Coherent
Annual Report 2016

Plain-text annual report

8JAN201710170953 Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders March 2, 2017 8:00 a.m. Hyatt Regency Santa Clara 5101 Great America Parkway Santa Clara, CA 95054 MATTERS TO BE VOTED ON: 1. 2. 3. 4. To elect the seven directors named in the proxy statement; To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2017; To approve on a non-binding, advisory basis, our named executive officer compensation; To approve on a non-binding, advisory basis, the frequency with which stockholders will vote on our named executive officer compensation; and 5. To transact such other business as may properly be brought before the meeting and any adjournment(s) thereof. The foregoing items of business are more fully described in the Proxy Statement accompanying this Notice. Stockholders of record at the close of business on January 19, 2017 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting and at any adjournments or postponements thereof. All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the meeting. However, to ensure your representation at the meeting, you are urged to mark, sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card as promptly as possible in the postage-prepaid envelope enclosed for that purpose or follow the instructions on the enclosed proxy card to vote by telephone or via the Internet. Any stockholder of record attending the meeting may vote in person even if he or she has returned a proxy. Please note, however, that if your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or other nominee and you wish to vote at the meeting, you must obtain a proxy issued in your name from that record holder. Santa Clara, California January 26, 2017 Sincerely, 8JAN201712031820 John R. Ambroseo President and Chief Executive Officer Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to Be Held on March 2, 2017 The proxy statement and annual report to stockholders are available at www.proxyvote.com. YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT In order to assure your representation at the meeting, you are requested to complete, sign and date the enclosed proxy card as promptly as possible and return it in the enclosed envelope or follow the instructions on the enclosed proxy card to vote by telephone or via the Internet. Any stockholder attending the Annual Meeting may vote in person even if he or she returned a proxy card. TABLE OF CONTENTS 10JAN201715204550GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PROPOSAL ONE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Election of Directors 3 7 PROPOSAL TWO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Ratification of the Appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm PROPOSAL THREE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Approval on a Non-Binding, Advisory Basis, Our Named Executive Officer Compensation PROPOSAL FOUR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Approval on a Non-Binding, Advisory Basis, the Frequency with which Stockholders Will Vote on Our Named Executive Officer Compensation SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT . 22 OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 SUMMARY COMPENSATION AND EQUITY TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS . . . . . . . . . . 49 OTHER MATTERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 2 PROXY STATEMENT General Information About the Meeting General The enclosed Proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors (the ‘‘Board’’) of Coherent, Inc. for use at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the ‘‘Annual Meeting’’ or ‘‘meeting’’) to be held at 8:00 a.m., local time, on March 2, 2017 at the Hyatt Regency Santa Clara, 5101 Great America Parkway, Santa Clara, California 95054, and at any adjournment(s) thereof, for the purposes set forth herein and in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Our telephone number is (408) 764-4000. These proxy solicitation materials were first mailed on or about January 26, 2017 to all stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Who May Vote at the Meeting? You are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting if our records show that you held your shares as of the close of business on our record date, January 19, 2017 (the ‘‘Record Date’’). On the Record Date, 24,553,828 shares of our common stock, $0.01 par value, were issued and outstanding. What Does Each Share of Common Stock I Own Represent? On all matters, each share has one vote, unless, with respect to Proposal One regarding the election of directors, cumulative voting is in effect. See ‘‘Election of Directors—Vote Required’’ for a description of cumulative voting rights with respect to the election of directors. How Does a Stockholder Vote? Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote by proxy to ensure your vote is counted. If you are entitled to vote, you may do so as follows: • Through your broker: If your shares are held through a broker, bank or other nominee (commonly referred to as held in ‘‘street name’’), you will receive instructions from them that you must follow to have your shares voted. If you want to vote in person, you will need to obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee and bring it to the meeting. • In person: Attend the Annual Meeting and, if you request, we will give you a ballot at the time of voting. If you have previously submitted a proxy card, you must notify us at the Annual Meeting that you intend to cancel your prior proxy and vote by ballot at the meeting. • Returning a Proxy Card: Simply complete, sign and date the enclosed proxy card and return it promptly in the envelope provided. If your signed proxy card is received before the Annual Meeting, the designated proxies will vote your shares as you direct. • Using the Telephone: Dial toll-free 1-800-690-6903 using a touch-tone phone and follow the recorded instructions. You will be asked to provide the control number from the enclosed proxy card. • Through the Internet: Go to www.proxyvote.com to complete an electronic proxy card. You will be asked to provide the control number from the enclosed proxy card. For telephone or Internet use, your vote must be received by 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on March 1, 2017 to be counted. If you return a signed and dated proxy card without marking any voting directions, your shares will be voted ‘‘for’’ the election of all seven nominees for director, ‘‘for’’ Proposals Two and Three and for ‘‘Abstain’’ with respect to Proposal Four. 3 General Information Matters to be Presented at the Meeting We are not aware of any matters to be presented at the meeting other than those described in this proxy statement. If any other matter is properly presented at the Annual Meeting, your proxy holders (one of the individuals named on your proxy card) will vote your shares in their discretion. The cost of this solicitation will be borne by us. We may reimburse brokerage firms and other persons representing beneficial owners of shares for their expenses in forwarding solicitation material to such beneficial owners. In addition, proxies may be solicited by certain of our directors, officers and regular employees, without additional compensation, personally or by telephone, e-mail or facsimile. Revoking Your Proxy If you hold your shares in street name, you must follow the instructions of your broker, bank or other nominee to revoke your voting instructions. If you are a holder of record and wish to revoke your proxy instructions, you must (i) advise the Corporate Secretary in writing at our principal executive offices at 5100 Patrick Henry Dr., Santa Clara, California 95054 before the proxies vote your shares at the meeting, (ii) timely deliver later-dated proxy instructions or (iii) attend the meeting and vote your shares in person. Attendance at the Annual Meeting All stockholders of record as of the Record Date may attend the Annual Meeting. Please note that cameras, recording devices and similar electronic devices will not be permitted at the Annual Meeting. No items will be allowed into the Annual Meeting that might pose a concern for the safety of those attending. Additionally, to attend the meeting you will need to bring identification and proof sufficient to us that you were a stockholder of record as of the Record Date or that you are a duly authorized representative of a stockholder of record as of the Record Date. For directions to attend the Annual Meeting or other questions, please contact Investor Relations by telephone at (408) 764-4110 no later than noon (California time) on March 1, 2017. Quorum; Abstentions; Broker Non-Votes Our bylaws provide that stockholders holding a majority of the shares of common stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote on the Record Date constitute a quorum at meetings of stockholders. Votes will be counted by the inspector of election appointed for the Annual Meeting, who will separately count ‘‘For’’ and ‘‘Against’’ votes, abstentions and broker non-votes, and with respect to Proposal Four, votes for ‘‘1 year’’, ‘‘2 years’’ and ‘‘3 years.’’ A ‘‘broker non-vote’’ occurs when a nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote because the nominee does not have discretionary voting power with respect to the proposal and has not received instructions with respect to the proposal from the beneficial owner. Abstentions will not be taken into account in determining the outcome of the election of directors and will have no effect on the outcome of Proposals Two, Three and Four. We intend to separately report abstentions and our Compensation and H.R. Committee will generally view abstentions as neutral when considering the results of Proposal Three. Broker non-votes represented by submitted proxies will not be taken into account in determining the outcome of any proposal. 4 Deadline for Receipt of Stockholder Proposals In order to submit stockholder proposals for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (‘‘SEC Rule 14a-8’’) for the annual meeting to be held in fiscal 2018, written materials must be received by the Corporate Secretary at the Company’s principal office in Santa Clara, California no later than September 28, 2017. Stockholder proposals must otherwise comply with the requirements of SEC Rule 14a-8. Proposals must be addressed to: Bret DiMarco, Corporate Secretary, Coherent, Inc., 5100 Patrick Henry Dr., Santa Clara, California 95054. Simply submitting a proposal does not guarantee its inclusion. regards Section 2.15 of the Company’s bylaws also establishes an advance notice procedure with to director nominations and stockholder proposals that are not submitted for inclusion in the proxy statement, but that a stockholder instead wishes to present directly from the floor at any Annual Meeting. To be properly brought before the Annual Meeting to be held in fiscal 2018, a notice of the nomination or the matter the stockholder wishes to present at the meeting must be delivered to the Corporate Secretary (see above), no later than the close of business on the 45th day (December 12, 2017), nor earlier than the close of business on the 75th day (November 12, 2017), prior to the one year anniversary of the date these proxy materials were first mailed by us, unless the annual meeting of stockholders is held prior to January 31, 2018 or after May 1, 2018, in which case, the proposal must be received by us not earlier than the 120th day prior to the annual Eliminating Duplicative Proxy Materials To reduce the expense of delivering duplicate voting materials to our stockholders who may hold shares of Coherent common stock in more than one stock account, we are delivering only one set of the proxy solicitation materials to certain stockholders who share an address, unless otherwise requested. A separate proxy card is included in the voting materials for each of these stockholders. We will promptly deliver, upon written or oral request, a separate copy of the annual report or this proxy statement to a stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the documents was delivered. To obtain an additional copy, you General Information the tenth day meeting and not later than the later of the 90th day prior to the following public annual meeting and announcement of the date the annual meeting will be held and must otherwise be in compliance with applicable laws and regulations in order to be considered for inclusion in the proxy statement and form of proxy relating to that meeting. We have not received any notice regarding any such matters to be brought at the meeting on March 2, 2017. If a stockholder who has notified us of his or her intention to present a proposal at an Annual Meeting does not appear to present his or her proposal at such meeting, we need not present the proposal for vote at such meeting. The Chair of the Annual Meeting has the final discretion whether or not to allow any matter to be considered at the meeting which did not timely comply with all applicable notice requirements. If a stockholder wishes only to recommend a candidate for consideration by the Governance and Nominating Committee as a potential nominee for the Company’s Board, see the procedures discussed ‘‘Proposal One—Election of Directors—Board Meetings and Committees—Process for Stockholders to Recommend Candidates for Election to the Board of Directors.’’ in to the proxyholders The attached proxy card grants discretionary authority to vote on any matter raised at the Annual Meeting, including proposals which are timely raised at the meeting, but did not meet the deadline for inclusion in this proxy statement. may write us at 5100 Patrick Henry Drive, Santa Clara, California 95054, Attn: Investor Relations, or contact our Investor Relations at department (408) 764-4110. telephone by Similarly, if you share an address with another stockholder and have received multiple copies of our proxy materials, you may contact us at the address or telephone number specified above to request that only a single copy of these materials be delivered to your address in the future. Stockholders sharing a single address may revoke their consent to receive a single copy of our proxy materials in the future at any time by 5 General Information contacting our distribution agent, Broadridge, either by calling toll-free at 1-800-542-1061, or by writing to Broadridge, Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. It is our understanding that Broadridge will remove such stockholder from the Householding program within 30 days of receipt of such written notice, after which each such stockholder will receive an individual copy of our proxy materials. Electronic Delivery of Proxy Materials In an effort to reduce paper mailed to your home and help lower printing and postage costs, we are offering stockholders the convenience of viewing online proxy statements, annual reports and related materials. With your consent, we can stop sending future paper copies of these documents. To participate during the voting season, registered stockholders may follow the instructions when voting online. Incorporation by Reference To the extent that this proxy statement has been or will be specifically incorporated by reference into any other filing of Coherent with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’), the sections of this proxy statement entitled ‘‘Report of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors’’ (to the extent permitted by the rules of the SEC) and ‘‘Compensation Discussion and Analysis’’ shall not be deemed to be so incorporated (other than in our annual report on Form 10-K), unless specifically provided otherwise in such filing. FURTHER INFORMATION We will provide without charge to each stockholder solicited by these proxy solicitation materials a copy of our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 1, 2016 without exhibits and any amendments thereto upon request of such stockholder made in writing to Coherent, Inc., 5100 Patrick Henry Drive, Santa Clara, California 95054, Attn: Investor Relations. We will also furnish any exhibit to the annual report on Form 10-K if specifically requested in writing. You can also access our SEC filings, including our annual reports on Form 10-K, and all amendments thereto on the SEC website at www.sec.gov. IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MARCH 2, 2017 The proxy statement and annual report to stockholders are available at www.proxyvote.com. Stockholder List A list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available for examination by stockholders of record at the Annual Meeting. 6 PROPOSAL ONE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS Nominees Seven (7) members of our Board of Directors are to be elected at the Annual Meeting. Unless otherwise instructed, the proxy holders will vote the proxies received by them for the nominees named below. Each nominee has consented to be named a nominee in the proxy statement and to continue to serve as a director, if elected. If any nominee becomes unable or declines to serve as a director, if additional persons are nominated at the meeting or if stockholders are entitled to cumulate votes, the proxy holders intend to vote all proxies received by them in such a manner (in accordance with cumulative voting) as will ensure the election of as many of the nominees listed below as possible, and the specific nominees to be voted for will be determined by the proxy holders. We are not aware of any reason that any nominee will be unable or will decline to serve as a director. The term of office of each person elected as a director will continue until the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until a successor has been elected and qualified or until his or her earlier resignation or removal. There are no arrangements or understandings between any director or executive officer and any other person pursuant to which he or she is or was to be selected as a director or officer. The names of the nominees, all of whom are currently directors standing for re-election, and certain information about them are set forth below. All of the nominees have been unanimously recommended for nomination by the Board acting on the unanimous recommendation of the Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board. The committee consists solely of independent members of the Board. There are no family relationships among directors or executive officers of Coherent. Name Age Director Since Principal Occupation John R. Ambroseo Jay T. Flatley(3) Susan M. James(1)(2) L. William Krause(2)(3) Garry W. Rogerson(1)(2) Steve Skaggs(1) Sandeep Vij(3) 55 64 70 74 64 54 51 2002 2011 2008 2009 2004 2013 2004 President and Chief Executive Officer Executive Chairman of Illumina, Inc. Retired Audit Partner, Ernst & Young President of LWK Ventures Former Chief Executive Officer of Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. Former Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Atmel Corporation Former President and Chief Executive Officer of MIPS Technologies, Inc. (1) Member of the Audit Committee (2) Member of the Governance and Nominating Committee (3) Member of the Compensation and H.R. Committee Except as set forth below, each of our directors has been engaged in his or her principal occupation set forth above during the past five years. John R. Ambroseo. Mr. Ambroseo has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer as well as a member of the Board of Directors since October 2002. Mr. Ambroseo served as our Chief Operating Officer from June 2001 through September 2002. Mr. Ambroseo served as our Executive Vice 7 Proposal One Election of Directors President and as President and General Manager of the Coherent Photonics Group from September 2000 to June 2001. From September 1997 to September 2000, Mr. Ambroseo served as our Executive Vice President and as President and General Manager of the Coherent Laser Group. From March 1997 to September 1997, Mr. Ambroseo served as our Scientific Business Unit Manager. From August 1988, when Mr. Ambroseo joined us, until March 1997, he served as a Sales Engineer, Product Marketing Manager, National Sales Manager and Director of European Operations. Mr. Ambroseo received a Bachelor degree from SUNY-College at Purchase and a PhD in Chemistry from the University of Pennsylvania. Mr. Ambroseo’s status as our Chief Executive Officer, his over 25 year tenure with Coherent, his extensive knowledge of our products, technologies and end markets and his over a decade of service as a director of Coherent make him an invaluable member of our Board of Directors. Jay T. Flatley. Since 1999 Mr. Flatley has served as a member of the Board of Directors of Illumina, Inc., a leading developer, manufacturer and marketer of life science tools and integrated systems for the analysis of genetic variation and function and since March 2016, as Illumina’s Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors. From January 2016 to March 2016, he also served as Chairman of the Board of Directors. From 1999 until March 2016, Mr. Flatley was Illumina’s Chief Executive Officer. From 1999 to December 2013, Mr. Flatley also served as Illumina’s President. Prior to joining Illumina, Mr. Flatley was President, Chief Executive Officer, and a member of the Board of Directors of Molecular Dynamics, Inc., a NASDAQ-listed life sciences company focused on genetic discovery and analysis, from 1994 until its sale in 1998. Additionally, he was a co-founder of Molecular Dynamics and served in various other positions there from 1987 to 1994. From 1985 to 1987, he was Vice President of Engineering and Vice President of Strategic Planning at Plexus Computers, a UNIX computer company. Mr. Flatley holds a B.A. in Economics from Claremont McKenna College and a B.S. and a M.S. in Industrial Engineering from Stanford University. to Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Inc. Mr. Flatley’s years of executive and management experience in the high technology industry, including serving as the chief executive officer of several public companies, his service on the boards of other publicly held companies, and his years of service as a director of Coherent make him an invaluable member of our Board of Directors. Susan M. James. Ms. James originally joined Ernst & Young, a global accounting services firm, in 1975, serving as a partner from 1987 until her retirement in June 2006, and as a 8 consultant from June 2006 to December 2009. During her tenure with Ernst & Young, she was the lead partner or partner-in-charge for the audit work for a significant number of technology companies, including Intel Corporation, Sun Microsystems, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Autodesk, Inc. and the Hewlett-Packard Company, as well as for the Ernst & Young North America Global Account Network. She also served on the Ernst & Young Americas Executive Board of Directors from January 2002 through June 2006. She is a certified public accountant (inactive) and a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Ms. James also serves on the boards of directors of Applied Materials, Inc., a global leader in materials engineering solutions for the semiconductor, flat panel display and solar photovoltaic industries and Tri-Valley Animal Rescue, a non-profit corporation dedicated to providing homes for homeless pets. Ms. James previously served as a director of Yahoo! Inc. Ms. James holds Bachelor’s degrees in Mathematics from Hunter College and Accounting from San Jose State University. Ms. James’ years in the public accounting industry, her service on the boards and committees of a number of other publicly held companies and her years of service as a director of Coherent make her an invaluable member of our Board of Directors. L. William (Bill) Krause. Since 1991, Mr. Krause has served as President of LWK Ventures, a private advisory and investment firm. In addition, Mr. Krause served as President and Chief Executive Officer of 3Com Corporation, a global data networking company, from 1981 to 1990 and as its Chairman from 1987 to 1993 when he retired. Mr. Krause currently serves on the boards of directors of the following public companies: Brocade Communications Systems, Inc., a networking solutions and services company and CommScope Holding Company, Inc., a networking infrastructure company. He also serves as Chairman of the Board of Veritas Holding, Ltd., an information management leader. Mr. Krause previously served as a director for the following public companies: Inc., Packeteer, Inc., Sybase, Inc. and TriZetto Group, Inc. Mr. Krause holds a B.S. degree in electrical engineering and received an honorary Doctorate of Science from The Citadel. Core-Mark Company, Holding Mr. Krause’s years of executive and management experience in the high technology industry, including serving as the chief executive officer of several companies, his service on the boards and committees of a number of other publicly held companies, and his years of service as a director of Coherent make him an invaluable member of our Board of Directors. Garry W. Rogerson. Mr. Rogerson has served as Coherent’s Chairman of the Board since June 2007. Since September 2015, Mr. Rogerson has been a private investor. From August 2011 to September 2015, Mr. Rogerson was Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Directors of Advanced Energy Industries, Inc., a provider of power and control technologies for thinfilm manufacturing and solar-power generation, after which he agreed to serve as a special advisor for a period of time. He was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Varian, Inc., a major supplier of scientific instruments and consumable laboratory supplies, vacuum products and services, from February 2009 and 2004, the purchase of Varian by Agilent respectively, until Technologies, Inc. in May 2010. Mr. Rogerson served as Varian’s Chief Operating Officer from 2002 to 2004, as Senior Vice President, Scientific Instruments from 2001 to 2002, and as Vice President, Analytical Instruments from 1999 to 2001. Mr. Rogerson received an honours degree and Ph.D. in biochemistry as well as an honorary doctoral science degree from the University of Kent at Canterbury. Mr. Rogerson’s years of executive and management experience in the high technology industry, including serving as the chief executive officer of several public companies, his service on the boards of other publicly held companies, and his years of service as a director of Coherent make him an invaluable member of our Board of Directors. Steve Skaggs. Mr. Skaggs has been a private investor since April 2016. From May 2013 to April 2016, Mr. Skaggs served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Atmel Corporation, a leading supplier of microcontrollers, prior to its acquisition by Microchip Technology Incorporated. Mr. Skaggs joined Atmel in September 2010 and served as Senior Vice President, Corporate Strategy and Development until his appointment as Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Skaggs has more than 25 years of experience in the semiconductor industry, including serving as President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Lattice Semiconductor, a supplier of programmable logic devices and related software. From 2008 to September 2010, Mr. Skaggs was employed as an independent management consultant, providing strategic advisory and consulting services to clients. From 2005 to 2008, Mr. Skaggs served as Chief Executive Officer of Lattice Semiconductor, a supplier of programmable logic devices and related software, and also served as President of Lattice from Proposal One Election of Directors 2003 to 2005 and as Chief Financial Officer of Lattice from 1996 to 2003. He was also previously a member of the Board of Directors of Lattice. Prior to Lattice, Mr. Skaggs was employed by Bain & Company, a global management consulting firm, where he specialized in high technology product strategy, mergers and acquisitions and corporate restructurings. Mr. Skaggs holds an MBA degree from the Harvard Business School and a B.S. degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of California, Berkeley. Mr. Skaggs’ years of executive and management experience in the high technology industry, including serving as the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of other public companies, his prior service on the board of another publicly held company and his years of service as a director of Coherent make him an invaluable member of our Board of Directors. Sandeep Vij. Since February 2013, Mr. Vij has been a private investor. Previously, he held the position of President and Chief Executive Officer of MIPS Technologies, Inc., a leading provider of processor architectures and cores, from January 2010 until its sale in February 2013. In addition, Mr. Vij had been the Vice President and General Manager of the Broadband and Consumer Division of Cavium Networks, Inc., a provider of highly integrated semiconductor products from May 2008 to January 2010. Prior to that, he held the position of Vice President of Worldwide Marketing, Services and Support for Xilinx Inc., a digital programmable logic device provider, from 2007 to April 2008. From 2001 to 2006, he held the position of Vice President of Worldwide Marketing at Xilinx. From 1997 to 2001, he served as Vice President and General Manager of the General Products Division at Xilinx. Mr. Vij joined Xilinx in 1996 as Director of FPGA Marketing. He is a graduate of General Electric’s Edison Engineering Program and Advanced Courses in Engineering. He holds an MSEE from Stanford University and a BSEE from San Jose State University. Mr. Vij’s years of executive and management experience in the high technology industry, including serving as the chief executive officer of another public company, his service on the board of another publicly held company, and his years of service as a director of Coherent make him an invaluable member of our Board of Directors. 9 Proposal One Election of Directors Director Independence The Board has determined that, with the exception of Mr. Ambroseo, all of its current members and all of the nominees for director are ‘‘independent directors’’ as that term is defined in the listing rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market. Board Meetings and Committees The Board held a total of five (5) formal meetings and acted twice by unanimous written consent during fiscal 2016. Additionally, from time to time between formal meetings, members of the Board participate in update or status telephone calls and briefings, which are not included in these totals. During fiscal 2016, the Board had three standing committees: the Audit Committee; the Compensation and H.R. Committee; and the Governance and Nominating Committee. From time to time, the Board may create, and has in the past created, limited ad hoc committees, service on which does not provide additional compensation. No director serving during fiscal 2016 attended fewer than 75% of the aggregate of all meetings of the Board and the committees of the Board upon which such director served. ‘‘independent’’ as defined under the listing rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market. The Compensation and H.R. Committee held four (4) meetings during fiscal 2016 and acted once by unanimous written consent. The Compensation and H.R. Committee, among other things, reviews and approves our executive compensation policies and programs, and makes equity grants to our employees, including officers, pursuant to our equity plan. This committee has the sole authority delegated to it by the Board to make employee equity grants, which are done at a meeting rather than by written consent. For additional information about the committee’s processes and procedures for the consideration and determination of executive compensation, see ‘‘Compensation Discussion and Analysis.’’ Audit Committee The Audit Committee consists of directors James (Chair), Rogerson, and Skaggs. The Audit Committee held twelve (12) meetings during fiscal 2016. The Board has determined that directors James, Rogerson and Skaggs are ‘‘audit committee financial experts’’ as that term is defined in the rules of the SEC. Among other things, the Audit Committee has the sole authority for appointing and supervising our independent registered public accounting firm and is primarily responsible for approving the services performed by our independent registered public accounting for reviewing and evaluating our accounting principles and our system of internal accounting controls. firm and Governance and Nominating Committee The Governance and Nominating Committee consists of directors Rogerson (Chair), James and Krause. The Governance and Nominating Committee held three (3) meetings during fiscal 2016. The Governance and Nominating Committee, among other things, assists the Board by making recommendations to the Board on matters concerning director nominations and elections, board committees and corporate governance, allocation of risk oversight amongst the Board and its committees and compensation for directors. For fiscal 2016, the committee retained an independent compensation consultant to advise it on compensation for service on the Board. Compensation and H.R. Committee The Compensation and H.R. Committee of the Board consists of directors Vij (Chair), Flatley and Krause. As noted above, all of the members of the Compensation and H.R. Committee are Copies of the charters for each of our committees may be found on our website at www.coherent.com under ‘‘Investor Relations.’’ Attendance at Annual Meeting of Stockholders by the Members of the Board of Directors All directors are encouraged, but not required, to attend our annual meeting of stockholders. At our annual meeting held on February 26, 2016, all members of the Board attended in person. 10 Process for Stockholders to Recommend Candidates for Election to the Board of Directors The Governance and Nominating Committee will consider nominees properly recommended by stockholders. A stockholder that desires to recommend a candidate for election to the Board must direct the recommendation in writing to us at our principal executive offices (Attention: Corporate Secretary) and must include the candidate’s name, age, home and business contact information, principal occupation or employment, the number of shares beneficially owned by the nominee and the stockholder making the recommendation, whether any hedging transactions have been entered into by the nominee or on his or her behalf, information regarding any arrangements or understandings between the nominee and the stockholder nominating the nominee or any other persons relating to the nomination, a written statement by the nominee acknowledging that the nominee will owe a fiduciary duty to Coherent if elected, a written statement of the nominee that such nominee, if elected, intends to tender, promptly following such nominee’s election or re-election, an irrevocable resignation effective upon such nominee’s failure to receive the required vote for re-election at the next meeting at which such nominee would face re-election and upon acceptance of such resignation by the Board in accordance with Coherent’s guidelines or policies, and any other information required to be disclosed about the nominee if proxies were to be solicited to elect the nominee as a director. For a stockholder recommendation to be considered by the Governance and Nominating Committee as a potential candidate at a meeting of stockholders, nominations must be received on or before the deadline for receipt of stockholder proposals for such meeting. In the event a stockholder decides to nominate a candidate for director and solicits proxies for such candidate, the stockholder will need to follow the rules set forth by the SEC and in our bylaws. See ‘‘General Information About the Meeting-Deadline for Receipt of Stockholder Proposals.’’ The Governance and Nominating Committee’s criteria and process for evaluating and identifying the candidates that it approves as director nominees are as follows: • the Governance and Nominating Committee regularly reviews the current composition and size of the Board; • the Governance and Nominating Committee reviews the qualifications of any candidates who have been properly those recommended by a stockholder, as well as 11 Proposal One Election of Directors in candidates who have been identified by management, individual members of the Board or, if the Governance and Nominating Committee determines, a search firm. Such review may, the Governance and Nominating review solely of Committee’s discretion, information provided to the Governance and Nominating Committee or may also include discussions with persons familiar with the candidate, an interview with the candidate or other actions that the committee deems proper; include a • the Governance and Nominating Committee evaluates the performance of the Board as a whole and evaluates the qualifications of individual members of the Board eligible for re-election at the annual meeting of stockholders; • the Governance and Nominating Committee considers the suitability of each candidate, including the current members of the Board, in light of the current size and composition of the Board. Except as may be required by rules promulgated by the Nasdaq Stock Market or the SEC, it is the current belief of the Governance and Nominating Committee that there are no specific, minimum qualifications that must be met by any candidate for the Board, nor are there specific qualities or skills that are necessary for one or more of the members of the Board to possess. In evaluating the qualifications of the candidates, the Governance and Nominating Committee considers many factors, including, issues of character, independence, age, judgment, expertise, diversity of experience, length of service, other commitments and the like. While Coherent does not have a formal policy with regard to the consideration of diversity in identifying director nominees, as noted above, diversity of experience is one of many factors that the committee considers; these • the Governance and Nominating Committee evaluates such factors, among others, and does not assign any particular weighting or priority factors. The to any of Governance and Nominating Committee considers each individual candidate in the context of the current perceived needs of the Board as a whole. While the Governance and Nominating Committee has not established specific minimum qualifications the committee believes that candidates and nominees must reflect a Board that is comprised of directors who (i) are predominantly independent, (ii) are of high integrity, (iii) have qualifications that will increase the overall effectiveness of the Board, and (iv) meet other requirements for director candidates, Proposal One Election of Directors as may be required by applicable rules, such as financial literacy or to audit committee members; financial expertise with respect • in evaluating and identifying candidates, the Governance and Nominating Committee has the authority to retain and terminate any third party search firm that is used to identify director candidates and has the authority to approve the fees and retention terms of any search firm; and • after such review and consideration, the Governance and Nominating Committee recommends the slate of director nominees to the full Board for its approval. The Governance and Nominating Committee will endeavor to notify, or cause to be notified, all director candidates, including those recommended by a stockholder, of its decision as to whether to nominate such individual for election to the Board. Our corporate governance guidelines require that upon a member of the Board turning 72 years old, he or she shall submit a conditional resignation to the Governance and Nominating Committee effective upon the next annual meeting of stockholders. The committee then determines whether to recommend that the Board accept of such resignation. Mr. Krause has so notified the committee, which determined that it was not in the best interest of the Company’s stockholders to accept such resignation and has included Mr. Krause in the slate for this year’s election of directors. Majority Voting and Conditional Resignations from the Board of Directors the recommendation of Upon the Governance and Nominating Committee the Board of Directors amended our bylaws, effective December 1, 2013, to change the voting standard for the election of directors that are not Contested Elections (as defined below) from a plurality to a majority of the votes cast. A majority of the votes cast means the number of votes cast ‘‘for’’ a director’s election exceeds the number of votes cast against that director’s election (with ‘‘abstentions’’ and ‘‘broker non-votes’’ not counted as a vote cast either ‘‘for’’ or ‘‘against’’ that director’s election). However, if the number of nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected (a ‘‘Contested Election’’), the directors shall be elected by a plurality of the votes cast. Stockholder Communication with the Board of Directors While the Board believes that management speaks for Coherent, the Board encourages direct communication from stockholders. Accordingly, any stockholder may contact any member of our Board of Directors individually or as a group by writing by mail to our principal executive offices (c/o Corporate Secretary) at 5100 Patrick Henry Dr., Santa Clara, CA 95054. In connection with the amendment to the Bylaws establishing a majority vote standard for the election of directors in elections that are not Contested Elections, the Board also adopted a director election policy to (i) establish procedures under which any incumbent director who fails to receive a majority of the votes cast in an election that is not a Contested Election shall tender his or her resignation to the Governance and Nominating Committee for consideration; and (ii) provide that the Governance and Nominating Committee will make recommendations to the Board regarding the actions to be taken with respect to all such offers to resign. The Board shall act on the resignation within 90 days following certification of the election results. In the event that the Board does not accept such resignation, then such director shall continue to serve until such time as his or her successor is elected. Any stockholder may report to us any complaints or comments regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters. Any stockholder who wishes to so contact us should send such complaints or comments to the Audit Committee c/o Corporate Secretary, at our principal executive offices. Any stockholder communications that the Board receives will first go to our Corporate Secretary, who will log the date of 12 Proposal One Election of Directors receipt of the communication as well as the identity and contact information of the correspondent in our stockholder communications log. Our Corporate Secretary will review, summarize and, if appropriate, investigate the complaint under the direction of the appropriate committee of the Board in a timely manner. In the case of accounting or auditing related matters, a member of the Audit Committee, or the Audit Committee as a whole, will then review the summary of the communication, the results of the investigation, if any, and, if appropriate, the draft response. The summary and response will be in the form of a the stockholder memo, which will become part of communications log that the Corporate Secretary maintains with respect to all stockholder communications. Independent Chair and Board Leadership Our Board leadership structure consists of an independent Chairman, who is elected by the independent directors, and independent committee chairs. We separate the positions of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman in recognition of the differences between the two roles. The Board believes this structure provides independent Board leadership and engagement. Given that our Chairman is an independent director, the Board does not feel the need for a separate ‘‘lead independent director,’’ as our independent Chairman performs that function. The Board takes its independence seriously and reinforces this standard with six of its seven members, 87%, being independent. The Role of the Board and its Committees in Risk Oversight The Board oversees Coherent’s risk profile and management’s processes for assessing and managing risk, both as a Board and through its committees, with our Governance and Nominating Committee delegated the responsibility for assigning oversight responsibilities to each committee and the Board as a whole. Our senior executive team provides regular updates to the Board and each committee regarding our strategies and objectives and the risks inherent with them. those related Each regular meeting of the Board includes a discussion of risks related to the Company’s financial results and operations and each committee schedules risk-related presentations regularly throughout the year. In addition our directors have access to our management to discuss any matters of interest, including risk. Those members of to management most knowledgeable of the issues attend Board and committee meetings to provide additional insight on the matters being discussed, including risk exposures. Our Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel both report directly to our Chief Executive Officer, providing him with further visibility to our risk profile. A Vice President, Finance is the designated officer overseeing our enterprise risk management program and works closely with both our Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel on these matters. These regular meetings also provide our Board members the opportunity to discuss issues of concern directly with management. In general the Board and its committees oversee the following risk categories: • the Board generally oversees the Company’s overall enterprise risk management process and specifically with regards to the areas of strategy, mergers and acquisitions, communications and operations; • the Audit Committee generally oversees risks primarily related to financial controls, IT, accounting, tax, treasury, capital, legal, regulatory and compliance; • the Compensation and H.R. Committee generally oversees our compensation programs so that they do not incentivize excessive risk taking as well as overseeing human resources related risks; and • the Governance and Nominating Committee oversees the assignment of risk oversight categories by each particular committee and/or the Board as a whole as well as those risks related to compensation of members of the Board, succession planning for the Board and Chief Executive Officer. Annually, management presents an assessment of the risks associated with the Company’s compensation plans. The 13 Proposal One Election of Directors the Compensation and H.R. Committee agreed with conclusion from the winter of calendar 2016 presentation that the risks were within our ability to effectively monitor and manage and that these risks are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. Additional Governance Matters The Board of Directors (acting on the recommendation of the Governance and Nominating Committee) has approved the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, which include, among other items (in addition to those items described elsewhere in this proxy): • At each regular meeting of the Board the independent directors also meet in executive session without the presence of management; • To avoid ‘‘over-boarding’’ we maintain the following limits on service on other boards: • CEO—No more than one (1) other public company board of directors in addition to the Company (note, however, that Mr. Ambroseo does not serve on any public company boards other than ours); • Independent Directors—No more than four (4) other public company board of directors in addition to the Company; • Audit Committee members—No more than three (3) other public company audit committees in addition to the Company; • Each independent member of the Board must within five years of initial appointment acquire and thereafter maintain a minimum value of Company stock equal to three times such director’s annual Board cash retainer (exclusive of any cash retainer for service as Chair or committee service); • The Board is responsible for reviewing the Company’s succession planning and senior management development on an annual basis; • The Board maintains an age-based term limit of 72 (provided, that the Governance and Nominating Committee maintains the flexibility to not apply such limit on a facts and circumstances basis). Fiscal 2016 Director Compensation During fiscal 2016, we paid our non-employee directors an annual retainer (depending upon position) and for service on the Board as follows: Position Board Member Board Chair Audit Committee Chair Compensation and H.R. Committee Chair Governance & Nominating Committee Chair Audit Committee member (non-Chair) Compensation and H.R. Committee member (non-Chair) Governance and Nominating Committee member (non-Chair) Annual Retainer $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 34,000 $ 16,000 $ 10,750 $ 12,500 8,500 $ 6,500 $ The Governance and Nominating Committee annually reviews Board and committee compensation with the assistance of an independent compensation consultant, which for fiscal 2016 was Compensia. Compensia is separately compensated for this work from the work it does as the Compensation and H.R. Committee’s independent consultant for executive compensation. As noted elsewhere in this proxy statement, Compensia has not provided any other service for the Company other than as directed by a committee of the Board. 14 The chart below summarizes the gross cash amounts earned by non-employee directors for service during fiscal 2016 on the Board and its committees: Proposal One Election of Directors Name Jay T. Flatley Susan M. James L. William Krause Garry W. Rogerson Steve Skaggs Sandeep Vij Annual Board Audit Service Committee Compensation and H.R. Committee Nominating and Governance Committee Total $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 80,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 — $ 34,000 — $ 12,500 $ 12,500 — $ $ 8,500 — 8,500 — — $ 16,000 6,500 $ $ 6,500 $ 10,750 48,500 — $ 80,500 $ $ 55,000 $ 103,250 52,500 56,000 — $ — $ The chart below presents information concerning the total compensation of our non-employee directors for services (including both Board and, where applicable, committee service) provided during the fiscal year ended October 1, 2016: Name Jay T. Flatley Susan M. James L. William Krause Garry W. Rogerson Steve Skaggs Sandeep Vij Fees Paid in Cash ($) Stock Awards Option Awards ($)(3) ($)(1)(2) Total ($) 48,500 80,500 55,000 103,250 52,500 56,000 294,000 294,000 294,000 294,000 294,000 294,000 — 342,500 — 374,500 — 349,000 — 397,250 — 346,500 — 350,000 (1) These amounts do not reflect compensation actually received. Rather, these amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with ASC 718, for restricted stock units (‘‘RSUs’’) which were granted in fiscal 2016. The assumptions used to calculate the value of these stock units are set forth in Note 12. ‘‘Employee Stock Award and Benefit Plans’’ of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2016. (2) The directors’ aggregate outstanding RSU grants as of the end of fiscal 2016 were as follows: Name Jay T. Flatley Susan M. James L. William Krause Garry W. Rogerson Steve Skaggs Sandeep Vij Shares(a) 3,500(b) 3,500(b) 3,500(b) 3,500(b) 3,500(b) 3,500(b) (a) The shares underlying the RSUs will vest to the extent an individual is a member of the Board of Directors on the applicable vesting date. (b) 3,500 shares vest on February 15, 2017. 15 Proposal One Election of Directors (3) No stock option awards were granted to members of the Board during fiscal 2016. The directors’ aggregate holdings of stock option awards (both vested and unvested) as of October 1, 2016 were as follows: Name Jay T. Flatley Susan M. James L. William Krause Garry W. Rogerson Steve Skaggs Sandeep Vij The following table shows equity grants received by non-employee directors in fiscal 2016: Shares 24,000 — 6,000 — — — Restricted Stock Units Granted in Fiscal 2016 (# shares) 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 under the 1998 Director Plan, such grants will fully vest and the director will have the right to exercise his or her option as to both vested and unvested shares as of such date. The option will remain exercisable for the lesser of (i) two (2) years following the date of such director’s retirement or (ii) the expiration of the option’s original term. No unvested options remain outstanding. This provision was not adopted for option grants under the 2011 Plan. With the adoption of our 2011 Plan, the 1998 Director Plan has been terminated other than for outstanding historical grants made thereunder. As of October 1, 2016, 784,000 shares have been issued upon the exercise of options and the vesting of RSUs under the 1998 Director Plan. Name Jay T. Flatley Susan M. James L. William Krause Garry W. Rogerson Steven Skaggs Sandeep Vij Our stockholders approved the adoption of our 2011 Equity Incentive Plan at our annual meeting held in March 2011 (the ‘‘2011 Plan’’). the (based upon Following the recommendation of the Governance and Nominating Committee review by Compensia), the Board has adopted resolutions automatically granting under the 2011 Plan each non-employee member of the Board of Directors 3,500 RSUs upon such member’s reelection to the Board, with vesting on February 15 of the following year. Effective in December 2011, the Board initial appointment of a determined non-employee member to the Board, such new director will receive a grant of 3,500 RSUs, which vest over two years (fifty percent on each anniversary of grant). that upon the For option grants held by a director who retires after at least eight years of service on the Board which are outstanding 16 Proposal One Election of Directors Option Exercises and Stock Vested at 2016 Fiscal Year-End The table below sets forth certain information for each non-employee director regarding the exercise of options and the vesting of stock awards during the year ended October 1, 2016, including the aggregate value realized upon such exercise or vesting. Name Jay T. Flatley Susan M. James L. William Krause Garry W. Rogerson Steve Skaggs Sandeep Vij Option Awards Stock Awards Number of Shares Number of Shares Acquired on Value Realized on Exercise ($)(1) Exercise (#) Acquired on Value Realized on Vesting ($)(2) Vesting (#) — — 24,000 — — — — — 2,061,614 — — — 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 5,250 3,500 268,800 268,800 268,800 268,800 382,550 268,800 (1) Reflects the difference between the exercise price of the option and market price of our common stock on the exercise date. (2) Reflects the market price of our common stock on the vesting date or the last day on which our common stock traded prior to the vesting date if trading did not occur on the vesting date. Vote Required Every stockholder voting for the election of directors may cumulate such stockholder’s votes and give one candidate a number of votes equal to the number of directors to be elected multiplied by the number of votes to which the stockholder’s shares are entitled. Alternatively, a stockholder may distribute his or her votes on the same principle among as many candidates as the stockholder thinks fit, provided that votes cannot be cast for more than seven (7) candidates. However, no stockholder will be entitled to cumulate votes for a candidate unless (i) such candidate’s name has been properly placed in nomination for election at the Annual Meeting prior to the voting and (ii) the stockholder, or any other stockholder, has given notice at the meeting prior to the voting of the intention to cumulate the stockholder’s votes. If cumulative voting occurs at the meeting and you do not specify how to distribute your votes, your proxy holders (the individuals named on your proxy card) will cumulate votes in such a manner as will ensure the election of as many of the nominees listed above as possible, and the specific nominees to be voted for will be determined by the proxy holders. If a quorum is present, each of the seven (7) nominees who receives more ‘‘FOR’’ votes than ‘‘AGAINST’’ votes will be elected. Recommendation The Board recommends that Stockholders vote ‘‘FOR’’ the seven nominees presented herein. 17 PROPOSAL TWO RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM The Audit Committee of the Board has selected Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, to audit our financial statements for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2017, and recommends that stockholders vote for ratification of such appointment. Deloitte & Touche LLP has audited our financial statements since the fiscal year ended September 25, 1976. Although ratification by stockholders is not required by law, the Audit Committee has determined that it is desirable to request ratification of this selection by the stockholders as a matter of good corporate practice. Notwithstanding its selection, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may appoint a new independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if the Audit Committee believes that such a change would be in the best interest of Coherent and its stockholders. If the stockholders do not ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP, the Audit Committee may reconsider its selection. The Audit Committee selected Deloitte & Touche LLP to audit our financial statements for the fiscal year ended October 1, 2016, which was ratified by our stockholders. Representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP are expected to be present at the meeting and will be afforded the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so. The representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP are also expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions. Principal Accounting Fees and Services The following table sets forth fees for services provided by Deloitte & Touche LLP, the member firms of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, and their respective affiliates (collectively, ‘‘Deloitte’’) during fiscal 2016 and 2015: Audit fees(1) Tax fees(2) All other fees(3) Total $ 2016 2,123,621 218,115 2,600 $ 2015 2,030,577 176,323 2,600 $ 2,344,336 $ 2,209,500 (1) Represents fees for professional services provided in connection with the integrated audit of our annual financial statements and internal control over financial reporting and review of our quarterly financial statements, advice on accounting matters that arose during the audit and audit services provided in connection with other statutory or regulatory filings. (2) Represents tax compliance and related services. (3) Represents the annual subscription for access to the Deloitte Accounting Research Tool, which is a searchable on-line accounting database. 18 Proposal Two Ratification of the Appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm the Committee from to pre-approve certain additional services, and such pre-approvals are communicated to the full Committee at its next meeting. During fiscal years 2016 and 2015, 100% of the services were pre-approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with this policy. Recommendation The Audit Committee and the Board recommends that the Stockholders vote appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2017. the ratification of ‘‘FOR’’ Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services The Audit Committee has determined that the provision of non-audit services by Deloitte is compatible with maintaining Deloitte’s independence. In accordance with its charter, the Audit Committee approves in advance all audit and non-audit services to be provided by Deloitte. In other cases, the Chairman of the Audit Committee has the delegated authority Vote Required The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast will be required to ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2017. 19 PROPOSAL THREE APPROVAL ON A NON-BINDING, ADVISORY BASIS, OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION At our Annual Meeting in March 2011, our stockholders indicated that they would like to have an annual advisory vote on executive compensation. Accordingly, our Board of Directors proposes that stockholders provide advisory (non-binding) approval of the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, including the Compensation the Fiscal 2016 Summary Discussion and Analysis, Compensation Table and related tables and disclosure. As described in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis, we have adopted an executive compensation philosophy designed to provide alignment between executive pay and performance and to focus executives on making decisions that enhance our stockholder value in both the short and long term. Executives are compensated in a manner consistent with Coherent’s strategy, competitive practices, stockholder interest alignment, and evolving compensation governance standards. Recommendation The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that Stockholders vote ‘‘FOR’’ the approval, on a non-binding, advisory basis of our named executive officer compensation disclosed in this proxy statement. Vote Required Under our bylaws the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes cast is required to approve the compensation of our named executive officers disclosed in this proxy statement. The vote is an advisory vote, and therefore not binding. Our Board of Directors values the opinions of our stockholders and to the extent there is any the named executive officer significant vote against compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement, we will consider our stockholders’ concerns and the Compensation and H.R. Committee will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns. 20 PROPOSAL FOUR APPROVAL ON A NON-BINDING, ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE FREQUENCY WITH WHICH STOCKHOLDERS WILL VOTE ON OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION At our Annual Meeting in March 2011, our stockholders indicated that they would like to have an annual advisory vote the on executive compensation. We are required by Dodd-Frank Act to seek a separate advisory vote at least every six years regarding the frequency of the ‘‘say-on-pay’’ vote. Stockholders may indicate whether they would prefer an advisory vote on named executive officer compensation once every one, two or three years. Stockholders may abstain by submitting a proxy card without instruction on Proposal Four or by checking the box labeled ‘‘Abstain.’’ Recommendation The Board of Directors does not make a recommendation on the frequency with which stockholders will vote on our named executive officer compensation. Vote Required The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes cast is required to approve the frequency with which stockholders will cast advisory votes at our annual meetings to approve named executive officer compensation. If none of the alternatives of every one year, two years or three years receives a majority vote, we will consider the highest number of votes cast by stockholders to be the frequency that has been selected by stockholders. However, because this vote is advisory and not binding on the Board of Directors in any way, the Board of Directors may decide that it is in the best interests of our stockholders to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation more or less frequently than the option approved by our stockholders. 21 SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2016, certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of common stock by (i) any person (including any ‘‘group’’ as that term is used in Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act) known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our voting securities, (ii) each director and each nominee for director, (iii) each of the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table appearing herein, and (iv) all executive officers and directors as a group, based on information available to the Company as of filing this proxy statement. We do not know of any arrangements, including any pledge by any person of our securities, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change of control. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each stockholder in the table below is c/o Coherent, Inc., 5100 Patrick Henry Drive, Santa Clara, California 95054. Name and Address BlackRock Fund Advisors(2) 400 Howard St. San Francisco, CA 94105 Vanguard Group Inc.(2) P.O. Box 2600 Valley Forge, PA 19482 Eagle Asset Management, Inc.(2) 880 Carillon Parkway St. Petersburg, FL 33716 Dimensional Fund Advisors LP(2) 6300 Bee Cave Rd. Austin, TX 78746 John R. Ambroseo(3) Kevin Palatnik(4) Helene Simonet Mark Sobey Paul Sechrist Bret DiMarco Jay T. Flatley(5) Susan M. James(6) L. William Krause(7) Garry W. Rogerson(8) Steve Skaggs(6) Sandeep Vij(9) All directors and executive officers as a group (13 persons)(10) * Represents less than 1%. Number Percent of Total(1) of Shares 2,303,487 9.38% 2,007,082 8.17% 1,613,182 6.57% 1,435,440 5.85% 181,542 5,517 16,305 13,097 10,772 12,126 43,500 7,500 9,500 20,000 13,000 21,900 344,689 * * * * * * * * * * * * 1.40% (1) Based upon 24,553,444 shares of Coherent common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2016. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to the securities. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, each share of Coherent common stock subject to options held by that person that are currently exercisable or will be exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 2016 and all RSUs which will vest within 60 days of December 31, 2016, are deemed outstanding. In addition, such shares, are not deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. 22 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management (2) Based on the institutional holding report provided by NASDAQ. (3) Includes 181,542 shares owned by the Ambroseo-Lacorte Family Trust of which Mr. Ambroseo is a trustee. (4) Includes 5,250 shares issuable upon vesting of RSUs within 60 days of December 31, 2016. (5) Includes 24,000 shares issuable upon exercise of vested options held by Mr. Flatley, 3,500 shares issuable upon vesting of RSUs within 60 days of December 31, 2016 and 16,000 shares held by the Flatley Family Trust. (6) Includes 3,500 shares issuable upon vesting of RSUs within 60 days of December 31, 2016. (7) (8) (9) Includes 6,000 shares issuable upon exercise of vested options held by Mr. Krause and 3,500 shares issuable upon vesting of RSUs within 60 days of December 31, 2016. Includes 3,500 shares issuable upon vesting of RSUs within 60 days of December 31, 2016 and 16,500 shares held by the 2000 Rogerson Family Revocable Living Trust. Includes 3,500 shares issuable upon vesting of RSUs within 60 days of December 31, 2016 and 18,400 shares held by the Vij Family 2001 Trust. (10) Includes an aggregate of 30,000 vested options and 26,250 shares issuable upon vesting of RSUs which will vest within 60 days of December 31, 2016. Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Exchange Act’’) requires our officers and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Such officers, directors and ten-percent stockholders are also required by SEC rules to furnish us with copies of all forms that they file pursuant to Section 16(a). Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms received by us, and on written representations from certain reporting persons that no other reports were required for such persons, we believe that, during fiscal 2016, our officers, directors and, to our knowledge, greater than ten percent complied with all applicable stockholders Section 16(a) filing requirements. 23 OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS The name, age, position and a brief account of the business experience of our Chief Executive Officer and each of our other executive officers as of December 31, 2016 are set forth below: Name Age John R. Ambroseo(1) Kevin Palatnik(1) Mark Sobey(1) Paul Sechrist(1) Luis Spinelli Bret DiMarco(1) Thomas Merk 55 59 56 57 69 48 54 Office Held President and Chief Executive Officer Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Executive Vice President and General Manager, OEM Laser Sources Executive Vice President, Worldwide Sales and Service Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary Executive Vice President and General Manager, Industrial Laser and Systems (1) Designated as a ‘‘Named Executive Officer’’ for purposes of our Compensation Discussion and Analysis Please see heading ‘‘Nominees’’ under Proposal One above for Mr. Ambroseo’s biographical information. Mr. Palatnik has served as our Executive Kevin Palatnik. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since February 2016. Prior to that from August 2011 until its acquisition by Knowles Corporation in July 2015, Mr. Palatnik served as the Chief Financial Officer of Audience, Inc., a provider of intelligent voice and audio solutions for mobile devices. Prior to that from June 2001 to November 2010, Mr. Palatnik held various roles at Cadence Design Systems, Inc., an electronic design automation software company, including as its senior vice president and chief financial officer. Mr. Palatnik also serves as a member of the board of directors and chair of the audit committee of Adesto Technologies, Inc., a memory solutions semiconductor company. Mr. Palatnik received a B.S. in Industrial Engineering and Operations Research and a M.B.A. from Syracuse University. Mr. Sobey has served as our Executive Vice Mark Sobey. President and General Manager of OEM Laser Sources (OLS) since November 2016. He previously served as our Executive Vice President and General Manager of Specialty Laser Systems (SLS) from April 2010 to November 2016. Mr. Sobey served as Senior Vice President and General Manager for the SLS Business Group from joining Coherent in July 2007 until April 2010. Prior to Coherent, Mr. Sobey spent over 20 years in the Laser and Fiber Optics Telecommunications industries, including roles as Senior Vice President Product Management at Cymer from January 2006 through June 2007 and previously as Senior Vice President Global Sales at JDS Uniphase through October 2005. He received his PhD in Engineering and BSc in Physics, both from the University of Strathclyde in Scotland. Paul Sechrist. Mr. Paul Sechrist was appointed Executive Vice President, Worldwide Sales and Service in March 2011. He has over 35 years of experience with Coherent, including roles as Senior Vice President and General Manager of Commercial Lasers and Components from October 2008 to March 2011, Vice President and General Manager of Specialty Laser Systems, Santa Clara from March 2008 to October 2008 and Vice President for Components from April 2005 to October 2008. Mr. Sechrist received an AA degree from San Jose City College, with Physics studies at California State University, Hayward. Mr. Spinelli has served as our Executive Vice Luis Spinelli. President and Chief Technology Officer since February 2004. Mr. Spinelli joined the Company in May 1985 and has since held various engineering and managerial positions, including Vice President, Advanced Research from April 2000 to September 2002 and Vice President, Corporate Research from September 2002 to February 2004. Mr. Spinelli has led the Advanced Research Unit from its inception in 1998, whose charter is to identify and evaluate new and emerging technologies of interest for us across a range of disciplines in the laser field. Mr. Spinelli holds a degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Buenos Aires, Argentina with post-graduate work at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Mr. DiMarco has served as our Executive Bret DiMarco. Vice President and General Counsel since June 2006 and our Corporate Secretary since February 2007. From February 2003 until May 2006, Mr. DiMarco was a member and from October 1995 until January 2003 was an associate at Wilson 24 Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., a law firm. Mr. DiMarco received a Bachelor’s degree from the University of California at Irvine and a Juris Doctorate degree from the Law Center at the University of Southern California. Mr. DiMarco is also a member of the Nasdaq Listing and Hearing Review Council. Thomas Merk. Mr Merk was appointed Executive Vice President and General Manager, Industrial Laser and Systems in December 2016. Prior to that Mr. Merk was Chief Executive Officer of Rofin-Sinar Technologies Inc. and a member of its Board of directors from July 2015 to November 2016, when the acquisition of Rofin by and President Our Executive Officers the Company was completed. From December 2005 to July 2015 Mr. Merk was the Chief Operating Officer of the Rofin Micro and Marking Business and a Managing Director of Carl Baasel Lasertechnik GmbH & Co. KG. from May 2000 to November 2016. He started his career in 1989 at Boehringer Werkzeugmaschinen Vertriebs GmbH, a machine tool company, and remained there until 2000, most recently serving as managing director. Mr. Merk holds a Master’s Degree in mechanical engineering from the Technical University of Stuttgart, Germany. 25 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS Introduction In this section, we describe the material components of our executive compensation program for our ‘‘Named Executive Officers’’ or ‘‘NEOs’’: Ms. Simonet and Messrs. Ambroseo, Palatnik, Sobey, Sechrist and DiMarco. Mr. Palatnik was hired in February 2016 and Ms. Simonet retired in 2016. We also provide an overview of our executive compensation philosophy, principal compensation policies and practices by which the Compensation and H.R. Committee, or the committee, arrives at its decisions regarding NEO compensation. NEO Compensation Overview The following chart sets forth our compensation philosophy and design principles: Compensation Philosophy Compensation Design Principles Retain and hire talented executives Pay for performance, with both short and long-term measurements Our executives should have market competitive compensation and the committee orients our target total compensation generally near the 50th percentile of the committee’s selected peer group, with actual compensation falling above or below depending upon our financial performance and the performance of our stock price against the Russell 2000 Index over a three-year vesting period. Compensation components may be above or below such percentile target and varies by individual executive. A significant portion of the annual compensation of our executives is designed to vary with annual business performance and the long-term relative performance of our stock price in comparison to the Russell 2000 Index (by way of a single three year vesting period). Align compensation with stockholder interests Tie compensation to performance Our fiscal 2016 annual cash incentive plan was dependent upon corporate achievement of two demanding performance targets: revenue and adjusted of the core business EBITDA dollars. The committee determined that these were the most effective metrics for tying management’s compensation directly to our core operating results for fiscal 2016. Our stockholders benefit from continued strong operating performance by the Company and we believe that having a significant portion of compensation tied to equity with both time and performance-based vesting requirements directly aligns management to stockholder returns. Performance-based RSUs make up the largest potential portion of the equity grants for our CEO, and make up a significant potential portion of the equity grants of our other NEOs. Grants of performance-based RSUs in fiscal 2016 have the same measurement as in fiscal 2015: a single vesting date three years from grant solely dependent upon the performance of our common stock price measured against the Russell 2000 Index, with target at meeting the index’s performance. 26 Compensation Discussion and Analysis The following chart sets forth our principal elements of NEO compensation: Executive Compensation Program Overview—Elements of Compensation Element Variability Objective How Established Fiscal Year 2016 for NEOs Base salary remained unchanged as compared to fiscal 2015. Semi-Annual bonus funding from revenue and adjusted EBITDA achievement. Revenue achievement weighted at 25% and adjusted EBITDA achievement weighted at 75%. Total payout can range from 0% to 200% of target. For the first half of fiscal 2016, revenue achievement was 16.7% of target and adjusted EBITDA achievement was 130.2% of target. For the second half of fiscal 2016, revenue achievement was 219.9% of target and adjusted EBITDA achievement was 283.6% of target. Combined bonus payout equaled 151% of target. Fiscal year 2016 service-based awards vest 1/3 per year over three years, with the first vesting date occurring on the one year anniversary of the grant date. Base Salary Fixed Annual Cash Incentive Performance Based Provide a competitive fixed component of compensation that, as part of a total cash compensation package, enables us to attract and retain top talent. Offer a variable cash compensation opportunity twice per fiscal year based upon the level of achievement of corporate goals. Reviewed against executive officer’s skill, experience and responsibilities, and for competitiveness against our compensation peer group. Target payouts set by measuring total cash compensation opportunity against the peer group. Corporate performance targets based on challenging operational goals. RSUs—Service Based Value tied to Stock Price Target total value of annual awards using market data (reviewed against our compensation peer group for competitiveness) and the executive officer’s responsibilities, contributions and criticality to ongoing success. Align long-term management and stockholder interests and strengthen retention with three-year vesting. Performance-based awards provide opportunity based upon the performance of our stock price against the Russell 2000 Index. Service-based awards offer some certainty and create long-term retention. 27 Compensation Discussion and Analysis Element RSUs— Performance Based Variability Performance Based—Value tied to Stock Price Objective How Established Other Benefits Primarily Fixed Reviewed for competitiveness against our compensation peer group. Provide competitive employee benefits. We do not view this as a significant component of our executive compensation program. Fiscal Year 2016 for NEOs Performance award size measured by comparing our stock price performance against that of the Russell 2000 Index. Awards can range from 0% to 200% of target. For every 1% our stock price is below the Russell 2000 Index, the target award is reduced by 4%; for every 1% our stock price is above the Russell 2000 Index, the target award is increased by 2%. Due to the performance of our stock price, awards that vested in fiscal 2016 were 60% of the target award. No significant changes to fiscal year 2016 program. feedback Stockholder Feedback The committee carefully considers from our stockholders regarding our executive compensation program, including the results of our annual advisory vote on executive compensation, which our stockholders have historically strongly supported. All stockholders are invited to express their views to the committee as described in this proxy under the heading ‘‘Stockholder Communication with the Board of Directors.’’ The committee welcomes direct stockholder feedback and considers such feedback as well as the results of our historical ‘‘say on pay’’ results in its deliberations on executive compensation. We strongly urge our stockholders to read this Compensation Discussion and Analysis in conjunction with Proposal Three. Executive Summary Our Business Founded in 1966, Coherent, Inc. is one of the leading providers of lasers and laser-based technology for scientific, commercial and industrial customers. Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market and is part of the Russell 2000 and Standard & Poor’s SmallCap 600 Index. For more information about our business, please read ‘‘Business’’ and ‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations’’ sections in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with SEC on November 29, 2016. Selected Business Highlights We experienced a significant growth in revenue in fiscal 2016, which exceeded our own internal growth targets. In addition, we were able to significantly grow our adjusted EBITDA% and non-GAAP earnings per share. Accordingly, the Company significantly exceeded the performance-related goals for our 28 Compensation Discussion and Analysis Our non-GAAP earnings per share increased 22% from fiscal 2014 to fiscal 2015 and increased 22% from fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2016: $4.75 $3.89 $3.19 $5.0 $4.5 $4.0 $3.5 $3.0 $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 $1.0 $0.5 $0.0 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 * Non-GAAP earnings per share is defined as earnings per share 7JAN201707083759 excluding certain recurring and non-recurring items. For a reconciliation table of earnings per share on a GAAP basis to non-GAAP basis and net income on a GAAP basis to adjusted EBITDA $, please refer to the ‘‘Reconciliation Table’’ at the end of this section. tie executive Compensation Overview Compensation Philosophy. We total compensation to stockholder value with two measures: our operational results and the comparative performance of our stock price. This approach provides strong alignment between executive pay and performance and focuses executives on making decisions that enhance our stockholder value in both the short and long-term. We design our executive compensation program to achieve the following goals: • Pay for performance, with both short and long-term measurements—A significant portion of the annual compensation of our executives is designed to vary with annual business performance and the long-term relative performance of Coherent’s stock price in comparison to the Russell 2000 Index (by way of a single three year vesting period). The committee and management set demanding performance targets, so that even though the Company’s financial performance was solid in fiscal 2014 and 2015, payouts were not as robust. In fiscal 2016, the Company’s financial performance was stronger than expected, resulting in high payouts under our annual cash incentive plan. executive compensation programs, including both metrics in our annual cash program as well as our long-term performance measurement under our performance-based RSU design. As a result, you will see in the coming pages that executive in compensation had above target payouts. performance-related fiscal 2016 our Set forth below are tables reflecting several performance metrics from the last three fiscal years that impact our NEO compensation. Our revenue increased 1% from fiscal 2014 to fiscal 2015 and increased 7% from fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2016 (dollars in millions): $795 $802 $857 $900 $800 $700 $600 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $0 FY2014 FY2015 7JAN201707372408 FY2016 Our adjusted EBITDA% increased 12% from fiscal 2014 to fiscal 2015 and increased 17% from fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2016: 22.6% 19.3% 17.2% 25 20 15 10 5 0 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 * Adjusted EBITDA% is defined as operating income adjusted for depreciation, amortization, stock-based compensation, major restructuring costs and certain other non-operating income and expense items, such as costs related to the acquisition of 8JAN201710170818 Rofin-Sinar Technologies Inc. 29 Compensation Discussion and Analysis The following chart shows the payout percentages as compared to the committee’s selected target for each of the last fiscal years under our annual variable compensation program: three ANNUAL PAYOUT PERCENTAGE UNDER LAST INCENTIVE PLAN 200% 180% 160% 140% 120% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 151% 85% 33% FY2014 FY2015 10JAN201720304359 FY2016 • Tie compensation to performance of the core business—Our fiscal 2016 annual cash incentive plan was dependent upon Coherent’s achievement against two criteria: adjusted EBITDA dollars and revenue. The committee determined that these were the most effective metrics for tying management’s compensation directly to Coherent’s core operating results for fiscal 2016. • Retain and hire talented executives—Our executives should have market competitive compensation and the committee orients our target total compensation generally near the 50th percentile of the committee’s selected peer group (as noted below), with actual compensation falling above or below depending upon Coherent’s financial performance. compensation components may be above or below such percentile target and varies by individual executive. Additionally, certain • Align compensation with stockholder interests—Our stockholders benefit from continued strong operating performance by the Company and we believe that having a significant portion of compensation tied to equity with both time and performance-based vesting requirements directly returns. The aligns management performance-based RSUs make up the largest potential portion of the equity grants for our CEO. Grants of performance-based RSUs in fiscal 2016 have the same measurement as in fiscal 2015: a single vesting date three years from grant solely dependent upon the performance of stockholder to Coherent’s common stock price measured against the Russell 2000 Index, with target at meeting the index’s performance. For each 1% that Coherent’s common stock exceeds the performance of the Russell 2000 Index for the trailing 90 trading days from the vesting measurement date against the comparable period from the date of grant, the grant recipient will get a 2% increase in the number of shares above target (up to a maximum cap of 200% of target), and for each 1% below the Russell 2000 Index’s performance, a 4% decrease in the number of shares below target (down to zero). As a result, compensation decreases faster for failing to achieve the target than it increases for exceeding it. If Coherent’s stock underperforms the Russell 2000 performance by more than 25%, then there is no payout, but in order to hit the maximum possible payout, Coherent’s stock has to outperform the index by at least 50%. Accordingly, for our executives to achieve the committee’s targeted compensation, Coherent’s common stock must at least meet the Russell 2000 Index. The chart below illustrates this structure: PERFORMANCE RSU VESTING 225 200 175 150 125 100 75 50 25 ) t e g r a T f o % ( t u o y a P Target 0 -75% -50% -25% 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Performance (Percentage Points vs. Index) 10JAN201720304894 Elements of Executive Compensation. During fiscal 2016, the compensation of our NEOs primarily consisted of (A) base salary, (B) participation in our annual variable compensation plan (referred to herein as our ‘‘annual cash incentive plan’’ or ‘‘VCP’’), and (C) long-term equity incentive awards divided between time-based RSUs and performance-based RSUs. For fiscal 2016, on average, approximately 77% of our NEO’s target compensation and approximately 87% of our CEO’s target compensation was delivered through our cash incentive plan and time and performance vesting). long-term equity incentives (both 30 As a demonstration of how executive cash compensation is tied to company performance, the cash compensation for our CEO during fiscal 2016 at target, maximum and actual can be illustrated as follows (dollars in thousands): CEO FY 2016 CASH PAY MIX $2,000 $1,800 $1,600 $1,400 $1,200 $1,000 $800 $600 $400 $200 $0 Cash Bonus 67% Cash Bonus 60% Cash Bonus 50% Base Salary 50% Base Salary 33% Base Salary 40% Compensation Discussion and Analysis • Our performance-based RSU program is measured by the Company’s stock price achievement against the Russell 2000 over a three year period, which the committee believes is a direct connection to long-term total stockholder return; • The committee is composed entirely of directors who satisfy the standards of independence in Coherent’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and Nasdaq listing standards; • The committee makes decisions regarding Mr. Ambroseo’s compensation without him present; • Executive incentive compensation programs include limits on maximum payouts to contain the risk of excessive payouts; • The Committee utilizes an independent compensation consultant; • We have eliminated historical perquisites as an element of Target Maximum Actual compensation for our NEOs; Fixed Variable 10JAN201720574814 Our CEO’s performance-based cash compensation was above target since the Company exceeded the performance criteria under our cash incentive plan. Compensation Governance. ‘‘Pay for performance’’ has been and remains at the core of Coherent’s executive compensation coupled with appropriately managing risk and aligning our compensation programs with long-term stockholder interests. We accomplish this primarily by having a majority of our NEOs’ potential compensation being ‘‘at risk’’ through a combination of (i) a fiscal year variable cash incentive program tied to achievement of financial metrics and (ii) equity grant vesting tied to achievement of a performance metric. The committee monitors and considers evolving governance approaches and standards in executive compensation, as well as communications it receives directly from stockholders. As more fully discussed below, recent examples of how this philosophy is applied and changes made pursuant to compensation practices as well as governance practices in effect during fiscal 2016, include: • We have a recoupment or ‘‘claw-back’’ policy for our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as described below; • We have minimum share ownership requirements for our Chief Executive Officer and members of the Board of Directors; • Our change-of-control plan provides for payment only in ‘‘double-trigger’’ circumstances, that is a change of control coupled with a termination of employment; • None of our NEOs are entitled to any ‘‘gross-up’’ to offset the impact of IRS Code Sections 280G or 4999 in connection with a change of control; and • None of our NEOs have other than ‘‘at will’’ employment. Our stockholders have historically strongly supported our executive compensation philosophy and design as seen in the significant majorities approving our ‘‘say on pay’’ proposal (does not include broker non-votes; rounded): Say on Pay Stockholder Votes 98% 97% 98% 2% 0% 3% 0% 2% 1% FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 Votes For Votes Against Abstentions 7JAN201707084033 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 31 Compensation Discussion and Analysis Role of Management The committee regularly meets with Mr. Ambroseo, our Chief Executive Officer, to obtain recommendations with respect to the compensation programs, practices and packages for our NEOs other than Mr. Ambroseo. Additionally, Mr. Palatnik, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Mr. DiMarco, our Executive Vice President. General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, and members of our human resources department are regularly invited to meetings of the committee or otherwise asked to assist the committee. the committee and The assistance of these individuals include providing financial its for information and analysis compensation consultant, taking minutes of the meeting or providing legal advice, developing compensation proposals for consideration, and providing insights regarding our employees (executive and otherwise) and the business context for the committee’s decisions. NEOs attend portions of committee meetings when invited by the committee, but leave the meetings when matters potentially affecting them are discussed. Role of the Committee’s Compensation Consultant The committee utilizes the services of an independent fiscal 2016, engaged compensation consultant and Compensia as its independent compensation consultant. Compensia assisted the committee by: in • Reviewing and analyzing our executive compensation program, including providing NEO tally sheets to the Committee at each of its regular meetings; • Providing market data and ranges for fiscal 2016 compensation; and • Providing further insight on compensation governance trends. Additionally, in fiscal 2016, Compensia was retained by the Governance and Nominating Committee to review, analyze and make recommendations regarding compensation for service on the Board of Directors and its committees. The independent compensation consultant serves at the discretion of the committee and is not permitted to do other work for Coherent unless expressly authorized by the committee. Since retention, Compensia has not performed any work for Coherent other than its work with the committee, the Board of Directors or other committees of the Board of Directors. The committee is focused on maintaining the independence of its compensation consultant and, accordingly, does not anticipate having its consultant perform any other work for the Company in addition to its direct work for the committee, the Board, or another committee of the Board. The committee has assessed the independence of Compensia and concluded that no conflict of interest exists. in and maintains a The Company also participates subscription to the Radford Global Technology Survey. This survey provides benchmark data and compensation practices reports of a broad cross-section of technology companies similar in size to Coherent to assist us with regards to employee compensation generally. Pay Positioning Strategy and Benchmarking of Compensation Philosophically the committee initially orients target total compensation for our NEOs generally near the 50th percentile of our peers (as measured by our designated peer group and, when applicable, data from the Radford Global Technology Survey), resulting in targeted total compensation that is competitive for performance that meets the objectives established by the committee. An NEO’s actual salary, cash incentive compensation opportunity and equity compensation grant value may fall below or above the target position based on the individual’s experience, seniority, skills, knowledge, performance and contributions as well as the historical pay structure for each executive. These factors are weighed individually by the committee in its judgment, and no single factor takes precedence over others nor is any formula used in making these decisions. In light of the fact that the committee 32 has designed the significant majority of the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation to be at risk, including 2⁄3 of his long-term equity compensation, for fiscal 2016 the committee asked Compensia to provide information at the 50th and 75th percentile for our Chief Executive Officer. Given the significant ties to performance and with such a large percentage of his potential compensation at risk, the committee oriented his compensation target closer to the 75th percentile. The Chief Executive Officer’s review of the performance of the other NEOs is considered by the committee in making individual pay decisions. With respect to the Chief Executive Officer, the performance of Coherent as a whole and the views of the committee additionally considered the Board of Directors regarding the Chief Executive Officer’s performance. Actual realized pay is higher or lower than the targeted amounts for each individual based primarily on the Company’s performance. For example, the performance RSUs granted in 2013 only vested in 2016 as to 60% of target, which resulted in value received that is significantly lower than the ‘‘accounting value’’ for equity compensation for each NEO reflected in the summary compensation table for that year. target market positioning, In analyzing our executive compensation program relative to the committee reviews this information provided by independent compensation its consultant, which includes an analysis of data from peer companies’ proxy filings with respect to similarly situated individuals at the peer companies (when available) and the Radford Global Technology Survey (as a supplement when peer group company data is unavailable). It is important to note that these are the peers selected by the committee. The committee uses criteria as described below in determining the appropriate group. There are proxy advisory services which use their own criteria to select peers for the Company and, accordingly, stockholders should be aware that these advisory services do not, in fact, follow the same methodology of the committee and there may be wide variances between the different peer groups used by these services. Any comparison of company performance or market data for executive compensation using a completely different peer group will, therefore, naturally result in a different analysis. We encourage our stockholders to consider the peer group used in any comparisons and direct any questions to the committee regarding such comparisons or any other matters when considering how to vote on Proposal Three. For pay decisions made for fiscal 2016, after consulting with our independent compensation consultant, the committee determined that the following companies comprise the peer group for fiscal 2016: Compensation Discussion and Analysis Emulex (subsequently acquired) Entegris (ENTG) FEI Company (FEIC) Finisar Corp. (FNSR) FLIR Systems, Inc. (FLIR) Harmonic (HLIT) Infinera (INFN) Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE) MKS Instruments (MKSI) MTS Systems Corp. (MTSC) National Instruments (NATI) Newport Corporation (subsequently acquired) OSI Systems (OSIS) Plantronics (PLT) PMC-Sierra, Inc. (PMCS) (subsequently acquired) Polycom (PLCM) (subsequently acquired) Several factors are considered in selecting the peer group, the most important of which are: Primary Criteria • Industry (primarily companies in the Electronic Equipment and Semiconductor sub-industry classifications defined by the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) system); and • Revenue level (primarily companies with annual revenues between 0.5x-2.0x that of Coherent). Secondary Criteria • Market capitalization between 0.25x and 3.0x of Coherent; • Market capitalization as a multiple of revenues of greater than 1.5x; and • A disclosed peer of a peer company. The committee reviews the composition of the peer group annually to ensure it is the most relevant set of companies to use for comparison purposes. Components of Our Executive Compensation Program The principal components of our executive officer compensation and employment arrangements during fiscal 2016 included: • Base salary; • Annual cash incentive plan; • Equity awards; and • Other benefits. 33 Compensation Discussion and Analysis table shows the components of These components were selected because the committee believes that a combination of salary, incentive pay and benefits is necessary to help us attract and retain the executive talent on which Coherent’s success depends. The total direct following compensation at target for our NEOs as a group for fiscal 2016. In maintaining the design for fiscal 2016, the committee recognized the Company’s stockholders for the compensation program design, as reflected in the continued overwhelming vote totals in favor of our executive compensation through our annual ‘‘say-on-pay’’ proposal. the significant support received from CEO AND NEO (OTHER THAN CEO) FY2016 DIRECT COMPENSATION MIX 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 21% 53% 13% 13% 42% 22% 13% 23% 11% 31% 65% 33% 16% 8% 20% 16% CEO Target NEO Target CEO Maximum NEO Maximum Base Salary Annual Incentive Performance-Based RSUs Time-Based RSUs 10JAN201720304626 Base Salary Base salary is the foundation to providing an appropriate total direct compensation package. We use base salary to fairly and competitively compensate our executives for the jobs we ask them to perform. This is the most stable component of our executive compensation program, as this amount is not at risk. The committee reviewed market data information provided by Compensia with respect to similarly situated individuals to assist it in determining the base salary for each NEO, depending upon the particular executive’s experience, seniority, skills, knowledge, performance and contribution. There were no increases to the base salaries of our NEOs for fiscal 2016. Variable Cash Incentive Compensation A substantial portion of each individual’s potential short-term compensation is in the form of variable incentive cash compensation tied to committee-established goals. In fiscal 34 2016, Coherent maintained one incentive cash program under which executive officers were eligible to receive annual cash incentives, the 2016 Variable Compensation Plan (‘‘2016 VCP’’). 2016 VCP The 2016 VCP was designed as an ‘‘at risk’’ bonus compensation program to promote a focus on Coherent’s growth and profitability. It provided incentive compensation opportunity in line with targeted market rates to our NEOs. Under the 2016 VCP, participants were eligible to receive bi-annual bonuses (with measurement periods for the first half and the second half of the 2016 fiscal year). In setting the performance goals at the beginning of the fiscal year, the committee assessed the anticipated difficulty and importance to the success of Coherent of achieving the performance goals. The actual awards (if any) payable for each semi-annual period varied depending on the extent to which actual performance met, exceeded or fell short of the goals approved by the committee. The 2016 VCP goals were tied to Coherent achieving varying levels of revenue and adjusted EBITDA dollars (‘‘adjusted EBITDA $’’), with revenue weighted at 25% and adjusted EBITDA $ weighted at 75%. Each performance metric is measured and paid out independently, but the revenue payout is capped at 100% achievement until adjusted EBITDA $ reaches a minimum dollar target. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and certain other non-operating income and expense items and other items, such as the impact of stock option expensing under the Accounting Standards Codification 718, ‘‘Compensation—Stock Compensation’’ and certain acquisition related expenses. The Committee also reviews the financial impact of mergers and acquisitions to determine if any adjustments in VCP are required. Each measurement period had the same range of between zero and 200%, with target at 100% of the executive’s participation rate. Fiscal 2016 Variable Compensation Plan Scale for NEOs Revenue achievement for the first half of fiscal 2016 was $390.2 million, with a corresponding cash incentive payout of approximately 16.7% of target. Adjusted EBITDA $ achievement for the first half of fiscal 2016 was $88.7 million, with a corresponding cash incentive payout of approximately 130.2% of target. The weighted, combined cash incentive payout for the first half was approximately 101.8% of target. First Half Fiscal 2016 VCP Scale Revenue $ (in millions) Payout $386.0 (threshold) $390.2 (actual) $410.9 (target) $436.0 0% 16.7% (actual) 100% 200% Adjusted EBITDA $ (in millions) Payout $69.0 (threshold) $84.1 (target) $88.7 (actual) $99.3 0% 100% 130.2% (actual) 200% Revenue achievement for the second half of fiscal 2016 was $467.2 million, with a corresponding cash incentive payout of 219.9%. Adjusted EBITDA$ achievement for the second half of fiscal 2016 was $123.9 million, with a corresponding cash incentive payout of approximately 283.6% of target. The weighted, combined cash incentive payout for the second half was 200% of target, which is the maximum bonus payout under the terms of the plan. Second Half Fiscal 2016 VCP Scale Revenue $ (in millions) Payout $409.0 (threshold) $435.7 (target) $462.0 $467.2 (actual) 0% 100% 200% 219.9% (actual) Adjusted EBITDA $ (in millions) Payout $81.0 (threshold) $96.2 (target) $111.3 $123.9 (actual) 0% 100% 200% 283.6% (actual) Compensation Discussion and Analysis The tables below describe for each NEO under the 2016 VCP (i) the target percentage of base salary, (ii) the potential award range as a percentage of base salary, and (iii) the actual award earned for the measurement period in fiscal 2016. First Half of Fiscal 2016 Named Executive Officer Payout Target Percentage Range of Salary Percentage of Salary Actual Award as a Actual Percentage of Target Award Award(2) ($)(1) John Ambroseo 100% Kevin Palatnik Helene Simonet Mark Sobey Paul Sechrist Bret DiMarco 70% 70% 65% 50% 50% 0-200% 318,166 0-140% 33,962(3) 0-140% 147,205 0-130% 124,880 0-100% 109,042 0-100% 87,432 101.8% 101.8% 101.8% 101.8% 101.8% 101.8% Second Half of Fiscal of 2016 Named Executive Officer Payout Target Percentage Range of Salary Percentage of Salary Actual Award as a Actual Percentage of Target Award Award(2) ($)(1) John Ambroseo 100% 0-200% 625,019 Kevin Palatnik Mark Sobey Paul Sechrist Bret DiMarco Helene Simonet(4) 70% 65% 50% 50% — 0-140% 289,103 0-130% 245,320 0-100% 214,207 0-100% 171,756 — — 200% 200% 200% 200% 200% — (1) Reflects gross amounts earned during the applicable half of fiscal 2016. (2) This reflects the aggregate bonuses earned by the NEOs for the applicable half of fiscal 2016 under the 2016 VCP. (3) Mr. Palatnik’s bonus for the first half of fiscal 2016 was pro rated for the portion of the period in which he was employed by us. (4) As noted, Ms. Simonet retired as an executive officer in February 2016. Equity Awards We believe that equity awards provide a strong alignment between the interests of our executives and our stockholders. We seek to provide equity award opportunities that are consistent with our compensation philosophy, with the potential for increase for exceptional financial performance, consistent with the reasonable management of overall equity compensation expense and stockholder dilution. Finally, we believe that long-term equity awards are an essential tool in promoting executive retention. For fiscal 2016, our long-term incentive program included the grant of time-based RSUs and 35 Compensation Discussion and Analysis performance-based RSUs. These components provide a reward for past corporate and individual performance and as an incentive for future performance. Our performance-based RSU grants are tied to the Company’s performance and, as a result, may fluctuate from no vesting to vesting which is above target. When making the committee reviews a compensation overview prepared by its independent compensation consultant which reflects potential long-term realizable value under current short and compensation arrangements for each NEO. its compensation decisions, Fiscal 2016 Equity Grants For fiscal 2016, the committee based the equity program on a combination of time-based and performance-based RSUs over a three year period. In particular, the committee determined to measure achievement for the performance grants by the relative performance of Coherent’s stock price in comparison to the Russell 2000 Index. The committee believed that using the Russell 2000 Index (in which Coherent is a member) as a proxy of total stockholder return directly aligns executive compensation with stockholder interest. The committee determined that both the performance-based and time-based RSU grants provide a further retention tool in that the time-based grants vest over three years with pro rata annual vesting and, for the performance-based grants, a single measurement period three years from the date of grant with three-year cliff vesting shortly thereafter if such grants vest at all since such grants vest purely based on performance. Performance-based RSU grants in fiscal 2016 vest solely dependent upon the performance of Coherent’s common stock price measured against the Russell 2000 Index. For each 1% that Coherent’s common stock exceeds the performance of the Russell 2000 Index for the trailing 90 trading days from the vesting measurement date against the comparable period from the date of grant, the grant recipient will get a 2% increase in the number of shares above target (up to a maximum cap of 200% of target), and for each 1% below the Russell 2000 Index’s performance, a 4% decrease in the number of shares (down to zero). As a result, compensation decreases faster for failing to achieve the target than it increases for exceeding it. The performance-based RSUs make up the largest potential portion of the equity grants for our Chief Executive Officer. The following table summarizes some of the key features of our fiscal 2016 equity grants: Type Vesting for RSUs Vesting for PRSUs PRSU Metrics Fiscal 2016 Equity Grants RSUs and PRSUs One-third each grant anniversary Single vesting date three years from grant 100% tied to Russell 2000 Index Minimum vest: zero Target vest: Even with Russell 2000 Index Maximum vest: 200% of target For our Chief Executive Officer, greater than half of his total equity awards are performance-based. Accordingly, for our Chief Executive Officer, at target, approximately 66% of his equity awards are performance-based and at maximum achievement that percentage increases to approximately 80%. In the event of a change of control of the Company, the performance-based grants will be measured, with respect to performance periods not yet completed, by the relative stock performance of Coherent in comparison to the Russell 2000 Index through the date of the change of control and such performance-based shares would, subject to the terms of the Change of Control Severance Plan, to time-based vesting with a single vesting date at the three year anniversary of the grant. then convert 36 Compensation Discussion and Analysis the Equity Award Practices Equity grants to our employees are driven by our annual review process. Grant guidelines are based on competitive market practices. Typically, an eligible employee is granted first committee meeting after beginning equity at employment and may be eligible for periodic grants thereafter. Eligibility for and the size of grants are influenced by the then-current guidelines for non-executive officer grants and the individual’s performance or particular requirements at the time of hire. No option grants have been made to an employee since 2010. (at maximum), to stock units In fiscal 2016 the committee granted an aggregate of 379,295 time-based and performance-based shares subject restricted representing approximately 1.56% of Coherent’s outstanding common stock as of September 30, 2016 (excluding automatic and initial grants to directors). With the assistance of Compensia, the committee has reviewed this burn rate relative to peer practices and guidance Institutional Shareholder from Services (ISS) and found that the total dilution was consistent with the median of peer practices and complied with ISS guidelines. During fiscal 2016 equity grants were only made at meetings of the committee. Chief Executive Officer Minimum Stock Ownership Guidelines During fiscal 2012, the committee adopted mandatory stock ownership guidelines for our Chief Executive Officer. Our guidelines require that the Chief Executive Officer hold shares with a value of at least three times base salary, without counting vested or unvested option grants or unvested grants of RSUs. Compliance is measured as of the date of each year’s annual meeting based on the stock price of the shares as of the date of their acquisition. In the event that our Chief Executive Officer does not satisfy the minimum requirements, then 25% of the net after-tax shares (e.g. exercised options/ shares received on the vesting of RSUs) are required to be held until the guidelines are met. As of December 31, 2016, Mr. Ambroseo held outstanding stock worth approximately 31 times his base salary and, accordingly, significantly exceeded the minimum stock ownership guidelines. The following charts show the aggregate composition of equity grants for fiscal 2016 to our Chief Executive Officer, at target and at maximum achievement under the terms of the performance-based grants: FY 2016 EQUITY GRANT COMPONENTS 33% AT TARGET ACHIEVEMENT 67% 19% AT MAXIMUM ACHIEVEMENT 81% Time-Based RSUs Performance-Based RSUs 12JAN201714264596 The following tables reflect the equity grants to the NEOs during fiscal 2016: Named Executive Officer John Ambroseo Kevin Palatnik Mark Sobey Paul Sechrist Bret DiMarco Helene Simonet Time-Based RSU Grants 16,500 15,750 8,604 7,335 7,500 — Performance-Based Performance-Based RSU Grants Range RSU Grants (issuance dependent upon achievement) at Target 34,250 7,870 4,302 3,667 3,750 — 0 - 68,500 0 - 15,740 0 - 8,604 0 - 7,334 0 - 7,500 — 37 Compensation Discussion and Analysis Other Benefits Retirement Plans Executive officers are eligible to participate in our 401(k) Retirement Plan on the same terms as all other U.S. employees, including a 4% Company matching contribution. Our 401(k) Retirement Plan is intended to be a tax-qualified plan and therefore is subject to certain Internal Revenue Code limitations on the dollar amounts of deferrals and Company contributions that can be made to plan accounts. These limitations apply to our more highly-compensated employees (including the NEOs). We maintain a Deferred Compensation Plan for certain employees and members of the Board. The Deferred Compensation Plan permits eligible participants to defer receipt of compensation pursuant to the terms of the plan. The to Deferred Compensation Plan permits participants contribute, on a pre-tax basis, up to 75% of their base salary earnings, up to 100% of their bonus pay and commissions and up to 100% of directors’ annual retainer earned in the upcoming plan year. We provide no matching or other additional contributions to such Deferred Compensation Plan. Plan participants may invest deferrals in a variety of different deemed investment options. To preserve the tax-deferred status of deferred compensation plans, the IRS requires that the available ‘‘deemed investments.’’ Participants do not have an ownership interest in the funds they select; the funds are only used to measure the gains or losses that are attributed to the participant’s deferral account over time. investment alternatives be The committee considers the Deferred Compensation Plan to be a reasonable and appropriate program because it promotes executive officer retention by offering a deferred compensation plan that is comparable to and competitive with what is offered by our peer group of companies. Employee Stock Purchase Plan Our stockholders have approved an employee stock purchase plan whereby employees can purchase shares for a discount, subject to various participation limitations. As employees, our NEOs are eligible to participate in this plan. Severance and Change of Control Arrangements Our Change of Control Severance Plan (the ‘‘Change of Control Plan’’) provides certain benefits in the event of a change of control of Coherent for certain executives, including each of our NEOs. Benefits are provided if there is a change in ownership of Coherent, a change in effective control of Coherent, or a change in ownership of a substantial portion of Coherent’s assets (in each case as construed under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations thereunder)(a ‘‘change of control’’) and within two years thereafter (or within two months prior thereto) the participant’s employment is terminated without cause or voluntarily terminates following a constructive termination event. The committee believes the Change of Control Plan serves as an important retention tool in the event of a pending change of control transaction. The committee completed its review of the provisions of the Change of Control Plan during fiscal 2015 and determined to review the plan again in four years. Compensia assisted the Committee in its review and analysis of the Change of Control Plan. The committee believes that reviewing the Change of Control Plan every four years allows for the right balance in providing certainty for the participants while providing the committee with the opportunity to revise the plan consistent with corporate governance best practices, evolving peer group practices and regulatory changes. The committee does not consider the potential payments and benefits under these arrangements when making compensation decisions for our NEOs. These arrangements serve specific purposes unrelated to the determination of the NEOs’ total direct compensation for a specific year. Tax and Accounting Considerations Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—We account for stock-based compensation the requirements of ASC 718. We also take into consideration ASC 718 and other generally accepted accounting principles in determining changes to policies and practices for our stock- based compensation programs. in accordance with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code—This section limits Coherent’s income tax deduction of compensation for our Chief Executive Officer and our four other most highly compensated NEOs (other than the Chief Financial Officer) unless the compensation is less than $1 million during any fiscal year or is ‘‘performance-based’’ under Section 162(m). Our 2001 Stock Plan and 2011 Plan are designed to permit 38 Compensation Discussion and Analysis option grants and certain performance-based full value awards to be fully tax-deductible. Cash compensation (including both base salary and payments under our 2016 VCP) and time-based full-value awards are not qualified as ‘‘performance-based’’ compensation under Section 162(m). We may from time to time pay compensation to our executive officers (including under our VCP) that may not be tax deductible when, that such compensation is appropriate and in the best interests of the stockholders after taking various factors into consideration, including business conditions and the performance of the executive officer. In addition, due to the ambiguities and for example, we believe uncertainties as to the application and interpretation of Section 162(m) as well as operational issues, no assurances can be given that compensation, even if intended to satisfy the requirements for deductibility under Section 162(m), would in fact do so. Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code—Section 409A imposes additional significant taxes in the event that an executive officer, director or service provider received ‘‘deferred compensation’’ the requirements of Section 409A. We consider Section 409A in the design and operation of any plans. that does not satisfy Other Compensation Policies To further align our executive compensation program with the interests of our stockholders, at the end of fiscal 2009, a committee of the Board approved a recoupment policy. The recoupment policy provides that, in the event that there is an accounting restatement and there is a finding by the Board that such restatement was due to the gross recklessness or intentional misconduct of the Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer and it caused material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement, then Coherent shall seek disgorgement of any portion of the bonus or other incentive or equity based compensation related to such accounting restatement received by such individual during the 12-month period following the originally filed financial document. Under our Insider Trading Policy, no employees or directors are allowed to hedge or pledge Coherent securities. The Committee continues to monitor the SEC rule-making related to Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Act. Following the final rules being adopted by the SEC, the Committee intends to review and update its clawback policy. Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation During fiscal 2016, the Compensation and H.R. Committee of the Board consisted of Messrs. Vij (Chair), Flatley and Krause. None of the members of the committee has been or is an officer or employee of Coherent. None of our executive officers serve on the board of directors or compensation committee of a company that has an executive officer that serves on our Board or Compensation and H.R. Committee. No member of our Board is an executive officer of a company in which one of our executive officers serves as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of that company. Committee Independence Each of the members of the committee qualifies as (i) an ‘‘independent director’’ under the requirements of The Nasdaq Stock Market, (ii) a ‘‘non-employee director’’ under Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘1934 Act’’), (iii) an ‘‘outside director’’ under Section 162(m) of the Code and (iv) an ‘‘independent outside director’’ as that term is defined by ISS. Compensation and H.R. Committee Report The Compensation and H.R. Committee of the Board has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation and H.R. Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement. Respectfully submitted by the Compensation and H.R. Committee Sandeep Vij, Chair Jay Flatley L. William Krause 39 Compensation Discussion and Analysis RECONCILIATION TABLE—NON-GAAP EARNINGS PER SHARE GAAP NET INCOME PER DILUTED SHARE Stock-based compensation Amortization of intangible assets Non-recurring tax benefit Customs audit Impairment of investment Costs related to acquisition of Rofin-Sinar Technologies Inc. Interest expense on Barclays debt commitment Loss on hedge of Barclays debt commitment Gain on business combination Purchase accounting step up $ Fiscal Year $ 2016 3.58 0.63 0.24 (0.05) — — 0.26 0.03 0.06 — — 2015 3.06 0.56 0.25 (0.04) 0.05 0.05 — — — (0.05) 0.01 $ 2014 2.36 0.54 0.29 — — — — — — — — NON-GAAP NET INCOME PER DILUTED SHARE $ 4.75 $ 3.89 $ 3.19 RECONCILIATION TABLE—ADJUSTED EBITDA $ (in millions) GAAP NET INCOME Income tax expense Interest and other income (expense), net Depreciation and amortization Costs related to acquisition of Rofin-Sinar Technologies Inc. Gain on business combination Restructuring charges and other Impairment of investment Stock-based compensation Purchase accounting step up $ Fiscal Year 2016 2015 2014 $ 87.5 35.4 6.7 34.4 9.8 — — — 20.2 — $ 76.4 23.2 1.1 33.0 — (1.3) 1.3 2.0 18.2 0.6 59.1 20.1 2.0 36.2 — — — — 18.9 — ADJUSTED EBITDA $ $ 194.0 $ 154.5 $ 136.3 40 SUMMARY COMPENSATION AND EQUITY TABLES Fiscal 2016 Summary Compensation Table The table below presents information concerning the total compensation of our NEOs for the fiscal years ended October 1, 2016, October 3, 2015, and September 27, 2014. Name and Principal Position John Ambroseo, President and Chief Executive Officer Kevin Palatnik(5), Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Helene Simonet, Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Mark Sobey, Executive Vice President and General Manager, Specialty Laser Systems Paul Sechrist, Executive Vice President Worldwide Sales and Services Bret DiMarco, Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary Fiscal Year Salary ($) Non-Equity All Other Incentive Plan Stock Awards Compensation Compensation ($)(4) ($)(3) ($)(2) 2016 2015 2014 2016 2016 2015 2014 2016 2015 2014 2016 2015 2014 2016 2015 2014 625,019(1) 625,019 625,019 238,272(1) 3,558,430 2,773,100 3,387,440 1,909,158 327,254(1) 411,553 405,018 377,416(1) 375,992 370,011 357,011(1) 355,663 350,002 343,512(1) 341,876 335,005 — 784,179 758,864 845,773 737,120 713,227 720,993 628,385 608,035 737,250 642,537 621,766 943,185 529,891 208,631 323,065 147,205 245,164 94,636 370,201 207,983 80,281 323,249 151,337 58,415 259,188 145,615 55,912 12,631 11,776 11,596 11,940 6,432 14,098 13,918 12,922 12,565 11,596 12,922 12,856 12,427 11,410 11,344 11,164 Total ($) 5,139,265 3,939,786 4,232,686 2,482,435 480,891 1,454,994 1,272,436 1,606,312 1,333,660 1,175,115 1,414,175 1,148,241 1,028,879 1,351,360 1,141,372 1,023,847 (1) Reflects the dollar amount of salary earned in fiscal year 2016. Ms. Simonet served as the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer through February 21, 2016, as a special advisor to the Chief Executive Officer from February 22, 2016 through April 4, 2016, and as a consultant through the fiscal year ended October 1, 2016 earning $55,556 in consulting payments, which is reflected in the salary column. (2) Amounts shown reflect the grant date fair value of awards granted in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 718. Reflects unvested time-based and performance-based restricted stock units; there is no guaranty that the recipients will ultimately receive this amount, or any amount. See Footnote 3 to the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table for additional information. No stock options were granted to the NEOs in fiscal years 2016, 2015, and 2014. (3) Reflects the dollar amounts earned under the Variable Compensation Plan (VCP) during fiscal years 2016, 2015, and 2014. (4) During fiscal year 2016, each of the NEOs received a 401(k) match of approximately $10,600, with the exception of Ms. Simonet, who received a 401(k) match of approximately $4,500. The dollar amounts in this column also include imputed income for group term life insurance. (5) Mr. Palatnik joined the Company on February 22, 2016. His salary, non-equity incentive plan compensation and other amounts in the Summary Compensation Table reflect payments for the period of February 22, 2016 through October 1, 2016. 41 Summary Compensation and Equity Tables Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2016 Except as set forth in the footnotes, the following table shows all plan-based equity and non-equity incentive awards granted to our NEOs during fiscal 2016. Our NEOs did not receive any option awards during fiscal 2016. Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards Actual Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Maxi- Plan Awards Thresh- Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards Type Grant Date Thresh- hold($)(1) Target($) mum($) Maxi- ($)(2) hold(#) Target(#) mum(#) All Other Stock Awards: # of Securities Grant Underlying Date Fair Value ($)(3) Options (#) Name John Ambroseo PRSU RSU 1st semi-annual bonus 2nd semi-annual bonus Total Kevin Palatnik PRSU RSU 1st semi-annual bonus 2nd semi-annual bonus Total Helene Simonet PRSU RSU 1st semi-annual bonus 2nd semi-annual bonus Mark Sobey Total PRSU RSU 1st semi-annual bonus 2nd semi-annual bonus Paul Sechrist Total PRSU RSU 1st semi-annual bonus 2nd semi-annual bonus Bret DiMarco Total PRSU RSU 11/13/2015 11/13/2015 02/25/2016 02/25/2016 11/13/2015 11/13/2015 11/13/2015 11/13/2015 11/13/2015 11/13/2015 0 312,510 625,019 0 312,510 625,019 0 625,020 1,250,038 318,166 625,019 943,185 0 144,552 289,103 0 144,552 289,103 0 289,103 578,206 33,962 289,103 323,065 0 144,552 289,103 147,205 0 — — — 0 144,552 289,103 147,205 0 122,660 245,320 0 122,660 245,320 0 245,320 490,640 124,880 245,320 370,200 0 107,104 214,207 0 107,104 214,207 0 214,207 428,414 109,042 214,207 323,249 0 34,250 68,500 2,550,940 16,500 1,007,490 0 7,870 15,740 586,158 15,750 1,323,000 0 4,302 8,604 320,413 8,604 525,360 0 3,667 7,334 273,118 7,335 447,875 0 3,750 7,500 279,300 7,500 457,950 1st semi-annual bonus 2nd semi-annual bonus Total 0 0 85,878 85,878 171,756 171,756 0 171,756 343,512 87,432 171,756 259,188 (1) Failure to meet a minimum level of performance would have resulted in no bonus paid out under the 2016 Variable Compensation Plan. (2) Reflects the amount earned under the 2016 Variable Compensation Plan during the 2016 fiscal year. (3) Reflects the dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes (disregarding an estimate of forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions) for fiscal 2016 in accordance with ASC 718, and includes grants made in fiscal 2016. The assumptions used in the valuation of these awards are set forth in Note 12 ‘‘Employee Stock Option and Benefits Plans’’ of the Financial Statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K. For informational purposes, if the maximum level of performance for the PRSU awards was achieved, the value, calculated by multiplying the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant by the number of shares issuable upon achievement of the maximum level of performance under the PRSU is $4,182,610, $1,322,160, $525,360, $447,814 and $457,950, for Mr. Ambroseo, Mr. Palatnik, Mr. Sobey, Mr. Sechrist and Mr. DiMarco, respectively. These amounts do not correspond to the actual value, if any, that will be recognized by the NEOs. See ‘‘Compensation Discussion and Analysis-Equity Awards’’ for a description of the PRSUs. 42 Summary Compensation and Equity Tables Option Exercises and Stock Vested at 2016 Fiscal Year-End The table below sets forth certain information for each NEO regarding the exercise of options and the vesting of stock awards during the fiscal year ended October 1, 2016, including the aggregate value realized upon such exercise or vesting. John Ambroseo Kevin Palatnik Helene Simonet Mark Sobey Paul Sechrist Bret DiMarco Option Awards Stock Awards Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) Number of Shares Value Realized Acquired on Vesting (#) on Exercise ($)(1) Value Realized on Vesting ($)(2) — — — — 8,000 — — — — — 326,344 — 38,401 — 8,343 7,860 6,680 6,351 2,338,722 — 503,690 474,544 403,286 383,094 (1) Reflects the difference between the exercise price of the option and market price of our common stock on the exercise date. (2) Reflects the market price of our common stock on the vesting date. 43 Summary Compensation and Equity Tables Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2016 Year-End The following table presents information concerning stock that has not yet vested for each NEO outstanding as of October 1, 2016. Option Awards(1) Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Option Number of Securities Underlying Options (#) Stock Awards Number of Market Value Shares or of Shares or Units of Equity incentive plan awards: Market or payout value of unearned shares, units Stock That or other rights or other rights that have that have Vested ($)(2) not vested (#) not vested ($) Equity incentive plan awards: Number of unearned shares, units Have Not Units of Option Stock That Have Not Date Vested (#) Name Grant Date exercisable unexercisable Price ($) Options (#) Exercise Expiration John Ambroseo Helene Simonet Kevin Palatnik Mark Sobey Paul Sechrist Bret DiMarco 11/13/2015 11/13/2015 11/3/2014 11/3/2014 11/8/2013 11/8/2013 11/3/2014 11/3/2014 11/8/2013 11/8/2013 2/25/2016 2/25/2016 11/13/2015 11/13/2015 11/3/2014 11/3/2014 11/8/2013 11/8/2013 11/13/2015 11/13/2015 11/3/2014 11/3/2014 11/8/2013 11/8/2013 11/13/2015 11/13/2015 11/3/2014 11/3/2014 11/8/2013 11/8/2013 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 68,500(3) 7,571,990 16,500 1,823,910 — — — — 53,600(4) 5,924,944 9,066 1,002,156 — — — 5,666 — 5,221 — 2,431 — — 626,320 — 577,129 — 268,723 — 15,750 1,741,005 — 8,604 — 4,908 — 2,285 — 7,335 — 4,184 — 1,948 — 7,500 — 4,278 — 1,992 — 951,086 — 542,530 — 252,584 — 810,811 — 462,499 — 215,332 — 829,050 — 472,890 — 220,196 59,000(5) 6,521,860 — 7,832(4) — 7,296(5) — — 865,749 — 806,500 — 15,740(3) 1,739,900 — 8,604(3) — 7,362(4) — 6,856(5) — 7,334(3) — 6,276(4) 5,846(5) — 7,500(3) — 6,418(4) — 5,978(5) — — 951,086 — 813,795 — 757,862 — 810,700 — 693,749 646,217 — 829,050 — 709,446 — 660,808 — (1) Each of the unvested option grants set forth above vest in three equal installments on the anniversary of the date of grant. (2) Market value is determined by multiplying the number of shares by $110.54, the closing price of the Company’s common stock on September 30, 2016, the last trading date of the fiscal year. (3) The performance-based RSU vesting determination date is November 13, 2018. The performance-based RSUs will vest in an amount which is 0-200% subject to the achievement of certain performance metrics. The amount reflected in the table is the maximum amount or 200%. (4) The performance-based RSU vesting determination date is November 3, 2017. The performance-based RSUs will vest in an amount which is 0-200% subject to the achievement of certain performance metrics. The amount reflected in the table is the maximum amount or 200%. (5) The performance-based RSU vesting determination date was November 8, 2016. The performance-based RSUs vested at 200% based on the achievement of certain performance metrics. 44 Summary Compensation and Equity Tables Fiscal 2016 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation For a description of our Deferred Compensation Plan, see ‘‘Compensation Discussion and Analysis-Retirement Plans.’’ The following table presents information regarding the non-qualified deferred compensation activity for each NEO during fiscal 2016: Executive Executive Deferrals Contributions including Company Contribution in Last FY ($) in last FY ($)(1) Registrant Aggregate Contributions Earnings in Aggregate Withdrawals/ in Last FY ($)(2) Last FY ($) Distributions ($) 322,322 — 107,291 — — — 197,438 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 841,805 159,861 93,997 16,230 94,936 29,931 44,321 11,520 — — — — — — — — Aggregate Balance at Last FYE ($)(3) 9,188,195 1,682,943 1,292,813 172,242 963,782 240,177 480,415 98,138 Name John Ambroseo SRP(4) Helene Simonet SRP(4) Paul Sechrist SRP(4) Mark Sobey Bret DiMarco (1) Amounts in this column consist of salary and/or bonus earned during fiscal 2016, which is also reported in the Summary Compensation Table. (2) Deferred Compensation company contributions were terminated on December 31, 2010. (3) The deferred compensation in a participant’s account is fully vested and is credited with positive or negative investment results based upon plan investment options selected by the participant. (4) Amounts include account balances (including earnings) from the Supplementary Retirement Plan (SRP) which was suspended on December 31, 2004. The Deferred Compensation Plan is the only non-qualified deferred compensation plan available for executive management. 45 Summary Compensation and Equity Tables Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control The following table shows the potential payments and benefits that we (or our successor) would be obligated to make or provide upon termination of employment of each our NEOs pursuant to the terms of the Change of Control Severance Plan. Other than this plan, there are no other executive employment agreements or other contractual obligations triggered upon a change of control. For purposes of this table, it is assumed that each NEO’s employment terminated at the close of business on September 30, 2016 (the last trading date before the end of our fiscal year on October 1, 2016). These payments are conditioned upon the execution of a form release of claims by the NEO in favor of us. The amounts reported below do not include the nonqualified deferred compensation distributions that would be made to the NEOs following a termination of employment (for those amounts and descriptions, see the prior table). There can be no assurance that a triggering event would produce the same or similar results as those estimated below if such event occurs on any other date or at any other price, of if any other assumption used to estimate potential payments and benefits is not correct. Due to the number of factors that affect the nature and amount of any potential payments or benefits, any actual payments and benefits may be different. These are aggregate payments and do not reflect such individual’s net after tax benefit. No officer is entitled to any ‘‘gross up’’ to offset the impact of IRS Code Section 280G. NEO Multiplier for Base Salary and Bonus John Ambroseo 2.99X Kevin Palatnik Mark Sobey Paul Sechrist Bret DiMarco 2X 2X 2X 2X Nature of Benefit Salary Severance(1) Bonus Severance(1) Equity Compensation Acceleration(2) Aggregate Healthcare Related Monthly Payment(3) TOTAL BENEFIT Salary Severance(1) Bonus Severance(1) Equity Compensation Acceleration(2) Aggregate Healthcare Related Monthly Payment(3) TOTAL BENEFIT Salary Severance(1) Bonus Severance(1) Equity Compensation Acceleration(2) Aggregate Healthcare Related Monthly Payment(3) TOTAL BENEFIT Salary Severance(1) Bonus Severance(1) Equity Compensation Acceleration(2) Aggregate Healthcare Related Monthly Payment(3) TOTAL BENEFIT Salary Severance(1) Bonus Severance(1) Equity Compensation Acceleration(2) Aggregate Healthcare Related Monthly Payment(3) TOTAL BENEFIT Termination Other than for Change of Control Change of Termination ($) Control — — — — — — — — — 1,868,807 1,868,807 — — 23,471,179 99,000 — 27,307,793 826,010 578,207 3,480,905 66,000 4,951,122 754,832 490,641 4,268,944 66,000 5,580,417 714,022 428,413 3,639,308 66,000 4,847,743 687,024 343,512 3,721,440 66,000 4,817,976 — — — — — — — — (1) Reflects salary as in effect as of December 31, 2016. Bonus severance is based on a percentage of salary as in effect as of December 31, 2016. (2) Equity Compensation Acceleration is the in-the-money value of unvested stock options, time-based restricted stock units and performance-based restricted stock units, in each case as of September 30, 2016 (the last trading date before the end of our fiscal year) at the closing stock price on that date ($110.54). The value of accelerated stock options are thus 46 Summary Compensation and Equity Tables calculated by multiplying the number of unvested shares subject to acceleration by the difference between the exercise price and the closing stock price on September 30, 2016; the value of accelerated restricted stock is calculated by multiplying the number of unvested shares subject to acceleration by the closing stock price on September 30, 2016. This assumes immediate release and vesting of the performance-based restricted stock units at the maximum, or 200% of target, achievement. The amounts reflected for Equity Compensation Acceleration do not reflect any applicable taxes, just gross proceeds. Since the table assumes a triggering event on September 30, 2016, only those stock options and restricted stock/RSU grants outstanding as of that date are included in the table. (3) Aggregate Healthcare Related Monthly Payment is a monthly payment of $2,750 in lieu of receiving company subsidized COBRA benefits, life insurance premiums and/or other welfare benefits, 36 months for the Chief Executive Officer and 24 months for the other NEOs. To assist with the transition in connection with her retirement as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Ms. Simonet agreed to remain as a special advisor to the Chief Executive Officer as a non-executive employee from February 22, 2016 through April 4, 2016, at which time she transitioned to a consultant to the Company for the period from April 5, 2016 through December 30, 2016. The Company entered into a transition services agreement with Ms. Simonet continuing her compensation through April 4, 2016 and providing for an aggregate of $100,000 (paid in equal monthly increments) for no more than 20 hours of consulting services per month from April 5, 2016 through December 30, 2016. During the term of the transition services agreement, Ms. Simonet continued to vest in her existing equity grants pursuant to the terms of the 2011 Plan. The transition services agreement included confidentiality obligations. 47 EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION The following table provides information as of October 1, 2016 about the Company’s equity compensation plans under which shares of our common stock may be issued to employees, consultants or members of our Board: Plan category Equity compensation plans approved by security holders Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders TOTAL (a) Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b) Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights(1) (c) Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) 661,177(2) $ 40.52 5,750,958(3) — 661,177 — 40.52 $ — 5,750,958 (1) These weighted average exercise prices do not reflect the shares that will be issued upon the payment of outstanding awards of RSUs. (2) This number does not include any options which may be assumed by us through mergers or acquisitions; however, we do have the authority, if necessary, to reserve additional shares of common stock under these plans to the extent necessary for assuming such options. (3) This number of shares includes 520,560 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan and 5,230,398 shares reserved for future issuance under the 2011 Plan. