Quarterlytics / Basic Materials / Cazaly Resources

Cazaly Resources

caz · ASX Basic Materials
Claim this profile
Ticker caz
Exchange ASX
Sector Basic Materials
Industry
Employees 1-10
← All annual reports
FY2007 Annual Report · Cazaly Resources
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
First Floor, 22 Oxford Close West Leederville WA 6007

T: (08) 9380 4600 F: (08) 9381 5911

www.cazalyresources.com.au

ABN: 23 101 049 334

A N N U A L R E P O R T 0 7

CORPORATE DIRECTORY

MANAGING DIRECTOR

Nathan McMahon

MANAGING DIRECTOR

Clive Jones

NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

Kent Hunter

COMPANY SECRETARY

Lisa Wynne

PRINCIPAL & REGISTERED OFFICE

First Floor, 22 Oxford Close

WEST LEEDERVILLE WA 6007

Telephone: (08) 9380 4600

Facsimile: (08) 9381 5911

AUDITORS

Rix Levy Fowler

Level 1,

12 Kings Park Road

WEST PERTH WA 6005

SHARE REGISTRAR

Advanced Share Registry Services

110 Stirling Highway
NEDLANDS WA 6009

Telephone: (08) 9389 8033

Facsimile: (08) 9389 7871

STOCK EXCHANGE LISTING

Australian Stock Exchange

(Home Exchange: Perth, Western Australia)

Code: CAZ

BANKERS

National Australia Bank

50 St Georges Terrace

PERTH WA 6000

www.cazalyresources.com.au

1

CONTENTS

Directors’ Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

Review Of Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

Auditors’ Independence Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

Income Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

Balance Sheet  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

Statement of Changes in Equity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

Cash Flow Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

Notes to the Financial Statements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

Directors’ Declaration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44

Independent Audit Report To The Members
Of Cazaly Resources Limited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45

Additional Shareholder Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47

2

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

D i r e c t o r s ’   R e p o r t

DIRECTORS’  REPORT

Your directors present their report on the company and its controlled entities for the financial year ended 30 June 2007.

1. DIRECTORS

The names of directors in office at any time during or since the end of the year are:

Nathan McMahon
Clive Jones
Kent Hunter

Directors have been in office since the start of the financial year to the date of this report unless otherwise stated.

COMPANY SECRETARY

The following person held the position of company secretary at the end of the financial year:
Kent Hunter - B Bus, CA

Lisa Wynne was appointed to the role 6 August 2007 following Kent Hunter’s resignation.
Ms Wynne has a Bachelor of Commerce and is a Chartered Accountant with 6 years experience working with listed entities in
senior financial roles responsible for management and financial reporting, taxation, and ensuring continuous disclosure and
compliance. Lisa presently works with a number of emerging ASX and AIM listed resource companies and specialises in
financial and company secretarial transaction and corporate work.

2. PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES

The principal activity of the economic entity during the financial period was mineral exploration.

There were no significant changes in the nature of the economic entity’s principal activities during the financial period.

3. OPERATING RESULTS

The gain of the economic entity after providing for income tax amounted to $1,197,992 (2006: Loss $6,369,945).

4. DIVIDENDS PAID OR RECOMMENDED

The directors do not recommend the payment of a dividend and no amount has been paid or declared by way of a dividend
to the date of this report.

5. REVIEW OF OPERATIONS

Shovelanna Iron Ore Project - Current
On 28 August 2007, the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Western Australia unanimously refused to quash the
Minister's decision to terminate the application by Cazaly Iron Pty Ltd for exploration 46/678 under s 111A(1)(c)(ii) of the
Mining Act 1978 (WA). On 25 September 2007, having sought advice from Mr Tom Bathurst QC, Cazaly lodged an application
for special leave to appeal to the High Court of Australia in respect of the decision of the Court of Appeal.

3

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

D i r e c t o r s ’   R e p o r t

Cazaly must lodge a summary of its argument and draft appeal notice by 23 October 2007.

Cazaly has been informally advised by the High Court that the application for special leave to appeal will likely be heard
between 3 and 9 months from the date it was lodged, which means that the application will be heard sometime between
January and June 2008. Should Cazaly be successful in obtaining leave to appeal, the substantive application would likely be
heard by the High Court 3 to 9 months thereafter.

On the 28th August 2007 the Western Australian Court of Appeal delivered its judgment in relation to Cazaly Iron Pty Ltd's
application to quash the decision of the former Minister for Resources to terminate Cazaly's application.The Court of Appeal
has refused Cazaly's application to quash the decision and has specifically ordered that:

1  the order nisi made on 11 August 2006 be discharged;
2  Cazaly's application for declaratory and other relief be dismissed;
3  Cazaly pay the costs of the first and second respondents, to be taxed; and 
4  The limits provided for in relevant items of the Legal Practitioners (Supreme Court) (Contentious Business) Determination

be removed.

The Company would like to make clear that the judgment related only to the legal issues raised by the decision made by
former Minister Bowler. It was neither a review of the commercial nor policy merits of the Minister's decision.The Company
continues to contend that the former Minister's decision is fundamentally flawed.

Cazaly believes this judgment has jeopardised the future development of the Western Australian resources industry and in
particular the iron ore industry. It is clear from this judgment that iron ore has, and is, being treated differently to any other
commodity under the WA Mining Act -it has its own set of rules.

It has been extremely difficult to reconcile this decision with what is in the best interests of the State and appears as an
impediment to anybody wanting to get on with the business of finding and developing the State’s resources.

This decision goes right against the very values that underpin the WA Mining Act, which is held up by the industry and all its
stakeholders to be pro-development, transparent in its actions and most of all fair. It is particularly important that we and the
industry as a whole be made aware of the rationale behind the decision so that we can all make fully informed investment
decisions in a totally transparent environment.

Shovelanna – Background
Since lodging the application for this project Cazaly had planned for the accelerated development of the Shovelanna Iron Ore
Project and completed:

• An agreement with Echelon Resources Limited who will commit the first $2.5 million towards exploring the project. $6M

programme planned.

• A Scoping study for project development 
• A project financing agreement with Investec Bank
• An MOU for the sale of ore with BHP Billiton
• Historical data assessment and a resource estimate.

The projected royalty stream to the State at current prices would have been approximately +$20M commencing within three
years of access to the ground.

Cazaly and its partners have always maintained that they have not only the financial and technical ability, but more importantly
the will and the commitment to develop the project in the best interests of their shareholders, the Pilbara region and the State
of Western Australia.

4

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

D i r e c t o r s ’   R e p o r t

5. REVIEW OF OPERATIONS (Cont’d)

West Kalgoorlie Gold Project
Cazaly has reached Agreement with Carbine Resources Ltd whereby Carbine will earn a 50 percent stake, with an option to
increase to 70 percent, in Cazaly’s entire gold exploration and development portfolio in the Kunanalling, Ora Banda, Grants
Patch, Carbine and Split Rocks regions.These tenements cover approximately 533 square kilometres and contain mineral
resources of 612,400 ounces of gold 

This agreement combines the project development skills of Carbine with the geology, exploration and tenement management
prowess of Cazaly.

1. Carbine will pay Cazaly a management fee of $41,700 per month over a period of 12 months commencing from the date

that the agreement is formalised.

2. Carbine will issue Cazaly with 2,000,000 ordinary fully paid shares in Carbine, with these shares voluntarily escrowed for a

period of 6 months.

3. On or before the first anniversary of the agreement, Carbine will pay a further $1,000,000 either, at Carbine’s election, by
cash or by 50/50 combined cash and Carbine shares, with the issue price of the shares being the 30-day volume weighted
average price (30 day VWAP) as calculated on the day prior to payment date.This payment will give Carbine an initial 35%
stake in the projects.

4. Carbine undertakes to fund exploration on the project areas equivalent to $4,500,000 over a period of no more than 36
months after the date of the agreement. On completion of this expenditure commitment, Carbine will have earned a 50%
stake in the projects.

5. Any mine developments on the project areas will be funded entirely by Carbine. Carbine will then be entitled to recoup its

investment (included accumulated interest charges) before sharing operating cash flows on a 50/50 basis with Cazaly.

6. Carbine will assume the role of Manager of the joint venture on completion of the payments mentioned in item 1.To that

end it has undertaken to use the professional services of Cazaly’s existing geology team and has agreed to reimburse Cazaly
direct costs plus 12 percent management fee for these services.

7. Any proceeds from the agreed sale, transfer or relinquishment of tenements in the project areas during the period up to

completion of the earn-in commitments, shall be shared 50% Cazaly, 50% Carbine.

The transaction is subject to all existing pre-emptive rights being waived, as well as standard clauses associated with Ministerial
approval of tenement ownership transferral.

The joint venture intends to commence exploration drilling in June 2007 and has already secured drilling equipment for this
programme. Drilling will initially focus on prospects along the Kunanalling shear, principally the Mick Adam, Wadi, Burgundy and
Picante deposits. Additionally, mine development options will be re-assessed as a priority.

The joint venture allows Cazaly to focus on its iron ore strategy whilst maintaining exposure to a strategic package of
tenement that it has spent a considerable amount of time and effort assembling.

The Agreement is consistent with the Company’s focus on the iron ore sector whilst retaining exposure to the quality
gold assets. Recent drilling at the Backflip prospect has been highly encouraging with the best results being 9 metres @
16g/t Au. Explorations is continuing.

Parker Range Joint Venture
Cazaly Resources Ltd (ASX:CAZ) entered into an iron ore farm-in agreement with Gondwana Resources Ltd (ASX:GDA),
covering the Parker Range Project. Details of the farm-in agreement were announced by GDA 3rd July 2007.The Parker Range
Project lies approximately 15 kilometres south-east of the Marvel Loch town site and approximately 50 kilometres by road
south of the Perth–Kalgoorlie rail. Potential exists for the delineation of an iron mineral resource.

Parker Range is a prominent north trending ridge some 13km long. Cazaly mobilized a field crew and exploration mapping was
completed at the Parker Range tenements, with the focus on the Mt Caudan banded iron formation (BIF). A total of 21

5

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

D i r e c t o r s ’   R e p o r t

rockchip samples were taken along the BIF, over 1.5km, with continuous mineralisation noted for 900m. Eight (8) samples
returned assay results greater than 60% Fe, see Table 1.

Table 1: Results of rock chip sampling, Mt Caudan, Parker Range Project

GDA East

GDA North

742394
742427
742201
742407
742351
742186
742250
742220
742231
742246
742330
742405
742291
742282
742427
742278
742331
742445
742274
742119
742289

6499126
6499574
6498481
6499313
6499141
6498493
6498790
6498750
6498739
6498731
6498896
6499124
6498777
6498915
6499312
6498788
6499162
6499565
6498721
6498080
6498888

Fe %

29.51
37.38
37.43
40.01
42.23
52.67
54.51
54.59
55.77
56.11
57.03
58.12
59.61
60.57
60.83
60.92
61.02
61.2
62.05
62.55
64.83

P %

0.0579
0.0407
0.0484
0.0557
0.0084
0.0596
0.0209
0.0152
0.014
0.0122
0.0605
0.0122
0.0128
0.0053
0.0346
0.007
0.0169
0.037
0.0125
0.0202
0.0059

SiO2%

Al2O3%

5
37.27
36.97
5.41
28.05
13.38
6.43
6.83
4.83
3.24
4.26
5.59
3.08
3.42
1.9
2.44
2.08
2.4
2
2.33
1.54

2.64
2.03
2.07
4.24
1.56
1.16
6.48
8.9
6.23
4.28
2.48
1
1.45
1.32
1.61
1.34
3.16
2.19
0.84
0.65
0.68

Notes: Analyses conducted by Kalassay Laboratories using X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry, Awaiting Loss on Ignition (LOI) results

Cazaly will mobilize a drill rig to test Mt Caudan as soon as regulatory consents are received.

The Yilgarn Iron Province has a history of large-scale iron production, with the first iron ore exported from Western Australia
coming from the Koolanooka deposit in the Yilgarn during the mid 1960s. More recently, iron ore mining in the Yilgarn has
been characterised by modest production from several small and dispersed hematite deposits, such as Koolyanobbing.The
Parker Range Project was subject to iron ore exploration during the 1960s and reconnaissance exploration identified goethite,
hematite and magnetite mineralisation.

Other Projects
The Company retains significant free-carried interests in other exploration projects including Mt. Clifford, Goongarrie, Bardoc
and Jutson Rocks, among others.The Company has several active exploration projects including additional Pilbara Iron ore
tenements and the Jillewarra base metals project.

Corporate
The Company recently completed a placement of 5.75M shares @ $0.60 with institutional shareholders to raise a further $3.45M.

During the year the Joint Managing Director’s exercised 750,000 options raising a further $295,250.

The Company retains a significant shareholding in several ASX listed entities including; Newera Uranium Limited (ASX:NRU),
Northern Mining Ltd (ASX:NMI), Whinnen Resources Ltd (ASX:WWW) and Trafford Resources Ltd (ASX:TRF).

6

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

D i r e c t o r s ’   R e p o r t

Financial Position
The net assets of the economic entity have increased by $517,488 from 30 June 2006 to $10.2 million in 2007 due largely to
the issue of shares to raise additional funds, exercise and acquire exploration assets.

The economic entity currently has $545,813 in cash assets which the Directors believe puts the economic entity in a sound
financial position with sufficient capital to effectively explore its current landholdings.

Future Developments, Prospects and Business Strategies
The economic entity will continue its mineral exploration activity at and around its exploration projects with the object of
identifying commercial resources.

The economic entity will also continue to identifying new mineral exploration opportunities within Australia and the rest of the
world for further potential acquisitions which may offer value enhancing opportunities for shareholders.

6. SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN STATE OF AFFAIRS

The following significant changes in the state of affairs of the economic entity occurred during the financial period:

On 5 October 2006, the Company issued 100,000 employee options under the Cazaly Resources Limited employee 
incentive scheme.

On 13 October 2006, the Company issued 1,000,000 unlisted options exercisable at $0.35 to Argonaut Investments Pty
Limited for the provision of consulting services.

On 13 October 2006, the Company issued 1,000,000 unlisted options exercisable at $0.50 to Argonaut Investments Pty
Limited for the provision of consulting services.

On 6 December 2006, the Company issued 2,200,000 Directors Options as approved by the members at the Annual General
Meeting on 29 November 2006.

On 11 January 2007, the Company announced it had completed the in-specie distribution of Newera Uranium Limited shares,
as approved at the General Meeting of Shareholders on 18 August 2006.

On 17 February 2007, Warwick Resources Limited listed on ASX and the economic entity received 500,000 ordinary fully paid
shares in Warwick Resources Limited pursuant to Agreement dated 22 November 2006.

On 19 June 2007, the Company issued 250,000 employee options under the Cazaly Resources Limited employee incentive scheme.

During the year a total of 1,500,000 options were exercised to raise a total of $518,700.

7. AFTER BALANCE DATE EVENTS

On 6 August 2007, Lisa Wynne was appointed to the role of Company Secretary following the resignation of Kent Hunter.

On 8 August 2007, the Company completed a placement of 5,750,000 ordinary shares to a range of institutional investors to
raise $3,450,000 before costs of the issue.

