Quarterlytics / Technology / Telecommunications Services / CNOOC Limited

CNOOC Limited

cnu · ASX Technology
Claim this profile
Ticker cnu
Exchange ASX
Sector Technology
Industry Telecommunications Services
Employees 501-1000
← All annual reports
FY2012 Annual Report · CNOOC Limited
Loading PDF…
2012
Chorus Annual Report

Highlights

EBITDA

$399m

Earnings before interest, income tax, depreciation and amortisation 

Dividend

14.6

Cents per share (see page F.3 for details)

Fixed line connections 

1,776,000 

Craig Davison – Programme Manager (RBI Deployment)

P.2

P.2

P.4-5

P.6

 “ A pleasing start to our operations  

as a standalone business,” says CEO  
Mark Ratcliffe.

The new Chorus is up and running, 
working from the outset to get people 
and processes in place.

Team settles into its stride with Ultra Fast 
Broadband and Rural Broadband Initiative 
projects throughout New Zealand.

Chorus awarded Aon Hewitt Best 
Employers Accreditation following  
85% engagement in first staff survey.

F.1

Management Commentary  
& Financial Statements  
(follows P.6)

P.7

Governance & Disclosures  
(follows F.32)

A pleasing start

Report from chairman Sue Sheldon and CEO Mark Ratcliffe

Chorus’ first ‘year’ as a standalone company has been a huge one.  

Hitting the ground running, we’ve put in place a comprehensive business plan based on our ability to deliver on  
our short and long term goals and, in line with being an open access wholesaler, have increased transparency for  
all our stakeholders about the factors that influence our business.

We’ve kept the network and daily 

time when you think of the years it took 

the benefits a fibre network and faster 

new ways to work with our customers,  

operations running for our customers – 

to put our copper network in place. We’re 

broadband can bring. Our experience in 

to lead New Zealand through this 

achieving our best network performance 

satisfied with the progress we’ve made to 

these early stages is in line with gradual 

landscape change. 

in a decade – against a backdrop of 

date in building the new network under 

uptake trends for new technology 

establishment of a standalone dual  

the terms of our contract with the Crown. 

adoption. We’re working closely with  

listed company. 

We’ve made early learnings and identified 

our customers and other stakeholders  

As a cornerstone partner to the Crown, 

Chorus is privileged to be building a large 

part of the new Ultra Fast Broadband fibre 

optic network. As it rolls out, it will change 

the way New Zealanders communicate 

and interact with the world, opening  

the doors to opportunities we don’t  

ongoing improvements that we can take 

to encourage everyone to play their part 

forward into future years. We’ve been 

in getting New Zealand on the road to  

working closely with local councils  

a fibre world.

to co-ordinate build work, and have 

increased community engagement and 

communications as we’ve gone from 

neighbourhood to neighbourhood.

Our people are central to Chorus.  

We value diversity. Our people include 

those who have a rich history and 

decades of experience in running 

yet perceive.

But it doesn’t end with getting fibre in the 

telecommunications networks and those 

This is a massive undertaking – not just 

for Chorus but for the industry as a whole. 

It’s a long term project to be completed 

by 2019 – though that’s a relatively short 

ground. The real success comes not only 

who have joined recently, bringing new 

in building the network – but critically  

ideas and a fresh perspective. Together 

in ensuring an efficient migration so that 

we can build the new network right and 

people use it and New Zealanders realise 

build it to last while looking to open up 

It’s this combination that gives us  

the confidence to build from our first  

year, shifting our focus to embedding 

operational efficiencies and earning  

the licence to lead in this fibre journey.

This report is dated 21 September 2012 and is  

signed on behalf of the Board of Chorus Limited:

Sue Sheldon

Chairman

Mark Ratcliffe

Chief Executive Officer

Getting the new Chorus up and running

In what must surely be one of the fastest corporate demergers in the world, Chorus demerged from Telecom on  
1 December 2011. Right from the outset, Chorus got busy getting the right people and teams on board and putting 
processes in place to make sure it was set up for success as a publicly listed company – and one with a leading role  
in delivering a new fibre network for New Zealand. 

In addition to new recruits, people from the 

Chorus moved into a second Wellington 

to be part of setting the tone for a new 

this, it has also maintained existing 

Chorus and Telecom Wholesale business 

office in Jervois Quay and new offices  

company and a new direction for the 

network operations at the best 

units make up a significant portion of the 

in Wyndham Street in Auckland to 

telecommunications industry. 

performance levels in a decade and  

current team. This provides continuity, as 

accommodate the more than 500-strong 

Chorus is still tasked with managing and 

team which includes people from various 

building the fixed line last mile network. 

parts of the corporate, shared services 

Chorus also took on the responsibility of 

and other Telecom business units.  

providing the wholesale access services 

Chorus also benefits from fresh 

that other retail service providers use to 

perspectives brought in by its new 

connect to their end users. 

recruits, who relish the opportunity  

In its establishment year, Chorus focused 

on developing the business strategy and 

operational programmes that help make 

sure it runs smoothly and has a clear 

direction to deliver on its commitments to 

stakeholders and shareholders. Alongside 

made satisfactory strides in rolling out 

massive programmes of work with the 

Ultra Fast Broadband (UFB) and Rural 

Broadband Initiative (RBI) deployments.

887,000 
direct fed 
connections

Fibre to  
the node

889,000  
lines via distribution cabinets

7,007 
distribution cabinets
(11,444 total cabinets)

Fibre to  
the premises

29,000km 
fibre

Fibre backhaul links 
local exchanges to other 
exchanges or retail service 
provider networks

P. 2

602 
local exchanges

Mobile service  
provider cell tower

The access 
network connects 
a home, business 
or structure to the 
telecommunications 
equipment – often a 
local exchange

Chorus Network Overview

KEY

Fibre

Copper

Directors

Sue Sheldon CNZM, BCom, FCA
Chairman; director since 1 July 2011; independent

Anne Urlwin, BCom, CA, F InstD, FNZIM, ACIS 
Director since 1 December 2011; independent

Clayton Wakefield, BSc (Computer Science), 
GradDip Mgmt

Sue is a professional company director. She is 
chairman of Freightways, deputy chairman of 
the Reserve Bank of New Zealand, a director 
of Contact Energy, and Paymark. She is a 
former director of Telecom, Smiths City Group 
and Meridian Energy, among others. She has 
extensive experience as both a chairman and 
member of audit and risk committees and is a 
former president of the New Zealand Institute 
of Chartered Accountants. Sue was made a 
Companion of the New Zealand Order of Merit 
for services to business in 2007.

Anne has 20 years’ directorship experience 
across many sectors, including energy, health, 
construction, regulatory services, internet 
infrastructure, research, banking, forestry and 
the primary sector, as well as education, sports 
administration and the arts. Anne is chairman of 
Lakes Environmental and Naylor Love Enterprises 
and is a director of Southern Response Earthquake 
Services. She is the former chairman of the  
New Zealand Blood Service and of New Zealand 
Domain Name Registry, and a former director  
of Meridian Energy.

Director since 1 December 2011; independent

Clayton has over 30 years’ experience in the 
banking, financial services, telecommunications 
and technology industries. He is an executive 
director and owner of Techspace, a leading 
New Zealand independent IT advisory company 
working with New Zealand’s major corporates. 
From 2001 to 2007 he was Head of Technology 
and Operations at ASB Bank. He was previously  
a director and chairman of Electronic Transaction 
Services and of Visa New Zealand, and is currently 
an independent director of Endace Ltd.

Jon Hartley, BA Econ Accounting (Hons), 
Fellow ICA (England & Wales), Associate ICA 
(Australia), Fellow AICD

Director since 1 December 2011; independent

Jon is a Chartered Accountant and fellow of  
the Australian Institute of Company Directors.  
He has held senior roles across a diverse range 
of commercial and not for profit organisations in 
several countries, including chairman of SkyCity,  
CEO of Brierley New Zealand and Solid Energy, 
and CFO of Lend Lease in Australia. Jon is deputy 
chairman of ASB Bank, Sovereign Life and 
VisionFund International, a director of Mighty 
River Power and VisionFund Cambodia, and 
trustee of World Vision New Zealand and the 
Wellington City Mission.

Keith Turner, BE (Hons), ME, PhD
Director since 1 December 2011; independent

Mark Ratcliffe, BA Accounting
Director since 9 December 2011; non-independent

Prue Flacks, LLB, LLM.
Director since 1 December 2011; independent

Dr Keith Turner was CEO of New Zealand 
electricity generator and retailer Meridian 
Energy for nine years from its establishment 
in 1999. He is now the chairman of Fisher and 
Paykel Appliances, deputy chairman of Auckland 
International Airport and a director of Spark 
Infrastructure, an Australian listed company. 
He is also a director of several small start-up 
enterprises. Keith has had an extensive career 
in electricity, taking part in much of its reform 
including separation of Transpower from 
Electricity Corporation of New Zealand Ltd 
(ECNZ) in 1992, the separation of Contact Energy 
from ECNZ in 1996 and the eventual break up  
of ECNZ into three companies in 1999.

Mark has been CEO of Chorus since it was 
established in 2007 as an operationally separate 
business unit within Telecom, and was appointed 
CEO in the new entity in July last year. In a 20 
year career with Telecom, Mark held finance, 
marketing, product development, product 
management and IT roles and was promoted 
to the executive team in 1999 where he was 
CIO (including a period as joint CEO of AAPT 
in Australia) and then COO Technology and 
Wholesale before becoming CEO of Chorus.  
From May 2010, he led the team that secured 
Chorus’ participation in the Government’s  
UFB initiative and the demerger of Chorus  
and Telecom.

Prue is a director of Bank of New Zealand and 
associated companies, Mighty River Power and 
a trustee of the Victoria University Foundation. 
She is a barrister and solicitor with extensive 
experience in commercial law and, in particular, 
banking, finance and securities law. Her areas 
of expertise include corporate and regulatory 
matters, corporate finance, capital markets, 
securitisation and business restructuring. Prue  
is a consultant to Russell McVeagh, where she 
was previously a partner for 20 years.

Executive
Team

Mark Ratcliffe
Chief Executive Officer 
See above.

Andrew Carroll, MCA (Hons)
Chief Financial Officer

Chris Dyhrberg, BCom, LLB
General Manager, Network Build

Andrew joined Chorus after nine years 
with Telecom where, as Head of Mergers & 
Acquisitions, he was involved in the Gen-i 
acquisition and the sale of Yellow Pages. Prior 
to this he worked in investment banking for a 
decade. Andrew worked closely with the Chorus 
team on the UFB negotiations with Crown Fibre 
Holdings and throughout the demerger process.

Chris held a variety of marketing, industry and 
commercial management roles with Telecom  
over many years and has played a key role in 
developing and implementing major changes 
in New Zealand’s telecommunications industry. 
He has also worked at Transpower, the Central 
Regional Health Authority and Capital Coast Health.

Ed Beattie
General Manager, Infrastructure Operations

Ewen Powell, BE 
Chief Information Officer

Irene Lovejoy
Executive Assistant

Ed has more than 30 years’ experience in 
building and maintaining fixed line and mobile 
telecommunications networks in New Zealand. 
Most recently, he managed the delivery of the 
successful Fibre to the Node programme and 
played a lead role in the Christchurch crisis 
response and restoration activities.

Ewen has nearly 20 years’ experience in managing 
the technology, services and partnerships that 
operate a national communications network. 
Much of his career was spent at Telecom where 
he was at the forefront of a wide range of 
technology changes, most recently driving the 
technology changes required to achieve Chorus’ 
operational separation requirements.

Before joining Chorus, Irene spent 22 years with 
Telecom where she held roles in the marketing, 
technology and corporate teams. She has 
worked with Chorus CEO Mark Ratcliffe for  
more than 13 years, bringing a unique insight 
that adds value to the development of the 
Chorus executive team.

Nick Woodward
General Manager, Customer Services

Sara Broadhurst, BA, Dip (Bus), Dip (Psych), 
PG Dip (Psych)

Vanessa Oakley, LLB (Hons), PGCert (MgtSt), 
PGCert (CompPolicy) (UK), GAICD, MInstD 

Victoria Crone, MCA 
General Manager, Sales and Marketing

General Manager, Human Resources

General Counsel & Company Secretary

Nick’s career combines a wide range of IT,  
sales and customer management experience  
in the financial and telecommunications 
industries. His roles have seen him work across 
the United States and Europe for Hutchison 3G 
UK and Household Bank in the United Kingdom. 
Before joining Chorus, he headed up Telecom’s 
Channel Planning and Operations group.

Sara joined Chorus in 2008, bringing more 
than 10 years’ experience in human resources 
in New Zealand and the United Kingdom from 
a wide range of industries including housing, 
manufacturing, banking and not for profit 
organisations. She previously held human 
resources roles in New Zealand for ANZ  
National Bank, EFTPOS and Barnardos.

Vanessa has extensive experience in law and 
policy, especially in relation to regulated 
infrastructure businesses. A qualified lawyer in 
New Zealand and England and Wales, Vanessa 
joined Chorus after playing a key role in the  
UFB contract, legislative and demerger 
processes. Prior to that she has held roles  
in the public and private sectors including  
as a key adviser to UK and New Zealand 
regulators and across the Telecom group.

Victoria has extensive experience in bringing 
telecommunications products and services to 
market. She has held several senior business, 
sales and marketing roles with Telecom, 
including responsibility for the sales strategy 
and operations for its retail business, managing 
offerings for the business market and developing 
Telecom’s proposition for next generation 
products and services.

P. 3

Team settles into its stride with  
marathon UFB project

Rolling out the Government’s UFB plan is a nine year marathon project. Chorus has made a solid start, building on an 
extensive existing fibre network and drawing on technical network expertise and experience. However, as any marathon 
runner will tell you, preparation is everything. Chorus’ effort in the first year has focused on setting up and bedding in 
processes and fibre training for field staff. There have been a lot of lessons learned in these early stages and Chorus is 
now settling into its stride and looking good for the long haul.

In May 2011, Chorus was selected by Crown 

The work to get things started was carried 

to further reduce deployment costs by,  

With an open mind on ways of doing 

Fibre Holdings Ltd (CFH) to roll out UFB in 

out in parallel with getting work done.  

for example, trench sharing and linking  

things and a continuous improvement 

24 of the 33 areas nationwide. This contract 

At 30 June 2012 deployment was underway 

with footpath replacement programmes  

focus, in many respects Chorus’ first year 

– with Crown funding up to NZ$929 million 

in 12 UFB areas from Albany to Invercargill, 

to minimise reinstatement costs.  

deployment has been a learning process 

– will see Chorus deploy around 17,000km 

with teams drilling, digging or hauling  

Employing a consistent approach  

and it is continuing to refine deployment 

of new fibre optic cables to areas covering 

cable into existing ducts to install new fibre 

across UFB and RBI (see separate story)  

approaches and methods. Chorus is 

around 70% of the UFB footprint. 

network past about 42,000 premises, with 

creates further efficiencies since it  

working with CFH to identify places where 

Much of the work in the first months of 

the UFB rollout has been establishing the 

processes to manage this major project and 

thousands more close to completion. This 

can use many of the same materials  

there is high density or priority users and 

meant more than 57,000 customers were 

on both jobs. 

where there’s indicated demand for fibre 

within reach of UFB services.

Achieving the lowest total cost of 

based services. 

mobilise the necessary resources. Chorus 

Chorus is reusing much of its existing 

ownership for the UFB network is just as 

Chorus, as well as CFH, has three 

has worked closely with partners and 

network. This includes the 29,000km  

important as controlling deployment costs. 

representatives on the UFB Steering 

councils to establish the frameworks and 

fibre network connecting telephone 

Aerial networks are more costly to maintain 

Committee which oversees material 

plans that will be refined as the deployment 

exchanges and suburban broadband 

in the long term. Chorus is also acutely 

matters relating to UFB and deployment.

progresses. Training staff has also been a 

cabinets. With 60% to 70% of deployment 

aware of communities’ demands for 

priority given the need to build and then 

costs relating to civil work, Chorus is using 

moving aerial infrastructure underground 

deploy teams in the field – from none 

as much of its existing duct network as 

and wants to avoid the cost of redeploying 

initially to more than 200.

possible. Half of Chorus’ existing network 

the network over time. For these reasons 

is already ducted. Chorus is also working 

the preference is to put the network along 

with councils and utility companies  

the streets underground. 

Chorus is committed to keeping 

communities well informed about work in 

their area and helping minimise disruption 

and inconvenience wherever possible. 

The fibre build continues through to 2019.

First customers connected to UFB

Connecting homes and businesses is the final leg of the journey in the UFB rollout and the one that will really make a 
difference to the way New Zealanders experience the internet. Right now, Chorus is trialling the process for installing 
UFB, working out the best method to connect the first UFB customers. The task involves installing the fibre cable from 
the boundary as well as completing the in-home installation of the optical network terminal (ONT), which is essentially 
the modem for fibre.

The lounge is emerging as the preferred 

Chorus is continuing to work with retail 

educating New Zealanders on the  

location for the ONT. With end users 

service providers around developing new 

benefits of fibre and the migration path  

increasingly multi-tasking – talking on 

fibre services, designing the best possible 

to a fibre world.

the phone, working on a laptop and 

installation experience and together

using smart devices like TV and mobile 

phones for high bandwidth applications 

– it’s clear the living room is where most 

bandwidth is consumed. From there, there 

are various options for integrating with the 

existing home wiring, depending on the 

retail service provider’s offering and the 

type of service their end users want.

As with any new endeavour, it’s a steep 

learning curve and Chorus is working 

closely with the industry, its retail service 

provider customers and CFH on the final 

installation approach. What Chorus does 

know is that it needs to be one seamless 

simple process and a positive experience 

for end users. Overseas experience shows 

that multiple truck rollouts are not only 

more costly but also result in more faults. 

P. 4

Exchange

Cabinet

2

1

KEY

Fibre

1

2

Fibre from the street joins 
home cabling at the external 
termination point (ETP)

Inside the home, fibre 
connects to an optical 
network terminal (ONT)

Making a difference to rural communities

Chorus and Vodafone continue to work together to deliver the Government’s RBI programme. This joint project  
is bringing better broadband to rural schools, health providers and tens of thousands of rural residents. It will also  
help rural businesses access the communications technology they need to drive business innovation and efficiencies.  
For rural communities, RBI will help enable them to access services currently only available to their urban counterparts. 

There are several elements to this 

In addition, Chorus will deliver fibre to  

more schools, hospitals, integrated family 

new broadband cabinets that will  

Government subsidised project. The main 

154 new Vodafone mobile sites that will  

health centres and now libraries as part  

serve approximately 1,040 schools and  

task for Chorus is laying fibre, often to 

be used to deliver fixed wireless broadband 

of phase two of RBI.

exchange areas where there isn’t fibre 

to rural communities.

today. Chorus is making the most of the 

opportunity this brings to future-proof  

the network.

Chorus was also selected, in April this year, 

approximately 3,350km of fibre and 

to help extend the reach of fibre to many 

upgrading or installing about 1,000 

As part of RBI Chorus is laying 

3

1

2

50 hospitals and family health centres.  

In addition, Chorus is working in some 

areas of the rural community to promote 

the benefits of better broadband and 

encourage local businesses to connect. 

With RBI funded fibre and wireless 

components available on an equivalent 

basis to retail service providers, rural  

New Zealanders will potentially be  

offered greater choice in the future.

KEY

Fibre

Copper

1

2

3

100Mbps+ services to rural schools

Enhanced rural fixed line broadband  
>5Mbps to 57%  
>10Mbps to 50%  
>20Mbps to 34%

~1,000 rural cabinets upgraded or 
installed for fixed line broadband.

A new industry landscape not just for Chorus 
but for New Zealand 

The structural separation of Chorus as the organisation that looks after an open access network infrastructure and Telecom 
as a retail provider of products and services, is a substantial shift in New Zealand’s telecommunications landscape. 

This significant change, where the 

As the largest copper and fibre network 

•	 Open	Access	Deeds	of	Undertakings. 

Chorus does face some competition from 

underlying fixed line communications 

operator in New Zealand, Chorus is 

These three deeds govern the way 

other telecommunications infrastructure 

infrastructure is available to everyone on 

subject to regulation. This includes:

Chorus provides copper, fibre and RBI 

providers. This includes UFB Local Fibre 

a level playing field, requires a new way 

of thinking for the telecommunications 

industry. It changes the investment 

choices and competitive dynamics for 

companies like Telecom, TelstraClear, 

Vodafone, Orcon, CallPlus and many 

other retail service providers. 

Going beyond the telecommunications 

industry, the move to a fibre network also 

compels the wider business community 

and other sectors – education, health, 

tourism, agriculture, etc – to consider  

a change to the way they operate and 

hopefully realise the productivity gains  

a fibre optic network can enable. 

•	 Regulation	of	copper	services.  

Under the Telecommunications Act 

services on an open access (non-

Companies and other fibre network 

discriminatory and equivalent) basis;

operators, such as TelstraClear, Vector, 

2001, the Commerce Commission 

•	 Three	line	of	business	restrictions. 

(Commission) can determine price  

These are designed to prevent Chorus 

and non-price terms for a number  

from operating in the retail market; and

of copper-based services, including 

UCLL, SLU, UBA and UCLFS (see P.6  

for more about Chorus’ products  

and services). The Commission also 

has the ability to recommend to the 

Minister of Communications that new 

products and services are regulated;

•	 Telecommunications	Service	

Obligation	(TSO). The mechanism 

for universal service obligations 

for residential, local access and 

calling services. Chorus is required 

to maintain lines and coverage 

obligations and provide a voice  

input service to Telecom.

FX Networks and Kordia. Chorus remains 

subject to competition and other laws, 

such as the Commerce Act 1986 and  

Fair Trading Act 1986.

Chorus continues to manage a portfolio 

of regulated and commercial services, 

both at the access network and the 

bitstream service level, and remains 

committed to delivering these services to 

all its customers on an open access basis. 

Demerger and UFB create opportunities 

Ensuring a smooth transition through 

New retail service providers are keen  

layer 1 and layer 2 services. Chorus has 

last four years, it’s not surprising that 

demerger for retail service providers  

to do business with Chorus, with its  

been working with retail service providers 

Chorus’ retail service provider customers 

was pivotal to success for Chorus.  

new business development sales pipeline 

around what the shift to fibre means for 

are heavily focused on return on invested 

It worked hard to achieve this and with  

increasing month by month. By the end  

them and their end user customers, and 

capital. Everyone is acutely aware that the 

the transition phase largely complete, 

of June 2012, Chorus was working 

helping them with their business case for 

telecommunications market is static at a 

Chorus is now focused on building retail 

actively with around 30 potential new 

fibre by utilising analysis of local market 

connections and revenue level (at around 

service provider customer relationships 

retail service providers. 

and global trends.

and taking advantage of the significant 

opportunities separation presents for 

Chorus and retail service providers.

Chorus’ customer base is mainly made  

Given the $5.5 billion* of investment in 

up of retail service providers that buy both 

the telecommunications market in the 

$4.9 billion* annually). While Chorus sees 

there is still opportunity for growth in 

broadband, the area of greatest potential  

is, of course, the transition to fibre.

* Source: Commerce Commission Annual Telecommunications Monitoring report 2011, May 2012.

P. 5

Developing new products for a new era

While copper products are core to Chorus’ portfolio today, Chorus’ success and future growth requires an innovative 
approach to product and service development that responds to the transition from copper to a new fibre world.  
Chorus is working closely with retail service providers and the wider industry on development of these new services. 

Key Chorus products and services include: 

end users a premium offering that 

providers need the ability to develop 

•	 High	Speed	Network	Services	(HSNS)	

•	 Basic	copper	products. Today’s 

existing phone and internet services 

delivered over the copper network. 

They include services such as:

•	 Basic	Unbundled	Bitstream	Access	

(UBA), which allows retail service 

providers to offer own-branded 

internet-grade broadband services 

over DSL access lines.

•	 Unbundled	Copper	Local	Loop	

(UCLL), Sub Loop UCLL (SLU) and 

Sub-Loop Extension Service (SLES) 

enabling retail service providers 

to connect Chorus access lines 

to their own broadband and voice 

equipment to deliver services to 

their end users.