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS Review, Approval or Ratification of Related Person Transactions In accordance with the charter for the Audit Committee of the Board, the members of the Audit Committee, all of whom are independent directors, review and approve in advance any proposed related person transactions. Additionally, from time to time the Board may directly consider these transactions. For purposes of these procedures, the individuals and entities that are considered ‘‘related persons’’ include: • Any of our directors, nominees for director and executive officers; • Any person known to be the beneficial owner of five percent or more of our common stock (a ‘‘5% Stockholder’’); and • Any immediate family member, as defined in Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K, of a director, nominee for director, executive officer and 5% Stockholder. We will report all such material related person transactions under applicable accounting rules, federal securities laws and SEC rules and regulations. Related Person Transactions We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our executive officers and directors. Such indemnification agreements require us to indemnify these individuals to the fullest extent permitted by law. We also intend to execute these agreements with our future directors and officers. 48 REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS The Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing our accounting and financial reporting processes and audits of our financial statements, including reviewing and approving the fees for the performance of the audit by our independent auditors. As set forth in its charter, the Audit Committee acts only in an oversight capacity and relies on the work and assurances of both management, which has primary responsibilities for our financial statements and reports, as well as the independent registered public accounting firm that is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of our audited financial statements to generally accepted accounting principles. The Audit Committee met twelve (12) times either in person or by telephone during fiscal 2016. In the course of these meetings, the Audit Committee met with management, the internal auditors and our independent registered public accounting firm and reviewed the results of the internal and external audit examinations, evaluations of our internal controls and the overall quality of our financial reporting. the internal auditors and The Audit Committee believes that a candid, substantive and focused dialogue with the independent registered public accounting firm is fundamental to the Audit Committee’s oversight responsibilities. To support this belief, the Audit Committee periodically meets separately with the internal auditors and the independent auditors, without management present. In the course of its discussions in these meetings, the Audit Committee asked a number of questions intended to bring to light any areas of potential concern related to our financial reporting and internal controls. These questions include: • Are there any significant accounting judgments, estimates or adjustments made by management in preparing the financial statements that would have been made differently had themselves prepared and been responsible for the financial statements; the auditors • Based on the auditors’ experience, and their knowledge of our business, do our financial statements fairly present to investors, with clarity and completeness, our financial position and performance for the reporting period in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and SEC disclosure requirements; • Based on the auditors’ experience, and their knowledge of our business, have we implemented internal controls and internal audit procedures that are appropriate for our business. The Audit Committee approved the engagement of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2016, including the fees to be paid for their audit work, and reviewed with the internal auditors and independent registered public accounting firm their respective overall audit scope and plans. In approving Deloitte & Touche LLP, the Audit Committee considered the qualifications of Deloitte & Touche LLP and discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP their independence, including a review of the audit and non-audit services provided by them to us. The Audit Committee also discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 16, ‘‘Communications with Audit Committees’’ issued by the Public Company Oversight Board (PCAOB), and it received the written disclosures and the letter from Deloitte & Touche LLP required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company regarding Deloitte & Accounting Oversight Board Touche LLP’s communications with Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed Deloitte & Touche LLP’s independence with Deloitte & Touche LLP. the reporting, Management has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements for fiscal 2016 with the Audit Committee, including a discussion of the quality and acceptability of the reasonableness of significant financial accounting judgments and estimates and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements. In connection with this review and discussion, the Audit Committee asked a number of follow-up questions of management and the independent registered public accounting firm to help give the Audit Committee comfort in connection with its review. In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in the annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 1, 2016, for filing with the SEC. Respectively submitted by the Audit Committee Susan James, Chair Garry Rogerson Steve Skaggs 49 OTHER MATTERS We know of no other matters to be submitted to the meeting. If any other matters properly come before the meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the enclosed form Proxy to vote the shares they represent as the Board may recommend. Dated: January 26, 2017 By Order of the Board of Directors 8JAN201712031820 John R. Ambroseo President and Chief Executive Officer 50 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 (Mark One) FORM 10-K (cid:1) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Fiscal Year Ended October 1, 2016 or (cid:2) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Commission File Number: 001-33962 COHERENT, INC. Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) 5100 Patrick Henry Drive, Santa Clara, California (Address of principal executive offices) 94-1622541 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 95054 (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (408) 764-4000 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Common Stock, $0.01 par value Name of each exchange on which registered The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC Nasdaq Global Select Market Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes (cid:1) No (cid:2) Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Exchange Act’’). Yes (cid:2) No (cid:1) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes (cid:1) No (cid:2) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files. Yes (cid:1) No (cid:2) Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. (cid:2) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of ‘‘large accelerated filer’’, ‘‘accelerated filer’’ and ‘‘smaller reporting company’’ in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer (cid:1) Accelerated filer (cid:2) Smaller reporting company (cid:2) Non-accelerated filer (cid:2) (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes (cid:2) No (cid:1) As of November 28, 2016, 24,552,429 shares of common stock were outstanding. The aggregate market value of the voting shares (based on the closing price reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on April 2, 2016, of Coherent, Inc., held by nonaffiliates was approximately $1,492,502,204. For purposes of this disclosure, shares of common stock held by persons who own 5% or more of the outstanding common stock and shares of common stock held by each officer and director have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be ‘‘affiliates’’ as that term is defined under the Rules and Regulations of the Exchange Act. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily conclusive. Portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statement for the registrant’s 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of the Form 10-K to the extent stated herein. The Proxy Statement or an amended report on Form 10-K will be filed within 120 days of the registrant’s fiscal year ended October 1, 2016. DOCUMENT INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I ITEM 1. BUSINESS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PROPERTIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM 2. ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM 6. ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL 5 22 42 43 44 45 46 48 CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET ITEM 8. ITEM 9. RISK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE . ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND 72 74 74 75 78 79 81 MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS . . . . . . . . . . 81 ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM 14. PART IV ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SIGNATURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 81 83 86 2 SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS This annual report contains certain forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements relating to: (cid:127) expansion into, and financial returns from, new markets; (cid:127) maintenance and development of current and new customer relationships; (cid:127) enhancement of market position through existing or new technologies; (cid:127) timing of new product introductions and shipments; (cid:127) optimization of product mix; (cid:127) future trends in microelectronics, scientific research and government programs, OEM components and instrumentation and materials processing; (cid:127) utilization of vertical integration; (cid:127) adoption of our products or lasers generally; (cid:127) applications and processes that will use lasers, including the suitability of our products; (cid:127) capitalization on market trends; (cid:127) alignment with current and new customer demands; (cid:127) positioning in the marketplace and gains of market share; (cid:127) design and development of products, services and solutions; (cid:127) control of supply chain and partners; (cid:127) protection of intellectual property rights; (cid:127) compliance with environmental and safety regulations; (cid:127) net sales and operating results; (cid:127) capital spending; (cid:127) order volumes; (cid:127) variations in stock price; (cid:127) growth in our operations; (cid:127) market acceptance of products; (cid:127) controlling our costs; (cid:127) sufficiency and management of cash, cash equivalents and investments; (cid:127) acquisition efforts, payment methods for acquisitions and utilization of technology from our acquisitions; (cid:127) sales by geography; (cid:127) effect of legal claims; (cid:127) expectations regarding the payment of future dividends; (cid:127) effect of competition on our financial results; (cid:127) plans to renew leases when they expire; 3 (cid:127) compliance with standards; (cid:127) future dividends; (cid:127) effect of our internal controls; (cid:127) optimization of financial results; (cid:127) repatriation of funds; (cid:127) accounting for goodwill and intangible assets, inventory valuation, warranty reserves and taxes; and (cid:127) impact from our use of financial instruments. In addition, we include forward-looking statements under the ‘‘Our Strategy’’ and ‘‘Future Trends’’ headings set forth below in ‘‘Business’’ and under the ‘‘Bookings and Book-to-Bill Ratio’’ heading set forth below in ‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.’’ You can identify these and other forward-looking statements by the use of the words such as ‘‘may,’’ ‘‘will,’’ ‘‘could,’’ ‘‘would,’’ ‘‘should,’’ ‘‘expects,’’ ‘‘plans,’’ ‘‘anticipates,’’ ‘‘estimates,’’ ‘‘intends,’’ ‘‘potential,’’ ‘‘projected,’’ ‘‘continue,’’ ‘‘our observation,’’ or the negative of such terms, or other comparable terminology. Forward-looking statements also include the assumptions underlying or relating to any of the foregoing statements. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth below in ‘‘Business,’’ ‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations’’ and under the heading ‘‘Risk Factors.’’ All forward-looking statements included in this document are based on information available to us on the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to update these forward-looking statements as a result of events or circumstances or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events or non-occurrence of anticipated events, except to the extent required by law. 4 PART I ITEM 1. BUSINESS GENERAL Business Overview Our fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to September 30. Fiscal years 2016, 2015 and 2014 ended on October 1, October 3, and September 27, respectively, and are referred to in this annual report as fiscal 2016, fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014 for convenience. Fiscal years 2016 and 2014 included 52 weeks and fiscal year 2015 included 53 weeks. We are one of the world’s leading providers of lasers and laser-based technology in a broad range of scientific, commercial and industrial applications. We design, manufacture, service and market lasers and related accessories for a diverse group of customers. Since inception in 1966, we have grown through internal expansion and through strategic acquisitions of complementary businesses, technologies, intellectual property, manufacturing processes and product offerings. We are organized into two operating segments: Specialty Lasers and Systems (‘‘SLS’’) and Commercial Lasers and Components (‘‘CLC’’). This segmentation reflects the go-to-market strategies for various products and markets. While both segments deliver cost-effective photonics solutions, SLS develops and manufactures configurable, advanced performance products largely serving the microelectronics, scientific research and government programs and original equipment manufacturer (‘‘OEM’’) components and instrumentation markets. The size and complexity of many of the SLS products require service to be performed at the customer site by factory-trained field service engineers. CLC focuses on higher volume products that are offered in set configurations. The product architectures are designed for easy exchange at the point of use such that substantially all product service and repairs are based upon advanced replacement and depot (i.e., factory) repair. CLC’s primary markets include materials processing, OEM components and instrumentation and microelectronics. Income from operations is the measure of profit and loss that our chief operating decision maker (‘‘CODM’’) uses to assess performance and make decisions. Income from operations represents the sales less the cost of sales and direct operating expenses incurred within the operating segments as well as allocated expenses such as shared sales and manufacturing costs. We do not allocate to our operating segments certain operating expenses, which we manage separately at the corporate level. These unallocated costs include stock-based compensation and corporate functions (certain advanced research and development, management, finance, legal and human resources) and are included in Corporate and other. Management does not consider unallocated Corporate and other costs in its measurement of segment performance. We were originally incorporated in California on May 26, 1966 and reincorporated in Delaware on October 1, 1990. Our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market and we are a member of the Standard & Poor’s SmallCap 600 Index and the Russell 2000 Index. Additional information about Coherent, Inc. (referred to herein as the Company, we, our, or Coherent) is available on our web site at www.coherent.com. We make available, free of charge on our web site, access to our annual report on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, our current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the ‘‘Exchange Act’’), as soon as reasonably practicable after we file or furnish them electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’). Information contained on our web site is not part of this annual report or our other filings with the SEC. Any product, product name, process, or technology described in these materials is the property of Coherent. 5 RECENT EVENTS On November 7, 2016, we completed our previously announced acquisition of Rofin-Sinar Technologies Inc. (‘‘Rofin’’) pursuant to the Merger Agreement dated March 16, 2016. Rofin is one of the world’s leading developers and manufacturers of high-performance industrial laser sources and laser-based solutions and components. As a condition of the acquisition, we are required to divest ourselves of Rofin’s low power CO2 laser business based in Hull, United Kingdom, and will report this business separately as a discontinued operation until it is divested. The acquisition was an all-cash transaction at a price of $32.50 per share of Rofin common stock. The aggregate consideration paid by us to the former Rofin stockholders was approximately $904.5 million, excluding related transaction fees and expenses. We also paid $15.3 million due to the cancellation of options held by employees of Rofin. We funded the payment of the aggregate consideration with a combination of our available cash on hand and the proceeds from the Euro Term Loan described below. As a result of the acquisition of Rofin, and subsequent to fiscal 2016 year-end, we announced that in the first quarter of fiscal 2017 we will reorganize our existing two segments into two new reporting segments for the combined company, OEM Laser Systems and Industrial Lasers and Systems. Accordingly, our segment information will be restated retroactively in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. On November 7, 2016, we entered into a Credit Agreement (the ‘‘Credit Agreement’’) with Barclays Bank PLC, Bank of America, N.A., and The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. The Credit Agreement provided for a 670.0 million Euro senior secured term loan facility and a $100.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility. On November 7, 2016, the Euro Term Loan was drawn in full and its proceeds were used to finance the acquisition of Rofin and pay related fees and expenses. Also, on November 7, 2016, we used 10.0 million Euro of the capacity under the revolving credit facility for the issuance of a letter of credit. INDUSTRY BACKGROUND The word ‘‘laser’’ is an acronym for ‘‘light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation.’’ A laser emits an intense coherent beam of light with some unique and highly useful properties. Most importantly, a laser is orders of magnitude brighter than any lamp. As a result of its coherence, the beam can be focused to a very small and intense spot, useful for applications requiring very high power densities including cutting and other materials processing procedures. The laser’s high spatial resolution is also useful for microscopic imaging and inspection applications. Laser light can be monochromatic— all of the beam energy is confined to a narrow wavelength band. Some lasers can be used to create ultrafast output—a series of pulses with pulse durations as short as attoseconds (i.e., 10(cid:3)18 seconds). There are many types of lasers and one way of classifying them is by the material or medium used to create the lasing action. This can be in the form of a gas, liquid, semiconductor, solid state crystal or fiber. Lasers can also be classified by their output wavelength: ultraviolet, visible, infrared or wavelength tunable. We manufacture all of these laser types. There are also many options in terms of pulsed output versus continuous wave, pulse duration, output power, beam dimensions, etc. In fact, each application has its specific requirements in terms of laser performance. The broad technical depth at Coherent enables us to offer a diverse set of product lines characterized by lasers targeted at growth opportunities and key applications. In all cases, we aim to be the supplier of choice by offering a high-value combination of superior technical performance and high reliability. Photonics has taken its place alongside electronics as a critical enabling technology for the twenty- first century. Photonics based solutions are entrenched in a broad array of industries that include industrial automation, textile processing, microelectronics, flat panel displays and medical diagnostics, with adoption continuing in ever more diverse applications. Growth in these applications stems from two sources. First, there are many applications where the laser is displacing conventional technology because it can do the job faster, better or more economically. Second, there are new applications where 6 the laser is the enabling tool that makes the work possible (e.g., the production of sub 50 micron microvias); these lasers are used in the manufacturing of high density printed circuit boards (‘‘PCBs’’) found in the latest smart phones and tablet computers. Key laser applications include: semiconductor inspection; manufacturing of advanced PCBs; flat panel display manufacturing; solar cell production; medical and bio-instrumentation; materials processing; metals cutting and welding; industrial process and quality control; marking; imaging and printing; graphic arts and display; and, research and development. For example, ultraviolet (‘‘UV’’) lasers are enabling the move towards miniaturization, which drives innovation and growth in many markets. In addition, the advent of industrial grade ultrafast lasers continues to open up new applications for laser processing. OUR STRATEGY We strive to develop innovative and proprietary products and solutions that meet the needs of our customers and that are based on our core expertise in lasers and optical technologies. In pursuit of our strategy, we intend to: (cid:127) Leverage our technology portfolio and application engineering to lead the proliferation of photonics into broader markets—We will continue to identify opportunities in which our technology portfolio and application engineering can be used to offer innovative solutions and gain access to new markets. We plan to utilize our expertise to increase our market share in the mid to high power material processing applications. (cid:127) Optimize our leadership position in existing markets—There are a number of markets where we have historically been at the forefront of technological development and product deployment and from which we have derived a substantial portion of our revenues. We plan to optimize our financial returns from these markets. (cid:127) Maintain and develop additional strong collaborative customer and industry relationships—We believe that the Coherent brand name and reputation for product quality, technical performance and customer satisfaction will help us to further develop our loyal customer base. We plan to maintain our current customer relationships and develop new ones with customers who are industry leaders and work together with these customers to design and develop innovative product systems and solutions as they develop new technologies. (cid:127) Develop and acquire new technologies and market share—We will continue to enhance our market position through our existing technologies and develop new technologies through our internal research and development efforts, as well as through the acquisition of additional complementary technologies, intellectual property, manufacturing processes and product offerings. (cid:127) Streamline our manufacturing structure and improve our cost structure—We will focus on optimizing the mix of products that we manufacture internally and externally. We will utilize vertical integration where our internal manufacturing process is considered proprietary and seek to leverage external sources when the capabilities and cost structure are well developed and on a path towards commoditization. (cid:127) Focus on long-term improvement of adjusted EBITDA, in dollars and as a percentage of net sales—We define adjusted EBITDA as operating income adjusted for depreciation, amortization, stock-based compensation expense, major restructuring costs and certain other non-operating income and expense items. Key initiatives to reach our goals for EBITDA improvements include utilization of our Asian manufacturing locations, rationalizing our supply chain and continued leveraging of our infrastructure. 7 APPLICATIONS Our products address a broad range of applications that we group into the following markets: Microelectronics, Materials Processing, OEM Components and Instrumentation and Scientific Research and Government Programs. Microelectronics Nowhere is the trend towards miniaturization more prevalent than in the Microelectronics market where smart phones, tablets, personal computers (‘‘PC’s’’), televisions (‘‘TV’s’’) and ‘‘wearables’’ are driving advances in displays, integrated circuits and PCBs. In response to market demands and expectations, semiconductor and device manufacturers are continually seeking to improve their process and design technologies in order to manufacture smaller, more powerful and more reliable devices at lower cost. New laser applications and new laser technologies are a key element in delivering higher resolution and higher precision at lower manufacturing cost. We support three major markets in the microelectronics industry: (1) flat panel display (‘‘FPD’’) manufacturing, (2) advanced packaging and interconnects (‘‘API’’) and (3) semiconductor front-end (‘‘SEMI’’). Microelectronics—flat panel display manufacturing The high-volume consumer market is driving the production of FPDs in applications such as mobile phones, tablets, laptop computers, TVs and wearables. There are several types of established and emerging displays based on quite different technologies, including liquid crystal (‘‘LCD’’) and organic light emitting diodes (‘‘OLED’’). Each of these technologies utilize laser applications due to the fact that lasers enable higher process speed, better yield, improved battery life, lower cost and/or superior display brightness and resolution. Several display types require a high-density pattern of silicon thin film transistors (‘‘TFTs’’). If this silicon is polycrystalline as opposed to amorphous, the display performance is greatly enhanced. In the past, these polysilicon layers could only be produced on expensive special glass at high temperatures. However, excimer-based processes, such as excimer laser annealing (‘‘ELA’’) have allowed high-volume production of low-temperature polysilicon (‘‘LTPS’’) on conventional glass substrates as well as flexible displays on plastic substrates. Our excimer lasers provide a unique solution for LTPS because they are the only industrial-grade excimer lasers optimized for this application. The current state-of-the-art product for this application is our excimer VYPER laser, which delivers over 1000W of power, enabling customers to scale to current Generation 5.5 & 6 substrates all the way up to Generation 8 sizes. These systems are integral to the manufacturing process on all leading LTPS-based smart phone displays, with the highest commercially available pixel densities of greater than 300 pixels per inch (ppi), with the current trends going to even higher ppi (>500 ppi) for high end smart phones, and hold the potential for deployment in tablet display and OLED TV manufacturing. Excimer based LTPS is also enabling a new generation of flexible OLED displays which have already seen some implementation in leading smart phones and wearables and are poised for rapid growth in the near future. Our AVIA, Rapid, Talisker, Monaco and DIAMOND CO2 and CO lasers are also used in other production processes for FPDs. These processes include drilling, cutting, patterning, marking and yield improvement. Microelectronics—advanced packaging and interconnects After a wafer is patterned, there are then a host of other processes, referred to as back-end processing, which finally result in a packaged encapsulated silicon chip. Ultimately, these chips are then assembled into finished products. The advent of high-speed logic and high-memory content devices has 8 caused chip manufacturers to look for alternative technologies to improve performance and lower process costs. In terms of materials, this search includes new types of materials, such as low-k and thinner silicon. Our AVIA, Rapid, Talisker, Monaco and Matrix lasers provide economical methods of cutting and scribing these wafers while delivering higher yields than traditional mechanical methods. There are similar trends in chip packaging and PCB manufacturing requiring more compact packaging and denser interconnects. In many cases, lasers present enabling technologies. For instance, lasers are now the only economically practical method for drilling microvias in chip substrates and in both rigid and flexible PCBs. These microvias are tiny interconnects that are essential for enabling high-density circuitry commonly used in smart phones, tablets and advanced computing systems. Our DIAMOND CO2 and AVIA diode pumped solid state (‘‘DPSS’’) lasers are the lasers of choice in this application. The ability of these lasers to operate at very high repetition rates translates into faster drilling speeds and increased throughput in microvia processing applications. In addition, multi-layer circuit boards require more flexible production methods than conventional printing technologies can offer, which has led to widespread adoption of laser direct imaging (‘‘LDI’’). Our Paladin laser is used for this application. Lasers have also become a valuable tool in high-brightness (‘‘HB’’) light-emitting diode (‘‘LED’’) manufacturing, improving LED performance and yield. LEDs have widespread adoption as the light source in all categories of LCD displays, from phones all the way to full size TVs and moving into general lighting. Our lasers are used in back-end processing of HB-LEDs. Microelectronics—semiconductor front-end The term ‘‘front-end’’ refers to the production of semiconductor devices which occurs prior to packaging. As semiconductor device geometries decrease in size, devices become increasingly susceptible to smaller defects during each phase of the manufacturing process and these defects can negatively impact yield. One of the semiconductor industry’s responses to the increasing vulnerability of semiconductor devices to smaller defects has been to use defect detection and inspection techniques that are closely linked to the manufacturing process. For example, automated laser-based inspection systems are now used to detect and locate defects as small as 0.01 micron, which may not be observable by conventional optical microscopes. Detecting the presence of defects is only the first step in preventing their recurrence. After detection, defects must be examined in order to identify their size, shape and the process step in which the defect occurred. This examination is called defect classification. Identification of the sources of defects in the lengthy and complex semiconductor manufacturing process has become essential for maintaining high yield production. Semiconductor manufacturing has become an around-the-clock operation and it is important for products used for inspection, measurement and testing to be reliable and to have long lifetimes. Our Azure, Paladin and Excimer lasers are used to detect and characterize defects in semiconductor chips. Materials processing Lasers are widely accepted today in many important industrial manufacturing applications including cutting, welding, joining, drilling, perforating, and marking of metals and nonmetals. We supply high-power lasers for metal processing and low-to-medium power lasers for laser marking, nonmetals processing and precision micromachining. Our high power industrial laser systems are used for cutting, welding, cladding and hardening of metals, as well as other materials processing applications. 9 Our Semiconductor business provides higher power arrays with powers in excess of 50 kilowatts through proprietary cooling and stacking technology. This unique technology provides the engine for both our Highlight direct diode systems as well as our Highlight multi-kilowatt class fiber lasers. Our differentiated fiber laser design offers our customers a higher level of integration and additional options for product serviceability. Our fiber lasers are used for metal cutting, cladding, welding and additive manufacturing applications. Complementing our high power solid state lasers is our industry leading DIAMOND E1000 CO2 laser. This laser remains in high demand due to its high power, small size and completely sealed design—all ideal for materials processing. With the broadest product portfolio in the laser industry, we offer solutions for almost any application on any material to our customers. Combining the high power Direct Diode, Fiber and CO2 products with our META flatbed cutting tool provides a strong, compelling four-pronged approach to meeting the needs of our diverse high power materials processing customers. We are vertically integrated with world class diode and active fiber manufacturing, which makes us very well positioned to succeed in both the near and long term in the high power fiber laser market. We also participate in the low to medium power area, including such applications as the cutting, drilling and joining of a host of materials using our DIAMOND CO and CO2 lasers; Highlight fiber array product (‘‘FAP’’) semiconductor lasers in OEM opportunities and direct end user applications with META cutting tools; applications including cutting, perforating and scoring of paper, thin metals and packaging materials; and various cutting and patterning applications in the textile, wood and sign industries. In the specific area of textiles and clothing, our DIAMOND lasers service older applications, such as cutting complex shapes in leather for footwear, as well as newer applications such as creating detailed fade patterns on designer denims. Laser marking and coding are generally considered part of the precision materials processing applications market for which we remain a leading supplier. The optimum choice of laser depends on the material being marked, whether it is a surface mark (engraved) or a sub-surface mark, and the specific economics of the application. Our DIAMOND J, C and GEM Series of CO2 lasers provide many systems manufacturers with a reliable cost effective source for marking and engraving on non-metals. In addition, our Matrix and Helios product lines of reliable, compact and low-cost DPSS lasers provide an ideal solution for marking of other materials in high volume manufacturing. With our large portfolio of Ultrafast laser technology, we serve customers with a variety of laser micromachining solutions, including our Integrated Optics Systems group which will develop sub systems and new applications in the fast growing micro materials processing market. OEM components and instrumentation Instrumentation is one of our more mature commercial applications. Representative applications within this market include bio-instrumentation, medical OEMs, graphic arts and display and machine vision. We also support the laser-based instrumentation market with a range of laser-related components, including diode lasers for optical pumping. Our OEM component business includes sales to other, less integrated laser manufacturers participating in OEM markets such as materials processing, scientific, and medical. Bio-instrumentation Bio-instrumentation applications for lasers include bio-agent detection for point source and standoff detection of pathogens or other bio-toxins; confocal microscopy for biological imaging that allows researchers and clinicians to visualize cellular and subcellular structures and processes with an incredible amount of detail; DNA sequencing that provides automation and data acquisition rates that 10 would be impossible by any other method; drug discovery—genomic and proteomic analyses that enable drug discovery to proceed at very high throughput rates; and flow cytometry for analyzing single cells or populations of cells in a heterogeneous mixture, including blood samples. Our OBIS, Flare, Galaxy, Sapphire, BioRay and Genesis lasers are used in several bio-instrumentation applications. Medical Therapy We sell a variety of components and lasers to medical laser companies in end-user applications such as ophthalmology, aesthetic, surgical, therapeutic and dentistry. Our DIAMOND series CO2 lasers are widely used in ophthalmic, aesthetic and surgical markets. We have a leading position in Lasik and photorefractive keratectomy surgery methods with our ExciStar XS excimer laser platform. We also provide ultrafast lasers for use in cataract surgery, a growing applications space. The unique ability of our optically pumped semiconductor lasers (‘‘OPSL’’) technology to match a wavelength to an application has led to the development of a high-power yellow (577nm) laser for the treatment of eye related diseases, such as Age Related Macular Degeneration and retinal diseases associated with diabetes. The 577nm wavelength was designed to match the peak in absorption of oxygenated hemoglobin thereby allowing treatment to occur at a lower power level, and thus reducing stress and heat-load placed on the eye with traditional green-based (530nm) solid state lasers. Other applications where our OBIS, Genesis and Sapphire series of lasers are used include the retinal scanning market in diagnostic imaging systems as well as new ground breaking in-vivo imaging. Scientific research and government programs We are widely recognized as a technology innovator and the scientific market has historically provided an ideal ‘‘test market’’ for our leading-edge innovations. These have included ultrafast lasers, DPSS lasers, continuous-wave (‘‘CW’’) systems, excimer gas lasers and water-cooled ion gas lasers. Our portfolio of lasers that address the scientific research market is broad and includes our Chameleon, COMPexPro, Evolution, Fidelity, Legend, Libra, MBD, MBR, Monaco, Vitara, Mephisto, Mira and Verdi lasers. Many of the innovations and products pioneered in the scientific marketplace have become commercial successes for both our OEM customers and us. We have a large installed base of scientific lasers which are used in a wide range of applications spanning virtually every branch of science and engineering. These applications include biology and life science, engineering, physical chemistry and physics. Most of these applications require the use of ultrafast lasers that enable the generation of pulses short enough to be measured in femto- or attoseconds (10(cid:3)15 to 10(cid:3)18 seconds). Because of these very short pulse durations, ultrafast lasers enable the study of fundamental physical and chemical processes with temporal resolution unachievable with any other tool. These lasers also deliver very high peak power and large bandwidths, which can be used to generate many exotic effects. Some of these are now finding their way into mainstream applications, such as microscopy or materials processing. The use of ultrafast lasers such as the Chameleon in microscopy is now a common occurrence in bio-imaging labs, and they have become a crucial tool in modern brain research. We recently released a new product called the Chameleon Discovery targeted to this market. FUTURE TRENDS Microelectronics Lasers are widely used in mass production microelectronics applications largely because they enable entirely new application capabilities that cannot be realized by any other known means. These laser-based fabrication and testing methods provide a level of precision, typically on a micrometer and nanometer level, that are unique, faster, are touch free, deliver superior end products, increase yields, and/or cut production costs. We anticipate this trend to continue, driven primarily by the increasing 11 sophistication and miniaturization of consumer electronic goods and their convergence via the internet, resulting in increasing demand for better displays, more bandwidth and memory, and all packaged into devices which are lighter, thinner and consume less power. Although this market follows the macro- economic trends and carries inherent risks, we believe that we are well positioned to continue to capitalize on the current market trends and that we will see continued increased adoption of our solid- state, CO2, fiber, direct diode and excimer lasers, as all these lasers enable entirely new applications, performance improvements and reduced process costs. Excimer laser based LTPS is a key technology for producing high resolution OLED displays in general and flexible OLED displays in particular. We believe we are well positioned to take advantage of the rapid growth that is projected for OLED displays in smart phones and other mobile devices over the next several years with our Vyper and LineBeam systems. CO2, Avia, Matrix, Rapid, Talisker, Helios and direct diode lasers all seem aligned with the need for related FPD touch panel, film cutting, light guide technology, repair, frit welding, as well as sapphire and glass-cutting applications. The trend for thinner and lighter devices is impacting the glass substrates used in today’s mobile devices requiring thinner glass with higher degrees of mechanical strength and scratch resistance. This trend also includes use of sapphire instead of glass. Mechanical means of cutting these glass and sapphire pieces are no longer adequate to meet future requirements and we expect lasers to play an increased role. Our CO, CO2, Monaco and Rapid lasers are well positioned to take advantage of this trend. Semiconductor devices look set to continue Moore’s Law, shrinking device geometries for at least another decade, as well as expanding vertically into new 3D structures. As a result we believe our many UV laser sources (such as Azure, Paladin, Avia, Rapid, ExiStar and Matrix) will continue to find increasing adoption, since their unique optical properties align well with the process demands of a nanometer scale world. The same lasers plus Monaco, Rapid FX, CO and CO2 are also widely adopted for back end Advanced Packaging and Interconnect (API) applications. With dimension roadmaps showing a decade of dimension shrink on PCBs, interconnects, Silicon & LED scribe widths and wafer thickness, we believe that our portfolio of lasers aligns well with these demands as well as new processes that seem likely to be enabled by our lasers, to meet the increasing demands and decreasing tolerances of these markets. Materials processing The market for low to medium power CO2, solid state and semiconductor lasers used in industrial materials processing is very diverse. New product introductions such as our Diamond J-series CO2 and CO lasers continue to support our growth in this area. These lasers represent a cost-effective manufacturing solution for cutting, joining, marking and engraving of non-metal materials including marking/coding, flat bed cutting, engraving, as well as the production of capital equipment for apparel and leather goods manufacturing. The market for kW class fiber lasers has seen strong growth in recent years, replacing legacy multi-kW CO2 lasers in metal cutting and other applications. This trend will likely continue into the future. The favorable cost of ownership of high power diode and fiber lasers has expanded their use in a number of metal processing applications in addition to cutting. They have seen adoption in welding and brazing applications as well as newer growth areas in additive manufacturing like cladding and 3D printing. We believe we are well positioned to benefit from these large and growing markets with our line of kW fiber and diode lasers. 12 We have developed an expanded portfolio of lasers with a broad spectrum of wavelengths and power levels, enabling optimum solutions for virtually every metal and non-metal material type. At the same time, the higher reliability of these products has lowered the cost of ownership. OEM components and instrumentation The bio instrumentation market is on a steady path in the most important areas: microscopy, flow cytometry and DNA sequencing, which all are enjoying solid research funding on a worldwide basis with some local variations. In this field, our OPSL technology gives us differentiated products at a number of important wavelengths. This advantage coupled with strong focus on meeting our customers’ demands for more compact and cost effective sources has made us very successful and we expect that to continue. Our OPSL technology resulted in the first truly continuous wave solid-state UV laser which enables the use of UV in a clinical as well as a research environment. In the medical therapeutic area, we see solid business with several opportunities for growth. We supply excimer lasers used in refractive eye surgery and are actively involved in further developments in laser vision correction including the use of ultrafast lasers in applications such as laser cataract surgery where higher precision and use of advanced implants enable better and more reliable patient outcomes. Laser cataract surgery is still at a relatively early stage of adoption and is expected to see continued growth over the next several years. We also have opportunities in dental procedures for both hard and soft tissue ablation, with greatly improved patient comfort and outcome. In the area of photocoagulation, our Genesis OPSL yellow lasers are being used as the wavelength is particularly suitable for the treatment of blood vessels. In aesthetic laser procedures, we are an OEM supplier of CO2 and semiconductor lasers to the major manufacturers of equipment used in the latest procedures in dermatology and hair removal. Scientific research and government programs Worldwide scientific funding seems very stable overall, with some regions growing and others just holding their current level. Bright spots include the strong push in neuroscience to better understand how the brain functions. Lasers play a very important role in imaging brain structure as well as tracking activity in animal brains using techniques such as optogenetics. We believe that our current and upcoming products are well positioned to take advantage of this exciting opportunity. In physics and chemistry applications, our recent product introductions of high performance and industrially hardened ultrafast products have been very well received. While this is a very competitive market, we expect that our new products will position us for growth. 13 MARKET APPLICATIONS We design, manufacture and market lasers, laser tools, precision optics and related accessories for a diverse group of customers. The following table lists our major markets and the Coherent technologies serving these markets.* Market Application Technology Microelectronics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Flat panel display Advanced packaging and interconnects Semiconductor front-end Materials processing . . . . . . . . . . . Metal cutting, drilling, joining, cladding, surface treatment and additive manufacturing Laser marking and coding Non-metal cutting, drilling OEM components and instrumentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bio-Instrumentation Graphic arts and display Medical therapy (OEM) Scientific research and government programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . All scientific applications CO, CO2 DPSS Excimer Ultrafast Semiconductor CO, CO2 DPSS Excimer Ultrafast CO2 DPSS OPSL Excimer Ion CO2 Fiber Semiconductor Laser Machine Tools Ultrafast CO2 DPSS Ultrafast CO, CO2 DPSS Ultrafast Excimer Semiconductor Laser Machine Tools DPSS OPSL Semiconductor OPSL CO2 CO, CO2 DPSS Ultrafast Excimer OPSL Semiconductor DPSS Excimer OPSL Ultrafast * Coherent sells its laser measurement and control products into a number of these applications. 14 In addition to products we provide, we invest routinely in the core technologies needed to create substantial differentiation for our products in the marketplace. Our semiconductor, crystal, fiber and large form factor optics facilities all maintain an external customer base providing value-added solutions. We direct significant engineering efforts to produce unique solutions targeted for internal consumption. These investments, once integrated into our broader product portfolio, provide our customers with uniquely differentiated solutions and the opportunity to substantially enhance the performance, reliability and capability of the products we offer. TECHNOLOGIES Diode-pumped solid-state lasers DPSS lasers use semiconductor lasers to pump a crystal to produce a laser beam. By changing the energy, optical components and the types of crystals used in the laser, different wavelengths and types of laser light can be produced. The efficiency, reliability, longevity and relatively low cost of DPSS lasers make them ideally suited for a wide range of OEM and end-user applications, particularly those requiring 24-hour operations. Our DPSS systems are compact and self-contained sealed units. Unlike conventional tools and other lasers, our DPSS lasers require minimal maintenance since they do not have internal controls or components that require adjusting and cleaning to maintain consistency. They are also less affected by environmental changes in temperature and humidity, which can alter alignment and inhibit performance in many systems. We manufacture a variety of types of DPSS lasers for different applications including semiconductor inspection; advanced packaging and interconnects; laser pumping; spectroscopy; bio-agent detection; DNA sequencing; drug discovery; flow cytometry; forensics; computer-to-plate printing; entertainment lighting (display); medical; rapid prototyping and marking, welding, engraving, cutting and drilling. Fiber lasers Fiber lasers use semiconductor lasers to pump a doped optical fiber to produce a laser beam. The unique features of a fiber laser make them suitable for producing high power, continuous wave laser beams. We introduced a multi kilowatt fiber laser platform in fiscal 2015. Our fiber laser design has several unique features including a modular design for improved serviceability and diode bar based pumping. Due to packaging efficiency, diode bars reduce the overall cost of a fiber laser. Some of the most critical components inside a fiber laser include the gain fiber itself and the diodes providing the pump power. We are well positioned as a fiber laser supplier since we are vertically integrated with respect to these key technologies; we use diode bars and fiber manufactured in-house. We plan to continue to drive cost reduction in our diode laser pumps and demonstrate the scalability of the platform by moving up the power scale into the multi kilowatt regime. This platform will address the large growing high power metal cutting and joining market. Gas lasers (CO, CO2, Excimer, Ion) The breadth of our gas laser portfolio is industry leading, encompassing CO, CO2, excimer and ion laser technologies. Gas lasers derive their name from the use of one or more gases as a lasing medium. They collectively span an extremely diverse and useful emission range, from the very deep ultraviolet to the far infrared. This diverse range of available wavelengths, coupled with high optical output power, and an abundance of other attractive characteristics, makes gas lasers extremely useful and popular for a variety of microelectronics, scientific, medical therapeutic and materials processing applications. 15 Optically Pumped Semiconductor Lasers (‘‘OPSL’’) Our OPSL platform is a surface emitting semiconductor laser that is energized or pumped by a semiconductor laser. The use of optical pumping circumvents inherent power scaling limitations of electrically pumped lasers, enabling very high powered devices. A wide range of wavelengths can be achieved by varying the semiconductor materials used in the device and changing the frequency of the laser beam using techniques common in solid state lasers. The platform leverages high reliability technologies developed for telecommunications and produces a compact, rugged, high power, single-mode laser. Our OPSL products are well suited to a wide range of applications, including the bio-instrumentation, medical therapeutics and graphic arts and display markets. We continue to expand our ultraviolet version of the OPSL platform called the Genesis, which was developed for the bio-instrumentation market. Semiconductor lasers High power edge emitting semiconductor diode lasers use the same principles as widely-used CD and DVD lasers, but produce significantly higher power levels. The advantages of this type of laser include smaller size, longer life, enhanced reliability and greater efficiency. We manufacture a wide range of discrete semiconductor laser products with wavelengths ranging from 650nm to over 1000nm and output powers ranging from 1W to over 100W, with highly integrated products in the kW range. These products are available in a variety of industry standard form factors including the following: bare die, packaged and fiber coupled single emitters and bars, monolithic stacks and fully integrated modules with microprocessor controlled units that contain power supplies and active coolers. Our semiconductor lasers are used internally as the pump lasers in DPSS, fiber and OPSL products that are manufactured by us, as well as a wide variety of external medical, OEM, military and industrial applications, including aesthetic (hair removal, cosmetic dentistry), graphic arts, counter measures, rangefinders, target designators, cladding, hardening and plastic welding. Ultrafast (‘‘UF’’) Lasers Ultrafast lasers are lasers generating light pulses with durations of a few femtoseconds (10(cid:3)15 seconds) to a few tens of picoseconds (10(cid:3)11 seconds). These types of lasers are used for medical, advanced microelectronics and materials processing applications as well as scientific research. UF laser oscillators generate a train of pulses at 50-100 MHz, with peak powers of tens of kilowatts, and UF laser amplifiers generate pulses at 1-2000 kHz, with peak powers up to several Terawatts. The extremely short duration of UF laser pulses enables temporally resolving fast events like the dynamics of atoms or electrons. In addition, the high peak power enables so-called non-linear effects where several photons can be absorbed by a molecule at the same time. This type of process enables applications like multi-photon excitation microscopy or UF ablation of materials with high precision and minimal thermal damage. The use of our ultrafast lasers in applications outside science has been growing rapidly over the last several years, particularly in microelectronics and materials processing applications. SALES AND MARKETING We primarily market our products in the United States through a direct sales force. We sell internationally through direct sales personnel located in Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, China, South Korea, Taiwan and the United Kingdom, as well as through independent representatives in certain jurisdictions around the world. Our foreign sales are made principally to customers in South Korea, Japan, Germany, China and other European and Asia-Pacific countries. 16 Foreign sales accounted for 76% of our net sales in fiscal 2016, 73% of our net sales in fiscal 2015 and 74% of our net sales in fiscal 2014. Sales made to independent representatives and distributors are generally priced in U.S. dollars. A large portion of foreign sales that we make directly to customers are priced in local currencies and are therefore subject to currency exchange fluctuations. Foreign sales are also subject to other normal risks of foreign operations such as protective tariffs, export and import controls and political instability. We had one customer, Advanced Process Systems Corporation, who contributed more than 10% of revenue during fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014. We had another major customer, Japanese Steel Works, Ltd., who contributed more than 10% of revenue during fiscal 2016. To support our sales efforts we maintain and continue to invest in a number of applications centers around the world, where our applications experts work closely with customers on developing laser processes to meet their manufacturing needs. The applications span a wide range, but are mostly centered around the materials processing and microelectronics markets. Locations include several facilities in the US, Europe and Asia. We maintain customer support and field service staff in major markets within the United States, Europe, Japan, China, South Korea, Taiwan and other Asia-Pacific countries. This organization works closely with customers, customer groups and independent representatives in servicing equipment, training customers to use our products and exploring additional applications of our technologies. We typically provide parts and service warranties on our lasers, laser-based systems, optical and laser components and related accessories and services. Warranties on some of our products and services may be shorter or longer than one year. Warranty reserves, as reflected on our consolidated balance sheets, have generally been sufficient to cover product warranty repair and replacement costs. The weighted average warranty period covered is approximately 15 months. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT We are constantly developing and introducing new products as well as improving and refining existing products to better serve the markets we participate in. Our development efforts are focused on designing and developing products, services and solutions that anticipate customers’ changing needs and emerging technological trends. Our efforts are also focused on identifying the areas where we believe we can make valuable contributions. Research and development expenditures for fiscal 2016 were $81.8 million, or 9.5% of net sales compared to $81.5 million, or 10.2% of net sales for fiscal 2015 and $79.1 million, or 10.0% of net sales for fiscal 2014. We work closely with customers, both individually and through our sponsored seminars, to develop products to meet customer application and performance needs. In addition, we are working with leading research and educational institutions to develop new photonics based solutions. MANUFACTURING Strategies One of our core manufacturing strategies is to tightly control our supply of key parts, components, sub-assemblies and outsourcing partners. We primarily utilize vertical integration when we have proprietary internal capabilities that are not cost-effectively available from external sources. We believe this is essential to maintain high quality products and enable rapid development and deployment of new products and technologies. We provide customers with 24-hour technical expertise and quality that is International Organization for Standardization (‘‘ISO’’) certified at our principal manufacturing sites. Committed to quality and customer satisfaction, we design and produce many of our own components and sub-assemblies in order to retain quality and performance control. We have also 17 outsourced certain components, sub-assemblies and finished goods where we can maintain our high quality standards while improving our cost structure. As part of our strategy to increase our market share and customer support in Asia as well as our continuing efforts to manage costs, we have transferred the production of additional products into both of our Singapore and Malaysia factories. In addition, we expanded our repair activities in our China and South Korea operations and also opened a tube refurbishment manufacturing site in South Korea. This has allowed us to reduce service response time and inventories, providing benefits to us and to our customers. We have also established an International Procurement Office in Singapore and have been increasing our sourcing of materials from Asia to reduce material costs on a global basis. In fiscal 2015, we increased our vertical integration capabilities with the asset acquisition of the Tinsley Optics business from L-3 Communications Corporation. We have designed and implemented proprietary manufacturing tools, equipment and techniques in an effort to provide products that differentiate us from our competitors. These proprietary manufacturing techniques are utilized in a number of our product lines including our gas laser production, crystal growth, beam alignment as well as the wafer growth for our semiconductor and optically pumped semiconductor laser product family. Raw materials or sub-components required in the manufacturing process are generally available from several sources. However, we currently purchase several key components and materials, including exotic materials, crystals and optics, used in the manufacture of our products from sole source or limited source suppliers. We also purchase assemblies and turnkey solutions from contract manufacturers based on our proprietary designs. We rely on our own production and design capability to manufacture and specify certain strategic components, crystals, fibers, semiconductor lasers, lasers and laser based systems. For a discussion of the importance to our business of, and the risks attendant to sourcing, see ‘‘Risk Factors’’ in item 1A—‘‘We depend on sole source or limited source suppliers, both internal and external, for some of our key components and materials, including exotic materials, certain cutting-edge optics and crystals, in our products, which make us susceptible to supply shortages or price fluctuations that could adversely affect our business.’’ Operations Our products are manufactured at our sites in Santa Clara, Sunnyvale and Richmond, California; Wilsonville, Oregon; East Hanover, New Jersey; Bloomfield, Connecticut; Salem, New Hampshire; L¨ubeck, Germany; G¨ottingen, Germany; Kaiserslautern, Germany; Glasgow, Scotland; YongIn-Si, South Korea; Kallang Sector, Singapore; and Penang, Malaysia. In addition, we also use contract manufacturers for the production of certain assemblies and turnkey solutions. Our ion gas lasers, a portion of our DPSS lasers that are used in microelectronics, scientific research and materials processing applications, semiconductor lasers, OPS lasers, fiber lasers and ultrafast scientific lasers are manufactured at our Santa Clara, California site. Our laser diode module products, laser instrumentation products, test and measurement equipment products are manufactured in Wilsonville, Oregon. We manufacture exotic crystals in East Hanover, New Jersey and both active and passive fibers are manufactured in our Salem, New Hampshire facility. Our CO2 and CO gas lasers are manufactured in Bloomfield, Connecticut. We manufacture our LMT products in Bloomfield, Connecticut and Singapore. We manufacture a portion of our DPSS lasers used in microelectronics and OEM components and instrumentation applications in L¨ubeck, Germany. We manufacture a portion of our DPSS lasers used in microelectronics, OEM components and instrumentation and materials processing applications in Kaiserslautern, Germany. Our excimer gas laser products are manufactured in G¨ottingen, Germany. We refurbish excimer tubes at our manufacturing site in South Korea. We manufacture the fiber-based lasers and a portion of our DPSS lasers used in microelectronics and 18 scientific research applications in Glasgow, Scotland. Our facility in Sunnyvale, California grows the aluminum-free materials that are incorporated into our semiconductor lasers. Our facility in Richmond, California manufactures large form factor optics for our Linebeam excimer laser annealing systems. We have transferred several products and subassemblies for manufacture at our Singapore and Malaysia facilities and are continuing to transfer additional product manufacturing to Singapore and Malaysia as part of our worldwide manufacturing cost reduction strategy. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY We rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws and restrictions on disclosure to protect our intellectual property rights. As of October 1, 2016, we held approximately 565 U.S. and foreign patents, which expire from 2016 through 2032 (depending on the payment of maintenance fees) and we have approximately 133 additional pending patent applications that have been filed. The issued patents cover various products in all of the major markets that we serve. For a discussion of the importance to our business of, and the risks attendant to intellectual property rights, see ‘‘Risk Factors’’ in Item 1A—‘‘We may not be able to protect our proprietary technology which could adversely affect our competitive advantage’’ and ‘‘We may, in the future, be subject to claims or litigation from third parties, for claims of infringement of their proprietary rights or to determine the scope and validity of our proprietary rights or the proprietary rights of competitors or other rights holders. These claims could result in costly litigation and the diversion of our technical and management personnel. Adverse resolution of litigation may harm our operating results or financial condition.’’ COMPETITION Competition in the various photonics markets in which we provide products is very intense. We compete against a number of large public and private companies including CVI Melles Griot, Novanta Inc., IPG Photonics Corporation, Lumentum Holdings Inc., MKS Instruments, Inc., and Trumpf GmbH, as well as other smaller companies. We compete globally based on our broad product offering, reliability, cost, and performance advantages for the widest range of commercial and scientific research applications. Other considerations by our customers include warranty, global service and support and distribution. BACKLOG At fiscal 2016 year-end, our backlog of orders scheduled for shipment (within one year) was $605.3 million compared to $309.5 million at fiscal 2015 year-end. By segment, backlog for SLS was $515.2 million and $219.3 million, respectively, at fiscal 2016 and 2015 year-ends. Backlog for CLC was $90.1 million and $90.2 million, respectively, at fiscal 2016 and 2015 year-ends. The increase in SLS backlog from fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2016 year-end is primarily due to timing of large excimer laser annealing system orders, net of shipments, for the flat panel display market, which explains the increase in overall company backlog as well. Orders used to compute backlog are generally cancelable and, depending on the notice period, are subject to rescheduling by our customers without substantial penalties. Historically, we have not experienced a significant rate of cancellation or rescheduling, though we cannot guarantee that the rate of cancellations or rescheduling will not increase in the future. SEASONALITY We have historically experienced decreased revenue in the first fiscal quarter compared to other quarters in our fiscal year due to the impact of time off and business closures at our facilities and those of many of our customers due to year-end holidays. For example over the past 10 years we have noted, 19 excluding certain recovery years, our first fiscal quarter revenues have ranged 2%-12% below the fourth quarter of the prior fiscal years. This historical pattern should not be considered a reliable indicator of the Company’s future net sales or financial performance. EMPLOYEES As of fiscal 2016 year-end, we had 2,787 employees. Approximately 396 of our employees are involved in research and development; 1,786 of our employees are involved in operations, manufacturing, service and quality assurance; and 605 of our employees are involved in sales, order administration, marketing, finance, information technology, general management and other administrative functions. Our success will depend in large part upon our ability to attract and retain employees. We face competition in this regard from other companies, research and academic institutions, government entities and other organizations. We consider our relations with our employees to be good. ACQUISITIONS On November 7, 2016, we acquired Rofin, one of the world’s leading developers and manufacturers of high-performance industrial laser sources and laser-based solutions and components. See ‘‘Recent Developments’’ for further discussion of the acquisition and the Credit Agreement. In July 2015, we acquired certain assets of Raydiance, Inc. (‘‘Raydiance’’) for approximately $5.0 million, excluding transaction costs. Raydiance manufactured complete tools and lasers for ultrafast processing systems and subsystems in the precision micromachining processing market. The Raydiance assets have been included in our Specialty Lasers and Systems segment. In July 2015, we acquired the assets and certain liabilities of the Tinsley Optics (‘‘Tinsley’’) business from L-3 Communications Corporation for approximately $4.3 million, excluding transaction costs. Tinsley is a specialized manufacturer of high precision optical components and subsystems sold primarily in the aerospace and defense industry. Tinsley manufactures the large form factor optics for our excimer laser annealing systems. The Tinsley assets have been included in our Specialty Lasers and Systems segment. Please refer to ‘‘Note 3. Business Combinations’’ of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 15 of this annual report for further discussion of recent acquisitions completed. GOVERNMENT REGULATION Environmental regulation Our operations are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign environmental regulations relating to the use, storage, handling and disposal of regulated materials, chemicals, various radioactive materials and certain waste products. In the United States, we are subject to the federal regulation and control of the Environmental Protection Agency. Comparable authorities are involved in other countries. Such rules are subject to change by the governing agency and we monitor those changes closely. We expect all operations to meet the legal and regulatory environmental requirements and believe that compliance with those regulations will not have a material adverse effect on our capital expenditures, earnings and competitive and financial position. Although we believe that our safety procedures for using, handling, storing and disposing of such materials comply with the standards required by federal and state laws and regulations, we cannot completely eliminate the risk of accidental contamination or injury from these materials. In the event of such an accident involving such materials, we could be liable for damages and such liability could exceed the amount of our liability insurance coverage and the resources of our business. 