On 24 August 2007, the Company requested a trading halt while awaiting the Court of Appeal Hearing Judgment on the
Shovelanna tenement.The Court of Appeal refused Cazaly’s application to quash the decision of the former Minister for
Resources to terminate Cazaly’s application for Exploration Licence 46/678 (Shovelanna).

There were no other matters or circumstances that have arisen since the end of the financial period which significantly affected
or may significantly affect the operations of the Company, the results of those operations, or the state of affairs of the
Company in future financial years.

7

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

D i r e c t o r s ’   R e p o r t

8. FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS

The economic entity will continue its mineral exploration activity at and around its exploration projects with the object of
identifying commercial resources.

9. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES

The economic entity is aware of its environmental obligations with regards to its exploration activities and ensures that it
complies with all regulations when carrying out any exploration work.

10. INFORMATION ON DIRECTORS

Nathan McMahon
Qualifications

Experience

Managing Director (Corporate and Administration)
B.Com

Mr. McMahon has provided tenement management advise to the mining industry for
approximately 14 years to in excess of 20 public listed mining companies. Mr. McMahon has
specialised in native title negotiations, joint venture negotiations and project acquisition due
diligence. He is a director of several unlisted mining and exploration companies with
interests in platinum group elements, base metals, industrial minerals and diamond
exploration. Mr McMahon is also a director of Graynic Metals Limited.

Interest in Shares and Options

Fully Paid Ordinary Shares 
$0.2938 Options expiring on 31 August 2007 
$0.4436 Options expiring on 31 August 2008
$1.9436 Options expiring on 30 November 2009

5,190,910
1,000,000
500,000
1,000,000

Clive Jones
Qualifications

Experience

Managing Director (Technical)
B.App.Sc(Geol), M.AusIMM.

Mr Jones has been involved in mineral exploration for over 22 years and has worked on
the exploration for a range of commodities including gold, base metals, mineral sands,
diamonds and industrial minerals. Mr Jones was also previously a director of Mount Burgess
Mining Ltd, where he oversaw the discovery of the high grade Red October gold deposit
situated in the Eastern Goldfields of Western Australia. Mr Jones is also a director of
Jackson Gold Limited and Graynic Metals Limited.

Interest in Shares and Options

Fully Paid Ordinary Shares 
$0.4436 Options expiring on 31 August 2008
$1.9436 Options expiring on 30 November 2009

5,140,000
1,000,000
1,000,000

Kent Hunter 
Qualifications

Experience

Non-Executive Director 
B.Bus, CA.

Mr Hunter is a Chartered Accountant with over 15 years’ corporate and company
secretarial experience. He has been involved in the listing of 15 exploration companies on
ASX in the past four years with capital raisings exceeding $54 million. He has experience in
capital raisings, ASX compliance and regulatory requirements and is currently a director of
Scimitar Resources Limited, Gryphon Minerals Limited and Elixir Petroleum Limited and is
company secretary of four other ASX Listed entities.

Interest in Shares and Options

Fully Paid Ordinary Shares 
$0.4436 Options expiring on 31 August 2008
$1.9436 Options expiring on 30 November 2009

1,328,066
250,000
200,000

8

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

D i r e c t o r s ’   R e p o r t

11. REMUNERATION REPORT

Directorships of other listed companies 
Directorships of other listed companies held by directors in the three years immediately before the end of the financial year
are as follows:

Name

Company 

Period of directorship

Nathan McMahon

Clive Jones

Kent Hunter

Graynic Metals Limited
Bannerman Resources Limited
Catalyst Metals Limited
Northern Mining Limited
Hodges Resources Limited
Jackson Gold Limited
Graynic Metals Limited
Cortona Resources Limited
Bannerman Resources
Elixir Petroleum Limited
Scimitar Resources Limited
Venture Minerals Limited
Hamill Resources Limited
Gryphon Minerals Limited

Since February 2005
Since June 2007
Since July 2007
From April 2005 to December 2006
Since May 2007
Since March 2002
Since February 2005
Since January 2006
Since January 2007
Since March 2004
Since November 2002
Since May 2006
From November 2000 to September 2004
Since January 2004

This report details the nature and amount of remuneration for each director of Cazaly Resources Limited.

Remuneration Policy
The remuneration policy of Cazaly Resources Limited has been designed to align director objectives with shareholder and
business objectives by providing a fixed remuneration component which is assessed on an annual basis in line with market
rates.The board of Cazaly Resources Limited believes the remuneration policy to be appropriate and effective in its ability to
attract and retain the best directors to run and manage the company, as well as create goal congruence between directors 
and shareholders.

The board’s policy for determining the nature and amount of remuneration for board members is as follows:

The remuneration policy, setting the terms and conditions for the executive directors and other senior staff members,
was developed by the managing director and approved by the board after seeking professional advice from independent
external consultants.

In determining competitive remuneration rates, the Board seeks independent advice on local and international trends among
comparative companies and industry generally. It examines terms and conditions for employee incentive schemes, benefit plans
and share plans. Independent advice is obtained to confirm that executive remuneration is in line with market practice and is
reasonable in the context of Australian executive reward practices.

All executives receive a base salary (which is based on factors such as length of service and experience), superannuation and
fringe benefits.

The economic entity is an exploration entity, and therefore speculative in terms of performance. Consistent with attracting and
retaining talented executives, directors and senior executives are paid market rates associated with individuals in similar
positions, within the same industry.The Board however acquired and were issued shares as part of the terms of the Initial Public
Offer. Board members have retained these securities which assist in aligning their objectives with overall shareholder value.

Options have been issued to Board members to provide a mechanism to participate in the future development of the
Company and an incentive for their future involvement with and commitment to the Company.

9

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

D i r e c t o r s ’   R e p o r t

Options and performance incentives will be issued in the event that the entity moves from an exploration entity to a producing
entity, and key performance indicators such as profits and growth can be used as measurements for assessing Board performance.

The executive directors and executives receive a superannuation guarantee contribution required by the government, which is
currently 9% and do not receive any other retirement benefits.

All remuneration paid to directors is valued at the cost to the Company and expensed. Shares given to directors and
executives are valued as the difference between the market price of those shares and the amount paid by the director or
executive. Options are valued using the Black-Scholes methodology.

The board policy is to remunerate non-executive directors at market rates for comparable companies for time, commitment
and responsibilities.The managing director in consultation with independent advisors determines payments to the non-
executive directors and reviews their remuneration annually, based on market practice, duties and accountability.The maximum
aggregate amount of fees that can be paid to non-executive directors is subject to approval by shareholders at the Annual
General Meeting. Fees for non-executive directors are not linked to the performance of the Company. However, to align
directors’ interests with shareholder interests, the directors are encouraged to hold shares in the company.

Company Performance, Shareholder Wealth and Directors’ and Executives’ Remuneration
The remuneration policy has been tailored to increase goal congruence between shareholders and directors and executives.
This has been achieved by the issue of shares to the majority of the directors and executives to encourage the alignment of
personal and shareholder interest.

Details of Remuneration for Year Ended 30 June 2007
The remuneration for each director of the company receiving the highest remuneration during the year was as follows:

SHORT-TERM BENEFITS

POST EMPLOYMENT SECURITIES ISSUED TOTAL

Salary, Fees 
& Superannuation

Other

Non-

Super-

Retirement  Equity Options

Monetary annuation

Benefits

(i)

$

Directors
Nathan McMahon – Managing Director (ii)

2007
2006

180,000
157,667

Clive Jones – Managing Director (iii)

2007
2006

180,000
167,750

Kent Hunter – Non Executive Director (iv)

2007
2006

25,000
25,000

Total Remuneration Directors

2007
2006

385,000
350,417

-
-

-
-

42,827
51,660

42,827
51,660

-
-

-
-

-
-

-
-

-
-

-
-

2,250
2,250

2,250
2,250

-
-

-
-

-
-

-
-

-
-

-
-

-
-

220,000
650,800

400,000
808,467

220,000
650,800

400,000
818,550

44,000
162,700

114,077
241,610

484,000

-
914,077
- 1,464,300 1,868,627

i) The fair value of the Options is calculated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes model.
ii) An aggregate amount of $180,000 (2006:$ 157,667)was paid, or was due and payable to Kingsreef Pty Ltd, a company

controlled by Mr Nathan McMahon, for the provision of corporate and tenement management services to the Company.
iii) An aggregate amount of $180,000 (2006:$ 167,750) was paid, or was due and payable to Widerange Corporation Pty Ltd,

a company controlled by Mr Clive Jones, for the provision of geological services to the Company.

iv) An aggregate amount of $42,827 (2006:$ 51,660) was paid, or was due and payable to Mining Corporate Advisory Services

Pty Ltd, a company controlled by Mr Kent Hunter, for the provision of company secretarial services to the Company.

10

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

D i r e c t o r s ’   R e p o r t

11. REMUNERATION REPORT (Cont’D)

Options issued as part of remuneration for the year ended 30 June 2007

Options are issued to directors and executives as part of their remuneration.The options are not issued based on
performance criteria, but are issued to the majority of directors and executives of Cazaly Resources Limited and its subsidiaries
to increase goal congruence between executives, directors and shareholders.

During and since the end of financial year, an aggregate of 4,550,000 options over unissued shares where granted to various
parties. 2,200,000 options of the total number granted were issued to the following directors and executives as disclosed in
the table below:

Directors

Number

Exercise Price

Vesting Date

Expiry Date

Nathan McMahon 
Clive Jones
Kent Hunter

1,000,000
1,000,000
200,000

$1.9436
$1.9436
$1.9436

11 December 2006
11 December 2006
11 December 2006

30 November 2009
30 November 2009
30 November 2009

Value of Options Granted to Directors 

The following table sets out the value of options granted, exercised and lapsed during the year:

Options
granted
Value at
grant
date
$

220,000
220,000
44,000

Options
exercised
Value at
exercise
date
$

(221,800)
-
(73,450)

Options
lapsed
Value at
time of
lapse
$

Value of
Options
included in 
remuneration
for the year
$

Percentage of
remuneration
for the year
that consists
of options
$

-
-
-

220,000
220,000
44,000

55.00%
55.00%
38.57%

Nathan McMahon 
Clive Jones
Kent Hunter

The following factors and assumptions were used in determining the fair value of options issued to Directors on grant date:

Grant
Date

Expiry
Date

Fair Value
Per Option

Exercise
Date

Price of
Shares on
Grant Date

Estimated
Volatility

Risk Free
Interest 
Rate

Dividend
Yield

11.12.06

30.11.09

$0.22

30.11.09

$0.605

120%

5.71%

-

Estimated volatility approximates historic volatility. Each option entitles the holder to purchase one ordinary share in 
the Company.

Employment Contracts of Directors and Senior Executives
The employment conditions of the Managing Directors, Nathan McMahon and Clive Jones, are formalised in a contract of
employment. Other than the Managing Directors, all executives are employees of Cazaly Resources Limited.

The employment contracts stipulate a range of one to three-month resignation periods.The economic entity may terminate an
employment contract without cause by providing one to three months written notice or making payment in lieu of notice,
based on the individual’s annual salary component.

11

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

D i r e c t o r s ’   R e p o r t

12. MEETINGS OF DIRECTORS

The number of directors' meetings held during the financial year each director held office during the financial year and the
number of meetings attended by each director are:

Director

N McMahon
C Jones
K Hunter

Directors Meetings

Number Eligible to Attend

Meetings Attended

3
3
3

3
3
3

The economic entity does not have a formally constituted audit committee as the board considers that the company’s size and
type of operation do not warrant such a committee.

13. INDEMNIFYING OFFICERS OR AUDITOR

In accordance with the constitution, except as may be prohibited by the Corporations Act 2001 every Officer, auditor or agent
of the Company shall be indemnified out of the property of the Company against any liability incurred by him in his capacity as
Officer, auditor or agent of the Company or any related corporation in respect of any act or omission whatsoever and
howsoever occurring or in defending any proceedings, whether civil or criminal.

14. OPTIONS

Unissued Shares Under Option

At the date of this report unissued ordinary shares of the Company under option are:

Expiry Date

2 July 2009
31 August 2007
31 December 2007
31 August 2008
24 January 2010
15 September 2008
5 October 2011
15 October 2008
30 November 2009
19 June 2012

Exercise Price

Number of Shares

$0.1938
$0.2938
$0.9436
$0.4436
$0.5236
$0.3500
$0.8036
$0.4436
$1.9436
$0.8600

150,000
1,000,000
5,000,000
1,750,000
75,000
500,000
100,000
1,000,000
2,200,000
250,000

During the year ended 30 June 2007, the following ordinary shares of the Company were issued on exercise of options.

Option Expiry

15 September 2008
2 July 2009
31 August 2007
31 August 2008

Exercise Price

Number of Shares

$0.35
$0.1938
$0.2938
$0.4436

500,000
250,000
250,000
500,000

12

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

D i r e c t o r s ’   R e p o r t

15. PROCEEDINGS ON BEHALF OF COMPANY

No person has applied for leave of Court to bring proceedings on behalf of the company or intervene in any proceedings to which
the company is a party for the purpose of taking responsibility on behalf of the company for all or any part of those proceedings.

The economic entity was not a party to any such proceedings during the year.

16. AUDITORS INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION

The lead auditor’s independence declaration for the year ended 30 June 2007 has been received and can be found on page 13
of the directors’ report.

17. NON AUDIT SERVICES

The board of directors is satisfied that the provision of non-audit services performed during the year by the Company’s
auditors is compatible with the general standard of independence for auditors imposed by the Corporations Act 2001.

No other fees were paid or payable to the auditors for non-audit services performed during the year ended 30 June 2007.

Signed in accordance with a resolution of the Board of Directors.

Kent Hunter
Director 28 September 2007

13

To The Board of Directors

Auditor’s Independence Declaration
under Section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001

This declaration is made in connection with our audit of the financial report of Cazaly Resources Ltd and controlled entities 
for the year ended 30 June 2007 and in accordance with the provisions of the Corporations Act 2001.

We declare that, to the best of our knowledge and belief, there have been:

• no contraventions of the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 in relation to the audit;
• no contraventions of the Code of Professional Conduct of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia in relation 

to the audit.

