Annual Report
December 31, 2012
2012
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights
Letter to Shareholders
Ten-Year Historical Financial Highlights
Subsidiary Profi les
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Consolidated Financial Statements
Management’s Report to Shareholders
Independent Auditors’ Report
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Corporate Directory
Corporate Information
2
4
16
18
20
46
47
48
53
88
89
Front cover image: Percé Rock, Gaspé, Québec
CI Financial Corp. is a diversifi ed wealth management fi rm and Canada’s third-largest investment fund company. Independent
and Canadian-owned, CI provides a comprehensive selection of top-quality investment products and services. CI has two
million clients and manages or administers approximately $105 billion in assets (as at March 31, 2013). CI operates primarily
through subsidiaries CI Investments Inc. and Assante Wealth Management (Canada) Ltd.
CI Investments offers the industry’s broadest selection of investment funds under the CI, Black Creek, Cambridge, Harbour,
Red Sky, Signature, Synergy, Portfolio Series, Portfolio Select Series and SunWise Essential Series 2 banners.
Assante Wealth Management provides fi nancial advisory services through a national network of 750 professional fi nancial
advisors. Stonegate Private Counsel, a division of CI Private Counsel LP, provides wealth planning services to high net worth
individuals and families.
CI’s other businesses include Perimeter Markets Inc., which operates alternative marketplaces for trading Canadian fi xed-
income products under the CBID brand. CI also owns interests in Altrinsic Global Advisors, LLC, a global investment manager
based in Greenwich, Connecticut, and in Toronto-based alternative asset managers Red Sky Capital Management Ltd. and
Lawrence Park Capital Partners Ltd.
1
Financial Highlights
( in millions of dollars, except share amounts)
As at December 31, 2012
As at December 31, 2011
% change
Assets under management
Total assets
Shares outstanding
75,723
98,922
69,558
91,102
282,914,642
283,567,039
9
9
0
( in millions of dollars, except share amounts)
As at December 31, 2012
As at December 31, 2011
% change
For the year ended
For the year ended
Average assets under management
Management fees
Total revenues
SG&A
Trailer fees
Net income
Earnings per share
EBITDA*
EBITDA* per share
Dividends recorded per share
Average shares outstanding
72,606
1,277.7
1,457.8
286.0
374.0
352.2
1.24
703.6
2.48
0.96
72,186
1,302.8
1,496.3
290.8
379.5
376.9
1.31
726.2
2.53
0.89
283,389,571
286,997,604
1
(2)
(3)
(2)
(1)
(7)
(5)
(3)
(2)
8
(1)
* EBITDA (Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) is not a standardized earnings measure prescribed by IFRS;
however, management believes that most of its shareholders, creditors, other stakeholders and investment analysts prefer to include
the use of this performance measure in analyzing CI’s results. CI’s method of calculating this measure may not be comparable to
similar measures presented by other companies.
CIX VS S&P/TSX COMPOSITE INDEX TOTAL RETURN (IPO IN JUNE 1994 = 100)
3,500
3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
2,711
2,760
2,425
2,445
2,595
2,535
S&P/TSX Composite Index
CIX
3,125
942
195
’03
1,339
1,468
244
284
’04
’05
May 31
1,562
354
395
434
291
392
461
421
451
’06
’06†
’07
’08
’09
Dec. 31
’10
’11
’12
† Dec. 2006, seven month period.
2
ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT ($ BILLIONS)
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
56.9
49.1
44.2
28.8
62.7
67.2
64.2
52.8
72.8
69.6
75.7
’03
’04
’05
May 31
’06
’06†
’07
’08
’09
Dec. 31
’10
’11
’12
† Dec. 2006, seven month period.
CIX SHARE PRICE ($)
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
31.03
26.72
28.07
22.00
22.50
21.10
24.93
16.44
17.30
11.90
14.50
’03
’04
’05
May 31
’06
’06†
’07
’08
’09
Dec. 31
’10
’11
’12
† Dec. 2006, seven month period.
DIVIDENDS PER SHARE ($)
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0
2.25
1.74
1.155
0.675
0.70
0.77
0.63
0.89
0.955
0.29
’03
0.405
’04
’05
May 31
’06
’06†
’07
’08
’09
Dec. 31
’10
’11
’12
† Dec. 2006, seven month period.
3
Letter to Shareholders
DEAR SHAREHOLDERS,
Your company had an excellent year in 2012. In the face of continued volatility in fi nancial markets and lingering doubts
about the strength of the global economy, CI Financial delivered strong results. Most notably, our assets under management
grew 9% year over year to reach a new record, our net sales increased 200%, and our cash fl ow supported an increase in
the dividend and a continued strengthening of our fi nancial position.
Although 2012 marked the fourth year of recovery following the global fi nancial crisis, investor confi dence was still
sensitive to the latest news. Equity markets fell sharply in the second quarter and were choppy over the following months
in response to concerns over the ongoing European debt issues, the pace of growth in the U.S. and China, as well as the
U.S. presidential election and the “fi scal cliff.”
In the fourth quarter, however, share prices staged a decisive rally that continued into the fi rst quarter of 2013. For the year,
the S&P/TSX Composite Index gained 7.2%, while the S&P 500 Index rose 13.5% and the MSCI World Index was up 14.1%
(all in Canadian dollars). It’s worthwhile noting that the Canadian index underperformed U.S. stocks for the second year
in a row and remains below both its 2011 high and its all-time high reached in 2008. Meanwhile, in the U.S., the Dow Jones
Industrial Average and the S&P 500 Index powered to new closing highs in March 2013. These moves signalled a meaningful
shift in sentiment, as investors seemed to accept that the recovery is genuine and Europe has its debt problems more or
less under control.
At CI, we stuck to our game plan, investing in our portfolio management teams, product lineup, technology, the training
and development of staff, and sales and marketing. You can see our long-term strategy outlined in the next section. The
result of these efforts has been that CI has continued to grow and build on its success, while many competitors have
retrenched and shrunk. And with the recent turn in the markets, CI was well positioned to reap the rewards. In the fi rst
quarter of 2013, CI posted its highest level of fi rst quarter net sales in seven years.
4
CI’S LONG-TERM STRATEGY
Product quality and diversity. By providing a broad selection of high-quality products and services to Canadian
investors, we reduce our dependence on any single market sector, product or portfolio manager and ensure we are
well positioned to respond to the changing needs of investors. More importantly, it enhances our relationships with
advisors by allowing them to meet their clients’ needs through a single supplier.
Talented and experienced investment managers. CI has signifi cant assets under management, and we use this size
and scale to attract and retain the best investment managers in the industry. We select portfolio managers based on
a reputation for skilled investment management and their long-term track records.
Operational and performance excellence. This includes the prudent and effi cient management of our funds and our
company, the development of high-quality products and a well-known brand.
Superior service. By exceeding the service expectations of our investors and our multiple distribution networks, we aim
to solidify these relationships and maintain a reputation for sound management.
Skill and knowledge. CI’s managers and employees possess the specialized knowledge and experience to anticipate
client needs, develop appropriate products and market those products effectively. CI provides training programs to
ensure that the expertise of its employees and advisors remains at a high level.
FINANCIAL RESULTS
Robust asset growth
Assets under management were $75.7 billion at December 31, 2012, a robust increase of 9% from $69.6 billion a year earlier.
This was a month-end record for CI and compares to the increase of 7.2% for the S&P/TSX Composite Index. Total assets,
which include assets under administration, were $98.9 billion at year-end, which is also a gain of 9%. With the strong
performance of our funds early this year, assets under management grew another 6% to $80.5 billion at March 31, 2013, and
total assets reached $104.7 billion.
5
Average assets under management also reached a record level of $72.6 billion in 2012, though the year-over-year gain was
1%. This refl ects the pattern of market volatility throughout 2012, as the growth in our assets was not achieved in a steady,
upwards progression.
Refl ecting the change in average assets, revenues for the year were fl at, at $1.5 billion. Net income was $352.2 million in
2012, down 7% from $376.9 million in the prior year. Earnings per share were down 5% to $1.24 from $1.31 in 2011. However,
there were two items that affected this comparison: CI received an insurance settlement of $3.5 million in 2011, and there
was an $18 million non-cash tax adjustment in 2012, resulting from an increase in future corporate income taxes imposed by
the Ontario government. Adjusting for those two items means that the decline in net income was less than 1%. In looking
at pre-tax operating earnings per share, which is designed to show CI’s underlying profi tability before taxes and other
items, we see that this measure was $2.26 in 2012 and $2.28 in 2011 – again, a change of less than 1%.
One of the themes in our industry in recent years has been the dominance of income funds in the sales charts as investors
have continued to shun equity funds since the severe bear market of 2008-09. Statistics provided by research fi rm Investor
Economics Inc. indicate that net sales of funds classifi ed as fi xed-income and income balanced accounted for 137% of
industry net sales in 2012 (excluding money market funds).
CI is well represented in the income segment with a number of funds with good performance and sales. However, income
funds have lower management fees than balanced or equity funds. Our institutional products, which are becoming an
increasingly important part of our business, also have lower management fees than most retail funds. What this means for
our results is that funds with lower fees are becoming a larger part of our overall asset mix.
A high level of effi ciency
CI has been able to offset this trend and maintain its profi tability through the strict control of expenses. Selling, general
and administrative expenses expressed as percentage of average assets under management declined 3% to 39 basis points
in 2012 from 40 basis points in 2011. We are proud of this achievement by our staff, especially given that it occurred while
assets under management grew by 9% and we increased our expenditure in key areas of our operations, including portfolio
management and sales and marketing.
Free cash fl ow amounted to $423.9 million in 2012 and it was used to strengthen the fi nancial position of the company
by paying down debt and to return cash to you, our shareholders, through share repurchases and dividends.
6
During the year, CI’s debt, net of cash and marketable securities not needed for regulatory capital, was reduced by $204.2
million to $526.5 million, which included the repayment of $250 million in debentures that matured in December 2012,
partially offset by an increase in our credit facility. This level of debt is quite manageable for CI, leaving us with the capacity
to fi nance acquisitions or other strategic opportunities. It represents a ratio of net debt to EBITDA (earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization) of 0.7:1 – a decrease from 1.1:1 a year earlier.
Creating wealth for shareholders
In 2012, we repurchased 1.4 million shares at a cost of $30.5 million, and paid dividends of $269.2 million. The dividend
rate was raised to $0.08 per month per share from $0.075 during the year, with a further increase to $0.085 effective
March 2013.
CI has been consistent in boosting its dividend as our business has grown. Our annual dividend payment has increased
from $0.57 per share in 2009, when CI converted back to a corporation from an income trust, to its current rate of $1.02
per share – an increase of 79%. At the same time, we have been prudent in ensuring that the dividend is supported by our
cash fl ow. As a percentage of free cash fl ow, our dividend payout ratio in 2012 was 63%, compared to 59% in the prior year.
This is driven by our long-term commitment to return cash not required to fi nance the company’s operations and growth
to our shareholders, and we believe that our record in this is matched by few companies. Since our $25 million initial public
offering in 1994, CI has returned $4.2 billion to shareholders, consisting of $3.0 billion in dividends and distributions and $1.2
billion in share repurchases (as of February 28, 2013).
In 2012, CI’s share price responded to the improving fi nancial markets and our asset growth, appreciating to $24.93 from
$21.10 over the 12-month period. The return including dividends during the year was 23.3%. With rising markets in early
2013, CI’s share price appreciated a further 13.7% to $28.10, and our market capitalization reached $8.0 billion as of March 31.
We are especially proud of CI’s long-term return. From the June 1994 IPO to the end of March 2013, CI has returned 3,454%,
versus 366% for the S&P/TSX Composite Index and 1,135% for the fi nancial services sub-index. This equates to a compound
annual growth rate of 20.9%, making CI one of the Top 5 performing stocks on the index over that period.
7
OPERATING RESULTS
Net sales increase 200%
CI had impressive sales in 2012, reaching $10.6 billion in gross sales – the fi rst time we exceeded $10 billion since 2008 – and
$973 million in net sales. This represents increases of 16.1% and 201%, respectively, over the year before. Industry net sales
as reported by the Investment Funds Institute of Canada rose 43% to $30.4 billion.
Approximately three-quarters of our net sales for the year were posted in the fourth quarter, accompanying the
improvement in investor confi dence and the turnaround in the markets. As we said at the start of this letter, CI is well
positioned to benefi t from the change in sentiment given the performance of our portfolio managers and the quality and
breadth of our product lineup.
The sources of our sales were quite diversifi ed, with both the institutional and retail divisions contributing. On the retail
side, our key distribution partners all contributed to our tally of net sales. (See below for a more detailed discussion of our
distribution strategy.)
When we look at our sales by product, there are a few observations we would like to share. By asset class, income-related
funds continued to dominate our sales. There are signs of a growing interest in equity funds, though this comes after stocks
have already experienced a four-year bull market. (The S&P 500 Index, for example, gained 133% from its March 2009 low
to the end of March 2013.) By product platform, segregated funds, which combine mutual funds with insurance-based
guarantees, continue to provide good gross sales but remain in net redemptions. Though these funds provide unique
benefi ts, their appeal has been diminished as insurance companies have been forced to reduce benefi ts and increase prices
to refl ect the increased costs of providing the guarantees. In addition, many policies within our older segregated fund
families continue to mature.
Meanwhile, our managed solutions are attracting strong fl ows. These include CI Private Investment Management, a program
aimed at higher net worth investors, and our portfolio solutions, which include Portfolio Select Series, the award-winning
Portfolio Series and, in the Assante channel, Evolution Private Managed Accounts. The shift to portfolio solutions, also
known as wrap or fund-of-funds products, has been a notable industry phenomenon. According to Investor Economics,
fund wraps have experienced a compound annual growth rate in assets of 9.0% since 2007, versus 1.1% for stand-alone
mutual funds. As we often say, a portfolio program is only as good as its underlying funds and so CI’s products in this
category stand out for the quality of performance and portfolio management. CI Investment Consulting, which oversees
our managed solutions, also adds signifi cant value through asset allocation, risk management and currency management.
The sales momentum of the fourth quarter has accelerated in 2013, with CI posting excellent sales and the best fi rst
quarter for net sales in seven years.
8
Outstanding performance
As we noted earlier, the solid performance of our funds is a crucial factor in our sales and CI has provided consistent,
above-average returns. At December 31, 2012, 60% of our long-term assets under management were fi rst or second quartile
over one year and 81% were in the top two quartiles over 10 years. This strength is seen across our portfolio management
lineup, from teams such as Signature Global Advisors, Cambridge Advisors, Harbour Advisors and Black Creek Investment
Management. Notable highlights in 2012 include Cambridge Canadian Growth Companies Fund and Cambridge Pure
Canadian Equity Fund, which were up 40.5% and 34.3%, respectively, and Black Creek International Equity Fund, which
gained 30.5% (all Class A versions).
CI’s performance continues to be recognized by industry awards. CI was the recipient of two 2012 Morningstar Canadian
Investment Awards, with Portfolio Series winning Best Fund of Funds for the second consecutive year and Signature High
Income Fund winning its fourth trophy. CI and its portfolio managers have taken home 33 Morningstar Canadian Investment
Awards over the past 10 years. CI funds also earned eight Lipper Fund Awards in 2012 and another seven in 2013. CI has
received 46 Lipper Fund Awards, which recognize funds that have excelled in delivering consistently strong risk-adjusted
performance relative to peers, since the start of the program in Canada in 2007.
In addition, CI Investments was one of the three top fi rms in the 2012 Brendan Wood International Canadian investment
rankings, with seven of our professionals being named “TopGun Investment Minds.” TopGun status recognizes investment
professionals “who on a competitive basis ranked highest for investment wisdom and professionalism.”
Exceptional portfolio management
In conjunction with providing a wide selection of product platforms and fund mandates, CI follows a strategy of providing
a broad choice of portfolio management teams offering a variety of investment approaches and specialties. CI has
relationships with 18 portfolio management teams, of which three are in-house – Signature, Cambridge and Harbour – and
the remainder are sub-advisors. CI holds minority interests in three – Altrinsic Global Advisors of Greenwich, Connecticut,
and Toronto-based alternative asset managers Red Sky Capital Management, which focuses on North American equities,
and Lawrence Park Capital Partners, which boasts a unique approach to fi xed-income investing. CI Investment Consulting,
an in-house group of analysts, monitors the portfolio management teams, and oversees our managed solutions.
Over the long-term, our three in-house teams have performed well and their share of our overall assets under management
has increased. Today, their share stands at about 75% of total. We continue to invest in building the expertise of our in-
house teams, and the example of Cambridge Advisors illustrates the success of our approach. Cambridge was founded
in January 2008 under the direction of veteran portfolio manager Alan Radlo and has offi ces in Boston and Toronto.
Mr. Radlo was joined by senior Portfolio Managers Robert Swanson and Brandon Snow in 2011. In just fi ve years, the team
has established an excellent track record of performance and attracted over $6 billion in assets. The potential for growth
in the Cambridge family remains outstanding, in both the retail and institutional channels.
9
Our stakes in Red Sky and Lawrence Park were purchased in 2010 and March 2012, respectively, as part of our efforts
to diversify our sources of growth. CI provides administrative services for each fi rm’s hedge fund and our backing has
assisted them in raising assets. We have continued to develop our relationships with them by retaining each fi rm to manage
a portion of the portfolio of an existing CI fund. In addition, we launched Red Sky Canadian Equity Corporate Class to
provide exclusive exposure to the Red Sky team. We expect to launch a dedicated Lawrence Park income fund later
this year.
CI’s portfolio management strategy not only allows for diversity and fosters performance, but also offers a deep roster of
talent to launch new products and provide continuity of management. For example, in 2012, our sub-advisory relationship
with Barometer Capital ended, and the portfolios they managed were switched to Cambridge Advisors in a seamless
transfer of responsibilities.
Quality and choice
CI continually reviews its product lineup to ensure it remains relevant to the marketplace and meets the needs of
Canadian investors. In 2012, our new retail products included:
Cambridge Income Fund, the fi rst income fund managed by the Cambridge team. It has attracted over $580 million in
assets in just over a year.
Signature High Yield Bond Fund, which offers dedicated exposure to this asset class.
Signature Global Dividend Fund, which provides conservative exposure to high-quality dividend-paying global companies
and which we believe is especially timely today, as investors become more open to increasing their investments in
equities.
Red Sky Canadian Equity Corporate Class, a North American equity fund.
SunWise Essential Series 2, a segregated fund program offered in partnership with Sun Life Financial. This program,
launched to replace SunWise Essential Series, which was closed to new investors, maintains CI and Sun Life’s presence
in this market.
We also made a signifi cant change to our fund lineup by merging the Castlerock-branded funds into the CI lineup. When
we purchased Hartford Investments Canada Corp. in December 2010, we were able to integrate its corporate operations
immediately, but were not in a position to integrate the funds, which were being administered by a third-party service
provider. We created the Castlerock brand and operated the funds as a separate division of CI.
In mid-2012, we moved the funds to the CI administrative platform, which allowed us to reduce duplication in our lineup
by merging 18 Castlerock and CI funds into other CI funds, and to replace the variable operating expenses of the former
Castlerock funds with a lower fi xed administration fee – benefi ting the investors in those funds. The funds were also
renamed and we are no longer using the Castlerock brand.
10
This was the fi nal step in integrating this very successful acquisition, which though small relative to CI’s assets, was benefi cial
in growing our assets and developing and strengthening valuable relationships in portfolio management and distribution.
Building strong partnerships
CI has been successful over the past 10 to 15 years in developing multiple channels of distribution for its funds and its
investment management expertise. This strategy has been an important driver of CI’s growth and differentiates us from
other independent fund companies.
