Three Years Ended April 30, 2006
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity, Three Years Ended April 30, 2006
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, Three Years Ended April 30, 2006
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
(2) No schedules are included because the required information is inapplicable or is presented in the
consolidated financial statements or related notes thereto.
(3) The following exhibits are filed as a part of this report:
Exhibit
Number
3.1(a)
3.2(a)
Description of Exhibits
Restatement of the Restated and Amended Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference from the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 1996)
Restatement of Amended and Restated By-laws (incorporated by reference from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended January 31, 1997) and Amendments thereto (incorporated by reference from the Quarterly Reports on Form
10-Q for the fiscal quarters ended July 31, 1997 and July 31, 2000)
4.2
Rights Agreement between Casey’s General Stores, Inc. and UMB Bank, n.a. as Rights Agent, relating to Common Share Purchase
Rights (incorporated herein by reference from the Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed June 19, 1989 (0-12788)) and
amendments thereto (incorporated by reference from the Form 8 (Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form
8-A filed June 19, 1989) filed September 10, 1990; the Form 8-A/A (Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement on Form 8-A
filed June 19, 1989) filed March 30, 1994; the Form 8-A12G/A (Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form 8-A
filed June 19, 1989) filed July 29, 1994, the Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 10, 1999; and the Current Report on Form 8-K
filed September 27, 1999)
4.4
4.6
4.7
Note Agreement dated as of December 1, 1995 between Casey’s General Stores, Inc. and Principal Mutual Life Insurance Company
(incorporated by reference from the Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 11, 1996)
Note Agreement dated as of April 15, 1999 among the Company and Principal Life Insurance Company and other purchasers of
$50,000,000 Senior Notes, Series A through Series F (incorporated by reference from the Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 10, 1999)
Note Purchase Agreement dated as of May 1, 2000 among the Company and the purchasers of $80,000,000 in principal amount of 7.89%
Senior Notes, Series 2000-A, due May 15, 2010 (incorporated by reference from the Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 23, 2000)
10.19*
Casey’s General Stores, Inc. 1991 Incentive Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference from the Registration Statement on Form
S-8 (33-42907) filed September 23, 1991) and amendment thereto (incorporated by reference from the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 1994)
10.21(a)*
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with Donald F. Lamberti (incorporated by reference from the Current Report on
Form 8-K filed November 10, 1997) and First Amendment thereto (incorporated by reference from the Current Report on Form 8-K
filed April 2, 1998)
44
10.22(a)*
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with Ronald M. Lamb (incorporated by reference from the Current Report on Form 8-K
filed November 10, 1997) and First Amendment thereto (incorporated by reference from the Current Report on Form 8-K filed
April 2, 1998)
10.24(a)*
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with John G. Harmon (incorporated by reference from the Current Report on Form
8-K filed November 10, 1997), First Amendment thereto (incorporated by reference from the Annual Report on Form 10-K405
for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2001), and Second Amendment thereto (incorporated by reference from the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2004)
10.27
Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
July 31, 1994) and related form of Grant Agreement (incorporated by reference from the Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 3, 2005)
10.28(a)
10.29
Promissory Note delivered to UMB Bank, n.a. (incorporated by reference from the Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 4, 2005)
Form of “change of control” Employment Agreement (incorporated by reference from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
10.30*
Non-Qualified Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference from the Current Report on Form 8-K filed
fiscal quarter ended January 31, 1997)
10.31*
Non-Qualified Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Trust Agreement with UMB Bank, n.a. (incorporated by reference from the
November 10, 1997)
10.32*
10.33*
10.34*
10.35*
10.36
21
23.1
31.1
31.2
32.1
32.2
Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 10, 1997)
Severance Agreement with Douglas K. Shull (incorporated by reference from the Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 28, 1998)
Casey’s General Stores, Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference from the Annual Report on Form 10-K405 for the
fiscal year ended April 30, 2001) and related form of Grant Agreement (incorporated by reference from the Current Report on
Form 8-K filed July 6, 2005)
Casey’s General Stores 401(k) Plan (incorporated by reference from the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2003)
Trustar Directed Trust Agreement (incorporated by reference from the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2003)
Description of fiscal 2007 salary and bonus arrangements for Executive Officers (incorporated by reference from the Current Report
on Form 8-K filed June 22, 2006)
Subsidiaries of Casey’s General Stores, Inc. (incorporated by reference from the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
April 30, 2005)
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Certificate of Robert J. Myers under Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Certificate of William J. Walljasper under Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Certificate of Robert J. Myers under Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Certificate of William J. Walljasper under Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
______________________________
*Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
45
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SIGNATURES
CASEY’S GENERAL STORES, INC.
