Quarterlytics / Energy / Oil & Gas Exploration & Production / Civitas Resources / FY2013 Annual Report

Civitas Resources
Annual Report 2013

CIVI · NYSE Energy
Claim this profile
Ticker CIVI
Exchange NYSE
Sector Energy
Industry Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Employees 201-500
← All annual reports
FY2013 Annual Report · Civitas Resources
Loading PDF…
FOCUSED
PURSUIT

2013 ANNUAL REPORT

Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc. 

is an independent oil and natural gas company 

engaged in the acquisition, exploration, 

 development and production of onshore oil and 

associated liquids-rich natural gas in the United 

States. The Company’s assets and operations are 

concentrated primarily in the Rocky Mountains 

in the Wattenberg Field, focused on the Niobrara 

and Codell formations, and in southern Arkansas, 

focused on the oily Cotton Valley sands.

Comparison of 2-Year Cumulative Total Return*

$450

$400

$350

$300

$250

$200

$150

$100

$50

$0

Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc.

S&P 500

S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index

*$100 invested on 12/31/2011 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends. 
Fiscal year ending December 31.

Copyright © 2014 S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, a part of McGrawHill Financial. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2014 State Street Corporation. All rights reserved. 

450

400

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

OPERATING AND FINANCIAL DATA

OPERATING DATA

Year-End Proved Reserves

Crude Oil (MBbls)
Natural Gas (MMcf)
NGLs (MBbls)
Total (MBoe)

Sales Volumes

Total (Boe/d)
% Oil
% Natural Gas
% NGLs

Average Sales Price (BEFORE THE EFFECTS OF HEDGING)

Crude Oil (per Bbl)
Natural Gas (per Mcf)
Natural Gas Liquids (per Bbl)
Crude Oil Equivalent (per Boe)

FINANCIAL DATA (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE AND PERCENTAGE DATA)

Revenues
Net Income
Earnings per Share Diluted
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Total Assets
Total Debt
Stockholders’ Equity

Total Debt-to-Book Capital Ratio
Weighted Average Shares Diluted

2013

2012

43,546
139,614
2,936
 69,751 

30,159
118,548
3,107
53,024

 16,172 

9,257

66%
28%
6%

65%
27%
8%

$ 

 91.84 
 4.66 
 51.74 
 71.45 

$   421,860 
 69,184 
 1.71 
 307,015 
 1,545,935 
542,880
 656,028 

$ 

89.08
3.62
55.54
68.12

$  231,205
46,523
1.17
 157,636 
  1,002,490
 191,272 
578,518

45%

 39,404 

25%

 39,052 

Note:  Year-end proved reserves include discontinued operations, while all other amounts reflect results for continuing operations and exclude 
results for discontinued operations. Bonanza Creek began the divestiture process of its California properties in the second quarter 2012, 
with one property remaining to be sold as of December 31, 2013.

2013 Cash Margin/Boe

2013 CAPEX $461 Million

100

80

60

40

20

0

72% Cash Margin

11% LOE
10% Cash G&A
7% Production Taxes

Average sales price for a barrel of oil 
equivalent before effects of hedging: $71.45

80% Rockies

20% Mid-Continent

100

80

60

40

20

0

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC.     PAGE 01      2013 ANNUAL REPORT

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EXECUTION IS EVERYTHING

Two things are necessary for strong, consistent operational 
performance: quality assets and dedicated people. At 
Bonanza Creek, we have both. Each is foundational to our 
philosophy that dependability and transparency builds trust, 
and trust ultimately leads to value. 

Our strategy is to prudently pursue top tier growth rates by 
accelerating the horizontal development of the Niobrara and 
Codell formations in the Wattenberg Field, today one of the 
premier oil resource plays in the United States. Together with 
Arkansas, we forecast increasing production by approximately 
50% over 2013. We can accomplish this strong volume 
growth while maintaining a solid balance sheet, enviable 
liquidity and a robust drilling inventory.

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC.     PAGE 02       FOCUSED PURSUIT

accelerating

value

We create shareholder value through organic growth, strategic acquisitions and 

the application of the latest technology to extract oil and natural gas resources.

Bonanza Creek operates in two core 
areas: Wattenberg Field in Colorado 
and Dorcheat-Macedonia Field in 
southern Arkansas. These two areas 
accounted for substantially all of our 
estimated net proved reserves at 
year-end 2013. 

In 2013, Bonanza Creek drilled  
87 gross horizontal wells in the 
Wattenberg Field targeting the 

Niobrara B Bench, C Bench and 
Codell formation. We also drilled  
47 gross wells in Arkansas, including 
nine wells testing five acre spacing. 
Fourth quarter average net daily 
production increased 75% over 
fourth quarter 2012 to approximately 
21 MBoe/d. As of December 31, 2013, 
Bonanza Creek had identified over 
1,800 drilling locations in our core 
areas providing the Company with  

15 years of inventory at the current 
pace of development. 

Company production for 2013 
totaled 5.9 MMBoe (65% oil), an 
increase of 72% as compared to  
3.4 MMBoe produced in 2012. In 
addition, Bonanza Creek’s proved 
reserves increased 32% in 2013,  
to 69.8 MMBoe.

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY RECEIVES ACG DENVER’S 2014  
CORPORATE GROWTH AWARD

Production [Boe/d]

16,172

16172

Natural Gas

Oil & NGLs

9,257

4,382

2,121 2,602

1,547

618

12129

72%

4043

8086

Production CAGR 

’07

’08

’09

’10

’11

’12

’13

since 2007

0

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC.     PAGE 03      2013 ANNUAL REPORT

 
ANOTHER TRANSFORMATIONAL YEAR

Discovered in 1970, the Wattenberg Field was one of the first 
places where hydraulic fracturing was performed routinely 
and successfully on thousands of wells. Originally a vertical 
development with over 20,000 producing wells, the field  
has been revitalized into a major oil resource play through  
the application of horizontal drilling. In 2013, Bonanza Creek  
was the third largest operator by activity and an important 
contributor to an enhanced understanding of the field’s  
vast potential. 

Bonanza Creek has the technical sophistication and the 
financial resources to keep up with the rapid pace of change 
in this field. Highly leveraged to the expansion and success  
of the Niobrara and Codell formations, where wells are 
increasingly being drilled tighter and longer, we are uniquely 
situated to benefit from further development.

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC.     PAGE 04       FOCUSED PURSUIT

strategic

resource development

We are aggressively bringing forward value by drilling at tighter spacing and 

with longer laterals in order to maximize recovery and capital efficiency.

Bonanza Creek has increased pro-
duction in the Rocky Mountains by 
over 500% in two years primarily 
because the Niobrara B Bench has 
proven to be a tremendous resource 
and tailor made for horizontal drill-
ing. The next years of dramatic 
growth potential will increasingly 
come from the Niobrara C Bench 

and the Codell formation. With 
nearly 1,000 remaining locations in 
those two target layers, we are well 
positioned to extract significant 
additional resources and achieve top 
tier growth and economic returns.

MMBoe primarily as a result of 
increased EURs in the Niobrara C 
Bench and Codell. We also increased 
inventory by 20% due to acreage 
additions and increased confidence 
in our assets.

3P reserves in the Wattenberg Field 
increased 30% over 2012 to 308 

Niobrara B

Niobrara C

Codell

We have drilled nearly 100 wells since 2011 in 
the Niobrara B Bench. Results track our 313 
MBoe type curve with a strong crude oil weight-
ing. We have increased our well density to 40 
acres and are testing the optimal lateral length.

We have drilled five wells in the Niobrara C 
Bench with results tracking within the range  
of our standard Niobrara B Bench wells. We are 
testing downspaced stacking arrangements 
with the Niobrara B Bench and will drill an 
extended reach lateral in 2014.

We have drilled five wells in the Codell with 
results coming in above our expectations for 
the Niobrara. In 2014, we are testing the expan-
sion of our Codell potential to thinner pay 
zones on the eastern portion of our acreage.

Wattenberg Field - Expanding Resource Recovery

Niobrara A

Niobrara B

Niobrara C

Codell

308

MMBoe

Net HZ Risked 3P Reserves in the Wattenberg Field

(not including Niobrara A Bench)

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC.     PAGE 05      2013 ANNUAL REPORT

DEAR FELLOW STOCKHOLDER

“We are proud to have delivered 

 tremendous operating and financial 

results in 2013 validating our assets and 

our ability to perform at a high level.

Today, Bonanza Creek is firing on all 

 cylinders, continuously improving  

our technical capabilities and getting 

more from the rock.”

56%

Increase in Stock Value

75%82%

Increase in Production

Increase in Revenue

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC.     PAGE 06      FOCUSED PURSUIT

When I joined Bonanza Creek as a board member in 2011, it was 
clear  to  me  that  the  company  was  at  an  inflection  point.  The 
implications of applying horizontal technology to the Wattenberg 
Field were just beginning to be understood and appreciated, and 
I  was  intrigued  by  the  enormous  potential  that  existed  in  that 
little company. Over the subsequent years the team has turned 
potential  into  reality  and  increased  production  in  the  Rocky 
Mountain region by over 500% since the fourth quarter of 2011. 
I’m  proud  to  say  that  Bonanza  Creek  has  become  a  significant 
player in the Wattenberg Field renaissance and that success has 
translated  into  an  appreciation  in  stock  value  of  nearly  300% 
since January 2012. 

Today,  Bonanza  Creek  is  the  third  largest  operator  by  drilling 
activity in the Wattenberg Field and the largest oil producer in 
the state of Arkansas. We are embarking on the largest capital 
program in our history, investing approximately $600 million in 
2014  to  achieve  year-over-year  production  growth  of  50%. 
Integral  to  our  dramatic  growth  in  investment  and  production 
are the members of our team, 70% of whom have joined us in 
just  the  past  two  years.  We  are  fortunate  to  have  talented 
professionals  at  every  level  of  the  organization  striving  for 
excellence and dedicated to increasing shareholder value. 

our  ability  to  perform  at  a  high  level.  Today,  Bonanza  Creek  is 
firing  on  all  cylinders,  continuously  improving  our  technical 
capabilities  and  getting  more  from  the  rock.  We  continue  to 
increase  reserve  potential  and  economic  returns  from  our 
concentrated  positions  through  downspacing,  longer  laterals 
and the development of multiple productive pay zones. 

We  are  carrying  significant  momentum  into  2014  and  I  am 
confident that we have the right strategy in place to consistently 
deliver  profitable  growth.  We  aim  to  maximize  the  assets  we 
currently have while pursuing aggressive growth that leverages 
our  formidable  operational  and  financial  capabilities.  I  expect 
more of the same this year from Bonanza Creek: execution and 
operational  excellence,  a  strong  balance  sheet  and  a  sterling 
record of safety and environmental stewardship.

On behalf of the board of directors, management and employees 
of Bonanza Creek, thank you for your support. 

Sincerely,

Indeed,  creating  value  is  the  driving  force  within  our 
organization.  We  are  proud  to  have  delivered  tremendous 
operating and financial results in 2013, validating our assets and 

Marvin M. Chronister 

Interim President & Chief Executive Officer

80000

70000

60000

50000

40000

30000

20000

10000

0

Proved Reserves [MBoe]

Revenues [in thousands]

69,751

$421,860

53,024

43,713

32,860

$231,205

$105,724

$43,506

’10

’11

’12

’13

’10

’11

’12

’13

Oil & NGLs

Natural Gas

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC.     PAGE 07      2013 ANNUAL REPORT

500000

400000

300000

200000

100000

0

 
  
OUR COMMITMENT TO COMMUNITY

Being an energetic and committed corporate citizen is one  
of our most important values. Essential to that commitment 
are safe and environmentally responsible operations. We live 
where we work and we care about our  neighbors and the  
land entrusted to us. Domestic energy development is crucial 
to America’s continued prosperity and we’re proud to be a 
substantial contributor.

Another integral element of being a good neighbor is sup-
porting our communities with our time and resources. In 
2013, when Colorado was affected by devastating flooding, 
our team was there to help those in need. We  also continued 
our corporate giving efforts to priorities that include K-12 
education initiatives and the reduction of  poverty and home-
lessness in our communities. 

Entering 2014, we are excited to increase our level of engage-
ment through our Energy for Giving  program, which will allocate 
corporate giving to strategic priorities, provide additional 
leverage to our employees’ contributions, and continue the 
funding of local initiatives.

CRED COLORADANS 

FOR RESPONSIBLE 
ENERGY DEVELOPMENT

www.cred.org

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC.     PAGE 08      FOCUSED PURSUIT

2013 FORM 10-K

This line represents final trim and will not print

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

(cid:2) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT  TO  SECTION 13  OR 15(d) OF  THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF  1934

For the  fiscal year ended December 31, 2013

OR

(cid:3) TRANSITION REPORT  PURSUANT  TO  SECTION  13 OR 15(d)  OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number: 001-35371

Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

410  17th Street, Suite 1400  Denver,  Colorado
(Address of principal executive  offices)

61-1630631
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

80202
(Zip Code)

(720) 440-6100
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

(Title of Class)

(Name of Exchange)

Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share

New York Stock Exchange

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities

Act.  Yes (cid:2) No (cid:3)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the

Act. Yes  (cid:3) No  (cid:2)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  (cid:2) No (cid:3)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,

every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S T (§ 232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes (cid:2) No (cid:3)

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by
reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  (cid:2)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a
smaller reporting company. See the definitions of ‘‘large accelerated filer’’, ‘‘accelerated filer’’ and ‘‘smaller reporting company’’
in  Rule  12b-2 of  the Exchange  Act.
Large accelerated  filer (cid:2) Accelerated filer  (cid:3)

Smaller reporting company (cid:3)

Non-accelerated filer (cid:3)
(Do not check if a
smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes  (cid:3) No (cid:2)

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates on June 28,
2013, based upon the closing price of $35.46 of the registrant’s common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange,
was approximately $847,821,792. Excludes approximately 16,377,774 shares of the registrant’s common stock held by executive
officers, directors and stockholders that the registrant has concluded, solely for the purpose of the foregoing calculation, were
affiliates of the registrant.

Number of shares of registrant’s common stock outstanding as of February 24, 2014: 40,267,540

Documents Incorporated By Reference:

Portions of the  registrant’s definitive proxy statement for its 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed with

the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of December 31, 2013, are incorporated by reference into Part III of
this report for the year ended December 31, 2013.

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC.
FORM 10-K
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,  2013

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Glossary of Certain Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PART I
Item 1.
Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 1A. Risk Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 2.
Item 3.
Legal Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related  Stockholder  Matters and  Issuer

PART II

Purchases of Equity Securities

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Selected Financial Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 6.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion  and  Analysis of Financial Condition  and Results of

Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative  Disclosure about  Market Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financial Statements and  Supplementary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 8.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on  Accounting  and Financial
Item 9.

Disclosure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 9B. Other Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers  and Corporate Governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 11. Executive Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain  Beneficial  Owners and Management and Related

Stockholder  Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 13. Certain Relationships and  Related Transactions, and Director  Independence . . . . . . . .
Principal Accountant Fees and Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 14.
PART IV

iv

1
29
52
52
53
53

53
55

57
75
77

112
112
115

115
115

115
115
115

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

116

i

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains various statements, including those  that  express belief,

expectation or intention, as well as those that are not  statements of historic fact,  that  are forward-
looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities  Act  of  1933, as amended, and
Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934,  as amended. When used in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K, the words ‘‘could,’’ ‘‘believe,’’  ‘‘anticipate,’’ ‘‘intend,’’ ‘‘estimate,’’ ‘‘expect,’’
‘‘may,’’ ‘‘continue,’’ ‘‘predict,’’ ‘‘potential,’’  ‘‘project,’’  ‘‘plan’’ ‘‘will,’’ and similar expressions  are intended
to identify forward-looking statements, although not all  forward-looking statements contain such
identifying  words.

Forward-looking statements include statements related to, among other things:

• reserves estimates;

• estimated production for 2014;

• amount and allocation of forecasted capital expenditures  and plans  for funding capital

expenditures and operating expenses;

• ability to modify future capital expenditures;

• the Wattenberg Field being the most prospective area of the Niobrara formation and the

Dorcheat Macedonia Field being a primary focus in  the Mid-Continent region;

• compliance with debt covenants;

• ability to satisfy obligations related  to  ongoing operations;

• compliance with government regulations;

• adequacy of gathering systems and impact from  the lack of  available gathering systems and

processing facilities in certain areas;

• natural gas, oil and NGL prices and  factors affecting the volatility  of  such prices;

• impact of lower commodity prices;

• the ability to use derivative instruments to manage commodity price risk;

• plans to drill or participate in wells including the intent  to  focus in specific areas or  formations;

• loss of any purchaser of our products;

• our estimated revenues and losses;

• the timing and success of specific projects;

• intentions with respect to acquisitions  and  divestitures;

• intentions with respect to working interest percentages;

• management and technical team;

• outcomes and effects of litigation,  claims  and disputes;

• our business strategy;

• our ability to replace oil and natural gas  reserves;

• impact of recently issued accounting pronouncements;

• our financial position;

ii

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

• our cash flow and liquidity; and

• other statements concerning our operations,  economic performance and financial  condition.

We  have based these forward-looking statements on certain assumptions and  analyses we have

made in light of our experience and  our perception of historical  trends, current conditions  and
expected future developments as well as  other  factors we believe are appropriate under  the
circumstances. They can be affected by  inaccurate assumptions or by known or unknown  risks  and
uncertainties. Many such factors will be important in  determining actual future results.  The actual
results or developments anticipated by  these forward-looking statements are subject to a number of
risks and uncertainties, many of which  are  beyond our control, and may not be realized or, even if
substantially realized, may not have the expected consequences. Actual results could differ materially
from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. Factors  that  could  cause actual
results to differ materially include, but are not limited to, the following:

• the risk factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A  of this  Annual Report on Form 10-K;

• declines or volatility in the prices we receive  for our oil, liquids and natural  gas;

• general economic conditions, whether internationally, nationally  or  in the  regional and local

market areas in which we do business;

• the continuing global economic slowdown that has and may continue to adversely affect

consumption of oil and natural gas by  businesses and  consumers;

• ability of our customers to meet their obligations to us;

• our ability to generate sufficient cash flow  from operations,  borrowings or other  sources  to

enable us to fully develop our undeveloped acreage positions;

• the presence or recoverability of estimated  oil and natural gas reserves and the actual future

production rates and associated costs;

• uncertainties associated with estimates of proved  oil and gas reserves and, in particular, probable

and possible resources;

• the possibility that the industry may  be  subject to future local, state, and federal  regulatory or

legislative actions (including additional taxes  and changes in environmental  regulation);

• environmental risks;

• seasonal weather conditions and lease stipulations;

• drilling and operating risks, including the risks associated  with the employment of horizontal

drilling  techniques;

• ability to acquire adequate supplies of water for drilling and  completion operations;

• availability of oilfield equipment, services and personnel;

• exploration and development risks;

• competition in the oil and natural gas industry;

• management’s ability to execute our  plans  to  meet  our goals;

• risks related to our derivative instruments;

• our ability to attract and retain key  members of our senior  management and key technical

employees;

• ability to maintain effective internal controls;

iii

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

• access to adequate gathering systems and pipeline take-away capacity to provide adequate

infrastructure for the products of our  drilling program;

• our ability to secure firm transportation for  oil and natural  gas we produce  and to sell the oil

and natural gas at  market prices;

• costs and other risks associated with perfecting title for mineral rights in some of our properties;

• continued hostilities in the Middle East  and  other  sustained military campaigns or acts of

terrorism or sabotage; and

• other economic, competitive, governmental, legislative, regulatory, geopolitical and technological

factors that may negatively impact our businesses, operations or  pricing.

All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date  of  this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  We
disclaim any obligation to update or  revise these  statements unless required by law, and  you should not
place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Although  we  believe  that  our  plans,
intentions and expectations reflected  in or suggested  by  the forward-looking statements  we make in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K are reasonable, we can  give no  assurance that these plans, intentions or
expectations will be achieved. We disclose  important factors that could cause our actual results to differ
materially from our expectations under Item  1A. Risk Factors and Item 7.  Management’s  Discussion  and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and elsewhere in this Annual Report  on
Form 10-K. These cautionary  statements qualify all forward-looking statements  attributable to us or
persons acting on our behalf.

GLOSSARY OF OIL AND NATURAL GAS  TERMS

We have included below the definitions for certain terms  used in this Annual  Report on

Form 10-K:

‘‘3-D seismic data’’ Geophysical data that  depict  the subsurface strata in three dimensions.

3-D seismic data typically provide a more detailed and accurate interpretation of the subsurface strata
than  2-D, or two-dimensional, seismic data.

‘‘Analogous  reservoir’’ Analogous reservoirs,  as used in resources assessments,  have similar rock and
fluid properties, reservoir conditions (depth, temperature, and pressure) and drive mechanisms, but are
typically  at a more advanced stage of  development than the reservoir of interest  and thus may provide
concepts to assist in the interpretation  of more limited data and estimation of recovery.  When used to
support proved reserves, an ‘‘analogous  reservoir’’  refers to  a  reservoir that shares  the following
characteristics with the reservoir of interest:

(i) Same geological formation (but not  necessarily  in pressure  communication with the  reservoir

of interest);

(ii) Same environment of deposition;

(iii) Similar geological structure; and

(iv) Same drive mechanism.

‘‘Bbl’’ One barrel, or 42 U.S. gallons liquid volume, used herein in  reference to crude oil,

condensate or natural gas liquids.

‘‘Bcf’’ One billion cubic feet of natural gas.

‘‘Boe’’ One stock tank barrel of oil equivalent, calculated by converting natural gas volumes  to

equivalent oil barrels at a ratio of six Mcf to one Bbl of oil.

iv

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

‘‘British thermal unit’’ or ‘‘BTU’’ The  heat required to raise the temperature of a one-pound mass

of water from 58.5 to 59.5 degrees Fahrenheit.

‘‘Basin’’ A large natural depression on the earth’s surface in  which sediments generally brought  by

water accumulate.

‘‘Completion’’ The process of treating a drilled well followed by the installation of permanent
equipment for the production of crude oil or natural  gas, or in the case of a  dry  hole,  the reporting of
abandonment to the appropriate agency.

‘‘Condensate’’ A mixture of hydrocarbons  that exists in the gaseous  phase at original reservoir
temperature and pressure, but that, when produced, is in the liquid  phase at  surface  pressure  and
temperature.

‘‘Developed  acreage’’ The number of acres that are  allocated  or assignable to productive wells or

wells capable of production.

‘‘Development  costs’’ Costs incurred to obtain access to proved reserves and to provide facilities for

extracting, treating, gathering and storing the oil and gas. More  specifically,  development costs,
including depreciation and applicable  operating costs of support equipment and facilities and other
costs of development activities, are costs incurred to: (i) gain  access to and prepare  well locations for
drilling, including surveying well locations  for the purpose of determining specific  development drilling
sites, clearing ground, draining, road building, and relocating public  roads,  gas lines, and  power  lines,  to
the extent necessary in developing the proved reserves; (ii) drill and equip development  wells,
development-type stratigraphic test wells, and service  wells, including the costs of platforms and  of well
equipment such as casing, tubing, pumping equipment,  and the wellhead assembly;  (iii) acquire,
construct, and install production facilities such as lease flow lines, separators, treaters, heaters,
manifolds, measuring devices, and production  storage tanks, natural gas cycling and processing  plants,
and central utility  and waste disposal systems;  and (iv)  provide improved  recovery systems.

‘‘Development  well’’ A well drilled within the  proved area of  a  natural gas or oil reservoir to the

depth of a stratigraphic horizon known  to be productive.

‘‘Dry hole’’ Exploratory or development well  that does not produce oil or gas in  commercial

quantities.

‘‘Economically  producible’’ The term economically producible, as it relates to a  resource,  means a

resource which generates revenue that  exceeds, or is reasonably expected to exceed, the  costs of the
operation. The value of the products that  generate  revenue shall be determined at  the terminal point of
oil and gas producing activities.

‘‘Environmental  assessment’’ A study that can be required pursuant to federal  law  to  assess the

potential direct, indirect and cumulative  impacts  of a project.

‘‘ERISA’’ Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.

‘‘Estimated ultimate recovery (EUR)’’ Estimated  ultimate recovery is the sum of reserves remaining

as of  a given date and cumulative production as of that  date.

‘‘Exploratory  well’’ A well drilled to find  a new  field or  to  find a new reservoir in a  field previously
found to be productive of oil or gas in another reservoir. Generally, an  exploratory well is any well that
is not a development well, an extension  well, a service  well, or a  stratigraphic test  well.

‘‘Field’’ An area consisting of a single  reservoir or multiple  reservoirs all grouped on or related to

the same individual geological structural feature and/or stratigraphic condition. There  may be two  or
more reservoirs in a field which are separated vertically by intervening impervious strata,  or laterally by
local geologic barriers, or by both. Reservoirs that  are associated by being in  overlapping  or adjacent

v

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

fields may be treated as a single or common operational field.  The  geological terms ‘‘structural feature’’
and ‘‘stratigraphic condition’’ are intended to identify  localized geological features as opposed to the
broader terms of basins, trends, provinces, plays,  areas-of-interest, etc.

‘‘Formation’’ A layer of rock which has distinct characteristics  that differ from nearby rock.

‘‘GAAP’’ Generally accepted accounting principles  in the United States.

‘‘HH’’ Henry Hub index.

‘‘Horizontal  drilling’’ A drilling technique used in certain formations where a well is drilled

vertically to a certain depth and then drilled at a right angle within a specified interval.

‘‘‘‘Hydraulic  fracturing’’ The process of injecting water, proppant  and  chemicals under pressure into

the formation to fracture the surrounding rock and stimulate production.

‘‘LIBOR’’ London international offered  rate.

‘‘MBbl’’ One thousand barrels of oil or  other  liquid hydrocarbons.

‘‘MBoe’’ One thousand Boe.

‘‘Mcf’’ One thousand cubic feet.

‘‘MMBoe’’ One million Boe.

‘‘MMBtu’’ One million British Thermal Units.

‘‘MMcf’’ One million cubic feet.

‘‘NYMEX’’ The New York Mercantile Exchange.

‘‘Net acres’’ The percentage of total acres an owner has out of a  particular number  of  acres,  or a

specified tract. An owner who has 50% interest in  100 acres owns 50  net acres.

‘‘Net revenue interest’’ Economic interest  remaining  after deducting all royalty  interests,  overriding

royalty interests and other burdens from the working interest ownership.

‘‘Net well’’ Deemed to exist when the sum  of fractional ownership  working interests in  gross wells
equals one. The number of net wells is the  sum of the  fractional working interest owned in  gross wells
expressed as whole numbers and fractions  of whole numbers.

‘‘Oil and gas producing activities’’ defined as (i) the search for crude oil,  including condensate and

natural gas liquids, or natural gas in their natural  states and original  locations; (ii) the acquisition of
property rights or properties for the  purpose  of  further exploration or for  the purpose of removing the
oil or gas from such properties; (iii)  the construction, drilling and production activities  necessary  to
retrieve oil and gas from their natural  reservoirs, including  the acquisition, construction,  installation,
and maintenance of field gathering and  storage  systems, such as lifting the oil and  gas to the surface’
and gathering, treating and field processing (as in the  case of processing gas to extract liquid
hydrocarbons); and (iv) extraction of  saleable hydrocarbons, in the solid, liquid,  or gaseous state, from
oil sands, shale, coal beds, or other nonrenewable natural resources which are intended to be upgraded
into synthetic oil or gas, and activities undertaken with  a view to such  extraction.

‘‘Play’’ A term applied to a portion of the  exploration  and  production cycle following the

identification by geologists and geophysicists of areas with  potential  oil  and gas  reserves.

‘‘Plugging and abandonment’’ Refers to the  sealing off of fluids in  the strata penetrated  by  a well so

that the fluids from one stratum will  not escape into another or to the surface. Regulations of many
states require plugging of abandoned wells.

vi

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

‘‘Pooling’’ Pooling is a provision in an oil  and gas lease that allows the operator to combine the

leased property with properties owned  by  others. (Pooling is  also  known  as unitization.) The separate
tracts are joined to form a drilling unit.  Ownership shares  are issued according to the acreage
contributed or by the production capabilities of each  producing well  for Fields  in later  stages of
development.

‘‘Possible reserves’’ Those additional reserves that are less  certain to be recovered  than probable

reserves (i) when deterministic methods  are used, the  total quantities ultimately recovered  from a
project have a low probability of exceeding proved plus probable plus possible reserves. When
probabilistic methods are used, there  should be at least a  10% probability that the  total quantities
ultimately recovered will equal or exceed the  proved plus probable plus possible reserves  estimates;
(ii) possible reserves may be assigned  to  areas of a  reservoir adjacent to probable reserves where data
control and interpretations of available  data  are progressively less  certain.  Frequently, this will  be  in
areas where geoscience and engineering data are unable to  define clearly the area and vertical  limits of
commercial production from the reservoir  by a defined  project; (iii)  possible  reserves also include
incremental quantities associated with a greater percentage  recovery of the  hydrocarbons in  place than
the recovery quantities assumed for probable reserves; (iv) the proved plus probable and proved plus
probable plus possible reserves estimates  must be based on  reasonable  alternative technical  and
commercial interpretations within the reservoir  or subject project that  are clearly documented,
including comparisons to results in successful similar projects;  (v) possible  reserves  may be assigned
where  geoscience and engineering data identify  directly  adjacent  portions of a  reservoir  within the same
accumulation that may be separated  from  proved  areas by faults with  displacement less than  formation
thickness or other geological discontinuities  and  that have not been  penetrated  by  a wellbore, and  the
registrant believes that such adjacent  portions are  in communication with the known (proved) reservoir.
Possible reserves may be assigned to areas that  are structurally higher  or lower  that  the proved area if
these areas are in communication with the proved reservoir; (vi) where  direct observation has defined a
highest known oil (HKO) elevation and the potential exists for an associated gas  cap,  proved oil
reserves should be assigned in the structurally  higher portions of the reservoir above the HKO  only if
the higher contact can be established  with reasonable certainty through reliable  technology. Portions of
the reservoir that do not meet this reasonable certainty criterion may be assigned as probable  and
possible oil or gas based on reservoir  fluid properties and pressure gradient interpretations.

‘‘Probable  reserves’’ Those additional reserves that are  less certain to be recovered  than proved

reserves but which, together with proved  reserves, are as likely as not to be recovered. (i) When
deterministic methods are used, it is  as  likely as  not  that  actual remaining quantities recovered will
exceed the sum of estimated proved  plus probable reserves. When probabilistic methods  are used, there
should be at least  a 50% probability  that the  actual quantities recovered will equal or  exceed the
proved plus probable reserves estimates;  (ii) probable  reserves may  be  assigned to areas  of  a reservoir
adjacent to proved reserves where data control or interpretations of available data are less certain, even
if the interpreted reservoir continuity  of  structure or productivity does not meet the reasonable
certainty criterion. Probable reserves  may be assigned to areas that  are  structurally  higher than  the
proved if these areas are in communication  with the  proved reservoir;  (iii) probable  reserves estimates
also include potential incremental quantities  associated with  a greater percentage  recovery of the
hydrocarbons in place than assumed for proved  reserves.

‘‘Production  costs’’ Costs incurred to  operated and maintain wells  and related equipment  and
facilities, including depreciation and applicable operating  costs of support  equipment and  facilities  and
other costs of operating and maintaining those wells and related  equipment  and facilities. They become
part of the cost of oil and gas produced.  Examples of  production costs (sometimes  called lifting costs)
are (a) costs of labor to operate the  wells  and related equipment and facilities;  (b) repairs and
maintenance; (c) materials, supplies, and fuel consumed and supplies utilized in operating the wells  and
related equipment and facilities; (d) property taxes  and insurance applicable to proved properties and

vii

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

wells and related equipment and facilities; (e) severance  taxes. Some support equipment  or facilities
may serve two or more oil and gas producing activities and may also serve transportation, refining, and
marketing activities. To the extent that  the  support equipment and  facilities are used  in oil and gas
producing activities, their depreciation and applicable operating  costs become  exploration, development
or production costs, as appropriate. Depreciation,  depletion, and amortization of capitalized acquisition,
exploration, and development costs are  not  production costs but also become  part of the  costs of oil
and gas produced along with production (lifting) costs identified above.

‘‘Productive  well’’ A well that is found to be capable  of  producing hydrocarbons  in sufficient
quantities such that proceeds from the  sale  of  the production exceed production expenses and taxes.

‘‘Proppant’’ Sized particles mixed with fracturing fluid to hold  fractures open  after a hydraulic
fracturing treatment. In addition to naturally  occurring sand grains, man-made or specially engineered
proppants, such as resin-coated sand or high-strength ceramic materials like sintered bauxite, may  also
be used. Proppant materials are carefully sorted  for  size and  sphericity to provide an  efficient conduit
for production of fluid from the reservoir to the  wellbore.

‘‘Proved developed reserves’’ Proved reserves that  can be expected to be recovered  through existing
wells with existing equipment and operating methods or in which  the cost of  the required  equipment is
relatively minor compared to the cost  of a new well.

‘‘Proved reserves’’ Those quantities of  oil and  gas which,  by analysis of geoscience  and engineering

data, can be estimated with reasonable  certainty to be economically producible—from  a given date
forward, from known reservoirs and  under  existing economic conditions, operating  methods and
government regulations—prior to the time at  which contracts providing the right  to  operate  expire,
unless evidence indicates that renewal  is  reasonably certain, regardless of whether  deterministic or
probabilistic methods are used for the  estimation. The project  to  extract the hydrocarbons  must  have
commenced, or the operator must be reasonably  certain that it will  commence the project, within  a
reasonable  time.

(i) The area of the reservoir considered  as proved  includes:

(a) The area identified by drilling and limited by fluid  contacts, if any, and

(b) Adjacent undrilled portions of the reservoir that  can, with reasonable certainty, be judged
to be continuous with it and to contain economically producible  oil or gas on  the basis of
available geoscience and engineering data.

(ii) In the absence of data on fluid contracts,  proved quantities in  a reservoir are  limited  by  the

lowest known hydrocarbons (LKH) as seen  in a well penetration unless geoscience,
engineering, or performance data and reliable technology  establishes  a  lower contact with
reasonable  certainty.

(iii) Where direct  observation from well penetrations  has defined a highest known oil (HKO)

elevation and the potential exists for  an associated gas  cap,  proved oil reserves  may be
assigned in the structurally higher potions of  the reservoir only if geoscience, engineering, or
performance data and reliable technology establish  the higher contact with reasonable
certainty.

(iv) Reserves that can be produced economically through application  of improved  recovery
techniques (including, but not limited to, fluid injection) are  included in the  proved
classification  when:

(a) Successful testing by a pilot project in  an area  of  the reservoir with properties no more
favorable than in the reservoir as a whole,  the operation of an installed program in the
reservoir or an analogous reservoir, or other evidence using reliable technology

viii

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

establishes the reasonable certainty of the  engineering analysis on  which the project or
program was based, and

(b) The project has been approved for  development by all necessary  parties and entities,

including  governmental  entities.

(v) Existing economic conditions include prices and costs at which  economic producibility from  a

reservoir is to be determined. The price shall  be  the average price  during the 12-month period
prior to the ending date of the period covered by the  report,  determined  as an  unweighted
arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price  for  each month within such period,
unless prices are defined by contractual arrangements, excluding escalations based upon future
conditions.

‘‘Proved undeveloped reserves’’ or ‘‘PUD’’  Proved reserves that are expected  to  be  recovered from

new wells on undrilled acreage, or from  existing  wells where a relatively major expenditure  is required
for recompletion. Reserves on undrilled  acreage  shall be limited to those directly offsetting
development spacing areas that are reasonably certain  of  production  when drilled,  unless evidence
using reliable technology exists that establishes reasonable certainty of economic producibility at  greater
distances. Undrilled locations can be  classified as having  undeveloped reserves only if a development
plan  has been adopted indicating that  they are  schedule  to be drilled  within five years, unless specific
circumstances justify a longer time. Under no  circumstances shall  estimates  for proved  undeveloped
reserves be attributable to any acreage  for  which an  application  of fluid injection or  other improved
recovery technique is contemplated, unless  such techniques have been  proved effective by actual
projects in the same reservoir or an analogous reservoir, or  by other  evidence using reliable technology
establishing  reasonable  certainty.

‘‘PV-10’’ A non-GAAP financial measure that represents  inflows from proved crude oil  and natural

gas reserves, less future development and production costs, discounted  at 10% per annum to reflect
timing of  future cash inflows and using the  twelve-month  unweighted arithmetic average  of the
first-day-of-the-month commodity prices (after adjustment for differentials in  location and  quality) for
each  of the preceding twelve months.  See footnote (2) to the Proved Reserves table  in
Item 1. ‘‘Business’’ of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information.

‘‘Reasonable  certainty’’ If deterministic methods are used, reasonable certainty means  a high degree
of confidence that the quantities will  be  recovered. If probabilistic  methods are  used, there should be at
least a 90 percent  probability that the  quantities  actually  recovered will  equal  or exceed  the estimate. A
high degree of confidence exists if the  quantity is much more likely to be achieved  than not, and, as
changes due to increased availability of geoscience (geological, geophysical  and geochemical)
engineering, and economic data are made to estimated ultimate  EUR recovery with  time, reasonably
certain estimated ultimate recovery is  much more likely to increase or remain  constant than to
decrease.

‘‘Recompletion’’ The process of re-entering an  existing wellbore that is  either producing or not
producing and completing new reservoirs in  an attempt to establish or increase existing production.

‘‘Reserves’’ Estimated remaining quantities  of  oil and gas and related substances anticipated to be

economically producible, as of a given date, by application of development projects to known
accumulations. In addition, there must  exist, or  there must be a reasonable  expectation that there will
exist, the legal right to produce or a  revenue interest in  the production, installed means  of delivering
oil and gas or related substances to market, and all  permits  and  financing  required to implement  the
project.

‘‘Reservoir’’ A porous and permeable  underground formation containing  a natural accumulation  of

producible crude oil and/or natural gas that  is confined  by impermeable rock  or water barriers and is
individual and separate from other reservoirs.

ix

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

‘‘Resource play’’ Refers to drilling programs targeted at regionally distributed oil or natural  gas
accumulations. Successful exploitation of  these reservoirs  is dependent upon  new technologies such as
horizontal drilling and multi-stage fracture stimulation to access large  rock volumes in order to produce
economic quantities of oil or natural gas.

‘‘Royalty interest’’ An interest in an oil and natural gas property entitling the owner  to  a share of

oil or gas production free of production costs, but subject to severance taxes  (unless the owner  is
agreement  agency).

‘‘Spacing’’ Regulation concerning the number of wells  which can be drilled on a given  area of land.

Depending on the depth of the reservoir, one well  may be allowed on  a small  area of five acres  or on
an area up to 640 acres. Typical spacing  is 40 acres for oil wells and 640 acres for  gas wells.  Also
referred to as ‘‘well spacing.’’

‘‘Undeveloped  acreage’’ Those leased acres on which wells have not been drilled or completed to a
point that would permit the production  of  economic quantities of oil or gas regardless of whether such
acreage contains proved reserves.

‘‘Undeveloped  reserves’’ Undeveloped oil and gas  reserves are reserves  of any category  that  are
expected to be recovered from new wells  on undrilled acreage,  or  from existing  wells where a relatively
major expenditure is required for recompletion. Also  referred  to  as ‘‘undeveloped  oil and gas reserves.’’

‘‘Working interest’’ The right granted to the lessee of a  property  to  explore  for and to produce and

own oil, gas, or other minerals. The working interest owners bear  the exploration,  development, and
operating costs on either a cash, penalty, or carried basis.

‘‘WTI’’ West Texas Intermediate index.

x

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Item 1. Business.

PART I

When we use the terms ‘‘Bonanza Creek,’’ the ‘‘Company,’’ ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’  we are  referring

to Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc. and its subsidiaries  unless the context otherwise requires.  We have
included certain technical terms important to an understanding  of  our business under Glossary of Oil
and Gas Terms above. Throughout this  document we make statements  that may be classified as
‘‘forward-looking.’’ Please refer to the  Information  Regarding Forward-Looking Statements section above
for an explanation of these types of statements.

Overview

Bonanza Creek is an independent energy company engaged in the  acquisition,  exploration,

development and production of onshore oil  and associated  liquids-rich  natural gas  in the United States.
Our oil and liquids-weighted assets are  concentrated primarily in  the Wattenberg Field in  Colorado,
which  we have designated the Rocky Mountain region, and the Dorcheat  Macedonia Field in  Southern
Arkansas, which we have designated  the Mid-Continent  region.  In addition, we own and operate
oil-producing assets in the North Park Basin  in Colorado  and the  McKamie Patton  Field in Southern
Arkansas. Our management team has  extensive  experience  acquiring  and operating oil  and gas
properties and significant expertise in horizontal drilling and fracture stimulation, which we  believe will
contribute to the development of our  sizable  inventory of projects. We  operate  approximately  99% of
our  proved reserves with an average  working interest of approximately 89% providing us with
significant control over the rate of development  of our asset base.

We  are currently focused on the horizontal development of significant resource potential from  the
Niobrara and Codell formations in the Wattenberg  Field,  expecting to invest approximately 85%  of  our
2014 capital budget in this project. The  remaining 15%  of  our 2014 budget is allocated primarily  to the
vertical development of the Dorcheat Macedonia  and  McKamie  Patton Fields in southern Arkansas,
targeting oil-rich Cotton Valley sands.  We  believe the location, size  and concentration  of  our  acreage  in
our  core project areas provide an opportunity to significantly increase production,  lower costs  and
further delineate the Company’s resource potential. In 2013, we successfully drilled 134 and completed
121 productive operated wells and participated in  drilling 12 and completing  4 productive  non-operated
wells. We had 17 operated wells in progress as of December 31, 2013. The resulting production  rates
achieved by this program increased sales  volumes by 72% over the previous year to 16,219 Boe/d  of
which  72% was crude oil and natural  gas liquids (‘‘NGL’’). The Rocky Mountain region contributed
66% and the Mid-Continent region contributed  34% to total production. Our  average net daily
production rate during December 2013  was  19,649 Boe/d, a 58% increase over  December 2012.

In the second quarter 2012, we began the divestiture  process of our  non-core  properties in

California. The California properties  were treated as assets held for sale,  and  production, revenue and
expenses associated with these properties were removed from continuing operations and reported as
discontinued operations. Those results  are  included in the following discussions  unless otherwise  noted.
During  2012, we sold the majority of these  properties for  approximately $9.3 million  in aggregate, with
one property remaining to be sold as  of  December  31, 2013.

1

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc., our independent reserve engineers, estimated  our net

proved reserves as of December 31, 2013, to be as follows:

Estimated Proved Reserves

Developed

Rocky Mountain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mid-Continent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Undeveloped

Rocky Mountain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mid-Continent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Crude
Oil
(MBbls)

Natural
Gas
(MMcf)

Natural
Gas
Liquids
(MBbls)

Total
Proved
(MBoe)

13,660
6,982
12

20,654

18,461
4,431
—

22,892

38,017
21,233
—

— 19,996
12,140
12

1,619
—

59,250

1,619

32,148

63,229
17,135
—

80,364

— 28,999
8,604
—

1,317
—

1,317

2,936

37,603

69,751

Total  Proved . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

43,546

139,614

Estimated Proved Reserves at
December 31, 2013(1)

Total
Proved % of
(MBoe) Total

% Proved
Developed ($ in MM)(2)

PV-10

Production for
the Year Ended
December  31,
2013

Average
Net  Daily
Production
(Boe/d)

% of
Total

Net Proved
Undeveloped
Drilling
Locations
as of

Projected
2014 Capital
Expenditures December  31,
($ in millions)

2013

Rocky Mountain . . . . . . 48,995
Mid-Continent . . . . . . . 20,744
12
California . . . . . . . . . . .

41% $ 908.9
70%
318.1
30%
59%
0.2
0% 100%

Total

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69,751 100%

46% $1,227.2

10,618
5,554
47

16,219

66% $500 - $540
75 -  85
34%
0
0%

100% $575 - $625

161.3
93.2
0

254.5

(1) Proved reserves and related future  net revenue  and PV-10  were calculated using prices  equal to
the twelve-month unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month commodity  prices
for each of the preceding twelve months, which  were  $96.91 per Bbl WTI  and $3.67  per
MMBtu  HH. Adjustments were then  made for location,  grade, transportation, gravity,  and Btu
content, which resulted in a decrease of $4.88 per Bbl of crude oil  and  an  increase of $1.00  per
MMBtu  of natural gas.

(2) PV-10 is a non-GAAP financial  measure and represents the  present  value of estimated  future cash
inflows from proved crude oil and natural gas reserves,  less future development  and production
costs, discounted at 10% per annum to reflect timing  of future cash inflows using  the twelve-month
unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month commodity prices, after adjustment for
differentials in location and quality,  for  each of the preceding  twelve  months. We believe that
PV-10  provides useful information to investors as it is widely used by professional analysts and
sophisticated investors when evaluating  oil and gas companies. We believe that PV-10 is relevant
and useful for evaluating the relative monetary significance of  our reserves. Professional analysts
and sophisticated investors may utilize the  measure  as a basis for comparison  of the relative  size
and value of our reserves to other companies’ reserves. Because there are many unique factors that
can impact an individual company when estimating the amount of future income taxes  to  be  paid,
we believe the use of a pre-tax measure is  valuable  in evaluating the Company and  our  reserves.
PV-10  is not intended to represent the current  market  value  of our  estimated  reserves.  PV-10

2

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

differs  from Standarized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows (‘‘Standardized Measure’’)
because it does not include the effect of  future income taxes. Please refer to the Reconciliation of
PV-10  to Standardized Measure presented  several pages below.

