Quarterlytics / Technology / Communication Equipment / Ciena

Ciena

cien · NYSE Technology
Claim this profile
Ticker cien
Exchange NYSE
Sector Technology
Industry Communication Equipment
Employees 5001-10,000
← All annual reports
FY2010 Annual Report · Ciena
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
: the network specialist

“ Today, Ciena is a focused  

player with both global scale  

and industry-leading solutions  

that are well aligned to high-  

growth markets and customer  

network priorities.”

annual report 2010

improved operating leverage

expanded geographic reach

greater investment capacity 

broadened customer relationships

enhanced product portfolio 

accelerating our growth strategy

expanded addressable markets and applications

Ciena is the network specialist. We collaborate with customers worldwide to unlock the strategic potential of their networks 
and fundamentally change the way they perform and compete. With focused innovation, Ciena brings together the reliability 
and capacity of optical networking with the flexibility and economics of Ethernet, unified by a software suite that delivers the 
industry’s leading network automation. 

 Gary B. Smith

A LETTER FROM GARY B. SMITH, PRESIDENT & CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Fiscal 2010 was a momentous and transformative year for our company. We laid the 

foundation of a solid platform for growth by taking bold, strategic steps that significantly 

expanded our operations and strengthened our competitive position in the market-

place. As a result, today Ciena is a focused network specialist with both global scale 

and industry-leading network solutions that are well aligned to high-growth markets 

and customer network priorities. 

Our successful acquisition of Nortel’s Metro Ethernet Networks (MEN) 

business in March 2010 enhanced our leadership and solidified our momentum 

in next-generation, converged optical Ethernet networking. In particular, we 

broadened our product portfolio to include industry-leading, high-capacity 

40G and 100G coherent optical transport solutions and greatly expanded our 

customer relationships and geographic reach – today our 4,000+ employees 

serve over 1,000 customers in more than 60 countries. Our decisive action 

and the rapid and effective integration of our combined operations will 

enable us to realize the desired financial, strategic and operational benefits 

and, ultimately, the success of this acquisition.  As a result of our thorough 

planning and the dedication of our employees, we’ve been able to navigate 

this period with exceptional support for our customers and minimal disruption 

to our operations. 

The market is embracing our solutions portfolio as well as the strategic vision 

of the combined company. With more than $1 billion in revenue in fiscal 2010, 

including 40% through international sales, the global momentum in our 

business is evident. We have also successfully achieved initial synergies in the 

cost structure of the combined operations and believe we can achieve additional 

leverage.  Complementing these financial milestones, we completed a 

number of critical integration activities by fiscal year end and remain on track 

to finalize the integration in 2011.  

#1 

FIBER-BASED ETHERNET ACCESS,  

MARKET SHARE *

TRAFFIC GROWTH IS ACCELERATING 
PETABYTE IN THOUSANDS

H
T
N
O
M

/
E
T
Y
B
A
T
E
P

60

45

30

15

0

  2010  2011 

2012 

2013
Source: Cisco

As we transformed our business and competitive position, we also took steps 

to solidify our capital structure. We successfully completed two issuances of 

convertible notes during fiscal 2010. As a result of these additional funds, we 

exited fiscal 2010 with supplemental liquidity and we lengthened our average 

debt maturity. Strategically, this enables us to continue to invest in and execute 

on our vision for the combined business, positioning us to continue to take 

advantage of evolving market opportunities.

We believe we are in the early stages of a broad, multi-year cycle of network 

transition and optimization. The proliferation of high-bandwidth consumer 

and enterprise applications, including video, mobile broadband and cloud 

computing, continues to place unprecedented pressure on networks 

worldwide. We witness this in our everyday lives with our increasing reliance 

upon a growing set of applications and services.  Just this year we saw some 

incredible developments:

•  Global mobile data traffic grew 68% in only six months … driven by a  

98% increase in video traffic;

• Apple sold three million iPads in just 80 days;

• Facebook claimed to reach 200 million mobile members;

•  NetFlix’s streaming video service, within months of being introduced,  

was consuming an estimated 20% of total internet bandwidth during  

peak time in the US alone;

•  Of the roughly 210 million TV sets sold worldwide, 21% had an  

Internet connection.

This broadening mix of high-bandwidth data and video communications 

services, together with growing mobility and expanding wireless applications, 

will require upgrades to existing network infrastructure to increase capacity, 

add service flexibility, and improve overall performance. 

To that end, next-gen high capacity optical transport and switching as well 

as Carrier Ethernet-based wireless backhaul and business services have all 

been identified as markets targeted for greater investment by carriers in 2011 

and beyond. We see strong alignment of our portfolio with these critical 

network priorities with a solution set that enables our customers to improve 

their competitive positions through the rapid, efficient and profitable delivery 

of new services. In 2011, we plan to exploit that strong market position, 

increased scale and clear technology leadership to take share. We believe 

we have greater opportunity to expand our product footprint within our 

existing customer base while winning new customers around the globe.  

And, our increased scale gives us the ability to more effectively support  

a robust yet focused portfolio as well as a larger customer base.

PAGE 2  ANNUAL REPORT 2010

* Heavy Reading: 4Q 2009 through YTD 2010

18/ 25

SERVING 18 OF THE WORLD’S 25 

LARGEST NETWORK OPERATORS, 

LEADING ENTERPRISES, AND  

GOVERNMENT AGENCIES

15% 

GLOBAL LONG-HAUL AND METRO 

WDM SEGMENTS, MARKET SHARE **

Another industry dynamic that we believe may serve us well in 2011 is customers’ 

growing desire to establish closer and more collaborative relationships with 

their technology vendors, which will drive a global change in our competitive 

landscape toward a smaller set of more strategic suppliers across the industry. 

We believe Ciena’s position as the network specialist with scale resonates in 

such an environment, where we can partner with our customers at a deeper 

level than generalist network suppliers can to solve specific business 

challenges using tailored network technology.

In summary, we made significant progress in 2010 toward realizing our strategic 

vision and creating a new level of influence in the future of networking. With 

a leading position in the shift toward high-capacity, next-generation network 

architectures, we are well placed to benefit from today’s market trends that 

are driving a new wave of high-bandwidth services. We’ve built tremendous 

momentum during 2010 in delivering the network capacity and intelligence 

our customers require to support those growing demands while enabling 

the economics that help drive profitable business models. 

As we look to advance our position in 2011, particularly in our work to complete 

integration activities and deliver on the full value of the combined company, 

we will maximize our commitment to focused innovation and our dedication 

to cultivating strategic relationships that drive operating performance. 

The milestones we have achieved in 2010 and the objectives we are focused 

on for 2011 ultimately come down to our global organization and the dedication 

of the people who execute the plan every day. Many thanks go to our customers, 

partners, employees, and stakeholders who have continued to support Ciena. 

Leveraging the foundation created in 2010, we look forward to another 

successful year as we enable the deployment of the next generation  

of networks. 

Gary B. Smith 
President and Chief Executive Officer

**  Dell’Oro: 4Q 2009 through YTD 2010

ANNUAL REPORT 2010  PAGE 3

delivering solutions in 
60+ countries to more 
than 1,000 companies

500+

NORTH AMERICA

250+

EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST 

AND AFRICA

70+

CARRIBBEAN AND 

LATIN AMERICA

80+

ASIA-PACIFIC

PAGE 4  ANNUAL REPORT 2010

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION  Washington, D.C. 20549 
Form 10-K
Annual Report
Pursuant to Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Mark One) 
[X] 

 Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2010

OR

[X] 

 Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
For the transition period from _______________ to _______________

Commission file number 0-21969

Ciena Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware  
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) 

1201 Winterson Road, Linthicum, MD  
(Address of principal executive offices) 

(410) 865–8500  
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

23–2725311  
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

21090–2205  
(Zip Code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Common Stock, $0.01 par value  
Title of Each Class 

The NASDAQ Stock Market  
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. 
YES [X]  NO [  ]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. 
YES [  ]  NO [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such 
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  YES [X]  NO [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every 
Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.4-5 of this chapter) during the 
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  YES [X]  NO [  ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be 
contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of 
this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. 

[  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition 
of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):  
Large accelerated filer [X]  Accelerated filer [  ]  Non-accelerated filer [  ]  Smaller reporting company [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) 
YES [  ]  NO [X]

The aggregate market value of the Registrant’s Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was $1.4 billion based on the 
closing price of the Common Stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on May 2, 2010.

The number of shares of Registrant’s Common Stock outstanding as of December 15, 2010 was 94,146,715.

Documents Incorporated by Reference 

Part III of the Form 10-K incorporates by reference certain portions of the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement for its 2011 Annual 
Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Commission not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this report.

Ciena Corporation 10-K

5

 
 
 
6

Ciena Corporation 10-K

Table oF ConTenTs

PaRT I 

Item 1.  Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

Item 1A.  Risk Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36

Item 2.  Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36

Item 3.  Legal Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37

Item 4.  Removed and Reserved . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38

PaRT II 

Item 5. 

 Market for Registrant’s Common Stock, Related Stockholder Matters  
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39

Item 6.  Selected Consolidated Financial Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40

Item 7. 

 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and  
Results of Operations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42

Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70

Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71

Item 9. 

 Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and  
Financial Disclosure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .111

Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .111

Item 9B.  Other Information  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .113

PaRT III 

Item 10.  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .114

Item 11.  Executive Compensation  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .114

Item 12. 

 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management  
and Related Stockholder Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .114

Item 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence . . . . . . . .114

Item 14.  Principal Accountant Fees and Services  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .114

PaRT IV 

Item 15.  Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .115

Signatures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .116

Ciena Corporation 10-K

7

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PaRT I
The information in this annual report contains certain forward-looking statements, including statements related to our 

business prospects, the markets for our products and services, and trends in our business that involve risks and uncer-

tainties. Our actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in these forward-looking statements. Factors 

that might cause such a difference include those discussed in “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of 

Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Business” and elsewhere in this annual report.

ITem 1.   busIness

overview

We are a provider of communications networking equipment, software and services that support the transport, switching, 

aggregation and management of voice, video and data traffic. Our Packet-Optical Transport, Packet-Optical Switching 

and Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery products are used, individually or as part of an integrated solution, in networks 

operated by communications service providers, cable operators, governments and enterprises around the globe.

We are a network specialist targeting the transition of disparate, legacy communications networks to converged, next-

generation architectures, optimized to handle increased traffic volumes and deliver more efficiently a broader mix 

of high-bandwidth communications services. Our communications networking products, through their embedded 

software and our network management software suites, enable network operators to efficiently and cost-effectively 

deliver critical enterprise and consumer-oriented communication services. Together with our comprehensive design, 

implementation and support services, our networking solutions offering seeks to enable software-defined, automated 

networks that address the business challenges, communications infrastructure requirements and service delivery needs 

of our customers. Our customers face a challenging and rapidly changing environment that requires their networks be 

robust enough to address increasing capacity needs from a growing set of consumer and business applications, and 

flexible enough to quickly adapt to execute new business strategies and support the delivery of innovative, revenue-

creating services. By improving network productivity and automation, reducing network costs and providing flexibility 

to enable differentiated service offerings, our networking solutions offering creates business and operational value for 

our customers.

Acquisition of Nortel Metro Ethernet Networks Business (the “MEN Acquisition”)

On March 19, 2010, we completed our acquisition of substantially all of the optical networking and Carrier Ethernet 

assets of Nortel’s Metro Ethernet Networks business (the “MEN Business”). The MEN Business that we acquired is a 

leading provider of next-generation, communications network products, with a significant global installed base and a 

strong technology heritage. The MEN Business is a leader in high-capacity 40G and 100G coherent optical transport 

technology that enables network operators to seamlessly upgrade their existing 2.5G and 10G networks, thereby 

enabling a significant increase in network capacity without the need for new fiber deployments or complex reengineer-

ing. The product and technology assets that we acquired include Nortel’s:

•	

long-haul	optical	transport	portfolio;

•	 metro	optical	Ethernet	switching	and	transport	solutions;

•	 Ethernet	transport,	aggregation	and	switching	technology;

•	 multiservice	SONET/SDH	product	families;	and

•	 network	management	software	products.

In addition to these products, we also acquired the network implementation and support service resources related to 

the MEN Business.

We believe that our acquisition of the MEN Business represents a transformative opportunity for Ciena. We believe that 

this transaction strengthens our position as a leader in next-generation, converged optical Ethernet networking and 

accelerates the execution of our corporate and research and development strategies. We believe that the additional 

8

Ciena Corporation 10-K

geographic reach, expanded customer relationships, and broader portfolio of complementary network solutions 

derived from the MEN Business allow us to better compete with traditional, larger communications network equipment 

vendors. We also believe that our broadened product and services portfolio positions us to address a wider range of 

customer segments, applications and service delivery opportunities. As a result of the MEN Acquisition, we added 

approximately 2,000 employees, including significant additional engineering talent, which nearly doubled our head-

count. We expect our increased scale will enable additional operating leverage and optimize our research and develop-

ment investment toward next-generation technologies and product platforms.

See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements found under Item 8 of Part II of this annual report for addi-

tional information relating to the purchase price of the MEN Business, and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis 

of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7 of Part II of this annual report, for additional information 

describing the effect of this transaction on our business, results of operations and financial position.

Segment Data and Certain Financial Information

Effective upon the completion of the MEN Acquisition, we reorganized our internal organizational structure and the 

management of our business. See Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements found under Item 8 of Part II 

of this annual report. We currently organize our operations into four separate operating segments: “Packet-Optical 

Transport,” “Packet-Optical Switching,” “Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery,” and “Software and Services.” The matters 

discussed in this “Business” section should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements found 

under Item 8 of Part II of this annual report, which include additional financial information about our operating seg-

ments, total assets, revenue, measures of profit and loss, and financial information about geographic areas and custom-

ers representing greater than 10% of revenue.

We generated revenue of $1,236.6 million in fiscal 2010, as compared to $652.6 million in fiscal 2009. Annual revenue 

growth in large part reflects the addition of the MEN Business on March 19, 2010. For more information regarding our 

results of operations, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in 

Item 7 of Part II of this annual report.

Corporate Information and Access to SEC Reports

We were incorporated in Delaware in November 1992, and completed our initial public offering on February 7, 1997. 

Our principal executive offices are located at 1201 Winterson Road, Linthicum, Maryland 21090. Our telephone number 

is (410) 865-8500, and our web site address is www.ciena.com. We make our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly 

reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports, available free of charge on the 

Investor Relations page of our web site as soon as reasonably practicable after we file these reports with the Securities 

and Exchange Commission (SEC). We routinely post the reports above, recent news and announcements, financial 

results and other important information about our business on our website at www.ciena.com. Information contained 

on our web site is not a part of this annual report.

Industry background

The markets in which we sell our communications networking solutions have been subject to dynamic changes in recent 

years, including increased competition, growth in traffic, broader service offerings, and evolving technologies, market 

opportunities and challenges.

Increased Capacity Requirements and Multiservice Traffic Driving Increased Transmission Speeds

Today’s networks are experiencing strong traffic growth and new service demands. Increasing network capacity 

requirements are being driven by growing use of and reliance upon communications services by consumer and enter-

prise end users for a wide range of personal and business tasks, as well as the expansion of high-bandwidth, wireline 

and wireless service offerings.

Business customers seeking to improve automation, efficiency and productivity have become increasingly dependent 

upon enterprise-oriented communications and data services. Enterprises require robust networks to facilitate global 

Ciena Corporation 10-K

9

expansion of operations, enable employee mobility and utilize video services. As their workforces are becoming more 

mobile, enterprises are driving demand for seamless access to critical business applications and data. In addition, 

enterprise technology trends such as IT virtualization and cloud computing are also placing new capacity and service 

requirements on networks. Growth in enterprise-oriented communications applications has resulted in expanded 

carrier-managed offerings of these and other business services. In addition, a number of large enterprises, government 

agencies and research and education institutions have decided to forego these traditional communications service 

offerings in favor of building their own, secure private networks.

At the same time, an increasing portion of network traffic is being driven by consumer-oriented applications. Growing 

consumer adoption of broadband technologies, including peer-to-peer Internet applications, residential video services, 

online gaming and music downloads, as well as expanding mobile video data services, are dramatically increasing net-

work traffic. This multiservice traffic growth requires the transition to higher capacity networks with increased transmis-

sion speeds, often with lower latency, such as our 40G and 100G coherent optical transport technology.

Multiservice Traffic Growth Requiring Transition to Flexible Network Architectures

A broadening mix of high-bandwidth, data and video communications services, together with growing mobility and 

expanding wireless applications, will require upgrades to existing network infrastructure, including mobile backhaul 

and traditional wireline networks. The growing mix of high-bandwidth and latency-sensitive traffic, and an increased 

focus	on	controlling	network	costs,	are	driving	a	transition	from	multiple,	disparate	SONET/SDH-based	networks	to	

more	efficient,	converged,	multi-purpose	Ethernet/IP-based	network	architectures.	The	industry	has	seen	network	

technology transitions like this in the past. These large investment cycles tend to happen over multi-year periods. For 

instance, from the mid 1980s to the mid 1990s, service providers focused network upgrades on the transition required 

to digitize voice traffic. From the mid 1990s to the mid 2000s, service providers focused network upgrades on the 

transition	to	SONET/SDH	networks	designed	to	reliably	handle	substantially	more	network	traffic.	We	believe	that	the	

industry	is	currently	in	the	early	stages	of	network	transition	to	multi-purpose	Ethernet/IP-based	network	architectures	

that more efficiently handle a growing mix of multiservice traffic with a greater concentration of data.

We refer to our implementation of next-generation network architectures that address this transition as “converged 

optical Ethernet.” Our converged optical Ethernet approach brings together the reliability and capacity of optical 

networking with the flexibility and economics of Ethernet, unified by our embedded and network management soft-

ware. These attributes enable a network that is resilient, reconfigurable and automated. These network attributes are 

essential to support next-generation services and applications at the performance level required by end users. We 

see opportunities in providing a portfolio of carrier-class solutions that facilitate this transition to converged optical 

Ethernet networks.

Value Transition from Networks to Applications

In the past, enterprises and consumers perceived value in network connectivity. End users of networks now place a 

higher value on the services or applications accessed and delivered over the network. As a result, in order to compete, 

service providers need to create, market, and sell profitable services as opposed to simply selling connectivity. Some of 

the areas that service providers are pursuing to compete and drive end user value include.

• 

IT VIrTualIzaTIon. IT Virtualization moves a physical resource from a user’s desktop into the network, thereby 

making more efficient use of information technology resources. This approach has many appealing attributes 

such as lowering barriers of entry into new markets, and adding flexibility to scale certain aspects of a business 

faster and with less expense.

•  “Cloud” SerVICeS. Cloud services are characterized by the sharing of computing, storage and network 

resources to improve economics through higher utilization efficiencies. IT and network service providers are 

centralizing these resources in order to offer usage-based and metered services that are hosted remotely across 

a network. Smaller enterprises and consumers can subscribe to cloud services to replace local, on-site facilities, 

while larger enterprises and data center operators may use private clouds to consolidate their own resources and 

public clouds to accommodate peak demand situations, often in combination.

10

Ciena Corporation 10-K

•  MobIlITy. The emergence of smart mobile devices that deliver integrated voice, audio, photo, video, email and 

mobile web capabilities, like Apple’s iPhone™ and Android™-based smart phones, are rapidly changing the 

service type and magnitude of data traffic carried by wireless networks. The increase in availability and improved 

ease of use of web-based applications from mobile devices expands the reach of virtualized services beyond a 

wireline connection. For instance, consumer-driven video and gaming are being virtualized, allowing broad access 

to these applications, regardless of the device or the network used.

We believe these shifts, and end user expectations regarding quality of service for these applications, will require com-

munications network infrastructures to be more automated, robust and flexible.

Market Conditions and Effect on Network Investment

As a result of the sustained period of economic weakness and uncertainty surrounding global macroeconomic condi-

tions, our industry has experienced cautious capital expenditures, particularly among large service provider customers, 

as they have sought to conserve capital or address uncertainties or changes in their own business models brought on 

by broader market challenges. These dynamics have placed increased scrutiny and more rigid prioritization on network 

spending. Our customers seek to create and rapidly deliver new, robust service offerings and dedicated communica-

tions at increasing speeds to differentiate from competitors and grow their business. At the same time, they are increas-

ingly seeking ways to optimize their network operating and capital costs. We believe that these dynamics will result in 

a shift in network spending toward high-capacity, next-generation network architectures. By utilizing scalable networks 

that are less complex, less expensive to operate and more adaptable, network operators can derive increased value 

from their network investments through the rapid, efficient and profitable delivery of new services.

strategy

Key components of our corporate strategy are set forth below:

MaInTaIn and exTend TeChnology leaderShIp In ConVerged opTICal eTherneT neTworkIng To 

drIVe SaleS aCroSS produCT porTfolIo. Through continued investment and innovation, our strategy is to 

enhance our leading, next generation coherent transport technology for high capacity long-haul and metro networks. 

We intend to extend our technology leadership and leverage our market share in Packet-Optical Transport products to 

drive sales of our Packet-Optical Switching and Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery products. We intend to expand our 

data-optimized, Packet-Optical Switching solutions, specifically our ActivFlex 5400 family of Reconfigurable Switching 

Systems, to enable an end-to-end OTN and Ethernet-based architecture that offers better cost per bit, more flexibility, 

and higher reliability for network operators. We also seek to expand our Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery portfolio, 

including high-capacity (terabit scale) Ethernet metro aggregation switches, for mobile backhaul and business Ethernet 

services. An important component of our research and development strategy is to enhance our embedded and net-

work management software. By creating a common network management software platform across our expanded 

product portfolio, we seek to enable service level management across network layers, rapid service provisioning, 

increased automation and leverage across our customer solutions.

dIVerSIfy our CuSToMer SegMenTS and CuSToMer applICaTIon of our produCTS. Historically, service 

providers have represented the largest portion of our revenue, with their application of our products largely support-

ing terrestrial, wireline networks. Part of our strategy is to seek opportunities to address new customer segments, 

and increase our sales to wireless providers, cable and multiservice operators, enterprises, government agencies and 

research and educational institutions. We are also seeking to sell our product and service solutions to support addi-

tional network applications, including in submarine networks, content delivery networks, business Ethernet services and 

mobile backhaul. While we seek to penetrate new customer segments and broaden the applications for which custom-

ers select our solutions, we also intend to win new service provider customers in existing markets and expand our mar-

ket share in existing accounts by cross-selling our broader portfolio.

expand our geographIC reaCh. We seek to build upon the broader global presence of our business provided by 

the MEN Acquisition through expansion of our geographic reach and market share in growing markets including Brazil, 

Ciena Corporation 10-K

11

the Middle East, Russia and India. We intend to penetrate new geographies through a combination of direct resources 

and third party channels, such as reseller, service providers and integrators, for marketing, selling and distributing 

our solutions. We also intend, through cross-selling and other sales initiatives, to increase sales of our Packet-Optical 

Switching and Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery products in international markets. We also seek to build the Ciena 

brand globally through additional marketing initiatives.

leVerage our ConSulTaTIVe, neTwork SpeCIalIST approaCh. Our close relationship with customers in the 

design, development, implementation and support of our solutions offering is a key differentiator for our business and 

provides us with unique insight into their business and network needs. We believe that by offering an expanded portfo-

lio of professional services that meets the business needs of our customers, we bring strategic value to customer rela-

tionships beyond the sale of our next-generation communications networking products. This service-oriented solutions 

offering allows us to work closely with customers in their design, deployment and delivery of new services. By under-

standing and addressing their network infrastructure needs, the competitive landscape, and the evolving and chal-

lenging markets in which our customers compete, we believe our customized solutions offering, including advanced 

services, creates additional business and operational value for our customers, enabling them to better compete in a 

challenging environment.

SuCCeSSfully CoMpleTe The InTegraTIon of The Men buSIneSS and aChIeVe deSIred operaTIng 

leVerage. We continue to make significant progress on activities relating to the integration of the MEN Business. We 

have completed our organizational structure, sales coverage plans and decisions regarding the rationalization of our 

combined product portfolio. We have also realized initial operating synergies from the combined company and are 

approaching an exit from the transition services currently provided by an affiliate of Nortel. We intend to devote the 

necessary time and resources toward the successful completion of remaining integration activities. A number of these 

are complex, including the rationalization of our supply chain, third party manufacturers and facilities, the complete 

integration of our networking equipment offering, the development of a common network management system across 

our expanded portfolio, and the winding down of transition services. We seek to leverage the longer-term opportuni-

ties, including improved operating efficiencies, presented by these activities.

Customers and markets

Our customer base, and the geographic markets and customer segments into which we sell our products and services, 

have expanded in recent years, in part as a result of the acquisition of the MEN Business. The network infrastructure 

needs of our customers vary, depending upon their size, location, the nature of their end users and the applications or 

services that they deliver and support. We sell our product and service offerings through our direct sales force and third 

party channel partners to end user network operators in the following customer segments:

Communications Service Providers

Our service provider customers include regional, national and international, wireline and wireless carriers. These cus-

tomers include AT&T, Bell Canada, BT, Cable & Wireless, CenturyLink, Clearwire, France Telecom, Korea Telecom, 

Qwest, Sprint, Tata Communications, Telefonica, Telmex, Telus, Verizon and XO Communications. Traditional telecom-

munications service providers are our historical customer base and continue to represent the largest contribution to 

our revenue. We provide service providers with products, from the network core to its edge, that address growing 

bandwidth demand from voice, video and data service applications. Our products enable a flexible, high-capacity, con-

verged network that enables service providers to increase revenue through new service offerings and to reduce capital 

and operating network costs by aggregating multiservice traffic. Our products also enable service providers to support 

key applications for enterprise users, including carrier-managed services, wide area network consolidation, inter-site 

connectivity, storage extension, business continuity and Ethernet services.

Cable Operators

Our customers include leading cable and multiservice operators in the U.S. and internationally. These customers 

include Comcast, Cox, RCN, Rogers, Time Warner and Cogeco. Our cable and multiservice operator customers rely 

12

Ciena Corporation 10-K

upon us for carrier-grade, optical Ethernet transport and switching products to support enterprise-oriented services. 

Our platforms allow cable operators to integrate voice, video and data applications over a converged infrastructure and 

scale their networking infrastructure to keep ahead of the bandwidth and application demands of their subscribers. 

Our products support key cable applications including broadcast and digital video, voice over IP, video on demand and 

broadband data services.

Enterprise

Our enterprise customers include large, multi-site commercial organizations, including participants in the financial, 

healthcare, transportation, utilities and retail industries. Our solutions enable enterprises to achieve operational 

improvements, increased automation and information technology cost reductions. Our products enable inter-site con-

nectivity between data centers, sales offices, manufacturing plants, retail stores and research and development centers, 

using an owned or leased private fiber network or a carrier-managed service. Our products facilitate key enterprise 

applications including data, voice and video transport, Ethernet business services, storage extension, business continu-

ity, online collaboration, video conferencing, cloud computing, low latency networking and wide area network (WAN) 

encryption. Our products also enable our enterprise customers to prevent unexpected network downtime and ensure 

the safety, security and availability of their data.

Government, Research and Education

Our government customers include federal and state agencies in the U.S. as well as government entities outside of the 

U.S. Our customers also include domestic and international research and education institutions seeking to take advan-

tage of technology innovation, improve their information infrastructure, and facilitate increased collaboration. Our 

solutions feature ultra-high capacity, reconfigurability and service flexibility to meet the requirements of supercomput-

ing systems. Our products, software and services enable these customers to improve network performance, capacity, 

security, reliability and flexibility. We collaborate with leading institutions to provide government and research and edu-

cation communities with optimized networks that minimize cost and complexity, through initiatives that support intel-

ligent control plane technologies, interoperability and scalability.

Products and services

We offer a portfolio of communications networking products that form the building blocks of resilient and automated, 

next-generation networks. Our product portfolio consists of our Packet-Optical Transport, Packet-Optical Switching 

and Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery products, as well as the embedded and network management software that sup-

ports these platforms.

We have focused our product and service offerings to address the following network priorities: core and metro network 

modernization, managed services and enterprise applications, Carrier Ethernet-based mobile backhaul and high-

capacity submarine networks. In the network’s core, we deliver high-capacity transport and switching products that 

create an automated, dynamic optical infrastructure supporting a wide variety of network services. In the metro portion 

of the network, we deliver a comprehensive, converged transport and switching solution that manages circuits, wave-

lengths and packets. In managed services applications and enterprise networks, we enable enterprise-oriented services 

including storage, data connectivity, video and business Ethernet services. In mobile backhaul applications, we provide 

wireline and wireless carriers with the tools to migrate their networks to support mobile data applications and enable 

Ethernet-based backhaul. In submarine networks, we enhance existing submarine network fiber assets, increasing 

bandwidth capacity and enabling higher-availability services and differentiated customer-focused offerings.

Packet-Optical Transport

Our Packet-Optical Transport portfolio includes industry leading, high-capacity transport platforms such as our ActivFlex 

6500 Packet-Optical Platform, which features coherent, 40G and 100G optical transport. Our Packet-Optical Transport 

platforms include flexible, scalable wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) solutions that enable cost-effective and 

efficient transport of voice, video and data related to a variety of services for core networks as well as regional and metro 

networks. We offer scalable Packet-Optical Transport platforms, including several chassis sizes and a comprehensive set 

Ciena Corporation 10-K

13

of	line	cards,	that	can	be	utilized	from	the	customer	premises,	where	space	and	power	are	critical,	to	the	metropolitan/

regional core, where the need for high capacity and carrier-class performance are essential. By automating optical infra-

structures, our Packet-Optical Transport products support the efficient delivery of a wide variety of consumer-oriented 

network services, as well as key managed service and enterprise applications.

Our Packet-Optical Transport family of products focuses on high-capacity optical transport and includes reconfigurable 

optical add-drop multiplexer (ROADM) capability. In addition to our CN 4200® FlexSelect®Advanced Services Platform 

(now “ActivSpan 4200”) and our Corestream® Agility Optical Transport System, our Packet-Optical Transport portfolio 

includes the following products acquired from the MEN Business:

•	 Optical	Multiservice	Edge	6500	(now	“ActivFlex	6500	Packet	Optical	Platform”)

•	 Optical	Multiservice	Edge	6110	(now	“ActivFlex	6110	Multiservice	Optical	Platform”)

•	 Optical	Metro	5200	(now	“ActivSpan	5200”)

•	 Common	Photonic	Layer	(now	“ActivSpan	CPL”)

•	 Optical	Multiservice	Edge	1000	series	(OME	1000)

•	 Optical	Metro	3500	(OM	3500)

Our	Packet-Optical	Transport	solutions	also	include	legacy	SONET/SDH	products	and	legacy	data	networking	prod-

ucts, as well as certain enterprise-oriented transport solutions that support storage and LAN extension, interconnec-

tion of data centers, and virtual private networks.

Packet-Optical Switching

Our Packet-Optical Switching family of products provides TDM switching and packet switching capability. Our princi-

pal Packet-Optical Switching product is our CoreDirector® Multiservice Optical Switch. CoreDirector is a multiservice, 

multi-protocol	switching	system	that	consolidates	the	functionality	of	an	add/drop	multiplexer,	digital	cross-connect	

and packet aggregator, into a single, high-capacity intelligent switching system. CoreDirector’s mesh capability enables 

more efficient and more reliable networks. In addition to its application in core networks, CoreDirector may also be 

used	in	metro	networks	for	aggregation	and	forwarding	of	multiple	services,	including	Ethernet/TDM	Private	Line,	

Triple Play and IP services. We are in the early stages of a technology transition within our Packet-Optical Switching 

platform, from our CoreDirector platform toward our ActivFlex 5400 family of Reconfigurable Switching Systems. These 

multi-terabit OTN and packet switching systems with integrated transport functionality can be flexibly configured to 

implement a broad range of network elements, including a scalable optical cross-connect, feature-rich Carrier Ethernet 

switch, or a fully converged packet-optical transport and switching system. These new platforms provide the capabili-

ties and reliability of CoreDirector, while providing service providers the ability to scale to higher capacities and transi-

tion to packet-based networks.

Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery

Our Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery products have applications from the edge of metro and core networks to the 

customer premises. These products allow customers to utilize the automation and capacity created by our Packet-

Optical Transport products in core and metro networks and deliver new, revenue-generating services to consumers and 

enterprises. Our Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery offering primarily consists of our ActivEdge service delivery switching 

products, ActivEdge service aggregation platforms and legacy broadband access products for residential services.

Our ActivEdge service delivery and aggregation switches provide True Carrier Ethernet, a more reliable and feature 

rich type of Ethernet that can support a wider variety of services. These products support the access and aggregation 

tiers of communications networks, and are typically deployed in metro and access networks. Service delivery products 

are often used at customer premises locations while aggregation platforms are used to combine services to improve 

network resource utilization. Employing sophisticated carrier Ethernet switching technology, these products deliver 

quality of service capabilities, virtual local area networking and switching functions, and carrier-grade operations, 

administration, and maintenance features. In 2010, we introduced several additions to our service delivery and aggre-

gation offering intended to increase capacity for higher bandwidth user connections and a broader set of aggregation 

14

Ciena Corporation 10-K

and switching capabilities, such as enterprise locations, backhaul from wireless cell sites, multi-tenant unit buildings 

and outside plant cabinets. Initial deployment of these products have principally been in support of wireless backhaul 

deployments, including, in large part, 4G WiMax, and business data services.

Our principal product for consumer broadband is our CNX-5 Broadband DSL System. This broadband access platform allows 

service providers to transition legacy voice networks to support next-generation services such as Internet-based (IP) tele-

phony, video services and DSL, and enable cost-effective migration to higher bandwidth Ethernet network infrastructures.

Unified Software and Service Management Tools

Our Packet-Optical Transport, Packet-Optical Switching and Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery products include a 

shared suite of embedded operating system software and network management software tools that serve to unify 

our product portfolio and provide the underlying automation and management features. Our embedded software is 

a robust, service aware framework that improves network utilization and availability, while delivering enhanced per-

formance monitoring and reliability. By increasing network automation, minimizing network downtime and monitoring 

network performance and service metrics, our embedded software and network management software tools enable 

customers to improve cost effectiveness, while increasing the performance and functionality of their network opera-

tions. To consolidate our software offerings, we have introduced the Ciena One software suite. This suite will be the 

framework for harmonizing the embedded software and the network management software from the pre-acquisition 

Ciena portfolio and the MEN portfolio.

ON-Center® Network & Service Management Suite, our pre-acquisition Ciena integrated network and service manage-

ment software, is designed to simplify network management and operation across our portfolio. ON-Center can track 

individual services across multiple product suites, facilitating planned network maintenance, outage detection and 

identification of customers or services affected by network troubles. The MEN Acquisition added network and service 

management products, such as OMEA and Preside, which are specific to the products of the MEN Business and are 

included in our combined product portfolio.

Consulting and Support Services

To complement our product portfolio, we offer a broad range of consulting and support services that help our custom-

ers design, deploy and operationalize their communications services. We provide these services through our internal 

resources as well as through qualified, third party service partners. Our services and support portfolio includes the fol-

lowing offerings:

•	 Network	analysis,	planning	and	design;

•	 Network	optimization	and	tuning;

•	 Project	management,	including	staging,	site	preparation	and	installation	activities;

•	 Deployment	services,	including	turnkey	installation	and	turn-up	and	test	services;	and

•	 Maintenance	and	support	services,	including:

•	 helpdesk,	technical	assistance	and	training,

•	

spares	and	logistics	management,

•	 engineering	dispatch	and	on-site	professional	services,

•	 equipment	repair	and	replacement,	and

•	

software	maintenance	and	updates.

We believe that our broad service set of service offerings is an important component of our network specialist 

approach and a significant differentiator with customers. We believe that our services offering enables a solutions-

oriented approach to network challenges that builds value in a customer relationship that extends beyond our product 

and software offering. We believe that customers will continue to place significant value on these types of strategic 

engagements and assess vendors on their capability to partner with them effectively in these areas.

Ciena Corporation 10-K

15

Product Development

Our industry is subject to rapid technological developments, evolving standards and protocols, and shifts in customer 

demand. To remain competitive, we must continually enhance existing product platforms by adding new features 

and functionality and introducing new product platforms that address multiservice traffic growth, enable new service 

offerings and facilitate the transition to converged optical Ethernet networking. Within our global products group, we 

maintain a team of skilled engineers with extensive experience in the areas of photonics, packet and circuit switching, 

network system design, embedded operating system and network management software. Through our acquisition of 

the MEN Business, we attained leading 40G and 100G transport technologies and added significant engineering talent 

and considerable investment scale to our research and development activities. Our current development investments 

are focused upon:

•	 Extending	our	Packet-Optical	Transport	leadership	in	40G	and	100G	long	haul	transport	through	development	of	

our	coherent	transmission	technology;

•	 Enhancing	our	data-optimized,	Packet-Optical	Switching	solutions	and	the	evolution	from	our	CoreDirector	family	

to	our	ActivFlex	5400	family	of	Reconfigurable	Switching	Solutions;

•	 Expanding	our	Carrier	Ethernet	Service	Delivery	portfolio,	including	high-capacity	Ethernet	metro	aggregation	

switches	for	mobile	backhaul	and	business	Ethernet	services;	and

•	

Interoperability	and	creating	a	common	network	management	software	platform	across	our	expanded	product	

portfolio and enabling service level management across network layers.

Product development initiatives also include significant design and development work intended to enable cost reduc-

tions relating to the manufacture of our products.

Our product development investments are driven by market demand and technological innovation, involving close col-

laboration among our product development, marketing and global field organizations, and input from customers. In 

some cases, we work with third parties pursuant to technology licenses, OEM arrangements and other strategic tech-

nology relationships or investments, to develop new components or products, modify existing platforms or offer com-

plementary technology to our customers. In addition, we participate in industry and standards organizations, where 

appropriate, and incorporate information from these affiliations throughout the product development process.

We regularly review our existing product offerings and prospective development projects to determine their fit within 

our portfolio and broader corporate strategy. We assess the market demand, technology evolution, prospective return 

on investment and growth opportunities, as well as the costs and resources necessary to develop and support these 

products. In recent years, our strategy has been to pursue technology and product convergence that allows us to con-

solidate multiple technologies and functionalities on a single platform, or to control and manage multiple elements 

throughout the network from a uniform management system, ultimately creating more robust and cost-effective network 

tools. We have also shifted our strategic development approach from delivering point products to comprehensive net-

working equipment, software and service solutions that address the current and future business needs of our customers.

Our research and development expense was $175.0 million, $190.3 million and $327.6 million, for fiscal 2008, 2009 and 

2010, respectively. The increased expense in 2010 was driven primarily by the MEN Acquisition, including the related 

additions to our product portfolio, expanded development initiatives and increased engineering headcount and over-

head. For more information regarding our research and development expense, see “Management’s Discussion and 

Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7 of Part II of this report.

sales and marketing

We sell our communications networking products and services through our direct sales resources as well as through 

channel relationships. In addition to securing new customers, our sales strategy has focused on building long-term rela-

tionships with existing customers that allow us to leverage our incumbency by extending existing platforms and cross-

selling additional products that help customers address multiservice traffic growth and facilitate new service offerings.

16

Ciena Corporation 10-K

Within our global field operations team, we maintain a direct sales presence that is organized geographically around the 

following	markets:	(i)	U.S.	and	Canada;	(ii)	Caribbean	and	Latin	America;	(iii)	Europe,	Middle	East	and	Africa;	and	(iv)	Asia-

Pacific. These regions include sales personnel that focus on one or more of the following customer segments: communi-

cations service providers including wireless providers, cable and multiservice operators, enterprise customers and gov-

ernment,	research	and	education.	Within	each	geographic	area,	we	maintain	regional,	country	and/or	customer-specific	

teams, including account salespersons, systems engineers and strategic marketing, services and commercial manage-

ment personnel, who ensure we operate closely with and provide a high level of support to our customers.

We also maintain a global channel program that works with resellers, systems integrators, service providers, and other 

third party distributors to market and sell our products and services. Our third party channel sales and other distri-

bution arrangements enable us to leverage our direct sales resources and reach additional geographic regions and 

customer segments. These relationships also enable us to sell our products as a complement to a broader offering of 

other vendors or integrators, or in support of a service provider’s carrier managed service offering. Our use of channel 

partners has been a key component in our sales to government, research and education and enterprise customers. We 

believe our channel strategy affords us expanded market opportunities and reduces the financial risk of entering new 

markets and pursuing new customer segments.

To support our sales efforts, we engage in marketing activities intended to position and promote both our brand and 

our product, software and service offerings. Our marketing team supports sales efforts through direct customer inter-

action, industry events, public relations, social media, general business publications, tradeshows, our website and other 

marketing channels for our customers and channel partners.

manufacturing, operations and supply Chain management

Our operations personnel manage our relationships with our third party manufacturers and manage our supply chain. 

In addition, this team also addresses component procurement and sourcing, product testing and quality, and logistics 

relating to our sales, maintenance and professional services, and distribution efforts.

We utilize a global sourcing strategy that emphasizes procurement of materials in lower cost regions. We rely upon third 

party manufacturers, with facilities in Canada, China, Mexico, Thailand and the United States, to perform nearly all of 

the manufacturing of our products. This activity can include design and prototype development, full production, final 

assembly, testing and shipment. We utilize a direct order fulfillment model for certain products, which allows us to rely 

on our third party manufacturers to perform final system integration and testing prior to shipment of products directly 

from their facilities to our customers. For certain product lines, we continue to perform a portion of the module assem-

bly, final system integration and testing internally. We believe that our sourcing and manufacturing strategy allows us to 

conserve capital, lower costs of product sales, adjust quickly to changes in market demand, and operate without dedi-

cating significant resources to manufacturing-related plant and equipment. The integration of manufacturing, opera-

tions and supply chain activities resulting from our acquisition of the MEN Business, while complex and potentially dis-

ruptive, presents longer-term opportunities to further reduce the cost to manufacture our products, including through 

higher purchasing volumes and consolidation of manufacturers, suppliers, warehousing and distribution centers and 

service logistics partners.

Our manufacturers procure components necessary for assembly and manufacture of our products based on our speci-

fications, approved vendor lists, bill of materials and testing and quality standards. Our manufacturers’ activity is based 

on rolling forecasts that we provide to them to estimate demand for our products. This build-to-forecast purchase 

model exposes us to the risk that our customers will not order those products for which we have forecast sales, or will 

purchase less than we have forecast. As a result, we may incur carrying charges or obsolete material charges for compo-

nents purchased by our manufacturers. We work closely with our manufacturers to manage material, quality, cost and 

delivery times, and we continually evaluate their services to ensure performance on a reliable and cost-effective basis.

