Company Profi le
C PSI is a leading provider of healthcare information solutions for community hospitals with over 650 client hospitals in 45
states and the District of Columbia. Founded in 1979, the Company is a single-source vendor providing comprehensive
software and hardware products, complemented by complete installation services and extensive support. Its fully integrated,
enterprise-wide system automates clinical and fi nancial data management in each of the primary functional areas of a hospital.
CPSI’s staff of over 1,000 technical, healthcare, medical and business professionals provides system implementation and
continuing support services as part of a comprehensive program designed to respond to clients’ information needs in a
constantly changing healthcare environment. For more information, visit www.cpsinet.com.
Annual Meeting
The annual meeting of stockholders will be held on May 5, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. Central Time at the Mobile Convention
Center, One South Water Street, Mobile, Alabama.
Financial Highlights
(In thousands, except per share data)
Total sales revenues
Total cost of sales
Gross profi t
Total operating expenses
Operating income
Interest income, net
Net income before taxes
Provision for income taxes
Net income
Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic
Diluted
Years Ended December 31,
2009
2010
$ 153,247
$ 127,742
88,863
64,384
35,287
29,097
674
29,771
11,033
18,738
1.71
1.71
10,963
10,963
$
$
$
74,483
53,259
29,890
23,369
727
24,096
8,913
15,183
1.39
1.39
10,954
10,955
$
$
$
Revenues ($ in thousands)
Net Income ($ in thousands)
10
09
08
07
06
$153,247
$127,742
$119,664
$110,013
$115,974
Hospital Clients
10
09
08
07
06
$18,738
$15,183
$15,438
$12,916
$15,815
10
09
08
07
06
670
654
650
630
615
Locations
Customer Locations at December 31, 2010
7
4
4
15
4
9
2
7
5
1
5
6
2
12
9
27
5
8
10
31
15
19
11
39
26
14
26
77
22
41
15
13
44
36
11
5
4
8
15
DC -3
18
2
7
12
7
7
Stock Performance Graph
The following graph sets forth the cumulative total return (assuming reinvestment of dividends) to our stockholders during the period
beginning December 31, 2005, and ending on December 31, 2010, compared to an overall stock market index (NASDAQ Composite Index),
and the NASDAQ Computer and Data Processing Group.
$160
$140
$120
$100
$80
$60
$40
$20
$0
12/05
12/06
12/07
12/08
12/09
12/10
Computer Programs and Systems, Inc.
S&P 500
NASDAQ Computer and Data Processing
Computer Programs and Systems, Inc.
S&P 500
NASDAQ Computer and Data Processing
12/05
$ 100.00
100.00
100.00
$
12/06
85.07
115.80
112.40
12/07
12/08
$ 59.93 $ 75.07
76.96
122.16
77.33
134.94
12/09
12/10
$ 134.42 $ 141.44
111.99
135.78
97.33
122.47
Letter to Shareholders:
Simply put, 2010 was an outstanding year for CPSI. We enjoyed strong sales growth across our entire line of products and
services for community hospitals. We continue to expand our customer base in an increasingly competitive market. Add-on sales
to our existing clients are at an all-time high and continue to grow as we have added new applications and services in anticipation
of market demands. Our performance in 2010 was the result of two years of positioning our company to take advantage of the
substantial opportunities that now exist in the healthcare information technology sector as well as the successful execution of that
strategy at every level throughout the Company.
Our financial performance last year reflected our success. Revenues for 2010 increased to $153 million, up 20% from
the preceding year. Our net income in 2010 was $19 million, while earnings per share rose to $1.71. In addition, in 2010, we
continued to pay our shareholders an annual dividend of $1.44.
As I suggested earlier, our success in 2010 was not unexpected. And, we fully expect it to continue in 2011 and beyond. We
anticipated a unique growth opportunity arising from the federal government’s 2009 economic stimulus package and invested
in people and technology to make certain that our company was as prepared as possible. As a result, we are now taking full
advantage of being in the proverbial right place at the right time. But just as importantly, our company is positioned with the right
combination of products and expertise as well as sufficient capacity of trained staff to meet the needs of clients who have greater
incentives than ever before to seek the solutions we offer.
Federal stimulus funds made available to hospitals and physicians under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
(ARRA) for electronic medical record (EMR) adoption are now flowing. In fact, several CPSI customers have received funds
already, and we fully expect many more to apply this year and in years to come. CPSI met the commitment it made to its clients
when the ARRA was first enacted by achieving certification in 2010 from the Department of Health and Human Services. Both
our hospital and medical practice systems were certified as complete EMRs, meeting all the criteria necessary for our customers to
qualify for incentive payments under the ARRA. In order for our clients and potential clients to receive the significant stimulus
funds that are available, they must meet rigorous “meaningful use” criteria related to their use of a certified system. We believe our
depth of experience gives CPSI a distinct advantage, both in assisting our existing clients in meeting these standards as well as in
competitive situations for prospective clients.
For example, one area receiving a great deal of attention under the “meaningful use” criteria is a requirement that hospitals have
a certain percentage of orders entered electronically by their physicians using computerized physician order entry (CPOE) systems.
Successful implementation of CPOE systems has been very difficult for hospitals over the years due to physician resistance to the
use of these systems. However, CPSI has been successfully implementing CPOE systems for a number of years, with more than
200 CPOE systems in use at client hospitals. This depth of experience, which we believe exceeds that of our competitors, gives
both existing and prospective clients confidence in our ability to assist them in meeting the “meaningful use” criteria.
As current customers added software in order to meet the criteria to receive stimulus funds or when new clients came to CPSI
to ensure that they would qualify for stimulus funding, our business grew substantially. In 2010, we installed our financial and
patient accounting systems in 44 hospitals and our core clinical department applications in 53, while 61 hospitals implemented
Nursing Point of Care and another 89 hospitals installed our CPOE system. We were able to accommodate this growth seamlessly
because we had increased our staff by more than 300 members over the past two years to make certain that we would be able to
take full advantage of this opportunity.
The increase in EMR adoption in hospitals has already produced a shortage of the clinical IT professionals needed to
implement and maintain these systems. We believe this vacuum has created an opportunity for CPSI to step in and fill this gap
through our recently offered IT managed and professional services on either a short-term project management basis or for the
longer term. In addition to clinical professionals, we are also offering to reduce the day-to-day technical infrastructure support
requirements of the hospital IT staff to allow them to focus more on supporting the increased number of end users with which they
are now faced.
With respect to our current service offerings, our customers continue to leverage their established relationship with CPSI as
they increase their use of the comprehensive business solutions through our Business Management Services Division. This business
unit, which has enjoyed steady growth each year since its inception in 2003, grew again last year with 29 new contracts, including
nine for full business management services.
Recently, HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said that 2011 “will begin a whole new chapter in health information technology.”
CPSI has been on the leading edge of this revolution for years. In fact, our client hospitals have adopted EMRs at a higher rate
than the national average for all hospitals. Now that the market is moving toward the solutions we offer, we believe our experience,
our product suite and our track record of successful implementations put us in an enviable position.
We believe that our future is as filled with promise and opportunity as our past year was filled with success. As we work to
make the most of these opportunities, we remain profoundly grateful for your support and your investment.
Sincerely,
Sincerely,
J. Boyd Douglas
J. Boyd Douglas
President and Chief Executive Officer
Directors and Offi cers
Officers
J. Boyd Douglas, Jr.
President and
Chief Executive Offi cer
David A. Dye
Chief Financial Offi cer
Charles P. Huffman
Retired Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Offi cer
EnergySouth, Inc.
Ernest F. Ladd, III
Retired Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Offi cer
Dravo Corporation
William R. Seifert, II
Retired Executive Vice President
Regions Bank
Chairman
South Alabama Advisory Board
of Regions Bank
Board of Directors
David A. Dye
Chairman and Chief
Financial Officer
Computer Programs and
Systems, Inc.
W. Austin Mulherin, III
Attorney
Frazer, Greene, Upchurch &
Baker, LLC
John C. Johnson
Real Estate Appraiser
Courtney & Morris
Appraisals, Inc.
J. Boyd Douglas, Jr.
President and
Chief Executive Offi cer
Computer Programs and
Systems, Inc.
Corporate Data
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Grant Thornton LLP
1100 Peachtree Street, Suite 1200
Atlanta, GA 30309
Transfer Agent
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company
59 Maiden Lane
Plaza Level
New York, NY 10038
(866) 668-6550
Legal Counsel
Maynard, Cooper & Gale, P.C.
1901 Sixth Avenue North
Suite 2400, Regions/Harbert Plaza
Birmingham, AL 35203-2618
Corporate Headquarters
Computer Programs and Systems, Inc.
6600 Wall Street
Mobile, AL 36695
(251) 639-8100
www.cpsinet.com
Common Stock
Computer Programs and Systems, Inc.’s common
stock is traded on The NASDAQ Stock Market’s
Global Select Market under the symbol “CPSI.”
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
È ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010
OR
‘ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM
TO
Commission file number: 000-49796
.
COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND SYSTEMS, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
6600 Wall Street, Mobile, Alabama
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
74-3032373
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
36695
(Zip Code)
(251) 639-8100
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class
Common Stock, par value $.001 per share
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes ‘ No È
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes ‘ No È
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes È No ‘
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes ‘ No ‘
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by
reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. È
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or
a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting
company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (check one):
Large accelerated filer ‘
Non-accelerated filer ‘
(Do not check if smaller reporting company)
Accelerated filer È
Smaller reporting company ‘
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ‘ No È
The aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant at June 30, 2010 was $422,184,980.
As of March 4, 2011 the registrant had outstanding 10,962,874 shares of its common stock.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE IN THIS FORM 10-K:
Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 5, 2011 are
incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.
Item No.
Page No.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PART I
1.
Business
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Industry Dynamics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Our Solution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Strategy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Our Products and Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
System Implementation and Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Product Development and Enhancement
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Customers, Sales and Marketing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Competition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Health Information Security and Privacy Practices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Internal Management Control System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Intellectual Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Employees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Executive Officers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Company Website . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1A. Risk Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1B. Unresolved Staff Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.
Legal Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.
Reserved . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.
PART II
5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases
of Equity Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Selected Financial Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.
7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
9.
Disclosure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9A. Controls and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9B. Other Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PART III
10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
11. Executive Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Principal Accountant Fees and Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
14.
PART IV
15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SIGNATURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
i
1
1
1
3
4
5
12
13
13
14
14
15
15
16
16
16
18
18
25
25
26
26
27
28
29
40
41
63
63
64
65
65
65
66
66
67
68
* Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 5, 2011
are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K.
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the “safe
harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements
can be identified generally by the use of forward-looking terminology and words such as “expects,”
“anticipates,” “estimates,” “believes,” “predicts,” “intends,” “plans,” “potential,” “may,” “continue,” “should,”
“will” and words of comparable meaning. Without limiting the generality of the preceding statement, all
statements in this Annual Report relating to estimated and projected earnings, margins, costs, expenditures, cash
flows, growth rates and future financial results are forward-looking statements. We caution investors that any
such forward-looking statements are only predictions and are not guarantees of future performance. Certain risks,
uncertainties and other factors may cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-
looking statements. Such factors may include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
overall business and economic conditions affecting the healthcare industry;
potential effects of the federal health care reform legislation enacted in 2010, and implementing
regulations, on the businesses of our hospital customers;
funding uncertainties associated with, and potential expenditures required by, the American Recovery
and Reinvestment Act of 2009 in connection with the adoption of electronic health records;
saturation of our target market and hospital consolidations;
changes in customer purchasing priorities, capital expenditures and demand for information technology
systems;
competition with companies that have greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we
have;
failure to develop new technology and products in response to market demands;
fluctuations in quarterly financial performance due to, among other factors, timing of customer
installations;
failure of our products to function properly resulting in claims for medical losses;
government regulation of our products and customers, including changes in healthcare policy affecting
Medicare reimbursement rates;
government regulation of the healthcare and health insurance industries;
changes in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America;
general economic conditions, including changes in the financial markets that may affect the availability
and cost of credit to us or our customers; and
interruptions in our power supply and/or telecommunications capabilities.
For more information about the risks described above and other risks affecting us, see “Risk Factors”
beginning on page 18 of this Annual Report. We also caution investors that the forward-looking information
described herein represents our outlook only as of this date, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise
any forward-looking statements to reflect events or developments after the date of this Annual Report.
i
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Overview
PART I
We are a healthcare information technology company that designs, develops, markets, installs and supports
computerized information technology systems to meet the unique demands of small and midsize hospitals. Our
target market includes acute care community hospitals with 300 or fewer beds and small specialty hospitals. We
are a single-source vendor providing comprehensive software and hardware products, complemented by data
conversion, complete installation, extensive support and information technology management and professional
services. Our fully integrated, enterprise-wide system automates the management of clinical and financial data
across the primary functional areas of a hospital. In addition, we provide services that enable our customers to
outsource certain data-related business processes which we can perform more efficiently. We believe our
products and services enhance hospital performance in the critical areas of clinical care, revenue cycle
management, cost control and regulatory compliance. From our initial hospital installation in 1981, we have
grown to serve over 650 hospital customers across 46 states and the District of Columbia. In 2010, we generated
revenues of $153.2 million from the sale of our products and services.
Industry Dynamics
The healthcare industry is the largest industry in the United States economy. According to the Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services, or “CMS,” the U.S. spent $2.5 trillion on healthcare in 2009, or approximately
17.6% of the U.S. gross domestic product. For 2010, these expenditures are projected to have been $2.6 trillion,
or 17.6% of the U.S. gross domestic product. CMS estimates that by fiscal 2019 total U.S. healthcare spending
will reach $4.6 trillion, or 19.6% of the estimated U.S. gross domestic product.
Hospital services represents one of the largest categories of total healthcare expenditures. According to
CMS, in fiscal 2011, spending on hospital services will amount to approximately $827 billion, or 30.6% of total
healthcare expenditures. According to the American Hospital Association, there are approximately 5,010
community hospitals in the United States that are in our target market of hospitals with 300 or fewer acute care
beds. In addition, there is a market of small specialty hospitals that focus on discrete medical areas such as
surgery, rehabilitation and psychiatry.
Notwithstanding the size and importance of the healthcare industry within the United States economy, the
industry is constantly challenged by changing economic dynamics, increased regulation and pressure to improve
the quality of healthcare. These challenges are particularly significant for the hospitals in our target market due to
their more limited financial and human resources. However, we believe healthcare providers can successfully
address these issues with the help of advanced medical information systems. Specific examples of the challenges
and opportunities facing healthcare providers include the following.
Changing Economic Dynamics. Community hospitals typically generate a significant portion of their
revenues from beneficiaries of the Medicare program. Consequently, even small changes in this federal program
have a disproportionately larger impact on community hospitals as compared to larger facilities where greater
portions of their revenues are typically generated from beneficiaries of private insurance programs. Medicare
funding and reimbursements fluctuate year to year and, with the anticipated growth in healthcare costs, will
continue to be scrutinized as the federal government attempts to control the costs and growth of the program. The
Medicaid program, which is a federal/state program managed by the individual states and dependent in part on
funding from the states, also continues to struggle due to the increasing cost of healthcare and limited state
revenues. In addition to issues in state funding, the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, which included cuts of
$6.4 billion and $4.7 billion from Medicare and Medicaid, respectively, over the five-year period from 2006 to
2010, has cut deeper into Medicaid reimbursements, and the gains made in Medicare reimbursements are being
adversely affected. Furthermore, federal and state budget shortfalls could lead to potential reductions in funding
1
for Medicare and Medicaid. Reductions in reimbursements from Medicare and Medicaid could lead to hospitals
postponing expenditures on information technology. We expect that the demand for Medicare and Medicaid
services will increase as a result of the recent economic recession and increased unemployment. According to the
American Hospital Association (AHA), a one percentage point increase in unemployment increases enrollment in
Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) by approximately one million lives. With national
unemployment at close to 10 percent, more pressure is being put on America’s hospitals as they struggle to serve
the growing numbers of uninsured patients according to the AHA.
Additionally, the reduced availability of credit since 2007 has increased the costs to hospitals of borrowing
money and made it more difficult to find the financing for necessary facility and technology improvements.
According to a study conducted by the AHA in April 2009, due to the credit crisis and a significant increase in
uncompensated care, 80% of the hospitals in the United States of America had cut capital spending for facility
upgrades, clinical technology and/or information technology.
Despite the above projections, according to a survey published by Premier healthcare alliance in its
September 2010 Economic Outlook analysis, 69% of healthcare representatives said capital budgets in 2010 will
remain flat or increased compared to 2009. Overall, 42% of respondents suggested an increase in spending in
2010, while 32% suggested a decrease. The survey also found most hospital executives have health care reform
at the top of the list of concerns, with more than 80% considering healthcare reform and changes in
reimbursement and EHR implementation and data storage as the most important health care trends today. In
addition, 73% of hospital executives anticipate that healthcare reform and EHR implementation will have the
greatest impact on their hospitals’ financial performance over the next year.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. On February 17, 2009, President Barack Obama
signed into law the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the “ARRA”). This $787 billion
economic stimulus package includes a number of health care policy provisions, including approximately $19
billion in funding over a ten-year period for health information technology infrastructure and Medicare and
Medicaid incentives to encourage doctors, hospitals, and other providers to use health information technology to
electronically exchange patients’ health information, through the development of health information exchanges
(“HIE”) and the adoption of electronic health records (“EHR”). Approximately $2 billion of the total funding
amount is in appropriated funds for discretionary grants, loans and technical assistance programs designed to aid
providers with the adoption of EHR and the development of HIE. These funds are being disbursed by various
agencies within the Department of Health and Human Services, either directly to providers – including private
physician offices – or to other entities like states or non-profit organizations. The remaining allocated amounts
will take the form of Medicare and Medicaid payment incentives. The ARRA identifies four priority areas for
spending with respect to health information technology: (1) establishing HIE; (2) EHR adoption; (3) workforce
training; and (4) new technology research and development. In order to qualify for EHR funding, providers are
required to connect to an HIE, which means funding is dependent on state action to establish HIEs. The payment
incentives started to become available to our customers in February 2011. The ARRA includes payment
incentives for critical access hospitals that are meaningful users of EHR. During December 2010, both our
hospital and medical practice EHR solutions were certified as a complete EHR by the Certification Commission
for Health Information Technology (CCHIT®). Receiving this certification for both our hospital and ambulatory
EHR products ensures that hospitals and other healthcare providers using our EHR systems will be considered
“meaningful users” of EHR and qualify for ARRA reimbursements. We believe that this certification of our EHR
system and the ARRA has and will continue to have a positive impact on our business and the businesses of the
community hospitals that comprise our target market.
Continued Push for Improved Patient Care. With pressure mounting to reduce medical errors and improve
patient safety, hospitals are actively seeking information technology solutions for clinical decision support. This
migration toward clinical decision support solutions is further supported by the ARRA. The provisions of the
2
ARRA offer incentives for hospitals to become meaningful users of EHR’s through September 2015, and we
already have some hospital customers who have received these incentive payments as of February 2011.
However, the ARRA incentive program is set to expire as of October 1, 2015, and hospitals and healthcare
providers which have not implemented EHR’s with HIE connectivity will be penalized with lower Medicare
payment levels after that date.
The ARRA also included $87 billion for state Medicaid programs through a temporary increase in the
Medicaid matching funds, known as the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP). This temporary FMAP
increase was available to states for the nine fiscal quarters beginning on October 1, 2008 through December 31,
2010. All states received an additional increase in their current federal matching rate of 6.2 percent for this time
period. States received additional federal funds (bonus funds) through the matching rate based on the state’s rate
of increase in unemployment. These bonus funds represented approximately 35% of the $87 billion. As the
federal government seeks to limit deficit spending in coming years due to fiscal restraints, it will likely continue
to cut entitlement spending programs such as Medicare and Medicaid matching grants which will place further
cost pressures on hospitals and other healthcare providers.
While economic, regulatory and consumer pressures such as those described above have increased rapidly
over the last several years, we believe healthcare organizations have historically underinvested in information
technology and services compared to other industries. This underinvestment has caused healthcare providers to
rely on non-integrated, complex and inefficient information systems. A hospital’s failure to adequately invest in
modern medical information systems could result in fewer patient referrals, cost inefficiencies, lower than
expected reimbursement, increased malpractice risk and possible regulatory infractions.
