Quarterlytics / Consumer Cyclical / Specialty Retail / Casey's General Stores

Casey's General Stores

casy · NASDAQ Consumer Cyclical
Claim this profile
Ticker casy
Exchange NASDAQ
Sector Consumer Cyclical
Industry Specialty Retail
Employees 10,000+
← All annual reports
FY2007 Annual Report · Casey's General Stores
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
C
a
s
e
y
’
s
G
e
n
e
r
a

l

S
t
o
r
e
s
,

I

n
c

.

|

0
7
a
n
n
u
a
l

r
e
p
o
r
t

we’re a convenience store and a whole lot more

Casey’s General Stores, Inc.

One Convenience Blvd.  |  Ankeny, Iowa 50021-9437

07

annual 
report

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
we’re a convenience store 

and a whole lot more

Casey’s and community

At Casey’s, we believe giving is important. 

For us, generosity begins at home—in the 

communities we serve day in and day out. 

Our support is part of our approach to 

store operations and reinforces our 

commitment to our customers and our 

desire to be part of their daily lives. In 

2007, most of our donations went to 

support thousands of local projects and 

events across our marketing territory. 

Sometimes we joined with other businesses 

Our Web site at caseys.com is designed  

Families are the heart of Iowa baseball, 

to sponsor community improvement 

to be a practical tool. Viewers can rely on 

Midwest living, and Casey’s business. 

projects—a new gazebo on the town 

the complete nutritional information we 

They were also at the center of our 

square here, an updated baseball field 

publish regarding every prepared food 

television advertising campaign that 

there, fresh plantings in a park somewhere 

item we serve at our stores. We also use 

features families enjoying great food 

else. Often, we participated in local 

the site to provide quick access to Casey’s 

from a nearby Casey’s store. 

fundraising efforts for student trips or  

financial information, post job openings, 

high school celebrations by serving up 

and invite feedback from customers and 

Whether we’re updating a local library, 

Casey’s pizza and soft drinks for free or  

shareholders. Our CEO Bob Myers reads 

organizing a golf event for charity, or taping 

at discounted prices. 

and responds to every customer comment.

our latest television commercial, we’re 

In addition to financial support, Casey’s 

Casey’s is the 2007 official pizza maker of 

We’ve learned we perform better—and 

employees almost always contributed their 

the Iowa Cubs, our home state’s minor 

feel better—when we help our communities 

own enthusiasm and personal time in 

league baseball team; we’re in the stands 

prosper. That’s why we’re Casey’s, a 

support of their communities. 

and at our kiosks for every home game. 

convenience store and a whole lot more.

serving our shareholders’ interests. 

 
 
In the Midwest, Casey’s General 
Stores, Inc. is a part of life.

Each store is a place where people can start their days 

by picking up a paper, a cup of coffee, and a homemade 

donut; greeting their friends and neighbors; and sharing 

local news. No matter the time of day, when customers 

shop at Casey’s, they find competitively priced gasoline, 

a large variety of quality grocery and other merchandise, 

freshly prepared foods, and friendly employees providing 

excellent service—all in a clean and attractive environment. 

Not only do we support those communities in which 

we do business, but many other communities in our 

07t

annual 
report

a
b
l
e
o
f
c
o
n
t
e
n
t
s

message to shareholders ..............3
management team .........................5
store operations ...............................6
store development ...................... 12
corporate finance ......................... 14
board of directors ......................... 16
investor information .................... 17
financial information ................... 18

operating area as well. Whether it’s by joining with local 

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS         (dollars in thousands, except share data)

groups to promote fund-raising or making contributions 

for town projects, we know it’s sound marketing to help 

communities thrive. When you’re a loyal neighbor, you 

have loyal customers.

We are raising the bar for more sophisticated, higher-caliber 

convenience stores. We’re making the most of innovations 

from full point-of-sale technology to real-time satellite 

communication. We’re known for having one of the best 

proprietary prepared food programs in the industry. We 

have a vertically integrated distribution system with our 

own warehouse, delivery trucks, and gasoline transports 

that adds efficiencies to our operations.

Our customers, their communities, our competitors, and 

our shareholders realize we’re not just a convenience store. 

We’re a whole lot more. 

1,463
15
1,448

07

1,364
25
1,339

05

1,413
19
1,394

06

CASEY’S STORES
❚  total     
❚  franchise     
❚  corporate

$   1.25
$    98.6

06

$   1.26
$   97.7

07

CONTINUING OPERATIONS
❚  eps from continuing operations
❚  net earnings from continuing 
     operations (in millions)

$   0.84
$   67.4

05

Our goals are one of the factors that 

support the cover’s assertion: we’re a 

convenience store and a whole lot more. 

They are performance goals aligned 

with our business model and  

long-term strategic plans.

page 2

message to shareholders

Allow me to begin my first message as 

our stores. Our goal for same-store gallons 

32.2%. By fiscal year-end, same-store sales 

chief executive officer with sincere thanks 

sold was a 2% increase; the actual increase 

were up 4.6%; our margin was 32.7%, 

to our outstanding management team, the 

was 1.4%. 

aided by a one-time benefit related to 

dedicated employees in our stores and at 

cigarettes. Without the one-time benefit, 

our corporate headquarters, the growing 

In fiscal 2007, the retail environment across 

the margin would have been nearly on 

ranks of Casey’s customers, and you in  

our marketing territory held Casey’s 

goal at 32.1%.

the investment community for making 

average margin to 10.4 cents per gallon. 

fiscal 2007 another year of progress for 

The margin was below our goal because we 

Prepared food & fountain continued its 

Casey’s General Stores, Inc. 

adhered to our policy of pricing with the 

momentum to achieve another year of 

competition to avoid giving our customers 

outstanding sales gains. We thought we 

Our goals are one of the factors that support 

a reason to take their business elsewhere.

had set a challenging goal when we  

the cover’s assertion: we’re a convenience store 

called for a 7.9% increase in fiscal 2007 

and a whole lot more. They are performance 

Gasoline customers who came inside our 

same-store sales, but we were too 

goals aligned with our business model and 

doors helped raise fiscal 2007’s inside sales 

conservative. Spurred by the growing 

long-term strategic plans. They identify 

to $1.12 billion, a 12.5% increase following 

popularity of our premier prepared  

benchmarks for enhancing this company’s 

the previous year’s 9.7% rise. Gross profit 

foods, same-store sales grew 11%.

value now and in the future. 

on those sales was up 13.6% to $444.4 

million. We continued to seek new synergies 

The first four goals, same-store sales and 

between the two contributing business 

margin targets in our business categories 

categories: grocery & other merchandise 

as well as containment of operating 

and prepared food & fountain.

expenses, were in place to measure our 

performance of the stores we already 

The performance of our grocery & other 

own. The final goal called for continued 

merchandise category has improved 

execution of Casey’s acquisition strategy. 

significantly over the past three years, and 

we are confident there are more benefits to 

Gasoline, our leading destination item, 

derive from point of sale and our analysis 

drew traffic to our stores again in fiscal 

of the data it provides. Our annual goal 

2007. We sold 1.19 billion gallons at our 

was to build on the previous year’s strong 

pumps, and every gasoline purchase was an 

performance by increasing same-store 

opportunity to sell additional items inside 

sales 3.9% with an average margin of 

page 3

The margin on prepared food & fountain’s 

Our fiscal 2008 goals quantify expectations 

sales was a very profitable 62%. The major 

for building on our 2007 performance: 

reason we missed our 63.4% target was 

the higher cost of goods sold that resulted 

•  Increase same-store gasoline gallons 

from switching to a dual cola program at 

sold 2% with an average margin of 

the end of fiscal 2006. Though the loss of 

10.7 cents per gallon.

our exclusivity contract cost us a little in 

fiscal 2007 margin, having additional 

•  Increase same-store grocery & other 

products in our fountain line-up means  

merchandise sales 4.3% with an average 

we can satisfy more customers year in and 

margin of 32.2%.

year out. By the close of 2007, fountain 

sales were up a remarkable 24%.

•  Increase same-store prepared food & 

fountain sales 8.4% with an average 

Our fourth goal was to hold the percentage 

margin of 62%.

increase in operating expenses to less than 

the percentage increase in gross profit. Our 

•  Hold the percentage increase in 

drop in gasoline margin slowed the 

operating expenses to less than the 

increase in total gross profit to 10.9% 

percentage increase in gross profit.

versus 15.2% in fiscal 2006. Expenses  

rose 13.4% primarily because of a 31.1% 

•  Acquire 50 stores and build 10 stores.

increase in bank fees for customers’ credit 

card charges plus higher wages and utilities.

This annual report will show how we plan 

to meet these goals and how we intend to 

Our fiscal 2007 expansion goal was to 

make sure that no matter how many 

acquire 50 stores and build 10 stores. We 

locations we own, every Casey’s store is  

actually acquired 52 and built 8. The 33 

a convenience store and a whole lot more.

HandiMart stores we purchased in October 

helped us exceed our acquisition target 

and served our priority of purchasing 

good sites that will flourish under our 

Robert J. Myers

business model. During the past three 

President and Chief Executive Officer

fiscal years we have added a total of 148 

stores through acquisition. 

page 4

          
 
management team

Robert C. Ford
VP-Store Operations

Russell D. Sukut
VP-Treasurer

Cleo R. Kuhns
VP-Real Estate-Store 
Development

William J. Walljasper
Senior VP & CFO

Hal D. Brown
VP-Support Services

Terry W. Handley
COO

Darryl F. Bacon
VP-Food Services

Robert J. 
Myers
President  
& CEO

Eli J. Wirtz
VP-Corporate 
Counsel

Michael R. 
Richardson
VP-Marketing

Sam J. Billmeyer
Senior VP-Transportation  
& Support Operations

John G. Harmon
Senior VP & Secretary

Bradley G. Heyer 
VP-Information Systems

Julia L. Jackowski
VP-Human Resources

page 5

store operations

We choose to be more than a convenience 

“Every year we get better at drawing 

store because consumers in the Midwest 

traffic inside our stores and converting  

communities we serve need us to be more. 

that traffic to gross profit,” said Chief 

In some of the smallest towns, we’re the 

Operating Officer Terry Handley. In fiscal 

only place to buy groceries and prepared 

2007, same-store inside sales were up 6% 

foods. In others, we are the preferred 

and total inside sales rose 12.5% to $1.12 

choice because our stores are inviting, our 

billion. Gross profit on inside sales 

prices are reasonable, we have what local 

increased 13.6% to reach $444.4 million. 

shoppers are looking for, and we make 

We’ll show you how we achieved the 

ourselves part of community life.

improvements and how we plan to make 

those totals grow in fiscal 2008.

page 6

gasoline

Our approach to this business category is 

“We are proficient at purchasing and 

straightforward. We attract customers by 

delivering gasoline, but the retail 

making sure we have the gasoline they 

environment has a significant impact  

4.4 %
11.5 ¢ 

06

05

want at a price they can’t beat locally. We 

on our bottom line,” said Sam Billmeyer, 

make the purchase easy and quick with 

Senior Vice President–Transportation & 

pay at the pump. Customers can use almost 

Support Operations. In fiscal 2006, sales 

GASOLINE
❚  same-store sales (gallons)     
❚  margin

any recognized credit card, including 

and margins were extraordinarily high, 

1.9 %
10.8 ¢ 

  1.4 %
10.4     

07

Casey’s own co-branded MasterCard.  

and our results were also extraordinary—

same-store gallons sold 2% with a margin 

We canopy our service areas for comfort 

we increased gasoline gross profit 15.2% 

of 10.8 cents. Same-store gallons sold were 

and light them for safety.

to $125.4 million. 

up 1.4%, contributing to a 9.1% increase 

in total gallons sold, and the average 

We price with the local competition, 

Conditions were less favorable in fiscal 

margin was 10.4 cents. As a result, 

whether in the next block or the next  

2007. Gasoline sales were slow primarily 

gasoline gross profit was down 1.1% to 

town, because if we lose customers over 

due to high retail prices throughout the 

$124.1 million.

our gasoline price, we may never see them 

Midwest during the spring and summer, 

again. “We’ll accept some margin volatility  

usually our busiest months. In the fall and 

We are confident that we’ll increase  

so we can draw the customers inside our 

winter, competitors kept retail prices low 

same-store gallons sold 2% by April 30, 

stores. That’s where we generate over 75%  

relative to wholesale costs, and we priced 

2008. We lowered the margin goal to 10.7 

of Casey’s gross profit,” said Handley. In 

right along with them. Though both sales 

cents per gallon because we know we’ll 

recent years, quarterly margins generally 

and margin improved in the fourth 

likely lose some state tax credits on ethanol 

have varied from about 9 cents to roughly 

quarter, we didn’t gain enough ground to 

we sell in Iowa. We were pleased that 

12 cents per gallon for a historical annual 

meet the goal for this category— increase 

retail prices were more responsive to rising 

average of 10.8 cents. 

wholesale costs during the last three  

months of fiscal 2007 and hope the  

pattern continues.

1,094
$ 767
$ 229

06

SALES (in millions)
❚  gasoline (gallons)     
❚  grocery & other merchandise     
❚  prepared food & fountain

    1,194
$ 853
$ 267

07

1,010
$ 704
$ 204

05

$ 125.4
$ 247.0
$ 144.0

06

GROSS PROFIT (in millions)
❚  gasoline     
❚  grocery & other merchandise     
❚  prepared food & fountain

$ 124.1
$ 278.7
$ 165.8

$ 108.9
$ 219.1
$ 123.2

07

05

page 7

 
 
 
grocery & other 
merchandise

We’ve been selling groceries as long as 

Cigarettes were a profitable destination item 

we’ve been selling gasoline. We offer a 

in fiscal 2007, and POS data helped us 

large and varied array of products—and 

match rack space to customer preferences 

everything in a given store from cigarettes, 

and keep tight control of inventory. 

seasonal items, and energy drinks to dairy 

Available in most of our stores since late in 

products, beer, and Casey’s branded 

fiscal 2005, lottery tickets produced a 

bottled water is stocked and arranged to 

double-digit increase in ticket sales during 

match that store’s customer demand. 

the year just ended. We profited most from 

increased store traffic and higher inside 

All products carry SKU numbers for instant 

sales, but we also earned commission on 

sales and inventory information that lets 

the tickets we sold. The commission is 

us respond quickly to changing habits. For 

accounted for separately and is not 

instance, in the last fiscal year energy 

included in the grocery & other 

drinks became more popular. In response, 

merchandise category results.

Casey’s doubled the shelf space allotted to 

this product. 

Heavier store traffic, better inventory 

management, and a one-time benefit 

“The ability to address customer needs 

related to cigarettes contributed to a 12.8% 

store by store is the most visible benefit 

improvement in the category’s gross profit. 

we’ve gained from our investment in point 

Total sales rose 11.1% with a margin of 

of sale and related technologies,” said 

32.7%. As you know we exceeded our 3.9% 

Mike Richardson, Vice President–

same-store sales target with a 4.6% 

Marketing. As we begin fiscal 2008, we 

improvement, and even without the  

have at least twelve months of sales data 

one-time benefit we would have been  

from every established Casey’s store. 

only slightly off our 32.2% margin  

Thanks to our data-mining software, the 

target at 32.1%. 

management team can select and sort the 

information they need to meet customer 

In fiscal 2008, we’ll refine efficiencies and 

demand and make decisions that will 

further improve the match between product 

increase gross profit.

mix and customer demand at each Casey’s 

store. We expect to extend the category’s 

upward gross profit trend by increasing 

same-store sales 4.3% and achieving an 

average margin of 32.2%. 

08GOAL

06

5.7 %
32.2 %

GROCERY & OTHER
MERCHANDISE
❚  increase in same-store sales    
❚  margin

4.6 %
32.7 %

07

4.8 %
31.1 %

05

page 8

4.3 %32.2 %page 9

prepared food  
& fountain

Fiscal 2007 total sales were up 17%, and 

gross profit rose 15.1%. “The best thing 

about this category is its consistent 

improvement,” Handley said. “Gross 

profit has risen 34% over the past three 

fiscal years, and there’s still plenty of 

growing to do.”

There are two keys to the remarkable 

results we’re obtaining: Casey’s superior 

proprietary prepared food program and 

leaders at the corporate and store levels 

who make this dynamic program work 

wherever we implement it.

“Planning is vital in our business,” said 

Darryl Bacon, Vice President–Food 

Services, “but it counts for nothing if no 

one executes. We have competent store 

managers who are committed to making 

the most of our proprietary food program, 

and we give these managers lots of support.” 

Executing our plans in the year just ended 

gave us our third consecutive year of 

double-digit sales growth.  Same-store 

sales were up 11%.

7.4 %
63.0 %

06

08GOAL

PREPARED FOOD & FOUNTAIN
❚  increase in same-store sales    
❚  margin

11.0 %
62.0 %

07

8.4 %
60.4 %

05

page 10

8.4 %62.0 %Pizza and our other popular hot foods 

sold and was the primary reason we fell 

We’ve targeted an 8.4% same-store sales 

accounted for 65% of prepared food & 

short of our 63.4% margin goal at 62%.  

increase in fiscal 2008 because we’re again 

fountain sales. In fiscal 2007, we sold nearly 

It was a small price to pay for the significant 

expecting some leveling in the rate of 

8.5 million made-from-scratch pizzas and

gains made in sales and gross profit. 

growth we’ve achieved during the past 

more fountain drinks than ever before. We 

several years. Assuming we meet our sales 

expanded our to-go-cup offerings to include 

Bacon credits our POS technology for 

mark, a 62% margin will produce the 

pizza bites, systematically rotated product 

improving the management of Casey’s 

outstanding gross profit improvement  

to meet seasonal demands and keep customer 

kitchens: “Tracking daily sales counts tells 

we’ve come to expect from this category. 

interest high, made some price adjustments, 

us what to stock our kitchens with and lets 

and heightened prepared food & fountain’s 

us know the inventory that should be on 

As we did last year, we’ll work for 

visibility inside our stores.

hand every hour of every day. We use the 

continuous improvement in all three  

same information to set work schedules.” 

of our business categories. The more 

Fountain sales—and ultimately total inside 

Right now, we’re learning to apply the 

complex our operations become, the 

sales—benefited substantially from the dual 

data to help store managers cut stales by 

harder—and more exciting—it is to 

cola program introduced at the end of fiscal 

proactively adjusting their daily kitchen 

achieve consistent gains. We’ll execute 

2006. We attracted customers who wanted 

plans in response to weather or other  

for success because we’re Casey’s, 

a Pepsi, Dr. Pepper, or Mountain Dew. They 

local conditions that affect sales.

a convenience store and a whole lot more. 

bought the drink and often a slice of pizza 

or chicken tenders to go with it. Our sales 

Certainly we’re relying on POS data to 

growth is proving that if these customers 

help us manage the recently acquired stores 

try our prepared food once, they’ll be  

that are in transition to the Casey’s system, 

back for more. 

especially where we’ve added kitchens. 

Integrating our proprietary prepared food 

As a result of adding new fountain 

program with the menus of fast-food 

products, we no longer benefited from our 

restaurants already under contract at some 

previous exclusivity arrangement with 

of the HandiMart locations will require 

Coca-Cola. This raised the cost of goods 

new data and new applications. 

page 11

store development

One of the ways Casey’s stands out a 

We expect further acquisition activity 

whole lot more is growing primarily by 

within the industry during fiscal 2008  

acquisition. Prior to fiscal 2003, we 

for three reasons: Profit margins will be 

achieved our growth by constructing 

thinner for the prime items of gasoline  

several new stores each year and by 

and cigarettes, making it more difficult  

purchasing a few of our franchise 

for smaller operators to compete. There 

stores—arguably a type of acquisition.

will be an increased drive toward 

consolidation. Financing availability  

Senior Vice President John Harmon, who 

should be favorable.

leads our acquisition team, said, “In terms 

of sales and profits, newly constructed 

“Having our own distribution center is an 

stores matured in three to five years. 

enormous advantage for operating our 

Acquired stores contribute much more 

stores profitably,” Harmon stated, “and  

quickly due to the existing customer base 

we have the capacity to serve 1,000 more 

and trained employees.”

stores out of our warehouse.” We believe 

we’ll acquire those stores primarily in our 

Our goal for fiscal 2007 was to acquire  

nine-state marketing territory. The right 

50 stores and build 10. We completed 8 

kind of opportunity will lead us outside 

new constructions and acquired 52 stores. 

of the nine states. Concentration will be 

“Foremost among them were the 33 

the key.

HandiMart locations we purchased in  

the second quarter,” said Harmon.

Our goal for fiscal 2008 is to acquire 50 

stores and build 10 stores. As we pursue 

We were in no rush to rebrand the 

attractive acquisitions, we will adhere to 

HandiMart stores because it was a strong 

our business model of focusing on the 

name in a concentrated area. Of course 

small-town customer, the potential 

we believe our own brand is stronger, and 

contribution to earnings, and the 

we will complete the brand transition  

estimated return on invested capital.

as we add kitchens for our proprietary 

prepared food program to the appropriate 

During next year, we can be counted 

locations in the coming months.

on to apply new efficiencies as we pursue 

our acquisition goal. Hitting the exact 

number counts less than making sure 

our growth is disciplined growth.

