MEETING THE NEEDS
OF OUR CLIENTS
We continue to focus on building client relationships
While adhering to our principles of sound credit under-
Writing and disciplined expense management. by staying
true to these principles, We seeK to remain as Well-
positioned as ever to fully serve and meet the needs of
our community.
Cathay General Bancorp
2010 Annual Report
BUILDING
CLIENT SUCCESS
For nearly 50 years, we at Cathay Bank have focused on:
• Listening to our clients and helping them to better understand their financial services needs;
• Offering innovative and effective solutions that can enable our clients to achieve their
financial goals;
• Providing convenience and value to clients through our extensive branch network;
• Combining the strength, access, and services of a large financial institution with the
personalized service and feel of a community bank;
• Conducting business with integrity and trust;
• Empowering our staff to strive for service excellence; and
• Celebrating our clients’ and our own success by helping to better the communities that
we serve.
1
LOCATED FOR
OUR CLIENTS
BELLEVUE
KENT
SEATTLE
BERKELEY-RICHMOND
CUPERTINO
DUBLIN
MILLBRAE
MILPITAS
OAKLAND
SACRAMENTO
SAN FRANCISCO
SAN JOSE
UNION CITY
ALHAMBRA
ARCADIA
CERRITOS VALLEY
CITY OF INDUSTRY
DIAMOND BAR
EL MONTE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY
IRVINE
LOS ANGELES
MONTEREY PARK
NORTHRIDGE
ONTARIO
ORANGE
ROWLAND HEIGHTS
SAN DIEGO
SAN GABRIEL
TORRANCE
WESTMINSTER
HONG KONG
SHANGHAI
TAIPEI
2
BROADWAY
CHICAGO CHINATOWN
WESTMONT
Cathay General Bancorp
2010 Annual Report
BROOKLYN
CHATHAM SQUARE
CHINATOWN
FLUSHING
MIDTOWN
SOHO
HOUSTON
PLANO
BOSTON
EDISON
3
Cathay General Bancorp
2010 Annual Report
DEAR FELLOW
STOCKHOLDERS:
The year 2010 was yet another challenging one for the U.S.
economy. Although the economy appeared to be stabilizing
by the end of the year, unemployment remained high and the
housing market continued to be weak. Despite governmental
fiscal and monetary stimulus to help strengthen the eco-
nomic recovery, 157 banks failed in 2010, representing a 12%
increase over the prior year, and reflecting continued uncer-
tainty in the banking sector.
In this challenging environment, our focus in 2010 at Cathay
General Bancorp and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Cathay
Bank, was to reduce our non-performing assets, increase
our core deposits, improve our net interest margin, and
return the company to profitability. At the same time, we also
focused on continuing to build client relationships and adher-
ing to our principles of sound credit underwriting and disci-
plined expense management. We are pleased to report that,
by and large, we accomplished these goals in 2010. We
reported net income of $11.6 million for 2010 compared to a
net loss of $67.4 million for 2009. Our non-performing port-
folio assets decreased $26.6 million, or 7.6%, to $325.1 mil-
lion and our net charge-offs decreased $92.9 million, or
42.4%,
from $219.3 million. These
decreases allowed us to lower our provision for credit losses
to $156.9 million compared to $307.0 million for the prior
year. Also, our coverage of non-performing loans improved
to 100% compared to 77% at the end of 2009. After four
consecutive quarters of losses beginning in 2009, we
returned to profitability in the second quarter of 2010, and
continued to build on that profitability, reporting net income
of $17.3 million in the third quarter and $18.1 million in the
fourth quarter. Our core deposits continued to grow, and we
ended 2010 with an increase of $210.5 million, or 6.6%.
to $126.4 million
The increase in core deposits allowed us to prepay $314 mil-
lion of our more expensive fixed-rate borrowings in the fourth
quarter of 2010 and improved our fourth quarter net interest
margin by 8.7%, or 23 basis points, to 2.88% compared to
2.65% the same quarter a year ago. One measure of a com-
pany’s soundness is its capital and Cathay General Bancorp
continued to exhibit a strong capital base. As of December
31, 2010, our Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 15.37%, total
4
risk-based capital ratio of 17.27%, and Tier 1 leverage capital
ratio of 11.44% continue to qualify us as a “well-capitalized”
institution.
Cathay General Bancorp became a public company on
December 14, 1990, when its stock was listed on NASDAQ.
On December 14, 2010, in celebration of the 20th Anniversary
of this important milestone, we were invited to ring the open-
ing bell at the NASDAQ MarketSite in New York, where the
Cathay Bank logo was proudly displayed for the day in Times
Square. The year 2010 also marked a continuation of our focus
on environmental sustainability. In January 2009, we moved
into our Corporate Center in El Monte, California. The build-
ing was designed and constructed to incorporate the latest
environmentally friendly concepts of using energy and water
in an efficient manner. In 2010, we further enhanced the
building’s environmental friendliness by installing a solar energy
system atop the Corporate Center’s carport. The carport holds
2,128 solar panels and is expected to reduce our energy con-
sump tion and carbon footprint by 40%.
In 2011, we intend to continue building on the achievements
we made in 2010 and to further improve the performance of
Cathay General Bancorp. Although there are still many chal-
lenges and uncertainties facing us in this volatile global envi-
ronment, we believe our company has survived and wea thered
the most severe recession since the Second World War and
perhaps in our generation. We could not have done this with-
out the support of our stockholders and colleagues to whom
we express our deep appreciation.
We look forward to a better 2011 and to celebrating our 50th
Anniversary with you in 2012.
DUNSON K. CHENG
PETER WU
Chairman of the Board,
President, and
Chief Executive Officer
Executive Vice Chairman
of the Board and
Chief Operating Officer
Cathay General Bancorp
2010 Annual Report
5
Cathay General Bancorp
2010 Annual Report
6
31%
REDUCTION IN ENERGY USE
47%
SAVINGS IN INTERIOR LIGHTING
15%
DECREASE IN EMPLOYEE COMMUTING MILES
65%
REDUCTION IN WATER USE
40%
REDUCTION IN ENERGY COSTS
Cathay General Bancorp
Cathay General Bancorp
2010 Annual Report
2010 Annual Report
ENVIRONMENTAL
SUSTAINABILITY
Cathay Bank strives to balance environmental responsibility, work place needs, and economics
at our El Monte Corporate Center facilities.
Site:
• Storm water run-off management system
minimizes storm water picking up debris,
chemicals, and dirt that can flow into storm
sewer system or lakes, streams, and rivers.
• Increased permeability of site buildings
reduces storm water run-off.
• Low-flow and waterless fixtures save water.
Energy:
• High performance envelope, such as roofs,
ceilings, exterior walls, windows, doors, etc.,
minimizes the transfer of thermal energy,
creating an energy efficient building.
• Motion and daylight sensors minimize the use
of unnecessary lighting.
• 100% outside air economizer eliminates
cooling loads during temperate winter months,
reducing the use of energy.
• Cool roof that delivers high solar reflectance.
Materials:
• Use of local materials reduces embodied
energy, or the sum total of the energy used in a
product life cycle, and transportation-related
carbon emissions.
• High recycled content of materials.
• Reuse of the original heating, ventilating, and air
conditioning units and elevators avoids embodied
energy use and carbon emissions associated
with producing new building elements.
Interior Environment :
• Floor-to-ceiling windows provide significant
daylight penetration.
• Views to the outside from numerous vantage
points contribute to employee well-being.
• Low volatile organic compounds contained in
paint finishes, carpets, and sealants improve
indoor air quality.
Practices:
• Long-term view on building strategy and design.
• Advanced building controls save energy and
modulate use of heating, ventilating, air condi-
tioning, and lighting only when needed.
• Flexible and adaptable interior fit-out, such
as the installation of ceilings, floors, furnishings,
etc., reduces waste associated with office
reconfiguration.
• Green operation and maintenance.
Solar Carport :
• Covered parking area for clients and staff has
2,128 solar panels that generate 695,181 kWh
clean energy annually, or the equivalent of
planting 2,364 trees each year.
7
7
Cathay General Bancorp
2010 Annual Report
FINANCIAL
HIGHLIGHTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
2010
2009
Amount
Percentage
Increase/(Decrease)
FOR THE Y EAR
Net income/(loss)
Net loss attrib utable to common stockholders
Net loss attrib utable to common stockholders
per common share
Cash dividends paid per common share
AT YEAR-END
Investment securities
Loans held-for-sale
Loans, net
Assets
Deposits
Stockholders’ equity
Book value per common share
PROFITABILITY RATIOS
Return on average assets
Return on average stockholders’ equity
CAPITAL RATIOS
Tier 1 capital ratio
Total capital ratio
Leverage ratio
$
$
11,565
(4,823)
(67,390)
(83,728)
$
78,955
(78,905)
(0.06)
0.040
(1.59)
0.205
(1.53)
(0.165)
$ 2,843,669
2,873
6,615,769
10,801,986
6,991,846
1,427,658
14.80
$ 3,550,114
54,826
6,678,914
11,588,232
7,505,040
1,304,244
16.49
$
(706,445)
(51,953)
(63,145)
(786,246)
(513,194)
123,414
(1.69)
117.2)%
(94.2)%
(96.2)%
(80.5)%
(19.9)%
(94.8)%
(0.9)%
(6.8)%
(6.8)%
9.5)%
(10.2)%
0.10%
0.81%
(0.58)%
(5.20)%
15.37%
17.27%
11.44%
13.55%
15.43%
9.64%
8
FORM
10-K
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
Í ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010
‘ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission file number 0-18630
Cathay General Bancorp
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
777 North Broadway,
Los Angeles, California
(Address of principal executive offices)
95-4274680
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
90012
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
(213) 625-4700
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $.01 par value
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes Í No ‘
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ‘ No Í
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes Í No ‘
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every
Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ‘ No ‘
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not
be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of
this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ‘
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller
reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
(Check one):
Large accelerated filer Í Accelerated filer ‘ Non-accelerated filer ‘ Smaller reporting company ‘
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ‘ No Í
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, computed by reference to the price at which
the common equity was last sold as of the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter (June 30,
2010) was $753,400,225. This value is estimated solely for the purposes of this cover page. The market value of shares held by Registrant’s
directors, executive officers, and Employee Stock Ownership Plan have been excluded because they may be considered to be affiliates of
the Registrant.
As of February 15, 2011, there were 78,618,984 shares of common stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
•
Portions of Registrant’s definitive proxy statement relating to Registrant’s 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders which will be
filed within 120 days of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, are incorporated by reference into Part III.
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP
2010 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Business. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 1.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Properties. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 2.
Legal Proceedings.
Item 3.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Removed and Reserved. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 4.
Executive Officers of the Registrant.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PART II . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Selected Financial Data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 6.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
Item 8.
Item 9.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 9B. Other Information. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PART III . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 11. Executive Compensation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Item 12.
Stockholder Matters.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PART IV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SIGNATURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3
3
24
38
38
39
39
39
40
40
42
43
80
82
82
83
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
86
86
91
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-1
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-3
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/
(LOSS)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-4
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-5
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-7
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-9
Forward-Looking Statements
In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the term “Bancorp” refers to Cathay General Bancorp and the term
“Bank” refers to Cathay Bank. The terms “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Bancorp and the Bank
collectively. The statements in this report include forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
applicable provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 regarding management’s beliefs,
projections, and assumptions concerning future results and events. We intend such forward-looking statements to
be covered by the safe harbor provision for forward-looking statements in these provisions. All statements other
than statements of historical fact are “forward-looking statements” for purposes of federal and state securities
laws, including statements about anticipated future operating and financial performance, financial position and
liquidity, growth opportunities and growth rates, growth plans, acquisition and divestiture opportunities,
business prospects, strategic alternatives, business strategies, financial expectations, regulatory and competitive
outlook, investment and expenditure plans, financing needs and availability, and other similar forecasts and
statements of expectation and statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. Words such as “aims,”
“anticipates,” “believes,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “hopes,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “projects,”
“seeks,” “shall,” “should,” “will,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue,” and variations of these words and
similar expressions are intended to identify these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements by us
are based on estimates, beliefs, projections, and assumptions of management and are not guarantees of future
performance. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause
actual results to differ materially from our historical experience and our present expectations or projections.
Such risks and uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited to, adverse developments or conditions
related to or arising from:
• U.S. and international economic and market conditions;
• market disruption and volatility;
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
current and potential future supervisory action by bank supervisory authorities and changes in laws and
regulations, or their interpretations;
restrictions on dividends and other distributions by laws and regulations and by our regulators and our
capital structure;
credit losses and deterioration in asset or credit quality;
availability of capital;
potential goodwill impairment;
liquidity risk;
fluctuations in interest rates;
past and future acquisitions;
inflation and deflation;
success of expansion, if any, of our business in new markets;
the soundness of other financial institutions;
real estate market conditions;
our ability to compete with competitors;
increased costs of compliance and other risks associated with changes in regulation and the current
regulatory environment, including the requirements of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), the potential for substantial changes in the legal,
regulatory, and enforcement framework and oversight applicable to financial institutions in reaction to
recent adverse financial market events, including changes pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act;
1
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
the short term and long term impact of the Basel II and the proposed Basel III capital standards of the
Basel Committee;
our ability to retain key personnel;
successful management of reputational risk;
natural disasters and geopolitical events;
general economic or business conditions in California, Asia and other regions where the Bank has
operations;
restrictions on compensation paid to our executives as a result of our participation in the TARP Capital
Purchase Program;
our ability to adapt our information technology systems; and
changes in accounting standards or tax laws and regulations.
These and other factors are further described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (at Item 1A in
particular), the Company’s other reports filed with the SEC and other filings the Company makes with the SEC
from time to time. Actual results in any future period may also vary from the past results discussed in this report.
Given these risks and uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking
statements, which speak to the date of this report. We have no intention and undertake no obligation to update
any forward-looking statement or to publicly announce any revision of any forward-looking statement to reflect
future developments or events, except as required by law.
2
PART I
Item 1. Business.
Business of Bancorp
Overview
Cathay General Bancorp is a corporation that was organized in 1990 under the laws of the State of
Delaware. We are the holding company of Cathay Bank, a California state-chartered commercial bank (“Cathay
Bank” or the “Bank”), six limited partnerships investing in affordable housing investments in which the Bank is
the sole limited partner, and GBC Venture Capital, Inc. We also own 100% of the common stock of five statutory
business trusts created for the purpose of issuing capital securities. In the future, we may become an operating
company or acquire savings institutions, other banks, or companies engaged in bank-related activities and may
engage in or acquire such other businesses, or activities as may be permitted by applicable law. Our principal
place of business is currently located at 777 North Broadway, Los Angeles, California 90012, and our telephone
number at that location is (213) 625-4700. In addition, certain of our administrative offices are located in El
Monte, California and our address there is 9650 Flair Drive, El Monte, California 91731. Our common stock is
traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market and our trading symbol is “CATY”.
We are regulated as a bank holding company by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, or
Federal Reserve Board. Cathay Bank is regulated as a California commercial bank by the California Department
of Financial Institutions, or DFI, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or FDIC.
Subsidiaries of Bancorp
In addition to its wholly-owned bank subsidiary, the Bancorp has the following subsidiaries:
Cathay Capital Trust I, Cathay Statutory Trust I, Cathay Capital Trust II, Cathay Capital Trust III and
Cathay Capital Trust IV. The Bancorp established Cathay Capital Trust I in June 2003, Cathay Statutory Trust I
in September 2003, Cathay Capital Trust II in December 2003, Cathay Capital Trust III in March 2007, and
Cathay Capital Trust IV in May 2007 (collectively, the “Trusts”) as wholly owned subsidiaries. The Trusts are
statutory business trusts. The Trusts issued capital securities representing undivided preferred beneficial interests
in the assets of the Trusts. The Trusts exist for the purpose of issuing the capital securities and investing the
proceeds thereof, together with proceeds from the purchase of the common securities of the Trusts by the
Bancorp, in Junior Subordinated Notes issued by the Bancorp. The Bancorp guarantees, on a limited basis,
payments of distributions on the capital securities of the Trusts and payments on redemption of the capital
securities of the Trusts. The Bancorp is the owner of all the beneficial interests represented by the common
securities of the Trusts. The purpose of issuing the capital securities was to provide the Company with a cost-
effective means of obtaining Tier 1 Capital for regulatory purposes. Because the Bancorp is not the primary
beneficiary of the Trusts, the financial statements of the Trusts are not included in the consolidated financial
statements of the Company.
GBC Venture Capital, Inc. The business purpose of GBC Venture Capital, Inc. is to hold equity interests
(such as options or warrants) received as part of business relationships and to make equity investments in
companies and limited partnerships subject to applicable regulatory restrictions.
Competition
Our primary business is to act as the holding company for the Bank. Accordingly, we face the same
competitive pressures as those expected by the Bank. For a discussion of those risks, see “Business of the Bank
— Competition” below under this Item 1.
3
Employees
Due to the limited nature of the Bancorp’s activities as a bank holding company, the Bancorp currently does
not employ any persons other than Bancorp’s management, which includes the Chief Executive Officer and
President, the Chief Operating Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice Presidents, the Secretary,
Assistant Secretary, and the General Counsel. See also “Business of the Bank — Employees” below under this
Item 1.
Business of the Bank
General
Cathay Bank was incorporated under the laws of the State of California on August 22, 1961, was licensed by
the California Department of Financial Institutions (previously known as the California State Banking
Department) (“DFI”), and commenced operations as a California state-chartered bank on April 19, 1962. Cathay
Bank is an insured bank under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act by the FDIC, but it is not a member of the
Federal Reserve System.
The Bank’s head office is located in the Chinatown area of Los Angeles, at 777 North Broadway, Los
Angeles, California 90012. In addition, as of December 31, 2010, the Bank had branch offices in Southern
California (20 branches), Northern California (11 branches), New York (eight branches), Massachusetts (one
branch), Texas (two branches), Washington (three branches), Illinois (three branch locations and one drive-
through location), New Jersey (one branch), and Hong Kong (one branch) and a representative office in Shanghai
and in Taipei. Deposit accounts at the Hong Kong branch are not insured by the FDIC. Each branch has loan
approval rights subject to the branch manager’s authorized lending limits. Current activities of the Shanghai and
Taipei representative offices are limited to coordinating the transportation of documents to the Bank’s head
office and performing liaison services.
Our primary market area is defined by the Community Reinvestment Act delineation, which includes the
contiguous areas surrounding each of the Bank’s branch offices. It is the Bank’s policy to reach out and actively
offer services to low and moderate income groups in the delineated branch service areas. Many of the Bank’s
employees speak both English and one or more Chinese dialects or Vietnamese, and are thus able to serve the
Bank’s Chinese, Vietnamese, and English speaking customers.
As a commercial bank, the Bank accepts checking, savings, and time deposits, and makes commercial, real
estate, personal, home improvement, automobile, and other installment and term loans. From time to time, the
Bank invests available funds in other interest-earning assets, such as U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. government
agency securities, state and municipal securities, mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities, corporate
bonds, and other security investments. The Bank also provides letters of credit, wire transfers, forward currency
spot and forward contracts, traveler’s checks, safe deposit, night deposit, Social Security payment deposit,
collection, bank-by-mail, drive-up and walk-up windows, automatic teller machines (“ATM”), Internet banking
services, and other customary bank services.
The Bank primarily services individuals, professionals, and small to medium-sized businesses in the local
markets in which its branches are located and provides commercial mortgage loans, commercial loans, Small
Business Administration (“SBA”) loans, residential mortgage loans, real estate construction loans, equity lines of
credit, and installment loans to individuals for automobile, household, and other consumer expenditures.
Through Cathay Wealth Management, the Bank provides its customers the ability to trade stocks online and
to purchase mutual funds, annuities, equities, bonds, and short-term money market instruments. All securities and
insurance products provided by Cathay Wealth Management are offered by, and all Financial Consultants are
registered with, PrimeVest Financial Services, a registered securities broker/dealer and licensed insurance agency
and member of the FINRA and SIPC. PrimeVest Financial Services and Cathay Bank are independent entities.
These products are not insured by the FDIC.
4
Securities
The Bank’s securities portfolio is managed in accordance with a written Investment Policy which addresses
strategies, types, and levels of allowable investments, and which is reviewed and approved by our Board of
Directors on an annual basis.
Our investment portfolio is managed to meet our liquidity needs through proceeds from scheduled
maturities and is also utilized for pledging requirements for deposits of state and local subdivisions, securities
sold under repurchase agreements, and Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) advances. The portfolio is
comprised of U.S. government agency securities, mortgage-backed securities, collateralized mortgage
obligations, obligations of states and political subdivisions, corporate debt instruments, and equity securities.
Information concerning the carrying value, maturity distribution, and yield analysis of the Company’s
securities portfolio as well as a summary of the amortized cost and estimated fair value of the Bank’s securities
by contractual maturity is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K at Part II — Item 7 — “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and in Note 4 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Loans
The Bank’s Board of Directors and senior management establish, review, and modify the Bank’s lending
policies. These policies include (as applicable) an evaluation of a potential borrower’s financial condition, ability
to repay the loan, character, existence of secondary repayment source (such as guaranties), quality and
availability of collateral, capital, leverage capacity of the borrower, regulatory guidelines, market conditions for
the borrower’s business or project, and prevailing economic trends and conditions. Loan originations are
obtained through a variety of sources, including existing customers, walk-in customers, referrals from brokers or
existing customers, and advertising. While loan applications are accepted at all branches, the Bank’s centralized
document department supervises the application process including documentation of loans, review of appraisals,
and credit reports.
Commercial Mortgage Loans. Commercial mortgage loans are typically secured by first deeds of trust on
commercial properties. Our commercial mortgage portfolio includes primarily commercial retail properties,
shopping centers, and owner-occupied industrial facilities, and, secondarily, office buildings, multiple-unit
apartments, hotels, and multi-tenanted industrial properties.
The Bank also makes medium-term commercial mortgage loans which are generally secured by commercial
or industrial buildings where the borrower uses the property for business purposes or derives income from
tenants.
Commercial Loans. The Bank provides financial services to diverse commercial and professional businesses
in its market areas. Commercial loans consist primarily of short-term loans (normally with a maturity of up to
one year) to support general business purposes, or to provide working capital to businesses in the form of lines of
credit to finance trade. The Bank continues to focus primarily on commercial lending to small-to-medium size
businesses within the Bank’s geographic market areas. The Bank participates or syndicates loans, typically more
than $20 million in principal amount, with other financial institutions to limit its credit exposure. Commercial
loan pricing is generally at a rate tied to the prime rate, as quoted in The Wall Street Journal, or the Bank’s
reference rate.
SBA Loans. The Bank originates U.S. Small Business Administration (“SBA”) loans under the national
“preferred lender” status. Preferred lender status is granted to a lender which has made a certain number of SBA
loans and which, in the opinion of the SBA, has staff qualified and experienced in small business loans. As a
preferred lender, the Bank’s SBA Lending Group has the authority to issue, on behalf of the SBA, the SBA
5
guaranty on loans under the 7(a) program which may result in shortening the time it takes to process a loan. In
addition, under this program, the SBA delegates loan underwriting, closing, and most servicing and liquidation
authority and responsibility to selected lenders.
The Bank utilizes both the 504 program, which is focused toward long-term financing of buildings and other
long-term fixed assets, and the 7(a) program, which is the SBA’s primary loan program and which can be used
for financing of a variety of general business purposes such as acquisition of land and buildings, equipment,
inventory and working capital needs of eligible businesses generally over a 5- to 25-year term. The collateral
position in the SBA loans is enhanced by the SBA guaranty in the case of 7(a) loans, and by lower loan-to-value
ratios under the 504 program. The Bank has sold and may, in the future, sell the guaranteed portion of certain of
its SBA 7(a) loans in the secondary market. SBA loan pricing is generally at a rate tied to the prime rate, as
quoted in The Wall Street Journal.
Residential Mortgage Loans. The Bank originates single-family-residential mortgage loans. The single-
family-residential mortgage loans are comprised of conforming, nonconforming, and jumbo residential mortgage
loans, and are secured by first or subordinate liens on single (one-to-four) family residential properties. The
Bank’s products include a fixed-rate residential mortgage loan and an adjustable-rate residential mortgage loan.
Mortgage loans are underwritten in accordance with the Bank’s and regulatory guidelines, on the basis of the
borrower’s financial capabilities, independent appraisal of value of the property, historical loan quality, and other
relevant factors. As of December 31, 2010, approximately 66% of the Bank’s residential mortgages were for
properties located in California.
Real Estate Construction Loans. The Bank’s real estate construction loan activity focuses on providing
short-term loans to individuals and developers, primarily for the construction of multi-unit projects. Residential
real estate construction loans are typically secured by first deeds of trust and guarantees of the borrower. The
economic viability of the projects, borrower’s credit worthiness, and borrower’s and contractor’s experience are
primary considerations in the loan underwriting decision. The Bank utilizes approved independent licensed
appraisers and monitors projects during the construction phase through construction inspections and a
disbursement program tied to the percentage of completion of each project. The Bank also occasionally makes
unimproved property loans to borrowers who intend to construct a single-family-residence on their lots generally
within twelve months. In addition, the Bank also makes commercial real estate construction loans to high net
worth clients with adequate liquidity for construction of office and warehouse properties. Such loans are typically
secured by first deeds of trust and are guaranteed by the borrower.
Home Equity Lines of Credit. The Bank offers variable-rate home equity lines of credit that are secured by
the borrower’s home. The pricing on the variable-rate home equity line of credit is generally at a rate tied to the
prime rate, as quoted in The Wall Street Journal, or the Bank’s reference rate. Borrowers may use this line of
credit for home improvement financing, debt consolidation and other personal uses.
Installment Loans. Installment loans tend to be fixed rate and longer-term (one-to-six year maturities).
These loans are funded primarily for the purpose of financing the purchase of automobiles and other personal
uses of the borrower.
Distribution and Maturity of Loans. Information concerning types, distribution, and maturity of loans is
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K at Part II — Item 7 — “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and in Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Asset Quality
The Bank’s lending and credit policies require management to review regularly the Bank’s loan portfolio so
that the Bank can monitor the quality of its assets. If during the ordinary course of business, management
becomes aware that a borrower may not be able to meet the contractual payment obligations under a loan, then
6
that loan is supervised more closely with consideration given to placing the loan on non-accrual status, the need
for an additional allowance for loan losses, and (if appropriate) partial or full charge-off.
Under the Bank’s current policy, a loan will generally be placed on a non-accrual status if interest or
principal is past due 90 days or more, or in cases where management deems the full collection of principal and
interest unlikely. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, previously accrued but unpaid interest is reversed
and charged against current income, and subsequent payments received are generally first applied towards the
outstanding principal balance of the loan. Depending on the circumstances, management may elect to continue
the accrual of interest on certain past due loans if partial payment is received or the loan is well-collateralized,
and in the process of collection. The loan is generally returned to accrual status when the borrower has brought
the past due principal and interest payments current and, in the opinion of management, the borrower has
demonstrated the ability to make future payments of principal and interest as scheduled. A non-accrual loan may
also be returned to accrual status if all principal and interest contractually due are reasonably assured of
repayment within a reasonable period and there has been a sustained period of payment performance, generally
six months. Information concerning non-accrual, past due, and restructured loans is included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K at Part II — Item 7 — “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations,” and in Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Non-Performing Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses. Information concerning non-performing loans,
allowance for credit losses, loans charged-off, loan recoveries, and other real estate owned is included in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K at Part II — Item 7 — “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations,” and in Note 5 and Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Deposits
The Bank offers a variety of deposit products in order to meet its customers’ needs. As of December 31,
2010, the Bank offered passbook accounts, checking accounts, money market deposit accounts, certificates of
deposit, individual retirement accounts, college certificates of deposit, and public funds deposits. These products
are priced in order to promote growth of deposits.
The Bank’s deposits are generally obtained from residents within its geographic market area. The Bank
utilizes traditional marketing methods to attract new customers and deposits, by offering a wide variety of
products and services and utilizing various forms of advertising media. From time to time, the Bank may offer
special deposit promotions. Information concerning types of deposit accounts, average deposits and rates, and
maturity of time deposits of $100,000 or more is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K at Part II —
Item 7 — “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and in
Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Borrowings
Borrowings from time to time include securities sold under agreements to repurchase, the purchase of
federal funds, funds obtained as advances from the FHLB, borrowing from other financial institutions,
subordinated debt, and Junior Subordinated Notes. Information concerning the types, amounts, and maturity of
borrowings is included in Note 10 and Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Return on Equity and Assets
Information concerning the return on average assets, return on average stockholders’ equity, the average
equity to assets ratio and the dividend payout ratio is included in Part II — Item 7 — “Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
7
Interest Rates and Differentials
Information concerning the interest-earning asset mix, average interest-earning assets, average interest-
bearing liabilities, and the yields on interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities is included in Part II —
Item 7 — “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
Analysis of Changes in Net Interest Income
An analysis of changes in net interest income due to changes in rate and volume is included in Part II —
Item 7 — “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
Commitments and Letters of Credit
Information concerning the Bank’s outstanding loan commitments and letters of credit is included in
Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Expansion
We have engaged in expansion through acquisitions and may consider acquisitions in the future in order to
compete for new deposits and loans, and to be able to serve our customers more effectively. We currently are
subject to restrictions on any new branches and business lines without prior approval from the DFI and FDIC due
to the memorandum we entered into with the DFI and FDIC on March 1, 2010.
Subsidiaries of Cathay Bank
Cathay Real Estate Investment Trust (“CB REIT”) is a real estate investment trust subsidiary of the Bank
that was formed in January 2003 to provide the Bank with flexibility in raising capital. During 2003, the Bank
contributed $1.13 billion in loans and securities to CB REIT in exchange for 100% of the common stock of CB
REIT. CB REIT sold $4.4 million in 2003 and $4.2 million in 2004 of its 7.0% Series A Non-Cumulative
preferred stock to accredited investors. During 2005, CB REIT repurchased $131,000 of its preferred stock. At
December 31, 2010, total assets of CB REIT were consolidated with the Company and totaled approximately
$1.47 billion.
GBC Real Estate Investments, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank. The purpose of this subsidiary
is to engage in real estate investment activities. To date, there have been no transactions involving this
subsidiary.
GB Capital Trust II (“GB REIT”) was incorporated in November 2001 to provide General Bank with
flexibility in raising capital. As a result of our merger with GBC Bancorp in 2003, the Bank owns 100% of the
voting common trust units issued by the GB REIT. The Bank dissolved GB REIT on October 22, 2010 as the
function of raising capital thru GB REIT is no longer needed.
Cathay Community Development Corporation (“CCDC”) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank and was
incorporated in September 2006. The primary mission of CCDC is to help in the development of low-income
neighborhoods in the Bank’s California and New York service areas by providing or facilitating the availability
of capital to businesses and real estate developers working to renovate these neighborhoods. In October 2006,
CCDC formed a wholly-owned subsidiary, Cathay New Asia Community Development Corporation
(“CNACDC), for the purpose of assuming New Asia Bank’s pre-existing New Markets Tax Credit activities in
the greater Chicago area by providing or facilitating the availability of capital to businesses and real estate
developers working to renovate these neighborhoods. CNACDC has been certified as a community development
entity and is seeking to participate in the U.S. Treasury Department’s New Markets Tax Credit program.
8
Cathay Holdings LLC (“CHLLC”) was incorporated in December 2007, Cathay Holdings 2 LLC
(“CHLLC2”) was incorporated in January 2008, and Cathay Holdings 3 LLC (“CHLLC3”) was incorporated in
December 2008. They are wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Bank. The purpose of these subsidiaries is to hold
other real estate owned in the state of Texas that was transferred from the Bank. As of December 31, 2010,
CHLLC owned one property with a carrying value of $3.5 million. CHLLC2 and CHLLC3 do not own property
at December 31, 2010.
Competition
We face substantial competition for deposits, loans and other banking services, as well as acquisitions,
throughout our market area from the major banks and financial institutions that dominate the commercial
banking industry. This may cause our cost of funds to exceed that of our competitors. These banks and financial
institutions have greater resources than we do, including the ability to finance advertising campaigns and allocate
their investment assets to regions of higher yield and demand and make acquisitions. By virtue of their larger
capital bases, they have substantially greater lending limits than we do and perform certain functions, including
trust services, which are not presently offered by us. We also compete for loans and deposits, as well as other
banking services, with savings and loan associations, brokerage houses, insurance companies, mortgage
companies, credit unions, credit card companies and other financial and non-financial institutions and entities.
The recent consolidation of certain competing financial institutions and the conversion of certain investment
banks to bank holding companies have increased the level of competition among financial services companies
and may adversely affect our ability to market our products and services.
In addition, current federal legislation encourages increased competition between different types of financial
institutions and has encouraged new entrants to enter the financial services market. Competitive conditions are
expected to continue to intensify as legislation is enacted which will have the effect of, among other things,
(i) eliminating historical barriers that limited participation by certain institutions in certain markets,
(ii) increasing the cost of doing business for banks, and/or (iii) affecting the competitive balance between banks
and other financial and non-financial institutions and entities. Technological factors, such as on-line banking and
brokerage services, and economic factors are also expected to increase competitive conditions.
To compete with other financial institutions in its primary service areas, the Bank relies principally upon
local promotional activities, personal contacts by its officers, directors, employees, and stockholders, extended
hours on weekdays, Saturday banking in certain locations, Internet banking, an Internet website
(www.cathaybank.com), and certain other specialized services. The content of our website is not incorporated
into and is not part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
If a proposed loan exceeds the Bank’s internal lending limits, the Bank has, in the past, and may in the
future, arrange the loan on a participation or syndication basis with correspondent banks. The Bank also assists
customers requiring other services not offered by the Bank to obtain these services from its correspondent banks.
In California, one larger Chinese-American bank competes for loans and deposits with the Bank and at least
two super-regional banks compete with the Bank for deposits. In addition, there are many other Chinese-
American banks in both Southern and Northern California. Banks from the Pacific Rim countries, such as
Taiwan, Hong Kong, and China also continue to open branches in the Los Angeles area, thus increasing
competition in the Bank’s primary markets. See discussion below in Part I — Item 1A — “Risk Factors.”
Employees
As of December 31, 2010, the Bank and its subsidiaries employed approximately 1,010 persons, including
385 banking officers. None of the employees are represented by a union. We believe that our employer-employee
relations are good.
9
Available Information
We invite you to visit our website at www.cathaygeneralbancorp.com, to access free of charge the
Bancorp’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and
amendments to those reports, all of which are made available as soon as reasonably practicable after we
electronically file such material with or furnish it to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). In
addition, you can write to us to obtain a free copy of any of those reports at Cathay General Bancorp, 9650 Flair
Drive, El Monte, California 91731, Attn: Investor Relations. These reports are also available through the SEC’s
Public Reference Room, located at 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 and online at the SEC’s website,
located at www.sec.gov. Investors can obtain information about the operation of the SEC’s Public Reference
Room by calling 800-SEC-0300.
Regulation and Supervision
General
The Bancorp and the Bank are subject to significant regulation and restrictions by federal and state laws and
regulatory agencies. This regulation is intended primarily for the protection of depositors and the deposit
insurance fund, and secondarily for the stability of the U.S. banking system. It is not intended for the benefit of
stockholders of financial institutions. The following discussion of statutes and regulations is a summary and does
not purport to be complete nor does it address all applicable statutes and regulations. This discussion is qualified
in its entirety by reference to the statutes and regulations referred to in this discussion. From time to time, federal
and state legislation is enacted which may have the effect of materially increasing the cost of doing business,
limiting or expanding permissible activities, or affecting the competitive balance between banks and other
financial services providers.
In response to the economic downturn and financial industry instability in recent years, legislative and
regulatory initiatives have been, and will likely continue to be, introduced and implemented, which could
substantially intensify the regulation of the financial services industry. We cannot predict whether or when
potential legislation or new regulations will be enacted, and if enacted, the effect that new legislation or any
implemented regulations and supervisory policies would have on our financial condition and results of
operations. Such developments may further alter the structure, regulation, and competitive relationship among
financial institutions, and may subject us to increased regulation, disclosure, and reporting requirements.
Moreover, Bank regulatory agencies have been very aggressive in the current economic environment in
responding to concerns and trends identified in examinations, and this has resulted in the increased issuance of
enforcement actions to financial institutions requiring action to address credit quality, liquidity and risk
management and capital adequacy, as well as other safety and soundness concerns.
Recent Developments
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
The landmark Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act financial reform legislation
(the “Dodd-Frank Act”), which was enacted on July 21, 2010, significantly revised and expanded the rulemaking,
supervisory and enforcement authority of federal bank regulators. Many of the regulations that have been
promulgated and are to be promulgated under the Dodd-Frank Act will impact our operations and costs. The
Dodd-Frank Act followed other legislative and regulatory initiatives in 2008 and 2009 in response to the
economic downturn and financial industry instability. The Dodd-Frank Act impacts many aspects of the financial
industry and, in many cases, will impact larger and smaller financial institutions and community banks
differently over time. It includes the following:
•
the creation of a Financial Services Oversight Counsel to identify emerging systemic risks and improve
interagency cooperation;
10
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
expanded FDIC authority to conduct the orderly liquidation of certain systemically significant non-bank
financial companies in addition to depository institutions;
the establishment of strengthened capital and liquidity requirements for banks and bank holding
companies, including minimum leverage and risk-based capital requirements no less than the strictest
requirements in effect for depository institutions as of the date of enactment;
the requirement by statute that bank holding companies serve as a source of financial strength for their
depository institution subsidiaries;
enhanced regulation of financial markets, including the derivative and securitization markets, and the
elimination of certain proprietary trading activities by banks;
the termination of investments by the U.S. Treasury under Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”);
the elimination and phase out of trust preferred securities from Tier 1 capital with certain exceptions;
a permanent increase of the previously implemented temporary increase of FDIC deposit insurance to
$250,000 and an extension of federal deposit coverage until January 1, 2013, for the full net amount
held by depositors in non-interesting bearing transaction accounts;
authorization for financial institutions to pay interest on business checking accounts;
changes in the calculation of FDIC deposit insurance assessments, such that the assessment base will no
longer be the institution’s deposit base, but instead, will be its average consolidated total assets less its
average tangible equity;
the elimination of remaining barriers to de novo interstate branching by banks;
expanded restrictions on transactions with affiliates and insiders under Section 23A and 23B of the
Federal Reserve Act and lending limits for derivative transactions, repurchase agreements, and
securities lending and borrowing transactions;
the transfer of oversight of federally chartered thrift institutions to the Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency and the elimination of the Office of Thrift Supervision;
provisions that affect corporate governance and executive compensation at most United States publicly
traded companies, including (i) stockholder advisory votes on executive compensation, (ii) executive
compensation “clawback” requirements for companies listed on national securities exchanges in the
event of materially inaccurate statements of earnings, revenues, gains or other criteria, (iii) enhanced
independence requirements for compensation committee members, and (iv) giving the SEC authority to
adopt proxy access rules which would permit stockholders of publicly traded companies to nominate
candidates for election as director and have those nominees included in a company’s proxy statement;
and
•
the creation of a Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, which is authorized to promulgate and
enforce consumer protection regulations relating to bank and non-bank financial products.
We cannot predict the extent to which the interpretations and implementation of this wide-ranging federal
legislation by regulations and in supervisory policies and practices may affect us. Many of the requirements of
the Dodd-Frank Act will be implemented over time and most will be subject to regulations implemented over the
course of several years. There can be no assurance that these or future reforms arising out of studies and reports
required by the Dodd-Frank Act will not significantly increase our compliance or other operating costs or
otherwise have a significant impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The Dodd-
Frank Act will likely result in more stringent capital, liquidity and leverage requirements on us or otherwise
adversely affect our business. As a result of the changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act, the profitability of our
business activities may be impacted and we may be required to make changes to certain of our business practices.
These changes may also require us to devote significant management attention and resources to evaluate and
make any changes necessary to comply with new statutory and regulatory requirements.
11
EESA and ARRA
Through its authority under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (“EESA”), as amended by
the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“ARRA”), the U.S. Treasury (“Treasury”) implemented
the TARP Capital Purchase Program (the “TARP CPP”), which was designed to bolster eligible healthy
institutions by injecting capital into these institutions. We participated in the TARP CPP so that we could
continue to lend and support our current and prospective clients. Under the terms of our participation, we
received $258 million in exchange for the issuance of preferred stock and a warrant to purchase common stock
and thereby became subject to various requirements, including certain restrictions on paying dividends on our
common stock and repurchasing our equity securities, unless the Treasury has consented.
In order to participate in the TARP CPP, financial institutions were required to adopt certain standards for
executive compensation and corporate governance. These standards generally apply to the Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer and the three next most highly compensated senior executive officers. The
standards include (i) ensuring that incentive compensation for senior executives does not encourage unnecessary
and excessive risks that threaten the value of the financial institution; (ii) requiring clawback of any bonus or
incentive compensation paid to a senior executive based on statements of earnings, gains, or other criteria that are
later proven to be materially inaccurate; (iii) a prohibition on making golden parachute payments to senior
executives; and (iv) agreement not to deduct for tax purposes executive compensation in excess of $500,000 for
each senior executive.
ARRA included a wide variety of programs intended to stimulate the economy and provide for extensive
infrastructure, energy, health, and education needs. ARRA imposes certain new, more stringent executive
compensation and corporate expenditure limits on all current and future TARP recipients until the U.S. Treasury
is repaid.
The executive compensation standards under ARRA include, but are not limited to, (i) prohibitions on
bonuses, retention awards and other incentive compensation, other than restricted stock grants which do not fully
vest during the TARP CCP period up to one-third of an employee’s total annual compensation, (ii) prohibitions
on golden parachute payments for departure from a company, (iii) an expanded clawback of bonuses, retention
awards, and incentive compensation if payment is based on materially inaccurate statements of earnings,
revenues, gains or other criteria, (iv) prohibitions on compensation plans that encourage manipulation of reported
earnings, (v) retroactive review of bonuses, retention awards, and other compensation previously provided by
TARP CCP recipients if found by the U.S. Treasury to be inconsistent with the purposes of TARP CCP or
otherwise contrary to the public interest, (vi) establishment of a company-wide policy regarding “excessive or
luxury expenditures,” and (vii) inclusion in a participant’s proxy statements for annual stockholder meetings of a
non-binding “Say on Pay” stockholder vote on the compensation of executives.
We have complied with the compensation provisions of TARP CPP and ARRA and have certified as to such
compliance in the exhibits attached to this report pursuant to Section 111(b) of the EESA. We do not plan to
repay the $258 million TARP CCP funds in the immediate future.
International Capital and Liquidity Initiatives
The International Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (the “Basel Committee”) is a committee of
central banks and bank supervisors and regulators from the major industrialized countries. The Basel Committee
develops broad policy guidelines for use by each country’s supervisors in determining the supervisory policies
they apply. In December 2009, the Basel Committee released two consultative documents proposing significant
changes to bank capital, leverage and liquidity requirements in response to the economic downturn to enhance
the Basel II framework which had not yet been fully implemented internationally and even less so in the United
States. The Group of Twenty Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors (commonly referred to as the
G-20), including the United States, endorsed the reform package, referred to as Basel III, and proposed phase in
12
timelines in November 2010. Basel III provides for increases in the minimum Tier 1 common equity ratio and the
minimum requirement for the Tier 1 capital ratio. Basel III additionally includes a “capital conservation buffer”
on top of the minimum requirement designed to absorb losses in periods of financial and economic distress; and
an additional required countercyclical buffer percentage to be implemented according to a particular nation’s
circumstances. These capital requirements are further supplemented under Basel III by a non-risk-based leverage
ratio. Basel III also reaffirms the Basel Committee’s intention to introduce higher capital requirements on
securitization and trading activities at the end of 2011.
Bank Holding Company Regulation
The Bancorp is a bank holding company within the meaning of the Bank Holding Company Act (“BHCA”)
and is registered as such with the Federal Reserve Board (“Federal Reserve”). It is also subject to supervision and
examination by the Federal Reserve and its authority to:
• Require periodic reports and such additional information as the Federal Reserve may require;
• Require bank holding companies to maintain increased levels of capital (See “Capital Adequacy
Requirements” below);
• Require that bank holding companies serve as a source of financial and managerial strength to
subsidiary banks and commit resources as necessary to support each subsidiary bank;
• Restrict the ability of bank holding companies to obtain dividends or other distributions from their
subsidiary banks;
•
Terminate an activity or terminate control of or liquidate or divest certain subsidiaries, affiliates or
investments if the Federal Reserve believes the activity or the control of the subsidiary or affiliate
constitutes a significant risk to the financial safety, soundness, or stability of any bank subsidiary;
• Require the prior approval of senior executive officer or director changes;
• Regulate provisions of certain bank holding company debt, including the authority to impose interest
ceilings and reserve requirements on such debt and require prior approval to purchase or redeem
securities in certain situations; and
• Approve acquisitions and mergers with banks and consider certain competitive, management, financial,
or other factors in granting these approvals in addition to similar California or other state banking
agency approvals which may be required.
The Federal Reserve’s view is that in serving as a source of strength to its subsidiary banks, a bank holding
company should stand ready to use available resources to provide adequate capital funds to its subsidiary banks
during periods of financial stress or adversity and should maintain financial flexibility and capital-raising
capacity to obtain additional resources for assisting its subsidiary banks. A bank holding company’s failure to
meet its source-of-strength obligations may constitute an unsafe and unsound practice or a violation of the
Federal Reserve regulations, or both. The source-of-strength doctrine most directly affects bank holding
companies where a bank holding company’s subsidiary bank fails to maintain adequate capital levels. In such a
situation, the subsidiary bank will be required by the bank’s federal regulator to take “prompt corrective action.”
See “Prompt Corrective Action Provisions” below.
Restrictions on Activities
Subject to prior notice or Federal Reserve approval, bank holding companies may generally engage in, or
acquire shares of companies engaged in, activities determined by the Federal Reserve to be so closely related to
banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto. Bank holding companies which elect
and retain “financial holding company” status pursuant to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (“GLBA”) may
engage in these nonbanking activities and broader securities, insurance, merchant banking and other activities
13
that are determined to be “financial in nature” or are incidental or complementary to activities that are financial
in nature without prior Federal Reserve approval. Pursuant to GLBA and the Dodd-Frank Act, in order to elect
and retain financial holding company status, a bank holding company and all depository institution subsidiaries
of a bank holding company must be well capitalized and well managed, and, except in limited circumstances,
depository subsidiaries must be in satisfactory compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”),
which requires banks to help meet the credit needs of the communities in which they operate. Failure to sustain
compliance with these requirements or correct any non-compliance within a fixed time period could lead to
divestiture of subsidiary banks or require all activities to conform to those permissible for a bank holding
company. The Bancorp has not elected financial holding company status and has not engaged in any activities
determined by the Federal Reserve to be financial in nature or incidental or complementary to activities that are
financial in nature.
The Bancorp is also a bank holding company within the meaning of Section 3700 of the California Financial
Code. Therefore, the Bancorp and any of its subsidiaries are subject to examination by, and may be required to
file reports with, the DFI.
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
The Bancorp’s common stock is publicly held and listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, and the
Bancorp is subject to the periodic reporting, information, proxy solicitation, insider trading, corporate
governance and other requirements and restrictions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the regulations of
the SEC promulgated thereunder as well as listing requirements of The NASDAQ Stock Market (“NASDAQ”).
The Dodd-Frank Act includes the following provisions that affect corporate governance and executive
compensation at most United States publicly traded companies, including the Bancorp: (1) stockholder advisory
votes on executive compensation, (2) executive compensation “clawback” requirements for companies listed on
national securities exchanges in the event of materially inaccurate statements of earnings, revenues, gains or
other criteria similar to the requirements of the ARRA for TARP CPP recipients, (3) enhanced independence
requirements for compensation committee members, and (4) SEC authority to adopt proxy access rules which
would permit stockholders of publicly traded companies to nominate candidates for election as director and have
those nominees included in a company’s proxy statement.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act
The Bancorp is subject to the accounting oversight and corporate governance requirements of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, including executive certification of financial presentations, requirements for board audit
committees and their members, and disclosure of controls and procedures and internal control over financial
reporting.
Bank Regulation
As a California commercial bank whose deposits are insured by the FDIC, the Bank is subject to regulation,
supervision, and regular examination by the DFI and by the FDIC, as the Bank’s primary federal regulator, and
must additionally comply with certain applicable regulations of the Federal Reserve. Specific federal and state
laws and regulations which are applicable to banks regulate the scope of their business, their investments, their
reserves against deposits, the timing of the availability of deposited funds, their activities relating to dividends,
investments, loans, the nature and amount of and collateral for certain loans, borrowings, capital requirements,
certain check-clearing activities, branching, and mergers and acquisitions. California banks are also subject to
statutes and regulations including Federal Reserve Regulation O and Federal Reserve Act Sections 23A and 23B
and Regulation W, which restrict or limit loans or extensions of credit to “insiders,” including officers directors
and principal shareholders, and loans or extension of credit by banks to affiliates or purchases of assets from
affiliates, including parent bank holding companies, except pursuant to certain exceptions and terms and
conditions at least as favorable to those prevailing for comparable transactions with unaffiliated parties.
14
Pursuant to the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (“FDI Act”) and the California Financial Code, California
state chartered commercial banks may generally engage in any activity permissible for national banks. Therefore,
the Bank may form subsidiaries to engage in the many so-called “closely related to banking” or “nonbanking”
activities commonly conducted by national banks in operating subsidiaries or subsidiaries of bank holding
companies. Further, pursuant to GLBA, California banks may conduct certain “financial” activities in a
subsidiary to the same extent as may a national bank, provided the bank is and remains “well-capitalized,” “well-
managed” and in satisfactory compliance with the CRA. The Bank currently has no financial subsidiaries.
Enforcement Authority
The Bank operates branches and/or loan production offices in California, New York, Illinois, Massachusetts,
Texas, Washington and New Jersey. While the DFI remains the Bank’s primary state regulator, the Bank’s
operations in these jurisdictions are subject to examination and supervision by local bank regulators, and
transactions with customers in those jurisdictions are subject to local laws, including consumer protection laws.
The Bank also operates a branch in Hong Kong and a representative office in Taipei and in Shanghai. The
operations of these offices (and limits on the scope of their activities) and the Hong Kong branch are subject to
local law and regulatory authorities in those jurisdictions in addition to regulation and supervision by the DFI and
the Federal Reserve.
The federal and California regulatory structure gives the bank regulatory agencies extensive discretion in
connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities and examination policies, including policies with
respect to the classification of assets and the establishment of adequate loan loss reserves for regulatory purposes.
The regulatory agencies have adopted guidelines to assist in identifying and addressing potential safety and
soundness concerns before an institution’s capital becomes impaired. The guidelines establish operational and
managerial standards generally relating to: (i) internal controls, information systems, and internal audit systems;
(ii) loan documentation; (iii) credit underwriting; (iv) interest-rate exposure; (v) asset growth and asset quality;
and (vi) compensation, fees, and benefits. Further, the regulatory agencies have adopted safety and soundness
guidelines for asset quality and for evaluating and monitoring earnings to ensure that earnings are sufficient for
the maintenance of adequate capital and reserves. If, as a result of an examination, the DFI or the FDIC should
determine that the financial condition, capital resources, asset quality, earnings prospects, management, liquidity,
or other aspects of the Bank’s operations are unsatisfactory or that the Bank or its management is violating or has
violated any law or regulation, the DFI and the FDIC, and separately the FDIC as insurer of the Bank’s deposits,
have residual authority to:
• Require affirmative action to correct any conditions resulting from any violation or practice;
• Direct an increase in capital and the maintenance of higher specific minimum capital ratios, which may
preclude the Bank from being deemed well capitalized and restrict its ability to accept certain brokered
deposits;
• Restrict the Bank’s growth geographically, by products and services, or by mergers and acquisitions;
•
Enter into or issue informal or formal enforcement actions, including required Board resolutions,
memoranda of understanding, written agreements and consent or cease and desist orders or prompt
corrective action orders to take corrective action and cease unsafe and unsound practices;
• Require prior approval of senior executive officer or director changes; remove officers and directors and
assess civil monetary penalties; and
•
Take possession of and close and liquidate the Bank or appoint the FDIC as receiver.
On December 17, 2009, the Company entered into a memorandum of understanding with the Federal
Reserve Bank of San Francisco (the “FRB SF”) under which we agreed that we will not, without the FRB SF’s
prior written approval, (i) receive any dividends or any other form of payment or distribution representing a
reduction of capital from the Bank, or (ii) declare or pay any dividends, make any payments on trust preferred
15
securities, or make any other capital distributions. Under the memorandum, we agreed to submit to the FRB SF
for review and approval a plan to maintain sufficient capital at the Bancorp on a consolidated basis and at the
Bank, a dividend policy for the Bancorp, a plan to improve management of our liquidity position and funds
management practices, and a liquidity policy and contingency funding plan for the Bancorp. In addition, we
agreed to notify the FRB SF prior to effecting certain changes to our senior executive officers and board of
directors and we are limited and/or prohibited, in certain circumstances, in our ability to enter into contracts to
pay and to make golden parachute severance and indemnification payments. We also agreed in the memorandum
that we will not, without the prior written approval of the FRB SF, directly or indirectly, (i) incur, renew,
increase or guaranty any debt, (ii) issue any additional trust preferred securities, or (iii) purchase, redeem, or
otherwise acquire any stock.
