Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
☒
☐
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2019
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Transition Period From to
Commission File No. 001-32472
DAWSON GEOPHYSICAL COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
74-2095844
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
508 West Wall, Suite 800, Midland, Texas 79701
(Address of Principal Executive Office) (Zip Code)
Registrant’s Telephone Number, including area code: 432-684-3000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class
Common Stock, $0.01 par value
Trading Symbol(s)
DWSN
Name of Exchange on Which Registered
The NASDAQ Stock Market
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T (§ 232 405 of the chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes
☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an
emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-
2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ☐
Accelerated filer ☒
Non-accelerated filer ☐
Smaller reporting company ☒
Emerging growth company ☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or
revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
As of June 28, 2019, the aggregate market value of Dawson Geophysical Company common stock, par value $0.01 per share, held by non-affiliates (based upon
the closing transaction price on Nasdaq) was approximately $54,112,000.
On March 4, 2020, there were 23,287,410 shares of Dawson Geophysical Company common stock, $0.01 par value outstanding.
As used in this report, the terms “we,” “our,” “us,” “Dawson” and the “Company” refer to Dawson Geophysical Company unless the context indicates
otherwise.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for its 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Table of Contents
Business
Item 1.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
Properties
Legal Proceedings
Mine Safety Disclosures
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
PART II
Market for Our Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
Selected Financial Data
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 8.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Item 9.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Item 9B. Other Information
Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.
PART III
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Executive Compensation
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Item 15.
Index to Exhibits
Signatures
Index to Financial Statements
PART IV
1
Page
3
6
15
15
16
16
16
19
19
27
28
28
28
29
29
29
29
29
29
30
31
35
F‑1
Table of Contents
DAWSON GEOPHYSICAL COMPANY
FORM 10‑K
For the Year Ended December 31, 2019
DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD‑LOOKING STATEMENTS
Statements other than statements of historical fact included in this Form 10‑K that relate to forecasts, estimates or
other expectations regarding future events, including without limitation, statements under “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Business” regarding technological advancements and our
financial position, business strategy, and plans and objectives of our management for future operations, may be deemed to
be forward‑looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). When used in this Form 10‑K, words such as “anticipate,”
“believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend” and similar expressions, as they relate to us or our management, identify
forward‑looking statements. Such forward‑looking statements are based on the beliefs of our management, as well as
assumptions made by and information currently available to management. Actual results could differ materially from those
contemplated by the forward‑looking statements as a result of certain factors, including, but not limited to, dependence
upon energy industry spending; the volatility of oil and natural gas prices; changes in economic conditions; the potential for
contract delays; reductions or cancellations of service contracts; limited number of customers; credit risk related to our
customers; reduced utilization; high fixed costs of operations and high capital requirements; operational disruptions;
industry competition; external factors affecting the Company’s crews such as weather interruptions and inability to obtain
land access rights of way; whether the Company enters into turnkey or day rate contracts; crew productivity; the
availability of capital resources; and disruptions in the global economy. See “Risk Factors” for more information on these
and other factors. These forward‑looking statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and are subject
to these and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions relating to our operations, results of operations, growth strategies
and liquidity. The cautionary statements made in this Form 10‑K should be read as applying to all related forward‑looking
statements wherever they appear in this Form 10‑K. All subsequent written and oral forward‑looking statements
attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by this paragraph. We assume no
obligation to update any such forward‑looking statements.
2
Table of Contents
Item 1. BUSINESS
General
Part I
Dawson Geophysical Company, a Texas corporation (the “Company”), is a leading provider of North American
onshore seismic data acquisition services with operations throughout the continental United States (“U.S.”) and Canada.