In the face of decreasing revenue and increasing pressure to improve patient care, healthcare providers are
in need of management tools that (1) increase efficiency in the delivery of healthcare services, (2) reduce medical
errors, (3) effectively track the cost of delivering services so those costs can be properly managed and
(4) increase the speed and rate of reimbursement. Despite challenging economic conditions, we believe the
industry will increase its adoption of information technology as a management tool, particularly as a result of
ARRA. We further believe these dynamics should allow for future revenue growth.
Our Solution
We have tailored an information technology solution that effectively addresses the specific needs of small
and midsize hospitals. Due to their smaller operating budgets, community hospitals have limited financial and
human resources to operate manual or inefficient information systems. However, these hospitals are expected to
achieve the same quality of care and regulatory compliance as larger hospitals, placing them in a particularly
difficult operating environment.
We believe that the CPSI solution meets this challenge. We provide fully integrated, enterprise-wide,
HIPAA compliant medical information systems and services that collect, process, retain and report data in the
primary functional areas of a hospital, from patient care to clinical processing to administration and accounting.
As a key element of our complete solution, we provide ongoing customer service through regular interaction with
customers, customer user groups and extensive customer support. Further, we offer business management
services that allow customers to avoid some of the fixed costs of a business office. We are capable of providing a
single-source solution for small and midsize hospitals, making us a partner in their initiatives to improve
operations and medical care.
Our customers continuously communicate with us through our support teams and through organized user
groups, allowing us to continue to provide a state-of-the-art solution that meets their specific needs. By
remaining sensitive and responsive to the ever-changing demands of our customers and regularly updating our
products, we believe we provide an information technology solution that meets the needs of community
hospitals. Our business has continued to grow because we have successfully addressed the needs of community
3
hospitals for fully integrated, enterprise-wide information systems that allow them to improve operating
effectiveness, reduce costs and improve the quality of patient care.
In November 2010, we began offering new information technology management and professional services.
With the federal government’s healthcare agenda focused on hospitals adopting electronic health records,
community hospitals are faced with a significant undertaking in implementing EHR technology. As a result, we
recognize that it makes sense for many of our customers to rely on third-party service organizations to help them
identify their IT objectives, define the best way to meet those objectives and manage the resulting projects and
associated technologies. Our current offerings in this area include a comprehensive suite of services, including
network management and monitoring, server and storage management, hosted email, firewall management,
malware protection, data center services, help desk solutions and other services. Professional engagements such
as IT staffing, IT infrastructure assessment and project management for clinical point of entry (CPOE)
implementation, “meaningful use” achievement of EHR and others are individually customized to meet specific
client requirements.
Strategy
Our objective is to continue to grow as a leading provider of healthcare information technology systems and
services to small and midsize hospitals by following the same strategy that we have successfully pursued for over
thirty years, the key elements of which are described below.
Deliver a Single-Source Solution. When a customer purchases the CPSI system, we provide everything
necessary for the customer to implement and use our system. We deliver the application software, computer
hardware, peripherals, forms and supplies used in the comprehensive information network. Our installation teams
work extensively with each customer to convert existing data to the new system, to install all of the necessary
equipment and to train hospital personnel to use our system. After installation, our support teams answer and
address customer questions and issues related to any aspect of the system. We also offer customers additional
services such as business office management, electronic billing and ISP services. We believe our single-source
approach to delivering a complete information system makes our system easier and more convenient for
customers to understand and manage, which results in greater customer satisfaction and retention.
Provide Enterprise-Wide, Fully Integrated Software Applications. We have developed all of our software
products internally as part of our fully integrated system architecture. Our experience has taught us that using a
fully integrated system in the primary functional areas of a hospital ensures compatibility among applications and
avoids pitfalls associated with interfacing disparate systems. Our system utilizes one central database where
information is stored and used by all of our software applications. With our single database model, our systems
provide secure, real-time access to all information across multiple applications for all those needing such access,
including physicians, nurses, laboratory technicians, pharmacists, clinicians and other users. The enterprise-wide,
fully integrated nature of our system also allows customers to monitor user access to information for purposes of
compliance with new federal and state privacy regulations.
Maintain Commitment to Customer Oriented Operating Philosophy. A key factor in our success has been
our focus on customer service and support. We make available to our customers experienced support teams that
can assist with any question or problem. We currently have a greater than one to one support staff to customer
ratio. Our support teams are extensively trained, and our employees are generally promoted from within so that
they have a thorough knowledge of our system and a commitment to our culture. Because all of our customers
use the same version of our system, our support teams can be more effective by maintaining a complete
understanding of a single system. As part of our commitment to system support, we actively solicit customer
feedback regarding ways in which we can improve the effectiveness and efficiency of our systems. To further
this goal, we have organized our customers into a national user group to promote the exchange of information
regarding our system and to identify product enhancements based on our customers’ operational experiences. We
believe our user group concept is a key component of our success by positively impacting customer satisfaction
4
and retention and by enhancing product development and system functionality. We will continue to focus on our
national user group as a key component to our goal of maintaining and growing our customer base and market
share.
Expand Presence in Target Market. We will continue to target small to midsize domestic hospitals of 300 or
fewer acute care beds. We believe this market of over 5,000 community hospitals nationwide has been
traditionally overlooked and underserved by other healthcare technology companies. In addition, a number of our
customers are small specialty hospitals that focus on discrete medical areas such as surgery, rehabilitation and
psychiatry. We intend to continue gaining customers from this market segment. Our system can help these
smaller hospitals reduce costs and increase their operating efficiencies. We believe our personalized marketing
approach and emphasis on customer relationships are attractive to the management of these hospitals. We also
believe our system is well-suited to hospitals of this size because they typically demonstrate a greater
commitment than larger hospitals to the concept of an enterprise-wide, fully integrated system. In addition, we
will continue to sell additional services and software products to our existing customers who have not purchased
our complete package of services and software applications.
Emphasize Recurring Revenue Opportunities. In addition to revenues from new system installations, we
have developed and will continue to develop sources of recurring revenues. Our current principal source of
recurring revenues is our support and maintenance fees paid by existing customers. As our customer base grows,
our recurring revenues from support and maintenance fees should also grow. We believe growth in recurring
revenues will also continue to come from our business management services and information technology
management and professional services, which we market to our existing customers as well as new customers.
Our business management services include electronic billing, patient statement processing, accounts receivable
management, payroll processing, ISP services and web site hosting. Our information technology management
and professional services include managed network services, server and storage management, desktop support, as
well as communications, connectivity, security and data center services. We also provide our software products
on a “Software as a Service” or “SaaS” basis. When we provide SaaS services, we maintain a customer’s
computer server in our facility and provide our system to the customer through remote access. Instead of the
one-time system purchase price, these customers pay a monthly fee for the term of the SaaS customer agreement,
generating recurring revenues.
Our Products and Services
Software Systems
We offer a full array of software applications designed to streamline the flow of information to the primary
functional areas of community hospitals in one fully integrated system. We intend to continue to enhance our
existing software applications and develop new applications as required by evolving industry standards and the
changing needs of our customers. Pursuant to our customer support agreements, we provide our customers with
software enhancements and upgrades periodically on a when-and-if-available basis. See “Support and
Maintenance Services.” These enhancements enable each customer, regardless of its original installation date, to
have the benefit of the most advanced CPSI products available. Our software applications:
•
•
•
•
•
provide automated processes that improve clinical workflow and support clinical decision-making;
allow healthcare providers to efficiently input and easily access the most current patient medical data in
order to improve the quality of care and patient safety;
integrate clinical, financial and patient information to promote efficient use of time and resources,
while eliminating dependence on paper medical records;
provide tools that permit healthcare organizations to analyze past performance, model new plans for
the future and measure and monitor the effectiveness of those plans;
provide for rapid and cost-effective implementation, whether through the installation of an in-house
system or through our SaaS services; and
5
•
increase the flow of information by replacing centralized and limited control over information with
broad-based, secure access by clinical and administrative personnel to data relevant to their functional
areas.
Our software applications are grouped for support purposes according to the following functional categories:
•
•
Patient Management
Financial Accounting
• Clinical
•
Patient Care
• Enterprise Applications
Due to the integrated nature of the CPSI system, our software applications are not marketed as distinct
products, and our sales force attempts to sell all applications to each customer as a single product. New
customers must purchase from us and install the core applications of patient management and financial
accounting and all hardware necessary to run these applications. In addition to the core applications, customers
may also acquire one or more of our clinical, patient care and enterprise applications. Over one-third of our
customers have purchased a combination of applications that meet their enterprise-wide information technology
needs.
The general functional categories, as well as the software applications in each of these categories, are
described below.
Patient Management. Our patient management software enables a hospital to identify a patient at any point
in the healthcare delivery system and to collect and maintain patient information throughout the entire process of
patient care on an enterprise-wide basis. The single database structure of our software permits authorized hospital
personnel to simultaneously access appropriate portions of a patient’s record from any point on the system. The
patient management software performs the following functions:
Registration
•
records patient admissions, discharges and transfers
Patient Accounting
Health Information
Management
Patient Index
Electronic Claims
Processing
Medical Practice
Management
• manages patient status, room assignments and recurring charges
•
•
•
•
•
keeps information available to all hospital personnel in formats
designed for their particular requirements
records patient charges and maintains accounts receivable
information including aging, service charges and cash receipts
generates and processes insurance claims
supports the operational needs of the modern medical records
department including transcription, case indexing/abstracting and
statistical reporting
tracks deficiencies in a patient’s chart and provides chart location
information
• maintains a master index of hospital patients and provides immediate
online access to patient financial and medical data associated with a
patient stay
provides a computer-to-computer link with intermediaries for
Medicare and other payers for the submission of claims
•
•
•
supports patient account management and insurance processing for
single and multiple practices/clinics
supports both hospital-based and remote practices/clinics
6
We also offer the following optional products that may be purchased as part of our core patient management
suite:
Enterprise Wide
Scheduling
Contract
Management
Quality Improvement
• maintains all patient scheduling information
•
•
tracks patients enrolled in managed care plans and conforms billing
functions to such plans
automates hospital-wide total quality management and reporting
requirements for utilization activity, risk management, infection
surveillance and all accreditation review functions
Financial Accounting. Our financial accounting software provides a variety of business office applications
designed to efficiently track and coordinate information needed for managerial decision-making. Our financial
accounting software:
Executive Information
System
General Ledger
Accounts Payable
Payroll/Personnel
Time and Attendance
Electronic Direct
Deposits
Human Resources
Budgeting
Fixed Assets
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
summarizes daily financial transactions regarding patient revenues,
receipts, census statistics and billing information for ready access by
hospital administrators
provides timely, accurate financial information generated from daily
hospital operations
formats financial statements to the specifications of each user and is
able to generate up to 999 different user-defined reports
processes vendor invoices and payments and their related general
ledger entries
calculates all employee wages and benefits for an unlimited number
of salaried and hourly employees
allocates employee time to user-defined cost centers
uses touch screen time clocks to eliminate manual time entry
reduces effort of gathering employee time data and increases access
of managers to such data
• makes time records more accurate by identifying employees through
bar-coding and optional biometric fingerprint technology
•
•
•
•
•
•
provides for computerized bank deposits to meet payroll and accounts
payable needs
provides for computerized employee files through document/image
scanning and data entry
allows for complete tracking of benefits and other employee data
through a variety of user-defined reports
tracks job applicant information to assist in the employee recruiting
and hiring process
allows for complete on-line budget preparation through computerized
access to historical data
allows access to information regarding hospital assets including
locations and depreciation scheduling
7
Materials Management
•
•
tracks the flow of materials throughout the hospital
automates the process of inventory control, materials purchasing,
stock requisitions and patient charging
Clinical. Our clinical software automates record keeping and reporting for many clinical functions including
laboratory, radiology, physical therapy, respiratory care, and pharmacy. These products eliminate tedious
paperwork, calculations and written documentation while allowing for easy retrieval of patient data and statistics.
Our clinical software:
Laboratory Information
Systems
Laboratory Instrument
Interfaces
Radiology Information
Systems
ImageLink®
Physical Therapy and
Respiratory Care
Pharmacy
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
provides an interface to laboratory analytical instruments in order to
transfer results to nurse stations, mobile point-of-care systems and
remote physician offices
allows users to receive orders from any designated location, process
orders and report results and maintain technical, statistical and
account information
provides an automated solution for reviewing test results and
completing patient orders
reduces the amount of required manual data entry thereby reducing
the likelihood of human error
reduces time to process laboratory specimens
includes flash card printing, patient scheduling, transcription, patient
indexing by X-Ray film number, film tracking and location
receives patient data, patient locations and other interdepartmental
communications support
provides a complete picture archiving and communications system
(PACS) with comprehensive functionality designed to fit seamlessly
with our other applications
allows the realization of an electronic medical record complete with
diagnostic images
provides physicians real time access to diagnostic images via the
internet through ChartLink®
communicates to nursing the appropriate procedures and patient
preparation instructions from orders entered into the CPSI system
keeps a journal of the orders received and processed
handles a variety of processing tasks after a patient order is reviewed
allows a department to customize its results to be sent back to nursing
allows the hospital pharmacist to enter and fill physician orders
performs all of the functions related to patient charging, general
ledger upgrading, re-supply scheduling and inventory reduction/
statistics maintenance
improves patient care by monitoring drug/drug and food/drug
interactions, allergy contraindications, dosage ranges and duplicate
therapy
produces drug education information for each patient in an easy-to-
read format
8
Patient Care. Our patient care applications allow hospitals to create computerized “patient files” in place of
the traditional paper file systems. This software enables physicians, nurses and other hospital staff to improve the
quality of patient care through increased access to patient information, assistance with projected care
requirements and feedback regarding patient needs. Our software also addresses current safety initiatives in the
healthcare industry such as the transition from written prescriptions and physician orders to computerized
physician order entry. Our patient care software:
Order Entry /Results
Reporting
Point-of-Care System
Patient Acuity
ChartLink®
Medication Verification
Resident Assessment
Instruments
Medical Practice EMR
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
provides efficient order and result communication
automates the entry of patient charges
reduces “lost” charges and mistakes due to legibility
increases efficiency of nursing stations
provides interactive, real time status reports for orders
allows nurses to enter patient data into the network at the patient’s
bedside thereby eliminating the duplicate entry of information
utilizes touch-screen and wireless technology
• makes patient information instantly available throughout the entire
hospital system
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
categorizes patients according to an assessment of the acuity of the
illness, severity of the symptoms, and projected nursing dependency
allows nurses to project the total character and amount of care that
should be provided to each patient
provides physicians with a secure and interactive portal to patient
information through a hospital’s website
optional computerized physician order entry, including the ability to
enter medication, ancillary test and treatment orders
verifies the accuracy of patient medication orders at a patient’s
bedside by comparing scans of patient and medication bar codes
against the medication orders and history for that patient
screens medication orders for possible patient allergies and/or drug
interactions
allows nursing staff to complete time consuming resident reporting
requirements in an expeditious and efficient manner
generates nursing care plans based on deficiencies in the resident
reports
provides medical practices and clinics with a complete CCHITSM
certified electronic medical record
supports patient account management and insurance processing for
single and multiple practices/clinics
automates medical practice workflow with an interactive white board,
template driven documentation, image capture/document scanning,
and an integrated Superbill
integrated with CPSI’s ChartLink® EMR portal, the module provides
immediate and secure access to the patient’s complete ambulatory
and inpatient history
9
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
supports both hospital-based and remote practices/clinics
supports patient account management and insurance processing for
home health agencies
provides complete, regulatory compliant home care tracking
provides for remote in home documentation of care
provides the hospital’s outreach clients, such as physicians, their
office administrators, nursing homes, home health agencies, and local
businesses, with remote access to online, real time, secure patient
data as needed and appropriate for each outreach client
available information includes insurance and billing information,
diagnosis and procedure coding, discharge summaries, pharmacy
profiles and other clinical and administrative information
electronic form templates replace paper based records and care forms
completed forms become a permanent part of the patient’s electronic
medical record
Outreach Client
Access
Electronic Forms
Enterprise Applications. We provide software applications that support the products described above and are
useful to all areas of the hospital. These applications include: ad hoc reporting, automatic batch and real-time
system backups, an integrated fax system, archival data repository, document scanning and Microsoft Office
integration and an Application Portal. The Application Portal allows clients to access our applications remotely
via Microsoft Internet Explorer and the Internet without requiring the loading of any additional client software on
the accessing PC. User information and data accessed is secured with HIPAA compliant 128 bit cipher strength
Secure Socket Layer (SSL) encryption. Remote access using the Application Portal results in no discernable
difference to the user in software functionality.
Support and Maintenance Services
After a customer installs a CPSI system, we provide software application support, hardware maintenance,
continuing education and related services pursuant to a support agreement. The following describes services
provided to customers using CPSI systems.
Total System Support. We believe the quality of continuing customer support is one of the most critical
considerations in the selection of an information system provider. We provide hardware, technical and software
support for all aspects of our system which gives us the flexibility to take the necessary course of action to
resolve any issue. Unlike our competitors who use third-party services for hardware and software support, we
provide a single, convenient and efficient resource for all of our customers’ system support needs. In order to
minimize the impact of a system problem, we train our customer service personnel to be technically proficient,
courteous and prompt. Because a properly functioning information system is crucial to a hospital’s operations,
our support teams are available 24 hours a day to assist customers with any problem that may arise. Customers
can also use the Internet to directly access our support system. This allows customers to communicate
electronically with our support teams at any time. With over 500 employees who provide customer service and
support, we currently have close to a one-to-one support staff to customer ratio.
User Group. All of our customers have the opportunity to be members of our user group from which we
solicit feedback regarding our products. We host a national user group meeting annually. We have also organized
several active regional user groups which meet on a semi-annual basis. These groups meet to discuss and
recommend product modifications and improvements which they then evaluate and prioritize. Upon confirming
that the desired improvements are technically feasible, we agree to allocate a significant amount of programming
time each year to undertake the requested modification or improvement. The majority of our product
enhancements originate from suggestions from our customers through the user group structure.
10
Software Releases. We are committed to providing our customers with software and technology solutions
that will continue to meet their information system needs. To accomplish this purpose, we continually work to
enhance and improve our application programs. As part of this effort, for each customer covered under our
general support agreement, we provide software updates as they become available at no additional cost. We
design these enhancements to be seamlessly integrated into each customer’s existing CPSI system. The benefit of
these enhancements is that each customer, regardless of its original installation date, uses the most advanced
CPSI software available. Through this process, we can keep our customers up-to-date with the latest operational
innovations in the healthcare industry as well as changing governmental regulatory requirements. Another benefit
of this “one system” concept is that our customer service teams can be more effective in responding to customer
needs because they maintain a complete understanding of and familiarity with the one system that all customers
use.
Purchasing a new information technology system requires the expenditure of a substantial amount of capital
and other resources, and many customers are concerned that these systems will become obsolete as technology
changes. Our periodic product updates eliminate our customers’ concerns about system obsolescence. We believe
providing this benefit is a strong incentive for potential customers to select our products over the products of our
competitors.
Hardware Replacement. As part of our general support agreements, we are also committed to promptly
replacing malfunctioning system hardware in order to minimize the effect of operational interruptions. By
providing all hardware used in our system, we believe we are better able to meet and address all of the
information technology needs of our customers.
Software as a Service. In some circumstances, we offer SaaS services to customers via remote access
telecommunications. As an application service provider, we store and maintain computer servers dedicated to
specific customers which contain all of such customers’ critical patient and administrative data. These customers
access this information remotely through direct telecommunications connections with these servers.
Internet Service Provider. As part of our total information solution, we can provide Internet connection
services to our customers. We also can provide web-site design and hosting services.
Forms and Supplies. We offer our customers the forms that they need for their patient and financial records,
as well as their general office supplies. Furnishing these forms and supplies helps us to achieve our objective of
being a one-source solution for a hospital’s complete healthcare information system requirements.
Managed Network Services. We offer comprehensive support for LAN, WLAN, WAN and VPN
infrastructures for those customers needing assistance with their data networks. Security updates, hardware
support, network monitoring, wireless access management, VPN and private point-to-point connectivity
management and monitoring solutions can be subscribed to based on the unique client needs.
Server and Storage Management. We offer complete management of CPSI installed server and storage
technology, including monitoring, administration, and change management solutions to enhance client
availability strategies for those important assets.
Desktop Support. We offer timely support for desktop hardware, operating systems, select application
software and peripheral devices. Desktop support offerings can help expedite problem resolution and ensure
employees are not hindered by technology obstacles.
Communications Solutions. We offer a robust set of fault tolerant communications hosting solutions for
websites; electronic mail, Blackberry Exchange Server, and DNS services.