As part of our compliance with the memorandum, on January 22, 2010, we submitted to the FRB SF a
Three-Year Capital and Strategic Plan that updates a previously submitted plan and establishes targets for our
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio, total risk-based capital ratio, Tier 1 leverage capital ratio and tangible common
risk-based ratio, each of which, where applicable, are above the minimum requirements for a well-capitalized
institution.
On March 1, 2010, the Bank entered into a memorandum of understanding with the DFI and the FDIC
pursuant to which the Bank is required to develop and implement, within specified time periods, plans
satisfactory to the DFI and the FDIC to reduce commercial real estate concentrations, to enhance and to improve
the quality of the stress testing of the Bank’s loan portfolio, and to revise the Bank’s loan policy in connection
therewith; to develop and adopt a strategic plan addressing improved profitability and capital ratios and to reduce
the Bank’s overall risk profile; to develop and adopt a capital plan; to develop and implement a plan to improve
asset quality, including the methodology for calculating the loss reserve allocation and evaluating its adequacy;
and to develop and implement a plan to reduce dependence on wholesale funding. In addition, the Bank is
required to report progress to the DFI and FDIC on a quarterly basis. The Bank is also subject to a restriction on
dividends from the Bank to the Bancorp and is required to maintain adequate allowance for loan and lease losses
and is subject to restrictions on any new branches and business lines without prior approval. The Bank is required
to notify the FDIC and the DFI prior to effecting certain changes to our senior executive officers and board of
directors, is limited and/or prohibited, in certain circumstances, in its ability to enter into contracts to pay and to
make golden parachute severance and indemnification payments; and is required to retain management and
directors acceptable to the DFI and the FDIC. The Bank’s Board established a Compliance Committee to review
the Company’s management and governance and make recommendations to the Board.
There can be no assurance that either Bancorp or Bank will not become subject to further supervisory action
or regulatory proceedings.
Deposit Insurance
The FDIC is an independent federal agency that insures deposits, up to prescribed statutory limits, of
federally insured banks and savings institutions and safeguards the safety and soundness of the banking and
savings industries. The FDIC insures our customer deposits through the Deposit Insurance Fund (the “DIF”) up
to prescribed limits for each depositor. Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, the maximum deposit insurance amount
has been permanently increased to $250,000 and all non-interest-bearing transaction accounts are insured through
December 31, 2012. The amount of FDIC assessments paid by each DIF member institution is based on its
relative risk of default as measured by regulatory capital ratios and other supervisory factors. Due to the greatly
increased rate of bank failures experienced in the current period of financial stress, as well as the extraordinary
programs in which the FDIC has been involved to support the banking industry generally, the DIF was
substantially depleted and the FDIC has incurred substantially increased operating costs. On November 12, 2009,
the FDIC adopted a requirement for institutions to prepay in 2009 their estimated quarterly risk-based
assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of 2010, 2011, and 2012.
16
The Dodd-Frank Act also changes the base for FDIC insurance assessments to a bank’s average
consolidated total assets minus average tangible equity, rather than upon its deposit base alone, and requires the
FDIC to increase the DIF’s reserves against future losses. This will necessitate increased deposit insurance
premiums that are to be borne primarily by institutions with assets of greater than $10 billion. As required by the
Dodd-Frank Act, on October 19, 2010, the FDIC further addressed plans to bolster the DIF by increasing the
required reserve ratio for the industry to 1.35% (ratio of reserves to insured deposits) by September 30, 2020.
Current assessment rates will remain in effect until such time as the industry’s reserve ratio reaches 1.15%,
which the FDIC estimates will occur at the end of 2018. The FDIC also proposed to raise its industry target ratio
of reserves to insured deposits to 2%, 65 basis points above the statutory minimum, but the FDIC does not
project that goal to be met until 2027.
We are generally unable to control the amount of premiums that we are required to pay for FDIC insurance.
If there are additional bank or financial institution failures or if the FDIC otherwise determines, we may be
required to pay even higher FDIC premiums than the recently increased levels. These announced increases and
any future increases in FDIC insurance premiums may have a material and adverse affect on our earnings and
could have a material adverse effect on the value of, or market for, our common stock.
All FDIC-insured institutions are also required to pay assessments to the FDIC to fund interest payments on
bonds issued by the Financing Corporation (““FICO”“), an agency of the federal government established to
recapitalize the predecessor to the DIF. These assessments will continue until the FICO bonds mature in 2017.
The FICO assessment rates, which are determined quarterly, were 0.01060% of insured deposits for the first
quarter of fiscal 2010 and 0.01040% of insured deposits for each of the last three quarters of fiscal 2010.
The FDIC may terminate a depository institution’s deposit insurance upon a finding that the institution’s
financial condition is unsafe or unsound or that the institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices that
pose a risk to the DIF or that may prejudice the interest of the bank’s depositors. The termination of deposit
insurance for a bank would also result in the revocation of the bank’s charter by the DFI.
Capital Adequacy Requirements
Bank holding companies and banks are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by
state and federal banking agencies. Increased capital requirements are expected as a result of expanded authority
set forth in the Dodd-Frank Act and international supervisory developments. Capital adequacy guidelines and,
additionally for banks, prompt corrective action regulations involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities,
and certain off-balance sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and
classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators about components, risk weighting, and
other factors. At December 31, 2010, the Company’s and the Bank’s capital ratios exceeded the minimum capital
adequacy guideline percentage requirements of the federal banking agencies for “well capitalized” institutions.
See “Capital Resources—Capital Adequacy” in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations” in Part II—Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The federal banking agencies have adopted risk-based capital guidelines for bank holding companies and
banks that are expected to provide a measure of capital that reflects the degree of risk associated with a banking
organization’s operations for both transactions reported on the balance sheet as assets, such as loans, and those
recorded as off-balance sheet items, such as commitments, letters of credit, and recourse arrangements. The risk-
based capital ratio is determined by classifying assets and certain off-balance sheet financial instruments into
weighted categories, with higher levels of capital being required for those categories perceived as representing
greater risks and dividing its qualifying capital by its total risk-adjusted assets and off-balance sheet items. Bank
holding companies and banks engaged in significant trading activity may also be subject to the market risk
capital guidelines and be required to incorporate additional market and interest rate risk components into their
risk-based capital standards.
17
Qualifying capital is classified depending on the type of capital:
•
•
•
“Tier I capital” currently includes common equity and trust preferred securities, subject to certain
criteria and quantitative limits. The capital received from the Series B Preferred Stock offering also
qualifies as Tier I capital. Under the Dodd-Frank Act, depository institution holding companies with
more than $15 billion in total consolidated assets as of December 31, 2009, will no longer be able to
include trust preferred securities as Tier 1 regulatory capital as of the end of a phase-out period in 2016,
and will be obligated to replace any outstanding trust preferred securities issued prior to May 19, 2010,
with qualifying Tier 1 regulatory capital during the phase-out period.
“Tier II capital” includes hybrid capital instruments, other qualifying debt instruments, a limited amount
of the allowance for loan and lease losses, and a limited amount of unrealized holding gains on equity
securities. Following the phase-out period under the Dodd-Frank Act, trust preferred securities will be
treated as Tier II capital.
“Tier III capital” consists of qualifying unsecured debt. The sum of Tier II and Tier III capital may not
exceed the amount of Tier I capital.
Under the capital guidelines, there are three fundamental capital ratios: a total risk-based capital ratio, a
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio, and a Tier 1 leverage ratio. To be deemed “well capitalized” a bank must have a
total risk-based capital ratio of at least ten percent, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least at six percent, and a
Tier 1 leverage ratio of at least five percent. There is currently no Tier 1 leverage requirement for a holding
company to be deemed well-capitalized. At December 31, 2010, the respective capital ratios of the Bancorp and
the Bank exceeded the minimum percentage requirements to be deemed “well-capitalized”. As of December 31,
2010, the Bank’s total risk-based capital ratio was 16.71% and its Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio was 14.81%. As
of December 31, 2010, the Bancorp’s total risk-based capital ratio was 17.27% and its Tier 1 risk-based capital
ratio was 15.37%. The federal banking agencies may change existing capital guidelines or adopt new capital
guidelines in the future and have required many banks and bank holding companies subject to enforcement
actions to maintain capital ratios in excess of the minimum ratios otherwise required to be deemed well
capitalized, in which case institutions may no longer be deemed well capitalized and may therefore be subject to
restrictions on taking brokered deposits.
The Bancorp and the Bank are also required to maintain a leverage capital ratio designed to supplement the
risk-based capital guidelines. Banks and bank holding companies that have received the highest rating of the five
categories used by regulators to rate banks and that are not anticipating or experiencing any significant growth
must maintain a ratio of Tier 1 capital (net of all intangibles) to adjusted total assets of at least 3%. All other
institutions are required to maintain a leverage ratio of at least 100 to 200 basis points above the 3% minimum,
for a minimum of 4% to 5%. Pursuant to federal regulations, banks must maintain capital levels commensurate
with the level of risk to which they are exposed, including the volume and severity of problem loans. Federal
regulators may, however, set higher capital requirements when a bank’s particular circumstances warrant. As of
December 31, 2010, the Bank’s leverage capital ratio was 11.03%, and the Bancorp’s leverage capital ratio was
11.44%, both ratios exceeding regulatory minimums.
Basel Accords
The current risk-based capital guidelines which apply to the Company and the Bank are based upon the
1988 capital accord (referred to as “Basel I”) of the Basel Committee. The Basel Committee develops broad
policy guidelines for use by each country’s supervisors in determining the supervisory policies they apply. A new
framework and accord, referred to as Basel II evolved from 2004 to 2006 out of the efforts to revise capital
adequacy standards for internationally active banks. Basel II emphasizes internal assessment of credit, market
and operational risk, and supervisory assessment and market discipline in determining minimum capital
requirements and became mandatory for large or “core” international banks outside the United States in 2008
(total assets of $250 billion or more or consolidated foreign exposures of $10 billion or more). Basel II was
18
optional for others, and if adopted, must first be complied with in a “parallel run” for two years along with the
existing Basel I standards.
The United States federal banking agencies issued a proposed rule for banking organizations that do not use
the “advanced approaches” under Basel II. While this proposed rule generally parallels the relevant approaches
under Basel II, it diverges where United States markets have unique characteristics and risk profiles. A definitive
final rule has not yet been issued. The United States banking agencies indicated, however, that they would retain
the minimum leverage requirement for all United States banks.
In January 2009, the Basel Committee proposed to reconsider regulatory capital standards, supervisory and
risk-management requirements and additional disclosures to further strengthen the Basel II framework in
response to the worldwide economic downturn. In December 2009, the Basel Committee released two
consultative documents proposing significant changes to bank capital, leverage and liquidity requirements to
enhance the Basel II framework which had not yet been fully implemented internationally and even less so in the
United States. The G-20 endorsed the reform package, referred to as Basel III, and proposed phase in timelines in
November 2010. Basel III provides for increases in the minimum Tier 1 common equity ratio and the minimum
requirement for the Tier 1 capital ratio. Basel III additionally includes a “capital conservation buffer” on top of
the minimum requirement designed to absorb losses in periods of financial and economic distress; and an
additional required countercyclical buffer percentage to be implemented according to a particular nation’s
circumstances. These capital requirements are further supplemented under Basel III by a non-risk-based leverage
ratio. Basel III also reaffirms the Basel Committee’s intention to introduce higher capital requirements on
securitization and trading activities at the end of 2011.
The Basel III liquidity proposals have three main elements: (i) a “liquidity coverage ratio” designed to meet
the bank’s liquidity needs over a 30-day time horizon under an acute liquidity stress scenario, (ii) a “net stable
funding ratio” designed to promote more medium and long-term funding over a one-year time horizon, and (iii) a
set of monitoring tools that the Basel Committee indicates should be considered as the minimum types of
information that banks should report to supervisors.
Implementation of Basel III in the United States will require regulations and guidelines by United States
banking regulators, which may differ in significant ways from the recommendations published by the Basel
Committee. It is unclear how United States banking regulators will define “well-capitalized” in their
implementation of Basel III and to what extent and when smaller banking organizations in the United States will
be subject to these regulations and guidelines. Basel III standards, if adopted, would lead to significantly higher
capital requirements, higher capital charges and more restrictive leverage and liquidity ratios. The standards
would:
•
•
•
•
•
impose more restrictive eligibility requirements for Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital;
increase the minimum Tier 1 common equity ratio to 4.5%, net of regulatory deductions, and introduce a
capital conservation buffer of an additional 2.5% of common equity to risk-weighted assets, raising the
target minimum common equity ratio to 7%;
increase the minimum Tier 1 capital ratio to 8.5% inclusive of the capital conservation buffer;
increase the minimum total capital ratio to 10.5% inclusive of the capital conservation buffer; and
introduce a countercyclical capital buffer of up to 2.5% of common equity or other fully loss absorbing
capital for periods of excess credit growth.
Basel III also introduces a non-risk adjusted Tier 1 leverage ratio of 3%, based on a measure of total exposure
rather than total assets, and new liquidity standards. The new Basel III capital standards will be phased in from
January 1, 2013 until January 1, 2019.
19
United States banking regulators must also implement Basel III in conjunction with the provisions of the
Dodd-Frank Act related to increased capital and liquidity requirements. Further, the Dodd-Frank Act requires
minimum leverage and risk-based capital requirements on a consolidated basis for all depository institution
holding companies and insured depository institutions that cannot be less than the strictest requirements in effect
for depository institutions as of the date of enactment, July 21, 2010.
Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
The FDI Act provides a framework for regulation of depository institutions and their affiliates, including
parent holding companies, by their federal banking regulators. It requires the relevant federal banking regulator
to take “prompt corrective action” with respect to a depository institution if that institution does not meet certain
capital adequacy standards, including requiring the prompt submission of an acceptable capital restoration plan.
Supervisory actions by the appropriate federal banking regulator under the prompt corrective action rules
generally depend upon an institution’s classification within five capital categories as defined in the regulations.
The relevant capital measures are the capital ratio, the Tier 1 capital ratio, and the leverage ratio. However, the
federal banking agencies have also adopted non-capital safety and soundness standards to assist examiners in
identifying and addressing potential safety and soundness concerns before capital becomes impaired. These
include operational and managerial standards relating to: (i) internal controls, information systems, and internal
audit systems, (ii) loan documentation, (iii) credit underwriting, (iv) asset quality and growth, (v) earnings,
(vi) risk management, and (vii) compensation and benefits.
A depository institution’s capital Tier under the prompt corrective action regulations will depend upon how
its capital levels compare with various relevant capital measures and the other factors established by the
regulations. A bank will be: (i) “well capitalized” if the institution has a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0% or
greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% or greater, and a leverage ratio of 5.0% or greater and is not
subject to any order or written directive by any such regulatory authority to meet and maintain a specific capital
level for any capital measure; (ii) “adequately capitalized” if the institution has a total risk-based capital ratio of
8.0% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 4.0% or greater, and a leverage ratio of 4.0% or greater and is
not “well capitalized”; (iii) “undercapitalized” if the institution has a total risk-based capital ratio that is less than
8.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 4.0%, or a leverage ratio of less than 4.0%; (iv) “significantly
undercapitalized” if the institution has a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 6.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital
ratio of less than 3.0%, or a leverage ratio of less than 3.0%; and (v) “critically undercapitalized” if the
institution’s tangible equity is equal to or less than 2.0% of average quarterly tangible assets. An institution may
be downgraded to, or deemed to be in, a capital category that is lower than indicated by its capital ratios if it is
determined to be in an unsafe or unsound condition or if it receives an unsatisfactory examination rating with
respect to certain matters.
The FDI Act generally prohibits a depository institution from making any capital distributions (including
payment of a dividend) or paying any management fee to its parent holding company if the depository institution
would thereafter be “undercapitalized.” “Undercapitalized” institutions are subject to growth limitations and are
required to submit a capital restoration plan. The regulatory agencies may not accept such a plan without
determining that the plan is based on realistic assumptions and is likely to succeed in restoring the depository
institution’s capital. In addition, for a capital restoration plan to be acceptable, the depository institution’s parent
holding company must guarantee that the institution will comply with such capital restoration plan. The bank
holding company must also provide appropriate assurances of performance. The aggregate liability of the parent
holding company is limited to the lesser of (i) an amount equal to 5.0% of the depository institution’s total assets
at the time it became undercapitalized and (ii) the amount which is necessary (or would have been necessary) to
bring the institution into compliance with all capital standards applicable with respect to such institution as of the
time it fails to comply with the plan. If a depository institution fails to submit an acceptable plan, it is treated as if
it is “significantly undercapitalized.” “Significantly undercapitalized” depository institutions may be subject to a
number of requirements and restrictions, including orders to sell sufficient voting stock to become “adequately
20
capitalized,” requirements to reduce total assets, and cessation of receipt of deposits from correspondent banks.
“Critically undercapitalized” institutions are subject to the appointment of a receiver or conservator.
The appropriate federal banking agency may, under certain circumstances, reclassify a well capitalized
insured depository institution as adequately capitalized. The FDI Act provides that an institution may be
reclassified if the appropriate federal banking agency determines (after notice and opportunity for a hearing) that
the institution is in an unsafe or unsound condition or deems the institution to be engaging in an unsafe or
unsound practice. The appropriate agency is also permitted to require an adequately capitalized or
undercapitalized institution to comply with the supervisory provisions as if the institution were in the next lower
category (but not treat a significantly undercapitalized institution as critically undercapitalized) based on
supervisory information other than the capital levels of the institution.
Dividends
Holders of the Bancorp’s common stock and preferred stock are entitled to receive dividends as and when
declared by the board of directors out of funds legally available therefore under the laws of the State of
Delaware. Delaware corporations such as the Bancorp may make distributions to their stockholders out of their
surplus, or in case there is no surplus, out of their net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend is declared
and/or the preceding fiscal year. However, dividends may not be paid out of a corporation’s net profits if, after
the payment of the dividend, the corporation’s capital would be less than the capital represented by the issued
and outstanding stock of all classes having a preference upon the distribution of assets.
Our recently adopted capital management and dividend policy as part of our Three-Year Capital and
Strategic Plan includes a policy to refrain from paying dividends in excess of $.01 per share per quarter, except
when covered by operating earnings beginning in 2011. The amount of future dividends will depend on earnings,
financial condition, capital requirements and other factors, and will be determined by our board of directors in
accordance with the capital management and dividend policy.
It is the Federal Reserve’s policy that bank holding companies should generally pay dividends on common
stock only out of income available over the past year, and only if prospective earnings retention is consistent with
the organization’s expected future needs and financial condition. It is also the Federal Reserve’s policy that bank
holding companies should not maintain dividend levels that undermine their ability to be a source of strength to
its banking subsidiaries. Additionally, in consideration of the current financial and economic environment, the
Federal Reserve has indicated that bank holding companies should carefully review their dividend policy and has
discouraged payment ratios that are at maximum allowable levels unless both asset quality and capital are very
strong.
The Bancorp is further currently restricted as to the payment of dividends by the memorandum of
understanding with the FRB SF. As a result of losses incurred in the second, third and fourth quarters of 2009, we
were expected to inform and consult with the Federal Reserve supervisory staff prior to declaring or paying any
dividends and we have agreed under the memorandum of understanding with the FRB SF that we will not,
without the FRB SF’s prior written approval, declare or pay any dividends, make any payments on trust preferred
securities, or make any other capital distributions. On February 10, 2011, Bancorp received Federal Reserve
approval to make payments on our Series B Preferred Stock and Junior Subordinated Securities. There can be no
assurance that our regulators will approve such payments or dividends in the future.
The Bank is a legal entity that is separate and distinct from its holding company. The Bancorp receives
income through dividends paid by the Bank. Subject to the regulatory restrictions which currently further restrict
the ability of the Bank to declare and pay dividends, future cash dividends by the Bank will depend upon
management’s assessment of future capital requirements, contractual restrictions, and other factors.
21
The powers of the board of directors of the Bank to declare a cash dividend to the Bancorp is subject to
California law, which restricts the amount available for cash dividends to the lesser of a bank’s retained earnings
or net income for its last three fiscal years (less any distributions to shareholders made during such period).
Where the above test is not met, cash dividends may still be paid, with the prior approval of the DFI in an amount
not exceeding the greatest of (1) retained earnings of the bank; (2) the net income of the bank for its last fiscal
year; or (3) the net income of the bank for its current fiscal year.
The Bancorp is currently a participant under the TARP CPP. Under the terms of the TARP CPP, for so long
as any preferred stock issued under the TARP CPP remains outstanding, the Bancorp is prohibited from
increasing dividends on its common stock, and from making certain repurchases of equity securities, including its
common stock, without the Treasury’s consent until the third anniversary of the Treasury’s investment or until
the Treasury has transferred all of the preferred stock it purchased under the TARP CPP to third parties. As long
as the preferred stock issued to the Treasury is outstanding, dividend payments and repurchases or redemptions
relating to certain equity securities, including the Bancorp’s common stock, are also prohibited until all accrued
and unpaid dividends are paid on such preferred stock, subject to certain limited exceptions. See “Capital
Resources” and “Liquidity” in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations” in Part II— Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The terms of our Series B Preferred Stock and Junior Subordinated Securities also limit our ability to pay
dividends on our common stock. If we are not current in our payment of dividends on our Series B Preferred
Stock or in our payment of interest on our Junior Subordinated Securities, we may not pay dividends on our
common stock. See “Risk Factors—The terms of our outstanding preferred stock limit our ability to pay
dividends on and repurchase our common stock and there can be no assurance of any future dividends on our
common stock generally” and “Risk Factors—Our outstanding debt securities restrict our ability to pay dividends
on our capital stock” in Part 1—Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The Bank is subject to a restriction on dividends it may pay to the Bancorp under its memorandum of
understanding with the DFI and the FDIC. Under the memorandum of understanding the Bancorp entered into
with the FRB SF, we agreed that we will not, without the FRB SF’s prior written approval, receive any dividends
or any other form of payment or distribution representing a reduction of capital from the Bank. In our Three-Year
Capital and Strategic Plan, we indicate the Bank will not pay a dividend to us in 2010.
Operations and Consumer Compliance Laws
The Bank must comply with numerous federal anti-money laundering and consumer protection statutes and
implementing regulations, including the USA Patriot Act of 2001, the Bank Secrecy Act, the CRA, the Fair
Credit Reporting Act, as amended by the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, the Equal Credit
Opportunity Act, the Truth in Lending Act, the Fair Housing Act, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, the Real
Estate Settlement Procedures Act, the National Flood Insurance Act and various federal and state privacy
protection laws. The Bank and the Company are also subject to federal and state laws prohibiting unfair or
fraudulent business practices, untrue or misleading advertising and unfair competition.
These laws and regulations also mandate certain disclosure requirements and regulate the manner in which
financial institutions must deal with customers when taking deposits, making loans, collecting loans, and
providing other services. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations can subject the Bank to lawsuits and
penalties, including but not limited to enforcement actions, injunctions, fines or criminal penalties, punitive
damages to consumers, and the loss of certain contractual rights.
The Dodd-Frank Act provides for the creation of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection as an
independent entity within the Federal Reserve. This Bureau is a new regulatory agency for United States banks. It
will have broad rulemaking, supervisory, and enforcement authority over consumer financial products and
services, including deposit products, residential mortgages, home-equity loans and credit cards, and the Dodd-
Frank Act contains provisions on mortgage-related matters such as steering incentives, determinations as to a
22
borrower’s ability to repay and prepayment penalties. The Bureau’s functions include investigating consumer
complaints, conducting market research, rulemaking, supervising and examining banks consumer transactions,
and enforcing rules related to consumer financial products and services. It is anticipated that the Bureau will
begin regulating activities in 2011 for banks, such as the Bank, with over $10 billions in assets. Banks with less
than $10 billion in assets will continue to be examined for compliance by their primary federal banking agency.
Federal Home Loan Bank System
The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of San Francisco. Among other benefits,
each FHLB serves as a reserve or central bank for its members within its assigned region. Each FHLB is financed
primarily from the sale of consolidated obligations of the FHLB system. Each FHLB makes available loans or
advances to its members in compliance with the policies and procedures established by the Board of Directors of
the individual FHLB. Each member of the FHLB of San Francisco is required to own stock in an amount equal to
the greater of (i) a membership stock requirement with an initial cap of $25 million (100% of “membership asset
value” as defined), or (ii) an activity based stock requirement (based on percentage of outstanding advances).
There can be no assurance that the FHLB will pay dividends at the same rate it has paid in the past, or that it will
pay any dividends in the future.
Impact of Monetary Policies
The earnings and growth of the Bank are largely dependent on its ability to maintain a favorable differential
or spread between the yield on its interest-earning assets and the rates paid on its deposits and other interest-
bearing liabilities. As a result, the Bank’s performance is influenced by general economic conditions, both
domestic and foreign, the monetary and fiscal policies of the federal government, and the policies of the
regulatory agencies. The Federal Reserve implements national monetary policies (such as seeking to curb
inflation and combat recession) by its open-market operations in U.S. Government securities, by adjusting the
required level of reserves for financial institutions subject to its reserve requirements and by varying the discount
rate applicable to borrowings by banks from the Federal Reserve Banks. The actions of the Federal Reserve in
these areas influence the growth of bank loans, investments, and deposits and also affect interest rates charged on
loans and deposits. The nature and impact of any future changes in monetary policies cannot be predicted.
Environmental Regulation
In the course of the Bank’s business, the Bank may foreclose and take title to real estate, and could be
subject to environmental liabilities with respect to these properties. The Bank may be held liable to a
governmental entity or to third parties for property damage, personal injury, investigation and clean-up costs
incurred by these parties in connection with environmental contamination, or may be required to investigate or
clear up hazardous or toxic substances, or chemical releases at a property. The costs associated with investigation
or remediation activities could be substantial. In addition, as the owner or former owner of any contaminated site,
the Bank may be subject to common law claims by third parties based on damages, and costs resulting from
environmental contamination emanating from the property. If the Bank ever becomes subject to significant
environmental liabilities, its business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations could be materially
and adversely affected.
Audit Requirements
The Bank is required to have an annual independent audit, alone or as a part of its bank holding company’s
audit, and to prepare all financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
The Bank and the Bancorp are also each required to have an audit committee comprised entirely of independent
directors. As required by NASDAQ, the Bancorp has certified that its audit committee has adopted formal
written charters and meets the requisite number of directors, independence, and qualification standards. As such,
among other requirements, the Bancorp must maintain an audit committee that includes members with banking
23
or related financial management expertise, has access to its own outside counsel, and does not include members
who are large customers of the Bank. In addition, because the Bank has more than $3 billion in total assets, it is
subject to the FDIC requirements for audit committees of large institutions.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act also addresses accounting oversight and corporate governance matters.
Management and the Bancorp’s independent registered public accounting firm are required to assess the
effectiveness of the Bancorp’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010. These
assessments are included in “Controls and Procedures” in Part II—Item 9A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Regulation of Non-bank Subsidiaries
Non-bank subsidiaries are subject to additional or separate regulation and supervision by other state, federal
and self-regulatory bodies. Additionally, any foreign-based subsidiaries would also be subject to foreign laws and
regulations.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Difficult business and economic conditions have adversely affected our industry.
Our financial performance generally, and the ability of borrowers to pay interest on and repay the principal
of outstanding loans and the value of the collateral securing those loans, is highly dependent upon the business
and economic conditions in the markets in which we operate and in the United States as a whole. In December
2007, the United States entered into a recession. Business activity across a wide range of industries and regions
has been greatly reduced and unemployment has increased significantly. Dramatic declines in the real estate
market, with decreasing prices and increasing delinquencies and foreclosures, have negatively impacted
performance of commercial and consumer credit, resulting in additional write-downs. Concerns over the stability
of the financial markets and the economy have resulted in decreased lending by financial institutions to their
customers and to each other. Although the economy has showed some signs of improvement, certain sectors,
such as real estate, remain weak, and unemployment remains high in general and in the markets in which we
operate. Local governments and many businesses are still experiencing serious difficulties due to the lack of
consumer spending and liquidity in the credit markets. These economic pressures on consumers and businesses
may continue to adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and stock price. In
particular, we may face the following risks in connection with these events:
• We potentially face increased regulation of our industry, including changes by Congress or federal
regulatory agencies to the banking and financial institutions regulatory regime and heightened legal
standards and regulatory requirements or expectations imposed in connection with the Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, or the Dodd-Frank Act, the Emergency Economic
Stabilization Act of 2008, or the EESA, and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2008, or
the ARRA, or other legislation that may be adopted in the future. Compliance with such regulation may
increase our costs and limit our ability to pursue business opportunities.
•
The process we use to estimate losses inherent in our credit exposure requires difficult, subjective, and
complex judgments, including forecasts of economic conditions and how these economic conditions
might impair the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans. The level of uncertainty concerning
economic conditions may adversely affect the accuracy of our estimates which may, in turn, impact the
reliability of the process.
• Our banking operations are concentrated primarily in California, and secondarily in New York, Texas,
Massachusetts, Washington, Illinois, New Jersey, and Hong Kong. Adverse economic conditions in
these regions in particular could impair borrowers’ ability to service their loans, decrease the level and
duration of deposits by customers, and erode the value of loan collateral. These conditions include the
effects of the current general decline in real estate sales and prices in many markets across the United
States, the economic recession of recent years, and higher rates of unemployment. These conditions
24
could increase the amount of our non-performing assets and have an adverse effect on our efforts to
collect our non-performing loans or otherwise liquidate our non-performing assets (including other real
estate owned) on terms favorable to us, if at all, and could also cause a decline in demand for our
products and services, or a lack of growth or a decrease in deposits, any of which may cause us to incur
losses, adversely affect our capital, and hurt our business.
We are subject to a memorandum of understanding with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, or the
FRB SF, and the Bank is subject to a memorandum of understanding with the California DFI and the FDIC
and we may be subject to further supervisory action by bank supervisory authorities that could have a material
negative effect on our business, financial condition, and the value of our common stock.
Under federal and state laws and regulations pertaining to the safety and soundness of insured depository
institutions, the DFI and the Federal Reserve Board, and separately the FDIC as insurer of the Bank’s deposits,
have authority to compel or restrict certain actions if the Bank’s capital should fall below adequate capital
standards as a result of operating losses, or if its regulators otherwise determine that it has insufficient capital or
has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices. Among other matters, the corrective actions may include, but are not
limited to, requiring us and/or the Bank to enter into informal or formal enforcement orders, including
memoranda of understanding, written agreements, supervisory letters, commitment letters, and consent or cease
and desist orders to take corrective action and refrain from unsafe and unsound practices; removing officers and
directors and assessing civil monetary penalties; and taking possession of and closing and liquidating the Bank.
As a result of losses incurred in recent periods, we entered into a memorandum of understanding with the FRB
SF in December 2009. Under the memorandum, we agreed to submit to the FRB SF for review and approval a
plan to maintain sufficient capital at the Company on a consolidated basis and at the Bank, a dividend policy for
the Bancorp, a plan to improve management of our liquidity position and funds management practices, and a
liquidity policy and contingency funding plan for the Bancorp. As part of our compliance with the memorandum,
on January 22, 2010, we submitted a Three-Year Capital and Strategic Plan to the FRB SF which updated a
previously submitted plan. In addition, we have agreed that we will not, without the FRB SF’s prior written
approval, (i) receive any dividends or any other form of payment or distribution representing a reduction of
capital from the Bank, or (ii) declare or pay any dividends, make any payments on trust preferred securities, or
make any other capital distributions. We further agreed to notify the FRB SF prior to effecting certain changes to
our senior executive officers and board of directors and we are limited and/or prohibited, in certain
circumstances, in our ability to enter into contracts to pay and to make golden parachute severance and
indemnification payments.
On March 1, 2010, the Bank entered into the memorandum of understanding with the DFI and the FDIC.
Under that memorandum, we are required, among other things, to develop and implement plans to reduce
commercial real estate concentrations, to improve our capital ratios, and to reduce the Bank’s overall risk profile;
to develop and implement a plan to improve asset quality; and to develop and implement a plan to reduce
dependence on wholesale funding. We may need to take significant action to comply with these requirements,
including selling assets during adverse market conditions, raising additional capital, and limiting or ceasing the
offering of profitable products and services, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and our
financial condition. In addition, we are required to retain management and directors acceptable to the DFI and the
FDIC. No assurance can be given that our current management and directors are acceptable to the DFI or the
FDIC, that we will be able to retain or engage management and directors who are acceptable to the DFI or the
FDIC or that we will be able to meet the requirements of the memorandum in a timely manner.
If we are unable to meet the requirements of the memorandum with the FRB SF or the DFI and the FDIC in
a timely manner, we could become subject to additional supervisory action, including a cease and desist order. If
our banking supervisors were to take such additional supervisory action, we could, among other things, become
subject to significant restrictions on our ability to develop any new business, as well as restrictions on our
existing business, and we could be required to raise additional capital, dispose of certain assets and liabilities
within a prescribed period of time, or both. The terms of any such supervisory action could have a material
25
negative effect on our business, our financial condition, and the value of our common stock. Additionally, there
can be no assurance that we will not be subject to further supervisory action or regulatory proceedings that could
have a material negative impact on our business.
U.S. and international financial markets and economic conditions could adversely affect our liquidity, results
of operations, and financial condition.
The cost and availability of funds may be adversely affected by illiquid credit markets and the demand for
our products and services may decline as our borrowers and customers realize the impact of an economic
slowdown and recession. In view of the concentration of our operations and the collateral securing our loan
portfolio in Northern and Southern California, we may be particularly susceptible to the adverse economic
conditions in the State of California. In addition, the severity and duration of these adverse conditions are
unknown and may exacerbate our exposure to credit risk and adversely affect the ability of borrowers to perform
under the terms of their lending arrangements with us.
We may be required to make additional provisions for loan losses and charge off additional loans in the
future, which could adversely affect our results of operations.
At December 31, 2010, our allowance for loan losses totaled $245.2 million and we had net charge-offs of
approximately $126.4 million for the fiscal year ended on that date. Since 2008 there has been a significant
slowdown in the real estate market in portions of Los Angeles, San Diego, Riverside, and San Bernardino
counties and the Central Valley of California where many of our commercial real estate and construction loan
customers are based. This slowdown reflects declining prices and excess inventories of homes to be sold, which
has contributed to financial strain on home builders and suppliers. In addition, the Federal Reserve and other
government officials have expressed concerns about the commercial real estate lending concentrations of
financial institutions and the ability of commercial real estate borrowers to perform pursuant to the terms of their
loans. As of December 31, 2010, we had approximately $4.4 billion in commercial real estate and construction
loans. Continuing deterioration in the real estate market generally and in the commercial real estate and
residential building segments in particular could result in additional loan charge offs and provisions for loan
losses in the future, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, net income, and
capital.
The allowance for credit losses is an estimate of probable credit losses. Actual credit losses in excess of the
estimate could adversely affect our results of operations and capital.
A significant source of risk arises from the possibility that we could sustain losses because borrowers,
guarantors, and related parties may fail to perform in accordance with the terms of their loans and leases. The
underwriting and credit monitoring policies and procedures that we have adopted to address this risk may not
prevent unexpected losses that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results
of operations, and cash flows. The allowance for credit losses is based on management’s estimate of the probable
losses from our credit portfolio. If actual losses exceed the estimate, the excess losses could adversely affect our
results of operations and capital. Such excess losses could also lead to larger allowances for credit losses in
future periods, which could in turn adversely affect results of operations and capital in those periods. If economic
conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used in the estimate or adverse developments arise with
respect to our credits, future losses may occur, and increases in the allowance may be necessary. In addition,
various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the adequacy of
our allowance. These agencies may require us to establish additional allowances based on their judgment of the
information available at the time of their examinations. No assurance can be given that we will not sustain credit
losses in excess of present or future levels of the allowance for credit losses.
26
Additional requirements imposed by the Dodd-Frank Act could adversely affect us.
Recent government efforts to strengthen the U.S. financial system have resulted in the imposition of
additional regulatory requirements, including expansive financial services regulatory reform legislation. The
Dodd-Frank Act, adopted in July 2010, sets out sweeping regulatory changes. Changes imposed by the Dodd-
Frank Act include: (i) new requirements on banking, derivative and investment activities, including modified
capital requirements, the repeal of the prohibition on the payment of interest on business demand accounts, and
debit card interchange fee requirements; (ii) corporate governance and executive compensation requirements;
(iii) enhanced financial institution safety and soundness regulations, including increases in assessment fees and
deposit insurance coverage; and (iv) the establishment of new regulatory bodies, such as the Bureau of Consumer
Financial Protection. While certain provisions became effective immediately, much of the Dodd-Frank Act is
subject to further rulemaking and/or study. Accordingly, we cannot fully assess its impact on our operations and
costs until these final regulations are adopted and implemented, which could be within six to 24 months from
enactment or later, depending on the regulation.
Current and future legal and regulatory requirements, restrictions, and regulations, including those imposed
under the Dodd-Frank Act, may adversely impact our profitability and may have a material and adverse effect on
our business, financial condition, and results of operations, may require us to invest significant management
attention and resources to evaluate and make any changes required by the legislation and related regulations and
may make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified executive officers and employees.
We are subject to extensive laws and regulations and supervision, and may become subject to future laws and
regulations and supervision, if any, that may be enacted, that could limit or restrict our activities, may hamper
our ability to increase our assets and earnings, and could adversely affect our profitability.
We operate in a highly regulated industry and are or may become subject to regulation by federal, state, and
local governmental authorities and various laws, regulations, regulatory guidelines, and judicial and
administrative decisions imposing requirements or restrictions on part or all of our operations, capitalization,
payment of dividends, mergers and acquisitions, investments, loans and interest rates charged, interest rates paid
on deposits, and locations of offices. We also must comply with numerous federal anti-money laundering and
consumer protection statutes and regulations. A considerable amount of management time and resources have
been devoted to the oversight of, and the development and implementation of controls and procedures relating to,
compliance with these laws and regulations, and we expect that significant time and resources will be devoted to
compliance in the future. These laws and regulations mandate certain disclosure and reporting requirements and
regulate the manner in which we must deal with our customers when taking deposits, making loans, collecting
loans, and providing other services. We also are or may become subject to examination, supervision, and
additional comprehensive regulation by various federal, state, and local authorities with regard to compliance
with these laws and regulations.
Because our business is highly regulated, the laws, rules, regulations, and supervisory guidance and policies
applicable to us are subject to regular modification and change. Perennially, various laws, rules and regulations
are proposed, which, if adopted, could impact our operations or could substantially and adversely affect our
ability to operate profitably by making compliance much more difficult or expensive, restricting our ability to
originate or sell loans or further restricting the amount of interest or other charges or fees earned on loans or
other products. It is impossible to predict the competitive impact that any such changes would have on the
banking and financial services industry in general or on our business in particular. Such changes may, among
other things, increase the cost of doing business, limit permissible activities, or affect the competitive balance
between banks and other financial institutions. The Dodd-Frank Act, enacted in July 2010, instituted major
changes to the banking and financial institutions regulatory regimes in light of the recent performance of and
government intervention in the financial services sector. Other changes to statutes, regulations, or regulatory
policies, including changes in interpretation or implementation of statutes, regulations, or policies, could affect us
in substantial and unpredictable ways. Such changes could subject us to additional costs, limit the types of
27
financial services and products we may offer, and/or increase the ability of non-banks to offer competing
financial services and products, among other things. Failure to comply with laws, regulations, or policies could
result in sanctions by regulatory agencies, civil money penalties, and/or reputation damage, which could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. See “Regulation and
Supervision” in Part I – Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The FDIC’s restoration plan and the related increased assessment rate could adversely affect our earnings.
As a result of a series of financial institution failures and other market developments, the deposit insurance
fund, or DIF, of the FDIC has been significantly depleted with a reduction in the ratio of reserves to insured
deposits. As a result of recent economic conditions and the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act, the FDIC has
increased the deposit insurance assessment rates and thus raised deposit premiums for insured depository
institutions. If these increases are insufficient for the DIF to meet its funding requirements, further special
assessments or increases in deposit insurance premiums may be required. We are generally unable to control the
amount of premiums that we are required to pay. If there are additional bank or financial institution failures, we
may be required to pay even higher FDIC premiums than the recently increased levels. Any future additional
assessments, increases or required prepayments in FDIC insurance premiums may materially and adversely affect
our results of operations.
We may experience goodwill impairment.
If our estimates of goodwill fair value change due to changes in our businesses or other factors, we may
determine that impairment charges are necessary. Estimates of fair value are determined based on a complex
model using cash flows and company comparisons. If management’s estimates of future cash flows are
inaccurate, the fair value determined could be inaccurate and impairment may not be recognized in a timely
manner.
Liquidity risk could impair our ability to fund operations and jeopardize our financial condition.
Liquidity is essential to our business. An inability to raise funds through deposits, borrowings, the sale of
loans, and other sources could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity. Our access to funding sources in
amounts adequate to finance our activities could be impaired by factors that affect us specifically or the financial
services industry in general. Factors that could detrimentally impact our access to liquidity sources include a
decrease in the level of our business activity due to a market downturn or adverse regulatory action against us.
Our ability to acquire deposits or borrow could also be impaired by factors that are not specific to us, such as a
severe disruption of the financial markets or negative views and expectations about the prospects for the financial
services industry as a whole as the recent turmoil faced by banking organizations in the domestic and worldwide
credit markets deteriorates.
Our business is subject to interest rate risk and fluctuations in interest rates could reduce our net interest
income and adversely affect our business.
A substantial portion of our income is derived from the differential, or “spread,” between the interest earned
on loans, investment securities and other interest-earning assets, and the interest paid on deposits, borrowings and
other interest-bearing liabilities. The interest rate risk inherent in our lending, investing, and deposit taking
activities is a significant market risk to us and our business. Income associated with interest earning assets and
costs associated with interest-bearing liabilities may not be affected uniformly by fluctuations in interest rates.
The magnitude and duration of changes in interest rates, events over which we have no control, may have an
adverse effect on net interest income. Prepayment and early withdrawal levels, which are also impacted by
changes in interest rates, can significantly affect our assets and liabilities. Increases in interest rates may
adversely affect the ability of our floating rate borrowers to meet their higher payment obligations, which could
in turn lead to an increase in non-performing assets and net charge-offs.
28
Generally, the interest rates on our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities do not change at the
same rate, to the same extent, or on the same basis. Even assets and liabilities with similar maturities or periods
of re-pricing may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. Interest rates on certain types of
assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in general market interest rates, while interest rates on
other types of assets and liabilities may lag behind changes in general market rates. Certain assets, such as fixed
and adjustable rate mortgage loans, have features that limit changes in interest rates on a short-term basis and
over the life of the asset.
We seek to minimize the adverse effects of changes in interest rates by structuring our asset-liability
composition to obtain the maximum spread. We use interest rate sensitivity analysis and a simulation model to
assist us in estimating the optimal asset-liability composition. However, such management tools have inherent
limitations that impair their effectiveness. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in minimizing the
adverse effects of changes in interest rates.
We have engaged in expansion through acquisitions and may consider additional acquisitions in the future,
which could negatively affect our business and earnings.
We have engaged in expansion through acquisitions and may consider acquisitions in the future. There are
risks associated with any such expansion. These risks include, among others, incorrectly assessing the asset
quality of a bank acquired in a particular transaction, encountering greater than anticipated costs in integrating
acquired businesses, facing resistance from customers or employees, and being unable to profitably deploy assets
acquired in the transaction. Additional country- and region-specific risks are associated with transactions outside
the United States, including in China. To the extent we issue capital stock in connection with additional
transactions, if any, these transactions and related stock issuances may have a dilutive effect on earnings per
share and share ownership.
Our earnings, financial condition, and prospects after a merger or acquisition depend in part on our ability to
successfully integrate the operations of the acquired company. We may be unable to integrate operations
successfully or to achieve expected cost savings. Any cost savings which are realized may be offset by losses in
revenues or other charges to earnings.
In addition, our ability to grow may be limited if we cannot make acquisitions. We compete with other
financial institutions with respect to proposed acquisitions. We cannot predict if or when we will be able to
identify and attract acquisition candidates or make acquisitions on favorable terms.
We may in the future engage in FDIC-assisted transactions, which could present additional risks to our
business.
In the current economic environment, and subject to any requisite regulatory consent, we may potentially be
presented with opportunities to acquire the assets and liabilities of failed banks in FDIC-assisted transactions.
These acquisitions involve risks similar to acquiring existing banks even though the FDIC might provide
assistance to mitigate certain risks such as sharing in exposure to loan losses and providing indemnification
against certain liabilities of the failed institution. However, because these acquisitions are structured in a manner
that would not allow us the time normally associated with preparing for and evaluating an acquisition, including
preparing for integration of an acquired institution, we may face additional risks if we engage in FDIC-assisted
transactions. These risks include the loss of customers, strain on management resources related to collection and
management of problem loans and problems related to integration of personnel and operating systems. If we
engage in FDIC-assisted transactions, we may not be successful in overcoming these risks or any other problems
encountered in connection with these transactions. Our inability to overcome these risks could have an adverse
effect on our ability to achieve our business strategy and maintain our market value and profitability.
29
Moreover, even if we were inclined to participate in an FDIC-assisted transaction, there are no assurances
that the FDIC would allow us to participate or what the terms of such transaction might be or whether we would
be successful in acquiring the bank or assets that we are seeking. We may be required to raise additional capital
as a condition to, or as a result of, participation in an FDIC-assisted transaction. Any such transactions and
related issuances of stock may have a dilutive effect on earnings per share and share ownership.
Furthermore, to the extent we are allowed to, and choose to, participate in FDIC-assisted transactions, we
may face competition from other financial institutions with respect to the proposed FDIC-assisted transactions.
To the extent that our competitors are selected to participate in FDIC-assisted transactions, our ability to identify
and attract acquisition candidates and/or make acquisitions on favorable terms may be adversely affected.
Inflation and deflation may adversely affect our financial performance.
The Consolidated Financial Statements and related financial data presented in this report have been prepared
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. These principles require the
measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars, without considering
changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation or deflation. The primary impact of
inflation on our operations is reflected in increased operating costs. Conversely, deflation will tend to erode
collateral values and diminish loan quality. Virtually all of our assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. As a
result, interest rates have a more significant impact on our performance than the general levels of inflation or
deflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or in the same magnitude as the price of
goods and services.
As we expand our business outside of California markets, we will encounter risks that could adversely affect us.
We primarily operate in California markets with a concentration of Chinese-American individuals and
businesses; however, one of our strategies is to expand beyond California into other domestic markets that have
concentrations of Chinese-American individuals and businesses. We currently have operations in six other states
(New York, Texas, Washington, Massachusetts, Illinois, and New Jersey) and in Hong Kong. In the course of
this expansion, we will encounter significant risks and uncertainties that could have a material adverse effect on
our operations. These risks and uncertainties include increased expenses and operational difficulties arising from,
among other things, our ability to attract sufficient business in new markets, to manage operations in
noncontiguous market areas, to comply with all of the various local laws and regulations, and to anticipate events
or differences in markets in which we have no current experience.
To the extent that we expand through acquisitions, such acquisitions may also adversely harm our business
if we fail to adequately address the financial and operational risks associated with such acquisitions. For
example, risks can include difficulties in assimilating the operations, technology, and personnel of the acquired
company; diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns; inability to maintain uniform
standards, controls, procedures, and policies; potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities; the incurring of
additional debt and contingent liabilities; use of cash resources; large write-offs; and amortization expenses
related to other intangible assets with finite lives.
Our loan portfolio is largely secured by real estate, which has adversely affected and may continue to
adversely affect our results of operations.
A downturn in our real estate markets has hurt our business because many of our loans are secured by real
estate. The real estate collateral securing our borrowers’ obligations is principally located in California, and to a
lesser extent, in New York, Texas, Massachusetts, Washington, Illinois, and New Jersey. The value of such
collateral depends upon conditions in the relevant real estate markets. These include general or local economic
conditions and neighborhood characteristics, unemployment rates, real estate tax rates, the cost of operating the
30
properties, governmental regulations and fiscal policies, acts of nature including earthquakes, floods, and
hurricanes (which may result in uninsured losses), and other factors beyond our control. The current general
decline in real estate sales and prices in many markets across the United States could reduce the value of our
collateral such that we may not be able to realize an amount upon a foreclosure sale equal to the indebtedness
secured by the property. Continued declines in real estate sales and prices coupled with any weakness in the
economy and continued high unemployment will result in higher than expected loan delinquencies or problem
assets, a decline in demand for our products and services, or a lack of growth or a decrease in deposits, which
may cause us to incur losses, adversely affect our capital, and hurt our business.
The risks inherent in construction lending may continue to affect adversely our results of operations. Such
risks include, among other things, the possibility that contractors may fail to complete, or complete on a timely
basis, construction of the relevant properties; substantial cost overruns in excess of original estimates and
financing; market deterioration during construction; and lack of permanent take-out financing. Loans secured by
such properties also involve additional risk because such properties have no operating history. In these loans,
loan funds are advanced upon the security of the project under construction (which is of uncertain value prior to
completion of construction) and the estimated operating cash flow to be generated by the completed project.
There is no assurance that such properties will be sold or leased so as to generate the cash flow anticipated by the
borrower. The current general decline in real estate sales and prices across the United States, the decline in
demand for residential real estate, economic weakness, high rates of unemployment, and reduced availability of
mortgage credit, are all factors that can adversely affect the borrowers’ ability to repay their obligations to us and
the value of our security interest in collateral, and thereby adversely affect our results of operations and financial
results.
Our use of appraisals in deciding whether to make a loan on or secured by real property does not ensure the
value of the real property collateral.
In considering whether to make a loan secured by real property, we require an appraisal of the property.
However, an appraisal is only an estimate of the value of the property at the time the appraisal is made. If the
appraisal does not reflect the amount that may be obtained upon any sale or foreclosure of the property, we may
not realize an amount equal to the indebtedness secured by the property.
Our interest expense may increase following the repeal of the federal prohibition on payment of interest on
demand deposits.
The federal prohibition on the ability of financial institutions to pay interest on demand deposit accounts
was repealed as part of the Dodd-Frank Act. As a result, beginning on July 21, 2011, financial institutions can
commence offering interest on demand deposits to compete for clients. We do not yet know what interest rates
other institutions may offer. Our interest expense will increase and our net interest margin will decrease if the
Bank begins offering interest on demand deposits to attract additional customers or to maintain current
customers, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
We face substantial competition from larger competitors.
We face substantial competition for deposits, loans, and for other banking services, as well as acquisitions,
throughout our market area from the major banks and financial institutions that dominate the commercial
banking industry. This may cause our cost of funds to exceed that of our competitors. These banks and financial
institutions have greater resources than we do, including the ability to finance advertising campaigns and allocate
their investment assets to regions of higher yield and demand and make acquisitions. By virtue of their larger
capital bases, they have substantially greater lending limits than we do and perform certain functions, including
trust services, which are not presently offered by us. We also compete for loans and deposits, as well as other
banking services, with savings and loan associations, brokerage houses, insurance companies, mortgage
companies, credit unions, credit card companies and other financial and non-financial institutions and entities.
31
The recent consolidation of certain competing financial institutions and the conversion of certain investment
banks to bank holding companies has increased the level of competition among financial services companies and
may adversely affect our ability to market our products and services.
The impact of the new Basel III capital standards will likely impose enhanced capital adequacy standards on us.
On September 12, 2010, the Group of Governors and Heads of Supervision, the oversight body of the Basel
Committee, announced agreement on the calibration and phase-in arrangements for a strengthened set of capital
requirements, known as Basel III, which were approved in November 2010 by the G20 leadership. Basel III
increases the minimum Tier 1 common equity ratio to 4.5%, net of regulatory deductions, and introduces a
capital conservation buffer of an additional 2.5% of common equity to risk-weighted assets, raising the target
minimum common equity ratio to 7%. Basel III increases the minimum Tier 1 capital ratio to 8.5% inclusive of
the capital conservation buffer, increases the minimum total capital ratio to 10.5% inclusive of the capital buffer,
and introduces a countercyclical capital buffer of up to 2.5% of common equity or other fully loss absorbing
capital for periods of excess credit growth. Basel III also introduces a non-risk adjusted Tier 1 leverage ratio of
3%, based on a measure of total exposure rather than total assets, and new liquidity standards. The Basel III
capital and liquidity standards will be phased in over a multi-year period. The Federal Reserve will likely
implement changes to the capital adequacy standards applicable to us and the Bank which will increase our
capital requirements and compliance costs.
We are dependent on key personnel and the loss of one or more of those key personnel may materially and
adversely affect our prospects.
