CytoDyn Inc
Annual Report 2012

Plain-text annual report

Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2012 or ¨ TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number 000-49908 CYTODYN INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Colorado (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) 110 Crenshaw Lake Road, Lutz, Florida (Address of principal executive offices) 75-3056237 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 33548 (Zip Code) Registrant’s Telephone Number, including area code: (813) 527-6969 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Title of class Common Stock, no par value Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ¨ Yes x No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. ¨ Yes x No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes ¨ No Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨ Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting company x Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule 12b-2 of the Act). ¨ Yes x No State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter: $29,890,680 (as of November 30, 2011). Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. As of July 31, 2012, the registrant had 29,211,509 shares of common stock outstanding. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Document Portions of Proxy Statement for the 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (“Proxy Statement”) Parts Into Which Incorporated Part III Table of Contents CYTODYN INC FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED MAY 31, 2012 Table of Contents PART I ITEM 1. BUSINESS ITEM 2. PROPERTIES ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY , RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES PART IV ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES 1 Page 2 2 13 13 14 14 14 16 17 24 61 61 62 62 62 62 62 63 63 63 63 Table of Contents THROUGHOUT THIS FILING, WE MAKE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. THE WORDS “ANTICIPATE,” “BELIEVE,” “EXPECT,” “INTEND,” “PREDICT,” “PLAN,” “SEEK,” “ESTIMATE,” “PROJECT,” “WILL,” “CONTINUE,” “COULD,” “MAY,” AND SIMILAR TERMS AND EXPRESSIONS ARE INTENDED TO IDENTIFY FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. THESE STATEMENTS INCLUDE, AMONG OTHERS, INFORMATION REGARDING FUTURE OPERATIONS, FUTURE CAPITAL EXPENDITURES, AND FUTURE NET CASH FLOWS. SUCH STATEMENTS REFLECT THE COMPANY’S CURRENT VIEWS WITH RESPECT TO FUTURE EVENTS AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE AND INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, GENERAL ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS CONDITIONS, CHANGES IN FOREIGN, POLITICAL, SOCIAL, AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS, REGULATORY INITIATIVES AND COMPLIANCE WITH GOVERNMENTAL REGULATIONS, THE ABILITY TO ACHIEVE MARKET PENETRATION AND ATTRACT CUSTOMERS, AND VARIOUS OTHER MATTERS, MANY OF WHICH ARE BEYOND THE COMPANY’S CONTROL. SHOULD ONE OR MORE OF THESE RISKS OR UNCERTAINTIES OCCUR, OR SHOULD UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS PROVE TO BE INCORRECT, ACTUAL RESULTS MAY VARY MATERIALLY AND ADVERSELY FROM THOSE ANTICIPATED, BELIEVED, ESTIMATED, OR OTHERWISE INDICATED. CONSEQUENTLY, ALL OF THE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS MADE IN THIS FILING ARE QUALIFIED BY THESE CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS AND THERE CAN BE NO ASSURANCE OF THE ACTUAL RESULTS OR DEVELOPMENTS. Item 1. Business. Overview / Corporate History PART I CytoDyn Inc. (the “Company”), is a Colorado corporation, with its principal business office at 110 Crenshaw Lake Road, Lutz, Florida 33548; telephone: (813) 527-6969, facsimile: (813) 527-6970, and website address: www.cytodyn.com. We are a development stage biotechnology company (concept company) focused on discovering and developing a class of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies to treat Human Immunodeficiency Virus (“HIV”) infection. In addition, we formed a wholly owned subsidiary, CytoDyn Veterinary Medicine LLC (“CVM”), which will explore the possible application of our existing proprietary monoclonal antibody technology to the treatment of Feline Immunodeficiency Virus, a retroviral infection in cats (“FIV”). In October 2003, the Company (under its previous name RexRay Corporation) entered into an Acquisition Agreement with CytoDyn of New Mexico, Inc. Pursuant to the acquisition agreement, we acquired assets related to our leading drug candidate, Cytolin , including the assignment of the patent license agreement dated July 1, 1994 between CytoDyn of New Mexico, Inc. and Allen D. Allen covering three United States patents along with foreign counterpart patents which describe a method for treating HIV disease with the use of monoclonal antibodies. This includes issued U.S. Patent Nos. 5,424,066; 5,651,970 and 6,534,057, as well as European Patent Nos. 0690725 and 1438970. In addition, Hong Kong Patent No. 1067958, ® 2 Table of Contents Australian Patent Nos. 684074 and 2003203742, Canadian Patent No. 2156495, Austrian Patent Nos. 408418, 267019, and 1438970, Belgian Patent No. 1438970, Swiss Patent Nos. 1438970 and 0690725, German Patent Nos. 69433789 and 69435142.3, Danish Patent No. 1438970, Spanish Patent Nos. 2219647, 2314341, 04101437.4, and 94912826.8, French Patent Nos. 1438970 and 0690725, Great Britain Patent Nos. 1438970 and 069725, Greece Patent No. 3067384, Iceland Patent No. 1438970, Italian Patent Nos. 1438970 and 0690725, Luxenbourg Patent No. 1438970, Monaco Patent No. 1438970, Netherlands Patent Nos. 1438970 and 0690725, Portuguese Patent Nos. 690725 and 1438970, and Swedish Patent Nos. 0410437.4 and 94912826.8 have been obtained as well. We also acquired the federally registered trademarks, CYTODYN (U.S. Registration No. 2095498) and CYTOLIN (U.S. Registration No. 2095497), and a related design mark (U.S. Registration No. 2662777. The license acquired gives the Company the worldwide, exclusive right to develop, market and sell compounds disclosed by the patent claims, practice methods taught by the patent claims, and exploit specified technology related to the patents. The term of the license agreement is for the life of the patents of which the first will expire in 2013. The original expiration dates on the issued U.S. Patent Nos. 5,424,066; 5,651,970 and 6,534,057 are 2013, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The original expiration dates for the foreign patents listed above are in 2013 or 2014, if the required annuity fee payments are paid by September 21, 2012. The Company’s Cytolin-related patents referenced above are for a murine (mouse) version of the drug. The Company’s research on Cytolin to date has utilized the current murine version of the drug. However, on September 23, 2011, the Company filed a provisional patent application (Serial No. 61/534,942) in the United States for its humanized version of Cytolin , a monoclonal antibody for the treatment of HIV Infection. ® ® The Company is also exploring other antibodies as potential therapeutics for FIV. On June 17, 2011, the Company filed a provisional patent application in the United States (Serial No. 61/498,029) for the use of these antibodies as well as selected small molecule antagonists and agonists for the treatment of FIV. On June 15, 2012, the Company filed an international patent application (Serial No. PCT/US2012/042693) claiming priority to this provisional patent application. On August 10, 2011, the Company filed an application for registration of the trademark CYTOFELINE, intended for use in conjunction with veterinary preparations for the treatment of FIV (U.S. App. Ser. No. 85393956). In February 2012, the Company filed foreign trademark applications claiming priority to the US application for CYTOFELINE, including Australian App. No. 1473043, Canadian App. No. 1563313, European CTM App. No. 010625192, Indian App. No. 2279431, Japan App. No. 2012-008009, Mexican App. No. 1247597, and a Chinese App. No. 10475960. Thus far, the Company has received a Certificate of Trademark Registration from Japan No. 5488875, with an effective registration date of April 20, 2012, and a Certificate of Trademark Registration from the European Union No. 010625192 with an effective registration date of June 11, 2012. Additionally, the Company’s Australian App. No. 1473043 was registered on May 31, 2012. Research History of Cytolin Compound Cytolin is part of a class of drugs called monoclonal antibodies. It targets a normal cell molecule called CD11a, part of the ® heterodimer that makes up the cell adhesion molecule lymphocyte function cell associated antigen (“LFA-1”). Published reports have suggested that blocking or engaging CD11a might somehow limit or prevent HIV infection of CD4 cells and monocytes. In 1993, six HIV- infected patients were treated with murine Cytolin . Blood and skin tests of these patients suggested that the antibody might be producing improvements in the ® 3 Table of Contents immune function of each patient. Based on the results of this pilot study, a compassionate use trial was initiated. In this study a relatively small number of physicians in the United States administered Cytolin to their HIV-infected patients over two years. As results from this initial use became available, other physicians obtained and administered Cytolin to their patients as well. Four of the doctors using Cytolin allowed the ® Company’s predecessor to send in an independent Institutional Review Board to inspect the medical records of approximately 200 patients treated with Cytolin once or twice a month over 18 months. Data were recorded and summarized and formed part of the material presented to the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (the “FDA”) as an early indication of the safety and potential efficacy of Cytolin . ® ® ® ® In 1996, the FDA approved a drug master file, designated BB-DMF#6836, for the manufacture of murine Cytolin at Vista ® Biologicals Corporation. CytoDyn of New Mexico, Inc. (a predecessor to the Company) and Vista Biologicals Corporation worked cooperatively to develop the drug master file. In accordance with the practice of the FDA, the drug master file was issued to and became the property of the entity with the capacity to manufacture the drug, in this case Vista Biologicals Corporation. By contract with Vista Biologicals Corporation, CytoDyn of New Mexico, Inc. had the exclusive right to reference the drug master file, that is, to authorize Vista Biologicals Corporation to manufacture Cytolin in accordance with the terms of the drug master file. ® In 1996, the FDA also designated our investigational new drug application for murine Cytolin as BB-IND #6845, and ® ® subsequently approved a clinical trial. In 2002, Symbion Research International, a contract research organization, completed a Phase I a/b clinical trial of Cytolin (a Phase I trial includes the initial introduction of an investigational new drug or biologic into humans). The trial was sponsored by Amerimmune, Inc., the previous licensee of CytoDyn of New Mexico, Inc. but Symbion was never paid for its work. As a result, its work product became Symbion’s. We entered into a buy-sell agreement with Symbion to purchase the Phase Ia study data in 2004. The Phase Ia study, conducted in 13 subjects suffering from HIV/Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (“AIDS”), found Cytolin to be safe and well tolerated. The initial safety study supported the safety and tolerability of the drug in these dose groups. Some of the data was presented as an abstract and poster session, entitled “Phase I Study of Anti-LFA-1 Monoclonal Antibody (Cytolin in Adults with HIV Infection)” at the 9th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections held in Seattle, Washington on February 24-28 2002 as well as the 16th International AIDS Conference held August 2006 in Toronto, Canada. The Company then went through a period of years where legal issues delayed the progress of this treatment. ® ® To date, only the murine version of Cytolin has been tested in clinical, research and development studies. The Company ® understands that registrational studies will require similar testing and confirmation of activity with its proprietary humanized version of Cytolin . ® Cytolin - Current Research Under a Clinical Trial Agreement dated September 28, 2009 and as amended to date (the “Clinical Trial Agreement”), in exchange ® for a research grant by the Company, Massachusetts General Hospital (“MGH”) in Boston, Massachusetts agreed to conduct an ex-vivo study of murine Cytolin in accordance with a study protocol entitled “An observational study to determine the in-vitro immunologic and virology activity of Cytolin” (the “Study”). In addition to providing financial support for the Study, the Company agreed to provide MGH with supplies of Cytolin needed for the Study. Under the Clinical Trial Agreement, Eric S. Rosenberg, M.D. is designated as the Principal Investigator for the Study. ® 4 Table of Contents Human subjects were recruited for the Study from Dr. Rosenberg’s clinic. The Study enrolled 10 adults with early HIV infection and 10 healthy adults as the control arm, all of whom were required to participate for six months. None of the patients enrolled in the study received injections of murine Cytolin ; rather they donated blood to allow one to examine the effects of Cytolin when it was added in the test tube to their peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The Study design and objectives are available to view at the government’s website at www.clinicaltrials.gov, ID NCT01048372. The public has online access to this federal database, which describes elements of clinical trials and their status. To review public records for the Study on the government’s website, enter “Cytolin” as the search term (case sensitive). ® ® The second amendment to the Clinical Trial Agreement provided that our research grant commitment for the Study would total $316,755. In March 2010, we agreed in a third amendment to the Clinical Trial Agreement to provide an additional $233,815 for the Study to enable the Principal Investigator to engage additional personnel. In December 2010, we further agreed in a fourth amendment to the Clinical Trial Agreement to provide an additional $25,000 for the Study. On May 20, 2011, we entered into a fifth amendment of the Clinical Trial Agreement with The General Hospital Corporation, d/b/a/ MGH to extend the Study enabling MGH Principal Investigator Eric Rosenberg, M.D., to further explore his initial findings regarding the potential mechanism of action of murine Cytolin to treat HIV-positive adults. Under the fifth amendment, we agreed to pay MGH the remaining unpaid balance of $291,590 of the total research grant of $865,375 over the six month period beginning on May 20, 2011 and ending on November 20, 2011. As of May 31, 2012, the final payment in the amount of approximately $72,898 due to MGH in connection with the Clinical Trial Agreement was past due. The Study was completed subsequent to May 31, 2012. The Company anticipates that if there is sufficient data to warrant publication Dr. Rosenberg will draft and submit a manuscript detailing his results. The release of this or any data from the Study is entirely dependent on Dr. Rosenberg. ® The Study was a science-intensive research study and was not intended to function as a registrational study (see “Registrational Clinical Trials Process” below). The Company contemplates that the Study may be followed by a clinical trial that may or may not be conducted at MGH or with Dr. Rosenberg as the Principal Investigator. The Company will determine if clinical trials with the humanized version of Cytolin are warranted based on these and other results from studies with the murine molecule and subsequent confirmation of activity with the humanized version of Cytolin . There is no assurance that the results of the Study will warrant further clinical trials, or that a strategic alliance for humanized Cytolin will be available. ® ® ® The Clinical Trial Agreement governs the parties’ rights in Study data and the results of the Study (“Study Data and Results”). MGH retains ownership of all Study Data and Results, and is obligated to provide the Company with a copy of such Study Data and Results. The Clinical Trial Agreement places limits on the Company’s ability to use Study Data and Results. Specifically, the Company is permitted to use Study Data and Results that disclose individually identifiable health information only for purposes of the Study or related studies that concern murine Cytolin or medical conditions / disease area that are the subject of the Study, however, the Company is permitted to use information that is not identifiable for any research and development purposes. These uses are further limited by the requirements that any such use comply with applicable law (including the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”)); and that the use is permitted by the informed consent form used with subjects in connection with the Study. ® 5 Table of Contents Why Cytolin May Be a Unique Treatment for Early HIV Infection The particular epitope recognized by murine Cytolin is highly expressed on killer cells called cytotoxic T cells or CTLs. However, subsequent studies and analysis of the activity of Cytolin has shown that while Cytolin is highly expressed on CTLs, this antibody does not block CTLs. In addition to being expressed on CTLs, the CD11a protein has also been reported to be present on the surface of the HIV virion, presumably to assist in the infectious cycle of the virus. This opens the possibility that Cytolin may bind and neutralize HIV, providing a direct action against the virus in the bloodstream. ® ® ® ® In addition to CTLs, murine Cytolin also recognizes and binds to dendritic cells (DCs). These two types of immune cells are critical to ® the control of viral burden in HIV infected individuals. By