11
Connectivity Solutions. We provide a variety of solutions to help ensure clients can stay connected to the
Internet in remote locations, including MPLS, Metro-E, DSL, DS-1, DS-3 and other options.
Security Services. We offer complete solutions for protecting the integrity of information systems and
keeping system security compliant with Federal law, including HIPAA privacy and security requirements.
Solutions for malware (anti-virus protection), Internet content filtering, and firewall administration can all be
provided through CPSI’s offerings.
Data Center Services. We offer a SAS70 Type II accredited data center to house and manage client servers
and storage technologies. Solutions for managing these environments and the provision of other data center
services, such as disaster recovery co-location and remote testing services, are available.
Business Management Services
Electronic Billing. We provide electronic billing for customers at prices competitive with other electronic
billing vendors. Once a customer processes patient insurance claims in our system, we then perform the
electronic billing function with no other participation by hospital staff. With this service, customers need not
prepare billing files or maintain interfaces with third-party software, thereby saving the customer both time and
money.
Statement Processing. Our customers may choose to have us prepare and distribute all patient billing
statements. We use our knowledge of a customer’s collection system to produce statements without requiring any
actions on the part of the hospital data processing personnel. Because we can connect directly with a customer’s
system, the customer is not required to build and transfer files to us. All system enhancements are incorporated
into the statement process without having to modify any third-party vendor interface. Like the electronic billing,
this service saves the customer both time and money.
Accounts Receivable Management. We offer customers the option of using us to perform their patient
billing functions and accounts receivable management. Using this service allows customers to reduce costs by
employing fewer full time administrative employees.
Payroll Processing. We offer customers the option of using us to perform their payroll functions, including
payroll processing, tax and deduction management, and quarterly and yearly reporting.
Contract Management. We offer customers the option of using us to perform audits of payments from third
party insurers with which a customer executes managed care contracts to ensure payments are made in
accordance to the agreed upon metrics.
Insurance Services. We offer customers the option of using us to provide insurance services to include
Insurance Follow-up, Claim Eligibility Checking, Claim Status Checking, Pharmacy Online Adjudication, and
Medical Necessity Database Updates. Using these services allows customers to improve their revenue cycle
management by reducing the incidents of invalid claims and monitoring the progress of valid claims.
System Implementation and Training
Conversion Services. When a customer purchases our system, we convert its existing data to the CPSI
system. Our knowledge of hospital data processing, in conjunction with extensive in-house technical expertise,
allows us to accomplish this task in a cost effective manner. When we install a new system, the data conversion
has already occurred so that the system is immediately operational. Our goal is for each customer to be
immediately productive in order not to waste time and money on the costly and inefficient task of maintaining
the same data on parallel systems. Our services also relieve the hospital staff of the time-consuming burden of
data conversion.
12
Training. In order to integrate the new system and to ensure its success, we spend approximately three
weeks providing individualized training on-site at each customer’s facility at the time of installation. We directly
train all hospital users, including staff members and healthcare providers, during all hospital shifts in the use of
hardware and software applications. In contrast, some of our competitors train only a hospital’s training staff at
an off-site location. We employ nurses and medical technicians in addition to our technical training staff in order
to help us communicate more effectively with our customers during the training process.
Technology
Operating Systems and Server Platform. We utilize Intel-based servers running industry standard “open
systems,” including Unix, Linux and Microsoft Windows 2000 Server operating systems.
ClientWare® Networking. Our ClientWare® application integrates the UNIX and Linux systems with
Microsoft operating systems. This integration brings together the strengths of both operating environments. The
processing power of UNIX and Linux combined with the communication capabilities of Microsoft Windows
creates an information system that allows the use of familiar “point and click” processing. This architecture also
facilitates integration of other Microsoft software and provides expanded opportunities for the inclusion of new
technologies without sacrificing system reliability or performance.
Wireless Technology. Traditional workstations were designed around access to electrical and network
outlets. We now use wireless networking technology to connect computers to the CPSI system. This allows
customers to use mobile computers and to place stationary computers in locations for optimum convenience and
ease of use. We incorporate wireless laptop and hand held computers into our system. Convenient to carry and
use, these mobile computers allow effective data collection and real-time access to patient information from
practically anywhere in the hospital. Information efficiently collected will then be more quickly accessible by
other caregivers throughout the hospital.
Point-of-Care Stations. We use “point-of-care stations” which allow nurses to enter information into the
system at a patient’s bedside. These stations consist of compact computers on individual data entry stations that
are lightweight, durable and easy to maneuver. We incorporate our wireless networking capabilities into these
stations in order to provide extended range and mobility.
Touch Sensitive Displays. Data entry is made easier through the use of touch sensitive displays. With this
technology, work areas are free of the traditional keyboard and mouse associated with most personal computers.
Touch screens are also more efficient for users who are not proficient in computer skills.
Biometric Recognition. As unique as each individual, a fingerprint cannot be duplicated, making it one of
the most secure methods of verifying a person’s identity. Because of the sensitivity of healthcare information and
proposed federal security requirements, we have incorporated licensed fingerprint identification technology as an
option for our systems. When a user signs on to the system, he or she must scan his or her fingerprint as well as
enter a traditional password. The system rapidly responds with the confirmation or rejection of the user’s
identity.
Product Development and Enhancement
We are continually working to improve and enhance the CPSI system and to develop new products and
services for our system. The primary source of ideas for improvements to our products and services comes from
our customers through our national user group. We believe our interaction with customers and their
communication with each other is the most efficient way to learn about and respond to changes in the healthcare
operating environment. This approach to research and development allows us to quickly adapt to technology
advances and improve our products and services to better serve the needs of our customers. Our management and
customer support and service teams play a significant role in product development by continually monitoring the
13
needs and desires of our customers and our market. In addition to our customer support and service teams, during
2008, the Product Development Services division was created. This division is responsible for the development,
quality assurance/testing, documentation, and distribution of all application software. By consolidating all our
development efforts under a single division, we can ensure standardization in our software development
processes and effective utilization of our resources. We currently have 156 employees in our Product
Development Services division, including 7 research and development employees whose dedicated function is to
develop new uses for and applications of technology available in the marketplace.
Customers, Sales and Marketing
Target Market. The target market for our information system consists of small and midsize hospitals of 300
or fewer acute care beds. In the United States, there are approximately 5,010 hospitals in this size range. In
addition, we market our products to small specialty hospitals in the United States that focus on discrete medical
areas such as surgery, rehabilitation and psychiatry. As of February 28, 2011, we had installed our system in over
650 facilities in 46 states and the District of Columbia. Approximately 94% of our existing customers are
hospitals with 100 or fewer acute care beds, while approximately 99% of our existing customers are hospitals
with 200 or fewer acute care beds. Our goal is to increase sales to hospitals with 100 to 300 acute care beds while
maintaining our competitive position in the under 100 bed market segment.
Sales Staff. Most of our new customers are referrals from our existing customers, thereby reducing the need
for a large sales force. Currently, we have 35 employees dedicated to direct sales, 18 of whom concentrate on
new prospects, and 17 of whom are responsible for the sale of additional products and services to existing
customers. We hire our sales representatives from our existing employees. Our current sales representatives have
an average of over 16 years of experience with the company including experience in installation, training and
customer support. Our sales representatives have defined geographic territories in the United States in which to
target new customers. A significant portion of the compensation for all sales personnel is commission based.
Marketing Strategy. Our primary marketing strategy is to generate referrals from our existing customers and
directly solicit potential users through presentations at industry seminars and trade shows. We also advertise in
various healthcare industry trade publications. For hospitals that we have targeted as potential customers, most of
our direct sales efforts involve site visits and meetings with hospital management. The typical sales cycle of a
healthcare information system usually takes six to eighteen months from the time of initial contact to the signing
of a contract. Therefore, we believe it is important for our sales staff to dedicate a substantial amount of time and
energy to building relationships with potential new customers. We do not conduct extensive marketing activities
and promotions because hospitals are easily identified, finite in number and generally send a request for proposal
to vendors when they contemplate the purchase of a hospital information system.
Competition
The market for our products and services is competitive, and we expect additional competition from
established and emerging companies in the future. Our market is characterized by rapidly changing technology,
evolving user needs and the frequent introduction of new products. We believe the principal competitive factors
that hospitals consider when choosing between us and our competitors are:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
product features, functionality and performance;
level of customer service and satisfaction;
ease of integration and speed of implementation;
product price;
knowledge of the healthcare industry;
sales and marketing efforts; and
company reputation.
14
Our principal competitors are Medical Information Technology, Inc., or “Meditech,” Healthland, and
Healthcare Management Systems, Inc., or “HMS.” Meditech, Healthland and HMS compete with us directly in
our target market of small and midsize hospitals. These companies offer products and systems that are
comparable to our system and address the needs of hospitals in the markets we serve.
Our secondary competitors include McKesson Corporation, Quadramed Corp., Cerner Corporation and
Siemens Corporation. These companies are significantly larger than we are, and they typically sell their products
and services to larger hospitals outside of our target market. However, they will sometimes compete directly with
us.
We also face competition from providers of practice management systems, general decision support and
database systems and other segment-specific applications, as well as from healthcare technology consultants.
Any of these companies as well as other technology or healthcare companies could decide at any time to
specifically target hospitals within our target market.
A number of existing and potential competitors are more established than we are and have greater name
recognition and financial, technical and marketing resources than we have. Products of our competitors may have
better performance, lower prices and broader market acceptance than our products. We expect that competition
will continue to increase.
Health Information Security and Privacy Practices
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”) is a federal law that affects the
use, disclosure, transmission and storage of individually identifiable health information, referred to as “protected
health information,” and that was enacted for the purpose of, among other things, protecting the privacy and
security of protected health information. As directed by HIPAA, the Department of Health and Human Services
(“DHHS”) has promulgated standards and rules for certain electronic health transactions, code sets, data security,
unique identification numbers and privacy of protected health information. DHHS has issued some of these rules
in final form, while others remain in development. HIPPA and the standards promulgated by DHHS apply to
certain health plans, healthcare clearinghouses, and healthcare providers (referred to as “covered entities”), which
includes our hospital customers. The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act
(“HITECH Act”), which was enacted as part of the ARRA in 2009, significantly expanded HIPAA by extending
the security standards of HIPAA to “business associates” of healthcare providers that are covered entities. Under
the HITECH Act, business associates are required to establish administrative, physical and technical safeguards
and are subject to direct penalties for violations. Our business management services activities frequently entail us
acting in the capacity of a business associate to the hospitals that we serve, and therefore we are covered by the
patient privacy and security standards of HIPAA and subject to oversight by DHHS. We believe that we have
taken all necessary steps to comply with HIPAA, as it applies to us as a business associate, but it is important to
note that DHHS could, at any time in the future, adopt new rules or modify existing rules in a manner that could
require us to change our systems or operations.
Internal Management Control System
We have developed and maintain an automated enterprise management system which permits us to manage
not only all of our internal management, accounting and personnel functions, but also all information relating to
each customer’s information system. Our system maintains detailed records of all information regarding each
customer’s system, including all system specifications, service history and customer communications, among
other things. This internal control system helps us to more effectively respond to customer support needs through
complete and current system information and through situation-based problem solving.
15
Intellectual Property
We regard some aspects of our internal operations, software and documentation as proprietary, and rely
primarily on a combination of contract and trade secret laws to protect our proprietary information. We believe,
because of the rapid pace of technological change in the computer software industry, trade secret and copyright
protection is less significant than factors such as the knowledge, ability and experience of our employees,
frequent software product enhancements and the timeliness and quality of support services. We cannot guarantee
that these protections will be adequate or that our competitors will not independently develop technologies that
are substantially equivalent or superior to our technology.
We do not believe our software products or other CPSI proprietary rights infringe on the property rights of
third parties. However, we cannot guarantee that third parties will not assert infringement claims against us with
respect to current or future software products or that any such assertion may not require us to enter into royalty
arrangements or result in costly litigation.
Employees
As of February 28, 2011, we had 1,194 employees, all but 16 of whom are located at our offices in Mobile
and Lanett, Alabama and Monroe, Louisiana. Our employees can be grouped according to the following general
categories: 532 in software services and support, 299 in business management services, 121 in information
technology services and support, 156 in product development services, 47 in sales and marketing and 39 in
administration. Our general practice is to recruit recent college graduates for entry-level positions and then
promote these individuals within the organization to fill vacancies in higher positions. We also hire nurses and
other medically-trained professionals in connection with our support services.
Since 1991, we have maintained a non-qualified profit sharing plan under which all full-time employees
with three years of uninterrupted service are eligible to participate, other than executive officers and
commissioned salespeople. The plan is designed to provide each eligible employee with periodic cash bonuses
based on our profitability. Each eligible employee receives a pro rata share of the amount of cash distributed
under the profit sharing plan based on the amount of their base salary compared to the sum of the salaries of all
participating employees. Our profit sharing plan is not a qualified plan for tax purposes or a guaranteed benefit.
Contributions to the plan are made periodically at the discretion of the Board of Directors. During 2010, we
distributed approximately $2.3 million under this profit sharing plan. We plan to continue to make distributions
under the profit sharing plan based on our profitability.
We are fortunate to have a high rate of employee retention, with our senior management having an average
tenure in excess of 18 years. Our performance depends in significant part on our ability to attract, train and retain
highly qualified personnel. None of our employees are represented by a labor union, and we believe our relations
with our employees are good.
Executive Officers
The executive officers of CPSI serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors. Set forth below is a list of the
current executive officers of CPSI and a brief explanation of their principal employment during the last five
(5) years.
J. Boyd Douglas – President and Chief Executive Officer. J. Boyd Douglas, age 44, has served as our
President and Chief Executive Officer since May 2006. He was elected as a director in March 2002. Mr. Douglas
began his career with us in August 1988 as a Financial Software Support Representative. From May 1990 until
November 1994, Mr. Douglas served as Manager of Electronic Billing, and from December 1994 until June
1999, he held the position of Director of Programming Services. From July 1999 until May 2006, Mr. Douglas
served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer.
16
David A. Dye – Vice President—Finance, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer. David A.
Dye, age 41, has served as our Vice President—Finance, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer since
July 1, 2010. Mr. Dye served as our President and Chief Executive Officer from July 1999 to May of 2006. He
was elected as a director in March 2002 and has served as our Chairman of the Board since May of 2006.
Mr. Dye began his career with CPSI in May 1990 as a Financial Software Support Representative and served in
various positions until July 1999, when he became our President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Dye has
served as a director of Bulow Biotech Prosthetics, LLC, a company headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee that
operates prosthetic clinics in the Southeastern United States, since November 1998 and has been a member of
such company since July 2006.
Victor S. Schneider – Senior Vice President—Corporate and Business Development. Victor S.
Schneider, age 52, has served as our Senior Vice President—Corporate and Business Development since
December 2005. Mr. Schneider is responsible for revenue generation efforts, customer relations, strategic growth
initiatives and positioning, and market execution. Mr. Schneider began his career with us in June 1983 as Sales
Manager. He served in that capacity until January 1997 when he was promoted to Sales Director. He served as
our Vice President—Sales and Marketing from July 1999 until December 2005.
Robert D. Hinckle – Vice President—Software Services. Robert D. Hinckle, age 41, has served as our
Vice President—Software Services since October 2004. Mr. Hinckle is responsible for overseeing all aspects of
the installation and support of our software products. Since beginning his career with us in 1995 as a Financial
Software Support Representative, Mr. Hinckle has worked in various positions in our Software Services
Division, including Team Manager, Assistant Director and Director of that division.
Patrick A. Immel – Vice President—Information Technology Services. Patrick A. Immel, age 40, has
served as our Vice President—Information Technology Services since January 2000. Mr. Immel is responsible
for overseeing technical hardware and support and hardware research and development. Mr. Immel began his
career with us in July 1993 as a Financial Software Support Representative. Since that time, Mr. Immel has
served as a programmer, Manager of Technical Support and most recently as Director of Information Technology
Services.
Troy D. Rosser – Vice President—Sales. Troy D. Rosser, age 46, has served as our Vice President —
Sales since October 2005. Mr. Rosser is responsible for overseeing all of our sales and marketing efforts.
Mr. Rosser began his career with us in March 1989 as a Financial Software Support Representative. In 1992,
Mr. Rosser was transferred to the Sales and Marketing division where he has worked in various positions,
including Sales Manager and, from October 2000 until October 2005, as Director of Sales.
Michael K. Muscat, Jr. – Senior Vice President—Product Development Services. Michael K. Muscat,
Jr., age 37, has served as our Senior Vice President – Product Development Services since March 2008.
Mr. Muscat is responsible for overseeing all aspects of the development quality assurance/testing,
documentation, and distribution of all application software. Mr. Muscat began his career with us in July 1996 as
a Software Support Representative. Mr. Muscat then served as a Programmer and Manager of Outsourcing
Services. From June 2002 to May 2006, Mr. Muscat served as the Director of Business Management Services
and from May 2006 until March 2008 as the Vice President of Business Management Services.
Robert D. Smith – Vice President—Product Development Services. Robert D. Smith, age 40, has served
as our Vice President – Product Development Services since March 2008. Mr. Smith is responsible for
overseeing all aspects of system programming and enhancements within our Product Development division.
Since Mr. Smith began his career with us in September 1993, he has served in the capacity of Technical Support
Representative, Programmer, and Programming Manager. From January 2001 to May 2006, Mr. Smith served as
the Director of Programming Services and from May 2006 to March of 2008 as Vice President of Programming
Services.
17
Christopher L. Fowler – Vice President—Business Management Services. Christopher L. Fowler, age
35, has served as our Vice President – Business Management Services since March 2008. Mr. Fowler is
responsible for overseeing all aspects of the business management services we provide to our clients. Mr. Fowler
began his career with us in May 2000 as a Software Support Representative and later as a manager of Financial
Software Services. From August 2004 until March 2008, Mr. Fowler served as Assistant Director and Director of
Business Management Services.
Company Website
The Company maintains a website at http://www.cpsinet.com. The Company makes available on its website,
free of charge, its Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K,
and all amendments to those reports, as soon as it is reasonably practicable after such material is electronically
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company is not including the information contained on
or available through its website as a part of, or incorporating such information into, this Annual Report on Form
10-K.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
The Health Care Legislation and implementing regulations could have a material adverse impact on the
business of our hospital customers and ultimately on our results of operations and financial condition.
In March 2010 the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education
Reconciliation Act of 2010 were signed into law. These two laws, which we refer to collectively as the
Healthcare Legislation, represent sweeping changes to the U.S. healthcare system. Among other things, the
Healthcare Legislation requires substantially all individuals to have health insurance, expands Medicaid
eligibility, mandates material changes to the delivery of healthcare services and reduces the reimbursement paid
for such services in order to generate savings in the Medicare program, and modifies certain payment systems to
encourage more cost-effective care and a reduction of inefficiencies and waste, including through new tools to
address fraud and abuse. While we currently anticipate that the Healthcare Legislation will have little direct
impact on our internal operations, it may have a significant impact on the business of our hospital customers,
which in turn could affect our business.
Many of the provisions of the Healthcare Legislation do not take effect for an extended period of time,
during which time the legislation will likely be subject to further adjustments through future legislation and
constitutional challenges. Additionally, we anticipate that many of the provisions in the Reform Legislation will
be subject to further clarification and modification through the rule-making process, the development of agency
guidance and judicial interpretations. Accordingly, we have not been able to determine at this point whether the
impact of the legislation on our hospital customers will be positive, negative or neutral. However, it is likely that
the Healthcare Legislation will affect hospitals differently depending upon the populations they serve and payor
mix. Our target market of community hospitals typically serve higher uninsured populations than larger urban
hospitals and rely more heavily on Medicare and Medicaid for reimbursement. It remains to be seen whether the
increase in the insured population for community hospitals will be sufficient to offset proposed cuts in Medicare
and Medicaid reimbursements contained in the Healthcare Legislation.
The Healthcare Legislation will ultimately lead to significant changes in the health care system. While it is
too early to fully understand and assess the impact of the Healthcare Legislation on our hospital customers, it is
possible that the Reform Legislation could have a material adverse effect on the business of our customers, which
in turn could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial condition.