Shortages in product components have occurred in the past and remain possible. Our products include some com-

ponents that are proprietary in nature and only available from one or a small number of suppliers. In addition, some of 

Ciena Corporation 10-K

17

our application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) are manufactured by sole or limited sources that are responsible for 

production. Significant time would be required to establish relationships with alternate suppliers or providers of critical 

components. We do not have long-term contracts with any supplier or manufacturer that guarantees supply of compo-

nents or manufacturing services. If component supplies become limited, production at a manufacturer is disrupted, or if 

we experience difficulty in our relationship with a key supplier or manufacturer, we may encounter manufacturing delays 

that could adversely affect our business.

backlog

Generally, we make sales pursuant to purchase orders issued under framework agreements that govern the general 

commercial terms and conditions of the sale of our products and services. These agreements do not obligate custom-

ers to purchase any minimum or guaranteed order quantities. At any given time, we have orders for products that have 

not been shipped and for services that have not yet been performed. We also have accepted orders relating to prod-

ucts that have been delivered and services that have been performed that are awaiting customer acceptance under the 

applicable purchase terms. We consider both of these situations in our calculation of backlog. Generally, our customers 

may cancel or change their orders with limited advance notice, or they may decide not to accept these products and 

services. As a result, backlog should not be viewed as an accurate indicator of future revenue in any particular period. In 

particular, the completion of the MEN Acquisition during fiscal 2010 makes the period to period comparisons below less 

meaningful. As of October 31, 2009 and 2010, our backlog was approximately $291.0 million and $591.0 million, respec-

tively. Backlog includes product and service orders from commercial and government customers combined. Backlog at 

October 31, 2010 includes approximately $56.0 million primarily related to orders for maintenance and support services 

that we do not reasonably expect to be filled within the next fiscal year. Our presentation of backlog may not be com-

parable with figures presented by other companies in our industry.

seasonality

Like other companies in our industry, we have experienced quarterly fluctuations in customer activity due to seasonal 

considerations. As a result, we have experienced reductions in customer order volume for product sales toward the end 

of calendar year and again early in the calendar year as annual capital budgets of some of our customers are finalized. 

Conversely, we may experience increased services order flow late in the calendar year as maintenance service terms are 

renewed. We have also experienced reductions in order volume, particularly in Europe, during the late summer months. 

As a result of these seasonal effects, we have experienced reduced order activity during our fiscal first quarter, which 

ends on January 31 of each year, and our fiscal third quarter, which ends on July 31 of each year. These seasonal effects 

do not apply consistently and do not always correlate to our financial results. Accordingly, they should not be consid-

ered a reliable indicator of our future revenue or results of operations.

Competition

Competition among communications networking solution vendors is intense. In addition to the effect of broader 

market conditions, the level of competition we experience has intensified, in part, due to our increased market share, 

technology leadership and global presence resulting from the MEN Acquisition. Competition has also intensified as we 

and our competitors more aggressively seek to secure market share, particularly in connection with new network build 

opportunities, and displace incumbent vendors at large carrier customers.

The markets for our products and services are characterized by rapidly advancing and converging technologies. 

Competition in these markets is based on any one or a combination of the following factors:

•	 product	functionality,	speed,	capacity	and	performance;

•	 price;

•	

incumbency	and	existing	business	relationships;

•	 product	development	plans	and	the	ability	of	products	and	services	to	meet	customers’	immediate	and	future	

network	requirements;

•	 capacity,	flexibility,	speed	and	scalability	of	products;

18

Ciena Corporation 10-K

•	 manufacturing	and	lead-time	capability;	and

•	

installation,	services	and	support	capability.

Competition for sales of communications networking solutions is dominated by a small number of very large, multi-

national companies. Our competitors have included Alcatel-Lucent, Cisco, Ericsson, Fujitsu, Huawei, Nokia Siemens 

Networks and Tellabs. Many of these competitors have substantially greater financial, operational and marketing 

resources than Ciena and have significantly broader product offerings. Many of our competitors also have more exten-

sive customer bases and well-established relationships with large service providers. In recent years, mergers among 

some of our larger competitors have intensified these advantages. Our industry has also experienced increased compe-

tition from larger, low-cost producers in China, who are attempting to penetrate U.S. markets.

We also compete with several smaller, but established, companies that offer one or more products that compete 

directly or indirectly with our offerings or whose products address specific niches within the markets and customer 

segments we address. These competitors include ADVA and Infinera. In addition, there are a variety of earlier-stage 

companies with products targeted at specific segments of the communications networking market. These competitors 

often employ aggressive competitive and business tactics as they seek to gain entry to certain customers or markets. 

Due to these practices and the narrower focus of their development efforts, these competitors may be able to develop 

and introduce products more quickly, or offer commercial terms that are more attractive to customers.

Increased competition could result in pricing pressure, reduced demand, lower gross margins, and loss of market share 

that could harm our business and results of operations.

Patents, Trademarks and other Intellectual Property Rights

The success of our business and technology leadership are significantly dependent upon our proprietary and inter-

nally developed technology. We rely upon patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secret laws to establish and 

maintain proprietary rights in our technology. We regularly file applications for patents and trademarks and have a 

significant number of patents and trademarks in the United States and other countries where we do business. As of 

December 1, 2010, we had received 1,244 U.S. patents and had pending 305 U.S. patent applications. We also have 

over 400 non-U.S. patents.

We also rely on non-disclosure agreements and other contracts and policies regarding confidentiality, with employees, 

contractors and customers to establish proprietary rights and protect trade secrets and confidential information. Our 

practice is to require employees and consultants to execute non-disclosure and proprietary rights agreements upon 

commencement of employment or consulting arrangements with us. These agreements acknowledge our ownership 

of intellectual property developed by the individual during the course of his or her work with us. The agreements also 

require that these persons maintain the confidentiality of all proprietary information disclosed to them.

Enforcing proprietary rights, especially patents, can be costly and uncertain. Moreover, monitoring unauthorized use of 

our technology is difficult, and we cannot be certain that the steps that we are taking will detect or prevent unauthor-

ized use. In recent years, we have filed suit to enforce our intellectual property rights and have been subject to several 

claims related to patent infringement. Third party infringement assertions could cause us to incur substantial costs. 

If we are not successful in defending these claims, we could be required to enter into a license agreement requiring 

ongoing royalty payments, we may be required to redesign our products, or we may be prohibited from selling any 

infringing technology.

Our operating system, element and network management software and other products incorporate software and 

components under licenses from third parties. We may be required to license additional technology from third parties 

in order to develop new products or product enhancements. Failure to obtain or maintain such licenses or other rights 

could affect our development efforts, require us to re-engineer our products or obtain alternate technologies, which 

could harm our business, financial condition and operating results.

Ciena Corporation 10-K

19

Among the patent and other third party intellectual property licenses to which we are a party, in connection with the 

MEN Acquisition, we obtained a non-exclusive license to use patents and other intellectual property controlled or 

exclusively owned by Nortel in connection with our manufacture, sale and support of a broad range of optical network-

ing and Carrier Ethernet products and services and natural evolutions of such products and services. This license also 

provides us with an exclusive license to use a narrower set of patents and other intellectual property owned by Nortel 

in connection with Ciena’s manufacture, sale and support of optical networking and Carrier Ethernet products and 

services within a narrower field of use and subject to certain limitations. As part of this license, we granted Nortel a non-

exclusive license to use the patents and other intellectual property (except trademarks) that we acquired as part of the 

MEN Business in connection with the manufacture and sale of products and services in the fields of Nortel’s other busi-

nesses (including those businesses sold and to be sold to other parties) and natural evolutions of such fields.

environmental matters

Our business and operations are subject to environmental laws in various jurisdictions around the world, including 

the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) and Restriction of the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in 

Electrical and Electronic Equipment (RoHS) regulations adopted by the European Union. We seek to operate our busi-

ness in compliance with such laws relating to the materials and content of our products and product takeback and recy-

cling. Environmental regulation is increasing, particularly outside of the United States, and we expect that our domestic 

and international operations may be subject to additional environmental compliance requirements, which could expose 

us to additional costs. To date, our compliance costs relating to environmental regulations have not resulted in a mate-

rial cost or effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

employees

As of October 31, 2010, we had 4,201 employees. We have not experienced any work stoppages and we consider the 

relationships with our employees to be good. Competition to attract and retain highly skilled technical, engineering 

and other personnel with experience in our industry is intense. We believe that our future success depends in critical 

part on our continued ability to recruit, motivate and retain such qualified personnel. None of our employees is bound 

by an employment agreement.

Directors and executive officers

The table below sets forth certain information concerning our directors and executive officers:

Name 

Patrick H. Nettles, Ph.D.  

Gary B. Smith  

Stephen B. Alexander 

Michael G. Aquino 

James A. Frodsham 

Philippe Morin 

James E. Moylan, Jr. 

Andrew C. Petrik 

David M. Rothenstein 

Stephen P. Bradley, Ph.D.(2)(3) 

Harvey B. Cash(1)(3) 

Bruce L. Claflin(1)(2) 

Lawton W. Fitt(2) 

Judith M. O’Brien(1)(3) 

Michael J. Rowny(2) 

Patrick T. Gallagher(2) 

age 

PositioN

67 

50 

51 

54 

44 

45 

59 

47 

42 

69 

72 

59 

57 

60 

60 

55 

Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Senior Vice President, Chief Technology Officer

Senior Vice President, Global Field Operations

Senior Vice President, Chief Strategy Officer

Senior Vice President, Global Products Group

Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer

Vice President and Controller

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Director

Director

Director

Director

Director

Director

Director

(1)  Member of the Compensation Committee
(2)  Member of the Audit Committee
(3)  Member of the Governance and Nominations Committee

20

Ciena Corporation 10-K

Our	Directors	hold	staggered	terms	of	office,	expiring	as	follows:	Ms.	O’Brien	and	Messrs.	Cash	and	Smith	in	2011;	

Messrs.	Bradley,	Claflin	and	Gallagher	in	2012;	and	Ms.	Fitt,	Dr.	Nettles	and	Mr.	Rowny	in	2013.

paTrICk h. neTTleS, ph.d. has served as a Director of Ciena since April 1994 and as Executive Chairman of the 

Board of Directors since May 2001. From October 2000 to May 2001, Dr. Nettles was Chairman of the Board and Chief 

Executive Officer of Ciena, and he was President and Chief Executive Officer from April 1994 to October 2000. Dr. 

Nettles serves as a Trustee for the California Institute of Technology and serves on the board of directors of Axcelis 

Technologies, Inc. and The Progressive Corporation. Dr. Nettles also serves on the board of directors of Optiwind Corp, 

a privately held company.

gary b. SMITh joined Ciena in 1997 and has served as President and Chief Executive Officer since May 2001. Mr. Smith 

has served on Ciena’s Board of Directors since October 2000. Prior to his current role, his positions with Ciena included 

Chief Operating Officer, and Senior Vice President, Worldwide Sales. Mr. Smith previously served as Vice President of 

Sales and Marketing for INTELSAT and Cray Communications, Inc. Mr. Smith also serves on the board of directors for 

CommVault Systems, Inc. Mr. Smith is a member of the President’s National Security Telecommunications Advisory 

Committee, the Global Information Infrastructure Commission and the Center for Corporate Innovation (CCI).

STephen b. alexander joined Ciena in 1994 and has served as Chief Technology Officer since September 1998 and 

as a Senior Vice President since January 2000. Mr. Alexander has previously served as General Manager of Products & 

Technology and General Manager of Transport and Switching and Data Networking.

MIChael g. aquIno joined Ciena in June 2002 and has served as Ciena’s Senior Vice President, Global Field 

Operations since October 2008. Mr. Aquino served as Senior Vice President of Worldwide Sales from April 2006 to 

October 2008. Mr. Aquino previously held positions as Ciena’s Vice President of Americas, with responsibility for sales 

activities in the region, and Vice President of Government Solutions, where he focused on supporting Ciena’s relation-

ships with the U.S. and Canadian government.

JaMeS frodShaM joined Ciena in May 2004 and has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer 

since March 2010 with responsibility for our strategic planning and corporate development activities. In August 2010, 

Mr. Frodsham also assumed responsibility for our ongoing integration of the MEN Business. Mr. Frodsham previously 

served as Senior Vice President, General Manager of Ciena’s former Broadband Access Group from October 2004 

to October 2005 and Metro and Enterprise Solutions Group from May 2004 to October 2004. From August 2000 to 

January 2003, Mr. Frodsham served as chief operating officer of Innovance Networks, an optical networking company. 

On December 23, 2003, Innovance filed a Notice of Intent to make a proposal pursuant to Part III of the Bankruptcy and 

Insolvency Act (Canada). Prior to that, Mr. Frodsham was employed for more than ten years in senior level positions 

with Nortel Networks in product development and marketing strategy, lastly as Vice President, Product Line Marketing, 

Optical Networking Group, from December 1998 to June 2000. Mr. Frodsham serves on the board of directors of 

Innovance Networks.

phIlIppe MorIn joined Ciena in March 2010 in connection with Ciena’s acquisition of Nortel’s MEN Business and 

has served as Senior Vice President, Global Products Group since that time. In this capacity, Mr. Morin oversees our 

engineering,	supply	chain,	product	line	management,	quality/customer	advocacy,	product	marketing	and	solutions	

organizations on a global basis. Mr. Morin previously served as President of Nortel’s MEN Business from May 2006 until 

Ciena’s completion of the MEN Acquisition in March 2010. In January 2009, Nortel Networks Corporation and certain 

of its subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions in the United States under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. From 

January 2003 to May 2006, Mr. Morin held the position of Nortel’s General Manager of Optical Networks. Mr. Morin 

previously held other positions at Nortel in manufacturing, marketing, sales and product management both in North 

America and Europe.

JaMeS e. Moylan, Jr. has served as Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer since December 2007. 

From June 2006 to December 2007, Mr. Moylan served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Swett 

& Crawford, a wholesale insurance broker. From March 2004 to February 2006, Mr. Moylan served as Executive Vice 

Ciena Corporation 10-K

21

President and Chief Financial Officer of PRG-Shultz International, Inc., a publicly held recovery audit and business ser-

vices firm. From June 2002 to April 2003, Mr. Moylan served as Executive Vice President in charge of Composite Panels 

Distribution and Administration for Georgia-Pacific Corporation’s building products business. From November 1999 to 

May 2002, Mr. Moylan served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of SCI Systems, Inc., an electronics 

contract manufacturing company.

andrew C. peTrIk joined Ciena in 1996 and has served as Vice President, Controller since August 1997 and served as 

Treasurer from August 1997 to October 2008.

daVId M. roThenSTeIn joined Ciena in January 2001 and has served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and 

Secretary since November 2008. Mr. Rothenstein served as Vice President and Associate General Counsel from July 

2004 to October 2008 and previously as Assistant General Counsel.

STephen p. bradley, ph.d. has served as a Director of Ciena since April 1998. Professor Bradley is the Baker Foundation 

Professor and William Ziegler Professor of Business Administration Emeritus at the Harvard Business School. A member 

of the Harvard faculty since 1968, Professor Bradley is also Chairman of Harvard’s Executive Program in Competition 

and Strategy: Building and Sustaining Competitive Advantage. Professor Bradley serves on the board of directors of 

Transatlantic Reinsurance Holdings and the Risk Management Foundation of the Harvard Medical Institutions.

harVey b. CaSh has served as a Director of Ciena since April 1994. Mr. Cash is a general partner of InterWest 

Partners, a venture capital firm in Menlo Park, California, which he joined in 1985. Mr. Cash serves on the board of direc-

tors of First Acceptance Corp., Silicon Laboratories, Inc. and Argonaut Group, Inc.

bruCe l. ClaflIn has served as a Director of Ciena since August 2006. Mr. Claflin served as President and Chief 

Executive Officer of 3Com Corporation from January 2001 until his retirement in February 2006. Mr. Claflin joined 3Com 

as President and Chief Operating Officer in August 1998. Prior to 3Com, Mr. Claflin served as Senior Vice President and 

General Manager, Sales and Marketing, for Digital Equipment Corporation. Mr. Claflin also worked for 22 years at IBM, 

where he held various sales, marketing and management positions, including general manager of IBM PC Company’s 

worldwide research and development, product and brand management, as well as president of IBM PC Company 

Americas. Mr. Claflin also serves on the board of directors of Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) where he is currently 

Chairman of the Board.

lawTon w. fITT has served as a Director of Ciena since November 2000. From October 2002 to March 2005, Ms. Fitt 

served as Director of the Royal Academy of Arts in London. From 1979 to October 2002, Ms. Fitt was an investment 

banker with Goldman Sachs & Co., where she was a partner from 1994 to October 2002, and a managing director from 

1996 to October 2002. In addition to her service as a director of non-profit organizations, Ms. Fitt serves on the board of 

directors of Thomson Reuters and The Progressive Corporation,

JudITh M. o’brIen has served as a Director of Ciena since July 2000. Since November 2006, Ms. O’Brien has served 

as Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Obopay, Inc., a provider of mobile payment services. From 

February 2001 until October 2006, Ms. O’Brien served as a Managing Director at Incubic Venture Fund, a venture capi-

tal firm. Ms. O’Brien was a lawyer with Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, where, from February 1984 to February 2001, 

she was a partner specializing in corporate finance, mergers and acquisitions and general corporate matters.

MIChael J. rowny has served as a Director of Ciena since August 2004. Mr. Rowny has been Chairman of Rowny 

Capital, a private equity firm, since 1999. From 1994 to 1999, and previously from 1983 to 1986, Mr. Rowny was with  

MCI Communications in positions including President and Chief Executive Officer of MCI’s International Ventures, 

Alliances and Correspondent group, acting Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President of Finance, and Treasurer.  

Mr. Rowny’s career in business and government has also included positions as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of 

the Ransohoff Company, Chief Executive Officer of Hermitage Holding Company, Executive Vice President and Chief 

Financial Officer of ICF Kaiser International, Inc., Vice President of the Bendix Corporation, and Deputy Staff Director of 

the White House. Mr. Rowny also serves on the board of directors of Neustar, Inc.

22

Ciena Corporation 10-K

paTrICk T. gallagher has served as a Director of Ciena since May 2009. Mr. Gallagher currently serves as Chairman 

of Ubiquisys Ltd., a leading developer and supplier of femtocells for the global 3G mobile wireless market. From 

January 2008 until February 2009, Mr. Gallagher was Chairman of Macro 4 plc, a global software solutions company, and 

from May 2006 until March 2008, served as Vice Chairman of Golden Telecom Inc., a leading facilities-based provider of 

integrated communications in Russia and the CIS. From 2003 until 2006, Mr. Gallagher was Executive Vice Chairman and 

served as Chief Executive Officer of FLAG Telecom Group and, prior to that role, held various senior management posi-

tions at British Telecom. Mr. Gallagher also serves on the board of directors of Harmonic Inc. and Sollers JSC.

ITem 1a.  RIsK FaCToRs

Risks relating to our acquisition of the men business

During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, we completed our acquisition of the MEN Business. Business combinations of 

the scale and complexity of this transaction involve a high degree of risk. You should consider the following risk factors 

before investing in our securities.

We may fail to realize the anticipated benefits and operating synergies expected from the MEN Acquisition, 

which could adversely affect our operating results and the market price of our common stock.

The success of the MEN Acquisition will depend, in significant part, on our ability to successfully integrate the acquired 

business, grow the combined business’s revenue and realize the anticipated strategic benefits and operating synergies 

from the combination. We believe that the addition of the MEN Business will accelerate the execution of our corporate 

and product development strategy, enable us to compete with larger equipment providers and provide opportunities 

to optimize our product development investment. Achieving these goals requires growth of the revenue of the MEN 

Business and realization of the targeted sales synergies from our combined customer bases and solutions offerings. 

This growth and the anticipated benefits of the transaction may not be realized fully or at all, or may take longer to real-

ize than we expect. Actual operating, technological, strategic and sales synergies, if achieved at all, may be less signifi-

cant than we expect or may take longer to achieve than anticipated. If we are not able to achieve these objectives and 

realize the anticipated benefits and operating synergies of the MEN Acquisition within a reasonable time, our results of 

operations and the value of Ciena’s common stock may be adversely affected.

The MEN Acquisition will result in significant integration costs and any material delays or unanticipated addi-

tional expense may harm our business and results of operations.

The complexity and magnitude of the integration effort associated with the MEN Acquisition are significant and require 

that Ciena fund significant capital and operating expense to support the integration of the combined operations. As 

of October 31, 2010, we have incurred $101.4 million in transaction, consulting and third party service fees, $8.5 million 

in severance expense, and an additional $12.4 million, primarily related to purchases of capitalized information technol-

ogy equipment. We anticipate that we may incur approximately $58.0 million in additional integration costs during fiscal 

2011. We have incurred and expect to continue to incur additional operating expense as we build up internal resources, 

including headcount, facilities and information systems, or engage third party providers, while we simultaneously con-

tinue to rely upon and transition away from critical transition support services provided by an affiliate of Nortel during 

a transition period. In addition to these transition costs, we have incurred and expect to continue to incur increased 

expense relating to, among other things, restructuring and increased amortization of intangibles and inventory obso-

lescence charges. Any material delays, difficulties or unanticipated additional expense associated with integration 

activities may harm our business and results of operations.

The integration of the MEN Business is a complex undertaking, involving a number of operational risks, and dis-

ruptions or delays could significantly harm our business and results of operations.

Because of the structure of the MEN Acquisition as an asset carve out from Nortel, in a number of areas we did not 

acquire back-office systems and processes that support the operation of the business. The MEN Acquisition therefore 

Ciena Corporation 10-K

23

requires that we build new organizations, grow Ciena’s existing infrastructure, or retain third party services to ensure 

business continuity and to support and scale our business. As noted below, we are currently relying upon an affiliate 

of Nortel to provide critical business support services for a transition period and will ultimately have to transfer these 

activities to internal or other third party resources. As a result, integrating the operations of the MEN Business will be 

extremely complex and we could encounter material disruptions, delays or unanticipated costs. Successful integration 

involves numerous risks, including:

•	 assimilating	product	offerings	and	sales	and	marketing	operations;

•	 coordinating	and	implementing	a	combined	research	and	development	strategy;

•	

retaining	and	attracting	customers	following	a	period	of	significant	uncertainty	associated	with	the	acquired	

business;

•	 diversion	of	management	attention	from	business	and	operational	matters;

•	

identifying	and	retaining	key	personnel;

•	 maintaining	and	transitioning	relationships	with	key	vendors,	including	component	providers,	manufacturers	and	

service	providers;

•	

integrating	accounting,	information	technology,	enterprise	management	and	administrative	systems	which	may	

be	difficult	or	costly;

•	 making	significant	cash	expenditures	that	may	be	required	to	retain	personnel	or	eliminate	unnecessary	resources;

•	 managing	tax	costs	or	liabilities	for	acquired	or	acquiring	corporate	entities;

•	 coordinating	a	broader	and	more	geographically	dispersed	organization;

•	 maintaining	uniform	standards,	procedures	and	policies	to	ensure	efficient	and	compliant	administration	of	the	

organization;	and

•	 making	any	necessary	modifications	to	internal	control	to	comply	with	the	Sarbanes-Oxley	Act	of	2002	and	

related rules and regulations.

Disruptions or delays associated with these and other risks encountered in the integration process could have a mate-

rial adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

We are relying on an affiliate of Nortel for the performance of certain critical business support services during a 

transition period following the closing of the MEN Acquisition and there can be no assurance that such services 

will be performed timely and effectively.

We currently rely upon an affiliate of Nortel for certain key business support services related to the operation and con-

tinuity of the MEN Business. These services will be transferred to and taken over by our organization over time as we 

build up the capability and to do so. These services include key finance and accounting functions, supply chain and 

logistics management, maintenance and product support services, order management and fulfillment, trade compli-

ance, and information technology services. Ciena’s administration and oversight of these transition services is complex, 

requires significant resources and presents issues related to the segregation of duties and information among the pur-

chasers. These transition services are costly and we could incur approximately $94.0 million per year, if all of the transi-

tion services are used for a full year. Relying upon the transition services provider to perform critical operations and ser-

vices raises a number of significant business and operational risks. The transition service provider also performs services 

on behalf of other purchasers of the businesses that Nortel has recently divested. There is no assurance the provider 

will serve as an effective support partner for all of the Nortel purchasers and we face risks associated with the provider’s 

ability to retain experienced and knowledgeable personnel, particularly as Ciena and other purchasers wind down sup-

port services. Ciena expects to exit critical transition services during the second quarter of fiscal 2011. The wind down 

and transfer to Ciena or other third parties of these critical services is a complex undertaking and may be disruptive to 

our business and operations. Significant disruption in business support services, the transfer of these activities to Ciena 

or unanticipated costs related to such services could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

24

Ciena Corporation 10-K

The MEN Acquisition may expose us to significant unanticipated liabilities that could adversely affect our busi-

ness and results of operations.

Our purchase of the MEN Business may expose us to significant unanticipated liabilities relating to the operation of 

the Nortel business. These liabilities could include employment, retirement or severance-related obligations under 

applicable law or other benefits arrangements, legal claims, warranty or similar liabilities to customers, and claims by 

or amounts owed to vendors, including as a result of any contracts assigned to Ciena. We may also incur liabilities or 

claims associated with our acquisition or licensing of Nortel’s technology and intellectual property including claims of 

infringement. Particularly in international jurisdictions, our acquisition of the MEN Business, or our decision to indepen-

dently enter new international markets where Nortel previously conducted business, could also expose us to tax liabili-

ties and other amounts owed by Nortel. The incurrence of such unforeseen or unanticipated liabilities, should they be 

significant, could have a material adverse affect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The MEN Acquisition may cause dilution to our earnings per share, which may harm the market price of our com-

mon stock.

A number of factors, including lower than anticipated revenue and gross margin of the MEN Business, or fewer oper-

ating synergies of the combined operations, could cause dilution to our earnings per share or decrease or delay any 

accretive effect of the MEN Acquisition. We could also encounter unanticipated or additional integration-related costs 

or fail to realize all of the benefits of the MEN Acquisition that underlie our financial model and expectations for future 

growth and profitability. These and other factors could cause dilution to our earnings per share or decrease or delay the 

expected financial benefits of the MEN Acquisition and cause a decrease in the price of our common stock.

The complexity of the integration and transition associated with the MEN Acquisition, together with Ciena’s 

increased scale and global presence, may affect our internal control over financial reporting and our ability to 

effectively and timely report our financial results.

We currently rely upon a combination of Ciena information systems and critical transition services provided by an affili-

ate of Nortel to accurately and effectively compile and report our financial results. The additional scale of our opera-

tions, together with the complexity of the integration effort, including changes to or implementation of critical infor-

mation technology systems and reliance upon third party transition services, may adversely affect our ability to report 

our financial results on a timely basis. In addition, we have had to train new employees and third party providers, and 

assume operations in jurisdictions where we have not previously had operations. We expect that the MEN Acquisition 

may necessitate significant modifications to our internal control systems, processes and information systems, both on 

a transition basis, and over the longer-term as we fully integrate the combined company. Due to the complexity of the 

MEN Acquisition, we cannot be certain that changes to our internal control over financial reporting during fiscal 2011 

will be effective for any period, or on an ongoing basis. If we are unable to accurately and timely report our financial 

results, or are unable to assert that our internal controls over financial reporting are effective, our business and market 

perception of our financial condition may be harmed and the trading price of our stock may be adversely affected.

Risks related to our business and operations

Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk. In addition to the other information contained in this report, 

you should consider the following risk factors before investing in our securities.

Our business and operating results could be adversely affected by unfavorable macroeconomic and market condi-

tions and reductions in the level of capital expenditure by our largest customers in response to these conditions.

Broad macroeconomic weakness has previously resulted in sustained periods of decreased demand for our products 

and services that have adversely affected our operating results. In response to these conditions, many of our custom-

ers significantly reduced their network infrastructure expenditures as they sought to conserve capital, reduce debt or 

address uncertainties or changes in their own business models brought on by broader market challenges. We continue 

to experience cautious spending among our customers as a result of the recent period of economic weakness and 

Ciena Corporation 10-K

25

remain uncertain as to how long these macroeconomic and industry conditions will continue, the pace of recovery, 

and the magnitude of the effect of these market conditions on our business and results of operations. Continued or 

increased challenging economic and market conditions could result in:

•	 difficulty	forecasting,	budgeting	and	planning	due	to	limited	visibility	into	the	spending	plans	of	current	or	pro-

spective	customers;

•	

•	

increased	competition	for	fewer	network	projects	and	sales	opportunities;

increased	pricing	pressure	that	may	adversely	affect	revenue	and	gross	margin;

•	 higher	overhead	costs	as	a	percentage	of	revenue;

•	

increased	risk	of	charges	relating	to	excess	and	obsolete	inventories	and	the	write	off	of	other	intangible	assets;	and

•	 customer	financial	difficulty	and	increased	difficulty	in	collecting	accounts	receivable.

Our business and operating results could be materially affected by periods of unfavorable macroeconomic and market 

conditions, globally or specific to a particular region where we operate, and any resulting reductions in the level of capi-

tal expenditure by our customers.

A small number of communications service providers account for a significant portion of our revenue. The loss of 

any of these customers, or a significant reduction in their spending, would have a material adverse effect on our 

business and results of operations.

A significant portion of our revenue is concentrated among a relatively small number of communications service provid-

ers. One customer, AT&T, accounted for greater than 10% of revenue representing approximately 21.6% of fiscal 2010 

revenue. Consequently, our financial results are closely correlated with the spending of a relatively small number of 

service providers and are significantly affected by market or industry changes that affect their businesses. The terms of 

our frame contracts generally do not obligate these customers to purchase any minimum or specific amounts of equip-

ment or services. Because their spending may be unpredictable and sporadic, our revenue and operating results can 

fluctuate on a quarterly basis. Reliance upon a relatively small number of customers increases our exposure to changes 

in their network and purchasing strategies. Some of our customers are pursuing efforts to outsource the management 

and operation of their networks, or have indicated a procurement strategy to reduce or rationalize the number of ven-

dors from which they purchase equipment. These strategies may present challenges to our business and could benefit 

our larger competitors. Our concentration in revenue has increased in recent years, in part, as a result of consolidations 

among a number of our largest customers. Consolidations may increase the likelihood of temporary or indefinite reduc-

tions in customer spending or changes in network strategy that could harm our business and operating results. The loss 

of one or more large service provider customers, or a significant reduction in their spending, as a result of the factors 

above or otherwise, would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our revenue and operating results can fluctuate unpredictably from quarter to quarter.

Our revenue and results of operations can fluctuate unpredictably from quarter to quarter. Our budgeted expense 

levels depend in part on our expectations of long-term future revenue and gross margin, and substantial reductions 

in expense are difficult and can take time to implement. Uncertainty or lack of visibility into customer spending, and 

changes in economic or market conditions, can make it difficult to prepare reliable estimates of future revenue and 

corresponding expense levels. Consequently, our level of operating expense or inventory may be high relative to our 

revenue, which could harm our ability to achieve or maintain profitability. Given market conditions and the effect of cau-

tious spending in recent quarters, lower levels of backlog orders and an increase in the percentage of quarterly revenue 

relating to orders placed in that quarter could result in more variability and less predictability in our quarterly results.

Additional factors that contribute to fluctuations in our revenue and operating results include:

•	 broader	economic	and	market	conditions	affecting	us	and	our	customers;

•	 changes	in	capital	spending	by	large	communications	service	providers;

•	

the	timing	and	size	of	orders,	including	our	ability	to	recognize	revenue	under	customer	contracts;

26

Ciena Corporation 10-K

•	

the	transition	from	selling	legacy	to	next-generation	technology	platforms;

•	 availability	and	cost	of	critical	components;

•	 variations	in	the	mix	between	higher	and	lower	margin	products	and	services;	and

•	

the	level	of	pricing	pressure	we	encounter,	particularly	for	our	Packet-Optical	Transport.

Many factors affecting our results of operations are beyond our control, particularly in the case of large service provider 

orders and multi-vendor or multi-technology network infrastructure builds where the achievement of certain thresholds 

for acceptance is subject to the readiness and performance of the customer or other providers, and changes in customer 

requirements or installation plans. As a consequence, our results for a particular quarter may be difficult to predict, and 

our prior results are not necessarily indicative of results likely in future periods. The factors above may cause our revenue 

and operating results to fluctuate unpredictably from quarter to quarter. These fluctuations may cause our operating 

results to be below the expectations of securities analysts or investors, which may cause our stock price to decline.

We face intense competition that could hurt our sales and results of operations.

The markets in which we compete for sales of networking equipment, software and services are extremely competitive. 

Competition is particularly intense in attracting large carrier customers and securing new market opportunities with 

existing carrier customers. In an effort to secure new or long-term customers and capture market share, in the past we 

have and in the future we may agree to pricing or other terms that result in negative gross margins on a particular order 

or group of orders. The level of competition and pricing pressure that we face increases substantially during periods of 

macroeconomic weakness, constrained spending or fewer network projects. As a result of these market conditions, we 

have experienced significant competition and increased pricing pressure, particularly for our Packet-Optical Transport 

products, as we and other vendors have sought to retain or grow market share.

Competition in our markets, generally, is based on any one or a combination of the following factors: price, product 

features, functionality and performance, service offering, manufacturing capability and lead-times, incumbency and 

existing business relationships, scalability and the flexibility of products to meet the immediate and future network 

requirements of customers. A small number of very large companies have historically dominated our industry. These 

competitors have substantially greater financial and marketing resources, greater manufacturing capacity, broader 

product offerings and more established relationships with service providers and other potential customers than we do. 

Because of their scale and resources, they may be perceived to be better positioned to offer network operating or man-

agement service for large carrier customers. We expect that the acquired products and technologies, increased market 

share and global presence resulting from the MEN Acquisition will only intensify the level of competition that we face, 

particularly from larger vendors. We also compete with a number of smaller companies that provide significant compe-

tition for a specific product, application, customer segment or geographic market. Due to the narrower focus of their 

efforts, these competitors may achieve commercial availability of their products more quickly or may be more attractive 

to customers.

Increased competition in our markets has resulted in aggressive business tactics, including:

•	 significant	price	competition,	particularly	for	our	Packet-Optical	Transport	platforms;

•	 customer	financing	assistance;

•	 early	announcements	of	competing	products	and	extensive	marketing	efforts;

•	 competitors	offering	equity	ownership	positions	to	customers;

•	 competitors	offering	to	repurchase	our	equipment	from	existing	customers;

•	 marketing	and	advertising	assistance;	and

•	

intellectual	property	assertions	and	disputes.

The tactics described above can be particularly effective in an increasingly concentrated base of potential customers 

such as communications service providers. If competitive pressures increase or we fail to compete successfully in our 

markets, our sales and profitability would suffer.

Ciena Corporation 10-K

27

Our reliance upon third party manufacturers exposes us to risks that could negatively affect our business  

and operations.

We rely upon third party contract manufacturers to perform the majority of the manufacturing of our products and compo-

nents. We do not have contracts in place with some of our manufacturers, do not have guaranteed supply of components 

or manufacturing capacity and in some cases are utilizing temporary or transitional commercial arrangements intended to 

facilitate the integration of the MEN Business. Our reliance upon third party manufacturers could expose us to increased 

risks related to lead times, continued supply, on-time delivery, quality assurance and compliance with environmental stan-

dards and other regulations. Reliance upon third parties manufacturers exposes us to risks related to their operations, 

financial position, business continuity and continued viability, which may be adversely affected by broader macroeconomic 

conditions and difficulties in the credit markets. In an effort to drive cost reductions, we anticipate rationalizing our supply 

chain and third party contract manufacturers as part of the integration of the MEN Business into Ciena’s operations. There 

can be no assurance that these efforts, including any consolidation or reallocation the third party sourcing and manufactur-

ing, will not ultimately result in additional costs or disruptions in our operations and business.

We may also experience difficulties as a result of geopolitical events, military actions or health pandemics in the coun-

tries where our products or critical components are manufactured. Our product manufacturing principally takes place 

in Mexico, Canada, Thailand and China. Thailand is undergoing a period of instability and we have in the past experi-

enced product shipment delays associated with political turmoil in Thailand, including a blockade of its main interna-

tional airport. Significant disruptions in these countries affecting supply and manufacturing capacity, or other difficul-

ties with our contract manufacturers would negatively affect our business and results of operations.

Investment of research and development resources in technologies for which there is not a matching market 

opportunity, or failure to sufficiently or timely invest in technologies for which there is market demand, would 

adversely affect our revenue and profitability.

The market for communications networking equipment is characterized by rapidly evolving technologies and changes 

in market demand. We continually invest in research and development to sustain or enhance our existing products and 

develop or acquire new products technologies. Our current development efforts are focused upon the platform evolu-

tion of our CoreDirector Multiservice Optical Switch family to our ActivFlex 5400 family of Reconfigurable Switching 

Systems, the expansion of our ActivEdge service delivery and aggregation switches, and our 40G and 100G coherent 

technologies and capabilities for our Packet-Optical Transport platforms. There is often a lengthy period between com-

mencing these development initiatives and bringing a new or improved product to market. During this time, technology 

preferences, customer demand and the market for our products may move in directions we had not anticipated. There 

is no guarantee that new products or enhancements will achieve market acceptance or that the timing of market adop-

tion will be as predicted. There is a significant possibility, therefore, that some of our development decisions, including 

significant expenditures on acquisitions, research and development costs, or investments in technologies, will not turn 

out as anticipated, and that our investment in some projects will be unprofitable. There is also a possibility that we may 

miss a market opportunity because we failed to invest, or invested too late, in a technology, product or enhancement. 

Changes in market demand or investment priorities may also cause us to discontinue existing or planned development 

for new products or features, which can have a disruptive effect on our relationships with customers. These product 

development risks can be compounded in the context of a significant acquisition such as the MEN Business and deci-

sion making regarding our product portfolio and the significant development work required to integrate the combined 

product and software offerings. If we fail to make the right investments or fail to make them at the right time, our com-

petitive position may suffer and our revenue and profitability could be harmed.

Product performance problems could damage our business reputation and negatively affect our results of operations.

The development and production of highly technical and complex communications network equipment is complicated. 

Some of our products can be fully tested only when deployed in communications networks or when carrying traffic 

with other equipment. As a result, product performance problems are often more acute for initial deployments of new 

28

Ciena Corporation 10-K

products and product enhancements. Our products have contained and may contain undetected hardware or software 

errors or defects. These defects have resulted in warranty claims and additional costs to remediate. Unanticipated 

problems can relate to the design, manufacturing, installation or integration of our products. Performance problems 

and product malfunctions can also relate to defects in components, software or manufacturing services supplied by 

third parties. Product performance, reliability and quality problems can negatively affect our business, including:

•	

increased	costs	to	remediate	software	or	hardware	defects	or	replace	products;

•	 payment	of	liquidated	damages	or	similar	claims	for	performance	failures	or	delays;

•	

•	

increased	inventory	obsolescence;

increased	warranty	expense	or	estimates	resulting	from	higher	failure	rates,	additional	field	service	obligations	or	

other	rework	costs	related	to	defects;

•	 delays	in	recognizing	revenue	or	collecting	accounts	receivable;	and

•	 declining	sales	to	existing	customers	and	order	cancellations.

Product performance problems could also damage our business reputation and harm our prospects with potential cus-

tomers. These consequences of product defects or quality problems, including any significant costs to remediate, could 

negatively affect our business and results of operations.

Network equipment sales to large communications service providers often involve lengthy sales cycles and pro-

tracted contract negotiations and may require us to assume terms or conditions that negatively affect our pric-

ing, payment terms and the timing of revenue recognition.

Our future success will depend in large part on our ability to maintain and expand our sales to large communications ser-

vice providers. These sales typically involve lengthy sales cycles, protracted and sometimes difficult contract negotiations, 

and sales to service providers often involve extensive product testing, and demonstration laboratory or network certifica-

tion, including network-specific or region-specific processes. We are sometimes required to agree to contract terms or 

conditions that negatively affect pricing, payment terms and the timing of revenue recognition in order to consummate 

a sale. During periods of macroeconomic or market weakness, these customers may request extended payment terms, 

vendor or third-party financing and other alternative purchase structures. These terms may, in turn, negatively affect our 

revenue and results of operations and increase our risk and susceptibility to quarterly fluctuations in our results. Service 

providers may ultimately insist upon terms and conditions that we deem too onerous or not in our best interest. Moreover, 

our purchase agreements generally do not require that a customer guarantee any minimum purchase level and customers 

often have the right to modify, delay, reduce or cancel previous orders. As a result, we may incur substantial expense and 

devote time and resources to potential relationships that never materialize or result in lower than anticipated sales.

Difficulties with third party component suppliers, including sole and limited source suppliers, could increase our 

costs and harm our business and customer relationships.

We depend on third party suppliers for our product components and subsystems, as well as for equipment used to 

manufacture and test our products. Our products include key optical and electronic components for which reliable, high-

volume supply is often available only from sole or limited sources. Increases in market demand or periods of economic 

weakness have previously resulted in shortages in availability for important components. Unfavorable economic condi-

tions can affect our suppliers’ liquidity level and ability to continue to invest in their business and to stock components 

in sufficient quantity. We have experienced increased lead times and a higher incidence of component discontinuation. 

These difficulties with suppliers could result in lost revenue, additional product costs and deployment delays that could 

harm our business and customer relationships. We do not have any guarantee of supply from these third parties, and in 

many cases relating to the MEN Business, are relying upon temporary or transitional commercial arrangements intended 

to facilitate the integration. As a result, there is no assurance that we will be able to secure the components or subsys-

tems that we require in sufficient quantity and quality on reasonable terms. The loss of a source of supply, or lack of suf-

ficient availability of key components, could require that we locate an alternate source or redesign our products, each of 

which could increase our costs and negatively affect our product gross margin and results of operations. Our business 

Ciena Corporation 10-K

29

and results of operations would be negatively affected if we were to experience any significant disruption of difficulties 

with key suppliers affecting the price, quality, availability or timely delivery of required components.

We may not be successful in selling our products into new markets and developing and managing new  

sales channels.

We expanded our geographic presence significantly as a result of the MEN Acquisition, and we continue to take steps 

to sell our products into new geographic markets outside of our traditional markets and to a broader customer base, 

including other large communications service providers, enterprises, wireless operators, cable operators, submarine 

network operators, content providers, and federal, state and local governments. In many cases, we have less experi-

ence in these markets and customers have less familiarity with our company. To succeed in some of these markets we 

believe we must develop and manage new sales channels and distribution arrangements. We expect these relation-

ships to be an important part of our business internationally as well as for sales to federal, state and local governments. 

Failure to manage additional sales channels effectively would limit our ability to succeed in these new markets and 

could adversely affect our ability to expand our customer base and grow our business.