Competition for qualified employees and personnel in the banking industry is intense and there are a limited
number of qualified persons with knowledge of, and experience in, the communities that we serve. The process
of recruiting personnel with the combination of skills and attributes required to carry out our strategies is often
lengthy. Our success depends to a significant degree upon our ability to attract and retain qualified management,
loan origination, finance, administrative, marketing and technical personnel and upon the continued contributions
of our management and personnel. In particular, our success has been and continues to be highly dependent upon
the abilities of key executives and certain other employees.
On March 1, 2010, the Bank entered into a memorandum of understanding with the DFI and the FDIC
pursuant to which we are required to retain management and directors acceptable to the DFI and the FDIC. No
assurance can be given that our current management or directors are acceptable to the DFI or the FDIC or that we
will be able to retain or engage management or directors who are acceptable to the DFI and the FDIC. If we are
unable to retain such management and directors, we may be subject to further supervisory action that could have
a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and the value of our common stock.
Managing reputational risk is important to attracting and maintaining customers, investors, and employees.
Threats to our reputation can come from many sources, including adverse sentiment about financial
institutions generally, unethical practices, employee misconduct, failure to deliver minimum standards of service
or quality, compliance deficiencies, and questionable, illegal, or fraudulent activities of our customers. We have
policies and procedures in place that seek to protect our reputation and promote ethical conduct, but these
policies and procedures may not be fully effective. Negative publicity regarding our business, employees, or
customers, with or without merit, may result in the loss of customers, investors, and employees, costly litigation,
a decline in revenues and increased governmental regulation.
Natural disasters and geopolitical events beyond our control could adversely affect us.
Natural disasters such as earthquakes, wildfires, extreme weather conditions, hurricanes, floods, and other
acts of nature and geopolitical events involving civil unrest, changes in government regimes, terrorism, or
32
military conflict could adversely affect our business operations and those of our customers and cause substantial
damage and loss to real and personal property. These natural disasters and geopolitical events could impair our
borrowers’ ability to service their loans, decrease the level and duration of deposits by customers, erode the value
of loan collateral, and result in an increase in the amount of our non-performing loans and a higher level of
non-performing assets (including real estate owned), net charge-offs, and provision for loan losses, which could
adversely affect our earnings.
Adverse conditions in Asia could adversely affect our business.
A substantial number of our customers have economic and cultural ties to Asia and, as a result, we are likely
to feel the effects of adverse economic and political conditions in Asia, including the effects of rising inflation in
China and other regions. In addition, in 2007, we opened a branch in Hong Kong. U.S. and global economic
policies, military tensions, and unfavorable global economic conditions may adversely impact the Asian
economies. Pandemics and other public health crises or concerns over the possibility of such crises could create
economic and financial disruptions in the region. If economic conditions in Asia deteriorate, we could, among
other things, be exposed to economic and transfer risk, and could experience an outflow of deposits by those of
our customers with connections to Asia. Transfer risk may result when an entity is unable to obtain the foreign
exchange needed to meet its obligations or to provide liquidity. This may adversely impact the recoverability of
investments with or loans made to such entities. Adverse economic conditions in Asia, and in China or Taiwan in
particular, may also negatively impact asset values and the profitability and liquidity of our customers who
operate in this region.
Because of our participation in the TARP Capital Purchase Program, we are subject to several restrictions
including restrictions on compensation paid to our executives.
Pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement between us and the U.S. Treasury, or the Purchase
Agreement, under which we sold $258 million of our Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series B,
with a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, or the Series B Preferred Stock, we adopted certain standards
for executive compensation and corporate governance. These standards generally apply to our Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and the three next most highly compensated executive officers. The standards
include (i) ensuring that incentive compensation for senior executive officers does not encourage unnecessary
and excessive risks that threaten the value of the financial institution; (ii) requiring clawback of any bonus or
incentive compensation paid to a senior executive officer based on statements of earnings, gains, or other criteria
that are later proven to be materially inaccurate; (iii) a prohibition on making golden parachute payments to
senior executives; and (iv) agreement not to deduct for tax purposes executive compensation in excess of
$500,000 for each senior executive. In particular, the change to the deductibility limit on executive compensation
will likely increase the overall cost of our compensation programs in future periods.
The adoption of the ARRA on February 17, 2009, and interim final regulations thereunder effective June 15,
2009, have imposed certain new executive compensation and corporate expenditure limits on all current and
future TARP recipients, including the Company, until the institution has repaid the U.S. Treasury, which is now
permitted under the ARRA without penalty and without the need to raise new capital, subject to the U.S.
Treasury’s consultation with the recipient’s appropriate regulatory agency. The ARRA executive compensation
standards are in many respects more stringent than those that continue in effect under the TARP CPP and those
previously proposed by the U.S. Treasury. The new standards include (but are not limited to) (i) prohibitions on
bonuses, retention awards and other incentive compensation, other than restricted stock or restricted stock unit
grants for up to one-third of an employee’s total annual compensation, which grants cannot vest for a period of at
least two years and can be liquidated during the TARP period only in proportion to the repayment of the TARP
investment at 25% increments, (ii) prohibitions on golden parachute payments for departure from a company or
change in control of the company, (iii) an expanded clawback of bonuses, retention awards, and incentive
compensation if payment is based on materially inaccurate statements of earnings, revenues, gains or other
33
criteria, (iv) prohibitions on compensation plans that encourage manipulation of reported earnings, (v) retroactive
review of bonuses, retention awards, and other compensation previously provided by TARP recipients if found
by the U.S. Treasury to be inconsistent with the purposes of TARP or otherwise contrary to the public interest,
(vi) required establishment of a company-wide policy regarding “excessive or luxury expenditures,” and
(vii) inclusion in a participant’s proxy statements for annual shareholder meetings of a nonbinding “Say on Pay”
shareholder vote on the compensation of executives.
Our information systems may experience an interruption or breach in security.
We rely heavily on communications and information systems to conduct our business. Any failure,
interruption, or breach in security of these systems could result in failures or disruptions in our customer
relationship management, general ledger, deposit, loan and other systems. While we have policies and procedures
designed to prevent or limit the effect of the failure, interruption, or security breach of our information systems,
there can be no assurance that any such failures, interruptions, or security breaches will not occur or, if they do
occur, that they will be adequately addressed. The occurrence of any failures, interruptions, or security breaches
of our information systems could damage our reputation, result in a loss of customer business, subject us to
additional regulatory scrutiny, or expose us to civil litigation and possible financial liability, any of which could
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Our need to continue to adapt our information technology systems to allow us to provide new and expanded
services could present operational issues and require significant capital spending.
As we continue to offer Internet banking and other on-line and mobile services to our customers, and
continue to expand our existing conventional banking services, we will need to adapt our information technology
systems to handle these changes in a way that meets constantly changing industry and regulatory standards. This
can be very expensive and may require significant capital expenditures. In addition, our success will depend,
among other things, on our ability to provide secure and reliable services, anticipate changes in technology, and
efficiently develop and introduce services that are accepted by our customers and cost effective for us to provide.
Systems failures, delays, breaches of confidentiality, and other problems could harm our reputation and business.
Certain provisions of our charter and bylaws could make the acquisition of our company more difficult.
Certain provisions of our restated certificate of incorporation, as amended, and our restated bylaws, as
amended, could make the acquisition of our company more difficult. These provisions include authorized but
unissued shares of preferred and common stock that may be issued without stockholder approval; three classes of
directors serving staggered terms; special requirements for stockholder proposals and nominations for director;
and super-majority voting requirements in certain situations including certain types of business combinations.
Our financial results could be adversely affected by changes in accounting standards or tax laws and
regulations.
From time to time, the Financial Accounting Standards Board and the SEC will change the financial
accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of our financial statements. In addition, from time
to time, federal and state taxing authorities will change the tax laws and regulations, and their interpretations.
These changes and their effects can be difficult to predict and can materially and adversely impact how we record
and report our financial condition and results of operations.
The price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly, and this may make it difficult for you to sell shares
of common stock owned by you at times or at prices you find attractive.
The trading price of our common stock may fluctuate widely as a result of a number of factors, many of which
are outside our control. In addition, the stock market is subject to fluctuations in the share prices and trading
34
volumes that affect the market prices of the shares of many companies. These broad market fluctuations could
adversely affect the market price of our common stock. Among the factors that could affect our stock price are:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
actual or anticipated quarterly fluctuations in our operating results and financial condition;
changes in revenue or earnings estimates or publication of research reports and recommendations by
financial analysts;
failure to meet analysts’ revenue or earnings estimates;
speculation in the press or investment community;
strategic actions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions or restructurings;
acquisitions of other banks or financial institutions, through FDIC-assisted transactions or otherwise;
actions by institutional stockholders;
fluctuations in the stock price and operating results of our competitors;
general market conditions and, in particular, developments related to market conditions for the financial
services industry;
fluctuations in the stock price and operating results of our competitors;
proposed or adopted regulatory changes or developments;
anticipated or pending investigations, proceedings, or litigation that involve or affect us;
successful management of reputational risk; and
domestic and international economic factors unrelated to our performance.
The stock market and, in particular, the market for financial institution stocks, has experienced significant
volatility. As a result, the market price of our common stock may be volatile. In addition, the trading volume in
our common stock may fluctuate more than usual and cause significant price variations to occur. The trading
price of the shares of our common stock and the value of our other securities will depend on many factors, which
may change from time to time, including, without limitation, our financial condition, performance,
creditworthiness and prospects, future sales of our equity or equity related securities, and other factors identified
above in “Forward-Looking Statements,” and in this Item 1A – Risk Factors. The capital and credit markets can
experience volatility and disruption. Such volatility and disruption can reach unprecedented levels, resulting in
downward pressure on stock prices and credit availability for certain issuers without regard to those issuers’
underlying financial strength. A significant decline in our stock price could result in substantial losses for
individual stockholders and could lead to costly and disruptive securities litigation.
Statutory restrictions and restrictions by our regulators on dividends and other distributions from the Bank
may adversely impact us by limiting the amount of distributions the Bancorp may receive. State laws and our
regulators may restrict our ability to pay dividends.
A substantial portion of Bancorp’s cash flow comes from dividends that the Bank pays to us. Various
statutory provisions restrict the amount of dividends that the Bank can pay without regulatory approval. Also, the
Bank is subject to a restriction on dividends it may pay to Bancorp under a memorandum of understanding with
the DFI and the FDIC. Under the memorandum of understanding we entered into with the FRB SF, we agreed
that we will not, without the FRB SF’s prior written approval, receive any dividends or any other form of
payment or distribution representing a reduction of capital from the Bank. In our Three-Year Capital and
Strategic Plan we submitted to the FRB SF, we indicated the Bank will not pay a dividend to us in 2010. In
addition, we adopted a capital management and dividend policy as part of the Capital Plan in which we adopted a
policy to refrain from paying dividends in excess of $.01 per share per quarter, except when covered by operating
earnings beginning in 2011.
35
The Federal Reserve Board has previously issued Federal Reserve Supervision and Regulation Letter
SR-09-4 that states that bank holding companies are expected to inform and consult with Federal Reserve
supervisory staff prior to declaring and paying a dividend that exceeds earnings for the period for which the
dividend is being paid. As a result of losses incurred in recent periods, we were expected to so inform and consult
with the Federal Reserve supervisory staff prior to declaring or paying any dividends and we have agreed under
the memorandum of understanding with the FRB SF that we will not, without the FRB SF’s prior written
approval, declare or pay any dividends, make any payments on trust preferred securities, or make any other
capital distributions. There can be no assurance that our regulators will approve the payment of such dividends.
In addition, if the Bank were to liquidate, the Bank’s creditors would be entitled to receive distributions
from the assets of the Bank to satisfy their claims against the Bank before Bancorp, as a holder of the equity
interest in the Bank, would be entitled to receive any of the assets of the Bank.
The ability of the Bank to pay dividends to us is limited by various regulations and statutes, including
California law, and our ability to pay dividends on our outstanding stock is limited by various regulations and
statutes, including Delaware law.
The terms of our outstanding preferred stock limit our ability to pay dividends on and repurchase our common
stock and there can be no assurance of any future dividends on our common stock generally.
In connection with the Purchase Agreement between us and the U.S. Treasury, we issued a warrant to
purchase up to 1,846,374 shares of our common stock, or the Warrant, which provides that prior to the earlier of
(i) December 5, 2011, and (ii) the date on which all of the shares of the Series B Preferred Stock have been
redeemed by us or transferred by the U.S. Treasury to third parties, we may not, without the consent of the U.S.
Treasury, (i) increase the cash dividend on our common stock above $.105 per share, the amount of the last
quarterly cash dividend per share declared prior to October 14, 2008, or (ii) subject to limited exceptions,
redeem, repurchase or otherwise acquire shares of our common stock or preferred stock other than the Series B
Preferred Stock. In addition, we are unable to pay any dividends on our common stock unless we are current in
our dividend payments on the Series B Preferred Stock.
The Federal Reserve Board has previously issued Federal Reserve Supervision and Regulation Letter
SR-09-4 that states that bank holding companies are expected to inform and consult with Federal Reserve
supervisory staff prior to declaring and paying a dividend that exceeds earnings for the period for which the
dividend is being paid. As a result of losses incurred in recent periods, we were expected to so inform and consult
with the Federal Reserve supervisory staff prior to declaring or paying any dividends and we have agreed under
the memorandum of understanding with the FRB SF that we will not, without the FRB SF’s prior written
approval, (i) receive any dividends or any other form of payment or distribution representing a reduction of
capital from the Bank, or (ii) declare or pay any dividends, make any payments on trust preferred securities, or
make any other capital distributions. The Bancorp and the Bank are also each subject to additional statutory and
regulatory restrictions on paying dividends.
The restrictions described above, together with the potentially dilutive impact of the Warrant, described
below, could have a negative effect on the value of our common stock. Moreover, holders of our common stock
are entitled to receive dividends only when, as and if declared by our Board of Directors. Although we have
historically paid cash dividends on our common stock, we are not required to do so and our Board of Directors
could reduce or eliminate our common stock dividend in the future. Commencing with the second quarter of
2009, our Board reduced our common stock dividend to $.08 per share, and commencing with the third quarter of
2009, our Board further reduced our dividend to $.01 per share. There can be no assurance that we will be able to
pay dividends in the future.
36
Our outstanding preferred stock impacts net income available to our common stockholders and earnings per
common share, and the Warrant as well as other potential issuances of equity securities may be dilutive to
holders of our common stock.
The dividends declared and the accretion on discount on our outstanding preferred stock will reduce the net
income available to common stockholders and our earnings per common share. Our outstanding preferred stock
will also receive preferential treatment in the event of our liquidation, dissolution, or winding up. Additionally,
the ownership interest of the existing holders of our common stock will be diluted to the extent the Warrant is
exercised. The 1,846,374 shares of common stock underlying the Warrant represent approximately 2.3% of the
shares of our common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2010 (including the shares issuable upon exercise of
the Warrant in total shares outstanding). Although the U.S. Treasury has agreed not to vote any of the shares of
common stock it receives upon exercise of the Warrant, a transferee of any portion of the Warrant or of any
shares of common stock acquired upon exercise of the Warrant is not bound by this restriction. In addition, to the
extent options to purchase common stock under our stock option plans are exercised, holders of our common
stock will incur additional dilution.
We are not restricted from issuing additional common stock or preferred stock, including any securities that
are convertible into or exchangeable for, or that represent the right to receive, common stock or preferred stock
or any substantially similar securities. If we sell additional equity or convertible debt securities, these sales could
result in increased dilution to our stockholders. See “We may need to raise additional capital which may dilute
the interests of holders of our common stock or otherwise have an adverse effect on their investment” below.
The issuance of additional shares of preferred stock could adversely affect holders of common stock, which
may negatively impact their investment.
Our board of directors is authorized to issue additional classes or series of preferred stock without any
action on the part of the stockholders. The board of directors also has the power, without stockholder approval, to
set the terms of any such classes or series of preferred stock that may be issued, including voting rights, dividend
rights and preferences over the common stock with respect to dividends or upon the liquidation, dissolution, or
winding up of our business and other terms. If we issue preferred stock in the future that has a preference over
the common stock with respect to the payment of dividends or upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up, or if
we issue preferred stock with voting rights that dilute the voting power of the common stock, the rights of
holders of the common stock or the market price of the common stock could be adversely affected.
Our outstanding debt securities restrict our ability to pay dividends on our capital stock.
In June 2003, Cathay Capital Trust I issued $20,619,000 of Floating Rate Trust Preferred Securities. In
September 2003, Cathay Statutory Trust I issued $20,619,000 of Floating Rate Trust Preferred Securities. In
December 2003, Cathay Capital Trust II issued $12,887,000 of Floating Rate Trust Preferred Securities. In
March 2007, Cathay Capital Trust III issued $46,392,000 of Floating Rate Trust Preferred Securities. In May
2007, Cathay Capital Trust IV issued $20,619,000 of Floating Rate Trust Preferred Securities. These securities
are collectively referred to herein as the “Trust Preferred Securities.” Payments to investors in respect of the
Trust Preferred Securities are funded by distributions on certain series of securities issued by us, with similar
terms to the relevant series of Trust Preferred Securities, which we refer to as the “Junior Subordinated Notes.”
In addition, in September 2006, the Bank issued $50,000,000 in subordinated debt in a private placement, which
we refer to as the “Bank Subordinated Debt.” If we are unable to pay interest in respect of the Junior
Subordinated Notes (which will be used to make distributions on the Trust Preferred Securities), or if any other
event of default occurs, then we will generally be prohibited from declaring or paying any dividends or other
distributions, or redeeming, purchasing or acquiring, any of our capital securities, including the common stock,
during the next succeeding interest payment period applicable to any of the Junior Subordinated Notes.
If the Bank is unable to pay interest in respect of the Bank Subordinated Debt, or if any other event of
default has occurred and is continuing on the Bank Subordinated Debt, then the Bank will be prohibited from
37
declaring or paying dividends or other distributions, or redeeming, purchasing or acquiring, any of its capital
stock, during the next succeeding interest payment applicable to the Bank Subordinated Debt. As a result, the
Bank will be prohibited from making dividend payments to us, which, in turn could affect our ability to pay
dividends on our capital securities, including the common stock.
Moreover, any other financing agreements that we enter into in the future may limit our ability to pay cash
dividends on our capital stock, including the common stock. In the event that any other financing agreements in
the future restrict our ability to pay dividends in cash on the common stock, we may be unable to pay dividends
in cash on the common stock unless we can refinance amounts outstanding under those agreements.
We may need to raise additional capital which may dilute the interests of holders of our common stock or
otherwise have an adverse effect on their investment.
If economic conditions deteriorate, particularly in the California commercial real estate and residential real
estate markets where our business is concentrated, we may need to raise more capital to support any additional
provisions for loan losses and loan charge-offs. In addition, we may need to raise more capital to meet other
regulatory requirements, if our losses are higher than expected and we believe that we may breach the target
capital ratios in our Three-Year Capital and Strategic Plan, or to participate in FDIC-assisted transactions. There
can be no assurances that we would succeed in raising any such additional capital, and any capital we obtain may
dilute the interests of holders of our common stock, or otherwise have an adverse effect on their investment.
The soundness of other financial institutions could adversely affect us.
Financial services institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty or other
relationships. We have exposure to many different industries and counterparties, and we routinely execute
transactions with counterparties in the financial industry, including brokers and dealers, commercial banks,
investment banks, and other institutions. Many of these transactions expose us to credit risk in the event of
default of our counterparty. In addition, our credit risk may be exacerbated when the collateral held by us cannot
be realized upon or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount of the financial instrument
exposure due us. Any such losses could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of
operations.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
The Company has not received written comments regarding its periodic or current reports from the staff of
the Securities and Exchange Commission that were issued not less than 180 days before the end of its 2010 fiscal
year and that remain unresolved.
Item 2. Properties.
Cathay General Bancorp
The Bancorp currently neither owns nor leases any real or personal property. The Bancorp uses the
premises, equipment, and furniture of the Bank at 777 North Broadway, Los Angeles, California 90012 and at
9650 Flair Drive, El Monte, California 91731 in exchange for payment of a management fee to the Bank.
Cathay Bank
The Bank’s head office is located in a 36,727 square foot building in the Chinatown area of Los Angeles.
The Bank owns both the building and the land upon which the building is situated. In January 2009, the Bank
moved certain of its administrative offices to a seven-story 102,548 square foot office building located at 9650
Flair Drive, El Monte, California 91731. The Bank also owns this building and land in El Monte.
38
The Bank owns its branch offices in Monterey Park, Alhambra, Westminster, San Gabriel, City of Industry,
Cupertino, Artesia, New York City, Flushing (2 locations), and Chicago. In addition, the Bank has certain
operating and administrative departments located at 4128 Temple City Boulevard, Rosemead, California, where
it owns the building and land with approximately 27,600 square feet of space.
The Bank leases certain other premises. Expiration dates of the Bank’s leases range from March 2011 to
October 2017. Our Hong Kong branch is located at 28 Queen’s Road Central Hong Kong. The lease for the 3,436
square foot office commenced on December 16, 2006 and will expire in December 2012. Our representative
office in Shanghai is located at Room 2610-A, 1515 Nanjing Road West, Kerry Centre, Shanghai, China, and
consists of 869 square feet. The lease was renewed for three years from May 2009 to May 2012. The
representative office in Taipei is located at Sixth Floor, Suite 3, 146 Sung Chiang Road, Taipei, Taiwan, and
consists of 1,806 square feet. The lease was renewed for one year from July 2010 to June 2011.
As of December 31, 2010, the Bank’s investment in premises and equipment totaled $109.5 million. See
Note 8 and Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
The Company and its subsidiaries and their property are not currently a party or subject to any material
pending legal proceeding.
Item 4. Removed and Reserved.
Executive Officers of the Registrant.
The table below sets forth the names, ages, and positions at the Bancorp and the Bank of all executive
officers of the Company as of February 15, 2011.
Name
Age
Present Position and Principal Occupation During the Past Five Years
Dunson K. Cheng . . . . . . . . . . .
66 Chairman of the Board of Directors of Bancorp and the Bank since
1994; Director, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Bancorp since
1990. President of the Bank since 1985 and Director of the Bank since
1982.
Peter Wu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
62 Director, Executive Vice Chairman, and Chief Operating Officer of
Bancorp and the Bank since October 20, 2003.
Anthony M. Tang . . . . . . . . . . .
57 Director of Bancorp since 1990; Executive Vice President of Bancorp
since 1994; Chief Lending Officer of the Bank since 1985; Director of
the Bank since 1986; Senior Executive Vice President of the Bank since
December 1998.
Heng W. Chen . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
58 Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer of
Bancorp since June 2003; Executive Vice President of the Bank since
June 2003; Chief Financial Officer of the Bank since January 2004.
Irwin Wong . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
62 Executive Vice President-Branch Administration of the Bank from 1999
to February 2011; Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer of
the Bank since February 2011.
Kim R. Bingham . . . . . . . . . . . .
54 Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer of the Bank since
August 2004.
Perry P. Oei . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
48
Senior Vice President of Bancorp and the Bank since January 2004;
General Counsel of Bancorp and the Bank since July 2001; Secretary of
Bancorp and the Bank since August 2010.
39
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities.
Market Information
Our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “CATY.” Prior to
July 3, 2006, our common stock traded on the NASDAQ National Market. The closing price of our common
stock on February 15, 2011, was $18.64 per share, as reported by the NASDAQ Global Select Market.
The following table sets forth the high and low closing prices as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select
Market for the periods presented:
Year Ended December 31,
2010
2009
High
Low
High
Low
First quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Second quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Third quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fourth quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$11.85
14.70
12.46
16.96
$ 8.20
10.16
9.39
11.84
$23.32
16.00
11.46
10.06
$7.50
9.15
8.09
7.27
Holders
As of February 15, 2011, there were approximately 1,727 holders of record of our common stock.
Dividends
The cash dividends per share declared by quarter were as follows:
First quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Second quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Third quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fourth quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Year Ended December 31,
2010
$0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
$0.040
2009
$0.105
0.080
0.010
0.010
$0.205
Performance Graph
The graph and accompanying information furnished below compares the percentage change in the
cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock from December 31, 2005, through December 31, 2010,
with the percentage change in the cumulative total return on the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (the “S&P 500
Index”) and the SNL Western Bank Index for the same period. The SNL Western Bank Index is a market-
weighted index including every publicly traded bank and bank holding company located in Alaska, California,
Hawaii, Montana, Oregon, and Washington. We will furnish, without charge, on the written request of any
person who is a stockholder of record as of the record date for the 2011 annual meeting of the stockholders, a list
of the companies included in the SNL Western Bank Index. Requests for this information should be addressed to
Perry Oei, Secretary, Cathay General Bancorp, 777 North Broadway, Los Angeles, California 90012. This graph
assumes the investment of $100 in our common stock on December 31, 2005, and an investment of $100 in each
of the S&P 500 Index and the SNL Western Bank Index on that date.
40
NOTE: The comparisons in the graph below are based upon historical data and are not indicative of, nor
intended to forecast, the future performance or returns of our common stock. Such information furnished
herewith shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any of our filings under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be deemed to be “soliciting
material” or to be “filed” under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act with the Securities and
Exchange Commission except to the extent that the Company specifically requests that such information be
treated as soliciting material or specifically incorporates it by reference into a filing under the Securities Act or
the Securities Exchange Act.
Total Return Performance
e
u
l
a
V
x
e
d
n
I
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Cathay General Bancorp
SNL Western Bank
S & P 500
12/31/05
12/31/06
12/31/07
12/31/08
12/31/09
12/31/10
Index
12/31/05
12/31/06
12/31/07
12/31/08
12/31/09
12/31/10
Cathay General Bancorp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SNL Western Bank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
S&P 500 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
100.00
100.00
100.00
96.97
112.83
115.79
75.35
94.25
122.16
69.34
91.76
76.96
22.38
84.27
97.33
49.68
95.48
111.99
Period Ending
Source: SNL Financial LC, Charlottesville, VA © 2011
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
There were no sales of any equity securities by the Company during the period covered by this Annual
Report on Form 10-K that were not registered under the Securities Act.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
As of December 31, 2010, Bancorp may repurchase up to 622,500 shares of common stock under the
November 2007 stock repurchase program, subject to limitations included in the EESA. No shares were
repurchased in the three years from 2008 to 2010.
41
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
The following table presents our selected historical consolidated financial data, and is derived in part from
our audited consolidated financial statements. The selected historical consolidated financial data should be read
in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto, which are included in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K as well as in Part I-Item 7 — “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.”
Selected Consolidated Financial Data
Income Statement (1)
Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net interest income before provision for credit losses . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for credit losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net interest income/(loss) after provision for credit losses . . . . . . . .
Securities gains/(losses) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other non-interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Loss)/income before income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax (benefit)/expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income/(loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
. . . . . . . . . .
Net income/(loss) attributable to Cathay General Bancorp . . . . . . . .
Dividends on preferred stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Year Ended December 31,
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
$
489,594
191,688
297,906
156,900
141,006
18,695
13,556
175,711
(2,454)
(14,629)
12,175
(610)
11,565
(16,388)
$
528,731
246,039
282,692
307,000
(24,308)
55,644
23,010
183,037
(128,691)
(61,912)
(66,779)
(611)
(67,390)
(16,338)
$
589,951
294,804
295,147
106,700
188,447
(5,971)
24,878
136,676
70,678
19,554
51,124
(603)
50,521
(1,140)
$
615,271
305,750
309,521
11,000
298,521
810
26,677
128,745
197,263
71,191
126,072
491,518
212,235
279,283
2,000
277,283
201
21,263
113,315
185,432
67,259
118,173
(603)
(603)
125,469
117,570
—
—
Net (loss)/income attributable to common stockholders . . . . . . . . . . $
(4,823) $
(83,728) $
49,381
$
125,469
$
117,570
Net (loss)/income attributable to common stockholders per common
share
Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Cash dividends paid per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Weighted-average common shares
(0.06) $
(0.06) $
$
0.040
(1.59) $
(1.59) $
$
0.205
1.00
1.00
0.420
$
$
$
2.49
2.46
0.405
$
$
$
2.29
2.27
0.360
Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
77,073,954
77,073,954
52,629,159
52,629,159
49,414,824
49,529,793
50,418,303
50,975,449
51,234,596
51,804,495
Statement of Condition
Investment securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,843,669
6,615,769
Net loans (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2,873
10,801,986
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6,991,846
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to
repurchase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Borrowings from other financial institutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,561,000
550,000
27,576
171,136
1,436,105
$ 3,550,114
6,678,914
54,826
11,588,232
7,505,040
$ 3,083,817
7,340,181
$ 2,347,665
6,608,079
$ 1,522,223
5,675,342
—
—
11,582,639
6,836,736
10,402,532
6,278,367
—
8,030,977
5,675,306
1,557,000
929,362
26,532
171,136
1,312,744
1,662,000
1,449,362
19,500
171,136
1,301,387
1,432,025
1,375,180
8,301
171,136
980,419
450,000
714,680
10,000
104,125
951,574
Common Stock Data
Shares of common stock outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Book value per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Profitability Ratios
Return on average assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Return on average stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividend payout ratio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average equity to average assets ratio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Efficiency ratio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
78,531,783
14.80
63,459,590
16.49
$
49,508,250
20.90
$
49,336,187
19.70
$
51,930,955
18.16
$
0.10%
0.81
27.16
12.45
53.22
-0.58%
(5.20)
n/m
11.29
50.65
0.47%
4.91
42.02
9.58
43.52
1.38%
13.28
16.36
10.37
38.20
1.60%
13.61
15.67
11.76
37.68
*
(1)
n/m, not meaningful
Includes the operating results and the acquired assets and assumed deposits and liabilities of (i) Great Eastern Bank after April 6,
2006, (ii) New Asia Bancorp and its subsidiaries after October 17, 2006, and (iii) United Heritage Bank after March 30, 2007.
(2) Net loans represent gross loans net of loan participations sold, allowance for loan losses, and unamortized deferred loan fees.
42
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
General
The following discussion is intended to provide information to facilitate the understanding and assessment
of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Bancorp and its subsidiaries. It should be
read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes appearing elsewhere in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The Bank offers a wide range of financial services. It currently operates 20 branches in Southern California,
11 branches in Northern California, eight branches in New York State, one branch in Massachusetts, two
branches in Texas, three branches in Washington State, three branches in Illinois, one branch in New Jersey, one
branch in Hong Kong and two representative offices (one in Shanghai, China, and one in Taipei, Taiwan). The
Bank is a commercial bank, servicing primarily individuals, professionals, and small to medium-sized businesses
in the local markets in which its branches are located.
The financial information presented herein includes the accounts of the Bancorp, its subsidiaries, including
the Bank, and the Bank’s consolidated subsidiaries. All material transactions between these entities are
eliminated.
Critical Accounting Policies
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our
consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires
management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues
and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our consolidated financial
statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Certain accounting policies involve significant judgments and assumptions by management which have a
material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities; management considers such accounting
policies to be critical accounting policies. The judgments and assumptions used by management are based on
historical experience and other factors, which are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.
Management believes the following are critical accounting policies that require the most significant
judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements:
Allowance for Credit Losses
The determination of the amount of the provision for credit losses charged to operations reflects
management’s current judgment about the credit quality of the loan portfolio and takes into consideration
changes in lending policies and procedures, changes in economic and business conditions, changes in the nature
and volume of the portfolio and in the terms of loans, changes in the experience, ability and depth of lending
management, changes in the volume and severity of past due, non-accrual, and adversely classified or graded
loans, changes in the quality of the loan review system, changes in the value of underlying collateral for
collateral-dependent loans, the existence and effect of any concentrations of credit and the effect of competition,
legal and regulatory requirements, and other external factors. The nature of the process by which we determine
the appropriate allowance for loan losses requires the exercise of considerable judgment. The allowance is
increased by the provision for loan losses and decreased by charge-offs when management believes the
uncollectibility of a loan is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. A weakening
of the economy or other factors that adversely affect asset quality could result in an increase in the number of
delinquencies, bankruptcies, or defaults, and a higher level of non-performing assets, net charge-offs, and
provision for loan losses in future periods.
43
The total allowance for credit losses consists of two components: specific allowances and general
allowances. To determine the adequacy of the allowance in each of these two components, we employ two
primary methodologies, the individual loan review analysis methodology and the classification migration
methodology. These methodologies support the basis for determining allocations between the various loan
categories and the overall adequacy of our allowance to provide for probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio.
These methodologies are further supported by additional analysis of relevant factors such as the historical losses
in the portfolio, and environmental factors which include trends in delinquency and non-accrual, and other
significant factors, such as the national and local economy, the volume and composition of the portfolio, strength
of management and loan staff, underwriting standards, and the concentration of credit.
The Bank’s management allocates a specific allowance for “Impaired Credits,” in accordance with
Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) Section 310-10-35. For non-Impaired Credits, a general allowance is
established for those loans internally classified and risk graded Pass, Minimally Acceptable, Special Mention, or
Substandard based on historical losses in the specific loan portfolio and a reserve based on environmental factors
determined for that loan group. The level of the general allowance is established to provide coverage for
management’s estimate of the credit risk in the loan portfolio by various loan segments not covered by the
specific allowance. The allowance for credit losses is discussed in more detail in “Risk Elements of the Loan
Portfolio– Allowance for Credit Losses” below.
Investment Securities
The classification and accounting for investment securities are discussed in detail in Note 1 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements presented elsewhere herein. Under ASC Topic 320, formerly SFAS No. 115,
Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, investment securities must be classified as
held-to-maturity, available-for-sale, or trading. The appropriate classification is based partially on our ability to
hold the securities to maturity and largely on management’s intentions with respect to either holding or selling
the securities. The classification of investment securities is significant since it directly impacts the accounting for
unrealized gains and losses on securities. Unrealized gains and losses on trading securities flow directly through
earnings during the periods in which they arise, whereas available-for-sale securities are recorded as a separate
component of stockholders’ equity (accumulated other comprehensive income or loss) and do not affect earnings
until realized. The fair values of our investment securities are generally determined by reference to quoted
market prices and reliable independent sources. We are obligated to assess, at each reporting date, whether there
is an “other-than-temporary” impairment to our investment securities. ASC Topic 320 requires us to assess
whether we have the intent to sell the debt security or more likely than not will be required to sell the debt
security before its anticipated recovery. Other-than-temporary impairment related to credit losses will be
recognized in earnings. Other-than-temporary impairment related to all other factors will be recognized in other
comprehensive income.
Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes is based on income reported for financial statement purposes, and differs
from the amount of taxes currently payable, since certain income and expense items are reported for financial
statement purposes in different periods than those for tax reporting purposes. Taxes are discussed in more detail
in Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements presented elsewhere herein. Accrued taxes represent the net
estimated amount due or to be received from taxing authorities. In estimating accrued taxes, we assess the
relative merits and risks of the appropriate tax treatment of transactions taking into account statutory, judicial,
and regulatory guidance in the context of our tax position.
We account for income taxes using the asset and liability approach, the objective of which is to establish
deferred tax assets and liabilities for the temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax
basis of our assets and liabilities at enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when such amounts are realized or
settled. A valuation allowance is established for deferred tax assets if, based on the weight of available evidence,
it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
44
Goodwill and Goodwill Impairment
Goodwill represents the excess of costs over fair value of assets of businesses acquired. ASC Topic 805,
formerly SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations (Revised 2007), requires an entity to recognize the assets,
liabilities and any non-controlling interest at fair value as of the acquisition date. Contingent consideration is
required to be recognized and measured at fair value on the date of acquisition rather than at a later date when the
amount of that consideration may be determinable beyond a reasonable doubt. ASC Topic 805 also requires an
entity to expense acquisition-related costs as incurred rather than allocating such costs to the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed. Pre-acquisition contingencies are to be recognized at fair value, unless it is a non-contractual
contingency that is not likely to materialize, in which case, nothing should be recognized in purchase accounting
and, instead, that contingency would be subject to the probable and estimable recognition criteria of ASC Topic
450, “Accounting for Contingencies.” Goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a purchase business
combination and determined to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized, but instead are tested for
impairment at least annually in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 350, formerly SFAS No. 142.
SFAS No. 142 also requires that intangible assets with estimable useful lives be amortized over their respective
estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values, and reviewed for impairment in accordance with ASC
Topic 360, formerly SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.”
Our policy is to assess goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level on an annual basis or between
annual assessments if a triggering event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce
the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. Impairment is the condition that exists when the
carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. Accounting standards require management to
estimate the fair value of each reporting unit in making the assessment of impairment at least annually.
The impairment testing process conducted by us begins by assigning net assets and goodwill to our three
reporting units- Commercial Lending, Retail Banking, and East Coast Operations. We then complete “step one”
of the impairment test by comparing the fair value of each reporting unit (as determined based on the discussion
below) with the recorded book value (or “carrying amount”) of its net assets, with goodwill included in the
computation of the carrying amount. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of
that reporting unit is not considered impaired, and “step two” of the impairment test is not necessary. If the
carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, step two of the impairment test is performed to
determine the amount of impairment. Step two of the impairment test compares the carrying amount of the
reporting unit’s goodwill to the “implied fair value” of that goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is
computed by assuming all assets and liabilities of the reporting unit would be adjusted to the current fair value,
with the offset as an adjustment to goodwill. This adjusted goodwill balance is the implied fair value used in step
two. An impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its
implied fair value.
Valuation of Other Real Estate Owned (OREO)
Real estate acquired in the settlement of loans is initially recorded at fair value, less estimated costs to sell.
Specific valuation allowances on other real estate owned are recorded through charges to operations to recognize
declines in fair value subsequent to foreclosure. Gains on sales are recognized when certain criteria relating to the
buyer’s initial and continuing investment in the property are met.
Results of Operations
Overview
For the year ended December 31, 2010, we reported net loss attributable to common stockholders of
$4.8 million, or $0.06 per share, compared to net loss attributable to common stockholders of $83.7 million, or
$1.59 per share, in 2009 and net income attributable to common stockholders of $49.4 million, or $1.00 per
diluted share, in 2008. The $78.9 million, or 94.2%, decrease in net loss from 2009 to 2010 was primarily the
results of a decrease of $150.1 million in the provision for credit losses, a decrease of $20.1 million in other real
estate owned (“OREO”) expenses, and a $15.2 million increase in net interest income offset by a decrease of
45
$36.9 million in net securities gains, an increase of $14.3 million in prepayment penalties from prepayment of
FHLB advances, an increase of $8.3 million net loss in interest rate swap agreements, and a decrease of
$47.3 million in income tax benefit. The return on average assets in 2010 was 0.10%, improving from negative
0.58% in 2009, and decreasing from 0.47% in 2008. The return on average equity was 0.81% in 2010, improving
from a negative 5.20% in 2009 and decreasing from 4.91% in 2008.
Highlights
• Net loss attributable to common stockholders for 2010 was $4.8 million, a decrease of $78.9 million, or
94.2%, from 2009.
• Net loss per common share for 2010 was $0.06, a decrease of 96.2% compared with net loss per
common share of $1.59 for 2009.
• Net charge-offs decreased $92.9 million, or 42.4%, to $126.4 million for 2010 from $219.3 million for
2009. The provision for credit losses was $156.9 million for 2010 compared to $307.0 million for 2009.
Net (loss)/income available to common stockholders and key financial performance ratios are presented
below for the three years indicated:
Net income/(loss)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividends on preferred stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net (loss)/income available to common stockholders . . . . . .
Basic (loss)/earnings per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted (loss)/earnings per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Return on average assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Return on average stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total average assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total average equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Efficiency ratio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Effective income tax rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net Interest Income
2010
2009
2008
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
$
$
$
$
11,565
(16,388)
(4,823)
(0.06)
(0.06)
0.10%
0.81%
$
$
$
$
(67,390)
(16,338)
(83,728)
(1.59)
(1.59)
-0.58%
-5.20%
$
$
$
$
50,521
(1,140)
49,381
1.00
1.00
0.47%
4.91%
$11,489,165
$ 1,430,433
$11,544,807
$ 1,303,575
$10,736,130
$ 1,036,789
53.22%
477.45%
50.65%
48.11%
43.52%
27.67%
Net interest income increased $15.2 million, or 5.4%, from $282.7 million in 2009 to $297.9 million in
2010. Taxable-equivalent net interest income, using a statutory Federal income tax rate of 35%, totaled
$298.4 million in 2010, compared with $283.1 million in 2009, an increase of $15.3 million, or 5.4%. Interest
income on tax-exempt securities was $854,000, or $1.3 million on a tax-equivalent basis in 2010 compared to
$788,000, or $1.2 million on a tax-equivalent basis in 2009. The increase in net interest income was due
primarily to the decreases in interest expense paid for money market accounts, time deposits and the Federal
Home Loan Bank advances.
Average loans for 2010 were $6.90 billion, a $367.4 million, or a 5.1% decline from $7.27 billion in 2009.
Compared with 2009, average commercial mortgage loans decreased $108.2 million, or 2.6%, to $4.02 billion,
average commercial loans decreased $108.3 million, or 7.4%, and average real estate construction loans
decreased $279.6 million, or 34.1%. Offsetting the above decreases was an increase of $129.7 million, or 15.6%,
in average residential mortgage loans and equity lines. Average investment securities were $3.50 billion in 2010,
an increase of $268.0 million, or 8.3%, from 2009, due primarily to increases of U.S. agency securities of
$553.6 million offset by decreases of mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by the Government National
Mortgage Association of $296.4 million.
Average interest bearing deposits were $6.50 billion in 2010, a decrease of $110.1 million, or 1.7%, from
$6.61 billion in 2009 primarily due to decreases of $458.0 million in public time deposits and decreases of
$129.1 million in brokered time deposits offset by increases of $101.7 million in interest bearing demand
deposits, $106.9 million in money market and saving deposits, and $252.0 million in time deposits greater than
46
$100,000. Average FHLB advances and other borrowings decreased $154.0 million, or 15.4%, to $843.3 million
in 2010 from $997.3 million in 2009 primarily due to $379.4 million in prepayments of FHLB advances in 2010.
Taxable-equivalent interest income decreased $39.1 million, or 7.4%, to $490.1 million in 2010 primarily
due to decline in rates on investment securities and decreases in loan volume and by a change in the mix of
interest-earning assets as discussed below:
• Decrease in volume: Average interest-earning assets decreased $28.4 million, or 0.3%, to $10.78 billion in
2010, compared with the average interest-earning assets of $10.81 billion in 2009. The decrease in average
loan balance of $367.4 million in 2010 caused primarily the $21.6 million decline in interest income.
• Decline in rate: The taxable-equivalent yield on interest-earning assets decreased 35 basis points to
4.55% in 2010 from 4.90% in 2009 and was primarily caused by the yield earned on average taxable
securities decreasing 78 basis points to 3.07% in 2010 from 3.85% in 2009. The decline in rates among
interest earning assets caused interest income to decrease by $17.5 million.
• Change in the mix of interest-earnings assets: Average gross loans, which generally have a higher yield
than other types of investments, comprised 64.0% of total average interest-earning assets in 2010, a
decrease from 67.2% in 2009. Average securities comprised 32.5% of total average interest-bearing
assets in 2010 and increased from 29.9% in 2009.
Interest expense decreased by $54.3 million to $191.7 million in 2010 compared with $246.0 million in
2009 primarily due to decreased cost from time deposits, money market deposits, and FHLB advances. The
overall decrease in interest expense was primarily due to a net decrease in rate and a net decrease in volume as
discussed below:
• Decrease in volume: Average interest-bearing liabilities decreased $274.7 million in 2010, due primarily
to the decrease in public and brokered time deposits and the decrease in FHLB advances offset by
increases in interest bearing demand deposits, money market deposits, savings and time deposits greater
then $100,000. The decrease in volume caused interest expense to decline by $11.9 million.
• Decline in rate: The average cost of interest bearing liabilities decreased 52 basis points to 2.11% in
2010 from 2.63% in 2009 due primary to a decrease of 73 basis points in the average cost of interest
bearing deposits to 1.29% in 2010 from 2.02% in 2009. The decline in rate caused interest expense to
decline by $42.5 million.
• Change in the mix of interest-bearing liabilities: Average interest bearing deposits of $6.50 billion
increased to 71.6% of total interest-bearing liabilities in 2010 compared to 70.7% in 2009. Offsetting the
increases, average FHLB advances and other borrowing of $843.3 million decreased to 9.3% of total
interest-bearing liabilities in 2010 compared to 10.7% in 2009.
Our taxable-equivalent net interest margin, defined as taxable-equivalent net interest income to average
interest-earning assets, increased 15 basis points to 2.77% in 2010 from 2.62% in 2009. The increase in net
interest margin from the prior year primarily resulted from decreases in the rate on interest bearing deposits, and
the prepayment of FHLB advances contributed to the increase in the net interest margin.
Net interest income declined $12.5 million, or 4.2%, from $295.1 million in 2008 to $282.7 million in 2009.
Taxable-equivalent net interest income, using a statutory Federal income tax rate of 35%, totaled $283.1 million
in 2009, compared with $296.4 million in 2008. Interest income on tax-exempt securities was $788,000, or
$1.2 million on a tax-equivalent basis in 2009 compared to $2.9 million, or $4.2 million on a tax-equivalent basis
in 2008. The decrease was due primarily to the increases in interest expense paid for securities sold under
agreements to repurchase as a result of the expiration of initial below market interest rate periods. Between 2005
and 2008, the Bank increased its securities portfolio and funded these securities by entering into a number of
long term securities sold under agreements to repurchase transactions to increase net interest income. Average
non-interest bearing deposits remained steady between periods since the Bank’s customer base consistently
prefers to maintain deposits in the form of certificates of deposit.
47
Average loans for 2009 were $7.27 billion, which is $51.6 million, or 0.7%, higher than 2008 due primarily
to the growth in commercial mortgage loans. Compared with 2008, average commercial mortgage loans
increased $113.6 million, or 2.83%, to $4.13 billion, average residential mortgages and equity lines increased
$90.5 million, or 12.3%, to $829.4 million. Offsetting the above increases, average commercial loans decreased
$98.1 million, or 6.3%, to $1.46 billion and average construction loans decreased $50.7 million, or 5.8%, to
$819.7 million. Average securities were $3.24 billion, a significant increase of $724.8 million, or 28.9%, due
primarily to net increases of mortgage-backed securities of $773.2 million in 2009.
Average interest bearing deposits were $6.61 billion in 2009, an increase of $752.2 million, or 12.8%, from
$5.86 billion in 2008 primarily due to increases of $553.4 million, or 12.2%, in time deposits and increases of
$153.7 million, or 20.9%, in money market deposits. Average FHLB advances and other borrowings decreased
$180.6 million to $997.3 million in 2009 from $1.18 billion in 2008.
Taxable-equivalent interest income decreased $62.1 million, or 10.5%, to $529.2 million in 2009, primarily
due to decline in rates on loans and securities purchased under agreements to resell, which was partially offset by
increases in volume and by a change in the mix of interest-earning assets as discussed below:
•
Increase in volume: Average interest-earning assets increased $766.0 million, or 7.6%, to $10.8 billion in
2009, compared with average interest-earning assets of $10.0 billion in 2008. The increase in volume added
$26.6 million to interest income and was primarily attributable to the growth in investment securities.
• Decline in rate: The taxable-equivalent yield on interest-earning assets decreased 99 basis points to
4.90% in 2009 from 5.89% in 2008. The yield earned on average loans decreased 74 basis points to
5.53% in 2009 from 6.27% in 2008. The yield earned on average taxable securities decreased 86 basis
points to 3.85% in 2009 from 4.71% in 2008. The decline in rates among interest earning assets caused
interest income to decrease by $88.7 million.
• Change in the mix of interest-earnings assets: Average gross loans, which generally have a higher yield
than other types of investments, comprised 67.2% of total average interest- earning assets in 2009 and
decreased from 71.9% in 2008. Average securities comprised 29.9% of total average interest-bearing
assets in 2009 and increased from 25.0% in 2008.
Interest expense decreased by $48.8 million to $246.0 million in 2009 compared with $294.8 million in
2008 primarily due to decreased cost from time deposits offset by increased cost from securities sold under
agreement to repurchase. The overall decrease in interest expense was primarily due to a net decrease in rate
offset by a net increase in volume as discussed below:
•
Increase in volume: Average interest-bearing liabilities increased $548.3 billion in 2009, due
primarily to the growth of time deposits of $553.4 million and money market deposits of
$153.7 million, offset by decreases in FHLB advances and other borrowings of $180.6 million.
• Decline in rate: As a result of the declining interest rate environment during 2008, the average cost
of interest bearing liabilities decreased 72 basis points to 2.63% in 2009 from 3.35% in 2008.
• Change in the mix of interest-bearing liabilities: Average interest bearing deposits of $6.61 billion
increased to 70.7% of total interest-bearing liabilities in 2009 compared to 66.6% in 2008.
Offsetting the increases, average FHLB advances and other borrowing of $997.3 million decreased
to 10.7% of total interest-bearing liabilities in 2009 compared to 13.4% in 2008.
Our taxable-equivalent net interest margin, defined as taxable-equivalent net interest income to average
interest-earning assets, decreased 33 basis points to 2.62% in 2009 from 2.95% in 2008. The decrease in net
interest margin from the prior year primarily resulted from increases in non-accrual loans and the increase in the
borrowing rate on our long term repurchase agreements as discussed above and the increase in the average rate
paid on other borrowed funds as lower cost short term borrowings matured. The majority of our variable rate
loans contain interest rate floors, which help limit the impact of the recent decreases in the prime interest rate.
48
The following table sets forth information concerning average interest-earning assets, average interest-bearing
liabilities, and the yields and rates paid on those assets and liabilities. Average outstanding amounts included in the
table are daily averages.
Interest-Earning Assets and Interest-Bearing Liabilities
2010
Average
Balance
Interest
Income/
Expense (4)
Average
Yield/
Rate
(1)(2)
2009
Average
Balance
Interest
Income/
Expense (4)
Average
Yield/
Rate
(1)(2)
2008
Average
Balance
Interest
Income/
Expense (4)
Average
Yield/
Rate
(1)(2)
(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-Earning Assets:
Commercial loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,356,368
959,112
Residential mortgages . . . . . . . . . . . .
4,024,863
Commercial mortgages . . . . . . . . . . .
540,151
Real estate construction loans . . . . . .
18,382
Other loans and leases . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans and leases (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Taxable securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax-exempt securities (3) . . . . . . . . .
FHLB stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Federal funds sold & securities
purchased under agreement to
resell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest-bearing deposits . . . . . . . . . .
6,898,876
3,476,259
27,258
68,780
6,932
300,471
Total interest-earning assets . . . . . . . $10,778,576
Non-interest earning assets
Cash and due from banks . . . . . . . . .
Other non-earning assets . . . . . . . . . .
95,996
876,771
Total non-interest earning assets . . .
Less: Allowance for loan losses . . . .
Deferred loan fees . . . . . . . . . . .
972,767
(254,420)
(7,758)
$ 63,124
49,823
240,747
26,334
634
380,662
106,568
1,314
237
14
1,259
$490,054
5.52
3.07
4.82
0.34
0.20
0.42
4.55
4.65% $ 1,464,696
829,418
5.19
4,133,061
5.98
819,746
4.88
19,333
3.45
7,266,254
3,216,516
18,996
71,798
$ 69,648
43,742
251,343
36,339
759
401,831
123,939
1,212
149
4.76% $ 1,562,775
738,923
5.27
4,019,448
6.08
870,410
4.43
23,133
3.93
7,214,689
2,460,181
50,520
66,025
$ 86,056
42,124
269,232
53,748
1,056
452,216
115,890
4,155
3,301
58,482
174,939
1,351
673
$10,806,985
$529,155
111,736
803,789
915,525
(168,530)
(9,173)
234,896
14,631
15,017
656
$10,040,942
$591,235
85,928
700,737
786,665
(81,066)
(10,411)
5.53
3.85
6.38
0.21
2.31
0.38
4.90
5.51%
5.70
6.70
6.18
4.56
6.27
4.71
8.22
5.00
6.39
4.48
5.89
Total Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $11,489,165
$11,544,807
$10,736,130
Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand accounts . .
Money market accounts . . . . . . . . . .
Savings accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Time deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total interest-bearing deposits . . . . .
Federal funds purchased . . . . . . . . . .
Securities sold under agreement to
397,434
966,888
369,190
4,765,632
6,499,144
—
927
8,733
694
73,808
84,162
—
repurchase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,560,215
66,141
FHLB advances and other
borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
843,321
171,136
37,533
3,852
Total interest-bearing
0.23
0.90
0.19
1.55
1.29
—
4.24
4.45
2.25
295,770
890,427
338,781
5,084,309
6,609,287
8,392
1,059
13,233
799
118,465
133,556
23
1,562,447
65,182
997,277
171,136
42,443
4,835
0.36
1.49
0.24
2.33
2.02
0.27
4.17
4.26
2.83
255,185
736,739
334,222
4,530,923
5,857,069
40,128
1,544
13,581
1,188
161,397
177,710
903
1,554,023
60,559
1,177,869
171,136
46,542
9,090
0.61
1.84
0.36
3.56
3.03
2.25
3.90
3.95
5.31
liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9,073,816
191,688
2.11
9,348,539
246,039
2.63
8,800,225
294,804
3.35
Non-interest bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . .
911,351
73,565
1,430,433
Total liabilities and stockholders’
equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $11,489,165
781,391
111,302
1,303,575
772,982
126,134
1,036,789
$11,544,807
$10,736,130
Net interest spread (4) . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net interest income (4) . . . . . . . . . . .
Net interest margin (4) . . . . . . . . . . .
$298,366
2.44%
2.77%
$283,116
2.27%
2.62%
$296,431
2.54%
2.95%
(1) Yields and amounts of interest earned include loan fees. Non- accrual loans are included in the average balance.
(2) Calculated by dividing net interest income by average outstanding interest-earning assets.
(3) The average yield has been adjusted to a fully taxable-equivalent basis for certain securities of states and political subdivisions and
other securities held using a statutory Federal income tax rate of 35%.
(4) Net interest income, net interest spread, and net interest margin on interest-earning assets have been adjusted to a fully taxable-
equivalent basis using a statutory Federal income tax rate of 35%.
49
Taxable-Equivalent Net Interest Income — Changes Due to Rate and Volume(1)
2010 - 2009
Increase/(Decrease) in
Net Interest Income Due to:
2009 - 2008
Increase/(Decrease) in
Net Interest Income Due to:
Change in
Volume
Change in
Rate
Total
Change
Change in
Volume
Change in
Rate
Total
Change
(In thousands)
$
521
$
65
$
586
$ 1,123
$ (1,106) $
17
(657)
(1,332)
160
2
(20,273)
(680)
(16,039)
(58)
86
(896)
(1,337)
(17,371)
102
88
(21,169)
(7,386)
31,555
(2,165)
266
3,210
(6,280)
(23,506)
(778)
(3,418)
(53,595)
(13,666)
8,049
(2,943)
(3,152)
(50,385)
Interest-Earning Assets
Deposits with other banks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Federal funds sold and securities purchased
under agreement to resell . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Taxable securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax-exempt securities (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FHLB Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total (decrease)/increase in interest
income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(21,579)
(17,522)
(39,101)
26,603
(88,683)
(62,080)
Interest-Earning Liabilities
Interest-bearing demand accounts . . . . . . . . .
Money market accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Savings accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Time deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Federal funds purchased . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities sold under agreement to
repurchase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FHLB advances and other borrowings . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term debt
Total (decrease)/increase in interest
26
(342)
(7)
(7,033)
(23)
35
(4,536)
—
(158)
(4,158)
(98)
(37,624)
—
(132)
(4,500)
(105)
(44,657)
(23)
924
(374)
(983)
959
(4,910)
(983)
217
2,548
16
17,933
(417)
330
(7,502)
—
(702)
(2,896)
(405)
(60,865)
(463)
(485)
(348)
(389)
(42,932)
(880)
4,293
3,403
(4,255)
4,623
(4,099)
(4,255)
expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(11,880)
(42,471)
(54,351)
13,125
(61,890)
(48,765)
Change in net interest income . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ (9,699) $ 24,949
$ 15,250
$13,478
$(26,793) $(13,315)
(1) Changes in interest income and interest expense attributable to changes in both volume and rate have been
allocated proportionately to changes due to volume and changes due to rate.
(2) The amount of interest earned has been adjusted to a fully tax-equivalent basis for certain securities of states
and political subdivisions and other securities held using a statutory federal income tax rate of 35%.
Provision for Credit Losses
The provision for credit losses represents the charge against current earnings that is determined by
management, through a credit review process, as the amount needed to maintain an allowance for loan losses and
an allowance for off-balance sheet unfunded credit commitments that management believes to be sufficient to
absorb credit losses inherent in the Bank’s loan portfolio and credit commitments. The Bank recorded a
$156.9 million provision for credit losses in 2010 compared with $307.0 million in 2009, and $106.7 million in
2008. Net charge-offs for 2010 were $126.4 million, or 1.8% of average loans, compared to net charge-offs for
2009 of $219.3 million, or 3.0% of average loans, and compared to net charge-offs for 2008 of $46.8 million, or
0.65% of average loans. The decreases in provision for credit losses and net charge-offs in 2010 were primarily
due to decreases in non-performing loans.
50
Non-interest Income
Non-interest income was $32.3 million for 2010, $78.7 million for 2009, and $18.9 million for 2008. Non-
interest income includes depository service fees, letters of credit commissions, securities gains (losses), gains
(losses) from loan sales, gains from sale of premises and equipment, and other sources of fee income. These
other fee-based services include wire transfer fees, safe deposit fees, fees on loan-related activities, fee income
from our Wealth Management division, and foreign exchange fees.
The decrease in non-interest income of $46.4 million, or 59.0%, from 2009 to 2010 was primarily due to a
combination of the following:
• A $36.9 million decrease in securities gains. We sold securities of $1.1 billion and recorded net gains on
sale of securities of $19.3 million in 2010 compared to security sales of $2.4 billion with $56.5 million
net gains on sale of securities in 2009.
• An $8.3 million increase in loss on the value of interest rate swap agreements of which $5.8 million was
from an increase in the unrealized loss during 2010.
• A $3.8 million decrease in gains on sale of loans. In 2009, there was a gain of $3.3 million from the sale
of an aircraft leveraged lease.
• A $1.2 million increase in wealth management commissions and a $1.3 million increase in venture
capital income mainly due to lower write-downs on venture capital investments.
The increase of $59.7 million, or 316%, from 2008 to 2009 in non-interest income was primarily due to a
combination of the following:
• We sold securities of $2.4 billion and recorded net gains on sale of securities of $56.5 million in 2009
compared to gains on sale of securities of $29.4 million in 2008. In 2008, there was an other-than-
temporary impairment charge of $35.3 million on agency preferred securities. These factors contributed
to a $61.6 million increase in gains on securities in 2009.
• A $4.4 million increase in gains on sale of loans primarily due to gains of $3.3 million from the sale of
an aircraft leveraged lease.
• A $2.4 million loss on the value of interest rate swap agreements.
• A $2.4 million decrease in commissions from foreign exchange and currency transactions.
• A $1.8 million decrease in venture capital income primarily due to write-downs on venture capital
investment of $2.0 million.
The Bank purchased preferred stock issued by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae of $5.0 million in 2000,
$20.0 million in 2001, $23.0 million in December, 2007, and $1.4 million in January, 2008. The Bank recognized
an other-than-temporary impairment loss of $5.5 million in 2004, $115,000 in 2005, and $35,000 in 2006 from
write downs of the value of these securities to their respective fair values. In March 2007, the Bank sold its
Freddie Mac preferred stock that was purchased in March 2001 with a carrying value of $7.6 million and
recorded a gain of $2.2 million. In September 2008, the Federal Housing Finance Agency placed Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac under receivership and suspended indefinitely the payment of future dividends on their issues of
preferred stock. In light of these developments, the Bank recognized an additional other-than-temporary
impairment loss of $35.3 million in 2008 to write down the value of these securities to their respective fair values
as of December 31, 2008.
Non-interest Expense
Non-interest expense includes expenses related to salaries and benefits of employees, occupancy expenses,
marketing expenses, computer and equipment expenses, amortization of core deposit intangibles, and other
51
operating expenses. Non-interest expense totaled $175.7 million in 2010, compared with $183.0 million in 2009,
and $136.7 million in 2008. The decrease of $7.3 million, or 4.0%, in non-interest expense in 2010 compared to
2009 was primarily due to decreases in other real estate owned (“OREO”) expense offset by increases in
prepayment penalty from prepaying FHLB advances and by increases in write-downs on loans held for sale. In
2010, OREO expense decreased $20.1 million primarily due to a $12.0 million increase in gains on OREO sales
and transfers and an $8.1 million decrease in provision for OREO write-downs. In addition, occupancy expenses
decreased $3.9 million in 2010 primarily due to a correction in the depreciation life for certain components of our
administrative office building at 9650 Flair Drive, El Monte, California, which opened in January 2009. Salaries
and employee benefits also decreased $2.0 million primarily due to decreases in option compensation expenses.
Offsetting the above decreases were increases of $14.3 million in prepayment penalty arising from prepaying
$379.4 million of FHLB advances in 2010 and increases of $3.2 million in write-downs on loans held for sale.
The efficiency ratio, defined as non-interest expense divided by the sum of net interest income before
provision for loan losses plus non-interest income, increased to 53.22% in 2010 compared with 50.65% in 2009
due primarily to lower non-interest income as explained above.
Non-interest expense totaled $183.0 million in 2009 compared with $136.7 million in 2008. The increase of
$46.4 million, or 33.9%, in non-interest expense in 2009 compared to 2008 was primarily due to a combination
of the following:
• OREO expense increased $31.1 million primarily due to a $24.6 million increase in provision for OREO
write-downs, and a $4.0 million increase in OREO operating expenses due to increased OREO holdings.
In addition, loss on sale of OREO increased $2.1 million and OREO income decreased $466,000.
•
•
FDIC and State assessments increased $14.6 million to $19.4 million in 2009 from $4.8 million in 2008
as a result of a higher assessment rate and higher assessed deposit balances.
Professional service expense increased $4.4 million, or 36.8%, due primarily to increases in legal
expenses, collection expenses, and consulting expenses.
• Occupancy expense increased $2.9 million, or 21.7%, primarily due to our new administrative offices at
9650 Flair Drive, El Monte which opened in January 2009.
• Decreases of $5.8 million in salaries and employee benefits and a decrease of $1.0 million in marketing
expenses. Salaries and employee benefits decreased due to a $2.6 million decrease in bonus accruals, a
$2.0 million decrease in option compensation expense, and a $940,000 decrease in salaries.
The efficiency ratio, defined as non-interest expense divided by the sum of net interest income before
provision for loan losses plus non-interest income, increased to 50.65% in 2009 compared to 43.52% in 2008 due
primarily to higher non-interest expenses as explained above.
Income Tax Expense
Income tax benefit was $14.6 million in 2010 compared to an income tax benefit of $61.9 million in 2009
and income tax expense of $19.6 million in 2008. The effective tax rate was 477% for 2010, 48.1% for 2009, and
27.7% in 2008. The effective tax rate differed from the composite statutory composite rate of 42% primarily as a
result of low income housing and other tax credits totaling $11.2 million, $10.6 million and $9.5 million
recognized during 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The income tax benefit in 2010 and 2009 was primarily
due to the net loss in both years.
Our tax returns are open for audits by the Internal Revenue Service back to 2007 and by the FTB of the
State of California back to 2003. We are currently under audit by the Internal Revenue Service for the years 2007
through 2009 and by the California FTB for the years 2003 to 2004. From time to time, there may be differences
in opinion with respect to the tax treatment accorded transactions. When, and if, such differences occur and the
related tax effects become probable and estimable, such amounts will be recognized.
52
Financial Condition
Total assets were $10.8 billion at December 31, 2010, a decrease of $786.2 million, or 6.8%, from
$11.6 billion at December 31, 2009, primarily due to the decrease of $706.4 million, or 19.9%, in investment
securities and the decrease of $82.5 million, or 1.2%, in gross loans, including loans held for sale.
Investment Securities
Investment securities were $2.8 billion and represented 26.33% of total assets at December 31, 2010,
compared with $3.6 billion, or 30.64% of total assets at December 31, 2009, primarily due to $3.3 billion in
securities matured, called and paid-off and $1.1 billion in securities sold, offset by $3.6 billion in securities
purchased in 2010. The following table summarizes the carrying value of our portfolio of securities for each of
the past two years:
As of December 31,
2010
2009
(In thousands)
Securities Held-to-Maturity:
U.S. government sponsored entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and municipal securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mortgage-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
99,921
130,107
600,107
9,967
$
99,876
—
535,139
—
Total securities held-to-maturity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 840,102
$ 635,015
Securities Available-for-Sale:
U.S. treasury securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
U.S. government sponsored entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and municipal securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mortgage-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Collateralized mortgage obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Asset-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mutual funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Preferred stock of government sponsored entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trust preferred securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other securities-foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 118,828
825,082
1,718
642,305
25,194
240
331,991
3,927
719
14,437
37,434
1,692
$
13,748
871,344
12,823
1,942,176
47,789
249
9,757
—
1,272
—
14,891
1,050
Total securities available-for-sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$2,003,567
$2,915,099
Total investment securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$2,843,669
$3,550,114
ASC Topic 320 changes the requirements for recognizing other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) for
debt securities. ASC Topic 320 requires an entity to assess whether it has the intent to sell the debt security or
more likely than not will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. If either of these
conditions is met, an entity must recognize an OTTI. If an entity does not intend to sell the debt security and will
not be required to sell the debt security, the entity must consider whether it will recover the amortized cost basis
of the security. If the present value of expected cash flows is less than the amortized cost basis of the security,
OTTI shall be considered to have occurred. OTTI is then separated into the amount of the total impairment
related to credit losses and the amount of the total impairment related to all other factors. An entity determines
the impairment related to credit losses by comparing the present value of cash flows expected to be collected
from the security with the amortized cost basis of the security. OTTI related to the credit loss is thereafter
recognized in earnings. OTTI related to all other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income. OTTI not
related to the credit loss for a held-to-maturity security should be recognized separately in a new category of
53
other comprehensive income and amortized over the remaining life of the debt security as an increase in the
carrying value of the security only when the entity does not intend to sell the security and it is not more likely
than not that the entity will be required to sell the security before recovery of its remaining amortized cost basis.
The temporarily impaired securities represent 45.3% of the fair value of investment securities as of
December 31, 2010. Unrealized losses for securities with unrealized losses for less than twelve months represent
2.4%, and securities with unrealized losses for twelve months or more represent 2.1%, of the historical cost of
these securities. Unrealized losses on these securities generally resulted from increases in interest rate spreads
subsequent to the date that these securities were purchased. All of these securities were investment grade as of
December 31, 2010. At December 31, 2010, nine issues of securities had unrealized losses for 12 months or
longer and 184 issues of securities had unrealized losses of less than 12 months.
At December 31, 2010, management believed the impairment was temporary and, accordingly, no
impairment loss has been recognized in our consolidated statements of operations. We expect to recover the
amortized cost basis of our debt securities, and have no intent to sell and will not be required to sell
available-for-sale debt securities that have declined below their cost before their anticipated recovery. The table
below shows the fair value, unrealized losses, and number of issuances of the temporarily impaired securities in
our investment securities portfolio as of December 31, 2010, and December 31, 2009:
Temporarily Impaired Securities
As of December 31, 2010
Less than 12 months
12 months or longer
Total
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
No. of
Issuances
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
No. of
Issuances
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
No. of
Issuances
(Dollars in thousands)
Securities Held-to-Maturity
State and municipal
securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 121,161
89,439
Mortgage-backed securities . .
Other securities-foreign
organization . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9,954
$ 8,946
1,653
13
122
2
1
$ —
—
—
$—
—
—
Total securities
held-to-maturity . . . . . . $ 220,554
$10,612
125
$ —
$—
Securities Available-for-Sale
U.S. treasury entities . . . . . . . . $ 118,828
U.S. government sponsored
entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
578,118
$ 6,745
6,840
State and municipal
securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mortgage-backed securities . .
Mortgage-backed
securities-Non-agency . . . . .
Collateralized mortgage
obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Asset-backed securities . . . . . .
Corporate bonds . . . . . . . . . . .
Mutual fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trust preferred securities . . . . .
Other securities-foreign
organization . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total securities
1,718
354
—
—
—
283,376
3,927
10,384
157
4
—
—
—
5,792
73
170
27,254
646
available-for-sale . . . . . $1,023,959
$20,427
Total investment securities . . . $1,244,513
$31,039
5
12
2
7
—
—
—
27
1
2
3
59
184
$ —
$—
—
—
32
10,127
887
240
—
—
—
—
—
—
1
118
115
5
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1
3
4
1
—
—
—
—
$ 121,161
89,439
$ 8,946
1,653
9,954
13
122
2
1
$ 220,554
$10,612
125
$ 118,828
$ 6,745
578,118
6,840
1,718
386
10,127
887
240
283,376
3,927
10,384
157
5
118
115
5
5,792
73
170
27,254
646
5
12
2
8
3
4
1
27
1
2
3
$11,286
$11,286
$239
$239
9
9
$1,035,245
$20,666
$1,255,799
$31,278
68
193
54
Temporarily Impaired Securities
As of December 31, 2009
Less than 12 months
12 months or longer
Total
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
No. of
Issuances
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
No. of
Issuances
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
No. of
Issuances
Securities Held-to-Maturity
Mortgage-backed securities . . . . . . . . $ 527,845
$ 7,294
Total securities
held-to-maturity . . . . . . . . . . . $ 527,845
$ 7,294
(Dollars in thousands)
12
12
$ — $ —
$ — $ —
Securities Available-for-Sale
U.S. Treasury entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
U.S. government sponsored
13,748
$
77
2
$ — $ —
408,888
entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and municipal securities . . . . . .
—
Mortgage-backed securities . . . . . . . . 1,050,968
Mortgage-backed
securities-Non-agency . . . . . . . . . .
—
Collateralized mortgage
obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Asset-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other securities-foreign
organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
30,870
—
249
14,891
3,230
—
6,216
—
955
—
1
84
9
—
32
—
—
4
1
3
—
659
855
—
36
3
12,302
1,156
8,304
249
9,508
—
683
63
488
—
Total securities
available-for-sale . . . . . . . . . . $1,519,614
$10,563
Total investment securities . . . . . . . . . $2,047,459
$17,857
51
63
$31,877
$2,429
$31,877
$2,429
—
—
—
—
1
5
3
8
1
3
—
21
21
$ 527,845
$ 7,294
$ 527,845
$ 7,294
$
13,748
$
77
408,888
659
1,051,823
3,230
36
6,219
12,302
1,156
39,174
249
9,757
14,891
1,638
63
489
84
$1,551,491
$12,992
$2,079,336
$20,286
12
12
2
9
1
37
3
12
1
4
3
72
84
55
The scheduled maturities and taxable-equivalent yields by security type are presented in the following
tables:
Securities Portfolio Maturity Distribution and Yield Analysis:
As of December 31, 2010
One Year
or Less
After One
Year to
Five Years
After Five
Years to
Ten Years
Over Ten
Years
Total
(Dollars in thousands)
Maturity Distribution:
Securities Held-to-Maturity:
U.S. government sponsored entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and municipal securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mortgage-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other securities-foreign organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ — $ 99,921
—
—
—
—
—
—
$ — $
6,235
—
9,967
— $
123,872
600,107
—
99,921
130,107
600,107
9,967
Total securities held-to-maturity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ — $ 99,921
$ 16,202
$ 723,979
$ 840,102
Securities Available-for-Sale:
U.S. treasury securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
U.S. government sponsored entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and municipal securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mortgage-backed securities(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Collateralized mortgage obligations(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Asset-backed securities(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mutual funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Preferred stock of government sponsored entities (2) . . . . . .
Trust preferred securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other securities-foreign organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ — $ — $118,828
224,041
500,309
100,732
—
—
—
109,022
621
10,246
23,089
—
—
—
—
—
289,320
14,837
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
9,668
27,766
—
—
—
—
$
— $ 118,828
825,082
—
1,718
1,718
642,305
522,416
25,194
2,105
240
240
331,991
27,834
3,927
3,927
719
719
14,437
14,437
37,434
—
1,692
1,692
Total securities available-for-sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$110,978
$543,533
$773,968
$ 575,088
$2,003,567
Total investment securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$110,978
$643,454
$790,170
$1,299,067
$2,843,669
Weighted-Average Yield:
Securities Held-to-Maturity:
U.S. government sponsored entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and municipal securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mortgage-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other securities-foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total securities held-to-maturity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities Available-for-Sale:
U.S. treasury securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
U.S. government sponsored entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and municipal securities(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mortgage-backed securities(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Collateralized mortgage obligations(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Asset-backed securities(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trust preferred securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other securities-foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
—
—
—
—
—
1.25
—
4.78
—
—
—
—
—
Total securities available-for-sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total investment securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.58%
1.58%
2.17%
—
—
—
2.17%
—
1.91%
—
6.07
—
—
2.54
—
2.40
1.95%
1.99%
—
4.66
—
4.00
—
4.77
3.46
—
4.53%
3.68%
1.80%
1.98
—
4.47
4.94
—
4.95
—
2.54
3.51%
3.53%
—
—
4.82
3.52
6.61
2.25
6.88
6.17
—
3.72%
3.70%
2.17%
4.77
3.46
4.00
3.51%
1.80%
1.85
4.82
3.70
5.08
2.25
5.01
6.17
2.43
3.05%
3.19%
(1) Securities reflect stated maturities and do not reflect the impact of anticipated prepayments.
(2) There is no stated maturity for equity securities.
(3) Weighted average yield has been adjusted to a fully-taxable equivalent basis.
56
Loans
Loans represented 64.0% of average interest-earning assets during 2010 compared with 67.2% during 2009.
Gross loans, including loans held for sale, decreased by $82.5 million, a decrease of 1.2%, to $6.87 billion at
December 31, 2010, compared with $6.95 billion at December 31, 2009, due to the continuing weak economy in
2010. The decline in gross loans was primarily attributable to the following:
• At December 31, 2010, loans held for sale were $2.9 million, a decrease of $51.9 million, or 94.8%,
from $54.8 million at December 31, 2009. In 2010, $31.7 million loans held for sale was sold with net
gains of $779,000 and $21.5 million loans held for sale was transferred to OREO. Loans transferred to
held for sale were $4.3 million and write-downs on loans held for sale were $2.9 million in 2010.
• Real estate construction loans decreased $216.1 million, or 34.5%, to $410.0 million at December 31,
2010, compared to $626.1 million at December 31, 2009.
• Commercial mortgage loans, excluding $2.9 million of commercial mortgage loans held for sale,
decreased $125.1 million, or 3.1%, to $3.94 billion at December 31, 2010, compared to $4.07 billion at
December 31, 2009. Total commercial mortgage loans accounted for 57.4% of gross loans at
December 31, 2010, compared to 58.9% at December 31, 2009. Commercial mortgage loans include
primarily commercial retail properties, shopping centers, and owner-occupied industrial facilities, and,
secondarily, office buildings, multiple-unit apartments, hotels, and multi-tenanted industrial properties,
and are typically secured by first deeds of trust on such commercial properties. In addition, the Bank
provides medium-term commercial real estate loans secured by commercial or industrial buildings
where the borrower either uses the property for business purposes or derives income from tenants.
• Commercial loans increased $133.3 million, or 10.2%, to $1.44 billion at December 31, 2010, compared
to $1.31 billion at December 31, 2009. Commercial loans consist primarily of short-term loans
(typically with a maturity of one year or less) to support general business purposes, or to provide
working capital to businesses in the form of lines of credit, trade-finance loans, loans for commercial
purposes secured by cash, and SBA loans.
•
Total residential mortgage loans increased by $170.2 million, or 24.9%, to $852.5 million at
December 31, 2010, compared to $682.3 million at December 31, 2009, primarily due to the low level
of interest rates.
Our lending relates predominantly to activities in the states of California, New York, Texas, Washington,
Massachusetts, Illinois, and New Jersey, although we have some loans to domestic clients who are engaged in
international trade. Our branch in Hong Kong generated loans outstanding of $78.3 million as of December 31,
2010, compared to $45.6 million as of December 31, 2009.
57
The classification of loans by type and amount outstanding as of December 31 for each of the past five years
is presented below:
Loan Type and Mix
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
As of December 31,
(In thousands)
Commercial loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,441,167 $1,307,880 $1,620,438 $1,435,861 $1,243,756
574,422
Residential mortgage loans and equity lines . . . . . .
3,226,658
Commercial mortgage loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
685,206
Real estate construction loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
17,504
Installment and other loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
791,497
4,132,850
913,168
14,415
878,266
4,065,155
626,087
21,754
663,707
3,762,689
799,230
22,158
1,061,330
3,940,061
409,986
16,077
Gross loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6,868,621
6,899,142
7,472,368
6,683,645
5,747,546
Less:
Allowance for loan losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unamortized deferred loan fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(245,231)
(7,621)
(211,889)
(8,339)
(122,093)
(10,094)
(64,983)
(10,583)
(60,220)
(11,984)
Total loans and leases, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $6,615,769 $6,678,914 $7,340,181 $6,608,079 $5,675,342
Loans held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
2,873 $
54,826 $
— $
— $
—
The loan maturities in the table below are based on contractual maturities. As is customary in the banking
industry, loans that meet underwriting criteria can be renewed by mutual agreement between us and the borrower.
Because we are unable to estimate the extent to which our borrowers will renew their loans, the table is based on
contractual maturities. As a result, the data shown below should not be viewed as an indication of future cash flows.
Contractual Maturity of Loan Portfolio
Commercial loans
Floating rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fixed rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Residential mortgage loans and equity lines
Floating rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fixed rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial mortgage loans
Floating rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fixed rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Real estate construction loans
Floating rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fixed rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Installment and other loans
Floating rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fixed rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total Loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Floating rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fixed rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total Loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Allowance for loan losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unamortized deferred loan fees . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans held-for-sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Within One Year One to Five Years Over Five Years
Total
(In thousands)
$ 806,117
277,922
$ 264,914
50,724
$
38,201
3,289
$1,109,232
331,935
748
29,929
1,267,708
818,569
41,106
17,226
100
338
$2,491,362
$1,574,576
916,786
2,491,362
221,119
804,758
791,367
332,076
1,887
—
—
—
$2,192,697
$1,052,574
1,140,123
2,192,697
221,871
839,459
2,544,402
1,395,659
385,861
24,125
2,250
13,827
$6,868,621
$4,263,616
2,605,005
6,868,621
(245,231)
(7,621)
$6,615,769
$
2,873
4
4,772
485,327
245,014
342,868
6,899
2,150
13,489
$2,184,562
$1,636,466
548,096
2,184,562
58
Deposits
The Bank primarily uses customer deposits to fund its operations, and to a lesser extent borrowings in the
form of securities sold under agreements to repurchase, advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank, and other
borrowings. The Bank’s deposits are generally obtained from the Bank’s geographic market area. The Bank
utilizes traditional marketing methods to attract new customers and deposits, by offering a wide variety of
products and services and utilizing various forms of advertising media. Although the vast majority of the Bank’s
deposits are retail in nature, the Bank does engage in certain wholesale activities, primarily accepting time
deposits from political subdivisions and public agencies. The Bank considers wholesale deposits to be an
alternative borrowing source rather than a customer relationship and, as such, their levels are determined by
management’s decisions as to the most economic funding sources. Brokered-deposits totaled $417.8 million, or
6.0% of total deposits, at December 31, 2010, compared to $852.9 million, or 11.4%, at December 31, 2009, and
public time deposits totaled $10.0 million, or 0.1%, of total deposits, at December 31, 2010, compared to
$98.1 million, or 1.3%, of total deposits at December 31, 2009.
The Bank’s total deposits decreased $513.2 million, or 6.8%, from $7.51 billion at December 31, 2009, to
$6.99 billion at December 31, 2010, primarily due to a $435.1 million, or 51.0%, decrease in brokered deposits, a
$113.9 million decrease in other time deposits of $100,000 or more from our Hong Kong branch, and a
$88.1 million, or 89.8%, decrease in public time deposits. Offsetting the above decreases were total increases of
$224.1 million, or 9.0%, in demand, money market, and saving accounts in 2010.
The following table displays the deposit mix for the past three years:
Deposit Mix
Year Ended December 31,
2010
2009
2008
Amount
Percentage
Amount
Percentage
Amount
Percentage
Demand accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NOW accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Money market accounts . . . . . . . . . .
Saving accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Time deposits under $100,000 . . . . .
Time deposits of $100,000 or
$ 930,300
418,703
982,617
385,245
1,081,266
(Dollars in thousands)
13.3% $ 864,551
337,304
6.0
943,164
14.0
347,724
5.5
1,529,954
15.5
11.5% $ 730,433
257,234
4.5
659,454
12.6
316,263
4.6
1,644,407
20.4
10.7%
3.8
9.6
4.6
24.1
more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3,193,715
45.7
3,482,343
46.4
3,228,945
47.2
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$6,991,846
100.0% $7,505,040
100.0% $6,836,736
100.0%
Average total deposits increased $19.8 million, or 0.27%, to $7.41 billion in 2010 compared with average
total deposits of $7.39 billion in 2009.
59
The following table displays average deposits and rates for the past five years:
Average Deposits and Average Rates
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
Amount %
Amount %
Amount %
Amount %
Amount %
(Dollars in thousands)
Demand accounts . . . . . . . . . $ 911,351 — % $ 781,391 — % $ 772,982 — % $ 782,347 — % $ 761,991 — %
NOW accounts . . . . . . . . . . .
Money market accounts . . . .
Saving accounts . . . . . . . . . .
Time deposits . . . . . . . . . . . .
397,434 0.23
966,888 0.90
369,190 0.19
4,765,632 1.55
232,114 1.22
699,606 3.08
344,066 0.95
3,852,468 4.72
295,770 0.36
890,427 1.49
338,781 0.24
5,084,309 2.33
237,113 1.18
599,210 2.69
374,570 0.91
3,344,931 4.12
255,185 0.61
736,739 1.84
334,222 0.36
4,530,923 3.56
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $7,410,495 1.14% $7,390,678 1.81% $6,630,051 2.68% $5,910,601 3.54% $5,317,815 3.01%
Management considers the Bank’s time deposits of $100,000 or more (Jumbo CDs) to be generally less
volatile than other wholesale funding sources primarily because:
•
•
•
approximately 57.9% of the Bank’s Jumbo CDs have been on deposit with the Bank for two years or
more;
the Jumbo CD portfolio is widely-held with 14,978 individual accounts averaging approximately
$203,463 per account owned by 9,385 individual depositors as of December 31, 2010; and
the ratio of relatively higher percentage of Jumbo CDs to total deposits exists in most of the Asian-
American banks in our California market because of a higher savings rate within the communities we
serve.
Management monitors the Jumbo CD portfolio to identify any changes in the deposit behavior in the market
and of the customers the Bank is serving.
Of our Jumbo CDs, approximately 98.4% matured within one year as of December 31, 2010. The following
tables display time deposits of $100,000 or more by maturity:
Time Deposits of $100,000 or More by Maturity
Less than three months . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Three to six months . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Six to twelve months . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Over one year
At December 31, 2010
(In thousands)
$1,124,723
747,612
1,270,543
50,837
Total
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$3,193,715
60
The following table displays time deposits with a remaining term of more than one year at December 31, 2010:
Maturities of Time Deposits with a Remaining Term
of More Than One Year for Each
of the Five Years Following December 31, 2010
2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(In thousands)
$191,408
24,211
60
150
—
Borrowings
Borrowings include securities sold under agreements to repurchase, federal funds purchased, funds obtained
as advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of San Francisco, and borrowings from other financial
institutions.
There were no federal funds purchased as of December 31, 2010, and December 31, 2009. At December 31,
2010, other borrowings from a financial institution were $8.5 million with a weighted average rate of 0.48%
compared to $7.2 million with a weighted average rate of 0.57% at December 31, 2009. Other borrowings of
$5.9 million will mature in 2011 and $2.6 million will mature in the first quarter of 2012.
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase were $1.6 billion with a weighted average rate of 4.18% at
December 31, 2010, compared to $1.6 billion with a weighted average rate of 4.19% at December 31, 2009.
Seventeen floating-to-fixed rate agreements totaling $900.0 million are with initial floating rates for a period of
time ranging from six months to one year, with the floating rates ranging from the three-month LIBOR minus
100 basis points to the three-month LIBOR minus 340 basis points. Thereafter, the rates are fixed for the
remainder of the term, with interest rates ranging from 4.29% to 5.07%. After the initial floating rate term, the
counterparties have the right to terminate the transaction at par at the fixed rate reset date and quarterly
thereafter. Thirteen fixed-to-floating rate agreements totaling $650.0 million are with initial fixed rates ranging
from 1.00% and 3.50% with initial fixed rate terms ranging from six months to eighteen months. For the
remainder of the seven year term, the rates float at 8% minus the three-month LIBOR rate with a maximum rate
ranging from 3.25% to 3.75% and minimum rate of 0.0%. After the initial fixed rate term, the counterparties
have the right to terminate the transaction at par at the floating rate reset date and quarterly thereafter. At
December 31, 2010, there was one short-term securities sold under agreements to repurchase of $11.0 million at
rate of 0.9% which matured on January 4, 2011, and two callable agreements of $100.0 million at a weighted rate
of 4.77% will mature in March 2011. Quarterly average balance for securities sold under agreements to
repurchase was $1.6 billion for all quarters in 2010, in 2009 and in 2008. The table below provides summary data
for callable securities sold under agreements to repurchase as of December 31, 2010:
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
(Dollars in millions)
Fixed-to-floating
Floating-to-fixed
Total
Callable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . All callable at December 31, 2010 All callable at December 31, 2010
Rate type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rate index . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Floating Rate
8% minus three month LIBOR
Fixed Rate
Maximum rate . . . . . . . . . . .
Minimum rate . . . . . . . . . . .
No. of agreements . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amount
Weighted average rate . . . . .
Final maturity . . . . . . . . . . .
3.75% 3.50% 3.50% 3.25%
0.0%
0.0% 0.0%
3
$150.0
0.0%
5
$250.0
4
$200.0
1
$ 50.0
2
$100.0
1
$ 50.0
10
$550.0
4
$200.0
30
$1,550.0
3.75% 3.50% 3.50% 3.25% 4.77% 4.83% 4.54% 5.00%
2014
2011
2014
2015
2014
2017
2012
2015
4.20%
61
These transactions are accounted for as collateralized financing transactions and recorded at the amount at
which the securities were sold. We may have to provide additional collateral for the repurchase agreements, as
necessary. The underlying collateral pledged for the repurchase agreements consists of U.S. Treasury securities,
U.S. government agency security debt, and mortgage-backed securities with a fair value of $1.7 billion as of
December 31, 2010, and $1.8 billion as of December 31, 2009.
The table below provides comparative data for securities sold under agreements to repurchase for the years
indicated:
2010
2009
2008
Average amount outstanding during the year (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Maximum amount outstanding at month-end (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance, December 31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rate, December 31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted average interest rate for the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$1,560,215
1,566,000
1,561,000
(Dollars in thousands)
$1,562,447
1,587,000
1,557,000
$1,554,023
1,610,000
1,610,000
4.18%
4.24%
4.19%
4.17%
3.95%
3.90%
(1) Average balances were computed using daily averages.
(2) Highest month-end balances were September 2010, February 2009, and December 2008.
Total advances from the FHLB San Francisco decreased $379.4 million to $550.0 million at December 31,
2010, from $929.4 million at December 31, 2009, primarily due to prepayments in 2010. As of December 31,
2010, all $550.0 million FHLB advances with weighted rate of 4.43% were puttable but the FHLB had not
exercised its right to terminate any of the puttable transactions. The FHLB has the right to terminate the puttable
transactions at par at each three-month anniversary after the first puttable date. In 2010, we prepaid
$379.4 million of FHLB advances with a weighted average rate of 4.62% and incurred prepayment penalties
totaling $14.3 million.
Long-term Debt
On September 29, 2006, the Bank issued $50.0 million in subordinated debt in a private placement
transaction. The debt has a maturity term of 10 years and bears interest at a rate of three-month LIBOR plus 110
basis points. As of December 31, 2010, $50.0 million was outstanding with a rate of 1.40% under this note
compared to $50.0 million at a rate of 1.35% at December 31, 2009. The subordinated debt qualifies as Tier 2
capital for regulatory reporting purpose and is included as a component of long-term debt in the consolidated
balance sheet.
We established three special purpose trusts in 2003 and two in 2007 for the purpose of issuing Guaranteed
Preferred Beneficial Interests in their Subordinated Debentures to outside investors (“Capital Securities”). The
proceeds from the issuance of the Capital Securities as well as our purchase of the common stock of the special
purpose trusts were invested in Junior Subordinated Notes of the Company (“Junior Subordinated Notes”). The
trusts exist for the purpose of issuing the Capital Securities and investing in Junior Subordinated Notes. Subject
to some limitations, payment of distributions out of the monies held by the trusts and payments on liquidation of
the trusts, or the redemption of the Capital Securities, are guaranteed by the Company to the extent the trusts
have funds on hand at such time. The obligations of the Company under the guarantees and the Junior
Subordinated Notes are subordinate and junior in right of payment to all indebtedness of the Company and will
be structurally subordinated to all liabilities and obligations of the Company’s subsidiaries. The Company has the
right to defer payments of interest on the Junior Subordinated Notes at any time or from time to time for a period
of up to twenty consecutive quarterly periods with respect to each deferral period. Under the terms of the Junior
Subordinated Notes, the Company may not, with certain exceptions, declare or pay any dividends or distributions
on its capital stock or purchase or acquire any of its capital stock if it has deferred payment of interest on any
Junior Subordinated Notes.
62
At December 31, 2010, Junior Subordinated Notes totaled $121.1 million with a weighted average interest
rate of 2.46% compared to $121.1 million with a weighted average rate of 2.41% at December 31, 2009. The
Junior Subordinated Notes have a stated maturity term of 30 years. The Junior Subordinated Notes issued qualify
as Tier 1 capital for regulatory reporting purposes. The trusts are not consolidated with the Company in
accordance with an accounting pronouncement that took effect in December 2003.
Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements, Commitments, Guarantees, and Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and commitments to make future payments as of
December 31, 2010. Payments for deposits and borrowings do not include interest. Payments related to leases are
based on actual payments specified in the underlying contracts. Loan commitments and standby letters of credit are
presented at contractual amounts; however, since many of these commitments are expected to expire unused or only
partially used, the total amounts of these commitments do not necessarily reflect future cash requirements.
Payment Due by Period
More than
1 year but
less than
3 years
3 years or
more but
less than
5 years
1 year
or less
5 years
or more
Total
(Dollars in thousands)
Contractual obligations:
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (1) . . . $ 111,000 $
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (2) . . .
Other borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deposits with stated maturity dates . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
5,824
—
5,764
4,059,152
50,000 $1,200,000 $200,000 $1,561,000
550,000
550,000
27,576
2,641
171,136
—
20,258
9,113
— 4,274,981
215,619
—
—
—
19,111
— 171,136
1,143
4,238
210
$4,181,740 $ 827,373 $1,204,448 $391,390 $6,604,951
Other commitments:
Commitments to extend credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Standby letters of credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial letters of credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bill of lading guarantees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
965,093
58,440
62,090
245
178,102
1,436
632
—
28,665
—
—
—
188,406
—
—
—
1,360,266
59,876
62,722
245
Total contractual obligations and other
commitments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $5,267,608 $1,007,543 $1,233,113 $579,796 $8,088,060
(1) These repurchase agreements have a final maturity of 5 years, 7 years and 10 years from origination date but
are callable on a quarterly basis after the six months or one year anniversary according to agreements.
(2) FHLB advances of $550.0 million that mature in 2012 are puttable on a quarterly basis as of December 31, 2010.
In the normal course of business, we enter into various transactions, which, in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles, are not included in our consolidated balance sheets. We enter into these
transactions to meet the financing needs of our customers. These transactions include commitments to extend
credit and standby letters of credit, which involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk and interest rate
risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets.
Loan Commitments. We enter into contractual commitments to extend credit, normally with fixed expiration
dates or termination clauses, at specified rates and for specific purposes. Substantially all of our commitments to
extend credit are contingent upon customers maintaining specific credit standards at the time of loan funding. We
minimize our exposure to loss under these commitments by subjecting them to credit approval and monitoring
procedures. Management assesses the credit risk associated with certain commitments to extend credit in
determining the level of the allowance for credit losses.
63
Standby Letters of Credit. Standby letters of credit are written conditional commitments issued by us to
secure the obligations of a customer to a third party. In the event the customer does not perform in accordance
with the terms of an agreement with the third party, we would be required to fund the commitment. The
maximum potential amount of future payments we could be required to make is represented by the contractual
amount of the commitment. If the commitment is funded, we would be entitled to seek reimbursement from the
customer. Our policies generally require that standby letter of credit arrangements contain security and debt
covenants similar to those contained in loan agreements.
Capital Resources
Stockholders’ Equity
We obtain capital primarily from retained earnings, the issuance of additional common stock and, to a lesser
extent, through our Dividend Reinvestment Plan and stock option exercises.
On February 1, 2010, the Company sold $132.3 million of new common stock consisting of 15,028,409
shares at an average price of $8.80 per share. Net of issuance costs and fees, this issuance added $124.9 million
to common stockholders’ equity. In September 2009, the Company issued $32.4 million of new common stock
consisting of 3,490,000 shares at an average price of $9.28 per share. Net of issuance costs and fees, this issuance
added $31.4 million to common stockholders’ equity. On October 13, 2009, the Company issued $81.0 million of
new common stock consisting of 8,756,756 shares at an average price of $9.25 per share. Net of issuance costs
and fees, this issuance added $76.0 million to common stockholders’ equity. From November 23, 2009 through
December 24, 2009, the Company issued $12.6 million of new common stock consisting of 1,623,100 shares at
an average price of $7.73 per share. Net of issuance costs and fees, this issuance added $12.0 million to common
stockholder’s equity. In December 2008, we obtained additional capital of $258.0 million by participating in the
U.S. Treasury Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”) Capital Purchase Program under the Emergency
Economic Stabilization Act of 2008.
Total equity of $1.44 billion at December 31, 2010, was up $123.4 million, or 9.4%, compared to
$1.31 billion at December 31, 2009. The increase in stockholders’ equity was due to a $12.2 million increase in
net income and from common stock issuances of $124.9 million, reinvestment of dividends of $310,000 and
amortization of unearned compensation of $3.3 million offset by payments of dividends on preferred stock of
$13.6 million, payments of dividends on common stock of $3.1 million, an increase of $146,000 in unrealized
losses on securities, a tax short-fall of $539,000 mainly from the expiration of stock options. The Company paid
common stock cash dividends of $0.04 per common share in 2010 and $0.205 per common share in 2009.
We have participated in the U.S. Treasury TARP Capital Purchase Program under the Emergency Economic
Stabilization Act of 2008. Pursuant to this program, on December 5, 2008, the U.S. Treasury purchased 258,000
shares of our Series B Preferred Stock in the amount of $258.0 million. The Series B Preferred Stock pays
cumulative compounding dividends at a rate of 5% per year for the first five years, and thereafter at a rate of
9% per year. The shares are non-voting, other than class voting rights on matters that could adversely affect the
shares. They are callable at par after three years. Prior to the end of three years, the senior preferred shares may
only be redeemed with the proceeds from one or more qualified equity offerings. In conjunction with the
purchase of senior preferred shares, the U.S. Treasury received warrants to purchase 1,846,374 shares of
common stock at the exercise price of $20.96 with an aggregate market price equal to $38.7 million, 15% of the
senior preferred stock amount that U.S. Treasury invested. The exercise price of $20.96 was calculated based on
the average of closing prices of our common stock on the 20 trading days ending on the last trading day prior to
November 17, 2008, the date that we received the preliminary approval for the capital purchase from the U.S.
Treasury. The Company also adopted the U.S. Treasury’s standards for executive compensation and corporate
governance for the period during which the U.S. Treasury holds securities issued under this program. See Part I
— Item 1A — “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of some of the factors that
may affect us.
64
As of December 31, 2010, we remained authorized to purchase up to 622,500 shares of our common stock
under our November 2007 stock repurchase program. No shares were repurchased during the three years from
2008 to 2010. As long as the U. S. Treasury owns any of our Series B Preferred Stock, we are precluded from
any repurchase of our common stock. As discussed below under “Capital Resources — Regulatory Matters,” we
are also subject to other restrictions on the repurchase of our common stock.
Capital Adequacy
Management seeks to retain our capital at a level sufficient to support future growth, protect depositors and
stockholders, and comply with various regulatory requirements. The primary measure of capital adequacy is
based on the ratio of risk-based capital to risk-weighted assets. At December 31, 2010, Tier 1 risk-based capital
ratio of 15.37%, total risk-based capital ratio of 17.27%, and Tier 1 leverage capital ratio of 11.44%, continued to
place the Company in the “well capitalized” category, which is defined as institutions with Tier 1 risk-based
capital ratio equal to or greater than 6.00%, total risk-based capital ratio equal to or greater than 10.00%, and
Tier 1 leverage capital ratio equal to or greater than 5.00%. The comparable ratios for 2009 were Tier 1 risk-
based capital ratio of 13.55%, total risk-based capital ratio of 15.43%, and Tier 1 leverage capital ratio of 9.64%.
Cathay Real Estate Investment Trust, of which 100% of the common stock is owned by the Bank, sold
$4.4 million during 2003 and $4.2 million during 2004 of its 7.0% Series A Non-Cumulative preferred stock to
accredited investors. During 2005, the Trust repurchased $131,000 of its preferred stock. This preferred stock
qualifies as Tier 1 capital under current regulatory guidelines.
A table displaying the Bancorp’s and the Bank’s capital and leverage ratios at December 31, 2010 and 2009
is included in Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Dividend Policy
Holders of common stock are entitled to dividends as and when declared by our board of directors out of
funds legally available for the payment of dividends. Although we have historically paid cash dividends on our
common stock, we are not required to do so. Commencing with the second quarter of 2009, our board of
directors reduced our common stock dividend to $.08 per share and $.01 per share thereafter. In January 2010,
we adopted a capital management and dividend policy as part of our Three-Year Capital and Strategic Plan which
included a policy to refrain from paying dividends in excess of $.01 per share per quarter, except when covered
by operating earnings. On November 17, 2010, the Federal Reserve issued guidance that bank holding companies
with U. S. Government investments still outstanding should not increase dividend payouts. The amount of future
dividends will depend on earnings, financial condition, approval by our regulators, the repayment of our Series B
Preferred Stock, capital requirements, and other factors, and will be determined by our Board of Directors in
accordance with the capital management and dividend policy.
Substantially all of the revenues of the Company available for payment of dividends derive from amounts
paid to it by the Bank. The terms of the Bank Subordinated Securities limit the ability of the Bank to pay
dividends to us if the Bank is not current in paying interest on the Bank Subordinated Securities or another event
of default has occurred. As further discussed under “Regulatory Matters,” the Bank is subject to a restriction on
dividends it may pay to the Bancorp under a memorandum of understanding with the DFI and the FDIC. Under
the memorandum of understanding we entered into with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (FRB SF),
we agreed that we will not, without the FRB SF’s prior written approval, receive any dividends or any other form
of payment or distribution representing a reduction of capital from the Bank. In our Three-Year Capital and
Strategic Plan, we indicated the Bank will not pay a dividend to us in 2010.
The terms of our Series B Preferred Stock and Junior Subordinated Securities also limit our ability to pay
dividends on our common stock. If we are not current in our payment of dividends on our Series B Preferred
Stock or in our payment of interest on our Junior Subordinated Securities, we may not pay dividends on our
65
common stock. The Federal Reserve Board has previously issued Federal Reserve Supervision and Regulation
Letter SR-09-4 that states that bank holding companies are expected to inform and consult with Federal Reserve
supervisory staff prior to declaring and paying a dividend that exceeds earnings for the period for which the
dividend is being paid. As a result of losses incurred in 2009, we were expected to so inform and consult with the
Federal Reserve supervisory staff prior to declaring or paying any dividends and we have agreed under the
memorandum of understanding with the FRB SF that we will not, without the FRB SF’s prior written approval,
declare or pay any dividends, make any payments on trust preferred securities, or make any other capital
distributions. There can be no assurance that our regulators will approve the payment of such dividends.
Under California State banking law, the Bank may not without regulatory approval pay a cash dividend
which exceeds the lesser of the Bank’s retained earnings or its net income for the last three fiscal years, less any
cash distributions made during that period. Under this regulation, as of January 1, 2011, the Bank does not have
any capacity to pay dividends to the Company without regulatory approval.
Regulatory Matters
On December 17, 2009, the Bancorp entered into a memorandum of understanding with the Federal Reserve
Bank of San Francisco (FRB SF) under which we agreed that we will not, without the FRB SF’s prior written
approval, (i) receive any dividends or any other form of payment or distribution representing a reduction of
capital from the Bank, or (ii) declare or pay any dividends, make any payments on trust preferred securities, or
make any other capital distributions. We do not believe that this agreement regarding dividends from the Bank
will have a material adverse effect on our operations. We had retained a portion of the proceeds from our
common stock offerings to be used, for among other things, payments of future dividends on our common and
preferred stock and payments on trust preferred securities. At December 31, 2010, our cash on hand totaled
$37.3 million which is sufficient to cover future dividends on our common stock at the current quarterly rate of
$.01 per share, on our preferred stock, and payments on our trust preferred securities, subject to FRB SF
approval, for at least two years.
Under the memorandum, we also agreed to submit to the FRB SF for review and approval a plan to maintain
sufficient capital at the Company on a consolidated basis and at the Bank, a dividend policy for the Bancorp, a
plan to improve management of our liquidity position and funds management practices, and a liquidity policy
and contingency funding plan for the Bancorp. As part of our compliance with the memorandum, on January 22,
2010, we submitted to the FRB SF a Three-Year Capital and Strategic Plan that updates a previously submitted
plan and establishes, among other things, targets for our Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio, total risk-based capital
ratio, Tier 1 leverage capital ratio and tangible common risk-based ratio, each of which, where applicable, are
above the minimum requirements for a well-capitalized institution. In addition, we agreed to notify the FRB SF
prior to effecting certain changes to our senior executive officers and board of directors and we are limited and/or
prohibited, in certain circumstances, in our ability to enter into contracts to pay and to make golden parachute
severance and indemnification payments. We also agreed in the memorandum that we will not, without the prior
written approval of the FRB SF, directly or indirectly, (i) incur, renew, increase or guaranty any debt, (ii) issue
any trust preferred securities, or (iii) purchase, redeem, or otherwise acquire any of our stock. The target, actual,
and any excess or deficiency capital levels of the Three-Year Capital and Strategic Plan submitted to the FRB SF
are as follows as of December 31, 2010:
Tier 1 risk-based
capital ratio
Total risk-based
capital ratio
Tier 1 leverage
capital ratio
Tangible common
risk-based ratio *
Actual . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Target Levels . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Excess . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
15.37%
11.50%
3.87%
17.27%
13.50%
3.77%
11.44%
9.50%
1.94%
10.65%
5.00%
5.65%
*
Tier 1 risk-based capital excluding preferred stock, trust preferred stock and REIT preferred stock divided
by total risk-weighted assets.
66
On March 1, 2010, the Bank entered into a memorandum of understanding with the Department of Financial
Institutions (DFI) and the FDIC pursuant to which we are required to develop and implement, within specified
time periods, plans satisfactory to the DFI and the FDIC to reduce commercial real estate concentrations, to
enhance and to improve the quality of our stress testing of the Bank’s loan portfolio, and to revise our loan policy
in connection therewith; to develop and adopt a strategic plan addressing improved profitability and capital ratios
and to reduce the Bank’s overall risk profile; to develop and adopt a capital plan; to develop and implement a
plan to improve asset quality, including the methodology for calculating the loss reserve allocation and
evaluating its adequacy; and to develop and implement a plan to reduce dependence on wholesale funding. In
addition, we are required to report our progress to the DFI and FDIC on a quarterly basis. As part of our
compliance with the Bank memorandum, on April 30, 2010, we submitted to the DFI and the FDIC a Three-Year
Capital Plan that updated the Three-Year Capital and Strategic Plan previously submitted to the FRB SF on
January 22, 2010, and established, among other things, targets for our Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio and total
risk-based capital ratio, each of which are above the minimum requirements for a well-capitalized institution and
effective June 30, 2010, a target Tier 1 to total tangible assets ratio. At December 31, 2010, we are in compliance
with the applicable target ratios. The target, actual, and any excess or deficiency capital levels of the Three-Year
Capital Plan submitted to the DFI and FDIC are as follows as of December 31, 2010:
Actual . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Target Levels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Excess . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
14.81%
11.50%
3.31%
16.71%
13.50%
3.21%
11.30%
9.50%
1.80%
Tier 1 risk-based
capital ratio
Total risk-based
capital ratio
Tier 1 Capital to total
tangible assets ratio
Under the memorandum of understanding with the DFI and the FDIC, we are also subject to a restriction on
dividends from the Bank to the Bancorp, a requirement to maintain adequate allowance for loan and lease losses,
and restrictions on any new branches and business lines without prior approval. We are currently required to
notify the FDIC prior to effecting certain changes to our senior executive officers and board of directors and are
limited and/or prohibited, in certain circumstances, in our ability to enter into contracts to pay and to make
golden parachute severance and indemnification payments; and we are required to retain management and
directors acceptable to the DFI and the FDIC. Following discussions with regulators, the Board of the Bank
established a Compliance Committee to, among other things, review the Company’s management and
governance and to make recommendations based on such review.