Yours faithfully

RIX LEVY FOWLER
Audit & Corporate Pty Ltd

RANKO MATIC
Director

DATED at PERTH this 28th day of September 2007

14

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

I N C O M E S T A T E M E N T  

INCOME STATEMENT 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2007

Note

2

2

Economic Entity

Parent Entity

2007
$

2006
$

2007
$

2006
$

62,902

226,619

62,262

126,619

4,701,931

2,331,531

3,016,604

2,331,531

(1,037,932)

(1,633,170)

(1,036,899)

(1,633,170)

(17,891)
(3,275)
(251,967)

(19,697)
(126,704)

(106,765)
-
(40,946)

(23,933)
(3,705)
(518,656)

(36,716)
(351,995)

(48,996)
(6,765)
(60,451)

(17,891)
(3,275)
(251,912)

(16,666)
(126,709)

(106,341)
-
(40,946)

(23,933)
(3,705)
(520,399)

(36,716)
(351,995)

(48,719)
(6,765)
(60,451)

(915,570)

(5,748,231)

(28,608)

(4,997,464)

-
(7,719)

(169,289)
(26,276)

(1,818,561)
(7,718)

(167,489)
(20,557)

3

6

2,236,367

(6,070,033)

(376,660)

(5,413,213)

(1,038,375)

299,912

(764,002)

(779,828)

1,197,992

(6,369,945)

(1,140,662)

(4,633,385)

18

2.32

(13.92)

Revenues

Other Income

Employee benefits expense
Depreciation and 
amortisation expense
Borrowing costs expense
Administrative expense
Advertising and 
promotional expenses
Consultancy expenses
Compliance and 
Regulatory expenses
Communication expenses
Occupancy expenses
Exploration expenditure
written-off
Provision for diminution in 
value of shares
Other expenses

Profit/(loss) before income 
tax expense/benefit

Income tax 
expense/(benefit) 

Net profit / (loss) 
attributable to members

Basic earnings (loss) 
per share (cents per share)

The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements

15

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

B A L A N C E S H E E T

BALANCE SHEET 
AS AT 30 JUNE 2007

Economic Entity

Parent Entity

Note

2007
$

2006
$

2007
$

2006
$

7
8

8
9
10

11
6

12
13

545,813
135,793

1,520,525
63,758

507,813
132,049

1,482,525
63,757

681,606

1,584,283

639,862

1,546,282

-
3,076,293
50,193

7,168,840
1,375,028

16,000
2,760,075
50,971

5,868,152
1,358,427

3,349,636
1,796,754
50,193

3,185,052
1,374,830

4,449,382
2,671,097
50,971

2,219,339
1,357,887

11,670,354

10,053,625

9,756,465

10,748,676

12,351,960

11,637,908

10,396,327

12,294,958

370,692
27,123

192,181
25,670

370,692
27,123

192,181
25,670

CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other receivables

TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS

NON CURRENT ASSETS
Trade and other receivables
Financial assets
Property, plant & equipment
Exploration, evaluation 
and development
Deferred tax assets

TOTAL NON 
CURRENT ASSETS

TOTAL ASSETS

CURRENT LIABILITIES
Trade and other payables
Short-term provision

TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES

397,815

217,851

397,815

217,851

NON CURRENT LIABILITIES
Deferred tax liabilities

TOTAL NON 
CURRENT LIABILITIES

6

2,740,657

1,662,082

1,386,348

581,802

2,740,657

1,662,082

1,386,348

581,802

TOTAL LIABILITIES

3,138,472

1,879,933

1,784,163

799,653

NET ASSETS

9,213,488

9,757,975

8,612,164

11,495,305

EQUITY
Issued capital
Reserves
Accumulated losses

14
15
16

4,969,582
6,764,446
(2,520,540)

7,012,583
6,463,924
(3,718,532)

4,969,582
6,764,446
(3,121,864)

7,012,583
6,463,924
(1,981,202)

TOTAL EQUITY

9,213,488

9,757,975

8,612,164

11,495,305

The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements.

16

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

S T A T E M E N T O F C H A N G E S I N E Q U I T Y

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2007

Issued
Capital
$

Retained Profits/
Accumulated Losses
$

Option
Reserve
$

ECONOMIC ENTITY
Balance at 1 July 2005
Loss attributable to members
Shares issued during the year
Options exercised during the year
Transaction costs
Option reserve
Balance at 30 June 2006

4,625,224
-
840,000
1,617,299
(69,940)
-
7,012,583

2,651,413
(6,369,945)
-
-
-
-
(3,718,532)

-
-
-
-
-
6,463,924
6,463,924

Total

$

7,276,637
(6,369,945)
840,000
1,617,299
(69,940)
6,463,924
9,757,975

Balance at 1 July 2006
Profit attributable 
to members
Shares issued during the year
Options exercised during the year
Transaction costs
Reduction of capital 
– In-specie distribution
Option reserve
Deferred tax liability component
Balance at 30 June 2007

PARENT ENTITY
Balance at 1 July 2005
Loss attributable 
to members
Shares issued during the year
Options exercised during the year
Transaction costs
Option reserve
Balance at 30 June 2006

Balance at 1 July 2006
Loss attributable to members
Shares issued during the year
Options exercised during the year
Transaction costs
Reduction of capital 
– In-specie distribution
Option reserve
Deferred tax liability component
Balance at 30 June 2007

7,012,583

(3,718,532)

6,463,924

9,757,975

-
518,700
361,900
-

(2,900,000)
-
(23,601)
4,969,582

1,197,992
-
-
-

-
-
-
(2,520,540)

-
-
(361,900)
-

-
662,422
-
6,764,446

1,197,992
518,700
-
-

(2,900,000)
662,422
(23,601)
9,213,488

4,625,224

2,652,183

-

7,277,407

-
840,000
1,617,299
(69,940)
-
7,012,583

7,012,583
-
518,700
361,900
-

(2,900,000)
-
(23,601)
4,969,582

(4,633,385)
-
-
-
-
(1,981,202)

(1,981,202)
(1,140,662)
-
-
-

-
-
-
(3,121,864)

-
-
-
-
6,463,924
6,463,924

6,463,924
-
-
(361,900)
-

-
662,422
-
6,764,446

(4,633,385)
840,000
1,617,299
(69,940)
6,463,924
11,495,305

11,495,305
(1,140,662)
518,700
-
-

(2,900,000)
662,422
(23,601)
8,612,164

The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements 

17

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

C a s h   f l o w   s t a t e m e n t

CASH FLOW STATEMENT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2007

Economic Entity

Parent Entity

Note

2007
$

2006
$

2007
$

2006
$

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

Payments to suppliers
and employees
Interest received
Other revenue
Payments for exploration 
and evaluation

Net cash used in 
operating activities

Cash Flows From Investing Activities

Proceeds from sale of 
exploration assets
Proceeds from sale of 
equity investments
Purchase of plant and equipment
Purchase of exploration assets
Purchase of equity investments
Loans (to)/receipts from 
associated entities

Net cash used in 
investing activities

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Proceeds from issue 
of securities
Payment for costs of 
issue of securities

Net cash provided 
by financing activities

(792,168)
65,558
358,790

(639,831)
71,740
239,119

(783,884)
64,918
358,790

(635,577)
71,740
139,119

(2,233,536)

(2,383,873)

(1,011,600)

(1,341,217)

19

(2,601,356)

(2,712,845)

(1,371,776)

(1,765,935)

505,000

832,388
(17,113)
-
(212,331)

-

-

-

494,749
(5,953)
(9,941)
(104,909)

831,440
(17,113)
-
(201,148)

494,749
(5,953)
(9,941)
(44,130)

-

61,731

(734,815)

(983,958)

1,107,944

435,677

(121,636)

(549,233)

518,700

2,201,050

518,700

2,201,050

-

(66,198)

-

(66,198)

518,700

2,134,852

518,700

2,134,852

Net increase in cash held

(974,712)

(142,316)

(974,712)

(180,316)

Cash and cash equivalents at 
beginning of the financial year

Cash and cash equivalents 
at end of the financial year

1,520,525

1,662,841

1,482,525

1,662,841

7

545,813

1,520,525

507,813

1,482,525

The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements 

18

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M e n t

1. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The financial report is a general purpose financial report that has been prepared in accordance with Australian Accounting
Standards, Australian Accounting Interpretations, other authoritative pronouncements of the Australian Accounting Standards
Board and the Corporations Act 2001.

The financial report covers the economic entity of Cazaly Resources Limited and controlled entities, and Cazaly Resources Limited
as an individual parent entity. Cazaly Resources Limited is a listed public company, incorporated and domiciled in Australia.

The financial report complies with Australian Accounting Standards, which include International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).

The financial report has also been prepared on a historical cost basis, except for derivative financial instruments and available
for-sale financial assets that have been measured at fair value.

The following is a summary of the accounting policies adopted by the Company in the preparation of the consolidated financial
information.The accounting policies have been consistently applied unless otherwise stated.

(a) Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements are prepared by combining the financial statements of all the entities that comprise the
Economic Entity, being the Company (the parent entity) and its subsidiaries as defined in Accounting Standard AASB 127
“Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements”. Consistent accounting policies are employed in the preparation and
presentation of the consolidated financial statements. On acquisition, the assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities of a subsidiary
are measured at their fair values at the date of acquisition. Any excess of the cost of acquisition over the fair values of the
identifiable net assets acquired is recognised as goodwill. If, after reassessment, the fair values of the identifiable assets acquired
exceed the cost of acquisition, the deficiency is credited to profit and loss in the period of acquisition.

The consolidated financial statements include the information and results of each subsidiary from the date on which the
Company obtains control and until such time as the Company ceases to control such entity.

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, all intercompany balances and transactions, and unrealised profits arising
within the Economic Entity are eliminated in full.

(b) Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment. Depreciation is provided on
property, plant and equipment, including freehold buildings but excluding land. Depreciation is calculated on a straight line basis
so as to write off the net cost or other revalued amount of each asset over its expected useful life to its estimated residual value.
The estimated useful lives, residual values and depreciation method are reviewed at the end of each annual reporting period.

The depreciation rates used for each class of depreciable assets are:

Class of Fixed Asset

Depreciation Rate

Plant and equipment
Office furniture and equipment
Motor vehicle
Leasehold improvements

40.0%
18.0%
22.5%
Term of Lease

19

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S

(c) Exploration, Evaluation and Development Expenditure

Costs incurred during exploration and evaluation related to an area of interest are accumulated. Costs carried forward
provided such costs are expected to be recouped through successful development, or by sale, or where exploration and
evaluation activities have not at balance date reached a stage to allow a reasonable assessment regarding the existence of
economically recoverable reserves. In these instances the entity must have rights of tenure to the area of interest and must be
continuing to undertake exploration operations in the area.

These assets are considered for impairment on an annual basis, depending on the existence of impairment indicators including:

• the period for which the Economic Entity has the right to explore in the specific area has expired during the period or will

expire in the near future, and is not expected to be renewed;

• substantive expenditure on further exploration for and evaluation of mineral resources in the specific area is neither

budgeted nor planned;

• exploration for and evaluation of mineral resources in the specific area have not led to the discovery of commercially viable
quantities of mineral resources and the Economic Entity has decided to discontinue such activities in the specific area; and
• sufficient key data exists to indicate that, although a development in the specific area is likely to proceed, the carrying amount

of the exploration and evaluation asset is unlikely to be recovered in full from successful development or by sale.

Costs carried forward in respect of an area of interest that is abandoned are written off in the year in which the decision to
abandon is made.

(d) Leases

Leases of fixed assets where substantially all the risks and benefits incidental to the ownership of the asset, but not the legal
ownership, are transferred to entities in the economic entity are classified as finance leases. Finance leases are capitalised,
recording an asset and a liability equal to the present value of the minimum lease payments, including any guaranteed residual
values. Leased assets are depreciated on a diminishing value basis over their estimated useful lives where it is likely that the
economic entity will obtain ownership of the asset or over the term of the lease. Lease payments are allocated between the
reduction of the lease liability and the lease interest expense for the period.

Lease payments for operating leases, where substantially all the risks and benefits remain with the lessor, are charged as
expenses in the periods in which they are incurred.

(e) Other Financial Assets

Financial assets in the scope of AASB 139 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement are classified as either financial
assets at fair value through profit or loss, loans and receivables, held-to-maturity investments, or available-for-sale investments, as
appropriate. When financial assets are recognised initially, they are measured at fair value, plus, in the case of investments not at
fair value through profit or loss, directly attributable transactions costs.The Company determines the classification of its financial
assets after initial recognition and, when allowed and appropriate, re-evaluates this designation at each financial year-end.

All regular way purchases and sales of financial assets are recognised on the trade date i.e. the date that the Company commits
to purchase the asset. Regular way purchases or sales are purchases or sales of financial assets under contracts that require
delivery of the assets within the period established generally by regulation or convention in the marketplace.

(i) Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
Financial assets classified as held for trading are included in the category ‘financial assets at fair value through profit or loss’.
Financial assets are classified as held for trading if they are acquired for the purpose of selling in the near term. Derivatives are
also classified as held for trading unless they are designated as effective hedging instruments. Gains or losses on investments
held for trading are recognised in profit or loss.

20

N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

1. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (COnt’d)

(ii) Held-to-maturity investments
Non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments and fixed maturity are classified as held-to-maturity when
the Company has the positive intention and ability to hold to maturity. Investments intended to be held for an undefined
period are not included in this classification. Investments that are intended to be held-to-maturity, such as bonds, are
subsequently measured at amortised cost.This cost is computed as the amount initially recognised minus principal repayments,
plus or minus the cumulative amortisation using the effective interest method of any difference between the initially recognised
amount and the maturity amount.This calculation includes all fees and points paid or received between parties to the contract
that are an integral part of the effective interest rate, transaction costs and all other premiums and discounts. For investments
carried at amortised cost, gains and losses are recognised in profit or loss when the investments are derecognised or impaired,
as well as through the amortisation process.

(iii) Loans and receivables
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active
market. Such assets are carried at amortised cost using the effective interest method. Gains and losses are recognised in profit
or loss when the loans and receivables are derecognised or impaired, as well as through the amortisation process.

(iv) Available-for-sale investments
Available-for-sale investments are those non-derivative financial assets that are designated as available-for-sale or are not
classified as any of the three preceding categories. After initial recognition available-for sale investments are measured at fair
value with gains or losses being recognised as a separate component of equity until the investment is derecognised or until the
investment is determined to be impaired, at which time the cumulative gain or loss previously reported in equity is recognised
in profit or loss.

The fair value of investments that are actively traded in organised financial markets is determined by reference to quoted
market bid prices at the close of business on the balance sheet date. For investments with no active market, fair value is
determined using valuation techniques. Such techniques include using recent arm’s length market transactions; reference to the
current market value of another instrument that is substantially the same; discounted cash flow analysis and option pricing models.

(f) Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents includes cash on hand, deposits held at call with banks, other short-term highly liquid investments
with original maturities of three months or less, and bank overdrafts. Bank overdrafts are shown within short-borrowings in
current liabilities on the balance sheet.

(g) Trade and Other Receivables

Trade receivables, which generally have 30-90 day terms, are recognised and carried at original invoice amount less an
allowance for any uncollectible amounts. An allowance for doubtful debts is made when there is objective evidence that the
entity will not be able to collect the debts. Bad debts are written off when identified.

(h) Revenue

Revenue from the sale of goods is recognised upon the delivery of goods to customers.
Interest revenue is recognised on a proportional basis taking into account the interest rates applicable to the financial assets.
Revenue from the rendering of a service is recognised upon the delivery of the service to the customers.
All revenue is stated net of the amount of goods and services tax (GST).

21

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S

(i) Impairment of Assets

At each reporting date, the Economic Entity reviews the carrying amounts of its tangible assets to determine whether there is
any indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the
asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss (if any). Where the asset does not generate cash
flows that are independent from the other assets, the Economic Entity estimates the recoverable amount of the cash-
generating unit to which the asset belongs.

Recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated future
cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the
time value of money and the risks specific to the asset for which the estimates of future cash flows have not been adjusted.

If the recoverable amount of an asset (or cash-generated unit) is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, the carrying
amount of the asset (cash-generating unit) is reduced to its recoverable amount. An impairment loss is recognised in the Profit
and Loss immediately, unless the relevant asset is carried at fair value, in which case the impairment loss is treated as a
revaluation decrease. Where an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the asset (cash-generating unit)
is increased to the revised estimate of its recoverable amount, but only to the extent that the increased carrying amount does
not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognised for the asset
(cash-generating unit) in prior years.