20 We may face the potential of increasing complexity in our product designs and procurement operations due to the evolving nature of product compliance standards. Those standards may impact the material composition of our products entering specific markets. Such regulations went into effect in the European Union (‘‘EU’’) in 2006, (The Restriction of Hazardous Substances Directive (RoHS)) and 2007 (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)), and China in 2007 (Management Methods for Controlling Pollution Caused by Electronic Information Products Regulation (China-RoHS)), and the US Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. Furthermore, we could face costs and liabilities in connection with product take-back legislation. Beginning in 2006, the EU Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive made producers of electrical goods financially responsible for specified collection, recycling, treatment and disposal of past and future covered products. Similar laws are now pending in various jurisdictions around the world, including the United States. Environmental liabilities Our operations are subject to various laws and regulations governing the environment, including the discharge of pollutants and the management and disposal of hazardous substances. As a result of our historic as well as on-going operations, we could incur substantial costs, including remediation costs. The costs under environmental laws and the timing of these costs are difficult to predict. Our accruals for such costs and liabilities may not be adequate because the estimates on which the accruals are based depend on a number of factors including the nature of the matter, the complexity of the site, site geology, the nature and extent of contamination, the type of remedy, the outcome of discussions with regulatory agencies and other Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs) at multi-party sites and the number and financial viability of other PRPs. We further discuss the impact of environmental regulation under ‘‘Risk Factors’’ in Item 1A— ‘‘Compliance or the failure to comply with current and future environmental regulations could cause us significant expense.’’ SEGMENT INFORMATION We are organized into two operating segments: SLS and CLC. This segmentation reflects the go-to-market strategies for various products and markets. While both segments deliver cost-effective photonics solutions, SLS develops and manufactures configurable, advanced performance products largely serving the microelectronics, scientific research and government programs and OEM components and instrumentation markets. The size and complexity of many of the SLS products require service to be performed at the customer site by factory-trained field service engineers. CLC focuses on higher volume products that are offered in set configurations. The product architectures are designed for easy exchange at the point of use such that substantially all product service and repairs are based upon advanced replacement and depot (i.e., factory) repair. CLC’s primary markets include materials processing, OEM components and instrumentation and microelectronics. We have identified SLS and CLC as operating segments for which discrete financial information was available. Both units have dedicated engineering, manufacturing, product business management and product line management functions. A small portion of our outside revenue is attributable to projects and recently developed products for which a segment has not yet been determined. The associated direct and indirect costs are presented in the category of Corporate and other, along with other corporate costs. FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC OPERATIONS AND EXPORT SALES Financial information relating to foreign and domestic operations for fiscal years 2016, 2015 and 2014, is set forth in Note 15, ‘‘Segment and Geographic Information’’ of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 15 of this annual report. 21 ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS You should carefully consider the followings risks when considering an investment in our Common Stock. These risks could materially affect our business, results of operations or financial condition, cause the trading price of our Common Stock to decline materially or cause our actual results to differ materially from those expected or those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by us. These risks are not exclusive, and additional risks to which we are subject include, but are not limited to, the factors mentioned under ‘‘Forward-Looking Statements’’ and the risk of our businesses described elsewhere in this annual report. Additionally, these risks and uncertainties described herein are not the only ones facing us. Other events that we do not currently anticipate or that we currently deem immaterial also may affect our business, results of operations or financial condition. RISKS RELATED TO THE MERGER WITH ROFIN We may not be able to integrate the business of Rofin successfully with our own or realize the anticipated benefits of the merger. We will be required to devote significant management attention and resources to integrating our business practices with those of Rofin. Potential difficulties that we may encounter as part of the integration process include the following: (cid:127) the inability to successfully combine our business with Rofin in a manner that permits the combined company to achieve the full synergies and other benefits anticipated to result from the merger; (cid:127) complexities associated with managing the combined businesses, including difficulty addressing possible differences in corporate cultures and management philosophies and the challenge of integrating products, services, complex and different information technology systems, technology, networks and other assets of each of the companies in a cohesive manner; and (cid:127) potential unknown liabilities and unforeseen increased expenses or delays related to the merger and the integration of Rofin, including as a result of the requirement for holding separate Rofin’s business located in Hull, England. In addition, we have operated independently prior to the merger and it is possible that the integration process following the merger could result in: (cid:127) diversion of the attention of our management; and (cid:127) the disruption of, or the loss of momentum in, our business or inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures or policies, any of which could adversely affect our ability to maintain relationships with customers, suppliers, employees and other constituencies or our ability to achieve the anticipated benefits of the merger, or could reduce our earnings or otherwise adversely affect our business and financial results. (cid:127) In addition, prior to the merger, Rofin’s business faced risks and uncertainties, including those faced by our business and identified below. Rofin’s business may not meet future expectations due to these factors despite our integration efforts. Our future results will suffer if we do not effectively manage our expanded operations following the merger. Following the merger, the size of the business of the combined company has increased significantly. Our future success depends, in part, upon our ability to manage this expanded business, which will pose substantial challenges for management, including challenges related to the management and monitoring of new operations and associated increased costs and complexity. There can be no 22 assurances that we will be successful or that we will realize the expected synergies and benefits anticipated from the merger. We have incurred and will continue to incur substantial expenses related to the merger with and the integration of Rofin. We have and expect to continue to incur substantial expenses in connection with the merger and the integration of Rofin. There are a large number of processes, policies, procedures, operations, technologies and systems that will need to be integrated, including purchasing, accounting and finance, sales, payroll, pricing, marketing and employee benefits. While we have assumed that a certain level of expenses will be incurred, there are many factors beyond our control that could affect the total amount or the timing of the integration expenses. Moreover, many of the expenses that will be incurred are, by their nature, difficult to estimate accurately. These expenses could, particularly in the near term, exceed the savings we expect to achieve from the elimination of duplicative expenses and the realization of economies of scale and cost savings. These integration expenses could result in significant charges to earnings which we cannot currently quantify. Charges to earnings resulting from the application of the purchase method of accounting to the Rofin acquisition may adversely affect our results of operations. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, we will account for the Rofin acquisition using the purchase method of accounting, which will result in charges to earnings that could have a material adverse effect on the market value of our common stock following completion of the acquisition. Under the purchase method of accounting, we will allocate the total purchase price of Rofin’s net tangible and identifiable intangible assets based upon their estimated fair values at the acquisition date. The excess of the purchase price over net tangible and identifiable intangible assets will be recorded as goodwill. We will incur additional depreciation and amortization expense over the useful lives of certain of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired in connection with the acquisition. In addition, to the extent the value of goodwill or intangible assets with indefinite lives becomes impaired, we may be required to incur material charges relating to the impairment of those assets. These depreciation, amortization and potential impairment charges could have a material impact on our results of operations. Our indebtedness following the merger is substantially greater than our indebtedness prior to the merger. This increased level of indebtedness could adversely affect us, including by decreasing our business flexibility, and will increase our borrowing costs. In November 2016 we entered into the Credit Agreement which provides for a 670 million Euro term loan, all of which has been drawn, and a $100 million revolving credit facility, under which a 10 million Euro letter of credit has been issued. We may incur additional indebtedness in the future by accessing the revolving credit facility under the Credit Agreement and/or entering into new financing arrangements. Our ability to pay interest and repay the principal of our current indebtedness is dependent upon our ability to manage our business operations and the ongoing interest rate environment. There can be no assurance that we will be able to manage any of these risks successfully. The Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative covenants, including covenants regarding the payment of taxes and other obligations, maintenance of insurance, reporting requirements and compliance with applicable laws and regulations, and negative covenants, including covenants limiting the ability of us and our subsidiaries to, among other things, incur debt, grant liens, make investments, make certain restricted payments, transact with affiliates, and sell assets. The Credit Agreement also requires us and our subsidiaries to maintain a senior secured net leverage ratio as of the last day of each fiscal quarter of less of than or equal to 3.50 to 1.00. The Credit Agreement contains customary events of default that include, among other things, payment defaults, cross defaults with certain other 23 indebtedness, violation of covenants, inaccuracy of representations and warranties in any material respect, change in control of the Company and the Borrower, judgment defaults, and bankruptcy and insolvency events. If an event of default exists, the lenders may require the immediate payment of all Obligations, as defined in the Credit Agreement, and may exercise certain other rights and remedies provided for under the Credit Agreement, the other loan documents and applicable law. The acceleration of such obligations is automatic upon the occurrence of a bankruptcy and insolvency event of default. There can be no assurance that we will have sufficient financial resources or we will be able to arrange financing to repay our borrowings at such time. Our substantially increased indebtedness and higher debt-to-equity ratio following completion of the merger in comparison to that prior to the merger will have the effect, among other things, of reducing our flexibility to respond to changing business and economic conditions and will increase our borrowing costs. In addition, the amount of cash required to service our increased indebtedness levels and thus the demands on our cash resources will be greater than the amount of cash flows required to service our indebtedness or that of Rofin individually prior to the merger. The increased levels of indebtedness could also reduce funds available for our investments in product development as well as capital expenditures, dividends, share repurchases and other activities and may create competitive disadvantages for us relative to other companies with lower debt levels. We may not be able to divest the Rofin business located in Hull, England on favorable terms. On October 26, 2016, the European Commission approved under the EU Merger Regulation our acquisition of Rofin, conditional on the divestment of Rofin’s low power CO2 laser business based in Hull, United Kingdom (the ‘‘Hull Business’’) after the closing of the acquisition. We are required to hold the Hull Business separate until such time as it is divested. During fiscal years 2013 through 2015, the Hull Business had annual revenues of approximately 23-25 million British Pound Sterling and, accordingly, we will not have the revenue from the Hull Business once it is sold. If we are unable to successfully timely divest the Hull Business or if the European Commission does not approve a proposed sale thereof, then a divestiture trustee may be appointed by the European Commission and the terms for any sale of the Hull Business will be at the discretion of such trustee. During the period of time in which we are holding the Hull Business separate, the conditions for such structure may be a distraction on certain members of our senior management team. BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT AND INDUSTRY TRENDS Our operating results, including net sales, net income (loss) and adjusted EBITDA in dollars and as a percentage of net sales, as well as our stock price have varied in the past, and our future operating results, including those results from the newly acquired Rofin business, will continue to be subject to quarterly and annual fluctuations based upon numerous factors, including those discussed in this Item 1A and throughout this report. Our stock price will continue to be subject to daily variations as well. Our future operating results and stock price may not follow any past trends or meet our guidance and expectations. Our net sales and operating results, such as adjusted EBITDA percentage, net income (loss) and operating expenses, and our stock price have varied in the past and may vary significantly from quarter to quarter and from year to year in the future. We believe a number of factors, many of which are outside of our control, could cause these variations and make them difficult to predict, including: (cid:127) general economic uncertainties in the macroeconomic and local economies facing us, our customers and the markets we serve; (cid:127) fluctuations in demand for our products or downturns in the industries that we serve; 24 (cid:127) the ability of our suppliers, both internal and external, to produce and deliver components and parts, including sole or limited source components, in a timely manner, in the quantity, quality and prices desired; (cid:127) the timing of receipt and conversion of bookings to net sales; (cid:127) the concentration of a significant amount of our backlog, and resultant net sales, with a few customers; (cid:127) rescheduling of shipments or cancellation of orders by our customers; (cid:127) fluctuations in our product mix; (cid:127) the ability of our customers’ other suppliers to provide sufficient material to support our customers’ products; (cid:127) currency fluctuations and stability, in particular the Euro, the Japanese Yen, the South Korean Won, the Chinese RMB and the US dollar as compared to other currencies; (cid:127) commodity pricing; (cid:127) introductions of new products and product enhancements by our competitors, entry of new competitors into our markets, pricing pressures and other competitive factors; (cid:127) our ability to develop, introduce, manufacture and ship new and enhanced products in a timely manner without defects; (cid:127) our ability to successfully expand our manufacturing capacity in G¨ottingen, Germany and add optics fabrication capacity at our site in Richmond, California; (cid:127) our ability to manage our manufacturing capacity and that of our suppliers; (cid:127) our reliance on contract manufacturing; (cid:127) the rate of market acceptance of our new products; (cid:127) the ability of our customers to pay for our products; (cid:127) expenses associated with acquisition-related activities; (cid:127) seasonal sales trends; (cid:127) access to applicable credit markets by us, our customers and their end customers; (cid:127) delays or reductions in customer purchases of our products in anticipation of the introduction of new and enhanced products by us or our competitors; (cid:127) our ability to control expenses; (cid:127) the level of capital spending of our customers; (cid:127) potential excess and/or obsolescence of our inventory; (cid:127) costs and timing of adhering to current and developing governmental regulations and reviews relating to our products and business; (cid:127) costs related to acquisitions of technology or businesses; (cid:127) impairment of goodwill, intangible assets and other long-lived assets; (cid:127) our ability to meet our expectations and forecasts and those of public market analysts and investors; 25 (cid:127) the availability of research funding by governments with regard to our customers in the scientific business, such as universities; (cid:127) continued government spending on defense-related projects where we are a subcontractor; (cid:127) maintenance of supply relating to products sold to the government on terms which we would prefer not to accept; (cid:127) changes in policy, interpretations, or challenges to the allowability of costs incurred under government cost accounting standards; (cid:127) damage to our reputation as a result of coverage in social media, Internet blogs or other media outlets; (cid:127) managing our and other parties’ compliance with contracts in multiple languages and jurisdictions; (cid:127) managing our internal and third party sales representatives and distributors, including compliance with all applicable laws; (cid:127) impact of government economic policies on macroeconomic conditions; (cid:127) costs and expenses from litigation; (cid:127) costs associated with designing around or payment of licensing fees associated with issued patents in our fields of business; (cid:127) government support of alternative energy industries, such as solar; (cid:127) negative impacts related to the recent ‘‘Brexit’’ vote by the United Kingdom, particularly with regard to sales from our Glasgow, Scotland facility to other jurisdictions and purchases of supplies from outside the United Kingdom by such facility; (cid:127) the future impact of legislation, rulemaking, and changes in accounting, tax, defense procurement, or export policies; and (cid:127) distraction of management related to acquisition or divestment activities. In addition, we often recognize a substantial portion of our sales in the last month of our fiscal quarters. Our expenses for any given quarter are typically based on expected sales and if sales are below expectations in any given quarter, the adverse impact of the shortfall on our operating results may be magnified by our inability to adjust spending quickly enough to compensate for the shortfall. We also base our manufacturing on our forecasted product mix for the quarter. If the actual product mix varies significantly from our forecast, we may not be able to fill some orders during that quarter, which would result in delays in the shipment of our products. Accordingly, variations in timing of sales, particularly for our higher priced, higher margin products, can cause significant fluctuations in quarterly operating results. Due to these and other factors, such as varying product mix, we believe that quarter-to-quarter and year-to-year comparisons of our historical operating results may not be meaningful. You should not rely on our results for any quarter or year as an indication of our future performance. Our operating results in future quarters and years may be below public market analysts’ or investors’ expectations, which would likely cause the price of our stock to fall. In addition, over the past several years, U.S. and global equity markets have experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that have affected the stock prices of many technology companies both in and outside our industry. There has not always been a direct correlation between this volatility and the performance of particular companies subject to these stock price fluctuations. These factors, as well as general economic and political conditions or 26 investors’ concerns regarding the credibility of corporate financial statements, may have a material adverse effect on the market price of our stock in the future. We depend on sole source or limited source suppliers, both internal and external, for some of our key components and materials, including exotic materials, certain cutting-edge optics and crystals, in our products, which make us susceptible to supply shortages or price fluctuations that could adversely affect our business, particularly our ability to meet our customers’ delivery requirements. We currently purchase several key components and materials used in the manufacture of our products from sole source or limited source suppliers, both internal and external. In particular, from time-to-time our customers require us to ramp up production and/or accelerate delivery schedules of our products. Our key suppliers may not have the ability to increase their production in line with our customers’ demands. This can become acute during times of high growth in our customers’ businesses. Our failure to timely receive these key components and materials would likely cause delays in the shipment of our products, which would likely negatively impact both our customers and our business. Some of these suppliers are relatively small private companies that may discontinue their operations at any time and which may be particularly susceptible to prevailing economic conditions. Some of our suppliers are located in regions which may be susceptible to natural disasters, such as the flooding in Thailand and the earthquake, tsunami and resulting nuclear disaster in Japan and severe flooding and power loss in the Eastern part of the United States in recent years. Some may be vulnerable to man-made disasters, such as the recent worldwide shortage of neon gas as a result of the conflict in Ukraine. We typically purchase our components and materials through purchase orders or agreed upon terms and conditions and we do not have guaranteed supply arrangements with many of these suppliers. For certain long-lead time supplies or in order to lock-in pricing, we may be obligated to place purchase orders which are not cancelable or otherwise assume liability for a large amount of the ordered supplies, which limit our ability to adjust down our inventory liability in the event of market downturns or other customer cancellations or rescheduling of their purchase orders for our products. Some of our products, particularly in the flat panel display industry, require designs and specifications which are at the cutting-edge of available technologies. Our and our customers’ designs and specifications frequently change to meet rapidly evolving market demands. Accordingly, certain of our products require components and supplies which may be technologically difficult and unpredictable to manufacture. By their very nature, these types of components may only be available by a single supplier. These characteristics further pressure the timely delivery of such components. We may fail to obtain these supplies in a timely manner in the future. We may experience difficulty identifying alternative sources of supply for certain components used in our products and may have to incur expenses and management distraction in assisting our current and future suppliers to meet our and our customers’ technical requirements. We would experience further delays while identifying, evaluating and testing the products of these potential alternative suppliers. Furthermore, financial or other difficulties faced by these suppliers or significant changes in demand for these components or materials could limit their availability. We continue to consolidate our supply base and move supplier locations. When we transition locations we may increase our inventory of such products as a ‘‘safety stock’’ during the transition, which may cause the amount of inventory reflected on our balance sheet to increase. Additionally, many of our customers rely on sole source suppliers. In the event of a disruption of our customers’ supply chain, orders from our customers could decrease or be delayed. Any interruption or delay in the supply of any of these components or materials, or the inability to obtain these components and materials from alternate sources at acceptable prices and within a reasonable amount of time, or our failure to properly manage these moves, would impair our ability to meet scheduled product deliveries to our customers and could cause customers to cancel orders. We have historically relied exclusively on our own production capability to manufacture certain strategic components, crystals, semiconductor lasers, lasers and laser-based systems and recently acquired the capability to manufacture certain large format optics. Because we manufacture, package and test these 27 components, products and systems at our own facilities, and such components, products and systems are not readily available from other sources, any interruption in manufacturing would adversely affect our business. Since many of our products have lengthy qualification periods, our ability to introduce multiple suppliers for parts may be limited. In addition, our failure to achieve adequate manufacturing yields of these items at our manufacturing facilities may materially and adversely affect our operating results and financial condition. We participate in the microelectronics market, which requires significant research and development expenses to develop and maintain products and a failure to achieve market acceptance for our products could have a significant negative impact on our business and results of operations. The microelectronics market is characterized by rapid technological change, frequent product introductions, the volatility of product supply and demand, changing customer requirements and evolving industry standards. The nature of this market requires significant research and development expenses to participate, with substantial resources invested in advance of material sales of our products to our customers in this market. Additionally, our product offerings may become obsolete given the frequent introduction of alternative technologies. In the event either our customers’ or our products fail to gain market acceptance, or the microelectronics market fails to grow, it would likely have a significant negative effect on our business and results of operations. We participate in the flat panel display market, which has a relatively limited number of end customer manufacturers. Our backlog, timing of net sales and results of operations could be negatively impacted in the event our customers reschedule or cancel orders. In the flat panel display market, there are a relatively limited number of manufacturers who are the end customers for our annealing products. In fiscal 2016, Advanced Process Systems Corporation, an integrator in the flat panel display market based in South Korea, and Japanese Steel Works, Ltd., an integrator in the flat panel display market based in Japan, contributed more than 10% of our revenue. Given macroeconomic conditions, varying consumer demand and technical process limitations at manufacturers, our customers may seek to reschedule or cancel orders. This was recently seen with a requested expedited shipment of a Linebeam 1500 product for our third fiscal quarter of 2015, which delivery date was then changed at the customer’s request back to its originally scheduled date in the fourth fiscal quarter of 2015. These larger flat panel-related systems have large average selling prices. Any rescheduling or canceling of such orders by our customers will likely have a significant impact on our quarterly or annual net sales and results of operations and could negatively impact inventory values and backlog. Additionally, challenges in meeting evolving technological requirements for these complex products by us and our suppliers could also result in delays in shipments, rescheduled or canceled orders by our customers. This could negatively impact our backlog, timing of net sales and results of operations. As of October 1, 2016, flat panel display systems represented 63% of our backlog, compared to 32% at October 3, 2015. Since our backlog includes higher average selling price flat panel display systems, any delays or cancellation of shipments could have a material adverse effect on our financial results. Some of our laser systems are complex in design and may contain defects that are not detected until deployed by our customers, which could increase our costs and reduce our net sales. Lasers and laser systems are inherently complex in design and require ongoing regular maintenance. The manufacture of our lasers, laser products and systems involves a highly complex and precise process. As a result of the technological complexity of our products, in particular the flat panel annealing systems, changes in our or our suppliers’ manufacturing processes or the inadvertent use of defective materials by us or our suppliers could result in a material adverse effect on our ability to 28 achieve acceptable manufacturing yields and product reliability. To the extent that we do not achieve and maintain our projected yields or product reliability, our business, operating results, financial condition and customer relationships would be adversely affected. We provide warranties on a majority of our product sales, and reserves for estimated warranty costs are recorded during the period of sale. The determination of such reserves requires us to make estimates of failure rates and expected costs to repair or replace the products under warranty. We typically establish warranty reserves based on historical warranty costs for each product line. If actual return rates and/or repair and replacement costs differ significantly from our estimates, adjustments to cost of sales may be required in future periods which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations. Our customers may discover defects in our products after the products have been fully deployed and operated, including under the end user’s peak stress conditions. In addition, some of our products are combined with products from other vendors, which may contain defects. As a result, should problems occur, it may be difficult to identify the source of the problem. If we are unable to identify and fix defects or other problems, we could experience, among other things: (cid:127) loss of customers or orders; (cid:127) increased costs of product returns and warranty expenses; (cid:127) damage to our brand reputation; (cid:127) failure to attract new customers or achieve market acceptance; (cid:127) diversion of development, engineering and manufacturing resources; and (cid:127) legal actions by our customers and/or their end users. The occurrence of any one or more of the foregoing factors could seriously harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. Continued volatility in the advanced packaging and semiconductor manufacturing markets could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. A portion of our net sales in the microelectronics market depends on the demand for our products by advanced packaging applications and semiconductor equipment companies. These markets have historically been characterized by sudden and severe cyclical variations in product supply and demand, which have often severely affected the demand for semiconductor manufacturing equipment, including laser-based tools and systems. The timing, severity and duration of these market cycles are difficult to predict, and we may not be able to respond effectively to these cycles. The continuing uncertainty in these markets severely limits our ability to predict our business prospects or financial results in these markets. During industry downturns, our net sales from these markets may decline suddenly and significantly. Our ability to rapidly and effectively reduce our cost structure in response to such downturns is limited by the fixed nature of many of our expenses in the near term and by our need to continue our investment in next-generation product technology and to support and service our products. In addition, due to the relatively long manufacturing lead times for some of the systems and subsystems we sell to these markets, we may incur expenditures or purchase raw materials or components for products we cannot sell. Accordingly, downturns in the semiconductor capital equipment market may materially harm our operating results. Conversely, when upturns in these markets occur, we must be able to rapidly and effectively increase our manufacturing capacity to meet increases in customer demand that may be extremely rapid, and if we fail to do so we may lose business to our competitors and our relationships with our customers may be harmed. 29 We are exposed to risks associated with worldwide economic conditions and related uncertainties which could negatively impact demand for our products and results of operations. Volatility and disruption in the capital and credit markets, depressed consumer confidence, government economic policies, negative economic conditions, volatile corporate profits and reduced capital spending could negatively impact demand for our products. In particular, it is difficult to develop and implement strategy, sustainable business models and efficient operations, as well as effectively manage supply chain relationships in the face of such conditions including uncertainty regarding the ability of some of our suppliers to continue operations and provide us with uninterrupted supply flow. Our ability to maintain our research and development investments in our broad product offerings may be adversely impacted in the event that our sales decline and do not increase in the future. Spending and the timing thereof by consumers and businesses have a significant impact on our results and, where such spending is delayed or canceled, it could have a material negative impact on our operating results. Current global economic conditions remain uncertain and challenging. Weakness in our end markets could negatively impact our net sales, gross margin and operating expenses, and consequently have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Uncertainty in global fiscal policy has likely had an adverse impact on global financial markets and overall economic activity in recent years. Should this uncertain financial policy recur, it would likely negatively impact global economic activity. Any weakness in global economies would also likely have negative repercussions on U.S. and global credit and financial markets, and further exacerbate sovereign debt concerns in the European Union. All of these factors would likely adversely impact the global demand for our products and the performance of our investments, and would likely have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. The financial turmoil that has affected the banking system and financial markets in recent years could result in tighter credit markets and lower levels of liquidity in some financial markets. There could be a number of follow-on effects from a tightened credit environment on our business, including the insolvency of key suppliers or their inability to obtain credit to finance development and/or manufacture products resulting in product delays; inability of customers to obtain credit to finance purchases of our products and/or customer insolvencies; and failure of financial institutions negatively impacting our treasury functions. In the event our customers are unable to obtain credit or otherwise pay for our shipped products it could significantly impact our ability to collect on our outstanding accounts receivable. Other income and expense also could vary materially from expectations depending on gains or losses realized on the sale or exchange of financial instruments; impairment charges resulting from revaluations of debt and equity securities and other investments; interest rates; cash balances; and changes in fair value of derivative instruments. Volatility in the financial markets and any overall economic uncertainty increase the risk that the actual amounts realized in the future on our financial instruments could differ significantly from the fair values currently assigned to them. Uncertainty about current global economic conditions could also continue to increase the volatility of our stock price. In addition, political and social turmoil related to international conflicts, terrorist acts, civil unrest and mass migration may put further pressure on economic conditions in the United States and the rest of the world. Unstable economic, political and social conditions make it difficult for our customers, our suppliers and us to accurately forecast and plan future business activities. If such conditions persist, our business, financial condition and results of operations could suffer. Additionally, unstable economic conditions can provide significant pressures and burdens on individuals, which could cause them to engage in inappropriate business conduct. See ‘‘Part II, Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.’’ 30 Our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments are managed through various banks around the world and volatility in the capital and credit market conditions could cause financial institutions to fail or materially harm service levels provided by such banks, both of which could have an adverse impact on our ability to timely access funds. World capital and credit markets have been and may continue to experience volatility and disruption. In some cases, the markets have exerted downward pressure on stock prices and credit capacity for certain issuers, as well as pressured the solvency of some financial institutions. These financial institutions, including banks, have had difficulty timely performing regular services and in some cases have failed or otherwise been largely taken over by governments. We maintain our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments with a number of financial institutions around the world. Should some or all of these financial institutions fail or otherwise be unable to timely perform requested services, we would likely have a limited ability to timely access our cash deposited with such institutions, or, in extreme circumstances the failure of such institutions could cause us to be unable to access cash for the foreseeable future. If we are unable to quickly access our funds when we need them, we may need to increase the use of our existing credit lines or access more expensive credit, if available. If we are unable to access our cash or if we access existing or additional credit or are unable to access additional credit, it could have a negative impact on our operations, including our reported net income. In addition, the willingness of financial institutions to continue to accept our cash deposits will impact our ability to diversify our investment risk among institutions. We are exposed to credit risk and fluctuations in the market values of our investment portfolio. Although we have not recognized any material losses on our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, future declines in their market values could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results. Given the global nature of our business, we have investments both domestically and internationally. There has recently been growing pressure on the creditworthiness of sovereign nations, particularly in Europe where a significant portion of our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments are invested, which results in corresponding pressure on the valuation of the securities issued by such nations. Additionally, our overall investment portfolio is often concentrated in government-issued securities such as U.S. Treasury securities and government agencies, corporate notes, commercial paper and money market funds. Credit ratings and pricing of these investments can be negatively impacted by liquidity, credit deterioration or losses, financial results, or other factors. Additionally, liquidity issues or political actions by sovereign nations could result in decreased values for our investments in certain government securities. As a result, the value or liquidity of our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments could decline or become materially impaired, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results. See ‘‘Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.’’ Our future success depends on our ability to increase our sales volumes and decrease our costs to offset potential declines in the average selling prices (‘‘ASPs’’) of our products and, if we are unable to realize greater sales volumes and lower costs, our operating results may suffer. Our ability to increase our sales volume and our future success depends on the continued growth of the markets for lasers, laser systems and related accessories, as well as our ability to identify, in advance, emerging markets for laser-based systems. We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully identify, on a timely basis, new high-growth markets in the future. Moreover, we cannot assure you that new markets will develop for our products or our customers’ products, or that our technology or pricing will enable such markets to develop. Future demand for our products is uncertain and will depend to a great degree on continued technological development and the introduction of new or enhanced products. If this does not continue, sales of our products may decline and our business will be harmed. 31 We have in the past experienced decreases in the ASPs of some of our products. As competing products become more widely available, the ASPs of our products may decrease. If we are unable to offset any decrease in our ASPs by increasing our sales volumes, our net sales will decline. In addition, to maintain our gross margins, we must continue to reduce the cost of manufacturing our products while maintaining their high quality. From time to time, our products, like many complex technological products, may fail in greater frequency than anticipated. This can lead to further charges, which can result in higher costs, lower gross margins and lower operating results. Furthermore, as ASPs of our current products decline, we must develop and introduce new products and product enhancements with higher margins. If we cannot maintain our gross margins, our operating results could be seriously harmed, particularly if the ASPs of our products decrease significantly. Our future success depends on our ability to develop and successfully introduce new and enhanced products that meet the needs of our customers. Our current products address a broad range of commercial and scientific research applications in the photonics markets. We cannot assure you that the market for these applications will continue to generate significant or consistent demand for our products. Demand for our products could be significantly diminished by disrupting technologies or products that replace them or render them obsolete. Furthermore, the new and enhanced products in certain markets generally continue to be smaller in size and have lower ASPs, and therefore, we have to sell more units to maintain revenue levels. Accordingly, we must continue to invest in research and development in order to develop competitive products. Our future success depends on our ability to anticipate our customers’ needs and develop products that address those needs. Introduction of new products and product enhancements will require that we effectively transfer production processes from research and development to manufacturing and coordinate our efforts with those of our suppliers to achieve volume production rapidly. If we fail to transfer production processes effectively, develop product enhancements or introduce new products in sufficient quantities to meet the needs of our customers as scheduled, our net sales may be reduced and our business may be harmed. We face risks associated with our foreign operations and sales that could harm our financial condition and results of operations. For fiscal 2016, fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014, 76%, 73% and 74%, respectively, of our net sales were derived from customers outside of the United States. A majority of Rofin’s sales have also been to customers outside of the United States in recent years. We anticipate that foreign sales, particularly in Asia, will continue to account for a significant portion of our net sales in the foreseeable future. A global economic slowdown or a natural disaster could have a negative effect on various foreign markets in which we operate, such as the earthquake, tsunami and resulting nuclear disaster in Japan and the flooding in Thailand in recent years. Such a slowdown may cause us to reduce our presence in certain countries, which may negatively affect the overall level of business in such countries. Our foreign sales are primarily through our direct sales force. Additionally, some foreign sales are made through foreign distributors and representatives. Our foreign operations and sales are subject to a number of risks, including: (cid:127) longer accounts receivable collection periods; (cid:127) the impact of recessions and other economic conditions in economies outside the United States; (cid:127) unexpected changes in regulatory requirements; (cid:127) certification requirements; 32 (cid:127) environmental regulations; (cid:127) reduced protection for intellectual property rights in some countries; (cid:127) potentially adverse tax consequences; (cid:127) political and economic instability; (cid:127) import/export regulations, tariffs and trade barriers; (cid:127) compliance with applicable United States and foreign anti-corruption laws; (cid:127) cultural and management differences; (cid:127) reliance in some jurisdictions on third party sales channel partners; (cid:127) preference for locally produced products; and (cid:127) shipping and other logistics complications. Our business could also be impacted by international conflicts, terrorist and military activity, civil unrest and pandemic illness which could cause a slowdown in customer orders, cause customer order cancellations or negatively impact availability of supplies or limit our ability to timely service our installed base of products. We are also subject to the risks of fluctuating foreign currency exchange rates, which could materially adversely affect the sales price of our products in foreign markets, as well as the costs and expenses of our foreign subsidiaries. While we use forward exchange contracts and other risk management techniques to hedge our foreign currency exposure, we remain exposed to the economic risks of foreign currency fluctuations. We may not be able to protect our proprietary technology which could adversely affect our competitive advantage. Maintenance of intellectual property rights and the protection thereof is important to our business. We rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws and restrictions on disclosure to protect our intellectual property rights. Our patent applications may not be approved, any patents that may be issued may not sufficiently protect our intellectual property and any issued patents may be challenged by third parties. Other parties may independently develop similar or competing technology or design around any patents that may be issued to us. We cannot be certain that the steps we have taken will prevent the misappropriation of our intellectual property, particularly in foreign countries where the laws may not protect our proprietary rights as fully as in the United States. Further, we may be required to enforce our intellectual property or other proprietary rights through litigation, which, regardless of success, could result in substantial costs and diversion of management’s attention. Additionally, there may be existing patents of which we are unaware that could be pertinent to our business and it is not possible for us to know whether there are patent applications pending that our products might infringe upon since these applications are often not publicly available until a patent is issued or published. We may, in the future, be subject to claims or litigation from third parties, for claims of infringement of their proprietary rights or to determine the scope and validity of our proprietary rights or the proprietary rights of competitors or other rights holders. These claims could result in costly litigation and the diversion of our technical and management personnel. Adverse resolution of litigation may harm our operating results or financial condition. In recent years, there has been significant litigation in the United States and around the world involving patents and other intellectual property rights. This has been seen in our industry, for example 33 in the recently concluded patent-related litigation between IMRA America, Inc. (‘‘Imra’’) and IPG Photonics Corporation and in Imra’s recently brought litigation against two of our German subsidiaries. From time to time, like many other technology companies, we have received communications from other parties asserting the existence of patent rights, copyrights, trademark rights or other intellectual property rights which such third parties believe may cover certain of our products, processes, technologies or information. In the future, we may be a party to litigation to protect our intellectual property or as a result of an alleged infringement of others’ intellectual property whether through direct claims or by way of indemnification claims of our customers, as, in some cases, we contractually agree to indemnify our customers against third-party infringement claims relating to our products. These claims and any resulting lawsuit, if successful, could subject us to significant liability for damages or invalidation of our proprietary rights. These lawsuits, regardless of their success, would likely be time-consuming and expensive to resolve and would divert management time and attention. Any potential intellectual property litigation could also force us to do one or more of the following: (cid:127) stop manufacturing, selling or using our products that use the infringed intellectual property; (cid:127) obtain from the owner of the infringed intellectual property right a license to sell or use the relevant technology, although such license may not be available on reasonable terms, or at all; or (cid:127) redesign the products that use the technology. If we are forced to take any of these actions or are otherwise a party to lawsuits of this nature, we may incur significant losses and our business may be seriously harmed. We do not have insurance to cover potential claims of this type. If our goodwill or intangible assets become impaired, we may be required to record a significant charge to earnings. Under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, we review our intangible assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Goodwill is required to be tested for impairment at least annually. Factors that may be considered in determining whether a change in circumstances indicating that the carrying value of our goodwill or other intangible assets may not be recoverable include declines in our stock price and market capitalization or future cash flows projections. A decline in our stock price, or any other adverse change in market conditions, particularly if such change has the effect of changing one of the critical assumptions or estimates we used to calculate the estimated fair value of our reporting units, could result in a change to the estimation of fair value that could result in an impairment charge. Any such material charges, whether related to goodwill or purchased intangible assets, may have a material negative impact on our financial and operating results. We depend on skilled personnel to operate our business effectively in a rapidly changing market, and if we are unable to retain existing or hire additional personnel when needed, our ability to develop and sell our products could be harmed. Our ability to continue to attract and retain highly skilled personnel will be a critical factor in determining whether we will be successful in the future. Recruiting and retaining highly skilled personnel in certain functions continues to be difficult. At certain locations where we operate, the cost of living is extremely high and it may be difficult to retain key employees and management at a reasonable cost. We may not be successful in attracting, assimilating or retaining qualified personnel to fulfill our current or future needs. Our failure to attract additional employees and retain our existing employees could adversely affect our growth and our business. Our future success depends upon the continued services of our executive officers and other key engineering, sales, marketing, manufacturing and support personnel, any of whom may leave and our 34 ability to effectively transition to their successors. Our inability to retain or to effectively transition to their successors could harm our business and our results of operations. The long sales cycles for our products may cause us to incur significant expenses without offsetting net sales. Customers often view the purchase of our products as a significant and strategic decision. As a result, customers typically expend significant effort in evaluating, testing and qualifying our products before making a decision to purchase them, resulting in a lengthy initial sales cycle. While our customers are evaluating our products and before they place an order with us, we may incur substantial sales and marketing and research and development expenses to customize our products to the customers’ needs. We may also expend significant management efforts, increase manufacturing capacity and order long lead-time components or materials prior to receiving an order. Even after this evaluation process, a potential customer may not purchase our products. As a result, these long sales cycles may cause us to incur significant expenses without ever receiving net sales to offset such expenses. The markets in which we sell our products are intensely competitive and increased competition could cause reduced sales levels, reduced gross margins or the loss of market share. Competition in the various photonics markets in which we provide products is very intense. We compete against a number of large public and private companies, including CVI Melles Griot, Novanta Inc., IPG Photonics Corporation, Lumentum Holdings Inc., MKS Instruments, Inc. and Trumpf GmbH, as well as other smaller companies. Some of our competitors are large companies that have significant financial, technical, marketing and other resources. These competitors may be able to devote greater resources than we can to the development, promotion, sale and support of their products. Some of our competitors are much better positioned than we are to acquire other companies in order to gain new technologies or products that may displace our product lines. Any of these acquisitions could give our competitors a strategic advantage. Any business combinations or mergers among our competitors, forming larger companies with greater resources, could result in increased competition, price reductions, reduced margins or loss of market share, any of which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Additional competitors may enter the markets in which we serve, both foreign and domestic, and we are likely to compete with new companies in the future. We may encounter potential customers that, due to existing relationships with our competitors, are committed to the products offered by these competitors. Further, our current or potential customers may determine to develop and produce products for their own use which are competitive to our products. As a result of the foregoing factors, we expect that competitive pressures may result in price reductions, reduced margins, loss of sales and loss of market share. In addition, in markets where there are a limited number of customers, competition is particularly intense. If we fail to accurately forecast component and material requirements for our products, we could incur additional costs and incur significant delays in shipments, which could result in a loss of customers. We use rolling forecasts based on anticipated product orders and material requirements planning systems to determine our product requirements. It is very important that we accurately predict both the demand for our products and the lead times required to obtain the necessary components and materials. We depend on our suppliers for most of our product components and materials. Lead times for components and materials that we order vary significantly and depend on factors including the specific supplier requirements, the size of the order, contract terms and current market demand for components. For substantial increases in our sales levels of certain products, some of our suppliers may need at least nine months lead-time. If we overestimate our component and material requirements, we may have excess inventory, which would increase our costs. If we underestimate our component and 35 material requirements, we may have inadequate inventory, which could interrupt and delay delivery of our products to our customers. Any of these occurrences would negatively impact our net sales, business or operating results. Our reliance on contract manufacturing and outsourcing may adversely impact our financial results and operations due to our decreased control over the performance and timing of certain aspects of our manufacturing. Our manufacturing strategy includes partnering with contract manufacturers to outsource non-core subassemblies and less complex turnkey products, including some performed at international sites located in Asia and Eastern Europe. Our ability to resume internal manufacturing operations for certain products and components in a timely manner may be eliminated. The cost, quality, performance and availability of contract manufacturing operations are and will be essential to the successful production and sale of many of our products. Our financial condition or results of operation could be adversely impacted if any contract manufacturer or other supplier is unable for any reason, including as a result of the impact of worldwide economic conditions, to meet our cost, quality, performance, and availability standards. We may not be able to provide contract manufacturers with product volumes that are high enough to achieve sufficient cost savings. If shipments fall below forecasted levels, we may incur increased costs or be required to take ownership of the inventory. Also, our ability to control the quality of products produced by contract manufacturers may be limited and quality issues may not be resolved in a timely manner, which could adversely impact our financial condition or results of operations. If we fail to effectively manage our growth or, alternatively, our spending during downturns, our business could be disrupted, which could harm our operating results. Growth in sales, combined with the challenges of managing geographically dispersed operations, can place a significant strain on our management systems and resources, and our anticipated growth in future operations could continue to place such a strain. The failure to effectively manage our growth could disrupt our business and harm our operating results. Our ability to successfully offer our products and implement our business plan in evolving markets requires an effective planning and management process. In economic downturns, we must effectively manage our spending and operations to ensure our competitive position during the downturn, as well as our future opportunities when the economy improves, remain intact. The failure to effectively manage our spending and operations could disrupt our business and harm our operating results. Historically, acquisitions have been an important element of our strategy. However, we may not find suitable acquisition candidates in the future and we may not be able to successfully integrate and manage acquired businesses. Any acquisitions we make could disrupt our business and harm our financial condition. We have in the past made strategic acquisitions of other corporations and entities, including Rofin in November 2016, as well as asset purchases, and we continue to evaluate potential strategic acquisitions of complementary companies, products and technologies. In the event of any future acquisitions, we could: (cid:127) issue stock that would dilute our current stockholders’ percentage ownership; (cid:127) pay cash that would decrease our working capital; (cid:127) incur debt; (cid:127) assume liabilities; or (cid:127) incur expenses related to impairment of goodwill and amortization. 36 Acquisitions also involve numerous risks, including: (cid:127) problems combining the acquired operations, systems, technologies or products; (cid:127) an inability to realize expected operating efficiencies or product integration benefits; (cid:127) difficulties in coordinating and integrating geographically separated personnel, organizations, systems and facilities; (cid:127) difficulties integrating business cultures; (cid:127) unanticipated costs or liabilities, including the costs associated with improving the internal controls of the acquired company; (cid:127) diversion of management’s attention from our core businesses; (cid:127) adverse effects on existing business relationships with suppliers and customers; (cid:127) potential loss of key employees, particularly those of the purchased organizations; (cid:127) incurring unforeseen obligations or liabilities in connection with acquisitions; and (cid:127) the failure to complete acquisitions even after signing definitive agreements which, among other things, would result in the expensing of potentially significant professional fees and other charges in the period in which the acquisition or negotiations are terminated. We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully identify appropriate acquisition candidates, to integrate any businesses, products, technologies or personnel that we might acquire in the future or achieve the anticipated benefits of such transactions, which may harm our business. Our market is unpredictable and characterized by rapid technological changes and evolving standards demanding a significant investment in research and development, and, if we fail to address changing market conditions, our business and operating results will be harmed. The photonics industry is characterized by extensive research and development, rapid technological change, frequent new product introductions, changes in customer requirements and evolving industry standards. Because this industry is subject to rapid change, it is difficult to predict its potential size or future growth rate. Our success in generating net sales in this industry will depend on, among other things: (cid:127) maintaining and enhancing our relationships with our customers; (cid:127) the education of potential end-user customers about the benefits of lasers and laser systems; and (cid:127) our ability to accurately predict and develop our products to meet industry standards. For our fiscal years 2016, 2015 and 2014, our research and development costs were $81.8 million (9.5% of net sales), $81.5 million (10.2% of net sales) and $79.1 million (10.0% of net sales), respectively. We cannot assure you that our expenditures for research and development will result in the introduction of new products or, if such products are introduced, that those products will achieve sufficient market acceptance or to generate sales to offset the costs of development. Our failure to address rapid technological changes in our markets could adversely affect our business and results of operations. We are exposed to lawsuits in the normal course of business which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, or financial condition. We are exposed to lawsuits in the normal course of our business, including product liability claims, if personal injury, death or commercial losses occur from the use of our products. While we typically 37 maintain business insurance, including directors’ and officers’ policies, litigation can be expensive, lengthy, and disruptive to normal business operations, including the potential impact of indemnification obligations for individuals named in any such lawsuits. We may not, however, be able to secure insurance coverage on terms acceptable to us in the future. Moreover, the results of complex legal proceedings are difficult to predict. An unfavorable resolution of a particular lawsuit, including a recall or redesign of products if ultimately determined to be defective, could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, or financial condition. We use standard laboratory and manufacturing materials that could be considered hazardous and we could be liable for any damage or liability resulting from accidental environmental contamination or injury. Although most of our products do not incorporate hazardous or toxic materials and chemicals, some of the gases used in our excimer lasers and some of the liquid dyes used in some of our scientific laser products are highly toxic. In addition, our operations involve the use of standard laboratory and manufacturing materials that could be considered hazardous. Also, if a facility fire were to occur at our Sunnyvale, California site and were to spread to a reactor used to grow semiconductor wafers, it could release highly toxic emissions. We believe that our safety procedures for handling and disposing of such materials comply with all federal, state and offshore regulations and standards. However, the risk of accidental environmental contamination or injury from such materials cannot be entirely eliminated. In the event of such an accident involving such materials, we could be liable for damages and such liability could exceed the amount of our liability insurance coverage and the resources of our business which could have an adverse effect on our financial results or our business as a whole. Compliance or the failure to comply with current and future environmental regulations could cause us significant expense. We are subject to a variety of federal, state, local and foreign environmental regulations relating to the use, storage, discharge and disposal of hazardous chemicals used during our manufacturing process or requiring design changes or recycling of products we manufacture. If we fail to comply with any present and future regulations, we could be subject to future liabilities, the suspension of production or a prohibition on the sale of products we manufacture. In addition, such regulations could restrict our ability to expand our facilities or could require us to acquire costly equipment, or to incur other significant expenses to comply with environmental regulations, including expenses associated with the recall of any non-compliant product and the management of historical waste. From time to time new regulations are enacted, and it is difficult to anticipate how such regulations will be implemented and enforced. We continue to evaluate the necessary steps for compliance with regulations as they are enacted. These regulations include, for example, the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemical substances (‘‘REACH’’), the Restriction on the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive (‘‘RoHS’’) and the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive (‘‘WEEE’’) enacted in the European Union which regulate the use of certain hazardous substances in, and require the collection, reuse and recycling of waste from, certain products we manufacture. This and similar legislation that has been or is in the process of being enacted in Japan, China, South Korea and various states of the United States may require us to re-design our products to ensure compliance with the applicable standards, for example by requiring the use of different types of materials. These redesigns or alternative materials may detrimentally impact the performance of our products, add greater testing lead-times for product introductions or have other similar effects. We believe we comply with all such legislation where our products are sold and we will continue to monitor these laws and the regulations being adopted under them to determine our responsibilities. In addition, we are monitoring legislation relating to the reduction of carbon emissions from industrial operations to determine whether we may be required to incur any additional material costs or expenses associated with our operations. We are 38 not currently aware of any such material costs or expenses. The SEC has promulgated rules requiring disclosure regarding the use of certain ‘‘conflict minerals’’ mined from the Democratic Republic of Congo and adjoining countries and procedures regarding a manufacturer’s efforts to prevent the sourcing of such minerals. The implementation of such rules has required us to incur additional expense and internal resources and may continue to do so in the future, particularly in the event that only a limited pool of suppliers are available to certify that products are free from ‘‘conflict minerals.’’ Our failure to comply with any of the foregoing regulatory requirements or contractual obligations could result in our being directly or indirectly liable for costs, fines or penalties and third-party claims, and could jeopardize our ability to conduct business in the United States and foreign countries. Our and our customers’ operations would be seriously harmed if our logistics or facilities or those of our suppliers, our customers’ suppliers or our contract manufacturers were to experience catastrophic loss. Our operations, logistics and facilities and those of our customers, suppliers and contract manufacturers could be subject to a catastrophic loss from fire, flood, earthquake, volcanic eruption, work stoppages, power outages, acts of war, pandemic illnesses, energy shortages, theft of assets, other natural disasters or terrorist activity. A substantial portion of our research and development activities, manufacturing, our corporate headquarters and other critical business operations are located near major earthquake faults in Santa Clara, California, an area with a history of seismic events. Any such loss or detrimental impact to any of our operations, logistics or facilities could disrupt our operations, delay production, shipments and net sales and result in large expenses to repair or replace the facility. While we have obtained insurance to cover most potential losses, after reviewing the costs and limitations associated with earthquake insurance, we have decided not to procure such insurance. We believe that this decision is consistent with decisions reached by numerous other companies located nearby. We cannot assure you that our existing insurance coverage will be adequate against all other possible losses. Difficulties with our enterprise resource planning (‘‘ERP’’) system and other parts of our global information technology system could harm our business and results of operation. If our network security measures are breached and unauthorized access is obtained to a customer’s data or our data or our information technology systems, we may incur significant legal and financial exposure and liabilities. Like many modern multinational corporations, we maintain a global information technology system, including software products licensed from third parties. Any system, network or Internet failures, misuse by system users, the hacking into or disruption caused by the unauthorized access by third parties or loss of license rights could disrupt our ability to timely and accurately manufacture and ship products or to report our financial information in compliance with the timelines mandated by the SEC. Any such failure, misuse, hacking, disruptions or loss would likely cause a diversion of management’s attention from the underlying business and could harm our operations. In addition, a significant failure of our global information technology system could adversely affect our ability to complete an evaluation of our internal controls and attestation activities pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Our information systems are subject to attacks, interruptions and failures. As part of our day-to-day business, we store our data and certain data about our customers in our global information technology system. While our system is designed with access security, if a third party gains unauthorized access to our data, including any regarding our customers, such a security breach could expose us to a risk of loss of this information, loss of business, litigation and possible liability. Our security measures may be breached as a result of third-party action, including intentional misconduct by computer hackers, employee error, malfeasance or otherwise. Additionally, third parties may attempt to fraudulently induce employees or customers into disclosing sensitive information such 39 as user names, passwords or other information in order to gain access to our customers’ data or our data, including our intellectual property and other confidential business information, or our information technology systems. Because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, or to sabotage systems, change frequently and generally are not recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. Any unauthorized access could result in a loss of confidence by our customers, damage our reputation, disrupt our business, lead to legal liability and negatively impact our future sales. Additionally, such actions could result in significant costs associated with loss of our intellectual property, impairment of our ability to conduct our operations, rebuilding our network and systems, prosecuting and defending litigation, responding to regulatory inquiries or actions, paying damages or taking other remedial steps. Changes in tax rates, tax liabilities or tax accounting rules could affect future results. As a global company, we are subject to taxation in the United States and various other countries and jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required to determine our worldwide tax liabilities. A number of factors may affect our future effective tax rates including, but not limited to: (cid:127) changes in the composition of earnings in countries or states with differing tax rates; (cid:127) changes the assessment of the ability to recognize our deferred tax assets and change in the valuation of our deferred tax liabilities; (cid:127) the resolution of issues arising from tax audits with various tax authorities, and in particular, the outcome of the German tax audits of our tax returns for fiscal years 2011 - 2014 and the U.S. tax audit of our tax return for fiscal year 2013; (cid:127) changes in our global structure that involve acquisitions including the Rofin acquisition, or an increased investment in technology outside of the United States to better align asset ownership and business functions with revenues and profits; (cid:127) adjustments to estimated taxes upon finalization of various tax returns; (cid:127) increases in expenses not deductible for tax purposes, including impairments of goodwill in connection with acquisitions; (cid:127) our ability to meet the eligibility requirements for tax holidays of limited time tax-advantage status; (cid:127) changes in available tax credits; (cid:127) changes in share-based compensation; (cid:127) changes in the tax laws or the interpretation of such tax laws, including the Base Erosion Profit Shifting (‘‘BEPS’’) project being conducted by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (‘‘OECD’’); (cid:127) changes in generally accepted accounting principles; and (cid:127) the repatriation of non-U.S. earnings for which we have not previously provided for U.S. taxes. We are also engaged in discussions with various tax authorities regarding the appropriate level of profitability for Coherent entities and this may result in changes to our worldwide tax liabilities. In addition, we are subject to regular examination of our income tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service (‘‘IRS’’) and other tax authorities. From time to time the United States, foreign and state governments make substantive changes to tax rules and the application of rules to companies, including various announcements from the United States government potentially impacting our ability to defer taxes on international earnings. We regularly assess the likelihood of favorable or unfavorable outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes. 40 Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, there can be no assurance that any final determination will not be materially different than the treatment reflected in our historical income tax provisions and accruals, which could materially and adversely affect our operating results and financial condition. Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure may create uncertainty regarding compliance matters. Federal securities laws, rules and regulations, as well as the rules and regulations of self-regulatory organizations such as NASDAQ and the NYSE, require companies to maintain extensive corporate governance measures, impose comprehensive reporting and disclosure requirements, set strict independence and financial expertise standards for audit and other committee members and impose civil and criminal penalties for companies and their chief executive officers, chief financial officers and directors for securities law violations. These laws, rules and regulations have increased and will continue to increase the scope, complexity and cost of our corporate governance, reporting and disclosure practices, which could harm our results of operations and divert management’s attention from business operations. Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure may create uncertainty regarding compliance matters. New or changed laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations in many cases. As a result, their application in practice may evolve over time. We are committed to maintaining high standards of ethics, corporate governance and public disclosure. Complying with evolving interpretations of new or changed legal requirements may cause us to incur higher costs as we revise current practices, policies and procedures, and may divert management time and attention from revenue generating to compliance activities. If our efforts to comply with new or changed laws, regulations and standards differ from the activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies due to ambiguities related to practice, our reputation may also be harmed. Governmental regulations, including duties, affecting the import or export of products could negatively affect our net sales. The United States and many foreign governments impose tariffs and duties on the import and export of products, including some of those which we sell. In particular, given our worldwide operations, we pay duties on certain products when they are imported into the United States for repair work as well as on certain of our products which are manufactured by our foreign subsidiaries. These products can be subject to a duty on the product value. Additionally, the United States and various foreign governments have imposed tariffs, controls, export license requirements and restrictions on the import or export of some technologies, especially encryption technology. From time to time, government agencies have proposed additional regulation of encryption technology, such as requiring the escrow and governmental recovery of private encryption keys. Governmental regulation of encryption technology and regulation of imports or exports, or our failure to obtain required import or export approval for our products, could harm our international and domestic sales and adversely affect our net sales. From time to time our duty calculations and payments are audited by government agencies. For example, we were audited in South Korea for customs duties and value-added-tax for the period March 2009 to March 2014. We were liable for additional payments, duties, taxes and penalties of $1.6 million, which we paid in the second quarter of fiscal 2016. Any future assessments could have a material adverse effect on our business or financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. In addition, compliance with the directives of the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (‘‘DDTC’’) may result in substantial expenses and diversion of management. Any failure to adequately address the directives of DDTC could result in civil fines or suspension or loss of our export privileges, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business or financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. 41 Failure to maintain effective internal controls may cause a loss of investor confidence in the reliability of our financial statements or to cause us to delay filing our periodic reports with the SEC and adversely affect our stock price. The SEC, as directed by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, adopted rules requiring public companies to include a report of management on internal control over financial reporting in their annual reports on Form 10-K that contain an assessment by management of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. In addition, our independent registered public accounting firm must attest to and report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Although we test our internal control over financial reporting in order to ensure compliance with the Section 404 requirements, our failure to maintain adequate internal controls over financial reporting could result in an adverse reaction in the financial marketplace due to a loss of investor confidence in the reliability of our financial statements or a delay in our ability to timely file our periodic reports with the SEC, which ultimately could negatively impact our stock price. Provisions of our charter documents and Delaware law, and our Change-of-Control Severance Plan may have anti-takeover effects that could prevent or delay a change in control. Provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition or make removal of incumbent directors or officers more difficult. These provisions may discourage takeover attempts and bids for our common stock at a premium over the market price. These provisions include: (cid:127) the ability of our Board of Directors to alter our bylaws without stockholder approval; (cid:127) limiting the ability of stockholders to call special meetings; and (cid:127) establishing advance notice requirements for nominations for election to our Board of Directors or for proposing matters that can be acted on by stockholders at stockholder meetings. We are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which prohibits a publicly-held Delaware corporation from engaging in a merger, asset or stock sale or other transaction with an interested stockholder for a period of three years following the date such person became an interested stockholder, unless prior approval of our board of directors is obtained or as otherwise provided. These provisions of Delaware law also may discourage, delay or prevent someone from acquiring or merging with us without obtaining the prior approval of our board of directors, which may cause the market price of our common stock to decline. In addition, we have adopted a change of control severance plan, which provides for the payment of a cash severance benefit to each eligible employee based on the employee’s position. If a change of control occurs, our successor or acquirer will be required to assume and agree to perform all of our obligations under the change of control severance plan which may discourage potential acquirers or result in a lower stock price. ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS Not Applicable. 42 ITEM 2. PROPERTIES Our corporate headquarters is located in Santa Clara, California. At fiscal 2016 year-end, our locations with larger than 10,000 square feet were as follows (all square footage is approximate) (unless otherwise indicated, each property is utilized jointly by our two segments): Description Use Term* Santa Clara, CA . . . . . . . . . . 8.5 acres of land, 200,000 square feet Santa Clara, CA . . . . . . . . . . 90,120 square feet Sunnyvale, CA(1) . . . . . . . . . 24,159 square feet Richmond, CA(2) . . . . . . . . . 37,952 square feet Richmond, CA(2) . . . . . . . . . 30,683 square feet Richmond, CA(2) . . . . . . . . . 11,500 square feet Bloomfield, CT(1) . . . . . . . . . 72,996 square feet East Hanover, NJ(2) . . . . . . . 29,932 square feet Wilsonville, OR(1) . . . . . . . . 41,250 square feet Salem, NH(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . 44,153 square feet Dieburg, Germany . . . . . . . . 32,123 square feet G¨ottingen, Germany(2) . . . . . L¨ubeck, Germany(2) . . . . . . . 14.2 acres of land, several buildings totaling 224,753 square feet 40,944 square feet L¨ubeck, Germany(2) . . . . . . . 22,583 square feet Corporate headquarters, manufacturing, R&D Office Owned Leased through July 2020 Office, manufacturing, Leased through December 2023 R&D Office, manufacturing, Leased through R&D November 2022 Office, manufacturing, Leased through R&D Warehouse February 2019 Leased through November 2017 Office, manufacturing, Leased through December 2017 R&D Office, manufacturing, Leased through R&D Office, manufacturing, Leased through December 2018 R&D Office, manufacturing, Leased through R&D Office January 2025 October 2024 Leased through December 2020 Office, manufacturing, Owned R&D Office, manufacturing, Leased through R&D December 2018 Manufacturing, R&D Leased through October 2018 with option to purchase building L¨ubeck, Germany(2) . . . . . . . 8,095 square feet L¨ubeck, Germany(2) . . . . . . . 7,578 square feet Office, manufacturing, Leased through R&D Warehouse April 2017 Leased through April 2017 Kaiserslautern, Germany(2) . . Glasgow, Scotland(2) . . . . . . . Tokyo, Japan . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33,740 square feet Office, manufacturing, Leased through September 2017 R&D 2 acres of land, 31,600 Office, manufacturing, Owned R&D square feet Office 17,602 square feet Leased through June 2018 43 Description Use Term* Shanghai, China . . . . . . . . . . 11,127 square feet Office Beijing, China . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,739 square feet Office Seoul, South Korea . . . . . . . . 19,119 square feet Office YongIn-Si, South Korea(2) . . . 33,074 square feet Office, manufacturing Kallang Sector, Singapore . . . 39,332 square feet Office, manufacturing Penang, Malaysia . . . . . . . . . 12,519 square feet Office, manufacturing Leased through May 2017 Leased through July 2018 Leased through June 2017 Leased through November 2017 Leased through January 2022 Leased through August 2017 (1) This facility is utilized primarily by our CLC operating segment. (2) This facility is utilized primarily by our SLS operating segment. * We currently plan to renew leases on buildings as they expire. We maintain other sales and service offices under varying leases expiring from 2017 through 2020 in Japan, China, Taiwan, France, Italy, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. We consider our facilities to be both suitable and adequate to provide for current and near term requirements and that the productive capacity in our facilities is substantially being utilized or we have plans to utilize it. ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS We are subject to legal claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business, such as product liability, employment or intellectual property claims, including, but not limited to, the matters described below. On May 14, 2013, IMRA America (‘‘Imra’’) filed a complaint for patent infringement against two of our subsidiaries in the Regional Court of D¨usseldorf, Germany, captioned In re IMRA America Inc. versus Coherent Kaiserslautern GmbH et. al. 4b O 38/13. The complaint alleges that the use of certain of the Company’s lasers infringes upon EP Patent No. 754,103, entitled ‘‘Method For Controlling Configuration of Laser Induced Breakdown and Ablation,’’ issued November 5, 1997. The patent, now expired in all jurisdictions, is owned by the University of Michigan and licensed to Imra. The complaint seeks unspecified compensatory damages, the cost of court proceedings and seeks to permanently enjoin the Company from infringing the patent in the future. Following the filing of the infringement suit, our subsidiaries filed a separate nullity action with the Federal Patent Court in Munich, Germany requesting that the court hold that the Patent was invalid based on prior art. On October 1, 2015, the Federal Patent Court ruled that the German portion of the Patent was invalid. Imra has appealed this decision to the Federal Court of Justice, the highest civil jurisdiction court in Germany. The infringement action is currently stayed pending the outcome of such appeal. Management has made an accrual with respect to this matter and has determined, based on its current knowledge, that the amount or range of reasonably possible losses in excess of the amounts already accrued is not reasonably estimable. Although we do not expect that such legal claims and litigation will ultimately have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows, an adverse result in one or more matters could negatively affect our results in the period in which they occur. The United States and many foreign governments impose tariffs and duties on the import and export of certain products we sell. From time to time our duty calculations and payments are audited by government agencies. During the second quarter of fiscal 2016, we concluded an audit in South 44 Korea for customs duties and value added tax for the period March 2009 to March 2014. We paid $1.6 million related to this matter in the second quarter of fiscal 2016 and have no remaining accrual at October 1, 2016. Income Tax Audits We are subject to taxation and file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and in many state and foreign jurisdictions. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, all years prior to fiscal 2011 are closed. The Company agreed to extend the statutes of limitations for its fiscal 2011 and 2012 U.S. federal tax returns to June 17, 2017 due to an ongoing Advanced Pricing Agreement (‘‘APA’’) between the U.S. and Korea. In March 2016, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued an audit notice and Information Documentation Requests (IDRs) for fiscal 2013. The audit is currently in progress and the statute of limitation was extended to December 31, 2017. In our major foreign jurisdictions and our major state jurisdictions, the years prior to fiscal 2011 and 2012, respectively, are closed to examination. Earlier years in our various jurisdictions may remain open for adjustment to the extent that we have tax attribute carryforwards from those years. In December 2011 and January 2012, three of our German subsidiaries received notices of tax audits for the fiscal years 2006 through 2010. The audits were completed in the third quarter of fiscal 2016. As a result of the settlement, our gross uncertain tax positions decreased by approximately $4.9 million. The net provision impact of the adjustments was immaterial to the consolidated statement of operations. In July 2015 and March 2016, Coherent Kaiserslautern GmbH (formerly Lumera Laser GmbH) received tax audit notices for the fiscal years 2010 to 2014. The audit began in August 2015. We acquired the shares of Lumera Laser GmbH in December 2012 and, pursuant to the terms of the acquisition agreement, we should not have responsibility for any assessments related to the pre-acquisition period. In June, 2016, Coherent Holding GmbH and Coherent Deutschland GmbH each received a tax audit notice for the fiscal years 2011 to 2014. The audit began in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016. Coherent GmbH, Coherent LaserSystems GmbH & Co. KG and Coherent Germany GmbH received audit notices for the period that they were in existence during the fiscal years 2011 through 2014 and the audit work is scheduled to commence in January 2017. We regularly engage in discussions and negotiations with tax authorities regarding tax matters in various jurisdictions and management believes that it has adequately provided reserves for any adjustments that may result from tax examinations. ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES Not applicable. 45 PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES Our common stock is quoted on the NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol ‘‘COHR.’’ The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices for each quarterly period during the past two fiscal years as reported on the Nasdaq Global Select Market. Fiscal 2016 2015 High Low High Low First quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Second quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Third quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fourth quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 68.33 $ 92.58 $ 98.26 $111.63 $52.46 $57.96 $84.11 $89.43 $65.15 $67.97 $68.14 $63.66 $54.53 $54.30 $60.00 $53.09 The number of stockholders of record as of November 28, 2016 was 746. While we paid a cash dividend in fiscal 2013 and may elect to pay dividends in the future, we have no present intention to declare cash dividends. Our line of credit agreement, signed on November 7, 2016, includes certain restrictions on our ability to pay cash dividends. There were no sales of unregistered securities in fiscal 2016. There were no stock repurchases during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016. Refer to Note 11 ‘‘Stock Repurchases’’ of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 15 of this annual report for discussion on repurchases during fiscal 2015 and 2014. 46 COMPANY STOCK PRICE PERFORMANCE The following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total stockholder return, calculated on a dividend reinvestment basis and based on a $100 investment, from October 1, 2011 through October 1, 2016 comparing the return on our common stock with the Russell 2000 Index, the Standard and Poors Technology Index and the Nasdaq Composite Index. The stock price performance shown on the following graph is not necessarily indicative of future price performance. COMPARISON OF FIVE-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN AMONG COHERENT, INC., THE RUSSELL 2000 INDEX, THE S&P TECHNOLOGY INDEX AND THE NASDAQ COMPOSITE INDEX. Comparison of Cumulative Five Year Total Return $300 $250 $200 $150 $100 $50 $0 10/01/11 9/29/12 9/28/13 9/27/14 10/03/15 10/01/16 Coherent, Inc. Russell 2000 Index S&P Technology Index Nasdaq Composite Index 22DEC201620003152 Base Period INDEXED RETURNS Years Ending Company Name / Index 10/1/2011 9/29/2012 9/28/2013 9/27/2014 10/3/2015 10/1/2016 Coherent, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Russell 2000 Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S&P Technology Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nasdaq Composite Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 100 100 100 106.75 131.91 132.41 130.53 145.69 171.62 142.36 160.67 149.54 181.14 182.68 194.05 129.91 182.74 189.68 204.85 262.63 208.43 229.51 234.02 The information contained above under the caption ‘‘Company Stock Price Performance’’ shall not be deemed to be ‘‘soliciting material’’ or to be ‘‘filed’’ with the SEC, nor will such information be incorporated by reference into any future SEC filing except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing. 47 ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA The information set forth below is not necessarily indicative of results of future operations and should be read in conjunction with Item 7. ‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations’’ and the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this annual report. We derived the consolidated statement of operations data for fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of fiscal 2016 and 2015 year-end from our audited consolidated financial statements, and accompanying notes, contained in this annual report. The consolidated statements of operations data for fiscal 2013 and 2012 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 year-end are derived from our consolidated financial statements which are not included in this annual report. Consolidated financial data Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income per share(5): Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shares used in computation(5): Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total assets* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other long-term liabilities* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other data: Cash dividends declared per share . . . . . . . . Fiscal 2016(1) Fiscal 2015(2) Fiscal 2014 Fiscal 2013(3) Fiscal 2012(4) $ 857,385 $ 381,392 87,502 $ (in thousands, except per share data) $794,639 $802,460 $313,390 $335,399 $ 59,106 $ 76,409 $810,126 $322,271 $ 66,355 $769,088 $315,985 $ 62,962 $ $ 3.62 3.58 $ $ 3.09 3.06 $ $ 2.39 2.36 $ $ 2.75 2.70 $ $ 2.67 2.62 24,142 24,415 $1,161,148 $ 48,826 $ 910,828 24,754 24,992 $968,947 $ 49,939 $796,418 24,760 25,076 $999,375 $ 62,407 $819,649 24,138 24,555 $966,478 $ 62,132 $758,518 23,561 24,026 $880,772 $ 55,328 $671,656 $ — $ — $ — $ 1.00 $ — * In November 2015, the FASB issued amended guidance that clarifies that in a classified statement of financial position, an entity shall classify deferred tax liabilities and assets as noncurrent amounts. The new guidance supersedes ASC 740-10-45-5 which required the valuation allowance for a particular tax jurisdiction be allocated between current and noncurrent deferred tax assets for that tax jurisdiction on a pro rata basis. We elected to early adopt the standard retrospectively in fiscal 2016, which resulted in the reclassification of current deferred income tax assets to non-current deferred income tax assets and non-current deferred income tax liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets for fiscal 2016 and 2015. The impact of the reclassifications to deferred tax assets and liabilities for fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 was immaterial. (1) Includes $6.4 million of after tax costs related to the acquisition of Rofin, a $1.4 million after-tax loss on our hedge of our foreign exchange risk related to the commitment of our term loan to finance the acquisition of Rofin, $0.8 million after-tax interest expense on the commitment of our term loan to finance the acquisition of Rofin and a benefit of $1.2 million from the renewal of the R&D tax credit for fiscal 2015. (2) Includes a charge of $1.3 million after tax for the impairment of our investment in SiOnyx, a $1.3 million after-tax charge for an accrual related to an ongoing customs audit, a benefit of $1.1 million from the renewal of the R&D tax credit for fiscal 2014 and $1.3 million gain on our purchase of Tinsley in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015. (3) Includes a tax benefit of $1.4 million from the renewal of the R&D tax credit for fiscal 2012. 48 (4) Includes a charge of $4.3 million after tax related to the write-off of previously acquired intangible assets and inventories, a $2.8 million tax benefit due to decreases in valuation allowances against deferred tax assets and a $1.6 million tax benefit related to the release of tax reserves and related interest as a result of the closure of open tax years. (5) See Note 2, ‘‘Significant Accounting Policies’’ in our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 15 of this annual report for an explanation of the determination of the number of shares used in computing net income (loss) per share. 49 ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included in Item 8, ‘‘Financial Statements and Supplementary Data’’ in this annual report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements, which involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including but not limited to those discussed in Item 1A,‘‘Risk Factors’’ and elsewhere in this annual report. Please see the discussion of forward-looking statements at the beginning of this annual report under ‘‘Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.’’ KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Below is a summary of some of the quantitative performance indicators (as defined below) that are evaluated by management to assess our financial performance. Some of the indicators are non-GAAP measures and should not be considered as an alternative to any other measure for determining operating performance that is calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Bookings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Book-to-bill ratio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net Sales—Specialty Lasers and Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net Sales—Commercial Lasers and Components . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross Profit as a Percentage of Net Sales—Specialty Lasers and 2016 Fiscal 2015 2014 $1,412,096 1.65 $ 631,313 $ 226,072 (Dollars in thousands) $765,174 0.95 $559,593 $242,867 $890,531 1.12 $565,552 $229,087 Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48.3% 45.3% 42.1% Gross Profit as a Percentage of Net Sales—Commercial Lasers and Components . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35.0% 34.9% 33.9% Research and Development Expenses as a Percentage of Net Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income Before Income Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Days Sales Outstanding in Receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Annualized Fourth Quarter Inventory Turns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Capital Spending as a Percentage of Net Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net Income as a Percentage of Net Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjusted EBITDA as a Percentage of Net Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.5% 10.2% 10.0% $ 122,896 $ 105,299 69.6 2.5 5.8% 10.2% 22.6% $ 99,568 $124,458 63.8 3.0 2.8% 9.5% 19.3% $ 79,219 $ 91,379 62.2 2.9 2.9% 7.4% 17.2% Definitions and analysis of these performance indicators are as follows: Bookings and Book-to-Bill Ratio Bookings represent orders received during the current period for products and services. While we generally have not experienced a significant rate of cancellation, bookings are generally cancelable, depending on the notice period, by our customers without substantial penalty and, therefore, we cannot assure all bookings will be converted to net sales. The book-to-bill ratio is calculated as annual bookings divided by annual net sales. This is an indication of the strength of our business but can sometimes be impacted by a single large order or a single large shipment. A ratio greater than 1.0 indicates that demand for our products is greater than what we supply in the year whereas a ratio of less than 1.0 indicates that demand for our products is less than what we supply in the year. 50 Fiscal 2016 bookings increased 85% from bookings in fiscal 2015 and our book-to-bill ratio increased from 0.95 in fiscal 2015 to 1.65 in fiscal 2016. The bookings increase included increases in the microelectronics (170%), materials processing (13%) and OEM components and instrumentation (9%) markets partially offset by decreases in the scientific (3%) market. Although fiscal 2016 bookings increased, bookings in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016 decreased 36% from the third quarter of fiscal 2016, with decreases in the microelectronics, materials processing and OEM components and instrumentation markets partially offset by increases in the scientific market. Fiscal 2015 bookings decreased 14% from bookings in fiscal 2014 and our book-to-bill ratio decreased from 1.12 in fiscal 2014 to 0.95 in fiscal 2015. The bookings decrease included decreases in the microelectronics (19%), OEM components and instrumentation (14%), materials processing (8%) and scientific (2%) markets. Although fiscal 2015 bookings decreased, bookings in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015 increased 16% from the third quarter of fiscal 2015, with increases in all four markets. Backlog represents orders which we expect to be shipped within 12 months and the current portion of service contracts. For a discussion of backlog, see ‘‘RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—BACKLOG’’. Microelectronics Although fiscal 2016 bookings increased 170% from bookings in fiscal 2015 and the book-to-bill ratio for the year was 2.17, bookings in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016 decreased 48% from the third quarter of fiscal 2016 primarily due to decreased systems orders net of higher service orders for the flat panel display market. Flat panel display orders for fiscal 2016 increased 310% from orders in fiscal 2015 primarily due to the timing and mix of order placement by customers with orders received from multiple customers for large format Linebeam systems to be used in flexible organic light-emitting diode (OLED) production. Fourth quarter fiscal 2016 orders were 56% lower than those in the third quarter of fiscal 2016 primarily due to lower orders for Linebeam 1500 and 1000 systems, net of higher service bookings. We expect continued fluctuations in order volumes on a quarterly basis. After building significant flat panel display backlog during the first three quarters of fiscal 2016, in the fourth quarter system orders temporarily returned to a more modest level while flat panel display service orders and revenue were very strong. Some customers are adding capacity to take a larger share of the first wave of OLED adoption while others believe OLED will replace LCDs everywhere from handsets to mobile computing to TVs and signage. These customers are securing capacity to capitalize on these potential trends and, as a result, we have already booked $100 million of new orders in the first quarter of fiscal 2017, which together with our existing backlog fills out most of our existing fiscal 2018 capacity. Advanced packaging (‘‘API’’) orders decreased 29% for the full fiscal year and fourth quarter fiscal 2016 orders decreased 12% from orders in the third quarter of fiscal 2016. The API market continues to demonstrate variability based on project specific activity. There is an increased use of SiPs, or system in package, in the newest smartphones, which increases the number of interconnects and functionality in a smaller footprint. This will maintain pressure on the via drilling market in the next few quarters, but we believe the impact will be temporary since new applications like virtual reality need large amounts of processing power. Orders from semiconductor capital equipment OEMs increased 5% for fiscal 2016 and were 26% higher in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016 compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2016 due to increases in wafer inspection (investments for mobile logic chips) and ink jet nozzle printing applications. Service orders and shipments remain strong due to high utilization rates in most fabs. In addition, we saw favorable inventory corrections at certain customers that resulted in increased sales that we believe are sustainable. We do not anticipate any significant reduction in orders from the recent collapse of two proposed mergers in the semiconductor capital equipment market since they were largely complementary with respect to our ongoing business. 51 OEM Components and Instrumentation Bookings in fiscal 2016 increased 9% from fiscal 2015 and the book-to-bill ratio for the year was 1.08. However, orders in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016 decreased 3% from orders in the third quarter of fiscal 2016 due to lower orders for medical applications. Instrumentation orders decreased 1% for the full fiscal year and fourth quarter fiscal 2016 orders increased 12% compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2016 due to timing of orders. Demand is strong for all submarkets in bioinstrumentation. In flow cytometry, market adoption of the test protocols and the proliferation of desktop instruments from existing and new market entrants are fueling growth. Bookings for confocal microscopy were solid. Our efforts in high-speed gene sequencing are resulting in increasing orders as we secure more design wins. Orders for medical OEM products increased 13% for the full fiscal year 2016, but fourth quarter fiscal 2016 orders decreased 32% compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2016. In spite of the decrease in orders, the medical OEM market remains strong. The medical OEM market is being affected by M&A activity and reorganizations within existing customers, which is causing changes in demand, inventory practices and R&D spending. From our historical experience, we believe these are mostly temporary factors. By contrast, the consumables business is robust, suggesting the number of procedures being performed is stable to increasing. Materials Processing Annual bookings increased 13% from fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2016’s book-to-bill ratio was 1.05. However, bookings in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016 decreased 26% from the prior quarter due to lower orders for metal cutting and engraving applications. Bookings volumes in our materials processing business can vary significantly from quarter to quarter. In spite of the decrease in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, it was a record year for orders and sales in our materials processing business. A number of applications contributed to our success including thin metal cutting in consumer electronics packaging and additive manufacturing as well as short pulse processing for the automotive, medical device and machine tool industries. Scientific and Government Programs Although fiscal 2016 orders decreased 3% from bookings in fiscal 2015, the book-to-bill ratio for the year was 1.03. Orders in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016 increased 37% from the third quarter of fiscal 2016 as the U.S., Asian and European markets delivered a typically strong fourth quarter performance. Our Astrella(cid:4) ultrafast amplifier is the leading solution in the research marketplace based upon performance and unit volumes; bookings were particularly strong in China, where funding for applied physics and physical chemistry is similar to that in the U.S. The Chameleon Discovery(cid:4), our most advanced light source for multiphoton imaging, had record unit and dollar bookings in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016. Net Sales Net sales include sales of lasers, laser tools, related accessories and service. Net sales for fiscal 2016 increased 7% from fiscal 2015. Net sales for fiscal 2015 increased 1% from fiscal 2014. For a description of the reasons for changes in net sales refer to the ‘‘Results of Operations’’ section below. Gross Profit as a Percentage of Net Sales Gross profit as a percentage of net sales (‘‘gross profit percentage’’) is calculated as gross profit for the period divided by net sales for the period. Gross profit percentage for SLS increased to 48.3% in fiscal 2016 from 45.3% in fiscal 2015 and from 42.1% in fiscal 2014. Gross profit percentage for CLC increased to 35.0% in fiscal 2016 from 34.9% in fiscal 2015 and from 33.9% in fiscal 2014. For a description of the reasons for changes in gross profit refer to the ‘‘Results of Operations’’ section below. 52 Research and Development as a Percentage of Net Sales Research and development as a percentage of net sales (‘‘R&D percentage’’) is calculated as research and development expense for the period divided by net sales for the period. Management considers R&D percentage to be an important indicator in managing our business as investing in new technologies is a key to future growth. R&D percentage decreased to 9.5% in fiscal 2016 from 10.2% in fiscal 2015 and 10.0% in fiscal 2014. For a description of the reasons for changes in R&D spending refer to the ‘‘Results of Operations’’ section below. Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities Net cash provided by operating activities shown on our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows primarily represents the excess of cash collected from billings to our customers and other receipts over cash paid to our vendors for expenses and inventory purchases to run our business. We believe that cash flows from operations are an important performance indicator because cash generation over the long term is essential to maintaining a healthy business and providing funds to help fuel growth. For a description of the reasons for changes in Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities refer to the ‘‘Liquidity and Capital Resources’’ section below. Days Sales Outstanding in Receivables We calculate days sales outstanding (‘‘DSO’’) in receivables as net receivables at the end of the period divided by net sales during the period and then multiplied by the number of days in the period, using 360 days for years. DSO in receivables indicates how well we are managing our collection of receivables, with lower DSO in receivables resulting in higher working capital availability. The more money we have tied up in receivables, the less money we have available for research and development, acquisitions, expansion, marketing and other activities to grow our business. Our DSO in receivables for fiscal 2016 increased to 69.6 days from 63.8 days in fiscal 2015. The increase in DSO in receivables is primarily due to a higher concentration of receivables in Asia and Japan where DSOs are typically higher and the unfavorable impact of foreign exchange rates partially offset by a lower concentration of sales in the last month of the fiscal year in all regions. Annualized Fourth Quarter Inventory Turns We calculate annualized fourth quarter inventory turns as cost of sales during the fourth quarter annualized and divided by net inventories at the end of the fourth quarter. This indicates how well we are managing our inventory levels, with higher inventory turns resulting in more working capital availability and a higher return on our investments in inventory. The more money we have tied up in inventory, the less money we have available for research and development, acquisitions, expansion, marketing and other activities to grow our business. Our annualized fourth quarter inventory turns for fiscal 2016 decreased to 2.5 turns from 3.0 turns in fiscal 2015 primarily due to the planned build-up of inventory levels in certain business units, primarily in microelectronics, to support increased demand for our large format Linebeam systems. Capital Spending as a Percentage of Net Sales Capital spending as a percentage of net sales (‘‘capital spending percentage’’) is calculated as capital expenditures for the period divided by net sales for the period. Capital spending percentage indicates the extent to which we are expanding or improving our operations, including investments in technology and equipment. Management monitors capital spending levels as this assists us in measuring our cash flows, net of capital expenditures. Our capital spending percentage increased to 5.8% in fiscal 2016 from 2.8% in fiscal 2015 and 2.9% in fiscal 2014. The fiscal 2016 increase was primarily due to increased investments to expand our manufacturing capacity in G¨ottingen, Germany, upgrade certain of 53 our production facilities in California and New Jersey and higher purchases of production-related assets, partially offset by the impact of higher revenues in fiscal 2016. The fiscal 2015 decrease was primarily due to lower purchases of production-related assets. Adjusted EBITDA as a Percentage of Net Sales We define adjusted EBITDA as operating income adjusted for depreciation, amortization, stock- based compensation, major restructuring costs and certain other non-operating income and expense items, such as costs related to the acquisition of Rofin. Key initiatives to reach our goals for EBITDA improvements include utilization of our Asian manufacturing locations, rationalizing our supply chain and continued leveraging of our infrastructure. We utilize a number of different financial measures, both GAAP and non-GAAP, such as adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of net sales, in analyzing and assessing our overall business performance, for making operating decisions and for forecasting and planning future periods. We consider the use of non-GAAP financial measures helpful in assessing our current financial performance and ongoing operations. While we use non-GAAP financial measures as a tool to enhance our understanding of certain aspects of our financial performance, we do not consider these measures to be a substitute for, or superior to, the information provided by GAAP financial measures. We provide adjusted EBITDA in order to enhance investors’ understanding of our ongoing operations. This measure is used by some investors when assessing our performance. Below is the reconciliation of our net income as a percentage of net sales to our adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of net sales: Fiscal 2015 2014 2016 10.2% 9.5% 7.4% Net income as a percentage of net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1% 2.9% 2.5% Income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.8% 0.1% 0.3% Interest and other income (expense), net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.0% 4.1% 4.6% Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Purchase accounting step up . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —% 0.1% —% Gain on business combination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —% (0.2)% —% Customs audit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —% 0.2% —% 1.1% —% —% Costs related to acquisition of Rofin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Impairment of investment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —% 0.3% —% 2.4% 2.3% 2.4% Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of net sales . . . . . . . . . . . 22.6% 19.3% 17.2% SIGNIFICANT EVENTS Acquisitions and related financing On November 7, 2016, we completed our previously announced acquisition of Rofin pursuant to the Merger Agreement dated March 16, 2016. Rofin is one of the world’s leading developers and manufacturers of high-performance industrial laser sources and laser-based solutions and components. As a condition of the acquisition, we are required to divest ourselves of Rofin’s low power CO2 laser business based in Hull, United Kingdom, and will report this business separately as a discontinued operation until it is divested. The acquisition was an all-cash transaction at a price of $32.50 per share of Rofin common stock. The aggregate consideration paid by us to the former Rofin stockholders was approximately $904.5 million, excluding related transaction fees and expenses. We also paid $15.3 million due to the cancellation of options held by employees of Rofin. We funded the payment of 54 the aggregate consideration with a combination of our available cash on hand and the proceeds from the Euro Term Loan described below. See Note 16, ‘‘Subsequent Events’’ in our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 15 of this annual report for further discussion of the acquisition. On November 7, 2016, we entered into a Credit Agreement (the ‘‘Credit Agreement’’) with Barclays Bank PLC (‘‘Barclays’’), Bank of America, N.A. (‘‘BAML’’) and The Bank of Tokyo- Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. (‘‘MUFG’’). The Credit Agreement provided for a 670.0 million Euro senior secured term loan facility (the ‘‘Euro Term Loan’’) and a $100.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility. On November 7, 2016, the Euro Term Loan was drawn in full and its proceeds were used to finance the acquisition of Rofin and pay related fees and expenses. Also, on November 7, 2016, we used 10.0 million Euro of the capacity under the revolving credit facility for the issuance of a letter of credit. See Note 16, ‘‘Subsequent Events’’ in our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 15 of this annual report for further discussion of the Credit Agreement. In relation to the acquisition of Rofin, we paid Barclays, our financial advisor, a fee of approximately $9.5 million, $1.0 million of which was paid upon delivery of the fairness opinion in the second quarter of fiscal 2016, and was recorded in the selling, general and administrative line of the consolidated statements of operations, and the remaining portion of which was paid upon consummation of the acquisition in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. We also paid Barclays, BAML and MUFG together approximately $17.0 million and $5.6 million for underwriting and upfront fees, respectively, upon the close of the financing on November 7, 2016. See Note 16, ‘‘Subsequent Events’’ in our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 15 of this annual report for further discussion of the completion of the acquisition and issuance of the financing. On July 24, 2015, we acquired certain assets of Raydiance, Inc. (‘‘Raydiance’’) for approximately $5.0 million, excluding transaction costs. Raydiance manufactured complete tools and lasers for ultrafast processing systems and subsystems in the precision micromachining processing market. The Raydiance assets have been included in our Specialty Lasers and Systems segment. On July 27, 2015, we acquired the assets and certain liabilities of the Tinsley Optics (‘‘Tinsley’’) business from L-3 Communications Corporation for approximately $4.3 million, excluding transaction costs. Tinsley is a specialized manufacturer of high precision optical components and subsystems sold primarily in the aerospace and defense industry. Tinsley manufactures the large form factor optics for our excimer laser annealing systems. The Tinsley assets have been included in our Specialty Lasers and Systems segment. On June 8, 2010, we invested $2.0 million in SiOnyx, Inc., a privately-held company. The investment was included in other assets and was being carried on a cost basis. During the third quarter of fiscal 2015 we determined that our investment became other-than temporarily impaired. As a result, we recorded a non-cash charge of $2.0 million to operating expense in our results of operations in the third quarter of fiscal 2015. Stock Repurchases On August 25, 2015, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program to repurchase up to $25.0 million of our outstanding common stock from time to time through August 31, 2016. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, we repurchased and retired 437,534 shares of outstanding common stock under this plan at an average price of $57.14 per share for a total of $25.0 million. On January 21, 2015, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program to repurchase up to $25.0 million of our outstanding common stock from time to time through January 31, 2016. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, we repurchased and retired 430,675 shares of outstanding common stock under this plan at an average price of $58.05 per share for a total of $25.0 million. 55 On July 25, 2014, the Board of Directors authorized a buyback program whereby we were authorized to repurchase up to $25.0 million of our common stock from time to time through July 31, 2015. During the first and second quarters of fiscal 2015, we repurchased and retired 434,114 shares of outstanding common stock at an average price of $57.59 per share for a total of $25.0 million, excluding expenses. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—FISCAL 2016, 2015 AND 2014 Fiscal 2016 and 2014 consisted of 52 weeks. Fiscal 2015 consisted of 53 weeks. Consolidated Summary The following table sets forth, for the years indicated, the percentage of total net sales represented by the line items reflected in our consolidated statement of operations: Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2016 Fiscal 2015 2014 (As a percentage of net sales) 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 55.5% 58.2% 60.6% Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44.5% 41.8% 39.4% Operating expenses: Research and development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selling, general and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gain on business combination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Impairment of investment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.5% 10.2% 10.0% 19.7% 18.7% 19.4% —% (0.2)% —% —% —% 0.2% 0.4% 0.3% 0.4% Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29.6% 29.2% 29.8% Income from operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other income (expense), net 14.9% 12.6% 9.6% (0.6)% (0.2)% 0.4% Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14.3% 12.4% 10.0% 4.1% 2.9% 2.6% Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.2% 9.5% 7.4% Refer to Item 6 ‘‘Selected Financial Data’’ for a description of significant events that impacted the results of operations for fiscal years 2016, 2015 and 2014. Backlog Backlog represents orders which we expect to be shipped within 12 months and the current portion of service contracts. Orders used to compute backlog are generally cancelable and, depending on the notice period, are subject to rescheduling by our customers without substantial penalties. Historically, we have not experienced a significant rate of cancellation or rescheduling, though we cannot guarantee that the rate of cancellations or rescheduling will not increase in the future. We had a backlog of orders shippable within 12 months of $605.3 million at October 1, 2016, including a significant concentration in the flat panel display market (63%) for customers which are primarily located in Asia. 56 Net Sales Market Application The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the amount of net sales and their relative percentages of total net sales by market application (dollars in thousands): Fiscal 2016 Fiscal 2015 Fiscal 2014 Percentage of total net sales Amount Percentage of total net sales Amount Percentage of total net sales Amount Consolidated: Microelectronics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OEM components and instrumentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Materials processing . . . . . . . . . . . Scientific and government programs $454,908 53.1% $406,187 50.6% $384,620 48.4% 161,573 124,011 116,893 18.8% 168,741 14.5% 110,986 13.6% 116,546 21.0% 169,978 13.8% 118,569 14.6% 121,472 21.4% 14.9% 15.3% Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $857,385 100.0% $802,460 100.0% $794,639 100.0% During fiscal 2016, net sales increased by $54.9 million, or 7%, compared to fiscal 2015, including decreases due to the unfavorable impact of foreign exchange rates, with sales increases in the microelectronics, materials processing and scientific and government programs markets partially offset by decreases in the OEM components and instrumentation market. Microelectronics sales increased $48.7 million, or 12%, primarily due to higher shipments for flat panel display annealing systems and higher shipments for semiconductor applications partially offset by lower shipments for advanced packaging applications. Materials processing sales increased $13.0 million, or 12%, during fiscal 2016 primarily due to higher shipments for cutting, marking and other materials processing applications. The increase in scientific and government programs market sales of $0.3 million, or 0%, during fiscal 2016 was primarily due to higher demand for advanced research applications used by university and government research groups. The decrease in the OEM components and instrumentation market of $7.2 million, or 4%, during fiscal 2016 was primarily due to lower shipments for medical and machine vision applications partially offset by higher shipments for military and bio-instrumentation applications. During fiscal 2015, net sales increased by $7.8 million, or 1%, compared to fiscal 2014, with sales increases in the microelectronics market partially offset by decreases in the materials processing, scientific and government programs and OEM components and instrumentation markets. Microelectronics sales increased $21.6 million, or 6%, primarily due to higher shipments for flat panel display annealing systems partially offset by lower shipments for semiconductor and advanced packaging applications. Materials processing sales decreased $7.6 million, or 6%, during fiscal 2015 primarily due to lower shipments for marking, non-metal drilling and non-metal cutting applications. The decrease in scientific and government programs market sales of $4.9 million, or 4%, during fiscal 2015 was primarily due to lower demand for advanced research applications used by university and government research groups in Europe. The decrease in the OEM components and instrumentation market of $1.2 million, or 1%, during fiscal 2015 was primarily due to lower shipments for medical and machine vision applications partially offset by higher shipments for bio-instrumentation and forensic applications, including the impact of the acquisitions of Tinsley and Raydiance assets ($2.0 million). The timing for shipments of our higher average selling price excimer products in the flat panel display market have historically fluctuated and are in the future expected to fluctuate from quarter-to-quarter due to customer scheduling, our ability to manufacture these products and/or availability of critical component parts and supplies. As a result, the timing to convert orders for these products to net sales will likely fluctuate from quarter-to-quarter. 57 Looking at our prior ten years of actual results, excluding a couple of recovery years, our first quarter revenues generally ranged 2% to 12% below the fourth quarter of the prior fiscal year. In fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014, one customer accounted for 13%, 17% and 13% of net sales, respectively. In fiscal 2016, another customer accounted for 16% of net sales. Segments We are organized into two reportable operating segments: Specialty Lasers and Systems (‘‘SLS’’) and Commercial Lasers and Components (‘‘CLC’’). SLS develops and manufactures configurable, advanced-performance products largely serving the microelectronics, scientific research and government programs and OEM components and instrumentation markets. CLC focuses on higher volume products that are offered in set configurations. CLC’s primary markets include materials processing, OEM components and instrumentation and microelectronics. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the amount of net sales and their relative percentages of total net sales by segment (dollars in thousands): Consolidated: Specialty Lasers and Systems (SLS) Commercial Lasers and Fiscal 2016 Fiscal 2015 Fiscal 2014 Percentage of total net sales Amount Percentage of total net sales Amount Percentage of total net sales Amount $631,313 73.6% $559,593 69.7% $565,552 71.2% Components (CLC) . . . . . . . . . . 226,072 26.4% 242,867 30.3% 229,087 28.8% Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $857,385 100.0% $802,460 100.0% $794,639 100.0% Net sales for fiscal 2016 increased $54.9 million, or 7%, compared to fiscal 2015, with increases of $71.7 million, or 13%, in our SLS segment and decreases of $16.8 million, or 7%, in our CLC segment. Both the fiscal 2016 increase in SLS and decrease in CLC segment sales, respectively, included decreases due to the unfavorable impact of foreign exchange rates. Net sales for fiscal 2015 increased $7.8 million, or 1%, compared to fiscal 2014, with increases of $13.8 million, or 6%, in our CLC segment and decreases of $6.0 million, or 1%, in our SLS segment. Both the fiscal 2015 increase and decrease in CLC and SLS segment sales, respectively, included decreases due to the unfavorable impact of foreign exchange rates. The increase in our SLS segment sales in fiscal 2016 was primarily due to higher shipments of flat panel display annealing systems and higher service revenue as well as higher shipments for semiconductor and military applications partially offset by lower shipments for medical and advanced packaging applications. The fiscal 2016 increase includes an increase of $11.3 million, primarily in military and scientific applications, resulting from our acquisitions of Tinsley and Raydiance assets in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015. The decrease in our SLS segment sales in fiscal 2015 was primarily due to lower shipments for medical, semiconductor, bioinstrumentation and advanced packaging applications partially offset by higher shipments of flat panel display annealing systems. The fiscal 2015 decrease includes an increase of $2.0 million, primarily in military applications, resulting from our acquisitions of Tinsley and Raydiance assets. The decrease in our CLC segment sales from fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2016 was primarily due to lower medical and advanced packaging application sales. The increase in our CLC segment sales from fiscal 2014 to fiscal 2015 was primarily due to higher medical, bioinstrumentation and flat panel display application sales. 