Quarterlytics / Industrials / Security & Protection Services / CompX International Inc.

CompX International Inc.

cix · AMEX Industrials
Claim this profile
Ticker cix
Exchange AMEX
Sector Industrials
Industry Security & Protection Services
Employees 510
← All annual reports
FY2012 Annual Report · CompX International Inc.
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
Annual Report 
December 31, 2012

2012

Table of Contents

Financial Highlights 

Letter to Shareholders 

Ten-Year Historical Financial Highlights 

Subsidiary Profi les 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 

Consolidated Financial Statements 

Management’s Report to Shareholders 

Independent Auditors’ Report 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 

Corporate Directory 

Corporate Information 

2

4

16

18

20

46

47

48

53

88

89

Front cover image: Percé Rock, Gaspé, Québec

CI Financial Corp. is a diversifi ed wealth management fi rm and Canada’s third-largest investment fund company. Independent 

and Canadian-owned, CI provides a comprehensive selection of top-quality investment products and services. CI has two 

million clients and manages or administers approximately $105 billion in assets (as at March 31, 2013). CI operates primarily 

through subsidiaries CI Investments Inc. and Assante Wealth Management (Canada) Ltd.

CI Investments offers the industry’s broadest selection of investment funds under the CI, Black Creek, Cambridge, Harbour, 

Red Sky, Signature, Synergy, Portfolio Series, Portfolio Select Series and SunWise Essential Series 2 banners.  

Assante Wealth Management provides fi nancial advisory services through a national network of 750 professional fi nancial 

advisors. Stonegate Private Counsel, a division of CI Private Counsel LP, provides wealth planning services to high net worth 

individuals and families.

CI’s other businesses include Perimeter Markets Inc., which operates alternative marketplaces for trading Canadian fi xed-

income products under the CBID brand. CI also owns interests in Altrinsic Global Advisors, LLC, a global investment manager 

based in Greenwich, Connecticut, and in Toronto-based alternative asset managers Red Sky Capital Management Ltd. and 

Lawrence Park Capital Partners Ltd.

1

Financial Highlights

( in millions of dollars, except share amounts) 

As at December 31, 2012 

As at December 31, 2011  

% change

Assets under management  

Total assets  

Shares outstanding  

75,723 

98,922 

69,558 

91,102 

282,914,642 

283,567,039 

9

9

0

( in millions of dollars, except share amounts) 

As at December 31, 2012 

As at December 31, 2011  

% change

For the year ended  

For the year ended 

Average assets under management  

Management fees  

Total revenues  

SG&A  

Trailer fees  

Net income  

Earnings per share  

EBITDA*  

EBITDA* per share  

Dividends recorded per share 

Average shares outstanding  

72,606 

1,277.7 

1,457.8 

286.0 

374.0 

352.2 

1.24 

703.6 

2.48 

0.96 

72,186 

1,302.8 

1,496.3 

290.8 

379.5 

376.9 

1.31 

726.2 

2.53 

0.89 

283,389,571 

286,997,604 

1

(2)

(3)

(2)

(1)

(7)

(5)

(3)

(2)

8

(1)

* EBITDA (Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) is not a standardized earnings measure prescribed by IFRS; 
however, management believes that most of its shareholders, creditors, other stakeholders and investment analysts prefer to include 
the use of this performance measure in analyzing CI’s results. CI’s method of calculating this measure may not be comparable to 
similar measures presented by other companies. 

CIX VS S&P/TSX COMPOSITE INDEX TOTAL RETURN (IPO IN JUNE 1994 = 100)

3,500

3,000

2,500

2,000

1,500

1,000

500

0

2,711

2,760

2,425

2,445

2,595

2,535

S&P/TSX Composite Index

CIX

3,125

942
195

’03 

1,339

1,468

244

284

’04 

’05 

May 31 

1,562

354

395

434

291

392

461

421

451

’06 

’06† 

’07 

’08 

’09 
Dec. 31

’10 

’11 

’12 

† Dec. 2006, seven month period.

2

 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT ($ BILLIONS)

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

56.9

49.1

44.2

28.8

62.7

67.2

64.2

52.8

72.8

69.6

75.7

’03 

’04 

’05 

May 31 

’06 

’06† 

’07 

’08 

’09 
Dec. 31

’10 

’11 

’12 

† Dec. 2006, seven month period.

CIX SHARE PRICE ($)

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

31.03

26.72

28.07

22.00

22.50

21.10

24.93

16.44

17.30

11.90

14.50

’03 

’04 

’05 

May 31 

’06 

’06† 

’07 

’08 

’09 
Dec. 31

’10 

’11 

’12 

† Dec. 2006, seven month period.

DIVIDENDS PER SHARE ($)

2.50

2.00

1.50

1.00

0.50

0

2.25

1.74

1.155

0.675

0.70

0.77

0.63

0.89

0.955

0.29

’03 

0.405

’04 

’05 

May 31 

’06 

’06† 

’07 

’08 

’09 
Dec. 31

’10 

’11 

’12 

† Dec. 2006, seven month period.

3

 
 
 
 
 
 
Letter to Shareholders

DEAR SHAREHOLDERS, 

Your company had an excellent year in 2012. In the face of continued volatility in fi nancial markets and lingering doubts 

about the strength of the global economy, CI Financial delivered strong results. Most notably, our assets under management 

grew 9% year over year to reach a new record, our net sales increased 200%, and our cash fl ow supported an increase in 

the dividend and a continued strengthening of our fi nancial position. 

Although  2012  marked  the  fourth  year  of  recovery  following  the  global  fi nancial  crisis,  investor  confi dence  was  still 

sensitive to the latest news. Equity markets fell sharply in the second quarter and were choppy over the following months 

in response to concerns over the ongoing European debt issues, the pace of growth in the U.S. and China, as well as the 

U.S. presidential election and the “fi scal cliff.” 

In the fourth quarter, however, share prices staged a decisive rally that continued into the fi rst quarter of 2013. For the year, 

the S&P/TSX Composite Index gained 7.2%, while the S&P 500 Index rose 13.5% and the MSCI World Index was up 14.1% 

(all in Canadian dollars). It’s worthwhile noting that the Canadian index underperformed U.S. stocks for the second year 

in a row and remains below both its 2011 high and its all-time high reached in 2008. Meanwhile, in the U.S., the Dow Jones 

Industrial Average and the S&P 500 Index powered to new closing highs in March 2013. These moves signalled a meaningful 

shift in sentiment, as investors seemed to accept that the recovery is genuine and Europe has its debt problems more or 

less under control.

At CI, we stuck to our game plan, investing in our portfolio management teams, product lineup, technology, the training 

and development of staff, and sales and marketing. You can see our long-term strategy outlined in the next section. The 

result of these efforts has been that CI has continued to grow and build on its success, while many competitors have 

retrenched and shrunk. And with the recent turn in the markets, CI was well positioned to reap the rewards. In the fi rst 

quarter of 2013, CI posted its highest level of fi rst quarter net sales in seven years.

4

 
CI’S LONG-TERM STRATEGY 

   Product  quality  and  diversity.  By  providing  a  broad  selection  of  high-quality  products  and  services  to  Canadian 

investors, we reduce our dependence on any single market sector, product or portfolio manager and ensure we are 

well positioned to respond to the changing needs of investors. More importantly, it enhances our relationships with 

advisors by allowing them to meet their clients’ needs through a single supplier.

   Talented  and  experienced  investment  managers.  CI  has  signifi cant  assets  under  management,  and  we  use  this  size 

and scale to attract and retain the best investment managers in the industry. We select portfolio managers based on 

a reputation for skilled investment management and their long-term track records.

   Operational and performance excellence. This includes the prudent and effi cient management of our funds and our 

company, the development of high-quality products and a well-known brand.

   Superior service. By exceeding the service expectations of our investors and our multiple distribution networks, we aim 

to solidify these relationships and maintain a reputation for sound management. 

   Skill and knowledge. CI’s managers and employees possess the specialized knowledge and experience to anticipate 

client needs, develop appropriate products and market those products effectively. CI provides training programs to 

ensure that the expertise of its employees and advisors remains at a high level.

FINANCIAL RESULTS

Robust asset growth

Assets under management were $75.7 billion at December 31, 2012, a robust increase of 9% from $69.6 billion a year earlier. 

This was a month-end record for CI and compares to the increase of 7.2% for the S&P/TSX Composite Index. Total assets, 

which  include  assets  under  administration,  were  $98.9  billion  at  year-end,  which  is  also  a  gain  of  9%.  With  the  strong 

performance of our funds early this year, assets under management grew another 6% to $80.5 billion at March 31, 2013, and 

total assets reached $104.7 billion.

5

 
Average assets under management also reached a record level of $72.6 billion in 2012, though the year-over-year gain was 

1%. This refl ects the pattern of market volatility throughout 2012, as the growth in our assets was not achieved in a steady, 

upwards progression.

Refl ecting the change in average assets, revenues for the year were fl at, at $1.5 billion. Net income was $352.2 million in 

2012, down 7% from $376.9 million in the prior year. Earnings per share were down 5% to $1.24 from $1.31 in 2011. However, 

there were two items that affected this comparison: CI received an insurance settlement of $3.5 million in 2011, and there 

was an $18 million non-cash tax adjustment in 2012, resulting from an increase in future corporate income taxes imposed by 

the Ontario government. Adjusting for those two items means that the decline in net income was less than 1%. In looking 

at  pre-tax  operating  earnings  per  share,  which  is  designed  to  show  CI’s  underlying  profi tability  before  taxes  and  other 

items, we see that this measure was $2.26 in 2012 and $2.28 in 2011 – again, a change of less than 1%.

One of the themes in our industry in recent years has been the dominance of income funds in the sales charts as investors 

have continued to shun equity funds since the severe bear market of 2008-09. Statistics provided by research fi rm Investor 

Economics Inc. indicate that net sales of funds classifi ed as fi xed-income and income balanced accounted for 137% of 

industry net sales in 2012 (excluding money market funds). 

CI is well represented in the income segment with a number of funds with good performance and sales. However, income 

funds have lower management fees than balanced or equity funds. Our institutional products, which are becoming an 

increasingly important part of our business, also have lower management fees than most retail funds. What this means for 

our results is that funds with lower fees are becoming a larger part of our overall asset mix.

A high level of effi ciency

CI has been able to offset this trend and maintain its profi tability through the strict control of expenses. Selling, general 

and administrative expenses expressed as percentage of average assets under management declined 3% to 39 basis points 

in 2012 from 40 basis points in 2011. We are proud of this achievement by our staff, especially given that it occurred while 

assets under management grew by 9% and we increased our expenditure in key areas of our operations, including portfolio 

management and sales and marketing. 

Free cash fl ow amounted to $423.9 million in 2012 and it was used to strengthen the fi nancial position of the company 

by paying down debt and to return cash to you, our shareholders, through share repurchases and dividends.

6

During the year, CI’s debt, net of cash and marketable securities not needed for regulatory capital, was reduced by $204.2 

million to $526.5 million, which included the repayment of $250 million in debentures that matured in December 2012, 

partially offset by an increase in our credit facility. This level of debt is quite manageable for CI, leaving us with the capacity 

to fi nance acquisitions or other strategic opportunities. It represents a ratio of net debt to EBITDA (earnings before interest, 

taxes, depreciation and amortization) of 0.7:1 – a decrease from 1.1:1 a year earlier. 

Creating wealth for shareholders

In 2012, we repurchased 1.4 million shares at a cost of $30.5 million, and paid dividends of $269.2 million. The dividend 

rate  was  raised  to  $0.08  per  month  per  share  from  $0.075  during  the  year,  with  a  further  increase  to  $0.085  effective 

March 2013.

CI has been consistent in boosting its dividend as our business has grown. Our annual dividend payment has increased 

from $0.57 per share in 2009, when CI converted back to a corporation from an income trust, to its current rate of $1.02 

per share – an increase of 79%. At the same time, we have been prudent in ensuring that the dividend is supported by our 

cash fl ow. As a percentage of free cash fl ow, our dividend payout ratio in 2012 was 63%, compared to 59% in the prior year. 

This is driven by our long-term commitment to return cash not required to fi nance the company’s operations and growth 

to our shareholders, and we believe that our record in this is matched by few companies. Since our $25 million initial public 

offering in 1994, CI has returned $4.2 billion to shareholders, consisting of $3.0 billion in dividends and distributions and $1.2 

billion in share repurchases (as of February 28, 2013).

In 2012, CI’s share price responded to the improving fi nancial markets and our asset growth, appreciating to $24.93 from 

$21.10 over the 12-month period. The return including dividends during the year was 23.3%. With rising markets in early 

2013, CI’s share price appreciated a further 13.7% to $28.10, and our market capitalization reached $8.0 billion as of March 31. 

We are especially proud of CI’s long-term return. From the June 1994 IPO to the end of March 2013, CI has returned 3,454%, 

versus 366% for the S&P/TSX Composite Index and 1,135% for the fi nancial services sub-index. This equates to a compound 

annual growth rate of 20.9%, making CI one of the Top 5 performing stocks on the index over that period.

7

OPERATING RESULTS

Net sales increase 200% 

CI had impressive sales in 2012, reaching $10.6 billion in gross sales – the fi rst time we exceeded $10 billion since 2008 – and 

$973 million in net sales. This represents increases of 16.1% and 201%, respectively, over the year before. Industry net sales 

as reported by the Investment Funds Institute of Canada rose 43% to $30.4 billion.

Approximately  three-quarters  of  our  net  sales  for  the  year  were  posted  in  the  fourth  quarter,  accompanying  the 

improvement in investor confi dence and the turnaround in the markets. As we said at the start of this letter, CI is well 

positioned to benefi t from the change in sentiment given the performance of our portfolio managers and the quality and 

breadth of our product lineup.

The sources of our sales were quite diversifi ed, with both the institutional and retail divisions contributing. On the retail 

side, our key distribution partners all contributed to our tally of net sales. (See below for a more detailed discussion of our 

distribution strategy.) 

When we look at our sales by product, there are a few observations we would like to share. By asset class, income-related 

funds continued to dominate our sales. There are signs of a growing interest in equity funds, though this comes after stocks 

have already experienced a four-year bull market. (The S&P 500 Index, for example, gained 133% from its March 2009 low 

to the end of March 2013.) By product platform, segregated funds, which combine mutual funds with insurance-based 

guarantees,  continue  to  provide  good  gross  sales  but  remain  in  net  redemptions.  Though  these  funds  provide  unique 

benefi ts, their appeal has been diminished as insurance companies have been forced to reduce benefi ts and increase prices 

to refl ect the increased costs of providing the guarantees. In addition, many policies within our older segregated fund 

families continue to mature.

Meanwhile, our managed solutions are attracting strong fl ows. These include CI Private Investment Management, a program 

aimed at higher net worth investors, and our portfolio solutions, which include Portfolio Select Series, the award-winning 

Portfolio Series and, in the Assante channel, Evolution Private Managed Accounts. The shift to portfolio solutions, also 

known as wrap or fund-of-funds products, has been a notable industry phenomenon. According to Investor Economics, 

fund wraps have experienced a compound annual growth rate in assets of 9.0% since 2007, versus 1.1% for stand-alone 

mutual funds. As we often say, a portfolio program is only as good as its underlying funds and so CI’s products in this 

category stand out for the quality of performance and portfolio management. CI Investment Consulting, which oversees 

our managed solutions, also adds signifi cant value through asset allocation, risk management and currency management. 

The  sales  momentum  of  the  fourth  quarter  has  accelerated  in  2013,  with  CI  posting  excellent  sales  and  the  best  fi rst 

quarter for net sales in seven years.

8

Outstanding performance

As we noted earlier, the solid performance of our funds is a crucial factor in our sales and CI has provided consistent, 

above-average returns. At December 31, 2012, 60% of our long-term assets under management were fi rst or second quartile 

over one year and 81% were in the top two quartiles over 10 years. This strength is seen across our portfolio management 

lineup, from teams such as Signature Global Advisors, Cambridge Advisors, Harbour Advisors and Black Creek Investment 

Management.  Notable  highlights  in  2012  include  Cambridge  Canadian  Growth  Companies  Fund  and  Cambridge  Pure 

Canadian  Equity  Fund,  which  were  up  40.5%  and  34.3%,  respectively,  and  Black  Creek  International  Equity  Fund,  which 

gained 30.5% (all Class A versions).

CI’s performance continues to be recognized by industry awards. CI was the recipient of two 2012 Morningstar Canadian 

Investment Awards, with Portfolio Series winning Best Fund of Funds for the second consecutive year and Signature High 

Income Fund winning its fourth trophy. CI and its portfolio managers have taken home 33 Morningstar Canadian Investment 

Awards over the past 10 years. CI funds also earned eight Lipper Fund Awards in 2012 and another seven in 2013. CI has 

received 46 Lipper Fund Awards, which recognize funds that have excelled in delivering consistently strong risk-adjusted 

performance relative to peers, since the start of the program in Canada in 2007. 

In addition, CI Investments was one of the three top fi rms in the 2012 Brendan Wood International Canadian investment 

rankings, with seven of our professionals being named “TopGun Investment Minds.” TopGun status recognizes investment 

professionals “who on a competitive basis ranked highest for investment wisdom and professionalism.”

Exceptional portfolio management

In conjunction with providing a wide selection of product platforms and fund mandates, CI follows a strategy of providing 

a  broad  choice  of  portfolio  management  teams  offering  a  variety  of  investment  approaches  and  specialties.  CI  has 

relationships with 18 portfolio management teams, of which three are in-house – Signature, Cambridge and Harbour – and 

the remainder are sub-advisors. CI holds minority interests in three – Altrinsic Global Advisors of Greenwich, Connecticut, 

and Toronto-based alternative asset managers Red Sky Capital Management, which focuses on North American equities, 

and Lawrence Park Capital Partners, which boasts a unique approach to fi xed-income investing. CI Investment Consulting, 

an in-house group of analysts, monitors the portfolio management teams, and oversees our managed solutions.

Over the long-term, our three in-house teams have performed well and their share of our overall assets under management 

has increased. Today, their share stands at about 75% of total. We continue to invest in building the expertise of our in-

house teams, and the example of Cambridge Advisors illustrates the success of our approach. Cambridge was founded 

in  January  2008  under  the  direction  of  veteran  portfolio  manager  Alan  Radlo  and  has  offi ces  in  Boston  and  Toronto. 

Mr. Radlo was joined by senior Portfolio Managers Robert Swanson and Brandon Snow in 2011. In just fi ve years, the team 

has established an excellent track record of performance and attracted over $6 billion in assets. The potential for growth 

in the Cambridge family remains outstanding, in both the retail and institutional channels. 

9

Our  stakes  in  Red  Sky  and  Lawrence  Park  were  purchased  in  2010  and  March  2012,  respectively,  as  part  of  our  efforts 

to  diversify  our  sources  of  growth.  CI  provides  administrative  services  for  each  fi rm’s  hedge  fund  and  our  backing  has 

assisted them in raising assets. We have continued to develop our relationships with them by retaining each fi rm to manage 

a portion of the portfolio of an existing CI fund. In addition, we launched Red Sky Canadian Equity Corporate Class to 

provide  exclusive  exposure  to  the  Red  Sky  team.  We  expect  to  launch  a  dedicated  Lawrence  Park  income  fund  later 

this year. 

CI’s portfolio management strategy not only allows for diversity and fosters performance, but also offers a deep roster of 

talent to launch new products and provide continuity of management. For example, in 2012, our sub-advisory relationship 

with  Barometer  Capital  ended,  and  the  portfolios  they  managed  were  switched  to  Cambridge  Advisors  in  a  seamless 

transfer of responsibilities. 

Quality and choice 

CI  continually  reviews  its  product  lineup  to  ensure  it  remains  relevant  to  the  marketplace  and  meets  the  needs  of 

Canadian investors. In 2012, our new retail products included:

   Cambridge Income Fund, the fi rst income fund managed by the Cambridge team. It has attracted over $580 million in 

assets in just over a year. 

   Signature High Yield Bond Fund, which offers dedicated exposure to this asset class.
   Signature Global Dividend Fund, which provides conservative exposure to high-quality dividend-paying global companies 

and  which  we  believe  is  especially  timely  today,  as  investors  become  more  open  to  increasing  their  investments  in 

equities.

  Red Sky Canadian Equity Corporate Class, a North American equity fund.
   SunWise  Essential  Series  2,  a  segregated  fund  program  offered  in  partnership  with  Sun  Life  Financial.  This  program, 

launched to replace SunWise Essential Series, which was closed to new investors, maintains CI and Sun Life’s presence 

in this market. 

We also made a signifi cant change to our fund lineup by merging the Castlerock-branded funds into the CI lineup. When 

we purchased Hartford Investments Canada Corp. in December 2010, we were able to integrate its corporate operations 

immediately, but were not in a position to integrate the funds, which were being administered by a third-party service 

provider. We created the Castlerock brand and operated the funds as a separate division of CI. 

In mid-2012, we moved the funds to the CI administrative platform, which allowed us to reduce duplication in our lineup 

by merging 18 Castlerock and CI funds into other CI funds, and to replace the variable operating expenses of the former 

Castlerock  funds  with  a  lower  fi xed  administration  fee  –  benefi ting  the  investors  in  those  funds.  The  funds  were  also 

renamed and we are no longer using the Castlerock brand. 

10

This was the fi nal step in integrating this very successful acquisition, which though small relative to CI’s assets, was benefi cial 

in growing our assets and developing and strengthening valuable relationships in portfolio management and distribution. 

Building strong partnerships 

CI has been successful over the past 10 to 15 years in developing multiple channels of distribution for its funds and its 

investment management expertise. This strategy has been an important driver of CI’s growth and differentiates us from 

other independent fund companies. 

Today, our distribution strategy has three central pillars: building the Assante dealership into the premier wealth planning 

organization in Canada; growing our retail investment fund business through an intense focus on selected distribution 

partners; and expanding our presence in the institutional market through CI Institutional Asset Management.

Assante 

Assante continued to grow through 2012, building upon its status as one of Canada’s pre-eminent fi nancial advisory fi rms. 

