Cellmid Limited
Annual Report 2014

Plain-text annual report

Cellmid Limited Suite 1802, Level 18, 15 Castlereagh Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia ABN 69 111 304 119 T: +61 2 9221 6830 F: +61 2 9221 8535 E: info@cellmid.com.au W: www.cellmid.com.au 2014 Annual Report C E L L M I D L I M I T E D 2 0 1 4 A N N U A L R E P O R T Contents Chairman’s Letter CEO’s Report Directors’ Report Corporate Governance Statement Annual Financial Report Additional Information Corporate Directory 4 5 11 25 29 73 76 Cellmid Limited (ASX:CDY) Annual Report ABN 69 111 304 119 Suite 1802, Level 18 15 Castlereagh Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia T: +61 2 9221 6830 F: +61 2 9221 8535 E: info@cellmid.com.au W: www.cellmid.com.au Chairman’s Letter Dear Shareholder I am pleased to present to you the 2014 Annual Report for Cellmid Limited. During the 2014 financial year the Company has made strong advances, with important milestones achieved in all areas of the business. The record revenue of $2.8 million and continued increase in net asset backing clearly demonstrates that our business strategy is working. Our focus remains on building a balanced pharmaceutical product development business with both sustainable revenues and scale-changing upside potential; we believe that achieving this will ultimately be positively reflected in the Company’s share price. Progress with our therapeutic programs has been rapid and exciting during the reporting period. In May Cellmid announced the successful humanisa- tion and pre-clinical testing of its lead anti-cancer antibody, CAB102, which has since entered the clinical develop- ment phase. Manufacturing is underway and the planning for necessary toxicity testing and ethics approvals to conduct a first-in-human safety study continues. Assuming smooth progress through these steps CAB102 is expected to be administered to cancer patients in 2015. This clinical trial will herald a watershed moment for the Company, and for our midkine therapeutics in general, since it will be the first time midkine has ever been targeted by any drug. A safe outcome in this study would add signifi- cant value not only to CAB102, but also to Cellmid’s other therapeutic programs. Pleasing progress also continues to be made in our diagnostic portfolio. The Cxbladder® test developed by our licen- see Pacific Edge has been released for sale in the US, Australia and New Zealand, with Spain soon to be added 4 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report to the list. Royalties are expected to begin during the 2015 financial year from these markets. Quest (Celera) continued to report good progress with their lung cancer diagnostic program, and clinical validation of their test is well advanced. Meanwhile, Japanese company Fujikura continues their devel- opment of a pathology lab-friendly midkine assay. In addition, the Company has entered into new research collabora- tions during the past year, and we aim to translate these efforts into further licensing opportunities in the future. Clinical and scientific interest in midkine continues to grow internationally to Cellmid’s benefit given the extensive patent protection that the Company holds across all facets of the target. The Company is well placed to share in any commercial successes flowing from midkine research. In February the prominence of midkine as a disease target was greatly boosted when the prestigious and influential British Journal of Pharmacology dedicated an entire Special Themed Issue to midkine biology. In April we co-hosted our Third Midkine Symposium, on this occasion in Kyoto, Japan, where the midkine story first started. Once again this meeting attracted a world-class line-up of speakers and delegates from research institutes and universities from around the world. Our invited scientists shared with us many exciting developments around midkine, spanning a wide range of disease indications. Our key assets are our patents, and the portfolio around midkine continues to grow and mature; newly granted patents during the year included a grant from the UK Patent Office for the use of midkine for hair growth, in addition to a USA patent for surgical adhesion. Cellmid remains the global leader in midkine intellectual property with a portfolio of 87 patents across 21 patent families. In parallel to the diligent advances in our midkine business, Cellmid’s wholly owned consumer health subsidiary, Advangen, continued with growing sales and new patent filings. Since acquiring the Japanese parent company (Advan- gen Inc.) in May 2013, the Company has dramatically expanded the upcom- ing product offerings, accessed new markets and opened up new sales channels in existing territories. In Japan, a distribution agreement was signed in late 2013 allowing for new product launch in October 2014. We have signed our first distribution agree- ment in China and business develop- ment efforts in other major markets including the USA, Europe and South America are well advanced. Meanwhile, the Advangen scientific team has discovered and patented novel botanical extracts that inhibit FGF5 with even greater efficiency than the current active ingredients. These extracts will form the basis of our next generation hair growth products. The 2014 financial year placed us well on the way to estab- lishing the Company as a global leader in scientifically and clinically validated hair growth technology representing part of the scale-changing upside potential to which I referred earlier. Further details of all these positive developments can be found in the report of our CEO, Maria Halasz. Our achievements during the year would not have been possible without the excep- tional commitment and professionalism of our small team of staff and consultants, capably led by our CEO Maria Halasz. On behalf of shareholders I express our thanks for their commendable perform- ance. Finally I take this opportunity to thank all shareholders for their continued support and encouragement. Dr David King Chairman of the Board Cellmid Limited CEO’s Report Dear Shareholder, I am delighted to report to you on this 2014 financial year. Reflecting on an exceptionally productive year, with a 267% increase in revenue to $2.8 million and significant develop- ments in our midkine antibody (MK antibody) program, Cellmid has been going from strength to strength during the period. The Company has grown substantially in 2014 in its operations, assets and revenues. Sales in our consumer health business reached $1.15 million, up 112% from 2013 ($541,649). Our license related income reached $1.4 million. Although this was mostly due to one off licensing fees we expect regular royalties in 2015. The value of our tangible assets has increased, as have our intangibles. In a major therapeutic milestone two of our murine anti-midkine antibodies showed efficacy in in vivo cancer models in October 2013 opening the door for clinical development. Since then, we have successfully completed humanisation and lead selection of our first drug candidate and commenced manufacturing. Three years ago we set out with a strategy to build up revenues, while maintaining the momentum for significant value inflec- tion from our therapeutic program. It’s worthwhile to reflect on the journey since then. Some of the Company’s achieve- ments in that time are easily quantified in financial measures and summarised in Table 1 below. In addition to the 1532% revenue growth over three years Cellmid has shown contin- ued investment in research and development while manag- ing to cut losses 28% along the way. Critically, the Company improved its income/expenditure ratio covering 65% of all outgoings through sales and licensing revenues in 2014. Cellmid has been progressively reducing its reliance on issuing new shares for working capital during the past three years. Underlying asset values have increased by the prudent deploy- ment of capital into high value research and development programs. Although the Company raised a modest amount of money from the market in December 2013 ($2 million) through a private placement, this did not result in dilution and we have increased our net tangible asset backing during the 2014 financial year to 0.51 cents per share. In addition to generating revenues the Company has contin- ued to diligently manage costs and invest shareholders’ funds wisely. This strategy was already showing results in 2013, but the 2014 financial year has produced metrics that are outstanding endorsements of the Company’s efforts. MK antibody program is primed to enter the clinic in 2015 After delivering compelling results in diabetic nephropathy in 2013 Cellmid’s MK antibodies have subsequently shown efficacy and clear mechanism of action in pre-clinical models of cancer. During the period the Company completed several xenograft studies using its lead MK antibodies and observed promising results. The MK antibody treatment slowed primary tumour growth, reduced cancer spread (metastasis) and slowed the forma- tion of new blood vessels (angiogenesis) in different tumour types. These findings completed the Company’s exten- sive early studies to determine clinical direction for its MK antibodies. After assessment of the data from all previous pre-clinical efficacy studies, including the strong efficacy from our diabetic nephropathy studies in 2013 and reviewing commercial and intellectual property issues, the Company has made a decision to enter the clinic in multiple cancer indications. Cellmid is in a very fortunate position as its MK antibodies show potential in several disease indications, allowing for broad future exploita- tion of the Company’s intellectual property. Table 1: Results 2012-2014 Total revenue Loss after income tax R&D spending Current assets Loss per share Net tangible asset backing per share Income/Expenditure ratio 2012 $171,273 $1,972,483 $1,636,711 $2,441,636 0.46 0.48 6% 2013 $761,288 $1,541,307 $1,746,369 $3,778,936 0.27 0.48 25% 2014 $2,795,948 $1,480,836 $2,100,000 $4,499,891 0.21 0.51 65% % change 2012-2014 up 1532% down 25% up 28% up 84% down 54% up 6% Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 5 CEO’s Report Continued Critical in any successful drug development is the selec- tion of the lead drug, in this case the best performing MK antibody, which then can enter a clinical development program. Having a large number of candidates has been fortunate as it allowed the Company for ‘back-ups’ in case the original drug failed to be manufacturable or wasn’t showing the expected performance. It has also made the selection of the lead more difficult as more than one of the Company’s MK-antibodies have performed above the threshold for selection. For this reason it was especially exciting that, as a leap in advancing towards clinical trials, we reported in May 2014 the completion of humanisation, testing, and selection of our lead MK antibody for our planned ‘first in class’ clinical trials. The lead antibody, designated CAB102, significantly reduced chemotherapy resistance in a pre-clinical treatment model of refractory lung cancer. Importantly, initial cell expression and stability data confirmed that CAB102 is manufacturable and stable, making it a feasible commercial drug product. Selection of CAB102 was the result of a pre-clinical program in which dozens of Cellmid’s proprietary and patent- protected murine MK antibodies were assessed for efficacy and mechanism of action both in vivo and in vitro. Eventu- ally, the two most promising murine antibodies identified by this process were humanised by Cellmid’s collaborators, Biotecnol SA. Of the 78 humanised antibody variants generated by Biotecnol SA, the six most promising candidates were then assessed further for mechanism of action, in vivo anti-tumour efficacy, and manufacturability. Manufacturability was assessed by cell line expression and level of aggregate formation in a feasibility run. Specificity for MK has been retained, with no evidence of binding to other proteins. A preliminary assessment showed all six candidates were secreted at commercially viable concen- trations during cell culture, all six candidates were readily purified and have been confirmed as structurally stable and aggregate free. The six MK antibody candidates were then tested for functional activity in vitro and in vivo using a tumour xenograft model in combination with carboplatin. Carboplatin was selected as the chemotherapy of choice as it is standard therapy in lung cancer. The cancer xenograft studies were performed in the widely studied K-Ras mutant, highly refrac- tory and difficult to treat human non-small cell lung carci- noma (NSCLC) cell line NCI-H460. 6 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report As expected, and consistent with clinical experience, carbo- platin did not significantly reduce tumour volume or mass when used alone compared to untreated controls in the NCI-H460 model. However, three of the six MK antibody candidates significantly reduced tumour growth when combined with carboplatin. CAB102 has shown the great- est efficacy reducing mean tumour volumes at 21 days post treatment by 50%. This was an exciting result providing a strong commercial rationale for the MK antibody program in multiple cancer types. Concurrently to the humanisation and lead selection, Cellmid actively assessed potential manufacturers. After an extensive tendering process the Company selected Rodon Biologics, a subsidiary of Biotecnol SA, to manufacture CAB102. Under the agreement, Rodon will be responsible to engineer a high yielding CHO cell line expressing CAB102, along with the processes necessary to manufacture and formulate the drug for first in human trials. One of the key considerations in choosing Rodon was that it has already produced the humanised candidates for initial screening and tested CAB102’s manufacturability and stabil- ity in small-scale production runs as part of the humanisa- tion. The Company has collaborated closely with the Rodon team during these work programs establishing a solid working relationship. Further cementing a strong collaboration was the agreement signed with Biotecnol Ltd, another Biotecnol group company, for the development of midkine (MK) TribodiesTM. MK Tribod- ies™ are antibodies targeting MK in addition to other oncogenic proteins. Biotecnol is one of the pioneers of multi- specific antibody engineering with a validated and proprietary technology platform. The agreement allows for the parties to exchange ideas freely; Biotecnol is responsible for the development and validation of the novel MK TribodiesTM and Cellmid is expected to conduct pre-clinical efficacy studies. The parties will share further development costs equally and will jointly own the new multi- specific drugs. The collaboration agreement is expected to result in one or more novel and proprietary MK TribodiesTM. Although early stage and potentially high risk, the collabo- ration is also a low cost entry for the Company in the hotly contested multi-specific antibody space. As our lead antibody CAB102 is entering clinical develop- ment, and a potential pipeline of products is on the horizon. Cellmid’s MK antibody program is entering a truly exciting and company changing period. Cxbladder® is one of the success stories for MK as an oncology biomarker MK has continued as the subject of several cancer diagnostic studies and results confirmed that it is indeed an important early tumour marker. Cellmid completed its two year healthy volun- teer study (CK3000) in December 2013 not only confirming ‘normal’ MK levels but finding outliers that presented healthy and normal in all other biomarkers. On further examination these subjects, with elevated MK levels, in fact had underlying medical conditions expected with their respective MK levels. In a strong start to the financial year Cellmid received confirma- tion in July 2013 that Fujikura Kasei Co Ltd (Fujikura) intended to exercise its option to licence the MK diagnostic technology. With the exercising of the option Fujikura paid the requisite JPY40 million ($440,000) milestone fee, contributing to the $1.4 million total licensing revenue for the financial year. The license agreement, currently in negotiations, is expected to grant exclusive rights to Fujikura to use Cellmid’s proprietary antibodies for latex based tests in Japan. In return, Fujikura will pay royalties on products sold. Product development and marketing costs will be borne by Fujikura. Although Cellmid has a highly accurate MK-ELISA already, a latex based assay is expected to suit commercial products better, as it is widely used and accepted in pathology labora- tories. It is also preferred as it can easily be automated, reduc- ing processing costs. A latex based test with a 500 picogram/ml accuracy is well suited to identify individuals with elevated midkine levels. This in turn is expected to lead to the development of a number of cancer diagnostic products. Cellmid will support Fujikura’s regulatory and product development programs with its MK diagnostic expertise during the period of the license. Having Fujikura, one of the largest suppliers of latex particles for the medical diagnostics industry in Japan, as licensee is important in carving out a market for Cellmid’s MK diagnostic products. Cellmid’s existing licensees, Quest (Celera) and Pacific Edge, have also achieved significant milestones in their product development and commercialisation programs, which resulted in the payment of another milestone fee of $800,000 when Cxbladder® was launched in the USA. Cxbladder® sales commenced in the USA Bladder cancer is one of the most common forms of malignan- cies. In the United States around one million patients present annually with haematuria; of these, 68,000 are diagnosed with bladder cancer. Once treated, patients will have regular cystoscopies, painful urethra endoscopies, to monitor reoccurrence. Pacific Edge’s Cxbladder® has the potential to replace cystoscopy over time as a preferred method of patient monitoring tool. Cxbladder®, with MK as one of the important biomarkers, has shown outstanding performance in clinical studies to date, with 100% sensitivity and 85% specificity in late stage bladder cancer. This specificity is expected to increase when using it in a monitoring setting. The test can also be used to differentiate between high and low grade cancers. In their 2014 Annual Report Pacific Edge Chairman, Chris Swann, reiterated their earlier projections of $100 million sales after five full years of trading. Cellmid will receive single digit royal- ties on net sales. Quest (Celera) Lung Cancer License Cellmid signed a license agreement with Quest (Celera) in October 2009 enabling Quest (Celera) to include MK as one of the biomarkers in a lung cancer diagnostic test. The license covers using MK for the early diagnosis, prognosis, disease monitoring and management of lung cancer. The terms of the agreement provide for a milestone payment at the time of regulatory clearance for the lung cancer test, and royalties to be paid semi-annually. In June 2014 Cellmid received an annual update on the progress made in the development of the Quest (Celera) lung cancer test. In their letter of update Quest (Celera) stressed that during the reporting period it continued to work diligently towards the launch of a lung cancer diagnostic test which includes MK. They asserted their belief that they have achieved major advances during the period, in particular with the clinical studies performed. Since 2009 Quest (Celera) has been developing a blood test to replace biopsy for determining whether pulmonary nodules identified through computer tomography or chest X-rays are cancerous. Quest (Celera) confirmed last year that validation of the six-marker blood test was completed on the commer- cial Luminex® diagnostic platform. They also reported in 2013 that they had signed an agreement with the NCI to participate in the chest X-Ray screening Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Trial (PLCO) as part of their clinical validation program. Cellmid signed a license agreement with Pacific Edge Limited in 2010 for the use of MK as one of the biomark- ers in their bladder cancer test (Cxbladder®). Pacific Edge has achieved solid progress since the license was signed and has commenced sales using its CLIA registered Pennsylvania labs. Quest (Celera) has noted that there is growing support for a lung cancer screening program in the USA with recommenda- tion from the US Preventative Screening Task Force (Decem- ber 2013). Their estimate for the target market of the test is 7 million people annually, who are at high risk for lung cancer. 