15
67 06

08GOAL

STORE GROWTH
❚  new-store constructions    
❚  acquisitions

8
52

07

12
29

05

37

98

90

10

413

371 60

104

280

total number of stores
1,463

page 12

1050page 13

corporate finance

“We believe in setting quantifiable annual 

goals and publishing quarterly progress 

toward them as well as posting monthly 

same-store sales data for our three 

business categories,” stated investor 

relations contact, Chief Financial Officer 

Bill Walljasper. “We are as transparent 

as possible.”

At April 30, 2007, cash and cash equivalents 

totaled $107.1 million, a 42% increase 

from the previous fiscal year-end. Our 

long-term debt net of current maturities 

increased $93 million to $199.5 million, 

and the average total debt to average total 

capital ratio rose to 27%. Shareholders’ 

equity grew 9.4% to $572.3 million.

The larger long-term debt and the 

corresponding debt to capital ratio 

are positive measures of us positioning 

ourselves to take advantage of opportunities. 

Walljasper stated, “In September of 2006, 

we completed a $100 million private 

placement to fund acquisition activity. 

We used $50 million for the HandiMart 

acquisition; the remaining $50 million  

was part of a delayed drawdown we 

FISCAL 2008 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES BUDGET 

page 14

took in March to fund acquisitions in 

fiscal 2008. The private placement 

had a favorable rate of 5.72% and was 

oversubscribed—a testament to Casey’s 

financial strength and ability to fund 

future operational activities. We still have 

plenty of debt capacity should additional 

opportunities arise.”

10.9 %
13.4 %

07

8.8 %
7.6 %

05

15.3 %
10.7 %

06

OPERATING EXPENSES
❚  gross profit increase    
❚  operating expense increase

106.5
523.2

06

123.1
469.8

05

199.5
572.3

07

CAPITAL STRUCTURE (in millions)
❚  long-term debt    
❚  equity

We’ve set our capital expenditure budget 

remodels of the Gas ‘N Shop stores.” 

of operational and marketing decisions 

for fiscal 2008. We’re planning to spend 

on the components over which we have 

about $72 million for acquisitions and 

CEO Bob Myers reported that we didn’t 

the most control. We’ll save approximately 

new-store constructions, approximately 

achieve our goal of holding the percentage 

$1 million by doing credit card clearing 

$50 million on remodels and replacements, 

increase in operating expenses to less than 

in house.

and around $5 million each on technology 

the percentage increase in gross profit. 

and transportation updates.

Several factors had a negative impact: the 

We will continue sharing the specifics of our 

reduction in gross profit contribution from 

financial performance with investors so 

We know there’s great interest in the return 

the gasoline category, the increased costs 

they can track our evolving Company 

on invested capital. Our ROIC for fiscal 

for wages and utilities, and the significant 

story. It’s one more way of being a 

2007 was 9.4%, down from fiscal 2006’s 

rise in operating expenses related to an 

convenience store and a whole lot more.

due to the additional $100 million of debt, 

$8.2 million jump in credit card fees.

the smaller gas margin, and a one-time 

accounting adjustment under the SEC’s 

Myers also said we have the same goal for 

Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108. “I’m 

fiscal 2008: to hold the percentage increase 

confident,” Walljasper said, “we’ll see 

in operating expenses to less than the 

incremental earnings growth in fiscal 

percentage increase in gross profit. During 

2008 from the kitchen additions to the 

the year, we’ll concentrate on total inside 

HandiMart stores and the finished 

gross profit dollars to measure the effect 

page 15

board of directors

Ronald M. Lamb
Chairman of Casey’s General Stores, Inc.

Donald F. Lamberti
Retired Chairman of Casey’s  
General Stores, Inc.

Robert J. Myers
President & CEO of Casey’s 
General Stores, Inc.

Kenneth H. Haynie
Of counsel to the law firm of  
Ahlers & Cooney, P.C.

William C. Kimball* 
Retired Chairman and CEO of Medicap 
Pharmacy, Inc.

Johnny Danos* 
President of the Greater Des Moines 
Community Foundation

John R. Fitzgibbon*
Self-employed Financial and Operational 
Consultant, Des Moines

Patricia Clare Sullivan*
Retired CEO & President of Mercy Health 
Center, Central Iowa, Des Moines

Casey’s newest director, Diane C. Bridgewater, was  

appointed by the Board on March 6, 2007 to serve 

until she stands for election at the annual meeting. 

She is CFO and Treasurer of  Life Care Services, LLC, 

a manager and developer of  continuing care retirement

communities. Previously, she was with Pioneer Hi-Bred, 

most recently (2006) as Vice President and CFO.

Diane C. Bridgewater*

* member of audit committee

 Jack P. Taylor

We express a sense of  loss at the death of  Jack P. Taylor, a director 

since 1993. Jack took pride in his role on the Board. As Chairman 

and CEO of  his own company, a Des Moines-based general 

contractor, he shared a valued perspective on numerous aspects  

of  Casey’s. We’ll miss his insight and his energy.

page 16

investor information

common stock 
Casey’s General Stores, Inc. common  
stock trades on the Nasdaq Global 
Select Market under the symbol CASY. 
The 50.6 million shares of  common stock  
outstanding at April 30, 2007 had a market 
value of  $1.3 billion. As of  that same date, 
there were 2,551 shareholders of  record.

common stock market prices
Calendar 2005     $  High           $  Low

1st  Quarter 

2nd Quarter 

3rd Quarter 

4th  Quarter 

19.67 

20.86   

23.25   

26.09 

15.98

16.53

19.33

20.19

Calendar 2006     $  High           $  Low

1st  Quarter 

2nd Quarter 

3rd Quarter 

4th  Quarter 

27.20 

25.57 

25.99  

26.00  

22.02

20.15

21.01

21.19  

Calendar 2007     $  High           $  Low

1st  Quarter 

2nd Quarter 

26.70 

29.46 

23.49

24.76

On June 28, 2007, the last reported sales 

price of  the Company’s common stock was 

$27.70 per share. On that same date, the 

market cap was $1.4 billion.

dividends
The Company began paying cash dividends 

investor inquiries
Current or prospective Casey’s General 

during fiscal 1991. The dividends paid in 

Stores, Inc. investors can receive annual 

fiscal 2007 totaled $0.20 per share. At  

reports, proxy statements, Forms 10-K 

its June meeting, the Board of  Directors 

and 10-Q, and earnings announcements 

increased the quarterly dividend to $0.065 

at no cost by calling (515) 965-6107 or 

per share. The dividend is payable on 

sending written requests to the 

August 15, 2007 to shareholders of   

following address:

record on August 1, 2007.

dividend reinvestment  
and stock purchase plan
This plan, introduced in the fall of  1998, 

gives holders of  Casey’s General Stores, Inc. 

common stock a convenient and economical 

way of  purchasing additional shares at 

market prices by reinvesting their dividends 

in full or in part. Stockholders may also 

take advantage of  the cash payment option 

to purchase additional shares. Those 

wishing to enroll should contact the 

transfer agent and registrar: 

Securities Transfer Division 

UMB Bank, n.a.  

P.O. Box 410064

Kansas City, Missouri  64141

Casey’s General Stores, Inc.

One Convenience Blvd.

Ankeny, Iowa  50021

Corporate information, including 

monthly same-store sales data for the 

Company’s three business categories,  

is also available at www.caseys.com. 

Quarterly conference calls are broadcast 

live over the Internet via the Investor 

Relations Web page and made available 

in archived format. Broadcast times for 

the quarterly calls will be announced on 

the Web page and in corresponding 

press releases.

annual meeting
All shareholders and prospective 

investors are cordially invited to attend 

the annual meeting at 9:00 a.m., 

September 14, 2007 at the corporate 

headquarters in Ankeny, Iowa.

page 17
page 17

 
 
FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I 

ITEM 1. 

Business ..........................................................................................................................................3

ITEM 1A. 

Risk Factors ....................................................................................................................................8

ITEM 1B.  Unresolved Staff  Comments ........................................................................................................12

ITEM 2.  

Properties .....................................................................................................................................12

ITEM 3.  

Legal Proceedings ........................................................................................................................12

ITEM 4.  

Submission of  Matters to a Vote of  Security Holders .................................................................13

PART II 

ITEM 5.  

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, 
and Issuer Purchases of  Equity Securities....................................................................................13

ITEM 6.  

Selected Financial Data  ..............................................................................................................15

ITEM 7.  

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of  Financial  
Condition and Results of  Operations ..........................................................................................16

ITEM 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk .....................................................23

ITEM 8. 

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data ..........................................................................24

ITEM 9. 

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants
on Accounting and Financial Disclosure .....................................................................................47

ITEM 9A. 

Controls and Procedures ..............................................................................................................47

ITEM 9B.  Other Information .......................................................................................................................47

PART III 

ITEM 10. 

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance ..........................................................48

ITEM 11. 

Executive Compensation .............................................................................................................48

ITEM 12. 

Security Ownership of  Certain Beneficial Owners
and Management and Related Stockholder Matters ...................................................................48

ITEM 13. 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions,
Directive Independence ...............................................................................................................48

ITEM 14. 

Principal Accountant Fees and Services .......................................................................................48

PART IV 

ITEM 15. 

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules ...............................................................................49

page 18

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  United States

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

Annual Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of

the Securities Exchange Act of  1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended April 30, 2007

Commission File Number 0-12788

CASEY’S GENERAL STORES, INC.

(Exact name of  registrant as specified in its charter)

IOWA  

(State or other jurisdiction of  

incorporation or organization) 

42-0935283

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification Number)

ONE CONVENIENCE BLVD., ANKENY, IOWA

(Address of  principal executive offices)

50021

(Zip Code)

(515) 965-6100

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of  the Act

COMMON STOCK

(Title of  Class)

COMMON SHARE PURCHASE RIGHTS

(Title of  Class)

Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of  the Act

NONE

page 1

 
 
 
Indicate by check mark if  the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of  the Securities Act.   

Yes   [X]    No   [   ]

Indicate by check mark if  the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of  the 

Exchange Act.   Yes   [   ]    No   [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of  the 

Securities Exchange Act of  1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to 

file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   Yes   [X]    No   [   ]

Indicate by check mark if  disclosure of  delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of  Regulation S-K is not contained 

herein, and will not be contained, to the best of  registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incor-

porated by reference in Part III of  this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.   [   ] 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.  

Large accelerated filer   [X]    Accelerated filer   [   ]    Non-accelerated filer   [   ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of  the Exchange Act).       

Yes   [   ]    No   [X]

The aggregate market value of  the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of  the registrant on June 14, 2007, 

computed by reference to the closing sales price ($24.27 per share) as quoted on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on the last 

business day of  the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter (October 31, 2006), was $1,150,322,812.

Indicate the number of  shares outstanding of  each of  the issuer’s class of  common stock, as of  the latest practicable date.

Class 

Outstanding at June 14, 2007 

________________________________ 

________________________________    

Common Stock, no par value per share 

 50,613,712 shares

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of  the following documents, as set forth herein, are incorporated by reference into the listed Parts and Items of  

this report on Form 10-K:

1. 

Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the Annual 

Meeting of  Shareholders to be held on September 14, 2007 (Item 5 of  Part II and Items 10, 11, 12, 13, and 15 of  Part III).

page 2

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PART I

ITEM 1. 

BUSINESS

The Company

Casey’s General Stores, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries (the Company/Casey’s/we) operate convenience stores 

under the name “Casey’s General Store” in 9 Midwest states, primarily Iowa, Missouri, and Illinois. The stores carry a broad  
selection of  food (including freshly prepared foods such as pizza, donuts, and sandwiches), beverages, tobacco products, health 
and beauty aids, automotive products, and other nonfood items. In addition, all stores offer gasoline for sale on a self-service  
basis. On April 30, 2007, there were a total of  1,463 Casey’s General Stores in operation, of  which 1,448 were operated by the 
Company (Corporate Stores) and 15 stores were operated by franchisees (Franchise Stores). There were 8 Corporate Stores  
newly constructed and 52 acquired stores opened in fiscal 2007. There were no Franchise Stores newly opened in fiscal 2007.  
We operate a central warehouse, Casey’s distribution center, adjacent to our corporate headquarters in Ankeny, Iowa, through 
which we supply grocery and general merchandise items to Corporate and Franchise Stores.

Approximately 61% of  all Casey’s General Stores are located in areas with populations of  fewer than 5,000 persons, 
while approximately 13% of  all stores are located in communities with populations exceeding 20,000 persons. The Company 
competes on the basis of  price as well as on the basis of  traditional features of  convenience store operations such as location, 
extended hours, and quality of  service.

Casey’s, with executive offices at One Convenience Blvd., Ankeny, Iowa 50021-8045 (telephone 515-965-6100) was 

incorporated in Iowa in 1967. Two of  our subsidiaries, Casey’s Marketing Company (Marketing Company) and Casey’s Services 
Company (Services Company), also operate from the corporate headquarters facility and were incorporated in Iowa in March 
1995. A third subsidiary, Casey’s Retail Company, was incorporated in Iowa in 2004 and also operates from these facilities.

The Company’s Internet address is www.caseys.com. Each year we make available through our Web site current reports 

on Form 8-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q , our annual report on Form 10-K, and amendments to those reports free of   
charge as soon as reasonably practicable after they have been electronically filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 
Additionally, you can go to our Web site to read our Financial Code of  Ethics and Code of  Conduct; we intend to post disclosure 
of  any waivers to the Codes to the extent such disclosure is legally required.

General

Casey’s General Stores seek to meet the needs of  residents of  small towns by combining features of  both general  

store and convenience store operations. Smaller communities often are not served by national-chain convenience stores. We have 
succeeded at operating Casey’s General Stores in small towns by offering, at competitive prices, a broader selection of  products 
than does a typical convenience store.

In each of  the past two fiscal years, we derived over 97% of  our gross profits from retail sales by Corporate Stores. We 

also derived income from continuing monthly royalties based on sales by Franchise Stores; wholesale sales to Franchise Stores;  
sign and façade rental fees; and the provision of  certain maintenance, transportation, and construction services to our franchisees. 
Our sales historically have been strongest during the first and second fiscal quarters (May through October) and relatively  
weaker during the third and fourth. In warmer weather, customers tend to purchase greater quantities of  gasoline and certain 
convenience items such as beer, soft drinks, and ice. 

page 3

 
 
Corporate Subsidiaries

The Marketing Company and the Services Company were organized as Iowa corporations in March 1995, and both 

are wholly owned subsidiaries of  Casey’s. Casey’s Retail Company was organized as an Iowa corporation in April 2004 and is  

also a wholly owned subsidiary of  Casey’s.

Casey’s Retail Company operates Corporate Stores in Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Nebraska, and South Dakota; it  

also holds the rights to the Casey’s trademark and trade name and serves as franchisor in connection with the operation of   

Franchise Stores. The Marketing Company owns and has responsibility for the operation of  Corporate Stores in Iowa, Missouri,  

Wisconsin, and Indiana. The Marketing Company also has responsibility for all of  our wholesale operations, including the  

distribution center. The Services Company provides a variety of  construction and transportation services for all Corporate Stores.

First Heartland Captive Insurance Company (First Heartland) was incorporated in April 2004 in Arizona and was a 

wholly owned subsidiary of  Casey’s until being dissolved December 2006. First Heartland operated as a single-parent deductible 

reimbursement captive insurance company based in Phoenix, Arizona. First Heartland provided general liability, automobile  

liability, and workers’ compensation insurance coverages to the Retail Company, the Marketing Company, and the Services Company.

Store Operations

Products Offered 

Each Casey’s General Store typically carries over 3,000 food and nonfood items. The products offered are those  

normally found in a supermarket, except that the stores do not sell produce or fresh meats and selection is generally limited to  
one or two well-known brands of  each item stocked. Most of  our staple foodstuffs are nationally advertised brands. Stores sell  
regional brands of  dairy and bakery products, and approximately 88% of  the stores offer beer. Our nonfood items include 
 tobacco products, health and beauty aids, school supplies, housewares, pet supplies, photo supplies, and automotive products.

All Casey’s General Stores offer gasoline or gasohol for sale on a self-service basis. The gasoline and gasohol generally 

are sold under the Casey’s name, although some Franchise Stores sell gasoline under a major oil company brand.

It is our policy to experiment with additions to the Company’s product line, especially products with higher gross profit 

margins. As a result, we had added various prepared food items to our product line over the years, facilitated by the installation 
of  snack centers, which now are in most Corporate Stores. The snack centers sell sandwiches, fountain drinks, and other items 
that have gross profit margins higher than those of  general staple goods. As of  April 30, 2007, the Company was selling donuts 
prepared on store premises in approximately 98% of  its stores in addition to cookies, brownies, Danish rolls, cinnamon rolls, and 
muffins. The Company installs donut-making facilities in all newly constructed stores.

We began marketing made-from-scratch pizza in 1984, expanding its availability to 1,381 Corporate Stores (95%) as 

of  April 30, 2007. Although pizza is our most popular prepared food offering, we continue to expand our prepared food product 
line, which now includes ham and cheese sandwiches, pork and chicken fritters, sausage sandwiches, chicken tenders, popcorn 
chicken, sub sandwiches, pizza bites, breakfast croissants and biscuits, breakfast pizza, hash browns, quarter-pound hamburgers 
and cheeseburgers, hot dogs, and potato cheese bites.

The growth in our proprietary prepared food program reflects management’s strategy to promote high-margin products 

that are compatible with convenience store operations. In the last three fiscal years, retail sales of  nongasoline items have generated 
about 30% of  our retail sales, but they have resulted in approximately 75% of  our gross profits from retail sales. Gross profit  
margins on prepared food items averaged approximately 62% during the same thirty-six months—significantly higher than the 
gross profit margin on retail sales of  gasoline, which averaged approximately 5%.

page 4

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Store Design

Casey’s General Stores are freestanding and, with a few exceptions to accommodate local conditions, conform to 
standard construction specifications. During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2007, the aggregate investment in land, building, 
equipment, and initial inventory for a typical newly constructed Corporate Store averaged approximately $1.4 million. The standard 
building designed by the Company is a pre-engineered steel frame building mounted on a concrete slab. The current store design  
measures 40 feet by 68 feet with approximately 1,300 square feet devoted to sales area, 500 square feet to kitchen space, and 500 square 
feet to storage and 2 large public restrooms. Store lots have sufficient frontage and depth to permit adequate drive-in parking facilities 
on one or more sides of  each store. Each store typically includes 3 or 4 islands of  gasoline dispensers and storage tanks with capacity for 
24,000 to 36,000 gallons of  gasoline. The merchandising display follows a standard layout designed to encourage a flow of  customer 
traffic through all sections of  every store. All stores are air-conditioned and have modern refrigeration equipment. Nearly all the store 
locations feature our bright red and yellow pylon sign and façade, both of  which display Casey’s name and service mark.

All Casey’s General Stores remain open at least sixteen hours per day, seven days a week. Most store locations are open 

from 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., although hours of  operation may be adjusted on a store-by-store basis to accommodate customer 
traffic patterns. We require that all stores maintain a bright, clean interior and provide prompt checkout service. It is our policy 
not to permit the installation of  electronic games or sale of  adult magazines on store premises.

Store Locations

The Company traditionally has located its stores in small towns not served by national-chain convenience stores.  

Management believes that a Casey’s General Store provides a service not otherwise available in small towns and that a convenience 

store in an area with limited population can be profitable if  it stresses sales volume and competitive prices. Our store site selection 

criteria emphasize the population of  the immediate area and daily highway traffic volume. Where there is no competing store, we 

can often operate profitably at a highway location in a community with a population of  as few as 500.

page 5

  
 
 
 
Gasoline Operations

Gasoline sales are an important part of  our revenue and earnings. Approximately 72% of  Casey’s net sales for the year 

ended April 30, 2007 were derived from the retail sale of  gasoline. The following table summarizes gasoline sales by Corporate 
Stores for the three fiscal years ended April 30, 2007:

Number of  gallons sold

Total retail gasoline sales

Percentage of  net sales

Gross profit percentage

Average retail price per gallon

Average gross profit margin per gallon
Average number of  gallons sold per 
  Corporate Store*

Year ended April 30,

2007

2006

2005

1,193,554,420

1,093,574,969

1,009,936,695

$

2,881,054,152

$

2,478,733,751

$

1,858,094,798

71.6%

4.3%

$2.41

10.40¢

821,057

71.0%

5.1%

$2.27

11.47¢

806,221

66.7%

5.9%

$1.84

10.78¢

781,930

_____________________________
*Includes only those stores in operation at least one full year before commencement of  the periods indicated.

Retail prices of  gasoline increased during the year ended April 30, 2007. The total number of  gallons we sold during 
this period also increased, primarily because of  the higher number of  Corporate Stores in operation and our efforts to price our 
retail gasoline to compete in local market areas. For additional information concerning the Company’s gasoline operations, see 
Item 7 herein.