We may experience delays in the development of our products that may negatively affect our competitive posi-

tion and business.

Our products are based on complex technology, and we can experience unanticipated delays in developing, manufac-

turing or deploying them. Each step in the development life cycle of our products presents serious risks of failure, rework 

or delay, any one of which could affect the cost-effective and timely development of our products. The development of 

our products, including the integration of the products acquired from the MEN Business into our portfolio and the devel-

opment of an integrated software tool to manage the combined portfolio, present significant complexity. In addition, 

intellectual property disputes, failure of critical design elements, and other execution risks may delay or even prevent the 

release of these products. Delays in product development may affect our reputation with customers and the timing and 

level of demand for our products. If we do not develop and successfully introduce products in a timely manner, our com-

petitive position may suffer and our business, financial condition and results of operations would be harmed.

We may be required to write off significant amounts of inventory as a result of our inventory purchase practices, 

the convergence of our product lines or unfavorable macroeconomic or industry conditions.

To avoid delays and meet customer demand for shorter delivery terms, we place orders with our contract manufacturers 

and suppliers to manufacture components and complete assemblies based in part on forecasts of customer demand. As a 

result, our inventory purchases expose us to the risk that our customers either will not order the products we have forecasted 

or will purchase fewer products than forecasted. Unfavorable market or industry conditions can limit visibility into customer 

spending plans and compound the difficulty of forecasting inventory at appropriate levels. Moreover, our customer purchase 

agreements generally do not guarantee any minimum purchase level, and customers often have the right to modify, reduce 

or cancel purchase quantities. As a result, we may purchase inventory in anticipation of sales that do not occur. Historically, 

our inventory write-offs have resulted from the circumstances above. As features and functionalities converge across our 

product lines, and we introduce new products, however, we face an additional risk that customers may forego purchases of 

one product we have inventoried in favor of another product with similar functionality. If we are required to write off or write 

down a significant amount of inventory, our results of operations for the period would be materially adversely affected.

Restructuring activities could disrupt our business and affect our results of operations.

We have previously taken steps, including reductions in force, office closures, and internal reorganizations to reduce 

the size and cost of our operations and to better match our resources with market opportunities. We may take simi-

lar steps in the future, particularly as we seek to realize operating synergies and cost reductions associated with the 

MEN Acquisition. These changes could be disruptive to our business and may result in significant expense including 

accounting charges for inventory and technology-related write-offs, workforce reduction costs and charges relating to 

30

Ciena Corporation 10-K

consolidation of excess facilities. Substantial expense or charges resulting from restructuring activities could adversely 

affect our results of operations in the period in which we take such a charge.

Our failure to manage effectively our relationships with third party service partners could adversely impact our 

financial results and relationship with customers.

We rely on a number of third party service partners, both domestic and international, to complement our global ser-

vice and support resources. We rely upon these partners for certain maintenance and support functions, as well as the 

installation of our equipment in some large network builds. In order to ensure the proper installation and maintenance 

of our products, we must identify, train and certify qualified service partners. Certification can be costly and time-

consuming, and our partners often provide similar services for other companies, including our competitors. We may not 

be able to manage effectively our relationships with our service partners and cannot be certain that they will be able to 

deliver services in the manner or time required. If our service partners are unsuccessful in delivering services:

•	 we	may	suffer	delays	in	recognizing	revenue;

•	 our	services	revenue	and	gross	margin	may	be	adversely	affected;	and

•	 our	relationship	with	customers	could	suffer.

Difficulties with service partners could cause us to transition a larger share of deployment and other services from third 

parties to internal resources, thereby increasing our services overhead costs and negatively affecting our services gross 

margin and results of operations.

Our intellectual property rights may be difficult and costly to enforce.

We generally rely on a combination of patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secret laws to establish and maintain 

proprietary rights in our products and technology. Although we have been issued numerous patents and other patent 

applications are currently pending, there can be no assurance that any of these patents or other proprietary rights will 

not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented or that our rights will provide us with any competitive advantage. In 

addition, there can be no assurance that patents will be issued from pending applications or that claims allowed on any 

patents will be sufficiently broad to protect our technology. Further, the laws of some foreign countries may not protect 

our proprietary rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States.

We are subject to the risk that third parties may attempt to use our intellectual property without authorization. Protecting 

against the unauthorized use of our products, technology and other proprietary rights is difficult, time-consuming and 

expensive, and we cannot be certain that the steps that we are taking will prevent or minimize the risks of such unauthor-

ized use. Litigation may be necessary to enforce or defend our intellectual property rights or to determine the validity 

or scope of the proprietary rights of others. Such litigation could result in substantial cost and diversion of management 

time and resources, and there can be no assurance that we will obtain a successful result. Any inability to protect and 

enforce our intellectual property rights, despite our efforts, could harm our ability to compete effectively.

We may incur significant costs in response to claims by others that we infringe their intellectual property rights.

From time to time third parties may assert claims or initiate litigation or other proceedings related to patent, copyright, 

trademark and other intellectual property rights to technologies and related standards that are relevant to our busi-

ness. These assertions have increased over time due to our growth, the increased number of products and competitors 

in the communications network equipment industry and the corresponding overlaps, and the general increase in the 

rate of patent claims assertions, particularly in the United States. Asserted claims, litigation or other proceedings can 

include claims against us or our manufacturers, suppliers or customers, alleging infringement of third party proprietary 

rights with respect our existing or future products and technology or components of those products. Regardless of the 

merit of these claims, they can be time-consuming, divert the time and attention of our technical and management per-

sonnel, and result in costly litigation. These claims, if successful, can require us to:

•	 pay	substantial	damages	or	royalties;

•	 comply	with	an	injunction	or	other	court	order	that	could	prevent	us	from	offering	certain	of	our	products;

Ciena Corporation 10-K

31

•	 seek	a	license	for	the	use	of	certain	intellectual	property,	which	may	not	be	available	on	commercially	reasonable	

terms	or	at	all;

•	 develop	non-infringing	technology,	which	could	require	significant	effort	and	expense	and	ultimately	may	not	be	

successful;	and

•	

indemnify	our	customers	pursuant	to	contractual	obligations	and	pay	damages	on	their	behalf.

Any of these events could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our exposure to risks associated with the use of intellectual property may be increased as a result of acquisitions, as we 

have a lower level of visibility into the development process with respect to such technology or the steps taken to safe-

guard against the risks of infringing the rights of third parties.

Our international operations could expose us to additional risks and expense and adversely affect our results 

of operations.

We market, sell and service our products globally and rely upon a global supply chain for sourcing of important compo-

nents and manufacturing of our products. International operations are subject to inherent risks, including:

•	 effects	of	changes	in	currency	exchange	rates;

•	 greater	difficulty	in	collecting	accounts	receivable	and	longer	collection	periods;

•	 difficulties	and	costs	of	staffing	and	managing	foreign	operations;

•	

•	

the	impact	of	economic	conditions	in	countries	outside	the	United	States;

less	protection	for	intellectual	property	rights	in	some	countries;

•	 adverse	tax	and	customs	consequences,	particularly	as	related	to	transfer-pricing	issues;

•	 social,	political	and	economic	instability;

•	 higher	incidence	of	corruption;

•	

trade	protection	measures,	export	compliance,	domestic	preference	procurement	requirements,	qualification	to	

transact	business	and	additional	regulatory	requirements;	and

•	 natural	disasters,	epidemics	and	acts	of	war	or	terrorism.

We expect that we may enter new markets and withdraw from or reduce operations in others. In some countries, our 

success will depend in part on our ability to form relationships with local partners. Our inability to identify appropriate 

partners or reach mutually satisfactory arrangements could adversely affect our business and operations. Our global 

operations may result in increased risk and expense to our business and could give rise to unanticipated liabilities or 

difficulties that could adversely affect our operations and financial results.

Our use and reliance upon development resources in India may expose us to unanticipated costs or liabilities.

We have a significant development center in India and, in recent years, have increased headcount and development 

activity at this facility. There is no assurance that our reliance upon development resources in India will enable us to 

achieve meaningful cost reductions or greater resource efficiency. Further, our development efforts and other opera-

tions in India involve significant risks, including:

•	 difficulty	hiring	and	retaining	appropriate	engineering	resources	due	to	intense	competition	for	such	resources	

and	resulting	wage	inflation;

•	 exposure	to	misappropriation	of	intellectual	property	and	proprietary	information;

•	 heightened	exposure	to	changes	in	the	economic,	regulatory,	security	and	political	conditions	of	India;	and

•	 fluctuations	in	currency	exchange	rates	and	tax	compliance	in	India.

Difficulties resulting from the factors above and other risks related to our operations in India could expose us to 

increased expense, impair our development efforts, harm our competitive position and damage our reputation.

32

Ciena Corporation 10-K

We may be exposed to unanticipated risks and additional obligations in connection with our resale of comple-

mentary products or technology of other companies.

We have entered into agreements with strategic partners that permit us to distribute their products or technology. We 

may rely upon these relationships to add complementary products or technologies, diversify our product portfolio, or 

address a particular customer or geographic market. We may enter into additional original equipment manufacturer 

(OEM), resale or similar strategic arrangements in the future, including in support of our selection as a domain sup-

ply partner with AT&T. We may incur unanticipated costs or difficulties relating to our resale of third party products. 

Our third party relationships could expose us to risks associated with the business and viability of such partners, as 

well as delays in their development, manufacturing or delivery of products or technology. We may also be required by 

customers to assume warranty, indemnity, service and other commercial obligations greater than the commitments, if 

any, made to us by our technology partners. Some of our strategic partners are relatively small companies with limited 

financial resources. If they are unable to satisfy their obligations to us or our customers, we may have to expend our own 

resources to satisfy these obligations. Exposure to these risks could harm our reputation with key customers and nega-

tively affect our business and our results of operations.

Our exposure to the credit risks of our customers and resellers may make it difficult to collect receivables and 

could adversely affect our revenue and operating results.

In the course of our sales to customers, we may have difficulty collecting receivables and could be exposed to risks 

associated with uncollectible accounts. We may be exposed to similar risks relating to third party resellers and other 

sales channel partners. Lack of liquidity in the capital markets or a sustained period of unfavorable economic conditions 

may increase our exposure to credit risks. Our attempts to monitor these situations carefully and take appropriate mea-

sures to protect ourselves may not be sufficient, and it is possible that we may have to write down or write off doubt-

ful accounts. Such write-downs or write-offs could negatively affect our operating results for the period in which they 

occur, and, if large, could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and operating results.

If we are unable to attract and retain qualified personnel, we may be unable to manage our business effectively.

Competition to attract and retain highly skilled technical, engineering and other personnel with experience in our indus-

try is intense and our employees have been the subject of targeted hiring by our competitors. We may experience diffi-

culty retaining and motivating existing employees and attracting qualified personnel to fill key positions. Because we rely 

upon equity awards as a significant component of compensation, particularly for our executive team, a lack of positive 

performance in our stock price, reduced grant levels, or changes to our compensation program may adversely affect our 

ability to attract and retain key employees. It may be difficult to replace members of our management team or other key 

personnel, and the loss of such individuals could be disruptive to our business. In addition, none of our executive officers 

is bound by an employment agreement for any specific term. If we are unable to attract and retain qualified personnel, 

we may be unable to manage our business effectively and our operations and results of operations could suffer.

We may be adversely affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates.

As a global concern, we face exposure to adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates. Historically, our sales 

have primarily been denominated in U.S. dollars. As a result of our increased global presence, a larger percentage of 

our revenue is now non-U.S. dollar denominated and therefore subject to foreign currency fluctuation. In addition, we 

face exposure to currency exchange rates as a result of our non-U.S. dollar denominated operating expense in Europe, 

Asia, Latin America and Canada. We have previously hedged against currency exposure associated with anticipated 

foreign currency cash flows and may do so in the future. There can be no assurance that these hedging instruments 

will be effective and losses associated with these instruments and the adverse effect of foreign currency exchange rate 

fluctuation may negatively affect our results of operations.

Our products incorporate software and other technology under license from third parties and our business 

would be adversely affected if this technology was no longer available to us on commercially reasonable terms.

Ciena Corporation 10-K

33

We integrate third-party software and other technology into our embedded operating system, network management 

system tools and other products. Licenses for this technology may not be available or continue to be available to us on 

commercially reasonable terms. Third party licensors may insist on unreasonable financial or other terms in connection 

with our use of such technology. Difficulties with third party technology licensors could result in termination of such 

licenses, which may result in significant costs and require us to obtain or develop a substitute technology. Difficulty 

obtaining and maintaining third-party technology licenses may disrupt development of our products and increase our 

costs, which could harm our business.

Our business is dependent upon the proper functioning of our internal business processes and information sys-

tems and modifications may disrupt our business, processes and internal controls.

The successful operation of various internal business processes and information systems is critical to the efficient oper-

ation of our business. If these systems fail or are interrupted, our operations may be adversely affected and operating 

results could be harmed. Our business processes and information systems need to be sufficiently scalable to support 

the integration of the MEN Business and future growth of our business. The integration of the MEN Business and trans-

fer of business support services being performed under the transition services agreement will require significant modi-

fications relating to our internal business processes and information systems. Significant changes to our processes and 

systems expose us to a number of operational risks. These changes may be costly and disruptive, and could impose 

substantial demands on management time. These changes may also require the modification of a number of internal 

control procedures and significant training of employees. Any material disruption, malfunction or similar problems with 

our business processes or information systems, or the transition to new processes and systems, could have a negative 

effect on the operation of our business and our results of operations.

Strategic acquisitions and investments may expose us to increased costs and unexpected liabilities.

We may acquire or make investments in other technology companies, or enter into other strategic relationships, to 

expand the markets we address, diversify our customer base or acquire or accelerate the development of technology or 

products. To do so, we may use cash, issue equity that would dilute our current stockholders’ ownership, or incur debt 

or assume indebtedness. These transactions involve numerous risks, including:

•	 significant	integration	costs;

•	 disruption	due	to	the	integration	and	rationalization	of	operations,	products,	technologies	and	personnel;

•	 diversion	of	management’s	attention;

•	 difficulty	completing	projects	of	the	acquired	company	and	costs	related	to	in-process	projects;

•	

•	

the	loss	of	key	employees;

ineffective	internal	controls	over	financial	reporting;

•	 dependence	on	unfamiliar	suppliers	or	manufacturers;

•	 exposure	to	unanticipated	liabilities,	including	intellectual	property	infringement	claims;	and

•	 adverse	tax	or	accounting	effects	including	amortization	expense	related	to	intangible	assets	and	charges	associ-

ated with impairment of goodwill.

As a result of these and other risks, our acquisitions, investments or strategic transactions may not reap the intended 

benefits and may ultimately have a negative impact on our business, results of operation and financial condition.

Changes in government regulation affecting the communications industry and the businesses of our customers 

could harm our prospects and operating results.

The Federal Communications Commission, or FCC, has jurisdiction over the U.S. communications industry and similar 

agencies have jurisdiction over the communication industries in other countries. Many of our largest customers are subject 

to the rules and regulations of these agencies. Changes in regulatory requirements in the United States or other countries 

could inhibit service providers from investing in their communications network infrastructures or introducing new services. 

34

Ciena Corporation 10-K

These changes could adversely affect the sale of our products and services. Changes in regulatory tariff requirements 

or other regulations relating to pricing or terms of carriage on communications networks could slow the development or 

expansion of network infrastructures and adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition.

Governmental regulations affecting the use, import or export of products could negatively affect our revenue.

The United States and various foreign governments have imposed controls, license requirements and other restrictions 

on the usage, import or export of some of the technologies that we sell. Governmental regulation of usage, import or 

export of our products, or our failure to obtain required approvals for our products, could harm our international and 

domestic sales and adversely affect our revenue and costs of sales. Failure to comply with such regulations could result 

in enforcement actions, fines or penalties and restrictions on export privileges. In addition, costly tariffs on our equip-

ment, restrictions on importation, trade protection measures and domestic preference requirements of certain coun-

tries could limit our access to these markets and harm our sales. For example, India’s government has recently imple-

mented certain rules applicable to non-Indian network equipment vendors and is considering further restrictions that 

may inhibit sales of certain communications equipment, including equipment manufactured in China, where certain of 

our products are assembled. These and other regulations could adversely affect the sale or use of our products and 

could adversely affect our business and revenue.

Governmental regulations related to the environment and potential climate change, could adversely affect our 

business and operating results.

Our operations are regulated under various federal, state, local and international laws relating to the environment 

and potential climate change. We could incur fines, costs related to damage to property or personal injury, and costs 

related to investigation or remediation activities, if we were to violate or become liable under these laws or regulations. 

Our product design efforts, and the manufacturing of our products, are also subject to evolving requirements relating 

to the presence of certain materials or substances in our equipment, including regulations that make producers for such 

products financially responsible for the collection, treatment and recycling of certain products. For example, our opera-

tions and financial results may be negatively affected by environmental regulations, such as the Waste Electrical and 

Electronic Equipment (WEEE) and Restriction of the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic 

Equipment (RoHS) that have been adopted by the European Union. Compliance with these and similar environmental 

regulations may increase our cost of designing, manufacturing, selling and removing our products. These regulations 

may also make it difficult to obtain supply of compliant components or require us to write off non-compliant inventory, 

which could have an adverse effect our business and operating results.

We may be required to write down long-lived assets and these impairment charges would adversely affect our 

operating results.

As of October 31, 2010, our balance sheet includes $600.4 million in long-lived assets, which includes $426.4 million of 

intangible assets. Valuation of our long-lived assets requires us to make assumptions about future sales prices and sales 

volumes for our products. These assumptions are used to forecast future, undiscounted cash flows. Given the significant 

uncertainty and instability of macroeconomic conditions in recent periods, forecasting future business is difficult and 

subject to modification. If actual market conditions differ or our forecasts change, we may be required to reassess long-

lived assets and could record an impairment charge. Any impairment charge relating to long-lived assets would have 

the effect of decreasing our earnings or increasing our losses in such period. If we are required to take a substantial 

impairment charge, our operating results could be materially adversely affected in such period.

Failure to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting could have a material adverse effect on 

our business, operating results and stock price.

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires that we include in our annual report a report containing man-

agement’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting as of the end of our fiscal 

year and a statement as to whether or not such internal controls are effective. Compliance with these requirements has 

Ciena Corporation 10-K

35

resulted in, and is likely to continue to result in, significant costs and the commitment of time and operational resources. 

Changes in our business, including the MEN Acquisition, will necessitate modifications to our internal control systems, 

processes and information systems. Our increased global operations and expansion into new regions could pose addi-

tional challenges to our internal control systems. We cannot be certain that our current design for internal control over 

financial reporting, or any additional changes to be made during fiscal 2011, will be sufficient to enable management to 

determine that our internal controls are effective for any period, or on an ongoing basis. If we are unable to assert that 

our internal controls over financial reporting are effective, our business may be harmed. Market perception of our finan-

cial condition and the trading price of our stock may be adversely affected, and customer perception of our business 

may suffer.

Outstanding indebtedness under our convertible notes may adversely affect our business.

At October 31, 2010, indebtedness on our outstanding convertible notes totaled approximately $1.4 billion in aggregate 

principal. Our indebtedness could have important negative consequences, including:

•	

•	

•	

•	

increasing	our	vulnerability	to	adverse	economic	and	industry	conditions;

limiting	our	ability	to	obtain	additional	financing,	particularly	in	light	of	unfavorable	conditions	in	the	credit	markets;

reducing	the	availability	of	cash	resources	for	other	purposes,	including	capital	expenditures;

limiting	our	flexibility	in	planning	for,	or	reacting	to,	changes	in	our	business	and	the	markets	in	which	we	com-

pete;	and

•	 placing	us	at	a	possible	competitive	disadvantage	to	competitors	that	have	better	access	to	capital	resources.

We may also add additional indebtedness such as equipment loans, working capital lines of credit and other long-

term debt.

Our stock price is volatile.

Our common stock price has experienced substantial volatility in the past and may remain volatile in the future. 

Volatility in our stock price can arise as a result of a number of the factors discussed in this “Risk Factors” section. 

During fiscal 2010, our closing stock price ranged from a high of $19.24 per share to a low of $10.67 per share. The stock 

market has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected the market price of many technol-

ogy companies, with such volatility often unrelated to the operating performance of these companies. Divergence 

between our actual or anticipated financial results and published expectations of analysts can cause significant swings 

in our stock price. Our stock price can also be affected by announcements that we, our competitors, or our customers 

may make, particularly announcements related to acquisitions or other significant transactions. Our common stock is 

included in a number of market indices and any change in the composition of these indices to exclude our company 

would adversely affect our stock price. On December 18, 2009, we were removed from the S&P 500, a widely-followed 

index. These factors, as well as conditions affecting the general economy or financial markets, may materially adversely 

affect the market price of our common stock in the future.

ITem 1b.  unResolVeD sTaFF CommenTs
Not applicable.

ITem 2.  PRoPeRTIes
oVerVIew. As of October 31, 2010, all of our properties are leased and we do not own any real property. We lease 

eighty-five facilities related to the ongoing operations of our four business segments and related functions. Our princi-

pal executive offices are located in Linthicum, Maryland. We lease six buildings located at various sites near Linthicum, 

Maryland, including an engineering facility, two supply chain and logistics facilities, and three administrative and sales 

facilities. Our largest engineering facility is located at Nortel’s Carling campus in Ottawa, Canada. See below for infor-

mation	regarding	the	lease	associated	with	this	facility.	We	also	have	engineering	and/or	service	facilities	located	in	San	

36

Ciena Corporation 10-K

Jose,	California;	Alpharetta,	Georgia;	Spokane,	Washington;	Kanata,	Canada;	and	Gurgaon,	India.	We	maintain	a	sales	

and service facility in London, England and a supply chain logistics facility in Newtonabbey, Northern Ireland. In addition, 

we lease various smaller offices in the United States, Mexico, South America, Europe and Asia to support our sales and 

services operations. We believe the facilities we are now using are adequate and suitable for our business requirements.

reSTruCTurIng. We lease a number of properties that we no longer occupy. As part of our restructuring costs, we 

provide for the estimated cost of the future net lease expense for these facilities. The cost is based on the fair value of 

future minimum lease payments under contractual obligations offset by the fair value of the estimated future sublease 

payments that we may receive. As of October 31, 2010, our accrued restructuring liability related to these properties 

was $6.4 million. If actual market conditions relating to the use of these facilities are less favorable than those projected 

by management, additional restructuring costs associated with these facilities may be required. For additional informa-

tion regarding our lease obligations, see Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of Part II of this 

annual report.

CarlIng leaSe. Upon the completion of the MEN Acquisition, Ciena Canada Inc., a subsidiary of Ciena, entered into 

a lease agreement with Nortel Networks Technology Corp. (“Landlord”) relating to the “Lab 10” building on Nortel’s 

Carling Campus in Ottawa, Canada (the “Carling lease”). This facility consists of a rentable area of 265,000 square feet 

for which we incur lease expense of approximately $7.2 million CAD per year, consisting of both base rent and fixed 

additional operating expense, the latter of which will increase 2% per year. The Carling lease has a ten-year term, sub-

ject to early termination provisions that may be exercised by Landlord if the property is purchased by a third party who 

requires vacant possession of the premises occupied by us prior to the end of the term. Landlord’s exercise of these 

early termination rights is subject to Landlord’s payment of an early termination fee of up to $33.5 million USD.

On October 19, 2010, Nortel issued a press release announcing its entry into an agreement with Public Works and 

Government Services Canada (PWGSC) for the sale of the Carling Campus. Nortel indicated that it targets a closing for 

this sale transaction at the end of calendar 2010. Nortel’s press release further indicated, with respect to the Carling 

lease, that “Nortel is directed by PWGSC under the sale agreement to exercise, on closing, Nortel’s early termina-

tion rights under the lease, shortening the lease from 10 years to 5 years.” Pursuant to the terms of the Carling lease, 

should Nortel exercise its early termination rights as indicated in its press release, Ciena would be entitled to receive, 

within three business days of Nortel’s delivery of an early termination notice, payment of an early termination fee in the 

amount of $33.5 million USD. Such fee would be paid from the escrowed portion of the purchase price paid by Ciena 

for the MEN Business. See Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of Part II of this annual report for 

additional information relating to the sale of the Carling Campus and Ciena’s receipts of the early termination fee fol-

lowing the completion of fiscal 2010.

ITem 3.  legal PRoCeeDIngs
On May 29, 2008, Graywire, LLC filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia 

against Ciena and four other defendants, alleging, among other things, that certain of the parties’ products infringe 

U.S. Patent 6,542,673 (the “‘673 Patent”), relating to an identifier system and components for optical assemblies. The 

complaint, which seeks injunctive relief and damages, was served upon Ciena on January 20, 2009. Ciena filed an 

answer to the complaint and counterclaims against Graywire on March 26, 2009, and an amended answer and counter-

claims on April 17, 2009. On April 27, 2009, Ciena and certain other defendants filed an application for inter partes reex-

amination of the ‘673 Patent with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (the “PTO”). On the same date, Ciena and the 

other defendants filed a motion to stay the case pending reexamination of all of the patents-in-suit. On July 17, 2009, 

the district court granted the defendants’ motion to stay the case. On July 23, 2009, the PTO granted the defendants’ 

application for reexamination with respect to certain claims of the ‘673 Patent. We believe that we have valid defenses 

to the lawsuit and intend to defend it vigorously in the event the stay of the case is lifted.

As a result of our June 2002 merger with ONI Systems Corp., we became a defendant in a securities class action lawsuit 

filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in August 2001. The complaint named 

Ciena Corporation 10-K

37

ONI, certain former ONI officers, and certain underwriters of ONI’s initial public offering (IPO) as defendants, and 

alleges, among other things, that the underwriter defendants violated the securities laws by failing to disclose alleged 

compensation arrangements (such as undisclosed commissions or stock stabilization practices) in ONI’s registration 

statement and by engaging in manipulative practices to artificially inflate ONI’s stock price after the IPO. The complaint 

also alleges that ONI and the named former officers violated the securities laws by failing to disclose the underwriters’ 

alleged compensation arrangements and manipulative practices. No specific amount of damages has been claimed. 

Similar complaints have been filed against more than 300 other issuers that have had initial public offerings since 1998, 

and all of these actions have been included in a single coordinated proceeding. The former ONI officers have been 

dismissed from the action without prejudice. In July 2004, following mediated settlement negotiations, the plain-

tiffs, the issuer defendants (including Ciena), and their insurers entered into a settlement agreement. The settlement 

agreement did not require Ciena to pay any amount toward the settlement or to make any other payments. While the 

partial settlement was pending approval, the plaintiffs continued to litigate their cases against the underwriter defen-

dants. In October 2004, the district court certified a class with respect to the Section 10(b) claims in six “focus cases” 

selected out of all of the consolidated cases, which cases did not include Ciena, and which decision was appealed 

by the underwriter defendants to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. On February 15, 2005, the district 

court granted the motion for preliminary approval of the settlement agreement, subject to certain modifications, and 

on August 31, 2005, the district court issued a preliminary order approving the revised stipulated settlement agree-

ment. On December 5, 2006, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated the district court’s grant of class 

certification in the six focus cases. On April 6, 2007, the Second Circuit denied plaintiffs’ petition for rehearing. In light 

of the Second Circuit’s decision, the parties agreed that the settlement could not be approved. On June 25, 2007, the 

district court approved a stipulation filed by the plaintiffs and the issuer defendants terminating the proposed settle-

ment. On August 14, 2007, the plaintiffs filed second amended complaints against the defendants in the six focus cases. 

On September 27, 2007, the plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification based on their amended complaints and 

allegations. On March 26, 2008, the district court denied motions to dismiss the second amended complaints filed by 

the defendants in the six focus cases, except as to Section 11 claims raised by those plaintiffs who sold their securities 

for a price in excess of the initial offering price and those who purchased outside the previously certified class period. 

Briefing on the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification in the focus cases was completed in May 2008. That motion was 

withdrawn without prejudice on October 10, 2008. On April 2, 2009, a stipulation and agreement of settlement between 

the plaintiffs, issuer defendants and underwriter defendants was submitted to the Court for preliminary approval. The 

Court granted the plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary approval and preliminarily certified the settlement classes on June 10,  

2009. The settlement fairness hearing was held on September 10, 2009. On October 6, 2009, the Court entered an opin-

ion granting final approval to the settlement and directing that the Clerk of the Court close these actions. Notices of 

appeal of the opinion granting final approval have been filed. Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation and because 

the settlement remains subject to appeal, the ultimate outcome of the matter is uncertain.

In addition to the matters described above, we are subject to various legal proceedings, claims and litigation arising in 

the ordinary course of business. We do not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material 

effect on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

ITem 4.  RemoVeD anD ReseRVeD

38

Ciena Corporation 10-K

PaRT II

ITem 5.   maRKeT FoR RegIsTRanT’s Common sToCK, RelaTeD 

sToCKholDeR maTTeRs anD IssueR PuRChases oF  
equITy seCuRITIes

(a)  Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “CIEN.” The following table 

sets forth the high and low sales prices of our common stock, as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, 

for the fiscal periods indicated.

Fiscal Year 2009

First Quarter ended January 31 

Second Quarter ended April 30 

Third Quarter ended July 31 

Fourth Quarter ended October 31 

Fiscal Year 2010

First Quarter ended January 31 

Second Quarter ended April 30 

Third Quarter ended July 31 

Fourth Quarter ended October 31 

HigH 

$  9.79 

$12.28 

$12.51 

$16.64 

$14.02 

$18.59 

$19.24 

$15.69 

Low

$  5.07

$  4.98

$  8.45

$11.08

$10.67

$12.76

$12.29

$12.02

As of December 15, 2010, there were approximately 952 holders of record of our common stock and 94,146,715 shares 

of common stock outstanding. We have never paid cash dividends on our capital stock. We intend to retain earnings for 

use in our business and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

The following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total returns for an investment in our common stock, the 

NASDAQ Telecommunications Index and the NASDAQ Composite Index from October 31, 2005 to October 31, 2010. 

The NASDAQ Telecommunications Index contains securities of NASDAQ-listed companies classified according to the 

Industry Classification Benchmark as Telecommunications and Telecommunications Equipment. They include providers 

of fixed-line and mobile telephone services, and makers and distributors of high-technology communication products. 

This graph is not deemed to be “filed” with the SEC or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange 

Act of 1934, and the graph shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any prior or subsequent filing by 

us under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act.

S
R
A
L
L
O
D

.

.

S
U

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

OCT 05

APR 06

OCT 06

APR 07

OCT 07

APR 08

OCT 08

APR 09

OCT 09

APR 10

OCT 10

CIENA

NASDAQ TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDEX

NASDAQ COMPOSITE INDEX

Ciena Corporation 10-K

39

 
 
Assumes $100 invested in Ciena Corporation, the NASDAQ Telecommunications Index and the NASDAQ Composite 

Index on October 31, 2005 with all dividends reinvested at month-end.

(b)  Not applicable.

(c)  Not applicable.

ITem 6.  seleCTeD ConsolIDaTeD FInanCIal DaTa
The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with Item 7, “Management’s Discussion 

and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes 

thereto included in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” We have a 52 or 53 week fiscal year, which 

ends on the Saturday nearest to the last day of October in each year. For purposes of financial statement presentation, 

each fiscal year is described as having ended on October 31. Fiscal 2006, 2008, 2009 and 2010 consisted of 52 weeks and 

fiscal 2007 consisted of 53 weeks.

balance sheet Data:

(in ThOusAnDs) 

Cash and cash equivalents 

Short-term investments 

Long-term investments 

Total assets 

2006 

$   220,164 

$   628,393 

$   351,407 

$1,839,713 

Short-term convertible notes payable 

$ 

 — 

Long-term convertible notes payable 

Total liabilities 

Stockholders’ equity 

$   842,262 

$1,086,087 

$   753,626 

Year eNded october 31,

2007 

2008 

$   892,061 

$   822,185 

$ 

 33,946 

$2,416,273 

$   542,262 

$   800,000 

$1,566,119 

$   850,154 

$   550,669 

$   366,336 

$   156,171 

$2,024,594 

$ 

 — 

$   798,000 

$1,025,645 

$   998,949 

2009 

$   485,705 

$   563,183 

$ 

   8,031 

$1,504,383 

$ 

 — 

$   798,000 

$1,048,545 

$   455,838 

2010

$   688,687

$ 

$ 

 —

 —

$2,118,093

$ 

 —

$1,442,705

$1,958,800

$   159,293

40

Ciena Corporation 10-K

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
statement of operations Data:

(in ThOusAnDs, exCepT peR shARe DATA) 

2006 

2007 

2008 

2009 

2010

Year eNded october 31,

$564,056 

$779,769 

$902,448 

$ 652,629 

$1,236,636

Revenue 

Cost of goods sold 

Gross profit 

Operating expenses:

Research and development 

Selling and marketing 

General and administrative 

Acquisition and integration costs 

Amortization of intangible assets 

Restructuring (recoveries) costs 

Goodwill impairment 

Gain on lease settlement 

Change in fair value of  
  contingent consideration 

Total operating expenses 

Income (loss) from operations 

Interest and other income, net 

Interest expense 

Realized loss due to impairment of  
  marketable debt investments 

Loss on cost method investments 

Gain on extinguishment of debt 

Gain on equity investments, net 

Income (loss) before income taxes 

Provision (benefit) for income taxes 

306,275 

257,781 

111,069 

104,434 

44,445 

— 

25,181 

15,671 

— 

(11,648) 

— 

289,152 

(31,371) 

50,245 

(24,165) 

— 

— 

7,052 

215 

1,976 

1,381 

417,500 

362,269 

127,296 

118,015 

50,248 

— 

25,350 

(2,435) 

— 

(4,871) 

— 

451,521 

450,927 

175,023 

152,018 

68,639 

— 

32,264 

1,110 

— 

— 

— 

313,603 

429,054 

48,666 

76,483 

(26,996) 

21,873 

36,762 

(12,927) 

(13,013) 

(5,101) 

— 

— 

592 

85,732 

2,944 

$  82,788 

$ 

  0.97 

— 

932 

— 

41,539 

2,645 

$  38,894 

$ 

  0.44 

367,799 

284,830 

190,319 

134,527 

47,509 

— 

24,826 

11,207 

455,673 

— 

— 

864,061 

(579,231) 

9,487 

(7,406) 

— 

(5,328) 

— 

— 

(582,478) 

(1,324) 

739,135

497,501

327,626

193,515

102,692

101,379

99,401

8,514

—

—

(13,807)

819,320

(321,819)

3,917

(18,619)

—

—

4,948

—

(331,573)

1,941

$(581,154) 

$  (333,514)

$ 

  (6.37) 

$ 

    (3.58)

Net income (loss) 

$ 

   595 

Basic net income (loss) per common share  

$ 

  0.01 

Diluted net income (loss) per potential  
  common share 

Weighted average basic common  
  shares outstanding 

Weighted average dilutive potential  
  common shares outstanding 

$ 

  0.01 

$ 

  0.87 

$ 

  0.42 

$ 

  (6.37) 

$ 

    (3.58)

83,840 

85,525 

89,146 

91,167 

93,103

85,011 

99,604 

110,605 

91,167 

93,103

Ciena Corporation 10-K

41

 
ITem 7.   managemenT’s DIsCussIon anD analysIs oF FInanCIal 

ConDITIon anD ResulTs oF oPeRaTIons

This report contains statements that discuss future events or expectations, projections of results of operations or financial 

condition, changes in the markets for our products and services, or other “forward-looking” information. Our “forward- 

looking” information is based on various factors and was derived using numerous assumptions. in some cases, you can 

identify these “forward-looking statements” by words like “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” 

“believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “intends,” “potential” or “continue” or the negative of those words and other 

comparable words. You should be aware that these statements only reflect our current predictions and beliefs. These 

statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, and actual events or results may 

differ materially. important factors that could cause our actual results to be materially different from the forward-looking 

statements are disclosed throughout this report, particularly under the heading “Risk Factors” in item 1A of part i of this 

annual report. You should review these risk factors for a more complete understanding of the risks associated with an 

investment in our securities. We undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements. The fol-

lowing discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our “selected Consolidated Financial Data” and con-

solidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this annual report.

overview

We are a provider of communications networking equipment, software and services that support the transport, switching, 

aggregation and management of voice, video and data traffic. Our Packet-Optical Transport, Packet-Optical Switching 

and Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery products are used, individually or as part of an integrated solution, in networks oper-

ated by communications service providers, cable operators, governments and enterprises around the globe.

We are a network specialist targeting the transition of disparate, legacy communications networks to converged, next-

generation architectures, optimized to handle increased traffic volumes and deliver more efficiently a broader mix 

of high-bandwidth communications services. Our communications networking products, through their embedded 

software and our network management software suites, enable network operators to efficiently and cost-effectively 

deliver critical enterprise and consumer-oriented communication services. Together with our comprehensive design, 

implementation and support services, our networking solutions offering seeks to enable software-defined, automated 

networks that address the business challenges, communications infrastructure requirements and service delivery needs 

of our customers. Our customers face a challenging and rapidly changing environment that requires their networks be 

robust enough to address increasing capacity needs from a growing set of consumer and business applications, and 

flexible enough to quickly adapt to execute new business strategies and support the delivery of innovative, revenue-

creating services. By improving network productivity and automation, reducing network costs and providing flexibility 

to enable differentiated service offerings, our networking solutions offering creates business and operational value for 

our customers.

Acquisition of Nortel Metro Ethernet Networks Business (the “MEN Acquisition”)

On March 19, 2010, we completed our acquisition of substantially all of the optical networking and Carrier Ethernet 

assets of Nortel’s Metro Ethernet Networks business (the “MEN Business”). In accordance with the agreements for the 

acquisition, the $773.8 million aggregate purchase price was subsequently adjusted downward by $80.6 million based 

upon the amount of net working capital transferred to us at closing. See “Issuance of Convertible Notes during fiscal 

2010” below for information relating to our election to pay the aggregate purchase price in cash. As a result, we paid 

$693.2 million in cash for the purchase of the MEN Business.

In connection with the acquisition, we entered into an agreement with Nortel to lease the “Lab 10” building on 

Nortel’s Carling Campus in Ottawa, Canada (the “Carling lease”) for a term of ten years. The lease agreement con-

tained a provision that allowed Nortel to reduce the term of the lease, and in exchange, we would receive a payment 

of up to $33.5 million. This amount was placed into escrow by Nortel in accordance with the acquisition agreements. 

The fair value of this contingent refund right was determined by Ciena to be $16.4 million and was recorded as a 

reduction to the consideration paid, resulting in a purchase price of $676.8 million. See Item 2 of Part I of this report for 

42

Ciena Corporation 10-K

more information regarding the terms of the Carling lease and Nortel’s recent announcement regarding the exercise 

of its early termination feature under the Carling lease, which resulted in a non-cash, unrealized gain of $13.8 million 

during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010.

Rationale for MEN Acquisition

The MEN Business that we acquired is a leading provider of next-generation, communications network equipment, 

with a significant global installed base and a strong technology heritage. The MEN Business is a leader in high-capacity 

40G and 100G coherent optical transport technology that enables network operators to seamlessly upgrade their exist-

ing 2.5G and 10G networks, thereby enabling a significant increase in network capacity without the need for new fiber 

deployments or complex re-engineering. The product and technology assets that we acquired include Nortel’s:

•	

long-haul	optical	transport	portfolio;

•	 metro	optical	Ethernet	switching	and	transport	solutions;

•	 Ethernet	transport,	aggregation	and	switching	technology;

•	 multiservice	SONET/SDH	product	families;	and

•	 network	management	software	products.

In addition to these hardware and software solutions, we also acquired the network implementation and support ser-

vice resources related to the MEN Business.

We believe that the MEN Acquisition represents a transformative opportunity for Ciena. We believe that this transac-

tion strengthens our position as a leader in next-generation, converged optical Ethernet networking and will accelerate 

the execution of our corporate and research and development strategies set forth in Item 1 “Business” in Part I of this 

annual report. We believe that the additional geographic reach, expanded customer relationships, and broader port-

folio of complementary network solutions derived from the MEN Business allow us to better compete with traditional, 

larger network equipment vendors. As a result of the MEN Acquisition, we added approximately 2,000 employees, 

including significant additional engineering talent, which nearly doubled our headcount. We expect that the resulting 

increased scale to our business will enable additional operating leverage and provide an opportunity to optimize our 

research and development investment toward next-generation technologies and product platforms.

Integration Activities and Costs

We continue to make progress on integration-related activities in connection with the MEN Acquisition. We have com-

pleted our organizational structure, sales coverage plans, and decisions regarding the rationalization of our combined 

product portfolio. As described in “Restructuring Activities” below, we have also realized initial operating synergies 

from the MEN Acquisition. Significant and complex additional integration efforts remain, including the rationalization of 

our supply chain, third party manufacturers and facilities, the execution of our combined product and software devel-

opment plan, and our reduced reliance upon and winding down of transition services currently being provided by an 

affiliate of Nortel.

Given the relative size of the MEN Business and the structure of the MEN Acquisition as an asset carve-out from 

Nortel, the integration of the MEN Business has been costly and complex. As of October 31, 2010, we have incurred 

$101.4 million in transaction, consulting and third party service fees, $8.5 million in severance expense, and an addi-

tional $12.4 million, primarily related to purchases of capitalized information technology equipment. We have also 

incurred inventory obsolescence charges and may incur additional expenses related to, among other things, facilities 

restructuring. We anticipate that we will incur approximately $58.0 million in additional integration costs during fis-

cal 2011. Any material delays or difficulties in integrating the MEN Business or additional, unanticipated expense may 

harm our business and results of operations.

In addition to the integration costs above, we incurred significant transition services expense during fiscal 2010, and 

expect to continue to incur significant expense into the second quarter of fiscal 2011. Transition service costs are 

reflected as a component of operating expense, principally general and administrative expense, and cost of goods 

Ciena Corporation 10-K

43

sold. We are currently relying upon an affiliate of Nortel to perform certain critical operational and business sup-

port functions during an interim integration period that will continue until we can perform these services ourselves 

or locate another provider. These support services include key finance and accounting functions, supply chain and 

logistics management, maintenance and product support services, order management and fulfillment, trade compli-

ance, and information technology services. These services are estimated to cost approximately $94.0 million per year, 

were we to utilize all of the transition services for a full year. The actual transition service expense will depend upon 

the scope of the services that Ciena utilizes and the time within which we are able to complete the planned trans-

fer of these services to internal resources or other providers. We have also incurred and expect to continue to incur 

additional costs as we build up internal resources, including headcount, facilities and information systems, or engage 

alternate third party providers, while we simultaneously rely upon and transition away from these transition support 

services. The wind down and transfer of critical transition services, which we expect to complete in the second quar-

ter of fiscal 2011, is a complex undertaking that presents a number of operational risks that could adversely affect our 

business and results of operations.