1 Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment, CLIA, sets standards and issues certificates for clinical laboratory testing in the United States. It is administered by the US Centre for Medicare and Medical Devices, CMS Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 7 CEO’s Report Continued This is an important period for Quest (Celera) to advance to regulatory filings of its test as its exclusivity for the use of MK for lung cancer diagnosis expires in on 31 October 2014. Whilst they may continue to use MK after that date, Cellmid will have the option to license MK to others for lung cancer diagnosis under the terms of the license agreement. Huana Likang Biotechnology Cellmid has found a partner with strong growth potential and a dedicated sales force for its FGF5 inhibitor brands. Costs associated with marketing and sales will be met solely by the distributor, however Cellmid will provide assistance by supplying its marketing information and materials and product designs. Consumer health division delivered 112% revenue increase in 2014 and growing It was only in late 2012 that our consumer health division became visible with the launch of our first Australian product, evolis®. Since then, acquiring Advangen Inc. (Japan) resulted in a transformative 2014 financial year. Advangen became an international business with operations in Australia and Japan, but with market potential far beyond these countries. Embedding the acquisition during 2014 was challenging and meant harmonising accounting systems, renegotiating employment, supplier and manufacturing contracts, resetting distribution agreements and focusing on the redevelopment and branding of the full Advangen product range. At the end of the first merged financial year I am pleased to report that we have completed several of these key operational, product, manufacturing, distribution and sales targets. There is excitement in this sector particularly as demand for performance driven hair care is growing rapidly. Within the $80 billion annual global market for hair care by far the most upside is expected from anti-aging products. These are products that can improve the quality, thickness and growth rate of hair. While most products are either polymers or proteins that can improve hair quality temporarily, there is a dearth of bioactive hair care that affects the actual hair follicle making it stronger and healthier. With our efficacious FGF5 inhibitors Cellmid has the opportunity to become a leader in this market. By far the fastest growing geographical region for anti-aging hair care is China. When Cellmid acquired Advangen Inc., the Company became the owner of Chinese import permits for the Japnese produced Jo-Ju® and Lexilis Black® brands of lotions and shampoo. On 29 January 2014 Cellmid signed (via its wholly owned subsidiary Advangen Inc. (Japan)) a Chinese distribution agreement for its Lexilis Black™ and Jo-Ju™ brands with Beijing Huana Likang Biotechnology Co Ltd. The distribution agreement is exclusive for these brands in China subject to minimum performance requirements. The agreement is for a period of three years, however it may be automatically extended if minimum sales are met. There has been intense interest in Cellmid’s FGF5 inhibitor hair growth products from various market segments following the acquisition of Advangen Inc. (Japan). In selecting Beijing 8 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report Ordinarily, companies importing healthcare and cosmetic goods to China face significant hurdles; often it takes several years before sales permits are issued. This is increasingly the case as Chinese authorities are keen to enforce even stricter conditions on imports. Whilst not formally acknowledged on the Company’s balance sheets, it is likely that the value of Cellmid’s import permits to China have increased significantly since acquisition. In last year’s Annual Report we stated that “our objective is to establish ourselves as a global leader in scientifically and clinically validated hair growth technology building a substan- tial business, which provides cash flow and adds significant shareholder value”. With a 112% increase in revenue, new patent filings, expanding the distribution to China, signing new distribution agreements in Japan and opening discussions in other markets we are well on our way to achieving it. Patent Portfolio Update Cellmid holds the most significant intellectual property assets related to MK worldwide. Cellmid’s patent portfolio currently includes 87 patents in 21 patent families, which cover the use of MK and anti-MK agents for therapeutic purposes in a number of diseases, as well as the use of MK as a diagnostic marker in cancer and other disorders. During the period our patent portfolio continued to grow with new filings and grants. In a tremendous commercial outcome on 8 October 2014 Cellmid reported that the European Patent Office has granted its patent entitled “Antibody recognising C-domain of midkine”. The granted claims provide broad coverage as they relate to antibodies and antibody fragments which bind to the important functional C-domain of growth factor MK. The patent also grants composition of matter claims for MK-specific antibodies, including Cellmid’s lead anti-cancer antibody. This is a key patent in Cellmid’s portfolio and gives the Company clear, exclusive rights to develop MK antibodies (including CAB102) unencumbered by competition. Moreo- ver, Cellmid’s patent coverage for its therapeutic antibodies now extends across cancer, inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, multiple sclerosis and surgical adhesion. In a further boost to the Company’s MK antibody patent portfo- lio the Japanese Patent Office (JPO) granted patent applica- tion JP 2007-544236 “Method for Treatment or Prevention of Diseases Associated with a Functional Disorder of Regulatory T Cells” on 18 October 2013. It is a member of a key patent family in Cellmid’s antibody patent portfolio and it adds yet another layer of intellectual property protection to Cellmid’s MK antibody program. JP 2007-544236 covers the use of MK antibodies to increase the number of regulatory T cells (Tregs). Tregs are central controllers of autoimmune responses; when Treg numbers are too low, the body’s immune system can attack its own tissues, leaving subjects vulnerable to autoimmune diseases. Increas- ing the Treg numbers can mitigate such autoimmune attack. This family was granted last year in the USA with similar claims allowed. The patents in this family expire in 2027. In another development on the intellectual property front the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) granted Cellmid’s patent application 13/539,247 entitled “Preventa- tive for Adhesion Following Abdominal Surgery”. This patent protects the use of midkine (MK)-specific DNA and RNA antisense molecules that disrupt MK expression and prevent the formation of surgical adhesions. This patent complements the already granted US patent 10/547,011 entitled ‘Agents for Preventing Post-Laparotomy Adhesions’, which covers the use of MK antibodies and broadens the platform of the Company’s anti-midkine agents. Other patents in this family have already been granted in Japan and are under examination in Europe. The surgical adhesion patents make up one of the five key families which provide the company’s dominant intellectual property position over the treatment of inflammatory diseases by targeting MK. Midkine a scientifically important target for many diseases It is not often that one can report that a major scientific journal dedicated their entire review edition to a single company’s technology. Yet this is exactly what happened in February 2014 when the British Journal of Pharmacology (BJP) published a special edition dedicated to MK including 16 research papers by various authors. The BJP is the premier peer-reviewed publication of the British Pharmacological Society, and it is recognised as one of the most influential international journals covering all aspects of experimental pharmacology. Being featured in a high-impact, internationally regarded journal with a global audience is a significant validation of MK’s importance in health and disease. Cellmid recognised this potential early on, and it is pleasing to see the increas- ing and ever wider realisation of MK’s potential utility as a disease target or as a therapeutic agent in its own right. Having MK reviewed in this way is also very helpful to Cellmid’s product development programs. The publications provide strong supporting evidence to regulators, key opinion leaders and potential biotech and pharma partners. Further validating MK’s importance as a disease target was the largest attendance yet by scientists from eleven countries at the Third Midkine Symposium in Kyoto in April 2014. The Symposium, co-hosted by Emeritus Professor Takashi Muramatsu and Professor Kenji Kadomatsu, built on the success of the first two MK meetings held in Sydney in 2010 and Istanbul in 2012 and delivered significant advances on our understanding of MK biology and function. During the Symposium it was reported that serum-stable, drug-like MK manufacture has been achieved at large scale for clinical use by one of the company’s commercial partners and new insights were presented into MK’s molecular struc- ture and its functional implications. Further understanding of the receptors and signalling pathways engaged by MK in cancer and other diseases have been illustrated in in vitro and in vivo studies by several scientists directly relevantly to Cellmid’s own MK antibody studies in cancer. Perhaps most stunningly, the precise mechanism of action by which MK promotes inflammatory cell infiltration into tissues was presented during the Symposium giving clear insights into how anti-MK treatments might disrupt this process. This has been a truly exceptional year with strong financial and operational performance in all of the Company’s businesses. We are beginning to see the reaction from the market but the real value created is yet to be built into the Company’s share price. We are determined to continue on this path and pursue increased shareholder value on all fronts. This progress would not be possible without the unwavering support from our Chairman, Dr David King, and the Board. I would like to thank them and the dedicated Cellmid team for their contribution in achieving these substantial milestones this financial year. I would also like to thank our shareholders for their support. Issue contains invited reviews The BJP Midkine from pre-eminent MK researchers from around the world, with comprehensive up-to-date articles covering the gamut of MK biology. Publications examine the role of MK in diseases includ- ing various cancers, kidney diseases, cardiovascular disease, multiple sclerosis and neurodegenerative disorders. New understanding of MK signalling and receptors is also featured. Maria Halasz CEO and Managing Director Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 9 Directors’ Report 11 24 25 29 Contents Directors’ Report Auditor’s Independence Declaration Corporate Governance Statement Annual Financial Report The directors present their report, together with the financial statements of the Group, being Cellmid Limited (“the Company”) and its Controlled Entities, for the financial year ended 30 June 2014. Principal activities and significant changes in nature of activities The principal activities of the Group during the financial year were: • The development and commercialisation of diagnostic and therapeutic products for the management of diseases such as cancer and various chronic inflammatory conditions by targeting midkine (Midkine Business); and • the development and sale of over the counter (OTC) treatments to alleviate excessive and abnormal hair loss and re- establish the natural hair growth cycle (Consumer Health Business) There were no significant changes in the nature of the Group’s principal activities during the financial year. Operating results and review of operations for the year Operating results The consolidated loss of the Group was down 3.9% to $1,480,836, after providing for income tax ($1,541,307 in 2013). Revenue from product sales was up by more than 112% to $1,150,931 ($541,649 in 2013), while total revenue and other income was up by more than 267% to $2,795,948 for the year ($761,288 in 2013). REviEw Of OpERAtiOns The Group closed its first full year of operations for the Consumer Health Business following the acquisition of Advangen Inc. The Japanese distribution was expanded and new contracts have been signed with existing partners. In Australia, sales to hair salons commenced during the reporting period. Further development milestones have been achieved in the Group’s Midkine Business with the completion of humanisa- tion and lead antibody (CAB102) selection and the commencement of manufacturing for clinical trials. The Group has commenced preparations for its ’First-in-human’ clinical studies with reviewing clinical sites and negotiating with principal investigators. The Group’s diagnostic business has delivered solid revenue during the reporting period from milestone and option to license fees. Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 11 Directors’ Report Continued i. Consumer Health Business – Distribution continues to grow for the Group’s FGF5 inhibitor hair growth products The Consumer Health Business was set up to commercialise over the counter hair growth products based on the FGF5 inhibition technology developed by Advangen Inc. (Japan). With the acquisition of Advangen Inc. (Japan) in May 2013 the Group has taken control of global rights for the technology and closed the first full year of operations for the joint business. In Japan the Group signed a major distribution agreement with Natural Garden, a direct marketing company, for the supply of existing brands and newly developed products. The salon distribution has also been expanded for the male lotion and shampoo brands (Lexilis Black®). Test marketing of the Group’s new female brand of lotions and shampoos, Jo-Ju Red® commenced in Japan. In Australia the roll out of the products in hair salons commenced in New South Wales in March 2014 with strong results. Recruitment of sales people will continue in other states over the coming months. The Group has not invested in market- ing into pharmacies during the period, which meant that new doors have been opened but sell through has slowed down. The Advangen Inc. acquisition delivered Chinese import permits for the Lexilis® and Jo-Ju® brands, with the potential to accelerate geographical expansion of the distribution. The Group has been able to take advantage of these valuable assets and signed a distribution agreement with Beijing Huana Likang, a marketing company with primary channels in television shopping networks and online sales. The Group has been successful in the fractionation and synthesis of novel FGF5 inhibitors and filed new composition of matter patent applications during the period. New formulations have been prepared using these discoveries and a safety study has been initiated in humans. The new formulations have also given impetus to a product strategy and technology review, which was commenced in June 2014. ii. Midkine Business Advances in therapeutic product development – lead antibody in manufacturing for clinical studies Under this program the Group has been developing its anti-midkine antibody drugs in several indications and, on the basis of data generated from its pre-clinical efficacy studies, elected to proceed to ’First-in-human’ clinical studies in oncology. During the reporting period the Group has achieved significant milestones on its path to the clinic. Proof of concept studies have shown that the Group’s antibody drug is effective in cancer when assessed in a pre-clinical model of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The Group successfully humanised its antibodies and selected a lead drug candidate (CAB102) to progress to clinical studies. Importantly, manufacturability of CAB102 has been confirmed and the Group has appointed its manufacturing partner. This program received significant boost during the reporting with the granting of major patents. The European Patent Office granted one of the Group’s most important midkine antibody patent applications, “Antibody Recognising C domain of midkine”, which has oncology claims. Another antibody patent entitled “Method for the treatment or prevention of diseases associated with a functional disorder of T Cells” was granted by the Japanese Patent Office in October 2013. iii. Midkine (MK) Diagnostic Program The Group’s licensees, Pacific Edge Limited and Celera Quest, continued to make significant progress towards commer- cialisation of their respective products during the reporting period. Fujikura Kasei has exercised its option to license the Group’s antibodies for diagnostic purposes in Japan. A new diagnostic collaboration was signed with Abcodia Limited during the reporting period for the assessment of midkine in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer, and internal diagnostic programs have continued. iv. Pacific Edge Limited launched Cxbladder® in the USA with midkine as one of the biomarkers The Group signed a license agreement with Pacific Edge Limited in 2010 for the use of the Group’s midkine protein as one of the biomarkers in Cxbladder®, a bladder cancer diagnostic test. According to the terms of the license Pacific Edge paid an upfront fee and was to pay a milestone fee in shares on reaching first sale of the product outside of Australia and New Zealand. Pacific Edge launched its Cxbladder® test in the USA in March 2013 and signed up a number of US health-care 12 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report providers, making their first commercial sale in July 2013. This event triggered the last milestone payment to the Group which was received on 1 August 2014. v. Celera Quest license update The Group signed a license agreement with Celera Quest in October 2009 for the use of midkine in their lung cancer diagnostic test. The Group received an upfront payment at the time of signing, and a milestone payment will become payable by Celera Quest at the time of regulatory clearance and royalties on sales. During the reporting period Celera Quest continued to work towards the launch of a lung cancer diagnostic test which includes MK and reported the achievement of major milestones. Celera Quest commenced testing of the samples obtained from the US National Cancer Institute (NCI) sponsored Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) trial on the Luminex platform. The Group has been advised that the PLCO study results are expected in late 2014. In addition, Celera Quest reported on the completion of four other clinical studies conducted as part of their clinical valida- tion program for the lung cancer test. Celera Quest has until 31 October 2014 to commercialise their lung cancer blood test with MK included, after which they maintain their ability to use MK, but will lose exclusivity under the terms of the license agreement. vi. Fujikura Kasei option to license The Group signed an Option to License Agreement with Fujikura Kasei for the exclusive supply of the Group’s propri- etary antibodies for validation in Fujikura’s latex diagnostic platform. The agreement provided that Fujikura will proceed to exercise its option to license subject to reaching the minimum 500 picogram/ml limit of detection. The validation program was completed successfully and Fujikura Kasei exercised its option to license in July 2013. A definitive license agreement is currently being negotiated between Fujikura Kasei and the Group. vii. Intellectual Property update The Group has a large and valuable patent portfolio which consists of 87 patents across 21 patent families. Of these 62 patents have been granted, 24 filed or under examination and one in PCT (Patent Cooperation Treaty) filing stage. The European Patent Office granted the therapeutic patent “Antibody Recognising C domain of midkine” with important claims around treatment of cancer in October 2013. Also in October 2013 the Japanese Patent office granted another midkine antibody patent entitled “Method for the treatment or prevention of diseases associated with a functional disorder of T Cells”. Financial position The net assets of the Group have increased by 7% to $5,663,726 ($5,305,157 at 30 June 2013). Importantly, current assets increased by 19% to $4,499,891 ($3,778,936 at 30 June 2013). The directors believe that the Group is in a stable financial position to carry out its current operations. Significant changes in state of affairs There have been no significant changes in the state of affairs of entities in the Group during the year. Dividends paid or recommended The Company has not paid or declared any dividends during the financial year (2013: nil). Events since the end of the financial year No matters or circumstances have arisen since the end of the financial year which significantly affected or could significantly affect the operations of the Group, the results of those operations or the state of affairs of the Group in future financial years. Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 13 Directors’ Report Continued Likely developments and expected results of operations Information on the Group’s likely developments in the operation of the consolidated entity and the expected results of operations have not been included in this annual report. Environmental regulations The Group’s operations are not regulated by any significant environmental regulations under a law of the Commonwealth or of a state or territory of Australia. Proceedings on behalf of the Company No person has applied to the Court under section 237 of the Corporations Act 2001 for leave to bring proceedings on behalf of the Group, or to intervene in any proceedings to which the Group is a party, for the purpose of taking responsibility on behalf of the Group for all or part of those proceedings. Meetings of directors Six meetings of the directors were held during the financial year (including committees of directors). Attendances by each director during the year were as follows: Directors’ Meetings Audit Committee Nomination Committee Remuneration Committee Number eligible to attend Number attended Number eligible to attend Number attended Number eligible to attend Number attended Number eligible to attend Number attended Dr David King Ms Maria Halasz Mr Martin Rogers Mr Graeme Kaufman 6 6 6 6 5 6 4 4 6 - 6 6 6 6 6 6 3 - - 3 3 - - 3 3 - 3 3 3 - 3 3 The names, qualifications, experience and special responsibilities of each person who has been a director during the year and to the date of this report are: Dr David King Qualifications – Chairman (Non-executive) – Fellow of The Australian Institute of Company Directors, Fellow of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists and a PHD in Seismology from the Australian National University. Experience – Experience in high growth companies and a track record in starting business ventures and developing them into attractive investment and/ or take over targets. Interest in shares and options – Shares: 22,500,000 indirectly held. Options: 11, 250,000 indirectly held (Expiry: 23 October 2016, exercisable at $0.034 each). Special responsibilities – Chairman of the Remuneration Committee and Nomination Committee, Other directorships in listed entities held in the previous three years and member of the Audit Committee. – Current directorships - Robust Resources Limited, Republic Gold Limited, Galilee Energy Limited, African Petroleum Corporation Limited and Tengri Resources Previous directorship - Gas2Grid Limited, Ausmon Resources Limited, Sapex Limited and Eastern Star Gas Limited. 14 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report Ms Maria Halasz Qualifications Experience Interest in shares and options – Managing Director (Executive) – A Graduate of the Australian Institute of Company Directors; MBA, BSc in microbiology. – Over 20 years’ experience in biotechnology companies; initially working in executive positions in biotechnology firms, then managing investment funds and later holding senior positions in corporate finance specialis- ing in life sciences. – Shares: 13,050,000 directly held. Shares: 9,450,000 indirectly held. Options: 7,000,000 (Expiry: 20 November 2014, exercisable at $0.056 each) indirectly held. Options: 1,500,000 (Expiry: 23 October 2016, exercisable at $0.034 each) indirectly held. Options: 5,000,000 (Expiry: 15 June 2017, exercisable at $0.032 each) indirectly held. Special responsibilities – Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer. Other directorships in listed entities held in the previous three years – None Mr Martin Rogers Qualifications Experience – Director (Non-executive) – Chemical Engineering and Science Degrees from University of New South Wales – Mr Rogers has been both an investor and senior executive in a private funded advisory business in the science and biotechnology sectors, where he was instrumental in significantly increasing the value of those investments. Mr Rogers also holds a number of not-for-profit roles. Interest in shares and options – Shares: 5,155,700 shares indirectly held. Options: 41,000,000 (Expiry: 23 October 2016, exercisable at $0.034 each) indirectly held Special responsibilities – Member of the Audit Committee and member of the Remuneration Committee Other directorships in listed entities held in the previous three years – Chairman of Actinogen Limited, non-executive director of Rhinomed Ltd and non-executive chairman of OncoSil Medical Limited Mr Graeme Kaufman – Director (Non-executive) Qualification Experience – BSc & MBA from Melbourne University – Over 46 years’ experience in biotechnology spanning technical, commercial and financial areas. Having worked for 34 years at CSL Limited, Australia’s largest biopharmaceutical company, he held senior positions including Production Director, General Manager Finance and General Manager Biosciences. Interest in shares and options – Nil Special responsibilities – Chairman of the Audit Committee and member of the Remuneration Other directorships in listed entities held in the previous three years Committee and Nomination Committee. – Bionomics Ltd and IDT Australia Ltd Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 15 Directors’ Report Continued Company Secretary Mr Jillian McGregor – Joint Company Secretary (Appointed 16 July 2013) Qualifications Experience – Bachelor of commerce and law from University of New South Wales – Jillian has worked as a corporate lawyer for more than 15 years in mid and top tier Australian law firms. During this time she has provided Corporations Act and ASX Listing Rule advice to many ASX listed companies including advice on related party transactions, capital raising requirements, and meeting continuous disclosure requirements. Mr Nicholas Falzon Qualifications Experience – Joint Company Secretary and Financial Controller – Bachelor of Business at UTS and a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Australia – As a partner at PKF Lawler Partners Nicholas works with a number of listed and unlisted companies advising them on all aspects of their finan- cial management. Directors have been in office since the start of the financial year to the date of this report unless otherwise stated. Remuneration report (audited) The information provided in this remuneration report has been audited as required by section 308 (3C) of the Corporations Act 2001. Principles used to determine the nature and amount of remuneration The performance of the Group depends on the quality of its directors and executives. To prosper, the Group must attract, motivate and retain highly skilled directors and executives. To this end, the Group embodies the following principles in its remuneration framework: • provide competitive rewards to attract high calibre executives; and • establish appropriate performance hurdles in relation to variable executive remuneration. The Board assesses the appropriateness of the nature and amount of remuneration of directors and senior managers of the Group on a periodic basis by reference to relevant employment market conditions with the overall objective of ensuring maximum stakeholder benefit from the retention of a high quality Board and executive team. Consolidated entity performance and link to remuneration Remuneration for certain individuals is directly linked to performance of the consolidated entity. No performance based bonus or incentive payments are in place, however Maria Halasz has employee share options that will vest upon achieving key milestones being achieved. These Milestones are detailed in the Equity-based compensation section of this remunera- tion report. The Nomination and Remuneration Committee is of the opinion that the continued improved results can be attributed in part to the adoption of performance based compensation and is satisfied that this improvement will continue to increase shareholder wealth if maintained over the coming years. 16 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report The table below details the last five years earnings and total shareholders return. Sales EBITDA EBIT $ 2014 $ 2013 $ 2012 $ 2011 $ 2010 1,150,931 541,649 132,826 149,735 325,999 (2,165,345) (2,341,372) (2,702,954) (2,776,753) (1,580,973) (2,277,485) (2,358,006) (2,714,373) (2,777,009) (1,594,694) Loss after income tax (1,480,836) (1,541,307) (1,972,483) (2,269,637) (1,339,948) The factors that are considered to affect total shareholders return (‘TSR’) are summarised below: Share price at financial year end Total dividends declared Basic earnings per share Remuneration structure $ 2014 0.03 - (0.21) $ 2013 0.02 - (0.27) $ 2012 0.02 - (0.46) $ 2011 0.02 - (0.65) $ 2010 0.02 - (0.48) In accordance with best practice corporate governance, the structure of non-executive director and senior manager remuneration is separate and distinct. Non-executive director remuneration Objective The Board seeks to set aggregate remuneration at a level that provides the Group with the ability to attract and retain direc- tors of the highest calibre, while incurring costs that are acceptable to shareholders. Structure Each non-executive director receives a fixed fee for being a director of the Group. The constitution and the ASX listing Rules specify that the maximum aggregate remuneration of non-executive directors shall be determined from time to time by a general meeting of shareholders. At the general meeting of shareholders in 2005, the maximum amount was set at $300,000 per annum. In 2014, the Group paid non-executive directors a total of $157,780 ($145,802 in 2013). The amount of aggregate remuneration sought to be approved by shareholders and the fixed fees paid to directors are reviewed annually. The Board considers fees paid to non-executive directors of comparable companies when undertaking the annual review process. Executive remuneration Objective The Group aims to reward executives with a level and mix of remuneration commensurate with their position and respon- sibilities within the Group and so as to: • reward executives for Group and individual performance against targets set by reference to appropriate benchmarks; • align the interests of executives with those of shareholders; and • ensure total remuneration is competitive by market standards. Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 17 Directors’ Report Continued Structure A policy of the Board is the establishment of employment or consulting contracts with the CEO and other senior executives. Remuneration consists of fixed remuneration under an employment or consultancy agreement and may include long term equity based incentives that are subject to satisfaction of performance conditions. Details of these performance conditions are outlined in the equity based payments section of this remuneration report.The equity based incentives are intended to retain key executives and reward performance against agreed performance objectives. Fixed remuneration The level of fixed remuneration is set so as to provide a base level of remuneration that is both appropriate to the position and competitive in the market. Fixed remuneration is reviewed annually by the Board and the process consists of a review of Group wide and individual performance, relevant comparative remuneration in the market, and internal and (where appropriate) external advice on policies and practices. Senior managers are given the opportunity to receive their fixed (primary) remuneration in a variety of forms including cash and expense payment plans, such that the manner of payment chosen is optimal for the recipient without creating additional cost for the Group. Remuneration policy and performance Other than the CEO, Ms Halasz, none of the directors’ remuneration is at risk’ remuneration. Refer below for further infor- mation on Ms Halasz’s remuneration. Remuneration details for the year ended 30 June 2014 Details of the remuneration of the directors and key management personnel of the group (as defined in AASB 124 Related Party Disclosures) and the highest paid executives of Cellmid are set out in the following tables. 2014 Cash salary fees Cash bonus Superannuation Options Short term benefits Post employment benefits Share based payments $ 5,999 3,448 - - $ - - - - Total $ 70,999 40,948 45,833 157,780 27,750 52,047 514,268 - - - 37,197 52,047 672,048 Non-executive directors David King Graeme Kaufman Martin Rogers Total non-executive directors Executive directors and key management Maria Halasz Nicholas Falzon1 $ 65,000 37,500 45,833 148,333 434,471 - 582,804 $ - - - - - - - 18 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 2013 Cash salary fees Cash bonus Superannuation Options Short term benefits Post employment Share based payments Non-executive directors David King Graeme Kaufman Martin Rogers Robin Beaumont2 Total non-executive directors Executive directors and key management Maria Halasz Nicholas Falzon1 $ 65,000 34,058 33,062 4,767 136,887 400,000 - 536,887 $ - - - - - - - - $ 5,850 3,065 - - 8,915 36,000 - 44,915 $ - - - - - - - - Total $ 70,850 37,123 33,062 4,767 145,802 436,000 - 581,802 1. Nicholas Falzon, company secretary, was appointed on 6 October 2010, is a director of PKF Lawler Partners Pty Ltd who provides accounting and company secretarial services to Cellmid Limited. The contract is based on normal commercial terms. A total of $105,600 ($92,125 in 2013) was received by PKF Lawler Partners Pty Limited in relation to this contract for the year. 2. Robin Beaumont resigned as director on 27th August 2012. KMP shareholdings The number of shares held in the company during the financial year by each director and key management personnel of Cellmid Limited, including their personally related parties, are set out below. Balance at beginning of year Received as part of remuneration Other changes Balance at end of year 22,500,000 - - 22,500,000 6,750,000 12,000,000 3,750,000 22,500,000 - 5,155,700 22,500,000 2,725,250 - - - - - - - - - - - - 5,155,700 22,500,000 4,024,750 6,750,000 - - 5,155,700 5,155,700 2014 David King Maria Halasz Graeme Kaufman Martin Rogers 2013 David King Maria Halasz Graeme Kaufman Martin Rogers KMP option holdings The number of options held in the company during the financial year by each director and member of key management personnel of Cellmid Limited, including their personally related parties, are set out below. Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 19 Directors’ Report Continued Balance at beginning of year 11,250,000 16,362,625 1,000,000 44,000,000 - 17,000,000 - - 2014 David King Maria Halasz Graeme Kaufman Martin Rogers 2013 David King Maria Halasz Graeme Kaufman Martin Rogers - - - - - - Acquired Expired/ forfeited Other changes Balance at end of year Vested and exercisable at end of year - - 137,375 (3,000,000) (1,000,000) (3,000,000) - - - - 11,250,000 11,250,000 13,500,000 13,500,000 - - 41,000,000 41,000,000 - - - - 11,250,000 11,250,000 11,250,000 (637,375) 16,362,625 16,362,625 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 44,000,000 44,000,000 44,000,000 Relationship between remuneration policy and company performance The relative proportions of remuneration that are linked to performance and those that are fixed are as follows: Fixed remuneration At risk STI At risk LTI 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 Directors David King Maria Halasz Graeme Kaufman Martin Rogers 100% 89.9% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Other key management personnel Nicholas Falzon 100% 100% - - - - - - - - - - - 10.1% - - - - - - - - Service agreements The CEO, Maria Halasz, is an employee of the group under an agreement signed on 21 September 2007. Under the terms of the present contact: • Ms Halasz may resign from her position and thus terminate this contract by giving six months’ written notice. On resignation any unvested options will be forfeited. • The group may terminate the employment agreement by providing six months’ written notice or providing payment in lieu of the notice period (based on the fixed component of Ms Halasz’s remuneration). • The group may terminate the contract at any time without notice if serious misconduct has occurred. Where termination with cause occurs, the CEO is only entitled to that portion of remuneration which is fixed, and only up to the date of termination. On termination with cause, any unvested options will immediately be forfeited. • Ms Halasz’s employment agreement provides for issuing performance incentives subject to the discretion of the board. During the 2014 financial year there has been no performance incentive issued to Ms Halasz. 20 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report Equity based compensation Details of the options granted as remuneration to those key management personnel and executives during the year: Share based payments Options Granted in 2014 Value of options at grant date Options vested in 2014 Directors David King Maria Halasz1 Graeme Kaufman Martin Rogers Other key management personnel Nick Falzon No - $ - 12,000,000 219,600 - - - - - - No - - - - - Value of options expensed in 2014 $ - 52,047 - - - Proportion of remuneration - 10.1% - - - 1. On 25 November 2013, 12,000,000 loan shares were granted to Maria Halasz in three equal tranches under the Cellmid Limited and Controlled Entities Employee Incentive Plan and as approved by shareholders at the annual general meeting on 22 November 2013. Ordinary shares were issued under the arrangement funded by a limited recourse loan with the following vesting conditions attached: Tranche Vesting date Shares Vesting condition 1 2 3 25/11/2016 4,000,000 25/11/2016 4,000,000 25/11/2016 4,000,000 Shares will vest at any time before the vesting date when the Group’s operating revenue reaches a total of $4,000,000 over any consecutive 12 months. Shares will vest at any time before the vesting date subject to the first patient being recruited into the Group’s planned midkine antibody trial. Shares will vest at any time before the vesting date subject to the signing of one of the following agreements for the Group’s consumer health products in a territory outside of Australia and Japan: (a) a diagnostic or therapeutic licence; or (b) a distribution agreement. The effect of the arrangement is akin to an option. Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 21 Directors’ Report Continued Shares under option Unissued ordinary shares of the Company under option at the date of this report are as follows: Unlisted options Unlisted options Unlisted options Unlisted options Unlisted options Unlisted options Listed options Unlisted options Unlisted options Expiry date 1 July 2014 20 November 2014 20 November 2014 19 February 2015 15 November 2015 15 November 2016 23 October 2016 15 June 2017 14 August 2017 Exercise Price Number under option $ 0.05 $ 0.06 $ 0.04 $ 0.06 $ 0.10 $ 0.03 $ 0.03 $ 0.03 $ 0.03 5,002,006 7,000,000 2,000,000 600,000 100,000 3,971,962 290,542,770 5,000,000 1,440,000 315,656,738 No shares were issued on the exercise of options during the financial year ended 30 June 2014 (nil in 2013). No further shares have been issued on exercise of options since 30 June 2014. 12,000,000 shares were held in escrow and unpaid at 30 June 2014 (nil in 2013). Refer to note 18(a) for further details. 