We acquire and process 2‑D, 3‑D and multi‑component seismic data for our clients, ranging from major oil and gas
companies to independent oil and gas operators as well as providers of multi‑client data libraries. Our principal business
office is located at 508 West Wall, Suite 800, Midland, Texas 79701 (Telephone: 432‑684‑3000), and our internet address is
www.dawson3d.com. We make available free of charge on our website our annual reports on Form 10‑K, quarterly reports
on Form 10‑Q, and current reports on Form 8‑K as soon as reasonably practicable after filing or furnishing such
information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
On February 11, 2015, the Company, which was formerly known as TGC Industries, Inc. (“Legacy TGC”),
consummated a strategic business combination with Dawson Operating Company, which was formerly known as Dawson
Geophysical Company (“Legacy Dawson”), pursuant to which a wholly‑owned subsidiary of Legacy TGC merged with
and into Legacy Dawson, with Legacy Dawson continuing after the merger as the surviving entity and a wholly‑owned
subsidiary of Legacy TGC (the “Merger”). In connection with the Merger, Legacy Dawson changed its name to “Dawson
Operating Company” and Legacy TGC changed its name to “Dawson Geophysical Company.” Legacy TGC was formed in
1980. Legacy Dawson was formed in 1952.
Except as otherwise specifically noted herein, references herein to the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our” refer to
post‑combination Dawson Geophysical Company and its consolidated subsidiaries, including Legacy Dawson.
We provide our seismic data acquisition services primarily to providers of multi‑client data libraries for use in the
onshore drilling and production of oil and natural gas in the continental U.S. and Canada, as well as directly to onshore oil
and natural gas exploration and development companies. The main factors influencing demand for seismic data acquisition
services in our industry are the level of drilling and completion activity by oil and natural gas companies and the size of
such companies’ exploration and development budgets, which, in turn, depend largely on current and anticipated future
crude oil and natural gas prices and production levels and depletion rates of the companies’ oil and natural gas reserves.
Our seismic crews supply seismic data primarily to companies engaged in the exploration and development of oil
and natural gas on land and in land‑to‑water transition areas. Seismic acquisition services of our wholly‑owned subsidiary,
Eagle Canada Seismic Services, ULC (“Eagle Canada”), are also used by the potash mining industry in Canada, and Eagle
Canada has particular expertise through its heliportable capabilities. Our clients rely on seismic data to identify areas where
subsurface conditions are favorable for the accumulation of existing hydrocarbons, to optimize the development and
production of hydrocarbon reservoirs, to better delineate existing oil and natural gas fields, and to augment reservoir
management techniques. In addition, seismic data are sometimes utilized in unconventional reservoirs to identify geo-
hazards (such as subsurface faults) for drilling purposes, aid in geo-steering of a horizontal well bore and rock property
identification for high grading of well locations and hydraulic fracturing. The majority of our current activity is in areas of
unconventional reservoirs.
We acquire geophysical data using the latest in 3‑D seismic survey techniques. We introduce acoustic energy into
the ground by using vibration equipment or dynamite detonation, depending on the surface terrain, area of operation, and
subsurface requirements. The reflected energy, or echoes, are received through geophones, converted into a digital signal at
a multi‑channel recording unit, and then transmitted to a central recording vehicle. Subsurface requirements dictate the
number of channels necessary to perform our services. We generally use tens of thousands of recording channels in our 3-D
seismic surveys. Additional recording channels enhance the resolution of the seismic survey through increased imaging
analysis and provide improved operational efficiencies for our clients. With our state‑of‑the‑art seismic equipment,
including computer technology and multiple channels, we acquire, on an efficient basis, immense volumes of seismic data
that, when processed and interpreted, produce precise images of the earth’s subsurface. Our clients then use our seismic
3
Table of Contents
data to generate 3‑D geologic models that help reduce drilling risks, finding and development costs, and improve recovery
rates from existing fields.
In addition to conventional 2‑D and 3‑D seismic surveys, we provide what the industry refers to as
multi‑component seismic data surveys. Multi‑component surveys involve the recording of alternative seismic waves known
as shear waves. Shear waves can be recorded as wave conversion of conventional energy sources (3‑C converted waves) or
from horizontal vibrator energy source units (shear wave vibrators). Multi‑component data are utilized in further analysis of
subsurface rock type, fabric and reservoir characterization. We own equipment required for onshore multi‑component
surveys. The majority of the projects in Canada require multi‑component recording equipment. We have operated one to
two multi‑component equipped crews in the U.S. routinely over the past few years. The use of multi‑component seismic
data could increase in North America over the next few years if industry conditions improve and potentially require capital
expenditures for additional equipment.