Effect of MEN Acquisition upon Results of Operations and Financial Condition

Due to the relative scale of its operations, the MEN Acquisition has materially affected our operations, financial results 

and liquidity. Our revenue and operating expense have increased materially compared to periods prior to the MEN 

Acquisition. As a result of the MEN Acquisition, we recorded $492.4 million in other intangible assets that will be amor-

tized over their useful lives and increase our operating expense. See “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—

Long-lived Assets” below for information relating to these items. Under acquisition accounting rules, we revalued the 

acquired finished goods inventory of the MEN Business to fair value upon closing. This revaluation increased market-

able inventory carrying value by approximately $62.3 million, of which $48.0 million was recognized in cost of goods 

sold during fiscal 2010, adversely affecting our gross margin. See Note 2 of the Consolidated Financial Statements 

found under Item 8 of Part II of this report. As expected, our liquidity and cash and investment balance were signifi-

cantly affected by our use of cash to fund the purchase price of the MEN Acquisition and resulting acquisition and inte-

gration expense, transition service expense and investments to support working capital related to the increased scale 

of our business. In addition, our private placements of convertible notes during fiscal 2010 resulted in additional indebt-

edness. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below and Note 15 of the Consolidated Financial Statements found 

under Item 8 of Part II of this report for more information regarding our convertible notes. These and other effects on 

our financial statements described below and elsewhere in this report may make period to period comparisons difficult.

Restructuring Activities

 Since the MEN Acquisition, we have undertaken a number of restructuring activities. These actions are intended to 

reduce operating expense and better align our workforce and operating costs with market opportunities and product 

development and business strategies following the completion of our MEN Acquisition. In April 2010, we took action 

to effect a headcount reduction of approximately 70 employees, with reductions principally affecting our global prod-

uct group and global field organization outside of the EMEA region. This action resulted in a restructuring charge of 

$2.1 million in fiscal 2010. In May 2010, we announced our reorganization of portions of our business and operations in 

the EMEA region. This action resulted in a restructuring charge of $7.1 million related to the reduction in head count 

of approximately 82 employees principally in our global field and supply chain organizations. As we look to manage 

operating expense and complete integration activities for the combined operations, we will continue to assess the allo-

cation of our headcount and other resources toward key growth opportunities for our business and evaluate additional 

cost reduction measures.

Issuance of Convertible Notes during Fiscal 2010

On March 15, 2010, we completed a private placement of $375.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.0% convert-

ible senior notes due March 15, 2015. The net proceeds from the offering were $364.3 million after deducting the place-

ment agents’ fees and other fees and expenses. We used $243.8 million of the net proceeds to replace the contractual 

obligation to issue convertible notes to Nortel as part of the purchase price for the MEN Acquisition. The remaining pro-

ceeds were used to reduce the cash on hand required to fund the aggregate purchase price of the MEN Acquisition. On 

44

Ciena Corporation 10-K

October 18, 2010, we completed a private placement $350.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 3.75% convertible 

senior notes due October 15, 2018. The net proceeds from the offering were approximately $340.4 million after deduct-

ing the placement agents’ fees and other fees and expenses. We used approximately $76.1 million of the net proceeds 

of the offering to repurchase in privately negotiated transactions approximately $81.8 million in aggregate principal 

amount of our 0.25% convertible senior notes due May 1, 2013. We intend to use the remainder of the net proceeds for 

general corporate purposes, which may include the repayment at maturity or further repurchase, from time to time, of a 

portion of our outstanding 0.25% convertible senior notes due May 1, 2013. See Note 15 of the Consolidated Financial 

Statements found under Item 8 of Part II of this report for more information regarding our outstanding convertible notes.

Global Market Conditions and Competitive Landscape

We continue to experience cautious customer behavior with respect to spending as a result of the sustained period 

of economic weakness and macroeconomic uncertainty. Broad economic weakness has previously resulted in periods 

of decreased demand for our products and services that have adversely affected our results of operations. We remain 

uncertain as to how long current macroeconomic and industry conditions will persist, the pace of recovery, and the 

magnitude of the effect of these market conditions on our business and results of operations.

At the same time we are experiencing challenging macroeconomic conditions, we have encountered an increasingly 

competitive marketplace. Competition has intensified, in part, due to our increased market share, technology leader-

ship and global presence resulting from the MEN Acquisition. Following the MEN Acquisition, we have experienced 

increased customer activity and been afforded increased consideration and opportunities to participate in competition 

for network builds and upgrades, including in emerging geographies and new markets or applications for our products. 

Securing these opportunities often requires that we agree to aggressive or less favorable commercial terms and condi-

tions, including financial commitments, that may require collateralized standby letters of credit resulting in an increase 

in our restricted cash. Competition has also intensified as we and our competitors more aggressively seek to secure 

market share, particularly in connection with new network build opportunities, and displace incumbent equipment 

vendors at large carrier customers. We expect this level of competition to continue and, as larger Chinese equipment 

vendors seek to gain entry into the U.S. market, potentially increase.

Despite challenging and competitive market conditions, we believe that a number of important underlying drivers rep-

resent significant long-term opportunities and growing demand for converged optical Ethernet networking solutions 

in our target markets. We believe that market trends including the proliferation of mobile web applications, prevalence 

of video applications and shift of enterprise applications to the cloud or virtualized environments are emblematic of 

increased use and dependence by consumers and enterprises upon a growing variety of broadband applications and 

services. These services will continue to add network traffic and consume available bandwidth, requiring our customers 

to invest in high-capacity, next-generation network infrastructures that are more efficient and robust, and better able to 

handle multiservice traffic and increased transmission rates. See “Strategy” set forth in Item 1 “Business” above in this 

report for information regarding our strategy and plan to capitalize on these market dynamics.

Financial Results

Revenue for the fourth quarter was $417.6 million, which represented a sequential increase of 7.2% from $389.7 million 

in the third quarter of fiscal 2010. Fourth quarter revenue reflects $255.6 million in revenue from the MEN Business 

and $162.0 million related to Ciena’s pre-acquisition portfolio. Additional revenue-related details reflecting sequential 

changes from the third quarter of fiscal 2010 include:

•	 Product	revenue	for	the	fourth	quarter	of	fiscal	2010	increased	by	$29.0	million,	reflecting	a	$33.0	million	increase	

in sales of products from the MEN Business and a $4.0 million decrease in sales of Ciena’s pre-acquisition prod-

ucts. Packet-Optical Transport revenue increased by $40.3 million, reflecting a $31.2 million increase in sales of 

products from the MEN Business and a $9.1 million increase in Ciena’s pre-acquisition Packet-Optical Transport 

products. Product revenue also reflects an increase of $5.9 million in software sales. These increases were partially 

offset by a $13.4 million decrease in sales of Packet-Optical Switching products and a $3.8 million decrease in 

sales of Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery products.

Ciena Corporation 10-K

45

•	 Service	revenue	for	the	fourth	quarter	of	fiscal	2010	decreased	by	$1.1	million,	reflecting	a	$1.9	million	decrease	in	sales	

of Ciena’s pre-acquisition service offerings and a $0.8 million increase in service revenue from the MEN Business.

•	 Revenue	from	the	United	States	for	the	fourth	quarter	of	fiscal	2010	was	$210.1	million,	a	decrease	from	$229.7	mil- 

lion in the third quarter of fiscal 2010. This decline reflects a decrease of $30.3 million in sales of Ciena’s pre-

acquisition portfolio and a $10.7 million increase in sales of products and services from the MEN Business.

•	

International	revenue	for	the	fourth	quarter	of	fiscal	2010	was	$207.6	million,	an	increase	from	$159.9	million	in	the	

third quarter of fiscal 2010. This increase reflects an increase of $32.2 million in sales of products and services from 

the MEN Business and $15.5 million in sales of Ciena’s pre-acquisition portfolio.

•	 As	a	percentage	of	revenue,	international	revenue	was	49.7%	during	the	fourth	quarter	of	fiscal	2010,	an	increase	

from 41.0% in the third quarter of fiscal 2010.

•	 For	the	fourth	quarter	of	fiscal	2010,	one	customer	accounted	for	greater	than	10%	of	revenue,	representing	15.2%	

of total revenue. This compares to two customers that accounted for 33.7% of revenue in the aggregate in the 

third quarter of fiscal 2010.

Revenue for fiscal 2010 was $1,236.6 million as compared to $652.6 million in fiscal 2009. Fiscal 2010 revenue consisted 

of $530.9 million from the MEN Business and $705.7 million in sales from Ciena’s pre-acquisition portfolio. Fiscal 2010 

revenue reflects increases of $406.5 million in Packet-Optical Transport, $127.2 million in Software and Services, and 

$104.0 million in Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery. These increases were partially offset by a $53.6 million decrease 

in Packet-Optical Switching. See “Results of Operations—Fiscal 2009 compared to Fiscal 2010” below for additional 

information regarding annual results.

Gross margin for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 was 40.3%, an increase from 37.0% in the third quarter of fiscal 2010. 

Gross margin for the fourth quarter fiscal 2010 benefited from increased software sales. Gross margin for the third 

quarter was adversely affected by higher costs associated with the revaluation of acquired inventory from the MEN 

Acquisition described above. Gross margin for fiscal 2010 was 40.2%, as compared to 43.6% in fiscal 2009. Product gross 

margin was 40.9% in fiscal 2010, a decrease from 45.9% in fiscal 2009. Gross margin for fiscal 2010 reflects the adverse 

effect of the valuation of inventory, which resulted in a $48.0 million increase in cost of goods sold during fiscal 2010. 

Lower gross margin during fiscal 2010 also reflects less favorable product and geographic mix. Specifically, fiscal 2010 

gross margin was adversely affected by a $53.6 million decrease in sales of Packet-Optical Switching products and geo-

graphic mix, including a higher concentration of international revenue as a percentage of total revenue.

Operating expense was $249.6 million for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, a slight increase from $243.6 million in the 

third quarter of fiscal 2010. Fourth quarter operating expense includes increased costs associated with variable sales 

compensation, the acceleration of certain research and development initiatives, and the build-up of internal resources 

in preparation for an exit from key transition services. These increased costs were partially offset by the non-cash, unre-

alized gain of $13.8 million related to our contingent refund right associated with the Carling lease described above. 

Operating expense for our third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2010 include $17.0 million and $18.1 million, respectively, in 

acquisition and integration-related costs associated with the MEN Acquisition. Operating expense for fiscal 2010 was 

$819.3 million, compared to $864.1 million in fiscal 2009. Operating expense for fiscal 2009 reflects a goodwill impair-

ment charge of $455.7 million. Excluding the effect of this charge, the significant increase in operating expense during 

fiscal 2010 reflects the expanded scale of our business from the MEN Acquisition. Operating expense for fiscal 2010 

also includes $101.4 million in acquisition and integration-related costs and a $74.6 million increase in amortization of 

intangible assets, as compared to fiscal 2009, as a result of the MEN Acquisition.

Our loss from operations was $81.2 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 and $99.6 million in the third quarter of fiscal 

2010. Our loss from operations for fiscal 2010 was $321.8 million. This compares to a loss from operations of $579.2 million 

in fiscal 2009. Our net loss was $80.3 million, or $0.86 per share, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, and $109.9 million, 

or $1.18 per share, in the third quarter of fiscal 2010. Our net loss for fiscal 2010 was $333.5 million, or $3.58 per share. 

This compares to a net loss of $581.2 million, or $6.37 per share, in fiscal 2009. Net loss and operating loss for fiscal 2009 

reflect the effect of a goodwill impairment charge during the second quarter of fiscal 2009 described above.

46

Ciena Corporation 10-K

We used $25.8 million in cash from operations during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010. Changes in working capital 

provided $2.0 million and net losses (adjusted for non-cash charges) used $27.8 million. Cash used from operations 

includes payments of $12.7 million related to acquisition and integration-related expense and restructuring costs, of 

which $9.9 million was reflected in changes in working capital and $22.6 million was reflected in net losses (adjusted for 

non-cash charges). This compares with the use of $130.0 million in cash from operations during the third quarter of fis-

cal 2010, consisting of $108.9 million for changes in working capital and $21.1 million from net losses (adjusted for non-

cash charges). Cash used from operations in the third quarter includes payments of $28.0 million related to acquisition 

and integration-related expense and restructuring, of which $8.8 million was reflected in changes in working capital 

and $19.2 million was reflected in net losses (adjusted for non-cash charges).

We used $229.0 million in cash from operations during fiscal 2010, consisting of $112.2 million for changes in working 

capital and $116.8 million from net losses (adjusted for non-cash charges). Cash used from operations includes payments 

of $91.7 million related to acquisition and integration-related expense and restructuring costs, of which $18.2 million was 

reflected in changes in working capital and $109.9 million was reflected in net losses (adjusted for non-cash charges). This 

compares with cash generated from operations of $7.4 million in fiscal 2009, consisting of $3.8 million in cash from net 

income (adjusted for non-cash charges) and cash of $3.6 million from changes in working capital.

At October 31, 2010, we had $688.7 million in cash and cash equivalents. This compares to $470.2 million in cash and 

cash equivalents and $0.2 million of short-term investments as of July 31, 2010.

As of October 31, 2010, headcount was 4,201, a decrease from 4,214 at July 31, 2010, and an increase from 2,163 and 

2,203 at October 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Results of operations

Our results of operations for the periods in fiscal 2010 reflect the operations of the MEN Business beginning on the 

March 19, 2010 acquisition date. We reorganized our internal organizational structure and the management of our busi-

ness upon the MEN Acquisition, and as described in Note 20 of the Consolidated Financial Statements found under 

Item 8 of Part II of this report, present our results of operations based upon the following operating segments:

•	 Packet-OPtical	transPOrt	includes optical transport solutions that increase network capacity and enable 

more rapid delivery of a broader mix of high-bandwidth services. These products are used by network operators 

to facilitate the cost effective and efficient transport of voice, video and data traffic in core networks, as well as 

regional, metro and access networks. Our principal products in this segment include the ActivFlex 6500 Packet-

Optical	Platform	(ActivFlex	6500);	ActivFlex	6110	Multiservice	Optical	Platform	(ActivFlex	6110);	ActivSpan	5200	

(ActivSpan	5200);	ActivSpan	Common	Photonic	Layer	(CPL);	Optical	Multiservice	Edge	1000	series	(OME	1000);	

and Optical Metro 3500 (OM 3500) from the MEN Business. This segment includes sales of our ActivSpan 4200® 

FlexSelect® Advanced Services Platform (ActivSpan 4200) and our Corestream® Agility Optical Transport System 

(Corestream)	from	Ciena’s	pre-acquisition	portfolio.	This	segment	also	includes	sales	from	legacy	SONET/SDH	

products and legacy data networking products, as well as certain enterprise-oriented transport solutions that 

support storage and LAN extension, interconnection of data centers, and virtual private networks. This segment 

also includes operating system software and enhanced software features embedded in each of these products. 

Revenue from this segment is included in product revenue on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

•	 Packet-OPtical	switching	includes optical switching platforms that enable automated optical infrastruc-

tures for the delivery of a wide variety of enterprise and consumer-oriented network services. Our principal prod-

ucts in this segment include our CoreDirector®	Multiservice	Optical	Switch,	CoreDirector	FS;	and	our	ActivFlex	

5400 family of Reconfigurable Switching Systems. These products include multiservice, multi-protocol switching 

systems	that	consolidate	the	functionality	of	an	add/drop	multiplexer,	digital	cross-connect	and	packet	switch	

into a single, high-capacity intelligent switching system. These products address both the core and metro seg-

ments	of	communications	networks	and	support	key	managed	service	services,	Ethernet/TDM	Private	Line,	

Triple Play and IP services. This segment also includes sales of operating system software and enhanced software 

Ciena Corporation 10-K

47

features embedded in each of these products. Revenue from this segment is included in product revenue on the 

Consolidated Statement of Operations.

•	 carrier	ethernet	service	Delivery	includes the ActivEdge 3900 family of service delivery switches and 

service aggregation switches, as well as the ActivEdge 5100 family. These products support the access and 

aggregation tiers of communications networks and have principally been deployed to support wireless backhaul 

infrastructures and business data services. Employing sophisticated Carrier Ethernet switching technology, these 

products deliver quality of service capabilities, virtual local area networking and switching functions, and carrier-

grade operations, administration, and maintenance features. This segment includes the metro Ethernet routing 

switch (MERS) product line from the MEN Business and our legacy broadband products, including our CNX-5 

Broadband DSL System (CNX-5), that transitions legacy voice networks to support Internet-based (IP) telephony, 

video services and DSL. This segment also includes sales of operating system software and enhanced software 

features embedded in each of these products. Revenue from this segment is included in product revenue on the 

Consolidated Statement of Operations.

•	 sOftware	anD	services	includes our integrated network and service management software designed to 

automate and simplify network management and operation, while increasing network performance and function-

ality. These software solutions can track individual services across multiple product suites, facilitating planned 

network maintenance, outage detection and identification of customers or services affected by network troubles. 

This segment also includes a broad range of consulting and support services, including installation and deploy-

ment, maintenance support, consulting, network design and training activities. Except for revenue from the 

software portion of this segment, which is included in product revenue, revenue from this segment is included in 

services revenue on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Fiscal 2009 Compared to Fiscal 2010

Revenue

The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in our operating segment revenue for 

the periods indicated:

Revenue:

FiscaL Year 

2009 

%* 

2010 

%* 

iNcrease
(decrease) 

Packet-Optical Transport 

Packet-Optical Switching 

Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery 

Software and Services 

$299,088 

165,705 

75,125 

112,711 

45.8 

25.4 

11.5 

17.3 

$   705,551 

112,058 

179,083 

239,944 

57.0 

9.1 

14.5 

19.4 

$406,463 

(53,647) 

103,958 

127,233 

Consolidated revenue 

$652,629 

100.0 

$1,236,636 

100.0 

$584,007 

*  Denotes % of total revenue
**  Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010

%**

135.9

(32.4)

138.4

112.9

89.5

•	 Packet-OPtical	transPOrt	revenue for fiscal 2010 reflects the addition of $409.6 million in revenue from 

the MEN Business. The addition of MEN Business revenue reflects $208.0 million of sales relating to ActivFlex 

6500, largely driven by service provider demand for high-capacity, coherent transport, in support of 40G and 

100G network infrastructures. Packet-Optical Transport revenue also benefited from the addition of sales from 

the MEN Business of $115.8 million of ActivSpan 5200, $39.1 million of CPL, $16.2 million of OM 3500, $15.5 million 

of legacy and other transport products and $15.0 million of ActivFlex 6110. Packet-Optical Transport revenue ben-

efited from a $13.2 million increase in ActivSpan 4200 revenue during fiscal 2010, largely driven by metro network 

builds and latency sensitive applications. These increases were offset by an $11.5 million decrease in Corestream 

sales and a $4.8 million decrease in sales of legacy and other Packet-Optical Transport products.

•	 Packet-OPtical	switching	revenue decreased reflecting a $53.6 million decline in CoreDirector revenue. 

Packet-Optical Switching revenue principally reflects our CoreDirector platform, which has a concentrated customer 

48

Ciena Corporation 10-K

 
 
base. As a result, revenue can fluctuate considerably depending upon individual customer purchasing decisions. We 

believe Packet-Optical Switching product revenue was also adversely affected in fiscal 2010 by deferred customer 

purchasing decisions and the effect of carrier sales cycles as we effect a platform transition from CoreDirector to our 

next-generation, high-capacity ActivFlex 5400 family of Reconfigurable Switching Systems.

•	 carrier	ethernet	service	Delivery	revenue increased significantly, reflecting an $86.5 million increase in 

sales of our ActivEdge 3900 service-delivery switches and ActivEdge 5100 service aggregation switches in sup-

port of wireless backhaul deployments. Quarterly revenue for these products remains subject to fluctuation due 

to customer concentration and customer buying cycles. Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery revenue also benefitted 

from the addition of $9.6 million in sales of our MERS product from the MEN Business and an $8.2 million increase 

in CNX-5 sales in support of residential DSL.

•	 sOftware	anD	services	revenue increased primarily due to the addition of $86.6 million in maintenance 

support revenue and $20.8 million in installation and deployment services from the MEN Business. Segment rev-

enue also benefited from a $14.9 million increase in maintenance support revenue from Ciena’s pre-acquisition 

portfolio and a $4.9 million increase in software revenue.

Revenue from sales to customers outside of the United States is reflected as International in the geographic distribution 

of revenue below. The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in geographic distri-

bution of revenue for the periods indicated:

2009 

$419,405 

233,224 

FiscaL Year 

%* 

64.3 

35.7 

2010 

$   744,232 

492,404 

%* 

60.2 

39.8 

iNcrease
(decrease) 

$324,827 

259,180 

$652,629 

100.0 

$1,236,636 

100.0 

$584,007 

%**

77.4

111.1

89.5 

United States 

International 

Total 

*  Denotes % of total revenue
**  Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010

•	 uniteD	states	revenue increased primarily due to a $189.8 million increase in sales of Packet-Optical 

Transport products, principally as a result of the MEN Acquisition, a $94.1 million increase in sales of Carrier 

Ethernet Service Delivery products, and a $72.5 million increase in services revenue. These increases offset a 

$34.3 million decrease in Packet-Optical Switching revenue.

•	

internatiOnal	revenue increased primarily due to a $216.7 million increase in Packet-Optical Transport rev-

enue, principally as a result of the MEN Acquisition, a $49.8 million increase in services revenue and a $9.9 million 

increase in sales of Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery products. These increases offset a $19.4 million decrease in 

Packet-Optical Switching revenue.

While our concentration in revenue has lessened somewhat as a result of the MEN Acquisition, a sizable portion of our 

revenue continues to come from sales to a small number of service providers, particularly within our Packet-Optical 

Switching and Carrier-Ethernet Service Delivery businesses. As a result, our results are significantly affected by spend-

ing levels and the business challenges encountered by our largest customers. Moreover, our contracts do not have 

terms that obligate these customers to purchase any minimum or specific amounts of equipment or services. Our con-

centration of revenue can be adversely affected by consolidation activity among our large customers. In addition, some 

of our customers are pursuing efforts to outsource the management and operation of their networks, or have indicated 

a procurement strategy to reduce the number of vendors from which they purchase equipment. In April 2010, we were 

selected as a domain network equipment supplier by AT&T for its optical transport network and metro and core trans-

port domains. Being named as a vendor in multiple technology domains under this program affords us an opportunity 

to forge a more collaborative technology relationship across these product platforms. Sales to AT&T were $128.2 million 

or 19.6% of our revenue in fiscal 2009 and $267.4 million or 21.6% of our revenue in fiscal 2010. We did not have any other 

customers accounting for greater than 10% of revenue in fiscal 2009 or 2010.

Ciena Corporation 10-K

49

 
 
Cost of Goods Sold and Gross Profit

Product cost of goods sold consists primarily of amounts paid to third-party contract manufacturers, component costs, 

employee-related costs and overhead, shipping and logistics costs associated with manufacturing-related operations, 

warranty and other contractual obligations, royalties, license fees, amortization of intangible assets, cost of excess and 

obsolete inventory and, when applicable, estimated losses on committed customer contracts.

Services cost of goods sold consists primarily of direct and third-party costs, including employee-related costs, associ-

ated with our provision of services including installation, deployment, maintenance support, consulting and training 

activities, and, when applicable, estimated losses on committed customer contracts.

Gross profit as a percentage of revenue, or “gross margin,” continues to be susceptible to quarterly fluctuation due to 

a number of factors. Gross margin can vary significantly depending upon the mix and concentration of products, the 

mix of lower margin common equipment, geographic mix and the mix of customers and services in a given fiscal quar-

ter. Gross margin can also be affected by our introduction of new products, charges for excess and obsolete inventory, 

changes in warranty costs and sales volume. Gross margin can also be adversely affected by the competitive environ-

ment and level of pricing pressure we encounter. The combination of uncertain market conditions, recent constraints 

on customer capital expenditures and increased competition has resulted in a heightened customer focus on pricing 

and return on network investment, as customers address network traffic growth and strive to increase revenue and 

profit. Our exposure to pricing pressure has been most severe in metro and core applications for our Packet-Optical 

Transport platforms, which we expect will comprise a greater percentage of our overall revenue as a result of the MEN 

Acquisition. As a result, and in an effort to retain or secure customers, enter new markets or capture market share, in 

the past we have and in the future we may agree to pricing or other unfavorable commercial terms that result in lower or 

negative gross margins on a particular order or group of orders. These arrangements would adversely affect our gross 

margins and results of operations. We expect that gross margins will also be subject to fluctuation based on our level of 

success in driving cost reductions and rationalizing our supply chain and third party contract manufacturers as part of 

the MEN Acquisition integration activities.

Service gross margin can be affected by the mix of customers and services, particularly the mix between deployment 

and maintenance services, geographic mix and the timing and extent of any investments in internal resources to sup-

port this business.

The tables below (in thousands, except percentage data) set forth the changes in revenue, cost of goods sold and gross 

profit for the periods indicated:

Total revenue 

Total cost of goods sold 

Gross profit 

*  Denotes % of total revenue
**  Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010

Product revenue 

Product cost of goods sold 

Product gross profit 

*  Denotes % of product revenue
**  Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010

FiscaL Year 

2009 

$652,629 

367,799 

$284,830 

%* 

100.0 

56.4 

43.6 

2010 

$1,236,636  

739,135  

$   497,501 

%* 

100.0 

59.8 

40.2 

iNcrease
(decrease) 

$584,007 

371,336 

$212,671 

2009 

$547,522 

296,170 

$251,352 

FiscaL Year 

%* 

100.0  

54.1 

45.9 

2010 

$1,009,239 

596,704 

$   412,535 

%* 

100.0  

59.1 

40.9 

iNcrease
(decrease) 

$461,717 

300,534 

$161,183 

%**

89.5

101.0

74.7

%**

84.3

101.5

64.1

50

Ciena Corporation 10-K

 
 
 
 
FiscaL Year 

2009 

$105,107 

71,629 

$  33,478 

%* 

100.0 

68.1 

31.9 

2010 

$227,397 

142,431 

$  84,966 

%* 

100.0 

62.6 

37.4 

iNcrease
(decrease) 

$122,290 

70,802 

$  51,488 

%**

116.3

98.8

153.8

Service revenue 

Service cost of goods sold 

Service gross profit 

*  Denotes % of service revenue
**  Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010

•	 grOss	PrOfit	as	a	Percentage	Of	revenue decreased due to lower product gross margins described 

below, partially offset by improved service gross margin.

•	 grOss	PrOfit	On	PrODucts	as	a	Percentage	Of	PrODuct	revenue decreased due to a number of 

items relating to the MEN Acquisition that increased costs of goods sold during fiscal 2010. These items include 

the revaluation of inventory described in “Overview” above, excess purchase commitment losses on Ciena’s 

pre-acquisition inventory relating to product rationalization decisions, and increased amortization of intangible 

assets. Fiscal 2010 gross profit was also adversely affected by a lower concentration of Packet-Optical Switching 

revenue. These additional costs were offset by lower warranty and excess and obsolete inventory charges as com-

pared to fiscal 2009. Gross margin for fiscal 2009 was negatively affected by a $5.8 million charge related to two 

committed customer sales contracts that resulted in a negative gross margin on the initial phases of the custom-

ers’ deployment.

•	 grOss	PrOfit	On	services	as	a	Percentage	Of	services	revenue increased due to higher concentration 

of maintenance support and professional services as a percentage of revenue, and improved operational efficiencies.

Operating Expense

Research and development expense primarily consists of salaries and related employee expense (including share-

based compensation expense), prototype costs relating to design, development, testing of our products, depreciation 

expense and third-party consulting costs.

Sales and marketing expense primarily consists of salaries, commissions and related employee expense (including 

share-based compensation expense), and sales and marketing support expense, including travel, demonstration units, 

trade show expense, and third-party consulting costs.

General and administrative expense primarily consists of salaries and related employee expense (including share-based 

compensation expense), and costs for third-party consulting and other services.

Amortization of intangible assets primarily reflects purchased technology and customer relationships from our acquisitions.

Ciena Corporation 10-K

51

 
 
Excluding the effect of the goodwill impairment charges in fiscal 2009, increased operating expense for fiscal 2010 

principally reflects the increased scale of our business resulting from the MEN Acquisition on March 19, 2010. The table 

below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in operating expense for the periods indicated:

FiscaL Year 

2009 

$190,319 

134,527 

47,509 

— 

24,826 

11,207 

455,673 

—	

$864,061 

%* 

29.2 

20.6 

7.3 

0.0 

3.8 

1.7 

69.8 

0.0	

132.4 

2010 

$327,626 

193,515 

102,692 

101,379 

99,401 

8,514 

— 

(13,807)	

$819,320 

%* 

26.5 

15.6 

8.3 

8.2 

8.0 

0.7 

0.0 

n/a	

66.2 

iNcrease
(decrease) 

$ 137,307 

58,988 

55,183 

101,379 

74,575 

(2,693) 

(455,673) 

(13,807)	

$  (44,741) 

%**

72.1 

43.8 

116.2 

100.0 

300.4 

(24.0)

(100.0)

100.0	

(5.2)

Research and development 

Selling and marketing 

General and administrative 

Acquisition and integration costs 

Amortization of intangible assets 

Restructuring costs 

Goodwill impairment 

Change in fair value of  
	 contingent	consideration	

Total operating expenses 

*  Denotes % of total revenue
**  Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010

•	 research	anD	DevelOPment	exPense was adversely affected by $13.9 million in foreign exchange rates, 

primarily due to the weakening of the U.S. dollar in relation to the Canadian dollar. The $137.3 million increase 

primarily reflects increases of $65.6 million in employee compensation and related costs, $34.6 million in profes-

sional services and fees, $17.4 million in facilities and information systems, $12.2 million in depreciation expense 

and $4.9 million in prototype expense related to the development initiatives described above.

•	 selling	anD	marketing	exPense benefited by $1.6 million in foreign exchange rates primarily due to the 

strengthening of the U.S. dollar in relation to the Euro. The $59.0 million increase primarily reflects increases of 

$41.8 million in employee compensation and related costs, $6.4 million in travel-related expenditures, $4.3 million 

in facilities and information systems and $2.8 million in professional services and fees.

•	 general	anD	aDministrative	exPense increased by $21.9 million in consulting service expense, $17.7 mil-

lion in facilities and information systems expense and $11.7 million in employee compensation and related costs.

•	 acquisitiOn	anD	integratiOn	cOsts are related to the MEN Acquisition. As of October 31, 2010, we have 

incurred $101.4 million in transaction, consulting and third party service fees. We expect to incur approximately 

$58.0 million in additional expense relating to acquisition and integration activities in fiscal 2011, a significant por-

tion of which will be recognized as operating expense.

•	 amOrtizatiOn	Of	intangible	assets increased due to the acquisition of additional intangible assets as a 

result of the MEN Acquisition. See Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of Part II of this report.

•	 restructuring	cOsts for fiscal 2010 primarily reflect the headcount reductions and restructuring activities 

described in the “Overview—Restructuring Activities” above.

•	 gOODwill	imPairment	cOsts reflect the impairment of goodwill and resulting charge incurred in fiscal 2009 

as described in Note 4 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of Part II of this report.

•	 change	in	fair	value	Of	cOntingent	cOnsiDeratiOn is related to the contingent refund right we received 

relating to the Carling lease entered into as part of the MEN Acquisition. As a result of a change in circumstances 

and outcome probabilities during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, we recorded a $13.8 million change in fair value. 

See Notes 2 and 23 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of Part II for additional information relating to 

the early termination of the Carling lease.

52

Ciena Corporation 10-K

 
 
Other Items

The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in other items for the periods indicated:

FiscaL Year 

Interest and other income, net 

Interest expense 

Loss on cost method investments 

Gain on extinguishment of debt 

2009 

$ 9,487 

$ 7,406 

$ 5,328 

$ 

  — 

%* 

1.5 

1.1 

0.8 

0.0 

Provision (benefit) for income taxes 

$(1,324) 

(0.2) 

2010 

$  3,917 

$18,619 

$ 

   — 

$  4,948 

$  1,941 

%* 

0.3 

1.5 

0.0 

0.4 

0.2 

iNcrease
(decrease) 

$ (5,570) 

$11,213 

$ (5,328) 

$  4,948 

$  3,265 

%**

(58.7)

151.4 

(100.0)

100.0 

(246.6)

*  Denotes % of total revenue
**  Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010

•	

interest	anD	Other	incOme,	net decreased as a result of a $9.5 million decrease in interest income due to 

lower interest rates and lower invested balances. Decreased interest and other income, net also reflects a $2.0 mil-

lion charge relating to the termination of an indemnification asset upon the expiration of the statute of limitations 

applicable to one of the uncertain tax contingencies acquired as part of the MEN Acquisition. These items were 

partially offset by a $3.8 million gain due to the positive effect of foreign exchange rates on assets and liabilities 

denominated in currency other than the relevant functional currency, and a $2.5 million non-cash gain related to 

the change in fair value of the redemption feature associated with our 4.0% convertible senior notes due March 15, 

2015. See Notes 7 and 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements found under Item 8 of Part II of this report for 

more information regarding the issuance of these convertible notes and the fair value of the redemption feature 

contained therein.

•	

interest	exPense increased due to our private placements during fiscal 2010 of $375.0 million in aggregate 

principal amount of 4.0% convertible senior notes due March 15, 2015 and $350.0 million in aggregate princi-

pal amount of 3.75% convertible senior notes due October 15, 2018. See Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial 

Statements found under Item 8 of Part II of this report.

•	 lOss	On	cOst	methOD	investments during fiscal 2009 was due to the decline in value of our investments in 

two privately held technology companies that were determined to be other-than-temporary.

•	 gain	On	extinguishment	Of	Debt for fiscal 2010 resulted from our repurchase of $81.8 million in aggregate 

principal amount of our outstanding 0.25% convertible notes in privately negotiated transactions for $76.1 million. 

We recorded a gain on the extinguishment of debt in the amount of $4.9 million, which consists of the $5.7 million 

gain from the repurchase of the notes, less $0.8 million of associated debt issuance costs.

•	 PrOvisiOn	(benefit)	fOr	incOme	taxes increased primarily due to a decrease in refundable federal tax credits.

Fiscal 2008 Compared to Fiscal 2009

Revenue

Revenue for fiscal 2009 reflects the weakness, volatility and uncertainty presented by the global market conditions that 

we encountered during the year. Our fiscal 2009 revenue reflects cautious spending, primarily among our largest ser-

vice provider customers, as they sought to conserve capital, reduce debt or address uncertainties or changes in their 

own business models brought on by broader market challenges.

Ciena Corporation 10-K

53

 
 
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in our operating segment revenue for 

the periods indicated:

Revenue:

FiscaL Year 

2008 

%* 

2009 

%* 

Packet-Optical Transport 

Packet-Optical Switching 

Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery 

Software and Services 

$447,542 

270,458 

60,499 

123,949 

49.6 

30.0 

6.7 

13.7 

$299,088 

165,705 

75,125 

112,711 

45.8 

25.4 

11.5 

17.3 

iNcrease
(decrease) 

$(148,454) 

(104,753) 

14,626  

(11,238) 

Consolidated revenue 

$902,448 

100.0 

$652,629 

100.0 

$(249,819) 

*  Denotes % of total revenue
**  Denotes % change from fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2009

%**

(33.2)

(38.7)

24.2

(9.1)

(27.7)

•	 Packet-OPtical	transPOrt	revenue decreased primarily due to decreases of $108.1 million in Corestream 

and $40.9 million in legacy transport and data networking systems. These declines were primarily due to unfavor-

able market conditions as described above. In spite of these market conditions, revenue from our ActivSpan 4200 

was unchanged during fiscal 2009.

•	 Packet-OPtical	switching	revenue decreased reflecting a decline in CoreDirector revenue. We believe 

the decline in CoreDirector revenue was due to unfavorable market conditions and constrained spending. 

Revenue for this segment is subject to significant fluctuations due to its highly concentrated customer base.

•	 carrier	ethernet	service	Delivery	revenue increased due to a $33.8 million increase in sales of our 

ActivEdge 3900 service-delivery switches and ActivEdge 5100 service aggregation switches in support of wire-

less backhaul deployments. This increase was partially offset by a $19.2 million decrease in CNX-5 sales.

•	 sOftware	anD	services	revenue decreased primarily due to a $10.9 million decrease in deployment ser-

vices due to lower sales volume and installation activity.

Revenue from sales to customers outside of the United States is reflected as International in the geographic distribution 

of revenue below. The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in geographic distri-

bution of revenue for the periods indicated:

FiscaL Year 

2008 

$590,868 

311,580 

$902,448 

%* 

65.5 

34.5 

100.0 

2009 

$419,405 

233,224 

$652,629 

%* 

64.3 

35.7 

iNcrease
(decrease) 

$(171,463) 

(78,356) 

100.0 

$(249,819) 

%**

(29.0)

(25.1)

(27.7)

United States 

International 

Total 

*  Denotes % of total revenue
**  Denotes % change from 2008 to 2009

•	 uniteD	states	revenue decreased primarily due to a $90.0 million decrease in sales of Packet-Optical Transport 

products, principally as a result of lower Corestream sales, an $87.0 million decrease in sales of Packet-Optical 

Switching products and a $4.7 million decrease in sales of software and services. These decreases were partially 

offset by a $10.2 million increase in sales of Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery products.

•	

internatiOnal	revenue decreased primarily due to a $58.5 million decrease in sales of Packet-Optical 

Transport products, a $17.8 million decrease in sales of Packet-Optical Switching products and a $6.5 million 

decrease in sales of software and services. These decreases were partially offset by a $4.4 million increase in 

sales of Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery products.

54

Ciena Corporation 10-K

 
 
 
 
Certain customers each accounted for at least 10% of our revenue for the periods indicated (in thousands, except per-

centage data) as follows:

AT&T 

BT	

Total 

2008 

$227,737 

113,981	

$341,718 

FiscaL Year

%* 

25.2 

12.6	

37.8 

2009 

$128,233 

n/a	

$128,233 

%*

19.6 

—

19.6 

n/a	Denotes	revenue	representing	less	than	10%	of	total	revenue	for	the	period
*  Denotes % of total revenue

Gross Profit and Cost of Good Sold

The tables below (in thousands, except percentage data) set forth the changes in revenue, cost of goods sold and gross 

profit for the periods indicated:

Total revenue 

Total cost of goods sold 

Gross profit 

*  Denotes % of total revenue
**  Denotes % change from 2008 to 2009

Product revenue 

Product cost of goods sold 

Product gross profit 

*  Denotes % of product revenue
**  Denotes % change from 2008 to 2009

Service revenue 

Service cost of goods sold 

Service gross profit 

*  Denotes % of service revenue
**  Denotes % change from 2008 to 2009

FiscaL Year 

2008 

$902,448 

451,521 

$450,927 

%* 

100.0 

50.0 

50.0 

2009 

$652,629 

367,799 

$284,830 

FiscaL Year 

2008 

$791,415 

371,238 

$420,177 

%* 

100.0 

46.9 

53.1 

2009 

$547,522 

296,170 

$251,352 

FiscaL Year 

2008 

$111,033 

80,283 

$  30,750 

%* 

100.0 

72.3 

27.7 

2009 

$105,107 

71,629 

$  33,478 

%* 

100.0 

56.4 

43.6 

%* 

100.0 

54.1 

45.9 

%* 

100.0 

68.1 

31.9 

iNcrease
(decrease) 

$(249,819) 

(83,722) 

$(166,097) 

iNcrease
(decrease) 

$(243,893) 

(75,068) 

$(168,825) 

iNcrease
(decrease) 

$(5,926) 

(8,654) 

$ 2,728 

%**

(27.7)

(18.5)

(36.8)

%**

(30.8)

(20.2)

(40.2)

%**

(5.3)

(10.8)

8.9

•	 grOss	PrOfit	as	a	Percentage	Of	revenue decreased due to lower product gross margins described 

below, partially offset by improved service gross margin.

•	 grOss	PrOfit	On	PrODucts	as	a	Percentage	Of	PrODuct	revenue decreased due to less favorable 

product and geographic mix, including fewer sales of Packet-Optical Switching products as a percentage of total 

revenue, increased charges related to losses on committed customer sales contracts and higher charges relating 

to warranty. Gross profit as a percentage of revenue for fiscal 2008 reflects a $5.3 million increase in product cost 

of goods sold related to the revaluation of the acquired inventory from our acquisition of World Wide Packets. 

See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of Part II of this report.

•	 grOss	PrOfit	On	services	as	a	Percentage	Of	services	revenue increased due to higher sales of 

maintenance contracts as a percentage of services revenue. Services gross margin remains heavily dependent 

upon the mix of services in a given period and may fluctuate from quarter to quarter.

Ciena Corporation 10-K

55

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating Expense

The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in operating expense for the periods 

indicated:

FiscaL Year 

Research and development 

Selling and marketing 

General and administrative 

Amortization of intangible assets 

Restructuring costs 

Goodwill impairment 

2008 

$175,023 

152,018 

68,639 

32,264 

1,110 

— 

%* 

19.4 

16.8 

7.6 

3.6 

0.1 

— 

Total operating expenses 

$429,054 

47.5 

*  Denotes % of total revenue
**  Denotes % change from 2008 to 2009

2009 

$190,319 

134,527 

47,509 

24,826 

11,207 

455,673 

$864,061 

%* 

29.2 

20.6 

7.3 

3.8 

1.7 

69.8 

132.4 

iNcrease
(decrease) 

$  15,296 

(17,491) 

(21,130) 

(7,438) 

10,097 

455,673 

$435,007 

%**

8.7

(11.5)

(30.8)

(23.1)

909.6

100.0

101.4

•	 research	anD	DevelOPment	exPense benefited by $5.3 million in favorable foreign exchange rates primar-

ily due to the comparative strength of the U.S. dollar in relation to the previous year. The resulting $15.3 million net 

increase principally reflects an increase in prototype expense of $15.4 million. Other increases include $5.4 million 

in facilities and information systems expense, $2.8 million in depreciation expense, and higher employee compen-

sation cost of $0.6 million, including a $2.6 million increase in share-based compensation expense. These increases 

were partially offset by decreases of $4.8 million in consulting services expense, $2.7 million in technology related 

expenses and $0.8 million in travel expense.

•	 selling	anD	marketing	exPense benefited by $2.8 million in favorable foreign exchange rates primarily due 

to the comparative strength of the U.S. dollar in relation to the previous year. The resulting $17.5 million net change 

reflects decreases of $7.8 million in employee compensation cost, $3.0 million in travel-related costs, $2.9 million in 

marketing program costs and $2.4 million in consulting services expense. These decreases were partially offset by 

a $1.2 million increase in facilities and information systems expense.