58 Gross Profit Consolidated Our gross profit rate increased by 2.7% to 44.5% in fiscal 2016 from 41.8% in fiscal 2015 primarily due to favorable product margins (2.2%) resulting from the impact of higher volumes in certain business units (primarily flat panel display applications) and the favorable impact from foreign currency fluctuations (primarily the Euro and Yen) as well as favorable mix in the microelectronics market, particularly for flat panel display applications, net of unfavorable mix in the OEM components and instrumentation market. In addition, the margin also benefited from lower other costs (0.3%) due primarily to an accrual in the third quarter of fiscal 2015 for a customs audit in South Korea and lower inventory charges for excess or obsolete inventory as well as lower warranty costs (0.2%) due to fewer warranty events. Our gross profit rate increased by 2.4% to 41.8% in fiscal 2015 from 39.4% in fiscal 2014 primarily due to favorable product margins (1.2%) resulting from favorable mix in the microelectronics market and the favorable impact from foreign currency fluctuations net of the impact of lower volumes in certain business units. In addition, the margin also benefited from lower warranty costs (0.6%) due to fewer warranty events in both segments, lower other costs (0.5%) due primarily to lower inventory charges for excess or obsolete inventory and lower intangibles amortization (0.1%). Our gross profit rate has been and will continue to be affected by a variety of factors including market and product mix, pricing on volume orders, shipment volumes, our ability to manufacture advanced and more complex products, manufacturing efficiencies, excess and obsolete inventory write- downs, warranty costs, amortization of intangibles, pricing by competitors or suppliers, new product introductions, production volume, customization and reconfiguration of systems, commodity prices and foreign currency fluctuations, particularly the recent volatility of the Euro and a lesser extent, the Japanese Yen and South Korean Won. Specialty Lasers and Systems Our SLS gross profit rate increased by 3.0% to 48.3% in fiscal 2016 from 45.3% in fiscal 2015 primarily due to favorable product margins (2.7%), lower warranty costs (0.2%) due to fewer warranty events and lower intangibles amortization expense (0.1%). The 2.7% product margin improvement resulted from the impact of higher volumes in most business units and the favorable impact from foreign currency fluctuations (primarily the Euro and Yen) as well as favorable mix in the microelectronics market, particularly for flat panel display applications, including favorable service mix net of unfavorable mix in the OEM components and instrumentation market. Our SLS gross profit rate increased by 3.2% to 45.3% in fiscal 2015 from 42.1% in fiscal 2014 primarily due to favorable product margins (1.7%), lower other costs (0.8%) primarily due to lower inventory charges for excess or obsolete inventory net of the amortization of the inventory step up from the Tinsley and Raydiance asset acquisitions, lower warranty costs (0.6%) due to fewer warranty events and lower intangibles amortization expense (0.1%). The 1.7% product margin improvement resulted from favorable product mix in the microelectronics and OEM components and instrumentation markets as well as favorable service mix and the favorable impact from foreign currency fluctuations. Commercial Lasers and Components Our CLC gross profit rate increased by 0.1% to 35.0% in fiscal 2016 from 34.9% in fiscal 2015 primarily due to lower other costs (0.8%) due to lower freight and packaging costs as well as lower inventory charges for excess or obsolete inventory partially offset by unfavorable product margin (0.5%) and higher warranty costs (0.2%) due to more warranty events. The 0.5% product margin deterioration 59 resulted from unfavorable yields and lower volumes in certain business units partially offset by favorable mix in the OEM components and instrumentation and materials processing markets. Our CLC gross profit rate increased by 1.0% to 34.9% in fiscal 2015 from 33.9% in fiscal 2014 primarily due to a favorable product margin (0.5%) and lower warranty costs (0.5%) due to fewer warranty events. The 0.5% product margin improvement resulted from favorable mix in the OEM components and instrumentation and materials processing markets partially offset by unfavorable yields in certain business units. Operating Expenses The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the amount of operating expenses and their relative percentages of total net sales by the line items reflected in our consolidated statement of operations (dollars in thousands): Research and development . . . . . . . Selling, general and administrative . Gain on business combination . . . . Impairment of investment . . . . . . . Amortization of intangible assets . . Amount $ 81,801 169,138 — — 2,839 2016 Fiscal 2015 Percentage of total net sales Amount Percentage of total net sales Amount (Dollars in thousands) 9.5% $ 81,455 19.7% 149,829 (1,316) 2,017 2,667 —% —% 0.4% 10.2% $ 79,070 18.7% 154,030 — (0.2)% — 0.2% 3,424 0.3% 2014 Percentage of total net sales 10.0% 19.4% —% —% 0.4% 29.8% Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . $253,778 29.6% $234,652 29.2% $236,524 Research and development Fiscal 2016 research and development (‘‘R&D’’) expenses increased $0.3 million, or less than 1%, from fiscal 2015, but decreased to 9.5% of sales, compared to 10.2% in fiscal 2015. The $0.3 million increase was primarily due to $2.0 million incremental spending from the asset acquisitions from Tinsley and Raydiance, both of which were acquired in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, $0.3 million higher stock-based compensation expense and $0.3 million higher charges for increases in deferred compensation plan liabilities. The increases were partially offset by $2.3 million lower project spending including the favorable impact of foreign exchange rates, lower spending on labor and materials and higher customer reimbursements. On a segment basis, SLS spending increased $0.7 million primarily due to the asset acquisitions from Tinsley and Raydiance partially offset by lower project spending including the favorable impact of foreign exchange rates. CLC spending decreased $1.4 million primarily due to lower spending on projects and higher customer reimbursements. Corporate and other spending increased $1.0 million primarily due to higher charges for increases in deferred compensation plan liabilities and higher stock-based compensation expense. Fiscal 2015 research and development (‘‘R&D’’) expenses increased $2.4 million, or 3%, from fiscal 2014, and increased to 10.2% from 10.0% of net sales. The $2.4 million increase was primarily due to $2.5 million higher project spending as a result of lower customer reimbursements for development projects and higher spending on various projects net of the favorable impact of foreign exchange rates as well as an increase of $0.6 million from the impact of the acquisitions of Tinsley and Raydiance assets in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015. The increases were partially offset by $0.7 million lower other spending including lower charges for increases in deferred compensation plan liabilities with the related income for increases in deferred compensation assets recorded in other income (expense) and lower stock-based compensation expense. On a segment basis, SLS spending increased 60 $0.8 million primarily due to higher net spending on projects due to lower customer reimbursements and the impact of the acquisitions of Tinsley and Raydiance assets, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, partially offset by the favorable impact of foreign exchange rates. CLC spending increased $2.1 million primarily due to higher spending on projects and lower customer reimbursements. Corporate and other spending decreased $0.5 million due to lower charges for increases in deferred compensation plan liabilities and lower stock-based compensation expense. Selling, general and administrative Fiscal 2016 selling, general and administrative (‘‘SG&A’’) expenses increased $19.3 million, or 13%, from fiscal 2015. The increase was primarily due to a net $8.5 million higher consulting and legal costs related to acquisitions in fiscal 2016 compared to fiscal 2015 (of which $9.8 million was related to the acquisition of Rofin in fiscal 2016) and $6.2 million higher payroll spending primarily due to higher variable compensation and higher sales commissions net of the favorable impact of foreign exchange rates. In addition, the increase includes $1.8 million higher charges for increases in deferred compensation plan liabilities, $1.6 million higher stock-based compensation expense due to (1) a higher average stock price during fiscal 2016, (2) a higher number of restricted stock shares outstanding and (3) the expense related to accounting for the transition agreement of our former CFO, and $1.2 million higher other net variable spending including incremental spending from the asset acquisitions of Tinsley and Raydiance. On a segment basis as compared to the prior year period, SLS segment expenses increased $4.0 million primarily due to higher payroll spending and the impact due to the asset acquisitions from Tinsley and Raydiance net of the favorable impact of foreign exchange rates. CLC spending increased $1.9 million primarily due to higher payroll spending net of the favorable impact of foreign exchange rates. Spending for Corporate and other increased $13.4 million primarily due to higher consulting and legal costs related to acquisitions, higher charges for increases in deferred compensation plan liabilities, higher stock-based compensation expense and higher payroll spending. Fiscal 2015 SG&A expenses decreased $4.2 million, or 3%, from fiscal 2014. The decrease was primarily due to $3.7 million lower charges for increases in deferred compensation plan liabilities with the related income for increases in deferred compensation assets recorded in other income (expense) and $0.7 million lower stock-based compensation expense. The decreases were partially offset by $0.2 million higher other net variable spending due to higher payroll related spending from higher variable compensation, salaries and benefits, higher legal and consulting costs including costs related to acquisitions and higher bad debt expenses partially offset by the favorable impact of foreign exchange rates and lower demo amortization. On a segment basis, SLS segment expenses decreased $1.7 million primarily due to lower variable spending. CLC spending decreased $1.2 million primarily due to lower variable spending. Spending for Corporate and other decreased $1.3 million primarily due to lower charges for increases in deferred compensation plan liabilities and lower stock-based compensation expense partially offset by higher variable spending including $1.3 million of legal and consulting costs related to acquisitions and higher payroll spending. Gain on business combination On July 27, 2015, we acquired the assets and certain liabilities of the Tinsley business from L-3 Communications Corporation for approximately $4.3 million, excluding transaction costs (See Note 3). The purchase price was lower than the fair value of net assets purchased, resulting in a gain of $1.3 million recorded in our consolidated statements of operations for our fiscal year 2015. Impairment of investment On June 8, 2010, we invested $2.0 million in SiOnyx, Inc., a privately-held company. The investment was included in other assets and was being carried on a cost basis. During the third quarter of fiscal 2015 we determined that our investment became other-than temporarily impaired. As a result, 61 we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $2.0 million to operating expense in our results of operations in the third quarter of fiscal 2015. Amortization of intangible assets Amortization of intangible assets increased $0.2 million, or 6%, from fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2016 primarily due to increases due to the write-off of IPR&D of $0.4 million related to our acquisition of Innolight and due to the asset acquisition from Raydiance in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015 partially offset by the completion of amortization of certain intangibles from prior acquisitions. Amortization of intangible assets decreased $0.8 million, or 22%, from fiscal 2014 to fiscal 2015 primarily due to the completion of amortization of certain intangibles from prior acquisitions partially offset by amortization due to the asset acquisition from Raydiance in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015. Other income (expense), net Other income (expense), net, changed by $3.5 million from other expense of $1.2 million in fiscal 2015 to other expense of $4.7 million fiscal 2016. The higher expenses were primarily due to higher net foreign exchange losses ($4.9 million) and $1.3 million higher interest expense primarily for the commitment of our term loan to finance the acquisition of Rofin partially offset by $2.1 million higher gains, net of expenses, on our deferred compensation plan assets and $0.5 million higher interest income due to higher balances of cash and short-term investments. The higher foreign exchange losses were primarily due to (1) higher unhedged exposure in fiscal 2016, (2) a loss of $2.2 million on our hedge of our foreign exchange risk related to the commitment of our term loan to finance the acquisition of Rofin, (3) the significant movement of rates in June 2016 due to the Brexit vote and (4) higher forward points on our hedging contracts. Other income (expense), net, changed by $3.5 million from other income of $2.4 million in fiscal 2014 to other expense of $1.2 million in fiscal 2015. The decrease was primarily due to $4.6 million lower gains, net of expenses, on our deferred compensation plan assets partially offset by lower net foreign currency exchange losses ($0.9 million) and $0.2 million higher interest income due to higher balances of cash and short-term investments. Net foreign currency exchange losses decreased due to higher unhedged exposure in fiscal 2014 and the significant movement of the Japanese Yen versus the Euro in the last month of the first quarter of fiscal 2014. In addition, favorable changes in foreign exchange rates in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 compared to the timing of hedge contracts were partially offset by an unfavorable impact in fiscal 2015 due to the weakening of certain Asian currencies against the U.S. Dollar. Income taxes The effective tax rate on income before income taxes for fiscal 2016 of 28.8% was lower than the statutory rate of 35.0%. This was primarily due to differences related to the benefit of income subject to foreign tax rates that are lower than U.S. tax rates including the Singapore tax exemption, the benefit of foreign tax credits and the benefit of federal research and development tax credits including renewal of the federal research and development tax credits for fiscal 2015. These amounts are partially offset by deemed dividend inclusions under the Subpart F tax rules, stock-based compensation not deductible for tax purposes and limitations on the deductibility of compensation under IRC Section 162(m). The effective tax rate on income before income taxes for fiscal 2015 of 23.3% was lower than the statutory rate of 35.0%. This was primarily due to differences related to the benefit of income subject to foreign tax rates that are lower than U.S. tax rates including South Korea and Singapore tax exemptions, the benefit of foreign tax credits and the benefit of federal research and development tax credits including renewal of the federal research and development tax credits for fiscal 2014. These 62 amounts are partially offset by deemed dividend inclusions under the Subpart F tax rules, stock-based compensation not deductible for tax purposes and limitations on the deductibility of compensation under IRC Section 162(m). The effective tax rate on income before income taxes for fiscal 2014 of 25.4% was lower than the statutory rate of 35.0%. This was primarily due to differences related to the benefit of income subject to foreign tax rates that are lower than U.S. tax rates including South Korea and Singapore tax exemptions and the benefit of foreign tax credits. These amounts are partially offset by deemed dividend inclusions under the Subpart F tax rules, stock-based compensation not deductible for tax purposes and limitations on the deductibility of compensation under IRC Section 162(m). During fiscal 2016, we increased our valuation allowance on deferred tax assets by $2.1 million to $17.6 million primarily due to the increase in California and other states research and development tax credits which are not expected to be recognized. During fiscal 2015, we increased our valuation allowance on deferred tax assets by $1.2 million to $15.6 million primarily due to the reduced ability to utilize California and other states research and development tax credits. In making the determination to record the valuation allowance, management considered the likelihood of future taxable income and feasible and prudent tax planning strategies to realize deferred tax assets. In the future, if we determine that we expect to realize deferred tax assets, an adjustment to the valuation allowance will affect income in the period such determination is made. In October 2016, Coherent Singapore received an amended Pioneer Status tax exemption from the Singapore authorities effective from fiscal 2012 through fiscal 2021. The tax holiday continues to be conditional upon our meeting certain revenue, business spending and employment thresholds. The impact of this tax exemption decreased Singapore income taxes by approximately $0.7 million in fiscal 2016. There are no tax benefits for fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014 due to the utilization of net operating loss. FINANCIAL CONDITION Liquidity and capital resources At October 1, 2016, we had assets classified as cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments, in an aggregate amount of $400.0 million, compared to $325.5 million at October 3, 2015. At October 1, 2016, approximately $331.0 million of this cash and securities was held in certain of our foreign subsidiaries, $93.1 million of which was denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. At October 1, 2016, we had approximately $313.8 million of cash held by foreign subsidiaries where we intend to permanently reinvest our accumulated earnings in these entities and our current plans do not demonstrate a need for these funds to support our domestic operations. If, however, a portion of these funds are needed for and distributed to our operations in the United States, we may be subject to additional U.S. income taxes and foreign withholding taxes. An exception to U.S. taxation may be the repatriation of foreign funds that had been previously taxed in the U.S. as Subpart F income. The amount of the U.S. and foreign taxes due would depend on the amount and manner of repatriation, as well as the location from where the funds are repatriated. We actively monitor the third-party depository institutions that hold these assets, primarily focusing on the safety of principal and secondarily maximizing yield on these assets. We diversify our cash and cash equivalents and investments among various financial institutions, money market funds, sovereign debt and other securities in order to reduce our exposure should any one of these financial institutions or financial instruments fail or encounter difficulties. To date, we have not experienced any material loss or lack of access to our invested cash, cash equivalents or short-term investments. However, we can provide no assurances that access to our invested cash, cash equivalents or short-term investments will not be impacted by adverse conditions in the financial markets. In the first quarter of fiscal 2017, we spent a significant portion of our foreign funds on the Rofin acquisition. We did not repatriate foreign funds to 63 our domestic operations to fund this acquisition. We expect to have adequate foreign funds in the future to service the acquisition debt and do not anticipate any repatriation of foreign funds to operate our domestic business. In the second quarter of fiscal 2016, the first quarter of fiscal 2016, the second quarter of fiscal 2015 and the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, we converted $22.6 million, $33.0 million, $42.3 million and $62.7 million, respectively, of cash and securities held in certain of our foreign subsidiaries to U.S. dollars and invested those funds within a European subsidiary whose functional currency is the U.S. dollar. At October 1, 2016, this subsidiary had $226.8 million of U.S. dollar denominated investments primarily in money market funds and commercial paper. Accordingly, there is no translation expense arising from this entity holding U.S. dollar denominated investments. The converted funds are not intended to be repatriated to the U.S. and no U.S. tax was triggered on the transfer of these funds to the European subsidiary. See ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK below for more information about risks and trends related to foreign currencies. Sources and Uses of Cash Historically, our primary source of cash has been provided by operations. Other sources of cash in the past three fiscal years include proceeds received from the sale of our stock through our employee stock purchase plan as well as borrowings under our domestic line of credit. Our historical uses of cash have primarily been for the repurchase of our common stock, capital expenditures and acquisitions of businesses and technologies. Supplemental information pertaining to our historical sources and uses of cash is presented as follows and should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and notes thereto (in thousands): 2016 Fiscal 2015 Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . Sales of shares under employee stock plans . . . . . . Repurchase of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired . . . . Short-term borrowings, net of repayments . . . . . . . Debt issuance costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $105,299 7,849 $124,458 7,308 — (75,027) (22,163) (9,300) — — (49,327) — 20,000 (5,202) 2014 $ 91,379 10,685 — (23,390) — 22 — Net cash provided by operating activities decreased by $19.2 million in fiscal 2016 compared to fiscal 2015 and increased by $33.1 million in fiscal 2015 compared to fiscal 2014. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2016 was primarily due to lower cash flows from the timing of shipments of large systems from inventory and lower cash flows from accounts receivable partially offset by higher net income and higher accrued payroll and accounts payable balances. The increase in cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2015 was primarily due to higher net income and higher cash flows from the timing of shipments of large systems from inventory partially offset by lower cash flows from prepaid income taxes and accounts receivable. We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and short term investments combined with cash to be provided by operating activities, amounts available under our revolving credit facility will be adequate to cover our working capital needs and planned capital expenditures for at least the next 12 months to the extent such items are known or are reasonably determinable based on current business and market conditions. However, we may elect to finance certain of our capital expenditure requirements through other sources of capital. We continue to follow our strategy to further strengthen our financial position by using available cash flow to fund operations. 64 We intend to continue pursuing acquisition opportunities at valuations we believe are reasonable based upon market conditions. However, we cannot accurately predict the timing, size and success of our acquisition efforts or our associated potential capital commitments. Furthermore, we cannot assure you that we will be able to acquire businesses on terms acceptable to us. We expect to fund future acquisitions through additional borrowings (as in our acquisition of Rofin), existing cash balances and cash flows from operations. If required, we will consider the issuance of securities. The extent to which we will be willing or able to use our common stock to make acquisitions will depend on its market value at the time and the willingness of potential sellers to accept it as full or partial payment. On November 7, 2016, we entered into a Credit Agreement by and among us, Coherent Holding GmbH, as borrower (the ‘‘Borrower’’), and certain of our direct and indirect subsidiaries from time to time party thereto, as guarantors, the lenders from time to time party thereto, Barclays Bank PLC, as administrative agent and L/C Issuer, Bank of America, N.A., as L/C Issuer, and The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., as L/C Issuer. The Credit Agreement provided for a 670.0 million Euro senior secured term loan facility (the ‘‘Euro Term Loan’’) and a $100.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility (‘‘Revolving Credit Facility’’) with a $30.0 million letter of credit sublimit and $10.0 million swing line sublimit. We may increase the aggregate revolving commitments or borrow incremental term loans in an aggregate principal amount of up to $150.0 million, subject to certain conditions, including obtaining additional commitments from the lenders then party to the Credit Agreement or new lenders. On November 7, 2016, we borrowed the full 670.0 million Euro under the Euro Term Loan and its proceeds were used to finance the acquisition of Rofin and pay related fees and expenses. Also, on November 7, 2016, we used 10.0 million Euro of the $100.0 million capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility for the issuance of a letter of credit; the remainder of the Revolving Credit Facility is available. We expect to use future loans under the Revolving Credit Facility, if any, for general corporate purposes. The Credit Agreement replaces our existing $50.0 million Credit Agreement with Union Bank of California. Loans under the Credit Agreement bear interest, at the Borrower’s option, at a rate equal to either (i) the London interbank offered rate (the ‘‘Eurocurrency Rate’’) or (ii) a base rate (the ‘‘Base Rate’’) equal to the highest of (x) the federal funds rate, plus 0.50%, (y) the prime rate then in effect and (z) the Eurocurrency Rate for loans denominated in U.S. dollars applicable to a one-month interest period, plus 1.0%, in each case, plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin for term loans borrowed as Eurocurrency Rate loans, is 3.50% initially, and following the first anniversary of the Closing Date ranges from 3.00% to 3.50% depending on the consolidated total gross leverage ratio at the time of determination. For term loans borrowed as Base Rate Loans, the applicable margin initially is 2.50%, and following the first anniversary of the Closing Date ranges from 2.00% to 2.50% depending upon the consolidated total gross leverage ratio at the time of determination. The applicable margin for revolving loans borrowed as Eurocurrency Rate Loans, ranges from 3.75% to 4.25%, and for revolving loans borrowed as Base Rate Loans, ranges from 2.75% to 3.25%, in each case, based on the consolidated total gross leverage ratio at the time of determination. Interest on Base Rate Loans is payable quarterly in arrears. Interest on Eurocurrency Rate Loans is payable at the end of the applicable interest period. Interest periods for Eurocurrency Rate loans may be, at the Borrower’s option, one, two, three or six months. The Credit Agreement requires the Borrower to make scheduled quarterly payments on the Euro Term Loan of 0.25% of the original principal amount of the Euro Term Loan, with any remaining principal payable at maturity. A commitment fee accrues on any unused portion of the revolving loan commitments under the Credit Agreement at a rate of 0.375% or 0.5% depending on the consolidated total gross leverage ratio at any time of determination. The Borrower is also obligated to pay other customary fees for a credit facility of this size and type. The Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative covenants, including covenants regarding the payment of taxes and other obligations, maintenance of insurance, reporting requirements and 65 compliance with applicable laws and regulations, and negative covenants, including covenants limiting the ability of us and our subsidiaries to, among other things, incur debt, grant liens, make investments, make certain restricted payments, transact with affiliates, and sell assets. The Credit Agreement also requires us and our subsidiaries to maintain a senior secured net leverage ratio as of the last day of each fiscal quarter of less of than or equal to 3.50 to 1.00. The Credit Agreement contains customary events of default that include, among other things, payment defaults, cross defaults with certain other indebtedness, violation of covenants, inaccuracy of representations and warranties in any material respect, change in control of us and the Borrower, judgment defaults, and bankruptcy and insolvency events. If an event of default exists, the lenders may require the immediate payment of all Obligations, as defined in the Credit Agreement, and may exercise certain other rights and remedies provided for under the Credit Agreement, the other loan documents and applicable law. The acceleration of such obligations is automatic upon the occurrence of a bankruptcy and insolvency event of default. The aggregate consideration paid by us to the former Rofin stockholders was approximately $904.5 million, excluding related transaction fees and expenses. We also paid $15.3 million due to the cancellation of options held by employees of Rofin. We paid $5.2 million of debt issuance costs in fiscal 2016 and expect to pay approximately $25.0 million to $30.0 million of debt issuance costs in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, and the first quarter of fiscal 2017, we recorded an interest charge of $1.1 million and $2.7 million, respectively, in other income (expense) in our consolidated statement of operations related to the debt financing commitment. In relation to the acquisition of Rofin, we paid Barclays, our financial advisor, a fee of approximately $9.5 million, $1.0 million of which was paid upon delivery of the fairness opinion in the second quarter of fiscal 2016, and was recorded as SG&A expense, and the remaining portion of which was paid upon consummation of the acquisition in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. Additional sources of cash available to us were domestic and international currency lines of credit and bank credit facilities totaling $63.2 million as of October 1, 2016, of which $40.5 million was unused and available. These unsecured international credit facilities were used in Europe and Japan during fiscal 2016. As of October 1, 2016, we had utilized $1.6 million of the international credit facilities as guarantees. Our domestic line of credit consisted of a $50.0 million unsecured revolving credit account, under which we had drawn $20.0 million and used $1.1 million for letters of credit as of October 1, 2016. On November 4, 2016, we repaid the outstanding balance, plus accrued interest, on our domestic line of credit and terminated the credit facility. In fiscal 2015, under plans authorized by the Board of Directors, we repurchased and retired 1,302,323 shares of outstanding common stock at an average price of $57.59 per share for a total of $75.0 million. Our ratio of current assets to current liabilities was 4.0:1 at October 1, 2016, compared to 5.3:1 at October 3, 2015. The decrease in our ratio is primarily due to increases in other current liabilities, short-term borrowings, taxes payable and accounts payable partially offset by increases in cash and short-term investments, inventories, accounts receivable and prepaid expenses and other assets. Our cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and working capital are as follows (in thousands): Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Short-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Working capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $354,347 45,606 614,145 $130,607 194,908 530,093 Fiscal 2016 2015 66 Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements We have no off-balance sheet arrangements as defined by Regulation S-K of the Securities Act of 1933. The following summarizes our contractual obligations at October 1, 2016 and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods (in thousands): Operating lease payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Asset retirement obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . Purchase commitments for inventory . . . . . . . Purchase obligations-other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total $ 39,854 3,086 73,736 12,165 Less than 1 year $11,548 — 73,721 10,846 $15,470 1,913 15 1,319 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $128,841 $96,115 $18,717 More than 5 years $5,125 1,072 — — $6,197 $7,711 101 — — $7,812 1 to 3 years 3 to 5 years Because of the uncertainty as to the timing of such payments, we have excluded cash payments related to our contractual obligations for our deferred compensation plans aggregating $30.0 million at October 1, 2016. As of October 1, 2016, we recorded gross unrecognized tax benefits of $20.6 million including gross interest and penalties of $0.2 million. As of October 3, 2015, we recorded gross unrecognized tax benefits of $24.3 million including gross interest and penalties of $1.8 million. Both gross unrecognized tax benefits and gross interest and penalties are classified as non-current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet. At this time, we are unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate of the timing of payments in individual years due to uncertainties in the timing of tax audit outcomes. As a result, these amounts are not included in the table above. Changes in financial condition Cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2016 was $105.3 million, which included net income of $87.5 million, depreciation and amortization of $34.4 million, stock-based compensation expense of $20.2 million and $0.9 million other, partially offset by cash used by operating assets and liabilities of $27.9 million (primarily increases in inventories net of increases in accrued payroll and deferred income) and increases in net deferred tax assets of $9.8 million. Cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2015 was $124.5 million, which included net income of $76.4 million, depreciation and amortization of $33.1 million, stock-based compensation expense of $18.2 million, the impairment of our investment in SiOnyx of $2.0 million, decreases in net deferred tax assets of $0.8 million and $0.6 million other, partially offset by cash used by operating assets and liabilities of $5.3 million and the net effect of the gain from acquisition of Tinsley asset of $1.3 million. Cash provided by investing activities in fiscal 2016 of $103.4 million included $152.2 million net sales and maturities of available-for-sale securities partially offset by $48.8 million, net, used to acquire property and equipment, purchase and upgrade buildings, net of proceeds from dispositions. Cash provided by investing activities in fiscal 2015 of $3.2 million included $33.5 million net sales and maturities of available-for-sale securities partially offset by $21.0 million, net, used to acquire property and equipment and improve buildings net of proceeds from dispositions and $9.3 million used to acquire Tinsley and Raydiance assets. Cash provided by financing activities in fiscal 2016 was $17.2 million, which included $20.0 million net borrowings, and $7.8 million generated from our employee stock option and purchase plans partially offset by $5.4 million outflows due to net settlement of restricted stock and $5.2 million of debt issuance costs. Cash used in financing activities in fiscal 2015 was $73.0 million, which included $75.0 million repurchases of common stock and $5.3 million outflows due to net settlement of 67 restricted stock partially offset by $7.3 million generated from our employee stock option and purchase plans. Changes in exchange rates in fiscal 2016 resulted in a decrease in cash balances of $2.2 million. Changes in exchange rates in fiscal 2015 resulted in a decrease in cash balances of $15.2 million. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS See Note 2. ‘‘Significant Accounting Policies’’ in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a full description of recent accounting pronouncements, including the respective dates of adoption or expected adoption and effects on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows. APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. We have identified the following as the items that require the most significant judgment and often involve complex estimation: revenue recognition, accounting for long-lived assets (including goodwill and intangible assets), inventory valuation, warranty reserves, stock-based compensation and accounting for income taxes. Revenue Recognition We recognize revenue when all four revenue recognition criteria have been met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the product has been delivered or the service has been rendered, the price is fixed or determinable and collection is probable. Revenue from product sales is recorded when all of the foregoing conditions are met and risk of loss and title passes to the customer. Our products typically include a warranty and the estimated cost of product warranty claims (based on historical experience) is recorded at the time the sale is recognized. Sales to customers are generally not subject to any price protection or return rights. The majority of our sales are made to original equipment manufacturers (‘‘OEMs’’), distributors, representatives and end-users in the non-scientific market. Sales made to these customers do not require installation of the products by us and are not subject to other post-delivery obligations, except in occasional instances where we have agreed to perform installation or provide training. In those instances, we defer revenue related to installation services or training until these services have been rendered. We allocate revenue from multiple element arrangements to the various elements based upon fair values or a selling price hierarchy, as more fully described in Note 2, ‘‘Significant Accounting Policies—Revenue Recognition,’’ in our consolidated financial statements. Should changes in conditions cause management to determine these criteria are not met for certain future transactions, revenue recognized for any reporting period could be adversely affected. Failure to obtain anticipated orders due to delays or cancellations of orders could have a material adverse effect on our revenue. In addition, pressures from customers to reduce our prices or to modify our existing sales terms may have a material adverse effect on our revenue in future periods. Our sales to distributors, representatives and end-user customers typically do not have customer acceptance provisions and only certain of our sales to OEM customers and integrators have customer acceptance provisions. Customer acceptance is generally limited to performance under our published 68 product specifications. For the few product sales that have customer acceptance provisions because of higher than published specifications, (1) the products are tested and accepted by the customer at our site or the customer accepts the results of our testing program prior to shipment to the customer, or (2) the revenue is deferred until customer acceptance occurs. Sales to end-users in the scientific market typically require installation and, thus, involve post-delivery obligations; however our post-delivery installation obligations are not essential to the functionality of our products. We defer revenue related to installation services until completion of these services. For most products, training is not provided; therefore, no post-delivery training obligation exists. However, when training is provided to our customers, it is typically priced separately and recognized as revenue as these services are provided. For multiple element arrangements which include extended maintenance contracts, we allocate and defer the amount of consideration equal to the separately stated price and recognize revenue on a straight-line basis over the contract period. Long-Lived Assets and Goodwill We evaluate long-lived assets and amortizable intangible assets whenever events or changes in business circumstances or our planned use of assets indicate that their carrying amounts may not be fully recoverable or that their useful lives are no longer appropriate. Reviews are performed to determine whether the carrying values of the assets are impaired based on comparison to the undiscounted expected future cash flows identifiable to such long-lived and amortizable intangible assets. If the comparison indicates that impairment exists, the impaired asset is written down to its fair value. We have determined that our reporting units are the same as our operating segments as each constitutes a business for which discrete financial information is available and for which segment management regularly reviews the operating results. We make this determination in a manner consistent with how the operating segments are managed. Based on this analysis, we have identified two reporting units which are our reportable segments: SLS and CLC. Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis and between annual tests in certain circumstances, and written down when impaired (see Note 7 ‘‘Goodwill and Intangible Assets’’ in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). We generally perform our annual impairment tests during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year using the opening balance sheet as of the first day of the fourth fiscal quarter, with any resulting impairment recorded in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year. In fiscal 2014, 2015 and 2016, we conducted a qualitative assessment of the goodwill in the SLS reporting unit during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year using the opening balance sheet as of the first day of the fourth quarter and concluded that it was more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded its carrying amount. In assessing the qualitative factors, we considered the impact of these key factors: macroeconomic conditions, fluctuations in foreign currency, market and industry conditions, our operating and competitive environment, regulatory and political developments, the overall financial performance of our reporting units including cost factors and budgeted-to-actual revenue results. We also considered our market capitalization, stock price performance and the significant excess calculated in the prior year between estimated fair value and the carrying value of SLS. Based on our assessment, goodwill in the SLS reporting unit was not impaired as of the first day of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, 2015 or 2016. As such, it was not necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test at that time in any of those fiscal years. For our CLC reporting unit we elected to bypass the qualitative assessment in fiscal 2014, 2015 and 2016 and proceeded directly to performing the first step of goodwill impairment. Accordingly, we 69 performed the Step 1 test during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014. We determined the fair value of the reporting unit for the Step 1 test using a 50-50% weighting of the Income (discounted cash flow) approach and Market (market comparable) approach. The Income approach utilizes the discounted cash flow model to provide an estimation of fair value based on the cash flows that a business expects to generate. These cash flows are based on forecasts developed internally by management which are then discounted at an after tax rate of return required by equity and debt market participants of a business enterprise. This rate of return or cost of capital is weighted based on the capitalization of comparable companies. The Market approach determines fair value by comparing the reporting units to comparable companies in similar lines of business that are publicly traded. Total Enterprise Value (TEV) multiples such as TEV to revenues and TEV to earnings (if applicable) before interest and taxes of the publicly traded companies are calculated. These multiples are then applied to the reporting unit’s operating results to obtain an estimate of fair value. Each of these two approaches captures aspects of value in each reporting unit. The Income approach captures our expected future performance, and the Market approach captures how investors view the reporting units through other competitors. We believe these valuation approaches are proven valuation techniques and methodologies for our industry and are widely accepted by investors. As neither was perceived by us to deliver any greater indication of value than the other, and neither approach individually computed a fair value less than the carrying value of the segment, we weighted each of the approaches equally. Management completed and reviewed the results of the Step 1 analysis and concluded that a Step 2 analysis was not required as the estimated fair value of the CLC reporting unit was substantially in excess of its carrying value. Between the completion of that testing and the end of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, we noted no indications of impairment or triggering events for either reporting unit to cause us to review goodwill for potential impairment. At October 1, 2016, we had $101.5 million of goodwill ($95.1 million SLS and $6.4 million in CLC), $13.9 million of purchased intangible assets and $127.4 million of property and equipment on our consolidated balance sheet. Inventory Valuation We record our inventory at the lower of cost (computed on a first-in, first-out basis) or market. We write-down our inventory to its estimated market value based on assumptions about future demand and market conditions. Inventory write-downs are generally recorded within guidelines set by management when the inventory for a device exceeds 12 months of its demand or when management has deemed parts are no longer active or useful. If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs may be required which could materially affect our future results of operations. Due to rapidly changing forecasts and orders, additional write-downs for excess or obsolete inventory, while not currently expected, could be required in the future. In the event that alternative future uses of fully written down inventories are identified, we may experience better than normal profit margins when such inventory is sold. Differences between actual results and previous estimates of excess and obsolete inventory could materially affect our future results of operations. We write-down our demo inventory by amortizing the cost of demo inventory over a twenty month period starting from the fourth month after such inventory is placed in service. Warranty Reserves We provide warranties on the majority of our product sales and allowances for estimated warranty costs are recorded during the period of sale. The determination of such allowances requires us to make estimates of product return rates and expected costs to repair or replace the products under warranty. We currently establish warranty reserves based on historical warranty costs for each product line. The weighted average warranty period covered is approximately 15 months. If actual return rates and/or 70 repair and replacement costs differ significantly from our estimates, adjustments to cost of sales may be required in future periods. Stock-Based Compensation We account for stock-based compensation using fair value. We estimate the fair value of performance restricted stock units granted using a Monte Carlo simulation model. We use historical data to estimate pre-vesting option forfeitures and record stock-based compensation expense only for those awards that are expected to vest. We value service-based restricted stock units using the intrinsic value method and amortize the value on a straight-line basis over the restriction period. We value performance restricted stock units using a Monte Carlo simulation model and amortize the value over the performance period, with no adjustment in future periods, based upon the actual shareholder return over the performance period. U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (‘‘GAAP’’) requires the use of option pricing models that were not developed for use in valuing employee stock options. The Black-Scholes option- pricing model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of short-lived exchange traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option-pricing models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the options expected life, the expected price volatility of the underlying stock and an estimate of expected forfeitures. Our computation of expected volatility considers historical volatility and market-based implied volatility. Our estimate of expected forfeitures is based on historical employee data and could differ from actual forfeitures. See Note 12 ‘‘Employee Stock Award and Benefit Plans’’ in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of our stock-based employee compensation plans and the assumptions we use to calculate the fair value of stock-based employee compensation. Income Taxes As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our income tax provision (benefit) in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves us estimating our current income tax provision (benefit) together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our consolidated balance sheets. We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to an amount that more likely than not will be realized. While we have considered future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance, in the event we were to determine that we would be able to realize our deferred tax assets in the future in excess of our net recorded amount, an adjustment to the allowance for the deferred tax asset would increase income in the period such determination was made. Likewise, should we determine that we would not be able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax asset in the future, an adjustment to the valuation allowance for the deferred tax asset would be charged to income in the period such determination was made. During fiscal 2016, we increased our valuation allowance on deferred tax assets by $2.1 million to $17.6 million, primarily due to the increase in California and certain state research and development tax credits, which are not expected to be recognized. The Company had U.S. federal deferred tax assets related to research and development credits, foreign tax credits and other tax attributes that can be used to offset federal taxable income in future periods. These credit carryforwards will expire if they are not used within certain time periods. As of October 1, 2016, management determined that there is sufficient positive evidence to conclude that it is more likely than not sufficient taxable income will exist in the future allowing us to recognize these deferred tax assets. It is possible that some or all these attributes could ultimately expire unused. If facts and circumstances change in the future, 71 management may determine at that time a valuation allowance is necessary. A valuation allowance would materially increase our tax expense in the period applied and would adversely affect our results of operations and statement of financial condition. Changes in the Company’s underlying facts or circumstances, such as the impact of the Rofin-Sinar merger, will be assessed as they occur and the Company will re-evaluate its position accordingly. Federal and state income taxes have not been provided on a portion of the unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries because such earnings are intended to be permanently reinvested. The total amount of unremitted earnings (including accumulated translation adjustments) of foreign subsidiaries for which we have not yet recorded federal and state income taxes was approximately $574.0 million at fiscal 2016 year-end. The amount of federal and state income taxes that would be payable upon repatriation of such earnings is not practicably determinable. We have not, nor do we anticipate the need to, repatriate funds to the United States to satisfy domestic liquidity needs arising in the ordinary course of business. ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK Market risk disclosures We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. Interest rate sensitivity A portion of our investment portfolio is composed of fixed income securities. These securities are subject to interest rate risk and will fall in value if market interest rates increase. If interest rates were to increase immediately (whether due to changes in overall market rates or credit worthiness of the issuers of our individual securities) and uniformly by 10% from levels at fiscal 2016 year-end, the fair value of the portfolio, based on quoted market prices in active markets involving similar assets, would decline by an immaterial amount due to their short-term maturities. We have the ability to generally hold our fixed income investments until maturity and therefore we would not expect our operating results or cash flows to be affected to any significant degree by the effect of a sudden change in market interest rates on our securities portfolio. If necessary, we may sell short-term investments prior to maturity to meet our liquidity needs. At fiscal 2016 year-end, the fair value of our available-for-sale debt securities was $25.1 million, all of which was classified as short-term investments. There were no gross unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities at fiscal 2016 year-end. At fiscal 2015 year-end, the fair value of our available-for-sale debt securities was $178.4 million, all of which was classified as short-term investments. Gross unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities were $1.1 million and $(2,000), respectively, at fiscal 2015 year-end. Foreign currency exchange risk We maintain operations in various countries outside of the United States and have foreign subsidiaries that manufacture and sell our products in various global markets. The majority of our sales are transacted in U.S. dollars. However, we do generate revenues in other currencies, primarily the Euro, the Japanese Yen, the South Korean Won and the Chinese RMB. Additionally, we have operations in different countries around the world with costs incurred in other local currencies, such as British Pound Sterling, Singapore Dollars and Malaysian Ringgit. As a result, our earnings, cash flows and cash balances are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. For example, we have significant manufacturing operations in Europe so that a weakening Euro is advantageous to our financial results. We attempt to limit these exposures through financial market instruments. We utilize derivative instruments, primarily forward contracts with maturities of two months or less, to manage 72 our exposure associated with anticipated cash flows and net asset and liability positions denominated in foreign currencies. Gains and losses on the forward contracts are mitigated by gains and losses on the underlying instruments. We do not use derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. On occasion, we enter into currency forward exchange contracts to hedge specific anticipated foreign currency denominated transactions generally expected to occur within the next 12 months. These cash flow hedges are designated for hedge accounting treatment and gains and losses on these contracts are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholder’s equity and reclassified into earnings at the time that the related transactions being hedged are recognized in earnings. See Note 6 ‘‘Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities’’. On August 1, 2016, we purchased forward contracts totaling 670.0 million Euro, with a value date of November 30, 2016, to limit our foreign exchange risk related to the commitment of our term loan (denominated in Euros) in an amount of the Euro equivalent of $750.0 million to finance the U.S. dollar payment for the acquisition of Rofin. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, we recognized an unrealized loss of $2.2 million on these hedges. Subsequent to October 1, 2016, we settled these hedges at a net gain of $3.1 million, resulting in a realized gain of $5.3 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. See Note 6 ‘‘Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities’’ to our consolidated financial statements in Part IV of this report. We do not anticipate any material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows resulting from the use of these instruments. There can be no assurance that these strategies will be effective or that transaction losses can be minimized or forecasted accurately. While we model currency valuations and fluctuations, these may not ultimately be accurate. If a financial counterparty to any of our hedging arrangements experiences financial difficulties or is otherwise unable to honor the terms of the foreign currency hedge, we may experience material financial losses. In the current economic environment, the risk of failure of a financial party remains high. At October 1, 2016, approximately $331.0 million of our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments were held outside the U.S. in certain of our foreign operations, $93.1 million of which was denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. See Note 16, ‘‘Subsequent Events’’ in our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 15 of this annual report for further discussion of the completion of our acquisition of Rofin and the use of cash to finance the acquisition. A hypothetical 10% change in foreign currency rates on our forward contracts would not have a material impact on our results of operations, cash flows or financial position. The following table provides information about our foreign exchange forward contracts at October 1, 2016. The table presents the weighted average contractual foreign currency exchange rates, the value of the contracts in U.S. dollars at the contract exchange rate as of the contract maturity date and fair value. The U.S. fair value represents the fair value of the contracts valued at October 1, 2016 rates. Forward contracts to sell (buy) foreign currencies (in thousands, except contract rates): Average Contract Rate U.S. Notional Contract Value U.S. Fair Value Non-Designated—For US Dollars: Euro . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Japanese Yen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . South Korean Won . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chinese RMB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Singaporean Dollar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Malaysian Ringgit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.1202 102.1105 1,057.7555 6.7001 1.3615 4.0498 $659,346 $ 36,450 $ 6,681 $ 25,237 $ (6,033) 1,775 $ $2,072 $ 343 $ (261) 91 $ 4 $ $ (38) 73 ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA See Item 15-(a) for an index to the Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Financial Information, which are attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. The financial statements and notes thereto can be found beginning on page 89 of this annual report. ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE Not applicable. 74 ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES Management’s Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures We have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report (‘‘Evaluation Date’’). The controls evaluation was conducted under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded as of the Evaluation Date that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in providing reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company. Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of October 1, 2016, utilizing the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (‘‘COSO’’) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013). Based on the assessment by management, we determined that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of October 1, 2016. The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of October 1, 2016 has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears below. Inherent Limitations Over Internal Controls Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (‘‘GAAP’’). Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness for future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. 75 Management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that our internal controls will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of internal controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. Also, any evaluation of the effectiveness of controls in future periods are subject to the risk that those internal controls may become inadequate because of changes in business conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended October 1, 2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. 76 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Coherent, Inc. Santa Clara, CA We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Coherent, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the ‘‘Company’’) as of October 1, 2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of October 1, 2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control— Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended October 1, 2016, of the Company and our report dated November 29, 2016, expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP San Jose, California November 29, 2016 77 ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION Not applicable. 78 PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE Information regarding: (i) our directors will be set forth under the caption ‘‘Proposal One— Election of Directors—Nominees’’; (ii) compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 will be set forth under the caption ‘‘Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance’’; (iii) the process for stockholders to nominate directors will be set forth under the caption ‘‘Proposal One— Election of Directors—Process for Recommending Candidates for Election to the Board of Directors’’; (iv) our audit committee and audit committee financial expert will be set forth under the caption ‘‘Proposal One—Election of Directors—Board Meetings and Committees—Audit Committee’’; in our proxy statement for use in connection with an upcoming Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in 2017 (the ‘‘2017 Proxy Statement’’) and is incorporated herein by reference or included in a Form 10-K/A as an amendment to this Form 10-K. The 2017 Proxy Statement or Form 10-K/A will be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of our fiscal year. Business Conduct Policy We have adopted a worldwide Business Conduct Policy that applies to the members of our Board of Directors, executive officers and other employees. This policy is posted on our Website at www.coherent.com and may be found as follows: 1. From our main Web page, first click on ‘‘Company’’ and then on ‘‘corporate governance.’’ 2. Next, click on ‘‘Business Conduct Policy.’’ We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding an amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of this Business Conduct Policy by posting such information on our Website, at the address and location specified above. Stockholders may request free printed copies of our worldwide Business Conduct Policy from: Coherent, Inc. Attention: Investor Relations 5100 Patrick Henry Drive Santa Clara, California 95054 Executive Officers The name, age, position and a brief account of the business experience of our executive officers as of October 1, 2016 are set forth below: Name Age Office Held John R. Ambroseo . . . Kevin Palatnik . . . . . . Mark Sobey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Paul Sechrist Luis Spinelli . . . . . . . . Bret M. DiMarco . . . . President and Chief Executive Officer 55 58 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 56 Executive Vice President and General Manager, Specialty Laser Systems 57 Executive Vice President, Worldwide Sales and Service 68 Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer 48 Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary John R. Ambroseo. Mr. Ambroseo has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer as well as a member of the Board of Directors since October 2002. Mr. Ambroseo served as our Chief Operating Officer from June 2001 through September 2002. Mr. Ambroseo served as our Executive Vice President and as President and General Manager of the Coherent Photonics Group from September 2000 to June 2001. From September 1997 to September 2000, Mr. Ambroseo served as our Executive Vice President and as President and General Manager of the Coherent Laser Group. From 79 March 1997 to September 1997, Mr. Ambroseo served as our Scientific Business Unit Manager. From August 1988, when Mr. Ambroseo joined us, until March 1997, he served as a Sales Engineer, Product Marketing Manager, National Sales Manager and Director of European Operations. Mr. Ambroseo received a Bachelor degree from SUNY-College at Purchase and a PhD in Chemistry from the University of Pennsylvania. Kevin Palatnik. Mr. Palatnik has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since February 2016. Prior to his appointment, Mr. Palatnik was Chief Financial Officer at voice-technology provider, Audience, Inc. from August 2011 until it was acquired by the Knowles Corporation in July 2015. From April 2008 through September 2010, Mr. Palatnik served as the Chief Financial Officer at Cadence Design Systems, Inc., where he also led the investor relations, information technology and workplace resources groups. From April 2006 through March 2008, Mr. Palatnik served as the company’s Sr. Vice President and Corporate Controller. From July 2004 through March 2006, Mr. Palatnik served as the company’s Corporate Vice President of Technical Field Operations. From June 2001 through June 2004, Mr. Palatnik served as the company’s Corporate Vice President of Sales Finance & Operations. Prior to joining Cadence, Mr. Palatnik held a series of senior financial roles at IBM. Mr. Palatnik received a Bachelor of Science degree in industrial engineering and operations research, as well as a Master of Business Administration from Syracuse University. Mark Sobey. Mr. Sobey was appointed Executive Vice President of Coherent and General Manager of Specialty Laser Systems (SLS) in April 2010. He has served as Senior Vice President and General Manager for the SLS Business Group, which primarily serves the Microelectronics and Research markets, since joining Coherent in July 2007. Prior to Coherent, Mr. Sobey has spent over 20 years in the Laser and Fiber Optics Telecommunications industries, including roles as Senior Vice President Product Management at Cymer from January 2006 through June 2007 and previously as Senior Vice President Global Sales at JDS Uniphase through October 2005. He received his PhD in Engineering and BSc in Physics, both from the University of Strathclyde in Scotland. Paul Sechrist. Mr. Paul Sechrist was appointed Executive Vice President, Worldwide Sales and Service in March 2011. He has over 35 years of experience with Coherent, including roles as Senior Vice President and General Manager of Commercial Lasers and Components from October 2008 to March 2011, Vice President and General Manager of Specialty Laser Systems, Santa Clara from March 2008 to October 2008 and Vice President for Components from April 2005 to October 2008. Mr. Sechrist received an AA degree from San Jose City College, with Physics studies at California State University, Hayward. Luis Spinelli. Mr. Spinelli has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer since February 2004. Mr. Spinelli joined the Company in May 1985 and has since held various engineering and managerial positions, including Vice President, Advanced Research from April 2000 to September 2002 and Vice President, Corporate Research from September 2002 to February 2004. Mr. Spinelli has led the Advanced Research Unit from its inception in 1998, whose charter is to identify and evaluate new and emerging technologies of interest for us across a range of disciplines in the laser field. Mr. Spinelli holds a degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Buenos Aires, Argentina with post-graduate work at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Bret M. DiMarco. Mr. DiMarco has served as our Executive Vice President and General Counsel since June 2006 and our Corporate Secretary since February 2007. From February 2003 until May 2006, Mr. DiMarco was a member and from October 1995 until January 2003 was an associate at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., a law firm. Mr. DiMarco received a Bachelor’s degree from the University of California at Irvine and a Juris Doctorate degree from the Law Center at the University of Southern California. Mr. DiMarco also serves on the NASDAQ Listing and Hearing Review Council. 80 ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION Information regarding: (i) executive officer and director compensation will be set forth under the captions ‘‘Election of Directors—Director Compensation’’ and ‘‘Executive Officers and Executive Compensation’’ and (ii) compensation committee interlocks will be set forth under the caption ‘‘Executive Officers and Executive Compensation—Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation and Committee Independence’’ in the 2017 Proxy Statement or included in a Form 10-K/A as an amendment to our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 1, 2016. The 2017 Proxy Statement or Form 10-K/A will be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of our fiscal year. ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS Information regarding: (i) equity compensation plan information will be set forth under the caption ‘‘Equity Compensation Plan Information’’; and (ii) security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management will be set forth under the caption ‘‘Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management’’; in our 2017 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference or included in a Form 10-K/A as an amendment to our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 1, 2016. ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE The information required under this item will be set forth under the caption ‘‘Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions’’ in our 2017 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference or included in a Form 10-K/A as an amendment to our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 1, 2016. ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES Principal Accounting Fees and Services The following table sets forth fees for services provided by Deloitte & Touche LLP, the member firms of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, and their respective affiliates (collectively, ‘‘Deloitte’’) during fiscal years 2016 and 2015: Audit fees(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tax fees(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . All other fees(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,123,621 218,115 2,600 $2,030,577 176,323 2,600 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,344,336 $2,209,500 2016 2015 (1) Represents fees for professional services provided in connection with the integrated audit of our annual financial statements and internal control over financial reporting and review of our quarterly financial statements, advice on accounting matters that arose during the audit and audit services provided in connection with other statutory or regulatory filings. (2) Represents tax compliance and related services. (3) Represents the annual subscription for access to the Deloitte Accounting Research Tool, which is a searchable on-line accounting database. 