18
While provisions in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 are expected to increase the
demand for healthcare information technology, including the solutions offered by the Company, such laws
and regulations may require additional expenditures and have adverse consequences on the Company.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the “ARRA”), includes more than $19 billion in
funding to aid healthcare organizations in modernizing their operations through the acquisition and wide-spread
use of healthcare information technology. Included in the funding is approximately $17.2 billion in incentives
through Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement systems to encourage and assist healthcare providers in adopting
and using electronic health records (“EHRs”). These incentive payments began in February 2011 and last through
September 2015. If an eligible healthcare provider does not begin to demonstrate meaningful use of EHRs by
2015, then reimbursement under Medicare will begin to be reduced.
Notwithstanding that the ARRA places substantial emphasis on the modernization of the U.S. healthcare
system by incentivizing the use of healthcare information technology, with a primary focus on EHRs, our ability
to benefit from such initiatives could change. Final regulations issued in July 2010 under the Health Information
Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, or HITECH Act, which was enacted as part of the ARRA in
2009, established the technical capabilities required for certified EHRs, as well as “meaningful use” requirements
that healthcare providers must satisfy to qualify for bonus payments under the Medicare program. We have
devoted significant resources to help ensure that our technology meets the ARRA’s EHR certification
requirements, and our EHR system was certified under ARRA in December 2010. However, in the event that
changes to the EHR technical requirements are made, we may be required to incur additional research and
development expenditures to modify or expand our software systems in order to maintain certification under the
ARRA. The failure of our EHR system to maintain its certification under ARRA, as a result of changes to the
technical requirements under the ARRA or otherwise, could adversely affect our competitive position and have a
material adverse effect on our business.
Economic, market and other factors may cause a decline in spending for information technology and services
by our current and prospective customers which may result in less demand for our products, lower prices and,
consequently, lower revenues and a lower revenue growth rate.
The purchase of our information system involves a significant financial commitment by our customers. At
the same time, the healthcare industry faces significant financial pressures that could adversely affect overall
spending on healthcare information technology and services. For example, the recent economic recession and
continued decrease in availability of credit, combined with potential reductions in federal and state funding for
Medicare and Medicaid, has caused hospitals to reduce, eliminate or postpone information technology related
and other spending. To the extent spending for healthcare information technology and services declines or
increases slower than we anticipate, demand for our products and services, as well as the prices we charge, could
be adversely affected. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that we will be able to increase or maintain our
revenues or our growth rate.
There are a limited number of hospitals in our target market. Consolidation in the healthcare industry could
result in the loss of existing customers, a reduction in our potential customer base and downward pressure on
our products’ prices.
There are a finite number of small and midsize hospitals with 300 or fewer acute care beds. Saturation of
this market with our products or our competitors’ products could eventually limit our revenues and growth.
Furthermore, many healthcare providers have consolidated to create larger healthcare delivery enterprises with
greater market power. If this consolidation continues, we could lose existing customers and could experience a
decrease in the number of potential purchasers of our products and services. The loss of existing and potential
customers due to industry consolidation could cause our revenue growth rate to decline. In addition, larger,
consolidated enterprises could have greater bargaining power, which may lead to downward pressure on the
prices for our products and services.
19
We may experience fluctuations in quarterly financial performance that cause us to fail to meet revenues or
earnings expectations. Failure to meet these expectations could adversely impact our stock price.
There is no assurance that consistent quarterly growth in our business will occur. Our quarterly revenues
may fluctuate and may be difficult to forecast for a variety of reasons. For example, prospective customers often
take significant time evaluating our system and related services before making a purchase decision. Moreover, a
prospective customer who has placed an order for our system could decide to cancel that order or postpone
installation of the ordered system. If a prospective customer delays or cancels a scheduled system installation
during any quarter, we may not be able to schedule a substitute system installation during that quarter. The
amount of revenues that would have been generated from that installation will be postponed or lost. The
possibility of delays or cancellations of scheduled system installations could cause our quarterly revenues to
fluctuate.
The following factors may also affect demand for our products and services and cause our quarterly
revenues to fluctuate:
•
changes in customer budgets and purchasing priorities;
• market acceptance of new products, product enhancements and services from us and our competitors;
•
•
product and price competition; and
delay of revenue recognition to future quarters due to an increase in the sale of our remote access SaaS
services.
Variations in our quarterly revenues may adversely affect our operating results. In each fiscal quarter, our
expense levels, operating costs and hiring plans are based on projections of future revenues and are relatively
fixed. If our actual revenues fall below expectations, our earnings will also likely fail to meet expectations. If we
fail to meet the revenue or earnings expectations of securities analysts and investors, then the price of our
common stock will likely decrease.
Continued volatility and disruption to the global capital and credit markets may adversely affect our ability to
access credit in the future, the cost of any credit obtained in the future, and the financial soundness of our
customers and our business.
While the Company does not currently have any debt, ongoing volatility and disruption in the global capital
and credit markets, including the bankruptcy or restructuring of certain financial institutions, reduced lending
activity by other financial institutions and decreased liquidity, may adversely affect the availability, terms and
cost of credit should we seek it in the future. Although we believe that our operating cash flow and financial
assets will give us the ability to meet our financing needs for the foreseeable future, there can be no assurance
that the continued or increased volatility and disruption in the global capital and credit markets will not impair
our liquidity or increase the costs of any future borrowing.
Our business could also be negatively impacted to the extent that our hospital customers experience
disruptions resulting from tighter capital and credit markets, the recent economic recession or cuts in Medicare
and Medicaid funding. As a result, hospitals may modify, delay or cancel plans to purchase our software systems
or services. Additionally, if hospitals’ operating and financial performance deteriorates, or if they are unable to
make scheduled payments or obtain credit, they may not be able to pay, or may delay payment of, accounts
receivable owed to us. Any inability of customers to pay us for our products and services may adversely affect
our earnings and cash flow.
The absence of third-party credit has resulted in many of our hospital customers seeking financing
arrangements from us to purchase our software systems and services. These financing arrangements impact our
short-term operating cash flow and cash available. Should the request for these financing arrangements continue
20
or increase, our business could be negatively impacted by our inability to finance these arrangements. In
addition, the absence of credit could negatively impact our existing financing receivables should our customers
with financing arrangements be unable to meet their obligations.
Competition with companies that have greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we have
could result in loss of customers and/or a lowering of prices for our products, causing a decrease in our
revenues and/or market share.
Our principal competitors are Meditech, Healthland and HMS. Meditech, Healthland and HMS compete
with us directly in our target market of small and midsize hospitals. These companies offer products and services
that are comparable to our system and are designed to address the needs of community hospitals.
Our secondary competitors include McKesson Corporation, Quadramed Corp., Cerner Corporation, and
Siemens Corporation. These companies are significantly larger than we are, and they typically sell their products
and services to larger hospitals outside of our target market. However, they sometimes compete directly with us.
We also face competition from providers of practice management systems, general decision support and database
systems and other segment-specific applications, as well as from healthcare technology consultants. Any of these
companies as well as other technology or healthcare companies could decide at any time to specifically target
hospitals within our target market.
A number of existing and potential competitors are more established than we are and have greater name
recognition and financial, technical and marketing resources. Products of our competitors may have better
performance, lower prices and broader market acceptance than our products. We expect increased competition
that could cause us to lose customers, lower our prices to remain competitive and experience lower revenues,
revenue growth and profit margins. Additionally, the substantial amount of money contemplated by the ARRA to
be spent on healthcare information technology may further increase competition by attracting new and financially
stronger companies to this industry.
Our failure to develop new products or enhance current products in response to market demands could
adversely impact our competitive position and require substantial capital resources to correct.
The needs of hospitals in our target market are subject to rapid change due to government regulation, trends
in clinical care practices and technological advancements. As a result of these changes, our products may quickly
become obsolete or less competitive. New product introductions and enhancements by our competitors that more
effectively or timely respond to changing industry needs may weaken our competitive position.
We continually redesign and enhance our products to incorporate new technologies and adapt our products
to ever-changing hardware and software platforms. Often we face difficult choices regarding which new
technologies to adopt. If we fail to anticipate or respond adequately to technological advancements, or experience
significant delays in product development or introduction, our competitive position could be negatively affected.
Moreover, our failure to offer products acceptable to our target market could require us to make significant
capital investments and incur higher operating costs to redesign our products, which could negatively affect our
financial condition and operating results.
Potential regulation of our products as medical devices by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration could
increase our costs, delay the introduction of new products and slow our revenue growth.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or the “FDA,” could become more active in regulating the use of
computer software for clinical purposes. The FDA has increasingly regulated computer products and computer-
assisted products as medical devices under the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, an example of which is our
21
ImageLink® product. If the FDA regulates any more of our products as medical devices, we would likely be
required to, among other things:
•
•
•
seek FDA clearance by demonstrating that our product is substantially equivalent to a device already
legally marketed, or obtain FDA approval by establishing the safety and effectiveness of our product;
comply with rigorous regulations governing pre-clinical and clinical testing, manufacture, distribution,
labeling and promotion of medical devices; and
comply with the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act’s general controls, including establishment registration,
device listing, compliance with good manufacturing practices and reporting of specified device
malfunctions and other adverse device events.
There is a possibility that some of our products currently in development or to be developed in the future
could be subjected to FDA regulation similar to our ImageLink® product. If any of our products fail to comply
with FDA requirements, we could face FDA refusal to grant pre-market clearance or approval of products;
withdrawal of existing clearances and approvals; fines, injunctions or civil penalties; recalls or product
corrections; production suspensions; and criminal prosecution. FDA regulation of our products could increase
our operating costs, delay or prevent the marketing of new or existing products and adversely affect our revenue
growth.
Governmental regulations relating to patient confidentiality and other matters could increase our costs.
State and federal laws regulate the confidentiality of patient records and the circumstances under which
those records may be released. These regulations may require the users of such information to implement
security measures. Regulations governing electronic health data transmissions are also evolving rapidly, and they
are often unclear and difficult to apply.
In our support agreements with our customers, we agree to update our software applications to comply with
applicable federal and state laws. While we believe we have developed products that comply with the Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”) and other regulatory requirements, new laws,
regulations and interpretations could force us to further redesign our products. Any such product redesign could
consume significant capital, research and development and other resources, which could significantly increase
our operating costs.
Additionally, the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (“HITECH Act”),
which was enacted as part of the ARRA in 2009, significantly expanded HIPAA by extending the security
standards of HIPAA to “business associates” of healthcare providers that are covered entities under HIPAA.
Under the HITECH Act, business associates are required to establish administrative, physical and technical
safeguards and are subject to direct penalties for violations. Our business management services activities
frequently entail us acting in the capacity of a business associate to the hospitals that we serve, and therefore we
are covered by the patient privacy and security standards of HIPAA and subject to oversight of the Department of
Health and Human Services (“DHHS”). We believe that we have taken all necessary steps to comply with
HIPAA, as it applies to us as a business associate, but it is important to note that DHHS could, at any time in the
future, adopt new rules or modify existing rules in a manner that could require us to change our systems or
operations. There is no certainty that we will be able to respond to all such rules in a timely manner and our
inability to do so could adversely affect our business.
22
Our products assist clinical decision-making and related care by capturing, maintaining and reporting
relevant patient data. If our products fail to provide accurate and timely information, our customers could
assert claims against us that could result in substantial cost to us, harm our reputation in the industry and
cause demand for our products to decline.
We provide products that assist clinical decision-making and related care by capturing, maintaining and
reporting relevant patient data. Our products could fail or produce inaccurate results due to a variety of reasons,
including mechanical error, product flaws, faulty installation and/or human error during the initial data
conversion. If our products fail to provide accurate and timely information, customers and/or patients could sue
us to hold us responsible for losses they incur from these errors. These lawsuits, regardless of merit or outcome,
could result in substantial cost to us, divert management’s attention from operations and decrease market
acceptance of our products. We attempt to limit by contract our liability for damages arising from negligence,
errors or mistakes. Despite this precaution, such contract provisions may not be enforceable or may not otherwise
protect us from liability for damages. We maintain general liability insurance coverage, including coverage for
errors or omissions. However, this coverage may not be sufficient to cover one or more large claims against us or
otherwise continue to be available on terms acceptable to us. In addition, the insurer could disclaim coverage as
to any future claim.
Breaches of security in our system could result in customer claims against us and harm to our reputation
causing us to incur expenses and/or lose customers.
We have included security features in our systems that are intended to protect the privacy and integrity of
patient data. Despite the existence of these security features, our system may experience break-ins and similar
disruptive problems that could jeopardize the security of information stored in and transmitted through the
computer networks of our customers. Because of the sensitivity of medical information, customers could sue us
for breaches of security involving our system. Also, actual or perceived security breaches in our system could
harm the market perception of our products which could cause us to lose existing and prospective customers.
New products that we introduce or enhancements to our existing products may contain undetected errors or
problems that could affect customer satisfaction and cause a decrease in revenues.
Highly complex software products such as ours sometimes contain undetected errors or failures when first
introduced or when updates and new versions are released. Tests of our products may not detect bugs or errors
because it is difficult to simulate our customers’ wide variety of computing environments. Despite extensive
testing, from time to time we have discovered defects or errors in our products. Defects or errors discovered in
our products could cause delays in product introductions and shipments, result in increased costs and diversion of
development resources, require design modifications, decrease market acceptance or customer satisfaction with
our products, cause a loss of revenue, result in legal actions by our customers and cause increased insurance
costs.
Our facilities are located in an area vulnerable to hurricanes and tropical storms, and the occurrence of a
severe hurricane, similar storm or other natural disaster could cause damage to our facilities and equipment,
which could require us to cease or limit our operations.
Most of our facilities and employees are situated on one campus in Mobile, Alabama, which is located on
the coast of the Gulf of Mexico. Our facilities are vulnerable to significant damage or destruction from hurricanes
and tropical storms. We are also vulnerable to damage from other types of disasters, including tornadoes, fires,
floods and similar events. If any disaster were to occur, our ability to conduct business at our facilities could be
seriously impaired or completely destroyed. This would have adverse consequences for our customers who
depend on us for system support or business management services. Also, the servers of customers who use our
remote access services could be damaged or destroyed in any such disaster. This would have potentially
devastating consequences to those customers. Although we have an emergency recovery plan, including back-up
23
systems in remote locations, there can be no assurance that this plan will effectively prevent the interruption of
our business due to a natural disaster. Furthermore, the insurance we maintain may not be adequate to cover our
losses resulting from any natural disaster or other business interruption.
Interruptions in our power supply and/or telecommunications capabilities could disrupt our operations, cause
us to lose revenues and/or increase our expenses.
We currently have backup generators to be used as alternative sources of power in the event of a loss of
power to our facilities. If these generators were to fail during any power outage, we would be temporarily unable
to continue operations at our facilities. This would have adverse consequences for our customers who depend on
us for system support, business management and information technology management and professional services.
Any such interruption in operations at our facilities could damage our reputation, harm our ability to retain
existing customers and obtain new customers, and could result in lost revenue and increased insurance and other
operating costs.
We also have customers for whom we store and maintain computer servers containing critical patient and
administrative data. Those customers access this data remotely through telecommunications lines. If our power
generators fail during any power outage or if our telecommunications lines are severed or impaired for any
reason, those customers would be unable to access their mission critical data causing an interruption in their
operations. In such event our remote access customers and/or their patients could seek to hold us responsible for
any losses. We would also potentially lose those customers, and our reputation could be harmed.
If we are unable to attract and retain qualified customer service and support personnel, our business and
operating results will suffer.
Our customer service and support is a key component of our business. Most of our hospital customers have
small information technology staffs, and they depend on us to service and support their systems. Future difficulty
in attracting, training and retaining capable customer service and support personnel could cause a decrease in the
overall quality of our customer service and support. That decrease would have a negative effect on customer
satisfaction which could cause us to lose existing customers and could have an adverse effect on our new
customer sales. The loss of customers due to inadequate customer service and support would negatively impact
our ability to continue to grow our business.
We do not have employment or non-competition agreements with our key personnel, and their departure could
harm our future success.
Our future success depends to a significant extent on the leadership and performance of our chief executive
officer, chief operating officer and other executive officers. We do not have employment or non-competition
agreements with any of our executive officers. Therefore, they may terminate their employment with us at any
time and may compete against us. The loss of the services of any of our executive officers could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We have limited protection of our intellectual property and, if we fail to adequately protect our intellectual
property, we may not be able to compete effectively.
We consider some aspects of our internal operations, products and documentation to be proprietary. To
some extent we have relied on a combination of confidentiality provisions in our customer agreements,
copyright, trademark and trade secret laws and other measures to protect our intellectual property. To date,
however, we have not filed any patent applications to protect our proprietary software products. In addition,
existing copyright laws afford only limited protection. Although we attempt to control access to our intellectual
property, unauthorized persons may attempt to copy or otherwise use our intellectual property. Monitoring
unauthorized use of our intellectual property is difficult, and the steps we have taken may not prevent
24
unauthorized use. If our competitors gain access to our intellectual property, our competitive position in the
industry could be damaged. An inability to compete effectively could cause us to lose existing and potential
customers and experience lower revenues, revenue growth and profit margins.
In the event our products infringe on the intellectual property rights of third-parties, our business may suffer
if we are sued for infringement or if we cannot obtain licenses to these rights on commercially acceptable
terms.
Others may sue us alleging infringement of their intellectual property rights. Many participants in the
technology industry have an increasing number of patents and patent applications and have frequently
demonstrated a readiness to take legal action based on allegations of patent and other intellectual property
infringement. Further, as the number and functionality of our products increase, we believe we may become
increasingly subject to the risk of infringement claims. If infringement claims are brought against us, these
assertions could distract management. We may have to spend a significant amount of money and time to defend
or settle those claims. If we were found to infringe on the intellectual property rights of others, we could be
forced to pay significant license fees or damages for infringement. If we were unable to obtain licenses to these
rights on commercially acceptable terms, we would be required to discontinue the sale of our products that
contain the infringing technology. Our customers would also be required to discontinue the use of those products.
We are unable to insure against this risk on an economically feasible basis. Even if we were to prevail in an
infringement lawsuit, the accompanying publicity could adversely impact the demand for our system. Under
some circumstances, we agree to indemnify our customers for some types of infringement claims that may arise
from the use of our products.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2.
PROPERTIES
Our corporate campus is located on approximately 16.5 acres in Mobile, Alabama that consists of
approximately 135,500 square feet of office space. Our main campus headquarter building consists of
approximately 66,000 square feet of office and warehouse space. We also have eleven additional smaller campus
buildings consisting of approximately 6,000 square feet of office space each. Each of these smaller buildings is
designed to accommodate a team of employees assigned to install and support a particular software application.
We also occupy an additional campus building consisting of approximately 3,500 square feet of office space
which houses our sales personnel. The company also owns 11.3 acres of undeveloped real property adjacent to
our corporate campus.
We lease the 16.5 acres and all of our corporate campus buildings in Mobile, Alabama from a related party,
C.P. Investments, Inc., an Alabama corporation. The stockholders of C.P. Investment include, among other
persons, Ellen M. Harvey, Michael K. Muscat, Jr. and Susan M. Slaton who are children of M. Kenny Muscat, a
director of CPSI until his retirement in May 2010. Additionally, Michael K. Muscat, Jr. is one of our executive
officers. Our leases with C.P. Investments, Inc. expire at various times between April 2012 and December 2015.
The 11.3 acres of undeveloped property is directly owned by CPSI.
On January 1, 2007, we entered into a lease with Riverside Corporation to house a call center to support the
growth of our Business Management Services. This building consists of approximately 10,000 square feet and is
located in Lanett, Alabama.
On January 20, 2009, we entered into a lease agreement with Strauss Properties, LLC to house a call center
to further support the growth of our Business Management Services. This lease consists of approximately 10,800
square feet of space and is located in Monroe, Louisiana.
25
On May 13, 2009, we entered into a lease agreement with USA Research and Technology Corporation for
temporary office space to conduct training for newly hired support staff. It is anticipated that the lease for this
space will be vacated sometime in 2011.
On September 14, 2009, we entered into a lease agreement with 3725 Airport Boulevard, LP to house the
majority of our Business Management Services employees. This lease consists of approximately 32,240 square
feet and is located in Mobile, Alabama, approximately 5 miles from our corporate campus location.
We believe our existing facilities will be sufficient to meet our needs until the end of 2011 and beyond.
ITEM 3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time, we are involved in routine litigation that arises in the ordinary course of business. We are
not currently involved in any litigation that we believe could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
ITEM 4. RESERVED
None.
26
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market for CPSI Common Stock
At March 4, 2011, CPSI had 84 stockholders of record (which does not include the number of beneficial
owners whose shares are held in “street” names by broker-dealers and other nominees who are the record
holders) and 10,962,874 shares of common stock outstanding.