Today, our distribution strategy has three central pillars: building the Assante dealership into the premier wealth planning
organization in Canada; growing our retail investment fund business through an intense focus on selected distribution
partners; and expanding our presence in the institutional market through CI Institutional Asset Management.
Assante
Assante continued to grow through 2012, building upon its status as one of Canada’s pre-eminent fi nancial advisory fi rms.
Assets at Assante and Stonegate Private Counsel increased 8.0% over the year to $24.3 billion, refl ecting the improving
performance of fi nancial markets and increasing levels of investment from our clients. Assante’s advisors maintain a focus
on the conservative management of the fi nancial affairs of Canadian families. Assante continues to attract new clients
and additional assets from existing clients as Canadians continue to seek out holistic fi nancial advice. Assante clients were
well served through the volatile environment of the past few years by our emphasis on investing discipline and patience.
Our advisors provide diversifi ed portfolio solutions, backed by the expertise of leading money managers, including the
portfolio management teams of CI Investments. Strong fi nancial markets and increasing sales through the fi rst three
months of this year increased assets to $25.3 billion as at March 31, 2013.
Assante sets itself apart from its competitors by providing extensive resources related to meeting the wealth management
needs of its clients. Assante’s commitment to an integrated approach to wealth management that incorporates all aspects
of managing a client’s fi nances – risk management, estate planning and tax planning, in addition to sound investment
management – is demonstrated through its programs and services. Assante assists its advisors in providing this advanced
level of service through a large in-house staff that includes tax, insurance, estate planning and other experts. In addition,
Assante has launched a practice management initiative providing its clients with clear roadmaps for achieving their wealth
management objectives. An extension of this program is ongoing professional development for Assante advisors, both new
and experienced, in areas such as compliance and advanced fi nancial planning topics.
Assante continues a comprehensive communications program for advisors and clients that provides timely insights from
portfolio managers on market developments and the positioning of their mandates, as well as relevant information on
issues such as income, estate and succession planning. Through initiatives such as the Wealth Matters series, Assante
continues to demonstrate its leadership and a focus on delivering valued advice to Canadians.
11
Assante’s recruiting efforts consist of a two-pronged focus on attracting experienced advisors who embrace its philosophy
of wealth management, as well as younger advisors who will provide ongoing relationship continuity for clients as part of
existing advisory teams. Assante continued to add new advisors in its network in 2012.
Sound advice coupled with fi nancial stability and operating effi ciency is critical in fostering trusting relationships with
clients in the continued uncertainty of today’s environment. Assante’s competitive advantages include the security of CI’s
fi nancial strength, the benefi ts of CI’s experience and support in operations, technology, client services and sales, as well as
its portfolio management expertise and products. With this solid foundation, Assante is pursuing a growth strategy based
on continuing recruitment and fostering the growth of our advisors’ practices through the provision of wealth planning
expertise, enhanced systems support and sophisticated portfolio solutions.
Distribution Partners
In distributing its retail funds, CI maintains solid relationships with fi nancial advisors at numerous fi rms across Canada.
However, our size and fi nancial resources enable us to provide additional sales support and service to certain preferred
partners: Assante, Sun Life advisors and Edward Jones. Our preferred partners continue to make signifi cant contributions
to our sales and growth. Our goal is to strengthen our existing relationships and extend this model into new channels.
CIIAM
CI Institutional Asset Management (CIIAM) experienced 12% growth during the year due to strong net sales and portfolio
returns, and ended the year with $11.5 billion in assets under management. CIIAM operates in two general institutional
markets: Alliance, which typically involves sub-advising mandates or participating in fund-of-fund programs at other
fi nancial institutions, and the more traditional area of pensions, foundations and endowments. The Alliance part of
our operations was awarded two sizable new mandates in 2012. Our pensions and endowments business experienced
another excellent year of client growth with six new clients, bringing the total to 20 new clients won in the past two years
in this segment.
As part of its growth strategy, CIIAM has boosted our commitment to a true multi-manager, multi-product institutional
offering with a core Canadian equity fund, a global equity mandate and a series of target date funds joining our balanced
mandate on our product shelf. The target date funds, the CI LifeCycle Portfolios, which were launched in 2012, are important
solutions for defi ned contribution pension plans as well as other types of employer-sponsored group savings plans.
Driving growth through sales and marketing
CI has successfully established enduring relationships with the thousands of advisors who sell our funds. This is a credit
to our staff in our administration, client services and sales and marketing departments who provide crucial day-to-day
support to advisors. However, our industry has become increasingly competitive and we are not taking advisors and
investors for granted.
12
Sales and marketing is one area where we have increased our commitment to providing superior support and service.
We have responded with initiatives that build awareness of the CI brand, and with a signifi cant expansion of events and
communication efforts that deepen our connections to our clients. In 2012, these initiatives included:
A national advertising campaign for CI Investments with commercials airing on television, radio and websites during the
critical RRSP season. The commercials emphasized CI’s attributes of size, experience, expertise, and a strong product
lineup and ended with the message: “CI – Canada’s Investment Company.” With the success of this initiative, we
instituted a similar campaign with even broader reach in early 2013.
Our second annual Leadership Forum, a three-day conference in Las Vegas that was attended by approximately
800 advisors. Our portfolio managers and CI employees provided extensive information about the markets and our
investment products. We believe that the Leadership Forum has become one of the most highly regarded educational
events in our industry and the 2013 edition is scheduled for October in Los Angeles.
Three national roadshows, in which portfolio management teams presented to advisors in cities from coast to coast.
Two digital roadshows, in which our portfolio managers participated in a full afternoon of webcast presentations.
The launch of the Monthly Review, a newsletter for advisors that contains information about our funds in an eye-
catching newspaper format.
Expanded communications between our portfolio managers and advisors through online platforms such as podcasts,
videocast and online presentations. And, in February 2013, Cambridge Advisors started CI’s fi rst portfolio managers’ blog.
These efforts complement our more traditional written commentaries and in-person events such as dealer branch meetings.
The hiring of a highly qualifi ed wealth management expert to provide tax, estate planning and other wealth planning
information to advisors.
OUTLOOK
In a recent report on the state of the investment fund industry, Investor Economics noted that fewer than half of the
companies in our industry reported positive net infl ows in 2012. Notably, this occurred in a year when global equity
markets experienced double-digit returns and the Canadian fund industry as a whole reported approximately $30 billion
in net sales. In fact, the research fi rm says, the percentage of companies in net redemptions increased to 54% from 38%
over the past two years.
13
Clearly, the divisions in our industry are growing ever larger as sales are increasingly concentrated with a smaller number
of fi rms. CI has anticipated this and other trends highlighted by the Investor Economics report for over a decade and our
strategic direction has ensured that CI remains an industry leader. As we described in this letter, we continue to build on
our competitive advantages, which include:
An exceptional portfolio management lineup
Outstanding fund performance
Economies of scale
Financial strength
Extensive and experienced sales and marketing operations
Strong and diverse distribution relationships
Increasing brand awareness
An entrepreneurial corporate culture.
Our exceptional sales and asset growth in 2012 and the fi rst three months of 2013 is a testament to the validity of our
long-term strategy and the strength of our position within the industry. CI has never been better equipped to compete.
We are operating at a high level across all aspects of our business and providing incredible value to our clients. CI remains
Canada’s premier independent wealth management company, and we see many opportunities for continued growth at
your company.
In closing, we thank our employees and portfolio managers for their dedication, and our fund investors, advisors and our
shareholders for their support.
Sincerely,
William T. Holland
Chairman
MARCH 31, 2013
Stephen A. MacPhail
President and Chief Executive Offi cer
14
15
Ten-Year Historical Financial Highlights
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
( from continuing operations)
Assets under management, end of year
Assets under administration
Total assets
Net sales of funds
Management fees
Other income
Total revenues
Selling, general and administrative
Trailer fees
Other expenses
Total expenses
Income taxes
Net income
EBITDA*
Earnings per share
EBITDA* per share
Dividends per share
2012
75,723
23,199
98,922
Years Ended Dec. 31
2011
2010
69,558
21,544
91,102
72,825
22,497
95,322
2009
64,226
21,489
85,715
973
323
1,059
1,451
1,277.7
180.1
1,457.8
286.0
374.0
294.0
954.0
151.6
352.2
703.6
1.24
2.48
0.96
1,302.8
193.5
1,496.3
1,193.0
186.7
1,379.7
1,041.5
177.0
1,218.5
290.8
379.5
304.9
975.2
144.2
376.9
726.2
1.31
2.53
0.89
263.6
346.2
295.4
905.2
146.0
328.6
669.7
1.14
2.32
0.77
278.9
299.7
298.4
877.0
45.3
296.2
539.3
1.01
1.84
0.63
Shareholders’ equity, end of year
Shares outstanding, end of year
1,676.0
282,914,642
1,620.2
283,567,039
1,566.1
287,434,257
1,610.9
291,821,114
*EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) is not a standardized earnings measure prescribed by IFRS;
however, management believes that most of its shareholders, creditors, other stakeholders and investment analysts prefer to include
the use of this performance measure in analyzing CI’s results. CI’s method of calculating this measure may not be comparable to similar
measures presented by other companies.
TOTAL ASSETS ($ BILLIONS)
100
TOTAL REVENUES ($ MILLIONS)
2000
98.9
95.3
91.1
90.1 92.8
85.7
71.3
81.5
72.8
63.6
80
60
40
20
0
28.8
1,323.4
1,195.1
1,503.0
1,366.2
1,379.7
1,218.5
1,496.3
1,457.8
954.5
805.0
1500
1000
668.4
500
0
’03
’04
’05
May 31
’06
’06†
’07
’08
’09
Dec. 31
’10
’11
’12
’03
’04
’05
May 31
’06
’06†
’07
’08
’09
Dec. 31
’10
’11
’12
† Dec. 2006, seven month period.
† Dec. 2006, seven month period.
16
Years Ended Dec. 31
2007
2008
Seven Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2006
Years Ended May 31
2006
2005
2004
2003
52,801
18,449
71,250
67,171
25,657
92,828
62,737
27,319
90,056
56,905
24,563
81,468
49,055
23,751
72,806
44,223
19,349
63,572
28,773
-
28,773
1,740
1,898
437
3,111
1,717
898
(596)
1,163.8
202.4
1,366.2
1,292.7
210.3
1,503.0
256.4
336.1
340.0
932.5
(17.5)
451.2
638.6
1.62
2.29
1.74
291.1
369.1
291.7
951.9
(54.4)
605.5
724.3
2.15
2.57
2.25
693.8
111.2
805.0
147.8
193.3
140.3
481.4
(31.1)
354.7
403.5
1.25
1.42
1.155
1,110.0
213.4
1,323.4
994.6
200.5
1,195.1
353.6
291.0
204.2
848.8
165.6
309.0
577.4
1.08
2.02
0.70
328.1
250.7
168.3
747.1
163.2
284.7
529.5
0.97
1.81
0.675
820.7
133.8
954.5
256.8
197.8
108.1
562.7
170.7
221.0
442.2
0.82
1.65
0.405
595.8
72.6
668.4
203.3
147.4
197.8
548.5
49.0
71.0
297.4
0.32
1.32
0.29
1,601.7
292,492,805
1,450.7
281,514,003
1,371.1
280,132,687
1,545.0
285,680,519
1,472.8
286,643,091
1,533.9
295,199,027
632.7
235,525,648
EARNINGS PER SHARE ($)
2.50
EBITDA* PER SHARE ($)
3.00
2.15
1.62
1.25
1.08
0.97
0.82
1.31
1.24
1.14
1.01
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.32
0
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0
2.57
2.29
2.53
2.48
2.32
2.02
1.81
1.84
1.65
1.32
1.42
’03
’04
’05
May 31
’06
’06†
’07
’08
’09
Dec. 31
’10
’11
’12
’03
’04
’05
May 31
’06
’06†
’07
’08
’09
Dec. 31
’10
’11
’12
† Dec. 2006, seven month period.
† Dec. 2006, seven month period.
17
Subsidiary Profi les
CI INVESTMENTS INC.
CI Investments is one of Canada’s largest investment management companies, with approximately $80 billion in assets
under management (at March 31, 2013) on behalf of two million Canadians. We are known for our comprehensive and high-
quality selection of investment products and services, operational excellence and effi ciency, and a broad lineup of leading
portfolio management teams. CI Investments has demonstrated a record of innovation and an ability to adapt to meet the
changing demands of the marketplace and its clients.
We partner with independent fi nancial advisors and third-party institutions in the distribution of our products and services,
which include mutual funds, segregated funds, managed solutions, structured products and alternative investments. Our
brands include CI, Harbour, Signature, Synergy, Cambridge, Black Creek, Red Sky, Portfolio Series, Portfolio Select Series,
CI Private Investment Management, and SunWise Essential Series 2. In addition, we manage portfolio solutions under the
United Financial brand, which are available through advisors with Assante Wealth Management. We service the institutional
marketplace through a dedicated division, CI Institutional Asset Management.
CI’s strength is founded on the expertise and experience of its portfolio managers. Our managers, a mix of in-house teams
and sub-advisors, represent the full spectrum of investment disciplines, from value to growth. Our in-house investment
managers include: Signature Global Advisors, led by Eric Bushell; Harbour Advisors, led by Gerry Coleman and Stephen
Jenkins; and Cambridge Advisors, led by Alan Radlo. CI and its managers have been recognized through 33 Morningstar
Canadian Investment Awards over the past 10 years, including the prestigious Analysts’ Choice Investment Fund Company
of the Year in 2006, 2007 and 2009, as well as Morningstar Fund Manager of the Decade in 2010 and Morningstar Fund
Manager of the Year in 2009 for Mr. Bushell. Mr. Coleman is a two-time Fund Manager of the Year, receiving the award
in 2001 and 2008. CI has also been the recipient of 46 Lipper Fund Awards, which recognize funds that have excelled in
delivering consistently strong risk-adjusted performance relative to peers.
18
ASSANTE WEALTH MANAGEMENT (CANADA) LIMITED
Assante Wealth Management is a leading provider of fully integrated wealth management solutions for affl uent Canadians.
With 750 advisors across Canada, our independent advisory network is one of the largest in the country. We serve over
300,000 clients nationwide, administering $24 billion in assets (at March 31, 2013) on their behalf.
The success of Assante is closely linked to our advisors and the strong partnership we have developed with them. Backed
by a wealth of resources, including investment analysts, portfolio managers, tax lawyers, accountants, estate planning
and insurance specialists and wealth planners, Assante advisors provide a comprehensive and integrated approach to
wealth management.
We also support our advisors by providing an industry-leading suite of products and solutions. This includes the United
Financial brand of solutions, Evolution Private Managed Accounts and Optima Strategy, which are managed by CI Investments
Inc. and are available exclusively through Assante advisors. For high net worth clients with more complex wealth planning
needs, Assante offers the Private Client Managed Portfolios through the United Financial division of CI Private Counsel LP.
Our services are offered through Assante Capital Management, an investment dealer, and Assante Financial Management,
a mutual fund dealer, which together operate under the brand name Assante Wealth Management. Stonegate Private
Counsel, a division of CI Private Counsel LP, is a group of experienced professionals who provide wealth planning and inter-
generational fi nancial services to high net worth individuals and families.
19
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis
December 31, 2012
CI Financial Corp.
20
This Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) dated February 14, 2013 presents an analysis of the fi nancial position
of CI Financial Corp. and its subsidiaries (“CI”) as at December 31, 2012, compared with December 31, 2011, and the results
of operations for the year ended and quarter ended December 31, 2012, compared with the year ended and quarter ended
December 31, 2011 and the quarter ended September 30, 2012.
CI’s consolidated fi nancial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards
(“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”). Amounts are expressed in Canadian dollars. The
principal subsidiaries referenced herein include CI Investments Inc. (“CI Investments”) and Assante Wealth Management
(Canada) Ltd. (“AWM”). The Asset Management segment of the business includes the operating results and fi nancial
position of CI Investments and its subsidiaries, including CI Private Counsel LP (“CIPC”). The Asset Administration segment
includes the operating results and fi nancial position of AWM and its subsidiaries, including Assante Capital Management
Ltd. (“ACM”) and Assante Financial Management Ltd. (“AFM”).
This MD&A contains forward-looking statements concerning anticipated future events, results, circumstances, performance
or expectations with respect to CI and its products and services, including its business operations, strategy and fi nancial
performance and condition. When used in this MD&A, such statements use such words as “may”, “will”, “expect”, “believe”,
and other similar terms. These statements are not historical facts but instead represent management beliefs regarding future
events, many of which, by their nature are inherently uncertain and beyond management control. Although management
believes that the expectations refl ected in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such
statements involve risks and uncertainties. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations
include, among other things, general economic and market conditions, including interest and foreign exchange rates, global
fi nancial markets, changes in government regulations or in tax laws, industry competition, technological developments
and other factors described under “Risk Factors” or discussed in other materials fi led with applicable securities regulatory
authorities from time to time. The material factors and assumptions applied in reaching the conclusions contained in these
forward-looking statements include that the investment fund industry will remain stable and that interest rates will remain
relatively stable. The reader is cautioned against undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. For a more complete
discussion of the risk factors that may impact actual results, please refer to the “Risk Factors” section of this MD&A and to
the “Risk Factors” section of CI’s Annual Information Form which is available at www.sedar.com.
This MD&A includes several non-IFRS fi nancial measures that do not have any standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS
and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. However, management believes that most
shareholders, creditors, other stakeholders and investment analysts prefer to include the use of these fi nancial measures
in analyzing CI’s results. These non-IFRS measures and reconciliations to IFRS, where necessary, are shown as highlighted
footnotes to the discussion throughout the document.
21
TABLE 1: SELECTED ANNUAL INFORMATION
(millions, except per share amounts)
Total revenue
Total expenses
Income before income taxes
Income taxes
Net income
Earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share
Dividends recorded per share
FISCAL YEARS ENDING DECEMBER 31
2012
2011
2010
$1,457.8
$1,496.3
$1,379.7
954.0
$503.8
151.6
$352.2
$1.24
$1.24
$0.96
975.2
$521.1
144.2
$376.9
$1.31
$1.31
$0.89
905.1
$474.6
146.0
$328.6
$1.14
$1.13
$0.77
EBITDA (see Table 7)
$703.6
$726.2
$669.7
Total assets
Gross debt
Net debt (gross debt less excess cash)
Average shares outstanding
Shares outstanding
Share price
Market capitalization
$2,971.6
$3,085.0
$3,206.4
$594.4
$526.5
283.4
282.9
$24.93
$7,053.1
$780.4
$730.7
287.0
283.6
$21.10
$5,983.3
$870.4
$789.1
289.1
287.4
$22.50
$6,467.3
22
TABLE 2: SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS
(millions of dollars, except per share amounts)
2012
2011
Q4
Q3
Q2
Q1
Q4
Q3
Q2
Q1
INCOME STATEMENT DATA
Management fees
Administration fees
Other revenues
Total revenues
325.8
318.8
313.5
319.6
312.1
321.4
337.3
332.0
31.7
13.8
30.1
12.6
31.3
14.0
32.8
13.8
30.6
14.0
31.6
14.4
33.2
15.0
36.8
17.9
371.3
361.5
358.8
366.2
356.7
367.4
385.5
386.7
Selling, general & administrative
Trailer fees
Investment dealer fees
Amortization of deferred sales commissions
Interest expense
Other expenses
Total expenses
73.2
95.8
24.7
40.4
6.2
1.7
69.9
93.5
23.3
40.4
6.3
2.5
70.7
91.6
24.5
41.0
6.1
1.9
72.2
93.0
25.8
41.4
6.3
1.6
70.2
90.8
23.8
40.5
6.8
1.6
72.2
93.7
24.8
41.1
7.0
3.0
75.1
98.3
26.0
41.3
6.7
2.4
73.3
96.6
29.1
41.4
7.0
2.5
242.0
235.9
235.8
240.3
233.7
241.8
249.8
249.9
Income before income taxes
129.3
125.6
123.0
125.9
123.0
125.6
135.7
136.8
Income taxes
Net income
Earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share
34.3
95.0
0.34
0.34
34.3
91.3
0.32
0.32
51.7
71.3
0.25
0.25
31.3
94.6
0.33
0.33
35.2
87.8
0.31
0.31
34.8
90.8
0.32
0.31
37.4
98.3
36.7
100.1
0.34
0.34
0.35
0.35
Dividends recorded per share
0.240
0.240
0.240
0.235
0.225
0.225
0.225
0.215
23
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
CI is a diversifi ed wealth management fi rm and one of Canada’s largest independent investment fund companies. The
principal business of CI is the management, marketing, distribution and administration of mutual funds, segregated funds,
structured products and other fee-earning investment products for Canadian investors. They are distributed primarily
through brokers, independent fi nancial planners and insurance advisors, including ACM and AFM fi nancial advisors. CI
operates through two business segments, Asset Management and Asset Administration. The Asset Management segment
provides the majority of CI’s income and derives its revenue principally from the fees earned on the management of
several families of mutual, segregated, pooled and closed-end funds, structured products and discretionary accounts. The
Asset Administration segment derives its revenue principally from commissions and fees earned on the sale of mutual
funds and other fi nancial products and ongoing service to clients.
