More annual reports from Cellmid Limited:
2020 ReportPeers and competitors of Cellmid Limited:
DiaMedica Therapeutics Inc.Cellmid Limited
Suite 1802, Level 18,
15 Castlereagh Street
Sydney NSW 2000
Australia
ABN 69 111 304 119
T: +61 2 9221 6830
F: +61 2 9221 8535
E: info@cellmid.com.au
W: www.cellmid.com.au
2014 Annual Report
C
E
L
L
M
I
D
L
I
M
I
T
E
D
2
0
1
4
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T
Contents
Chairman’s Letter
CEO’s Report
Directors’ Report
Corporate Governance Statement
Annual Financial Report
Additional Information
Corporate Directory
4
5
11
25
29
73
76
Cellmid Limited (ASX:CDY)
Annual Report
ABN 69 111 304 119
Suite 1802, Level 18
15 Castlereagh Street
Sydney NSW 2000
Australia
T: +61 2 9221 6830
F: +61 2 9221 8535
E: info@cellmid.com.au
W: www.cellmid.com.au
Chairman’s
Letter
Dear Shareholder
I am pleased to present to you the 2014
Annual Report for Cellmid Limited.
During the 2014 financial year the
Company has made strong advances,
with important milestones achieved in all
areas of the business. The record revenue
of $2.8 million and continued increase in
net asset backing clearly demonstrates
that our business strategy is working.
Our focus remains on building a balanced
pharmaceutical product development
business with both sustainable revenues
and scale-changing upside potential; we
believe that achieving this will ultimately
be positively reflected in the Company’s
share price.
Progress with our therapeutic programs
has been rapid and exciting during
the reporting period. In May Cellmid
announced the successful humanisa-
tion and pre-clinical testing of its lead
anti-cancer antibody, CAB102, which
has since entered the clinical develop-
ment phase.
Manufacturing is underway and the
planning for necessary toxicity testing
and ethics approvals to conduct a
first-in-human safety study continues.
Assuming smooth progress through
these steps CAB102 is expected to be
administered to cancer patients in 2015.
This clinical trial will herald a watershed
moment for the Company, and for our
midkine therapeutics in general, since
it will be the first time midkine has ever
been targeted by any drug. A safe
outcome in this study would add signifi-
cant value not only to CAB102, but also
to Cellmid’s other therapeutic programs.
Pleasing progress also continues to be
made in our diagnostic portfolio. The
Cxbladder® test developed by our licen-
see Pacific Edge has been released
for sale in the US, Australia and New
Zealand, with Spain soon to be added
4 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
to the list. Royalties are expected to
begin during the 2015 financial year
from these markets.
Quest (Celera) continued to report good
progress with their lung cancer diagnostic
program, and clinical validation of their test
is well advanced. Meanwhile, Japanese
company Fujikura continues their devel-
opment of a pathology lab-friendly
midkine assay. In addition, the Company
has entered into new research collabora-
tions during the past year, and we aim to
translate these efforts into further licensing
opportunities in the future.
Clinical and scientific interest in midkine
continues to grow internationally to
Cellmid’s benefit given the extensive
patent protection that the Company
holds across all facets of the target.
The Company is well placed to share
in any commercial successes flowing
from midkine research.
In February the prominence of midkine
as a disease target was greatly boosted
when the prestigious and influential British
Journal of Pharmacology dedicated an
entire Special Themed Issue to midkine
biology. In April we co-hosted our Third
Midkine Symposium, on this occasion in
Kyoto, Japan, where the midkine story first
started. Once again this meeting attracted
a world-class line-up of speakers and
delegates from research institutes and
universities from around the world. Our
invited scientists shared with us many
exciting developments around midkine,
spanning a wide range of disease
indications.
Our key assets are our patents, and the
portfolio around midkine continues to
grow and mature; newly granted patents
during the year included a grant from the
UK Patent Office for the use of midkine
for hair growth, in addition to a USA
patent for surgical adhesion. Cellmid
remains the global leader in midkine
intellectual property with a portfolio of 87
patents across 21 patent families.
In parallel to the diligent advances in
our midkine business, Cellmid’s wholly
owned consumer health subsidiary,
Advangen, continued with growing sales
and new patent filings. Since acquiring
the Japanese parent company (Advan-
gen Inc.) in May 2013, the Company
has dramatically expanded the upcom-
ing product offerings, accessed new
markets and opened up new sales
channels in existing territories.
In Japan, a distribution agreement was
signed in late 2013 allowing for new
product launch in October 2014. We
have signed our first distribution agree-
ment in China and business develop-
ment efforts in other major markets
including the USA, Europe and South
America are well advanced.
Meanwhile, the Advangen scientific
team has discovered and patented novel
botanical extracts that inhibit FGF5 with
even greater efficiency than the current
active ingredients. These extracts will
form the basis of our next generation
hair growth products. The 2014 financial
year placed us well on the way to estab-
lishing the Company as a global leader
in scientifically and clinically validated
hair growth technology representing part
of the scale-changing upside potential
to which I referred earlier.
Further details of all these positive
developments can be found in the
report of our CEO, Maria Halasz.
Our achievements during the year would
not have been possible without the excep-
tional commitment and professionalism of
our small team of staff and consultants,
capably led by our CEO Maria Halasz.
On behalf of shareholders I express our
thanks for their commendable perform-
ance. Finally I take this opportunity to
thank all shareholders for their continued
support and encouragement.
Dr David King
Chairman of the Board
Cellmid Limited
CEO’s
Report
Dear Shareholder,
I am delighted to report to you on this 2014 financial year.
Reflecting on an exceptionally productive year, with a 267%
increase in revenue to $2.8 million and significant develop-
ments in our midkine antibody (MK antibody) program, Cellmid
has been going from strength to strength during the period.
The Company has grown substantially in 2014 in its operations,
assets and revenues. Sales in our consumer health business
reached $1.15 million, up 112% from 2013 ($541,649). Our
license related income reached $1.4 million. Although this was
mostly due to one off licensing fees we expect regular royalties
in 2015. The value of our tangible assets has increased, as
have our intangibles.
In a major therapeutic milestone two of our murine anti-midkine
antibodies showed efficacy in in vivo cancer models in October
2013 opening the door for clinical development. Since then, we
have successfully completed humanisation and lead selection
of our first drug candidate and commenced manufacturing.
Three years ago we set out with a strategy to build up revenues,
while maintaining the momentum for significant value inflec-
tion from our therapeutic program. It’s worthwhile to reflect
on the journey since then. Some of the Company’s achieve-
ments in that time are easily quantified in financial measures
and summarised in Table 1 below. In addition to the 1532%
revenue growth over three years Cellmid has shown contin-
ued investment in research and development while manag-
ing to cut losses 28% along the way. Critically, the Company
improved its income/expenditure ratio covering 65% of all
outgoings through sales and licensing revenues in 2014.
Cellmid has been progressively reducing its reliance on issuing
new shares for working capital during the past three years.
Underlying asset values have increased by the prudent deploy-
ment of capital into high value research and development
programs. Although the Company raised a modest amount of
money from the market in December 2013 ($2 million) through
a private placement, this did not result in dilution and we have
increased our net tangible asset backing during the 2014
financial year to 0.51 cents per share.
In addition to generating revenues the Company has contin-
ued to diligently manage costs and invest shareholders’ funds
wisely. This strategy was already showing results in 2013,
but the 2014 financial year has produced metrics that are
outstanding endorsements of the Company’s efforts.
MK antibody program is primed to enter the clinic in 2015
After delivering compelling results in diabetic nephropathy
in 2013 Cellmid’s MK antibodies have subsequently shown
efficacy and clear mechanism of action in pre-clinical models
of cancer. During the period the Company completed several
xenograft studies using its lead MK antibodies and observed
promising results.
The MK antibody treatment slowed primary tumour growth,
reduced cancer spread (metastasis) and slowed the forma-
tion of new blood vessels (angiogenesis) in different tumour
types. These findings completed the Company’s exten-
sive early studies to determine clinical direction for its MK
antibodies.
After assessment of the data from all previous pre-clinical
efficacy studies, including the strong efficacy from our diabetic
nephropathy studies in 2013 and reviewing commercial and
intellectual property issues, the Company has made a decision
to enter the clinic in multiple cancer indications. Cellmid is in a
very fortunate position as its MK antibodies show potential in
several disease indications, allowing for broad future exploita-
tion of the Company’s intellectual property.
Table 1: Results 2012-2014
Total revenue
Loss after income tax
R&D spending
Current assets
Loss per share
Net tangible asset backing per share
Income/Expenditure ratio
2012
$171,273
$1,972,483
$1,636,711
$2,441,636
0.46
0.48
6%
2013
$761,288
$1,541,307
$1,746,369
$3,778,936
0.27
0.48
25%
2014
$2,795,948
$1,480,836
$2,100,000
$4,499,891
0.21
0.51
65%
% change
2012-2014
up 1532%
down 25%
up 28%
up 84%
down 54%
up 6%
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 5
CEO’s Report
Continued
Critical in any successful drug development is the selec-
tion of the lead drug, in this case the best performing MK
antibody, which then can enter a clinical development
program. Having a large number of candidates has been
fortunate as it allowed the Company for ‘back-ups’ in case
the original drug failed to be manufacturable or wasn’t
showing the expected performance. It has also made the
selection of the lead more difficult as more than one of
the Company’s MK-antibodies have performed above the
threshold for selection.
For this reason it was especially exciting that, as a leap in
advancing towards clinical trials, we reported in May 2014
the completion of humanisation, testing, and selection of
our lead MK antibody for our planned ‘first in class’ clinical
trials.
The lead antibody, designated CAB102, significantly reduced
chemotherapy resistance in a pre-clinical treatment model of
refractory lung cancer. Importantly, initial cell expression and
stability data confirmed that CAB102 is manufacturable and
stable, making it a feasible commercial drug product.
Selection of CAB102 was the result of a pre-clinical program
in which dozens of Cellmid’s proprietary and patent-
protected murine MK antibodies were assessed for efficacy
and mechanism of action both in vivo and in vitro. Eventu-
ally, the two most promising murine antibodies identified by
this process were humanised by Cellmid’s collaborators,
Biotecnol SA.
Of the 78 humanised antibody variants generated by Biotecnol
SA, the six most promising candidates were then assessed
further for mechanism of action, in vivo anti-tumour efficacy,
and manufacturability.
Manufacturability was assessed by cell line expression and
level of aggregate formation in a feasibility run. Specificity
for MK has been retained, with no evidence of binding to
other proteins. A preliminary assessment showed all six
candidates were secreted at commercially viable concen-
trations during cell culture, all six candidates were readily
purified and have been confirmed as structurally stable and
aggregate free.
The six MK antibody candidates were then tested for
functional activity in vitro and in vivo using a tumour xenograft
model in combination with carboplatin. Carboplatin was
selected as the chemotherapy of choice as it is standard
therapy in lung cancer. The cancer xenograft studies were
performed in the widely studied K-Ras mutant, highly refrac-
tory and difficult to treat human non-small cell lung carci-
noma (NSCLC) cell line NCI-H460.
6 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
As expected, and consistent with clinical experience, carbo-
platin did not significantly reduce tumour volume or mass
when used alone compared to untreated controls in the
NCI-H460 model. However, three of the six MK antibody
candidates significantly reduced tumour growth when
combined with carboplatin. CAB102 has shown the great-
est efficacy reducing mean tumour volumes at 21 days post
treatment by 50%.
This was an exciting result providing a strong commercial
rationale for the MK antibody program in multiple cancer
types.
Concurrently to the humanisation and lead selection, Cellmid
actively assessed potential manufacturers. After an extensive
tendering process the Company selected Rodon Biologics, a
subsidiary of Biotecnol SA, to manufacture CAB102. Under
the agreement, Rodon will be responsible to engineer a high
yielding CHO cell line expressing CAB102, along with the
processes necessary to manufacture and formulate the drug
for first in human trials.
One of the key considerations in choosing Rodon was that
it has already produced the humanised candidates for initial
screening and tested CAB102’s manufacturability and stabil-
ity in small-scale production runs as part of the humanisa-
tion. The Company has collaborated closely with the Rodon
team during these work programs establishing a solid working
relationship.
Further cementing a strong collaboration was the agreement
signed with Biotecnol Ltd, another Biotecnol group company,
for the development of midkine (MK) TribodiesTM. MK Tribod-
ies™ are antibodies targeting MK in addition to other
oncogenic proteins. Biotecnol is one of the pioneers of multi-
specific antibody engineering with a validated and proprietary
technology platform.
The agreement allows for the parties to exchange ideas freely;
Biotecnol is responsible for the development and validation of
the novel MK TribodiesTM and Cellmid is expected to conduct
pre-clinical efficacy studies. The parties will share further
development costs equally and will jointly own the new multi-
specific drugs. The collaboration agreement is expected to
result in one or more novel and proprietary MK TribodiesTM.
Although early stage and potentially high risk, the collabo-
ration is also a low cost entry for the Company in the hotly
contested multi-specific antibody space.
As our lead antibody CAB102 is entering clinical develop-
ment, and a potential pipeline of products is on the horizon.
Cellmid’s MK antibody program is entering a truly exciting and
company changing period.
Cxbladder® is one of the success stories for MK as an
oncology biomarker
MK has continued as the subject of several cancer diagnostic
studies and results confirmed that it is indeed an important early
tumour marker. Cellmid completed its two year healthy volun-
teer study (CK3000) in December 2013 not only confirming
‘normal’ MK levels but finding outliers that presented healthy
and normal in all other biomarkers. On further examination
these subjects, with elevated MK levels, in fact had underlying
medical conditions expected with their respective MK levels.
In a strong start to the financial year Cellmid received confirma-
tion in July 2013 that Fujikura Kasei Co Ltd (Fujikura) intended
to exercise its option to licence the MK diagnostic technology.
With the exercising of the option Fujikura paid the requisite
JPY40 million ($440,000) milestone fee, contributing to the
$1.4 million total licensing revenue for the financial year. The
license agreement, currently in negotiations, is expected to
grant exclusive rights to Fujikura to use Cellmid’s proprietary
antibodies for latex based tests in Japan. In return, Fujikura
will pay royalties on products sold. Product development and
marketing costs will be borne by Fujikura.
Although Cellmid has a highly accurate MK-ELISA already, a
latex based assay is expected to suit commercial products
better, as it is widely used and accepted in pathology labora-
tories. It is also preferred as it can easily be automated, reduc-
ing processing costs.
A latex based test with a 500 picogram/ml accuracy is well
suited to identify individuals with elevated midkine levels. This
in turn is expected to lead to the development of a number
of cancer diagnostic products. Cellmid will support Fujikura’s
regulatory and product development programs with its MK
diagnostic expertise during the period of the license.
Having Fujikura, one of the largest suppliers of latex particles
for the medical diagnostics industry in Japan, as licensee is
important in carving out a market for Cellmid’s MK diagnostic
products.
Cellmid’s existing licensees, Quest (Celera) and Pacific Edge,
have also achieved significant milestones in their product
development and commercialisation programs, which resulted
in the payment of another milestone fee of $800,000 when
Cxbladder® was launched in the USA.
Cxbladder® sales commenced in the USA
Bladder cancer is one of the most common forms of malignan-
cies. In the United States around one million patients present
annually with haematuria; of these, 68,000 are diagnosed
with bladder cancer. Once treated, patients will have regular
cystoscopies, painful urethra endoscopies,
to monitor
reoccurrence. Pacific Edge’s Cxbladder® has the potential to
replace cystoscopy over time as a preferred method of patient
monitoring tool.
Cxbladder®, with MK as one of the important biomarkers,
has shown outstanding performance in clinical studies to
date, with 100% sensitivity and 85% specificity in late stage
bladder cancer. This specificity is expected to increase when
using it in a monitoring setting. The test can also be used
to differentiate between high and low grade cancers. In their
2014 Annual Report Pacific Edge Chairman, Chris Swann,
reiterated their earlier projections of $100 million sales after
five full years of trading. Cellmid will receive single digit royal-
ties on net sales.
Quest (Celera) Lung Cancer License
Cellmid signed a license agreement with Quest (Celera) in
October 2009 enabling Quest (Celera) to include MK as one
of the biomarkers in a lung cancer diagnostic test. The license
covers using MK for the early diagnosis, prognosis, disease
monitoring and management of lung cancer. The terms of
the agreement provide for a milestone payment at the time of
regulatory clearance for the lung cancer test, and royalties to
be paid semi-annually.
In June 2014 Cellmid received an annual update on the
progress made in the development of the Quest (Celera) lung
cancer test. In their letter of update Quest (Celera) stressed
that during the reporting period it continued to work diligently
towards the launch of a lung cancer diagnostic test which
includes MK. They asserted their belief that they have achieved
major advances during the period, in particular with the clinical
studies performed.