•	 Enhanced	copper	products. These 

provide a stepping stone to next 

generation fibre offerings, giving  

gets the best performance from the 

and deliver unique product offerings 

Premium. A fibre-based access 

existing network. This is ideal for 

for their end user customers swiftly 

service for business end users with 

services that need more bandwidth  

and cost effectively. The new, dynamic 

large data requirements.

or higher service levels than basic 

Chorus co-innovation framework 

copper products. The products 

allows them to work directly with 

have an important role to play in 

Chorus product and technology 

the migration to fibre and for those 

experts to create, prototype, test  

areas that come later in the UFB build 

and perfect new products in a 

programme. Services include:

collaborative environment. Fibre 

products include:

•	 Field	services. Chorus has around 

2,000 field technicians who work on 

its behalf, providing installation and 

similar services to end users. These 

services are increasingly important as 

New Zealanders prepare their homes 

and businesses for using fibre services.

•	 Enhanced	UBA	offers	the	option	 
of a real-time channel dedicated  

for voice simultaneously with a  

best-efforts internet service.

•	 Wholesale	VDSL2	Service	utilises	

third generation DSL technology 

that delivers significantly faster 

broadband for short copper  

loop lengths.

•  Fibre	products. Chorus is working 

with retail service providers to develop 

fibre access products. Retail service 

•	 Next	Generation	Access	(NGA).	

Services delivered as part of the 

•	

Infrastructure	services. These provide 
the backbone network carrier services 

UFB initiative to provide phone and 

broadband services to residential 

end users. NGA includes building 

blocks such as Baseband, which 

enables the delivery of a basic 

voice service, and can be provided 

standalone as well as with a 

broadband solution.

for retail service providers with their 

own networks, so they can connect 

and interact with the Chorus network. 

In addition to these products and services, 

Chorus acts as an agent for Telecom, 

selling wholesale products such as PSTN 

and Centrex lines on its behalf.

Everyone plays a part

Think national, act local

The team spirit inherent in the name ‘Chorus’ has been very much in evidence as 

While Chorus has a significant national role in building and maintaining a 

teams have come together and new people come on board, with the Chorus team 

telecommunications network across the country, it is firmly grounded in local 

growing from 275 people in a Telecom business unit to over 500 people in Chorus  

communities. This is where its people live and work and where its infrastructure is  

as a standalone listed company at the end of the financial year. 

part of the physical landscape – the copper and fibre cables in the ground, the cabinets  

Chorus has worked to create a new culture and values that reflect its people and 

on the verge and the Chorus vans driving around the neighbourhood. 

business for the years ahead. It is delighted to have achieved 85% engagement in  

Chorus believes it’s vital to work closely with local government and community groups 

its first people survey, giving Chorus confidence that it’s on track to achieve the aim  

to ensure that the network infrastructure is part of the neighbourhood it serves. This 

of all its people believing Chorus is the best place they’ve ever worked. In addition, 

means keeping the lines of communication open in more ways than one. For example, 

just six months after separation, Chorus was awarded Best Employer Accreditation  

keeping local residents informed through community advertising, letters and local 

in Aon Hewitt’s Best Employer Australia and New Zealand Accreditation Programme.  

information evenings. Chorus has got a job to do, of course, and there are a lot of 

It was one of just 14 employers across both countries to gain this accreditation.

practical considerations, but it works with residents wherever possible to ensure the  

Chorus values were built by its people. Every employee participated in personal  

best outcome for everyone. 

values workshops contributing their views and ideas about the sort of place they 

Chorus is always ready to listen to residents’ concerns. Recognising that graffiti is a 

wanted to work in. Chorus values are an articulation of the values offered at those 

community issue, Chorus is doing its part to tackle this head on by getting together with 

workshops. Chorus also makes considerable investment in psychometrics and 

some community groups and councils to have local artists transform roadside cabinets 

workshops that help its people to understand themselves and each other better  

that have suffered regular abuse from taggers into community works of art. 

as they build a high-performing company.

Chorus has had, and continues to have, a long-term view of its impact in the community 

Chorus is also dedicated to ensuring that everyone understands how they personally 

and on the environment. Reporting on a new sustainability strategy is currently being put 

contribute to the organisation’s performance. Individual annual performance plans  

in place. 

are developed following ‘line of sight’ sessions, which enable Chorus people to 

understand how what they do on a day to day basis links to Chorus’ goals and  

longer-term strategies. As well as enabling Chorus people to focus on those things 

that will have an impact on Chorus’ success and shareholder outcomes, it enables 

them to be involved in meaningful work, which is so critical to a sense of engagement.

The Canterbury earthquakes reminded all New Zealanders of the vulnerability and 

importance of key infrastructure that connects them to friends and family, and keeps 

businesses going. Chorus is conscious of its critical role in keeping New Zealand online 

following natural disasters. It has established a reputation as a company that retail 

service providers and communities can depend on to go the extra mile and Chorus 

works with Civil Defence to ensure it is ready to play its part should the need arise.

P. 6

Management Commentary
& Financial Statements

Financial Highlights - For the seven months ended 30 June 2012

EBITDA

$399m

Earnings before interest, income tax, depreciation and amortisation 

Contents

Management Commentary

Overview of the telecommunications wholesale market 
Revenue commentary 
Expenditure commentary 
Statement of financial position commentary    
Cash flow commentary 
Capital expenditure commentary 
Long term capital management 
Competition, regulation and litigation 
Other regulatory matters 

F.3
F.4
F.5
F.7
F.7
F.8
F.9
F.10
F.11 

Financial Statements

Independent auditors report 
Income statement 
Statement of comprehensive income 
Statement of financial position 
Statement of changes in equity 
Statement of cash flow 
Notes to the financial statements 

F.13
F.13
F.13
F.14
F.14
F.15
F.16-F.30

Dividend

14.6

Cents per share (see page F.3 for details)

Capital expenditure

$346m

Fixed line connections

Broadband connections

1,776,000 

1,040,000 

Fibre connections

10,000 

Increase over seven months

50,000

Staff engagement

85% 

Aon Hewitt, Best Employers  
2012 Accreditation

 
 
 
F. 2

Management  
Commentary

Chorus reports earnings before interest, income tax, depreciation and 
amortisation (EBITDA) of $399 million for the seven months ending  
30 June 2012. After adjusting for $11 million of insurance proceeds from 
the Canterbury earthquakes, the underlying EBITDA of $388 million is 
described by Chief Executive Officer Mark Ratcliffe as “a pleasing start  
to our operations as a standalone business.”

Operating revenue

Operating expenses

Earnings before interest, income tax, depreciation and amortisation

Depreciation and amortisation

Earnings before interest and income tax

Net interest expense

Net earnings before income tax

Income tax expense

Net earnings for the period

EBITDA

Less: insurance proceeds

Underlying EBITDA

2012
(7	monThs)
$m

613 

(214)

399

(189)

210

(68)

142

(40)

102

399

(11)

388

In summary

•	 Chorus	will	pay	a	prorated	

dividend for the seven months 
ending 30 June 2012 of 14.6 
cents per share in line with the 
demerger scheme booklet.

•	 Chorus	achieved	solid	EBITDA	for	
the seven months ending 30 June 
2012 of $399 million.

•	 Gross	capital	expenditure	for	the	
seven months was $346 million, 
with satisfactory progress made 
on both the Rural Broadband 
Initiative (RBI) and the Ultra 
Fast Broadband (UFB) network 
deployment programmes.

•	 Demand	for	fixed	broadband	

continued to grow steadily with 
about 50,000 connections added 
over the seven months, for a total 
of 1,040,000 connections.

•	 The	regulatory	environment	
remains uncertain with the 
Commerce Commission yet to 
finalise pending reviews for prices 
for Unbundled Copper Local Loop 
(UCLL) and Unbundled Bitstream 
Access (UBA), which could have 
potential implications for other 
key regulated copper services. 

Chorus Management CommentaryDividends

Capital expenditure

Overview of the 
telecommunications 
wholesale market

Chorus will pay a prorated dividend of 14.6 cents per share  

Capital expenditure for the seven months ended 30 June 2012 was 

Chorus is New Zealand’s largest telecommunications infrastructure 

Over the next three years Chorus anticipates: 

on 5 October 2012 to all holders registered at 5.00pm Friday  

$346 million. Almost 80% of this expenditure was focused on fibre 

provider, supplying about 90% of all fixed network connections to 

21 September 2012. The shares will be quoted on an ex-dividend 

related investment, principally on the UFB and RBI deployment 

retail service providers. Chorus has business line restrictions that 

basis from 19 September 2012 on the NZSX and 17 September 2012 

programmes. The programmes are a key focus for Chorus because 

include a prohibition on selling directly to end users. The wholesale 

on the ASX. 

they represent investment in future network capability and are also 

market is characterised by steady, but slightly declining, fixed line 

•   Retail service provider consolidation and increasing 

competition: retail service providers will reposition themselves  

to capitalise on the new wholesale network structure.

extending the reach of the network. Chorus is working with the 

connections for voice. Chorus’ total of approximately 1,776,000 fixed 

•  Strong focus by retail service providers on cost control and 

Crown to deliver each programme and has an agreed deployment 

line connections at 30 June 2012 is slightly less than twelve months 

productivity benefits: New Zealand telecommunications  

The dividends paid will be fully imputed (at a ratio of 28/72) in line 

with the corporate income tax rate. In addition, a supplementary 

dividend of 2.5765 cents per share will be payable to shareholders 

who are not resident in New Zealand.

schedule that is being worked to. 

Regulatory environment 

Chorus expects to pay a fully imputed dividend of 25.5 cents per 

Chorus’ UFB services and pricing are set by the UFB contract  

share in FY13, subject to there being no material adverse changes  

until the end of 2019. The majority of Chorus’ non-UFB services  

in circumstances or operating outlook. An interim dividend is 

are regulated by the Commerce Commission (Commission).  

expected to be paid in April 2013 and a final dividend is expected  

The Commission is currently reviewing prices for Chorus’ UCLL  

ago, and reflects the slow migration of fixed voice services to mobile 

retail revenues are flat to declining, with growth in broadband, 

in New Zealand relative to other countries. With the strong growth  

Internet Protocol (IP) and mobile services offset by declines in 

in mobile smart devices, fixed networks globally are increasingly seen 

traditional voice. 

as complementary to supporting the mobile experience.

•  Regulatory influence on decision making: regulated pricing  

New Zealand’s broadband market continues to grow steadily, with 

will likely be a strong influence on Chorus’ future revenues,  

Chorus adding about 50,000 connections in the seven months. 

retail service provider investment incentives in copper or fibre  

and industry willingness to migrate to fibre. 

to be paid in October 2013, on an estimated 40/60 split basis,  

and UBA services and there could be potential implications for  

In 2011, New Zealand ranked as the fourth fastest growing broadband 

subject to there being no material adverse changes in circumstances 

other services. 

or operating outlook.

The Commission issued a draft decision in May 2012 on UCLL 

Given the current regulatory uncertainty, Chorus is unable to provide 

and issued a further discussion paper on 17 August 2012, with a 

longer term dividend guidance. Without that regulatory uncertainty, 

conference to follow in September 2012. The review is expected 

the Board expects Chorus would have been able to announce 

to be concluded in November 2012 and may reset the reviewed 

market in the OECD, with total broadband connections increasing 

8% to 1,175,000. Broadband penetration per 100 inhabitants is 

•  Strong growth in mobile devices and associated bandwidth 
demand: this will drive demand for high definition video and 

27%, ahead of both the OECD average (26%) and Australia (23%). 

cloud based services within the home, supporting fibre adoption. 

New Zealand also now has the highest level of OECD broadband 
penetration relative to GDP1.

•   Renewed business demand for fibre: lower UFB based fibre 

pricing and improved coverage will stimulate business demand, 

a dividend policy consistent with modest long term dividend 

de-averaged UCLL prices and, to apply from 2014, an averaged 

In the seven months since its establishment as a standalone business, 

particularly in the small to mid sized business market.

growth from an annual dividend of 25 cents per share, subject to 

UCLL price. The review process has raised substantial questions and 

Chorus has focused on pioneering a new industry and global model 

the standard caveat of there being no material adverse change in 

circumstances or operating outlook.

uncertainty as to the pricing of related services, namely Unbundled 
Copper Low Frequency Service (UCLFS) and the pricing of the Sub 

featuring public private partnerships and open access wholesale 

services. It is a period of complex industry transition, representing 

Loop UCLL (SLU) service and impacts arising from changes. Chorus 

both opportunity and challenge for Chorus, as well as for retail 

is continuing to actively engage with the Commission through the 

service providers. An open access network, together with the roll 

consultation process with particular focus on the alignment of the 

out of fibre to 75% of New Zealanders, is likely to influence further 

regulatory decision making with the policy settings and legislative 

change in the industry. This change includes increasing the focus  

amendments accompanying UFB, the demerger of Chorus and 

on services competition, consolidation of retail service providers (as 

potential implications for migration from copper to fibre. 

already seen in the proposed purchase of TelstraClear by Vodafone) 

Other networks

Chorus’ network competitors include TelstraClear, Vector, FX Networks, 

Kordia and a range of regionally based fixed wireless network 

providers such as Woosh, CallPlus and Now (formerly Airnet). 

TelstraClear is a significant Chorus customer but is also Chorus’ 

largest network competitor operating a cable network in Wellington, 
Kapiti and Christchurch, with about 60,000 broadband customers2.  
It also has business fibre networks in all major central business areas 

There are a number of additional costs associated with running a 

There is no certainty in relation to the outcomes of the pending 

standalone business in addition to the network maintenance costs, 

reviews or any future reviews that may be initiated.

provisioning expenditure and other network costs that were incurred 

by Chorus as a business unit of Telecom.

On 11 September 2012 the Commission announced a delay in its 

proposed timeline for reviewing the UBA price that comes into effect 

from 1 December 2014. It is now proposed that this determination  

be made in April 2013.

and leadership of the migration from copper to fibre.  

and a national transport and backhaul network. 

Three local fibre companies Northpower, Ultrafast Fibre and  

Enable Networks are participating in the Crown’s UFB initiative  

and have begun to deploy fibre access networks in their respective 

areas. It is expected that these local fibre companies will deploy  

UFB fibre past about 365,000 premises. Chorus expects its UFB 

network to have passed about 830,900 premises by the end of 2019.

EBITDA

EBITDA for the seven months ended 30 June 2012 was $399 million. 

This reflects the strength of underlying demand for Chorus basic and 

enhanced copper products, including steady broadband uptake over 

the period. Business fibre connections also show signs of positive 

growth, supported by the rollout of the UFB network and revised 

pricing for fibre based High Speed Network Service (HSNS).  

A significant amount of Chorus’ revenues are from regulated 

products, which gives little discretionary flexibility in revenues. 

This has resulted in a very close focus on controlling expenditure. 

F. 3

1  OECD fixed (wired) broadband subscriptions per 100 inhabitants, by technology, December 2011 

http://www.oecd.org/internet/broadbandandtelecom/broadbandportal-pressrelease-dec2011.htm

2  IDC Telecommunications Tracker Q1 2012

Chorus Management Commentary 
F. 4

Revenue commentary

Operating revenue

Basic copper

Enhanced copper

Basic copper

Enhanced copper

Fibre

Value added network services

Infrastructure

Field services

Other 

Total operating revenue

2012
(7	monThs)
$m

399

89

28

18

14

47

18

613

Revenue overview

Chorus’ focus in the past seven months has been to manage  

and mitigate the risks of service transition through demerger,  

sustain demand for connections and build relationships with  

retail service providers. Revenues and volumes have remained 

•  Enhanced copper: copper based next generation regulated and 

commercial products that deliver higher speed capability, a better 

customer experience and can assist transition to fibre. It includes 

Enhanced UBA, VDSL2, Baseband IP voice input service and  

HSNS Lite (Copper) for business data.

relatively steady throughout the seven months.

•  Fibre: includes Chorus’ existing business fibre products (such 

Chorus’ product portfolio encompasses a broad range of  

broadband, data and voice services. It includes a mix of regulated  

and commercial copper and legacy products, and contractually 

agreed fibre products. Chorus’ revenue strategy focuses on: 

•	 Retaining	value	by	sustaining	demand	for	Chorus’	share	 

of market connections;

•	 Delivering	growth	by	driving	demand	for	UFB	services	in	line	with	
the Government’s objective to maximise connections. Chorus’ 

as HSNS Premium) and new UFB residential and business fibre 

services. This category also captures UFB backhaul and Direct 

Fibre, which is the equivalent of dark fibre and can also be used  

to deliver backhaul connections to mobile sites.

•  Field services: captures all revenues generated by the field force in 
provisioning, maintaining and installing all copper and fibre products.

•  Infrastructure: services that provide access to Chorus’ network 

assets, including civil works and telecommunications exchange 

space. It also includes co-location of equipment and access  

goal is to deliver products that support bandwidth growth and 

encourage adoption of higher speed fibre products of 100Mbps  

to poles. 

or more; and 

•	 Defining	new	market	opportunities	for	Chorus’	connections	 

and services. 

Chorus’ revenue reporting categories are as follows: 

•  Basic copper: incorporates core regulated products that, while 

an important part of the portfolio, have limited scope for further 

development by Chorus, or are founded on earlier technology 

and product variants that are being superseded by enhanced 

copper and fibre services. It includes most of Chorus’ layer 1 

network products and includes the copper voice input UCLFS, 

Basic UBA including broadband only connections (naked UBA), 

UCLL, SLU and Sub Loop Extension Services (SLES). 

•  Value added network services: this captures the products and 

expertise Chorus offers to support retail service providers wanting 

to deliver higher value or specialist services, such as enhanced 

service level agreements. It also includes carrier network services, 

which provide network connectivity across backhaul links. 

•  Other: includes transitional services, agency services and other 

miscellaneous revenues.

This structure is expected to provide insight into the evolution of 

Chorus’ revenues and better reflects the way Chorus operates 

As expected, migration from Basic UBA broadband services to 

Chorus’ enhanced copper category delivered steady growth over  

enhanced copper services and a gradual shift in traditional voice 

the period, reflecting both increased migration from Basic UBA as 

volumes, as retail service providers invest in IP voice services,  

Enhanced UBA becomes the default connection choice for broadband 

is continuing and therefore basic copper revenues have been 

and a technology shift to ethernet services generally. Enhanced  

declining. The key products in basic copper include Baseband 

UBA connections were approximately 371,000 at 30 June 2012.  

Copper, Basic UBA and UCLL.

The majority of basic copper revenues are derived from Chorus’ 

Baseband Copper services (including UCLFS) which retail service 

providers can use as an input into traditional voice offers . Baseband 

Copper services have been priced at $24.46 since demerger, 

reflecting the averaged urban and non-urban UCLL price. There is 

A standard Enhanced UBA (with analogue voice) connection costs 

$21.46 although Chorus can achieve higher revenue than this when 

retail service providers offer service differentiation to their customers 

and opt for higher bandwidth capability from Chorus. There were 

also approximately 39,000 naked Enhanced UBA connections at  

30 June 2012.

some uncertainty with this price given the pending UCLL pricing 

Chorus’ commercial VDSL2 product is consumed, with low volumes 

proceedings, although there is no formal review of the UCLFS 

to date, by some retail service providers as a premium service.  

determination at present (see the competition, regulation and 

It utilises existing copper based capability and offers download speeds 

litigation section). At 30 June 2012 there were approximately 
1,585,000 Baseband Copper lines3.

of 30-50Mbps and upload speeds of up to 20Mbps, subject to an end 

user’s distance from the broadband equipment and line capability.

Basic UBA is an early variant broadband service. It is delivered  

on a ‘best efforts’ basis using older generation technology.  

Chorus had almost 619,000 Basic UBA connections at 30 June 2012. 

This reflects retail service provider systems upgrades and migration  

to the Enhanced UBA service, which starts at the same wholesale 

price as Basic UBA but provides a superior broadband experience.  

UBA pricing was set on a retail minus basis prior to demerger and  

has been frozen at $21.46 per connection until December 2014.  

The Commission has recently rescheduled its determination  

of a cost based pricing approach for UBA services to April 2013  

(see the competition, regulation and litigation section).

Chorus had 11,000 naked Basic UBA connections at 30 June 2012. 

This product provides broadband services only (no voice service) 

and its $45.92 price is subject to change as part of the Commission’s 

review of UCLL pricing (see the competition, regulation and  

litigation section).

Fibre

Chorus is dedicated to driving growth in high speed fibre and working 

with retail service providers to transition to fibre services. Fibre is  

in the very early stages of deployment and therefore adoption.  

Chorus’ current focus is on educating retail service providers and 

New Zealanders about the benefits of fibre, supporting fibre trials  

and removing barriers to bandwidth growth. 

Chorus already has a large business fibre footprint that has traditionally 

been used to deliver premium point-to-point fibre connectivity to 
large businesses. In September 2011 Chorus reduced the price of 

HSNS Premium, a high grade business fibre service (also referred to 

as Bitstream 4 under the UFB agreement) to bring it into line with 

contracted UFB pricing. Repricing HSNS Premium to $380 per month 

for up to 100Mbps has driven new demand with the number of HSNS 

Premium connections almost doubling between 1 December 2011  

and 30 June 2012. Chorus estimates that it provides fibre connections 

As at 30 June 2012, approximately 116,000 access lines were being 

to approximately 50% of the business fibre market. 

used by retail service providers to deliver unbundled services to 

consumers. The total comprised 97,000 UCLL lines and 19,000 SLU 

lines (offered in conjunction with Chorus’ commercial SLES) from  

156 unbundled exchanges. UCLL lines are currently charged at 

$19.84 for urban and $36.63 for non-urban. The price moves to an 

averaged price in 2014 and was set at $24.46 in November 2011.  

The UCLL prices are currently under further review by the Commission 

Chorus had total fibre connections of approximately 10,000 at  

30 June 2012, comprising a range of business, residential and  

other network connections. This includes the layer 1 fibre product 

Bandwidth Fibre and Direct Fibre Access, although the number  

of these connections is not large.

The rollout of the UFB network has been prioritised to provide 

connectivity for businesses, schools and hospitals by 2015 in 

accordance with the UFB policy and agreement. This will make HSNS 

Premium and other business capable services more widely available. 

The number of UFB connections provided during the seven months 

to 30 June 2012 was naturally small given the very early stages of the 

deployment that will continue until 2019. 

3  For billing purposes, this total includes instances where UCLFS is sold with UBA connections. Although the UCLFS Standard Terms Determination contemplates 
such connections as naked UBA connections, the price outcome is the same as if these connections were billed for naked UBA and zero for UCLFS/Baseband.

relative to the revenue categories contained in the scheme booklet.

(see the competition, regulation and litigation section). 

Chorus Management CommentaryValue added network services

Field services

Operating expenses 

Expenditure commentary

The main revenue driver for this category is carrier network  

This category includes work performed by service company 

services, which provide network connectivity across backhaul links. 

technicians providing new services, maintaining customer networks, 

The nature of these services means volumes and revenues in this 

relocating Chorus’ network on request and chargeable cable location 

category were largely unchanged. 

Infrastructure

Chorus provides commercial access to its exchanges, poles and 

other infrastructure. Co-location revenue derives from retail service 

providers and other network operators installing their equipment  

in Chorus exchanges, as well as leased commercial space in 

services. As Chorus utilises service companies to perform the  

field services’ work, there is a direct cost associated with all field 

services revenues.

Provisioning revenues are generally based on customer orders for 

technicians to install new services and are driven by the number  

and nature of customer orders, and the type of work required. 

exchange buildings. Unbundling (UCLL) has been the primary  

Maintenance revenues are generated when faults are proven  

driver of co-location revenues to date. 

to be on the retail service provider’s rather than Chorus’  

The infrastructure category delivered continued growth over the 

seven month period, primarily through demand driven by growth in 

UCLL, new market entrants and demand for handover links to national 

network, and are driven by the number of reported faults and 

proactive maintenance programmes performed on behalf  

of retail service providers. 

backhaul providers as retail service providers prepared for UFB. 

These revenues also include costs recovered for damage  

to Chorus’ network by third parties.

Other

This category includes revenues from the resale of Telecom’s 

Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) and voice related  

services, as well as one off type revenue items and proceeds  

from the disposal of surplus copper. 