BUSINESS STRATEGY
CI maximizes shareholder value by increasing and retaining assets under management and assets under administration
on which it earns an acceptable margin. Management believes this can be achieved by focusing on the following factors:
quality and diversity of products offered by CI; experience and depth of investment managers; performance of the funds;
service levels provided to dealers and investors; and the skill and knowledge of its employees.
CI offers investors a wide range of Canadian and international investment products through a network of investment dealers,
mutual fund dealers, and insurance agents, which include advisors with AWM and Sun Life Financial. Several acquisitions of
fund management companies have allowed CI to offer investors what management believes to be the broadest selection of
investment funds in the Canadian mutual fund industry, including the largest lineup of segregated funds.
CI uses three teams of in-house and 15 external investment managers to provide investment advice regarding the portfolios
of the funds. These investment managers typically have long careers in the industry as well as extensive track records with
CI. This lineup of investment managers provides a wide selection of styles and areas of expertise for CI’s funds.
CI selects managers with a reputation for skilled investment management. CI has signifi cantly sized mandates available
to attract the top talent in this fi eld. Many of CI’s investment managers have provided excellent long-term performance
for our largest funds. However, CI can and will make changes to its investment managers when unsatisfactory investment
performance has occurred.
CI is the manager of the funds and provides services that include managing or arranging for the management of investment
portfolios, marketing of the funds, maintaining securityholders’ records and accounts, reporting to the securityholders
and processing transactions relating to securities of the funds. CI has invested in information systems and internal training
of staff to an extent which ensures it provides accurate and timely service to dealers and agents selling CI’s products and
to investors.
24
Management of CI has the specialized skills and knowledge to focus on several key objectives. These include: meeting the
needs of its clients, developing new products, enhancing investor awareness and increasing market share by marketing to
investment dealers, mutual fund dealers and life insurance agents.
KEY PERFORMANCE DRIVERS
CI’s results are driven primarily by the level of its assets under management, which are in turn driven by the returns earned
by its funds and the net sales of its funds. The margin earned on these assets under management determines, to a large
extent, CI’s profi tability.
The returns of each fund refl ect the returns of equities and bonds or other securities held by the fund. These returns will
refl ect the returns of equity and bond indexes plus the over or under performance of the investment manager of each
fund. In years when markets decline (such as 2008) CI’s assets will decline. Conversely, CI’s assets will appreciate in years
when markets perform well. For a particular period, the average assets under management will drive CI’s results as CI
receives the majority of its fees on a daily basis.
Fund sales and acquisitions also affect CI’s assets under management. While sales results help increase assets under
management, they are also an indicator of the level of demand for CI’s products and our success in delivering attractive
products.
CI uses several performance indicators to assess its results. These are described throughout the results of operations and
the discussion of the two operating segments and include the following: net income, earnings per share, pre-tax operating
earnings, EBITDA, EBITDA margin, and dealer gross margin.
2012 OVERVIEW
CI’s average assets under management for 2012 increased 1% from 2011 as a result of the strong performance of CI’s funds
and $973 million in net sales. However, a greater factor in CI’s performance this year was the continued trend of investor
preference for fi xed income products, which generally carry a lower management fee. As well, a larger proportion of CI’s
assets under management are now institutional mandates, which carry a lower management fee. The resulting change in
asset mix reduced management fee revenues by 2% notwithstanding the increase in average assets under management.
This was mitigated by a similar impact on trailer fee expense, which fell 1% year over year, and management’s efforts
to control spending in which selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses dropped 2% during the year. However,
pre-tax operating earnings, as set out in Table 6, still declined 2% in 2012 versus 2011.
While markets in 2012 faced challenges, including lingering concerns over the European debt crisis, the slowing Chinese
economy, and the U.S. “fi scal cliff,” volatility eventually subsided and investors responded. Industry gross sales of funds
picked up in 2012 and CI’s gross sales increased 16% year over year and net sales increased 201% year over year.
25
CI continued to be the third-largest investment fund company in Canada with assets under management of $75.7 billion at
December 31, 2012. CI’s market share is approximately 9%.
According to Morningstar, CI led the entire industry with the most four and fi ve-star rated funds (including multiple
versions) for all of 2012 and has ranked either fi rst or second place for the past 10 years. In addition, CI and its own portfolio
managers have won 47 Canadian Investment Awards since 1998 and 39 Lipper Awards since 2007.
KEY EVENTS
In February, CI announced that it had acquired a signifi cant minority stake in Lawrence Park Capital Partners Ltd., an
alternative asset manager focusing on fi xed-income and credit strategies. This relationship is part of CI’s strategy to seek
selected growth opportunities in the alternative asset management space.
In May, CI held its second annual sales conference, a four-day event attended by over 800 leading investment advisors.
This was an opportunity for advisors to watch presentations and participate in discussions covering economic and fi nancial
issues, and to learn more about CI’s investment products. CI’s sales team, senior management and several portfolio
managers presented their outlooks, opinions and strategies to these key distributors of CI’s funds.
CI introduced several new products during the year as it continued its strategy to provide a broad shelf of products to
its clients and their fi nancial advisors. In January, CI partnered with Sun Life Financial to enhance the SunWise Essential
Series segregated fund program which includes an option to receive guaranteed income for life as early as age 55. CI
Private Investment Management was also added to the program in order to meet the needs of higher net worth investors.
In October, the institutional division of CI Investments announced the offering of CI LifeCycle Portfolios, a multi-asset
class, multi-manager program of seven target date retirement funds that is designed to service pension plan sponsors
and members.
CI continued to expand its in-house portfolio management teams, particularly within the Cambridge team, adding three
new members and the Signature team, adding four new members during the year. This expansion of internal portfolio
management expertise should be viewed in conjunction with the move to reduce the number of external sub-advisory
mandates that have been inherited as part of previous asset management company acquisitions. These changes are made
to improve performance of the funds as well as to reduce SG&A expenses over the long term.
26
ASSETS AND SALES
Total assets, which include mutual, segregated and hedge funds, separately managed accounts, structured products,
pooled assets and assets under administration were $98.9 billion at December 31, 2012, an increase of 9% from $91.1 billion
at December 31, 2011. As shown in Table 3, these assets consisted of $75.7 billion in assets under management and $23.2
billion in assets under administration at December 31, 2012, which increased 9% and 8%, respectively during the year,
primarily due to market performance.
TABLE 3: TOTAL ASSETS
(in billions)
Dec. 31, 2012
Dec. 31, 2011
% change
As at
As at
Assets under management
Assets under administration*
Total assets under management
$75.7
23.2
$98.9
$69.6
21.5
$91.1
9
8
9
*Includes $10.9 billion and $9.8 billion of managed assets in CI and United funds in 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Assets under management form the majority of CI’s total assets and provide most of its revenue and net income. The
change in assets under management during each of the past two years is detailed in Table 4. Gross sales increased in 2012
as CI won additional institutional mandates and strong fund performance led to higher retail sales.
TABLE 4: CHANGE IN ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT
(in billions)
Assets under management at January 1
Gross sales
Redemptions
Net sales
Market performance
2012
2011
$69.6
$72.8
10.6
9.6
1.0
5.1
9.1
8.8
0.3
(3.5)
Assets under management at December 31
$75.7
$69.6
Average assets under management for the year
$72.6
$72.2
27
Table 5 sets out the levels and changes in CI’s average assets under management and the gross and net sales for the relevant
periods. As most of CI’s revenues and expenses are based on assets throughout the year, average asset levels are critical
to the analysis of CI’s fi nancial results.
TABLE 5: CHANGE IN AVERAGE ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT
(in billions)
Quarter ended
Quarter ended
Quarter ended
Dec. 31, 2012
Sept. 30, 2012
Dec. 31, 2011
Average assets under management for the quarter
$74.323
Change to December 31, 2012
$72.437
2.6%
$69.349
7.2%
Gross sales
Net sales
$3.5
$0.7
$2.4
$0.4
$1.7
($0.4)
The Investment Funds Institute of Canada (IFIC) reported $30.4 billion in industry net sales of mutual funds for the year
ended December 31, 2012, up $9.2 billion from net sales of $21.2 billion in the same period for 2011. Total industry assets as
reported by IFIC at December 31, 2012 of $849.7 billion were up 10% from $769.7 billion at December 31, 2011.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012
For the year ended December 31, 2012, CI reported net income of $352.2 million ($1.24 per share) versus $376.9 million ($1.31
per share) for the year ended December 31, 2011. Included in 2011 was $4.9 million ($3.5 million after-tax) in revenue from an
insurance settlement and 2012 included an $18.8 million non-cash future tax provision. Adjusting for these items, the year-
over-year decline in net income was only $2.4 million, or less than 1%.
CI’s pre-tax operating earnings, as set out in Table 6, adjust for the impact of gains and losses on marketable securities,
performance fees and non-recurring items. Redemption fee revenue and the amortization of deferred sales commissions
and fund contracts are netted out to remove the impact of fi nancing back-end assets under management. Pre-tax operating
earnings were $641.5 million in 2012, a decrease of 2% from 2011, refl ecting the decline in management fee revenue as a
result of the change in asset mix toward fi xed-income products.
In 2012, CI recorded $151.6 million in income tax expense for an effective tax rate of 30.1%. In the second quarter of 2012,
CI recorded a non-cash future income tax provision of $18.8 million. Adjusting for this, CI’s effective tax rate for 2012 was
26.4%, compared to an effective tax rate of 27.7% in 2011. CI’s statutory rate for 2012 was 26.5% versus 28.2% in 2011.
For the year ended December 31, 2012, redemption fee revenue was $27.4 million compared with $28.6 million for the year
ended December 31, 2011. The decrease is a result of a decline in redemptions of deferred load funds that are subject to
redemption fees.
28
Other income for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $26.7 million compared to $32.6 million in the prior year. The
decline was primarily due to the non-recurring $4.9 million in insurance proceeds received in 2011.
Amortization of deferred sales commissions and fund contracts was $165.4 million in 2012, a decrease from $166.7 million
in 2011. This represents the average amount of deferred sales commissions paid in the last seven years plus a small amount
of accelerated amortization as deferred load units are redeemed ahead of their seven-year scheduled term. The level of
spending on deferred sales commissions has declined from that of the prior year.
Interest expense of $24.9 million was recorded for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared with $27.5 million for the
year ended December 31, 2011. The decrease in interest expense refl ects lower average debt levels during 2012, as discussed
under “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
Other expenses for the year ended December 31, 2012 were $5.3 million compared to $6.9 million in the prior year. The
decline from the prior year is primarily a result of the elimination of capital taxes payable by CI mid-way through 2011.
As illustrated in Table 7, EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $703.6 million ($2.48 per share) compared with
$726.2 million ($2.53 per share) for the year ended December 31, 2011. The 3% decline is consistent with the above discussion
on pre-tax operating earnings. EBITDA as a percentage of total revenues (EBITDA margin) for 2012 was 48.3%, consistent
with that of 2011.
TABLE 6: PRE-TAX OPERATING EARNINGS
CI uses pre-tax operating earnings to assess its underlying profi tability. CI defi nes pre-tax operating earnings as income
before income taxes less redemption fee revenue, non-recurring items, performance fees and investment gains, plus
amortization of deferred sales commissions (DSC) and fund contracts.
(in millions, except per share amounts)
Dec. 31, 2012
Sept. 30, 2012 Dec. 31, 2011
Dec. 31, 2012
Dec. 31, 2011
Quarter ended Quarter ended Quarter ended
Year ended
Year ended
Income before income taxes
$129.3
$125.6
$123.0
$503.8
$521.1
Less:
Redemption fees
Non-recurring item(s)
Gain (loss) on marketable securities
Add:
Amortization of DSC and fund contracts
Pre-tax operating earnings
per share
6.1
–
0.1
40.9
$164.0
$0.58
6.5
–
–
40.9
$160.0
$0.56
6.9
–
(0.1)
41.1
$157.3
$0.55
27.4
–
0.3
165.4
$641.5
$2.26
28.6
4.9
(0.5)
166.7
$654.8
$2.28
29
QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012
For the quarter ended December 31, 2012, CI reported net income of $95.0 million ($0.34 per share) versus $87.8 million
($0.31 per share) for the quarter ended December 31, 2011 and $91.3 million ($0.32 per share) for the quarter ended
September 30, 2012. Average assets under management for the fourth quarter of 2012 were up 2.6% from the level of
the third quarter and 7.2% from the fourth quarter of 2011.
Pre-tax operating earnings were $164.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2012, an increase of 4% from $157.3 million in the
fourth quarter of 2011 and 2% higher than the $160.0 million in the prior quarter. These increases refl ect the change in
assets under management as well as the change in asset mix, which reduced management fee revenues.
For the fourth quarter of 2012, CI recorded $34.3 million in income tax expense for an effective tax rate of 26.5%,
compared to $35.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2011 for an effective tax rate of 28.6%. The third quarter of 2012
included $34.3 million in income tax expense, for an effective tax rate of 27.3%. The decrease in the year over year
effective tax rates refl ects the decrease in statutory tax rates.
For the quarter ended December 31, 2012, redemption fee revenue was $6.1 million compared with $6.9 million for the
quarter ended December 31, 2011 and $6.5 million from the quarter ended September 30, 2012. The decrease from these
prior periods relates to a decrease in redemptions from deferred load funds.
TABLE 7: EBITDA AND EBITDA MARGIN
CI uses EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) to assess its underlying profi tability prior
to the impact of its fi nancing structure, income taxes and the amortization of deferred sales commissions, fund contracts
and capital assets. This also permits comparisons of companies within the industry, before any distortion caused by different
fi nancing methods, levels of taxation and mix of business between front-end and back-end sales commission assets under
management. EBITDA is a measure of operating performance, a facilitator for valuation and a proxy for cash fl ow.
(in millions, except per share amounts)
Dec. 31, 2012
Sept. 30, 2012
Dec. 31, 2011
Dec. 31, 2012
Dec. 31, 2011
Quarter ended Quarter ended Quarter ended
Year ended
Year ended
Net income
Add (deduct):
Interest expense
Income tax expense
Amortization of DSC and fund contracts
Amortization of other items
EBITDA
per share
EBITDA margin (as a % of revenue)
$95.0
$91.3
$87.8
$352.2
$376.9
6.2
34.3
40.9
2.4
$178.8
$0.63
48.2%
6.3
34.3
40.9
2.4
$175.2
$0.62
48.5%
6.8
35.2
41.1
2.7
$173.6
$0.61
48.7%
24.9
151.6
165.4
9.5
$703.6
$2.48
48.3%
27.5
144.2
166.7
10.9
$726.2
$2.53
48.5%
30
Amortization of deferred sales commissions and fund contracts was $40.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2012, a
decrease from $41.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2011 and unchanged from the third quarter of 2012. The trend of lower
amortization expense is consistent with the trend in lower spending on deferred sales commissions in recent years.
Interest expense of $6.2 million was recorded for the quarter ended December 31, 2012 compared with $6.8 million for
the quarter ended December 31, 2011 and $6.3 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2012. As mentioned earlier,
the decrease in interest expense from the prior year period refl ected lower average debt levels, as discussed under
“Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
As illustrated in Table 7, EBITDA for the quarter ended December 31, 2012 was $178.8 million ($0.63 per share) compared
with $173.6 million ($0.61 per share) for the quarter ended December 31, 2011 and $175.2 million ($0.62 per share) for the
quarter ended September 30, 2012. The 3% year-over-year increase in quarterly EBITDA refl ects the increase in average
assets under management offset by the effect of the change in asset mix. EBITDA as a percentage of total revenues
(EBITDA margin) for the fourth quarter of 2012 was 48.2%, down slightly from 48.7% in the last quarter of 2011 and 48.5%
in the prior quarter.
ASSET MANAGEMENT SEGMENT
The Asset Management segment is CI’s principal business segment and includes the operating results and fi nancial
position of CI Investments and CIPC.
TABLE 8: RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – ASSET MANAGEMENT SEGMENT
The following table presents the operating results for the Asset Management segment:
(in millions)
Dec. 31, 2012
Sept. 30, 2012
Dec. 31, 2011
Dec. 31, 2012
Dec. 31, 2011
Quarter ended Quarter ended Quarter ended
Year ended
Year ended
Management fees
Other revenue
Total revenue
Selling, general and administrative
Trailer fees
Amortization of deferred sales commissions
and fund contracts
Other expenses
Total expenses
Income before taxes
$325.8
10.1
$335.9
$59.6
99.7
41.6
0.3
$318.8
9.0
$327.8
$57.7
97.4
41.6
1.1
$312.1
10.2
$322.3
$57.3
94.3
41.8
0.8
$201.2
$197.8
$194.2
$1,277.7
$1,302.8
39.0
45.5
$1,316.7
$1,348.3
$233.3
389.1
168.1
2.0
$792.5
$235.9
394.1
169.7
4.1
$803.8
and non-segmented items
$134.7
$130.0
$128.1
$524.2
$544.5
31
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012
Revenues
Revenues from management fees were $1,278 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, a decrease of 2% from $1,303
million for the year ended December 31, 2011. While average assets under management were up 1% year over year, the
change in asset mix toward fi xed-income products and institutional mandates reduced the average management fee rate
in 2012 to 1.760% from 1.805% in 2011.
For the year ended December 31, 2012, other revenue was $39.0 million versus $45.5 million for the year ended December 31,
2011. The largest component of other revenue is redemption fees. Redemption fees were $27.4 million for 2012 compared
with $28.6 million for 2011. The prior year also included $4.9 million in proceeds from an insurance settlement.
Expenses
SG&A expenses for the Asset Management segment were $233.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, a decrease
from $235.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. As a percentage of average assets under management, SG&A
expenses were 0.321% in 2012 and 0.327% in 2011, as spending declined 1.1% and average assets were up 0.6%. Although
spending was increased on certain product initiatives and on in-house portfolio management teams, offsetting cost
savings were found in other areas of the business.
Trailer fees were $389.1 million for 2012 compared with $394.1 million for 2011. Net of inter-segment amounts, this expense
was $374.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 versus $379.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The
decline in trailer fee expense is a result of the change in asset mix, as lower trailer fees are paid on fi xed-income products
compared to equity products, and institutional funds where trailers are typically not paid.
Amortization of deferred sales commissions and fund contracts was $168.1 million for 2012, down from $169.7 million for
the prior year. This change is consistent with the change in deferred sales commissions paid in recent years and the amount
of accelerated amortization related to redemptions of deferred load funds.