38,448,435 options were lapsed during the financial year ended 30 June 2014 (2,000,000 in 2013). Loans to directors and other members of key management personnel There were no loans to directors or other members of key management personnel during or since the end of the financial year. Other On the 25th of November 2013, the Company acquired the remaining 5% interest in its subsidiary, Advangen International Pty Ltd from Direct Capital Group Pty Limited. Direct Capital Group Pty Limited is a company wholly owned by Maria Halasz and was acquired for a consideration of 3,515,625 shares in Cellmid Limited, with a market value of $119,531. Indemnification and insurance of officers and auditors During the financial year, the Group paid a premium to insure the directors and officers of the Group. The liabilities insured are legal costs that may be incurred in defending civil or criminal proceedings that may be brought against the officers in their capacity as officers of the Group, and any other payments arising from liabilities incurred by the officers in connection with such proceedings. This does not include such liabilities (other than legal costs) that arise from conduct involving a wilful breach of duty by the officers or the improper use by the officers of their position or of informa- tion to gain advantage for them or someone else or to cause detriment to the Company. It is not possible to apportion the premium between amounts relating to the insurance against legal costs and those relating to other liabilities. During or since the end of the financial year, the Group has given an indemnity or entered into an agreement to indemnify, or paid or agreed to pay insurance premiums in favour of its directors as follows: • a right to access certain Board papers of the Group during the period of their tenure and for a period of seven years after that tenure ends 22 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report • subject to the Corporation Act 2001, an indemnity in respect of liability to persons other the Company and its related bodies corporate that they may incur while acting in their capacity as an officer of the Company or a related body corporate, except for specified liabilities where that liability involves a lack of good faith or is for legal costs for defending certain legal proceedings; and • the requirement that the Group maintain appropriate directors’ and officers’ insurance for the officer. No liability has arisen under these indemnities as at the date of the report. There is no indemnity cover in favour of the auditor of the Group during the financial year. Non audit services The Group may decide to employ the auditor on assignments additional to their statutory audit duties where the auditor’s expertise and experience with the Group and/or the Group are important. Details of the amounts paid or payable to the auditor, BDO for audit and non audit services provided during the year are set out below. The nature of the services provided does not compromise the general principles relating to auditor independence in accordance with APES 110: Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants set by the Accounting Professional and Ethical Standards Board. Auditing or reviewing the financial statements BDO East Coast Partnership – Australia BDO Toyo & Co - Japan 2014 $ 52,500 10,479 62,979 2013 $ 54,900 10,200 65,100 ASIC class order 98/100 rounding of amounts The Company is an entity to which ASIC Class Order 98/100 applies and, accordingly, amounts in the financial statements and directors’ report have been rounded to the nearest dollar, unless otherwise indicated. This concludes the remuneration report which has been audited. Auditor’s independence declaration The auditor’s independence declaration in accordance with section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001 for the year ended 30 June 2014 has been received and can be found on page 56 of the financial report. This director’s report, incorporating the remuneration report, is signed in accordance with a resolution of the Board of Directors. Director Dr David King Dated this 29th day of August 2014 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 23 24 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report Corporate Governance statement Unless disclosed below, all the recommendations of the ASX Corporate Governance Council (including 2010 amendments) have been applied for the entire financial year ended 30 June 2014 (ASX Principles). Board Composition The skills, experience and expertise relevant to the position of each director who is in office at the date of the annual report and their term of office are detailed in the directors’ report. The names of independent directors that have served on the board of directors of the company (Board) during the period are: o David King o Graeme Kaufman o Martin Rogers Independent directors are those who have the ability to exercise their duties unfettered by any business or other relationship and are willing to express their opinions free of concern about their position or the position of any third party. The Board does not believe it is possible to draft a list of criteria which is appropriate to characterise, in all circumstances, whether a non-executive director is independent. However, in determining the independent status of a director the Board will consider whether the director: o is a substantial shareholder of the Company or an officer of, or otherwise associated directly with, a substantial shareholder of the Company; o is employed, or has previously been employed in an executive capacity by the Company or another group member; o has within the last three years been a principal of a material professional adviser or a material consultant to the Company or another group member, or an employee materially associated with the service provided; o is a material supplier or customer of the Company or another group member, or an officer of or otherwise associated directly or indirectly with a material supplier or customer; o has a material contractual relationship with the Company or another group member other than as a director. In some cases the Board needs to make an assessment of the materiality of a relationship in order to determine if a direc- tor is independent. A “material relationship” includes a direct or indirect interest or relationship that could reasonably be considered to influence in a material way the director’s decisions in relation to the Company. When considering whether a relationship is “material”, the Board will consider the materiality to each of the Company, the director and the person or or- ganisation with which the director is related (as customer, supplier, or adviser). The Board has not set materiality thresholds, considering it more effective to assess relationships on the individual circumstances applicable on a case by case basis and where appropriate, with the assistance of external advice. Independent directors have the right to seek independent professional advice in the furtherance of their duties as directors at the Company’s expense. Written approval must be obtained from the Chairman prior to incurring any expense on behalf of the Company. David King, Graeme Kaufman and Martin Rogers are members of the nomination committee. These members have attend- ed meetings of the nomination committee on an ad hoc basis as needed during the year. When appointing new directors, the Board and the nomination committee look to ensure that an appropriate balance of skills, experience, expertise and diversity is maintained. The Board has not approved a formal nomination committee charter and as such, no such charter or summary of such charter is disclosed on the Company’s website. Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 25 Corporate Governance Continued Ethical Standards The Board acknowledges and emphasises the importance of all directors and employees maintaining the highest stand- ards of corporate governance practice and ethical conduct. A code of conduct has been established requiring directors and employees to: • act honestly and in good faith; • exercise due care and diligence in fulfilling the functions of office; • avoid conflicts and make full disclosure of any possible conflict of interest; • comply with the law; • encourage the reporting and investigating of unlawful and unethical behaviour; and • comply with the share trading policy outlined in the code of conduct. Directors are obliged to be independent in judgment and ensure all reasonable steps are taken to ensure due care is taken by the Board in making sound decisions. Diversity Policy Diversity includes, but is not limited to, gender, age, ethnicity and cultural background. The Company is committed to diversity and recognises the benefits arising from employee and Board diversity and the importance of benefiting from all available talent. Induction All new directors participate in a formal induction process co-ordinated by the company secretary. This induction process includes briefings on the Company’s financial, strategic, operational and risk management position, the Company’s govern- ance framework and key developments in the Company and the industry and environment in which it operates. The Board believes that the Company benefits from this diversity. However, due to the size of the Company and small number of persons employed by the Company and its controlled enti- ties, the Board has not established a formal diversity policy in accordance with Recommendation 3.2 of the ASX Principles. As such and for the same reasons, the Company is not able to disclose in this annual report the measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity in accordance with the diversity policy and progress towards achieving those objectives. The Company is able to disclose the following gender diversity statistics for the Company and its controlled entities as at the date of this annual report: • women employees (67%); • women in senior executive positions (57%); and • women on the Board (25%). Trading policy The Company has a policy on the sale and purchase of its securities by its directors and employees. In addition, this policy applies to advisers, contractors and consultants who may obtain confidential or price sensitive information in relation to the Company. The purpose of the policy is to avoid conduct known as ‘insider trading’. In some respects, the Company’s policy extends beyond the strict requirements of the Corporations Act 200 1 (Cth) (Corporations Act). 26 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report Audit Committee The names and qualifications of those appointed to the audit committee and their attendance at meetings of the committee are included in the directors’ report. CEO/CFO Declaration As required by section 295A of the Corporations Act, the CEO and CFO have declared that in their opinion: a. the financial records of the Company and controlled entities for the financial year have been properly maintained in accordance with section 286 of the Corporations Act; b. the financial statements and notes for the financial year comply with accounting standards; c. the financial statements and notes for the financial year give a true and fair view of the financial position and performance of the Company and its controlled entities in accordance section 297 of the Corporations Act; d. any other matters prescribed by the Corporations Regulations in relation to the financial statements and notes for the financial year have been satisfied. In addition, in accordance with Recommendation 7.3 of the ASX Principles, the CEO and CFO stated to the Board that, the declaration provided under section 295A of the Corporations Act is founded on a sound system of risk management and internal control and that the system is operating effectively in all material respects in relation to financial reporting risks. Performance Evaluation An annual performance evaluation of the Board has not been made during the year. A performance evaluation for the CEO has taken place during the financial year in accordance with the evaluation process disclosed by the Company. This evaluation has been conducted by the Chairman on a quarterly basis during the year with regard to performance measures set at the commencement of the year. A performance evaluation for other senior management has been conducted by the CEO during the financial year in ac- cordance with the evaluation process disclosed by the Company. Board Roles and Responsibilities The Board is first and foremost accountable to its shareholders through delivery of timely and balanced disclosures. The Board sought external guidance to assist the drafting of its “Board Charter” which has been made publicly available on the Company’s website. This document details the adopted practices and processes in relation to matters reserved for the Board’s consideration and decision making. The Board is ultimately responsible for ensuring its actions are in accordance with key corporate governance principles. Shareholder Rights Shareholders are entitled to vote on significant matters impacting on the business, which include the election and remu- neration of directors and changes to the constitution. Shareholders are strongly encouraged to attend and participate in the Annual General Meetings of the company, to lodge questions to be answered by the Board and/or the CEO, and are able to appoint proxies. Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 27 Risk Management The Board considers identification and management of key risks associated with the business as vital to maximise share- holder wealth. A yearly assessment of the business’s risk profile is undertaken and reviewed by the Board, covering all aspects of the business from the operational level through to strategic level risks. The CEO has been delegated the task of implementing internal controls to identify and manage risks for which the Board provides oversight and is required to report to the Board on whether such risks are being managed effectively. The effectiveness of the implemented internal controls is monitored and reviewed regularly. During the year, the CEO has reported to the Board as to the effectiveness of the Company’s management of its material business risks. Remuneration Policies The Company’s remuneration committee comprises of the following non-executive directors: o David King (Chair, independent) o Graeme Kaufman (independent) o Martin Rogers (independent) The remuneration committee reviews the senior executive packages annually by reference to Company performance, ex- ecutive performance, comparable information from industry sectors and other listed companies and independent advice. Executives may also be entitled to participate in the Company’s employee incentive plan. The amounts of remuneration for all key management personnel for the Company, including all monetary and non monetary components, are detailed in the directors’ report under the heading key management personnel compensation. All remu- neration paid to executives is valued at the cost to the Company and expensed. Shares given to executives are valued as the difference between the market price of those shares and the amount paid by the executive. Options are valued using the Black Scholes methodology. The Board expects that the remuneration structure implemented will result in the Company being able to attract and retain the best executives to run the consolidated group. It will also provide executives with the necessary incentives to work to grow long term shareholder value. The payment of bonuses, options and other incentive payments are reviewed by the remuneration committee annually as part of the review of executive remuneration and a recommendation is put to the Board for approval. All bonuses, options and incentives must be linked to predetermined performance criteria. The Board can exercise its discretion in relation to approving incentives, bonuses and options and can recommend changes to the committee’s recommendations. Any changes must be justified by reference to measurable performance criteria. Remuneration Committee The names of the members of the remuneration committee and their attendance at meetings of the committee are detailed in the directors’ report. The Board has not approved a formal remuneration committee charter and as such, no such charter or summary of such charter is disclosed on the Company’s website. There are no schemes for retirement benefits other than statutory superannuation for non-executive directors. 28 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report financial Report 31 32 33 34 35 69 70 Contents Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income Consolidated Statement of Financial Position Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows Notes to the Financial Statements Directors’ Declaration Independent Auditor’s Report Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 29 Consolidated statement of profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive income for the year ended 30 June 2014 Consolidated Revenue Other revenue Other income Less Expenditure Cost of sales Advertisement and marketing expense Bad debts expense Consultancy expenses Conferences and meetings Communication expenses Depreciation and amortisation expense Employee benefits expense Finance costs Gain/(Loss) on foreign exchange Occupancy expenses Professional fees Research and development expenses Share based compensation Subscription expenses Travel expenses Other expenses Loss before income tax Income tax benefit Loss for the year after income tax Other comprehensive income, net of income tax Note 3 3 3 2014 $ 1,150,931 1,123,956 521,061 2,795,948 (333,085) (257,763) (978) (452,376) (150,653) (88,982) (112,140) 2013 $ 541,649 55,597 164,042 761,288 (84,606) (214,411) (1,227) (422,171) (47,314) (37,122) (16,634) (1,702,980) (1,036,123) (2,511) (28,926) (195,236) (84,214) (722,882) (133,523) (95,091) (253,302) (409,248) (1,124) 13,338 (102,058) (108,434) (475,361) (4,032) (71,035) (201,255) (278,892) (2,227,942) (2,327,173) 5 747,106 785,866 (1,480,836) (1,541,307) Items that will be reclassified to profit or loss when specific conditions are met Exchange differences on translating foreign controlled entities Total comprehensive income for the year Loss for the year attributable to: Owners of Cellmid Limited Non controlling interest Total comprehensive income attributable to: Owners of Cellmid Limited Non controlling interest (180,898) 216,257 (1,661,734) (1,325,050) (1,473,815) (1,528,041) (7,021) (13,266) (1,480,836) (1,541,307) (1,654,713) (1,311,784) (7,021) (13,266) (1,661,734) (1,325,050) Loss per share for loss attributable to the ordinary equity holders of the company Basic loss per share (cents) Diluted loss per share (cents) 9 9 (0.21) (0.21) (0.27) (0.27) The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements. Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 31 Consolidated statement of financial position As at 30 June 2014 ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents Trade and other receivables Inventories Other assets TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS NON CURRENT ASSETS Plant and equipment Intangible assets TOTAL NON CURRENT ASSETS TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES CURRENT LIABILITIES Trade and other payables Employee benefits TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES NON CURRENT LIABILITIES Employee benefits TOTAL NON CURRENT LIABILITIES TOTAL LIABILITIES NET ASSETS EQUITY Issued capital Reserves Accumulated losses Capital and reserves attributable to owners of Cellmid Limited Non controlling interest TOTAL EQUITY 32 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report Consolidated 2014 $ 2013 $ Note 10 11 12 15 13 14 16 17 17 18 19 2,501,753 220,471 1,709,365 68,302 1,754,994 255,695 1,694,926 73,321 4,499,891 3,778,936 43,269 1,911,265 1,954,534 6,454,425 51,633 2,163,150 2,214,783 5,993,719 563,183 166,254 729,437 61,262 61,262 790,699 5,663,726 501,299 134,755 636,054 52,508 52,508 688,562 5,305,157 27,401,832 25,336,522 1,705,205 1,966,375 (23,443,311) (21,969,496) 5,663,726 - 5,663,726 5,333,401 (28,244) 5,305,157 Consolidated statement of Changes in Equity for the year ended 30 June 2014 y t i u q E l a t o T s t s e r e t n I l a t o T n o N g n i l l o r t n o c d e t a l s e s s o L - u m u c c A i n g e r o F e v r e s e R e g n a h c x E e r a h S d e s a B l a r e n e G e v r e s e R e v r e s e R s t n e m y a P e v r e s e R n o i t i s u q c A i d e u s s I l a t i p a C e t o N 4 2 5 , 4 7 0 3 5 , 8 7 1 , 2 ) 0 2 2 , 3 1 1 ( - - - ) 1 3 5 , 9 1 1 ( 5 6 2 , 5 3 4 2 5 , 4 7 0 3 5 , 8 7 1 , 2 ) 0 2 2 , 3 1 1 ( ) 6 9 7 , 4 5 1 ( - - - - - - - - ) 6 3 8 , 0 8 4 , 1 ( ) 1 2 0 , 7 ( ) 5 1 8 , 3 7 4 , 1 ( ) 5 1 8 , 3 7 4 , 1 ( - ) 8 9 8 , 0 8 1 ( - ) 8 9 8 , 0 8 1 ( - ) 8 9 8 , 0 8 1 ( ) , 4 3 7 1 6 6 1 , ( ) 1 2 0 , 7 ( ) , 3 1 7 4 5 6 1 ( , ) 5 1 8 , 3 7 4 , 1 ( ) 8 9 8 , 0 8 1 ( - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 2 5 , 4 7 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 7 5 1 , 5 0 3 , 5 ) 4 4 2 , 8 2 ( 1 0 4 , 3 3 3 , 5 ) 6 9 4 , 9 6 9 , 1 2 ( 7 5 2 , 6 1 2 5 5 8 , 2 2 3 6 2 , 7 2 7 , 1 $ - - - - - - - $ 2 2 5 , 6 3 3 , 5 2 3 1 0 2 y u J 1 l t a e c n a a B l - - - - 0 3 5 8 7 1 , , 2 ) 0 2 2 3 1 1 , ( 9 1 e m o c n i i e v s n e h e r p m o c r e h t O i e v s n e h e r p m o c l a t o T r a e y e h t r o f e m o c n i r e t f a r a e y e h t r o f s s o L x a t e m o c n i l s r e d o h y t i u q e h t i w s n o i t c a s n a r T 9 1 8 1 n o i t a s n e p m o c d e s a b e r a h S e h t g n i r u d d e u s s i s e r a h S s t s o c n o i t c a s n a r T r a e y ) 6 9 7 , 4 5 1 ( - 9 1 g n i l l o r t n o c n o n i e s n g o c e r e D t s e r e t n i 6 2 7 , 3 6 6 5 , - 6 2 7 3 6 6 , , 5 ) 1 1 3 , 3 4 4 , 3 2 ( 9 5 3 , 5 3 5 5 8 , 2 2 7 8 7 , 1 0 8 , 1 ) 6 9 7 , 4 5 1 ( 2 3 8 , 1 0 4 , 7 2 4 1 0 2 e n u J 0 3 t a e c n a a B l 4 8 4 , 9 8 0 , 2 ) 8 7 9 , 4 1 ( 2 6 4 , 4 0 1 , 2 ) 5 5 4 , 1 4 4 , 0 2 ( ) 7 0 3 , 1 4 5 , 1 ( ) 6 6 2 , 3 1 ( ) 1 4 0 , 8 2 5 , 1 ( ) 1 4 0 , 8 2 5 , 1 ( - - 3 3 0 , 4 0 9 6 , 6 3 5 , 4 - - 3 3 0 , 4 0 9 6 , 