CPSI common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “CPSI.” The
following table sets forth, for the calendar quarters indicated, the high and low sales prices per share for CPSI’s
common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, and the cash dividends declared per share in each such
quarter:
2010
First Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Second Quarter
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Third Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fourth Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2009
First Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Second Quarter
Third Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fourth Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
High
Low
Dividends
Declared
Per Share
$49.37
47.26
46.35
49.49
$34.39
40.19
42.32
50.05
$33.92
36.15
38.60
41.28
$21.30
30.51
32.78
40.51
$0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
$0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
The last reported sales price of CPSI’s common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on
March 4, 2011 was $57.15.
Dividends
During 2010 and 2009 we paid a quarterly dividend in the amount of $0.36 per share. On January 27, 2011
we announced a dividend for the first quarter of 2011 in the amount of $0.36 per share. We believe that paying
dividends is an effective way of providing an investment return to our stockholders and a beneficial use of our
cash. However, the declaration of dividends by CPSI is subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors. Our
Board of Directors will take into account such matters as general business conditions, our financial results and
such other factors as our Board of Directors may deem relevant.
27
ITEM 6.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
INCOME DATA:
Total sales revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total costs of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total other income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income before taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income per share—basic . . . . . . . .
Net income per share—diluted . . . . . .
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BALANCE SHEET DATA
Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . .
Working capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total stockholders' equity . . . . . . . . . .
Year Ended December 31,
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
(in thousands except for share and per share data)
$
153,247
88,863
$
127,742
74,483
$
119,664
66,443
$
110,013
63,257
$
115,974
64,269
64,384
35,287
29,097
674
29,771
11,033
18,738
1.71
1.71
$
$
$
53,259
29,890
23,369
728
24,097
8,914
15,183
1.39
1.39
$
$
$
53,221
29,510
23,711
940
24,651
9,213
15,438
1.42
1.42
$
$
$
46,756
27,708
19,048
1,203
20,251
7,335
12,916
1.20
1.19
$
$
$
51,705
27,039
24,666
1,132
25,798
9,983
15,815
1.47
1.46
10,962,874
10,962,874
10,953,747
10,955,167
10,849,060
10,867,669
10,795,013
10,837,817
10,746,476
10,839,050
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
As of December 31,
$
2,940
35,135
62,735
14,485
46,464
$
4,387
34,426
54,450
11,247
42,691
$
11,744
33,223
52,867
11,852
40,559
$
11,806
31,118
50,408
11,459
38,378
8,760
30,563
47,905
8,690
38,706
$
$
$
$
28
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations in conjunction
with “Selected Financial Data” and our financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this
Annual Report. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties
and assumptions. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking
statements as a result of many factors, including but not limited to those set forth under “Risk Factors” and
elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Background
CPSI was founded in 1979 and specializes in delivering comprehensive healthcare information systems and
related services to community hospitals. Our systems and services are designed to support the primary functional
areas of a hospital and to enhance access to needed financial and clinical information. Our comprehensive system
enables healthcare providers to improve clinical, financial and administrative outcomes. Our products and
services provide solutions in key areas, including patient management, financial management, patient care and
clinical, enterprise and office automation. In addition to servicing small to medium-sized hospitals, we provide
information technology services to other related entities in the healthcare industry, such as nursing homes, home
health agencies and physician clinics.
We sell a fully integrated, enterprise-wide financial and clinical hospital information system comprised of
all necessary software, hardware, peripherals, forms and office supplies, together with comprehensive customer
service and support. We also offer business management services, including electronic billing submissions,
patient statement processing and accounts receivable management, as part of our overall information system
solution. We believe that as our customer base grows, the demand for our business management services will
also continue to grow, supporting further increases in recurring revenues.
Our system currently is installed and operating in over 650 hospitals in 46 states and the District of
Columbia. Our customers consist of community hospitals with 300 or fewer acute care beds, with hospitals
having 100 or fewer acute care beds comprising approximately 94% of our customers.
Management Overview
We primarily seek revenue growth through sales of healthcare information technology systems and related
services to existing and new customers within our historic target market. Our strategy has produced consistent
revenue growth over the long-term, as reflected in five-and ten-year compounded annual growth rates in
revenues of approximately 7.1% and 12.0%, respectively. Selling new and additional products and services back
into our existing customer base is an important part of CPSI’s future revenue growth. We believe that as our
customer base grows, the demand for additional products and services, including business management services,
will also continue to grow, supporting further increases in recurring revenues. We also expect to drive revenue
growth from new product development that we may generate from our research and development activities.
In addition to revenue growth, our business model is focused on earnings growth. Once a hospital has
installed our system, we continue to provide support and maintenance services to our customers on an ongoing
basis. These services are typically provided by the same personnel who perform our system installations but at a
reduced cost to us, and therefore at an increased gross margin. We also look to increase margins through cost
containment measures where appropriate.
As a result of the recent economic recession and credit crisis, hospitals have experienced reduced
availability of third party credit and an overall reduction in their investment portfolios. In addition, healthcare
organizations with a large dependency on Medicare and Medicaid populations, such as community based
29
hospitals, have been impacted by the challenging financial condition of the Federal government and many state
governments and government programs. Accordingly, we recognize that prospective hospital customers often do
not have the necessary capital to make investments in information technology. Additionally, in response to these
challenges, hospitals have become more selective regarding where they invest capital, resulting in a focus on
strategic spending that generates a return on their investment. Despite the current economic environment, we
believe healthcare information technology is often viewed as more strategic to hospitals than other possible
purchases because the technology offers the possibility of a quick return on investment. Information technology
also plays an important role in healthcare by improving safety, efficiency and reducing cost. Additionally, we
believe most hospitals recognize that they must invest in healthcare information technology to meet current and
future regulatory, compliance and government reimbursement requirements.
We have experienced an increase in customers seeking financing arrangements from us over the past three
years for system installations as a result of recent and ongoing economic conditions and disruptions in credit
markets. Historically, we have made financing arrangements available to customers on a case-by-case basis
depending upon various aspects of the proposed contract and customer attributes. These financing arrangements
include short-term payment plans, longer-term lease financing through us and our facilitating third-party
financing arrangements. We intend to continue to work with prospective customers to provide for financing
arrangements to purchase our systems so long as such arrangements do not adversely affect our financial position
and liquidity. We believe that meeting the financial needs of community-based hospitals while allowing for the
profitable expansion of our footprint in this market will remain both an opportunity and a challenge for us in the
foreseeable future.
Despite the recent economic recession, including the credit crisis, we have not experienced a decline in
demand for our products and services. We have experienced some slowing of customer payments during 2010,
and expect this trend to continue at least through 2011 or until the economy shows significant signs of recovery.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
While the recent economic recession and credit crisis has impacted and could continue to impact the
community hospitals that comprise our target market, we believe that the American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act of 2009 (the “ARRA”), has increased and will continue to increase demand for healthcare information
technology and will have a positive impact on our business prospects. The ARRA includes more than $19 billion
in funding to aid healthcare organizations in modernizing their operations through the acquisition and wide-
spread use of healthcare information technology. Included in the funding is approximately $17.2 billion in
incentives through Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement systems to encourage and assist healthcare providers
in adopting and using electronic health records (“EHRs”). These incentive payments began in February 2011 and
are expected to last through September 2015. If an eligible healthcare provider does not begin to demonstrate
meaningful use of EHRs by 2015, then reimbursement under Medicare will begin to be reduced. Some of our
hospital customers began receiving some of these incentive payments under the ARRA in February 2011.
We have been focused on ensuring that we take the necessary steps to meet the needs of community
hospitals to help them gain access to the incentives made available under the ARRA. Primary among those steps
was ensuring that our technology meets the ARRA’s EHR certification requirements. During 2010, both our
hospital and medical practice EHR solutions were certified as a complete EHR by CCHIT®. Receiving this
certification for both our hospital and ambulatory EHR products ensures that both hospitals and providers using
our EHR systems can attain “meaningful use” of EHRs and qualify for ARRA reimbursements. As a result of our
obtaining this certification, the ARRA has had, and we believe will continue to have, a positive impact on our
business and the businesses of the community hospitals that comprise our target market.
30
Health Care Reform
In March 2010, President Obama signed into law the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the
Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, collectively referred to as the “Healthcare Legislation.”
This sweeping legislation implements changes to the healthcare and health insurance industries over the next
several years through 2015, with the ultimate goal of requiring substantially all U.S. citizens and legal residents
to have qualifying health insurance coverage by 2014 and providing the means by which it will be made
available to them. We anticipate that the Healthcare Legislation will have little direct impact on our internal
operation but may have a significant impact on the business of our hospital customers. We have not been able to
determine at this point whether the impact will be positive, negative or neutral; however, it is likely that the
Healthcare Legislation will affect hospitals differently depending upon the populations they service. Community
hospitals typically service higher uninsured populations than larger urban hospitals and rely more heavily on
Medicare and Medicaid for reimbursement. It remains to be seen whether the increase in the insured populations
for community hospitals, as well as the increase in Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements under ARRA for
hospitals that implement EHR technology, will be enough to offset proposed cuts in Medicare and Medicaid
reimbursements contained in the Healthcare Legislation.
We believe healthcare initiatives will continue during the foreseeable future. If adopted, some aspects of
previously proposed reforms, such as further reductions in Medicare and Medicaid payments, could adversely
affect the businesses of our customers and thereby harm our business.
Financial Overview
Our gross revenues in 2010 increased 20.0% from 2009, while our net income increased 23.4%. Cash flow
from operations increased 122.9% from 2009 due to an increase in net income and other liabilities, offset
partially by an increase in accounts receivable. We continued to experience increased levels of customers seeking
financing arrangements for system installation during 2010 due to continued challenging economic conditions
and unavailability of third-party credit. We will grant financing arrangements to customers on a case-by-case
basis depending upon various aspects of the proposed contract and customer attributes. While our operating cash
flows increased during 2010, we utilized some of these funds to invest in new facilities that house our business
management services operations. We have maintained a strong cash position that we believe is sufficient to meet
our operating requirements. We believe that a strong cash position enables us to compete better in the
marketplace and maintain the quality of our customer service and product offerings.
Revenues
The Company recognizes its multiple element arrangements, including software and software-related
services, using the residual method under SEC accounting guidelines. Revenue from general support agreements
for post-contract support services (support and maintenance) and information technology management and
professional services are recognized by the Company ratably over the term of the agreement.
System Sales. Revenues from system sales are derived from the sale of information systems (including
software, conversion and installation services, hardware, peripherals, forms and office supplies) to new
customers and from the sale of new or additional products to existing customers. We do not record revenue upon
the execution of a sales contract. Upon the execution of a contract to purchase a system from us, each customer
pays a non-refundable 10% deposit that is recorded as deferred revenue. The customer pays 40% of the purchase
price for the software and the related installation, training and conversion when we install the system and
commence on-site training at the customer’s facility, which is likewise recorded as deferred revenue. When the
system begins operating in a live environment, the remaining 50% of the system purchase price for each module
that has been installed is payable. Revenue from the sale of the software perpetual license and the system
installation and training is recognized on a module by module basis after the installation and training have been
completed and the system is functioning as designed for each individual module. Revenue from the sale of
hardware is recognized upon shipment of the hardware to the customer.
31
Support and Maintenance. We also derive revenues from the provision of system support services, including
software application support, hardware maintenance, continuing education and related services. Support services
are provided pursuant to a support agreement under which we provide comprehensive system support and related
services in exchange for a monthly fee based on the services provided. The initial term of these contracts ranges
from one to seven years, with a typical duration of five years. Upon expiration of the initial term, these contracts
renew automatically on a year-to-year basis thereafter until terminated. Revenues from support services are
recognized in the month when these services are performed.
We provide our products to some customers utilizing the “Software as a Service” model, or “SaaS.” We
provide SaaS services on a remote access basis by storing and maintaining servers at our headquarters which
contain customers’ patient and administrative data. These customers then access this data remotely in exchange
for a monthly fee. In addition, as part of our total information solution, we serve as an Internet service provider,
or “ISP,” for some of our customers for a monthly fee. We also provide web-site design, hosting services, and
other information technology management and professional services if needed. Revenues from our SaaS and ISP
services are recognized in the month when these services are performed.
Business Management Services. Our business management services include electronic billing, statement
processing, payroll processing and business office management (primarily accounts receivable management).
Most of these business management services are sold pursuant to one-year customer agreements, with automatic
one year renewals until terminated. Revenues from business management services are recognized when these
services are performed.
Costs of Sales
System Sales. The principal costs associated with the design, development, sale and installation of our
systems are employee salaries, benefits, travel expenses and certain other overhead expenses. These costs are
expensed as incurred. For the sale of equipment, we incur costs to acquire these products from the respective
distributors or manufacturers. The costs related to the acquisition of equipment are capitalized into inventory and
expensed upon the sale of the equipment utilizing the average cost method.
Support and Maintenance. The principal costs associated with our system support and maintenance services
are employee salaries, benefits and certain other overhead expenses. These costs are expensed as incurred.
Our employees that perform system installations also provide support and maintenance services. We attempt
to allocate their time equally between the two functions to provide them with an equal amount of time at home
providing support services versus travelling away from home performing system installations. As such, salary
related expenses are allocated between cost of system sales and cost of support and maintenance services based
upon an estimate of the percentage of time employees spend performing each function. We had 505 software
installation and support employees as of December 31, 2010 compared to 443 as of December 31, 2009.
Business Management Services. The principal cost related to our statement processing services is postage.
The principal costs related to our electronic billing services are employee related expenses, such as salaries and
benefits, and long distance telecommunication fees. Supplies and forms represent an additional cost associated
with our business management services. These costs are expensed as incurred.
32
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth certain items included in our results of operations for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2010, expressed as a percentage of our total revenues for these periods (dollar
amounts in thousands):
INCOME DATA:
Sales revenues:
System sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Support and maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Business management services . . . . . . . . . . .
Total sales revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Costs of sales:
System sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Support and maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Business management services . . . . . . . . . . .
Total costs of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross profit
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
General and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other income (expense):
Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total other income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income before taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2010 Compared to 2009
Year Ended December 31,
2010
2009
2008
Amount % Sales
Amount % Sales
Amount % Sales
$ 61,253
59,259
32,735
153,247
40.0% $ 42,455
38.7% 55,885
21.4% 29,402
100.0% 127,742
33.2% $ 41,581
43.7% 53,324
23.0% 24,759
100.0% 119,664
34.7%
44.6%
20.7%
100.0%
46,801
23,923
18,139
88,863
64,384
11,605
23,682
35,287
29,097
674
674
29,771
11,033
$ 18,738
30.6% 35,822
15.6% 21,628
11.8% 17,033
58.0% 74,483
42.0% 53,259
9,081
7.7%
15.5% 20,809
23.0% 29,890
19.0% 23,369
728
0.4%
0.4%
728
19.4% 24,097
8,914
7.2%
12.2% $ 15,183
28.1% 32,499
16.9% 19,349
13.3% 14,595
58.3% 66,443
41.7% 53,221
8,872
7.2%
16.3% 20,638
23.4% 29,510
18.3% 23,711
940
0.6%
0.6%
940
18.9% 24,651
9,213
7.0%
11.9% $ 15,438
27.3%
16.2%
12.2%
55.5%
44.5%
7.5%
17.2%
24.7%
19.8%
0.8%
0.8%
20.6%
7.7%
12.9%
Revenues. Total revenues increased by 20.0%, or $25.5 million, from 2009. This was largely attributable to
an increase in system sales of clinical applications to existing customers attempting to attain “meaningful use” of
EHRs under the ARRA.
System sales revenues increased by 44.3%, or $18.8 million, compared to 2009. We completed financial and
patient software system installations at 44 new hospital clients in 2010, compared to installations at 33 new
hospital clients in 2009. System sales to existing customers in 2010 was 64.0% of total revenues as compared to
66.8% for 2009.
Support and maintenance revenues increased by 6.0%, or $3.4 million, from 2009. The increase in revenues
from support and maintenance was attributable to an increase in recurring revenues as a result of additional
support and maintenance services to existing customers. We had 670 customers at December 31, 2010, compared
to 652 at December 31, 2009. SaaS revenues increased by 15.53%, or $0.4 million, while ISP services revenues
declined slightly during the year.
Business management service revenues increased by 11.3%, or $3.3 million, from 2009. Business
management service revenues increased as a result of continued growth in accounts receivable management,
insurance follow-up and contract management services. Electronic billing revenues increased 3.6%, or
33
$0.1 million, and business office services increased 16.4%, or $3.0 million. We were providing our full suite of
business management services to 30 customers at December 31, 2010, compared to 26 customers at
December 31, 2009.
Costs of Sales. Total costs of sales increased by 19.3%, or $14.4 million, from 2009. As a percentage of
revenues, cost of sales decreased slightly to 58.0% for 2010, from 58.3% for 2009.
Cost of system sales increased by 30.6%, or $11.0 million, from 2009. The increase in cost of system sales
was due to an increase in system installations during the year. The gross margin on system sales increased to
23.6% in 2010 from 15.6% in 2009. As a percentage of system sales, payroll and related expenses decreased to
34.9% in 2010 from 43.9% in 2009 as a result of higher utilization of employees performing system installations
versus support and maintenance; travel expense as a percentage of system sales decreased to 16.5% from 17.3%;
cost of software as a percentage of system sales increased to 4.2% from 2.6% due to the purchase of additional
third-party software licenses in 2010 to add functionality to our customers’ operating system environments; and
cost of equipment as a percentage of system sales increased to 19.2% in 2010 compared to 18.8% in 2009, due to
increased supplier prices. We anticipate that the margins on system sales should remain stable through at least the
first half of 2011. Year over year, payroll and related costs increased 14.8%, or $2.8 million, cost of equipment
increased 47.5%, or $3.9 million, cost of software increased 132.5%, or $1.5 million, and travel and related costs
increased 38.1%, or $2.8 million.
Cost of support and maintenance increased 10.6%, or $2.3 million, from 2009. The gross margin on support
and maintenance revenues decreased to 59.6% for 2010 from 61.3% for 2009. Year over year, the increase in the
cost of support and maintenance was due to an increase in payroll and related costs of 14.2%, or $2.6 million, as
the result of additional personnel. Because the same employee groups that perform system installations also
provide support and maintenance services, the gross margins for the two services can fluctuate inversely as
employees spend more time performing system installations, while the allocation of their salaries remains the
same. We anticipate that costs of support and maintenance will remain elevated at least through the first half of
2011 if the number of system installations remains at current levels.
Our costs associated with business management services increased 6.5%, or $1.1 million, from 2009. The
gross margin on business management services increased to 44.6% for 2010 from 42.1% for 2009 due to the
realization of economies of scale of our existing business management staff across a larger customer base.
Payroll and related expenses increased $0.5 million due to additional employees hired to support our growing
business office management services. Occupancy costs increased $0.3 million due to the opening of our new
facility to house our business management service in June 2010. Postage costs increased $0.1 million as a result
of a postage rate increase in May 2010.
Sales and Marketing Expenses. Sales and marketing expenses increased 27.8%, or $2.5 million, from 2009.
The increase was attributable to increased sales commission expense.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses increased 13.8%, or $2.8
million, from 2009. Group health insurance expense increased $0.8 million during the year as the result of
negative claims experience. We began an employee wellness program in 2009 to hopefully stem the trend of
increasing health care costs. Expenses for this program cost approximately $0.2 million in 2010. Legal and
accounting expense increased $0.4 million during the year as the result of a non-recurring expense related to an
internal investigation conducted by the Company in 2010. Expenses related to our customer user group increased
$0.3 due to the hosting of its annual convention in a more expensive location in 2010.
As a result of the foregoing factors, income before taxes increased by 23.5%, or $5.7 million, from 2009.
Income Taxes. Our effective income tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was 37.1%
and 37.0%, respectively. We utilized research and development tax credits to lower our effective tax rate in 2010
and 2009. We also utilized in 2009 employment tax credits made available under the Gulf Opportunity Zone Act
of 2005, related to Hurricane Katrina, but this credit was not renewed for 2010. We anticipate our effective
income tax rate in 2011 to be approximately 38%.
34
2009 Compared to 2008
Revenues. Total revenues increased by 6.8%, or $8.1 million, from 2008. There were no significant changes
in the makeup or mix of our revenue streams from 2008 to 2009.