binding to these cells, it is also possible that Cytolin may induce an antiviral activity that may impede infection of new cells and presumably lead to a reduction in viral burden. ® Acquisition of Advanced Genetic Technologies, Inc. On January 30, 2007, we acquired, from Utek Corp., our subsidiary Advanced Genetic Technologies, Inc., which holds the exclusive right to develop alternative antibodies that bind to the same cellular target as murine Cytolin . These two monoclonal antibodies were invented at Harvard University Medical School’s CBR Institute for Biomedical Research. The Company has not used these two antibodies in our research and development efforts to date but we may use these in future research and development efforts. ® Formation of CytoDyn Veterinary Medicine LLC and Current Research On May 16, 2011, we formed a wholly owned subsidiary, CVM, which will explore the possible application of feline reactive monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of the feline immunodeficiency virus (“FIV”). We view the formation of CVM and the exploration of CD11a-specific monoclonal antibodies to treat FIV as an effort to strategically diversify the use of monoclonal antibody expertise. On June 17, 2011, the Company filed a provisional patent application in the United States (Serial No. 61/498,029) for the use of certain antibodies as well as selected small molecule antagonists and agonists for the treatment of FIV. On June 15, 2012, the Company filed an international patent application (Serial No. PCT/US2012/042693) claiming priority to this provisional patent application. On August 10, 2011, the Company filed an application for registration of the trademark CYTOFELINE, intended for use in conjunction with veterinary preparations for the treatment of FIV (U.S. App. Ser. No. 85393956). In February 2012, the Company filed foreign trademark applications claiming priority to the US application for CYTOFELINE, including Australian App. No. 1473043, Canadian App. No. 1563313, European CTM App. No. 010625192, Indian App. No. 2279431, Japan App. No. 2012-008009, Mexican App. No. 1247597, and a Chinese App. No. 10475960. Thus far, the Company has received a 6 Table of Contents Certificate of Trademark Registration from Japan No. 5488875, with an effective registration date of April 20, 2012, and a Certificate of Trademark Registration from the European Union No. 010625192 with an effective registration date of June 11, 2012. Additionally, the Company’s Australian App. No. 1473043 was registered on May 31, 2012. On November 16, 2011, the Company and The Scripps Research Institute, a nonprofit institution (“Scripps Research”) entered into a six-month Research Funding and Option Agreement (the “Scripps Agreement”) that enabled Dr. John H. Elder, Professor in the Department of Immunology and Microbial Science at Scripps Research, to explore the potential application of the Company’s recently provisionally patented technology as an effective therapy in the treatment of FIV. The Company has assigned the Scripps Agreement to CVM. This study has now been completed. Through the course of this work Dr. Elder was able to identify a panel of anti-human monoclonal antibodies to CD11a that cross react with feline CD11a. These antibodies limited FIV infection in cell culture. The Company anticipates that if the data warrants publication Dr. Elder will draft and submit a manuscript detailing his results. The release of this or any data from this study is entirely dependent on Dr. Elder. While the original six-month period contemplated under the Scripps Agreement has expired, the Company will continue to engage Dr. Elder and Thomas Fitting, Esq., Ph.D., Chief Patent Counsel at Scripps Research, as consultants on an as needed basis through July 12, 2013. On February 15, 2012, the Company and Colorado State University (“CSU”) entered into a Research Funding and Option Agreement (the “CSU Agreement”) that will enable Dr. Susan VandeWoude Associate Dean for Research and Graduate Education, CVMBS; Professor, DMIP, to explore the potential application of the Company’s recently provisionally patented technology as an effective therapy in the treatment of FIV in infected cats. The Company has assigned the CSU Agreement to CVM. This study is designed to determine the effect of a single dose of murine CytoFeline on FIV RNA and DNA as well as a panel of other virologic and safety markers. The Company anticipates that if the data warrants publication Dr. VandeWoude will draft and submit a manuscript detailing her results. The release of this or any data from this study is entirely dependent on Dr. VandeWoude. ® On June 19, 2012, Dr. VandeWoude and Dr. Richard Trauger, the Company’s Managing Director of Science, were awarded a grant of $27,000 by CSU to study the pharmacokinetics of a chimeric version of CytoFeline in uninfected cats. The Company expects to generate and provide the chimeric version of the antibody for Dr. VandeWoude in the next six months. The Company anticipates that if the data from the study warrants publication Dr. VandeWoude and Dr. Trauger will draft and submit a manuscript detailing these results. ® Manufacturing and Source for Raw Materials We negotiated with a contract manufacturer, Vista Biologicals Corporation (“Vista”), to manufacture murine Cytolin suitable for use in ® our current ex vivo clinical trial of Cytolin at a cost of $565,000, all of which was paid by September 2008. In February 2010, we entered into a statement of work for the development of a humanized form of Cytolin at a cost of $229,500. Vista entered into an assignment agreement with us to transfer all rights and title to certain inventions and applications to us in consideration for our forgiveness of certain disputed amounts under the contractual arrangements between the parties. There are ongoing negotiations related to the ultimate obligations of the Company and Vista under both the 2008 and 2010 ® ® 7 Table of Contents contractual arrangements. Although a murine version of Cytolin was used for previous human experience that included approximately 200 patients treated for up to two years, as well as an encouraging uncontrolled Phase I(b)/II(a) study, and our current ex-vivo clinical trial, the Company understands that a fully-humanized version is necessary for the controlled clinical trials that are expected to follow the previous ones. On September 23, 2011, the Company filed a provisional patent application (Serial No. 61/534,942) in the United States for its humanized version of Cytolin , a monoclonal antibody for the treatment of HIV infection. The Company is currently in discussions with potential manufacturing sites to obtain clinical grade antibody for future clinical development of Cytolin . ® ® ® Patents and Trademarks We have a License Agreement with Allen D. Allen, our former Chief Executive Officer and former Chairman of the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”) that gives us the exclusive right to develop, market, and profit from his technology worldwide. This includes issued U.S. Patent Nos. 5,424,066; 5,651,970 and 6,534,057, as well as European Patent Nos. 0690725 and 1438970. In addition, Hong Kong Patent No. 1067958, Australian Patent Nos. 684074 and 2003203742, Canadian Patent No. 2156495, Austrian Patent Nos. 408418, 267019, and 1438970, Belgian Patent No. 1438970, Swiss Patent Nos. 1438970 and 0690725, German Patent Nos. 69433789 and 69435142.3, Danish Patent No. 1438970, Spanish Patent Nos. 2219647, 2314341, 04101437.4, and 94912826.8, French Patent Nos. 1438970 and 0690725, Great Britain Patent Nos. 1438970 and 069725, Greece Patent No. 3067384, Iceland Patent No. 1438970, Italian Patent Nos. 1438970 and 0690725, Luxenbourg Patent No. 1438970, Monaco Patent No. 1438970, Netherlands Patent Nos. 1438970 and 0690725, Portuguese Patent Nos. 690725 and 1438970, and Swedish Patent Nos. 0410437.4 and 94912826.8 have been obtained as well. We also acquired the federally registered trademarks, CYTODYN (U.S. Registration No. 2095498) and CYTOLIN (U.S. Registration No. 2095497), and a related design mark (U.S. Registration No. 2662777. The license acquired gives the Company the worldwide, exclusive right to develop, market and sell compounds disclosed by the patent claims, practice methods taught by the patent claims, and exploit specified technology related to the patents. The term of the license agreement is for the life of the patents of which the first will expire in 2013. The original expiration dates on the issued U.S. Patent Nos. 5,424,066; 5,651,970 and 6,534,057 are 2013, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The original expiration dates for the foreign patents listed above are in 2013 or 2014, if the required annuity fee payments are paid by September 21, 2012. The Company’s Cytolin-related patents referenced above are for a murine (mouse) version of the drug. The Company’s research on Cytolin ® to date has utilized the current murine version of the drug. However, on September 23, 2011, the Company filed a provisional patent application (Serial No. 61/534,942) in the United States for its humanized version of Cytolin , a monoclonal antibody for the treatment of HIV Infection. ® The Company is also exploring other antibodies as potential therapeutics for FIV. On June 17, 2011, the Company filed a provisional patent application in the United States (Serial No. 61/498,029) for the use of these antibodies as well as selected small molecule antagonists and agonists for the treatment of FIV. On June 15, 2012, the Company filed an international patent application (Serial No. PCT/US2012/042693) claiming priority to this provisional patent application. On August 10, 2011, the Company filed an application for registration of the trademark CYTOFELINE, intended for use in conjunction with veterinary preparations for the treatment of FIV (U.S. App. Ser. No. 85393956). In February 2012, the Company filed foreign 8 Table of Contents trademark applications claiming priority to the US application for CYTOFELINE, including Australian App. No. 1473043, Canadian App. No. 1563313, European CTM App. No. 010625192, Indian App. No. 2279431, Japan App. No. 2012-008009, Mexican App. No. 1247597, and a Chinese App. No. 10475960. Thus far, the Company has received a Certificate of Trademark Registration from Japan No. 5488875, with an effective registration date of April 20, 2012, and a Certificate of Trademark Registration from the European Union No. 010625192 with an effective registration date of June 11, 2012. Additionally, the Company’s Australian App. No. 1473043 was registered on May 31, 2012. Government Regulation Regulation of Health Care Industry The health care industry is highly regulated, and state and federal health care laws and regulations are applicable to certain aspects of our business. For example, there are federal and state health care laws and regulations that apply to the operation of clinical laboratories, the business relationships between health care providers and suppliers, the privacy and security of health information and the conduct of clinical research. Regulation of Products The design, testing, manufacture, safety, effectiveness, labeling, storage, record keeping, approval, advertising and promotion of our products is regulated by numerous third parties, including the FDA, foreign governments, independent standards auditors and our customers. In the United States, biological products have long been subject to regulation by various federal and state agencies, primarily as to product safety, efficacy, manufacturing, advertising, labeling, import, export and safety reporting. The exercise of broad regulatory powers by the FDA through its Center for Devices and Radiological Health and its Center for Biological Evaluation and Research continues to result in increases in the amounts of testing and documentation for FDA clearance of current and new biologic products. The FDA can ban certain biological products; detain or seize adulterated or misbranded biological products; order repair, replacement or refund of these products; and require notification of health professionals and others with regard to biological products that present unreasonable risks of substantial harm to the public health. The FDA may also enjoin and restrain certain violations of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, as amended, or the Public Health Service Act pertaining to certain biological products or initiate action for criminal prosecution of such violations. The lengthy process of seeking drug approvals, and the subsequent compliance with applicable statutes and regulations, require the expenditure of substantial resources. Failure to comply with applicable regulations can result in refusal by the FDA to approve product license applications. The FDA also has the authority to revoke previously granted product approvals. 9 Table of Contents Regulation of Laboratory Operations Clinical laboratories that perform laboratory testing (except for research purposes only) on human subjects are subject to regulation under Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (“CLIA”). CLIA regulates clinical laboratories by requiring that the laboratory be certified by the federal government, licensed by the state and comply with various operational, personnel and quality requirements intended to ensure that clinical laboratory test results are accurate, reliable and timely. State law and regulations also apply to the operation of clinical laboratories. State Governments Most states in which we operate have regulations that parallel federal regulations. Most states conduct periodic unannounced inspections and require licensing under such state’s procedures. Our research and development activities and the manufacture and marketing of our products are and will be subject to rigorous regulations relating to product safety and efficacy by numerous governmental authorities in the United States and other countries. Other Laws and Regulations We are subject to various laws and regulations relating to safe working conditions, clinical, laboratory and manufacturing practices, the experimental use of animals and the use and disposal of hazardous or potentially hazardous substances, including radioactive compounds and infectious disease agents, used in connection with our research. The extent of government regulation applying to our business that might result from any legislative or administrative action cannot be accurately predicted. Environmental We are subject to a variety of federal, state and local environmental protection measures. We believe that our operations comply in all material respects with applicable environmental laws and regulations. Our compliance with these regulations did not have during the past year and is not expected to have a material effect upon our capital expenditures, cash flows, earnings or competitive position. Registrational Clinical Trials Process Described below is the traditional registrational drug development track. Under the Company’s current business plan, much of this initial work may be sponsored and conducted by MGH, or a different clinical trial research facility, as determined by us at some point in the future and different studies may also be explored. After these trials have been initiated, the Company could enter into a strategic alliance with a larger pharmaceutical company after development has progressed to a certain point. The Company is exploring all options available to determine the most cost effective implementation of the clinical trial process. Phase I Phase I includes the initial introduction of an investigational new drug or biologic into humans. These studies are closely monitored and may be conducted in patients, but are usually conducted in a small number of healthy volunteer subjects. These studies are designed to determine the metabolic and pharmacologic actions of the investigational product in humans, the side effects associated with increasing doses, and, if possible, to gain early evidence on effectiveness. During Phase I, sufficient information about the investigational product’s pharmacokinetics and pharmacological effects are obtained to permit the design of well-controlled, scientifically valid, Phase II studies. 10 Table of Contents Phase II Phase II includes the early controlled clinical studies conducted to obtain some preliminary data on the effectiveness of the drug for a particular indication or indications in patients with the disease or condition. This phase of testing also helps determine the common short-term side effects and risks associated with the drug. Phase II studies are typically well-controlled, closely monitored, and conducted in a relatively small number of patients, usually involving several hundred people. In some cases, depending upon the need for a new drug, it may be licensed for sale in interstate commerce after a “pivotal” Phase II trial. Phase III Phase III studies are expanded controlled clinical studies. They are performed after preliminary evidence suggesting effectiveness of the drug has been obtained in Phase II, and are intended to gather the additional information about effectiveness and safety that is needed to evaluate the overall benefit/risk relationship of the drug. Phase III studies also provide an adequate basis for extrapolating the results to the general population and transmitting that information in the physician labeling. Phase III studies usually include several hundred to several thousand people. The Company may fund clinical trials using venture capital or through the sale of our common stock or other equity securities, or, at that time, may enter into a strategic alliance for completion of research and the subsequent marketing of humanized Cytolin if approved. In the former case, and while the cost will be to some extent determined by the trial size, we currently estimate that we will need to provide additional humanized product, which we estimate will cost approximately $500,000. The Company intends to conduct one or more private placement offerings of common shares to secure the needed capital. We cannot estimate the cost of any potential follow up study or whether any of the planned private placement offerings will be successful. ® Benchmark Patient Outreach Dose First Patient Lock Database - Begin Statistical Analysis Release Final Report Some Factors That Can Cause Delays+ Manufacturing Delays Documentation Delays IRB Delays Delays in Regulatory Review or Approval Force Majeure Fill and Finish Delays Slower Than Expected Patient Enrollment Force Majeure Slower Than Expected Patient Enrollment Clinical Hold Laboratory Error Protocol Deviation Force Majeure Additional Stratification Required Computer Hardware or Software Malfunction Force Majeure + There are other factors, known and unknown, such as unexpected financial hardships, that can cause delays. 