In recent years, we have begun providing surface‑recorded microseismic services utilizing equipment we own.
Microseismic monitoring is used by clients who use hydraulic fracturing to extract hydrocarbon deposits to monitor their
hydraulic fracturing operations.
We market and supplement our services in the continental U.S. from our headquarters in Midland, Texas and from
additional offices in three other cities in Texas (Denison, Houston and Plano) as well as two additional states, Oklahoma
(Oklahoma City) and Colorado (Denver). In addition, we market and supplement our services in Canada from our facilities
in Calgary, Alberta.
The Industry
Technological advances in seismic equipment and computing allow the seismic industry to acquire and process, on
an efficient basis, immense volumes of seismic data which produce precise images of the earth’s subsurface. The latest
accepted method of seismic data acquisition, processing, and the subsequent interpretation of the processed data is the 3‑D
seismic method. Geophysicists use computer workstations to interpret 3‑D data volumes, identify subsurface anomalies,
and generate a geologic model of subsurface features. In contrast with the 3‑D method, the 2‑D method involves the
collection of seismic data in a linear fashion, thus generating a single plane of subsurface seismic data. Over recent years,
the size of our surveys and density of recording channels and vibrator energy source units has increased resulting in an
increase in required recording channels and energy source units to perform such surveys.
3‑D seismic data are used in the exploration and development of new reserves and enable oil and natural gas
companies to better delineate existing fields and to augment their reservoir management techniques. Benefits of
incorporating high resolution 3‑D seismic surveys into exploration and development programs include reducing drilling
risk, decreasing oil and natural gas finding costs, and increasing the efficiencies of reservoir location, delineation, and
management. In order to meet the requirements necessary to fully realize the benefits of 3‑D seismic data, there is an
increasing demand for improved data quality with greater subsurface resolution with increased density of recording
channels and vibrator energy source units.
Currently, the North American seismic data acquisition industry is made up of a number of companies divided into
two groups. The first group is made up of publicly‑traded companies which includes us and SAExploration Holdings, Inc.
(“SAE”). The second group is made up of Echo Seismic Ltd. (“ECHO”), Breckenridge Geophysical Inc. (“Breckenridge”),
and Paragon Geophysical Services, Inc. (“Paragon”), along with smaller companies which generally run one or two small
channel count seismic crews and often specialize in specific regions or types of operations.
Equipment and Crews
In recent years, we have experienced continued increases in recording channel capacity and vibrator energy source
units on a per crew or project basis. This increase in channel count and energy source unit demand is driven by client needs
and is necessary in order to produce higher resolution images, increase crew efficiencies and undertake larger scale
projects. Due to the increase in demand for higher channel counts, we have continued our investments in additional
channels. In response to project‑based channel requirements, we routinely deploy a variable number of channels on a
variable number of crews in an effort to maximize asset utilization and meet client needs. While the number of recording
systems we own may exceed the number utilized in the field at any given time, we maintain the excess equipment to
provide additional operational flexibility and to allow us to quickly deploy additional recording channels and energy source
4
Table of Contents
units as needed to respond to client demand and desire for improved data quality with greater subsurface images. We
believe we will realize the benefit of increased channel counts and flexibility of deployment through increased crew
efficiencies, higher revenues and margins with improved conditions.
In recent years, we have purchased or leased a significant number of cableless recording channels. We utilize this
equipment primarily as stand‑alone recording systems. As a result of the introduction of cableless recording systems, we
have realized increased crew efficiencies and increased channels on projects using this equipment. We believe we will
experience continued demand for cableless recording systems and increased channel count in the future.
As of December 31, 2019, we operate 117 vibrator energy source units and approximately 268,000 recording
channels. The recording channels consist of 93,000 single-channel GSR boxes, 45,500 three-channel GSR boxes, 3,600
four-channel GSR boxes and 8,000 three-channel INOVA Hawk boxes. Each crew consists of approximately 40 to 100
technicians with associated vehicles, geophones, a seismic recording system, energy sources, cables, and a variety of other
equipment. The GSR and INOVA Hawk crews utilize a recorder to manage the data acquisition while the individual system
captures and holds the data until they are placed in the Data Transfer Module. The data is then transferred to various data
storage media, which are delivered to a data processing center selected by the client.