Distribution and Wholesale Arrangements

The Marketing Company supplies all Corporate Stores and all Franchise Stores with groceries, food, health and beauty 

aids, and general merchandise from our distribution center. The stores place orders for merchandise through a telecommunications 
link-up to the computer at our headquarters in Ankeny, and we fill the orders with weekly shipments in Company-owned delivery trucks. 
The Marketing Company charges Franchise Stores processing and shipping fees for each order our distribution center fills. All of  our 
existing and proposed stores are within the distribution center’s optimum efficiency range—a radius of  approximately 500 miles.

The Marketing Company’s only wholesale sales are to Franchise Stores, to which it sells groceries; prepared sandwiches; 

ingredients and supplies for donuts, sandwiches, and pizza; health and beauty aids; general merchandise; and gasoline. Although 
we derive income from this activity, we provide these products, particularly gasoline, at narrow profit margins to promote  
competitiveness and increase sales to Franchise Stores.

In fiscal 2007, we purchased directly from manufacturers approximately 90% of  the food and nonfood items sold from 

our distribution center. It is our practice, with few exceptions, not to contract with any of  the suppliers of  products sold by Casey’s  
General Stores. We believe the practice is customary in the industry and enables us to respond flexibly to changing market conditions.

page 6

Franchise Operations

We have been franchising Casey’s General Stores since 1970. In addition to generating income, franchising historically 

enabled us to obtain desirable store locations from owners who preferred to become franchisees rather than to sell or lease their 
locations. Franchising also enabled us to expand our system of  stores at a faster rate, thereby achieving operating efficiencies in  
our warehouse and distribution system as well as stronger identification in our marketing territory. As the Company has grown and 
strengthened its financial resources, franchising has become less advantageous for us. In recent years we have acquired a number of  
Franchise Stores through lease or purchase. As of  April 30, 2007, there were a total of  11 franchisees operating 15 Franchise Stores.

All franchisees currently pay us a royalty fee equal to 3% of  gross receipts derived from total store sales excluding 

gasoline, subject to a minimum monthly royalty of  $300. We currently assess a royalty fee of  $0.018 per gallon on gasoline sales, 
although we have discretion to increase this amount to 3% of  retail gasoline sales. In addition, franchisees pay Casey’s a sign  
and façade rental fee. The franchise agreements do not authorize us to establish the prices to be charged by franchisees. Further, 
except with respect to certain supplies and items provided in connection with the opening of  each store, each franchisee has  
unlimited authority to purchase supplies and inventory from any supplier, provided the products meet our quality standards.  
Franchise agreements typically contain a noncompetition clause that restricts the franchisee’s ability to operate a  
convenience-style store in a specified area for a period of  two or three years following termination of  the agreement.

Personnel

On April 30, 2007, we had 6,954 full-time employees and 10,182 part-time employees. We have not experienced any 

work stoppages. There are no collective bargaining agreements between the Company and any of  its employees.

Competition

Our business is highly competitive. Food, including prepared foods, and nonfood items similar or identical to those 

sold by the Company are generally available from various competitors in the communities served by Casey’s General Stores. We 
believe our stores located in small towns compete principally with other local grocery and convenience stores; similar retail outlets; 
and, to a lesser extent, prepared food outlets, restaurants, and expanded gasoline stations offering a more limited selection of   
grocery and food items for sale. Stores located in more heavily populated communities may compete with local and national  
grocery and drug store chains, expanded gasoline stations, supermarkets, discount food stores, and traditional convenience stores.  
Convenience store chains competing in the larger towns served by Casey’s General Stores include 7-Eleven, Quik Trip, Kwik 
Trip, and regional chains. Some of  the Company’s competitors have greater financial and other resources than we do. These 
competitive factors are discussed further in Item 7 of  this Form 10-K.

Service Marks

The name “Casey’s General Store” and the service mark consisting of  the Casey’s design logo (with the words “Casey’s 
General Store”) are our registered service marks under federal law. We believe these service marks are of  material importance in 
promoting and advertising the Company’s business.

page 7

 
Government Regulation

The United States Environmental Protection Agency and several states, including Iowa, have established requirements 

for owners and operators of  underground gasoline storage tanks (USTs) with regard to (i) maintenance of  leak detection, corrosion 

protection, and overfill/spill protection systems; (ii) upgrade of  existing tanks; (iii) actions required in the event of  a detected leak; 

(iv) prevention of  leakage through tank closings; and (v) required gasoline inventory recordkeeping. Since 1984, new Corporate 

Stores have been equipped with noncorroding fiberglass USTs, including some with double-wall construction, overfill protection, 

and electronic tank monitoring. We currently have 3,088 USTs, 2,621 of  which are fiberglass and 467 are steel, and believe that 

substantially all capital expenditures for electronic monitoring, cathodic protection, and overfill/spill protection to comply with the 

existing UST regulations have been completed. Additional regulations or amendments to the existing UST regulations could result 

in future expenditures.

Several states in which we do business have trust fund programs with provisions for sharing or reimbursing corrective 

action or remediation costs incurred by UST owners. In each of  the years ended April 30, 2007 and 2006, we spent approximately 

$1,431,000 and $1,519,000, respectively, for assessments and remediation. Substantially all of  these expenditures were submitted for 

reimbursement from state-sponsored trust fund programs. As of  April 30, 2007, approximately $10,019,000 has been received from 

such programs since inception. The amounts are typically subject to statutory provisions requiring repayment of  the reimbursed funds 

for noncompliance with upgrade provisions or other applicable laws. At April 30, 2007, we had an accrued liability of   

approximately $336,000 for estimated expenses related to anticipated corrective actions or remediation efforts, including relevant 

legal and consulting costs. We believe we have no material joint and several environmental liability with other parties.

ITEM 1A. 

RISK FACTORS

You should carefully consider the risks described in this report before making a decision to invest in our securities. The risks and uncertainties 

described are not the only ones facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial could negatively 

impact our results of  operations or financial condition in the future. If  any of  such risks actually occur, our business, financial condition, and/or results of  

operations could be materially adversely affected. In that case, the trading price of  our securities could decline and you might lose all or part of  your investment.

The convenience store industry is highly competitive.

Risks Related to Our Industry 

The industry and geographic areas in which we operate are highly competitive and marked by ease of  entry and 

constant change in the number and type of  retailers offering the products and services found in our stores. We compete with other 

convenience store chains, gasoline stations, supermarkets, drugstores, discount stores, club stores, and mass merchants. In recent 

years, several nontraditional retailers such as supermarkets, club stores, and mass merchants have affected the convenience store 

industry by entering the gasoline retail business. These nontraditional gasoline retailers have obtained a significant share of  the 

motor fuels market, and their market share is expected to grow. In some of  our markets, our competitors have been in existence 

longer and have greater financial, marketing, and other resources than we do. As a result, our competitors may be able to respond 

better to changes in the economy and new opportunities within the industry. To remain competitive, we must constantly analyze 

consumer preferences and competitors’ offerings and prices to ensure we offer convenience products and services consumers 

demand at competitive prices. We must also maintain and upgrade our customer service levels, facilities, and locations to remain 

competitive and attract customer traffic. Major competitive factors include, among others, location, ease of  access, gasoline brands, 

pricing, product and service selections, customer service, store appearance, cleanliness, and safety.

page 8

 
 
The volatility of  wholesale petroleum costs could adversely affect our operating results.

Over the past three fiscal years, our gasoline revenues accounted for approximately 70% of  total revenue and our 

gasoline gross profit accounted for approximately 23% of  total gross profit. Crude oil and domestic wholesale petroleum 
markets are marked by significant volatility.  General political conditions, acts of  war or terrorism, and instability in oil producing 
regions, particularly in the Middle East and South America, could significantly affect crude oil supplies and wholesale petroleum 
costs. In addition, the supply of  gasoline and our wholesale purchase costs could be adversely affected in the event of  shortage, 
which could result from, among other things, lack of  capacity at United States oil refineries or the absence of  gasoline contracts 
that guarantee an uninterrupted, unlimited supply of  gasoline. Significant increases and volatility in wholesale petroleum costs 
could result in significant increases in the retail price of  petroleum products and in lower gasoline average margin per gallon. 
Increases in the retail price of  petroleum products could adversely affect consumer demand for gasoline. Volatility makes it  
difficult to predict the impact that future wholesale cost fluctuations will have on our operating results and financial condition. 
These factors could adversely affect our gasoline gallon volume, gasoline gross profit, and overall customer traffic, which in turn 
would affect our sales of  grocery and general merchandise and prepared food products.

Wholesale cost increases of  tobacco products could affect our operating results.

Sales of  tobacco products have averaged approximately 9% of  our total revenue over the past three fiscal years, and our 
tobacco gross profit accounted for approximately 12.6% of  total gross profit for the same period. Significant increases in wholesale  
cigarette costs, tax increases on tobacco products, and national and local campaigns to discourage smoking in the United States may 
have an adverse effect on unit demand for cigarettes domestically. In general, we attempt to pass price increases on to our customers. 
Due to competitive pressures in our markets, however, we may not always be able to do so. These factors could adversely affect our  
retail price of  cigarettes, cigarette unit volume and revenues, merchandise gross profit, and overall customer traffic.

Unfavorable weather conditions could adversely affect our business.

Risks Related to Our Business

All of  our stores are located in the Midwest region of  the United States, which is susceptible to thunderstorms, extended 

periods of  rain, ice storms, and heavy snow. Inclement weather conditions could damage our facilities or could have a significant 
impact on consumer behavior, travel, and convenience store traffic patterns as well as our ability to operate our locations. In 
addition, we typically generate higher revenues and gross margins during warmer weather months, which fall within our first 
and second fiscal quarters. If  weather conditions are not favorable during these periods, our operating results and cash flow from 
operations could be adversely affected. 

We may not be able to identify, acquire, and integrate new stores, which could adversely affect our ability to 

grow our business.

An important part of  our recent growth strategy has been to acquire other convenience stores that complement our existing 

stores or broaden our geographic presence. From May 1, 2006 through April 30, 2007 we acquired 52 convenience stores. The  
transactions included the acquisition of  32 HandiMart stores and a truck stop operated under the name “Just Diesel” in eastern 
Iowa. We expect to continue pursuing acquisition opportunities.

Acquisitions involve risks that could cause our actual growth or operating results to differ materially from our  

expectations or the expectations of  securities analysts:

• 

We may not be able to identify suitable acquisition candidates or acquire additional convenience stores on favorable 
terms. We compete with others to acquire convenience stores. We believe this competition may increase and could result 
in decreased availability or increased prices for suitable acquisition candidates. It may be difficult to anticipate the 
timing and availability of  acquisition candidates.

page 9

• 

• 

During the acquisition process we may fail or be unable to discover some of  the liabilities of  companies or businesses we 
acquire. These liabilities may result from a prior owner’s noncompliance with applicable federal, state, or local laws.

Acquired convenience stores may not perform as we expect or we may not be able to obtain the cost savings and 
financial improvements we anticipate.

We are subject to federal and state environmental and other regulations.

Our business is subject to extensive governmental laws and regulations that include but are not limited to environmental 

and employment laws and regulations; legal restrictions on the sale of  alcohol, tobacco, and lottery products; requirements  
related to minimum wage, working conditions, public accessibility, and citizenship. A violation of  or change in such laws and/or 
regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of  operations.

Under various federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and ordinances, we may, as the owner/operator of  our locations, 
be liable for the costs of  removal or remediation of  contamination at these or our former locations, whether or not we knew of, or 
were responsible for, the presence of  such contamination. Failure to remediate such contamination properly may make us liable to 
third parties and adversely affect our ability to sell or lease such property. 

Compliance with existing and future environmental laws regulating underground storage tanks may require significant 
capital expenditures and increased operating and maintenance costs. The remediation costs and other costs required to clean up 
or treat contaminated sites could be substantial. We pay tank registration fees and other taxes to state trust funds established in 
our operating areas in support of  future remediation obligations.

These state trust funds are expected to pay or reimburse us for remediation expenses less a deductible. To the extent 
third parties do not pay for remediation as we anticipate, we will be obligated to make these payments, which could materially 
adversely affect our financial condition and results of  operations. Reimbursements from state trust funds will be dependent on the 
maintenance and continued solvency of  the various funds.

In the future, we may incur substantial expenditures for remediation of  contamination that has yet to be discovered 

at existing locations or at locations we may acquire. We cannot assure you that we have identified all environmental liabilities at 
all of  our current and former locations; that material environmental conditions not known to us do not exist; that future laws, 
ordinances, or regulations will not impose material environmental liability on us; or that a material environmental condition does 
not otherwise exist at any one or more of  our locations. In addition, failure to comply with any environmental laws, regulations, 
or ordinances or an increase in regulations could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

State laws regulate the sale of  al cohol, tobacco, and lottery products. A violation or change of  these laws could adversely 

affect our business, financial condition, and results of  operations because state and local regulatory agencies have the power to 
approve, revoke, suspend, or deny applications for and renewals of  permits and licenses relating to the sale of  these products or to 
seek other remedies. 

Any appreciable increase in income, overtime pay, or the statutory minimum wage rate or adoption of  mandated healthcare 

benefits would result in an increase in our labor costs. Such cost increase or the penalties for failing to comply with such statutory  
minimum could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of  operations.  

page 10

Other Risks

Any issuance of  shares of  our common stock in the future could have a dilutive effect on  

your investment.

We could issue additional shares for investment, acquisition, or other business purposes. Even if  there is not an immediate 

need for capital, we may choose to issue securities to sell in public or private equity markets if  and when conditions are favorable. Raising 
funds by issuing securities would dilute the ownership interests of  our existing stockholders. Additionally, certain types of  equity securities 
we may issue in the future could have rights, preferences, or privileges senior to the rights of  existing holders of  our common stock.

The market price for our common stock has been and may in the future be volatile, which could cause the 

value of  your investment to decline.

Securities markets worldwide experience significant price and volume fluctuations. This market volatility could  

significantly affect the market price of  our common stock without regard to our operating performance. In addition, the price  
of  our common stock could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to these and other factors:

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

A deviation in our results from the expectations of  public market analysts and investors.

Statements by research analysts about our common stock, company, or industry.

Changes in market valuations of  companies in our industry and market evaluations of  our industry generally.

Additions or departures of  key personnel.

Actions taken by our competitors.

Sales of  common stock by the Company, senior officers, or other affiliates.

Other general economic, political, or market conditions, many of  which are beyond our control. 

The market price of  our common  stock will also be affected by our quarterly operating results and quarterly comparable 

store sales growth, which may be expected to fluctuate from quarter to quarter. The following are factors that may affect our 
quarterly results and comparable store sales: general, regional, and national economic conditions; competition; unexpected costs; 
changes in pricing, consumer trends, and the number of  stores we open and/or close during any given period; costs of  compliance 
with corporate governance and Sarbanes-Oxley requirements. Other factors are discussed throughout Management’s Discussion 
and Analysis of  Financial Condition and Results of  Operations. You may not be able to resell your shares of  our common stock 
at or above the price you pay.

Our charter documents include provisions that may have the effect of  preventing or hindering a change in 

control and adversely affecting the market price of  our common stock.

Our articles of  incorporation give the Company’s board of  directors the authority to issue up to 1 million shares of  preferred 

stock and to determine the rights and preferences of  the preferred stock without obtaining stockholder approval. The existence of  this 
preferred stock could make it more difficult or discourage an attempt to obtain control of  the Company by means of  a tender offer, 
merger, proxy contest, or otherwise. Furthermore, this preferred stock could be issued with other rights, including economic rights, senior 
to our common stock, thereby having a potentially adverse effect on the market price of  our common stock. At present, we have no 
plans to issue any preferred stock.

Other provisions of  our articles of  incorporation and bylaws and of  Iowa law could make it more difficult for a third party to 

acquire us or hinder a change in management, even if  doing so would be beneficial to our stockholders. For example, Section 409.1110 
of  the Iowa Business Corporation Act prohibits publicly held Iowa corporations to which it applies from engaging in a business 
combination with an interested stockholder for a period of  three years after the date of  the transaction in which the person became an 

page 11

interested stockholder unless the business combination is approved in a prescribed manner. This provision could discourage others 
from bidding for our shares and could, as a result, reduce the likelihood of  an increase in our stock price that would otherwise 
occur if  a bidder sought to buy our stock.

These governance provisions could affect the market price of  our common stock. We may, in the future, adopt other 

measures that could have the effect of  delaying, deferring, or preventing an unsolicited takeover, even if  such a change in control 
were at a premium price or favored by a majority of  unaffiliated stockholders. These measures may be adopted without any 
further vote or action by our stockholders.

ITEM 1B. 

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.

ITEM 2.  

PROPERTIES

We own our corporate headquarters and distribution center. Located on a 45-acre site in Ankeny, Iowa, these  

adjacent facilities and our vehicle service and maintenance center occupy a total of  approximately 375,000 square feet. The  
original complex was completed in February 1990 and placed in full service at that time. We recently added 98,000 square feet 
to the distribution center, 20,000 square feet of  office space, additional paving for truck parking, and necessary drainage and 
landscaping improvements. 

On April 30, 2007, we owned the land at 1,367 locations and the buildings at 1,377 locations and leased the land at 

81 locations and the buildings at 71 locations. Most of  the leases provide for the payment of  a fixed rent plus property taxes and 
insurance and maintenance costs. Generally, the leases are for terms of  ten to twenty years with options to renew for additional 
periods or options to purchase the leased premises at the end of  the lease period.

ITEM 3.  

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company is named as a defendant in five lawsuits (“hot fuel” cases) brought in the federal courts in Kansas and 
Missouri against a variety of  gasoline retailers. The complaints generally allege that the Company, along with numerous other 
retailers, has misrepresented gasoline volumes dispensed at its pumps by failing to compensate for expansion that occurs when fuel 
is sold at temperatures above 60°F. Fuel is measured at 60°F in wholesale purchase transactions and computation of  motor fuel 
taxes in Kansas and Missouri. The complaints all seek certification as class actions on behalf  of  gasoline consumers within those 
two states, and one of  the complaints also seeks certification for a class consisting of  gasoline consumers in all states. The actions 
generally seek recovery for alleged violations of  state consumer protection or unfair merchandising practices statutes, negligent 
and fraudulent misrepresentation, unjust enrichment, civil conspiracy, and violation of  the duty of  good faith and fair dealing; 
several seek injunctive relief  and punitive damages.

These actions are part of  a number of  similar lawsuits that have been filed in recent weeks in at least 21 states against 
a wide range of  defendants that produce, refine, distribute, and/or market gasoline products in the United States. On June 18, 
2007, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ordered that all of  the pending hot fuel cases be transferred to the District of  
Kansas and assigned to the Honorable Kathryn H. Vratil for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings, including rulings 
on discovery matters, various pretrial motions, and class certification. We do not believe the Company is liable to the defendants 
for the conduct complained of, and we intend to contest the matters vigorously. 

On May 30, 2007, a complaint was filed against the Company in the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of  Iowa by two former employees, in which the claim is made that Casey’s failed to pay overtime compensation properly 
to two or more of  its assistant managers. Specifically, plaintiffs claim that the assistant managers were treated as nonexempt 
employees entitled to overtime pay, but that the Company did not properly record all hours worked and failed to pay the 
assistant managers overtime pay for all hours worked in excess of  40 per week. The action purports to be a collective action 
under the Fair Labor Standards Act (essentially equivalent to a class action) brought on behalf  of  all “persons who are currently 

page 12

 
 
or were employed during the three-year period immediately preceding the filing of  [the] complaint as ‘Assistant  
Managers’ at any Casey’s General Store operated by [the] Defendant (directly or through one of  its wholly owned  
subsidiaries), who worked overtime during any given week within that period, and who have not filed a complaint to  
recover overtime wages.” The complaint seeks relief  in the form of  back wages owed all members of  the class during the  
three-year period preceding the filing of  the complaint, liquidated damages, attorneys fees, and costs. We do not believe the  
Company is liable to the plaintiffs for the conduct complained of, and we intend to contest the matter vigorously.

From time to time we are involved in other legal and administrative proceedings or investigations arising from the conduct 

of  our business operations: including contractual disputes; environmental contamination or remediation issues; employment or 
personnel matters; personal injury and property damage claims; and claims by federal, state, and local regulatory authorities relating to 
the sale of  products pursuant to licenses and permits issued by those authorities. Claims for compensatory or exemplary damages 
in those actions may be substantial. While the outcome of  such litigation, proceedings, investigations, or claims is never certain, it 
is our opinion, after taking into consideration legal counsel’s assessment and the availability of  insurance proceeds and other  
collateral sources to cover potential losses, that the ultimate disposition of  such matters currently pending or threatened,  
individually or cumulatively, will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position and results of  operation.

ITEM 4.  

SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5.  

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, 

AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Common Stock

Casey’s common stock trades on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol CASY. The 50,592,212 shares of  

common stock outstanding at April 30, 2007 had a market value of  $1.3 billion, and there were 2,551 shareholders of  record.