Assets at Assante and Stonegate Private Counsel increased 8.0% over the year to $24.3 billion, refl ecting the improving 

performance of fi nancial markets and increasing levels of investment from our clients. Assante’s advisors maintain a focus 

on the conservative management of the fi nancial affairs of Canadian families. Assante continues to attract new clients 

and additional assets from existing clients as Canadians continue to seek out holistic fi nancial advice. Assante clients were 

well served through the volatile environment of the past few years by our emphasis on investing discipline and patience. 

Our advisors provide diversifi ed portfolio solutions, backed by the expertise of leading money managers, including the 

portfolio  management  teams  of  CI  Investments.  Strong  fi nancial  markets  and  increasing  sales  through  the  fi rst  three 

months of this year increased assets to $25.3 billion as at March 31, 2013.

Assante sets itself apart from its competitors by providing extensive resources related to meeting the wealth management 

needs of its clients. Assante’s commitment to an integrated approach to wealth management that incorporates all aspects 

of  managing  a  client’s  fi nances  –  risk  management,  estate  planning  and  tax  planning,  in  addition  to  sound  investment 

management – is demonstrated through its programs and services. Assante assists its advisors in providing this advanced 

level of service through a large in-house staff that includes tax, insurance, estate planning and other experts.  In addition, 

Assante has launched a practice management initiative providing its clients with clear roadmaps for achieving their wealth 

management objectives. An extension of this program is ongoing professional development for Assante advisors, both new 

and experienced, in areas such as compliance and advanced fi nancial planning topics.

Assante continues a comprehensive communications program for advisors and clients that provides timely insights from 

portfolio managers on market developments and the positioning of their mandates, as well as relevant information on 

issues  such  as  income,  estate  and  succession  planning.  Through  initiatives  such  as  the  Wealth  Matters  series,  Assante 

continues to demonstrate its leadership and a focus on delivering valued advice to Canadians. 

11

Assante’s recruiting efforts consist of a two-pronged focus on attracting experienced advisors who embrace its philosophy 

of wealth management, as well as younger advisors who will provide ongoing relationship continuity for clients as part of 

existing advisory teams. Assante continued to add new advisors in its network in 2012. 

Sound advice coupled with fi nancial stability and operating effi ciency is critical in fostering trusting relationships with 

clients in the continued uncertainty of today’s environment. Assante’s competitive advantages include the security of CI’s 

fi nancial strength, the benefi ts of CI’s experience and support in operations, technology, client services and sales, as well as 

its portfolio management expertise and products. With this solid foundation, Assante is pursuing a growth strategy based 

on continuing recruitment and fostering the growth of our advisors’ practices through the provision of wealth planning 

expertise, enhanced systems support and sophisticated portfolio solutions.

Distribution Partners 

In distributing its retail funds, CI maintains solid relationships with fi nancial advisors at numerous fi rms across Canada. 

However, our size and fi nancial resources enable us to provide additional sales support and service to certain preferred 

partners: Assante, Sun Life advisors and Edward Jones. Our preferred partners continue to make signifi cant contributions 

to our sales and growth. Our goal is to strengthen our existing relationships and extend this model into new channels. 

CIIAM 

CI Institutional Asset Management (CIIAM) experienced 12% growth during the year due to strong net sales and portfolio 

returns, and ended the year with $11.5 billion in assets under management. CIIAM operates in two general institutional 

markets:  Alliance,  which  typically  involves  sub-advising  mandates  or  participating  in  fund-of-fund  programs  at  other 

fi nancial  institutions,  and  the  more  traditional  area  of  pensions,  foundations  and  endowments.  The  Alliance  part  of 

our  operations  was  awarded  two  sizable  new  mandates  in  2012.  Our  pensions  and  endowments  business  experienced 

another excellent year of client growth with six new clients, bringing the total to 20 new clients won in the past two years 

in this segment. 

As part of its growth strategy, CIIAM has boosted our commitment to a true multi-manager, multi-product institutional 

offering with a core Canadian equity fund, a global equity mandate and a series of target date funds joining our balanced 

mandate on our product shelf. The target date funds, the CI LifeCycle Portfolios, which were launched in 2012, are important 

solutions for defi ned contribution pension plans as well as other types of employer-sponsored group savings plans.

Driving growth through sales and marketing 

CI has successfully established enduring relationships with the thousands of advisors who sell our funds. This is a credit 

to our staff in our administration, client services and sales and marketing departments who provide crucial day-to-day 

support  to  advisors.  However,  our  industry  has  become  increasingly  competitive  and  we  are  not  taking  advisors  and 

investors for granted.

12

Sales and marketing is one area where we have increased our commitment to providing superior support and service. 

We have responded with initiatives that build awareness of the CI brand, and with a signifi cant expansion of events and 

communication efforts that deepen our connections to our clients. In 2012, these initiatives included:

   A national advertising campaign for CI Investments with commercials airing on television, radio and websites during the 

critical RRSP season. The commercials emphasized CI’s attributes of size, experience, expertise, and a strong product 

lineup  and  ended  with  the  message:  “CI  –  Canada’s  Investment  Company.”  With  the  success  of  this  initiative,  we 

instituted a similar campaign with even broader reach in early 2013. 

   Our  second  annual  Leadership  Forum,  a  three-day  conference  in  Las  Vegas  that  was  attended  by  approximately 

800 advisors. Our portfolio managers and CI employees provided extensive information about the markets and our 

investment products. We believe that the Leadership Forum has become one of the most highly regarded educational 

events in our industry and the 2013 edition is scheduled for October in Los Angeles.

  Three national roadshows, in which portfolio management teams presented to advisors in cities from coast to coast.
  Two digital roadshows, in which our portfolio managers participated in a full afternoon of webcast presentations.
   The  launch  of  the  Monthly  Review,  a  newsletter  for  advisors  that  contains  information  about  our  funds  in  an  eye-

catching newspaper format.

   Expanded  communications  between  our  portfolio  managers  and  advisors  through  online  platforms  such  as  podcasts, 

videocast and online presentations. And, in February 2013, Cambridge Advisors started CI’s fi rst portfolio managers’ blog. 

These efforts complement our more traditional written commentaries and in-person events such as dealer branch meetings. 
   The hiring of a highly qualifi ed wealth management expert to provide tax, estate planning and other wealth planning 

information to advisors.

OUTLOOK

In a recent report on the state of the investment fund industry, Investor Economics noted that fewer than half of the 

companies  in  our  industry  reported  positive  net  infl ows  in  2012.  Notably,  this  occurred  in  a  year  when  global  equity 

markets experienced double-digit returns and the Canadian fund industry as a whole reported approximately $30 billion 

in net sales. In fact, the research fi rm says, the percentage of companies in net redemptions increased to 54% from 38% 

over the past two years. 

13

Clearly, the divisions in our industry are growing ever larger as sales are increasingly concentrated with a smaller number 

of fi rms. CI has anticipated this and other trends highlighted by the Investor Economics report for over a decade and our 

strategic direction has ensured that CI remains an industry leader. As we described in this letter, we continue to build on 

our competitive advantages, which include:

   An exceptional portfolio management lineup
   Outstanding fund performance
  Economies of scale
   Financial strength
  Extensive and experienced sales and marketing operations
   Strong and diverse distribution relationships
   Increasing brand awareness
   An entrepreneurial corporate culture.

Our exceptional sales and asset growth in 2012 and the fi rst three months of 2013 is a testament to the validity of our 

long-term strategy and the strength of our position within the industry. CI has never been better equipped to compete. 

We are operating at a high level across all aspects of our business and providing incredible value to our clients. CI remains 

Canada’s premier independent wealth management company, and we see many opportunities for continued growth at 

your company.

In closing, we thank our employees and portfolio managers for their dedication, and our fund investors, advisors and our 

shareholders for their support.

Sincerely,

William T. Holland 

Chairman 

MARCH 31, 2013

Stephen A. MacPhail

President and Chief Executive Offi cer 

14

 
 
 
 
 
15

Ten-Year Historical Financial Highlights
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

( from continuing operations) 

Assets under management, end of year 
Assets under administration 
Total assets 

Net sales of funds 

Management fees  
Other income 
Total revenues 

Selling, general and administrative 
Trailer fees 
Other expenses 
Total expenses 

Income taxes 
Net income  
EBITDA* 

Earnings per share 
EBITDA* per share 
Dividends per share 

2012 

 75,723 
 23,199 
 98,922 

Years Ended Dec. 31

2011 

2010 

69,558  
21,544  
91,102  

 72,825  
 22,497  
 95,322  

2009

 64,226 
 21,489 
 85,715 

 973 

323  

 1,059  

 1,451 

 1,277.7 
 180.1 
 1,457.8 

 286.0 
 374.0 
 294.0 
 954.0 

 151.6 
 352.2 
 703.6 

 1.24 
 2.48 
 0.96 

1,302.8  
193.5  
1,496.3  

 1,193.0  
 186.7  
 1,379.7  

 1,041.5 
 177.0 
 1,218.5 

290.8  
379.5  
304.9  
975.2  

144.2  
376.9  
726.2  

1.31  
2.53  
0.89  

 263.6  
 346.2  
 295.4  
 905.2  

 146.0  
 328.6  
 669.7  

 1.14  
 2.32  
 0.77  

 278.9 
 299.7 
 298.4 
 877.0 

 45.3
 296.2 
 539.3 

 1.01 
 1.84 
 0.63 

Shareholders’ equity, end of year  
Shares outstanding, end of year  

 1,676.0 
 282,914,642 

1,620.2  
283,567,039  

 1,566.1  
 287,434,257  

 1,610.9 
 291,821,114 

*EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) is not a standardized earnings measure prescribed by IFRS; 
however, management believes that most of its shareholders, creditors, other stakeholders and investment analysts prefer to include 
the use of this performance measure in analyzing CI’s results. CI’s method of calculating this measure may not be comparable to similar 
measures presented by other companies.

TOTAL ASSETS ($ BILLIONS)
100

TOTAL REVENUES ($ MILLIONS)
2000

98.9

95.3

91.1

90.1 92.8

85.7

71.3

81.5

72.8

63.6

80

60

40

20

0

28.8

1,323.4

1,195.1

1,503.0

1,366.2

1,379.7

1,218.5

1,496.3

1,457.8

954.5

805.0

1500

1000

668.4

500

0

  ’03 

’04 
’05 
May 31 

’06 

’06† 

’07 

’08 

’09 
Dec. 31

’10 

’11 

’12 

  ’03 

’04 
’05 
May 31 

’06 

’06† 

’07 

’08 

’09 
Dec. 31

’10 

’11 

’12 

† Dec. 2006, seven month period.

† Dec. 2006, seven month period.

16

 
 
 
 
Years Ended Dec. 31 
2007 
2008 

Seven Months Ended 
Dec. 31, 2006 

Years Ended May 31 

2006 

2005 

2004 

2003

 52,801 
 18,449 
 71,250 

67,171  
25,657  
92,828  

 62,737  
 27,319  
 90,056  

 56,905  
 24,563  
 81,468  

 49,055  
 23,751  
 72,806  

 44,223  
 19,349  
 63,572  

 28,773  
 -   
 28,773 

 1,740 

1,898  

 437  

 3,111  

 1,717  

 898   

(596) 

 1,163.8 
 202.4 
 1,366.2 

1,292.7  
210.3  
1,503.0  

 256.4 
 336.1 
 340.0 
 932.5 

 (17.5) 
 451.2 
 638.6 

 1.62 
 2.29 
 1.74 

291.1  
369.1  
291.7  
951.9  

(54.4) 
605.5  
724.3  

2.15  
2.57  
2.25  

 693.8  
 111.2  
 805.0  

 147.8  
 193.3  
 140.3  
 481.4  

 (31.1) 
 354.7  
 403.5  

 1.25  
 1.42  
 1.155  

 1,110.0  
 213.4  
 1,323.4  

 994.6  
 200.5  
 1,195.1  

 353.6  
 291.0  
 204.2  
 848.8  

 165.6  
 309.0  
 577.4  

 1.08  
 2.02  
 0.70  

 328.1  
 250.7  
 168.3  
 747.1  

 163.2  
 284.7  
 529.5  

 0.97  
 1.81  
 0.675  

 820.7  
 133.8  
 954.5  

 256.8  
 197.8  
 108.1  
 562.7  

 170.7  
 221.0  
 442.2  

 0.82  
 1.65  
 0.405  

 595.8 
 72.6 
 668.4 

 203.3 
 147.4 
 197.8 
 548.5 

 49.0 
 71.0
 297.4 

 0.32
 1.32 
 0.29 

 1,601.7 
 292,492,805 

1,450.7  
281,514,003  

 1,371.1  
 280,132,687  

 1,545.0  
 285,680,519  

 1,472.8  
 286,643,091  

 1,533.9  
 295,199,027  

 632.7 
 235,525,648 

EARNINGS PER SHARE ($)
2.50

EBITDA* PER SHARE ($)
3.00

2.15

1.62

1.25

1.08

0.97

0.82

1.31

1.24

1.14

1.01

2.00

1.50

1.00

0.50

0.32

0

2.50

2.00

1.50

1.00

0.50

0

2.57

2.29

2.53

2.48

2.32

2.02

1.81

1.84

1.65

1.32

1.42

  ’03 

’04 
’05 
May 31 

’06 

’06† 

’07 

’08 

’09 
Dec. 31

’10 

’11 

’12 

  ’03 

’04 
’05 
May 31 

’06 

’06† 

’07 

’08 

’09 
Dec. 31

’10 

’11 

’12 

† Dec. 2006, seven month period.

† Dec. 2006, seven month period.

17

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Subsidiary Profi les

CI INVESTMENTS INC.

CI Investments is one of Canada’s largest investment management companies, with approximately $80 billion in assets 

under management (at March 31, 2013) on behalf of two million Canadians. We are known for our comprehensive and high-

quality selection of investment products and services, operational excellence and effi ciency, and a broad lineup of leading 

portfolio management teams. CI Investments has demonstrated a record of innovation and an ability to adapt to meet the 

changing demands of the marketplace and its clients.  

We partner with independent fi nancial advisors and third-party institutions in the distribution of our products and services, 

which include mutual funds, segregated funds, managed solutions, structured products and alternative investments. Our 

brands include CI, Harbour, Signature, Synergy, Cambridge, Black Creek, Red Sky, Portfolio Series, Portfolio Select Series, 

CI Private Investment Management, and SunWise Essential Series 2. In addition, we manage portfolio solutions under the 

United Financial brand, which are available through advisors with Assante Wealth Management. We service the institutional 

marketplace through a dedicated division, CI Institutional Asset Management.

CI’s strength is founded on the expertise and experience of its portfolio managers. Our managers, a mix of in-house teams 

and sub-advisors, represent the full spectrum of investment disciplines, from value to growth. Our in-house investment 

managers include: Signature Global Advisors, led by Eric Bushell; Harbour Advisors, led by Gerry Coleman and Stephen 

Jenkins; and Cambridge Advisors, led by Alan Radlo. CI and its managers have been recognized through 33 Morningstar 

Canadian Investment Awards over the past 10 years, including the prestigious Analysts’ Choice Investment Fund Company 

of the Year in 2006, 2007 and 2009, as well as Morningstar Fund Manager of the Decade in 2010 and Morningstar Fund 

Manager of the Year in 2009 for Mr. Bushell. Mr. Coleman is a two-time Fund Manager of the Year, receiving the award 

in 2001 and 2008. CI has also been the recipient of 46 Lipper Fund Awards, which recognize funds that have excelled in 

delivering consistently strong risk-adjusted performance relative to peers.

18

 
ASSANTE WEALTH MANAGEMENT (CANADA) LIMITED

Assante Wealth Management is a leading provider of fully integrated wealth management solutions for affl uent Canadians. 

With 750 advisors across Canada, our independent advisory network is one of the largest in the country. We serve over 

300,000 clients nationwide, administering $24 billion in assets (at March 31, 2013) on their behalf. 

The success of Assante is closely linked to our advisors and the strong partnership we have developed with them. Backed 

by  a  wealth  of  resources,  including  investment  analysts,  portfolio  managers,  tax  lawyers,  accountants,  estate  planning 

and  insurance  specialists  and  wealth  planners,  Assante  advisors  provide  a  comprehensive  and  integrated  approach  to 

wealth management. 

We also support our advisors by providing an industry-leading suite of products and solutions. This includes the United 

Financial brand of solutions, Evolution Private Managed Accounts and Optima Strategy, which are managed by CI Investments 

Inc. and are available exclusively through Assante advisors. For high net worth clients with more complex wealth planning 

needs, Assante offers the Private Client Managed Portfolios through the United Financial division of CI Private Counsel LP. 

Our services are offered through Assante Capital Management, an investment dealer, and Assante Financial Management, 

a mutual fund dealer, which together operate under the brand name Assante Wealth Management. Stonegate Private 

Counsel, a division of CI Private Counsel LP, is a group of experienced professionals who provide wealth planning and inter-

generational fi nancial services to high net worth individuals and families. 

19

Management’s 
Discussion and Analysis

December 31, 2012

CI Financial Corp.

20

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) dated February 14, 2013 presents an analysis of the fi nancial position 

of CI Financial Corp. and its subsidiaries (“CI”) as at December 31, 2012, compared with December 31, 2011, and the results 

of operations for the year ended and quarter ended December 31, 2012, compared with the year ended and quarter ended 

December 31, 2011 and the quarter ended September 30, 2012.

CI’s consolidated fi nancial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards 

(“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”). Amounts are expressed in Canadian dollars. The 

principal subsidiaries referenced herein include CI Investments Inc. (“CI Investments”) and Assante Wealth Management 

(Canada)  Ltd.  (“AWM”).  The  Asset  Management  segment  of  the  business  includes  the  operating  results  and  fi nancial 

position of CI Investments and its subsidiaries, including CI Private Counsel LP (“CIPC”). The Asset Administration segment 

includes the operating results and fi nancial position of AWM and its subsidiaries, including Assante Capital Management 

Ltd. (“ACM”) and Assante Financial Management Ltd. (“AFM”). 

This MD&A contains forward-looking statements concerning anticipated future events, results, circumstances, performance 

or expectations with respect to CI and its products and services, including its business operations, strategy and fi nancial 

performance and condition. When used in this MD&A, such statements use such words as “may”, “will”, “expect”, “believe”, 

and other similar terms. These statements are not historical facts but instead represent management beliefs regarding future 

events, many of which, by their nature are inherently uncertain and beyond management control. Although management 

believes  that  the  expectations  refl ected  in  such  forward-looking  statements  are  based  on  reasonable  assumptions,  such 

statements  involve  risks  and  uncertainties.  Factors  that  could  cause  actual  results  to  differ  materially  from  expectations 

include, among other things, general economic and market conditions, including interest and foreign exchange rates, global 

fi nancial  markets,  changes  in  government  regulations  or  in  tax  laws,  industry  competition,  technological  developments 

and other factors described under “Risk Factors” or discussed in other materials fi led with applicable securities regulatory 

authorities from time to time. The material factors and assumptions applied in reaching the conclusions contained in these 

forward-looking statements include that the investment fund industry will remain stable and that interest rates will remain 

relatively stable. The reader is cautioned against undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. For a more complete 

discussion of the risk factors that may impact actual results, please refer to the “Risk Factors” section of this MD&A and to 

the “Risk Factors” section of CI’s Annual Information Form which is available at www.sedar.com.

This MD&A includes several non-IFRS fi nancial measures that do not have any standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS 

and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. However, management believes that most 

shareholders, creditors, other stakeholders and investment analysts prefer to include the use of these fi nancial measures 

in analyzing CI’s results. These non-IFRS measures and reconciliations to IFRS, where necessary, are shown as highlighted 

footnotes to the discussion throughout the document.

21

TABLE 1:  SELECTED ANNUAL INFORMATION

(millions, except per share amounts) 

Total revenue 

Total expenses 

Income before income taxes 

Income taxes 

Net income 

Earnings per share 

Diluted earnings per share 

Dividends recorded per share 

FISCAL YEARS ENDING DECEMBER 31

2012 

2011 

2010

$1,457.8 

$1,496.3 

$1,379.7

954.0 

$503.8 

151.6 

$352.2 

$1.24 

$1.24 

$0.96 

975.2 

$521.1 

144.2 

$376.9 

$1.31 

$1.31 

$0.89 

905.1

$474.6

146.0

$328.6

$1.14

$1.13

$0.77

EBITDA (see Table 7) 

$703.6 

$726.2 

$669.7

Total assets 

Gross debt 

Net debt (gross debt less excess cash) 

Average shares outstanding 

Shares outstanding 

Share price 

Market capitalization 

$2,971.6 

$3,085.0 

$3,206.4

$594.4 

$526.5 

283.4 

282.9 

$24.93 

$7,053.1 

$780.4 

$730.7 

287.0 

283.6 

$21.10 

$5,983.3 

$870.4

$789.1

289.1

287.4

$22.50

$6,467.3

22

 
TABLE 2:  SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS 

(millions of dollars, except per share amounts) 

2012 

 2011

Q4 

Q3 

Q2 

Q1 

Q4 

Q3 

Q2  

Q1

INCOME STATEMENT DATA 

  Management fees 

  Administration fees 

  Other revenues 

  Total revenues 

325.8 

318.8 

313.5 

319.6 

312.1 

321.4 

337.3 

332.0

31.7 

13.8 

30.1 

12.6 

31.3 

14.0 

32.8 

13.8 

30.6 

14.0 

31.6 

14.4 

33.2 

15.0 

36.8

17.9

371.3 

361.5 

358.8 

366.2 

356.7 

367.4 

385.5 

386.7

  Selling, general & administrative 

  Trailer fees 

  Investment dealer fees 

  Amortization of deferred sales commissions 

  Interest expense 

  Other expenses 

  Total expenses 

73.2 

95.8 

24.7 

40.4 

6.2 

1.7 

69.9 

93.5 

23.3 

40.4 

6.3 

2.5 

70.7 

91.6 

24.5 

41.0 

6.1 

1.9 

72.2 

93.0 

25.8 

41.4 

6.3 

1.6 

70.2 

90.8 

23.8 

40.5 

6.8 

1.6 

72.2 

93.7 

24.8 

41.1 

7.0 

3.0 

75.1 

98.3 

26.0 

41.3 

6.7 

2.4 

73.3

96.6

29.1

41.4

7.0

2.5

242.0 

235.9 

235.8 

240.3 

233.7 

241.8 

249.8 

249.9

  Income before income taxes 

129.3 

125.6 

123.0 

125.9 

123.0 

125.6 

135.7 

136.8

  Income taxes 

  Net income 

Earnings per share 

Diluted earnings per share 

34.3 

95.0 

0.34 

0.34 

34.3 

91.3 

0.32 

0.32 

51.7 

71.3 

0.25 

0.25 

31.3 

94.6 

0.33 

0.33 

35.2 

87.8 

0.31 

0.31 

34.8 

90.8 

0.32 

0.31 

37.4 

98.3 

36.7

100.1

0.34 

0.34 

0.35

0.35

Dividends recorded per share  

0.240 

0.240 

0.240 

0.235 

0.225 

0.225 

0.225 

0.215

23

   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BUSINESS OVERVIEW

CI  is  a  diversifi ed  wealth  management  fi rm  and  one  of  Canada’s  largest  independent  investment  fund  companies.  The 

principal business of CI is the management, marketing, distribution and administration of mutual funds, segregated funds, 

structured  products  and  other  fee-earning  investment  products  for  Canadian  investors.  They  are  distributed  primarily 

through  brokers,  independent  fi nancial  planners  and  insurance  advisors,  including  ACM  and  AFM  fi nancial  advisors.  CI 

operates through two business segments, Asset Management and Asset Administration. The Asset Management segment 

provides  the  majority  of  CI’s  income  and  derives  its  revenue  principally  from  the  fees  earned  on  the  management  of 

several families of mutual, segregated, pooled and closed-end funds, structured products and discretionary accounts. The 

Asset Administration segment derives its revenue principally from commissions and fees earned on the sale of mutual 

funds and other fi nancial products and ongoing service to clients. 