11 Table of Contents Competition The pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries are characterized by rapidly evolving technology and intense competition. We will compete with other more established biotechnology companies which have greater financial resources than we have. Our potential competitors include entities that develop and produce therapeutic agents for treatment of human and animal disease. These include numerous public and private academic and research organizations and pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies pursuing production of, among other things, biologics from cell cultures, genetically engineered drugs and natural and chemically synthesized drugs. Almost all of these potential competitors have substantially greater capital resources, research and development capabilities, manufacturing and marketing resources and experience than we have. Our competitors may succeed in developing potential drugs or processes that are more effective or less costly than any that may be developed by us, or that gain regulatory approval prior to our potential drugs. Worldwide, there are many antiviral drugs for treating HIV and AIDS. In seeking to manufacture, distribute and market the various potential drugs we intend to develop, we face competition from established pharmaceutical companies. All of our potential competitors in this field have considerably greater financial and personnel resources than we possess. We also expect that the number of our competitors and potential competitors will increase as more potential drugs receive commercial marketing approvals from the FDA or analogous foreign regulatory agencies. Any of these competitors may be more successful than us in manufacturing, marketing and distributing our potential drugs. Research and Development Costs Our sponsored research and development expenses were $530,027, $480,765 and $2,759,495 in fiscal 2012, 2011 and for the period October 28, 2003 through May 31, 2012, respectively. We expect that research and development expenses will increase as we seek to expand development of our current and future product pipeline. Employees We have four full time employees, one part time employee, and a varying number of consultants engaged in management and product development. We are severely understaffed and will expand our employee force if we complete further financings. There can be no assurance we will be able to locate or secure suitable employees upon acceptable terms in the future. 12 Table of Contents Item 1A. Risk Factors. This item is not required for smaller reporting companies. Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments. None. Item 2. Properties. Our principal offices were located at 1511 Third Street, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505 for a portion of fiscal year 2011. We leased approximately 1,200 square feet under a lease from September 1, 2010 until August 31, 2011 at $1,650 per month. On June 7, 2011, the Board approved the relocation of the Company’s principal office to Lutz, Florida. Effective as of June 15, 2011, the principal office of the Company is now located at 110 Crenshaw Lake Road, Lutz, Florida 33548. We use approximately 1,600 square feet on an at-will tenancy basis at a cost of $1,650 per month in rent plus sales tax and reimbursement for utilities. The building related to this lease is owned by an affiliate of Kenneth Van Ness, our President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). Item 3. Legal Proceedings. On or about December 22, 2011, William Carmichael and Mojdeh Javadi (the “Plaintiffs”) filed a complaint against the Company in the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for the County of Clackamas, alleging breach of contract. The Plaintiffs alleged that the Company entered into a contract with the Plaintiffs in November 2007, then breached the terms of the contract by failing to issue warrants to the Plaintiffs entitling them to purchase shares of the Company’s stock (the “Breach of Contract” claims). The Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint against the Company on May 11, 2012 in which they asserted three additional claims each and amended the relief requested. In addition to the Breach of Contract claims, the Plaintiffs alleged in their Amended Complaint that: (i) they were third-party beneficiaries of a promise made by the Company to Nader Pourhassan in a Personal Services Agreement (the “Personal Services Agreement”), dated August 4, 2008 (the “Third Party Beneficiary” claims), (ii) they provided services to the Company and were entitled to the reasonable value for such services (the “Quantum Meruit” claims), and (iii) in reliance on the promises made in the Personal Services Agreement, the Company induced them to provide services to the Company and they were entitled to compensation for damages resulting from their reliance on those promises (the “Promissory Estoppel” claims). The Quantum Meruit and Promissory Estoppel claims were alternative claims to their Third Party Beneficiary claims. On the Breach of Contract claims, the Plaintiffs sought either compensatory damages in an amount not less than $750,000 each or the delivery of warrants to each Plaintiff to purchase 375,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for $0.25 per share. With respect to the Third Party Beneficiary claims, the Plaintiffs sought a judgment requiring the Company to deliver 650,000 shares of its common stock to each Plaintiff. With respect to the Quantum Meruit claims, Plaintiffs sought compensatory damages in an amount equal to the reasonable value of their services to the Company. With respect to the Promissory Estoppel claims, the Plaintiffs sought compensation for damages resulting from their reliance on the Company’s promises. The Plaintiffs also sought prejudgment interest, plus costs and disbursements incurred in the litigation. The Company filed an answer to the complaint on February 15, 2012. An answer to the Amended Complaint was filed on May 21, 2012. 13 Table of Contents On July 27, 2012, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release (the “Settlement Agreement”) with the above Plaintiffs. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the Company issued 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (“Shares”) to each of the Plaintiffs, for an aggregate total of 400,000 Shares. In addition, the Company issued warrants (“Warrants”) to purchase up to 375,000 Shares to each of the Plaintiffs, for an aggregate total of 750,000 Warrants. The Warrants are immediately exercisable at $0.25 per Share and shall expire on August 15, 2012. The Company issued the Shares and the Warrants to the Plaintiffs in exchange for their full and complete release of any and all claims against the Company as of July 27, 2012. Pursuant to and in accordance with the Settlement Agreement, on July 30, 2012, the Plaintiffs also dismissed with prejudice and without any award of costs, disbursements or attorney’s fees, their Amended Complaint against the Company filed in the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for the County of Clackamas. As of May 31, 2012, the Company recognized approximately $540,000 and $388,000 of compensation expense related to the Warrant grant, and the issuance of the Shares, respectively. In addition, from time to time, we are involved in claims and suits that arise in the ordinary course of our business. Management currently believes that resolving any such claims against us will not have a material adverse impact on our business, financial position or results of operations. Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures. Not applicable. PART II Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities. Market Information Our common stock trades on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board under the ticker symbol CYDY. The table below provides the high and low sales prices of our common stock for the periods indicated, as reported by the Over-the- Counter Bulletin Board quotations system: Price Range of Outstanding Common Stock Year Ended May 31, 2012 First Quarter Ended August 31, 2011 Second Quarter Ended November 30, 2011 Third Quarter Ended February 29, 2012 Fourth Quarter Ended May 31, 2012 14 High $ 2.75 Low $ 1.70 $ 3.00 $ 1.85 $ 4.40 $ 2.52 $ 2.80 $ 1.46 Table of Contents Year Ended May 31, 2011 First Quarter Ended August 31, 2010 Second Quarter Ended November 30, 2010 Third Quarter Ended February 28, 2011 Fourth Quarter Ended May 31, 2011 High $ 1.54 Low $ 0.75 $ 1.40 $ 0.95 $ 2.29 $ 1.15 $ 4.40 $ 1.70 Holders The number of record holders of our common stock on May 31, 2012 was approximately 1,256. This number includes shareholders that hold the shares in “street name” with brokers, dealers and other financial institutions. There have been 802,269 shares issued by the Company after May 31, 2012. Dividends Holders of our common stock are entitled to receive dividends as may be declared from time to time by our Board. We have not paid any cash dividends since inception on our common stock and do not anticipate paying any in the foreseeable future. Management’s current policy is to retain earnings, if any, for use in our operations. Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans The following table sets forth information regarding outstanding options and rights and shares reserved for future issuance under our existing equity compensation plans as of May 31, 2012. Equity Compensation Plan Information Plan category Equity compensation plans approved by security holders Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders (1) Total (a) Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b) Weighted- average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (c) Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) 3,658,500 6,669,164 10,327,664 $ $ $ 1.48 1.66 1.60 3,941,500 0 3,941,500 (1) Represents warrants issued by the Company (i) in connection with previous issuances of debt and previous private placements of the Company’s securities, (ii) as consideration for certain consulting services provided to the Company, and (iii) as consideration for the release of certain claims against the Company, and also includes the issuance of options (i) prior to the adoption of the 2004 Incentive Plan, (ii) to certain of our employees under their existing employment agreements, and (iii) to compensate Board members for their service as directors. 15 Table of Contents Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities On May 21, 2012, in connection with and as consideration for their services as members of the Board, the Company issued 3,743 shares of the Company’s common stock to each of Jordan Naydenov, Ronald Tropp, George Dembow and Gregory Gould. The Company also issued 1,703 shares of the Company’s common stock to Anthony Caracciolo, prorated for the period of his service as a Board member. The shares of common stock will vest in equal daily installments and will be fully vested on May 31, 2012. During the three months ended May 31, 2012, we issued to an investor upon exercise of warrants, 10,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $1.00 per share, for proceeds of $10,000. During the three months ended May 31, 2012, 45,900 shares of Series B were converted into 459,000 shares of common stock. The Series B is convertible into 10 shares of the Company’s common stock including any accrued dividend, with an effective fixed conversion price of $0.50 per share. During the three months ended May 31, 2012, we issued 42,900 shares of common stock related to these dividends. We issued and sold the aforementioned warrants, options, and common stock without registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), Rule 506, Rule 701 and, as applicable, Regulation S promulgated thereunder. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers There were no repurchases of any of our equity securities during the three months ended May 31, 2012. Item 6. Selected Financial Data. This item is not required for smaller reporting companies. 16 Table of Contents Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the other sections of this Annual Report, including our consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere herein. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements including information about possible or assumed results of our financial conditions, operations, plans, objectives and performance that involve risk, uncertainties and assumptions. The actual results may differ materially from those anticipated and set forth in such forward-looking statements. Results of Operations Results of operations for the year ended May 31, 2012 compared to May 31, 2011 are as follows: For the years ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, we had no activities that produced revenues from operations. For the year ended May 31, 2012, we had a net loss of approximately $7,474,000 compared to a net loss of approximately $3,720,000 for the corresponding period in 2011. For the year ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, we incurred operating expenses consisting primarily of stock-based compensation, accounting and consulting, research and development, salary, legal expenses, and various other selling and administrative expenses. The operating expenses for the years ended May 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows: Accounting and consulting Stock-based compensation Legal Salaries Research and development Depreciation and amortization Other Total 2012 2011 $ 524,000 2,858,000 1,469,000 1,623,000 530,000 2,000 450,000 $ 274,000 1,186,000 689,000 700,000 481,000 3,000 365,000 $7,456,000 $3,698,000 Accounting and consulting expenses increased approximately $250,000 from $274,000 in fiscal year 2011 to approximately $524,000 at May 31, 2012. Accounting expenses increased as the Company utilized more temporary accounting staff, as well as increased edgarization costs related to the Company’s increased filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The increase in consulting expenses relates primarily to the issuance of common stock to consultants for services, as well as the Company entering into a consulting agreement with the Company’s former CEO in the first quarter of fiscal year 2012. Stock-based compensation increased approximately $1,672,000 from approximately $1,186,000 at May 31, 2011 to $2,858,000 at May 31, 2012. The increase relates to options grants made to certain executives of the Company pursuant to employment agreements, as well 17 Table of Contents as warrants granted to certain consultants with immediate vesting rights. Additionally, as disclosed in “Item 3. Legal Proceedings” and footnotes 9 and 11 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company granted warrants and common stock pursuant to the Settlement Agreement. During fiscal year 2011, there were less option grants, and no grants with immediate vesting rights. The Company expects to continue to grant stock options in the future, and accordingly, stock-based compensation should continue to be a significant expense in the future. Legal expenses increased approximately $780,000 from approximately $689,000 at May 31, 2011 to $1,469,000 at May 31, 2012 due to a variety of matters, including assistance with: (i) litigation as discussed at footnote 9 of the consolidated financial statements; (ii) preparation or review and negotiation of contracts such as with third-party providers and employment agreements; (iii) responding to an investigation by the SEC; (iv) the Company’s SEC filings and corporate compliance; (v) ongoing claims and litigation and other disputes and the negotiation of associated proposed and/or final settlements with certain third parties; (vi) the Company’s ongoing fundraising efforts and related securities law research with respect to the Company’s past and current fundraising efforts; (vii) extensive negotiation and drafting of the Asset Purchase Agreement and related documentation relating to the Company’s proposed acquisition of PRO 140 from Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., as discussed in footnote 11 to the consolidated financial statements; and (viii) extensive research and review of Company records in order to facilitate bringing the Company’s SEC filings into compliance. The trend in the Company’s legal expenses will depend on the Company’s ability to raise proceeds and to hire additional staff who can perform certain functions that can help defray legal expenses. Salaries increased approximately $923,000 from approximately $700,000 in fiscal year 2011 to $1,623,000 in fiscal year 2012. The significant increase relates to the execution of executive employment contracts during fiscal year 2012, as well as the payment of certain discretionary bonuses to executives. The executive salaries in fiscal 2012 were significantly higher for certain executives relative to fiscal year 2011. Bonuses to executives are either based on achievement of targeted annual performance goals recommended by the compensation committee and approved by the Board, or are discretionary in nature based on Board approval. During fiscal year 2012, the Company granted discretionary bonuses of approximately $335,000. There were no bonuses granted during fiscal year 2011. Research and development expenses increased approximately $49,000 from approximately $481,000 in fiscal year 2011 to $530,000 in fiscal year 2012. The increase relates primarily to the Company entering into a consulting agreement for research related to the development of FIV therapeutics. Other expenses are comprised of various selling and administrative expenses which increased approximately $85,000 from approximately $365,000 in fiscal year 2011 to $450,000 in fiscal year 2012. The increase relates primarily to increases in investor relation costs, healthcare costs pursuant to employment agreements, and numerous other smaller increases. The increase or decrease in the above expenses will depend on the Company’s ability to raise additional capital and ultimately fund the Company’s clinical trials, and fund other operating costs as deemed necessary. 