•	 general	anD	aDministrative	exPense benefited by $0.5 million in favorable foreign exchange rates primar-

ily due to the comparative strength of the U.S. dollar in relation to the previous year. The resulting $21.1 million 

net change reflects decreases of $6.1 million in employee compensation cost, $4.1 million in consulting services 

expense, $1.7 million in facilities and information systems expense, and $0.7 million in technology-related expense. 

Expense for fiscal 2008 included $7.7 million associated with the settlement of patent litigation.

•	 amOrtizatiOn	Of	intangible	assets decreased due to certain intangible assets reaching the end of their 

useful life and becoming fully amortized during fiscal 2009.

•	 restructuring	cOsts during fiscal 2009 were primarily related to a headcount reduction of approximately 

200 employees, the closure of our Acton, Massachusetts research and development facility and revisions of 

estimates related to previously restructured facilities. Restructuring costs for fiscal 2008 principally reflects costs 

associated with a workforce reduction of 56 employees during the fourth quarter.

•	 gOODwill	imPairment reflects an impairment charge of $455.7 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2009. 

Based on a combination of factors, including the macroeconomic conditions described above and a sustained 

decline in our common stock price and market capitalization below our net book value, we conducted an interim 

impairment assessment of goodwill during the second quarter of fiscal 2009. The conclusion of this assessment 

was the write-off of all goodwill remaining on our balance sheet.

56

Ciena Corporation 10-K

 
 
Other items

The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in other items for the periods indicated:

FiscaL Year 

2008 

$36,762 

$12,927 

$  5,101 

$ 

$ 

   — 

 932 

$  2,645 

%* 

4.1 

1.4 

0.6 

— 

0.1 

0.3 

2009 

$ 9,487 

$ 7,406 

$ 

  — 

$ 5,328 

$ 

  — 

$(1,324) 

%* 

1.5 

1.1 

— 

0.8 

— 

(0.2) 

iNcrease
(decrease) 

$(27,275) 

$  (5,521) 

$  (5,101) 

$   5,328 

$     (932) 

$  (3,969) 

%**

(74.2)

(42.7)

(100.0)

100.0

(100.0)

(150.1)

Interest and other income, net 

Interest expense 

Realized loss due to impairment of  
  marketable debt investments 

Loss on cost method investments 

Gain on extinguishment of debt 

Provision (benefit) for income taxes 

*  Denotes % of total revenue
**  Denotes % change from 2008 to 2009

•	

interest	anD	Other	incOme,	net decreased due to lower average cash and investment balances and lower 

interest rates. Lower cash balances primarily relate to the repayment at maturity of the $542.3 million principal out-

standing on our 3.75% convertible notes during the first quarter of fiscal 2008 and our use of $210.0 million in cash 

consideration and related expenses associated with our acquisition of WWP in the second quarter of fiscal 2008.

•	

interest	exPense decreased primarily due to the repayment of 3.75% convertible notes at maturity at the end 

of the first quarter of fiscal 2008.

•	 realizeD	lOss	Due	tO	imPairment	Of	marketable	Debt	investments for fiscal 2008 reflects a loss 

related to commercial paper investments in two structured investment vehicles (SIVs) that entered into receiver-

ship during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 and failed to make payment at maturity. These SIVs completed their 

restructuring activities during fiscal 2008 and, as of the end of fiscal 2009, we no longer held these investments.

•	 lOss	On	cOst	methOD	investments during fiscal 2009 was due to the decline in value of our investments in 

two privately held technology companies that were determined to be other-than-temporary.

•	 gain	On	extinguishment	Of	Debt reflects our repurchase of $2.0 million in principal amount of our out-

standing 0.25% convertible senior notes due May 1, 2013 in an open market transaction. We used $1.0 million of 

our cash to effect this repurchase, which resulted in a gain of approximately $0.9 million.

•	 PrOvisiOn	(benefit)	fOr	incOme	taxes decreased primarily due to refundable federal tax credits made avail-

able by recent economic stimulus tax law changes. Availability of refundable credits expired on December 31, 2009.

Operating Segment Profit (Loss)

Segment Profit (Loss)

Segment profit (loss) is determined based on the revenue, cost of goods sold and research and development costs for 

the relevant segment. The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in our segment 

profit (loss) for the respective periods:

Segment profit (loss):

Packet-Optical Transport 

Packet-Optical Switching 

Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery 

Software and Services 

*  Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010

FiscaL Year 

2009 

2010 

iNcrease
(decrease) 

$21,535 

60,302 

(9,575) 

22,249 

$67,357 

15,173 

28,074 

53,432 

$ 45,822 

(45,129) 

37,649 

31,183 

%*

212.8

(74.8)

(393.2)

140.2

Ciena Corporation 10-K

57

 
 
 
 
•	 Packet-OPtical	transPOrt	segment	PrOfit for fiscal 2010 reflects increased sales volume resulting in addi-

tional product gross profit, partially offset by increased research and development costs due to the MEN Acquisition.

•	 Packet-OPtical	switching	segment	PrOfit declined due to decreased sales volume resulting in reduced 

product gross profit, and increased research and development costs.

•	 carrier	ethernet	service	Delivery	segment	PrOfit improved significantly due to increased sales vol-

ume resulting in additional gross profit, partially offset by increased research and development costs.

•	 sOftware	anD	services	segment	PrOfit improved due to increased sales volume and improved gross mar-

gin, both of which resulted in additional gross profit, partially offset by increased research and development costs.

The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in our segment profit (loss), including 

the presentation of prior periods to reflect the change in reportable segments, for the respective periods:

Segment profit (loss):

Packet-Optical Transport 

Packet-Optical Switching 

Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery 

Software and Services 

*  Denotes % change from 2008 to 2009

FiscaL Year 

2008 

2009 

iNcrease
(decrease) 

$110,905 

151,084 

(17,764) 

31,679 

$21,535 

60,302 

(9,575) 

22,249 

$(89,370) 

(90,782) 

8,189 

(9,430) 

%*

(80.6)

(60.1)

46.1

(29.8)

•	 Packet-OPtical	transPOrt	segment	PrOfit decreased primarily due to lower sales volume, increased 

charges related to losses on committed customer sales contracts and higher charges relating to warranty result-

ing in lower gross profit. In addition, segment profit was reduced by increased research and development costs.

•	 Packet-OPtical	switching	segment	PrOfit decreased primarily due to lower sales volume, resulting in 

reduced gross profit, partially offset by decreased research and development costs.

•	 carrier	ethernet	service	Delivery	segment	lOss improved primarily due to increased sales volume, 

resulting in higher gross profit, and decreased research and development costs.

•	 sOftware	anD	services	segment	PrOfit decreased due to lower sales volume, resulting in lower gross 

profit, and increased research and development costs.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At October 31, 2010, our principal sources of liquidity were cash and cash equivalents. The following table summarizes 

our cash and cash equivalents and investments (in thousands):

Cash and cash equivalents 

Short-term investments in marketable debt securities 

Long-term investments in marketable debt securities 

october 31, 

2009 

2010 

$   485,705 

$688,687 

563,183 

8,031 

— 

— 

iNcrease
(decrease)

$ 202,982 

(563,183)

(8,031)

Total cash and cash equivalents and investments in marketable debt securities 

$1,056,919 

$688,687 

$(368,232)

The decrease in total cash and cash equivalents and investments during fiscal 2010 was primarily related to the following:

•	 $693.2	million	related	to	the	purchase	price	for	the	MEN	Acquisition;

•	 $76.1	million	for	the	repurchase	of	a	portion	of	our	0.25%	convertible	senior	notes	due	May	1,	2013;

•	 $51.2	million	for	equipment,	furniture,	fixtures	and	intellectual	property;

•	 $24.5	million	transferred	to	restricted	cash	related	to	as	collateral	for	our	standby	letters	of	credit;	and

58

Ciena Corporation 10-K

 
 
 
 
•	 $229.0	million	cash	used	from	operations,	consisting	of	$112.2	million	for	changes	in	working	capital	and	$116.8	mil-

lion from net losses (adjusted for non-cash charges). Cash used from operations includes payments of $91.7 million 

related to acquisition and integration-related expense and restructuring costs, of which $18.2 million was reflected 

in changes in working capital and $109.9 million was reflected in net losses (adjusted for non-cash charges).

These payments were partially offset by our receipt of $364.3 million in net proceeds from the private placement of 

$375.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.0% convertible senior notes due March 15, 2015 and $340.4 million in 

net proceeds from the private placement of $350.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 3.75% convertible senior 

notes due October 15, 2018. See Notes 2 and 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of Part II of this 

report for more information regarding the MEN Acquisition and our issuance of convertible notes during fiscal 2010.

Based on past performance and current expectations, we believe that our cash and cash equivalents and cash gener-

ated from operations will satisfy our working capital needs, capital expenditures, and other liquidity requirements asso-

ciated with our existing operations through at least the next 12 months. As expected, the investment in working capital 

for fiscal 2010 reflects the increased scale of business as the result of the MEN Acquisition and the lower net working 

capital transferred to Ciena at closing, which resulted in a purchase price adjustment following the closing. We regularly 

evaluate our liquidity position and the anticipated cash needs of the business to fund our operating plans as well as any 

capital raising opportunities that may be available to us.

The following sections set forth the components of our $229.0 million of cash used by operating activities for fiscal 2010:

Net Losses (Adjusted for Non-Cash Charges)

The following table sets forth (in thousands) our net losses (adjusted for non-cash charges) for fiscal 2010:

Net loss 

Adjustments for non-cash charges: 

Gain on extinguishment of debt 

Amortization of premium on marketable debt securities 

Change in fair value of embedded redemption feature 

Change in fair value of contingent consideration 

Depreciation of equipment, furniture and fixtures, and amortization of leasehold improvements 

Share-based compensation costs 

Amortization of intangible assets 

Deferred tax provision 

Provision for inventory excess and obsolescence 

Provision for warranty 

Other 

Net losses (adjusted for non-cash charges) 

Working Capital

Accounts Receivable, net

Year eNded  
october 31, 2010

$(333,514)

(4,948)

574

(2,510)

(13,807)

42,789

35,560

127,018

700

13,696

15,353

2,296

$(116,793)

Excluding the addition of $7.1 million of unbilled Receivables recorded upon completion of the MEN Acquisition, cash 

used by accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, was $218.2 million from the end of fis-

cal 2009 through the end of fiscal 2010 due to higher sales volume. Our days sales outstanding (DSOs) increased from 

65 days for fiscal 2009 to 100 days for fiscal 2010. The significantly increased DSOs for fiscal 2010 reflect the timing of 

the MEN Acquisition and the effect on this calculation of having only a partial year of revenue from the MEN Business. 

Utilizing annualized fourth quarter revenue for purposes of this calculation would have resulted in DSOs of 74 days.

Ciena Corporation 10-K

59

 
 
The following table sets forth (in thousands) changes to our accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts 

receivable, from the end of fiscal 2009 through the end of fiscal 2010:

Accounts receivable, net 

inventory

october 31, 

2009 

$118,251 

2010 

$343,582 

iNcrease
(decrease)

$225,331 

Excluding the addition of $146.3 million of inventory recorded upon completion of the MEN Acquisition, cash con-

sumed by inventory for fiscal 2010 was $41.0 million due to increased inventory levels to support a higher sales volume. 

Our inventory turns decreased from 3.4 for fiscal 2009 to 2.3 for fiscal 2010 primarily due to effect of the mid-year MEN 

Acquisition. The significantly decreased inventory turns for fiscal 2010 reflect the timing of the MEN Acquisition and the 

effect on this calculation of having only a partial year of cost of goods sold from the MEN Business. Utilizing annualized 

fourth quarter product cost of good sold, inventory turns would have been 3.1 days.

During fiscal 2010, changes in inventory reflect a $13.7 million reduction related to a non-cash provision for excess and 

obsolescence.

The following table sets forth (in thousands) changes to the components of our inventory from the end of fiscal 2009 

through the end of fiscal 2010:

Raw materials 

Work-in-process 

Finished goods 

Deferred cost of goods sold 

Gross inventory 

Provision for inventory excess and obsolescence 

Inventory 

prepaid expense and Other

october 31, 

2009 

$  19,694 

1,480 

61,026 

29,888 

112,088 

(24,002) 

$  88,086 

2010 

$  30,569 

6,993 

177,994 

76,830 

292,386 

(30,767) 

$261,619 

iNcrease
(decrease)

$  10,875

5,513

116,968

46,942

180,298

(6,765)

$173,533

Excluding the addition of $54.4 million of prepaid expense and other from the MEN Acquisition, cash used in opera-

tions related to prepaid expense and other during fiscal 2010 was $34.9 million. This usage was primarily related an 

increase in value added tax receivable.

Accounts payable, Accruals and Other Obligations

Excluding the addition of $36.5 million of accruals and other obligations upon completion of the MEN Acquisition, cash 

generated in operations related to accounts payable, accruals and other obligations during fiscal 2010 was $180.8 mil-

lion. Between fiscal 2009 and 2010, the change in unpaid equipment purchases was $3.8 million. Changes in accrued 

liabilities in the table below reflect non-cash provisions of $15.4 million related to warranties.

60

Ciena Corporation 10-K

 
 
 
 
The following table sets forth (in thousands) changes in our accounts payable, accruals and other obligations from the 

end of fiscal 2009 through the end of fiscal 2010:

Accounts payable 

Accrued liabilities 

Other long-term obligations 

Accounts payable, accruals and other obligations 

interest paid on Convertible notes

october 31, 

2009 

$  53,104 

105,160 

16,348 

$174,612 

2010 

$200,617 

193,994 

16,435 

$411,046 

iNcrease
(decrease)

$147,513

88,834

87

$236,434

Interest on our outstanding 0.25% convertible senior notes, due May 1, 2013, is payable on May 1 and November 1 of 

each year. We paid $0.4 million in interest on our 0.25% convertible notes during fiscal 2010.

Interest on our outstanding 4.0% convertible senior notes, due March 15, 2015, is payable on March 15 and September 15 

of each year. We paid $7.5 million in interest on our 4.0% convertible notes during fiscal 2010.

Interest on our outstanding 0.875% convertible senior notes, due June 15, 2017, is payable on June 15 and December 15 

of each year. We paid $4.3 million in interest on our 0.875% convertible notes during fiscal 2010.

Interest on our outstanding 3.75% convertible senior notes, due October 15, 2018, is payable on April 15 and October 15 

of each year. Our initial interest payment on these notes will be due on April 15, 2011.

For additional information about our convertible notes, see Note 15 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included 

in Item 8 of Part II of this report.

Deferred Revenue

Excluding the addition of $28.1 million of deferred revenue recorded upon completion of the MEN Acquisition, 

deferred revenue increased by $1.0 million during fiscal 2010. Product deferred revenue represents payments received 

in advance of shipment and payments received in advance of our ability to recognize revenue. Services deferred rev-

enue is related to payment for service contracts that will be recognized over the contract term. The following table 

reflects (in thousands) the balance of deferred revenue and the change in this balance from the end of fiscal 2009 

through the end of fiscal 2010:

Products 

Services 

Total deferred revenue 

october 31, 

2009 

$11,998 

63,935 

$75,933 

2010 

$  31,187 

73,862 

$105,049 

iNcrease
(decrease)

$19,189

9,927

$29,116

Ciena Corporation 10-K

61

 
 
 
 
Contractual Obligations

Significant changes to contractual obligations during fiscal 2010 relate to purchase obligations and operating leases, prin-

cipally for additional facilities, associated with the MEN Acquisition. Changes to interest and principal due on convertible 

notes relate to our private placement of convertible notes during fiscal 2010. For additional information about our convert-

ible notes, see Note 15 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this report. The following 

is a summary of our future minimum payments under contractual obligations as of October 31, 2010 (in thousands):

totaL 

Less tHaN 
oNe Year 

oNe to 

tHree to 
tHree Years  Five Years 

tHereaFter

Interest due on convertible notes 

$   204,747 

$  33,041 

$  66,081 

$  57,500 

$  48,125

Principal due at maturity on convertible notes 

1,441,210 

Operating leases(1) 

Purchase obligations(2) 

Transition service obligations(3) 

140,340 

283,688 

22,633 

— 

28,119 

283,688 

22,633 

216,210 

42,891 

— 

— 

375,000 

31,432 

— 

— 

850,000

37,898

—

—

Total(4) 

$2,092,618 

$367,481 

$325,182 

$463,932 

$936,023

(1)  Excludes the effect of the exercise of an early termination feature by the landlord for our Carling lease. See Item 2 of Part I of this report and Note 23 
to the Consolidated Financial Statemetns in Item 8 of Part II of this report. The amount for operating leases above does not include insurance, taxes, 
maintenance and other costs required by the applicable operating lease. These costs are variable and are not expected to have a material impact.
(2)  Purchase obligations relate to purchase order commitments to our contract manufacturers and component suppliers for inventory. In certain instances, 
we are permitted to cancel, reschedule or adjust these orders. Consequently, only a portion of the amount reported above relates to firm, non-
cancelable and unconditional obligations.

(3)  Transition service obligations represent the non-cancelable portion of fees under the transition service agreement. See “Overview—Integration 

Activities and Costs.”

(4)  As of October 31, 2010, we also had approximately $7.9 million of other long-term obligations in our condensed consolidated balance sheet for unrec-
ognized tax positions that are not included in this table because the timing or amount of any cash settlement with the respective tax authority cannot 
be reasonably estimated.

Some of our commercial commitments, including some of the future minimum payments set forth above, are secured 

by standby letters of credit. The following is a summary of our commercial commitments secured by standby letters of 

credit by commitment expiration date as of October 31, 2010 (in thousands):

Standby letters of credit 

totaL 

$47,943  

Less tHaN 
oNe Year 

$12,048  

oNe to 
tHree Years 

$35,308  

tHree to 
Five Years

$587

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not engage in any off-balance sheet financing arrangements. In particular, we do not have any equity interests in 

so-called limited purpose entities, which include special purpose entities (SPEs) and structured finance entities.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires that we make estimates and judgments that affect 

the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expense, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabili-

ties. By their nature, these estimates and judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. On an ongoing 

basis, we reevaluate our estimates, including those related to bad debts, inventories, investments, intangible assets, 

goodwill, income taxes, warranty obligations, restructuring, derivatives and hedging, and contingencies and litigation. 

We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable 

under the circumstances. Among other things, these estimates form the basis for judgments about the carrying values 

of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates 

under different assumptions or conditions. To the extent that there are material differences between our estimates and 

actual results, our consolidated financial statements will be affected.

We believe that the following critical accounting policies reflect those areas where significant judgments and estimates 

are used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

62

Ciena Corporation 10-K

 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. We consider revenue to be realized or realizable and 

earned	when	all	of	the	following	criteria	are	met:	persuasive	evidence	of	an	arrangement	exists;	delivery	has	occurred	

or	services	have	been	rendered;	the	price	to	the	buyer	is	fixed	or	determinable;	and	collectibility	is	reasonably	assured.	

Customer purchase agreements and customer purchase orders are generally used to determine the existence of an 

arrangement. Shipping documents and customer acceptance, when applicable, are used to verify delivery. We assess 

whether the price is fixed or determinable based on the payment terms associated with the transaction and whether the 

sales price is subject to refund or adjustment. We assess collectibility based primarily on the creditworthiness of the cus-

tomer as determined by credit checks and analysis, as well as the customer’s payment history. Revenue for maintenance 

services is generally deferred and recognized ratably over the period during which the services are to be performed.

We apply the percentage of completion method to long term arrangements where we are required to undertake signifi-

cant production customizations or modification engineering, and reasonable and reliable estimates of revenue and cost 

are available. Utilizing the percentage of completion method, we recognize revenue based on the ratio of actual costs 

incurred to date to total estimated costs expected to be incurred. In instances that do not meet the percentage of 

completion method criteria, and recognition of revenue is deferred until there are no uncertainties regarding customer 

acceptance. If circumstances arise that change the original estimates of revenue, costs, or extent of progress toward 

completion, revisions to the estimates are made. These revisions may result in increases or decreases in estimated rev-

enue or costs, and such revisions are reflected in income in the period in which the circumstances that gave rise to the 

revision become known by management.

Some of our communications networking equipment is integrated with software that is essential to the functionality 

of the equipment. Software revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has 

occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is probable. In instances where final acceptance of the prod-

uct is specified by the customer, revenue is deferred until there are no uncertainties regarding customer acceptance.

Arrangements with customers may include multiple deliverables, including any combination of equipment, services 

and software. If multiple element arrangements include software or software-related elements that are essential to 

the equipment, we allocate the arrangement fee to those separate units of accounting. Multiple element arrange-

ments that include software are separated into more than one unit of accounting if the functionality of the delivered 

element(s) is not dependent on the undelivered element(s), there is vendor-specific objective evidence of the fair value 

of the undelivered element(s), and general revenue recognition criteria related to the delivered element(s) have been 

met. The amount of product and services revenue recognized is affected by our judgments as to whether an arrange-

ment includes multiple elements and, if so, whether vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value exists. Changes 

to the elements in an arrangement and our ability to establish vendor-specific objective evidence for those elements 

could affect the timing of revenue recognition. For all other deliverables, we separate the elements into more than one 

unit of accounting if the delivered element(s) have value to the customer on a stand-alone basis, objective and reli-

able evidence of fair value exists for the undelivered element(s), and delivery of the undelivered element(s) is probable 

and substantially within our control. Revenue is allocated to each unit of accounting based on the relative fair value of 

each accounting unit or using the residual method if objective evidence of fair value does not exist for the delivered 

element(s). The revenue recognition criteria described above are applied to each separate unit of accounting. If these 

criteria are not met, revenue is deferred until the criteria are met or the last element has been delivered.

Our total deferred revenue for products was $12.0 million and $31.2 million as of October 31, 2009 and October 31, 

2010, respectively. Our services revenue is deferred and recognized ratably over the period during which the services 

are to be performed. Our total deferred revenue for services was $63.9 million and $73.9 million as of October 31, 2009 

and October 31, 2010, respectively.

Ciena Corporation 10-K

63

Business Combinations

We record acquisitions using the purchase method of accounting. All of the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, contrac-

tual contingencies and contingent consideration are recognized at their fair value as of the acquisition date. The excess 

of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the net tangible and net intangible assets acquired is recorded 

as goodwill. The application of the purchase method of accounting for business combinations requires management 

to make significant estimates and assumptions in the determination of the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities 

assumed in order to properly allocate purchase price consideration between assets that are depreciated and amortized 

from goodwill. These assumptions and estimates include a market participant’s use of the asset and the appropriate 

discount rates for a market participant. Our estimates are based on historical experience, information obtained from 

the management of the acquired companies and, when appropriate, includes assistance from independent third-party 

appraisal firms. Our significant assumptions and estimates can include, but are not limited to, the cash flows that an asset 

is expected to generate in the future, the appropriate weighted-average cost of capital, and the cost savings expected 

to be derived from acquiring an asset. These estimates are inherently uncertain and unpredictable. In addition, unan-

ticipated events and circumstances may occur which may affect the accuracy or validity of such estimates. During fiscal 

2010, we completed the MEN Acquisition for a purchase price of $676.8 million. As a result of the purchase price alloca-

tion to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as well as contingent consideration, there was no value assigned to 

goodwill. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this report.

Share-Based Compensation

We measure and recognize compensation expense for share-based awards based on estimated fair values on the date 

of grant. We estimate the fair value of each option-based award on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-

pricing model. This option pricing model requires that we make several estimates, including the option’s expected life 

and the price volatility of the underlying stock. The expected life of employee stock options represents the weighted-

average period the stock options are expected to remain outstanding. We calculate the expected term using detailed 

historical information about specific exercise behavior of our grantees. We considered the implied volatility and histori-

cal volatility of our stock price in determining our expected volatility, and, finding both to be equally reliable, deter-

mined that a combination of both measures would result in the best estimate of expected volatility. We recognize the 

estimated fair value of option-based awards, net of estimated forfeitures, as share-based compensation expense on a 

straight-line basis over the requisite service period.

We estimate the fair value of our restricted stock unit awards based on the fair value of our common stock on the date 

of	grant.	Our	outstanding	restricted	stock	unit	awards	are	subject	to	service-based	vesting	conditions	and/or	perfor-

mance-based vesting conditions. We recognize the estimated fair value of service-based awards, net of estimated 

forfeitures, as share-based expense ratably over the vesting period on a straight-line basis. Awards with performance-

based vesting conditions require the achievement of certain financial or other performance criteria or targets as a con-

dition to the vesting, or acceleration of vesting. We recognize the estimated fair value of performance-based awards, 

net of estimated forfeitures, as share-based expense over the performance period, using graded vesting, which con-

siders each performance period or tranche separately, based upon our determination of whether it is probable that 

the performance targets will be achieved. At each reporting period, we reassess the probability of achieving the per-

formance targets and the performance period required to meet those targets. Determining whether the performance 

targets will be achieved involves judgment, and the estimate of expense may be revised periodically based on changes 

in the probability of achieving the performance targets. Revisions are reflected in the period in which the estimate is 

changed. If any performance goals are not met, no compensation cost is ultimately recognized against that goal, and, 

to the extent previously recognized, compensation cost is reversed.

Because share-based compensation expense is based on awards that are ultimately expected to vest, the amount 

of expense takes into account estimated forfeitures. We estimate forfeitures at the time of grant and revise, if neces-

sary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Changes in these estimates and assump-

tions can materially affect the measure of estimated fair value of our share-based compensation. See Note 19 to our 

Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of Part II of this report for information regarding our assumptions related 

64

Ciena Corporation 10-K

to share-based compensation and the amount of share-based compensation expense we incurred for the periods cov-

ered in this report. As of October 31, 2010, total unrecognized compensation expense was $60.9 million: (i) $5.4 million, 

which	relates	to	unvested	stock	options	and	is	expected	to	be	recognized	over	a	weighted-average	period	of	0.9	year;	

and (ii) $55.5 million, which relates to unvested restricted stock units and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-

average period of 1.6 years.

We recognize windfall tax benefits associated with the exercise of stock options or release of restricted stock units 

directly to stockholders’ equity only when realized. A windfall tax benefit occurs when the actual tax benefit realized by 

us upon an employee’s disposition of a share-based award exceeds the deferred tax asset, if any, associated with the 

award that we had recorded. When assessing whether a tax benefit relating to share-based compensation has been 

realized, we follow the tax law “with-and-without” method. Under the with-and-without method, the windfall is consid-

ered realized and recognized for financial statement purposes only when an incremental benefit is provided after con-

sidering all other tax benefits including our net operating losses. The with-and-without method results in the windfall 

from share-based compensation awards always being effectively the last tax benefit to be considered. Consequently, 

the windfall attributable to share-based compensation will not be considered realized in instances where our net oper-

ating loss carryover (that is unrelated to windfalls) is sufficient to offset the current year’s taxable income before consid-

ering the effects of current-year windfalls.

Reserve for Inventory Obsolescence

We make estimates about future customer demand for our products when establishing the appropriate reserve for 

excess and obsolete inventory. We write down inventory that has become obsolete or unmarketable by an amount 

equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value based on assumptions about 

future demand and market conditions. Inventory write downs are a component of our product cost of goods sold. 

Upon recognition of the write down, a new lower cost basis for that inventory is established, and subsequent changes 

in facts and circumstances do not result in the restoration or increase in that newly established cost basis. We recorded 

charges for excess and obsolete inventory of $15.7 million and $13.7 million in fiscal 2009 and 2010, respectively. During 

fiscal 2009, these charges were primarily related to excess inventory due to a change in forecasted product sales. For 

fiscal 2010, these charges were primarily related to excess and obsolete inventory charges relating to product ratio-

nalization decisions in connection with the MEN Acquisition. In an effort to limit our exposure to delivery delays and 

to satisfy customer needs we purchase inventory based on forecasted sales across our product lines. In addition, part 

of our research and development strategy is to promote the convergence of similar features and functionalities across 

our product lines. Each of these practices exposes us to the risk that our customers will not order products for which 

we have forecasted sales, or will purchase less than we have forecasted. Historically, we have experienced write downs 

due to changes in strategic direction, discontinuance of a product and declines in market conditions. If actual market 

conditions worsen or differ from those we have assumed, if there is a sudden and significant decrease in demand for our 

products, or if there is a higher incidence of inventory obsolescence due to a rapid change in technology, we may be 

required to take additional inventory write-downs, and our gross margin could be adversely affected. Our inventory net 

of allowance for excess and obsolescence was $88.1 million and $261.6 million as of October 31, 2009 and October 31, 

2010, respectively.

Restructuring

As part of our restructuring costs, we provide for the estimated cost of the net lease expense for facilities that are no 

longer being used. The provision is equal to the fair value of the minimum future lease payments under our contracted 

lease obligations, offset by the fair value of the estimated sublease payments that we may receive. As of October 31, 

2010, our accrued restructuring liability related to net lease expense and other related charges was $6.4 million. The 

total minimum remaining lease payments for these restructured facilities are $9.0 million. These lease payments will be 

made over the remaining lives of our leases, which range from five months to eight years. If actual market conditions are 

different than those we have projected, we will be required to recognize additional restructuring costs or benefits asso-

ciated with these facilities.

Ciena Corporation 10-K

65

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Receivable

Our allowance for doubtful accounts receivable is based on management’s assessment, on a specific identification 

basis, of the collectibility of customer accounts. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and gener-

ally have not required collateral or other forms of security from customers. In determining the appropriate balance for 

our allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, management considers each individual customer account receivable in 

order to determine collectibility. In doing so, we consider creditworthiness, payment history, account activity and com-

munication with such customer. If a customer’s financial condition changes, or if actual defaults are higher than our his-

torical experience, we may be required to take a charge for an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable which could 

have an adverse impact on our results of operations. Our accounts receivable net of allowance for doubtful accounts 

was $118.3 million and $343.6 million as of October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2010, respectively. Our allowance for 

doubtful accounts as of October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2010 was $0.1 million.

Goodwill

Goodwill is the excess of the purchase price over the fair values assigned to the net assets acquired in a business com-

bination. Goodwill is assigned to the reporting units that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the combina-

tion. We test goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, which we have determined to be the last business day of fiscal 

September each year. We also test goodwill for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances 

change that would, more likely than not, reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying value. Prior to the 

reorganization of our operations described in “Overview” above, we tested goodwill for impairment as a single report-

ing unit. See “Interim Impairment Assessment—Fiscal 2009” below.

The first step in the process of assessing goodwill impairment is to compare the fair value of the reporting unit with the 

unit’s carrying amount, including goodwill. If this test indicates that the fair value is less than the carrying value, then step 

two is required to compare the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of the report-

ing unit’s goodwill. A non-cash goodwill impairment charge would have the effect of decreasing our earnings or increas-

ing our losses in such period. If we are required to take a substantial impairment charge, our operating results would be 

materially adversely affected in such period. As of the end of fiscal 2009 and 2010, our goodwill balance was $0.

interim impairment Assessment—Fiscal 2009

Based on a combination of factors, including the then current macroeconomic conditions, a sustained decline in our 

common stock price and market capitalization below our net book value, we conducted an interim impairment assess-

ment of goodwill during the second quarter of fiscal 2009. We determined the fair value of our then single reporting 

unit to be equal to our market capitalization plus a control premium. Market capitalization was determined by multiply-

ing the shares outstanding on the assessment date by the average market price of our common stock over a 10-day 

period before and a 10-day period after each assessment date. We used this 20-day duration to consider inherent mar-

ket fluctuations that may have affected any individual closing price. We believed that our market capitalization alone did 

not fully capture the fair value of our business as a whole, or the substantial value that an acquirer would obtain from its 

ability to obtain control of our business. As such, in determining fair value, we added a control premium—which seeks 

to give effect to the increased consideration a potential acquirer would be required to pay in order to gain sufficient 

ownership to set policies, direct operations and make decisions related to our company—to our market capitalization.

When we performed the step one fair value comparison during the second quarter of fiscal 2009, our market capitaliza-

tion was $721.8 million and our carrying value, including goodwill, was $949.0 million. We applied a 25% control pre-

mium to market capitalization to determine a fair value of $902.2 million. Because step one indicated that the fair value 

was less than our carrying value, we performed the step two analysis. Under the step two analysis, the implied fair value 

of goodwill requires valuation of a reporting unit’s tangible and intangible assets and liabilities in a manner similar to 

the allocation of purchase price in a business combination. If the carrying value of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds 

its implied fair value, goodwill is deemed impaired and is written down to the extent of the difference. The implied fair 

value of the reporting unit’s goodwill was determined to be $0, and, as a result, we recorded a goodwill impairment of 

$455.7 million in fiscal 2009, representing the full carrying value of the goodwill.

66

Ciena Corporation 10-K

Long-Lived Assets

Our	long-lived	assets	include:	equipment,	furniture	and	fixtures;	finite-lived	intangible	assets;	indefinite-lived	intangible	

assets;	and	maintenance	spares.	As	of	October	31,	2009	and	2010	these	assets	totaled	$154.7	million	and	$600.4	million,	

net, respectively. We test long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that 

the assets’ carrying amount is not recoverable from its undiscounted cash flows. Our long-lived assets are assigned to 

asset groups which represents the lowest level for which we identify cash flows.

Deferred Tax Valuation Allowance

As of October 31, 2010, we have recorded a valuation allowance offsetting essentially all our net deferred tax assets of 

$1.4 billion. When measuring the need for a valuation allowance, we assess both positive and negative evidence regard-

ing the realizability of these deferred tax assets. We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to 

the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. In determining net deferred tax assets and valuation allowances, 

management is required to make judgments and estimates related to projections of profitability, the timing and extent 

of the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards, applicable tax rates, transfer pricing methodologies and tax plan-

ning strategies. The valuation allowance is reviewed quarterly and is maintained until sufficient positive evidence exists 

to support a reversal. Because evidence such as our operating results during the most recent three-year period is 

afforded more weight than forecasted results for future periods, our cumulative loss during this three-year period rep-

resents sufficient negative evidence regarding the need for nearly a full valuation allowance. We will release this valua-

tion allowance when management determines that it is more likely than not that our deferred tax assets will be realized. 

Any future release of valuation allowance may be recorded as a tax benefit increasing net income or as an adjustment to 

paid-in capital, based on tax ordering requirements.

Uncertain Tax Positions

We account for uncertainty in income tax positions using a two-step approach. The first step is to evaluate the tax posi-

tion for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the 

position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second 

step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement. 

Significant judgment is required in evaluating our uncertain tax positions and determining our provision for income 

taxes. Although we believe our reserves are reasonable, no assurance can be given that the final tax outcome of these 

matters will not be different from that which is reflected in our historical income tax provisions and accruals. We adjust 

these reserves in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the closing of a tax audit or the refinement of an 

estimate. To the extent that the final tax outcome of these matters is different than the amounts recorded, such differ-

ences will affect the provision for income taxes in the period in which such determination is made. As of October 31, 

2010, we had $0.9 million and $7.9 million recorded as current and long-term obligations, respectively, related to uncer-

tain tax positions. The provision for income taxes includes the effect of reserve provisions and changes to reserves that 

are considered appropriate, as well as the related net interest.

The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits increased by $1.4 million during fiscal 2010 to $8.8 million, which includes 

$1.4 million of interest and some minor penalties. On March 19, 2010, as a result of the acquisition of the MEN Business, 

Ciena recorded a liability and an indemnification asset of $2.6 million related to the uncertain income tax positions of 

the MEN Business. During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, subsequent to the acquisition, this acquired liability and 

associated indemnification asset were reduced by $2.0 million due to a lapse in applicable statute of limitations.

Warranty

Our liability for product warranties, included in other accrued liabilities, was $40.2 million and $54.4 million as of 

October 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively. Our products are generally covered by a hardware warranty for periods rang-

ing from one to five years and a software warranty of 90 days or one year, depending upon the product. We accrue for 

warranty costs as part of our cost of goods sold based on associated material costs, technical support labor costs, and 

associated overhead. Material cost is estimated based primarily upon historical trends in the volume of product returns 

within the warranty period and the cost to repair or replace the equipment. Technical support labor cost is estimated 

Ciena Corporation 10-K

67

based primarily upon historical trends and the cost to support the customer cases within the warranty period. The pro-

vision for product warranties was $19.3 million and $15.4 million for fiscal 2009 and 2010, respectively. The provision for 

warranty claims may fluctuate on a quarterly basis depending upon the mix of products and customers in that period. 

If actual product failure rates, material replacement costs, service or labor costs differ from our estimates, revisions to 

the estimated warranty provision would be required. An increase in warranty claims or the related costs associated with 

satisfying these warranty obligations could increase our cost of sales and negatively affect our gross margin.

Loss Contingencies

We are subject to the possibility of various losses arising in the ordinary course of business. These may relate to disputes, 

litigation and other legal actions. We consider the likelihood of loss or the incurrence of a liability, as well as our ability 

to reasonably estimate the amount of loss, in determining loss contingencies. A loss is accrued when it is probable that 

a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. We regularly evaluate current informa-

tion available to us to determine whether any accruals should be adjusted and whether new accruals are required.

Effects of Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of Part II of this report for information relating to our dis-

cussion of the effects of recent accounting pronouncements.

68

Ciena Corporation 10-K

Unaudited Quarterly Results of Operations

The tables below (in thousands, except per share data) set forth the operating results in our consolidated statements 

of operations for each of the eight quarters in the period ended October 31, 2010 and reflect the impact of our 

March 19, 2010 acquisition of the MEN Business. This information is unaudited, but in our opinion reflects all adjust-

ments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) that we consider necessary for a fair statement of such infor-

mation in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. There were no material, retroactive measure-

ment period adjustments related to the MEN Acquisition. The results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of 

results for any future period.

Revenue:

Products 

Services 

Total Revenue 

Cost of goods sold:

Products 

Services 

Total costs of goods sold 

Gross profit 

Operating expenses:

Research and development 

Selling and marketing 

General and administrative 

Acquisition and integration costs 

— 

Amortization of intangible assets 

6,404 

Restructuring costs 

Goodwill impairment 

Change in fair value of  
  contingent consideration 

76 

— 

— 

JaN. 31,  
2009 

aPr. 30,  
2009 

JuL. 31,   oct. 31,  

JaN. 31,   aPr. 30,  

JuL. 31,   oct. 31,  

2009 

2009 

2010 

2010 

2010 

2010

$139,717 

$ 118,849 

$139,903 

$149,053 

$149,054 

$206,420 

$ 312,378 

$341,387

27,683 

25,352 

24,855 

27,217 

26,822 

47,051 

77,297 

76,227

167,400 

144,201 

164,758 

176,270 

175,876 

253,471 

389,675 

417,614

76,367 

19,190 

95,557 

71,843 

46,700 

33,819 

11,585 

65,419 

18,062 

83,481 

60,720 

49,482 

33,295 

12,615 

— 

6,224 

6,399 

455,673 

— 

72,842 

17,251 

90,093 

74,665 

44,442 

31,468 

11,524 

— 

6,224 

3,941 

— 

— 

81,542 

17,126 

98,668 

77,602 

49,695 

35,945 

11,785 

— 

5,974 

791 

— 

— 

76,669 

118,221 

201,559 

200,255

19,047 

30,308 

44,107 

48,969

95,716 

148,529 

245,666 

249,224

80,160 

104,942 

144,009 

168,390

50,033 

34,237 

12,763 

27,031 

5,981 

(21) 

— 

— 

71,142 

45,328 

21,503 

39,221 

17,121 

1,849 

— 

— 

100,869 

105,582

52,127 

32,649 

17,033 

38,727 

2,157 

— 

61,823

35,777

18,094

37,572

4,529

—

— 

(13,807)

Total operating expenses 

98,584 

563,688 

97,599 

104,190 

130,024 

196,164 

243,562 

249,570

Loss from operations 

Interest and other  

income (loss), net 

Gain on extinguishment of debt 

Interest expense 

Loss on cost method investments 

(26,741) 

(502,968) 

(22,934) 

(26,588) 

(49,864) 

(91,222) 

(99,553) 

(81,180)

4,660 

— 

(1,844) 

(565) 

3,508 

— 

(1,852) 

(2,570) 

999 

— 

(1,856) 

(2,193) 

320 

— 

(773) 

— 

3,748 

(2,668) 

— 

— 

3,610

4,948

(1,854) 

(1,828) 

(4,113) 

(5,990) 

(6,688)

— 

— 

— 

— 

—

Loss before income taxes 

(24,490) 

(503,882) 

(25,984) 

(28,122) 

(52,465) 

(91,587) 

(108,211) 

(79,310)

Provision (benefit) for income tax 

341 

(672) 

470 

(1,463) 

868 

(1,578) 

1,644 

1,007

Net loss 

$ (24,831) 

$(503,210) 

$ (26,454) 

$ (26,659) 

$ (53,333) 

$ (90,009) 

$(109,855) 

$ (80,317)

Basic net loss per common share 

$ 

 (0.27) 

$ 

  (5.53) 

$ 

 (0.29) 

$ 

 (0.29) 

$ 

 (0.58) 

$ 

 (0.97) 

$ 

  (1.18) 

$  

(0.86)

Diluted net loss per potential  
  common share 

Weighted average basic common  
  shares outstanding 

Weighted average dilutive potential  
  common shares outstanding 

$ 

 (0.27) 

$ 

  (5.53) 

$ 

 (0.29) 

$ 

 (0.29) 

$ 

 (0.58) 

$ 

 (0.97) 

$ 

  (1.18) 

$  

(0.86)

90,620 

90,932 

91,364 

91,758 

92,321 

92,614 

92,906 

93,197

90,620 

90,932 

91,364 

91,758 

92,321 

92,614 

92,906 

93,197

Ciena Corporation 10-K

69

 
 
 
ITem 7a.   quanTITaTIVe anD qualITaTIVe DIsClosuRes  

abouT maRKeT RIsK

The following discussion about our market risk disclosures involves forward-looking statements. Actual results could 

differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. We are exposed to market risk related to 

changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates.

InTereST raTe SenSITIVITy. As of October 31, 2010 we no longer hold any marketable debt securities. Accordingly, 

if market interest rates were to increase immediately and uniformly by 10 percentage points from current levels, the fair 

value of the portfolio would not be affected.

foreIgn CurrenCy exChange rISk. As a global concern, our business and results of operations are exposed to 

adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates. Historically, our sales have primarily been denominated in U.S. 

dollars and the impact of foreign currency fluctuations on revenue has not been material. As a result of our increased 

global presence, in large part resulting from the MEN Acquisition, a larger percentage of our revenue is non-U.S. dol-

lar denominated, in particular, with sales denominated in Canadian Dollars and Euros. As a result, if the U.S. dollar 

strengthens against these currencies, our revenues could be adversely affected. For our U.S. dollar denominated sales, 

an increase in the value of the U.S. dollar would increase the real cost to our customers of our products in markets out-

side the United States.