BUSINESS STRATEGY 

CI  maximizes  shareholder  value  by  increasing  and  retaining  assets  under  management  and  assets  under  administration 

on which it earns an acceptable margin. Management believes this can be achieved by focusing on the following factors: 

quality and diversity of products offered by CI; experience and depth of investment managers; performance of the funds; 

service levels provided to dealers and investors; and the skill and knowledge of its employees. 

CI offers investors a wide range of Canadian and international investment products through a network of investment dealers, 

mutual fund dealers, and insurance agents, which include advisors with AWM and Sun Life Financial. Several acquisitions of 

fund management companies have allowed CI to offer investors what management believes to be the broadest selection of 

investment funds in the Canadian mutual fund industry, including the largest lineup of segregated funds.

CI uses three teams of in-house and 15 external investment managers to provide investment advice regarding the portfolios 

of the funds. These investment managers typically have long careers in the industry as well as extensive track records with 

CI. This lineup of investment managers provides a wide selection of styles and areas of expertise for CI’s funds. 

CI selects managers with a reputation for skilled investment management. CI has signifi cantly sized mandates available 

to attract the top talent in this fi eld. Many of CI’s investment managers have provided excellent long-term performance 

for our largest funds. However, CI can and will make changes to its investment managers when unsatisfactory investment 

performance has occurred.

CI is the manager of the funds and provides services that include managing or arranging for the management of investment 

portfolios, marketing of the funds, maintaining securityholders’ records and accounts, reporting to the securityholders 

and processing transactions relating to securities of the funds. CI has invested in information systems and internal training 

of staff to an extent which ensures it provides accurate and timely service to dealers and agents selling CI’s products and 

to investors.

24

Management of CI has the specialized skills and knowledge to focus on several key objectives. These include: meeting the 

needs of its clients, developing new products, enhancing investor awareness and increasing market share by marketing to 

investment dealers, mutual fund dealers and life insurance agents.

KEY PERFORMANCE DRIVERS   

CI’s results are driven primarily by the level of its assets under management, which are in turn driven by the returns earned 

by its funds and the net sales of its funds. The margin earned on these assets under management determines, to a large 

extent, CI’s profi tability.

The returns of each fund refl ect the returns of equities and bonds or other securities held by the fund. These returns will 

refl ect the returns of equity and bond indexes plus the over or under performance of the investment manager of each 

fund. In years when markets decline (such as 2008) CI’s assets will decline. Conversely, CI’s assets will appreciate in years 

when  markets  perform  well.  For  a  particular  period,  the  average  assets  under  management  will  drive  CI’s  results  as  CI 

receives the majority of its fees on a daily basis. 

Fund  sales  and  acquisitions  also  affect  CI’s  assets  under  management.  While  sales  results  help  increase  assets  under 

management, they are also an indicator of the level of demand for CI’s products and our success in delivering attractive 

products.

CI uses several performance indicators to assess its results. These are described throughout the results of operations and 

the discussion of the two operating segments and include the following: net income, earnings per share, pre-tax operating 

earnings, EBITDA, EBITDA margin, and dealer gross margin.

2012 OVERVIEW

CI’s average assets under management for 2012 increased 1% from 2011 as a result of the strong performance of CI’s funds 

and $973 million in net sales. However, a greater factor in CI’s performance this year was the continued trend of investor 

preference for fi xed income products, which generally carry a lower management fee. As well, a larger proportion of CI’s 

assets under management are now institutional mandates, which carry a lower management fee. The resulting change in 

asset mix reduced management fee revenues by 2% notwithstanding the increase in average assets under management.

This  was  mitigated  by  a  similar  impact  on  trailer  fee  expense,  which  fell  1%  year  over  year,  and  management’s  efforts 

to control spending in which selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses dropped 2% during the year. However, 

pre-tax operating earnings, as set out in Table 6, still declined 2% in 2012 versus 2011.

While markets in 2012 faced challenges, including lingering concerns over the European debt crisis, the slowing Chinese 

economy, and the U.S. “fi scal cliff,” volatility eventually subsided and investors responded. Industry gross sales of funds 

picked up in 2012 and CI’s gross sales increased 16% year over year and net sales increased 201% year over year. 

25

CI continued to be the third-largest investment fund company in Canada with assets under management of $75.7 billion at 

December 31, 2012. CI’s market share is approximately 9%.

According  to  Morningstar,  CI  led  the  entire  industry  with  the  most  four  and  fi ve-star  rated  funds  (including  multiple 

versions) for all of 2012 and has ranked either fi rst or second place for the past 10 years. In addition, CI and its own portfolio 

managers have won 47 Canadian Investment Awards since 1998 and 39 Lipper Awards since 2007.

KEY EVENTS

In  February,  CI  announced  that  it  had  acquired  a  signifi cant  minority  stake  in  Lawrence  Park  Capital  Partners  Ltd.,  an 

alternative asset manager focusing on fi xed-income and credit strategies. This relationship is part of CI’s strategy to seek 

selected growth opportunities in the alternative asset management space.

In May, CI held its second annual sales conference, a four-day event attended by over 800 leading investment advisors.  

This was an opportunity for advisors to watch presentations and participate in discussions covering economic and fi nancial 

issues,  and  to  learn  more  about  CI’s  investment  products.  CI’s  sales  team,  senior  management  and  several  portfolio 

managers presented their outlooks, opinions and strategies to these key distributors of CI’s funds.

CI introduced several new products during the year as it continued its strategy to provide a broad shelf of products to 

its clients and their fi nancial advisors. In January, CI partnered with Sun Life Financial to enhance the SunWise Essential 

Series  segregated  fund  program  which  includes  an  option  to  receive  guaranteed  income  for  life  as  early  as  age  55.  CI 

Private Investment Management was also added to the program in order to meet the needs of higher net worth investors. 

In October, the institutional division of CI Investments announced the offering of CI LifeCycle Portfolios, a multi-asset 

class,  multi-manager  program  of  seven  target  date  retirement  funds  that  is  designed  to  service  pension  plan  sponsors 

and members. 

CI continued to expand its in-house portfolio management teams, particularly within the Cambridge team, adding three 

new members and the Signature team, adding four new members during the year. This expansion of internal portfolio 

management expertise should be viewed in conjunction with the move to reduce the number of external sub-advisory 

mandates that have been inherited as part of previous asset management company acquisitions. These changes are made 

to improve performance of the funds as well as to reduce SG&A expenses over the long term.

26

ASSETS AND SALES

Total  assets,  which  include  mutual,  segregated  and  hedge  funds,  separately  managed  accounts,  structured  products, 

pooled assets and assets under administration were $98.9 billion at December 31, 2012, an increase of 9% from $91.1 billion 

at December 31, 2011. As shown in Table 3, these assets consisted of $75.7 billion in assets under management and $23.2 

billion  in  assets  under  administration  at  December  31,  2012,  which  increased  9%  and  8%,  respectively  during  the  year, 

primarily due to market performance.

TABLE 3: TOTAL ASSETS

(in billions) 

Dec. 31, 2012 

Dec. 31, 2011 

% change

As at 

As at

Assets under management 

Assets under administration* 

Total assets under management 

$75.7 

23.2 

$98.9 

$69.6 

21.5 

$91.1 

9

8

9

*Includes $10.9 billion and $9.8 billion of managed assets in CI and United funds in 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Assets under management form the majority of CI’s total assets and provide most of its revenue and net income. The 

change in assets under management during each of the past two years is detailed in Table 4. Gross sales increased in 2012 

as CI won additional institutional mandates and strong fund performance led to higher retail sales.

TABLE 4: CHANGE IN ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT

(in billions) 

Assets under management at January 1 

  Gross sales 

  Redemptions 

  Net sales 

  Market performance 

2012 

2011

$69.6 

$72.8

10.6 

9.6 

1.0 

5.1 

9.1

8.8

0.3

(3.5)

Assets under management at December 31 

$75.7 

$69.6

Average assets under management for the year 

$72.6 

$72.2

27

 
Table 5 sets out the levels and changes in CI’s average assets under management and the gross and net sales for the relevant 

periods. As most of CI’s revenues and expenses are based on assets throughout the year, average asset levels are critical 

to the analysis of CI’s fi nancial results.

TABLE 5: CHANGE IN AVERAGE ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT

(in billions) 

Quarter ended 

Quarter ended 

Quarter ended

Dec. 31, 2012 

Sept. 30, 2012 

Dec. 31, 2011

Average assets under management for the quarter 

$74.323 

Change to December 31, 2012 

$72.437 

2.6% 

$69.349

7.2%

Gross sales 

Net sales 

$3.5 

$0.7 

$2.4 

$0.4 

$1.7

($0.4)

The Investment Funds Institute of Canada (IFIC) reported $30.4 billion in industry net sales of mutual funds for the year 

ended December 31, 2012, up $9.2 billion from net sales of $21.2 billion in the same period for 2011. Total industry assets as 

reported by IFIC at December 31, 2012 of $849.7 billion were up 10% from $769.7 billion at December 31, 2011.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012

For the year ended December 31, 2012, CI reported net income of $352.2 million ($1.24 per share) versus $376.9 million ($1.31 

per share) for the year ended December 31, 2011. Included in 2011 was $4.9 million ($3.5 million after-tax) in revenue from an 

insurance settlement and 2012 included an $18.8 million non-cash future tax provision. Adjusting for these items, the year-

over-year decline in net income was only $2.4 million, or less than 1%.

CI’s pre-tax operating earnings, as set out in Table 6, adjust for the impact of gains and losses on marketable securities, 

performance fees and non-recurring items. Redemption fee revenue and the amortization of deferred sales commissions 

and fund contracts are netted out to remove the impact of fi nancing back-end assets under management. Pre-tax operating 

earnings were $641.5 million in 2012, a decrease of 2% from 2011, refl ecting the decline in management fee revenue as a 

result of the change in asset mix toward fi xed-income products.

In 2012, CI recorded $151.6 million in income tax expense for an effective tax rate of 30.1%. In the second quarter of 2012, 

CI recorded a non-cash future income tax provision of $18.8 million. Adjusting for this, CI’s effective tax rate for 2012 was 

26.4%, compared to an effective tax rate of 27.7% in 2011. CI’s statutory rate for 2012 was 26.5% versus 28.2% in 2011. 

For the year ended December 31, 2012, redemption fee revenue was $27.4 million compared with $28.6 million for the year 

ended December 31, 2011. The decrease is a result of a decline in redemptions of deferred load funds that are subject to 

redemption fees.

28

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other income for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $26.7 million compared to $32.6 million in the prior year. The 

decline was primarily due to the non-recurring $4.9 million in insurance proceeds received in 2011. 

Amortization of deferred sales commissions and fund contracts was $165.4 million in 2012, a decrease from $166.7 million 

in 2011. This represents the average amount of deferred sales commissions paid in the last seven years plus a small amount 

of accelerated amortization as deferred load units are redeemed ahead of their seven-year scheduled term. The level of 

spending on deferred sales commissions has declined from that of the prior year.

Interest expense of $24.9 million was recorded for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared with $27.5 million for the 

year ended December 31, 2011. The decrease in interest expense refl ects lower average debt levels during 2012, as discussed 

under “Liquidity and Capital Resources.” 

Other expenses for the year ended December 31, 2012 were $5.3 million compared to $6.9 million in the prior year. The 

decline from the prior year is primarily a result of the elimination of capital taxes payable by CI mid-way through 2011.

As illustrated in Table 7, EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $703.6 million ($2.48 per share) compared with 

$726.2 million ($2.53 per share) for the year ended December 31, 2011. The 3% decline is consistent with the above discussion 

on pre-tax operating earnings. EBITDA as a percentage of total revenues (EBITDA margin) for 2012 was 48.3%, consistent 

with that of 2011.

TABLE 6: PRE-TAX OPERATING EARNINGS

CI uses pre-tax operating earnings to assess its underlying profi tability. CI defi nes pre-tax operating earnings as income 

before  income  taxes  less  redemption  fee  revenue,  non-recurring  items,  performance  fees  and  investment  gains,  plus 

amortization of deferred sales commissions (DSC) and fund contracts.

(in millions, except per share amounts) 

Dec. 31, 2012 

Sept. 30, 2012  Dec. 31, 2011 

Dec. 31, 2012 

Dec. 31, 2011

Quarter ended  Quarter ended  Quarter ended 

Year ended  

Year ended

Income before income taxes 

$129.3 

$125.6 

$123.0 

$503.8 

$521.1

Less: 

  Redemption fees  

  Non-recurring item(s)  

  Gain (loss) on marketable securities 

Add: 

  Amortization of DSC and fund contracts  

Pre-tax operating earnings 

  per share 

6.1 

– 

0.1 

40.9 

$164.0 

$0.58 

6.5 

– 

– 

40.9 

$160.0 

$0.56 

6.9 

– 

(0.1) 

41.1 

$157.3 

$0.55 

27.4 

– 

0.3 

165.4 

$641.5 

$2.26 

28.6

4.9

(0.5)

166.7

$654.8

$2.28

29

    
 
 
 
 
 
QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012 

For the quarter ended December 31, 2012, CI reported net income of $95.0 million ($0.34 per share) versus $87.8 million 

($0.31  per  share)  for  the  quarter  ended  December  31,  2011  and  $91.3  million  ($0.32  per  share)  for  the  quarter  ended 

September 30, 2012. Average assets under management for the fourth quarter of 2012 were up 2.6% from the level of 

the third quarter and 7.2% from the fourth quarter of 2011. 

Pre-tax operating earnings were $164.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2012, an increase of 4% from $157.3 million in the 

fourth quarter of 2011 and 2% higher than the $160.0 million in the prior quarter. These increases refl ect the change in 

assets under management as well as the change in asset mix, which reduced management fee revenues.

For  the  fourth  quarter  of  2012,  CI  recorded  $34.3  million  in  income  tax  expense  for  an  effective  tax  rate  of  26.5%, 

compared to $35.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2011 for an effective tax rate of 28.6%. The third quarter of 2012 

included  $34.3  million  in  income  tax  expense,  for  an  effective  tax  rate  of  27.3%.  The  decrease  in  the  year  over  year 

effective tax rates refl ects the decrease in statutory tax rates.

For the quarter ended December 31, 2012, redemption fee revenue was $6.1 million compared with $6.9 million for the 

quarter ended December 31, 2011 and $6.5 million from the quarter ended September 30, 2012. The decrease from these 

prior periods relates to a decrease in redemptions from deferred load funds.

TABLE 7: EBITDA AND EBITDA MARGIN

CI  uses  EBITDA  (earnings  before  interest,  taxes,  depreciation  and  amortization)  to  assess  its  underlying  profi tability  prior 

to the impact of its fi nancing structure, income taxes and the amortization of deferred sales commissions, fund contracts 

and capital assets. This also permits comparisons of companies within the industry, before any distortion caused by different 

fi nancing methods, levels of taxation and mix of business between front-end and back-end sales commission assets under 

management. EBITDA is a measure of operating performance, a facilitator for valuation and a proxy for cash fl ow.

(in millions, except per share amounts) 

Dec. 31, 2012 

Sept. 30, 2012 

Dec. 31, 2011 

Dec. 31, 2012 

Dec. 31, 2011

Quarter ended  Quarter ended  Quarter ended 

Year ended  

Year ended

Net income 

Add (deduct): 

Interest expense  

Income tax expense 

  Amortization of DSC and fund contracts 

  Amortization of other items 

EBITDA 

  per share 

EBITDA margin (as a % of revenue) 

$95.0 

$91.3 

$87.8 

$352.2 

$376.9

6.2 

34.3 

40.9 

2.4 

$178.8 

$0.63 

48.2% 

6.3 

34.3 

40.9 

2.4 

$175.2 

$0.62 

48.5% 

6.8 

35.2 

41.1 

2.7 

$173.6 

$0.61 

48.7% 

24.9 

151.6 

165.4 

9.5 

$703.6 

$2.48 

48.3% 

27.5

144.2

166.7

10.9

$726.2

$2.53

48.5%

30

    
 
 
Amortization  of  deferred  sales  commissions  and  fund  contracts  was  $40.9  million  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2012,  a 

decrease from $41.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2011 and unchanged from the third quarter of 2012. The trend of lower 

amortization expense is consistent with the trend in lower spending on deferred sales commissions in recent years.

Interest expense of $6.2 million was recorded for the quarter ended December 31, 2012 compared with $6.8 million for 

the quarter ended December 31, 2011 and $6.3 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2012. As mentioned earlier, 

the decrease in interest expense from the prior year period refl ected lower average debt levels, as discussed under 

“Liquidity and Capital Resources.” 

As illustrated in Table 7, EBITDA for the quarter ended December 31, 2012 was $178.8 million ($0.63 per share) compared 

with $173.6 million ($0.61 per share) for the quarter ended December 31, 2011 and $175.2 million ($0.62 per share) for the 

quarter ended September 30, 2012. The 3% year-over-year increase in quarterly EBITDA refl ects the increase in average 

assets under management offset by the effect of the change in asset mix. EBITDA as a percentage of total revenues 

(EBITDA margin) for the fourth quarter of 2012 was 48.2%, down slightly from 48.7% in the last quarter of 2011 and 48.5% 

in the prior quarter.

ASSET MANAGEMENT SEGMENT

The  Asset  Management  segment  is  CI’s  principal  business  segment  and  includes  the  operating  results  and  fi nancial 

position of CI Investments and CIPC.

TABLE 8: RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – ASSET MANAGEMENT SEGMENT

The following table presents the operating results for the Asset Management segment:

(in millions) 

Dec. 31, 2012 

Sept. 30, 2012 

Dec. 31, 2011 

Dec. 31, 2012 

Dec. 31, 2011

Quarter ended  Quarter ended  Quarter ended 

Year ended 

Year ended

Management fees 

Other revenue 

Total revenue  

Selling, general and administrative 

Trailer fees 

Amortization of deferred sales commissions 

  and fund contracts 

Other expenses 

Total expenses 

Income before taxes 

$325.8 

10.1 

$335.9 

$59.6 

99.7 

41.6 

0.3 

$318.8 

9.0 

$327.8 

$57.7 

97.4 

41.6 

1.1 

$312.1 

10.2 

$322.3 

$57.3 

94.3 

41.8 

0.8 

$201.2 

$197.8 

$194.2 

$1,277.7 

$1,302.8

39.0 

45.5

$1,316.7 

$1,348.3

$233.3 

389.1 

168.1 

2.0 

$792.5 

$235.9

394.1

169.7

4.1

$803.8

  and non-segmented items 

$134.7 

$130.0 

$128.1 

$524.2 

$544.5

31

    
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012 

Revenues

Revenues from management fees were $1,278 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, a decrease of 2% from $1,303 

million for the year ended December 31, 2011. While average assets under management were up 1% year over year, the 

change in asset mix toward fi xed-income products and institutional mandates reduced the average management fee rate 

in 2012 to 1.760% from 1.805% in 2011. 

For the year ended December 31, 2012, other revenue was $39.0 million versus $45.5 million for the year ended December 31, 

2011. The largest component of other revenue is redemption fees. Redemption fees were $27.4 million for 2012 compared 

with $28.6 million for 2011. The prior year also included $4.9 million in proceeds from an insurance settlement.

Expenses

SG&A expenses for the Asset Management segment were $233.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, a decrease 

from $235.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. As a percentage of average assets under management, SG&A 

expenses were 0.321% in 2012 and 0.327% in 2011, as spending declined 1.1% and average assets were up 0.6%. Although 

spending  was  increased  on  certain  product  initiatives  and  on  in-house  portfolio  management  teams,  offsetting  cost 

savings were found in other areas of the business.

Trailer fees were $389.1 million for 2012 compared with $394.1 million for 2011. Net of inter-segment amounts, this expense 

was $374.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 versus $379.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The 

decline in trailer fee expense is a result of the change in asset mix, as lower trailer fees are paid on fi xed-income products 

compared to equity products, and institutional funds where trailers are typically not paid.

Amortization of deferred sales commissions and fund contracts was $168.1 million for 2012, down from $169.7 million for 

the prior year. This change is consistent with the change in deferred sales commissions paid in recent years and the amount 

of accelerated amortization related to redemptions of deferred load funds.

Other  expenses  were  $2.0  million  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2012  compared  to  $4.1  million  in  the  year  ended 

December 31, 2011. The decline in these expenses is primarily due to the legislated elimination of capital taxes on CI in 2011. 

Income  before  income  taxes  and  interest  expense  for  CI’s  principal  segment  was  $524.2  million  for  2012,  compared 

with $544.5 million in 2011. The decrease from the prior year is primarily due to the change in asset mix which reduced 

management fee revenue.