Since 2009 Quest (Celera) has been developing a blood test
to replace biopsy for determining whether pulmonary nodules
identified through computer tomography or chest X-rays are
cancerous. Quest (Celera) confirmed last year that validation
of the six-marker blood test was completed on the commer-
cial Luminex® diagnostic platform. They also reported in 2013
that they had signed an agreement with the NCI to participate
in the chest X-Ray screening Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and
Ovarian Trial (PLCO) as part of their clinical validation program.
Cellmid signed a license agreement with Pacific Edge
Limited in 2010 for the use of MK as one of the biomark-
ers in their bladder cancer test (Cxbladder®). Pacific Edge has
achieved solid progress since the license was signed and has
commenced sales using its CLIA registered Pennsylvania labs.
Quest (Celera) has noted that there is growing support for a
lung cancer screening program in the USA with recommenda-
tion from the US Preventative Screening Task Force (Decem-
ber 2013). Their estimate for the target market of the test is 7
million people annually, who are at high risk for lung cancer.
1 Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment, CLIA, sets standards and issues certificates for clinical laboratory testing in the United States.
It is administered by the US Centre for Medicare and Medical Devices, CMS
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 7
CEO’s Report
Continued
This is an important period for Quest (Celera) to advance to
regulatory filings of its test as its exclusivity for the use of MK
for lung cancer diagnosis expires in on 31 October 2014.
Whilst they may continue to use MK after that date, Cellmid
will have the option to license MK to others for lung cancer
diagnosis under the terms of the license agreement.
Huana Likang Biotechnology Cellmid has found a partner with
strong growth potential and a dedicated sales force for its
FGF5 inhibitor brands. Costs associated with marketing and
sales will be met solely by the distributor, however Cellmid will
provide assistance by supplying its marketing information and
materials and product designs.
Consumer health division delivered 112% revenue
increase in 2014 and growing
It was only in late 2012 that our consumer health division
became visible with the launch of our first Australian product,
evolis®. Since then, acquiring Advangen Inc. (Japan) resulted
in a transformative 2014 financial year. Advangen became an
international business with operations in Australia and Japan,
but with market potential far beyond these countries.
Embedding the acquisition during 2014 was challenging
and meant harmonising accounting systems, renegotiating
employment, supplier and manufacturing contracts, resetting
distribution agreements and focusing on the redevelopment
and branding of the full Advangen product range. At the end
of the first merged financial year I am pleased to report that
we have completed several of these key operational, product,
manufacturing, distribution and sales targets.
There is excitement in this sector particularly as demand for
performance driven hair care is growing rapidly. Within the $80
billion annual global market for hair care by far the most upside
is expected from anti-aging products. These are products that
can improve the quality, thickness and growth rate of hair.
While most products are either polymers or proteins that can
improve hair quality temporarily, there is a dearth of bioactive
hair care that affects the actual hair follicle making it stronger
and healthier. With our efficacious FGF5 inhibitors Cellmid has
the opportunity to become a leader in this market.
By far the fastest growing geographical region for anti-aging
hair care is China. When Cellmid acquired Advangen Inc., the
Company became the owner of Chinese import permits for
the Japnese produced Jo-Ju® and Lexilis Black® brands of
lotions and shampoo. On 29 January 2014 Cellmid signed
(via its wholly owned subsidiary Advangen Inc. (Japan)) a
Chinese distribution agreement for its Lexilis Black™ and
Jo-Ju™ brands with Beijing Huana Likang Biotechnology Co
Ltd. The distribution agreement is exclusive for these brands
in China subject to minimum performance requirements. The
agreement is for a period of three years, however it may be
automatically extended if minimum sales are met.
There has been intense interest in Cellmid’s FGF5 inhibitor
hair growth products from various market segments following
the acquisition of Advangen Inc. (Japan). In selecting Beijing
8 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
Ordinarily, companies importing healthcare and cosmetic
goods to China face significant hurdles; often it takes several
years before sales permits are issued. This is increasingly the
case as Chinese authorities are keen to enforce even stricter
conditions on imports. Whilst not formally acknowledged on
the Company’s balance sheets, it is likely that the value of
Cellmid’s import permits to China have increased significantly
since acquisition.
In last year’s Annual Report we stated that “our objective is
to establish ourselves as a global leader in scientifically and
clinically validated hair growth technology building a substan-
tial business, which provides cash flow and adds significant
shareholder value”. With a 112% increase in revenue, new
patent filings, expanding the distribution to China, signing new
distribution agreements in Japan and opening discussions in
other markets we are well on our way to achieving it.
Patent Portfolio Update
Cellmid holds the most significant intellectual property assets
related to MK worldwide. Cellmid’s patent portfolio currently
includes 87 patents in 21 patent families, which cover the
use of MK and anti-MK agents for therapeutic purposes in a
number of diseases, as well as the use of MK as a diagnostic
marker in cancer and other disorders.
During the period our patent portfolio continued to grow with
new filings and grants. In a tremendous commercial outcome
on 8 October 2014 Cellmid reported that the European Patent
Office has granted its patent entitled “Antibody recognising
C-domain of midkine”. The granted claims provide broad
coverage as they relate to antibodies and antibody fragments
which bind to the important functional C-domain of growth
factor MK.
The patent also grants composition of matter claims for
MK-specific antibodies, including Cellmid’s lead anti-cancer
antibody.
This is a key patent in Cellmid’s portfolio and gives the
Company clear, exclusive rights to develop MK antibodies
(including CAB102) unencumbered by competition. Moreo-
ver, Cellmid’s patent coverage for its therapeutic antibodies
now extends across cancer, inflammatory and autoimmune
diseases, multiple sclerosis and surgical adhesion.
In a further boost to the Company’s MK antibody patent portfo-
lio the Japanese Patent Office (JPO) granted patent applica-
tion JP 2007-544236 “Method for Treatment or Prevention of
Diseases Associated with a Functional Disorder of Regulatory
T Cells” on 18 October 2013. It is a member of a key patent
family in Cellmid’s antibody patent portfolio and it adds yet
another layer of intellectual property protection to Cellmid’s
MK antibody program.
JP 2007-544236 covers the use of MK antibodies to increase
the number of regulatory T cells (Tregs). Tregs are central
controllers of autoimmune responses; when Treg numbers are
too low, the body’s immune system can attack its own tissues,
leaving subjects vulnerable to autoimmune diseases. Increas-
ing the Treg numbers can mitigate such autoimmune attack.
This family was granted last year in the USA with similar claims
allowed. The patents in this family expire in 2027.
In another development on the intellectual property front the
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) granted
Cellmid’s patent application 13/539,247 entitled “Preventa-
tive for Adhesion Following Abdominal Surgery”. This patent
protects the use of midkine (MK)-specific DNA and RNA
antisense molecules that disrupt MK expression and prevent
the formation of surgical adhesions.
This patent complements the already granted US patent
10/547,011 entitled ‘Agents for Preventing Post-Laparotomy
Adhesions’, which covers the use of MK antibodies and
broadens the platform of the Company’s anti-midkine agents.
Other patents in this family have already been granted in
Japan and are under examination in Europe. The surgical
adhesion patents make up one of the five key families which
provide the company’s dominant intellectual property position
over the treatment of inflammatory diseases by targeting MK.
Midkine a scientifically important target for many
diseases
It is not often that one can report that a major scientific journal
dedicated their entire review edition to a single company’s
technology. Yet this is exactly what happened in February 2014
when the British Journal of Pharmacology (BJP) published a
special edition dedicated to MK including 16 research papers
by various authors. The BJP is the premier peer-reviewed
publication of the British Pharmacological Society, and it is
recognised as one of the most influential international journals
covering all aspects of experimental pharmacology.
Being featured in a high-impact, internationally regarded
journal with a global audience is a significant validation of
MK’s importance in health and disease. Cellmid recognised
this potential early on, and it is pleasing to see the increas-
ing and ever wider realisation of MK’s potential utility as a
disease target or as a therapeutic agent in its own right.
Having MK reviewed in this way is also very helpful to Cellmid’s
product development programs. The publications provide
strong supporting evidence to regulators, key opinion leaders
and potential biotech and pharma partners.
Further validating MK’s importance as a disease target was
the largest attendance yet by scientists from eleven countries
at the Third Midkine Symposium in Kyoto in April 2014.
The Symposium, co-hosted by Emeritus Professor Takashi
Muramatsu and Professor Kenji Kadomatsu, built on the
success of the first two MK meetings held in Sydney in 2010
and Istanbul in 2012 and delivered significant advances on our
understanding of MK biology and function.
During the Symposium it was reported that serum-stable,
drug-like MK manufacture has been achieved at large scale
for clinical use by one of the company’s commercial partners
and new insights were presented into MK’s molecular struc-
ture and its functional implications. Further understanding
of the receptors and signalling pathways engaged by MK in
cancer and other diseases have been illustrated in in vitro
and in vivo studies by several scientists directly relevantly to
Cellmid’s own MK antibody studies in cancer.
Perhaps most stunningly, the precise mechanism of action by
which MK promotes inflammatory cell infiltration into tissues
was presented during the Symposium giving clear insights
into how anti-MK treatments might disrupt this process.
This has been a truly exceptional year with strong financial and
operational performance in all of the Company’s businesses.
We are beginning to see the reaction from the market but the
real value created is yet to be built into the Company’s share
price. We are determined to continue on this path and pursue
increased shareholder value on all fronts.
This progress would not be possible without the unwavering
support from our Chairman, Dr David King, and the Board. I
would like to thank them and the dedicated Cellmid team for
their contribution in achieving these substantial milestones this
financial year. I would also like to thank our shareholders for
their support.
Issue contains
invited reviews
The BJP Midkine
from
pre-eminent MK researchers from around the world, with
comprehensive up-to-date articles covering the gamut of MK
biology. Publications examine the role of MK in diseases includ-
ing various cancers, kidney diseases, cardiovascular disease,
multiple sclerosis and neurodegenerative disorders. New
understanding of MK signalling and receptors is also featured.
Maria Halasz
CEO and Managing Director
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 9
Directors’
Report
11
24
25
29
Contents
Directors’ Report
Auditor’s Independence Declaration
Corporate Governance Statement
Annual Financial Report
The directors present their report, together with the financial statements of the Group, being Cellmid Limited (“the
Company”) and its Controlled Entities, for the financial year ended 30 June 2014.
Principal activities and significant changes in nature of activities
The principal activities of the Group during the financial year were:
• The development and commercialisation of diagnostic and therapeutic products for the management of diseases such
as cancer and various chronic inflammatory conditions by targeting midkine (Midkine Business); and
• the development and sale of over the counter (OTC) treatments to alleviate excessive and abnormal hair loss and re-
establish the natural hair growth cycle (Consumer Health Business)
There were no significant changes in the nature of the Group’s principal activities during the financial year.
Operating results and review of operations for the year
Operating results
The consolidated loss of the Group was down 3.9% to $1,480,836, after providing for income tax ($1,541,307 in 2013).
Revenue from product sales was up by more than 112% to $1,150,931 ($541,649 in 2013), while total revenue and other
income was up by more than 267% to $2,795,948 for the year ($761,288 in 2013).
REviEw Of OpERAtiOns
The Group closed its first full year of operations for the Consumer Health Business following the acquisition of Advangen
Inc. The Japanese distribution was expanded and new contracts have been signed with existing partners. In Australia,
sales to hair salons commenced during the reporting period.
Further development milestones have been achieved in the Group’s Midkine Business with the completion of humanisa-
tion and lead antibody (CAB102) selection and the commencement of manufacturing for clinical trials. The Group has
commenced preparations for its ’First-in-human’ clinical studies with reviewing clinical sites and negotiating with principal
investigators. The Group’s diagnostic business has delivered solid revenue during the reporting period from milestone and
option to license fees.
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 11
Directors’ Report
Continued
i. Consumer Health Business – Distribution continues to grow for the Group’s FGF5 inhibitor hair growth products
The Consumer Health Business was set up to commercialise over the counter hair growth products based on the FGF5
inhibition technology developed by Advangen Inc. (Japan). With the acquisition of Advangen Inc. (Japan) in May 2013 the
Group has taken control of global rights for the technology and closed the first full year of operations for the joint business.
In Japan the Group signed a major distribution agreement with Natural Garden, a direct marketing company, for the supply
of existing brands and newly developed products. The salon distribution has also been expanded for the male lotion and
shampoo brands (Lexilis Black®). Test marketing of the Group’s new female brand of lotions and shampoos, Jo-Ju Red®
commenced in Japan.
In Australia the roll out of the products in hair salons commenced in New South Wales in March 2014 with strong results.
Recruitment of sales people will continue in other states over the coming months. The Group has not invested in market-
ing into pharmacies during the period, which meant that new doors have been opened but sell through has slowed down.
The Advangen Inc. acquisition delivered Chinese import permits for the Lexilis® and Jo-Ju® brands, with the potential to
accelerate geographical expansion of the distribution. The Group has been able to take advantage of these valuable assets
and signed a distribution agreement with Beijing Huana Likang, a marketing company with primary channels in television
shopping networks and online sales.
The Group has been successful in the fractionation and synthesis of novel FGF5 inhibitors and filed new composition of
matter patent applications during the period. New formulations have been prepared using these discoveries and a safety
study has been initiated in humans. The new formulations have also given impetus to a product strategy and technology
review, which was commenced in June 2014.
ii. Midkine Business
Advances in therapeutic product development – lead antibody in manufacturing for clinical studies
Under this program the Group has been developing its anti-midkine antibody drugs in several indications and, on the basis
of data generated from its pre-clinical efficacy studies, elected to proceed to ’First-in-human’ clinical studies in oncology.
During the reporting period the Group has achieved significant milestones on its path to the clinic. Proof of concept studies
have shown that the Group’s antibody drug is effective in cancer when assessed in a pre-clinical model of non-small cell
lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The Group successfully humanised its antibodies and selected a lead drug candidate (CAB102)
to progress to clinical studies. Importantly, manufacturability of CAB102 has been confirmed and the Group has appointed
its manufacturing partner.
This program received significant boost during the reporting with the granting of major patents. The European Patent Office
granted one of the Group’s most important midkine antibody patent applications, “Antibody Recognising C domain of
midkine”, which has oncology claims. Another antibody patent entitled “Method for the treatment or prevention of diseases
associated with a functional disorder of T Cells” was granted by the Japanese Patent Office in October 2013.
iii. Midkine (MK) Diagnostic Program
The Group’s licensees, Pacific Edge Limited and Celera Quest, continued to make significant progress towards commer-
cialisation of their respective products during the reporting period. Fujikura Kasei has exercised its option to license the
Group’s antibodies for diagnostic purposes in Japan. A new diagnostic collaboration was signed with Abcodia Limited
during the reporting period for the assessment of midkine in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer, and internal diagnostic
programs have continued.
iv. Pacific Edge Limited launched Cxbladder® in the USA with midkine as one of the biomarkers
The Group signed a license agreement with Pacific Edge Limited in 2010 for the use of the Group’s midkine protein as one
of the biomarkers in Cxbladder®, a bladder cancer diagnostic test. According to the terms of the license Pacific Edge paid
an upfront fee and was to pay a milestone fee in shares on reaching first sale of the product outside of Australia and New
Zealand. Pacific Edge launched its Cxbladder® test in the USA in March 2013 and signed up a number of US health-care
12 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
providers, making their first commercial sale in July 2013. This event triggered the last milestone payment to the Group
which was received on 1 August 2014.
v. Celera Quest license update
The Group signed a license agreement with Celera Quest in October 2009 for the use of midkine in their lung cancer
diagnostic test. The Group received an upfront payment at the time of signing, and a milestone payment will become
payable by Celera Quest at the time of regulatory clearance and royalties on sales.
During the reporting period Celera Quest continued to work towards the launch of a lung cancer diagnostic test which
includes MK and reported the achievement of major milestones. Celera Quest commenced testing of the samples obtained
from the US National Cancer Institute (NCI) sponsored Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) trial on the Luminex
platform. The Group has been advised that the PLCO study results are expected in late 2014.
In addition, Celera Quest reported on the completion of four other clinical studies conducted as part of their clinical valida-
tion program for the lung cancer test. Celera Quest has until 31 October 2014 to commercialise their lung cancer blood
test with MK included, after which they maintain their ability to use MK, but will lose exclusivity under the terms of the
license agreement.
vi. Fujikura Kasei option to license
The Group signed an Option to License Agreement with Fujikura Kasei for the exclusive supply of the Group’s propri-
etary antibodies for validation in Fujikura’s latex diagnostic platform. The agreement provided that Fujikura will proceed to
exercise its option to license subject to reaching the minimum 500 picogram/ml limit of detection. The validation program
was completed successfully and Fujikura Kasei exercised its option to license in July 2013. A definitive license agreement
is currently being negotiated between Fujikura Kasei and the Group.
vii. Intellectual Property update
The Group has a large and valuable patent portfolio which consists of 87 patents across 21 patent families. Of these 62
patents have been granted, 24 filed or under examination and one in PCT (Patent Cooperation Treaty) filing stage.