Equipment Acquisition and Capital Expenditures
We monitor and evaluate advances in geophysical technology and commit capital funds to purchase the equipment
we deem most effective to maintain our competitive position. Purchasing and updating seismic equipment and technology
involves a commitment to capital spending. We also tie our capital expenditures closely to demand for our services.
Beginning in 2014, we adopted a maintenance capital expenditures program due to the belief that our equipment base was
sufficient to meet current demand; however, our Board of Directors may increase the capital budget in response to strategic
opportunities to acquire seismic recording equipment. Our Board of Directors approved a maintenance capital expenditure
budget of $10,000,000 for 2019 of which we utilized $3,590,000 during the 12 months ended December 31, 2019. Our
Board of Directors has approved an initial maintenance capital expenditure budget of $5,000,000 for 2020.
Clients
Our services are marketed by supervisory and executive personnel who contact clients to determine geophysical
needs and respond to client inquiries regarding the availability of crews or processing schedules. These contacts are based
principally upon professional relationships developed over a number of years.
Our clients range from major oil and gas companies to small independent oil and gas operators and also providers
of multi‑client data libraries. The services we provide to our clients vary according to the size and needs of each client.
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2019, sales to four clients represented approximately 60% of our revenues.
We anticipate that sales to these clients will represent a smaller percentage of our overall revenues during 2020. The
remaining balance of our revenues were derived from varied clients and none represented 10% or more of our revenues.
We do not acquire seismic data for our own account or for future sale, maintain multi‑client seismic data libraries,
or participate in oil and gas ventures. The results of seismic surveys conducted for a client belong to that client. It is also
our policy that none of our officers, directors or employees actively participate in oil and natural gas ventures. All of our
clients’ information is maintained in the strictest confidence.
Domestic and Foreign Operations
We derive our revenue from domestic and foreign sources. Total revenues for the twelve months ended December
31, 2019 were approximately $145,773,000, of which $129,452,000 was earned in the U.S. and $16,321,000 was earned in
Canada. Total revenues for the twelve months ended December 31, 2018 were approximately $154,156,000, of which
$137,101,000 was earned in the U.S. and $17,055,000 was earned in Canada.
Net property and equipment as of December 31, 2019 was approximately $53,549,000, of which $45,653,000 was
located in the U.S. and $7,896,000 was located in Canada. Net right-of-use assets as of December 31, 2019 were
approximately $6,605,000, of which $5,893,000 was located in the U.S. and $712,000 was located in Canada. Net property
and equipment as of December 31, 2018 was approximately $71,541,000, of which $62,033,000 was located in the U.S.
and $9,508,000 was located in Canada.
5
Table of Contents
Contracts
Our contracts are obtained either through competitive bidding or as a result of client negotiations. Our services are
conducted under general service agreements for seismic data acquisition services which define certain obligations for us
and for our clients. A supplemental agreement setting forth the terms of a specific project, which may be canceled by either
party on short notice, is entered into for every project. We currently operate under supplemental agreements that are either
“turnkey” agreements providing for a fixed fee to be paid to us for each unit of data acquired or “term” agreements
providing for a fixed hourly, daily, or monthly fee during the term of the project or projects.
Currently, as in recent years, most of our projects are operated under turnkey agreements. Turnkey agreements
generally provide us more profit potential, but involve more risks because of the potential of crew downtime or operational
delays. We attempt to negotiate on a project‑by‑project basis some level of weather downtime protection within the turnkey
agreements. Under the term agreements, we forego an increased profit potential in exchange for a more consistent revenue
stream with improved protection from crew downtime or operational delays.