32

QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012 

Revenues

Revenues from management fees were $325.8 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2012, an increase of 4% from 

$312.1 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2011 and 2% from $318.8 million for the quarter ended September 30, 

2012. The changes were mainly attributable to increases in average assets under management, which were up 7.2% and up 

2.6% from the quarters ended December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2012, respectively. The average management fee rate 

declined from 1.786% in the fourth quarter of 2011 to 1.751% in the third quarter of 2012 and to 1.744% in the fourth quarter 

of 2012, again as a result of the change in asset mix.

For  the  quarter  ended  December  31,  2012,  other  revenue  was  $10.1  million  versus  $10.2  million  and  $9.0  million  for  the 

quarters  ended  December  31,  2011  and  September  30,  2012,  respectively.  The  largest  component  of  other  revenue  is 

redemption fees, which were $6.1 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2012 compared with $6.9 million and $6.5 

million for the quarters ended December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2012, respectively.

Expenses

SG&A expenses for the Asset Management segment were $59.6 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2012, an increase 

from $57.3 million for the fourth quarter in 2011 and from $57.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2012. As a 

percentage of average assets under management, SG&A expenses were 0.319% for the quarter ended December 31, 2012, 

down from 0.328% for the quarter ended December 31, 2011 and up slightly from 0.317% for the quarter ended September 

30, 2012. Generally, the decrease in this rate over time results from CI’s ongoing drive to fi nd operating effi ciencies in its 

fi xed costs, which account for a large proportion of CI’s total costs. At the same time, in any given quarter, management 

may choose to increase or decrease discretionary spending.  

Trailer fees were $99.7 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2012 compared with $94.3 million for the quarter ended 

December 31, 2011 and $97.4 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2012. Net of inter-segment amounts, this expense 

was $95.8 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2012 versus $90.8 million for the fourth quarter of 2011 and $93.5 

million for the third quarter of 2012. The increase from the comparable periods is primarily due to the respective increases 

in average assets under management, tempered by the changes in asset mix.

Amortization of deferred sales commissions and fund contracts, before intersegment eliminations, was $41.6 million for 

the  quarter  ended  December  31,  2012,  down  from  $41.8  million  in  the  same  quarter  last  year  and  unchanged  from  the 

previous quarter. This decrease is consistent with the decrease in deferred sales commissions paid in the past several years.

Income  before  income  taxes  and  interest  expense  for  CI’s  principal  segment  was  $134.7  million  for  the  quarter  ended 

December  31,  2012  compared  with  $128.1  million  in  the  same  period  in  2011  and  $130.0  million  in  the  previous  quarter. 

Income has generally increased in line with the increase in average assets under management over the comparable periods.

33

ASSET ADMINISTRATION SEGMENT

The Asset Administration segment includes the operating results and fi nancial position of AWM and its subsidiaries.

TABLE 9: RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – ASSET ADMINISTRATION SEGMENT

The following table presents the operating results for the Asset Administration segment:

(in millions) 

Dec. 31, 2012 

Sept. 30, 2012 

Dec. 31, 2011 

Dec. 31, 2012 

Dec. 31, 2011

Quarter ended  Quarter ended  Quarter ended 

Year ended 

Year ended

Administration fees 

Other revenue 

Total revenue  

Selling, general and administrative 

Investment dealer fees 

Amortization of fund contracts 

Other expenses 

Total expenses 

Income before taxes 

$55.2 

3.7 

$58.9 

$13.6 

43.6 

0.4 

0.8 

$58.4 

$52.6 

3.6 

$56.2 

$12.3 

41.3 

0.4 

0.8 

$54.8 

$52.5 

3.8 

$56.3 

$12.9 

41.5 

0.4 

0.2 

$220.7 

15.0 

$235.7 

$52.7 

174.5 

1.6 

3.2 

$226.2

15.6

$241.8

$54.8

179.5

1.5

2.8

$55.0 

$232.0 

$238.6

  and non-segmented items 

$0.5 

$1.4 

$1.3 

$3.7 

$3.2

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012 

Revenues

Administration fees are earned on assets under administration in the AWM business and from the administration of third-

party business. These fees were $220.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, a decrease of 2% from $226.2 million for 

the same period last year. Net of inter-segment amounts, administration fee revenue was $126.0 million for the year ended 

December 31, 2012, down from $132.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The decrease from the prior year is a 

result of lower commission revenue earned on the sale of mutual funds and other securities. Administration fees should be 

considered in conjunction with investment dealer fees, an expense that represents the payout to fi nancial advisors.

Other  revenues  earned  by  the  Asset  Administration  segment  are  generally  derived  from  non-advisor  related  activities. 

For 2012, other revenues were $15.0 million, decreasing slightly from $15.6 million for 2011.

34

    
Expenses

Investment dealer fees represent the payout to advisors on revenues they generate and were $174.5 million for the year 

ended December 31, 2012, compared to $179.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The decrease in these fees 

relates directly to the decrease in administration fee revenues discussed above.

As detailed in Table 10, dealer gross margin was $46.2 million or 21.0% of administration fee revenue for 2012, compared 

to  $46.7  million  or  20.6%  for  2011.  The  change  in  gross  margin  from  the  prior  period  relates  to  the  change  in  average 

investment dealer fees paid out to fi nancial advisors on their administration fees. Generally, as an advisor’s assets under 

administration  and  administration  fee  revenues  grow,  the  payout  rates  to  the  respective  advisor  will  correspondingly 

increase up to a maximum payout rate.

SG&A expenses for the segment were $52.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to $54.8 million in the 

year ended December 31, 2011. The level of discretionary spending decreased during 2012 compared to 2011.  

The Asset Administration segment had income before income taxes and non-segmented items of $3.7 million for 2012, up 

from $3.2 million in 2011. This increase is a result of the decline in SG&A spend and dealer gross margin rose slightly year 

over year.

TABLE 10: DEALER GROSS MARGIN

CI  monitors  its  operating  profi tability  on  the  revenues  earned  within  its  Asset  Administration  segment  by  measuring  the 

dealer gross margin, which is calculated as administration fee revenue less investment dealer fees, divided by administration 

fee revenue. CI uses this measure to assess the margin remaining after the payout to advisors.

(in millions) 

Dec. 31, 2012 

Sept. 30, 2012 

Dec. 31, 2011 

Dec. 31, 2012 

Dec. 31, 2011

Quarter ended  Quarter ended  Quarter ended 

Year ended  

Year ended

Administration fees 

Less:

$55.2 

$52.6 

$52.5 

$220.7 

$226.2

  Investment dealer fees  

43.6 

41.3 

41.5 

174.5 

179.5

Dealer gross margin 

$11.6 

21.1% 

$11.3 

21.4% 

$11.0 

21.0% 

$46.2 

21.0% 

$46.7

20.6%

35

    
 
 
QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012 

Revenues

Administration fees were $55.2 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2012, an increase of 5% from $52.5 million for the 

same period last year and an increase of 5% from the prior quarter. Net of inter-segment amounts, administration fee revenue 

was $31.7 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2012, up from $30.6 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2011 and 

from $30.1 million in the previous quarter. The increase from the prior year was primarily attributable to an increase in assets 

under administration during the fourth quarter of 2012 leading to higher trailer commissions earned.

As mentioned above, other revenues earned by the Asset Administration segment are mainly comprised of non-advisor 

related activities. For the quarter ended December 31, 2012, other revenues were $3.7 million, down from $3.8 million for 

the fourth quarter of 2011 and up from $3.6 million in the third quarter of 2012.

Expenses

Investment  dealer  fees  were  $43.6  million  for  the  quarter  ended  December  31,  2012,  compared  to  $41.5  million  for  the 

fourth quarter of 2012 and $41.3 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2012. 

As detailed in Table 10, dealer gross margin was $11.6 million or 21.1% of administration fee revenue for the quarter ended 

December  31,  2012  compared  to  $11.0  million  or  21.0%  for  the  fourth  quarter  of  2011  and  $11.3  million  or  21.4%  for  the 

previous quarter. The changes in gross margin from the comparable quarters correspond to the level of payout to fi nancial 

advisors on their 12-month rolling administration fee revenues.

SG&A expenses for the segment were $13.6 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2012 compared to $12.9 million in 

the fourth quarter of 2011 and $12.3 million in the third quarter of 2012, as the spending on marketing initiatives increased 

during the quarter.

The  Asset  Administration  segment  had  income  before  income  taxes  and  non-segmented  items  of  $0.5  million  for  the 

quarter ended December 31, 2012, down from $1.3 million for the fourth quarter of 2011 and from $1.4 million for the prior 

quarter. The decline in the fourth quarter of 2012 was due to the increase in SG&A expenses exceeding the increase in 

gross margin.  

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

As  detailed  in  Table  11,  CI  generated  $548.1  million  of  operating  cash  fl ow  in  the  year  ended  December  31,  2012  down 

$26.6 million from $574.7 million in 2011. CI measures its operating cash fl ow before the change in working capital and the 

actual cash amount paid for interest and income taxes, as these items often distort the cash fl ow generated during the 

period. Working capital is affected by seasonality, interest is primarily paid semi-annually, and tax instalments paid may 

differ materially from the cash tax accrual. CI’s main uses of capital are the fi nancing of deferred sales commissions, the 

payment of dividends on its shares, the funding of capital expenditures and the repurchase of shares through its normal 

course issuer bid program. At current levels of cash fl ow and anticipated dividend payout rates, CI produces suffi cient 

cash to meet its obligations and pay down debt.

36

TABLE 11: SUMMARY OF CASH FLOWS

(in millions) 

Operating Cash Flow 

Less:  

  Deferred sales commission paid 

  Marketable securities, net 

  Capital expenditures 

  Share repurchases 

  Dividends paid 

  Debt repaid 

  Working capital and other 

Net change in cash 

Cash at January 1 

Cash at December 31 

Year ended 

Year ended

Dec. 31, 2012 

Dec. 31, 2011

$548.1 

$574.7

 124.2  

 21.5  

 5.6  

 30.5  

 269.2  

 187.0  

 8.6  

646.6  

 (98.5) 

 122.6  

 $24.1  

 141.2 

11.6 

21.5 

95.2 

254.2 

90.9 

 54.0 

668.6

(93.9)

216.5 

$122.6 

CI paid sales commissions of $124.2 million in 2012 compared to $141.2 million in 2011. The decrease in sales commissions 

from the prior year is consistent with the trend to lower sales of deferred load funds.

CI invested $26.8 million in marketable securities in 2012. During the same period, CI received proceeds of $5.3 million 

from the disposition of marketable securities, resulting in a gain of $0.3 million. The fair value of marketable securities 

at December 31, 2012 was $66.2 million. Marketable securities are comprised of seed capital investments in its funds and 

strategic investments.

During the year ended December 31, 2012, CI incurred capital expenditures of $5.6 million, primarily relating to leasehold 

improvements and investments in technology.  

During the year, CI repurchased 1.4 million shares at a cost of $30.5 million under its normal course issuer bid. CI declared 

dividends of $271.9 million ($269.2 million paid), which was less than net income for the year by $80.3 million. At year end, 

CI’s dividend payments were $0.08 per share per month, or approximately $272 million per fi scal year.

The statement of fi nancial position for CI at December 31, 2012 refl ects total assets of $2.972 billion, a decrease of $113.0 

million from $3.085 billion at December 31, 2011. This change can be attributed to a decrease in current assets of $71.2 

million and a decrease in long-term assets of $42.2 million. 

CI’s  cash  and  cash  equivalents  decreased  by  $98.4  million  in  2012  primarily  due  to  the  repayment  of  a  debenture  that 

matured on December 17, 2012. Marketable securities increased by $24.1 million due to a $20.0 million investment along 

with some smaller investments. Accounts receivable and prepaid expenses remain relatively unchanged at $70.6 million 

compared to $70.2 million. 

37

 
 
 
 
 
 
Deferred  sales  commissions  decreased  $38.9  million  to  $452.3  million  as  a  result  of  the  $163.1  million  in  amortization 

expense offset by the $124.2 million in sales commissions paid. Capital assets decreased $2.7 million during the year as a 

result of $8.3 million amortized during the year offset by $5.6 million in capital additions.  

Total liabilities decreased by $169.2 million during 2012 to $1.296 billion at December 31, 2012. The primary contributors to 

this change were a $186.0 million decrease in long-term debt offset by a $17.8 million increase in future income taxes. The 

increase in future income taxes relates to the Ontario government’s decision to rescind previously legislated reductions 

in corporate tax rates.    

On December 17, 2012, CI repaid $250 million of debentures that matured. At December 31, 2012, CI had $500 million in 

outstanding debentures at an average interest rate of 3.51% with a carrying value of $498.4 million. In addition, CI had 

$96.0 million drawn against its credit facility at an average rate of 1.83%. At December 31, 2011, CI had $780.4 million of 

debt outstanding at an average rate of 3.19%. Net of cash and marketable securities, debt was $504.1 million at December 

31, 2012, down from $615.7 million at December 31, 2011. The average debt level for the year ended December 31, 2012 was 

approximately $749 million, compared to $848 million for 2011. 

As  mentioned  earlier,  at  December  31,  2012  CI  had  drawn  $96.0  million  against  its  $250  million  credit  facility.  Principal 

repayments on any drawn amounts are only required should the bank decide not to renew the facility on its anniversary, 

in which case 6.25% of the principal would be repaid at each calendar quarter-end, with the balance payable at the end 

of the credit facility term (March 14, 2015). These payments would be payable beginning March 31, 2013 should the bank 

not renew the facility.  

CI’s current ratio of debt (net of excess cash) to EBITDA is at 0.7 to 1, well below CI’s long-term target of 1 to 1. CI expects 

that, absent acquisitions in which debt is increased, excess cash fl ow will be used to pay down debt and the ratio of debt 

to EBITDA will trend lower. CI is within its fi nancial covenants with respect to its credit facility, which requires that the 

debt-to-EBITDA ratio remain below 2.5 to 1, and assets under management not fall below $40 billion, based on a rolling 

30-day average.

Shareholders’  equity  increased  by  $55.8  million  in  2012  to  $1.676  billion  at  December  31,  2012  which  approximates  net 

income less dividends and share repurchases.

RISK MANAGEMENT

There is risk inherent in the conduct of a wealth management business. Some factors which introduce or exacerbate risk 

are within the control of management and others are by their nature outside of direct control but must still be managed.  

Effective risk management is a key component to achieving CI’s business objectives. It requires management to identify 

and  anticipate  risks  in  order  to  develop  strategies  and  procedures  which  minimize  or  avoid  negative  consequences.  

Management  has  developed  an  approach  to  risk  management  that  involves  executives  in  each  core  business  unit  and 

operating area of CI. These executives identify and evaluate risks, applying both a quantitative and a qualitative analysis 

and then assess the likelihood of occurrence of a particular risk. The fi nal step in the process is to identify mitigating 

factors or strategies and a course for implementing mitigation procedures.  

38

The disclosures below provide a summary of the key risks and uncertainties that affect CI’s fi nancial performance. For a 

more complete discussion of the risk factors which may adversely impact CI’s business, please refer to the “Risk Factors” 

section of CI’s Annual Information Form, which is available at www.sedar.com.

MARKET RISK 

Market risk is the risk of a fi nancial loss resulting from adverse changes in underlying market factors, such as interest rates, foreign 

exchange rates, and equity and commodity prices. A description of each component of market risk is described below:

 Interest rate risk is the risk of gain or loss due to the volatility of interest rates.   
 Foreign exchange rate risk is the risk of gain or loss due to volatility of foreign exchange rates.
  Equity risk is the risk of gain or loss due to the changes in prices and volatility of individual equity instruments 

and equity indexes.

CI’s  fi nancial  performance  is  indirectly  exposed  to  market  risk.  Any  decline  in  fi nancial  markets  or  lack  of  sustained 

growth in such markets may result in a corresponding decline in performance and may adversely affect CI’s assets under 

management, management fees and revenues, which would reduce cash fl ow to CI and ultimately impact CI’s ability to 

pay dividends.

Asset Management Segment 

CI is subject to market risk throughout its Asset Management business segment. The following is a description of how CI 

mitigates the impact this risk has on its fi nancial position and operating earnings. 

Management of market risk within CI’s assets under management is the responsibility of the Chief Operating Offi cer, with 

the assistance of the Chief Compliance Offi cer. CI has a control environment that ensures risks are reviewed regularly and 

that risk controls throughout CI are operating in accordance with regulatory requirements. CI’s compliance group carefully 

reviews the exposure to interest rate risk, foreign currency risk and equity risk. When a particular market risk is identifi ed, 

portfolio managers of the funds are directed to mitigate the risk by reducing their exposure.

At December 31, 2012, approximately 26% of CI’s assets under management were held in fi xed-income securities, which 

are exposed to interest rate risk. An increase in interest rates causes market prices of fi xed-income securities to fall, while 

a decrease in interest rates causes market prices to rise. CI estimates that a 50 basis point change in the value of these 

securities would cause a change of about $1 million in annual pre-tax earnings in the Asset Management segment. 

At December 31, 2012, about 65% of CI’s assets under management were based in Canadian currency, which diminishes the 

exposure to foreign exchange risk. However, at the same time, approximately 20% of CI’s assets under management were 

based in U.S. currency. Any change in the value of the Canadian dollar relative to U.S. currency will cause fl uctuations 

in  CI’s  assets  under  management  upon  which  CI’s  management  fees  are  calculated.  CI  estimates  that  a  10%  change  in 

Canadian/U.S.  exchange  rates  would  cause  a  change  of  about  $16  million  in  the  Asset  Management  segment’s  annual 

pre-tax earnings. 

39

About 67% of CI’s assets under management were held in equity securities at December 31, 2012, which are subject to 

equity risk. Equity risk is classifi ed into two categories: general equity risk and issuer-specifi c risk. CI employs internal and 

external fund managers to take advantage of these individuals’ expertise in particular market niches, sectors and products 

and to reduce issuer-specifi c risk through diversifi cation. CI estimates that a 10% change in the prices of equity indexes 

would cause a change of about $56 million in annual pre-tax earnings.

Asset Administration Segment 

CI’s Asset Administration business is exposed to market risk. The following is a description of how CI mitigates the impact 

this risk has on its fi nancial position and results of operations.

Risk  management  for  administered  assets  is  the  responsibility  of  the  Chief  Compliance  Offi cer  and  senior  management.

Responsibilities  include  ensuring  policies,  processes  and  internal  controls  are  in  place  and  in  accordance  with  regulatory 

requirements. CI’s internal audit department reviews CI’s adherence to these policies and procedures.

CI’s operating results are not materially exposed to market risk impacting the asset administration segment given that this 

segment usually generates less than 1% of the total income before non-segmented items (this segment had income of $3.7 

million before income taxes and non-segmented items for the year ended December 31, 2012). Investment advisors regularly 

review their client portfolios to assess market risk and consult with clients to make appropriate changes to mitigate it. The 

effect of a 10% change in any component of market risk (comprised of interest rate risk, foreign exchange risk and equity risk) 

would have resulted in a change of less than $1 million to the Asset Administration segment’s pre-tax earnings.

CREDIT RISK  

Credit risk is the risk of loss associated with the inability of a third party to fulfi ll its payment obligations. CI is exposed 

to the risk that third parties that owe it money, securities or other assets will not perform their obligations. These parties 

include trading counterparties, customers, clearing agents, exchanges, clearing houses and other fi nancial intermediaries, 

as well as issuers whose securities are held by CI. These parties may default on their obligations due to bankruptcy, lack 

of liquidity, operational failure or other reasons. CI does not have a signifi cant exposure to any individual counterparty. 

Credit  risk  is  mitigated  by  regularly  monitoring  the  credit  performance  of  each  individual  counterparty  and  holding 

collateral where appropriate.

One of the primary sources of credit risk arises when CI extends credit to clients to purchase securities by way of margin 

lending. Margin loans are due on demand and are collateralized by the fi nancial instruments in the client’s account. CI 

faces a risk of fi nancial loss in the event a client fails to meet a margin call if market prices for securities held as collateral 

decline and if CI is unable to recover suffi cient value from the collateral held. The credit extended is limited by regulatory 

requirements and by CI’s internal credit policy. Credit risk is managed by dealing with counterparties CI believes to be 

creditworthy and by actively monitoring credit and margin exposure and the fi nancial health of the counterparties. CI has 

concluded that current economic and credit conditions have not signifi cantly impacted its fi nancial assets.

40

 
LIQUIDITY RISK

Liquidity risk is the risk that CI may not be able to generate suffi cient funds and within the time required in order to meet 

its obligations as they come due. While CI currently has access to fi nancing, unfavourable market conditions may affect 

the ability of CI to obtain loans or make other arrangements on terms acceptable to CI.  

STRATEGIC RISKS 

Strategic  risks  are  risks  that  directly  impact  the  overall  direction  of  CI  and  the  ability  of  CI  to  successfully  implement 

proposed strategies. The key strategic risk is the risk that management fails to anticipate, and respond to changes in the 

business environment including demographic and competitive changes. CI’s performance is directly affected by fi nancial 

market and business conditions, including the legislation and policies of the governments and regulatory authorities having 

jurisdiction over CI’s operations. These are beyond the control of CI; however, an important part of the risk management 

process is the on-going review and assessment of industry and economic trends and changes. Strategies are then designed 

to mitigate the impact of any anticipated changes, including the introduction of new products and cost control strategies.

DISTRIBUTION RISK

CI distributes its investment products through a number of distribution channels including brokers, independent fi nancial 

planners and insurance advisors. CI’s access to these distribution channels is impacted by the strength of the relationship 

with certain business partners and the level of competition faced from the fi nancial institutions that own those channels. 

While CI continues to develop and enhance existing relationships, there can be no assurance that CI will continue to enjoy 

the level of access that it has in the past, which would adversely affect its sales of investment products. 