Our History

Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc. was incorporated  on December 2, 2010 pursuant to the laws of the

State of Delaware. On December 23,  2010,  in connection with an investment  from Project  Black
Bear LP, an entity advised by West Face  Capital Inc. (‘‘West Face Capital’’) and certain clients of
Alberta Investment Management Corporation (‘‘AIMCo’’),  we  acquired Bonanza Creek Energy
Company, LLC (‘‘BCEC’’) and Holmes  Eastern Company, LLC (‘‘HEC’’),  which transactions we refer
to as our ‘‘Corporate Restructuring.’’ We  completed the  initial public offering of our common stock in
December 2011 (our ‘‘IPO’’) pursuant to which 10,000,000 shares of  our common stock were sold.

Our Business Strategies

Our primary goal is to increase stockholder  value  by  investing capital in projects that provide
attractive rates of return relative to our  cost  of capital, and increase our production, proved  reserves
and cash flow. We intend to accomplish this by focusing on the following key strategies:

• Increase Production from Wattenberg Horizontal Opportunities and Develop Additional Resource

Potential in Both of our Core Areas. We intend to continue to develop the  Niobrara and Codell
formations utilizing horizontal drilling.  While  we are  focused on the Niobrara B bench, primarily
using 4,000 foot laterals, we have begun, and plan  to  continue, to develop the Niobrara C bench
and Codell formation as well as to test extended reach  lateral drilling in the Wattenberg Field
and down-spacing concepts in both of our core areas.  We  expect to continue to generate
profitable, long-term reserve and production growth predominantly through repeatable,
lower-risk development drilling on our assets, which have  multiple resource horizons.

• Pursue Ongoing Corporate Growth. We intend to pursue bolt-on acquisitions in  the Wattenberg
Field and in southern Arkansas where  we can take advantage of our core operational and
engineering competencies. In addition, we will evaluate acquisitions of other opportunities where
we believe the application of our core competencies will  enhance shareholder  value.

• Maintain High Degree of Operatorship. We currently have and intend to maintain a high working
interest in our assets, thereby allowing us  to  leverage our technical, operating, and  management
skills and control the timing of our capital  expenditures.

• Manage Risk Exposure. In order to achieve more predictable cash flow  and  to  reduce our

exposure to adverse fluctuations in oil prices, we have entered  into  and  intend in  the future to
enter into derivative contracts for a significant portion of our expected oil  production.

Our Competitive Strengths

We believe the following combination of  strengths will enable us to implement our  strategies:

• High Quality Asset Base with Oil and Liquids-Weighted  Growth. As of December 31, 2013, we
have accumulated approximately 35,500 net acres in  the Wattenberg  Field  prospective for the
Niobrara formation, of which, approximately 18,000  net acres have been  successfully  tested to
have prospective for the Codell formation. We will continue to test our  remaining Wattenberg
Field acreage to prove out the Codell  formation.  Our acreage is in  an area noted for its high net
oil and  liquids content, with oil and NGLs comprising  approximately 65% of proved reserves
and approximately 73% of current production, yielding strong  economic returns at current
commodity prices. We believe our acreage  position represents a large inventory of  high value,
ready-to-drill potential locations with significant upside potential and that the  consistently

3

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

positive results in this play by us and other operators validate our investment and the continued
development of the area. We believe adequate gathering systems and  takeaway  capacity are  in
place in this area, enabling a short time period from well completion  to  first  product sales.

• Contiguous Nature of Our Leasehold. Our acreage positions in the Wattenberg  Field and  in the
Mid-Continent region are highly contiguous which allows for more efficient field operations. In
the Wattenberg Field, we believe our leasehold is particularly advantaged for development  with
horizontal wells and extended reach laterals.

• High Degree of Operational Control. We operate approximately 99% of our proved  reserves with
an average working interest of approximately  89% providing us with significant control over the
rate of development of our asset base.  This  allows us  to  employ the drilling and completion
techniques we believe to be most effective, manage costs and  control the timing  and allocation
of our capital expenditures.

• Gas Processing Capability in Southern Arkansas. We own three gas processing facilities  and
150 miles of gathering pipeline that principally serve our production from the Dorcheat
Macedonia Field and our McKamie  Patton Field properties. We believe the ownership of this
gathering and processing infrastructure allows us  to  better control the  timing of the development
of our reserves and improves our  economics in southern Arkansas.

• Experienced Management Team with Proven Track Record. Our senior management team has

extensive experience in the oil and gas  industry.  Our senior technical team averages  more than
30 years of industry experience, including  experience  in multiple North American resource plays
and basins. We believe our management and technical team is one of our principal competitive
strengths due to its proven track record in identification, acquisition and execution of resource
conversion opportunities. In addition,  this team  possesses substantial expertise in horizontal
drilling techniques and fracture stimulation.

• Financial Flexibility. Our capital structure is intended to provide  a high degree of financial

flexibility to grow our asset base, both through organic projects and opportunistic  acquisitions.
Our liquidity as of December 31, 2013  was  approximately  $595 million, which was comprised of
$414 million of availability under our credit  facility, if we elect to take advantage of our entire
borrowing base, and approximately $181 million  of  cash  on hand. We also  employ a disciplined
approach to management of leverage and govern our organic  capital  spending programs.

Our Operations

Our operations are mainly focused in  the Wattenberg Field in the Rocky Mountain  region and in

the Dorcheat Macedonia Field in the Mid-Continent region.

Rocky Mountain Region

The two main areas in which we operate in  the Rocky Mountain  region are the Wattenberg Field

in Weld  County, Colorado and the North Park Basin in Jackson County, Colorado.

Wattenberg Field—Weld County, Colorado. Our operations are in the oil and liquids-weighted

extension area of the Wattenberg Field targeting the Niobrara  and  Codell formations. As  of
December 31, 2013, our Wattenberg position consisted of approximately 40,000 gross  (35,500  net) acres.
During  2013, we had a net increase of approximately 4,500 net acres in the  Wattenberg  Field, which
includes an increase in net acreage of approximately 5,250 acres through acquisitions and leasing in our
core area and a reduction of approximately 750 net  acres due  to  expiration of non-core  lands,
adjustments in ownership due to further title  information  and other adjustments including strategic
partnerships and pooling arrangements.  We  own 3-D seismic surveys covering substantially  all  of  our

4

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

acreage in the Wattenberg Field, which  helps provide  efficient and targeted horizontal drilling
operations.

The Wattenberg Field is now primarily  developed  for the  Niobrara and Codell formations using
horizontal drilling and multi-stage fracture stimulation techniques.  We believe our acreage position has
been fully delineated for the Niobrara B bench  and expect this  horizon to be a primary source of
future production growth. In addition,  our testing in  the Niobrara C bench and Codell formation  has
been successful to date and supports future delineation and development  drilling.

Our estimated proved reserves at December 31, 2013  in the Wattenberg Field were 48,725 MBoe.

As of December 31, 2013, we had a total of 313 gross producing wells,  of  which 124  gross were
horizontal wells, and our average daily  production  during  2013 was approximately 10,495  Boe/d, of
which  91% came from horizontal wells. Our average daily  production  for the  month of December 2013
was 13,619 Boe/d. Our working interest for  all producing wells  averages approximately 91% and our net
revenue interest is approximately 82%

We  continue to expand our proved reserves in this area by drilling  non-proved horizontal locations.
During  2013, we drilled 87 horizontal wells and successfully  completed 73.  In the  Niobrara  B bench, we
drilled 69 and successfully completed 62  standard length (4,000 foot lateral) horizontal wells and  two
extended reach horizontal wells with average  lateral length of 9,240 feet during 2013. Since  we began
our  horizontal Niobrara B bench drilling program  in 2011,  through December  31, 2013, we have drilled
and successfully completed 98 wells of  which 92  are on 80-acre spacing  and  6 are on 40-acre spacing.
We  believe the results demonstrated by our  wells spaced at  40 acres warrant continued development of
the Niobrara B bench at that spacing  density.  In  addition, we believe  the results demonstrated by our
extended reach laterals warrant continued testing  of lateral lengths of greater  than 4,000  feet. In the
Niobrara C bench and Codell formation, we drilled 10  and  6 standard length (4,000 foot lateral)
horizontal wells, respectively, and successfully completed 5  and 4  standard length (4,000 foot lateral)
horizontal wells during 2013. The drilling results demonstrated in the Niobrara C bench and Codell
formation were in-line with expectations and provide the basis for our  accelerated development plan
during 2014.

We  estimate our capital expenditures in the Wattenberg Field  for 2014 will be $493 million to $533

million, which includes drilling a projected  87 horizontal wells in  the Niobrara  B bench, 16  horizontal
wells in the Niobrara C bench, one horizontal  well in  the Niobrara A bench and  17 horizontal wells  in
the Codell sandstone. This drilling program includes approximately 23 proved locations and  98
non-proved locations and approximately  $28 million for non-operated  horizontal drilling.

North Park Basin—Jackson County, Colorado. We control approximately 22,000 gross (17,000 net)
acres in the North Park Basin in Jackson County,  Colorado, all prospective  for the  Niobrara  oil shale.
We  operate the North and South McCallum Fields, which currently produce  light oil and  CO2 from the
Dakota/Lakota Group sandstones and oil from a  shallow  waterflood in the Pierre  B sandstone. Oil
production is trucked to market, while CO2 production is gathered to a nearby plant for processing.

In the North Park Basin, our estimated proved reserves as of  December 31, 2013 were

approximately 270 MBoe, 100% of which were crude oil. Our average  net production during 2013 was
approximately 123 Boe/d. None of our  CO2 production is currently reflected in our reserve  reports.

Currently, there is no takeaway capacity for natural gas from the North Park Basin. Any future

commercial development of the Niobrara  shale in this  area will require significant investment to
construct the infrastructure necessary  to gather and transport the produced  associated natural  gas. We
have budgeted approximately $7 million  during 2014 to drill two exploration wells in  the North  Park
Basin.

5

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Mid-Continent  Region

In southern Arkansas, we target the oil-rich Cotton Valley sands in the  Dorcheat Macedonia and
McKamie Patton Fields. As of December 31,  2013, our estimated proved reserves in this region were
20,744 MBoe, 69% of which were oil  and natural gas liquids and 59% of which were  proved developed.
We  currently operate 237 producing vertical wells and, as of December 31, 2013,  have an identified
drilling  inventory of approximately 112  gross (93 net) PUD drilling  locations on our  acreage. During
2013, we drilled 47 wells and successfully completed 48 wells  in the Dorcheat Macedonia and  McKamie
Patton  Fields. We  achieved an average production rate for 2013 of 5,554 Boe/d, of  which 70% was  from
crude oil and liquids, and an average  production  rate for December 2013  of  5,889 Boe/d. Productive
reservoirs range in depth from 4,500 to 9,000 feet  in depth. Those reservoirs include the Smackover
and the Pettet, but our primary development target  is the Cotton Valley.

Dorcheat  Macedonia.

In the Dorcheat Macedonia Field, we average an  approximate  84% working

interest and an approximate 70% net revenue interest on all producing wells, and  the majority of our
acreage is held by unitization, production, or drilling operations. We have approximately 190 gross
producing wells and our average net  daily production during  2013 was approximately 5,116  Boe/d.
During the month of December 2013, it was approximately  5,541 Boe/d. Our proved reserves in this
field  are  approximately 19,377 MBoe.  Prior to 2013,  the development  plan for the Dorcheat Macedonia
Field was based on a maximum well density equal  to  10-acre spacing.  Late  in 2012, we initiated the
first of three pilot tests which increased  well density  to  5-acre spacing.  Results from  these  pilots are
encouraging and we plan to allocate 19% of our 2014 capital budget  in the Mid-Continent  region to
this down-spacing project.

As of December 31, 2013, we have identified  approximately 110  gross (91 net)  PUD drilling
locations on our acreage in this area.  During  2013, we drilled 44 and successfully completed 45 vertical
Cotton Valley wells in Dorcheat Macedonia. We have  budgeted  capital  expenditures  for 2014 of
approximately $75 million to $85 million for the development of this  field. In 2014, we expect to drill
34 PUD locations on 10-acre spacing with a complete cost per well of approximately $1.8  million,
approximately $1.7 million of which will be for initial drilling and completion with the  remaining
$100,000 attributed to the first recompletion generally  executed within six  months of first production. In
addition, we expect to drill 10 wells on  5-acre spacing and perform 112  recompletions on  existing wells.

Other Mid-Continent. We own additional interests in our Mid-Continent  region  near  the Dorcheat
Macedonia Field. These include interests  in the McKamie Patton,  Atlanta and  Beech Creek Fields. As
of December 31, 2013, our estimated aggregate proved reserves in these fields were  approximately
1,367 MBoe, and average net daily production during 2013 was approximately 438 Boe/d.  During  2013,
we drilled 3 vertical Cotton Valley wells  in the  McKamie-Patton Field.  In 2014, we expect to continue
development at McKamie-Patton with  4 vertical Cotton Valley wells.

Gas Processing Facilities. Our Mid-Continent gas processing facilities are located in Lafayette and

Columbia counties in Arkansas and are strategically located to serve our  production in  the region.  In
the aggregate, our Arkansas gas processing facilities have  approximately  40 MMcf/d of  capacity with
86,000 gallons per day of associated natural  gas liquids capacity. Our ownership of these facilities and
related gathering pipeline provides us  with the  benefit  of  controlling processing and compression  of our
natural gas production and timing of connection to our newly completed wells.

Reserves

Estimated Proved Reserves

Unless otherwise specifically identified,  the summary data  with respect to our estimated proved
reserves presented below has been prepared by  our independent reserve engineering firm in  accordance
with rules and regulations of the Securities and  Exchange Commission (the ‘‘SEC’’) applicable to

6

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

companies involved in oil and natural gas  producing  activities. Our proved reserve estimates do not
include probable or possible reserves which  may  exist, categories which the new  SEC rules now  permit
us to disclose in public reports. Our  estimated proved reserves for the years ended  December 31, 2013,
2012, and 2011 and for future periods are determined using the preceding twelve-months’  unweighted
arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month prices.  For  a  definition of proved  reserves under the
SEC rules, please see the Glossary of  Oil and  Natural Gas Terms included in the beginning of this
report.

Reserve estimates are inherently imprecise and  estimates for new discoveries and  undeveloped
locations are more imprecise than reserve estimates  for producing  oil and gas properties. Accordingly,
these estimates are expected to change  as new information  becomes available. The PV-10 values shown
in the following table are not intended to represent the current  market  value  of  our  estimated  proved
reserves. Neither prices nor costs have been escalated. The actual quantities  and present values of our
estimated proved reserves may be less than  we have estimated. No  estimates of our proved reserves
have been filed with or included in reports to any federal authority or agency, other than the SEC,
since the beginning of the last fiscal year.

The table below summarizes our estimated  proved reserves at December 31,  2013, 2012, and 2011

for each  of the areas in which we operate.  The  proved reserve estimates at December 31, 2013
presented in the table below are based on reports prepared by Netherland, Sewell &  Associates, Inc.,
our  independent reserve engineers, whereas the December 31, 2012 and 2011  estimated  proved
reserved were prepared by Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc. In preparing these reports, Netherland,
Sewell & Associates, Inc. and Cawley,  Gillespie & Associates, Inc. evaluated 100%  of  our  properties at
December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011.  For more information regarding our  independent  reserve
engineers, please see Independent Reserve  Engineers below. The information in  the following  table does
not give any effect to or reflect our commodity derivatives.

Region/Field

Rocky Mountain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Wattenberg . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
North Park . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mid-Continent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dorcheat  Macedonia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
McKamie  Patton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

At December 31,

2013

2012

2011

(MMBoe)
32.4
31.9
0.5
20.6
19.0
1.6
0.0
0.0

53.0

21.4
20.8
0.6
21.6
19.9
1.6
0.1
0.7

43.7

49.1
48.8
0.3
20.7
19.4
1.3
0.0
0.0

69.8

7

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

The following table sets forth more information regarding  our estimated proved reserves  at

December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011:

At December 31,

2013

2012

2011

Reserve Data(1):

Estimated proved reserves:

Oil (MMBbls) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Natural gas (Bcf) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Natural gas liquids (MMBbls) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total estimated proved reserves (MMBoe)(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Percent oil and liquids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

43.6
139.6
2.9
69.8

30.2
118.5
3.1
53.0

24.6
93.0
3.6
43.7

67% 63% 65%

Estimated proved developed reserves:

Oil (MMBbls) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Natural gas (Bcf) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Natural gas liquids (MMBbls) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total estimated proved developed reserves (MMBoe)(2)
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Percent oil and liquids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

20.7
59.2
1.6
32.2

14.3
48.9
1.3
23.8

10.6
31.3
1.2
17.0

69% 66% 69%

Estimated proved undeveloped reserves:

Oil (MMBbls) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Natural gas (Bcf) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Natural gas liquids (MMBbls) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total estimated proved undeveloped reserves (MMBoe)(2) . . . . . . . . . . . .
Percent oil and liquids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

22.9
80.4
1.3
37.6

15.8
69.6
1.8
29.2

14.0
61.7
2.4
26.7

64% 60% 61%

(1) Proved reserves were calculated using prices equal to the twelve-month unweighted arithmetic

average of the first-day-of-the-month prices  for each  of the preceding  twelve months, which  were
$96.91 per Bbl WTI and $3.67 per MMBtu HH, $94.71 per Bbl  WTI and $2.76 per MMBtu  HH,
$96.19 per Bbl WTI and $4.12 per MMBtu HH for the years ended December 31,  2013, 2012  and
2011 respectively. Adjustments were made for  location and grade.

(2) Determined using the ratio of 6 Mcf of natural gas being equivalent to one Bbl of  crude  oil.

Proved developed oil and gas reserves are reserves that  can be expected to be recovered  through

existing wells with existing equipment and  operating methods. Proved undeveloped oil and gas  reserves
are reserves that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or  from existing
wells where a relatively major expenditure  is required  for  completion. Proved  undeveloped reserves on
undrilled acreage are limited to those  directly offsetting development spacing areas  that  are reasonably
certain of production when drilled. All  proved undeveloped locations  in our  December 31, 2013
reserves report are scheduled to be drilled  within five years from their initial proved booking date.  The
technologies used to establish our proved reserves are a combination of geologic  mapping, electric  logs,
seismic data and production data.

Estimated proved reserves at December 31, 2013 were  69.8  MMBoe, a 32%  increase from

estimated proved reserves of 53.0 MMBoe  at December 31, 2012. The net increase  in reserves of 16.8
MMBoe resulting from development  in  the Wattenberg Field is  comprised of 28.9 MMBoe of additions
in extensions and discoveries offset by 3.8 MMBoe in  production  and  negative  revisions of 8.3  MMBoe.
The negative revision results primarily  from a combination of eliminating  45 net vertical  locations from
proved undeveloped due to the change in focus from  vertical to horizontal development, the
elimination of all proved non-producing  reserves associated with vertical well refracs, recompletions,
and lower performance from our vertical  producers due to increased line  pressure.  The  addition  in
extension and discoveries is the result of drilling and completing 68 unproved horizontal locations

8

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

(including 4 non-operated) in the Wattenberg  Field during 2013  and  the  addition  of  89 new  horizontal
proved undeveloped locations. A net  increase in  reserves  of  0.1 MMBoe in  the Mid-Continent region
resulted from the drilling and completion  of  our  5-acre increased density pilots in the  Cotton  Valley
formation offset by a negative revision resulting from lower than expected proved developed
performance. A small positive pricing revision of  0.51 MMBoe resulted from an increase in average
commodity price from $94.71 per Bbl WTI and $2.76 per MMBtu  HH  for the year ended
December 31, 2012 to $96.91 per Bbl  WTI and $3.67 per MMBtu HH for the  year  ended
December 31, 2013.

Estimated proved reserves at December 31, 2012 were  53.0  MMBoe, a 21%  increase from
estimated proved reserves of 43.7 MMBoe  at December 31, 2011. The net increase  in reserves of 9.3
MMBoe resulted from development in  the Wattenberg Field was comprised of 18.9  MMBoe  of
additions in extensions and discoveries  offset  by  3.5 MMBoe in  production and negative revisions of 6.1
MMBoe. The negative revision results  from  a combination of eliminating 50 locations  from proved
undeveloped due to the change in focus from vertical to horizontal development and lower
performance from our vertical producers. The addition  in extension and discoveries is the  result of
drilling  and completing 65 unproved  locations in  the Wattenberg  Field during  2012 (approximately  50%
horizontal Niobrara B bench locations,  50%  vertical development) and the addition of 63  new proved
undeveloped locations (100% horizontal Niobrara B  bench locations). A  net increase in  reserves  of  0.68
MMBoe in the Mid-Continent region resulted from  continued development of the Cotton Valley
formation. Proved reserves decreased by 0.67 MMBoe  with the divestiture of the majority  of our
California properties. A small negative pricing revision  of 0.1 MMBoe  resulted from a decrease in
commodity price from $96.19 per Bbl WTI and an average price of $4.12 per MMBtu  HH for the year
ended December 31, 2011 to $94.71 per Bbl WTI and $2.76 per MMBtu HH for  the year ended
December 31, 2012.

Estimated proved reserves at December 31, 2011 were  43.7  MMBoe, a 33%  increase from
estimated proved reserves of 32.9 MMBoe  at December 31, 2010. All proved undeveloped locations
included in our December 31, 2011 reserves report are scheduled to be drilled within five  years  from
their initial proved booking date. The increase was  primarily due  to  extensions and  discoveries
associated with the Rocky Mountain region and was comprised  of 168 new proved undeveloped
locations and 54 unproved locations that were  drilled during 2011 and moved directly to proved
reserves. Another component of the  increase was our commodity price  assumption  for oil which
increased $16.76 per Bbl WTI to $96.19 per Bbl WTI  for the  year ended December  31, 2011 from
$79.43 per Bbl WTI for the year ended December  31, 2010.

Reconciliation of PV-10 to Standardized Measure

PV-10  is derived from the Standardized Measure  of discounted  future net cash flows, which  is the

most directly comparable GAAP financial  measure. PV-10 is a computation of the  Standardized
Measure on a pre-tax basis. PV-10 is  equal to the Standardized  Measure at the applicable date,  before
deducting future income taxes, discounted at 10%. We believe that  the presentation  of PV-10 is
relevant and useful to investors because  it presents the discounted future net cash  flows attributable to
our  estimated net proved reserves prior  to  taking into account future corporate income taxes, and it  is
a useful measure for evaluating the relative  monetary  significance of our oil  and natural gas properties.
Further, investors may utilize the measure  as a basis for  comparison  of the relative  size and value of
our  reserves to other companies. We  use this measure  when assessing  the potential return on
investment related to our oil and natural gas properties. PV-10,  however, is not a substitute  for the
Standardized Measure. Our PV-10 measure  and the  Standardized  Measure  do  not  purport  to  present
the fair value of our oil and natural gas  reserves.

9

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

The following table provides a reconciliation  of PV-10 to the Standardized  Measure at

December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011:

PV-10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Present value of future income taxes discounted  at

December  31,

2013

2012

2011

$1,227.2

(in millions)
$ 834.7

$ 794.0

10% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(301.9)

(151.3)

(127.8)

Standardized  Measure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 925.3

$ 683.4

$ 666.2

Proved Undeveloped Reserves

Net Reserves, MBoe

At December 31,

2013

2012

2011

Beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Converted to proved developed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additions from capital program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisitions (sales) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Revisions (pricing and engineering) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

29,192
(3,047)
16,535
1,779
(6,856)

26,652
(5,166)
13,913
(430)
(5,777)

21,334
(4,184)
10,190
—
(688)

End of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

37,603

29,192

26,652

At December 31, 2013, our proved undeveloped reserves were  37,603 MBoe, all of which are
scheduled to be drilled within five years  of their initial  disclosure. At December 31,  2012, our proved
undeveloped reserves were 29,192 MBoe. During 2013,  3,047 MBoe or 10% of our proved undeveloped
reserves (40 wells) were converted into  proved developed reserves requiring  $62.8 million of drilling
and completion capital. Continued delineation and testing  in our  Wattenberg Field in  2013 resulted  in a
conversion rate less than 20% for the year.  In  2014, our drilling plans include proved  undeveloped
drilling  estimated to convert over 20% of our proved undeveloped reserves into proved developed
reserves. Executing our 2013 capital  program resulted  in the addition of 16,535 MBoe in proved
undeveloped reserves (92 wells). The negative  revision of 6,856 MBoe results from  a combination of
eliminating vertical proved undeveloped  locations in  the Wattenberg  Field  continuing  the transition to
horizontal development and a reduction  in proved  undeveloped reserves in  the Dorcheat Macedonia
Field based on proved developed performance.

At December 31, 2012, our proved undeveloped reserves were  29,192 MBoe, all of which were

scheduled to be drilled within five years  of their initial  disclosure. At December 31,  2011, our proved
undeveloped reserves were 26,652 MBoe. During 2012,  5,166 MBoe or 19.4% of our proved
undeveloped reserves (89 wells) were  converted into proved developed reserves requiring $128.9 million
of drilling and completion capital and  $16.2 million of capital primarily used to expand our Dorcheat
Macedonia gas plant. Executing our  2012  capital program  resulted in  the addition  of 13,913 MBoe in
proved undeveloped reserves (83 wells).  Sales  of the majority of our California  properties during 2012
reduced our proved undeveloped reserves by 430 MBoe.  The  negative revision of  5,777 MBoe results
from a combination of eliminating 50 locations in  the Wattenberg  Field from proved undeveloped due
to the change in focus from vertical to horizontal development  and the reduction in remaining  vertical
proved undeveloped reserves as a result of lower performance from our vertical  producers.

At December 31, 2011, our proved undeveloped reserves were  26,652 MBoe, all of which were

scheduled to be drilled within five years  of their initial  disclosure. At December 31,  2010, our proved
undeveloped reserves were 21,334 MBoe. During 2011,  4,184 MBoe or 19.6% of our proved

10

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

undeveloped reserves were converted into proved developed reserves requiring  $93.9 million of capital.
The majority of the reserves converted to proved developed during 2011, 3,176 MBoe or 76%, resulted
from our capital program in the Mid-Continent region. Executing  the 2011 capital  program in  both the
Rocky Mountain and Mid-Continent  regions  resulted in the  addition of 10,190 MBoe in proved
undeveloped  reserves.

Internal controls over reserves estimation  process

We  maintain an internal staff of petroleum engineers and  geoscience  professionals who ensure the

integrity, accuracy and timeliness of data furnished to our independent  reserve engineers for their
reserves estimation process. The technical person primarily responsible for overseeing the reserves
process within the Company is Lynn  E. Boone.  Ms. Boone is  our Senior Vice President, Planning &
Reserves. Ms. Boone attended the Colorado School of Mines and graduated in 1982 with a  Bachelor of
Science degree in Chemical and Petroleum Refining Engineering. She  attended the University of
Oklahoma and graduated in 1985 with a  Master  of Science  degree  in Petroleum Engineering.
Ms. Boone has been involved in evaluations and the estimation of reserves and resources for over
25 years. She has managed the technical  reserve process at a company  level for over ten years.

Our technical team works with our banking syndicate members at least  twice each year, for a
valuation of our reserves by the banks  in our lending  group and  their  engineers  in determining the
borrowing base under our revolving credit facility.

Independent Reserve Engineers

The reserves estimates for the year ended December 31, 2013  shown herein have been

independently evaluated by Netherland,  Sewell & Associates, Inc. (‘‘NSAI’’), a worldwide leader of
petroleum property analysis for industry and financial  organizations and  government agencies. NSAI
was founded in 1961 and performs consulting  petroleum  engineering services  under Texas Board  of
Professional Engineers Registration No.  F-2699.  Within NSAI, the technical persons  primarily
responsible for preparing the estimates set  forth in the  NSAI reserves report incorporated  herein  are
Mr. Dan Paul Smith and Mr. John Hattner.  Mr. Smith  has been practicing consulting petroleum
engineering at NSAI since 1980. Mr. Smith is a Licensed Professional Engineer  in the State of Texas
(License No. 49093) and has over 30 years of practical experience in petroleum engineering and in the
estimation and evaluation of reserves. He  graduated from Mississippi  State  University  in 1973 with a
Bachelor of Science Degree in Petroleum Engineering. Mr. Hattner has been practicing consulting
petroleum geology at NSAI since 1991. Mr.  Hattner is  a Licensed Professional Geoscientist in  the State
of Texas, Geology, (License No. 559)  and has over 30  years  of practical experience in petroleum
geosciences, with over 20 years experience in the  estimation and  evaluation of reserves. He graduated
from University of Miami, Florida, in 1976 with a Bachelor of Science Degree  in Geology; from Florida
State University in 1980 with a Master  of Science Degree in Geological Oceanography; and from Saint
Mary’s College of California in 1989  with  a Master of Business  Administration  Degree. Both technical
principals meet or exceed the education, training, and experience  requirements set forth in the
Standards Pertaining to the Estimating  and Auditing  of  Oil and  Gas Reserves Information promulgated
by the Society of Petroleum Engineers;  both  are proficient in judiciously applying industry standard
practices to engineering and geoscience  evaluations  as well  as applying SEC and  other  industry reserves
definitions and guidelines.

The proved reserves estimate for the Company for the years ended  December 31, 2011 and 2012

shown herein have been independently prepared by Cawley, Gillespie & Associates,  Inc.; which was
founded in 1961 and performs consulting petroleum  engineering services under Texas Board of
Professional Engineers Registration No.  F-693.  Within Cawley,  Gillespie  & Associates, Inc., the
technical person primarily responsible  for preparing  the estimates shown herein was Zane  Meekins.
Mr. Meekins has been a petroleum engineering consultant at  Cawley, Gillespie & Associates,  Inc. since

11

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

1989. Mr. Meekins is a Registered Professional Engineer in the  State  of  Texas (License  No. 71055) and
has over 24 years of practical experience in  petroleum  engineering, with over 22  years’  experience  in
the estimation and evaluation of reserves. He graduated from Texas  A&M University with a  BS in
Petroleum Engineering. Mr. Meekins  meets or exceeds  the education,  training, and experience
requirements set forth in the Standards Pertaining to the Estimating and  Auditing of Oil and Gas
Reserves Information promulgated by the Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Production, Revenues and Price History

Oil and natural gas are commodities. The price that we receive  for the  oil and natural  gas we
produce is largely a function of market  supply and demand. Demand for  oil and natural gas in the
United States has increased dramatically over the last  ten years. Beginning  in 2010 there  was a steady
decline  in natural gas prices but prices  stabilized in the  twelve  month period ended December 31, 2013.
The decline was caused by a global economic  downturn and increased inventory of natural gas. Oil
prices have steadily increased since 2010 and continued to do so during the twelve month period ended
December 31, 2013. The increase was caused by increased demand coupled with  unexpected global
production  outages.

Demand  is impacted by general economic conditions, weather  and other seasonal conditions,
including hurricanes and tropical storms. Over or under supply of oil or natural gas can result in
substantial price volatility. Historically, commodity  prices have  been volatile and  we expect that
volatility to continue in the future. A substantial or extended  decline in oil  or natural  gas prices or
poor drilling results could have a material adverse effect  on our financial position, results of operations,
cash flows, quantities of oil and natural gas reserves that may be economically produced and our ability
to access capital markets.

The following table sets forth information  regarding oil  and natural  gas production,  realized prices,
and production costs for the periods indicated. For additional information on price calculations, please

12

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

see information set forth in Item 7. Management’s  Discussion and Analysis  of  Financial Condition and
Results of Operations.

Oil:
Total Production (MBbls) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Wattenberg Field . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dorcheat  Macedonia  Field . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average  sales  price  (per  Bbl),  including  derivatives(2) . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average  sales  price  (per  Bbl),  excluding  derivatives(2) . . . . . . . . . . . .
Natural Gas:
Total Production (MMcf) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Wattenberg Field . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dorcheat  Macedonia  Field . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average  sales  price  (per  Mcf),  including  derivatives(2) . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average  sales  price  (per  Mcf),  excluding  derivatives(2) . . . . . . . . . . . .
Natural Gas Liquids:
Total Production (MBbls) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Wattenberg Field . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dorcheat  Macedonia  Field . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average  sales  price  (per  Bbl),  including  derivatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average  sales  price  (per  Bbl),  excluding  derivatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Oil Equivalents:
Total Production (MBoe) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Wattenberg Field . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dorcheat  Macedonia  Field . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average daily production (Boe/d) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Wattenberg Field . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dorcheat  Macedonia  Field . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average Production Costs (per Boe) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

For the Years Ended December  31,

2013(1)

2012(1)

2011

3,887.2
2,775.6
925.2
88.82
91.84

9,975.9
6,269.1
3,598.3
4.70
4.66

352.8
10.2
342.6
51.74
51.74

$
$

$
$

$
$

5,902.7
3,830.7
1,867.5
16,171.8
10,495.0
5116.4
8.09

$

2,191.0
1,190.8
789.5
$ 88.40
$ 89.08

5,473.2
2,485.6
2,973.8
3.76
3.62

$
$

284.7
—
284.7
$ 55.54
$ 55.54

3,387.9
1,605.0
1,569.8
9,257
4,385.4
4,289.1
9.06

$

887.4
400.8
359.8
$ 85.51
$ 89.67

2,773.1
1,072.2
1,642.2
5.09
4.85

$
$

183.8
—
183.8
$ 67.23
$ 67.23

1,533.4
579.5
817.3
4,201.1
1,587.7
2,239.2
$ 13.37

(1) Amounts reflect results for continuing  operations and  exclude results for  discontinued operations
related to non-core properties in California sold or  held for sale as  of December 31, 2013  and
2012.

(2) Excludes ad valorem and severance  taxes.

Principal Customers

Three of our customers, Plains Marketing LP, Lion Oil  Trading  & Transportation, Inc.,  and High
Sierra Crude Oil & Marketing comprised 37%, 23%, and 15%,  respectively, of  our total  revenue for
the year ended December 31, 2013. No other single non-affiliated customer  accounted for  10% or more
of crude oil and natural gas sales in 2013. We believe the  loss of  any one customer would not have  a
material effect on our financial position  or results of operations because there are numerous potential
customers of our production.

Delivery Commitments

We  do not have any material delivery  commitments.

13

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Productive Wells

The following table sets forth the number  of producing oil  and  natural gas  wells in  which we

owned a working interest at December  31, 2013.

Oil

Natural
Gas(1)

Total

Operated

Gross Net Gross Net Gross Net Gross Net

Rocky Mountain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 425 396.9 — — 425 396.9 407 391.4
Mid-Continent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237 197.3 — — 237 197.3 236 197.3
22.0
California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

22.0 — — 22

22.0

22

22

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 684 616.2 — — 684 616.2 665 610.7

(1) All gas production is associated  gas from  producing  oil wells.

Acreage

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the  developed  and undeveloped
acreage in which we own a working interest as of December 31, 2013 for each of the  areas where  we
operate along with the PV-10 values  of  each. Acreage related to royalty, overriding  royalty and other
similar interests is excluded from this summary.

Developed Acres

Undeveloped
Acres

Total Acres

Gross

Net

Gross

Net

Gross

Net

PV-10

Rocky Mountain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37,998 36,208 23,168 16,057 61,166 52,265 $ 908,857
902,625
6,232
318,139
280,571
37,568
229

Wattenberg Field . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30,184 28,394
Other Rocky Mountain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mid-Continent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dorcheat  Macedonia  Field . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other Mid-Continent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7,062 39,558 35,456
8,995 21,608 16,809
9,258
5,128 12,243
4,198
6,246
1,304
5,060
5,997
3,824
480
— 480

9,374
7,814 13,794
6,846
4,130
2,129
2,894
4,717
1,236
—
480

7,814
5,397
4,117
1,280
480

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43,875 40,818 30,014 21,185 73,889 62,003 $1,227,225

Undeveloped  acreage

The following table sets forth the number  of net undeveloped  acres as of December 31, 2013  that

will expire over the next three years by area unless  production is  established within  the spacing units
covering the acreage prior to the expiration dates:

Rocky Mountain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
320
Mid-Continent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —
California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —

574

2,631
— 137
—
—

2,674
122
—

2,561
1,099
—

1,233
696
—

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

320

574

2,768

2,796

3,660

1,929

Expiring 2014

Expiring 2015

Expiring 2016

Gross

Net

Gross

Net

Gross

Net

14

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Drilling Activity

The following table describes the exploratory and development wells we drilled and  completed

during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011.

For the Years Ended December 31,

2013(1)

2012

2011

Gross

Net

Gross

Net

Gross

Net

Exploratory
Productive Wells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —
1
Dry Wells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total Exploratory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1

Development
117
Productive Wells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dry Wells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —

— —
1

1

1

1

— 53
1 —

1

53

102.7

149
— —

140.9

53
— —

Total Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

117

118

102.7

103.7

149

150

140.9

141.9

53

106

52.9
—

52.9

48.9
—

48.9

101.8

The following table describes the present drilling  activities as of  December 31, 2013.

As of
December  31,
2013

Gross

Net

Exploratory
Rocky Mountain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —
Mid-Continent
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —
California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —

Total Exploratory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —

Development
15
Rocky Mountain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mid-Continent
2
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —

Total Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

17

17

—
—
—

—

15
2
—

17

17

15

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Capital Expenditure Budget

Our anticipated 2014 capital budget is  in a range of $575 million to $625  million which, at  the

midpoint of the range, represents an increase of 27% over capital spending during 2013  of
$472 million. We plan to spend approximately  $500 million  to  $540 million or 87%  of  our  total  2014
budget in the Rocky Mountain region.  Projected drilling,  completion and infrastructure expenditures  in
the Wattenberg Field will account for  approximately 99% of  the  capital allocated to the Rocky
Mountain region. In the Mid-Continent region, we  plan to spend approximately $75 million to
$85 million during 2014. In total, we  plan  to  spend  approximately $545  million  on operated  drilling and
completion activities with the remainder  allocated to non-operated drilling and completion activities,
field infrastructure and maintenance operations. The ultimate amount of  capital we will expend may
fluctuate materially based on, among other things,  market  conditions, the success of our drilling results
as the year progresses and changes in the  borrowing base under  our revolving credit facility.

Derivative Activity

In addition to supply and demand, oil and gas prices are affected by  seasonal, economic and
geo-political factors that we can neither control nor  predict. We attempt to mitigate a portion of  our
price risk through the use of derivative  contracts.

As of December 31, 2013, we had the following  economic derivatives in  place, which  settle

monthly:

Settlement
Period

Derivative
Instrument

Total Volumes
(Bbls/MMBtu
per day)

Average
Fixed Price

Average
Short Floor
Price

Average Average
Ceiling
Price

Floor
Price

$96.97
$96.20
$93.04
$93.04

$86.33 $97.09
$86.55 $96.72
$86.16 $96.57
$86.16 $96.57
$85.00 $99.50
$83.33 $94.12

$60.00
$66.67

Fair Market
Value  of
Asset
(Liability)

$ (403,499)
(288,370)
(518,444)
205,179
(1,338,410)
(1,252,787)
(615,971)
(68,724)
(303,314)
(782,385)

$(5,366,725)

$ 3.50
$ 3.50

$ 4.00 $ 4.75 $
$ 4.00 $ 4.75

$

122,173
(127,895)
(5,722)

$(5,372,447)

Oil
1Q 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Swap
2Q 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Swap
3Q 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Swap
4Q 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Swap
1Q 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Collar
2Q 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Collar
3Q 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Collar
4Q 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Collar
2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-Way  Collar
2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-Way  Collar

3,133
4,126
3,870
3,870
5,617
4,846
4,326
4,326
1,000
4,500

Gas
2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-Way  Collar
2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-Way  Collar

15,000
15,000

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

16

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

As of the date of filing we had the following economic  derivatives in place,  which settle monthly:

Settlement
Period

Derivative
Instrument

Total Volumes
(Bbls/MMBtu
per day)

Average
Fixed Price

Average
Short  Floor
Price

Average
Floor
Price

Average
Ceiling
Price

Oil
Swap
1Q 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Swap
2Q 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Swap
3Q 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4Q 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Swap
1Q 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Collar
2Q 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Collar
3Q 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Collar
4Q 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Collar
1Q 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2Q - 4Q 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gas
1Q 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2Q - 4Q 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3-Way  collar
3-Way  Collar
3-Way  Collar

3-Way  Collar
3-Way  Collar
3-Way  Collar

$96.97
$96.20
$93.04
$93.04

3,133
4,126
3,870
3,870
5,617
4,846
4,326
4,326
1,000
2,000
4,500

22,500
30,000
15,000

$86.33
$86.55
$86.16
$86.16
$85.00
$87.68
$83.33

$ 4.13
$ 4.21
$ 4.00

$97.09
$96.72
$96.57
$96.57
$99.50
$99.75
$94.12

$ 4.78
$ 4.81
$ 4.75

$60.00
$65.00
$66.67

$ 3.56
$ 3.63
$ 3.50

We  do not apply hedge accounting treatment to any  commodity derivative contracts. Settlements
on these contracts and adjustments to  fair value are shown as a component of derivative gain (loss).
See Note  12—Derivatives to our consolidated  financial  statements for additional  information regarding
our  derivative instruments.

Title to Properties

Our properties are subject to customary royalty interest, overriding royalty interests, obligations

incident to operating agreements, liens for  current taxes and other industry-related  constraints,
including leasehold restrictions. We do  not  believe  that any of these burdens materially  interfere  with
our  use of the properties in the operation of our  business. We believe that we  have generally
satisfactory title to or rights in all of  our producing properties. Generally, we undergo thorough title
review and receive title opinions from  legal  counsel before we commence drilling operations, subject to
the availability and examination of accurate title records.  Although in certain cases, title to our
properties is subject to interpretation of multiple  conveyances, deeds, reservations,  and other
constraints, we believe that none of these will materially detract from the  value of our properties, from
our  interest therein or will materially  interfere with the operation of our business.

Competition

The oil and natural gas industry is highly competitive and we compete with a substantial number

of other companies that have greater resources.  Many of  these  companies explore for, produce and
market oil and natural gas, carry on refining operations  and market the resultant products on a
worldwide basis. The primary areas in which  we encounter substantial competition  are in locating and
acquiring desirable leasehold acreage for our drilling  and development operations, locating and
acquiring attractive producing oil and  gas properties, attracting  and retaining qualified  personnel, and
obtaining transportation for the oil and gas  we produce in certain regions. There is also competition
between producers of oil and gas and other industries producing alternative  energy and fuel.
Furthermore, competitive conditions  may be substantially affected by various forms  of energy legislation
and/or regulation considered from time  to time  by the government of the  United States; however, it is
not possible to predict the nature of any such legislation  or regulation that may ultimately be adopted
or its effects upon our future operations.  Such laws and regulations  may, however, substantially  increase

17

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

the costs of exploring for, developing or producing gas  and oil and may prevent or  delay the
commencement or continuation of a given operation. The effect  of these  risks cannot  be  accurately
predicted.

Further, oil prices  and natural gas prices do not necessarily fluctuate  in direct  relationship to each
other. Because approximately 67% of our estimated proved reserves  as of December 31, 2013  were oil
and natural gas liquids reserves, our  financial results are more sensitive  to  movements in  oil prices.
During  the year ended December 31,  2013,  the daily NYMEX WTI oil spot price  ranged  from a high
of $110.53 per Bbl to a low of $86.68  per  Bbl, and  the NYMEX natural gas HH spot price ranged
from a high of $4.52 per MMBtu to a low of $3.08 per MMBtu. As of the date of filing,  we had
commodity price derivative agreements for  2014 on  approximately 60% of our anticipated  production
based on the mid-point of our guidance range of 23,000  Boe/d to 25,000 Boe/d.

Insurance  Matters

As is common in the oil and gas industry, we will not insure fully against  all  risks associated with

our  business either because such insurance  is not available or because premium  costs are  considered
prohibitive. A loss not fully covered by  insurance could have  a  materially adverse effect on our financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.

Regulation of the Oil and Natural Gas  Industry

Our operations are substantially affected by federal, state  and local laws and regulations.  In
particular, oil and natural gas production and related  operations are, or have  been, subject to price
controls, taxes and numerous other laws and  regulations.  All of the jurisdictions in which we own or
operate properties for oil and natural gas production have  statutory provisions regulating the
exploration for and production of oil  and  natural gas,  including  provisions related to permits for  the
drilling  of wells, bonding requirements to drill  or operate wells,  the location of wells, the method  of
drilling  and casing wells, the surface  use  and  restoration of properties  upon which wells are  drilled,
sourcing and disposal of water used in  the drilling and completion process, and  the abandonment of
wells. Our operations are also subject  to various  conservation laws and regulations. These include
regulation of the size of drilling and  spacing  units or proration units,  the number of wells  which may be
drilled in an area, and the unitization  or pooling of oil  and natural  gas wells, and regulations  that
generally prohibit the venting or flaring of natural gas and that impose certain requirements regarding
the ratability or fair apportionment of  production from fields and individual wells.

Failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations can  result in substantial penalties. Our

competitors in the oil and natural gas industry are subject to the same  regulatory requirements and
restrictions that affect our operations.  The regulatory burden  on the  industry  increases the cost of
doing business and affects profitability.  Although we believe we are in substantial  compliance with  all
applicable laws and regulations, such laws and regulations are  frequently amended or reinterpreted.
Therefore, we are  unable to predict the future  costs or  impact of compliance. Additional  proposals and
proceedings that affect the natural gas industry are regularly considered  by  Congress, the states, the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (‘‘FERC’’), and the courts. We cannot  predict when  or whether
any such proposals or proceedings may  become effective.

We  believe we are in substantial compliance with currently  applicable laws and  regulations and that

continued substantial compliance with  existing requirements will  not  have a material adverse effect on
our  financial position, cash flows or results of operations. However, current regulatory requirements
may change, currently unforeseen incidents may  occur or  past non-compliance with laws or regulations
may be discovered.

