More annual reports from Cellmid Limited:
2020 ReportPeers and competitors of Cellmid Limited:
NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.Cellmid Limited 
Suite 1802, Level 18, 
15 Castlereagh Street 
Sydney NSW 2000 
Australia
ABN 69 111 304 119  
T:  +61 2 9221 6830 
F:  +61 2 9221 8535 
E:  info@cellmid.com.au 
W: www.cellmid.com.au
2014 Annual Report
C
E
L
L
M
I
D
L
I
M
I
T
E
D
2
0
1
4
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T
 
 
 
 
Contents 
Chairman’s Letter
CEO’s Report
Directors’ Report
Corporate Governance Statement
Annual Financial Report
Additional Information
Corporate Directory
4
5
11
25
29
73
76
Cellmid Limited (ASX:CDY) 
Annual Report
ABN 69 111 304 119
Suite 1802, Level 18 
15 Castlereagh Street 
Sydney NSW 2000 
Australia
T: +61 2 9221 6830 
F: +61 2 9221 8535
E:  info@cellmid.com.au 
W:  www.cellmid.com.au
Chairman’s
Letter
Dear Shareholder
I am pleased to present to you the 2014 
Annual Report for Cellmid Limited.
During  the  2014  financial  year  the 
Company has made strong advances, 
with important milestones achieved in all 
areas of the business. The record revenue 
of $2.8 million and continued increase in 
net asset backing clearly demonstrates 
that our business strategy is working. 
Our focus remains on building a balanced 
pharmaceutical  product  development 
business with both sustainable revenues 
and scale-changing upside potential; we 
believe that achieving this will ultimately 
be positively reflected in the Company’s 
share price. 
Progress with our therapeutic programs 
has  been  rapid  and  exciting  during 
the  reporting  period.  In  May  Cellmid 
announced  the  successful  humanisa-
tion  and  pre-clinical  testing  of  its  lead 
anti-cancer  antibody,  CAB102,  which 
has since entered the clinical develop-
ment phase. 
Manufacturing  is  underway  and  the 
planning  for  necessary  toxicity  testing 
and  ethics  approvals  to  conduct  a 
first-in-human  safety  study  continues. 
Assuming  smooth  progress  through 
these steps CAB102 is expected to be 
administered to cancer patients in 2015. 
This clinical trial will herald a watershed 
moment  for  the  Company,  and  for  our 
midkine  therapeutics  in  general,  since 
it will be the first time midkine has ever 
been  targeted  by  any  drug.  A  safe 
outcome in this study would add signifi-
cant value not only to CAB102, but also 
to Cellmid’s other therapeutic programs. 
Pleasing progress also continues to be 
made  in  our  diagnostic  portfolio.  The 
Cxbladder® test developed by our licen-
see  Pacific  Edge  has  been  released 
for  sale  in  the  US,  Australia  and  New 
Zealand, with Spain soon to be added 
 4 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
to  the  list.  Royalties  are  expected  to 
begin  during  the  2015  financial  year 
from these markets. 
Quest  (Celera)  continued  to  report  good 
progress with their lung cancer diagnostic 
program, and clinical validation of their test 
is well advanced. Meanwhile, Japanese 
company  Fujikura  continues  their  devel-
opment  of  a  pathology  lab-friendly 
midkine assay. In addition, the Company 
has entered into new research collabora-
tions during the past year, and we aim to 
translate these efforts into further licensing 
opportunities in the future.
Clinical and scientific interest in midkine 
continues  to  grow  internationally  to 
Cellmid’s  benefit  given  the  extensive 
patent  protection  that  the  Company 
holds  across  all  facets  of  the  target. 
The  Company  is  well  placed  to  share 
in  any  commercial  successes  flowing 
from midkine research. 
In  February  the  prominence  of  midkine 
as  a  disease  target  was  greatly  boosted 
when the prestigious and influential British 
Journal  of  Pharmacology  dedicated  an 
entire  Special  Themed  Issue  to  midkine 
biology.  In  April  we  co-hosted  our  Third 
Midkine  Symposium,  on  this  occasion  in 
Kyoto, Japan, where the midkine story first 
started. Once again this meeting attracted 
a  world-class  line-up  of  speakers  and 
delegates  from  research  institutes  and 
universities  from  around  the  world.  Our 
invited  scientists  shared  with  us  many 
exciting developments around midkine, 
spanning  a  wide  range  of  disease 
indications.
Our key assets are our patents, and the 
portfolio  around  midkine  continues  to 
grow and mature; newly granted patents 
during the year included a grant from the 
UK Patent Office for the use of midkine 
for  hair  growth,  in  addition  to  a  USA 
patent  for  surgical  adhesion.  Cellmid 
remains  the  global  leader  in  midkine 
intellectual property with a portfolio of 87 
patents across 21 patent families.
In  parallel  to  the  diligent  advances  in 
our midkine business, Cellmid’s wholly 
owned  consumer  health  subsidiary, 
Advangen, continued with growing sales 
and new patent filings. Since acquiring 
the Japanese parent company (Advan-
gen  Inc.)  in  May  2013,  the  Company 
has dramatically expanded the upcom-
ing  product  offerings,  accessed  new 
markets  and  opened  up  new  sales 
channels in existing territories. 
In Japan, a distribution agreement was 
signed  in  late  2013  allowing  for  new 
product  launch  in  October  2014.  We 
have signed our first distribution agree-
ment  in  China  and  business  develop-
ment  efforts  in  other  major  markets 
including  the  USA,  Europe  and  South 
America are well advanced. 
Meanwhile,  the  Advangen  scientific 
team has discovered and patented novel 
botanical extracts that inhibit FGF5 with 
even greater efficiency than the current 
active  ingredients.  These  extracts  will 
form  the  basis  of  our  next  generation 
hair growth products. The 2014 financial 
year placed us well on the way to estab-
lishing the Company as a global leader 
in  scientifically  and  clinically  validated 
hair growth technology representing part 
of  the  scale-changing  upside  potential 
to which I referred earlier.
Further  details  of  all  these  positive 
developments  can  be  found  in  the 
report of our CEO, Maria Halasz.
Our achievements during the year would 
not have been possible without the excep-
tional commitment and professionalism of 
our  small  team  of  staff  and  consultants, 
capably  led  by  our  CEO  Maria  Halasz. 
On  behalf  of  shareholders  I  express  our 
thanks  for  their  commendable  perform-
ance.  Finally  I  take  this  opportunity  to 
thank all shareholders for their continued 
support and encouragement. 
Dr David King
Chairman of the Board 
Cellmid Limited
 
 
 
 
 
 
CEO’s
Report
Dear Shareholder,
I  am  delighted  to  report  to  you  on  this  2014  financial  year. 
Reflecting on an exceptionally productive year, with a 267% 
increase  in  revenue  to  $2.8  million  and  significant  develop-
ments in our midkine antibody (MK antibody) program, Cellmid 
has been going from strength to strength during the period. 
The Company has grown substantially in 2014 in its operations, 
assets and revenues. Sales in our consumer health business 
reached $1.15 million, up 112% from 2013 ($541,649). Our 
license related income reached $1.4 million. Although this was 
mostly due to one off licensing fees we expect regular royalties 
in  2015.  The  value  of  our  tangible  assets  has  increased,  as 
have our intangibles. 
In a major therapeutic milestone two of our murine anti-midkine 
antibodies showed efficacy in in vivo cancer models in October 
2013 opening the door for clinical development. Since then, we 
have successfully completed humanisation and lead selection 
of our first drug candidate and commenced manufacturing. 
Three years ago we set out with a strategy to build up revenues, 
while  maintaining  the  momentum  for  significant  value  inflec-
tion  from  our  therapeutic  program.  It’s  worthwhile  to  reflect 
on the journey since then. Some of the Company’s achieve-
ments in that time are easily quantified in financial measures 
and summarised in Table 1 below. In addition to the 1532% 
revenue  growth  over  three  years  Cellmid  has  shown  contin-
ued  investment  in  research  and  development  while  manag-
ing to cut losses 28% along the way. Critically, the Company 
improved  its  income/expenditure  ratio  covering  65%  of  all 
outgoings through sales and licensing revenues in 2014.
Cellmid has been progressively reducing its reliance on issuing 
new  shares  for  working  capital  during  the  past  three  years. 
Underlying asset values have increased by the prudent deploy-
ment  of  capital  into  high  value  research  and  development 
programs. Although the Company raised a modest amount of 
money from the market in December 2013 ($2 million) through 
a private placement, this did not result in dilution and we have 
increased  our  net  tangible  asset  backing  during  the  2014 
financial year to 0.51 cents per share. 
In addition to generating revenues the Company has contin-
ued to diligently manage costs and invest shareholders’ funds 
wisely.  This  strategy  was  already  showing  results  in  2013, 
but  the  2014  financial  year  has  produced  metrics  that  are 
outstanding endorsements of the Company’s efforts. 
MK antibody program is primed to enter the clinic in 2015
After  delivering  compelling  results  in  diabetic  nephropathy 
in  2013  Cellmid’s  MK  antibodies  have  subsequently  shown 
efficacy and clear mechanism of action in pre-clinical models 
of cancer. During the period the Company completed several 
xenograft studies using its lead MK antibodies and observed 
promising results. 
The MK antibody treatment slowed primary tumour growth, 
reduced cancer spread (metastasis) and slowed the forma-
tion of new blood vessels (angiogenesis) in different tumour 
types.  These  findings  completed  the  Company’s  exten-
sive  early  studies  to  determine  clinical  direction  for  its  MK 
antibodies. 
After  assessment  of  the  data  from  all  previous  pre-clinical 
efficacy studies, including the strong efficacy from our diabetic 
nephropathy  studies in  2013 and reviewing  commercial  and 
intellectual property issues, the Company has made a decision 
to enter the clinic in multiple cancer indications. Cellmid is in a 
very fortunate position as its MK antibodies show potential in 
several disease indications, allowing for broad future exploita-
tion of the Company’s intellectual property. 
Table 1: Results 2012-2014 
Total revenue
Loss after income tax
R&D spending
Current assets
Loss per share
Net tangible asset backing per share
Income/Expenditure ratio
2012
$171,273 
$1,972,483
$1,636,711 
$2,441,636 
0.46
0.48
6%
2013
$761,288
$1,541,307
 $1,746,369 
 $3,778,936 
0.27
0.48
25%
2014
$2,795,948
$1,480,836
 $2,100,000 
 $4,499,891 
0.21
0.51
65%
% change 
2012-2014
up 1532%
down 25%
up 28%
up 84%
down 54%
up 6%
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report  5
 
 
 