Competition
The acquisition of seismic data for the oil and natural gas industry is a highly competitive business. Contracts for
such services generally are awarded on the basis of price quotations, crew experience, and the availability of crews to
perform in a timely manner, although factors other than price, such as crew safety, performance history, and technological
and operational expertise, are often determinative. Our competition includes publicly traded competitors, such as SAE. Our
other major competitors include ECHO, Breckenridge, and Paragon. In addition to these previously named companies, we
also compete for projects from time to time with smaller seismic companies which operate in local markets with only one
or two small channel count crews. Further, the barriers to entry in the seismic industry are not prohibitive, and it would not
be difficult for seismic companies outside of the U.S. to enter the domestic market and compete with us.
Employees
As of December 31, 2019, we employed 455 full‑time employees, of which 72 consisted of management, sales,
and administrative personnel with the remainder being crew and crew support personnel. Our employees are not
represented by a labor union. We believe we have good relations with our employees.
See “Item 2. Properties” for a description of the material properties utilized in our business.
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS
An investment in our common stock is subject to a number of risks, including those discussed below. You should
carefully consider these discussions of risk and the other information included in this Form 10‑K. These risk factors could
affect our actual results and should be considered carefully when evaluating us. Although the risks described below are the
risks that we believe are material, they are not the only risks relating to our business, our industry and our common stock.
Additional risks and uncertainties, including those that are not yet identified or that we currently believe are immaterial,
may also adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. If any of the events described below
occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
We derive substantially all of our revenues from providers of multi-client data libraries and companies in the oil and
natural gas exploration and development industry. The oil and natural gas industry is a historically cyclical industry
with levels of activity that are significantly affected by the levels and volatility of oil and natural gas prices.
Demand for our services depends upon the level of expenditures by oil and natural gas companies for exploration,
production, development and field management activities, which depend primarily on oil and natural gas prices. Significant
fluctuations in domestic oil and natural gas exploration activities and commodity prices have affected, and will continue to
affect, demand for our services and our results of operations. We could be adversely impacted if the level of such
exploration activities and the prices for oil and natural gas were to significantly decline in the future. In addition to the
market prices of oil and natural gas, the willingness of our clients to explore, develop and produce depends largely upon
prevailing industry conditions that are influenced by numerous factors over which our management has no control,
including general economic conditions and the availability of credit. Any prolonged reduction in the overall level of
6
Table of Contents
exploration and development activities, whether resulting from changes in oil and natural gas prices or otherwise, could
adversely impact us in many ways by negatively affecting:
·
·
·
·
our revenues, cash flows, and profitability;
our ability to maintain or increase our borrowing capacity;
our ability to obtain additional capital to finance our business and the cost of that capital; and
our ability to attract and retain skilled personnel whom we would need in the event of an upturn in the
demand for our services.
Worldwide political, economic, and military events have contributed to oil and natural gas price volatility and are
likely to continue to do so in the future. Depending on the market prices of oil and natural gas, oil and natural gas
exploration and development companies may cancel or curtail their capital expenditure and drilling programs, thereby
reducing demand for our services, or may become unable to pay, or have to delay payment of, amounts owed to us for our
services. Oil and natural gas prices have been highly volatile historically and, we believe, will continue to be so in the
future. Many factors beyond our control affect oil and natural gas prices, including:
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
the cost of exploring for, producing, and delivering oil and natural gas;
the discovery rate of new oil and natural gas reserves;
the rate of decline of existing and new oil and natural gas reserves;
available pipeline and other oil and natural gas transportation capacity;
the ability of oil and natural gas companies to raise capital and debt financing;
actions by OPEC (the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries);
political instability in the Middle East and other major oil and natural gas producing regions;
economic conditions in the U.S. and elsewhere;
domestic and foreign tax policy;
domestic and foreign energy policy including increased emphasis on alternative sources of energy;
weather conditions in the U.S., Canada and elsewhere;
the pace adopted by foreign governments for the exploration, development, and production of their national
reserves;
the price of foreign imports of oil and natural gas; and
the overall supply and demand for oil and natural gas.
We, and our clients, may be adversely affected by an economic downturn.
An economic downturn could have a material adverse effect on our financial results and proposed plan of
operations and could lead to further significant fluctuations in the demand for and pricing of oil and gas. Reduced demand
and pricing pressures could adversely affect the financial condition and results of operations of our clients and their ability
to purchase our services. We are not able to predict the timing, extent, and duration of the economic cycles in the markets
in which we operate.