The European Patent Office granted the therapeutic patent “Antibody Recognising C domain of midkine” with important
claims around treatment of cancer in October 2013. Also in October 2013 the Japanese Patent office granted another
midkine antibody patent entitled “Method for the treatment or prevention of diseases associated with a functional disorder
of T Cells”.
Financial position
The net assets of the Group have increased by 7% to $5,663,726 ($5,305,157 at 30 June 2013). Importantly, current
assets increased by 19% to $4,499,891 ($3,778,936 at 30 June 2013). The directors believe that the Group is in a stable
financial position to carry out its current operations.
Significant changes in state of affairs
There have been no significant changes in the state of affairs of entities in the Group during the year.
Dividends paid or recommended
The Company has not paid or declared any dividends during the financial year (2013: nil).
Events since the end of the financial year
No matters or circumstances have arisen since the end of the financial year which significantly affected or could significantly
affect the operations of the Group, the results of those operations or the state of affairs of the Group in future financial years.
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 13
Directors’ Report
Continued
Likely developments and expected results of operations
Information on the Group’s likely developments in the operation of the consolidated entity and the expected results of
operations have not been included in this annual report.
Environmental regulations
The Group’s operations are not regulated by any significant environmental regulations under a law of the Commonwealth
or of a state or territory of Australia.
Proceedings on behalf of the Company
No person has applied to the Court under section 237 of the Corporations Act 2001 for leave to bring proceedings on
behalf of the Group, or to intervene in any proceedings to which the Group is a party, for the purpose of taking responsibility
on behalf of the Group for all or part of those proceedings.
Meetings of directors
Six meetings of the directors were held during the financial year (including committees of directors). Attendances by each
director during the year were as follows:
Directors’
Meetings
Audit
Committee
Nomination
Committee
Remuneration
Committee
Number
eligible to
attend
Number
attended
Number
eligible to
attend
Number
attended
Number
eligible to
attend
Number
attended
Number
eligible to
attend
Number
attended
Dr David King
Ms Maria Halasz
Mr Martin Rogers
Mr Graeme Kaufman
6
6
6
6
5
6
4
4
6
-
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
-
-
3
3
-
-
3
3
-
3
3
3
-
3
3
The names, qualifications, experience and special responsibilities of each person who has been a director during the year
and to the date of this report are:
Dr David King
Qualifications
– Chairman (Non-executive)
– Fellow of The Australian Institute of Company Directors, Fellow of the
Australian Institute of Geoscientists and a PHD in Seismology from the
Australian National University.
Experience
– Experience in high growth companies and a track record in starting
business ventures and developing them into attractive investment and/
or take over targets.
Interest in shares and options
– Shares: 22,500,000 indirectly held. Options: 11, 250,000 indirectly held
(Expiry: 23 October 2016, exercisable at $0.034 each).
Special responsibilities
– Chairman of the Remuneration Committee and Nomination Committee,
Other directorships in listed entities
held in the previous three years
and member of the Audit Committee.
– Current directorships - Robust Resources Limited, Republic Gold
Limited, Galilee Energy Limited, African Petroleum Corporation Limited
and Tengri Resources
Previous directorship - Gas2Grid Limited, Ausmon Resources Limited,
Sapex Limited and Eastern Star Gas Limited.
14 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
Ms Maria Halasz
Qualifications
Experience
Interest in shares and options
– Managing Director (Executive)
– A Graduate of the Australian Institute of Company Directors; MBA, BSc
in microbiology.
– Over 20 years’ experience in biotechnology companies; initially working
in executive positions in biotechnology firms, then managing investment
funds and later holding senior positions in corporate finance specialis-
ing in life sciences.
– Shares: 13,050,000 directly held.
Shares: 9,450,000 indirectly held.
Options: 7,000,000 (Expiry: 20 November 2014, exercisable at $0.056
each) indirectly held.
Options: 1,500,000 (Expiry: 23 October 2016, exercisable at $0.034
each) indirectly held.
Options: 5,000,000 (Expiry: 15 June 2017, exercisable at $0.032 each)
indirectly held.
Special responsibilities
– Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer.
Other directorships in listed entities
held in the previous three years
– None
Mr Martin Rogers
Qualifications
Experience
– Director (Non-executive)
– Chemical Engineering and Science Degrees from University of New
South Wales
– Mr Rogers has been both an investor and senior executive in a private
funded advisory business in the science and biotechnology sectors,
where he was instrumental in significantly increasing the value of those
investments. Mr Rogers also holds a number of not-for-profit roles.
Interest in shares and options
– Shares: 5,155,700 shares indirectly held.
Options: 41,000,000 (Expiry: 23 October 2016, exercisable at $0.034
each) indirectly held
Special responsibilities
– Member of the Audit Committee and member of the Remuneration
Committee
Other directorships in listed entities
held in the previous three years
– Chairman of Actinogen Limited, non-executive director of Rhinomed
Ltd and non-executive chairman of OncoSil Medical Limited
Mr Graeme Kaufman
– Director (Non-executive)
Qualification
Experience
– BSc & MBA from Melbourne University
– Over 46 years’ experience in biotechnology spanning technical,
commercial and financial areas. Having worked for 34 years at CSL
Limited, Australia’s largest biopharmaceutical company, he held senior
positions including Production Director, General Manager Finance and
General Manager Biosciences.
Interest in shares and options
– Nil
Special responsibilities
– Chairman of the Audit Committee and member of the Remuneration
Other directorships in listed entities
held in the previous three years
Committee and Nomination Committee.
– Bionomics Ltd and IDT Australia Ltd
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 15
Directors’ Report
Continued
Company Secretary
Mr Jillian McGregor
–
Joint Company Secretary (Appointed 16 July 2013)
Qualifications
Experience
– Bachelor of commerce and law from University of New South Wales
–
Jillian has worked as a corporate lawyer for more than 15 years in mid
and top tier Australian law firms. During this time she has provided
Corporations Act and ASX Listing Rule advice to many ASX listed
companies including advice on related party transactions, capital raising
requirements, and meeting continuous disclosure requirements.
Mr Nicholas Falzon
Qualifications
Experience
–
Joint Company Secretary and Financial Controller
– Bachelor of Business at UTS and a member of the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of Australia
– As a partner at PKF Lawler Partners Nicholas works with a number of
listed and unlisted companies advising them on all aspects of their finan-
cial management.
Directors have been in office since the start of the financial year to the date of this report unless otherwise stated.
Remuneration report (audited)
The information provided in this remuneration report has been audited as required by section 308 (3C) of the Corporations
Act 2001.
Principles used to determine the nature and amount of remuneration
The performance of the Group depends on the quality of its directors and executives.
To prosper, the Group must attract, motivate and retain highly skilled directors and executives. To this end, the Group
embodies the following principles in its remuneration framework:
• provide competitive rewards to attract high calibre executives; and
• establish appropriate performance hurdles in relation to variable executive remuneration.
The Board assesses the appropriateness of the nature and amount of remuneration of directors and senior managers of
the Group on a periodic basis by reference to relevant employment market conditions with the overall objective of ensuring
maximum stakeholder benefit from the retention of a high quality Board and executive team.
Consolidated entity performance and link to remuneration
Remuneration for certain individuals is directly linked to performance of the consolidated entity. No performance based
bonus or incentive payments are in place, however Maria Halasz has employee share options that will vest upon achieving
key milestones being achieved. These Milestones are detailed in the Equity-based compensation section of this remunera-
tion report.
The Nomination and Remuneration Committee is of the opinion that the continued improved results can be attributed in
part to the adoption of performance based compensation and is satisfied that this improvement will continue to increase
shareholder wealth if maintained over the coming years.
16 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
The table below details the last five years earnings and total shareholders return.
Sales
EBITDA
EBIT
$
2014
$
2013
$
2012
$
2011
$
2010
1,150,931
541,649
132,826
149,735
325,999
(2,165,345)
(2,341,372)
(2,702,954)
(2,776,753)
(1,580,973)
(2,277,485)
(2,358,006)
(2,714,373)
(2,777,009)
(1,594,694)
Loss after income tax
(1,480,836)
(1,541,307)
(1,972,483)
(2,269,637)
(1,339,948)
The factors that are considered to affect total shareholders return (‘TSR’) are summarised below:
Share price at financial year end
Total dividends declared
Basic earnings per share
Remuneration structure
$
2014
0.03
-
(0.21)
$
2013
0.02
-
(0.27)
$
2012
0.02
-
(0.46)
$
2011
0.02
-
(0.65)
$
2010
0.02
-
(0.48)
In accordance with best practice corporate governance, the structure of non-executive director and senior manager
remuneration is separate and distinct.
Non-executive director remuneration
Objective
The Board seeks to set aggregate remuneration at a level that provides the Group with the ability to attract and retain direc-
tors of the highest calibre, while incurring costs that are acceptable to shareholders.
Structure
Each non-executive director receives a fixed fee for being a director of the Group.
The constitution and the ASX listing Rules specify that the maximum aggregate remuneration of non-executive directors
shall be determined from time to time by a general meeting of shareholders. At the general meeting of shareholders in
2005, the maximum amount was set at $300,000 per annum. In 2014, the Group paid non-executive directors a total of
$157,780 ($145,802 in 2013).
The amount of aggregate remuneration sought to be approved by shareholders and the fixed fees paid to directors are
reviewed annually. The Board considers fees paid to non-executive directors of comparable companies when undertaking
the annual review process.
Executive remuneration
Objective
The Group aims to reward executives with a level and mix of remuneration commensurate with their position and respon-
sibilities within the Group and so as to:
•
reward executives for Group and individual performance against targets set by reference to appropriate benchmarks;
• align the interests of executives with those of shareholders; and
• ensure total remuneration is competitive by market standards.
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 17
Directors’ Report
Continued
Structure
A policy of the Board is the establishment of employment or consulting contracts with the CEO and other senior executives.
Remuneration consists of fixed remuneration under an employment or consultancy agreement and may include long term
equity based incentives that are subject to satisfaction of performance conditions. Details of these performance conditions
are outlined in the equity based payments section of this remuneration report.The equity based incentives are intended to
retain key executives and reward performance against agreed performance objectives.
Fixed remuneration
The level of fixed remuneration is set so as to provide a base level of remuneration that is both appropriate to the position
and competitive in the market.
Fixed remuneration is reviewed annually by the Board and the process consists of a review of Group wide and individual
performance, relevant comparative remuneration in the market, and internal and (where appropriate) external advice on
policies and practices.
Senior managers are given the opportunity to receive their fixed (primary) remuneration in a variety of forms including
cash and expense payment plans, such that the manner of payment chosen is optimal for the recipient without creating
additional cost for the Group.
Remuneration policy and performance
Other than the CEO, Ms Halasz, none of the directors’ remuneration is at risk’ remuneration. Refer below for further infor-
mation on Ms Halasz’s remuneration.
Remuneration details for the year ended 30 June 2014
Details of the remuneration of the directors and key management personnel of the group (as defined in AASB 124 Related
Party Disclosures) and the highest paid executives of Cellmid are set out in the following tables.
2014
Cash salary fees
Cash bonus
Superannuation
Options
Short term benefits
Post
employment
benefits
Share
based
payments
$
5,999
3,448
-
-
$
-
-
-
-
Total
$
70,999
40,948
45,833
157,780
27,750
52,047
514,268
-
-
-
37,197
52,047
672,048
Non-executive directors
David King
Graeme Kaufman
Martin Rogers
Total non-executive directors
Executive directors and key management
Maria Halasz
Nicholas Falzon1
$
65,000
37,500
45,833
148,333
434,471
-
582,804
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
2013
Cash salary fees
Cash bonus
Superannuation
Options
Short term benefits
Post
employment
Share
based
payments
Non-executive directors
David King
Graeme Kaufman
Martin Rogers
Robin Beaumont2
Total non-executive directors
Executive directors and key management
Maria Halasz
Nicholas Falzon1
$
65,000
34,058
33,062
4,767
136,887
400,000
-
536,887
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
5,850
3,065
-
-
8,915
36,000
-
44,915
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total
$
70,850
37,123
33,062
4,767
145,802
436,000
-
581,802
1. Nicholas Falzon, company secretary, was appointed on 6 October 2010, is a director of PKF Lawler Partners Pty
Ltd who provides accounting and company secretarial services to Cellmid Limited. The contract is based on normal
commercial terms. A total of $105,600 ($92,125 in 2013) was received by PKF Lawler Partners Pty Limited in relation
to this contract for the year.
2. Robin Beaumont resigned as director on 27th August 2012.
KMP shareholdings
The number of shares held in the company during the financial year by each director and key management personnel of
Cellmid Limited, including their personally related parties, are set out below.
Balance
at beginning
of year
Received
as part of
remuneration
Other
changes
Balance at
end of year
22,500,000
-
-
22,500,000
6,750,000
12,000,000
3,750,000
22,500,000
-
5,155,700
22,500,000
2,725,250
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5,155,700
22,500,000
4,024,750
6,750,000
-
-
5,155,700
5,155,700
2014
David King
Maria Halasz
Graeme Kaufman
Martin Rogers
2013
David King
Maria Halasz
Graeme Kaufman
Martin Rogers
KMP option holdings
The number of options held in the company during the financial year by each director and member of key management
personnel of Cellmid Limited, including their personally related parties, are set out below.
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 19
Directors’ Report
Continued
Balance at
beginning of
year
11,250,000
16,362,625
1,000,000
44,000,000
-
17,000,000
-
-
2014
David King
Maria Halasz
Graeme Kaufman
Martin Rogers
2013
David King
Maria Halasz
Graeme Kaufman
Martin Rogers
-
-
-
-
-
-
Acquired
Expired/
forfeited
Other
changes
Balance at
end of year
Vested and
exercisable
at end of
year
-
-
137,375
(3,000,000)
(1,000,000)
(3,000,000)
-
-
-
-
11,250,000
11,250,000
13,500,000
13,500,000
-
-
41,000,000
41,000,000
-
-
-
-
11,250,000
11,250,000
11,250,000
(637,375)
16,362,625
16,362,625
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
44,000,000
44,000,000
44,000,000
Relationship between remuneration policy and company performance
The relative proportions of remuneration that are linked to performance and those that are fixed are as follows:
Fixed remuneration
At risk STI
At risk LTI
2014
2013
2014
2013
2014
2013
Directors
David King
Maria Halasz
Graeme Kaufman
Martin Rogers
100%
89.9%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Other key management personnel
Nicholas Falzon
100%
100%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10.1%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Service agreements
The CEO, Maria Halasz, is an employee of the group under an agreement signed on 21 September 2007. Under the terms
of the present contact:
• Ms Halasz may resign from her position and thus terminate this contract by giving six months’ written notice. On
resignation any unvested options will be forfeited.
• The group may terminate the employment agreement by providing six months’ written notice or providing payment in
lieu of the notice period (based on the fixed component of Ms Halasz’s remuneration).
• The group may terminate the contract at any time without notice if serious misconduct has occurred. Where termination
with cause occurs, the CEO is only entitled to that portion of remuneration which is fixed, and only up to the date of
termination. On termination with cause, any unvested options will immediately be forfeited.
• Ms Halasz’s employment agreement provides for issuing performance incentives subject to the discretion of the board.
During the 2014 financial year there has been no performance incentive issued to Ms Halasz.
20 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
Equity based compensation
Details of the options granted as remuneration to those key management personnel and executives during the year:
Share based payments
Options
Granted in
2014
Value of
options at
grant date
Options
vested in
2014
Directors
David King
Maria Halasz1
Graeme Kaufman
Martin Rogers
Other key management personnel
Nick Falzon
No
-
$
-
12,000,000
219,600
-
-
-
-
-
-
No
-
-
-
-
-
Value of
options
expensed in
2014
$
-
52,047
-
-
-
Proportion of
remuneration
-
10.1%
-
-
-
1. On 25 November 2013, 12,000,000 loan shares were granted to Maria Halasz in three equal tranches under the
Cellmid Limited and Controlled Entities Employee Incentive Plan and as approved by shareholders at the annual general
meeting on 22 November 2013. Ordinary shares were issued under the arrangement funded by a limited recourse loan
with the following vesting conditions attached:
Tranche
Vesting date
Shares
Vesting condition
1
2
3
25/11/2016
4,000,000
25/11/2016
4,000,000
25/11/2016
4,000,000
Shares will vest at any time before the vesting date when the
Group’s operating revenue reaches a total of $4,000,000 over
any consecutive 12 months.
Shares will vest at any time before the vesting date subject
to the first patient being recruited into the Group’s planned
midkine antibody trial.
Shares will vest at any time before the vesting date subject to
the signing of one of the following agreements for the Group’s
consumer health products in a territory outside of Australia and
Japan:
(a) a diagnostic or therapeutic licence; or
(b) a distribution agreement.