CEO’s Report 
Continued
Critical  in  any  successful  drug  development  is  the  selec-
tion of the lead drug, in this case the best performing MK 
antibody,  which  then  can  enter  a  clinical  development 
program.  Having  a  large  number  of  candidates  has  been 
fortunate as it allowed the Company for ‘back-ups’ in case 
the  original  drug  failed  to  be  manufacturable  or  wasn’t 
showing the expected performance. It has also made the 
selection  of  the  lead  more  difficult  as  more  than  one  of 
the Company’s MK-antibodies have performed above the 
threshold for selection.
For this reason it was especially exciting that, as a leap in 
advancing towards clinical trials, we reported in May 2014 
the  completion  of  humanisation,  testing,  and  selection  of 
our lead MK antibody for our planned ‘first in class’ clinical 
trials. 
The lead antibody, designated CAB102, significantly reduced 
chemotherapy resistance in a pre-clinical treatment model of 
refractory lung cancer. Importantly, initial cell expression and 
stability data confirmed that CAB102 is manufacturable and 
stable, making it a feasible commercial drug product. 
Selection of CAB102 was the result of a pre-clinical program 
in  which  dozens  of  Cellmid’s  proprietary  and  patent-
protected murine MK antibodies were assessed for efficacy 
and mechanism of action both in vivo and in vitro. Eventu-
ally, the two most promising murine antibodies identified by 
this  process  were  humanised  by  Cellmid’s  collaborators, 
Biotecnol SA. 
Of the 78 humanised antibody variants generated by Biotecnol 
SA,  the  six  most  promising  candidates  were  then  assessed 
further for mechanism of action, in vivo anti-tumour efficacy, 
and manufacturability. 
Manufacturability was assessed by cell line expression and 
level  of  aggregate  formation  in  a  feasibility  run.  Specificity 
for  MK  has  been  retained,  with  no  evidence  of  binding  to 
other  proteins.  A  preliminary  assessment  showed  all  six 
candidates  were  secreted  at  commercially  viable  concen-
trations  during  cell  culture,  all  six  candidates  were  readily 
purified and have been confirmed as structurally stable and 
aggregate free. 
The  six  MK  antibody  candidates  were  then  tested  for 
functional activity in vitro and in vivo using a tumour xenograft 
model  in  combination  with  carboplatin.  Carboplatin  was 
selected  as  the  chemotherapy  of  choice  as  it  is  standard 
therapy  in  lung  cancer.  The  cancer  xenograft  studies  were 
performed in the widely studied K-Ras mutant, highly refrac-
tory  and  difficult  to  treat  human  non-small  cell  lung  carci-
noma (NSCLC) cell line NCI-H460. 
 6 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
As expected, and consistent with clinical experience, carbo-
platin  did  not  significantly  reduce  tumour  volume  or  mass 
when  used  alone  compared  to  untreated  controls  in  the 
NCI-H460  model.  However,  three  of  the  six  MK  antibody 
candidates  significantly  reduced  tumour  growth  when 
combined  with  carboplatin.  CAB102  has  shown  the  great-
est efficacy reducing mean tumour volumes at 21 days post 
treatment by 50%. 
This was an exciting result providing a strong commercial 
rationale for the MK antibody program in multiple cancer 
types. 
Concurrently to the humanisation and lead selection, Cellmid 
actively assessed potential manufacturers. After an extensive 
tendering process the Company selected Rodon Biologics, a 
subsidiary  of  Biotecnol  SA,  to  manufacture  CAB102.  Under 
the agreement, Rodon will be responsible to engineer a high 
yielding  CHO  cell  line  expressing  CAB102,  along  with  the 
processes necessary to manufacture and formulate the drug 
for first in human trials. 
One  of  the  key  considerations  in  choosing  Rodon  was  that 
it  has  already  produced  the  humanised  candidates  for  initial 
screening and tested CAB102’s manufacturability and stabil-
ity  in  small-scale  production  runs  as  part  of  the  humanisa-
tion. The Company has collaborated closely with the Rodon 
team during these work programs establishing a solid working 
relationship. 
Further cementing a strong collaboration was the agreement 
signed with Biotecnol Ltd, another Biotecnol group company, 
for the development of midkine (MK) TribodiesTM. MK Tribod-
ies™  are  antibodies  targeting  MK  in  addition  to  other 
oncogenic proteins. Biotecnol is one of the pioneers of multi-
specific antibody engineering with a validated and proprietary 
technology platform.
The agreement allows for the parties to exchange ideas freely; 
Biotecnol is responsible for the development and validation of 
the novel MK TribodiesTM and Cellmid is expected to conduct 
pre-clinical  efficacy  studies.  The  parties  will  share  further 
development costs equally and will jointly own the new multi-
specific  drugs.  The  collaboration  agreement  is  expected  to 
result  in  one  or  more  novel  and  proprietary  MK  TribodiesTM. 
Although  early  stage  and  potentially  high  risk,  the  collabo-
ration  is  also  a  low  cost  entry  for  the  Company  in  the  hotly 
contested multi-specific antibody space. 
As  our  lead  antibody  CAB102  is  entering  clinical  develop-
ment, and a potential pipeline of products is on the horizon. 
Cellmid’s MK antibody program is entering a truly exciting and 
company changing period. 
Cxbladder® is one of the success stories for MK as an 
oncology biomarker
MK has continued as the subject of several cancer diagnostic 
studies and results confirmed that it is indeed an important early 
tumour marker. Cellmid completed its two year healthy volun-
teer  study  (CK3000)  in  December  2013  not  only  confirming 
‘normal’  MK  levels  but  finding  outliers  that  presented  healthy 
and  normal  in  all  other  biomarkers.  On  further  examination 
these subjects, with elevated MK levels, in fact had underlying 
medical conditions expected with their respective MK levels. 
In a strong start to the financial year Cellmid received confirma-
tion in July 2013 that Fujikura Kasei Co Ltd (Fujikura) intended 
to exercise its option to licence the MK diagnostic technology. 
With  the  exercising  of  the  option  Fujikura  paid  the  requisite 
JPY40  million  ($440,000)  milestone  fee,  contributing  to  the 
$1.4 million total licensing revenue for the financial year. The 
license  agreement,  currently  in  negotiations,  is  expected  to 
grant exclusive rights to Fujikura to use Cellmid’s proprietary 
antibodies  for  latex  based  tests  in  Japan.  In  return,  Fujikura 
will pay royalties on products sold. Product development and 
marketing costs will be borne by Fujikura. 
Although Cellmid has a highly accurate MK-ELISA already, a 
latex  based  assay  is  expected  to  suit  commercial  products 
better, as it is widely used and accepted in pathology labora-
tories. It is also preferred as it can easily be automated, reduc-
ing processing costs.
A  latex  based  test  with  a  500  picogram/ml  accuracy  is  well 
suited to identify individuals with elevated midkine levels. This 
in turn is expected to lead to the development of a number 
of cancer diagnostic products. Cellmid will support Fujikura’s 
regulatory  and  product  development  programs  with  its  MK 
diagnostic expertise during the period of the license.
Having Fujikura, one of the largest suppliers of latex particles 
for  the  medical  diagnostics  industry  in  Japan,  as  licensee  is 
important in carving out a market for Cellmid’s MK diagnostic 
products. 
Cellmid’s existing licensees, Quest (Celera) and Pacific Edge, 
have  also  achieved  significant  milestones  in  their  product 
development and commercialisation programs, which resulted 
in  the  payment  of  another  milestone  fee  of  $800,000  when 
Cxbladder® was launched in the USA.
Cxbladder® sales commenced in the USA 
Bladder cancer is one of the most common forms of malignan-
cies. In the United States around one million patients present 
annually  with  haematuria;  of  these,  68,000  are  diagnosed 
with bladder cancer. Once treated, patients will have regular 
cystoscopies,  painful  urethra  endoscopies, 
to  monitor 
reoccurrence. Pacific Edge’s Cxbladder® has the potential to 
replace cystoscopy over time as a preferred method of patient 
monitoring tool.
Cxbladder®,  with  MK  as  one  of  the  important  biomarkers, 
has  shown  outstanding  performance  in  clinical  studies  to 
date, with 100% sensitivity and 85% specificity in late stage 
bladder cancer. This specificity is expected to increase when 
using  it  in  a  monitoring  setting.  The  test  can  also  be  used 
to differentiate between high and low grade cancers. In their 
2014  Annual  Report  Pacific  Edge  Chairman,  Chris  Swann, 
reiterated  their  earlier  projections  of  $100  million  sales  after 
five full years of trading. Cellmid will receive single digit royal-
ties on net sales.
Quest (Celera) Lung Cancer License
Cellmid  signed  a  license  agreement  with  Quest  (Celera)  in 
October 2009 enabling Quest (Celera) to include MK as one 
of the biomarkers in a lung cancer diagnostic test. The license 
covers  using  MK  for  the  early  diagnosis,  prognosis,  disease 
monitoring  and  management  of  lung  cancer.  The  terms  of 
the agreement provide for a milestone payment at the time of 
regulatory clearance for the lung cancer test, and royalties to 
be paid semi-annually. 
In  June  2014  Cellmid  received  an  annual  update  on  the 
progress made in the development of the Quest (Celera) lung 
cancer  test.  In  their  letter  of  update  Quest  (Celera)  stressed 
that during the reporting period it continued to work diligently 
towards  the  launch  of  a  lung  cancer  diagnostic  test  which 
includes MK. They asserted their belief that they have achieved 
major advances during the period, in particular with the clinical 
studies performed. 
Since 2009 Quest (Celera) has been developing a blood test 
to replace biopsy for determining whether pulmonary nodules 
identified through computer tomography or chest X-rays are 
cancerous. Quest (Celera) confirmed last year that validation 
of the six-marker blood test was completed on the commer-
cial Luminex® diagnostic platform. They also reported in 2013 
that they had signed an agreement with the NCI to participate 
in the chest X-Ray screening Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and 
Ovarian Trial (PLCO) as part of their clinical validation program.
Cellmid  signed  a  license  agreement  with  Pacific  Edge 
Limited  in  2010  for  the  use  of  MK  as  one  of  the  biomark-
ers in their bladder cancer test (Cxbladder®). Pacific Edge has 
achieved solid progress since the license was signed and has 
commenced sales using its CLIA registered Pennsylvania labs.
Quest (Celera) has noted that there is growing support for a 
lung cancer screening program in the USA with recommenda-
tion from the US Preventative Screening Task Force (Decem-
ber 2013). Their estimate for the target market of the test is 7 
million people annually, who are at high risk for lung cancer.
1   Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment, CLIA, sets standards and issues certificates for clinical laboratory testing in the United States. 
   It is administered by the US Centre for Medicare and Medical Devices, CMS
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report  7
CEO’s Report 
Continued
This is an important period for Quest (Celera) to advance to 
regulatory filings of its test as its exclusivity for the use of MK 
for  lung  cancer  diagnosis  expires  in  on  31  October  2014. 
Whilst they may continue to use MK after that date, Cellmid 
will  have  the  option  to  license  MK  to  others  for  lung  cancer 
diagnosis under the terms of the license agreement. 
Huana Likang Biotechnology Cellmid has found a partner with 
strong  growth  potential  and  a  dedicated  sales  force  for  its 
FGF5 inhibitor brands. Costs associated with marketing and 
sales will be met solely by the distributor, however Cellmid will 
provide assistance by supplying its marketing information and 
materials and product designs.
Consumer health division delivered 112% revenue 
increase in 2014 and growing
It  was  only  in  late  2012  that  our  consumer  health  division 
became visible with the launch of our first Australian product, 
evolis®. Since then, acquiring Advangen Inc. (Japan) resulted 
in a transformative 2014 financial year. Advangen became an 
international business with operations in Australia and Japan, 
but with market potential far beyond these countries. 
Embedding  the  acquisition  during  2014  was  challenging 
and  meant  harmonising  accounting  systems,  renegotiating 
employment, supplier and manufacturing contracts, resetting 
distribution  agreements  and  focusing  on  the  redevelopment 
and branding of the full Advangen product range. At the end 
of the first merged financial year I am pleased to report that 
we have completed several of these key operational, product, 
manufacturing, distribution and sales targets.
There is excitement in this sector particularly as demand for 
performance driven hair care is growing rapidly. Within the $80 
billion annual global market for hair care by far the most upside 
is expected from anti-aging products. These are products that 
can  improve  the  quality,  thickness  and  growth  rate  of  hair. 
While most products are either polymers or proteins that can 
improve hair quality temporarily, there is a dearth of bioactive 
hair care that affects the actual hair follicle making it stronger 
and healthier. With our efficacious FGF5 inhibitors Cellmid has 
the opportunity to become a leader in this market.
By far the fastest growing geographical region for anti-aging 
hair care is China. When Cellmid acquired Advangen Inc., the 
Company  became  the  owner  of  Chinese  import  permits  for 
the  Japnese  produced  Jo-Ju®  and  Lexilis  Black®  brands  of 
lotions  and  shampoo.  On  29  January  2014  Cellmid  signed 
(via  its  wholly  owned  subsidiary  Advangen  Inc.  (Japan))  a 
Chinese  distribution  agreement  for  its  Lexilis  Black™  and 
Jo-Ju™ brands with Beijing Huana Likang Biotechnology Co 
Ltd. The distribution agreement is exclusive for these brands 
in China subject to minimum performance requirements. The 
agreement is for a period of three years, however it may be 
automatically extended if minimum sales are met. 
There  has  been  intense  interest  in  Cellmid’s  FGF5  inhibitor 
hair growth products from various market segments following 
the acquisition of Advangen Inc. (Japan). In selecting Beijing 
 8 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
Ordinarily,  companies  importing  healthcare  and  cosmetic 
goods to China face significant hurdles; often it takes several 
years before sales permits are issued. This is increasingly the 
case as Chinese authorities are keen to enforce even stricter 
conditions on imports. Whilst not formally acknowledged on 
the  Company’s  balance  sheets,  it  is  likely  that  the  value  of 
Cellmid’s import permits to China have increased significantly 
since acquisition. 
In  last  year’s  Annual  Report  we  stated  that  “our  objective  is 
to  establish  ourselves  as  a  global  leader  in  scientifically  and 
clinically validated hair growth technology building a substan-
tial  business,  which  provides  cash  flow  and  adds  significant 
shareholder  value”.  With  a  112%  increase  in  revenue,  new 
patent filings, expanding the distribution to China, signing new 
distribution agreements in Japan and opening discussions in 
other markets we are well on our way to achieving it. 
Patent Portfolio Update
Cellmid holds the most significant intellectual property assets 
related  to  MK  worldwide.  Cellmid’s  patent  portfolio  currently 
includes  87  patents  in  21  patent  families,  which  cover  the 
use of MK and anti-MK agents for therapeutic purposes in a 
number of diseases, as well as the use of MK as a diagnostic 
marker in cancer and other disorders.
During the period our patent portfolio continued to grow with 
new filings and grants. In a tremendous commercial outcome 
on 8 October 2014 Cellmid reported that the European Patent 
Office  has  granted  its  patent  entitled  “Antibody  recognising 
C-domain  of  midkine”.  The  granted  claims  provide  broad 
coverage as they relate to antibodies and antibody fragments 
which  bind  to  the  important  functional  C-domain  of  growth 
factor MK. 
The  patent  also  grants  composition  of  matter  claims  for 
MK-specific  antibodies,  including  Cellmid’s  lead  anti-cancer 
antibody. 
This  is  a  key  patent  in  Cellmid’s  portfolio  and  gives  the 
Company  clear,  exclusive  rights  to  develop  MK  antibodies  
(including  CAB102)  unencumbered  by  competition.  Moreo-
ver,  Cellmid’s  patent  coverage  for  its  therapeutic  antibodies 
now  extends  across  cancer,  inflammatory  and  autoimmune 
diseases, multiple sclerosis and surgical adhesion. 
In a further boost to the Company’s MK antibody patent portfo-
lio the Japanese Patent Office (JPO) granted patent applica-
tion JP 2007-544236 “Method for Treatment or Prevention of 
Diseases Associated with a Functional Disorder of Regulatory 
T Cells” on 18 October 2013. It is a member of a key patent 
family  in  Cellmid’s  antibody  patent  portfolio  and  it  adds  yet 
another  layer  of  intellectual  property  protection  to  Cellmid’s 
MK antibody program.
JP 2007-544236 covers the use of MK antibodies to increase 
the  number  of  regulatory  T  cells  (Tregs).  Tregs  are  central 
controllers of autoimmune responses; when Treg numbers are 
too low, the body’s immune system can attack its own tissues, 
leaving subjects vulnerable to autoimmune diseases. Increas-
ing the Treg numbers can mitigate such autoimmune attack. 
This family was granted last year in the USA with similar claims 
allowed. The patents in this family expire in 2027. 
In another development on the intellectual property front the 
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) granted 
Cellmid’s  patent  application  13/539,247  entitled  “Preventa-
tive for Adhesion Following Abdominal Surgery”. This patent 
protects  the  use  of  midkine  (MK)-specific  DNA  and  RNA 
antisense molecules that disrupt MK expression and prevent 
the formation of surgical adhesions. 
This  patent  complements  the  already  granted  US  patent 
10/547,011 entitled ‘Agents for Preventing Post-Laparotomy 
Adhesions’,  which  covers  the  use  of  MK  antibodies  and 
broadens the platform of the Company’s anti-midkine agents. 
Other  patents  in  this  family  have  already  been  granted  in 
Japan  and  are  under  examination  in  Europe.  The  surgical 
adhesion patents make up one of the five key families which 
provide the company’s dominant intellectual property position 
over the treatment of inflammatory diseases by targeting MK.
Midkine a scientifically important target for many 
diseases
It is not often that one can report that a major scientific journal 
dedicated  their  entire  review  edition  to  a  single  company’s 
technology. Yet this is exactly what happened in February 2014 
when the British Journal of Pharmacology (BJP) published a 
special edition dedicated to MK including 16 research papers 
by  various  authors.  The  BJP  is  the  premier  peer-reviewed 
publication  of  the  British  Pharmacological  Society,  and  it  is 
recognised as one of the most influential international journals 
covering all aspects of experimental pharmacology. 
Being  featured  in  a  high-impact,  internationally  regarded 
journal  with  a  global  audience  is  a  significant  validation  of 
MK’s importance in health and disease. Cellmid recognised 
this potential early on, and it is pleasing to see the increas-
ing  and  ever  wider  realisation  of  MK’s  potential  utility  as  a 
disease target or as a therapeutic agent in its own right.
Having MK reviewed in this way is also very helpful to Cellmid’s 
product development programs. The publications provide 
strong supporting evidence to regulators, key opinion leaders 
and potential biotech and pharma partners. 
Further  validating  MK’s  importance  as  a  disease  target  was 
the largest attendance yet by scientists from eleven countries 
at  the  Third  Midkine  Symposium  in  Kyoto  in  April  2014. 
The  Symposium,  co-hosted  by  Emeritus  Professor  Takashi 
Muramatsu  and  Professor  Kenji  Kadomatsu,  built  on  the 
success of the first two MK meetings held in Sydney in 2010 
and Istanbul in 2012 and delivered significant advances on our 
understanding of MK biology and function. 
During  the  Symposium  it  was  reported  that  serum-stable, 
drug-like  MK  manufacture  has  been  achieved  at  large  scale 
for clinical use by one of the company’s commercial partners 
and new insights were presented into MK’s molecular struc-
ture  and  its  functional  implications.  Further  understanding 
of the receptors and signalling pathways engaged by MK in 
cancer  and  other  diseases  have  been  illustrated  in  in  vitro 
and in vivo studies by several scientists directly relevantly to 
Cellmid’s own MK antibody studies in cancer.
Perhaps most stunningly, the precise mechanism of action by 
which  MK  promotes  inflammatory  cell  infiltration  into  tissues 
was  presented  during  the  Symposium  giving  clear  insights 
into how anti-MK treatments might disrupt this process. 
This has been a truly exceptional year with strong financial and 
operational performance in all of the Company’s businesses. 
We are beginning to see the reaction from the market but the 
real value created is yet to be built into the Company’s share 
price. We are determined to continue on this path and pursue 
increased shareholder value on all fronts. 
This progress would not be possible without the unwavering 
support from our Chairman, Dr David King, and the Board. I 
would like to thank them and the dedicated Cellmid team for 
their contribution in achieving these substantial milestones this 
financial year. I would also like to thank our shareholders for 
their support.
Issue  contains 
invited  reviews 
The  BJP  Midkine 
from 
pre-eminent  MK  researchers  from  around  the  world,  with 
comprehensive up-to-date articles covering the gamut of MK 
biology. Publications examine the role of MK in diseases includ-
ing various cancers, kidney diseases, cardiovascular disease, 
multiple  sclerosis  and  neurodegenerative  disorders.  New 
understanding of MK signalling and receptors is also featured.
Maria Halasz
CEO and Managing Director
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report  9
Directors’ 
Report
11
24
25
29
Contents
Directors’ Report
Auditor’s Independence Declaration
Corporate Governance Statement
Annual Financial Report
The  directors  present  their  report,  together  with  the  financial  statements  of  the  Group,  being  Cellmid  Limited  (“the 
Company”) and its Controlled Entities, for the financial year ended 30 June 2014.
Principal activities and significant changes in nature of activities 
The principal activities of the Group during the financial year were:
•  The development and commercialisation of diagnostic and therapeutic products for the management of diseases such 
as cancer and various chronic inflammatory conditions by targeting midkine (Midkine Business); and
•  the development and sale of over the counter (OTC) treatments to alleviate excessive and abnormal hair loss and re- 
establish the natural hair growth cycle (Consumer Health Business)
There were no significant changes in the nature of the Group’s principal activities during the financial year.
Operating results and review of operations for the year
Operating results 
The consolidated loss of the Group was down 3.9% to $1,480,836, after providing for income tax ($1,541,307 in 2013). 
Revenue from product sales was up by more than 112% to $1,150,931 ($541,649 in 2013), while total revenue and other 
income was up by more than 267% to $2,795,948 for the year ($761,288 in 2013). 
REviEw Of OpERAtiOns 
The Group closed its first full year of operations for the Consumer Health Business following the acquisition of Advangen 
Inc. The Japanese distribution was expanded and new contracts have been signed with existing partners. In Australia, 
sales to hair salons commenced during the reporting period.
Further development milestones have been achieved in the Group’s Midkine Business with the completion of humanisa-
tion  and  lead  antibody  (CAB102)  selection  and  the  commencement  of  manufacturing  for  clinical  trials.  The  Group  has 
commenced preparations for its ’First-in-human’ clinical studies with reviewing clinical sites and negotiating with principal 
investigators. The Group’s diagnostic business has delivered solid revenue during the reporting period from milestone and 
option to license fees. 
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report  11
Directors’ Report 
Continued
i. Consumer Health Business – Distribution continues to grow for the Group’s FGF5 inhibitor hair growth products
The Consumer Health Business was set up to commercialise over the counter hair growth products based on the FGF5 
inhibition technology developed by Advangen Inc. (Japan). With the acquisition of Advangen Inc. (Japan) in May 2013 the 
Group has taken control of global rights for the technology and closed the first full year of operations for the joint business. 
In Japan the Group signed a major distribution agreement with Natural Garden, a direct marketing company, for the supply 
of existing brands and newly developed products. The salon distribution has also been expanded for the male lotion and 
shampoo brands (Lexilis Black®). Test marketing of the Group’s new female brand of lotions and shampoos, Jo-Ju Red® 
commenced in Japan. 
In Australia the roll out of the products in hair salons commenced in New South Wales in March 2014 with strong results. 
Recruitment of sales people will continue in other states over the coming months. The Group has not invested in market-
ing into pharmacies during the period, which meant that new doors have been opened but sell through has slowed down.    
The Advangen Inc. acquisition delivered Chinese import permits for the Lexilis® and Jo-Ju® brands, with the potential to 
accelerate geographical expansion of the distribution. The Group has been able to take advantage of these valuable assets 
and signed a distribution agreement with Beijing Huana Likang, a marketing company with primary channels in television 
shopping networks and online sales.
The Group has been successful in the fractionation and synthesis of novel FGF5 inhibitors and filed new composition of 
matter patent applications during the period. New formulations have been prepared using these discoveries and a safety 
study has been initiated in humans. The new formulations have also given impetus to a product strategy and technology 
review, which was commenced in June 2014. 
ii. Midkine Business
Advances in therapeutic product development – lead antibody in manufacturing for clinical studies
Under this program the Group has been developing its anti-midkine antibody drugs in several indications and, on the basis 
of data generated from its pre-clinical efficacy studies, elected to proceed to ’First-in-human’ clinical studies in oncology. 
During the reporting period the Group has achieved significant milestones on its path to the clinic. Proof of concept studies 
have shown that the Group’s antibody drug is effective in cancer when assessed in a pre-clinical model of non-small cell 
lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The Group successfully humanised its antibodies and selected a lead drug candidate (CAB102) 
to progress to clinical studies. Importantly, manufacturability of CAB102 has been confirmed and the Group has appointed 
its manufacturing partner.   
This program received significant boost during the reporting with the granting of major patents. The European Patent Office 
granted  one  of  the  Group’s  most  important  midkine  antibody  patent  applications,  “Antibody  Recognising  C  domain  of 
midkine”, which has oncology claims. Another antibody patent entitled “Method for the treatment or prevention of diseases 
associated with a functional disorder of T Cells” was granted by the Japanese Patent Office in October 2013. 
iii. Midkine (MK) Diagnostic Program
The Group’s licensees, Pacific Edge Limited and Celera Quest, continued to make significant progress towards commer-
cialisation of their respective products during the reporting period. Fujikura Kasei has exercised its option to license the 
Group’s antibodies for diagnostic purposes in Japan. A new diagnostic collaboration was signed with Abcodia Limited 
during the reporting period for the assessment of midkine in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer, and internal diagnostic 
programs have continued. 
iv. Pacific Edge Limited   launched Cxbladder® in the USA with midkine as one of the biomarkers
The Group signed a license agreement with Pacific Edge Limited in 2010 for the use of the Group’s  midkine protein as one 
of the biomarkers in Cxbladder®, a bladder cancer diagnostic test. According to the terms of the license Pacific Edge paid 
an upfront fee and was to pay a milestone fee in shares on reaching first sale of the product outside of Australia and New 
Zealand. Pacific Edge launched its Cxbladder® test in the USA in March 2013 and signed up a number of US health-care 
12  Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
providers, making their first commercial sale in July 2013. This event triggered the last milestone payment to the Group 
which was received on 1 August 2014. 
v. Celera Quest license update
The  Group  signed  a  license  agreement  with  Celera  Quest  in  October  2009  for  the  use  of  midkine  in  their  lung  cancer 
diagnostic  test.  The  Group  received  an  upfront  payment  at  the  time  of  signing,  and  a  milestone  payment  will  become 
payable by Celera Quest at the time of regulatory clearance and royalties on sales. 
During the reporting period Celera Quest continued to work towards the launch of a lung cancer diagnostic test which 
includes MK and reported the achievement of major milestones. Celera Quest commenced testing of the samples obtained 
from the US National Cancer Institute (NCI) sponsored Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) trial on the Luminex 
platform.  The Group has been advised that the PLCO study results are expected in late 2014. 
In addition, Celera Quest reported on the completion of four other clinical studies conducted as part of their clinical valida-
tion program for the lung cancer test. Celera Quest  has until 31 October 2014 to commercialise their lung cancer blood 
test with MK included, after which they maintain their ability to use MK, but will lose exclusivity under the terms of the 
license agreement. 
vi. Fujikura Kasei option to license
The  Group  signed  an  Option  to  License  Agreement  with  Fujikura  Kasei  for  the  exclusive  supply  of  the  Group’s  propri-
etary antibodies for validation in Fujikura’s latex diagnostic platform. The agreement provided that Fujikura will proceed to 
exercise its option to license subject to reaching the minimum 500 picogram/ml limit of detection. The validation program 
was completed successfully and Fujikura Kasei exercised its option to license in July 2013. A definitive license agreement 
is currently being negotiated between Fujikura Kasei and the Group.
vii. Intellectual Property update
The Group has a large and valuable patent portfolio which consists of 87 patents across 21 patent families. Of these 62 
patents have been granted, 24 filed or under examination and one in PCT (Patent Cooperation Treaty) filing stage. 
The European Patent Office granted the therapeutic patent “Antibody Recognising C domain of midkine” with important 
claims around treatment of cancer in October 2013. Also in October 2013 the Japanese Patent office granted another 
midkine antibody patent entitled “Method for the treatment or prevention of diseases associated with a functional disorder 
of T Cells”. 
Financial position 
The  net  assets  of  the  Group  have  increased  by  7%  to  $5,663,726  ($5,305,157  at  30  June  2013).  Importantly,  current 
assets increased by 19% to $4,499,891 ($3,778,936 at 30 June 2013). The directors believe that the Group is in a stable 
financial position to carry out its current operations.
Significant changes in state of affairs 
There have been no significant changes in the state of affairs of entities in the Group during the year. 
Dividends paid or recommended 
The Company has not paid or declared any dividends during the financial year (2013: nil).
Events since the end of the financial year 
No matters or circumstances have arisen since the end of the financial year which significantly affected or could significantly 
affect the operations of the Group, the results of those operations or the state of affairs of the Group in future financial years.
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report  13
Directors’ Report 
Continued
Likely developments and expected results of operations 
Information  on  the  Group’s  likely  developments  in  the  operation  of  the  consolidated  entity  and  the  expected  results  of 
operations have not been included in this annual report.
Environmental regulations 
The Group’s operations are not regulated by any significant environmental regulations under a law of the Commonwealth 
or of a state or territory of Australia.
Proceedings on behalf of the Company 
No person has applied to the Court under section 237 of the Corporations Act 2001 for leave to bring proceedings on 
behalf of the Group, or to intervene in any proceedings to which the Group is a party, for the purpose of taking responsibility 
on behalf of the Group for all or part of those proceedings.
Meetings of directors 
Six meetings of the directors were held during the financial year (including committees of directors). Attendances by each 
director during the year were as follows: 
Directors’ 
Meetings
Audit 
Committee
Nomination  
Committee
Remuneration 
Committee
Number 
eligible to 
attend
Number 
attended
Number 
eligible to 
attend
Number 
attended
Number 
eligible to 
attend
Number 
attended
Number 
eligible to 
attend
Number 
attended
Dr David King
Ms Maria Halasz
Mr Martin Rogers
Mr Graeme Kaufman
6
6
6
6
5
6
4
4
6
-
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
-
-
3
3
-
-
3
3
-
3
3
3
-
3
3
The names, qualifications, experience and special responsibilities of each person who has been a director during the year 
and to the date of this report are:
Dr David King
Qualifications
– Chairman (Non-executive)
– Fellow of The Australian Institute of Company Directors, Fellow of the 
Australian Institute of Geoscientists and a PHD in Seismology from the 
Australian National University.
Experience
– Experience in high growth companies and a track record in starting 
business ventures and developing them into attractive investment and/
or take over targets.
Interest in shares and options
– Shares: 22,500,000 indirectly held. Options: 11, 250,000 indirectly held 
(Expiry: 23 October 2016, exercisable at $0.034 each).
Special responsibilities
– Chairman of the Remuneration Committee and Nomination Committee, 
Other directorships in listed entities 
held in the previous three years
and member of the Audit Committee. 
– Current directorships - Robust Resources Limited, Republic Gold 
Limited, Galilee Energy Limited, African Petroleum Corporation Limited 
and Tengri Resources 
Previous directorship - Gas2Grid Limited, Ausmon Resources Limited, 
Sapex Limited and Eastern Star Gas Limited.
14  Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ms Maria Halasz
Qualifications
Experience
Interest in shares and options
– Managing Director (Executive)
– A Graduate of the Australian Institute of Company Directors; MBA, BSc 
in microbiology.
– Over 20 years’ experience in biotechnology companies; initially working 
in executive positions in biotechnology firms, then managing investment 
funds and later holding senior positions in corporate finance specialis-
ing in life sciences.
– Shares: 13,050,000 directly held. 
Shares: 9,450,000 indirectly held. 
Options: 7,000,000 (Expiry: 20 November 2014, exercisable at $0.056 
each) indirectly held. 
Options: 1,500,000 (Expiry: 23 October 2016, exercisable at $0.034 
each) indirectly held. 
Options: 5,000,000 (Expiry: 15 June 2017, exercisable at $0.032 each) 
indirectly held.
Special responsibilities
– Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer.
Other  directorships  in  listed  entities 
held in the previous three years
– None
Mr Martin Rogers
Qualifications
Experience
– Director (Non-executive)
– Chemical Engineering and Science Degrees from University of New 
South Wales
– Mr Rogers has been both an investor and senior executive in a private 
funded advisory business in the science and biotechnology sectors, 
where he was instrumental in significantly increasing the value of those 
investments. Mr Rogers also holds a number of not-for-profit roles.
Interest in shares and options
– Shares: 5,155,700 shares indirectly held.  
Options: 41,000,000 (Expiry: 23 October 2016, exercisable at $0.034 
each) indirectly held
Special responsibilities
– Member of the Audit Committee and member of the Remuneration 
Committee
Other directorships in listed entities 
held in the previous three years
– Chairman of Actinogen Limited, non-executive director of Rhinomed 
Ltd and non-executive chairman of OncoSil Medical Limited
Mr Graeme Kaufman
– Director (Non-executive)
Qualification
Experience
– BSc & MBA from Melbourne University
– Over 46 years’ experience in biotechnology spanning technical, 
commercial and financial areas. Having worked for 34 years at CSL 
Limited, Australia’s largest biopharmaceutical company, he held senior 
positions including Production Director, General Manager Finance and 
General Manager Biosciences.
Interest in shares and options
– Nil
Special responsibilities
– Chairman of the Audit Committee and member of the Remuneration 
Other directorships in listed entities 
held in the previous three years
Committee and Nomination Committee.
– Bionomics Ltd and IDT Australia Ltd
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report  15
 