A reversal of an impairment loss is recognised in the Profit and Loss immediately, unless the relevant asset is carried at fair
value, in which case the impairment loss is treated as a revaluation increase.

(j) Goods and Services Tax (GST)

Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of GST, except where the amount of GST incurred is not
recoverable from the Australian Tax Office (“ATO”). In these circumstances the GST is recognised as part of the cost of
acquisition of the asset or as part of an item of the expense. Receivables and payables in the balance sheet are shown inclusive
of GST.

The net amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the ATO is included as a current asset or liability in the balance sheet.

Cash flows are included in the cash flow statement on a gross basis.The GST components of cash flows arising from investing
and financing activities which are recoverable from, or payable to, the ATO are classified as operating cash flows.

(k) Taxation

The Economic Entity adopts the liability method of tax-effect accounting whereby the income tax expense is based on the
profit from ordinary activities adjusted for any non-assessable or disallowed items.

Deferred tax is accounted for using the balance sheet liability method in respect of temporary differences arising between the
tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the financial statements. No deferred income tax will be
recognised from the initial recognition of an asset or liability, excluding a business combination, where there is no effect on
accounting or taxable profit or loss.

Deferred tax is calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the period when the asset is realised or liability is
settled. Deferred tax is credited in the income statement except where it relates to items that may be credited directly to
equity, in which case the deferred tax is adjusted directly against equity.

Deferred income tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that future tax profits will be available against
which deductible temporary differences can be utilised.

22

N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

1. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (COnt’d)

The amount of benefits brought to account or which may be realised in the future is based on the assumption that no adverse
change will occur in income taxation legislation and the anticipation that the Economic Entity will derive sufficient future
assessable income to enable the benefit to be realised and comply with the conditions of deductibility imposed by the law.

(l) Foreign Currency

All foreign currency transactions during the financial year are brought to account using the exchange rate in effect at the date
of the transaction. Foreign currency monetary items at reporting date are translated at the exchange rate existing at that date.

(m) Trade and Other Payables

Trade payables and other payables are carried at amortised costs and represent liabilities for goods and services provided to
the company prior to the end of the financial year that are unpaid and arise when the company becomes obliged to make
future payments in respect of the purchase of these goods and services.

(n) Provisions

Provisions are recognised when the Economic Entity has a present obligation, the future sacrifice of economic benefits is
probable, and the amount of the provision can be reliably measured.

The amount recognised as a provision is the best estimate of the consideration required to settle the present obligation at
reporting date, taking into account the risks and uncertainties surrounding the obligation. Where a provision is measured using
the cash flows estimated to settle the present obligation, its carrying amount is the present value of those cash flows.

(o) Share Based Payments

Equity-settled share based payments granted after 7 November 2002 that were unvested as of 1 January 2005, are measured
at fair value at the date of grant. Fair value is measured by use of a binomial model.The expected life used in the model has
been adjusted, based on management’s best estimate, for the effects of non-transferability, exercise restrictions, and
behavioural considerations.

The fair value determined at the grant date of the equity-settled share-based payments is expensed on a straight-line basis
over the vesting period, based on the Economic Entity’s estimate of shares that will eventually vest.

For cash-settled share-based payments, a liability equal to the portion of the goods or services received is recognised at the
current fair value determined at each reporting date.

(p) Issued Capital

Issued and paid up capital is recognised at the fair value of the consideration received by the Company. Any transaction costs
arising on the issue of ordinary shares are recognised directly in equity as a reduction of the share proceeds received.

23

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S

(q) Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is calculated as net earnings attributable to members, adjusted to exclude costs of servicing equity
(other than dividends) and preference share dividends, divided by the weighted average number of ordinary shares, adjusted
for an bonus element.

Diluted EPS is calculated as net earnings attributable to members, adjusted for: costs of servicing equity (other than dividends)
and preference share dividends; the after tax effect of dividends and interest associated with dilutive potential ordinary shares
that would have been recognised as expenses; and other non-discretionary changes in revenues or expenses during the period
that would result from the dilution of potential ordinary shares; divided by the weighted average number of ordinary shares
and dilutive potential ordinary shares, adjusted for any bonus element.

(r) Employee Benefits

Provision is made for the Economic Entity’s liability for employee benefits arising from services rendered by employees to
balance date. Employee benefits that are expected to be settled within one year have been measured at the amounts
expected to be paid when the liability is settled, plus related on-costs. Employee benefits payable later than one year have been
measured at the present value of the estimated future cash outflows to be made for those benefits.
CIES (Cont’d)

(s) Joint Venture Entities

A joint venture entity is an entity in which Cazaly holds a long-term interest and which is jointly controlled by Cazaly and one
or more other venturers. Decisions regarding the financial and operating policies essential to the activities, economic
performance and financial position of that venture require the consent of each of the venturers that together jointly control
the entity.

Cazaly has certain contractual arrangements with other participants to engage in joint activities where all significant matters of
operating and financial policy are determined by the participants such that the operation itself has no significant independence
to pursue its own commercial strategy.These contractual arrangements do not create a joint venture entity due to the fact that
the policies are those of the participants, not a separate entity carrying on a trade or a business of its own.

The financial statements of Cazaly include its share of the assets, liabilities and cash flows in such joint venture operations,
measured in accordance with the terms of each arrangement, which is usually pro-rata to Cazaly’s interest in the joint venture
operations.

(t) Royalty Assets

Royalty assets are valued in the accounts at cost of acquisition and are amortised over the period in which their benefits are
expected to be realised.The balances are reviewed annually and any balance representing future benefits for which the
realisation is considered to be no longer probable are written off.

24

N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

Economic Entity

Parent Entity

2007
$

2006
$

2007
$

2006
$

2. REVENUE

Revenue from Operating activities
- interest received
- option fees

Other Income
- profit on sale of tenement
- profit on sale of shares
- fair value gains on other financial 
assets at fair value through profit 
and loss

- other revenue

3. LOSS FOR THE YEAR

62,402
500
62,902

1,107,366
764,483

2,471,792
358,290
4,701,931

71,619
155,000
226,619

-
147,412

-
2,184,119
2,331,531

61,762
500
62,262

2,366
763,533

1,892,415
358,290
3,016,604

71,619
55,000
126,619

-
147,412

-
2,184,119
2,331,531

(i) Expenses

Borrowing costs
- other persons

3,275

3,705

3,275

3,705

Depreciation of non-current assets
- plant and equipment
- amortisation of leasehold 

improvements

Rental expense on operating leases
- minimum lease payments

Write down of investments

17,891

-
17,891

32,725

-

23,933

-
23,933

38,609

169,289

17,891

-
17,891

32,725

-

23,933

-
23,933

38,609

167,489

Exploration expense written off

915,570

5,748,231

28,608

4,997,464

Employee equity settled benefits

662,423

1,464,300

662,423

1,464,300

25

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S

4. KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL COMPENSATION

a) Name and positions held by directors’ in office at any time during the financial year are:

Mr Nathan McMahon
Mr Clive Jones
Mr Kent Hunter

Managing Director 
Managing Director 
Director 

b) Details of the nature and amount of emoluments of each director are as follows:

Short-term employee benefits
Post-employment benefits
Share based payments

2007

427,827
2,250
484,000
914,077

2006

402,077
2,250
1,464,300
1,868,627

The Company has taken advantage of the relief provided by Corporations Regulation 2M.6.04 and has transferred the detailed
remuneration disclosures to the directors’ report.The relevant information can be found in the remuneration report on pages
8 to 10 of the directors report.

c) Shareholdings

Number of Shares held by Directors and Executives:

2007

Balance
1.7.06

Received as
Remuneration

Options
Exercised

Net Change
- Other

N B McMahon
C B Jones
K M Hunter

5,376,128
4,100,001
1,078,066
10,554,195

-
-
-
-

500,000
-
250,000
750,000

(365,218)
-
-
(365,218)

2006

Balance
1.7.05

Received as
Remuneration

Options
Exercised

Net Change
- Other

N B McMahon
C B Jones
K M Hunter

5,239,688
4,050,001
877,300
10,166,989

d) Option Holdings

-
-
-
-

136,440
50,000
175,766
362,206

-
-
25,000
25,000

Balance
30.06.07

5,510,910
4,100,001
1,328,066
10,938,977

Balance
30.06.06

5,376,128
4,100,001
1,078,066
10,554,195

Number of $0.2938 (formerly $0.3502) Options expiring 31 August 2007, held by Directors and Executives:

Nathan McMahon
Clive Jones
Kent Hunter

Balance
1 July 06

1,000,000
1,000,000
250,000
2,250,000

Issued

-
-
-
-

Option
Exercised

-
-
(250,000)
(250,000)

Lapsed

-
-
-
-

Balance
30 June 07

1,000,000
1,000,000
-
2,000,000

26

N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

4. KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL COMPENSATION (Cont’d)

Number of $0.4436 (formerly $0.50) Options expiring 31 August 2008, held by Directors and Executives:

Nathan McMahon
Clive Jones
Kent Hunter

Balance
1 July 06

1,000,000
1,000,000
250,000
2,250,000

Issued

-
-
-
-

Option
Exercised

(500,000)
-
-
(500,000)

Lapsed

-
-
-
-

Number of $2.00 Options expiring 30 November 2009, held by Directors and Executives:

Balance
1 July 06

Issued

Option
Exercised

Lapsed

Nathan McMahon
Clive Jones
Kent Hunter

-
-
-
-

1,000,000
1,000,000
200,000
2,200,000

e) Compensation Options

-
-
-
-

-
-
-
-

Balance
30 June 07

500,000
1,000,000
250,000
1,750,000

Balance
30 June 07

1,000,000
1,000,000
200,000
2,200,000

The following table illustrates details of compensation options granted to Directors and Executives during the financial year:

2007

Number 
Granted

Number
Vested

Grant 
Date

Expiry
Date

Exercise
Price

N B McMahon
C B Jones
K M Hunter

1,000,000
1,000,000
200,000
2,200,000

1,000,000
1,000,000
200,000
2,200,000

11.12.2006
11.12.2006
11.12.2006

30.11.2009
30.11.2009
30.11.2009

$

$2.00
$2.00
$2.00

Fair Value
at Grant
Date
$

0.22
0.22
0.22

The weighted average fair value of the share options granted during the financial year is $0.22 each. All options granted during
the year vested immediately. Options were priced using binomial option pricing model. Details of factors used to calculated fair
value of these options are disclosed in note (e) (i) below.

2006

Number 
Granted

Number
Vested

Grant 
Date

Expiry
Date

Exercise
Price

N B McMahon
C B Jones
K M Hunter

1,000,000
1,000,000
250,000
2,250,000

1,000,000
1,000,000
250,000
2,250,000

30.11.2005
30.11.2005
30.11.2005

31.08.2008
31.08.2008
31.08.2008

$

0.4436
0.4436
0.4436

Fair Value
at Grant
Date
$

0.6508
0.6508
0.6508

27

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S

(i) Director and Executives’ Option Valuation Calculation

Grant date share price
Exercise price
Expected volatility
Option life 
Dividend yield
Risk-free interest rate 

2007
30.11.09 Options

2006
31.08.08 Options

$0.605
$2.00
120%
2.92 years
-
5.71%

$0.975
$0.50
75%
2.75 years
-
5.34%

f) Shares issued on exercise of compensation options

N B McMahon
K M Hunter

Date of exercise of  Number of ordinary shares issued

options

on exercise of options during the year

2007

21 June 2007
29 June 2007

500,000
250,000

2006

-
-

The economic entity policy for determining the nature and amount of emoluments of board members and senior executives
of the company is as follows:

The remuneration structure for executive officers, including executive directors, is based on a number of factors, including
length of service, particular experience of the individual concerned, and overall performance of the economic entity.The
contracts for service between the economic entity and specified directors and executives are on a continuing basis the terms
of which are not expected to change in the immediate future. Upon retirement specified directors and executives are paid
employee benefit entitlements accrued to date of retirement.The company may terminate the contracts without cause by
providing one to three months written notice or making payment in lieu of notice based on the individual’s annual salary
component at industry award redundancy rates.

Economic Entity

Parent Entity

2007
$

2006
$

2007
$

2006
$

5. AUDITORS’ REMUNERATION

Remuneration of the auditor for:
- Auditing or reviewing the 

financial report
- Other services

26,437
-
26,437

13,950
-
13,950

26,437
-
26,437

13,950
-
13,950

28

N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

6. INCOME TAX EXPENSE

The components of the 
tax expense/(income) comprise:
Current tax
Deferred tax

Economic Entity

Parent Entity

2007
$

-
1,038,375
1,038,375

2006
$

-
299,912
299,912

2007
$

-
764,002
764,002

2006
$

-
(779,828)
(779,828)

(a) The prima facie tax on loss from ordinary activities before income tax is reconciled to the income tax as follows:

Prima facie tax (benefit) on loss from 
ordinary activities before income tax 
at 30% (2005: 30%)

Add:
Tax effect of:
Other non-allowable items
Tax benefit of revenue losses 
not recognised
Effect of deferred tax assets 
not recognised
Loan writedown to subsidiaries in 
tax consolidated group
Under provision of prior year
Other

Less:
Tax effect of:
Tax benefit of deductible equity 
raising costs 
Recognition of previously 
unrecognised losses
Recognition of subsidiary tax losses
Adjustments in respect of subsidiaries
Tax exempt revenues
Other
Income tax attributable to entity

670,910

(1,820,408)

(112,998)

(1,623,964)

391,576

2,016,065

204,510

2,016,065

-

-

-
269,490
-

-

-

-
-
127,856

-

-

545,568
269,490
-

-

-

-
-
127,856

(23,601)

(23,601)

(23,601)

(23,601)

-
-
-
(270,000)
-
1,038,375

-
-
-
-
-
299,912

-
151,033
-
(270,000)
-
764,002

-
(283,206)
(992,978)
-
-
(779,828)

29

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S

Economic Entity

Parent Entity

2007
$

2006
$

2007
$

2006
$

(b) Deferred tax assets at 30% (2005: 30%) comprise the following:

Carry forward revenue losses
Carry forward capital losses
Capital raising costs
Provisions and accruals
Other

1,198,117
40,090
33,945
18,678
84,198
1,375,028

1,149,641
-
57,545
13,166
138,075
1,358,427

(c) Deferred tax liabilities at 30% (2005: 30%) comprise the following:

Exploration expenditure
Investments
Other

2,136,551
602,575
1,531
2,740,657

1,662,082
-
-
1,662,082

1,198,117
40,090
33,945
18,678
84,000
1,374,830

955,515
429,302
1,531
1,386,348

(d) The following deferred tax balances at 30% (2005: 30%) have not been recognised:

Carry forward revenue losses
Capital raising costs
Provisions and accruals
Other

-
-
-
-
-

-
-
-
-
-

-
-
-
-
-

1,149,641
-
57,545
13,166
137,535
1,357,887

581,802
-
-
581,802

-
-
-
-
-

The tax benefits of the above Deferred Tax Assets will only be obtained if:
(a) the company derives future assessable income of a nature and of an amount sufficient to enable the benefits to be utilised;
(b) the company continues to comply with the conditions for deductibility imposed by law; and
(c) no changes in income tax legislation adversely affect the company in utilising the benefits.