7
Table of Contents
A limited number of clients operating in a single industry account for a significant portion of our revenues, and the
loss of one of these clients could adversely affect our results of operations.
We derive a significant amount of our revenues from a relatively small number of oil and gas exploration and
development companies and providers of multi‑client data libraries. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2019,
our four largest clients accounted for approximately 60% of our revenues. If these clients, or any of our other significant
clients, were to terminate their contracts or fail to contract for our services in the future because they are acquired, alter
their exploration or development strategy, experience financial difficulties or for any other reason, our results of operations
could be adversely affected.
Our clients could delay, reduce or cancel their service contracts with us on short notice, which may lead to lower than
expected demand and revenues.
Our order book reflects client commitments at levels we believe are sufficient to maintain operations on our
existing crews for the indicated periods. However, our clients can delay, reduce or cancel their service contracts with us on
short notice. If the oil and natural gas industry incurs a downturn, it may result in an increase in delays, reductions or
cancellations by our clients. In addition, the timing of the origination and completion of projects and when projects are
awarded and contracted for is also uncertain. As a result, our order book as of any particular date may not be indicative of
actual demand and revenues for any succeeding period.
Our revenues, operating results and cash flows can be expected to fluctuate from period to period.
Our revenues, operating results and cash flows may fluctuate from period to period. These fluctuations are
attributable to the level of new business in a particular period, the timing of the initiation, progress or cancellation of
significant projects, higher revenues and expenses on our dynamite contracts, and costs we incur to train new crews we
may add in the future to meet increased client demand. Fluctuations in our operating results may also be affected by other
factors that are outside of our control such as permit delays, weather delays and crew productivity. Oil and natural gas
prices have continued to be volatile and have resulted in significant demand fluctuations for our services. There can be no
assurance of future oil and gas price levels or stability. Our operations in Canada are also seasonal as a result of the thawing
season and we have historically experienced limited Canadian activity during the second and third quarters of each year.
The demand for our services would be adversely affected by a significant reduction in oil and natural gas prices and by
climate change legislation or material changes to U.S. energy policy. Because our business has high fixed costs, the
negative effect of one or more of these factors could trigger wide variations in our operating revenues, cash flows,
EBITDA, margin, and profitability from quarter‑to‑quarter, rendering quarter‑to‑quarter comparisons unreliable as an
indicator of performance. Due to the factors discussed above, you should not expect sequential growth in our quarterly
revenues and profitability.
We extend credit to our clients without requiring collateral, and a default by a client could have a material adverse
effect on our operating revenues.
We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our clients’ financial conditions and, generally, require no collateral
from our clients. It is possible that one or more of our clients will become financially distressed, especially in light of the
recent downturn in the oil and natural gas industry and fluctuations in commodity prices, which could cause them to default
on their obligations to us and could reduce the client’s future need for seismic services provided by us. Our concentration of
clients may also increase our overall exposure to these credit risks. A default in payment from one of our large clients could
have a material adverse effect on our operating results for the period involved.
We incur losses.
We incurred net losses of $15,213,000 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2019 and $24,407,000 for the
twelve months ended December 31, 2018.
Our ability to be profitable in the future will depend on many factors beyond our control, but primarily on the
level of demand for land‑based seismic data acquisition services by oil and natural gas exploration and development
companies. Even if we do achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or
annual basis.
8
Table of Contents
The high fixed costs of our operations could result in continuing or increasing operating losses.
Companies within our industry are typically subject to high fixed costs which consist primarily of depreciation (a
non‑cash item) and maintenance expenses associated with seismic data acquisition and equipment and crew costs. In
addition, ongoing maintenance capital expenditures, as well as new equipment investment, can be significant. As a result,
any extended periods of significant downtime or low productivity caused by reduced demand, weather interruptions,
equipment failures, permit delays, or other causes could result in continuing or increasing operating losses.
We have indebtedness from time to time under credit facilities with a commercial bank, and certain of our accounts
receivable and restricted CDARS accounts are pledged as collateral for these obligations. Our ability to borrow may be
limited if our accounts receivable decreases.