Other expenses were $2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to $4.1 million in the year ended
December 31, 2011. The decline in these expenses is primarily due to the legislated elimination of capital taxes on CI in 2011.
Income before income taxes and interest expense for CI’s principal segment was $524.2 million for 2012, compared
with $544.5 million in 2011. The decrease from the prior year is primarily due to the change in asset mix which reduced
management fee revenue.
32
QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012
Revenues
Revenues from management fees were $325.8 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2012, an increase of 4% from
$312.1 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2011 and 2% from $318.8 million for the quarter ended September 30,
2012. The changes were mainly attributable to increases in average assets under management, which were up 7.2% and up
2.6% from the quarters ended December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2012, respectively. The average management fee rate
declined from 1.786% in the fourth quarter of 2011 to 1.751% in the third quarter of 2012 and to 1.744% in the fourth quarter
of 2012, again as a result of the change in asset mix.
For the quarter ended December 31, 2012, other revenue was $10.1 million versus $10.2 million and $9.0 million for the
quarters ended December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2012, respectively. The largest component of other revenue is
redemption fees, which were $6.1 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2012 compared with $6.9 million and $6.5
million for the quarters ended December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2012, respectively.
Expenses
SG&A expenses for the Asset Management segment were $59.6 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2012, an increase
from $57.3 million for the fourth quarter in 2011 and from $57.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2012. As a
percentage of average assets under management, SG&A expenses were 0.319% for the quarter ended December 31, 2012,
down from 0.328% for the quarter ended December 31, 2011 and up slightly from 0.317% for the quarter ended September
30, 2012. Generally, the decrease in this rate over time results from CI’s ongoing drive to fi nd operating effi ciencies in its
fi xed costs, which account for a large proportion of CI’s total costs. At the same time, in any given quarter, management
may choose to increase or decrease discretionary spending.
Trailer fees were $99.7 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2012 compared with $94.3 million for the quarter ended
December 31, 2011 and $97.4 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2012. Net of inter-segment amounts, this expense
was $95.8 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2012 versus $90.8 million for the fourth quarter of 2011 and $93.5
million for the third quarter of 2012. The increase from the comparable periods is primarily due to the respective increases
in average assets under management, tempered by the changes in asset mix.
Amortization of deferred sales commissions and fund contracts, before intersegment eliminations, was $41.6 million for
the quarter ended December 31, 2012, down from $41.8 million in the same quarter last year and unchanged from the
previous quarter. This decrease is consistent with the decrease in deferred sales commissions paid in the past several years.
Income before income taxes and interest expense for CI’s principal segment was $134.7 million for the quarter ended
December 31, 2012 compared with $128.1 million in the same period in 2011 and $130.0 million in the previous quarter.
Income has generally increased in line with the increase in average assets under management over the comparable periods.
33
ASSET ADMINISTRATION SEGMENT
The Asset Administration segment includes the operating results and fi nancial position of AWM and its subsidiaries.
TABLE 9: RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – ASSET ADMINISTRATION SEGMENT
The following table presents the operating results for the Asset Administration segment:
(in millions)
Dec. 31, 2012
Sept. 30, 2012
Dec. 31, 2011
Dec. 31, 2012
Dec. 31, 2011
Quarter ended Quarter ended Quarter ended
Year ended
Year ended
Administration fees
Other revenue
Total revenue
Selling, general and administrative
Investment dealer fees
Amortization of fund contracts
Other expenses
Total expenses
Income before taxes
$55.2
3.7
$58.9
$13.6
43.6
0.4
0.8
$58.4
$52.6
3.6
$56.2
$12.3
41.3
0.4
0.8
$54.8
$52.5
3.8
$56.3
$12.9
41.5
0.4
0.2
$220.7
15.0
$235.7
$52.7
174.5
1.6
3.2
$226.2
15.6
$241.8
$54.8
179.5
1.5
2.8
$55.0
$232.0
$238.6
and non-segmented items
$0.5
$1.4
$1.3
$3.7
$3.2
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012
Revenues
Administration fees are earned on assets under administration in the AWM business and from the administration of third-
party business. These fees were $220.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, a decrease of 2% from $226.2 million for
the same period last year. Net of inter-segment amounts, administration fee revenue was $126.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2012, down from $132.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The decrease from the prior year is a
result of lower commission revenue earned on the sale of mutual funds and other securities. Administration fees should be
considered in conjunction with investment dealer fees, an expense that represents the payout to fi nancial advisors.
Other revenues earned by the Asset Administration segment are generally derived from non-advisor related activities.
For 2012, other revenues were $15.0 million, decreasing slightly from $15.6 million for 2011.
34
Expenses
Investment dealer fees represent the payout to advisors on revenues they generate and were $174.5 million for the year
ended December 31, 2012, compared to $179.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The decrease in these fees
relates directly to the decrease in administration fee revenues discussed above.
As detailed in Table 10, dealer gross margin was $46.2 million or 21.0% of administration fee revenue for 2012, compared
to $46.7 million or 20.6% for 2011. The change in gross margin from the prior period relates to the change in average
investment dealer fees paid out to fi nancial advisors on their administration fees. Generally, as an advisor’s assets under
administration and administration fee revenues grow, the payout rates to the respective advisor will correspondingly
increase up to a maximum payout rate.
SG&A expenses for the segment were $52.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to $54.8 million in the
year ended December 31, 2011. The level of discretionary spending decreased during 2012 compared to 2011.
The Asset Administration segment had income before income taxes and non-segmented items of $3.7 million for 2012, up
from $3.2 million in 2011. This increase is a result of the decline in SG&A spend and dealer gross margin rose slightly year
over year.
TABLE 10: DEALER GROSS MARGIN
CI monitors its operating profi tability on the revenues earned within its Asset Administration segment by measuring the
dealer gross margin, which is calculated as administration fee revenue less investment dealer fees, divided by administration
fee revenue. CI uses this measure to assess the margin remaining after the payout to advisors.
(in millions)
Dec. 31, 2012
Sept. 30, 2012
Dec. 31, 2011
Dec. 31, 2012
Dec. 31, 2011
Quarter ended Quarter ended Quarter ended
Year ended
Year ended
Administration fees
Less:
$55.2
$52.6
$52.5
$220.7
$226.2
Investment dealer fees
43.6
41.3
41.5
174.5
179.5
Dealer gross margin
$11.6
21.1%
$11.3
21.4%
$11.0
21.0%
$46.2
21.0%
$46.7
20.6%
35
QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012
Revenues
Administration fees were $55.2 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2012, an increase of 5% from $52.5 million for the
same period last year and an increase of 5% from the prior quarter. Net of inter-segment amounts, administration fee revenue
was $31.7 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2012, up from $30.6 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2011 and
from $30.1 million in the previous quarter. The increase from the prior year was primarily attributable to an increase in assets
under administration during the fourth quarter of 2012 leading to higher trailer commissions earned.
As mentioned above, other revenues earned by the Asset Administration segment are mainly comprised of non-advisor
related activities. For the quarter ended December 31, 2012, other revenues were $3.7 million, down from $3.8 million for
the fourth quarter of 2011 and up from $3.6 million in the third quarter of 2012.
Expenses
Investment dealer fees were $43.6 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2012, compared to $41.5 million for the
fourth quarter of 2012 and $41.3 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2012.
As detailed in Table 10, dealer gross margin was $11.6 million or 21.1% of administration fee revenue for the quarter ended
December 31, 2012 compared to $11.0 million or 21.0% for the fourth quarter of 2011 and $11.3 million or 21.4% for the
previous quarter. The changes in gross margin from the comparable quarters correspond to the level of payout to fi nancial
advisors on their 12-month rolling administration fee revenues.
SG&A expenses for the segment were $13.6 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2012 compared to $12.9 million in
the fourth quarter of 2011 and $12.3 million in the third quarter of 2012, as the spending on marketing initiatives increased
during the quarter.
The Asset Administration segment had income before income taxes and non-segmented items of $0.5 million for the
quarter ended December 31, 2012, down from $1.3 million for the fourth quarter of 2011 and from $1.4 million for the prior
quarter. The decline in the fourth quarter of 2012 was due to the increase in SG&A expenses exceeding the increase in
gross margin.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
As detailed in Table 11, CI generated $548.1 million of operating cash fl ow in the year ended December 31, 2012 down
$26.6 million from $574.7 million in 2011. CI measures its operating cash fl ow before the change in working capital and the
actual cash amount paid for interest and income taxes, as these items often distort the cash fl ow generated during the
period. Working capital is affected by seasonality, interest is primarily paid semi-annually, and tax instalments paid may
differ materially from the cash tax accrual. CI’s main uses of capital are the fi nancing of deferred sales commissions, the
payment of dividends on its shares, the funding of capital expenditures and the repurchase of shares through its normal
course issuer bid program. At current levels of cash fl ow and anticipated dividend payout rates, CI produces suffi cient
cash to meet its obligations and pay down debt.
36
TABLE 11: SUMMARY OF CASH FLOWS
(in millions)
Operating Cash Flow
Less:
Deferred sales commission paid
Marketable securities, net
Capital expenditures
Share repurchases
Dividends paid
Debt repaid
Working capital and other
Net change in cash
Cash at January 1
Cash at December 31
Year ended
Year ended
Dec. 31, 2012
Dec. 31, 2011
$548.1
$574.7
124.2
21.5
5.6
30.5
269.2
187.0
8.6
646.6
(98.5)
122.6
$24.1
141.2
11.6
21.5
95.2
254.2
90.9
54.0
668.6
(93.9)
216.5
$122.6
CI paid sales commissions of $124.2 million in 2012 compared to $141.2 million in 2011. The decrease in sales commissions
from the prior year is consistent with the trend to lower sales of deferred load funds.
CI invested $26.8 million in marketable securities in 2012. During the same period, CI received proceeds of $5.3 million
from the disposition of marketable securities, resulting in a gain of $0.3 million. The fair value of marketable securities
at December 31, 2012 was $66.2 million. Marketable securities are comprised of seed capital investments in its funds and
strategic investments.
During the year ended December 31, 2012, CI incurred capital expenditures of $5.6 million, primarily relating to leasehold
improvements and investments in technology.
During the year, CI repurchased 1.4 million shares at a cost of $30.5 million under its normal course issuer bid. CI declared
dividends of $271.9 million ($269.2 million paid), which was less than net income for the year by $80.3 million. At year end,
CI’s dividend payments were $0.08 per share per month, or approximately $272 million per fi scal year.
The statement of fi nancial position for CI at December 31, 2012 refl ects total assets of $2.972 billion, a decrease of $113.0
million from $3.085 billion at December 31, 2011. This change can be attributed to a decrease in current assets of $71.2
million and a decrease in long-term assets of $42.2 million.
CI’s cash and cash equivalents decreased by $98.4 million in 2012 primarily due to the repayment of a debenture that
matured on December 17, 2012. Marketable securities increased by $24.1 million due to a $20.0 million investment along
with some smaller investments. Accounts receivable and prepaid expenses remain relatively unchanged at $70.6 million
compared to $70.2 million.
37
Deferred sales commissions decreased $38.9 million to $452.3 million as a result of the $163.1 million in amortization
expense offset by the $124.2 million in sales commissions paid. Capital assets decreased $2.7 million during the year as a
result of $8.3 million amortized during the year offset by $5.6 million in capital additions.
Total liabilities decreased by $169.2 million during 2012 to $1.296 billion at December 31, 2012. The primary contributors to
this change were a $186.0 million decrease in long-term debt offset by a $17.8 million increase in future income taxes. The
increase in future income taxes relates to the Ontario government’s decision to rescind previously legislated reductions
in corporate tax rates.
On December 17, 2012, CI repaid $250 million of debentures that matured. At December 31, 2012, CI had $500 million in
outstanding debentures at an average interest rate of 3.51% with a carrying value of $498.4 million. In addition, CI had
$96.0 million drawn against its credit facility at an average rate of 1.83%. At December 31, 2011, CI had $780.4 million of
debt outstanding at an average rate of 3.19%. Net of cash and marketable securities, debt was $504.1 million at December
31, 2012, down from $615.7 million at December 31, 2011. The average debt level for the year ended December 31, 2012 was
approximately $749 million, compared to $848 million for 2011.
As mentioned earlier, at December 31, 2012 CI had drawn $96.0 million against its $250 million credit facility. Principal
repayments on any drawn amounts are only required should the bank decide not to renew the facility on its anniversary,
in which case 6.25% of the principal would be repaid at each calendar quarter-end, with the balance payable at the end
of the credit facility term (March 14, 2015). These payments would be payable beginning March 31, 2013 should the bank
not renew the facility.
CI’s current ratio of debt (net of excess cash) to EBITDA is at 0.7 to 1, well below CI’s long-term target of 1 to 1. CI expects
that, absent acquisitions in which debt is increased, excess cash fl ow will be used to pay down debt and the ratio of debt
to EBITDA will trend lower. CI is within its fi nancial covenants with respect to its credit facility, which requires that the
debt-to-EBITDA ratio remain below 2.5 to 1, and assets under management not fall below $40 billion, based on a rolling
30-day average.
Shareholders’ equity increased by $55.8 million in 2012 to $1.676 billion at December 31, 2012 which approximates net
income less dividends and share repurchases.
RISK MANAGEMENT
There is risk inherent in the conduct of a wealth management business. Some factors which introduce or exacerbate risk
are within the control of management and others are by their nature outside of direct control but must still be managed.
Effective risk management is a key component to achieving CI’s business objectives. It requires management to identify
and anticipate risks in order to develop strategies and procedures which minimize or avoid negative consequences.
Management has developed an approach to risk management that involves executives in each core business unit and
operating area of CI. These executives identify and evaluate risks, applying both a quantitative and a qualitative analysis
and then assess the likelihood of occurrence of a particular risk. The fi nal step in the process is to identify mitigating
factors or strategies and a course for implementing mitigation procedures.
38
The disclosures below provide a summary of the key risks and uncertainties that affect CI’s fi nancial performance. For a
more complete discussion of the risk factors which may adversely impact CI’s business, please refer to the “Risk Factors”
section of CI’s Annual Information Form, which is available at www.sedar.com.
MARKET RISK
Market risk is the risk of a fi nancial loss resulting from adverse changes in underlying market factors, such as interest rates, foreign
exchange rates, and equity and commodity prices. A description of each component of market risk is described below:
Interest rate risk is the risk of gain or loss due to the volatility of interest rates.
Foreign exchange rate risk is the risk of gain or loss due to volatility of foreign exchange rates.
Equity risk is the risk of gain or loss due to the changes in prices and volatility of individual equity instruments
and equity indexes.
CI’s fi nancial performance is indirectly exposed to market risk. Any decline in fi nancial markets or lack of sustained
growth in such markets may result in a corresponding decline in performance and may adversely affect CI’s assets under
management, management fees and revenues, which would reduce cash fl ow to CI and ultimately impact CI’s ability to
pay dividends.
Asset Management Segment
CI is subject to market risk throughout its Asset Management business segment. The following is a description of how CI
mitigates the impact this risk has on its fi nancial position and operating earnings.
Management of market risk within CI’s assets under management is the responsibility of the Chief Operating Offi cer, with
the assistance of the Chief Compliance Offi cer. CI has a control environment that ensures risks are reviewed regularly and
that risk controls throughout CI are operating in accordance with regulatory requirements. CI’s compliance group carefully
reviews the exposure to interest rate risk, foreign currency risk and equity risk. When a particular market risk is identifi ed,
portfolio managers of the funds are directed to mitigate the risk by reducing their exposure.
At December 31, 2012, approximately 26% of CI’s assets under management were held in fi xed-income securities, which
are exposed to interest rate risk. An increase in interest rates causes market prices of fi xed-income securities to fall, while
a decrease in interest rates causes market prices to rise. CI estimates that a 50 basis point change in the value of these
securities would cause a change of about $1 million in annual pre-tax earnings in the Asset Management segment.
At December 31, 2012, about 65% of CI’s assets under management were based in Canadian currency, which diminishes the
exposure to foreign exchange risk. However, at the same time, approximately 20% of CI’s assets under management were
based in U.S. currency. Any change in the value of the Canadian dollar relative to U.S. currency will cause fl uctuations
in CI’s assets under management upon which CI’s management fees are calculated. CI estimates that a 10% change in
Canadian/U.S. exchange rates would cause a change of about $16 million in the Asset Management segment’s annual
pre-tax earnings.
39
About 67% of CI’s assets under management were held in equity securities at December 31, 2012, which are subject to
equity risk. Equity risk is classifi ed into two categories: general equity risk and issuer-specifi c risk. CI employs internal and
external fund managers to take advantage of these individuals’ expertise in particular market niches, sectors and products
and to reduce issuer-specifi c risk through diversifi cation. CI estimates that a 10% change in the prices of equity indexes
would cause a change of about $56 million in annual pre-tax earnings.
Asset Administration Segment
CI’s Asset Administration business is exposed to market risk. The following is a description of how CI mitigates the impact
this risk has on its fi nancial position and results of operations.
Risk management for administered assets is the responsibility of the Chief Compliance Offi cer and senior management.
Responsibilities include ensuring policies, processes and internal controls are in place and in accordance with regulatory
requirements. CI’s internal audit department reviews CI’s adherence to these policies and procedures.
CI’s operating results are not materially exposed to market risk impacting the asset administration segment given that this
segment usually generates less than 1% of the total income before non-segmented items (this segment had income of $3.7
million before income taxes and non-segmented items for the year ended December 31, 2012). Investment advisors regularly
review their client portfolios to assess market risk and consult with clients to make appropriate changes to mitigate it. The
effect of a 10% change in any component of market risk (comprised of interest rate risk, foreign exchange risk and equity risk)
would have resulted in a change of less than $1 million to the Asset Administration segment’s pre-tax earnings.
CREDIT RISK
Credit risk is the risk of loss associated with the inability of a third party to fulfi ll its payment obligations. CI is exposed
to the risk that third parties that owe it money, securities or other assets will not perform their obligations. These parties
include trading counterparties, customers, clearing agents, exchanges, clearing houses and other fi nancial intermediaries,
as well as issuers whose securities are held by CI. These parties may default on their obligations due to bankruptcy, lack
of liquidity, operational failure or other reasons. CI does not have a signifi cant exposure to any individual counterparty.
Credit risk is mitigated by regularly monitoring the credit performance of each individual counterparty and holding
collateral where appropriate.
One of the primary sources of credit risk arises when CI extends credit to clients to purchase securities by way of margin
lending. Margin loans are due on demand and are collateralized by the fi nancial instruments in the client’s account. CI
faces a risk of fi nancial loss in the event a client fails to meet a margin call if market prices for securities held as collateral
decline and if CI is unable to recover suffi cient value from the collateral held. The credit extended is limited by regulatory
requirements and by CI’s internal credit policy. Credit risk is managed by dealing with counterparties CI believes to be
creditworthy and by actively monitoring credit and margin exposure and the fi nancial health of the counterparties. CI has
concluded that current economic and credit conditions have not signifi cantly impacted its fi nancial assets.
40
LIQUIDITY RISK
Liquidity risk is the risk that CI may not be able to generate suffi cient funds and within the time required in order to meet
its obligations as they come due. While CI currently has access to fi nancing, unfavourable market conditions may affect
the ability of CI to obtain loans or make other arrangements on terms acceptable to CI.
STRATEGIC RISKS
Strategic risks are risks that directly impact the overall direction of CI and the ability of CI to successfully implement
proposed strategies. The key strategic risk is the risk that management fails to anticipate, and respond to changes in the
business environment including demographic and competitive changes. CI’s performance is directly affected by fi nancial
market and business conditions, including the legislation and policies of the governments and regulatory authorities having
jurisdiction over CI’s operations. These are beyond the control of CI; however, an important part of the risk management
process is the on-going review and assessment of industry and economic trends and changes. Strategies are then designed
to mitigate the impact of any anticipated changes, including the introduction of new products and cost control strategies.