Deferred Tax Liabilities:
Exploration expenditure
Other

-
-
-

-
-
-

-
-
-

-
-
-

The above Deferred Tax Liabilities have not been recognised as they have given rise to the carry forward revenue losses for
which the Deferred Tax Asset has not been recognised.

Deferred tax recognised directly in equity:

Relating to equity raising costs
Other

23,601
-
23,601

3,742
-
3,742

23,601
-
23,601

3,742
-
3,742

30

N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

Economic Entity

Parent Entity

2007
$

2006
$

7. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

Cash at bank
Petty cash
Deposits at call (i)

397,802
500
147,511
545,813

138,820
500
1,381,205
1,520,525

2007
$

397,802
500
109,511
507,813

2006
$

138,820
500
1,343,205
1,482,525

(i) The bank deposits are short term deposits maturing within 30 days, and pay interest at a rate of 6.30% per annum.

8. TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES

Current
Other debtors

Non-Current
Bonds (i)
Loans to other entities
Loans to associated entities

135,793

63,758

132,049

63,757

-
-
-
-

16,000
-
-
16,000

-
-
3,349,636
3,349,636

16,000
-
4,433,382
4,449,382

(i) Bonds are term deposits, held by way of bank guarantee.

9. FINANCIAL ASSETS

Current
Shares in associated entities, at cost
Shares in listed corporations 
at fair value through profit and loss

-

2,000,000

-

2,000,000

3,076,293
3,076,293

760,075
2,760,075

1,796,754
1,796,754

671,097
2,671,097

31

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S

10. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Economic Entity

Parent Entity

Plant and Equipment
At cost
Accumulated depreciation

Office Furniture and Equipment
At cost
Accumulated depreciation

Motor Vehicle
At cost
Accumulated depreciation

Leasehold Improvement
At cost
Accumulated amortisation

2007
$

92,794
(69,053)
23,741

26,190
(10,825)
15,365

27,272
(16,185)
11,087

5,344
(5,344)
-
50,193

2006
$

82,407
(57,541)
24,866

19,464
(7,652)
11,812

27,273
(12,980)
14,293

5,344
(5,344)
-
50,971

2007
$

92,794
(69,053)
23,741

26,190
(10,825)
15,365

27,272
(16,185)
11,087

5,344
(5,344)
-
50,193

2006
$

82,407
(57,541)
24,866

19,464
(7,652)
11,812

27,273
(12,980)
14,293

5,344
(5,344)
-
50,971

Movement in the carrying amounts for each class of plant and equipment between the beginning and end of the current
financial year.

2007

Plant and 
equipment

$

Field 
Plant &
Equipment
$

$

$

Office
Furniture

Motor
Vehicles

Leashold
Improvement

Total

Balance at the 
beginning of the year
Additions
Disposals
Depreciation/expense
Carrying amount at the 
end of the year

24,866
10,386
-
(11,511)

23,741

-
-
-
-

-

11,812
6,727
-
(3,174)

14,293
-
-
(3,206)

15,365

11,087

$

-
-
-
-

-

$

50,971
17,113
-
(17,891)

50,193

32

N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

10. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (Cont’d.)

2006

Plant and 
equipment

$

Field 
Plant &
Equipment
$

Office
Furniture

Motor
Vehicles

Leashold
Improvement

Total

$

$

$

$

Balance at the beginning 
of the year
Additions
Disposals
Depreciation/expense
Carrying amount at the 
end of the year

35,414
5,954
-
(16,502)

280,000
-
(280,000)
-

14,396
-
-
(2,584)

18,428

-
(4,135)

712
-
-
(712)

348,950
5,954
(280,000)
(23,933)

24,866

-

11,812

14,293

-

50,971

11. EXPLORATION, EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS

Economic Entity

Parent Entity

2007
$

2006
$

2007
$

2006
$

Non-Current
Costs carried forward in respect 
of areas of interest in:

- Exploration and evaluation 

phases – at cost – (a)

- Royalty assets

Movement
(a) Brought forward
Exploration expenditure 
capitalised during the year
Exploration expenditure 
written off
Exploration expenditure 
transferred to controlled entity

7,121,840
47,000
7,168,840

5,821,152
47,000
5,868,152

3,185,052
-
3,185,052

2,219,339

2,219,339

-

5,821,152

4,385,198

2,219,339

1,075,273

2,216,258

7,184,185

994,321

6,141,531

(915,570)

(5,748,231)

(28,608)

(4,997,464)

-
7,121,840

-
5,821,152

-
3,185,052

-
2,219,339

The value of the economic entity interest in exploration expenditure is dependent upon:

• the continuance of the economic entity rights to tenure of the areas of interest;
• the results of future exploration; and
• the recoupment of costs through successful development and exploitation of the areas of interest, or alternatively, by their sale.

The economic entity exploration properties may be subjected to claim(s) under native title, or contain sacred sites, or sites of
significance to Aboriginal people. As a result, exploration properties or areas within the tenements may be subject to
exploration restrictions, mining restrictions and/or claims for compensation. At this time, it is not possible to quantify whether
such claims exist, or the quantum of such claims.

33

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S

Economic Entity

Parent Entity

2007
$

2006
$

2007
$

2006
$

12. TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES

Current
Unsecured
Trade creditors 
Other creditors and 
accrued expenses

13. PROVISION

Current
Provision for Annual Leave 

14. ISSUED CAPITAL

52,877,456 Fully paid ordinary shares 
(2006: 51,377,456) – (a)
Listed Options (2006: Nil) – (b)

(a) Movements in Ordinary Shares

200,659

170,033
370,692

150,451

41,730
192,181

200,659

170,033
370,692

150,451

41,730
192,181

27,123

25,670

27,123

25,670

4,969,582
-
4,969,582

7,012,583
-
7,012,583

4,969,582
-
4,969,582

7,012,583
-
7,012,583

Notes

Number of 
shares

Issue 
price

$

51,377,456

-

7,012,583

1 July 2006
11 December 2006

29 January 2007
29 January 2007
20 March 2007
21 June 2007
21 June 2007
29 June 2007

Opening balance
Capital reduction pursuant to
in-specie distribution of
Newera Uranium Ltd
Exercise of options
Transfer from option reserve
Exercise of options
Exercise of options
Transfer from option reserve
Exercise of options
Transaction costs relating 
to share issues
Deferred tax liability 
component

(i)
(ii)

(iii)

(v)

(vi)

-
500,000
-
250,000
500,000
-
250,000

-

-

-
$0.35
-

$0.1938
$0.4436

-

$0.2938

-

-

(2,900,000)
175,000
36,500
48,450
221,800
325,400
73,450

-

(23,601)

4,969,582

30 June 2007

Closing balance

52,877,456

(i) On 11 January 2007, the Company announced it had completed the in-specie distribution of Newera Uranium Limited

shares, as approved at the General Meeting of Shareholders on 18 August 2006.

(ii) On 29 January 2007, the Company issued ordinary shares 500,000 following the exercise of 35 cent options with an expiry

date of 15 September 2008.

(iii) On 20 March 2007, the Company issued 250,000 ordinary shares following the exercise of 19.38 cent options with an

expiry date of 2 July 2009.

34

N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

14. ISSUED CAPITAL (Cont’d)

(iv) On 21 June 2007, the Company issued 500,000 ordinary shares to Nathan McMahon following the exercise of 44.36

options with an expiry date of 31 August 2008.

(v) On 29 June 2007, the Company issued 250,000 ordinary shares to Kent Hunter following the exercise of 29.38 options

with an expiry date of 31 August 2008.

(vi) Deferred tax recognised directly in equity relating to equity raising costs

Ordinary shares participate in dividends and the proceeds on winding up of the Company in proportion to the number of
shares held and in proportion to the amount paid up on the shares held.

At shareholders meetings each ordinary share is entitled to one vote in proportion to the paid up amount of the share when
a poll is called, otherwise each shareholder has one vote on a show of hands.

Economic Entity

Parent Entity

2007
$

2006
$

2007
$

2006
$

15. OPTION RESERVE

Balance at beginning of 
reporting period
Directors options
Employee equity settled transactions
Options issued to Echelon Resources 
as per Agreement dated 
28 November 2005
Transfer to share capital 
options exercised

6,463,924
484,000
178,422

-
1,464,300
11,124

6,463,924
484,000
178,422

-
1,464,300
11,124

-

4,988,500

-

4,988,500

(361,900)
6,764,446

-
6,463,924

(361,900)
6,764,446

-
6,463,924

This reserve is used to record the value of equity benefits provided to the employees and directors as part of their remuneration.

16. RETAINED PROFITS/ (ACCUMULATED LOSSES)

Retained profits/(Accumulated losses) 
at the beginning 
of the financial period
Net profit/(loss) attributable 
to members
Accumulated losses
at the end of the financial period

(3,718,532)

1,197,992

(2,520,540)

2,651,413

(1,981,202)

2,652,183

(6,369,945)

(1,140,662)

(4,633,385)

(3,718,532)

(3,121,864)

(1,981,202)

35

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S

17. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The economic entity’s principal financial instruments comprise cash and short term deposits.The main purpose of the financial
instruments is to earn the maximum amount of interest at a low risk to the entity.The economic entity also has other financial
instruments such as trade debtors and creditors which arise directly from its operations. For the period under review, it has
been the entity’s policy not to trade in financial instruments.

The main risks arising from the economic entity’s financial instruments are interest rate risk and credit risk.The board reviews
and agrees policies for managing each of these risks and they are summarised below:

(a) Interest Rate Risk
The economic entity’s exposure to interest rate risk, which is the risk that a financial instrument’s value will fluctuate as a result
of changes in market interest rates and the effective weighted average interest rate for each class of financial assets and
financial liabilities comprises:

Fixed Interest
maturing in
1 year or less
$

Fixed Interest
maturing over
1 to 5 years
$

2007

Financial assets
Cash
Receivables
Investments

Weighted average
Interest rate

Financial Liabilities
Payables

Weighted average
interest rate

2006

Financial assets
Cash
Receivables
Investments

Weighted average
Interest rate

Financial Liabilities
Payables

Weighted average 
interest rate

Floating
Interest
Rate
$

147,501
-
-
147,501

-
-

-

Floating
Interest
Rate
$

139,320
-
-
139,320

4.25%

6.30%

397,802
-
-
397,802

-
-

-

1,381,205
16,000
-
1,397,205

5.00%

5.77%

-
-

-

-
-

-

Non-
Interest
bearing
$

500
135,793
3,076,293
3,212,586

-

370,692
370,692

-

Non-
Interest
bearing
$

-
63,758
2,760,075
2,823,833

-

192,181
192,181

-

2007
Total

$

545,803
135,793
3,076,293
3,757,889

370,692
370,692

2006
Total

$

1,520,525
79,758
2,760,075
4,360,358

192,181
192,181

-
-
-
-

-

-
-

-

-
-
-
-

-

-
-

-

Fixed Interest
maturing in
1 year or less
$

Fixed Interest
maturing over
1 to 5 years
$

36

N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

17. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (Cont’d)

(b) Net Fair Values

The carrying value and net fair values of financial assets and liabilities at balance date are:

2007

2006

Carrying
Amount
$

545,813
135,793
3,076,293
3,757,899

370,690
-
370,690

Net Fair
Value
$

545,813
135,793
3,076,293
3,757,899

370,690
-
370,690

Carrying
Amount
$

1,520,525
79,758
2,760,075
4,360,358

192,181
-
192,181

Net Fair
Value
$

1,520,525
79,758
2,760,075
4,360,358

192,181
-
192,181

Financial assets
Cash and deposits
Receivables
Investments

Financial liabilities
Payables
Interest bearing liabilities

(c) Credit Risk

Credit risk refers to the risk that a counterparty will default on its contractual obligations resulting in financial loss to the
economic entity.The economic entity has adopted the policy of only dealing with credit worthy counterparties and obtaining
sufficient collateral or other security where appropriate, as a means of mitigating the risk of financial loss from defaults.

The economic entity does not have any significant credit risk exposure to any single counterparty or any group of
conterparties having similar characteristics.The carrying amount of financial assets recorded in the financial statements, net of
any provisions for losses, represents the economic entity maximum exposure to credit risk.

18.

EARNINGS PER SHARE

Economic Entity

Carrying
Amount
$

Net Fair
Value
$

(a) Earnings / (Loss) used in the calculation of basic EPS

1,197,992

(6,369,945)

Number of
Shares

Number of
Shares

(b) Weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding 

during the period used in the calculation of basic earnings per share:

51,664,544

45,757,021

37

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S

Economic Entity

Parent Entity

2007
$

2006
$

2007
$

2006
$

19. CASH FLOW INFORMATION

(i) Reconciliation of cash flows from 

operating activities with profit/(loss) 
after income tax

Profit / (Loss) after income tax

1,197,992

(6,369,945)

(1,140,662)

(4,633,385)

Non-cash flows in loss for the year
Depreciation
Profit on sale of shares
Employee equity 
settled transactions
Share based payments
Fair value adjustment 
to investments
Provision for diminution of loans
Profit on sale of tenements
Exploration write-off

17,891
(764,483)

530,000
132,423

(2,471,793)
-
(1,107,366)
915,570

23,933
(147,412)

1,464,300
256,250

(2,014,830)
-
-
5,748,231

17,891
(763,533)

530,000
132,423

(1,892,416)
1,818,561
(2,366)
28,608

23,933
(147,412)

1,464,300
256,250

(2,014,830)
-
-
4,997,464

Cash flows not in loss for the year
Payments for exploration 
and evaluation

Changes in assets and liabilities
Decrease/(Increase) in receivables 
& prepayments
Increase/(Decrease) in trade 
and other creditors, accruals 
and employee entitlements
Movement in provisions
Increase in deferred tax assets
Increase in deferred tax liabilities

Net cash inflows (outflows) 
from operating Activities

ii) Acquisition of Entities

(2,233,536)

(2,383,873)

(1,011,600)

(1,341,217)

(56,038)

245,318

(52,293)

245,320

198,156
1,453
(16,337)
1,054,712

474,972
(9,789)
-
-

198,156
1,453
(16,943)
780,945

(604,768)
(9,789)
-
-

(2,601,356)

(2,712,845)

(1,371,776)

(1,765,935)

During the year 100% of the following controlled entities were acquired:

Purchase consideration
- Hayes Mining Pty Ltd
- Cazaly Iron Pty Ltd
- Sammy Resources Pty Ltd

-
-
-

-
-
-

-
1
1

-
1
1

38

N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

20. COMMITMENTS

On 10 November 2003 the economic entity entered into a lease agreement with Giorgio Longo and Clotilda Aurora Longo
for the premises known as entire First Floor, 22 Oxford Close, Leederville, Western Australia.The initial term, is for two (2) years
expiring on 30 September 2006 in consideration for a rental fee of $30,000 per annum.The economic entity has negotiated an
extension of the lease agreement with Giorgio Longo until 30 September 2010 for a rental fee of $60,000 per annum.

The commitments outlined below are contingent on the economic entity exercising its rights to acquire exploration assets
pursuant to option agreements detailed below.