18

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Regulation of transportation of oil

Our sales of crude oil are affected by the availability,  terms and cost of  transportation. Interstate

transportation of oil by pipeline is regulated by FERC  pursuant to the Interstate Commerce Act
(‘‘ICA’’),  the Energy Policy Act of 1992 and the rules  and regulations promulgated under those laws.
The ICA and its implementing regulations  require that tariff  rates for interstate service on oil pipelines,
including interstate pipelines that transport crude oil and refined products (collectively referred to as
‘‘petroleum pipelines’’) be just and reasonable and  non-discriminatory  and  that  such rates and terms
and conditions of service be filed with FERC.

Intrastate oil pipeline transportation rates are  subject to regulation  by state regulatory

commissions. The basis for intrastate oil pipeline regulation,  and  the  degree  of regulatory oversight and
scrutiny given to intrastate oil pipeline rates, varies  from state to state. Insofar as  effective interstate
and intrastate rates are equally applicable  to  all  comparable  shippers, we believe that the  regulation of
oil transportation rates will not affect  our operations in any way that is  of material difference from
those of our competitors who are similarly situated.

Regulation of transportation and sales of natural  gas

Historically, the transportation and sale for  resale of natural gas in interstate  commerce  have been

regulated by agencies of the U.S. federal  government, primarily FERC.  FERC  regulates  interstate
natural gas transportation rates and service conditions,  which affects the marketing of natural  gas that
we produce, as well as the revenues  we receive for sales of our natural gas.

In the past, the federal government has regulated the prices  at which  natural gas could be sold.
While sales by producers of natural gas  can currently be made  at uncontrolled market prices, Congress
could reenact price controls in the future. Deregulation of wellhead natural gas  sales began with the
enactment of the Natural Gas Policy  Act (‘‘NGPA’’)  and  culminated in adoption of the Natural Gas
Wellhead Decontrol Act which removed  controls affecting  wellhead sales of natural  gas effective
January 1, 1993. The transportation and  sale for resale of natural gas in interstate commerce is
regulated primarily under the Natural Gas Act (‘‘NGA’’), and  by regulations  and orders promulgated
under the NGA by FERC. In certain  limited  circumstances,  intrastate  transportation and wholesale
sales of natural gas may also be affected directly or indirectly by laws enacted by Congress  and by
FERC regulations.

FERC issued a series of orders in 1996 and 1997  to  implement its open access  policies.  As a result,

the interstate pipelines’ traditional role  as wholesalers  of  natural gas has been greatly reduced and
replaced by a structure under which pipelines provide transportation and storage service on an open
access basis to others who buy and sell natural gas. Although  FERC’s orders do not directly regulate
natural gas producers, they are intended to foster increased competition within  all  phases of the  natural
gas industry.

The Domenici Barton Energy Policy Act of 2005 (‘‘EP Act of 2005’’),  is a  comprehensive

compilation of tax incentives, authorized  appropriations for grants and guaranteed loans, and significant
changes to the statutory policy that affects all segments  of the energy  industry. Among other matters,
the EP Act of 2005 amends the NGA to add an anti-market manipulation  provision which makes it
unlawful for any entity to engage in prohibited behavior  to be prescribed  by  FERC. The EP Act of
2005 provides FERC with the power to assess civil  penalties  of  up to $1,000,000  per  day for  violations
of the NGA and increases FERC’s civil  penalty authority under the NGPA from $5,000  per  violation
per  day to $1,000,000 per violation per day. The civil  penalty provisions are  applicable to entities  that
engage in the sale of natural gas for  resale  in interstate commerce. On  January 19, 2006,  FERC issued
Order No. 670, a rule implementing  the anti-market manipulation provision of the EP Act of 2005, and
subsequently denied rehearing. The rules make it unlawful  to: (1) in connection with the  purchase  or
sale of natural gas subject to the jurisdiction  of  FERC, or  the purchase or sale of transportation more

19

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

accessible to natural gas services subject to the  jurisdiction of FERC,  for  any entity, directly  or
indirectly, to use or employ any device, scheme or artifice to defraud; (2)  to  make  any untrue
statement of material fact or omit to make any such  statement  necessary to  make the  statements made
not misleading; or (3) to engage in any act or  practice that  operates as  a  fraud or deceit upon any
person. The new anti-market manipulation rule does not apply to activities that relate only to intrastate
or other  non-jurisdictional sales or gathering, but  does apply to activities  of gas pipelines and storage
companies that provide interstate services, as well as otherwise non-jurisdictional  entities to the extent
the activities are conducted ‘‘in connection with’’ gas sales, purchases or transportation  subject to
FERC jurisdiction, which now includes  the annual reporting  requirements under Order  704. The
anti-market manipulation rule and enhanced civil penalty authority reflect an  expansion of  FERC’s
NGA enforcement authority.

Gathering service, which occurs upstream of jurisdictional transmission services, is regulated  by  the

states onshore and in state waters. Although its policy is still  in flux,  FERC  has reclassified certain
jurisdictional transmission facilities as non-jurisdictional gathering facilities, which has the  tendency to
increase our costs of getting gas to point of sale locations. State  regulation  of  natural gas  gathering
facilities generally includes various safety, environmental  and, in  some circumstances,  nondiscriminatory
take requirements. Although nondiscriminatory-take  regulation has  not  generally  been affirmatively
applied  by state agencies, natural gas  gathering may receive greater regulatory scrutiny in the future.

Section  1(b) of the NGA exempts natural gas gathering facilities  from  regulation by FERC as a

natural gas company under the NGA.  We believe that the  natural gas  pipelines in  our gathering
systems meet the traditional tests FERC has  used  to  establish a  pipeline’s  status  as a gatherer not
subject to regulation as a natural gas company. However, the distinction between FERC-regulated
transmission services and federally unregulated gathering services is the subject of ongoing litigation, so
the classification and regulation of our  gathering  facilities  are subject to change based on future
determinations by FERC, the courts  or  Congress.

Our sales of natural gas are also subject to requirements  under the Commodity Exchange Act
(‘‘CEA’’), and regulations promulgated  thereunder by  the Commodity  Futures Trading Commission
(‘‘CFTC’’). The CEA prohibits any person  from manipulating or  attempting to manipulate  the price of
any commodity in interstate commerce  or futures  on such commodity. The CEA also prohibits
knowingly delivering or causing to be delivered  false or misleading or knowingly  inaccurate  reports
concerning market information or conditions that affect  or tend to affect the  price of a commodity.

Intrastate natural gas transportation is also  subject to regulation  by state  regulatory  agencies. The
basis for intrastate regulation of natural gas  transportation and the  degree  of  regulatory oversight and
scrutiny given to intrastate natural gas pipeline rates and services varies  from state to state. Insofar  as
such regulation within a particular state will generally affect all  intrastate natural  gas shippers within
the state on a comparable basis, we believe that the regulation of similarly situated  intrastate natural
gas transportation in any states in which we  operate  and ship natural gas on an intrastate basis  will not
affect our operations in any way that  is of material  difference from those of our competitors. Like the
regulation of interstate transportation rates, the  regulation of intrastate transportation rates  affects the
marketing of natural gas that we produce, as  well as  the revenues we receive  for sales of our natural
gas.

Changes in law and to FERC policies and regulations may adversely  affect the  availability and
reliability of firm and/or interruptible  transportation service  on  interstate pipelines, and we  cannot
predict what future action FERC will take.  We do not believe, however,  that any regulatory changes
will affect us in a way that materially differs from the  way they will affect  other natural gas producers,
gatherers and marketers with which we compete.

20

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Regulation of production

The production of oil and natural gas is  subject to regulation  under a wide range of local, state

and federal statutes, rules, orders and regulations.  Federal, state and local statutes and  regulations
require permits for drilling operations, drilling bonds and reports concerning operations. The states in
which  we own and operate properties have regulations  governing conservation matters, including
provisions for the unitization or pooling of oil  and natural gas properties, the establishment of
maximum allowable rates of production from  oil and natural  gas wells, the regulation  of  well spacing,
and plugging and abandonment of wells.  The  effect of these regulations is to limit the  amount  of oil
and natural gas that we can produce from our wells and to limit the  number of wells or the locations at
which  we can drill, although we can apply for exceptions to such regulations or to have  reductions in
well spacing. Moreover, each state generally imposes a  production or severance tax with respect  to the
production and sale of oil, natural gas and natural  gas liquids within its jurisdiction.

We  own interests in properties located onshore  in three U.S. states. These  states regulate drilling
and operating activities by requiring, among other  things, permits for the drilling  of wells, maintaining
bonding requirements in order to drill  or  operate  wells, and  regulating the  location of wells,  the
method of drilling and casing wells, the surface use  and restoration of properties upon which  wells are
drilled and the plugging and abandonment of  wells. The laws of these states also govern  a number of
environmental and conservation matters, including the handling and disposing or  discharge of waste
materials, the size of drilling and spacing units  or proration units and the density  of wells that may  be
drilled, unitization and pooling of oil  and gas properties  and establishment of maximum rates  of
production from oil and gas wells. Some states  have the power  to  prorate  production to the  market
demand for oil and gas.

Regulation of derivatives and reporting of government payments

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection  Act (the ‘‘Dodd-Frank  Act’’) was

passed by Congress and signed into law in  July 2010. The Dodd-Frank Act  is designed  to  provide a
comprehensive framework for the regulation of the  over-the-counter derivatives market with the  intent
to provide greater transparency and reduction of risk between counterparties.  The Dodd-Frank Act
subjects swap dealers and major swap  participants to capital and margin  requirements and requires
many  derivative transactions to be cleared on  exchanges.  The  Dodd-Frank Act provides for a potential
exemption from these clearing and cash  collateral requirements for  commercial end-users. In addition,
in August 2012, the SEC issued a final rule under Section 1504  of the Dodd-Frank Act, Disclosure of
Payment  by Resource Extraction Issuers,  which would  have required resource extraction  issuers, such  as
us, to file annual reports that provide information about the type and total amount of  payments made
for each  project related to the commercial development of  oil,  natural gas, or minerals to each foreign
government and the federal government. In July 2013, the U.S. District  Court for the District of
Columbia vacated the rule, and the SEC has announced it will  not  appeal the court’s decision.
However, the SEC may propose revised resource  extraction  payments disclosure  rules  applicable  to our
business.

Environmental, Health and Safety Regulation

Our natural gas and oil exploration and production operations are subject to numerous  stringent
federal, regional, state and local statutes and regulations governing  safety and  health,  the discharge of
materials into the environmental or otherwise  relating  to  environmental protection,  some of  which carry
substantial administrative, civil and criminal  penalties for  failure to comply. These laws and regulations
may require the acquisition of permits  before  drilling or other  regulated  activity commences; restrict
the types, quantities and concentrations  of various substances that can be released  into  the environment
in connection with drilling, production and transporting through pipelines; govern  the sourcing and
disposal of water used in the drilling and completion  process; limit or prohibit drilling  activities in

21

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

certain areas and on certain lands lying within wilderness, wetlands, frontier and other protected areas;
require some form of remedial action  to prevent  or mitigate pollution from former operations  such as
plugging abandoned wells or closing earthen pits;  establish specific safety and health criteria  addressing
worker protection and impose substantial liabilities for pollution resulting  from operations  or failure to
comply  with regulatory filings. In addition, these laws  and regulations may restrict the rate of
production.

The following is a summary of the more significant existing  environmental and health and  safety
laws and regulations to which our business operations are subject and for which compliance may have a
material adverse impact on our capital  expenditures, results of operations or financial position.

Hazardous substances and waste handling

The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation  and  Liability  Act  of 1980

(‘‘CERCLA’’), also known as the Superfund law, and comparable state laws  impose liability without
regard to fault or the legality of the original  conduct on certain classes  of  persons who  are considered
to be responsible for the release of a  ‘‘hazardous substance’’ into the environment. These  persons
include current and prior owners or  operators of the  site where  the release  occurred and  entities that
disposed or arranged for the disposal of the hazardous substances found at  the site. Under CERCLA,
these ‘‘responsible persons’’ may be subject  to  strict,  joint  and several liability for the costs  of cleaning
up the hazardous substances that have  been released  into  the environment,  for damages to natural
resources, and for the costs of certain health studies, and it  is not uncommon for neighboring
landowners and other third parties to file claims for personal injury  and property damage allegedly
caused by the hazardous substances released  into  the environment.  We are  able to control directly  the
operation of only those wells with respect  to  which we act as operator. Notwithstanding our lack of
direct control over wells operated by others, the failure of an operator other than  us to comply with
applicable environmental regulations  may,  in certain circumstances, be attributed to us. We generate
materials in the course of our operations  that may be regulated as hazardous  substances but  we are  not
aware of any liabilities for which we may be held  responsible  that would materially and adversely affect
us.

The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act  (‘‘RCRA’’),  and analogous state laws, impose
requirements on the generation, handling,  storage, treatment and disposal  of nonhazardous and
hazardous solid wastes. RCRA specifically excludes  certain drilling fluids, produced  waters, and other
wastes associated with the exploration, development, or production of  crude oil, natural  gas or
geothermal energy from regulation as hazardous wastes. However,  these wastes may  be  regulated by
the EPA or state agencies under RCRA’s less  stringent nonhazardous solid waste provisions, state  laws
or other  federal laws. Moreover, it is possible that these  particular oil  and natural gas exploration,
development and production wastes now classified as  nonhazardous  solid  wastes could be classified as
hazardous wastes in the future. A loss of  the RCRA exclusion for drilling  fluids,  produced waters and
related wastes could result in an increase in our costs to manage and  dispose of generated wastes,
which  could have a material adverse effect on our  results of operations  and financial position. In
addition, in the course of our operations, we generate some amounts of  ordinary industrial wastes, such
as paint wastes, waste solvents, laboratory wastes and waste compressor oils that are regulated  as
hazardous wastes.  Although the costs  of managing hazardous waste may  be significant, we  do  not
believe that our costs in this regard are  materially more  burdensome  than those for similarly  situated
companies.

We  currently own or lease, and have in the  past owned or  leased, properties  that  have been used

for numerous years to explore and produce oil and natural gas.  Although  we have utilized operating
and disposal practices that were standard in  the industry at the time, hydrocarbons and wastes may
have been disposed of or released on  or  under the properties owned or leased by us or  on or under the
other locations where these hydrocarbons and wastes  have been  taken  for treatment or disposal. In

22

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

addition, certain of these properties have  been operated  by third parties whose treatment and disposal
or release of hydrocarbons and wastes  were not under  our control. These properties and  wastes
disposed thereon may be subject to CERCLA, RCRA and  analogous  state laws. Under these laws, we
could be required to remove or remediate  previously  disposed wastes (including  wastes disposed  of or
released by prior owners or operators), to clean up contaminated  property (including groundwater
contaminated by prior owners or operators), to pay for  damages for the loss or impairment  of  natural
resources, and to take measures to prevent future contamination from our operations.

Pipeline safety and maintenance

Pipelines, gathering systems and terminal  operations are subject to increasingly strict safety laws
and regulations. Both the transportation and storage of refined  products and crude oil involve a  risk
that hazardous liquids may be released  into the environment, potentially  causing harm to the  public or
the environment. In turn, such incidents  may  result in  substantial  expenditures for response actions,
significant government penalties, liability to government agencies for natural resources damages, and
significant business interruption. The U.S.  Department of Transportation (‘‘DOT’’)  has adopted safety
regulations with respect to the design, construction,  operation,  maintenance, inspection  and
management of our pipeline and storage  facilities.  These regulations contain requirements for the
development and implementation of  pipeline  integrity management programs, which include  the
inspection and testing of pipelines and the correction of anomalies. These regulations also require  that
pipeline operation and maintenance personnel  meet  certain qualifications and that pipeline operators
develop comprehensive spill response plans.

There have been recent initiatives to strengthen and expand pipeline  safety regulations  and to
increase penalties for violations. The  Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty, and Job Creation Act  was
signed into law in early 2012. In addition, the  Pipeline and  Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
has issued new rules to strengthen federal pipeline safety enforcement programs.

Air  emissions

The Clean Air Act (‘‘CAA’’) and comparable state laws  and regulations restrict the  emission  of air

pollutants from many sources, including  oil  and gas  operations, and  impose  various monitoring and
reporting requirements. These laws and  regulations may require us  to  obtain  pre-approval for the
construction or modification of certain projects or  facilities expected to produce or significantly increase
air emissions, obtain and comply with  stringent  air  permit  requirements or utilize specific  equipment or
technologies to control emissions. Obtaining required air permits can  significantly  delay the
development of certain oil and natural gas projects. Over the next  several years, we may be required to
incur certain capital expenditures for  air  pollution control equipment or other  air  emissions  related
issues.

For example, on August 16, 2012, the EPA  published final rules under the CAA that subject oil
and natural gas production, processing,  transmission and storage operations to regulation under  the
New Source Performance Standards and  National Emission Standards for Hazardous  Air  Pollutants
programs. With regards to production  activities, these final  rules require, among other things, the
reduction of volatile organic compound emissions from three subcategories  of  fractured and refractured
gas wells for which well completion operations are conducted:  wildcat (exploratory) and delineation gas
wells; low reservoir pressure non-wildcat and non-delineation gas wells; and  all  ‘‘other’’  fractured and
refractured gas wells. All three subcategories  of  wells must route  flow back emissions to a gathering
line or be captured and combusted using a combustion device such as  a flare after October  15, 2012.
However, the ‘‘other’’ wells must use  reduced emission  completions, also  known as ‘‘green
completions,’’ with or without combustion devices, after  January 1,  2015. These  regulations also
establish specific new requirements regarding emissions from production-related wet seal  and
reciprocating compressors effective October 15, 2012  and  from pneumatic controllers and storage

23

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

vessels, effective October 15, 2013. The  EPA  received  numerous requests for reconsideration of  these
rules from both industry and the environmental community,  and court challenges to the  rules  were also
filed. The EPA issued revised rules in  2013 in response to  some of these requests. For example,  on
September 23, 2013, the EPA published a  final  rule  extending the compliance  dates for certain groups
of storage vessels to April 15, 2014 and April 15, 2015.

In February 2014, the Colorado Air Quality  Control Commission (‘‘AQCC’’) is considering  the

adoption of new and revised air quality regulations that would  impose stringent new requirements to
control emissions from existing and new oil  and  gas facilities in Colorado. The proposed  regulations
being considered by the AQCC would impose  new control, monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting
requirements on oil and gas operators  in  Colorado. For example, the AQCC will consider proposed
Storage Tank Emission Management (‘‘STEM’’) requirements for certain new and existing  storage
tanks. If adopted, the STEM requirements  may  require us to install  costly emission control technologies
at our new and existing well production facilities.  The  AQCC is also considering a Leak Detection and
Repair (‘‘LDAR’’) program for well production facilities and compressor stations. The proposed LDAR
program primarily targets hydrocarbon  (i.e.,  methane) emissions  from  the oil and gas  sector in
Colorado and would represent significant new use of state authority regarding these emissions.

Compliance with these and other air  pollution control and  permitting requirements  has the

potential to delay the development of  oil  and  natural gas  projects and increase our costs of
development and production, which costs  could be significant. However, we do not currently believe
that compliance with such requirements  will have a material adverse effect on  our  operations.

Climate change

In response to findings that emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and other greenhouse gases

(‘‘GHGs’’) present an endangerment to public  health and the environment,  the EPA has adopted
regulations under existing provisions  of  the CAA that, among other things, establish Prevention of
Significant Deterioration (‘‘PSD’’) construction and  Title V  operating permit requirements for  certain
large stationary sources that are potential major  sources  of  GHG  emissions.  Facilities required to
obtain PSD permits for their GHG emissions will also be required to meet ‘‘best  available  control
technology’’ standards that will be established  by  the states or, in some cases, by the  EPA on  a
case-by-case basis. These EPA rulemakings could adversely affect our operations and  restrict or delay
our  ability to obtain air permits for new or  modified  sources. In  addition, the  EPA has  adopted rules
requiring the monitoring and reporting of  GHG from specified  onshore and offshore oil  and gas
production sources in the United States on  an annual  basis, which include certain of our operations.
We  are monitoring GHG emissions from our operations  in accordance with the GHG emissions
reporting rule and believe that our monitoring  activities are in substantial compliance  with applicable
reporting  obligations.

While Congress has, from time to time, considered legislation to reduce emissions of GHGs,  there

has not been significant activity in the form  of adopted  legislation to reduce GHG emissions at  the
federal level in recent years. In the absence of such federal climate legislation, a number of state and
regional efforts have emerged that are aimed at tracking and/or reducing GHG emissions by means of
cap and trade programs that typically require major  sources  of  GHG  emissions,  such as  electric  power
plants, to acquire and surrender emission allowances in  return for emitting those  GHGs. If  Congress
undertakes comprehensive tax reform in the coming year, it is possible that such reform  may include a
carbon tax, which could impose additional  direct costs  on operations  and  reduce  demand for  refined
products. President Obama has indicated that climate change and GHG regulation is a significant
priority for his second term. The President  issued  a Climate Action Plan in June  2013, calling for,
among other things, a reduction in methane emissions from  the oil and gas industry.  Additionally, as
discussed above, the state of Colorado  intends to consider new air quality regulations in February 2014,
targeting methane and ethane emissions from  well production facilities and compressor stations.

24

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Although it is not possible at this time to predict how legislation  or  new regulations that may  be
adopted to address GHG emissions would impact our business,  any such future  laws  and regulations
imposing reporting obligations on, or  limiting emissions of GHGs from, our equipment  and operations
could require us to incur costs to reduce emissions of GHGs associated  with our operations.  Severe
limitations on GHG emissions could  adversely affect  demand  for the oil  and natural gas we produce.

Most recently, on October 15, 2013, the United States Supreme Court in Utility Air Regulatory

Group v. EPA, No. 12-1146, granted  a  petition for certiorari to review the United States  Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit’s opinion  and order upholding  EPA’s GHG-related
regulations. The issue on review to the  United States Supreme Court is whether  EPA correctly
determined that its regulation of GHGs  from mobile sources  triggered permitting requirements under
the Clean Air Act for stationary sources of GHG emissions.  The Court’s decision is  expected in  Spring
or Summer 2014, and could impact the scope of GHG regulation both  at the  federal and state  levels.

Finally, it should be noted that some scientists  have concluded that increasing concentrations of
GHGs in the earth’s atmosphere may produce climate  changes  that have significant physical  effects,
such as increased frequency and severity of storms, floods and other  climatic  events; if any such effects
were to occur, they could have an adverse effect on  our  exploration and production operations.

Water discharges

The Federal Water Pollution Control Act  or the Clean Water Act (‘‘CWA’’) and analogous state

laws impose restrictions and controls  regarding the  discharge of pollutants into certain  surface  waters.
The discharge of pollutants into regulated waters  is prohibited,  except in accordance  with the terms of
a permit issued by the EPA or underlying state. The discharge  of dredge  and fill material in regulated
waters, including wetlands, is also prohibited  unless authorized by  a permit issued by the  U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (‘‘Corps’’). Obtaining permits  has the potential to delay the development  of natural
gas and oil projects. These laws and  any implementing  regulations provide  for administrative, civil and
criminal penalties for any unauthorized  discharges of oil  and other substances in  certain quantities that
may impose substantial potential liability  for the costs of removal, remediation  and damages. The EPA
and Corps have recently submitted to  the White House Office  of Management and Budget for review a
proposed rule that would define the scope of  jurisdictional waters of the  United States under the CWA.
An expansive definition of such waters could  affect our ability to operate in  certain areas and may
increase our costs of operations and  permitting.

Pursuant to these laws and regulations, we may be required to obtain and maintain approvals or

permits for the discharge of wastewater or storm water and are required to develop and  implement
spill prevention, control and countermeasure plans, also referred to as ‘‘SPCC plans,’’ in connection
with on-site storage of significant quantities of oil.  We  believe that we maintain all required  discharge
permits necessary to conduct our operations, and further believe we are in substantial compliance with
the terms thereof. As properties are  acquired, we  determine the  need for new or updated SPCC plans
and, where necessary, will develop or update such  plans to implement physical and  operation controls,
the costs of which are not expected to  be  substantial.

Endangered Species Act

The federal Endangered Species Act restricts activities that may  affect  endangered and  threatened

species or their habitats. Some of our  facilities  may be located in areas that are designated as habitat
for endangered or threatened species.  The designation of previously unidentified endangered  or
threatened species could cause us to incur  additional costs or become subject to operating  restrictions
or bans in the affected areas.

25

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Employee health and safety

We  are subject to a number of federal and  state laws and regulations, including the federal

Occupational Safety and Health Act  (the ‘‘OSH Act’’), and comparable state  statutes, whose purpose is
to protect the health and safety of workers.  In  addition,  the OSH Act’s hazard communication
standard, the EPA community right-to-know regulations under  Title III of the federal Superfund
Amendment and Reauthorization Act and comparable  state statutes  require that information be
maintained concerning hazardous materials  used  or produced in our operations, and that this
information be provided to employees,  state and local government  authorities and  citizens.

Hydraulic  fracturing

Regulations relating to hydraulic fracturing. We are subject to extensive federal, state, and local

laws and regulations concerning health, safety, and environmental protection. Government authorities
frequently add to those requirements,  and both oil  and gas development generally and hydraulic
fracturing specifically are receiving increasing regulatory  attention. Our operations utilize hydraulic
fracturing, an important and commonly  used  process in the completion of oil and natural gas wells in
low-permeability formations. Hydraulic fracturing  involves  the injection of water,  proppant,  and
chemicals under pressure into rock formations to stimulate hydrocarbon production.

States have historically regulated oil and gas exploration and production activity, including

hydraulic fracturing. State governments  in  the areas where we  operate have adopted or are considering
adopting additional requirements relating  to  hydraulic fracturing that could restrict its use in certain
circumstances or make it more costly to utilize. Such  measures  may  address any risk to drinking water,
the potential for hydrocarbon migration  and disclosure  of the chemicals used in  fracturing. Colorado,
for example, comprehensively updated its oil and gas regulations in 2008 and  adopted significant
additional amendments in 2011 and 2013. Among  other  things, the updated and amended regulations
require operators to reduce methane emissions associated with hydraulic  fracturing, compile and report
additional information regarding well bore integrity, publicly disclose the chemical ingredients used in
hydraulic fracturing, increase the minimum distance  between occupied structures  and oil and  gas wells,
undertake additional mitigation for nearby  residents, and  implement additional  groundwater testing.
The State is also considering  new regulations  for air emissions from oil and gas operations  as well as
potential legislation increasing the monetary penalties for regulatory violations. Any enforcement
actions or requirements of additional studies or investigations by governmental authorities where  we
operate could increase our operating  costs and cause  delays  or interruptions of our operations.

The federal Safe Drinking Water Act (‘‘SDWA’’) and comparable state statutes may restrict the

disposal, treatment or release of water  produced or used during oil and gas development. Subsurface
emplacement of fluids, primarily via disposal wells  or enhanced oil recovery  (‘‘EOR’’) wells, is governed
by federal or state regulatory authorities  that, in some cases, include the state oil and gas regulatory or
the state’s environmental authority. The federal Energy Policy Act of 2005 amended  the Underground
Injection Control (‘‘UIC’’), provisions of the SDWA to expressly exclude certain hydraulic fracturing
from the definition of ‘‘underground  injection,’’ but  disposal of hydraulic  fracturing fluids and produced
water or their injection for EOR is not excluded. The U.S. Senate and  House  of Representatives have
considered bills to repeal this SDWA exemption for hydraulic fracturing. If enacted,  hydraulic
fracturing operations could be required to meet  additional federal permitting and financial assurance
requirements, adhere to certain construction specifications, fulfill monitoring, reporting, and
recordkeeping obligations, meet plugging and abandonment requirements, and provide additional  public
disclosure of chemicals used in the fracturing process  as  a consequence of  additional SDWA permitting
requirements.

Federal agencies are also considering additional  regulation of hydraulic fracturing. The EPA  has

prepared draft guidance for issuing underground  injection permits that would regulate hydraulic

26

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

fracturing using diesel fuel, where EPA has permitting authority  under the SDWA; this guidance
eventually could encourage other regulatory  authorities to adopt permitting and  other restrictions  on
the use of hydraulic fracturing. In addition,  on October 21, 2011, EPA  announced its intention  to
propose regulations by 2014 under the federal  Clean  Water Act to regulate  wastewater  discharges from
hydraulic fracturing and other natural  gas production. EPA is  also  collecting information  as part of a
nationwide study into the effects of hydraulic  fracturing on drinking water.  EPA issued a  progress
report regarding the study in December 2012,  which described generally the continuing focus  of  the
study, but did not provide any data, findings,  or conclusions regarding the safety of hydraulic fracturing
operations. EPA intends to issue a final draft report for peer  review and comment in 2014.  The  results
of this study, which is still ongoing, could  result in  additional regulations, which  could  lead  to
operational burdens similar to those  described  above. EPA also has initiated a  stakeholder and
potential rulemaking process under the  Toxic Substances Control Act  (‘‘TSCA’’) to obtain data on
chemical substances and mixtures used  in hydraulic fracturing, and recently published in the Federal
Register a petition from national environmental advocacy groups seeking  to  include the oil  and gas
sector in the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI)  reporting program  established for many industries under
TSCA. The United States Department  of the Interior has also  proposed a new rule regulating hydraulic
fracturing activities on federal lands,  including  requirements  for disclosure, well bore  integrity and
handling of flowback water. And the  U.S. Occupational  Safety and  Health Administration has proposed
stricter standards for worker exposure to silica, which would apply to use of  sand  as a proppant for
hydraulic fracturing.

Apart from these ongoing federal and state initiatives, local governments  are adopting new

requirements on hydraulic fracturing and other oil and gas operations.  Some counties  in Colorado, for
instance, have amended their land use  regulations to impose new requirements on oil and  gas
development, while other local governments have  entered memoranda of  agreement with oil and gas
producers to accomplish the same objective. Beyond that, in 2012, Longmont, Colorado prohibited the
use of hydraulic fracturing. The oil and gas  industry  and the  State  are challenging that ban—and the
authority of local jurisdictions to regulate  oil and gas development—in  court. In November  2013, four
other Colorado cities and counties passed voter initiatives  either  placing a moratorium on hydraulic
fracturing or banning new oil and gas development.  These initiatives too are the subject of pending
legal challenge. While these initiatives cover areas with little recent  or ongoing oil and gas
development, they could lead opponents  of  hydraulic fracturing to push  for statewide  referendums,
especially in Colorado.

At this time, it is not possible to estimate the potential impact  on our business of recent state  and

local actions or the enactment of additional federal or state legislation or regulations affecting  hydraulic
fracturing. The adoption of future federal, state or local laws or implementing regulations imposing
new environmental obligations on, or  otherwise  limiting, our operations could  make  it more  difficult
and more expensive to complete oil and  natural gas  wells, increase our costs of compliance and  doing
business, delay or prevent the development of  certain resources (including especially shale  formations
that are not commercial without the  use of hydraulic fracturing),  or  alter the  demand for  and
consumption of our products and services.  We  cannot assure you that any such outcome  would not be
material, and any such outcome could have a material  and adverse  impact  on our cash flows  and
results of operations.

Our use of hydraulic fracturing. We use hydraulic fracturing as a means to maximize production of

oil and gas from formations having low permeability  such that natural flow is restricted.  Fracture
stimulation has been used for decades in both the Rocky  Mountains and Mid-Continent. In the Rocky
Mountains, other companies in the oil and gas  industry  have fracture stimulated tens of  thousands of
wells since the mid-1980s. We and our  predecessor companies  have completed over 373  fracture
stimulations since acquiring assets in the  Wattenberg Field  in 1999. At our Dorcheat Macedonia
property in the Mid-Continent region,  fracture stimulation  has been performed since the 1970s  and has

27

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

been used more universally since the  early 1990s. We and our predecessor companies have  completed
over 140 fracture stimulations since acquiring our Dorcheat Macedonia properties in  mid-2008. Typical
hydraulic fracturing treatments are made  up of water, chemical additives  and sand. We utilize major
hydraulic fracturing service companies who track and report all additive chemicals that are  used  in
fracturing as required by the appropriate  government agencies. Each of these companies  fracture
stimulate a multitude of wells for the  industry each year. For  as long as we have owned and operated
properties subject to hydraulic fracturing,  there have  not  been any  material incidents, citations or suits
related to fracturing operations or related to environmental  concerns from fracturing operations.

We  periodically review our plans and policies regarding oil and gas operations, including hydraulic

fracturing, in order to minimize any potential environmental impact.  We adhere  to  applicable  legal
requirements and industry practices for  groundwater protection.  Our operations are subject to close
supervision by state and federal regulators  (including the Bureau of Land Management with respect to
federal acreage), who frequently inspect our  fracturing operations.

We  strive to minimize water usage in  our fracture  stimulation designs. Water recovered from our

hydraulic fracturing operations is disposed of in  a way that does not impact surface waters.  We dispose
of our recovered water by means of approved disposal or injection wells.

National Environmental Policy Act

Natural gas and oil exploration and  production  activities on federal  lands are subject to the

National Environmental Policy Act (‘‘NEPA’’). NEPA  requires  federal agencies,  including the
Departments of Interior and Agriculture, to evaluate major agency actions  having the  potential  to
significantly impact the environment.  In  the course of such evaluations, an agency prepares  an
Environmental Assessment to evaluate  the potential  direct, indirect and  cumulative  impacts  of a
proposed project. If impacts are considered  significant, the  agency  will prepare a more detailed
environmental impact study that is made  available for  public  review and comment.  All of our current
exploration and production activities,  as  well  as proposed exploration and development plans, on
federal lands require governmental permits that are subject to the requirements of NEPA.  This
environmental impact assessment process has the potential to delay or limit, or increase the cost  of, the
development of natural gas and oil projects.  Authorizations under NEPA also are subject  to  protest,
appeal or litigation, which can delay or  halt projects.

Oil Pollution Act

The Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (‘‘OPA’’)  establishes strict liability  for owners and operators  of

facilities that are the site of a release  of oil into waters of  the  U.S.  The  OPA and its  associated
regulations impose a variety of requirements on responsible parties related to the  prevention of oil
spills and liability for damages resulting  from  such spills. A ‘‘responsible party’’ under the OPA  includes
owners and operators of certain onshore facilities  from which a release may affect waters  of  the U.S.
The OPA assigns liability to each responsible  party for oil  cleanup costs and a variety of public and
private  damages. While liability limits  apply  in some circumstances, a party  cannot take  advantage of
liability limits if the spill was caused  by  gross negligence  or  willful  misconduct or  resulted from
violation of a federal safety, construction  or operating  regulation. If the party fails to report a spill or
to cooperate fully in the cleanup, liability limits likewise  do not apply. Few defenses exist to the  liability
imposed by the OPA. The OPA imposes  ongoing requirements on a responsible party, including the
preparation of oil spill response plans  and proof  of  financial  responsibility to cover  environmental
cleanup and restoration costs that could be incurred in connection with an oil  spill.

28

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

State laws

Our properties located in Colorado are subject to the authority of the  COGCC, as well as  other
state agencies. The COGCC recently approved  new  rules regarding minimum setbacks and groundwater
monitoring that are intended to prevent or mitigate environmental impacts of oil and gas  development
and include the permitting of wells. The COGCC also  recently approved  new rules regarding  reporting
requirements for spills or releases of exploration and production waste or produced fluids. Depending
on how these and any other new rules  are  applied,  they could add substantial increases  in well costs for
our  Colorado operations. The rules could also impact  our  ability and extend the time necessary to
obtain drilling permits, which would create  substantial uncertainty about our  ability to meet future
drilling  plans and thus production and  capital expenditure targets. The COGCC has also  recently
received a petition for rulemaking requesting that the  COGCC  promulgate certain rules that would
require an evaluation of the impacts of oil and gas drilling on trust resources  and human  health
according to the best available science  before issuing any permits  for oil and gas exploration and
drilling. The COGCC intends to consider  the petition in  March 2014.

Employees

As of December 31, 2013, we employed 236 people and also  utilize the  services  of  independent
contractors to perform various field and  other  services. Our future  success will depend  partially  on our
ability to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel.  We  are not a  party  to  any collective
bargaining agreements and have not  experienced any strikes or work stoppages. We consider our
relations with our employees to be satisfactory.

Offices

As of December 31, 2013, we leased 57,454  square  feet of office space in Denver,  Colorado
at 410 17th Street, where our principal offices are located.  We  also  have leases for field offices in
Houston, Texas, Bakersfield, California, Stamps,  Arkansas and Kersey, Colorado totaling 12,682 square
feet.

Available  information

We  are required to file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and  other
information with the SEC. You may read and  copy any documents filed by us with the SEC at the
SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F  Street,  N.E.,  Washington, D.C.  20549. You may obtain
information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC  at 1-800-SEC-0330.
Our filings with the SEC are also available to the public from commercial document retrieval services
and at the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.

Our common stock is listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol

‘‘BCEI.’’ Our reports, proxy statements and other information filed with the SEC can also be inspected
and copied at the  New York Stock Exchange, 20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005.

We  also make available on our website  at http://www.bonanzacrk.com all of the documents  that  we

file with the SEC, free of charge, as  soon  as  reasonably practicable after we electronically file  such
material with the SEC. Information contained  on our website, other  than the documents listed below, is
not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Our business involves a high degree  of risk.  If any of  the following risks, or any risk described
elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form  10-K, actually occurs, our  business,  financial condition  or
results of operations could suffer. The risks described below are not the only ones facing us.  Additional
risks not  presently known to us or which  we currently consider immaterial also may adversely affect us.

29

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Risks Related to Our Business

A decline in oil and, to a lesser extent, natural  gas  prices  may adversely  affect our business, financial
condition or results of operations and our  ability to meet our  capital expenditure obligations or targets  and
financial commitments.

The price we receive for our oil and,  to  a lesser extent, natural gas,  heavily influences our revenue,

profitability, access to capital and future  rate of growth. Oil and natural gas are commodities  and,
therefore, their prices are subject to  wide fluctuations in response to relatively minor changes in  supply
and demand. Historically, the markets for oil  and  natural gas have been  volatile. These markets will
likely continue to be volatile in the future. The prices  we receive for our production,  and the  levels of
our  production, depend on numerous  factors beyond our control.  These factors  include the following:

• worldwide and regional economic conditions impacting the global supply and  demand for  oil and

natural gas;

• the actions of OPEC;

• the price and quantity of imports of foreign  oil and natural  gas;

• political conditions in or affecting other oil-producing and natural  gas-producing countries,

including the current conflicts in the Middle East and conditions  in South America and  Russia;

• the level of global oil and natural gas exploration and production;

• the level of global oil and natural gas inventories;

• localized supply and demand fundamentals and transportation availability;

• weather conditions and natural disasters;

• domestic and foreign governmental regulations;

• speculation as to the future price  of  oil and  the speculative  trading  of oil and natural  gas futures

contracts;

• price and availability of competitors’ supplies of oil  and natural gas;

• technological advances affecting energy consumption; and

• the price and availability of alternative fuels.

Substantially all of our production is sold  to  purchasers under short-term (less than 12-month)
contracts at market based prices. Lower oil and natural gas  prices will reduce our cash flows, borrowing
ability and the present value of our reserves.  See  Our exploration, development and exploitation projects
require substantial capital expenditures.  Lower  oil and natural  gas prices  may also reduce the amount of
oil and natural gas that we can produce economically and may affect our proved  reserves.  See also The
present value of future net revenues from our proved reserves will not  necessarily be the same as the current
market value of our estimated oil and  natural  gas reserves  below.

Further, oil prices  and natural gas prices do not necessarily fluctuate  in direct  relationship to each
other. Because approximately 67% of our estimated proved reserves  as of December 31, 2013  were oil
and natural gas liquids, our financial results are more sensitive  to  movements in  oil prices.  The price of
oil has been extremely volatile and we  expect  this  volatility  to  continue. During the year ended
December 31, 2013, the daily NYMEX WTI oil spot price ranged from a  high of $110.53  per  Bbl to a
low of $86.68 per Bbl and the NYMEX  natural gas Henry Hub spot price  ranged from  a high of $4.52
per  MMBtu to a low of $3.08 per MMBtu.

30

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

As of December 31, 2013, we had commodity  price derivative agreements  on approximately
9,526 Bbls/d and 4,500 Bbls/d of oil hedged with average minimum prices of $89.48/Bbl  and $83.33/Bbl
in 2014 and 2015,  respectively.

Drilling for  and producing oil and natural gas are  high-risk activities with many  uncertainties that could
adversely affect our business, financial  condition or results  of operations.

Our future financial condition and results  of  operations will  depend on the success of our
exploitation, exploration, development and production activities. Our oil and  natural gas  exploration
and production activities are subject to  numerous risks beyond our control, including the risk that
drilling  will not result in commercially  viable oil or natural gas production. Our decisions to purchase,
explore, develop or otherwise exploit drilling locations or properties will  depend in part  on the
evaluation of data obtained through geophysical and geological analyses, production data and
engineering studies, the results of which are often inconclusive or  subject to varying  interpretations. For
a discussion of the uncertainty involved in  these processes,  see Our estimated proved reserves are based
on many assumptions that may turn out  to be inaccurate.  Any significant inaccuracies  in  these reserve
estimates or underlying assumptions will materially affect the quantities and present value of our reserves
below. Our cost of drilling, completing and operating wells  is often uncertain before drilling
commences. Overruns in budgeted expenditures are  common  risks  that can make a particular  project
uneconomical. Further, many factors  may curtail, delay or  cancel our scheduled drilling  projects,
including the following:

• shortages of or delays in obtaining equipment and qualified  personnel;

• facility or equipment malfunctions;

• unexpected operational events;

• pressure or irregularities in geological formations;

• adverse weather conditions, such as blizzards and ice storms;

• reductions in oil and natural gas prices;

• delays imposed by or resulting from compliance  with regulatory requirements,  such as  permitting

delays;

• proximity to and capacity of transportation facilities;

• title  problems; and

• limitations in the market for oil and natural gas.

Our estimated proved reserves are based on many  assumptions that may turn  out to be inaccurate. Any
significant inaccuracies in these reserve estimates or underlying assumptions  will materially  affect the
quantities and present value of our reserves.

The process of estimating oil and natural gas  reserves is complex. It requires interpretations of
available technical data and many assumptions, including assumptions relating to current and  future
economic conditions and commodity  prices. Any significant inaccuracies in  these interpretations or
assumptions could materially affect the  estimated  quantities and present value of reserves shown  in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K. See Estimated Proved Reserves under Item 1, Part I of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K for information about our estimated oil and natural gas reserves and the PV-10
(a non-GAAP financial measure) as of  December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.

In order to prepare our estimates, we must project production rates  and the timing of development

expenditures. We must also analyze available geological, geophysical, production and engineering  data.

31

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

The extent, quality and reliability of these data  can vary. The  process also requires economic
assumptions about matters such as oil  and natural gas prices,  drilling and operating expenses, capital
expenditures, taxes and availability of funds. Although  the reserve information  contained herein is
reviewed by independent reserve engineers, estimates  of oil  and natural gas reserves are  inherently
imprecise particularly as they relate to new technologies being employed  such as the  combination of
hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling.

Actual future production, oil and natural gas prices, revenues,  taxes, development  expenditures,

operating expenses and quantities of recoverable oil and  natural gas reserves will vary  from our
estimates. Any significant variance could materially  affect the  estimated  quantities and  present  value of
reserves shown in this Annual Report  on Form 10-K  and  our impairment  charge. In addition, we may
adjust estimates of proved reserves to  reflect  production  history, results of exploration and
development, prevailing oil and natural gas  prices and other factors, many of which  are beyond our
control.

There is a limited amount of production  data from horizontal wells  completed  in the Wattenberg Field. As a
result, reserve estimates associated with horizontal wells in this Field are subject to greater uncertainty  than
estimates associated with reserves attributable to vertical  wells in the  same Field.

Reserve engineers rely in part on the production history of nearby wells in establishing reserve
estimates for a particular well or field.  Horizontal drilling in  the Wattenberg Field  is a relatively recent
development, whereas vertical drilling  has been utilized by producers in this field  for over  40 years. As
a result, the amount of production data from horizontal  wells available  to reserve engineers is relatively
small. Until a greater number of horizontal wells have been completed  in the Wattenberg Field, and a
longer production  history from these  wells has  been established,  there  may be a greater variance in  our
proved reserves on a year over year basis  due  to  the transition from vertical to horizontal reserves in
both the proved developed and proved  undeveloped  categories. We cannot assure you that any such
variance  would not be material and any such variance  could have a  material and adverse impact on our
cash flows and results of operations.

Seasonal  weather conditions and lease stipulations adversely affect our ability to conduct drilling activities in
some of the regions where we operate.

Oil and natural gas operations are adversely  affected by seasonal weather conditions  and lease
stipulations designed to protect various wildlife,  particularly  in the Rocky  Mountain  region in  both
cases. In certain areas on federal lands,  drilling and other oil and  natural gas  activities can  only  be
conducted during limited times of the year. These restrictions  limit our  ability  to  operate  in those  areas
and can potentially intensify competition for drilling  rigs,  oilfield  equipment,  services, supplies and
qualified personnel, which may lead to periodic  shortages.  These constraints and the resulting  shortages
or high costs could delay our operations and materially  increase our operating and capital costs.

The present value of future net revenues from  our  proved reserves will  not  necessarily be  the same  as  the
current market value of our estimated oil and natural gas reserves.

You should not assume that the present value of  future net  revenues  from  our  proved reserves  is

the current market value of our estimated  oil and  natural gas reserves. In accordance with new SEC
requirements for the years ended December  31, 2013, 2012  and 2011,  we  based the estimated
discounted future net revenues from our proved  reserves on the unweighted arithmetic average of the
first-day-of-the-month commodity prices (after adjustment for location and  quality differentials)  for the
preceding 12 months, without giving effect to derivative transactions. Actual  future net revenues from
our  oil and natural gas properties will  be affected by factors such as:

• actual prices we receive for oil and natural gas;

32

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

• actual cost of development and production  expenditures;

• the amount and timing of actual production; and

• changes in governmental regulations or  taxation.