Common Stock Market Prices 

Calendar 
2005

     Q1

     Q2

     Q3

     Q4

High

 Low

$ 19.67

$ 15.98

20.86

23.25

26.09

16.53

19.33

20.19

Calendar 
2006

     Q1

     Q2

     Q3

     Q4

High

Low

Calendar 
2007

High

Low

$ 27.20

$ 22.02

     Q1 $ 26.70 $ 23.49

25.57

25.99

26.00

20.15

21.01

21.19

page 13

 
 
Dividends

We began paying cash dividends during fiscal 1991.The dividends paid in fiscal 2007 totaled $0.20 per share. The 

dividends paid in fiscal 2006 totaled $0.18 per share. Historically, we recorded dividends at the time of  payment, which typically 

followed by several weeks the date on which dividends were declared. On May 1, 2004, we began recording dividends as of  the 

date of  declaration. As a result, Company records show two quarterly dividends paid in the first quarter of  fiscal 2005, the first of  

which ($0.035) was for the fourth quarter of  fiscal 2004 and the second of  which ($0.04) was for the first quarter of  fiscal 2005. 

The Board of  Directors recently declared a quarterly dividend of  $0.065, payable August 15, 2007 to shareholders of  record on 

August 1, 2007. The Board expects to review the dividend every year at its June meeting.

The cash dividends declared during the calendar years 2005-07 were as follows:

Calendar 

   2005

    Q1

    Q2

    Q3

    Q4

Cash dividend 

Calendar 

  Cash dividend

Calendar 

Cash dividend

declared

  0.04

    0.045

    0.045

    0.045

    0.175

$

$

   2006

    Q1

    Q2

    Q3

    Q4

declared

$            0.045

           0.05

           0.05

           0.05

$

 0.195

   2007

    Q1

    Q2

declared

$         0.05 

        0.065

page 14

 
ITEM 6.  

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

Statement of  Income Data

Net sales

Franchise revenue

Cost of  goods sold

Operating expenses

Depreciation and amortization

Interest, net

Earnings from continuing operations
  before income taxes

Federal and state income taxes

Net earnings from continuing operations

Loss on discontinued operations, net of
  tax benefit

Cumulative effect of  accounting change,
  net of  tax benefit

Years ended April 30,       

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

$

4,023,330

$

3,491,795 $

2,786,473

$

2,310,034 $

2,101,721

680

4,024,010

3,440,725

410,459

63,895

11,184

97,747

34,205

63,542

1,651

--------

681

3,492,476

2,966,254

361,857

56,898

8,896

98,571

35,353

63,218

1,667

1,083

1,065

2,787,538

2,330,741

327,009

51,685

10,739

67,364

24,905

42,459

1,669

2,311,703

1,891,179

303,929

47,923

12,398

56,274

18,217

38,057

2,451

2,104,172

1,695,046

283,865

45,697

13,030

66,534

25,234

41,300

5,706

1,591

1,494

--------

--------

Net earnings

$

61,891

$

60,468 $

36,753

$

36,466 $

Basic
  Earnings from continuing operations
  Loss on discontinued operations

Cumulative effect of  accounting             

change, net of  tax benefit 

  Net earnings
Diluted
  Earnings from continuing operations
  Loss on discontinued operations
  Cumulative effect of  accounting 

    change, net of  tax benefit
  Net earnings

$

$

$

$

1.26
.03

--------
1.23

1.25
.03

--------
1.22

$

$

$

$

1.25
.03

.02
1.20

1.24
.03

.02
1.19

$

$

$

$

.84
.11

--------
.73

.84
.11

--------
.73

$

$

$

$

.76
.03

--------
 .73

.76
.03

--------
.73

$

$

$

$

Weighted average number of  common 
  shares outstanding—basic

Weighted average number of  common 
  shares outstanding—diluted

50,468

50,310

50,115

49,876

50,668

50,610

50,284

50,041

--------

39,806

.83
.03

--------
.80

.83
.03

-------
.80

49,643

49,720

Dividends paid per common share

$

0.20

$

0.18

$

0.195

$

0.13

$

0.10

Balance Sheet Data

Current assets

Total assets

Current liabilities

Long-term debt

Shareholders’ equity

Years ended April 30,

2007

2006

2005

2004

$

240,825

$

192,766

$ 143,140

$

147,193

$

1,129,271

234,267

199,504

572,264

988,899

245,056

106,512

523,190

871,619

170,837

123,064

469,137

834,972

146,226

144,158

439,794

2003

118,624

777,075

117,666

162,394

405,660

page 15

 
 
ITEM 7. 

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL 

CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

(Dollars in thousands)

Please read the following discussion of  the Company’s financial condition and results of  operations in conjunction 

with the selected historical consolidated financial data and consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes presented 
elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

Overview 

We derive our revenue from retail sales of  food (including freshly prepared foods such as pizza, donuts, and sandwiches), 

beverages, and nonfood products (including health and beauty aids, tobacco products, automotive products, and gasoline) by 
Corporate Stores and wholesale sales of  certain merchandise and gasoline to Franchise Stores. The Company generates relatively 
minor revenues from continuing monthly royalties based on sales by Franchise Stores; sign and façade rental fees; and the  
provision of  certain maintenance, transportation, and construction services to the Company’s franchisees. A typical store  
generally is not profitable in its first year of  operation due to start-up costs and usually will attain representative levels of  sales  
and profits during its third or fourth year of  operation.

We measure performance using trend analysis and same-store comparisons on net sales and gross profit applied to  
the three business categories of  our Corporate Stores: gasoline, grocery & other merchandise, and prepared food & fountain. 
Comparisons are also made on operating expenses. Fluctuations in operating expenses are compared with the increase or  
decrease in gross profit. Wages are the primary component of  operating expenses, and we believe we have appropriately  
aligned store manager compensation with store performance.

Store growth is a corporate priority. We evaluate the location of  third-party purchases and sites for new construction 

based on expected financial results and return on investment. We purchased 52 stores and built 8 in fiscal 2007.

Fiscal 2007 Compared with Fiscal 2006

Net sales for fiscal 2007 increased 15.2% to $4,023,330, primarily due to a 6.5% increase in gas prices, an increase in 
the number of  gallons sold, an increase in same-store sales, and the net addition of  54 Corporate Stores. Retail gasoline sales for 
the fiscal year were $2,881,054, an increase of  16.2%, and gallons sold increased 9.1% to 1,193,554. Inside sales (grocery & other 
merchandise and prepared food & fountain) increased 12.6% to $1,120,084.

Cost of  goods sold as a percentage of  net sales was 85.5% for fiscal 2007 compared with 84.9% for the prior year. The 

increase was caused by a decrease in the gas margin to 4.3% in fiscal 2007 from 5.1% in fiscal 2006 due to the higher cost of  
gasoline. The grocery & other merchandise margin increased to 32.7% in fiscal 2007 from 32.2% in fiscal 2006 due to a one-time 
benefit of  $4,800 related to cigarettes. The State of  Iowa substantially increased the excise tax on cigarettes without implementing 
an inventory floor tax. Without the one time benefit, the margin would have been 32.1%. The prepared food & fountain margin 
decreased to 62% from 63% primarily due to our switch to a dual cola program. 

Operating expenses increased 13.4% in fiscal 2007, driven by an increase in bank fees resulting from customers’ greater 

use of  credit cards and higher retail gasoline prices and an increase in the number of  Corporate Stores. Higher gasoline prices 
decreased the operating expense ratio to 10.2% of  net sales in fiscal 2007 from 10.4% in the prior year. 

The effective tax rate decreased 0.9% to 35% in fiscal 2007 from 35.9% in fiscal 2006. The decrease in the effective tax rate 
was in part the result of  the prior three years recovery of  a permanent tax benefit related to deductions allowed for dividends paid into 
the Company’s 401(k) plan. A recurring annual tax benefit will be realized going forward. The rate also decreased due to a ref  i   ned and 
slightly downward rate application to the total net deferred tax liabilities, and a decrease in the tax contingency reserve.

page 16

 
 
 
Net earnings from continuing operations increased to $63,542 in fiscal 2007 from $63,218 in fiscal 2006. The 

slight increase was due primarily to the increase in the number of  gallons of  gasoline sold, an increase in same-store sales 
from the prior year, and an increase in the average margin on grocery & other merchandise sales. These increases were 
partially offset by a decrease in the average margin on prepared food & fountain sales. 

Fiscal 2007 discontinued operations resulted in a loss of  $1,651 (net of  $1,055 income tax benefit) compared with a loss 

of  $1,667 (net of  $1,065 income tax benefit) in fiscal 2006. Discontinued stores had total revenues of  $23,052 and $29,728 and 
pretax operating losses of  $688 and $1,170 for fiscal 2007 and 2006, respectively. Included were losses on disposal of  $2,018 (net 
of  $787 tax benefit) for the year ended April 30, 2007 and $1,562 (net of  $609 tax benefit) for the year ended April 30, 2006. The 
losses on disposal for the years ended April 30, 2007 and 2006 included write-downs of  stores to net realizable value as well as 
gains and losses on sales of  stores.

Fiscal 2006 Compared with Fiscal 2005

Net sales for fiscal 2006 increased 25.3% to $3,491,795, primarily due to a 23.2% increase in gas prices and the net addition 
of  55 Corporate Stores. Retail gasoline sales for the fiscal year were $2,478,734, an increase of  33.4%, and gallons sold increased 8.3% 
to 1,093,575. Inside sales (grocery & other merchandise and prepared food & fountain) increased 9.7% to $995,999.

Cost of  goods sold as a percentage of  net sales was 84.9% for fiscal 2006 compared with 83.6% for the prior year.  

The increase was caused by a decrease in the gas margin to 5.1% in fiscal 2006 from 5.9% in fiscal 2005 due to the higher cost 
of  gasoline. The grocery & other merchandise margin increased to 32.2% in fiscal 2006 from 31.1% in fiscal 2005 due to the 
enhancing of  the point-of-sale technology. The prepared food & fountain margin increased to 63% from 60.4%, primarily  
due to the relatively low cost of  cheese during much of  the year and the addition of  profitable new products.

 Operating expenses increased 10.7% in fiscal 2006, driven by an increase in bank fees resulting from customers’ greater 

use of  credit cards and higher retail gasoline prices and an increase in the number of  Corporate Stores. Higher gasoline prices 
decreased the operating expense ratio to 10.4% of  net sales in fiscal 2006 from 11.7% in the prior year.

Depreciation and amortization expense increased 10.1% to $56,898 in fiscal 2006 from $51,685 in fiscal 2005. The 

increase was due to capital expenditures made in fiscal 2006.

The effective tax rate decreased 1.1% to 35.9% in fiscal 2006 from 37.0% in fiscal 2005. The decrease in the effective 
tax rate is primarily the result of  the valuation of  deferred tax assets relating to state income tax depreciation and utilizable net 
operating losses, which exceeded an increase in the tax contingency reserve.

Net earnings from continuing operations increased to $63,218 in fiscal 2006 from $42,459 in fiscal 2005. The increase 

was due primarily to the increase in the average margin per gallon of  gasoline sold (to 11.47¢) from the prior year (10.78¢) and the 
increase in average margin on both prepared food & fountain and grocery & other merchandise sales. 

Discontinued operations for fiscal 2006 resulted in a loss of  $1,667 (net of  $1,065 income tax benefit) compared with a 
loss of  $5,706 (net of  $3,648 income tax benefit) for fiscal 2005. Discontinued stores had total revenues of  $29,728 and $60,020 
and pretax operating losses of  $1,170 and $2,524 for fiscal 2006 and 2005, respectively. Included were losses on disposal of  
$1,562 (net of  $609 tax benefit) for the year ended April 30, 2006 and $6,830 (net of  $2,664 tax benefit) for the year ended  
April 30, 2005. The losses on disposal for the years ended April 30, 2006 and 2005 included write-downs of  stores to net  
realizable value as well as gains and losses on sales of  stores.

page 17

 
 
COMPANY NET SALES AND GROSS PROFITS

Net sales (1)

  Gasoline

  Grocery & other merchandise

  Prepared food & fountain

  Other

Gross profits (2)

  Gasoline

  Grocery & other merchandise

  Prepared food & fountain

  Other

Years ended April 30,

2007

2006

2005

$

2,881,054

$

2,478,734

$

1,858,095

$

$

852,812

267,273

22,191

4,023,330

124,094

278,650

165,764

14,097

$

582,605

767,474

228,525

17,062

3,491,795

125,443

247,024

144,036

9,038

$

$

704,040

204,014

20,324

2,786,473

108,897

219,145

123,154

4,536

525,541

$

455,732

$

$

$

INDIVIDUAL STORE COMPARISONS (3)

Corporate Stores

  Average retail sales

  Average retail inside sales

  Average gross profit on inside items

  Average retail sales of  gasoline

  Average gross profit on gasoline (4)

  Average operating income (5)

  Average number of  gallons sold

Franchise Stores

Years ended April 30,

2007

2006

2005

$

2,763

$

2,568

$

2,144

778

302

1,985

84

102

821

742

284

1,826

91

107

806

706

260

1,438

83

92

782

35

  Average franchise revenue (6)

$

38

$

36

$

(1)  Net sales exclude franchise revenue and charges to franchisees for certain maintenance, transportation, and construction 

services we provide.

(2)  Gross profits represent net sales less cost of  goods sold. Gross profit is given before charge for depreciation and amortization.
(3)  Individual store comparisons include only those stores that had been in operation for at least one full year on April 30 of  the 

fiscal year indicated.

(4)  Retail gasoline profit margins have a substantial impact on our net income. Profit margins on gasoline sales can be adversely 
affected by factors beyond our control, including oversupply in the retail gasoline market, uncertainty or volatility in the 
wholesale gasoline market, and price competition from other gasoline marketers. Any substantial decrease in profit margins 
on retail gasoline sales or the number of  gallons sold could have a material adverse effect on our earnings.

(5)  Average operating income represents retail sales less cost of  goods sold, including cost of  merchandise, financing costs, and 

operating expenses attributable to a particular store; it excludes federal and state income taxes, Company operating expenses 
not attributable to a particular store, and our payments to the Company’s benefit plans.

(6)  Average franchise revenue includes a royalty fee equal to 3% of  gross receipts derived from store sales of  nongasoline items, 

a royalty fee of  $0.018 per gallon on gasoline sales, and sign and façade rental fees.

page 18

Critical Accounting Policies

Critical accounting policies are those accounting policies that we believe are important to the portrayal of  our 

financial condition and results of  operations and require management’s most difficult, subjective judgments, often because 
of  the need to estimate the effects of  inherently uncertain factors.

Inventory 
Inventories, which consist of  merchandise and gasoline, are stated at the lower of  cost or market. For gasoline, cost is 

determined through the use of  the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. For merchandise inventories, cost is determined through the 
use of  the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method applied to inventory values determined primarily by the FIFO method for warehouse 
inventories and the retail inventory method (RIM) for store inventories, except for cigarettes, beer, pop, and prepared foods, which 
are valued at cost. RIM is an averaging method widely used in the retail industry because of  its practicality.

Under RIM, inventory valuations are at cost and the resulting gross margins are calculated by applying a cost-to-retail 

ratio to sales. Inherent in the RIM calculations are certain management judgments and estimates that could affect the ending 
inventory valuation at cost and the resulting gross margins.

Vendor allowances include rebates and other funds received from vendors to promote their products. We often receive 
such allowances on the basis of  quantitative contract terms that vary by product and vendor or directly on the basis of  purchases 
made. Rebates are recognized as reductions of  inventory costs when purchases are made; reimbursements of  an operating  
expense (e.g., advertising) are recorded as reductions of  the related expense. 

Long-lived Assets
The Company periodically monitors underperforming stores for an indication that the carrying amount of  assets may not be 
recoverable. If  the sum of  the expected future undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying amount of  the assets, including goodwill 
where applicable, an impairment loss is recognized. Impairment is based on the estimated fair value of  the asset. Fair value is 
based on management’s estimate of  the amount that could be realized from the sale of  assets in a current transaction between willing 
parties. The estimate is derived from offers, actual sale or disposition of  assets subsequent to year-end, and other indications of  asset 
value. In determining whether an asset is impaired, assets are grouped at the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash 
flows that are largely independent of  the cash flows of  other groups of  assets, which for us is generally on a store-by-store basis. 
We had impairment charges of  $1,475 in fiscal 2007, $600 in fiscal 2006, and $1,775 in fiscal 2005.

Self-insurance
We are primarily self-insured for workers’ compensation, general liability, and automobile claims. The self-insurance claim 

liability is determined actuarially based on claims filed and an estimate of  claims incurred but not yet reported. Actuarial projections of  
the losses are employed due to the high degree of  variability in the liability estimates. Some factors affecting the uncertainty of  claims 
include the development time frame, settlement patterns, litigation and adjudication direction, and medical treatment and cost trends. 
The liability is not discounted. We increased our self-insurance reserve by $756 in fiscal 2007 and $1,096 in fiscal 2006.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Due to the nature of  our business, most sales are for cash; cash from operations is our primary source of  liquidity. We f  inance 
our inventory purchases primarily from normal trade credit aided by relatively rapid inventory turnover. This turnover allows us to conduct 
operations without large amounts of  cash and working capital. As of  April 30, 2007, the Company’s ratio of  current assets to current 
liabilities was 1.03 to 1. The ratio at April 30, 2006 and at April 30, 2005 was .79 to 1 and .84 to 1, respectively. We believe our current 
$50,000 bank line of  credit together with cash flow from operations will be sufficient to satisfy the working capital needs of  our business.

Net cash provided by operations decreased $36,477 (24.7%) in the year ended April 30, 2007, primarily because of  a decrease 
in accounts payable and an increase in inventories. Accounts payable decreased primarily because there were only ten days of  outstanding 
gasoline invoices at April 30, 2007. Since April 30, 2006 was a Sunday, there were twelve days of  gasoline invoices outstanding on that 
date. Inventory increased primarily due to the increase in the cigarette excise taxes, the expanded distribution center capacity, and  
an increase in the number of  Corporate Stores. Cash used in investing in the year ended April 30, 2007 rose $51,135 (50.9%) 
primarily due to the acquisition of  a business. Cash flows from financing increased $96,968, primarily because of  the proceeds 
from long-term debt.

page 19

 
 
 
Capital expenditures represent the single largest use of  Company funds. We believe that by reinvesting in Corporate 

Stores, we will be better able to respond to competitive challenges and increase operating efficiencies. During fiscal 2007, we 
expended $154,433 for property and equipment, primarily for the construction, acquisition, and remodeling of  Corporate Stores 
compared with $104,449 in the prior year. In fiscal 2008, we anticipate expending approximately $135,000, primarily from existing 
cash and funds generated by operations, for construction, acquisition, and remodeling of  Corporate Stores.

As of  April 30, 2007, we had long-term debt of  $199,504 consisting of  $100,000 in principal amount of  5.72% senior 
notes, series A and B; $30,000 in principal amount of  7.38% senior notes; $23,000 in principal amount of  senior notes, series A 
through series F, with interest rates ranging from 6.18% to 7.23%; $34,285 in principal amount of  7.89% senior notes, series A; 
$2,826 of  mortgage notes payable; and $9,393 of  capital lease obligations. 

Interest on the 5.72% senior notes series A and series B is payable on the 30th day of  each March and September. 

Principal of  the senior notes series A and series B matures in various installments beginning September 30, 2012. We may prepay 
the 5.72% senior notes series A and series B in whole or in part at any time in an amount of  not less than $2,000 at a redemption 
price calculated in accordance with the Note Agreement dated September 29, 2006 between the Company and the purchasers of  
the 5.72% senior notes series A and series B.

Interest on the 7.38% senior notes is payable on the 29th day of  each June and December. Principal of  the 7.38%  

senior notes matures in 21 semi-annual installments beginning December 29, 2010 with the remaining principal payable  
December 29, 2020 at the rate of  7.38% per annum. We may prepay the 7.38% notes in whole or in part at any time in an 
amount of  not less than $1,000 or in integral multiples of  $100 in excess thereof  at a redemption price calculated in accordance 
with the Note Agreement dated December 1, 1995 between the Company and the purchaser of  the 7.38% notes.

Interest on the 6.18% to 7.23% senior notes series A through series F is payable on the 23rd day of  each April and October. 

Principal of  the 6.18% to 7.23% senior notes series A through series F matures in various installments beginning April 23, 2004. We 
may prepay the 6.18% to 7.23% senior notes series A through series F in whole or in part at any time in an amount of  not less than 
$1,000 or integral multiples of  $100 in excess thereof  at a redemption price calculated in accordance with the Note Agreement dated 
April 15, 1999 between the Company and the purchasers of  the 6.18% to 7.23% senior notes series A through series F.