Chorus summary connection facts 

Total fixed line connections

Baseband copper

UCLL

SLU/SLES

Fibre

Naked Basic UBA and Enhanced UBA

Legacy data services over copper

Total broadband

Basic UBA (with analogue voice service)

Naked Basic UBA

Enhanced UBA (with analogue voice service)

Naked Enhanced UBA

F. 5

ConnECTIons
(30	JunE	2012)

1,776,000

1,585,000

97,000

19,000

10,000

50,000

15,000

1,040,000

619,000

11,000

371,000

39,000

Labour costs

Provisioning

Network maintenance

Other network costs

Information technology costs

Rent and rates

Property maintenance

Electricity

Insurance

Consultants

Other 

Total operating expenses

2012
(7	monThs)
$m

31

23

52

22

30

6

8

11

3

5

23

214

Labour costs of $31 million represent staff costs that are not capitalised. 

by the number of retail service provider reported faults, the type of 

As at 30 June 2012, Chorus employed 548 permanent and fixed term 

work required to fix the faults and the extent of Chorus’ proactive 

employees (532 full time equivalent positions). This compares with 

maintenance programme. The level, type and cost of faults is 

scheme booklet employee estimates of 470-540 full time equivalents.

affected by factors such as rainfall, lightning, network degradation, 

During FY13 Chorus will transition approximately 100 more customer 

service staff in house from Telecom where they currently perform 

fulfil, assure and billing functions for Chorus. Telecom currently 

labour costs, material costs and network growth. Chorus manages  

its maintenance plans with the objective of an overall net reduction  

in the volume of faults and related network maintenance costs.

provides these functions to Chorus through a transitional service 

Other network costs relate to costs associated with service partner 

agreement and charges Chorus the operating costs. This people 

contract costs, engineering services and the cost of network spares. 

transition is a continuation of the demerger process and reflects 

Chorus’ focus on increased self sufficiency. The cost outcome  

is expected to be largely neutral.

Provisioning costs are incurred where Chorus provides new or 

changed service to retail service providers. A proportion of these 

costs also result in revenue. The total provisioning cost is driven 

by the volume of orders, the type of work required to fulfil them, 

technician labour, material and overhead costs. Chorus is continually 

working to optimise provisioning activity and this may translate  

to higher field services revenues, and/or reduced costs, depending 

on the level of retail service provider demand.

Network maintenance costs relate to fixing network faults and any 

operational expenditure arising from the proactive maintenance 

programme. Where faults are on a retail service provider’s network 

(rather than Chorus’ network) Chorus charges the retail service 

provider for this service. Network maintenance costs are driven  

Information technology costs of $30 million represent the costs paid 

directly by Chorus to third party vendors, as well as the operating 

expenditure component of systems currently shared with Telecom.

Rent and rates, property maintenance, electricity and insurance 

costs relate to the operation of Chorus’ network estate (for example, 

exchanges, radio sites and roadside cabinets). The principal cost  

is electricity, used to operate the network electronics, and this  

is dependent on the number of sites, electricity consumption  

and electricity prices. Electricity prices have been higher than 

historical averages.

‘Other’ includes expenditure incurred by Chorus for shared services 

provided by Telecom, together with general costs such as advertising, 

travel, training and legal fees.

Chorus Management CommentaryF. 6

Depreciation and amortisation

Net interest expense

2012
(7	monThs)
$m

EsTImATED	
USEFUL LIFE
(yEArs)

WEIGhTED
AvErAGE	 
USEFUL LIFE
(yEArs)

41

13

7

15

8

62

5

(1)

150

39

39

Depreciation

Copper cables

Fibre cables

Ducts and manholes

Cabinets

Property

Network electronics

Other

Less: Crown funding

Total depreciation

Amortisation

Software and other intangibles

Total amortisation

The weighted average useful life represents the useful life  

in each category weighted by the net book value of the assets. 

The capital spend in the current year as a result of the RBI and  

UFB rollout predominantly relates to long dated asset categories  

(for example, copper cables, fibre cables, ducts and manholes). 

Chorus expects the depreciation profile to shift to long dated assets 

as the UFB and RBI rollout progresses. The Crown funding release 

against depreciation is also expected to increase over time as 

additional call notices are issued and funding is received from  

the Crown, with the associated amortisation to depreciation 

increasing accordingly.

10 - 20

20

50

5 - 14

5 - 50

2 - 14

2 - 15

20

20

50

10

18

9

6

Interest income

Interest expense

Interest on syndicated bank facility

Interest on EMTN

Other interest expense

Capitalised interest

Total interest expenses excluding CFH Securities

CFH securities (notional interest) 

Total interest expense

Net interest expense

2 - 20

5

At a minimum, Chorus aims to maintain 50 percent of its debt 

Taxation

2012
(7	monThs)
$m

(4)

32

27

16

(3)

72

-

72

68

The 2012 effective tax rate of 28% equates to the statutory rate  

of 28%. There are no material differences between net earnings 

before income tax and what is, or will be, taxable for the period  

to 30 June 2012. 

obligations at a fixed rate of interest. It has fully hedged the foreign 

exchange exposure on the Euro Medium Term Note (EMTN) 

with cross currency interest rate swaps. The floating interest on 

these derivatives has been fully hedged using interest rate swap 

instruments. The exposure to floating rate interest on the syndicated 

bank facility has been reduced using interest rate swaps. 

As at 30 June 2012, approximately 70 percent of the outstanding 

debt obligation was fixed at an effective rate of 5.77% through 

derivative or fixed rate debt arrangements. 

Other interest expense includes finance lease interest of $9 million  

and a non-cash charge of $7 million. The non-cash charge reflects  

the mark to market impact of the unhedged debt position from  

1 December 2011 to 14 February 2012. The debt was entered into  

a hedge relationship on 14 February 2012. While the hedge remains 

effective any future gains or losses will be processed through the 

hedge reserve. 

Chorus Management CommentaryStatement of financial position commentary

Cash flow commentary

Current assets

Non-current assets

Total assets

Current liabilities 

Non-current liabilities

Total liabilities

Equity

Total liabilities and equity

See pages F13-F30 for detailed disclosure of the above line items.

Current liabilities

1 DECEMBER  
2011
$m

30 jUNE  
2012
$m

80

2,436

2,516

69

2,012

2,081

435

2,516

341

2,593

2,934

344

2,063

2,407

527

2,934

Cash flows from operating activities

Cash flows applied to investing activities

Cash flows from financing activities

Net movement in cash

2012
(7	monThs)
$m

332

(259)

27

100

See pages F13-F30 for detailed disclosure of the above line items.

Cash flows applied to investing activities

The net movement in cash fairly reflects the movements in cash 

balance over the seven months to 30 June 2012. However, 

consideration must be made of the minimal working capital  

balances transferred to Chorus on demerger and that Chorus hasn’t 

A total of $256 million in cash was invested in network assets  

and software, related mostly to the RBI and UFB rollouts.

Cash flows from financing activities

paid a dividend during the last seven months. This is also the reason 

Net cash received from financing activities was $27 million.  

capital expenditure and investing activities do not reconcile in the 

This was mostly represented by Crown funding of $13 million from 

At demerger the majority of trade and other payables remained 

with Telecom. Trade and other payables has increased to normal 

usual manner.

operational levels from an artificially low base. The year end balance 

Cash flows from operating activities

CFH, albeit Chorus had completed the build work for approximately 

42,000 premises. There is a time lag between the completion of  

the UFB build work in a specified area, CFH testing and certification 

Net cash from operating activities is $332 million. This is largely made 

and final receipt by Chorus of the CFH funding.

up of $530 million in cash received from customers, which was used 

to pay salaries and suppliers ($147 million), income tax ($20 million)  

and interest on debt ($35 million).

During the seven month period $51 million of debt was drawn  

down and then subsequently repaid. 

Current assets

The increase in current assets since Chorus’ demerger is driven 

predominantly by an increase in cash reserves and trade and other 

receivables. Cash reserves increased by $100 million as a result  

of the positive financial performance over the seven month period.  

largely consists of capital expenditure payables relating to the  

RBI and UFB rollout programmes ($90 million).

The majority of trade and other receivables remained with Telecom 

Non-current liabilities 

The minor increase in non-current liabilities reflects Crown funding 

received for grantable costs attributable to the relevant milestones 

for deploying the rural link or rural cabinets.

at demerger, with the increase at the end of the period the result  

of normal operations and settlement terms from an artificially  

low starting base.

Non-current assets

The increase in non-current assets is due largely to Chorus’ 

investment in the RBI and UFB rollout programmes. As these 

programmes progressed, the costs associated with fibre capital 

spend (for example, trenching, laying ducts and fibre cables) were 

capitalised against the network assets categories of fibre cables  

($75 million) and ducts and manholes ($86 million).

F. 7

Chorus Management Commentary 
F. 8

Capital expenditure commentary

Fibre

Copper

Common 

Gross capital expenditure

2012
(7	monThs)
$m

274

49

23

346

Capital expenditure of $33 million on other fibre connections  

is to deploy network duct and fibre (largely grant funded, see 

and growth reflects demand for business fibre connections,  

contributions to capital expenditure section below) to connect 

new ‘greenfield’ fibre subdivisions, fibre lifecycle investment and 

schools, hospitals, wireless broadband towers and other priority 

regional backhaul connections for retail service provider data  

users in rural areas. Chorus is also deploying cabinets and cabinet 

traffic. Chorus expects to see a transition over time between this 

electronics to expand its broadband footprint as part of the phase 1 

category and UFB related capital expenditure as the UFB network 

initiative. The programme is expected to cost around $280 - $295 

footprint grows.

million, with the majority of spending scheduled early in  

The RBI is a five year programme of work that commenced in  

July 2011 in conjunction with Vodafone. Chorus’ role in the initiative 

the programme.

Chorus has divided capital expenditure into three categories,  

•	 ‘Common’	includes	a	range	of	spend	unrelated	to	network	 

which reflects the major build programmes: 

asset classes, such as Chorus’ enterprise systems, buildings  

•	 ‘Fibre’	includes	spend	specifically	focused	on	fibre	assets	 

(layer 0 and layer 1 UFB network assets) to support the fibre  
network (IT delivering fibre products) and programmes largely 

focused on fibre (UFB and RBI). 

•	 ‘Copper’	includes	spend	on	copper	related	network	assets	 

and supporting capability (such as layer 2 electronics). 

Fibre capital expenditure 

UFB communal

Fibre layer 2

Fibre products and systems

Other fibre connections and growth

RBI

Total fibre capital expenditure

and office equipment. 

Copper capital expenditure 

Gross capital expenditure for the seven months to 30 June 2012  

was $346 million, which is within the guidance range of $335 to  

$355 million.

Network sustain

Copper connections

Copper layer 2

Product fixed

Total copper capital expenditure

2012
(7	monThs)
$m

20

14

12

3

49

2012
(7	monThs)
$m

162

13

7

33

59

274

Network sustain refers to capital expenditure where the network is 
being upgraded or network elements, such as poles, cabinets and 

Copper layer 2 reflects investment in network electronics and 

equipment as a consequence of demand for broadband capacity  

cables are replaced. This is typically where there is risk of network 

and growth. This is expected to reduce slowly over time in line with 

failure or degraded service for customers and network replacement 

the UFB network rollout and uptake.

is deemed more cost effective than reactive maintenance.

Capital expenditure on ‘Product fixed’ is largely driven by retail  

Capital expenditure on copper connections occurs where there 

service provider demand for new copper related products. 

is demand for copper connections for residential or business 

customers, such as infill housing or new buildings. It is expected that 

demand for copper connections will decrease over time as the UFB 

network footprint expands and demand for fibre connections grows.

Fibre capital expenditure is the largest component of Chorus’ 

seven months as a standalone business and $162 million was  

gross capital expenditure spend due to the scale of the UFB build 

spent on the UFB communal network, with $122 million spent  

programme. Chorus has estimated that it will cost $1.4 - $1.6 billion 

on completed premises, $30 million on year 1 work in progress  

to build the communal UFB network by the end of 2019.

and $10 million on work in progress for year 2 deployment. 

Chorus commenced building the UFB communal network in August 

Layer 2 capital expenditure was a relatively modest $13 million 

2011 and by 30 June 2012 had built the fibre network past about 

because of the early stage of the rollout. 

42,000 premises, with thousands more close to completion.  

The rollout progress meant that about 57,000 end users were  

able to connect to Chorus’ growing UFB network at 30 June 2012. 

The build programme has ramped up significantly during Chorus’ 

Investment in fibre related products and systems development  

was $7 million. 

Chorus Management Commentary 
 
 
Common capital expenditure

Information technology

Building and engineering services

Other

Total common capital expenditure

Long term capital management

2012
(7	monThs)
$m

12

10

1

23

Chorus’ principal source of liquidity is operating cash flows and 

policies are designed to ensure that this objective is met in expected 

external borrowing from established debt programmes, such as 

operating circumstances. It is Chorus’ intention that in normal 

the EMTN and bank facilities. Chorus also issues debt and equity 

circumstances the ratio of net debt to EBITDA will not materially 

securities to CFH as it completes relevant milestones. It also receives 

exceed 3.5 times (net debt includes the senior portion of CFH debt 

grants from the Crown in relation to its RBI build programme.

securities and net lease obligations).

The Chorus Board is committed to maintaining a ‘BBB’ long term 

At 30 June 2012, Chorus had a long term credit rating of BBB/stable 

credit rating from Standard & Poor’s and a ‘Baa2’ long term credit 

by Standard & Poor’s and Baa2/stable by Moody’s Investors Service.

rating from Moody’s Investors Service. Chorus’ capital management 

Chorus made a $12 million investment in information technology 

Building and engineering services reflects the capital spend 

systems during the seven months to 30 June 2012. This spend  

on growth and plant replacement (for example, power and air 

largely relates to changes required to existing systems as a result of 

conditioning) at Chorus exchanges, buildings and remote sites.

the demerger. As part of the demerger Chorus is required to submit  

a plan to the Minister of Communications and Information 

Technology by December 2012 outlining how it will transition off 

prescribed Telecom information technology systems. The plan will be 

updated annually. One of the first systems to be transitioned will be 

the enterprise system, which must be separate by 30 June 2014. 

‘Other’ includes items such as office accommodation and equipment.

Contributions to capital expenditure 

Chorus receives significant financing and contributions towards  

ii) Other: Chorus is able to recover the cost of other capital spend 

its gross capital expenditure each year. During the seven months  

in certain circumstances. This includes replacing network damaged 

to 30 June 2012, Chorus received contributions from the  

by third parties or instances where central or local government 

following sources:

i) RBI funding: The Crown is contributing grant funding of about 

$236 million towards Chorus’ layer 0 and layer 1 capital spend over 

the five year Rural Broadband Initiative. The grant is payable on 

completion of build work and will vary each year, subject to the 

agreed build programme and the grantable network that is built.  

For the seven months to 30 June 2012, $18 million was received.

authorities ask Chorus to relocate or rebuild existing network.  

A total of $3 million was received in the current financial period  

and is included as part of Crown funding, given its modest size.

F. 9

Chorus Management Commentary 
F. 10

Competition, regulation and litigation

Chorus’ competitive and regulatory environment is set out below. 

On 29 June 2012, the Government entered into an additional  

This should be read in conjunction with the competitive and 

‘Phase 2’ RBI agreement with Chorus to extend the deployment of 

Telecommunications Services Obligations (TSO)  
and Telecommunications Development Levy (TDL)

The TSO is the regulatory mechanism by which universal service 

obligations for residential, local access and calling services are 

imposed and administered. On demerger, the TSO obligations were 

retained but were split as follows:

•	 Chorus	is	required	to	maintain	lines	and	coverage	obligations	 

and provide a voice input service to Telecom; and

•	 Telecom	is	required	to	provide	retail	services	at	the	capped	 

retail prices.

The Telecommunications Amendment Act 2011 also implemented a 

number of TSO policy changes first announced by the Government 

in 2009 and confirmed in March 2010, including amendments to the 

The Government is required, under the Telecommunications 

Amendment Act, to commence a comprehensive review of the TSO 

at the start of 2013. This review will take into account, among other 

things, changes to the telecommunications sector that have arisen 

from the rollout of new infrastructure and facilities and the impact 

of this on the TSO arrangement, the continued need and relevance 

of the arrangement, the practicality of adopting a universal service 

obligation (rather than a provider specific TSO arrangement), the 

impact of the TSO funding arrangement and related regulatory 

issues. The review is required to be complete by the end of 2013. 

There is no guarantee or certainty of the outcome with respect to 

any of the items covered within the TSO review.

The Telecommunications Amendment Act also introduces the TDL, 

which is an industry levy of $50 million per year between FY10 and 

FY16 and $10 million each year thereafter for any TSO changes,  

non-urban telecommunications infrastructure, upgrades to 

emergency calling and other wide purposes so long as a consultation 

process is followed. Following the demerger both Telecom and 

Chorus will be liable for annual TDL payments. The amount payable 

by each liable person will be determined by the Commission based 

on the proportion of revenue that each liable person receives from 

telecommunications services offered by means of a public telephone 

network. In August 2012 the Commission determined that Chorus 

will be liable this financial year but has not yet determined the 

amount of the liability for Chorus.

Chorus is bound by three open access deeds of undertaking (Deeds). 

methodology used to assess the net cost of complying with the TSO.

regulatory disclosures, as set out in the scheme booklet (available at  

ultra fast broadband to schools, hospitals, health centres and libraries 

www.chorus.co.nz/financial-reports) and current period financial 

in Zone 3 (non-rural towns outside the UFB coverage area), excluding 

statements (see pages F13-F30).

Nelson/Marlborough, which was awarded to another party.

Ultra Fast Broadband (UFB) Initiative

The UFB initiative has the objective of accelerating the rollout  

of UFB to 75% of the New Zealand population over ten years, 

concentrating in the first six years on priority users. Under the 

UFB initiative $1.35 billion would be financed by the Crown, via 

Crown Fibre Holdings Limited (CFH), the Crown owned investment 

entity managing the funding in selected participants covering 33 

national regions. In May 2011, Telecom’s bid to participate in the 

Government’s UFB initiative was accepted by CFH and Telecom  

was awarded 24 out of the 33 candidate areas.

Chorus’ role in the RBI is building and delivering the fibre based 

infrastructure and services, while Vodafone’s role is building the 

wireless towers. The new RBI fibre and fixed line broadband (DSL) 

network will involve adding approximately 3,350 kilometres of  

new fibre, providing ultra fast broadband to approximately 1,040 

schools and 50 hospitals and family health centres, and installing 

or upgrading approximately 1,000 cabinets.

Chorus Open Access Deeds of Undertaking

The Copper, Fibre and Rural Broadband Initiative undertakings 

In order to participate in the UFB initiative, subject to certain 

represent a series of legally binding obligations focused around the 

necessary approvals, Telecom had to demerge into two listed  

provision of services on a non-discriminatory or equivalent basis.

entities, being:

•  Chorus, which owns and operates New Zealand’s nationwide 

fixed line access network infrastructure, and comprises the 

Chorus business unit and certain parts of Telecom Wholesale; and

•  Telecom, a retail focused telecommunications business 

comprising fixed, mobile and ICT businesses.

This demerger was successfully executed on 30 November 2011.

More specifically, the Deeds require that Chorus:

•	 Supplies	most	services	that	it	offers	in	accordance	with	a	principle	

of non-discrimination;

•	 Builds,	supplies	and	consumes	a	small	number	of	layer	1	‘input	

services’ on an Equivalence of Inputs (EOI) basis;

•	 Protects	customer	commercial	information	and	 

commercial information;

Subsequent to demerger Chorus has taken responsibility for the  

•	 Supplies	UBA	with	resold	voice	access	as	a	bundle;

UFB agreement with CFH.

Rural Broadband Initiative (RBI) 

On 20 April 2011 the Government announced that it had successfully 

concluded contract negotiations with Telecom and Vodafone for a 

combined $285 million fibre and wireless infrastructure rollout for 

•	 Publishes	standard	terms	contracts	in	respect	of	fibre	services;

•	 Develops	a	compliance	framework	including	provision	

of information to the Commission, self reporting and the 

development of key performance indicators to demonstrate that 

EOI and non-discrimination obligations are being met; and

rural areas over the next six years. The Government’s objectives for 

•	 Prepares	a	transition	plan	within	12	months	of	demerger	as	to	the	

the RBI are to have ultra fast broadband (100Mbps) to 93% of rural 

actions required to move to ending the sharing arrangements 

schools and fast broadband services (5Mbps or better) to at least  

between Telecom and Chorus without imposing significant and 

80% of rural households. A direct contribution by Government  

unreasonable costs on Chorus. 

($48 million) and a Telecommunications Development Levy (TDL) 

from the industry ($252 million over six years) will be used to fund 

the RBI. The RBI agreement between Telecom and the Crown was 

transferred to Chorus on demerger.

Chorus Management CommentaryOther regulatory matters

UCLL and SLU pricing

The terms, including price, for UCLL and SLU are currently regulated 

by the Commission. In November 2011, the Commission determined 

new geographically averaged prices for UCLL and SLU that will apply 

from 1 December 2014, as required by the Telecommunications 

Amendment Act. The Commission set prices of $24.46 and $14.77 

per month respectively by applying a simple average of existing 

de-averaged prices. The Commission then initiated a further 

benchmarking review of UCLL to consider whether the existing 

de-averaged prices and the averaged UCLL price should be updated. 

not underway for the determined UCLFS, the UCLL pricing review 

process has raised significant uncertainty around the level of pricing 

of these services and the copper pricing framework generally, given 

other services are linked to the UCLL price and the framework.

Line of business restrictions

There are three line of business restrictions that apply to Chorus. 

Chorus is prohibited from:

•	 Providing	services	to	end	users.	The	Commission	maintains	 
a published register of non-end users to which Chorus can  

In May 2012 the Commission issued a draft decision and issued a 

supply services;

further discussion document in August 2012, with a conference to 

be held in September 2012. The Commission expects to conclude 

the review in November 2012. While formal review processes are 

•	 Selling	services	that	link	two	or	more	end	users	sites;	and

•	 Providing	services	above	layer	2.

not underway for SLU and UCLFS, the UCLL pricing review process 

has raised significant uncertainty around the level of pricing of these 

Other legislation

Sub Loop Extension Services (SLES) and Sub Loop 
Unbundling (SLU)

Other litigation

Telecom was joined as one of numerous respondents in a claim 

In October 2010 the Commission announced the commencement 

lodged through the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services.  

of an investigation into Telecom’s alleged breach of the Operational 

The claim related to a property development site called ‘Ellerslie  

Separation Undertakings (the obligation not to discriminate) in 

Park’ where Telecom installed external telephone junction boxes.  

respect of Chorus’ provision of SLES and Telecom Wholesale’s failure 

This claim was settled at mediation in June 2012. The terms of  

to provide UBA with SLU and SLES. On 26 May 2011 the Commission 

the settlement are confidential to the parties. 

announced that it had decided to issue enforcement proceedings 

alleging that Telecom is likely to have discriminated in breach of 

the Operational Separation Undertakings by failing to provide other 

telecommunications retail service providers with UBA in conjunction 

with SLES, when it provided an equivalent service to its own retail 

business. A settlement of this matter was entered into in October 

2011 between Telecom, the Commission, Vodafone, Kordia, Orcon, 

CallPlus, Airnet and Compass, pursuant to which the total sum of 

$31.6 million was paid by Telecom to compensate the various retail 

Chorus has other ongoing claims, investigations and inquiries,  

none of which it currently believes are expected to have significant 

effect on the financial position or profitability of Chorus.

Chorus cannot reasonably estimate the adverse effect (if any)  

on Chorus if any of the foregoing outstanding claims or inquiries  

are ultimately resolved against Chorus’ interest. There can be  

no assurance that such cases will not have a significant effect  

on Chorus’ business, financial position and results of operations  

services and the copper pricing framework generally given that other 

Chorus continues to be subject to other legislative requirements 

service providers, in agreed amounts. Any residual issues arising  

or profitability.

services are linked to the UCLL price and the framework.

such as the requirements of the Commerce Act 1986, Fair Trading Act 

out of this matter were allocated to Chorus under the demerger.  

1986, as well as Telecommunications Carrier Forum codes. Chorus 

No residual issues have arisen. This matter is considered closed.

UBA pricing

The terms, including price, for UBA are currently regulated by  

the Commission. In November 2011, the Commission set an  

average price for uplift that applies when a retail service provider is 

taking UBA without analogue voice service (ie, either standalone or 

with a UCLFS or Baseband service). The pricing of the uplift reflects 

is also subject to the Telecommunications (Interception Capability) 

Act 2004 (the Act) which requires network operators to ensure that 

every public telecommunications network that they own, control or 

operate, and every telecommunications service that they provide in 

New Zealand, has interception capability meeting the specifications 

set out in the Act. The requirements under the Act have the potential 

the de-averaged UCLL pricing described above. The averaged pricing 

to drive significant compliance costs.

applies to UBA services purchased since 1 December 2011.