The Bancorp and the Bank have taken appropriate steps to comply with the terms of their respective
memorandums of understanding and we believe we are in compliance with the memorandums except that the
Company will make certain process improvements to its Capital Plan based on input from the FRB SF. In
particular, on January 21, 2010 the Board of Directors of the Bank appointed the Compliance Committee to
review the Company’s management and governance and to make recommendations based on such review and, on
February 18, 2010, appointed the Company’s Audit Committee to oversee the implementation of the two
memoranda. On February 1, 2010, net of issuance costs and fees, we raised $124.9 million in new capital through
a public offering of common stock; see the section “Capital Resources—Stockholder’s Equity” above. We do not
believe that the memoranda or our compliance activities will have a material adverse effect on our operations or
financial condition, including liquidity. If we fail to comply with the terms of the memoranda, that failure could
lead to additional enforcement action by regulators that could have a material adverse effect on our operations or
financial condition.
Risk Elements of the Loan Portfolio
Non-performing Assets
Non-performing assets include loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest, non-accrual loans,
and OREO. Our policy is to place loans on non-accrual status if interest and principal or either interest or
principal is past due 90 days or more, or in cases where management deems the full collection of principal and
67
interest unlikely. After a loan is placed on non-accrual status, any previously accrued but unpaid interest is
reversed and charged against current income and subsequent payments received are generally first applied
towards the outstanding principal balance of the loan. Depending on the circumstances, management may elect to
continue the accrual of interest on certain past due loans if partial payment is received and/or the loan is well
collateralized and in the process of collection. The loan is generally returned to accrual status when the borrower
has brought the past due principal and interest payments current and, in the opinion of management, the borrower
has demonstrated the ability to make future payments of principal and interest as scheduled.
Management reviews the loan portfolio regularly for problem loans. During the ordinary course of business,
management becomes aware of borrowers that may not be able to meet the contractual requirements of the loan
agreements. Such loans are placed under closer supervision with consideration given to placing the loan on non-accrual
status, the need for an additional allowance for loan losses, and (if appropriate) partial or full charge-off.
Total non-performing portfolio assets, excluding non-accrual loans held for sale, decreased $26.6 million, or
7.6%, to $325.1 million at December 31, 2010, compared with $351.7 million at December 31, 2009, primarily
due to a $38.3 million decrease in non-accrual loans offset by a $6.7 million increase in OREO and by a
$5.0 million increase in accruing loans past due 90 days or more.
As a percentage of gross loans, excluding loans held for sale, plus OREO, our non-performing assets
decreased to 4.68% at December 31, 2010, from 5.05% at December 31, 2009. The non-performing portfolio
loan coverage ratio, defined as the allowance for credit losses to non-performing loans, increased to 100.1% at
December 31, 2010, from 77.36% at December 31, 2009.
The following table presents the breakdown of total non-accrual, past due, and restructured loans for the
past five years:
Non-accrual, Past Due and Restructured Loans
December 31,
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
(Dollars in thousands)
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-accrual loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
5,006
242,319
$ — $
280,643
6,733
181,202
$ 9,265
58,275
$ 8,008
22,322
Total non-performing loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
247,325
280,643
187,935
67,540
30,330
Real estate acquired in foreclosure and other assets . . . .
77,740
71,014
63,892
16,147
5,259
Total non-performing assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$325,065
$351,657
$251,827
$83,687
$35,589
Accruing troubled debt restructurings (TDRs)
. . . . . . . .
Non-accrual TDRs (included in non-accrual loans) . . . . .
Non-accrual loans held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-performing assets as a percentage of gross loans
$136,800
$ 28,146
2,873
$
$ 54,992
$ 41,609
$ 54,826
$
955
$12,601
$
924
$ 11,614
$ 3,504
$ 1,665
$ — $ — $ —
and other real estate owned at year-end . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.68%
5.05%
3.34%
1.25%
0.62%
Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of gross
loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.60%
3.15%
1.73%
1.04%
1.13%
Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of non-
performing loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
100.10%
77.36%
68.87% 102.99% 213.28%
68
The effect of non-accrual loans on interest income for the past five years is presented below:
Non-accrual Loans
Contractual interest due . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest recognized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$17,304
4,853
$23,746
9,830
$14,043
8,782
$5,324
2,756
$1,851
851
Net interest foregone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$12,451
$13,916
$ 5,261
$2,568
$1,000
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
(In thousands)
As of December 31, 2010, there were no commitments to lend additional funds to those borrowers whose
loans had been restructured, were considered impaired, or were on non-accrual status.
Non-accrual Loans
At December 31, 2010, total non-accrual portfolio loans of $242.3 million decreased $38.3 million, or
13.7%, from $280.6 million at December 31, 2009. The allowance for the collateral-dependent impaired loans is
calculated by the difference between the outstanding loan balance and the value of the collateral as determined
by recent appraisals, sales contract, or other available market price information. The allowance for collateral-
dependent impaired loans varies from loan to loan based on the collateral coverage of the loan at the time of
designation as non-performing. We continue to monitor the collateral coverage, based on recent appraisals, on
these loans on a quarterly basis and adjust the allowance accordingly.
Non-accrual portfolio loans were $242.3 million at December 31, 2010, and consisted of four residential
construction loans totaling $25.2 million, 10 non-farm non-residential construction loans totaling $28.7 million,
51 commercial real estate loans totaling $122.7 million, 13 land loans totaling $21.9 million, 36 commercial
loans totaling $31.5 million, and 47 residential mortgage loans totaling $12.3 million. Non-accrual loans also
include those troubled debt restructurings that do not qualify for accrual status. The comparable numbers for
2009 were 13 residential construction loans totaling $54.5 million, nine non-farm non-residential construction
loans totaling $36.8 million, 47 commercial real estate loans totaling $112.8 million, 20 land loans totaling
$40.5 million, 40 commercial loans totaling $26.6 million, and 36 residential mortgage loans totaling
$9.5 million.
At December 31, 2010, non-accrual loans held for sale of $2.9 million decreased $51.9 million from
$54.8 million at December 31, 2009. In 2010, we sold six held for sale loans of $31.7 million with recorded gains
of $779,000, transferred seven loans of $21.5 million to OREO, wrote down $2.9 million loans held for sale
based on their appraisal value, and added four new loans of $4.3 million which were sold subsequently. At
December 31, 2009, loans held for sale were comprised of $17.1 million for two residential construction loans,
$11.7 million for seven commercial real estate loans, and $26.0 million for a commercial real estate loan which
was sold on December 30, 2009. The sale of the $26.0 million commercial real estate loan was recognized for
financial reporting purposes during the first quarter of 2010 when the cash portion of the purchase price was
received. Total charge-offs of $19.3 million were recorded during the fourth quarter of 2009 upon the transfer of
loans to held for sale. During the fourth quarter of 2009, eight loans were sold for $22.0 million.
69
The following tables present the type of properties securing the non-accrual portfolio loans and the type of
businesses the borrowers engaged in as of the dates indicated:
December 31, 2010
December 31, 2009
Real
Estate (1)
Commercial
Real
Estate (1)
Commercial
(In thousands)
Type of Collateral
Single/Multi-family residence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Personal Property (UCC) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unsecured . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 50,341
138,557
21,923
—
—
$ 7,665
—
—
23,833
—
$ 69,408
159,031
25,634
—
—
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$210,821
$31,498
$254,073
$ 6,305
1,076
—
18,063
1,126
$26,570
(1) Real estate includes commercial mortgage loans, real estate construction loans, and residential mortgage
loans and equity lines.
December 31, 2010
December 31, 2009
Real
Estate (1)
Commercial
Real
Estate (1)
Commercial
(In thousands)
Type of Business
Real estate development
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Wholesale/Retail . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Food/Restaurant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$183,637
16,599
277
10,308
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$210,821
$ 2,234
28,864
400
—
$31,498
$182,512
62,082
849
8,630
$254,073
$
664
25,568
338
—
$26,570
(1) Real estate includes commercial mortgage loans, real estate construction loans, and residential mortgage
loans and equity lines.
Other Real Estate Owned
At December 31, 2010, the net carrying value of OREO increased $6.7 million, or 9.5%, to $77.7 million
from $71.0 million at December 31, 2009. OREO located in California was $55.9 million and was comprised
primarily of seven parcels of land zoned for residential purpose of $14.3 million, six parcels of land zoned for
commercial purpose of $8.1 million, two commercial building construction projects of $4.8 million, three
residential construction projects of $9.7 million, eleven office and commercial use buildings of $18.4 million,
and three single family residential properties of $605,000. OREO located in Texas was $12.9 million and was
comprised of two residential construction projects of $3.7 million, two commercial use buildings construction
projects of $1.9 million, two parcels of land zoned for residential purpose of $3.6 million, two multi-family
residences of $1.7 million, one parcel of land zoned for commercial purpose of $906,000, three single family
residential properties of $786,000, and an industrial building of $291,000. OREO located in the state of
Washington was $4.3 million and was comprised of two residential construction projects of $1.8 million, one
parcel of land zoned for residential purpose of $1.3 million, a commercial building construction project of
$949,000, and a single family residence of $241,000. OREO located in the state of Nevada was a parcel of land
zoned for residential purpose of $3.3 million. OREO in all other states was $1.3 million and was comprised
primarily of three commercial use properties.
For 2009, OREO located in California was $51.6 million and was comprised primarily of six parcels of land
zoned for residential purpose of $17.9 million, three office and commercial use buildings construction projects of
70
$11.0 million, six office and commercial use buildings of $7.1 million, four retail shopping centers of
$6.3 million, eight single family residential properties of $5.0 million, three multi-family residential properties of
$2.7 million, a multi-family residential construction project of $1.4 million, and a restaurant of $209,000. OREO
located in Texas was comprised of twelve properties, including two multi-family residences of $5.7 million, three
office and commercial use buildings of $4.5 million, two retail stores and shopping centers of $1.2 million, and
four single family residential properties of $1.4 million. OREO located in the state of Washington was
$4.3 million and in all other states was $2.4 million.
Troubled Debt Restructurings
A troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) is a formal modification of the terms of a loan when the Bank, for
economic or legal reasons related to the borrower’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to the borrower.
The concessions may be granted in various forms, including reduction in the stated interest rate, reduction in the
amount of principal amortization, forgiveness of a portion of a loan balance or accrued interest, or extension of
the maturity date. Although these loan modifications are considered under ASC Subtopic 310-40, formerly SFAS
15, to be troubled debt restructurings, the loans have, pursuant to the Bank’s policy, performed under the
restructured terms and have demonstrated sustained performance under the modified terms for six months before
being returned to accrual status. The sustained performance considered by management pursuant to its policy
includes the periods prior to the modification if the prior performance met or exceeded the modified terms. This
would include cash paid by the borrower prior to the restructure to set up interest reserves.
Troubled debt restructurings on accrual status totaled $136.8 million at December 31, 2010, and were
comprised of 28 loans, an increase of $81.8 million, compared to 14 loans totaling $55.0 million at December 31,
2009. TDRs at December 31, 2010, were comprised of eight retail shopping and commercial use buildings of
$64.4 million, six office and commercial use buildings of $20.8 million, three multi-family residential loans of
$21.4 million, two hotel loans of $15.4 million, four single family residential loan of $10.5 million, three land
loans of $2.5 million, and two commercial loans of $1.8 million. We expect that the troubled debt restructuring
loans on accruing status as of December 31, 2010, which are all performing in accordance with their restructured
terms, will continue to comply with the restructured terms because of the reduced principal or interest payments
on these loans. The average rate on commercial real estate TDRs was 4.75% compared to 5.83% earned on the
entire commercial real estate portfolio in the fourth quarter of 2010. The comparable TDRs at December 31,
2009, were comprised of four office and commercial use buildings of $28.3 million, three multi-family
residential loans of $11.6 million, a hotel loan of $10.3 million, two land loans of $2.3 million, three shopping
center loans of $2.1 million, and a single family residential loan of $485,000.
A summary of TDRs by type of loans and by accrual/non-accrual status is shown below:
December 31, 2010
Principal
Deferral
Rate
Reduction
Rate Reduction
and Forgiveness
of Principal
Rate Reduction
and Payment
Deferral
Total
(In thousands)
Accruing TDRs
Commercial loans .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial mortgage loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Residential mortgage loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 1,131
17,338
2,658
$ 1,780
87,411
599
Total accruing TDRs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$21,127
$89,790
$ —
3,459
—
$3,459
$ 1,114
20,831
479
$22,424
$
4,025
129,039
3,736
$136,800
71
December 31, 2010
Interest
Deferral
Principal
Deferral
Rate
Reduction
Rate Reduction
and Payment
Deferral
Total
(In thousands)
Non-accrual TDRs
Commercial mortgage loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Residential mortgage loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$1,239
340
$21,156
1,037
$2,310
—
Total non-accrual TDRs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$1,579
$22,193
$2,310
$1,113
951
$2,064
$25,818
2,328
$28,146
December 31, 2009
Interest
Deferral
Principal
Deferral
Rate
Reduction
Rate Reduction
and Forgiveness
of Principal
Total
(In thousands)
Accruing TDRs
Commercial mortgage loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Residential mortgage loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$8,864
—
$34,231
485
Total accruing TDRs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$8,864
$34,716
$863
—
$863
$10,549
—
$10,549
$54,507
485
$54,992
December 31, 2009
Interest
Deferral
Principal
Deferral
Rate
Reduction
Rate Reduction
and Payment
Deferral
Total
(In thousands)
Non-accrual TDRs
Commercial mortgage loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$5,764
$9,322
$8,886
Total non-accrual TDRs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$5,764
$9,322
$8,886
$17,637
$17,637
$41,609
$41,609
Impaired Loans
A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that a creditor will be unable to collect all amounts due
according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement based on current circumstances and events. The
assessment for impairment occurs when and while such loans are on non-accrual as a result of delinquency status
of over 90 days or receipt of information indicating that full collection of principal is doubtful, or when the loan
has been restructured in a troubled debt restructuring. Those loans with a balance less than our defined selection
criteria, generally a loan amount is $500,000 or less, are treated as a homogeneous portfolio. If loans meeting the
defined criteria are not collateral dependent, we measure the impairment based on the present value of the
expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate. If loans meeting the defined criteria are
collateral dependent, we measure the impairment by using the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of
the collateral. We obtain an appraisal to determine the amount of impairment at the date that the loan becomes
impaired. The appraisals are based on “as is” or bulk sale valuations. To ensure that appraised values remain
current, we generally obtain an updated appraisal every six months from qualified independent appraisers.
Furthermore, if the most current appraisal is dated more than three months prior to the effective date of the
impairment test, we validate the most current value with third party market data appropriate to the location and
property type of the collateral. If the third party market data indicates that the value of our collateral property
values has declined since the most recent valuation date, we adjust downward the value of the property to reflect
current market conditions. If the fair value of the collateral is less than the recorded amount of the loan, we then
recognize impairment by creating or adjusting an existing valuation allowance with a corresponding charge to the
provision for loan losses. If an impaired loan is expected to be collected through liquidation of the collateral, the
amount of impairment, excluding disposal costs, which range between 5% to 10% of the fair value, depending on
the size of impaired loan, is charged off against the allowance for loan losses. Non-accrual impaired loans are not
returned to accruing status unless the unpaid interest has been brought current and full repayment of the recorded
72
balance is expected or if the borrower has made six consecutive monthly payments of the scheduled amounts
due, and are continued to be reviewed for continued impairment until they are no longer reported as troubled debt
restructurings.
We identified impaired loans with a recorded investment of $382.0 million at December 31, 2010, compared
to $390.5 million at December 31, 2009. The average balance of impaired loans was $370.6 million in 2010 and
$359.6 million in 2009. We considered all non-accrual loans to be impaired. Interest recognized on impaired
loans totaled $10.0 million in 2010 and $11.1 million in 2009. As of December 31, 2010, $210.8 million, or
87.0%, of the $242.3 million of non-accrual portfolio loans was secured by real estate. As of December 31, 2009,
$254.1 million, or 90.5%, of the $280.6 million of non-accrual loans was secured by real estate. In light of
declining property values in the current economic downturn affecting the real estate markets, the Bank has
obtained current appraisals, sales contract, or other available market price information which provides updated
factors in evaluating potential loss.
At December 31, 2010, $15.2 million of the $245.2 million allowance for loan losses was allocated for
impaired loans and $230 million was allocated to the general allowance. At December 31, 2009, $15.1 million of
the $211.9 million allowance for loan losses was allocated for impaired loans and $196.8 million was allocated to
the general allowance. The amount of the allowance for loan losses allocated to impaired loans in 2010 remained
essentially the same as in 2009. The remainder of the allowance for loan losses is a general allowance and
increased during 2010 as a result of the increased weighting in the migration analysis to losses during the most
recent two years, the increase in the number of segments for commercial real estate loans from one to ten and an
increase in the environmental factor for purchased syndicated loans described in “Allowance for Credit Losses”
below. In 2010, net loan charge-offs were $126.4 million, or 1.83%, of average loans compared to
$219.3 million, or 3.02%, of average loans in 2009.
The allowance for credit losses to non-accrual loans increased to 102.2% at December 31, 2010, from
77.4% at December 31, 2009. Non-accrual loans also include those troubled debt restructurings that do not
qualify for accrual status.
The following table presents impaired loans and the related allowance and charge-off as of the dates indicated:
Impaired Loans
At December 31, 2010
At December 31, 2009
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
Recorded
Investment Allowance
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
Recorded
Investment Allowance
(Dollars in thousands)
$ 41,233
102,186
211,717
$ 27,775
64,274
156,305
$ — $ 21,860
42,913
207,655
—
—
$ 14,712
31,805
186,638
$ —
—
—
With no allocated allowance
Commercial loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Real estate construction loans . . . . . .
Commercial mortgage loans . . . . . . . .
Residential mortgage and equity
lines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7,823
7,436
—
5,251
5,110
—
Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $362,959
$255,790
$ — $277,679
$238,265
$ —
With allocated allowance
Commercial loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Real estate construction loans . . . . . .
Commercial mortgage loans . . . . . . . .
Residential mortgage and equity
$ 13,930
15,429
98,593
$
7,748
13,416
96,449
$ 2,925
7,470
3,812
$ 33,503
101,195
72,893
$ 24,055
76,583
46,705
$ 6,557
4,649
3,506
lines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9,811
Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $137,763
Total impaired loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $500,722
8,589
$126,202
978
$15,185
6,397
$213,988
4,853
$152,196
421
$15,133
$381,992
$15,185
$491,667
$390,461
$15,133
73
Loan Interest Reserves
In accordance with customary banking practice, construction loans and land development loans are
originated where interest on the loan is disbursed from pre-established interest reserves included in the total
original loan commitment. Our construction and land development loans generally include optional renewal
terms after the maturity of the initial loan term. New appraisals are obtained prior to extension or renewal of
these loans in part to determine the appropriate interest reserve to be established for the new loan term. Loans
with interest reserves are underwritten to the same criteria, including loan to value and if applicable, pro forma
debt service coverage ratios, as loans without interest reserves. Construction loans with interest reserves are
monitored on a periodic basis to gauge progress towards completion. Interest reserves are frozen if it is
determined that additional draws would result in a loan to value ratio that exceeds policy maximums based on
collateral property type. Our policy limits in this regard are consistent with supervisory limits and range from
65% in the case of land to 85% in the case of 1- to 4-family residential construction projects.
The following table presents the summary of loans with interest reserves:
Remaining
Interest
Reserves
Loans
Extended
Balance
(Dollars in thousands)
At December 31, 2010
Construction loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Land loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$101,926
—
$ 4,466
—
$ 63,613
—
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$101,926
$ 4,466
$ 63,613
At December 31, 2009
Construction loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Land loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$325,689
11,752
$29,121
591
$136,483
3,722
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$337,441
$29,712
$140,205
In 2010, the Bank had no loans on non-accrual status with available interest reserves. At December 31,
2010, $25.3 million of non-accrual residential construction loans, $28.9 million of non-accrual non-residential
construction loans, and $11.3 million of non-accrual land loans had been originated with pre-established interest
reserves. At December 31, 2009, $54.4 million of non-accrual residential construction loans, $37.0 million of
non-accrual non-residential construction loans, and $20.9 million of non-accrual land loans had been originated
with pre-established interest reserves.
While loans with interest reserves are typically expected to be repaid in full according to the original
contractual terms, some loans require one or more extensions beyond the original maturity. Typically, these
extensions are required due to construction delays, delays in sales or lease of property, or some combination of
these two factors.
Loan Concentration
Most of our business activity is with customers located in the predominantly Asian areas of California; New
York City; Dallas and Houston, Texas; Seattle, Washington; Boston, Massachusetts; Chicago, Illinois; and New
Jersey. We have no specific industry concentration, and generally our loans are collateralized with real property
or other pledged collateral. Loans are generally expected to be paid off from the operating profits of the
borrowers, refinancing by another lender, or through sale by the borrowers of the secured collateral. We
experienced no loan concentrations to multiple borrowers in similar activities that exceeded 10% of total loans as
of December 31, 2010.
74
The Federal banking regulatory agencies issued final guidance on December 6, 2006, regarding risk
management practices for financial institutions with high or increasing concentrations of commercial real estate
(“CRE”) loans on their balance sheets. The regulatory guidance reiterates the need for sound internal risk
management practices for those institutions that have experienced rapid growth in CRE lending, have notable
exposure to specific types of CRE, or are approaching or exceeding the supervisory criteria used to evaluate the
CRE concentration risk, but the guidance is not to be construed as a limit for CRE exposure. The supervisory
criteria are: (1) total reported loans for construction, land development, and other land represent 100% of the
institution’s total risk-based capital, and (2) both total CRE loans represent 300% or more of the institution’s
total risk-based capital and the institution’s CRE loan portfolio has increased 50% or more within the last thirty-
six months. In January 2010, the Bank reduced its internal limit for CRE loans from 400% of total capital to
300% of total capital to be achieved no later than December 2011. Total loans for construction, land
development, and other land represented 40% as of December 31, 2010, and 68% of total risk-based capital as of
December 31, 2009. Total CRE loans represented 285% as of December 31, 2010, and 332% of total risk-based
capital as of December 31, 2009. See Part I — Item 1A — “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
for a discussion of some of the factors that may affect us.
Allowance for Credit Losses
The Bank maintains the allowance for credit losses at a level that is considered adequate to cover the
estimated and known inherent risks in the loan portfolio and off-balance sheet unfunded credit commitments.
Allowance for credit losses is comprised of allowances for loan losses and for off-balance sheet unfunded credit
commitments. With this risk management objective, the Bank’s management has an established monitoring
system that is designed to identify impaired and potential problem loans, and to permit periodic evaluation of
impairment and the adequacy level of the allowance for credit losses in a timely manner.
In addition, the Board of Directors of the Bank has established a written credit policy that includes a credit
review and control system which it believes should be effective in ensuring that the Bank maintains an adequate
allowance for credit losses. The Board of Directors provides oversight for the allowance evaluation process,
including quarterly evaluations, and determines whether the allowance is adequate to absorb losses in the credit
portfolio. The determination of the amount of the allowance for credit losses and the provision for credit losses is
based on management’s current judgment about the credit quality of the loan portfolio and takes into
consideration known relevant internal and external factors that affect collectibility when determining the
appropriate level for the allowance for credit losses. The nature of the process by which the Bank determines the
appropriate allowance for credit losses requires the exercise of considerable judgment. Additions to the
allowance for credit losses are made by charges to the provision for credit losses. Identified credit exposures that
are determined to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance for credit losses. Recoveries of previously
charged off amounts, if any, are credited to the allowance for credit losses. A weakening of the economy or other
factors that adversely affect asset quality has resulted in an increase in the number of delinquencies,
bankruptcies, and defaults, and a higher level of non-performing assets, net charge-offs, and provision for loan
losses in the current period. See Part I — Item 1A — “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for
additional factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from forward-looking statements or
historical performance.
The allowance for loan losses was $245.2 million and the allowance for off-balance sheet unfunded credit
commitments was $2.3 million at December 31, 2010, and represented the amount that the Company believes to be
sufficient to absorb credit losses inherent in the Company’s loan portfolio including unfunded commitments. The
allowance for credit losses, the sum of allowance for loan losses and for off-balance sheet unfunded credit
commitments, was $247.6 million at December 31, 2010, compared to $217.1 million at December 31, 2009, an
increase of $30.5 million, or 14.0%. The allowance for credit losses represented 3.60% of period-end gross loans,
excluding loans held for sale, and 100.1% of non-performing portfolio loans at December 31, 2010. The comparable
ratios were 3.15% of period-end gross loans and 77.4% of non-performing loans at December 31, 2009.
75
The following table sets forth the information relating to the allowance for loan losses, charge-offs, recoveries,
and the reserve for off-balance sheet credit commitments for the past five years:
Allowance for Credit Losses
Amount Outstanding as of December 31,
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
(Dollars in thousands)
Allowance for Loan Losses
Balance at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 211,889 $ 122,093 $
Provision for credit losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reversal of/(transfer to) reserve for off-balance
307,000
156,900
64,983 $
106,700
60,220 $
11,000
56,438
2,000
sheet credit commitments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2,870
2,125
(2,756)
(107)
(656)
Charge-offs:
Commercial loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction loans-residential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction loans-other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Real estate loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Real estate land loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Installment loans and other loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(21,609)
(14,889)
(30,432)
(47,765)
(24,060)
—
(59,370)
(71,147)
(22,128)
(52,931)
(16,967)
(4)
(12,932)
(20,653)
—
(5,291)
(9,553)
(254)
(7,503)
(978)
—
(903)
(667)
(23)
(1,985)
—
—
(3)
—
(42)
Total charge-offs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(138,755)
(222,547)
(48,683)
(10,074)
(2,030)
Recoveries:
Commercial loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction loans-residential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction loans-other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Real estate loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Real estate-land loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Installment loans and other loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total recoveries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Allowance from acquisitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4,712
5,448
553
933
668
13
12,327
—
904
1,140
—
461
692
21
3,218
—
1,750
83
—
—
16
1,849
—
3,025
190
265
—
32
3,512
432
1,243
—
41
—
31
1,315
3,153
Balance at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 245,231 $ 211,889 $ 122,093 $
64,983 $
60,220
Reserve for off-balance sheet credit commitments
Balance at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Provision (reversal)/transfers for credit losses . . . . . .
5,207 $
(2,870)
7,332 $
(2,125)
4,576 $
2,756
4,469 $
107
Balance at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
2,337 $
5,207 $
7,332 $
4,576 $
3,813
656
4,469
Average loans outstanding during year ended (1) . . . $6,879,457 $7,262,831 $7,214,689 $6,170,505 $5,310,564
Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans outstanding
during the year (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.84%
3.02%
0.11%
0.65%
0.01%
Provision for credit losses to average loans
outstanding during the year (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.28%
4.23%
1.48%
0.18%
0.04%
Allowance for credit losses to non-performing
portfolio loans at year-end (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
100.10%
77.36%
68.87% 102.99% 213.28%
Allowance for credit losses to gross loans at
year-end (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.60%
3.15%
1.73%
1.04%
1.13%
(1) Excluding loans held for sale
(2) Excluding non-accrual loans held for sale
76
Our allowance for loan losses consists of the following:
•
Specific allowance: For impaired loans, we provide specific allowances for loans that are not collateral
dependent based on an evaluation of the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at
the loan’s effective interest rate and for loans that are collateral dependent based on the fair value of the
underlying collateral, which is determined based on the most recent valuation information received,
which may be adjusted based on factors such as changes in market conditions from the time of
valuation. If the measure of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, the
deficiency will be charged off against the allowance for loan losses or, alternatively, a specific
allocation will be established.
• General allowance: The unclassified portfolio is segmented on a group basis. Segmentation is
determined by loan type and common risk characteristics. The non-impaired loans are grouped into 23
segments: two commercial segments, ten commercial real estate segments, three residential construction
segments, three non-residential construction segments, one SBA segment, one installment loans
segment, one residential mortgage segment, one equity lines of credit segment, and one overdrafts
segment. The allowance is provided for each segmented group based on the group’s historical loan loss
experience aggregated based on loan risk classifications which takes into account the current financial
condition of the borrowers and guarantors, the prevailing value of the underlying collateral if collateral
dependent, charge-off history, management’s knowledge of the portfolio, general economic conditions,
and environmental factors which include the trends in delinquency and non-accrual, and other
significant factors, such as the national and local economy, volume and composition of the portfolio,
strength of management and loan staff, underwriting standards, and concentration of credit. In addition,
management reviews reports on past-due loans to ensure appropriate classifications. During the third
quarter of 2007, we revised our minimum loss rates for loans rated Special Mention and Substandard to
incorporate the results of a classification migration model reflecting actual losses beginning in 2003.
Beginning in the third quarter of 2007, minimum loss rates have been assigned for loans graded
Minimally Acceptable instead of grouping these loans with the unclassified portfolio. During the second
quarter of 2009, in light of the continued deterioration in the economy and the increases in non-accrual
loans and charge-offs, and based in part on regulatory considerations, we shortened the period used in
the migration analysis from five years to four years to better reflect the impact of the most recent
charge-offs, which increased the allowance for loan losses by $3.9 million; we increased the general
allowance to reflect the higher loan delinquency trends, the weaker national and local economy and the
increased difficulty in assigning loan grades, which increased the allowance for loan losses by
$13.2 million, and we also applied the environmental factors described above to loans rated Minimally
Acceptable, Special Mention and Substandard, which increased the allowance for loan losses by
$11.8 million. During the fourth quarter of 2009, we changed our migration loss analysis to reduce the
weighting of the first two years of the four-year migration analysis by half to better reflect the impact of
more recent losses, and further segmented the construction loan portfolios into three geographic
segments. The changes made during the fourth quarter of 2009 did not have a significant impact on the
allowance for loan losses. During the first quarter of 2010, we increased the number of segments for
commercial real estate loans from one to ten. In addition, we changed our migration loss analysis to use
as the reserve factor for loans rated Pass the total weighted average losses during the last four years for
each loan segment as well as the weighting for the four-year migration so that the first two years are
weighted one-third and the most recent two years are weighted two-thirds. The changes made during the
first quarter of 2010 increased the allowance for loan losses by $10.4 million. During the second quarter
of 2010, we further refined our methodology to give greater weighting to the most recent twelve months
of charge-offs in the calculation of the loan loss reserve percentage for Pass rated loans, which increased
the allowance for loan losses by $10.4 million; we discontinued the weighting in the four-year migration
analysis for loans rated lower than Pass, which increased the allowance for loan losses by $7.1 million,
and we increased the environmental factors for purchased syndicated loans, which increased the
allowance for loan losses by $2.0 million.
77
The table set forth below reflects management’s allocation of the allowance for loan losses by loan category
and the ratio of each loan category to the total loans as of the dates indicated:
Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses
As of December 31,
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
Percentage
of Loans in
Each
Category to
to Average
Gross Loans Amount
Percentage
of Loans in
Each
Category to
to Average
Gross Loans Amount
Percentage
of Loans in
Each
Category to
to Average
Gross Loans Amount
Percentage
of Loans in
Each
Category to
to Average
Gross Loans Amount
Percentage
of Loans in
Each
Category to
to Average
Gross Loans
Amount
(Dollars in thousands)
Type of Loans:
Commercial
loans . . . . . . . . . . $ 63,919
19.7% $ 57,815
20.2% $ 44,508
21.7% $24,081
21.1% $31,067
20.9%
Residential
mortgage loans
and equity
lines . . . . . . . . . .
9,668
13.9
8,480
11.4
2,678
10.2
1,314
9.9
1,458
9.1
Commercial
mortgage
loans . . . . . . . . . . 128,347
Real estate
construction
loans . . . . . . . . . .
Installment and
43,261
other loans . . . . .
36
58.3
100,494
56.8
35,060
55.7
26,646
56.4
22,226
57.6
7.8
0.3
45,086
11.3
39,820
12.1
12,906
12.1
5,449
11.8
14
0.3
27
0.3
36
0.5
20
0.6
Total . . . . . . . . $245,231
100.0% $211,889
100.0% $122,093
100.0% $64,983
100.0% $60,220
100.0%
The increase of $6.1 million in the allowance allocated to commercial loans to $63.9 million at
December 31, 2010, from $57.8 million at December 31, 2009, is due primarily to the growth of commercial
loans. Commercial loans increased $133.3 million, or 10.2%, from $1.3 billion at December 31, 2009 to
$1.4 billion at December 31, 2010. At December 31, 2010, thirty-six commercial loans totaling $31.5 million
were on non-accrual status and no commercial loans were past due 90 days and still accruing interest. At
December 31, 2009, forty commercial loans totaling $26.6 million were on non-accrual status and no commercial
loans were past due 90 days and still accruing interest. Commercial loans comprised 9.3% of impaired loans and
13.0% of non-accrual portfolio loans at December 31, 2010, compared to 9.9% of impaired loans and 9.5% of
non-accrual portfolio loans at December 31, 2009.
The allowance allocated to residential mortgage loans and equity lines increased $1.2 million, to
$9.7 million at December 31, 2010, from $8.5 million at December 31, 2009 primarily due to an increase in
residential mortgage loans of $170.2 million, or 24.9%, to $852.5 million at December 31, 2010, from
$682.3 million at December 31, 2009.
The allowance allocated to commercial mortgage loans increased from $100.5 million at December 31,
2009, to $128.3 million at December 31, 2010, due to increases in loans risk graded Minimally Acceptable and
increases in the four-year weighted average loss rate. The overall allowance for total commercial mortgage loans
was 3.3% at December 31, 2010, compared to 2.5% at December 31, 2009. At December 31, 2010, 64
commercial mortgage loans, excluding non-accrual loans held for sale, totaling $144.6 million were on
non-accrual status. At December 31, 2009, 67 commercial mortgage loans, excluding non-accrual loans held for
sale, totaling $153.3 million were on non-accrual status. Commercial mortgage loans comprised 66.2% of
impaired loans, 59.7% of non-accrual portfolio loans, and 16.6% of loans over 90 days past due still on accrual
status at December 31, 2010, compared to 59.8% of impaired loans and 54.6% of non-accrual portfolio loans at
December 31, 2009. No loans were over 90 days past due still on accrual status at December 31, 2009.
78
The allowance allocated for construction loans decreased $1.8 million to $43.3 million, or 10.6%, of
construction loans at December 31, 2010, compared to $45.1 million, or 7.2%, of construction loans at
December 31, 2009, primarily due to decreases in construction loans of $216.1 million, or 34.5%, from
$626.1 million at December 31, 2009, to $410.0 million at December 31, 2010. Fourteen construction loans
totaling $53.9 million were on non-accrual status at December 31, 2010, compared to twenty two loans totaling
$91.3 million at December 31, 2009. Construction loans comprised 20.3% of impaired loans, 22.3% of
non-accrual portfolio loans, and 83.4% of loans over 90 days still on accrual status at December 31, 2010,
compared to 27.7% of impaired loans and 32.5% of non-accrual portfolio loans at December 31, 2009.
Also, see Part I — Item 1A — “Risk Factors” above in this Annual Report Form 10-K for additional factors
that could cause actual results to differ materially from forward-looking statements or historical performance.
Liquidity
Liquidity is our ability to maintain sufficient cash flow to meet maturing financial obligations and customer
credit needs, and to take advantage of investment opportunities as they are presented in the marketplace. Our
principal sources of liquidity are growth in deposits, proceeds from the maturity or sale of securities and other
financial instruments, repayments from securities and loans, federal funds purchased, securities sold under
agreements to repurchase, and advances from the FHLB. At December 31, 2010, our liquidity ratio (defined as
net cash and short-term and marketable securities to net deposits and short-term liabilities) decreased to 20.3%
primarily due to lower securities balances, compared to 25.4% at December 31, 2009.
The Bank is a shareholder of the FHLB, which enables the Bank to have access to lower-cost FHLB financing
when necessary. At December 31, 2010, the Bank had an approved credit line with the FHLB of San Francisco
totaling $1.54 billion. Total advances from the FHLB of San Francisco were $550.0 million at December 31, 2010.
These borrowings bear fixed rates and are secured by loans and securities. See Note 10 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements. At December 31, 2010, the Bank pledged $286.6 million of its commercial loans to the
Federal Reserve Bank’s Discount Window under the Borrower-in-Custody program. The Bank had borrowing
capacity of $259.1 million from Federal Reserve Bank Discount Window at December 31, 2010.
Liquidity can also be provided through the sale of liquid assets, which consist of federal funds sold,
securities purchased under agreements to resell, and securities available-for-sale. At December 31, 2010,
investment securities totaled $2.84 billion, with $1.80 billion pledged as collateral for borrowings and other
commitments. The remaining $1.04 billion was available as additional liquidity or to be pledged as collateral for
additional borrowings.
Approximately 95.0% of our time deposits mature within one year or less as of December 31, 2010.
Management anticipates that there may be some outflow of these deposits upon maturity due to the keen
competition in the Bank’s marketplace. However, based on our historical runoff experience, we expect the
outflow will not be significant and can be replenished through our normal growth in deposits. Management
believes all the above-mentioned sources will provide adequate liquidity for the next twelve months to the Bank
to meet its operating needs.
The Company obtains funding for its activities primarily through dividend income contributed by the Bank,
the issuance of additional common stock and, to a lesser extent, proceeds from the issuance of the Bancorp
common stock through our Dividend Reinvestment Plan and exercise of stock options. Dividends paid to the
Bancorp by the Bank are subject to regulatory limitations and approval. In light of the uncertain economic times
and the regulatory considerations described above under “Dividend Policy” and “Regulatory Matters”, the Bank
did not pay a dividend to the Bancorp in 2009 and is not expected to pay a dividend to the Bancorp in 2010. The
business activities of the Bancorp consist primarily of the operation of the Bank and limited activities in other
investments. Management believes the Bancorp’s cash on hand of $37.3 million on December 31, 2010, is
sufficient to meet its operational needs for the next twelve months.
79
Also, see Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements regarding commitments and contingencies.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for details of recent accounting pronouncements and
their expected impact, if any, on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
Market Risk
Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and rates. The principal market risk to
the Company is the interest rate risk inherent in our lending, investing, deposit taking and borrowing activities,
due to the fact that interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities do not re-price at the same rate, to the
same extent, or on the same basis.
We monitor and manage our interest rate risk through analyzing the re-pricing characteristics of our loans,
securities, deposits, and borrowings on an on-going basis. The primary objective is to minimize the adverse
effects of changes in interest rates on our earnings, and ultimately the underlying market value of equity, while
structuring our asset-liability composition to obtain the maximum spread. Management uses certain basic
measurement tools in conjunction with established risk limits to regulate its interest rate exposure. Due to the
limitation inherent in any individual risk management tool, we use a simulation model to measure and quantify
the impact to our profitability as well as to estimate changes to the market value of our assets and liabilities.
We use a net interest income simulation model to measure the extent of the differences in the behavior of
the lending, investing, and funding rates to changing interest rates, so as to project future earnings or market
values under alternative interest rate scenarios. Interest rate risk arises primarily through the traditional business
activities of extending loans, investing securities, accepting deposits, and borrowings. Many factors, including
economic and financial conditions, movements in interest rates, and consumer preferences affect the spread
between interest earned on assets and interest paid on liabilities. The net interest income simulation model is
designed to measure the volatility of net interest income and net portfolio value, defined as net present value of
assets and liabilities, under immediate rising or falling interest rate scenarios in 25 basis points increments.
Although the modeling is very helpful in managing interest rate risk, it does require significant assumptions
for the projection of loan prepayment rates on mortgage related assets, loan volumes and pricing, and deposit and
borrowing volume and pricing, that might prove inaccurate. Because these assumptions are inherently uncertain,
the model cannot precisely estimate net interest income, or precisely predict the effect of higher or lower interest
rates on net interest income. Actual results will differ from simulated results due to the timing, magnitude, and
frequency of interest rates changes, the differences between actual experience and the assumed volume, changes
in market conditions, and management strategies, among other factors. The Company monitors its interest rate
sensitivity and attempts to reduce the risk of a significant decrease in net interest income caused by a change in
interest rates.
We establish a tolerance level in our policy to define and limit interest income volatility to a change of plus
or minus 15% when the hypothetical rate change is plus or minus 200 basis points. When the net interest rate
simulation projects that our tolerance level will be met or exceeded, we seek corrective action after considering,
among other things, market conditions, customer reaction, and the estimated impact on profitability. At
December 31, 2010, if interest rates were to increase instantaneously by 100 basis points, the simulation
indicated that our net interest income over the next twelve months would increase by 4.1%, and if interest rates
were to increase instantaneously by 200 basis points, the simulation indicated that our net interest income over
the next twelve months would increase by 7.0%. Conversely, if interest rates were to decrease instantaneously by
100 basis points, the simulation indicated that our net interest income over the next twelve months would
decrease by 2.7%, and if interest rates were to decrease instantaneously by 200 basis points, the simulation
indicated that our net interest income over the next twelve months would decrease by 8.6%.
80
Our simulation model also projects the net market value of our portfolio of assets and liabilities. We have
established a tolerance level to value the net market value of our portfolio of assets and liabilities in our policy to
a change of plus or minus 15% when the hypothetical rate change is plus or minus 200 basis points. At
December 31, 2010, if interest rates were to increase instantaneously by 200 basis points, the simulation
indicated that the net market value of our portfolio of assets and liabilities would increase by 5.8%, and
conversely, if interest rates were to decrease instantaneously by 200 basis points, the simulation indicated that the
net market value of our assets and liabilities would decrease by 3.9%.
Quantitative Information About Interest Rate Risk
The following table shows the carrying value of our financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in
interest rates, categorized by expected maturity, as well as the instruments’ total fair values at December 31,
2010, and 2009. For assets, expected maturities are based on contractual maturity. For liabilities, we use our
historical experience and decay factors to estimate the deposit runoffs of interest-bearing transactional deposits.
We use certain assumptions to estimate fair values and expected maturities which are described in Note 17 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements. Off-balance sheet commitments to extend credit, letters of credit, and bill of
lading guarantees represent the contractual unfunded amounts. Off-balance sheet financial instruments represent
fair values. The results presented may vary if different assumptions are used or if actual experience differs from
the assumptions used.
Average
Interest
Rate
Expected Maturity Date at December 31,
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015 Thereafter
Total
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31,
2010
2009
Fair
Value
Total
Fair
Value
Interest-Sensitive Assets:
Mortgage-backed securities and
collateralized mortgage
obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other investment securities . . . . . . .
Loans held-for-sale . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross loans receivable:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial
Residential Mortgage . . . . . . . .
Commercial Mortgage . . . . . . .
Real estate construction . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
Installment & other
Securities purchased under
agreements to resell . . . . . . . . . . .
Trading securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest Sensitive Liabilities:
Other interest-bearing deposits . . . .
Time deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities sold under agreements to
3.61% $ 309,733 $222,696 $162,812 $115,420 $ 85,354 $ 371,591 $1,267,606 $1,271,183 $2,525,104 $2,517,810
832,500 1,576,063 1,569,743 1,025,010 1,026,197
2.85
54,826
6.86
100,732 163,888
—
— 393,712
—
—
85,231
—
54,826
2,873
2,873
2,873
—
4.59
5.09
5.92
5.49
2.84
0.20
1.32
0.54
1.35
4,776
77,426
7,652
1,084,039 180,041
10,300
41,490 1,441,167 1,372,508 1,307,880 1,303,489
884,008
730,341 563,275 502,409 472,113 548,480 1,123,443 3,940,061 3,773,673 4,065,155 3,745,934
580,296
349,767
14,443
15,639
30,914
9,881 1,025,877 1,061,330 1,072,510
— 17,226
18
366,473
11,337
626,087
21,754
409,986
16,077
41,106
414
27,257
2,844
1,887
—
878,266
—
—
6
110,000
1,517
—
2,278
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
23
110,000
3,818
110,000
3,818
—
18
—
18
235,140 234,137 151,174 122,632 106,650
150
24,211
4,059,152 191,408
60
936,832 1,786,565 1,786,565 1,628,192 1,628,192
— 4,274,981 4,290,048 5,012,297 5,027,861
repurchase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.18
111,000
50,000
— 950,000 250,000
200,000 1,561,000 1,704,585 1,557,000 1,695,130
Advances from the Federal Home
Loan Bank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.43
— 550,000
5,824
—
—
2,641
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
550,000
580,054
929,362
993,243
—
19,111
171,136
8,465
19,111
171,136
8,474
19,111
114,557
7,212
19,320
171,136
7,090
19,320
92,553
Other borrowings from financial
institutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0.48
Other borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —
Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.15
Off-Balance Sheet Financial
Instruments:
Commitments to extend credit . . . . .
Standby letters of credit . . . . . . . . . .
Other letters of credit . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bill of lading guarantees . . . . . . . . .
965,093 154,507
1,369
58,440
632
62,090
—
245
23,595
67
—
—
17,521
—
—
—
11,144
—
—
—
188,406 1,360,266
59,876
62,722
245
—
—
—
(603) 1,591,019
61,488
(282)
49,257
(38)
300
(1)
(621)
(200)
(22)
(1)
81
Financial Derivatives
It is our policy not to speculate on the future direction of interest rates. However, we enter into financial
derivatives in order to seek mitigation of exposure to interest rate risks related to our interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities. We believe that these transactions, when properly structured and managed, may
provide a hedge against inherent interest rate risk in our assets or liabilities and against risk in specific
transactions. In such instances, we may protect our position through the purchase or sale of interest rate futures
contracts for a specific cash or interest rate risk position. Other hedge transactions may be implemented using
interest rate swaps, interest rate caps, floors, financial futures, forward rate agreements, and options on futures or
bonds. Prior to considering any hedging activities, we seek to analyze the costs and benefits of the hedge in
comparison to other viable alternative strategies. All hedges will require an assessment of basis risk and must be
approved by the Bank’s Investment Committee.
We follow ASC Topic 815 which established accounting and reporting standards for financial derivatives,
including certain financial derivatives embedded in other contracts, and hedging activities. It requires the
recognition of all financial derivatives as assets or liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets and measurement
of those financial derivatives at fair value. The accounting treatment of changes in fair value is dependent upon
whether or not a financial derivative is designated as a hedge and if so, the type of hedge.
As of December 31, 2010, we had five interest rate swap agreements outstanding with two major financial
institutions in the notional amount of $300.0 million for a period of three years. These interest rate swaps were
not structured to hedge against inherent interest rate risks related to our interest-earning assets and interest-
bearing liabilities. At December 31, 2010, we paid a fixed rate at a weighted average rate of 1.95% and received
a floating 3-month Libor rate at a weighted average rate of 0.30%. The net amount accrued on these interest rate
swaps of $4.8 million for 2010 was recorded to reduce other non-interest income compared to $2.4 million for
2009. At December 31, 2010, we recorded $5.8 million within other liabilities to recognize the negative fair
value of these interest rate swaps compared to $694,000 at December 31, 2009.
We enter into foreign exchange forward contracts and foreign currency option contracts with various
counterparties to mitigate the risk of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, for foreign exchange
certificates of deposit, foreign currency contracts or foreign currency option contracts entered into with our
clients. These contracts are not designated as hedging instruments and are recorded at fair value in our
consolidated balance sheets. Changes in the fair value of these contracts as well as the related foreign currency
certificates of deposit, foreign exchange contracts, or foreign currency option contracts are recognized
immediately in operations as a component of non-interest income. Period end gross positive fair values are
recorded in other assets and gross negative fair values are recorded in other liabilities. At December 31, 2010, the
notional amount of option contracts totaled $29.3 million with a net positive fair value of $35,000. Spot and
forward contracts in the total notional amount of $112.7 million had positive fair value, in the amount of
$4.6 million, at December 31, 2010. Spot and forward contracts in the total notional amount of $68.4 million had
a negative fair value, in the amount of $1.9 million, at December 31, 2010. At December 31, 2009, the notional
amount of option contracts totaled $4.7 million with a net positive fair value of $10,000. Spot and forward
contracts in the total notional amount of $60.7 million had positive fair value, in the amount of $3.6 million, at
December 31, 2009. Spot and forward contracts in the total notional amount of $60.8 million had a negative fair
value, in the amount of $967,000, at December 31, 2009.
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
For financial statements, see “Index to Consolidated Financial Statements” on page F-1.
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
Not Applicable.
82
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Bancorp’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the
Bancorp’s “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”) as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report
on Form 10-K. Based upon their evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer have
concluded that the Bancorp’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to
be disclosed by the Bancorp in the reports filed or submitted by it under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and include controls and
procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Bancorp in such reports is
accumulated and communicated to the Bancorp’s management, including its principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There were no significant changes in the Bancorp’s internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date the principal executive officer and principal financial
officer completed their evaluation.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control
over financial reporting as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. The Company’s
internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of the Company’s Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of the Company’s financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As of December 31, 2010, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management,
including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the Company assessed the
effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria for effective internal control
over financial reporting established in “Internal Control — Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on the assessment, management
determined that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2010, based on those criteria.
KPMG LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the Company’s consolidated
financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has also issued an audit report on the
effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010. The report,
which expresses an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2010, is included in this Item under the heading “Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm” below.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, as such term is
defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act, during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially effect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
83
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Cathay General Bancorp:
We have audited Cathay General Bancorp’s (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Cathay General Bancorp’s
management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit
included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material
weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Cathay General Bancorp maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Cathay General Bancorp and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), changes
in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010,
and our report dated February 25, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial
statements.
Los Angeles, California
February 25, 2011
/s/ KPMG LLP
84
Item 9B. Other Information.
None.
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
The information required by this item concerning our executive officers, directors, compliance with
Section 16 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the code of ethics that applies to our principal executive
officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer, and matters relating to corporate governance
is incorporated herein by reference from the information set forth under the captions “Election of Directors,”
“Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” “The Board of Directors” and “Code of Ethics” in
our Definitive Proxy Statement relating to our 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”).
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the information set forth
under the captions “The Board of Directors—Compensation of Directors,” “Executive Compensation,” and
“Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control,” in our Proxy Statement.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table sets forth certain information as of December 31, 2010, with respect to compensation
plans under which equity securities of the Company were authorized for issuance.
Plan Category
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders . . . .
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security
Holders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Number of
Securities to be
Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants,
and Rights 1/
(a)
4,947,348
—
Total
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4,947,348
Weighted-average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants, and
Rights
(b)
Number of Securities
Remaining Available For
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation Plans
[Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column (a)]
(c)
$27.93
—
$27.93
1,839,153
—
1,839,153
1/
Includes options granted under the GBC Bancorp 1999 Employee Stock Incentive Plan (the “GBC Bancorp Plan”). On
October 20, 2003, pursuant to the terms of its merger with GBC Bancorp, the Company assumed an obligation to issue
up to 1,416,520 shares of the Company’s common stock on exercise of outstanding options under the GBC Bancorp
Plan. As of December 31, 2010, options on 437,394 shares remain outstanding under the GBC Bancorp Plan. No further
grants will be made under the GBC Bancorp Plan.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth under
the captions “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Election of Directors-
Security Ownership of Nominees, Continuing Directors, and Named Executive Officers” in our Proxy Statement.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth under
the captions “Transactions with Related Persons, Promoters and Certain Control Persons” and “The Board of
Directors- Director Independence” in our Proxy Statement.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the information set forth
under the caption “Principal Accounting Fees and Services” in our Proxy Statement.
85
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.
Documents Filed as Part of this Report
(a)(1) Financial Statements
See “Index to Consolidated Financial Statements” on page F-1.
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules
Schedules have been omitted since they are not applicable, they are not required, or the information required
to be set forth in the schedules is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes thereto.
(b) Exhibits
3.1
3.1.1
3.2
3.2.1
3.2.2
3.3
3.4
4.1
4.1.1
Restated Certificate of Incorporation. Previously filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 16, 2010, as an exhibit to Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.
Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation. Previously filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 16, 2010, as an exhibit to Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.
Restated Bylaws. Previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16,
2010, as an exhibit to Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009, and incorporated herein by reference.
Amendment to Restated Bylaws, effective October 20, 2003. Previously filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2010, as an exhibit to Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.
Amendment to Restated Bylaws, effective October 18, 2007. Previously filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on October 22, 2007, as an exhibit to Bancorp’s Current Report on
Form 8-K, and incorporated herein by this reference.
Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock. Previously filed with
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 1, 2007, as an exhibit to Bancorp’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.
Certificate of Designation of Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series B.
Previously filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on December 5, 2008, as an exhibit to
Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K, and incorporated herein by reference.
Indenture, dated as of March 30, 2007, between Cathay General Bancorp and LaSalle Bank
National Association (including form of debenture). Previously filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on May 10, 2007, as an exhibit to Bancorp’s Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, and incorporated herein by this reference.
Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of Cathay Capital Trust III, dated as of March 30,
2007. Previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 10, 2007, as an
exhibit to Bancorp’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, and
incorporated herein by this reference.
86
4.1.2
4.1.3
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
10.1
10.2
10.2.1
Guarantee Agreement, dated as of March 30, 2007, between Cathay General Bancorp and LaSalle
Bank National Association. Previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May
10, 2007, as an exhibit to Bancorp’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2007, and incorporated herein by this reference.