Directors’ Report 
Continued
Company Secretary 
Mr Jillian McGregor
–
Joint Company Secretary (Appointed 16 July 2013)
Qualifications
Experience
– Bachelor of commerce and law from University of New South Wales
–
Jillian has worked as a corporate lawyer for more than 15 years in mid 
and  top  tier  Australian  law  firms.  During  this  time  she  has  provided 
Corporations  Act  and  ASX  Listing  Rule  advice  to  many  ASX  listed 
companies including advice on related party transactions, capital raising 
requirements, and meeting continuous disclosure requirements.
Mr Nicholas Falzon
Qualifications
Experience
–
Joint Company Secretary and Financial Controller
– Bachelor of Business at UTS and a member of the Institute of Chartered 
Accountants of Australia
– As a partner at PKF Lawler Partners Nicholas works with a number of 
listed and unlisted companies advising them on all aspects of their finan-
cial management.
Directors have been in office since the start of the financial year to the date of this report unless otherwise stated.
Remuneration report (audited)
The information provided in this remuneration report has been audited as required by section 308 (3C) of the Corporations 
Act 2001.
Principles used to determine the nature and amount of remuneration 
The performance of the Group depends on the quality of its directors and executives. 
To  prosper,  the  Group  must  attract,  motivate  and  retain  highly  skilled  directors  and  executives.  To  this  end,  the  Group 
embodies the following principles in its remuneration framework:
•  provide competitive rewards to attract high calibre executives; and 
•  establish appropriate performance hurdles in relation to variable executive remuneration.
The Board assesses the appropriateness of the nature and amount of remuneration of directors and senior managers of 
the Group on a periodic basis by reference to relevant employment market conditions with the overall objective of ensuring 
maximum stakeholder benefit from the retention of a high quality Board and executive team.
Consolidated entity performance and link to remuneration
Remuneration for certain individuals is directly linked to performance of the consolidated entity. No performance based 
bonus or incentive payments are in place, however Maria Halasz has employee share options that will vest upon achieving 
key milestones being achieved. These Milestones are detailed in the Equity-based compensation section of this remunera-
tion report. 
The Nomination and Remuneration Committee is of the opinion that the continued improved results can be attributed in 
part to the adoption of performance based compensation and is satisfied that this improvement will continue to increase 
shareholder wealth if maintained over the coming years.
16  Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
 
 
 
The table below details the last five years earnings and total shareholders return.
Sales
EBITDA
EBIT
$
2014
$
2013
$
2012
$
2011
$
2010
1,150,931
541,649
132,826
149,735
325,999
(2,165,345)
(2,341,372)
(2,702,954)
(2,776,753)
(1,580,973)
(2,277,485)
(2,358,006)
(2,714,373)
(2,777,009)
(1,594,694)
Loss  after income tax
(1,480,836)
(1,541,307)
(1,972,483)
(2,269,637)
(1,339,948)
The factors that are considered to affect total shareholders return (‘TSR’) are summarised below:
Share price at financial year end 
Total dividends declared
Basic earnings per share
Remuneration structure 
$
2014
0.03
-
(0.21)
$
2013
0.02
-
(0.27)
$
2012
0.02
-
(0.46)
$
2011
0.02
-
(0.65)
$
2010
0.02
-
(0.48)
In  accordance  with  best  practice  corporate  governance,  the  structure  of  non-executive  director  and  senior  manager 
remuneration is separate and distinct.
Non-executive director remuneration
Objective 
The Board seeks to set aggregate remuneration at a level that provides the Group with the ability to attract and retain direc-
tors of the highest calibre, while incurring costs that are acceptable to shareholders.
Structure 
Each non-executive director receives a fixed fee for being a director of the Group. 
The constitution and the ASX listing Rules specify that the maximum aggregate remuneration of non-executive directors 
shall be determined from time to time by a general meeting of shareholders. At the general meeting of shareholders in 
2005, the maximum amount was set at $300,000 per annum. In 2014, the Group paid non-executive directors a total of 
$157,780 ($145,802 in 2013). 
The amount of aggregate remuneration sought to be approved by shareholders and the fixed fees paid to directors are 
reviewed annually. The Board considers fees paid to non-executive directors of comparable companies when undertaking 
the annual review process.
Executive remuneration 
Objective 
The Group aims to reward executives with a level and mix of remuneration commensurate with their position and respon-
sibilities within the Group and so as to:
• 
reward executives for Group and individual performance against targets set by reference to appropriate benchmarks;
•  align the interests of executives with those of shareholders; and 
•  ensure total remuneration is competitive by market standards.
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report  17
Directors’ Report 
Continued
Structure
A policy of the Board is the establishment of employment or consulting contracts with the CEO and other senior executives. 
Remuneration consists of fixed remuneration under an employment or consultancy agreement and may include long term 
equity based incentives that are subject to satisfaction of performance conditions. Details of these performance conditions 
are outlined in the equity based payments section of this remuneration report.The equity based incentives are intended to 
retain key executives and reward performance against agreed performance objectives.
Fixed remuneration
The level of fixed remuneration is set so as to provide a base level of remuneration that is both appropriate to the position 
and competitive in the market. 
Fixed remuneration is reviewed annually by the Board and the process consists of a review of Group wide and individual 
performance, relevant comparative remuneration in the market, and internal and (where appropriate) external advice on 
policies and practices. 
Senior  managers  are  given  the  opportunity  to  receive  their  fixed  (primary)  remuneration  in  a  variety  of  forms  including 
cash and expense payment plans, such that the manner of payment chosen is optimal for the recipient without creating 
additional cost for the Group.
Remuneration policy and performance 
Other than the CEO, Ms Halasz, none of the directors’ remuneration is at risk’ remuneration. Refer below for  further infor-
mation on Ms Halasz’s remuneration.
Remuneration details for the year ended 30 June 2014 
Details of the remuneration of the directors and key management personnel of the group (as defined in AASB 124 Related 
Party Disclosures) and the highest paid executives of Cellmid are set out in the following tables.
2014
Cash salary fees 
Cash bonus
Superannuation
Options
Short term benefits
Post  
employment 
benefits
Share 
based 
payments
$
5,999
3,448
-
-
$
-
-
-
-
Total
$
70,999
40,948
45,833
157,780
27,750
52,047
514,268
-
-
-
37,197
52,047
672,048
Non-executive directors
David King
Graeme Kaufman
Martin Rogers
Total non-executive directors
Executive directors and key management
Maria Halasz
Nicholas Falzon1
$
65,000
37,500
45,833
148,333
434,471
-
582,804
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18  Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
2013
Cash salary fees 
Cash bonus
Superannuation
Options
Short term benefits
Post 
employment
Share 
based 
payments
Non-executive directors
David King
Graeme Kaufman
Martin Rogers
Robin Beaumont2
Total non-executive directors
Executive directors and key management
Maria Halasz
Nicholas Falzon1
$
65,000
34,058
33,062
4,767
136,887
400,000
-
536,887
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
5,850
3,065
-
-
8,915
36,000
-
44,915
$
-
-
-
             -
-
-
-
-
Total
$
70,850
37,123
33,062
4,767
145,802
436,000
-
581,802
1.  Nicholas  Falzon,  company  secretary,  was  appointed  on  6  October  2010,  is  a  director  of  PKF  Lawler  Partners  Pty 
Ltd who provides accounting and company secretarial services to Cellmid Limited. The contract is based on normal 
commercial terms. A total of $105,600 ($92,125 in 2013) was received by PKF Lawler Partners Pty Limited in relation 
to this contract for the year.
2.  Robin Beaumont resigned as director on 27th August 2012.
KMP shareholdings 
The number of shares held in the company during the financial year by each director and key management personnel of 
Cellmid Limited, including their personally related parties, are set out below. 
Balance  
at beginning  
of year
Received 
as part of 
remuneration
Other  
changes
Balance at  
end of year
22,500,000
-
-
22,500,000
6,750,000
12,000,000
3,750,000
22,500,000
-
5,155,700
22,500,000
2,725,250
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5,155,700
22,500,000
4,024,750
6,750,000
-
-
5,155,700
5,155,700
2014
David King
Maria Halasz
Graeme Kaufman
Martin Rogers
2013
David King
Maria Halasz
Graeme Kaufman
Martin Rogers
KMP option holdings 
The number of options held in the company during the financial year by each director and member of key management 
personnel of Cellmid Limited, including their personally related parties, are set out below. 
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report  19
 