For three years from demerger date (until 1 December 2014) the 

price for UBA services will be ‘frozen’ for existing instances of UBA at 

the lower of the price on demerger and the price that applies under 

the UBA Standard Terms Determination at 30 June 2011 (which is 

based on the previous retail minus methodology). However, for 

new instances of the UBA service, the price will be geographically 

averaged. From three years after demerger date (1 December 2014) 

the UBA price will transition to a cost based pricing methodology. 

The Commission issued a draft discussion document in August 2012 

for consultation. The Commission proposes to determine the new 

cost based price for UBA by April 2013.

Unbundled Copper Low Frequency Service (UCLFS)

In order to meet its TSO requirements, Chorus has made available 

a technology neutral voice input service on a commercial basis. 

This service is known as Baseband. The pricing of a subset of the 

Baseband service, UCLFS (a voice input service offered over the 

copper access network), was determined by the Commission in 

November 2011 (at the same time as averaged prices for UCLL and 

SLU were determined). The price for UCLFS was set at the averaged 

UCLL price ($24.46 per month). While formal review processes are 

Telecommunications Act litigation

The following matters of existing litigation were allocated to Chorus 

on demerger.

Telecommunications Service Obligation

In November 2011 Vodafone New Zealand Limited v Telecom 

New Zealand Limited the Supreme Court dismissed appeals from 

a decision of the High Court (Vodafone New Zealand Limited v 

Telecom New Zealand Limited, HC Wellington, Winklemann J)  

setting aside the 2004/05 and 2005/06 TSO determinations.  

As a result of the Supreme Court judgement, TelstraClear and some 

other liable persons made a claim against Chorus for repayment  

of part of the sums paid to Telecom as a result of the Commission’s  

TSO cost calculations for the periods 2003/04 to 2007/08.  

As these claims were not covered by Telecom’s settlement with 

Vodafone in 2011, Chorus assumed responsibility for dealing 

with them as a result of the demerger. In June 2012, Chorus and 

TelstraClear settled all TSO claims and disputes between them. 

The terms of settlement are confidential to the parties. Chorus is 

in discussions with other liable persons in respect of any potential 

claims they may have arising out of the Supreme Court judgement. 

F. 11

Chorus Management CommentaryF.12

Chorus Financial Statements

Financial  
Statements

For the seven months ended 30 June 2012

Craig Davison – Programme	manager	(rBI	Deployment)

Chorus Financial Statements

Income statement 

F O R  T H E   S E V E N   M O N T H S   E N D E D   3 0   J U N E   2 0 1 2

(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)

Operating revenue

Operating expenses

Earnings/(loss) before interest, income tax, depreciation and amortisation

Depreciation

Amortisation

Earnings/(loss) before interest and income tax

Interest expense

Interest income

Net earnings/(loss) before income tax

Income tax (expense)/benefit

Net earnings/(loss) for the period

NOTES

GROUP
2012
NZ$m

PARENT
2012
NZ$m

8

9

2

3

10

14

 613 

 (214)

 399

 (150)

 (39)

 210

 (72)

 4 

 142

 (40)

 102

 – 

 (1)

 (1)

 – 

 – 

 (1)

 (66)

 62

 (5)

 1 

 (4)

Earnings per share

Basic and diluted earnings per share (dollars)

19

 0.26

Statement of comprehensive income 

F O R   T H E   S E V E N   M O N T H S   E N D E D   3 0   J U N E   2 0 1 2

(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)

Net earnings/(loss) for the period

Other comprehensive income

Effective portion of changes in fair value of cash flow hedges (pre-tax)

Amounts reclassified from cash flow hedge reserve to income statement

Tax benefit on cash flow hedge

Other comprehensive income/(loss) net of tax

Total comprehensive income/(loss) for the period net of tax

The notes on pages F16 to F30 are an integral part of these financial statements

NOTE

14

GROUP
2012
NZ$m

 102 

 (14)

 – 

 4 

 (10)

 92 

PARENT
2012
NZ$m

 (4)

 (14)

 – 

 4 

 (10)

 (14)

Independent auditor’s report

To the shareholders of Chorus Limited

Report on the company and group financial statements

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Chorus 

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient  

Limited (‘’the company’’) and the group, comprising the company 

and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

and its subsidiary, on pages F13 to F30. The financial statements 

comprise the statements of financial position as at 30 June 2012, 

the income statements and statements of comprehensive income, 

changes in equity and cash flows for the 7 month period then 

ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other 

explanatory information, for both the company and the group.

Directors’ responsibility for the company and group  

financial statements

Our firm has also provided other assurance services to the company 

and group. These matters have not impaired our independence 

as auditors of the company and group. The firm has no other 

relationship with, or interest in, the company and group.

Opinion

In our opinion the financial statements on pages F13 to F30:

•	 comply	with	generally	accepted	accounting	practice	in	 

The directors are responsible for the preparation of company and 

New Zealand;

group financial statements in accordance with generally accepted 

accounting practice in New Zealand and International Financial 

Reporting Standards that give a true and fair view of the matters 

to which they relate, and for such internal control as the directors 

determine is necessary to enable the preparation of company and 

group financial statements that are free from material misstatement 

•	 comply	with	International	Financial	Reporting	Standards;	

•	 give	a	true	and	fair	view	of	the	financial	position	of	the	

company and the group as at 30 June 2012 and of the financial 
performance and cash flows of the company and the group for 

the 7 month period then ended.

whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor’s responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these company  

Report on other legal and regulatory requirements

In accordance with the requirements of sections 16(1)(d) and 16(1)(e) 

of the Financial Reporting Act 1993, we report that:

and group financial statements based on our audit. We conducted 

•	 we	have	obtained	all	the	information	and	explanations	that	we	

our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing 

have required; and

(New Zealand) and International Standards on Auditing.  

Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements 

and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance  

about whether the company and group financial statements are  

free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence 

about the amounts and disclosures in the company and group 

financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the 

auditor’s judgement, including the assessment of the risks of  

material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due 

to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor 

considers internal control relevant to the company and group’s 

preparation of the financial statements that give a true and fair 

view of the matters to which they relate in order to design audit 

procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not 

for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of 

the company and group’s internal control. An audit also includes 

evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and  

the reasonableness of accounting estimates, as well as evaluating  

the presentation of the financial statements.

•	

in	our	opinion,	proper	accounting	records	have	been	kept	 

by Chorus Limited as far as appears from our examination  

of those records.

27 August 2012

Wellington

F. 13

 
 
 
 
 
F. 14

Statement of financial position

A S   AT   3 0   J U N E   2 0 1 2

(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)

Current assets

Cash and call deposits

Income tax receivable

Trade and other receivables

Finance lease receivable

Total current assets

Non-current assets

Derivative financial instruments

Investment and advances

Software and other intangibles

Network assets

Total non-current assets

Total assets

Current liabilities

Trade and other payables

Income tax payable

Total current liabilities excluding Crown funding

Current portion of Crown funding

Total current liabilities

Non-current liabilities

Trade and other payables

Derivative financial instruments

Finance lease payable

Debt

Deferred tax payable

Total non-current liabilities excluding CFH securities and Crown funding

CFH securities

Crown funding

Total non-current liabilities

Total liabilities

Equity

Share capital

Reserves

Retained earnings

Total equity 

NOTES

GROUP
2012
NZ$m

PARENT
2012
NZ$m

15

11

16

21

17

3

2

12

6

12

21

16

4

14

5

6

18

18

 140 

 – 

 198 

 3 

 341 

 2 

 – 

 180 

 2,411 

 2,593 

 2,934 

 328 

 14 

 342 

 2 

 344 

 9 

 110 

 121 

 1,609 

 177 

 2,026 

 3 

 34 

 2,063 

 2,407 

 435 

(10)

 102 

 527 

 61 

 1 

 40 

 – 

 102 

 2 

 2,238 

 – 

 – 

 2,240 

 2,342 

 31 

 – 

 31 

 – 

 31 

 – 

 110 

 – 

 1,609 

 12 

 1,731 

 3 

 10 

 1,744 

 1,775 

 581 

(10)

(4)

 567 

Total liabilities and equity

 2,934 

 2,342 

The notes on pages F16 to F30 are an integral part of these financial statements

On behalf of the Board

Sue Sheldon, Chairman 

Authorised for issue on 27 August 2012

mArK	rATCLIFFE, Chief Executive Officer 

Statement of changes in equity

F O R  T H E   S E V E N   M O N T H S   E N D E D   3 0   J U N E   2 0 1 2

(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)

Balance at 1 December 2011

Comprehensive income

Net earnings/(loss) for the period

Other comprehensive income

Net effective portion of changes in fair value of cash flow hedges

Net amounts reclassified from cash flow hedge reserve to  
income statement

Total comprehensive income/(loss)

Balance at 30 june 2012

(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)

Balance at 1 December 2011

Comprehensive income

Net earnings/(loss) for the period

Other comprehensive income

Net effective portion of changes in fair value of cash flow hedges

Net amounts reclassified from cash flow hedge reserve to  
income statement

Total comprehensive income/(loss)

Balance at 30 june 2012

The notes on pages F16 to F30 are an integral part of these financial statements

NOTE

18

18

NOTE

18

18

GROUP

RETAINED 
EARNINGS
NZ$m

CASH FLOw 
HEDGE 
RESERVE
NZ$m

 – 

 102 

 – 

 – 

 102 

 102 

 – 

 – 

 (10)

 – 

 (10)

 (10)

PARENT

RETAINED 
EARNINGS
NZ$m

CASH FLOw 
HEDGE 
RESERVE
NZ$m

 – 

 (4)

 – 

 – 

 (4)

 (4)

 – 

 – 

 (10)

 – 

 (10)

 (10)

SHARE 
CAPITAL
NZ$m

 435 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 435 

SHARE 
CAPITAL
NZ$m

 581 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 581 

TOTAL
NZ$m

 435 

 102 

 (10)

 – 

 92 

 527 

TOTAL
NZ$m

 581 

 (4)

 (10)

 – 

 (14)

 567 

Chorus Financial Statements 
 
 
 
Statement of cash flows

F O R  T H E   S E V E N   M O N T H S   E N D E D   3 0   J U N E   2 0 1 2

(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)

Cash flows from operating activities

Cash was provided from/(applied to):

Cash received from customers

Interest income

Payment to suppliers and employees

Income tax paid

Interest paid on debt and derivatives

Net cash flows from operating activities

Cash flows applied to investing activities

Cash was provided from/(applied to):

Purchase of network assets

Capitalised interest paid

Net cash flows applied to investing activities

Cash flows from financing activities

Cash was provided from/(applied to):

Proceeds from finance lease receivable

Crown funding (including CFH securities)

Proceeds from debt

Repayment of debt

Net cash flows from financing activities

Net cash flow

Cash at the beginning of the period 

Cash at the end of the period

The notes on pages F16 to F30 are an integral part of these financial statements

NOTE

GROUP
2012
NZ$m

PARENT
2012
NZ$m

 530 

 4 

 (147)

 (20)

 (35)

 332 

 (256)

 (3)

 (259)

2

25

 51 

 (51)

 27 

 100 

 40 

 140 

 – 

 48 

 (1)

 – 

 (38)

 9 

–

 – 

 – 

–

12

 51 

 (51)

 12 

 21 

 40 

 61 

15

R E C O N C I L I AT I O N   O F   N E T   E A R N I N G S /( L O S S )   T O   N E T   C A S H   F L O W S   F R O M   O P E R AT I N G   A C T I V I T I E S

(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)

Net earnings/(loss) for the period

Adjustment for:

Depreciation charged on network assets

Amortisation of Crown funding

Amortisation of software and other intangible assets

Other

Change in current assets and liabilities:

Change in trade and other receivables

Change in trade and other payables

Change in income tax payable

Net cash flows from operating activities

The notes on pages F16 to F30 are an integral part of these financial statements

GROUP
2012
NZ$m

 102 

 151 

 (1)

 39 

 2 

 293 

 (101)

 126 

 14 

 39 

 332 

PARENT
2012
NZ$m

 (4)

 – 

 – 

 – 

 9 

 5 

 (23)

 27 

 – 

 4 

 9 

F. 15

Chorus Financial Statements 
  
 
 
F. 16

Notes to the financial statements

Reporting entity and statutory base

Measurement basis

Chorus Limited is registered in New Zealand under the Companies 

The measurement basis adopted in the preparation of these financial 

Act 1993 and is an issuer for the purposes of the Financial Reporting 

statements is historical cost, modified by the revaluation of financial 

Act 1993. Chorus Limited was established as a standalone, publicly 

instruments as identified in the specific accounting policies below 

Information about critical judgements in applying accounting 

policies that have the most significant effect on the amounts 

recognised in the financial statements is included in the  

listed entity on 1 December 2011, upon its demerger from Telecom 

and the accompanying notes. 

Corporation of New Zealand Limited (Telecom). The demerger was a 

condition of an agreement with Crown Fibre Holdings Limited (CFH) 

to enable Chorus Limited to be the Crown’s Ultra Fast Broadband 

(UFB) provider in 24 regions, representing approximately 70% of the 

UFB coverage area. Chorus Limited is listed and trades on the NZX 

Specific accounting policies

Chorus was established as a standalone publicly listed entity on  

1 December 2011. The accounting policies adopted have been 

applied consistently throughout the period presented in these 

main board equity security market (NZSX), on the Australian Stock 

financial statements. 

Exchange (ASX) and trades on the over the counter market in the 

United States.

Basis of consolidation

The financial statements presented are those of Chorus Limited  

(the Company, Parent or the Parent Company) together with its 

subsidiary (the Chorus Group, Group or Chorus). 

Nature of operations

Chorus is New Zealand’s largest telecommunications utility company. 

Chorus maintains and builds a network predominantly made up of 

local telephone exchanges, cabinets, copper and fibre cables. Chorus 

has approximately 1.8 million fixed line connections. There are many 

thousand kilometres of copper cable and about 29,000 kilometres 

of fibre cable connecting homes and businesses to local exchanges, 

and roadside cabinets throughout the country.

Basis of preparation

These financial statements have been prepared in accordance 

with generally accepted accounting practice in New Zealand and 

the Financial Reporting Act 1993. They comply with New Zealand 

equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards (NZ IFRS) 

as appropriate for profit-oriented entities. They also comply with 

International Financial Reporting Standards.

Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date of acquisition,  

being the date on which the Group obtains control, and continue  

to be consolidated until the date when such control ceases.  

The financial statements of the subsidiary are prepared for the  

same reporting period as the Parent Company, using consistent 

accounting policies. All intra-group balances, transactions,  

unrealised gains and losses resulting from intra-group transactions 

and dividends are eliminated in full. Subsidiaries are recorded  

at cost less any impairment losses in the Parent Company  

financial statements.

Critical accounting estimates and assumptions

In preparing the financial statements, management has made 

estimates and assumptions about the future that affect the 

reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial 

statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses 

during the period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. 

Estimates and assumptions are continually evaluated and are based 

on historical experience and other factors, including expectations 

of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the 

circumstances. The principal areas of judgement in preparing  

These financial statements are expressed in New Zealand dollars, 

these financial statements are set out below.

which is Chorus’ functional currency. References in these financial 

statements to ‘$’, ‘NZ$’ and ‘NZD’ are to New Zealand dollars, 

references to ‘USD’ are to US dollars, references to ‘AUD’ are to 

Australian dollars, references to ‘EUR’ are to Euros and references 

to ‘GBP’ are to pounds sterling. All financial information has been 

rounded to the nearest million, unless otherwise stated.

following notes: 

Crown funding (note 6)

Chorus must exercise judgement when recognising Crown 

funding to determine if conditions of the funding contract have 

been satisfied. This judgement will be based on the facts and 

circumstances that are evident for each contract at the time  

of preparing the financial statements.

Leases (note 16)

Determining whether a lease agreement is a finance lease or 

operating lease requires judgement as to whether the agreement 

transfers substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership  

to Chorus.

Information about assumptions and estimation uncertainties that 

have a significant risk of resulting in a material adjustment within  

the next financial year are included in the following notes: 

Network assets (note 2)

Assessing the appropriateness of useful life and residual value 

estimates of network assets requires a number of factors to be 

considered such as the physical condition of the asset, expected 

period of use of the asset by Chorus, technological advances, 
regulation and expected disposal proceeds from the future sale  

of the asset.

CFH securities (note 5)

Determining the fair value of the CFH securities requires assumptions 

on expected future cash flow and discount rate based on future long 

dated swap curves. 

Chorus Financial StatementsNote 1 – Transfer of assets and liabilities from Telecom

Note 1 – Transfer of assets and liabilities from Telecom (continued)

Chorus has an extensive network comprising of local telephone 

Wholesale (layer 2) business unit that were formed as part  

exchanges, cabinets, copper and fibre cables. The origins of this 

of Telecom’s operational separation (2008-2011).

Debt

Network assets

As part of the demerger, Telecom bondholders elected to exchange 

On demerger certain network infrastructure assets (copper and fibre 

network lie in the New Zealand Post and Telegraph Department, 

followed by the privatisation of the network and establishment 

of Telecom in 1987. Today Chorus is largely a combination of 

the Chorus (layer 1) business unit and a portion of the Telecom 

Statement of financial position 

A S   AT   1   D E C E M B E R   2 0 1 1

(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)

Current assets

Cash

Trade and other receivables

Finance lease receivable

Total current assets

Non-current assets

Derivative financial instruments

Software and other intangibles

Network assets

Total non-current assets

Total assets

Current liabilities

Trade and other payables

Debt

Total current liabilities

Non-current liabilities

Trade and other payables

Derivative financial instruments

Finance lease payable

Debt

Deferred tax payable

Total non-current liabilities excluding Crown funding

Crown funding

Total non-current liabilities

Total liabilities

Equity

Share capital

Total equity 

Total liabilities and equity

F. 17

Chorus was established as a standalone publicly listed entity  

GBP235 million (NZ$625 million at hedged rates) of Telecom GBP 

cables, telephone exchanges and roadside cabinets) connecting 

on 1 December 2011. The statement of financial position below 

Euro Medium Term Notes (EMTN) to Chorus GBP EMTN, issued 

premises to the global telecommunications fixed line network were 

represents the values of assets and liabilities transferred from 

by Chorus under the Chorus EMTN programme. The related cross 

transferred from Telecom to Chorus. 

Telecom and items recognised at demerger.

currency interest rate swaps were novated to Chorus along with  

the EMTN. 

Note 2 – Network assets

In the statement of financial position, network assets are stated at 

cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment 

losses. The cost of additions to network assets and capital work in 

progress constructed by Chorus includes the cost of all materials 

used in construction, direct labour costs specifically associated  

with construction, interest costs that are attributable to the asset, 

resource management consent costs and attributable overheads. 

Repairs and maintenance costs are recognised in the income 

statement as incurred. 

Estimating useful lives and residual values of network assets 

The determination of the appropriate useful life for a particular asset 

requires management to make judgements about, amongst other 

factors, the expected period of service potential of the asset, the 

likelihood of the asset becoming obsolete as a result of technological 

Copper cables

Fibre cables

Ducts and manholes

Cabinets

Property

Network electronics

Other

10-20 years

20 years

50 years

5-14 years

5-50 years

2-14 years

2-15 years

Other network assets include motor vehicles, network management 

and administration systems and radio infrastructure. 

Any future adverse impacts arising in assessing the carrying  

value or lives of Chorus’ network assets could lead to future 

impairment losses or increases in depreciation charges that  

could affect future earnings.

advances, the likelihood of Chorus ceasing to use the asset in its 

An item of network assets and any significant part is derecognised 

business operations and the effect of government regulation. 

Where an item of network assets comprises major components 

having different useful lives, the components are accounted for  

as separate items of network assets. 

Where the remaining useful lives or recoverable values have 

diminished due to technological, regulatory or market condition 

changes, depreciation is accelerated. The asset’s residual values, 

useful lives, and methods of depreciation are reviewed at each 

upon disposal or when no future economic benefits are expected 

from its use or disposal. Where network assets are disposed of,  

the profit or loss recognised in the income statement is calculated  

as the difference between the sale price and the carrying value  

of the asset.

Non-monetary items that are measured in terms of historical cost in 

a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rates as at the 

dates of the initial transactions.

reporting period date and adjusted prospectively, if appropriate.

Land and work in progress are not depreciated. 

Depreciation is charged on a straight-line basis to write down the 

cost of network assets to their estimated residual value over their 

estimated useful lives. Estimated useful lives are as follows:

GROUP
2011
NZ$m

 40 

 38 

 2 

 80 

 1 

 155 

 2,280 

 2,436 

 2,516

 68 

 1 

 69 

 17 

 77 

 119 

 1,617 

 175 

 2,005 

 7 

 2,012

 2,081 

 435 

 435 

 2,516 

Chorus Financial StatementsF. 18

Note 2 – Network assets (continued)

Note 2 – Network assets (continued)

Impairment

COPPER 
CABLES
NZ$m

FIBRE 
CABLES
NZ$m

DUCTS AND 
MANHOLES
NZ$m

CABINETS
NZ$m

PROPERTy
NZ$m

NETwORk 
ELECTRONICS
NZ$m

OTHER
NZ$m

wORk IN 
PROGRESS
NZ$m

TOTAL
NZ$m

GROUP

Cost

Balance as at 1 December 2011

 2,365 

 490 

 705 

 372 

 467 

 1,283 

 185 

 69 

 5,936 

Additions

Disposals

Transfers from work in progress

 – 

 – 

 25 

 – 

 – 

 75 

Balance as at 30 June 2012

 2,390 

 565 

Accumulated Depreciation

 – 

 – 

 86 

 791 

 – 

 (5)

 13 

 – 

 – 

 6 

 – 

 (1)

 24 

 – 

 – 

 3 

 282 

 282 

 – 

 (232)

 (6)

 – 

 380 

 473 

 1,306 

 188 

 119 

 6,212 

Balance as at 1 December 2011

 (1,690)

 (192)

 (317)

 (146)

 (190)

 (952)

 (169)

Depreciation

Disposals

 (41)

 – 

 (13)

 – 

Balance as at 30 June 2012

 (1,731)

 (205)

Net carrying amount

 659 

 360 

 (7)

 – 

 (324)

 467 

 (15)

 5 

 (156)

 224 

 (8)

 – 

 (198)

 275 

The Parent does not hold any network assets. There are no 

restrictions on Chorus network assets or any network assets 

pledged as securities for liabilities. At 30 June 2012 the contractual 

commitment for acquisition and construction of network assets  

was NZ$23 million.

Depreciation

Chorus receives funding from the Crown to finance the capital 

expenditure associated with the development of the ultra fast 

broadband network, rural broadband services and other services.  

At Group level this funding is offset against depreciation over the life 

of the assets the funding is used to construct.

The Crown funding released against depreciation for the current 

period is as follows:

Depreciation charged on network assets

Less:  Crown funding – ultra fast broadband

Crown funding – rural broadband initiative 

Crown funding – other 

Total depreciation 

Refer to note 6 for information on Crown funding. 

 (62)

 1 

 (5)

 – 

 (1,013)

 (174)

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 (3,656)

 (151)

 6 

 (3,801)

 293 

 14 

 119 

 2,411 

GROUP
2012
NZ$m

 151 

 – 

 – 

 (1)

 150 

Property exchanges

Chorus has leased property exchange space owned by Telecom 

subject to finance lease arrangements. These have been included  

in Chorus’ network assets under the property category. As at 30 

June 2012 the property exchange assets capitalised under a finance 

lease had a cost of NZ$157 million, together with accumulated 

depreciation of NZ$3 million. 

Network electronics

At each reporting date, Chorus reviews the carrying amounts of its 

network assets to determine whether there is any indication that 

those assets have suffered an impairment loss. If any indication exists, 

the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated to determine the 

extent, if any, of the impairment loss recognised in earnings. Should 

the conditions that gave rise to the impairment loss no longer exist, 

and the assets are no longer considered to be impaired, a reversal  

of an impairment loss would be recognised immediately in earnings.

No impairment loss on the network assets were identified in the 

Chorus has joint arrangements for use of certain network electronics 

assets with Telecom. The equipment used by Chorus is included in 

the network electronics category of network assets. As at 30 June 

current period. 

Capitalised interest

2012 the equipment capitalised had a cost of NZ$16 million, together 

Finance costs are capitalised on qualifying items of network assets at 

with accumulated depreciation of NZ$3 million. 

an annualised rate of 6%. Interest is capitalised for the period required 

to complete the network assets and prepare for its intended use.  

In the current period finance costs totalling NZ$3 million have been 

capitalised against network assets.

Note 3 – Software and other intangibles

Software and other intangible assets are initially measured at cost. 

Other intangibles mainly consist of land easements. 