18 Table of Contents Rescission Liability The Company estimates an amount that is a probable indicator of the rescission liability and has recorded rescission liabilities for May 31, 2012 and May 31, 2011 of approximately $3,749,000 and $4,851,000, respectively. These amounts represent the believed potential rescission liability as of the dates presented, including any contingent interest payable to investors who accept the rescission right, and forfeit their shares. For the purpose of calculating and disclosing rescission liability, the Company has assumed that portions of the state claims are barred by the statutes of limitations of certain states based upon a literal interpretation of the applicable statute. Although the Company has assumed that affirmative defenses based upon the expiration of the statutes of limitations in these states may be generally available to bar these state claims, it has not had legal counsel undertake a detailed analysis of case law that might apply to defer or avoid application of a bar to such claims; thus, if rescission claims are made for those assumed to be barred by a statute of limitations and such claims are contested by the Company, until such affirmative defenses are ruled upon by judge in a proceeding adjudicating the rights at issue, no assurances can be made that, if asserted, such defenses would actually bar the rescission claims in these states. See Footnote 3 of our Consolidated Financial Statements on page 51 for further information regarding these rescission liabilities. Accrued Incentive Stock Compensation On August 4, 2008, the Company entered into the Personal Services Agreement with Nader Pourhassan. The Personal Services Agreement provided for compensation to Dr. Pourhassan at an annual salary of $200,000. Additionally, as incentive compensation, Dr. Pourhassan’s personal assistant and one additional person were to receive 50,000 common shares each of Company stock for every $500,000 in capital received by the Company through Dr. Pourhassan’s efforts. As of May 31, 2010, the Company accrued $1,180,000 related to the Personal Services Agreement. Subsequent to the fiscal year ended May 31, 2011, Dr. Pourhassan and the Company entered into a Mutual Release and Personal Services Termination Agreement (the “MRPSTA”) which relieves the Company of liability for any claims of compensation under the Personal Services Agreement. Simultaneously, with the signing of the MRPSTA, Dr. Pourhassan and the Company entered into a new Employment and Non-Compete Agreement whereby Dr. Pourhassan will serve as Managing Director of Business Development at an annual salary of $200,000. See Footnote 3 of our Consolidated Financial Statements on page 51 for further information. The Company had been accruing stock compensation and deferred offering costs related to the Personal Services Agreement as described at Note 3. Upon the signing of the MRPSTA, the Company at May 31, 2011 reversed all accrued stock compensation and deferring offering costs, as the Company currently has no further obligations under the Personal Services Agreement. Liquidity and Capital Resources. On May 31, 2012, we had negative working capital of approximately $4,007,000 as compared to a negative working capital of approximately $5,022,000 on May 31, 2011. 19 Table of Contents Cash Flows Net cash used in operating activities was approximately $4,391,000 during fiscal year 2012, which reflects an increase of approximately $2,570,000 from net cash used in operating activities of approximately $1,821,000 in 2011. The increase in the net cash used in operating activities for the above periods was primarily attributable to the following: • • Net loss increased approximately $3,755,000; and Accounts payable, accrued salary, accrued interest, and accrued liabilities decreased approximately $679,000. The above increases were partially offset by stock-based compensation increasing approximately $1,672,000 from 2011 to 2012. There were no other significant changes in cash used in operating activities from 2011 to 2012. There were no material changes in cash flows from investing activities from 2011 to 2012. Cash flows provided by financing activities of approximately $3,638,000 during fiscal year 2012 increased approximately $2,510,000 from approximately $1,128,000 during 2011. The increase in cash provided by financing activities for the above periods was attributable primarily to the increase in proceeds from the sale of common stock and the exercise of common stock options and warrants. There were no other significant changes in cash provided by financing activities from 2011 to 2012. As shown in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, for the year ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, and since October 28, 2003 through May 31, 2012 we incurred net losses of approximately $7,474,000 and $3,720,000 and $22,833,000, respectively. As of May 31, 2012, we have not emerged from the development stage. In view of these matters, our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to begin operations and to achieve a level of profitability. Since inception, we have financed our activities principally from the sale of public and private equity securities and proceeds from notes payable. We intend to finance our future development activities and our working capital needs largely from the sale of equity securities with some additional funding from other traditional financing sources. As previously mentioned, since October 28, 2003, we have financed our operations largely from the sale of common stock and preferred stock and proceeds from notes payable. From October 28, 2003 through May 31, 2012 we raised cash of approximately $10,504,000 (net of offering costs) through private placements of common stock, treasury stock and preferred stock financings and $1,537,000 through the issuance related party notes payable and convertible notes. The Company has raised approximately $612,000 from the issuance of common stock and preferred stock in conjunction with certain acquisitions in prior years. Additionally, the Company raised approximately $355,000 from the exercise of common stock options and warrants. In April 2010, our shareholders voted to amend our Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock to 100,000,000 shares; accordingly, we intend to continue to finance our operations through the sale of our shares. 20 Table of Contents Since October 28, 2003 through May 31, 2012, we have incurred approximately $2,759,000 of research and development costs and approximately $22,295,000 in operating expenses. We have incurred significant net losses and negative cash flows from operations since our inception. As of May 31, 2012, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $24,435,000 and negative working capital of approximately $4,007,000. We anticipate that cash used in product development and operations, especially in the marketing, production and sale of our products will increase significantly in the future. We currently do not have any significant material commitments related to capital expenditures. As described above, we do have material commitments related to our current Study (as defined above) of our product with MGH, and have potential obligations under our contracts with Vista. Going Concern We will require additional funding in order to continue with research and development efforts. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As shown in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company is currently in the development stage with losses for all periods presented. As of May 31, 2012 these factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to obtain additional operating capital, complete development of its medical treatments, obtain FDA approval, outsource manufacturing of the treatments, and ultimately to attain profitability. The Company intends to seek additional funding through equity offerings or licensing agreements to fund its business plan. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in these endeavors. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors. Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. 21 Table of Contents We believe that the following critical policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in preparation of our consolidated financial statements. We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of stock-based awards on the date of grant utilizing certain assumptions that require judgments and estimates. These assumptions include estimates for volatility, expected term, and risk-free interest rates in determining the fair value of the stock-based awards. We issue common stock to consultants for various services. Costs for these transactions are measured at the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more readily measurable. This determination requires judgment in terms of the consideration being measured. We estimated an amount that is a probable indicator of our rescission liability and will record rescission liabilities for May 31, 2012 and May 31, 2011 of $3,749,000 and $4,851,000, respectively. These amounts represent the believed potential rescission liability as of the dates presented, including any contingent interest payable to investors who accept the rescission right, and forfeit their shares. For the purpose of calculating and disclosing rescission liability, the Company has assumed that portions of the state claims are barred by the statutes of limitations of certain states based upon a literal interpretation of the applicable statute. Although the Company has assumed that affirmative defenses based upon the expiration of the statutes of limitations in these states may be generally available to bar these state claims, it has not had legal counsel undertake a detailed analysis of case law that might apply to defer or avoid application of a bar to such claims; thus, if rescission claims are made for those assumed to be barred by a statute of limitations and such claims are contested by the Company, until such affirmative defenses are ruled upon by judge in a proceeding adjudicating the rights at issue, no assurances can be made that, if asserted, such defenses would actually bar the rescission claims in these states. See Footnote 3 of our Consolidated Financial Statements on page 51 for further information. 22 Table of Contents Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk. This item is not required for smaller reporting companies. 23 Table of Contents Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. CYTODYN INC. (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) CONTENTS REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF MAY 31, 2012 AND MAY 31, 2011 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED MAY 31, 2012 AND 2011, AND FOR THE PERIOD FROM OCTOBER 28, 2003 TO MAY 31, 2012 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT) FOR THE PERIOD FROM OCTOBER 28, 2003 TO MAY 31, 2012 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR ENDED MAY 31, 2012 AND 2011, AND FOR THE PERIOD FROM OCTOBER 28, 2003 TO MAY 31, 2012 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 24 PAGE # 25 26 27 28 44 46 Table of Contents Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Board of Directors and Shareholders CytoDyn Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Lutz, Florida We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of CytoDyn Inc. (a development stage company) as of May 31, 2012 and 2011 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended and the period from October 28, 2003 through May 31, 2012. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required at this time, to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of CytoDyn Inc. as of May 31, 2012 and 2011 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended and the period from October 28, 2003 through May 31, 2012 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company incurred a net loss of $7,474,224 for the year ended May 31, 2012, has a working capital deficit of $4,006,969, and has an accumulated deficit of $24,434,518 from the date of inception through May 31, 2012, which raises a substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. /s/ Pender Newkirk & Company LLP Pender Newkirk & Company LLP Certified Public Accountants Tampa, Florida August 21, 2012 25 CytoDyn Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Consolidated Balance Sheets Table of Contents Assets Current Assets: Cash Prepaid expenses Deferred Offering Costs Total current assets Furniture and equipment, net Other Assets Liabilities and Shareholders’ (deficit) Current liabilities: Accounts payable Accrued liabilities Accrued salaries Indebtedness to related parties - short-term portion Accrued interest payable Deposits on stock purchases Stock rescission liability Total current liabilities Long-Term Liabilities Convertible notes payable, net Total Liabilities Shareholders’ (deficit): May 31, 2012 2011 $ 284,991 65,982 677,327 1,028,300 800 41,735 $ 1,070,835 $ 831,336 150,573 189,249 74,493 40,618 — 3,749,000 5,035,269 $ 1,037,818 59,275 876,423 1,973,516 5,374 15,748 $ 1,994,638 $ 932,996 756 — 148,985 26,696 1,035,000 4,851,000 6,995,433 9,000 5,044,269 6,937 7,002,370 Series B Convertible stock preferred stock, no par value; 400,000 shares authorized, 98,900 and 311,800 shares issued and outstanding at May 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively 451,993 1,566,016 Common stock, no par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 28,636,530 and 22,290,982 outstanding at May 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively; 28,836,530 and 22,490,982 issued at May 31, 2012 and May 31, 2011, respectively Common stock payable Additional paid-in capital Common and Preferred stock subject to rescission Treasury stock, at cost, 200,000 and 200,000 shares held at May 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively Additional paid-in capital - treasury stock Accumulated deficit on unrelated dormant operations Deficit accumulated during development stage Total shareholders’ (deficit) 15,150,261 388,000 8,020,533 (3,749,000) (100,000) 299,297 (1,601,912) (22,832,606) (3,973,434) $ 1,070,835 9,147,325 — 5,877,141 (4,851,000) (100,000) 313,080 (1,601,912) (15,358,382) (5,007,732) $ 1,994,638 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 26 Table of Contents Operating expenses: General and administrative Amortization / depreciation Research and development Legal fees Total operating expenses Operating loss Interest income Extinguishment of debt Interest expense: Interest on convertible debt Interest on notes payable Loss before income taxes Income tax provision Net loss Constructive preferred stock dividends Convertible preferred stock dividends Net loss applicable to common shareholders Basic and diluted loss per share CytoDyn Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Consolidated Statements of Operations Year ended May 31, 2012 2011 October 28, 2003 through May 31, 2012 $ 5,454,477 $ 2,525,661 $ 16,461,892 182,862 2,759,495 2,890,631 2,013 530,027 1,469,129 2,880 480,765 688,933 7,455,646 3,698,239 22,294,880 (7,455,646) (3,698,239) (22,294,880) — — — — 1,627 337,342 (2,063) (16,515) — (21,449) (736,926) (139,769) (7,474,224) (3,719,688) (22,832,606) — — — $ (7,474,224) $ (3,719,688) $(22,832,606) — $ (88,743) $ — $ (6,000,000) $ $ (97,293) $ (7,562,967) $ (3,728,238) $(28,929,899) (8,550) $ $ (0.31) $ (0.18) $ (2.04) Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding 24,618,812 21,076,430 14,204,081 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 27 Table of Contents CytoDyn Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit) Period October 28, 2003 through May 31, 2012 Balance at October 28, 2003, following recapitalization February through April 2004, sale of common stock less offering Preferred Stock Shares Amount — — Common Stock Shares Amount 6,252,640 $1,425,334 Additional Subject to Paid-In Capital Recession — 23,502 costs of $54,000 ($.30/share) — — 1,800,000 486,000 — — February 2004, shares issued to former officer as payment for working capital advance ($.30/share) — — 16,667 5,000 — — Net loss at year ended May 31, 2004 — — — — — — Balance at May 31, 2004 — — 8,069,307 1,916,334 23,502 — July 2004, capital contribution by an officer November 2004, common stock warrants granted February 2005, capital contribution by an officer Net loss at year ended May 31, 2005 Balance at May 31, 2005 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 512 — 11,928 — 5,000 — — — — — 8,069,307 1,916,334 40,942 — 28 Table of Contents CytoDyn Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit) Period October 28, 2003 through May 31, 2012 Balance at October 28, 2003, following recapitalization February through April 2004, sale