Directors’ Report 
Continued
Balance at 
beginning of 
year
11,250,000
16,362,625
1,000,000
44,000,000
-
17,000,000
-
-
2014
David King
Maria Halasz
Graeme Kaufman
Martin Rogers
2013
David King
Maria Halasz
Graeme Kaufman
Martin Rogers
-
-
-
-
-
-
Acquired
Expired/ 
forfeited
Other 
changes
Balance at 
end of year
Vested and 
exercisable 
at end of 
year
-
-
137,375
(3,000,000)
(1,000,000)
(3,000,000)
-
-
-
-
11,250,000
11,250,000
13,500,000
13,500,000
-
-
41,000,000
41,000,000
-
-
-
-
11,250,000
11,250,000
11,250,000
(637,375)
16,362,625
16,362,625
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
44,000,000
44,000,000
44,000,000
Relationship between remuneration policy and company performance 
The relative proportions of remuneration that are linked to performance and those that are fixed are as follows: 
Fixed remuneration
At risk STI
At risk LTI
2014
2013
2014
2013
2014
2013
Directors
David King
Maria Halasz
Graeme Kaufman
Martin Rogers
100%
89.9%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Other key management personnel
Nicholas Falzon
100%
100%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10.1%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Service agreements
The CEO, Maria Halasz, is an employee of the group under an agreement signed on 21 September 2007. Under the terms 
of the present contact:
•  Ms  Halasz  may  resign  from  her  position  and  thus  terminate  this  contract  by  giving  six  months’  written  notice.  On 
resignation any unvested options will be forfeited.
•  The group may terminate the employment agreement by providing six months’ written notice or providing payment in 
lieu of the notice period (based on the fixed component of Ms Halasz’s remuneration).
•  The group may terminate the contract at any time without notice if serious misconduct has occurred. Where termination 
with cause occurs, the CEO is only entitled to that portion of remuneration which is fixed, and only up to the date of 
termination. On termination with cause, any unvested options will immediately be forfeited.
•  Ms Halasz’s employment agreement provides for issuing performance incentives subject to the discretion of the board. 
During the 2014 financial year there has been no performance incentive issued to Ms Halasz.
20  Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
 
 
Equity based compensation 
Details of the options granted as remuneration to those key management personnel and executives during the year:
Share based payments
Options 
Granted in 
2014
Value of 
options at 
grant date
Options 
vested in 
2014
Directors
David King
Maria Halasz1
Graeme Kaufman
Martin Rogers
Other key management personnel
Nick Falzon
No
-
$
-
12,000,000
219,600
-
-
-
-
-
-
No
-
-
-
-
-
Value of 
options 
expensed in 
2014 
$
-
52,047
-
-
-
Proportion of 
remuneration
-
10.1%
-
-
-
1.  On  25  November  2013,  12,000,000  loan  shares  were  granted  to  Maria  Halasz  in  three  equal  tranches  under  the 
Cellmid Limited and Controlled Entities Employee Incentive Plan and as approved by shareholders at the annual general 
meeting on 22 November 2013. Ordinary shares were issued under the arrangement funded by a limited recourse loan 
with the following vesting conditions attached: 
Tranche
Vesting date
Shares
Vesting condition
1
2
3
25/11/2016
4,000,000
25/11/2016
4,000,000
25/11/2016
4,000,000
Shares will vest at any time before the vesting date when the 
Group’s operating revenue reaches a total of $4,000,000 over 
any consecutive 12 months.
Shares will vest at any time before the vesting date subject 
to the first patient being recruited into the Group’s planned 
midkine antibody trial.
Shares will vest at any time before the vesting date subject to 
the signing of one of the following agreements for the Group’s 
consumer health products in a territory outside of Australia and 
Japan:  
(a) a diagnostic or therapeutic licence; or 
(b) a distribution agreement.
The effect of the arrangement is akin to an option. 
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report  21
Directors’ Report 
Continued
Shares under option 
Unissued ordinary shares of the Company under option at the date of this report are as follows:
Unlisted options
Unlisted options
Unlisted options
Unlisted options
Unlisted options
Unlisted options
Listed options
Unlisted options
Unlisted options
Expiry date
1 July 2014
20 November 2014
20 November 2014
19 February 2015
15 November 2015
15 November 2016
23 October 2016
15 June 2017
14 August 2017
Exercise Price
Number under option
$ 0.05
$ 0.06
$ 0.04
$ 0.06
$ 0.10
$ 0.03
$ 0.03
$ 0.03
$ 0.03
5,002,006
7,000,000
2,000,000
600,000
100,000
3,971,962
290,542,770
5,000,000
1,440,000
315,656,738
No shares were issued on the exercise of options during the financial year ended 30 June 2014 (nil in 2013). No further 
shares have been issued on exercise of options since 30 June 2014. 
12,000,000 shares were held in escrow and unpaid at 30 June 2014 (nil in 2013). Refer to note 18(a) for further details.  
38,448,435 options were lapsed during the financial year ended 30 June 2014 (2,000,000 in 2013).
Loans to directors and other members of key management personnel 
There were no loans to directors or other members of key management personnel during or since the end of the 
financial year.
Other
On the 25th of November 2013, the Company acquired the remaining 5% interest in its subsidiary, Advangen International 
Pty Ltd from Direct Capital Group Pty Limited. Direct Capital Group Pty Limited is a company wholly owned by Maria Halasz 
and was acquired for a consideration of 3,515,625 shares in Cellmid Limited, with a market value of $119,531.
Indemnification and insurance of officers and auditors
During the financial year, the Group paid a premium to insure the directors and officers of the Group.
The liabilities insured are legal costs that may be incurred in defending civil or criminal proceedings that may be brought 
against the officers in their capacity as officers of the Group, and any other payments arising from liabilities incurred by the 
officers in connection with such proceedings. This does not include such liabilities (other than legal costs) that arise from 
conduct involving a wilful breach of duty by the officers or the improper use by the officers of their position or of informa-
tion to gain advantage for them or someone else or to cause detriment to the Company. It is not possible to apportion the 
premium between amounts relating to the insurance against legal costs and those relating to other liabilities. 
During or since the end of the financial year, the Group has given an indemnity or entered into an agreement to indemnify, 
or paid or agreed to pay insurance premiums in favour of its directors as follows:
•  a right to access certain Board papers of the Group during the period of their tenure and for a period of seven years 
after that tenure ends
22  Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
•  subject to the Corporation Act 2001, an indemnity in respect of liability to persons other the Company and its related 
bodies  corporate  that  they  may  incur  while  acting  in  their  capacity  as  an  officer  of  the  Company  or  a  related  body 
corporate, except for specified liabilities where that liability involves a lack of good faith or is for legal costs for defending 
certain legal proceedings; and
• 
the requirement that the Group maintain appropriate directors’ and officers’ insurance for the officer.
No liability has arisen under these indemnities as at the date of the report.
There is no indemnity cover in favour of the auditor of the Group during the financial year.
Non audit services 
The Group may decide to employ the auditor on assignments additional to their statutory audit duties where the auditor’s 
expertise and experience with the Group and/or the Group are important. Details of the amounts paid or payable to the 
auditor, BDO for audit and non audit services provided during the year are set out below.
The  nature  of  the  services  provided  does  not  compromise  the  general  principles  relating  to  auditor  independence  in 
accordance with APES 110: Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants set by the Accounting Professional and Ethical 
Standards Board.
Auditing or reviewing the financial statements
BDO East Coast Partnership – Australia
BDO Toyo & Co - Japan
2014
$
52,500
10,479
62,979
2013
$
54,900
10,200
65,100
ASIC class order 98/100 rounding of amounts 
The Company is an entity to which ASIC Class Order 98/100 applies and, accordingly, amounts in the financial statements 
and directors’ report have been rounded to the nearest dollar, unless otherwise indicated.
This concludes the remuneration report which has been audited.
Auditor’s independence declaration 
The auditor’s independence declaration in accordance with section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001 for the year ended 
30 June 2014 has been received and can be found on page 56 of the financial report.
This director’s report, incorporating the remuneration report, is signed in accordance with a resolution of the Board 
of Directors.
Director 
Dr David King 
Dated this 29th day of August 2014
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report  23
 
 
24  Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
Corporate 
Governance statement
Unless disclosed below, all the recommendations of the ASX Corporate Governance Council (including 2010 amendments) 
have been applied for the entire financial year ended 30 June 2014 (ASX Principles).
Board Composition
The skills, experience and expertise relevant to the position of each director who is in office at the date of the annual report 
and their term of office are detailed in the directors’ report. 
The names of independent directors that have served on the board of directors of the company (Board) during the period are:
o  David King
o  Graeme Kaufman
o  Martin Rogers
Independent directors are those who have the ability to exercise their duties unfettered by any business or other relationship 
and are willing to express their opinions free of concern about their position or the position of any third party. The Board 
does not believe it is possible to draft a list of criteria which is appropriate to characterise, in all circumstances, whether a 
non-executive director is independent. However, in determining the independent status of a director the Board will consider 
whether the director:
o 
is  a  substantial  shareholder  of  the  Company  or  an  officer  of,  or  otherwise  associated  directly  with,  a  substantial 
shareholder of the Company; 
o 
is employed, or has previously been employed in an executive capacity by the Company or another group member; 
o  has within the last three years been a principal of a material professional adviser or a material consultant to the Company 
or another group member, or an employee materially associated with the service provided; 
o 
is a material supplier or customer of the Company or another group member, or an officer of or otherwise associated 
directly or indirectly with a material supplier or customer; 
o  has a material contractual relationship with the Company or another group member other than as a director.
In some cases the Board needs to make an assessment of the materiality of a relationship in order to determine if a direc-
tor is independent. A “material relationship” includes a direct or indirect interest or relationship that could reasonably be 
considered to influence in a material way the director’s decisions in relation to the Company. When considering whether a 
relationship is “material”, the Board will consider the materiality to each of the Company, the director and the person or or-
ganisation with which the director is related (as customer, supplier, or adviser). The Board has not set materiality thresholds, 
considering it more effective to assess relationships on the individual circumstances applicable on a case by case basis and 
where appropriate, with the assistance of external advice. 
Independent directors have the right to seek independent professional advice in the furtherance of their duties as directors 
at the Company’s expense. Written approval must be obtained from the Chairman prior to incurring any expense on behalf 
of the Company. 
David King, Graeme Kaufman and Martin Rogers are members of the nomination committee. These members have attend-
ed meetings of the nomination committee on an ad hoc basis as needed during the year. When appointing new directors, 
the Board and the nomination committee look to ensure that an appropriate balance of skills, experience, expertise and 
diversity is maintained. The Board has not approved a formal nomination committee charter and as such, no such charter 
or summary of such charter is disclosed on the Company’s website.
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report  25
Corporate Governance 
Continued
Ethical Standards
The Board acknowledges and emphasises the importance of all directors and employees maintaining the highest stand-
ards of corporate governance practice and ethical conduct. 
A code of conduct has been established requiring directors and employees to:
•  act honestly and in good faith; 
•  exercise due care and diligence in fulfilling the functions of office; 
•  avoid conflicts and make full disclosure of any possible conflict of interest; 
•  comply with the law; 
•  encourage the reporting and investigating of unlawful and unethical behaviour; and 
•  comply with the share trading policy outlined in the code of conduct. 
Directors are obliged to be independent in judgment and ensure all reasonable steps are taken to ensure due care is taken 
by the Board in making sound decisions.
Diversity Policy
Diversity  includes,  but  is  not  limited  to,  gender,  age,  ethnicity  and  cultural  background.  The  Company  is  committed  to 
diversity and recognises the benefits arising from employee and Board diversity and the importance of benefiting from all 
available talent.
Induction
All new directors participate in a formal induction process co-ordinated by the company secretary.  This induction process 
includes briefings on the Company’s financial, strategic, operational and risk management position, the Company’s govern-
ance framework and key developments in the Company and the industry and environment in which it operates. 
The Board believes that the Company benefits from this diversity. 
However, due to the size of the Company and small number of persons employed by the Company and its controlled enti-
ties, the Board has not established a formal diversity policy in accordance with Recommendation 3.2 of the ASX Principles. 
As such and for the same reasons, the Company is not able to disclose in this annual report the measurable objectives for 
achieving gender diversity in accordance with the diversity policy and progress towards achieving those objectives. 
The Company is able to disclose the following gender diversity statistics for the Company and its controlled entities as at 
the date of this annual report:
•  women employees (67%); 
•  women in senior executive positions (57%); and 
•  women on the Board (25%).
Trading policy
The Company has a policy on the sale and purchase of its securities by its directors and employees. In addition, this policy 
applies to advisers, contractors and consultants who may obtain confidential or price sensitive information in relation to 
the Company. 
The purpose of the policy is to avoid conduct known as ‘insider trading’. In some respects, the Company’s policy extends 
beyond the strict requirements of the Corporations Act 200 1 (Cth) (Corporations Act).
26  Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
 
Audit Committee
The names and qualifications of those appointed to the audit committee and their attendance at meetings of the committee 
are included in the directors’ report.
CEO/CFO Declaration
As required by section 295A of the Corporations Act, the CEO and CFO have declared that in their opinion:
a.  the financial records of the Company and controlled entities for the financial year have been properly maintained in 
accordance with section 286 of the Corporations Act; 
b.  the financial statements and notes for the financial year comply with accounting standards; 
c.  the financial statements and notes for the financial year give a true and fair view of the financial position and performance 
of the Company and its controlled entities in accordance section 297 of the Corporations Act; 
d.  any other matters prescribed by the Corporations Regulations in relation to the financial statements and notes for the 
financial year have been satisfied.
In addition, in accordance with Recommendation 7.3 of the ASX Principles, the CEO and CFO stated to the Board that, 
the declaration provided under section 295A of the Corporations Act is founded on a sound system of risk management 
and internal control and that the system is operating effectively in all material respects in relation to financial reporting risks.
Performance Evaluation
An annual performance evaluation of the Board has not been made during the year. 
A performance evaluation for the CEO has taken place during the financial year in accordance with the evaluation process 
disclosed by the Company. This evaluation has been conducted by the Chairman on a quarterly basis during the year with 
regard to performance measures set at the commencement of the year. 
A performance evaluation for other senior management has been conducted by the CEO during the financial year in ac-
cordance with the evaluation process disclosed by the Company.
Board Roles and Responsibilities
The Board is first and foremost accountable to its shareholders through delivery of timely and balanced disclosures. 
The Board sought external guidance to assist the drafting of its “Board Charter” which has been made publicly available on 
the Company’s website. This document details the adopted practices and processes in relation to matters reserved for the 
Board’s consideration and decision making. The Board is ultimately responsible for ensuring its actions are in accordance 
with key corporate governance principles. 
Shareholder Rights
Shareholders are entitled to vote on significant matters impacting on the business, which include the election and remu-
neration of directors and changes to the constitution. Shareholders are strongly encouraged to attend and participate in 
the Annual General Meetings of the company, to lodge questions to be answered by the Board and/or the CEO, and are 
able to appoint proxies.
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report  27
Risk Management
The Board considers identification and management of key risks associated with the business as vital to maximise share-
holder wealth. A yearly assessment of the business’s risk profile is undertaken and reviewed by the Board, covering all 
aspects of the business from the operational level through to strategic level risks. The CEO has been delegated the task 
of implementing internal controls to identify and manage risks for which the Board provides oversight and is required to 
report to the Board on whether such risks are being managed effectively. The effectiveness of the implemented internal 
controls is monitored and reviewed regularly. During the year, the CEO has reported to the Board as to the effectiveness of 
the Company’s management of its material business risks.
Remuneration Policies
The Company’s remuneration committee comprises of the following non-executive directors:
o  David King (Chair, independent) 
o  Graeme Kaufman (independent) 
o  Martin Rogers (independent)
The remuneration committee reviews the senior executive packages annually by reference to Company performance, ex-
ecutive performance, comparable information from industry sectors and other listed companies and independent advice. 
Executives may also be entitled to participate in the Company’s employee incentive plan. 
The amounts of remuneration for all key management personnel for the Company, including all monetary and non monetary 
components, are detailed in the directors’ report under the heading key management personnel compensation. All remu-
neration paid to executives is valued at the cost to the Company and expensed. Shares given to executives are valued as 
the difference between the market price of those shares and the amount paid by the executive. Options are valued using 
the Black Scholes methodology. 
The Board expects that the remuneration structure implemented will result in the Company being able to attract and retain 
the best executives to run the consolidated group. It will also provide executives with the necessary incentives to work to 
grow long term shareholder value. 
The payment of bonuses, options and other incentive payments are reviewed by the remuneration committee annually as 
part of the review of executive remuneration and a recommendation is put to the Board for approval. All bonuses, options 
and incentives must be linked to predetermined performance criteria. The Board can exercise its discretion in relation to 
approving  incentives,  bonuses  and  options  and  can  recommend  changes  to  the  committee’s  recommendations.  Any 
changes must be justified by reference to measurable performance criteria.
Remuneration Committee
The names of the members of the remuneration committee and their attendance at meetings of the committee are detailed 
in the directors’ report.
The Board has not approved a formal remuneration committee charter and as such, no such charter or summary of such 
charter is disclosed on the Company’s website. 
There are no schemes for retirement benefits other than statutory superannuation for non-executive directors.
28  Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
financial 
Report
31
32
33
34
35
69
70
Contents
Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Notes to the Financial Statements
Directors’ Declaration
Independent Auditor’s Report 
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report  29
Consolidated statement of 
profit or Loss and Other 
Comprehensive income 
for the year ended 30 June 2014
Consolidated
Revenue
Other revenue
Other income
Less Expenditure
Cost of sales
Advertisement and marketing expense
Bad debts expense
Consultancy expenses
Conferences and meetings
Communication expenses
Depreciation and amortisation expense
Employee benefits expense
Finance costs
Gain/(Loss) on foreign exchange
Occupancy expenses
Professional fees
Research and development expenses
Share based compensation
Subscription expenses
Travel expenses
Other expenses
Loss before income tax
Income tax benefit
Loss for the year after income tax
Other comprehensive income, net of income tax
Note 
3
3
3
2014
$
1,150,931
1,123,956
521,061
2,795,948
(333,085)
(257,763)
(978)
(452,376)
(150,653)
(88,982)
(112,140)
2013
$
541,649
55,597
164,042
761,288
(84,606)
(214,411)
(1,227)
(422,171)
(47,314)
(37,122)
(16,634)
(1,702,980)
(1,036,123)
(2,511)
(28,926)
(195,236)
 (84,214) 
 (722,882) 
 (133,523) 
 (95,091) 
 (253,302) 
 (409,248) 
(1,124)
13,338
(102,058)
(108,434)
(475,361)
(4,032)
(71,035)
(201,255)
(278,892)
(2,227,942)
(2,327,173)
5
747,106
785,866
(1,480,836)
(1,541,307)
Items that will be reclassified to profit or loss when specific conditions are met
Exchange differences on translating foreign controlled entities
Total comprehensive income for the year
Loss for the year attributable to:
Owners of Cellmid Limited
Non controlling interest
Total comprehensive income attributable to:
Owners of Cellmid Limited
Non controlling interest
(180,898)
216,257
(1,661,734)
(1,325,050)
(1,473,815)
(1,528,041)
(7,021)
(13,266)
(1,480,836)
(1,541,307)
(1,654,713)
(1,311,784)
(7,021)
(13,266)
(1,661,734)
(1,325,050)
Loss per share for loss attributable to the ordinary equity holders of the company
Basic loss per share (cents)
Diluted loss per share (cents)
9
9
(0.21)
(0.21)
(0.27)
(0.27)
The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements.
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report  31
Consolidated statement of 
financial position
As at 30 June 2014
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other receivables
Inventories
Other assets
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
NON CURRENT ASSETS
Plant and equipment
Intangible assets
TOTAL NON CURRENT ASSETS
TOTAL ASSETS
LIABILITIES
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Trade and other payables
Employee benefits
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
NON CURRENT LIABILITIES
Employee benefits
TOTAL NON CURRENT LIABILITIES
TOTAL LIABILITIES
NET ASSETS
EQUITY
Issued capital
Reserves
Accumulated losses
Capital and reserves attributable to owners of Cellmid Limited
Non controlling interest
TOTAL EQUITY
32  Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
Consolidated
2014
$
2013
$
Note
10
11
12
15
13
14
16
17
17
18
19
2,501,753
220,471
1,709,365
68,302
1,754,994
255,695
1,694,926
73,321
4,499,891
3,778,936
43,269
1,911,265
1,954,534
6,454,425
51,633
2,163,150
2,214,783
5,993,719
563,183
166,254
729,437
61,262
61,262
790,699
5,663,726
501,299
134,755
636,054
52,508
52,508
688,562
5,305,157
27,401,832
25,336,522
1,705,205
1,966,375
(23,443,311)
(21,969,496)
5,663,726
-
5,663,726
5,333,401
(28,244)
5,305,157
 