From time to time, we may have indebtedness under credit facilities with a commercial bank. We maintain certain
restricted CDARS accounts with our commercial bank which can be used as collateral against future borrowings. If we are
unable to repay all secured borrowings when due, whether at maturity or if declared due and payable following a default,
our lenders have the right to proceed against the deposit pledged to secure the indebtedness and may liquidate the CDARS
account in order to repay those borrowings, which could materially harm our business, financial condition and results of
operations. Our ability to borrow funds under our revolving line of credit is tied to the value of our collateral account with
our commercial bank as well as the amount of our eligible accounts receivable. If our accounts receivable decrease
materially for any reason, including delays, reductions or cancellations by clients or decreased demand for our services, our
ability to borrow to fund operations or other obligations may be limited.
Our financial results could be adversely affected by asset impairments.
We periodically review our portfolio of equipment and our intangible assets for impairment. Future events,
including our financial performance, sustained decreases in oil and natural gas prices, reduced demand for our services, our
market valuation or the market valuation of comparable companies, loss of a significant client’s business, or strategic
decisions, could cause us to conclude that impairment indicators exist and ultimately that the asset values associated with
our equipment or our intangibles were to be impaired. If we were to impair our equipment or intangibles, these non-cash
asset impairments could negatively affect our financial results in a material manner in the period in which they are
recorded, and the larger the amount of any impairment that may be taken, the greater the impact such impairment may have
on our financial results.
Our profitability is determined, in part, by the utilization level and productivity of our crews and is affected by
numerous external factors that are beyond our control.
Our revenues are determined, in part, by the contract price we receive for our services, the level of utilization of
our data acquisition crews and the productivity of these crews. Crew utilization and productivity is partly a function of
external factors, such as client cancellation or delay of projects, operating delays from inclement weather, obtaining land
access rights and other factors, over which we have no control. If our crews encounter operational difficulties or delays on
any data acquisition survey, our results of operations may vary, and in some cases, may be adversely affected.
In recent years, most of our projects have been performed on a turnkey basis for which we were paid a fixed price
for a defined scope of work or unit of data acquired. The revenue, cost and gross profit realized under our turnkey contracts
can vary from our estimates because of changes in job conditions, variations in labor and equipment productivity or
because of the performance of our subcontractors. Turnkey contracts may also cause us to bear substantially all of the risks
of business interruption caused by external factors over which we may have no control, such as weather, obtaining land
access rights, crew downtime or operational delays. These variations, delays and risks inherent in turnkey contracts may
result in reducing our profitability.
We face intense competition in our business that could result in downward pricing pressure and the loss of market
share.
The seismic data acquisition services industry is a highly competitive business in the continental U.S. and Canada.
Additionally, the seismic data acquisition business is extremely price competitive and has a history of periods in which
seismic contractors bid jobs below cost and, therefore, adversely affected industry pricing. Many contracts are awarded on
a bid basis, which may further increase competition based primarily on price. Further, the barriers to entry in the seismic
9
Table of Contents
industry are not prohibitive, and it would not be difficult for seismic companies outside of the U.S. to enter the domestic
market and compete with us.
Inclement weather may adversely affect our ability to complete projects and could, therefore, adversely affect our
results of operations.
Our seismic data acquisition operations could be adversely affected by inclement weather conditions. Delays
associated with weather conditions could adversely affect our results of operations. For example, weather delays could
affect our operations on a particular project or an entire region and could lengthen the time to complete data acquisition
projects. In addition, even if we negotiate weather protection provisions in our contracts, we may not be fully compensated
by our clients for delays caused by inclement weather.
Our operations are subject to delays related to obtaining land access rights of way from third parties which could
affect our results of operations.
Our seismic data acquisition operations could be adversely affected by our inability to obtain timely right of way
usage from both public and private land and/or mineral owners. We cannot begin surveys on property without obtaining
permits from governmental entities as well as the permission of the private landowners who own the land being surveyed.