of common stock less offering Treasury Stock APIC — Stock for Prepaid Services — $(1,594,042) Accumulated Deficit Deficit Accumulated During Development Stage — Total $(145,206) costs of $54,000 ($.30/share) — — — — 486,000 February 2004, shares issued to former officer as payment for working capital advance ($.30/share) — — — — 5,000 Net loss at year ended May 31, 2004 — — (7,870) (338,044) (345,914) Balance at May 31, 2004 — — (1,601,912) (338,044) July 2004, capital contribution by an officer November 2004, common stock warrants granted February 2005, capital contribution by an officer Net loss at year ended May 31, 2005 Balance at May 31, 2005 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. — — — — — — — — — — — — (120) 512 11,928 5,000 — — — (777,083) (777,083) — — (1,601,912) (1,115,127) (759,763) 29 Table of Contents CytoDyn Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit) Period October 28, 2003 through May 31, 2012 Preferred Stock Shares Amount Common Stock Additional Shares Amount Paid-In Capital June through July 2005, sale of common stock less offering costs of $27,867($.75/share) — — 289,890 189,550 August 2005, common shares issued to extinguish promissory notes payable and related interest ($.75/share) — — 160,110 120,082 May 2006, common shares issued to extinguish convertible debt — — 350,000 437,500 November 2005, 94,500 warrants exercised ($.30/share) — — 94,500 28,350 January through April 2006, common shares issued for prepaid services — — 183,857 370,750 Amortization of prepaid stock services — — — — — — — — — — January through May 2006, warrants issued with convertible debt — — — — 274,950 January through May 2006, beneficial conversion feature of convertible debt — — — — 234,550 March through May 2006, stock options granted to consultants — — — — 687,726 30 Table of Contents CytoDyn Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit) Period October 28, 2003 through May 31, 2012 Treasury Stock APIC Stock for Prepaid Services Accumulated Deficit Deficit Accumulated During Development Stage Total June through July 2005, sale of common stock less offering costs of $27,867 ($.75/share) August 2005, common shares issued to extinguish promissory notes payable and related interest ($.75/share) May 2006, common shares issued to extinguish convertible debt November 2005, 94,500 warrants exercised ($.30/share) January through April 2006, common shares issued for prepaid services Amortization of prepaid stock services January through May 2006, warrants issued with convertible debt January through May 2006, beneficial conversion feature of convertible debt March through May 2006, stock options granted to consultants See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 31 — — — — 189,550 — — — — 120,082 — — — — — (370,750) — 103,690 — — — — — 437,500 — 28,350 — — — 103,690 — — — — 274,950 — — — — — — — 234,550 — 687,726 Table of Contents CytoDyn Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit) Period October 28, 2003 through May 31, 2012 Preferred Stock Common Stock March 2006, stock options issued to extinguish debt Amount Shares — — Net loss at year ended May 31, 2006 — — Shares Amount — — — — Additional Paid-In Capital 86,341 Subject to Rescission — — — Balance at May 31, 2006 — — 9,147,664 3,062,566 1,324,509 — Common stock issued to extinguish convertible debt — — 119,600 149,500 — — Common stock issued for AITI acquisition — — 2,000,000 934,399 — — Amortization of prepaid stock services Common stock payable for prepaid services Stock-based compensation Warrants issued with convertible debt — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 120,000 — 535,984 — 92,500 — Common stock issued for services — — 30,000 26,400 — — Preferred shares issued AGTI Net loss, May 31, 2007 Balance at May 31, 2007 100,000 167,500 — — — — — — — — — — 100,000 167,500 11,297,264 4,172,865 2,072,993 — 32 Table of Contents CytoDyn Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit) Period October 28, 2003 through May 31, 2012 March 2006, stock options issued to extinguish debt Net loss at year ended May 31, 2006 Balance at May 31, 2006 Common stock issued to extinguish convertible debt Common stock issued for AITI acquisition Amortization of prepaid stock services Common stock payable for prepaid services Stock-based compensation Warrants issued with convertible debt Common stock issued for services Preferred shares issued AGTI Net loss, May 31, 2007 Balance at May 31, 2007 Treasury Stock APIC Stock for Prepaid Services Accumulated Deficit Deficit Accumulated During Development Stage Total — — — — — — 86,341 — (2,053,944) (2,053,944) — (267,060) (1,601,912) (3,169,071) (650,968) — — — — — 267,060 — (106,521) — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 149,500 934,399 267,060 13,479 535,984 92,500 26,400 167,500 — (2,610,070) (2,610,070) — (106,521) (1,601,912) (5,779,141) (1,074,216) See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 33 Table of Contents CytoDyn Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit) Period October 28, 2003 through May 31, 2012 Preferred Stock Common Stock Additional Subject to Amortization of prepaid stock for services Shares — — Amount Shares Amount Paid-In Capital — Rescission — — Stock based compensation — — — 461,602 Common stock issued to extinguish convertible debt — — 750,000 75,000 Rescission of common stock issued for services — — (142,857) (100,000) — — Original issue discount convertible debt with warrants — — — — 3,662 — — — — — — Original issue discount convertible debt with beneficial conversion feature — — — — 75,000 — Stock issued for cash ($.50/share) — — 642,000 321,000 — (321,000) Net loss Balance at May 31, 2008 — — — — — — 100,000 $167,500 12,546,407 $4,468,865 $ 2,613,257 (321,000) 34 Table of Contents CytoDyn Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit) Period October 28, 2003 through May 31, 2012 Amortization of prepaid stock for services Stock based compensation Common stock issued to extinguish convertible debt Rescission of common stock issued for services Original issue discount convertible debt with warrants Original issue discount convertible debt with beneficial conversion feature Stock issued for cash ($.50/share) Net loss Balance at May 31, 2008 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. Treasury Stock APIC Stock for Prepaid Services Accumulated Deficit Deficit Accumulated During Development Stage — 106,521 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total 106,521 461,602 75,000 (100,000) 3,662 75,000 — — — — (1,193,684) (1,193,684) — — $(1,601,912) $(6,972,825) $(1,646,115) 35 Table of Contents Stock issued for cash ($.50/share) CytoDyn Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit) Period October 28, 2003 through May 31, 2012 Preferred Stock Common Stock Shares — Amount Shares Amount Paid-In Capital — 3,023,308 $1,511,654 Additional Subject to Rescission — (1,494,000) Stock issued for services ($.50/share) — — 388,200 194,100 Stock issued for services ($.37/share) — — 150,000 55,500 — — Stock based compensation — — — — 371,996 Stock issued in payment of accounts payable, ($.50/share) — — 98,000 49,000 Stock issued for services ($.42/share) — — 15,400 6,468 — — — — — — — — — 8,900 — — — — — — — — — 100,000 $167,500 16,221,315 $6,285,587 $ 2,994,153 $(1,815,000) — — 236,400 118,200 — (118,200) — — 632,000 290,500 — (290,500) — — 304,580 137,061 — (137,061) Capital contribution Net loss ended May 31, 2009 Balance at May 31, 2009 Stock issued for cash ($.50/share) Stock issued for cash ($.50/share) Stock issued for cash ($.50/share) Conversion of debt to Common stock ($.45/share) — — 325,458 146,456 — — 36 Table of Contents CytoDyn Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit) Period October 28, 2003 through May 31, 2012 Treasury Stock Treasury Shares Amount Stock APIC Stock for Prepaid Services Accumulated Deficit Stock issued for cash ($.50/share) — — — — Stock issued for services ($.50/share) — — — — Stock issued for services ($.37/share) — — — — Stock based compensation — — — — Stock issued in payment of accounts payable, ($.50/share) — — — — Stock issued for services ($.42/share) — — — — Capital contribution — — — — — — — — — — — Deficit Accumulated During Development Stage Total — $ 17,654 — — — — — — 194,100 55,500 371,996 49,000 6,468 8,900 Net loss ended May 31, 2009 — — — — — (1,306,004) (1,306,004) Balance at May 31, 2009 — — — — $(1,601,912) $(8,278,829) $(2,248,501) Stock issued for cash ($.50/share) — — — — Stock issued for cash ($.50/share) — — — — Stock issued for cash ($.50/share) — — — — Conversion of debt to Common stock ($.45/share) — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 146,456 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 37 Table of Contents CytoDyn Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit) Period October 28, 2003 through May 31, 2012 Preferred Stock Common Stock Conversion of preferred stock to common stock Shares (100,000) Amount (167,500) Shares 2,356,142 Amount 167,500 — Additional Paid-In Capital Subject to Rescission — Stock-based compensation — — — — 1,671,118 — Original issue discount convertible debt with beneficial conversion feature Expiration of rescission liabilities Repurchase of common stock ($.28/share) Repurchase of common stock ($.50/share) Stock issued for cash ($.50/share) Stock issued for services ($1.45/share) Stock issued for cash ($.50/share) — — — — — — — — — 38,604 — — — — 903,550 — — — — — — — — — — — (277,000) — — — — — — — (253,789) — — — — — — — 38 Table of Contents CytoDyn Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit) Period October 28, 2003 through May 31, 2012 Treasury Stock Shares Amount Treasury Stock APIC Stock for Prepaid Services Accumulated Deficit Deficit Accumulated During Development Stage Total Conversion of preferred Stock to common stock Stock-based compensation Original issue discount convertible debt with beneficial conversion feature Expiration of rescission liabilities — — — — — — — — Repurchase of common stock ($.28/share) (1,200,000) (336,000) Repurchase of common stock ($.50/share) (200,000) (100,000) — — — — — — Stock issued for cash ($.50/share) 550,000 154,000 123,000 — — — — — — — Stock issued for services ($1.45/share) 81,580 22,842 95,449 (118,291) Stock issued for cash ($.50/per share) 568,420 159,158 94,631 — See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 39 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,671,118 — 38,604 — 903,550 — (336,000) — (100,000) — — — — — — Table of Contents CytoDyn Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit) Period October 28, 2003 through May 31, 2012 Preferred Stock Common Stock Amortization of prepaid Stock for services Series B Convertible Preferred stock issued for cash Shares — Amount Shares Amount Additional Paid-In Capital Rescission Amount — — — — — ($5.00/share) Net Loss, ended May 31, 2010 400,000 2,009,000 — — — — — — — (2,009,000) — — Balance at May 31, 2010 400,000 $2,009,000 20,075,895 $7,145,304 $ 4,703,875 $(3,997,000) Conversion of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock to Common Stock (88,200) (442,984) 882,000 442,984 Stock issued for services ($1.23/share) Capital contribution Stock issued for cash ($1.00/share) — — — Series B Convertible Preferred Stock dividends — Stock based compensation Rescission expirations and exclusions Amortization of prepaid Stock for services Net Loss, ended May 31, 2011 — — — — — — 150,000 184,500 — — 229,500 — — — — — — 1,365,987 1,365,987 — (1,365,987) — — — — — 17,100 8,550 (8,550) — — — — — — — — 952,316 — — — — — 511,987 — — Balance at May 31, 2011 311,800 $1,566,016 22,490,982 $9,147,325 $ 5,877,141 $(4,851,000) 40 Table of Contents CytoDyn Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit) Period October 28, 2003 through May 31, 2012 Treasury Stock Shares Amount Treasury Stock APIC Stock for Prepaid Services Accumulated Deficit Deficit Accumulated During Development Stage Amortization of prepaid Stock for services — — — 69,003 — — Total 69,003 Series B Convertible Preferred stock issued For cash ($5.00/share) Net Loss, ended May 31, 2010 — — — — — — — — — — — — (3,359,865) (3,359,865) Balance at May 31, 2010 (200,000) $(100,000) $313,080 $(49,288) $(1,601,912) $(11,638,694) $(3,215,635) Conversion of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock to Common Stock Stock issued for services ($1.23/share) Capital contribution Stock issued for cash ($1.00/share) Stock-based compensation (unaudited) Rescission expirations and exclusions (unaudited) Amortization of prepaid Stock for services Net Loss, ended May 31, 2011 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 49,288 — — — — — — — — — — 184,500 — 229,500 — — — 952,316 — 511,987 — 49,288 — — — — (3,719,688) (3,719,688) Balance at May 31, 2011 (200,000) $(100,000) $313,080 — $(1,601,912) $(15,358,382) $(5,007,732) See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 41 Table of Contents CytoDyn Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit) Period October 28, 2003 through May 31, 2012 Preferred Stock Common Stock Shares Amount Shares Amount Common Stock Payable Additional Paid-In Capital Rescission Amount Rescission expirations and exclusions — — — — — — 1,102,000 Conversion of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock to Common Stock (212,900) (1,064,500) 2,129,000 1,064,500 — — — Series B Convertible Preferred Stock Dividends Series B Convertible Preferred Stock Cash — — 177,485 88,743 — (88,743) — Dividends — — — — — (1,500) — Common Stock issued for services to consultants ($2.55-$2.80/share) Common Stock issued for services to Directors ($2.07/share) Common Stock issued for cash ($1.50/share) Exercise of Common Stock options ($.30- — — 72,500 203,000 — — — — — 16,675 34,560 — — — — — 1,997,388 2,996,024 — — — $1.00/share) — — 527,500 326,900 — — — Common shares issued from Escrow liability ($1.00/share) Common stock to be issued related to legal — — 1,425,000 1,425,000 — — — settlement ($0.97/share) — — — — 388,000 — — Amortization of deferred offering costs related to rescission liability Capital Contribution Stock based compensation Warrants to be issued related to legal settlement Net Loss, ended May 31, 2012 — (49,523) — (135,791) — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,336 — 1,692,290 — 540,009 — — — — — — — Balance at May 31, 2012 98,900 $ 451,993 28,836,530 $15,150,261 $(388,000) $ 8,020,533 $(3,749,000) See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 42 Table of Contents CytoDyn Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit) Period October 28, 2003 through May 31, 2012 Treasury Stock Shares Amount Treasury Stock APIC Stock for Prepaid Services Accumulated Deficit Deficit Accumulated During Development Stage Total Rescission expirations and exclusions — — — — — — 1,102,000 Conversion of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock to Common Stock Series B Convertible Preferred Stock Dividends Series B Convertible Preferred Stock Cash Dividends Common Stock issued for services to consultants ($2.80/share) Common Stock issued for services to Directors ($2.07/share) Common Stock issued for cash ($1.50/share) Exercise of Common Stock options ($.62/share) Common shares issued from Escrow liability — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — (1,500) — — — — — — 203,000 — — — — — — 34,560 — — — — — — 2,996,024 — — — — — — 326,900 ($1.00/share) — — — — — — 1,425,000 Common stock to be issued related to legal settlement ($0.97/share) Amortization of deferred offering costs related to rescission liability Capital Contribution Stock based compensation Warrants to be issued related to legal settlement Net Loss, ended May 31, 2012 — — — — — — 388,000 — — — — — — (13,783) — — — — — — — — — — — — (199,097) 1,336 — 1,692,290 — — — — — 540,009 — — — — (7,474,224) (7,474,224) Balance at May 31, 2012 (200,000) $(100,000) 299,297 — $(1,601,912) $(22,832,606) $(3,973,434) See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 43 Table of Contents CytoDyn Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Cash flows from operating activities Net loss Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities: Amortization / depreciation Loss on disposal of furniture and equipment Amortization of original issue discount Extinguishment of debt Purchased in process research and development Stock-based compensation Changes in current assets and liabilities: Increase in accrued salaries Increase in prepaid expenses (Increase) decrease in other assets Increase in accounts payable, accrued interest and accrued liabilities Net cash used in operating activities Cash flows from investing activities: Furniture and equipment purchases Net cash used in investing activities Cash flows from financing activities: Capital contributions by executive Preferred stock dividends Proceeds from notes payable to related parties Payments on notes payable to related parties Proceeds from notes payable issued to individuals Payments on notes payable issued to individuals Proceeds from convertible notes payable Proceeds from the sale of common stock Proceeds from Series B preferred stock Purchase of treasury stock Proceeds from sale of treasury stock Deferred offering cost Proceeds from issuance of stock of AITI acquisition Proceeds from issuance of stock of AGTI acquisition Proceeds from exercise of warrants and options Year Ended May 31 2012 2011 October 28, 2003 through May 31, 2012 $(7,474,224) $(3,719,688) $ (22,832,606) 2,013 2,560 2,063 — — 2,857,859 2,880 — — — — 1,186,104 189,249 (6,707) (25,987) 62,079 — (39,648) 8,227 740,708 182,862 2,560 719,265 (337,342) 274,399 8,577,984 189,249 (65,982) (41,735) 1,321,983 (4,391,095) (1,821,417) (12,009,363) — — 1,336 (1,500) — (74,492) — — — 3,386,024 — — — — — — 326,900 (4,705) (4,705) — — (5,000) — — — 2,400,987 — — — (232,544) — — — (21,083) (21,083) 15,748 (1,500) 705,649 (239,990) 145,000 (34,500) 686,000 8,966,072 2,009,000 (436,000) 559,210 (1,029,940) 512,200 100,000 