OPERATIONAL RISKS

Operational  risks  are  risks  related  to  the  actions,  or  failure  in  the  processes,  that  support  the  business  including 

administration, information technology, product development and marketing. The administrative services provided by CI 

depend on software supplied by third-party suppliers. Failure of a key supplier, the loss of these suppliers’ products, or 

problems or errors related to such products would have a material adverse effect on the ability of CI to provide these 

administrative services. Changes to the pricing arrangement with such third-party suppliers because of upgrades or other 

circumstances could have an adverse effect upon the profi tability of CI. There can be no assurances that CI’s systems 

will operate or that CI will be able to prevent an extended systems failure in the event of a subsystem component or 

software failure or in the event of an earthquake, fi re or any other natural disaster, or a power or telecommunications 

failure. Any systems failure that causes interruptions in the operations of CI could have a material adverse effect on its 

business,  fi nancial  condition  and  operating  results.  CI  may  also  experience  losses  in  connection  with  employee  errors. 

Although expenses incurred by CI in connection with employee errors have not been signifi cant in the past, there can be 

no assurances that these expenses will not increase in the future.

TAXATION RISK

CI is subject to various uncertainties concerning the interpretation and application of Canadian tax laws. If tax authorities 

disagree with CI’s application of such tax laws, CI’s profi tability and cash fl ows could be adversely affected. CI Investments 

is  considered  a  large  case  fi le  by  the  Canada  Revenue  Agency,  and  as  such,  is  subject  to  audit  each  year.  There  is  a 

signifi cant lag between the end of a fi scal year and when such audits are completed. Therefore, at any given time, several 

years may be open for audit and/or adjustment.

41

COMPETITION 

CI  operates  in  a  highly  competitive  environment,  with  competition  based  on  a  variety  of  factors,  including  the  range 

of  products  offered,  brand  recognition,  investment  performance,  business  reputation,  fi nancing  strength,  the  strength 

and  continuity  of  institutional,  management  and  sales  relationships,  quality  of  service,  level  of  fees  charged  and  level 

of commissions and other compensation paid. CI competes with a large number of mutual fund companies and other 

providers of investment products, investment management fi rms, broker-dealers, banks, insurance companies and other 

fi nancial institutions. Some of these competitors have greater capital and other resources, and offer more comprehensive 

lines  of  products  and  services  than  CI.  The  trend  toward  greater  consolidation  within  the  investment  management 

industry has increased the strength of a number of CI’s competitors. Additionally, there are few barriers to entry by new 

investment management fi rms, and the successful efforts of new entrants have resulted in increased competition. CI’s 

competitors seek to expand market share by offering different products and services than those offered by CI. While CI 

continues to develop and market new products and services, there can be no assurance that CI will maintain its current 

standing or market share, and that may adversely affect the business, fi nancial condition or operating results of CI.

REGULATORY AND LEGAL RISK

Certain  subsidiaries  of  CI  are  heavily  regulated  in  all  jurisdictions  where  they  carry  on  business.  Laws  and  regulations 

applied  at  the  national  and  provincial  level  generally  grant  governmental  agencies  and  self-regulatory  bodies  broad 

administrative  discretion over the activities  of  CI,  including  the power to limit  or restrict  business activities as well as 

impose  additional  disclosure  requirements  on  CI  products  and  services.  Possible  sanctions  include  the  revocation  or 

imposition of conditions on licenses to operate certain businesses, the suspension or expulsion from a particular market 

or jurisdiction of any of CI’s business segments or its key personnel or fi nancial advisors, and the imposition of fi nes and 

censures.  It  is  also  possible  that  the  laws  and  regulations  governing  a  subsidiary’s  operations  or  particular  investment 

products or services could be amended or interpreted in a manner that is adverse to CI. To the extent that existing or 

future regulations affecting the sale or offering of CI’s product or services or CI’s investment strategies cause or contribute 

to reduced sales of CI’s products or lower margins or impair the investment performance of CI’s products, CI’s aggregate 

assets under management and its revenues may be adversely affected.

Certain subsidiaries of CI are subject to minimum regulatory capital requirements. This may require CI to keep suffi cient cash 

and other liquid assets on hand to maintain capital requirements rather than using them in connection with its business. 

Failure to maintain required regulatory capital by CI may subject it to fi nes, suspension or revocation of registration by 

the relevant securities regulator. A signifi cant operating loss by a registrant subsidiary or an unusually large charge against 

regulatory capital could adversely affect the ability of CI to expand or even maintain its present level of business, which 

could have a material adverse effect on CI’s business, results of operations, fi nancial condition and prospects.

Given the nature of CI’s business, CI may from time to time be subject to claims or complaints from investors or others 

in  the  normal  course  of  business.  The  legal  risks  facing  CI,  its  directors,  offi cers,  employees  or  agents  in  this  respect 

include potential liability for violations of securities laws, breach of fi duciary duty and misuse of investors’ funds. Some 

violations of securities laws and breach of fi duciary duty could result in civil liability, fi nes, sanctions, or expulsion from a 

self-regulatory organization or the suspension or revocation of CI’s subsidiaries’ right to carry on their existing business. CI 

may incur signifi cant costs in connection with such potential liabilities.

42

COMMITMENT OF FINANCIAL ADVISORS AND OTHER KEY PERSONNEL 

The  market  for  fi nancial  advisors  is  extremely  competitive  and  is  increasingly  characterized  by  frequent  movement  by 

fi nancial  advisors  among  different  fi rms.  Individual  fi nancial  advisors  of  AWM  have  regular  direct  contact  with  clients, 

which can lead to a strong and personal client relationship based on the client’s trust in the individual fi nancial advisor. 

The loss of a signifi cant number of fi nancial advisors could lead to the loss of client accounts which could have a material 

adverse effect on the results of operations and prospects of AWM, and, in turn, CI. Although AWM uses or has used a 

combination of competitive compensation structures and equity with vesting provisions as a means of seeking to retain 

fi nancial advisors, there can be no assurance that fi nancial advisors will remain with AWM.

The success of CI is also dependent upon, among other things, the skills and expertise of its human resources including 

the management and investment personnel and its personnel with skills related to, among other things, marketing, risk 

management,  credit,  information  technology,  accounting,  administrative  operations  and  legal  affairs.  These  individuals 

play  an  important  role  in  developing,  implementing,  operating,  managing  and  distributing  CI’s  products  and  services. 

Accordingly, the recruitment of competent personnel, continuous training and transfer of knowledge are key activities 

that are essential to CI’s performance. In addition, the growth in total assets under management in the industry and the 

reliance  on  investment  performance  to  sell  fi nancial  products  have  increased  the  demand  for  experienced  and  high-

performing  portfolio  managers.  Compensation  packages  for  these  managers  may  increase  at  a  rate  well  in  excess  of 

infl ation and well above the rates of increase observed in other industries and the rest of the labour market. CI believes 

that it has the resources necessary for the operation of CI’s business. The loss of these individuals or an inability to attract, 

retain and motivate a suffi cient number of qualifi ed personnel could adversely affect CI’s business.

INFORMATION REGARDING GUARANTORS

The  following  tables  provide  unaudited  consolidated  fi nancial  information  for  CI,  CI  Investments  and  non-guarantor 

subsidiaries for the periods identifi ed below, presented with a separate column for: (i) CI; (ii) CI Investments, (iii) the non-

guarantor subsidiaries of CI on a combined basis [the “Other Subsidiaries”); (iv) consolidating adjustments; and (v) the total 

consolidated amounts.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31* (unaudited)

(in millions of dollars) 

2012 

2011 

2012 

2011 

2012 

2011 

2012 

2011 

2012 

2011

CI Financial 

CI Investments 

Subsidiaries 

Adjustments 

Amounts

Other 

Consolidating 

Consolidated

Total

Revenue 

Net income 

    225.3  

 669.8     1,289.5  

 1,358.4   

  389.0  

 395.7   

 (446.1) 

 (927.6)    1,457.7  

 1,496.3    

  211.0  

 654.4   

  312.8  

 380.0   

  39.3  

 37.1      (210.9)  

 (694.6) 

  352.2  

 376.9    

*Some comparative fi gures have been reclassed to conform to the presentation in the current year.

43

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION DATA AS AT DECEMBER 31* (unaudited) 

(in millions of dollars) 

2012 

2011 

2012 

2011 

2012 

2011 

2012 

2011 

2012 

2011

CI Financial 

CI Investments 

Subsidiaries 

Adjustments 

Amounts

Other 

Consolidating 

Consolidated

Total

Current assets 

    215.6  

 486.8   

  206.2  

 170.2   

  196.4  

 199.9   

 (329.6) 

 (497.1) 

 288.6  

 359.8    

Non-current assets 

    1,836.2  

 1,697.5     2,875.6  

 2,936.1   

 176.3  

 137.4     (2,205.1)   (2,045.8)    2,683.0  

 2,725.2    

Current liabilities 

   70.0  

 301.9   

  116.1  

 106.9   

 152.9  

 150.4   

 (16.5) 

 (3.3) 

 322.5  

 555.9    

Non-current liabilities 

    270.7  

 222.1     1,129.8  

 1,302.0   

 0.5  

 0.2   

 (427.9) 

 (615.4) 

 973.1  

 908.9    

*Some comparative fi gures have been reclassed to conform to the presentation in the current year.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS 

The Bank of Nova Scotia (“Scotiabank”) owns approximately 37% of the common shares of CI, and is therefore considered a 

related party. CI has entered into transactions related to the advisory and distribution of its mutual funds with Scotiabank. 

These transactions are in the normal course of operations and are recorded at the agreed upon exchange amounts. During 

the three and 12 months ended December 31, 2012, CI incurred charges for deferred sales commissions of $1.0 million and 

$4.9 million, respectively [three and 12 months ended December 31, 2011 – $1.0 million and $4.9 million, respectively] and 

trailer fees of $5.1 million and $20.3 million, respectively [three and 12 months ended December 31, 2011 – $5.0 million and 

$20.0 million, respectively] which were paid or payable to Scotiabank. The balance payable to Scotiabank as at December 

31, 2012 of $1.7 million [December 31, 2011 – $1.7 million] is included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities.

SHARE CAPITAL

As at December 31, 2012, CI had 282,914,642 shares outstanding.

At December 31, 2012, 6.4 million options to purchase shares were outstanding, of which 2.4 million options were exercisable.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

The table that follows summarizes CI’s contractual obligations at December 31, 2012.

PAYMENTS DUE BY YEAR

(millions of dollars) 

Credit facility 

Debentures 

Operating leases 

Total 

44

1 year 

or less 

24.0 

— 

11.0 

35.0 

Total 

96.0 

500.0 

104.9 

700.9 

2 

3 

4 

5 

5 years

  More than

24.0 

200.0 

9.6 

233.6 

48.0 

— 

9.1 

— 

300.0 

9.0 

57.1 

309.0 

— 

— 

8.6 

8.6 

—

—

57.6

57.6

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

The December 31, 2012 Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS. For a discussion of 

all signifi cant accounting policies, refer to Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Included in the 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements is Note 3 which provides a discussion regarding the recoverable amount 

of CI’s goodwill and intangible assets compared to its carrying value. 

CI carries signifi cant goodwill and intangible assets on its balance sheet. CI uses valuation models that use estimates of 

future market returns and sales and redemptions of investment products as the primary determinants of fair value. CI also 

uses a valuation approach based on a multiple of assets under management and assets under administration for each of 

CI’s operating segments. The multiple used by CI refl ects recent transactions and research reports by independent equity 

research  analysts.  CI  has  renewed  these  key  variables  in  light  of  the  current  economic  climate.  Estimates  of  sales  and 

redemptions are very likely to change as economic conditions either improve or deteriorate, whereas estimates of future 

market returns are less likely to do so. The models are most sensitive to current levels of assets under management and 

administration as well as estimates of future market returns. While these balances are not currently impaired, a decline 

of 20% in the fair value of certain models may result in an impairment of goodwill or other intangibles recorded on the 

statement of fi nancial position.

DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

The Chief Executive Offi cer (“CEO”) and the Chief Financial Offi cer (“CFO”), together with management, are responsible for 

the design of CI’s disclosure controls and procedures. Management has evaluated, with participation of the CEO and CFO, the 

effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as at December 31, 2012. Based on this evaluation, the CEO and CFO 

have concluded that they are reasonably assured these Disclosure Controls and Procedures were effective and that material 

information relating to CI was made known to them within the time periods specifi ed under applicable securities legislation.  

Management,  under  the  supervision  of  the  CEO  and  CFO,  is  responsible  for  the  design  and  maintenance  of  adequate 

internal  controls  over  fi nancial  reporting  for  the  purposes  of  providing  reasonable  assurance  regarding  the  reliability  of 

fi nancial reporting and the preparation of fi nancial statements for external purposes in accordance with IFRS. However, due 

to its inherent limitations, internal controls over fi nancial reporting can only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance 

that the fi nancial statements are free of misstatements. The COSO framework was used to assist management, along with 

the CEO and CFO, in the evaluation of these internal control systems. Management, under the direction of the CEO and 

CFO, have concluded that the internal controls over fi nancial reporting are effective. Management used various tools to 

evaluate internal controls over fi nancial reporting which included interaction with key control systems, review of policy and 

procedure documentation, observation or reperformance of control procedures to evaluate the effectiveness of controls 

and concluded that these controls are effective. For the year ended December 31, 2012, there have been no changes to the 

internal controls over fi nancial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to affect, internal controls 

over fi nancial reporting.

Additional information relating to CI, including the most recent audited fi nancial statements, management information circular and 
annual information form are available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

45

Consolidated
Financial Statements

December 31, 2012

CI Financial Corp.

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS

Management  of  CI  Financial  Corp.  [“CI”]  is  responsible  for  the  integrity  and  objectivity  of  the  consolidated  fi nancial 

statements  and  all  other  information  contained  in  this  document.  The  consolidated  fi nancial  statements  have  been 

prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards and are based on management’s best information 

and judgment.

In fulfi lling its responsibilities, management has developed internal control systems and procedures designed to provide 

reasonable  assurance  that  CI’s  assets  are  safeguarded,  that  transactions  are  executed  in  accordance  with  appropriate 

authorization, and that accounting records may be relied upon to properly refl ect CI’s business transactions.

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is composed of outside directors who meet periodically and independently 

with management and the auditors to discuss CI’s fi nancial reporting and internal control. The Audit Committee reviews 

the fi nancial information prepared by management and the results of the audit by the auditors prior to recommending the 

consolidated fi nancial statements to the Board of Directors for approval. The external auditors have unrestricted access 

to the Audit Committee.

Management recognizes its responsibility to conduct CI’s affairs in the best interests of its shareholders.

Stephen A. MacPhail 

Chief Executive Offi cer 

 Douglas J. Jamieson

 Chief Financial Offi cer

47

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT

TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF CI FINANCIAL CORP. 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated fi nancial statements of CI Financial Corp. [“CI”], which comprise the 

consolidated statements of fi nancial position as at December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the consolidated statements of income 

and comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash fl ows for the years then ended, and a summary of 

signifi cant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management’s responsibility for the consolidated fi nancial statements

Management  is  responsible  for  the  preparation  and  fair  presentation  of  these  consolidated  fi nancial  statements  in 

accordance  with  International  Financial  Reporting  Standards,  and  for  such  internal  control  as  management  determines 

is  necessary  to  enable  the  preparation  of  consolidated  fi nancial  statements  that  are  free  from  material  misstatement, 

whether due to fraud or error.

Auditors’ responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated fi nancial statements based on our audits. We conducted 

our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we comply 

with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated 

fi nancial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated 

fi nancial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditors’ judgment, including the assessment of the risks 

of material misstatement of the consolidated fi nancial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk 

assessments,  the  auditors  consider  internal  control  relevant  to  the  entity’s  preparation  and  fair  presentation  of  the 

consolidated fi nancial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not 

for  the  purpose  of  expressing  an  opinion  on  the  effectiveness  of  the  entity’s  internal  control.  An  audit  also  includes 

evaluating  the  appropriateness  of  accounting  policies  used  and  the  reasonableness  of  accounting  estimates  made  by 

management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated fi nancial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained in our audits is suffi cient and appropriate to provide a basis for our 

audit opinion. 

Opinion

In our opinion, the consolidated fi nancial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the fi nancial position of CI as at 

December 31, 2012 and 2011, and its fi nancial performance and its cash fl ows for the years then ended in accordance with 

International Financial Reporting Standards.

Toronto, Canada

February 14, 2013

48

Consolidated Statements
OF FINANCIAL POSITION

As at December 31 

[in thousands of Canadian dollars] 

ASSETS

Current 

Cash and cash equivalents 

Client and trust funds on deposit 

Marketable securities 

Accounts receivable and prepaid expenses 

Total current assets 

Capital assets, net [note 2]  

Deferred sales commissions, net of accumulated

   amortization of $492,856  [December 31, 2011 – $494,642] 

Intangibles [note 3] 

Other assets [note 4] 

Total assets 

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Current

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 

Provisions for other liabilities [note 6] 

Dividends payable [note 8] 

Client and trust funds payable 

Income taxes payable [note 9] 

Current portion of long-term debt [note 5] 

Total current liabilities 

Deferred lease inducement 

Long-term debt [note 5] 

Provisions for other liabilities [note 6] 

Deferred income taxes [note 9] 

Total liabilities 

Shareholders’ equity 

Share capital [note 7(a)] 

Contributed surplus 

Defi cit 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) 

Total shareholders’ equity 

(see accompanying notes)

On behalf of the Board of Directors: 

2012 

$  

 24,137  

 127,712  

 66,155  

 70,597  

 288,601  

2011

$

 122,550 

 124,978  

 42,099  

 70,168 

 359,795   

 46,879  

 49,634   

  452,319  

 2,161,403  

 22,413  

2,971,615  

 119,721  

 1,097  

 45,254  

 125,773  

 6,608  

 24,000  

 322,453  

 17,165  

 570,368  

6,611  

 379,030  

 1,295,627  

 1,964,433  

 14,511  

 (303,126) 

 170  

 1,675,988  

 2,971,615  

 491,216    

 2,162,122   

 22,215    

 3,084,982   

 120,797 

 2,417 

 42,526 

 123,745 

 8,736 

 257,763 

 555,984 

 18,489 

 522,592 

 6,530 

 361,202 

 1,464,797  

 1,964,334 

 20,059 

(362,377)

(1,831)

 1,620,185 

 3,084,982 

 --------------------------------  
William T. Holland 
Director 

 --------------------------------
G. Raymond Chang
Director

49

   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
   
 
 
   
 
Consolidated Statements
OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

For the years ended December 31

[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts] 

REVENUE

Management fees 

Administration fees 

Redemption fees 

Gain (loss) on sale of marketable securities 

Other income [note 4] 

EXPENSES

Selling, general and administrative 

Trailer fees [note 14] 

Investment dealer fees 

Amortization of deferred sales commissions 

Amortization of intangibles 

Interest [note 5] 

Other [note 4] 

Income before income taxes 

Provision for income taxes [note 9]

Current 

Deferred 

Net income for the year 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax   

Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale fi nancial assets,

  net of income taxes of $287 [2011 – $(449)] 

Reversal of losses to net income on available-for-sale

  fi nancial assets, net of income taxes of $19 [2011 – $125] 

Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax 

Comprehensive income 

2012 

$ 

2011

$

 1,277,698  

 1,302,773 

 125,985  

 27,388  

 303  

 26,368  

 132,272 

 28,629 

(489)

 33,108 

 1,457,742  

 1,496,293    

 286,009  

 373,954  

 98,263  

 163,100  

 2,437  

 24,937  

 5,265  

 953,965  

 503,777  

 134,092  

 17,522  

 151,614  

352,163  

 290,776 

 379,454 

 103,753 

 164,431 

 2,386 

 27,496 

 6,927 

 975,223 

 521,070   

 131,420    

12,751   

 144,171  

376,899   

1,899  

(2,656) 

102  

2,001  

681 

(1,975) 

354,164 

 374,924  

Basic and diluted earnings per share  [note 7(c)] 

$1.24  

$1.31 

(see accompanying notes) 

50

   
   
   
   
Consolidated Statements 
OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY 

For the years ended December 31

Share capital 

Contributed 

  comprehensive  

[note 7(a)] 

surplus 

Defi cit 

income (loss) 

Accumulated 

other  

[in thousands of Canadian dollars]  

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

Total

$

Balance, December 31, 2011 

   1,964,334  

 20,059  

 (362,377) 

 (1,831) 

 1,620,185  

Comprehensive income 

Dividends declared [note 8] 

Shares repurchased 

Issuance of share capital on exercise of options  

Compensation expense for equity-based plans 

Change during the year 

 —  

 —  

 (9,534) 

 9,633  

 —  

99  

 —  

 —  

 —  

 (9,434) 

 3,886  

 352,163  

 (271,912) 

 (21,000) 

 —  

 —  

 2,001  

 —  

 —  

 —  

 —  

 (5,548)  

 59,251  

 2,001  

 354,164 

(271,912)

(30,534)

 199  

 3,886 

 55,803 

Balance, December 31, 2012 

1,964,433  

14,511  

(303,126) 

170  

1,675,988   

Balance, December 31, 2010 

  1,984,488  

 21,846  

 (440,404) 

 144  

 1,566,074  

Comprehensive income 

Dividends declared [note 8] 

Shares repurchased 

Issuance of share capital on exercise of options 

  and vesting of deferred equity units  

Compensation expense for equity-based plans 

Change during the year 

Balance, December 31, 2011 

(see accompanying notes)  

 —  

 —  

 (32,729) 

 12,575  

 —  

 (20,154) 

1,964,334  

 —  

 —  

— 

 (8,787) 

 7,000  

 (1,787) 

20,059  

 376,899  

 (1,975) 

 374,924  

 (236,407) 

 (62,465) 

 —  

 —  

 78,027  

(362,377) 

 —  

 —  

 —  

 —  

(236,407)

(95,194) 

 3,788  

 7,000  

 (1,975) 

 54,111  

(1,831) 

1,620,185    

51

   
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
   
Consolidated Statements
OF CASH FLOWS

For the years ended December 31

[in thousands of Canadian dollars] 

OPERATING  ACTIVITIES (*)

Net income 

Add (deduct) items not involving cash 

  Gain (loss) on sale of marketable securities 

  Equity-based compensation 

  Amortization of deferred sales commissions 

  Amortization of intangibles 

  Amortization and depreciation of other 

  Deferred income taxes 

Cash provided by operating activities before changes 

  in operating assets and liabilities 

Net change in non-cash working capital balances 

Cash provided by operating activities 

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

Purchase of marketable securities 

Proceeds on sale of marketable securities 

Additions to capital assets 

Deferred sales commissions paid 

Decrease (increase) in other assets 

Additions to intangibles 

Cash used in investing activities 

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

Increase in long-term debt 

Repayment of debentures 

Repurchase of share capital 

Issuance of share capital 

Dividends paid to shareholders 

Cash used in fi nancing activities 

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents during the year 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year 

(*) Included in operating activities are the following: 

Interest paid 

Income taxes paid 

(see accompanying notes)

52

2012 

$ 

2011

$

 352,163  

 376,899  

 (303) 

 3,886  

 163,100  

 2,437  

  9,328  

 17,522  

  548,133  

 (6,700)  

 541,433 

 (26,761) 

 5,315  

 (5,560) 

  (124,203) 

 (400) 

  (1,718) 

489 

 7,000  

 164,431  

 2,386  

 10,773  

12,751 

 574,729  

(63,679)  

 511,050   

(43,740)

 32,082 

(21,477)

(141,232)

 7,745  

(1,924)

 (153,327) 

(168,546)

 63,000 

 (250,000) 

 (30,534) 

 199  

  (269,184) 

  (486,519) 

 (98,413) 

   122,550  

   24,137  

 25,101 

 136,165 

9,092 

(100,000) 

(95,194) 

3,812

(254,201)

(436,491)

(93,987)

 216,537  

 122,550  

27,507 

213,326

   
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]

December 31, 2012 and 2011

CI Financial Corp. [“CI”] is incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario. CI’s primary business is the management 

and distribution of a broad range of fi nancial products and services, including mutual funds, segregated funds, fi nancial 

planning, insurance, investment advice, wealth management and estate and succession planning.   