Interest on the 7.89% series A senior notes is payable semi-annually the 15th day of  May and November in each year  

commencing November 15, 2000. The 7.89% senior notes mature May 15, 2010 with prepayments of  principal commencing 
on May 15, 2004 and each May 15 thereafter to and including May 15, 2009. The remaining principal is payable at maturity 
on May 15, 2010. We may at any time prepay the 7.89% senior notes in whole or in part in an amount not less than $2,000 at a 
redemption price calculated in accordance with the Note Purchase Agreement dated May 1, 2000 between the Company and the 
purchasers of  the 7.89% senior notes.

To date, we have funded capital expenditures primarily from the proceeds of  the sale of  common stock, issuance of  
6.25% convertible subordinated debentures (converted into shares of  common stock in 1994), the previously described senior 
notes, a mortgage note and through funds generated from operations. Future capital required to finance operations, improvements, 
and the anticipated growth in the number of  Corporate Stores is expected to come from cash generated by operations, the bank 
line of  credit, and additional long-term debt or other securities as circumstances may dictate. We do not expect such capital needs 
to adversely affect liquidity.

The table below presents our significant contractual obligations, including interest, at April 30, 2007:

Contractual Obligations

Payments due by period

Senior notes

Mortgage notes

Capital lease obligations

Operating lease obligations

Total

$

297,049

34,660

19,444

1,598

              Total

$

352,751

Less than
1 year

29,445

30,632

1,264

597

61,938

1-3
years

51,200

1,970

2,142

768

56,080

3-5
years

36,210

1,153

949

160

38,472

More than 
5 years

180,194

905

15,089

73

196,261

page 20

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Included in mortgage notes payable in less than 1 year in the table above is $21,610 relating to the purchase of  the 

Gas ‘N Shop stores that may be paid in future years. The seller has an option at any time to make an immediate sale of  any or 
all of  the stores or to lease any of  the stores to us for a period of  five years and an option at any time during that five-year period 
to require the Company to purchase any leased store and pay the applicable purchase price within forty-five days of  notice. The annual 
lease payments are equal to 6% of  the purchase price of  the stores leased and are paid monthly during the term of  the lease.  
See Note 2 of  Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the purchase of  Gas ‘N Shop. 

At April 30, 2007, we were partially self-insured for workers’ compensation claims in all 9 states of  our marketing 

territory; we also were partially self-insured for general liability and auto liability under an agreement that provides for annual 
stop-loss limits equal to or exceeding approximately $1,000. To facilitate this agreement, letters of  credit approximating $8,800 
and $7,500 were issued and outstanding at April 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, on the insurance company’s behalf. We renew 
the letters of  credit on an annual basis.

Forward-looking Statements

This Form 10-K contains various “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of  Section 27A of  the Securities Act 

of  1933 as amended and Section 21E of  the Securities Exchange Act of  1934 as amended. Forward-looking statements represent our 
expectations or beliefs concerning future events, including (i) any statements regarding future sales and gross profit percentages, (ii) any 
statements regarding the continuation of  historical trends, and (iii) any statements regarding the sufficiency of  the Company’s cash  
balances and cash generated from operations and financing activities for the Company’s future liquidity and capital resource needs. The 
words believe, expect, anticipate, intend, estimate, project and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. 
We caution you that these statements are further qualified by important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from 
those in the forward-looking statements, including without limitations the factors described in this Form 10-K. 

We ask you not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements because they speak only of  our views as of  

the statement dates. Although we have attempted to list the important factors that presently affect the Company’s business and 
operating results, we further caution you that other factors may in the future prove to be important in affecting the Company’s 
results of  operations. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result 
of  new information, future events, or otherwise.

In addition to any assumptions and other factors referred to specifically in connection with such forward-looking  

statements, factors that could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from those contemplated in any  
forward-looking statements include, among others, the following:

Competition
Our business is highly competitive and marked by ease of  entry and constant change in terms of  the numbers and 

type of  retailers offering the products and services found in Corporate Stores. Many of  the food (including prepared foods) and 
nonfood items similar or identical to those we sell are generally available from a variety of  competitors in the communities served 
by Corporate Stores, and we compete with other convenience store chains, gasoline stations, supermarkets, drug stores, discount 
stores, club stores, mass merchants, and fast-food outlets (with respect to the sale of  prepared foods). Sales of  nongasoline items 
(particularly prepared food items) have contributed substantially to our gross profit on retail sales in recent years. Gasoline sales 
are intensely competitive. We compete for gasoline sales with both independent and national brand gasoline stations, other  
convenience store chains, and several nontraditional gasoline retailers such as supermarkets in specific markets. Some of  these 
other gasoline retailers may have access to more favorable arrangements for gasoline supply than do we or the firms that supply 
our stores. Some of  our competitors have greater financial, marketing, and other resources than we have and therefore may be 
able to respond better to changes in the economy and new opportunities within the industry. 

page 21

 
 
 
 
 
Gasoline Operations
Gasoline sales are an important part of  our revenue and earnings, and retail gasoline profit margins have a substantial 
impact on our net income. Profit margins on gasoline sales can be affected adversely by factors beyond our control, including the 
supply of  gasoline available in the retail gasoline market, uncertainty or volatility in the wholesale gasoline market, increases in 
wholesale gasoline costs generally during a period, and price competition from other gasoline marketers. The market for crude oil 
and domestic wholesale petroleum products is volatile and is affected by general political conditions and instability in oil producing 
regions such as the Middle East and South America. The volatility of  the wholesale gasoline market makes it extremely difficult  
to predict the impact of  future wholesale cost fluctuation on our operating results and financial conditions. These factors could 
materially affect gasoline gallon volume, gasoline gross profit, and overall customer traffic levels at Corporate Stores. Any  
substantial decrease in profit margins on gasoline sales or in the number of  gallons sold by Corporate Stores could have a  
material adverse effect on our earnings.

The Company purchases its gasoline from a variety of  independent national and regional petroleum distributors. Although in 
recent years suppliers have not experienced any difficulties in obtaining sufficient amounts of  gasoline to meet our needs, unanticipated 
national and international events could result in a reduction of  gasoline supplies available for distribution. Any substantial curtailment in 
our gasoline supply would reduce gasoline sales. Further, we believe a significant amount of  our business results from the patronage of  
customers primarily desiring to purchase gasoline; accordingly, reduced gasoline supplies could adversely affect the sale of  nongasoline 
items. Such factors could have a material adverse impact on our earnings and operations.

Tobacco Products
Sales of  tobacco products represent a significant portion of  our revenues. Significant increases in wholesale cigarette 
costs and tax increases on tobacco products as well as national and local campaigns to discourage smoking in the United States 
could have an adverse effect on the demand for cigarettes sold by Corporate Stores. We attempt to pass price increases on to our 
customers, but competitive pressures in specific markets may prevent us from doing so. These factors could materially affect the 
retail price of  cigarettes, the volume of  cigarettes sold by Corporate Stores, and overall customer traffic. 

Environmental Compliance Costs
The United States Environmental Protection Agency and several of  the states in which we do business have adopted 

laws and regulations relating to underground storage tanks used for petroleum products. In the past, we have incurred substantial 
costs to comply with such regulations, and additional substantial costs may be necessary in the future. Several states in which we 
do business have trust fund programs with provisions for sharing or reimbursing corrective action or remediation costs. Any  
reimbursements received in respect to such costs typically are subject to statutory provisions requiring repayment of  the  
reimbursed funds for any future noncompliance with upgrade provisions or other applicable laws. Although we regularly accrue 
expenses for the estimated costs related to future corrective action or remediation efforts, there can be no assurance that the  
accrued amounts will be sufficient to pay such costs or that we have identified all environmental liabilities at all of  our current 
store locations. In addition, there can be no assurance that we will not incur substantial expenditures in the future for remediation 
of  contamination or related claims that have not been discovered or asserted with respect to existing store locations or locations 
that we may acquire in the future, that we will not be subject to any claims for reimbursement of  funds disbursed to us under 
the various state programs, and/or that additional regulations or amendments to existing regulations will not require additional 
expenditures beyond those presently anticipated.

Seasonality of  Sales 
Company sales generally are strongest during its first two fiscal quarters (May–October) and weakest during the third 
and fourth fiscal quarters (November–April). In the warmer months, customers tend to purchase greater quantities of  gasoline 
and certain convenience items such as beer, soft drinks, and ice. Difficult weather conditions (such as flooding, prolonged rain, or 
snowstorms) in any quarter, however, may adversely reduce sales at affected Corporate Stores and may have an adverse impact on 
our earnings for that period.

page 22

 
ITEM 7A. 

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company’s exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our investment portfolio 

and long-term debt obligations. We place our investments with high-quality credit issuers and, by policy, limit the amount of  

credit exposure to any one issuer. Our first priority is to reduce the risk of  principal loss. Consequently, we seek to preserve our 

invested funds by limiting default risk, market risk, and reinvestment risk. We mitigate default risk by investing in only high-quality 

credit securities that we believe to be low risk and by positioning our portfolio to respond appropriately to a significant reduction 

in a credit rating of  any investment issuer or guarantor. The portfolio includes only marketable securities with active secondary or 

resale markets to ensure portfolio liquidity. We believe an immediate 100-basis-point move in interest rates affecting our floating 

and fixed rate financial instruments as of  April 30, 2007 would have no material effect on pretax earnings. 

We have used a variety of  derivative instruments such as options and futures to hedge against the volatility of  gasoline 

cost and are at risk for possible changes in the market value of  these derivative instruments. It is anticipated that such risk would 

be mitigated by price changes in the underlying hedged items. Market risks associated with all of  the Company’s derivative 

contracts are reviewed regularly by management. No derivative instruments were used during fiscal year 2007. See Note 1 to 

the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-K for additional information concerning our prior use of  such 

derivative instruments. 

page 23

 
 
ITEM 8.  

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of  Directors and Shareholders

Casey’s General Stores, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of  Casey’s General Stores, Inc. and subsidiaries as  
of  April 30, 2007 and 2006 and the related consolidated statements of  income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each  
of  the years in the three-year period ended April 30, 2007. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of   
the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on  
our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of  the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board 

(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the 
financial statements are free of  material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the 
amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and  
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that  
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial 

position of  Casey’s General Stores, Inc. and subsidiaries as of  April 30, 2007 and 2006 and the results of  their operations and 
their cash flows for each of  the years in the three-year period ended April 30, 2007 in conformity with U.S. generally accepted 
accounting principles.

As discussed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Casey’s General Stores, Inc. changed its method  

of  accounting for stock based compensation effective May 1, 2006, and changed its method of  quantifying errors in 2007. We 
also have audited, in accordance with the standards of  the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the  
effectiveness of  the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of  April 30, 2007, based on criteria established in  
Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of  Sponsoring Organizations of  the Treadway Commission 
(COSO), and our report dated June 28, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on management’s assessment of, and the  
effective operation of, internal control over financial reporting.

Des Moines, Iowa
June 28, 2007

page 24

 
The Board of  Directors and Shareholders
Casey’s General Stores, Inc.:

We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control 
Over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A, that Casey’s General Stores, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) maintained 
effective internal control over financial reporting as of  April 30, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated 
Framework issued by the Committee of  Sponsoring Organizations of  the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s 
management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of  the 
effectiveness of  internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s 
assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of  the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of  the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United 
States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal 
control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of  internal 
control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness 
of  internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our 
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding 

the reliability of  financial reporting and the preparation of  financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally 
accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that 
(1) pertain to the maintenance of  records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions 
of  the assets of  the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation 
of  financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of  the 
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of  management and directors of  the company; and (3) provide 
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of  unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of  the company’s 
assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of  its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. 

Also, projections of  any evaluation of  effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate 
because of  changes in conditions, or that the degree of  compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management’s assessment that Casey’s General Stores, Inc. and subsidiaries maintained effective 

internal control over financial reporting as of  April 30, 2007, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established 
in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of  Sponsoring Organizations of  the Treadway Commission 
(COSO). Also, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting 
as of  April 30, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of   
Sponsoring Organizations of  the Treadway Commission (COSO).

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of  the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United 

States), the consolidated balance sheets of  Casey’s General Stores, Inc. and subsidiaries as of  April 30, 2007 and 2006 and the related 
consolidated statements of  income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of  the years in the three-year period ended  
April 30, 2007, and our report dated June 28, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

Des Moines, Iowa
June 28, 2007

page 25

CASEY’S GENERAL STORES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share amounts)

Assets

Current assets

Cash and cash equivalents

Receivables

Inventories (Note 1)

Prepaid expenses (Note 6)

      Income taxes receivable

Total current assets

Property and equipment, at cost 

Land

Buildings and leasehold improvements

  Machinery and equipment

Leasehold interest in property and equipment (Note 7)

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

Net property and equipment

Other assets, net of  amortization (Note 1)

Goodwill

Total assets

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

Current liabilities

Current maturities of  long-term debt (Note 3)

$

47,566

$

Accounts payable

Accrued expenses   

     Property taxes

             Self-insurance

     Other (Note 10)

Total current liabilities

Long-term debt, net of  current maturities (Note 3)

Deferred income taxes (Note 6)

Deferred compensation (Note 8)

Other long-term liabilities

Total liabilities

Shareholders’ equity (Note 4)

Preferred stock, no par value, none issued
Common stock, no par value, 50,592,212 and 50,368,662 shares 
          issued and outstanding at April 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively

Retained earnings

Total shareholders’ equity

134,375

13,097

16,391

22,838

234,267

199,504

105,724

9,016

8,496

557,007

--------

53,547
518,717

572,264

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

$

1,129,271

$

Commitments and contingencies (Notes 7, 9, and 10)
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

page 26

April 30,

2007

2006

$

107,067

$

13,432

109,702

7,891

2,733

240,825

233,887

501,470

620,620

15,452

75,369

11,032

96,255

7,063

3,047

192,766

211,910

469,070

577,209

6,924

1,371,429

1,265,113

538,121

833,308

8,550

46,588

$

1,129,271

$

490,288

774,825

6,894

14,414

988,899

51,628

146,121

11,418

15,635

20,254

245,056

106,512

99,929

7,236

6,976

465,709

--------

49,161
474,029

523,190

 988,899

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

Net sales

Franchise revenue

Cost of  goods sold (exclusive of  depreciation,
  shown separately below)
Operating expenses

Depreciation and amortization

Interest, net (Note 3) 

Earnings from continuing operations before
  income taxes
Federal and state income taxes

Net earnings from continuing operations

Loss on discontinued operations, net of  tax benefit
  of  $1,055, $1,065 and $3,648
Cumulative effect of  accounting change, net of  tax
  benefit of  $692
Net earnings

Basic

  Earnings from continuing operations

  Loss on discontinued operations, net of  tax benefit

  Cumulative effect of  accounting change

  Net earnings per common share

Diluted

  Earnings from continuing operations

  Loss on discontinued operations, net of  tax benefit

  Cumulative effect of  accounting change

  Net earnings per common share

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Years ended April 30,

2007

2006

2005

$

4,023,330

$

3,491,795

$

2,786,473

680

4,024,010

681

3,492,476

1,065

2,787,538

3,440,725

2,966,254

2,330,741

410,459

63,895

11,184

361,857

56,898

8,896

327,009

51,685

10,739

3,926,263

3,393,905

2,720,174

97,747

34,205

63,542

1,651

--------

98,571

35,353

63,218

1,667

1,083

61,891

$

60,468

$

$

$

$

1.26

0.03

--------

1.23

1.25

0.03

--------

1.22

$

1.25

0.03

0.02

1.20

1.24

0.03

0.02

1.19

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

67,364

24,905

42,459

5,706

--------

36,753

0.84

0.11

--------

0.73

0.84

0.11

--------

0.73

page 27

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

Balance at April 30, 2004

     Net earnings

     Payment of  dividends 

     Proceeds from exercise of  stock options
       (173,950 shares)
     Tax benefits related to nonqualified stock options
       (Note 3)

Balance at April 30, 2005

     Net earnings

     Payment of  dividends
     Proceeds from exercise of  stock options
       (178,850 shares)
     Tax benefits related to nonqualified stock options 
       (Note 3)

Balance at April 30, 2006

     Net earnings

     Payment of  dividends
     Proceeds from exercise of  stock options
       (223,550 shares)
     Tax benefits related to nonqualified stock options 
       (Note 3)

     Stock based compensation
     Cumulative effect of  adjustments resulting from the
        adoption of  SAB No. 108, (Note 1)

Common 
stock

Retained 
earnings

Total

$

44,155

$

     395,639 

$

      439,794 

--------

--------

1,893

468

       36,753 

        (9,771)

        36,753 

(9,771)

-------- 

          1,893 

-------- 

468 

$

46,516

$

     422,621 

$

     469,137 

--------

--------

2,139

506

       60,468 

        (9,060)

       60,468 

 (9,060)

-------- 

         2,139 

-------- 

506 

$

49,161

$

     474,029 

$

     523,190 

--------

--------

2,941

919

526

       61,891 

      (10,098)

       61,891 

(10,098)

-------- 

         2,941 

-------- 

-------- 

919 

526 

--------

(7,105)

(7,105)

Balance at April 30, 2007

$

53,547

$

     518,717 

$

572,264 

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 

page 28

-------- 

     51,685 

-------- 

-------- 

       3,041 

       2,880 

(2,054)

       2,503 

       1,813 

     17,252 

       8,068 

       5,423 

(3,507)

   129,563 

(95,447)

-------- 

       2,452 

(92,995)

-------- 

(28,999)

Years ended April 30,

    2007

    2006

     2005    

$

     63,542 

$

     63,218 

$

     42,459 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS  (IN THOUSANDS) 

Cash flows from continuing operations

     Net earnings from continuing operations
     Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net
      cash provided by continuing operations
        Cumulative effect of  accounting change

        Depreciation and amortization

        Other amortization

        Stock-based compensation

        Loss on sale of  property and equipment

        Deferred income taxes

        Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of  acquisitions

            Receivables

            Inventories 

            Prepaid expenses 

            Accounts payable 

            Accrued expenses

            Income taxes receivable

        Other, net

-------- 

     63,895 

          482 

          526 

       3,076 

(406)

(2,400)

(10,437)

(696)

(11,746)

       4,681 

       1,233 

(418)

(1,083)

     56,898 

       1,871 

-------- 

       1,757 

(2,110)

(2,841)

(20,863)

(2,384)

     45,481 

       4,746 

       3,386 

(267)

Net cash provided by continuing operations

   111,332 

   147,809 

Cash flows from investing

     Purchase of  property and equipment

     Payments for acquisition of  business

     Proceeds from sales of  property and equipment

Net cash used in investing activities

Cash flows from f  inancing

     Proceeds from long-term debt

     Payments of  long-term debt

     Proceeds from exercise of  stock options

     Payments of  cash dividends

Net cash provided by (used in) f  inancing activities

Cash flows from discontinued operations

     Operating cash flows

     Investing cash flows

Net cash flows from discontinued operations

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of  year

(87,704)

(66,729)

       2,764 

(151,669)

   100,000 

(22,814)

       2,941 

(10,098)

     70,029 

           792 

       1,214 

       2,006 

     31,698 

     75,369 

(99,913)

(4,536)

       3,915 

(100,534)

-------- 

(20,018)

       2,139 

       1,893 

(9,060)

(26,939)

          518 

       5,464 

       5,982 

     26,318 

     49,051 

(9,771)

(36,877)

       2,621 

           852 

       3,473 

       3,164 

     45,887 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of  year

$

   107,067 

$

     75,369 

$

     49,051 

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOWS INFORMATION

Cash paid during the year for

     Interest, net of  amount capitalized

     Income taxes

Noncash investing and f  inancing activities
     Property & equipment and goodwill acquired through
        installment purchases or business acquisitions
     Increase in common stock and increase in income taxes 
        receivable due to tax benef  its  related to nonqualif  ied stock
        options (Note 3)

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

$

      12,417 

$

     10,657 

$

    11,811 

     31,271 

     32,995 

    11,303 

     11,744 

     27,458 

      7,197 

919 

506 

468 

page 29

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

1. 

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Operations  Casey’s General Stores, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company/Casey’s) operate 1,463 convenience stores 
in 9 Midwest states. At April 30, 2007, the Company owned or leased 1,448 of  these stores and 15 stores were owned or leased 
by franchisees. The stores are located primarily in smaller communities, many with populations of  less than 5,000. Retail sales in 
2007 were distributed as follows: 72% gasoline, 21% grocery & other merchandise, and 7% prepared food & fountain. The  
Company’s materials are readily available, and the Company is not dependent on a single supplier or only a few suppliers.

Principles of  consolidation  The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of  Casey’s General 

Stores, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in 
consolidation.

Use of  estimates  The preparation of  financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting  

principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect 1) the reported amounts of  assets and liabilities 
and disclosure of  contingent assets and liabilities at the date of  the financial statements and 2) the reported amounts of  revenues 
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash equivalents  Cash equivalents consist of  money market funds, corporate commercial paper securities, and  

various tax-exempt instruments. We consider all highly liquid investments with a maturity at purchase of  three months or less  
to be cash equivalents.