355,250 Net cash provided by financing activities 3,638,268 2,163,443 12,312,199 Net change in cash Cash, beginning of period Cash, end of period Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: Cash paid during the period for: Income taxes Interest (752,827) 337,321 1,037,818 700,497 281,753 3,238 $ 284,991 $ 1,037,818 $ 284,991 $ $ — 2,593 $ $ — 21,128 $ $ — 26,757 44 Table of Contents CytoDyn Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Year ended May 31, 2012 2011 October 28, 2003 through May 31, 2012 Non-cash investing and financing transactions: Net assets acquired in exchange for common stock in CytoDyn/Rexray business combination Common stock issued to former officer to repay working capital advance Common stock issued for convertible debt Common stock issued for debt Common stock issued for accrued interest payable Options to purchase common stock issued for debt Original issue discount and intrinsic value of beneficial conversion feature related to debt issued with warrants Common stock issued for preferred stock Treasury stock issued for prepaid services Common Stock issued on payment of accounts payable $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ — — — — — — — — — — $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ — — — — — — — — — — Preferred and common stock subject to rescission $1,102,000 $ 854,000 Accrued stock incentive and deferred offering costs $ — $ 537,000 Common stock issued for Series B preferred stock $1,064,500 $ 442,984 Series B preferred stock dividends Accrued salaries related party contributed as capital Reversal of accrued stock incentive and deferred offering costs Constructive dividend $ $ $ $ Amortization of deferred offering costs related to rescission liability Common shares issued from escrow liability $ 199,097 $1,425,000 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 45 88,743 $ 8,550 — $ 229,500 — $1,717,000 — $ $ $ — — — $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 7,542 5,000 662,000 245,582 20,956 62,341 719,266 167,500 118,291 49,000 3,749,000 1,717,000 1,507,484 97,293 229,500 1,717,000 6,000,000 199,097 1,425,000 Table of Contents 1 - Organization CYTODYN INC. (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF MAY 31, 2012 CytoDyn Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of Colorado on May 2, 2002 under the name Rexray Corporation (“Rexray”). In October 2003, the Company (under its previous name RexRay Corporation) entered into an Acquisition Agreement with CytoDyn of New Mexico, Inc. Pursuant to the acquisition agreement, the Company acquired assets related to its leading drug candidate, Cytolin , including the assignment of the patent license agreement dated July 1, 1994 between CytoDyn of New Mexico, Inc. and Allen D. Allen covering three United States patents along with foreign counterpart patents which describe a method for treating Human Immunodeficiency Virus (“HIV”) disease with the use of monoclonal antibodies. ® The Company entered the development stage effective October 28, 2003 upon the reverse merger and recapitalization of the Company and follows Financial Standard Accounting Codification No. 915, Development Stage Entities. Advanced Genetic Technologies, Inc. (“AGTI”) was incorporated under the laws of Florida on December 18, 2006 pursuant to an acquisition during 2006. 46 Table of Contents CYTODYN INC. (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF MAY 31, 2012 On May 16, 2011, the Company formed a wholly owned subsidiary, CVM, which will explore the possible application of feline reactive monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of Feline Immunodeficiency Virus (“FIV”), a retroviral infection in cats. The Company views the formation of CVM and the exploration of CD11a-specific monoclonal antibodies to treat FIV as an effort to strategically diversify the use of monoclonal antibody expertise. 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries; AGTI and CVM. All intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation. Reclassifications Certain prior year amounts shown in the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2012 presentation. These reclassifications did not have any effect on total current assets, total assets, total current liabilities, total liabilities, total shareholders’ deficit, or net loss. Going Concern The consolidated accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As shown in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company is currently in the development stage with losses for all periods presented. The Company incurred a net loss of $7,474,224 for the period ended May 31, 2012, has an accumulated deficit of $24,434,518, and a working capital deficit of $4,006,969 as of May 31, 2012. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability of assets and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to obtain additional operating capital, complete development of its product candidates, obtain U.S. Food & Drug Administration (the “FDA”) approval, outsource manufacturing of the product candidates, and ultimately to attain profitability. The Company intends to seek additional funding through equity offerings to fund its business plan. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in these endeavors. 47 Table of Contents Use of Estimates CYTODYN INC. (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF MAY 31, 2012 The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Cash The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments with original maturities of three months or less when acquired to be cash equivalents. The Company had no cash equivalents as of May 31, 2012 or May 31, 2011. Cash is maintained at financial institutions, and, at times, balances may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has never experienced any losses related to these balances. All of the Company’s non-interest bearing cash balances were fully insured at May 31, 2012 due to a temporary federal program in effect from December 31, 2010 through December 31, 2012. Under the program, there is no limit to the amount of insurance for eligible accounts. Beginning 2013, insurance coverage will revert to $250,000 per depositor at each financial institution, and our non-interest bearing cash balances may again exceed federally insured limits. Interest-bearing amounts on deposits in excess of federally insured limits at May 31, 2012 were approximately $8,000. As of May 31, 2012, the Company received a total of $1,425,000 in cash related to deposits received from certain common stock purchases as compared to $1,035,000 as of May 31, 2011. These deposits were received by the Company from prospective investors (the “Prospective Investors”) after the Company made an announcement on February 18, 2011 related to its potential rescission (see Note 3) and other liabilities to investors who had made investments in the Company during the period beginning on April 15, 2008 and ending on February 18, 2011. During the three months ended February 29, 2012, the Company sent confirmations to the Prospective Investors asking them to either confirm their investment in the Company or request that their deposit be returned to them. The Company received confirmations for $1,425,000 in cash deposits from Prospective Investors confirming their original investment. As of May 31, 2012, the $1,425,000 is included as common stock. Furniture and Equipment Furniture and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, generally three to seven years. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred and major improvements or betterments are capitalized. Gains or losses on sales or retirements are included in the consolidated statements of operations in the year of disposition. 48 Table of Contents CYTODYN INC. (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF MAY 31, 2012 Research and Development Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Financial Instruments At May 31, 2012 and May 31, 2011, the carrying value of the Company’s financial instruments approximate fair value due to the short-term maturity of the instruments. The Company’s notes payable have market rates of interest, and accordingly, the carrying values of the notes approximates the fair value. Stock-Based Compensation U.S. GAAP requires companies to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for the award of equity instruments based on the fair value of the award at the date of grant. The expense is to be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award (requisite service period). The Company accounts for common stock options, and common stock warrants granted based on the fair market value of the instrument using the Black-Scholes option pricing model utilizing certain weighted average assumptions such as expected stock price volatility, term of the options and warrants, risk-free interest rates, and expected dividend yield at the grant date. The risk-free interest rate assumption is based upon observed interest rates appropriate for the expected term of the stock options. The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock at consistent intervals. The Company has not paid any dividends on its common stock since its inception and does not anticipate paying dividends on its common stock in the foreseeable future. The computation of the expected option term is based on the “simplified method” as the Company’s stock options are “plain vanilla” options and the Company has a limited history of exercise data. For common stock options and warrants with graded vesting, the Company recognizes the related compensation costs associated with these options and warrants on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. U.S. GAAP requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Based on limited historical experience of forfeitures, the Company estimated future unvested option forfeitures at 0% as of May 31, 2012 and May 31, 2011. 49 Table of Contents Deferred Offering Costs CYTODYN INC. (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF MAY 31, 2012 In connection with a stock rescission liability as discussed at Note 3, the Company has recorded approximately $677,000 and $876,000 in deferred offering costs as of May 31, 2012 and May 31, 2011, respectively. These deferred offering costs have been recorded as a current asset for the respective periods. The asset will be offset against equity, and reduce equity in the period the investors described in Note 3 do not accept the rescission right and keep their shares. Conversely, if the investors accept the rescission right and forfeit their shares, the deferred offering costs will be expensed at that time. Stock for Services The Company issues common stock, warrants and common stock options to consultants for various services. Costs for these transactions are measured at the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The value of the common stock is measured at the earlier of (i) the date at which a firm commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached or (i) the date at which the counterparty’s performance is complete. (Loss) Per Common Share Basic (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted (loss) per share is computed by dividing net (loss) by the weighted average common shares and potentially dilutive common share equivalents. The effects of potential common stock equivalents are not included in computations when their effect is anti-dilutive. Because of the net losses for all periods presented, the basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding are the same since including the additional shares would have an anti-dilutive effect on the loss per share calculation. Common stock options and warrants to purchase 10,327,664, 7,473,576 and 10,327,664 shares of common stock were not included in the computation of diluted weighted average common shares outstanding for the periods ended May 31, 2012, 2011 and for the period October 28, 2003 to May 31, 2012 respectively, as inclusion would be anti-dilutive for these periods. Additionally, as of May 31, 2012, 98,900 shares of Series B convertible stock can potentially convert into 989,000 shares of common stock. Income Taxes Deferred taxes are provided on the asset and liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary 50 Table of Contents CYTODYN INC. (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF MAY 31, 2012 differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Future tax benefits for net operating loss carryforwards are recognized to the extent that realization of these benefits is considered more likely than not. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The Company follows the provisions of FASB ASC 740-10 “Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (ASC 740-10). A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits has not been provided since there are no unrecognized benefits at May 31, 2012 or 2011 and since the date of adoption. The Company has not recognized interest expense or penalties as a result of the implementation of ASC 740-10. If there were an unrecognized tax benefit, the Company would recognize interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefit in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses. The Company is subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and state tax authorities for tax years ending after 2008. 3 - Rescission Liabilities The Company’s board of directors (the “Board”) was advised by outside legal counsel that compensation the Company previously paid to an employee and certain other non-employees who were acting as unlicensed, non-exempt broker-dealers soliciting investors on behalf of the Company from April 15, 2008 to February 18, 2011 was a violation of certain state and possibly federal securities laws. As a result, such investors and potentially others have rescission or monetary claims (“Claims”) against the Company, and the Company’s liability for these potential Claims is now being properly reflected in the Company’s financial statements. On March 16, 2011, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K disclosing the potential rescission liability (the “Liability Disclosure”). On July 21, 2011, the Company filed a Current Report of Form 8-K disclosing its receipt of an SEC letter of inquiry and request for voluntary assistance in discovering information related to the Liability Disclosure. By letter dated January 3, 2012, the Division of Enforcement of the Securities and Exchange Commission notified the Company that the SEC had completed its informal investigation of the Company and is recommending no enforcement action be taken against the Company, or its officers, directors, or employees. Rescission rights for individual investors and subscribers vary, based upon the laws of the states in which the investors or subscribers reside. Investments and subscriptions that are subject to rescission are recorded separately in our financial statements from stockholders’ deficiency in the Company’s balance sheet. As the statute of limitations expire in the respective states, such amounts for those shares are reclassified to stockholders’ deficiency. Investors who have sold their shares of capital stock of the Company do not have rescission rights, but instead have claims for damages, to the extent their shares were sold at a net loss, which is determined by subtracting the purchase price plus statutory interest and costs (if any) from the sale price. Based on the Company’s ongoing investigation, assuming there are no affirmative defenses or exemptions available to the Company, investors may have up to approximately $6.4 million of federal and state Claims against the Company as of the date of filing this Form 10-K. These 51 Table of Contents CYTODYN INC. (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF MAY 31, 2012 investor Claims could include approximately $3.75 million of potential state or foreign jurisdiction Claims involving approximately 17 states and 5 foreign jurisdictions that may not be currently barred by the applicable statute of limitations or state law exemptions from broker-dealer registration requirements and these investors may also have overlapping federal Claims; the remainder could involve investors who do not have state law Claims but who may have federal rescission or damages rights if such rights can be proven to exist because of the Company’s failure to disclose contingent liabilities related to the state and foreign jurisdiction Claims. The Company is continuing with its scientific and business plans in the ordinary course. The Company estimates an amount that is a probable indicator of the rescission liability and recorded rescission liabilities for May 31, 2012 and May 31, 2011 of approximately $3,749,000 and $4,851,000, respectively. These amounts represent the believed potential rescission liability as of the dates presented, including any contingent interest payable to investors who accept the rescission right, and forfeit their shares. For the purpose of calculating and disclosing rescission liability, the Company has assumed that portions of the state claims are barred by the statutes of limitations of certain states based upon a literal interpretation of the applicable statute. Although the Company has assumed that affirmative defenses based upon the expiration of the statutes of limitations in these states may be generally available to bar these state claims, it has not had legal counsel undertake a detailed analysis of case law that might apply to defer or avoid application of a bar to such claims; thus, if rescission claims are made for those assumed to be barred by a statute of limitations and such claims are contested by the Company, until such affirmative defenses are ruled upon by judge in a proceeding adjudicating the rights at issue, no assurances can be made that, if asserted, such defenses would actually bar the rescission claims in these states. The