System sales revenues increased by 2.1%, or $0.9 million, compared to 2008. We completed financial and
patient software system installations at 33 new hospital clients in 2009, compared to installations at 27 new
hospital clients in 2008. System sales to existing customers in 2009 was 66.8% of total revenues as compared to
62.7% for 2008.
Support and maintenance revenues increased by 4.8%, or $2.6 million, from 2008. The increase in revenues
from support and maintenance was attributable to an increase in recurring revenues as a result of additional
support and maintenance services to existing customers. We had 652 customers at December 31, 2009, compared
to 656 at December 31, 2008. ASP services revenues increased by 15.3%, or $0.3 million, while ISP services
revenues declined slightly during the year.
Business management service revenues increased by 18.8%, or $4.6 million, from 2008. Business
management service revenues increased as a result of continued growth in customer demand for electronic billing
and business office services such as private pay collections, insurance follow-up services and contract
management services. Electronic billing revenues increased 9.4%, or $0.4 million, and business office services
increased 22.8%, or $3.1 million. We were providing our full suite of business management services to 26
customers at December 31, 2009, compared to 20 customers at December 31, 2008.
Costs of Sales. Total costs of sales increased by 12.1%, or $8.0 million, from 2008. As a percentage of
revenues, cost of sales increased to 58.3% for 2009, from 55.5% for 2008.
Cost of system sales increased by 10.2%, or $3.3 million, from 2008. The increase in cost of system sales
was due to an increase in payroll and related costs due to additional personnel hired in anticipation of increased
business from the ARRA. The gross margin on system sales decreased to 15.6% in 2009 from 21.8% in 2008. As
a percentage of system sales, payroll and related expenses increased to 43.9% in 2009 from 38.5% in 2008, and
travel expense increased to 17.3% from 15.2%. Cost of software decreased to 2.6% from 4.3% due to the switch
to Linux from Unix operating systems for most of our customers. Cost of equipment remained relatively flat at
18.8% in 2009 compared to 19.1% in 2008.
Cost of support and maintenance increased 11.8%, or $2.3 million, from 2008. The increase in the cost of
support and maintenance was due to an increase in payroll and related costs of 14.5%, or $2.3 million, as the
result of additional hiring in anticipation of increased business from the ARRA. The gross margin on support and
maintenance revenues decreased to 61.3% for 2009 from 63.7% for 2008. Because the same personnel that
conduct system installations also provide support and maintenance services, the hiring of additional personnel
affects both services relatively equally.
Our costs associated with business management services increased 16.7%, or $2.4 million, from 2008. The
gross margin on business management services increased to 42.1% for 2009 from 41.1% for 2008 due to the
realization of economies of scale of our existing business management staff across a larger customer base.
Payroll related expenses increased $0.3 million due to additional employees hired to support our growing
business office management services. Contract labor increased $1.7 million as we moved to utilizing more
staffing services to control turnover and benefit costs. Postage costs increased $0.3 million as a result of an
increase in transaction volumes as well as a postage rate increase in May of 2009. We opened a new business
management services office in Monroe, Louisiana during the first half of 2009 which temporarily impacted costs
during the ramp-up phase to get this office fully operational.
Sales and Marketing Expenses. Sales and marketing expenses increased 2.4%, or $0.2 million, from 2008.
The increase was attributable to increased sales commission expense.
35
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses remained relatively flat,
increasing only 0.8%, or $0.2 million, from 2008. Bad debt expense decreased $0.3 million from 2008 even
though we saw some slowing of collections in the second half of 2009. Bad debt expense in 2008 was largely
effected by a single customer, whereas bad debt exposure in 2009 was much less concentrated. Group health
insurance expense increased $0.8 million during the year as the result of negative claims experience. We began a
wellness program during the year to hopefully stem the trend of increasing healthcare costs. Legal and
accounting expense decreased $0.2 million during the year as the result of non-recurring expenses and contract
settlements in 2008. Shipping costs also decreased $0.2 million due to better contract negotiation with shippers.
As a result of the foregoing factors, income before taxes decreased by 2.2%, or $0.6 million, from 2008.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2010, we had $2.9 million in cash and cash equivalents. Management believes that cash
and investments plus cash generated from our normal operating activities should be adequate to fund our
business through the remainder of 2011. Our principal source of liquidity has been cash provided by operating
activities. Cash provided by operating activities has been used primarily to fund the growth in our business and
return cash to our shareholders in the form of dividends. Because of our cash position, our Board of Directors
decided to begin paying a quarterly dividend in 2003. We declared and paid dividends in the aggregate amount of
$15.8 million in 2010, $15.8 million in 2009, and $15.6 million in 2008. We believe that paying dividends is an
effective way of providing an investment return to our stockholders and a beneficial use of our cash. However,
the declaration of dividends by CPSI is subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors. Our Board of
Directors will continue to take into account such matters as general business conditions, our financial results and
such other factors as our Board of Directors may deem relevant.
Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $19.6 million, $8.8 million and $15.7 million for 2010,
2009 and 2008, respectively. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities in 2010 predominantly
resulted from an increase in net income and an increase in other liabilities.
Net cash used in investing activities totaled $5.3 million, $2.2 million and $1.6 million for 2010, 2009 and
2008, respectively. In 2010, we purchased $5.1 million of property and equipment, approximately $3.0 million of
which related to the build-out and furnishing of our new business management services operations facility. We
also purchased investments in the net amount of $0.2 million which are classified as available for sale. In 2009,
we had net purchases of investments in the amount of $1.3 million which are classified as available for sale. We
also purchased $0.8 million of property and equipment. In 2008, we used cash of $0.5 million for the purchase of
investments and $1.1 million for the purchase of property and equipment.
Net cash used in financing activities totaled $15.8 million, $14.0 million and $14.2 million for 2010, 2009
and 2008, respectively. During 2010, we declared and paid dividends in the aggregate amount of $15.8 million.
During 2009, we declared and paid dividends in the aggregate amount of $15.8 million. We also received
proceeds of $1.3 million and a tax benefit of $0.4 million from the exercise of employee stock options. During
2008, we declared and paid dividends in the aggregate amount of $15.6 million and received proceeds of $1.2
million and a tax benefit of $0.2 million from the exercise of employee stock options.
Our days sales outstanding for the years 2010, 2009 and 2008 were 60, 56 and 48 days, respectively.
We currently do not have a bank line of credit or other credit facility in place. Because we have no debt, we
are not subject to contractual restrictions or other influences on our operations, such as payment demands and
restrictions on the use of operating funds that are typically associated with debt. If we borrow money in the
future, we will likely be subject to operating and financial covenants that could limit our ability to operate as
profitably as we have in the past. Defaults under applicable loan agreements could result in the demand by
lenders for immediate payment of substantial funds and substantial restrictions on expenditures, among other
things. Due to the current economic recession and disruption in the capital and credit markets, additional capital,
if needed, may not be available on terms favorable to the Company, or at all.
36
Related Party Transactions
We lease 16.5 acres and all of our campus headquarter buildings in Mobile, Alabama from a related party,
C.P. Investments, Inc., an Alabama corporation. The stockholders of C.P. Investment include, among other
persons, Ellen M. Harvey, Michael K. Muscat, Jr. and Susan M. Slaton, who are the children of M. Kenny
Muscat, a director of the Company until May 2010. Additionally, Mr. Michael K. Muscat, Jr. is one of our
executive officers. In 2010, we made total lease payments in the amount of $1,697,478 to C.P. Investments, Inc.
Under these lease agreements, we expect to make annual lease payments in 2011 in the amount of $1,697,478,
subject to adjustment as set forth in the agreements. The annual rent payable under these leases has been
determined by an independent, third-party appraisal firm.
Contractual Obligations
Our real estate leases, most of which are with related parties as described above, are the only material
contractual obligations requiring payments in the future. Our payments under these leases subsequent to
December 31, 2010, are set forth below:
Contractual Obligations
Payment due by period
Total
Less than
1 year
1-3 Years
3-5 Years
More than
5 years
Operating lease obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$5,275,331
2,243,106
2,009,883
1,022,342
—
The table above excludes any amounts related to the $698,000 of unrecognized tax benefit as the Company
cannot make a reasonably reliable estimate of the periods of cash settlements with the respective taxing
authorities. See Note 5 to the financial statements for additional information.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Our only off-balance sheet arrangement, as defined by Item 303(a)(4) of SEC Regulation S-K, consists of
our guarantee of certain lease obligations of Solis Healthcare, LP (“Solis Healthcare”) to Winthrop Resources
Corporation (“Winthrop”) under a lease agreement. Solis Healthcare purchased a software system from the
Company and then entered into a sale-leaseback transaction with Winthrop in the first quarter of 2008. We
provided this guarantee in order to facilitate Solis Healthcare in leasing the new system.
The lease has an initial term of five years and continues from year-to-year thereafter until terminated. We
are contingently liable as guarantor under the lease such that, if at any time prior to the termination of the lease,
Solis Healthcare (i) enters into bankruptcy or (ii) defaults for more than 60 days in its payments or performance
under the lease, we will be obligated to perform under the guaranty by making the required lease payments,
including late fees and penalties. The guaranty runs for the entire term of the lease; however, the maximum
potential amount of future payments that we would be required to make to Winthrop under the guaranty is
$1,400,040, the balance of the lease as of December 31, 2010, plus any fees and costs that Winthrop incurs in
collecting amounts due under the lease (including attorney’s fees and costs). We recorded $2,154,389, the
amount billed to date for the new system installation, as revenue during the first quarter of 2008. Due to the
contingent nature of the guaranty, the maximum amount of the guaranty is not recorded on our balance sheet;
however, when necessary, we record reserves to cover potential losses. A liability in the amount of $55,625, the
amortized fair value of the guaranty, is recorded on our balance sheet as an other accrued liability at
December 31, 2010. See Note 11 to the financial statements for additional information.
Critical Accounting Policies
General. Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our
financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America. We are required to make some estimates and judgments that affect the preparation
37
of these financial statements. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions
that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, but actual results may differ from these estimates under
different assumptions or conditions.
Revenue Recognition. We recognize revenue in accordance with the accounting principles required by the
Software topic and Revenue Recognition subtopic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)
Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”) and those prescribed by the SEC. These standards
require that four basic criteria must be met before revenues can be recognized: (1) persuasive evidence that an
arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; (3) the fee is fixed and
determinable; and (4) collectibility is reasonably assured. Determination of criteria (3) and (4) are based on our
judgment regarding the fixed nature of the fee charged for services rendered and products delivered and the
collectibility of those fees. Should changes in conditions cause us to determine these criteria are not met for
certain future transactions, revenues recognized for any reporting period could be adversely affected.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. Trade accounts receivable are stated at the amount the Company expects
to collect and do not bear interest. The collectibility of trade receivable balances is regularly evaluated based on a
combination of factors such as customer credit-worthiness, past transaction history with the customer, current
economic industry trends and changes in customer payment patterns. If it is determined that a customer will be
unable to fully meet its financial obligation, such as in the case of a bankruptcy filing or other material events
impacting its business, a specific reserve for bad debt is recorded to reduce the related receivable to the amount
expected to be recovered.
Allowance for Credit Losses. The Company leases its information and patient care systems to certain
healthcare providers under sales-type leases. The Company establishes an allowance for credit losses for these
financing receivables based on the historical level of customer defaults under such financing arrangements. See
Note 8 to the financial statements for further information about our financing receivables.
Stock-Based Compensation. The Company accounts for stock-based compensation according to the FASB
Codification topic, Compensation – Stock Compensation. See Note 6 to the financial statements for further
discussion of the impact on the Company’s earnings.
Estimates. The Company uses estimates to record certain transactions and liabilities. These estimates are
generally based on management’s best judgment, past experience, and utilization of third party services such as
actuarial and other expert services. Because these estimates are subjective and variable, actual results could differ
significantly from these estimates. Significant estimates included in our financial statements include those for
self-insurance reserves under our health insurance plan, reserves for uncertain tax positions, bad debt allowances
and legal liability exposure or lack thereof.
Backlog
Backlog consists of revenues we reasonably expect to recognize over the next twelve months under existing
contracts. The revenues to be recognized may relate to a combination of one-time fees for system sales, and
recurring fees for support, business management, SaaS and ISP services. As of December 31, 2010, we had a
twelve-month backlog of approximately $33.6 million in connection with non-recurring system purchases and
approximately $92.4 million in connection with recurring payments under support, business management, SaaS
and ISP contracts. Our backlog increase is the result of an incremental increase in the number of contracts for
system sales signed during 2010 and that are yet to be installed, as well as an increase in our customer base for
recurring business.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market and Interest Rate Risk
Our exposure to market risk relates primarily to the potential change in the value of our investment portfolio
as a result of fluctuations in interest rates. The primary purpose of our investment activities is to preserve
principal while maximizing the income we receive from our investments without significantly increasing risk of
38
loss. As of December 31, 2010, our investment portfolio consisted of a variety of financial instruments,
including, but not limited to, money market securities and high quality government and corporate obligations. It
is our intent to ensure the safety and preservation of our invested principal funds by limiting default risk, market
risk, and reinvestment risk. We do not hold financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes. The
securities in our investment portfolio are classified as available-for-sale and, consequently, are recorded on our
balance sheet as a current asset at fair market value with their unrealized gain or loss reflected as a component of
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders’ equity.
Investments in both fixed rate and floating rate interest earning instruments carry a degree of interest rate
risk. Fixed rate securities may have their fair market value adversely impacted due to a rise in interest rates,
while floating rate securities may produce less income than expected if interest rates fall. Due in part to these
factors, our future investment income may fall short of expectation due to changes in interest rates or we may
suffer losses in principal if forced to sell securities which have declined in market value due to changes in
interest rates.
We believe that the market risk arising from our holdings of these financial instruments is minimal. Due to
the conservative allocation of our investment portfolio, we do not believe that an immediate 10% increase in
interest rates would have a material effect on the market value of our portfolio. Since we have the ability to
liquidate this portfolio, we do not expect our operating results or cash flows to be materially effected to any
significant degree by a sudden change in market interest rates on our investment portfolio. We do not utilize
derivative financial instruments to manage the interest rate risks associated with our investments.
The table that follows presents fair values of principal amounts and weighted average interest rates for our
investment portfolio as of December 31, 2010 and 2009.
Aggregate Fair Value
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate
2010
2009
2010
2009
Cash and Cash Equivalents:
Cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Certificates of deposit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$2,939,839
—
0.00% 0.00%
$1,632,503
2,754,260 — 0.70%
Total cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$2,939,839
$4,386,763
Short-Term Investments: (1)
Accrued Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Money market funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
U.S. Treasury bills . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Obligations of the U.S. Treasury, U.S Government corporations
and agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 119,574
71,782
330,000
$ 151,790
160,105
0.00% 0.00%
0.22% 0.40%
— 0.21% 0.00%
1,875,448
2,686,791
2,495,033
2,746,915
2.20% 3.47%
4.67% 5.36%
Total short-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5,083,595
$5,553,843
Long-Term Investments: (2)
Obligations of the U.S. Treasury, U.S Government corporations
and agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mortgage backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$3,350,091
121,571
4,846,666
$2,167,663
153,820
5,367,792
0.82% 1.89%
5.00% 5.00%
4.36% 4.65%
Total long-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8,318,328
$7,689,275
(1) Reflects instruments with a contractual maturity of less than one year.
(2) Reflects instruments with a contractual maturity of one year or more.
39
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Reference is made to Note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of accounting pronouncements that
have been recently issued which we have not yet adopted.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The information required by this item is contained in Item 7 herein under the heading “Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures about Market and Interest Rate Risk.”
40
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Index to Financial Statements
Page
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
42
Report of Grant Thornton LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, on Financial
Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
43
Report of Grant Thornton LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance Sheets — December 31, 2010 and 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Statements of Income — Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Statements of Stockholders’ Equity — Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Statements of Cash Flows — Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Notes to Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
44
45
46
47
48
49
Index to Financial Statement Schedules
Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
63
All other schedules to the financial statements required by Article 9 of Regulation S-X are not applicable
and therefore have been omitted.
41
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Computer Programs and
Systems, Inc.’s (“CPSI”) internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. CPSI’s internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that:
(i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of CPSI;
(ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of CPSI are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors
of CPSI; and
(iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition,
use or disposition of CPSI’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of CPSI’s internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2010. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework.
Based on our assessment and those criteria, management believes that CPSI maintained effective internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010.
The independent registered public accounting firm, Grant Thornton LLP, has audited the financial
statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010, and has also issued their report on the effectiveness
of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting included in this report on page 44.
42
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
ON FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
Computer Programs and Systems, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Computer Programs and Systems, Inc. (a Delaware
corporation) as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010. Our audits of the basic financial
statements included the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 8. These financial
statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of Computer Programs and Systems, Inc.’s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement
schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Computer Programs and Systems, Inc. as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010 in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the related
financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States), Computer Programs and Systems, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report dated March 7,
2011 expressed an unqualified opinion.
/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
March 7, 2011
43
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Computer Programs and Systems Inc.:
We have audited Computer Programs and Systems, Inc.’s (a Delaware Corporation) internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Computer Programs and Systems, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control
over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on Computer Programs and Systems, Inc.’s internal control over financial
reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit
included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material
weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the
assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Computer Programs and Systems, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control—
Integrated Framework issued by COSO.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States), the balance sheets of Computer Programs and Systems, Inc. as of December 31, 2010 and 2009
and the related statements of income, stockholder’s equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2010, and our report dated March 7, 2011, expressed an unqualified opinion.
/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
March 7, 2011
44
COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND SYSTEMS, INC.
Balance Sheets
December 31,
2010
December 31,
2009
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $969,000
and $759,000, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financing receivables, current portion, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 2,939,839
13,401,923
$ 4,386,763
13,243,118
25,472,529
3,114,201
1,782,743
2,244,299
102,250
562,210
19,472,642
3,767,613
1,703,668
1,526,605
867,825
705,481
Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
49,619,994
45,673,715
Property and equipment
Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Maintenance equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Computer equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Leasehold improvement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Office furniture and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Automobiles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less accumulated depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
936,026
4,248,439
8,305,850
3,068,854
2,858,967
158,042
936,026
3,819,469
6,687,155
963,211
1,516,376
132,926
19,576,178
(10,893,120)
14,055,163
(9,039,396)
Property and equipment, net
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financing receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8,683,058
4,432,277
5,015,767
3,761,239
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 62,735,329
$54,450,721
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued vacation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other accrued liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 2,617,377
4,469,507
2,951,841
4,446,727
$ 2,212,085
3,582,870
2,606,043
2,846,349
Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
14,485,452
11,247,347
Deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,785,854
512,103
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 30,000,000 shares authorized;
10,962,874 and 10,972,757 shares issued and outstanding . . . . . . . . . .
Additional paid-in capital
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated other comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10,963
30,549,149
58,903
15,845,008
10,973
29,679,385
100,103
12,900,810
Total stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
46,464,023
42,691,271
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 62,735,329
$54,450,721
See accompanying notes.
45
COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND SYSTEMS, INC.
Statements of Income
Year ended December 31,
2010
2009
2008
Sales revenues:
System sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Support and maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Business management services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 61,252,949
59,259,133
32,735,162
$ 42,455,364
55,884,446
29,402,215
$ 41,581,002
53,324,398
24,758,690
Total sales revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
153,247,244
127,742,025
119,664,090
Costs of sales:
System sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Support and maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Business management services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
46,800,755
23,923,099
18,139,259
35,821,890
21,627,822
17,033,502
32,498,956
19,349,244
14,594,711
Total costs of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
88,863,113
74,483,214
66,442,911
Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
64,384,131
53,258,811
53,221,179
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
General and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
11,605,123
23,681,584
9,081,393
20,808,616
8,872,137
20,638,012
Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
35,286,707
29,890,009
29,510,149
Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
29,097,424
23,368,802
23,711,030
Other income:
Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
673,224
727,816
940,191
Income before taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
29,770,648
24,096,618
24,651,221
Income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
11,032,795
8,913,335
9,213,226
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 18,737,853
$ 15,183,283
$ 15,437,995
Net income per share—basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income per share—diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
1.71
1.71
$
$
1.39
1.39
$
$
1.42
1.42
Weighted average shares outstanding
Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10,962,874
10,962,874
10,953,747
10,955,167
10,849,060
10,867,669
See accompanying notes.
46
COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND SYSTEMS, INC.
Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
Balance at December 31, 2007 .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Issuance of common stock . . . . .
Unrealized gain on investments
held for sale, net of tax . . . . . .
Stock-based compensation . . . . .