Consolidated statement of 
Changes in Equity
for the year ended 30 June 2014
y
t
i
u
q
E
l
a
t
o
T
s
t
s
e
r
e
t
n
I
l
a
t
o
T
n
o
N
g
n
i
l
l
o
r
t
n
o
c
d
e
t
a
l
s
e
s
s
o
L
-
u
m
u
c
c
A
i
n
g
e
r
o
F
e
v
r
e
s
e
R
e
g
n
a
h
c
x
E
e
r
a
h
S
d
e
s
a
B
l
a
r
e
n
e
G
e
v
r
e
s
e
R
e
v
r
e
s
e
R
s
t
n
e
m
y
a
P
e
v
r
e
s
e
R
n
o
i
t
i
s
u
q
c
A
i
d
e
u
s
s
I
l
a
t
i
p
a
C
e
t
o
N
4
2
5
,
4
7
0
3
5
,
8
7
1
,
2
)
0
2
2
,
3
1
1
(
-
-
-
)
1
3
5
,
9
1
1
(
5
6
2
,
5
3
4
2
5
,
4
7
0
3
5
,
8
7
1
,
2
)
0
2
2
,
3
1
1
(
)
6
9
7
,
4
5
1
(
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
)
6
3
8
,
0
8
4
,
1
(
)
1
2
0
,
7
(
)
5
1
8
,
3
7
4
,
1
(
)
5
1
8
,
3
7
4
,
1
(
-
)
8
9
8
,
0
8
1
(
-
)
8
9
8
,
0
8
1
(
-
)
8
9
8
,
0
8
1
(
)
,
4
3
7
1
6
6
1
,
(
)
1
2
0
,
7
(
)
,
3
1
7
4
5
6
1
(
,
)
5
1
8
,
3
7
4
,
1
(
)
8
9
8
,
0
8
1
(
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
2
5
,
4
7
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
7
5
1
,
5
0
3
,
5
)
4
4
2
,
8
2
(
1
0
4
,
3
3
3
,
5
)
6
9
4
,
9
6
9
,
1
2
(
7
5
2
,
6
1
2
5
5
8
,
2
2
3
6
2
,
7
2
7
,
1
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
2
2
5
,
6
3
3
,
5
2
3
1
0
2
y
u
J
1
l
t
a
e
c
n
a
a
B
l
-
-
-
-
0
3
5
8
7
1
,
,
2
)
0
2
2
3
1
1
,
(
9
1
e
m
o
c
n
i
i
e
v
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
c
r
e
h
t
O
i
e
v
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
c
l
a
t
o
T
r
a
e
y
e
h
t
r
o
f
e
m
o
c
n
i
r
e
t
f
a
r
a
e
y
e
h
t
r
o
f
s
s
o
L
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
i
l
s
r
e
d
o
h
y
t
i
u
q
e
h
t
i
w
s
n
o
i
t
c
a
s
n
a
r
T
9
1
8
1
n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c
d
e
s
a
b
e
r
a
h
S
e
h
t
g
n
i
r
u
d
d
e
u
s
s
i
s
e
r
a
h
S
s
t
s
o
c
n
o
i
t
c
a
s
n
a
r
T
r
a
e
y
)
6
9
7
,
4
5
1
(
-
9
1
g
n
i
l
l
o
r
t
n
o
c
n
o
n
i
e
s
n
g
o
c
e
r
e
D
t
s
e
r
e
t
n
i
6
2
7
,
3
6
6
5
,
-
6
2
7
3
6
6
,
,
5
)
1
1
3
,
3
4
4
,
3
2
(
9
5
3
,
5
3
5
5
8
,
2
2
7
8
7
,
1
0
8
,
1
)
6
9
7
,
4
5
1
(
2
3
8
,
1
0
4
,
7
2
4
1
0
2
e
n
u
J
0
3
t
a
e
c
n
a
a
B
l
4
8
4
,
9
8
0
,
2
)
8
7
9
,
4
1
(
2
6
4
,
4
0
1
,
2
)
5
5
4
,
1
4
4
,
0
2
(
)
7
0
3
,
1
4
5
,
1
(
)
6
6
2
,
3
1
(
)
1
4
0
,
8
2
5
,
1
(
)
1
4
0
,
8
2
5
,
1
(
-
-
3
3
0
,
4
0
9
6
,
6
3
5
,
4
-
-
3
3
0
,
4
0
9
6
,
6
3
5
,
4
-
-
-
-
7
5
2
,
6
1
2
-
7
5
2
,
6
1
2
-
7
5
2
,
6
1
2
)
,
0
5
0
5
2
3
1
,
(
)
6
6
2
,
3
1
(
)
,
4
8
7
1
1
3
1
(
,
)
1
4
0
,
8
2
5
,
1
(
7
5
2
,
6
1
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
3
0
,
4
5
5
8
,
2
2
0
3
2
,
3
2
7
,
1
7
5
1
,
5
0
3
5
,
)
4
4
2
,
8
2
(
1
0
4
,
3
3
3
,
5
)
6
9
4
,
9
6
9
,
1
2
(
7
5
2
,
6
1
2
5
5
8
,
2
2
3
6
2
,
7
2
7
,
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
3
8
,
9
9
7
,
0
2
2
1
0
2
l
y
u
J
1
t
a
e
c
n
a
a
B
l
-
-
-
-
0
9
6
,
6
3
5
4
,
9
1
e
m
o
c
n
i
i
e
v
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
c
r
e
h
t
O
i
e
v
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
c
l
a
t
o
T
e
m
o
c
n
i
r
e
t
f
a
r
a
e
y
e
h
t
r
o
f
s
s
o
L
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
i
l
s
r
e
d
o
h
y
t
i
u
q
e
h
t
i
w
s
n
o
i
t
c
a
s
n
a
r
T
8
1
9
1
n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c
d
e
s
a
b
e
r
a
h
S
y
t
i
u
q
e
f
o
n
o
i
t
u
b
i
r
t
n
o
C
2
2
5
,
6
3
3
,
5
2
3
1
0
2
e
n
u
J
0
3
t
a
e
c
n
a
a
B
l
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report  33
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated statement of 
Cash flows
for the year ended 30 June 2014
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Receipts from customers (inclusive of GST)
Payments to suppliers and employees (inclusive of GST)
Research and development expenses
Interest received
Income tax benefit
Other grant income
Finance costs
Consolidated
2014
$
2013
$
Note 
1,856,193
644,080
(4,268,421)
(2,552,229)
(722,882)
(475,361)
52,026
754,233
91,542
(2,496)
30,833
785,866
115,167
(1,124)
Net cash used in operating activities
20
(2,239,805)
(1,452,768)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Payment for acquisition of subsidiary, net of cash acquired
Proceeds on sale of financial asset
Purchase of non current assets
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from issue of shares (net of share issue costs)
Net cash provided by financing activities
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents held
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of financial year
Effect of exchange rate changes
-
(803,911)
1,000,260
(3,259)
997,001
91,785
(26,734)
(738,860)
2,006,313
2,006,313
2,864,561
2,864,561
763,509
672,933
1,754,994
1,050,593
(16,750)
31,468
Cash and cash equivalents at end of financial year
10
2,501,753
1,754,994
34  Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
 
notes to the 
financial statements
Contents 
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
2. Parent Information
3. Revenue and Other Income
4. Profit/(Loss) for the year
5.
Income Tax Expense
6. Business Combinations
7.
Interests of Key Management Personnel (KMP)
8. Auditor’s Remuneration
9. Earnings per Share
10. Cash and Cash Equivalents
11. Trade and Other Receivables
12.
Inventories
13. Plant and Equipment
14.
Intangible Assets
15. Other Assets
16. Trade and Other Payables
17. Provisions
18. Contributed Equity
19. Reserves
20. Cash Flow Information
21. Events after the Reporting Period
22. Related Party Transactions
23. Financial Risk Management
24.
Interests in Subsidiaries
25. Segment Information
26. Commitments
27. Contingent liabilities and Contingent assets
28. Share Based Payments
29. Company Details
36
47
48
48
49
51
52
52
53
53
54
54
54
55
56
56
56
57
59
60
60
60
61
63
63
64
65
65
66
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report  35
notes to the financial statements 
Continued
NOTE 1: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Statement of compliance
The Company is a public company, listed on the Australian Stock Exchange. It is incorporated in Australia and is domiciled 
in Australia.
The financial statements are general purpose financial statements that have been prepared in accordance with Austral-
ian  Accounting  Standards,  Australian  Accounting  Interpretations,  other  authoritative  pronouncements  of  the  Australian 
Accounting Standards Board and the Corporations Act 2001, as appropriate for profit oriented entities. These financial 
statements also comply with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Stand-
ards Board (IASB) 
The financial statements comprise the consolidated financial statements of the Group. 
The financial statements were authorised for issue by the directors on 29 August 2014.
Basis of Preparation 
The financial statements have been prepared on an accruals basis and are based on historical costs, except for certain 
non current assets and financial instruments that are measured at re-valued amounts or fair values, as explained in the 
accounting policies below. Historical cost is generally based on the fair values of the consideration given in exchange for 
assets. All amounts are presented in Australian dollars, unless otherwise noted. 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with AIFRS requires the use of certain accounting estimates. It also 
requires  management  to  exercise  its  judgement  in  the  process  of  applying  the  group’s  accounting  policies.  The  areas 
involving a higher degree of judgement or complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the 
financial statements, are disclosed in Note 1(w). 
New, revised or amending Accounting Standards and Interpretations adopted
During the current year, the following standards became mandatory and have been adopted retrospectively by the Group:
•  AASB 10 Consolidated Financial Statements
•  AASB 11 Joint Arrangements
•  AASB 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities
•  AASB 13 Fair Value Measurement
•  AASB 119 Employee Benefits
•  AASB 127 Separate Financial Statements
•  AASB  2011  4  Amendments  to  Australian  Accounting  Standards  to  Remove  Individual  Key  Management  Personnel 
Disclosure Requirements [AASB 124] 
•  AASB 2011 7 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from the Consolidation and Joint Arrangements 
Standards [AASB 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 101, 107, 112, 118, 121, 124, 132, 133, 136, 138, 139, 1023 & 1038 and Interpreta-
tions 5, 9, 16 & 17]
•  AASB 2012 9 Amendments to AASB 1048 arising from the Withdrawal of Australian Interpretation 1039
•  AASB 2012 2 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards Disclosures Offsetting Financial Assets and 
36  Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
Financial Liabilities
The accounting policies have been updated to reflect changes in the recognition and measurement of assets, liabilities, 
income and expenses and the impact of adoption of these standards is discussed below.
AASB 10 Consolidated Financial Statements is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013 
and therefore the Group has applied it for the first time in these financial statements. AASB 10 includes a new definition of 
control, including additional guidance for specific situations such as control in a principal / agent situation and when holding 
less than majority voting rights may give control. AASB 10 supersedes the previous requirements of AASB 127 Consoli-
dated and Separate Financial Statements and Interpretation 112 Consolidation Special Purpose Entities and resulted in 
consequential amendments to a number of other standards.
The Group has reviewed its investment in other entities to determine whether any changes were required to the Group 
under AASB 10. The composition of the Group is the same under AASB 10 and therefore there is no change to the reported 
financial position and performance.
AASB 11 Joint Arrangements replaces AASB 131 Interests in Joint Ventures and Interpretation 112 Jointly Controlled Enti-
ties Nonmonetary Contributions by Venturers as well as consequential amendments to a number of other standards. AASB 
11 uses the revised definition of control from AASB 10 and once joint control is determined, then classifies joint arrange-
ments as either joint ventures or joint operations. Joint ventures are accounted for using the equity method, proportionate 
consolidation is not permitted under AASB 11. Joint operations are accounted for by incorporating the venturer’s share of 
assets, liabilities, income and expenses into the financial statements. There were no changes to the accounting for joint 
arrangements under AASB 11.
AASB 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities includes all disclosures relating to an entity’s interest in associates, joint 
arrangements, subsidiaries and structured entities. On adoption of AASB 12, additional disclosures have been included in 
the financial statements in relation to investments held.
AASB 13 Fair Value Measurement does not change what and when assets or liabilities are recorded at fair value. It provides 
guidance on how to measure assets and liabilities at fair value, including the concept of highest and best use for nonfinan-
cial assets. AASB 13 has not had an impact on the Group as no assets or liabilities are held at fair value.
AASB 119 Employee benefits changes the basis for determining the income or expense relating to defined benefit plans 
and introduces revised definitions for short-term employee benefits and termination benefits.
The Group reviewed the annual leave liability to determine the level of annual leave which is expected to be paid more than 
12 months after the end of the reporting period. Whilst this has been considered to be a long-term employee benefits for 
the purpose of measuring the leave under AASB 119, the effect of discounting was not considered to be material and 
therefore has not been performed.
AASB 2011 4 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards to Remove Individual Key Management Personnel Disclo-
sure Requirements [AASB 124] to Remove Individual Key Management Personnel Disclosure Requirements removes the 
individual key management personnel (KMP) disclosures contained in Aus paragraphs 29.1 to 29.9.3. 
The individual disclosures are not required by either AASB 124’s international equivalent IAS 24 Related Parties (which 
requires only aggregate, rather than individual, amounts of KMP compensation) or its New Zealand equivalent. In addition, 
the AASB believes that these disclosures are more in the nature of governance and so are better dealt with as part of the 
Corporations Act 2001. 
As a result, the detailed individual KMP remuneration has been removed from Note 6. In accordance with the transition 
provisions in the standard, the comparative figures have been restated.
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report  37
 