Company has considered methods to offer to rescind the previous investment purchase or subscription by persons who acquired or subscribed for such investments during the period April 15, 2008 to February 18, 2011, but is not actually pursuing any such methods. If future circumstances warrant, the Company may commence a rescission offer to give each investor the opportunity to rescind or not rescind their investment (if not already sold) or subscription agreements or by certain shareholders between April 15, 2008 to February 18, 2011. Any rescission offer could address all or part of the Company’s rescission liability relating to its federal and state securities laws compliance issues by allowing the investors covered by the rescission offer to rescind the underlying securities transactions and sell those back to the Company or recover funding provided with subscription agreements, as the case may be. The Company entered into a seven year Personal Services Agreement on August 4, 2008 (the “Personal Services Agreement “), with Nader Pourhassan pursuant to which compensation was paid or accrued in view of a subsequent determination that these payments violated applicable securities laws. Such violations gave rise to the Company’s rescission obligation reflected in the Consolidated Financial Statements. It was unclear whether the Company had any defenses to payment, whether the Company had any rights to recover payments made to Mr. Pourhassan or 52 Table of Contents CYTODYN INC. (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF MAY 31, 2012 others at his direction or as contemplated in the Personal Services Agreement (including payments in the form of securities); or whether, even if the Company does have such rights, Mr. Pourhassan (and perhaps others) would have certain equitable remedies that would entitle Mr. Pourhassan (and perhaps others) to set off against the Company’s rights or would obligate the Company to make compensatory payments for services performed by Mr. Pourhassan (and others under his direction). The Personal Services Agreement provided for compensation to Dr. Pourhassan at an annual salary of $200,000. Additionally, as incentive compensation, Dr. Pourhassan’s personal assistant and one additional person were to receive 50,000 common shares each of the Company stock for every $500,000 in capital received by the Company through Dr. Pourhassan’s efforts. On October 11, 2011, Dr. Pourhassan and the Company entered into a Mutual Release and Personal Services Termination Agreement (the “MRPSTA”) which relieves the Company of liability for any claims of compensation under the Personal Services Agreement. Simultaneously, with the signing of the MRPSTA, Dr. Pourhassan and the Company entered into a new Employment and Non-Compete Agreement whereby Dr. Pourhassan will serve as Managing Director of Business Development at an annual salary of $225,000. The Company had been accruing stock compensation and deferred offering costs related to the Personal Services Agreement as described above. Upon the signing of the MRPSTA, the Company at May 31, 2011 reversed all related accrued stock compensation and deferring offering costs, as the Company currently has no further obligations under the Personal Services Agreement. 4 - Convertible Instruments During fiscal year 2010 the Company authorized the issuance of 400,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (Series B) at $5.00 per share. During the period ended May 31, 2012, 212,900 shares of the Series B were converted into 2,129,000 shares of common stock. The Series B is convertible into ten shares of the Company’s common stock including any accrued dividend, with an effective fixed conversion price of $0.50 per share. The holders of the Series B can only convert their shares to common shares provided the Company has sufficient authorized common shares at the time of conversion. Accordingly, the conversion option was contingent upon the Company increasing their authorized common shares, which occurred April 2010 when the Company’s shareholders approved an increase to the authorized shares. At the commitment date, which occurred upon the shareholders approving the increase in the authorized shares, the conversion option related to the Series B was beneficial. The intrinsic value of the conversion option at the commitment date resulted in a constructive dividend to the Series B holders of approximately $6,000,000. The constructive dividend increased and decreased additional paid- in capital by the same amount. The Series B has liquidation preferences over the common share holders at $5.00 per share plus any accrued dividends. Dividends are payable to the Series B holders when declared by the board of directors at the rate of $0.25 per share per annum. Such dividends are cumulative and accrue whether or not declared and whether or not there are any profits, surplus or other funds or assets of the Company legally available therefore. The Series B holders have no voting rights. 53 Table of Contents CYTODYN INC. (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF MAY 31, 2012 5 - Stock Options and Warrants The Company has one stock-based equity plan at May 31, 2012. Pursuant to the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan as amended (the “Plan”), which was originally adopted by the Company’s shareholders in 2005, the Company was authorized to issue options and warrants to purchase up to 7,600,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. As of May 31, 2012 the Company had 3,941,500 shares available for future stock option grants under the Plan. The estimated fair value of options and warrants is determined using the Black-Scholes option valuation model with the following weighted- average assumptions for the periods ended May 31, 2012 and 2011: Risk free rate Dividend yield Volatility Expected term 2012 0.12% - 0.87% — 93% - 102% 1-4 years 2011 0.74% — 106% 6.25 years Net cash proceeds from the exercise of stock options and warrants were approximately $327,000 and $0 for the periods ended May 31, 2012 and May 31, 2011, respectively. Compensation expense related to stock options and warrants was approximately $1,692,000, and $952,000 for the periods ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. During 2012 and 2011, the Company granted 3,416,088 and 550,000 options to employees, consultants and directors, which were valued and recorded as compensation expense above. Additionally, the Company granted 40,000 and 0 of warrants in conjunction with the issuance of common stock. All options and warrants granted during 2012 and 2011 were granted outside of the Plan. The grant date fair value of options and warrants vested during the periods ended May 31, 2012 and 2011 was approximately $1,562,000 and $895,000, respectively. The weighted average grant date fair value of options and warrants granted during the periods ended May 31, 2012 and 2011 was $1.44 and $0.97 respectively. As of May 31, 2012, there was approximately $5,039,000 of unrecognized compensation costs related to share-based payments for unvested options, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.31 years. 54 Table of Contents CYTODYN INC. (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF MAY 31, 2012 The following table represents stock option and warrants activity for the periods ended May 31, 2012 and 2011: Options and warrants outstanding - May 31, 2010 Granted Exercised Forfeited/expired/cancelled Options and warrants outstanding - May 31, 2011 Granted Exercised Forfeited/expired/cancelled Options and warrants outstanding May 31, 2012 Exercisable - May 31, 2012 Number of Shares 7,660,176 550,000 (18,000) (718,600) 7,473,576 3,456,088 (527,500) (74,500) 10,327,664 6,627,649 Weighted Average Exercise Price 1.42 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1.19 1.20 2.13 1.34 2.04 0.62 2.49 1.60 1.42 Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life 5.41 — — — 3.84 — — — 3.20 2.86 Aggregate Intrinsic Value 2,761,129 — — — 10,495,913 — 1,147,425 — 2,308,279 2,207,529 6 - Stock issued for services and cash On November 14, 2011, the Board approved a private placement to sell up to 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, no par value, at a price of $1.50 per share. During the three months ended February 29, 2012, 1,997,388 shares were sold for proceeds totaling approximately $2,996,000. During the fiscal year ended May 31, 2012, the Company issued 72,500 shares of common stock at $2.80 per share to consultants for past services, and recognized $203,000 of stock-based compensation based on the fair market value of the Company’s stock price at the commitment date for the services. During the fiscal year ended May 31, 2012, the Company issued 16,675 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $2.00 to $2.71 per share to directors for past services, and recognized approximately $35,000 in stock-based compensation. 7 - Recent Accounting Pronouncements Recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its EITF), the AICPA, and the SEC did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company’s present or future financial statements. 55 Table of Contents 8 - Income Taxes CYTODYN INC. (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF MAY 31, 2012 Deferred taxes are recorded for all existing temporary differences in the Company’s assets and liabilities for income tax and financial reporting purposes. Due to the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets, as noted below, there was no net deferred tax benefit or expense for the periods ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, and for the period ended October 28, 2003 through May 31, 2012. Reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate of 34 percent to the effective income tax rate is as follows for all periods presented: Income tax provision at statutory rate State income taxes, net Rate change Other Valuation allowance 2012 2011 34.0% 5.1 0.0 0.0 (39.1) 0.0% 34.0% 5.1 5.3 3.6 (48.0) 0.0% Net deferred tax assets and liabilities are comprised of the following as of May 31, 2012 and 2011: Deferred tax asset (liability) current: Accrued salary and expenses Warrant amortization Valuation allowance Deferred tax asset (liability) non-current Net operating loss Expense on non-qualified stock options and OID amortization Other Valuation allowance 2012 2011 $ $ 49,100 — (49,100) -0- $ $ 10,500 (800) (9,700) -0- $ 6,317,000 $ 4,112,700 2,093,100 96,500 $(8,506,600) -0- $ 1,450,000 58,000 $(5,620,700) -0- $ The tax benefit for the period presented is offset by a valuation allowance established against deferred tax assets arising from operating losses and other temporary differences, the realization of which could not be considered more likely than not. In future periods, tax benefits and related tax deferred assets will be recognized when management considers realization of such amounts to be more likely than not. 56 Table of Contents CYTODYN INC. (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF MAY 31, 2012 At May 31, 2012, the Company had available net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $16,000,000 which expire beginning in 2022. 9 - Commitments and Contingencies During the fiscal year ended May 31, 2012, the Company entered into employment agreements with three executives. The salaries for the executives range from $200,000 to $398,000 for fiscal year 2012, and each executive is reviewed annually for renewal of the agreement and salary merit increases. Bonuses for two of the executives are discretionary based on Board approval, and may range between 25 and 50 percent of the executives’ salaries. Additionally, one executive has an incentive bonus based upon achievement of certain targeted annual performance goals to be recommended by the Company’s compensation committee and approval of the Company’s Board. Pursuant to the employment agreements, during fiscal year 2012, the Company granted 2,900,000 common stock options at an exercise price of $2.00 per share. The options vest over four years, and expire five years from the date of grant. Subsequent to May 31, 2012, the Company entered into a Transition Agreement with Kenneth J. Van Ness, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) (see Note 11 below). On or about December 22, 2011, William Carmichael and Mojdeh Javadi (the “Plaintiffs”) filed a complaint against the Company in the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for the County of Clackamas, alleging breach of contract. The Plaintiffs allege that the Company entered into a contract with the Plaintiffs in November 2007, then breached the terms of the contract by failing to issue warrants to the Plaintiffs entitling them to purchase shares of the Company’s stock (the “Breach of Contract” claims). The Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint against the Company on May 11, 2012 in which they assert three additional claims each and amend the relief requested. In addition to the Breach of Contract claims, Plaintiffs allege in their Amended Complaint that: (i) they are third-party beneficiaries of a promise made by the Company to Nader Pourhassan in a Personal Services Agreement (the “Personal Services Agreement”), dated August 4, 2008 (the “Third Party Beneficiary” claims), (ii) they provided services to the Company and are entitled to the reasonable value for such services (the “Quantum Meruit” claims), and (iii) in reliance on the promises made in the Personal Services Agreement, the Company induced them to provide services to the Company and they are entitled to compensation for damages resulting from their reliance on those promises (the “Promissory Estoppel” claims). The Quantum Meruit and Promissory Estoppel claims are alternative claims to their Third Party Beneficiary claims. On the Breach of Contract claims, the Plaintiffs seek either compensatory damages in an amount not less than $750,000 each or the delivery of warrants to each Plaintiff to purchase 375,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for $0.25 per share. With respect to the Third Party Beneficiary claims, the Plaintiffs seek a judgment requiring the Company to deliver 650,000 shares of its common stock to each Plaintiff. With respect to the Quantum Meruit claims, Plaintiffs seek compensatory damages in an amount equal 57 Table of Contents CYTODYN INC. (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF MAY 31, 2012 to the reasonable value of their services to the Company. With respect to the Promissory Estoppel claims, the Plaintiffs seek compensation for damages resulting from their reliance on the Company’s promises. The Plaintiffs also seek prejudgment interest, plus costs and disbursements incurred in the litigation. The Company filed an answer to the complaint on February 15, 2012. An answer to the Amended Complaint was filed on May 21, 2012. On July 27, 2012, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release (the “Settlement Agreement”) with the above Plaintiffs. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the Company issued 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (“Shares”) to each of the Plaintiffs, for an aggregate total of 400,000 Shares. In addition, the Company issued warrants (“Warrants”) to purchase up to 375,000 Shares to each of the Plaintiffs, for an aggregate total of 750,000 Warrants. The Warrants are immediately exercisable at $0.25 per Share and shall expire on August 15, 2012. The Company issued the Shares and the Warrants to the Plaintiffs in exchange for their full and complete release of any and all claims against the Company as of July 27, 2012. Pursuant to and in accordance with the Settlement Agreement, on July 30, 2012, the Plaintiffs also dismissed with prejudice and without any award of costs, disbursements or attorney’s fees, their Amended Complaint against the Company filed in the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for the County of Clackamas. As of May 31, 2012, the Company recognized approximately $540,000 and $388,000 of compensation expense related to the Warrant grant, and the issuance of the Shares, respectively. In addition, from time to time, the Company is involved in claims and suits that arise in the ordinary course of business. Management currently believes that resolving any such claims against the Company will not have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial position or results of operations. 10 - Related Party Transactions Prior to 2011, a director provided legal services to the Company for several years. As of May 31, 2012 the Company still owed the director $19,493 and it is included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements as “indebtedness to related parties” as of May 31, 2012. The amount has been classified as short-term, as the Company’s intention is to pay the note completely in the next twelve months. As of May 31, 2012 the note is past due. In May and July 2007, the Company issued $150,000 in promissory notes with a stated interest rate of 14% to a director of the Company. These notes are currently past due. As of May 31, 2012, the balance in the notes is $55,000. The Company has classified the balance as short- term obligation as of May 31, 2012, as the Company’s intention is to pay the note completely in the next twelve months. The Company uses on an at-will basis a portion of a building owned by an affiliate of Kenneth J. Van Ness, our President and Chief Executive Officer, our principal offices that are located at 110 Crenshaw Lake Road, Lutz, Florida 33548. The Company uses approximately 1,600 square feet on a month-to-month basis at a rent of $1,650 per month, plus sales tax and utility reimbursement. 58 Table of Contents CYTODYN INC. (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF MAY 31, 2012 The above terms and amounts are not necessarily indicative of the terms and amounts that would have been incurred had comparable transactions been entered into with independent parties. 