In order to maintain rights of tenure to mining tenements subject to these agreements, the economic entity would have the
following discretionary exploration expenditure requirements up until expiry of leases.These obligations, which are subject 
to renegotiation upon expiry of the leases, are not provided for in the financial statements and are payable:

Not longer than one year
Longer than one year, but not longer than five years
Longer than five years

2007
$

664,630
2,658,520
-
3,323,150

2006
$

2,705,180
2,705,180
2,705,180
8,115,540

At the moment the economic entity has commitments in excess of cash, however the Board believes it will be able to raise
the additional funds to satisfy the commitments for the future.

If the economic entity decides to relinquish certain leases and/or does not meet these obligations, assets recognised in the
balance sheet may require review to determine the appropriateness of carrying values.The sale, transfer or farm-out of
exploration rights to third parties will reduce or extinguish these obligations.

Joint Venture Commitments

The economic entity has entered into the following joint ventures:

CARBINE WEST KALGOORLIE JOINT VENTURE

Cazaly has reached Agreement with Carbine Resources Ltd whereby Carbine will earn a 50 percent stake, with an option to
increase to 70 percent, in Cazaly’s entire gold exploration and development portfolio in the Kunanalling, Ora Banda, Grants
Patch, Carbine and Split Rocks regions.These tenements cover approximately 533 square kilometers and contain mineral
resources of 612,400 ounces of gold.

This agreement combines the project development skills of Carbine with the geology, exploration and tenement management
prowess of Cazaly.

1. Carbine will pay Cazaly a management fee of $41,700 per month over a period of 12 months commencing from the date

that the agreement is formalised.

2. Carbine will issue Cazaly with 2,000,000 ordinary fully paid shares in Carbine, with these shares voluntarily escrowed for a

period of 6 months.

3. On or before the first anniversary of the agreement, Carbine will pay a further $1,000,000 either, at Carbine’s election, by
cash or by 50/50 combined cash and Carbine shares, with the issue price of the shares being the 30-day volume weighted
average price (30 day VWAP) as calculated on the day prior to payment date.This payment will give Carbine an initial 35%
stake in the projects.

39

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S

4. Carbine undertakes to fund exploration on the project areas equivalent to $4,500,000 over a period of no more than 36
months after the date of the agreement. On completion of this expenditure commitment, Carbine will have earned a 50%
stake in the projects.

5. Any mine developments on the project areas will be funded entirely by Carbine. Carbine will then be entitled to recoup its

investment (included accumulated interest charges) before sharing operating cash flows on a 50/50 basis with Cazaly.

6. Carbine will assume the role of Manager of the joint venture on completion of the payments mentioned in item 1.To that

end it has undertaken to use the professional services of Cazaly’s existing geology team and has agreed to reimburse Cazaly
direct costs plus 12 percent management fee for these services.

7. Any proceeds from the agreed sale, transfer or relinquishment of tenements in the project areas during the period up to

completion of the earn-in commitments, shall be shared 50% Cazaly, 50% Carbine.

PLACER DOME ASIA PACIFIC – KUNUNALLING PROJECT

On 9 December 2003 Cazaly acquired the Kunanalling project from Placer Dome Asia Pacific Limited (“PDAP”) whereby
Cazaly is the register holder or is entitled to be registered of the holder and beneficial owner of the Kunanalling project and
Tenements. A payment sum of $57,000 and assignment to Cazaly 100% interest in the Kunanalling Project provided that PDAP
will retain;
(i)

the once off right exercisable within 60 days of being notified of the establishment of 500,000 or more once resources on
the Kunanalling Project to clawback a 70% interest in respect of the resource area.

(ii) PDAP the right to explore for conceptual targets within a declared area of the Kunanalling Project at Cazaly Resources Ltd
Expense. Any discovery of 500,000 or more ounces would be deemed to be owned 70% by PDAP and 30% by Cazaly
Resources. Any resource discovery of less than 500,000 ounces would continue to be 100% owned by Cazaly Resources.

(iii) the option to acquire or to process any ore produced from the project owned or acquired by Cazaly Resources within

100km of the treatment plant.

(iv) a 2% net smelter royalty on all gold produced from the Kunanalling 

NORTHLANDER PROJECT - HAMPTON HILL MINING AGREEMENT

On 5 March 2004 Cazaly acquired a 49% interest in the Northlander Project from Hampton Hill Mining NL. Hampton Hill
Mining is the registered holder or is entitled to be registered as the holder and 49% beneficial owner of the Northlander
Project and the Tenements. In consideration of Cazaly resources paying Hampton Hill Mining the sum of $21,000, Hampton Hill
Mining will assign 49% interest in the Northlander Project provided that;
(i) Hampton Hill Mining will retain the once off right within 60 days of being notified of the establishment of a 500,000 or
more ounce resource on the Northlander Project, to claw back a 34.3% interest or a 70% interest if PDAP does not
exercise its equivalent rights within the 60 day period.

(ii) a 0.98% Net Smelter Returns Royalty on all gold produced from mine within the Northlander Project.
(iii) the right to explore for conceptual targets within a declared area of the northlander Project. Any reluctant resourced

discovery of 500,000 or more ounces would be deemed to be owned 70% by Hampton hill Mining ( this will be subject
to clawback, the respective interest would then be PDAP 35.7% Hampton Hill Mining 34.5% and Cazaly Resources Ltd
30%. Any resource discovery of less than 500,000 ounces would continue to be 100% owned by Cazaly Resources.

NORTHLANDER PROJECT – PLACER DOME ASIA PACIFIC AGREEMENT

On 5th March 2004 Cazaly hereby offers to acquire a 51% interest in the Northlander Project from Placer Dome Asia Pacific
Ltd (“PDAP”). PDAP is the registered holder or is entitled to be registered as the holder and 51% beneficial owner of the
Northlander Project and the Tenements. In consideration of Cazaly resources paying PDAP the sum of $21,930, PDAP will
assign 51% interest in the Northlander Project provided that;
(i)  PDAP will retain the once off right within 60 days of being notified of the establishment of a 500,000 or more ounce

resource on the Northlander Project, to claw back a 35.7% interest or a 70% interest if Hampton Hill Mining NL does not
exercise its equivalent rights within the 60 day period.

(ii) a 1.02% Net Smelter Returns Royalty on all gold produced from mine within the Northlander Project.
(iii) the right to explore for conceptual targets within a declared area of the northlander Project. Any reluctant resourced

discovery of 500,000 or more ounces would be deemed to be owned 70% by Hampton hill Mining ( this will be subject
to clawback, the respective interest would then be PDAP 35.7% Hampton Hill Mining 34.5% and Cazaly Resources Ltd
30%. Any resource discovery of less than 500,000 ounces would continue to be 100% owned by Cazaly Resources.

40

N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

20. COMMITMENTS (CONT’d)

WEST KALGOORLIE PROJECT (ORA BANDA, GRANTS PATCH, CARBINE PROJECTS) – PLACER
DOME ASIA PACIFIC AGREEMENT

On 13th September 2004 Cazaly acquired the West Kalgoorlie project from PDAP whereby Cazaly is the register holder or
is entitled to be registered of the holder and beneficial owner of the Kunanalling project and Tenements. A payment to PDAP
of $1,000 was the consideration for the assignment to Cazaly 100% interest in the Kunanalling Project provided that PDAP
will retain;
(i) the once off right exercisable within 60 days of being notified of the establishment of 300,000 or more once resources on
the Kunanalling Project to clawback a 70% interest in respect of the resource area by the reimbursement of 2.5 times the
previous exploration costs.

(ii) PDAP the right to explore for conceptual targets within a declared area of the West Kalgoorlie Project at Cazaly Resources
Ltd Expense. Any discovery of 300,000 or more ounces would be deemed to be owned 70% by PDAP and 30% by Cazaly
Resources. Any resource discovery of less than 300,000 ounces would continue to be 100% owned by Cazaly Resources.

(iii) the option to acquire or to process any ore produced from the project owned or acquired by Cazaly Resources within

100km of the treatment plant.

(iv) a 2% net smelter royalty on all gold produced from the West Kalgoorlie project except where a pre-existing royalty exists.

CASTLE HILL PROJECT – PLACER DOME ASIA PACIFIC AGREEMENT

On 13th September 2004 Cazaly acquired the West Kalgoorlie project from PDAP whereby Cazaly is the register holder or is
entitled to be registered of the holder and beneficial owner of the Kunanalling project and Tenements. A payment to PDAP of
$1,000 was the consideration for the assignment to Cazaly 100% interest in the Kunanalling Project provided that PDAP will retain;
(i) the once off right exercisable within 60 days of being notified of the establishment of 300,000 or more once resources on
the Kunanalling Project to clawback a 70% interest in respect of the resource area by the reimbursement of 2.5 times the
previous exploration costs.

(ii) PDAP the right to explore for conceptual targets within a declared area of the West Kalgoorlie Project at Cazaly Resources
Ltd Expense. Any discovery of 300,000 or more ounces would be deemed to be owned 70% by PDAP and 30% by Cazaly
Resources. Any resource discovery of less than 300,000 ounces would continue to be 100% owned by Cazaly Resources.

(iii) the option to acquire or to process any ore produced from the project owned or acquired by Cazaly Resources within

100km of the treatment plant.

(iv) a 2% net smelter royalty on all gold produced from the Castle Hill project except where a pre-existing royalty exists.

In each of the Kununalling, West Kalgoorlie, Northlander and Castle Hill Agreements there are several smaller, non-material
royalty provisions that encumber the tenements.

ECHELON JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT

In consideration for Echelon committing to provide technical capabilities and funding $2.5 million in exploration funds for the
Shovelanna project, Echelon will receive a 14% interest in ELA 46/678 and receive 5 million options in Cazaly, exercisable at
$1.00, on or before 31 December 2007.

JILLEWARRA JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT

The Company accepted an offer from Red Emperor Resources NL to farm in to the Jillewarra copper/gold project.The
Company will receive cash of $100,000 and 1,000,000 shares for the right of Red Emperor to earn 51% by the expenditure 
of $1,200,000 within 42 months of listing. Cazaly will manage this exploration.

GLOBAL NICKEL INVESTMENTS JOINT VENTURES

The Company finalised four separate Farm-In and Joint Venture Agreements with Global Nickel Investments Ltd (“GNI”) on
the following terms:

41

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S

JUTSON ROCKS PROJECT

$120,000 cash payment plus 750,000 shares for 70% of the project with the Expenditure 
Commitment of 3,000m RC within 4 years 

FORRESTANIA

$50,000 cash plus 250,000 shares for 70% of the project with the Expenditure
Commitment of $300,000 within 4 years

COSMOS NORTH AND MT. WHITE

$50,000 cash plus 250,000 shares for 70% of the project with the Expenditure
Commitment $300,000 within 4 years 

BANDALUP

$50,000 cash plus 300,000 shares for 70% of the project with the Expenditure
Commitment of $300,000 within 4 years 

GENERAL PERIPHERAL PROJECTS

Cazaly has free-carried interests in several smaller projects that are deemed to be non material at this stage.There are no
potential liabilities for Cazaly in these Agreements.

PARKER RANGE IRON ORE PROJECT

Cazaly Iron may earn an 80% interest in iron ore on the tenements by spending $1 million on exploration for iron ore within
three years.The Company will retain a 20% interest in the iron ore rights, free carried to the completion of a bankable
feasibility study.

The agreement is subject to certain conditions, including – 
(i) the placement to Cazaly Resources Limited of 8,000,000 ordinary fully paid shares in the Company at a price of 2.5 cents

per share, to take place on 15th July 2007; and 

(ii) the consent of other stakeholders in the subject tenements by not later than 30th September 2007.

21. CONTROLLED ENTITIES

Parent Entity

Country of Incorporation

Cazaly Resources Limited

Controlled Entities
Hayes Mining Pty Ltd
Cazaly Iron Pty Ltd
Sammy Resources Pty Ltd

Australia

Australia
Australia
Australia

Consolidated 
Entity Interest

2007

2006

100%
100%
100%

100%
100%
100%

On 1 July 2005 the parent entity acquired 100% of Cazaly Iron Pty Ltd, with Cazaly Resources Ltd entitled to all profits earned
from 1 July 2005, for purchase consideration of $1.00

42

N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

22. SEGMENT INFORMATION

The economic entity operates predominantly in one geographical segment, being Western Australia, and in one industry,
mineral mining and exploration.

23. EVENTS SUBSEQUENT TO REPORTING DATE

On 6 August 2007, Lisa Wynne was appointed to the role of Company Secretary following the resignation of Kent Hunter.

On 8 August 2007, the Company completed a placement of 5,750,000 ordinary shares to a range of institutional investors to
raise $3,450,000 before costs of the issue.

On 24 August 2007, the Company requested a trading halt while awaiting the Court of Appeal Hearing Judgment on the
Shovelanna tenement.The Court of Appeal refused Cazaly’s application to quash the decision of the former Minister for
Resources to terminate Cazaly’s application for Exploration Licence 46/678 (Shovelanna).

There were no other matters or circumstances that have arisen since the end of the financial period which significantly affected
or may significantly affect the operations of the Company, the results of those operations, or the state of affairs of the
Company in future financial years.

24. RELATED PARTY INFORMATION

Transactions between related parties are on commercial terms and conditions, no more favourable than those available to
other parties unless otherwise stated.

Transactions with related entities:
(i) Director related Entities

Remuneration (excluding the reimbursement of costs) received or receivable by the directors of the Economic entity and
aggregate amounts paid to superannuation plans in connection with the retirement of directors are disclosed in Note 4 to
the accounts.

These transactions were made on commercial terms and conditions and at market rates.

43

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S

26. SHARE BASED PAYMENTS 

Options are issued to vendors as part of purchase consideration and also to directors and employees as part of their
remuneration as disclosed in Note 4.The options issued may be subject to performance criteria, and are issued to directors
and employees of Cazaly Resources Limited to increase goal congruence between executives, directors and shareholders.

The following table illustrates the number and weighted average exercise prices (WAEP) of and movements in share options
issued under Share Based Payment Scheme during the year:

2007

2006

Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
$

-
0.47
0.22
0.35

Number of
Options

9,975,000

-
2,350,000
2,200,000
(1,500,000)
13,025,000
13,025,000

Number of
Options

2,650,000

5,000,000
75,000
2,250,000
-
9,975,000
9,975,000

Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
$

1.00
0.58
0.50

At beginning of reporting period
Granted during the period
- Vendor options
- Employee & consultants options
- Director remuneration
- Exercised
Balance the end of reporting period
Exercisable at end of reporting period

(i)  The compensation options outstanding at 30 June 2007 had a weighted average exercise price between $0.22 and $0.86

and a weighted average remaining life between 0.16 years and 5 years.

(ii) The respective weighted average fair values of options granted during 2007 were $0.11.
(iii) Included under employee benefits expense in the income statement is $662,423 (2006: $1,464,000), and relates to equity-

settled payment transactions.

44

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

d i r e c t o r s ’   d e c l a r a t i o n

DIRECTORS’  DECLARATION

The directors of the company declare that:

1. the financial statements and notes, as set out on pages 14 to 43, are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001:

(a) comply with Accounting Standards and the Corporations Regulations 2001; and

(b) give a true and fair view of the financial position as at 30 June 2007 and of the performance for the year ended on that

date of the company and economic entity; and

2. the Chief Executive Officer and Company Secretary have each declared that:

(a) the financial records of the company for the financial year have been properly maintained in accordance with section 286 of

the Corporations Act 2001;

(b) the financial statements and notes for the financial year comply with the Accounting Standards; and

(c) the financial statements and notes for the financial year give a true and fair view.