With regard to operating expense, our primary exposure to foreign currency exchange risk relates to operating expense 

incurred in Canadian Dollars, British Pounds, Euros and Indian Rupees. During fiscal 2010, approximately 32% of our 

operating expense was non-U.S. dollar denominated. If these currencies strengthen, costs reported in U.S. dollars will 

increase, which would adversely affect our operating expense.

To reduce variability in non-U.S. dollar denominated operating expense, we have previously entered into foreign cur-

rency forward contracts and may do so in the future. In the past, these derivatives have been designated as cash flow 

hedges. We do not enter into foreign exchange forward or option contracts for trading purposes. As of October 31, 

2010, we did not have any foreign currency forward contracts outstanding.

For fiscal 2010, research and development expense was negatively affected by approximately $13.9 million due to unfa-

vorable foreign exchange rates related to the weakening of the U.S. dollar in relation to the Canadian Dollar, partially 

offset by the favorable impact of a stronger U.S. dollar in relation to the Euro. Sales and marketing expense benefited 

by $1.6 million due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar in relation to the Euro.

As of October 31, 2010, the assets and liabilities of our entities that are denominated in currencies other than the enti-

ty’s functional currency were primarily related to intercompany payables and receivables. We may experience gains or 

losses from the revaluation of these foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities. The net gain (loss) on foreign 

currency revaluation during fiscal 2010 was immaterial.

ConVerTIble debT ouTSTandIng. The fair market value of each of our outstanding issues of convertible notes is 

subject to interest rate and market price risk due to the convertible feature of the notes and other factors. Generally the 

fair market value of fixed interest rate debt will increase as interest rates fall and decrease as interest rates rise. The fair 

market value of the notes may also increase as the market price of our stock rises and decrease as the market price of 

the stock falls. Interest rate and market value changes affect the fair market value of the notes, and may affect the prices 

at which we would be able repurchase such notes were we to do so. These changes do not impact our financial posi-

tion, cash flows or results of operations. During fiscal 2010, we repurchased $81.8 million in aggregate principal amount 

of our outstanding 0.25% convertible senior notes due 2013 in privately negotiated transactions for cash payments of 

$76.1 million. During fiscal 2009, we repurchased $2.0 million in aggregate principal amount of our outstanding 0.25% 

convertible senior notes due May 1, 2013 in open market transactions for $1.0 million. For additional information on the 

fair value of our outstanding notes, see Note 15 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II 

of this report.

70

Ciena Corporation 10-K

ITem 8.   FInanCIal sTaTemenTs anD suPPlemenTaRy DaTa
The following is an index to the consolidated financial statements:

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

Consolidated Balance Sheets 

Consolidated Statements of Operations 

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 

Page Number

74

75

76

77

78

79

Ciena Corporation 10-K

71

 
RePoRT oF InDePenDenT RegIsTeReD PublIC aCCounTIng FIRm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Ciena Corporation

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, 

the financial position of Ciena Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) at October 31, 2010 and 2009, and the 

results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2010 in con-

formity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company 

maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2010, based on cri-

teria established in internal Control—integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the 

Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining 

effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial 

reporting, included in the Report of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting under Item 9A. Our respon-

sibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial report-

ing based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company 

Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reason-

able assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal con-

trol over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examin-

ing, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting 

principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presen-

tation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over 

financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating 

effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as 

we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions. As 

discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for 

business combinations in fiscal 2010.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the 

reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with gener-

ally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and proce-

dures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions 

and	dispositions	of	the	assets	of	the	company;	(ii)	provide	reasonable	assurance	that	transactions	are	recorded	as	necessary	

to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts 

and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of 

the	company;	and	(iii)	provide	reasonable	assurance	regarding	prevention	or	timely	detection	of	unauthorized	acquisition,	

use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, 

projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate 

because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

As described in the Report of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting under Item 9A, management 

has excluded the MEN Business from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2010 

because it was acquired by the Company in a purchase business combination during fiscal 2010. We have also excluded 

the MEN Business from our audit of internal control over financial reporting. The MEN Business is included in the con-

solidated results on which we are reporting and its total assets and total revenues represent 20% and 43%, respectively, 

of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended October 31, 2010.

/s/	PricewaterhouseCoopers	LLP

Baltimore, Maryland

December 22, 2010

72

Ciena Corporation 10-K

ConsolIDaTeD balanCe sheeTs

(in ThOusAnDs, exCepT shARe DATA) 

ASSETS

Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents 

Short-term investments 

Accounts receivable, net 

Inventories 

Prepaid expenses and other 

Total current assets 

Long-term investments 

Equipment, furniture and fixtures, net 

Other intangible assets, net 

Other long-term assets 

Total assets 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Current liabilities:

Accounts payable 

Accrued liabilities 

Deferred revenue 

Total current liabilities 

Long-term deferred revenue 

Other long-term obligations 

Convertible notes payable 

Total liabilities 

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders’ equity:

Preferred	stock—par	value	$0.01;	20,000,000	shares	authorized;	 
  zero shares issued and outstanding 

Common	stock—par	value	$0.01;	290,000,000	shares	authorized;	 
  92,038,360 and 94,060,300 shares issued and outstanding 

Additional paid-in capital 

Accumulated other comprehensive income 

Accumulated deficit 

Total stockholders’ equity 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

october 31,

2009 

2010

$  485,705 

$  688,687

563,183 

118,251 

88,086 

50,537 

—

343,582

261,619

147,680

1,305,762 

1,441,568

8,031 

61,868 

60,820 

67,902 

—

120,294

426,412

129,819

$ 1,504,383 

$ 2,118,093

$ 

  53,104 

$  200,617

105,160 

40,565 

198,829 

35,368 

16,348 

798,000 

1,048,545 

193,994

75,334

469,945

29,715

16,435

1,442,705

1,958,800

— 

920 

—

941

5,665,028 

5,702,137

1,223 

1,062

(5,211,333) 

(5,544,847)

455,838 

159,293

$ 1,504,383 

$ 2,118,093

Ciena Corporation 10-K

73

 
ConsolIDaTeD sTaTemenTs oF oPeRaTIons

(in ThOusAnDs, exCepT peR shARe DATA) 

Revenue:

Products 

Services 

Total revenue 

Cost of goods sold:

Products 

Services 

Total cost of goods sold 

Gross profit  

Operating expenses:

Research and development  

Selling and marketing  

General and administrative  

Acquisition and integration costs 

Amortization of intangible assets 

Restructuring costs 

Goodwill impairment 

Change in fair value of contingent consideration 

Total operating expenses 

Income (loss) from operations 

Interest and other income, net 

Interest expense 

Realized loss due to impairment of marketable debt investments 

Loss on cost method investments 

Gain on extinguishment of debt 

Income (loss) before income taxes 

Provision (benefit) for income taxes 

Net income (loss 

Basic net income (loss) per common share  

Diluted net income (loss) per potential common share 

Weighted average basic common shares outstanding 

Weighted average dilutive potential common shares outstanding 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Year eNded october 31,

2008 

2009 

2010

$791,415 

$ 547,522 

$ 1,009,239

111,033 

902,448 

371,238 

80,283 

451,521 

450,927 

175,023 

152,018 

68,639 

— 

32,264 

1,110 

— 

— 

429,054 

21,873 

36,762 

(12,927) 

(5,101) 

— 

932 

41,539 

2,645 

105,107 

652,629 

296,170 

71,629 

367,799 

284,830 

190,319 

134,527 

47,509 

— 

24,826 

11,207 

455,673 

— 

864,061 

(579,231) 

9,487 

(7,406) 

— 

(5,328) 

— 

(582,478) 

(1,324) 

  227,397

 1,236,636

  596,704

  142,431

  739,135

  497,501

  327,626

  193,515

  102,692

  101,379

99,401

8,514

—

(13,807)

  819,320

(321,819)

3,917

(18,619)

—

—

4,948

(331,573)

1,941

$  38,894 

$(581,154) 

$  (333,514)

$ 

$ 

  0.44 

  0.42 

89,146 

110,605 

$ 

$ 

  (6.37) 

  (6.37) 

91,167 

91,167 

$ 

$ 

(3.58)

(3.58)

93,103

93,103

74

Ciena Corporation 10-K

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ConsolIDaTeD sTaTemenTs oF Changes In sToCKholDeRs’ equITy

(in ThOusAnDs, exCepT shARe DATA) 

commoN 
stock 
sHares 

Par 
vaLue 

additioNaL 

accumuLated 
accum- 
otHer 
Paid-iN  comPreHeNsive  uLated 
deFicit 
iNcome 
caPitaL 

totaL 
stock- 
HoLders’ 
equitY

Balance at October 31, 2007 

86,752,069 

$868 

$5,519,741 

$(1,243) 

$(4,669,212) 

$ 850,154

Cummulative effect of adopting FIN 48 

Net income 

Changes in unrealized gains  
  on investments, net 

Translation adjustment 

Comprehensive income 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

Exercise of stock options, net 

1,253,350 

Tax benefit from employee  
  stock option plans 

Share-based compensation expense 

Issuance of common stock for  
  acquisitions, net of issuance costs 

Balance at October 31, 2008 

Net loss 

Changes in unrealized gains  
  on investments, net 

Translation adjustment 

Comprehensive loss 

— 

— 

2,465,384 

90,470,803 

— 

— 

— 

— 

Exercise of stock options, net 

Share-based compensation expense 

Balance at October 31, 2009 

1,567,557 

— 

92,038,360 

Net loss 

Changes in unrealized loss  
  on investments, net 

Translation adjustment 

Comprehensive loss 

Exercise of stock options, net 

Share-based compensation expense 

— 

— 

— 

— 

2,021,940 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

12 

— 

— 

25 

905 

— 

— 

— 

— 

15 

— 

920 

— 

— 

— 

— 

21 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

5,764 

318 

31,428 

72,247 

— 

— 

(1,479) 

1,447 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

139 

38,894 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

5,629,498 

(1,275) 

(4,630,179) 

139

38,894

(1,479)

1,447

38,862

5,776

318

31,428

72,272

998,949

— 

— 

— 

— 

1,092 

34,438 

5,665,028 

— 

— 

— 

— 

1,549 

35,560 

— 

(581,154) 

(581,154)

1,404 

1,094 

— 

— 

— 

1,223 

— 

(458) 

297 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

(5,211,333) 

(333,514) 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

1,404

1,094

(578,656)

1,107

34,438

455,838

(333,514)

(458)

297

(333,675)

1,570

35,560

Balance at October 31, 2010 

94,060,300 

$941 

$5,702,137 

$ 1,062 

$(5,544,847) 

$ 159,293

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Ciena Corporation 10-K

75

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ConsolIDaTeD sTaTemenTs oF Cash FloWs

(in ThOusAnDs) 

Cash flows from operating activities:

Net income (loss 
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided  
  by (used in) operating activities:
Gain on extinguishment of debt 
Amortization of premium (discount) on marketable debt securities 
Realized loss due to impairment of marketable debt investments 
Loss on cost method investments 
Change in fair value of embedded redemption feature 
Change in fair value of contingent consideration 
Depreciation of equipment, furniture and fixtures, and  
  amortization of leasehold improvements 
Impairment of goodwill 
Share-based compensation costs 
Amortization of intangible assets 
Deferred tax provision 
Provision for inventory excess and obsolescence 
Provision for warranty 
Other 
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisition:

Accounts receivable 
Inventories 
Prepaid expenses and other 
Accounts payable, accruals and other obligations 
Deferred revenue 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 

Cash flows from investing activities:

Payments for equipment, furniture, fixtures and intellectual property 
Restricted cash 
Purchase of available for sale securities 
Proceeds from maturities of available for sale securities 
Proceeds from sales of available for sale securities 
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 

Cash flows from financing activities:

Proceeds from issuance of senior convertible notes payable 
Repayment of senior convertible notes payable 
Debt issuance costs 
Repayment of indebtedness of acquired business 
Excess tax benefit from employee stock option plans 
Proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 

supplemental disclosure of cash flow information

Cash paid during the period for interest 
Cash paid during the period for income taxes, net 

Non-cash investing and financing activities

Purchase of equipment in accounts payable 
Value of common stock issued in acquisition 
Fair value of vested options assumed in acquisition 
Debt issuance costs in accrued liabilities 

Year eNded october 31,

2008 

2009 

2010

$   38,894 

$   (581,154) 

$(333,514)

(932) 
(2,878) 
5,101 
— 
— 
— 

18,599 
— 
31,428 
37,956 
1,640 
18,325 
15,336 
5,243 

(32,471) 
3,713 
1,649 
(31,600) 
7,616 

117,619 

(29,998) 
1,340 
(571,511) 
901,433 
— 
(210,016) 

91,248 

— 
(543,296) 
— 
(12,363) 
318 
5,776 

(549,565) 

(694) 
(341,392) 
892,061 

— 
(907) 
— 
5,328 
— 
— 

21,933 
455,673 
34,438 
31,429 
(883) 
15,719 
19,286 
2,044 

20,097 
(10,353) 
(9,678) 
2,943 
1,506 

7,421 

(24,114) 
(4,116) 
(1,214,218) 
645,119 
523,137 
— 

(74,192) 

— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
1,107 

1,107 

700 
(64,964) 
550,669 

(4,948)
574
—
—
(2,510)
(13,807)

42,789
—
35,560
127,018
700
13,696
15,353
2,296

(218,196)
(40,957)
(34,908)
180,814
1,030

(229,010)

(51,207)
(24,521)
(63,591)
454,141
179,531
(693,247)

(198,894)

725,000
(76,065)
(20,301)
—
—
1,570

630,204

682
202,982
485,705

$ 550,669 

$  485,705 

$ 688,687

$   15,339 
 3,120 
$ 

$ 
 2,316 
$   62,360 
 9,912 
$ 
   — 
$ 

$ 
$ 

$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 

  4,748 
   584 

  1,481 
  — 
  — 
  — 

$   12,248
 1,705
$ 

$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 

 5,259
   —
   —
  206

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

76

Ciena Corporation 10-K

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
noTes To ConsolIDaTeD FInanCIal sTaTemenTs

(1)   CIena CoRPoRaTIon anD sIgnIFICanT aCCounTIng PolICIes anD esTImaTes

Description of Business

Ciena Corporation (“Ciena” or the “Company”) is a provider of communications networking equipment, software and 

services that support the transport, switching, aggregation and management of voice, video and data traffic. Ciena’s 

Packet-Optical Transport, Packet-Optical Switching and Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery products are used, individu-

ally or as part of an integrated solution, in networks operated by communications service providers, cable operators, 

governments and enterprises around the globe. Ciena is a network specialist targeting the transition of disparate, 

legacy communications networks to converged, next-generation architectures, better able to handle increased traffic 

and deliver more efficiently a broader mix of high-bandwidth communications services. Ciena’s products, along with its 

embedded, network element software and unified service and transport management, enable service providers to effi-

ciently and cost-effectively deliver critical enterprise and consumer-oriented communication services. Ciena’s principal 

executive offices are located at 1201 Winterson Road, Linthicum, Maryland 21090.

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Ciena and its wholly owned subsidiaries. 

All material inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Acquisition of MEN Business (“MEN Acquisition”)

On March 19, 2010, Ciena completed its acquisition of substantially all of the optical and carrier Ethernet assets of 

Nortel’s Metro Ethernet Networks Business (the “MEN Business”). Additional details regarding this transaction are set 

forth in Note 2 below.

Business Combinations

During fiscal 2010, Ciena adopted the new FASB guidance on business combinations which requires the total purchase 

price to be allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. The fair values 

assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based on valuations using management’s best estimates 

and assumptions. The allocation of the purchase price as reflected in the consolidated financial statements is based on 

the best information available to management at the time the consolidated financial statements are issued. During the 

measurement period, not to exceed one year, Ciena is required to retrospectively adjust the initial measurement alloca-

tion if new information is obtained about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date that, if known, 

would have resulted in the recognition of those assets or liabilities as of that date. Ciena’s measurement period ended 

October 31, 2010 as related to the MEN Acquisition.

Fiscal Year

Ciena has a 52 or 53 week fiscal year, which ends on the Saturday nearest to the last day of October in each year 

(November 1, 2008, October 31, 2009 and October 30, 2010 for the periods reported). For purposes of financial state-

ment presentation, each fiscal year is described as having ended on October 31.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles gener-

ally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the amounts 

reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Estimates are used for purchase account-

ing, bad debts, valuation of inventories and investments, recoverability of intangible assets, other long-lived assets and 

goodwill, income taxes, warranty obligations, restructuring liabilities, derivatives, contingencies and litigation. Ciena 

bases its estimates on historical experience and assumptions that it believes are reasonable. Actual results may differ 

materially from management’s estimates.

Ciena Corporation 10-K

77

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Ciena considers all highly liquid investments purchased with original maturities of three months or less to be cash 

equivalents. Restricted cash collateralizing letters of credit are included in other current assets and other long-term 

assets depending upon the duration of the restriction.

Investments

Ciena’s investments are classified as available-for-sale and are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses 

recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. Ciena recognizes losses when it determines that declines in the 

fair value of its investments, below their cost basis, are other-than-temporary. In determining whether a decline in fair 

value is other-than-temporary, Ciena considers various factors including market price (when available), investment rat-

ings, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the investee, the length of time and the extent to which the fair 

value has been less than Ciena’s cost basis, and its intent and ability to hold the investment until maturity or for a period 

of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value. Ciena considers all marketable debt securities 

that it expects to convert to cash within one year or less to be short-term investments. All others are considered long-

term investments.

Ciena has certain minority equity investments in privately held technology companies that are classified as other assets. 

These investments are carried at cost because Ciena owns less than 20% of the voting equity and does not have the 

ability to exercise significant influence over these companies. These investments involve a high degree of risk as the 

markets for the technologies or products manufactured by these companies are usually early stage at the time of 

Ciena’s investment and such markets may never be significant. Ciena could lose its entire investment in some or all of 

these companies. Ciena monitors these investments for impairment and makes appropriate reductions in carrying val-

ues when necessary.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost computed using standard cost, which approximates 

actual cost, on a first-in, first-out basis. Ciena records a provision for excess and obsolete inventory when an impairment 

has been identified.

Goodwill

Goodwill is the excess of the purchase price over the fair values assigned to the net assets acquired in a business com-

bination. Goodwill is assigned to the reporting units that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the combina-

tion. Ciena has determined that its operating segments and reporting units for goodwill assignment are the same. This 

determination is based on the fact that components below Ciena’s operating segment level, such as individual product 

or service offerings, do not constitute a reporting unit because they do not constitute a business for which discrete 

financial information is available.

Ciena tests each reporting unit’s goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, which Ciena has determined to be the 

last business day of its fiscal September each year. Testing is required between annual tests if events occur or circum-

stances change that would, more likely than not, reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying value. 

Prior to the reorganization of Ciena’s operations described above, Ciena tested its goodwill for impairment as a single 

reporting unit.

Long-lived Assets

Ciena’s	long-lived	assets	include:	equipment,	furniture	and	fixtures;	intangible	assets;	and	maintenance	spares.	Ciena	

tests long-lived assets for impairment whenever triggering events or changes in circumstances indicate that the assets’ 

carrying amount is not recoverable from its undiscounted cash flows. An impairment loss is measured as the amount by 

which the carrying amount of the asset or asset group exceeds its fair value. Ciena’s long-lived assets are assigned to 

asset groups which represent the lowest level for which cash flows can be identified.

78

Ciena Corporation 10-K

Equipment, Furniture and Fixtures

Equipment, furniture and fixtures are recorded at cost. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-

line method over useful lives of two years to five years for equipment, furniture and fixtures and the shorter of useful life 

or lease term for leasehold improvements.

Qualifying internal use software and website development costs incurred during the application development stage 

that consist primarily of outside services and purchased software license costs, are capitalized and amortized straight-

line over the estimated useful lives of two years to five years.

Intangible Assets

Ciena has recorded finite-lived intangible assets as a result of several acquisitions. Finite-lived intangible assets are carried 

at cost less accumulated amortization. Amortization is computed using the straight-line method over the expected eco-

nomic lives of the respective assets, from nine months to seven years, which approximates the use of intangible assets.

Maintenance Spares

Maintenance spares are recorded at cost. Spares usage cost is expensed ratably over four years.

Concentrations

Substantially all of Ciena’s cash and cash equivalents and short-term and long-term investments in marketable debt secu-

rities are maintained at two major U.S. financial institutions. The majority of Ciena’s cash equivalents consist of money 

market funds. Deposits held with banks may exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits. Generally, 

these deposits may be redeemed upon demand and, therefore, management believes that they bear minimal risk.

Historically, a large percentage of Ciena’s revenue has been the result of sales to a small number of communications 

service providers. Consolidation among Ciena’s customers has increased this concentration. Consequently, Ciena’s 

accounts receivable are concentrated among these customers. See Notes 8 and 20 below.

Additionally, Ciena’s access to certain materials or components is dependent upon sole or limited source suppliers. The 

inability of any supplier to fulfill Ciena’s supply requirements could affect future results. Ciena relies on a small number 

of contract manufacturers to perform the majority of the manufacturing for its products. If Ciena cannot effectively 

manage these manufacturers and forecast future demand, or if they fail to deliver products or components on time, 

Ciena’s business and results of operations may suffer.

Revenue Recognition

Ciena	recognizes	revenue	when	all	of	the	following	criteria	are	met:	persuasive	evidence	of	an	arrangement	exists;	

delivery	has	occurred	or	services	have	been	rendered;	the	price	to	the	buyer	is	fixed	or	determinable;	and	collectibility	

is reasonably assured. Customer purchase agreements and customer purchase orders are generally used to determine 

the existence of an arrangement. Shipping documents and evidence of customer acceptance, when applicable, are 

used to verify delivery. Ciena assesses whether the price is fixed or determinable based on the payment terms associ-

ated with the transaction and whether the sales price is subject to refund or adjustment. Ciena assesses collectibility 

based primarily on the creditworthiness of the customer as determined by credit checks and analysis, as well as the 

customer’s payment history. Revenue for maintenance services is generally deferred and recognized ratably over the 

period during which the services are to be performed.

Ciena applies the percentage of completion method to long-term arrangements where it is required to undertake 

significant production, customizations or modification engineering, and reasonable and reliable estimates of revenue 

and cost are available. Utilizing the percentage of completion method, Ciena recognizes revenue based on the ratio of 

actual costs incurred to date to total estimated costs expected to be incurred. In instances that do not meet the per-

centage of completion method criteria, recognition of revenue is deferred until there are no uncertainties regarding 

customer acceptance.

Ciena Corporation 10-K

79

Some of Ciena’s communications networking equipment is integrated with software that is essential to the functional-

ity of the equipment. Software revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has 

occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is probable. In instances where final acceptance of the prod-

uct is specified by the customer, revenue is deferred until there are no uncertainties regarding customer acceptance.

Arrangements with customers may include multiple deliverables, including any combination of equipment, services 

and software. If multiple element arrangements include software or software-related elements that are essential to the 

equipment, Ciena allocates the arrangement fee to be allocated to those separate units of accounting. Multiple ele-

ment arrangements that include software are separated into more than one unit of accounting if the functionality of 

the delivered element(s) is not dependent on the undelivered element(s), there is vendor-specific objective evidence of 

the fair value of the undelivered element(s), and general revenue recognition criteria related to the delivered element(s) 

have been met. The amount of product and services revenue recognized is affected by Ciena’s judgments as to whether 

an arrangement includes multiple elements and, if so, whether vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value exists. 

Changes to the elements in an arrangement and Ciena’s ability to establish vendor-specific objective evidence for those 

elements could affect the timing of revenue recognition. For all other deliverables, Ciena separates the elements into 

more than one unit of accounting if the delivered element(s) have value to the customer on a stand-alone basis, objec-

tive and reliable evidence of fair value exists for the undelivered element(s), and delivery of the undelivered element(s) 

is probable and substantially in Ciena’s control. Revenue is allocated to each unit of accounting based on the relative 

fair value of each accounting unit or using the residual method if objective evidence of fair value does not exist for the 

delivered element(s). The revenue recognition criteria described above are applied to each separate unit of accounting. 

If these criteria are not met, revenue is deferred until the criteria are met or the last element has been delivered.

Warranty Accruals

Ciena provides for the estimated costs to fulfill customer warranty obligations upon the recognition of the related 

revenue. Estimated warranty costs include estimates for material costs, technical support labor costs and associated 

overhead. The warranty liability is included in cost of goods sold and determined based upon actual warranty cost 

experience, estimates of component failure rates and management’s industry experience. Ciena’s sales contracts do 

not permit the right of return of product by the customer after the product has been accepted.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, Ciena recorded an adjustment to reduce its warranty liability and cost of goods 

sold by $3.3 million, to correct an overstatement of warranty expenses related to prior periods. The adjustment related 

to an error in the methodology of computing the annual failure rate used to calculate the warranty accrual. There was 

no tax impact as a result of this adjustment. Ciena believes this adjustment is not material to its financial statements for 

prior annual or interim periods, or the annual results for fiscal 2010.

Accounts Receivable, Net

Ciena’s allowance for doubtful accounts is based on its assessment, on a specific identification basis, of the collectibility 

of customer accounts. Ciena performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and generally has not required col-

lateral or other forms of security from its customers. In determining the appropriate balance for Ciena’s allowance for 

doubtful accounts, management considers each individual customer account receivable in order to determine collect-

ibility. In doing so, management considers creditworthiness, payment history, account activity and communication with 

such customer. If a customer’s financial condition changes, Ciena may be required to record an allowance for doubtful 

accounts, which would negatively affect its results of operations.

Research and Development

Ciena charges all research and development costs to expense as incurred. Types of expense incurred in research and devel-

opment include employee compensation, prototype, consulting, depreciation, facility costs and information technologies.

Advertising Costs

Ciena expenses all advertising costs as incurred.

80

Ciena Corporation 10-K

Legal Costs

Ciena expenses legal costs associated with litigation defense as incurred.

Share-Based Compensation Expense

Ciena measures and recognizes compensation expense for share-based awards based on estimated fair values on the 

date of grant. Ciena estimates the fair value of each option-based award on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes 

option-pricing model. This model is affected by Ciena’s stock price as well as estimates regarding a number of variables 

including expected stock price volatility over the expected term of the award and projected employee stock option 

exercise behaviors. Ciena estimates the fair value of each share-based award based on the fair value of the underlying 

common stock on the date of grant. In each case, Ciena only recognizes expense to its consolidated statement of oper-

ations for those options or shares that are expected ultimately to vest. Ciena uses two attribution methods to record 

expense, the straight-line method for grants with service-based vesting and the graded-vesting method, which consid-

ers each performance period or tranche separately, for all other awards. See Note 19 below.

Income Taxes

Ciena accounts for income taxes using an asset and liability approach that recognizes deferred tax assets and liabili-

ties for the expected future tax consequences attributable to differences between the carrying amounts of assets and 

liabilities for financial reporting purposes and their respective tax bases, and for operating loss and tax credit carryfor-

wards. In estimating future tax consequences, Ciena considers all expected future events other than the enactment of 

changes in tax laws or rates. Valuation allowances are provided, if, based upon the weight of the available evidence, it is 

more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

Ciena adopted the accounting guidance on uncertainty related to income tax positions at the beginning of fiscal 2008. 

Ciena classifies interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax expense. All of 

the uncertain tax positions, if recognized, would decrease the effective income tax rate.

In the ordinary course of business, transactions occur for which the ultimate outcome may be uncertain. In addition, tax 

authorities periodically audit Ciena’s income tax returns. These audits examine significant tax filing positions, includ-

ing the timing and amounts of deductions and the allocation of income tax expenses among tax jurisdictions. Ciena 

is currently under audit in India for 2007. Management does not expect the outcome of this audit to have a material 

adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, result of operations or cash flows. Ciena’s major tax 

jurisdictions and the earliest open tax years are as follows: United States (2007), United Kingdom (2004), Canada (2005) 

and India (2007). However, limited adjustments can be made to Federal tax returns in earlier years in order to reduce net 

operating loss carryforwards.

Ciena has not provided U.S. deferred income taxes on the cumulative unremitted earnings of its non-U.S. affiliates as it 

plans to permanently reinvest cumulative unremitted foreign earnings outside the U.S. and it is not practicable to determine 

the unrecognized deferred income taxes. These cumulative unremitted foreign earnings relate to ongoing operations in 

foreign jurisdictions and are required to fund foreign operations, capital expenditures, and any expansion requirements.

Ciena recognizes windfall tax benefits associated with the exercise of stock options or release of restricted stock units 

directly to stockholders’ equity only when realized. A windfall tax benefit occurs when the actual tax benefit realized by 

Ciena upon an employee’s disposition of a share-based award exceeds the deferred tax asset, if any, associated with 

the award that Ciena had recorded. When assessing whether a tax benefit relating to share-based compensation has 

been realized, Ciena follows the tax law “with-and-without” method. Under the with-and-without method, the windfall 

is considered realized and recognized for financial statement purposes only when an incremental benefit is provided 

after considering all other tax benefits including Ciena’s net operating losses. The with-and-without method results 

in the windfall from share-based compensation awards always being effectively the last tax benefit to be considered. 

Consequently, the windfall attributable to share-based compensation will not be considered realized in instances 

where Ciena’s net operating loss carryover (that is unrelated to windfalls) is sufficient to offset the current year’s taxable 

income before considering the effects of current-year windfalls.

Ciena Corporation 10-K

81

Loss Contingencies

Ciena is subject to the possibility of various losses arising in the ordinary course of business. These may relate to dis-

putes, litigation and other legal actions. Ciena considers the likelihood of loss or the incurrence of a liability, as well 

as Ciena’s ability to reasonably estimate the amount of loss, in determining loss contingencies. An estimated loss 

contingency is accrued when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably 

estimated. Ciena regularly evaluates current information available to it to determine whether any accruals should be 

adjusted and whether new accruals are required.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying value of Ciena’s cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities, 

approximates fair market value due to the relatively short period of time to maturity. The fair value of investments in 

marketable debt securities is determined using quoted market prices for those securities or similar financial instru-

ments. For information related to the fair value of Ciena’s convertible notes, see Note 7 below.

Fair value for the measurement of financial assets and liabilities is defined as the price that would be received to sell 

an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. 

As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market par-

ticipants would use in pricing an asset or liability. Ciena utilizes a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs for fair 

value measurement. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels as follows:

•	 Level	1	inputs	are	unadjusted	quoted	prices	in	active	markets	for	identical	assets	or	liabilities;

•	 Level	2	inputs	are	quoted	prices	for	identical	or	similar	assets	or	liabilities	in	less	active	markets	or	model-derived	

valuations in which significant inputs are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through 

market	corroboration,	for	substantially	the	full	term	of	the	financial	instrument;

•	 Level	3	inputs	are	unobservable	inputs	based	on	Ciena’s	assumptions	used	to	measure	assets	and	liabilities	at 	

fair value.

By distinguishing between inputs that are observable in the marketplace, and therefore more objective, and those that 

are unobservable and therefore more subjective, the hierarchy is designed to indicate the relative reliability of the fair 

value measurements. A financial asset or liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest 

level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Restructuring

From time to time, Ciena takes actions to align its workforce, facilities and operating costs with perceived market 

opportunities and business conditions. Ciena implements these restructuring plans and incurs the associated liability 

concurrently. Generally accepted accounting principles require that a liability for the cost associated with an exit or 

disposal activity be recognized in the period in which the liability is incurred, except for one-time employee termination 

benefits related to a service period of more than 60 days, which are accrued over the service period. See Note 3 below.

Foreign Currency

Some of Ciena’s foreign branch offices and subsidiaries use the U.S. dollar as their functional currency, because Ciena, 

as the U.S. parent entity, exclusively funds the operations of these branch offices and subsidiaries. For those subsidiar-

ies using the local currency as their functional currency, assets and liabilities are translated at exchange rates in effect 

at the balance sheet date, and the statement of operations is translated at a monthly average rate. Resulting transla-

tion adjustments are recorded directly to a separate component of stockholders’ equity. Where the monetary assets 

and liabilities are transacted in a currency other than the entity’s functional currency, re-measurement adjustments are 

recorded in other income. The net gain (loss) on foreign currency re-measurement and exchange rate changes is imma-

terial for separate financial statement presentation.

82

Ciena Corporation 10-K

Derivatives

Ciena’s 4.0% convertible senior notes include a redemption feature that is accounted for as a separate embedded 

derivative. The embedded redemption feature is recorded at fair value on a recurring basis and these changes are 

included in interest and other income, net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Occasionally, Ciena uses foreign currency forward contracts to hedge certain forecasted foreign currency transactions 

relating to operating expenses. Historically these derivatives, designated as cash flow hedges, had maturities of less 

than one year and permitted net settlement.

At the inception of the cash flow hedge and on an ongoing basis, Ciena assesses the hedging relationship to deter-

mine its effectiveness in offsetting changes in cash flows attributable to the hedged risk during the hedge period. The 

effective portion of the hedging instrument’s net gain or loss is initially reported as a component of accumulated other 

comprehensive income (loss), and upon occurrence of the forecasted transaction, is subsequently reclassified into the 

operating expense line item to which the hedged transaction relates. Any net gain or loss associated with the ineffec-

tiveness of the hedging instrument is reported in interest and other income, net. See Note 14 below.

Computation of Basic Net Income (Loss) per Common Share and  

Diluted Net Income (Loss) per Dilutive Potential Common Share

Ciena calculates basic earnings per share (EPS) by dividing earnings attributable to common stock by the weighted-

average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS includes other potential dilutive common 

stock that would occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common 

stock. Ciena uses a dual presentation of basic and diluted EPS on the face of its income statement. A reconciliation of 

the numerator and denominator used for the basic and diluted EPS computations is set forth in Note 16.

Software Development Costs

Ciena develops software for sale to its customers. Generally accepted accounting principles require the capitalization 

of certain software development costs that are incurred subsequent to the date technological feasibility is established 

and prior to the date the product is generally available for sale. The capitalized cost is then amortized straight-line 

over the estimated life of the product. Ciena defines technological feasibility as being attained at the time a working 

model is completed. To date, the period between Ciena achieving technological feasibility and the general availability 

of such software has been short, and software development costs qualifying for capitalization have been insignificant. 

Accordingly, Ciena has not capitalized any software development costs.

Segment Reporting

Effective upon the March 19, 2010 completion of the acquisition of the MEN Business, Ciena reorganized its internal 

organizational structure and the management of its business. Ciena’s chief operating decision maker, its chief execu-

tive officer, evaluates performance and allocates resources based on multiple factors, including segment profit (loss) 

information	for	the	following	product	categories:	(i)	Packet-Optical	Transport;	(ii)	Packet-Optical	Switching;	(iii)	Carrier	

Ethernet	Service	Delivery;	and	(iv)	Software	and	Services.	Operating	segments	are	defined	as	components	of	an	

enterprise:	that	engage	in	business	activities	which	may	earn	revenue	and	incur	expense;	for	which	discrete	financial	

information	is	available;	and	for	which	such	information	is	evaluated	regularly	by	the	chief	operating	decision	maker	for	

purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance. Ciena considers the four product categories above to be 

its operating segments for reporting purposes. See Note 20.

Newly Issued Accounting Standards

In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, (FASB) amended the accounting standards for revenue 

recognition with multiple deliverables. The amended guidance allows the use of management’s best estimate of sell-

ing price for individual elements of an arrangement when vendor-specific objective evidence or third-party evidence 

is unavailable. Additionally, it eliminates the residual method of revenue recognition in accounting for multiple deliver-

able arrangements. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010 and early adoption is 

Ciena Corporation 10-K

83

permitted. Ciena will adopt this standard prospectively during its first quarter of fiscal 2011. As a result, Ciena will dis-

close comparative revenue, for fiscal 2010, as if adoption had occurred on the first day of fiscal 2010. Comparative data 

Ciena is currently evaluating the impact this new guidance could have on its financial condition, results of operations 

and cash flows.

In October 2009, the FASB amended the accounting standards for revenue arrangements with software elements. The 

amended guidance modifies the scope of the software revenue recognition guidance to exclude tangible products that 

contain both software and non-software components that function together to deliver the product’s essential function-

ality. The pronouncement is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010 and early adoption is permit-

ted. This guidance must be adopted in the same period an entity adopts the amended revenue arrangements with 

multiple deliverables guidance described above. Ciena will adopt this standard prospectively during its first quarter of 

fiscal 2011. As a result, Ciena will disclose comparative revenue, for fiscal 2010, as if adoption had occurred on the first 

day of fiscal 2010. Comparative data Ciena is currently evaluating the impact this new guidance could have on its finan-

cial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

(2)  busIness CombInaTIons

Acquisition of MEN Business

On March 19, 2010, Ciena completed its acquisition of the MEN Business. On March 19, 2010, Ciena completed its 

acquisition of the MEN Business. Ciena acquired the MEN Business in an effort to strengthen its position as technol-

ogy leader in next-generation, converged optical Ethernet networking, accelerate the execution of its corporate and 

research and development strategies and enable Ciena to better compete with larger equipment vendors. The acquisi-

tion expands Ciena’s geographic reach, customer relationships, and portfolio of network solutions.

In accordance with the agreements for the acquisition, the $773.8 million aggregate purchase price was subsequently 

adjusted downward by $80.6 million based upon the amount of net working capital transferred to Ciena at closing. See 

Note 15 below for information related to Ciena’s election to pay the entire aggregate purchase price in cash. As a result, 

Ciena paid $693.2 million in cash for the purchase of the MEN Business.

In connection with the acquisition, Ciena entered into an agreement with Nortel to lease the “Lab 10” building on 

Nortel’s Carling Campus in Ottawa, Canada (the “Carling lease”) for a term of ten years. The lease agreement con-

tained a provision that allowed Nortel to reduce the term of the lease, and in exchange, Ciena could receive a payment 

of up to $33.5 million. This amount was placed into escrow by Nortel in accordance with the acquisition agreements. 

The fair value of this contingent refund right of $16.4 million was recorded as a reduction to the consideration paid, 

resulting in a purchase price of $676.8 million.

On October 19, 2010, Nortel issued a public announcement that it had entered into a sale agreement of its Carling 

campus with Publics Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC). According to the announcement, the sale, 

targeted to close at the end of the calendar year 2010, is subject to customary closing conditions as well as approval of 

certain governmental authorities and of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. With respect to the Carling lease, Nortel 

has been directed by PWGSC to exercise, on closing, its early termination rights under the Carling lease, shortening the 

lease term from ten years to five years. Pursuant to the lease, this will result in the refund to Ciena of $33.5 million from 

the escrowed cash consideration paid. As a result of this change in circumstances and expected outcome probability, 

during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 Ciena recorded an unrealized gain of $13.8.million resulting in a fair value of 

$30.2 million for the contingent consideration right. See Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of 

Part II of this annual report.

Given the structure of the transaction as an asset carve-out from Nortel, this transaction has resulted in a costly and 

complex integration. As of October 31, 2010, Ciena has incurred $101.4 million in transaction, consulting and third party 

service fees, $8.5 million in severance expense, and an additional $12.4 million, primarily related to purchases of capital-

ized information technology equipment. In addition to the estimated costs above, Ciena has also incurred significant 

84

Ciena Corporation 10-K

transition services expense as it relies upon an affiliate of Nortel to perform certain critical operational and business 

support functions during an interim integration period. Ciena can utilize certain of these support services for a period 

of up to 24 months following the acquisition of the MEN Business, 12 months in Europe, Middle East and Africa, (EMEA). 

The cost of these transition services is estimated to be up to approximately $94 million annually. The actual expense 

will depend upon the scope of the services that Ciena utilizes and the time within which Ciena is able to complete the 

planned transfer of these services to internal resources or other third party providers.

The following table summarizes the final allocation related to the MEN Business based on the estimated fair value of the 

acquired assets and assumed liabilities (in thousands):

Unbilled receivables 

Inventories 

Prepaid expenses and other 

Other long-term assets 

Equipment, furniture and fixtures 

Developed technology 

In-process research and development 

Customer relationships, outstanding purchase orders and contracts 

Trade name 

Deferred revenue 

Accrued liabilities  

Other long-term obligations 

Total purchase price allocation 

FiNaL aLLocatioN

$  7,136

146,272

32,517

21,924

41,213

218,774

11,000

260,592

2,000

(28,086)

(33,845)

(2,644)

$676,853

Adjustments to the preliminary purchase price allocation have been made to reflect revised estimates of the fair values 

of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at March 19, 2010. These adjustments resulted in a net decrease to good-

will of $40.0 million through October 31, 2010, the end of the measurement period. The most significant adjustments 

were associated with increases in valuations of inventories of $32.1 million and deferred revenue of $9.3 million. The val-

uations of inventories and deferred revenue primarily related to in-transit shipments of orders that existed at the acqui-

sition date. Providing for these adjustments in previous periods would have had an immaterial impact on the reported 

operating results for the quarterly periods ended April 30, 2010 and July 31, 2010.

Unbilled receivables represent unbilled claims for which Ciena will invoice customers upon its completion of the 

acquired projects.

Under the acquisition method of accounting, Ciena revalued the acquired finished goods inventory to fair value, which 

was determined to be most appropriately recognized as the estimated selling price less the sum of (a) costs of disposal, 

and (b) a reasonable profit allowance for Ciena’s selling effort.

Prepaid expenses and other include product demonstration units used to support research and development projects 

and indemnification assets related to uncertain tax contingencies acquired and recorded as part of other long-term 

obligations. Other long-term assets represent spares used to support customer maintenance commitments.

Developed technology represents purchased technology that had reached technological feasibility and for which 

development had been completed as of the date of the acquisition. Developed technology will be amortized on a 

straight line basis over its estimated useful lives of two to seven years.

In-process research and development represents development projects that had not reached technological feasibility 

at the time of the acquisition. In-process research and development assets will be impaired, if abandoned, or amortized 

in future periods, depending upon the ability of Ciena to use the research and development in future periods. Future 

expenditures to complete the in-process research and development projects will be expensed as incurred.

Ciena Corporation 10-K

85

 
Customer relationships, outstanding purchase orders and contracts represent agreements with existing customers of 

the MEN Business. These intangible assets are expected to have estimated useful lives of nine months to seven years, 

with the exception of $14.2 million related to a contract asset for acquired in-process projects to be billed by Ciena and 

recognized as a reduction in revenue. As of October 31, 2010, Ciena has billed $10.2 million of these contract assets. 