The direct costs associated with the development of network and 

business software for internal use are capitalised where project 

success is probable and the capitalisation criteria is met. Following 

initial recognition, software and other intangible assets are stated at 

cost less accumulated amortisation and impairment losses. Software 

and other intangible assets with a finite life are amortised from 

the date the asset is ready for use on a straight-line basis over its 

estimated useful life, which is as follows:

Software

Other intangibles 

2-8 years

6-20 years

At each reporting date, Chorus reviews the carrying amounts of its 

software and other intangible assets to determine whether there 

is any indication that those assets have suffered an impairment 

loss. If any indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset 

is estimated to determine the extent, if any, of the impairment loss 

recognised in earnings. Should the conditions that gave rise to 

the impairment loss no longer exist, and the assets are no longer 

considered to be impaired, a reversal of an impairment loss would  

be recognised immediately in earnings.

Where estimated useful lives or recoverable values have diminished 

due to technological change or market conditions, amortisation  

is accelerated. 

Chorus Financial Statements 
 
Note 3 – Software and other intangibles (continued)

Note 4 – Debt (continued)

Syndicated bank facility

Cost

Balance as at 1 December 2011

Additions

Transfers from work in progress

Balance as at 30 June 2012

Accumulated amortisation

Balance as at 1 December 2011

Amortisation

Balance as at 30 June 2012

Net carrying amount

GROUP

SOFTwARE
NZ$m

OTHER 
INTANGIBLES
NZ$m

wORk IN 
PROGRESS
NZ$m

TOTAL
NZ$m

 338 

 – 

 29 

 367 

 (188)

 (39)

 (227)

 140 

 5 

 – 

 1 

 6 

 – 

 – 

 –

 6 

 – 

 64 

 (30)

 34 

 – 

 – 

– 

 34 

 343 

 64 

 – 

 407 

(188)

(39)

(227)

180

Chorus has in place a NZ$1,350 million syndicated bank facility,  

with tranches of three and five year maturity on market standard 

Chorus utilises hedging instruments to manage the interest rate risk 
associated with the syndicated bank facility. The Group manages 

terms and conditions. The amount of undrawn syndicated bank 

interest rate exposure within Board approved parameters set out  

facility that is available for future operating activities is NZ$245 

in the treasury policy. 

million. The syndicated bank facility is held with bank and institutional 

counterparties rated -A to AAA, based on rating agency Standard  

& Poor’s ratings. 

Euro	medium	Term	notes	(EmTn)

The carrying value of syndicated bank facility approximates its  

fair value. 

FACE VALUE

260 million GBP

INTEREST RATE

DUE DATE

6.75%

6 Apr 2020

GROUP
2012
NZ$m

 513 

PARENT
2012
NZ$m

 513 

The Parent does not hold any software and other intangible assets.

Shared systems

There are no restrictions on Chorus software and other intangible 

assets or any software and other intangible assets pledged 

as securities for liabilities. At 30 June 2012 the contractual 

commitment for acquisition of software and other intangible  

assets was NZ$2 million.

Chorus has in place trading arrangements with Telecom for the 

portion of shared systems utilised by Chorus. Chorus’ share of these 

assets have been included as part of software and other intangibles. 

Chorus has in place cross currency interest rate swaps to hedge 

the foreign currency exposure to the EMTN. The cross currency 

interest rate swaps entitle Chorus to receive GBP principal and GBP 

fixed coupon payments for NZD principal and NZD floating interest 

payments. The floating interest rate exposure on the NZD interest 

payments have been hedged using interest rate swaps. 

The following table reconciles EMTN at hedged rates to EMTN at 

spot rates as reported under IFRS.

Note 4 – Debt

Debt is included as non-current liabilities except for those with 

Debt is initially measured at fair value, less any transaction  

maturities less than 12 months from the reporting date, which are 

costs that are directly attributable to the issue of the instruments.  

classified as current liabilities. 

It is subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective  

EMTN

Impact of hedged rates used

EMTN at hedged rates

interest method. 

GROUP
2012
NZ$m

 513 

 164 

 677 

PARENT
2012
NZ$m

 513 

 164 

 677 

Syndicated bank facility – 3 year

Syndicated bank facility – 5 year

Euro medium term notes 

Less: syndicated loans facility fee

Current

Non-current

F. 19

The fair value of EMTN, calculated based on the present value of 

future principal and interest cash flows, discounted at market interest 

rates at balance date, was NZ$576 million compared to a carrying 

value of NZ$513 million. 

GROUP
2012
NZ$m

 675 

 430 

 513 

 (9)

 1,609 

 – 

 1,609 

PARENT
2012
NZ$m

 675 

 430 

 513 

 (9)

 1,609 

 – 

 1,609 

Chorus Financial Statements  
  
 
 
F. 20

Note 4 – Debt (continued)

Schedule of maturities

Current

Due 1 to 2 years

Due 2 to 3 years

Due 3 to 4 years

Due 4 to 5 years

Due over 5 years

Total due after one year

Less: syndicated loans facility fee

GROUP
2012
NZ$m

 – 

 – 

 675 

 – 

 430 

 513 

 1,618 

(9)

 1,609

PARENT
2012
NZ$m

 – 

 – 

 675 

 – 

 430 

 513 

 1,618 

(9)

 1,609

None of Chorus’ debt has been secured against assets. However, 

Chorus New Zealand Limited (subsidiary) has provided a guarantee to 

there are financial covenants and event of default triggers, as defined 

the lenders in respect of the Chorus Limited syndicated bank facility 

in the various debt agreements. There has not been any trigger event 

and EMTN. 

or breach in covenants in the current period.

Refer to note 22 for information on financial risk management.

Note 5 – CFH securities

Chorus receives funding from the Crown to finance construction 
costs associated with the development of the UFB network.  
Chorus receives funding at a rate of NZ$1,118 for every premises 
passed (as certified by CFH) in return Chorus issues CFH equity 
securities, CFH debt securities and CFH warrants. The equity and 
debt securities issued by Chorus have an issue price of NZ$1 and 
are issued on a 50:50 basis.  For each premises passed, NZ$559 of 
equity securities and NZ$559 of debt securities are issued by Chorus 
for which Chorus receives NZ$1,118 funding in return. CFH warrants 
are issued for NZ$nil value. The total committed funding available for 
Chorus over the period of UFB network construction is expected  
to be around NZ$929 million. 

The CFH equity and debt securities are recognised initially at fair  
value plus any directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequently, 
they are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest 
method. The fair value is derived by discounting the NZ$559 of equity 
securities and NZ$559 of debt securities per premises passed by the 
effective interest rate based on market rates. The difference between 
funding received (NZ$1,118 per premises passed) and the fair value 
of the securities is recognised as Crown funding. Over time, the CFH 
debt and equity securities increase to face value and the Crown 
funding is released against depreciation and reduces to nil.

CFH equity securities 

CFH equity securities are a class of non-interest bearing security 
that carry no right to vote at meetings of holders of Chorus ordinary 

shares, but entitles the holder to a preferential right to repayment on 
liquidation and additional rights that relate to Chorus’ performance 
under its construction contract with CFH. 

Dividends will become payable on a portion of the CFH equity 
securities from 2025 onwards, with the portion of CFH equity 
securities that attract dividends increasing over time. A greater  
portion of CFH equity securities attract dividends if the proportion  
of premises with a fibre connection within Chorus’ coverage area  
at 30 June 2020 does not exceed 20%. The dividend rate will be  
equal to the New Zealand 180-day bank bill rate plus a margin of 6%.

The CFH equity securities are treated as a compound financial 
instrument with a Crown funding component due to the instrument, 
including an interest free loan from a government entity. On 
initial recognition, the fair value of the liability component of the 
compound instrument is calculated using market inputs with no 
residual amounts allocated to equity. Until the liability component 
of the compound instrument expires the CFH equity securities are 
required to be disclosed as a liability. The difference between the  
face value of the CFH equity securities and the fair value of the 
liability component is then recorded as Crown funding.

After this, the liability component is measured at amortised cost  
using the effective interest method and the Crown funding is 
amortised to depreciation on a systematic basis over the useful  
lives of the relevant UFB assets.

Note 5 – CFH securities (continued)

CFH debt securities

CFH warrants

CFH debt securities are unsecured, non-interest bearing and will  

Chorus issues CFH warrants to CFH for NZ$nil consideration, along 

carry no voting rights at meetings of holders of Chorus ordinary 

with each tranche of CFH equity securities. Each CFH warrant gives 

shares. Chorus will be required to redeem the CFH debt securities  

CFH the right, on a specified exercise date, to purchase at a set strike 

in tranches from 2025 to 2036 (at the latest) by repaying the face 

price a Chorus share to be issued by Chorus. A CFH warrant will 

value to CFH. An accelerated repayment schedule applies if the 

therefore be ‘in the money’ to the extent that the price that CFH can 

proportion of premises with a fibre connection within Chorus’ 

realise for the Chorus share exceeds the price paid to exercise the 

coverage area at 30 June 2020 does not exceed 20%.

CFH warrant. The strike price for a CFH warrant is based on a total 

The CFH debt securities are treated as a financial liability with a 

Crown funding component due to the instrument, including an 

interest free loan from a government entity. On initial recognition 

the difference between the face value of the CFH debt securities and 

their fair value (calculated using market inputs) is recorded as Crown 

shareholder return of 16% per annum on Chorus shares over the 

period December 2011 to June 2036. Therefore, a holder of a CFH 

warrant is only likely to exercise the CFH warrant if total shareholder 

return on Chorus shares has exceeded 16% per annum over the 

period June 2025 to June 2036.

funding. After this the liability component is measured at amortised 

At balance date Chorus had issued 272,207 warrants that had  

cost using the effective interest method and the Crown funding is 

a fair value and carrying value that approximated zero.

amortised to depreciation on a systematic basis over the useful lives 

of the relevant UFB assets.

At balance date the component parts of debt and equity  

instruments were:

CFH debt securities 

CFH equity securities

Total CFH securities

GROUP
2012
NZ$m

PARENT
2012
NZ$m

 2 

 1 

 3 

 2 

 1 

 3 

The carrying value of CFH debt and equity securities approximates  

Expected cash flows

its fair value.

Key assumptions

Although Chorus believes that the estimate of the liability 

components of the CFH securities on initial recognition are 

appropriate, the use of different methodologies or assumptions 

could lead to different measurements of these component parts.  

The liability components of the CFH securities have been calculated 

using expected cash flows discounted at risk-adjusted discount rates. 

Key inputs and assumptions used in these calculations on  

initial recognition include:

Discount rate

On initial recognition, the discount rate between 10.77% to 10.87% 

for the CFH equity securities and 6.65% to 6.90% for the CFH debt 

securities applied to the expected cash flows is based on long dated 

NZ swap curves. The swap rates were adjusted for Chorus-specific 

credit spreads (based on market observed credit spreads for debt 

issued with similar credit ratings and tenure). The discount rate on 

the CFH equity securities is capped at Chorus’ estimated cost of 

(ordinary) equity.

Timing of principal repayments and dividend cash flows have been 

based on forecasts that reflect economically rational outcomes given 

the terms of the CFH debt and equity securities.

Repayment dates have been based on an estimate that the 

proportion of premises with a fibre connection within Chorus’ 

coverage area will exceed 20% at 30 June 2020.

Sensitivity analysis

Chorus considers that it is reasonably possible that future outcomes 

may be different from the assumptions applied and could require  

a material adjustment to the carrying amount of the component 

parts of the CFH securities. The number of fibre connections 

assumed to have been made by 30 June 2020 is one of the key 

sensitivities implicit in the measurement of the CFH securities.  

A change in this proportion would result in the following impact  

on the financial statements:

Chorus Financial Statements 
Note 5 – CFH securities (continued)

Note 6 – Crown funding (continued)

CFH debt securities

ACTUAL

ALTERNATIVE 
OUTCOME 

IMPACT ON FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Continued recognition of the full amount of the Crown funding is 

Chorus is entitled to claim payment for the grantable costs 

contingent on certain material performance targets being met by 

attributable to the relevant milestones for deploying the rural link 

Chorus. The most significant of these material performance targets 

or rural cabinets. MED will pay Chorus one dollar of funding for 

relate to the number of premises passed by fibre optic cables by 

each dollar of grantable costs incurred by Chorus up to a maximum 

Fibre connection proportion

≥ 20%

< 20%

Increase CFH debt securities liability by NZ$263,000

key dates and compliance with certain specifications under User 

funding limit of about NZ$236 million. In addition MED reimburse 

Decrease Crown funding by NZ$263,000

Acceptance Testing (UAT) by CFH. 

Chorus for all capital expenditure attributable to school lead-ins.

CFH equity securities

Fibre connection proportion

≥ 20%

< 20%

Increase CFH equity securities liability by NZ$221,000

Decrease Crown funding by NZ$221,000

Rural Broadband Initiative

Chorus receives Crown funding from the Ministry of Economic 

Development (MED) for capital expenditure incurred under the  

Rural Broadband Initiative. 

During the period Chorus recognised NZ$18 million in funding from 

MED. The component parts of this funding can be summarised  

as follows:

Note 6 – Crown funding 

Funding from the Crown is recognised at fair value where there is 

reasonable assurance that the funding will be received and Chorus 

will comply with all attached conditions. Crown funding is then 

recognised in earnings as a reduction to depreciation expense on  

a systematic basis over the useful life of the asset the funding was 

used to construct.

Ultra fast broadband

Rural broadband initiative

Other

Current

Non-current

Ultra fast broadband

During the period the Group received NZ$13 million in funding from 

CFH, which equated to 11,388 premises passed. The component 

parts of this funding can be summarised as follows:

Funding received

Less:  CFH securities (see note 5)

Amortisation of contribution

Ultra fast broadband

F. 21

Funding recognised

Less:  Amortisation of contribution

Rural Broadband Initiative

Other

Chorus receives funding towards the cost of relocation of 

telecommunications equipment and extending the network  

coverage to rural areas. The component parts of this funding  

can be summarised as follows:

Funding recognised

Less:  Amortisation of contribution

Other

Note 7 – Segmental reporting

GROUP
2012
NZ$m

PARENT
2012
NZ$m

 18 

 – 

 18 

 – 

 – 

 – 

GROUP
2012
NZ$m

PARENT
2012
NZ$m

 9 

 (1)

 8 

 – 

 – 

 – 

An operating segment is a component of an entity that engages 

Chorus has determined that it operates in one segment 

in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur 

providing nationwide fixed line access network infrastructure. 

expenses whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the 

The determination is based on the reports reviewed by the Chief 

entity’s chief operating decision maker and for which discrete 

Executive Officer in assessing performance, allocating resources  

financial information is available.

and making strategic decisions. 

Chorus’ Chief Executive Officer has been identified as the chief 

All of Chorus’ operations are provided in New Zealand, therefore  

operating decision maker for the purpose of segmental reporting.

no geographic information is provided.

Revenue from Telecom exceeded 10 percent of Chorus’ operating 

revenue in the period to 30 June 2012. The total revenue from 

Telecom for the period ending 30 June 2012 was NZ$523 million.

GROUP
2012
NZ$m

PARENT
2012
NZ$m

 10 

 18 

 8 

 36 

 2 

 34 

 10 

 – 

 – 

 10 

 – 

 10 

GROUP
2012
NZ$m

PARENT
2012
NZ$m

 13 

 (3)

 – 

 10 

 13 

 (3)

 – 

 10 

Chorus Financial Statements 
 
F. 22

Note 8 – Operating revenue

Note 9 – Operating expenses (continued)

Revenue is recognised to the extent that it is probable that the 

Chorus recognises revenue as it provides services to customers. 

economic benefits will flow to Chorus and the revenue can be 

Billings are generally made on a monthly basis. Unbilled revenues 

reliably measured, regardless of when the payment is being made. 

from the billing cycle date to the end of each month are recognised 

Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received 

as revenue during the month the service is provided. Revenue is 

or receivable. 

deferred in respect of the portion of fixed monthly charges that have 

been billed in advance. Revenue from installations and connections 

are recognised upon completion of the installation or connection.

Operating leases

Auditor remuneration

Rent and rates costs include leasing and rental expenditure  

Included in other expenses are fees paid to auditors of NZ$550,000 

of NZ$3 million for property, network infrastructure and items  

for the audit of the statutory accounts and other fees of NZ$37,680 

of equipment. 

relating to the review of accounting treatment of CFH instruments 

and technical guidance on financial instrument accounting.

Basic copper

Enhanced copper

Fibre

Value added network services

Infrastructure

Field services

Other

Total operating revenue

Note 9 – Operating expenses

Labour costs

Provisioning

Network maintenance

Other network costs

Information technology costs

Rent and rates

Property maintenance

Electricity

Insurance

Consultants

Other

Total operating expenses

GROUP
2012
NZ$m

 399 

 89 

 28 

 18 

 14 

 47 

 18 

 613

PARENT
2012
NZ$m

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

Note 10 – Interest expense

Interest on syndicated bank facility

Interest on EMTN

Other interest expense

Capitalised interest

Total interest expense excluding CFH securities

CFH securities (notional interest)

Total interest expense

GROUP
2012
NZ$m

PARENT
2012
NZ$m

Interest expense on financial liabilities measured at amortised cost 

for the current period was NZ$59 million. Other interest expense 

includes a non-cash charge of NZ$7 million from mark to market  

of derivatives and NZ$9 million finance lease interest expenses.

 (31)

 (23)

 (52)

 (22)

 (30)

 (6)

 (8)

 (11)

 (3)

 (5)

 (23)

 (214)

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 (1)

 – 

 (1)

Note 11 – Trade and other receivables

Trade and other receivables are initially recognised at the fair value of 

the amounts to be received, plus transaction costs (if any). They are 

subsequently measured at amortised cost (using the effective interest 

method) less impairment losses.

Trade receivables

Other receivables

Intercompany receivables

Prepayments

Trade and other receivables

GROUP
2012
NZ$m

PARENT
2012
NZ$m

 (32)

 (27)

 (16)

 3 

 (72)

 – 

 (72)

 (32)

 (27)

 (7)

 – 

 (66)

 – 

 (66)

GROUP
2012
NZ$m

PARENT
2012
NZ$m

 135 

 62 

 – 

 197 

 1 

 198 

 – 

 18 

 22 

 40 

 – 

 40 

Labour costs

Pension contributions

Labour costs of NZ$31 million represents staff costs related to  

Included in labour costs are defined benefit payments to the  

non-capital expenditure.

New Zealand Government Superannuation Fund of NZ$149,000 

and contributions to Kiwisaver of NZ$346,000.  Chorus has no other 

obligations to provide pension benefits in respect of employees.

Chorus Financial StatementsNote 11 – Trade and other receivables (continued)

Note 13 – Commitments  

Trade receivables are non-interest bearing and are generally  

the current period and there have been no significant individual 

Network infrastructure project agreement

Capital expenditure

on terms 20 working days or less. 

Chorus maintains a provision for impairment losses when there  

impairment amounts recognised as an expense. Trade receivables  

are net of allowances for disputed balances with customers. 

Chorus is committed to deploying infrastructure for premises in 

At 30 June 2012 Chorus had NZ$25 million committed under 

the UFB candidate areas awarded to Chorus, to be built according 

contractual arrangements, with substantially all payments due  

is objective evidence of customers being unable to make required 

The ageing profile of trade receivables as at 30 June 2012 is as follows:

to annual build milestones and to be completed by no later than 

within one year. The capital expenditure commitments principally 

payments. Chorus has minimal provision for doubtful debt in 

31 December 2019. In total it is estimated that the communal 

relate to network assets.

Not past due

Past due 1-30 days

Past due 31-60 days

Past due 61-90 days

Past due over 90 days

GROUP
2012
NZ$m

PARENT
2012
NZ$m

 124 

 10 

 1 

 – 

 – 

 135 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

Chorus has a concentrated customer base consisting predominantly 

Any disputes arising that may affect the relationship between the 

of a small number of retail service providers. The concentration 

parties will be raised by relationship managers and follow the  

of Chorus’ customer base heightens the risk that a dispute with 

Chorus dispute resolution process. Chorus has NZ$11 million of 

a customer, or customer’s failure to pay for services, will have a 

accounts receivable that are past due but not impaired. The carrying 

material adverse effect on Chorus’ collectability of receivables. 

value of trade and other receivables approximate the fair value.  

The maximum credit exposure is limited to the carrying value of  

trade and other receivables.

infrastructure will pass an estimated 830,900 premises. Chorus  

has estimated that it will cost NZ$1.4-NZ$1.6 billion to build the 

communal UFB network by the end of 2019. 

Lease commitments 

Chorus has entered into finance leasing arrangements both as 

lessee and lessor for property exchanges. The future non cancellable 
minimum finance lease commitments for the period ending 30 June 

2012 for the Group was NZ$118 million. The net operating expense 

commitments relating to property finance lease arrangements was 

NZ$60 million.

Chorus has buildings, carparks, sites and other items of equipment 

under operating lease arrangements. The future non cancellable 

minimum operating lease commitments for the period ending  

30 June 2012 for the Group was NZ$19 million.

Joint arrangements

Chorus has a contractual commitment at 30 June 2012  

of NZ$21 million for payment for use of assets under joint 

arrangements with Telecom. 

Rural Broadband Initiative

As part of the Rural Broadband Initiative Phase 1, Chorus is 

committed to deploying approximately 3,100 kilometres of fibre  

to connect approximately 850 schools and enable approximately  

57% of rural users to access broadband speeds of at least 5Mbps.  

In addition, under Phase 2 of the Rural Broadband Initiative,  

Chorus will be deploying a further 250 kilometres of fibre to  

connect 189 provincial schools, up to 181 rural public libraries  

and 45 rural hospitals and family health centres.

The estimated cost of the build is in the range  

of NZ$280-NZ$295 million.

Note 12 – Trade and other payables

Trade and other payables are initially recognised at fair value  

less transaction costs (if any). They are subsequently measured  

at amortised cost using the effective interest method.

Trade payables

Joint arrangements

Accruals

Personnel accrual

Revenue billed in advance

Trade and other payables

Current

Non-current

GROUP
2012
NZ$m

PARENT
2012
NZ$m

 147 

 21 

 125 

 14 

 30 

 337 

 328 

 9 

 – 

 – 

 31 

 – 

 – 

 31 

 31 

 – 

Trade and other payables are non-interest bearing and normally 

Joint arrangements

settled within 30 day terms. The carrying value of trade and other 

payables approximate their fair values.

Certain network electronic assets and shared systems owned by 

Telecom are required for continued use by Chorus post demerger. 

The right to use these assets have been granted by Telecom under  

joint arrangements over the life of the assets.

F. 23

Chorus Financial Statements 
 
F. 24

Note 14 – Taxation

Note 14 – Taxation (continued)

Current and deferred tax is calculated on the basis of the laws 

Current and deferred tax are recognised in the income statement, 

enacted or substantively enacted at balance date.

except when the tax relates to items charged or credited to other 

movement in deferred tax balance during the period

Deferred taxation is recognised in respect of temporary differences 

between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying 

amounts in the financial statements. Future tax benefits are 

recognised where realisation of the asset is probable. 

Income tax 

Income statement

Current income tax

Current period income tax (expense)/credit

Deferred income tax

Network assets, software and other intangibles

Employee entitlements

Other

Income tax (expense)/credit recognised in income statement

Other comprehensive income

Current income tax

Current period income tax expense

Deferred income tax

Effective portion of changes in fair value of cash flow hedges

Income tax credit recognised in other comprehensive income

The taxation expense charged to earnings includes both current  

and deferred tax and is calculated after allowing for adjustments. 

Reconciliation of effective tax rate

Net earnings/(loss) for the period

      Add: Income tax (expense)/credit

Net earnings/(loss) before income tax

      Income tax at 28%

For the seven months to 30 June 2012 the effective tax rate of 28% 

equates to the statutory rate of 28%.

comprehensive income, in which case the tax is also recognised in 

other comprehensive income.