Form of Capital Securities of Cathay Capital Trust III (included within Exhibit 4.1.1) Previously
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 10, 2007, as an exhibit to Bancorp’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, and incorporated herein by
this reference.
Warrant to purchase up to 1,846,374 shares of Common Stock, issued on December 5, 2008.
Previously filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on December 5, 2008, as an exhibit to
Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K, and incorporated herein by reference.
Form of Preferred Share Certificate for Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series B.
Previously filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on December 5, 2008, as an exhibit to
Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K, and incorporated herein by reference.
Distribution Agreement, dated as of September 9, 2009, between Cathay General Bancorp and J.P.
Morgan Securities Inc. Previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
September 23, 2009, as an exhibit to the Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A, and
incorporated herein by reference.
Distribution Agreement, dated as of September 9, 2009, between Cathay General Bancorp and
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. Previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
September 23, 2009, as an exhibit to the Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A, and
incorporated herein by reference.
Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 13, 2009, between Cathay General Bancorp and Merrill
Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated. Previously filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on October 14, 2009, as an exhibit to the Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K, and
incorporated herein by reference.
ATM Equity Offering SM Sales Agreement, dated November 23, 2009, between Cathay General
Bancorp and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated. Previously filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on November 23, 2009, as an exhibit to the Bancorp’s
Current Report on Form 8-K, and incorporated herein by reference.
Form of Indemnity Agreements between the Bancorp and its directors and certain officers.
Previously filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on March 1, 2007, as an exhibit to
Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, and incorporated
herein by reference.
Cathay Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1,
2010.**+
Amendment No. 7 effective July 1, 2007, January 1, 2007, January 1, 2008, December 31, 2008,
January 1, 2009, and January 1, 2010 to the Amended and Restated Cathay Bank Employee Stock
Ownership Plan effective January 1, 1997. Previously filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 16, 2010, as an exhibit to Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.**
10.3
Dividend Reinvestment Plan of the Bancorp. Previously filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on April 30, 1997, as an exhibit to Registration Statement No. 33-33767, and
incorporated herein by reference.
87
10.4
10.4.1
10.5
10.6
10.7
Equity Incentive Plan of the Bancorp effective February 19, 1998. Previously filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2006, as an exhibit to the Bancorp’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, and incorporated herein by
reference.**
First Amendment to Cathay Bancorp, Inc. Equity Incentive Plan. Previously filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2, 2009, as an exhibit to the Bancorp’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, and incorporated herein by
reference.**
GBC Bancorp 1999 Employee Stock Incentive Plan. Previously filed with Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 1, 2007, as an exhibit to Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.**
Cathay Bank Bonus Deferral Agreement (Amended and Restated). Previously filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on November 9, 2007, as an exhibit to Bancorp’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, and incorporated herein by this
reference.**
Cathay General Bancorp 2005 Incentive Plan (Amended and Restated). Previously filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on November 9, 2007, as an exhibit to Bancorp’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, and incorporated herein by this
reference.**
10.7.1
Form of Cathay General Bancorp 2005 Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Award Agreement. **+
10.7.2
10.7.3
10.7.4
10.8
10.9
10.9.1
Form of Cathay General Bancorp 2005 Incentive Plan Stock Option Agreement (Nonstatutory). **+
Form of Cathay General Bancorp 2005 Incentive Plan Stock Option Agreement (Nonstatutory)
(Nonemployee Director). Previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March
2, 2009, as an exhibit to the Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.**
Form of Cathay General Bancorp 2005 Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Agreement. Previously
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2, 2009, as an exhibit to the
Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, and incorporated
herein by reference.**
Letter Agreement, dated December 5, 2008, including the Securities Purchase Agreement —
Standard Terms incorporated by reference therein, between the Company and the U.S. Treasury.
Previously filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on December 5, 2008, as an exhibit to
Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K and incorporated herein by reference.
Form of Waiver, executed by each of Messrs. Dunson K. Cheng, Peter Wu, Anthony M. Tang,
Heng W. Chen, Irwin Wong, Kim R. Bingham, and Perry P. Oei. Previously filed with Securities
and Exchange Commission on December 5, 2008, as an exhibit to Bancorp’s Current Report on
Form 8-K, and incorporated herein by reference.**
Form of Consent, executed by each of Messrs. Dunson K. Cheng, Peter Wu, Anthony M. Tang,
Heng W. Chen, Irwin Wong, Kim R. Bingham, and Perry P. Oei as to adoption of amendments to
Benefit Plans as required by Section 111(b) of EESA. Previously filed with Securities and
Exchange Commission on December 5, 2008, as an exhibit to Bancorp’s Current Report on Form
8-K, and incorporated herein by reference.**
88
10.9.2
10.10
10.10.1
10.10.2
10.10.3
10.10.4
10.10.5
10.10.6
12.1
21.1
23.1
24.1
31.1
31.2
32.1
Form of Consent, executed by each of Messrs. Dunson K. Cheng, Peter Wu, Anthony M. Tang,
Heng W. Chen, Irwin Wong, Kim R. Bingham, and Perry P. Oei as to adoption of amendments to
Benefit Plans as required by Section 111(b) of EESA, as amended by the American Recovery
Reinvestment Act of 2009. Previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
March 16, 2010, as an exhibit to Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.**
Amended and Restated Change of Control Employment Agreement for Dunson K. Cheng dated as
of December 18, 2008. Previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March
2, 2009, as an exhibit to the Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.**
Amended and Restated Change of Control Employment Agreement for Peter Wu dated as of
December 18, 2008. Previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2,
2009, as an exhibit to the Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.**
Amended and Restated Change of Control Employment Agreement for Anthony M. Tang dated as
of December 18, 2008. Previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March
2, 2009, as an exhibit to the Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.**
Amended and Restated Change of Control Employment Agreement for Heng W. Chen dated as of
December 18, 2008. Previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2,
2009, as an exhibit to the Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.**
Amended and Restated Change of Control Employment Agreement for Irwin Wong dated as of
December 18, 2008. Previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2,
2009, as an exhibit to the Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.**
Amended and Restated Change of Control Employment Agreement for Kim Bingham dated as of
December 18, 2008. Previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2,
2009, as an exhibit to the Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.**
Amended and Restated Change of Control Employment Agreement for Perry P. Oei dated as of
December 18, 2008. Previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2,
2009, as an exhibit to the Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.**
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends. +
Subsidiaries of the Bancorp.+
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.+
Power of Attorney.+
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.+
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.+
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.++
89
32.2
99.1
99.2
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.++
Certification for Years Following First Fiscal Year of the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 111(b) of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008.+
Certification for Years Following First Fiscal Year of the Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to
Section 111(b) of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008.+
** Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
+
Filed herewith.
++ Furnished herewith.
90
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SIGNATURES
Cathay General Bancorp
By:
/s/ DUNSON K. CHENG
Dunson K. Cheng
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer
Date: February 25, 2011
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by
the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature
Title
Date
/s/ DUNSON K. CHENG
Dunson K. Cheng
/s/ HENG W. CHEN
Heng W. Chen
/s/ PETER WU
Peter Wu
/s/ ANTHONY M. TANG
Anthony M. Tang
/s/ KELLY L. CHAN
Kelly L. Chan
/s/ MICHAEL M.Y. CHANG
Michael M.Y. Chang
/s/ THOMAS C.T. CHIU
Thomas C.T. Chiu
/s/ NELSON CHUNG
Nelson Chung
/s/ PATRICK S.D. LEE
Patrick S.D. Lee
President, Chairman of the
Board, Director, and Chief
Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer/Treasurer
(principal financial officer)
(principal accounting officer)
February 25, 2011
February 25, 2011
Director
February 25, 2011
Director
February 25, 2011
Director
February 25, 2011
Director
February 25, 2011
Director
February 25, 2011
Director
February 25, 2011
Director
February 25, 2011
91
Signature
/s/ TING LIU
Ting Liu
/s/
JOSEPH C.H. POON
Joseph C.H. Poon
/s/ THOMAS G. TARTAGLIA
Thomas G. Tartaglia
Title
Director
Date
February 25, 2011
Director
February 25, 2011
Director
February 25, 2011
92
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2010 and 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Page
F-2
F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income/(Loss) for each of the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 ..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F-4
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for each of the years ended December 31,
2010, 2009, and 2008 ..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and
2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F-7
F-9
Parent-only condensed financial information of Cathay General Bancorp is included in Note 20 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-53
F-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Cathay General Bancorp:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Cathay General Bancorp and subsidiaries (the
Company) as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations and
comprehensive income (loss), changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-
year period ended December 31, 2010. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements
based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of Cathay General Bancorp and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results
of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010 in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States), Cathay General Bancorp’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010,
based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 25, 2011 expressed an
unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Los Angeles, California
February 25, 2011
F-2
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Short-term investments and interest bearing deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities purchased under agreements to resell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities held-to-maturity (market value of $837,359 in 2010 and $628,908 in 2009) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities available-for-sale (amortized cost of $2,005,330 in 2010 and $2,916,491 in 2009) . . . . . . . . . . .
Trading securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: Allowance for loan losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unamortized deferred loan fees, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans, net
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Federal Home Loan Bank stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other real estate owned, net
Affordable housing investments, net
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Premises and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Customers’ liability on acceptances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued interest receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other intangible assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
As of December 31,
2010
2009
(In thousands, except share
and per share data)
$
87,347
206,321
110,000
840,102
2,003,567
3,818
2,873
6,868,621
(245,231)
(7,621)
6,615,769
63,873
77,740
88,472
109,456
14,014
35,382
316,340
17,044
209,868
$
100,124
254,726
—
635,015
2,915,099
18
54,826
6,899,142
(211,889)
(8,339)
6,678,914
71,791
71,014
95,853
108,635
26,554
35,982
316,340
23,157
200,184
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$10,801,986
$11,588,232
Deposits
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Non-interest-bearing demand deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest-bearing deposits:
NOW deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Money market deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Savings deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Time deposits under $100,000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Time deposits of $100,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other borrowings from financial institutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other borrowings for affordable housing investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acceptances outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commitments and contingencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stockholders’ Equity
Preferred stock, 10,000,000 shares authorized, 258,000 issued and outstanding in 2010 and 2009 . . .
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 82,739,348 issued and 78,531,783
outstanding at December 31, 2010, and 67,667,155 issued and 63,459,590 outstanding at
December 31, 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additional paid-in-capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss), net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Treasury stock, at cost (4,207,565 shares at December 31, 2010, and at December 31, 2009) . . . . . . .
$
930,300
$
864,551
418,703
982,617
385,245
1,081,266
3,193,715
6,991,846
1,561,000
550,000
8,465
19,111
171,136
14,014
50,309
9,365,881
—
337,304
943,164
347,724
1,529,954
3,482,343
7,505,040
1,557,000
929,362
7,212
19,320
171,136
26,554
59,864
10,275,488
—
247,455
243,967
827
762,509
(1,022)
543,625
(125,736)
677
634,623
(875)
551,588
(125,736)
Total Cathay General Bancorp stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,427,658
1,304,244
Noncontrolling interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8,447
8,500
Total equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,436,105
1,312,744
Total liabilities and equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$10,801,986
$11,588,232
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS)
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME
Loan receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment securities-taxable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment securities-nontaxable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Federal Home Loan Bank stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreement to resell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deposits with banks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Agency preferred stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
Total interest and dividend income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INTEREST EXPENSE
Time deposits of $100,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest on securities sold under agreements to repurchase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Short-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total interest expense .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net interest income before provision for credit losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for credit losses .
Net interest income/(loss) after provision for credit losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NON-INTEREST INCOME
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities gains/(losses), net
Letters of credit commissions .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depository service fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other operating income .
Total non-interest income .
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Salaries and employee benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Occupancy expense .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Computer and equipment expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Professional services expense .
FDIC and State assessments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Marketing expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other real estate owned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operations of investments in affordable housing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of core deposit premium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cost associated with debt redemption .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other operating expense .
Total non-interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Loss)/income before income tax (benefit)/expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax (benefit)/expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income/(loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income/(loss) attributable to Cathay General Bancorp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividends on preferred stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Year Ended December 31,
2008
2009
2010
(In thousands, except share and per
share data)
$
$
380,662
106,568
854
237
14
1,259
—
489,594
54,219
29,943
66,141
37,527
3,852
6
191,688
297,906
156,900
141,006
18,695
4,466
5,220
3,870
32,251
58,835
12,188
8,230
17,630
19,549
3,160
16,011
7,611
5,958
14,261
12,278
175,711
(2,454)
(14,629)
12,175
(610)
11,565
(16,388)
401,831
123,939
788
149
1,351
673
—
528,731
83,349
50,207
65,182
42,442
4,835
24
246,039
282,692
307,000
(24,308)
55,644
4,216
5,206
13,588
78,654
60,795
16,109
7,856
16,428
19,386
2,593
36,075
7,338
6,636
—
9,821
183,037
(128,691)
(61,912)
(66,779)
(611)
(67,390)
(16,338)
452,216
115,890
1,250
3,301
15,017
656
1,621
589,951
111,293
66,417
60,559
46,512
9,090
933
294,804
295,147
106,700
188,447
(5,971)
5,613
4,741
14,524
18,907
66,626
13,236
7,859
12,011
4,809
3,616
4,953
7,397
6,909
—
9,260
136,676
70,678
19,554
51,124
(603)
50,521
(1,140)
Net (loss)/income attributable to common stockholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
(4,823) $
(83,728) $
49,381
Other comprehensive (loss)/income, net of tax:
Unrealized holding gains/(losses) arising during the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: reclassification adjustment for gains/(losses) included in net income . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total other comprehensive (loss)/income, net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total comprehensive income/(loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net (loss)/income attributable to common stockholders per common share
Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Basic average common shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted average common shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
$
7,714
7,860
(146)
(806)
23,396
(24,202)
11,419
$
(91,592) $
21,361
(2,511)
23,872
74,393
(0.06) $
(0.06) $
(1.59) $
(1.59) $
77,073,954
77,073,954
52,629,159
52,629,159
1.00
1.00
49,414,824
49,529,793
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008
(In thousands, except number of shares)
Preferred Stock
Common Stock
Number
of Shares Amount
Number
of Shares Amount
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
Retained
Earnings
Treasury
Stock
Noncontrolling
Interest
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
— 49,336,187
$535
$480,557
$
(545)
$617,108 $(125,736)
$ —
$ 971,919
Balance at December 31,
2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustment to initially
apply EITF 06-4 . . . . . .
Balance at January 1,
2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Issuance of series B
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(147)
—
— 49,336,187
535
480,557
(545)
616,961
(125,736)
preferred stock . . . . . . . . 258,000 240,554
Issuance of common stock
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Issuances of common stock
warrant
— Dividend
Reinvestment Plan . . . . .
Stock options exercised . . .
Tax short-fall from stock
options . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock-based
compensation . . . . . . . .
Cash dividends of $0.420
per share . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividend on preferred
stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in other
comprehensive
income . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance at December 31,
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
17,673
151,157
20,906
1
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2,550
372
(247)
7,708
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(20,750)
(1,140)
23,872
—
—
50,521
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(147)
971,772
240,554
17,673
2,551
373
(247)
7,708
(20,750)
(1,140)
23,872
50,521
2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 258,000 240,554 49,508,250
537
508,613
23,327
645,592
(125,736)
0
1,292,887
Adjustment to intially
apply FASB No. 160 . . .
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
8,500
8,500
Balance at January 1,
2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 258,000 240,554 49,508,250
537
508,613
23,327
645,592
(125,736)
8,500
1,301,387
Forfeiture of restricted
stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Issuances of common
stock — Common stock
issuance . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividend Reinvestment
Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restricted stock units
vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock options exercised . . .
Tax short-fall from stock
options . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock-based
compensation . . . . . . . .
Cash dividends of $0.205
per share . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discount accretion and
other adjustment on
preferred stock . . . . . . . .
Dividends on preferred
stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in other
comprehensive loss . . . .
Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance at December 31,
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(20,000) —
—
— 13,869,856
139
119,309
—
—
—
—
—
—
3,413
—
—
—
87,241
1
1,159
12,963 —
1,280 —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
13
(196)
5,725
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(24,202)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(10,276)
(3,438)
(12,900)
—
(67,390)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(611)
—
611
—
119,448
1,160
—
13
(196)
5,725
(10,276)
(25)
(13,511)
(24,202)
(66,779)
2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 258,000 243,967 63,459,590
677
634,623
(875)
551,588
(125,736)
8,500
1,312,744
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY—(Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008
(In thousands, except number of shares)
Preferred Stock
Common Stock
Number
of Shares Amount
Number
of
Shares Amount
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
Retained
Earnings
Treasury
Stock
Noncontrolling
Interest
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
Issuances of common
stock — Common stock
issuance . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividend Reinvestment
Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restricted stock units
vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax short-fall from stock
options . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock-based
compensation . . . . . . . .
Cash dividends of $0.04
per share . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discount accretion and
other adjustment on
preferred stock . . . . . . .
Dividends on preferred
stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Redemption of
noncontrolling
interest
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in other
comprehensive loss . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance at December 31,
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
— 15,028,409
150
124,778
—
—
—
—
—
3,488
—
—
—
—
28,778 —
15,006 —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
310
—
(539)
3,337
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(147)
—
—
—
—
—
—
(3,140)
(3,488)
(12,900)
—
—
11,565
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
124,928
310
—
(539)
3,337
(3,140)
—
(610)
(13,510)
(53)
—
610
(53)
(147)
12,175
2010 .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 258,000 $247,455 78,531,783
$827
$762,509
$(1,022)
$543,625 $(125,736)
$8,447
$1,436,105
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net income/(loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for credit losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for losses on other real estate owned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred tax benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net (gains)/losses on sale and transfers of other real estate owned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net gains on sale of loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net gains on sale of loans held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sale of loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Originations of loans held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Write-downs on loans held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Increase in unrealized loss from interest rate swaps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase of trading securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Federal Home Loan Bank stock dividends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Write-down on venture capital and other investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Write-down on impaired securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sales and calls of securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other non-cash interest .
Amortization of security premiums, net .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of other intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Excess tax short-fall from stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gains on sale of premises and equipment .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decrease in accrued interest receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Noncontrolling interest .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decrease/(increase) in other assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decrease in other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decrease/(increase) in short-term investments .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decrease in long-term investments .
(Increase)/decrease in securities purchased under agreements to resell
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase of investment securities available-for-sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from maturity and call of investment securities available-for-sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sale of investment securities available-for-sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase of mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from repayment and sale of mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase of investment securities held-to-maturity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase of mortgage-backed securities held-to-maturity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from maturity and call of investment securities held-to-maturity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank stock .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net (increase)/decrease in loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase of premises and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net increase in investment in affordable housing .
Year Ended December 31,
2010
2009
2008
(In thousands)
$
12,175
$
(66,779)
$
51,124
156,900
20,139
(38,504)
4,619
(9,977)
(149)
(779)
7,481
(7,332)
3,160
5,814
(3,795)
—
515
492
(19,253)
(794)
6,667
6,034
539
3,337
—
600
(610)
34,594
(13,368)
168,505
307,000
28,216
(37,115)
7,695
2,065
(4,761)
—
44,597
(9,418)
—
—
—
—
1,982
817
(56,461)
7
2,816
6,703
196
5,725
—
7,621
(611)
(63,426)
(30,461)
146,408
106,700
3,604
(50,851)
4,166
11
(314)
—
10,599
(3,112)
—
—
—
(3,749)
1,458
35,331
(29,360)
(11)
2,035
7,006
247
7,708
(21)
9,429
(603)
24,305
(7,951)
167,751
48,404
—
(110,000)
(3,366,780)
2,876,414
65,139
—
1,351,018
(150,164)
(165,527)
108,067
—
7,918
(151,054)
(4,979)
—
91,154
(3,015)
(229,726)
—
201,000
(1,573,823)
1,428,468
51,679
(2,487,276)
2,760,904
(99,858)
(536,262)
1,057
—
—
177,690
(12,222)
—
52,902
(14,116)
(22,722)
50,000
315,100
(1,780,694)
1,063,538
651,423
(2,536,115)
1,898,882
—
—
—
(7,820)
5,498
(893,978)
(24,195)
21
683
(15,143)
Net cash used in investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
596,595
(279,583)
(1,295,522)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net increase/(decrease) in demand deposits, NOW accounts, money market and saving deposits . . . . . . .
Net (decrease)/increase in time deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net increase/(decrease) in federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreement to repurchase . . .
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Repayment of Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash dividends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Issuance of Series B preferred stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Issuance of common stock warrant
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Issuance of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from other borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Repayment of other borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from shares issued to Dividend Reinvestment Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from exercise of stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Excess tax short-fall from share-based payment arrangements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash provided by financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
224,122
(736,549)
4,000
528,000
(907,362)
(16,040)
—
—
124,928
1,253
—
310
—
(539)
(777,877)
(12,777)
100,124
529,359
138,945
(105,000)
816,000
(1,336,000)
(22,460)
—
—
119,448
7,212
—
1,160
13
(196)
(66,662)
625,031
229,975
4,253,534
(4,179,352)
(20,977)
240,554
17,673
—
20,629
(28,930)
2,551
373
(247)
148,481
1,094,152
15,306
84,818
(33,619)
118,437
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
87,347
$
100,124
$
84,818
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-7
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS—(Continued)
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$197,262
$ 13,369
$255,243
$ 25,247
$293,715
$ 72,167
Year Ended December 31,
2010
2009
2008
(In thousands)
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Net change in unrealized holding gain on securities available-for-sale, net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustment to initially apply EITF 06-4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustment to initially apply SFAS No. 160 .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Transfers to other real estate owned from loans held for investment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Transfers to other real estate owned from loans held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans transferred to loans held for sale .
Loans to facilitate the sale of other real estate owned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans to facilitate the sale of loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(147)
$ (24,202)
$ 23,872
(147)
$
$ — $ — $
$ — $
$ 98,653
$ 21,473
4,332
$
$ 12,204
$ 23,500
$ —
8,500
$114,354
$ 48,043
$ — $ —
$ —
$ 81,678
$ 21,272
$ —
$ — $ —
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-8
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Cathay General Bancorp (the
“Bancorp”), a Delaware corporation, its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Cathay Bank (the “Bank”), a California
state-chartered bank, six limited partnerships investing in affordable housing projects, and GBC Venture Capital,
Inc. (together, the “Company”). All significant inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated in
consolidation. The consolidated financial statements of the Company are prepared in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and general practices within the banking
industry.
Organization and Background. The business activities of the Bancorp consist primarily of the operations of
the Bank, which owns 100% of the common securities of the following subsidiaries: Cathay Real Estate
Investment Trust, GBC Real Estate Investments, Inc., GB Capital Trust II, Cathay Holdings LLC, Cathay
Holdings 2, LLC, Cathay Holdings 3, LLC, Cathay Community Development Corporation and its wholly owned
subsidiary, Cathay New Asia Community Development Corporation. The Bank liquidated its wholly owned
subsidiary GB Capital Trust II on October 22, 2010.
There are limited operating business activities currently at the Bancorp. The Bank is a commercial bank,
servicing primarily the individuals, professionals, and small to medium-sized businesses in the local markets in
which its branches are located. Its operations include the acceptance of checking, savings, and time deposits, and
the making of commercial, real estate, and consumer loans. The Bank also offers trade financing, letters of credit,
wire transfer, foreign currency spot and forward contracts, Internet banking, investment services, and other
customary banking services to its customers.
Use of Estimates. The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP
requires management of the Company to make a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reported
amount of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. Actual
results could differ from those estimates. The significant estimates subject to change relate to the allowance for
loan losses, goodwill impairment assessment, other-than-temporary impairment analysis on investments, fair
value disclosures, and the fair value of options granted. The more significant of these policies are described
below.
Concentrations. The Bank was incorporated in California and started its business from California.
Therefore, loans originated and deposits solicited were mainly from California. As of December 31, 2010, gross
loans were primarily comprised of 57.4% of commercial mortgage loans and 21.0% of commercial loans. As of
December 31, 2010, approximately 66% of the Bank’s residential mortgages were for properties located in
California. Total deposits were comprised of 45.7% of time deposit of $100,000 or more (Jumbo CDs) at
December 31, 2010, and approximately 57.9% of the Company’s Jumbo CDs have been on deposit with the
Company for two years or more.
Allowance for Loan Losses. The determination of the amount of the provision for loan losses charged to
operations reflects management’s current judgment about the credit quality of the loan portfolio and takes into
consideration changes in lending policies and procedures, changes in economic and business conditions, changes
in the nature and volume of the portfolio and in the terms of loans, changes in the experience, ability and depth of
lending management, changes in the volume and severity of past due, non-accrual and adversely classified or
graded loans, changes in the quality of the loan review system, changes in the value of underlying collateral for
collateral-dependent loans, the existence and effect of any concentrations of credit and the effect of competition,
legal and regulatory requirements, and other external factors. The nature of the process by which loan losses is
F-9
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
determined the appropriate allowance for loan losses requires the exercise of considerable judgment. The
allowance is increased by the provision for loan losses and decreased by charge-offs when management believes
the uncollectibility of a loan is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. A
weakening of the economy or other factors that adversely affect asset quality could result in an increase in the
number of delinquencies, bankruptcies, or defaults, and a higher level of non-performing assets, net charge-offs,
and provision for loan losses in future periods.
The total allowance for loan losses consists of two components: specific allowances and general allowances.
To determine the adequacy of the allowance in each of these two components, two primary methodologies are
employed, the individual loan review analysis methodology and the classification migration methodology. These
methodologies support the basis for determining allocations between the various loan categories and the overall
adequacy of our allowance to provide for probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. These methodologies are
further supported by additional analysis of relevant factors such as the historical losses in the portfolio, and
environmental factors which include trends in delinquency and non-accrual, and other significant factors, such as
the national and local economy, the volume and composition of the portfolio, strength of management and loan
staff, underwriting standards, and the concentration of credit.
The Bank’s management allocates a specific allowance for “Impaired Credits,” in accordance with
Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) Section 310-10-35. For non-Impaired Credits, a general allowance is
established for those loans internally classified and risk graded Pass, Minimally Acceptable, Special Mention, or
Substandard based on historical losses in the specific loan portfolio and a reserve based on environmental factors
determined for that loan group. The level of the general allowance is established to provide coverage for
management’s estimate of the credit risk in the loan portfolio by various loan segments not covered by the
specific allowance.
Securities Purchased Under Agreements to Resell. The Company purchases securities under agreement to
resell with various terms. These agreements are collateralized by agency securities and mortgage backed
securities that are generally held by a third party custodian. The purchases are over-collateralized to ensure
against unfavorable market price movements. In the event that the fair market value of the securities decreases
below the collateral requirements under the related repurchase agreements, the counterparty is required to deliver
additional securities. The counterparties to these agreements are nationally recognized investment banking firms
that meet credit eligibility criteria and with whom a master repurchase agreement has been duly executed.
Securities. Securities are classified as held-to-maturity when management has the ability and intent to hold
these securities until maturity. Securities are classified as available-for-sale when management intends to hold
the securities for an indefinite period of time, or when the securities may be utilized for tactical asset/liability
purposes, and may be sold from time to time to manage interest rate exposure and resultant prepayment risk and
liquidity needs. Securities are classified as trading securities when management intends to sell the securities in
the near term. Securities purchased are designated as held-to-maturity, available-for-sale, or trading securities at
the time of acquisition.
Securities held-to-maturity are stated at cost, adjusted for the amortization of premiums and the accretion of
discounts on a level-yield basis. The carrying value of these assets is not adjusted for temporary declines in fair
value since the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold them to maturity. Securities available-for-sale
are carried at fair value, and any unrealized holding gains or losses are excluded from earnings and reported as a
separate component of stockholders’ equity, net of tax, in accumulated other comprehensive income until
realized. Realized gains or losses are determined on the specific identification method. Premium and discounts
are amortized or accreted as adjustment of yield on a level-yield basis.
F-10
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
ASC Topic 320 requires an entity to assess whether the entity has the intent to sell the debt security or more
likely than not will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. If either of these conditions is
met, an entity must recognize an other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”). If an entity does not intend to sell the
debt security and will not be required to sell the debt security, the entity must consider whether it will recover the
amortized cost basis of the security. If the present value of expected cash flows is less than the amortized cost basis
of the security, OTTI shall have considered to have occurred. OTTI is then separated into the amount of the total
impairment related to credit losses and the amount of the total impairment related to all other factors. An entity
determines the impairment related to credit losses by comparing the present value of cash flows expected to be
collected from the security with the amortized cost basis of the security. OTTI related to the credit loss is then
recognized in earnings. OTTI related to all other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income. OTTI not
related to the credit loss for a held-to-maturity security should be recognized separately in a new category of other
comprehensive income and amortized over the remaining life of the debt security as an increase in the carrying
value of the security only when the entity does not intend to sell the security and it is not more likely than not that
the entity will be required to sell the security before recovery of its remaining amortized cost basis.
Trading securities are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains or losses included in income.
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) Stock. As a member of the FHLB system the Bank is
required to maintain an investment in the capital stock of the FHLB. The amount of investment is also affected
by the outstanding advances under the line of credit the Bank maintains with the FHLB. FHLB stock is carried at
cost and is pledged as collateral to the FHLB. FHLB stock is periodically evaluated for impairment based on
ultimate recovery of par value. The carrying amount of the FHLB stock was $63.9 million at December 31, 2010,
and $71.8 million at December 31, 2009. As of December 31, 2010, 258,500 shares of FHLB stock was the
minimum stock requirement based on outstanding FHLB borrowings of $550.0 million. As of December 31,
2010, the Company owned 638,730 shares of FHLB stock.
Loans. Loans are carried at amounts advanced, less principal payments collected and net deferred loan fees.
Interest is accrued and earned daily on an actual or 360-day basis. Interest accruals on business loans and
non-residential real estate loans are generally discontinued whenever the payment of interest or principal is
90 days or more past due, based on contractual terms. Such loans are placed on non-accrual status, unless the
loan is well secured, and there is a high probability of recovery in full, as determined by management. When
loans are placed on a non-accrual status, previously accrued but unpaid interest is reversed and charged against
current income, and subsequent payments received are generally first applied toward the outstanding principal
balance of the loan. The loan is generally returned to accrual status when the borrower has brought the past due
principal and interest payments current and, in the opinion of management, the borrower has demonstrated the
ability to make future payments of principal and interest as scheduled. A non-accrual loan may also be returned
to accrual status if all principal and interest contractually due are reasonably assured of repayment within a
reasonable period and there has been a sustained period of payment performance, generally six months. Loan
origination fees and commitment fees, offset by certain direct loan origination costs, are deferred and recognized
over the contractual life of the loan as a yield adjustment. The amortization utilizes the interest method. If a loan
is placed on non-accrual status, the amortization of the loan fees and the accretion of discounts are discontinued
until the loan is returned to accruing status.
Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of aggregate cost or fair value. Gains and losses are recorded in
non-interest income based on the difference between sales proceeds, net of sales commissions, and carrying value.
Loans Acquired Through Transfer. Loans acquired through the completion of a transfer, including loans
acquired in a business combination, that have evidence of deterioration of credit quality since origination and for
F-11
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
which it is probable, at acquisition, that the Company will be unable to collect all contractually required payment
receivables are initially recorded at fair value (as determined by the present value of expected future cash flows)
with no valuation allowance. The difference between the undiscounted cash flows expected at acquisition and the
investment in the loan, or the “accretable yield,” is recognized as interest income on a level-yield method over
the life of the loan. Contractually required payments for interest and principal that exceed the undiscounted cash
flows expected at acquisition, or the “nonaccretable difference,” are not recognized as a yield adjustment or as a
loss accrual or a valuation allowance. Increases in expected cash flows subsequent to the initial investment are
recognized prospectively through adjustment of the yield on the loan over its remaining life. Decreases in
expected cash flows are recognized as impairment. Valuation allowance on these impaired loans reflect only
losses incurred after the acquisition.
Impaired Loans. A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all
amounts due (i.e. both principal and interest) according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The
measurement of impairment may be based on (1) the present value of the expected future cash flows of the
impaired loan discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate, (2) the observable market price of the
impaired loan or (3) the fair value of the collateral of a collateral-dependent loan. The amount by which the
recorded investment in the loan exceeds the measure of the impaired loan is recognized by recording a valuation
allowance with a corresponding charge to the provision for loan losses. The Company stratifies its loan portfolio
by size and treats smaller non-performing loans with an outstanding balance based on the Company’s defined
criteria, generally where the loan amount is $500,000 or less, as a homogenous portfolio. Once a loan has been
identified as a possible problem loan, the Company conducts a periodic review of such loan in order to test for
impairment. When loans are placed on an impaired status, previously accrued but unpaid interest is reversed
against current income and subsequent payments received are generally first applied toward the outstanding
principal balance of the loan.
Unfunded Loan Commitments. Unfunded loan commitments are generally related to providing credit
facilities to clients of the Bank, and are not actively traded financial instruments. These unfunded commitments
are disclosed as off-balance sheet financial instruments in Note 14 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Letter of Credit Fees. Issuance and commitment fees received for the issuance of commercial or standby
letters of credit are recognized over the term of the instruments.
Premises and Equipment. Premises and equipment are carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation.
Depreciation is computed on the straight-line method based on the following estimated useful lives of the assets:
Type
Estimated Useful Life
Buildings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Building improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment . . . .
Leasehold improvements . . . . . . . . . . .
15 to 45 years
5 to 20 years
3 to 25 years
Shorter of useful lives or the terms of the leases
Improvements are capitalized and amortized to occupancy expense based on the above table. Construction
in process is carried at cost and includes land acquisition cost, architectural fees, general contractor fees,
capitalized interest and other costs related directly to the construction of a property.
Other Real Estate Owned. Real estate acquired in the settlement of loans is initially recorded at fair value,
less estimated costs to sell. Specific valuation allowances on other real estate owned are recorded through
F-12
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
charges to operations to recognize declines in fair value subsequent to foreclosure. Gains on sales are recognized
when certain criteria relating to the buyer’s initial and continuing investment in the property are met.
Investments in Affordable Housing. The Company is a limited partner in limited partnerships that invest in
low-income housing projects that qualify for Federal and/or State income tax credits. As of December 31, 2010,
six of the limited partnerships in which the Company has an equity interest were determined to be variable
interest entities for which the Company is the primary beneficiary. The Company therefore consolidated the
financial statements of these six limited partnerships into its consolidated financial statements. As further
discussed in Note 7, the partnership interests are accounted for utilizing the equity method of accounting.
Investments in Venture Capital. The Company invests in limited partnerships that invest in nonpublic
companies. These partnerships are commonly referred to as venture capital investments. These limited
partnership interests represent ownership of less than 5% and are carried under the cost method with other-than-
temporary impairment charged against net income.
Goodwill and Goodwill Impairment. Goodwill represents the excess of costs over fair value of assets of
businesses acquired. Goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a purchase business combination and determined
to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized, but instead are tested for impairment at least annually in
accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 350. ASC Topic 350 also requires that intangible assets with
estimable useful lives be amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values,
and reviewed for impairment in accordance with ASC Topic 360, formerly, SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.”
The Company’s policy is to assess goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level on an annual basis or
between annual assessments if a triggering event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not
reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. Impairment is the condition that exists when
the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. Accounting standards require management to
estimate the fair value of each reporting unit in making the assessment of impairment at least annually.
The impairment testing process conducted by the Company begins by assigning net assets and goodwill to
its three reporting units–Commercial Lending, Retail Banking, and East Coast Operations. The Company then
completes “step one” of the impairment test by comparing the fair value of each reporting unit (as determined
based on the discussion below) with the recorded book value (or “carrying amount”) of its net assets, with
goodwill included in the computation of the carrying amount. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its
carrying amount, goodwill of that reporting unit is not considered impaired, and “step two” of the impairment
test is not necessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, step two of the impairment
test is performed to determine the amount of impairment. Step two of the impairment test compares the carrying
amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill to the “implied fair value” of that goodwill. The implied fair value of
goodwill is computed by assuming all assets and liabilities of the reporting unit would be adjusted to the current
fair value, with the offset as an adjustment to goodwill. This adjusted goodwill balance is the implied fair value
used in step two. An impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of goodwill
exceeds its implied fair value.
The Commercial Lending unit did not have any goodwill allocated to the unit and accordingly no goodwill
impairment testing was performed for that unit. The reporting unit fair values for the Retail Banking unit and the
East Coast Operations were determined based on an equal weighting of (1) the fair value determined using a
market approach using a combination of price to earnings multiples determined based on a representative peer
group applied to 2011 and 2012 forecasted earnings, and if appropriate, 2010 net earnings and a price to book
F-13
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
multiple and (2) the fair value determined using a dividend discount model with the discount rate determined
using the same representative peer group. A control premium was then applied to the unit fair values so
determined.
In determining the forecasted earnings for the Retail Banking unit and the East Coast Operations, the
financial forecasts assume muted growth in 2011 and 2012. It should be noted, however, that these reporting
units have already been performing at a satisfactory level given the environment. The principal driver of the
Company’s negative operating results has been the Commercial Lending reporting unit where the vast majority
of the Company’s loan losses are incurred. The forecasts reflect an assumption that interest rates will increase
steadily beginning in the first quarter of 2012 until December 2013. A summary of the respective unit fair value,
carrying amounts and unit goodwill as well as the percentage by which fair value exceed carrying value of each
reporting unit is shown below:
Reporting Units
Carrying
Amount
Fair Value
Fair Value in
Excess of
Carrying
Amount
Commercial Lending Unit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retail Banking Unit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
East Coast Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 566,907
417,845
184,944
(Dollars in thousands)
—
101.9%
37.4%
$ 220,213
843,643
254,201
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$1,169,696
$1,318,057
Allocated
Goodwill
—
235,194
81,146
$316,340
If economic conditions were to worsen instead of improve as assumed in the key assumptions, then the
forecasted earnings for the Retail Banking unit and the East Coast Operations could be significantly lower than
projected. In addition, a worsening of economic conditions could potentially reduce the price to earnings
multiples and price to book multiples of peer groups for Retail Banking and East Coast Operations and result in a
reduction in the fair value of these units even if the forecasted earnings were achieved.
Core Deposit Premium. Core deposit premium, which represents the purchase price over the fair value of
the deposits acquired from other financial institutions, is amortized over its estimated useful life to its residual
value in proportion to the economic benefits consumed. If a pattern of consumption cannot be reliably
determined, straight-line amortization is used. The Company assesses the recoverability of this intangible
asset by determining whether the amortization of the premium balance over its remaining life can be
recovered through the remaining deposit portfolio and amortizes core deposit premium over its estimated
useful life.
At December 31, 2010, the unamortized balance of core deposit premium was $16.4 million, which was net
of accumulated amortization of $44.1 million. Aggregate amortization expense for core deposit premium was
$6.0 million for 2010, $6.6 million for 2009, and $6.9 million for 2008. At December 31, 2010, the estimated
aggregate amortization of core deposit premiums is $5.9 million for 2011, $5.7 million for 2012, $4.5 million for
2013, and $0.4 million for 2014 and thereafter. At December 31, 2009, the unamortized balance of core deposit
premium was $22.4 million, which was net of accumulated amortization of $38.3 million.
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase. The Company sells certain securities under agreements to
repurchase. The agreements are treated as collateralized financing transactions and the obligations to repurchase
securities sold are reflected as a liability in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The securities
underlying the agreements remain in the applicable asset accounts.
F-14
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Stock-Based Compensation. Stock-based compensation expense for stock options is calculated based on the
fair value of the award at the grant date for those options expected to vest, and is recognized as an expense over
the vesting period of the grant using the straight-line method. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option
pricing model to estimate the value of granted options. This model takes into account the option exercise price,
the expected life, the current price of the underlying stock, the expected volatility of the Company’s stock,
expected dividends on the stock and a risk-free interest rate. The Company estimates the expected volatility
based on the Company’s historical stock prices for the period corresponding to the expected life of the stock
options. Option compensation expense totaled $3.0 million in 2010, $5.4 million in 2009, and $7.4 million in
2008. Stock-based compensation is recognized ratably over the requisite service period for all awards.
Unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to stock options totaled $1.9 million at December 31,
2010, and is expected to be recognized over the next 2.0 years.
The weighted average per share fair value of the options granted was $6.86 during 2008 on the date of grant.
No options were granted in 2010 and in 2009. For options granted in 2008, the Company has estimated the
expected life of the options to be 6.5 years based on the average of the contractual period and the vesting period,
except the 100,000 shares granted to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer on February 21, 2008, of which
50% vested on February 21, 2009, and the remaining 50% vested on February 21, 2010. The expected life of the
100,000 shares granted to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer on February 21, 2008 was 5.8 years. Fair value
is determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:
Expected life — number of years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Risk-free interest rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Volatility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividend yield .
2008
6.4
3.09%
30.04%
1.80%
Foreign Exchange Forwards and Foreign Currency Option Contracts. We enter into foreign exchange
forward contracts and foreign currency option contracts with correspondent banks to mitigate the risk of
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates for foreign currency certificates of deposit, foreign exchange
contracts or foreign currency option contracts entered into with our clients. These contracts are not designated as
hedging instruments and are recorded at fair value in our consolidated balance sheets. Changes in the fair value
of these contracts as well as the related foreign currency certificates of deposit, foreign exchange contracts or
foreign currency option contracts, are recognized immediately in net income as a component of non-interest
income. Period end gross positive fair values are recorded in other assets and gross negative fair values are
recorded in other liabilities
Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes is based on income reported for financial statement purposes,
and differs from the amount of taxes currently payable, since certain income and expense items are reported for
financial statement purposes in different periods than those for tax reporting purposes. The Company accounts
for income taxes using the asset and liability approach, the objective of which is to establish deferred tax assets
and liabilities for the temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of the
Company’s assets and liabilities at enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when such amounts are realized or
settled. A valuation allowance is established for deferred tax assets if, based on the weight of available evidence,
it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Comprehensive Income/(loss). Comprehensive income/(loss) is defined as the change in equity during a
period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. Comprehensive income/
(loss) generally includes net income/(loss), foreign currency translation adjustments, minimum pension liability
F-15
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
adjustments, unrealized gains and losses on investments in securities available-for-sale, and cash flow hedges.
Comprehensive income/(loss) and its components are reported and displayed in the Company’s consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive income/(loss).
Net Income per Common Share. Earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed on a basic and diluted basis. Basic
EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted-
average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could
occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or
resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shares in the earnings of the Company. Potential dilution is
excluded from computation of diluted per-share amounts when a net loss from operations exists.
Foreign Currency Translation. The Company considers the functional currency of its foreign operations to
be the United States dollar. Accordingly, the Company remeasures monetary assets and liabilities at year-end
exchange rates, while nonmonetary items are remeasured at historical rates. Income and expense accounts are
remeasured at the average rates in effect during the year, except for depreciation, which is remeasured at
historical rates. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are recognized in income in the period of
occurrence.
Statement of Cash Flows. Cash and cash equivalents include short-term highly-liquid investments that
generally have an original maturity of three months or less.
Segment Information and Disclosures. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America establish standards to report information about operating segments in annual financial statements and
require reporting of selected information about operating segments in interim reports to stockholders. It also
establishes standards for related disclosures about products and services, geographic areas, and major customers.
The Company has concluded it has one operating segment.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The FASB issued ASU 2010-06 “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements” in January 2010
to improve disclosure requirements related to ASC Topic 820. ASU 2010-06 requires an entity to report
separately significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and to explain the
transfers. It also requires an entity to present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and
settlements for Level 3 fair value measurements. ASU 2010-06 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2010. Adoption of ASU 2010-06 did not have a significant impact on its consolidated financial
statements.
The FASB issued ASU 2010-20 “Disclosure about Credit Quality and the Allowance for Credit Losses” in
July 2010 to provide disclosures that facilitate financial statement users’ evaluation of (i) the nature of credit risk
inherent in the entity’s portfolio of financing receivables, (ii) how that risk is analyzed and assessed in arriving at
the allowance for credit losses, and (iii) the changes and reasons for those changes in the allowance for credit
losses. An entity should provide disclosures on two levels of disaggregation- portfolio segment and class of
financing receivable. The disclosure requirements include, among other things, a roll-forward schedule of the
allowance for credit losses as well as information about modified, impaired, non-accrual and past due loans and
credit quality indicators. ASU 2010-20 was effective for the entity’s financial statements as of December 31,
2010, as related to end of a reporting period disclosure requirement. Disclosures that relate to activity during a
reporting period will be required for the entity’s financial statements that include periods beginning on or after
January 1, 2011. See Note 5 to these Consolidated Financial Statements for the required disclosures at
December 31, 2010.
F-16
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
2. Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company manages its cash and cash equivalents, which consist of cash on hand, amounts due from
banks, federal funds sold, and short-term investments with original maturity of three months or less, based upon
the Company’s operating, investment, and financing activities. For the purpose of reporting cash flows, these
same accounts are included in cash and cash equivalents.
The Company is required to maintain reserves with the Federal Reserve Bank. Reserve requirements are
based on a percentage of deposit liabilities. The average reserve balances required were $16.1 million for 2010
and $13.6 million for 2009.
There were no federal funds sold in 2010. The following table sets forth information with respect to federal
funds sold in 2009:
Balance, December 31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Annualized weighted-average interest rate, December 31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Daily average amount outstanding during the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted-average interest rate for the year
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Maximum amount outstanding at any month end . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2009
(In thousands)
$ —
0.00%
$ 35,808
0.13%
$110,000
3. Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell
Securities purchased under agreements to resell are usually collateralized by U.S. government agency and
mortgage-backed securities. The counter-parties to these agreements are nationally recognized investment
banking firms that meet credit requirements of the Company and with whom a master repurchase agreement has
been duly executed. As of December 31, 2010, the Company has one resale agreement of $110.0 million at the
rate of 0.2% which will mature on March 9, 2011.
The following table sets forth information with respect to securities purchased under resell agreements.
Balance, December 31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Annualized weighted-average interest rate, December 31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Daily average amount outstanding during the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted-average interest rate for the year
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Maximum amount outstanding at any month end . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2010
2009
(In thousands)
$110,000
$ —
$
0.20%
6,932
0.20%
0.00%
$ 22,674
5.75%
$110,000
$150,000
For those securities obtained under the resale agreements, the collateral is either held by a third party
custodian or by the counter party and is segregated under written agreements that recognize the Company’s
interest in the securities. Interest income associated with securities purchased under resale agreements was
$14,000 for 2010, $1.3 million for 2009, and $14.7 million for 2008.
F-17
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
4. Investment Securities
Investment Securities. The following table reflects the amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross
unrealized losses, and fair values of investment securities as of December 31, 2010, and December 31, 2009:
At December 31, 2010
Securities Held-to-Maturity
U.S. government sponsored entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and municipal securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mortgage-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other securities-foreign organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total securities held-to-maturity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In thousands)
Fair Value
$
99,921
130,107
600,107
9,967
$ 840,102
$ 2,639
—
5,230
—
$ 7,869
$ — $ 102,560
121,161
603,684
9,954
$ 837,359
8,946
1,653
13
$10,612
Securities Available-for-Sale
U.S. treasury securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
U.S. government sponsored entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and municipal securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mortgage-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Collateralized mortgage obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Asset-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mutual fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Preferred stock of government sponsored entities . . . . . . . . . .
Trust preferred securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other securities-foreign organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total securities available-for-sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total investment securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 125,573
830,269
1,875
627,574
24,719
245
336,476
4,000
569
14,549
38,013
1,468
$2,005,330
$2,845,432
1,653
$ — $ 6,745
6,840
157
123
115
5
5,792
73
—
170
646
—
14,854
590
—
1,307
—
150
58
67
224
$18,903
$26,772
$20,666
$31,278
$ 118,828
825,082
1,718
642,305
25,194
240
331,991
3,927
719
14,437
37,434
1,692
$2,003,567
$2,840,926
At December 31, 2009
Securities Held-to-Maturity
U.S. government sponsored entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mortgage-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total securities held-to-maturity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities Available-for-Sale
U.S. treasury securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
U.S. government sponsored entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and municipal securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mortgage-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Collateralized mortgage obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Asset-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Preferred stock of government sponsored entities . . . . . . . . . .
Other securities-foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total securities available-for-sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total investment securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
99,876
535,139
$ 635,015
$ 1,187
—
$ 1,187
$ — $ 101,063
527,845
$ 628,908
7,294
$ 7,294
$
13,825
873,290
12,750
1,939,821
49,161
312
10,246
1,061
14,975
1,050
$2,916,491
$3,551,506
$ — $
1,284
109
9,730
266
—
—
211
—
—
77
3,230
36
7,375
1,638
63
489
—
84
—
$11,600
$12,787
$12,992
$20,286
$
13,748
871,344
12,823
1,942,176
47,789
249
9,757
1,272
14,891
1,050
$2,915,099
$3,544,007
F-18
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The amortized cost and fair value of investment securities at December 31, 2010, by contractual maturities
are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right
to call or repay obligations with or without call or repayment penalties.
Securities Available-for-Sale
Securities Held-to-Maturity
Amortized Cost
Fair Value
Amortized Cost
Fair Value
(In thousands)
Due in one year or less . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Due after one year through five years . . . . . . . . . . . .
Due after five years through ten years . . . . . . . . . . .
Due after ten years (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 110,567
548,659
781,046
565,058
$ 110,978
543,533
773,968
575,088
$ —
99,921
16,202
723,979
Total
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$2,005,330
$2,003,567
$840,102
$ —
102,561
15,893
718,905
$837,359
(1) Equity securities are reported in this category
Proceeds from sales and repayments of mortgage-backed securities were $1.35 billion during 2010,
$2.76 billion during 2009, and $1.90 billion during 2008. Proceeds from sales and repayments of other
investment securities were $65.1 million during 2010, $51.7 million during 2009, and $651.4 million during
2008. Proceeds from maturity and call of investment securities were $2.88 billion during 2010, $1.43 billion
during 2009, and $1.06 billion during 2008. In 2010, gains of $19.3 million and losses of $67,000 were realized
on sales and calls of investment securities compared with $56.5 million in gains and $9,000 in losses realized in
2009, and $29.4 million in gains and $6,000 in losses realized in 2008.
The temporarily impaired securities represent 45.3% of the fair value of investment securities as of
December 31, 2010. Unrealized losses for securities with unrealized losses for less than twelve months represent
2.4%, and securities with unrealized losses for twelve months or more represent 2.1%, of the historical cost of
these securities. Unrealized losses on these securities generally resulted from increases in interest rate spreads
subsequent to the date that these securities were purchased. All of these securities were investment grade as of
December 31, 2010. At December 31, 2010, 9 issues of securities had unrealized losses for 12 months or longer
and 184 issues of securities had unrealized losses of less than 12 months.
At December 31, 2010, management believed the impairment was temporary and, accordingly, no
impairment loss has been recognized in our consolidated statements of operations. The Company expects to
recover the amortized cost basis of its debt securities, and has no intent to sell and will not be required to sell
available-for-sale debt securities that have declined below their cost before their anticipated recovery.
F-19
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The table below shows the fair value, unrealized losses, and number of issuances of the temporarily
impaired securities in our investment securities portfolio as of December 31, 2010, and December 31, 2009:
Temporarily Impaired Securities
As of December 31, 2010
Less than 12 months
12 months or longer
Total
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
No. of
Issuances
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
No. of
Issuances
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
No. of
Issuances
(Dollars in thousands)
Securities Held-to-Maturity
State and municipal securities
Mortgage-backed securities . . . . . .
Other securities-foreign
$ 121,161
89,439
$ 8,946
1,653
organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9,954
13
122
2
1
$ —
—
—
$—
—
—
Total securities
held-to-maturity . . . . . . . . . $ 220,554
$10,612
125
$ —
$—
Securities Available-for-Sale
U.S. treasury entities . . . . . . . . . . . $ 118,828
U.S. government sponsored
$ 6,745
5
$ —
$—
entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and municipal securities . . . .
Mortgage-backed securities . . . . . .
Mortgage-backed
578,118
1,718
354
6,840
157
4
securities-Non-agency . . . . . . . .
—
—
Collateralized mortgage
obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Asset-backed securities . . . . . . . . .
Corporate bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mutual fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trust preferred securities . . . . . . . .