Inventories  Inventories, which consist of  merchandise and gasoline, are stated at the lower of  cost or market; in-store 

inventory (excluding cigarettes, beer, pop, and prepared foods, which are stated at cost) is determined by the retail method (RIM). 
Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method for gasoline and the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method for merchandise. 
Below is a summary of  the inventory values at April 30, 2007 and 2006:

Gasoline

Merchandise

Fiscal 2007

Fiscal 2006

 $     46,577 

 $      43,932 

        83,237 

         70,813 

Merchandise LIFO reserve

(20,112)

(18,490)

Total inventory

 $  109,702 

 $      96,255 

Goodwill SFAS No. 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets requires that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite 

lives no longer be amortized to earnings but be tested for impairment at least annually. As of  April 30, 2007, there was $46,588  
of  goodwill, and management’s analysis of  recoverability completed as of  the fiscal year-end yielded no evidence of  impairment.

page 30

Store closings and asset impairment  The Company writes down property and equipment of  stores it is closing to 

estimated net realizable value at the time management commits to a plan to close such stores and begins active marketing of  the 
stores. The Company bases the estimated net realizable value of  property and equipment on its experience in utilizing and/or 
disposing of  similar assets and on estimates provided by its own and/or third-party real estate experts. The results of  operations 
of  certain stores are presented as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of  earnings in accordance with 
the provisions of  SFAS No. 144, Accounting of  the Impairment or Disposal of  Long-Lived Assets. Any such store is presented in discontinued 
operations beginning in the quarter in which the asset qualifies as held for sale or is disposed of  and no further involvement or benefit is 
expected upon disposal. Operating results of  discontinued operations include related write-downs of  stores to estimated net realizable 
value. The Company does not allocate interest expense to discontinued operations. Included in the loss on discontinued operations were 
losses on disposal of  $2,018 (net of  $787 tax benefit) for the year ended April 30, 2007. Losses on disposal of  $1,562 (net of  $609 tax 
benefit) were recorded for the year ended April 30, 2006; losses on disposal of  $6,830 (net of  $2,664 tax benefit) were recorded for the 
year ended April 30, 2005. Assets held for sale at April 30, 2007 and 2006 were $2,900 and $1,225, respectively, and are included in net 
property & equipment.

The Company periodically monitors underperforming stores for an indication that the carrying amount of  assets may 

not be recoverable. If  the sum of  the expected future undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying amount of  the assets, 
including goodwill where applicable, an impairment loss is recognized. Impairment is based on the estimated fair value of  the 
asset. Fair value is based on management’s estimate of  the amount that could be realized from the sale of  assets in a current 
transaction between willing parties. The estimate is derived from offers, actual sale or disposition of  assets subsequent to year-end, 
and other indications of  asset value. In determining whether an asset is impaired, assets are grouped at the lowest level for which 
there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of  the cash flows of  other groups of  assets, which for the Company is 
generally on a store-by-store basis. The Company incurred impairment charges of  $1,475 in fiscal 2007, $600 in fiscal 2006, and 
$1,775 in fiscal 2005. Impairment charges are a component of  operating expenses.  

Depreciation and amortization  Depreciation of  property and equipment and amortization of  capital lease assets are 

computed principally by the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:

Buildings

Machinery and equipment

25-40 years

5-30 years

Leasehold interest in property and equipment

Leasehold improvements

Lesser of  term of  lease or life of  asset

Lesser of  term of  lease or life of  asset

Excise taxes  Excise taxes approximating $423,000, $377,000, and $365,000 collected from customers on retail gasoline 

sales are included in net sales for fiscal 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.

Income taxes  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences 

between the financial statement carrying amounts of  existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax  
assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those  
temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of  a change in  
tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

page 31

 
 
 
Revenue recognition  The Company recognizes retail sales of  gasoline, grocery & other merchandise, prepared food & 

fountain, and commissions on lottery, prepaid phone cards, and video rentals at the time of  the sale to the customer. Wholesale 
sales to franchisees are recognized at the time of  delivery to the franchise location. Franchise fees, license fees to franchisees, and 
rent for franchise façades are recognized monthly when billed to the franchisees. Other maintenance services and transportation 
charges are recognized at the time the service is provided.

Vendor allowances include rebates and other funds received from vendors to promote their products. The Company 

often receives such allowances on the basis of  quantitative contract terms that vary by product and vendor or directly on the 
basis of  purchases made. Vendor rebates in the form of  rack display allowances are treated as a reduction in cost of  sales and are 
recognized incrementally over the period covered by the applicable rebate agreement. Vendor rebates in the form of  billbacks are 
treated as a reduction in cost of  sales and are recognized at the time the product is sold. Reimbursements of  an operating expense 
(e.g., advertising) are recorded as reductions of  the related expense.

Discontinued operations  Sales from discontinued operations were $23,052, $29,728 and $60,020 for the years ended 

April 30, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. Losses from discontinued operations were $2,706 for the year ended April 30, 2007, 
including a $2,018 pretax loss on disposal. Losses from discontinued operations were $2,732 and $9,354 for the years ended  
April 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Losses from discontinued operations were net of  tax benefits of  $1,055, $1,065, and  
$3,648 for the years ended April 30, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.

The Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of  April 30, 2007 included $2,900 in net property and equipment  

classified as assets held for sale; there were no related liabilities pertaining to discontinued operations. The Company’s  
consolidated balance sheet as of  April 30, 2006 included $1,225 in net property and equipment and no related liabilities  
pertaining to discontinued operations.

Earnings per common share    Basic earnings per share have been computed by dividing net income by the weighted 

average outstanding common shares during each of  the years. Calculation of  diluted earnings per share treats stock options  
outstanding as potential common shares.

Environmental remediation liabilities  The Company accounts for environmental remediation liabilities in accordance 

with the American Institute of  Certified Public Accountants’ Statement of  Position (SOP) 96-1, Environmental Remediation Liabilities. 
SOP 96-1 requires, among other things, environmental remediation liabilities to be accrued when the criteria of  SFAS No. 5,  
Accounting for Contingencies, are met.

Derivative instruments  The Company periodically uses a variety of  derivative instruments such as options and futures 
to hedge against the volatility of  gasoline cost. The Company is at risk for possible changes in the market value for these derivative 
instruments. It is anticipated that such risk would be mitigated by price changes in the underlying hedged items. Market risks  
associated with all of  the Company’s derivative contracts are reviewed regularly by management.  

There were no options or futures contracts during the year ended April 30, 2007 or 2006. At April 30, 2005, however, 

the Company had accumulated net hedging losses before income taxes of  $929 on closed options and futures contracts. The 
amounts represented the fair value of  the contracts as determined using various indices and dealer quotes. These derivative 
contracts were not linked to specific assets or liabilities on the balance sheet or to forecasted transactions in an accounting hedge 
relationship and therefore did not qualify for hedge accounting. The contracts were carried at fair value with any changes in fair 
value recorded as part of  cost of  goods sold in the income statement. 

page 32

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Stock-based compensation Effective May 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of  Statement of   

Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (revised 2004) (SFAS 123R), Share Based Payment using the “modified  
prospective” transition method. SFAS 123R requires the measurement of  the cost of  employee services received in 
exchange for an award of  equity instruments based upon the fair value of  the award on the grant date. The cost of  the 
award is recognized in the income statement over the vesting period of  the award. Under the “modified prospective” transition 
method, awards that are granted, modified or settled beginning at the date of  adoption are measured and accounted for in  
accordance with SFAS 123R. In addition, expense must be recognized in the income statement for unvested awards that were 
granted prior to the date of  adoption. The expense will be based on the fair value determined at the grant date. The impact of  
net earnings as a result of  the adoption of  SFAS 123R was $526 in fiscal 2007. 

Prior to May 1, 2006, the Company applied APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, in accounting 
for its incentive stock option plan; accordingly, the financial statements recognized no compensation cost for stock options issued 
at fair market value on the date of  grant. The Company had elected the pro forma disclosure option of  SFAS No. 123, Accounting 
for Stock-Based Compensation. Pro forma net earnings and pro forma net earnings per common share have been provided as if  SFAS 
No. 123 were adopted for all stock-based compensation plans prior to May 1, 2006. Had the Company determined compensation 
cost of  its stock options based on the fair value at the grant date under SFAS No. 123, the Company’s net income would have 
been reduced to the pro forma amounts shown in the following table:

Net income as reported
Deducted amount
   Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined 

by fair-value method for awards, net of  related tax effects

Pro forma net income

Basic earnings per common share

As reported

Pro forma

Diluted earnings per common share 

As reported

Pro forma

Years ended April 30,

2006

60,468

458

60,010

1.20

1.19

1.19

1.19

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

2005

36,753

302

36,451

0.73

0.73

0.73

0.72

The weighted average fair value of  the stock options granted during 2006 and 2005 was $6.06 and $4.36 per share, 

respectively, on the date of  grant. Fair value was calculated using the Black Scholes option-pricing model with the following 
weighted average assumptions: 2006—expected dividend yield of  0.87%, risk-free interest rate of  4.04%, estimated volatility 
of  24%, and an expected life of  6.2 years; 2005—expected dividend yield of  0.95%, risk-free interest rate of  3.75%, estimated 
volatility of  24%, and an expected life of  5.8 years.

page 33

 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements In June 2006, the FASB ratified the consensus reached by the Emerging Issues 

Task Force on Issue No. 06-3, How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should be Presented in the Income 
Statement (That is, Gross versus Net Presentation). Issue No. 06-3 requires disclosure of  either the gross or net presentation; and any 
such taxes reported on a gross basis should be disclosed in the interim and annual financial statements. Issue No. 06-3 is effective 
for financial periods beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company has not changed its presentation of  such taxes, and is 
providing the disclosure required by Issue No. 06-3.

In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an Interpretation of  FASB 

Statement No. 109 (FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the application of  FASB Statement No. 109 by providing guidance on the recognition 
and measurement of  an enterprise’s tax positions taken in a tax return. FIN 48 additionally clarifies how an enterprise should  
account for a tax position depending on whether the position is ‘more likely than not’ to pass a tax examination. The interpretation 
provides guidance on measurement, derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, 
and transition. The Company will be required to adopt FIN 48 in the first quarter of  fiscal 2008 and expects to reduce retained 
earnings by approximately $650 due to the adoption of  this interpretation.

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. 

SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value  
measurements. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007  
and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating SFAS No. 157 to determine the impact,  
if  any, on the financial statements.

In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) released Staff  Accounting Bulletin No. 108 (SAB 

No. 108), Considering the Effects of  Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements. SAB No. 
108 addresses how the effects of  prior-year uncorrected misstatements should be considered when quantifying misstatements in 
current year financial statements. SAB No. 108 requires an entity to quantify misstatements using a balance sheet and income 
statement approach and to evaluate whether either approach results in quantifying an error that is material in light of  relevant 
quantitative and qualitative factors. The Company adopted SAB No. 108 in the fourth quarter of  fiscal 2007.

The transition provisions of  SAB No. 108 permit adjustment for the cumulative effect on retained earnings of  errors 
previously determined to be immaterial, but pursuant to the guidance in the SAB, would be considered material under the dual 
method. SAB No. 108 also requires that adjustment of  any prior quarterly financial statements within the fiscal year of  adoption 
be made for the effects of  such errors on the quarters when the information is next presented. Such adjustments do not require 
previously filed reports with the SEC to be amended. 

Two techniques were identified as being used by companies in practice to accumulate and quantify misstatements—the 
rollover approach and the iron curtain approach. The rollover approach, which is the approach Casey’s previously used, quantifies 
a misstatement on the basis of  the amount of  the error originating in the current-year income statement. Accordingly, this approach 
ignores the effects of  correcting the portion of  the current year balance sheet misstatement that originated in prior years. The iron 
curtain approach quantifies a misstatement on the basis of  the effects of  correcting the misstatement existing in the balance sheet 
at the end of  the current year irrespective of  the misstatement’s year(s) of  origination. The primary weakness of  the iron curtain 
approach is that it does not consider the correction of  prior-year misstatements in the current year to be errors. 

Using the rollover approach resulted in an accumulation of  misstatements to Casey’s balance sheets that were deemed 

immaterial to the financial statements because the amounts that originated in each year were quantitatively and qualitatively  
immaterial. The Company has elected, as allowed under SAB 108, to reflect the effect of  initially applying this guidance by 
adjusting the carrying amount of  the impacted assets and liabilities as of  the beginning of  fiscal 2007 and recording an offsetting 
adjustment to the opening balance of  retained earnings in fiscal 2007. Casey’s recorded a cumulative adjustment to decrease 
retained earnings by $7,105 for the adoption of  SAB 108. The Company evaluated the impact of  these adjustments on previous 
periods presented in its consolidated financial statements, individually and in the aggregate, under the rollover method and  
concluded that they were immaterial to those periods’ consolidated financial statements. 

page 34

 
 
 
 
 
 
The following table presents a description of  the individual adjustments included in the cumulative adjustment 

to retained earnings. These adjustments were identified by management in the normal course of  performing internal 
control activities: 

Deferred tax liability

Net property and equipment

Amount

Years Affected

$

$

6,201
904

7,105

1980s-2004

2002-2004

The deferred tax liability was understated primarily due to book vs. tax differences in depreciation and the  

recording of  leases that were capitalized for book purposes and treated as operating for tax purposes. 

The property and equipment was overstated primarily due to the treatment of  store replacements. Prior to May 1, 2004, 

the fixed assets of  the stores that were replaced were left on the fixed asset schedule and continued to be depreciated over their 
original lives. Beginning in fiscal 2005, the entire remaining book value of  the fixed assets was recorded as depreciation expense  
at the time a store was replaced. 

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—

Including an amendment of  FASB Statement No. 115 (SFAS No. 159). SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure financial 
instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the 
opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having 
to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS No. 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning 
after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating SFAS No. 159 to 
determine the impact, if  any, on the financial statements. 

Reclassifications Certain amounts in the prior years’ financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 

current-year presentation. At April 30, 2006, unearned revenue of  $1,360 was recorded as a reduction of  receivables and is now 
included in other accrued expenses. The sales and cost of  goods sold were reduced by $8,574 and $4,744, respectively, in fiscal 
2006 and fiscal 2005 for prepaid phone card and video rental commissions that were previously recorded as gross rather than as 
net commissions. 

2. 

BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS

On October 3 and October 4, 2006, the Company acquired the assets comprising the HandiMart convenience store 
chain that was owned by Nordstrom Oil Company and headquartered in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. The Company did not issue any 
stock for the transaction or acquire any stock of  the selling company. The trade name HandiMart is included in the assets purchased. 
The chain acquired consisted of  32 HandiMart convenience stores and 1 truck stop operated under the name Just Diesel. The 
convenience stores will continue to operate under the Handimart name for the present, though all have been converted to the 
Company’s system of  operation and Casey’s identifying signage is being incorporated into each of  them. These stores were  
acquired to increase Casey’s market presence within Eastern Iowa.

The HandiMart stores were valued using a discounted cash flow model that was done on a location by location basis. 
The model projects future cash flows and calculates a return on investment after capital expenditures and the purchase price is 
determined using a targeted rate of  return. The Company also engaged several third-party valuation experts to assist in assessing 
the fair market values of  the tangible and intangible assets. 

page 35

 
 
 
 
The acquisition was recorded by allocating the cost of  the assets acquired, including intangible assets and liabilities 
assumed, based on their estimated fair values at the acquisition date. The excess of  the cost of  the acquisition over the net of  
amounts assigned to the fair value of  the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed is recorded as goodwill. 

Allocation of  the purchase price of  $66,729 is as follows:

Assets acquired

   Inventories

   Prepaid expenses

   Land

   Building

   Equipment

   Leasehold improvements

Total assets

Liabilities assumed

   Accrued expenses

Total liabilities

Net tangible assets acquired, net of  cash

   Goodwill

   Other intangible assets

$

3,010 

132 

11,400 

12,250 

9,806 

1,250 

37,848 

(338)

(338)

37,510 

29,149 

70 

Total consideration paid, net of  cash acquired

$

66,729 

As of  April 30, 2007, the entire purchase price of  $66,729 has been paid in full. The Company also assumed leases 

of  the real estate comprising 11 of  the stores. The leases vary in the amount of  rent to be paid, the length of  the term, and the 
options available to the Company. The Company has capitalized 5 of  these leases with an aggregate present value of  $8,383 
that is included in leasehold interest in property and equipment and long-term debt. The remaining 6 leases are being treated as 
operating leases. 

The results of  operations of  the HandiMart stores from the dates of  acquisition through April 30, 2007 are included in 

the statement of  earnings and statement of  cash flows. 

The following unaudited pro forma information presents a summary of  the Company’s consolidated results of  operations, 
including the HandiMart convenience store chain acquired in October of  2006 as if  the transaction occurred at the beginning of  
the fiscal years (amounts in thousands, except per share data):

Year ended April 30, 

Total revenues

Earnings from continuing operations before gain
   or loss on discontinued operations and
   cumulative effect of  accounting change
Net earnings

Earnings per share

   Basic

   Diluted

2007

2006

4,111,366

$

3,676,090

64,413

62,762

1.24

1.24

$

$

$

$

65,433

62,683

1.25

1.24

$

$

$

$

$

page 36

 
 
 
Commencing January 5, 2006, the Company purchased 51 Gas ‘N Shop (GNS) convenience stores from a 

single-owner, 66-store chain headquartered in Lincoln, NE. The stores were purchased to increase substantially the 
Company’s presence in Nebraska. The Company issued no Casey’s stock nor did it acquire any GNS stock as part of  the 
transaction. The trade name Gas ‘N Shop was also acquired, but the stores not purchased in the transaction were allowed 
to operate under that name for two years or until their sale to another third party, whichever is sooner. The Company began 
rebranding the GNS stores to Casey’s General Stores immediately upon acquisition.

The GNS stores were valued using a discounted cash flow model that was applied on a location by location basis. The 

model projects future cash flows and calculates a return on investment after capital expenditures for rebranding to Casey’s.  
The purchase price was determined using a targeted rate of  return. 

The acquisition was recorded by allocating the cost of  the assets acquired, including intangible assets and liabilities 
assumed, based on their estimated fair values at the acquisition date. The excess of  the cost of  the acquisition over the net of  
amounts assigned to the fair value of  the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed was recorded as goodwill. The purchase  
price of  $29,194 was allocated as follows:

Land

Buildings

Equipment

Other assets

Goodwill

$  4,575

13,444

2,400

101

8,674

As of  April 30, 2007, principal payments of  $7,584 had been paid and the remaining $21,610 had been recorded in 
current maturities of  long-term debt. The Asset Purchase Agreement allows the seller to make an immediate sale of  any or all 
of  the stores or to lease any of  the stores to the Company for a period of  five years and grants to the seller an option at any time 
during that five-year period to require the Company to purchase any leased store and pay the applicable purchase price within 
forty-five days of  notice. As of  April 30, 2007, 18 stores had been purchased under the agreement and 33 were still being leased. 
The annual lease payments are equal to 6% of  the purchase price of  the stores leased and are paid monthly during the term of  
the lease. Lease payments of  $1,309 and $345 were paid during the years ended April 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and were 
recorded as interest expense. Any remaining principal balance must be paid by January 2011. 

The results of  operations of  the GNS stores from the date of  acquisition through April 30, 2007 and 2006 are included 

in the statement of  earnings and statement of  cash flows. Disclosure of  pro forma financial statements was considered  
inconsequential for the periods under audit.

3. 

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND LONG-TERM DEBT

A summary of  the fair value of  the Company’s financial instruments follows.

Cash and cash equivalents, receivables, and accounts payable  The carrying amount approximates fair value due to the 

short maturity of  these instruments or the recent purchase of  the instruments at current rates of  interest.

Long-term debt  The fair value of  the Company’s long-term debt excluding capital lease obligations is estimated based 

on the current rates offered to the Company for debt of  the same or similar issues. The fair value of  the Company’s long-term 
debt excluding capital lease obligations was approximately $216,000 and $126,000, respectively, at April 30, 2007 and 2006.

Interest expense is net of  interest income of  $1,321, $1,308, and $649 for the years ended April 30, 2007, 2006, and 

2005, respectively. Interest expense in the amount of  $284, $398, and $323 was capitalized during the years ended April 30, 2007, 
2006, and 2005, respectively.

page 37

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The next table delineates the Company’s long-term debt at carrying value.