DISTRIBUTION RISK
CI distributes its investment products through a number of distribution channels including brokers, independent fi nancial
planners and insurance advisors. CI’s access to these distribution channels is impacted by the strength of the relationship
with certain business partners and the level of competition faced from the fi nancial institutions that own those channels.
While CI continues to develop and enhance existing relationships, there can be no assurance that CI will continue to enjoy
the level of access that it has in the past, which would adversely affect its sales of investment products.
OPERATIONAL RISKS
Operational risks are risks related to the actions, or failure in the processes, that support the business including
administration, information technology, product development and marketing. The administrative services provided by CI
depend on software supplied by third-party suppliers. Failure of a key supplier, the loss of these suppliers’ products, or
problems or errors related to such products would have a material adverse effect on the ability of CI to provide these
administrative services. Changes to the pricing arrangement with such third-party suppliers because of upgrades or other
circumstances could have an adverse effect upon the profi tability of CI. There can be no assurances that CI’s systems
will operate or that CI will be able to prevent an extended systems failure in the event of a subsystem component or
software failure or in the event of an earthquake, fi re or any other natural disaster, or a power or telecommunications
failure. Any systems failure that causes interruptions in the operations of CI could have a material adverse effect on its
business, fi nancial condition and operating results. CI may also experience losses in connection with employee errors.
Although expenses incurred by CI in connection with employee errors have not been signifi cant in the past, there can be
no assurances that these expenses will not increase in the future.
TAXATION RISK
CI is subject to various uncertainties concerning the interpretation and application of Canadian tax laws. If tax authorities
disagree with CI’s application of such tax laws, CI’s profi tability and cash fl ows could be adversely affected. CI Investments
is considered a large case fi le by the Canada Revenue Agency, and as such, is subject to audit each year. There is a
signifi cant lag between the end of a fi scal year and when such audits are completed. Therefore, at any given time, several
years may be open for audit and/or adjustment.
41
COMPETITION
CI operates in a highly competitive environment, with competition based on a variety of factors, including the range
of products offered, brand recognition, investment performance, business reputation, fi nancing strength, the strength
and continuity of institutional, management and sales relationships, quality of service, level of fees charged and level
of commissions and other compensation paid. CI competes with a large number of mutual fund companies and other
providers of investment products, investment management fi rms, broker-dealers, banks, insurance companies and other
fi nancial institutions. Some of these competitors have greater capital and other resources, and offer more comprehensive
lines of products and services than CI. The trend toward greater consolidation within the investment management
industry has increased the strength of a number of CI’s competitors. Additionally, there are few barriers to entry by new
investment management fi rms, and the successful efforts of new entrants have resulted in increased competition. CI’s
competitors seek to expand market share by offering different products and services than those offered by CI. While CI
continues to develop and market new products and services, there can be no assurance that CI will maintain its current
standing or market share, and that may adversely affect the business, fi nancial condition or operating results of CI.
REGULATORY AND LEGAL RISK
Certain subsidiaries of CI are heavily regulated in all jurisdictions where they carry on business. Laws and regulations
applied at the national and provincial level generally grant governmental agencies and self-regulatory bodies broad
administrative discretion over the activities of CI, including the power to limit or restrict business activities as well as
impose additional disclosure requirements on CI products and services. Possible sanctions include the revocation or
imposition of conditions on licenses to operate certain businesses, the suspension or expulsion from a particular market
or jurisdiction of any of CI’s business segments or its key personnel or fi nancial advisors, and the imposition of fi nes and
censures. It is also possible that the laws and regulations governing a subsidiary’s operations or particular investment
products or services could be amended or interpreted in a manner that is adverse to CI. To the extent that existing or
future regulations affecting the sale or offering of CI’s product or services or CI’s investment strategies cause or contribute
to reduced sales of CI’s products or lower margins or impair the investment performance of CI’s products, CI’s aggregate
assets under management and its revenues may be adversely affected.
Certain subsidiaries of CI are subject to minimum regulatory capital requirements. This may require CI to keep suffi cient cash
and other liquid assets on hand to maintain capital requirements rather than using them in connection with its business.
Failure to maintain required regulatory capital by CI may subject it to fi nes, suspension or revocation of registration by
the relevant securities regulator. A signifi cant operating loss by a registrant subsidiary or an unusually large charge against
regulatory capital could adversely affect the ability of CI to expand or even maintain its present level of business, which
could have a material adverse effect on CI’s business, results of operations, fi nancial condition and prospects.
Given the nature of CI’s business, CI may from time to time be subject to claims or complaints from investors or others
in the normal course of business. The legal risks facing CI, its directors, offi cers, employees or agents in this respect
include potential liability for violations of securities laws, breach of fi duciary duty and misuse of investors’ funds. Some
violations of securities laws and breach of fi duciary duty could result in civil liability, fi nes, sanctions, or expulsion from a
self-regulatory organization or the suspension or revocation of CI’s subsidiaries’ right to carry on their existing business. CI
may incur signifi cant costs in connection with such potential liabilities.
42
COMMITMENT OF FINANCIAL ADVISORS AND OTHER KEY PERSONNEL
The market for fi nancial advisors is extremely competitive and is increasingly characterized by frequent movement by
fi nancial advisors among different fi rms. Individual fi nancial advisors of AWM have regular direct contact with clients,
which can lead to a strong and personal client relationship based on the client’s trust in the individual fi nancial advisor.
The loss of a signifi cant number of fi nancial advisors could lead to the loss of client accounts which could have a material
adverse effect on the results of operations and prospects of AWM, and, in turn, CI. Although AWM uses or has used a
combination of competitive compensation structures and equity with vesting provisions as a means of seeking to retain
fi nancial advisors, there can be no assurance that fi nancial advisors will remain with AWM.
The success of CI is also dependent upon, among other things, the skills and expertise of its human resources including
the management and investment personnel and its personnel with skills related to, among other things, marketing, risk
management, credit, information technology, accounting, administrative operations and legal affairs. These individuals
play an important role in developing, implementing, operating, managing and distributing CI’s products and services.
Accordingly, the recruitment of competent personnel, continuous training and transfer of knowledge are key activities
that are essential to CI’s performance. In addition, the growth in total assets under management in the industry and the
reliance on investment performance to sell fi nancial products have increased the demand for experienced and high-
performing portfolio managers. Compensation packages for these managers may increase at a rate well in excess of
infl ation and well above the rates of increase observed in other industries and the rest of the labour market. CI believes
that it has the resources necessary for the operation of CI’s business. The loss of these individuals or an inability to attract,
retain and motivate a suffi cient number of qualifi ed personnel could adversely affect CI’s business.
INFORMATION REGARDING GUARANTORS
The following tables provide unaudited consolidated fi nancial information for CI, CI Investments and non-guarantor
subsidiaries for the periods identifi ed below, presented with a separate column for: (i) CI; (ii) CI Investments, (iii) the non-
guarantor subsidiaries of CI on a combined basis [the “Other Subsidiaries”); (iv) consolidating adjustments; and (v) the total
consolidated amounts.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31* (unaudited)
(in millions of dollars)
2012
2011
2012
2011
2012
2011
2012
2011
2012
2011
CI Financial
CI Investments
Subsidiaries
Adjustments
Amounts
Other
Consolidating
Consolidated
Total
Revenue
Net income
225.3
669.8 1,289.5
1,358.4
389.0
395.7
(446.1)
(927.6) 1,457.7
1,496.3
211.0
654.4
312.8
380.0
39.3
37.1 (210.9)
(694.6)
352.2
376.9
*Some comparative fi gures have been reclassed to conform to the presentation in the current year.
43
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION DATA AS AT DECEMBER 31* (unaudited)
(in millions of dollars)
2012
2011
2012
2011
2012
2011
2012
2011
2012
2011
CI Financial
CI Investments
Subsidiaries
Adjustments
Amounts
Other
Consolidating
Consolidated
Total
Current assets
215.6
486.8
206.2
170.2
196.4
199.9
(329.6)
(497.1)
288.6
359.8
Non-current assets
1,836.2
1,697.5 2,875.6
2,936.1
176.3
137.4 (2,205.1) (2,045.8) 2,683.0
2,725.2
Current liabilities
70.0
301.9
116.1
106.9
152.9
150.4
(16.5)
(3.3)
322.5
555.9
Non-current liabilities
270.7
222.1 1,129.8
1,302.0
0.5
0.2
(427.9)
(615.4)
973.1
908.9
*Some comparative fi gures have been reclassed to conform to the presentation in the current year.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Bank of Nova Scotia (“Scotiabank”) owns approximately 37% of the common shares of CI, and is therefore considered a
related party. CI has entered into transactions related to the advisory and distribution of its mutual funds with Scotiabank.
These transactions are in the normal course of operations and are recorded at the agreed upon exchange amounts. During
the three and 12 months ended December 31, 2012, CI incurred charges for deferred sales commissions of $1.0 million and
$4.9 million, respectively [three and 12 months ended December 31, 2011 – $1.0 million and $4.9 million, respectively] and
trailer fees of $5.1 million and $20.3 million, respectively [three and 12 months ended December 31, 2011 – $5.0 million and
$20.0 million, respectively] which were paid or payable to Scotiabank. The balance payable to Scotiabank as at December
31, 2012 of $1.7 million [December 31, 2011 – $1.7 million] is included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities.
SHARE CAPITAL
As at December 31, 2012, CI had 282,914,642 shares outstanding.
At December 31, 2012, 6.4 million options to purchase shares were outstanding, of which 2.4 million options were exercisable.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The table that follows summarizes CI’s contractual obligations at December 31, 2012.
PAYMENTS DUE BY YEAR
(millions of dollars)
Credit facility
Debentures
Operating leases
Total
44
1 year
or less
24.0
—
11.0
35.0
Total
96.0
500.0
104.9
700.9
2
3
4
5
5 years
More than
24.0
200.0
9.6
233.6
48.0
—
9.1
—
300.0
9.0
57.1
309.0
—
—
8.6
8.6
—
—
57.6
57.6
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The December 31, 2012 Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS. For a discussion of
all signifi cant accounting policies, refer to Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Included in the
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements is Note 3 which provides a discussion regarding the recoverable amount
of CI’s goodwill and intangible assets compared to its carrying value.
CI carries signifi cant goodwill and intangible assets on its balance sheet. CI uses valuation models that use estimates of
future market returns and sales and redemptions of investment products as the primary determinants of fair value. CI also
uses a valuation approach based on a multiple of assets under management and assets under administration for each of
CI’s operating segments. The multiple used by CI refl ects recent transactions and research reports by independent equity
research analysts. CI has renewed these key variables in light of the current economic climate. Estimates of sales and
redemptions are very likely to change as economic conditions either improve or deteriorate, whereas estimates of future
market returns are less likely to do so. The models are most sensitive to current levels of assets under management and
administration as well as estimates of future market returns. While these balances are not currently impaired, a decline
of 20% in the fair value of certain models may result in an impairment of goodwill or other intangibles recorded on the
statement of fi nancial position.
DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The Chief Executive Offi cer (“CEO”) and the Chief Financial Offi cer (“CFO”), together with management, are responsible for
the design of CI’s disclosure controls and procedures. Management has evaluated, with participation of the CEO and CFO, the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as at December 31, 2012. Based on this evaluation, the CEO and CFO
have concluded that they are reasonably assured these Disclosure Controls and Procedures were effective and that material
information relating to CI was made known to them within the time periods specifi ed under applicable securities legislation.
Management, under the supervision of the CEO and CFO, is responsible for the design and maintenance of adequate
internal controls over fi nancial reporting for the purposes of providing reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
fi nancial reporting and the preparation of fi nancial statements for external purposes in accordance with IFRS. However, due
to its inherent limitations, internal controls over fi nancial reporting can only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance
that the fi nancial statements are free of misstatements. The COSO framework was used to assist management, along with
the CEO and CFO, in the evaluation of these internal control systems. Management, under the direction of the CEO and
CFO, have concluded that the internal controls over fi nancial reporting are effective. Management used various tools to
evaluate internal controls over fi nancial reporting which included interaction with key control systems, review of policy and
procedure documentation, observation or reperformance of control procedures to evaluate the effectiveness of controls
and concluded that these controls are effective. For the year ended December 31, 2012, there have been no changes to the
internal controls over fi nancial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to affect, internal controls
over fi nancial reporting.
Additional information relating to CI, including the most recent audited fi nancial statements, management information circular and
annual information form are available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.
45
Consolidated
Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
CI Financial Corp.
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS
Management of CI Financial Corp. [“CI”] is responsible for the integrity and objectivity of the consolidated fi nancial
statements and all other information contained in this document. The consolidated fi nancial statements have been
prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards and are based on management’s best information
and judgment.
In fulfi lling its responsibilities, management has developed internal control systems and procedures designed to provide
reasonable assurance that CI’s assets are safeguarded, that transactions are executed in accordance with appropriate
authorization, and that accounting records may be relied upon to properly refl ect CI’s business transactions.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is composed of outside directors who meet periodically and independently
with management and the auditors to discuss CI’s fi nancial reporting and internal control. The Audit Committee reviews
the fi nancial information prepared by management and the results of the audit by the auditors prior to recommending the
consolidated fi nancial statements to the Board of Directors for approval. The external auditors have unrestricted access
to the Audit Committee.
Management recognizes its responsibility to conduct CI’s affairs in the best interests of its shareholders.
Stephen A. MacPhail
Chief Executive Offi cer
Douglas J. Jamieson
Chief Financial Offi cer
47
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT
TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF CI FINANCIAL CORP.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated fi nancial statements of CI Financial Corp. [“CI”], which comprise the
consolidated statements of fi nancial position as at December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the consolidated statements of income
and comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash fl ows for the years then ended, and a summary of
signifi cant accounting policies and other explanatory information.
Management’s responsibility for the consolidated fi nancial statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated fi nancial statements in
accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, and for such internal control as management determines
is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated fi nancial statements that are free from material misstatement,
whether due to fraud or error.
Auditors’ responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated fi nancial statements based on our audits. We conducted
our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we comply
with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated
fi nancial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated
fi nancial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditors’ judgment, including the assessment of the risks
of material misstatement of the consolidated fi nancial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk
assessments, the auditors consider internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the
consolidated fi nancial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. An audit also includes
evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated fi nancial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained in our audits is suffi cient and appropriate to provide a basis for our
audit opinion.
Opinion
In our opinion, the consolidated fi nancial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the fi nancial position of CI as at
December 31, 2012 and 2011, and its fi nancial performance and its cash fl ows for the years then ended in accordance with
International Financial Reporting Standards.
Toronto, Canada
February 14, 2013
48
Consolidated Statements
OF FINANCIAL POSITION
As at December 31
[in thousands of Canadian dollars]
ASSETS
Current
Cash and cash equivalents
Client and trust funds on deposit
Marketable securities
Accounts receivable and prepaid expenses
Total current assets
Capital assets, net [note 2]
Deferred sales commissions, net of accumulated
amortization of $492,856 [December 31, 2011 – $494,642]
Intangibles [note 3]
Other assets [note 4]
Total assets
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Provisions for other liabilities [note 6]
Dividends payable [note 8]
Client and trust funds payable
Income taxes payable [note 9]
Current portion of long-term debt [note 5]
Total current liabilities
Deferred lease inducement
Long-term debt [note 5]
Provisions for other liabilities [note 6]
Deferred income taxes [note 9]
Total liabilities
Shareholders’ equity
Share capital [note 7(a)]
Contributed surplus
Defi cit
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
Total shareholders’ equity
(see accompanying notes)
On behalf of the Board of Directors:
2012
$
24,137
127,712
66,155
70,597
288,601
2011
$
122,550
124,978
42,099
70,168
359,795
46,879
49,634
452,319
2,161,403
22,413
2,971,615
119,721
1,097
45,254
125,773
6,608
24,000
322,453
17,165
570,368
6,611
379,030
1,295,627
1,964,433
14,511
(303,126)
170
1,675,988
2,971,615
491,216
2,162,122
22,215
3,084,982
120,797
2,417
42,526
123,745
8,736
257,763
555,984
18,489
522,592
6,530
361,202
1,464,797
1,964,334
20,059
(362,377)
(1,831)
1,620,185
3,084,982
--------------------------------
William T. Holland
Director
--------------------------------
G. Raymond Chang
Director
49
Consolidated Statements
OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the years ended December 31
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]
REVENUE
Management fees
Administration fees
Redemption fees
Gain (loss) on sale of marketable securities
Other income [note 4]
EXPENSES
Selling, general and administrative
Trailer fees [note 14]
Investment dealer fees
Amortization of deferred sales commissions
Amortization of intangibles
Interest [note 5]
Other [note 4]
Income before income taxes
Provision for income taxes [note 9]
Current
Deferred
Net income for the year
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale fi nancial assets,
net of income taxes of $287 [2011 – $(449)]
Reversal of losses to net income on available-for-sale
fi nancial assets, net of income taxes of $19 [2011 – $125]
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
Comprehensive income
2012
$
2011
$
1,277,698
1,302,773
125,985
27,388
303
26,368
132,272
28,629
(489)
33,108
1,457,742
1,496,293
286,009
373,954
98,263
163,100
2,437
24,937
5,265
953,965
503,777
134,092
17,522
151,614
352,163
290,776
379,454
103,753
164,431
2,386
27,496
6,927
975,223
521,070
131,420
12,751
144,171
376,899
1,899
(2,656)
102
2,001
681
(1,975)
354,164
374,924
Basic and diluted earnings per share [note 7(c)]
$1.24
$1.31
(see accompanying notes)
50
Consolidated Statements
OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
For the years ended December 31
Share capital
Contributed
comprehensive
[note 7(a)]
surplus
Defi cit
income (loss)
Accumulated
other
[in thousands of Canadian dollars]
$
$
$
$
Total
$
Balance, December 31, 2011
1,964,334
20,059
(362,377)
(1,831)
1,620,185
Comprehensive income
Dividends declared [note 8]
Shares repurchased
Issuance of share capital on exercise of options
Compensation expense for equity-based plans
Change during the year
—
—
(9,534)
9,633
—
99
—
—
—
(9,434)
3,886
352,163
(271,912)
(21,000)
—
—
2,001
—
—
—
—
(5,548)
59,251
2,001
354,164
(271,912)
(30,534)
199
3,886
55,803
Balance, December 31, 2012
1,964,433
14,511
(303,126)
170
1,675,988
Balance, December 31, 2010
1,984,488
21,846
(440,404)
144
1,566,074
Comprehensive income
Dividends declared [note 8]
Shares repurchased
Issuance of share capital on exercise of options
and vesting of deferred equity units
Compensation expense for equity-based plans
Change during the year
Balance, December 31, 2011
(see accompanying notes)
—
—
(32,729)
12,575
—
(20,154)
1,964,334
—
—
—
(8,787)
7,000
(1,787)
20,059
376,899
(1,975)
374,924
(236,407)
(62,465)
—
—
78,027
(362,377)
—
—
—
—
(236,407)
(95,194)
3,788
7,000
(1,975)
54,111
(1,831)
1,620,185
51
Consolidated Statements
OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
[in thousands of Canadian dollars]
OPERATING ACTIVITIES (*)
Net income
Add (deduct) items not involving cash
Gain (loss) on sale of marketable securities
Equity-based compensation
Amortization of deferred sales commissions
Amortization of intangibles
Amortization and depreciation of other
Deferred income taxes
Cash provided by operating activities before changes
in operating assets and liabilities
Net change in non-cash working capital balances
Cash provided by operating activities
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of marketable securities
Proceeds on sale of marketable securities
Additions to capital assets
Deferred sales commissions paid
Decrease (increase) in other assets
Additions to intangibles
Cash used in investing activities
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Increase in long-term debt
Repayment of debentures
Repurchase of share capital
Issuance of share capital
Dividends paid to shareholders
Cash used in fi nancing activities
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents during the year
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
(*) Included in operating activities are the following:
Interest paid
Income taxes paid
(see accompanying notes)
52
2012
$
2011
$
352,163
376,899
(303)
3,886
163,100
2,437
9,328
17,522
548,133
(6,700)
541,433
(26,761)
5,315
(5,560)
(124,203)
(400)
(1,718)
489
7,000
164,431
2,386
10,773
12,751
574,729
(63,679)
511,050
(43,740)
32,082
(21,477)
(141,232)
7,745
(1,924)
(153,327)
(168,546)
63,000
(250,000)
(30,534)
199
(269,184)
(486,519)
(98,413)
122,550
24,137
25,101
136,165
9,092
(100,000)
(95,194)
3,812
(254,201)
(436,491)
(93,987)
216,537
122,550
27,507
213,326
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]
December 31, 2012 and 2011
CI Financial Corp. [“CI”] is incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario. CI’s primary business is the management
and distribution of a broad range of fi nancial products and services, including mutual funds, segregated funds, fi nancial
planning, insurance, investment advice, wealth management and estate and succession planning.