The timing of both our production and our incurrence of expenses in connection with the
development and production of oil and natural gas properties  will affect the  timing and  amount  of
actual future net revenues from proved reserves, and thus their actual present value. In  addition,  the
10% discount factor we use when calculating discounted future net revenues may not be the  most
appropriate discount factor based on interest rates  in effect from time to time and risks associated with
us or the oil and natural gas industry  in  general.

Actual future prices and costs may differ materially from those used in the present value estimates

included in this Annual Report on Form  10-K. If oil and natural gas  prices declined by 10% per Bbl
and Mcf then our PV-10 as of December 31, 2013 would decrease  by approximately 20%  or
$242.6 million. PV-10 is a non-GAAP  financial measure.  Please refer to Estimated Proved Reserves
under Item 1, Part 1 of this Annual Report on Form  10-K for  management’s discussion of this
non-GAAP financial measure.

If oil and natural gas prices decrease, we may be required to  take write-downs of  the carrying values  of  our
oil and natural gas  properties.

We  review our proved oil and natural gas properties for impairment whenever events  and
circumstances indicate that a decline  in  the recoverability of their carrying value may have  occurred.
Based on specific market factors and  circumstances  at the  time  of  prospective impairment reviews, and
the continuing evaluation of development plans, production data, economics and other factors,  we may
be required to write down the carrying value  of our oil and natural gas  properties,  which may result in
a decrease in the amount available under  our revolving credit facility. A write-down  constitutes a
non-cash charge to earnings. We may incur impairment charges  in the future, which could have  a
material adverse effect on our ability  to  borrow under  our revolving credit facility and  our  results of
operations for the periods in which such charges are  taken.

We intend to pursue the further development of  our properties in the Wattenberg Field through horizontal
drilling. Horizontal drilling operations can be more operationally challenging and costly relative to our
historic vertical drilling operations. Our  limited operational history with drilling and completing  horizontal
wells may make us more susceptible to  cost overruns and  lower results.

Horizontal drilling is generally more complex and more expensive on  a  per well basis than vertical

drilling. As a result, there is greater risk associated with a horizontal well drilling program. Risks
associated with a horizontal drilling program include,  but are not  limited  to,

• landing our well bore in the desired drilling  zone;

• staying in the desired drilling zone while drilling horizontally through  the formation;

• running our casing the entire length of the  well bore;

• being  able to run tools and other equipment  consistently through  the horizontal well  bore;

• being  able to fracture stimulate the planned number  of stages;

• preventing downhole communications with other wells;

• successfully cleaning out the well bore  after completion of the  final  fracture stimulation stage;

and

• designing and maintaining efficient forms of artificial lift throughout the life of the  well.

33

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Any of these risks could materially and adversely impact the success of our  horizontal drilling program
and thus our cash flows and results of  operations.

The results of our drilling in new or emerging  formations, such as horizontal drilling in the

Niobrara formation, are more uncertain initially than drilling results in areas  or using technologies that
are more developed and have a longer history of established production. Newer or emerging  formations
and areas have limited or no production history, and consequently we are  less  able to predict  future
drilling  results in these areas.

Ultimately, the success of these drilling and completion  techniques can only be evaluated over time
as more wells are drilled and production profiles  are established over  a sufficiently long time period. If
our  drilling results are less than anticipated or  we are  unable to execute our  drilling program  because
of capital constraints, lease expirations,  access to gathering systems, limited  takeaway capacity,  or
natural gas and oil prices decline, the return on  our investment in these areas  may not be as attractive
as we anticipate. Further, as a result of any of these developments, we could incur material write-downs
of our oil and gas properties and the value  of our undeveloped acreage could  decline in the future.

Our ability to produce natural gas and  oil economically  and in commercial quantities could be impaired  if we
are unable to acquire adequate supplies of  water  for our  drilling operations or are unable to  dispose of or
recycle the water we use at a reasonable  cost  and  in accordance  with applicable environmental rules.

The hydraulic fracture stimulation process on which we depend  to  produce commercial quantities
of oil and natural gas requires the use  and disposal  of significant  quantities of water. Our inability to
secure sufficient amounts of water, or  to  dispose of or recycle the  water used in  our  operations, could
adversely impact our operations. The  imposition of new environmental initiatives and  regulations could
include restrictions on our ability to conduct certain  operations such as hydraulic fracturing  or disposal
of waste, including, but not limited to,  produced water, drilling fluids and other wastes associated  with
the exploration, development or production of natural gas. Compliance with environmental regulations
and permit requirements governing the  withdrawal, storage and use  of surface  water or groundwater
necessary for hydraulic fracturing of  wells may increase our operating  costs and cause delays,
interruptions or termination of our operations, the extent of  which cannot be predicted,  and all of
which  could have an adverse effect on our  operations and  financial condition.

The unavailability or high cost of additional drilling rigs,  equipment, supplies, personnel  and oilfield services
could adversely affect our ability to execute our exploration  and development plans  within  our  budget and on  a
timely basis.

Shortages or the high cost of drilling rigs, equipment,  supplies, personnel  or oilfield services could

delay or adversely affect our development  and  exploration operations or  cause us  to  incur  significant
expenditures that are not provided for  in our capital budget, which could have a  material  adverse  effect
on our business, financial condition or  results of  operations.

Our exploration, development and exploitation projects  require substantial  capital  expenditures.  We may  be
unable to obtain needed capital or financing on satisfactory  terms, which could lead to expiration of our
leases or a decline in our oil and natural gas reserves or anticipated production volumes.

Our exploration and development activities  are capital  intensive. We make and expect to continue
to make substantial capital expenditures in  our  business for the development,  exploitation, production
and acquisition of oil and natural gas  reserves. Our  cash flows  used  in investing  activities, excluding
derivative cash settlements, were $453.9  million and  $304.6 million (including $25.8 million  and
$13.9 million for the acquisition of oil and gas properties and contractual obligations  for land
acquisitions) related to capital and exploration expenditures for the years ended December 31, 2013
and 2012, respectively. The mid-point of our capital expenditure budget for 2014 is approximately

34

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

$600  million,  with  approximately  $545  million  allocated  for  operated  drilling  and  completion  activities.
The actual amount and timing of our  future capital  expenditures may differ materially from our
estimates as a result of, among other things,  commodity prices,  actual drilling results, the availability of
drilling  rigs and other services and equipment, and regulatory, technological and  competitive
developments.

A significant improvement in oil and gas prices could result in an increase in our capital
expenditures. We intend to finance our  future capital expenditures  primarily through cash flows
provided by operating activities and borrowings  under our revolving credit  facility.  Our financing needs
may require us to alter or increase our  capitalization substantially through the issuance of additional
equity securities, debt securities or the  sale of non-strategic assets. The  issuance  of additional debt  or
equity may require that a portion of our cash flows provided by operating activities be used for  the
payment of principal and interest on our debt, thereby  reducing  our ability to use cash flows to fund
working capital, capital expenditures and acquisitions. The  issuance  of additional equity securities could
have a dilutive effect on the value of  our common stock. In addition, upon the issuance of certain debt
securities (other than on a borrowing  base redetermination date), our borrowing base under our
revolving credit facility would be reduced.

Our cash  flows provided by operating activities  and  access to capital are subject to a  number of

variables,  including:

• our proved reserves;

• the level of oil and natural gas we are able to produce from existing  wells;

• the prices at which our oil and natural  gas are sold;

• the costs of developing and producing  our oil and natural gas production;

• our ability to acquire, locate and produce new reserves;

• the ability and willingness of our banks to lend; and

• our ability to access the equity and debt capital markets.

If the borrowing base under our revolving credit  facility or our  revenues decrease as a  result of lower
oil or natural gas prices, operating difficulties, declines  in reserves  or for any other reason,  we may
have limited ability to obtain the capital  necessary to sustain our operations at current levels. If
additional capital is needed, we may not  be  able  to  obtain  debt  or  equity financing on  terms favorable
to us, or at all. If cash generated by  operations or cash available under our revolving credit facility is
not sufficient to meet our capital requirements, the  failure to obtain additional financing could result  in
a curtailment of our operations relating to development  of our  drilling locations, which in turn could
lead to a possible expiration of our leases and a decline in  our oil and  natural  gas reserves, and  could
adversely affect our business, financial  condition  and  results of operations.

Increased costs of capital could adversely affect our business.

Recent and continuing disruptions and  volatility in the global financial  markets may lead to an
increase in interest rates or a contraction in credit availability, impacting  our ability  to  finance our
operations. Our business and operating  results can be harmed by factors such as  the terms and cost of
capital, increases in interest rates or  a reduction in credit rating.  Changes in any one or  more of these
factors could cause our cost of doing business  to  increase, limit our access to capital, limit our ability to
pursue acquisition opportunities, reduce  our cash  flows  available for drilling and  place us at a
competitive  disadvantage.

35

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

We may  experience difficulty in achieving and managing future growth.

We  have experienced growth in the past primarily through  the expansion  of  our  drilling program

and acquisitions. Future growth may  place  strains on our  financial,  technical,  operational and
administrative resources and cause us  to rely more on project  partners and independent  contractors,
possibly negatively affecting our financial position and results of operations. Our  ability  to  grow
depends on a number of factors, including:

• our ability to obtain leases or options on properties, including those for which we  have

3-D seismic data;

• our ability to identify and acquire new exploratory prospects;

• our ability to develop existing prospects;

• our ability to continue to retain and attract skilled personnel;

• our ability to maintain or enter into  new  relationships with project partners and  independent

contractors;

• the results of our drilling program;

• oil and natural gas prices; and

• our access to capital.

Our inability to achieve or manage growth may adversely  affect our financial position and results of
operations.

Our ability to pursue our growth strategy may be hindered if we are not able to attract, develop

and retain executives and other qualified  employees. As a  result, we are required to continue  to  invest
in operational, financial and management information systems to attract,  retain, motivate and
effectively manage our employees.

Concentration of our operations in a few  core areas  may  increase our risk  of production loss.

Our assets and operations are concentrated in  two core  areas: the Wattenberg Field  in Colorado

and the Dorcheat Macedonia Field in  southern Arkansas. These core areas currently provide
approximately 97% of our current production and the  vast  majority of our development  projects.
Beginning in 2012, we initiated a non-core  divestiture program to focus our portfolio through the sale
of certain non-core assets in California,  with one property remaining to be sold as  of  December 31,
2013. As a result of these portfolio changes, our operations and production are  more concentrated.

The Wattenberg and Dorcheat Macedonia Fields represent 65% and 32%, respectively,  of  our 2013

total sales volumes. Disruption of our  business  in either of  these  Fields,  such as  from an accident,
natural disaster or other event, would  result  in a greater impact on our  production  profile, cash flows
and overall business plan than if we  operated  in a larger number of  areas.

We  do not maintain business interruption  (loss of production) insurance for our oil and gas
producing properties. Loss of production or limited access to reserves in either  of  our  core  operating
areas could have a significant negative  impact on our cash flows and profitability.

36

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

We are dependent on third party pipeline,  trucking  and rail systems  to transport our  production and,  in  the
Wattenberg Field, gathering and processing systems to prepare our production. These systems have limited
capacity and at times have experienced  service disruptions. Curtailments, disruptions or lack of availability in
these  systems interfere with our ability  to  market the oil  and natural gas we produce, and could materially
and adversely affect our cash flow and results of operations.

Market conditions or the unavailability of satisfactory  oil and natural  gas transportation
arrangements may hinder our access  to  oil  and natural gas markets  or delay  our production. The
marketability of our oil and natural gas and production, particularly from our wells located in the
Wattenberg Field,  depends in part on the  availability, proximity and  capacity of gathering, processing,
pipeline, trucking and rail systems. The  amount of oil  and natural  gas that can be produced  and sold is
subject to limitation in certain circumstances, such as pipeline  interruptions due to scheduled and
unscheduled maintenance, excessive  pressure, physical  damage to the gathering or  transportation
system, or lack of  contracted capacity  on such  systems. A  portion of our production may also  be
interrupted, or shut in, from time to time  for numerous other reasons,  including as  a result of
accidents, excessive pressures, maintenance, weather, field  labor issues  or disruptions in service.
Curtailments and disruptions in these systems may last from a  few days to several months. We  may be
required to shut in wells due to lack of a market or  inadequacy  or  unavailability of crude oil or  natural
gas pipelines or gathering system capacity. These  risks are greater for us than for  some of our
competitors because our operations are  focused on  areas where there is currently a substantial amount
of development activity, which increases the likelihood that  there  will be periods  of time  in which there
is insufficient midstream capacity to accommodate the resulting  increases in  production. For  example,
the gas gathering systems serving the  Wattenberg Field recently experienced  high line  pressures
reducing capacity and causing gas production to either be shut in or flared. In addition, we  might
voluntarily curtail production in response to market conditions.  Any  significant curtailment in gathering,
processing or pipeline system capacity,  significant delay  in the construction of necessary facilities or lack
of availability of transport, would interfere with our  ability to  market  the oil  and natural gas we
produce, and could materially and adversely  affect our cash flow and results of operations, and the
expected results of our drilling program.

Currently, there are no natural gas pipeline  systems that service wells  in the North Park Basin,

which  is prospective for the Niobrara  formation. In addition, we  are  not aware of  any plans to
construct a facility necessary to process  natural gas produced from this basin. If  neither we  nor a third
party constructs the required pipeline  system and  processing  facility, we may not be able to fully
develop our resources in the North Park Basin.

The development of our proved undeveloped  reserves may take longer and  may  require higher  levels of capital
expenditures than we currently anticipate.  Therefore,  our  undeveloped reserves may not be ultimately  developed
or produced.

Approximately 54% of our total proved  reserves were classified as  proved undeveloped as of
December 31, 2013. Development of these reserves may take longer and require higher  levels of capital
expenditures than we currently anticipate. Delays in the development of our reserves or  increases in
costs to drill and develop such reserves  will  reduce the value of  our estimated proved  undeveloped
reserves and future net revenues estimated for such reserves  and may result in some projects becoming
uneconomic. In addition, delays in the  development of  reserves could  cause us to have  to  reclassify our
proved reserves as unproved reserves.

Unless we replace our oil and natural gas  reserves, our reserves  and  production will  decline, which would
adversely affect our business, financial  condition and  results of operations.

In general, production from oil and gas properties  declines as reserves are depleted, with  the rate
of decline depending on reservoir characteristics. Our current proved  reserves will decline as reserves

37

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

are produced and, therefore, our level  of production and cash  flows will  be  affected adversely unless we
conduct successful exploration and development activities or  acquire properties containing  proved
reserves. Thus, our future oil and natural  gas production and, therefore, our cash flow  and income are
highly dependent upon our level of success in finding or acquiring additional reserves.  However, we
cannot assure you that our future acquisition,  development and exploration  activities will result in any
specific  amount of additional proved reserves or  that  we will  be  able to drill productive wells  at
acceptable  costs.

According to estimates included in our December 31,  2013  proved reserve report, if, on  January 1,
2014, we had ceased all drilling and development, including  recompletions, refracs and  workovers, then
our  proved developed producing reserves base would decline at an annual effective rate of 53% during
the first year. If we fail to replace reserves through  drilling, our  level  of production  and cash flows will
be affected adversely.

We may  incur substantial losses and be subject to  substantial liability claims  as a result  of  our oil and natural
gas operations. Additionally, we may not be  insured for,  or our insurance  may  be inadequate to protect  us
against, these risks, including those related to  our  hydraulic  fracturing operations.

Our oil and natural gas exploration and production activities are subject to  all  of the operating

risks associated with drilling for and producing  oil and natural gas, including the possibility of:

• environmental hazards, such as spills, uncontrollable flows of oil,  natural gas, brine, well fluids,

natural gas, hazardous air pollutants or other pollution into the  environment, including
groundwater and shoreline contamination;

• releases of natural gas and hazardous air pollutants or  other substances into the  atmosphere

(including releases at our gas processing facilities);

• hazards resulting from the presence of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) or other contaminants in natural

gas we produce;

• abnormally pressured formations resulting in well blowouts, fires or explosions;

• mechanical difficulties, such as stuck  oilfield drilling  and service  tools and  casing collapse;

• cratering (catastrophic failure);

• downhole communication leading to migration of contaminants;

• personal injuries and death; and

• natural disasters.

Any of these risks could adversely affect  our ability  to  conduct  operations or  result in substantial

losses to us as a result of:

• injury or loss of life;

• damage to and destruction of property,  natural resources and equipment;

• pollution and other environmental damage;

• regulatory investigations and penalties;

• suspension of our operations; and

• repair and remediation costs.

38

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

At two of our Arkansas properties, we produce a small amount of  gas from seven operated  wells

where  we have identified the presence of H2S at levels that would be hazardous in  the event of  an
uncontrolled gas release or unprotected exposure. In addition,  our operations  in Arkansas  and
Colorado are susceptible to damage  from natural disasters such  as flooding,  wildfires or tornados,
which  involve increased risks of personal injury,  property damage  and  marketing interruptions.  The
occurrence of one of these operating hazards  may  result in  injury, loss of life,  suspension of operations,
environmental damage and remediation  and/or  governmental investigations and  penalties. The payment
of any of these liabilities could reduce,  or  even eliminate,  the funds available for exploration  and
development, or could result in a loss  of our properties.

As is customary in the gas and oil industry,  we maintain  insurance against some,  but not all, of
these potential risks and losses. Although we believe the  coverage and amounts  of insurance that we
carry are consistent with industry practice, we  do  not  have insurance  protection against all risks  that we
face, because we choose not to insure certain risks, insurance  is not available at a level  that  balances
the costs of insurance and our desired  rates of return, or  actual losses exceed coverage limits.  Insurance
costs are expected to continue to increase  over the next  few years, and we may  decrease coverage and
retain more risk to mitigate future cost increases. In addition, pollution and environmental risks
generally are not fully insurable. If we  incur substantial liability, and  the damages are not covered by
insurance or are in excess of policy limits,  then our business,  results of operations and financial
condition may be materially adversely  affected.

Because hydraulic fracturing activities are part of our operations, they are covered by our

insurance against claims made for bodily injury, property damage and clean-up  costs stemming  from a
sudden and accidental pollution event. We may not  have coverage if the operator is unaware of the
pollution event and unable to report  the ‘‘occurrence’’  to  the insurance company within the  required
time frame. Nor do we have coverage  for gradual, long-term  pollution  events.

Under certain circumstances, we have agreed to indemnify third parties against losses resulting

from our operations. Pursuant to our surface leases,  we typically  indemnify the  surface  owner for
clean-up and remediation of the site. As owner and operator of oil and gas wells and associated
gathering systems and pipelines, we typically indemnify  the drilling contractor  for pollution  emanating
from the well, while the contractor indemnifies us against pollution emanating from  its  equipment.

Drilling locations that we decide to drill  may not yield oil or natural gas in  commercially viable  quantities.

We  describe some of our drilling locations  and  our plans to explore  those drilling  locations in  this
Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our drilling locations are  in various stages of evaluation, ranging from a
location that is ready to drill to a location that will require substantial additional evaluation. There is
no way  to predict in advance of drilling  and testing  whether  any particular location will yield oil or
natural gas in sufficient quantities to recover  drilling or completion costs or to be economically viable.
The use of  technologies and the study  of producing fields in the  same  area will not enable us to know
conclusively prior to drilling whether oil or  natural  gas will be present or, if present, whether oil  or
natural gas will be present in sufficient  quantities  to  be  economically viable. Even if sufficient amounts
of oil or natural gas exist, we may damage the potentially  productive hydrocarbon  bearing formation or
experience mechanical difficulties while  drilling or completing the well, resulting in  a reduction  in
production from the well or abandonment of  the well. If  we  drill additional wells  that  we identify as dry
holes in our current and future drilling locations, our drilling success rate may  decline  and materially
harm our business. We cannot assure you that  the analogies we draw from available data from other
wells, more fully explored locations or  producing fields will be applicable to our drilling locations.
Further, initial production rates reported by us or other operators may  not be indicative of future  or
long-term production rates. In sum, the cost of drilling, completing and operating any well is often
uncertain, and new wells may not be  productive.

39

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Our potential drilling location inventories are  scheduled to be developed over several years,  making them
susceptible to uncertainties that could materially alter  the occurrence or  timing of their  drilling. In addition,
we may not be able to raise the substantial  amount  of capital that would be  necessary to drill a substantial
portion of our potential drilling locations.

Our management has identified and scheduled  drilling locations  as an estimation of  our future
multi-year drilling activities on our existing  acreage. As of December 31, 2013, a significant portion of
our  drilling program targets probable  and possible  reserves with only 305  gross (255 net)  of our
approximately 1,950 identified potential  future gross drilling  locations attributed to proved undeveloped
reserves. These potential drilling locations, including those without proved  undeveloped reserves,
represent a significant part of our growth strategy. Our ability to drill and develop these locations is
subject to a number of uncertainties,  including uncertainty in the level of reserves, the availability  of
capital to us and other participants, seasonal conditions, regulatory approvals,  oil and natural gas
prices, availability of permits, costs and  drilling results. Because of these uncertainties, we do  not  know
if the numerous potential drilling locations we have identified  will ever be drilled or  if  we will be able
to produce oil or natural gas from these  or any other potential drilling locations. Pursuant to existing
SEC rules and guidance, subject to limited exceptions,  proved undeveloped reserves may only be
booked if they relate to wells scheduled to be drilled within  five  years  of  the date  of booking. These
rules and guidance may limit our potential to book additional proved  undeveloped  reserves as we
pursue our drilling program.

Certain of our undeveloped leasehold acreage is subject to leases that will expire  over the next several years
unless production is established on units  containing the acreage.

The terms of our oil and gas leases stipulate that the lease  will terminate if  not  held by

production, rentals, or operations. As  of December 31,  2013, the majority  of our  acreage in Arkansas
was held by unitization, production, or drilling operations and therefore not subject  to  lease expiration.
As of December 31, 2013, 16,057 net  acres  of  our properties in the  Rocky Mountain  region, specifically
7,062 acres in the Wattenberg Field and  8,995 acres in the North Park Basin, were not held by
production. For these properties, if production  in paying quantities  is not established on units
containing  these  leases  during  the  next  year,  then  574  net  acres  will  expire  in  2014,  2,674  net  acres  will
expire in 2015, and 1,233 net acres will expire in 2016.  If our leases  expire, we  will lose  our right to
develop the related properties.

We may  incur losses as a result of title deficiencies.

The existence of a title deficiency can diminish the  value of an acquired leasehold  interest  and can

adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. Title insurance  covering mineral
leasehold interests is not generally available. In certain situations we may rely upon a land
professional’s careful examination of  public  records prior to  purchasing or leasing a mineral interest.
Once a specific mineral or leasehold interest has been  acquired,  we typically defer the  expense of
obtaining further title verification by  a practicing title attorney  until the drilling  block needs approval to
drill. We do not always perform curative work to correct deficiencies  in the marketability  of the title;
however, we currently have compliance and control measures to ensure any  associated business risk  is
approved by the appropriate company  authority. In  cases involving  more serious  title deficiencies, all or
part of a mineral or leasehold interest  may be determined to be invalid or unleased, and, as a  result,
the target area may be deemed to be undrillable until  owners can be contacted and curative performed
to perfect title. Certain title deficiencies  may  also result  in litigation from  time to time. Additional title
issues are present in our Southern Arkansas operations. Significant delays in the  title examination
process are possible due to, among other challenges,  the large volume of instruments  contained in
abstracts, poor indexing at the county clerk and recorder’s office, the  misfiling of instruments,
instruments with missing or inadequate legal descriptions and unclear conveyance terms.

40

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

We face various risks associated with the  trend toward increased activism against oil  and gas  exploration and
development  activities.

Opposition toward oil and gas drilling  and  development activity has  been growing globally and is

particularly pronounced in the United  States.  Companies in  the oil and gas industry  are often the
target of activist efforts from both individuals  and non-governmental  organizations regarding safety,
environmental compliance and business practices. Anti-development activists are  working to, among
other things, reduce access to federal and state government lands and delay or cancel certain projects
such as the development of oil or gas  shale plays. For example, environmental  activists continue to
advocate for increased regulations or bans on shale drilling in the United  States, even  in jurisdictions
that are among the most stringent in their regulation  of  the industry. Future activist efforts could result
in the following:

• delay or denial of drilling permits;

• shortening of lease terms or reduction in lease  size;

• restrictions on installation or operation of production, gathering or processing  facilities;

• restrictions on the use of certain operating practices, such as hydraulic fracturing, or  the disposal

of related waste materials, such as hydraulic fracturing fluids  and produced water;

• increased severance and/or other taxes;

• cyber-attacks;

• legal challenges or lawsuits;

• negative publicity about us;

• increased costs of doing business;

• reduction in demand for our products;  and

• other adverse effects on our ability to develop our properties and  expand  production.

We  may need to incur significant costs  associated with responding to these initiatives. Complying
with any resulting additional legal or regulatory requirements  that are substantial  and not adequately
provided for could have a material adverse effect on our  business,  financial  condition and  results of
operations.

Our operations are subject to health, safety and environmental laws and regulations  that may expose us to
significant costs and liabilities.

Our oil and natural gas exploration,  production and processing operations are subject to stringent

and complex federal, state and local  laws and regulations governing  health  and safety  aspects of our
operations, the discharge of materials  into  the environment  and  the  protection of the  environment.
These laws and regulations may impose  on our  operations numerous requirements, including  the
obligation to obtain a permit before conducting drilling or underground  injection activities; restrictions
on the types, quantities and concentration of materials that  may be released into the environment;
limitations or prohibitions of drilling  activities on certain lands lying within wilderness, wetlands and
other protected areas; specific health and safety criteria to protect workers;  and the  responsibility for
cleaning up any pollution resulting from operations.  Numerous governmental authorities, such as the
EPA and analogous state agencies, have the power to enforce compliance with  these laws and
regulations and the permits issued under them, oftentimes requiring difficult and costly actions. Failure
to comply with these laws and regulations  may result in the assessment of  administrative, civil and
criminal penalties; the imposition of  investigatory or  remedial obligations; the issuance of injunctions

41

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

limiting or preventing some or all of our  operations; delays  in granting permits, or  even the
cancellation of leases.

There is  an inherent risk of incurring significant environmental  costs  and  liabilities  in the
performance of our operations, some  of which may be material, due to our handling  of petroleum
hydrocarbons and  wastes, our emissions  to air and  water, the  underground injection or other  disposal
of our wastes, the use and disposition  of hydraulic fracturing  fluids, and historical industry operations
and waste disposal practices. Under certain environmental  laws and regulations, we may be liable
regardless of whether we were at fault  for the full  cost of removing or remediating  contamination, even
when multiple parties contributed to  the  release and  the contaminants were released in compliance
with all  applicable laws. In addition,  accidental spills  or releases  on our properties may  expose us to
significant liabilities that could have a  material adverse effect on our financial condition or  results of
operations. Aside from government agencies, the owners of properties  where our wells are located, the
operators of facilities where our petroleum hydrocarbons or wastes  are taken for  reclamation or
disposal and other private parties may be able to sue us to  enforce compliance  with environmental  laws
and regulations, collect penalties for violations or obtain damages for any related personal injury or
property damage. Some sites we operate  are located near current or former third-party  oil and natural
gas operations or facilities, and there  is  a risk that historic contamination has migrated from those sites
to ours.  Changes in environmental laws and regulations occur frequently, and any changes that result  in
more stringent or costly material handling, emission, waste management  or cleanup requirements  could
require us to make significant expenditures to attain and maintain compliance or may otherwise have a
material adverse effect on our own results of operations,  competitive position  or financial condition.
We  may not be able to recover some  or  any  of these  costs from  insurance.

New environmental legislation or regulatory initiatives, including  those related to hydraulic fracturing, could
result in increased costs and additional operating restrictions or  delays.

We  are subject to extensive federal, state, and local laws and regulations concerning health, safety,
and environmental protection. Government authorities  frequently add to those requirements, and both
oil and gas development generally and  hydraulic fracturing specifically are receiving increasing
regulatory attention. Our operations utilize  hydraulic fracturing, an important and commonly  used
process in the completion of oil and  natural gas  wells in  low-permeability formations. Hydraulic
fracturing involves the injection of water,  proppant,  and chemicals  under pressure into rock formations
to stimulate hydrocarbon production.

Recently, the EPA issued final rules that  establish new  air emission controls for natural gas
processing operations, as well as for oil and  natural gas production. Among other things, the latter
rules cover the completion and operation of  hydraulically fractured gas  wells and  associated equipment.
After several parties challenged the new air regulations in court, the EPA  reconsidered certain
requirements and is evaluating whether  reconsideration of other  issues  is warranted.  At this point, we
cannot predict the final regulatory requirements or the cost to comply with such air regulatory
requirements.

Some activists have attempted to link hydraulic  fracturing to various environmental problems,
including potential adverse effects to drinking water supplies as well as migration of  methane  and other
hydrocarbons. As a result, the federal government  is studying the  environmental risks associated with
hydraulic fracturing and evaluating whether to adopt additional regulatory requirements. For example,
the EPA has commenced a multi-year  study of the potential impacts of hydraulic  fracturing on  drinking
water resources, and the draft results  are  expected to be released for public and  peer review in 2014 .
In addition, on October 21, 2011, the EPA announced its intention to propose regulations by 2014
under the federal Clean Water Act to regulate wastewater  discharges from hydraulic fracturing  and
other natural gas production. The EPA  also  has prepared draft guidance  for issuing  underground
injection permits that would regulate  hydraulic fracturing using diesel fuel, where  EPA has permitting

42

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

authority under the Safe Drinking Water Act (‘‘SDWA’’); this guidance eventually could encourage
other regulatory authorities to adopt  to  permitting and other  restrictions on the  use of hydraulic
fracturing. The U.S. Department of Interior,  moreover, has proposed new rules  for hydraulic fracturing
activities on federal lands that, in general, would cover disclosure of  fracturing fluid components, well
bore integrity, and handling of flowback water. And the U.S. Occupational Safety and  Health
Administration has proposed stricter standards  for worker exposure to silica,  which would  apply to use
of sand as a proppant for hydraulic fracturing.

In the United States Congress, bills have  been introduced that  would amend the  SDWA to
eliminate an existing exemption for certain hydraulic  fracturing activities from the definition of
‘‘underground injection,’’ thereby requiring the oil  and  natural  gas industry to obtain SDWA permits
for fracturing not involving diesel fuels,  and to require  disclosure of the chemicals used  in the process.
If adopted, such legislation could establish an additional level  of  regulation  and permitting  at the
federal level, but some form of chemical  disclosure is already required  by most oil and gas  producing
states. At this time, it is not clear what  action, if any,  the United States  Congress will take on hydraulic
fracturing.

Apart from these ongoing federal initiatives, state governments where we operate have moved to

impose stricter requirements on hydraulic fracturing and other aspects of oil and  gas production.
Colorado, for example, comprehensively updated its oil  and gas  regulations  in 2008 and adopted
significant additional amendments in  2011 and  2013. Among other things, the  updated and  amended
regulations require operators to reduce  methane emissions associated with  hydraulic fracturing, compile
and report additional information regarding well bore integrity, publicly disclose the  chemical
ingredients used in hydraulic fracturing, increase  the minimum distance  between  occupied structures
and oil and gas wells, undertake additional mitigation for nearby residents, and implement additional
groundwater testing. The State is also  considering new regulations  for air emissions from oil and  gas
operations as well as potential legislation increasing the monetary  penalties  for regulatory violations.

Even local governments are adopting new requirements on hydraulic fracturing and other oil and

gas operations. Some counties in Colorado, for  instance, have  amended their land  use regulations to
impose new requirements on oil and gas  development, while other local governments have entered
memoranda of agreement with oil and  gas producers to accomplish the same  objective. Beyond that, in
2012, Longmont, Colorado prohibited the use of hydraulic fracturing.  The  oil and gas industry and the
State are challenging that ban—and the  authority of local jurisdictions to regulate oil  and gas
development—in court. In November  2013, four other Colorado  cities  and counties passed voter
initiatives either placing a moratorium  on hydraulic fracturing or banning  new oil  and gas development.
These initiatives too are the subject of pending legal  challenge. While these initiatives cover areas with
little recent or ongoing oil and gas development, they  could  lead opponents  of  hydraulic fracturing to
push for statewide referendums, especially in  Colorado.

The adoption of future federal, state or  local laws or implementing  regulations imposing new

environmental obligations on, or otherwise limiting, our operations could make it  more difficult and
more expensive to  complete oil and natural gas  wells, increase our  costs of compliance and  doing
business, delay or prevent the development of  certain resources (including especially shale  formations
that are not commercial without the  use of hydraulic fracturing),  or  alter the  demand for  and
consumption of our products and services.  We  cannot assure you that any such outcome  would not be
material, and any such outcome could have a material  and adverse  impact  on our cash flows  and
results of operations.

43

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Climate change laws and regulations restricting emissions of ‘‘greenhouse  gases’’ could  result in increased
operating costs and reduced demand for the oil  and natural gas that we produce,  while the physical effects of
climate change could disrupt our production and  cause us  to incur significant costs in preparing for or
responding to those  effects.

There is  a growing belief that human-caused (anthropogenic) emissions of greenhouse gases
(‘‘GHG’’) may be linked to climate change. Climate change and the costs that may be associated  with
its  impacts and the regulation of GHG  have  the potential to affect  our business  in many ways,
including negatively impacting the costs  we incur  in providing  our products and services and the
demand for and consumption of our  products and services (due to potential changes in both costs  and
weather  patterns).

In December 2009, the EPA determined that atmospheric  concentrations  of carbon dioxide,
methane and certain other GHG present  an endangerment to public health  and welfare, because such
gases are, according to the EPA, contributing to the warming  of the Earth’s  atmosphere and other
climatic changes. Consistent with its findings, the  EPA  has proposed  or  adopted  various regulations
under the Clean Air Act to address GHG.  Among other things, the EPA began limiting emissions of
GHG from new cars and light duty trucks  beginning  with the  2012 model year.  In  addition, the  EPA
has published a final rule to address  the permitting  of  GHG  emissions  from stationary sources under
the Prevention of Significant Deterioration, or ‘‘PSD,’’ and Title V  permitting programs, pursuant to
which  these permitting requirements  have been ‘‘tailored’’  to  apply  to  certain ‘‘major’’  stationary
sources  of GHG emissions in a multi-step process,  with the  largest  major sources first subject to
permitting. Facilities required to obtain PSD permits for their GHG emissions  will  be  required to meet
emissions limits that are based on the  ‘‘best available control technology,’’ which  will be established by
the permitting agencies on a case-by-case basis. The EPA also adopted regulations  requiring the
reporting of GHG emissions from specific categories of higher  GHG  emitting sources in the United
States, including certain oil and natural  gas production facilities, which  include certain of our
operations, beginning in 2012 for emissions occurring  in 2011. Information  in such  report may form the
basis for further GHG regulation. Further,  the EPA is evaluating strategies for  reducing  air  emissions
of methane from oil and gas operations. The EPA’s GHG  rules could adversely affect  our  operations
and restrict or delay our ability to obtain air permits for  new  or  modified  facilities.

Moreover, Congress has from time to  time considered adopting  legislation to reduce emissions of

GHG or promote  the use of renewable fuels. As an alternative, some proponents  of  GHG controls
have advocated mandating a national  ‘‘clean energy’’ standard.  In 2011, for  example, President Obama
encouraged Congress to adopt a goal of  generating 80% of U.S. electricity from ‘‘clean energy’’ by 2035
with credit for renewable and nuclear power and partial credit  for clean coal and ‘‘efficient natural
gas.’’ Because of the lack of any comprehensive  federal  legislative program expressly  addressing GHG,
there currently is a great deal of uncertainty as to how  and when additional  federal regulation of GHG
might take place and as to whether the EPA should continue with its existing regulations  in the absence
of more specific Congressional direction.

In the meantime, many states already  have taken such measures, which have included renewable
energy standards, development of GHG  emission inventories or cap and trade programs. Cap and trade
programs typically work by requiring major sources  of emissions or major  producers of fuels to acquire
and surrender emission allowances, with the  number of  available allowances  reduced  each year  until the
overall GHG emission reduction goal  is  achieved. These allowances would  be  expected to escalate
significantly in cost over time.

The adoption of legislation or regulatory programs to reduce emissions of GHG could require  us
to incur increased operating costs, such as  costs to purchase and operate emissions control systems, to
acquire emissions allowances or comply with new  regulatory or reporting requirements. If we are
unable to recover or pass through a significant  level of our  costs  related  to  complying with climate

44

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

change regulatory requirements imposed  on us,  it could have  a  material adverse effect on our  results of
operations and financial condition. Any  such legislation or regulatory programs could also  increase the
cost of consuming, and thereby reduce demand for, the oil  and natural  gas we produce. Consequently,
legislation and regulatory programs to  reduce  emissions  of  GHG could have  an adverse effect on  our
business, financial condition and results  of operations.

Finally, it should be noted that some scientists  have concluded that increasing concentrations of
GHG in the Earth’s atmosphere may produce climate changes  that have significant  physical effects,
such as increased frequency and severity of storms and floods.  If any  such effects  were to occur, they
could have an adverse effect on our  exploration and production  operations.  Significant  physical effects
of climate change could also have an  indirect effect on  our financing and operations  by  disrupting the
transportation or process-related services  provided by midstream  companies, service companies  or
suppliers with whom we have a business relationship. Our  insurance may  not  cover some or any of the
damages, losses, or costs that may result from potential  physical effects  of  climate  change.

Competition in the oil and natural gas industry is intense, making it more difficult  for us to acquire
properties, market oil and natural gas and secure trained personnel.

Our ability to acquire additional drilling  locations and to find  and develop reserves in the  future

will depend on our ability to evaluate  and select suitable properties and  to consummate transactions in
a highly competitive environment for  acquiring  properties, marketing oil  and natural gas and securing
equipment and trained personnel. Also, there  is substantial competition for capital available for
investment in the oil and natural gas  industry. Many of our competitors possess and employ financial,
technical and personnel resources substantially greater than ours. Those companies may be able to pay
more for productive oil and natural gas properties and exploratory drilling locations  or to identify,
evaluate, bid for and purchase a greater number of properties and locations than our financial or
personnel resources permit. Furthermore,  these companies may also  be  better  able to withstand  the
financial pressures of unsuccessful drilling attempts, sustained periods of  volatility  in financial markets
and generally adverse global and industry-wide economic  conditions, and may be better able  to  absorb
the burdens resulting from changes in relevant laws and regulations, which would  adversely affect  our
competitive position. In addition, companies may be able to offer better  compensation packages to
attract and retain qualified personnel than we are able to offer.  The  cost to attract and retain qualified
personnel has increased over the past  few  years  due  to  competition and  may increase substantially  in
the future. We may not be able to compete successfully in  the future  in acquiring prospective reserves,
developing  reserves, marketing hydrocarbons, attracting  and retaining quality personnel and  raising
additional capital, which could have a  material adverse effect on our business.

If we fail to retain our existing senior management or technical personnel or  attract qualified  new personnel,
such  failure could adversely affect our operations.

To a large extent, we depend on the services of  our senior  management and  technical personnel.
The loss of the services of our senior management, technical personnel, or  any of the  vice presidents of
the Company, could have a material adverse effect on our operations. We do not maintain, nor  do we
plan  to obtain, any insurance against the  loss of  any of these individuals.

Effective January 31, 2014, Michael R. Starzer,  retired from his position as President  and Chief

Executive Officer and Marvin M. Chronister, a  current Board member, is  serving  as Interim President
and Chief Executive Officer until a permanent  replacement  is identified. We are in  the process of
completing a comprehensive search for  a  permanent Chief Executive Officer, however there can be no
assurance that we will be able to identify and hire  a qualified candidate in a timely  manner. Our ability
to attract, select and hire a permanent  Chief Executive  Officer candidate may prove difficult, take more
time than anticipated, and be costly. This may require other  senior management to divert part of their
attention from their primary duties, which could have  an adverse effect on our business or operations.

45

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Similarly, our business could be adversely  affected if we are unable to attract and retain qualified
senior management, including a permanent Chief Executive Officer.

We recorded substantial stock-based compensation expense  in  2013,  and we are likely  to incur  additional
stock-based compensation expense related to our future grants of  stock, which may  impact our operating
results for the foreseeable future.

We  incurred stock-based compensation  expense in  2013 in the  amount  of $12.6 million compared
to $4.5 million in 2012. Our compensation  expenses are  likely to increase in the future as compared to
our  historical expenses because of the  costs  associated with  our stock-based  incentive plans. These
additional expenses will adversely affect  our  net income. We  cannot determine the actual  amount  of
these new stock-related compensation and benefit expenses at  this time, because applicable accounting
practices generally require that they be based on the fair market  value of the options or shares of
common stock at the date of the grant;  however,  we expect them  to  be  significant. We will recognize
expenses for restricted stock and stock option awards  we grant  generally over the vesting period of such
awards.

Our derivative activities could result in financial  losses or  could reduce  our income.

To achieve more predictable cash flows  and  to  reduce our exposure to adverse  fluctuations in the

prices of oil and natural gas, we currently, and may in  the future,  enter into derivative arrangements
for a portion of our oil and natural gas production,  including collars  and  fixed-price swaps. We  have
not designated any of our derivative  instruments  as hedges for accounting purposes and  record all
derivative instruments on our balance sheet  at fair value. Changes in  the fair value of our derivative
instruments are recognized in earnings.  Accordingly, our earnings  may fluctuate  significantly  as a result
of changes in the fair value of our derivative instruments.

Derivative arrangements also expose us  to  the risk  of financial loss in some circumstances,

including  when:

• production is less than the volume  covered by the derivative  instruments;

• the counterparty to the derivative instrument  defaults on its  contract  obligations; or

• there is an increase in the differential between the underlying price  in the derivative instrument

and actual prices received.

In addition, these types of derivative  arrangements limit the  benefit we  would receive from
increases in the prices for oil and natural gas  and  may  expose us to cash margin requirements.

Current  or proposed financial legislation and rulemaking could have an adverse effect on our ability to use
derivative instruments to reduce the effect  of commodity  price, interest  rate and other risks associated with our
business.

The Dodd-Frank Act, which was signed into law on July  21,  2010, establishes, among other

provisions, federal oversight and regulation  of  the over-the-counter derivatives  market and entities that
participate in that  market. The Dodd-Frank Act also establishes  margin requirements and certain
transaction clearing and trade execution requirements. On October 18, 2011,  the Commodities  Futures
Trading Commission (the ‘‘CFTC’’) approved regulations  to set position  limits for  certain  futures and
option contracts in the major energy  markets, which were  successfully challenged in federal  district
court by the Securities Industry Financial  Markets Association and the International Swaps and
Derivatives Association and largely vacated by the court. The CFTC has filed a notice of appeal with
respect to this ruling. Under CFTC final  rules promulgated under the  Dodd-Frank Act, we  believe our
derivatives activity will qualify for the non-financial, commercial  end-user exception, which exempts
derivatives intended to hedge or mitigate  commercial risk from the mandatory swap  clearing

46

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

requirement. The Dodd-Frank Act may also require us to comply  with margin requirements in our
derivative activities, although the application of those provisions  to  us is  uncertain  at this time. The
financial reform legislation may also require  the counterparties to our derivative  instruments to spin off
some of their derivatives activities to  separate entities, which  may  not be as creditworthy  as the current
counterparties.

The Dodd-Frank Act and any new regulations could significantly  increase the  cost of derivative
contracts (including through requirements to post collateral, which could adversely affect our available
liquidity), materially alter the terms of derivative contracts, reduce the availability of  derivatives to
protect against risks we encounter, reduce  our  ability to monetize  or restructure our  existing derivative
contracts and increase our exposure  to  less creditworthy counterparties. If we  reduce our use  of
derivative as a result of the Dodd-Frank Act and  regulations, our results of operations may be more
volatile and our cash flows may be less predictable, which could adversely affect our ability to plan for
and fund capital expenditures. Finally, the Dodd-Frank Act was intended, in part, to reduce the
volatility of oil and gas prices, which  some legislators attributed to speculative trading in  derivatives and
commodity instruments related to oil and  gas. Our revenues could  therefore be adversely affected if a
consequence of the Dodd-Frank Act and regulations is to lower commodity prices. Any of these
consequences could have a material adverse effect on our  consolidated  financial  position,  results of
operations and cash flows.

Our leverage and debt service obligations may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations,
business prospects and our ability to make payment  on our Senior Notes.

As of December 31, 2013, we had $500  million  of  outstanding 6.75% Senior Notes  (‘‘Senior
Notes’’), no borrowings outstanding under our revolving credit  facility and $181 million  of cash  and
cash equivalents. We intend to fund our capital expenditures through  our  cash flow from operations
and borrowings under our revolving credit facility,  but may seek  additional debt financing. Our level of
indebtedness could affect our operations  in several ways, including the following:

• require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our  cash flow from operations to service our

existing debt, thereby reducing the cash available to finance our operations and  other business
activities;

• limit management’s discretion in operating our business and our flexibility in  planning for or

reacting to changes in our business and the  industry  in which  we operate;

• increase our vulnerability to downturns and  adverse developments in  our business and the

economy  generally;

• limit our ability to access capital markets to raise capital on favorable terms or to obtain

additional financing for working capital,  capital expenditures or acquisitions or to refinance
existing  indebtedness;

• place restrictions on our ability to  obtain additional  financing, make investments, lease

equipment, sells assets and engage in  business combinations;

• make it more likely that a reduction in  our borrowing base following a  periodic redetermination

could require us to repay a portion of our then-outstanding bank borrowings;

• make us more vulnerable to increases in interest  rates as our indebtedness under any revolving

credit facility may vary with prevailing  interest rates;

• place us at a competitive disadvantage relative  to  competitors  with lower levels  of  indebtedness

in relation to their overall size or less restrictive terms governing their indebtedness; and

• make it more difficult for us to satisfy  our obligations under  the Senior Notes or other debt and

increase the risks that we may default on  our  debt obligations.

47

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Our revolving credit facility and the indenture governing the  Senior Notes have  restrictive  covenants that could
limit our growth and our ability to finance our operations, fund  our capital needs, respond to changing
conditions and engage in other business activities that  may  be  in  our best  interests.