6 3 5 , 4 - - - - 7 5 2 , 6 1 2 - 7 5 2 , 6 1 2 - 7 5 2 , 6 1 2 ) , 0 5 0 5 2 3 1 , ( ) 6 6 2 , 3 1 ( ) , 4 8 7 1 1 3 1 ( , ) 1 4 0 , 8 2 5 , 1 ( 7 5 2 , 6 1 2 - - - - - - - - - 3 3 0 , 4 5 5 8 , 2 2 0 3 2 , 3 2 7 , 1 7 5 1 , 5 0 3 5 , ) 4 4 2 , 8 2 ( 1 0 4 , 3 3 3 , 5 ) 6 9 4 , 9 6 9 , 1 2 ( 7 5 2 , 6 1 2 5 5 8 , 2 2 3 6 2 , 7 2 7 , 1 - - - - - - - 2 3 8 , 9 9 7 , 0 2 2 1 0 2 l y u J 1 t a e c n a a B l - - - - 0 9 6 , 6 3 5 4 , 9 1 e m o c n i i e v s n e h e r p m o c r e h t O i e v s n e h e r p m o c l a t o T e m o c n i r e t f a r a e y e h t r o f s s o L x a t e m o c n i l s r e d o h y t i u q e h t i w s n o i t c a s n a r T 8 1 9 1 n o i t a s n e p m o c d e s a b e r a h S y t i u q e f o n o i t u b i r t n o C 2 2 5 , 6 3 3 , 5 2 3 1 0 2 e n u J 0 3 t a e c n a a B l Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 33 Consolidated statement of Cash flows for the year ended 30 June 2014 CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Receipts from customers (inclusive of GST) Payments to suppliers and employees (inclusive of GST) Research and development expenses Interest received Income tax benefit Other grant income Finance costs Consolidated 2014 $ 2013 $ Note 1,856,193 644,080 (4,268,421) (2,552,229) (722,882) (475,361) 52,026 754,233 91,542 (2,496) 30,833 785,866 115,167 (1,124) Net cash used in operating activities 20 (2,239,805) (1,452,768) CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Payment for acquisition of subsidiary, net of cash acquired Proceeds on sale of financial asset Purchase of non current assets Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Proceeds from issue of shares (net of share issue costs) Net cash provided by financing activities Net increase in cash and cash equivalents held Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of financial year Effect of exchange rate changes - (803,911) 1,000,260 (3,259) 997,001 91,785 (26,734) (738,860) 2,006,313 2,006,313 2,864,561 2,864,561 763,509 672,933 1,754,994 1,050,593 (16,750) 31,468 Cash and cash equivalents at end of financial year 10 2,501,753 1,754,994 34 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report notes to the financial statements Contents 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies 2. Parent Information 3. Revenue and Other Income 4. Profit/(Loss) for the year 5. Income Tax Expense 6. Business Combinations 7. Interests of Key Management Personnel (KMP) 8. Auditor’s Remuneration 9. Earnings per Share 10. Cash and Cash Equivalents 11. Trade and Other Receivables 12. Inventories 13. Plant and Equipment 14. Intangible Assets 15. Other Assets 16. Trade and Other Payables 17. Provisions 18. Contributed Equity 19. Reserves 20. Cash Flow Information 21. Events after the Reporting Period 22. Related Party Transactions 23. Financial Risk Management 24. Interests in Subsidiaries 25. Segment Information 26. Commitments 27. Contingent liabilities and Contingent assets 28. Share Based Payments 29. Company Details 36 47 48 48 49 51 52 52 53 53 54 54 54 55 56 56 56 57 59 60 60 60 61 63 63 64 65 65 66 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 35 notes to the financial statements Continued NOTE 1: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Statement of compliance The Company is a public company, listed on the Australian Stock Exchange. It is incorporated in Australia and is domiciled in Australia. The financial statements are general purpose financial statements that have been prepared in accordance with Austral- ian Accounting Standards, Australian Accounting Interpretations, other authoritative pronouncements of the Australian Accounting Standards Board and the Corporations Act 2001, as appropriate for profit oriented entities. These financial statements also comply with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Stand- ards Board (IASB) The financial statements comprise the consolidated financial statements of the Group. The financial statements were authorised for issue by the directors on 29 August 2014. Basis of Preparation The financial statements have been prepared on an accruals basis and are based on historical costs, except for certain non current assets and financial instruments that are measured at re-valued amounts or fair values, as explained in the accounting policies below. Historical cost is generally based on the fair values of the consideration given in exchange for assets. All amounts are presented in Australian dollars, unless otherwise noted. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with AIFRS requires the use of certain accounting estimates. It also requires management to exercise its judgement in the process of applying the group’s accounting policies. The areas involving a higher degree of judgement or complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the financial statements, are disclosed in Note 1(w). New, revised or amending Accounting Standards and Interpretations adopted During the current year, the following standards became mandatory and have been adopted retrospectively by the Group: • AASB 10 Consolidated Financial Statements • AASB 11 Joint Arrangements • AASB 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities • AASB 13 Fair Value Measurement • AASB 119 Employee Benefits • AASB 127 Separate Financial Statements • AASB 2011 4 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards to Remove Individual Key Management Personnel Disclosure Requirements [AASB 124] • AASB 2011 7 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from the Consolidation and Joint Arrangements Standards [AASB 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 101, 107, 112, 118, 121, 124, 132, 133, 136, 138, 139, 1023 & 1038 and Interpreta- tions 5, 9, 16 & 17] • AASB 2012 9 Amendments to AASB 1048 arising from the Withdrawal of Australian Interpretation 1039 • AASB 2012 2 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards Disclosures Offsetting Financial Assets and 36 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report Financial Liabilities The accounting policies have been updated to reflect changes in the recognition and measurement of assets, liabilities, income and expenses and the impact of adoption of these standards is discussed below. AASB 10 Consolidated Financial Statements is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013 and therefore the Group has applied it for the first time in these financial statements. AASB 10 includes a new definition of control, including additional guidance for specific situations such as control in a principal / agent situation and when holding less than majority voting rights may give control. AASB 10 supersedes the previous requirements of AASB 127 Consoli- dated and Separate Financial Statements and Interpretation 112 Consolidation Special Purpose Entities and resulted in consequential amendments to a number of other standards. The Group has reviewed its investment in other entities to determine whether any changes were required to the Group under AASB 10. The composition of the Group is the same under AASB 10 and therefore there is no change to the reported financial position and performance. AASB 11 Joint Arrangements replaces AASB 131 Interests in Joint Ventures and Interpretation 112 Jointly Controlled Enti- ties Nonmonetary Contributions by Venturers as well as consequential amendments to a number of other standards. AASB 11 uses the revised definition of control from AASB 10 and once joint control is determined, then classifies joint arrange- ments as either joint ventures or joint operations. Joint ventures are accounted for using the equity method, proportionate consolidation is not permitted under AASB 11. Joint operations are accounted for by incorporating the venturer’s share of assets, liabilities, income and expenses into the financial statements. There were no changes to the accounting for joint arrangements under AASB 11. AASB 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities includes all disclosures relating to an entity’s interest in associates, joint arrangements, subsidiaries and structured entities. On adoption of AASB 12, additional disclosures have been included in the financial statements in relation to investments held. AASB 13 Fair Value Measurement does not change what and when assets or liabilities are recorded at fair value. It provides guidance on how to measure assets and liabilities at fair value, including the concept of highest and best use for nonfinan- cial assets. AASB 13 has not had an impact on the Group as no assets or liabilities are held at fair value. AASB 119 Employee benefits changes the basis for determining the income or expense relating to defined benefit plans and introduces revised definitions for short-term employee benefits and termination benefits. The Group reviewed the annual leave liability to determine the level of annual leave which is expected to be paid more than 12 months after the end of the reporting period. Whilst this has been considered to be a long-term employee benefits for the purpose of measuring the leave under AASB 119, the effect of discounting was not considered to be material and therefore has not been performed. AASB 2011 4 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards to Remove Individual Key Management Personnel Disclo- sure Requirements [AASB 124] to Remove Individual Key Management Personnel Disclosure Requirements removes the individual key management personnel (KMP) disclosures contained in Aus paragraphs 29.1 to 29.9.3. The individual disclosures are not required by either AASB 124’s international equivalent IAS 24 Related Parties (which requires only aggregate, rather than individual, amounts of KMP compensation) or its New Zealand equivalent. In addition, the AASB believes that these disclosures are more in the nature of governance and so are better dealt with as part of the Corporations Act 2001. As a result, the detailed individual KMP remuneration has been removed from Note 6. In accordance with the transition provisions in the standard, the comparative figures have been restated. Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 37 notes to the financial statements Continued a. Going Concern The Directors have prepared the financial statements on a going concern basis, which contemplates continuity of normal business activities and the realisation of assets and the settlement of liabilities in the ordinary course of business. Based on anticipated levels of operational cash flow, the Group has sufficient cash to fund current operations for more than one year. b. Principles of Consolidation Subsidiaries are all those entities over which the consolidated entity has control. The consolidated entity controls an entity when the consolidated entity is exposed to, or has rights to, variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power to direct the activities of the entity. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the consolidated entity. They are de-consolidated from the date that control ceases. Intercompany transactions, balances and unrealised gains on transactions between entities in the consolidated entity are eliminated. Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of the impairment of the asset transferred. Accounting policies of subsidiaries have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the poli- cies adopted by the consolidated entity. The acquisition of subsidiaries is accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. A change in ownership inter- est, without the loss of control, is accounted for as an equity transaction, where the difference between the consideration transferred and the book value of the share of the non-controlling interest acquired is recognised directly in equity attribut- able to the parent. Non-controlling interest in the results and equity of subsidiaries are shown separately in the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income, statement of financial position and statement of changes in equity of the consolidated entity. Losses incurred by the consolidated entity are attributed to the non-controlling interest in full, even if that results in a deficit balance. Where the consolidated entity loses control over a subsidiary, it derecognises the assets including goodwill, liabilities and non-controlling interest in the subsidiary together with any cumulative translation differences recognised in equity. The con- solidated entity recognises the fair value of the consideration received and the fair value of any investment retained together with any gain or loss in profit or loss. c. Segment Reporting Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision maker. The chief operating decision makers, who are responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of the operating segments, is the Board of Directors. d. Revenue and Other Income Recognition Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable and after taking into account any trade discounts and volume rebates allowed. Revenue from the sale of goods is recognised at the point of delivery as this cor- responds to the transfer of significant risks and rewards of ownership of the goods and the cessation of all involvement in those goods. Interest revenue is recognised using the effective interest rate method. Royalties determined on a time basis are recognised on a straight line basis over the period of the agreement. Government grants are recognised in profit or loss on a systematic basis over the periods in which the Group recognises as expenses the related costs for which the grants are intended to compensate, but not before the receipt of the grant is relatively certain. 38 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report e. Income Tax The income tax expense (revenue) for the period is the tax payable on the current period’s taxable income based on the national income tax rate for each jurisdiction adjusted by changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities attributable to tem- porary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the financial statements, and to unused tax losses. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the period when the asset is realised or the liability is settled and their measurement also reflects the manner in which management expects to recover or settle the carrying amount of the related asset or liability. Deferred tax assets relating to temporary differences and unused tax losses are recognised only to the extent that it is prob- able that future taxable profit will be available against which the benefits of the deferred tax asset can be utilised. Current tax assets and liabilities are offset where a legally enforceable right of set off exists and it is intended that net set- tlement or simultaneous realisation and settlement of the respective asset and liability will occur. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset where: (a) a legally enforceable right of set off exists; and (b) the deferred tax assets and liabilities relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority on either the same taxable entity or different taxable entities where it is intended that net settlement or simultaneous realisation and settlement of the respective asset and liability will occur in future periods in which significant amounts of deferred tax assets or liabilities are expected to be recovered or settled. f. Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, deposits available on demand with banks, other short term highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less, and bank overdrafts. Bank overdrafts are reported within short term borrowings in current liabilities in the consolidated statement of financial position. g. Trade and Other Receivables Receivables are recognised initially at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost, less provision for doubt- ful debts. Collectability of receivables is reviewed on an ongoing basis. Debts which are known to be uncollectible are written off. A provision for doubtful receivables is established when there is objective evidence that the Group will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the original terms of receivables. h. Inventories Inventories are measured at the lower of cost and net realisable value. The cost of manufactured products includes direct materials, direct labour and an appropriate portion of variable and fixed overheads. Overheads are applied on the basis of normal operating capacity. Costs are assigned on the basis of weighted average costs. Costs of purchased inventory are determined after deducting rebates and realisable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less the estimated costs of completion and the estimated cost necessary to make the sale. i. Plant and Equipment Plant and equipment are measured on the cost basis and therefore carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment. The cost of fixed assets constructed within the Group includes the cost of materials, direct labour, borrowing costs and an appropriate proportion of fixed and variable overheads. Subsequent costs are included in the asset’s carrying amount or recognised as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Group and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. All other repairs and maintenance are charged to the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income during the financial period in which they are incurred Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 39 notes to the financial statements Continued Depreciation The depreciable amount of all fixed assets is depreciated on a straight line basis over the asset’s useful life to the Group commencing from the time the asset is held ready for use. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of either the unexpired period of the lease or the estimated useful lives of the improvements. The depreciation rates used for each class of depreciable asset are : Class of Fixed Asset Furniture and fittings Office equipment Depreciation Rate 20% 6.7-33.33% The assets’ residual values and useful lives are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at the end of each reporting period. An asset’s carrying amount is written down immediately to its recoverable amount if the asset’s carrying amount is greater than its estimated recoverable amount. Gains and losses on disposals are determined by comparing proceeds with the carrying amount. These gains and losses are included in the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income. When revalued assets are sold, amounts included in the revaluation surplus relating to that asset are transferred to retained earnings. j. Investments and Other Financial Assets The Group classified its investments in the following categories: loans and receivables and available for sale financial assets. The classification depends on the nature and purpose of the investment and is determined at the time of initial recognition. (i) Loans and receivables Loans and receivables are non derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market and are subsequently measured at amortised cost. Loans and receivables are included in current assets, where they are expected to mature within 12 months after the end of the reporting period. Loan and receivables are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method, less any impairment. Interest income is recognised by applying the effective interest rate, except for short term receivables when the recognition of interest would be immaterial. k. Intangibles other than Goodwill Patents and trademarks Patents and trademarks are recognised at cost of acquisition. Patents and trademarks have a finite life and are carried at cost less any accumulated amortisation and any impairment losses. The Group has determined the useful life of the intan- gible assets at 20 years. There is no amortisation charge to the intangible assets in the 2013 financial year. Research and development Expenditure on research activities is recognised as an expense in the period in which is incurred. Expenditure on development projects (relating to the design and testing of new or improved products) are capitalised as intangible assets when it is probable that the project will be a success considering its commercial and technical feasibility and its costs can be measured reliably. The expenditure capitalised comprises all directly attributable costs, including costs of materials, services, direct labour and an appropriate proportion of overheads. Development expenditures that do not meet these criteria are recognised as an expense as incurred. Development costs previously recognised as an expense are not recognised as an asset in a subsequent period. 