The effect of the arrangement is akin to an option.
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 21
Directors’ Report
Continued
Shares under option
Unissued ordinary shares of the Company under option at the date of this report are as follows:
Unlisted options
Unlisted options
Unlisted options
Unlisted options
Unlisted options
Unlisted options
Listed options
Unlisted options
Unlisted options
Expiry date
1 July 2014
20 November 2014
20 November 2014
19 February 2015
15 November 2015
15 November 2016
23 October 2016
15 June 2017
14 August 2017
Exercise Price
Number under option
$ 0.05
$ 0.06
$ 0.04
$ 0.06
$ 0.10
$ 0.03
$ 0.03
$ 0.03
$ 0.03
5,002,006
7,000,000
2,000,000
600,000
100,000
3,971,962
290,542,770
5,000,000
1,440,000
315,656,738
No shares were issued on the exercise of options during the financial year ended 30 June 2014 (nil in 2013). No further
shares have been issued on exercise of options since 30 June 2014.
12,000,000 shares were held in escrow and unpaid at 30 June 2014 (nil in 2013). Refer to note 18(a) for further details.
38,448,435 options were lapsed during the financial year ended 30 June 2014 (2,000,000 in 2013).
Loans to directors and other members of key management personnel
There were no loans to directors or other members of key management personnel during or since the end of the
financial year.
Other
On the 25th of November 2013, the Company acquired the remaining 5% interest in its subsidiary, Advangen International
Pty Ltd from Direct Capital Group Pty Limited. Direct Capital Group Pty Limited is a company wholly owned by Maria Halasz
and was acquired for a consideration of 3,515,625 shares in Cellmid Limited, with a market value of $119,531.
Indemnification and insurance of officers and auditors
During the financial year, the Group paid a premium to insure the directors and officers of the Group.
The liabilities insured are legal costs that may be incurred in defending civil or criminal proceedings that may be brought
against the officers in their capacity as officers of the Group, and any other payments arising from liabilities incurred by the
officers in connection with such proceedings. This does not include such liabilities (other than legal costs) that arise from
conduct involving a wilful breach of duty by the officers or the improper use by the officers of their position or of informa-
tion to gain advantage for them or someone else or to cause detriment to the Company. It is not possible to apportion the
premium between amounts relating to the insurance against legal costs and those relating to other liabilities.
During or since the end of the financial year, the Group has given an indemnity or entered into an agreement to indemnify,
or paid or agreed to pay insurance premiums in favour of its directors as follows:
• a right to access certain Board papers of the Group during the period of their tenure and for a period of seven years
after that tenure ends
22 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
• subject to the Corporation Act 2001, an indemnity in respect of liability to persons other the Company and its related
bodies corporate that they may incur while acting in their capacity as an officer of the Company or a related body
corporate, except for specified liabilities where that liability involves a lack of good faith or is for legal costs for defending
certain legal proceedings; and
•
the requirement that the Group maintain appropriate directors’ and officers’ insurance for the officer.
No liability has arisen under these indemnities as at the date of the report.
There is no indemnity cover in favour of the auditor of the Group during the financial year.
Non audit services
The Group may decide to employ the auditor on assignments additional to their statutory audit duties where the auditor’s
expertise and experience with the Group and/or the Group are important. Details of the amounts paid or payable to the
auditor, BDO for audit and non audit services provided during the year are set out below.
The nature of the services provided does not compromise the general principles relating to auditor independence in
accordance with APES 110: Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants set by the Accounting Professional and Ethical
Standards Board.
Auditing or reviewing the financial statements
BDO East Coast Partnership – Australia
BDO Toyo & Co - Japan
2014
$
52,500
10,479
62,979
2013
$
54,900
10,200
65,100
ASIC class order 98/100 rounding of amounts
The Company is an entity to which ASIC Class Order 98/100 applies and, accordingly, amounts in the financial statements
and directors’ report have been rounded to the nearest dollar, unless otherwise indicated.
This concludes the remuneration report which has been audited.
Auditor’s independence declaration
The auditor’s independence declaration in accordance with section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001 for the year ended
30 June 2014 has been received and can be found on page 56 of the financial report.
This director’s report, incorporating the remuneration report, is signed in accordance with a resolution of the Board
of Directors.
Director
Dr David King
Dated this 29th day of August 2014
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 23
24 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
Corporate
Governance statement
Unless disclosed below, all the recommendations of the ASX Corporate Governance Council (including 2010 amendments)
have been applied for the entire financial year ended 30 June 2014 (ASX Principles).
Board Composition
The skills, experience and expertise relevant to the position of each director who is in office at the date of the annual report
and their term of office are detailed in the directors’ report.
The names of independent directors that have served on the board of directors of the company (Board) during the period are:
o David King
o Graeme Kaufman
o Martin Rogers
Independent directors are those who have the ability to exercise their duties unfettered by any business or other relationship
and are willing to express their opinions free of concern about their position or the position of any third party. The Board
does not believe it is possible to draft a list of criteria which is appropriate to characterise, in all circumstances, whether a
non-executive director is independent. However, in determining the independent status of a director the Board will consider
whether the director:
o
is a substantial shareholder of the Company or an officer of, or otherwise associated directly with, a substantial
shareholder of the Company;
o
is employed, or has previously been employed in an executive capacity by the Company or another group member;
o has within the last three years been a principal of a material professional adviser or a material consultant to the Company
or another group member, or an employee materially associated with the service provided;
o
is a material supplier or customer of the Company or another group member, or an officer of or otherwise associated
directly or indirectly with a material supplier or customer;
o has a material contractual relationship with the Company or another group member other than as a director.
In some cases the Board needs to make an assessment of the materiality of a relationship in order to determine if a direc-
tor is independent. A “material relationship” includes a direct or indirect interest or relationship that could reasonably be
considered to influence in a material way the director’s decisions in relation to the Company. When considering whether a
relationship is “material”, the Board will consider the materiality to each of the Company, the director and the person or or-
ganisation with which the director is related (as customer, supplier, or adviser). The Board has not set materiality thresholds,
considering it more effective to assess relationships on the individual circumstances applicable on a case by case basis and
where appropriate, with the assistance of external advice.
Independent directors have the right to seek independent professional advice in the furtherance of their duties as directors
at the Company’s expense. Written approval must be obtained from the Chairman prior to incurring any expense on behalf
of the Company.
David King, Graeme Kaufman and Martin Rogers are members of the nomination committee. These members have attend-
ed meetings of the nomination committee on an ad hoc basis as needed during the year. When appointing new directors,
the Board and the nomination committee look to ensure that an appropriate balance of skills, experience, expertise and
diversity is maintained. The Board has not approved a formal nomination committee charter and as such, no such charter
or summary of such charter is disclosed on the Company’s website.
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 25
Corporate Governance
Continued
Ethical Standards
The Board acknowledges and emphasises the importance of all directors and employees maintaining the highest stand-
ards of corporate governance practice and ethical conduct.
A code of conduct has been established requiring directors and employees to:
• act honestly and in good faith;
• exercise due care and diligence in fulfilling the functions of office;
• avoid conflicts and make full disclosure of any possible conflict of interest;
• comply with the law;
• encourage the reporting and investigating of unlawful and unethical behaviour; and
• comply with the share trading policy outlined in the code of conduct.
Directors are obliged to be independent in judgment and ensure all reasonable steps are taken to ensure due care is taken
by the Board in making sound decisions.
Diversity Policy
Diversity includes, but is not limited to, gender, age, ethnicity and cultural background. The Company is committed to
diversity and recognises the benefits arising from employee and Board diversity and the importance of benefiting from all
available talent.
Induction
All new directors participate in a formal induction process co-ordinated by the company secretary. This induction process
includes briefings on the Company’s financial, strategic, operational and risk management position, the Company’s govern-
ance framework and key developments in the Company and the industry and environment in which it operates.
The Board believes that the Company benefits from this diversity.
However, due to the size of the Company and small number of persons employed by the Company and its controlled enti-
ties, the Board has not established a formal diversity policy in accordance with Recommendation 3.2 of the ASX Principles.
As such and for the same reasons, the Company is not able to disclose in this annual report the measurable objectives for
achieving gender diversity in accordance with the diversity policy and progress towards achieving those objectives.
The Company is able to disclose the following gender diversity statistics for the Company and its controlled entities as at
the date of this annual report:
• women employees (67%);
• women in senior executive positions (57%); and
• women on the Board (25%).
Trading policy
The Company has a policy on the sale and purchase of its securities by its directors and employees. In addition, this policy
applies to advisers, contractors and consultants who may obtain confidential or price sensitive information in relation to
the Company.
The purpose of the policy is to avoid conduct known as ‘insider trading’. In some respects, the Company’s policy extends
beyond the strict requirements of the Corporations Act 200 1 (Cth) (Corporations Act).
26 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
Audit Committee
The names and qualifications of those appointed to the audit committee and their attendance at meetings of the committee
are included in the directors’ report.
CEO/CFO Declaration
As required by section 295A of the Corporations Act, the CEO and CFO have declared that in their opinion:
a. the financial records of the Company and controlled entities for the financial year have been properly maintained in
accordance with section 286 of the Corporations Act;
b. the financial statements and notes for the financial year comply with accounting standards;
c. the financial statements and notes for the financial year give a true and fair view of the financial position and performance
of the Company and its controlled entities in accordance section 297 of the Corporations Act;
d. any other matters prescribed by the Corporations Regulations in relation to the financial statements and notes for the
financial year have been satisfied.
In addition, in accordance with Recommendation 7.3 of the ASX Principles, the CEO and CFO stated to the Board that,
the declaration provided under section 295A of the Corporations Act is founded on a sound system of risk management
and internal control and that the system is operating effectively in all material respects in relation to financial reporting risks.
Performance Evaluation
An annual performance evaluation of the Board has not been made during the year.
A performance evaluation for the CEO has taken place during the financial year in accordance with the evaluation process
disclosed by the Company. This evaluation has been conducted by the Chairman on a quarterly basis during the year with
regard to performance measures set at the commencement of the year.
A performance evaluation for other senior management has been conducted by the CEO during the financial year in ac-
cordance with the evaluation process disclosed by the Company.
Board Roles and Responsibilities
The Board is first and foremost accountable to its shareholders through delivery of timely and balanced disclosures.
The Board sought external guidance to assist the drafting of its “Board Charter” which has been made publicly available on
the Company’s website. This document details the adopted practices and processes in relation to matters reserved for the
Board’s consideration and decision making. The Board is ultimately responsible for ensuring its actions are in accordance
with key corporate governance principles.
Shareholder Rights
Shareholders are entitled to vote on significant matters impacting on the business, which include the election and remu-
neration of directors and changes to the constitution. Shareholders are strongly encouraged to attend and participate in
the Annual General Meetings of the company, to lodge questions to be answered by the Board and/or the CEO, and are
able to appoint proxies.
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 27
Risk Management
The Board considers identification and management of key risks associated with the business as vital to maximise share-
holder wealth. A yearly assessment of the business’s risk profile is undertaken and reviewed by the Board, covering all
aspects of the business from the operational level through to strategic level risks. The CEO has been delegated the task
of implementing internal controls to identify and manage risks for which the Board provides oversight and is required to
report to the Board on whether such risks are being managed effectively. The effectiveness of the implemented internal
controls is monitored and reviewed regularly. During the year, the CEO has reported to the Board as to the effectiveness of
the Company’s management of its material business risks.
Remuneration Policies
The Company’s remuneration committee comprises of the following non-executive directors:
o David King (Chair, independent)
o Graeme Kaufman (independent)
o Martin Rogers (independent)
The remuneration committee reviews the senior executive packages annually by reference to Company performance, ex-
ecutive performance, comparable information from industry sectors and other listed companies and independent advice.
Executives may also be entitled to participate in the Company’s employee incentive plan.
The amounts of remuneration for all key management personnel for the Company, including all monetary and non monetary
components, are detailed in the directors’ report under the heading key management personnel compensation. All remu-
neration paid to executives is valued at the cost to the Company and expensed. Shares given to executives are valued as
the difference between the market price of those shares and the amount paid by the executive. Options are valued using
the Black Scholes methodology.
The Board expects that the remuneration structure implemented will result in the Company being able to attract and retain
the best executives to run the consolidated group. It will also provide executives with the necessary incentives to work to
grow long term shareholder value.
The payment of bonuses, options and other incentive payments are reviewed by the remuneration committee annually as
part of the review of executive remuneration and a recommendation is put to the Board for approval. All bonuses, options
and incentives must be linked to predetermined performance criteria. The Board can exercise its discretion in relation to
approving incentives, bonuses and options and can recommend changes to the committee’s recommendations. Any
changes must be justified by reference to measurable performance criteria.
Remuneration Committee
The names of the members of the remuneration committee and their attendance at meetings of the committee are detailed
in the directors’ report.
The Board has not approved a formal remuneration committee charter and as such, no such charter or summary of such
charter is disclosed on the Company’s website.
There are no schemes for retirement benefits other than statutory superannuation for non-executive directors.
28 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
financial
Report
31
32
33
34
35
69
70
Contents
Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Notes to the Financial Statements
Directors’ Declaration
Independent Auditor’s Report
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 29
Consolidated statement of
profit or Loss and Other
Comprehensive income
for the year ended 30 June 2014
Consolidated
Revenue
Other revenue
Other income
Less Expenditure
Cost of sales
Advertisement and marketing expense
Bad debts expense
Consultancy expenses
Conferences and meetings
Communication expenses
Depreciation and amortisation expense
Employee benefits expense
Finance costs
Gain/(Loss) on foreign exchange
Occupancy expenses
Professional fees
Research and development expenses
Share based compensation
Subscription expenses
Travel expenses
Other expenses
Loss before income tax
Income tax benefit
Loss for the year after income tax
Other comprehensive income, net of income tax
Note
3
3
3
2014
$
1,150,931
1,123,956
521,061
2,795,948
(333,085)
(257,763)
(978)
(452,376)
(150,653)
(88,982)
(112,140)
2013
$
541,649
55,597
164,042
761,288
(84,606)
(214,411)
(1,227)
(422,171)
(47,314)
(37,122)
(16,634)
(1,702,980)
(1,036,123)
(2,511)
(28,926)
(195,236)
(84,214)
(722,882)
(133,523)
(95,091)
(253,302)
(409,248)
(1,124)
13,338
(102,058)
(108,434)
(475,361)
(4,032)
(71,035)
(201,255)
(278,892)
(2,227,942)
(2,327,173)
5
747,106
785,866
(1,480,836)
(1,541,307)
Items that will be reclassified to profit or loss when specific conditions are met
Exchange differences on translating foreign controlled entities
Total comprehensive income for the year
Loss for the year attributable to:
Owners of Cellmid Limited
Non controlling interest
Total comprehensive income attributable to:
Owners of Cellmid Limited
Non controlling interest
(180,898)
216,257
(1,661,734)
(1,325,050)
(1,473,815)
(1,528,041)
(7,021)
(13,266)
(1,480,836)
(1,541,307)
(1,654,713)
(1,311,784)
(7,021)
(13,266)
(1,661,734)
(1,325,050)
Loss per share for loss attributable to the ordinary equity holders of the company
Basic loss per share (cents)
Diluted loss per share (cents)
9
9
(0.21)
(0.21)
(0.27)
(0.27)
The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements.