(Registrant)
Date July 10, 2006
By
/s/ Robert J. Myers
Robert J. Myers, President and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date July 10, 2006
By
/s/ William J. Walljasper
William J. Walljasper
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of
the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Date July 10, 2006
By
/s/ Ronald M. Lamb
Ronald M. Lamb
Chairman of the Board, Director
Date July 10, 2006
By
/s/ John G. Harmon
John G. Harmon
Senior Vice President–Secretary, Director
Date July 10, 2006
By
/s/ Donald F. Lamberti
Donald F. Lamberti
Director
46
Date July 12, 2006
By
/s/ Kenneth H. Haynie
Kenneth H. Haynie
Director
Date July 12, 2006
By
/s/ John R. Fitzgibbon
John R. Fitzgibbon
Director
Date July 10, 2006
By
/s/ Jack P. Taylor
Jack P. Taylor
Director
Date July 11, 2006
By
/s/ Johnny Danos
Johnny Danos
Director
47
The following exhibits are filed herewith:
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No.
Description
23.1
31.1
31.2
32.1
32.2
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Certification of Robert J. Myers under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Certification of William J. Walljasper under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Certificate of Robert J. Myers under Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Certificate of William J. Walljasper under Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
48
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Exhibit 23.1
The Board of Directors
Casey’s General Stores, Inc.:
We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No. 33-19179, 33-42907, and 33-56977) on Form S-8 of Casey’s General Stores,
Inc. of our reports dated July 7, 2006, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Casey’s General Stores, Inc. and subsidiaries as of April 30, 2006
and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
April 30, 2006, and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of April 30, 2006 and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting as of April 30, 2006, which reports appear in the April 30, 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Casey’s General
Stores, Inc. Our report refers to a change in fiscal 2004 to the FIFO method of valuing gasoline inventory.
Des Moines, Iowa
July 12, 2006
KPMG LLP
49
CERTIFICATION OF ROBERT J. MYERS
UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Exhibit 31.1
I, Robert J. Myers, certify that:
1.
2.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Casey’s General Stores, Inc.;
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting practices;
(c)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s
internal control over financial reporting.
Dated July 10, 2006
/s/ Robert J. Myers
Robert J. Myers, President and
Chief Executive Officer
50
CERTIFICATION OF WILLIAM J. WALLJASPER
UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Exhibit 31.2
I, William J. Walljasper, certify that:
1.
2.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Casey’s General Stores, Inc.;
Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed
under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting practices;
(c)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s
fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s
internal control over financial reporting.
Dated July 10, 2006
/s/ William J. Walljasper
William J. Walljasper
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
51
CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Exhibit 32.1
In connection with the Annual Report of Casey’s General Stores, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert J. Myers, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
(1)
(2)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.
/s/ Robert J. Myers
Robert J. Myers, President and
Chief Executive Officer
Dated July 10, 2006
52
CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Exhibit 32.2
In connection with the Annual Report of Casey’s General Stores, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William J. Walljasper, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
(1)
(2)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.
/s/ William J. Walljasper
William J. Walljasper
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Dated July 10, 2006
493484
53
Casey’s Mark of Distinction brands our 1,394 corporate stores in
• Our newly expanded warehouse adds tremendous capacity
9 states and makes our Midwest dominance visible. The number
to our vertically integrated distribution system.
of stores we own is one source of distinction, but setting ourselves
• Seizing opportunities to make wise acquisitions is the key
apart from our peers also comes from having the best people,
source of our growth.
increasing our knowledge, and being proactive.
• An exceptionally strong balance sheet and adequate debt
capacity give us financial flexibility.
There are other marks as well:
• Analysts appreciate our quarterly reports on progress toward
• Our policy of rewarding employees for increasing gross profit
measurable annual goals and the monthly same-store sales
and controlling expenses attracts and retains quality people.
data we post on our Web site.
• Our business thrives on information from our full
point-of-sale technology.
Throughout this annual report, we’ll detail how we exceeded
• We are known for having one of the best proprietary
all of last year’s operations goals and how we’ll capitalize on our
prepared food programs in the industry.
marks of distinction to meet the goals we’ll challenge ourselves
• We use our size to gain advantage in wholesale markets.
with in fiscal 2007.
2
0
0
6
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T
C
A
S
E
Y
’
S
G
E
N
E
R
A
L
S
T
O
R
E
S
,
I
N
C
.
annual report 2006
CASEY’S GENERAL STORES, INC.
CASEY’S GENERAL STORES, INC.
One Convenience Blvd.
Ankeny, Iowa 50021-9437
Mark of Distinction.