3. in the directors’ opinion there are reasonable grounds to believe that the company will be able to pay its debts as and when

they become due and payable.

This declaration is made in accordance with a resolution of the Board of Directors.

Kent Hunter
Director

Perth,
28 September 2007

45

INDEPENDENT AUDIT REPORT 
TO THE MEMBERS OF CAZALY RESOURCES LIMITED

We have audited the accompanying financial report of Cazaly Resources Ltd (the company) and Cazaly
Resources Ltd and Controlled Entities (the consolidated entity), which comprises the balance sheet as at 
30 June 2007, and the income statement, statement of changes in equity and cash flow statement for the
year ended on that date, a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory notes and the
directors’ declaration of the consolidated entity comprising the company and the entities it controlled at the
year’s end or from time to time during the financial year.

As permitted by the Corporations Regulations 2001, the company has disclosed information about the
remuneration of directors and executives (remuneration disclosures), required by Accounting Standard
AASB 124: Related Party Disclosures, under the heading “Remuneration Report” in the directors’ report
and not in the financial report.

Directors Responsibility for the Financial Report

The directors of the company are responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial
report in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards (including the Australian Accounting
Interpretations) and the Corporations Act 2001.This responsibility includes establishing and maintaining
internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of the financial report that is free from
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; selecting and applying appropriate accounting
policies; and making accounting estimates that are reasonable in the circumstances. In Note 1, the directors
also state, in accordance with Accounting Standards AASB 101: Presentation of Financial Statements, that
compliance with the Australian equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) ensures that
the financial report, comprising the financial statements and notes, complies with IFRS.

The directors also are responsible for preparation and presentation of the remuneration disclosures
contained in the directors’ report in accordance with the Corporations Regulations 2001.

Auditor’s Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial report based on our audit. We conducted our
audit in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards.These Auditing Standards require that we comply
with relevant ethical requirements relating to audit engagements and plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance whether the financial report is free from material misstatement and that the
remuneration disclosures in the directors’ report comply with Accounting Standard AASB 124.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the
financial report.The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the
risks of material misstatement of the financial report, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk
assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation
of the financial report in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but
not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. An audit
also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of
accounting estimates made by the directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial
report and the remuneration disclosures in the directors’ report.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for 
our audit opinion.

46

Independence

In conducting our audit, we followed applicable independence requirements of Australian professional ethical
pronouncements and the Corporations Act 2001.

Auditor’s Opinion

In our opinion:

a. the financial report of Cazaly Resources Ltd and its Controlled Entities is in accordance with the

Corporations Act 2001, including:
i. giving a true and fair view of the company’s and consolidated entity’s financial position as at 30 June

2007 and of their performance for the year ended on that date; and

ii. complying with Australian Accounting Standards (including the Australian Accounting Interpretations)

and the Corporations Regulations 2001;

b. the financial report also complies with International Financial Reporting Standards as disclosed in Note 1;

and

c. the remuneration disclosures that are contained in the directors’ report comply with Accounting Standard

AASB 124.

RIX LEVY FOWLER
Audit & Corporate Pty Ltd

RANKO MATIC
Director

DATED at PERTH this 28th day of September 2007

47

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

A D D I T I O N A L S H A R E H O L D E R I N F O R M A T I O N

ADDITIONAL SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION

Shareholding

The distribution of members and their holdings of equity securities in the company as at 25 September 2007 was as follows:

Number Held as at 22 September 2006

Class of Equity Securities
Fully Paid Ordinary Shares

1-1,000
1,001 - 5,000
5,001 – 10,000
10,001 - 100,000
100,001 and over
TOTALS

Holders of less than a marketable parcel:- fully paid shares 403

Substantial Shareholders

Substantial shareholders in the Company are set out below:

Shareholder

Herbert Management Corporation, Philip Falcon, Raymond Herbert 

Unquoted Securities

314
850
448
608
80
2,300

Number

3,263,001

Class of Equity Security

Number

Number of Security Holders

31 August 2008 Option - $0.4436
31 August 2007 Option - $0.2938
2 July 2009 Options - $0.1938
31 December 2007 Options - $0.9436
15 September 2008 Options - $0.35
5 October 2011 Options - $0.8036
15 October 2008 Options - $0.4436
30 November 2009 Options - $1.9436
19 June 2012 Options - $0.86

Voting Rights

1,750,000
1,000,000
150,000
5,000,000
500,000
100,000
1,000,000
2,200,000
250,000

The voting rights attached to each class of equity security are as follows:

Ordinary Shares

3
1
1
3
1
1
1
3
1

Each ordinary share is entitled to one vote when a poll is called, otherwise each member present at a meeting or by proxy has
one vote on a show of hands.

48

A D D I T I O N A L S H A R E H O L D E R I N F O R M A T I O N

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

Quoted and Unquoted Options

These options have no voting rights.

ASX Listing Rule 4.10.19

In accordance with Listing Rule 4.10.19, the company states that it has used the cash and assets in a form readily convertible to
cash that it had at the time of admission in a way consistent with its business objectives.The business objective is primarily
mineral exploration.

Twenty Largest Shareholders

The names of the twenty largest ordinary fully paid shareholders as at 25 September 2007are as follows:

Name

Number of Ordinary 
Fully Paid Shares Held

% Held of Issued
Ordinary Capital

Mr Clive Bruce Jones
Citicorp Nominees Pty Limited
Nathan Bruce McMahon
ANZ Nominees Limited 
Mrs Karen Cameron Murie
USB Wealth Management
Echelon Resource Limited
Mr Clive Bruce Jones
Mr Kent Michael Hunter
Richard Stanley De Ravin
Shoc Pty Ltd
Kingsreef Pty Ltd
New Horizon Investments Pty Ltd
Clear range Pty Ltd
Dr Hao Jame Kuo & Mrs Shirley Joan Kuo
Mrs Debra Lee McMahon
Mr Mervyn Leo Bassett & Mrs Shirley Ethel Bassett
Libbie Pty Limited
Mr Andrew Murie
Mrs Karen Murie & Mr Andre Murie
Mrs Debra Lee McMahon

4,050,001
3,887,715
2,700,001
2,156,700
1,275,500
1,065,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
900,000
450,000
711,276
584,244
500,000
500,000
430,140
410,934
400,000
396,000
360,500
349,500
344,128

6.792
6.520
4.528
3.617
2.139
1.786
1.677
1.677
1.509
0.875
1.193
0.980
0.839
0.839
0.721
0.689
0.671
0.664
0.605
0.586
0.577

TOTAL

19,203,159

37.365

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The Company is committed to implementing the highest standards of corporate governance. In determining what those high
standards should involve the Company has turned to the ASX Corporate Governance Council’s Principles of Good Corporate
Governance and Best Practice Recommendations.The Company is pleased to advise that the Company’s practices are largely
consistent with those ASX guidelines. As consistency with the guidelines has been a gradual process, where the Company did
not have certain policies or committees recommended by the ASX Corporate Governance Council (the Council) in place
during the reporting period, we have identified such policies or committees.

49

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

A D D I T I O N A L S H A R E H O L D E R I N F O R M A T I O N

Where the Company’s corporate governance practices do not correlate with the practices recommended by the Council, the
Company is working towards compliance however it does not consider that all the practices are appropriate for the Company
due to the size and scale of Company operations.

To illustrate where the Company has addressed each of the Council’s recommendations, the following table cross-references
each recommendation with sections of this report.The table does not provide the full text of each recommendation but rather
the topic covered. Details of all of the recommendations can be found on the ASX Corporate Governance Council’s website
at.http://www.asx.com.au/supervision/governance/index.htm 

Recommendation

Recommendation 1.1 
Recommendation 2.1 
Recommendation 2.2 
Recommendation 2.3
Recommendation 2.4 
Recommendation 2.5 

Recommendation 3.1 
Recommendation 3.2 
Recommendation 3.3 
Recommendation 4.1 
Recommendation 4.2 
Recommendation 4.3 
Recommendation 4.4 
Recommendation 4.5 
Recommendation 5.1 
Recommendation 5.2 
Recommendation 6.1 
Recommendation 6.2 
Recommendation 7.1 
Recommendation 7.2 
Recommendation 7.3 
Recommendation 8.1 
Recommendation 9.1 
Recommendation 9.2 
Recommendation 9.3 
Recommendation 9.4 
Recommendation 9.5 
Recommendation 10.1 

Functions of the Board and Management
Independent Directors
Independent Chairman
Role of the Chairman and CEO
Establishment of Nomination Committee
Reporting on Principle 2

Directors’ and Key Executives’ Code of Conduct
Company Security Trading Policy
Reporting on Principle 3
Attestations by CEO and CFO
Establishment of Audit Committee
Structure of Audit Committee
Audit Committee Charter
Reporting on Principle 4
Policy for Compliance with Continuous Disclosure
Reporting on Principle 5
Communications Strategy
Attendance of Auditor at General Meetings
Policies on Risk Oversight and Management
Attestations by CEO and CFO
Reporting on Principle 7
Evaluation of Board, Directors and Key Executives
Remuneration Policies
Establishment of Remuneration Committee
Executive and Non-Executive Director Remuneration
Equity-Based Executive Remuneration
Reporting on Principle 9
Company Code of Conduct

Section

1.1
1.2
1.2
1.2
2.3
1.2, 1.4.6, 2.3.2 and the 
Directors’ Report
1.1
1.4.9
1.1 and 1.4.9 
1.4.11
2.1
2.1.2
2.1
2.1 
1.4.4
1.4.4 
1.4.8
1.4.8
2.1.3
1.4.11
2.1.3 
1.4.10
2.2.4
2.2
2.2.4.1 and 2.2.4.2
2.2.4.1
2.2.2 and 2.2.4
3

1. Board of Directors
1.1Role of the Board
The Board’s role is to govern the Company rather than to manage it. In governing the Company, the Directors must act in the
best interests of the Company as a whole. It is the role of senior management to manage the Company in accordance with
the direction and delegations of the Board and the responsibility of the Board to oversee the activities of management in
carrying out these delegated duties.

In carrying out its governance role, the main task of the Board is to drive the performance of the Company.The Board must
also ensure that the Company complies with all of its contractual, statutory and any other legal obligations, including the
requirements of any regulatory body.The Board has the final responsibility for the successful operations of the Company.

50

A D D I T I O N A L S H A R E H O L D E R I N F O R M A T I O N

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

To assist the Board carry our its functions, it has developed a Code of Conduct to guide the Directors, the Chief Executive
Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and other key executives in the performance of their roles.

1.2 Composition of the Board
To add value to the Company the Board has been formed so that it has effective composition, size and commitment to
adequately discharge its responsibilities and duties given its current size and scale of operations.The names of the Directors
and their qualifications and experience are stated in the Directors’ Report along with the term of office held by each of the
Directors. Directors are appointed based on the specific skills required by the Company and on their decision-making and
judgment skills.

The Company recognises the importance of Non-Executive Directors and the external perspective and advice that Non-
Executive Directors can offer. Mr K Hunter is a Non-Executive Director, and is an independent director as he meets the
following criteria for independence adopted by the Company.

An Independent Director is a Non-Executive Director and:
• is not a substantial shareholder of the Company or an officer of, or otherwise associated directly with, a substantial

shareholder of the Company;

• within the last three years has not been employed in an executive capacity by the Company or another group member, or

been a Director after ceasing to hold any such employment;

• within the last three years has not been a principal of a material professional adviser or a material consultant to the

Company or another group member. Or an employee materially associated with the service provided;

• is not a material supplier or customer of the Company or another group member, or an officer of or otherwise associated

directly or indirectly with a material supplier or customer;

• has no material contractual relationship with the Company or other group member other than as a Director of 

the Company;

• has not served on the Board for a period which could, or could reasonably be perceived to, materially interfere with the

Director’s ability to act in the best interests of the Company; and

• is free from any interest and any business or other relationship which could, or could reasonably be perceived to, materially

interfere with the Director’s ability to act in the best interests of the Company.

Mr K Hunter is a Non-Executive Director of the Company and meets the Company’s criteria for independence. His
experience and knowledge of the Company makes his contribution to the Board such that it is appropriate for him to remain
on the Board.

Mr C Jones is an Executive Director of the Company and does not meet the Company’s criteria for independence. However,
his experience and knowledge of the Company makes his contribution to the Board such that it is appropriate for him to 
remain on the Board.

Mr N McMahon is an Executive Director of the Company and does not meet the Company’s criteria for independence.
However, his experience and knowledge of the Company makes his contribution to the Board such that it is appropriate for
him to remain on the Board.

1.3 Responsibilities of the Board
In general, the Board is responsible for, and has the authority to determine, all matters relating to the policies, practices,
management and operations of the Company. It is required to do all things that may be necessary to be done in order to
carry out the objectives of the Company.

Without intending to limit this general role of the Board, the principal functions and responsibilities of the Board include 
the following.
• Leadership of the Organisation: overseeing the Company and establishing codes that reflect the values of the Company and

guide the conduct of the Board.

51

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

A D D I T I O N A L S H A R E H O L D E R I N F O R M A T I O N

• Strategy Formulation: to set and review the overall strategy and goals for the Company and ensuring that there are policies

in place to govern the operation of the Company.

• Overseeing Planning Activities: the development of the Company’s strategic plan.
• Shareholder Liaison: ensuring effective communications with shareholders through an appropriate communications policy and

promoting participation at general meetings of the Company.

• Monitoring, Compliance and Risk Management: the development of the Company’s risk management, compliance, control and

accountability systems and monitoring and directing the financial and operational performance of the Company.

• Company Finances: approving expenses and approving and monitoring acquisitions, divestitures and financial and other

reporting.

• Human Resources: appointing, and, where appropriate, removing the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial

Officer (CFO) as well as reviewing the performance of the CEO and monitoring the performance of senior management in
their implementation of the Company’s strategy.

• Ensuring the Health, Safety and Well-Being of Employees: in conjunction with the senior management team, developing,

overseeing and reviewing the effectiveness of the Company’s occupational health and safety systems to ensure the well-being
of all employees.

• Delegation of Authority: delegating appropriate powers to the CEO to ensure the effective day-to-day management of the

Company and establishing and determining the powers and functions of the Committees of the Board.

Full details of the Board’s role and responsibilities are contained in the Board Charter, a copy of which is available for inspection
at the Company’s registered office.

1.4 Board Policies
1.4.1 Conflicts of Interest
Directors must:
• disclose to the Board actual or potential conflicts of interest that may or might reasonably be thought to exist between the

interests of the Director and the interests of any other parties in carrying out the activities of the Company; and 

• if requested by the Board, within seven days or such further period as may be permitted, take such necessary and reasonable

steps to remove any conflict of interest.

If a Director cannot or is unwilling to remove a conflict of interest then the Director must, as per the Corporations Act, absent
himself or herself from the room when discussion and/or voting occurs on matters about which the conflict relates.