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 31
Consolidated statement of
financial position
As at 30 June 2014
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other receivables
Inventories
Other assets
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
NON CURRENT ASSETS
Plant and equipment
Intangible assets
TOTAL NON CURRENT ASSETS
TOTAL ASSETS
LIABILITIES
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Trade and other payables
Employee benefits
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
NON CURRENT LIABILITIES
Employee benefits
TOTAL NON CURRENT LIABILITIES
TOTAL LIABILITIES
NET ASSETS
EQUITY
Issued capital
Reserves
Accumulated losses
Capital and reserves attributable to owners of Cellmid Limited
Non controlling interest
TOTAL EQUITY
32 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
Consolidated
2014
$
2013
$
Note
10
11
12
15
13
14
16
17
17
18
19
2,501,753
220,471
1,709,365
68,302
1,754,994
255,695
1,694,926
73,321
4,499,891
3,778,936
43,269
1,911,265
1,954,534
6,454,425
51,633
2,163,150
2,214,783
5,993,719
563,183
166,254
729,437
61,262
61,262
790,699
5,663,726
501,299
134,755
636,054
52,508
52,508
688,562
5,305,157
27,401,832
25,336,522
1,705,205
1,966,375
(23,443,311)
(21,969,496)
5,663,726
-
5,663,726
5,333,401
(28,244)
5,305,157
Consolidated statement of
Changes in Equity
for the year ended 30 June 2014
y
t
i
u
q
E
l
a
t
o
T
s
t
s
e
r
e
t
n
I
l
a
t
o
T
n
o
N
g
n
i
l
l
o
r
t
n
o
c
d
e
t
a
l
s
e
s
s
o
L
-
u
m
u
c
c
A
i
n
g
e
r
o
F
e
v
r
e
s
e
R
e
g
n
a
h
c
x
E
e
r
a
h
S
d
e
s
a
B
l
a
r
e
n
e
G
e
v
r
e
s
e
R
e
v
r
e
s
e
R
s
t
n
e
m
y
a
P
e
v
r
e
s
e
R
n
o
i
t
i
s
u
q
c
A
i
d
e
u
s
s
I
l
a
t
i
p
a
C
e
t
o
N
4
2
5
,
4
7
0
3
5
,
8
7
1
,
2
)
0
2
2
,
3
1
1
(
-
-
-
)
1
3
5
,
9
1
1
(
5
6
2
,
5
3
4
2
5
,
4
7
0
3
5
,
8
7
1
,
2
)
0
2
2
,
3
1
1
(
)
6
9
7
,
4
5
1
(
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
)
6
3
8
,
0
8
4
,
1
(
)
1
2
0
,
7
(
)
5
1
8
,
3
7
4
,
1
(
)
5
1
8
,
3
7
4
,
1
(
-
)
8
9
8
,
0
8
1
(
-
)
8
9
8
,
0
8
1
(
-
)
8
9
8
,
0
8
1
(
)
,
4
3
7
1
6
6
1
,
(
)
1
2
0
,
7
(
)
,
3
1
7
4
5
6
1
(
,
)
5
1
8
,
3
7
4
,
1
(
)
8
9
8
,
0
8
1
(
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
2
5
,
4
7
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
7
5
1
,
5
0
3
,
5
)
4
4
2
,
8
2
(
1
0
4
,
3
3
3
,
5
)
6
9
4
,
9
6
9
,
1
2
(
7
5
2
,
6
1
2
5
5
8
,
2
2
3
6
2
,
7
2
7
,
1
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
2
2
5
,
6
3
3
,
5
2
3
1
0
2
y
u
J
1
l
t
a
e
c
n
a
a
B
l
-
-
-
-
0
3
5
8
7
1
,
,
2
)
0
2
2
3
1
1
,
(
9
1
e
m
o
c
n
i
i
e
v
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
c
r
e
h
t
O
i
e
v
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
c
l
a
t
o
T
r
a
e
y
e
h
t
r
o
f
e
m
o
c
n
i
r
e
t
f
a
r
a
e
y
e
h
t
r
o
f
s
s
o
L
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
i
l
s
r
e
d
o
h
y
t
i
u
q
e
h
t
i
w
s
n
o
i
t
c
a
s
n
a
r
T
9
1
8
1
n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c
d
e
s
a
b
e
r
a
h
S
e
h
t
g
n
i
r
u
d
d
e
u
s
s
i
s
e
r
a
h
S
s
t
s
o
c
n
o
i
t
c
a
s
n
a
r
T
r
a
e
y
)
6
9
7
,
4
5
1
(
-
9
1
g
n
i
l
l
o
r
t
n
o
c
n
o
n
i
e
s
n
g
o
c
e
r
e
D
t
s
e
r
e
t
n
i
6
2
7
,
3
6
6
5
,
-
6
2
7
3
6
6
,
,
5
)
1
1
3
,
3
4
4
,
3
2
(
9
5
3
,
5
3
5
5
8
,
2
2
7
8
7
,
1
0
8
,
1
)
6
9
7
,
4
5
1
(
2
3
8
,
1
0
4
,
7
2
4
1
0
2
e
n
u
J
0
3
t
a
e
c
n
a
a
B
l
4
8
4
,
9
8
0
,
2
)
8
7
9
,
4
1
(
2
6
4
,
4
0
1
,
2
)
5
5
4
,
1
4
4
,
0
2
(
)
7
0
3
,
1
4
5
,
1
(
)
6
6
2
,
3
1
(
)
1
4
0
,
8
2
5
,
1
(
)
1
4
0
,
8
2
5
,
1
(
-
-
3
3
0
,
4
0
9
6
,
6
3
5
,
4
-
-
3
3
0
,
4
0
9
6
,
6
3
5
,
4
-
-
-
-
7
5
2
,
6
1
2
-
7
5
2
,
6
1
2
-
7
5
2
,
6
1
2
)
,
0
5
0
5
2
3
1
,
(
)
6
6
2
,
3
1
(
)
,
4
8
7
1
1
3
1
(
,
)
1
4
0
,
8
2
5
,
1
(
7
5
2
,
6
1
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
3
0
,
4
5
5
8
,
2
2
0
3
2
,
3
2
7
,
1
7
5
1
,
5
0
3
5
,
)
4
4
2
,
8
2
(
1
0
4
,
3
3
3
,
5
)
6
9
4
,
9
6
9
,
1
2
(
7
5
2
,
6
1
2
5
5
8
,
2
2
3
6
2
,
7
2
7
,
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
3
8
,
9
9
7
,
0
2
2
1
0
2
l
y
u
J
1
t
a
e
c
n
a
a
B
l
-
-
-
-
0
9
6
,
6
3
5
4
,
9
1
e
m
o
c
n
i
i
e
v
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
c
r
e
h
t
O
i
e
v
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
c
l
a
t
o
T
e
m
o
c
n
i
r
e
t
f
a
r
a
e
y
e
h
t
r
o
f
s
s
o
L
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
i
l
s
r
e
d
o
h
y
t
i
u
q
e
h
t
i
w
s
n
o
i
t
c
a
s
n
a
r
T
8
1
9
1
n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c
d
e
s
a
b
e
r
a
h
S
y
t
i
u
q
e
f
o
n
o
i
t
u
b
i
r
t
n
o
C
2
2
5
,
6
3
3
,
5
2
3
1
0
2
e
n
u
J
0
3
t
a
e
c
n
a
a
B
l
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 33
Consolidated statement of
Cash flows
for the year ended 30 June 2014
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Receipts from customers (inclusive of GST)
Payments to suppliers and employees (inclusive of GST)
Research and development expenses
Interest received
Income tax benefit
Other grant income
Finance costs
Consolidated
2014
$
2013
$
Note
1,856,193
644,080
(4,268,421)
(2,552,229)
(722,882)
(475,361)
52,026
754,233
91,542
(2,496)
30,833
785,866
115,167
(1,124)
Net cash used in operating activities
20
(2,239,805)
(1,452,768)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Payment for acquisition of subsidiary, net of cash acquired
Proceeds on sale of financial asset
Purchase of non current assets
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from issue of shares (net of share issue costs)
Net cash provided by financing activities
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents held
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of financial year
Effect of exchange rate changes
-
(803,911)
1,000,260
(3,259)
997,001
91,785
(26,734)
(738,860)
2,006,313
2,006,313
2,864,561
2,864,561
763,509
672,933
1,754,994
1,050,593
(16,750)
31,468
Cash and cash equivalents at end of financial year
10
2,501,753
1,754,994
34 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
notes to the
financial statements
Contents
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
2. Parent Information
3. Revenue and Other Income
4. Profit/(Loss) for the year
5.
Income Tax Expense
6. Business Combinations
7.
Interests of Key Management Personnel (KMP)
8. Auditor’s Remuneration
9. Earnings per Share
10. Cash and Cash Equivalents
11. Trade and Other Receivables
12.
Inventories
13. Plant and Equipment
14.
Intangible Assets
15. Other Assets
16. Trade and Other Payables
17. Provisions
18. Contributed Equity
19. Reserves
20. Cash Flow Information
21. Events after the Reporting Period
22. Related Party Transactions
23. Financial Risk Management
24.
Interests in Subsidiaries
25. Segment Information
26. Commitments
27. Contingent liabilities and Contingent assets
28. Share Based Payments
29. Company Details
36
47
48
48
49
51
52
52
53
53
54
54
54
55
56
56
56
57
59
60
60
60
61
63
63
64
65
65
66
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 35
notes to the financial statements
Continued
NOTE 1: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Statement of compliance
The Company is a public company, listed on the Australian Stock Exchange. It is incorporated in Australia and is domiciled
in Australia.
The financial statements are general purpose financial statements that have been prepared in accordance with Austral-
ian Accounting Standards, Australian Accounting Interpretations, other authoritative pronouncements of the Australian
Accounting Standards Board and the Corporations Act 2001, as appropriate for profit oriented entities. These financial
statements also comply with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Stand-
ards Board (IASB)
The financial statements comprise the consolidated financial statements of the Group.
The financial statements were authorised for issue by the directors on 29 August 2014.
Basis of Preparation
The financial statements have been prepared on an accruals basis and are based on historical costs, except for certain
non current assets and financial instruments that are measured at re-valued amounts or fair values, as explained in the
accounting policies below. Historical cost is generally based on the fair values of the consideration given in exchange for
assets. All amounts are presented in Australian dollars, unless otherwise noted.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with AIFRS requires the use of certain accounting estimates. It also
requires management to exercise its judgement in the process of applying the group’s accounting policies. The areas
involving a higher degree of judgement or complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the
financial statements, are disclosed in Note 1(w).
New, revised or amending Accounting Standards and Interpretations adopted
During the current year, the following standards became mandatory and have been adopted retrospectively by the Group:
• AASB 10 Consolidated Financial Statements
• AASB 11 Joint Arrangements
• AASB 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities
• AASB 13 Fair Value Measurement
• AASB 119 Employee Benefits
• AASB 127 Separate Financial Statements
• AASB 2011 4 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards to Remove Individual Key Management Personnel
Disclosure Requirements [AASB 124]
• AASB 2011 7 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from the Consolidation and Joint Arrangements
Standards [AASB 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 101, 107, 112, 118, 121, 124, 132, 133, 136, 138, 139, 1023 & 1038 and Interpreta-
tions 5, 9, 16 & 17]
• AASB 2012 9 Amendments to AASB 1048 arising from the Withdrawal of Australian Interpretation 1039
• AASB 2012 2 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards Disclosures Offsetting Financial Assets and
36 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
Financial Liabilities
The accounting policies have been updated to reflect changes in the recognition and measurement of assets, liabilities,
income and expenses and the impact of adoption of these standards is discussed below.
AASB 10 Consolidated Financial Statements is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013
and therefore the Group has applied it for the first time in these financial statements. AASB 10 includes a new definition of
control, including additional guidance for specific situations such as control in a principal / agent situation and when holding
less than majority voting rights may give control. AASB 10 supersedes the previous requirements of AASB 127 Consoli-
dated and Separate Financial Statements and Interpretation 112 Consolidation Special Purpose Entities and resulted in
consequential amendments to a number of other standards.
The Group has reviewed its investment in other entities to determine whether any changes were required to the Group
under AASB 10. The composition of the Group is the same under AASB 10 and therefore there is no change to the reported
financial position and performance.
AASB 11 Joint Arrangements replaces AASB 131 Interests in Joint Ventures and Interpretation 112 Jointly Controlled Enti-
ties Nonmonetary Contributions by Venturers as well as consequential amendments to a number of other standards. AASB
11 uses the revised definition of control from AASB 10 and once joint control is determined, then classifies joint arrange-
ments as either joint ventures or joint operations. Joint ventures are accounted for using the equity method, proportionate
consolidation is not permitted under AASB 11. Joint operations are accounted for by incorporating the venturer’s share of
assets, liabilities, income and expenses into the financial statements. There were no changes to the accounting for joint
arrangements under AASB 11.
AASB 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities includes all disclosures relating to an entity’s interest in associates, joint
arrangements, subsidiaries and structured entities. On adoption of AASB 12, additional disclosures have been included in
the financial statements in relation to investments held.
AASB 13 Fair Value Measurement does not change what and when assets or liabilities are recorded at fair value. It provides
guidance on how to measure assets and liabilities at fair value, including the concept of highest and best use for nonfinan-
cial assets. AASB 13 has not had an impact on the Group as no assets or liabilities are held at fair value.
AASB 119 Employee benefits changes the basis for determining the income or expense relating to defined benefit plans
and introduces revised definitions for short-term employee benefits and termination benefits.
The Group reviewed the annual leave liability to determine the level of annual leave which is expected to be paid more than
12 months after the end of the reporting period. Whilst this has been considered to be a long-term employee benefits for
the purpose of measuring the leave under AASB 119, the effect of discounting was not considered to be material and
therefore has not been performed.
AASB 2011 4 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards to Remove Individual Key Management Personnel Disclo-
sure Requirements [AASB 124] to Remove Individual Key Management Personnel Disclosure Requirements removes the
individual key management personnel (KMP) disclosures contained in Aus paragraphs 29.1 to 29.9.3.
The individual disclosures are not required by either AASB 124’s international equivalent IAS 24 Related Parties (which
requires only aggregate, rather than individual, amounts of KMP compensation) or its New Zealand equivalent. In addition,
the AASB believes that these disclosures are more in the nature of governance and so are better dealt with as part of the
Corporations Act 2001.
As a result, the detailed individual KMP remuneration has been removed from Note 6. In accordance with the transition
provisions in the standard, the comparative figures have been restated.
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 37
notes to the financial statements
Continued
a. Going Concern
The Directors have prepared the financial statements on a going concern basis, which contemplates continuity of normal
business activities and the realisation of assets and the settlement of liabilities in the ordinary course of business. Based on
anticipated levels of operational cash flow, the Group has sufficient cash to fund current operations for more than one year.
b. Principles of Consolidation
Subsidiaries are all those entities over which the consolidated entity has control. The consolidated entity controls an entity
when the consolidated entity is exposed to, or has rights to, variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has
the ability to affect those returns through its power to direct the activities of the entity. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated
from the date on which control is transferred to the consolidated entity. They are de-consolidated from the date that control
ceases.
Intercompany transactions, balances and unrealised gains on transactions between entities in the consolidated entity are
eliminated. Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of the impairment of the asset
transferred. Accounting policies of subsidiaries have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the poli-
cies adopted by the consolidated entity.
The acquisition of subsidiaries is accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. A change in ownership inter-
est, without the loss of control, is accounted for as an equity transaction, where the difference between the consideration
transferred and the book value of the share of the non-controlling interest acquired is recognised directly in equity attribut-
able to the parent.
Non-controlling interest in the results and equity of subsidiaries are shown separately in the statement of profit or loss and
other comprehensive income, statement of financial position and statement of changes in equity of the consolidated entity.
Losses incurred by the consolidated entity are attributed to the non-controlling interest in full, even if that results in a deficit
balance.
Where the consolidated entity loses control over a subsidiary, it derecognises the assets including goodwill, liabilities and
non-controlling interest in the subsidiary together with any cumulative translation differences recognised in equity. The con-
solidated entity recognises the fair value of the consideration received and the fair value of any investment retained together
with any gain or loss in profit or loss.
c. Segment Reporting
Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision
maker. The chief operating decision makers, who are responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of
the operating segments, is the Board of Directors.
d. Revenue and Other Income Recognition
Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable and after taking into account any trade
discounts and volume rebates allowed. Revenue from the sale of goods is recognised at the point of delivery as this cor-
responds to the transfer of significant risks and rewards of ownership of the goods and the cessation of all involvement in
those goods.
Interest revenue is recognised using the effective interest rate method.
Royalties determined on a time basis are recognised on a straight line basis over the period of the agreement. Government
grants are recognised in profit or loss on a systematic basis over the periods in which the Group recognises as expenses
the related costs for which the grants are intended to compensate, but not before the receipt of the grant is relatively certain.
38 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
e. Income Tax
The income tax expense (revenue) for the period is the tax payable on the current period’s taxable income based on the
national income tax rate for each jurisdiction adjusted by changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities attributable to tem-
porary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the financial statements,
and to unused tax losses.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the period when the asset is
realised or the liability is settled and their measurement also reflects the manner in which management expects to recover
or settle the carrying amount of the related asset or liability.
Deferred tax assets relating to temporary differences and unused tax losses are recognised only to the extent that it is prob-
able that future taxable profit will be available against which the benefits of the deferred tax asset can be utilised.
Current tax assets and liabilities are offset where a legally enforceable right of set off exists and it is intended that net set-
tlement or simultaneous realisation and settlement of the respective asset and liability will occur. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are offset where: (a) a legally enforceable right of set off exists; and (b) the deferred tax assets and liabilities relate
to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority on either the same taxable entity or different taxable entities where
it is intended that net settlement or simultaneous realisation and settlement of the respective asset and liability will occur
in future periods in which significant amounts of deferred tax assets or liabilities are expected to be recovered or settled.
f. Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, deposits available on demand with banks, other short term highly liquid
investments with original maturities of three months or less, and bank overdrafts. Bank overdrafts are reported within short
term borrowings in current liabilities in the consolidated statement of financial position.
g. Trade and Other Receivables
Receivables are recognised initially at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost, less provision for doubt-
ful debts.