Our revolving credit facility and the indenture governing the Senior  Notes contain restrictive
covenants that limit our ability to engage  in activities  that may be in our long-term  best interests.

Our ability to borrow under our revolving credit facility  is subject  to  compliance with  certain
financial covenants, including the maintenance  of certain financial  ratios, including a minimum  current
ratio, a maximum leverage ratio and  a  minimum interest  coverage  ratio.

In addition, our revolving credit facility and the indenture governing the Senior Notes contain
covenants that, among other things, limit our ability  and the  ability  of  our restricted subsidiaries to:

• incur or guarantee additional indebtedness;

• issue preferred stock;

• sell or  transfer assets;

• pay dividends on, redeem or repurchase our capital  stock;

• repurchase or redeem our subordinated debt;

• make certain acquisitions and investments;

• create or incur liens;

• engage in transactions with affiliates;

• create unrestricted subsidiaries;

• enter into agreements that restrict distributions or  other payments from our  restricted

subsidiaries to us;

• enter into sale-leaseback transactions;

• consolidate, merge or transfer all  or substantially  all of our assets;  and

• engage in certain business activities.

Our failure to comply with these covenants could result  in an event  of  default that, if not cured or

waived, could result in the acceleration of all  of our indebtedness. We would not have sufficient
working capital to satisfy our debt obligations  in the event of an acceleration  of  all  or a significant
portion of our outstanding indebtedness.

We  may be prevented from taking advantage of  business opportunities  that arise because of the

limitations imposed on us by the restrictive covenants contained in our  revolving  credit facility and the
indenture governing the Senior Notes. Our  ability  to  comply  with the  financial  ratios and financial
condition tests under our revolving credit facility  may be affected  by events beyond our control and, as
a result, we may be unable to meet these  ratios and financial  condition  tests. These financial ratio
restrictions and financial condition tests  could limit our ability to obtain future financings, make needed
capital expenditures, withstand a future downturn  in our business  or the economy in general or
otherwise conduct necessary corporate activities.

Borrowings under our credit facility are  limited by  our borrowing base,  which is subject to  periodic
redetermination.

The borrowing base under our credit facility is redetermined at least semi-annually,  and the

lenders  holding  662⁄3% of the aggregate commitments or we may request one additional

48

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

redetermination in each six-month period.  Redeterminations are based upon a number of factors,
including commodity prices and reserve levels.  In  addition, our  lenders  have substantial flexibility to
reduce our borrowing base due to subjective  factors. Upon a redetermination,  we could be required to
repay a portion of our bank debt to the  extent our outstanding borrowings at such time exceed the
redetermined borrowing base. We may  not  have sufficient funds  to  make such repayments, which could
result in a default under the terms of  the facility and an acceleration  of the loans  thereunder requiring
us to negotiate renewals, arrange new  financing or sell significant  assets, all of which  could  have a
material adverse effect on our business and financial results.

The inability of one or more of our customers to meet their obligations to us may adversely  affect our
financial results.

Our principal exposures to credit risk  are through  receivables resulting  from the sale of our oil and

natural gas production, which we market to energy marketing companies, refineries  and affiliates. We
had approximately $57.5 million in receivables from  oil and gas  sales at  December  31, 2013.

We  are subject to credit risk due to the concentration of  our oil and natural gas receivables with
several significant customers. This concentration of customers  may impact our overall credit  risk since
these entities may be similarly affected  by changes  in economic and other conditions.  For the year
ended December 31, 2013, sales to Lion Oil Trading  & Transport, Inc., Plains Marketing  LP, and  High
Sierra Crude Oil & Marketing accounted for  approximately 23%, 37%, and 15%, respectively, of our
total sales. We do not require our customers to post  collateral. The inability or failure  of our  significant
customers to meet their obligations to  us or their insolvency  or liquidation may adversely  affect our
financial  results.

Failure to maintain effective internal controls could harm our business  and  operating results  and/or result in
a loss of investor confidence in our financial reports,  which  could  in turn have a  material adverse  effect on
our business and stock price.

Our management does not expect that our internal controls and disclosure controls  will  prevent all
possible error and all fraud. A control  system, no matter how well conceived and operated,  can provide
only reasonable, not absolute, assurance  that the objectives of the control  system are being met. In
addition, the design of a control system must reflect  the fact that there are resource constraints, and
the benefit of controls must be relative  to  their  costs. Because of the  inherent limitations in all control
systems, no evaluation of our controls  can provide  absolute  assurance that all control issues and
instances of fraud, if any, in the Company have  been detected. The design of  any system of controls is
based in part upon the likelihood of  future  events, and  there can be no  assurance that any design will
succeed in achieving its intended goals  under all potential future conditions. Over time, a control may
become  inadequate because of changes  in conditions or  the degree of compliance  with its policies or
procedures may deteriorate. Because  of  inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system,
misstatements due to error or fraud may  occur without detection. If we are unable to maintain effective
internal controls, our business and operating results  could be harmed or investors could lose confidence
in our financial reports, which could have a material  adverse effect on  our  business  and stock price.

Compliance with the reporting and disclosure requirements of a  public  company under the Exchange  Act, the
NYSE rules and the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act  of 2002 and  the Dodd-Frank Act requires a
substantial amount of management’s time  and will continue  to increase our costs.

As a public company with listed securities, we must comply with  laws, rules, regulations  and
requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the Dodd-Frank Act, related  regulations of the
SEC and the requirements of the New  York Stock  Exchange (‘‘NYSE’’), among  other laws, rules,
regulations and requirements. Complying with these laws,  rules, regulations  and requirements occupies

49

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

a significant amount of time of our board  of directors and  management and  will  continue to
significantly increase our costs and expenses.

We may  be involved in legal proceedings  that may result in  substantial  liabilities.

Like many oil and gas companies, we are from time to time involved  in various  legal and other

proceedings, such as title, royalty or contractual disputes,  regulatory compliance matters  and personal
injury or property damage matters, in  the ordinary course of our business. Such legal proceedings are
inherently uncertain and their results  cannot be predicted. Regardless  of the outcome,  such proceedings
could have an adverse impact on us because  of  legal costs, diversion  of  management and other
personnel and other factors. In addition,  it is possible  that a resolution of one or more  such
proceedings could result in liability, penalties or  sanctions, as  well as judgments, consent decrees  or
orders requiring a change in our business practices, which could  materially and adversely affect our
business, operating results and financial  condition.  Accruals for  such liability, penalties  or sanctions may
be insufficient. Judgments and estimates to determine  accruals or range of losses related to legal and
other proceedings could change from  one period to the next,  and  such changes could be material.

Certain federal income tax deductions currently  available  with respect to  oil  and gas exploration and
development may be eliminated as a result  of future legislation.

There have been proposals for legislative changes  that, if  enacted into law, would eliminate certain

key U.S. federal income tax incentives  currently  available to  oil  and natural gas exploration and
production companies. Such changes include, but are not limited to, (i) the repeal  of the percentage
depletion allowance for oil and gas properties;  (ii) the  elimination of current deductions for  intangible
drilling  and development costs; (iii) the elimination of the deduction  for  certain  U.S. production
activities; and (iv)  an extension of the amortization period  for certain geological and geophysical
expenditures. It is unclear whether these  or similar changes will be enacted and,  if  enacted, how soon
any such changes could become effective. Any such changes in U.S.  federal  income  tax law could
eliminate or defer certain tax deductions  within the industry that  are  currently available  with respect  to
oil and gas exploration and development, and any  such change could  negatively affect our financial
condition, results of operations and cash flow.

We are subject to cyber security risks. A  cyber  incident could occur and result  in  information theft, data
corruption, operational disruption or financial loss.

The oil and gas industry has become  increasingly dependent  on digital technologies to conduct
certain exploration, development, production, processing  and  distribution  activities. For example,  we
depend  on digital technologies to interpret  seismic  data, manage  drilling rigs, production equipment
and gathering and transportation systems, conduct reservoir modeling and reserves estimation and
process and record financial and operating data. Pipelines,  refineries, power stations and  distribution
points for both fuels and electricity are becoming more  interconnected by computer  systems. At  the
same time, cyber incidents, including  deliberate attacks  or unintentional events, have  increased.  Our
technologies, systems, networks and those of our vendors, suppliers and other business partners may
become  the target of cyber-attacks or  information security breaches that could result in the
unauthorized release, gathering, monitoring, misuse, loss  or destruction of proprietary and  other
information, or other disruption of our  business  operations. In addition, certain cyber incidents, such as
surveillance, may remain undetected for an extended period. Our systems and  insurance coverage for
protecting against cyber security risks may not be sufficient.

Although to date we have not experienced  any material losses  relating to cyber-attacks, we may

suffer such losses in the future. We may be required to expend significant additional resources to
continue to modify or enhance our protective measures  or to  investigate and remediate any information
security vulnerabilities.

50

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Risks Relating to our Common Stock

We do not intend to pay, and we are currently prohibited  from paying, dividends on  our  common  stock and,
consequently, our stockholders’ only opportunity to achieve a return on  their investment  is if the  price of our
stock appreciates.

We  do not plan to declare dividends on shares of our  common stock in the  foreseeable future.
Additionally, we are currently prohibited from  making any cash dividends  pursuant to the terms  of our
revolving credit facility and our Senior Notes. Consequently, our stockholders’ only opportunity  to
achieve a return on their investment in us will be if  the market price of our  common stock appreciates,
which  may not occur, and the stockholder sells their shares at a profit. There is no  guarantee that the
price of our common stock will ever  exceed the price  that the stockholder  paid.

The market price and trading volume of our common stock  may be volatile and our  stock price  could decline.

The trading price of shares of our common stock has from time to time fluctuated  widely and in

the future may be subject to similar fluctuations. The trading price  of our  common stock may be
affected by a number of factors, including our  operating results,  financial condition, drilling activities,
general conditions in the oil and natural  gas exploration and development industry, general economic
conditions, the securities markets and the risk  factors set  forth in this annual report, which  are
incorporated herein by reference.

Future sales of our common stock in the public market  could lower our  stock price,  and  any  additional  capital
raised by  us through the sale of equity or  convertible securities may  dilute our current stockholders’ ownership
in  us.

If our existing stockholders sell a large number  of shares  of  our common stock in the  public
market, the market price of our common  stock  could decline  significantly. In  addition,  the perception
in the public market that our existing stockholders might sell shares of common  stock  could  depress the
market price of our common stock, regardless  of the actual  plans  of  our existing stockholders. Her
Majesty the Queen in Right of Alberta, in  her own  capacity and as trustee/nominee for certain Alberta
pension clients (‘‘HMQ’’), owns 7,587,859 shares, or approximately 18.83% of our total outstanding
shares. HMQ is party to a registration rights agreement with us.  Pursuant to this agreement, we have
agreed to effect the registration of shares  held by HMQ  if  itso requests  or if we  conduct  other  offerings
of our common stock. In addition, we may issue additional shares of our  common stock, including
securities that are convertible into or exchangeable for, or that  represent  the right to receive,  shares of
common stock or substantially similar securities, which may result in dilution to our stockholders. In
addition, our stockholders may be further  diluted by future issuances  under  our equity incentive plans.

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, as well as Delaware law, contain provisions that  could discourage
acquisition bids or merger proposals, even  if such  acquisition or merger may be in our stockholders’  best
interests.

Our certificate of incorporation authorizes  our board of directors  to  issue preferred stock without

stockholder approval. If our board of directors elects to issue preferred stock, it could be more difficult
for a third party to acquire us. In addition, some provisions of our certificate of incorporation and
bylaws could make it more difficult for  a  third party  to  acquire control  of  us,  even  if the  change of
control would be beneficial to our stockholders, including:

• a classified board of directors, so that  only  approximately  one-third of our directors are elected

each year;

• advance notice provisions for stockholder proposals  and nominations  for elections  to  the board

of directors to be acted upon at meetings of  stockholders; and

51

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

• limitations on the ability of our stockholders  to  call special meetings or act by written consent.

Delaware law prohibits us from engaging in any business combination with any  ‘‘interested

stockholder,’’ meaning generally that  a stockholder who beneficially  owns more than 15% of our stock
cannot acquire us for a period of three  years from the  date this person became  an interested
stockholder, unless various conditions are met, such as approval of the transaction by our board of
directors.

Alberta  Investment Management Corporation may be deemed  to beneficially own or control a significant
portion of our common stock, giving them a  substantial influence over corporate transactions and other
matters. Their interests and the interests  of the  parties  on whose  behalf they  invest  may conflict with our other
stockholders, and the concentration of ownership of our  common stock by  such stockholders will limit  the
influence of public stockholders.

AIMCo, a Canadian corporation and investment manager to HMQ and  certain Alberta pension
funds,  may be deemed to beneficially  own, control or  have substantial  influence  over approximately
18.83% of our outstanding common stock. West Face Capital and AIMCo, on behalf  of HMQ and
certain Alberta pension funds, have entered into an investment management  agreement pursuant to
which  West Face Capital has the right to vote the shares of our common stock held  by  HMQ.
Accordingly, West Face may exert significant  influence  over our  board  of  directors  and substantially
influence the outcome of stockholder votes. Even if  the investment management agreement between
West  Face Capital and AIMCo were  to  be  terminated, AIMCo, on  behalf of HMQ, would have the
ability to exert significant influence over the  Company.

A concentration of ownership in AIMCo’s clients would allow such stockholders to influence,

directly or indirectly and subject to applicable law, significant matters  affecting us, including the
following:

• establishment of business strategy and policies;

• amendment of our certificate of incorporation  or bylaws;

• nomination and election of directors;

• appointment and removal of officers;

• our capital structure; and

• compensation of directors, officers and employees and other  employee-related  matters.

Such a concentration of ownership may have the  effect of delaying,  deterring or preventing a

change in control, a merger, consolidation, takeover or  other business  combination,  and could
discourage a potential acquirer from  making a  tender offer  or  otherwise attempting to obtain control of
us, which could in  turn have an adverse effect  on the  market  price of our common stock. The
significant ownership interest of HMQ  could also adversely affect investors’ perceptions of our
corporate governance.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

Item 2. Properties.

The information required by Item 2. is  contained in Item  1.  Business and is incorporated herein by

reference.

52

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

From time to time, we are subject to legal  proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course

of business. Like other gas and oil producers  and marketers, our  operations  are subject to extensive
and rapidly changing federal and state  environmental, health and safety  and other laws and regulations
governing air emissions, wastewater discharges, and solid and hazardous waste management  activities.
As of the date of this filing, there are  no material pending or overtly threatened legal actions  against us
that of which we are aware.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related  Stockholder Matters and Issuer  Purchases of

Equity Securities.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity. Our common stock is listed on the NYSE  under the

symbol  ‘‘BCEI’’.

The following table sets forth the high and  low intra-day  sales prices per share of our common

stock as reported on the NYSE.

2013
1st Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2nd Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3rd Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4th Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2012
1st Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2nd Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3rd Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4th Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

High

Low

$42.36
40.40
51.32
57.47

$22.25
22.66
24.40
29.03

$28.23
32.06
34.67
41.78

$12.62
14.52
15.00
20.83

Holders. As of February 24, 2014, there were approximately 172 registered holders of our

common  stock.

Dividends. We have not paid any cash dividends since our inception. Covenants contained in our

revolving credit facility and the indenture  governing our Senior  Notes restrict the  payment of cash
dividends on our common stock. We  currently  intend to retain all future earnings  for the  development
and growth of our  business, and we do  not  anticipate declaring or paying  any cash dividends to holders
of our common stock in the foreseeable future.

On February 24, 2014, the last sale price of our common stock, as  reported on  the NYSE, was

$47.44 per share.

53

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities. The following table contains information about our

acquisition of equity securities during the year  ended December 31, 2013:

Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased(1)

Average Price
Paid per
Share

Total Number of
Shares
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced
Program

Maximum
Number  of
Shares that  May
Be Purchased
Under  Programs

January 1, 2013 - January 31, 2013 . . . . .
February 1, 2013 - February 28, 2013 . . .
March 1, 2013 - March 31, 2013 . . . . . .
April 1, 2013 - April 30, 2013 . . . . . . . .
May 2, 2013 - May 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . .
June 1, 2013 - June 30, 2013 . . . . . . . . .
July 1, 2013 - July 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . .
August 1, 2013 - August 31, 2013 . . . . . .
September 1, 2013 - September 30, 2013
October 1, 2013 - October 31, 2013 . . . .
November 1, 2013 - November 30, 2013 .
December 1, 2013 - December 31, 2013 .

—
74,994
622
4,719
—
—
1,097
5,327
2,412
1,593
3,979
13,496

Total

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

108,239

—
$34.79
$39.29
$35.73
—
—
$39.95
$38.16
$45.91
$48.52
$51.94
$44.26

$37.34

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

—

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

—

(1) Represent shares that employees  surrendered  back to us that equaled in  value the  amount  of taxes
needed for payroll tax withholding obligations upon the vesting of  restricted stock awards. These
repurchases were not part of a publicly announced program to repurchase  shares of our common
stock, nor do we have a publicly announced program to repurchase shares of our common stock.

Sale of Unregistered Securities. We had no sales of unregistered securities during the quarter

ended December 31, 2013.

Stock Performance Graph. The following performance graph shall not be deemed ‘‘filed’’ for
purposes  of Section 18 of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the ‘‘Exchange Act’’), or
otherwise subject to liabilities under that section and shall not be deemed  to  be  incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933,  as amended,  or the Exchange Act, except as
shall be  expressly set forth by specific  reference in such  filing.

The following graph compares, the cumulative total  stockholder return  for  the Company’s common

stock, the Standard and Poor’s 500 Stock Index (the ‘‘S&P  500 Index’’) and the  Standard and Poor’s
500 Oil & Gas Exploration & Production  Index (‘‘S&P  O&G E&P Index’’). The measurement points in
the graph below are December 14, 2011 (the first trading day of our  common  stock  on the  NYSE) and
each  fiscal quarter thereafter through December 31, 2013.  The  graph assumes that $100  was  invested
on December 14, 2011 in the common stock of Bonanza Creek Energy,  Inc., the S&P  500 Index and
the S&P O&G E&P Index and assumes  reinvestment of any dividends. The stock price performance on
the following graph is not necessarily  indicative of future stock price  performance.

54

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

$300

$250

$200

$150

$100

$50

$0
9/30/11 12/31/11 3/31/12

6/30/12

9/30/12 12/31/12 3/31/13

6/30/13

9/30/13 12/31/13

Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc.

S&P 500

S&P Oil & Gas E&P Select Industry Index

25FEB201400574545

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

The selected historical financial data should  be  read in conjunction with Management’s  Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and  Results of  Operations and financial statements and the notes to
those financial statements in Item 8, Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

55

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

The following tables set forth selected historical financial  data of the Company as of and for the

period indicated.

Period from
Inception
(December 23,
2010) to
December 31,
2010)

Year Ended
December 31,
2011

Year Ended
December 31,
2012

Year Ended
December 31,
2013

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

Statement of Operations Data:
Revenues:

Oil sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Natural gas sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Natural gas liquids and CO2 sales
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total revenues

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 1,200
207
213

1,620

$ 79,568
13,442
12,714

105,724

$195,175
19,795
16,235

231,205

$357,001
46,490
18,369

421,860

Operating expenses:

Lease operating . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Severance and ad  valorem taxes
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exploration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation, depletion and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impairment of oil and gas properties(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
General and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Employee stock compensation(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total operating expenses

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Income from operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other income (expense):

Interest  expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Derivative gain (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total other expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes . . . . . . . . .
Income tax benefit (expense) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Income (loss) from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Discontinued operations(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss from operations associated with oil and gas  properties held for
sale (including impairments in 2011,  and 2012  of  $3.4 million and
$1.6 million, respectively)(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sale of oil and gas properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax (expense) benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Income (loss) from discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

419
66
—
436
—
324
—

1,245

375

(58)
(561)
—

(619)

(244)
90

(154)

(13)
—
5

(8)

18,253
5,918
878
28,014
623
13,164
4,449

71,299

34,425

(4,017)
(2,799)
(110)

(6,926)

27,499
(12,890)

14,609

(3,610)
—
1,692

(1,918)

30,695
13,674
10,715
66,202
611
26,922
4,483

153,302

77,903

(4,133)
925
(133)

(3,341)

74,562
(29,991)

44,571

(927)
4,192
(1,313)

1,952

47,771
27,203
4,213
140,176
—
42,864
12,638

274,865

146,995

(21,972)
(12,472)
(43)

(34,487)

112,508
(42,926)

69,582

(644)
—
246

(398)

Net income (loss)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ (162)

$ 12,691

$ 46,523

$ 69,184

Basic net income (loss) per common share

Income from continuing operations per share . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income (loss) from discontinued operations  per  share . . . . . . .
Net income per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted net income (loss) per common share

Income from continuing operations per share . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income (loss) from discontinued operations  per  share . . . . . . .
Net income per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted weighted-average commons shares outstanding . . . . . . . . .

$ —
$ —
$ —
29,123

$ —
$ —
$ —
29,123

$
$
$

$
$
$

0.49
(0.06)
0.43
29,324

0.49
(0.06)
0.43
29,324

$
$
$

$
$
$

1.12
0.05
1.17
39,052

1.12
0.05
1.17
39,052

$
$
$

$
$
$

1.73
(0.01)
1.72
39,337

1.72
(0.01)
1.71
39,404

(1)

In connection with our IPO, the  Company distributed 243,945  fully vested shares  of former Class  B common stock,  previously held
in trust, to our employees and recorded  a  $4.1 million stock-based compensation charge. In addition the Company  distributed the
remaining 10,000 shares of our former Class  B common stock to our executives  and employees. In connection with our IPO, the
10,000 shares of our former Class B  common stock converted into 437,787 shares  of restricted common stock, vesting  over  a three
year period. In connection with our Long Term  Incentive Plan (‘‘LTIP’’),  the Company granted  310,439 and  731,034 shares of
restricted common stock during 2013 and 2012,  respectively, which vest over a  three year period, and 41,622 shares  of performance
share units during 2013, which vest entirely after a three-year measurement period. The Company expects to recognize
compensation expense relating to these grants during the years ended  December  31, 2014, 2015, and 2016 of approximately
$11.0 million, $5.7 million, and $1.5 million,  respectively.

(2)

The impairment for 2011 was related to steam flooding results in our  legacy California assets that were lower than expected  and the
impairment of one non-core field in Southern  Arkansas  was related to the loss of a lease.  The impairments for  2012 were related to
one non-core field in Southern Arkansas and  our legacy California assets that  were written down to their expected sales price.

56

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

(3)

The results of operation and impairment  loss related to non-core properties in California sold in  2012 or held for sale have been
reflected  as discontinued operations. Please refer to Note 3—Discontinued Operations to our  consolidated financial statements in
Item 8, Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property and equipment, net (excludes  assets held for

As of December 31,

2010

2011

2012

2013

(in thousands)

$

— $

2,090

$

4,268

$ 180,582

sale) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

481,374

618,229

943,175

1,267,249

Oil and gas properties held for sale,  net of
accumulated  depreciation,  depletion,  and
amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long term debt, including current portion:

Credit  facility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Senior Notes, net of unamortized premium . . . . . . .
Total stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

15,208
516,104

9,896
664,349

582
1,002,490

360
1,545,935

55,400
—
356,380

6,600
—
527,982

158,000
—
578,518

—
508,847
656,028

Inception
(December  23,
2010) to
December 31, 2010

Year Ended
December 31,  2011

Year Ended
December  31, 2012

Year Ended
December 31,  2013

(in thousands)

Selected Cash Flow Data:
Net cash provided by (used in)

operating  activities . . . . . . . .

$(1,586)

$ 60,627

$ 157,636

$ 307,015

Net cash (used in) investing

activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Net cash provided by financing

activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(864)

—

(161,926)

(305,277)

(465,223)

103,389

149,819

334,522

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Executive  Summary

We  are a Denver-based exploration and  production company focused on the extraction of oil  and

associated liquids-rich natural gas in  the United States. Our predecessors  were founded in 1999 and  we
went public in December 2011. Our  shares of common stock are listed for trading  on the NYSE under
the symbol ‘‘BCEI.’’

Our oil and liquids-weighted assets are  concentrated primarily in  the Wattenberg Field in
Colorado, part of the Rocky Mountain  region, and the  Dorcheat  Macedonia  Field in southern
Arkansas, part of the Mid-Continent region.  In  addition, we own and  operate oil-producing assets in
other fields in Arkansas and the North Park Basin in  Colorado. During the second quarter of 2012, we
began the divestiture process for all of  our  California properties,  with one property  remaining  to  be
sold as of December 31, 2013. Under  generally accepted  accounting  principles, the  results of operations
for the California properties are presented as discontinued  operations and are included unless
otherwise noted. Our management team has extensive experience  acquiring  and operating oil and gas
properties and significant expertise in horizontal drilling  and fracture stimulation, which we  believe will
continue to contribute to the development of our sizable  inventory of projects.  We maintain a  high
working interest in our properties.

57

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Financial and Operating Highlights

Our 2013 financial results included:

• Net income of $69.2 million (including $69.6 million from  continuing operations), as compared

with $46.5 million (including $44.6 million from continuing operations) for 2012;

• Cash flows provided by operating activities of $307.0  million,  as compared with $157.6 million in

2012;

• Capital expenditures of $447.1 million, as compared with $340.9 million  in 2012; and

• Total liquidity of $595.0 million at December 31,  2013, consisting of year-end cash balance plus
funds available under our credit facility, as compared  with $123.3  million  at December 31, 2012.
Please refer to Liquidity and Capital Resources below for additional discussion.

We  delivered significant growth in 2013. Operational highlights for 2013  included:

• Increased production by 74% to 5,902.7 MBoe  in 2013 from 3,387.9 MBoe in  2012, with oil and
NGL production representing 72% of total production.  Production  volumes exclude production
from discontinued operations. Please refer  to  the caption  Production  Results below for additional
discussion;

• Decreased average production costs per Boe by 11% to  $8.09 per Boe in 2013  from $9.06 per
Boe in 2012, primarily as a result of  the increasing mix of production generated by horizontal
wells in the Wattenberg Field;

• Increased proved reserves to 69.8 MMBoe  as of December 31, 2013,  an increase  of  32% from

December 31, 2012;

• Realized positive drilling results on  Wattenberg Field  catalyst wells which included the
delineation of the Niobrara C bench  and  Codell formation, 40-acre downspacing  in the
Niobrara B bench and additional extended reach lateral wells  in the  Niobrara B  bench;

• Demonstrated early success on three pilot projects that  tested  5-acre wells  in the Dorcheat

Macedonia  Field;

• Increased the amount of our borrowing  base  under our revolving credit facility  from

$325 million to $450 million. Please refer to Liquidity and Capital Resources below for additional
discussion.

Senior Management Change

Effective January 31, 2014, the Company’s President and  CEO, Michael  R. Starzer, retired from

his position and as a member of the  Company’s  Board. The Board  has begun a search for a new
President and CEO. During this interim period, Marvin M.  Chronister, a current member of the Board,
will act as interim President and CEO.  Mr. Chronister has over  38 years of oil  and gas  industry
experience and has served on the Company’s Board since March 2011.

Outlook for 2014

Because the global economic outlook, central bank policies and  commodity price  environment are

uncertain, we have planned a flexible  capital  spending program. We estimate our  total capital
expenditures for 2014 to be in the range of $575 million to $625  million, allocating approximately 87%
to the Wattenberg Field and 13% to  southern Arkansas. Actual  capital expenditures are subject  to a
number of factors, including economic  conditions  and  commodity  prices, and the Company may reduce
or augment the capital budget as appropriate. This capital  investment is  expected to produce 2014

58

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

average sales volumes of 23,000 Boe/d to 25,000 Boe/d, while  maintaining a strong oil and liquids
profile.

Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis should be read in  conjunction with our  consolidated  financial

statements and the notes thereto contained in Item  8, Part II of this Annual  Report on  Form 10-K.
Comparative results of operations for  the period indicated are discussed below.

The table below presents revenues, sales  volumes, and average sales prices for  the years ended

December 31, 2013 and 2012:

Revenues:
Crude oil sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Natural gas sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Natural gas liquids sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CO2 sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Product revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Sales volumes:
Crude oil (MBbls) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Natural gas (MMcf) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Natural gas liquids (MBbls) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Crude oil equivalent (MBoe)(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Average Sales Prices (before derivatives)(2):
Crude oil (per Bbl) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Natural gas (per Mcf) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Natural gas liquids (per Bbl) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Crude oil equivalent (per Boe)(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average Sales Prices (after derivatives)(2):
Crude oil (per Bbl) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Natural gas (per Mcf) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Natural gas liquids (per Bbl) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Crude oil equivalent (per Boe)(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

For the Years Ended December 31,

2013(3)

2012(3)

Change

(in thousands, except percentages)

Percent
Change

$357,001
46,490
18,256
113

$195,175
19,795
15,811
424

$161,826
26,695
2,445
(311)

83%
135%
15%
(73)%

$421,860

$231,205

$190,655

82%

3,887.2
9,975.9
352.8

5,902.7

2,191.0
5,473.2
284.7

3,387.9

1,696.2
4,502.7
68.1

2,514.8

$
$
$
$

$
$
$
$

91.84
4.66
51.74
71.45

88.82
4.70
51.74
69.53

89.08
$
$
3.62
$ 55.54
68.12
$

88.40
$
$
3.76
$ 55.54
67.91
$

$
$
$
$

$
$
$
$

2.76
1.04
(3.80)
3.33

0.42
0.94
(3.80)
1.62

77%
82%
24%

74%

3%
29%
(7)%
5%

0%
25%
(7)%
2%

(1) Determined using the ratio of 6 Mcf of natural gas to 1 Bbl  of crude oil.  Excludes CO2 sales.

(2) The derivatives economically hedge the  price we receive for crude oil  and natural gas.

(3) Amounts reflect results for continuing  operations and  exclude results for  discontinued operations
related to non-core properties in California sold or  held for sale as  of December 31, 2013  and
2012.

Revenues increased by 82%, to $421.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to
$231.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2012  due  primarily  to  increased production, but higher
crude oil and natural gas prices also  contributed. Oil,  natural  gas, and natural gas  liquids production
increased 77%, 82%, and 24%, respectively, during the year ended  December 31,  2013, when  compared
to the year ended December 31, 2012.  During  the period from January  1, 2013 through December 31,
2013, we drilled and completed 73 gross (67.2 net) wells  in the Rockies and  45 gross (36.5 net) wells in
southern Arkansas. The increased volumes are  a direct  result of the  $447.1 million expended for
drilling  and completion during the year ended December 31,  2013. Oil volumes increased by 77% in
2013, and the sales price increased 3%  from $89.08 per barrel  during  the year  ended December 31,

59

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

2012 to $91.84 per barrel during the year ended December 31,  2013, which together accounted  for  the
$161.8 million increase in revenues. Natural  gas volumes  increased by  82%  in 2013, and were aided by
an increase in sales price of 29% from $3.62 per Mcf to $4.66 per Mcf  for these one year periods,
which  together accounted for an additional  $26.7 million  of  the increase in revenues. Natural  gas liquid
volumes increased by 24% in 2013, but were  offset by a sales price decline of 7% from  $55.54 per Bbl
to $51.74 per Bbl for the comparable  period. Our  Wattenberg Field natural gas  is sold without
processing into dry gas and NGLs, and therefore, sells at a premium due  to  its high BTU content.

The table below presents operating expenses and per Boe data for the years ended December 31,

2013 and 2012:

For the Years Ended December 31,

2013(1)

2012(1)

Change

(in thousands, except percentages)

Percent
Change

Expenses:
Lease operating . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Severance and ad valorem taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exploration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation, depletion and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impairment of oil and gas properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
General and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 47,771
27,203
4,213
140,176
—
55,502

$ 30,695
13,674
10,715
66,202
611
31,405

$ 17,076
13,529
(6,502)
73,974
(611)
24,097

56%
99%
(61)%
112%
(100)%
77%

Operating  expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$274,865

$153,302

$121,563

79%

Expenses per Boe:
Lease operating . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Severance and ad valorem taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exploration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation, depletion and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impairment of oil and gas properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
General and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

8.09
4.61
0.71
23.75
—
9.40

$

9.06
4.04
3.16
19.54
0.18
9.27

$

(0.97)
0.57
(2.45)
4.21
(0.18)
0.13

(11)%
14%
(78)%
22%
(100)%
1%

Operating  expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

46.56

$

45.25

$

1.31

3%

(1) Amounts reflect results for continuing  operations and  exclude results for  discontinued operations
related to non-core properties in California sold or  held for sale as  of December 31, 2013  and
2012.

Lease operating expense. Our lease operating expenses increased $17.1  million, or  56%,  to

$47.8 million for the year ended December  31, 2013  from $30.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2012 and decreased on an equivalent basis  from $9.06 per Boe to $8.09 per Boe. The
increase in lease operating expense was  related to the increased production volumes attributable  to  our
drilling  program and the operation of an  additional gas plant that  was  constructed during 2012  but did
not come on line until February of 2013. During the year ended  December 31, 2013, three of  the
largest components of lease operating  expenses;  well  servicing, compression, and pumping  increased
$6.8 million, $2.6 million, and $2.3 million, respectively,  over the comparable period in 2012. Gas plant
operating expense, which is a component  of lease operating expense, increased $3.8 million, or 45%,  to
$12.2 million for the year ended December  31, 2013  from $8.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2012. While our lease  operating expense per  Boe  decreased due to higher production
from our lower cost horizontal wells in  the Wattenberg Field we were still impacted by high  gas
gathering pipeline pressures and emission  compliance standards which resulted in  production that was
less  than anticipated. In Southern Arkansas the replacement of essential gas plant processing
equipment cost approximately $400,000  to  install. Our newly constructed gas plant is not yet running  at
full capacity; however the operating cost  of  said  gas plant does  not  vary  based on capacity causing our

60

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

lease operating expense per Boe to be  higher than it would  be  if the gas plant were operating at
capacity.

Severance and ad valorem taxes. Our severance and ad valorem taxes increased  $13.5  million, or

99%, to $27.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 from $13.7  million  for the  year  ended
December 31, 2012. The increase was primarily  related to a 74% increase in production  volumes with a
corresponding 5% increase in average sales price  per  Boe  for the  year ended December 31, 2013  as
compared to the year ended December 31,  2012.

General and administrative. Our general and administrative expense increased  $24.1 million, or
77%, to $55.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 from $31.4  million  for the  year  ended
December 31, 2012 and increased on an equivalent  basis from $9.27 per Boe to $9.40 per Boe. During
the year ended December 31, 2013, wages and benefits,  stock-based compensation,  and professional
service expenses were $13.2 million, $8.2  million,  and $2.7  million  higher, respectively, than the  year
ended December 31, 2012. The increase  in wages and stock-based compensation is primarily due to
increased headcount and incentive compensation, which  is tied directly  to improved  Company results.
The majority of the increase in professional  services relates to outsourced land work performed during
the year relating to our expanded drilling  program.

Depreciation, depletion and amortization. Our depreciation, depletion and amortization  expense

increased $74.0 million, or 112%, to  $140.2 million  for  the year ended December 31, 2013  from
$66.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2012.  Our  depreciation, depletion, and amortization
expense per Boe increased $4.21, to $23.75 for  the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared  to
$19.54 for the year ended December 31,  2012. The increase in depreciation, depletion,  and
amortization expense is primarily due  to  a 55% increase in depreciable assets  at December 31, 2013
when compared to the same period in  2012. The increase  per Boe is related  to  a larger increase in
production of 74% versus the corresponding  increase in proved  developed  reserves of  35%.

Exploration. Our exploration expense decreased $6.5 million,  or 61%, to $4.2  million  in the year
ended December 31, 2013 from $10.7  million in the  year ended December  31, 2012. During 2013,  we
spent $1.5 million on seismic and 3D  data acquisitions for  the Wattenberg  Field, wrote-off one
exploratory dry hole totaling $630,000  and $1.7 million on  an expired non-core lease  in the North Park
Basin, and paid delay rentals in the amount of $300,000.  During  2012, we  wrote-off three exploratory
dry holes in the North Park Basin amounting  to  $8.4 million, we spent $2.0  million  on a seismic
acquisition project in the North Park Basin, and paid delay rentals in the amount of $300,000.

Interest expense. Our interest expense increased $17.9 million, or 437%,  to  $22.0 million for the

year ended December 31, 2013 from $4.1 million for  the year  ended December 31, 2012. The increase
for the year ended December 31, 2013  compared to the year ended December 31,  2012 is primarily
related to the issuance of $500 million  in 6.75%  Senior Notes  during 2013. Interest  expense on the
Senior Notes in 2013 was $17.0 million, of which  $798,000 related to the amortization of debt issuance
costs related to the Senior Notes offering, offset by the amortization of the premium on the Senior
Notes of $153,000. Interest expense on  our  revolving credit facility was $4.1  million for the year ended
December 31, 2013. The average outstanding long-term  debt  balance  during  the year ended
December 31, 2013 was $306.0 million as compared to $74.7 million for the  year ended December 31,
2012.

Derivative gain (loss). Our derivative loss increased $13.4 million, or 1,449%,  to  $12.5 million for
the year ended December 31, 2013 from a $924,000 gain for the comparable period  in 2012. The  loss
incurred on derivative contracts during 2013 was primarily the  result of realized prices  being  greater
than the contract prices. Please refer to Note  12—Derivatives in Item  8, Part II  of this  Annual  Report
on Form 10-K for additional discussion.

61

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Income tax expense. Our estimate for federal and state income  taxes for the  year ended

December 31, 2013 was $42.9 million  from continuing operations as compared  to  $30.0 million for  the
year ended December 31, 2012. We are allowed to deduct various items for tax reporting purposes  that
are capitalized for purposes of financial statement  presentation. Our effective tax rate  for the  year
ended December 31, 2013 was 38.2% as compared  to  40.2% for  the year  ended December 31,  2012,
these rates differ from the U.S. statutory income tax rate primarily due  to the effects of  state income
taxes.

Year Ended December 31, 2012 Compared to Year Ended December 31,  2011

The table below presents revenues, sales  volumes, and average sales prices for  the years ended

December 31, 2012 and 2011:

Revenues (In thousands, except percentages)
Crude oil sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Natural gas sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Natural gas liquids sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CO2 sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Product revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Sales volumes:
Crude oil (MBbls) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Natural gas (MMcf) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Natural gas liquids (MBbls) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Crude oil equivalent (MBoe)(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Average Sales Prices (before derivatives)(2):
Crude oil (per Bbl) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Natural gas (per Mcf) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Natural gas liquids (per Bbl) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Crude oil equivalent (per Boe)(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average Sales Prices (after derivatives)(2):
Crude oil (per Bbl) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Natural gas (per Mcf) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Natural gas liquids (per Bbl) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Crude oil equivalent (per Boe)(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

For the Year Ended December 31,

2012(3)

2011

Change

Percent
Change

$195,175
19,795
15,811
424

$ 79,568
13,442
12,358
356

$115,607
6,353
3,453
68

$231,205

$105,724

$125,481

2,191.0
5,473.2
284.7

3,387.9

887.4
2,773.1
183.8

1,533.4

1,303.6
2,700.1
100.9

1,854.5

$

$

89.08
3.62
55.54
68.12

88.40
3.76
55.54
67.91

$ 89.67
4.85
67.23
68.72

$

85.51
5.09
67.23
66.75

$

$

(0.59)
(1.23)
(11.69)
(0.60)

2.89
(1.33)
(11.69)
1.16

145%
47%
28%
19%

119%

147%
97%
55%

121%

(1)%
(25)%
(17)%
(1)%

3%
(26)%
(17)%
2%

(1) Determined using the ratio of 6 Mcf of natural gas to 1 Bbl  of crude oil.  Excludes CO2 sales.

(2) The derivatives economically hedge the  price we receive for crude oil  and natural gas.

(3) Amounts reflect results for continuing  operations and  exclude results for  discontinued operations
related to non-core properties in California sold or  held for sale as  of December 31, 2012.

Revenues increased by 119%, to $231.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared

to $105.7 million for the year ended  December 31, 2011. Oil, natural gas, and natural  gas liquids
production increased 147%, 97%, and 55%, respectively, during the year  ended December 31,  2012, as
compared to the year ended December 31,  2011. During the period from January  1, 2012 through
December 31, 2012, we drilled 108 gross  (104.7  net)  wells in  the Rockies  and 42  gross 37.2  wells in
southern Arkansas. The increased volumes are  a direct  result of the  $165.5 million expended for
drilling  and completion and gas plant  capital expenditures during the year ended December 31, 2011,
and the $340.8 million expended during the  year  ended December 31, 2012. Oil  prices were
commensurate period over period and  increased  oil volumes  accounted for nearly  all  of the

62

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

$115.6 million of the total $125.5 million increase in  revenues for  the  Company for the year ended
December 31, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011.  Natural gas volumes increased  by  97% in
2012, but were partially offset by a sales price decline of 25% from $4.85  per  Mcf to $3.62 per Mcf for
these one year periods and accounted for $6.4  million  of  the total $125.5  million increase in revenues
for the year ended December 31, 2012.  Natural gas liquid volumes increased by 55% in  2012, but were
partially offset by a sales prices decline of 17% from $67.23 per Bbl to $55.54  per  Bbl for  these one
year periods and accounted for $3.5 million  of  the total $125.5 million increase in revenues for  the year
ended December 31, 2012. Our Wattenberg Field natural  gas is  sold  without processing and sells at  a
premium due to its very high BTU content. Our  production of oil, natural gas, and natural  gas liquids
for year ended December 31, 2012 was approximately 65%, 27% and 8%, respectively,  of total
production.

The table below presents operating expense amount and per  Boe  data for the years ended

December 31, 2012 and 2011:

For the Years Ended December 31,

2012(1)

2011

Change

Percent
Change

Expenses (in thousands, except percentages):
Lease operating . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Severance and ad valorem taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
General and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation, depletion and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exploration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impairment of oil and gas properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 30,695
13,674
31,405
66,202
10,715
611

$18,253
5,919
17,613
28,014
877
623

$12,442
7,755
13,792
38,188
9,838
(12)

68%
131%
78%
136%
1,122%
(2)%

Operating  expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$153,302

$71,299

$82,003

115%

Expenses per Boe:
Lease operating . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Severance and ad valorem taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
General and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation, depletion and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exploration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impairment of oil and gas properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

9.06
4.04
9.27
19.54
3.16
0.18

$ 11.90
3.86
11.49
18.27
0.57
0.41

$ (2.84)
0.18
(2.22)
1.27
2.59
(0.23)

Operating  expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

45.25

$ 46.50

$ (1.25)

(24)%
5%
(19)%
7%
454%
(56)%

(3)%

(1) Amounts reflect results for continuing  operations and  exclude results for  discontinued operations
related to non-core properties in California sold or  held for sale as  of December 31, 2012.

Lease operating expense. Our lease operating expenses increased $12.4  million, or  68%,  to

$30.7 million for the year ended December  31, 2012  from $18.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2011 and decreased on an equivalent basis  from $11.90 per Boe to $9.06 per Boe. The
increase in lease operating expense was  related to increased  production volumes attributable to our
drilling  program and the operation of an  additional gas plant that  was  constructed during 2011  that
came on line during September of 2011. Gas plant operating expense, which is  a component of lease
operating expense, increased $1.1 million, or 15%,  to  $8.4 million for the year ended December 31,
2012 from $7.3 million for the year ended December  31, 2011. A portion of  the increase in  gas plant
operating expense was related to the replacement of  a heat exchanger which cost approximately
$0.6 million to procure and install. During the year ended  December  31, 2012, well  servicing, rental
equipment, pumping and gauging, and  insurance expenses were $8.3 million, $1.7 million, $0.4 million
and $0.6 million higher, respectively, than the year ended  December 31,  2011. The decrease in lease
operating expense on an equivalent basis  was  primarily related to our transition from vertical  wells to
horizontal wells in the Wattenberg Field during 2012.

63

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Severance and ad valorem taxes. Our severance and ad valorem taxes increased  $7.8  million, or

131%, to $13.7 million for the year ended  December  31, 2012 from  $5.9 million for  the year  ended
December 31, 2011. The increase was primarily  related to a 121% increase  in production volumes  and
higher  ad valorem tax assessments. The  increase  in severance and ad valorem  taxes on  a Boe basis for
the year ended December 31, 2012 as  compared to the  year ended December  31, 2011 was  related to
oil severance taxes and ad valorem taxes that  were $4.2  million  and  $3.2 million,  respectively, higher
than the comparable period in the previous year.

General and administrative. Our general and administrative expense increased  $13.8 million, or
78%, to $31.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $17.6  million  for the  year  ended
December 31, 2011. During the year ended  December 31,  2012, wages, benefits and employee
placement fees were $10.2 million higher than the year ended December 31,  2011 due to our
headcount increasing as the result of our accelerated  drilling program  and  the addition of accounting,
legal and  IT positions that were previously  outsourced. During the  year ended December  31, 2012,
accounting fees were $0.4 million higher  due  to  a one-time payment that  was made  to  our  outsource
accounting provider to terminate our agreement with them. Also during  the year  ended December 31,
2012, legal fees and franchise taxes were $2.1 million and $0.5  million higher,  respectively. The  majority
of the increased general and administrative expense was due to hiring a large  number of  personnel to
support our growth and the regulatory  compliance  obligations of a newly  public company and  legal fees
associated with arbitration related to claims of a  former chairman of BCEC.