11 - Subsequent Events On July 25, 2012, the Company and Kenneth J. Van Ness entered into a Transition Agreement (the “Transition Agreement”). Pursuant to the Transition Agreement, Mr. Van Ness stepped down as the Chairman of the Board, effective immediately. In addition, Mr. Van Ness will step down as the President and CEO of the Company, effective no later than October 16, 2012 (the “Separation Date”). Mr. Van Ness will continue to serve as a director on the Board and Gregory A. Gould, a current member of the Board, will serve as the Chairman of the Board. The Transition Agreement provides that, in lieu of any compensation otherwise payable to Mr. Van Ness under the Executive Employment Agreement, dated April 16, 2012, but effective as of August 9, 2011 (the “Employment Agreement”), by and among the Company and Mr. Van Ness, during the period beginning on July 18, 2012 through October 16, 2012 (the “Transition Period”) Mr. Van Ness will be paid a salary equal to $13,890 per month and will continue to receive, during the Transition Period, the fringe benefits, indemnification and miscellaneous business expense benefits provided for in the Employment Agreement. Mr. Van Ness is also entitled to (i) receive a cash severance payment equal to $13,890 per month for 33 months after the Separation Date, (ii) the opportunity to elect the timing of distribution of his account balance in the Company’s 401(k) plan, (iii) reimbursement for continuing health care insurance coverage under COBRA for nine months, and (iv) all amounts due by the Company to an affiliate of Mr. Van Ness for every month that the Company continues to occupy a portion of the real property owned by an affiliate of Mr. Van Ness located at 110 Crenshaw Lake Road, Lutz, Florida. The Transition Agreement also provides that: (i)(A) the CytoDyn Inc. Stock Option Award Agreement, dated December 6, 2010, by and among the Company and Mr. Van Ness is amended to provide for immediate vesting of all of the 500,000 options granted at $1.19 per share, and (B) the CytoDyn Inc. Stock Option Award Agreement, dated April 16, 2012, but effective as of August 9, 2011, by and among the Company and Mr. Van Ness is amended to provide for (I) immediate vesting of 750,000 of the 1,500,000 options granted at $2.00 per share, and (II) forfeiture of the remaining 750,000 of the 1,500,000 options granted at $2.00 per share; (ii) Mr. Van Ness agreed to shorten the expiration date of the 25,000 options granted to him on September 22, 2010, the Company and Mr. Van Ness agreed that the expiration date for exercise of such options is August 8, 2016, although the Company amended the grants to waive the earlier expiration of such options if Mr. Van Ness no longer is in “Continuous Service” with the Company as that term is defined in the Company’s Stock Incentive Plan. 59 Table of Contents CYTODYN INC. (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF MAY 31, 2012 Effective July 25, 2012, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) with Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Progenics”) to acquire from Progenics its proprietary HIV viral-entry inhibitor drug candidate PRO 140 (“PRO 140”), a humanized anti-CCR5 monoclonal antibody, as well as certain other related assets, including the existing inventory of bulk PRO 140 drug product, intellectual property, certain related licenses and sublicenses, and United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) regulatory filings. The terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement provide for an initial cash payment of $3,500,000, as well as the following milestone payments and royalties: (i) $1,500,000 at the time of the first dosing in a US Phase III trial or non-US equivalent; (ii) $5,000,000 at the time of the first US new drug application approval by the FDA or other non-US approval for the sale of PRO 140; and (iii) royalty payments of up to five percent (5%) on net sales during the period beginning on the date of the first commercial sale of PRO 140 until the later of (a) the expiration of the last to expire patent included in the acquired assets, and (b) 10 years following the first commercial sale of PRO 140, in each case determined on a country-by-country basis. The closing is expected to take place within 90 days of the effective date, but is subject to the satisfaction of a number of closing conditions, including, among other matters: (i) Progenics having received all required authorizations, consents and approvals of government authorities; (ii) Progenics having entered into and delivered intellectual property assignments; (iii) the Company and Progenics having entered into a transition services agreement; (iv) the Company having obtained the financing and raising of capital it needs in order to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement; and (v) the Company having completed and been satisfied with its continuing due diligence investigation of PRO 140. 60 Table of Contents Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure None. Item 9A. Controls and Procedures. Disclosure Controls and Procedures As of May 31, 2012, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, management has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operations of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of May 31, 2012 as a result of the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting discussed below. Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the Company’s transactions; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary for preparation of our financial statements and that receipts and expenditures of the Company’s assets are made in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of the Company’s financial statements would be prevented or detected. Our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2012 using the criteria set forth in the Internal Control over Financial Reporting - Guidance for Smaller Public Companies issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based upon the evaluation, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of May 31, 2012 because of material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. A material weakness is a control deficiency that results in a more than remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of their assigned functions. Our 61 Table of Contents management concluded that the Company has several material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting because of inadequate segregation of duties over authorization, review and recording of transactions as well as the financial reporting of such transactions. Due to the Company’s limited resources, management has not developed a plan to mitigate the above material weaknesses. Despite the existence of these material weaknesses, the Company believes the financial information presented herein is materially correct and in accordance with the generally accepted accounting principles. This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report. Changes in Control Over Financial Reporting No change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting occurred during the year ended May 31, 2012, that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Item 9B. Other Information. None. PART III Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance. The information required by Item 10 relating to our directors, executive officers and corporate governance is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement for the 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of May 31, 2012. We have adopted a Code of Ethics for our Senior Executive Officers (the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Controller (or persons performing similar functions)), as well as a Code of Business Conduct and an Insider Trading Policy for the Company. These can all be found on our website at www.cytodyn.com. Item 11. Executive Compensation The information required by Item 11 relating to executive compensation is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement for the 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of May 31, 2012. Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters The information required by Item 12 relating to security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholders matters is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement for the 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of May 31, 2012. 62 Table of Contents See the table in “Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities” above for our Equity Compensation Plan Information as of May 31, 2012. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence The information required by Item 13 relating to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement for the 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of May 31, 2012. Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services The information required by Item 14 relating to principal accountant fees and services is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement for the 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of May 31, 2012. PART IV Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: 1. Consolidated Financial Statements See the Consolidated Financial Statements starting on page 24. 2. Exhibits The exhibits listed in the Exhibit Index, which appears immediately following the signature page and is incorporated herein by reference, and filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 63 Table of Contents Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. SIGNATURES Date: August 21, 2012 Date: August 21, 2012 CYTODYN INC. By: /s/ Kenneth J. Van Ness Kenneth J. Van Ness President and Chief Executive Officer, Director By: /s/ Andrew T. Libby, Jr. Andrew T. Libby, Jr. Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934 this Annual Report on Form 10-K was signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates stated. Date: August 21, 2012 Date: August 21, 2012 Date: August 21, 2012 Date: August 21, 2012 By: /s/ Gregory A. Gould, CPA Gregory A. Gould, CPA Chairman of the Board of Directors By: /s/ Ronald J. Tropp, Esq. Ronald J. Tropp, Esq. Director By: /s/ Jordan Naydenov Jordan Naydenov Director By: /s/ Anthony D. Caracciolo Anthony D. Caracciolo Director 64 Table of Contents Exhibit Number EXHIBITS INDEX Description Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 2.1 10.1 10.2 10.3 Rexray Articles of Incorporation shell company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 on Form 10SB12G Registration of Securities for Small Business Issuers filed July 11, 2002). Amended and Restated Bylaws (incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 3.1 filed with Form 8-K Current Report filed November 10, 2011). Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation changing company name from Rexray to CytoDyn Inc., and effective a one for two reverse split of its common shares (incorporated herein by reference to filed Exhibit 3.2 on Current Form 8-K filed November 12, 2003). Amendment to Articles of Incorporation dated September 2009 designating CytoDyn Inc.’s preferred Series B non-voting shares sold in a private placement. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to Form 10-K filed March 12, 2010). Amendment to Articles of Incorporation dated April 24, 2010 increasing the number of authorized shares to 100,000,000 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.5 on Current Form 8-K filed April 29, 2010). Plan of Acquisition Acquisition Agreement for reverse merger acquisition of shell company by CytoDyn of New Mexico Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 with Current Form 8-K/A filed January 12, 2004). Material Contracts Patent License Agreement between Allen D. Allen and CytoDyn of New Mexico Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 with Form 10-KSB, Annual Report for Small Business Issuers filed September 14, 2004). Amendment to Patent License Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6.1 filed with Form SB-2/A Registration of Securities for Small Business Issuer filed March 21, 2005). Exclusive License Agreement between Advanced Genetic Technologies, Inc. And The CBR Institute for Biomedical Research Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 filed with Current Form 8-K filed February 5, 2007). 65 Table of Contents Exhibit Number 10.4 10.5 10.6 10.7 10.8 10.9 10.10 10.11* 10.12* 10.13 Description Legal Settlement between CytoDyn of New Mexico Inc., Officers Allen D. Allen and Corinne Allen and CytoDyn Inc on the one hand and Maya LLC, Rex Lewis, and AIDS Research LLC on the other hand entered into December 2008. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Form 10-K filed March 12, 2010). Clinical Trial Agreement between The General Hospital Corporation d/b/a Massachusetts General Hospital and CytoDyn Inc., entered into September 28, 2009 for conducting clinical trials using Cytolin (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of CytoDyn Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 29, 2009). ® Amendment Number 1 to the Clinical Trial Agreement between The General Hospital Corporation d/b/a Massachusetts General Hospital and CytoDyn Inc., entered into October 14, 2009 (incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 10.7 filed with Form 10- K/A Annual Report filed August 5, 2011). Amendment Number 2 to the Clinical Trial Agreement between The General Hospital Corporation d/b/a Massachusetts General Hospital and CytoDyn Inc., entered into December 1, 2009 (incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 10.8 filed with Form 10- K/A Annual Report filed August 5, 2011). Amendment Number 3 to the Clinical Trial Agreement between The General Hospital Corporation d/b/a Massachusetts General Hospital and CytoDyn Inc., entered into March 1, 2010 (incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 10.9 filed with Form 10-K/A Annual Report filed August 5, 2011). Amendment Number 4 to the Clinical Trial Agreement between The General Hospital Corporation d/b/a Massachusetts General Hospital and CytoDyn Inc., entered into December 7, 2010 (incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 10.1 filed with Form 10- Q Current Report filed October 7, 2011). Amendment Number 5 to the Clinical Trial Agreement between The General Hospital Corporation d/b/a Massachusetts General Hospital and CytoDyn Inc., entered into May 20, 2011 (incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 10.10 filed with Form 10-K Annual Report filed November 3, 2011). CytoDyn Inc., 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 10.10 filed with Form 10-K/A Annual Report filed August 5, 2011). CytoDyn Inc., 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan (incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 10.11 filed with Form 10-K/A Annual Report filed August 5, 2011). Research Funding and Option Agreement dated November 5, 2011 (incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 10.1 filed with Form 8-K Current Report filed November 16, 2011). 66 Table of Contents Exhibit Number 10.14* Executive Employment Agreement dated April 16, 2012 but effective as of August 9, 2011 (incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 10.1 filed with Form 8-K Current Report filed April 20, 2012). Description 21.1 Subsidiaries Other Certifications 31.1 31.2 32.1 32.2 Certification by CEO Certification by CFO Certification of CEO pursuant to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted, pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Certification of CFO pursuant to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted, pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 XBRL 101.INS XBRL Instance Document ** 101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document ** 101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document ** 101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document** 101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document ** 101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document ** * Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement ** These interactive data files shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability under those sections. 67 Name Advanced Genetic Technologies, Inc. CytoDyn Veterinary Medicine LLC Subsidiaries Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization Florida Florida Exhibit 21.1 Exhibit 31.1 I, Kenneth J. Van Ness, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of CytoDyn Inc.; Certification of Chief Executive Officer 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a- 15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. Date: August 21, 2012 /s/ Kenneth J. Van Ness Kenneth J. Van Ness President and Chief Executive Officer Exhibit 31.2 I, Andrew T. Libby, Jr., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of CytoDyn Inc.; Certification of the Chief Financial Officer 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a- 15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. Date: August 21, 2012 /s/ Andrew T. Libby, Jr. Andrew T. Libby, Jr. Chief Financial Officer Exhibit 32.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of CytoDyn Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-K “), I, Kenneth J. Van Ness, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and (2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: August 21, 2012 /s/ Kenneth J. Van Ness Kenneth J. Van Ness President and Chief Executive Officer Exhibit 32.2 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of CytoDyn Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-K “), I, Andrew T. Libby, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and (2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: August 21, 2012 /s/ Andrew T. Libby, Jr. Andrew T. Libby, Jr. Chief Financial Officer 

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above