Collectability of receivables is reviewed on an ongoing basis. Debts which are known to be uncollectible are written off. A
provision for doubtful receivables is established when there is objective evidence that the Group will not be able to collect
all amounts due according to the original terms of receivables.
h. Inventories
Inventories are measured at the lower of cost and net realisable value. The cost of manufactured products includes direct
materials, direct labour and an appropriate portion of variable and fixed overheads. Overheads are applied on the basis of
normal operating capacity. Costs are assigned on the basis of weighted average costs. Costs of purchased inventory are
determined after deducting rebates and realisable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less
the estimated costs of completion and the estimated cost necessary to make the sale.
i. Plant and Equipment
Plant and equipment are measured on the cost basis and therefore carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and any
accumulated impairment.
The cost of fixed assets constructed within the Group includes the cost of materials, direct labour, borrowing costs and an
appropriate proportion of fixed and variable overheads.
Subsequent costs are included in the asset’s carrying amount or recognised as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when
it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Group and the cost of the item can be
measured reliably. All other repairs and maintenance are charged to the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive
income during the financial period in which they are incurred
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 39
notes to the financial statements
Continued
Depreciation
The depreciable amount of all fixed assets is depreciated on a straight line basis over the asset’s useful life to the Group
commencing from the time the asset is held ready for use. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of
either the unexpired period of the lease or the estimated useful lives of the improvements.
The depreciation rates used for each class of depreciable asset are :
Class of Fixed Asset
Furniture and fittings
Office equipment
Depreciation Rate
20%
6.7-33.33%
The assets’ residual values and useful lives are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at the end of each reporting period.
An asset’s carrying amount is written down immediately to its recoverable amount if the asset’s carrying amount is greater
than its estimated recoverable amount.
Gains and losses on disposals are determined by comparing proceeds with the carrying amount. These gains and losses
are included in the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income. When revalued assets are sold, amounts
included in the revaluation surplus relating to that asset are transferred to retained earnings.
j.
Investments and Other Financial Assets
The Group classified its investments in the following categories: loans and receivables and available for sale financial assets.
The classification depends on the nature and purpose of the investment and is determined at the time of initial recognition.
(i) Loans and receivables
Loans and receivables are non derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in
an active market and are subsequently measured at amortised cost.
Loans and receivables are included in current assets, where they are expected to mature within 12 months after the
end of the reporting period.
Loan and receivables are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method, less any impairment. Interest
income is recognised by applying the effective interest rate, except for short term receivables when the recognition of
interest would be immaterial.
k. Intangibles other than Goodwill
Patents and trademarks
Patents and trademarks are recognised at cost of acquisition. Patents and trademarks have a finite life and are carried at
cost less any accumulated amortisation and any impairment losses. The Group has determined the useful life of the intan-
gible assets at 20 years. There is no amortisation charge to the intangible assets in the 2013 financial year.
Research and development
Expenditure on research activities is recognised as an expense in the period in which is incurred.
Expenditure on development projects (relating to the design and testing of new or improved products) are capitalised as
intangible assets when it is probable that the project will be a success considering its commercial and technical feasibility
and its costs can be measured reliably. The expenditure capitalised comprises all directly attributable costs, including costs
of materials, services, direct labour and an appropriate proportion of overheads. Development expenditures that do not
meet these criteria are recognised as an expense as incurred. Development costs previously recognised as an expense are
not recognised as an asset in a subsequent period.
40 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
l.
Impairment of Assets
At the end of each reporting period, the Group assesses whether there is any indication that an asset may be impaired.
The assessment will include the consideration of external and internal sources of information including dividends received
from subsidiaries, associates or jointly controlled entities deemed to be out of pre acquisition profits. If such an indication
exists, an impairment test is carried out on the asset by comparing the recoverable amount of the asset, being the higher
of the asset’s fair value less costs to sell and value in use, to the asset’s carrying amount. Any excess of the asset’s carrying
amount over its recoverable amount is recognised immediately in profit or loss, unless the asset is carried at a re-valued
amount in accordance with another Standard (e.g. in accordance with the revaluation model in AASB 116). Any impairment
loss of a re-valued asset is treated as a revaluation decrease in accordance with that other Standard.
Where it is not possible to estimate the recoverable amount of an individual asset, the Group estimates the recoverable
amount of the cash generating unit to which the asset belongs.
Impairment testing is performed annually for goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives
m. Trade and Other Payables
These amounts represent liabilities for goods and services provided to the Group prior to the end of financial year which are
unpaid. The amounts are unsecured and are usually paid within 30 days of recognition.
n. Provisions
Provisions are recognised when the Group has a legal or constructive obligation, as a result of past events, for which it is
probable that an outflow of economic benefits will result and that outflow can be reliably measured.
Provisions are measured using the best estimate of the amounts required to settle the obligation at the end of the reporting
period.
o. Employee Benefits
Provision is made for the Company’s liability for employee benefits arising from services rendered by employees to the
end of the reporting period. Employee benefits that are expected to be settled within one year have been measured at the
amounts expected to be paid when the liability is settled. In determining the liability, consideration is given to employee
wage increases and the probability that the employee may satisfy vesting requirements.
Short term employee benefits
Liability for wages and salaries, including non monetary benefits, annual leave, long service leave and accumulating sick
leave expected to be settled within 12 months of the reporting date are recognised in other payables in respect of employ-
ees’ services up to the reporting date and are measured at the amounts expected to be paid when the liabilities are settled.
Other long term employee benefits
Liability for annual leave and long service leave is recognised in the provision for employee benefits and measured as the
present value of expected future payments to be made in respect of services provided by employees up to the reporting
date using the projected unit credit method. Consideration is given to expected future wage and salary levels, experience
of employee departures and period of service.
Retirement benefit obligations
Contributions to the defined contribution fund are recognised as an expense as they become payable. Prepaid contribu-
tions are recognised as an asset to the extent that a cash refund or a reduction in the future payment is available. Contribu-
tions are paid into the fund nominated by the employee.
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 41
notes to the financial statements
Continued
Share based payments
The fair value of options granted is recognised as a benefit expense with a corresponding increase in equity. The fair value
is measured at grant date and recognised over the period during which the directors and executives become uncondition-
ally entitled to the options.
The fair value at grant date is determined using binomial option pricing model that takes into account the exercise price,
the term of option, the impact of dilution, the share price at grant date and expected price volatility of the underlying share,
the expected dividend yield and the risk free interest rate for the term of the option.
The fair value of the options granted is adjusted to reflect market vesting conditions, but excludes the impact of any non-
market vesting conditions. Non-market vesting conditions are included in assumptions about the number of options that
are expected to become exercisable. The benefit expense recognised each period takes into account the most recent
estimate.
Upon the exercise of options, the balance of the share based payments reserve relating to those options is transferred to
share capital and the proceeds received, net of any directly attributable transaction costs, are credited to share capital.
p. Equity settled compensation
The Group operates an employee share ownership plan. Share based payments to employees are measured at the fair
value of the instruments issued and amortised over the vesting periods. Share based payments to non-employees are
measured at the fair value of goods or services received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, if it is determined
the fair value of the goods or services cannot be reliably measured, and are recorded at the date the goods or services are
received. The corresponding amount is recorded to the option reserve. The fair value of options is determined using the
binominal pricing model. The number of shares and options expected to vest is reviewed and adjusted at the end of each
reporting period such that the amount recognised for services received as consideration for the equity instruments granted
is based on the number of equity instruments that eventually vest.
Upon the exercise of options, the balance of the share based payments reserve relating to those options is transferred to
share capital and the proceeds received, net of any directly attributable transaction costs, are credited to share capital.
q. Functional and Presentation Currency
The functional currency of each of the Group’s entities is measured using the currency of the primary economic environ-
ment in which that entity operates. The consolidated financial statements are presented in Australian dollars which is the
parent entity’s functional and presentation currency.
Foreign currency transactions
Foreign currency transactions are translated into Australian dollars using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the
transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation
at financial year end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognised in
profit or loss.
Foreign operations
The assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated into Australian dollars using the exchange rates at the reporting
date. The revenues and expenses of foreign operations are translated into Australian dollars using the average exchange
rates, which approximate the rate at the date of the transaction, for the period. All resulting foreign exchange differences
are recognised in other comprehensive income through the foreign currency reserve in equity.
The foreign currency reserve is recognised in profit or loss when the foreign operation or net investment is disposed.
42 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
r. Goods and Services Tax (GST)
Revenue, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of goods and services tax (GST), except where the
amount of GST incurred is not recoverable from the Australian Taxation Office (ATO).
Receivables and payable are stated inclusive of GST receivable or payable. The net amount of GST recoverable from, or
payable to, the ATO is included with other receivables or payables in the consolidated statement of financial position.
Cash flows are presented on a gross basis. The GST components of cash flows arising from investing or financing activi-
ties which are recoverable from, or payable to, the ATO are presented as operating cash flows included in receipts from
customers or payments to suppliers
s. Business Combinations
The acquisition method of accounting is used to account for business combinations regardless of whether equity instru-
ments or other assets are acquired.
The consideration transferred is the sum of the acquisition date fair values of the assets transferred, equity instruments
issued or liabilities incurred by the acquirer to former owners of the acquiree and the amount of any non-controlling inter-
est in the acquiree. For each business combination, the non-controlling interest in the acquiree is measured at either fair
value or at the proportionate share of the acquiree’s identifiable net assets. All acquisition costs are expensed as incurred
to profit or loss.
On the acquisition of a business, the Group assesses the financial assets acquired and liabilities assumed for appropriate
classification and designation in accordance with the contractual terms, economic conditions, the Group’s operating or
accounting policies and other pertinent conditions in existence at the acquisition date.
Where the business combination is achieved in stages, the Group remeasures its previously held equity interest in the
acquiree at the acquisition date fair value and the difference between the fair value and the previous carrying amount is
recognised in profit or loss.
Contingent consideration to be transferred by the acquirer is recognised at the acquisition date fair value. Subsequent
changes in the fair value of contingent consideration classified as an asset or liability is recognised in profit or loss. Con-
tingent consideration classified as equity is not remeasured and its subsequent settlement is accounted for within equity.
The difference between the acquisition date fair value of assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any non-controlling inter-
est in the acquiree and the fair value of the consideration transferred and the fair value of any pre-existing investment in
the acquiree is recognised as goodwill. If the consideration transferred and the pre-existing fair value is less than the fair
value of the identifiable net assets acquired, being a bargain purchase to the acquirer, the difference is recognised as a
gain directly in profit or loss by the acquirer on the acquisition date, but only after a reassessment of the identification and
measurement of the net assets acquired, the non-controlling interest in the acquiree, if any, the consideration transferred
and the acquirer’s previously held equity interest in the acquirer.
Business combinations are initially accounted for on a provisional basis. The acquirer retrospectively adjusts the provisional
amounts recognised and also recognises additional assets or liabilities during the measurement period, based on new
information obtained about the facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date. The measurement period ends
on either the earlier of (i) 12 months from the date of the acquisition or (ii) when the acquirer receives all the information
possible to determine fair value.
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 43
notes to the financial statements
Continued
t. Earnings per share
Basic earnings per share
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the profit attributable to owners of Cellmid Limited, excluding any costs
of servicing equity other than ordinary shares, by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the
financial year, adjusted for bonus elements in ordinary shares issued during the financial year.
Diluted earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share adjusts the figures used in the determination of basic earnings per share to take into account
the after income tax effect of interest and other financing costs associated with dilutive potential ordinary shares and the
weighted average number of shares assumed to have been issued for no consideration in relation to dilutive potential
ordinary shares.
u. Comparative Figures
When required by Accounting Standards, comparative figures have been adjusted to conform to changes in presentation
for the current financial year.
Where the group has retrospectively applied an accounting policy, made a retrospective restatement of items in the financial
statements or reclassified items in its financial statements, an additional statement of financial position as at the beginning
of the earliest comparative period will be disclosed.
v. New Accounting Standards for Application in Future Periods
Australian Accounting Standards and Interpretations that have recently been issued or amended but are not yet
mandatory, have not been early adopted by the consolidated entity for the annual reporting period ended 30 June 2014.
The consolidated entity’s assessment of the impact of these new or amended Accounting Standards and Interpretations,
most relevant to the consolidated entity, are set out below.
- AASB 2 Share-Based Payment
This standard and its consequential amendments are applicable to annual reporting periods for which Share-based
payment transactions for grant dates on or after 1 July 2014. There will be no impact on these financial statements
when these amendments are first adopted as they apply prospectively to share-based payment transactions for which
the grant date is on or after 1 July 2014.
- AASB 8 Operating Segments
This standard and its consequential amendments are applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1
July 2014. There will be no impact on the financial statements when these amendments are first adopted because
this is a disclosure standard only. Further, because the Group does not currently aggregate operating segments in
determining reportable segments, it is unlikely that any additional disclosures will be required when this amendment is
adopted for the first time for the year ended 30 June 2015.
- AASB 124 Related Party Disclosures
This standard and its consequential amendments are applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1
July 2014. The amendment clarifies that an entity that provides key management personnel services (‘management
entity’) to a reporting entity (or to the parent of the reporting entity), is a related party of the reporting entity. The amend-
ment also requires separate disclosure of amounts recognised as an expense for key management personnel services
provided by a separate management entity (but not in the categories set out in AASB 124.17) There will be no impact
on these financial statements when these amendments are first adopted because this is a disclosure standard only. As
the group does not currently engage the services of a management entity, it is also unlikely that any additional disclo-
sures will be required when this amendment is adopted for the first time for the year ended 30 June 2015.
44 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
- AASB 9 Financial Instruments and its consequential amendments
This standard and its consequential amendments are applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1
January 2017 and completes phases I and III of the IASB’s project to replace IAS 39 (AASB 139) ‘Financial Instru-
ments: Recognition and Measurement’. This standard introduces new classification and measurement models for
financial assets, using a single approach to determine whether a financial asset is measured at amortised cost or fair
value. The accounting for financial liabilities continues to be classified and measured in accordance with AASB 139,
with one exception, being that the portion of a change of fair value relating to the entity’s own credit risk is to be pre-
sented in other comprehensive income unless it would create an accounting mismatch. Chapter 6 ‘Hedge Accounting’
supersedes the general hedge accounting requirements in AASB 139 and provides a new simpler approach to hedge
accounting that is intended to more closely align with risk management activities undertaken by entities when hedging
financial and non-financial risks. The consolidated entity will adopt this standard and the amendments from 1 July 2017
but the impact of its adoption is yet to be assessed by the consolidated entity.
- AASB 2013-3 Amendments to AASB 136 - Recoverable Amount Disclosures for Non-Financial Assets
These amendments are applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2014. The disclosure
requirements of AASB 136 ‘Impairment of Assets’ have been enhanced to require additional information about the fair
value measurement when the recoverable amount of impaired assets is based on fair value less costs of disposals.
Additionally, if measured using a present value technique, the discount rate is required to be disclosed. The adoption
of these amendments from 1 July 2014 may increase the disclosures by the consolidated entity.
Annual Improvements to IFRSs 2010-2012 Cycle
These amendments are applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 July 2014 and affects several
Accounting Standards as follows: Amends the definition of ‘vesting conditions’ and ‘market condition’ and adds defini-
tions for ‘performance condition’ and ‘service condition’ in AASB 2 ‘Share-based Payment’; Amends AASB 3 ‘Business
Combinations’ to clarify that contingent consideration that is classified as an asset or liability shall be measured at fair value
at each reporting date; Amends AASB 8 ‘Operating Segments’ to require entities to disclose the judgements made by
management in applying the aggregation criteria; Clarifies that AASB 8 only requires a reconciliation of the total reportable
segments assets to the entity’s assets, if the segment assets are reported regularly; Clarifies that the issuance of AASB
13 ‘Fair Value Measurement’ and the amending of AASB 139 ‘Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement’ and
AASB 9 ‘Financial Instruments’ did not remove the ability to measure short-term receivables and payables with no stated
interest rate at their invoice amount, if the effect of discounting is immaterial; Clarifies that in AASB 116 ‘Property, Plant
and Equipment’ and AASB 138 ‘Intangible Assets’, when an asset is revalued the gross carrying amount is adjusted in a
manner that is consistent with the revaluation of the carrying amount (i.e. proportional restatement of accumulated amor-
tisation); and Amends AASB 124 ‘Related Party Disclosures’ to clarify that an entity providing key management personnel
services to the reporting entity or to the parent of the reporting entity is a ‘related party’ of the reporting entity. The adoption
of these amendments from 1 July 2014 will not have a material impact on the consolidated entity.