81 Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services The Audit Committee has determined that the provision of non-audit services by Deloitte is compatible with maintaining Deloitte’s independence. In accordance with its charter, the Audit Committee approves in advance all audit and non-audit services to be provided by Deloitte. In other cases, the Chairman of the Audit Committee has the delegated authority from the Committee to pre-approve certain additional services, and such pre-approvals are communicated to the full Committee at its next meeting. During fiscal year 2016, all such services were pre-approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with this policy. 82 ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES (a) 1. Index to Consolidated Financial Statements PART IV The following Consolidated Financial Statements of Coherent, Inc. and its subsidiaries are filed as part of this annual report on Form 10-K: Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Balance Sheets—October 1, 2016 and October 3, 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Operations—Years ended October 1, 2016, October 3, 2015 and September 27, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income—Years ended October 1, 2016, October 3, 2015 and September 27, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity—Years ended October 1, 2016, October 3, 2015 and September 27, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—Years ended October 1, 2016, October 3, 2015 and September 27, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 135 2. Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules Financial statement schedules have been omitted because they are either not required, not applicable or the information required to be set forth therein is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements hereto. 3. Exhibits Exhibit Numbers 2.1* 3.1* 3.2* Merger Agreement, dated as of March 16, 2016, by and among the Company, Rembrandt Merger Sub Corp. and Rofin-Sinar Technologies Inc. (previously filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 16, 2016) Restated and Amended Certificate of Incorporation. (Previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 29, 1990) Certificate of Amendment of Restated and Amended Certificate of Incorporation of Coherent, Inc. (Previously filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 28, 2002) 3.3* Bylaws. (Previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K, filed on December 12, 2012) 10.1*‡ 10.2*‡ 10.3* 10.4*‡ Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan. (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form S-8 filed on June 12, 2012) Coherent Employee Retirement and Investment Plan. (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.23 to Form 8, Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 25, 1982) 1998 Director Option Plan. (Previously filed as Appendix B to Schedule 14A filed February 28, 2006) 2001 Stock Plan. (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 29, 2008) 83 Exhibit Numbers 10.5*‡ 10.6*‡ 10.7*‡ Change of Control Severance Plan, as amended and restated effective December 7, 2012. (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K, filed on December 17, 2014) Variable Compensation Plan, as amended. (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.7 to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 1, 2011) Fiscal 2015 Variable Compensation Plan Payout Scale (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q filed February 10, 2016) 10.8***‡ Fiscal 2016 Variable Compensation Plan Payout Scale (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q filed February 10, 2016) 10.9*‡ 10.10*‡ 10.11*‡ 10.12*‡ 10.13* 10.14* 10.15* 10.16* 10.17*‡ 10.18*‡ 10.19*‡ 10.20*‡ 10.21*‡ 10.22* Supplementary Retirement Plan. (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.5 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 1, 2006) 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan. (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2011) Form of 2001 Stock Plan Terms and Conditions of Restricted Stock Units. (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on November 27, 2009) Form of 2001 Stock Plan Amended Global Stock Option Agreement. (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed on November 27, 2009) Amended and Restated Loan Agreement by and between Coherent, Inc. and Union Bank of California, N.A. dated as of May 30, 2012. (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on June 5, 2012) Amended and Restated Promissory Note (Base Rate) (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed on June 5, 2012) Second Lease Amendment by and between Coherent, Inc. and 5200 Patrick Henry Associates LLC dated as of July 23, 2010. (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 3, 2010) Form of Indemnification Agreement (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.18 to Form 10-K for the year ended October 2, 2010) 2011 Equity Incentive Plan. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-174019) filed on May 6, 2011) Form of RSU Agreement for members of the Board of Directors under the Company’s 2011 Equity Incentive Plan. (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2011) Form of Option Agreement for members of the Board of Directors under the Company’s 2011 Equity Incentive Plan. (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2011) Form of Time-Based RSU Agreement under the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan. (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.23 to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 1, 2011) Form of Performance RSU Agreement under the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended November 8, 2013. (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed November 14, 2013) First Modification Agreement to Loan and Security Agreement with Union Bank, N.A., dated May 30, 2014 (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed June 3, 2014) 84 Exhibit Numbers 10.23‡ 10.24*‡ 10.25* 10.26* 10.27*‡ 21.1 23.1 24.1 31.1 31.2 32.1 32.2 Form of Performance RSU Agreement under the 2011 Equity Plan (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.25 to Form 10-K filed December 1, 2015) Offer letter with Kevin Palatnik (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q filed February 10, 2016) Credit Agreement, dated as of November 7, 2016, by and among Coherent, Inc., Coherent Holding GmbH, the guarantors from time to time party thereto, the lenders from time to time party thereto, Barclays Bank PLC, as Administrative Agent and L/C Issuer, Bank of America, N.A., as L/C Issuer, and The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UJF, Ltd., as L/C Issuer (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed November 8, 2016) Form of Performance RSU Award Terms (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.23 to Form 10-K filed December 1, 2015) Transition Service Agreement, dated February 22, 2016, between the Company and Helene Simonet (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q filed May 11, 2016) Subsidiaries Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Power of Attorney (see signature page) Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. * These exhibits were previously filed with the Commission as indicated and are incorporated herein by reference. ** Portions of this exhibit are redacted and confidential treatment has been requested. ‡ Identifies management contract or compensatory plans or arrangements required to be filed as an exhibit. 85 Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. SIGNATURES COHERENT, INC. Date: November 29, 2016 By: /s/ JOHN R. AMBROSEO John R. Ambroseo President and Chief Executive Officer POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints John R. Ambroseo and Kevin Palatnik, and each of them individually, as his attorney-in-fact, each with full power of substitution, for him in any and all capacities to sign any and all amendments to this Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same with, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact, or his or her substitute, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated: /s/ JOHN R. AMBROSEO John R. Ambroseo (Director and Principal Executive Officer) /s/ KEVIN PALATNIK Kevin Palatnik (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) /s/ JAY T. FLATLEY Jay T. Flatley (Director) /s/ SUSAN M. JAMES Susan M. James (Director) November 29, 2016 Date November 29, 2016 Date November 29, 2016 Date November 29, 2016 Date 86 /s/ L. WILLIAM KRAUSE L. William Krause (Director) /s/ GARRY W. ROGERSON Garry W. Rogerson (Director) /s/ STEVE SKAGGS Steve Skaggs (Director) /s/ SANDEEP VIJ Sandeep Vij (Director) November 29, 2016 Date November 29, 2016 Date November 29, 2016 Date November 29, 2016 Date 87 STATEMENT OF MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY Management is responsible for the preparation, integrity, and objectivity of the Consolidated Financial Statements and other financial information included in the Company’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and reflect the effects of certain estimates and judgments made by management. It is critical for investors and other readers of the Consolidated Financial Statements to have confidence that the financial information that we provide is timely, complete, relevant and accurate. Management, with oversight by the Company’s Board of Directors, has established and maintains a corporate culture that requires that the Company’s affairs be conducted to the highest standards of business ethics and conduct. Management also maintains a system of internal controls that is designed to provide reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded and that transactions are properly recorded and executed in accordance with management’s authorization. This system is regularly monitored through direct management review, as well as extensive audits conducted by internal auditors throughout the organization. Our Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the year ended October 1, 2016 have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm. Their audit was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and included an integrated audit under such standards. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors meets regularly with management, the internal auditors and the independent registered public accounting firm to review accounting, reporting, auditing and internal control matters. The Audit Committee has direct and private access to both internal and external auditors. See Item 9A for Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. We are committed to enhancing shareholder value and fully understand and embrace our fiduciary oversight responsibilities. We are dedicated to ensuring that our high standards of financial accounting and reporting as well as our underlying system of internal controls are maintained. Our culture demands integrity and we have the highest confidence in our processes, internal controls, and people, who are objective in their responsibilities and operate under the highest level of ethical standards. /s/ JOHN R. AMBROSEO /s/ KEVIN PALATNIK John R. Ambroseo President and Chief Executive Officer Kevin Palatnik Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 88 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Coherent, Inc. Santa Clara, CA We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Coherent, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the ‘‘Company’’) as of October 1, 2016 and October 3, 2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 1, 2016. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of October 1, 2016 and October 3, 2015, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 1, 2016, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of October 1, 2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated November 29, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP San Jose, California November 29, 2016 89 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (In thousands, except par value) October 1, 2016 October 3, 2015 Current assets: ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Short-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts receivable—net of allowances of $2,420 in 2016 and $3,015 in 2015 Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaid expenses and other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 354,347 45,606 165,715 212,898 37,073 Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill Intangible assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 815,639 127,443 101,458 13,874 102,734 $130,607 194,908 142,260 156,614 28,294 652,683 102,445 101,817 22,776 89,226 Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,161,148 $968,947 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY Current liabilities: Short term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income taxes payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Commitments and contingencies (Note 10) Stockholders’ equity: Common stock, par value $.01: Authorized—500,000 shares; Outstanding—24,324 shares in 2016 and 23,970 shares in 2015 . . . . . . . . . Additional paid-in capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accumulated other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,000 45,182 19,870 116,442 201,494 48,826 $ — 33,379 4,279 84,932 122,590 49,939 242 151,298 (5,300) 764,588 238 128,607 (9,513) 677,086 Total stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 910,828 796,418 Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,161,148 $968,947 See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 90 79,070 154,030 — — 3,424 236,524 76,866 397 (72) 2,028 2,353 79,219 20,113 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (In thousands, except per share data) Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $857,385 475,993 $802,460 467,061 $794,639 481,249 Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 381,392 335,399 313,390 Year Ended October 1, 2016 October 3, 2015 September 27, 2014 Operating expenses: Research and development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selling, general and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gain on business combination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Impairment of investment Amortization of intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81,801 169,138 — — 2,839 81,455 149,829 (1,316) 2,017 2,667 Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253,778 234,652 Income from operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other income (expense): Interest and dividend income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other—net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total other income (expense), net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127,614 100,747 1,143 (1,346) (4,515) (4,718) 595 (48) (1,726) (1,179) 99,568 23,159 Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122,896 35,394 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 87,502 $ 76,409 $ 59,106 Net income per share: Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 3.62 3.58 $ $ 3.09 3.06 $ $ 2.39 2.36 Shares used in computation: Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,142 24,415 24,754 24,992 24,760 25,076 See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 91 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (In thousands) Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive income (loss):(1) Translation adjustment, net of taxes(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net of taxes(3) . . . . . . Changes in unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Year Ended October 1, October 3, 2016 2015 September 27, 2014 $87,502 $ 76,409 $ 59,106 1,731 (28) (45,624) 601 (19,185) (573) 2,510 4,213 828 (10) (44,195) (19,768) Comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $91,715 $ 32,214 $ 39,338 (1) Reclassification adjustments were not significant during fiscal years 2016, 2015 and 2014. (2) Tax expenses (benefits) of $279, $(1,768) and $250 were provided on translation adjustments during fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. (3) Tax expenses (benefits) of $(17), $349 and $(332) were provided on net gain (loss) on derivative instruments during fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. (4) Tax expenses (benefits) of $1,399, $486 and $(7) were provided on changes in unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities during fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. 92 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY Three Years in the Period Ended October 1, 2016 (In thousands) Common Stock Shares Common Stock Par Value Add. Paid-in Capital Accum. Other Comp. Retained Income(Loss) Earnings Total Balances, September 28, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . 24,464 Common stock issued under stock plans, net of shares withheld for employee taxes . . . . Tax impact from employee stock options . . . Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive income, net of tax . . . 486 — — — — Balances, September 27, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . 24,950 Common stock issued under stock plans, net of shares withheld for employee taxes . . . . Tax impact from employee stock options . . . Repurchases of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive loss, net of tax . . . . . . 322 — (1,302) — — — Balances, October 3, 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,970 Common stock issued under stock plans, net of shares withheld for employee taxes . . . . Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive loss, net of tax . . . . . . 354 — — — $244 $162,253 $ 54,450 $541,571 $758,518 4 — — — — — 2,870 — (52) — 18,971 — — — (19,768) 2,874 — — (52) — 18,971 59,106 — (19,768) 59,106 $248 $184,042 $ 34,682 $600,677 $819,649 4 — (14) — — — — 2,002 — (667) — (75,013) — 18,243 — — — (44,195) 2,006 — (667) — — (75,027) — 18,243 76,409 — (44,195) 76,409 $238 $128,607 $ (9,513) $677,086 $796,418 4 — — — 2,402 20,289 — — — — — 4,213 — 2,406 — 20,289 87,502 4,213 87,502 — Balances, October 1, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,324 $242 $151,298 $ (5,300) $764,588 $910,828 See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 93 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (In thousands) Year Ended October 1, October 3, 2016 2015 September 27, 2014 $ 87,502 $ 76,409 $ 59,106 Cash flows from operating activities: Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gain on business combination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Impairment of investment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other non-cash expense (income) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions: Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaid expenses and other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income taxes payable/receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other long-term liabilities 25,905 8,450 — — 20,157 (9,770) 963 (17,525) (55,708) (4,855) (1,552) 9,735 7,384 30,661 3,952 24,815 8,244 (1,316) 2,017 18,232 838 526 (10,099) 6,054 (2,048) 802 1,000 (6,759) 5,623 120 Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105,299 124,458 Cash flows from investing activities: Purchases of property and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from dispositions of property and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Purchases of available-for-sale securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from sales and maturities of available-for-sale securities . . . . . . . . . . . Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (49,327) 555 (180,842) 333,058 — (22,163) 1,163 (312,592) 346,059 (9,300) Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103,444 3,167 Cash flows from financing activities: Short-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Repayments of short-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net change in capital lease obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Issuance of common stock under employee stock option and purchase plans . . . . Repurchase of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Debt issuance costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net settlement of restricted common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 54,792 (34,792) — 7,849 — (5,202) (5,443) 17,204 (2,207) 223,740 130,607 $ 38,729 (38,729) — 7,308 (75,027) — (5,302) (73,021) (15,214) 39,390 91,217 26,608 9,593 — — 18,897 (8,185) (1,364) (5,191) (6,890) 11,635 (3,489) (2,295) (11,373) (580) 4,907 91,379 (23,390) 585 (280,408) 193,430 — (109,783) $ 61,523 (61,499) (2) 10,685 — — (7,811) 2,896 (3,719) (19,227) 110,444 Cash and cash equivalents, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 354,347 $ 130,607 $ 91,217 Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: Cash paid during the year for: Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 149 $ 43,884 $ 48 $ 29,816 Cash received during the year for: Income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Noncash investing and financing activities: Unpaid property and equipment purchases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 6,126 3,492 $ $ 3,297 1,425 $ 32 $ 44,055 $ $ 7,022 721 See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 94 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS Founded in 1966, Coherent, Inc. provides lasers and laser-based technology in a broad range of commercial and scientific research applications. Coherent designs, manufactures, services and markets lasers and related accessories for a diverse group of customers. Headquartered in Santa Clara, California, the Company has worldwide operations including research and development, manufacturing, sales, service and support capabilities. 2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Fiscal Year Our fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to September 30. Fiscal years 2016, 2015 and 2014 ended on October 1, 2016, October 3, 2015 and September 27, 2014, respectively, and are referred to in these financial statements as fiscal 2016, fiscal 2015, and fiscal 2014 for convenience. Fiscal years 2016 and 2014 include 52 weeks and fiscal year 2015 includes 53 weeks. The fiscal years of the majority of our international subsidiaries end on September 30. Accordingly, the financial statements of these subsidiaries as of that date and for the years then ended have been used for our consolidated financial statements. Management believes that the impact of the use of different year-ends is immaterial to our consolidated financial statements taken as a whole. Use of Estimates The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (‘‘GAAP’’) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Basis of Presentation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Coherent, Inc. and its majority- owned subsidiaries (collectively, the ‘‘Company’’, ‘‘we’’, ‘‘our’’, or ‘‘Coherent’’). Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. Fair Value of Financial Instruments The carrying amounts of certain of our financial instruments including accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value due to their short maturities. Short-term investments are comprised of available-for-sale securities, which are carried at fair value. Other non-current assets include trading securities and life insurance contracts related to our deferred compensation plans; trading securities are carried at fair value and life insurance contracts are carried at cash surrender values, which due to their ability to be converted to cash at that amount, approximate their fair values. Foreign exchange contracts are stated at fair value based on prevailing financial market information. 95 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) Cash Equivalents All highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase are classified as cash equivalents. At fiscal 2016 year-end, cash and cash equivalents included cash and money market funds. Concentration of Credit Risk Financial instruments that may potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash equivalents, short-term investments and accounts receivable. At fiscal 2016 year-end, the majority of our short-term investments were in commercial paper and equity securities. Cash equivalents and short-term investments are maintained with several financial institutions and may exceed the amount of insurance provided on such balances. At October 1, 2016, we held cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments outside the U.S. in certain of our foreign operations totaling approximately $331.0 million, $93.1 million of which was denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. The majority of our accounts receivable are derived from sales to customers for commercial applications. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers’ financial condition and limit the amount of credit extended when deemed necessary but generally require no collateral. In certain instances, we may require customers to issue a letter of credit. We maintain reserves for potential credit losses. Our products are broadly distributed and there was one customer who accounted for 18.0% and 21.4% of accounts receivable at fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015 year-end. We had another customer who accounted for 18.7% of accounts receivable at fiscal 2016 year-end. Derivative Financial Instruments Our primary objective for holding derivative financial instruments is to manage currency exchange rate risk. Principal currencies hedged include the Euro, South Korean Won, Japanese Yen, British Pound, Chinese Renminbi, Malaysian Ringgit and Singapore dollar. Our derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value, on a gross basis, and are included in other current assets and other current liabilities. Our accounting policies for derivative financial instruments are based on whether they meet the criteria for designation as a cash flow hedge. Changes in the fair value of these cash flow hedges that are highly effective are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same line item on the consolidated statements of operations as the impact of the hedged transaction during the period in which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portion of cash flow hedges are recognized immediately in other income and expenses. Derivatives that we designate as cash flow hedges are classified in the consolidated statements of cash flows in the same section as the underlying item, primarily within cash flows from operating activities. The changes in fair value of derivative instruments that are not designated as hedges are recognized immediately in other income (expense). We formally document all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as the risk management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. This process includes linking all derivatives that are designated as cash-flow hedges to specific forecasted transactions. We also assess, both at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of the hedged items. 96 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) Accounts Receivable Allowances Accounts receivable allowances reflect our best estimate of probable losses inherent in our accounts receivable balances. We regularly review allowances by considering factors such as historical experience, credit quality, the age of the accounts receivable balances and current economic conditions that may affect a customer’s ability to pay. Activity in accounts receivable allowance is as follows (in thousands): Beginning balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Additions charged to expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deductions from reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2016 $ 3,015 2,084 (2,679) Fiscal 2015 $1,155 2,716 (856) 2014 $ 1,386 1,194 (1,425) Ending balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,420 $3,015 $ 1,155 Inventories Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. Inventories are as follows (in thousands): Purchased parts and assemblies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Work-in-process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Finished goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 56,824 88,391 67,683 $ 50,182 56,225 50,207 Total inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $212,898 $156,614 Fiscal year-end 2016 2015 Property and Equipment Property and equipment are stated at cost and are depreciated or amortized using the straight-line method. Cost, accumulated depreciation and amortization, and estimated useful lives are as follows (dollars in thousands): Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Buildings and improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . Equipment, furniture and fixtures . . . . . . . . Leasehold improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accumulated depreciation and amortization Fiscal year-end $ 2016 7,523 85,908 248,741 38,979 2015 Useful Life $ 6,132 69,970 230,208 31,290 5 - 40 years 3 - 10 years 1 - 15 years 381,151 (253,708) 337,600 (235,155) Property and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . $ 127,443 $ 102,445 97 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) Asset Retirement Obligations The fair value (the present value of estimated cash flows) of a liability for an asset retirement obligation is recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The fair value of the liability is added to the carrying amount of the associated asset and this additional carrying amount is depreciated over the life of the asset. All of our existing asset retirement obligations are associated with commitments to return the property to its original condition upon lease termination at various sites and costs to clean up and dispose of certain fixed assets at our Sunnyvale, California site. We estimated that as of fiscal 2016 year-end, gross expected future cash flows of $3.1 million would be required to fulfill these obligations. The following table reconciles changes in our asset retirement liability for fiscal 2016 and 2015 (in thousands): Asset retirement liability as of September 27, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjustment to asset retirement obligations recognized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accretion recognized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Changes due to foreign currency exchange . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Asset retirement liability as of October 3, 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjustment to asset retirement obligations recognized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accretion recognized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Changes due to foreign currency exchange . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,222 542 55 (165) 2,654 (14) 71 85 Asset retirement liability as of October 1, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,796 At October 1, 2016 and October 3, 2015, the asset retirement liability is included in Other long-term liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. Long-lived Assets We evaluate the carrying value of long-lived assets, including intangible assets, whenever events or changes in business circumstances or our planned use of long-lived assets indicate that their carrying amounts may not be fully recoverable or that their useful lives are no longer appropriate. Reviews are performed to determine whether the carrying values of long-lived assets are impaired based on a comparison to the undiscounted expected future net cash flows. If the comparison indicates that impairment exists, long-lived assets that are classified as held and used are written down to their respective fair values. When long-lived assets are classified as held for sale, they are written down to their respective fair values less costs to sell. Significant management judgment is required in the forecast of future operating results that is used in the preparation of expected undiscounted cash flows. For fiscal years 2016, 2015 and 2014, there were no significant asset impairments recorded other than the $2 million impairment of our investment in SiOnyx in fiscal 2015 (See Note 8. ‘‘Balance Sheet Details’’). Goodwill Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis and between annual tests in certain circumstances, and written down when impaired (see Note 7. ‘‘Goodwill and Intangible Assets’’). In 98 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) testing for impairment, we have the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not (that is, a likelihood of more than 50%) that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. Moreover, an entity can bypass the qualitative assessment for any reporting unit in any period and proceed directly to step one of the impairment test, and then resume performing the qualitative assessment in any subsequent period. In both our fiscal 2016 and 2015 annual testing, we performed a qualitative assessment of the goodwill for our SLS reporting unit using the opening balance sheet as of the first day of the fourth quarter and noted no impairment. For the CLC reporting unit, we elected to bypass the qualitative assessment and proceed directly to performing the first step of the goodwill impairment test. Accordingly, we performed our Step 1 test using the opening balance sheet as of the first day of the fourth quarter and noted no impairment in both fiscal 2016 and 2015. (See Note 7 for additional discussion of the fiscal 2016 analysis.) Intangible Assets Intangible assets, including acquired existing technology, customer lists and trade name are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, currently 3 year to 15 years (See Note 7. ‘‘Goodwill and Intangible Assets’’). Warranty Reserves We provide warranties on the majority of our product sales and reserves for estimated warranty costs are recorded during the period of sale. The determination of such reserves requires us to make estimates of product return rates and expected costs to repair or replace the products under warranty. We currently establish warranty reserves based on historical warranty costs for each product line. The weighted average warranty period covered is approximately 15 months. If actual return rates and/or repair and replacement costs differ significantly from our estimates, adjustments to cost of sales may be required in future periods. Components of the reserve for warranty costs during fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014 were as follows (in thousands): Beginning balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Additions related to current period sales . . . . . . . Warranty costs incurred in the current period . . . Accruals resulting from acquisitions . . . . . . . . . . Adjustments to accruals related to foreign 2016 $ 15,308 21,859 (21,393) — Fiscal 2015 $ 16,961 20,959 (21,922) 215 2014 $ 18,508 24,149 (25,144) — exchange and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175 (905) (552) Ending balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 15,949 $ 15,308 $ 16,961 Loss contingencies We are subject to the possibility of various loss contingencies arising in the ordinary course of business. We consider the likelihood of loss or impairment of an asset, or the incurrence of a liability, as well as our ability to reasonably estimate the amount of loss, in determining loss contingencies. An 99 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) estimated loss contingency is accrued when it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. If we determine that a loss is possible and the range of the loss can be reasonably determined, then we disclose the range of the possible loss. We regularly evaluate current information available to us to determine whether an accrual is required, an accrual should be adjusted or a range of possible loss should be disclosed. Revenue Recognition When a sales arrangement contains multiple elements, such as products and/or services, we allocate revenue to each element based on a selling price hierarchy. Using the selling price hierarchy, we determine the selling price of each deliverable using vendor specific objective evidence (‘‘VSOE’’), if it exists, and otherwise third-party evidence (‘‘TPE’’). If neither VSOE nor TPE of selling price exists, we use estimated selling price (‘‘ESP’’). We generally expect that we will not be able to establish TPE due to the nature of the markets in which we compete, and, as such, we typically will determine selling price using VSOE or if not available, ESP. Our basis for establishing VSOE of a deliverable’s selling price consists of standalone sales transactions when the same or similar product or service is sold separately. However, when services are never sold separately, such as product installation services, VSOE is based on the product’s estimated installation hours based on historical experience multiplied by the standard service billing rate. In determining VSOE, we require that a substantial majority of the selling price for a product or service fall within a reasonably narrow price range, as defined by us. We also consider the geographies in which the products or services are sold, major product and service groups, and other environmental variables in determining VSOE. Absent the existence of VSOE and TPE, our determination of a deliverable’s ESP involves evaluating several factors based on the specific facts and circumstances of these arrangements, which include pricing strategy and policies driven by geographies, market conditions, competitive landscape, correlation between proportionate selling price and list price established by management having the relevant authority, and other environmental variables in which the deliverable is sold. For multiple element arrangements which include extended maintenance contracts, we allocate and defer the amount of consideration equal to the separately stated price and recognize revenue on a straight-line basis over the contract period. We recognize revenue when all four revenue recognition criteria have been met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the product has been delivered or the service has been rendered, the price is fixed or determinable and collection is reasonably assured. Revenue from product sales is recorded when all of the foregoing conditions are met and risk of loss and title passes to the customer. Sales to customers are generally not subject to any price protection or return rights. The majority of our sales are made to original equipment manufacturers (‘‘OEMs’’), distributors, representatives and end-users in the non-scientific market. Sales made to these customers do not require installation of the products by us and are not subject to other post-delivery obligations, except in occasional instances where we have agreed to perform installation or provide training. In those instances, we defer revenue related to installation services or training until these services have been rendered. We allocate revenue from multiple element arrangements to the various elements based upon relative fair values. 100 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) Our sales to distributors, representatives and end-user customers typically do not have customer acceptance provisions and only certain of our sales to OEM customers and integrators have customer acceptance provisions. Customer acceptance is generally limited to performance under our published product specifications. For the few product sales that have customer acceptance provisions because of higher than published specifications, (1) the products are tested and accepted by the customer at our site or the customer accepts the results of our testing program prior to shipment to the customer, or (2) the revenue is deferred until customer acceptance occurs. Sales to end-users in the scientific market typically require installation and, thus, involve post-delivery obligations; however, our post-delivery installation obligations are not essential to the functionality of our products. We defer revenue related to installation services until completion of these services. For most products, training is not provided; therefore, no post-delivery training obligation exists. However, when training is provided to our customers, it is typically priced separately and is recognized as revenue as these services are provided. We record taxes collected on revenue-producing activities on a net basis. Research and Development Research and development expenses include salaries, contractor and consultant fees, supplies and materials, as well as costs related to other overhead such as depreciation, facilities, utilities and other departmental expenses. The costs we incur with respect to internally developed technology and engineering services are included in research and development expenses as incurred as they do not directly relate to any particular licensee, license agreement or license fee. We treat third party and government funding of our research and development activity, where we are the primary beneficiary of such work conducted, as a reduction of research and development cost. Research and development reimbursements of $2.7 million, $2.5 million and $7.2 million were offset against research and development costs in fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Foreign Currency Translation The functional currencies of our foreign subsidiaries are generally their respective local currencies. Accordingly, gains and losses from the translation of the financial statements of the foreign subsidiaries are reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income (‘‘OCI’’). Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included in earnings. Comprehensive Income (Loss) Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as the change in equity of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (net of tax) at fiscal 2016 year-end is substantially comprised of accumulated translation adjustments of $(8.6) million and unrealized gain on marketable equity securities of $3.3 million. Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (net of tax) at fiscal 2015 year-end is substantially comprised of accumulated translation adjustments of $(10.4) million. 101 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) Earnings Per Share Basic earnings per share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period, excluding unvested restricted stock. Diluted earnings per share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period increased by the effect of dilutive employee stock awards, including stock options, restricted stock awards and stock purchase contracts, using the treasury stock method. The following table presents information necessary to calculate basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except per share data): Weighted average shares outstanding—basic . . . . . . . . Dilutive effect of employee stock awards . . . . . . . . . . . Weighted average shares outstanding—diluted . . . . . . . 2016 24,142 273 24,415 Fiscal 2015 24,754 238 24,992 2014 24,760 316 25,076 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $87,502 $76,409 $59,106 Net income—basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income—diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 3.62 3.58 $ $ 3.09 3.06 $ $ 2.39 2.36 There were 323, 0 and 47,242 potentially dilutive securities excluded from the dilutive share calculation for fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, as its effect was anti-dilutive. Stock-Based Compensation We account for stock-based compensation using the fair value of the awards granted. We value restricted stock units using the intrinsic value method, which is based on the fair market value price on the grant date. We use a Monte Carlo simulation model to estimate the fair value of performance restricted stock units. We use historical data to estimate pre-vesting option and restricted stock unit forfeitures and record stock-based compensation expense only for those awards that are expected to vest. We amortize the fair value of stock awards on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the awards, which are generally the vesting periods. See Note 12 ‘‘Employee Stock Award, Option and Benefit Plans’’ for a description of our stock-based employee compensation plans and the assumptions we use to calculate the fair value of stock-based employee compensation. Shipping and Handling Costs We record costs related to shipping and handling of net sales in cost of sales for all periods presented. Shipping and handling fees billed to customers are included in net sales. Custom duties billed to customers are recorded in cost of sales. Income Taxes As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our income tax provision (benefit) in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves us estimating our current income tax provision (benefit) together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. 102 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our consolidated balance sheets. We account for uncertain tax issues pursuant to ASC 740-10 Income Taxes, which creates a single model to address accounting for uncertainty in tax positions by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold that a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. This standard provides a two-step approach for evaluating tax positions. The first step, recognition, occurs when a company concludes (based solely on the technical aspects of the matter) that a tax position is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by a taxing authority. The second step, measurement, is only considered after step one has been satisfied and measures any tax benefit at the largest amount that is deemed more likely than not to be realized upon ultimate settlement of the uncertainty. These determinations involve significant judgment by management. Tax positions that fail to qualify for initial recognition are recognized in the first subsequent interim period that they meet the more likely than not standard or when they are resolved through negotiation or litigation with factual interpretation, judgment and certainty. Tax laws and regulations themselves are complex and are subject to change as a result of changes in fiscal policy, changes in legislation, evolution of regulations and court filings. Therefore, the actual liability for U.S. or foreign taxes may be materially different from our estimates, which could result in the need to record additional tax liabilities or potentially to reverse previously recorded tax liabilities. We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to an amount that more likely than not will be realized. While we have considered future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance, in the event we were to determine that we would be able to realize our deferred tax assets in the future in excess of our net recorded amount, an adjustment to the allowance for the deferred tax asset would increase income in the period such determination was made. Likewise, should we determine that we would not be able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax asset in the future, an adjustment to the allowance for the deferred tax asset would be charged to income in the period such determination was made. Federal and state income taxes have not been provided on a portion of the unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries because such earnings are intended to be permanently reinvested. The total amount of unremitted earnings (including accumulated translation adjustments) of foreign subsidiaries for which we have not yet recorded federal and state income taxes was approximately $574.0 million and $471.9 million at fiscal 2016 and 2015 year-end, respectively. The amount of federal and state income taxes that would be payable upon repatriation of such earnings is not practicably determinable. We have not, nor do we anticipate the need to, repatriate funds to the United States to satisfy domestic liquidity needs arising in the ordinary course of business. Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements In November 2015, the FASB issued amended guidance that clarifies that in a classified statement of financial position, an entity shall classify deferred tax liabilities and assets as noncurrent amounts. The new guidance supersedes ASC 740-10-45-5 which required the valuation allowance for a particular tax jurisdiction be allocated between current and noncurrent deferred tax assets for that tax jurisdiction on a pro rata basis. We elected to early adopt the standard retrospectively in the first quarter of fiscal 2016, which resulted in the reclassification of $28.1 million from current deferred income tax assets to 103 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) non-current deferred income tax assets and non-current deferred income tax liabilities as of October 3, 2015. In April 2015, the FASB issued amended guidance that simplifies the presentation of debt issuance costs by requiring that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amended guidance. The new standard will become effective for our fiscal year beginning October 2, 2016. We elected to early adopt the standard in the second quarter of fiscal 2016 and have recorded the debt issuance costs of $5.2 million as of October 1, 2016 in other assets for the debt commitment we entered into in the second quarter of fiscal 2016. The debt issuance cost related to the term loan facility will be reclassified to debt in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements In October 2016, the FASB issued amended guidance that improves the accounting for the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory. Under the new guidance, an entity should recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. The new standard will become effective for our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2018. We are currently assessing the impact of this amended guidance and the timing of adoption. In May 2016, accounting guidance was issued to clarify the not yet effective revenue recognition guidance issued in May 2014. This additional guidance does not change the core principle of the revenue recognition guidance issued in May 2014, rather, it provides clarification of accounting for collections of sales taxes as well as recognition of revenue (i) associated with contract modifications, (ii) for noncash consideration, and (iii) based on the collectability of the consideration from the customer. The guidance also specifies when a contract should be considered ‘‘completed’’ for purposes of applying the transition guidance. The effective date and transition requirements for this guidance are the same as the effective date and transition requirements for the guidance previously issued in 2014, which is effective for our fiscal year beginning September 30, 2018. We are currently evaluating the new guidance and have not determined the impact this standard may have on our financial statements nor have we decided upon the method of adoption. In March 2016, the FASB issued amended guidance that simplifies several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. Under the new guidance, an entity recognizes all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement. This change eliminates the notion of the APIC pool and significantly reduces the complexity and cost of accounting for excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies. The new standard will become effective for our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2017. We are currently assessing the impact of this amended guidance and the timing of adoption. In February 2016, the FASB issued amended guidance to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. The new guidance clarifies the criteria for distinguishing between a finance lease and operating lease, as well as classification between the two types of leases, which is substantially unchanged from the previous lease guidance. Further, the new guidance requires 104 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) a lessee to recognize in the statement of financial position a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a right-of-use asset, initially measured at the present value of the lease payments. For finance leases, a lessee should recognize interest on the lease liability separately from amortization of the right-of-use asset. For operating leases, a lessee should recognize a single lease cost, calculated so that the cost of the lease is allocated over the lease term on a generally straight-line basis. For leases with a term of 12 months or less, a lessee is permitted to make an accounting policy election not to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. The new standard will become effective for our fiscal year beginning September 29, 2019. We are currently assessing the impact of this amended guidance and the timing of adoption. In January 2016, the FASB issued amended guidance that revises the recognition and measurement of financial instruments. The new guidance requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting, or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income, requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes, requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset, and eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost. The new standard will become effective for our fiscal year beginning September 30, 2018. We are currently assessing the impact of this amended guidance and the timing of adoption. 3. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS Rofin-Sinar Technologies, Inc. On November 7, 2016, we acquired Rofin-Sinar Technologies, Inc. (‘‘Rofin’’), one of the world’s leading developers and manufacturers of high-performance industrial laser sources and laser-based solutions and components. See Note 16, ‘‘Subsequent Events’’ for further discussion of the acquisition. Fiscal 2015 Acquisitions Raydiance, Inc. On July 24, 2015, we acquired certain assets of Raydiance, Inc. (‘‘Raydiance’’) for approximately $5.0 million, excluding transaction costs. Raydiance manufactured complete tools and lasers for ultrafast processing systems and subsystems in the precision micromachining processing market. The Raydiance assets have been included in our Specialty Lasers and Systems segment. Our allocation of the purchase price is as follows (in thousands): Tangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intangible assets: $1,048 1,552 Existing technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Customer lists . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 800 1,600 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $5,000 105 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 3. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS (Continued) The purchase price allocated to goodwill was finalized in the first quarter of fiscal 2016, with an increase of $0.4 million and a corresponding decrease of $0.4 million to tangible assets, and has been updated from the preliminary allocation in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015. Results of operations for the business have been included in our consolidated financial statements subsequent to the date of acquisition and pro forma results of operations in accordance with authoritative guidance for prior periods have not been presented because the effect of the acquisition was not material to our prior period consolidated financial results. The identifiable intangible assets are being amortized over their respective useful lives of three to five years. None of the goodwill from this purchase is deductible for tax purposes. We expensed $0.1 million of acquisition-related costs as selling, general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of operations for our fiscal year 2015. Tinsley Optics On July 27, 2015, we acquired the assets and certain liabilities of the Tinsley Optics (‘‘Tinsley’’) business from L-3 Communications Corporation for approximately $4.3 million, excluding transaction costs. Tinsley is a specialized manufacturer of high precision optical components and subsystems sold primarily in the aerospace and defense industry. Tinsley manufactures the large form factor optics for our excimer laser annealing systems. Tinsley has been included in our Specialty Lasers and Systems segment. Our allocation of the purchase price is as follows (in thousands): Tangible assets: Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaid expenses and other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Liabilities assumed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gain on business combination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,263 2,240 1,132 2,451 (1,702) (768) (1,316) Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4,300 The purchase price was lower than the fair value of net assets purchased, resulting in a gain of $1.3 million recorded as a separate line item in our consolidated statements of operations for our fiscal year 2015. The Company reassessed the recognition and measurement of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed and concluded that all acquired assets and assumed liabilities were recognized and that the valuation procedures and resulting measures were appropriate. Results of operations for the business have been included in our consolidated financial statements subsequent to the date of acquisition and pro forma results of operations in accordance with authoritative guidance for prior periods have not been presented because the effect of the acquisition was not material to our prior period consolidated financial results. 106 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 3. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS (Continued) The gain from the bargain purchase is not subject to income taxation. We expensed $0.4 million of acquisition-related costs as selling, general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of operations for our fiscal year 2015. 4. FAIR VALUES We measure our cash equivalents and marketable securities at fair value. The fair values of our financial assets and liabilities are determined using quoted market prices of identical assets or quoted market prices of similar assets from active markets. We recognize transfers between levels within the fair value hierarchy, if any, at the end of each quarter. There were no transfers between levels during the periods presented. As of October 1, 2016 and October 3, 2015, we did not have any assets or liabilities valued based on Level 3 valuations. Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value as of October 1, 2016 and October 3, 2015 are summarized below (in thousands): Quoted Prices in Active Significant Other Quoted Prices in Active Aggregate Markets for Fair Value Identical Assets Observable Aggregate Markets for Inputs Fair Value Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Fiscal year-end 2016 Fiscal year-end 2015 (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 1) (Level 2) Assets: Cash equivalents: Money market fund deposits . . . . . $237,142 $237,142 $ — $ 8,297 $ 8,297 $ — Short-term investments: U.S. Treasury and agency obligations(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Corporate notes and obligations(2) Commercial paper(2) . . . . . . . . . . Equity securities(1) . . . . . . . . . . . 125 — 24,999 20,482 — — — 20,482 125 — 24,999 — 150,748 17,942 9,740 16,478 — — — 16,478 Prepaid and other assets: Foreign currency contracts(3) . . . . Mutual funds—Deferred comp and . . . . . . . . supplemental plan(4) 889 — 889 258 — 14,399 14,399 — 13,891 13,891 150,748 17,942 9,740 — 258 — Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $298,036 $272,023 $26,013 $217,354 $38,666 $178,688 Liabilities: Other current liabilities: Foreign currency contracts(3) . . . . (3,100) — (3,100) (239) — (239) Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $294,936 $272,023 $22,913 $217,115 $38,666 $178,449 (1) Valuations are based upon quoted market prices. (2) Valuations are based upon quoted market prices in active markets involving similar assets. The market inputs used to value these instruments generally consist of market yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. Pricing sources include industry standard data providers, security master files from large financial institutions, and other third party sources 107 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 4. FAIR VALUES (Continued) which are input into a distribution-curve-based algorithm to determine a daily market value. This creates a ‘‘consensus price’’ or a weighted average price for each security. (3) The principal market in which we execute our foreign currency contracts is the institutional market in an over-the-counter environment with a relatively high level of price transparency. The market participants usually are large commercial banks. Our foreign currency contracts’ valuation inputs are based on quoted prices and quoted pricing intervals from public data sources and do not involve management judgment. At October 1, 2016, prepaid expenses and other assets include $889 non-designated forward contracts; other current liabilities include $3,100 non-designated forward contracts. At October 3, 2015, prepaid expenses and other assets include $217 non-designated forward contracts and $41 foreign currency contracts designated for cash flow hedges, respectively; other current liabilities include $239 non-designated forward contracts and $0 foreign currency contracts designated for cash flow hedges, respectively. See Note 6, ‘‘Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities’’. (4) The fair value of mutual funds is determined based on quoted market prices. Securities traded on a national exchange are stated at the last reported sales price on the day of valuation; other securities traded in over-the-counter markets and listed securities for which no sale was reported on that date are stated as the last quoted bid price. 5. SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS We consider all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. Investments classified as available-for-sale are reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses, net of related income taxes, recorded as a separate component of OCI in stockholders’ equity until realized. Interest and amortization of premiums and discounts for debt securities are included in interest income. Gains and losses on securities sold are determined based on the specific identification method and are included in other income (expense). Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments consist of the following (in thousands): Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $354,347 $ — $— $354,347 Cost Basis Unrealized Gains Unrealized Losses Fair Value Fiscal year-end 2016 Short-term investments: Available-for-sale securities: Commercial paper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . U.S. Treasury and agency obligations . . . . Equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 24,999 125 15,269 Total short-term investments . . . . . . . . . $ 40,393 $ — — 5,213 $5,213 $— — — $— $ 24,999 125 20,482 $ 45,606 108 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 5. SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS (Continued) Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $130,607 $ — $— $130,607 Cost Basis Unrealized Gains Unrealized Losses Fair Value Fiscal year-end 2015 Short-term investments: Available-for-sale securities: Commercial paper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . U.S. Treasury and agency obligations . . . . Corporate notes and obligations . . . . . . . . Equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 9,740 149,708 17,892 15,269 Total short-term investments . . . . . . . . . $192,609 $ — 1,040 52 1,209 $2,301 $— — (2) — $(2) $ 9,740 150,748 17,942 16,478 $194,908 None of the unrealized losses as of October 1, 2016 or October 3, 2015 were considered to be other-than-temporary impairments. The amortized cost and estimated fair value of available-for-sale investments in debt securities as of October 1, 2016 and October 3, 2015, classified as short-term investments on our consolidated balance sheets, were as follows (in thousands): Fiscal year-end 2016 2015 Amortized Cost Estimated Fair Value Amortized Cost Estimated Fair Value Investments in available-for-sale debt securities due in less than one year . . . . . $25,124 $25,124 $148,088 $149,100 Investments in available-for-sale debt securities due in one to five years(1) . . . . $ — $ — $ 29,252 $ 29,330 (1) Classified as short-term investments because these securities are highly liquid and can be sold at any time. During fiscal 2016, we received proceeds totaling $126.0 million from the sale of available-for-sale securities and realized gross gains of less than $0.1 million. During fiscal 2015, we received proceeds totaling $163.8 million from the sale of available-for-sale securities and realized gross gains of less than $0.1 million. 6. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES We maintain operations in various countries outside of the United States and have foreign subsidiaries that manufacture and sell our products in various global markets. The majority of our sales are transacted in U.S. dollars. However, we do generate revenues in other currencies, primarily the Euro, Japanese Yen, South Korean Won and Chinese Renminbi (RMB). As a result, our earnings, cash flows and cash balances are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. We attempt to limit these exposures through financial market instruments. We utilize derivative instruments, primarily forward contracts with maturities of seven months or less, to manage our exposure associated with 109 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 6. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES (Continued) anticipated cash flows and net asset and liability positions denominated in foreign currencies. Gains and losses on the forward contracts are mitigated by gains and losses on the underlying instruments. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. The credit risk amounts represent the Company’s gross exposure to potential accounting loss on derivative instruments that are outstanding or unsettled if all counterparties failed to perform according to the terms of the contract, based on then-current currency rates at each respective date. For derivative instruments that are not designated as hedging instruments, gains and losses are recognized in other income (expense). On August 1, 2016, we purchased forward contracts totaling 670.0 million Euros, with a value date of November 30, 2016, to limit our foreign exchange risk related to the commitment of our term loan (denominated in Euros) in an amount of the Euro equivalent of $750.0 million to finance the U.S. dollar payment for the acquisition of Rofin. As of October 1, 2016, we had recognized an unrealized loss of $2.2 million on these contracts in other income (expense) net. Subsequent to October 1, 2016, we settled these hedges at a net gain of $3.1 million, resulting in a realized gain of $5.3 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. Non-Designated Derivatives The outstanding notional contract and fair value asset (liability) amounts of non-designated hedge contracts, with maximum maturity of seven months, are as follows (in thousands): U.S. Notional Contract Value U.S. Fair Value October 1, 2016 October 3, October 1, October 3, 2016 2015 2015 Euro currency hedge contracts Purchase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sell South Korean WON currency hedge contracts $ 91,108 $(750,454) $ $ 52,699 $ 162 — $(2,234) $ 33 $ — Purchase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sell $ 31,248 253 $ (37,929) $(17,747) $ $ 413 $ (152) $ — $ 30 Chinese RMB currency hedge contracts Sell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (25,237) $(10,900) $ (91) $(106) Japanese Yen currency hedge contracts Purchase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sell 558 — $ $ $ (36,450) $(15,804) $ — $ (343) 8 $ $ (84) Other foreign currency hedge contracts Purchase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sell $ $ 6,033 $ 3,283 (1,775) $ (5,835) $ $ (4) 38 $ (49) $ 146 Designated Derivatives Cash flow hedges related to anticipated transactions are designated and documented at the inception of the hedge when we enter into contracts for specific future transactions. Cash flow hedges 110 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 6. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES (Continued) are evaluated for effectiveness quarterly. The effective portion of the gain or loss on these hedges is reported as a component of OCI in stockholder’s equity and is reclassified into earnings when the underlying transaction affects earnings. We had no cash flow hedges outstanding at October 1, 2016. Changes in the fair value of currency forward contracts due to changes in time value are excluded from the assessment of effectiveness and recognized in other income (expense) as incurred. We classify the cash flows from the foreign exchange forward contracts that are accounted for as cash flow hedges in the same section as the underlying item, primarily within cash flows from operating activities since we do not designate our cash flow hedges as investing or financing activities. The outstanding notional contract and fair value asset (liability) amounts of designated cash flow hedge contracts, which have all been settled prior to October 1, 2016, are as follows (in thousands): U.S. Notional Contract Value U.S. Fair Value October 1, October 3, October 1, October 3, 2016 2015 2016 2015 Japanese Yen currency hedge contracts Sell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $— $(2,903) $— $41 We had entered into certain derivative forward contracts to sell Japanese Yen and buy Euro to hedge revenue exposures related to our photonics-based solutions in Asia. In order to facilitate the hedge, we transacted with counterparties in the U.S. directly and then allocated the hedge contracts to our affiliates through a back-to-back relationship with our German subsidiary. The German subsidiary designated these hedge contracts as cash flow hedges under ASC 815. The hedges were settled prior to October 1, 2016 The fair value of our derivative instruments is included in prepaid expenses and other assets and in other current liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets (See Note 4); such amounts were not material as of October 1, 2016 and October 3, 2015. 