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES 

These consolidated fi nancial statements of CI have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting 

Standards [“IFRS”] as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board [“IASB”].

These consolidated fi nancial statements were authorized for issuance by the Board of Directors of CI on February 14, 2013.

Basis of presentation

The  consolidated  fi nancial  statements  of  CI  have  been  prepared  on  a  historical  cost  basis,  except  for  certain  fi nancial 

instruments that have been measured at fair value. The consolidated fi nancial statements have been prepared on a going 

concern basis. CI’s presentation currency is the Canadian dollar. The functional currency of CI and its subsidiaries is also 

the Canadian dollar.

Basis of consolidation

The  consolidated  fi nancial  statements  include  the  accounts  of  CI,  CI  Investments  Inc.  [“CI  Investments”]  and  Assante 

Wealth Management (Canada) Ltd. [“AWM”] and their subsidiaries, which are entities over which CI has control. Control 

exists when CI has the power, directly or indirectly, to govern the fi nancial and operating policies of an entity so as to 

obtain benefi ts from its activities. Hereinafter, CI and its subsidiaries are referred to as CI.

Revenue recognition

Revenue is recognized to the extent that it is probable that economic benefi ts will fl ow to CI and the revenue can be 

reliably measured. Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable. In addition to these 

general principles, CI applies the following specifi c revenue recognition policies:

Management fees are based upon the net asset value of the funds managed by CI and are recognized on an accrual basis.  

Administration  fees  and  other  income  are  recognized  as  services  are  provided  under  contractual  arrangements. 

Administration fees include commission revenue, which is recorded on a trade date basis and advisory fees, which are 

recorded when the services related to the underlying engagements are completed.

Redemption fees payable by securityholders of deferred sales charge mutual funds, the sales commission of which was 

fi nanced by CI, are recognized as revenue on the trade date of the redemption of the applicable mutual fund securities.

53

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]

December 31, 2012 and 2011

Financial instruments 

Financial assets are classifi ed at fair value through profi t or loss [“FVPL”], available-for-sale [“AFS”] or loans and receivables. 

Financial liabilities are classifi ed as FVPL or other. 

Financial instruments are recognized initially at fair value. Transaction costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition 

or issue of a fi nancial instrument classifi ed as other than at FVPL are added to the carrying amount of the asset or liability. 

The fair value of fi nancial instruments is generally determined by reference to quoted market bid prices where an active 

market exists. Where there is no active market, the fair value is determined using valuation techniques. 

Financial instruments classifi ed as FVPL are carried at fair value in the statement of fi nancial position and any gains or 

losses are recorded in net income in the period in which they arise. Financial instruments classifi ed as FVPL include cash 

and cash equivalents as well as an amount included in accounts payable and other liabilities.

Financial  assets  classifi ed  as  AFS  are  carried  at  fair  value  in  the  statement  of  fi nancial  position.  Movements  in  the  fair 

value  are  recorded  in  other  comprehensive  income  until  disposed,  at  which  time  the  cumulative  amount  recorded  in 

comprehensive income is recognized in net income. Where there is objective evidence that an AFS asset is impaired, the 

cumulative impairment loss is reclassifi ed from other comprehensive income to net income with subsequent movements 

also recognized in net income. Financial assets classifi ed as AFS include marketable securities.

Loans  and  receivables  and  other  fi nancial  liabilities  are  recognized  at  amortized  cost  using  the  effective  interest  rate 

method. Such accounts include client and trust funds on deposits, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued 

liabilities, dividends payable, client and trust funds payable and long-term debt.

All  fi nancial  instruments  recognized  at  fair  value  in  the  consolidated  statement  of  fi nancial  position  are  classifi ed  into 

three fair value hierarchy levels as follows:

Level 1 – valuation based on quoted prices (unadjusted) observed in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
 

 Level 2 – valuation techniques based on inputs that are quoted prices of similar instruments in active markets; quoted 

prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices used in a valuation 

model that are observable for that instrument; and inputs that are derived from or corroborated by observable market 

data by correlation or other means.

  Level 3 – valuation techniques with signifi cant unobservable market inputs.

54

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]

December 31, 2012 and 2011

Derivatives and hedging

CI  may  enter  into  interest  rate  swap  agreements  to  reduce  its  exposure  to  interest  rate  risk  on  its  long-term  debt.  CI 

does  not  enter  into  derivative  fi nancial  instruments  for  trading  or  speculative  purposes.  At  the  inception  of  the  swap 

agreement,  CI  formally  documents  the  hedging  relationship,  detailing  the  risk  management  objective  and  the  hedging 

strategy of the hedge. The documentation specifi es the asset, liability or cash fl ows being hedged, the related hedging 

item, the nature of the specifi c risk exposure or exposures being hedged, the intended term of the hedging relationship, 

the method for assessing the effectiveness of the hedging relationship, and the method for measuring the ineffectiveness 

of the hedging relationship. Derivative fi nancial instruments that have been designated and qualify for hedge accounting 

are classifi ed as either cash fl ow or fair value hedges.  

Changes in the fair value of the interest rate swaps are recognized in the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive 

income  as  other  income.  Similarly,  changes  in  the  fair  value  of  the  hedged  item  attributable  to  the  hedged  risk  are  also 

recognized in the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive income as other income, with a corresponding 

adjustment to the long-term debt in the consolidated statement of fi nancial position. Hedge accounting is discontinued 

prospectively  if  the  hedging  relationship  no  longer  qualifi es  as  an  effective  hedge  or  if  the  hedging  item  is  settled.  The 

hedged item is no longer adjusted to refl ect changes in fair value. Amounts previously recorded as cumulative adjustments 

to the effective portion of gains and losses attributable to the hedged risk are amortized using the effective interest rate 

method and recognized in the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive income over the remaining useful life 

of the hedged item. Hedge accounting is also discontinued if the hedged item is sold or terminated before maturity.  In such 

a situation, the cumulative adjustments with respect to the effective portion of gains and losses attributable to the hedged 

risk are immediately recorded in the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive income.

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash on deposit, highly liquid investments and interest bearing deposits with original 

maturities of 90 days or less.

Client and trust funds

Client and trust funds on deposit include amounts representing cash held in trust with Canadian fi nancial institutions for 

clients in respect of self-administered Registered Retirement Savings Plans and Registered Retirement Income Funds, and 

amounts received from clients for which the settlement date on the purchase of securities has not occurred or accounts 

in which the clients maintain a cash balance. Client and trust funds on deposit also include amounts for client transactions 

that are entered into on either a cash or margin basis and recorded on the trade date of the transaction. Amounts are 

due from clients on the settlement date of the transaction for cash accounts. For margin accounts, CI extends credit to 

a client for the purchase of securities, collateralized by the fi nancial instruments in the client’s account. Amounts loaned 

are  limited  by  margin  regulations  of  the  Investment  Industry  Regulatory  Organization  of  Canada  [“IIROC”]  and  other 

regulatory authorities, and are subject to CI’s credit review and daily monitoring procedures. The corresponding liabilities 

related to the above accounts and transactions are included in client and trust funds payable.

55

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]

December 31, 2012 and 2011

Marketable securities

Marketable securities consist of investments in mutual fund securities and publicly traded companies. Marketable securities 

are measured at fair value and recognized on trade date. Mutual fund securities are valued using the net asset value per 

unit  of  each  fund.  The  fair  value  of  publicly  traded  companies  is  determined  using  quoted  market  prices.  Realized  and 

unrealized gains and losses are recognized using average cost. Except for impairment losses, gains and losses in the fair value 

of marketable securities are recorded as other comprehensive income (loss) until disposed of, at which time any gain or loss is 

recorded in net income. When a decline in fair value is other than temporary and there is objective evidence of impairment, 

the cumulative loss that had been recognized directly in other comprehensive income (loss) is removed and recognized in net 

income, even though the fi nancial asset has not been derecognized. Distributions from mutual fund securities are recorded 

as other income. Distributions that are reinvested increase the cost base of the marketable securities.

Capital assets

Capital assets are recorded at cost less accumulated amortization. These assets are amortized over their estimated useful 

lives as follows:

Computer hardware 

Offi ce equipment 

Straight-line over three years

Straight-line over fi ve years

Leasehold improvements 

Straight-line over the term of the lease

Deferred sales commissions

Commissions paid on sales of deferred sales charge mutual funds represent commissions paid by CI to brokers and dealers, 

and are recorded on the trade date of the sale of the applicable mutual fund product. Deferred sales commissions are 

amortized  over  the  expected  investment  period  of  24  to  84  months  on  a  straight-line  basis  from  the  date  recorded.  

When  redemptions  occur,  the  actual  investment  period  is  shorter  than  expected,  and  the  unamortized  deferred 

sales commission related to the original investment in the mutual funds is charged to net income and included in the 

amortization of deferred sales commissions.

Intangible assets

Fund contracts

Fund  administration  contracts  and  fund  management  contracts  [collectively,  “fund  contracts”]  are  recorded  net  of  any 

write-down for impairment. CI evaluates the carrying amounts of fund contracts for potential impairment by comparing the 

recoverable amount with their carrying amounts. These evaluations are performed on an annual basis or more frequently 

if events or changes in circumstances indicate a potential impairment. Any impairment would be written off to income.

56

 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]

December 31, 2012 and 2011

Fund administration contracts are amortized on a straight-line basis over 25 years. Fund management contracts with a 

fi nite life are amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of up to 20 years, depending on the contractual terms of 

such agreements and management’s best estimate of their useful lives.  Fund management contracts with an indefi nite 

life are not amortized.  

Goodwill

Goodwill  is  recorded  as  the  excess  of  purchase  price  over  identifi able  assets  acquired.  Following  initial  recognition, 

goodwill is stated at cost less any accumulated impairment losses. Goodwill is evaluated for impairment at least annually 

and any impairment is recognized immediately in income and not subsequently reversed. Goodwill is allocated to the 

appropriate cash-generating unit for the purpose of impairment testing. 

Other intangibles

Other intangibles include the costs of trademarks and computer software, capitalized where it is probable that future 

economic benefi ts that are attributable to the assets will fl ow to CI and the cost of the assets can be measured reliably.  

Computer  software  is  recorded  initially  at  cost  and  amortized  over  its  expected  useful  life  of  two  to  ten  years  on  a 

straight-line basis. Trademarks have an indefi nite life and are not amortized.

Equity-based compensation

CI uses the fair value method to account for equity-settled employee incentive share options. The value of the equity-

based compensation, as at the date of grant, is recognized over the applicable vesting period as compensation expense 

with a corresponding increase in contributed surplus. When options are exercised, the proceeds received, together with 

the amount in contributed surplus, are credited to share capital. 

The amount recognized as an expense is adjusted to refl ect the number of awards for which the related service conditions 

are expected to be met, such that the amount ultimately recognized as an expense is based on the number of awards that 

do meet the related service condition at the vesting date.

Deferred lease inducements

Lease inducements are deferred and amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.

Income taxes

Current income tax liabilities are measured at the amount expected to be paid to tax authorities, net of recoveries based 

on the tax rates and laws enacted or substantively enacted at the statement of fi nancial position date.

57

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]

December 31, 2012 and 2011

The liability method of tax allocation is used in accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred income tax 

assets  and  liabilities  are  determined  based  on  differences  between  the  carrying  amount  and  tax  basis  of  assets  and 

liabilities  and  measured  using  the  substantively  enacted  tax  rates  and  laws  that  will  be  in  effect  when  the  differences 

are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are recognized to the extent that it is probable that taxable profi ts will be 

available against which deductible temporary differences can be utilized. Deferred tax liabilities are generally recognized 

for all taxable temporary differences.  

Deferred  tax  liabilities  are  recognized  for  taxable  temporary differences  arising  in  investments  in  subsidiaries  and  joint 

ventures except where the reversal of the temporary difference can be controlled and it is probable that the difference 

will not reverse in the foreseeable future. Deferred tax liabilities are not recognized on temporary differences that arise 

from the initial recognition of goodwill which is not deductible for tax purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are 

not recognized in respect of temporary differences that arise on initial recognition of assets and liabilities acquired other 

than in a business combination.  

Provisions for other liabilities

A provision for other liabilities is recognized if, as a result of a past event, CI has a present legal or constructive obligation 

that  can  be  estimated  reliably,  and  it  is  probable  that  an  outfl ow  of  economic  benefi ts  will  be  required  to  settle  the 

obligation.  In the event that the time value of money is material, provisions are determined by discounting the expected 

future cash fl ows at a pre-tax rate that refl ects a current market assessment of the time value of money and the risks 

specifi c to the liability.  

Foreign currency translation

Monetary assets and liabilities are translated into Canadian dollars using the exchange rates in effect at the statement 

of  fi nancial  position  date.  Non-monetary  assets  and  liabilities  are  translated  into  Canadian  dollars  using  historical 

exchange rates. Revenue and expenses are translated at average rates prevailing during the month. Other foreign currency 

transactions are translated into Canadian dollars using the exchange rate in effect on the transaction date. Translation 

exchange gains and losses are included in other income in the month in which they occur.

58

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]

December 31, 2012 and 2011

Critical accounting estimates and judgements

In the process of applying CI’s accounting policies, management has made signifi cant judgements involving estimates and 

assumptions which are summarized as follows:

(i)  Impairment of intangible assets 

Indefi nite life intangible assets, including goodwill, are tested for impairment annually or more frequently if changes in 

circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may be impaired. The values associated with intangibles involve estimates 

and assumptions, including those with respect to future cash infl ows and outfl ows, discount rates and asset lives. These 

estimates  require  signifi cant  judgement  regarding  market  growth  rates,  fund  fl ow  assumptions,  expected  margins  and 

costs which could affect CI’s future results if the current estimates of future performance and fair values change. These 

determinations also affect the amount of amortization expense on fund contracts with fi nite lives recognized in future 

periods.

(ii)  Deferred tax assets

Deferred  tax  assets  are  recognized  for  unused  tax  losses  to  the  extent  that  it  is  probable  that  taxable  profi ts  will  be 

available against which the losses can be utilized. Signifi cant management judgement is required to determine the amount 

of deferred tax assets that can be recognized, based upon the likely timing and level of future taxable profi ts together 

with future tax planning strategies. 

(iii)  Provisions for other liabilities

Due  to  the  nature  of  provisions,  a  considerable  part  of  their  determination  is  based  on  estimates  and  judgements, 

including assumptions concerning the future. The actual outcome of these uncertain factors may be materially different 

from the estimates, causing differences with the estimated provisions. Further details are provided in Note 6. 

(iv)  Share-based payments

The cost of employee services received (compensation expense) in exchange for awards of equity instruments recognized 

is estimated using a Black-Scholes option valuation model which requires the use of assumptions. Further details regarding 

the assumptions used in the option pricing model are provided in Note 7 [b].

59

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]

December 31, 2012 and 2011

2. CAPITAL ASSETS

Capital assets consist of the following:

Cost 

Balance, December 31, 2010 

Additions 

Retired 

Balance, December 31, 2011 

Additions 

Retired 

Computer 

Offi ce  

Leasehold 

hardware  

equipment  

improvements 

$ 

$ 

$ 

18,872 

4,371 

(11,444) 

11,799 

607 

(751) 

12,401 

1,880 

(4,888) 

9,393 

791 

(6) 

Balance, December 31, 2012 

11,655 

10,178 

Accumulated depreciation

Balance, December 31, 2010 

Depreciation 

Retired 

Balance, December 31, 2011 

Depreciation 

Retired 

Balance, December 31, 2012 

Carrying amounts

At December 31, 2010 

At December 31, 2011 

At December 31, 2012 

15,893 

2,805 

(11,444) 

7,254 

2,500 

(751) 

9,003 

2,979 

4,545 

2,652 

8,816 

1,177 

(4,888) 

5,105 

1,239 

(6) 

6,338 

3,585 

4,288 

3,840 

60

Total 

$

79,341

21,477

(26,164)

74,654

5,560

(757)

79,457

41,408

9,776

(26,164)

25,020

8,315

(757)

32,578

37,933

49,634

46,879

48,068 

15,226 

(9,832) 

53,462 

4,162 

— 

57,624 

16,699 

5,794 

(9,832) 

12,661 

4,576 

— 

17,237 

31,369 

40,801 

40,387 

   
 
   
   
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]

December 31, 2012 and 2011

3. INTANGIBLES

Intangible assets consist of the following:

Fund 

Fund  

Fund 

management   management 

administration 

contracts  

contracts 

Other 

Goodwill 

contracts 

fi nite life  

indefi nite life  

intangibles 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

Total 

$

Cost 

Balance, December 31, 2010 

1,119,926 

37,600 

27,500 

999,082 

20,422 

2,204,530

Additions 

— 

— 

— 

— 

1,924 

1,924

Balance, December 31, 2011 

1,119,926 

37,600 

27,500 

999,082 

22,346 

2,206,454

Additions 

— 

— 

— 

— 

1,718 

1,718

Balance, December 31, 2012 

1,119,926 

37,600 

27,500 

999,082 

24,064 

2,208,172

Accumulated amortization

Balance, December 31, 2010 

Amortization 

Balance, December 31, 2011 

Amortization 

Balance, December 31, 2012 

Carrying amounts

At December 31, 2010 

At December 31, 2011 

At December 31, 2012 

Remaining term 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

1,119,926 

1,119,926 

1,119,926 

10,552 

1,504 

12,056 

1,504 

13,560 

27,048 

25,544 

24,040 

14,906 

775 

15,681 

775 

16,456 

12,594 

11,819 

11,044 

N/A  15.9 – 16.4 yrs 

14.3 yrs 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

999,082 

999,082 

999,082 

N/A 

41,946

2,386

44,332

2,437

46,769

2,162,584

2,162,122

2,161,403

16,488 

107 

16,595 

158 

16,753 

3,934 

5,751 

7,311 

N/A

61

   
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
   
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]

December 31, 2012 and 2011

(a)  Cash-generating units

CI  has  two  cash-generating  units  [“CGU”]  for  the  purpose  of  assessing  the  carrying  amount  of  the  allocated  goodwill 

and intangible assets, being the asset management and asset administration operating segments as described in Note 15.  

(b)  Impairment testing of goodwill

As at December 31, 2012 and 2011, CI has allocated goodwill of $927,344 and $192,582 to the asset management and asset 

administration  operating  segments,  respectively.  The  recoverable  amount  of  goodwill  for  the  asset  management  and 

asset administration operating segments as at December 31, 2012 and 2011 has been determined based on a fair value less 

costs to sell calculation, using a valuation multiple applied to assets under management and assets under administration, 

respectively. This methodology is commonly used in the marketplace by independent equity research analysts.  

The calculation of the recoverable amounts exceeds the carrying amounts of both the asset management and the asset 

administration  operating  segments,  including  goodwill.  Recent  equity  market  performance,  recent  market  transactions 

and  CI’s  current  market  capitalization  provide  additional  evidence  that  the  recoverable  amount  of  these  operating 

segments is in excess of the carrying amounts.  

(c)  Impairment testing of fund contracts

As at December 31, 2012 and 2011, CI had indefi nite life fund management contracts within the asset management CGU 

of $999,082. These are contracts for the management of open end funds which have no expiry or termination provisions.  

The fair value of indefi nite life intangibles within the asset management operating segment as at December 31, 2012 and 

2011 has been determined based on a value in use calculation, using 10 year forecasts and a terminal value for the period 

thereafter. The key assumptions used in the forecast calculation include assumptions on market appreciation, net sales of 

funds and operating margins. The terminal value has been calculated assuming a long-term growth rate of 2% per annum 

in perpetuity [December 31, 2011 - 2%], based on a long-term real GDP growth rate. A discount rate of 7.25% per annum 

[December 31, 2011 - 8.05%] has been applied to the recoverable calculation.

The calculation of the recoverable amount exceeds the carrying amount of indefi nite life management contracts as at 

December 31, 2012 and 2011. Recent equity market performance provides additional evidence that the recoverable amount 

of indefi nite life intangibles is in excess of the carrying amount.

62

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]

December 31, 2012 and 2011

4. OTHER ASSETS, INCOME AND EXPENSE

Other assets consists mainly of an investment in a limited partnership, long-term accounts receivable, deferred charges 

and loans advanced to employees, shareholders and investment advisors.

CI has an employee share purchase loan program for key employees. These loans are renewable yearly and bear interest 

at prescribed rates. As at December 31, 2012, the carrying amount of employee share purchase loans is $9,162 [December 

31, 2011 - $10,450] and is included in other assets. These loans become due immediately upon termination of employment 

or sale of the shares that are held as collateral. As at December 31, 2012, the shares held as collateral have a market value 

of approximately $16,651 [December 31, 2011 - $16,941].