ASSETS/(LIABILITIES)

Fair value portion of EMTN debt securities and CCIRS hedging derivatives

Network assets, software and other intangibles

Employee entitlements

Finance leases

Other

Effective portion of changes in fair value of cash flow hedges

Total

ASSETS/(LIABILITIES)

Fair value portion of EMTN debt securities and CCIRS hedging derivatives

Effective portion of changes in fair value of cash flow hedges

Total

Imputation credits

Imputation credits available for subsequent reporting periods

GROUP

BALANCE  
1 DECEMBER 
2011
NZ$m

RECOGNISED 
IN PROFIT  
AND LOSS
NZ$m

RECOGNISED 
IN OTHER 
COmpREHENSIVE 
INCOME
NZ$m

BALANCE  
30 jUNE 2012
NZ$m

 (16)

 (201)

 2 

 35 

 5 

 – 

 (175)

 – 

 (13)

 2 

 – 

 5 

 – 

 (6)

PARENT

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 4 

 4 

 (16)

 (214)

 4 

 35 

 10 

 4 

 (177)

BALANCE  
1 DECEMBER 
2011
NZ$m

RECOGNISED 
IN PROFIT  
AND LOSS
NZ$m

RECOGNISED 
IN OTHER 
COmpREHENSIVE 
INCOME
NZ$m

BALANCE  
30 jUNE 2012
NZ$m

 (16)

 – 

 (16)

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 4 

 4 

 (16)

 4 

 (12)

GROUP
2012
NZ$m

 33 

PARENT
2012
NZ$m

-

The imputation credit amount represents the balance of the 

For the purposes of the Income Tax Act 2007 Telecom demerger 

imputation credit account as at the end of the reporting period, 

transactions do not give rise to, and are ignored for the purposes  

adjusted for imputation credits that will arise from the payment  

of, calculating available subscribed capital of Chorus.

of the provision for income tax. Imputation credits are available  

for use subject to the requirements of the Income Tax Act 2007 

being satisfied.

GROUP
2012
NZ$m

PARENT
2012
NZ$m

 (34)

 (13)

 2 

 5 

 (40)

 – 

 4 

 4 

 1 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 1 

 – 

 4 

 4 

GROUP
2012
NZ$m

PARENT
2012
NZ$m

 102 

 (40)

 142 

 (40)

 (40)

 (4)

 1 

 (5)

 1 

 1 

Chorus Financial Statements  
Note 15 – Cash and call deposits

Note 16 – Leases 

Cash and call deposits

GROUP
2012
NZ$m

 140 

PARENT
2012
NZ$m

 61 

Cash and call deposits are held with banks and financial institutions 

Cash flow

counterparties rated at a minimum of A+, based on rating agency 

Cash flows from certain items are disclosed net due to the short 

Standard & Poor’s ratings. Interest earned on call deposits is based  

term, quick turnover and volume of transactions involved.

on the daily deposit rate.  

There are no cash or call deposit balances held by Chorus that are 
not available for use. 

Cash flows from derivatives in cash flow and fair value hedge 

relationships are recognised in the cash flow statement in the same 

category as the hedged item.

Chorus is a lessee of certain network assets under both operating 

transfers substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership to 

and finance lease arrangements. Lease costs relating to operating 

Chorus. Judgement is required on various aspects that include,  

leases are recognised on a straight-line basis over the life of the  

but are not limited to, the fair value of the leased asset, the economic 

lease. Finance leases, which effectively transfer to Chorus 

life of the leased asset, whether or not to include renewal options 

substantially all the risks and benefits of ownership of the leased 

in the lease term, and determining an appropriate discount rate to 

assets, are capitalised at the lower of the leased asset’s fair value  

calculate the present value of the minimum lease payments.

or the present value of the minimum lease payments at inception 

of the lease. The leased assets and corresponding liabilities are 

recognised, and the leased assets are depreciated over their 

estimated useful lives.

Determining whether a lease agreement is a finance lease or an 

operating lease requires judgement as to whether the agreement 

Classification as a finance lease means the asset is recognised  

in the statement of financial position as network assets whereas  

for an operating lease no such asset is recognised. 

Chorus has exercised its judgement on the appropriate classification 

of network asset leases, and has determined a number of lease 
arrangements are finance leases.

The carrying values of cash and call deposits approximate their fair 

For the purposes of the statement of cash flows, cash is considered 

values. The maximum credit exposure is limited to the carrying value 

to be cash on hand, in banks and cash equivalents, including bank 

Finance leases

of cash and call deposits. 

Cash denominated in foreign currencies is retranslated into  

New Zealand dollars at the spot rate of exchange at the reporting 

date. All differences arising on settlement or translation of monetary 

items are taken to the income statement. 

overdrafts and highly liquid investments that are readily convertible  

to known amounts of cash which are subject to an insignificant risk 

of changes in values.

ASSETS/(LIABILITIES)

Minimum lease payments payable:

Less than one year

Between one and five years

More than five years

Total minimum lease payments

Less: future finance charges

Present value of minimum lease payments

Present value of minimum lease payments payable:

Less than one year

Between one and five years

More than five years

Total present value of minimum lease payments

Classified as:

Current asset – finance lease receivable

Non-current liability – finance lease payable

Total

The carrying value of the finance leases approximates their fair value.

GROUP
2012
NZ$m

PARENT
2012
NZ$m

 (8)

 (31)

 (395)

 (434)

 316

 (118)

 3 

 13 

 (134)

 (118)

 3 

 (121)

 (118)

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

F. 25

Chorus Financial Statements 
 
 
 
F. 26

Note 16 – Leases (continued)

Property exchanges 

Note 18 – Equity

Share capital 

Reserves   

Chorus has rented exchange space and commercial co-location 
space owned by Telecom, which is subject to finance lease 

lease arrangement. The payable and receivable under these finance 

lease arrangements are net settled in cash. The finance lease 

arrangements. Chorus in turn rents exchange space and commercial 

arrangement above reflects the net finance lease receivable and 

co-location space owned by Chorus to Telecom under a finance 

payable position. 

Chorus has 385,082,123 fully paid issued ordinary shares. The issued 

Cash flow hedge reserve

ordinary shares have no par value. There has not been any change 

The cash flow hedge reserve comprises the effective portion of 

to the number of ordinary shares issued during the seven months 

the cumulative net change in the fair value of cash flow hedging 

ending 30 June 2012. 

instruments related to hedged transactions that have not yet  

Operating leases 

Non-cancellable operating lease rentals are payable as follows:

Less than one year

Between one and five years

More than five years

Total

GROUP
2012
NZ$m

PARENT
2012
NZ$m

 4 

 11 

 4 

 19 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

The holders of ordinary shares are entitled to receive dividends as 

affected earnings.

declared from time to time, and are entitled to one vote per share  

For cash flow hedges, the effective portion of gains or losses from 

at meetings of Chorus. Under Chorus’ constitution, Crown approval 

remeasuring the fair value of the hedging instrument is recognised 

is required if a shareholder wishes to have a holding of 10%  

in other comprehensive income and accumulated in the cash 

or more of Chorus ordinary shares, or if a shareholder who is not  

flow hedge reserve. Accumulated gains or losses are subsequently 

a New Zealand national wishes to have a holding of 49.9%  
or more of ordinary shares.

Chorus issues securities to CFH based on the number of premises 

passed. CFH securities are a class of security that carry no right to 

vote at meetings of holders of Chorus ordinary shares but carry 

preference on liquidation. Refer to note 5 for additional information 

on CFH securities.

Should Chorus return capital to shareholders it will be taxable  

transferred to the income statement when the hedged item affects 

the income statement, or when the hedged item is a forecast 

transaction that is no longer expected to occur. Alternatively, when 

the hedged item results in a non-financial asset or liability, the 

accumulated gains and losses are included in the initial measurement 

of the cost of the asset or liability. 

The remeasurement gain or loss on the ineffective portion of a cash 

flow hedge is recognised immediately in the income statement.

Chorus has entered into leasing arrangements for buildings, carparks, 

extend the lease period based on terms that would then be agreed 

as Chorus has zero available subscribed capital on demerger. 

A reconciliation of movements in the cash flow hedge reserve follows: 

sites and other items of equipment which are classified as operating 

with the lessor. There are no other significant lease terms that relate 

leases. Certain leases are subject to Chorus being able to renew or 

to contingent rents, purchase options or other restrictions on Chorus.

Note 17 – Investment and advances

Chorus New Zealand Limited incorporated in New Zealand  

is a wholly owned operating subsidiary of Chorus Limited.

The investment in the subsidiary is carried at cost less any  

impairment losses and comprises:

Shares at cost

Term advance

Total investment and advances

Balance at 1 December 2011

(Gain)/loss recognised in other comprehensive income

Net amounts reclassified from cash flow hedge reserve to income statement

Balance at 30 june 2012

The periods in which the cash flows associated with cash flow 

hedges are expected to impact earnings are as follows: 

GROUP
2012
NZ$m

PARENT
2012
NZ$m

 – 

 10 

 – 

 10 

 – 

 10 

 – 

 10 

GROUP
2012
NZ$m

 – 

 – 

 – 

PARENT
2012
NZ$m

 538 

 1,700 

 2,238 

Cross currency interest rate swaps

Interest rate swaps

GROUP AND PARENT

wITHIN
1 yEAR
NZ$m

 – 

 – 

 – 

1-2 
yEARS
NZ$m

 – 

 – 

 – 

2-3 
yEARS
NZ$m

 – 

 2 

 2 

3-4 
yEARS
NZ$m

 – 

 – 

 – 

4-5 
yEARS
NZ$m

GREATER THAN 
5 yEARS
NZ$m

 – 

 4 

 4 

 (16)

 20 

 4 

Fair value hedge reserve

For fair value hedges, gains or losses from remeasuring the fair value 

Chorus did not have any hedging arrangements designated as a fair 

of the hedging instrument are recognised in the income statement, 

value hedge in the current period. 

together with any changes in the fair value of the hedged asset  

or liability.

Chorus Financial Statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Note 19 – Earnings per share

Note 21 – Derivative financial instruments

Chorus’ diluted earnings per share is calculated on the same basis as 

The calculation of basic earnings per share at 30 June 2012 is  

Chorus uses derivative financial instruments to reduce its exposure 

prices for identical or similar instruments in inactive markets and 

basic earnings per share. All of Chorus’ net earnings are attributable 

based on the net earnings for the period of NZ$102 million, and  

to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. 

financial instruments valued using models where all significant  

to the ordinary shareholders. Chorus currently does not have any 

the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding  

The use of hedging instruments is governed by the treasury policy 

inputs are observable.

equity instruments that result in dilution of earnings per share. 

during the period of 385 million, calculated as follows:

approved by the Board of Directors. 

The method of recognising the resulting remeasurement gain 

Derivatives are initially recognised at fair value on the date a derivative 

or loss depends on whether the derivative is designated as 

contract is entered into and are subsequently remeasured to fair 

a hedging instrument. If the derivative is not designated as a 

value. The fair values are estimated on the basis of the quoted  

hedging instrument, the remeasurement gain or loss is recognised 

market prices for similar instruments in an active market or quoted 

immediately in the income statement.

Net earnings attributable to ordinary shareholders (NZ$ millions)

Weighted average number of ordinary shares (millions)

Basic and diluted earnings per share

Note 20 – Related party transactions

Transactions	with	related	parties

GROUP
2012

 102 

 385 

 0.26 

Certain Chorus directors have relevant interests in a number of 

these entities have been entered into independently on an arm’s 

companies with which Chorus has transactions in the normal course 

length commercial basis.

of business. A number of Chorus’ directors are also non-executive 

directors of other companies. Any transactions undertaken with 

Key management personnel compensation

The table below includes remuneration of NZ$467,000 paid to 

directors for the period. 

Short-term employee benefits

Post-employment benefits

Termination benefits

Other long-term benefits

Share-based payments

Parent/subsidiary relationship

GROUP
2012
NZ$000’s

 3,108 

 – 

 – 

 542 

 – 

 3,650

PARENT
2012
NZ$000’s

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

Non-current derivative assets

Interest rate swaps

Forward exchange rate contracts

Cross currency interest rate swaps

Currency options

Non-current derivative liabilities

Interest rate swaps

Forward exchange rate contracts

Cross currency interest rate swaps

Currency options

The fair value of the short term forward exchange contracts and 

options as at 30 June 2012 is not significant.

The notional values of contract amounts outstanding are as follows:

Chorus Limited is the listed holding company with the debt 

Chorus New Zealand Limited for the operation and construction  

Interest rate swap

obligation for the EMTN and syndicated bank facility and is the  

of the network. Chorus New Zealand Limited has provided a 

Forward exchange contract

issuer of the CFH securities. Chorus New Zealand Limited is an 

guarantee to the lenders in respect of the Chorus Limited  

operational subsidiary providing fixed access and aggregation 

syndicated bank facility and EMTN debt.

services in New Zealand. Chorus Limited provides funding to  

Cross currency interest rate swap

Currency options

Intercompany interest income

Intercompany short term receivable

Intercompany term advance

All outstanding balances with these related parties are priced on an 

arm’s length basis.

F. 27

PARENT
2012
NZ$m

 60 

 22 

 1,700 

GROUP
2012
NZ$m

PARENT
2012
NZ$m

 – 

 – 

 2 

 – 

 2 

 32 

 – 

 78 

 – 

 110 

GROUP
2012
NZ$m

 1,242 

 5 

 4 

 677 

 4 

 6 

 4 

 – 

 – 

 2 

 – 

 2 

 32 

 – 

 78 

 – 

 110 

PARENT
2012
NZ$m

 1,242 

 5 

 4 

 677 

 4 

 6 

 4 

 1,942 

 1,942 

CURRENCy

MATURITy

NZD

2014 – 2020

NZD:EUR

NZD:USD

NZD:GBP

NZD:AUD

NZD:EUR

NZD:USD

2012

2012

2020

2012

2012

2012

Credit risk associated with derivative financial instruments is managed 
by ensuring that transactions are executed with counterparties 
with high quality credit ratings, along with credit exposure limits for 

different credit classes. The counterparty credit risk is monitored and 
reviewed by the Board on a regular basis. 

Chorus Financial StatementsF. 28

Note 22 – Financial risk management

Financial risk management 

Chorus’ financial instruments consist of cash, short-term deposits, 
trade and other receivables (excluding prepayments), investments 
and advances, trade and other payables, syndicated bank facility, 
EMTN, derivative financial instruments and CFH securities. 

Financial risk management for currency fluctuations and interest  
rate risk is carried out by the treasury function under policies 
approved by the Board. Chorus’ risk management policy, approved 
by the Board, provides the basis for overall risk management.

Chorus does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for 
trading purposes. All contracts have been entered into with major 
creditworthy financial institutions. The risk associated with these 
transactions is the cost of replacing these agreements at the current 
market rates in the event of default by a counterparty.

Currency risk 

Chorus’ exposure to foreign currency fluctuations predominantly 
arise from the foreign currency debt and future commitment 
to purchase foreign currency denominated assets. The primary 
objective in managing foreign currency risk is to protect against  
the risk that Chorus assets, liabilities and financial performance  
will fluctuate due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. 
Chorus enters into foreign exchange contracts, foreign currency 
options and cross currency interest rate swaps to manage the  
foreign exchange exposure. 

Chorus holds GBP260 million foreign currency debt in the form of 
EMTN. Chorus has in place cross currency interest rate swaps with 
a right to receive GBP260 million principal and GBP fixed coupon 

payments for NZ$677 million principal and floating NZD interest 
payments. The exchange gain or loss resulting from the translation 
of EMTN denominated in foreign currency to New Zealand dollars is 
recognised in the income statement. The movement is offset by the 
translation of the principal value of the related cross currency interest 
rate swap. 

As at 30 June 2012, Chorus did not have any significant unhedged 
exposure to currency risk. A 10% increase or decrease in the exchange 
rate has minimal impact on profit and equity reserves of Chorus. 

Interest rate risk 

Chorus has interest rate risk arising from the cross currency interest 
rate swap converting the foreign debt into a floating rate New 
Zealand dollar obligation and the floating rate on the drawn down 
portion of the syndicated bank facility. Chorus aims to reduce the 
uncertainty of changes in interest rate by entering into interest rate 
swaps to fix the effective interest rate to minimise the cost of net 
debt and manage the impact of interest rate volatility on earnings. 
The interest risk on the cross currency interest rate swaps has been 
fully hedged using interest rate swaps. The interest rate exposure 
on the syndicated banking facility has been hedged up to NZ$565 
million with the remaining paying floating interest.

Interest rate repricing analysis
The following table indicates the earliest period in which recognised 
financial instruments reprice or mature. Fixed rate balances presented 
include the effect of derivative financial instruments, hedging both 
interest rates and foreign exchange.

Note 22 – Financial risk management (continued)

Floating rate

Cash and call deposits

Debt

Fixed rate

Debt (after hedging)

CFH securities

PARENT

wITHIN
1 yEAR
NZ$m

1-2 
yEARS
NZ$m

2-3 
yEARS
NZ$m

3-4 
yEARS
NZ$m

4-5 
yEARS
NZ$m

 61 

 540 

 – 

 – 

 601 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 350 

 – 

 350 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 215 

 – 

 215 

GREATER 
THAN 
5 yEARS
NZ$m

 – 

 – 

 677 

 3 

 680 

TOTAL 
NZ$m

 61 

 540 

 1,242 

 3 

 1,846 

As at 30 June 2012 a change of 100 basis points in interest rate 

would increase/(decrease) equity (after hedging) and earnings  

by the amounts shown below:

100 basis point increase 

100 basis point decrease 

The Group does not have any additional exposure to interest rate risk.

GROUP

PARENT

2012
NZ$m
ProFIT	or	
LOSS

 (5)

 5 

2012
NZ$m

EquITy

 21 

 (23)

2012
NZ$m
ProFIT	or	
LOSS

 (5)

 5 

2012
NZ$m

EquITy

 21 

 (23)

GROUP

Credit risk

Floating rate

Cash and call deposits

Debt

Fixed rate

Joint arrangements

Debt (after hedging)

CFH securities

Finance lease (net settled)

wITHIN
1 yEAR
NZ$m

1-2 
yEARS
NZ$m

2-3 
yEARS
NZ$m

3-4 
yEARS
NZ$m

4-5 
yEARS
NZ$m

 140 

 540 

 11 

 – 

 – 

 (3)

 688 

 – 

 – 

 7 

 – 

 – 

 (3)

 4 

 – 

 – 

 3 

 350 

 – 

 (3)

 350 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 (3)

 (3)

 – 

 – 

 – 

 215 

 – 

 (4)

 211 

GREATER 
THAN 
5 yEARS
NZ$m

 – 

 – 

 – 

 677 

 3 

 134 

 814 

TOTAL 
NZ$m

 140 

 540 

 21 

 1,242 

 3 

 118 

 2,064 

In the normal course of its business, Chorus incurs counterparty 

credit risk from financial instruments, including cash, call deposits, 

trade and other receivables, finance lease receivables and derivative 

financial instruments.

The maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date was  

as follows:

Cash and call deposits

Trade and other receivables

Derivative financial instruments

maximum exposure to credit risk

Refer to individual notes for additional information on credit risk.

NOTES

15

11

21

GROUP
2012
NZ$m

 140 

 197 

 2 

 339 

PARENT
2012
NZ$m

 61 

 40 

 2 

 103 

Chorus Financial Statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Note 22 – Financial risk management (continued)

Liquidity risk 

Liquidity risk is the risk that Chorus will encounter difficulty raising 

sufficient cash and the ability to meet its financial obligations.  

liquid funds to meet commitments as they fall due or foregoing 

Chorus’ exposure to liquidity risk based on contractual cash flows 

investment opportunities, resulting in defaults or excessive debt 

relating to financial liabilities is summarised below:

costs. Prudent liquidity risk management implies maintaining 

CARRyING 
AMOUNT
NZ$m

CONTRACTUAL 
CASH FLOw
NZ$m

LESS THAN 
1 yEAR
NZ$m

Non-derivative financial liabilities

Trade and other payables

Finance lease (net settled)

Debt

CFH securities

Derivative financial liabilities

Interest rate swaps

Cross currency interest rate swaps

Inflows

Outflows

Forward exchange rate contracts

Inflows

Outflows

 293 

 118 

 1,609 

 3 

 32 

 – 

 78 

 – 

 – 

 295 

 434 

 2,024 

 6 

 285 

 8 

 74 

 – 

 (279)

 304 

 (9)

 9 

 (35)

 38 

 (9)

 9 

CARRyING 
AMOUNT
NZ$m

CONTRACTUAL 
CASH FLOw
NZ$m

LESS THAN 
1 yEAR
NZ$m

GROUP

1 – 2
yEAR
NZ$m

 7 

 8 

 74 

 – 

2-3 
yEARS
NZ$m

3-4 
yEARS
NZ$m

4-5 
yEARS
NZ$m

5+ 
yEARS 
NZ$m

 3 

 8 

 737 

 – 

 – 

 8 

 50 

 – 

 – 

7

 472 

 – 

 – 

 395 

 617 

 6 

 (35)

 38 

 – 

 – 

PARENT

1 – 2
yEAR
NZ$m

 (35)

 38 

 – 

 – 

 (35)

 38 

 – 

 – 

 (35)

 38 

 – 

 – 

 (104)

 114 

 – 

 – 

2-3 
yEARS
NZ$m

3-4 
yEARS
NZ$m

4-5 
yEARS
NZ$m

5+ 
yEARS 
NZ$m

Note 22 – Financial risk management (continued)

The gross (inflows)/outflows of derivative financial liabilities disclosed 

to establish if they are effective in offsetting changes in fair values or 

in the previous table represent the contractual undiscounted cash 

cash flows of hedged items. Chorus discontinues hedge accounting 

flows relating to derivative financial liabilities held for risk management 

if (a) the hedging instrument expires or is sold, terminated, or 

purposes and which are usually not closed out prior to contractual 

exercised; (b) the hedge no longer meets the criteria for hedge 

maturity. The disclosure shows net cash flow amounts for derivatives 

accounting; or (c) the hedge designation is revoked. 

that are net cash settled and gross cash inflow and outflow amounts 

for derivatives that have simultaneous gross cash settlement (for 

example, forward exchange contracts).

Chorus manages the liquidity risk by ensuring sufficient access 

to committed facilities, continuous cash flow monitoring and 

maintaining prudent levels of short term debt maturities. At balance 

date, Chorus has available approximately NZ$245 million under the 

syndicated bank facility for its immediate use. 

Capital risk management 

Chorus manages its capital considering shareholders’ interests, the 
value of Chorus assets and Chorus’ credit ratings. The capital Chorus 

The Board is committed to maintaining a ‘BBB’ long term credit rating 

from Standard & Poor’s and a ‘Baa2’ long term credit rating from 

Hedges are classified into two primary types: 

•	 cash	flow	hedges;	and	

•	

fair	value	hedges.	

Refer to note 18 for additional information on cash flow and fair value 

hedge reserves.

Fair value  

Under NZ IFRS, financial instruments are either carried at amortised 
cost, less any provision for impairment losses, or fair value. The only 

significant variances between instruments held at amortised cost and 

their fair value relates to the EMTN. 

For those instruments, recognised at fair value in the statement of 

financial position, fair values are determined as follows:

Moody’s Investors Service. Chorus’ capital management policies are 

Level 1: Quoted market prices – financial instruments with quoted 

designed to ensure that this objective is met. It is Chorus’ intention 

prices for identical instruments in active markets.

that in normal circumstances the ratio of net debt to EBITDA will not 

materially exceed 3.5 times.

Hedge accounting

Chorus designates and documents the relationship between hedging 

instruments and hedged items, as well as the risk management 

objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. 

At hedge inception (and on an ongoing basis) hedges are assessed 

Level 2: Valuation techniques using observable inputs – financial 

instruments with quoted prices for similar instruments in active 

markets or quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in 

inactive markets and financial instruments valued using models 

where all significant inputs are observable.

Level 3: Valuation techniques with significant non-observable inputs 

– financial instruments valued using models where one or more 

significant inputs are not observable.

 82 

 12 

 12 

 12 

 11 

 10 

 25 

manages consists of cash and debt balances.

Non-derivative financial liabilities

Trade and other payables

Debt

CFH securities

Derivative financial liabilities

Interest rate swaps

Cross currency interest rate swaps

Inflows

Outflows

Forward exchange rate contracts

Inflows

Outflows

F. 29

 32 

 – 

 78 

 – 

 – 

 31 

 1,609 

 3 

 31 

 2,024 

 6 

 31 

 74 

 – 

 – 

 74 

 – 

 – 

 737 

 – 

 – 

 50 

 – 

 – 

 472 

 – 

–

 617 

 6 

 82 

 12 

 12 

 12 

 11 

 10 

 25 

Cross currency interest rate swaps

Financial assets

 (279)

 304 

 (9)

 9 

 (35)

 38 

 (9)

 9 

 (35)

 38 

 – 

 – 

 (35)

 38 

 – 

 – 

 (35)

 38 

 – 

 – 

 (35)

 38 

 – 

 – 

 (104)

 114 

 – 

 – 

Financial liabilities

Interest rate swaps

Cross currency interest rate swaps

GROUP AND PARENT

LEVEL 1
NZ$m

LEVEL 2
NZ$m

LEVEL 3
NZ$m

 – 

 – 

 – 

 2 

 32 

 78 

 – 

 – 

 – 

Cross currency interest rate swaps and interest rate swaps 

Fair values are estimated on the basis of the quoted market prices 

future cash flows of the derivative using the applicable forward 

of these instruments. If a listed market price is unavailable, then fair 

price curve (for the relevant interest rate, foreign exchange rate or 

value is estimated by using a valuation model involving discounted 

commodity price) and discount rate.