notes to the financial statements 
Continued
a.  Going Concern 
The Directors have prepared the financial statements on a going concern basis, which contemplates continuity of normal 
business activities and the realisation of assets and the settlement of liabilities in the ordinary course of business. Based on 
anticipated levels of operational cash flow, the Group has sufficient cash to fund current operations for more than one year.
b.  Principles of Consolidation
Subsidiaries are all those entities over which the consolidated entity has control. The consolidated entity controls an entity 
when the consolidated entity is exposed to, or has rights to, variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has 
the ability to affect those returns through its power to direct the activities of the entity. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated 
from the date on which control is transferred to the consolidated entity. They are de-consolidated from the date that control 
ceases.
Intercompany transactions, balances and unrealised gains on transactions between entities in the consolidated entity are 
eliminated. Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of the impairment of the asset 
transferred. Accounting policies of subsidiaries have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the poli-
cies adopted by the consolidated entity.
The acquisition of subsidiaries is accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. A change in ownership inter-
est, without the loss of control, is accounted for as an equity transaction, where the difference between the consideration 
transferred and the book value of the share of the non-controlling interest acquired is recognised directly in equity attribut-
able to the parent.
Non-controlling interest in the results and equity of subsidiaries are shown separately in the statement of profit or loss and 
other comprehensive income, statement of financial position and statement of changes in equity of the consolidated entity. 
Losses incurred by the consolidated entity are attributed to the non-controlling interest in full, even if that results in a deficit 
balance.
Where the consolidated entity loses control over a subsidiary, it derecognises the assets including goodwill, liabilities and 
non-controlling interest in the subsidiary together with any cumulative translation differences recognised in equity. The con-
solidated entity recognises the fair value of the consideration received and the fair value of any investment retained together 
with any gain or loss in profit or loss.
c.  Segment Reporting
Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision 
maker. The chief operating decision makers, who are responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of 
the operating segments, is the Board of Directors.
d.  Revenue and Other Income Recognition
Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable and after taking into account any trade 
discounts and volume rebates allowed. Revenue from the sale of goods is recognised at the point of delivery as this cor-
responds to the transfer of significant risks and rewards of ownership of the goods and the cessation of all involvement in 
those goods.
Interest revenue is recognised using the effective interest rate method.
Royalties determined on a time basis are recognised on a straight line basis over the period of the agreement. Government 
grants are recognised in profit or loss on a systematic basis over the periods in which the Group recognises as expenses 
the related costs for which the grants are intended to compensate, but not before the receipt of the grant is relatively certain. 
38  Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
e.  Income Tax
The income tax expense (revenue) for the period is the tax payable on the current period’s taxable income based on the 
national income tax rate for each jurisdiction adjusted by changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities attributable to tem-
porary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the financial statements, 
and to unused tax losses. 
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the period when the asset is 
realised or the liability is settled and their measurement also reflects the manner in which management expects to recover 
or settle the carrying amount of the related asset or liability. 
Deferred tax assets relating to temporary differences and unused tax losses are recognised only to the extent that it is prob-
able that future taxable profit will be available against which the benefits of the deferred tax asset can be utilised.
Current tax assets and liabilities are offset where a legally enforceable right of set off exists and it is intended that net set-
tlement or simultaneous realisation and settlement of the respective asset and liability will occur. Deferred tax assets and 
liabilities are offset where: (a) a legally enforceable right of set off exists; and (b) the deferred tax assets and liabilities relate 
to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority on either the same taxable entity or different taxable entities where 
it is intended that net settlement or simultaneous realisation and settlement of the respective asset and liability will occur 
in future periods in which significant amounts of deferred tax assets or liabilities are expected to be recovered or settled.
f.  Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, deposits available on demand with banks, other short term highly liquid 
investments with original maturities of three months or less, and bank overdrafts. Bank overdrafts are reported within short 
term borrowings in current liabilities in the consolidated statement of financial position.
g.  Trade and Other Receivables
Receivables are recognised initially at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost, less provision for doubt-
ful debts. 
Collectability of receivables is reviewed on an ongoing basis. Debts which are known to be uncollectible are written off. A 
provision for doubtful receivables is established when there is objective evidence that the Group will not be able to collect 
all amounts due according to the original terms of receivables.
h.  Inventories
Inventories are measured at the lower of cost and net realisable value. The cost of manufactured products includes direct 
materials, direct labour and an appropriate portion of variable and fixed overheads. Overheads are applied on the basis of 
normal operating capacity. Costs are assigned on the basis of weighted average costs. Costs of purchased inventory are 
determined after deducting rebates and realisable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less 
the estimated costs of completion and the estimated cost necessary to make the sale. 
i.  Plant and Equipment
Plant and equipment are measured on the cost basis and therefore carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and any 
accumulated impairment. 
The cost of fixed assets constructed within the Group includes the cost of materials, direct labour, borrowing costs and an 
appropriate proportion of fixed and variable overheads. 
Subsequent costs are included in the asset’s carrying amount or recognised as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when 
it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Group and the cost of the item can be 
measured reliably. All other repairs and maintenance are charged to the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive 
income during the financial period in which they are incurred
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report  39
 
notes to the financial statements 
Continued
Depreciation
The depreciable amount of all fixed assets is depreciated on a straight line basis over the asset’s useful life to the Group 
commencing from the time the asset is held ready for use. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of 
either the unexpired period of the lease or the estimated useful lives of the improvements.
The depreciation rates used for each class of depreciable asset are :
Class of Fixed Asset 
Furniture and fittings 
Office equipment   
Depreciation Rate
20% 
6.7-33.33% 
The assets’ residual values and useful lives are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at the end of each reporting period. 
An asset’s carrying amount is written down immediately to its recoverable amount if the asset’s carrying amount is greater 
than its estimated recoverable amount. 
Gains and losses on disposals are determined by comparing proceeds with the carrying amount. These gains and losses 
are included in the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income. When revalued assets are sold, amounts 
included in the revaluation surplus relating to that asset are transferred to retained earnings.
j. 
Investments and Other Financial Assets
The Group classified its investments in the following categories: loans and receivables and available for sale financial assets.
The classification depends on the nature and purpose of the investment and is determined at the time of initial recognition.
(i)  Loans and receivables 
Loans and receivables are non derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in 
an active market and are subsequently measured at amortised cost. 
Loans and receivables are included in current assets, where they are expected to mature within 12 months after the 
end of the reporting period. 
Loan and receivables are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method, less any impairment. Interest 
income is recognised by applying the effective interest rate, except for short term receivables when the recognition of 
interest would be immaterial. 
k.  Intangibles other than Goodwill
Patents and trademarks 
Patents and trademarks are recognised at cost of acquisition. Patents and trademarks have a finite life and are carried at 
cost less any accumulated amortisation and any impairment losses. The Group has determined the useful life of the intan-
gible assets at 20 years. There is no amortisation charge to the intangible assets in the 2013 financial year.
Research and development 
Expenditure on research activities is recognised as an expense in the period in which is incurred. 
Expenditure on development projects (relating to the design and testing of new or improved products) are capitalised as 
intangible assets when it is probable that the project will be a success considering its commercial and technical feasibility 
and its costs can be measured reliably. The expenditure capitalised comprises all directly attributable costs, including costs 
of materials, services, direct labour and an appropriate proportion of overheads. Development expenditures that do not 
meet these criteria are recognised as an expense as incurred. Development costs previously recognised as an expense are 
not recognised as an asset in a subsequent period.
40  Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
l. 
Impairment of Assets
At the end of each reporting period, the Group assesses whether there is any indication that an asset may be impaired. 
The assessment will include the consideration of external and internal sources of information including dividends received 
from subsidiaries, associates or jointly controlled entities deemed to be out of pre acquisition profits. If such an indication 
exists, an impairment test is carried out on the asset by comparing the recoverable amount of the asset, being the higher 
of the asset’s fair value less costs to sell and value in use, to the asset’s carrying amount. Any excess of the asset’s carrying 
amount over its recoverable amount is recognised immediately in profit or loss, unless the asset is carried at a re-valued 
amount in accordance with another Standard (e.g. in accordance with the revaluation model in AASB 116). Any impairment 
loss of a re-valued asset is treated as a revaluation decrease in accordance with that other Standard. 
Where it is not possible to estimate the recoverable amount of an individual asset, the Group estimates the recoverable 
amount of the cash generating unit to which the asset belongs. 
Impairment testing is performed annually for goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives
m.  Trade and Other Payables
These amounts represent liabilities for goods and services provided to the Group prior to the end of financial year which are 
unpaid. The amounts are unsecured and are usually paid within 30 days of recognition. 
n.  Provisions
Provisions are recognised when the Group has a legal or constructive obligation, as a result of past events, for which it is 
probable that an outflow of economic benefits will result and that outflow can be reliably measured.
Provisions are measured using the best estimate of the amounts required to settle the obligation at the end of the reporting 
period. 
o.  Employee Benefits
Provision is made for the Company’s liability for employee benefits arising from services rendered by employees to the 
end of the reporting period. Employee benefits that are expected to be settled within one year have been measured at the 
amounts expected to be paid when the liability is settled. In determining the liability, consideration is given to employee 
wage increases and the probability that the employee may satisfy vesting requirements. 
Short term employee benefits
Liability for wages and salaries, including non monetary benefits, annual leave, long service leave and accumulating sick 
leave expected to be settled within 12 months of the reporting date are recognised in other payables in respect of employ-
ees’ services up to the reporting date and are measured at the amounts expected to be paid when the liabilities are settled. 
Other long term employee benefits
Liability for annual leave and long service leave is recognised in the provision for employee benefits and measured as the 
present value of expected future payments to be made in respect of services provided by employees up to the reporting 
date using the projected unit credit method. Consideration is given to expected future wage and salary levels, experience 
of employee departures and period of service. 
Retirement benefit obligations 
Contributions to the defined contribution fund are recognised as an expense as they become payable. Prepaid contribu-
tions are recognised as an asset to the extent that a cash refund or a reduction in the future payment is available. Contribu-
tions are paid into the fund nominated by the employee. 
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report  41
notes to the financial statements 
Continued
Share based payments 
The fair value of options granted is recognised as a benefit expense with a corresponding increase in equity. The fair value 
is measured at grant date and recognised over the period during which the directors and executives become uncondition-
ally entitled to the options. 
The fair value at grant date is determined using binomial option pricing model that takes into account the exercise price, 
the term of option, the impact of dilution, the share price at grant date and expected price volatility of the underlying share, 
the expected dividend yield and the risk free interest rate for the term of the option. 
The fair value of the options granted is adjusted to reflect market vesting conditions, but excludes the impact of any non- 
market vesting conditions. Non-market vesting conditions are included in assumptions about the number of options that 
are expected to become exercisable. The benefit expense recognised each period takes into account the most recent 
estimate. 
Upon the exercise of options, the balance of the share based payments reserve relating to those options is transferred to 
share capital and the proceeds received, net of any directly attributable transaction costs, are credited to share capital. 
p.  Equity settled compensation
The Group operates an employee share ownership plan. Share based payments to employees are measured at the fair 
value of the instruments issued and amortised over the vesting periods. Share based payments to non-employees are 
measured at the fair value of goods or services received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, if it is determined 
the fair value of the goods or services cannot be reliably measured, and are recorded at the date the goods or services are 
received. The corresponding amount is recorded to the option reserve. The fair value of options is determined using the 
binominal pricing model. The number of shares and options expected to vest is reviewed and adjusted at the end of each 
reporting period such that the amount recognised for services received as consideration for the equity instruments granted 
is based on the number of equity instruments that eventually vest. 
Upon the exercise of options, the balance of the share based payments reserve relating to those options is transferred to 
share capital and the proceeds received, net of any directly attributable transaction costs, are credited to share capital. 
q.  Functional and Presentation Currency
The functional currency of each of the Group’s entities is measured using the currency of the primary economic environ-
ment in which that entity operates. The consolidated financial statements are presented in Australian dollars which is the 
parent entity’s functional and presentation currency.
Foreign currency transactions 
Foreign currency transactions are translated into Australian dollars using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the 
transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation 
at financial year end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognised in 
profit or loss.
Foreign operations 
The assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated into Australian dollars using the exchange rates at the reporting 
date. The revenues and expenses of foreign operations are translated into Australian dollars using the average exchange 
rates, which approximate the rate at the date of the transaction, for the period. All resulting foreign exchange differences 
are recognised in other comprehensive income through the foreign currency reserve in equity. 
The foreign currency reserve is recognised in profit or loss when the foreign operation or net investment is disposed.
42  Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
r.  Goods and Services Tax (GST)
Revenue,  expenses  and  assets  are  recognised  net  of  the  amount  of  goods  and  services  tax  (GST),  except  where  the 
amount of GST incurred is not recoverable from the Australian Taxation Office (ATO).
Receivables and payable are stated inclusive of GST receivable or payable. The net amount of GST recoverable from, or 
payable to, the ATO is included with other receivables or payables in the consolidated statement of financial position.
Cash flows are presented on a gross basis. The GST components of cash flows arising from investing or financing activi-
ties which are recoverable from, or payable to, the ATO are presented as operating cash flows included in receipts from 
customers or payments to suppliers 
s.  Business Combinations
The acquisition method of accounting is used to account for business combinations regardless of whether equity instru-
ments or other assets are acquired. 
The consideration transferred is the sum of the acquisition date fair values of the assets transferred, equity instruments 
issued or liabilities incurred by the acquirer to former owners of the acquiree and the amount of any non-controlling inter-
est in the acquiree. For each business combination, the non-controlling interest in the acquiree is measured at either fair 
value or at the proportionate share of the acquiree’s identifiable net assets. All acquisition costs are expensed as incurred 
to profit or loss. 
On the acquisition of a business, the Group assesses the financial assets acquired and liabilities assumed for appropriate 
classification and designation in accordance with the contractual terms, economic conditions, the Group’s operating or 
accounting policies and other pertinent conditions in existence at the acquisition date. 
Where  the  business  combination  is  achieved  in  stages,  the  Group  remeasures  its  previously  held  equity  interest  in  the 
acquiree at the acquisition date fair value and the difference between the fair value and the previous carrying amount is 
recognised in profit or loss. 
Contingent consideration to be transferred by the acquirer is  recognised at the acquisition date fair value.  Subsequent 
changes in the fair value of contingent consideration classified as an asset or liability is recognised in profit or loss. Con-
tingent consideration classified as equity is not remeasured and its subsequent settlement is accounted for within equity. 
The difference between the acquisition date fair value of assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any non-controlling inter-
est in the acquiree and the fair value of the consideration transferred and the fair value of any pre-existing investment in 
the acquiree is recognised as goodwill. If the consideration transferred and the pre-existing fair value is less than the fair 
value of the identifiable net assets acquired, being a bargain purchase to the acquirer, the difference is recognised as a 
gain directly in profit or loss by the acquirer on the acquisition date, but only after a reassessment of the identification and 
measurement of the net assets acquired, the non-controlling interest in the acquiree, if any, the consideration transferred 
and the acquirer’s previously held equity interest in the acquirer. 
Business combinations are initially accounted for on a provisional basis. The acquirer retrospectively adjusts the provisional 
amounts  recognised  and  also  recognises  additional  assets  or  liabilities  during  the  measurement  period,  based  on  new 
information obtained about the facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date. The measurement period ends 
on either the earlier of (i) 12 months from the date of the acquisition or (ii) when the acquirer receives all the information 
possible to determine fair value.
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report  43
notes to the financial statements 
Continued
t.  Earnings per share
Basic earnings per share 
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the profit attributable to owners of Cellmid Limited, excluding any costs 
of servicing equity other than ordinary shares, by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the 
financial year, adjusted for bonus elements in ordinary shares issued during the financial year.
Diluted earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share adjusts the figures used in the determination of basic earnings per share to take into account 
the after income tax effect of interest and other financing costs associated with dilutive potential ordinary shares and the 
weighted  average  number  of  shares  assumed  to  have  been  issued  for  no  consideration  in  relation  to  dilutive  potential 
ordinary shares.
u.  Comparative Figures
When required by Accounting Standards, comparative figures have been adjusted to conform to changes in presentation 
for the current financial year. 
Where the group has retrospectively applied an accounting policy, made a retrospective restatement of items in the financial 
statements or reclassified items in its financial statements, an additional statement of financial position as at the beginning 
of the earliest comparative period will be disclosed.
v.  New Accounting Standards for Application in Future Periods
Australian Accounting Standards and Interpretations that have recently been issued or amended but are not yet
mandatory, have not been early adopted by the consolidated entity for the annual reporting period ended 30 June 2014. 
The consolidated entity’s assessment of the impact of these new or amended Accounting Standards and Interpretations, 
most relevant to the consolidated entity, are set out below.
-  AASB 2 Share-Based Payment
This standard and its consequential amendments are applicable to annual reporting periods for which Share-based 
payment transactions for grant dates on or after 1 July 2014. There will be no impact on these financial statements 
when these amendments are first adopted as they apply prospectively to share-based payment transactions for which 
the grant date is on or after 1 July 2014.
-  AASB 8 Operating Segments
This standard and its consequential amendments are applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 
July 2014. There will be no impact on the financial statements when these amendments are first adopted because 
this is a disclosure standard only. Further, because the Group does not currently aggregate operating segments in 
determining reportable segments, it is unlikely that any additional disclosures will be required when this amendment is 
adopted for the first time for the year ended 30 June 2015.
-  AASB 124 Related Party Disclosures
This standard and its consequential amendments are applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 
July 2014. The amendment clarifies that an entity that provides key management personnel services (‘management 
entity’) to a reporting entity (or to the parent of the reporting entity), is a related party of the reporting entity. The amend-
ment also requires separate disclosure of amounts recognised as an expense for key management personnel services 
provided by a separate management entity (but not in the categories set out in AASB 124.17) There will be no impact 
on these financial statements when these amendments are first adopted because this is a disclosure standard only. As 
the group does not currently engage the services of a management entity, it is also unlikely that any additional disclo-
sures will be required when this amendment is adopted for the first time for the year ended 30 June 2015.
44  Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
 