1.4.2 Commitments
Each member of the Board is committed to spending sufficient time to enable them to carry out their duties as a Director of
the Company.

1.4.3 Confidentiality
In accordance with legal requirements and agreed ethical standards, Directors and key executives of the Company have agreed
to keep confidential, information received in the course of the exercise of their duties and will not disclose non-public
information except where disclosure is authorised or legally mandated.

1.4.4 Continuous Disclosure 
The Board has designated the Company Secretary as the person responsible for overseeing and coordinating disclosure of
information to the ASX as well as communicating with the ASX. In accordance with the ASX Listing Rules the Company
immediately notifies the ASX of information:
• concerning the Company that a reasonable person would expect to have a material effect on the price or value of the

Company’s securities; and

• that would, or would be likely to, influence persons who commonly invest in securities in deciding whether to acquire or

dispose of the Company’s securities.

52

A D D I T I O N A L S H A R E H O L D E R I N F O R M A T I O N

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

1.4.5 Education and Induction
It is the policy of the Company that new Directors undergo an induction process in which they are given a full briefing on the
Company. Where possible this includes meetings with key executives, tours of the premises, an induction package and
presentations. Information conveyed to new Directors include:
• details of the roles and responsibilities of a Director;
• formal policies on Director appointment as well as conduct and contribution expectations;
• access to a copy of the Board Charter;
• guidelines on how the Board processes function;
• details of past, recent and likely future developments relating to the Board;
• background information on and contact information for key people in the organisation;
• an analysis of the Company;
• a synopsis of the current strategic direction of the Company; and
• a copy of the Constitution of the Company.

In order to achieve continuing improvement in Board performance, all Directors are encouraged to undergo continual
professional development. Specifically, Directors are provided with the resources and training to address skills gaps where they
are identified.

1.4.6 Independent Professional Advice
The Board collectively and each Director has the right to seek independent professional advice at the Company’s expense, up
to specified limits, to assist them to carry out their responsibilities.

1.4.7 Related Party Transactions
Related party transactions include any financial transaction between a Director and the Company. Unless there is an exemption
under the Corporations Act from the requirement to obtain shareholder approval for the related party transaction, the Board
cannot approve the transaction.

1.4.8 Shareholder Communication
The Company respects the rights of its shareholders and to facilitate the effective exercise of those rights the Company is
committed to:
• communicating effectively with shareholders through releases to the market via ASX, information mailed to shareholders and

the general meetings of the Company;

• giving shareholders ready access to balanced and understandable information about the Company and corporate proposals;
• making it easy for shareholders to participate in general meetings of the Company; and
• requesting the external auditor to attend the annual general meeting and be available to answer shareholder questions about
the conduct of the audit and the preparation and content of the auditor’s report.

The Company also makes available a telephone number and email address for shareholders to make enquiries of the Company.

1.4.9 Trading in Company Shares
Due to the size of the Company, the Board does not consider it appropriate to implement a Share Trading Policy. Rather, it
reminds directors, officers and employees of the prohibition in the Corporations Act 2001 concerning trading in the
Company’s securities when in possession of “inside information”.

1.4.10 Performance Review/Evaluation
It is the policy of the Board to conduct evaluation of its performance.The evaluation process was introduced via the Board
Charter adopted on 30 June 2005 and will be implemented for the financial year ended 30 June 2006.The objective of this
evaluation will be to provide best practice corporate governance to the Company.

53

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

A D D I T I O N A L S H A R E H O L D E R I N F O R M A T I O N

Attestations by CEO and CFO

1.4.11
It is the Board’s policy, that the CEO and the CFO make the attestations recommended by the ASX Corporate Governance
Council as to the Company’s financial condition prior to the Board signing the Annual Report. However, as at the date of this
report the Company does not have a designated CEO or CFO. Due to the size and scale of operations of the Company these
roles are performed by the Board as a whole.

2. Board Committees
2.1Audit Committee
Due to the size and scale of operations of the Company the full Board undertakes the role of the Audit Committee. Below is
a summary of the role and responsibilities of an Audit Committee.

2.1.1 Role 
The Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing the integrity of the Company’s financial reporting and overseeing the
independence of the external auditors.

As the whole Board only consists of three (3) members, the Company does not have an audit committee because it would
not be a more efficient mechanism than the full Board for focusing the Company on specific issues and an audit committee
cannot be justified based on a cost-benefit analysis. However, in accordance with the ASX Listing Rules, the Company is moving
towards establishing an audit committee consisting primarily of Independent Directors.

In the absence of an audit committee, the Board sets aside time to deal with issues and responsibilities usually delegated to
the audit committee to ensure the integrity of the financial statements of the Company and the independence of the
external auditor.

2.1.2 Responsibilities
The Audit Committee or as at the date of this report the full Board of the Company reviews the audited annual and half-
yearly financial statements and any reports which accompany published financial statements and recommends their approval to
the members.

The Audit Committee or as at the date of this report the full Board of the Company each year reviews the appointment of
the external auditor, their independence, the audit fee, and any questions of resignation or dismissal.

The Audit Committee or as at the date of this report the full Board of the Company is also responsible for establishing policies
on risk oversight and management.

2.1.3 Risk Management Policies
The Board’s Charter clearly establishes that it is responsible for ensuring there is a good sound system for overseeing and
managing risk. Due to the size and scale of operations, risk management issues are considered by the Board as a whole. On 28
September 2006 Mr Nathan McMahon (Managing Director) and Mr Kent Hunter (Company Secretary) provided the Board
with written assurance that the financial statements are founded on a sound system of risk management and internal
compliance.Their statement assured the Board that the risk management and internal compliance and control system is
operating efficiently and effectively in all material respects.

2.2 Remuneration Committee
2.2.1 Role
The role of a Remuneration Committee is to assist the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities in respect of establishing
appropriate remuneration levels and incentive policies for employees.

As the whole Board only consists of three (3) members, the Company does not have a remuneration committee because it
would not be a more efficient mechanism than the full Board for focusing the Company on specific issues.

54

A D D I T I O N A L S H A R E H O L D E R I N F O R M A T I O N

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

2.2.2 Responsibilities
The responsibilities of a Remuneration Committee, or the full Board include setting policies for senior officers’ remuneration,
setting the terms and conditions of employment for the Chief Executive Officer, reviewing and making recommendations to the
Board on the Company’s incentive schemes and superannuation arrangements, reviewing the remuneration of both Executive
and Non-Executive Directors and making recommendations on any proposed changes and undertaking reviews of the Chief
Executive Officer’s performance, including, setting with the Chief Executive Officer goals and reviewing progress in achieving
those goals.

2.2.3 Remuneration Policy 
Directors’ Remuneration was approved by resolution of the Board on 8 September 2003.

2.2.3.1 Senior Executive Remuneration Policy
The Company is committed to remunerating its senior executives in a manner that is market-competitive and consistent with
best practice as well as supporting the interests of shareholders. Consequently, under the Senior Executive Remuneration
Policy the remuneration of senior executive may be comprised of the following:

• fixed salary that is determined from a review of the market and reflects core performance requirements and expectations;
• a performance bonus designed to reward actual achievement by the individual of performance objectives and for materially

improved Company performance;

• participation in any share/option scheme with thresholds approved by shareholders;
• statutory superannuation.

By remunerating senior executives through performance and long-term incentive plans in addition to their fixed remuneration
the Company aims to align the interests of senior executives with those of shareholders and increase Company performance.
During the year there were no Non-Director Executives.

The value of shares and options were they to be granted to senior executives would be calculated using the Black and 
Scholes method.

The objective behind using this remuneration structure is to drive improved Company performance and thereby increase
shareholder value as well as aligning the interests of executives and shareholders.

The Board may use its discretion with respect to the payment of bonuses, stock options and other incentive payments.

2.2.3.2 Non-Executive Director Remuneration Policy
Non-Executive Directors are to be paid their fees out of the maximum aggregate amount approved by shareholders for the
remuneration of Non-Executive Directors. Non-Executive Directors do not receive performance based bonuses and do not
participate in equity schemes of the Company.

Non-Executive Directors are entitled to but not necessarily paid statutory superannuation.

2.2.4 Current Director Remuneration

Full details regarding the remuneration of Directors, is included in the Directors’ Report.

55

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

A D D I T I O N A L S H A R E H O L D E R I N F O R M A T I O N

2.3 Nomination Committee
2.3.1 Role
The role of a Nomination Committee is to help achieve a structured Board that adds value to the Company by ensuring an
appropriate mix of skills are present in Directors on the Board at all times.

As the whole Board only consists of three (3) members, the Company does not have a nomination committee because it
would not be a more efficient mechanism than the full Board for focusing the Company on specific issues.

2.3.2 Responsibilities
The responsibilities of a Nomination Committee would include devising criteria for Board membership, regularly reviewing the
need for various skills and experience on the Board and identifying specific individuals for nomination as Directors for review
by the Board.The Nomination Committee would also oversee management succession plans including the CEO and his/her
direct reports and evaluate the Board’s performance and make recommendations for the appointment and removal of
Directors. Currently the Board as a whole performs this role.

2.3.3 Criteria for selection of Directors
Directors are appointed based on the specific governance skills required by the Company. Given the size of the Company and
the business that it operates, the Company aims at all times to have at least one Director with experience appropriate to the
Company’s target market. In addition, Directors should have the relevant blend of personal experience in accounting and
financial management and Director-level business experience.

3. Company Code Of Conduct
The Board has decided against the implementation of a code of conduct as it does not believe that it is in the best interests of
its employees or other stakeholders to have what purports to be an exhaustive code of conduct.The Board feels that such a
code may be too prescriptive and not allow the employees the discretion they need to best serve the Company’s stakeholders.

56

A D D I T I O N A L S H A R E H O L D E R I N F O R M A T I O N

C a z a l y   R e s o u r c e s   L i m i t e d

SCHEDULE OF MINERAL TENEMENTS
AS AT 25 SEPTEMBER 2007

PROJECTS

TENEMENTS

PROJECTS

TENEMENTS

7 MILE HILL
ACACIA BORE
ALBION DOWNS
ALBION DOWNS JV 
ALICE HILL
BANDALUP JV
BARDOC JV (35%)
BARE HILL
BELELE
BIG BEN
BLACKFLAG
BONNEY DOWNS
BOUNTY
BRITISH WELL

BURBANKS
CARBINE
PARKER RANGE
CHEELIA PLAINS
CHRISTMAS BORE
CLIFFORD MT
COOLGARDIE
COSMO NEWBERRY
COSMOS NORTH JV
COWAN
EAST KALGOORLIE JV

ETHEL CREEK
FE-BONNEY DOWNS
FE-BOYWURUP
FE-HAMMERSLEY
FE-MT CECIL RHODES_
FE-OPTHAMALIA RANGE
FE-PILBARA
FORRESTANIA JV
GALILEE
GOONGARRIE JV
WEST KALGOORLIE JV

GREAT VIC DESERT
JENNY WREN
JILLEWARRA JV
JONES CREEK
JUTSON ROCKS JV
KARUKAI

1 ELA
1 ELA
1 ELA
5 PL'S
1 EL, 2 ELA'S
1 ELA
1 ELA
1 EL
10 PL'S
3 MLA'S, 26 PL'S, 8 PL'S
1 ELA
1 ELA
1 EL
1 EL, 1 ELA, 4 MLA'S,
6 PL'S, 6 PLA'S
1 ELA
1 EL
2 ELA'S
3 EL'S
1 ELA
1 ELA
2 EL'S, 2 MLA'S, 11 PL'S
4 PL'A 1 PLA
1 EL
3 PL'S

KEEP RIVER
1 ELA
KILLANIA
1 EL
KILLI KILLI HILLS
1EL, 3 ELA'S, 1 PL
KINTORE
1 EL
KURINELLI
1 ELA
1 EL
LAKE HINDS
3 ML'S, 1 MLA, 16 PL'S, 3 PLA LAKE LEFROY
1 EL
1 PLA
1 ELA
1 PL, 7 PLA'S
1 ELA
1 EL
2 PLA'S

LAKEWAY
LYNAS FIND JV
MENZIES JV
MT DUGEL
MT ISABEL
MT VETTERS
MT VETTERS JV

4 PLA'S
1 PL, 1 PLA
1 EL
1 EL
2 PL'S
1 EL, 3 PL'S
1 ELA
1EL, 1 ELA
1 EL
1 ELA
3 EL'S, 3 ML'S, 4 MLA'S,
40 PL'S, 7 PLA'S
1 ELA
1 ELA
1 EL
2 EL'S
2 EL'S
4 ELA'S
5 EL'S, 3 ELA'S
1EL, 1 ELA
1 ELA
11 PL'S
4 EL'S, 54 ML'S, 70 MLA'S,
140 PL'S, 127 PLA'S
1 ELA
1 PLA
2 EL'S
1 ELA
2 EL'S
1 ELA

NANUTARRA
NAVIGATOR
NEBO
NT-QUARTZ HILL JV
PEEDAMULLA
POLLOCK HILL
QUARTZ CIRCLE JV
ROWLES
SYLVANIA JV
TEN MILE WELL JV (10%)

1 EL
1 EL
1 EL
4 EL'S
1 ELA
1 ELA
1 EL

UR-FOSSIL DOWNS JV
UR-JAILOR BORE JV
UR-LAKE RAESIDE
UR-LAKEWAY
UR-MAROON RANGE
UR-MT HARRIS
UR-PELLS RANGE JV
UR-RAWLINSON RANGE 3 ELA'S
2 ELA'S
UR-SUNSHINE
1 ELA
WAUCHOPE
1 ELA
WEBB

WHISTLE DUCK
WHITE MT JV
WINNECKE
YAMARNA JV
YERILLA
YILGANGI JV

1 ELA
3 EL'S
2 EL'S 1 ELA
11 PL'S
1 EL, 10 PL'S
1 EL, 1 MLA, 1 PL

Notes: EL = Granted Elexploration Licence MLA = Mining Lease Application M = Granted Mining Lease ELA = Exploration Licence
Application P = Granted Prospecting Licence PLA = All tenements are 100% owned unless detailed in Notes 20 of the Joint Venue Summary

CORPORATE DIRECTORY

MANAGING DIRECTOR

Nathan McMahon

MANAGING DIRECTOR

Clive Jones

NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

Kent Hunter

COMPANY SECRETARY

Lisa Wynne

PRINCIPAL & REGISTERED OFFICE

First Floor, 22 Oxford Close

WEST LEEDERVILLE WA 6007

Telephone: (08) 9380 4600

Facsimile: (08) 9381 5911

AUDITORS

Rix Levy Fowler

Level 1,

12 Kings Park Road

WEST PERTH WA 6005

SHARE REGISTRAR

Advanced Share Registry Services

110 Stirling Highway
NEDLANDS WA 6009

Telephone: (08) 9389 8033

Facsimile: (08) 9389 7871

STOCK EXCHANGE LISTING

Australian Stock Exchange

(Home Exchange: Perth, Western Australia)

Code: CAZ

BANKERS

National Australia Bank

50 St Georges Terrace

PERTH WA 6000

www.cazalyresources.com.au

First Floor, 22 Oxford Close West Leederville WA 6007

T: (08) 9380 4600 F: (08) 9381 5911

www.cazalyresources.com.au

ABN: 23 101 049 334

A N N U A L R E P O R T 0 7