40 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report l. Impairment of Assets At the end of each reporting period, the Group assesses whether there is any indication that an asset may be impaired. The assessment will include the consideration of external and internal sources of information including dividends received from subsidiaries, associates or jointly controlled entities deemed to be out of pre acquisition profits. If such an indication exists, an impairment test is carried out on the asset by comparing the recoverable amount of the asset, being the higher of the asset’s fair value less costs to sell and value in use, to the asset’s carrying amount. Any excess of the asset’s carrying amount over its recoverable amount is recognised immediately in profit or loss, unless the asset is carried at a re-valued amount in accordance with another Standard (e.g. in accordance with the revaluation model in AASB 116). Any impairment loss of a re-valued asset is treated as a revaluation decrease in accordance with that other Standard. Where it is not possible to estimate the recoverable amount of an individual asset, the Group estimates the recoverable amount of the cash generating unit to which the asset belongs. Impairment testing is performed annually for goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives m. Trade and Other Payables These amounts represent liabilities for goods and services provided to the Group prior to the end of financial year which are unpaid. The amounts are unsecured and are usually paid within 30 days of recognition. n. Provisions Provisions are recognised when the Group has a legal or constructive obligation, as a result of past events, for which it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will result and that outflow can be reliably measured. Provisions are measured using the best estimate of the amounts required to settle the obligation at the end of the reporting period. o. Employee Benefits Provision is made for the Company’s liability for employee benefits arising from services rendered by employees to the end of the reporting period. Employee benefits that are expected to be settled within one year have been measured at the amounts expected to be paid when the liability is settled. In determining the liability, consideration is given to employee wage increases and the probability that the employee may satisfy vesting requirements. Short term employee benefits Liability for wages and salaries, including non monetary benefits, annual leave, long service leave and accumulating sick leave expected to be settled within 12 months of the reporting date are recognised in other payables in respect of employ- ees’ services up to the reporting date and are measured at the amounts expected to be paid when the liabilities are settled. Other long term employee benefits Liability for annual leave and long service leave is recognised in the provision for employee benefits and measured as the present value of expected future payments to be made in respect of services provided by employees up to the reporting date using the projected unit credit method. Consideration is given to expected future wage and salary levels, experience of employee departures and period of service. Retirement benefit obligations Contributions to the defined contribution fund are recognised as an expense as they become payable. Prepaid contribu- tions are recognised as an asset to the extent that a cash refund or a reduction in the future payment is available. Contribu- tions are paid into the fund nominated by the employee. Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 41 notes to the financial statements Continued Share based payments The fair value of options granted is recognised as a benefit expense with a corresponding increase in equity. The fair value is measured at grant date and recognised over the period during which the directors and executives become uncondition- ally entitled to the options. The fair value at grant date is determined using binomial option pricing model that takes into account the exercise price, the term of option, the impact of dilution, the share price at grant date and expected price volatility of the underlying share, the expected dividend yield and the risk free interest rate for the term of the option. The fair value of the options granted is adjusted to reflect market vesting conditions, but excludes the impact of any non- market vesting conditions. Non-market vesting conditions are included in assumptions about the number of options that are expected to become exercisable. The benefit expense recognised each period takes into account the most recent estimate. Upon the exercise of options, the balance of the share based payments reserve relating to those options is transferred to share capital and the proceeds received, net of any directly attributable transaction costs, are credited to share capital. p. Equity settled compensation The Group operates an employee share ownership plan. Share based payments to employees are measured at the fair value of the instruments issued and amortised over the vesting periods. Share based payments to non-employees are measured at the fair value of goods or services received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, if it is determined the fair value of the goods or services cannot be reliably measured, and are recorded at the date the goods or services are received. The corresponding amount is recorded to the option reserve. The fair value of options is determined using the binominal pricing model. The number of shares and options expected to vest is reviewed and adjusted at the end of each reporting period such that the amount recognised for services received as consideration for the equity instruments granted is based on the number of equity instruments that eventually vest. Upon the exercise of options, the balance of the share based payments reserve relating to those options is transferred to share capital and the proceeds received, net of any directly attributable transaction costs, are credited to share capital. q. Functional and Presentation Currency The functional currency of each of the Group’s entities is measured using the currency of the primary economic environ- ment in which that entity operates. The consolidated financial statements are presented in Australian dollars which is the parent entity’s functional and presentation currency. Foreign currency transactions Foreign currency transactions are translated into Australian dollars using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at financial year end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognised in profit or loss. Foreign operations The assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated into Australian dollars using the exchange rates at the reporting date. The revenues and expenses of foreign operations are translated into Australian dollars using the average exchange rates, which approximate the rate at the date of the transaction, for the period. All resulting foreign exchange differences are recognised in other comprehensive income through the foreign currency reserve in equity. The foreign currency reserve is recognised in profit or loss when the foreign operation or net investment is disposed. 42 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report r. Goods and Services Tax (GST) Revenue, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of goods and services tax (GST), except where the amount of GST incurred is not recoverable from the Australian Taxation Office (ATO). Receivables and payable are stated inclusive of GST receivable or payable. The net amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the ATO is included with other receivables or payables in the consolidated statement of financial position. Cash flows are presented on a gross basis. The GST components of cash flows arising from investing or financing activi- ties which are recoverable from, or payable to, the ATO are presented as operating cash flows included in receipts from customers or payments to suppliers s. Business Combinations The acquisition method of accounting is used to account for business combinations regardless of whether equity instru- ments or other assets are acquired. The consideration transferred is the sum of the acquisition date fair values of the assets transferred, equity instruments issued or liabilities incurred by the acquirer to former owners of the acquiree and the amount of any non-controlling inter- est in the acquiree. For each business combination, the non-controlling interest in the acquiree is measured at either fair value or at the proportionate share of the acquiree’s identifiable net assets. All acquisition costs are expensed as incurred to profit or loss. On the acquisition of a business, the Group assesses the financial assets acquired and liabilities assumed for appropriate classification and designation in accordance with the contractual terms, economic conditions, the Group’s operating or accounting policies and other pertinent conditions in existence at the acquisition date. Where the business combination is achieved in stages, the Group remeasures its previously held equity interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date fair value and the difference between the fair value and the previous carrying amount is recognised in profit or loss. Contingent consideration to be transferred by the acquirer is recognised at the acquisition date fair value. Subsequent changes in the fair value of contingent consideration classified as an asset or liability is recognised in profit or loss. Con- tingent consideration classified as equity is not remeasured and its subsequent settlement is accounted for within equity. The difference between the acquisition date fair value of assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any non-controlling inter- est in the acquiree and the fair value of the consideration transferred and the fair value of any pre-existing investment in the acquiree is recognised as goodwill. If the consideration transferred and the pre-existing fair value is less than the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired, being a bargain purchase to the acquirer, the difference is recognised as a gain directly in profit or loss by the acquirer on the acquisition date, but only after a reassessment of the identification and measurement of the net assets acquired, the non-controlling interest in the acquiree, if any, the consideration transferred and the acquirer’s previously held equity interest in the acquirer. Business combinations are initially accounted for on a provisional basis. The acquirer retrospectively adjusts the provisional amounts recognised and also recognises additional assets or liabilities during the measurement period, based on new information obtained about the facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date. The measurement period ends on either the earlier of (i) 12 months from the date of the acquisition or (ii) when the acquirer receives all the information possible to determine fair value. Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 43 notes to the financial statements Continued t. Earnings per share Basic earnings per share Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the profit attributable to owners of Cellmid Limited, excluding any costs of servicing equity other than ordinary shares, by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the financial year, adjusted for bonus elements in ordinary shares issued during the financial year. Diluted earnings per share Diluted earnings per share adjusts the figures used in the determination of basic earnings per share to take into account the after income tax effect of interest and other financing costs associated with dilutive potential ordinary shares and the weighted average number of shares assumed to have been issued for no consideration in relation to dilutive potential ordinary shares. u. Comparative Figures When required by Accounting Standards, comparative figures have been adjusted to conform to changes in presentation for the current financial year. Where the group has retrospectively applied an accounting policy, made a retrospective restatement of items in the financial statements or reclassified items in its financial statements, an additional statement of financial position as at the beginning of the earliest comparative period will be disclosed. v. New Accounting Standards for Application in Future Periods Australian Accounting Standards and Interpretations that have recently been issued or amended but are not yet mandatory, have not been early adopted by the consolidated entity for the annual reporting period ended 30 June 2014. The consolidated entity’s assessment of the impact of these new or amended Accounting Standards and Interpretations, most relevant to the consolidated entity, are set out below. - AASB 2 Share-Based Payment This standard and its consequential amendments are applicable to annual reporting periods for which Share-based payment transactions for grant dates on or after 1 July 2014. There will be no impact on these financial statements when these amendments are first adopted as they apply prospectively to share-based payment transactions for which the grant date is on or after 1 July 2014. - AASB 8 Operating Segments This standard and its consequential amendments are applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 July 2014. There will be no impact on the financial statements when these amendments are first adopted because this is a disclosure standard only. Further, because the Group does not currently aggregate operating segments in determining reportable segments, it is unlikely that any additional disclosures will be required when this amendment is adopted for the first time for the year ended 30 June 2015. - AASB 124 Related Party Disclosures This standard and its consequential amendments are applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 July 2014. The amendment clarifies that an entity that provides key management personnel services (‘management entity’) to a reporting entity (or to the parent of the reporting entity), is a related party of the reporting entity. The amend- ment also requires separate disclosure of amounts recognised as an expense for key management personnel services provided by a separate management entity (but not in the categories set out in AASB 124.17) There will be no impact on these financial statements when these amendments are first adopted because this is a disclosure standard only. As the group does not currently engage the services of a management entity, it is also unlikely that any additional disclo- sures will be required when this amendment is adopted for the first time for the year ended 30 June 2015. 44 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report - AASB 9 Financial Instruments and its consequential amendments This standard and its consequential amendments are applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2017 and completes phases I and III of the IASB’s project to replace IAS 39 (AASB 139) ‘Financial Instru- ments: Recognition and Measurement’. This standard introduces new classification and measurement models for financial assets, using a single approach to determine whether a financial asset is measured at amortised cost or fair value. The accounting for financial liabilities continues to be classified and measured in accordance with AASB 139, with one exception, being that the portion of a change of fair value relating to the entity’s own credit risk is to be pre- sented in other comprehensive income unless it would create an accounting mismatch. Chapter 6 ‘Hedge Accounting’ supersedes the general hedge accounting requirements in AASB 139 and provides a new simpler approach to hedge accounting that is intended to more closely align with risk management activities undertaken by entities when hedging financial and non-financial risks. The consolidated entity will adopt this standard and the amendments from 1 July 2017 but the impact of its adoption is yet to be assessed by the consolidated entity. - AASB 2013-3 Amendments to AASB 136 - Recoverable Amount Disclosures for Non-Financial Assets These amendments are applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2014. The disclosure requirements of AASB 136 ‘Impairment of Assets’ have been enhanced to require additional information about the fair value measurement when the recoverable amount of impaired assets is based on fair value less costs of disposals. Additionally, if measured using a present value technique, the discount rate is required to be disclosed. The adoption of these amendments from 1 July 2014 may increase the disclosures by the consolidated entity. Annual Improvements to IFRSs 2010-2012 Cycle These amendments are applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 July 2014 and affects several Accounting Standards as follows: Amends the definition of ‘vesting conditions’ and ‘market condition’ and adds defini- tions for ‘performance condition’ and ‘service condition’ in AASB 2 ‘Share-based Payment’; Amends AASB 3 ‘Business Combinations’ to clarify that contingent consideration that is classified as an asset or liability shall be measured at fair value at each reporting date; Amends AASB 8 ‘Operating Segments’ to require entities to disclose the judgements made by management in applying the aggregation criteria; Clarifies that AASB 8 only requires a reconciliation of the total reportable segments assets to the entity’s assets, if the segment assets are reported regularly; Clarifies that the issuance of AASB 13 ‘Fair Value Measurement’ and the amending of AASB 139 ‘Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement’ and AASB 9 ‘Financial Instruments’ did not remove the ability to measure short-term receivables and payables with no stated interest rate at their invoice amount, if the effect of discounting is immaterial; Clarifies that in AASB 116 ‘Property, Plant and Equipment’ and AASB 138 ‘Intangible Assets’, when an asset is revalued the gross carrying amount is adjusted in a manner that is consistent with the revaluation of the carrying amount (i.e. proportional restatement of accumulated amor- tisation); and Amends AASB 124 ‘Related Party Disclosures’ to clarify that an entity providing key management personnel services to the reporting entity or to the parent of the reporting entity is a ‘related party’ of the reporting entity. The adoption of these amendments from 1 July 2014 will not have a material impact on the consolidated entity. Annual Improvements to IFRSs 2011-2013 Cycle These amendments are applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 July 2014 and affects four Accounting Standards as follows: Clarifies the ‘meaning of effective IFRSs’ in AASB 1 ‘First-time Adoption of Australian Accounting Standards’; Clarifies that AASB 3 ‘Business Combination’ excludes from its scope the accounting for the formation of a joint arrangement in the financial statements of the joint arrangement itself; Clarifies that the scope of the portfolio exemption in AASB 13 ‘Fair Value Measurement’ includes all contracts accounted for within the scope of AASB 139 ‘Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement’ or AASB 9 ‘Financial Instruments’, regardless of whether they meet the definitions of financial assets or financial liabilities as defined in AASB 132 ‘Financial Instruments: Presentation’; and Clarifies that determining whether a specific transaction meets the definition of both a business combination as defined in AASB 3 ‘Business Combinations’ and investment property as defined in AASB 140 ‘Investment Property’ requires the separate application of both standards independently of each other. The adoption of these amendments from 1 July 2014 will not have a material impact on the consolidated entity. Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 45 notes to the financial statements Continued w. Critical accounting estimates and judgements Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that may have a financial impact on the entity and that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The preparation of the financial statements requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the financial statements. Management continually evaluates its judgements and estimates in relation to assets, liabilities, contingent liabilities, revenue and expenses. Management bases its judgements, estimates and assumptions on historical experience and on other various factors, including expectations of future events, management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. The resulting accounting judgements and estimates will seldom equal the related actual results. The judgements, estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities (refer to the respective notes) within the next financial year are discussed below. Estimated impairment of intellectual property The Group tests annually whether intellectual property has suffered any impairment, in accordance with the accounting policy stated in note 1. The recoverable amounts of the intellectual property have been determined based on reviewing the status of the research and development program, progress on its patent applications and projected cash flow calculations. These calculations require the use of assumptions, including estimating timing of cash flows, product development and availability of resources to exploit the assets. x. Correction of prior period error The acquisition of the remaining non-controlling interest in Advangen International Pty Limited as discussed in note 19 occurred on 25th November 2013. This transaction was incorrectly recorded and disclosed in the Interim Financial Report for the period ended 31 December 2013. The transaction has been retrospectively adjusted in the financial records of the Group. The impact of the adjustment to correct the error is noted in the below table: NON-CURRENT ASSETS Goodwill EQUITY Acquisition reserve As stated in 31 December 2013 interim report Adjustment Restated per 30 June 2014 report $ $ 154,796 (154,796) $ - - (154,796) (154,796) As the transaction occurred during the period 31 December 2013, no adjustment is necessary to the comparative balances stated in the 30 June 2014 financial report. 46 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report NOTE 2: PARENT INFORMATION The following information has been extracted from the books and records of the parent, Cellmid Limited and Controlled Entities and has been prepared in accordance with Accounting Standards. The financial information for the parent entity, Cellmid Limited and Controlled Entities has been prepared on the same basis as the consolidated financial statements except as disclosed below. Investments in subsidiaries Investments in subsidiaries are accounted for at cost in the financial statements of the parent entity. Dividends received from associates are recognised in the parent entity profit or loss, rather than being deducted from the carrying amount of these investments. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION ASSETS Current assets Non-current assets TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES Current liabilities Non-current liabilities TOTAL LIABILITIES EQUITY Contributed equity Accumulated losses Share based payment reserve TOTAL EQUITY STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME Loss of the parent entity Total comprehensive income 2014 $ 2013 $ 4,813,472 3,047,883 7,861,355 2,500,986 3,777,714 6,278,700 (579,055) (61,262) (640,317) 480,084 52,508 532,592 27,401,832 25,336,522 (21,982,582) (21,317,677) 1,801,788 7,221,038 1,727,263 5,746,108 664,905 664,905 1,173,677 1,173,677 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 47 notes to the financial statements Continued NOTE 3: REVENUE AND OTHER INCOME Consolidated Group 2014 $ 2013 $ 1,150,931 541,649 52,054 1,009,188 26,220 36,494 1,123,956 2,274,887 91,542 429,519 521,061 30,833 358 24,000 406 55,597 597,246 115,167 48,875 164,042 Consolidated Group 2014 $ 2013 $ (333,085) (2,511) (82,138) (28,926) (179,986) (112,140) (722,882) (84,606) (1,124) (71,879) 13,338 (95,842) (16,634) (475,361) Revenue from continuing operations Sales revenue: – sale of goods Other revenue: – interest received – licence fees and royalties – rental revenue – other revenue Total Revenue Other income: – Government grants – Gain on disposal of financial asset Total other income NOTE 4: LOSS FOR THE YEAR Loss before income tax from continuing operations includes the following specific expenses: Cost of sales Finance costs Defined contribution superannuation expenses (Loss)/Gain on foreign exchange Minimum lease payments Depreciation and amortisation expense Research and development expenses 48 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report NOTE 5: INCOME TAx a. The major components of income tax benefit comprise: – Income tax benefit Consolidated Group 2014 $ 2013 $ 747,106 747,106 785,866 785,866 b. Numerical reconciliation of income tax benefit to accounting loss: Loss for year before income tax benefit (2,227,942) (2,327,173) Prima facie tax benefit on loss from ordinary activities before income tax at 31.11% (30.0% in 2013)1 Add / (less) tax effect of: – Share based payment – Sundry items – Research and development expenditure – Research and development core technology expenditure (692,936) (698,152) 40,057 32,445 669,972 (190,438) 1,210 6,406 396,695 (190,438) Tax losses not brought to account 147,826 484,279 Adjusted income tax expense (6,926) - Less: research and development tax benefit for the financial year2 754,032 785,866 Income tax benefit 747,106 785,866 1. The Group operates across two tax jurisdictions being Australia and Japan each with difference corporate tax rates. The applied tax rate of 31.11% represents the average tax rate applicable to the Group for the financial year ended 30 June 2014. 2. A $754,032 ($785,866 in 2013) research and development tax offset was received for a claim in accordance with the Commonwealth Government’s Research and Development Tax Incentive. Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 49 notes to the financial statements Continued (c) Unused tax losses Movements in unused tax losses Carried forward unused tax losses at the beginning of the financial year Current unused tax losses for which no deferred tax asset has been recognised Tax losses applied to net taxable income for the period Prior period differences between tax calculation and income tax return Carried forward unused tax losses at the end of the financial year Notional tax rate Potential future tax benefit This income tax benefit arising from tax losses will only be realised if: Australia $ Japan $ Total $ 13,467,581 1,566,188 15,033,769 - 435,350 435,350 (47,754) (416,139) - - (47,754) (416,139) 13,003,688 2,001,538 15,005,226 30.00% 3,901,106 35.64% 713,348 4,614,454 i. ii. iii. the Group derives future assessable income of a nature and of an amount sufficient to enable the Group to ben- efit from the deductions for the losses to be realised; the Group continues to comply with the conditions for deductibility imposed by tax legislation; and no changes in tax legislation adversely affect the Group in realising the benefit from the deductions for the losses. 50 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report NOTE 6: BUSINESS COMBINATIONS On 24 May 2013 Cellmid Limited acquired 100% of the ordinary share shares of Advangen Incorporated (Japanese enti- ty) for the total consideration transferred of JPY ¥285,171,564. This has been translated to AUD $2,893,968 using the exchange rate per the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) on 24 May 2013. The following table shows the assets acquired, liabilities assumed and the purchase consideration at the acquisition date. Book value Fair value Exchange rate Fair value ¥JPY ¥JPY 41,182,636 41,182,636 19,594,272 19,594,272 31,742,886 31,742,886 2,850,035 2,850,035 848,292 848,292 - 198,099,144 (9,145,701) (9,145,701) 87,072,420 285,171,564 98.54 98.54 98.54 98.54 98.54 98.54 98.54 - - - 285,171,564 Assets or liabilities acquired: Cash Trade receivables Inventories Other assets Plant and equipment Intangible assets Trade payables Net identifiable assets acquired Goodwill Acquisition date fair value of the total consideration transferred Representing: - Cash - Fair value of issued shares Cash used to acquire business, net of cash acquired: Cash to acquire subsidiary Less: cash and cash equivalents on acquisition Net cash used $AU 417,928 198,846 322,132 28,923 8,609 2,010,342 (92,812) 2,893,968 - 2,893,968 1,221,839 1,672,129 2,893,968 1,221,839 417,928 803,911 The contribution to profit or loss and other income of Advangen Incorporated for the year can be found in Note 25. Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 51 notes to the financial statements Continued NOTE 7: INTERESTS OF KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL (KMP) a. Directors and key management personnel The following persons were directors or key management personnel of Cellmid Limited during the financial year: David King (Chairman) - appointed from 18 January 2008 to current Ms Maria Halasz (Chief Executive Officer) - appointed from 19 November 2007 to current Mr Graeme Kaufman (Non executive) - appointed from 27 August 2012 to current Mr Martin Rogers (Non executive) - appointed from 19 September 2012 to current Mr Nicholas Falzon (Secretary and Financial Controller) - appointed from 6 October 2010 to current b. Directors and key management personnel compensation Refer to the remuneration Report contained in the Directors’ Report for details of the remuneration paid or payable to each member of the Group’s key management personnel for the year ended 30 June 2014. The totals of remuneration paid to KMP of the Company and the Group during the year are as follows: Short term employment benefits Post employment benefits Share-based payments NOTE 8: AUDITOR’S REMUNERATION 2014 $ 582,804 37,197 52,047 672,048 2013 $ 536,887 44,915 - 581,802 During the year the following fees were paid or payable for services provided by the auditor of the parent entity, its related practices and a non-related audit firm: Auditing or review of the financial statements - BDO East Coast Partnership -Australia - BDO Toyo & Co - Japan 52,500 10,479 62,979 54,900 10,200 65,100 52 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report NOTE 9: EARNINGS PER SHARE Basic and diluted earnings per share (in cents) 2014 $ (0.21) 2013 $ (0.27) a. Reconciliation of earnings to profit or loss from continuing operations Loss for the year (1,473,815) (1,541,307) b. Weighted average number of shares used as the denominator Weighted average number of ordinary shares used in calculating dilutive EPS 696,596,038 563,832,659 No. No. Options 315,656,738 options granted to executives and directors (2013: 354,105,173) are considered to be potential ordinary shares and have been included in the determination of diluted earnings per share to the extent to which they are dilutive. In the year ended 30 June 2014, these options were in fact anti-dilutive, and consequently diluted earnings per share is the same as basic earnings per share. The options have not been included in the determination of basic earnings per share. Details relating to options are set out in Note 18. NOTE 10: CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS Cash at bank and in hand Short term bank deposits 2,495,778 1,754,994 5,975 - 2,501,753 1,754,994 The effective interest rate on short term bank deposits was 3.5-4.5% ( 2013: 3.5-4.5%); these deposits were all on call. Reconciliation of cash Cash and Cash equivalents reported in the consolidated statement of cash flows are reconciled to the equivalent items in the consolidated statement of financial position as follows: Cash and cash equivalents 2,501,753 1,754,994 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 53 notes to the financial statements Continued NOTE 11: TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES CURRENT Trade receivables Other receivables Effective interest rates and credit risk 2014 $ 177,787 42,684 220,471 2013 $ 41,123 214,572 255,695 The Group has no significant concentration of credit risk with respect to any single counterparty or group of counterparties other than those receivables specifically provided for and mentioned within Note 23(a). The class of assets described as ‘trade and other receivables” is considered to be the main source of credit risk related to the group. There is no interest rate risk for the balances of trade and other receivables. There is no material credit risk associated with other receivables. No receivables are past due or impaired. 2014 $ 2013 $ 1,019,368 643,009 46,988 1,022,708 672,218 - 1,709,365 1,694,926 362,806 (319,537) 43,269 366,065 (314,432) 51,633 NOTE 12: INVENTORIES CURRENT Midkine Finished goods Raw materials NOTE 13: PLANT & EQUIPMENT PLANT AND EQUIPMENT At cost Accumulated depreciation 54 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report a. Movements in carrying amounts of plant and equipment Balance at 1 July 2013 Additions Depreciation Balance at 30 June 2014 Balance at 1 July 2012 Additions through business combinations Additions Depreciation expense Balance at 30 June 2013 NOTE 14: INTANGIBLE ASSETS PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS At cost Accumulated amortisation a. Movements in carrying amounts of intangible assets Balance at 1 July 2013 Additions - Amortisation Foreign exchange movements Balance at 30 June 2014 Balance at 1 July 2012 Additions Foreign exchange movements Balance at 30 June 2013 Plant and Equipment $ 51,633 3,259 (11,623) 43,269 32,276 8,609 27,382 (16,634) 51,633 Total $ 51,633 3,259 (11,623) 43,269 32,276 8,609 27,382 (16,634) 51,633 2014 $ 2013 $ 2,011,782 (100,517) 1,911,265 2,163,150 - 2,163,150 Patents & Trademarks $ Total $ 2,163,150 2,163,150 - (100,517) (151,368) - (100,517) (152,808) 1,911,265 1,909,825 1,440 1,440 2,010,342 2,010,342 151,368 151,368 2,163,150 2,163,150 Intangible assets, other than goodwill, have finite useful lives. The Group has determined the useful life of the intangible asset at 20 years. There is no amortisation charge to the intangible assets in the 2013 financial year. Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 55 notes to the financial statements Continued 2014 $ 2013 $ 68,302 73,321 293,378 1,340 268,465 563,183 271,936 - 229,363 501,299 Employee Benefits Annual Leave Long Service Leave $ 134,755 31,449 166,254 2014 $ 166,254 61,262 227,516 $ 52,508 8,754 61,262 2013 $ 134,755 52,508 187,263 NOTE 15: OTHER ASSETS CURRENT Prepayments NOTE 16: TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES CURRENT Trade payables GST payable Other payables NOTE 17: PROVISIONS Balance at 1 July 2013 Additional provisions Provision for employee benefits Analysis of total provisions Current Non-current Provision for employee benefits 56 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report NOTE 18: CONTRIBUTED EQUITY 735,585,702 (2013: 650,470,079) Ordinary shares 315,656,738 (2013: 354,105,173) Options 2014 $ 2013 $ 26,769,571 24,704,261 632,261 632,261 27,401,832 25,336,522 a. Ordinary shares At the beginning of the year Shares issued - July 2012 Shares issued - March 2013 Shares issued - May 2013 Escrowed shares - November 20131 Shares issued - November 20132 Shares issued - December 2013 Shares issued - December 2013 Shares issued - February 2014 Shares issue costs, net of tax At the end of the year Issue price $ 2014 No. 2013 No. 2014 No. 2013 No. 650,470,079 520,843,117 24,704,261 20,741,843 0.0165 0.0400 0.0400 0.0300 0.0340 0.0300 0.0150 0.0400 - - - 24,242,424 49,646,914 55,737,624 12,000,000 3,515,625 66,666,666 2,333,332 600,000 - - - - - - - - - - - 119,531 2,000,000 35,000 24,000 400,000 1,985,877 1,672,129 - - - - - (113,221) (97,588) 735,585,702 650,470,079 26,769,571 24,704,261 1. 12,000,000 shares were issued to Maria Halasz on 25 November 2013 under a limited recourse loan arrange- ment. The shares were held in escrow and unpaid at 30 June 2014 (2013: nil). All other shares are fully paid. 2. On 25 November 2013, Cellmid Limited acquired the remaining 5% interest in its subsidiary, Advangen Inter- national Pty Ltd, from Direct Capital Group Pty Limited (a controlled entity of Maria Halasz) and related party of Cellmid Limited. Consideration of 3,515,625 shares in Cellmid Limited, with a market value of $119,531 was provided for the acquisition. The carrying value of the non-controlling interest as at the date of acquisition was a net liability position $35,265. Therefore the transaction resulted in an adjustment to the acquisition reserve of $154,796. Refer to Note 22: Related Party Transactions. The holders of ordinary shares are entitled to participate in dividends and the proceeds on winding up of the Company. On a show of hands at meetings of the Company, each holder of ordinary shares has one vote in person or by proxy, and upon a poll each share is entitled to one vote. The Company does not have authorised capital or par value in respect of its shares. Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 57 notes to the financial statements Continued b. Options (i) For information relating to the Cellmid Limited and controlled entities employee option plan, including details of options issued, exercised and lapsed during the financial year and the options outstanding at year end, refer to Note 28 Share based payments. (ii) For information relating to share options issued to key management personnel during the financial year, refer to the remuneration report. At the beginning of the year Options issued - August 2013 Options issued - October 2013 Options issued - November 2013 Options issued - December 2013 Options issued - March 2014 Options issued - April 2014 Options lapsed - April 2014 Options lapsed - July 2013 Options lapsed - March 2014 Options lapsed - April 2014 At the end of the year (c) Capital Risk Management 2014 No. 2013 No. 354,105,173 36,923,968 - - - - - - - (3,000,000) (27,198,435) (8,250,000) 1,440,000 262,542,770 3,000,000 25,000,000 26,573,435 625,000 (2,000,000) - - - 315,656,738 354,105,173 The Group’s objectives when managing capital are to safeguard its ability to continue as a going concern, so that it can provide returns for shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders and to maintain an optimum capital structure to reduce the cost of capital. In order to maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Group may adjust the amount of dividends paid to shareholders, return capital to shareholders, issue new shares or sell assets to reduce debt. The Group look to raise capital when an opportunity to invest in a business or company is seen as value adding relative to the current parent entity’s share price at the time of the investment. The Group is not actively pursuing additional invest- ments in the short term as it continues to integrate and grow its existing businesses in order to maximise synergies. 58 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report NOTE 19: RESERVES Share based payment reserve Balance the beginning of the year Share based payment expense 2014 $ 2013 $ 1,727,263 1,723,230 74,524 4,033 Balance at the end of the year 1,801,787 1,727,263 Acquisition reserve Balance the beginning of the year Acquisition of non-controlling interests in Advangen International Pty Ltd Balance at the end of the year General reserve Balance the beginning of the year Net movement as a result of shares issued to minority interest Balance at the end of the year Foreign exchange reserve Balance the beginning of the year Foreign exchange movements Balance at the end of the year Total reserves a. Foreign currency translation reserve - (154,796) (154,796) 22,855 - 22,855 216,257 (180,898) 35,359 - - - 22,855 - 22,855 - 216,257 216,257 1,705,205 1,966,375 Exchange differences arising on translation of the foreign controlled entity are recognised in other comprehensive income foreign currency translation reserve. The cumulative amount is reclassified to profit or loss when the net investment is disposed. b. General reserve The general reserve records funds set aside for future expansion of the Group. c. Share based payments reserve This reserve records the cumulative value of employee services received for the issue of share options. When the option is exercised the amount in the share option reserve is transferred to share capital. d. Acquisition reserve On 25 November 2013, Cellmid Limited acquired the remaining 5% interest in its subsidiary, Advangen International Pty Ltd, from Direct Capital Group Pty Limited (a controlled entity of Maria Halasz) and related party of Cellmid Limited. Con- sideration of 3,515,625 shares in Cellmid Limited, with a market value of $119,531 was provided for the acquisition. The carrying value of the non-controlling interest as at the date of acquisition was a net liability position $35,265. Therefore the transaction resulted in an adjustment to the acquisition reserve of $154,796. Refer to Note 22: Related Party Transactions. Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 59 notes to the financial statements Continued NOTE 20: CASH FLOW INFORMATION a. Reconciliation of Cash Flow from Operations with Loss after Income Tax Loss for the year Non cash flows in loss: - depreciation and amortisation - licence revenue - share base payment - bad and doubtful debt - gain on sale of financial asset - foreign exchange loss Changes in assets and liabilities, net of the effects of purchase of subsidiaries: - (increase)/decrease in trade and other receivables - (increase)/decrease in prepayments - (increase)/decrease in inventories - increase/(decrease) in trade and other payables - increase/(decrease) in provisions Cash flow from operations 2014 $ 2013 $ (1,480,836) (1,541,307) 112,140 (570,741) 133,523 - (429,519) (132,313) 35,224 5,019 (14,439) 61,884 40,253 16,634 - 4,033 1,227 (48,875) - 22,890 (11,583) (59,303) 146,453 17,063 (2,239,805) (1,452,768) NOTE 21: EVENTS AFTER THE REPORTING PERIOD No matters or circumstances have arisen since the end of the financial year which significantly affected or could significantly affect the operations of the Group, the results of those operations, or the state of affairs of the Group in future financial years. NOTE 22: RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS a. The Group’s main related parties are as follows: Parent entities: Cellmid Limited is the ultimate parent entity. Subsidiaries: For details of disclosures relating to subsidiaries, refer to Note 24: Interests in Subsidiaries. Transactions and balances between subsidiaries and the parent have been eliminated on consolidation of the group. Key management Personnel: For details of disclosures relating to key management personnel, refer to Note 7: Interests of Key Management Personnel (KMP) and the remuneration report within the Directors’, report. b. Transactions with related parties On the 25 November 2013, Cellmid Limited acquired the remaining 5% interest in its subsidiary, Advangen International Pty Ltd, from Direct Capital Group Pty Limited a controlled entity of Maria Halasz, a Director of the company. Consideration of 3,515,625 Cellmid Limited shares, with a market value of $119,531 was provided for the acquisition. There were no other related party transactions during the year ended 30 June 2014. 60 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report NOTE 23: FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT The Group’s activities expose it to a number of financial risks as described below. The Group’s overall risk management program seeks to minimise potential adverse effects on the financial performance of the Group. To date, the group has not had the need to utilise derivative financial instruments such as foreign exchange contracts or interest rate swaps to manage any risk exposures identified. The totals for each category of financial instruments, measured in accordance with AASB 139 as detailed in the accounting policies to these financial statements, are as follows: Financial Assets Cash and cash equivalents Trade and other receivables Total financial assets Financial Liabilities Financial liabilities at amortised cost Trade and other payables Note 10 11 2014 $ 2013 $ 2,501,753 220,471 1,754,994 255,695 2,722,224 2,010,689 16 563,183 501,299 Total financial liabilities 563,183 501,299 The fair value of financial assets and liabilities equate to the carrying value. a. Credit risk Credit risk is managed on a Group basis. The group has no significant concentration of credit risk. The maximum exposure to credit risk by class of recognised financial assets at the end of the reporting period is equivalent to the carrying value and classification of those financial assets (net of any provisions) as presented in the table above. Trade and other receivables that are neither past due nor impaired are considered to be of high credit quality. Credit risk related to balances with banks and other financial institutions is managed by management in accordance with approved board policy. Such policy requires that surplus funds are only invested with counterparties with a Standard & Poor’s rating of at least AA . b. Liquidity risk The Group manages this risk through the following mechanisms: — preparing forward looking cash flow analysis in relation to its operational, investing and financing activities; — managing credit risk related to financial assets; and — only investing surplus cash with major financial institutions. The Group is not exposed to any material liquidity risk. Financial liabilities consist only of trade and other payables for which the contractual maturity dates are within 6 months of the reporting date. Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 61 notes to the financial statements Continued c. Market risk Foreign exchange risk Exposure to foreign exchange risk may result in the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument fluctuating due to movement in foreign exchange rates of currencies in which the Group holds financial instruments which are other than the AUD functional currency of the Group. The maximum exposure to foreign exchange risk is the fluctuation in the US dollar on its USD and JPY denominated bank accounts and also the profit and net assets of the Japanese subsidiary, Advangen Incorporated. The Company has performed a sensitivity analysis relating to its exposure to foreign currency risk at the end of the finan- cial year. The sensitivity analysis demonstrates the effect on the current year results and equity which could result from a change in this risk. At the end of the financial year, the effect on profit and equity as a result of changes in the foreign exchange rate with all other variables remaining constant would be as follows: Year ended 30 June 2014 +/- 1% in foreign exchange rates Year ended 30 June 2013 +/- 1% in foreign exchange rates Interest rate risk Profit $ Equity $ +/- 2,707 -/+ 938 +/- 739 +/- 9,110 The Group’s main interest rate risk arises from deposits with banks and other financial institutions. Deposits made at vari- able rates expose the Group to interest rate risk. Management maintains approximately 100% of deposits with banks at call on variable interest rates. The Company has performed a sensitivity analysis relating to its exposure to interest rate risk at the end of the financial year. The sensitivity analysis demonstrates the effect on the current year results and equity which could result from a change in this risk. At the end of the financial year, the effect on profit and equity as a result of changes in the interest rate with all other variables remaining constant would be as follows: Year ended 30 June 2014 +/- 1% in interest rates Year ended 30 June 2013 +/- 1% in interest rates Price risk The Group is not exposed to any material price risk. Profit $ Equity $ +/- 25,018 +/- 25,018 +/- 17,550 +/- 17,550 62 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report NOTE 24: INTERESTS IN SUBSIDIARIES The consolidated financial statements incorporate the assets, liabilities and results of the following wholly-owned subsidiar- ies in accordance with the accounting policy described in Note 1: Name Subsidiaries of Cellmid Limited: Advangen International Pty Limited1 Advangen Limited Advangen Incorporated Country of Incorporation Australia Australia Japan Percentage Owned (%) 2014 Percentage Owned (%) 2013 100 100 100 95 100 100 1. On 25 November 2013, Cellmid Limited acquired the remaining 5% interest in its subsidiary, Advangen Inter- national Pty Ltd, from Direct Capital Group Pty Limited (a controlled entity of Maria Halasz) and related party of Cellmid Limited. Refer to Note 22: Related Party Transactions. NOTE 25: SEGMENT INFORMATION Identification of reporting segments The Group is organised into two operating segments: (1) research and development of diagnostics and therapeutics and (2) research, development and marketing of hair growth products. These operating segments are based on the internal reports that are reviewed and used by the Board of Directors (identified as the Chief Operating Decision Makers (CODM)) in assessing performance and in determining the allocation of resources. There is no aggregation of operating segments. The CODM reviews both adjusted earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (segment result) and profit before income tax. Types of products and services The principal products and services of each of these operating segments are as follows: Research of Diagnostics and Therapeutics (Biotechnology) - research and development, marketing and promotional activities; - diagnostics and therapeutics for cancer and inflammatory conditions; and Research, development and marketing of hair growth products (Retailing) - hair growth products. Geographical segment information The primary geographic segment within which the Group operates is Australia as at 30 June 2014. For primary reporting purposes, the Group operates in two geographic segment as described as at 30 June 2014. Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 63 notes to the financial statements Continued Major customers During the year ended 30 June 2014 approximately 49% of the Group’s external revenue was derived from sales to Frost- bland Pty Ltd (4%) through the retailing segment, and Pacific Edge Biotechnology Limited (25%) and Fujikura Kasei Co Limited (20%) through the biotechnology segments. Biotechnology Australia Retailing Australia Retailing Japan Total 2014 $ 2013 $ 2014 $ 2013 $ 2014 $ 2013 $ 2014 $ 2013 $ 64,300 64,300 52,014 1,009,188 26,220 19,900 215,279 271,257 311,098 815,374 15,272 1,150,931 541,649 215,279 271,257 311,098 815,374 15,272 1,150,931 541,649 30,833 358 24,000 - - - - - - 40 - - - 10,988 398 5,596 - - - 8 52,054 30,833 1,009,188 26,220 36,494 358 24,000 406 1,171,622 270,470 282,255 311,496 821,010 15,280 2,274,887 712,413 Revenue Sales of products Total sales revenue Interest received Royalties Rental revenue Other revenue Total Revenue Other income Government grant received 91,542 115,167 Gain on disposal of financial assets 429,519 48,875 - - - - - - - - 91,542 115,167 429,519 48,875 Expenses (2,917,117) (2,374,994) (606,005) (576,661) (1,252,594) (115,015) (4,775,716) (3,066,670) Share - based compensation (133,523) (4,032) Depreciation and amortisation Finance costs (7,562) (2,501) (13,919) (1,110) - (271) (10) - - - (133,523) (4,032) (156) (104,307) (2,560) (112,140) (16,635) (14) - - (2,511) (1,124) Loss before income tax (1,368,020) (1,959,543) (324,031) (265,335) (535,891) (102,296) (2,227,942) (2,327,173) Income tax benefit Loss after income tax benefit Assets Segment assets Total assets Liabilities Segment liabilities Total liabilities 747,106 785,866 (1,480,836) (1,541,307) 3,621,544 2,545,805 368,379 369,363 2,464,502 3,078,551 6,454,425 5,993,719 6,454,425 5,993,719 (640,317) (532,592) (87,287) (79,483) (63,095) (76,487) (790,699) (688,562) (790,699) (688,562) NOTE 26: COMMITMENTS Lease commitments - operating Committed at the reporting date but not recognised as liabilities, payable: Within one year One to five years Minimum lease payments 2014 $ 157,069 490,655 647,724 2013 $ 174,039 554,061 728,100 Operating lease commitments includes contracted amounts for office space under non-cancellable operating lease expir- ing within five years with no option to extend. 64 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report NOTE 27: CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND CONTINGENT ASSETS The Company and Group had no contingent liabilities or contingent assets at 30 June 2014 (nil at 30 June 2013). NOTE 28: SHARE BASED PAYMENTS At 30 June 2014 the Group has the following share based payment schemes: (i) The Cellmid Limited and Controlled Entities Employee Incentive Plan is designed as an incentive for eligible employees of the Group. Under the plan, participants are granted options which only vest if certain conditions are met. A summary of the Company options granted under the plan is as follows: Expiry Date 23/10/2016 3/07/2013 19/03/2014 1/06/2014 1/07/2014 20/11/2014 20/11/2014 19/02/2015 15/11/2015 15/11/2016 15/06/2017 14/08/2017 Exercise price Balance at start of the year Granted Exercised 0.034 0.057 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.056 0.035 0.062 0.100 0.030 0.032 0.034 290,542,770 3,000,000 27,198,435 8,250,000 5,002,006 7,000,000 2,000,000 600,000 100,000 3,971,962 5,000,000 1,440,000 354,105,173 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Forfeited/ expired Balance at the end of the year - 290,542,770 (3,000,000) (27,198,435) (8,250,000) - - - - - - - - - - - 5,002,006 7,000,000 2,000,000 600,000 100,000 3,971,962 5,000,000 1,440,000 (38,448,435) 315,656,738 The weighted average share price during the financial year was $0.030 ($0.022 in 2013). The weighted average remaining contractual life of the options outstanding at the end of the financial year was 2.24 years (1.96 years in 2013). For options granted in the current year financial year, the valuation model inputs used to determine the fair value at the grant date were as follows: Grant Date Expiry Date Share price at grant date Exercise price Expected volatility Dividend yield Risk-free interest rate Fair value at grant date 25/11/2013 25/11/2016 0.030 0.030 95.58% 0% 3.08% 0.0183 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 65 notes to the financial statements Continued NOTE 29: COMPANY DETAILS The registered office of the Company is: Suite 1802, Level 18 15 Castlereagh Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia The principal places of business are: Cellmid Limited Suite 1802, Level 18 15 Castlereagh Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia Advangen International Pty Limited Suite 1802, Level 18 15 Castlereagh Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia Advangen Incorporated Chiba Industry Advancement Centre Tokatsu Techno Plaza 5 4 6 Kashiwanoha Kashiwa Chiba 277-0082 Japan 66 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 67 68 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report Directors’ Declaration DIRECTORS’ DECLARATION In the directors’ opinion: • • • • the attached financial statements and notes thereto comply with the Corporations Act 2001, the Accounting Standards, the Corporations Regulations 2001 and other mandatory professional reporting requirements; the attached financial statements and notes thereto comply with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board as described in note 1 to the financial statements; the attached financial statements and notes thereto give a true and fair view of the Group’s financial position as at 30 June 2014 and of its performance for the financial year ended on that date; there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due and payable; and • at the date of this declaration, there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company and the Group will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due and payable. The directors have been given the declarations required by section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001. Signed in accordance with a resolution of the Board of Directors made pursuant to Section 295 (5) of the Corporations Act 2001. Dr David King Director Dated this 29th day of August 2014 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 69 70 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 71 72 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report Additional information The information in this section has been prepared as at 31 August 2014. 20 LARGEST SHAREHOLDERS Holder Name CELL SIGNALS INC SEISTEND (SUPER) PTY LTD MR GREGORY GLENN WORTH MR JAMES PATRICK TUITE & MRS WENDY TUITE MR TREVOR GOTTLIEB NATIONAL NOMINEES LIMITED MOORE FAMILY NOMINEE PTY LTD MR HAROLD LEONARD GOTTLIEB & MRS HELEN CYNTHIA GOTTLIEB MS MARIA HALASZ MR GREGORY BERNARD HILTON DR NORIIE ITOH INSCAPE SOLUTIONS PTY LTD MR IVAN STARESINIC MR DARIN ANJOUL & MRS TANIA ANJOUL MR PAUL RUGGIERO & MRS LORISSA RUGGIERO AOUN CORPORATION PTY LTD MR PAUL RUGGIERO & MRS LORISSA RUGGIERO MR TRAFFORD WILLIAM VAGG MR GREGORY PETER WILSON MR KEVIN PETER HOOPER & MR RONALD LESLIE HOOPER MR DARIN ANJOUL & MRS TANIA ANJOUL Balance Percent 28,000,000 22,500,000 21,850,000 20,646,462 17,973,000 17,108,911 15,000,000 12,595,000 12,000,000 10,897,000 9,504,950 9,100,000 8,500,000 8,500,000 6,650,000 6,647,709 6,536,233 6,243,266 6,100,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 3.803 3.056 2.968 2.805 2.441 2.324 2.038 1.711 1.630 1.480 1.291 1.236 1.155 1.155 0.903 0.903 0.888 0.848 0.829 0.815 0.815 Total Issued Share capital 258,352,531 736,185,702 35.093 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 73 Additional information Continued 20 LARGEST SHAREHOLDERS OF QUOTED OPTIONS Holder Name STRUCTURE INVESTMENTS PTY LTD MRS WISHNY SRITHARAN KRISHNARAJAH MR OSCAR DARIO ROSERO MR TREVOR GOTTLIEB SEISTEND (SUPER) PTY LTD PAESLER TRADING PTY LTD MR JAMES PATRICK TUITE & MRS WENDY TUITE MR GREGORY GLENN WORTH MR PAUL PHILIP RANBY MR EGAN HARVEY JOHNSON PROF WILLIAM JAMES VAGG MR DARIN ANJOUL & MRS TANIA ANJOUL MR DARIN ANJOUL & MRS TANIA ANJOUL MR SHERMAN YIP MR TRAFFORD WILLIAM VAGG MS JOANNE MARTIN PROCURE TO REPORT PTY LTD GOFFACAN PTY LTD MR ANH DUY PHAN & MRS LIEN XUAN THI TRAN DR ROBERT SYLVESTER VAGG & DR KYMBERLEY ANN VICKERY Total Issued Quoted Options SUBSTANTIAL HOLDERS There are no current substantial shareholders of Cellmid Limited shares. Balance 41,000,000 22,000,000 13,580,853 13,255,500 11,250,000 10,000,000 9,523,231 8,000,000 7,535,813 6,571,225 5,750,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 4,464,273 4,251,000 3,985,545 3,850,000 3,850,000 3,700,000 Percent 14.112 7.572 4.674 4.562 3.872 3.442 3.278 2.753 2.594 2.262 1.979 1.721 1.721 1.721 1.537 1.463 1.372 1.325 1.325 1.273 187,567,440 290,542,770 64.558 Holders Total Units 56 38 131 987 726 8,482 121,887 1,208,767 48,155,145 686,691,421 1,938 736,185,702 % 0.001 0.017 0.164 6.541 93.277 100.000 Holdings Ranges 1-1,000 1,001-5,000 5,001-10,000 10,001-100,000 100,001-99,999,999,999 Totals 74 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report NUMBER OF HOLDERS AND VOTING RIGHTS IN EACH CLASS OF SECURITIES Class of Security Ordinary Shares Unlisted options $0.035 expiring 20/11/2014 Unlisted options $0.056 expiring 20/11/2014 Unlisted options $0.062 expiring 19/02/2015 Unlisted options $0.10 expiring 15/11/2015 Unlisted options $0.03 expiring 15/11/2016 Unlisted options $0.032 expiring 15/6/2017 Unlisted options $0.034 expiring 14/8/2017 Listed options $0.034 expiring 23/10/2016 Cellmid FPO Voluntary Escrow for 3 years No of Holders Voting Rights 1,937 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 390 1 Yes No No No No No No No No No Subject to the ASX Listing Rules, the Company’s constitution and any special rights or restrictions attached to a share, at a meeting of shareholders: • On a show of hands, each shareholder present (in person, by proxy, attorney or representative) has one vote; and • On a poll, each shareholder present (in person, by proxy, attorney or representative) has; o One vote for each fully paid share they hold; and o A fraction of a vote for each partly paid share they hold. UNMARKETABLE PARCELS OF SHARES The number of shareholders with less than a marketable parcel of shares is 313. SECURITIES SUBJECT TO VOLUNTARY ESCROW There are no current securities subject to voluntary escrow for Cellmid Limited. CLASSES OF UNQUOTED SECURITIES Class of Security Unlisted options $0.035 expiring 20/11/2014 Unlisted options $0.056 expiring 20/11/2014 Unlisted options $0.062 expiring 19/02/2015 Unlisted options $0.10 expiring 15/11/2015 Unlisted options $0.03 expiring 15/11/2016 Unlisted options $0.032 expiring 15/6/2017 Unlisted options $0.034 expiring 14/8/2017 GENERAL There is no current on-market buy-back for the Company’s securities. No of Holders Total Units 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2,000,000. 7,000,000. 600,000. 100,000. 3,971,962. 5,000,000. 1,440,000. Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 75 Corporate Directory Office Suite 1802, Level 18, 15 Castlereagh Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia Tel: +612 9221 6830 Fax: +612 9221 8535 Email: info@cellmid.com.au Web: www.cellmid.com.au Non-Executive Chairman Dr David King Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director Maria Halasz Graeme Kaufman (appointed 27 August 2012) Martin Rogers (appointed 19 September 2012) Nicholas Falzon Jillian McGregor (appointed 16 July 2013) BDO Chartered Accountants Level 10, 1 Margaret Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia Piper Alderman Governor Macquarie Tower 1 Farrer Place Sydney NSW 2000 Australia FB Rice & Co Level 23, 44 Market Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia Boardroom Pty Limited Level 7, 207 Kent Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia Non-Executive Director Company Secretary Auditors Solicitors Patent Attorney Share Registry 76 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report Cellmid Limited Suite 1802, Level 18, 15 Castlereagh Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia ABN 69 111 304 119 T: +61 2 9221 6830 F: +61 2 9221 8535 E: info@cellmid.com.au W: www.cellmid.com.au 2014 Annual Report C E L L M I D L I M I T E D 2 0 1 4 A N N U A L R E P O R T

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above