Chorus Financial Statements 
 
 
 
 
 
F. 30

Note 22 – Financial risk management (continued)

Note 23 – Contingencies

The carrying amounts of financial assets and liabilities in each of the NZ IAS 39 categories are as follows:

Assets

Cash and call deposits

Trade receivables

Other receivables

Derivative financial instruments

Liabilities

Trade accounts payable

Joint arrangements 

Accruals

Derivative financial instruments

Finance lease (net settled)

Debt

CFH securities

Assets

Cash and call deposits

Other receivables

Intercompany receivables

Investment and advances

Derivative financial instruments

Liabilities

Accruals

Joint arrangements 

Debt

CFH securities

GROUP

FAIR VALUE 
THROUGH 
PROFIT OR 
LOSS
NZ$m

HELD TO 
MATURITy
NZ$m

LOANS AND 
RECEIVABLES
NZ$m

AVAILABLE  
FOR SALE
NZ$m

DESIGNATED 
IN A HEDGING 
RELATIONSHIP
NZ$m

OTHER 
FINANCIAL 
LIABILITIES AT 
AMORTISED 
COST
NZ$m

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

–

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

–

 – 

 140 

 135 

 62 

 – 

 337 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

–

 – 

PARENT

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

–

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 2 

 2 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 110 

 – 

 – 

–

 110 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 147 

 21 

 125 

 – 

 118 

 1,609 

 3 

2,023

FAIR VALUE 
THROUGH 
PROFIT OR 
LOSS
NZ$m

HELD TO 
MATURITy
NZ$m

LOANS AND 
RECEIVABLES
NZ$m

AVAILABLE  
FOR SALE
NZ$m

DESIGNATED 
IN A HEDGING 
RELATIONSHIP
NZ$m

OTHER 
FINANCIAL 
LIABILITIES AT 
AMORTISED 
COST
NZ$m

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 61 

 18 

 22 

1,700

 – 

1,801

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 2 

 2 

 – 

 110 

 – 

 – 

 110 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 – 

 31 

 – 

 1,609 

 3 

 1,643 

Where Chorus concludes that its defence will more likely than not be 

the Crown under the Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975. Some of these 

successful, then such lawsuits or claims are considered a contingent 

claims may affect land transferred to Telecom by the Crown, some 

liability and no provision is recognised. When it is more likely than 

of which was transferred to Chorus on demerger. Any land resumed 

not that Chorus is liable and there will be an outflow of resources to 

by the Crown for treaty settlement purposes must be acquired under 

settle a lawsuit or claim, a provision is recognised, unless the amount 

the Public Works Act 1981 and Chorus would be compensated in 

cannot be measured reliably. There can be no assurance that such 

accordance with the provisions of that Act.

litigation will not have a material adverse effect on Chorus’ business, 

financial condition or results of operations.

Other litigation

Land claims

Telecom was joined as one of numerous respondents in a claim 

lodged through the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services. The 

Interests in land included in property, plant and equipment purchased 

claim related to a property development site called ‘Ellerslie Park’ 

from the Crown may be subject to claims to the Waitangi Tribunal 
or deemed to be wāhi tapu and, in either case, may be resumed by 

where Telecom installed external telephone junction boxes. This 
claim was settled at mediation in June 2012. The terms of the 

the Crown. Certain claims have been brought or are pending against 

settlement are confidential to the parties. 

Note 24 – Post balance date events

Dividends

CFH securities and Crown funding

On 27 August 2012 Chorus declared a prorated dividend in respect 

Chorus issued a call notice on 17 August 2012 to CFH with an 

of the seven month period ending 30 June 2012. The total amount 

aggregate issue price of NZ$13 million. The component of the cash 

of the dividend is NZ$56 million, which represents a fully imputed 

received will be allocated as follows: CFH debt securities NZ$2 million, 

dividend of 14.6 cents per share.

CFH equity securities NZ$1 million and Crown funding NZ$10 million.

Note 25 – New standards, amendments and 
interpretations to existing standards have been 
published but not yet adopted

Certain new standards, amendments and interpretations have been 

published that have not been early adopted, and which are relevant 

to Chorus are as follows: 

NZ IFRS 9 Financial instruments 

The standard outlines the accounting by entities that jointly control 

an arrangement. Joint control involves the contractual agreed 

sharing of control and arrangements subject to joint control are 

classified as either a joint venture (representing a share of net  

assets and equity accounted) or a joint operation (representing 

rights to assets and obligations for liabilities, accounted for under 

proportional consolidation).

Effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2015 

nZ	IFrs	12	Disclosure	of	interest	in	other	entities	

The standard adds the requirements related to the classification, 

Effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013 

measurement and derecognition of financial assets and liabilities.

NZ IFRS 10 Consolidated financial statements 

Effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013 

The standard applies to entities that have an interest in subsidiaries, 

joint arrangements, associates or unconsolidated structured entities. 

It establishes disclosure objectives and specifies minimum disclosures 

that an entity must provide to meet those objectives. 

The standard introduces new principles in identifying the concept 

of control as the determining factor in whether an entity should 

NZ IFRS 13 Fair value measurement 

be included within the consolidated financial statements of the 

Effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013 

parent company and provides additional guidance to assist in the 

determination of control where this is difficult to assess. 

NZ IFRS 11 Joint arrangements 

The standard establishes a single framework for measuring fair value 

where that is required by other standards and is applicable to both 

financial and non-financial items.

Effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013.

The standards are not expected to have a material impact on Chorus. 

Chorus Financial StatementsGlossary	of	terms	

ASX

Baseband

Australian Securities Exchange

A technology neutral voice input service that can be bundled with  

a broadband product or provided on a standalone basis

ISDN

MED

Integrated Services Digital Network

Ministry of Economic Development – since 1 July 2012,  

part of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment

Basic UBA

Basic Unbundled Bitstream Access, available with or without  

Naked UBA

Broadband only UBA connections, without analogue voice service

Board

Chorus

analogue voice service

The board of directors of Chorus Limited

Chorus Limited and, where the context requires, its subsidiary

Chorus Shares

Ordinary shares in Chorus

Commission

Commerce Commission

CFH 

Demerger

DSL 

Crown Fibre Holdings Limited

The demerger of Chorus by Telecom, as detailed in the scheme booklet

Digital Subscriber Line, a family of communications technologies allowing  

high-speed data over existing copper-based telephony plant in the local loop

EBITDA

Earnings before interest, income tax, depreciation and amortisation

Enhanced UBA

Enhanced Unbundled Bitstream Access, available with or without analogue voice service

EOI

FS

Fy

Equivalence of Inputs

Full speed

Financial period – twelve months ended 30 June, except for  

FY12 which is the seven months ended 30 June 2012

HSNS Lite (Fibre)

High Speed Network Service Lite over fibre

HSNS Lite (Copper)

High Speed Network Service Lite over copper

HSNS Premium

High Speed Network Service Premium (Bitstream 4)

IP

Internet Protocol

NGA

NZSX

PSTN

RBI

Next Generation Access

Main board equity securities market operated by the NZX

Public Switched Telephone Network, a nationwide dial-up telephone network

Rural Broadband Initiative

Scheme booklet

The Telecom demerger scheme booklet, published on 13 September 2011 available  

at www.chorus.co.nz/financial-reports

SLES

SLU

STD

TDL

Telecom

TSO

UBA

UCLFS

UCLL

UFB

VDSL2

Sub Loop Extension Service

Sub Loop Unbundling

Standard Terms Determination

Telecommunications Development Levy

Telecom Corporation of New Zealand Limited and, where the context requires, subsidiaries

Telecommunications Service Obligation recorded in the Telecommunications  

Service Obligation deed for local residential telephone service between  

the Crown and Telecom New Zealand Limited, dated December 2001

Unbundled Bitstream Access

Unbundled Copper Low Frequency Service

Unbundled Copper Local Loop

Ultra Fast Broadband

Very High Speed Digital Subscriber Line – a DSL technology

F. 31

Chorus Financial StatementsForward looking statements and disclaimer

This annual report may contain forward looking statements regarding future events and the future financial performance of Chorus, including 
forward looking statements regarding industry trends, strategies, capital expenditure, the construction of the UFB network, credit ratings and 
future financial and operational performance. These forward looking statements are not guarantees or predictions of future performance, and 
involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond Chorus’ control and which may cause actual 
results to differ materially from those expressed in the statements contained in this annual report. No representation, warranty or undertaking, 
express or implied, is made as to the fairness, accuracy or completeness of the information contained, referred to or reflected in this annual 
report or any information provided orally or in writing in connection with it. Please read this annual report in the wider context of material 
previously published by Chorus and released through the NZSX and ASX.

Governance & Disclosures

Contents

Governance at Chorus 
The Chorus Board 
Diversity at Chorus 

P.7
P.7
P.8

Remuneration at Chorus  
Disclosures 
Directory 

P.9
P.10
P.12

GOVERNANCE AT CHORUS

The Board and management are committed to ensuring that Chorus maintains international 

The Audit and Risk Management Committee (ARMC) is responsible for the risk management 

best practice governance structures and adheres to the highest ethical standards. The Board will 

framework and monitoring compliance with that framework. The ARMC and the Board regularly 

regularly review and assess Chorus’ governance structures and processes to ensure that they 

receive reports on risk management, which include reports on the effectiveness of Chorus’ 

are consistent with international best practice, both in form and substance.

management of its material business risks. 

Framework

Chorus has a dual listing of its shares on the NZSX and on the ASX and is required to comply 

with the listing rules of the NZSX and ASX.

Chorus is subject to governance requirements in both New Zealand and Australia.  

This includes the NZSX Listing Rules and Corporate Governance Best Practice Code;  

the New Zealand Securities Commission’s (now Financial Markets Authority (FMA)) report 

entitled ‘Corporate Governance in New Zealand Principles and Guidelines’; the ASX Listing 

Rules and the ASX Corporate Governance Council’s Principles and Recommendations.

As is appropriate for an NZSX and ASX dual listed company, Chorus has reviewed the 

Chorus requires its CEO and CFO to make an annual declaration in relation to Chorus’ financial 

statements relating to the matters set out in s295A of the Australian Corporations Act 2001.  

The CEO and CFO provided the Board with a declaration that in their opinion:

•	

•	

•	

the	financial	records	of	Chorus	have	been	properly	maintained;

the	financial	statements	of	Chorus	and	accompanying	notes	set	out	in	this	2012	annual	
report comply with generally accepted accounting practice in New Zealand and 
International Financial Reporting Standards; and

the	financial	statements	of	Chorus	and	accompanying	notes	set	out	in	this	2012	annual	
report give a true and fair view of the financial position and performance of Chorus.

requirements and adopted practices and policies during the financial period consistent with  

The above declaration was founded on a sound system of risk management and internal  

the requirements across both jurisdictions and the Chorus operations and culture. The Board 

control and that system is operating effectively in all material respects in relation to financial 

will continue to monitor developments in the governance area and carry out regular reviews  

reporting risks.

of governance policies and practices. 

The non-audit related fees paid to the auditor during the financial period (as detailed in Note 9 

Compliance with corporate governance codes, principles and recommendations

to the Financial Statements) were permitted non-audit services under Chorus’ External Auditor 

The NZSX Listing Rules require Chorus to include a statement in this report on whether the 

corporate governance principles adopted or followed by Chorus materially differ from the 

Corporate Governance Best Practice Code. Chorus considers that its corporate governance 

practices comply with the Code. Chorus also considers that its corporate governance practices 

comply with the FMA’s Corporate Governance in New Zealand Principles and Guidelines.

Independence Policy.

Delegation of authority

As described in the Board Charter, to allow for the effective day-to-day management and 

leadership of Chorus, the Board has delegated its authority, in part, to the CEO. The CEO  

may, in turn, sub-delegate authority to other Chorus people. Formal policies and procedures 

The ASX Listing Rules require Chorus to include a statement in this report disclosing the  

govern the parameters and operation of these delegations.

extent to which it has followed the ASX Corporate Governance Council’s Principles and 

Recommendations during the financial period. Chorus considers it complies with each  

Code of ethics

of the recommendations. 

Managing risk

Chorus expects its directors and employees to conduct themselves in accordance with the 

highest ethical standards. Chorus has Codes of Ethics for its directors and employees that  

set the expected standards for their professional conduct. These Codes are intended to  

Chorus has a Managing Risk Policy that mandates one framework for the management  

facilitate decisions that are consistent with Chorus’ values, business goals and legal and  

of risk in Chorus to: 

policy obligations. The director Code of Ethics is available at www.chorus.co.nz/governance.

•	 ensure	the	Board	sets	the	risk	appetite	and	reviews	the	principal	risks	annually;	

Chorus has communicated the Codes of Ethics to directors and employees and has provided 

•	

integrate	risk	management	in	line	with	the	Board’s	risk	appetite	into	structures,	 
policies, processes and procedures; and

training to its employees. Chorus encourages its people to report any unethical behaviour 

through a compliance function that investigates any such reports. 

•	 deliver	regular	principal	risk	reviews	and	monitoring.	

A whistle blowing policy allows for confidential reporting of serious misconduct or wrongdoing. 

Chorus has not received any reports of serious instances of unethical behaviour during the 

financial period.

THE CHORUS BOARD

Role	of	the	Board

Board Committees

The Board is appointed by Chorus’ shareholders and has statutory responsibility for the 

The Board currently has three standing Board Committees, as noted below. Each Board 

business and affairs of Chorus. The Board has overall responsibility for the strategy, culture, 

Committee has a Board-approved Charter and a chairman. The Board Committees assist the 

governance and performance of Chorus working with, and through, the CEO. 

Board by focusing on specific responsibilities in greater detail than is possible for the Board 

The Board and Board Committee Charters and other key governance documents are available 

as a whole. 

on Chorus’ website at www.chorus.co.nz/governance. The annex to the Board Charter 

Audit and Risk Management Committee

contains a diagram that illustrates the key governance documents and the roles and 

responsibilities of the Board and Board Committees.

The ARMC assists the Board in ensuring oversight of all matters relating to risk management, 

financial management and controls and the financial accounting, audit and reporting  

Board membership

of Chorus. 

The Board currently has seven directors – six independent directors and a managing  

All Committee members are non-executive directors. For information on Committee 

director. The Board has substantial managerial, financial, accounting and industry experience. 

members’ qualifications, see P.3.

See P.3 for more information on the skills and experience of the directors. 

The independence status of each director is noted in their biographies on P.3. For a director  

to be considered independent, the Board must affirmatively determine that the director does 

not have a disqualifying relationship (other than solely as a consequence of being a director).  

The disqualifying relationships are set out in the Board Charter. While the Board has not set 

financial materiality thresholds for determining independence, it considers the materiality 

basis of all relationships having regard to the materiality to Chorus, the director and the 

Members: Anne Urlwin (chairman), Jon Hartley and Sue Sheldon.

Human Resources and Compensation Committee

The Human Resources and Compensation Committee (HRCC) assists the Board  

in overseeing people policies and strategies, including remuneration frameworks. 

Members: Clayton Wakefield (chairman), Prue Flacks and Keith Turner. 

relevant person or organisation (eg customer, supplier or adviser) with which the director  

Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee

is related. Materiality is assessed in the context of each relationship and from the perspective 

of both parties to that relationship.

The Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee (NCGC) assists the Board  

in promoting and overseeing continuous improvement of good corporate governance. 

Members: Sue Sheldon (chairman), Prue Flacks and Jon Hartley. 

P. 7

 
Director restrictions

The Chorus Constitution provides that no person who is an ‘associated person’ of a  

person that provides telecommunications services in New Zealand (other than the services 

provided by Chorus) shall be appointed or hold office as a director. NZX has granted Chorus  

a waiver to allow the Chorus Constitution to include this restriction on the persons who  

may hold office as director.

Board and Board Committee meeting attendance

The table below sets out attendance at the Board and Board Committee meetings to  

30 June 2012. This table does not include details of any meetings held prior to demerger, 

when Chorus was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Telecom. 

Board Meetings

Special Board 
Meetings

ARMC

HRCC

NCGC

Total	number	of	 
meetings held

Sue Sheldon 
(chairman)

Anne Urlwin

Clayton Wakefield

Jon Hartley

Keith Turner

Mark Ratcliffe

Prue Flacks

5

5

5

5

5

4

4^

5

3 

3

3

3

1

3

3

3

4

4

4

-

3

-

4^

-

4

4*

-

4

-

4

4^

4

2

2

-

-

2

-

2^

2

*  Attended meetings as an observer and not as a Committee member.

^  Mark Ratcliffe was appointed as a director on 9 December 2011, after the first Board meeting, which 
he attended in his capacity as CEO. He is not a member of any Board Committees, but attends all 
Board Committee meetings as CEO and as an observer, and may be asked to leave at any time.

Trading in Chorus shares

All non-executive directors are encouraged to hold Chorus ordinary shares (Chorus Shares). 

Given the NZX waiver that Chorus was not required to prepare half yearly accounts during  

the financial period, Chorus directors have refrained from purchasing Chorus Shares during 

that time.

Directors are subject to limitations on their ability to deal in Chorus Shares and other relevant 

Chorus securities (Chorus Securities) by Chorus’ Insider Trading Policy, the New Zealand 

Securities Market Act 1988 and the Australian Corporations Act 2001. These limitations 

include the requirement that directors may not deal in Chorus Securities or the securities  

of another issuer while in possession of inside information about that entity.

As a matter of policy, Chorus also requires that directors, prior to dealing in Chorus Securities, 

notify and obtain consent from the chairman and that trading may only occur in accordance 

with Chorus’ Insider Trading Policy. 

All changes in any interests in Chorus Securities held by directors are required to be reported  

to the Board, the NZSX and the ASX.

Director induction and education

The Board seeks to ensure new directors are appropriately introduced to management and 

the Chorus business, that all directors are acquainted with relevant industry knowledge and 

economics and that they receive a copy of the Board and Board Committee Charters and the 

key governance documents. 

It is expected that all directors continuously educate themselves to ensure they have 

appropriate expertise to effectively perform their duties. 

In addition, visits to Chorus operations, briefings from key management and industry experts 

or key advisers to Chorus and educational and stakeholder visits, briefings or meetings will be 

arranged for the Board. 

Independent advice

A director may, with the chairman’s prior approval, take independent professional advice 

(including legal advice). A director may request the attendance of such an adviser at a Board or 

Board Committee meeting where this is necessary to fulfil their role and responsibilities for 

Chorus. The costs of any such adviser will be paid for by Chorus.

Review	and	evaluation	of	Board	performance

The chairman meets regularly with directors to discuss individual performance. 

The Board will annually review the Board’s performance, that of individual directors and Board 

Committees utilising a Board evaluation process to be developed and overseen by the NCGC.  

As Chorus has only been a standalone, publicly listed entity since demerger, no performance 

evaluations have been carried out yet. The first performance evaluations are expected to be 

carried out in FY13.

DIVERSITY AT CHORUS

Diversity and inclusiveness at Chorus

Chorus has a Board-approved Diversity and Inclusiveness Policy. Chorus believes that  

having a team of individuals working together who all have different experiences, views  

and self-reflections makes it stronger and better as an organisation. Chorus defines diversity  

as the characteristics that make one individual similar to or different from another. It defines 

Working	preferences

Chorus uses a tool to assess the  

working preferences of its people.  

This promotes diversity of thought,  

inclusion as the recognition that diverse backgrounds, experiences and perspectives lead to  

working style and contribution across 

a better experience of work for its people, makes teams stronger, leads to greater creativity 

teams, and understanding of how to 

and performance, contributes to a more meaningful relationship with its retail service provider 

leverage differences. 

customers and stakeholders, and ultimately lead to increased value to shareholders.

Valuing diversity is more than a moral imperative; it is also sensible business practice. 

The focus of the policy is to leverage differences as a competitive advantage through  

its attraction and development practices, develop inclusiveness as a core capability for  

its people leaders and as a channel to its people, and to continue to recognise individual 

contribution and performance.

The HRCC recommends measurable objectives to the Board to be set and assessed annually. 

I

V
D
A

The graphic here shows Chorus has the  

full spectrum of working preferences  

across the distribution. This fully validated 

self-assessment tool is a Team Management 
Index1 of the 348 contributors who had 

completed the workshops at the time of 

preparing this data.

                                E X P LORERS  

11%

9%

16%

S
R
E
S

4%

21%

3%

27%

9%

CONTROL L E R S

O

R
G
A
N
I
S
E
R
S

Diversity metrics as at 30 June 2012

The Board has set the following measurable objectives for achieving greater diversity at Chorus:

Measure

Description

Actual as at 30 June 2012

Benchmark

Age profiles

Median age

Employee satisfaction

Response to the diversity question  
“The work environment is very open  
and accepting of individual differences”

42.7 years

83%

Ethnicity by role

Organisational groupings by ethnicity

Not currently available

42 years. Statistics New Zealand National  
Labour Force Projections May 2010

79% Aon Hewitt Best Employer 

People leader population distribution =  
total company population distribution

Flexible working 
arrangements

Percentage of the population utilising flexible 
working arrangements

4.5% working part-time hours

4% working part-time hours

Gender by role

Organisational groupings by gender

Rookie ratio

Internal hire rate

The previous year’s intake by age,  
ethnicity and gender

39% 

  61% 

  all

34% 

  66% 

  people leaders

40% 

  60% 

  executive team

43% 

  57% 

  Board

50% 

  50% 

  non-executive Board

Average age 37.8 years

Gender 42% 

  58% 

Ethnicity not available

People leader population distribution =  
total company population distribution

No measure – for information

The previous year’s appointments identifying 
internal vs external hire rate

59% of all appointments have been internal.  
86% of roles in layers 1-3 were recruited internally.

66% of roles in layers 1-3

Chorus’ Diversity and Inclusiveness Policy can be found at www.chorus.co.nz/governance.

1  The distribution only reflects the Major Role preference of the 348 contributors – as opposed to a representation of their preference across all factors at all levels. For more information go to www.tms.co.nz

P. 8

(v)  The fee for being a member of the UFB Steering Committee was paid in addition to any  

CEO remuneration

Director

Sue Sheldon (chairman)

Anne Urlwin

Clayton Wakefield

Jon Hartley

Keith Turner

Mark Ratcliffe

Prue Flacks

Total

Notes:

REMUNERATION AT CHORUS

Directors’	fees	

The total remuneration available to non-executive directors was fixed at $980,000 and the 

initial fee structure was set out in the scheme booklet. At the time of demerger, NZX granted a 

waiver from the requirement to obtain shareholder approval for the remuneration of the Board 

Continued…

on the condition that the remuneration of the Board is approved at Chorus’ first annual meeting.

Human Resources and Compensation Committee

During the year ending 30 June 2012, the total remuneration earned by the directors  

of Chorus (in their capacity as such) was as follows:

•	 Chairman

•	 Member

Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee

ANNUAL FEE 
STRUCTURE 
 FROM  
1 JULY 2012
$

ANNUAL FEE 
STRUCTURE 
FROM  
1 DECEMBER 2011
$

21,000

10,500

15,500

8,000

20,000

8,000

15,000

7,500

Not applicable

Not applicable

31,000

30,000

•	 Chairman

•	 Member

UFB Steering Committee

•	 Chairman

•	 Member

Total	fees	$

116,666.67

72,916.67

70,000.00

64,166.67

80,500.00

-

Notes:
(i) 

The annual fee structure from 1 December 2011 was disclosed in the scheme booklet and 
applied to the seven month period ending 30 June 2012 (actual fees paid were a proportionate 
amount of these annual fees – see earlier table on directors fees). 

63,000.00

(ii)  From 1 July 2012:

467,250.01

•	 With	the	exception	of	the	chairman	of	the	Board,	directors	receive	a	fee	for	each	Board	

Committee of which the director is the chairman or a member from 1 July 2012.