Depletion, depreciation and amortization. Our depletion, depreciation and amortization  expense

increased $38.2 million, or 136%, to  $66.2 million  for  the year ended December 31, 2012  from
$28.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2011.  Our  depreciation, depletion and amortization
expense per Boe produced increased $1.27  to  $19.54 for  the year ended December 31, 2012 as
compared to $18.27 for the year ended December  31, 2011. This increase  was  primarily  the result of a
121% increase in production period over period  that was compounded by proved reserve and  proved
developed reserve volume growth that  was  not commensurate  with the costs additions to the depletion
base. At December 31, 2012, we revised our proved reserves downward by 6,938 MBoe due primarily to
a combination of eliminating 50 locations  from proved undeveloped reserves  as a result of changes in
focus from vertical to horizontal development  and lower performance  than expected from our vertical
wells in the Wattenberg Field.

Impairment of oil and gas properties. The Company recorded $0.6 million of proved property

impairment in one non-core field in southern Arkansas for the year ended December 31, 2012. The
Company recorded $0.6 million of proved property impairment in one non-core field in southern
Arkansas for the year ended December  31, 2011.

Exploration. Our exploration expense increased $9.8 million, or 1,122%, to $10.7 million  in the
year ended December 31, 2012 from $0.9 million in the year  ended  December 31, 2011. During the
year ended December 31, 2012 the following  items were charged to exploration expense: a  seismic
acquisition project in the amount of $2.0 million was conducted in the North Park Basin; three
exploratory locations in the North Park Basin  in the amount of  $8.4 million  were written off; and delay
rentals in the amount of $0.3 million were  paid.  During  the year  ended December 31, 2011,  our
exploration costs consisted primarily of the acquisition of 7,700 acres of 3-D seismic data on  the eastern
edge of the Wattenberg Field in Weld County  Colorado to help evaluate our Niobrara oil shale
acreage.

Interest expense. Our average debt outstanding for the  year ended December 31, 2012 was

$74.7 million as compared to $95.3 million for the year ended December  31, 2011. Our interest expense
for the year ended December 31, 2012  was  commensurate with the year ended December 31, 2011 due
to accretion expense in the amount of $0.3  million related to our contractual obligation for the lease

64

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

acquisition in the Wattenberg Field and  fees of $50,000 related to our $48 million  letter of credit
obligation which secures the acquisition.

Derivative gain (loss). Our derivative gain increased $3.7 million, or  132%, to a gain of $924,000

for the year ended December 31, 2012  compared to a loss of $2.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2012. The gain experienced on derivative  contracts during 2012 was primarily the result
of realized prices being less than the contract prices.

Income tax expense. Our estimate for federal and state income  taxes for the  year ended

December 31, 2012 was $30.0 million  from continuing operations as compared  to  $12.9 million for  the
year ended December 31, 2011. We are allowed to deduct various items for tax reporting purposes  that
are capitalized for purposes of financial statement  presentation. During the year ended  December 31,
2012, the estimated effective tax rate  was revised  to  reflect a 35% rate for federal income taxes. The
Company believes that this rate more appropriately reflects the  future federal rate on future earnings.
The increase in the effective tax rate was applied to the January 1, 2012 deferred income tax liability
resulting in an increase to the net deferred tax liability and deferred income tax  expense of
$1.2 million. Our effective tax rates differ  from the U.S. statutory income tax rate primarily due to the
effects of state income taxes.

Results for Discontinued Operations

During June of 2012, the Company began marketing, with an intent to sell, all of its oil  and gas

properties in California. Assets are classified  as held for sale when  the Company commits to a plan to
sell the assets and there is reasonable certainty that the sale will take place  within one year. The
Company determined that our intent  to  sell  out of  an entire  region qualified for discontinued
operations accounting and these assets are presented as  discontinued operations in the  accompanying
statements of operations and comprehensive income.

The majority of these properties were  sold  in 2012, and the operating results  before  income  taxes
for our  California properties for the year ended December 31,  2013 were  net revenues  of  $1.7 million,
and operating expenses of $2.3 million,  as compared to net revenues of $5.4  million, and operating
expenses of $6.3 million, of which, $1.6 million  is due to impairments  of  proved properties, for the year
ended December 31, 2012. Sales volumes for the years ended  December 31, 2013 and 2012 were
47 Boe/d and 147 Boe/d, respectively.

The operating results before income  taxes for our California properties  for the  year  ended
December 31, 2011 were net revenues  of $6.7  million, and operating expenses of  $10.3 million.
Operating expenses for the year ended  December 31, 2011  included impairments in the amount of
$3.4 million. Sales volumes for the year ended December 31,  2011 were 181 Boe/d.

Please refer to Note 3—Discontinued  Operations  in Item 8,  Part II  of this  Annual  Report on

Form 10-K for additional discussion.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We  fund our operations, capital expenditures  and  working capital requirements with cash  flows
from our operating activities and borrowings under our  revolving  credit facility. Periodically,  we access
debt and capital markets and sell non-core properties  to  provide additional liquidity.

We  believe that our cash on hand, cash flow from operating activities and  availability under our

revolving credit facility will be sufficient to fund  our planned capital expenditures and  operating
expenses and comply with our debt covenants for at  least the next 12 months. To the extent actual
operating results differ from our anticipated results; our liquidity could be adversely affected.

65

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

On April 9, 2013, we sold $300 million of 6.75%  Senior Notes  that mature  on April 15, 2021.
Interest on the Senior Notes began accruing on April 9, 2013, and we  will  pay interest  on April 15 and
October 15 of each year, which began  on October 15, 2013.  On November  15, 2013, we sold an
additional $200 million aggregate principal amount of 6.75% Senior Notes, above par, as  an additional
issuance of our existing Senior Notes that mature on April 15, 2021. The Senior  Notes are  fully and
unconditionally guaranteed on a senior  unsecured basis  by our existing and future subsidiaries that
incur or guarantee certain indebtedness,  including indebtedness  under our revolving credit  facility. We
may redeem the Senior Notes (i) at any  time on or after April 15,  2017 at  the redemption price equal
to 100% together with accrued and unpaid  interest, and (ii) prior to April 15, 2017  at the
‘‘make-whole’’ redemption prices described in the indenture  together with  accrued and  unpaid interest.
The net proceeds from the sales of the Senior Notes were  approximately $497.3 million after the
premium and deduction of $11.7 million of expenses  and underwriting discounts  and commissions.  The
proceeds were used to repay all of the  then outstanding balance under  our revolving credit facility  and
for general corporate purposes including funding  the Company’s drilling  and development  program and
other capital expenditures.

On May 15, 2013, the borrowing base under  our revolving credit facility was increased to
$330 million. On November 6, 2013,  the lenders completed their semi-annual borrowing base
redetermination which resulted in an  increase of the available  borrowing base to $450 million. Pursuant
to the corresponding amendment, the Company elected to limit  bank commitments at $330 million
while reserving the option to access, at  the Company’s request,  the full $450 million  prior to the next
semi-annual redetermination. The maturity date of the  credit facility  was  also extended by one  year to
September 15, 2017. As of December  31, 2013, we  had nil  outstanding, $36  million of  letters of credit
issued, and $414 million of borrowing  capacity available under our credit facility.  Our weighted-average
interest rate on borrowings from our  credit facility was  2.34%  and 1.94% (excluding amortization of
deferred financing costs and the accretion of our contractual  obligation  for land acquisition)  during the
years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012,  respectively. See the Credit facility  section  below  for
additional  discussion.

In the second quarter 2012, we began the divestiture  process of our  non-core  properties in

California. The California properties  were treated as assets held for sale,  and  production, revenue and
expenses associated with these properties were removed from continuing operations and reported as
discontinued operations. During 2012,  we sold a  majority of our properties in California,  for
approximately $9.3 million in aggregate. As of December 31, 2013, we continued to own  an immaterial
operated  working interest in the Midway-Sunset Field, which is expected to be sold in the first half of
2014.

On July 31, 2012, we acquired leases in  the Wattenberg  Field from the State of Colorado, State
Board of Land Commissioners. We paid approximately $12  million at  closing, another $12 million on
July 31st of 2013, and will pay approximately $12 million on  July 31st of each of the next three years.
These future payments are secured by  a  letter of credit which reduced our availability under the
borrowing base by $36 million as of December 31, 2013.

We  expect that in the future our commodity derivative positions  will help  us  stabilize  a portion of
our  expected cash flows from operations  despite potential declines in  the price of oil and  natural gas.
Please  see  Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative  Disclosures on  Market Risks for a summary of
derivatives in place.

66

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

The following table summarizes our cash flows and other financial measures  for the  periods

indicated.

Financial Measures:

Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash (used in) investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash provided by financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisitions of oil and gas properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exploration and development of oil and gas properties,

investment in gas processing facility, and obligation  on land
acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Cash flows provided by operating activities

For the Years Ended December 31,

2013

2012

2011

(in thousands)

$ 307,015
(465,223)
334,522
180,582
13,797

$ 157,636
(305,277)
149,819
4,268
13,920

$ 60,627
(161,927)
103,389
2,090
1,810

435,037

297,114

156,871

During 2013, we generated $307.0 million of cash provided  by operating activities, an increase  of
$149.4 million from 2012. The increase  in  cash flows from  operating activities resulted primarily from
an increase in production of 74% compounded  with a  5% increase in  realized  sales  prices on  an
equivalent basis. These positive factors were  partially  offset  by increased lease operating expense,
production taxes, cash portion of general and administrative  expense, and cash portion of interest
expense during 2013 as compared to  2012. See  Results of Operations above for more information on  the
factors driving these changes.

Net cash provided by operating activities  increased $97.0 million  for  the year  ended December 31,

2012, compared to the same period in  2011.  The  increase in  cash flows from  operating activities
resulted primarily from an increase in production of  121% partially offset by a  1% decrease in realized
sales prices on an equivalent basis. Production was further offset by  increased lease operating  expense,
production taxes, cash portion of general and administrative  expense, and cash portion of interest
expense during 2012 as compared to  2011. See  Results of Operations above for more information on  the
factors driving these changes.

Cash flows (used in) investing activities

Expenditures for development of oil  and  natural gas  properties and  natural  gas plants are  the

primary use of our capital resources.  Net cash used in investing activities  for the  year ended
December 31, 2013 increased $159.9  million, compared to the same period in 2012. For the year ended
December 31, 2013, cash used for the acquisition of oil  and gas  properties was $13.8  million,  cash used
for the development of oil and natural gas  properties (including  cash used for natural  gas plant capital
expenditures) was $435.0 million, and cash used for non-oil and gas property  additions  was $5.1 million.
For the year ended December 31, 2012,  cash used for the  acquisition  of oil and gas properties was
$13.9 million, cash used for the development of oil  and  natural  gas properties (including cash used for
natural gas plant capital expenditures)  was $297.1 million,  cash used for non-oil and  gas property
additions was $3.1 million, and cash received  for the  sale of non-core  oil  and gas properties in
California was $9.3 million. For the year ended December 31, 2011,  cash  used for  the acquisition of oil
and gas properties was $1.8 million, cash used for the development  of  oil and natural  gas properties
(including cash used for natural gas plant expenditures) was  $156.9 million,  and cash used for non-oil
and gas property additions was $1.2 million.

67

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Cash flows provided by financing activities

Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended  December 31, 2013 increased $184.7,

compared to the same period in 2012.  The issuance of our  Senior  Notes  during  2013 provided
$497.3 million in net proceeds, which was offset  by decreased borrowings on our line of credit of
$49.4 million and increased payments to our credit facility  of $260.0 million for the two comparable
periods. Net cash flows provided by financing  activities for the year ended  December 31,  2012
increased $46.4 million, compared to  the  same period  in 2011. Borrowings on our line  of credit
increased $43.3 million and payments to our credit facility  decreased  $156.9 million, which were offset
by $155.9 million in proceeds from the  sale of  our common  stock  during 2011, for the two comparable
periods.

Credit facility

Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility

The administrative agent of our $600 million Senior  Secured Revolving Credit Facility (‘‘Revolver’’)
is KeyBank National Association. The  Revolver  provides for interest rates plus an  applicable margin to
be determined based on London Interbank Offered  Rate  (‘‘LIBOR’’) or a  bank  base  rate (‘‘Base
Rate’’), at the Company’s election. LIBOR  borrowings  bear  interest at LIBOR plus 1.75%  to  2.75%
depending on the utilization level, and  the  Base Rate  borrowings bear  interest at the ‘‘Bank Prime
Rate,’’ as defined in the Revolver, plus  .75% to 1.75%.

Our approved borrowing base under  the Revolver, which was  $450 million  as of December 31,
2013, is redetermined semiannually by May  15 and November 15 and may be redetermined up to one
additional time between such scheduled determinations upon  our request  or upon  the request of the
required lenders (defined as lenders  holding 662⁄3% of the aggregate commitments). The borrowing
base is determined by the value of our oil and gas reserves. The borrowing  base  is redetermined  (i) in
the sole discretion of the administrative agent  and  all  of  the lenders, (ii) in  accordance with their
customary internal standards and practices for valuing and redetermining the value of oil and gas
properties in connection with reserve based oil and natural gas  loan transactions, (iii) in conjunction
with the most recent engineering report and other information received by  the administrative  agent and
the lenders relating to our proved reserves and (iv) based  upon the  estimated  value of  our proved
reserves as determined by the administrative agent and the  lenders. As  of  December 31, 2013 and
pursuant to the November 2013 Revolver amendment,  the Company  elected to limit  bank  commitments
at $330 million while reserving the option to access, at the Company’s  request,  the full $450  million
prior to the next semi-annual redetermination scheduled  for  May  2014.

As of December 31, 2013, and through the filing date of this  report, we  had  no borrowings

outstanding under our Revolver. The  Revolver  matures  on September  15, 2017. Amounts  borrowed  and
repaid under the Revolver may be reborrowed. The  Revolver may be used only to finance development
of oil and gas properties, for working  capital and for  other general  corporate purposes.

Our obligations under the Revolver are secured by first priority liens on all of our property and

assets (whether real, personal, or mixed, tangible or intangible), including our proved reserves and  our
oil and gas properties (which term is defined to include fee mineral  interests,  term mineral interests,
leases, subleases, farm-outs, royalties,  overriding royalties,  net profit interests,  carried interests,
production payments, back in interests and  reversionary  interests). The Revolver is guaranteed by us
and all of our direct and indirect subsidiaries.

The applicable margin varies on a daily basis  based on the percentage outstanding under the
borrowing base. We incur quarterly commitment fees based on the  unused amount of the  borrowing
base ranging from 0.375% and 0.50% per annum.  We  may prepay loans under the Revolver  at any time
without premium or penalty (other than customary  LIBOR  breakage costs).

68

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

The Revolver contains various covenants limiting our ability to:

• grant or assume liens;

• incur or assume  indebtedness;

• grant negative pledges or agree to  restrict dividends or distributions from subsidiaries;

• sell, transfer, assign or convey assets, or  engage in certain  mergers or acquisitions;

• make certain distributions;

• make certain loans, advances and investments;

• engage in transactions with affiliates;

• enter into sale and leaseback, take-or-pay or hydrocarbon prepayment transactions; or

• enter into certain swap agreements.

The Revolver also contains covenants requiring us to maintain:

• a current ratio (i.e., the ratio of current assets  to  current liabilities) of not less than 1.0 to 1.0

(current assets include, as of the date of calculation, the aggregate of all lender’s  unused
commitment  amounts);  and

• a debt to earnings before interest, taxes,  depreciation  and  amortization  and other  items (as

defined in the Revolver) (‘‘EBITDAX’’) coverage ratio of not more than: 4.00 to 1.00 as  of  the
quarter ending December 31, 2011 and for each quarter thereafter (using  the trailing
four-quarter  EBITDAX).

As of December 31, 2013 and through the filing date of this  report, we  were  in compliance  with all

financial and non-financial covenants.  If an event of default exists  under the Revolver, the  lenders will
be able to accelerate the maturity of  the  loan and exercise other  rights  and  remedies.

The Revolver contains customary events of default, including:

• failure to pay any principal, interest, fees, expenses  or other amounts  when due;

• the failure of any representation or  warranty  to  be  materially true and correct when  made;

• failure to observe any agreement, obligation  or covenant in  the credit  agreement, subject to  cure

periods for certain failures;

• a cross-default for the payment of any  other  indebtedness of  at least $2  million;

• bankruptcy or insolvency;

• judgments against us or our subsidiaries, in excess of $2  million, that are  not  stayed;

• certain ERISA events involving us or  our subsidiaries;  and

• a change in control (as defined in  the Revolver),  including the  ownership by a ‘‘person’’  or

‘‘group’’ (as defined under the Securities  and  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, but excluding
certain permitted stockholders) directly  or indirectly, of more  than 35% of our  common stock,
other than certain of our current stockholders.

69

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Contractual  Obligations

We  have the following contractual obligations and commitments as  of December 31, 2013  (in

thousands):

Payment by Period

Total

Less than
1 Year

1 - 3 Years

3 - 5 Years

More  than
5 Years

Contractual  Obligation
Senior Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest on Senior Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Wattenberg field lease acquisition . . . . . . . . . . .
Derivative  liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating  leases(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
Asset retirement obligations(2)

$500,000
253,125
36,000
6,523
16,871
11,218

$ — $ — $ — $500,000
77,344
—
—
4,834
10,561

67,500
24,000
1,203
4,733
489

40,781
12,000
5,320
2,349
168

67,500
—
—
4,955
—

Total

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$823,737

$60,618

$97,925

$72,455

$592,739

(1) See Note 7—Commitments and Contingent Liabilities to our  consolidated financial statements for a

description of operating leases.

(2) Amount represents our estimate  of  future  retirement obligations on a discounted basis unless
otherwise noted. Because these costs typically extend many years into  the future,  management
prepares estimates and makes judgments  that are subject  to future revisions based upon numerous
factors. The $168,000 included in the less than one year category is not discounted and  is included
in accounts payable and accrued expenses  as of December 31, 2013.

Critical accounting policies and estimates

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results  of operations  are based upon our

consolidated financial statements, which have  been prepared in accordance  with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States. The  preparation of  our financial statements  requires us to
make estimates and assumptions that affect  the reported amounts of assets,  liabilities, revenues  and
expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Certain accounting policies involve
judgments and uncertainties to such an extent that there  is reasonable likelihood that materially
different amounts could have been reported under different conditions, or if different  assumptions  had
been used. We evaluate our estimates  and  assumptions on a regular basis. We base our estimates on
historical experience and various other assumptions  that are  believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis  for making judgments  about  the carrying values of
assets and liabilities that are not readily  apparent from  other sources. Actual results  may differ from
these estimates and assumptions used  in preparation of our consolidated financial  statements. We
provide expanded discussion of our more  significant accounting  policies,  estimates and judgments
below. We believe these accounting policies reflect our  more significant  estimates and assumptions used
in preparation of our consolidated financial statements. See  Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies to our audited consolidated financial  statements  for  a  discussion of additional  accounting
policies and estimates made by management.

Method  of accounting for oil and natural gas properties

Oil and natural gas exploration and development  activities are accounted for using the successful

efforts method. Under this method, all  property acquisition costs and costs of exploratory and
development wells are capitalized at  cost  when incurred, pending determination of whether the well  has
found proved reserves. If an exploratory well does not find  proved reserves,  the costs of  drilling the

70

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

well are charged to expense. The costs  of development  wells are  capitalized whether  productive or
nonproductive. All capitalized well costs and other associated  costs and leasehold costs of  proved
properties are amortized on a unit-of-production basis  over the remaining life  of proved developed
reserves and proved reserves, respectively.

Costs of retired, sold or abandoned properties  that constitute a  part  of  an amortization base

(partial field) are charged or credited,  net of  proceeds, to accumulated depreciation, depletion  and
amortization unless doing so significantly  affects the  unit-of-production  amortization rate  for an  entire
field, in which case a gain or loss is recognized currently. Gains or losses  from the disposal  of
properties are recognized currently.

Expenditures for maintenance, repairs and minor renewals necessary to maintain properties in

operating condition are expensed as  incurred. Major betterments, replacements and  renewals are
capitalized to the appropriate property and  equipment accounts.  Estimated dismantlement and
abandonment costs for oil and natural gas properties are capitalized,  net of salvage, at their  estimated
net present value and amortized on a  unit-of-production basis over the remaining life  of  the related
proved developed reserves.

Unproved properties consist of costs  incurred to acquire  unproved  leases, or lease acquisition

costs. Unproved lease acquisition costs are capitalized  until the leases  expire or when we specifically
identify leases that will revert to the lessor, at which  time we expense the associated unproved lease
acquisition costs. The expensing or expiration  of  unproved  lease acquisition costs  are recorded as
exploration expense in the statements  of operations and comprehensive income in  our  consolidated
financial statements. Lease acquisition  costs related to successful  exploratory drilling  are reclassified to
proved properties and depleted on a unit-of-production  basis.

For sales of entire working interests in unproved properties, gain or loss is recognized to the extent

of the difference between the proceeds received  and the  net carrying value of the  property. Proceeds
from sales of partial interests in unproved properties are  accounted for  as a  recovery of costs  unless the
proceeds exceed the entire cost of the property.

Oil and natural gas reserve quantities and  Standardized Measure

Our independent engineers and technical staff prepare  our estimates of oil and  natural gas
reserves and associated future net revenues.  While  the SEC has  recently adopted  rules which allow us
to disclose proved, probable and possible  reserves,  we have  elected to disclose  only  proved reserves in
this  Annual Report on Form 10-K. The SEC’s revised rules define proved reserves as the  quantities of
oil and gas, which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data,  can be estimated with  reasonable
certainty to be economically producible—from a given date  forward, from  known  reservoirs, and  under
existing economic conditions, operating  methods, and government regulations—prior  to  the time  at
which  contracts providing the right to operate  expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal  is
reasonably certain, regardless of whether deterministic  or probabilistic  methods are  used  for the
estimation. The project to extract the  hydrocarbons must  have commenced or the operator must be
reasonably certain that it will commence the project within a reasonable  time. Our independent
engineers and technical staff must make  a number of subjective assumptions based  on their professional
judgment in developing reserve estimates. Reserve estimates are updated annually and consider  recent
production levels and other technical  information about each field.  Oil  and  natural gas  reserve
engineering is a subjective process of estimating  underground accumulations  of  oil and natural  gas that
cannot be precisely measured. The accuracy of any reserve estimate  is a function of the quality of
available data and of engineering and geological interpretation and judgment.

Periodic revisions to the estimated reserves  and future cash flows  may be necessary as a  result of a

number of factors, including reservoir  performance, new  drilling, oil  and natural gas prices, cost
changes, technological advances, new geological or  geophysical data, or  other  economic factors.

71

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Accordingly, reserve estimates are generally different from  the  quantities  of oil and natural gas that are
ultimately recovered. We cannot predict the amounts  or timing of future reserve revisions. If  such
revisions are significant, they could significantly affect future  amortization of capitalized costs and result
in impairment of assets that may be material.

Revenue recognition

Revenue from our interests in producing wells is recognized when  the product  is delivered, at

which  time the customer has taken title and assumed the risks and rewards  of  ownership, and
collectability is reasonably assured. Substantially all of our  production is sold  to  purchasers under
short-term (less than 12 month) contracts at  market-based prices. The sales prices for oil  and natural
gas are  adjusted for transportation and other related  deductions. These deductions are  based on
contractual or historical data and do not require significant judgment.

Subsequently, these revenue deductions are adjusted to reflect actual  charges based on  third-party

documents. Since there is a ready market  for oil and  natural gas, we  sell the  majority of production
soon after it is produced at various locations. As  a result,  we maintain a minimum amount of product
inventory in storage.

Impairment of proved properties

We  review our proved oil and natural gas properties for impairment whenever events  and
circumstances indicate that a decline  in  the recoverability of their carrying value may have  occurred.
We  estimate the expected undiscounted  future  cash flows of our  oil  and natural gas  properties and
compare such undiscounted future cash flows  to  the carrying  amount  of the oil  and natural gas
properties to determine if the carrying  amount  is recoverable. If the carrying  amount  exceeds  the
estimated undiscounted future cash flows, we will adjust the carrying amount of  the oil and natural gas
properties to fair value. The factors used to determine fair value are subject to our judgment and
expertise and include, but are not limited to, recent sales prices of comparable properties,  the present
value of future cash flows, net of estimated operating and development costs using estimates of proved
reserves, future commodity pricing, future production estimates, anticipated  capital expenditures,  and
various discount rates commensurate  with the risk and current market conditions  associated with
realizing the expected cash flows projected. Because of  the uncertainty inherent in these factors,  we
cannot predict when or if future impairment charges for proved  properties  will  be  recorded.

Impairment of unproved properties

We  assess our unproved properties periodically  for impairment  on a property-by-property  basis

based on remaining lease terms, drilling  results or future plans  to  develop acreage and  record
impairment expense for any decline in  value.

We  have historically recognized impairment  expense for unproved properties at the time when  the
lease term has expired or sooner if, in  management’s judgment, the unproved properties have  lost  some
or all of their carrying value. We consider the following factors in our  assessment of the impairment of
unproved  properties:

• the remaining amount of unexpired term under our leases;

• our ability to actively manage and prioritize our capital expenditures  to drill leases  and to make

payments to extend leases that may be closer to expiration;

• our ability to exchange lease positions  with other  companies  that allow  for higher concentrations

of ownership and development;

72

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

• our ability to convey partial mineral ownership  to  other companies  in exchange  for their drilling

of leases; and

• our evaluation of the continuing successful results  from the application of completion technology
in the Niobrara formation by us or by  other  operators in  areas adjacent to or near  our  unproved
properties.

The assessment of unproved properties  to  determine  any possible impairment requires  significant

judgment.

Asset retirement obligations

We  record the fair value of a liability for a legal obligation to retire  an asset in  the period  in which
the liability is incurred with the corresponding cost  capitalized  by increasing the  carrying amount of the
related long-lived asset. For oil and gas properties,  this is the period in which the well  is drilled or
acquired. The asset retirement obligation  (‘‘ARO’’) for oil and gas properties represents the estimated
amount we will incur to plug, abandon  and  remediate the  properties  at  the end of their productive
lives, in accordance with applicable state  laws. The liability is accreted to its  present  value each  period
and the capitalized cost is depreciated  on  the unit-of-production method.  The  accretion expense is
recorded  as a component of depreciation, depletion  and amortization  in our consolidated statements of
operations and comprehensive income.

We  determine the ARO by calculating the  present  value of estimated cash flows related to the
liability. Estimating the future ARO requires management to make estimates and judgments regarding
timing, existence of a liability, as well  as what constitutes adequate restoration. Inherent in  the fair
value calculation are numerous assumptions and judgments including the  ultimate costs, inflation
factors, credit adjusted discount rates,  timing of settlement and  changes in  the legal, regulatory,
environmental and political environments. To the extent  future revisions to these assumptions impact
the fair value of the existing ARO liability, a corresponding adjustment is made  to  the related  asset.

Derivatives

We  record all derivative instruments on the  balance sheet  as either assets or liabilities measured at
their estimated fair value. We have not designated any derivative instruments as hedges for  accounting
purposes  and we do not enter into such instruments for speculative  trading  purposes. Derivative
instruments are adjusted to fair value  every accounting period.  Derivative  cash settlements and gains
and losses from valuation changes in  the remaining unsettled commodity derivative instruments  are
reported under derivative gain (loss) in  our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive
income.

Stock-based compensation

Restricted Stock Awards. We recognize compensation expense for all restricted  stock awards made
to employees and directors. Stock-based  compensation expense is measured  at the grant  date based on
the fair value of the award and is recognized as an  expense on a straight-line basis  over the requisite
service period, which is generally the vesting period.  The  fair value of restricted  stock grants is  based
on the value of our common stock on  the date  of  grant. Assumptions regarding  forfeiture rates are
subject to change. Any such changes  could result in different valuations  and  thus impact the amount of
stock-based compensation expense recognized. Stock-based compensation expense recorded for
restricted stock awards is included in general and administrative expenses on  our consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive income.

Performance Stock Units. We recognize compensation expense  for all performance stock unit
awards made to officers. Stock-based  compensation expense  is measured  at the  grant date  based on the

73

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

fair value of the award and is recognized  as expense  on a  straight-line basis over the  requisite  service
period, which is generally the vesting  period. The  fair value of the performance stock unit  is measured
at the grant date with a stochastic process  method using the Geometric Brownian Motion  Model
(‘‘GBM Model’’). Stock-based compensation expense recorded  for performance stock  units is  included
in general and administrative expenses on  our  consolidated statements of  operations  and
comprehensive  income.

Income  taxes

Our provision for taxes includes both federal  and  state taxes. We record our  federal income taxes

in accordance with accounting for income taxes  under GAAP which results in the  recognition of
deferred tax assets and liabilities for  the expected future tax consequences of temporary  differences
between the book carrying amounts and  the  tax basis of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax  assets and
liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected  to  apply to taxable income in the years in
which  those temporary differences and carryforwards are expected to be recovered or settled. The
effect on deferred  tax assets and liabilities of a  change in tax rates is recognized in  income  in the
period that includes the enactment date.  A valuation allowance would be established to reduce
deferred tax assets if it is more likely than  not  that the related tax benefits will not be realized. We did
not have a valuation allowance as of  December  31, 2013.

We  apply significant judgment in evaluating  our  tax positions and  estimating our provision for
income taxes. During the ordinary course of business, there are many transactions and  calculations for
which  the ultimate tax determination  is uncertain. The actual  outcome  of these future  tax consequences
could differ significantly from our estimates,  which could impact our financial position, results  of
operations and cash flows.

We  also account for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the  financial statements in
accordance with GAAP by prescribing  a  recognition  threshold and measurement attribute  for a  tax
position taken or expected to be taken  in  a tax  return. Authoritative  guidance  for accounting  for
uncertainty in income taxes requires that we recognize  the financial statement benefit of  a tax  position
only after determining that the relevant  tax authority would more likely than not sustain the position
following an audit. For tax positions  meeting  the more-likely-than-not threshold, the  amount  recognized
in the financial statements is the largest  benefit  that has a  greater than 50%  likelihood of being
realized upon ultimate settlement with  the relevant tax authority.  We did not  have any  uncertain tax
positions as of the year ended December  31, 2013.

Recent accounting pronouncements

In July 2013, the FASB issued Update No.  2013-11—Income Taxes (Topic  740): Presentation of an
Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating  Loss Carryforward,  a Similar Tax  Loss, or a  Tax Credit
Carryforward Exists (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). The update provides
clarification on the presentation of an unrecognized tax  benefit when a net operating loss  carryforward,
a similar tax loss or a tax credit carryforward  exists. The update is  effective for  public entities  for fiscal
years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after  December 15,  2013. Early adoption is
permitted. The Company has not yet  evaluated  the impact of the update on  its  financial statements.

Effects of Inflation and Pricing

Inflation in the United States has been relatively low in  recent  years  and  did  not  have a material
impact on our results of operations for the periods ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. Although
the impact of inflation has been insignificant in  recent years, it is still a factor in the  United States
economy  and we tend to experience inflationary pressure on  the cost of oilfield services and equipment
as increasing oil and gas prices increase  drilling activity in  our areas of operations. Material  changes in

74

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

prices also impact  the current revenue  stream,  estimates of  future reserves, borrowing base calculations,
depletion expense, impairment assessments  of oil and gas properties, and values  of properties in
purchase and sale transactions. Material  changes in prices can impact the value of oil and  gas
companies and their ability to raise capital, borrow money and  retain personnel.  While  we do not
currently expect business costs to materially increase,  higher  prices for  oil and natural  gas could result
in increases in the costs of materials, services and personnel.

Off-balance sheet arrangements

Currently, we do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market  Risks.

Oil and Natural Gas Price Risk

Our financial condition, results of operations and capital resources  are highly dependent  upon the
prevailing market prices of oil and natural  gas. These commodity prices  are subject to wide  fluctuations
and market uncertainties due to a variety of  factors that are beyond  our control. Factors influencing oil
and natural gas prices include the level of global  demand for oil, the  global supply of  oil and natural
gas, the establishment of and compliance  with production quotas by  oil exporting countries, weather
conditions which determine the demand  for  natural gas, the price  and availability of alternative fuels
and overall economic conditions. It is  impossible to predict  future oil and natural gas prices with any
degree of certainty. Sustained weakness  in oil and natural gas prices may  adversely affect our financial
condition and results of operations, and may also reduce the  amount  of oil and natural  gas reserves
that we can produce economically. Any  reduction in  our  oil and natural gas reserves, including
reductions due to price fluctuations,  can have an  adverse  effect on  our ability to obtain capital for our
exploration and development activities.  Similarly, any improvements in oil and natural gas prices  can
have a favorable impact on our financial condition, results  of  operations and capital  resources.  If oil
and natural gas prices declined by 10%  per  Bbl and  Mcf, then our  PV-10 as  of  December 31, 2013
would have been lower by approximately 20% or $242.6 million. A 10% decrease in pricing for our
proved undeveloped reserves would result in  a reduction  of 223 MBoe, a 0.6% change.

Commodity  Derivative  Contracts

Our primary commodity risk management objective is to reduce volatility in  our cash flows. We

enter into derivative contracts for oil and natural gas using NYMEX  futures or  over-the-counter
derivative financial instruments with only  well-capitalized counterparties which have been approved  by
our  board of directors.

The use of financial instruments may expose  us  to  the risk of financial loss in certain

circumstances, including instances when  (1) sales volumes are less  than expected requiring market
purchases to meet commitments, or (2) our  counterparties fail to purchase the contracted  quantities of
natural gas or otherwise fail to perform. To the  extent that  we  engage  in derivative contracts, we may
be prevented from realizing the benefits  of favorable price changes in the physical market. However,  we
are similarly insulated against decreases  in such prices.

Presently, all of our derivative arrangements are  concentrated with five counterparties, all of  which

are lenders under our credit facility.  If these counterparties fail to perform their obligations, we  may
suffer financial loss or be prevented from  realizing  the benefits of favorable price changes in the
physical  market.

The result of oil market prices exceeding our swap prices or collar ceilings requires  us to make
payment for the settlement of our derivatives, if owed by us, generally up to 15 business days  before we

75

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

receive market price cash payments from our customers. This could  have a material adverse effect  on
our  cash flows for the period between derivative settlement  and payment for revenues  earned.

Please refer to the Derivative  Activities  section  of  Item 1, Part 1 of this Annual Report on

Form 10-K for summary derivative activity tables.

For the oil and natural gas derivatives outstanding at  December 31,  2013, a hypothetical upward or

downward shift of 10% per Bbl or MMBtu in  the NYMEX forward  curve as of December 31, 2013
would change our derivative gain (loss) by $42.7 million and $(34.1) million, respectively.

Interest Rates

At December 31, 2013 and through the filing  date of  this report,  we  had no outstanding

borrowings under our credit facility, which  is subject  to  floating market rates of interest. Borrowings
under our credit facility bear interest at a fluctuating  rate that is tied to an adjusted  base  rate or
LIBOR, at our option. Any increases in  these  interest rates  can have an adverse impact on our results
of operations and  cash flow. As of December 31, 2013  and  through the filing date  of  this  report, a 100
basis point change in interest rates would  not  change our  annualized interest expense.

Counterparty and Customer Credit Risk

In connection with our derivatives activity, we have exposure  to  financial institutions  in the form  of

derivative transactions. Five lenders under  our credit facility are currently counterparties on  our
derivative instruments currently in place and  have investment grade  credit ratings.  We expect that any
future derivative transactions we enter into will  be  with these or other lenders under our  credit facility
that will carry an investment grade credit rating.

We  are also subject to credit risk due to concentration of our  oil and  natural  gas receivables with
certain significant customers. Please refer  to  the section titled Principal  Customers under  Item 1, Part I
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further details  about  our significant customers. The inability
or failure of our significant customers  to meet their obligations to us  or their insolvency or  liquidation
may adversely affect our financial results. We review the credit rating, payment history and financial
resources of our customers, but we do  not require our customers to post  collateral.

Marketability of Our Production

The marketability of our production  from the Mid-Continent and Rocky  Mountain regions

depends in part upon the availability,  proximity and capacity of third-party refineries,  access to regional
trucking, pipeline and rail infrastructure, natural gas gathering  systems  and  processing  facilities.  We
deliver crude oil and natural gas produced from these areas through trucking services, pipelines  and
rail facilities that we do not own. The lack of  availability or capacity  on these systems  and facilities
could reduce the price offered for our  production or result in  the shut-in of producing wells or the
delay or discontinuance of development plans for properties.

A portion of our production may also be interrupted, or shut in, from time to time for numerous

other reasons, including as a result of accidents, field labor  issues or  strikes, or we might voluntarily
curtail production in response to market conditions. If a substantial  amount of our production  is
interrupted at the same time, it could adversely affect  our cash flow.

Currently, there are no natural gas pipeline  systems that service wells  in the North Park Basin,

which  is prospective for the Niobrara  shale. In addition, we are not aware  of  any plans to construct a
facility necessary to process natural gas  produced from this basin. If neither we nor a third party
constructs the required pipeline system  and  processing facility, we may not be able to fully  test or
develop our resources in the North Park Basin.

76

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary  Data.

Index to Financial Statements

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31,  2013 and  December  31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Statements of Operations  and  Comprehensive  Income for  the Years Ended

78
79

December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

80

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the  Years Ended December 31, 2013,  2012,

and 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows  for the  Years Ended December 31, 2013,  2012, and 2011 . .
Notes to the Consolidated Financial  Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

81
82
83

77

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED  PUBLIC  ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc.

We  have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc.

and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the  related  consolidated statements  of
operations and comprehensive income,  stockholders’ equity,  and cash flows for  each of the three  years
in the period ended December 31, 2013. These financial  statements are the  responsibility of the
Company’s management. Our responsibility  is to express  an opinion on these financial statements based
on our audits.

We  conducted our audits in accordance with the standards  of  the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those  standards require that we  plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether  the  financial  statements are free  of material misstatement.  An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence  supporting the amounts and disclosures  in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting  principles used  and significant
estimates made by management, as well as  evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable  basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly,  in all

material respects, the financial position of  Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the results of their operations  and their  cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December  31, 2013, in  conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting  principles.

We  have also audited, in accordance with the standards of  the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc.’s and subsidiaries’ internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established  in Internal  Control—
Integrated  Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring  Organizations of the Treadway
Commission in 1992, and our report dated February  28, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion  on the
effectiveness of Bonanza Creek Energy,  Inc.’s internal control over  financial reporting.

/s/ Hein & Associates LLP

Denver,  Colorado
February 28, 2014

78

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

As of December 31,

2013

2012

$ 180,581,580

$

4,267,667

Current assets:

ASSETS

Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts receivable:

Oil  and  gas sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Joint interest and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid  expenses and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventory of oilfield equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Derivative asset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

57,484,768
12,915,777
1,637,925
10,696,524
857,863

Total  current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

264,174,437

Property and  equipment  (successful efforts method), at cost

Proved  properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: accumulated  depreciation,  depletion and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,257,288,465
(224,848,470)

Total proved  properties, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unproved properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Wells in progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Natural gas plant, net of accumulated depreciation of $5,902,796 in 2013 and

1,032,439,995
45,081,638
110,847,961

38,600,436
5,484,620
3,031,815
1,740,934
2,178,064

55,303,536

811,000,239
(89,669,725)

721,330,514
72,928,364
75,031,806

$3,403,817 in 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

71,473,693

69,683,786

Other property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $2,822,245 in

2013 and $890,093 in 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Oil and gas properties held for sale, net of accumulated depreciation, depletion, and
amortization of $1,462,563 in 2013 and $1,178,751 in 2012 (note 3) . . . . . . . . . . .

7,405,862

4,199,702

360,265

582,388

Total  property  and  equipment,  net

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term derivative asset
Other noncurrent assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,267,609,414
292,691
13,858,579

943,756,560
—
3,429,711

Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,545,935,121

$1,002,489,807

Current liabilities:

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Accounts payable and accrued expenses  (note 5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Oil and gas revenue distribution payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Contractual obligation for land acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Derivative liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 121,664,750
36,240,879
11,999,877
5,320,030

$

72,850,272
12,552,655
11,999,877
5,200,202

Total  current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

175,225,536

102,603,006

Long-term liabilities:

Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Contractual obligation for land acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ad valorem  taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Derivative liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income taxes, net
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Asset retirement obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

508,846,591
22,033,057
18,867,710
1,202,971
152,680,892
11,050,032

158,000,000
33,271,631
11,179,370
1,208,106
110,376,606
7,333,584

Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

889,906,789

423,972,303

Commitments and contingencies (note 7)

Stockholders’ equity:

Preferred stock, $.001 par  value, 25,000,000  shares authorized, none outstanding . . .
Common stock, $.001 par value, 225,000,000 shares authorized, 40,285,919 and

40,115,536 issued and outstanding in 2013 and 2012, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additional  paid-in capital
Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—

—

40,286
527,752,211
128,235,835

40,116
519,425,356
59,052,032

Total  stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

656,028,332

578,517,504

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,545,935,121

$1,002,489,807

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these  consolidated financial statements

79

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

For the Years Ended December 31,

2013

2012

2011

Operating net revenues:

Oil and gas sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $421,860,102 $231,205,241 $105,723,993

Operating expenses:

47,770,702
Lease operating expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
27,202,553
Severance and ad valorem taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exploration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4,212,915
Depreciation, depletion and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140,175,796
Impairment of oil and gas properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
General and administrative (including $12,638,149, $4,482,611, and

30,695,192
13,673,814
10,714,918
66,201,942
611,355

18,252,963
5,918,566
876,971
28,014,077
623,039

$4,436,794, respectively, of stock compensation) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

55,503,282

31,404,970

17,612,943

Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 274,865,248

153,302,191

71,298,559

Income from operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146,994,854
Other income (expense):

77,903,050

34,425,434

Derivative gain (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(12,472,052)
(21,972,436)
(42,083)

924,305
(4,132,955)
(132,526)

(2,798,743)
(4,017,230)
(110,276)

Total other income (expense) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(34,486,571)

(3,341,176)

(6,926,249)

Income from continuing operations before  taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112,508,283
(247,936)
(42,678,544)

Current income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

74,561,874
(531,773)
(29,459,500)

27,499,185
—
(12,890,328)

Income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

69,581,803

44,570,601

14,608,857

Discontinued operations (Note 3)

Loss from operations associated with oil and gas properties  held for

sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sale of oil and gas properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax (expense) benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(644,430)
—
246,430

(926,671)
4,192,120
(1,313,473)

(3,609,764)
—
1,692,088

Income (loss) from discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(398,000)

1,951,976

(1,917,676)

Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 69,183,803 $ 46,522,577 $ 12,691,181

Comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 69,183,803 $ 46,522,577 $ 12,691,181

Basic and diluted income (loss) per share:(1)
Basic net income (loss) per common share:

From continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
From discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
From  net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $

1.73 $
(0.01) $
1.72 $

1.12 $
0.05 $
1.17 $

Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted net income (loss) per common  share:

39,337,121

39,051,739

From continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
From discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
From net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $

1.72 $
(0.01) $
1.71 $

1.12 $
0.05 $
1.17 $

Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

39,403,599

39,051,739

0.49
(0.06)
0.43
29,323,999

0.49
(0.06)
0.43
29,323,999

(1) The Company follows the two-class method when computing the basic and diluted income (loss) per share,

which allocates earnings between common shareholders and participating securities. Please refer to  Note 13—
Earnings per Share, for a detailed calculation.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these  consolidated financial statements

80

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Common  Stock

Shares

Amount

Class B
Shares

Additional
Paid-In
Capital

Accumulated
Deficit

Total

Balances, January 1, 2011 . . . . . . 29,122,521 $29,123

7,500 $356,513,012 $

(161,726) $356,380,409

Issuance of common stock to

directors for services . . . . . . . .