Dividends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax benefit from
restricted stock dividends . . . .
Income tax benefit from stock
option exercises . . . . . . . . . . .
Common
Shares
Common
Stock
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income(Loss)
Retained
Earnings
Total
Stockholders'
Equity
10,807,444
—
86,307
$10,807
—
87
$24,658,818
—
1,152,207
$ 44,825
—
—
$ 13,663,920
15,437,995
—
$ 38,378,370
15,437,995
1,152,294
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
914,147
—
43,278
238,123
11,890
—
—
—
—
—
—
(15,616,927)
11,890
914,147
(15,616,927)
—
—
43,278
238,123
Balance at December 31, 2008 .
10,893,751
$10,894
$27,006,573
$ 56,715
$ 13,484,988
$ 40,559,170
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Issuance of common stock . . . . .
Unrealized gain on investments
held for sale, net of tax . . . . . .
Stock-based compensation . . . . .
Dividends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax benefit from
restricted stock dividends . . . .
Income tax benefit from stock
option exercises . . . . . . . . . . .
—
79,006
—
79
—
1,303,520
—
—
15,183,283
—
15,183,283
1,303,599
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
919,980
—
30,482
418,830
43,388
—
—
—
—
—
—
(15,767,461)
43,388
919,980
(15,767,461)
—
—
30,482
418,830
Balance at December 31, 2009 .
10,972,757
$10,973
$29,679,385
$100,103
$ 12,900,810
$ 42,691,271
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forefeiture of common stock . . .
Unrealized loss on investments
held for sale, net of tax . . . . . .
Stock-based compensation . . . . .
Dividends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax benefit from
restricted stock dividends . . . .
—
(9,883)
—
(10)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
10
—
855,819
—
13,935
—
—
18,737,853
—
18,737,853
—
(41,200)
—
—
—
—
—
(15,793,655)
(41,200)
855,819
(15,793,655)
—
13,935
Balance at December 31, 2010 .
10,962,874
$10,963
$30,549,149
$ 58,903
$ 15,845,008
$ 46,464,023
See accompanying notes
47
COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND SYSTEMS, INC.
Statements of Cash Flows
Operating Activities
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments to net income:
Provision for bad debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax benefit from stock option exercises . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax benefit from restricted stock dividends . . . . . . . .
Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financing receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income taxes payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Year ended December 31,
2010
2009
2008
$ 18,737,853
$ 15,183,283
$ 15,437,995
1,077,250
572,890
855,819
—
(13,935)
1,853,724
(6,843,741)
(251,022)
(508,044)
143,271
405,292
886,637
1,946,176
779,510
1,076,491
(166,942)
919,980
(418,830)
(30,482)
1,772,327
(4,948,268)
(2,192,199)
(1,475,326)
(204,216)
382,580
(145,487)
(841,270)
(99,360)
1,338,135
(61,894)
914,147
(238,123)
(43,278)
1,811,097
(2,605,066)
(1,279,227)
75,861
4,300
112,624
147,648
674,561
(579,739)
Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
19,641,680
8,812,281
15,709,041
Investing Activities
Purchases of property and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchases of investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sale of investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(5,092,047)
(216,837)
—
(829,103)
(2,826,331)
1,500,000
(1,115,102)
(472,258)
—
Net cash used in investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(5,308,884)
(2,155,434)
(1,587,360)
Financing Activities
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from exercise of stock options, net
Dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax benefit from stock option exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax benefit from restricted stock dividends . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
(15,793,655)
—
13,935
1,303,599
(15,767,461)
418,830
30,482
1,152,294
(15,616,927)
238,123
43,278
Net cash used in financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(15,779,720)
(14,014,550)
(14,183,232)
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(1,446,924)
(7,357,703)
(61,551)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4,386,763
11,744,466
11,806,017
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 2,939,839
$ 4,386,763
$ 11,744,466
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Cash paid for interest
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash paid for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reclassification of inventory to property and equipment . . . . . . . .
See accompanying notes.
48
— $
$
$ 9,513,193
428,970
$
— $
—
$ 8,759,003
$ 1,145,960
$ 9,647,407
—
$
COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2010
1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Computer Programs and Systems, Inc. (CPSI or the Company) is a healthcare information technology
solutions provider which was formed and commenced operations in 1979. The Company provides, on an
integrated basis, enterprise-wide clinical management, access management, patient financial management, health
information management, strategic decision support, resource planning management and enterprise application
integration solutions to healthcare organizations throughout the United States. Additionally, CPSI provides other
information technology solutions, including business management services, remote hosting, networking
technologies and other related services. The Company operates in a single segment reporting to the chief
executive officer, based on the criteria of FASB Codification topic, Segment Reporting.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents can include time deposits and certificates of deposit with original maturities of
three months or less that are highly-liquid and readily convertible to a known amount of cash. These investments
are stated at cost, which approximates market, due to their short duration or liquid nature.
Investments
The Company accounts for investments in accordance with FASB Codification topic, Investments – Debt
and Equity Securities. Accordingly, investments are classified as available-for-sale securities and are reported at
fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported in a separate component of
stockholders’ equity. The Company’s management determines the appropriate classifications of investments in
fixed maturity securities at the time of acquisition and re-evaluates the classifications at each balance sheet date.
The Company’s investments in fixed maturity securities are classified as available-for-sale.
Investments are comprised of the following at December 31, 2010:
Short term investments (cash and accrued
income) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Obligations of U.S. Treasury, U.S. . . . . . . . .
government corporations and agencies . . . . .
Mortgaged-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortized
Cost
Unrealized
Gains
Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value
$
521,346
$
10
$ — $
521,356
5,212,786
119,996
7,451,233
13,819
1,575
89,665
1,066
—
7,441
5,225,539
121,571
7,533,457
$13,305,361
$105,069
$8,507
$13,401,923
Shown below are the amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities with fixed maturities at
December 31, 2010, by contract maturity date. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because
issuers of certain securities retain early call or prepayment rights.
Due in 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Due in 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Due in 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Due thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortized
Cost
$ 5,055,388
6,386,694
1,743,283
119,996
Fair Value
$ 5,083,595
6,459,140
1,737,617
121,571
$13,305,361
$13,401,923
49
Investments are comprised of the following at December 31, 2009:
Short term investments (cash and accrued
income) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Obligations of U.S. Treasury, U.S. . . . . . . . .
government corporations and agencies . . . . .
Mortgaged-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortized
Cost
Unrealized
Gains
Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value
$
311,895
$
— $ — $
311,895
4,648,496
153,083
7,965,541
15,047
737
149,430
847
—
264
4,662,696
153,820
8,114,707
$13,079,015
$165,214
$1,111
$13,243,118
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with FASB Codification topic – Income Taxes. Under this topic,
deferred income taxes are determined utilizing the asset and liability approach. This method gives consideration
to the future tax consequences associated with differences between financial accounting and tax bases of assets
and liabilities. The effect on the deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income
in the period that includes the enactment date. We recognize interest and penalties accrued related to
unrecognized tax benefits in the statements of income under general and administrative expenses.
We also make a provision for uncertain income tax positions in accordance with the Income Taxes
Codification topic. These provisions require that a tax position taken in a tax return be recognized in the financial
statements when it is more likely than not (i.e. a likelihood of more than fifty percent) that the position would be
sustained upon examination by tax authorities. A recognized tax position is then measured at the largest amount
of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon settlement. The topic also requires that
changes in judgement that result in subsequent recognition, derecognition, or change in a measurement date of a
tax position taken in a prior annual period (including any related interest and penalties) be recognized as a
discrete item in the interim period in which the change occurs.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Trade accounts receivable are stated at the amount the Company expects to collect and do not bear interest.
The collectibility of trade receivable balances is regularly evaluated based on a combination of factors such as
customer credit-worthiness, past transaction history with the customer, current economic industry trends and
changes in customer payment patterns. If it is determined that a customer will be unable to fully meet its financial
obligation, such as in the case of a bankruptcy filing or other material events impacting its business, a specific
reserve for bad debt is recorded to reduce the related receivable to the amount expected to be recovered.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at cost using the average cost method. The Company’s inventories are composed of
computer equipment, forms and supplies. For cash flow presentation, inventory used by the Company and
capitalized as property and equipment is shown as a change in inventory beginning in 2009.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment is recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Additions and improvements to
property and equipment that materially increase productive capacity or extend the life of an asset are capitalized.
Maintenance, repairs and minor renewals are expensed as incurred. Upon retirement or other disposition of such
assets, the related costs and accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective accounts and any
resulting gain or loss is included in the results of operations.
50
Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method over the asset’s useful life, generally 5
years. The Company reviews for the possible impairment of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Depreciation expense is
reported on the income statement as a component of support and maintenance costs and operating expenses.
Deferred Revenue
Deferred revenue represents amounts received from customers under licensing agreements and
implementation fees for which the revenue earnings process has not been completed.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America, principally those required by the Software topic and Revenue Recognition subtopic of the
Codification and those prescribed by the SEC.
The Company’s revenue is generated from three sources:
•
•
•
the sale of information systems, which includes software, conversion and installation services,
hardware, peripherals, forms and supplies.
the provision of system support services, which includes software application support, hardware
maintenance, continuing education, Software as a Service provider (“SaaS”) products, internet service
provider (“ISP”) products, and information technology management and professional services.
the provision of business management services, which includes electronic billing, statement processing,
payroll processing and accounts receivable management.
The Company enters into contractual obligations to sell hardware, perpetual software licenses, installation
and training services, and maintenance services. Revenue from hardware sales is recognized upon shipment,
when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable, and
collection is probable. Revenue from the perpetual software licenses and installation and training services are
recognized using the residual method. The residual method allocates an amount of the arrangement to the
elements for which fair value can be determined and any remaining arrangement consideration (the “residual
revenue”) is then allocated to the delivered elements. The fair value of maintenance services is determined based
on vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of fair value and is deferred and recognized as revenue ratably
over the maintenance term. VSOE of fair value of maintenance services is determined by reference to the price
the Company’s customers are required to pay for the services when sold separately via renewals. The residual
revenue is allocated to the perpetual license and installation and training services and is recognized over the term
that the installation and training services are performed for the entire arrangement. The method of recognizing
revenue for the perpetual license for the associated modules included in the arrangement and related installation
and training services over the term the services are performed is on a module by module basis as the respective
installation and training for each specific module is completed as this is representative of the pattern of provision
of these services. The installation and training services are normally completed in three to four weeks.
Revenue derived from maintenance contracts primarily includes revenue from software application support,
hardware maintenance, continuing education and related services. Maintenance contracts are typically sold for a
separate fee with initial contract periods ranging from one to seven years, with renewal for additional periods
thereafter. Maintenance revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the maintenance agreement.
The Company accounts for SaaS contracts in accordance with the requirements of the Hosting Arrangement
section under the Software topic and Revenue Recognition subtopic of the FASB Codification. The Codification
states that the software element of SaaS services should not be accounted for as a hosting arrangement “if the
customer has the contractual right to take possession of the software at any time during the hosting period
without significant penalty and it is feasible for the customer to either run the software on its own hardware or
51
contract with another party unrelated to the vendor to host the software.” Each SaaS contract includes a system
purchase and buyout clause, and this clause specifies the total amount of the system buyout. In addition, a clause
is included which states that should the system be bought out by the customer, the customer would be required to
enter into a general support agreement (for post-contract support services) for the remainder of the original SaaS
term. Accordingly, the Company has concluded that SaaS customers do not have the right to take possession of
the system without significant penalty (i.e. the purchase price of the system), and thus SaaS revenue of CPSI falls
within the scope of the Hosting Arrangement section of the Codification. In accordance with SEC regulations,
revenue is recognized when the services are performed.
Revenue for ISP, business management, and information technology management and professional services
are recognized in the period in which the services are performed.
The Company collects various taxes from customers and remits these amounts to applicable taxing
authorities. The Company’s accounting policy is to exclude these taxes from revenues and cost of sales.
Stock Based Compensation
The Company accounts for stock based compensation according to the provisions of FASB Codification
topic, Compensation – Stock Compensation, which establishes accounting for stock-based awards exchanged for
employee services. Accordingly, stock-based compensation cost is measured at grant date based on the fair value
of the award, and is recognized as an expense on a straight-line basis over the employee’s requisite service
period.
Research and Development Costs
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Research and development costs totaled
approximately $2,328,000, $2,472,000 and $1,833,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. Research and development expense is included in cost of support and maintenance in the
accompanying statements of income.
Advertising
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising expense was approximately $57,000, $15,000 and
$70,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and are recorded in sales and
marketing expenses in the accompanying statements of income.
Shipping and Handling Costs
Shipping and handling costs are expensed as incurred and included in general and administrative expenses.
Shipping and handling costs totaled approximately $1,042,000, $898,000 and $1,208,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America requires that management make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
52
Accounting Standards Adopted by CPSI in 2010
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2010-06, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosure. This update provides amendments to FASB Codification topic, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures, that require new disclosures about transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2, the
reasons for the transfers as well as a reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable
inputs (Level 3), and requires quantitative disclosures about the fair value measurements separately for each class
of assets and liabilities. The update is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2009. Adoption of this update did not have a material impact on our financial statements.
In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing
Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses. This update requires improved disclosures about the credit
quality of financing receivables and credit reserves held against them. The update is effective for periods ending
on or after December 15, 2010. This update did not have a material impact on our financial statements but did
require additional disclosures. See Note 8 to the financial statements for additional detail.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-14, Software: Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include
Software Elements. This update addresses revenue recognition in situations where products or services are sold
along with incidental software components. The update is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements
entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The Company does not
anticipate that the adoption of ASU 2009-14 will have a material impact on its financial statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-13, Revenue Recognition: Multiple-Deliverable Revenue
Arrangements. This update addresses the criteria for separating consideration in multiple-element arrangements.
It will require companies allocating the overall consideration to each deliverable to use an estimated selling price
of individual deliverables in the arrangement in the absence of vendor-specific objective evidence or other third-
party evidence of the selling price. The update is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or
materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The Company does not anticipate that the
adoption of ASU 2009-13 will have a material impact on its financial statements.
3. DETAILS OF BALANCE SHEET AMOUNTS
Other accrued liabilities are comprised of the following at December 31, 2010 and 2009:
Salaries and benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Self-insurance reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrecognized tax benefit
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$2,380,523
630,143
585,600
697,723
152,738
$1,378,473
182,525
510,900
536,717
237,734
2010
2009
$4,446,727
$2,846,349
4. NET INCOME PER SHARE
The Company presents both basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) amounts. Basic EPS is calculated
by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period
presented. Diluted EPS amounts are based upon the weighted average number of common and common
equivalent shares outstanding during the period presented. The difference between basic and diluted EPS is
solely attributable to stock options. The Company uses the treasury stock method to calculate the impact of
outstanding stock options. For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 these dilutive shares on a
weighted average basis were 0, 1,420 and 18,609, respectively.
53
5. INCOME TAXES
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with the FASB’s Codification topic, Income Taxes.
These provisions require a company to determine whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be
sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of the position. If the more-likely-than-not threshold is
met, a company must measure the tax position to determine the amount to recognize in the financial statements.
We applied these provisions to all tax positions for which the statute of limitations remained open. A
reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
Beginning balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additions for tax positions of prior years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reductions for tax positions of prior years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$537,000
108,000
53,000
—
$207,000
55,000
275,000
—
Ending balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$698,000
$537,000
2010
2009
The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits, if recognized, that would affect the effective tax rate is
$698,000.
The Company classifies interest and penalties arising from the underpayment of income taxes in the
statements of income under general and administrative expenses. As of December 31, 2010, we had no accrued
interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions as amounts are considered immaterial. The tax years
2004 – 2009 remain open to federal examination and to other taxing jurisdictions to which we are subject. The
federal returns for the tax years 2004, 2005, and 2006 are currently under examination by the Internal Revenue
Service, primarily in relation to research credits claimed on those returns by the Company.
It is reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits, inclusive of related interest, will
change in the next twelve months. At December 31, 2010, there is no estimated increase or decrease in the
amount of unrecognized tax benefits.
Deferred income taxes arise from the temporary differences in the recognition of income and expenses for
tax purposes. A valuation allowance is established when the Company believes that it is more likely than not that
some portion of its deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are comprised of the
following at December 31, 2010 and 2009:
2010
2009
Deferred tax assets:
Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued vacation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 468,806
1,151,218
368,015
325,122
$ 296,194
1,027,065
390,847
325,153
Total deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$2,313,161
$2,039,259
Deferred tax liabilities:
Other comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
47,168
1,807,548
$
64,001
960,756
Total deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$1,854,716
$1,024,757
54
Significant components of the income tax provision for the year ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
are as follows:
Current provision:
2010
2009
2008
Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 8,478,494
1,981,411
$7,280,943
1,799,334
$7,512,603
1,762,517
Deferred provision:
Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
514,132
58,758
(149,820)
(17,122)
(50,132)
(11,762)
Total income tax provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$11,032,795
$8,913,335
$9,213,226
The difference between income taxes at the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate of 35% and those reported
in the statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
Income taxes at U.S. Federal statutory rate . . . . . . . . . . . .
State income tax, net of federal tax effect . . . . . . . . .
Impact of tax credits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$10,419,727
1,346,675
(590,928)
(142,679)
$8,433,816
1,152,445
(583,010)
(89,916)
$8,627,927
1,148,528
(454,219)
(109,010)
2010
2009
2008
$11,032,795
$8,913,335
$9,213,226
6. STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB Codification topic,
Compensation – Stock Compensation, which establishes accounting for stock-based awards exchanged for
employee services. Accordingly, stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair
value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the employee’s requisite service period. The Company
recorded compensation costs as the requisite service was rendered for the unvested portion of previously issued
awards that remained outstanding at the initial date of adoption and any awards issued, modified, repurchased or
cancelled after January 1, 2006.
The following table shows total stock-based compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2010,
2009 and 2008, included in the Statements of Income:
2010
2009
2008
Costs of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pre-tax stock-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: income tax effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$299,988
$555,831
$855,819
$333,770
$299,988
$619,992
919,980
$358,792
Net stock-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$522,049
561,188
$299,988
614,159
914,147
356,517
557,630
Basic and diluted per share impact . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
0.05
$
0.05
$
0.05
Cash flows resulting from excess tax benefits are required to be classified as a part of cash flows from
financing activities. Excess tax benefits are realized tax benefits from tax deductions for exercised options in
excess of the deferred tax asset attributable to stock compensation costs for such options. As a result, $0,
$418,830 and $238,123 of excess tax benefits for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, have been classified as a financing cash inflow. In addition to stock option exercises, the Company
also pays dividends on restricted stock which resulted in excess tax benefits of $13,935, $30,482 and $43,278 for
the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, which are classified as cash flows from
financing activities.
55
2002 Stock Option Plan
Under the 2002 Stock Option Plan, the Company has authorized the issuance of equity-based awards for up
to 865,333 shares of common stock to provide additional incentive to employees and officers. Pursuant to the
plan, the Company can grant either incentive or non-qualified stock options. Options to purchase common stock
under the 2002 Stock Option Plan had been granted to Company employees with an exercise price equal to the
fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of grant.
Stock options granted under the 2002 Stock Option Plan to executive officers of the Company became
vested as to all of the shares covered by such grant on the fifth anniversary of the grant date and expire on the
seventh anniversary of the grant date. Stock options granted under the 2002 Stock Option Plan to employees
other than executive officers became vested as to 50% of the shares covered by the option grant on the third
anniversary of the grant date and as to 100% of such shares on the fifth anniversary of the grant date. In addition,
options became vested upon termination of employment resulting from death, disability or retirement. Such
options expired on the seventh anniversary of the grant date.
Under the methodology of the Codification, the fair value of the Company’s stock options was estimated at
the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The multiple option approach was used, with
assumptions for expected option life of 5 years and 44% expected volatility for the market price of the
Company’s stock in 2002. An estimated dividend yield of 3% was used. The risk-free rate of return was
determined to be 2.79% in 2002. No options were granted in 2010, 2009 or 2008. There were no outstanding
options as of December 31, 2009 or December 31, 2010.