111 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 6. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES (Continued) The locations and amounts of designated and non-designated derivative instruments’ gains and losses in the consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended October 1, 2016 and October 3, 2015 were as follows (in thousands): Location in financial statements Fiscal 2016 Fiscal 2015 Fiscal 2014 Derivatives designated as hedging instruments Gains(losses) in OCI on derivatives (effective portion), after tax . . . . . . . OCI Losses reclassified from OCI into income (effective portion) . . . . . . . . Cost of sales Gains(losses) reclassified from OCI into income (effective portion) . . . . . Revenue $ $ $ (28) $ 601 $ (573) — $(1,720) $ — (58) $ 208 $ (13) Gains(losses) recognized in income on derivatives (ineffective portion and amount excluded from effectiveness testing) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other income (expense) Derivatives not designated as hedging $ (29) $ (108) $ 20 instruments Losses recognized in income . . . . . . . . Other income (expense) $(10,527) $(4,320) $(3,105) During the fiscal year ended October 1, 2016 and October 3, 2015, we recognized losses of $31,000 and $107,000, respectively, in other income (expense) as ineffectiveness related to a portion of an anticipated hedged transaction that failed to occur within the original hedge period plus two months. The remainder of the hedged transaction occurred as expected and effective amounts were recognized in revenue or cost of sales as disclosed in the above table. The amounts that will be reclassified from OCI to earnings are generally offset by the recognition of the hedged transactions (e.g., anticipated cost of sales) in earnings, thereby achieving the realization of prices contemplated by the underlying risk management strategies and will vary from the expected amounts presented above as a result of changes in foreign exchange rates. To mitigate credit risk in derivative transactions, we enter into master netting arrangements that allow each counterparty in the arrangements to net settle amounts of multiple and separate derivative transactions under certain conditions. We present the fair value of derivative assets and liabilities within the our consolidated balance sheet on a gross basis even when derivative transactions are subject to master netting arrangements and may otherwise qualify for net presentation. Our derivative contracts do not contain any credit risk related contingent features and do not require collateral or other security to be furnished by us or the counterparties. 112 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 6. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES (Continued) Offsetting of Financial Assets/Liabilities under Master Netting Agreements with Derivative Counterparties as of October 1, 2016 and October 3, 2015 (in thousands): Net Amounts of Derivative Gross Assets Amounts of Presented in Recognized Offset in the Consolidated Derivative the Consolidated Balance Sheets Balance Sheets Assets Gross Amounts Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets Financial Cash Collateral Net Instruments(1) Received Amounts As of October 1, 2016: Foreign exchange contracts . . . . . As of October 3, 2015: Foreign exchange contracts . . . . . $889 $258 $— $— $889 $258 $(860) $(116) $— $— $ 29 $142 (1) The balances at October 1, 2016 and October 3, 2015 were related to derivative liabilities which are allowed to be net settled against derivative assets in accordance with the master netting agreements. Net Amounts Gross of Derivative Amounts of Liabilities Recognized Offset in the Presented in the Consolidated Consolidated Derivative Liabilities Balance Sheets Balance Sheets Gross Amounts Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets Financial Instruments(1) Cash Collateral Paid Net Amounts As of October 1, 2016: Foreign exchange contracts . . . . . As of October 3, 2015: Foreign exchange contracts . . . . . $(3,100) $ (239) $— $— $(3,100) $ (239) $860 $116 $— $(2,240) $— $ (123) (1) The balances at October 1, 2016 and October 3, 2015 were related to derivative assets which are allowed to be net settled against derivative liabilities in accordance with the master netting agreements. 7. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis and between annual tests if events or circumstances indicate that an impairment loss may have occurred, and we write down these assets when impaired. We perform our annual impairment tests during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year using the opening balance sheet as of the first day of the fourth quarter, with any resulting impairment recorded in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year. During fiscal 2016, Coherent had two reporting units: Specialty Laser Systems (‘‘SLS’’) and Commercial Lasers and Components (‘‘CLC’’). In our fiscal 2016 annual testing, we performed a qualitative assessment of the goodwill for our SLS reporting unit during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016 using the opening balance sheet as of the first day of the fourth quarter and concluded that it was more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded its carrying amount. In assessing the qualitative factors, we considered the impact of these key factors: macroeconomic conditions, fluctuations in foreign currency, market and industry conditions, our operating and competitive 113 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 7. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS (Continued) environment, regulatory and political developments, the overall financial performance of the reporting unit including cost factors and budgeted-to-actual revenue results. We also considered our market capitalization, stock price performance and the significant excess between the estimated fair value and carrying value of the SLS reporting unit. Based on our assessment, goodwill in the SLS reporting unit was not impaired as of the first day of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016. As such, it was not necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test at that time. For the CLC reporting unit, we elected to bypass the qualitative assessment and proceed directly to performing the first step of the goodwill impairment test. We performed our Step 1 test using the opening balance sheet as of the first day of the fourth quarter and noted no impairment. We determined the fair value of the CLC reporting unit for the Step 1 test using a 50-50% weighting of the Income (discounted cash flow) approach and Market (market comparable) approach. Management completed and reviewed the results of the Step 1 analysis and concluded that a Step 2 analysis was not required as the estimated fair value of the CLC reporting unit was significantly in excess of its carrying value. Between the completion of that testing and the end of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, we noted no indications of impairment or triggering events with either reporting unit to cause us to review goodwill for potential impairment. The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by segment for fiscal 2016 and 2015 are as follows (in thousands): Commercial Lasers and Components(1) Specialty Laser Systems(2) Total Balance as of September 27, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . Additions (see Note 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Translation adjustments and other . . . . . . . . . . Balance as of October 3, 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . Additions (see Note 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Translation adjustments and other . . . . . . . . . . $6,363 — — 6,363 — — $103,150 1,119 (8,815) $109,513 1,119 (8,815) 95,454 434 (793) 101,817 434 (793) Balance as of October 1, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . $6,363 $ 95,095 $101,458 (1) Gross amount of goodwill for our CLC segment was $25.7 million at both October 1, 2016 and October 3, 2015. At both October 1, 2016 and October 3, 2015, the accumulated impairment loss for the CLC reporting unit was $19.3 million reflecting an impairment charge in fiscal 2009. (2) Gross amount of goodwill for our SLS segment was $97.4 million and $97.8 million at October 1, 2016 and October 3, 2015. At both October 1, 2016 and October 3, 2015, the accumulated impairment loss for the SLS reporting unit was $2.4 million reflecting an impairment charge in fiscal 2003. We evaluate long-lived assets and amortizable intangible assets whenever events or changes in business circumstances or our planned use of assets indicate that their carrying amounts may not be fully recoverable or that their useful lives are no longer appropriate. Reviews are performed to determine whether the carrying values of assets are impaired based on comparison to the undiscounted expected future cash flows identifiable to such long-lived and amortizable intangible assets. If the comparison indicates that impairment exists, the impaired asset is written down to its fair value. 114 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 7. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS (Continued) During fiscal 2016, we wrote down IPR&D of $0.4 million related to our fiscal 2013 acquisition of Innolight Innovative Laser and Systemtechnik GmbH as management abandoned the in-process R&D projects in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016. In fiscal 2015 and 2014, we did not have any impairment of intangible assets as a result of the impairment analysis. The components of our amortizable intangible assets are as follows (in thousands): Existing technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . Customer lists . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Trade name . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . In-process research and development Fiscal year-end 2016 Fiscal year-end 2015 Gross Carrying Amount $70,664 15,968 384 — Accumulated Amortization $(61,133) (11,658) (351) — Net $ 9,531 4,310 33 — Gross Carrying Amount $71,365 16,099 399 375 Accumulated Amortization $(55,452) (9,661) (349) — Net $15,913 6,438 50 375 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $87,016 $(73,142) $13,874 $88,238 $(65,462) $22,776 For accounting purposes, when an intangible asset is fully amortized, it is removed from the disclosure schedule. Amortizable intangible assets include intangible assets acquired through business combinations as well as through direct purchases or licenses. The weighted average remaining amortization period for existing technology is approximately 2.1 years, the weighted average remaining amortization period for customer lists is 2.8 years, and the weighted average remaining amortization period for trade name is 3.1 years. Amortization expense for intangible assets during fiscal years 2016, 2015, and 2014 was $8.5 million, $8.2 million and $9.6 million, respectively, which includes $6.0 million, $6.3 million and $7.5 million, respectively, for amortization of existing technology. The change in accumulated amortization also includes $0.4 million and $2.9 million of foreign exchange impact for fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015, respectively. Estimated amortization expense for the next five fiscal years and all years thereafter are as follows (in thousands): 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Estimated Amortization Expense $ 6,932 4,197 2,107 634 2 2 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $13,874 115 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 8. BALANCE SHEET DETAILS Prepaid expenses and other assets consist of the following (in thousands): Fiscal year-end 2016 2015 Prepaid and refundable income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other taxes receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaid expenses and other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $12,415 10,538 14,120 $ 8,846 6,574 12,874 Total prepaid expenses and other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $37,073 $28,294 Other assets consist of the following (in thousands): Assets related to deferred compensation arrangements (see Note 12) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 26,356 67,157 9,221 $25,131 60,254 3,841 Total other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $102,734 $89,226 Fiscal year-end 2016 2015 In fiscal 2010, we invested $2.0 million in SiOnyx, Inc., a privately-held company. The investment was included in other assets and was being carried on a cost basis. During the third quarter of fiscal 2015 we determined that our investment became other-than temporarily impaired. As a result, during the third quarter of fiscal 2015, we recorded a non-cash charge of $2.0 million in our results of operations to impair this investment. In determining the fair value of the cost method investment, we considered many factors including but not limited to operating performance of the investee, the amount of cash that the investee has on-hand, the ability to obtain additional financing and the overall market conditions in which the investee operates. The fair value of the cost method investment represents a Level 3 valuation as the assumptions used in valuing the investment were not directly or indirectly observable. For our $750.0 million debt financing commitment with certain lenders (See Note 9 ‘‘Borrowings’’), we paid $5.2 million of debt issuance costs in fiscal 2016 and recorded it to other assets. The debt issuance cost related to the term loan facility will be reclassified to debt in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. 116 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 8. BALANCE SHEET DETAILS (Continued) Other current liabilities consist of the following (in thousands): Fiscal year-end 2016 2015 Accrued payroll and benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued expenses and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Warranty reserve (see Note 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other taxes payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Customer deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 47,506 14,700 15,949 3,656 1,597 33,034 $35,504 10,965 15,308 4,888 1,793 16,474 Total other current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $116,442 $84,932 Other long-term liabilities consist of the following (in thousands): Fiscal year-end 2016 2015 Long-term taxes payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred compensation (see Note 12) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Asset retirement obligations liability (see Note 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . Other long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,951 28,313 1,468 4,069 2,796 9,229 $ 7,651 26,691 2,717 3,149 2,654 7,077 Total other long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $48,826 $49,939 9. BORROWINGS We have several lines of credit which allow us to borrow in the applicable local currency. We have a total of $13.2 million of unsecured foreign lines of credit as of October 1, 2016. At October 1, 2016, we had used $1.6 million of these available foreign lines of credit as guarantees. These credit facilities were used in Europe and Japan during fiscal 2016. In addition, our domestic line of credit consists of a $50.0 million unsecured revolving credit account. The agreement will expire on May 31, 2017. The line of credit is subject to covenants related to financial ratios and tangible net worth with which we are currently in compliance. We have an outstanding balance of $20.0 million and have used $1.1 million for letters of credit against our domestic line of credit as of October 1, 2016. On November 4, 2016, we repaid the outstanding balance, plus accrued interest, on our domestic line of credit and terminated the credit facility. On November 7, 2016, we entered into a Credit Agreement (the ‘‘Credit Agreement’’) with Barclays Bank PLC (‘‘Barclays’’), Bank of America, N.A. (‘‘BAML’’) and The Bank of Tokyo- Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. (‘‘MUFG’’). The Credit Agreement provided for a 670.0 million Euro senior secured term loan facility (the ‘‘Euro Term Loan’’) and a $100.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility. On November 7, 2016, the Euro Term Loan was drawn in full and its proceeds were used to finance the acquisition of Rofin and pay related fees and expenses. Also, on November 7, 2016, we used 10.0 million Euro of the capacity under the revolving credit facility for the issuance of a letter of credit. We paid $5.2 million of debt issuance costs in fiscal 2016 and recorded it to other assets on our 117 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 9. BORROWINGS (Continued) consolidated balance sheets as we had not drawn down the debt as of October 1, 2016. The debt issuance cost related to the term loan facility will be reclassified to debt in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, we recorded an interest charge of $1.1 million interest expense within other income (expense) in our consolidated statement of operations related to the debt financing commitment. See Note 16, ‘‘Subsequent Events’’ for further discussion of the issuance of the financing. 10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES Commitments We lease several of our facilities under operating leases and recognize rent expense on a straight-line basis over the life of the leases. Future minimum payments under our non-cancelable operating leases at October 1, 2016 are as follows (in thousands): Fiscal 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thereafter through 2025 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $11,548 9,091 6,379 4,859 2,852 5,125 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $39,854 Rent expense, exclusive of sublease income, was $12.6 million, $11.0 million and $11.0 million in fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. As of October 1, 2016, we had total purchase commitments for inventory of approximately $73.7 million and purchase obligations for fixed assets and services of $12.2 million compared to $25.3 million of purchase commitments for inventory and $9.0 million of purchase obligations for fixed assets and services at October 3, 2015. Contingencies We are subject to legal claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business, such as product liability, employment or intellectual property claims, including, but not limited to, the matters described below. On May 14, 2013, IMRA America (‘‘Imra’’) filed a complaint for patent infringement against two of our subsidiaries in the Regional Court of D¨usseldorf, Germany, captioned In re IMRA America Inc. versus Coherent Kaiserslautern GmbH et. al. 4b O 38/13. The complaint alleges that the use of certain of the Company’s lasers infringes upon EP Patent No. 754,103, entitled ‘‘Method For Controlling Configuration of Laser Induced Breakdown and Ablation,’’ issued November 5, 1997. The patent, now expired in all jurisdictions, is owned by the University of Michigan and licensed to Imra. The complaint seeks unspecified compensatory damages, the cost of court proceedings and seeks to permanently enjoin the Company from infringing the patent in the future. Following the filing of the infringement suit, our subsidiaries filed a separate nullity action with the Federal Patent Court in 118 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued) Munich, Germany requesting that the court hold that the Patent was invalid based on prior art. On October 1, 2015, the Federal Patent Court ruled that the German portion of the Patent was invalid. Imra has appealed this decision to the Federal Court of Justice, the highest civil jurisdiction court in Germany. The infringement action is currently stayed pending the outcome of such appeal. Management has made an accrual with respect to this matter and has determined, based on its current knowledge, that the amount or range of reasonably possible losses in excess of the amounts already accrued is not reasonably estimable. Although we do not expect that such legal claims and litigation will ultimately have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows, an adverse result in one or more matters could negatively affect our results in the period in which they occur. The United States and many foreign governments impose tariffs and duties on the import and export of certain products we sell. From time to time our duty calculations and payments are audited by government agencies. During the second quarter of fiscal 2016, we concluded an audit in South Korea for customs duties and value added tax for the period March 2009 to March 2014. We paid $1.6 million related to this matter in the second quarter of fiscal 2016 and have no remaining accrual at October 1, 2016. On November 7, 2016, we entered into a Credit Agreement with Barclays, BAML and MUFG. See Note 9 ‘‘Borrowings’’ and Note 16 ‘‘Subsequent Events’’ for further discussion of the issuance of the financing. In relation to the acquisition of Rofin, we paid Barclays, our financial advisor, a fee of approximately $9.5 million, $1.0 million of which was paid upon delivery of the fairness opinion in the second quarter of fiscal 2016, and was recorded in the selling, general and administrative line of the consolidated statements of operations, and the remaining portion of which was paid upon consummation of the acquisition in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. We also paid Barclays, BAML and MUFG together approximately $17.0 million and $5.6 million for underwriting and upfront fees, respectively, upon the close of the financing on November 7, 2016. 11. STOCK REPURCHASES On July 25, 2014, our Board of Directors authorized a buyback program whereby we were authorized to repurchase up to $25.0 million of our common stock from time to time through July 31, 2015. During the first and second quarters of fiscal 2015, we repurchased and retired 434,114 shares of outstanding common stock under this plan at an average price of $57.59 per share for a total of $25.0 million. On January 21, 2015, our Board of Directors authorized an additional stock repurchase program to repurchase up to $25.0 million of our outstanding common stock from time to time through January 31, 2016. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, we repurchased and retired 430,675 shares of outstanding common stock under this plan at an average price of $58.05 per share for a total of $25.0 million. On August 25, 2015, our Board of Directors authorized an additional stock repurchase program to repurchase up to $25.0 million of our outstanding common stock from time to time through August 31, 2016. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, we repurchased and retired 437,534 shares of 119 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 11. STOCK REPURCHASES (Continued) outstanding common stock under this plan at an average price of $57.14 per share for a total of $25.0 million. 12. EMPLOYEE STOCK AWARD AND BENEFIT PLANS Deferred Compensation Plans Under our deferred compensation plans (‘‘plans’’), eligible employees are permitted to make compensation deferrals up to established limits set under the plans and accrue income on these deferrals based on reference to changes in available investment options. While not required by the plan, the Company chooses to invest in insurance contracts and mutual funds in order to approximate the changes in the liability to the employees. These investments and the liability to the employees were as follows (in thousands): Fiscal Year-end 2016 2015 Cash surrender value of life insurance contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fair value of mutual funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $13,636 14,399 $12,780 13,891 Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $28,035 $26,671 Total assets, included in: Prepaid expenses and other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,679 26,356 $ 1,540 25,131 Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $28,035 $26,671 Total deferred compensation liability, included in: Other current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,679 28,313 $ 1,540 26,691 Total deferred compensation liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $29,992 $28,231 Fiscal year-end 2016 2015 Life insurance premiums loads, policy fees and cost of insurance that are paid from the asset investments and gains and losses from the asset investments for these plans are recorded as components of other income or expense; such amounts were a net gain of $1.7 million in fiscal year 2016, a net loss of $0.4 million in fiscal year 2015 and a net gain of $4.2 million in fiscal year 2014. Changes in the obligation to plan participants are recorded as a component of operating expenses and cost of sales; such amounts were a loss of $2.1 million in fiscal year 2016, an income of $0.2 million in fiscal year 2015 and a loss of $4.3 million in fiscal year 2014. Liabilities associated with participant balances under our deferred compensation plans are affected by individual contributions and distributions made, as well as gains and losses on the participant’s investment allocation election. 120 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 12. EMPLOYEE STOCK AWARD AND BENEFIT PLANS (Continued) Coherent Employee Retirement and Investment Plan Under the Coherent Employee Retirement and Investment Plan, we match employee contributions to the plan up to a maximum of 4% of the employee’s individual earnings subject to IRS limitations. Employees become eligible for participation on their first day of employment and for Company matching contributions after completing one year of service. Effective November 1, 2016, employees became eligible for participation and Company matching contributions on their first day of employment. The Company’s contributions (net of forfeitures) during fiscal 2016, 2015, and 2014 were $4.1 million, $3.6 million and $3.6 million, respectively. Employee Stock Purchase Plan We have an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (‘‘ESPP’’) whereby eligible employees may authorize payroll deductions of up to 10% of their regular base salary to purchase shares at the lower of 85% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of commencement of the offering or on the last day of the six-month offering period. During fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014, a total of 141,340 shares, 132,004 shares and 134,321 shares, respectively, were purchased by and distributed to employees at an average price of $46.81, $51.34 and $48.68 per share, respectively. At fiscal 2016 year-end, we had 520,560 shares of our common stock reserved for future issuance under the plan. Stock Award Plans We maintain a stock plan for which employees, service providers and non-employee directors are eligible participants. This plan, the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan (the ‘‘2011 Plan’’), provides for grants of options, time-based restricted stock units and performance restricted stock units. In prior years, we had a stock plan for which employees and service providers were eligible participants and a non-employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan for which only non-employee directors were eligible participants. Those prior plans have expired. Under the 2011 Plan, Coherent may grant options and awards (time-based restricted stock units and performance restricted stock units) to purchase up to 6,747,691 shares of common stock, of which 5,230,398 shares remained available for grant at fiscal 2016 year-end. Historically option grants to employees generally expired four years from the original grant date. Since adoption of the 2011 Plan, no stock options have been granted to employees. Director options were previously automatically granted to our non-employee directors. New directors now initially receive an award of restricted stock units of 3,500 shares which vest over a two year period. The annual grant for non-employee directors is 3,500 shares of restricted stock units that vest on February 15 of the calendar year following the grant. Restricted stock awards and restricted stock units are typically subject to vesting restrictions— either time-based or market-based conditions for vesting. Until restricted stock vests, shares (including those issuable upon vesting of the applicable restricted stock unit) are subject to forfeiture if employment or service to the Company terminates prior to the release of restrictions and cannot be transferred. (cid:127) The service based restricted stock awards generally vest within three years from the date of grant. 121 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 12. EMPLOYEE STOCK AWARD AND BENEFIT PLANS (Continued) (cid:127) The service based restricted stock unit awards are generally subject to annual vesting over three years from the date of grant. (cid:127) The performance restricted stock unit award grants are generally either subject to annual vesting over three years from the date of grant or subject to a single vest measurement three years from the date of grant, depending upon achievement of performance measurements based on the performance of the Company’s total shareholder returns (as defined in the plan) compared with the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. Fair Value of Stock Compensation We recognize compensation expense for all share-based payment awards based on the fair value of such awards. The expense is recognized on a straight-line basis per tranche over the respective requisite service period of the awards. Determining Fair Value Valuation and amortization method—We estimate the fair value of employee stock purchase shares using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing formula. This fair value is then amortized on a straight-line basis over the purchase period. Expected Term—The expected term represents the period of our employee stock purchase plan. Expected Volatility—Our process for computing expected volatility considers both historical volatility and market-based implied volatility; however our estimate of expected forfeitures is based on historical employee data and could differ from actual forfeitures. Risk-Free Interest Rate—The risk-free interest rate used in the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation method is based on the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with an equivalent remaining term. The fair values of shares purchased under the employee stock purchase plan for fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014 were estimated using the following weighted-average assumptions: Employee Stock Purchase Plans 2016 Fiscal 2015 2014 Expected life in years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expected volatility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Risk-free interest rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Weighted average fair value per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.5 0.5 35.0% 28.6% 24.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.3% 0.5 $18.59 $14.39 $13.57 Time-Based Restricted Stock Units Time-based restricted stock units are fair valued at the closing market price on the date of grant. 122 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 12. EMPLOYEE STOCK AWARD AND BENEFIT PLANS (Continued) Performance Restricted Stock Units We grant performance restricted stock units to officers and certain employees. The performance stock unit agreements provide for the award of performance stock units with each unit representing the right to receive one share of our common stock to be issued after the applicable award vesting period. The final number of units awarded, if any, for these performance grants will be determined as of the vesting dates, based upon our total shareholder return over the performance period compared to the Russell 2000 Index and could range from no units to a maximum of twice the initial award units. The weighted average fair value for these performance units was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model incorporating the following weighted average assumptions: 2016 Fiscal 2015 2014 Risk-free interest rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Volatility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Weighted average fair value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.2% 27.0% 1.0% 0.6% 28.7% 36.9% $74.48 $70.57 $77.10 We recognize the estimated cost of these awards, as determined under the simulation model, over the related service period, with no adjustment in future periods based upon the actual shareholder return over the performance period. Stock Compensation Expense The following table shows total stock-based compensation expense and related tax benefits included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands): Cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Research and development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selling, general and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2016 $ 2,558 2,268 15,331 (4,896) Fiscal 2015 $ 2,530 1,946 13,756 (4,247) 2014 $ 2,393 2,033 14,471 (5,243) $15,261 $13,985 $13,654 Total stock-based compensation cost capitalized as part of inventory during fiscal 2016 was $2.7 million; $2.6 million was amortized into income during fiscal 2016, which includes amounts capitalized in fiscal 2016 and amounts carried over from fiscal 2015. Total stock-based compensation cost capitalized as part of inventory during fiscal 2015 was $2.5 million; $2.5 million was amortized into income during fiscal 2015, which includes amounts capitalized in fiscal 2015 and amounts carried over from fiscal 2014. Management has made an estimate of expected forfeitures and is recognizing compensation costs only for those equity awards expected to vest. At fiscal 2016 year-end, the total compensation cost related to unvested stock-based awards granted to employees under the Company’s stock plans but not yet recognized was approximately $21.2 million, net of estimated forfeitures of $0.8 million. This cost will be amortized on a straight-line 123 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 12. EMPLOYEE STOCK AWARD AND BENEFIT PLANS (Continued) basis over a weighted-average period of approximately 1.4 years and will be adjusted for subsequent changes in estimated forfeitures. At fiscal 2016 year-end, the total compensation cost related to options to purchase common shares under the ESPP but not yet recognized was approximately $0.2 million. This cost will be amortized on a straight-line basis over a weighted-average period of approximately one month. The stock option exercise tax benefits reported in the statement of cash flows results from the excess tax benefits arising from tax deductions in excess of the stock-based compensation cost recognized, determined on a grant-by-grant basis. During fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014 we have not generated any excess tax benefits as cash flows from financing activities. Stock Awards Activity At fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014 year-end, we had 33,500, 86,000 and 107,000 shares subject to stock options outstanding. The following table summarizes our time-based and performance restricted stock unit activity for fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands, except per share amounts): Time Based Restricted Stock Units Performance Restricted Stock Units Number of Shares Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Number of Shares Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Nonvested stock at September 28, 2013 . . . . . . Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vested(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nonvested stock at September 27, 2014 . . . . . . Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vested(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nonvested stock at October 3, 2015 . . . . . . . . . Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vested(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nonvested stock at October 1, 2016 . . . . . . . . . 453 226 (275) (14) 390 237 (219) (14) 394 270 (192) (13) 459 $48.22 65.80 47.44 56.06 $58.66 64.84 53.62 59.06 $65.17 64.42 61.11 63.89 $66.47 213 52 (33) (3) 229 51 (38) (43) 199 65 (57) (38) 169 $54.63 77.10 43.25 46.99 $61.46 70.57 53.46 53.46 $67.09 74.48 48.48 48.48 $74.10 (1) Service-based restricted stock vested during each fiscal year. Performance awards and units included at 100% of target goal; under the terms of the awards, the recipient may earn between 0% and 200% of the award. Restricted Stock Units are converted into the right to receive common stock upon vesting; prior to issuance, the Company permits the employee holders to satisfy their tax withholding requirements by net settlement, whereby the Company withholds a portion of the shares to cover the applicable taxes based on the fair market value of the Company’s stock at the vesting date. The number of shares 124 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 12. EMPLOYEE STOCK AWARD AND BENEFIT PLANS (Continued) withheld to cover tax payments was 89,000 in fiscal 2016, 91,000 in fiscal 2015 and 118,000 in fiscal 2014; tax payments made were $5.4 million, $5.3 million and $7.8 million, respectively. At fiscal 2016 year-end, 5,230,398 options or restricted stock units were available for future grant under all plans. At fiscal 2016 year-end, all outstanding stock options and restricted stock units have been issued under plans approved by our shareholders. 13. OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE), NET Other income (expense) includes other-net which is comprised of the following (in thousands): Foreign exchange loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gain (loss) on deferred compensation investments, net 2016 Fiscal 2015 2014 $(6,310) $(1,396) $(2,246) (Note 12) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,738 57 (351) 21 4,236 38 Other—net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(4,515) $(1,726) $ 2,028 14. INCOME TAXES The provision for (benefit from) income taxes on income (loss) before income taxes consists of the following (in thousands): 2016 Fiscal 2015 2014 Currently payable: Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (3,069) $ (932) $ 2,492 92 26,885 108 32,189 89 48,039 Deferred: Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (8,131) (439) (1,095) (4,327) (200) (3,679) (2,815) (111) (6,430) 45,059 31,365 29,469 (9,665) (8,206) (9,356) Provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $35,394 $23,159 $20,113 125 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 14. INCOME TAXES (Continued) The components of income (loss) before income taxes consist of (in thousands): 2016 Fiscal 2015 2014 United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (44,029) $ (13,293) $ 166,925 112,861 821 78,398 Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $122,896 $ 99,568 $79,219 The reconciliation of the income tax expense at the U.S. Federal statutory rate (35.0%) to actual income tax expense is as follows (in thousands): Federal statutory tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign taxes at rates less than U.S. rates, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . Research and development credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Release of unrecognized tax benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Release of interest accrued for unrecognized tax benefits . . . . . . . . . . Reversal of Competent Authority . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2016 $43,015 1,441 (5,642) 2,161 (198) (4,408) (428) (4,961) (1,508) 4,328 1,594 Fiscal 2015 $ 34,849 635 (10,558) 2,150 (38) (2,979) (133) (39) (38) — (690) 2014 $27,727 841 (6,974) 1,326 58 (1,797) (778) (51) (289) — 50 Provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $35,394 $ 23,159 $20,113 Effective tax rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28.8% 23.3% 25.4% The effective tax rate on income before income taxes for fiscal 2016 of 28.8% was lower than the statutory rate of 35.0%. This was primarily due to differences related to the benefit of income subject to foreign tax rates that are lower than U.S. tax rates including the Singapore tax exemption, the benefit of foreign tax credits and the benefit of federal research and development tax credits including renewal of the federal research and development tax credits for fiscal 2015. These amounts are partially offset by deemed dividend inclusions under the Subpart F tax rules, stock-based compensation not deductible for tax purposes and limitations on the deductibility of compensation under IRC Section 162(m). In October 2016, Coherent Singapore received an amended Pioneer Status tax exemption from the Singapore authorities effective from fiscal 2012 through fiscal 2021. The tax holiday continues to be conditional upon our meeting certain revenue, business spending and employment thresholds. The impact of this tax exemption decreased Singapore income taxes by approximately $0.7 million in fiscal 2016. There are no tax benefits for fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014 due to the utilization of net operating loss. 126 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 14. INCOME TAXES (Continued) The significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities were (in thousands): Fiscal year-end 2016 2015 Deferred tax assets: Reserves and accruals not currently deductible . . . . . . . . . . Operating loss carryforwards and tax credits . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred service revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventory capitalization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Competent authority offset to transfer pricing tax reserves . . Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 34,800 52,213 2,186 5,001 6,428 1,437 1,043 5,277 $ 31,067 53,386 2,144 1,827 6,128 4,328 — 2,418 Total gross deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108,385 (17,642) 101,298 (15,556) Total net deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred tax liabilities: Gain on issuance of stock by subsidiary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accumulated translation adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total gross deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90,743 85,742 20,781 — 4,273 25,054 20,859 5,117 2,229 28,205 Net deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 65,689 $ 57,537 In determining our fiscal 2016 and 2015 tax provisions under ASC Subtopic 740, we calculated the deferred tax assets and liabilities for each separate tax entity. We then considered a number of factors including the positive and negative evidence regarding the realization of our deferred tax assets to determine whether a valuation allowance should be recognized with respect to our deferred tax assets. We determined that a valuation allowance was appropriate for a portion of the deferred tax assets of our California and certain state research and development tax credits, foreign tax attributes and foreign net operating losses at fiscal 2016 and 2015 year-ends. During fiscal 2016, we increased our valuation allowance on deferred tax assets by $2.1 million to $17.6 million, primarily due to the increase in California and certain state research and development tax credits which are not expected to be recognized. The Company had U.S. federal deferred tax assets related to research and development credits, foreign tax credits and other tax attributes that can be used to offset federal taxable income in future periods. These credit carryforwards will expire if they are not used within certain time periods. As of October 1, 2016, management determined that there is sufficient positive evidence to conclude that it is more likely than not sufficient taxable income will exist in the future allowing us to recognize these deferred tax assets. It is possible that some or all these attributes could ultimately expire unused. If facts and circumstances change in the future, management may determine at that time a valuation allowance is necessary. A valuation allowance would materially increase our tax expense in the period applied and would adversely affect our results of operations and statement of financial condition. Changes in the Company’s underlying facts or 127 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 14. INCOME TAXES (Continued) circumstances, such as the impact of the Rofin-Sinar merger, will be assessed as they occur and the Company will re-evaluate its position accordingly. The net deferred tax asset is classified on the consolidated balance sheets as follows (in thousands): Fiscal year-end 2016 2015 Non-current deferred income tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-current deferred income tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $67,157 (1,468) $60,254 (2,717) Net deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $65,689 $57,537 We have various tax attribute carryforwards which include the following: (cid:127) Foreign gross net operating loss carryforwards are $13.7 million, of which $12.8 million have no expiration date and of which $0.9 million are scheduled to expire beginning in fiscal year 2030. A valuation allowance totaling $5.0 million has been provided against the foreign gross net operating loss carryforwards in certain jurisdictions since the recovery of the carryforwards are uncertain. California gross net operating loss carryforwards are $12.4 million and are scheduled to expire in fiscal year 2032. The tax benefit relating to approximately $7.3 million of the state gross net operating loss carryforwards will be credited to additional paid-in-capital when recognized. (cid:127) Federal gross capital loss carryforwards of $0.8 million are scheduled to expire in fiscal year 2020. State gross capital loss carryforwards of $1.3 million are scheduled to expire in fiscal year 2020. No valuation allowance is recorded against the federal gross capital loss and the state gross capital loss carryforwards since we anticipate that it is more likely than not we will be able to utilize the capital loss in the future. (cid:127) Federal R&D credit carryforwards of $29.1 million are scheduled to expire in fiscal years 2024 to 2036. The tax benefit relating to approximately $0.9 million of the federal tax credit carryforwards will be credited to additional paid-in-capital when recognized. California R&D credit carryforwards of $24.6 million have no expiration date. The tax benefit relating to approximately $0.5 million of the state tax credit carryforwards will be credited to additional paid-in-capital when recognized. A valuation allowance totaling $16.0 million, before federal benefit, has been recorded against California R&D credit carryforwards since the recovery of the carryforwards are uncertain. Other states R&D credit carryforwards of $1.8 million are scheduled to expire in fiscal years 2017 to 2030. A valuation allowance totaling $0.7 million, before federal benefit, has been recorded against certain state R&D credit carryforwards since the recovery of the carryforwards is uncertain. (cid:127) Federal foreign tax credit carryforwards of $14.0 million are scheduled to expire in fiscal years 2018 to 2023. The tax benefit relating to approximately $13.0 million of the federal foreign tax credit carryforwards will be credited to additional paid-in-capital when recognized. We are subject to taxation and file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and in many state and foreign jurisdictions. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, all years prior to fiscal 2011 are closed. The Company agreed to extend the statutes of limitations for its fiscal 2011 and 2012 128 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 14. INCOME TAXES (Continued) U.S. federal tax returns to June 17, 2017 due to an ongoing Advanced Pricing Agreement (‘‘APA’’) between the U.S. and Korea. In March 2016, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued an audit notice and Information Documentation Requests (IDRs) for fiscal 2013. The audit is currently in progress and the statute of limitation was extended to December 31, 2017. In our major foreign jurisdictions and our major state jurisdictions, the years prior to fiscal 2011 and 2012, respectively, are closed to examination. Earlier years in our various jurisdictions may remain open for adjustment to the extent that we have tax attribute carryforwards from those years. In December 2011 and January 2012, three of our German subsidiaries received notices of tax audits for the fiscal years 2006 through 2010. The audits were completed in the third quarter of fiscal 2016. As a result of the settlement, our gross uncertain tax positions decreased by approximately $4.9 million. The net provision impact of the adjustments was immaterial to the consolidated statement of operations. In July 2015 and March 2016, Coherent Kaiserslautern GmbH (formerly Lumera Laser GmbH) received tax audit notices for the fiscal years 2010 to 2014. The audit began in August 2015. We acquired the shares of Lumera Laser GmbH in December 2012 and, pursuant to the terms of the acquisition agreement, we should not have responsibility for any assessments related to the pre-acquisition period. In June, 2016, Coherent Holding GmbH and Coherent Deutschland GmbH each received a tax audit notice for the fiscal years 2011 to 2014. The audit began in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016. Coherent GmbH, Coherent LaserSystems GmbH & Co. KG and Coherent Germany GmbH received audit notices for the period that they were in existence during the fiscal years 2011 through 2014 and the audit work is scheduled to commence in January 2017. We regularly engage in discussions and negotiations with tax authorities regarding tax matters in various jurisdictions and management believes that it has adequately provided reserves for any adjustments that may result from tax examinations. A reconciliation of the change in gross unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, is as follows (in thousands): Balance as of the beginning of the year . . . . . . . . . . . Tax positions related to current year: Fiscal year-end 2016 2015 2014 $22,538 $21,893 $21,378 Additions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reductions 2,468 — Tax positions related to prior year: Additions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reductions Settlements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lapses in statutes of limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 424 (3,239) (1,655) (94) 311 — 855 — — (521) 346 — 235 — — (66) Balance as of end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $20,442 $22,538 $21,893 129 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 14. INCOME TAXES (Continued) As of October 1, 2016, the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits including gross interest and penalties was $20.6 million, of which $15.6 million, if recognized, would affect our effective tax rate. Our total gross unrecognized tax benefit was classified as a long-term taxes payable in the consolidated balance sheets after reduction by certain deferred tax assets. We include interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for income taxes. As of October 1, 2016, the total amount of gross interest and penalties accrued was $0.2 million and it is classified as long-term taxes payable in the consolidated balance sheets. As of October 3, 2015, we had accrued $1.8 million for the gross interest and penalties and it is classified as long-term taxes payable in the consolidated balance sheets. Management believes that it has adequately provided for any adjustments that may result from tax examinations. We regularly engage in discussions and negotiations with tax authorities regarding tax matters in various jurisdictions. It is reasonably possible that certain federal, foreign and state tax matters may be concluded in the next 12 months. A summary of the fiscal tax years that remain subject to examination, as of October 1, 2016, for our major tax jurisdictions is: United States—Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . United States—Various States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Netherlands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Germany . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Japan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . United Kingdom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2011—forward 2012—forward 2011—forward 2011—forward 2010—forward 2015—forward 15. SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION At October 1, 2016, we were organized into two reportable operating segments: Specialty Lasers and Systems (‘‘SLS’’) and Commercial Lasers and Components (‘‘CLC’’). This segmentation reflects the go-to-market strategies for various products and markets. While both segments work to deliver cost-effective solutions, SLS develops and manufactures configurable, advanced-performance products largely serving the microelectronics, scientific research and government programs and OEM components and instrumentation markets. The size and complexity of many of our SLS products require service to be performed at the customer site by factory-trained field service engineers. CLC focuses on higher volume products that are offered in set configurations. The product architectures are designed for easy exchange at the point of use such that product service and repairs are based upon advanced replacement and depot (i.e., factory) repair. CLC’s primary markets include materials processing, OEM components and instrumentation and microelectronics. We have identified SLS and CLC as operating segments for which discrete financial information is available. Both units have dedicated engineering, manufacturing, product business management and product line management functions. A small portion of our outside revenue is attributable to projects and recently developed products for which a segment has not yet been determined. The associated direct and indirect costs are presented in the category of Corporate and other, along with other corporate costs as described below. Our Chief Executive Officer has been identified as the chief operating decision maker (CODM) as he assesses the performance of the segments and decides how to allocate resources to the segments. 130 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 15. SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION (Continued) Income from operations is the measure of profit and loss that our CODM uses to assess performance and make decisions. As assets are not a measure used to assess the performance of the company by the CODM, asset information is not tracked or compiled by segment and is not available to be reported in our disclosures. Income from operations represents the net sales less the cost of sales and direct operating expenses incurred within the operating segments as well as allocated expenses such as shared sales and manufacturing costs. We do not allocate to our operating segments certain operating expenses which we manage separately at the corporate level. These unallocated costs include stock-based compensation and corporate functions (certain research and development, management, finance, legal and human resources) and are included in the results below under Corporate and other in the reconciliation of operating results. Management does not consider unallocated Corporate and other costs in its measurement of segment performance. The following table provides net sales and income from operations for our operating segments a reconciliation of our total income from operations to net income (in thousands): 2016 Fiscal 2015 2014 Net sales: Specialty Laser Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Commercial Lasers and Components . . . . . . . . . $631,313 226,072 $559,593 242,867 $565,552 229,087 Total net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $857,385 $802,460 $794,639 Income (expense) from operations: Specialty Laser Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Commercial Lasers and Components . . . . . . . . . Corporate and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $180,577 3,477 (56,440) $133,506 9,127 (41,886) $117,947 2,688 (43,769) Total income from operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total other income (expense), net . . . . . . . . . . $127,614 (4,718) $100,747 (1,179) $ 76,866 2,353 Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122,896 35,394 99,568 23,159 79,219 20,113 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 87,502 $ 76,409 $ 59,106 Geographic Information Our foreign operations consist primarily of manufacturing facilities and sales offices in Europe and Asia-Pacific. Sales, marketing and customer service activities are conducted through sales subsidiaries throughout the world. Geographic sales information for fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014 is based on the location of the end customer. Geographic long-lived asset information presented below is based on the physical location of the assets at the end of each year. 131 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 15. SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION (Continued) Sales to unaffiliated customers are as follows (in thousands): SALES 2016 Fiscal 2015 2014 United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $204,963 $213,483 $202,205 Foreign countries: South Korea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Japan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Germany . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Europe, other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Asia-Pacific, other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rest of World . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187,908 193,418 63,050 71,427 55,351 36,364 44,904 195,589 135,674 57,548 75,474 53,027 28,036 43,629 167,473 124,765 56,101 86,023 64,648 42,659 50,765 Total foreign countries sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 652,422 588,977 592,434 Total sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $857,385 $802,460 $794,639 Long-lived assets, which include all non-current assets other than goodwill, intangibles and deferred taxes, by geographic region, are as follows (in thousands): LONG-LIVED ASSETS Fiscal year-end 2016 2015 United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 92,771 $ 82,951 Foreign countries: Germany . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Europe, other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Asia-Pacific . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total foreign countries long-lived assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55,786 2,478 11,981 70,245 33,964 2,993 11,504 48,461 Total long-lived assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $163,016 $131,412 Major Customers We had one major customer who accounted for 13%, 17% and 13% of consolidated revenue during fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. We had another major customer who accounted for 16% of consolidated revenue during fiscal 2016. Both customers purchased primarily from our SLS segment. 16. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS Acquisition of Rofin On November 7, 2016, we completed our previously announced acquisition of Rofin pursuant to the Merger Agreement dated March 16, 2016. Rofin is one of the world’s leading developers and manufacturers of high-performance industrial laser sources and laser-based solutions and components. As a condition of the acquisition, we are required to divest ourselves of Rofin’s low power CO2 laser 132 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 16. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (Continued) business based in Hull, United Kingdom, and will report this business separately as a discontinued operation until it is divested. The acquisition was an all-cash transaction at a price of $32.50 per share of Rofin common stock. The aggregate consideration paid by us to the former Rofin stockholders was approximately $904.5 million, excluding related transaction fees and expenses. We also paid $15.3 million due to the cancellation of options held by employees of Rofin. We funded the payment of the aggregate consideration with a combination of our available cash on hand and the proceeds from the Euro Term Loan described below. We are in the process of evaluating the business combination accounting considerations, including the consideration transferred and the initial purchase price allocation. Execution of the Credit Agreement On November 7, 2016, we entered into the Credit Agreement by and among us, Coherent Holding GmbH, as borrower (the ‘‘Borrower’’), and certain of our direct and indirect subsidiaries from time to time party thereto, as guarantors, the lenders from time to time party thereto, Barclays Bank PLC, as administrative agent and L/C Issuer, Bank of America, N.A., as L/C Issuer, and The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., as L/C Issuer. The Credit Agreement provided for a 670.0 million Euro senior secured term loan facility and a $100.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility with a $30.0 million letter of credit sublimit and a $10.0 million swing line sublimit. We may increase the aggregate revolving commitments or borrow incremental term loans in an aggregate principal amount of up to $150.0 million, subject to certain conditions, including obtaining additional commitments from the lenders then party to the Credit Agreement or new lenders. On November 7, 2016, we borrowed the full 670.0 million Euros under the Euro Term Loan and its proceeds were used to finance the acquisition of Rofin and pay related fees and expenses. Also, on November 7, 2016, we used 10.0 million Euro of the capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility for the issuance of a letter of credit. We expect to use future loans under the Revolving Credit Facility, if any, for general corporate purposes. The Credit Agreement replaces our existing $50.0 million Credit Agreement with Union Bank of California. The terms of the Credit Agreement require Borrower to prepay the term loans in certain circumstances, including from excess cash flow beyond a threshold amount, from the receipt of proceeds from certain dispositions or from the incurrence of certain indebtedness, and from extraordinary receipts resulting in net cash proceeds in excess of $10 million in any fiscal year. Borrower has the right to prepay loans under the Credit Agreement in whole or in part at any time without premium or penalty. Revolving loans may be borrowed, repaid and reborrowed until the fifth anniversary of the Closing Date, at which time all outstanding revolving loans must be repaid. The Euro Term Loan matures on the seventh anniversary of the Closing Date, at which time all outstanding principal and accrued and unpaid interest on the Euro Term Loan must be repaid. Loans under the Credit Agreement bear interest, at the Borrower’s option, at a rate equal to either (i) the London interbank offered rate (the ‘‘Eurocurrency Rate’’) or (ii) a base rate (the ‘‘Base Rate’’) equal to the highest of (x) the federal funds rate, plus 0.50%, (y) the prime rate then in effect and (z) the Eurocurrency Rate for loans denominated in U.S. dollars applicable to a one-month interest period, plus 1.0%, in each case, plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin for term loans borrowed as Eurocurrency Rate loans, is 3.50% initially, and following the first anniversary of the Closing Date ranges from 3.00% to 3.50% depending on the consolidated total gross leverage ratio at the time of determination. For term loans borrowed as Base Rate Loans, the applicable margin initially 133 COHERENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 16. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (Continued) is 2.50%, and following the first anniversary of the Closing Date ranges from 2.00% to 2.50% depending upon the consolidated total gross leverage ratio at the time of determination. The applicable margin for revolving loans borrowed as Eurocurrency Rate Loans, ranges from 3.75% to 4.25%, and for revolving loans borrowed as Base Rate Loans, ranges from 2.75% to 3.25%, in each case, based on the consolidated total gross leverage ratio at the time of determination. Interest on Base Rate Loans is payable quarterly in arrears. Interest on Eurocurrency Rate Loans is payable at the end of the applicable interest period. Interest periods for Eurocurrency Rate loans may be, at the Borrower’s option, one, two, three or six months. The Credit Agreement requires the Borrower to make scheduled quarterly payments on the Euro Term Loan of 0.25% of the original principal amount of the Euro Term Loan, with any remaining principal payable at maturity. A commitment fee accrues on any unused portion of the revolving loan commitments under the Credit Agreement at a rate of 0.375% or 0.5% depending on the consolidated total gross leverage ratio at any time of determination. The Borrower is also obligated to pay other customary fees for a credit facility of this size and type. On the Closing Date, we and certain of our direct and indirect subsidiaries, as guarantors, provided an unconditional guaranty of all obligations of the Borrower and the other loan parties arising under the Credit Agreement, the other loan documents and under swap contracts and treasury management agreements with the lenders or their affiliates (with certain limited exceptions). The Borrower and the guarantors have also granted security interests in substantially all their assets to secure such obligations. The Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative covenants, including covenants regarding the payment of taxes and other obligations, maintenance of insurance, reporting requirements and compliance with applicable laws and regulations, and negative covenants, including covenants limiting the ability of us and our subsidiaries to, among other things, incur debt, grant liens, make investments, make certain restricted payments, transact with affiliates, and sell assets. The Credit Agreement also requires us and our subsidiaries to maintain a senior secured net leverage ratio as of the last day of each fiscal quarter of less of than or equal to 3.50 to 1.00. The Credit Agreement contains customary events of default that include, among other things, payment defaults, cross defaults with certain other indebtedness, violation of covenants, inaccuracy of representations and warranties in any material respect, change in control of us and the Borrower, judgment defaults, and bankruptcy and insolvency events. If an event of default exists, the lenders may require the immediate payment of all Obligations, as defined in the Credit Agreement, and may exercise certain other rights and remedies provided for under the Credit Agreement, the other loan documents and applicable law. The acceleration of such obligations is automatic upon the occurrence of a bankruptcy and insolvency event of default. Segment Restatement As a result of the acquisition of Rofin, and subsequent to fiscal 2016 year-end, we announced that in the first quarter of fiscal 2017 we will reorganize our existing two segments into two new reporting segments for the combined company, OEM Laser Systems and Industrial Lasers and Systems. Accordingly, our segment information will be restated retroactively in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. 134 QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED) Summarized quarterly financial data for the years ended October 1, 2016 and October 3, 2015 are as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts): Fiscal 2016: Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income per basic share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income per diluted share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fiscal 2015: Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income per basic share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income per diluted share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter $190,275 83,898 20,286 0.85 0.84 $ $ $200,615 82,319 17,430 0.70 0.69 $ $ $199,882 88,599 17,781 0.74 0.73 $ $ $203,721 83,304 18,413 0.75 0.74 $ $ $218,767 94,559 18,650 0.77 0.76 $ $ $188,502 78,782 13,264 0.54 0.53 $ $ $248,461 114,336 30,785 1.27 1.25 $ $ $209,622 90,994 27,302 1.11 1.10 $ $ 135 Sequentially Exhibit Number 21.1 23.1 24.1 31.1 31.2 32.1 32.2 INDEX TO EXHIBITS Exhibit Subsidiaries Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Power of Attorney (see signature page) Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. All other exhibits required to be filed as part of this report have been incorporated by reference. See item 15 for a complete index of such exhibits. 136 

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above