Issuance of Class B common

stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Forfeiture of Class B common

stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—

—

—

—

—

167,500

— 4,600

— (2,100)

—

—

—

—

—

167,500

—

—

Sale of common stock, net of
underwriting  discounts  and
offering costs of $14,121,680 . . 10,000,000

10,000

— 155,868,320

— 155,878,320

Exchange of Class B common

stock for issuance of restricted
common stock to officers and
employees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Restricted stock used for tax

withholdings . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock-based  compensation . . . . .
Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

437,787

438 (10,000)

—

—

438

(82,724)
—
—

(83)
—
—

— (1,405,105)
—
4,268,856
—

— (1,405,188)
4,268,856
—
12,691,181
— 12,691,181

Balances, December 31, 2011 . . . 39,477,584 $39,478

— $515,412,583 $ 12,529,455 $527,981,516

Restricted common stock issued .
Restricted common stock

736,780

736

forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(80,338)

(80)

Restricted stock used for tax

withholdings . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(18,490)

(18)

(466,886)

Offering costs related to sale of

common stock . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock-based  compensation . . . . .
Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(2,952)
4,482,611

46,522,577

736

(80)

(466,904)

(2,952)
4,482,611
46,522,577

Balances, December 31, 2012 . . . 40,115,536 $40,116

— $519,425,356 $ 59,052,032 $578,517,504

Restricted common stock issued,

net of excess income tax
benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Restricted common stock

310,439

310

127,830

forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(31,817)

(32)

Restricted stock used for tax

withholdings . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock-based  compensation . . . . .
Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(108,239)

(108)

(4,439,124)
12,638,149

69,183,803

128,140

(32)

(4,439,232)
12,638,149
69,183,803

Balances, December 31, 2013 . . . 40,285,919 $40,286

— $527,752,211 $128,235,835 $656,028,332

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial  statements

81

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the Years Ended December 31,

2013

2012

2011

Cash flows from operating activities:

Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 69,183,803 $ 46,522,577 $ 12,691,181
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities

Depreciation, depletion and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred  income  taxes
Impairment of oil and gas properties
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock-based  compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Abandoned lease and dry hole expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of deferred financing costs and debt premium . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accretion of contractual obligation for land acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sale of oil and gas properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Derivative (gain) loss
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Changes in current assets and liabilities:

Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid expenses and other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Excess income tax benefit from the vesting of stock  awards . . . . . . . . . . . .
Settlement of asset retirement obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

140,546,444
42,432,114
—
12,638,149
1,709,106
1,505,175
761,304
—
12,472,052
(7,115)

(26,315,489)
1,393,890
50,897,311
(127,830)
(73,358)

68,444,803
30,772,973
2,259,545
4,482,611
8,378,612
700,162
317,209
(4,192,120)
(924,305)
167,851

31,507,596
11,198,240
4,067,023
4,436,794
—
1,004,225
—
—
2,798,743
(40,368)

(20,737,512)
(1,163,799)
22,768,732
—
(161,787)

(11,712,123)
(1,164,953)
5,996,440
—
(155,558)

Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

307,015,556

157,635,552

60,627,240

Cash flows from investing activities:

Acquisition  of oil and gas properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exploration and development of oil and gas properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Natural gas plant capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payments of contractual obligations for land acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from note receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sale of properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decrease in restricted cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Derivative cash settlements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additions to property and equipment—non oil and gas

(13,797,175)
(417,835,859)
(5,201,717)
(11,999,877)
—
—
79,478
(11,329,849)
(5,138,312)

(13,920,184)
(281,326,110)
(15,787,631)
—
—
9,336,898
252,580
(725,382)
(3,106,758)

(1,809,657)
(134,183,772)
(22,687,197)
—
986,906
—
—
(3,024,136)
(1,208,755)

Net cash used in investing activities

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(465,223,311)

(305,276,587)

(161,926,611)

Cash flows from financing activities:

Proceeds from credit facility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payments to credit facility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net share settlement from issuance of stock awards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sale of Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc. common stock . . . . . . . . . .
Net proceeds from Senior Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Premium on Senior Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Excess income tax benefit from the vesting of stock  awards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Offering costs related to sale of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred  financing  costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

102,000,000
(260,000,000)
(4,439,232)
—
488,278,341
9,000,000
127,830
—
(445,271)

151,400,000

(466,904)

108,100,000
— (156,900,000)
(1,405,188)
— 155,878,320
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(2,952)
(2,284,087)
(1,111,116)

Net cash provided by financing activities

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

334,521,668

149,819,028

103,389,045

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and  cash equivalents at beginning of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

176,313,913
4,267,667

2,177,993
2,089,674

2,089,674
—

Cash and  cash equivalents at end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 180,581,580 $

4,267,667 $

2,089,674

Supplemental  schedule of additional cash flow information and non-cash investing and financing activities:

2,914,095 $
Cash paid for interest
Cash paid for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
400,000 $
Contractual obligation for land acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 33,271,631 $ 45,271,508 $
Changes in working capital related to drilling expenditures  and  property

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 12,860,203 $
100,000 $

3,101,074
—
—

acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 29,272,661 $ 37,545,233 $

9,555,592

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these  consolidated financial statements

82

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING  POLICIES

Description of Operations

Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’ or ‘‘BCEI’’) is  engaged primarily in acquiring,
developing, exploiting and producing  oil and  gas properties. As of December 31, 2013,  the Company’s
assets and operations are concentrated primarily in  the Wattenberg Field in the Rocky Mountains and
in the Dorcheat Macedonia Field in Southern Arkansas.

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated balance sheet includes the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned

subsidiaries, Bonanza Creek Energy Operating Company, LLC,  Bonanza Creek  Energy
Resources, LLC, Bonanza Creek Energy  Upstream, LLC, Bonanza Creek Midstream, LLC and  Holmes
Eastern Company, LLC. All significant  intercompany  accounts  and transactions have been eliminated.
In connection with the preparation of the consolidated financial statements, the  Company evaluated
subsequent events after the balance sheet date of December 31, 2013, through the  filing date of this
report.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial  statements in conformity  with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management  to  make  estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts  of  oil and gas  reserves, assets and  liabilities,  and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at  the date of the balance sheet and  the reported amounts
of revenue and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could  differ  from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments  with original maturity  dates of three months
or less  to be cash equivalents. The carrying value and cash  and cash equivalents approximate  fair value
due to the short-term nature of these  instruments.

Accounts  Receivable

The Company’s accounts receivables are generated from oil and gas sales and  from joint  interest
owners on properties that the Company operates. The Company  accrues an allowance on a  receivable
when, based on the judgment of management, it is  probable that  a receivable  will not be collected and
the amount of any allowance may be reasonably estimated. For receivables from  joint interest owners,
the Company usually has the ability to withhold future  revenue  disbursements to satisfy the outstanding
balance. The Company’s oil and gas  receivables are typically collected within  one  to  two months and
the Company has experienced minimal bad debts.

Inventory of Oilfield Equipment

Inventory consists of material and supplies  used  in connection with the Company’s drilling
program. These inventories are stated at the lower  of  cost or market, which approximates  fair value.

83

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 1—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING  POLICIES (Continued)

Oil and Gas Producing Activities

The Company follows the successful efforts method of accounting for its oil  and gas exploration
and development costs. Under this method  of  accounting, all property acquisition costs and  costs of
exploratory and development wells will be capitalized at  cost when  incurred, pending determination of
whether economically recoverable reserves  have been  found. If an exploratory  well does not find
economically recoverable reserves, the costs of  drilling the well and other associated costs are charged
to dry hole expense. The costs of development wells are capitalized whether  the well is  productive or
nonproductive. Costs incurred to maintain wells  and  their  related equipment and leases  as well as
operating costs are charged to expense as  incurred. Geological and geophysical costs are expensed as
incurred.

Depletion, depreciation and amortization (‘‘DD&A’’) of capitalized costs of  proved oil and gas

properties are provided for on a field-by-field basis using the units-of-production method based upon
proved reserves. The computation of  DD&A  takes into  consideration the anticipated proceeds  from
equipment salvage and the Company’s  expected cost  to  abandon  its well interests.

The Company assesses its proved oil and  gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate that the carrying value  of the assets  may not be recoverable. The impairment
test compares undiscounted future net cash flows to the  assets net book value. If the net  capitalized
costs exceed future net cash flows, then  the cost  of the property  is written down to fair value. The
factors used to determine fair value are subject  to  the Company’s judgment and  expertise and include,
but are not limited to, recent sales prices of comparable properties, the  present  value of future cash
flows, net of estimated operating and development  costs using estimates of proved reserves, future
commodity pricing, future production estimates, anticipated capital expenditures, and various discount
rates commensurate with the risk and current market conditions associated with realizing the expected
cash flows projected.

For the year ended December 31, 2013,  the Company recorded no proved  property impairments

from continuing or discontinued operations. For  the years ended December 31, 2012  and 2011  the
Company recorded $611,000 and $623,000, respectively,  of  proved property impairments  from
continuing operations located in one of the Company’s non-core Southern Arkansas  fields  and
$1.6 million and $3.4 million of proved property  impairments from discontinued  operations located  in
the Company’s legacy California assets. The impairments  of the Company’s legacy assets in California
were related to steam flooding results  that were lower than expected and the impairment of  the
non-core field in Southern Arkansas was related to the loss of a lease.

The Company assesses its unproved properties periodically for impairment on a

property-by-property basis, which requires significant judgment.  The Company considers the following
factors in its assessment of the impairment of unproved properties:

• the remaining amount of unexpired term under leases;

• its  ability to actively manage and prioritize its capital expenditures to drill leases and to make

payments to extend leases that may be closer to expiration;

• its  ability to exchange lease positions with other companies that  allow for higher concentrations

of ownership and development;

84

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 1—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING  POLICIES (Continued)

• its  ability to convey partial mineral  ownership to other companies in  exchange for their drilling

of leases; and

• its  evaluation of the continuing successful results from the application of completion technology
in the Niobrara formation by the Company or by other operators in areas adjacent  to  or near its
unproved  properties.

The Company records the fair value of  a liability for  an asset  retirement obligation as an  asset and

a liability when there is a legal obligation  associated with the  retirement of a  long-lived asset  and the
amount can be reasonably estimated.  The  increase in  carrying value is  included in  proved properties in
the accompanying balance sheets. For  additional discussion, please  refer to Note 10—Asset Retirement
Obligations.

Gains and losses arising from sales of oil and gas properties  will be included in  income.  However,

a partial sale of proved properties within  an existing field that does  not significantly affect the
unit-of-production depletion rate will  be accounted  for as  a normal retirement with  no gain or  loss
recognized. The sale of a partial interest within a proved property  is accounted for as a  recovery of
cost. The partial sale of unproved property is accounted for as  a recovery  of  cost when there is
uncertainty of the ultimate recovery of the cost applicable to the interest  retained.

Natural Gas Plant

Natural gas plants are recorded at cost  and  depreciated using the straight-line method over a
30 year useful life. The Company assesses the facilities for impairment when events  or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable and an impairment  loss is
recorded  as necessary.

Other Property and Equipment

Other property and equipment such as  office furniture and equipment, buildings, and computer

hardware and software are recorded at  cost. Cost  of  renewals and improvements that substantially
extend the useful lives of the assets are  capitalized.  Maintenance  and repair costs  are expensed as
incurred. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method  over the  estimated  useful lives  of the
assets, which range from three to ten  years.

Assets Held for Sale

Any properties deemed held for sale as of  the balance sheet date are presented separately on  the

accompanying balance sheets at the lower  of net book value or fair value less cost to sell.  The
Company currently has its legacy California  assets as  held  for sale,  which is shown within the
discontinued operation section of the accompanying statement of operations and within
Note  3—Discontinued Operations.

Revenue Recognition

The Company records revenues from the sales of crude oil  and  natural gas  when delivery  to  the

customer has occurred and title has transferred, net of royalties, discounts, and allowances, as
applicable. Payment is generally received within 30 to 90  days after  the  date of production. This occurs
when oil or gas has been delivered to a  pipeline or a tank lifting has occurred.  The Company presents

85

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 1—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING  POLICIES (Continued)

production taxes separately within the accompanying  statements of operations and  comprehensive
income within the severance and ad valorem taxes  line item. At the end  of  each  month the Company
estimates the amount of production delivered  to  the purchaser and  the  price the Company will  receive.
The Company factors in historical performance, quality and  transportation differentials, commodity
prices, and other factors when deriving  revenue estimates. The  Company has interests with other
producers in certain properties in which  case the  Company uses the entitlement method to account for
gas imbalances. The Company had no  gas imbalances as of December 31, 2013,  2012, and 2011.

For gathering and processing services, the  Company either receives fees or commodities from
natural gas producers depending on the type of contract. Under the percentage-of-proceeds contract
type, the Company is paid for its services by keeping  a percentage of the NGL produced  and a
percentage of the residue gas resulting from processing the natural gas. Commodities received are, in
turn, sold and recognized as revenue in accordance with  the criteria  outlined above.

Income  Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under  the liability method,  which requires recognition of

deferred tax assets and liabilities for  the expected future tax consequences of events that have been
included in the balance sheet or tax  returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are
determined based on the difference between the financial  statements and tax basis  of assets and
liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect  for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.

Uncertain Tax Positions

The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax  positions in income tax
expense. The tax returns for 2012, 2011, and 2010 are  still subject  to  audit by the  Internal Revenue
Service. There were no uncertain tax positions.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

The Company has maintained cash balances in excess of the  Federal Deposit  Insurance

Corporation (FDIC) insured limit.

The Company is exposed to credit risk in the  event of nonpayment by counterparties whose
creditworthiness is continuously evaluated. For  the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011
Lion Oil Trading & Transportation, Inc.  accounted for 23%, 32%, and 35%,  respectively, while Plains
Marketing LP accounted for 37%, 50%, and  45%, respectively, of oil and natural gas sales. For the
year ended December 31, 2013, High Sierra  Crude  Oil & Marketing accounted for 15% of  oil and
natural gas sales and an immaterial amount for the years ended December 31,  2012 and  2011.

Oil and Gas Derivative Activities

The Company is exposed to commodity price risk related to  oil  and gas prices. To mitigate this
risk, the Company enters into oil and  gas forward contracts. The contracts, which  are generally placed
with major financial institutions or with counterparties which management  believes to be of high  credit
quality, may take the form of futures contracts,  swaps, options, or  collars. The oil  contracts are indexed
to NYMEX WTI prices, and natural gas contracts are indexed to NYMEX HH prices,  which have a
high degree of historical correlation  with actual  prices received by  the Company.  The Company

86

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 1—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING  POLICIES (Continued)

recognizes all derivative instruments  on  the balance  sheet as either assets  or liabilities at  fair value. For
additional discussion, please refer to Note 12—Derivatives.

Earnings Per Share

Earnings per basic and diluted share  are calculated  under the  two-class  method. Pursuant to the

two-class method, the Company’s unvested restricted  stock  awards with  non-forfeitable rights  to
dividends are considered participating  securities. Under the two-class method,  earnings per basic share
is calculated by dividing net income available to shareholders  by the  weighted-average number of
common shares outstanding during the period. The two-class method includes an earnings allocation
formula that determines earnings per  share  for each  participating  security according  to  undistributed
earnings for the period. Net income available to shareholders is reduced by the  amount  allocated  to
participating restricted shares to arrive at the earnings allocated to common stock shareholders for
purposes  of calculating earnings per  share. Earnings per diluted  share is  computed on  the basis of  the
weighted-average number of common  shares outstanding during the period plus the  dilutive effect  of
any potential common shares outstanding during the period using the more  dilutive of the  treasury
method or two-class method. For additional discussion, please refer to Note 13—Earnings Per Share.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company measures the cost of employee  services received in exchange for an award of equity

instruments based on the grant-date fair  value of  the award. For additional discussion,  please refer  to
Note  8—Stock-Based Compensation.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables,  trade

payables, accrued liabilities, a revolving  credit facility, senior notes,  and derivative instruments. Cash
and cash equivalents, trade receivables,  trade payables  and  accrued  liabilities are carried at cost and
approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these  instruments.  Our revolving credit  facility
has a variable interest rate so it approximates fair value.  Our senior notes are recorded at cost,  and the
fair value is disclosed within Note 11—Fair Value Measurements. Derivative instruments are recorded at
fair value. The book value of the contractual obligation  for  land acquisition approximates fair value due
to it being discounted at a market based interest rate.

Prior  Year Reclassifications

Certain predecessor balances have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation,

and such reclassifications had no impact on net  income or stockholders’  equity previously reported.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In July 2013, the FASB issued Update No.  2013-11—Income Taxes (Topic  740): Presentation of an
Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating  Loss Carryforward,  a Similar Tax  Loss, or a  Tax Credit
Carryforward Exists (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). The update provides
clarification on the presentation of an unrecognized tax  benefit when a net operating loss  carryforward,
a similar tax loss or a tax credit carryforward  exists. The update is  effective for  public entities  for fiscal

87

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 1—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING  POLICIES (Continued)

years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after  December 15,  2013. Early adoption is
permitted. The Company has not yet  evaluated  the impact of the update on  its  financial statements.

NOTE  2—ACQUISITIONS

The Company did not complete any material  acquisitions  during the year ended December 31,

2013.

On July 31, 2012, the Company acquired leases to approximately 5,600  net acres  in the Wattenberg

Field from the State of Colorado, State  Board of Land Commissioners.  The Company paid
approximately $12 million at closing, $12  million  on July 31, 2013, and  will pay  approximately
$12 million on July 31st of each of the  next three years. These future  payments were discounted based
on our effective borrowing rate to arrive at the purchase price  of  $57 million. These future payments
are secured by a $36 million letter of  credit  as of December 31, 2013  and  interest  will be imputed on
the future payments. Following each  payment the amount secured  by the letter  of credit  will be
amended each year on July 31st to reflect the reduction in obligation.

NOTE  3—DISCONTINUED  OPERATIONS

During June of 2012, the Company began marketing, with the  intent to sell, all of its oil and gas

properties in California classifying them as assets held for  sale. Assets are  classified as held for sale
when the Company commits to a plan to sell the assets and there is  reasonable certainty that the sale
will take place within one year. The Company determined  that its intent to sell  all  of its  assets in  a
region  qualified as discontinued operations.  The  Company sold a majority of the properties  for
approximately $9.3 million and recorded a gain on the sale of oil and  gas properties in  the amount of
$4.2 million during 2012. The carrying  amounts of the  remaining  properties included  within assets  held
for sale classified as discontinued operations are  presented below.

As of December 31,

2013

2012

Assets held for sale:

Oil and gas properties, successful efforts method:

Proved properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unproved  properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Wells in progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 1,721,265
629
100,934

$ 1,721,265
629
39,245

Total property and equipment

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,822,828

1,761,139

Less accumulated depletion, depreciation,  and

amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(1,462,563)

(1,178,751)

Net property and equipment

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

360,265

$

582,388

88

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE  3—DISCONTINUED  OPERATIONS  (Continued)

The current assets and liabilities related to these properties are immaterial. The  total  revenues,

expenses, and income associated with the operation of the  oil and  gas properties  held for  sale as
discontinued operations are presented  below.

For the Years Ended December 31,

2013

2012

2011

Net revenues:

Oil and gas sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,667,645

$5,410,806

$ 6,739,479

Operating  expenses:

Lease operating expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Severance and ad valorem taxes . . . . . . . .
Exploration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation, depletion and amortization .
Impairment of proved properties . . . . . . . .

1,870,457
5,433
65,537
370,648

2,279,844
127,041
39,541
2,242,861
— 1,648,190

3,234,575
169,705
7,460
3,493,519
3,443,984

Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,312,075

6,337,477

10,349,243

(Loss) from operations associated with

properties held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ (644,430) $ (926,671)

(3,609,764)

NOTE  4—OTHER  ASSETS

The Company has multiple certificates of deposit  at three financial institutions  to  meet financial

bonding requirements in the states of  Colorado,  Wyoming, and California.

The Company has unamortized deferred  financing costs related to the bank revolving credit

agreement and Senior Note issuance.

Certificates of deposit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred  financing  costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

165,653
13,692,926

$ 245,131
3,184,580

$13,858,579

$3,429,711

As of December 31,

2013

2012

89

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 5—ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND  ACCRUED  EXPENSES

Accounts payable and accrued expenses  contain the following:

As of December 31,

2013

2012

Drilling and completion costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts payable trade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued general and administrative cost . . . . . . . . . . . .
Lease operating expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued reclamation cost
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued  oil  and  gas  derivatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Production and ad valorem taxes and other . . . . . . . . .

$ 80,971,343
3,287,897
12,719,821
5,440,000
167,704
7,065,250
446,047
11,566,688

$51,698,682
10,049,131
5,078,059
2,824,300
400,000
219,494
238,365
2,342,241

$121,664,750

$72,850,272

NOTE 6—LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt consisted of the following  as of December 31, 2013  and 2012:

Revolving credit facility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.75% Senior Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unamortized premium on 6.75% Senior Notes . . . . . .

$

500,000,000
8,846,591

— $158,000,000
—
—

$508,846,591

$158,000,000

As of December 31,

2013

2012

Revolving Credit Facility

The Revolver, dated March 29, 2011, as amended, with  a syndication of  banks, including KeyBank

National Association as the administrative agent and issuing lender, provides for  borrowings of up to
$600 million. The Revolver provides  for  interest rates plus  an  applicable  margin to be determined
based on LIBOR or a Base Rate, at  the Company’s election.  LIBOR  borrowings  bear interest at
LIBOR plus 1.75% to 2.75% depending on the utilization  level, and the Base Rate borrowings bear
interest at the ‘‘Bank Prime Rate,’’ as defined in  the Revolver, plus  .75%  to  1.75%.

On November 6, 2013 the borrowing  base  under the  Revolver  was  determined to be $450 million,

an increase from $330 million. Pursuant to the  corresponding amendment, the Company  elected  to
limit bank commitments at $330 million while reserving the  option to access, at the Company’s request,
the full $450 million prior to the next  semi-annual redetermination. The borrowing base is
re-determined semiannually on May 15  and  November 15 and may be re-determined  up to one
additional time between such scheduled determinations upon  request by  the Company or  lenders
holding  662⁄3% of the aggregate commitments. A letter of credit  that was issued  to  the Colorado  State
Board of Land Commissioners in connection  with the Company’s lease of acreage in the Wattenberg
Field reduces the borrowing base under  the Revolver  and is  paid  in equal  $12 million increments over
the next three years. Commitment fees  on the Revolver range  from 0.375% to 0.50%,  depending  on
utilization. The Revolver restricts, among other items,  the payment  of dividends,  certain additional

90

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 6—LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued)

indebtedness, sale of assets, loans and  certain investments  and mergers.  The  Revolver  also contains
certain  financial  covenants,  which  require  the  maintenance  of  a  minimum  current  and  debt  coverage
ratio, as defined by the Revolver. The Company was  in compliance  with all financial and non-financial
covenants as of December 31, 2013 and  through the  filing  date of  this report.  The  Revolver  is
collateralized by substantially all the Company’s assets and matures on  September 15, 2017. As of
December 31, 2013, the Company had  no outstanding  balance under the  Revolver  with an available
borrowing capacity of $414 million after the reduction for  the outstanding letter of credit of
$36 million. As of December 31, 2012, the Company had  $158 million outstanding under the Revolver
with $119 million available borrowing  capacity  after the reduction of the  outstanding letter  of credit  of
$48 million.

Senior Notes

On April 9, 2013, the Company issued $300  million aggregate principal amount of 6.75% Senior

Notes that mature on April 15, 2021.  Interest  on the Senior Notes began accruing  on April 9, 2013,
and the Company will pay interest on  April 15 and October 15 of  each year,  which began on
October 15, 2013. On November 15, 2013, BCEI issued an  additional $200  million aggregate  principal
amount of 6.75% Senior Notes as an additional issuance  of our  existing Senior Notes that mature on
April 15, 2021. The Senior Notes are guaranteed on  a senior unsecured basis  by  the Company’s existing
and future subsidiaries that incur or  guarantee certain  indebtedness, including indebtedness under the
Company’s Revolver. The net proceeds  from  the sale  of  the Senior  Notes were $497.3 million after the
premium and deduction of $11.7 million of expenses  and underwriting discounts  and commissions.  The
net proceeds were used to pay off the Company’s outstanding credit  facility  balance  and for general
corporate purposes.

At any time prior to April 15, 2016, the Company  may redeem  up to 35% of the  aggregate
principal amount at a redemption price  of 106.75%  of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid
interest. The Company may redeem all or a  part of  the Senior Notes at any time prior to April 15,
2017 at the redemption price equal to  100% of the principal amount, plus the applicable ‘‘make-whole’’
premium and accrued and unpaid interest.  On or  after April 15, 2017, the Company may redeem  all  or
a part of the Senior Notes at the redemption price  of  103.375% for 2017, 101.688%  for 2018, and
100.0% for 2019 and thereafter, during  the twelve month period beginning on  April 15  of  each
applicable year, plus accrued and unpaid  interest.

The Company filed a Registration Statement on  Form S-4 with the SEC, which became effective
June 3, 2013 and registered the offering to exchange unregistered Senior  Notes for registered Senior
Notes, as well as the guarantees of the  Senior  Notes by the Company’s subsidiaries. On November 12,
2013, the Company filed a registration statement on  Form S-3 with the SEC, which allows for
automatic registration for well-known seasoned  issuers. As of December 31, 2013, all of the  existing
subsidiaries of the Company are guarantors of the Senior Notes, and all such  subsidiaries  are 100%
owned by the Company. The guarantees by  the subsidiaries are full and unconditional (except for
customary release  provisions) and constitute joint and several obligations of the subsidiaries. The
Company has no independent assets  or  operations unrelated to its  investments in its consolidated
subsidiaries. There are no significant restrictions on the  Company’s ability or the  ability of any
subsidiary guarantor to obtain funds from  its  subsidiaries by such means as  a dividend  or loan.

91

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE  7—COMMITMENTS  AND  CONTINGENT  LIABILITIES

Contingent  Liabilities

From time to time, the Company is  involved  in various commercial  and regulatory claims, litigation

and other legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of its business.  The Company assesses
these claims in an effort to determine  the degree of probability and  range of possible loss  for potential
accrual  in its consolidated financial statements. In accordance with accounting authoritative guidance,
an accrual is recorded for a loss contingency when its occurrence  is probable and damages can  be
reasonably estimated based on the anticipated most  likely outcome or the minimum  amount  within a
range of possible outcomes. Because legal proceedings are  inherently unpredictable  and unfavorable
resolutions could occur, assessing contingencies  is highly subjective and  requires judgments about
uncertain future events. When evaluating contingencies,  the Company may  be  unable to provide a
meaningful estimate due to a number  of  factors, including the procedural  status of  the matter in
question, the presence of complex or  novel legal  theories, and/or the ongoing discovery and
development of information important  to the matters. The Company regularly  reviews contingencies to
determine the adequacy of its accruals  and related disclosures.  No claims have been made,  nor is the
Company aware of any material uninsured liability which the Company  may have, as  it relates  to  any
environmental cleanup, restoration or  the violation of any rules or regulations. As of the date of this
filing, there were no material pending or overtly  threatened  legal actions  against the Company  of which
it is aware.

Commitments

The Company rents office facilities under  various non-cancelable operating  lease agreements. The

annual minimum payments for the next  five years and  total minimum lease  payments thereafter  are
presented  below:

2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2018 and thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Office Leases

$ 2,349,477
2,359,221
2,373,367
2,438,465
7,350,522

$16,871,052

The Company’s office leases extend through 2021. Rent expense for the years ended December 31

2013, 2012, and 2011 was $1.4 million, $886,000, and $487,000, respectively

NOTE 8—STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Management  Incentive  Plan

On December 23, 2010, the Company established  the Management Incentive Plan (the ‘‘Plan’’) for

the benefit of certain employees, officers  and  other  individuals performing services for the Company.
The maximum number of shares of Class B common stock available  under the Plan was 10,000  and
these shares were converted into 437,787  shares of our restricted common stock upon completion of
the Company’s initial public offering.  The conversion rate was determined based on a  formula factoring
in the rate of return to the pre-IPO common stockholders. The 437,787  shares of common  stock  that

92

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 8—STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION  (Continued)

were granted were valued at the IPO stated  price of $17.00 per share and vest over a three-year period.
Stock-based compensation expense of  $2.5 million, $2.5 million, and $122,000 was recorded  during the
years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.  As of December 31,  2013 there was
$2.3 million of unrecognized compensation  costs related  to the unvested restricted common stock
granted under the plan, which is to be amortized through  2014.

BCEC Investment Trust

The BCEC Investment Trust was formed to hold shares of our common stock received by Bonanza

Creek Energy Company, LLC, our predecessor, in connection with our  December 23,  2010 corporate
restructuring. On February 5, 2013, 13,825  previously issued shares of our common stock  that  were fully
vested and held by the BCEC Investment  Trust  were distributed to former employees.  While  the shares
had been issued in December 2010, for  accounting purposes, the  date of  distribution  to  former
employees was considered the grant  date, and these shares were  valued  at the  closing  price of our
common stock on the grant date, which  was  $34.18 per share.  On February 11, 2013,  59,372 previously
issued shares of our common stock that were fully  vested  and  held by  the BCEC Investment Trust were
distributed to certain current employees. While the shares had been issued in December  2010, for
accounting purposes, the date of distribution to employees was considered the  grant date, and these
shares were valued at the closing price  of our common stock on  the grant date, which was  $34.89 per
share. These distributions resulted in a stock-based  compensation  expense of $2.5  million for the year
ended December 31, 2013.

BCEC Management Incentive Plan

In connection with the corporate restructuring, 317,142 shares of  common stock of BCEI were
designated for holders of Bonanza Creek Energy, LLC’s,  our predecessor, Class B  units. These shares
were held in trust for the benefit of employees. On December 15, 2011,  243,945 of these shares were
valued  at $17.00 per share and granted  to  employees without vesting  requirements and the Company
recorded  a stock-based compensation  charge in the  amount  of  $4,147,000.

Long Term Incentive Plan

The Company’s 2011 Long Term Incentive Plan has different forms  of  equity issuances allowed

under it as further described in this section.

Restricted Stock under the Long Term  Incentive Plan

The Company grants shares of restricted stock to directors, eligible employees  and officers  as a
part of its equity incentive plan. Restrictions and vesting periods for the awards are  determined by the
Compensation Committee of the Board  of Directors  and are  set forth in the award agreements. Each
share of restricted stock represents one share of the  Company’s common stock to be released from
restrictions upon completion of the vesting  period. The awards  typically vest  in one-third increments
over three years. Each share of restricted stock  is entitled  to  a  non-forfeitable dividend, if the Company
were to declare one, and has the same  voting  rights as a share  of common stock. Shares of restricted
stock are valued at the closing price of  the Company’s common stock on  the grant date and  are
recognized as general and administrative expense over the vesting period  of the award.

93

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 8—STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION  (Continued)

During 2013, the Company granted 292,396 shares of restricted  stock  under the  LTIP to certain
employees. The fair value of the issuance was $12.4 million. The  Company recognized compensation
expense of $2.6 million for the year ended December  31, 2013. As of December 31, 2013 unrecognized
compensation cost was $9.6 million and will be amortized through 2016.

During 2012, the Company granted 697,500 shares of restricted  common  stock under the  LTIP to

certain employees. The fair value of  the issuance was  $11.8  million.  The Company recognized
compensation expense of $4.3 million  and  $1.7 million  for  the years ended December 31, 2013  and
2012, respectively. As of December 31,  2013 unrecognized  compensation cost was $5.3 million and will
be amortized through 2015.

In 2013 and 2012,  the Company issued 18,043 and 33,534 shares, respectively,  of restricted
common stock under the LTIP to its non-employee directors.  The Company recognized compensation
expense of $445,000 and $267,000 for  the years ended December 31, 2013 and  2012, respectively.  These
awards vest approximately one year after issuance.

A summary of the status and activity  of non-vested  restricted stock is  presented  below:

For the Years Ended December 31,

2013

2012

2011

Non-vested at beginning of year . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Restricted
Stock

929,336
310,439
(371,956)
(31,817)

Non-vested at end of year . . . . . . .

836,002

Weighted-
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value

$17.06
$39.89
$17.44
$24.09

$25.11

Restricted
Stock

437,787
731,034
(159,147)
(80,338)

929,336

Weighted-
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value

Weighted-
Average

Restricted Grant-Date
Fair Value

Stock

$17.00
$16.98
$17.11
$15.89

$17.06

437,787

— $ —
$17.00
— $ —
— $ —

437,787

$17.00

Cash flows resulting from excess tax  benefits  are to be classified as part of  cash flows from
financing activities. Excess tax benefits are realized tax  benefits from tax deductions for  vested
restricted stock in excess of the deferred tax  asset attributable to stock compensation  costs for such
restricted stock. The Company recorded $127,830 for the  year ended December  31, 2013 as cash
inflows from financing activities. The  Company recorded no excess tax benefits  for the  years  ended
December 31, 2012 and 2011.

Performance Stock Units under the Long  Term Incentive Plan

The Company grants performance stock units (‘‘PSUs’’) to certain officers  as part of its LTIP. The
number of shares of the Company’s common stock  that may be issued  to  settle PSUs  ranges from zero
to two times the number of PSUs awarded and is determined based on the Company’s  performance
over a three-year measurement period. The performance criterion for the PSUs is  based on  a
comparison of the Company’s Total Shareholder Return  (‘‘TSR’’) for the measurement period
compared with the TSRs of a group of peer companies for the measurement period.  Expense
associated with PSUs is recognized as  general  and  administrative expense  over the measurement
period. The PSUs vest in their entirety  at the  end of the measurement period.

94

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 8—STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION  (Continued)

The fair value of the PSUs was measured at  the grant date with a stochastic process method using
the GBM Model. A stochastic process  is  a mathematically defined equation that can create a series  of
outcomes over time. These outcomes  are  not  deterministic  in nature, which means that by iterating the
equations multiple times, different results will  be  obtained for those iterations.  In  the case of the
Company’s PSUs, the Company cannot  predict with certainty the path its stock price or  the stock prices
of its peers will take over the three-year performance period.  By  using  a stochastic simulation, the
Company can create multiple prospective  stock pathways, statistically analyze these  simulations, and
ultimately make inferences regarding  the most likely path the stock  price will take.  As such,  because
future stock prices are stochastic, or  probabilistic with some direction in nature,  the stochastic method,
specifically the GBM Model, is deemed  an  appropriate method by which  to  determine the  fair value of
the PSUs. Significant assumptions used in  this  simulation include the Company’s  expected volatility,
risk-free interest rate based on U.S. Treasury yield curve rates  with maturities consistent with a three
year measurement period, as well as the volatilities for each of the Company’s peers.

During 2013, the Company granted 41,622 PSUs under the  LTIP to certain  officers. The Company

recognized compensation expense of $340,000  for  the year  ended December 31, 2013.  As of
December 31, 2013, unrecognized compensation  expense for PSUs was  $1 million and  is being
amortized through 2015. The fair value of the PSUs  granted  in 2013  was  $1.2 million.

A summary of the status and activity  of PSUs is presented  in the following table:

For the Year Ended
December 31, 2013

Non-vested at beginning of year(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vested(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forfeited(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

PSU

—
41,622
—
(1,431)

Non-vested at end of year(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

40,191

Weighted-Average
Grant-Date Fair Value

$ —
$32.01
$ —
$30.85

$32.05

(1) The number of awards assumes a one  multiplier.  The final number  of  shares of common
stock issued may vary depending on  the ending three-year performance  multiplier, which
ranges from zero to two.

401(k)  Plan

The Company has a defined contribution pension plan  (the  ‘‘401(k) Plan’’)  that  is subject to the

Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The 401(k) Plan  allows eligible employees  to
contribute up to the contribution limits  established under  the IRC. The Company  matches each
employee’s contribution up to six percent of the employee’s base salary. The Company’s matching
contributions to the 401(k) Plan were  $837,000, $589,000,  and $296,000 for the  years  ended
December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011,  respectively.

95

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE  9—INCOME  TAXES

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured by applying  the provisions  of enacted tax laws to

determine the amount of taxes payable  or refundable currently  or in  future years related to cumulative
temporary differences between the tax  bases of assets and liabilities and  amounts reported in  the
Company’s balance sheet. The tax effect of the  net change in  the cumulative temporary  differences
during each period in the deferred tax assets and liabilities determines the periodic provision for
deferred taxes. The provision for income  taxes consists  of  the following:

For the Years Ended December 31,

2013

2012

2011

Current tax expense

Federal
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

121,926
126,010
42,432,114

$

288,659
243,114
30,772,973

$

—
—
11,198,240

Total income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . .

$42,680,050

$31,304,746

$11,198,240

Temporary differences between the financial statement carrying  amounts and  tax bases of  assets

and liabilities that give rise to the net deferred tax liability result from the following components:

As of December 31,

2013

2012

Deferred tax liabilities:

Oil and gas properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$195,775,731

$132,932,511

Total deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

195,775,731

132,932,511

Deferred tax assets:

Federal and state tax net operating loss carryforward
Reclamation costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Derivative  liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
AMT credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State bonus depreciation addback . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

31,289,282
4,310,643
2,617,119
1,832,642
776,197
1,937,672
331,284

16,061,072
2,981,012
777,069
1,398,054
446,683
791,793
100,222

Total deferred tax assets

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

43,094,839

22,555,905

Total non-current net deferred tax liability . . . . . . . .

$152,680,892

$110,376,606

The Company has $95,053,000 and $43,806,000 of net  operating loss carryovers for federal income

tax purposes of which $9,311,000 and $444,000 is  not  recorded as a benefit for financial  statement
purposes  as it relates to tax deductions that are  different  from  the stock-based compensation expense
recorded  for financial statement purposes as  of  December  31, 2013 and 2012,  respectively. The benefit
of these  excess tax deductions will not  be recognized  for financial statement  purposes until  the related
deductions reduce taxes payable.

96

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 9—INCOME TAXES (Continued)

Federal income tax expense differs from  the amount that would be provided by applying  the

statutory United States federal income  tax  rate to income before  income  taxes  primarily  due  to  the
effect of state income taxes, rate changes, and other permanent  differences, as  follows:

Federal statutory tax expense . . . . . . . . . .
Increase (decrease) in tax resulting from:

For the Years Ended December 31,

2013

2012

2011

39,152,349

27,173,985

8,122,403

State tax expense net of federal benefit .
Rate change and other . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,833,606
(305,905)

2,753,365
1,377,396

950,926
2,124,911

Total income tax expense . . . . . . . . . .

$42,680,050

$31,304,746

$11,198,240

Reconciliation of the Company’s effective tax rate  to  the expected  federal  tax rate of 35%,  35%,

and 34% in 2013, 2012, and 2011 is as follows:

For the Years Ended
December  31,

2013

2012

2011

34%
35%
Expected federal tax rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.43% 3.55% 3.98%
Change in tax rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (cid:4)0.28% 1.67% 8.90%
38.15% 40.22% 46.88%
Effective tax rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

35%

During the year ended December 31, 2013  the decrease in  tax  rate was primarily due to a  decrease

in taxable income apportioned to California and Arkansas  and an increase in  taxable income
apportioned to Colorado. The decrease  in the effective  tax rate with the change in  tax rate was applied
to the January 1, 2013 deferred income  tax  liability  resulting in a decrease to the net  deferred tax
liability and deferred income tax expense of  $400,000. The total deferred income tax  expense in  our
consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income is  $42.4 million.

During the year ended December 31, 2012,  the estimated effective tax rate was revised to reflect a

35% rate for federal income taxes. The  Company  believed  that this  rate more appropriately reflected
the federal  rate on future earnings. The increase in  the effective tax rate with the  change in tax rate
was applied to the January 1, 2012 deferred income tax  liability  resulting in  an increase to the net
deferred tax liability and deferred income tax expense  of $1.2 million with an additional  $29.6 million
applicable to federal and state income taxes for the year ended December 31,  2012, which together
resulted in a total deferred income tax expense in our consolidated statements of  operations and
comprehensive income of $30.8 million.

During the year ended December 31, 2011,  the estimated tax rate was  revised to reflect significant

capital expenditures in Arkansas and  the effective tax rate increased  from 36.87% to 37.98%. The
increase in the effective tax rate was  applied to the January 1,  2011 deferred income tax  liability
resulting in an increase to the net deferred tax liability and deferred income tax  expense of $2.1 million
with an additional  $9.1 million incurred for federal and state income taxes  for the  year  ended
December 31, 2011, which together resulted in  a total deferred  income  tax  expense in  our  consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive income of $11.2 million.

The Company had no unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2013,  2012, and  2011.

97

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 10—ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS

The Company recognizes an estimated liability for future costs to abandon its oil  and gas
properties. The fair value of the asset retirement obligation is recorded as a liability when incurred,
which  is typically at the time the asset is  acquired or  placed  in service. There is a corresponding
increase to the carrying value of the  asset  which is included in  the proved properties  line item in the
accompanying balance sheets. The Company depletes the amount added to proved  properties and
recognizes expense in connection with accretion of the  discounted liability over the  remaining  estimated
economic lives of the properties.

The Company’s estimated asset retirement obligation liability is based on historical  experience in

abandoning wells, estimated economic lives, estimated costs to abandon the wells,  and regulatory
requirements. The liability is discounted using the  credit-adjusted risk-free rate estimated at the time
the liability is incurred and has been  set  at  8%. Revisions to the  liability  could  occur due to changes in
the estimated economic lives and abandonment costs  of the wells  along with  newly  enacted regulatory
requirements. The revisions to estimate  for the year ended December 31, 2013  is comprised of
increased abandonment cost on wells  that had an asset retirement  obligation as of the  beginning  of  the
year.

As of December 31,

2013

2012

Beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additional liabilities incurred . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accretion expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Obligations on properties sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Liabilities  settled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Revisions to estimate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 7,333,584
1,066,822
645,360
—
(73,358)
2,077,624

$6,039,723
1,448,063
519,315
(511,730)
(161,787)
—

End of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$11,050,032

$7,333,584

NOTE 11—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Company follows fair value measurement  authoritative guidance, which defines  fair value,

establishes a framework for using fair  value to measure  assets and  liabilities,  and expands disclosures
about fair value measurements. The authoritative accounting  guidance defines fair  value as the price
that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer  a liability in  an orderly transaction  between
market participants at the measurement  date. The statement establishes a hierarchy for  inputs  used in
measuring fair value that maximizes the  use of observable inputs and minimizes  the use of
unobservable inputs by requiring that the  most observable  inputs  be  used  when available. Observable
inputs are inputs that market participants  would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based  on
market data obtained from sources independent of the  Company. Unobservable inputs are  inputs  that
reflect the Company’s assumptions of  what market participants would use in pricing the  asset or

98

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 11—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

liability developed based on the best  information available in  the circumstances. The hierarchy is
broken down into three levels based on the  reliability of the inputs as  follows:

Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for  identical assets or liabilities

Level 2: Quoted prices in active markets for  similar assets and liabilities, quoted
prices for identical or similar instruments in  markets  that are  not active,
and model-derived valuations whose inputs are  observable  or  whose
significant value drivers are observable

Level 3:

Significant inputs to the valuation model are unobservable

Financial assets and liabilities are to be classified based on the lowest  level of input that is

significant to the fair value measurement. The  Company’s assessment  of the significance of a  particular
input  to the fair value measurement requires  judgment,  and may  affect  the  valuation of  the fair value
of assets and liabilities and their placement  within the fair value hierarchy levels.

The following tables present the Company’s financial  assets  and liabilities that were accounted for
at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 and their classification within the
fair value hierarchy:

As of December 31, 2013

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Derivative  assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Derivative  liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$— $ 735,690
$— $1,740,824

$ 414,864
$4,782,177

Derivative  assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Derivative  liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$— $ 450,872
$— $5,173,140

$1,727,192
$1,235,168

As of December 31, 2012

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Derivatives

Fair value of all derivative instruments are estimated with industry-standard models that consider
various assumptions, including quoted  forward prices for commodities, time value of money, volatility
factors and current market and contractual  prices for the underlying instruments, as well  as other
relevant economic measures. All valuations were compared  against  counterparty statements  to  verify
the reasonableness of the estimate. The  Company’s  commodity swaps are validated by observable
transactions for the same or similar commodity options using  the NYMEX futures index, and are
designated as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy. The  Company’s collars, which are designated as
Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy, are not  validated by observable transactions  with respect to
volatility. Presently, all of our derivative arrangements are  concentrated with  five counterparties  all of
which  are lenders under the Company’s  Revolver.

For the oil and natural gas derivatives outstanding at  December 31,  2013, a hypothetical upward or

downward shift of 10% per Bbl or MMBtu in  the NYMEX forward  curve as of December 31, 2013
would change our derivative gain (loss) by $42.7 million and $(34.1) million, respectively.

99

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 11—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

The following table reflects the activity for  the commodity derivatives measured at  fair value  using

Level 3 inputs for the year ended December  31, 2013:

For the Year Ended
December 31, 2013

Derivative
Asset

Derivative
Liability

Beginning  balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net increase (decrease) in fair value(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net settlement(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
New derivatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Transfers in (out) of Level 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 1,727,192
(3,931,350)
(586,249)
3,205,271
—

$1,235,168
(416,705)
1,718,696
2,245,018
—

Ending  balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

414,864

$4,782,177

(1) Net increase (decrease) in fair value and  net settlements are shown  in the derivative gain
(loss) line item of the accompanying statements of  operations and comprehensive income.

The following table reflects the activity for  the commodity derivatives measured at  fair value  using

Level 3 inputs for the year ended December  31, 2012:

For the Year Ended
December 31, 2012

Derivative
Asset

Derivative
Liability

Beginning  balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net increase (decrease) in fair value(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net settlement(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
New derivatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Transfers in (out) of Level 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 881,822
796,287
(362,095)
411,178
—

$ 1,115,595
(3,239,647)
527,766
2,831,454
—

Ending  balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,727,192

$ 1,235,168

(1) Net increase (decrease) in fair value and  net settlements are shown  in the derivative gain
(loss) line item of the accompanying statements of  operations and comprehensive income.

Proved Oil and Gas Properties

Proved oil and gas property costs are evaluated  for impairment  and  reduced to fair value  when

there is an indication that the carrying  costs exceed the sum of the undiscounted cash flows. The
Company uses Level 3 inputs and the income valuation technique, which  converts  future amounts to a
single present value amount, to measure the  fair value of proved  properties through an application of
discount rates and price forecasts selected  by the  Company’s management.  The calculation  of the
discount rate is a significant management estimate  based on the best information available and
estimated to be 10% for the year ended December 31, 2013. Management believes  that  the discount
rate is representative of current market conditions  and reflects  the following factors:  estimate of future
cash payments, expectations of possible variations in the amount and/or timing of cash flows, the risk
premium, and nonperformance risk. The price forecast is based on the NYMEX strip pricing, adjusted

100

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 11—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

for basis differentials. Future operating costs are also adjusted as deemed appropriate for these
estimates. Proved properties classified as held for sale are  valued  using a  market approach, based on an
estimated selling price, as evidenced by  the most  current bid prices  received  from third  parties. If an
estimated selling price is not available,  the  Company utilizes the  income valuation technique discussed
above. There were no proved properties  measured at fair  value at December 31, 2013  and 2012.

Unproved Oil and Gas Properties

Unproved oil and gas property costs are  evaluated for  impairment and reduced to fair value when

there is an indication that the carrying  costs may not be recoverable. To measure the  fair value  of
unproved properties, the Company Level  3 inputs and the income  valuation technique,  which takes into
account the following significant assumptions: future development plans, risk  weighted  potential
resource recovery, and estimated reserve  values. Unproved properties classified as held for sale  are
valued  using a market approach, based  on  an estimated selling price, as  evidenced by the  most current
bid  prices received from third parties.  If an estimated selling price is  not available, the Company  use
the price received for similar acreage  in  recent transactions  by the  Company or other market
participants in the principal market. There  were no unproved properties measured at  fair value as of
December 31, 2013 and 2012.