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
These consolidated fi nancial statements of CI have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting
Standards [“IFRS”] as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board [“IASB”].
These consolidated fi nancial statements were authorized for issuance by the Board of Directors of CI on February 14, 2013.
Basis of presentation
The consolidated fi nancial statements of CI have been prepared on a historical cost basis, except for certain fi nancial
instruments that have been measured at fair value. The consolidated fi nancial statements have been prepared on a going
concern basis. CI’s presentation currency is the Canadian dollar. The functional currency of CI and its subsidiaries is also
the Canadian dollar.
Basis of consolidation
The consolidated fi nancial statements include the accounts of CI, CI Investments Inc. [“CI Investments”] and Assante
Wealth Management (Canada) Ltd. [“AWM”] and their subsidiaries, which are entities over which CI has control. Control
exists when CI has the power, directly or indirectly, to govern the fi nancial and operating policies of an entity so as to
obtain benefi ts from its activities. Hereinafter, CI and its subsidiaries are referred to as CI.
Revenue recognition
Revenue is recognized to the extent that it is probable that economic benefi ts will fl ow to CI and the revenue can be
reliably measured. Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable. In addition to these
general principles, CI applies the following specifi c revenue recognition policies:
Management fees are based upon the net asset value of the funds managed by CI and are recognized on an accrual basis.
Administration fees and other income are recognized as services are provided under contractual arrangements.
Administration fees include commission revenue, which is recorded on a trade date basis and advisory fees, which are
recorded when the services related to the underlying engagements are completed.
Redemption fees payable by securityholders of deferred sales charge mutual funds, the sales commission of which was
fi nanced by CI, are recognized as revenue on the trade date of the redemption of the applicable mutual fund securities.
53
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]
December 31, 2012 and 2011
Financial instruments
Financial assets are classifi ed at fair value through profi t or loss [“FVPL”], available-for-sale [“AFS”] or loans and receivables.
Financial liabilities are classifi ed as FVPL or other.
Financial instruments are recognized initially at fair value. Transaction costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition
or issue of a fi nancial instrument classifi ed as other than at FVPL are added to the carrying amount of the asset or liability.
The fair value of fi nancial instruments is generally determined by reference to quoted market bid prices where an active
market exists. Where there is no active market, the fair value is determined using valuation techniques.
Financial instruments classifi ed as FVPL are carried at fair value in the statement of fi nancial position and any gains or
losses are recorded in net income in the period in which they arise. Financial instruments classifi ed as FVPL include cash
and cash equivalents as well as an amount included in accounts payable and other liabilities.
Financial assets classifi ed as AFS are carried at fair value in the statement of fi nancial position. Movements in the fair
value are recorded in other comprehensive income until disposed, at which time the cumulative amount recorded in
comprehensive income is recognized in net income. Where there is objective evidence that an AFS asset is impaired, the
cumulative impairment loss is reclassifi ed from other comprehensive income to net income with subsequent movements
also recognized in net income. Financial assets classifi ed as AFS include marketable securities.
Loans and receivables and other fi nancial liabilities are recognized at amortized cost using the effective interest rate
method. Such accounts include client and trust funds on deposits, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued
liabilities, dividends payable, client and trust funds payable and long-term debt.
All fi nancial instruments recognized at fair value in the consolidated statement of fi nancial position are classifi ed into
three fair value hierarchy levels as follows:
Level 1 – valuation based on quoted prices (unadjusted) observed in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 – valuation techniques based on inputs that are quoted prices of similar instruments in active markets; quoted
prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices used in a valuation
model that are observable for that instrument; and inputs that are derived from or corroborated by observable market
data by correlation or other means.
Level 3 – valuation techniques with signifi cant unobservable market inputs.
54
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]
December 31, 2012 and 2011
Derivatives and hedging
CI may enter into interest rate swap agreements to reduce its exposure to interest rate risk on its long-term debt. CI
does not enter into derivative fi nancial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. At the inception of the swap
agreement, CI formally documents the hedging relationship, detailing the risk management objective and the hedging
strategy of the hedge. The documentation specifi es the asset, liability or cash fl ows being hedged, the related hedging
item, the nature of the specifi c risk exposure or exposures being hedged, the intended term of the hedging relationship,
the method for assessing the effectiveness of the hedging relationship, and the method for measuring the ineffectiveness
of the hedging relationship. Derivative fi nancial instruments that have been designated and qualify for hedge accounting
are classifi ed as either cash fl ow or fair value hedges.
Changes in the fair value of the interest rate swaps are recognized in the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive
income as other income. Similarly, changes in the fair value of the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk are also
recognized in the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive income as other income, with a corresponding
adjustment to the long-term debt in the consolidated statement of fi nancial position. Hedge accounting is discontinued
prospectively if the hedging relationship no longer qualifi es as an effective hedge or if the hedging item is settled. The
hedged item is no longer adjusted to refl ect changes in fair value. Amounts previously recorded as cumulative adjustments
to the effective portion of gains and losses attributable to the hedged risk are amortized using the effective interest rate
method and recognized in the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive income over the remaining useful life
of the hedged item. Hedge accounting is also discontinued if the hedged item is sold or terminated before maturity. In such
a situation, the cumulative adjustments with respect to the effective portion of gains and losses attributable to the hedged
risk are immediately recorded in the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive income.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on deposit, highly liquid investments and interest bearing deposits with original
maturities of 90 days or less.
Client and trust funds
Client and trust funds on deposit include amounts representing cash held in trust with Canadian fi nancial institutions for
clients in respect of self-administered Registered Retirement Savings Plans and Registered Retirement Income Funds, and
amounts received from clients for which the settlement date on the purchase of securities has not occurred or accounts
in which the clients maintain a cash balance. Client and trust funds on deposit also include amounts for client transactions
that are entered into on either a cash or margin basis and recorded on the trade date of the transaction. Amounts are
due from clients on the settlement date of the transaction for cash accounts. For margin accounts, CI extends credit to
a client for the purchase of securities, collateralized by the fi nancial instruments in the client’s account. Amounts loaned
are limited by margin regulations of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada [“IIROC”] and other
regulatory authorities, and are subject to CI’s credit review and daily monitoring procedures. The corresponding liabilities
related to the above accounts and transactions are included in client and trust funds payable.
55
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]
December 31, 2012 and 2011
Marketable securities
Marketable securities consist of investments in mutual fund securities and publicly traded companies. Marketable securities
are measured at fair value and recognized on trade date. Mutual fund securities are valued using the net asset value per
unit of each fund. The fair value of publicly traded companies is determined using quoted market prices. Realized and
unrealized gains and losses are recognized using average cost. Except for impairment losses, gains and losses in the fair value
of marketable securities are recorded as other comprehensive income (loss) until disposed of, at which time any gain or loss is
recorded in net income. When a decline in fair value is other than temporary and there is objective evidence of impairment,
the cumulative loss that had been recognized directly in other comprehensive income (loss) is removed and recognized in net
income, even though the fi nancial asset has not been derecognized. Distributions from mutual fund securities are recorded
as other income. Distributions that are reinvested increase the cost base of the marketable securities.
Capital assets
Capital assets are recorded at cost less accumulated amortization. These assets are amortized over their estimated useful
lives as follows:
Computer hardware
Offi ce equipment
Straight-line over three years
Straight-line over fi ve years
Leasehold improvements
Straight-line over the term of the lease
Deferred sales commissions
Commissions paid on sales of deferred sales charge mutual funds represent commissions paid by CI to brokers and dealers,
and are recorded on the trade date of the sale of the applicable mutual fund product. Deferred sales commissions are
amortized over the expected investment period of 24 to 84 months on a straight-line basis from the date recorded.
When redemptions occur, the actual investment period is shorter than expected, and the unamortized deferred
sales commission related to the original investment in the mutual funds is charged to net income and included in the
amortization of deferred sales commissions.
Intangible assets
Fund contracts
Fund administration contracts and fund management contracts [collectively, “fund contracts”] are recorded net of any
write-down for impairment. CI evaluates the carrying amounts of fund contracts for potential impairment by comparing the
recoverable amount with their carrying amounts. These evaluations are performed on an annual basis or more frequently
if events or changes in circumstances indicate a potential impairment. Any impairment would be written off to income.
56
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]
December 31, 2012 and 2011
Fund administration contracts are amortized on a straight-line basis over 25 years. Fund management contracts with a
fi nite life are amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of up to 20 years, depending on the contractual terms of
such agreements and management’s best estimate of their useful lives. Fund management contracts with an indefi nite
life are not amortized.
Goodwill
Goodwill is recorded as the excess of purchase price over identifi able assets acquired. Following initial recognition,
goodwill is stated at cost less any accumulated impairment losses. Goodwill is evaluated for impairment at least annually
and any impairment is recognized immediately in income and not subsequently reversed. Goodwill is allocated to the
appropriate cash-generating unit for the purpose of impairment testing.
Other intangibles
Other intangibles include the costs of trademarks and computer software, capitalized where it is probable that future
economic benefi ts that are attributable to the assets will fl ow to CI and the cost of the assets can be measured reliably.
Computer software is recorded initially at cost and amortized over its expected useful life of two to ten years on a
straight-line basis. Trademarks have an indefi nite life and are not amortized.
Equity-based compensation
CI uses the fair value method to account for equity-settled employee incentive share options. The value of the equity-
based compensation, as at the date of grant, is recognized over the applicable vesting period as compensation expense
with a corresponding increase in contributed surplus. When options are exercised, the proceeds received, together with
the amount in contributed surplus, are credited to share capital.
The amount recognized as an expense is adjusted to refl ect the number of awards for which the related service conditions
are expected to be met, such that the amount ultimately recognized as an expense is based on the number of awards that
do meet the related service condition at the vesting date.
Deferred lease inducements
Lease inducements are deferred and amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.
Income taxes
Current income tax liabilities are measured at the amount expected to be paid to tax authorities, net of recoveries based
on the tax rates and laws enacted or substantively enacted at the statement of fi nancial position date.
57
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]
December 31, 2012 and 2011
The liability method of tax allocation is used in accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred income tax
assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the carrying amount and tax basis of assets and
liabilities and measured using the substantively enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences
are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are recognized to the extent that it is probable that taxable profi ts will be
available against which deductible temporary differences can be utilized. Deferred tax liabilities are generally recognized
for all taxable temporary differences.
Deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences arising in investments in subsidiaries and joint
ventures except where the reversal of the temporary difference can be controlled and it is probable that the difference
will not reverse in the foreseeable future. Deferred tax liabilities are not recognized on temporary differences that arise
from the initial recognition of goodwill which is not deductible for tax purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
not recognized in respect of temporary differences that arise on initial recognition of assets and liabilities acquired other
than in a business combination.
Provisions for other liabilities
A provision for other liabilities is recognized if, as a result of a past event, CI has a present legal or constructive obligation
that can be estimated reliably, and it is probable that an outfl ow of economic benefi ts will be required to settle the
obligation. In the event that the time value of money is material, provisions are determined by discounting the expected
future cash fl ows at a pre-tax rate that refl ects a current market assessment of the time value of money and the risks
specifi c to the liability.
Foreign currency translation
Monetary assets and liabilities are translated into Canadian dollars using the exchange rates in effect at the statement
of fi nancial position date. Non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated into Canadian dollars using historical
exchange rates. Revenue and expenses are translated at average rates prevailing during the month. Other foreign currency
transactions are translated into Canadian dollars using the exchange rate in effect on the transaction date. Translation
exchange gains and losses are included in other income in the month in which they occur.
58
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]
December 31, 2012 and 2011
Critical accounting estimates and judgements
In the process of applying CI’s accounting policies, management has made signifi cant judgements involving estimates and
assumptions which are summarized as follows:
(i) Impairment of intangible assets
Indefi nite life intangible assets, including goodwill, are tested for impairment annually or more frequently if changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may be impaired. The values associated with intangibles involve estimates
and assumptions, including those with respect to future cash infl ows and outfl ows, discount rates and asset lives. These
estimates require signifi cant judgement regarding market growth rates, fund fl ow assumptions, expected margins and
costs which could affect CI’s future results if the current estimates of future performance and fair values change. These
determinations also affect the amount of amortization expense on fund contracts with fi nite lives recognized in future
periods.
(ii) Deferred tax assets
Deferred tax assets are recognized for unused tax losses to the extent that it is probable that taxable profi ts will be
available against which the losses can be utilized. Signifi cant management judgement is required to determine the amount
of deferred tax assets that can be recognized, based upon the likely timing and level of future taxable profi ts together
with future tax planning strategies.
(iii) Provisions for other liabilities
Due to the nature of provisions, a considerable part of their determination is based on estimates and judgements,
including assumptions concerning the future. The actual outcome of these uncertain factors may be materially different
from the estimates, causing differences with the estimated provisions. Further details are provided in Note 6.
(iv) Share-based payments
The cost of employee services received (compensation expense) in exchange for awards of equity instruments recognized
is estimated using a Black-Scholes option valuation model which requires the use of assumptions. Further details regarding
the assumptions used in the option pricing model are provided in Note 7 [b].
59
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]
December 31, 2012 and 2011
2. CAPITAL ASSETS
Capital assets consist of the following:
Cost
Balance, December 31, 2010
Additions
Retired
Balance, December 31, 2011
Additions
Retired
Computer
Offi ce
Leasehold
hardware
equipment
improvements
$
$
$
18,872
4,371
(11,444)
11,799
607
(751)
12,401
1,880
(4,888)
9,393
791
(6)
Balance, December 31, 2012
11,655
10,178
Accumulated depreciation
Balance, December 31, 2010
Depreciation
Retired
Balance, December 31, 2011
Depreciation
Retired
Balance, December 31, 2012
Carrying amounts
At December 31, 2010
At December 31, 2011
At December 31, 2012
15,893
2,805
(11,444)
7,254
2,500
(751)
9,003
2,979
4,545
2,652
8,816
1,177
(4,888)
5,105
1,239
(6)
6,338
3,585
4,288
3,840
60
Total
$
79,341
21,477
(26,164)
74,654
5,560
(757)
79,457
41,408
9,776
(26,164)
25,020
8,315
(757)
32,578
37,933
49,634
46,879
48,068
15,226
(9,832)
53,462
4,162
—
57,624
16,699
5,794
(9,832)
12,661
4,576
—
17,237
31,369
40,801
40,387
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]
December 31, 2012 and 2011
3. INTANGIBLES
Intangible assets consist of the following:
Fund
Fund
Fund
management management
administration
contracts
contracts
Other
Goodwill
contracts
fi nite life
indefi nite life
intangibles
$
$
$
$
$
Total
$
Cost
Balance, December 31, 2010
1,119,926
37,600
27,500
999,082
20,422
2,204,530
Additions
—
—
—
—
1,924
1,924
Balance, December 31, 2011
1,119,926
37,600
27,500
999,082
22,346
2,206,454
Additions
—
—
—
—
1,718
1,718
Balance, December 31, 2012
1,119,926
37,600
27,500
999,082
24,064
2,208,172
Accumulated amortization
Balance, December 31, 2010
Amortization
Balance, December 31, 2011
Amortization
Balance, December 31, 2012
Carrying amounts
At December 31, 2010
At December 31, 2011
At December 31, 2012
Remaining term
—
—
—
—
—
1,119,926
1,119,926
1,119,926
10,552
1,504
12,056
1,504
13,560
27,048
25,544
24,040
14,906
775
15,681
775
16,456
12,594
11,819
11,044
N/A 15.9 – 16.4 yrs
14.3 yrs
—
—
—
—
—
999,082
999,082
999,082
N/A
41,946
2,386
44,332
2,437
46,769
2,162,584
2,162,122
2,161,403
16,488
107
16,595
158
16,753
3,934
5,751
7,311
N/A
61
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]
December 31, 2012 and 2011
(a) Cash-generating units
CI has two cash-generating units [“CGU”] for the purpose of assessing the carrying amount of the allocated goodwill
and intangible assets, being the asset management and asset administration operating segments as described in Note 15.
(b) Impairment testing of goodwill
As at December 31, 2012 and 2011, CI has allocated goodwill of $927,344 and $192,582 to the asset management and asset
administration operating segments, respectively. The recoverable amount of goodwill for the asset management and
asset administration operating segments as at December 31, 2012 and 2011 has been determined based on a fair value less
costs to sell calculation, using a valuation multiple applied to assets under management and assets under administration,
respectively. This methodology is commonly used in the marketplace by independent equity research analysts.
The calculation of the recoverable amounts exceeds the carrying amounts of both the asset management and the asset
administration operating segments, including goodwill. Recent equity market performance, recent market transactions
and CI’s current market capitalization provide additional evidence that the recoverable amount of these operating
segments is in excess of the carrying amounts.
(c) Impairment testing of fund contracts
As at December 31, 2012 and 2011, CI had indefi nite life fund management contracts within the asset management CGU
of $999,082. These are contracts for the management of open end funds which have no expiry or termination provisions.
The fair value of indefi nite life intangibles within the asset management operating segment as at December 31, 2012 and
2011 has been determined based on a value in use calculation, using 10 year forecasts and a terminal value for the period
thereafter. The key assumptions used in the forecast calculation include assumptions on market appreciation, net sales of
funds and operating margins. The terminal value has been calculated assuming a long-term growth rate of 2% per annum
in perpetuity [December 31, 2011 - 2%], based on a long-term real GDP growth rate. A discount rate of 7.25% per annum
[December 31, 2011 - 8.05%] has been applied to the recoverable calculation.
The calculation of the recoverable amount exceeds the carrying amount of indefi nite life management contracts as at
December 31, 2012 and 2011. Recent equity market performance provides additional evidence that the recoverable amount
of indefi nite life intangibles is in excess of the carrying amount.
62
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]
December 31, 2012 and 2011
4. OTHER ASSETS, INCOME AND EXPENSE
Other assets consists mainly of an investment in a limited partnership, long-term accounts receivable, deferred charges
and loans advanced to employees, shareholders and investment advisors.
CI has an employee share purchase loan program for key employees. These loans are renewable yearly and bear interest
at prescribed rates. As at December 31, 2012, the carrying amount of employee share purchase loans is $9,162 [December
31, 2011 - $10,450] and is included in other assets. These loans become due immediately upon termination of employment
or sale of the shares that are held as collateral. As at December 31, 2012, the shares held as collateral have a market value
of approximately $16,651 [December 31, 2011 - $16,941].
Other assets include shareholder loans in the amount of $3,054 as at December 31, 2012 [December 31, 2011 - $3,185] issued
primarily to investment advisors. These amounts are secured primarily by common shares of CI that are held as collateral.