Annual Improvements to IFRSs 2011-2013 Cycle
These amendments are applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 July 2014 and affects four
Accounting Standards as follows: Clarifies the ‘meaning of effective IFRSs’ in AASB 1 ‘First-time Adoption of Australian
Accounting Standards’; Clarifies that AASB 3 ‘Business Combination’ excludes from its scope the accounting for the
formation of a joint arrangement in the financial statements of the joint arrangement itself; Clarifies that the scope of the
portfolio exemption in AASB 13 ‘Fair Value Measurement’ includes all contracts accounted for within the scope of AASB
139 ‘Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement’ or AASB 9 ‘Financial Instruments’, regardless of whether they
meet the definitions of financial assets or financial liabilities as defined in AASB 132 ‘Financial Instruments: Presentation’;
and Clarifies that determining whether a specific transaction meets the definition of both a business combination as defined
in AASB 3 ‘Business Combinations’ and investment property as defined in AASB 140 ‘Investment Property’ requires the
separate application of both standards independently of each other. The adoption of these amendments from 1 July 2014
will not have a material impact on the consolidated entity.
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 45
notes to the financial statements
Continued
w. Critical accounting estimates and judgements
Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including
expectations of future events that may have a financial impact on the entity and that are believed to be reasonable under
the circumstances.
The preparation of the financial statements requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts in the financial statements. Management continually evaluates its judgements and estimates in
relation to assets, liabilities, contingent liabilities, revenue and expenses. Management bases its judgements, estimates and
assumptions on historical experience and on other various factors, including expectations of future events, management
believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. The resulting accounting judgements and estimates will seldom equal
the related actual results. The judgements, estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of causing a material
adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities (refer to the respective notes) within the next financial year are
discussed below.
Estimated impairment of intellectual property
The Group tests annually whether intellectual property has suffered any impairment, in accordance with the accounting
policy stated in note 1. The recoverable amounts of the intellectual property have been determined based on reviewing the
status of the research and development program, progress on its patent applications and projected cash flow calculations.
These calculations require the use of assumptions, including estimating timing of cash flows, product development and
availability of resources to exploit the assets.
x. Correction of prior period error
The acquisition of the remaining non-controlling interest in Advangen International Pty Limited as discussed in note 19
occurred on 25th November 2013. This transaction was incorrectly recorded and disclosed in the Interim Financial Report
for the period ended 31 December 2013. The transaction has been retrospectively adjusted in the financial records of the
Group.
The impact of the adjustment to correct the error is noted in the below table:
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
Goodwill
EQUITY
Acquisition reserve
As stated in 31
December 2013
interim report
Adjustment
Restated per
30 June 2014
report
$
$
154,796
(154,796)
$
-
-
(154,796)
(154,796)
As the transaction occurred during the period 31 December 2013, no adjustment is necessary to the comparative balances
stated in the 30 June 2014 financial report.
46 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
NOTE 2: PARENT INFORMATION
The following information has been extracted from the books and records of the parent, Cellmid Limited and Controlled
Entities and has been prepared in accordance with Accounting Standards.
The financial information for the parent entity, Cellmid Limited and Controlled Entities has been prepared on the same basis
as the consolidated financial statements except as disclosed below.
Investments in subsidiaries
Investments in subsidiaries are accounted for at cost in the financial statements of the parent entity. Dividends received
from associates are recognised in the parent entity profit or loss, rather than being deducted from the carrying amount of
these investments.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
ASSETS
Current assets
Non-current assets
TOTAL ASSETS
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
TOTAL LIABILITIES
EQUITY
Contributed equity
Accumulated losses
Share based payment reserve
TOTAL EQUITY
STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Loss of the parent entity
Total comprehensive income
2014
$
2013
$
4,813,472
3,047,883
7,861,355
2,500,986
3,777,714
6,278,700
(579,055)
(61,262)
(640,317)
480,084
52,508
532,592
27,401,832
25,336,522
(21,982,582)
(21,317,677)
1,801,788
7,221,038
1,727,263
5,746,108
664,905
664,905
1,173,677
1,173,677
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 47
notes to the financial statements
Continued
NOTE 3: REVENUE AND OTHER INCOME
Consolidated Group
2014
$
2013
$
1,150,931
541,649
52,054
1,009,188
26,220
36,494
1,123,956
2,274,887
91,542
429,519
521,061
30,833
358
24,000
406
55,597
597,246
115,167
48,875
164,042
Consolidated Group
2014
$
2013
$
(333,085)
(2,511)
(82,138)
(28,926)
(179,986)
(112,140)
(722,882)
(84,606)
(1,124)
(71,879)
13,338
(95,842)
(16,634)
(475,361)
Revenue from continuing operations
Sales revenue:
– sale of goods
Other revenue:
– interest received
– licence fees and royalties
– rental revenue
– other revenue
Total Revenue
Other income:
– Government grants
– Gain on disposal of financial asset
Total other income
NOTE 4: LOSS FOR THE YEAR
Loss before income tax from continuing operations includes the following
specific expenses:
Cost of sales
Finance costs
Defined contribution superannuation expenses
(Loss)/Gain on foreign exchange
Minimum lease payments
Depreciation and amortisation expense
Research and development expenses
48 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
NOTE 5: INCOME TAx
a. The major components of income tax benefit comprise:
– Income tax benefit
Consolidated Group
2014
$
2013
$
747,106
747,106
785,866
785,866
b. Numerical reconciliation of income tax benefit to accounting loss:
Loss for year before income tax benefit
(2,227,942)
(2,327,173)
Prima facie tax benefit on loss from ordinary activities before income tax at
31.11% (30.0% in 2013)1
Add / (less) tax effect of:
– Share based payment
– Sundry items
– Research and development expenditure
– Research and development core technology expenditure
(692,936)
(698,152)
40,057
32,445
669,972
(190,438)
1,210
6,406
396,695
(190,438)
Tax losses not brought to account
147,826
484,279
Adjusted income tax expense
(6,926)
-
Less: research and development tax benefit for the financial year2
754,032
785,866
Income tax benefit
747,106
785,866
1.
The Group operates across two tax jurisdictions being Australia and Japan each with difference corporate tax
rates. The applied tax rate of 31.11% represents the average tax rate applicable to the Group for the financial
year ended 30 June 2014.
2. A $754,032 ($785,866 in 2013) research and development tax offset was received for a claim in accordance
with the Commonwealth Government’s Research and Development Tax Incentive.
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 49
notes to the financial statements
Continued
(c) Unused tax losses
Movements in unused tax losses
Carried forward unused tax losses at the beginning of the
financial year
Current unused tax losses for which no deferred tax asset
has been recognised
Tax losses applied to net taxable income for the period
Prior period differences between tax calculation and income
tax return
Carried forward unused tax losses at the end of the
financial year
Notional tax rate
Potential future tax benefit
This income tax benefit arising from tax losses will only be realised if:
Australia
$
Japan
$
Total
$
13,467,581
1,566,188
15,033,769
-
435,350
435,350
(47,754)
(416,139)
-
-
(47,754)
(416,139)
13,003,688
2,001,538
15,005,226
30.00%
3,901,106
35.64%
713,348
4,614,454
i.
ii.
iii.
the Group derives future assessable income of a nature and of an amount sufficient to enable the Group to ben-
efit from the deductions for the losses to be realised;
the Group continues to comply with the conditions for deductibility imposed by tax legislation; and
no changes in tax legislation adversely affect the Group in realising the benefit from the deductions for the
losses.
50 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
NOTE 6: BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
On 24 May 2013 Cellmid Limited acquired 100% of the ordinary share shares of Advangen Incorporated (Japanese enti-
ty) for the total consideration transferred of JPY ¥285,171,564. This has been translated to AUD $2,893,968 using the
exchange rate per the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) on 24 May 2013.
The following table shows the assets acquired, liabilities assumed and the purchase consideration at the acquisition date.
Book value
Fair value
Exchange rate
Fair value
¥JPY
¥JPY
41,182,636
41,182,636
19,594,272
19,594,272
31,742,886
31,742,886
2,850,035
2,850,035
848,292
848,292
-
198,099,144
(9,145,701)
(9,145,701)
87,072,420
285,171,564
98.54
98.54
98.54
98.54
98.54
98.54
98.54
-
-
-
285,171,564
Assets or liabilities acquired:
Cash
Trade receivables
Inventories
Other assets
Plant and equipment
Intangible assets
Trade payables
Net identifiable assets acquired
Goodwill
Acquisition date fair value of the total
consideration transferred
Representing:
- Cash
- Fair value of issued shares
Cash used to acquire business, net of cash acquired:
Cash to acquire subsidiary
Less: cash and cash equivalents on acquisition
Net cash used
$AU
417,928
198,846
322,132
28,923
8,609
2,010,342
(92,812)
2,893,968
-
2,893,968
1,221,839
1,672,129
2,893,968
1,221,839
417,928
803,911
The contribution to profit or loss and other income of Advangen Incorporated for the year can be found in Note 25.
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 51
notes to the financial statements
Continued
NOTE 7: INTERESTS OF KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL (KMP)
a. Directors and key management personnel
The following persons were directors or key management personnel of Cellmid Limited during the financial year:
David King (Chairman) - appointed from 18 January 2008 to current
Ms Maria Halasz (Chief Executive Officer) - appointed from 19 November 2007 to current
Mr Graeme Kaufman (Non executive) - appointed from 27 August 2012 to current
Mr Martin Rogers (Non executive) - appointed from 19 September 2012 to current
Mr Nicholas Falzon (Secretary and Financial Controller) - appointed from 6 October 2010 to current
b. Directors and key management personnel compensation
Refer to the remuneration Report contained in the Directors’ Report for details of the remuneration paid or payable to each
member of the Group’s key management personnel for the year ended 30 June 2014.
The totals of remuneration paid to KMP of the Company and the Group during the year are as follows:
Short term employment benefits
Post employment benefits
Share-based payments
NOTE 8: AUDITOR’S REMUNERATION
2014
$
582,804
37,197
52,047
672,048
2013
$
536,887
44,915
-
581,802
During the year the following fees were paid or payable for services provided by the auditor of the parent entity, its related
practices and a non-related audit firm:
Auditing or review of the financial statements
- BDO East Coast Partnership -Australia
- BDO Toyo & Co - Japan
52,500
10,479
62,979
54,900
10,200
65,100
52 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
NOTE 9: EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic and diluted earnings per share (in cents)
2014
$
(0.21)
2013
$
(0.27)
a. Reconciliation of earnings to profit or loss from continuing operations
Loss for the year
(1,473,815)
(1,541,307)
b. Weighted average number of shares used as the denominator
Weighted average number of ordinary shares used in calculating dilutive EPS
696,596,038
563,832,659
No.
No.
Options
315,656,738 options granted to executives and directors (2013: 354,105,173) are considered to be potential ordinary
shares and have been included in the determination of diluted earnings per share to the extent to which they are dilutive. In
the year ended 30 June 2014, these options were in fact anti-dilutive, and consequently diluted earnings per share is the
same as basic earnings per share. The options have not been included in the determination of basic earnings per share.
Details relating to options are set out in Note 18.
NOTE 10: CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash at bank and in hand
Short term bank deposits
2,495,778
1,754,994
5,975
-
2,501,753
1,754,994
The effective interest rate on short term bank deposits was 3.5-4.5% ( 2013: 3.5-4.5%); these deposits were all on call.
Reconciliation of cash
Cash and Cash equivalents reported in the consolidated statement of cash flows are reconciled to the equivalent items in
the consolidated statement of financial position as follows:
Cash and cash equivalents
2,501,753
1,754,994
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 53
notes to the financial statements
Continued
NOTE 11: TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES
CURRENT
Trade receivables
Other receivables
Effective interest rates and credit risk
2014
$
177,787
42,684
220,471
2013
$
41,123
214,572
255,695
The Group has no significant concentration of credit risk with respect to any single counterparty or group of counterparties
other than those receivables specifically provided for and mentioned within Note 23(a). The class of assets described as
‘trade and other receivables” is considered to be the main source of credit risk related to the group.
There is no interest rate risk for the balances of trade and other receivables. There is no material credit risk associated with
other receivables. No receivables are past due or impaired.
2014
$
2013
$
1,019,368
643,009
46,988
1,022,708
672,218
-
1,709,365
1,694,926
362,806
(319,537)
43,269
366,065
(314,432)
51,633
NOTE 12: INVENTORIES
CURRENT
Midkine
Finished goods
Raw materials
NOTE 13: PLANT & EQUIPMENT
PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
At cost
Accumulated depreciation
54 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
a. Movements in carrying amounts of plant and equipment
Balance at 1 July 2013
Additions
Depreciation
Balance at 30 June 2014
Balance at 1 July 2012
Additions through business combinations
Additions
Depreciation expense
Balance at 30 June 2013
NOTE 14: INTANGIBLE ASSETS
PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS
At cost
Accumulated amortisation
a. Movements in carrying amounts of intangible assets
Balance at 1 July 2013
Additions
- Amortisation
Foreign exchange movements
Balance at 30 June 2014
Balance at 1 July 2012
Additions
Foreign exchange movements
Balance at 30 June 2013
Plant and
Equipment
$
51,633
3,259
(11,623)
43,269
32,276
8,609
27,382
(16,634)
51,633
Total
$
51,633
3,259
(11,623)
43,269
32,276
8,609
27,382
(16,634)
51,633
2014
$
2013
$
2,011,782
(100,517)
1,911,265
2,163,150
-
2,163,150
Patents &
Trademarks
$
Total
$
2,163,150
2,163,150
-
(100,517)
(151,368)
-
(100,517)
(152,808)
1,911,265
1,909,825
1,440
1,440
2,010,342
2,010,342
151,368
151,368
2,163,150
2,163,150
Intangible assets, other than goodwill, have finite useful lives. The Group has determined the useful life of the intangible
asset at 20 years. There is no amortisation charge to the intangible assets in the 2013 financial year.
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 55
notes to the financial statements
Continued
2014
$
2013
$
68,302
73,321
293,378
1,340
268,465
563,183
271,936
-
229,363
501,299
Employee Benefits
Annual Leave
Long Service
Leave
$
134,755
31,449
166,254
2014
$
166,254
61,262
227,516
$
52,508
8,754
61,262
2013
$
134,755
52,508
187,263
NOTE 15: OTHER ASSETS
CURRENT
Prepayments
NOTE 16: TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES
CURRENT
Trade payables
GST payable
Other payables
NOTE 17: PROVISIONS
Balance at 1 July 2013
Additional provisions
Provision for employee benefits
Analysis of total provisions
Current
Non-current
Provision for employee benefits
56 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
NOTE 18: CONTRIBUTED EQUITY
735,585,702 (2013: 650,470,079) Ordinary shares
315,656,738 (2013: 354,105,173) Options
2014
$
2013
$
26,769,571
24,704,261
632,261
632,261
27,401,832
25,336,522
a. Ordinary shares
At the beginning of the year
Shares issued - July 2012
Shares issued - March 2013
Shares issued - May 2013
Escrowed shares - November 20131
Shares issued - November 20132
Shares issued - December 2013
Shares issued - December 2013
Shares issued - February 2014
Shares issue costs, net of tax
At the end of the year
Issue price
$
2014
No.
2013
No.
2014
No.
2013
No.
650,470,079
520,843,117
24,704,261
20,741,843
0.0165
0.0400
0.0400
0.0300
0.0340
0.0300
0.0150
0.0400
-
-
-
24,242,424
49,646,914
55,737,624
12,000,000
3,515,625
66,666,666
2,333,332
600,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
119,531
2,000,000
35,000
24,000
400,000
1,985,877
1,672,129
-
-
-
-
-
(113,221)
(97,588)
735,585,702
650,470,079
26,769,571
24,704,261
1. 12,000,000 shares were issued to Maria Halasz on 25 November 2013 under a limited recourse loan arrange-
ment. The shares were held in escrow and unpaid at 30 June 2014 (2013: nil). All other shares are fully paid.
2. On 25 November 2013, Cellmid Limited acquired the remaining 5% interest in its subsidiary, Advangen Inter-
national Pty Ltd, from Direct Capital Group Pty Limited (a controlled entity of Maria Halasz) and related party of
Cellmid Limited. Consideration of 3,515,625 shares in Cellmid Limited, with a market value of $119,531 was
provided for the acquisition. The carrying value of the non-controlling interest as at the date of acquisition was
a net liability position $35,265. Therefore the transaction resulted in an adjustment to the acquisition reserve of
$154,796. Refer to Note 22: Related Party Transactions.
The holders of ordinary shares are entitled to participate in dividends and the proceeds on winding up of the Company. On
a show of hands at meetings of the Company, each holder of ordinary shares has one vote in person or by proxy, and upon
a poll each share is entitled to one vote.
The Company does not have authorised capital or par value in respect of its shares.
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 57
notes to the financial statements
Continued
b. Options
(i) For information relating to the Cellmid Limited and controlled entities employee option plan, including details of
options issued, exercised and lapsed during the financial year and the options outstanding at year end, refer to
Note 28 Share based payments.
(ii) For information relating to share options issued to key management personnel during the financial year, refer to
the remuneration report.