Asset Retirement Obligation

The Company utilizes the income valuation technique to determine the  fair value of the asset
retirement obligation liability at the point  of inception by applying a credit-adjusted risk-free  rate,
which  takes into account the Company’s credit risk, the time  value of money, and the current  economic
state, to the undiscounted expected abandonment cash  flows. Upon  completion of  wells and natural gas
plants, the Company records an asset  retirement obligation at  fair value using Level 3 assumptions.
Given the unobservable nature of the inputs, the initial measurement of the  asset retirement obligation
liability is deemed to use Level 3 inputs. There were  no asset retirement obligations measured at fair
value at December 31, 2013 and 2012.

Long-term  Debt

The Senior Notes are recorded at cost net of the unamortized  premium on the accompanying
balance sheets at $508.8 million. The  fair value of the  Senior  Notes  as of December 31, 2013  was
$527.5 million measured using Level  1 inputs  based on a secondary market trading price. The carrying
value of the Company’s credit facility  approximates fair value, as the  applicable interest rates are
floating.

NOTE  12—DERIVATIVES

The Company enters into commodity derivative contracts to mitigate a portion of its exposure to
potentially adverse market changes in commodity prices and  the  associated impact on  cash flows. All
contracts are entered into for other-than-trading purposes.  The  Company’s derivatives include swaps
and collar arrangements for oil and gas  and  none  of the derivative instruments qualify  as having
hedging  relationships.

In a typical commodity swap agreement, if the agreed upon published third-party index price is
lower than the swap fixed price, the Company  receives the  difference between the index price and the

101

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 12—DERIVATIVES (Continued)

agreed upon swap fixed price. If the  index price is  higher than the swap fixed price, the  Company pays
the difference. For collar agreements, the Company receives the  difference between an  agreed upon
index  and the floor price if the index price  is below the floor price.  The Company pays  the difference
between the agreed upon ceiling price  and  the index price if  the index price  is above  the ceiling price.
No amounts are paid or received if the  index price  is between the floor and ceiling prices.

As of December 31, 2013, the Company had the  following  derivative commodity contracts in place:

Settlement Period

Derivative
Instrument

Total Volumes
(Bbls/MMBtu
per day)

Average
Fixed
Price

Average
Short Floor
Price

Average
Floor
Price

Average
Ceiling
Price

Oil
Swap
1Q 2014 . . . . . . . . .
Swap
2Q 2014 . . . . . . . . .
Swap
3Q 2014 . . . . . . . . .
4Q 2014 . . . . . . . . .
Swap
1Q 2014 . . . . . . . . . Collar
2Q 2014 . . . . . . . . . Collar
3Q 2014 . . . . . . . . . Collar
4Q 2014 . . . . . . . . . Collar
2014 . . . . . . . . . . . .
2015 . . . . . . . . . . . .

3-Way  Collar
3-Way  Collar

3,133
4,126
3,870
3,870
5,617
4,846
4,326
4,326
1,000
4,500

$96.97
$96.20
$93.04
$93.04

$86.33
$86.55
$86.16
$86.16
$85.00
$83.33

$97.09
$96.72
$96.57
$96.57
$99.50
$94.12

$60.00
$66.67

Gas
2014 . . . . . . . . . . . .
2015 . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total . . . . . . . . . . . .

3-Way  Collar
3-Way  Collar

15,000
15,000

$ 3.50
$ 3.50

$ 4.00
$ 4.00

$ 4.75
$ 4.75

Fair Market
Value  of
Asset
(Liability)

$ (403,499)
(288,370)
(518,444)
205,179
(1,338,410)
(1,252,787)
(615,971)
(68,724)
(303,314)
(782,385)

$(5,366,725)

$

$

122,173
(127,895)

(5,722)

$(5,372,447)

102

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 12—DERIVATIVES (Continued)

As of the date of filing we had the following economic  derivatives in place,  which settle monthly:

Settlement Period

Derivative
Instrument

Total Volumes
(Bbls/MMBtu
per day)

Average
Fixed
Price

Average
Short  Floor
Price

Average
Floor
Price

Average
Ceiling
Price

Oil
Swap
1Q 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Swap
2Q 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Swap
3Q 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4Q 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Swap
1Q 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Collar
2Q 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Collar
3Q 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Collar
4Q 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Collar
1Q 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2Q - 4Q 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gas
1Q 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2Q - 4Q 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3-Way  collar
3-Way  Collar
3-Way  Collar

3-Way  Collar
3-Way  Collar
3-Way  Collar

$96.97
$96.20
$93.04
$93.04

3,133
4,126
3,870
3,870
5,617
4,846
4,326
4,326
1,000
2,000
4,500

22,500
30,000
15,000

$86.33
$86.55
$86.16
$86.16
$85.00
$87.68
$83.33

$ 4.13
$ 4.21
$ 4.00

$97.09
$96.72
$96.57
$96.57
$99.50
$99.75
$94.12

$ 4.78
$ 4.81
$ 4.75

$60.00
$65.00
$66.67

$ 3.56
$ 3.63
$ 3.50

Derivative Assets and Liabilities Fair Value

The Company’s commodity derivatives are measured at fair value and are included in the

accompanying balance sheets as derivative assets and liabilities.

The following table contains a summary of all the Company’s derivative positions  reported on the

accompanying balance sheets as of December  31,  2013 and 2012:

As of December 31, 2013

Balance Sheet Location

Fair Value

Derivative Assets
Commodity  contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current assets
Commodity  contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Noncurrent  assets
Derivative Liabilities
Commodity  contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current liabilities
Commodity  contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term  liabilities

Total net derivative liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

857,863
292,691

(5,320,030)
(1,202,971)

$(5,372,447)

103

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 12—DERIVATIVES (Continued)

As of December 31, 2012

Balance Sheet Location

Fair Value

Derivative Assets
Commodity  contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current assets
Commodity  contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Noncurrent  assets
Derivative Liabilities
Commodity  contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current liabilities
Commodity  contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term  liabilities

Total net derivative liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 2,178,064
—

(5,200,202)
(1,208,106)

$(4,230,244)

The following table summarizes the components of the  derivative gain (loss) presented on  the

accompanying statements of operations  and comprehensive income:

For the Years Ended December 31,

2013

2012

2011

Derivative cash settlement gain (loss):

Oil contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gas contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$(11,755,140) $(1,491,948) $(3,694,974)
670,838

425,291

766,566

Total  derivative  cash  settlement  (loss)(1) . .

$(11,329,849) $ (725,382) $(3,024,136)

Change in fair value gain (loss):

Oil contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gas contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ (1,142,203) $ 1,649,687
—

—

Total change in fair value gain (loss) . . . . .

$ (1,142,203) $ 1,649,687

$

$

225,393
—

225,393

Total derivative gain (loss)(2) . . . . . . . . . .

$(12,472,052) $

924,305

$(2,798,743)

(1) Derivative cash settlement  gain (loss) is reported  in the derivative cash settlements  line
item on the accompanying statements of cash flows within the  net cash  used in investing
activities.

(2) Total derivative gain (loss) is reported in  the derivative gain (loss) line item  on the

accompanying statements of cash flows within the net cash provided  by operating
activities.

NOTE 13—EARNINGS PER SHARE

The Company issues shares of restricted stock entitling the holders  to  receive non-forfeitable
dividends, if and when, the Company were  to  declare a  dividend, before vesting, thus  making the
awards participating securities. The awards  are included in the  calculation  of  earnings per share  under
the two-class method. The two-class method allocates earnings for the period  between  common
shareholders and unvested participating  shareholders.

104

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 13—EARNINGS PER SHARE (Continued)

The following table sets forth the calculation of earnings  per basic and  diluted shares  from
continuing and discontinued operations  for the years ended December 31,  2013, 2012, and 2011:

Income from continuing operations:
Income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: undistributed earnings to unvested  restricted stock . . . .
Undistributed earnings to common shareholders . . . . . . . . . .
Basic income per common share from  continuing  operations .
Diluted income per common share from continuing

For the Years Ended December 31,

2013

2012

2011

$69,581,803
1,672,809
67,908,994
1.73
$

$44,570,601
825,295
43,745,306
1.12
$

$14,608,857
214,892
14,393,965
0.49
$

operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

1.72

$

1.12

$

0.49

Income (loss) from discontinued operations:
Income (loss) from discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: undistributed earnings to unvested  restricted stock . . . .
Undistributed earnings to common shareholders . . . . . . . . . .
Basic income (loss) per common share from discontinued

operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diluted income (loss) per common share from discontinued

operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Net income:
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: undistributed earnings to unvested  restricted stock . . . .
Undistributed earnings to common shareholders . . . . . . . . . .
Basic net income per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted net income per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted-average shares outstanding—basic . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Add: dilutive effect of contingent PSUs . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ (398,000) $ 1,951,976
36,144
1,915,832

(9,568)
(388,432)

$ (1,917,676)
(28,208)
(1,889,468)

$

$

(0.01) $

(0.01) $

0.05

0.05

$

$

(0.06)

(0.06)

$69,183,803
1,663,240
67,520,563
1.72
1.71
39,337,121
66,478

$
$

$46,522,577
861,439
45,661,138
1.17
1.17
39,051,739
—

$
$

$12,691,181
186,683
12,504,498
0.43
0.43
29,323,999
—

$
$

Weighted-average shares outstanding—diluted . . . . . . . . . . .

39,403,599

39,051,739

29,323,999

The Company had no anti-dilutive shares for the years ended  December 31, 2013, 2012,  and 2011.

During 2013, the Company determined that the issued  shares of restricted  stock are in  fact

participating securities and have applied the two-class method. The application of the two-class method
had no impact to the previously reported per share amounts.

105

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 14—OIL AND GAS ACTIVITIES

The Company’s oil and natural gas activities are entirely  within the United States. Costs incurred

in oil and natural gas producing activities are  as follows:

For the Years Ended December 31,

2013

2012

2011

Acquisition(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Development(2)(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exploration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 13,797,175
452,454,489
2,590,416

$ 58,843,099
341,135,387
4,821,190

$

1,894,300
109,231,551
58,034,514

Total(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$468,842,080

$404,799,676

$169,160,365

(1) Acquisition costs for unproved properties for  the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012,
and 2011 were $3,412,708, $57,048,277, and $1,131,599,  respectively. Acquisition costs for
proved properties for the years ended  December  31, 2013, 2012,  and 2011 were
$10,384,467, $1,794,822, and $761,701, respectively.

(2) Development costs include workover costs of $5,955,397,  $4,463,344 and  $2,808,663
charged to lease operating expense during  2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.

(3) Development costs include gas plant capital expenditures  of $4,288,886, $16,177,371, and

$25,069,757 for the years ended December 31,  2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.

(4) Includes amounts relating to ARO of $3,144,446, $1,448,063, and $139,771 for the years

ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and  2011, respectively.

The net changes in capitalized exploratory well costs are as follows:

Beginning balance at January 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additions to capitalized exploratory well costs

For the Years Ended December 31,

2013

2012

2011

$— $ 5,438,303

$

974,000

pending the determination of proved reserves . . . —

2,940,309

7,075,921

Reclassifications to wells, facilities and equipment

based on the determination of proved reserves . . —

— (2,611,618)

Capitalized exploratory well costs charged  to

expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — (8,378,612)

—

Ending balance at December 31 . . . . . . . . . . . .

$— $

— $ 5,438,303

During  the  year  ended  December  31,  2013,  the  Company  incurred  drilling  costs  for  one

exploratory well of $629,886 and deemed it a dry-hole by  the end  of  the year.  During  the year  ended
December 31, 2012, the Company incurred  $8,378,612 of dry hole expense.

NOTE 15—DISCLOSURES ABOUT  OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES (UNAUDITED)

The proved reserve estimates at December 31, 2013 are based on reports prepared by Netherland,
Sewell & Associates, Inc., our independent reserve engineers, whereas the December 31, 2012  and 2011
estimated proved reserved were prepared by Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc.  The estimates  of

106

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 15—DISCLOSURES ABOUT  OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES (UNAUDITED)
(Continued)

proved reserves are inherently imprecise and are  continually subject to revision  based on production
history, results of additional exploration  and development, price  changes and  other factors.

All of BCEI’s oil, natural gas liquids, and natural gas reserves are attributable to properties within

the United States. A summary of BCEI’s  changes in  quantities of proved oil,  natural gas  liquids, and
natural gas reserves for the years ended  December 31, 2013, 2012, and  2011 are  as follows:

Balance—December 31, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Extensions and discoveries(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sales of minerals in place . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchases of minerals in place . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Revisions to previous estimates(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Oil

(MBbl)(1)
22,379
7,182
—
(1,137)
—
(208)

Natural
Gas

(MMcf)
62,884
29,608
—
(2,776)
—
3,266

Balance—December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

28,216

92,982

Extensions and discoveries(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sales of minerals in place . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchases of minerals in place . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Revisions to previous estimates(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

12,016
(669)
(2,529)
—
(3,768)

50,667
—
(5,475)
—
(19,626)

Balance—December 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

33,266

118,548

Extensions and discoveries(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sales of minerals in place . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchases of minerals in place . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Revisions to previous estimates(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Balance—December 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proved developed reserves:

20,123
—
(4,257)
1,228
(3,878)

59,936
—
(9,976)
3,958
(32,852)

46,482

139,614

December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

11,842

December 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

15,675

December 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

22,273

Proved undeveloped reserves:

December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

16,374

December 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

17,591

December 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

24,209

31,313

48,942

59,250

61,669

69,606

80,364

(1) Natural gas liquids reserves are  classified  with oil reserves.

107

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 15—DISCLOSURES ABOUT  OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES (UNAUDITED)
(Continued)

(2) At December 31, 2013, horizontal  development in the  Wattenberg Field,  Rocky Mountain Region,
resulted in additions in extensions and discoveries of 28,908  MBoe, which is  96% of our total
additions of 30,112 MBoe. The remainder of the additions  came from our Dorcheat Madedonia
and McKamie Patton Fields, Mid-Continent Region.

At December 31, 2012, horizontal development in the  Wattenberg Field, Rocky Mountain Region,
resulted in additions in extensions and discoveries of 17,380  MBoe, which is  85% of our total
additions of 20,461 MBoe. The remainder of the additions  are  the result  of vertical drilling  during
the year in the Wattenberg Field and Proved Developed Non-producing and Proved  Undeveloped
reserve additions in the Dorcheat Macedonia Field, Mid-Continent Region.

At December 31, 2011, extensions and  discoveries of  12,117  MBoe resulted from  our  capital
program in the Wattenberg Field, Rocky Mountain Region.  The capital program consisted of  both
vertical and horizontal drilling in the Codell and Niobrara formations.

(3) At December 31, 2013, we revised  our proved reserves downward by 9,867 MBoe, excluding

pricing revisions, due primarily to the change  in focus from vertical to horizontal development in
the Watterberg Field. This accounted  for  69% of the downward revision  and included the
elimination of 45 net vertical locations from  proved undeveloped,  the elimination  of  all  proved
non-producing reserves associated with  vertical well refracs and recompletions, and  lower
performance from the vertical producers due to increased line  pressure. The  high line pressure
also affected the horizontal reserves creating  a negative revision of 1.8  MMBoe, or  18% of the
total downward revision. We had a small  positive pricing revision  of  514 MBoe from  an increase in
commodity price from $94.71 per Bbl WTI and $2.76 per MMBtu  HH  for the year ended
December 31, 2012 to $96.91 per Bbl  WTI and $3.67 per MMBtu HH for the  year  ended
December 31, 2013.

At December 31, 2012, we revised our proved reserves downward by 6,938 MBoe, excluding
pricing revisions, due primarily to a  combination  of  eliminating 50  locations from  proved
undeveloped reserves as a result of a  change in focus  from vertical  to  horizontal development and
lower performance than expected from our vertical producers in our  Wattenberg Field, Rocky
Mountain Region.  A small negative pricing revision of 101 MBoe  resulted from a  decrease in
commodity price from $96.19 per Bbl WTI and $4.12 per MMBtu  HH  for the year ended
December 31, 2011 to $94.71 per Bbl  WTI and $2.76 per MMBtu HH for the  year  ended
December 31, 2012.

At December 31, 2011, we revised our proved reserves upward  by 336  MBoe. This  positive revision
is primarily the result of an increase  in oil  price of $16.76 per Bbl  WTI from  $79.43 per Bbl at
December 31, 2010 to $96.19 per Bbl  at December 31, 2011. This positive revision  was partially
offset by small negative performance  revisions in  the Dorcheat Macedonia  Field, Mid-Continent
Region and in the  vertical producers in the  Wattenberg Field, Rocky  Mountain Region due to
surface pressure limitations.

The standardized measure of discounted  future net  cash flows relating to proved oil and  natural
gas reserves were prepared in accordance with accounting authoritative  guidance.  Future  cash inflows
were computed by applying prices to  estimated future production. Future production  and development
costs are computed by estimating the expenditures  to  be  incurred in  developing  and producing  the

108

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 15—DISCLOSURES ABOUT  OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES (UNAUDITED)
(Continued)

proved oil and natural gas reserves at year-end, based on  costs and assuming  continuation of existing
economic  conditions.

Future income tax expenses are calculated by applying appropriate year-end tax rates to future

pretax net cash flows relating to proved  oil  and natural gas reserves. Future income tax expenses give
effect to permanent differences, tax credits and loss carry forwards relating to the proved oil and
natural gas reserves. Future net cash flows  are discounted at a rate  of  10% annually to derive the
standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows. This calculation procedure  does not
necessarily result in an estimate of the fair market value or  the present value  of BCEI’s oil  and natural
gas properties.

The standardized measure of discounted  future net  cash flows relating to proved oil and  natural

gas reserves are as follows (in thousands):

For the Years Ended December 31,

2013

2012

2011

Future cash flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Future production costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Future development costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Future income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 4,799,149
(1,681,419)
(776,512)
(576,024)

$ 3,367,465
(1,037,537)
(684,160)
(298,201)

$2,887,010
(805,466)
(514,256)
(252,265)

Future net cash flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10% annual discount for estimated timing of
cash flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Standardized measure of discounted

1,765,194

1,347,567

1,315,023

(839,911)

(664,126)

(648,837)

future net cash flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

925,283

$

683,441

$ 666,186

Future cash flows as shown above were  reported without consideration for the effects of  derivative

transactions outstanding at period end.

109

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 15—DISCLOSURES ABOUT  OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES (UNAUDITED)
(Continued)

The changes in the standardized measure  of discounted future net cash flows relating  to  proved oil

and natural gas reserves are as follows (in thousands):

Beginning of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sale of oil and gas produced, net of production

costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net changes in prices and production costs . . . . .
Extensions, discoveries and improved recoveries . .
Development costs incurred . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Changes in estimated development cost . . . . . . . .
Purchases of mineral in place . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sales of mineral in place . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Revisions of previous quantity estimates . . . . . . .
Net change in income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accretion of discount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Changes in production rates and other . . . . . . . .

For the Years Ended December 31,

2013

2012

2011

$ 683,441

$ 666,186

$374,654

(346,679)
94,881
571,384
67,063
127,034
5,442
—
(212,034)
(150,704)
83,468
1,987

(189,840)
(81,527)
310,595
161,527
(9,404)
—
(14,909)
(156,867)
(23,441)
79,398
(58,277)

(84,888)
123,154
204,000
93,916
(62,175)
—

8,113
(40,866)
46,158
4,120

End of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 925,283

$ 683,441

$666,186

The average wellhead prices used in determining  future net  revenues related to the standardized
measure calculation as of December  31, 2013,  2012, and 2011 were calculated using the twelve-month
arithmetic average of first-day-of-the-month price inclusive  of  adjustments for quality and location.

Oil (per Bbl) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gas (per Mcf) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$92.03
$ 4.67

$91.04
$ 3.78

$89.80
$ 4.82

2013

2012

2011

110

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 16—QUARTERLY FINANCIAL  DATA (UNAUDITED)

The following is a summary of the unaudited  quarterly financial data for the years ended

December 31, 2013 and 2012:

2013
Oil and gas sales(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating  profit(1)(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Basic net income per common share . . . . . .
Diluted net income per common share . . . . .
2012
Oil and gas sales(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating  profit(1)(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Basic and diluted net income per common

March 31

June 30

September  30

December 31

Three Months Ended

$78,307,013
39,000,509
11,255,816
0.28
0.28

$
$

$84,517,472
36,750,600
14,714,908
0.36
0.36

$
$

$125,973,199
68,180,143
17,781,421
0.44
0.44

$
$

$133,062,418
62,779,799
25,431,658
0.64
0.63

$
$

$47,830,431
26,126,248
8,546,153

$51,455,094
28,696,782
21,506,103

$ 58,327,823
29,145,797
3,420,887

$ 73,591,893
36,665,466
13,049,434

share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

0.22

$

0.54

$

0.09

$

0.32

(1) Oil and gas sales less lease operating  expense, severance  and ad valorem taxes, depreciation, and

depletion and amortization.

(2) Amounts reflect results for continuing  operations and  exclude results for  discontinued operations
related to non-core properties in California sold or  held for sale as  of December 31, 2013  and
2012.

111

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants  on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and  Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial

officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures  as of December 31, 2013.
The term ‘‘disclosure controls and procedures,’’ as defined in Rules  13a-15(e)  and 15d-15(e) under the
Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a  company that are  designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed  by  a company in  the reports that  it files  or submits under  the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed,  summarized and reported, within  the time  periods  specified in
SEC rules and forms. Disclosure controls  and  procedures include, without limitation, controls and
procedures designed to ensure that information required  to  be  disclosed by a company  in the reports
that it files  or submits under the Exchange  Act is accumulated and  communicated to the company’s
management, including its principal executive  and  principal  financial  officers, as  appropriate  to  allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on the  evaluation of our disclosure controls  and
procedures as of December 31, 2013,  our principal executive officer and  principal financial officer
concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were  effective at the  reasonable
assurance  level.

Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no  matter  how well designed  and

operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their  objectives and  management
necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the  cost-benefit  relationship  of  possible  controls and
procedures.

Management’s Assessment of Internal Control Over Financial  Reporting

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal

control over financial reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). The Company’s  internal
control over financial reporting is a process designed  under the supervision of the Company’s Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial  Officer to provide reasonable assurance  regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with accounting principles  generally  accepted in the  United States. Because  of  its  inherent
limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not detect  or  prevent misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness to future  periods are subject to the risk that controls
may become inadequate because of changes in  conditions,  or that the degree of compliance with  the
policies or processes may deteriorate.

As of December 31, 2013, management assessed the  effectiveness  of  our internal control  over

financial reporting based on the criteria for effective  internal  control over financial reporting
established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework, issued  by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission in  1992. Based on the assessment,  management determined
that the Company maintained effective  internal control over financial  reporting  as of December 31,
2013, based on those criteria. Management  included in  its assessment of internal control over financial
reporting all consolidated entities.

Hein & Associates LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the

consolidated financial statements included in  this  Annual  Report on Form  10-K, has issued  an
attestation report on the effectiveness  of  internal control over financial  reporting  as of December 31,
2013, which is included in the consolidated financial statements in Item 8,  Part II  of this  Annual
Report on Form 10-K.

112

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in  management’s

evaluation pursuant to Rules 13a-15(d)  or 15d-15(d) of  the Exchange Act during  the year  ended
December 31, 2013 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our  internal
control over financial reporting.

113

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED  PUBLIC  ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc.

We  have audited Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc.’s internal  control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal  Control—Integrated  Framework issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations  of the Treadway Commission  in 1992. Bonanza Creek
Energy, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective  internal control over  financial
reporting and for its assessment of the  effectiveness  of  internal control  over financial reporting included
in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal  Control  Over Financial Reporting. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion  on  the company’s internal control  over  financial  reporting based
on our audit.

We  conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of  the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those  standards require that we  plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether  effective  internal control over financial reporting was maintained
in all material respects. Our audit included  obtaining an understanding  of internal control  over
financial reporting, assessing the risk that a  material weakness exists, and testing and  evaluating  the
design and operating effectiveness of internal  control  based on the assessed risk. Our  audit also
included performing such other procedures as we considered  necessary in the circumstances.  We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable  basis  for our  opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide  reasonable

assurance regarding the reliability of  financial  reporting and the preparation  of  financial  statements for
external  purposes in accordance with  generally accepted accounting  principles. A company’s internal
control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (a) pertain  to  the
maintenance of records that, in reasonable  detail, accurately and fairly reflect the  transactions and
dispositions of the assets of the company; (b) provide  reasonable  assurance that transactions are
recorded  as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in  accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, and that  receipts and expenditures of the company are being made  only
in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and  (c)  provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention  or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or
disposition of the company’s assets that  could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over  financial  reporting may not prevent or

detect misstatements. Also, projections  of any evaluation  of  effectiveness to future periods are  subject
to the risk that controls may become inadequate  because of changes in conditions, or  that  the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc. maintained,  in all material respects,  effective internal

control over financial reporting as of  December 31, 2013,  based on criteria  established in Internal
Control—Integrated  Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations  of  the Treadway
Commission in 1992.

We  have also audited, in accordance with the standards of  the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the  consolidated balance sheets of Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013 and 2012,  and  the related consolidated statements  of  operations
and comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity,  and cash flows for  each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2013, and our report dated February  28, 2014  expressed an  unqualified
opinion.

/s/ Hein & Associates LLP

Denver,  Colorado
February 28, 2014

114

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Item 9B. Other Information.

None.

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

PART III

The information required by this item is  incorporated by reference  to  Bonanza Creek

Energy, Inc.’s Proxy Statement for its 2014  Annual  Meeting of Stockholders to be filed  with the SEC
within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year  ended December 31, 2013.

Our board of directors has adopted a  Code of Business Conduct  and Ethics applicable to all
officers, directors and employees, which  is available on our website (www.bonanzacrk.com) under
‘‘Corporate Governance’’ under the ‘‘Investors’’ tab. We will provide a  copy of  this document to any
person, without charge, upon request,  by  writing to us at  Bonanza Creek  Energy, Inc., Investor
Relations Department, 410 17th Street, Suite 1400, Denver, Colorado 80202. We intend  to satisfy the
disclosure requirement under Item 406(c) of Regulation S-K regarding an amendment to, or waiver
from, a provision of our Code of Business Conduct  and  Ethics by posting such information on our
website at the address and the location specified  above.

Item 11. Executive  Compensation.

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference  to  Bonanza Creek

Energy, Inc.’s Proxy Statement for its 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed  with the SEC
within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year  ended December 31, 2013.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial  Owners and Management and Related Stockholder

Matters.

The information required by this item is  incorporated by reference  to  Bonanza Creek

Energy, Inc.’s Proxy Statement for its 2014  Annual  Meeting of Stockholders to be filed  with the SEC
within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transaction  and Director  Independence.

The information required by this item is  incorporated by reference  to  Bonanza Creek

Energy, Inc.’s Proxy Statement for its 2014  Annual  Meeting of Stockholders to be filed  with the SEC
within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year  ended December 31, 2013.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

The information required by this item  is incorporated by reference  to  Bonanza Creek

Energy, Inc.’s Proxy Statement for its 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed  with the SEC
within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.

115

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

PART IV

(a) The following documents are filed as a  part  of  this Annual Report on Form 10-K or

incorporated herein by reference:

(1) Financial  Statements:

See Item 8. Financial Statements and  Supplementary Data.

(2) Financial  Statement  Schedules:

None.

(3) Exhibits:

The information required by this Item  is set forth  on the exhibit index  that follows the
signature page to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

116

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Pursuant to the requirements of Section  13  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the

registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its  behalf  by the undersigned,  thereunto duly
authorized on February 28, 2014.

SIGNATURES

BONANZA CREEK ENERGY, INC.

By:

/s/ MARVIN M. CHRONISTER

Marvin M. Chronister,
Interim President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)

February 28, 2014

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose  signature appears  below

constitutes and appoints Marvin M. Chronister, William J. Cassidy,  and Wade E. Jaques and each of
them severally, his true and lawful attorney  or attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full  power  to  act  with
or without the others and with full power of substitution  and  resubstitution, to execute in  his name,
place and stead, in any and all capacities, any or all amendments to this report, and to file the  same,
with all  exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission, granting unto  said attorneys-in-fact and agents and each of them, full power
and authority to do and perform in the  name of  on behalf  of the undersigned, in any and  all  capacities,
each  and every act and thing necessary  or  desirable to be done  in and  about  the premises, to all intents
and purposes and as fully as they might  or  could do  in person, hereby ratifying, approving and
confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact  and agents or their  substitutes may lawfully do  or cause  to be
done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of  1934, this  annual report  has been

signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in  the capacities and on  the dates
indicated.

Date: February 28, 2014

By:

/s/ MARVIN M. CHRONISTER

Marvin M. Chronister,
Interim President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)

Date: February 28, 2014

By:

/s/ WILLIAM J. CASSIDY

William J. Cassidy,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer (principal financial officer)

Date: February 28, 2014

By:

/s/ WADE E. JAQUES

Wade E. Jaques,
Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer,  and
Treasurer (principal accounting officer)

117

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Date: February 28, 2014

By:

/s/ RICHARD J. CARTY

Richard J. Carty,
Chairman of the Board

Date: February 28, 2014

By:

/s/ GARY A. GROVE

Gary A. Grove,
Director, Executive Vice President—Engineering
and Planning

Date: February 28, 2014

By:

/s/ KEVIN A. NEVEU

Kevin A. Neveu,
Director

Date: February 28, 2014

By:

/s/ GREGORY P. RAIH

Gregory P. Raih,
Director

Date: February 28, 2014

By:

/s/ JAMES A. WATT

James A. Watt,
Director

118

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Exhibit
Number

3.1

3.2

4.1

4.2

10.1

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Description

Second Amended and Restated  Certificate of Incorporation of  Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc.,
filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on December 16, 2011 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form  8-K filed on  December 22,  2011)

Third Amended and Restated  Bylaws of Bonanza  Creek Energy, Inc. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on  August 1, 2013)

Form of Senior Debt Indenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the  Registration
Statement on Form S-3 filed on January 15, 2013)

Form of Subordinated Debt Indenture (incorporated by reference  to  Exhibit  4.5 to the
Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on  January 15, 2013)

Credit Agreement, dated as of March 29, 2011,  among  Bonanza Creek  Energy,  Inc., BNP
Paribas, as Administrative Agent, and the  lenders party  thereto  (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registration Statement  on Form  S-1 filed on  June  7, 2011)

10.2 Amendment No. 1, dated as of April 29, 2011,  to  the Credit Agreement, among Bonanza
Creek Energy, Inc., BNP Paribas, as Administrative Agent, and the lenders  party thereto
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the  Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on
June 7, 2011)

10.3 Amendment No. 2 & Agreement,  dated as of September  15, 2011, to the  Credit Agreement,
among Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc., BNP Paribas, as Administrative Agent, and the lenders
party thereto (incorporated by reference  to  Exhibit 10.14  to the Registration Statement  on
Form S-1/A filed on November 4, 2011)

10.4 Resignation, Consent and Appointment Agreement  and  Amendment  Agreement, dated of

April 6, 2012, by and among BNP Paribas, in its capacity  as Administrative Agent and Issuing
Lender, and the other parties thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1  to  the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed  on May 11, 2012)

10.5 Amendment No. 3 & Agreement,  dated as of May 8,  2012, to the Credit Agreement among

Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc., KeyBank National Association, as Administrative Agent, and the
lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference  to  Exhibit 10.1  to  the Quarterly Report  on
Form 10-Q filed on May 11, 2012)

10.6 Amendment No. 4, dated as of July 31,  2012 to the Credit Agreement  among  Bonanza Creek
Energy, Inc., Key Bank National Association,  as Administrative Agent,  and the  lenders party
thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed
on August 13, 2012)

10.7 Amendment No. 5 & Agreement,  dated as of October 30, 2012,  to  the Credit Agreement

among Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc., KeyBank  National Association, as Administrative  Agent,
and the lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2  to  the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 9,  2012)

10.8 Amendment No. 6, dated as of March 29, 2013,  to  the Credit Agreement among Bonanza

Creek Energy, Inc., KeyBank National Association, as Administrative Agent, and the lenders
party thereto (incorporated by reference  to  Exhibit 10.1  to the Quarterly  Report on
Form 10-Q filed on May 10, 2013)

119

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Exhibit
Number

Description

10.9 Amendment No. 7, dated as of May 16, 2013 to the Credit Agreement  among  Bonanza  Creek

Energy, Inc., Key Bank National Association,  as Administrative Agent,  and the  lenders party
thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed
on August 9, 2013)

10.10 Amendment No. 8, dated as  of November 6, 2013,  to  the Credit Agreement, among Bonanza
Creek Energy, Inc., the Guarantors, KeyBank National  Association, as Administrative Agent
and as Issuing Lender, and the lenders  party thereto (incorporated  by reference to
Exhibit 99.1 to the Current Report on Form  8-K  filed on November 8,  2013)

10.11 Registration Rights Agreement, among Bonanza Creek Energy,  Inc., Project Black Bear  LP,

Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Alberta, in  her own  capacity and as a trustee/nominee for
certain designated entities and certain other stockholders of the Registrant (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registration  Statement on  Form S-1/A  filed on July 25, 2011)

10.12

Form of Indemnity Agreement between Bonanza Creek  Energy, Inc.  and each  of  its  directors
and executive officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registration Statement
on Form S-1/A filed on July 25, 2011)

10.13* Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc. 2011 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference  to

Exhibit 10.10 to the Registration Statement  on Form  S-1/A filed on  November 4,  2011)

10.14* Form of Restricted Stock Agreement  (Employee) under the  2011 Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc.
Long Term Incentive Plan (incorporated  by reference to Exhibit  10.3 to the Quarterly  Report
on Form 10-Q filed on August 13, 2012)

10.15* Form of Restricted Stock Agreement  (Director)  under the 2011 Bonanza  Creek Energy, Inc.
Long Term Incentive Plan (incorporated  by reference to Exhibit  10.4 to the Quarterly  Report
on Form 10-Q filed on August 13, 2012)

10.16

Form of Performance Share  Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March  29, 2013)

10.17* Employment Letter Agreement  effective April 29, 2013 between Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc.
and Michael R. Starzer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2  to  the Current  Report on
Form 8-K filed on May 3, 2013)

10.18* Employment Letter Agreement  effective April 29, 2013 between Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc.

and Gary A. Grove (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Current  Report on
Form 8-K filed on May 3, 2013)

10.19* Employment Letter Agreement  effective April 29, 2013 between Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc.
and Patrick A. Graham (incorporated  by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Current Report  on
Form 8-K filed on May 3, 2013)

10.20* Employment Letter Agreement  effective April 29, 2013 between Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc.
and Christopher I. Humber (incorporated  by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the  Current Report
on Form 8-K filed on May 3, 2013)

10.21* Employment Letter Agreement,  dated August 6, 2013, between Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc.
and William J. Cassidy (incorporated by  reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the  Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on August 13, 2013)

10.22* Employment Letter Agreement,  dated August 7, 2013, between Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc.
and Anthony G. Buchanon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report
on Form 8-K filed on August 13, 2013)

120

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Exhibit
Number

10.23

Form of Employment Letter Agreement (incorporated  by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of  the
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March  29, 2013)

Description

10.24* Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc. Executive Change in Control and Severance Plan, as amended

(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current  Report on  Form 8-K filed on May 3,
2013)

10.25* Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc. Short Term Incentive Guidelines (incorporated by reference  to

Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report on  Form 10-Q filed on  May  10, 2013)

10.26

Contribution Agreement, dated  as of December 23, 2010,  among  Bonanza  Creek  Energy, Inc.,
Bonanza Creek Energy Company, LLC,  Bonanza Creek Energy Operating Company, LLC,
Bonanza Creek Energy Resources, LLC and  members of  Holmes  Eastern Company, LLC
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the  Registration Statement on Form S-1/A filed
on July  25, 2011)

10.27 Registration Rights Agreement, dated April  9, 2013, among  Bonanza Creek  Energy,  Inc., the

guarantors named therein and Wells  Fargo Securities, LLC,  as representative of the  initial
purchasers named therein (incorporated by  reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on April 11, 2013)

10.28

10.29

Indenture, dated as of April  9, 2013, among Bonanza  Creek Energy,  Inc., the guarantors
named therein and Wells Fargo Bank,  National Association, as trustee  (incorporated  by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Current  Report  on Form 8-K filed on April 11,  2013)

Purchase Agreement, dated  April  4, 2013, among Bonanza Creek  Energy,  Inc., the subsidiary
guarantors named therein and Wells  Fargo Securities, LLC,  as representative of the  initial
purchasers named therein (incorporated by  reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on April 5, 2013)

10.30 Underwriting Agreement, dated  January 31,  2013, among Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc. and

Project Black Bear LP and Credit Suisse  Securities (USA) LLC and Raymond James &
Associates, Inc., as representatives of  the  several  underwriters listed therein (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 1.1 of the Current  Report  on Form 8-K filed on February  4, 2013)

10.31 Underwriting Agreement, dated  November 12, 2013, among Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc., the
subsidiary guarantors named therein and  Wells  Fargo Securities, LLC, as  representative of the
underwriters named therein (incorporated  by reference to Exhibit 1.1  of  the Current Report
on Form 8-K filed on November 15, 2013)

21.1† List of subsidiaries

23.1† Consent of Hein & Associates LLP

23.2† Consent of Independent Petroleum  Engineers,  Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc.

23.3† Consent of Independent Petroleum  Engineers,  Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc.

31.1† Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant  to  Rule 13a-14(a)

31.2† Certification of the Chief Financial  Officer pursuant to Rule  13a-14(a)

32.1† Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted

pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (furnished herewith)

32.2† Certification of the Chief Financial  Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350, as adopted

pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (furnished herewith)

121

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Exhibit
Number

Description

99.1† Report of Independent Petroleum Engineers, Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. for

reserves as of December 31, 2013

101† The following material from the Bonanza Creek Energy,  Inc Annual Report on Form 10-K  for
the year ended December 31, 2013 (and related periods),  formatted in  XBRL (eXtensible
Business Reporting Language) include (i)  the  Condensed Consolidated  Balance Sheets,
(ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements  of Operations and  Comprehensive  Income,
(iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements  of Stockholders’ Equity,  (iv) the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements. The information in Exhibit 101 is ‘‘furnished’’ and not ‘‘filed’’, as
provided in Rule 402 pf Regulation S-T

* Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or  Arrangement

†

Filed or furnished herewith

122

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Subsidiaries of Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Bonanza Creek Energy Operating Company, LLC, a  Delaware limited liability  company

Bonanza Creek Energy Resources, LLC,  a Delaware limited liability company

Bonanza Creek Energy Upstream, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

Bonanza Creek Energy Midstream, LLC,  a Delaware limited liability company

Holmes Eastern Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

Exhibit  21.1

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form  S-3

(333-186019 and 333-192258) and the Registration Statement on Form  S-8 (Registration
No. 333-179207) of Bonanza Creek Energy,  Inc. of our reports dated  February 28, 2014, relating to our
audits of the consolidated financial statements and  internal control  over financial reporting, included in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bonanza Creek  Energy, Inc.  for the  year  ended December  31,
2013.

Exhibit  23.1

/s/ HEIN & ASSOCIATES LLP

Denver,  Colorado
February 28, 2014

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Exhibit  23.3

9JUL201022175810

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM  ENGINEERS

The undersigned hereby consents to the  references to our firm  in the form and context  in which
they appear in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc.  for the  year ended
December 31, 2013. We hereby further consent  to  the use  of information contained in  our reports
setting forth the estimates of revenues from Bonanza Creek  Energy, Inc.’s oil and gas reserves as  of
December 31, 2012 and 2011. We further consent to the incorporation by reference  thereof  into
Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc.’s Registration Statements on Form  S-8 (Registration No.  333-179207) and
on Form S-3 (Registration Nos. 333-186019 and 333-192258).

Yours truly,

CAWLEY, GILLESPIE & ASSOCIATES

19MAR201211283614

J. Zane Meekins, P.E.
Executive Vice President

Fort  Worth, Texas
February 28, 2014

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Exhibit  31.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE  OFFICER  PURSUANT  TO  RULE 13a-14(a)

I, Marvin M. Chronister, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31, 2013 of
Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc.;

2. Based on my  knowledge, this report does  not  contain any untrue statement of  a material fact or

omit to state a material fact necessary  to  make the statements made,  in light  of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periods  covered by this
report;

3. Based on my  knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial  information included in this
report, fairly present in all material  respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in  this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying  officer and  I are responsible for establishing and  maintaining

disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange  Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as  defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or  caused such  disclosure controls and

procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material  information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over  financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under  our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with  generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and

presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered  by this  report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s  internal control over  financial reporting
that occurred during the registrant’s  most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially  affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying  officer and  I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control  over financial reporting, to the registrant’s  auditors and the  audit committee of
the registrant’s board of directors (or persons  performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal

control over financial reporting which are  reasonably likely  to  adversely affect the registrant’s
ability to record, process, summarize and report  financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves  management or other employees who have a

significant role in the registrant’s internal control over  financial reporting.

Date: February 28, 2014

/s/ MARVIN M. CHRONISTER

Marvin M. Chronister,
Interim President and Chief Executive Officer

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Exhibit  31.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE  13a-14(a)

I, William J. Cassidy, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Annual Report on  Form 10-K for the year  ended  December 31, 2013 of
Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does  not  contain any untrue statement  of  a material fact or

omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,  in light  of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading  with respect to the periods  covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and  other financial  information included in  this
report, fairly present in all material respects  the financial condition, results of operations and  cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the  periods presented in  this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying  officer  and I are responsible for establishing and  maintaining

disclosure controls and procedures (as defined  in Exchange  Act Rules 13a-15(e) and  15d-15(e))
and  internal control over financial reporting (as  defined in  Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,  or  caused such  disclosure controls and

procedures to be designed under our  supervision, to ensure that material  information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated  subsidiaries, is made  known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in  which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under  our supervision,  to  provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting  principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls  and procedures and

presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change  in the registrant’s  internal control over  financial  reporting
that occurred during the registrant’s  most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially  affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant’s internal  control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying  officer  and I have disclosed, based on our most recent  evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting,  to  the registrant’s  auditors and the  audit committee of
the registrant’s board of directors (or persons  performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses  in the design or operation of internal

control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely  to  adversely affect  the registrant’s
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves  management or other employees who have a

significant role in the registrant’s internal control over  financial  reporting.

Date: February 28, 2014

/s/ WILLIAM J. CASSIDY

William J. Cassidy
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Exhibit  32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Bonanza  Creek Energy,  Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) on

Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013  as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the  ‘‘Report’’),  I, Marvin M. Chronister, Interim  President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,  as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act  of 2002,  that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d)  of  the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial

condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 28, 2014

/s/ MARVIN M. CHRONISTER

Marvin M. Chronister,
Interim President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required  by  section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging or otherwise adopting  the signature that  appears  in typed  form within  this electronic
version of this written statement required by section 906, has  been provided to Bonanza Creek
Energy, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon  request.

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

This line represents final trim and will not print

Exhibit  32.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Bonanza  Creek  Energy, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) on

Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013  as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the  ‘‘Report’’),  I, William J. Cassidy, Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to  18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act  of 2002,  that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d)  of  the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial

condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 28, 2014

/s/ WILLIAM J. CASSIDY

William J. Cassidy
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required  by  section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging or otherwise adopting  the signature that  appears  in typed  form within  this electronic
version of this written statement required by section 906, has  been provided to Bonanza Creek
Energy, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon  request.

This proof is printed at 96% of original size

|  EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Marvin M. Chronister
Director, Interim President &
Chief Executive Officer

Anthony G. Buchanon
Executive Vice President,
Chief Operating Officer

William J. Cassidy
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer

Christopher I. Humber
Senior Vice President,
General Counsel &
Corporate Secretary

Lynn E. Boone
Senior Vice President, 
Reservoir Engineering

Wade E. Jaques
Vice President,
Chief Accounting Officer

|  NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS

Richard J. Carty
Chairman of the Board

Kevin A. Neveu
Director 

Gregory P. Raih
Director

James A. Watt
Director

CORPORATE INFORMATION

COMMITTED 
TO STAYING 
AHEAD

On behalf of the Board of 

Directors, management and 

employees, we thank you for your 

support of Bonanza Creek. 

|  COMPANY HEADQUARTERS

410 17th Street, Suite 1400
Denver, Colorado 80202
(720) 440-6100 Main
(720) 305-0804 Fax

www.bonanzacrk.com 

|  2013 CORPORATE DATA 

Market Capitalization: $1.7 billion
52 Week Range: $27.79–$56.44
Shares Outstanding: 39.4 MM 

|  INDEPENDENT RESERVOIR 
ENGINEERS

Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc.
1601 Elm Street, Suite 4500 
Dallas, Texas 75201
Phone: (214) 969-5401

|  INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

Hein & Associates LLP  
1999 Broadway, Suite 4000 
Denver, Colorado 80202 
Phone: (303) 298-9600

|  TRANSFER AGENT

Computershare Trust Company N.A.  
250 Royall Street
Canton, Massachusetts 02021
Phone: (781) 575-2000 

|  STOCK EXCHANGE LISTING  
Shares of Bonanza Creek Energy 
are listed and traded on the  
New York Stock Exchange.

The trading symbol is BCEI.

|  ANNUAL MEETING OF 
STOCKHOLDERS

The Annual Meeting of Stockholders 
will be held on Thursday, June 5, 
2014, at 9:00 a.m. (Mountain Time) 
at the Sheraton Denver Downtown 
Hotel, 1550 Court Place, Denver, 
Colorado 80202.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS 
This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements regarding estimates of 
reserves, the strength of our balance sheet, and plans and expectations for our 
business. Actual results may differ materially from those anticipated due to many 
factors. For more information, see “Forward-Looking Statements” on pages ii and iii 
of our Form 10-K included in this report.

Annual Report Design by Curran & Connors, Inc. / www.curran-connors.com

410 17TH STREET

SUITE 1400

DENVER, CO 80202

720-440-6100

WWW.BONANZACRK.COM