The remaining $4.0 million will be billed during the first half of fiscal 2011. Trade name represents acquired product 

trade names that are expected to have a useful life of nine months.

Deferred revenue represents obligations assumed by Ciena to provide maintenance support services for which pay-

ment for such services was already made to Nortel.

Accrued liabilities represent assumed warranty obligations, other customer contract obligations, and certain employee 

benefit plans. Other long-term obligations represent uncertain tax contingencies.

The following unaudited pro forma financial information summarizes the results of operations for the periods indicated 

as if Ciena’s acquisition of the MEN Business had been completed as of the beginning of each of the periods pre-

sented. Revenue specific to the MEN Business since the March 19, 2010 acquisition date was $530.9 million. As Ciena 

has begun to integrate the combined operations, eliminating overlapping processes and expenses and integrating its 

products and sales efforts with those of the acquired MEN Business, it is impractical to determine the earnings specific 

to the MEN Business since the acquisition date.

These pro forma amounts (in thousands) do not purport to be indicative of the results that would have actually been 

obtained if the acquisition occurred as of the beginning of the periods presented or that may be obtained in the future.

Pro forma revenue 

Pro forma net loss 

Acquisition of World Wide Packets

FiscaL Year

2009 

2010

$ 1,704,037 

$1,592,911

$(1,008,894) 

$  (536,253)

On March 3, 2008, Ciena acquired World Wide Packets, Inc. (“World Wide Packets” or “WWP”) pursuant to the terms of 

an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated January 22, 2008 (the “Merger Agreement”) by and among Ciena, World Wide 

Packets, Wolverine Acquisition Subsidiary, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Ciena (“Merger Sub”), and Daniel Reiner, 

as stockholders’ representative. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, on March 3, 2008, Merger Sub was merged with 

and into World Wide Packets, with World Wide Packets continuing as the surviving corporation and a wholly owned 

subsidiary of Ciena. World Wide Packets is a supplier of communications networking equipment that enables the cost-

effective delivery of a wide variety of carrier Ethernet-based services. Prior to the acquisition, World Wide Packets was a 

privately held company. Ciena’s results of operations for fiscal 2008 in these financial statements include the operations 

of World Wide Packets beginning on March 3, 2008, the effective date of the acquisition.

Upon the closing of the acquisition, all of the outstanding shares of World Wide Packets’ common stock and preferred 

stock were exchanged for approximately 2.5 million shares of Ciena common stock and approximately $196.7 million 

in cash. Of this amount, $20.0 million in cash and 340,000 shares of Ciena common stock were placed into escrow for 

a period of one year as security for the indemnification obligations of World Wide Packets’ stockholders under the 

Merger Agreement. Upon the closing, Ciena also assumed all then outstanding World Wide Packets options and 

exchanged them for options to acquire approximately 0.9 million shares of Ciena common stock. Under the Merger 

Agreement, Ciena also agreed to indemnify certain officers and directors of World Wide Packets against third-party 

claims arising out of their employment relationship. Ciena has determined the fair value of this indemnification obliga-

tion to be insignificant.

86

Ciena Corporation 10-K

 
 
The following table summarizes the purchase price for the acquisition (in thousands):

Cash 

Acquisition-related costs 

Value of common stock issued 

Fair value of vested options assumed 

Total purchase price 

amouNt 

$196,668 

14,183 

62,360 

9,912 

$283,123

The value of Ciena’s common stock issued in the acquisition was based on the average closing price of Ciena’s common 

stock for the two trading days prior to, the date of, and the two trading days after the announcement of the acquisition. 

The fair value of the vested options assumed was determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.

The acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting, which requires the total purchase price to 

be allocated to the acquired assets and assumed liabilities based on their estimated fair values. The amount of the pur-

chase price in excess of the amounts assigned to acquired tangible or intangible assets and assumed liabilities is recog-

nized as goodwill. Amounts allocated to goodwill are not tax deductible. As set forth below, Ciena recorded acquired, 

finite-lived intangible assets related to developed technology, covenants not to compete, and customer relationships, 

outstanding purchase orders and contracts. The following table summarizes the allocation of the acquisition purchase 

price based on the estimated fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities (in thousands):

Cash 

Accounts receivable 

Inventory 

Equipment, furniture and fixtures 

Other tangible assets 

Developed technology 

Covenants not to compete 

Customer relationships, outstanding purchase orders and contracts 

Goodwill 

Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and deferred revenue 

Promissory notes and loans payable 

Total purchase price allocation 

amouNt 

$ 

   835

2,049

12,872

2,691

2,003

42,400

3,200

19,100

223,658

(13,322)

(12,363)

$283,123

Under purchase accounting rules, Ciena valued the acquired finished goods inventory to fair value, which is defined as 

the estimated selling price less the sum of (a) costs of disposal, and (b) a reasonable profit allowance for Ciena’s sell-

ing effort. This valuation resulted in an increase in inventory carrying value of approximately $5.3 million for marketable 

inventory, slightly offset by a decrease of $0.7 million for unmarketable inventory.

Developed technology represents purchased technology that had reached technological feasibility and for which World 

Wide Packets had substantially completed development as of the date of acquisition. Fair value was determined using 

future discounted cash flows related to the projected income stream of the developed technology for a discrete projec-

tion period. Cash flows were discounted to their present value as of the closing date. Developed technology is amor-

tized on a straight line basis over its estimated useful lives of 4 years to 6 years.

Covenants not to compete represent agreements entered into with key employees of World Wide Packets. Covenants 

not to compete are amortized on a straight line basis over estimated useful lives of 3.5 years.

Customer relationships, outstanding purchase orders and contracts represent agreements with existing World Wide 

Packets’ customers and have estimated useful lives of 4 months to 6 years.

Ciena Corporation 10-K

87

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The following unaudited pro forma financial information summarizes the results of operations for the periods indicated 

as if Ciena’s acquisition of World Wide Packets had been completed as of the beginning of each of the periods pre-

sented. These pro forma amounts (in thousands, except per share data) do not purport to be indicative of the results 

that would have actually been obtained if the acquisition occurred as of the beginning of the periods presented or that 

may be obtained in the future.

Pro forma revenue 

Pro forma net income 

(3)  ResTRuCTuRIng CosTs

Year eNded  
october 31, 2008

$909,098

$  22,179

In April 2010, Ciena committed to certain restructuring actions and subsequently effected a headcount reduction prin-

cipally affecting Ciena’s global product group and global field organization outside of the EMEA region. In May 2010, 

following the end of its fiscal second quarter, Ciena informed employees of its proposal to reorganize and restructure 

portions of Ciena’s business and operations in the EMEA region, including a headcount reduction principally affecting 

employees in Ciena’s global field and supply chain organizations.

The following table displays the activity and balances of the historical restructuring liability accounts for the fiscal years 

indicated (in thousands):

Balance at October 31, 2007 

Additional liability recorded 

Cash payments 

Balance at October 31, 2008 

Additional liability recorded 

Adjustment to previous estimates 

Cash payments 

Balance at October 31, 2009 

Additional liability recorded 

Adjustment to previous estimates 

Cash payments 

Balance at October 31, 2010 

Current restructuring liabilities 

Non-current restructuring liabilities 

workForce 
reductioN 

coNsoLidatioN oF 
excess FaciLities 

$ 

  — 

1,057(a) 

(75) 

982 

4,117(b) 

— 

(4,929) 

170 

9,256(c) 

— 

(7,850) 

$ 1,576 

$ 1,576 

$ 

  — 

$ 4,688 

53(a) 

(1,498) 

3,243 

3,419(b) 

3,670(b) 

(897) 

9,435 

—(c) 

(742)(c) 

(2,301) 

$ 6,392 

$ 1,208 

$ 5,184 

totaL

$   4,688 

1,110 

(1,573)

4,225 

7,536 

3,670 

(5,826)

9,605 

9,256 

(742)

(10,151)

$   7,968 

$   2,784 

$   5,184

(a)  During fiscal 2008, Ciena recorded a charge of $1.0 million related to a workforce reduction of 56 employees and a charge of approximately $0.1 mil-

lion related to the closure of a facility located in San Antonio, Texas.

(b)  During fiscal 2009, Ciena recorded a charge of $4.1 million of severance and other employee-related costs associated with a workforce reduction of 

200 employees, $3.4 million related to the Acton, MA facility closure and $3.7 million related to previously restructured facilities.

(c)  During fiscal 2010, Ciena recorded a charge of $2.1 million related to a workforce reduction of approximately 70 employees, principally affect-

ing Ciena’s global product group and global field organization outside of the EMEA region and $7.1 million related to a workforce reduction 
of 82 employees associated with the restructuring activities in the EMEA region described above and an adjustment of $0.7 million associated 
with previously restructured facilities.

(4)  gooDWIll

As of October 31, 2009 and 2010, Ciena did not have any goodwill on its Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Impairment loss—fiscal 2009

Prior to the acquisition of the MEN Business, Ciena assessed its goodwill based upon a single reporting unit and tested 

its single reporting unit’s goodwill for impairment annually on the last business day of fiscal September each year. 

Testing is required between annual tests if events occur or circumstances change that would, more likely than not, 

88

Ciena Corporation 10-K

 
 
 
 
reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying value. Based on a combination of factors, including macro-

economic conditions and a sustained decline in Ciena’s common stock price and market capitalization below net book 

value, Ciena conducted an interim impairment assessment of goodwill during the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Ciena 

performed the step one fair value comparison, and its market capitalization was $721.8 million and its carrying value, 

including goodwill, was $949.0 million. Ciena applied a 25% control premium to its market capitalization to determine 

a fair value of $902.2 million. Because step one indicated that Ciena’s fair value was less than its carrying value, Ciena 

performed the step two analysis. Under the step two analysis, the implied fair value of goodwill requires valuation of 

a reporting unit’s tangible and intangible assets and liabilities in a manner similar to the allocation of purchase price 

in a business combination. If the carrying value of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, goodwill 

is deemed impaired and is written down to the extent of the difference. The implied fair value of the reporting unit’s 

goodwill was determined to be $0, and, as a result, Ciena recorded a goodwill impairment of $455.7 million, represent-

ing the full carrying value of the goodwill.

Ciena performed assessments of the fair value of its single reporting unit as of September 27, 2008. Ciena compared 

its fair value on each assessment date to its carrying value, including goodwill, and determined that the carrying value, 

including goodwill, did not exceed fair value. Because the carrying amount was less than its fair value, no impairment 

loss was recorded.

(5)  long-lIVeD asseT ImPaIRmenTs

Due to the reorganization described in Note 1 above, Ciena performed an impairment analysis of its long-lived assets 

during the second quarter of fiscal 2010. Based on Ciena’s estimate of future, undiscounted cash flows by asset group, 

no impairment was required.

Due to effects of difficult macroeconomic conditions on Ciena’s business, including lengthening sales cycles and slow-

ing deployments resulting in lower demand, Ciena performed an impairment analysis of its long-lived assets during the 

fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 and the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Based on Ciena’s estimate of future, undiscounted 

cash flows by asset group as of October 31, 2008 and April 30, 2009, respectively, no impairment was required.

(6)  maRKeTable DebT seCuRITIes

As of October 31, 2010, Ciena had no investments in marketable debt securities. As of October 31, 2009, short-term and 

long-term investments in marketable debt securities are comprised of the following (in thousands):

US government obligations 

Publicly traded equity securities 

Included in short-term investments 

Included in long-term investments 

amortized 
cost 

$570,505 

251 

$570,756 

562,781 

7,975 

$570,756 

october 31, 2009

gross 
uNreaLized 
gaiNs 

gross 
uNreaLized 
Losses 

$460 

— 

$460 

404 

56 

$460 

$  2 

— 

$  2 

2 

— 

$  2 

estimated  
Fair vaLue

$570,963

251

$571,214

563,183

8,031

$571,214

Gross unrealized losses related to marketable debt investments, included in short-term investments at October 31, 2009, 

were immaterial. During fiscal 2008, Ciena recognized losses of $5.1 million related to two structured investment vehicles 

(SIVs) that entered into receivership during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 and failed to make payment at maturity.

Ciena Corporation 10-K

89

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(7)  FaIR Value measuRemenTs

As of the dates indicated, the following table summarizes the fair value of assets that are recorded at fair value on a 

recurring basis (in thousands):

Assets:

Embedded redemption feature 

Contingent consideration 

Total assets measured at fair value 

Assets:

US government obligations 

Publicly traded equity securities 

Total assets measured at fair value 

LeveL 1 

LeveL 2 

LeveL 3 

totaL 

october 31, 2010

$  — 

— 

$  — 

$ 

$ 

 — 

— 

 — 

$  4,220 

30,195 

$34,415 

$  4,220 

30,195 

$  34,415 

LeveL 1 

LeveL 2 

LeveL 3 

totaL 

october 31, 2009

$  — 

251 

$251 

$570,963 

— 

$570,963 

$ 

   — 

— 

$ 

   — 

$570,963 

251 

$571,214 

As of the dates indicated, the assets and liabilities above were presented on Ciena’s Consolidated Balance Sheet as fol-

lows (in thousands):

LeveL 1 

LeveL 2 

LeveL 3 

totaL 

october 31, 2010

Assets:

Prepaid expenses and other 

Other long-term assets 

Total assets measured at fair value 

$  — 

— 

$  — 

$ 

$ 

 — 

— 

 — 

$30,195 

4,220 

$34,415 

october 31, 2009

$  30,195 

4,220

$  34,415 

Assets:

Short-term investments 

Long-term investments 

Total assets measured at fair value 

LeveL 1 

LeveL 2 

LeveL 3 

totaL 

$251 

— 

$251 

$562,932 

8,031 

$570,963 

$ 

   — 

— 

$ 

   — 

$563,183

8,031

$571,214 

Ciena’s Level 1 assets include corporate equity securities publicly traded on major exchanges that are valued using 

quoted prices in active markets.

Ciena’s Level 2 investments include U.S. government obligations. These investments are valued using observable inputs 

such	as	quoted	market	prices,	benchmark	yields,	reported	trades,	broker/dealer	quotes	or	alternative	pricing	sources	

with reasonable levels of price transparency. Investments are held by a custodian who obtains investment prices from a 

third party pricing provider that uses standard inputs to models which vary by asset class.

Ciena’s Level 3 assets included in prepaid expenses and other reflect its contingent right to receive a refund of up 

to $33.5 million in aggregate purchase price paid in the MEN Acquisition. The fair value was based on the weighted 

average probabilities of expected cash flows discounted to its present value. Ciena’s Level 3 assets included in other 

long-term assets reflect the embedded redemption feature contained within Ciena’s 4.0% convertible senior notes. 

See Note 15 below. The embedded redemption feature is bifurcated from Ciena’s 4.0% convertible senior notes using 

the “with-and-without” approach. As such, the total value of the embedded redemption feature is calculated as the 

difference between the value of the 4.0% convertible senior notes (the “Hybrid Instrument”) and the value of an iden-

tical instrument without the embedded redemption feature (the “Host Instrument”). Both the Host Instrument and 

the Hybrid Instrument are valued using a modified binomial model. The modified binomial model utilizes a risk free 

90

Ciena Corporation 10-K

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
interest rate, an implied volatility of Ciena’s stock, the recovery rates of bonds and the implied default intensity of the 

4.0% convertible senior notes.

As of the dates indicated, the following table sets forth, in thousands, the reconciliation of changes in Level 3 assets 

recorded at fair value:

Balance at October 31, 2009 

Initial recognition 

Changes in unrealized gain 

Transfers into Level 3 

Transfers out of Level 3 

Balance at October 31, 2010 

LeveL 3

$ 

   —

18,104

16,311

—

—

$34,415

During fiscal 2009, due to certain triggering events, Ciena recorded a non-cash loss on cost method investments of  

$5.3 million. Ciena utilized both Level 2 and Level 3 inputs in its fair value measurements for these investments.

(8)  aCCounTs ReCeIVable

As of October 31, 2010, no customers accounted for 10.0% of net trade accounts receivable. As of October 31, 2009, 

one customer accounted for 10.7% of net trade accounts receivable. Ciena’s allowance for doubtful accounts as of 

October 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 was $0.1 million and Ciena has not historically experienced a significant amount of 

bad debt expense.

The following table summarizes the activity in Ciena’s allowance for doubtful accounts for the fiscal years indicated 

(in thousands):

Year eNded 
october 31, 

2008 

2009 

2010 

(9)  InVenToRIes

baLaNce at 
begiNNiNg 
oF Period 

$132 

$124 

$116 

Net ProvisioNs 
(recoverY) 

$157 

$  93 

$  1 

deductioNs 

$165 

$101 

$  — 

As of the dates indicated, inventories are comprised of the following (in thousands):

october 31,

Raw materials 

Work-in-process 

Finished goods 

Deferred cost of  goods sold 

Provision for excess and obsolescence 

2009 

$  19,694 

1,480 

61,026 

29,888 

112,088 

(24,002) 

$  88,086 

baLaNce 
at eNd 
oF Period

$124

$116

$117

2010

$  30,569

6,993

177,994

76,830

292,386

(30,767)

$261,619

Ciena writes down its inventory for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory equal to the difference between 

the cost of inventory and the estimated market value based on assumptions about future demand and market conditions. 

During fiscal 2008, fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010, Ciena recorded provisions for inventory reserves of $18.3 million, $15.7 mil-

lion and $13.7 million, respectively, primarily related to changes in forecasted sales for certain products. Deductions from 

the reserve for excess and obsolete inventory relate to disposal activities.

Ciena Corporation 10-K

91

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The following table summarizes the activity in Ciena’s reserve for excess and obsolete inventory for the fiscal years indi-

cated (in thousands):

Year eNded 
october 31, 

2008 

2009 

2010 

baLaNce at 
begiNNiNg 
oF Period 

$26,170 

$23,257 

$24,002 

ProvisioNs 

disPosaLs 

$18,325 

$15,719 

$13,696 

$21,238 

$14,974 

$  6,931 

(10)  PRePaID eXPenses anD oTheR

As of the dates indicated, prepaid expenses and other are comprised of the following (in thousands):

october 31,

Prepaid VAT and other taxes 

Deferred deployment expense 

Product demonstration equipment, net 

Prepaid expenses 

Capitalized acquisition costs 

Restricted cash 

Contingent consideration 

Other non-trade receivables 

2009 

$14,527 

4,242 

— 

8,869 

12,473 

7,477 

— 

2,949 

$50,537 

baLaNce 
at eNd 
oF Period

$23,257

$24,002

$30,767

2010

$  46,352

6,918

29,449

15,087

—

12,994

30,195

6,685

$147,680

Prepaid expenses and other as of October 31, 2010 includes $29.4 million related to product demonstration equipment, 

net. Depreciation of product demonstration equipment was $4.2 million for fiscal 2010. Capitalized acquisition costs at 

October 31, 2009 include direct costs related to Ciena’s then pending acquisition of the MEN Business. In the first quar-

ter of fiscal 2010, Ciena adopted newly issued accounting guidance related to business combinations, which required 

the full amount of these capitalized acquisition costs to be expensed in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

(11)  equIPmenT, FuRnITuRe anD FIXTuRes

As of the dates indicated, equipment, furniture and fixtures are comprised of the following (in thousands):

Equipment, furniture and fixtures 

Leasehold improvements 

Accumulated depreciation and amortization 

october 31,

2009 

$ 293,093 

45,761 

338,854 

(276,986) 

$   61,868 

2010

$ 360,908

49,595

410,503

(290,209)

$ 120,294

During fiscal 2008, fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010, Ciena recorded depreciation of equipment, furniture and fixtures, and 

amortization of leasehold improvements of $18.6 million, $21.9 million and $38.5 million, respectively.

92

Ciena Corporation 10-K

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(12)  oTheR InTangIble asseTs

As of the dates indicated, other intangible assets are comprised of the following (in thousands):

october 31,

2009 

2010

gross 

accumuLated 
iNtaNgibLe  amortizatioN 

Net 
iNtaNgibLe 

gross 

accumuLated 
iNtaNgibLe  amortizatioN 

Net  
iNtaNgibLe

Developed technology 

$185,833 

$(147,504) 

$38,329 

$417,833 

$(186,129) 

$231,704

Patents and licenses 

47,370 

(42,811) 

4,559 

45,388 

(45,167) 

221

Customer relationships,  
  covenants not to compete,  
  outstanding purchase  
  orders and contracts 

60,981 

(43,049) 

17,932 

323,573 

(129,086) 

194,487

Total other intangible assets 

$294,184 

$(233,364) 

$60,820 

$786,794 

$(360,382) 

$426,412

The aggregate amortization expense of other intangible assets was $38.0 million, $31.4 million and $127.0 million for fis-

cal 2008, fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010, respectively. Expected future amortization of other intangible assets for the fiscal 

years indicated is as follows (in thousands):

Year eNded october 31,

2011 

2012 

2013 

2014 

2015 

Thereafter 

(13)  oTheR balanCe sheeT DeTaIls

As of the dates indicated, other long-term assets are comprised of the following (in thousands):

october 31,

Maintenance spares inventory, net 

Deferred debt issuance costs, net 

Embedded redemption feature 

Restricted cash 

Other 

2009 

$31,994 

12,832 

— 

18,792 

4,284 

$67,902 

 $  96,669

 73,564

 71,145

 56,987

 52,714

 75,333

 $426,412

2010

$  53,654

28,853

4,220

37,796

5,296

$129,819

Deferred debt issuance costs are amortized using the straight line method which approximates the effect of the 

effective interest rate method through the maturity of the related debt. Amortization of deferred debt issuance 

costs, which is included in interest expense, was $2.9 million, $2.3 million and $3.8 million for fiscal 2008, fiscal 2009 

and fiscal 2010, respectively.

Ciena Corporation 10-K

93

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
As of the dates indicated, accrued liabilities are comprised of the following (in thousands):

october 31,

Warranty 

Compensation, payroll related tax and benefits 

Vacation 

Current restructuring liabilities 

Interest payable 

Other 

2009 

$  40,196 

20,025 

11,508 

1,811 

2,045 

29,575 

$105,160 

2010

$  54,372

39,391

20,412

2,784

4,345

72,690

$193,994

The following table summarizes the activity in Ciena’s accrued warranty for the fiscal years indicated (in thousands):

Year eNded 
october 31, 

begiNNiNg 
baLaNce 

acquired 

ProvisioNs 

settLemeNts 

2008 

2009 

2010 

$33,580 

$37,258 

$40,196 

$ 

$ 

   — 

   — 

$24,041 

$15,336 

$19,286 

$15,353 

$11,658 

$16,348 

$25,218 

As of the dates indicated, deferred revenue is comprised of the following (in thousands):

october 31,

Products 

Services 

Less current portion 

Long-term deferred revenue 

2009 

$ 11,998  

63,935  

75,933  

(40,565) 

$ 35,368  

baLaNce  
at eNd oF 
Period

$37,258 

$40,196 

$54,372

2010

$  31,187

 73,862

105,049

(75,334)

$  29,715

(14)   FoReIgn CuRRenCy FoRWaRD ConTRaCTs

Ciena has previously used, and may in the future use, foreign currency forward contracts to reduce variability in non-

U.S. dollar denominated expected cash flows. As of October 31, 2009 and 2010, there were no foreign currency forward 

contracts outstanding and Ciena did not enter into any foreign currency forward contracts during fiscal 2010. During 

fiscal 2009, Ciena entered into such foreign currency forward contracts and these derivatives were designated as cash 

flow hedges. No portion of the hedging instruments was considered ineffective. Gains and losses from these foreign 

currency forward contracts were immaterial during fiscal 2009.

(15)  ConVeRTIble noTes Payable

Payment at Maturity of Convertible Notes Payable

3.75% Convertible Notes, due February 1, 2008

During fiscal 2008, Ciena paid at maturity the remaining $542.3 million in aggregate principal amount on its 3.75% con-

vertible notes. All of the notes were retired without conversion into common stock.

Outstanding Convertible Notes Payable

Ciena has four issuances of convertible notes payable outstanding. The notes are senior unsecured obligations of 

Ciena and rank equally with all of Ciena’s other existing and future senior unsecured debt. The indentures govern-

ing Ciena’s notes provide for customary events of default which include (subject in certain cases to customary grace 

and	cure	periods),	among	others,	the	following:	nonpayment	of	principal	or	interest;	breach	of	covenants	or	other 	

agreements	in	the	indenture;	defaults	in	failure	to	pay	certain	other	indebtedness;	and	certain	events	of	bankruptcy 	

94

Ciena Corporation 10-K

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
or insolvency. Generally, if an event of default occurs and is continuing, the trustee or the holders of at least 25% in 

aggregate principal amount of the notes may declare the principal of, accrued interest on, and premium, if any, on all 

the notes immediately due and payable. Under the indentures, if Ciena undergoes a “fundamental change” (as that 

term is defined in the indenture governing the notes to include certain change in control transactions), holders of 

notes will have the right, subject to certain exemptions, to require Ciena to purchase for cash any or all of their notes 

at a price equal to the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. If the holder elects to convert his or her 

notes in connection with a specified fundamental change, in certain circumstances, Ciena will be required to increase 

the applicable conversion rate, depending on the price paid per share for Ciena common stock and the effective date 

of the fundamental change transaction.

0.25% Convertible Senior Notes due May 1, 2013

On April 10, 2006, Ciena completed a public offering of 0.25% convertible senior notes due May 1, 2013, in aggregate 

principal amount of $300.0 million. Interest is payable on May 1 and November 1 of each year.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, Ciena repurchased $2.0 million in principal amount of its outstanding 0.25% 

convertible senior notes in an open market transaction. Ciena used $1.0 million of cash to effect these repurchases dur-

ing the quarter, which resulted in a gain of approximately $0.9 million. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, Ciena 

repurchased $81.8 million in aggregate principal amount of its outstanding 0.25 % convertible senior notes in privately 

negotiated transactions, which resulted in a gain of approximately $4.9 million. As of October 31, 2010, the outstanding 

principal on these notes was $216.2 million.

At the election of the holder, notes may be converted prior to maturity into shares of Ciena common stock at the initial 

conversion rate of 25.3001 shares per $1,000 in principal amount, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of 

$39.5255 per share. The notes may be redeemed by Ciena if the closing sale price of Ciena’s common stock for at least 

20 trading days in any 30 consecutive trading day period ending on the date one day prior to the date of the notice of 

redemption exceeds 130% of the conversion price. Ciena may redeem the notes in whole or in part, at a redemption 

price in cash equal to the principal amount to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest.

Ciena used approximately $28.5 million of the net proceeds of this offering to purchase a call spread option on its com-

mon stock that is intended to limit exposure to potential dilution from the conversion of the notes. See Note 17 below 

for a description of this call spread option.

4.0% Convertible Senior Notes, due March 15, 2015

On March 15, 2010, Ciena completed a private placement of 4.0% convertible senior notes due March 15, 2015, in 

aggregate principal amount of $375.0 million. Interest is payable on the notes on March 15 and September 15 of each 

year, beginning on September 15, 2010.

At the election of the holder, the notes may be converted prior to maturity into shares of Ciena common stock at the ini-

tial conversion rate of 49.0557 shares per $1,000 in principal amount, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of 

approximately $20.38 per share. The notes may be redeemed by Ciena on or after March 15, 2013 if the closing sale price 

of Ciena’s common stock for at least 20 trading days in any 30 consecutive trading day period ending on the date one 

day prior to the date of the notice of redemption exceeds 150% of the conversion price. Ciena may redeem the notes in 

whole or in part, at a redemption price in cash equal to the principal amount to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid 

interest, including any additional interest to, but excluding, the redemption date, plus a make-whole premium payment. 

The “make whole premium” payment will be made in cash and equal the present value of the remaining interest pay-

ments, to maturity, computed using a discount rate equal to 2.75%. The make-whole premium is paid to holders whether 

or not they convert the notes following Ciena’s issuance of a redemption notice. For accounting purposes, this redemp-

tion feature is an embedded derivative that is not clearly and closely related to the notes. Consequently, it was initially 

bifurcated from the indenture and separately recorded at its fair value as an asset with subsequent changes in fair value 

recorded through earnings. As of October 31, 2010, the fair value of the embedded redemption feature was $4.2 million 

and is included in other long-term assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Since inception on March 15, 2010, the 

Ciena Corporation 10-K

95

changes in fair value of the embedded redemption feature in the amount of $2.5 million were reflected as interest and 

other income (loss), net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

The net proceeds from the offering of the notes were $364.3 million after deducting the placement agents’ fees and 

other fees and expenses. Ciena used $243.8 million of this amount to fund its payment election to replace its contrac-

tual obligation to issue convertible notes to Nortel as part of the aggregate purchase price for the acquisition of the 

MEN Business. The remaining proceeds were used to reduce the cash on hand required to fund the aggregate pur-

chase price of the MEN Business. See Note 2 above.

0.875% Convertible Senior Notes due June 15, 2017

On June 11, 2007, Ciena completed a public offering of 0.875% convertible senior notes due June 15, 2017, in aggre-

gate principal amount of $500.0 million. Interest is payable on June 15 and December 15 of each year, beginning on 

December 15, 2007.

At the election of the holder, notes may be converted prior to maturity into shares of Ciena common stock at the initial 

conversion rate of 26.2154 shares per $1,000 in principal amount, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of 

approximately $38.15 per share. The notes are not redeemable by Ciena prior to maturity.

Ciena used approximately $42.5 million of the net proceeds of this offering to purchase a call spread option on its com-

mon stock that is intended to limit exposure to potential dilution from conversion of the notes. See Note 17 below for a 

description of this call spread option.

3.75% Convertible Senior Notes, due October 15, 2018

On October 18, 2010, Ciena completed a private placement of 3.75% convertible senior notes due October 15, 2018, in 

aggregate principal amount of $350.0 million. Interest is payable on the notes on April 15 and October 15 of each year, 

beginning on April 15, 2011.

At the election of the holder, the notes may be converted prior to maturity into shares of Ciena common stock at the 

initial conversion rate of 49.5872 shares per $1,000 in principal amount, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price 

of approximately $20.17 per share.

The net proceeds from the offering were approximately $340.4 million after deducting the placement agents’ fees and 

other fees and expenses. Ciena used $76.1 million of the net proceeds to effect the repurchase of its 0.25% convertible 

senior notes due 2013 described above.

The following table sets forth, in thousands, the carrying value and the estimated current fair value of Ciena’s outstand-

ing convertible notes:

descriPtioN 

carrYiNg vaLue 

october 31, 2010

0.25% Convertible Senior Notes due May 1, 2013 

4.0% Convertible Senior Notes, due March 15, 2015(1) 

0.875% Convertible Senior Notes due June 15, 2017 

3.75% Convertible Senior Notes, due October 15, 2018 

 $   216,210  

 376,495  

 500,000  

 350,000  

 $1,442,705  

Fair vaLue

 $   197,300

 371,260

 366,700

 339,500

 $1,274,760

(1)  Includes unamortized bond premium related to embedded redemption feature

Except for the 4.0% convertible senior notes, the fair value reported above is based on the quoted market price for the 

notes on the date above. Due to the lack of trading activity, the fair value of the 4.0% convertible senior notes is based 

on a modified binomial model as described above.

96

Ciena Corporation 10-K

 
 
(16)  eaRnIngs PeR shaRe CalCulaTIon

The following table (in thousands except per share amounts) is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of 

the basic net income (loss) per common share (“Basic EPS”) and the diluted net income (loss) per potential common 

share (“Diluted EPS”). Basic EPS is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. 

Diluted EPS is computed using the weighted average number of (i) common shares outstanding, (ii) shares issuable 

upon vesting of restricted stock units, (iii) shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options, employee stock 

purchase	plan	options	and	warrants	using	the	treasury	stock	method;	and	(iv)	shares	underlying	Ciena’s	outstanding	

convertible notes.

Diluted EPS for fiscal 2010 reflects only a portion of the shares underlying the 4.0% and 3.75% senior convertible notes 

because they were issued on March 15, 2010 and October 15, 2010, respectively.

Numerator 

Net income (loss) 

Add: Interest expense for 0.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2013 

Add: Interest expense for 0.875% Convertible Senior Notes due 2017 

Net income (loss) used to calculate Diluted EPS 

deNomiNator 

Basic weighted average shares outstanding 

Add: Shares underlying outstanding stock options, employees stock  
  purchase plan options, warrants and restricted stock units 

Add: Shares underlying  0.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2013 

Add: Shares underlying 0.875% Convertible Senior Notes due 2017 

Dilutive weighted average shares outstanding 

ePs 

Basic EPS 

Diluted EPS 

2008 

$38,894 

1,874 

5,510 

$46,278 

2008 

89,146 

761 

7,590 

13,108 

110,605 

2008 

$0.44 

$0.42 

Year eNded october 31,

2009 

2010

$(581,154) 

$(333,514)

— 

— 

—

—

$(581,154) 

$(333,514)

Year eNded october 31,

2009 

91,167 

— 

— 

— 

2010

93,103

—

—

—

91,167 

93,103

Year eNded october 31,

2009 

$(6.37) 

$(6.37) 

2010

$(3.58)

$(3.58)

Explanation of Shares Excluded due to Anti-Dilutive Effect

The weighted average number of certain shares underlying outstanding stock options, employee stock purchase plan 

options, restricted stock units and warrants in the table below are considered anti-dilutive because the exercise price 

of these awards is greater than the average closing price per share on the NASDAQ Stock Market during this period. In 

addition, the weighted average number of shares underlying Ciena’s outstanding convertible senior notes, are consid-

ered anti-dilutive because the related interest expense on a per common share “if converted” basis exceeds Basic EPS 

for the period.

Ciena Corporation 10-K

97

 
 
 
The following table summarizes the weighted average shares excluded from the calculation of the denominator for 

Basic and Diluted EPS due to their anti-dilutive effect for the fiscal years indicated (in thousands):

WeighTeD AveRAge shARes exCluDeD FROM 
eps DenOMinATOR Due TO AnTi-DiluTive eFFeCT 

Shares underlying stock options, restricted stock units and warrants 

3.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2008 

0.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2013 

0.875% Convertible Senior Notes due 2017 

4.0% Convertible Senior Notes due 2015 

3.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2018 

Total excluded due to anti-dilutive effect 

(17)  sToCKholDeRs’ equITy

Call Spread Option

Year eNded october 31,

2008 

5,311 

182 

— 

— 

— 

— 

2009 

8,302 

— 

7,539 

13,108 

— 

— 

5,493 

28,949 

2010

7,397

—

7,454

13,108

11,605

717

40,281

Ciena holds two call spread options on its common stock relating to the shares issuable upon conversion of two issues 

of convertible notes. These call spread options are designed to mitigate exposure to potential dilution from the conver-

sion of these notes. Ciena purchased a call spread option relating to the 0.25% convertible senior notes due May 1, 2013 

for $28.5 million during the second quarter of fiscal 2006. Ciena purchased a call spread option relating to the 0.875% 

convertible senior notes due June 15, 2017 for $42.5 million during the third quarter of fiscal 2007. In each case, the call 

spread options were purchased at the time of the notes offering from an affiliate of the underwriter. The cost of each 

call spread option was recorded as a reduction in paid-in capital.

Each call spread option is exercisable, upon maturity of the relevant issue of convertible notes, for such number of 

shares of Ciena common stock issuable upon conversion of that series of notes in full. Each call spread option has a 

“lower strike price” equal to the conversion price for the notes and a “higher strike price” that serves to cap the amount 

of dilution protection provided. At its election, Ciena can exercise the call spread options on a net cash basis or a net 

share basis. The value of the consideration of a net share settlement will be equal to the value upon a net cash settle-

ment and can range from $0, if the market price per share of Ciena common stock upon exercise is equal to or below 

the lower strike price, to approximately $45.7 million (in the case of the April 2006 call spread option) or approximately 

$76.1 million (in the case of the June 2007 call spread), if the market price per share of Ciena common stock upon exer-

cise is at or above the higher strike price. If the market price on the date of exercise is between the lower strike price 

and the higher strike price, in lieu of a net settlement, Ciena may elect to receive the full number of shares underlying 

the call spread option by paying the aggregate option exercise price, which is equal to the original principal outstand-

ing on that series of notes. Should there be an early unwind of the call spread option, the amount of cash or shares to 

be received by Ciena will depend upon the existing overall market conditions, and on Ciena’s stock price, the volatil-

ity of Ciena’s stock and the remaining term of the call spread option. The number of shares subject to the call spread 

options, and the lower and higher strike prices, are subject to customary adjustments.

98

Ciena Corporation 10-K

(18)  InCome TaXes

For the periods indicated, the provision (benefit) for income taxes consists of the following (in thousands):

Provision (benefit) for income taxes:

Current:

Federal 

State 

Foreign 

Total current 

Deferred:

Federal 

State 

Foreign 

Total deferred 

Provision (benefit) for income taxes 

2008 

$  (712) 

209 

1,508 

1,005 

1,640 

— 

— 

1,640 

$2,645 

october 31,

2009 

$(3,488) 

122 

2,925 

(441) 

(860) 

(23) 

— 

(883) 

2010

$  (918)

223

1,936

1,241

700

—

—

700

$(1,324) 

$1,941

For the periods indicated, income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes consists of the following (in thousands):

United States 

Foreign 

Total 

2008 

$32,868 

8,671 

$41,539 

october 31,

2009 

$(591,637) 

9,159 

$(582,478) 

2010

$(317,899)

(13,674)

$(331,573)

For the periods indicated, the tax provision (benefit) reconciles to the amount computed by multiplying income or loss 

before income taxes by the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% as follows:

Provision at statutory rate 

State taxes 

Foreign taxes 

Research and development credit 

Goodwill impairment 

Non-deductible compensation and other 

Valuation allowance 

Effective income tax rate 

2008 

35.00% 

0.50% 

(3.67%) 

(2.60%) 

0.00% 

11.20% 

(34.06%) 

6.37% 

october 31,

2009 

35.00% 

(0.02%) 

0.05% 

0.60% 

(27.38%) 

(1.42%) 

(6.60%) 

0.23% 

The significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities were as follows (in thousands):

october 31,

Deferred tax assets:

Reserves and accrued liabilities 

Depreciation and amortization 

NOL and credit carry forward 

Other 

Gross deferred tax assets 

Valuation allowance 

Net deferred tax asset 

Ciena Corporation 10-K

2009 

$ 

  31,088 

159,858 

965,529 

42,292 

1,198,767 

(1,198,067) 

$ 

   700 

2010

35.00%

(0.07%)

(4.56%)

2.54%

0.00%

(1.43%)

(32.07%)

(0.59%)

2010

$ 

   30,889 

186,716 

1,107,059 

38,829 

1,363,493 

(1,363,493)

$ 

  —

99

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, is 

as follows (in thousands):

Unrecognized tax benefits at October 31, 2008 

Increase related to positions taken in prior period 

Increase related to positions taken in current period 

Reductions related to expiration of statute of limitations 

Unrecognized tax benefits at October 31, 2009 

Increase related to positions taken in prior period 

Increase related to positions taken in current period 

Reductions related to expiration of statute of limitations 

Unrecognized tax benefits at October 31, 2010 

$ 4,436 

106 

1,947 

 (300)

 6,189 

26 

3,383 

 (2,156)

 $ 7,442

As of October 31, 2009 and 2010, Ciena had accrued $1.2 million and $1.4 million of interest, respectively, and some minor 

penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within other long-term liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, of 

which $0.1 million and $0.2 million of interest was recorded to the provision for income taxes during fiscal 2009 and 2010, 

respectively. If recognized, the entire balance of unrecognized tax benefits would impact the effective tax rate. Over the 

next 12 months, Ciena does not estimate any material changes in the unrecognized income tax benefits.

During fiscal 2002, Ciena established a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets. Ciena intends to maintain a 

valuation allowance until sufficient positive evidence exists to support a reversal. Any future release of valuation allow-

ance may be recorded as a tax benefit increasing net income or as an adjustment to paid-in capital, based on tax order-

ing requirements. The following table summarizes the activity in Ciena’s valuation allowance against its gross deferred 

tax assets (in thousands):

Year eNded 
october 31, 

2008 

2009 

2010 

baLaNce at 
begiNNiNg 
oF Period 

$1,180,123 

$1,164,384 

$1,198,067 

additioNs 

deductioNs 

$ 

 — 

$  33,683 

$165,426 

$15,739 

$ 

$ 

   — 

   — 

baLaNce  
at eNd oF  
Period

$1,164,384 

$1,198,067 

$1,363,493

As of October 31, 2010, Ciena had a $2.7 billion net operating loss carry forward and a $0.1 billion income tax credit 

carry forward which begin to expire in fiscal year 2018 and 2013, respectively. Ciena’s ability to use net operating losses 

and credit carry forwards is subject to limitations pursuant to the ownership change rules of the Internal Revenue Code 

Section 382.

The income tax provision does not reflect the tax savings resulting from deductions associated with Ciena’s equity 

compensation and the call spread option associated with Ciena’s convertible debt. The cumulative tax benefit through 

October 31, 2010 of approximately $76 million will be credited to additional paid-in capital when realized. For deduc-

tions associated with Ciena’s equity compensation, credits to paid-in capital will be recorded when those tax benefits 

are used to reduce taxes payable.

(19)  shaRe-baseD ComPensaTIon eXPense

Ciena grants equity awards under its 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan (“2008 Plan”) and 2003 Employee Stock Purchase 

Plan (“ESPP”). In connection with its acquisition of the MEN Business, Ciena also adopted the 2010 Inducement Equity 

Award Plan, pursuant to which it has made awards to eligible persons as described below.

2008 Plan

The 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2008 Plan”) was approved by Ciena’s Board of Directors on December 12, 2007 

and became effective upon the approval of Ciena’s stockholders on March 26, 2008. The 2008 Plan has a ten year term. 

The 2008 Plan reserves eight million shares of common stock for issuance, subject to increase from time to time by the 

100

Ciena Corporation 10-K

 
 
 
 
 
 
number of shares: (i) subject to outstanding awards granted under Ciena’s prior equity compensation plans that termi-

nate without delivery of any stock (to the extent such shares would have been available for issuance under such prior 

plan), and (ii) subject to awards assumed or substituted in connection with the acquisition of another company.

The 2008 Plan authorizes the issuance of awards including stock options, restricted stock units (RSUs), restricted stock, 

unrestricted	stock,	stock	appreciation	rights	(SARs)	and	other	equity	and/or	cash	performance	incentive	awards	to	

employees, directors, and consultants of Ciena. Subject to certain restrictions, the Compensation Committee of the 

Board of Directors has broad discretion to establish the terms and conditions for awards under the 2008 Plan, including 

the number of shares, vesting conditions and the required service or performance criteria. Options and SARs have a 

maximum term of ten years, and their exercise price may not be less than 100% of fair market value on the date of grant. 