At the beginning of the year
Options issued - August 2013
Options issued - October 2013
Options issued - November 2013
Options issued - December 2013
Options issued - March 2014
Options issued - April 2014
Options lapsed - April 2014
Options lapsed - July 2013
Options lapsed - March 2014
Options lapsed - April 2014
At the end of the year
(c) Capital Risk Management
2014
No.
2013
No.
354,105,173
36,923,968
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(3,000,000)
(27,198,435)
(8,250,000)
1,440,000
262,542,770
3,000,000
25,000,000
26,573,435
625,000
(2,000,000)
-
-
-
315,656,738
354,105,173
The Group’s objectives when managing capital are to safeguard its ability to continue as a going concern, so that it can
provide returns for shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders and to maintain an optimum capital structure to reduce
the cost of capital.
In order to maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Group may adjust the amount of dividends paid to shareholders,
return capital to shareholders, issue new shares or sell assets to reduce debt.
The Group look to raise capital when an opportunity to invest in a business or company is seen as value adding relative to
the current parent entity’s share price at the time of the investment. The Group is not actively pursuing additional invest-
ments in the short term as it continues to integrate and grow its existing businesses in order to maximise synergies.
58 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
NOTE 19: RESERVES
Share based payment reserve
Balance the beginning of the year
Share based payment expense
2014
$
2013
$
1,727,263
1,723,230
74,524
4,033
Balance at the end of the year
1,801,787
1,727,263
Acquisition reserve
Balance the beginning of the year
Acquisition of non-controlling interests in Advangen International Pty Ltd
Balance at the end of the year
General reserve
Balance the beginning of the year
Net movement as a result of shares issued to minority interest
Balance at the end of the year
Foreign exchange reserve
Balance the beginning of the year
Foreign exchange movements
Balance at the end of the year
Total reserves
a. Foreign currency translation reserve
-
(154,796)
(154,796)
22,855
-
22,855
216,257
(180,898)
35,359
-
-
-
22,855
-
22,855
-
216,257
216,257
1,705,205
1,966,375
Exchange differences arising on translation of the foreign controlled entity are recognised in other comprehensive income
foreign currency translation reserve. The cumulative amount is reclassified to profit or loss when the net investment is
disposed.
b. General reserve
The general reserve records funds set aside for future expansion of the Group.
c. Share based payments reserve
This reserve records the cumulative value of employee services received for the issue of share options. When the option is
exercised the amount in the share option reserve is transferred to share capital.
d. Acquisition reserve
On 25 November 2013, Cellmid Limited acquired the remaining 5% interest in its subsidiary, Advangen International Pty
Ltd, from Direct Capital Group Pty Limited (a controlled entity of Maria Halasz) and related party of Cellmid Limited. Con-
sideration of 3,515,625 shares in Cellmid Limited, with a market value of $119,531 was provided for the acquisition. The
carrying value of the non-controlling interest as at the date of acquisition was a net liability position $35,265. Therefore the
transaction resulted in an adjustment to the acquisition reserve of $154,796. Refer to Note 22: Related Party Transactions.
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 59
notes to the financial statements
Continued
NOTE 20: CASH FLOW INFORMATION
a. Reconciliation of Cash Flow from Operations with Loss after Income Tax
Loss for the year
Non cash flows in loss:
- depreciation and amortisation
- licence revenue
- share base payment
- bad and doubtful debt
- gain on sale of financial asset
- foreign exchange loss
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of the effects of purchase of subsidiaries:
- (increase)/decrease in trade and other receivables
- (increase)/decrease in prepayments
- (increase)/decrease in inventories
- increase/(decrease) in trade and other payables
- increase/(decrease) in provisions
Cash flow from operations
2014
$
2013
$
(1,480,836)
(1,541,307)
112,140
(570,741)
133,523
-
(429,519)
(132,313)
35,224
5,019
(14,439)
61,884
40,253
16,634
-
4,033
1,227
(48,875)
-
22,890
(11,583)
(59,303)
146,453
17,063
(2,239,805)
(1,452,768)
NOTE 21: EVENTS AFTER THE REPORTING PERIOD
No matters or circumstances have arisen since the end of the financial year which significantly affected or could significantly
affect the operations of the Group, the results of those operations, or the state of affairs of the Group in future financial years.
NOTE 22: RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
a. The Group’s main related parties are as follows:
Parent entities:
Cellmid Limited is the ultimate parent entity.
Subsidiaries:
For details of disclosures relating to subsidiaries, refer to Note 24: Interests in Subsidiaries. Transactions and balances
between subsidiaries and the parent have been eliminated on consolidation of the group.
Key management Personnel:
For details of disclosures relating to key management personnel, refer to Note 7: Interests of Key Management Personnel
(KMP) and the remuneration report within the Directors’, report.
b. Transactions with related parties
On the 25 November 2013, Cellmid Limited acquired the remaining 5% interest in its subsidiary, Advangen International Pty
Ltd, from Direct Capital Group Pty Limited a controlled entity of Maria Halasz, a Director of the company. Consideration of
3,515,625 Cellmid Limited shares, with a market value of $119,531 was provided for the acquisition.
There were no other related party transactions during the year ended 30 June 2014.
60 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
NOTE 23: FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT
The Group’s activities expose it to a number of financial risks as described below. The Group’s overall risk management
program seeks to minimise potential adverse effects on the financial performance of the Group. To date, the group has not
had the need to utilise derivative financial instruments such as foreign exchange contracts or interest rate swaps to manage
any risk exposures identified.
The totals for each category of financial instruments, measured in accordance with AASB 139 as detailed in the accounting
policies to these financial statements, are as follows:
Financial Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other receivables
Total financial assets
Financial Liabilities
Financial liabilities at amortised cost
Trade and other payables
Note
10
11
2014
$
2013
$
2,501,753
220,471
1,754,994
255,695
2,722,224
2,010,689
16
563,183
501,299
Total financial liabilities
563,183
501,299
The fair value of financial assets and liabilities equate to the carrying value.
a. Credit risk
Credit risk is managed on a Group basis. The group has no significant concentration of credit risk.
The maximum exposure to credit risk by class of recognised financial assets at the end of the reporting period is equivalent
to the carrying value and classification of those financial assets (net of any provisions) as presented in the table above.
Trade and other receivables that are neither past due nor impaired are considered to be of high credit quality.
Credit risk related to balances with banks and other financial institutions is managed by management in accordance with
approved board policy. Such policy requires that surplus funds are only invested with counterparties with a Standard &
Poor’s rating of at least AA .
b. Liquidity risk
The Group manages this risk through the following mechanisms:
— preparing forward looking cash flow analysis in relation to its operational, investing and financing activities;
— managing credit risk related to financial assets; and
— only investing surplus cash with major financial institutions.
The Group is not exposed to any material liquidity risk.
Financial liabilities consist only of trade and other payables for which the contractual maturity dates are within 6 months of
the reporting date.
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 61
notes to the financial statements
Continued
c. Market risk
Foreign exchange risk
Exposure to foreign exchange risk may result in the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument fluctuating due
to movement in foreign exchange rates of currencies in which the Group holds financial instruments which are other than
the AUD functional currency of the Group.
The maximum exposure to foreign exchange risk is the fluctuation in the US dollar on its USD and JPY denominated bank
accounts and also the profit and net assets of the Japanese subsidiary, Advangen Incorporated.
The Company has performed a sensitivity analysis relating to its exposure to foreign currency risk at the end of the finan-
cial year. The sensitivity analysis demonstrates the effect on the current year results and equity which could result from
a change in this risk. At the end of the financial year, the effect on profit and equity as a result of changes in the foreign
exchange rate with all other variables remaining constant would be as follows:
Year ended 30 June 2014
+/- 1% in foreign exchange rates
Year ended 30 June 2013
+/- 1% in foreign exchange rates
Interest rate risk
Profit
$
Equity
$
+/- 2,707
-/+ 938
+/- 739
+/- 9,110
The Group’s main interest rate risk arises from deposits with banks and other financial institutions. Deposits made at vari-
able rates expose the Group to interest rate risk. Management maintains approximately 100% of deposits with banks at
call on variable interest rates.
The Company has performed a sensitivity analysis relating to its exposure to interest rate risk at the end of the financial year.
The sensitivity analysis demonstrates the effect on the current year results and equity which could result from a change
in this risk. At the end of the financial year, the effect on profit and equity as a result of changes in the interest rate with all
other variables remaining constant would be as follows:
Year ended 30 June 2014
+/- 1% in interest rates
Year ended 30 June 2013
+/- 1% in interest rates
Price risk
The Group is not exposed to any material price risk.
Profit
$
Equity
$
+/- 25,018
+/- 25,018
+/- 17,550
+/- 17,550
62 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
NOTE 24: INTERESTS IN SUBSIDIARIES
The consolidated financial statements incorporate the assets, liabilities and results of the following wholly-owned subsidiar-
ies in accordance with the accounting policy described in Note 1:
Name
Subsidiaries of Cellmid Limited:
Advangen International Pty Limited1
Advangen Limited
Advangen Incorporated
Country of
Incorporation
Australia
Australia
Japan
Percentage
Owned (%)
2014
Percentage
Owned (%)
2013
100
100
100
95
100
100
1. On 25 November 2013, Cellmid Limited acquired the remaining 5% interest in its subsidiary, Advangen Inter-
national Pty Ltd, from Direct Capital Group Pty Limited (a controlled entity of Maria Halasz) and related party of
Cellmid Limited. Refer to Note 22: Related Party Transactions.
NOTE 25: SEGMENT INFORMATION
Identification of reporting segments
The Group is organised into two operating segments: (1) research and development of diagnostics and therapeutics and
(2) research, development and marketing of hair growth products. These operating segments are based on the internal
reports that are reviewed and used by the Board of Directors (identified as the Chief Operating Decision Makers (CODM))
in assessing performance and in determining the allocation of resources. There is no aggregation of operating segments.
The CODM reviews both adjusted earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (segment result) and profit
before income tax.
Types of products and services
The principal products and services of each of these operating segments are as follows:
Research of Diagnostics and Therapeutics (Biotechnology)
- research and development, marketing and promotional activities;
- diagnostics and therapeutics for cancer and inflammatory conditions; and
Research, development and marketing of hair growth products (Retailing)
- hair growth products.
Geographical segment information
The primary geographic segment within which the Group operates is Australia as at 30 June 2014. For primary reporting
purposes, the Group operates in two geographic segment as described as at 30 June 2014.
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 63
notes to the financial statements
Continued
Major customers
During the year ended 30 June 2014 approximately 49% of the Group’s external revenue was derived from sales to Frost-
bland Pty Ltd (4%) through the retailing segment, and Pacific Edge Biotechnology Limited (25%) and Fujikura Kasei Co
Limited (20%) through the biotechnology segments.
Biotechnology
Australia
Retailing Australia
Retailing Japan
Total
2014
$
2013
$
2014
$
2013
$
2014
$
2013
$
2014
$
2013
$
64,300
64,300
52,014
1,009,188
26,220
19,900
215,279
271,257
311,098
815,374
15,272
1,150,931
541,649
215,279
271,257
311,098
815,374
15,272
1,150,931
541,649
30,833
358
24,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
40
-
-
-
10,988
398
5,596
-
-
-
8
52,054
30,833
1,009,188
26,220
36,494
358
24,000
406
1,171,622
270,470
282,255
311,496
821,010
15,280
2,274,887
712,413
Revenue
Sales of products
Total sales revenue
Interest received
Royalties
Rental revenue
Other revenue
Total Revenue
Other income
Government grant received
91,542
115,167
Gain on disposal of financial assets
429,519
48,875
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
91,542
115,167
429,519
48,875
Expenses
(2,917,117)
(2,374,994)
(606,005)
(576,661)
(1,252,594)
(115,015)
(4,775,716)
(3,066,670)
Share - based compensation
(133,523)
(4,032)
Depreciation and amortisation
Finance costs
(7,562)
(2,501)
(13,919)
(1,110)
-
(271)
(10)
-
-
-
(133,523)
(4,032)
(156)
(104,307)
(2,560)
(112,140)
(16,635)
(14)
-
-
(2,511)
(1,124)
Loss before income tax
(1,368,020)
(1,959,543)
(324,031)
(265,335)
(535,891)
(102,296)
(2,227,942)
(2,327,173)
Income tax benefit
Loss after income tax benefit
Assets
Segment assets
Total assets
Liabilities
Segment liabilities
Total liabilities
747,106
785,866
(1,480,836)
(1,541,307)
3,621,544
2,545,805
368,379
369,363
2,464,502
3,078,551
6,454,425
5,993,719
6,454,425
5,993,719
(640,317)
(532,592)
(87,287)
(79,483)
(63,095)
(76,487)
(790,699)
(688,562)
(790,699)
(688,562)
NOTE 26: COMMITMENTS
Lease commitments - operating
Committed at the reporting date but not recognised as liabilities, payable:
Within one year
One to five years
Minimum lease payments
2014
$
157,069
490,655
647,724
2013
$
174,039
554,061
728,100
Operating lease commitments includes contracted amounts for office space under non-cancellable operating lease expir-
ing within five years with no option to extend.
64 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
NOTE 27: CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND CONTINGENT ASSETS
The Company and Group had no contingent liabilities or contingent assets at 30 June 2014 (nil at 30 June 2013).
NOTE 28: SHARE BASED PAYMENTS
At 30 June 2014 the Group has the following share based payment schemes:
(i) The Cellmid Limited and Controlled Entities Employee Incentive Plan is designed as an incentive for eligible
employees of the Group. Under the plan, participants are granted options which only vest if certain conditions
are met.
A summary of the Company options granted under the plan is as follows:
Expiry Date
23/10/2016
3/07/2013
19/03/2014
1/06/2014
1/07/2014
20/11/2014
20/11/2014
19/02/2015
15/11/2015
15/11/2016
15/06/2017
14/08/2017
Exercise
price
Balance at start
of the year
Granted
Exercised
0.034
0.057
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.056
0.035
0.062
0.100
0.030
0.032
0.034
290,542,770
3,000,000
27,198,435
8,250,000
5,002,006
7,000,000
2,000,000
600,000
100,000
3,971,962
5,000,000
1,440,000
354,105,173
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Forfeited/
expired
Balance at the
end of the year
-
290,542,770
(3,000,000)
(27,198,435)
(8,250,000)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5,002,006
7,000,000
2,000,000
600,000
100,000
3,971,962
5,000,000
1,440,000
(38,448,435)
315,656,738
The weighted average share price during the financial year was $0.030 ($0.022 in 2013). The weighted average remaining
contractual life of the options outstanding at the end of the financial year was 2.24 years (1.96 years in 2013).
For options granted in the current year financial year, the valuation model inputs used to determine the fair value at the
grant date were as follows:
Grant Date
Expiry Date
Share price
at grant date
Exercise
price
Expected
volatility
Dividend
yield
Risk-free
interest rate
Fair value at
grant date
25/11/2013
25/11/2016
0.030
0.030
95.58%
0%
3.08%
0.0183
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 65
notes to the financial statements
Continued
NOTE 29: COMPANY DETAILS
The registered office of the Company is:
Suite 1802, Level 18
15 Castlereagh Street
Sydney NSW 2000
Australia
The principal places of business are:
Cellmid Limited
Suite 1802, Level 18
15 Castlereagh Street
Sydney NSW 2000
Australia
Advangen International Pty Limited
Suite 1802, Level 18
15 Castlereagh Street
Sydney NSW 2000
Australia
Advangen Incorporated
Chiba Industry Advancement Centre
Tokatsu Techno Plaza
5 4 6 Kashiwanoha
Kashiwa
Chiba 277-0082 Japan
66 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 67
68 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
Directors’
Declaration
DIRECTORS’ DECLARATION
In the directors’ opinion:
•
•
•
•
the attached financial statements and notes thereto comply with the Corporations Act 2001, the Accounting Standards,
the Corporations Regulations 2001 and other mandatory professional reporting requirements;
the attached financial statements and notes thereto comply with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued
by the International Accounting Standards Board as described in note 1 to the financial statements;
the attached financial statements and notes thereto give a true and fair view of the Group’s financial position as at 30
June 2014 and of its performance for the financial year ended on that date;
there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due
and payable; and
• at the date of this declaration, there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company and the Group will be able to
pay its debts as and when they become due and payable.
The directors have been given the declarations required by section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001.
Signed in accordance with a resolution of the Board of Directors made pursuant to Section 295 (5) of the Corporations
Act 2001.
Dr David King
Director
Dated this 29th day of August 2014
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 69
70 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
Cellmid 2014 Annual Report 71
72 Cellmid 2014 Annual Report
Additional
information
The information in this section has been prepared as at 31 August 2014.
20 LARGEST SHAREHOLDERS
Holder Name
CELL SIGNALS INC
SEISTEND (SUPER) PTY LTD
Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above