•	 Directors	may	be	paid	an	additional	daily	rate	of	$2,400	for	additional	work	as	determined	
and approved by the chairman of the Board and where the payment is within the total  
fee pool available for the relevant financial year based on advice of the General Counsel  
& Company Secretary.

No director receives compensation in share options. No director (except the CEO) participates 

in a bonus or profit-sharing plan. 

No superannuation was paid to or other scheme for retirement benefits exist for any director 

(except for the CEO) in the seven months to 30 June 2012. 

Mark Ratcliffe commenced as the CEO of Chorus on 1 December 2012, on demerger  

from Telecom. 

Remuneration package for the financial period

Mark Ratcliffe’s remuneration as CEO consists of a mixture of fixed remuneration, short term 

incentives (STI) and long term incentives (LTI). The actual remuneration paid to Mark Ratcliffe 

in the financial period is as follows: 

Fixed remuneration (1 December 2011- 30 June 2012)

$433,351.37 (gross)

Short term incentive for the period (1 July 2011 - 30 June 2012, 
including time with Telecom) 

$661,000.00 (gross),  
paid 27 August 2012

Total remuneration received 

$1,094,351.37 (gross)

The 2012 short term incentive payment includes a one off $98,507 (gross) payment  

to Mark Ratcliffe for his performance during the demerger period. 

208,000

104,000

200,000

100,000

In addition, in the seven months to 30 June 2012, payments totalling $10,574.50  

with regard to KiwiSaver and medical insurance were made on behalf of Mark Ratcliffe.

The following LTI liabilities are due to be calculated and paid in the following manner.  

They are all cash payments:

31,000

15,500

25,000

10,000

Continued…

(i)  No fees were paid by Chorus to any director prior to demerger. The figures shown are for  
the seven months to 30 June 2012, are gross amounts and exclude GST where applicable.
(ii)  Directors are entitled to be paid or reimbursed for reasonable travelling, accommodation and 
other expenses incurred in relation to management of Chorus without requiring authorisation 
of shareholders. Any such expenses are not included in the table above.

(iii)  Following demerger all non-executive directors received a base fee. 
(iv)  Board Committee fees are not paid to the chairman of the Board. Directors (other than the 

chairman of the Board) received the single highest applicable fee if they were the chairman  
or a member of more than one Board Committee. 

Board Committee fee.

(vi)  Directors (other than the CEO) do not receive any other benefits.
(vii)  Mark Ratcliffe, as CEO, does not receive any remuneration in his capacity as a director of 

Chorus. The remuneration of the CEO is detailed below.

The HRCC reviews the remuneration of directors based on criteria developed by that Committee.

For FY13, the Board has sought advice on non-executive director remuneration from 

independent consultants. Based on that advice, the overall fee pool for the Board for FY13  

is unchanged, subject to obtaining shareholder approval at Chorus’ first annual meeting.  

The Board has approved, within that total fee pool, modest fee changes to the fee structure 

for FY13 as follows:

ANNUAL FEE 
STRUCTURE 
 FROM  
1 JULY 2012
$

ANNUAL FEE 
STRUCTURE 
FROM  
1 DECEMBER 2011
$

Base	fees:

Chairman of the Board

Non-executive director

Board	Committee	fees:

Audit and Risk Management Committee

•	 Chairman

•	 Member

Grant year

Vesting year

Detail

2010

2012

2011

2012

2011

2014

A cash LTI grant was made to Mark Ratcliffe by Telecom in September 2010 with a two year 
vesting period. Chorus carried across a liability for the value of $124,233.00 (gross) with a 
qualifying date of 15 September 2012. Payment was to be based on the establishment of 
Chorus and performance to be determined by the Board.

A cash LTI grant was made by Telecom in November 2011, with a one year vesting period  
(1 December 2012). Chorus carried across a liability for the value of $200,000.00 (gross).  
Mark Ratcliffe has given an undertaking, on vesting, to use the funds for the purchase 
of Chorus Shares which must be retained for the term of his employment. There are no 
performance hurdles. The cash value was converted into Equity Equivalent Units (EEUs) based 
on dividing the target value by the volume weighted average sale price (VWAP) of Chorus 
Shares for the first twenty days of trading, following demerger.

A cash LTI grant was made by Telecom in September 2011. Chorus carried across a liability for 
the value of $250,000.00 (gross). The cash value was converted into EEUs based on dividing 
the target value by the VWAP of Chorus Shares for the first twenty days of trading, following 
demerger. Performance will be assessed by the Board to determine the proportion of this 
value to be paid out.

From 1 July 2012 the CEO remuneration package will be:

Item

Detail

Fixed annual remuneration

$783,750.00 (gross)

Total base remuneration – additional costs

Incorporating KiwiSaver and medical insurance and noting that KiwiSaver employer 
contributions change to 3% as from April 2013.

Potential value

The Board has determined that this will 
be paid out at the maximum value of 
$124,233.00 (gross) in September 2012.

65,825 EEUs converted back into a cash  
value at vesting based on share price 
performance at that time.

A maximum of 82,281 EEUs converted back 
into a cash value at vesting based on share 
price performance at that time.

Potential Value

$783,750.00 (gross)

~$22,000.00 (gross)

Short term incentives

The STI target value for Mark Ratcliffe for the FY13 year is $438,900.00 (gross). Payment, 
like all Chorus employees, is subject to company performance and his own performance, 
assessed by the Chorus Board. Performance and payment will be calculated in August 2013 
for the year commencing 1 July 2012.

Payment may range from 0 to 2.8 times the 
target value; that is $0 - $1,228,920.00 (gross)

P. 9

Item

Detail

Long term incentives*.

The LTI grant to Mark Ratcliffe in September 2012 will have a target value of $349,779.00 
(gross). This figure was arrived at by the Board incorporating a base value of 33.33% of fixed 
annual remuneration and then taking into account company performance and individual 
performance in between 1 December 2011 and 30 June 2012. This cash grant will be 
converted into EEUs based on dividing the target value by the VWAP of Chorus Shares for 
period 27 August 2012 to 21 September 2012. This grant has a three year vesting period  
(25 September 2015) and has performance hurdles agreed with HRCC.

Potential Value

EEUs converted back into a cash value at 
vesting based on share price performance  
at that time.

* The Chorus LTI scheme is under review by the Board. The 2012 LTI grant which will take  
place in September 2012 replicates the previous 2011 pre demerger Telecom LTI scheme as an 
interim measure. 

Employees can choose to receive telephone concessions including contributions  

towards telephone line rental, national and international phone calls and online services.  

In addition, certain employees receive contributions towards membership of the Marram  

The CEO remuneration package is reviewed annually by the HRCC and Board, after seeking 

Trust (a community healthcare and holiday accommodation provider), contributions to  

advice from external remuneration specialists and reviewing CEO and Chorus’ performance. 

the Government Superannuation Fund (a legacy benefit provided to a small number of 

In future years, the target values may be revised due to any future adjustments to the CEO 

employees) and, if the individual is a KiwiSaver member, a contribution of up to 2% of gross 

earnings towards that individual’s KiwiSaver scheme. These amounts are not included in  

these remuneration figures. 

Any benefits received by employees that do not have an attributable value are not included. 

remuneration package and components.

Chorus remuneration model

The Board has reviewed the remuneration model for Chorus and has established principles  

of alignment to shareholder outcomes, simplicity, clarity, and fairness, and remuneration 

outcomes are based on performance. 

All Chorus employees have a fixed remuneration and STI component in their remuneration 

package. A limited number of employees also have an LTI component.

Fixed remuneration

The fixed remuneration model is informed and adjusted each year based on data from 

multiple remuneration specialists. Employees’ fixed remuneration is based on a matrix  

of their own performance and their current remuneration position in market range. 

STI plan

STI values are calculated as a percentage of fixed remuneration and determined based  

on the complexity of the roles. Employees’ STI payments are determined following review  

of company performance and individual performance and may be paid out at a multiplier  

of 0x to 2.8x. This model is focussed on articulating performance goals, driving for outcomes 

and rewarding delivery.

LTI plan

Chorus operates an LTI plan for its Executives and an identified number of senior leaders. 

Certain Telecom people who transferred to Chorus as part of the demerger, were granted  

Remuneration Range 
$

1,420,001-1,430,000

540,001-550,000

510,001-520,000

490,001-500,000

440,001-450,000

430,001-440,000

400,001-410,000

340,001-350,000

310,001-320,000

300,001-310,000

280,001-290,000

270,001-280,000

260,001-270,000

LTIs under a scheme operated by Telecom. Chorus has assumed liability for these grants.

250,001-260,000

Managing	performance

Chorus’ performance management process is based on all Chorus people having a 

performance and development plan for the year, which is regularly reviewed with their people 

240,001-250,000

230,001-240,000

220,001-230,000

leader. The performance plan is developed initially by the individual after participating in ‘Line 

210,001-220,000

of Sight’ sessions which enable them to link Chorus’ strategy with their day to day work and 

focus areas. The performance plan includes both outcome based objectives and behavioural 

measures, along with a development plan. End of year performance reviews are undertaken 

for all Chorus people. In these the people leader for the individual seeks additional feedback 

and participates in a peer review and moderation process, resulting in an overall rating and 

remuneration recommendation that impacts the individual’s total reward (fixed remuneration 

and target STI). 

This same process was undertaken for the Chorus executive team, with the CEO making 

recommendations to the HRCC for the executive team and the chairman of the HRCC leading 

on the performance review of the CEO and making recommendations to the Board. This 

allows the Board to provide input into these individuals’ performance outcomes, total reward 

approvals (fixed remuneration, target STI and LTI) and development plans.

Employee remuneration range

The table below shows the number of employees and former employees who, in their 

capacity as employees, received remuneration and other benefits in excess of $100,000 

during the seven month period ending 30 June 2012. For information purposes, the table  

also includes the estimated number of employees based on annualised remuneration  

for the Chorus employees for a 12 month period.

200,001-210,000

190,001-200,000

180,001-190,000

170,001-180,000

160,001-170,000

150,001-160,000

140,001-150,000

130,001-140,000

120,001-130,000

110,001-120,000

100,000-110,000

Total

Number	of	employees	 
(based on actual payments to 
employees	for	seven	months	
ended 30 June 2012)

Estimated	number	of	 
employees (based on estimated 
annualised remuneration payable 
to employees)

1

1

1

1

1

2

1

1

2

1

1

2

1

6

2

8

7

8

12

11

10

11

12

21

25

44

35

42

270

1

1

2

2

1

1

1

5

3

11

28

DISCLOSURES

Directors
Directors during the year ending 30 June 2012

The current directors are listed on P.3. The following people were directors who resigned  
during the year ending 30 June 2012.

Director

Kevin Roberts

Murray Horn

Paul Reynolds

Ronald Spithill

Wayne Boyd

Date	of	Appointment 

Date	of	Resignation

1 July 2011

1 July 2011

1 July 2011

1 July 2011

1 July 2011

1 December 2011

1 December 2011

1 December 2011

1 December 2011

1 December 2011

Indemnities and insurance

As permitted by the Chorus Constitution, Chorus has entered into deeds of indemnity with each  
of the directors for potential liabilities or costs they may incur for acts or omissions in their capacity 
as directors. 

Deeds of indemnity have also been given to certain senior staff for potential liabilities and costs 
they may incur for acts or omissions in their capacity as employees of Chorus, directors of Chorus 

subsidiaries or as directors of non-Chorus companies in which Chorus holds interests.

Chorus has a directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy in place. This provides insurance for the 
liabilities of the directors and employees of Chorus for acts or omissions in their capacity as directors 
or employees. It does not cover dishonest, fraudulent, malicious or wilful acts or omissions.

Director shareholding as at 30 June 2012

As at 30 June 2012, directors had a relevant interest (as defined in the Securities Markets Act 1988)  
in Chorus Shares as follows:

Director

Interest

Clayton Wakefield

Legal and beneficial interest

Keith Turner

Mark Ratcliffe

Total

Legal Interest

Beneficial interest

Number 

2,004

5,500

16,778

24,282

As at 30 June 2012 directors had a relevant interest representing approximately 0.006% of the 
Chorus Shares outstanding.

P. 10

Interests Register

Directors disclosed, pursuant to section 140 of the Companies Act 1993, an interest or cessation  
of interest in the following entities during the seven months ended 30 June 2012:

Sue Sheldon: FibreTech Holdings Ltd and subsidiaries (director), Contact Energy Ltd (director), 
Freightways Ltd (chairman), Paymark Ltd (director), Sue Sheldon Advisory Ltd (director),  
Reserve Bank of New Zealand (deputy chairman).

Anne Urlwin: Lakes Environmental Ltd (chairman), Naylor Love Ltd (director), Naylor Love 
Construction Ltd (director), Naylor Love Enterprises Ltd (chairman), Meridian Energy Ltd (ceased  
to be a director), Southern Response Earthquake Services Ltd (director), SR 1 Ltd (director),  
SR 2 Ltd (director*), SR 3 Ltd (director*), SR 4 Ltd (director*), SR 5 Ltd (director*), SR 6 Ltd (director*), 
SR 7 Ltd (director*), SR 8 Ltd (director*), SR 9 Ltd (director*), SR 10 Ltd (director*), SR 11 Ltd (director*), 
Ngai Tahu Te Runanga Audit & Risk Committee (independent chairman).

Clayton Wakefield: Walsh Financial Services Ltd (director and shareholder), Wakefield & Walsh Ltd 
(director and shareholder), Techspace Ltd (director and shareholder), Techspace Investments Ltd 
(director and shareholder), Techspace Consulting Ltd (executive director and shareholder), Endace 
Ltd (director), Wakefield Walsh Family Trust (trustee and beneficiary).

Jon Hartley: ASB Bank Ltd (deputy chairman), Mighty River Power Ltd (director), Trango Capital Ltd 
(director, shareholder and trustee of a shareholder), VisionFund International Ltd (vice chairman), 
VisionFund Cambodia Ltd (director), Hartley Family Trust (trustee), Wellington City Mission (Anglican) 
Trust Board (trustee), Mission Residential Care Ltd (director), World Vision NZ (trustee), Yorkshire 
Trust (trustee), Sovereign Assurance Company Ltd (deputy chairman).

Keith Turner: Solar City New Zealand Ltd (chairman), Auckland International Airport Ltd (deputy 
chairman), Waitaki Wind Ltd (director), Fisher & Paykel Appliances Holdings Ltd (chairman), Spark 
Infrastructure Pty Ltd (director).

Mark Ratcliffe: Telecom Corporation of New Zealand Ltd (shareholder), Matapouri Family Trust 
(trustee and beneficiary), Telstra Corporation Ltd (shareholder).

Prue Flacks: Mighty River Power Ltd (director), Bank of New Zealand (director), BNZ Life Insurance 
Ltd (chairman).

*  Anne Urlwin ceased to be a director of these companies after 30 June 2012.

Shares and shareholders
Stock exchange listings and American Depositary Receipts

Chorus Shares have a dual listing on the NZSX and on the ASX. Chorus trades under the ticker ‘CNU’.

American Depositary Shares (ADSs), each representing five ordinary shares and evidenced by 
American Depositary Receipts (ADRs), are not listed but are traded on the over-the-counter (OTC) 
market in the United States under the ticker symbol ‘CHRYY’. Chorus’ depositary is the Bank of  
New York Mellon.

NZX waivers

A summary of all waivers granted and published by NZX within or relied upon by Chorus in the 
12 months preceding the date two months before the publication date of the annual report, are 
published on Chorus’ website at www.chorus.co.nz. This summary will be published for 12 months 
following publication of this annual report.

ASX disclosures

Chorus has been admitted to the official list of the ASX. As a result, Chorus is required to make the 
following disclosures:

•	 Chorus’	place	of	incorporation	is	New	Zealand.

•	 Chorus	is	not	subject	to	Chapters	6,	6A,	6B	and	6C	of	the	Australian	Corporations	Act	2001	
dealing with the acquisition of shares (including substantial shareholdings and takeovers).

•	 Chorus’	Constitution	contains	limitations	on	the	acquisition	of	securities,	as	disclosed	below.

•	 Chorus	used	the	cash	and	assets	in	a	form	readily	convertible	to	cash	that	it	had	at	the	time	 

of admission in a way consistent with its business objectives as set out in the scheme booklet.

Registration as a foreign company

Chorus has registered with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) as a foreign 
company. Chorus has been issued an Australian Registered Body Number (ARBN) of 152 485 848.

Quoted securities

As at 30 June 2012 there were 385,082,123 Chorus Shares on issue.

Each Chorus Share confers on its holder the right to attend and vote at a meeting of Chorus, 
including the right to cast one vote on a poll on any resolution.

Non-standard designation

NZX has attached a ‘non-standard’ designation to the listing of the Chorus Shares owing to the 
ownership restrictions in Chorus’ Constitution, as described below. 

Chorus’ constitutional ownership restrictions

Chorus’ Constitution includes the ownership restrictions that prohibit any person:

•	

from	having	a	relevant	interest	in	10%	or	more	of	Chorus	Shares,	unless	the	prior	written	 
consent of the New Zealand Government is obtained; or

•	 other	than	a	New	Zealand	national,	from	having	a	relevant	interest	in	more	than	49.9%	of	 

Chorus Shares, unless the prior written consent of the New Zealand Government is obtained.

If the Board or the New Zealand Government determines there are reasonable grounds for believing 
that a person has a relevant interest in voting shares in excess of the ownership restrictions, the 
Board may, after following certain procedures, prohibit the exercise of voting rights (in which 
case the voting rights shall vest in the chairman) and may force the sale of shares. The Board may 
also decline to register a transfer of shares if it reasonably believes the transfer would breach the 
ownership restrictions.

NZX has granted Chorus waivers to allow the Chorus Constitution to include the power of forfeiture, 
the restrictions on transferability of Chorus Shares and the Board’s power to prohibit the exercise of 
voting rights relating to these ownership restrictions.

Chorus has been advised by the Crown that AMP Capital Holdings Ltd and its related companies 
have been granted approval, should they choose to exercise it in future, to acquire a relevant interest 
in 10% or more (but not exceeding 15%) of Chorus Shares.

Unquoted securities

Security

Number issued 
during the 
financial period

Holder

CFH Equity Securities

6,365,892 

Crown Fibre Holdings Ltd 

CFH Debt Securities

6,365,892

Crown Fibre Holdings Ltd 

CFH Warrants

272,207*

Crown Fibre Holdings Ltd 

Percentage 
held

100%

100%

100%

*  The CFH warrants have been issued in two series, with different repayment schedules.  

On 30 June 2020 one series will be cancelled depending on whether the 20% fibre up-take  
threshold is met.

The CFH equity securities are a unique class of security that carry no right to vote at meetings of 
holders of Chorus Shares but entitle the holder to a right to a repayment preference on liquidation. 

The CFH debt securities are unsecured, non-interest bearing and carry no voting rights at meetings 
of holders of Chorus Shares.

The CFH warrants are an option to acquire Chorus Shares on a specified exercise date at a set  
strike price. 

The terms of the issue for each of the CFH equity securities, CFH debt securities and the CFH 
warrants are set out in the subscription agreement with CFH. For more information see pages  
139 - 142 of the scheme booklet.

Distribution of shareholders and shareholdings as at 28 August 2012

Number  
of	holders

Number	of	 
shares held

%	of	issued	capital

Size	of	shareholding

1 to 1,000

1,001 to 5,000

5,001 to 10,000

10,001 to 100,000

100,001 and over

Total shareholders

28,369 

6,955 

1,321 

813 

65 

37,523 

8,812,033 

16,026,164 

9,771,319 

18,893,781 

331,578,826 

385,082,123 

2.29

4.15

2.54

4.91

86.11

100

Substantial security holders as at 28 August 2012

Based upon notices received, the following persons are deemed to be substantial security holders,  
in accordance with Section 26 of the Securities Markets Act 1988: 

Substantial security holder

Number	of	voting	securities

Date	of	notice

AMP Capital Investors 

43,371,379

26 July 2012

Schroder Investment Management 
Australia Ltd

26,952,232

21 December 2011

Bank of New York Mellon

19,311,109

31 May 2012

Twenty largest registered shareholders as at 28 August 2012

Rank

Holder Name

National Nominees New Zealand Ltd

JP Morgan Chase Bank NA

HSBC Nominees (New Zealand) Ltd

Holding

%

62,763,862

16.29

41,216,955

10.70

23,435,697

6.08

HSBC Nominees (New Zealand) Ltd A/C State Street

21,240,619

5.51

Accident Compensation Corporation

National Nominees Ltd

JP Morgan Nominees Australia Ltd

AMP Life Ltd

New Zealand Superannuation Fund Nominees Ltd

BNP Paribas Nominees (NZ) Ltd

BNP Paribas Noms Pty Ltd

AMP Investments Strategic Equity Growth Fund

FNZ Custodians Ltd

Citibank Nominees (New Zealand) Ltd

TEA Custodians Ltd

Westpac NZ Shares 2002 Wholesale Trust

HSBC Custody Nominees (Australia) Ltd

Citicorp Nominees Pty Ltd

Forsyth Barr Custodians Ltd

18,530,630

4.81

15,762,202

4.09

14,276,989

3.70

9,951,887

2.58

9,111,766

2.36

8,239,461

2.13

7,115,007

1.84

6,826,199

1.77

6,780,577

1.76

6,504,138

1.68

6,369,149

1.65

5,618,511

1.45

4,957,502

1.28

4,599,468

1.19

4,505,075

1.16

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

Premier Nominees Ltd -Onepath Wholesale Australasian Shr Fund

4,370,095

1.13

Shareholders holding less than a marketable parcel

As at 28 August 2012, there were 6,359 shareholders holding between 1 and 99 Chorus Shares  
(a minimum holding under the NZSX Listing Rules) and, based on the market price of A$2.60, there 
were 12,354 holders that held less than a marketable parcel of A$500 of Chorus Shares under the 
ASX Listing Rules. 

On-market buy-back: There is no current on-market buy-back.

Net tangible assets per security

As at 30 June 2012, the consolidated net tangible assets per share was NZ$0.90. Net tangible assets 
per share is a non-GAAP financial measure and is not prepared in accordance with NZ IFRS.

Company Secretary

Vanessa Oakley

Donations

Chorus made no donations for the seven months ending 30 June 2012.

Subsidiaries
Chorus New Zealand Ltd

Directors: 
Mark Ratcliffe (Chairman), Andrew Carroll, Brian Hall, Vanessa Oakley and Lucy Riddiford (as alternate 
director for Vanessa Oakley).

Director Remuneration:
The directors are all employees and do not receive any remuneration in their capacity as directors  
of Chorus New Zealand Ltd.

Directors interests:
Mark Ratcliffe: Chorus Ltd (shareholder), Telecom Corporation of New Zealand Ltd (shareholder), 
Telstra Corporation Ltd (shareholder), Matapouri Family Trust (trustee and beneficiary).

Andrew Carroll: Chorus Ltd (shareholder).

Brian Hall: Chorus Ltd* (shareholder), Telecom Corporation of New Zealand Ltd (shareholder).

Lucy Riddiford: Chorus Ltd* (shareholder), Telecom Corporation of New Zealand Ltd* (shareholder).

Vanessa Oakley: Chorus Ltd (shareholder), Telecom Corporation of New Zealand Ltd (shareholder), 
First Foundation (unpaid mentor).

* Disclosed after 30 June 2012.

Indemnities and Insurance:
See Indemnities and Insurance on P.10 for further information.

P. 11

DIRECTORY

Registered Offices

New Zealand

Level 9, North Tower

Datacom House, 

68 - 86 Jervois Quay

Wellington 6011

New Zealand

Phone: +64 4 471 0220

Australia

C/- Allens Corporate Services Pty Limited

Level 5, Deutsche Bank Place

126 Phillip Street

Sydney

NSW 2000

Australia

Phone: +61 2 9230 4000

Registrars

New Zealand

Depository

BNY Mellon Shareowner Services

Computershare Investor Services Limited

PO Box 358516

Pittsburgh, PA 15252-8516

United States

Phone:  +1 201 680 6825 

Email:   shrrelations@bnymellon.com

www.bnymellon.com/shareowner

Private Bag 92119

Auckland 1142

New Zealand

Phone:  +64 9 488 8777

Fax:  

+64 9 488 8787

Email:   enquiry@computershare.co.nz

www.investorcentre.com/nz

Australia

Computershare Investor Services Pty Limited

GPO Box 3329

Melbourne 8060

Australia

Freephone: 1 800 501 366

Fax:  

+61 3 9473 2500

E-mail:   enquiry@computershare.co.nz

www.investorcentre.com/nz

CHO 1590 / SEPTEMBER 2012