Other assets include shareholder loans in the amount of $3,054 as at December 31, 2012 [December 31, 2011 - $3,185] issued 

primarily to investment advisors. These amounts are secured primarily by common shares of CI that are held as collateral.  

These loans become due immediately either on termination of the advisor relationship or upon the sale of CI shares that 

are held as collateral. As at December 31, 2012, the shares held as collateral have a market value of approximately $3,769 

[December 31, 2011 - $3,190].

CI  has  a  hiring  and  retention  incentive  program  whereby  loans  are  extended  to  current  investment  advisors.  These 

loans are initially recorded at their fair value, may bear interest at prescribed rates and are contractually forgiven on a 

straight-line basis over the applicable contractual period, which varies in length from three to seven years. CI utilizes the 

effective interest rate method to amortize the forgiven amount. The forgiven amount is included in selling, general and 

administrative expenses. As at December 31, 2012, loans to investment advisors of $3,670 [December 31, 2011 - $1,576] are 

included in other assets. These loans become due on demand upon termination or breach in the terms of the agreements.

Other income consists mainly of fees received for the administration of third party mutual funds, custody fees, equity 

income, foreign exchange gains (losses) and interest income. Other expenses consist mainly of distribution fees to limited 

partnerships, legal settlements, amortization of debenture transaction costs and capital taxes.

63

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]

December 31, 2012 and 2011

5. LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt consists of the following:

Credit facility 

Bankers’ acceptances 

Prime rate loan 

Debentures 

$250 million, 3.30%, due December 17, 2012 

$200 million, 4.19%, due December 16, 2014 

$300 million, 3.94% until December 13, 2015 and 

  fl oating rate until December 14, 2016 

Long-term debt 

Current portion of long-term debt 

As at 

As at

December 31, 2012 

December 31, 2011

$ 

$

88,000 

8,000 

96,000 

— 

199,536 

298,832 

498,368 

594,368 

24,000 

26,000

7,000

33,000

249,514

199,258

298,583

747,355

780,355

257,763

Credit facility

Effective March 1, 2012, CI renewed its revolving credit facility with two chartered banks and on May 11, 2012 increased the 

amount that may be borrowed under the credit facility to $250 million. Amounts may be borrowed under the facility in 

Canadian dollars through prime rate loans, which bear interest at the greater of the bank’s prime rate and the Canadian 

Deposit Offering Rate plus 1.00%, or bankers’ acceptances, which bear interest at bankers’ acceptance rates plus 0.75%.  

Amounts may also be borrowed in U.S. dollars through base rate loans, which bear interest at the greater of the bank’s 

reference rate for loans made by it in Canada in U.S. funds and the federal funds effective rate plus 1.00%, or LIBOR loans 

which bear interest at LIBOR plus 0.75%.

CI may also borrow under this facility in the form of letters of credit, which bear a fee of 0.75% on any undrawn portion.  

As at December 31, 2012 and 2011, CI had not accessed the facility by way of letters of credit.

64

   
   
   
 
   
   
 
   
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]

December 31, 2012 and 2011

Loans are made by the bank under a 364-day revolving credit facility, the term of which may be extended annually at the 

bank’s option. If the bank elects not to extend the term, 50% of the outstanding principal amount shall be repaid in equal 

quarterly instalments over the following two years, with the remaining 50% of the outstanding principal balance due two 

years following the fi rst quarter-end payment.

The credit facility is fully and unconditionally guaranteed by CI Investments, a wholly owned subsidiary of CI, and may be 

guaranteed by certain other subsidiaries of CI. The credit facility contains a number of fi nancial covenants that require CI 

to meet certain fi nancial ratios and fi nancial condition tests. CI is within its fi nancial covenants with respect to its credit 

facility, which require that the funded debt to annualized earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization 

ratio remain below 2.5:1 and that CI’s assets under management not fall below $40 billion, calculated based on a rolling 

30-day average. There can be no assurance that future borrowings or equity fi nancing will be available to CI or available 

on acceptable terms. 

Debentures

On December 17, 2012, CI repaid $250 million of debentures [the “2012 Debentures”] and on December 16, 2011, CI repaid 

$100 million of fl oating rate debentures [the “Floating Rate Debentures”].

On December 16, 2009, CI entered into interest rate swap agreements with a Canadian chartered bank to swap the semi-

annual fi xed rate payments on the $250 million 2012 Debentures and the $200 million debentures due December 16, 2014 

[the “2014 Debentures”] for fl oating rate payments. Based on the terms of the agreements, CI pays a rate equivalent to the 

three-month Canadian bankers’ acceptance rate plus a spread of 142.4 basis points on the 2012 Debentures and a spread of 

157.6 basis points on the 2014 Debentures. The rates are reset quarterly and paid semi-annually to match the fi xed payment 

obligations of the Debentures. The swap agreements terminate on the maturity date of the respective Debentures unless 

terminated  by  CI  at  an  earlier  date.  The  swap  agreement  on  the  2012  Debentures  terminated  on  the  maturity  date  of 

December 17, 2012. As at December 31, 2012, the fair value of the interest rate swap agreements was an unrealized gain of 

$4,787 [December 31, 2011 - unrealized gain of $9,899] and is included in long-term debt in the consolidated statements of 

fi nancial position.  

For the year ended December 31, 2012, interest expense attributable to the 2012 Debentures, the 2014 Debentures and the 

2016 Debentures was $6,553, $5,722 and $11,820, respectively [2011 - $6,799, $5,740 and $11,885, respectively]. Interest on 

the Floating Rate Debentures was paid at the average three-month bankers’ acceptance rate plus 1.20%. Interest expense 

attributable to the Floating Rate Debentures was $2,385 for the year ended December 31, 2011. 

Issuance costs and the issuance discount are amortized over the term of the Debentures using the effective interest rate 

method. The amortization expense related to the discount and transaction costs for CI’s issued Debentures for the year 

ended December 31, 2012 were $1,013 [2011 - $998] which is included in other expenses.

65

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]

December 31, 2012 and 2011

CI may, at its option, redeem the 2014 Debentures, and CI Investments may, at its option, redeem the 2016 Debentures, in 

whole or in part, from time to time, on not less than 30 nor more than 60 days’ prior notice to the registered holder, at a 

redemption price which is equal to the greater of par or the Government of Canada Yield, plus 41 basis points in the case 

of the 2014 Debentures and 37.5 basis points in the case of the 2016 Debentures. CI considers this embedded prepayment 

option to be closely related to the Debentures and, as such, does not account for it separately as a derivative.

In the event that both a change of control occurs and the rating of the Debentures is lowered to below investment grade, 

defi ned as below BBB- by Standard and Poors and BBB (low) by DBRS Limited, CI will be required to make an offer to 

repurchase all or, at the option of each holder, any part of each holder’s Debentures at a purchase price payable in cash 

equivalent to 101% of the outstanding principal amount of the Debentures together with accrued and unpaid interest, to 

the date of purchase. 

The 2014 Debentures are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by CI Investments and may be guaranteed by certain other 

subsidiaries of CI. The 2016 Debentures are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by CI.  

6. PROVISION FOR OTHER LIABILITIES AND CONTINGENCIES

CI is a party to a number of claims, proceedings and investigations, including legal, regulatory and tax, in the ordinary 

course of its business. Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in these matters, it is diffi cult to predict the fi nal outcome 

or the amount and timing of any outfl ow related to such matters. Based on current information and consultations with 

advisors, CI does not expect the outcome of these matters, individually or in aggregate, to have a material adverse effect 

on its fi nancial position or on its ability to continue normal business operations.

CI has made provisions based on current information and the probable resolution of any such claims, proceedings and 

investigations. The movement in amounts provided for contingent liabilities and related expenses during the years ended 

December 31, are as follows:

Provision for other liabilities, beginning of year 

Additions 

Amounts used 

Unused amounts reversed 

Provision for other liabilities, end of year 

Current portion of provision for other liabilities 

66

2012 

$ 

8,947 

1,659 

(2,319) 

(579) 

7,708 

1,097 

2011

$

11,428

1,417

(1,597)

(2,301) 

8,947

2,417

   
   
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]

December 31, 2012 and 2011

CI maintains insurance policies that may provide coverage against certain claims. Amounts receivable under these policies 

are  not  accrued  for  unless  the  realization  of  income  is  virtually  certain.  During  the  year  ended  December  31,  2011,  CI 

received insurance proceeds of $16,004 related to the settlement of legal claims for 2011 and prior years [2012 – nil]. At 

December 31, 2012, CI has accrued $475 for amounts to be received under insurance policies [2011 - $40], which is included 

in accounts receivable.

Litigation

CI is a defendant to two class action lawsuits related to events and transactions that gave rise to a settlement agreement 

with the Ontario Securities Commission in 2004. Although CI continues to believe that this settlement fully compensated 

investors  affected  by  frequent  trading  activity,  a  provision  has  been  made  based  on  the  probable  resolution  of  these 

claims and related expenses.

Taxation 

CI is subject to various uncertainties concerning the interpretation and application of Canadian tax laws. If tax authorities 

disagree with CI’s application of such tax laws, CI’s profi tability and cash fl ows could be adversely affected. CI Investments 

is  considered  a  large  case  fi le  by  the  Canada  Revenue  Agency,  and  as  such,  is  subject  to  audit  each  year.  There  is  a 

signifi cant lag between the end of a fi scal year and when such audits are completed. Therefore, at any given time, several 

years may be open for audit and/or adjustment.

67

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]

December 31, 2012 and 2011

7. SHARE CAPITAL

A summary of the changes to CI’s share capital is as follows:

[A] AUTHORIZED AND ISSUED

Common Shares 

Authorized

An unlimited number of common shares of CI

Issued

Number of shares 

Stated value

[in thousands]  

$

Common shares, balance, December 31, 2010 

287,434 

1,984,488

Issuance of share capital on vesting of deferred equity units 

  and exercise of share options 

Share repurchase 

Common shares, balance, December 31, 2011 

Issuance of share capital on exercise of share options 

Share repurchase 

Common shares, balance, December 31, 2012 

863 

(4,730) 

283,567 

722 

(1,374) 

282,915 

12,575

(32,729)

1,964,334

9,633

(9,534)

1,964,433

During  the  year  ended  December  31,  2012,  1,374,300  shares  [2011  -  4,729,800  shares]  were  repurchased  under  a  normal 

course  issuer  bid  at  an  average  cost  of  $22.22  per  share  [2011  -  $20.13  per  share]  for  total  consideration  of  $30,534 

[2011 - $95,194]. Defi cit was increased by $21,000 [2011 - $62,465] for the cost of the shares repurchased in excess of their 

stated value.

[B] EMPLOYEE INCENTIVE SHARE OPTION PLAN

CI has an employee incentive share option plan [the “Share Option Plan”], as amended and restated, for the executives 

and key employees of CI.    

68

   
   
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]

December 31, 2012 and 2011

During the year, CI granted 2,232,412 options [2011 - 1,577,170 options] to employees. The fair value method of accounting is 

used for the valuation of the 2012 and 2011 share option grants. Compensation expense is recognized over the three-year 

vesting period, assuming an estimated forfeiture rate of 0% to 1.4%, [options issued 2011 – 0% to 1%], with an offset to 

contributed surplus. When exercised, amounts originally recorded against contributed surplus as well as any consideration 

paid by the option holder is credited to share capital. The fair value of the 2012 and 2011 option grants was estimated using 

the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

Year of grant 

# of options grants [in thousands] 

2012 

243 

2012 

1,989 

2011 

370 

2011

1,207

Dividend yield 

4.892% – 5.257% 

4.837% – 5.197% 

4.514% – 4.833% 

4.702% – 5.035%

Expected volatility (*) 

18% 

18% 

20% 

20%

Risk-free interest rate 

1.335% – 1.439% 

1.374% – 1.528% 

2.276% – 2.637% 

2.202% – 2.592%

Expected life [years] 

Forfeiture rate 

2.7 – 4.0 

0% 

2.7 – 4.0 

1.4% 

3.0 – 4.2 

0% 

3.0 – 4.2

1%

Fair value per stock option 

$1.81 – $2.01 

$1.84 – $2.06 

$2.40 – $2.71 

$2.26 – $2.54

Exercise price 

$21.73 

$21.98 

$22.45 

$21.55

(*)  Based on the historical volatility of CI’s share price 

The maximum number of shares that may be issued under the Share Option Plan is 14,000,000 shares. As at December 31, 

2012, there are 6,363,963 shares [2011 - 6,018,092 shares] reserved for issuance on exercise of share options. These options 

vest over periods of up to fi ve years, may be exercised at prices ranging from $11.60 to $22.45 per share and expire at dates 

up to 2017.

69

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]

December 31, 2012 and 2011

A summary of the changes in the Share Option Plan is as follows: 

Options outstanding, December 31, 2010 

Options exercisable, December 31, 2010 

Options granted 

Options exercised (*) 

Options cancelled 

Options outstanding, December 31, 2011 

Options exercisable, December 31, 2011 

Options granted 

Options exercised (*) 

Options cancelled 

Options outstanding, December 31, 2012 

Options exercisable, December 31, 2012 

Number of options 

exercise price  

Weighted average 

[in thousands] 

6,270 

727 

1,577 

(1,665) 

(164) 

6,018 

1,585 

2,232 

(1,777) 

(109) 

6,364 

2,418 

$

15.50

13.52

21.76

12.90

18.02

17.80

15.96

21.95

13.32

21.05

20.45

18.34

(*)  Weighted-average share price of options exercised was $22.15 during the year 2012 [2011 – $21.68]

The equity-based compensation expense under the Share Option Plan for the year ended December 31, 2012 of $3,886 

[2011 - $7,000] has been included in selling, general and administrative expenses.

70

   
 
   
   
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]

December 31, 2012 and 2011

Options outstanding and exercisable as at December 31, 2012 are as follows:  

Exercise price 

options outstanding 

remaining contractual life 

options exercisable

Number of  

Weighted average 

Number of 

$ 

11.60 

12.57 

15.59 

18.20 

19.48 

21.27 

21.55 

21.73 

21.98 

22.45 

11.60 to 22.45 

[in thousands] 

[years] 

[in thousands]

503 

153 

120 

135 

89 

1,714 

1,081 

243 

1,956 

370 

6,364 

1.2 

0.9 

1.3 

1.4 

2.4 

2.2 

3.1 

4.4 

4.1 

3.2 

2.9 

503

153

120

135

24

1,029

331

––

––

123

2,418

71

   
 
  
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]

December 31, 2012 and 2011

[C] BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

The  following  table  presents  the  calculation  of  basic  and  diluted  earnings  per  common  share  for  the  years  ended 

December 31:

[in thousands] 

Numerator:

2012  

2011

Net income – basic and diluted 

$352,163 

$376,899

Denominator:

Weighted average number of common shares – basic 

Weighted average effect of dilutive stock options (*) 

Weighted average number of common shares – diluted 

Net earnings per common share

Basic 

Diluted 

283,390  

640  

284,030  

$1.24  

$1.24  

286,998

1,202

288,200

$1.31

$1.31

(*)  The determination of the weighted average number of common shares – diluted excludes nil shares related to stock options that 

were anti-dilutive for the year ended December 31, 2012 [and 3,393 thousand shares for the year ended December 31, 2011].

[D] MAXIMUM SHARE DILUTION

The following table presents the maximum number of shares that would be outstanding if all the outstanding options as 

at January 31, 2013 were exercised and outstanding:

[in thousands]  

Shares outstanding at January 31, 2013 

Options to purchase shares 

283,193

5,029

288,222

72

 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]

December 31, 2012 and 2011

8. DIVIDENDS

The following dividends were paid by CI during the year ended December 31, 2012:

Record date 

Payment date 

December 31, 2011 

January 31, 2012 

February 29, 2012 

March 31, 2012 

April 30, 2012 

May 31, 2012 

June 30, 2012 

July 31, 2012 

August 31, 2012 

September 30, 2012 

October 31, 2012 

November 30, 2012 

Paid during the year ended December 31, 2012 

January 13, 2012 

February 15, 2012 

March 15, 2012 

April 13, 2012 

May 15, 2012 

June 15, 2012 

July 13, 2012 

August 15, 2012 

September 14, 2012 

October 15, 2012 

November 15, 2012 

December 14, 2012 

Cash dividend 

Total dividend

per share 

 $ 

0.075 

0.075 

0.08 

0.08 

0.08 

0.08 

0.08 

0.08 

0.08 

0.08 

0.08 

0.08 

amount

$

21,220

21,274

22,703

22,698

22,705

22,666

22,667

22,668

22,647

22,648

22,646

22,642

269,184

The following dividends were declared but not paid by CI during the year ended December 31, 2012:  

Record date 

December 31, 2012 

January 31, 2013 

Declared and accrued as at December 31, 2012 

Cash dividend 

Total dividend

Payment date 

January 15, 2013 

February 15, 2013 

per share 

 $ 

0.08 

0.08 

amount

$

22,627

22,627

45,254

73

   
  
   
 
 
 
   
  
   
 
 
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]

December 31, 2012 and 2011

The following dividends were paid by CI during the year ended December 31, 2011:

Cash dividend 

Total dividend

Record date 

Payment date 

December 31, 2010 

January 31, 2011 

February 28, 2011 

March 31, 2011 

April 30, 2011 

May 31, 2011 

June 30, 2011 

July 31, 2011 

August 31, 2012 

September 30, 2012 

October 31, 2012 

November 30, 2012 

January 14, 2011 

February 15, 2011 

March 15, 2011 

April 15, 2011 

May 13, 2011 

June 15, 2011 

July 15, 2011 

August 15, 2011 

September 15, 2012 

October 14, 2012 

November 15, 2012 

December 15, 2012 

per share 

 $ 

0.07 

0.07 

0.07 

0.075 

0.075 

0.075 

0.075 

0.075 

0.075 

0.075 

0.075 

0.075 

Paid during the year ended December 31, 2011 

The following dividends were declared but not paid by CI during the year ended  December 31, 2011:

amount

$

20,146

20,179

20,183

21,615

21,620

21,632

21,634

21,501

21,569

21,500

21,324

21,298

254,201

Record date 

Payment date 

per share $ 

dividend amount $

Cash dividend 

Total 

December 31, 2011 

January 31, 2012 

Declared and accrued as at December 31, 2011 

January 13, 2012  

February 15, 2012 

0.075 

0.075 

21,263

21,263

42,526

74

   
  
   
 
 
 
   
  
 
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]

December 31, 2012 and 2011

9. INCOME TAXES

[a]  The following are the major components of income tax expense for the years ended December 31:

Statement of Income

  Current income tax expense 

    Based on taxable income of the current year 

    Adjustments in respect of prior years    

  Deferred income tax expense  

    Origination and reversal of temporary differences 

    Other 

Income tax expense reported in the statement of income 

Statement of Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) 

  Deferred income taxes 

    Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale fi nancial assets 

    Reversal of losses to net income on available-for-sale fi nancial assets 

Income tax expense (recovery) reported in other comprehensive income (loss) 

2012 

$ 

136,653 

(2,561) 

134,092 

17,417 

105 

17,522 

151,614 

287 

19 

306 

2011

$

132,387

(967)

131,420

12,203

548

12,751

144,171

(449)

125

(324)

[b]  The following is a reconciliation between CI’s statutory and effective income tax rates for the years ended December 31:

Combined Canadian federal and provincial income tax rate 

Increase (decrease) in income taxes resulting from 

  Impact of rate changes on deferred income taxes 

  Recovery of prior years’ provisions for settled tax items 

  Other, net 

2012 

% 

26.5 

3.6 

(0.5) 

0.5 

30.1 

2011

%

28.2

(1.0)

0.4

0.1 

27.7

75

   
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
   
   
 
   
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]

December 31, 2012 and 2011

[c]  Deferred income taxes refl ect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and 

liabilities for fi nancial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Signifi cant components of CI’s 

deferred income tax liabilities and assets are as follows at December 31, 2012:

Recognized 

in other 

As at 

Recognized in  

comprehensive 

As at 

December 31, 2011  

net income  

income (loss) December 31, 2012 

$ 

$ 

261,732 

122,854 

384,586 

6,104 

8,140 

2,174 

6,966 

23,384 

361,202 

12,885 

(5,135) 

7,750 

(5,070) 

(3,222) 

(305) 

(1,175) 

(9,772) 

17,522 

$ 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

(306) 

(306) 

306 

$

274,617

117,719

392,336

1,034

4,918

1,869

5,485

13,306

379,030

Deferred income tax liabilities 

Fund contracts 

Deferred sales commissions 

Total deferred income tax liabilities 

Deferred income tax assets

Equity-based compensation  

Non-capital loss carryforwards 

Provisions for other liabilities 

Other 

Total deferred income tax assets 

Net deferred income tax liabilities 

76

   
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
   
   
   
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]

December 31, 2012 and 2011

Signifi cant components of CI’s deferred income tax liabilities and assets are as follows at December 31, 2011:

Recognized 

in other 

As at 

Recognized in  

comprehensive 

As at 

December 31, 2010  

net income  

income (loss) December 31, 2011 

$ 

$ 

264,831 

132,874 

397,705 

6,576 

32,652 

2,609 

7,093 

48,930 

348,775 

(3,099) 

(10,020) 

(13,119) 

(472) 

(24,512) 

(435) 

(451) 

(25,870) 

12,751 

$ 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

324 

324 

(324) 

$

261,732

122,854

384,586

6,104

8,140

2,174

6,966

23,384

361,202

Deferred income tax liabilities 

Fund contracts 

Deferred sales commissions 

Total deferred income tax liabilities 

Deferred income tax assets

Equity-based compensation  

Non-capital loss carryforwards 

Provisions for other liabilities 

Other 

Total deferred income tax assets 

Net deferred income tax liabilities 

The  ultimate  realization  of  deferred  tax  assets  is  dependent  upon  future  taxable  profi ts  during  the  periods  in  which 

those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the expected reversal of deferred tax liabilities 

and projected future taxable income in making this assessment. Based upon the level of historical taxable income and 

projections  for  future  taxable  income  over  the  periods  in  which  the  deferred  tax  assets  are  deductible,  management 

believes it is probable that CI will realize the benefi ts of these deductible differences.

10. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Financial assets are classifi ed into three categories, FVPL, loans and receivables and available-for sale. As at December 31, 2012, 

FVPL assets include cash and cash equivalents carried at fair value and classifi ed as Level 1 fair value hierarchy of $24,137 

[December 31, 2011 - $122,550,]. The carrying amount of loans and receivables include client and trust funds on deposit 

of $127,712 [December 31, 2011 - $124,978 ], accounts receivable of $62,585 [December 31, 2011 - $63,300] and other assets 

of $18,252 [December 31, 2011 - $18,184]. AFS assets as at December 31, 2012 include CI’s marketable securities of $66,155 

carried at fair value of which $26,875 have been classifi ed in the Level 1 fair value hierarchy and $39,280 in the Level 2 fair 

value hierarchy, respectively [December 31, 2011 - $42,099 and $25,798 in the Level 1 fair value hierarchy and $16,301 in the 

Level 2 fair value hierarchy, respectively].  

77

   
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
   
   
   
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]

December 31, 2012 and 2011

Financial liabilities are classifi ed into two categories, FVPL and other liabilities. Included in accounts payable and accrued 

liabilities  as  at  December  31,  2012  is  $2,940  classifi ed  as  Level  1  fair  value  hierarchy  [December  31,  2011  –  $460].  Other 

liabilities include accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $115,250 [December 31, 2011 - $118,745], dividends payable of 

$45,254 [December 31, 2011 - $42,526] and long-term debt of $594,368 [December 31, 2011 - $780,355]. 

For all other fi nancial assets and fi nancial liabilities, the carrying value approximates fair value due to the short-term nature 

of these instruments.

11. RISK MANAGEMENT

Risk  management  is  an  integrated  process  with  independent  oversight.  CI’s  management  and  compliance  group  has 

established  a  control  environment  that  ensures  risks  are  reviewed  regularly  and  that  risk  controls  throughout  CI  are 

operating in accordance with regulatory requirements. CI’s senior management takes an active role in the risk management 

process  by  reviewing  policies  and  procedures  within  each  business  segment  and  assessing  and  mitigating  the  various 

fi nancial risks that could impact CI’s fi nancial position and results of operations.

CI’s fi nancial instruments bear the following fi nancial risks:

[A] MARKET RISK

Market  risk  is  the  risk  of  a  fi nancial  loss  resulting  from  adverse  changes  in  underlying  market  factors,  such  as  interest 

rates, foreign exchange rates, and equity prices. Management of CI’s market risk is the responsibility of the Chief Financial 

Offi cer.  The  corporate  fi nance  group  reviews  the  exposure  to  interest  rate  risk,  foreign  currency  risk  and  equity  risk 

by  identifying,  monitoring  and  reporting  potential  market  risks  to  the  Chief  Financial  Offi cer.  A  description  of  each 

component of market risk is described below:

Interest rate risk is the risk of gain or loss due to the volatility of interest rates.
Foreign exchange risk is the risk of gain or loss due to volatility of foreign exchange rates.
 Equity risk is the risk of gain or loss due to the changes in the prices and the volatility of individual equity instruments 

and equity indexes.

CI’s fi nancial performance is indirectly exposed to market risk. Any decline in fi nancial markets or lack of sustained growth 

in  such  markets  may  result  in  a  corresponding  decline  in  the  performance  and  may  adversely  affect  CI’s  assets  under 

management and fi nancial results.

78

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]

December 31, 2012 and 2011

[i]  Interest rate risk

Interest rate risk arises from the possibility that changes in interest rates will affect the value of fi nancial instruments.  

Fluctuations in interest rates have a direct impact on the interest payments CI makes on its long-term debt.  

Debt outstanding on CI’s credit facility of $96,000 [2011 - $33,000] is borrowed at a fl oating interest rate. The existing 

credit facility provides CI with the option of fi xing interest rates, should CI change its view on its exposure to rising interest 

rates. As at December 31, 2012, CI also has $500,000 fi xed interest rate Debentures [2011 - $750,000]. In 2009 CI entered 

into interest rate swap agreements with a Canadian chartered bank to convert the fi xed interest rates on $250,000 of the 

2012 Debentures and $200,000 of the 2014 Debentures to fl oating interest rates.  

Based on the amount borrowed under the credit facility and Debentures outstanding as at December 31, 2012, each 0.50% 

increase or decrease in interest rates would result in annual interest expense increasing or decreasing by $1.5 million [2011 

- $2.4 million], respectively.

[ii]  Foreign exchange risk

As at December 31, 2012, net fi nancial assets of $8 million [2011 - $7 million] were denominated in U.S. currency. A 10% 

increase  or  decrease  in  U.S.  exchange  rates  would  result  in  a  foreign  exchange  gain  or  loss  of  $0.8  million  [2011  -  $0.7 

million], respectively. CI may enter into forward contracts to manage its foreign exchange exposure.

[iii]  Equity risk

CI’s  marketable  securities  as  at  December  31,  2012  of  $66,155  [2011  -  $42,099]  are  exposed  to  equity  risk.  Based  on  the 

carrying amount of these assets, an increase or decrease in equity market prices by 10% would result in estimated gains 

or losses of $6.6 million [2011 - $4.2 million], respectively.

[B] LIQUIDITY RISK

Liquidity risk arises from the possibility that CI will encounter diffi culties in meeting its fi nancial obligations as they fall 

due. CI manages its liquidity risk through a combination of cash received from operations as well as borrowings under its 

revolving credit facility. Liquidity is monitored through a daily cash management process that includes the projection of 

cash fl ows to ensure CI meets its funding obligations.

79

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]

December 31, 2012 and 2011

CI’s liabilities have contractual maturities, excluding interest payments, as follows:

Total 

$ 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 

119,721 

Dividends payable 

Client and trust funds payable 

Long-term debt 

Total 

45,254 

125,773 

596,000 

886,748 

2013 

$ 

119,721 

45,254 

125,773 

 24,000 

314,748 

2014 

$ 

— 

— 

— 

224,000 

224,000 

2015 

$ 

— 

— 

— 

48,000 

48,000 

2016

$

—

—

—

300,000

300,000

[C] CREDIT RISK

Credit risk arises from the potential that investors, clients or counterparties fail to satisfy their obligations.

As at December 31, 2012, fi nancial assets of $208,549 [2011 - $206,462], represented by client and trust funds on deposit of 

$127,712 [2011 - $124,978], accounts receivable of $62,585 [2011 - $63,300] and other assets of $18,252 [2011 - $18,184], were 

exposed to credit risk.  CI does not have a signifi cant exposure to any individual counterparty. Credit risk is mitigated by 

regularly monitoring the credit performance of each individual counterparty and holding collateral, where appropriate.

Client  and  trust  funds  on  deposit  consist  mainly  of  cash  deposits  or  unsettled  trade  receivables.  CI  may  also  extend 

amounts to clients on a margin basis for security purchases. Collateral is provided in margin accounts by each client in 

the form of securities purchased and/or other securities and cash balances. The credit extended is limited by regulatory 

requirements and by CI’s internal credit policy. Credit risk is managed by dealing with counterparties CI believes to be 

creditworthy and by actively monitoring credit and margin exposure and the fi nancial health of the counterparties.

Credit risk associated with accounts receivable is limited as the balance primarily consists of trade receivables that are 

outstanding for less than 90 days.

Other assets primarily represent loans granted under CI’s employee share purchase plan and loans extended to investment 

advisors  under  CI’s  hiring  and  incentive  program.  Employee  loans  are  collateralized  by  CI  shares  and  become  due 

immediately upon termination of the employee or upon the sale of the shares held as collateral. Commissions may be 

used to offset loan amounts made to investment advisors in the event of default. Credit risk associated with other assets 

is limited given the nature of the relationship with the counterparties.

80

   
   
   
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]

December 31, 2012 and 2011

12. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

CI’s objectives in managing capital are to maintain a capital structure that allows CI to meet its growth strategies and build 

long-term shareholder value, while satisfying its fi nancial obligations and meeting its long-term debt covenants.

CI’s capital is comprised of shareholders’ equity and long-term debt [including current portion of long-term debt]. CI’s 

senior management is responsible for the management of capital. CI’s Board of Directors is responsible for reviewing and 

approving CI’s capital policy and management.

CI and its subsidiaries are subject to minimum regulatory capital requirements whereby suffi cient cash and other liquid 

assets must be on hand to maintain capital requirements rather than using them in connection with its business. Failure 

to maintain required regulatory capital by CI may result in fi nes, suspension or revocation of registration by the relevant 

securities regulator. As at December 31, 2012 and 2011, CI met its capital requirements.

CI’s capital consists of the following:

As at 

As at

December 31, 2012 

December 31, 2011

$ 

$

1,675,988 

594,368 

2,270,356 

1,620,185

 780,355

2,400,540

Shareholders’ equity 

Long-term debt 

Total capital 

13. COMMITMENTS

Lease commitments

CI has entered into leases relating to the rental of offi ce premises and computer equipment. CI has the option to renew 

certain leases. The approximate future minimum annual rental payments under such leases are as follows:

2013 

2014 

2015 

2016 

2017 

2018 and thereafter 

$

11,030

9,621

9,054

 8,989

 8,574

57,604

81

 
   
   
   
   
   
 
   
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]

December 31, 2012 and 2011

Advisor services agreements

CI  is  a  party  to  certain  advisor  services  agreements,  which  provide  that  the  advisor  has  the  option  to  require  CI  to 

purchase a practice that cannot otherwise be transitioned to a qualifi ed buyer. The purchase price would be in accordance 

with a pre-determined formula contained in the advisor services agreements.

Indemnities

CI  has  agreed  to  indemnify  its  directors  and  offi cers,  and  certain  of  its  employees  in  accordance  with  its  by-laws. 

CI maintains insurance policies that may provide coverage against certain claims.

14. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS 

The Bank of Nova Scotia [“Scotiabank”] owns approximately 37% of the common shares of CI, and is therefore considered a 

related party. CI has entered into transactions related to the advisory and distribution of its mutual funds with Scotiabank 

and its related parties. These transactions are in the normal course of operations and are recorded at the agreed upon 

exchange  amounts.  During  the  year  ended  December  31,  2012,  CI  incurred  charges  for  deferred  sales  commissions  of 

$4,926  and  trailer  fees  of  $20,278,  respectively  [2011  -  $4,896  and  $19,978,  respectively]  which  were  paid  or  payable  to 

Scotiabank and its related parties. The balance payable to Scotiabank and its related parties as at December 31, 2012 of 

$1,745 [December 31, 2011 - $1,681] is included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities.

Scotiabank was the provider of and administrative agent for CI’s revolving credit facility during the period January 1, 2011 

to March 17, 2011. During the period January 1, 2011 to March 17, 2011, interest and stamping fees of $389 were recorded as 

interest expense.

Also, on December 16, 2009, CI entered into an interest rate swap agreement with Scotiabank as described in Note 5.

82

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]

December 31, 2012 and 2011

15. SEGMENTED INFORMATION

CI  has  two  reportable  segments:  Asset  Management  and  Asset  Administration.  These  segments  refl ect  CI’s  internal 

fi nancial reporting and performance measurement.

The Asset Management segment includes the operating results and fi nancial position of CI Investments and CI Private 

Counsel LP, which derive their revenues principally from the fees earned on the management of several families of mutual 

and segregated funds.

The  Asset  Administration  segment  includes  the  operating  results  and  fi nancial  position  of  AWM  and  its  subsidiaries, 

including  Assante  Capital  Management  Ltd.  and  Assante  Financial  Management  Ltd.  These  companies  derive  their 

revenues principally from commissions and fees earned on the sale of mutual funds and other fi nancial products, and 

ongoing service to clients.

83

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]

December 31, 2012 and 2011

Segmented information as at and for the year ended December 31, 2012 is as follows:  

Asset 

Asset 

Intersegment 

management 

administration 

eliminations 

$ 

$ 

$ 

Total

$

  1,277,698  

 —  

 39,051  

 1,316,749  

  233,285  

  389,066  

 —  

 220,722  

 15,008  

 235,730  

 52,724  

 —  

 —  

 174,464  

 —  

 1,277,698   

 (94,737) 

 —  

 125,985    

 54,059    

 (94,737) 

 1,457,742    

 —  

 (15,112) 

 (76,201) 

 286,009    

 373,954    

 98,263   

  168,110  

 2,029  

 1,562  

 3,236  

 (4,135) 

 165,537     

 —  

 5,265     

 792,490  

 231,986  

 (95,448) 

 929,028   

 524,259  

 3,744  

 711  

 528,714   

(24,937)

(151,614)

 352,163 

  599,957  

 264,359  

 (11,709) 

 852,607    

  927,344  

 192,582  

— 

 — 

— 

 1,119,926     

999,082

456,941 

(11,709) 

 2,971,615 

999,082 

2,526,383 

Management fees 

Administration fees 

Other revenue 

Total revenue 

Selling, general and administrative 

Trailer fees 

Investment dealer fees 

Amortization of deferred sales 

  commissions and intangibles 

Other expenses 

Total expenses 

Income before income taxes

  and non-segmented items 

Interest expense 

Provision for income taxes 

Net income for the year 

Identifi able assets 

Indefi nite life intangibles 

  Goodwill 

  Fund contracts 

Total assets 

84

   
   
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]

December 31, 2012 and 2011

Segmented information as at and for the year ended December 31, 2011 is as follows:  

Management fees 

Administration fees 

Other revenue 

Total revenue 

Selling, general and administrative 

Trailer fees 

Investment dealer fees 

Amortization of deferred sales 

  commissions and intangibles 

Other expenses 

Total expenses 

Income before income taxes

  and non-segmented items 

Interest expense 

Provision for income taxes 

Net income for the year 

Identifi able assets 

Indefi nite life intangibles 

  Goodwill 

  Fund contracts 

Total assets 

Asset 

Asset 

Intersegment 

management 

administration 

eliminations 

$ 

$ 

$ 

Total

$

  1,302,773  

 —  

 45,558  

 1,348,331  

  235,938  

  394,059  

 —  

 226,179  

 15,690  

 241,869  

 54,838  

 —  

 —  

 179,529  

 —  

 1,302,773   

 (93,907) 

 —  

 132,272    

 61,248    

 (93,907) 

 1,496,293    

 —  

 (14,605) 

 (75,776) 

 290,776    

 379,454    

 103,753   

  169,665  

 4,178  

 1,504  

 2,749  

 (4,352) 

 166,817     

 —  

 6,927     

 803,840  

 238,620  

 (94,733) 

 947,727   

 544,491  

 3,249  

 826  

 548,566   

(27,496)

(144,171)

 376,899 

  731,810  

 246,536  

 (12,372) 

 965,974    

  927,344  

 192,582  

— 

 — 

— 

 1,119,926     

999,082

999,082 

2,658,236 

439,118 

(12,372) 

 3,084,982 

85

   
   
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]

December 31, 2012 and 2011

16. COMPENSATION OF KEY MANAGEMENT

The remuneration of directors and other key management personnel of CI during the years ended December 31, is as follows:

Salaries 

Equity-based compensation 

Total 

17. FUTURE ACCOUNTING CHANGES

2012 

$ 

10,746 

 878 

11,624 

2011

$

9,887

1,365

11,252

CI is currently evaluating the impact the following new standards issued by the IASB will have on its fi nancial statements. 

CI will has not yet determined whether to early adopt IFRS 9 – Financial Instruments.

International Accounting Standard 

IFRS 10 – Consolidated Financial Statements 

IFRS 12 – Disclosures of Interests in Other Entities 

IFRS 13 – Fair Value Measurement 

IFRS 9 – Financial Instruments 

Issue Date 

May 12, 2011 

May 12, 2011 

May 12, 2011 

November 12, 2009 

Effective Date

January 1, 2013

January 1, 2013

January 1, 2013

January 1, 2015

IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements (“IFRS 10”) replaces the consolidation requirements in SIC-12, Consolidation – Special 

Purpose Entities and IAS 27, Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements. IFRS 10 builds on existing principles by identifying 

the concept of control as the determining factor in whether an entity should be included within the consolidated fi nancial 

statements of the parent company.

IFRS  12  Disclosures  of  Interests  in  Other  Entities  establishes  disclosure  requirements  for  interests  in  other  entities,  including 

subsidiaries,  joint  arrangements,  associates  and  unconsolidated  structured  entities.  The  standard  carries  forward  existing 

disclosures and also introduces signifi cant additional disclosure requirements that address the nature of, and risks associated 

with, an entity’s interest in other entities.

86

   
   
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts]

December 31, 2012 and 2011

IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement establishes the defi nition of fair value and sets out a single IFRS framework for measuring fair 

value and the required disclosures.

IFRS 9 Financial Instruments (“IFRS 9”) will replace IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement (“IAS 39”). IFRS 9 

uses a single approach to determine whether a fi nancial asset is measured at amortized cost or fair value, replacing the multiple 

rules in IAS 39. The approach in IFRS 9 is based on how an entity manages its fi nancial instruments in the context of its business 

model and the contractual cash fl ow characteristics of the fi nancial assets. The new standard also requires a single impairment 

method to be used, replacing the multiple impairment methods in IAS 39.  

18. COMPARATIVE FIGURES

Certain comparative fi gures have been reclassifi ed to conform to the consolidated fi nancial statement presentation in the 

current year.

87

Corporate Directory

CI Financial 

DIRECTORS

Ronald D. Besse
President, 
Besseco Holdings Inc.;
Lead Director
Toronto, Ontario

Stephen A. MacPhail
President and 
Chief Executive Offi cer,
CI Financial;
Director
Toronto, Ontario

OFFICERS

G. Raymond Chang
President, 
G. Raymond Chang Ltd.; 
Director 
Toronto, Ontario

Stephen T. Moore
Managing Director, 
Newhaven Asset 
Management Inc.; 
Director
Toronto, Ontario

Paul W. Derksen
Corporate Director;
Director
Clarksburg, Ontario

Tom P. Muir
Co-Managing Director, 
Muir Detlefsen & Associates 
Limited; 
Director 
Toronto, Ontario

William T. Holland
Chairman; 
Director
Toronto, Ontario

A. Winn Oughtred
Corporate Director;
Director
Toronto, Ontario 

Clay Horner
Partner, 
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP; 
Director 
Toronto, Ontario

David J. Riddle
President, 
C-Max Capital Inc.; 
Director
Vancouver, B.C.

Stephen A. MacPhail
President and 
Chief Executive Offi cer

Sheila A. Murray
Executive Vice-President, 
General Counsel and Secretary

Douglas J. Jamieson
Senior Vice-President and
Chief Financial Offi cer

David C. Pauli
Executive Vice-President and 
Chief Operating Offi cer

CI Investments

EXECUTIVES

Derek J. Green
President

Douglas J. Jamieson
Senior Vice-President and 
Chief Financial Offi cer

David C. Pauli 
Executive Vice-President and
Chief Operating Offi cer

Chris von Boetticher
Vice-President, 
General Counsel and Secretary

Assante Wealth Management

EXECUTIVES

Steven J. Donald
President

James E. Ross
Senior Vice-President,
Wealth & Estate Planning

Robert J. Dorrell
Senior Vice-President,
Distribution Services

88

Corporate Information

Head Office

2 Queen Street East 
Twentieth Floor
Toronto, Ontario  M5C 3G7
Telephone: 416-364-1145
Toll Free: 1 800 268-9374
www.cifi nancial.com

Administration Office

15 York Street
Second Floor
Toronto, Ontario  M5J 0A3

Investor Relations

Contact: Douglas J. Jamieson, Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Offi cer
Telephone: 416-364-1145
Toll Free: 1 800 268-9374
E-mail: investorrelations@ci.com

Trading Symbol

CI Financial trades on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol “CIX”.

Auditors

Ernst & Young LLP
Chartered Accountants
Toronto-Dominion Centre
P.O. Box 251
Toronto, Ontario  M5K 1J7

Registrar and Transfer Agent

Computershare Investor Services Inc.
9th Floor, 100 University Avenue
Toronto, Ontario  M5J 2Y1
Telephone: 1 800 564-6253 
E-mail: caregistry@computershare.com

Normal Course Issuer Bid

Effective May 29, 2012, the Toronto Stock Exchange accepted CI’s notice of 
intention to commence a normal course issuer bid (the “Notice”) through the 
facilities of the Toronto Stock Exchange. Under the bid, CI may purchase up 
to 6,000,000 Shares at the prevailing market price. Purchases under the bid 
will terminate no later than May 28, 2013. As of March 31, 2013, CI has acquired 
an aggregate of 528,100 Shares under the normal course issuer bid at an average 
price of $22.80 per Share. Shareholders may obtain a copy of the Notice, without 
charge, by contacting the Corporate Secretary of CI. The Corporation intends to 
renew its Normal Course Issuer Bid effective May 29, 2013, subject to receipt of 
approval from the Toronto Stock Exchange.

Shareholder rights plan

The Corporation entered into an agreement (the “Rights Plan Agreement”) dated 
as of January 1, 2009 with Computershare Investor Services Inc., as rights agent, 
in connection with the adoption of a shareholder rights plan (the “Rights Plan”). 
The Corporation obtained the approval to amend and continue the Rights Plan 
for a further term of three years, at the annual and special meeting of shareholders 
held on June 1, 2011. Accordingly, the Rights Plan will terminate at the close of the 
annual meeting of shareholders in 2014. The Notice of Meeting and Management 
Information Circular of the Corporation dated May 2, 2011 includes a summary 
of the Amended and Restated Rights Plan approved by the shareholders. The 
complete text may be found on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

Digital Report

This Annual Report can be downloaded from CI’s website at www.cifi nancial.com 
under “Reports”.

89

2012

This  Report  contains  forward-looking  statements  with  respect  to  CI,  including  its  business  operations  and  strategy  and  fi nancial 

performance and condition. Although management believes that the expectations refl ected in such forward-looking statements are 

reasonable, such statements involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by 

such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause results to differ materially include, among other things, general economic 

and market factors, including interest rates, business competition, changes in government regulations or in tax laws, and other factors 

discussed in materials fi led with applicable securities regulatory authorities from time to time. 

1302-0221_E (04/13)