Other securities-foreign
—
—
283,376
3,927
10,384
—
—
5,792
73
170
organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
27,254
646
Total securities
12
2
7
—
—
—
27
1
2
3
—
—
32
10,127
887
240
—
—
—
—
—
—
1
118
115
5
—
—
—
—
available-for-sale . . . . . . . . $1,023,959
$20,427
Total investment securities . . . . . . $1,244,513
$31,039
59
184
$11,286
$11,286
$239
$239
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1
3
4
1
9
9
—
—
—
—
$ 121,161
89,439
$ 8,946
1,653
9,954
13
122
2
1
$ 220,554
$10,612
125
$ 118,828
$ 6,745
578,118
1,718
386
6,840
157
5
10,127
118
887
240
283,376
3,927
10,384
115
5
5,792
73
170
27,254
646
5
12
2
8
3
4
1
27
1
2
3
$1,035,245
$20,666
$1,255,799
$31,278
68
193
F-20
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Temporarily Impaired Securities
As of December 31, 2009
Less than 12 months
12 months or longer
Total
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
No. of
Issuances
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
No. of
Issuances
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
No. of
Issuances
(Dollars in thousands)
Securities Held-to-Maturity
Mortgage-backed securities . . . . . . $ 527,845
$ 7,294
12
$ — $ —
Total securities
held-to-maturity . . . . . . . . . $ 527,845
$ 7,294
12
$ — $ —
Securities Available-for-Sale
U.S. Treasury entities . . . . . . . . . . $
U.S. government sponsored
entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and municipal securities . . . .
Mortgage-backed securities . . . . . .
Mortgage-backed
13,748
$
77
408,888
—
1,050,968
3,230
—
6,216
securities-Non-agency . . . . . . . .
—
Collateralized mortgage
obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Asset-backed securities . . . . . . . . .
Corporate bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other securities-foreign
30,870
—
249
organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
14,891
—
955
—
1
84
Total securities available-for-
sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,519,614
10,563
Total investment securities . . . . . . $2,047,459
$17,857
2
9
—
32
—
—
4
1
3
51
63
$ — $ —
—
659
855
—
36
3
12,302
1,156
8,304
249
9,508
—
683
63
488
—
—
—
—
—
1
5
3
8
1
3
$ 527,845
$ 7,294
$ 527,845
$ 7,294
$
13,748
$
77
408,888
659
1,051,823
3,230
36
6,219
12,302
1,156
39,174
249
9,757
1,638
63
489
—
14,891
84
12
12
2
9
1
37
3
12
1
4
3
72
84
31,877
2,429
$31,877
$2,429
21
21
1,551,491
12,992
$2,079,336
$20,286
Investment securities having a carrying value of $1.80 billion at December 31, 2010, and $1.97 billion at
December 31, 2009, were pledged to secure public deposits, other borrowings, treasury tax and loan, Federal
Home Loan Bank advances, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and foreign exchange transactions.
5. Loans
Most of the Company’s business activity is predominately with Asian customers located in Southern and
Northern California; New York City; Houston and Dallas, Texas; Seattle, Washington; Boston, Massachusetts;
Chicago, Illinois; and Edison, New Jersey. The Company has no specific industry concentration, and generally its
loans are collateralized with real property or other pledged collateral of the borrowers. Loans are generally
expected to be paid off from the operating profits of the borrowers, refinancing by another lender, or through sale
by the borrowers of the secured collateral.
F-21
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The components of loans in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2010, and December 31,
2009, were as follows:
Type of Loans:
Commercial loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Real estate construction loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial mortgage loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Residential mortgage loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity lines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Installment and other loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less:
Allowance for loan losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unamortized deferred loan fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total loans and leases, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2010
2009
(In thousands)
$1,441,167
409,986
3,940,061
852,454
208,876
16,077
6,868,621
$1,307,880
626,087
4,065,155
682,291
195,975
21,754
6,899,142
(245,231)
(7,621)
$6,615,769
(211,889)
(8,339)
$6,678,914
Loans held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
2,873
$
54,826
In 2010, the Company sold six held for sale loans of $31.7 million with net gains of $779,000, transferred
seven loans of $21.5 million to OREO, wrote down $2.9 million loans held for sale based on their market value,
and added four new loans of $4.3 million which were sold subsequently. Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale
during 2010 were $10.9 million in cash and a new loan of $20.8 million to one of the note purchasers. In
December 2009, the Company transferred ten non-accrual loans of $54.8 million from loans for investment to
loans held for sale and recorded a write-down of $14.5 million to allowance for loan losses.
The Company pledged real estate loans of $2.4 billion at December 31, 2010, and $2.0 billion at
December 31, 2009, to the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco under its specific pledge program. In
addition, the Bank pledged $286.6 million at December 31, 2010, and $465.9 million at December 31, 2009, of
its commercial loans to the Federal Reserve Bank’s Discount Window under the Borrower-in-Custody program.
Loans serviced for others as of December 31, 2010, totaled $175.7 million and were comprised of
$31.2 million of commercial loans, $92.6 million of commercial real estate loans, $7.8 million in construction
loans, and $44.1 million of residential mortgages.
The Company has entered into transactions with its directors, executive officers, or principal holders of its
equity securities, or the associates of such persons (“Related Parties”). Such transactions were made in the
ordinary course of business on substantially the same terms and conditions, including interest rates and collateral,
as those prevailing at the same time for comparable transactions with customers who are not related parties. In
management’s opinion, these transactions did not involve more than normal credit risk or present other
unfavorable features. All loans to Related Parties were current as of December 31, 2010. An analysis of the
activity with respect to loans to Related Parties for the years indicated is as follows:
Balance at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additional loans made . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payment received . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$139,194
52,809
(57,842)
$134,161
$138,319
81,047
(80,172)
$139,194
December 31,
2010
2009
(In thousands)
F-22
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The Company identified impaired loans with a recorded investment of $382.0 million at December 31,
2010, compared to $390.5 million at December 31, 2009. The average balance of impaired loans was
$370.6 million in 2010 and $359.6 million in 2009. We considered all non-accrual loans to be impaired. Interest
recognized on impaired loans totaled $10.0 million in 2010 and $11.1 million in 2009. The Bank recognizes
interest income on impaired loans based on its existing method of recognizing interest income on non-accrual
loans. For impaired loans, the amounts previously charged off represent 23.3% at December 31, 2010, and 20.6%
at December 31, 2009, of the contractual balances for impaired loans. The following table presents impaired
loans and the related allowance and charge-off as of the dates indicated:
Impaired Loans
At December 31, 2010
At December 31, 2009
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
Recorded
Investment Allowance
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
Recorded
Investment Allowance
(Dollars in thousands)
With no allocated allowance
Commercial loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 41,233 $ 27,775 $ — $ 21,860 $ 14,712 $ —
—
Real estate construction loans . . . . . . . . . .
—
Commercial mortgage loans . . . . . . . . . . .
—
Residential mortgage and equity lines . . . .
—
42,913
— 207,655
5,251
—
102,186
211,717
7,823
31,805
186,638
5,110
64,274
156,305
7,436
Subtotal
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $362,959 $255,790 $ — $277,679 $238,265 $ —
With allocated allowance
Commercial loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 13,930 $
Real estate construction loans . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial mortgage loans . . . . . . . . . . .
Residential mortgage and equity lines . . . .
15,429
98,593
9,811
7,748 $ 2,925 $ 33,503 $ 24,055 $ 6,557
4,649
101,195
13,416
3,506
72,893
96,449
421
6,397
8,589
76,583
46,705
4,853
7,470
3,812
978
Subtotal
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $137,763 $126,202 $15,185 $213,988 $152,196 $15,133
Total impaired loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $500,722 $381,992 $15,185 $491,667 $390,461 $15,133
The following is a summary of non-accrual loans as of December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 and the related
net interest foregone for the years then ended:
Non-accrual portfolio loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-accrual loans held-for-sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$242,319
2,873
2010
2009
(In thousands)
$280,643
54,826
2008
$181,202
—
Total non-accrual loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$245,192
$335,469
$181,202
Contractual interest due . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest recognized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 17,304
4,853
$ 23,746
9,830
$ 14,043
8,782
Net interest foregone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 12,451
$ 13,916
$
5,261
F-23
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following table presents the aging of the loan portfolio by type as of December 31, 2010 and as of
December 31, 2009:
As of December 31, 2010
30-59 Days
Past Due
60-89 Days
Past Due
Greater
than 90
Days Past
Due
Non-accrual
Loans
Total Past Due
Loans Not
Past Due
Total
(In thousands)
Type of Loans:
Commercial loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Real estate construction loans . . . . .
Commercial mortgage loans . . . . . .
Residential mortgage loans . . . . . . .
Installment and other loans . . . . . . .
7,037
14,634
12,569
9,934
—
$ 2,990
15,425
9,430
2,581
—
$ —
4,175
831
—
—
$ 31,498
53,937
144,596
12,288
—
$ 41,525
88,171
167,426
24,803
—
$1,399,642 $1,441,167
409,986
3,940,061
1,061,330
16,077
321,815
3,772,635
1,036,527
16,077
Total loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 44,174
$30,426
$5,006
$242,319
$321,925
$6,546,696 $6,868,621
As of December 31, 2009
30-59 Days
Past Due
60-89 Days
Past Due
Greater
than 90
Days Past
Due
Non-accrual
Loans
Total Past Due
Loans Not
Past Due
Total
(In thousands)
Type of Loans:
Commercial loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 21,608
976
Real estate construction loans . . . . .
77,559
Commercial mortgage loans . . . . . .
5,618
Residential mortgage loans . . . . . . .
32
Installment and other loans . . . . . . .
$36,824
4,306
2,232
4,930
—
Total loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $105,793
$48,292
$ —
—
—
—
—
$ —
$ 26,570
91,287
153,308
9,478
—
$ 85,002
96,569
233,099
20,026
32
$1,222,878 $1,307,880
626,087
4,065,155
878,266
21,754
529,518
3,832,056
858,240
21,722
$280,643
$434,728
$6,464,414 $6,899,142
F-24
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
A troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) is a formal modification of the terms of a loan when the lender, for
economic or legal reasons related to the borrower’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to the borrower.
The concessions may be granted in various forms, including reduction in the stated interest rate, reduction in the
loan balance or accrued interest, or extension of the maturity date. Although these loan modifications are
considered troubled debt restructurings, accruing TDR loans have, pursuant to the Bank’s policy, performed
under the restructured terms and have demonstrated sustained performance under the modified terms for six
months before being returned to accrual status. The sustained performance considered by management pursuant
to its policy includes the periods prior to the modification if the prior performance met or exceeded the modified
terms. This would include cash paid by the borrower prior to the restructure to set up interest reserves. A
summary of TDRs by type of concession and by type of loans is shown below:
As of December 31, 2010
Principal
Deferral
Rate
Reduction
Rate Reduction
and Forgiveness
of Principal
Rate Reduction
and Payment
Deferral
Total
(In thousands)
Accruing TDRs
Commercial loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial mortgage loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Residential mortgage loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 1,131
17,338
2,658
$ 1,780
87,411
599
Total accruing TDRs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$21,127
$89,790
$ —
3,459
—
$3,459
$ 1,114
20,831
479
$22,424
$
4,025
129,039
3,736
$136,800
As of December 31, 2010
Interest
Deferral
Principal
Deferral
Rate
Reduction
Rate Reduction
and Payment
Deferral
Total
(In thousands)
Non-accrual TDRs
Commercial mortgage loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Residential mortgage loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 1,239
340
$21,156
1,037
Total non-accrual TDRs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 1,579
$22,193
$2,310
—
$2,310
$ 1,113
951
$ 2,064
$ 25,818
2,328
$ 28,146
As of December 31, 2009
Interest
Deferral
Principal
Deferral
Rate
Reduction
Rate Reduction
and Forgiveness
of Principal
Total
(In thousands)
Accruing TDRs
Commercial mortgage loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Residential mortgage loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 8,864
—
$34,231
485
Total accruing TDRs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 8,864
$34,716
$ 863
—
$ 863
$10,549
—
$10,549
$ 54,507
485
$ 54,992
As of December 31, 2009
Interest
Deferral
Principal
Deferral
Rate
Reduction
Rate Reduction
and Payment
Deferral
Total
(In thousands)
Non-accrual TDRs
Commercial mortgage loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 5,764
$ 9,322
Total non-accrual TDRs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 5,764
$ 9,322
$8,886
$8,886
$17,637
$17,637
$ 41,609
$ 41,609
F-25
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Troubled debt restructurings on accrual status totaled $136.8 million at December 31, 2010, and were
comprised of 28 loans, an increase of $81.8 million, compared to 14 loans totaling $55.0 million at December 31,
2009. TDRs at December 31, 2010, were comprised of eight retail shopping and commercial use buildings of
$64.4 million, six office and commercial use buildings of $20.8 million, three multi-family residential loans of
$21.4 million, two hotel loans of $15.4 million, four single family residential loan of $10.5 million, three land
loans of $2.5 million, and two commercial loans of $1.8 million. TDR’s at December 31, 2009, were comprised
of four office and commercial use buildings of $28.3 million, three multi-family residential loans of
$11.6 million, a hotel loan of $10.3 million, two land loans of $2.3 million, three shopping center loans of
$2.1 million and a single family residential loan of $485,000.
As of December 31, 2010, there were no commitments to lend additional funds to those borrowers whose
loans have been restructured, were considered impaired, or were on non-accrual status.
As part of the on-going monitoring of the credit quality of our loan portfolio, the Company utilizes a risk
grading matrix to assign a risk grade to each loan. The risk rating categories can be generally described by the
following grouping for non-homogeneous loans:
• Pass/Watch – These loans range from minimal credit risk to lower than average, but still acceptable,
credit risk.
•
•
Special Mention – Borrower is fundamentally sound and loan is currently protected but adverse trends
are apparent, that if not corrected, may affect ability to repay. Primary source of loan repayment
remains viable but there is increasing reliance on collateral or guarantor support.
Substandard – These loans are inadequately protected by current sound worth, paying capacity or
pledged collateral. Well-defined weaknesses exist that could jeopardize repayment of debt. Loss may
not be imminent, but if weaknesses are not corrected, there is a good possibility of some loss.
• Doubtful – The possibility of loss is extremely high, but due to identifiable and important pending
events (which may strengthen the loan) a loss classification is deferred until the situation is better
defined.
• Loss – These loans are considered uncollectible and of such little value that to continue to carry the
loan as an active asset is no longer warranted.
The following table presents loan portfolio by risk rating as of December 31, 2010, and as of December 31,
2009:
Pass/Watch
Special Mention
Substandard Doubtful
Total
As of December 31, 2010
(In thousands)
Commercial loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Real estate construction loans . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial mortgage loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Residential mortgage and equity lines . . . . . .
Installment and other loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$1,258,537
191,455
3,365,040
1,026,216
15,535
$ 58,189
53,172
143,974
6,109
542
$118,670
153,857
431,047
28,846
—
$ 5,771
11,502
—
159
—
$1,441,167
409,986
3,940,061
1,061,330
16,077
Total gross loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5,856,783
$261,986
$732,420
$17,432
6,868,621
Loans held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
—
F-26
$ —
$
2,873
$ — $
2,873
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
As of December 31, 2009
Pass/Watch
Special
Mention
Substandard Doubtful
Total
Commercial loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Real estate construction loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial mortgage loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Residential mortgage and equity lines . . . . . . . . . .
Installment and other loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$1,046,983
303,481
3,438,329
859,945
21,754
$ 97,844
97,966
245,901
816
—
(In thousands)
$155,000
219,779
379,128
17,255
—
$ 8,053
4,861
1,797
250
—
$1,307,880
626,087
4,065,155
878,266
21,754
Total gross loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5,670,492
$442,527
$771,162
$14,961
6,899,142
Loans held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
— $ — $ 54,826
$ — $
54,826
The allowance for loan losses and the reserve for off-balance sheet credit commitments are significant
estimates that can and do change based on management’s process in analyzing the loan portfolio and on
management’s assumptions about specific borrowers, underlying collateral, and applicable economic and
environmental conditions, among other factors.
The following table presents the balance in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment and based on
impairment method as of December 31, 2010 and as of December 31, 2009.
Commercial
Loans
Real Estate
Construction
Loans
Commercial
Mortgage
Loans
Residential
mortgage
and equity line
Consumer
and Other
Total
(In thousands)
December 31, 2010
Loans individually evaluated for
impairment
Allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
2,540
33,555
$
7,470
$ 77,691
$
3,106
$ 248,059
$
$
Loans collectively evaluated for
impairment
— $ — $
13,116
$ — $ 366,740
7,435
Allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
61,379
Balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,407,612
$ 35,791
$332,295
$ 125,241
$3,692,002
$
9,668
$1,053,895
$
36 $ 232,115
$16,077 $6,501,881
Total allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
63,919
Total balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,441,167
$ 43,261
$409,986
$ 128,347
$3,940,061
$
9,668
$1,061,330
$
36 $ 245,231
$16,077 $6,868,621
December 31, 2009
Loans individually evaluated for
impairment
Allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
6,521
38,636
$
4,649
$108,188
$
3,499
$ 233,283
$
$
421
9,963
$ — $
15,090
$ — $ 390,070
Loans collectively evaluated for
impairment
Allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
51,294
Balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,269,244
$ 40,437
$517,899
$
96,995
$3,831,872
$
8,059
$ 868,303
$
14 $ 196,799
$21,754 $6,509,072
Total allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
57,815
Total balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,307,880
$ 45,086
$626,087
$ 100,494
$4,065,155
$
8,480
$ 878,266
$
14 $ 211,889
$21,754 $6,899,142
F-27
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following table details activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the years ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009. Allocation of a portion of the allowance to one category of loans does not preclude
its availability to absorb losses in other categories.
Commercial
Loans
Real Estate
Construction
Loans
Commercial
Mortgage
Loans
Residential
mortgage
and equity
line
Installment
and Other
Loans
Total
(In thousands)
2009 Beginning Balance . . . . . . . . .
$ 44,508
$ 39,820
$ 35,060
$ 2,678
$ 27
$ 122,093
Provision for possible loan losses . .
Charge-offs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Recoveries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net Charge-offs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
71,773
(59,370)
904
(58,466)
97,401
(93,275)
1,140
(92,135)
129,573
(64,910)
771
(64,139)
10,408
(4,988)
382
(4,606)
2009 Ending Balance . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 57,815
$ 45,086
$100,494
$ 8,480
Reserve to impaired loans . . . . . . . .
Reserve to non-impaired loans . . . . .
Reserve for off-balance sheet credit
$ 6,557
$ 51,258
$ 4,649
$ 40,437
$
3,506
$ 96,988
$
421
$ 8,059
commitments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 1,692
$ 3,361
$
114
$
38
2010 Beginning Balance . . . . . . . . .
$ 57,815
$ 45,086
$100,494
$ 8,480
Provision for possible loan losses . .
Charge-offs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Recoveries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net Charge-offs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
23,001
(21,609)
4,712
(16,897)
37,495
(45,321)
6,001
(39,320)
96,217
(69,891)
1,527
(68,364)
3,048
(1,934)
74
(1,860)
2010 Ending Balance . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 63,919
$ 43,261
$128,347
$ 9,668
Reserve to impaired loans . . . . . . . .
Reserve to non-impaired loans . . . . .
Reserve for off-balance sheet credit
$ 2,925
$ 60,994
$ 7,470
$ 35,791
$
3,812
$124,535
$
978
$ 8,690
(30)
(4)
21
17
$ 14
$—
$ 14
$
2
$ 14
9
—
13
13
$ 36
$—
$ 35
309,125
(222,547)
3,218
(219,329)
$ 211,889
$ 15,133
$ 196,756
$
5,207
$ 211,889
159,770
(138,755)
12,327
(126,428)
$ 245,231
$ 15,185
$ 230,045
commitments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
691
$ 1,505
$
103
$
36
$
2
$
2,337
An analysis of the activity in the allowance for credit losses for the year ended 2010, 2009, and 2008 is as
follows:
December 31,
2010
2009
2008
(In thousands)
Allowance for Loan Losses
Balance at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for credit losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Transfers from/(to) reserve for off-balance sheet credit commitments . . . . . .
Loans charged off . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Recoveries of charged off loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 211,889
156,900
2,870
(138,755)
12,327
$ 122,093
307,000
2,125
(222,547)
3,218
$ 64,983
106,700
(2,756)
(48,683)
1,849
Balance at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 245,231
$ 211,889
$122,093
Reserve for Off-balance Sheet Credit Commitments
Balance at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for credit losses/transfers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
5,207
(2,870)
2,337
$
$
7,332
(2,125)
5,207
$
$
4,576
2,756
7,332
F-28
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
6. Other Real Estate Owned
At December 31, 2010, the net carrying value of other real estate owned increased $6.7 million, or 9.5%, to
$77.7 million from $71.0 million at December 31, 2009. OREO located in California was $55.9 million and was
comprised primarily of seven parcels of land zoned for residential purpose of $14.3 million, six parcels of land
zoned for commercial purpose properties of $8.1 million, two commercial building construction projects of
$4.8 million, three residential construction projects of $9.7 million, eleven office and commercial use buildings
of $18.4 million, three single family residential properties of $605,000. OREO located in Texas was
$12.9 million and was comprised of two residential construction projects of $3.7 million, two commercial use
buildings construction projects of $1.9 million, two parcels of land zoned for residential purpose of $3.6 million,
two multi-family residences of $1.7 million, one parcel of land zoned for commercial purpose of $906,000, three
single family residential properties of $786,000, and an industrial building of $291,000. OREO located in the
state of Washington was $4.3 million and was comprised of two residential construction projects of $1.8 million,
one parcel of land zoned for residential purpose of $1.3 million, a commercial building construction project of
$949,000, and a single family residence of $241,000. OREO located in the state of Nevada was a parcel of land
zoned for residential purpose of $3.3 million. OREO in all other states was $1.3 million and was comprised
primarily of three commercial use properties.
For 2009, OREO located in California was $51.6 million and was comprised primarily of six parcels of land
zoned for residential purpose properties of $17.9 million, three office and commercial use buildings construction
projects of $11.0 million, six office and commercial use buildings of $7.1 million, four retail shopping centers of
$6.3 million, eight single family residential properties of $5.0 million, three multi-family residential properties of
$2.7 million, a multi-family residential construction project of $1.4 million, and a restaurant of $209,000. OREO
located in Texas was comprised of twelve properties, including two multi-family residences of $5.7 million, three
office and commercial use buildings of $4.5 million, two retail stores and shopping centers totaling $1.2 million,
and four single family residential properties of $1.4 million. OREO located in the state of Washington was
$4.3 million and in all other states was $2.4 million.
An analysis of the activity in the valuation allowance for other real estate losses for the years ended on
December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 is as follows:
Balance, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OREO disposal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2010
2009
2008
$ 22,743
20,139
(17,572)
(In thousands)
$ 3,814
28,216
(9,287)
$ 210
3,604
—
Balance, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 25,310
$22,743
$3,814
The following table presents the components of other real estate owned expense for the year ended:
Operating expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net (gain)/loss on transfer and disposal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2010
2009
2008
$ 5,849
20,139
(9,977)
(In thousands)
$ 5,794
28,216
2,065
$1,338
3,604
11
Total other real estate owned expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$16,011
$36,075
$4,953
F-29
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
7. Investments in Affordable Housing
The Company has invested in certain limited partnerships that were formed to develop and operate housing
for lower-income tenants throughout the United States. The Company’s investments in these partnerships were
$88.5 million at December 31, 2010, and $95.9 million at December 31, 2009. At December 31, 2010, and
December 31, 2009, six of the limited partnerships in which the Company has an equity interest were determined
to be variable interest entities for which the Company is the primary beneficiary. The consolidation of these
limited partnerships in the Company’s consolidated financial statements increased total assets and liabilities by
$22.8 million at December 31, 2010, and also by $22.8 million at December 31, 2009. Other borrowings for
affordable housing limited partnerships were $19.1 million at December 31, 2010, and $19.3 million at
December 31, 2009; recourse is limited to the assets of the limited partnerships. Unfunded commitments for
affordable housing limited partnerships of $4.3 million as of December 31, 2010, and $8.1 million as of
December 31, 2009, were recorded under other liabilities.
Each of the partnerships must meet regulatory requirements for affordable housing for a minimum 15-year
compliance period to fully utilize the tax credits. If the partnerships cease to qualify during the compliance
period, the credits may be denied for any period in which the projects are not in compliance and a portion of the
credits previously taken is subject to recapture with interest. The remaining tax credits to be utilized over a
multiple-year period are $52.4 million for Federal and $1.4 million for state at December 31, 2010. The
Company’s usage of tax credits approximated $10.5 million in 2010, $11.1 million in 2009, and $10.0 million in
2008. For the year ended December 31, operations of investments in affordable housing resulted in pretax losses
of $7.6 million for 2010, $7.3 million for 2009, and $7.4 million for 2008. Losses in excess of the Bank’s
investment in two limited partnerships have not been recorded in the Company’s consolidated financial
statements because the Company had fully satisfied all capital commitments required under the respective limited
partnership agreements.
8. Premises and Equipment
Premises and equipment consisted of the following at December 31, 2010, and December 31, 2009:
Land and land improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Building and building improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Furniture, fixtures and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Leasehold improvement
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction in process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: Accumulated depreciation/amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2010
2009
(In thousands)
$ 33,429
73,541
36,621
12,216
902
156,709
47,253
$ 33,429
69,114
31,176
12,109
1,816
147,644
39,009
Premises and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$109,456
$108,635
The amount of depreciation/amortization included in operating expense was $4.6 million in 2010,
$7.7 million in 2009, and $4.2 million in 2008.
F-30
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
9. Deposits
The following table displays deposit balances as of December 31, 2010, and December 31, 2009:
Demand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NOW accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Money market accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Saving accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Time deposits under $100,000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Time deposits of $100,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 930,300
418,703
982,617
385,245
1,081,266
3,193,715
$ 864,551
337,304
943,164
347,724
1,529,954
3,482,343
Total
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$6,991,846
$7,505,040
2010
2009
(In thousands)
Time deposits outstanding as of December 31, 2010, mature as follows.
Expected Maturity Date at December 31,
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Thereafter
Total
(In thousands)
Time deposits, $100,000 and over . .
Other time deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$3,142,878
916,274
$ 33,112
158,296
$17,725
6,486
$— $—
150
60
$4,059,152
$191,408
$24,211
$ 60
$150
$—
—
$—
$3,193,715
1,081,266
$4,274,981
Accrued interest payable on customer deposits was $5.2 million at December 31, 2010, $9.7 million at
December 31, 2009, and $19.3 million at December 31, 2008. The following table summarizes the interest
expense on deposits by account type for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008:
Year Ended December 31,
2010
2009
2008
Interest bearing demand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Money market accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Saving accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Time deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
927
8,733
694
73,808
(In thousands)
1,059
$
13,233
799
118,465
$
1,544
13,581
1,188
161,397
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$84,162
$133,556
$177,710
10. Borrowed Funds
Federal Funds Purchased. The table below provides comparative data for federal funds purchased:
Average amount outstanding during the year (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Maximum amount outstanding at month-end (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance, December 31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rate at year-end . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted-average interest rate for the year .
2009
2008
(Dollars in thousands)
$40,128
$ 8,392
81,000
85,000
—
52,000
N/A
0.27%
0.26%
2.25%
(1) Average balances were computed using daily averages. There were no federal funds purchased during 2010.
(2) Highest month-end balances were April 2009 and June 2008.
F-31
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Securities Sold under Agreements to Repurchase. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase were
$1.6 billion with a weighted average rate of 4.18% at December 31, 2010, compared to $1.6 billion with a
weighted average rate of 4.19% at December 31, 2009. Seventeen floating-to-fixed rate agreements totaling
$900.0 million are with initial floating rates for a period of time ranging from six months to one year, with the
floating rates ranging from the three-month LIBOR minus 100 basis points to the three-month LIBOR minus 340
basis points. Thereafter, the rates are fixed for the remainder of the term, with interest rates ranging from 4.29%
to 5.07%. After the initial floating rate term, the counterparties have the right to terminate the transaction at par
at the fixed rate reset date and quarterly thereafter. Thirteen fixed-to-floating rate agreements totaling
$650.0 million are with initial fixed rates ranging from 1.00% and 3.50% with initial fixed rate terms ranging
from six months to eighteen months. For the remainder of the seven year term, the rates float at 8% minus the
three-month LIBOR rate with a maximum rate ranging from 3.25% to 3.75% and minimum rate of 0.0%. After
the initial fixed rate term, the counterparties have the right to terminate the transaction at par at the floating rate
reset date and quarterly thereafter. At December 31, 2010, there was one short-term securities sold under
agreements to repurchase of $11.0 million at a rate of 0.9% which matured on January 4, 2011, and two callable
agreements of $100.0 million at a weighted rate of 4.77% which will mature in March 2011. Quarterly average
balance for securities sold under agreements to repurchase was $1.6 billion for all quarters in 2010, in 2009 and
in 2008. The table below provides summary data for callable securities sold under agreements to repurchase as of
December 31, 2010:
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
(Dollars in millions)
Fixed-to-floating
Floating-to-fixed
Total
Callable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . All callable at December 31, 2010 All callable at December 31, 2010
Rate type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rate index . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Maximum rate . . . . . . . . . . .
Minimum rate . . . . . . . . . . .
No. of agreements . . . . . . . .
Amount
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted average rate . . . . .
Final maturity . . . . . . . . . . .
Floating Rate
8% minus three month LIBOR
3.75% 3.50% 3.50% 3.25%
0.0%
0.0% 0.0%
3
$150.0
3.75% 3.50% 3.50% 3.25% 4.77% 4.83% 4.54% 5.00%
2014
0.0%
5
$250.0
4
$200.0
2
$100.0
10
$550.0
4
$200.0
1
$ 50.0
1
$ 50.0
Fixed Rate
2017
2011
2014
2014
2012
2015
2015
30
$1,550.0
4.20%
These transactions are accounted for as collateralized financing transactions and recorded at the amount at
which the securities were sold. The Company may have to provide additional collateral for the repurchase
agreements, as necessary. The underlying collateral pledged for the repurchase agreements consists of U.S.
Treasury securities, U.S. government agency security debt, and mortgage-backed securities with a fair value of
$1.7 billion as of December 31, 2010, and $1.8 billion as of December 31, 2009.
The table below provides comparative data for securities sold under agreements to repurchase for the years
indicated:
2010
2009
2008
Average amount outstanding during the year (1) . . . . . . . .
Maximum amount outstanding at month-end (2) . . . . . . . .
Balance, December 31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rate, December 31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted average interest rate for the year . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$1,560,215
1,566,000
1,561,000
(Dollars in thousands)
$1,562,447
1,587,000
1,557,000
$1,554,023
1,610,000
1,610,000
4.18%
4.24%
4.19%
4.17%
3.95%
3.90%
(3) Average balances were computed using daily averages.
(4) Highest month-end balances were September 2010, February 2009, and December 2008.
F-32
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank. Total advances from the FHLB San Francisco decreased
$379.4 million to $550.0 million at December 31, 2010, from $929.4 million at December 31, 2009, primarily
due to prepayments in 2010. As of December 31, 2010, all $550.0 million FHLB advances with weighted rate of
4.43% were puttable but the FHLB had not exercised its right to terminate any of the puttable transactions. The
FHLB has the right to terminate the puttable transactions at par at each three-month anniversary after the first
puttable date. In 2010, the Company prepaid $379.4 million of FHLB advances with a weighted average rate of
4.62% and incurred prepayment penalties totaling $14.3 million.
The following relates to the outstanding advances at December 31, 2010, and 2009:
Maturity
91 days through 365 days . . . . .
1 – 2 years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2 – 4 years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2010
2009
Amount
(In thousands)
Weighted Average
Interest Rate
Amount
(In thousands)
Weighted Average
Interest Rate
$ —
550,000
—
$550,000
—
4.43
—
4.43%
$ 65,000
164,362
700,000
$929,362
3.49%
5.27
4.42
4.50%
Other borrowings from financial institutions. At December 31, 2010, other borrowings from financial
institutions were $8.5 million with a weighted average rate of 0.48%. Other borrowings of $5.9 million will
mature in 2011 and $2.6 million will mature in the first quarter of 2012.
Other Liabilities. On November 23, 2004, the Company entered into an agreement with its Chief Executive
Officer (“CEO”) pursuant to which the CEO agreed to defer any bonus amounts in excess of $225,000 for the
year ended December 31, 2005, until January 1 of the first year following such time as the CEO separates from
the Company. Accordingly, an amount equal to $610,000 was deferred in 2004 and was accrued in other
liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet. The Company agreed to accrue interest on the deferred portion of the
bonus at 7.0% per annum compounded quarterly. The deferred amount will be increased each quarter by the
amount of interest computed for that quarter. Beginning on the tenth anniversary of the agreement, the interest
rate will equal 275 basis points above the prevailing interest rate on the ten-year Treasury Note. Interest of
$62,000 during 2010, $58,000 during 2009, and $54,000 during 2008 was accrued on this deferred bonus. The
balance was $928,000 at December 31, 2010, and $866,000 at December 31, 2009.
11. Capital Resources
On February 1, 2010, the Company sold $132.3 million of new common stock consisting of 15,028,409
shares at an average price of $8.80 per share. Net of issuance costs and fees, this issuance added $124.9 million
to common stockholders’ equity. From November 23, 2009, to December 24, 2009, the Company issued
$12.6 million of new common stock consisting of 1,623,100 shares at an average price of $7.73 per share. Net of
issuance costs and fees, this issuance added $12.0 million to common stockholders’ equity. On October 13, 2009,
the Company issued $81.0 million of new common stock consisting of 8,756,756 shares at an average price of
$9.25 per share. Net of issuance costs and fees, this issuance added $76.0 million to common stockholders’
equity. In September 2009, the Company issued $32.4 million of new common stock consisting of 3,490,000
shares at an average price of $9.28 per share. Net of issuance costs and fees, this issuance added $31.4 million to
common stockholders’ equity.
The Company has participated in the U.S. Treasury Troubled Asset Relief Program Capital Purchase
Program under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008. Upon the approval of participation, the U.S.
F-33
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Treasury purchased the Company’s senior preferred stock on December 5, 2008, in the amount of $258.0 million.
The senior preferred stock pays cumulative compounding dividends at a rate of 5% per year for the first five
years, and thereafter at a rate of 9% per year. The shares are non-voting, other than class voting rights on matters
that could adversely affect the shares. They are callable at par after three years. Prior to the end of three years, the
shares may only be redeemed with the proceeds from one or more qualified equity offerings. In conjunction with
the purchase of senior preferred shares, the U.S. Treasury received warrants to purchase 1,846,374 shares of
common stock at the exercise price of $20.96 with an aggregate market price equal to $38.7 million, 15% of the
senior preferred stock amount that U.S. Treasury invested.
On September 29, 2006, the Bank issued $50.0 million in subordinated debt in a private placement
transaction. The debt has a maturity term of 10 years, is unsecured and bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 110
basis points. As of December 31, 2010, $50.0 million was outstanding with a rate of 1.40% under this note
compared to $50.0 million at a rate of 1.35% at December 31, 2009. Interest expense on the subordinated debt
was $736,000 in 2010, $1.0 million in 2009, and $2.3 million in 2008. The subordinated debt was issued through
the Bank and qualifies as Tier 2 capital for regulatory reporting purpose and is included as a component of long-
term debt in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
The Bancorp established three special purpose trusts in 2003 and two in 2007 for the purpose of issuing trust
preferred securities to outside investors (Capital Securities). The trusts exist for the purpose of issuing the Capital
Securities and investing the proceeds thereof, together with proceeds from the purchase of the common securities
of the trusts by the Bancorp, in Junior Subordinated Notes issued by the Bancorp. Subject to some limitations,
payment of distributions out of the monies held by the trusts and payments on liquidation of the trusts or the
redemption of the Capital Securities are guaranteed by the Bancorp to the extent the trusts have funds on hand at
such time. The obligations of the Bancorp under the guarantees and the Junior Subordinated Notes are
subordinate and junior in right of payment to all indebtedness of the Bancorp and will be structurally
subordinated to all liabilities and obligations of the Bancorp’s subsidiaries. The Bancorp has the right to defer
payments of interest on the Junior Subordinated Notes at any time or from time to time for a period of up to
twenty consecutive quarterly periods with respect to each deferral period. Under the terms of the Junior
Subordinated Notes, the Bancorp may not, with certain exceptions, declare or pay any dividends or distributions
on its capital stock or purchase or acquire any of its capital stock if the Bancorp has deferred payment of interest
on the Junior Subordinated Notes.
The five special purpose trusts are considered variable interest entities under FIN 46R. Because the Bancorp
is not the primary beneficiary of the trusts, the financial statements of the trusts are not included in the
consolidated financial statements of the Company.
The Junior Subordinated Notes are currently included in the Tier 1 capital of the Bancorp for regulatory
capital purposes. On March 1, 2005, the Federal Reserve adopted a final rule that retains trust preferred securities
in the Tier I capital of bank holding companies, which after a five-year transition period, limited the aggregate
amount of trust preferred securities and certain other capital elements to 25% of Tier 1 capital elements, net of
goodwill, less any associated deferred tax liability. The amount of trust preferred securities and certain other
elements in excess of the limit could be included in Tier 2 capital, subject to restrictions. This rule did not have a
materially adverse effect on the Company’s capital positions.
Interest expense on the Junior Subordinated Notes was $3.1 million for 2010, $3.8 million for 2009, and
$6.7 million for 2008.
F-34
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The table below summarizes the outstanding Junior Subordinated Notes issued by the Company to each trust
as of December 31, 2010:
Issuance
Date
Principal
Balance of
Notes
Not
Redeemable
Until
Stated
Maturity
Annualized
Coupon
Rate
Current
Interest
Rate
Date of Rate
Change
Payable/
Distribution
Date
(Dollars in thousands)
Trust Name
Cathay Capital
Trust I . . . . . . . . . . . .
June 26,
2003
$20,619
June 30,
2008
June 30,
2033
Cathay Statutory
Trust I . . . . . . . . . . . . September 17,
20,619
September 17, September 17,
2003
2008
2033
Cathay Capital
Trust II . . . . . . . . . . . December 30,
12,887
2003
March 30,
2009
March 30,
2034
Cathay Capital
Trust III . . . . . . . . . . March 28,
46,392
2007
June 15,
2012
June 15,
2037
3-month
LIBOR
+3.15%
3-month
LIBOR
+3.00%
3-month
LIBOR
+2.90%
3-month
LIBOR
+1.48%
3.45% December 30, March 30
June 30
September 30
December 30
2010
3.30% December 17, March 17
June 17
September 17
December 17
2010
3.20% December 30, March 30
June 30
September 30
December 30
2010
1.78% December 15, March 15
June 15
September 15
December 15
2010
Cathay Capital
Trust IV . . . . . . . . . .
May 31,
2007
20,619
September 6,
2012
September 6,
2037
3-month
LIBOR
1.70% December 6,
2010
1.40%
March 6
June 6
September 6
December 6
Total Junior Subordinated Notes . . . . . .
$121,136
12. Income Taxes
For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, the current and deferred amounts of the income
tax expense are summarized as follows:
2010
2009
2008
(In thousands)
Current:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Federal
State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 16,496
7,379
$(25,226)
429
$ 50,643
19,762
$ 23,875
$(24,797)
$ 70,405
Deferred:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Federal
State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(28,600)
(9,904)
(26,367)
(10,748)
(38,741)
(12,110)
$(38,504)
$(37,115)
$(50,851)
Total income tax (benefit)/expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$(14,629)
$(61,912)
$ 19,554
F-35
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Temporary differences between the amounts reported in the financial statements and the tax basis of assets
and liabilities give rise to deferred taxes. Net deferred tax assets at December 31, 2010, and at December 31,
2009, are included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and are as follows:
Deferred Tax Assets
Loan loss allowance, due to differences in computation of bad debts . . . . . . .
Write-down on equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock option compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-accrual interest
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Write-down on other real estate owned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrealized loss on interest rate swaps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2010
2009
(In thousands)
$122,691
3,714
15,748
1,903
4,004
16,374
2,709
741
3,079
$ 93,470
3,209
14,932
2,883
4,055
9,692
—
517
3,957
Gross deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
170,963
132,715
Deferred Tax Liabilities
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Core deposit intangibles .
Investment in aircraft financing trust and venture capital partnerships .
. . . . .
Dividends on Federal Home Loan Bank common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(6,282)
(21,329)
(4,035)
(4,876)
(36,522)
(2,533)
(8,677)
(18,161)
(5,002)
(4,613)
(36,453)
(3,037)
Net deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$131,908
$ 93,225
Amounts for the current year are based upon estimates and assumptions and could vary from amounts
shown on the tax returns as filed.
In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not
that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax
assets is dependent on the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary
differences become deductible. Management considers the projected future taxable income and tax planning
strategies in making this assessment. Based upon the level of historical taxable income and projections for future
taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes it is more
likely than not the Company will realize all benefits related to these deductible temporary differences except for
$2.5 million of state deferred taxes for a portion of the capital losses related to the Company’s former
investments in the preferred stock of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
As of December 31, 2010, the Company had income tax receivables of approximately $23.50 million, of
which $10.6 million relates to the carryback of the Company’s net operating loss for 2009 to the 2007 tax year
and $10.3 million relates to the carryback of the Company’s low income housing tax credits for 2009 to the 2008
tax year. These income tax receivables are included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets. Other assets included current income taxes receivable of $39.2 million as of December 31, 2009.
At December 31, 2010, the Company had federal net operating loss carry forwards of approximately
$2.7 million which expire through 2022. The Federal net operating loss carry-forwards were acquired in
F-36
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
connection with the Company’s acquisition of United Heritage Bank. Federal and state tax laws related to a
change in ownership place limitations on the annual amount of operating loss carryovers that can be utilized to
offset post-acquisition operating income based on the value of the acquired bank at the ownership change date.
During 2009 the Company accrued $1.0 million for uncertain tax positions, paid $4.8 million of state taxes
previously recorded in unrecognized tax benefits and upon the expiration of applicable status of limitations,
recognized $2.7 million tax benefits through goodwill reduction, and recognized a $1.5 million Federal impact of
state tax payments. During 2010, the Company paid $1.5 million of California income taxes and $0.9 million of
interest upon the completion of the audit of its 2000 to 2002 California income tax returns, recognized
$0.5 million in tax benefits upon the expiration of statutes of limitation and a $0.8 million Federal impact of state
tax payments. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as
follows:
Balance, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Changes based on tax positions related to the current year . . . . . . . . . .
Expiration of statute of limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Federal impact of state payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reductions for tax positions of prior years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2010
2009
(In thousands)
$ 2,593
—
(508)
843
(2,409)
—
$ 7,840
1,037
(2,764)
1,454
(4,844)
(130)
Balance, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
519
$ 2,593
For the year ended December 31, 2009, upon the expiration of the statute of limitations, the Company
reversed $1.1 million of interest and penalties and credited $0.6 million to income tax expense and $0.5 million
to goodwill. During 2009, the Company also paid $0.7 million of accrued interest, net of applicable Federal tax
benefit and accrued interest of $0.1 million. The Company had accrued interest and penalties of $0.1 million at
December 31, 2010, and $0.2 million at December 31, 2009.
The Company’s tax returns are open for audits by the Internal Revenue Service back to 2007 and by the
FTB of the State of California back to 2003. The Company is currently under audit by the Internal Revenue
Service for the years 2007 to 2009 and by the California Franchise Tax Board for the years 2003 to 2004. As the
Company is presently under audit by a number of tax authorities, it is reasonably possible that unrecognized tax
benefits could change significantly over the next twelve months. The Company does not expect that any such
changes would have a material impact on its annual effective tax rate.
Income tax expense results in effective tax rates that differ from the statutory Federal income tax rate for the
years indicated as follows:
Tax provision at Federal statutory rate . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State income taxes, net of Federal income tax
2010
2009
(In thousands)
2008
$ (1,072)
35.0% $(45,042) 35.0% $24,737
35.0%
benefit
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(1,641)
53.5
(6,175)
4.8
4,634
6.6
Interest on obligations of state and political
subdivisions,which are exempt from Federal
taxation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Low income housing and other tax credits . . . . . . . . . .
Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(299)
9.8
(11,220) 366.2
13.0
(397)
(267)
(10,575)
147
0.2
8.2
(0.1)
(427)
(9,535)
145
(0.6)
(13.5)
0.2
Total income tax (benefit)/expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$(14,629) 477.5% $(61,912) 48.1% $19,554
27.7%
F-37
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
13. Stockholders’ Equity and Earnings per Share
As a bank holding company, the Bancorp’s ability to pay dividends will depend upon the dividends it
receives from the Bank and on the income it may generate from any other activities in which it may engage,
either directly or through other subsidiaries.
Under California banking law, the Bank may not, without regulatory approval, pay a cash dividend that
exceeds the lesser of the Bank’s retained earnings or its net income for the last three fiscal years, less any cash
distributions made during that period. Under this regulation, as of January 1, 2011, the Bank does not have any
capacity to pay dividends to the Company without regulatory approval.
During 2003, the Bank formed Cathay Real Estate Investment Trust (“Trust”) to provide the Bank flexibility
in raising capital. In 2003 and 2004, the Trust sold to accredited investors $8.6 million of its 7.0% Series A
Non-Cumulative preferred stock which pays dividends, if declared, at the end of each quarter. This preferred
stock qualifies as Tier 1 capital under current regulatory guidelines. Dividends of $611,000 in 2010, dividends of
$611,000 in 2009, and dividends of $603,000 in 2008 were paid. For the years ended and as of December 31,
2010, December 31, 2009, and December 31, 2008, the net income and assets of the Trust were eliminated in
consolidation.
The Board of Directors of the Bancorp is authorized to issue preferred stock in one or more series and to fix
the voting powers, designations, preferences or other rights of the shares of each such class or series and the
qualifications, limitations, and restrictions thereon. Any preferred stock issued by the Bancorp may rank prior to
the Bancorp common stock as to dividend rights, liquidation preferences, or both, may have full or limited voting
rights, and may be convertible into shares of the Bancorp common stock.
On November 16, 2000, the Bancorp’s Board of Directors adopted a Rights Agreement between the
Bancorp and American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, as Rights Agent, and declared a dividend of one
preferred share purchase right for each outstanding share of the Bancorp common stock. The dividend was
payable on January 19, 2001, to stockholders of record at the close of business on the record date, December 20,
2000. Each preferred share purchase right entitles the registered holder to purchase from the Bancorp one
one-thousandth of a share of the Bancorp’s Series A junior participating preferred stock at a price of $200,
subject to adjustment. In general, the rights become exercisable if, after December 20, 2000, a person or group
acquires 15% or more of the Bancorp’s common stock or announces a tender offer for 15% or more of the
common stock. The Board of Directors is entitled to redeem the rights at one cent per right at any time before any
such person acquires 15% or more of the outstanding common stock. The Rights Agreement expired at the close
of business on November 16, 2010, and was not renewed.
Pursuant to the U.S. Treasury Troubled Asset Relief Program Capital Purchase Program under the
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, on December 5, 2008, the U.S. Treasury purchased 258,000
shares of the Company’s Series B Preferred Stock in the amount of $258.0 million. The Series B Preferred Stock
pays cumulative compounding dividends at a rate of 5% per year for the first five years, and thereafter at a rate of
9% per year. In conjunction with the purchase of senior preferred shares, the U.S. Treasury received warrants to
purchase 1,846,374 shares of common stock at the exercise price of $20.96 per share with an aggregate market
price equal to $38.7 million, or 15%, of the senior preferred stock amount that the U.S. Treasury invested. The
exercise price of $20.96 on warrants was calculated based on the average of closing prices of the Company’s
common stock on the 20 trading days ending on the last trading day prior to November 17, 2008, the date that the
Company received the preliminary approval of the purchase from the U.S. Treasury.
F-38
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following is the reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per
share computations for the years as indicated:
2010
2009
2008
Income
(Numerator)
Shares
(Denominator)
Per
Share
Amount
Income
(Numerator)
Shares
(Denominator)
Per
Share
Amount
Income
(Numerator)
Shares
(Denominator)
Per
Share
Amount
(In thousands, except shares and per share data)
Net
income/(loss) . $ 11,565
Dividends on
preferred
stock . . . . . . . .
Basic EPS (loss)/
(16,388)
$(67,390)
(16,338)
$50,521
(1,140)
income . . . . . . $ (4,823)
77,073,954
$(0.06) $(83,728)
52,629,159
$(1.59)
$49,381
49,414,824
$1.00
Effect of dilutive
stock
options . . . . . .
Diluted EPS
—
—
114,969
(loss)/income . $ (4,823)
77,073,954
$(0.06) $(83,728)
52,629,159
$(1.59)
$49,381
49,529,793
$1.00
All options to purchase an additional 5.0 million shares, restricted stock units on an additional 39,000
shares, and warrants on an additional 1.8 million shares at December 31, 2010 were excluded from computation
of diluted per-share amounts due to the net loss from operations for 2010. All options to purchase an additional
5.2 million shares, restricted stock units to purchase an additional 61,000 shares, and warrants to purchase an
additional 1.8 million shares at December 31, 2009, were excluded from computation of diluted per-share
amounts due to the net loss from operations for 2009. Options to purchase an additional 4.5 million shares and
warrants to purchase an additional 883,000 shares at December 31, 2008 were not included in the computation of
diluted earnings per share because their inclusion would have had an anti-dilutive effect.
14. Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation. The Company is involved in various litigation concerning transactions entered into during the
normal course of business. Management, after consultation with legal counsel, does not believe that the
resolution of such litigation will have a material effect upon its consolidated financial condition, results of
operations, or liquidity taken as a whole.
Lending. In the normal course of business, the Company becomes a party to financial instruments with
off-balance sheet risk to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include
commitments to extend credit in the form of loans or through commercial or standby letters of credit and
financial guarantees. Those instruments represent varying degrees of exposure to risk in excess of the amounts
included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The contractual or notional amount of these
instruments indicates a level of activity associated with a particular class of financial instrument and is not a
reflection of the level of expected losses, if any.
The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the other party to the financial
instrument for commitments to extend credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The
Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for
on-balance sheet instruments. Unless noted otherwise, the Company does not require collateral or other security
to support financial instruments with credit risk.
F-39
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent the amount of credit risk include the following:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commitments to extend credit
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Standby letters of credit
Commercial letters of credit
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bill of lading guarantees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$1,360,266
59,876
62,722
245
$1,591,019
61,488
49,257
300
Total
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$1,483,109
$1,702,064
2010
2009
(In thousands)
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer provided there is no violation of any
condition established in the commitment agreement. These commitments generally have fixed expiration dates
and are expected to expire without being drawn upon. The total commitment amounts do not necessarily
represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case
basis. The amount of collateral obtained if deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit is based
on management’s credit evaluation of the borrowers.
As of December 31, 2010, the Company does not have fixed-rate or variable-rate commitments with
characteristics similar to options, which provide the holder, for a premium paid at inception to the Company, the
benefits of favorable movements in the price of an underlying asset or index with limited or no exposure to losses
from unfavorable price movements.
As of December 31, 2010, commitments to extend credit of $1.4 billion include commitments to fund fixed
rate loans of $44.6 million and adjustable rate loans of $1.3 billion.
Commercial letters of credit and bill of lading guarantees are issued to facilitate domestic and foreign trade
transactions while standby letters of credit are issued to make payments on behalf of customers if certain
specified future events occur. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit and bill of lading guarantees is
essentially the same as that involved in making loans to customers.
Leases. The Company is obligated under a number of operating leases for premises and equipment with
terms ranging from one to 50 years, many of which provide for periodic adjustment of rentals based on changes
in various economic indicators. Rental expense was $6.6 million for 2010, $6.9 million for 2009, and
$7.8 million for 2008. The following table shows future minimum payments under operating leases with terms in
excess of one year as of December 31, 2010.
Year Ending December 31,
2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thereafter
Commitments
(In thousands)
$ 5,764
4,981
4,132
2,994
1,244
1,143
Total minimum lease payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$20,258
F-40
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Rental income was $0.3 million for 2010, $0.3 million for 2009, and $0.5 million for 2008. The following
table shows future rental payments to be received under operating leases with terms in excess of one year as of
December 31, 2010:
Year Ending December 31,
2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thereafter
Commitments
(In thousands)
$ 88
91
93
45
—
Total minimum lease payments to be received . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$317
15. Financial Derivatives
It is the policy of the Company not to speculate on the future direction of interest rates. However, the
Company enters into financial derivatives in order to seek mitigation of exposure to interest rate risks related to
its interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Management believes that these transactions, when
properly structured and managed, may provide a hedge against inherent interest rate risk in the Company’s assets
or liabilities and against risk in specific transactions. In such instances, the Company may protect its position
through the purchase or sale of interest rate futures contracts for a specific cash or interest rate risk position.
Other hedge transactions may be implemented using interest rate swaps, interest rate caps, floors, financial
futures, forward rate agreements, and options on futures or bonds. Prior to considering any hedging activities, we
seek to analyze the costs and benefits of the hedge in comparison to other viable alternative strategies. All hedges
will require an assessment of basis risk and must be approved by the Bank’s Investment Committee.