April 30, 

2007

2006

Capitalized lease obligations discounted at 4.75% to 9.2% due in various monthly  

installments through 2048 (Note 7)

$  10,109

$  1,964    

Mortgage notes payable due in various installments through 2012 with interest at 6% to 

7%

33,247

37,033

7.38% senior notes due in 21 semi-annual installments beginning in December 2010

30,000

30,000

Senior notes due in various installments from 2004 through 2019 with interest at 6.18% 

to 7.23%

28,000

32,000

7.89% senior notes due in 7 annual installments beginning in May 2004

45,714

57,143

5.72% senior notes due in 14 installments beginning September 30, 2012 and ending 

March 30, 2020

Less current maturities

100,000

247,070

--------

158,140

47,566

51,628

$  199,504

$  106,512

Various debt agreements contain certain operating and financial covenants. At April 30, 2007, the Company was 

in compliance with all covenants. Listed below are the aggregate maturities of  long-term debt, including capitalized lease 
obligations, for the 5 years commencing May 1, 2007 and thereafter:

Years ended April 30,

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

Thereafter

$

$

47,566

19,972

11,767

14,678

4,499

148,588

247,070

Included in current maturities for fiscal 2008 in the preceding tables is $21,610 relating to the purchase of  the Gas ‘N 
Shop chain, which may be paid in future years. The seller has an option at any time to make an immediate sale of  any or all of  
the stores or to lease any of  the stores to the Company for a period of  five years from the original acquisition date. The seller also 
has an option at any time during that five-year period to require the Company to purchase any leased store and pay the applicable 
purchase price within forty-five days of  notice. The annual lease payments are equal to 6% of  the purchase price of  the stores 
leased and are paid monthly during the term of  the lease. See Note 2 for additional information regarding the purchase of   
Gas ‘N Shop.

page 38

4. 

PREFERRED AND COMMON STOCK

Preferred stock  The Company has 1,000,000 authorized shares of  preferred stock, none of  which has  

been issued.

Common stock  The Company currently has 120,000,000 authorized shares of  common stock. Dividends paid totaled 

$0.20, $0.18, and $0.195 per share for the years ended April 30, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. Historically, the Company 
recorded dividends at the time of  payment, which typically followed by several weeks the date on which dividends were declared. 
On May 1, 2004, the Company began recording dividends as of  the date of  declaration. As a result, the Company’s records show 
two quarterly dividends paid in the first quarter of  fiscal 2005, the first of  which ($0.035) was for the fourth quarter of  fiscal 2004 
and the second of  which ($0.04) was for the first quarter of  fiscal 2005.

Common share purchase rights  On June 14, 1989, the Board of  Directors adopted the shareholder Rights Plan,  
providing for the distribution of  one common share purchase right for each share of  common stock outstanding. The rights 
generally become exercisable ten days following a public announcement that 15% or more of  the Company’s common stock has 
been acquired or an intent to acquire has become apparent. The rights will expire on the earlier of  June 14, 2009 or redemption 
by the Company. Certain terms of  the rights are subject to adjustment to prevent dilution. Further description and terms of  the 
rights are set forth in the amended Rights Agreement between the Company and UMB Bank, n.a., which serves as Rights Agent.

Stock option plans  Under the Company’s stock option plans, options may be granted to non-employee directors, certain 

officers, and key employees to purchase an aggregate of  4,560,000 shares of  common stock. Options for 626,664 shares were 
available for grant at April 30, 2007, and options for 729,500 shares (which expire between 2007 and 2016) were outstanding.  
Any additional option share requirements in the future will require approval by the shareholders of  the Company. Additional 
information is provided in the Company’s 2007 proxy statement. 

On June 6, 2003, stock options totaling 307,000 shares were granted to certain officers and key employees. These 

awards were granted at no cost to the employee. These awards vested on June 6, 2006; subsequent to adoption of  FAS 123R, 
compensation expense was recognized ratably over the vesting period.

On July 5, 2005, stock options totaling 234,000 shares were granted to certain officers and key employees. These awards 
were also granted at no cost to the employee. These awards will vest on July 5, 2010, and compensation expense is currently being 
recognized ratably over the vesting period.

The 2000 Stock Option Plan grants employees options with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of  the  

Company’s stock on the date of  grant and expire ten years after the date of  grant. Vesting is generally over a three to five-year service 
period. The non-employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan grants directors options with an exercise price equal to the average of  the 
last reported sale prices of  shares of  common stock on the last trading day of  each of  the twelve months preceding the award of  the 
option. The term of  such options is ten years from the date of  grant, and each option is exercisable immediately upon grant. The 
aggregate number of  shares of  Common Stock that may be granted pursuant to the Director Stock Plan may not exceed 200,000 
shares, subject to adjustment to reflect any future stock dividends, stock splits, or other relevant capitalization changes. 

page 39

 
 
 
 
 
 
The following table shows the stock option activity during the periods indicated:

Balance at April 30, 2004

Granted 

Exercised

Forfeited

Balance at April 30, 2005

Granted

Exercised

Forfeited

Balance at April 30, 2006

Granted

Exercised

Forfeited

Number of
shares

     1,079,350 

          14,000 

       (173,950)

         (11,000)

        908,400 

        248,000 

       (178,850)

         (16,500)

        961,050 

          14,000 

       (223,550)

         (22,000)

$

$

$

Weighted 
average 
exercise price
12.80

15.80

10.89

14.08

13.20

20.51

11.96

14.46

15.29

22.36

13.16

14.80

Balance at April 30, 2007

        729,500 

$

16.10

At April 30, 2007, all outstanding options had an aggregate intrinsic value of  $6,602 and a weighted average remaining 
contractual life of  5.7 years. The vested options totaled 498,500 shares with a weighted average exercise price of  $13.98 per share and 
a weighted average remaining contractual life of  4.5 years. The aggregate intrinsic value for the vested options as of  April 30, 2007 
was $5,569. The aggregate intrinsic value for the total of  all options exercised during the year ended April 30, 2007 was $2,681, 
and the total fair value of  shares vested during the year ended April 30, 2007 was $1,232.

The fair value of  the 2007 stock options granted was estimated utilizing the Black Scholes valuation model. The grant 

date fair value for the May 1, 2006 options was $9.25. The significant assumptions follow:

Risk-free interest rate

Expected option life

Expected volatility

Expected dividend yield

May 1, 2006

4.88%

8.75 years

35%

1.17%

The option term of  each award granted was based upon historical experience of  employees’ exercise behavior. Expected 

volatility was based upon historical volatility levels and future expected volatility of  common stock. Expected dividend yield was 
based on expected dividend rate. Risk-free interest rate reflects the yield on the 8.75 year zero coupon U.S. Treasury.

Total compensation costs recorded for the year ended April 30, 2007 were $526 for the stock option awards. No  

compensation costs related to stock options had been recorded for the year ended April 30, 2006. As of  April 30, 2007, there  
was $897 of  total unrecognized compensation costs related to the 2000 Stock Option Plan for stock options that are expected  
to be recognized ratably through 2011.

page 40

 
 
At April 30, 2007, the range of  exercise prices was $11.20–$22.36 and the weighted average remaining  

contractual life of  outstanding options was 5.7 years. The number of  shares and weighted average remaining  
contractual life of  the options by range of  applicable exercise prices at April 30, 2007 were as follows:

Range of  exercise 
prices

$

11.20 – 13.07

14.08 – 15.80

17.64 – 22.36

Number of  shares

Weighted average 
exercise price

Weighted average remaining 
contractual life (years)

143,500

329,000

257,000

729,500

$

11.78

14.45

20.63

3.5

4.7

8.2

5. 

EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

Computations for basic and diluted earnings per common share are presented below:

Basic

  Earnings from continuing operations

  Loss on discontinued operations

  Cumulative effect of  accounting change

  Net earnings

  Weighted average shares outstanding—basic

  Earnings per common share from continuing operations

  Loss per common share on discontinued operations

  Cumulative effect of  accounting change

  Basic earnings per common share

Diluted

  Earnings from continuing operations

  Loss on discontinued operations

  Cumulative effect of  accounting change

  Net earnings

  Weighted-average shares outstanding—basic

  Plus effect of  stock options

  Weighted-average shares outstanding—diluted

  Earnings per common share from continuing operations

  Loss per common share on discontinued operations

  Cumulative effect of  accounting change

  Diluted earnings per common share

2007

2006

2005

63,542

$

63,218

$

1,651

--------

1,667

1,083

61,891

$

60,468

$

42,459

5,706

--------

36,753

50,467,739

50,309,929

50,114,695

1.26

$

1.25

$

.03

--------

.03

.02

1.23

$

1.20

$

63,542

$

63,218

$

1,651

--------

1,667

1,083

61,891

$

60,468

$

.84

.11

--------

.73

42,459

5,706

--------

36,753

50,467,739

200,159

50,667,898

50,309,929

300,335

50,610,264

50,114,695

169,488

50,284,183

1.25

$

1.24

$

.03

--------

.03

.02

1.22

$

1.19

$

.84

.11

--------

.73

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

page 41

6. 

INCOME TAXES

Income tax expense attributable to earnings from continuing operations consisted of  the following components:

Current tax expense

   Federal

   State

Deferred tax expense

Total income tax provision

Years ended April 30,

2007

2006

2005

$

$

31,917 

2,788 

34,705 

(500)

34,205 

$

       35,649 

$

         15,402

         3,641 

       39,290 

(3,937)

           2,192

         17,594

           7,311

$

       35,353 

$

         24,905

The tax effects of  temporary differences that gave rise to significant portions of  the deferred tax assets and deferred tax 

liabilities were as follows:

Deferred tax assets

   Accrued liabilities

   Deferred compensation

   Other

     Total gross deferred tax assets

   Valuation allowance

Net deferred tax assets

Deferred tax liabilities
   Excess of  tax over book 
     depreciation
   Other

     Total gross deferred tax liabilities

Net deferred tax liability

$

Years ended April 30,

  2007

2006

2005

$

           7,414 

$

         6,373 

$

          5,047 

           3,589 

               982 

         11,985 

(186) 

         11,799 

(109,146)

(1,749)

(110,895)

(99,096)

         3,073 

          1,523 

        10,969 

(184)

        10,785 

          2,551 

             351 

          7,949 

-------- 

          7,949 

(103,094)

(1,484)

(104,578)

(93,793)

$

(104,754)

(1,614)

(106,368)

(98,419)

$

The deferred tax assets of  $6,628 and $6,136 relating to accrued liabilities are current assets and are included with 

prepaid expenses as of  April 30, 2007 and April 30, 2006, respectively. At April 30, 2007, the Company has net operating loss 
carryforwards for state income tax purposes of  approximately $13,532, which are available to offset future taxable income. These 
net operating losses expire during the years 2015 through 2018.

The valuation allowance for deferred tax assets as of  April 30, 2007 and 2006 was $186 and $184, respectively. The net 

change in the valuation allowance for the years ended April 30, 2007 and 2006 was an increase of  $2 and $184, respectively. In 
assessing the realizability of  deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion of  the 
deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of  deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of  future 
taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled 
reversal of  deferred tax liabilities, projected taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. A valuation 
allowance has been established for a portion of  the amount of  net operating loss carryovers—state taxes as of  April 30, 2007 due 
to the uncertainty of  future recoverability. As time passes, management will be able to better assess the amount of  tax benefit it 
will realize from using the carryforwards.

page 42

 
Total reported tax expense applicable to the Company’s continuing operations varies from the tax that would 

have resulted from applying the statutory U.S. federal income tax rates to income before income taxes.

Income taxes at the statutory rates

Federal tax credits
State income taxes, net of  federal tax
  benefit
Other

2007

        35.0%

         (0.8)

          1.5
         (0.7)

        35.0%

Years ended April 30,

2006

       35.0%

        (0.7)

         1.4
         0.2

       35.9%

2005

       35.0%

       (0.9)

        2.5
        0.4

      37.0%

The income tax benefit from discontinued operations was $1,055, $1,065, and $3,648 for the years ended  

April 30, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. The income tax benefit from the cumulative effect of  accounting change  
was $692 for the year ended April 30, 2007.

7. 

LEASES

The Company leases certain property and equipment used in its operations. Generally, the leases are for primary terms 

of  from five to twenty years with options either to renew for additional periods or to purchase the premises and call for payment 
of  property taxes, insurance, and maintenance by the lessee.

The following is an analysis of  the leased property under capital leases by major classes:

Real estate

Equipment

Less accumulated amortization

Asset balances at April 30,

2007

9,949

5,503

    15,452  

7,114

8,338

$

$

2006

2,929

3,995

6,924

6,113

   811

$

$

Future minimum payments under the capital leases and noncancelable operating leases with initial or remaining terms 

of  one year or more consisted of  the following at April 30, 2007:

Years ended April 30,
2008

$

2009

2010

2011

2012

Thereafter

Total minimum lease payments

     Less amount representing interest

Present value of  net minimum lease payments

$

Capital 
leases

Operating 
leases

$

$

1,264

1,247

896

594

356

15,089

19,446

9,337

10,109

597

452

316

108

52

73

1,598

The total rent expense under operating leases was $634 in 2007, $564 in 2006, and $598 in 2005.

page 43

 
8. 

BENEFIT PLANS

401(k) plan  Effective April 30, 2003, the Company merged its former employee stock ownership plan with its defined 
contribution 401(k) plan (Plan). The Plan covers all employees who meet minimum age and service requirements. The Company 
contributions consist of  matching amounts and are allocated based on employee contributions. Expense for the Plan was  
approximately $2,456, $2,258, and $2,149 for the years ended April 30, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.

On April 30, 2007, the Company had 6,954 full-time employees and 10,182 part-time employees, and 3,885 were  

participants in the Plan. As of  that same date, 2,012,319 shares of  common stock were held by the trustee of  the Plan in trust  
for distribution to eligible participants upon death, disability, retirement, or termination of  employment. Shares held by the  
Plan are treated as outstanding in the computation of  earnings per common share.

Supplemental executive retirement plan  The Company has a nonqualified supplemental executive retirement plan 
(SERP) for 3 of  its executive officers, 1 of  whom retired April 30, 2003. The SERP provides for the Company to pay annual 
retirement benefits, depending on retirement dates, up to 50% of  base compensation until death of  the officer. If  death occurs 
within twenty years of  retirement, the benefits become payable to the officer’s spouse until the spouse’s death or twenty years from 
the date of  the officer’s retirement, whichever comes first. The Company is accruing the deferred compensation over the expected 
term of  employment. The amount expensed in fiscal 2007, 2006, and 2005 was $763, $289, and $570, respectively.

9. 

COMMITMENTS

The Company has entered into employment agreements with 3 of  its executive officers. The agreements provide  
that the 3 officers will receive aggregate base compensation of  $1,500 per year exclusive of  bonuses. These agreements also 
provide for certain payments in the case of  death or disability of  the officers. The Company also has entered into employment 
agreements with 12 other key employees, providing for certain payments in the event of  termination following a change of   
control of  the Company.

10. 

CONTINGENCIES

Environmental compliance  The United States Environmental Protection Agency and several states have adopted laws 

and regulations relating to underground storage tanks used for petroleum products. Several states in which the Company does 
business have trust fund programs with provisions for sharing or reimbursing corrective action or remediation costs.

Management currently believes that substantially all capital expenditures for electronic monitoring, cathodic protection, 

and overfill/spill protection to comply with existing regulations have been completed. The Company has an accrued liability at 
April 30, 2007 and 2006 of  approximately $336 and $200, respectively, for estimated expenses related to anticipated corrective 
actions or remediation efforts, including relevant legal and consulting costs. Management believes the Company has no material 
joint and several environmental liability with other parties. Additional regulations or amendments to the existing regulations could 
result in future revisions to such estimated expenditures.

Legal matters  The Company is a defendant in several lawsuits arising in the normal course of  business. In the opinion 
of  management, the ultimate disposition of  these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated 
financial position and results of  operations.

The Company is named as a defendant in five lawsuits (“hot fuel” cases) brought in the federal courts in Kansas and 
Missouri against a variety of  gasoline retailers. The complaints generally allege that the Company, along with numerous other 
retailers, has misrepresented gasoline volumes dispensed at its pumps by failing to compensate for expansion that occurs when fuel 
is sold at temperatures above 60°F. Fuel is measured at 60°F in wholesale purchase transactions and computation of  motor fuel 
taxes in Kansas and Missouri. The complaints all seek certification as class actions on behalf  of  gasoline consumers within those 
two states, and one of  the complaints also seeks certification for a class consisting of  gasoline consumers in all states. The actions 
generally seek recovery for alleged violations of  state consumer protection or unfair merchandising practices statutes, negligent 

page 44

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
and fraudulent misrepresentation, unjust enrichment, civil conspiracy, and violation of  the duty of  good faith and fair 
dealing; and several seek injunction relief  and punitive damages. These actions are part of  a number of  similar lawsuits 
that have been filed in recent weeks in different states against a wide range of  defendants that produce, refine, distribute, 
and/or market gasoline products in the United States. On June 18, 2007, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation 
ordered that all of  the pending hot fuel cases be transferred to the District of  Kansas and assigned to the Honorable Kathryn 
H. Vratil for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings, including rulings on discovery matters, various pretrial motions, 
and class certification. Management does not believe the Company is liable to the defendants for the conduct complained of  and 
intends to contest the matters vigorously. 

On May 30, 2007, a complaint was filed against the Company in the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of  Iowa by two former employees against the Company, in which the claim is made that Casey’s failed to pay overtime 
compensation properly to two or more of  its assistant managers. Specifically, plaintiffs claim that the assistant managers were 
treated as nonexempt employees entitled to overtime pay, but that the Company did not properly record all hours worked and 
failed to pay the assistant managers overtime pay for all hours worked in excess of  40 per week. The action purports to be a  
collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (essentially equivalent to a class action) brought on behalf  of  all “persons 
who are currently or were employed during the three-year period immediately preceding the filing of  [the] complaint as ‘Assistant 
Managers’ at any Casey’s General Store operated by [the] Defendant (directly or through one of  its wholly owned subsidiaries), 
who worked overtime during any given week within that period, and who have not filed a complaint to recover overtime wages.” 
The complaint seeks relief  in the form of  back wages owed all members of  the class during the three-year period preceding the 
filing of  the complaint, liquidated damages, attorney fees, and costs. Management does not believe the Company is liable to the 
plaintiffs for the conduct complained of  and intends to contest the matter vigorously.

Other  At April 30, 2007, the Company was partially self-insured for workers’ compensation claims in all 9 states of  its 
marketing territory and was also partially self-insured for general liability and auto liability under an agreement that provides for 
annual stop-loss limits equal to or exceeding approximately $1,000. To facilitate this agreement, letters of  credit approximating 
$8,800 and $7,500 were issued and outstanding at April 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, on the insurance company’s behalf.  
The Company also has investments of  approximately $211 in escrow as required by 1 state for partial self-insurance of  workers’ 
compensation claims. Additionally, the Company is self-insured for its portion of  employee medical expenses. At April 30, 2007 
and 2006, the Company had $16,391 and $15,635, respectively, in accrued expenses for estimated claims relating to self-insurance.

page 45

 
 
11. 

QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA  (Dollars in Thousands) (Unaudited)

Net sales
  Gasoline
  Grocery & other merchandise
  Prepared food & fountain
  Other

Gross profit*
  Gasoline
  Grocery & other merchandise
  Prepared food & fountain
  Other

Net earnings from continuing operations
Loss (gain) on discontinued operations,
  net of  tax benefit (taxes)
Net earnings
Basic
  Earnings from continuing operations
  Loss on discontinued operations
  Net earnings per common share
Diluted
  Earnings from continuing operations
  Loss on discontinued operations
  Net earnings per common share

Net sales
  Gasoline
  Grocery & other merchandise
  Prepared food & fountain
  Other

Gross profit*
  Gasoline
  Grocery & other merchandise
  Prepared food & fountain
  Other

Net earnings from continuing operations
Loss on discontinued operations, net of  tax benefit 
Cumulative effect of  accounting change, net of  tax benefit
Net earnings
Basic
  Earnings from continuing operations
  Loss on discontinued operations
  Cumulative effect of  accounting change, net of  tax benefit
  Net earnings per common share
Diluted
  Earnings from continuing operations
  Loss on discontinued operations
  Cumulative effect of  accounting change, net of  tax benefit
  Net earnings per common share

$     17,089

17,161 

11,265

188

(11)

21

$     16,901

17,172 

11,244

Q1
$  799,480
225,206
65,682
5,226
$1,095,594

$     28,545
72,636
41,305
2,867
$   145,353

$         0.34
0.00
$         0.34

$         0.33
0.00
$         0.33

Q1
$   582,091
211,003
57,346
3,584
$   854,024

$     33,724
67,807
36,694
1,490
$   139,715

$     22,095
120
1,083
$     20,892

$         0.44
0.00
0.02
$         0.42

$         0.43
0.00
0.02
$         0.41

Year ended April 30, 2007
Q3
645,062
201,726
66,854
5,597
919,239

Q2
714,810 
216,336 
69,063 
5,568 
1,005,777 

Q4
721,702
209,544
65,674
5,800
1,002,720

28,492 
70,632 
42,539 
3,515 
145,178 

32,148
62,112
41,498
3,627
139,385

34,909
73,270
40,422
4,088
152,689

18,027

1,453

16,574

0.36
0.03
0.33

0.36
0.03
0.33

0.34 
0.00 
0.34 

0.34 
0.00 
0.34 

0.22
0.00
0.22

0.22
0.00
0.22

Year ended April 30, 2006
Q3
558,827
174,941
56,049
5,088
794,905

Q2
700,140 
197,810 
57,807 
3,847 
959,604 

Q4
637,676
183,720
57,323
4,543
883,262

38,900 
66,215 
37,345 
1,685 
144,145 

24,543
54,763
35,064
3,241
117,611

22,460 
267 
-------- 
22,193 

0.45 
0.01 
-------- 
0.44 

0.45 
0.01 
-------- 
0.44 

7,678
725
--------
6,953

0.15
0.01
--------
0.14

0.15
0.01
--------
0.14

28,276
58,239
34,933
2,622
124,070

10,985
555
--------
10,430

0.22
0.01
--------
0.21

0.22
0.01
--------
0.21

Year Total
2,881,054
852,812
267,273
22,191
4,023,330

124,094
278,650
165,764
14,097
582,605

63,542

1,651

61,891

1.26
0.03
1.23

1.25
0.03
1.22

Year Total

2,478,734
767,474
228,525
17,062
3,491,795

125,443
247,024
144,036
9,038
525,541

63,218
1,667
1,083
60,468

1.25
0.03
0.02
1.20

1.24
0.03
0.02
1.19

*Gross profit is given before charge for depreciation and amortization.

page 46

  
ITEM 9.  