-  AASB 9 Financial Instruments and its consequential amendments
This standard and its consequential amendments are applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1
January 2017 and completes phases I and III of the IASB’s project to replace IAS 39 (AASB 139) ‘Financial Instru-
ments:  Recognition  and  Measurement’.  This  standard  introduces  new  classification  and  measurement  models  for 
financial assets, using a single approach to determine whether a financial asset is measured at amortised cost or fair 
value. The accounting for financial liabilities continues to be classified and measured in accordance with AASB 139, 
with one exception, being that the portion of a change of fair value relating to the entity’s own credit risk is to be pre-
sented in other comprehensive income unless it would create an accounting mismatch. Chapter 6 ‘Hedge Accounting’ 
supersedes the general hedge accounting requirements in AASB 139 and provides a new simpler approach to hedge 
accounting that is intended to more closely align with risk management activities undertaken by entities when hedging 
financial and non-financial risks. The consolidated entity will adopt this standard and the amendments from 1 July 2017 
but the impact of its adoption is yet to be assessed by the consolidated entity.
-  AASB 2013-3 Amendments to AASB 136 - Recoverable Amount Disclosures for Non-Financial Assets
These amendments are applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2014. The disclosure
requirements of AASB 136 ‘Impairment of Assets’ have been enhanced to require additional information about the fair
value measurement when the recoverable amount of impaired assets is based on fair value less costs of disposals.
Additionally, if measured using a present value technique, the discount rate is required to be disclosed. The adoption 
of these amendments from 1 July 2014 may increase the disclosures by the consolidated entity.
Annual Improvements to IFRSs 2010-2012 Cycle
These amendments are applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 July 2014 and affects several
Accounting Standards as follows: Amends the definition of ‘vesting conditions’ and ‘market condition’ and adds defini-
tions for ‘performance condition’ and ‘service condition’ in AASB 2 ‘Share-based Payment’; Amends AASB 3 ‘Business 
Combinations’ to clarify that contingent consideration that is classified as an asset or liability shall be measured at fair value 
at each reporting date; Amends AASB 8 ‘Operating Segments’ to require entities to disclose the judgements made by 
management in applying the aggregation criteria; Clarifies that AASB 8 only requires a reconciliation of the total reportable 
segments assets to the entity’s assets, if the segment assets are reported regularly; Clarifies that the issuance of AASB 
13 ‘Fair Value Measurement’ and the amending of AASB 139 ‘Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement’ and 
AASB 9 ‘Financial Instruments’ did not remove the ability to measure short-term receivables and payables with no stated 
interest rate at their invoice amount, if the effect of discounting is immaterial; Clarifies that in AASB 116 ‘Property, Plant 
and Equipment’ and AASB 138 ‘Intangible Assets’, when an asset is revalued the gross carrying amount is adjusted in a 
manner that is consistent with the revaluation of the carrying amount (i.e. proportional restatement of accumulated amor-
tisation); and Amends AASB 124 ‘Related Party Disclosures’ to clarify that an entity providing key management personnel 
services to the reporting entity or to the parent of the reporting entity is a ‘related party’ of the reporting entity. The adoption 
of these amendments from 1 July 2014 will not have a material impact on the consolidated entity.
Annual Improvements to IFRSs 2011-2013 Cycle
These amendments are applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 July 2014 and affects four
Accounting Standards as follows: Clarifies the ‘meaning of effective IFRSs’ in AASB 1 ‘First-time Adoption of Australian
Accounting Standards’; Clarifies that AASB 3 ‘Business Combination’ excludes from its scope the accounting for the
formation of a joint arrangement in the financial statements of the joint arrangement itself; Clarifies that the scope of the
portfolio exemption in AASB 13 ‘Fair Value Measurement’ includes all contracts accounted for within the scope of AASB 
139 ‘Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement’ or AASB 9 ‘Financial Instruments’, regardless of whether they 
meet the definitions of financial assets or financial liabilities as defined in AASB 132 ‘Financial Instruments: Presentation’; 
and Clarifies that determining whether a specific transaction meets the definition of both a business combination as defined 
in AASB 3 ‘Business Combinations’ and investment property as defined in AASB 140 ‘Investment Property’ requires the 
separate application of both standards independently of each other. The adoption of these amendments from 1 July 2014 
will not have a material impact on the consolidated entity.
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report  45
notes to the financial statements 
Continued
w.  Critical accounting estimates and judgements
Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including 
expectations of future events that may have a financial impact on the entity and that are believed to be reasonable under 
the circumstances.
The preparation of the financial statements requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that 
affect the reported amounts in the financial statements. Management continually evaluates its judgements and estimates in 
relation to assets, liabilities, contingent liabilities, revenue and expenses. Management bases its judgements, estimates and 
assumptions on historical experience and on other various factors, including expectations of future events, management 
believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. The resulting accounting judgements and estimates will seldom equal 
the related actual results. The judgements, estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of causing a material 
adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities (refer to the respective notes) within the next financial year are 
discussed below. 
Estimated impairment of intellectual property 
The Group tests annually whether intellectual property has suffered any impairment, in accordance with the accounting 
policy stated in note 1. The recoverable amounts of the intellectual property have been determined based on reviewing the 
status of the research and development program, progress on its patent applications and projected cash flow calculations. 
These calculations require the use of assumptions, including estimating timing of cash flows, product development and 
availability of resources to exploit the assets.
x.  Correction of prior period error
The  acquisition of the remaining non-controlling interest in Advangen International Pty Limited as discussed  in note  19 
occurred on 25th November 2013. This transaction was incorrectly recorded and disclosed in the Interim Financial Report 
for the period ended 31 December 2013. The transaction has been retrospectively adjusted in the financial records of the 
Group. 
The impact of the adjustment to correct the error is noted in the below table:
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
Goodwill
EQUITY
Acquisition reserve
As stated in 31 
December 2013 
interim report
Adjustment
Restated per 
30 June 2014 
report
$
$
154,796
(154,796)
$
-
-
(154,796)
(154,796)
As the transaction occurred during the period 31 December 2013, no adjustment is necessary to the comparative balances 
stated in the 30 June 2014 financial report. 
46  Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
 
 
NOTE 2: PARENT INFORMATION
The following information has been extracted from the books and records of the parent, Cellmid Limited and Controlled 
Entities and has been prepared in accordance with Accounting Standards.
The financial information for the parent entity, Cellmid Limited and Controlled Entities has been prepared on the same basis 
as the consolidated financial statements except as disclosed below.
Investments in subsidiaries
Investments in subsidiaries are accounted for at cost in the financial statements of the parent entity. Dividends received 
from associates are recognised in the parent entity profit or loss, rather than being deducted from the carrying amount of 
these investments.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
ASSETS
Current assets
Non-current assets
TOTAL ASSETS
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
TOTAL LIABILITIES
EQUITY
Contributed equity
Accumulated losses
Share based payment reserve
TOTAL EQUITY
STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Loss of the parent entity
Total comprehensive income
2014
$
2013
$
4,813,472
3,047,883
7,861,355
2,500,986
3,777,714
6,278,700
(579,055)
(61,262)
(640,317)
480,084
52,508
532,592
27,401,832
25,336,522
(21,982,582)
(21,317,677)
1,801,788
7,221,038
1,727,263
5,746,108
664,905
664,905
1,173,677
1,173,677
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report  47
 
notes to the financial statements 
Continued
NOTE 3: REVENUE AND OTHER INCOME
Consolidated Group
2014
$
2013
$
1,150,931
541,649
52,054
1,009,188
26,220
36,494
1,123,956
2,274,887
91,542
429,519
521,061
30,833
358
24,000
406
55,597
597,246
115,167
48,875
164,042
Consolidated Group
2014
$
2013
$
(333,085)
(2,511)
(82,138)
(28,926)
(179,986)
(112,140)
(722,882)
(84,606)
(1,124)
(71,879)
13,338
(95,842)
(16,634)
(475,361)
Revenue from continuing operations 
Sales revenue:
– sale of goods
Other revenue:
– interest received
– licence fees and royalties
– rental revenue
– other revenue
Total Revenue
Other income:
– Government grants
– Gain on disposal of financial asset
Total other income
NOTE 4: LOSS FOR THE YEAR
Loss  before  income  tax  from  continuing  operations  includes  the  following 
specific expenses:
Cost of sales
Finance costs
Defined contribution superannuation expenses
(Loss)/Gain on foreign exchange
Minimum lease payments
Depreciation and amortisation expense
Research and development expenses
48  Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
NOTE 5: INCOME TAx  
a. The major components of income tax benefit comprise:
– Income tax benefit
Consolidated Group
2014
$
2013
$
747,106
747,106
785,866
785,866
b. Numerical reconciliation of income tax benefit to accounting loss:
Loss for year before income tax benefit
(2,227,942)
(2,327,173)
Prima facie tax benefit on loss from ordinary activities before income tax at 
31.11% (30.0% in 2013)1
Add / (less) tax effect of:
– Share based payment
– Sundry items
– Research and development expenditure
– Research and development core technology expenditure
(692,936)
(698,152)
40,057
32,445
669,972
(190,438)
1,210
6,406
396,695
(190,438)
Tax losses not brought to account
147,826
484,279
Adjusted income tax expense
(6,926)
-
Less: research and development tax benefit for the financial year2
754,032
785,866
Income tax benefit
747,106
785,866
1. 
The Group operates across two tax jurisdictions being Australia and Japan each with difference corporate tax 
rates. The applied tax rate of 31.11% represents the average tax rate applicable to the Group for the financial 
year ended 30 June 2014.
2.  A $754,032 ($785,866 in 2013) research and development tax offset was received for a claim in accordance 
with the Commonwealth Government’s Research and Development Tax Incentive.
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report  49
 
 
 
 
notes to the financial statements 
Continued
(c) Unused tax losses
Movements in unused tax losses
Carried forward unused tax losses at the beginning of the  
financial year
Current unused tax losses for which no deferred tax asset 
 has been recognised
Tax losses applied to net taxable income for the period
Prior period differences between tax calculation and income  
tax return
Carried forward unused tax losses at the end of the 
 financial year
Notional tax rate
Potential future tax benefit
This income tax benefit arising from tax losses will only be realised if: 
Australia
$
Japan 
$
Total 
$
13,467,581
1,566,188
15,033,769
-
435,350
435,350
(47,754)
(416,139)
-
-
(47,754)
(416,139)
13,003,688
2,001,538
15,005,226
30.00%
3,901,106
35.64%
713,348
4,614,454
i. 
ii. 
iii. 
the Group derives future assessable income of a nature and of an amount sufficient to enable the Group to ben-
efit from the deductions for the losses to be realised;
 the Group continues to comply with the conditions for deductibility imposed by tax legislation; and
 no changes in tax legislation adversely affect the Group in realising the benefit from the deductions for the 
losses.
50  Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
 
NOTE 6: BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
On 24 May 2013 Cellmid Limited acquired 100% of the ordinary share shares of Advangen Incorporated (Japanese enti-
ty) for the total consideration transferred of JPY ¥285,171,564. This has been translated to AUD $2,893,968 using the 
exchange rate per the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) on 24 May 2013. 
The following table shows the assets acquired, liabilities assumed and the purchase consideration at the acquisition date.
Book value
Fair value
Exchange rate
Fair value
¥JPY
¥JPY
41,182,636
41,182,636
19,594,272
19,594,272
31,742,886
31,742,886
2,850,035
2,850,035
848,292
848,292
-
198,099,144
(9,145,701)
(9,145,701)
87,072,420
285,171,564
98.54
98.54
98.54
98.54
98.54
98.54
98.54
-
-
-
285,171,564
Assets or liabilities acquired:
Cash 
Trade receivables 
Inventories 
Other assets 
Plant and equipment 
Intangible assets 
Trade payables 
Net identifiable assets acquired
Goodwill 
Acquisition date fair value of the total 
consideration transferred 
Representing:
- Cash
- Fair value of issued shares
Cash used to acquire business, net of cash acquired:
Cash to acquire subsidiary
Less: cash and cash equivalents on acquisition
Net cash used
$AU
417,928
198,846
322,132
28,923
8,609
2,010,342
(92,812)
2,893,968
-
2,893,968
1,221,839
1,672,129
2,893,968
1,221,839
417,928
803,911
The contribution to profit or loss and other income of Advangen Incorporated for the year can be found in Note 25. 
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report  51
notes to the financial statements 
Continued
NOTE 7: INTERESTS OF KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL (KMP)
a. Directors and key management personnel 
The following persons were directors or key management personnel of Cellmid Limited during the financial year: 
David King (Chairman) - appointed from 18 January 2008 to current
Ms Maria Halasz (Chief Executive Officer) - appointed from 19 November 2007 to current
Mr Graeme Kaufman (Non executive) - appointed from 27 August 2012 to current
Mr Martin Rogers (Non executive) - appointed from 19 September 2012 to current
Mr Nicholas Falzon (Secretary and Financial Controller) - appointed from 6 October 2010 to current
b. Directors and key management personnel compensation 
Refer to the remuneration Report contained in the Directors’ Report for details of the remuneration paid or payable to each 
member of the Group’s key management personnel for the year ended 30 June 2014. 
The totals of remuneration paid to KMP of the Company and the Group during the year are as follows:
Short term employment benefits
Post employment benefits
Share-based payments
NOTE 8: AUDITOR’S REMUNERATION
2014
$
582,804
37,197
52,047
672,048
2013
$
536,887
44,915
-
581,802
During the year the following fees were paid or payable for services provided by the auditor of the parent entity, its related 
practices and a non-related audit firm:
Auditing or review of the financial statements
- BDO East Coast Partnership -Australia
- BDO Toyo & Co - Japan
52,500
10,479
62,979
54,900
10,200
65,100
52  Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
 
NOTE 9: EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic and diluted earnings per share (in cents)
2014
$
(0.21)
2013
$
(0.27)
a. Reconciliation of earnings to profit or loss from continuing operations
Loss for the year
(1,473,815)
(1,541,307)
b. Weighted average number of shares used as the denominator
Weighted average number of ordinary shares used in calculating dilutive EPS
696,596,038
563,832,659
No.
No.
Options
315,656,738  options  granted  to  executives  and  directors  (2013:  354,105,173)  are  considered  to  be  potential  ordinary 
shares and have been included in the determination of diluted earnings per share to the extent to which they are dilutive. In 
the year ended 30 June 2014, these options were in fact anti-dilutive, and consequently diluted earnings per share is the 
same as basic earnings per share. The options have not been included in the determination of basic earnings per share. 
Details relating to options are set out in Note 18.
NOTE 10: CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash at bank and in hand
Short term bank deposits
2,495,778
1,754,994
5,975
-
2,501,753
1,754,994
The effective interest rate on short term bank deposits was 3.5-4.5% ( 2013: 3.5-4.5%); these deposits were all on call.
Reconciliation of cash 
Cash and Cash equivalents reported in the consolidated statement of cash flows are reconciled to the equivalent items in 
the consolidated statement of financial position as follows:
Cash and cash equivalents
2,501,753
1,754,994
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report  53
 
notes to the financial statements 
Continued
NOTE 11: TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES
CURRENT
Trade receivables
Other receivables
Effective interest rates and credit risk
2014
$
177,787
42,684
220,471
2013
$
41,123
214,572
255,695
The Group has no significant concentration of credit risk with respect to any single counterparty or group of counterparties 
other than those receivables specifically provided for and mentioned within Note 23(a). The class of assets described as 
‘trade and other receivables” is considered to be the main source of credit risk related to the group. 
There is no interest rate risk for the balances of trade and other receivables. There is no material credit risk associated with 
other receivables. No receivables are past due or impaired. 
2014
$
2013
$
1,019,368
643,009
46,988
1,022,708
672,218
-
1,709,365
1,694,926
362,806
(319,537)
43,269
366,065
(314,432)
51,633
NOTE 12: INVENTORIES
CURRENT
Midkine
Finished goods
Raw materials
NOTE 13: PLANT & EQUIPMENT
PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
At cost
Accumulated depreciation
54  Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
 
 
 
a. Movements in carrying amounts of plant and equipment 
Balance at 1 July 2013
Additions
Depreciation
Balance at 30 June 2014
Balance at 1 July 2012
Additions through business combinations
Additions
Depreciation expense
Balance at 30 June 2013
NOTE 14: INTANGIBLE ASSETS
PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS
At cost
Accumulated amortisation
a. Movements in carrying amounts of intangible assets 
Balance at 1 July 2013
Additions
- Amortisation
Foreign exchange movements
Balance at 30 June 2014
Balance at 1 July 2012
Additions
Foreign exchange movements
Balance at 30 June 2013
Plant and  
Equipment
$
51,633
3,259
(11,623)
43,269
32,276
8,609
27,382
(16,634)
51,633
Total
$
51,633
3,259
(11,623)
43,269
32,276
8,609
27,382
(16,634)
51,633
2014
$
2013
$
2,011,782
(100,517)
1,911,265
2,163,150
-
2,163,150
Patents &  
Trademarks
$
Total
$
2,163,150
2,163,150
-
(100,517)
(151,368)
-
(100,517)
(152,808)
1,911,265
1,909,825
1,440
1,440
2,010,342
2,010,342
151,368
151,368
2,163,150
2,163,150
Intangible assets, other than goodwill, have finite useful lives. The Group has determined the useful life of the intangible 
asset at 20 years. There is no amortisation charge to the intangible assets in the 2013 financial year. 
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report  55
 
notes to the financial statements 
Continued
2014
$
2013
$
68,302
73,321
293,378
1,340
268,465
563,183
271,936
-
229,363
501,299
Employee Benefits
Annual Leave
Long Service 
Leave
$
134,755
31,449
166,254
2014
$
166,254
61,262
227,516
$
52,508
8,754
61,262
2013
$
134,755
52,508
187,263
NOTE 15: OTHER ASSETS
CURRENT
Prepayments
NOTE 16: TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES
CURRENT
Trade payables
GST payable
Other payables
NOTE 17: PROVISIONS 
Balance at 1 July 2013
Additional provisions
Provision for employee benefits
Analysis of total provisions
Current
Non-current
Provision for employee benefits
56  Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
NOTE 18: CONTRIBUTED EQUITY
735,585,702 (2013: 650,470,079) Ordinary shares
315,656,738 (2013: 354,105,173) Options
2014
$
2013
$
26,769,571
24,704,261
632,261
632,261
27,401,832
25,336,522
a. Ordinary shares
At the beginning of the year
Shares issued - July 2012
Shares issued - March 2013
Shares issued - May 2013
Escrowed shares - November 20131
Shares issued - November 20132
Shares issued - December 2013
Shares issued - December 2013
Shares issued - February 2014
Shares issue costs, net of tax
At the end of the year
Issue price
$
2014
No.
2013
No.
2014
No.
2013
No.
650,470,079
520,843,117
24,704,261
20,741,843
0.0165
0.0400
0.0400
0.0300
0.0340
0.0300
0.0150
0.0400
-
-
-
24,242,424
49,646,914
55,737,624
12,000,000
3,515,625
66,666,666
2,333,332
600,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
119,531
2,000,000
35,000
24,000
400,000
1,985,877
1,672,129
-
-
-
-
-
(113,221)
(97,588)
735,585,702
650,470,079
26,769,571
24,704,261
1.   12,000,000 shares were issued to Maria Halasz on 25 November 2013 under a limited recourse loan arrange-
ment. The shares were held in escrow and unpaid at 30 June 2014 (2013: nil). All other shares are fully paid. 
2.   On 25 November 2013, Cellmid Limited acquired the remaining 5% interest in its subsidiary, Advangen Inter-
national Pty Ltd, from Direct Capital Group Pty Limited (a controlled entity of Maria Halasz) and related party of 
Cellmid Limited. Consideration of 3,515,625 shares in Cellmid Limited, with a market value of $119,531 was 
provided for the acquisition. The carrying value of the non-controlling interest as at the date of acquisition was 
a net liability position $35,265. Therefore the transaction resulted in an adjustment to the acquisition reserve of 
$154,796. Refer to Note 22: Related Party Transactions.
The holders of ordinary shares are entitled to participate in dividends and the proceeds on winding up of the Company. On 
a show of hands at meetings of the Company, each holder of ordinary shares has one vote in person or by proxy, and upon 
a poll each share is entitled to one vote.
The Company does not have authorised capital or par value in respect of its shares.
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report  57
 
 
notes to the financial statements 
Continued
b. Options 
(i)  For information relating to the Cellmid Limited and controlled entities employee option plan, including details of 
options issued, exercised and lapsed during the financial year and the options outstanding at year end, refer to 
Note 28 Share based payments.
(ii)  For information relating to share options issued to key management personnel during the financial year, refer to 
the remuneration report.
At the beginning of the year
Options issued - August 2013
Options issued - October 2013
Options issued - November 2013
Options issued - December 2013
Options issued - March 2014
Options issued - April 2014
Options lapsed - April 2014
Options lapsed - July 2013
Options lapsed - March 2014
Options lapsed - April 2014
At the end of the year
(c) Capital Risk Management 
2014
No.
2013
No.
354,105,173
36,923,968
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(3,000,000)
(27,198,435)
(8,250,000)
1,440,000
262,542,770
3,000,000
25,000,000
26,573,435
625,000
(2,000,000)
-
-
-
315,656,738
354,105,173
The Group’s objectives when managing capital are to safeguard its ability to continue as a going concern, so that it can 
provide returns for shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders and to maintain an optimum capital structure to reduce 
the cost of capital. 
In order to maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Group may adjust the amount of dividends paid to shareholders, 
return capital to shareholders, issue new shares or sell assets to reduce debt. 
The Group look to raise capital when an opportunity to invest in a business or company is seen as value adding relative to 
the current parent entity’s share price at the time of the investment. The Group is not actively pursuing additional invest-
ments in the short term as it continues to integrate and grow its existing businesses in order to maximise synergies.
58  Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
 