The Company follows ASC Topic 815 which established accounting and reporting standards for financial
derivatives, including certain financial derivatives embedded in other contracts, and hedging activities. It requires
the recognition of all financial derivatives as assets or liabilities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets
and measurement of those financial derivatives at fair value. The accounting treatment of changes in fair value is
dependent upon whether or not a financial derivative is designated as a hedge and if so, the type of hedge.
As of December 31, 2010, and December 31, 2009, we had five interest rate swap agreements outstanding
with two major financial institutions in the notional amount of $300.0 million for a period of three years. These
interest rate swaps were not structured to hedge against inherent interest rate risks related to our interest-earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities. At December 31, 2010, we paid a fixed rate at a weighted average rate of
1.95% and received a floating 3-month Libor rate at a weighted average rate of 0.30% compared to 0.26% at
December 31, 2009. The net amount accrued on these interest rate swaps of $4.8 million for 2010 was recorded
to reduce other non-interest income compared to $2.4 million for 2009. At December 31, 2010, we recorded
$5.8 million within other liabilities to recognize the negative fair value of these interest rate swaps compared to
$694,000 at December 31, 2009.
We enter into foreign exchange forward contracts and foreign currency option contracts with various
counterparties to mitigate the risk of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, for foreign exchange
certificates of deposit, foreign currency contracts, or foreign currency option contracts entered into with our
clients. These contracts are not designated as hedging instruments and are recorded at fair value in our
consolidated balance sheets. Changes in the fair value of these contracts as well as the related foreign currency
certificates of deposit, foreign exchange contracts, or foreign currency option contracts are recognized
F-41
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
immediately in operations as a component of non-interest income. Period end gross positive fair values are
recorded in other assets and gross negative fair values are recorded in other liabilities. At December 31, 2010, the
notional amount of option contracts totaled $29.3 million with a net positive fair value of $35,000. Spot and
forward contracts in the total notional amount of $112.7 million had positive fair value, in the amount of
$4.6 million, at December 31, 2010. Spot and forward contracts in the total notional amount of $68.4 million had
a negative fair value, in the amount of $1.9 million, at December 31, 2010. At December 31, 2009, the notional
amount of option contracts totaled $4.7 million with a net positive fair value of $10,000. Spot and forward
contracts in the total notional amount of $60.7 million had positive fair value, in the amount of $3.6 million, at
December 31, 2009. Spot and forward contracts in the total notional amount of $60.8 million had a negative fair
value, in the amount of $967,000, at December 31, 2009.
16. Fair Value Measurements
The Company adopted ASC Topic 820 on January 1, 2008, and determined the fair values of our financial
instruments based on the following:
• Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
• Level 2 — Observable prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities; prices for identical or
similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; directly observable market inputs for
substantially the full term of the asset and liability; market inputs that are not directly observable but
are derived from or corroborated by observable market data.
• Level 3 — Unobservable inputs based on the Company’s own judgments about the assumptions that a
market participant would use.
The Company uses the following methodologies to measure the fair value of its financial assets and
liabilities on a recurring basis:
Securities Available for Sale. For certain actively traded agency preferred stocks and U.S. Treasury
securities, the Company measures the fair value based on quoted market prices in active exchange markets at the
reporting date, a Level 1 measurement. The Company also measures securities by using quoted market prices for
similar securities or dealer quotes, a Level 2 measurement. This category generally includes U.S. Government
agency securities, state and municipal securities, mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”), commercial MBS,
collateralized mortgage obligations, asset-backed securities, U.S. Government sponsored enterprise preferred
stock securities, and corporate bonds.
Trading Equity Securities and Mutual Funds. The Company measures the fair value of trading equity
securities and mutual funds based on quoted market prices in active exchange markets at the reporting date, a
Level 1 measurement.
Warrants. The Company measures the fair value of warrants based on unobservable inputs based on
assumption and management judgment, a Level 3 measurement.
Currency Option Contracts and Foreign Exchange Contracts. The Company measures the fair value of
currency option and foreign exchange contracts based on dealer quotes on a recurring basis, a Level 2
measurement.
Interest Rate Swaps. Fair value of interest rate swaps was derived from observable market prices for similar
assets on a recurring basis, a Level 2 measurement.
F-42
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The valuation techniques for the assets and liabilities valued on a nonrecurring basis are as follows:
Impaired Loans. The Company does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. However, from time
to time, nonrecurring fair value adjustments to collateral dependent impaired loans are recorded based on either
the current appraised value of the collateral, a Level 2 measurement, or management’s judgment and estimation
of value reported on old appraisals which are then adjusted based on recent market trends, a Level 3
measurement.
Loans Held for sale. The Company records loans held for sale at fair value based on quoted prices from
third party sale analysis, existing sale agreements, or appraisal reports adjusted by sales commission assumption,
a Level 3 measurement.
Goodwill. The Company completes “step one” of the impairment test by comparing the fair value of each
reporting unit (as determined based on the discussion below) with the recorded book value (or “carrying
amount”) of its net assets, with goodwill included in the computation of the carrying amount. If the fair value of a
reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of that reporting unit is not considered impaired, and “step
two” of the impairment test is not necessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, step
two of the impairment test is performed to determine the amount of impairment. Step two of the impairment test
compares the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill to the “implied fair value” of that goodwill. The
implied fair value of goodwill is computed by assuming all assets and liabilities of the reporting unit would be
adjusted to the current fair value, with the offset as an adjustment to goodwill. This adjusted goodwill balance is
the implied fair value used in step two. An impairment charge is then recognized for the amount by which the
carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. In connection with the determination of fair value,
certain data and information was utilized, including earnings forecast at the reporting unit level for the next four
years. Other key assumptions include terminal values based on future growth rates and discount rates for valuing
the cash flows, which have inputs for the risk-free rate, market risk premium and adjustments to reflect inherent
risk and required market returns. Because of the significance of unobservable inputs in the valuation of goodwill
impairment, goodwill subject to nonrecurring fair value adjustments is classified as Level 3 measurement.
Core Deposit Intangibles. Core deposit intangibles is initially recorded at fair value based on a valuation of
the core deposits acquired and is amortized over its estimated useful life to its residual value in proportion to the
economic benefits consumed. The Company assesses the recoverability of this intangible asset on a nonrecurring
basis using the core deposits remaining at the assessment date and the fair value of cash flows expected to be
generated from the core deposits, a Level 3 measurement.
Other Real Estate Owned. Real estate acquired in the settlement of loans is initially recorded at fair value
based on the appraised value of the property on the date of transfer, less estimated costs to sell, a Level 2
measurement. From time to time, nonrecurring fair value adjustments are made to other real estate owned based
on the current updated appraised value of the property, also a Level 2 measurement, or management’s judgment
and estimation of value reported on old appraisals which are then adjusted based on recent market trends, a Level
3 measurement.
Investments in Venture Capital. The Company periodically reviews for OTTI on a nonrecurring basis.
Investments in venture capital were written down to their fair value based on available financial reports from
venture capital partnerships and management’s judgment and estimation, a Level 3 measurement.
Equity Investments. The Company records equity investments at fair value on a nonrecurring basis based on
quoted market prices in active exchange market at the reporting date, a Level 1 measurement.
F-43
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following table presents the Company’s hierarchy for its assets and liabilities measured at fair value on
a recurring basis at December 31, 2010, and at December 31, 2009:
As of December 31, 2010
Fair Value Measurements Using
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total at
Fair Value
(In thousands)
Assets
Securities available-for-sale
U.S. Treasury securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
U.S. government sponsored entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and municipal securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mortgage-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Collateralized mortgage obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Asset-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mutual fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Preferred stock of government sponsored entities . . . . . . . . .
Trust preferred securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other foreign securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total securities available-for-sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trading securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Warrants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Option contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign exchange contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$118,828
—
—
—
—
—
—
3,927
—
14,437
—
1,692
138,884
23
—
—
—
— $— $ 118,828
825,082
1,718
642,305
25,194
240
331,991
3,927
719
14,437
37,434
1,692
825,082 —
1,718 —
642,305 —
25,194 —
240 —
331,991 —
—
—
719 —
—
—
37,434 —
—
—
1,864,683 —
3,795 —
—
40
106 —
4,629 —
2,003,567
3,818
40
106
4,629
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$138,907
$1,873,213
$ 40
$2,012,160
Liabilities
Interest rate swaps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Option contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign exchange contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ — $
—
—
6,508
$— $
72 —
1,873 —
Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ — $
8,453
$— $
6,508
72
1,873
8,453
F-44
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
As of December 31, 2009
Fair Value Measurements Using
Level 2
Level 1
Level 3
Total at
Fair Value
(In thousands)
Assets
Securities available-for-sale
U.S. Treasury securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
U.S. government sponsored entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and municipal securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mortgage-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Collateralized mortgage obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Asset-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Preferred stock of government sponsored entities . . . . . . . . . .
Other foreign securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total securities available-for-sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trading securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Warrants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Option contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign exchange contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$13,748
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,050
14,798
18
—
—
—
$
— $— $
871,344 —
12,823 —
1,942,176 —
47,789 —
249 —
9,757 —
1,272 —
14,891 —
—
—
2,900,301 —
—
—
—
50
18 —
3,565 —
13,748
871,344
12,823
1,942,176
47,789
249
9,757
1,272
14,891
1,050
2,915,099
18
50
18
3,565
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$14,816
$2,903,884
$ 50
$2,918,750
Liabilities
Interest rate swaps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Option contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign exchange contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ — $
—
—
694
$— $
8 —
967 —
694
8
967
Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ — $
1,669
$— $
1,669
The Company measured the fair value of its warrants on a recurring basis using significant unobservable
inputs. The fair value of warrants was $40,000 at December 31, 2010, compared to $50,000 at December 31,
2009. The fair value adjustment of $10,000 was included in other operating income of 2010.
F-45
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
For financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis that were still reflected in the balance
sheet at December 31, 2010, the following table provides the level of valuation assumptions used to determine
each adjustment and the carrying value of the related individual assets at December 31, 2010, and at
December 31, 2009, and the total losses for the periods indicated:
As of December 31, 2010
Total Losses
Fair Value Measurements
Using
Total at
For the Twelve Months Ended
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Fair Value December 31, 2010 December 31, 2009
(In thousands)
Assets
Impaired loans by type:
$— $ — $
Commercial loans . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . —
Construction-residential
Construction-other . . . . . . . . . . —
Real estate loans . . . . . . . . . . . —
Land loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —
4,824 $
500
5,659
99,309
730
4,824
500
5,659
99,309
730
—
—
—
—
Total impaired loans . . . . —
Loans held-for-sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . —
Other real estate owned (1) . . . . . . . —
Investments in venture capital . . . . . —
522
Equity investments . . . . . . . . . . . . .
— 111,022
2,873
—
11,105
72,159
8,410
—
—
—
111,022
2,873
83,264
8,410
522
$ 3,411
1,295
—
1,407
1,003
7,116
3,160
20,139
760
304
$ 16,293
23,234
12,493
27,350
11,639
91,009
19,252
28,216
1,982
—
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . .
$522
$72,159 $133,410 $206,091
$31,479
$140,459
(1) Other real estate owned balance of $77.7 million in the consolidated balance sheet is net of estimated
disposal costs.
As of December 31, 2009
Total Losses
Fair Value Measurements
Using
Total at
For the Twelve Months Ended
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Fair Value December 31, 2009 December 31, 2008
(In thousands)
Assets
Impaired loans by type:
$— $ 16,129 $
Commercial loans . . . . . . . . .
Construction-residential
. . . . —
Construction-other . . . . . . . . . —
Real estate loans . . . . . . . . . . —
Land loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —
Total impaired loans . . . —
Loans held-for-sale . . . . . . . . . . . . —
Other real estate owned (1) . . . . . . —
Investments in venture capital . . . . —
826
Equity investments . . . . . . . . . . . .
27,797
18,904
25,901
21,262
109,993
—
62,602
—
—
1,369 $ 17,498
52,087
24,290
19,646
742
25,901
—
21,262
—
26,401
54,826
13,206
8,147
—
136,394
54,826
75,808
8,147
826
$ 16,293
23,234
12,493
27,350
11,639
91,009
19,252
28,216
1,982
—
$ 5,312
12,979
—
3,699
5,225
27,215
—
3,604
11
1,042
Total assets . . . . . . . . . .
$826
$172,595 $102,580 $276,001
$140,459
$31,872
(1) Other real estate owned balance of $71.0 million in the consolidated balance sheet is net of estimated
disposal costs.
F-46
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
17. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial
instruments.
Cash and Cash Equivalents. For cash and cash equivalents, the carrying amount was assumed to be a
reasonable estimate of fair value.
Short-term Investments. For short-term investments, the carrying amount was assumed to be a reasonable
estimate of fair value.
Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell The fair value of the agreements to resell is based on
dealer quotes.
Securities. For securities including securities held-to-maturity, available-for-sale and for trading, fair values
were based on quoted market prices at the reporting date. If a quoted market price was not available, fair value
was estimated using quoted market prices for similar securities or dealer quotes.
Loans held for sale. The Company records loans held for sale at fair value based on quoted price from third
party sources, or appraisal reports adjusted by sales commission assumption.
Loans. Fair values were estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Each loan
category was further segmented into fixed and adjustable rate interest terms and by performing and
non-performing categories.
The fair value of performing loans was calculated by discounting scheduled cash flows through the
estimated maturity using estimated market discount rates that reflect the credit and interest rate risk inherent in
the loan.
The fair value of impaired loans was calculated based on the net realized fair value of the collateral or the
observable market price of the most recent sale or quoted price from loans-held-for-sale.
Deposit Liabilities. The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts, and certain money market deposits
was assumed to be the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed-maturity
certificates of deposit was estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits with similar remaining
maturities.
Securities Sold under Agreements to Repurchase. The fair value of repurchase agreements is based on dealer
quotes.
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank. The fair value of the advances is based on quotes from the FHLB
to settle the advances.
Other Borrowings. This category includes federal funds purchased, revolving line of credit, and other short-
term borrowings. The fair value of other borrowings is based on current market rates for borrowings with similar
remaining maturities.
Long-term debt. The fair value of long-term debt is estimated based on the current spreads to LIBOR for
long-term debt.
F-47
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Currency Option Contracts and Foreign Exchange Contracts. The Company measures the fair value of
currency option and foreign exchange contracts based on dealer quotes.
Interest Rate Swaps. Fair value of interest rate swaps was derived from observable market prices for similar
assets.
Off-Balance-Sheet Financial Instruments. The fair value of commitments to extend credit, standby letters of
credit, and financial guarantees written were estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar
agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the
counter parties. The fair value of guarantees and letters of credit was based on fees currently charged for similar
agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate them or otherwise settle the obligations with the counter parties
at the reporting date.
Fair value was estimated in accordance with ASC Topic 825, formerly SFAS 107. Fair value estimates were
made at specific points in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial
instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one
time the Bank’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no market exists for a significant
portion of the Bank’s financial instruments, fair value estimates were based on judgments regarding future
expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and
other factors. These estimates were subjective in nature and involved uncertainties and matters of significant
judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect
the estimates.
F-48
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
As of December 31, 2010
As of December 31, 2009
Carrying
Amount
Fair Value
Carrying
Amount
Fair Value
(In thousands)
Financial Assets
Cash and due from banks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Short-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities purchased under agreements to resell . . . . .
Securities held-to-maturity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities available-for-sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trading securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans held-for-sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans, net
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Warrants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
87,347
206,321
110,000
840,102
2,003,567
3,818
2,873
6,615,769
40
$
87,347
206,321
110,000
837,359
2,003,567
3,818
2,873
6,596,501
40
$ 100,124
254,726
—
635,015
2,915,099
18
54,826
6,678,914
50
$ 100,124
254,726
—
628,908
2,915,099
18
54,826
6,528,170
50
Option contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign exchange contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
29,336
112,665
$
$
106
4,629
4,671
60,725
$
18
3,565
Notional
Amount
Fair Value
Notional
Amount
Fair Value
Carrying
Amount
Fair Value
Carrying
Amount
Fair Value
Financial Liabilities
Deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase . . . . . .
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank . . . . . . . . .
Other borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term debt
$6,991,846
1,561,000
550,000
27,576
171,136
$7,006,913
1,704,585
580,054
27,585
114,557
$7,505,040
1,557,000
929,362
26,532
171,136
$7,520,604
1,695,130
993,243
26,410
92,553
Option contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest rate swaps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign exchange contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
72
300,000
68,355
$
72
6,508
1,873
$
8
300,000
60,846
$
8
694
967
Notional
Amount
Fair Value
Notional
Amount
Fair Value
Notional
Amount
Fair Value
Notional
Amount
Fair Value
Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commitments to extend credit
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Standby letters of credit
Other letters of credit
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bill of lading guarantees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$1,360,266
59,876
62,722
245
$
$
(603) $1,591,019
61,488
(282)
49,257
(38)
300
(1)
(621)
(200)
(22)
(1)
18. Employee Benefit Plans
Employee Stock Ownership Plan. Under the Company’s Amended and Restated Cathay Bank Employee
Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”), the Company can make annual contributions to a trust in the form of either
cash or common stock of the Bancorp for the benefit of eligible employees. Employees are eligible to participate
F-49
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
in the ESOP after completing two years of service for salaried full-time employees or 1,000 hours for each of two
consecutive years for salaried part-time employees. The amount of the annual contribution is discretionary except
that it must be sufficient to enable the trust to meet its current obligations. The Company also pays for the
administration of this plan and of the trust. The Company has not made contributions to the trust since 2004 and
does not expect to make any contributions in the future. Effective June 17, 2004, the ESOP was amended to
provide the participants the election either to reinvest the dividends on the Company stock allocated to their
accounts or to have these dividends distributed to the participant. The ESOP trust purchased 4,881 shares in
2010, 22,515 shares in 2009, and 36,428 shares in 2008, of the Bancorp’s common stock at an aggregate cost of
$51,000 in 2010, $289,000 in 2009 and $610,000 in 2008. All purchases after 2006 were through the Dividend
Reinvestment Plan. The distribution of benefits to participants totaled 171,689 shares in 2010, 89,968 shares in
2009, and 55,235 shares in 2008. As of December 31, 2010, the ESOP owned 1,381,634 shares, or 1.8%, of the
Company’s outstanding common stock.
401(k) Plan. In 1997, the Board approved the Company’s 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan, which began on
March 1, 1997. Salaried employees who have completed three months of service and have attained the age of 21
are eligible to participate. Enrollment dates are on January 1st, April 1st, July 1st, and October 1st of each year.
Participants may contribute up to 75% of their eligible compensation for the year but not to exceed the dollar
limit set by the Internal Revenue Code. Participants may change their contribution election on the enrollment
dates. Prior to April 1, 2009, the Company matched 100% on the first 5% of eligible compensation contributed
per pay period by the participant, after one year of service. The vesting schedule for the matching contribution is
0% for less than two years of service, 25% after two years of service and from then on, at an increment of 25%
each year until 100% is vested after five years of service. In February 2009, the Board revised and reduced the
contribution match for the Company’s 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan. Effective on April 1, 2009, the Company
matches 100% on the first 2.5% of eligible compensation contributed per pay period by the participant, after one
year of service. The Company’s contribution amounted to $0.9 million in 2010, $1.1 million in 2009, and
$1.8 million in 2008. The Plan allows participants to withdraw all or part of their vested amount in the Plan due
to certain financial hardship as set forth in the Internal Revenue Code and Treasury Regulations. Participants
may also borrow up to 50% of the vested amount, with a maximum of $50,000. The minimum loan amount is
$1,000.
19. Equity Incentive Plans
In 1998, the Board adopted the Cathay Bancorp, Inc. Equity Incentive Plan. Under the Equity Incentive
Plan, as amended in September, 2003, directors and eligible employees may be granted incentive or non-statutory
stock options and/or restricted stock units, or awarded non-vested stock, for up to 7,000,000 shares of the
Company’s common stock on a split adjusted basis. In May 2005, the stockholders of the Company approved the
2005 Incentive Plan which provides that 3,131,854 shares of the Company’s common stock may be granted as
incentive or non-statutory stock options, or as restricted stock, or as restricted stock units. In conjunction with the
approval of the 2005 Incentive Plan, the Bancorp agreed to cease granting awards under the Equity Incentive
Plan. As of December 31, 2009, the only options granted by the Company under the 2005 Incentive Plan were
non-statutory stock options to selected bank officers and non-employee directors at exercise prices equal to the
fair market value of a share of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Such options have a maximum
ten-year term and vest in 20% annual increments (subject to early termination in certain events) except certain
options granted to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company in 2005 and 2008. If such options expire or
terminate without having been exercised, any shares not purchased will again be available for future grants or
awards. Stock options are typically granted in the first quarter of the year. There were no options granted in 2009
or in 2010. On February 21, 2008, the Company granted options to purchase 689,200 shares and restricted stock
units covering 82,291 shares to selected bank officers and non-employee directors. The Company expects to
issue new shares to satisfy stock option exercises and the vesting of restricted stock units.
F-50
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Cash received from exercises of stock options totaled $13,000 for 1,280 shares in 2009. No options were
exercised in 2010. The fair value of stock options vested in 2010 was $4.9 million compared to $5.7 million in
2009. Aggregate intrinsic value for options exercised was $8,000 in 2009.
A summary of stock option activity for 2010, 2009, and 2008 follows:
Shares
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
Weighted-Average
Remaining Contractual
Life (in years)
Aggregate Intrinsic
Value (in thousands)
Balance, December 31, 2007 . . . . . . . .
4,574,280
$28.36
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
689,200
(20,906)
(36,200)
Balance, December 31, 2008 . . . . . . . .
5,206,374
Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(1,280)
(35,441)
Balance, December 31, 2009 . . . . . . . .
5,169,653
Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(222,305)
Balance, December 31, 2010 . . . . . . . .
4,947,348
Exercisable, December 31, 2010 . . . . . .
4,469,674
23.37
17.80
31.97
$27.72
10.63
29.58
$27.71
23.23
27.93
$28.02
6.1
5.6
4.6
3.7
3.4
$24,487
$ 6,220
$ —
$
$
334
334
At December 31, 2010, 1,839,153 shares were available under the 2005 Incentive Plan for future grants. The
following table shows stock options outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2010, the corresponding
exercise prices, and the weighted-average contractual life remaining:
Exercise Price
Shares
Outstanding
Weighted-Average
Remaining Contractual Life
(in Years)
Exercisable Shares
11.34 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
15.05 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
16.28 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
17.29 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
19.93 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
21.09 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
22.01 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
23.37 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
24.80 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
28.70 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
32.26 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
32.47 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
33.54 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
37.00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
38.38 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
36.90 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
36.24 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
38.26 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10,240
129,328
154,376
10,240
336,164
10,240
406,674
666,390
884,056
494,000
10,000
245,060
264,694
618,630
15,000
266,026
414,230
12,000
4,947,348
F-51
2.0
0.1
1.1
1.0
2.1
0.0
0.1
7.2
2.9
3.1
3.5
4.2
4.4
4.1
3.9
5.0
5.1
5.3
3.7
10,240
129,328
154,376
10,240
336,164
10,240
406,674
326,556
884,056
494,000
10,000
245,060
264,694
618,630
15,000
213,432
331,384
9,600
4,469,674
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
In addition to stock options above, in February 2008, the Company also granted restricted stock units on
82,291 shares of the Company’s common stock to its eligible employees. On the date of granting of these
restricted stock units, the closing price of the Company’s common stock was $23.37 per share. Such restricted
stock units have a maximum term of five years and vest in approximately 20% annual increments subject to
continued employment with the Company. On February 21, 2009, restricted stock units on 15,828 shares were
vested at the closing price of $8.94 per share. Among the 15,828 restricted stock units, 2,865 shares were
cancelled immediately for employees who elected to satisfy income tax withholding amounts through
cancellation of shares and 12,963 common stock shares were issued on February 21, 2009. On February 21,
2010, additional restricted stock units on 15,006 shares were vested and the common stock shares were issued at
the closing price of $9.64 per share. On February 21, 2011, additional restricted stock units on 12,633 shares
were vested and common stock shares were issued at the closing price of $18.79 per share. The following table
presents restricted stock unit activity for 2010, 2009, and 2008:
Balance at December 31, 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cancelled or forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Units
—
82,291
(2,754)
Balance at December 31, 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
79,537
Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cancelled or forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(12,963)
(6,553)
Balance at December 31, 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
60,021
Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cancelled or forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(15,006)
(6,055)
Balance at December 31, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
38,960
The compensation expense recorded related to the restricted stock units above was $327,000 in 2010 and
$327,000 in 2009. Unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to restricted stock units was
$708,000 at December 31, 2010, and is expected to be recognized over the next 2.1 years.
The following table summarizes the tax benefit from options exercised:
(Short-fall)/benefit of tax deductions in excess of grant-date fair value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Benefit of tax deductions on grant-date fair value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2010
2009
2008
(In thousands)
$(539) $(196) $(247)
304
198
539
Total benefit of tax deductions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ — $
2
$ 57
F-52
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
20. Condensed Financial Information of Cathay General Bancorp
The condensed financial information of the Bancorp as of December 31, 2010, and December 31, 2009, and
for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 is as follows:
Balance Sheets
Assets
Cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Short-term certificates of deposit
Investment in bank subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment in non-bank subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Year Ended December 31,
2010
2009
(In thousands, except
share and per share data)
$
787
36,500
1,498,572
2,611
12,426
$
448
24,500
1,386,729
2,932
12,944
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$1,550,896
$1,427,553
Liabilities
Junior subordinated debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 121,136
2,102
$ 121,136
2,173
Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
123,238
123,309
Commitments and contingencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
—
Stockholders’ equity
Preferred stock, 10,000,000 shares authorized, 258,000 issued and outstanding at
December 31, 2010, and December 31, 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 82,739,348
issued and 78,531,783 outstanding at December 31, 2010, and 67,667,155
issued and 63,459,590 outstanding at December 31, 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additional paid-in-capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Treasury stock, at cost (4,207,565 shares at December 31, 2010, and at December 31,
2009) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
247,455
243,967
827
762,509
(1,022)
543,625
677
634,623
(875)
551,588
(125,736)
(125,736)
Total stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,427,658
1,304,244
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$1,550,896
$1,427,553
F-53
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Statements of Operations
Year Ended December 31,
2010
2009
2008
Cash dividends from Cathay Bank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Loss)/income before income tax benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Loss)/income before undistributed earnings of subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Undistributed earnings/(loss) of subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(In thousands)
$ — $ — $26,727
84
6,746
(1,061)
937
299
3,817
(1,929)
3,581
227
3,075
(782)
1,308
(4,938)
(2,076)
(2,862)
14,427
(9,028)
(3,796)
18,067
(3,641)
(5,232)
(62,158)
21,708
28,813
Net income/(loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$11,565
$(67,390) $50,521
F-54
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Statements of Cash Flows
Cash flows from Operating Activities
Net income/(loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
Year Ended December 31,
2010
2009
2008
(In thousands)
$ 11,565
$ (67,390) $ 50,521
Equity in undistributed (earnings)/loss of subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Increase/(decrease) in accrued expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Write-downs on venture capital and other investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Write-downs on impaired securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss in fair value of warrants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Excess tax short-fall from stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Increase/(decrease) in other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decrease in other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(14,427)
3
521
492
29
539
1,040
(607)
62,158
(80)
2,246
—
41
196
(332)
(1,773)
(28,813)
29
1,356
—
21
247
(1,169)
(5,179)
Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(845)
(4,934)
17,013
Cash flows from Investment Activities
Additional investment in subsidiary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Increase)/decrease in short-term investment
Increase in available-for-sale securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercise of warrants to acquire common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sale of common stock acquired from exercise of warrants . .
Venture capital investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(94,000)
(12,000)
(418)
—
—
(1,056)
(103,874)
14,800
(2,846)
—
—
(897)
(219,300)
(39,300)
—
(62)
16
—
Net cash used in investment activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(107,474)
(92,817)
(258,646)
Cash flows from Financing Activities
Issuance of Series B Preferred Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Issuance of Common Stock Warrant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash dividends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Issuance of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from shares issued under the Dividend Reinvestment Plan . . . . . .
Proceeds from exercise of stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Excess tax short-fall from share-based payment arrangements . . . . . . . . . . .
—
—
(16,041)
124,928
310
—
(539)
(25)
—
(22,460)
119,447
1,160
13
(196)
240,554
17,673
(20,977)
—
2,551
373
(247)
Net cash used in financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
108,658
97,939
239,927
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
339
448
787
$
188
260
448
(1,706)
1,966
$
260
F-55
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
21. Dividend Reinvestment Plan
The Company has a Dividend Reinvestment Plan which allows for participants’ reinvestment of cash
dividends and certain optional additional investments in the Company’s common stock. Shares issued under the
plan and the consideration received were 28,778 shares for $310,000 in 2010, 87,241 shares for $1.2 million in
2009, and 151,157 shares for $2.6 million in 2008.
22. Regulatory Matters
The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies.
Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can result in certain mandatory and possibly additional
discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Bank’s financial
statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the
Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Bank’s assets, liabilities, and
certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Bank’s capital amounts
and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings,
and other factors. See Note 11 for discussion of possible future disallowance of Capital Securities as Tier 1
capital.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has established five capital ratio categories: “well capitalized,”
“adequately capitalized,” “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized,” and “critically undercapitalized.”
A well capitalized institution must have a Tier 1 capital ratio of at least 6%, a total risk-based capital ratio of at
least 10%, and a leverage ratio of at least 5%. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Bank qualified as well
capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action.
The Bancorp’s and the Bank’s capital and leverage ratios as of December 31, 2010, and December 31, 2009,
are presented in the tables below:
As of December 31, 2010
As of December 31, 2009
Company
Bank
Company
Bank
Balance
Percentage Balance
Percentage Balance
Percentage Balance
Percentage
(Dollars in thousands)
Tier I Capital (to risk-weighted
assets)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,228,184
15.37% $ 1,182,033
14.81% $ 1,101,050
13.55% $ 1,066,570
13.15%
Tier I Capital minimum
requirement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
319,607
4.00
319,209
4.00
324,937
4.00
324,502
4.00
Excess . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
908,577
11.37% $
862,824
10.81% $
776,113
9.55% $
742,068
9.15%
Total Capital (to risk-weighted
assets)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,379,758
17.27% $ 1,333,610
16.71% $ 1,253,701
15.43% $ 1,219,405
15.03%
Total Capital minimum
requirement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
639,214
8.00
638,418
8.00
649,874
8.00
649,003
8.00
Excess . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
740,544
9.27% $
695,192
8.71% $
603,827
7.43% $
570,402
7.03%
Tier I Capital (to average assets)
Leverage ratio .
Minimum leverage requirement
. . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,228,184
429,254
. .
11.44% $ 1,182,033
428,667
4.00
11.03% $ 1,101,050
457,059
4.00
9.64% $ 1,066,570
456,470
4.00
Excess . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
798,930
7.44% $
753,366
7.03% $
643,991
5.64% $
610,100
Total average assets (1) . . . . . . . . . $10,731,357
Risk-weighted assets . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7,990,176
$10,716,672
$ 7,980,219
$11,426,468
$ 8,123,420
$11,411,750
$ 8,112,538
(1) Average assets represent average balances for the fourth quarter of each year presented.
F-56
9.35%
4.00
5.35%
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
On December 17, 2009, we entered into a memorandum of understanding with Federal Reserve Bank of San
Francisco (the “FRB SF”) under which we agreed that we will not, without the FRB SF’s prior written approval,
(i) receive any dividends or any other form of payment or distribution representing a reduction of capital from the
Bank, or (ii) declare or pay any dividends, make any payments on trust preferred securities, or make any other
capital distributions. Under the memorandum, we agreed to submit to the FRB SF for review and approval a plan
to maintain sufficient capital at the Bancorp on a consolidated basis and at the Bank, a dividend policy for the
Bancorp, a plan to improve management of our liquidity position and funds management practices, and a
liquidity policy and contingency funding plan for the Bancorp. As part of our compliance with the memorandum,
on January 22, 2010, we submitted to the FRB SF a Three-Year Capital and Strategic Plan that updates a
previously submitted plan and establishes, among other things, targets for our Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio, total
risk-based capital ratio, Tier 1 leverage capital ratio and tangible common risk-based ratio, each of which, where
applicable, are above the minimum requirements for a well-capitalized institution. In addition, we agreed to
notify the FRB SF prior to effecting certain changes to our senior executive officers and board of directors and
we are limited and/or prohibited, in certain circumstances, in our ability to enter into contracts to pay and to
make golden parachute severance and indemnification payments. We also agreed in the memorandum that we
will not, without the prior written approval of the FRB SF, directly or indirectly, (i) incur, renew, increase or
guaranty any debt, (ii) issue any additional trust preferred securities, or (iii) purchase, redeem, or otherwise
acquire any stock.
On March 1, 2010, the Bank entered into a memorandum of understanding with the DFI and the FDIC
pursuant to which the Bank is required to develop and implement, within specified time periods, plans
satisfactory to the DFI and the FDIC to reduce commercial real estate concentrations, to enhance and to improve
the quality of the stress testing of the Bank’s loan portfolio, and to revise the Bank’s loan policy in connection
therewith; to develop and adopt a strategic plan addressing improved profitability and capital ratios and to reduce
the Bank’s overall risk profile; to develop and adopt a capital plan; to develop and implement a plan to improve
asset quality, including the methodology for calculating the loss reserve allocation and evaluating its adequacy;
and to develop and implement a plan to reduce dependence on wholesale funding. In addition, the Bank is
required to report progress to the DFI and FDIC on a quarterly basis. The Bank is also subject to a restriction on
dividends from the Bank to the Bancorp and is required to maintain adequate allowance for loan and lease losses
and is subject to restrictions on any new branches and business lines without prior approval. The Bank is required
to notify the FDIC and the DFI prior to effecting certain changes to our senior executive officers and board of
directors and is limited and/or prohibited, in certain circumstances, in its ability to enter into contracts to pay and
to make golden parachute severance and indemnification payments; and is required to retain management and
directors acceptable to the DFI and the FDIC. The Board of the Company established a Compliance Committee
to, among other things, review the Company’s management and governance and make recommendations for
improvement. No assurance can be given that our current management and directors are acceptable to the DFI or
the FDIC or that we will be able to retain or engage management or directors who are acceptable to the DFI and
the FDIC. Additionally, there can be no assurance that we will not be subject to further supervisory action or
regulatory proceedings.
F-57
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
23. Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited)
The following table sets forth selected unaudited quarterly financial data:
Summary of Operations
2010
2009
Fourth
Quarter
Third
Quarter
Second
Quarter
First
Quarter
Fourth
Quarter
Third
Quarter
Second
Quarter
First
Quarter
(In thousands, except per share data)
Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $118,332 $120,506 $124,287 $126,469 $130,038 $131,647 $129,252 $137,794
67,369
47,165
Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
63,255
51,748
59,132
56,283
49,680
43,095
Net interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for credit losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
75,237
10,000
73,341
17,900
74,607
45,000
74,721
84,000
73,755
91,000
72,515
76,000
65,997
93,000
70,425
47,000
Net-interest income/(loss) after provision for loan
losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income/(loss) before income tax expense . . . . . . . . .
Income tax expense/(benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income/(loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling
65,237
16,169
56,348
25,058
6,789
18,269
55,441
3,886
34,881
24,446
7,023
17,423
29,607
7,412
40,319
(3,300)
(5,373)
2,073
(9,279)
4,784
44,163
(48,658)
(23,068)
(25,590)
(17,245)
8,272
52,701
(61,674)
(26,550)
(35,124)
(3,485)
10,287
38,807
(32,005)
(14,482)
(17,523)
(27,003)
32,434
54,006
(48,575)
(24,055)
(24,520)
23,425
27,661
37,523
13,563
3,175
10,388
interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(158)
(151)
(150)
(151)
(154)
(156)
(150)
(151)
Net income/(loss) attributable to Cathay General
Bancorp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
18,111
17,272
1,923
(25,741)
(35,278)
(17,679)
(24,670)
10,237
Dividends on preferred stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(4,102)
(4,098)
(4,096)
(4,092)
(4,089)
(4,086)
(4,083)
(4,080)
Net income/(loss) available to common
stockholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 14,009 $ 13,174 $ (2,173) $ (29,833) $ (39,367) $ (21,765) $ (28,753) $
6,157
Basic net income/(loss) attributable to common
stockholders per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
0.18 $
0.17 $
(0.03) $
(0.41) $
(0.64) $
(0.43) $
(0.58) $
0.12
Diluted net income/(loss) attributable to common
stockholders per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
0.18 $
0.17 $
(0.03) $
(0.41) $
(0.64) $
(0.43) $
(0.58) $
0.12
F-58
Office Locations
Corporate
Headquarters
777 N. Broadway
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Tel: (213) 625-4700
Fax: (213) 625-1368
Corporate Center
9650 Flair Dr.
El Monte, CA 91731
Tel: (626) 279-3298
Fax: (626) 279-3295
Southern California
Branches
Alhambra
601 N. Atlantic Blvd.
Alhambra, CA 91801
Tel: (626) 284-6556
Fax: (626) 282-3496
Arcadia
1139 W. Huntington Dr.
Arcadia, CA 91007
Tel: (626) 574-7767
Fax: (626) 574-3075
Cerritos Valley
18643 S. Pioneer Blvd.
Artesia, CA 90701
Tel: (562) 809-1300
Fax: (562) 809-1415
City of Industry
1250 S. Fullerton Rd.
City of Industry, CA 91748
Tel: (626) 810-1088
Fax: (626) 810-2188
Diamond Bar
1195 S. Diamond Bar Blvd.
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
Tel: (909) 860-8299
Fax: (909) 861-0920
El Monte
9650 Flair Dr.
El Monte, CA 91731
Tel: (626) 279-3298
Fax: (626) 279-3295
Fountain Valley
17860 Newhope St., Ste. 104
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
Tel: (714) 619-0268
Fax: (714) 619-0278
Irvine
15323 Culver Dr.
Irvine, CA 92604
Tel: (949) 559-7500
Fax: (949) 559-7508
Irvine-Barranca
4010 Barranca Pkwy., Ste. 150
Irvine, CA 92604
Tel: (949) 551-1991
Fax: (949) 551-2438
Los Angeles
777 N. Broadway
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Tel: (213) 625-4791
Fax: (213) 625-1368
Monterey Park
250 S. Atlantic Blvd.
Monterey Park, CA 91754
Tel: (626) 588-1911
Fax: (626) 281-2956
Northridge
9045 Corbin Ave., Ste. 100
Northridge, CA 91324
Tel: (818) 886-3578
Fax: (818) 886-8057
Ontario
2000A S. Grove Ave., Unit 103
Ontario, CA 91761
Tel: (909) 923-8081
Fax: (909) 923-5378
Orange
2263 N. Tustin St.
Orange, CA 92865
Tel: (714) 283-8688
Fax: (714) 283-1988
Rowland Heights
17432 Colima Rd.
Rowland Heights, CA 91748
Tel: (626) 333-8533
Fax: (626) 336-4227
San Diego
4688 Convoy St.
San Diego, CA 92111
Tel: (858) 277-2030
Fax: (858) 277-3339
San Gabriel
825 E. Valley Blvd.
San Gabriel, CA 91776
Tel: (626) 573-1000
Fax: (626) 573-0983
Milpitas
1759 N. Milpitas Blvd.
Milpitas, CA 95035
Tel: (408) 262-0280
Fax: (408) 262-0780
Oakland
710 Webster St.
Oakland, CA 94607
Tel: (510) 208-3700
Fax: (510) 208-3727
Sacramento
5591 Sky Pkwy., Ste. 411
Sacramento, CA 95823
Tel: (916) 428-4890
Fax: (916) 428-4966
San Francisco
540 Montgomery St.
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel: (415) 398-3122
Fax: (415) 398-3117
San Jose
2010 Tully Rd.
San Jose, CA 95122
Tel: (408) 238-8880
Fax: (408) 238-2302
San Jose-Brokaw
1708 Oakland Rd., Ste. 400
San Jose, CA 95131
Tel: (408) 437-6188
Fax: (408) 437-6180
Torrance
23326 Hawthorne Blvd., Ste. 100
Torrance, CA 90505
Tel: (310) 373-9070
Fax: (310) 373-9087
Union City
1701 Decoto Rd.
Union City, CA 94587
Tel: (510) 675-9190
Fax: (510) 675-9312
Valley-Stoneman
43 E. Valley Blvd.
Alhambra, CA 91801
Tel: (626) 576-7600
Fax: (626) 576-5831
Westminster
9121 Bolsa Ave.
Westminster, CA 92683
Tel: (714) 890-7118
Fax: (714) 898-9267
Northern California
Branches
Berkeley-Richmond
3288 Pierce St., Ste. D-101
Richmond, CA 94804
Tel: (510) 526-8898
Fax: (510) 526-0639
Cupertino
10480 S. De Anza Blvd.
Cupertino, CA 95014
Tel: (408) 255-8300
Fax: (408) 255-8373
Dublin
7190 Regional St.
Dublin, CA 94568
Tel: (925) 551-8300
Fax: (925) 551-8310
Millbrae
1095 El Camino Real
Millbrae, CA 94030
Tel: (650) 652-0188
Fax: (650) 652-0180
New York Branches
Brooklyn
5402 8th Ave.
Brooklyn, NY 11220
Tel: (718) 435-0800
Fax: (718) 633-0128
Chatham Square
16-18 E. Broadway
New York, NY 10002
Tel: (212) 941-8500
Fax: (212) 941-8493
Chinatown
45 E. Broadway
New York, NY 10002
Tel: (212) 732-0200
Fax: (212) 732-7389
Flushing
40-14/16 Main St.
Flushing, NY 11354
Tel: (718) 886-5225
Fax: (718) 961-7680
Flushing (North)
36-54 Main St.
Flushing, NY 11354
Tel: (718) 683-3800
Fax: (718) 460-4509
Flushing (South)
41-48 Main St.
Flushing, NY 11355
Tel: (718) 886-7500
Fax: (718) 886-6938
Midtown
235 5th Ave.
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 725-3800
Fax: (212) 683-7822
Soho
129 Lafayette St.
New York, NY 10013
Tel: (646) 307-8300
Fax: (646) 613-8025
Illinois Branches
Broadway
4928 N. Broadway St.
Chicago, IL 60640
Tel: (773) 561-2300
Fax: (773) 561-3003
Chicago Chinatown
222 W. Cermak Rd.
Chicago, IL 60616
Tel: (312) 225-5991
Fax: (312) 225-2627
Westmont
665 Pasquinelli Dr., #B104
Westmont, IL 60559
Tel: (630) 325-7988
Fax: (630) 325-7442
Chicago Chinatown
Drive Up
250 W. Cermak Rd.
Chicago, IL 60616
Washington
Branches
Bellevue
13238 N.E. 20th St., Ste. 200
Bellevue, WA 98005
Tel: (425) 644-8822
Fax: (425) 644-6818
Kent
18030 E. Valley Hwy.
Kent, WA 98032
Tel: (425) 656-0278
Fax: (425) 656-0687
Seattle
621 S. Lane St.
Seattle, WA 98104
Tel: (206) 223-2890
Fax: (206) 223-3735
Texas Branches
Houston
9440 Bellaire Blvd., Ste. 118
Houston, TX 77036
Tel: (713) 278-9599
Fax: (713) 278-9699
Plano
4100 Legacy Dr., Ste. 403
Plano, TX 75024
Tel: (972) 618-2000
Fax: (972) 618-7345
Massachusetts
Branch
Boston Main
621 Washington St.
Boston, MA 02111
Tel: (617) 338-4700
Fax: (617) 338-1674
New Jersey Branch
Edison
1775 Rte. 27
Edison, NJ 08817
Tel: (732) 985-8880
Fax: (732) 985-6689
Edison Walk Up
1775 Rte. 27
Edison, NJ 08817
Overseas Branch
Hong Kong
503 Central Tower
No. 28 Queen’s Rd.
Central, Hong Kong
Tel: (852) 3710-1333
Fax: (852) 2810-1652
Overseas
Representative
Offices
Taipei
6/F, Ste. 3
146 Sung Chiang Rd.
Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Tel: (886-2) 2537-5057
Fax: (886-2) 2537-5059
Shanghai
Room 2610-A
Shanghai Kerry Centre
1515 Nanjing West Rd.
Shanghai 200040
People’s Republic of China
Tel: (86-21) 5298-5656
Fax: (86-21) 5298-6161
Registrar and
Transfer Agent
American Stock Transfer
and Trust Company
59 Maiden Lane
New York, NY 10038
Tel: (800) 937-5449
This is a Greener Annual Report.
Cathay General Bancorp is committed to
reducing its impact on the environment.
By producing our report this way, we
lessened the impact on the environment
in the following ways:
6 trees saved,
3,263 gal. water saved,
678 lbs. emissions prevented,
198 lbs. solid waste saved,
2,000,000 BTUs of energy not
consumed.
Corporate Information
Directors
Dunson K. Cheng
Chairman of the Board,
President, and Chief Executive
Officer of Cathay General
Bancorp and Cathay Bank
Peter Wu
Executive Vice Chairman of
the Board and Chief Operating
Officer of Cathay General
Bancorp and Cathay Bank
Michael M.Y. Chang
Retired Attorney and former
Secretary of Cathay General
Bancorp and Cathay Bank
Kelly L. Chan
CPA and Vice President,
Phoenix Bakery
Thomas C.T. Chiu
Medical Doctor
Nelson Chung
President of Pacific
Communities Builder, Inc.
Patrick S.D. Lee
Retired Real Estate Developer
Ting Y. Liu
Retired Investor
Joseph C.H. Poon
President of Edward
Properties Inc.
Anthony M. Tang
Executive Vice President of
Cathay General Bancorp,
Senior Executive Vice
President and Chief Lending
Officer of Cathay Bank
Thomas G. Tartaglia
Retired Banker
Emeritus
Directors
George T.M. Ching
Vice Chairman Emeritus of
Cathay General Bancorp and
Cathay Bank
Wilbur K. Woo
Vice Chairman Emeritus of
Cathay General Bancorp and
Cathay Bank
Cathay General
Bancorp
Dunson K. Cheng
Chairman of the Board,
President, and
Chief Executive Officer
Peter Wu
Executive Vice Chairman
of the Board and
Chief Operating Officer
Anthony M. Tang
Executive Vice President
Heng W. Chen
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer,
and Treasurer
Perry Oei
Senior Vice President, General
Counsel, and Secretary
Cathay Bank
Executive
Officers
Dunson K. Cheng
Chairman of the Board,
President, and
Chief Executive Officer
Peter Wu
Executive Vice Chairman
of the Board and
Chief Operating Officer
Anthony M. Tang
Senior Executive
Vice President and
Chief Lending Officer
Heng W. Chen
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Irwin Wong
Executive Vice President and
Chief Risk Officer
Kim R. Bingham
Executive Vice President and
Chief Credit Officer
Perry Oei
Senior Vice President, General
Counsel, and Secretary
Other Executive
Vice Presidents
Pin Tai
EVP, Deputy Chief Lending
Officer, and General Manager
of Eastern Regions
Eddie Chang
EVP and Manager, Corporate
Commercial Real Estate
and Construction Lending
Edward Kim
EVP and Manager,
Commercial Banking
Group Los Angeles
Shu-Yuan Lai
EVP and Director of
Business Development
Other Senior
Vice Presidents
Gregory Badura
SVP and Manager,
Special Assets
Jose Blanco
SVP and Commercial Lending
Manager, Commercial
Banking Group Los Angeles
Peggy Chan
SVP and Manager,
Commercial Lending, New
York and New Jersey Regions
Frank Chen
SVP and District
Administrator, Southern
California Region IV
Gary Cook
SVP, Loan Officer and
Manager, Other Real Estate
Owned Department
Marisa DeRojas
SVP and Chief BSA/AML/
OFAC Officer
Jane Ho
SVP and Manager,
High Tech Lending
Olha Holland
SVP and Operations
Administrator
Angela Hui
SVP and Assistant Manager,
Corporate Commercial Real
Estate and Construction
Lending
Ayub Kathrada
SVP and Commercial Lending
Manager, Commercial
Banking Group Los Angeles
Dennis Kwok
SVP and Treasurer
Alex Lee
SVP and Deputy Branch
Administrator
Maggie Lee
SVP and Team Manager,
Multi-Cultural Corporate
Lending Group
Shu Lee
SVP and District
Administrator, Southern
California Region III
David Lin
SVP and District
Administrator, Northern
California Region
Michael Lum
SVP and Regional Manager,
Washington Region
Ernest Oon
SVP and Deputy Chief Credit
Officer
Jennifer L. Powells
SVP and Director of
Human Resources
Robert Romero
SVP and Chief Information
Officer
Wilson Tang
SVP and District Administrator,
Southern California Region I
Veronica Tsang
SVP and District Administrator,
Eastern Regions
Esther Wee
SVP and Credit Administrator
Susan Yang
SVP and Team Manager,
Corporate Commercial Lending
board of directors
Front Row: (left to right) dunson K. cheng, peter Wu; 2nd Row: (left to right) thomas c.t. chiu, michael m. y. chang, patrick s. d. lee, anthony m. tang; 3rd Row: (left to right) Kelly l.
chan, ting y. liu, Joseph c. h. poon; 4th Row: (left to right) nelson chung, thomas g. tartaglia.
forward-looking statements
This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the applicable provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 regarding management’s beliefs,
projections, and assumptions concerning future results and events. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provision for forward-looking statements in these
provisions. All statements other than statements of historical fact are ‘forward-looking statements’ for purposes of federal and state securities laws, including statements about anticipated future
operating and financial performance, financial position and liquidity, growth opportunities and growth rates, growth plans, acquisition and divestiture opportunities, business prospects, strategic
alternatives, business strategies, financial expectations, regulatory and competitive outlook, investment and expenditure plans, financing needs and availability, and other similar forecasts and
statements of expectation and statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. Words such as ‘aims,’ ‘anticipates,’ ‘believes,’ ‘could,’ ‘estimates,’ ‘expects,’ ‘hopes,’ ‘intends,’ ‘may,’
‘plans,’ ‘projects,’ ‘seeks,’ ‘shall,’ ‘should,’ ‘will,’ ‘predicts,’ ‘potential,’ ‘continue,’ and variations of these words and similar expressions are intended to identify these forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements by us are based on estimates, beliefs, projections, and assumptions of management and are not guarantees of future performance. These forward-looking statements
are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our historical experience and our present expectations or projections. Such risks and
uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited to, adverse developments or conditions related to or arising from: U.S. and international economic and market conditions; market
disruption and volatility; current and potential future supervisory action by bank supervisory authorities and changes in laws and regulations, or their interpretations; restrictions on dividends and
other distributions by laws and regulations and by our regulators and our capital structure; credit losses and deterioration in asset or credit quality; availability of capital; potential goodwill
impairment; liquidity risk; fluctuations in interest rates; past and future acquisitions; inflation and deflation; success of expansion, if any, of our business in new markets; the soundness of other
financial institutions; real estate market conditions; our ability to compete with competitors; increased costs of compliance and other risks associated with changes in regulation and the current
regulatory environment, including the requirements of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), the potential for substantial changes in the legal,
regulatory, and enforcement framework and oversight applicable to financial institutions in reaction to recent adverse financial market events, including changes pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act;
the short term and long term impact of the Basel II and the proposed Basel III capital standards of the Basel Committee; our ability to retain key personnel; successful management of reputational
risk; natural disasters and geopolitical events; general economic or business conditions in California, Asia, and other regions where Cathay Bank has operations; restrictions on compensation paid
to our executives as a result of our participation in the TARP Capital Purchase Program; our ability to adapt our information technology systems; and changes in accounting standards or tax laws
and regulations. These and other factors are further described in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (at Item 1A in particular), contained in this Annual Report,
other reports and registration statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘SEC’), and other filings we make with the SEC from time to time. Actual results in any future period
may also vary from the past results discussed in this report. Given these risks and uncertainties, we caution readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak
to the date of this report. We have no intention and undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement or to publicly announce any revision of any forward-looking statement to reflect
future developments or events, except as required by law.
Cathay General Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, and other filings with the SEC are available at the website maintained by the SEC at
http://www.sec.gov, or by request directed to Cathay General Bancorp, 9650 Flair Drive, El Monte, California 91731, Attention: Investor Relations (626) 279-3286. These reports and filings
are also available at http://www.cathaygeneralbancorp.com. The information contained on the websites of Cathay General Bancorp and Cathay Bank are not part of this Annual Report.
Cathay Bank, Member FDIC, is an Equal Housing Lender.
FDIC insurance coverage is limited to deposit accounts at Cathay Bank’s U.S. domestic branch locations.
Non-Deposit Investment Products ARE NOT FDIC INSURED | ARE NOT BANK GUARANTEED | MAY LOSE VALUE.
777 North Broadway, Los Angeles, CA 90012
T: (213) 625-4700 F: (213) 625-1368
www.cathaygeneralbancorp.com
www.cathaybank.com