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING  
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE 

None.

ITEM 9A. 

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES 

As of  the end of  the period covered by this report, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the 

participation of  the Company’s Chief  Executive Officer and Chief  Financial Officer of  the effectiveness of  the Company’s 
disclosure controls and procedures. On the basis of  that evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that the Company’s 
current disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in 
reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of  1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported 
within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. 

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth fiscal 

quarter covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal 
control over financial reporting. 

Management of  the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial 
reporting. The Company’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management 
and Board of  Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of  published financial statements. 

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems  

determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. 

The Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of  the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of  
April 30, 2007. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of  Sponsoring Organizations 
of  the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework. On the basis of  the prescribed criteria, management 
believes the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of  April 30, 2007.

KPMG, LLP, as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, has issued a report on its assessment of  

the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. This report appears on page 25. 

ITEM 9B. 

OTHER INFORMATION 

Not applicable.

page 47

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PART III

ITEM 10. 

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Those portions of  the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement appearing under the captions “Election of  Directors,” 

“Governance of  the Company,” “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” and “Executive Officers and Their 
Compensation” to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after April 30, 2007 and to be used 
in connection with the Company’s Annual Meeting of  Shareholders to be held on September 14, 2007 are hereby incorporated 
by reference.

The Company has adopted a Financial Code of  Ethics applicable to its Chief  Executive Officer and other senior financial 

officers. In addition, the Company has adopted a general code of  business conduct (known as the Code of  Business Conduct 
and Ethics) for its directors, officers, and all employees. The Financial Code of  Ethics, the Code of  Business Conduct and Ethics, 
and other Company governance materials are available on the Company Web site at www.caseys.com. The Company intends to 
disclose on this Web site any amendments to or waivers from the Financial Code of  Ethics or the Code of  Business Conduct and 
Ethics that are required to be disclosed pursuant to SEC rules. To date, there have been no waivers of  the Financial Code  
of  Ethics or the Code of  Business Conduct and Ethics. Shareholders may obtain copies of  any of  these corporate governance 
documents free of  charge by downloading from the Web site or by writing to the Corporate Secretary at the address on the  
cover of  this Form 10-K.

ITEM 11. 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

That portion of  the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement appearing under the caption “Executive Officers and Their 
Compensation” to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after April 30, 2007 and to be used 
in connection with the Company’s Annual Meeting of  Shareholders to be held on September 14, 2007 is hereby incorporated  
by reference.

ITEM 12. 

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT 
AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Those portions of  the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement appearing under the captions “Shares Outstanding,” 

“Voting Procedures,” and “Beneficial Ownership of  Shares of  Common Stock by Directors and Executive Officers” to be filed 
with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after April 30, 2007 and to be used in connection with the 
Company’s Annual Meeting of  Shareholders to be held on September 14, 2007 are hereby incorporated by reference.

ITEM 13. 

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND 
DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE 

That portion of  the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement appearing under the caption “Certain Relationships and 
Related Transactions” to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after April 30, 2007 and  
to be used in connection with the Company’s Annual Meeting of  Shareholders to be held on September 14, 2007 is hereby  
incorporated by reference.

ITEM 14. 

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

That portion of  the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement appearing under the caption “Independent Auditor Fees” 
to be filed with the Commission within 120 days after April 30, 2007 and to be used in connection with the Company’s Annual 
Meeting of  Shareholders to be held on September 14, 2007 is hereby incorporated by reference.

page 48

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PART IV

ITEM 15. 

EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES   

(a) 

Documents filed as a part of  this report on Form 10-K
(1) 

The following financial statements are included herewith:
Consolidated Balance Sheets, April 30, 2007 and 2006 
Consolidated Statements of  Income, Three Years Ended April 30, 2007
Consolidated Statements of  Shareholders’ Equity, Three Years Ended April 30, 2007
Consolidated Statements of  Cash Flows, Three Years Ended April 30, 2007
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Report of  Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
No schedules are included because the required information is inapplicable or is presented in the consolidated
financial statements or related notes thereto.
The following exhibits are filed as a part of  this report:

(2) 

(3) 

Exhibit
Number   

3.1(a) 

3.2(a) 

4.2 

4.4 

4.6 

4.7 

4.8 

Description of  Exhibits

Restatement of  the Restated and Amended Articles of  Incorporation (incorporated by reference from the Quarterly  
  Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 1996) 
Restatement of  Amended and Restated By-laws (incorporated by reference from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q 

for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 1997) and Amendments thereto (incorporated by reference from the Quarterly  

  Reports on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarters ended July 31, 1997 and July 31, 2000) 
Rights Agreement between Casey’s General Stores, Inc. and UMB Bank, n.a. as Rights Agent, relating to  
Common Share Purchase Rights (incorporated herein by reference from the Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed 
June 19, 1989 (0-12788)) and amendments thereto (incorporated by reference from the Form 8 (Amendment No. 1  
to the Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed June 19, 1989) filed September 10, 1990; the Form 8-A/A  
(Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed June 19, 1989) filed March 30, 1994; the Form 
8-A12G/A (Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed June 19, 1989) filed July 29, 1994,  
the Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 10, 1999; and the Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 27, 1999)

Note Agreement dated as of  December 1, 1995 between Casey’s General Stores, Inc. and Principal 
  Mutual Life Insurance Company (incorporated by reference from the Current Report on Form 8-K filed 
  January 11, 1996)
Note Agreement dated as of  April 15, 1999 among the Company and Principal Life Insurance Company  
  and other purchasers of  $50,000,000 Senior Notes, Series A through Series F (incorporated by reference from the   
  Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 10, 1999)
Note Purchase Agreement dated as of  May 1, 2000 among the Company and the purchasers of  $80,000,000 

in principal amount of  7.89% Senior Notes, Series 2000-A, due May 15, 2010 (incorporated by  
 reference from the Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 23, 2000)

Note Purchase Agreement dated as of  September 29, 2006 among the Company and the purchasers of   
  $100,000,000 in principal amount of  5.72% Senior Notes, Series A and Series B (incorporated by reference from

the Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 29, 2006)

page 49

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.19* 

Casey’s General Stores, Inc. 1991 Incentive Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference from the Registration 

Statement on Form S-8 (33-42907) filed September 23, 1991) and amendment thereto (incorporated by reference from 
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter January 31, 1994)

10.21(a)*   

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with Donald F. Lamberti (incorporated by reference from the 

10.22(a)*   

10.24(a)*   

10.27 

Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 10, 1997) and First Amendment thereto (incorporated by reference from 
the Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 2, 1998)

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with Ronald M. Lamb (incorporated by reference from the Current
Report on Form 8-K filed November 10, 1997), First Amendment thereto (incorporated by reference from the Current 
Report on Form 8-K filed April 2, 1998) and Second Amendment thereto (incorporated by reference from the Current 
Report on Form 8-K filed July 17, 2006)

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with John G. Harmon (incorporated by reference from the Current
Report on Form 8-K filed November 10, 1997), First Amendment thereto (incorporated by reference from the Annual  
Report on Form 10-K405 for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2001), Second Amendment thereto (incorporated by 
reference from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2004), and Third Amendment 
thereto (incorporated by reference from the Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 17, 2006)

Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the 
fiscal quarter ended July 31, 1994) and related form of  Grant Agreement (incorporated by reference from the Current 
Report on Form 8-K filed May 3, 2005)

10.28(a) 

Promissory Note delivered to UMB Bank, n.a. (incorporated by reference from the Current Report on Form 8-K filed 

October 4, 2005)

10.29 

Form of  “change of  control” Employment Agreement (incorporated by reference from the Quarterly Report on 

Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 1997)

10.30* 

Non-Qualified Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference from the Current Report on Form  

8-K filed November 10, 1997) and Amendment thereto (incorporated by reference from the Current Report on Form 8-K 
filed July 17, 2006)

10.31* 

Non-Qualified Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Trust Agreement with UMB Bank, n.a. (incorporated  

10.32* 

Severance Agreement with Douglas K. Shull (incorporated by reference from the Current Report on Form 8-K 

by reference from the Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 10, 1997)

filed July 28, 1998)

10.33* 

Casey’s General Stores, Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference from the Annual Report on 

Form 10-K405 for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2001) and related form of  Grant Agreement (incorporated by  
reference from the Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 6, 2005)

10.34* 

Casey’s General Stores 401(k) Plan (incorporated by reference from the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year  

ended April 30, 2003)

10.35* 

Trustar Directed Trust Agreement (incorporated by reference from the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year 

ended April 30, 2003)

10.37 

Description of  fiscal 2008 salary and bonus arrangements for Executive Officers (incorporated by reference from the 

Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 14, 2007)

10.38* 
21 
23.1 
31.1 
31.2 
32.1 
32.2 
______________________________

Executive Nonqualified Excess Plan Document and related Adoption Agreement dated July 12, 2006
Subsidiaries of  Casey’s General Stores, Inc. 
Consent of  Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Certificate of  Robert J. Myers under Section 302 of  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002
Certificate of  William J. Walljasper under Section 302 of  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002
Certificate of  Robert J. Myers under Section 906 of  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002
Certificate of  William J. Walljasper under Section 906 of  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002

*Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. 

page 50

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of  Section 13 or 15(d) of  the Securities Exchange Act of  1934, the registrant has 

duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf  by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 CASEY’S GENERAL STORES, INC.

(Registrant)

Date   June 28, 2007  

By 

/s/ Robert J. Myers
Robert J. Myers, President and
Chief  Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer and Director)

Date   June 28, 2007 

By 

/s/ William J. Walljasper
William J. Walljasper
Senior Vice President and Chief  Financial Officer
(Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of  the Securities Exchange Act of  1934, this report has been signed below by the  

following persons on behalf  of  the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Date   June 28, 2007 

Date   June 28, 2007 

Date   June 28, 2007 

Date   June 28, 2007 

Date   June 28, 2007 

By 

By 

By 

By 

By 

/s/ Robert J. Myers
Robert J. Myers
President and Chief  Executive Officer, Director

/s/ Ronald M. Lamb
Ronald M. Lamb
Chairman of  the Board, Director

/s/ Donald F. Lamberti
Donald F. Lamberti
Director

/s/ Kenneth H. Haynie
Kenneth H. Haynie
Director

/s/ John R. Fitzgibbon
John R. Fitzgibbon
Director

page 51

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Date   June 28, 2007 

Date   June 28, 2007 

Date   June 28, 2007 

Date   June 28, 2007 

By 

By 

By 

By 

/s/ Johnny Danos
Johnny Danos
Director

/s/ Patricia Clare Sullivan
Patricia Clare Sullivan
Director

/s/ William C. Kimball
William C. Kimball
Director

/s/ Diane C. Bridgewater
Diane C. Bridgewater
Director

page 52

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EXHIBIT INDEX

The following exhibits are filed herewith:

Exhibit No. 
10.38 

Description
Executive Nonqualified Excess Plan Document and related Adoption Agreement 
dated July 12, 2006

21 

23.1 

31.1 

31.2 

32.1 

32.2 

Subsidiaries of  Casey’s General Stores, Inc.

Consent of  Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Certification of  Robert J. Myers under Section 302 of  the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002

Certification of  William J. Walljasper under Section 302 of  the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002

Certificate of  Robert J. Myers under Section 906 of  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002

Certificate of  William J. Walljasper under Section 906 of  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002

page 53

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SUBSIDIARIES OF CASEY’S GENERAL STORES, INC.

Exhibit 21

1. 
2. 
3. 

Casey’s Marketing Company, an Iowa corporation
Casey’s Services Company, an Iowa corporation
Casey’s Retail Company, an Iowa corporation

All such subsidiaries are wholly owned by Casey’s General Stores, Inc. and do business under the above names.  Stores 

operated by Casey’s Marketing Company and Casey’s Retail Company do business under the name “Casey’s General Stores.”

page 54

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Exhibit 23.1

The Board of  Directors
Casey’s General Stores, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 33-19179, 33-42907, and 33-56977) on 

Form S-8 of  Casey’s General Stores, Inc. of  our reports dated June 28, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of  
Casey’s General Stores, Inc. and subsidiaries as of  April 30, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of  income, 
shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of  the years in the three-year period ended April 30, 2007, and management’s  
assessment of  the effectiveness of  internal control over financial reporting as of  April 30, 2007 and the effectiveness of  internal 
control over financial reporting as of  April 30, 2007, which reports appear in the April 30, 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K of  
Casey’s General Stores, Inc. 

Our report dated June 28, 2007, notes that the Company adopted the provisions of  Statement of  Financial  
Accounting Standards No. 123 (R) Share Based Payment and Securities and Exchange Commission Staff  Accounting Bulletin 
No. 108, Considering the Effects of  Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements during the  
year ended April 30, 2007. 

/s/KPMG LLP

Des Moines, Iowa
June 28, 2007

page 55

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CERTIFICATION OF ROBERT J. MYERS
UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Exhibit 31.1

I, Robert J. Myers, certify that: 

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of  Casey’s General Stores, Inc.;

1. 
2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of  a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of  the circumstances under which such statements were made, not  
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present  

in all material respects the financial condition, results of  operations and cash flows of  the registrant as of, and for, the  
periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and  

procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as  
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be 
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its 
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in  
which this report is being prepared;

(b)  designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to  
be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of  financial reporting  
and the preparation of  financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted 
accounting practices;

(c)  evaluated the effectiveness of  the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our  
conclusions about the effectiveness of  the disclosure controls and procedures, as of  the end of  the period covered  
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during  
the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the  
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of  internal control  
over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of  registrant’s board of  directors (or  
persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of  internal control over financial  

reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and  
report financial information; and

(b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in  

the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Dated   June 28, 2007 

/s/ Robert J. Myers
Robert J. Myers, President and
Chief  Executive Officer

page 56

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CERTIFICATION OF WILLIAM J. WALLJASPER
UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Exhibit 31.2

I, William J. Walljasper, certify that:

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of  Casey’s General Stores, Inc.;

1. 
2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of  a material fact or omit to state a material

fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of  the circumstances under which such statements were made, not   
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present   
in all material respects the financial condition, results of  operations and cash flows of  the registrant as of, and for, the  
periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and  

procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as    
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be 
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its 
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in  
which this report is being prepared;

(b)  designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to    
be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of  financial reporting   
and the preparation of  financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted 
accounting practices;

(c)  evaluated the effectiveness of  the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our  

conclusions about the effectiveness of  the disclosure controls and procedures, as of  the end of  the period covered    
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during   
the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the  
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of  internal control  

over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of  registrant’s board of  directors (or  
persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of  internal control over financial  

reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and  
report financial information; and

(b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in  

the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Dated   June 28, 2007 

/s/ William J. Walljasper
William J. Walljasper
Senior Vice President and 
Chief  Financial Officer

page 57

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of  Casey’s General Stores, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year 
ended April 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof  (the Report), I, Robert J. Myers, 
Chief  Executive Officer of  the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of  the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 
of  2002, that

(1) 

(2) 

The Report fully complies with the requirements of  section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the Securities 
Exchange Act of  1934.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
 and result of  operations of  the Company.

 /s/ Robert J. Myers

Robert J. Myers, President and
Chief  Executive Officer

Dated   June 28, 2007

page 58

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of  Casey’s General Stores, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended 

April 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof  (the Report), I, William J. Walljasper, 
Chief  Financial Officer of  the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of  the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 
of  2002, that
(1) 

The Report fully complies with the requirements of  section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the Securities 
Exchange Act of  1934.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and  
result of  operations of  the Company.

(2) 

/s/ William J. Walljasper
William J. Walljasper
Senior Vice President and Chief  Financial Officer

Dated   June 28, 2007

page 59

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
COMPARATIVE STOCK PERFORMANCE

The following Performance Graph compares the cumulative total share holder return on the Company’s Common Stock 
for the last five fiscal years with the cumulative total return of  (i) the Russell 2000 Index and (ii) a peer group index based on the 
common stock of  The Pantry, Inc. and Alimentation Couche Tard, Inc. (“Couche Tart”). Because the common stock of  Couche 
Tard  trades  only  on  the  Toronto  Stock  Exchange,  its  returns  have  been  calculated  by  taking  its  reported  financial  results  and 
converting them to U.S. currency equivalents, using the current exchange rate ($0.92 U.S. Dollars) on the date the Performance 
Graph was prepared (May 24, 2007). The cumulative total shareholder return computations set forth in the Performance Graph 
assume  the  investment  of   $100  in  the  Company’s  Common  Stock  and  each  index  on  April  30,  2002,  and  reinvestment  of   all 
dividends. The total shareholder returns shown are not intended to be indicative of  future returns.

COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL 
RETURN*
COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL 
COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
RETURN*
Among Casey’s General Stores, Inc., The Russell 2000 Index
Among Casey's General Stores, Inc., The Russell 2000 Index

Among Casey's General Stores, Inc., The Russell 2000 Index

$1,000

$1,000
$900

$900
$800

$800
$700

$700
$600

$600
$500

$500
$400

$400
$300

$300
$200

$200
$100

$100
$0

4/02

$0

4/02

4/03

4/03

4/04

4/04

4/05

4/05

4/06

4/06

4/07

4/07

Casey's General Stores, Inc.

Casey's General Stores, Inc.

Russell 2000

Russell 2000

Peer Group 

Peer Group 

              *$100 invested on 4/30/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of  dividends.

 Fiscal year ending April 30.

* $100 invested on 4/30/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends.
Fiscal year ending April 30.
Casey’s
* $100 invested on 4/30/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends.
100.00
Fiscal year ending April 30.
100.30
129.39
133.13
170.08
201.61

4/30/02 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4/30/03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4/30/04 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
4/30/05 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
4/30/06 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4/30/07 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Russell 2000
100.00
         79.24
112.53
117.83
157.27
169.59

Peer Group
100.00
149.81
342.33
517.26
911.59
793.67

page 60

 
 
we’re a convenience store 

and a whole lot more

Casey’s and community

At Casey’s, we believe giving is important. 

For us, generosity begins at home—in the 

communities we serve day in and day out. 

Our support is part of our approach to 

store operations and reinforces our 

commitment to our customers and our 

desire to be part of their daily lives. In 

2007, most of our donations went to 

support thousands of local projects and 

events across our marketing territory. 

Sometimes we joined with other businesses 

Our Web site at caseys.com is designed  

Families are the heart of Iowa baseball, 

to sponsor community improvement 

to be a practical tool. Viewers can rely on 

Midwest living, and Casey’s business. 

projects—a new gazebo on the town 

the complete nutritional information we 

They were also at the center of our 

square here, an updated baseball field 

publish regarding every prepared food 

television advertising campaign that 

there, fresh plantings in a park somewhere 

item we serve at our stores. We also use 

features families enjoying great food 

else. Often, we participated in local 

the site to provide quick access to Casey’s 

from a nearby Casey’s store. 

fundraising efforts for student trips or  

financial information, post job openings, 

high school celebrations by serving up 

and invite feedback from customers and 

Whether we’re updating a local library, 

Casey’s pizza and soft drinks for free or  

shareholders. Our CEO Bob Myers reads 

organizing a golf event for charity, or taping 

at discounted prices. 

and responds to every customer comment.

our latest television commercial, we’re 

In addition to financial support, Casey’s 

Casey’s is the 2007 official pizza maker of 

We’ve learned we perform better—and 

employees almost always contributed their 

the Iowa Cubs, our home state’s minor 

feel better—when we help our communities 

own enthusiasm and personal time in 

league baseball team; we’re in the stands 

prosper. That’s why we’re Casey’s, a 

support of their communities. 

and at our kiosks for every home game. 

convenience store and a whole lot more.

serving our shareholders’ interests. 

 
 
C
a
s
e
y
’
s
G
e
n
e
r
a

l

S
t
o
r
e
s
,

I

n
c

.

|

0
7
a
n
n
u
a
l

r
e
p
o
r
t

we’re a convenience store and a whole lot more

Casey’s General Stores, Inc.

One Convenience Blvd.  |  Ankeny, Iowa 50021-9437

07

annual 
report