 
NOTE 19: RESERVES
Share based payment reserve
Balance the beginning of the year
Share based payment expense
2014
$
2013
$
1,727,263
1,723,230
74,524
4,033
Balance at the end of the year
1,801,787
1,727,263
Acquisition reserve
Balance the beginning of the year
Acquisition of non-controlling interests in Advangen International Pty Ltd
Balance at the end of the year
General reserve
Balance the beginning of the year
Net movement as a result of shares issued to minority interest
Balance at the end of the year
Foreign exchange reserve
Balance the beginning of the year
Foreign exchange movements
Balance at the end of the year
Total reserves
a. Foreign currency translation reserve 
-
(154,796)
(154,796)
22,855
-
22,855
216,257
(180,898)
35,359
-
-
-
22,855
-
22,855
-
216,257
216,257
1,705,205
1,966,375
Exchange differences arising on translation of the foreign controlled entity are recognised in other comprehensive income 
foreign currency translation reserve. The cumulative amount is reclassified to profit or loss when the net investment is 
disposed.
b. General reserve 
The general reserve records funds set aside for future expansion of the Group.
c. Share based payments reserve 
This reserve records the cumulative value of employee services received for the issue of share options. When the option is 
exercised the amount in the share option reserve is transferred to share capital.
d. Acquisition reserve 
On 25 November 2013, Cellmid Limited acquired the remaining 5% interest in its subsidiary, Advangen International Pty 
Ltd, from Direct Capital Group Pty Limited (a controlled entity of Maria Halasz) and related party of Cellmid Limited. Con-
sideration of 3,515,625 shares in Cellmid Limited, with a market value of $119,531 was provided for the acquisition. The 
carrying value of the non-controlling interest as at the date of acquisition was a net liability position $35,265. Therefore the 
transaction resulted in an adjustment to the acquisition reserve of $154,796. Refer to Note 22: Related Party Transactions.
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report  59
 
 
notes to the financial statements 
Continued
NOTE 20: CASH FLOW INFORMATION
a. Reconciliation of Cash Flow from Operations with Loss after Income Tax 
Loss for the year
Non cash flows in loss:
- depreciation and amortisation
- licence revenue
- share base payment
- bad and doubtful debt
- gain on sale of financial asset
- foreign exchange loss
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of the effects of purchase of subsidiaries:
- (increase)/decrease in trade and other receivables
- (increase)/decrease in prepayments
- (increase)/decrease in inventories
- increase/(decrease) in trade and other payables
- increase/(decrease) in provisions
Cash flow from operations
2014
$
2013
$
(1,480,836)
(1,541,307)
112,140
(570,741)
133,523
-
(429,519)
(132,313)
35,224
5,019
(14,439)
61,884
40,253
16,634
-
4,033
1,227
(48,875)
-
22,890
(11,583)
(59,303)
146,453
17,063
(2,239,805)
(1,452,768)
NOTE 21: EVENTS AFTER THE REPORTING PERIOD
No matters or circumstances have arisen since the end of the financial year which significantly affected or could significantly 
affect the operations of the Group, the results of those operations, or the state of affairs of the Group in future financial years.
NOTE 22: RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
a. The Group’s main related parties are as follows: 
Parent entities:
Cellmid Limited is the ultimate parent entity.
Subsidiaries: 
For details of disclosures relating to subsidiaries, refer to Note 24: Interests in Subsidiaries. Transactions and balances 
between subsidiaries and the parent have been eliminated on consolidation of the group.
Key management Personnel:
For details of disclosures relating to key management personnel, refer to Note 7: Interests of Key Management Personnel 
(KMP) and the remuneration report within the Directors’, report.
b. Transactions with related parties 
On the 25 November 2013, Cellmid Limited acquired the remaining 5% interest in its subsidiary, Advangen International Pty 
Ltd, from Direct Capital Group Pty Limited a controlled entity of Maria Halasz, a Director of the company. Consideration of 
3,515,625 Cellmid Limited shares, with a market value of $119,531 was provided for the acquisition. 
There were no other related party transactions during the year ended 30 June 2014. 
60  Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
NOTE 23: FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT
The Group’s activities expose it to a number of financial risks as described below. The Group’s overall risk management 
program seeks to minimise potential adverse effects on the financial performance of the Group. To date, the group has not 
had the need to utilise derivative financial instruments such as foreign exchange contracts or interest rate swaps to manage 
any risk exposures identified. 
The totals for each category of financial instruments, measured in accordance with AASB 139 as detailed in the accounting 
policies to these financial statements, are as follows:
Financial Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other receivables
Total financial assets
Financial Liabilities
Financial liabilities at amortised cost
Trade and other payables
Note
10
11
2014
$
2013
$
2,501,753
220,471
1,754,994
255,695
2,722,224
2,010,689
16
563,183
501,299
Total financial liabilities
563,183
501,299
The fair value of financial assets and liabilities equate to the carrying value.
a. Credit risk 
Credit risk is managed on a Group basis. The group has no significant concentration of credit risk.
The maximum exposure to credit risk by class of recognised financial assets at the end of the reporting period is equivalent 
to the carrying value and classification of those financial assets (net of any provisions) as presented in the table above.
Trade and other receivables that are neither past due nor impaired are considered to be of high credit quality.
Credit risk related to balances with banks and other financial institutions is managed by management in accordance with 
approved board policy. Such policy requires that surplus funds are only invested with counterparties with a Standard & 
Poor’s rating of at least AA .
b. Liquidity risk 
The Group manages this risk through the following mechanisms: 
— preparing forward looking cash flow analysis in relation to its operational, investing and financing activities; 
— managing credit risk related to financial assets; and
— only investing surplus cash with major financial institutions.
The Group is not exposed to any material liquidity risk.
Financial liabilities consist only of trade and other payables for which the contractual maturity dates are within 6 months of 
the reporting date. 
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report  61
 
 
notes to the financial statements 
Continued
c. Market risk
Foreign exchange risk
Exposure to foreign exchange risk may result in the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument fluctuating due 
to movement in foreign exchange rates of currencies in which the Group holds financial instruments which are other than 
the AUD functional currency of the Group. 
The maximum exposure to foreign exchange risk is the fluctuation in the US dollar on its USD and JPY denominated bank 
accounts and also the profit and net assets of the Japanese subsidiary, Advangen Incorporated.
The Company has performed a sensitivity analysis relating to its exposure to foreign currency risk at the end of the finan-
cial year. The sensitivity analysis demonstrates the effect on the current year results and equity which could result from 
a change in this risk. At the end of the financial year, the effect on profit and equity as a result of changes in the foreign 
exchange rate with all other variables remaining constant would be as follows:
Year ended 30 June 2014
+/- 1% in foreign exchange rates
Year ended 30 June 2013
+/- 1% in foreign exchange rates
Interest rate risk
Profit
$
Equity
$
+/- 2,707
-/+ 938
+/- 739
+/- 9,110
The Group’s main interest rate risk arises from deposits with banks and other financial institutions. Deposits made at vari-
able rates expose the Group to interest rate risk. Management maintains approximately 100% of deposits with banks at 
call on variable interest rates.
The Company has performed a sensitivity analysis relating to its exposure to interest rate risk at the end of the financial year. 
The sensitivity analysis demonstrates the effect on the current year results and equity which could result from a change 
in this risk. At the end of the financial year, the effect on profit and equity as a result of changes in the interest rate with all 
other variables remaining constant would be as follows:
Year ended 30 June 2014
+/- 1% in interest rates
Year ended 30 June 2013
+/- 1% in interest rates
Price risk
The Group is not exposed to any material price risk. 
Profit
$
Equity
$ 
+/- 25,018
+/- 25,018
+/- 17,550
+/- 17,550
62  Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
NOTE 24: INTERESTS IN SUBSIDIARIES
The consolidated financial statements incorporate the assets, liabilities and results of the following wholly-owned subsidiar-
ies in accordance with the accounting policy described in Note 1:
Name
Subsidiaries of Cellmid Limited:
Advangen International Pty Limited1
Advangen Limited
Advangen Incorporated
Country of  
Incorporation
Australia
Australia
Japan
Percentage  
Owned (%)
2014
Percentage  
Owned (%)
2013
100
100
100
95
100
100
1.   On 25 November 2013, Cellmid Limited acquired the remaining 5% interest in its subsidiary, Advangen Inter-
national Pty Ltd, from Direct Capital Group Pty Limited (a controlled entity of Maria Halasz) and related party of 
Cellmid Limited. Refer to Note 22: Related Party Transactions.
NOTE 25: SEGMENT INFORMATION
Identification of reporting segments 
The Group is organised into two operating segments: (1) research and development of diagnostics and therapeutics and 
(2) research, development and marketing of hair growth products. These operating segments are based on the internal 
reports that are reviewed and used by the Board of Directors (identified as the Chief Operating Decision Makers (CODM)) 
in assessing performance and in determining the allocation of resources. There is no aggregation of operating segments. 
The CODM reviews both adjusted earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (segment result) and profit 
before income tax.
Types of products and services 
The principal products and services of each of these operating segments are as follows:
Research of Diagnostics and Therapeutics (Biotechnology)
- research and development, marketing and promotional activities;
- diagnostics and therapeutics for cancer and inflammatory conditions; and
Research, development and marketing of hair growth products (Retailing)
- hair growth products.
Geographical segment information
The primary geographic segment within which the Group operates is Australia as at 30 June 2014. For primary reporting 
purposes, the Group operates in two geographic segment as described as at 30 June 2014.
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report  63
notes to the financial statements 
Continued
Major customers
During the year ended 30 June 2014 approximately 49% of the Group’s external revenue was derived from sales to Frost-
bland Pty Ltd (4%) through the retailing segment, and Pacific Edge Biotechnology Limited (25%) and Fujikura Kasei Co 
Limited (20%) through the biotechnology segments.
Biotechnology 
Australia
Retailing Australia
Retailing Japan
Total
2014
$
2013
$
2014
$
2013
$
2014
$
2013
$
2014
$
2013
$
64,300
64,300
52,014
1,009,188
26,220
19,900
215,279
271,257
311,098
815,374
15,272
1,150,931
541,649
215,279
271,257
311,098
815,374
15,272
1,150,931
541,649
30,833
358
24,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
40
-
-
-
10,988
398
5,596
-
-
-
8
52,054
30,833
1,009,188
26,220
36,494
358
24,000
406
1,171,622
270,470
282,255
311,496
821,010
15,280
2,274,887
712,413
Revenue
Sales of products
Total sales revenue
Interest received
Royalties
Rental revenue
Other revenue
Total Revenue
Other income
Government grant received
91,542
115,167
Gain on disposal of financial assets
429,519
48,875
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
91,542
115,167
429,519
48,875
Expenses
(2,917,117)
(2,374,994)
(606,005)
(576,661)
(1,252,594)
(115,015)
(4,775,716)
(3,066,670)
Share - based compensation
(133,523)
(4,032)
Depreciation and amortisation
Finance costs
(7,562)
(2,501)
(13,919)
(1,110)
-
(271)
(10)
-
-
-
(133,523)
(4,032)
(156)
(104,307)
(2,560)
(112,140)
(16,635)
(14)
-
-
(2,511)
(1,124)
Loss before income tax
(1,368,020)
(1,959,543)
(324,031)
(265,335)
(535,891)
(102,296)
(2,227,942)
(2,327,173)
Income tax benefit
Loss after income tax benefit
Assets
Segment assets
Total assets
Liabilities
Segment liabilities
Total liabilities
747,106
785,866
(1,480,836)
(1,541,307)
3,621,544
2,545,805
368,379
369,363
2,464,502
3,078,551
6,454,425
5,993,719
6,454,425
5,993,719
(640,317)
(532,592)
(87,287)
(79,483)
(63,095)
(76,487)
(790,699)
(688,562)
(790,699)
(688,562)
NOTE 26: COMMITMENTS
Lease commitments - operating 
Committed at the reporting date but not recognised as liabilities, payable:
Within one year
One to five years
Minimum lease payments
2014
$
157,069
490,655
647,724
2013
$
174,039
554,061
728,100
Operating lease commitments includes contracted amounts for office space under non-cancellable operating lease expir-
ing within five years with no option to extend.
64  Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
 
NOTE 27: CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND CONTINGENT ASSETS
The Company and Group had no contingent liabilities or contingent assets at 30 June 2014 (nil at 30 June 2013). 
NOTE 28: SHARE BASED PAYMENTS
At 30 June 2014 the Group has the following share based payment schemes:
(i) The Cellmid Limited and Controlled Entities Employee Incentive Plan is designed as an incentive for eligible 
employees of the Group. Under the plan, participants are granted options which only vest if certain conditions 
are met.
A summary of the Company options granted under the plan is as follows:
Expiry Date
23/10/2016
3/07/2013
19/03/2014
1/06/2014
1/07/2014
20/11/2014
20/11/2014
19/02/2015
15/11/2015
15/11/2016
15/06/2017
14/08/2017
Exercise 
price
Balance at start  
of the year
Granted
Exercised 
0.034 
0.057 
0.050 
0.050 
0.050 
0.056 
0.035 
0.062 
0.100 
0.030 
0.032 
0.034 
 290,542,770 
 3,000,000 
 27,198,435 
 8,250,000 
 5,002,006 
 7,000,000 
 2,000,000 
 600,000 
 100,000 
 3,971,962 
 5,000,000 
 1,440,000 
354,105,173
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Forfeited/ 
expired 
Balance at the 
end of the year
 - 
 290,542,770 
(3,000,000) 
(27,198,435) 
(8,250,000) 
 - 
 - 
 - 
 - 
 - 
 - 
 - 
 - 
 - 
 - 
 - 
 5,002,006 
 7,000,000 
 2,000,000 
 600,000 
 100,000 
 3,971,962 
 5,000,000 
 1,440,000 
(38,448,435)
315,656,738
The weighted average share price during the financial year was $0.030 ($0.022 in 2013). The weighted average remaining 
contractual life of the options outstanding at the end of the financial year was 2.24 years (1.96 years in 2013). 
For options granted in the current year financial year, the valuation model inputs used to determine the fair value at the 
grant date were as follows:
Grant Date
Expiry Date
Share price 
at grant date
Exercise 
price
Expected 
volatility
Dividend 
yield
Risk-free 
interest rate
Fair value at 
grant date
25/11/2013
25/11/2016
0.030
0.030
95.58%
0%
3.08%
0.0183
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report  65
 
notes to the financial statements 
Continued
NOTE 29: COMPANY DETAILS
The registered office of the Company is:
Suite 1802, Level 18 
15 Castlereagh Street
Sydney NSW 2000
Australia
The principal places of business are: 
Cellmid Limited
Suite 1802, Level 18
15 Castlereagh Street
Sydney NSW 2000
Australia
Advangen International Pty Limited 
Suite 1802, Level 18
15 Castlereagh Street
Sydney NSW 2000
Australia
Advangen Incorporated
Chiba Industry Advancement Centre
Tokatsu Techno Plaza 
5 4 6 Kashiwanoha 
Kashiwa
Chiba 277-0082 Japan
66  Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
 
 
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report  67
68  Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
Directors’ 
Declaration
DIRECTORS’ DECLARATION
In the directors’ opinion:
• 
• 
• 
• 
the attached financial statements and notes thereto comply with the Corporations Act 2001, the Accounting Standards, 
the Corporations Regulations 2001 and other mandatory professional reporting requirements;
the attached financial statements and notes thereto comply with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued 
by the International Accounting Standards Board as described in note 1 to the financial statements;
the attached financial statements and notes thereto give a true and fair view of the Group’s financial position as at 30 
June 2014 and of its performance for the financial year ended on that date;
there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due 
and payable; and
•  at the date of this declaration, there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company and the Group will be able to 
pay its debts as and when they become due and payable.
The directors have been given the declarations required by section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001.
Signed in accordance with a resolution of the Board of Directors made pursuant to Section 295 (5) of the Corporations 
Act 2001.
Dr David King
Director
Dated this 29th day of August 2014
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report  69
70  Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report  71
 72 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
Additional  
information
The information in this section has been prepared as at 31 August 2014.
20 LARGEST SHAREHOLDERS 
Holder Name 
CELL SIGNALS INC
SEISTEND (SUPER) PTY LTD  
Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above