Repricing of stock options and SARs is prohibited without stockholder approval. Certain change in control transactions 

may cause awards granted under the 2008 Plan to vest, unless the awards are continued or substituted for in connec-

tion with the transaction.

Pursuant to Board and stockholder approval, effective April 14, 2010, Ciena amended its 2008 Plan to (i) increase the 

number	of	shares	available	for	issuance	by	five	million	shares;	and	(ii)	reduce	from	1.6	to	1.31	the	fungible	share	ratio	

used for counting full value awards, such as restricted stock units, against the shares remaining available under the 2008 

Plan. As of October 31, 2010, there were approximately 5.8 million shares authorized and remaining available for issu-

ance under the 2008 Plan.

2010 Inducement Equity Award Plan

On December 8, 2009, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved the 2010 Inducement Equity 

Award Plan (the “2010 Plan”). The 2010 Plan is intended to enhance Ciena’s ability to attract and retain certain key 

employees transferred to Ciena in connection with its acquisition of the MEN Business. The 2010 Plan authorizes the 

issuance of restricted stock or restricted stock units representing up to 2.25 million shares of Ciena common stock. 

Upon the March 19, 2011 termination of the 2010 Plan, any shares then remaining available shall cease to be available 

for issuance under the 2010 Plan or any other existing Ciena equity incentive plan. As of October 31, 2010, there were 

approximately 0.7 million shares authorized and available for issuance under the 2010 Plan.

Stock Options

Outstanding stock option awards to employees are generally subject to service-based vesting restrictions and vest 

incrementally over a four-year period. The following table is a summary of Ciena’s stock option activity for the periods 

indicated (shares in thousands):

Balance as of October 31, 2007 

Granted 

Granted in exchange for WWP options 

Exercised 

Canceled 

Balance as of October 31, 2008 

Granted 

Exercised 

Canceled 

Balance as of October 31, 2009 

Granted 

Exercised 

Canceled 

Balance as of October 31, 2010 

sHares uNderLYiNg  
oPtioNs outstaNdiNg 

weigHted average 
exercise Price

5,871 

760 

934 

(658) 

(508) 

6,399 

234 

(107) 

(988) 

5,538 

86 

(103) 

(519) 

5,002 

$53.67

28.92

7.50

7.12

52.79

48.84

8.63

2.33

61.40

45.80

12.42

5.21

95.00

$40.96

Ciena Corporation 10-K

101

 
 
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during fiscal 2008, fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 was $14.7 million, $0.7 million 

and $0.9 million, respectively. The weighted average fair value of each stock option granted by Ciena during fiscal 2008, 

fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 was $14.52, $4.94 and $6.94, respectively.

The following table summarizes information with respect to stock options outstanding at October 31, 2010, based on 

Ciena’s closing stock price of $13.81 per share on the last trading day of Ciena’s fiscal 2010 (shares and intrinsic value 

in thousands):

raNge oF 
exercise Price 

$  0.01–$ 

 16.52 

$16.53–$ 

 17.43 

$17.44–$ 

 22.96 

oPtioNs outstaNdiNg at october 31, 2010 

vested oPtioNs at october 31, 2010

weigHted 
average 

Number  remaiNiNg  weigHted 

weigHted 
average 

oF 
uNderLYiNg 
sHares 

coNtractuaL  average  aggregate 
exercise 
Price 

LiFe 
(Years) 

vaLue 

iNtriNsic  uNderLYiNg 

Number  remaiNiNg  weigHted 
oF  coNtractuaL  average 
exercise 
Price 

LiFe 
(Years) 

sHares 

aggregate 
iNtriNsic 
vaLue

846 

506 

430 

6.16 

4.95 

4.41 

4.18 

5.52 

2.08 

0.91 

4.33 

$  11.19 

$3,112 

17.21 

21.75 

29.44 

39.38 

59.70 

149.84 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

635 

480 

401 

1,329 

718 

436 

505 

$  40.96 

$3,112 

4,504 

5.36 

4.80 

4.19 

3.99 

5.19 

2.08 

0.91 

3.95 

$  11.52 

$2,346

17.20 

21.83 

29.51 

39.74 

59.70 

149.84 

—

—

—

—

—

—

$  43.01 

$2,346

$22.97–$ 

 31.71 

1,414 

$31.72–$ 

 46.90 

$46.91–$ 

 73.78 

$73.79–$1,046.50 

865 

436 

505 

$  0.01–$1,046.50 

5,002 

Assumptions for Option-Based Awards

Ciena recognizes the fair value of service-based options as share-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis 

over the requisite service period. Ciena estimates the fair value of each option award on the date of grant using the 

Black-Scholes option-pricing model, with the following weighted average assumptions:

Expected volatility 

Risk-free interest rate 

Expected term (years) 

Expected dividend yield 

2008 

53.0% 

2.7–3.6% 

5.1–5.3 

0.0% 

Year eNded october 31,

2009 

65.0% 

1.7–3.1% 

5.2–5.3 

0.0% 

2010

61.9%

2.0–3.0%

5.3–5.5

0.0%

Ciena considered the implied volatility and historical volatility of its stock price in determining its expected volatility, 

and, finding both to be equally reliable, determined that a combination of both would result in the best estimate of 

expected volatility.

The risk-free interest rate assumption is based upon observed interest rates appropriate for the expected term of 

Ciena’s employee stock options.

The expected life of employee stock options represents the weighted-average period the stock options are expected 

to remain outstanding. Ciena uses historical information about specific exercise behavior of its grantees to determine 

the expected term.

The dividend yield assumption is based on Ciena’s history and expectation of dividend payouts.

Because share-based compensation expense is recognized only for those awards that are ultimately expected to vest, the 

amount of share-based compensation expense recognized reflects a reduction for estimated forfeitures. Ciena estimates 

forfeitures at the time of grant and revises those estimates in subsequent periods based upon new or changed information. 

Ciena relies upon historical experience in establishing forfeiture rates. If actual forfeitures differ from current estimates, total 

unrecognized share-based compensation expense will be adjusted for future changes in estimated forfeitures.

102

Ciena Corporation 10-K

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Restricted Stock Units

A restricted stock unit is a stock award that entitles the holder to receive shares of Ciena common stock as the unit 

vests.	Ciena’s	outstanding	restricted	stock	unit	awards	are	subject	to	service-based	vesting	conditions	and/or	perfor-

mance-based vesting conditions. Awards subject to service-based conditions typically vest in increments over a three 

to four-year period. Awards with performance-based vesting conditions require the achievement of certain operational, 

financial or other performance criteria or targets as a condition of vesting, or acceleration of vesting, of such awards.

Ciena’s outstanding restricted stock units include “performance-accelerated” restricted stock units (PARS), which vest 

in full four years after the date of grant (assuming that the grantee is still employed by Ciena at that time). At the begin-

ning of each of the first three fiscal years following the date of grant, the Compensation Committee establishes one-

year performance targets which, if satisfied, provide for the acceleration of vesting of one-third of the award. As a result, 

the recipient has the opportunity, subject to satisfaction of performance conditions, to vest as to the entire award in 

three years. Ciena recognizes the estimated fair value of performance-based awards, net of estimated forfeitures, as 

share-based expense over the performance period, using graded vesting, which considers each performance period 

or tranche separately, based upon Ciena’s determination of whether it is probable that the performance targets will be 

achieved. At each reporting period, Ciena reassess the probability of achieving the performance targets and the per-

formance period required to meet those targets.

The aggregate intrinsic value of Ciena’s restricted stock units is based on Ciena’s closing stock price on the last trading 

day of each period as indicated. The following table is a summary of Ciena’s restricted stock unit activity for the periods 

indicated, with the aggregate intrinsic value of the balance outstanding at the end of each period, based on Ciena’s 

closing stock price on the last trading day of the relevant period (shares and aggregate intrinsic value in thousands):

Balance as of October 31, 2007 

Granted 

Vested 

Canceled or forfeited 

Balance as of October 31, 2008 

Granted 

Vested 

Canceled or forfeited 

Balance as of October 31, 2009 

Granted 

Vested 

Canceled or forfeited 

Balance as of October 31, 2010 

restricted 
stock uNits 
outstaNdiNg 

1,135 

1,411

(513)

(184)

1,849 

3,364

(1,358)

(139)

3,716 

3,643

(1,846)

(322)

5,191 

weigHted average 
graNt date 
Fair vaLue 
Per sHare 

$27.94 

aggregate  
Fair vaLue

$53,236

30.85 

17,773

14.67 

43,591

$13.81 

$71,681

The total fair value of restricted stock units that vested and were converted into common stock during fiscal 2008, fis-

cal 2009 and fiscal 2010 was $14.6 million, $14.7 million and $25.7 million, respectively. The weighted average fair value 

of each restricted stock unit granted by Ciena during fiscal 2008, fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 was $32.38, $7.02 and 

$13.43, respectively.

Assumptions for Restricted Stock Unit Awards

The fair value of each restricted stock unit award is estimated using the intrinsic value method, which is based on the 

closing price on the date of grant. Share-based expense for service-based restricted stock unit awards is recognized, 

net of estimated forfeitures, ratably over the vesting period on a straight-line basis.

Ciena Corporation 10-K

103

 
 
 
 
 
Share-based expense for performance-based restricted stock unit awards, net of estimated forfeitures, is recognized 

ratably over the performance period based upon Ciena’s determination of whether it is probable that the performance 

targets will be achieved. At each reporting period, Ciena reassesses the probability of achieving the performance tar-

gets and the performance period required to meet those targets. The estimation of whether the performance targets 

will be achieved involves judgment, and the estimate of expense is revised periodically based on the probability of 

achieving the performance targets. Revisions are reflected in the period in which the estimate is changed. If any perfor-

mance goals are not met, no compensation cost is ultimately recognized against that goal and, to the extent previously 

recognized, compensation cost is reversed.

2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

In March 2003, Ciena stockholders approved the 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”), which has a ten-year 

term. Ciena stockholders subsequently approved an amendment increasing the number of shares available to 3.6 mil-

lion and adopting an “evergreen” provision. On December 31 of each year, the number of shares available under the 

ESPP will increase by up to 0.6 million shares, provided that the total number of shares available at that time shall not 

exceed 3.6 million. Pursuant to the evergreen provision, the maximum number of shares that may be added to the ESPP 

during the remainder of its ten-year term is 2.4 million.

Under the ESPP, eligible employees may enroll in a six-month offer period during certain open enrollment periods. Prior 

to October 1, 2010, new offer periods began March 16 and September 16 of each year and the purchase price was equal 

to 95% of the fair market value of Ciena common stock on the last day of each purchase period. Prior to October 1, 

2010, the ESPP was non-compensatory for purposes of share-based compensation expense.

Beginning on October 1, 2010, the six-month offer periods begin on December 21 and June 21 of each year with an 

initial stub period running from October 1, 2010 through December 20, 2010. The purchase price is equal to 85% of the 

lower of the fair market value of Ciena common stock on the day preceding each offer period or the last day of each 

offer period. The current ESPP is considered compensatory for purposes of share-based compensation expense.

The following table is a summary of ESPP activity for the periods indicated (shares and intrinsic value in thousands):

esPP sHares avaiLabLe  

For issuaNce 

iNtriNisic vaLue at 

stock issuaNce date

Balance as of October 31, 2007 

Evergreen provision 

Issued March 15, 2008 

Issued September 15, 2008 

Balance as of October 31, 2008 

Evergreen provision 

Issued March 16, 2009 

Issued September 15, 2009 

Balance as of October 31, 2009 

Evergreen provision 

Issued March 15, 2010 

Issued September 16, 2010 

Balance as of October 31, 2010 

3,383

188

(38) 

(45) 

3,488

83

(67) 

(35) 

3,469

102

(33) 

(40) 

3,498

$99

26

23

28

27

$30

104

Ciena Corporation 10-K

 
 
Share-Based Compensation Expense for Periods Reported

The following table summarizes share-based compensation expense for the periods indicated (in thousands):

Product costs 

Service costs 

Share-based compensation expense included in cost of goods sold 

Research and development 

Sales and marketing 

General and administrative 

Acquisition and integration costs 

Share-based compensation expense included in operating expense 

Share-based compensation expense capitalized in inventory, net 

2008 

$  2,953 

1,412 

4,365 

7,264 

10,928 

8,644 

— 

26,836 

227 

Year eNded october 31,

2009 

$  2,116 

1,599 

3,715 

10,006 

10,861 

10,380 

— 

31,247 

(524) 

2010

$  2,140

1,717

3,857

9,310

10,950

9,959

1,342

31,561

142

Total share-based compensation 

$31,428 

$34,438 

$35,560

As of October 31, 2010, total unrecognized compensation expense was $60.9 million: (i) $5.4 million, which relates to unvested 

stock	options	and	is	expected	to	be	recognized	over	a	weighted-average	period	of	0.9	year;	and	(ii)	$55.5	million,	which	

relates to unvested restricted stock units and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.6 years.

(20)  segmenT anD enTITy WIDe DIsClosuRes

Segment Reporting

Effective upon the March 19, 2010 completion of Ciena’s acquisition of the MEN Business, Ciena reorganized its internal 

organizational structure and the management of its business. Ciena’s chief operating decision maker, its chief executive 

officer, evaluates performance and allocates resources based on multiple factors, including segment profit (loss) infor-

mation for the following product categories:

•	 Packet-OPtical	transPOrt includes optical transport solutions that increase network capacity and enable 

more rapid delivery of a broader mix of high-bandwidth services. These products are used by network operators 

to facilitate the cost effective and efficient transport of voice, video and data traffic in core networks, as well as 

regional, metro and access networks. Ciena’s principal products in this segment include its ActivFlex 6500 Packet-

Optical	Platform	(ActivFlex	6500);	ActivFlex	6110	Multiservice	Optical	Platform	(ActivFlex	6110);	ActivSpan	5200	

(ActivSpan	5200);	ActivSpanCommon	Photonic	Layer	(CPL);	Optical	Multiservice	Edge	1000	series	(OME	1000);	

and Optical Metro 3500 (OM 3500). This segment includes sales of Ciena’s ActivSpan 4200 Advanced Services 

Platform (ActivSpan 4200) and its Corestream® Agility Optical Transport System (Corestream). This segment 

also	includes	sales	from	legacy	SONET/SDH	products	and	legacy	data	networking	products,	as	well	as	certain	

enterprise-oriented transport solutions that support storage and LAN extension, interconnection of data cen-

ters, and virtual private networks. This segment also includes operating system software and enhanced software 

features embedded in each of these products. Revenue from this segment is included in product revenue on the 

Consolidated Statement of Operations.

•	 Packet-OPtical	switching includes optical switching platforms that enable automated optical infrastruc-

tures for the delivery of a wide variety of enterprise and consumer-oriented network services. Ciena’s principal 

products in this segment include its CoreDirector®	Multiservice	Optical	Switch;	CoreDirector	FS	and	ActivFlex	

5400 family of Reconfigurable Switching Systems. These products include multiservice, multi-protocol switching 

systems	that	consolidate	the	functionality	of	an	add/drop	multiplexer,	digital	cross-connect	and	packet	switch	

into a single, high-capacity intelligent switching system. These products address both the core and metro seg-

ments	of	communications	networks	and	support	key	managed	service	services,	Ethernet/TDM	Private	Line,	Triple	

Play and IP services. This segment also includes sales of operating system software and enhanced software fea-

tures embedded in each of these products. Revenue from this segment is included in product revenue on the 

Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Ciena Corporation 10-K

105

 
 
•	 carrier	ethernet	service	Delivery includes the ActivEdge 3900 family of service delivery switches and 

service aggregation switches, as well as the ActivEdge 5100 family. These products support the access and 

aggregation tiers of communications networks and have principally been deployed to support wireless back-

haul infrastructures and business data services. Employing sophisticated Carrier Ethernet switching technol-

ogy, these products deliver quality of service capabilities, virtual local area networking and switching functions, 

and carrier-grade operations, administration, and maintenance features. This segment includes the metro 

Ethernet routing switch (MERS) product line and legacy broadband products, including the CNX-5 Broadband 

DSL System (CNX-5) which transitions legacy voice networks to support Internet-based (IP) telephony, video 

services and DSL. This segment also includes sales of operating system software and enhanced software fea-

tures embedded in each of these products. Revenue from this segment is included in product revenue on the 

Consolidated Statement of Operations.

•	 sOftware	anD	services includes Ciena’s integrated network and service management software designed 

to automate and simplify network management and operation, while increasing network performance and func-

tionality. These software solutions can track individual services across multiple product suites, facilitating planned 

network maintenance, outage detection and identification of customers or services affected by network troubles. 

This segment also includes a broad range of consulting and support services, including installation and deploy-

ment, maintenance support, consulting, network design and training activities. Except for revenue from the 

software portion of this segment, which is included in product revenue, revenue from this segment is included in 

services revenue on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Reportable segment asset information is not disclosed because it is not reviewed by the chief operating decision maker 

for purposes of evaluating performance and allocating resources.

The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth Ciena’s segment revenue, including the presentation 

of prior periods to reflect the change in reportable segments, for the respective periods:

2008 

%* 

2009 

%* 

2010 

FiscaL Year

Revenues:

Packet-Optical Transport 

Packet-Optical Switching 

Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery 

Software and Services 

$447,542 

270,458 

60,499 

123,949 

49.6 

30.0 

6.7 

13.7 

$299,088 

165,705 

75,125 

112,711 

45.8 

25.4 

11.5 

17.3 

$   705,551 

112,058 

179,083 

239,944 

%*

57.0

9.1

14.5

19.4

Consolidated revenue 

$902,448 

100.0 

$652,629 

100.0 

$1,236,636 

100.0

*  Denotes % of total revenue

Segment Profit (Loss)

Segment profit (loss) is determined based on internal performance measures used by the chief executive officer to 

assess the performance of each operating segment in a given period. In connection with that assessment, the chief 

executive	officer	excludes	the	following	items:	selling	and	marketing	costs;	general	and	administrative	costs;	acquisition	

and	integration	costs;	amortization	of	intangible	assets;	restructuring	costs;	goodwill	impairment;	change	in	fair	value	

of	contingent	consideration;	interest	and	other	income	(net),	interest	expense,	equity	investment	gains	or	losses,	gains	

or losses on extinguishment of debt, and provisions (benefit) for income taxes.

106

Ciena Corporation 10-K

 
 
The table below (in thousands) sets forth Ciena’s segment profit (loss) and the reconciliation to consolidated net income 

(loss) including the presentation of prior periods to reflect the change in reportable operating segments during the 

respective periods:

Segment profit (loss):

Packet-Optical Transport 

Packet-Optical Switching 

Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery 

Software and Services 

Total segment profit (loss) 

Other non performance items:

Selling and marketing 

General and administrative 

Acquisition and integration costs 

Amortization of intangible assets 

Restructuring costs 

Goodwill impairment 

Change in fair value of contingent consideration 

Interest and other financial charges, net 

Realized loss due to impairment of marketable debt investments 

Loss on cost method investments 

Gain on extinguishment of debt 

(Provision) benefit for income taxes 

2008 

FiscaL Year

2009 

2010

$ 110,905 

$   21,535 

$   69,319

151,084 

(17,764) 

31,679 

275,904 

(152,018) 

(68,639) 

— 

(32,264) 

(1,110) 

— 

— 

23,835 

(5,101) 

— 

932 

(2,645) 

60,302 

(9,575) 

22,249 

94,511 

(134,527) 

(47,509) 

— 

(24,826) 

(11,207) 

(455,673) 

— 

2,081 

— 

(5,328) 

— 

1,324 

15,662

28,742

56,152

169,875

(193,515)

(102,692)

(101,379)

(99,401)

(8,514)

—

13,807

(14,702)

—

—

4,948

(1,941)

Consolidated net income (loss) 

$   38,894 

$(581,154) 

$(333,514)

Entity Wide Reporting

The following table reflects Ciena’s geographic distribution of revenue based on the location of the purchaser, with any 

country accounting for greater than 10% of total revenue in the period specifically identified. Revenue attributable to 

geographic regions outside of the United States and the United Kingdom is reflected as “Other International” revenue. 

For the periods below, Ciena’s geographic distribution of revenue was as follows (in thousands, except percentage data):

United States 

United	Kingdom	

Other International 

Total 

2008 

$590,868 

149,426	

162,154 

$902,448 

%* 

65.5 

16.5	

18.0 

100.0 

2009 

$419,405 

81,784	

151,440 

$652,629 

%* 

64.3 

12.5	

23.2 

2010 

$   744,232 

n/a	

492,404 

%*

60.2

—

39.8

100.0 

$1,236,636 

100.0

FiscaL Year

n/a	Denotes	revenue	representing	less	than	10%	of	total	revenue	for	the	period
*  Denotes % of total revenue

Ciena Corporation 10-K

107

 
 
 
 
The following table reflects Ciena’s geographic distribution of equipment, furniture and fixtures, with any country 

accounting for greater than 10% of total equipment, furniture and fixtures specifically identified. Equipment, furni-

ture and fixtures attributable to geographic regions outside of the United States and Canada are reflected as “Other 

International.” For the periods below, Ciena’s geographic distribution of equipment, furniture and fixtures was as fol-

lows (in thousands, except percentage data):

United States 

Canada	

Other International 

Total 

2009 

$47,875 

n/a	

13,993 

$61,868 

october 31,

%* 

77.4 

—		

22.6 

100.0 

2010 

$  63,675 

45,103	

11,516 

$120,294 

%*

52.9

37.5

9.6

100.0

n/a	Denotes	equipment,	furniture	and	fixtures	representing	less	than	10%	of	total	equipment,	furniture	and	fixtures
*  Denotes % of total equipment, furniture and fixtures

For the periods below, customers accounting for at least 10% of Ciena’s revenue were as follows (in thousands, except 

percentage data):

AT&T 

BT	

Total 

2008 

$227,737 

113,981	

$341,718 

%* 

25.2 

12.6	

37.8 

FiscaL Year

2009 

$128,233 

n/a	

$128,233 

%* 

19.6 

—	

19.6 

2010 

$267,422 

n/a	

$267,422 

%*

21.6

—

21.6

n/a	Denotes	revenue	representing	less	than	10%	of	total	revenue	for	the	period
*  Denotes % of total revenue

(21)  oTheR emPloyee beneFIT Plans

Effective March 1, 2010, Ciena has a Defined Contribution Pension Plan that covers all of its Canada-based employees 

who are not part of an excluded group. Total contributions (employee and employer) cannot exceed the lesser of 18% 

of participant earnings and an annual dollar limit ($22,450 CAD for 2010). This plan includes a required employer con-

tribution of 1% for all participants and a 50% matching of participant contributions up to a total annual maximum of 

$3,000 CAD per employee. During fiscal 2010, Ciena made matching contributions of approximately $2.5 million.

Ciena has a 401(k) defined contribution profit sharing plan. The plan covers all U.S. based employees who are not 

part of an excluded group. Participants may contribute up to 60% of pre-tax compensation, subject to certain limita-

tions. Effective January 1, 2007, the plan includes an employer matching contribution equal to 50% of the first 6% an 

employee contributes each pay period. Ciena may also make discretionary annual profit contributions up to the IRS 

regulated limit. Ciena has made no profit sharing contributions to date. During fiscal 2008, fiscal 2009, and fiscal 2010, 

Ciena made matching contributions of approximately $3.0 million, $3.2 million and $3.4 million, respectively.

(22)  CommITmenTs anD ConTIngenCIes

Foreign Tax Contingencies

Ciena has received assessment notices from the Mexican tax authorities asserting deficiencies in payments between 

2001 and 2005 related primarily to income taxes and import taxes and duties. Ciena has filed judicial petitions appeal-

ing these assessments. As of October 31, 2009 and 2010, Ciena had accrued liabilities of $1.1 million and $1.4 million, 

respectively, related to these contingencies, which are reported as a component of other current accrued liabilities. As 

of October 31, 2010, Ciena estimates that it could be exposed to possible losses of up to $5.8 million, for which it has 

not accrued liabilities. Ciena has not accrued the additional income tax liabilities because it does not believe that such 

losses are more likely than not to be incurred. Ciena has not accrued the additional import taxes and duties because it 

does not believe the incurrence of such losses are probable. Ciena continues to evaluate the likelihood of probable and 

108

Ciena Corporation 10-K

 
 
 
 
reasonably possible losses, if any, related to these assessments. As a result, future increases or decreases to accrued 

liabilities may be necessary and will be recorded in the period when such amounts are estimable and more likely than 

not (for income taxes) or probable (for non-income taxes).

In addition to the matters described above, Ciena is subject to various tax liabilities arising in the ordinary course of 

business. Ciena does not expect that the ultimate settlement of these liabilities will have a material effect on its results 

of operations, financial position or cash flows.

Operating Lease Commitments

Ciena has certain minimum obligations under non-cancelable operating leases expiring on various dates through 2020 

for equipment and facilities. Future annual minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases at 

October 31, 2010 are as follows (in thousands):

Year eNded october 31,

2011 

2012 

2013 

2014 

2015 

Thereafter 

Total 

$  28,119

22,898

19,993

15,674

12,589

41,067

$140,340 

Rental expense for fiscal 2008, fiscal 2009, and fiscal 2010 was approximately $12.4 million, $14.7 million and $22.2 mil-

lion, respectively. In addition, Ciena paid approximately $1.3 million, $2.2 million and $2.2 million during fiscal 2008, 

fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010, respectively, related to rent costs for restructured facilities and unfavorable lease commit-

ments, which were offset against Ciena’s restructuring liabilities and unfavorable lease obligations. The amount for 

operating lease commitments above does not include insurance, taxes, maintenance and other costs required by the 

applicable operating lease. These costs are variable and are not expected to have a material impact.

Purchase Commitments with Contract Manufacturers and Suppliers

As of October 31, 2010, Ciena has purchase commitments of $283.7 million. Purchase commitments relate to purchase 

order obligations to contract manufacturers and component suppliers for inventory. In certain instances, Ciena is per-

mitted to cancel, reschedule or adjust these orders. Consequently, only a portion of the amount reported as purchase 

commitments relates to firm, non-cancelable and unconditional obligations.

Litigation

On May 29, 2008, Graywire, LLC filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia 

against Ciena and four other defendants, alleging, among other things, that certain of the parties’ products infringe 

U.S. Patent 6,542,673 (the “‘673 Patent”), relating to an identifier system and components for optical assemblies. The 

complaint, which seeks injunctive relief and damages, was served upon Ciena on January 20, 2009. Ciena filed an 

answer to the complaint and counterclaims against Graywire on March 26, 2009, and an amended answer and counter-

claims on April 17, 2009. On April 27, 2009, Ciena and certain other defendants filed an application for inter partes reex-

amination of the ‘673 Patent with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (the “PTO”). On the same date, Ciena and the 

other defendants filed a motion to stay the case pending reexamination of all of the patents-in-suit. On July 17, 2009, 

the district court granted the defendants’ motion to stay the case. On July 23, 2009, the PTO granted the defendants’ 

application for reexamination with respect to certain claims of the ‘673 Patent. Ciena believes that it has valid defenses 

to the lawsuit and intends to defend it vigorously in the event the stay of the case is lifted.

As a result of our June 2002 merger with ONI Systems Corp., we became a defendant in a securities class action lawsuit 

filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in August 2001. The complaint named 

ONI, certain former ONI officers, and certain underwriters of ONI’s initial public offering (IPO) as defendants, and 

Ciena Corporation 10-K

109

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
alleges, among other things, that the underwriter defendants violated the securities laws by failing to disclose alleged 

compensation arrangements (such as undisclosed commissions or stock stabilization practices) in ONI’s registration 

statement and by engaging in manipulative practices to artificially inflate ONI’s stock price after the IPO. The complaint 

also alleges that ONI and the named former officers violated the securities laws by failing to disclose the underwriters’ 

alleged compensation arrangements and manipulative practices. No specific amount of damages has been claimed. 

Similar complaints have been filed against more than 300 other issuers that have had initial public offerings since 1998, 

and all of these actions have been included in a single coordinated proceeding. The former ONI officers have been 

dismissed from the action without prejudice. In July 2004, following mediated settlement negotiations, the plain-

tiffs, the issuer defendants (including Ciena), and their insurers entered into a settlement agreement. The settlement 

agreement did not require Ciena to pay any amount toward the settlement or to make any other payments. While the 

partial settlement was pending approval, the plaintiffs continued to litigate their cases against the underwriter defen-

dants. In October 2004, the district court certified a class with respect to the Section 10(b) claims in six “focus cases” 

selected out of all of the consolidated cases, which cases did not include Ciena, and which decision was appealed 

by the underwriter defendants to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. On February 15, 2005, the district 

court granted the motion for preliminary approval of the settlement agreement, subject to certain modifications, and 

on August 31, 2005, the district court issued a preliminary order approving the revised stipulated settlement agree-

ment. On December 5, 2006, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated the district court’s grant of class 

certification in the six focus cases. On April 6, 2007, the Second Circuit denied plaintiffs’ petition for rehearing. In light 

of the Second Circuit’s decision, the parties agreed that the settlement could not be approved. On June 25, 2007, the 

district court approved a stipulation filed by the plaintiffs and the issuer defendants terminating the proposed settle-

ment. On August 14, 2007, the plaintiffs filed second amended complaints against the defendants in the six focus cases. 

On September 27, 2007, the plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification based on their amended complaints and 

allegations. On March 26, 2008, the district court denied motions to dismiss the second amended complaints filed by 

the defendants in the six focus cases, except as to Section 11 claims raised by those plaintiffs who sold their securities 

for a price in excess of the initial offering price and those who purchased outside the previously certified class period. 

Briefing on the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification in the focus cases was completed in May 2008. That motion was 

withdrawn without prejudice on October 10, 2008. On April 2, 2009, a stipulation and agreement of settlement between 

the plaintiffs, issuer defendants and underwriter defendants was submitted to the Court for preliminary approval. The 

Court granted the plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary approval and preliminarily certified the settlement classes on June 10, 

2009. The settlement fairness hearing was held on September 10, 2009. On October 6, 2009, the Court entered an opinion 

granting final approval to the settlement and directing that the Clerk of the Court close these actions. Notices of appeal of 

the opinion granting final approval have been filed. Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation and because the settle-

ment remains subject to appeal, the ultimate outcome of the matter is uncertain.

In addition to the matters described above, Ciena is subject to various legal proceedings, claims and litigation arising 

in the ordinary course of business. Ciena does not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a 

material effect on its results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

(23)  subsequenT eVenTs

Ciena performed an evaluation of events that have occurred subsequent to the end of its fiscal year through the date 

that the consolidated financial statements were issued. Except as described below, there have been no subsequent 

events that occurred that would require disclosure in the consolidated financial statements.

Carling Lease

On December 15, 2010, in connection with the sale of its Carling campus to Publics Works and Government Services 

Canada (PWGSC), Nortel notified Ciena of the exercise of its early termination rights with respect to the Carling lease. 

The effect of this early termination election is the shortening of the Carling lease term from ten years to five years. In 

connection with this notification, Ciena received a refund of $33.5 million from the escrowed cash consideration Ciena 

paid as part of the MEN Acquisition. This early termination of the Carling lease results in a reduction of approximately 

$38.5 million to the aggregate amount relating to Ciena’s minimum obligations under non-cancelable operating leases 

110

Ciena Corporation 10-K

at October 31, 2010 set forth in Note 22 above. Ciena recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 a $3.3 million gain asso-

ciated with the change in fair value of this contingent consideration based on the final consideration received.

ITem 9.   Changes In anD DIsagReemenTs WITh aCCounTanTs  

on aCCounTIng anD FInanCIal DIsClosuRe

None.

ITem 9a.  ConTRols anD PRoCeDuRes

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the par-

ticipation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of our disclosure controls 

and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). 

Based upon this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure con-

trols and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under 

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) during the most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially 

affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

As described elsewhere in this report, we acquired the MEN Business on March 19, 2010. We are in the process of inte-

grating the MEN Business and we currently rely on services provided through an affiliate of Nortel under a transition 

services agreement to support, among other purposes, certain control activities of the MEN Business. Such services 

commenced during our second fiscal quarter and initially impacted our internal controls over financial reporting dur-

ing that period. As a result, we have not fully evaluated the internal control over financial reporting of certain activities 

of the MEN Business. Specifically, as permitted by SEC rules and regulations, we excluded from our evaluation of the 

effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting from our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year 

ended October 31, 2010 those activities of the MEN Business being performed under the transition service agreement. 

The process of integrating the MEN Business into our evaluation of internal control over financial reporting may result 

in future changes to our internal control over financial reporting. The MEN Business will be part of our evaluation of the 

effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ending 

October 31, 2011, in which report we will be initially required to include the MEN Business in our annual assessment.

Ciena Corporation 10-K

111

Report of management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The management of Ciena Corporation is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over 

financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).

The internal control over financial reporting at Ciena Corporation was designed to provide reasonable assurance 

regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accor-

dance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Internal control over financial 

reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

•	 pertain	to	the	maintenance	of	records	that,	in	reasonable	detail,	accurately	and	fairly	reflect	the	transactions	and	

dispositions	of	the	assets	of	Ciena	Corporation;

•	 provide	reasonable	assurance	that	transactions	are	recorded	as	necessary	to	permit	preparation	of	financial	state-

ments	in	accordance	with	accounting	principles	generally	accepted	in	the	United	States	of	America;

•	 provide	reasonable	assurance	that	receipts	and	expenditures	of	Ciena	Corporation	are	being	made	only	in	accor-

dance	with	authorization	of	management	and	directors	of	Ciena	Corporation;	and

•	 provide	reasonable	assurance	regarding	prevention	or	timely	detection	of	unauthorized	acquisition,	use	or	dispo-

sition of assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.

Management of Ciena Corporation assessed the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial report-

ing as of October 31, 2010. Management based this assessment on criteria for effective internal control over financial 

reporting described in “Internal Control—Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations 

of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management determined that, as of October 31, 2010, Ciena 

Corporation maintained effective internal control over financial reporting. Management reviewed the results of its 

assessment with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.

In accordance with guidance issued by the SEC, companies are permitted to exclude acquisitions from their assessment 

of internal controls over financial reporting during the year of the acquisition while integrating the acquired operations. 

Management’s evaluation of internal control over financial reporting excluded certain activities of the MEN Business, 

which Ciena Corporation acquired on March 19, 2010. The MEN Business accounted for $530.9 million, or 43% of total 

revenue, for the year ended October 31, 2010. The portion of the MEN Business excluded for purposes of manage-

ment’s evaluation of internal control over financial reporting represented approximately $427.8 million, or 20% of total 

assets as of October 31, 2010.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, who audited and reported on the con-

solidated financial statements of Ciena Corporation included in this annual report, has also audited the effectiveness 

of Ciena Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2010, as stated in its report appearing 

under Item 8 of Part II of this annual report.

/s/	Gary	B.	Smith

Gary B. Smith

President and Chief Executive Officer

December 22, 2010

/s/	James	E.	Moylan,	Jr.

James E. Moylan, Jr.

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

December 22, 2010

112

Ciena Corporation 10-K

ITem 9b.  oTheR InFoRmaTIon
None.

Ciena Corporation 10-K

113

PaRT III

ITem 10.   DIReCToRs, eXeCuTIVe oFFICeRs anD CoRPoRaTe goVeRnanCe
Pursuant to General Instruction G(3) of Form 10-K, information relating to Ciena’s directors and executive officers is set 

forth in Part I of this annual report under the caption Item 1. “Business—Directors and Executive Officers.”

Additional information concerning our Audit Committee and regarding compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange 

Act responsive to this item is incorporated herein by reference to Ciena’s definitive proxy statement with respect to our 

2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by 

this Form 10-K.

As part of our system of corporate governance, our board of directors has adopted a code of ethics that is specifically 

applicable to our chief executive officer and senior financial officers. This Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, as 

well as our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, applicable to all directors, officers and employees, are available on 

the	corporate	governance	page	of	our	web	site	at	http://www.ciena.com.	We	intend	to	satisfy	any	disclosure	require-

ment under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding an amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of the Code of Ethics for 

Senior Financial Officers, by posting such information on our web site at the address above.

ITem 11.  eXeCuTIVe ComPensaTIon
Information responsive to this item is incorporated herein by reference to Ciena’s definitive proxy statement with 

respect to our 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the fiscal 

year covered by this Form 10-K.

ITem 12.   seCuRITy oWneRshIP oF CeRTaIn beneFICIal oWneRs anD 
managemenT anD RelaTeD sToCKholDeR maTTeRs

Information responsive to this item is incorporated herein by reference to Ciena’s definitive proxy statement with 

respect to our 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the fiscal 

year covered by this Form 10-K.

ITem 13.   CeRTaIn RelaTIonshIPs anD RelaTeD TRansaCTIons, anD 

DIReCToR InDePenDenCe

Information responsive to this item is incorporated herein by reference to Ciena’s definitive proxy statement with 

respect to our 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the fiscal 

year covered by this Form 10-K.

ITem 14.  PRInCIPal aCCounTanT Fees anD seRVICes
Information responsive to this item is incorporated herein by reference to Ciena’s definitive proxy statement with 

respect to our 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the fiscal 

year covered by this Form 10-K.

114

Ciena Corporation 10-K

PaRT IV

ITem 15.  eXhIbITs anD FInanCIal sTaTemenT sCheDules
(a) 

1.  The information required by this item is included in Item 8 of Part II of this annual report.

2.  The information required by this item is included in Item 8 of Part II of this annual report.

3.  Exhibits: See Index to Exhibits, which is incorporated by reference in this Item. The Exhibits listed in the 

accompanying Index to Exhibits are filed or incorporated by reference as part of this annual report. 

(b) 

Exhibits. See Index to Exhibits, which is incorporated by reference in this Item. The Exhibits listed in the accompa-

nying Index to Exhibits are filed or incorporated by reference as part of this annual report.

(c)  Not applicable.

Ciena Corporation 10-K

115

sIgnaTuRes

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly 

caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on the 22nd day of 

December 2010.

Ciena Corporation

By:	/s/	Gary	B.	Smith

Gary B. Smith

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the follow-

ing persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.

sigNatures 

titLe 

date

/s/	Patrick	H.	Nettles,	Ph.D.	

Executive	Chairman	of	the	Board	of	Directors	

December	22,	2010

Patrick H. Nettles, Ph.D.

/s/	Gary	B.	Smith	

Gary B. Smith

(Principal Executive Officer)

President,	Chief	Executive	Officer	and	Director	

December	22,	2010

/s/	James	E.	Moylan,	Jr.	

Sr.	Vice	President,	Finance	and	Chief	Financial	Officer	

December	22,	2010

James E. Moylan, Jr.

(Principal Financial Officer)

/s/	Andrew	C.	Petrik	

Andrew C. Petrik

(Principal Accounting Officer)

Vice	President,	Controller	

December	22,	2010

/s/	Stephen	P.	Bradley,	Ph.D.	

Director	

December	22,	2010

Stephen P. Bradley, Ph.D.

/s/	Harvey	B.	Cash	

Harvey B. Cash

/s/	Bruce	L.	Claflin	

Bruce L. Claflin

/s/	Lawton	W.	Fitt	

Lawton W. Fitt

Director	

Director	

Director	

December	22,	2010

December	22,	2010

December	22,	2010

/s/	Patrick	T.	Gallagher	

Director	

December	22,	2010

Patrick T. Gallagher

/s/	Judith	M.	O’Brien	

Director	

December	22,	2010

Judith M. O’Brien

/s/	Michael	J.	Rowny	

Director	

December	22,	2010

Michael J. Rowny

116

Ciena Corporation 10-K

corporate information

CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS

OPERATING EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

OUTSIDE BOARD MEMBERS

Patrick H. Nettles, Ph.D.
Executive Chairman of the Board of 
Directors

Stephen P. Bradley, Ph.D.
Baker Foundation Professor
Harvard Business School

Gary B. Smith 
President, Chief Executive Officer  
and Director 

Harvey B. Cash 
General Partner 
InterWest Partners                                                 

Stephen B. Alexander 
Chief Technology Officer; Senior Vice 
President, Products and Technology 

Bruce L. Claflin    
Chairman 
AMD Corporation   

Lawton W. Fitt  
Retired Partner  
Goldman Sachs

Patrick T. Gallagher 
Chairman 
Ubiquisys Ltd.

Judith M. O’Brien 
Former Executive Vice President  
General Counsel  
Obopay, Inc.

Michael J. Rowny 
Chairman 
Rowny Capital

Michael G. Aquino 
Senior Vice President  
Global Field Operations

James Frodsham 
Senior Vice President  
Chief Strategy Officer

Philippe Morin 
Senior Vice President 
Global Products Group

James E. Moylan, Jr. 
Chief Financial Officer  
Senior Vice President, Finance 

Andrew C. Petrik 
Vice President and Controller

David M. Rothenstein 
Senior Vice President  
General Counsel and Secretary 

Ciena Corporation
1201 Winterson Road
Linthicum, MD 21090-2205
Telephone: (800) 921-1144
or (410) 865-8500
www.Ciena.com

ANNUAL MEETING
Ciena’s annual meeting of shareholders 
will be held at 3:00 PM (Eastern) on 
Wednesday, March 23, 2011 at The 
Westin Baltimore Washington Airport, 
1110 Old Elkridge Landing Road,  
Baltimore, MD.

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED  
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Pricewaterouse Coopers LLP
Baltimore, MD

LEGAL COUNSEL
Hogan Lovells US LLP 
Baltimore, MD

TRANSFER AGENT
Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
P.O. Box 43078
Providence, RI 02940-3078
Shareholder Inquiries: (781) 575-2879
www.Computershare.com

COMMON STOCK MARKET DATA
Since its initial public offering on 
February 7, 1997, Ciena’s Common 
Stock has traded on the Nasdaq Stock 
Market under the symbol CIEN.

INVESTOR RELATIONS
For additional copies of this report or 
other financial information, contact: 
Investor Relations
Ciena Corporation
1201 Winterson Road
Linthicum, MD 21090-2205
Telephone: (888) 243-6223
or (410) 694-5700

Additional information is available on 
Ciena’s website at www.Ciena.com.

m
o
c
.
e
v
i
t
a
e
r
c
i
c
f
.

w
w
w

D
M

,
a
d
s
e
h
t
e
B

.
c
n

I

s
n
o

i
t
a
c
i

n
u
m
m
o
C

l
a
i
c
n
a
n

i
F

:

n
g

i
s
e
D

n
o

i
t
a
r
o
p
r
o
C
a
n
e
i

C
1
1
0
2
©

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
002CSI0818

: the network specialist

1201 WINTERSON ROAD, LINTHICUM, MARYLAND 21090-2205      (410) 865-8500   (800) 921-1144       WWW.CIENA.COM