A summary of stock option activity under the 2002 Stock Option Plan is as follows:
2010
2009
2008
Shares
Exercise
Price
Shares
Exercise
Price
Outstanding at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . — $
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —
Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —
Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —
$
— 82,608
—
—
— (79,006)
— (3,602)
16.50
—
16.50
16.50
Shares
152,444
—
(69,836)
—
Outstanding at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — $
Exercisable at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — $
—
—
— $ —
82,608
— $ —
82,608
Exercise
Price
$
$
$
16.50
—
16.50
16.50
16.50
16.50
Shares available for future grants under the plan
as end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
495,134
495,134
495,134
The aggregate intrinsic value (as measured by the difference between the exercise and strike price) of
options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $0, $1,145,689 and $728,695,
respectively.
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, there was no unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested
share-based compensation arrangements granted under the 2002 Stock Option Plan.
2005 Restricted Stock Plan
On January 27, 2006, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved the grant of
116,498 shares of restricted stock, effective January 30, 2006, to certain executive officers of the Company. The
grant date fair value was $42.91 per share. The restricted stock vests in five equal annual installments
commencing on the first anniversary of the date of grant.
56
On May 17, 2006, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved the grant of
17,810 shares of restricted stock, effective May 17, 2006, to the Chief Operating Officer of the Company. The
grant date fair value was $42.11 per share. The restricted stock vests in five equal annual installments
commencing January 30, 2007, and each January 30 thereafter.
On October 31, 2007, the Company’s then current Chief Financial Officer resigned his position. Upon
resignation, 9,320 shares of unvested restricted stock which had been granted to him under the 2005 Restricted
Stock Plan were forfeited. The forfeiture of these shares resulted in the reversal of previously recognized stock
compensation expense of $91,663.
On January 23, 2008, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved the grant of 16,471
shares of restricted stock to the Company’s Vice President – Finance and Chief Financial Officer. The grant date
fair value was $21.25 per share. The restricted stock was scheduled to vest in five equal annual installments
commencing January 30, 2009, and each January 30 thereafter. On June 30, 2010, 9,883 shares of unvested
restricted stock were forfeited, cancelled and returned to the authorized and unissued shares of the Company as a
result of the termination of employment of this individual on such date.
A summary of activity under the 2005 Restricted Stock Plan during the years ended December 31, 2010,
2009 and 2008 is as follows:
Nonvested stock outstanding at January 1, 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Shares
79,487
16,471
19,872
—
Nonvested stock outstanding at December 31, 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
76,086
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
23,166
—
Weighted-Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
$42.77
21.25
42.76
—
$38.10
—
39.71
—
Nonvested stock outstanding at December 31, 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
52,920
$37.41
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
23,166
9,883
—
39.71
21.25
Nonvested stock outstanding at December 31, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
19,871
$42.77
As of December 31, 2010, there was $70,832 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested
share-based compensation arrangements granted under the 2005 Restricted Stock Plan. As of December 31,
2010, this cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 0.1 years.
7. CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK
Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk, consist
principally of temporary cash investments and trade receivables. The Company places its temporary cash
investments with credit-worthy, high-quality financial institutions.
57
The Company’s customer base is concentrated in the healthcare industry. Customers are located throughout
the United States. The Company requires no collateral or other security to support customer accounts receivable.
An allowance for doubtful accounts has been established for potential credit losses based on historical collection
experience.
The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents in bank deposit accounts, which, at times, may exceed
federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and does not believe it is
exposed to any significant credit risk on cash and cash equivalents.
8. FINANCING RECEIVABLES
The Company leases its information and patient care systems to certain healthcare providers under sales-
type leases expiring in various years through 2016. These receivables typically have terms from two to five
years, bear interest at various rates, and are usually collateralized by a security interest in the underlying assets.
Since the Company has a history of successfully collecting amounts due under the original payment terms of
these extended payment arrangements without making any concessions to its customers, the Company satisfies
the requirement for revenue recognition. The Company’s history with these types of extended payment term
arrangements supports management’s assertion that revenues are fixed and determinable and probable of
collection.
The components of these lease receivables were as follows on December 31:
Total minimum lease payments receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less allowance for losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less unearned income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 7,504,094
(233,396)
(796,610)
$ 6,155,967
—
(595,914)
Lease receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less current portion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6,474,088
(2,041,811)
5,560,053
(1,798,814)
Amounts due after one year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 4,432,277
$ 3,761,239
2010
2009
Future minimum lease payments to be received subsequent to December 31, 2010 are as follows:
2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thereafter
$2,689,070
2,045,129
1,374,674
710,091
447,472
237,658
Total minimum lease payments to be received . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less unearned income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7,504,094
(796,610)
Net leases receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$6,707,484
Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and Allowance for Credit Losses
The following table is a rollforward of the allowance for financing credit losses for the years ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009:
December 31, 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
December 31, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$— $ —
$— $233,396
$—
$—
$—
$—
Beginning
Balance
Provision
Charge-offs Recoveries
Ending
Balance
$ —
$233,396
58
The Company established an allowance for financing receivable credit losses during 2010 upon adoption of
ASU 2010-20. This allowance is based on the historical level of customer defaults under such arrangements. The
Company has been successful collecting its financing receivables and considers the credit quality of such
arrangements to be good, especially as the underlying assets act as collateral for the receivable.
The Company has also sold information and patient care systems to certain healthcare providers under
extended payment terms. These receivables, included in current portion of financing receivables, typically have
terms from 3 to 12 months. Total amounts receivable under these arrangements at December 31, 2010 and 2009
were $1,072,390 and $1,968,799, respectively.
9. BENEFIT PLANS
In January 1994, the Company adopted the Computer Programs & System, Inc. 401(k) Retirement Plan that
covers all eligible employees of the Company who have completed one year of service. The plan allows eligible
employees to contribute up to 15% of their pre-tax earnings up to the statutory limit prescribed by the Internal
Revenue Service. The Company matches the first $1,000 contribution per participant plus a discretionary amount
determined by the Company. The Company contributed approximately $1,256,000, $1,222,000 and $1,151,000
to the plan for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The Company provides certain health and medical benefits to eligible employees, their spouses and
dependents pursuant to a benefit plan funded by the Company. Each participating employee contributes to the
Company’s costs associated with such benefit plan. The Company’s obligation to fund this benefit plan and pay
for these benefits is limited through the Company’s purchase of an insurance policy from a third-party insurer.
The amount established as a reserve is intended to recognize the Company’s estimated obligations with respect to
its payment of claims and claims incurred but not yet reported under the benefit plan. Management believes that
the recorded liability for medical self-insurance at December 31, 2010 and 2009 is adequate to cover the losses
and claims incurred, but these reserves are based on estimates and the amount ultimately paid may be more or
less than such estimates.
10. OPERATING LEASES
The Company leases certain real property, most of which is owned by entities that are owned by one or
more stockholders of the Company. The lease agreements have terms of ten years and expire on or before
December 2015. For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 total rent expense paid to related parties
was approximately $1,697,478, $1,697,478 and $1,697,478, respectively.
The future minimum lease payments payable under operating leases subsequent to December 31, 2010 are
as follows:
2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$2,243,106
1,284,576
725,307
689,557
332,785
—
$5,275,331
59
11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
As of December 31, 2010, the Company is contingently liable as guarantor on a lease obligation between
Solis Healthcare, LP (“Solis Healthcare”), as lessee, and Winthrop Resources Corporation (“Winthrop”), as
lessor. Solis Healthcare purchased a software system from the Company and entered into a sale-leaseback
transaction with Winthrop in the first quarter of 2008. The Company provided this guarantee in order to facilitate
Solis Healthcare in leasing the new system. The lease has an initial term of five years and continues from
year-to-year thereafter until terminated. The Company is contingently liable as guarantor under the lease such
that, if at any time prior to the termination of the lease, Solis Healthcare (i) enters into bankruptcy or (ii) defaults
for more than 60 days in its payments or performance under the lease, the Company will be obligated to perform
under the guaranty by making the required lease payments, including late fees and penalties. The guarantee runs
for the entire term of the lease; however, the maximum potential amount of future payments that the Company
would be required to make to Winthrop under the guaranty is $1,400,040, the balance of the lease payments as of
December 31, 2010, plus any fees and costs that Winthrop incurs in collecting amounts due under the lease
(including attorney’s fees and costs). The Company recorded $2,154,389, the amount billed for the new system
installation less the fair value of the guaranty, as revenue during the first quarter of 2008. Due to the contingent
nature of the guaranty, the maximum amount of the guaranty is not recorded on the balance sheet; however,
when necessary, reserves are recorded to cover potential losses. A liability in the amount of $55,625, the
amortized fair value of the guaranty, is recorded on the balance sheet as an other accrued liability at
December 31, 2010. As of March 4, 2011, we were not aware of any conditions that would effect the payment or
performance risk of the lease obligation.
From time to time, the Company is involved in routine litigation that arises in the ordinary course of
business. Management does not expect this to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial
statements.
12. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FASB Codification topic – Comprehensive Income, requires the disclosure of certain revenue, expenses,
gains and losses that are excluded from net income in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America. Total comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and
2008 is as follows:
Net income as reported . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments, net of
Year ended December 31,
2010
2009
2008
$18,737,853
$15,183,283
$15,437,995
taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(41,200)
43,388
11,890
Total comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$18,696,653
$15,226,671
$15,449,885
13. FAIR VALUE
The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Codification topic, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures, on January 1, 2008. These provisions establish a framework for measuring fair value and expands
financial statement disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions do not require any new fair value
measurements, but rather apply to all other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value
measurements. The provisions require that assets and liabilities carried at fair value be classified and disclosed in
one of the following three categories:
Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.
60
The fair values of the Company’s available-for-sale securities were based on matrix pricing for the period
ended December 31, 2010, which basically treats all fixed income securities that derive price from yield and
other market factors as Level 2. The fair values of the Company’s available-for-sale securities for the period
ended December 31, 2009 were based on actual trade data where available and were split between Level 1 and
Level 2 based on trade frequency. As such, the changes in assets between Level 1 and Level 2 between
December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2010 are the result of the change in fair value determination techniques
and not a result of a change in investments or investment quality. We generally apply fair value techniques on a
non-recurring basis associated with (1) valuing potential impairment loss related to financing receivables
accounted for pursuant to Codification topic, Leases, and (2) valuing potential impairment loss related to long-
lived assets accounted for pursuant to Codification topic, Property, Plant and Equipment, when events or
circumstances indicate as possible impairment.
The following table summarizes the carrying amounts and fair values of certain assets and liabilities at
December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
Fair Value at December 31, 2010 Using
Carrying
Amount at
12/31/2010
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Description
Available-for-sale securities
Short-term investments (cash and accrued
income) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mortgage backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Obligations of U.S. Treasury, U.S.
government corporations and agencies . . .
Corporate bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
521,356
121,571
$
5,225,539
7,533,457
—
—
—
—
$
521,356
121,571
5,225,539
7,533,457
Total available-for-sale securities . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$13,401,923
$
— $13,401,923
$—
—
—
—
$—
Fair Value at December 31, 2009 Using
Carrying
Amount at
12/31/2009
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Description
Available-for-sale securities
Short-term investments (cash and accrued
income) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mortgage backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Obligations of U.S. Treasury, U.S.
government corporations and agencies . . .
Corporate bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
311,895
153,820
$ 160,105
—
$
151,790
153,820
4,662,696
8,114,707
612,537
7,463,276
4,050,159
651,431
Total available-for-sale securities . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$13,243,118
$8,235,918
$ 5,007,200
$—
—
—
—
$—
61
14. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On January 27, 2011, the Company announced a dividend for the first quarter of 2011 in the amount of
$0.36 per share.
15. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents a summary of our results of operations for our eight most recent quarters ended
December 31, 2010. The information for each of these quarters is unaudited and has been prepared on a basis
consistent with the audited financial statements. This information includes all adjustments, consisting only of
normal recurring adjustments, we consider necessary for fair presentation of this information when read in
conjunction with the audited financial statements and related notes. Our operating results have varied on a
quarterly basis and may fluctuate significantly in the future.
Year Ended December 31, 2010
$
Sales revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted average shares outstanding
1st Quarter
2nd Quarter
3rd Quarter
4th Quarter
(In thousands except for share and per share data)
$
31,541
12,109
4,399
2,920
0.27
0.27
$
37,713
15,685
6,814
4,264
0.39
0.39
$
40,913
17,057
7,678
4,888
0.45
0.45
43,079
19,533
10,206
6,665
0.61
0.61
Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10,972,757
10,972,757
10,962,874
10,962,874
10,962,874
10,962,874
10,962,874
10,962,874
Year Ended December 31, 2009
Sales revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income per share
$
Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted average shares outstanding
$
30,136
13,506
6,288
4,025
0.37
0.37
$
30,847
12,627
5,335
3,541
0.32
0.32
$
33,008
13,613
6,105
4,021
0.37
0.37
33,751
13,512
5,640
3,596
0.33
0.33
Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10,906,147
10,911,905
10,962,386
10,962,386
10,972,757
10,972,757
10,972,757
10,972,757
62
SCHEDULE II
COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND SYSTEMS, INC.
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
Balance at
beginning
of period
(1) Additions
charged to cost
and expenses
(2)
Deductions
Balance at end
of period
Description
2010
Allowance for losses on:
Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financing receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$759,000
—
$ 849,000
233,000
$ 639,000
—
$ 969,000
233,000
$759,000
$1,082,000
$ 639,000
$1,202,000
2009
Allowance for losses on:
Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financing receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$628,000
—
$1,076,000
$ 945,000
$ 759,000
—
—
—
$628,000
$1,076,000
$ 945,000
$ 759,000
2008
Allowance for losses on:
Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financing receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$949,000
—
$1,338,000
$1,659,000
$ 628,000
—
—
—
$949,000
$1,338,000
$1,659,000
$ 628,000
(1) Adjustments to allowance for change in estimates.
(2) Uncollectible accounts written off, net of recoveries.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the
information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to
our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Because of the inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any
system of disclosure controls and procedures, no evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures can provide
absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, with a company have been prevented or
detected on a timely basis. Even disclosure controls and procedures determined to be effective can only provide
reasonable assurance that their objectives are achieved.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and
with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of
the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rule 13a-15(e)) pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective
at the reasonable assurance level.
63
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange
Act Rule 13a-15(f)) during the quarter ended December 31, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
This report is included in Item 8 on page 42 and is incorporated herein by reference.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
This report is included in Item 8 on page 44 and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.
None.
64
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to all of our directors, officers
(including our Chief Executive Officer and senior financial officers) and employees. We have also adopted a
separate code of ethics with additional guidelines and responsibilities applicable to our Chief Executive Officer
and senior financial officers, known as the Code of Ethics for CEO and Senior Financial Officers. Copies of the
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and the Code of Ethics for CEO and Senior Financial Officers are available
on CPSI’s website at www.cpsinet.com in the “Investors” section under “Corporate Governance.”
Other information required by this Item regarding executive officers is included in Part I of this Form 10-K
under the caption “Executive Officers” in accordance with Instruction 3 of the Instructions to Paragraph (b) of
Item 401 of Regulation S-K.
Other information required by this Item is incorporated by reference pursuant to General Instruction G(3) of
Form 10-K from CPSI’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference pursuant to General Instruction G(3) of
Form 10-K from CPSI’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Certain of the information required by this Item is incorporated by reference pursuant to General Instruction
G(3) of Form 10-K from CPSI’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table summarizes the securities that have been authorized for issuance as of December 31,
2010 under our 2002 Stock Option Plan and 2005 Restricted Stock Plan. Both of these plans have been approved
by CPSI’s stockholders. The plans are described in Note 6 of the Notes to the Financial Statements.
Plan Category
Equity compensation plans approved by
stockholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity compensation plans not approved by
stockholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity Compensation Plan Information
Number of securities
to be issued
upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
(a)
-0-
-0-
-0-
(b)
—
(c)
686,857(1)
-0-
686,857(1)
(1) Represents 495,134 shares of common stock underlying stock options that are issuable pursuant to our 2002
Stock Option Plan and 191,723 shares of common stock issuable pursuant to our 2005 Restricted Stock
Plan.
65
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference pursuant to General Instruction G(3) of
Form 10-K from CPSI’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference pursuant to General Instruction G(3) of
Form 10-K from CPSI’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A.
66
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)(1) and (2) and (c) – Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules.
Financial Statements: The Financial Statements and related Financial Statements Schedule of CPSI
are included herein in Part II, Item 8.
(a)(3) and (b) – Exhibits.
The exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index at page 69 of this Form 10-K are filed herewith or are
incorporated herein by reference.
67
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on this the
7th day of March, 2011.
COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND SYSTEMS, INC.
By: /s/ J. Boyd Douglas
J. Boyd Douglas
President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by
the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Name
Title
Date
/s/ David A. Dye
David A. Dye
/s/ J. Boyd Douglas
J. Boyd Douglas
/s/ James B. Britain
James B. Britain
/s/ Ernest F. Ladd, III
Ernest F. Ladd, III
Chairman of the Board and
Director, Vice President – Finance
and Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)
President, Chief Executive Officer
and Director (principal executive
officer)
March 7, 2011
March 7, 2011
Controller (principal accounting
officer)
March 7, 2011
Director
March 7, 2011
/s/ W. Austin Mulherin, III
Director
March 7, 2011
W. Austin Mulherin, III
/s/ William R. Seifert, II
Director
March 7, 2011
William R. Seifert, II
/s/ John C. Johnson
John C. Johnson
/s/ Charles P. Huffman
Charles P. Huffman
Director
Director
68
March 7, 2011
March 7, 2011
Exhibit
Number
Description
Exhibit Index
3.1
3.2
10.1*
10.2*
10.3*
10.4*
10.5*
10.6*
10.7
10.8
10.9
10.10
10.11
10.12
10.13
10.14
Certificate of Incorporation (filed as Exhibit 3.4 to CPSI’s Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-84726) and incorporated herein by reference)
Bylaws (filed as Exhibit 3.6 to CPSI’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-
84726) and incorporated herein by reference)
2002 Stock Option Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to CPSI’s Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-84726) and incorporated herein by reference)
First Amendment to 2002 Stock Option Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to CPSI’s Current Report on
Form 8-K dated May, 12, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference)
Second Amendment to 2002 Stock Option Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to CPSI’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference)
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for executive officers (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to
CPSI’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-84726) and incorporated herein by
reference)
Amendment and Restatement of 2005 Restricted Stock Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to CPSI’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference)
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the 2005 Restricted Stock Plan (filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to CPSI’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 30, 2006, and incorporated herein
by reference)
Form of Indemnity Agreement entered into by CPSI and each of its non-employee directors (filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to CPSI’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 and
incorporated herein by reference)
Real Property Lease, dated April 1, 2002, between CPSI and C.P. Investments, Inc. (filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to CPSI’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-84726) and
incorporated herein by reference)
Real Property Lease dated April 1, 2002, between CPSI and DJK, LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to
CPSI’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-84726) and incorporated herein by
reference) (This lease was assumed by C. P. Investments, Inc. in 2005)
Real Property Lease, dated October 1, 2002, between CPSI and C.P. Investments, Inc. (filed as
Exhibit 10.10 to CPSI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 and
incorporated herein by reference)
Real Property Lease, dated November 1, 2002, between CPSI and C.P. Investments, Inc. (filed as
Exhibit 10.11 to CPSI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 and
incorporated herein by reference)
Real Property Lease, dated June 16, 2002, between CPSI and C.P. Investments, Inc. (filed as
Exhibit 10.12 to CPSI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 and
incorporated herein by reference)
Real Property Lease, dated March 15, 2005, between CPSI and C.P. Investments, Inc. (filed as
Exhibit 10.12 to CPSI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 and
incorporated herein by reference)
Real Property Lease, dated November 15, 2005, between CPSI and C.P. Investments, Inc. (filed as
Exhibit 10.13 to CPSI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 and
incorporated herein by reference)
69
Exhibit
Number
10.15
Description
Real Property Lease, dated December 15, 2005, between CPSI and C.P. Investments, Inc. (filed as
Exhibit 10.14 to CPSI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 and
incorporated herein by reference)
10.16*
Summary of Compensation Arrangements with Named Executive Officers and Directors
10.17
10.18
23.1
31.1
31.2
32.1
Real Property Lease Agreement, dated September 14, 2009 between CPSI and 3725 Airport
Boulevard, LP (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to CPSI’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference)
First Amendment to Real Property Lease Agreement, dated October 9, 2009, between CPSI and 3725
Airport Boulevard, LP(filed as Exhibit 10.2 to CPSI’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference)
Consent of Grant Thornton LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
*
Compensation plan or arrangement
70
CPSI
6600 Wall Street
Mobile, Alabama 36695