These loans become due immediately either on termination of the advisor relationship or upon the sale of CI shares that
are held as collateral. As at December 31, 2012, the shares held as collateral have a market value of approximately $3,769
[December 31, 2011 - $3,190].
CI has a hiring and retention incentive program whereby loans are extended to current investment advisors. These
loans are initially recorded at their fair value, may bear interest at prescribed rates and are contractually forgiven on a
straight-line basis over the applicable contractual period, which varies in length from three to seven years. CI utilizes the
effective interest rate method to amortize the forgiven amount. The forgiven amount is included in selling, general and
administrative expenses. As at December 31, 2012, loans to investment advisors of $3,670 [December 31, 2011 - $1,576] are
included in other assets. These loans become due on demand upon termination or breach in the terms of the agreements.
Other income consists mainly of fees received for the administration of third party mutual funds, custody fees, equity
income, foreign exchange gains (losses) and interest income. Other expenses consist mainly of distribution fees to limited
partnerships, legal settlements, amortization of debenture transaction costs and capital taxes.
63
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]
December 31, 2012 and 2011
5. LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt consists of the following:
Credit facility
Bankers’ acceptances
Prime rate loan
Debentures
$250 million, 3.30%, due December 17, 2012
$200 million, 4.19%, due December 16, 2014
$300 million, 3.94% until December 13, 2015 and
fl oating rate until December 14, 2016
Long-term debt
Current portion of long-term debt
As at
As at
December 31, 2012
December 31, 2011
$
$
88,000
8,000
96,000
—
199,536
298,832
498,368
594,368
24,000
26,000
7,000
33,000
249,514
199,258
298,583
747,355
780,355
257,763
Credit facility
Effective March 1, 2012, CI renewed its revolving credit facility with two chartered banks and on May 11, 2012 increased the
amount that may be borrowed under the credit facility to $250 million. Amounts may be borrowed under the facility in
Canadian dollars through prime rate loans, which bear interest at the greater of the bank’s prime rate and the Canadian
Deposit Offering Rate plus 1.00%, or bankers’ acceptances, which bear interest at bankers’ acceptance rates plus 0.75%.
Amounts may also be borrowed in U.S. dollars through base rate loans, which bear interest at the greater of the bank’s
reference rate for loans made by it in Canada in U.S. funds and the federal funds effective rate plus 1.00%, or LIBOR loans
which bear interest at LIBOR plus 0.75%.
CI may also borrow under this facility in the form of letters of credit, which bear a fee of 0.75% on any undrawn portion.
As at December 31, 2012 and 2011, CI had not accessed the facility by way of letters of credit.
64
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]
December 31, 2012 and 2011
Loans are made by the bank under a 364-day revolving credit facility, the term of which may be extended annually at the
bank’s option. If the bank elects not to extend the term, 50% of the outstanding principal amount shall be repaid in equal
quarterly instalments over the following two years, with the remaining 50% of the outstanding principal balance due two
years following the fi rst quarter-end payment.
The credit facility is fully and unconditionally guaranteed by CI Investments, a wholly owned subsidiary of CI, and may be
guaranteed by certain other subsidiaries of CI. The credit facility contains a number of fi nancial covenants that require CI
to meet certain fi nancial ratios and fi nancial condition tests. CI is within its fi nancial covenants with respect to its credit
facility, which require that the funded debt to annualized earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
ratio remain below 2.5:1 and that CI’s assets under management not fall below $40 billion, calculated based on a rolling
30-day average. There can be no assurance that future borrowings or equity fi nancing will be available to CI or available
on acceptable terms.
Debentures
On December 17, 2012, CI repaid $250 million of debentures [the “2012 Debentures”] and on December 16, 2011, CI repaid
$100 million of fl oating rate debentures [the “Floating Rate Debentures”].
On December 16, 2009, CI entered into interest rate swap agreements with a Canadian chartered bank to swap the semi-
annual fi xed rate payments on the $250 million 2012 Debentures and the $200 million debentures due December 16, 2014
[the “2014 Debentures”] for fl oating rate payments. Based on the terms of the agreements, CI pays a rate equivalent to the
three-month Canadian bankers’ acceptance rate plus a spread of 142.4 basis points on the 2012 Debentures and a spread of
157.6 basis points on the 2014 Debentures. The rates are reset quarterly and paid semi-annually to match the fi xed payment
obligations of the Debentures. The swap agreements terminate on the maturity date of the respective Debentures unless
terminated by CI at an earlier date. The swap agreement on the 2012 Debentures terminated on the maturity date of
December 17, 2012. As at December 31, 2012, the fair value of the interest rate swap agreements was an unrealized gain of
$4,787 [December 31, 2011 - unrealized gain of $9,899] and is included in long-term debt in the consolidated statements of
fi nancial position.
For the year ended December 31, 2012, interest expense attributable to the 2012 Debentures, the 2014 Debentures and the
2016 Debentures was $6,553, $5,722 and $11,820, respectively [2011 - $6,799, $5,740 and $11,885, respectively]. Interest on
the Floating Rate Debentures was paid at the average three-month bankers’ acceptance rate plus 1.20%. Interest expense
attributable to the Floating Rate Debentures was $2,385 for the year ended December 31, 2011.
Issuance costs and the issuance discount are amortized over the term of the Debentures using the effective interest rate
method. The amortization expense related to the discount and transaction costs for CI’s issued Debentures for the year
ended December 31, 2012 were $1,013 [2011 - $998] which is included in other expenses.
65
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]
December 31, 2012 and 2011
CI may, at its option, redeem the 2014 Debentures, and CI Investments may, at its option, redeem the 2016 Debentures, in
whole or in part, from time to time, on not less than 30 nor more than 60 days’ prior notice to the registered holder, at a
redemption price which is equal to the greater of par or the Government of Canada Yield, plus 41 basis points in the case
of the 2014 Debentures and 37.5 basis points in the case of the 2016 Debentures. CI considers this embedded prepayment
option to be closely related to the Debentures and, as such, does not account for it separately as a derivative.
In the event that both a change of control occurs and the rating of the Debentures is lowered to below investment grade,
defi ned as below BBB- by Standard and Poors and BBB (low) by DBRS Limited, CI will be required to make an offer to
repurchase all or, at the option of each holder, any part of each holder’s Debentures at a purchase price payable in cash
equivalent to 101% of the outstanding principal amount of the Debentures together with accrued and unpaid interest, to
the date of purchase.
The 2014 Debentures are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by CI Investments and may be guaranteed by certain other
subsidiaries of CI. The 2016 Debentures are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by CI.
6. PROVISION FOR OTHER LIABILITIES AND CONTINGENCIES
CI is a party to a number of claims, proceedings and investigations, including legal, regulatory and tax, in the ordinary
course of its business. Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in these matters, it is diffi cult to predict the fi nal outcome
or the amount and timing of any outfl ow related to such matters. Based on current information and consultations with
advisors, CI does not expect the outcome of these matters, individually or in aggregate, to have a material adverse effect
on its fi nancial position or on its ability to continue normal business operations.
CI has made provisions based on current information and the probable resolution of any such claims, proceedings and
investigations. The movement in amounts provided for contingent liabilities and related expenses during the years ended
December 31, are as follows:
Provision for other liabilities, beginning of year
Additions
Amounts used
Unused amounts reversed
Provision for other liabilities, end of year
Current portion of provision for other liabilities
66
2012
$
8,947
1,659
(2,319)
(579)
7,708
1,097
2011
$
11,428
1,417
(1,597)
(2,301)
8,947
2,417
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]
December 31, 2012 and 2011
CI maintains insurance policies that may provide coverage against certain claims. Amounts receivable under these policies
are not accrued for unless the realization of income is virtually certain. During the year ended December 31, 2011, CI
received insurance proceeds of $16,004 related to the settlement of legal claims for 2011 and prior years [2012 – nil]. At
December 31, 2012, CI has accrued $475 for amounts to be received under insurance policies [2011 - $40], which is included
in accounts receivable.
Litigation
CI is a defendant to two class action lawsuits related to events and transactions that gave rise to a settlement agreement
with the Ontario Securities Commission in 2004. Although CI continues to believe that this settlement fully compensated
investors affected by frequent trading activity, a provision has been made based on the probable resolution of these
claims and related expenses.
Taxation
CI is subject to various uncertainties concerning the interpretation and application of Canadian tax laws. If tax authorities
disagree with CI’s application of such tax laws, CI’s profi tability and cash fl ows could be adversely affected. CI Investments
is considered a large case fi le by the Canada Revenue Agency, and as such, is subject to audit each year. There is a
signifi cant lag between the end of a fi scal year and when such audits are completed. Therefore, at any given time, several
years may be open for audit and/or adjustment.
67
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]
December 31, 2012 and 2011
7. SHARE CAPITAL
A summary of the changes to CI’s share capital is as follows:
[A] AUTHORIZED AND ISSUED
Common Shares
Authorized
An unlimited number of common shares of CI
Issued
Number of shares
Stated value
[in thousands]
$
Common shares, balance, December 31, 2010
287,434
1,984,488
Issuance of share capital on vesting of deferred equity units
and exercise of share options
Share repurchase
Common shares, balance, December 31, 2011
Issuance of share capital on exercise of share options
Share repurchase
Common shares, balance, December 31, 2012
863
(4,730)
283,567
722
(1,374)
282,915
12,575
(32,729)
1,964,334
9,633
(9,534)
1,964,433
During the year ended December 31, 2012, 1,374,300 shares [2011 - 4,729,800 shares] were repurchased under a normal
course issuer bid at an average cost of $22.22 per share [2011 - $20.13 per share] for total consideration of $30,534
[2011 - $95,194]. Defi cit was increased by $21,000 [2011 - $62,465] for the cost of the shares repurchased in excess of their
stated value.
[B] EMPLOYEE INCENTIVE SHARE OPTION PLAN
CI has an employee incentive share option plan [the “Share Option Plan”], as amended and restated, for the executives
and key employees of CI.
68
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]
December 31, 2012 and 2011
During the year, CI granted 2,232,412 options [2011 - 1,577,170 options] to employees. The fair value method of accounting is
used for the valuation of the 2012 and 2011 share option grants. Compensation expense is recognized over the three-year
vesting period, assuming an estimated forfeiture rate of 0% to 1.4%, [options issued 2011 – 0% to 1%], with an offset to
contributed surplus. When exercised, amounts originally recorded against contributed surplus as well as any consideration
paid by the option holder is credited to share capital. The fair value of the 2012 and 2011 option grants was estimated using
the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
Year of grant
# of options grants [in thousands]
2012
243
2012
1,989
2011
370
2011
1,207
Dividend yield
4.892% – 5.257%
4.837% – 5.197%
4.514% – 4.833%
4.702% – 5.035%
Expected volatility (*)
18%
18%
20%
20%
Risk-free interest rate
1.335% – 1.439%
1.374% – 1.528%
2.276% – 2.637%
2.202% – 2.592%
Expected life [years]
Forfeiture rate
2.7 – 4.0
0%
2.7 – 4.0
1.4%
3.0 – 4.2
0%
3.0 – 4.2
1%
Fair value per stock option
$1.81 – $2.01
$1.84 – $2.06
$2.40 – $2.71
$2.26 – $2.54
Exercise price
$21.73
$21.98
$22.45
$21.55
(*) Based on the historical volatility of CI’s share price
The maximum number of shares that may be issued under the Share Option Plan is 14,000,000 shares. As at December 31,
2012, there are 6,363,963 shares [2011 - 6,018,092 shares] reserved for issuance on exercise of share options. These options
vest over periods of up to fi ve years, may be exercised at prices ranging from $11.60 to $22.45 per share and expire at dates
up to 2017.
69
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]
December 31, 2012 and 2011
A summary of the changes in the Share Option Plan is as follows:
Options outstanding, December 31, 2010
Options exercisable, December 31, 2010
Options granted
Options exercised (*)
Options cancelled
Options outstanding, December 31, 2011
Options exercisable, December 31, 2011
Options granted
Options exercised (*)
Options cancelled
Options outstanding, December 31, 2012
Options exercisable, December 31, 2012
Number of options
exercise price
Weighted average
[in thousands]
6,270
727
1,577
(1,665)
(164)
6,018
1,585
2,232
(1,777)
(109)
6,364
2,418
$
15.50
13.52
21.76
12.90
18.02
17.80
15.96
21.95
13.32
21.05
20.45
18.34
(*) Weighted-average share price of options exercised was $22.15 during the year 2012 [2011 – $21.68]
The equity-based compensation expense under the Share Option Plan for the year ended December 31, 2012 of $3,886
[2011 - $7,000] has been included in selling, general and administrative expenses.
70
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]
December 31, 2012 and 2011
Options outstanding and exercisable as at December 31, 2012 are as follows:
Exercise price
options outstanding
remaining contractual life
options exercisable
Number of
Weighted average
Number of
$
11.60
12.57
15.59
18.20
19.48
21.27
21.55
21.73
21.98
22.45
11.60 to 22.45
[in thousands]
[years]
[in thousands]
503
153
120
135
89
1,714
1,081
243
1,956
370
6,364
1.2
0.9
1.3
1.4
2.4
2.2
3.1
4.4
4.1
3.2
2.9
503
153
120
135
24
1,029
331
––
––
123
2,418
71
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]
December 31, 2012 and 2011
[C] BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per common share for the years ended
December 31:
[in thousands]
Numerator:
2012
2011
Net income – basic and diluted
$352,163
$376,899
Denominator:
Weighted average number of common shares – basic
Weighted average effect of dilutive stock options (*)
Weighted average number of common shares – diluted
Net earnings per common share
Basic
Diluted
283,390
640
284,030
$1.24
$1.24
286,998
1,202
288,200
$1.31
$1.31
(*) The determination of the weighted average number of common shares – diluted excludes nil shares related to stock options that
were anti-dilutive for the year ended December 31, 2012 [and 3,393 thousand shares for the year ended December 31, 2011].
[D] MAXIMUM SHARE DILUTION
The following table presents the maximum number of shares that would be outstanding if all the outstanding options as
at January 31, 2013 were exercised and outstanding:
[in thousands]
Shares outstanding at January 31, 2013
Options to purchase shares
283,193
5,029
288,222
72
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]
December 31, 2012 and 2011
8. DIVIDENDS
The following dividends were paid by CI during the year ended December 31, 2012:
Record date
Payment date
December 31, 2011
January 31, 2012
February 29, 2012
March 31, 2012
April 30, 2012
May 31, 2012
June 30, 2012
July 31, 2012
August 31, 2012
September 30, 2012
October 31, 2012
November 30, 2012
Paid during the year ended December 31, 2012
January 13, 2012
February 15, 2012
March 15, 2012
April 13, 2012
May 15, 2012
June 15, 2012
July 13, 2012
August 15, 2012
September 14, 2012
October 15, 2012
November 15, 2012
December 14, 2012
Cash dividend
Total dividend
per share
$
0.075
0.075
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
amount
$
21,220
21,274
22,703
22,698
22,705
22,666
22,667
22,668
22,647
22,648
22,646
22,642
269,184
The following dividends were declared but not paid by CI during the year ended December 31, 2012:
Record date
December 31, 2012
January 31, 2013
Declared and accrued as at December 31, 2012
Cash dividend
Total dividend
Payment date
January 15, 2013
February 15, 2013
per share
$
0.08
0.08
amount
$
22,627
22,627
45,254
73
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]
December 31, 2012 and 2011
The following dividends were paid by CI during the year ended December 31, 2011:
Cash dividend
Total dividend
Record date
Payment date
December 31, 2010
January 31, 2011
February 28, 2011
March 31, 2011
April 30, 2011
May 31, 2011
June 30, 2011
July 31, 2011
August 31, 2012
September 30, 2012
October 31, 2012
November 30, 2012
January 14, 2011
February 15, 2011
March 15, 2011
April 15, 2011
May 13, 2011
June 15, 2011
July 15, 2011
August 15, 2011
September 15, 2012
October 14, 2012
November 15, 2012
December 15, 2012
per share
$
0.07
0.07
0.07
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
Paid during the year ended December 31, 2011
The following dividends were declared but not paid by CI during the year ended December 31, 2011:
amount
$
20,146
20,179
20,183
21,615
21,620
21,632
21,634
21,501
21,569
21,500
21,324
21,298
254,201
Record date
Payment date
per share $
dividend amount $
Cash dividend
Total
December 31, 2011
January 31, 2012
Declared and accrued as at December 31, 2011
January 13, 2012
February 15, 2012
0.075
0.075
21,263
21,263
42,526
74
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]
December 31, 2012 and 2011
9. INCOME TAXES
[a] The following are the major components of income tax expense for the years ended December 31:
Statement of Income
Current income tax expense
Based on taxable income of the current year
Adjustments in respect of prior years
Deferred income tax expense
Origination and reversal of temporary differences
Other
Income tax expense reported in the statement of income
Statement of Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Deferred income taxes
Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale fi nancial assets
Reversal of losses to net income on available-for-sale fi nancial assets
Income tax expense (recovery) reported in other comprehensive income (loss)
2012
$
136,653
(2,561)
134,092
17,417
105
17,522
151,614
287
19
306
2011
$
132,387
(967)
131,420
12,203
548
12,751
144,171
(449)
125
(324)
[b] The following is a reconciliation between CI’s statutory and effective income tax rates for the years ended December 31:
Combined Canadian federal and provincial income tax rate
Increase (decrease) in income taxes resulting from
Impact of rate changes on deferred income taxes
Recovery of prior years’ provisions for settled tax items
Other, net
2012
%
26.5
3.6
(0.5)
0.5
30.1
2011
%
28.2
(1.0)
0.4
0.1
27.7
75
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]
December 31, 2012 and 2011
[c] Deferred income taxes refl ect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for fi nancial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Signifi cant components of CI’s
deferred income tax liabilities and assets are as follows at December 31, 2012:
Recognized
in other
As at
Recognized in
comprehensive
As at
December 31, 2011
net income
income (loss) December 31, 2012
$
$
261,732
122,854
384,586
6,104
8,140
2,174
6,966
23,384
361,202
12,885
(5,135)
7,750
(5,070)
(3,222)
(305)
(1,175)
(9,772)
17,522
$
—
—
—
—
—
—
(306)
(306)
306
$
274,617
117,719
392,336
1,034
4,918
1,869
5,485
13,306
379,030
Deferred income tax liabilities
Fund contracts
Deferred sales commissions
Total deferred income tax liabilities
Deferred income tax assets
Equity-based compensation
Non-capital loss carryforwards
Provisions for other liabilities
Other
Total deferred income tax assets
Net deferred income tax liabilities
76
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]
December 31, 2012 and 2011
Signifi cant components of CI’s deferred income tax liabilities and assets are as follows at December 31, 2011:
Recognized
in other
As at
Recognized in
comprehensive
As at
December 31, 2010
net income
income (loss) December 31, 2011
$
$
264,831
132,874
397,705
6,576
32,652
2,609
7,093
48,930
348,775
(3,099)
(10,020)
(13,119)
(472)
(24,512)
(435)
(451)
(25,870)
12,751
$
—
—
—
—
—
—
324
324
(324)
$
261,732
122,854
384,586
6,104
8,140
2,174
6,966
23,384
361,202
Deferred income tax liabilities
Fund contracts
Deferred sales commissions
Total deferred income tax liabilities
Deferred income tax assets
Equity-based compensation
Non-capital loss carryforwards
Provisions for other liabilities
Other
Total deferred income tax assets
Net deferred income tax liabilities
The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon future taxable profi ts during the periods in which
those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the expected reversal of deferred tax liabilities
and projected future taxable income in making this assessment. Based upon the level of historical taxable income and
projections for future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, management
believes it is probable that CI will realize the benefi ts of these deductible differences.
10. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Financial assets are classifi ed into three categories, FVPL, loans and receivables and available-for sale. As at December 31, 2012,
FVPL assets include cash and cash equivalents carried at fair value and classifi ed as Level 1 fair value hierarchy of $24,137
[December 31, 2011 - $122,550,]. The carrying amount of loans and receivables include client and trust funds on deposit
of $127,712 [December 31, 2011 - $124,978 ], accounts receivable of $62,585 [December 31, 2011 - $63,300] and other assets
of $18,252 [December 31, 2011 - $18,184]. AFS assets as at December 31, 2012 include CI’s marketable securities of $66,155
carried at fair value of which $26,875 have been classifi ed in the Level 1 fair value hierarchy and $39,280 in the Level 2 fair
value hierarchy, respectively [December 31, 2011 - $42,099 and $25,798 in the Level 1 fair value hierarchy and $16,301 in the
Level 2 fair value hierarchy, respectively].
77
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]
December 31, 2012 and 2011
Financial liabilities are classifi ed into two categories, FVPL and other liabilities. Included in accounts payable and accrued
liabilities as at December 31, 2012 is $2,940 classifi ed as Level 1 fair value hierarchy [December 31, 2011 – $460]. Other
liabilities include accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $115,250 [December 31, 2011 - $118,745], dividends payable of
$45,254 [December 31, 2011 - $42,526] and long-term debt of $594,368 [December 31, 2011 - $780,355].
For all other fi nancial assets and fi nancial liabilities, the carrying value approximates fair value due to the short-term nature
of these instruments.
11. RISK MANAGEMENT
Risk management is an integrated process with independent oversight. CI’s management and compliance group has
established a control environment that ensures risks are reviewed regularly and that risk controls throughout CI are
operating in accordance with regulatory requirements. CI’s senior management takes an active role in the risk management
process by reviewing policies and procedures within each business segment and assessing and mitigating the various
fi nancial risks that could impact CI’s fi nancial position and results of operations.
CI’s fi nancial instruments bear the following fi nancial risks:
[A] MARKET RISK
Market risk is the risk of a fi nancial loss resulting from adverse changes in underlying market factors, such as interest
rates, foreign exchange rates, and equity prices. Management of CI’s market risk is the responsibility of the Chief Financial
Offi cer. The corporate fi nance group reviews the exposure to interest rate risk, foreign currency risk and equity risk
by identifying, monitoring and reporting potential market risks to the Chief Financial Offi cer. A description of each
component of market risk is described below:
Interest rate risk is the risk of gain or loss due to the volatility of interest rates.
Foreign exchange risk is the risk of gain or loss due to volatility of foreign exchange rates.
Equity risk is the risk of gain or loss due to the changes in the prices and the volatility of individual equity instruments
and equity indexes.
CI’s fi nancial performance is indirectly exposed to market risk. Any decline in fi nancial markets or lack of sustained growth
in such markets may result in a corresponding decline in the performance and may adversely affect CI’s assets under
management and fi nancial results.
78
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]
December 31, 2012 and 2011
[i] Interest rate risk
Interest rate risk arises from the possibility that changes in interest rates will affect the value of fi nancial instruments.
Fluctuations in interest rates have a direct impact on the interest payments CI makes on its long-term debt.
Debt outstanding on CI’s credit facility of $96,000 [2011 - $33,000] is borrowed at a fl oating interest rate. The existing
credit facility provides CI with the option of fi xing interest rates, should CI change its view on its exposure to rising interest
rates. As at December 31, 2012, CI also has $500,000 fi xed interest rate Debentures [2011 - $750,000]. In 2009 CI entered
into interest rate swap agreements with a Canadian chartered bank to convert the fi xed interest rates on $250,000 of the
2012 Debentures and $200,000 of the 2014 Debentures to fl oating interest rates.
Based on the amount borrowed under the credit facility and Debentures outstanding as at December 31, 2012, each 0.50%
increase or decrease in interest rates would result in annual interest expense increasing or decreasing by $1.5 million [2011
- $2.4 million], respectively.
[ii] Foreign exchange risk
As at December 31, 2012, net fi nancial assets of $8 million [2011 - $7 million] were denominated in U.S. currency. A 10%
increase or decrease in U.S. exchange rates would result in a foreign exchange gain or loss of $0.8 million [2011 - $0.7
million], respectively. CI may enter into forward contracts to manage its foreign exchange exposure.
[iii] Equity risk
CI’s marketable securities as at December 31, 2012 of $66,155 [2011 - $42,099] are exposed to equity risk. Based on the
carrying amount of these assets, an increase or decrease in equity market prices by 10% would result in estimated gains
or losses of $6.6 million [2011 - $4.2 million], respectively.
[B] LIQUIDITY RISK
Liquidity risk arises from the possibility that CI will encounter diffi culties in meeting its fi nancial obligations as they fall
due. CI manages its liquidity risk through a combination of cash received from operations as well as borrowings under its
revolving credit facility. Liquidity is monitored through a daily cash management process that includes the projection of
cash fl ows to ensure CI meets its funding obligations.
79
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]
December 31, 2012 and 2011
CI’s liabilities have contractual maturities, excluding interest payments, as follows:
Total
$
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
119,721
Dividends payable
Client and trust funds payable
Long-term debt
Total
45,254
125,773
596,000
886,748
2013
$
119,721
45,254
125,773
24,000
314,748
2014
$
—
—
—
224,000
224,000
2015
$
—
—
—
48,000
48,000
2016
$
—
—
—
300,000
300,000
[C] CREDIT RISK
Credit risk arises from the potential that investors, clients or counterparties fail to satisfy their obligations.
As at December 31, 2012, fi nancial assets of $208,549 [2011 - $206,462], represented by client and trust funds on deposit of
$127,712 [2011 - $124,978], accounts receivable of $62,585 [2011 - $63,300] and other assets of $18,252 [2011 - $18,184], were
exposed to credit risk. CI does not have a signifi cant exposure to any individual counterparty. Credit risk is mitigated by
regularly monitoring the credit performance of each individual counterparty and holding collateral, where appropriate.
Client and trust funds on deposit consist mainly of cash deposits or unsettled trade receivables. CI may also extend
amounts to clients on a margin basis for security purchases. Collateral is provided in margin accounts by each client in
the form of securities purchased and/or other securities and cash balances. The credit extended is limited by regulatory
requirements and by CI’s internal credit policy. Credit risk is managed by dealing with counterparties CI believes to be
creditworthy and by actively monitoring credit and margin exposure and the fi nancial health of the counterparties.
Credit risk associated with accounts receivable is limited as the balance primarily consists of trade receivables that are
outstanding for less than 90 days.
Other assets primarily represent loans granted under CI’s employee share purchase plan and loans extended to investment
advisors under CI’s hiring and incentive program. Employee loans are collateralized by CI shares and become due
immediately upon termination of the employee or upon the sale of the shares held as collateral. Commissions may be
used to offset loan amounts made to investment advisors in the event of default. Credit risk associated with other assets
is limited given the nature of the relationship with the counterparties.
80
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]
December 31, 2012 and 2011
12. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
CI’s objectives in managing capital are to maintain a capital structure that allows CI to meet its growth strategies and build
long-term shareholder value, while satisfying its fi nancial obligations and meeting its long-term debt covenants.
CI’s capital is comprised of shareholders’ equity and long-term debt [including current portion of long-term debt]. CI’s
senior management is responsible for the management of capital. CI’s Board of Directors is responsible for reviewing and
approving CI’s capital policy and management.
CI and its subsidiaries are subject to minimum regulatory capital requirements whereby suffi cient cash and other liquid
assets must be on hand to maintain capital requirements rather than using them in connection with its business. Failure
to maintain required regulatory capital by CI may result in fi nes, suspension or revocation of registration by the relevant
securities regulator. As at December 31, 2012 and 2011, CI met its capital requirements.
CI’s capital consists of the following:
As at
As at
December 31, 2012
December 31, 2011
$
$
1,675,988
594,368
2,270,356
1,620,185
780,355
2,400,540
Shareholders’ equity
Long-term debt
Total capital
13. COMMITMENTS
Lease commitments
CI has entered into leases relating to the rental of offi ce premises and computer equipment. CI has the option to renew
certain leases. The approximate future minimum annual rental payments under such leases are as follows:
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018 and thereafter
$
11,030
9,621
9,054
8,989
8,574
57,604
81
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]
December 31, 2012 and 2011
Advisor services agreements
CI is a party to certain advisor services agreements, which provide that the advisor has the option to require CI to
purchase a practice that cannot otherwise be transitioned to a qualifi ed buyer. The purchase price would be in accordance
with a pre-determined formula contained in the advisor services agreements.
Indemnities
CI has agreed to indemnify its directors and offi cers, and certain of its employees in accordance with its by-laws.
CI maintains insurance policies that may provide coverage against certain claims.
14. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Bank of Nova Scotia [“Scotiabank”] owns approximately 37% of the common shares of CI, and is therefore considered a
related party. CI has entered into transactions related to the advisory and distribution of its mutual funds with Scotiabank
and its related parties. These transactions are in the normal course of operations and are recorded at the agreed upon
exchange amounts. During the year ended December 31, 2012, CI incurred charges for deferred sales commissions of
$4,926 and trailer fees of $20,278, respectively [2011 - $4,896 and $19,978, respectively] which were paid or payable to
Scotiabank and its related parties. The balance payable to Scotiabank and its related parties as at December 31, 2012 of
$1,745 [December 31, 2011 - $1,681] is included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities.
Scotiabank was the provider of and administrative agent for CI’s revolving credit facility during the period January 1, 2011
to March 17, 2011. During the period January 1, 2011 to March 17, 2011, interest and stamping fees of $389 were recorded as
interest expense.
Also, on December 16, 2009, CI entered into an interest rate swap agreement with Scotiabank as described in Note 5.
82
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]
December 31, 2012 and 2011
15. SEGMENTED INFORMATION
CI has two reportable segments: Asset Management and Asset Administration. These segments refl ect CI’s internal
fi nancial reporting and performance measurement.
The Asset Management segment includes the operating results and fi nancial position of CI Investments and CI Private
Counsel LP, which derive their revenues principally from the fees earned on the management of several families of mutual
and segregated funds.
The Asset Administration segment includes the operating results and fi nancial position of AWM and its subsidiaries,
including Assante Capital Management Ltd. and Assante Financial Management Ltd. These companies derive their
revenues principally from commissions and fees earned on the sale of mutual funds and other fi nancial products, and
ongoing service to clients.
83
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]
December 31, 2012 and 2011
Segmented information as at and for the year ended December 31, 2012 is as follows:
Asset
Asset
Intersegment
management
administration
eliminations
$
$
$
Total
$
1,277,698
—
39,051
1,316,749
233,285
389,066
—
220,722
15,008
235,730
52,724
—
—
174,464
—
1,277,698
(94,737)
—
125,985
54,059
(94,737)
1,457,742
—
(15,112)
(76,201)
286,009
373,954
98,263
168,110
2,029
1,562
3,236
(4,135)
165,537
—
5,265
792,490
231,986
(95,448)
929,028
524,259
3,744
711
528,714
(24,937)
(151,614)
352,163
599,957
264,359
(11,709)
852,607
927,344
192,582
—
—
—
1,119,926
999,082
456,941
(11,709)
2,971,615
999,082
2,526,383
Management fees
Administration fees
Other revenue
Total revenue
Selling, general and administrative
Trailer fees
Investment dealer fees
Amortization of deferred sales
commissions and intangibles
Other expenses
Total expenses
Income before income taxes
and non-segmented items
Interest expense
Provision for income taxes
Net income for the year
Identifi able assets
Indefi nite life intangibles
Goodwill
Fund contracts
Total assets
84
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]
December 31, 2012 and 2011
Segmented information as at and for the year ended December 31, 2011 is as follows:
Management fees
Administration fees
Other revenue
Total revenue
Selling, general and administrative
Trailer fees
Investment dealer fees
Amortization of deferred sales
commissions and intangibles
Other expenses
Total expenses
Income before income taxes
and non-segmented items
Interest expense
Provision for income taxes
Net income for the year
Identifi able assets
Indefi nite life intangibles
Goodwill
Fund contracts
Total assets
Asset
Asset
Intersegment
management
administration
eliminations
$
$
$
Total
$
1,302,773
—
45,558
1,348,331
235,938
394,059
—
226,179
15,690
241,869
54,838
—
—
179,529
—
1,302,773
(93,907)
—
132,272
61,248
(93,907)
1,496,293
—
(14,605)
(75,776)
290,776
379,454
103,753
169,665
4,178
1,504
2,749
(4,352)
166,817
—
6,927
803,840
238,620
(94,733)
947,727
544,491
3,249
826
548,566
(27,496)
(144,171)
376,899
731,810
246,536
(12,372)
965,974
927,344
192,582
—
—
—
1,119,926
999,082
999,082
2,658,236
439,118
(12,372)
3,084,982
85
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]
December 31, 2012 and 2011
16. COMPENSATION OF KEY MANAGEMENT
The remuneration of directors and other key management personnel of CI during the years ended December 31, is as follows:
Salaries
Equity-based compensation
Total
17. FUTURE ACCOUNTING CHANGES
2012
$
10,746
878
11,624
2011
$
9,887
1,365
11,252
CI is currently evaluating the impact the following new standards issued by the IASB will have on its fi nancial statements.
CI will has not yet determined whether to early adopt IFRS 9 – Financial Instruments.
International Accounting Standard
IFRS 10 – Consolidated Financial Statements
IFRS 12 – Disclosures of Interests in Other Entities
IFRS 13 – Fair Value Measurement
IFRS 9 – Financial Instruments
Issue Date
May 12, 2011
May 12, 2011
May 12, 2011
November 12, 2009
Effective Date
January 1, 2013
January 1, 2013
January 1, 2013
January 1, 2015
IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements (“IFRS 10”) replaces the consolidation requirements in SIC-12, Consolidation – Special
Purpose Entities and IAS 27, Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements. IFRS 10 builds on existing principles by identifying
the concept of control as the determining factor in whether an entity should be included within the consolidated fi nancial
statements of the parent company.
IFRS 12 Disclosures of Interests in Other Entities establishes disclosure requirements for interests in other entities, including
subsidiaries, joint arrangements, associates and unconsolidated structured entities. The standard carries forward existing
disclosures and also introduces signifi cant additional disclosure requirements that address the nature of, and risks associated
with, an entity’s interest in other entities.
86
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]
December 31, 2012 and 2011
IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement establishes the defi nition of fair value and sets out a single IFRS framework for measuring fair
value and the required disclosures.
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments (“IFRS 9”) will replace IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement (“IAS 39”). IFRS 9
uses a single approach to determine whether a fi nancial asset is measured at amortized cost or fair value, replacing the multiple
rules in IAS 39. The approach in IFRS 9 is based on how an entity manages its fi nancial instruments in the context of its business
model and the contractual cash fl ow characteristics of the fi nancial assets. The new standard also requires a single impairment
method to be used, replacing the multiple impairment methods in IAS 39.
18. COMPARATIVE FIGURES
Certain comparative fi gures have been reclassifi ed to conform to the consolidated fi nancial statement presentation in the
current year.
87
Corporate Directory
CI Financial
DIRECTORS
Ronald D. Besse
President,
Besseco Holdings Inc.;
Lead Director
Toronto, Ontario
Stephen A. MacPhail
President and
Chief Executive Offi cer,
CI Financial;
Director
Toronto, Ontario
OFFICERS
G. Raymond Chang
President,
G. Raymond Chang Ltd.;
Director
Toronto, Ontario
Stephen T. Moore
Managing Director,
Newhaven Asset
Management Inc.;
Director
Toronto, Ontario
Paul W. Derksen
Corporate Director;
Director
Clarksburg, Ontario
Tom P. Muir
Co-Managing Director,
Muir Detlefsen & Associates
Limited;
Director
Toronto, Ontario
William T. Holland
Chairman;
Director
Toronto, Ontario
A. Winn Oughtred
Corporate Director;
Director
Toronto, Ontario
Clay Horner
Partner,
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP;
Director
Toronto, Ontario
David J. Riddle
President,
C-Max Capital Inc.;
Director
Vancouver, B.C.
Stephen A. MacPhail
President and
Chief Executive Offi cer
Sheila A. Murray
Executive Vice-President,
General Counsel and Secretary
Douglas J. Jamieson
Senior Vice-President and
Chief Financial Offi cer
David C. Pauli
Executive Vice-President and
Chief Operating Offi cer
CI Investments
EXECUTIVES
Derek J. Green
President
Douglas J. Jamieson
Senior Vice-President and
Chief Financial Offi cer
David C. Pauli
Executive Vice-President and
Chief Operating Offi cer
Chris von Boetticher
Vice-President,
General Counsel and Secretary
Assante Wealth Management
EXECUTIVES
Steven J. Donald
President
James E. Ross
Senior Vice-President,
Wealth & Estate Planning
Robert J. Dorrell
Senior Vice-President,
Distribution Services
88
Corporate Information
Head Office
2 Queen Street East
Twentieth Floor
Toronto, Ontario M5C 3G7
Telephone: 416-364-1145
Toll Free: 1 800 268-9374
www.cifi nancial.com
Administration Office
15 York Street
Second Floor
Toronto, Ontario M5J 0A3
Investor Relations
Contact: Douglas J. Jamieson, Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Offi cer
Telephone: 416-364-1145
Toll Free: 1 800 268-9374
E-mail: investorrelations@ci.com
Trading Symbol
CI Financial trades on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol “CIX”.
Auditors
Ernst & Young LLP
Chartered Accountants
Toronto-Dominion Centre
P.O. Box 251
Toronto, Ontario M5K 1J7
Registrar and Transfer Agent
Computershare Investor Services Inc.
9th Floor, 100 University Avenue
Toronto, Ontario M5J 2Y1
Telephone: 1 800 564-6253
E-mail: caregistry@computershare.com
Normal Course Issuer Bid
Effective May 29, 2012, the Toronto Stock Exchange accepted CI’s notice of
intention to commence a normal course issuer bid (the “Notice”) through the
facilities of the Toronto Stock Exchange. Under the bid, CI may purchase up
to 6,000,000 Shares at the prevailing market price. Purchases under the bid
will terminate no later than May 28, 2013. As of March 31, 2013, CI has acquired
an aggregate of 528,100 Shares under the normal course issuer bid at an average
price of $22.80 per Share. Shareholders may obtain a copy of the Notice, without
charge, by contacting the Corporate Secretary of CI. The Corporation intends to
renew its Normal Course Issuer Bid effective May 29, 2013, subject to receipt of
approval from the Toronto Stock Exchange.
Shareholder rights plan
The Corporation entered into an agreement (the “Rights Plan Agreement”) dated
as of January 1, 2009 with Computershare Investor Services Inc., as rights agent,
in connection with the adoption of a shareholder rights plan (the “Rights Plan”).
The Corporation obtained the approval to amend and continue the Rights Plan
for a further term of three years, at the annual and special meeting of shareholders
held on June 1, 2011. Accordingly, the Rights Plan will terminate at the close of the
annual meeting of shareholders in 2014. The Notice of Meeting and Management
Information Circular of the Corporation dated May 2, 2011 includes a summary
of the Amended and Restated Rights Plan approved by the shareholders. The
complete text may be found on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.
Digital Report
This Annual Report can be downloaded from CI’s website at www.cifi nancial.com
under “Reports”.
89
2012
This Report contains forward-looking statements with respect to CI, including its business operations and strategy and fi nancial
performance and condition. Although management believes that the expectations refl ected in such forward-looking statements are
reasonable, such statements involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by
such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause results to differ materially include, among other things, general economic
and market factors, including interest rates, business competition, changes in government regulations or in tax laws, and other factors
discussed in materials fi led with applicable securities regulatory authorities from time to time.
1302-0221_E (04/13)