In recent years, it has become more difficult, costly and time‑consuming to obtain access rights of way as drilling activities
have expanded into more populated areas. Additionally, while landowners generally are cooperative in granting access
rights, some have become more resistant to seismic and drilling activities occurring on their property. In addition,
governmental entities do not always grant permits within the time periods expected. Delays associated with obtaining such
rights of way could negatively affect our results of operations.
Capital requirements for our operations are large. If we are unable to finance these requirements, we may not be able
to maintain our competitive advantage.
Seismic data acquisition and data processing technologies historically have progressed steadily, and we expect this
trend to continue. In order to remain competitive, we must continue to invest additional capital to maintain, upgrade and
expand our seismic data acquisition capabilities. Our working capital requirements remain high, primarily due to the
expansion of our infrastructure in response to client demand for cableless recording systems and more recording channels,
which has increased as the industry strives for improved data quality with greater subsurface resolution images. Our
sources of working capital are limited. We have historically funded our working capital requirements primarily with cash
generated from operations, cash reserves and, from time to time, borrowings from commercial banks. In recent years, we
have funded some of our capital expenditures through equipment term loans and finance leases. In the past, we have also
funded our capital expenditures and other financing needs through public equity offerings. If we were to expand our
operations at a rate exceeding operating cash flow, if current demand or pricing of geophysical services were to decrease
substantially, or if technical advances or competitive pressures required us to acquire new equipment faster than our cash
flow could sustain, additional financing could be required. If we were not able to obtain such financing or renew our
existing revolving line of credit when needed, our failure could have a negative impact on our ability to pursue expansion
and maintain our competitive advantage.
Technological change in our business creates risks of technological obsolescence and requirements for future capital
expenditures. If we are unable to keep up with these technological advances, we may not be able to compete effectively.
Seismic data acquisition technologies historically have steadily improved and progressed, and we expect this
progression to continue. We are in a capital intensive industry, and in order to remain competitive, we must continue to
invest additional capital to maintain, upgrade and expand our seismic data acquisition capabilities. However, we may have
limitations on our ability to obtain the financing necessary to enable us to purchase state‑of‑the‑art equipment, and certain
of our competitors may be able to purchase newer equipment when we may not be able to do so, thus affecting our ability
to compete.
We rely on a limited number of key suppliers for specific seismic services and equipment.
We depend on a limited number of third parties to supply us with specific seismic services and equipment. From
time to time, increased demand for seismic data acquisition services has decreased the available supply of new seismic
equipment, resulting in extended delivery dates on orders of new equipment. Any delay in obtaining equipment could
10
Table of Contents
delay our deployment of additional crews and restrict the productivity of existing crews, adversely affecting our business
and results of operations. In addition, any adverse change in the terms of our suppliers’ arrangements could affect our
results of operations.
Some of our suppliers may also be our competitors. If competitive pressures were to become such that our
suppliers would no longer sell to us, we would not be able to easily replace the technology with equipment that
communicates effectively with our existing technology, thereby impairing our ability to conduct our business.
We are dependent on our management team and key employees, and inability to retain our current team or attract
new employees could harm our business.
Our continued success depends upon attracting and retaining highly skilled professionals and other technical
personnel. A number of our employees are highly skilled scientists and highly trained technicians. The loss, whether by
death, departure or illness, of our senior executives or other key employees or our failure to continue to attract and retain
skilled and technically knowledgeable personnel could adversely affect our ability to compete in the seismic services
industry. We may experience significant competition for such personnel, particularly during periods of increased demand
for seismic services. A limited number of our employees are under employment contracts, and we have no key man
insurance.
We are subject to Canadian foreign currency exchange rate risk.
We conduct business in Canada which subjects us to foreign currency exchange rate risk. Currently, we do not
hold or issue foreign currency forward contracts, option contracts or other derivative financial instruments to mitigate the
currency exchange rate risk. Our results of operations and our cash flows could be impacted by changes in foreign currency
exchange rates.
Our common stock has experienced, and may continue to experience, price volatility and low trading volume.
Our stock price is subject to significant volatility. Overall market conditions, including a decline in oil and natural
gas prices and other risks and uncertainties described in this “Risk Factors” section and in our other filings with the SEC,
could cause the market price of our common stock to fall. Our high and low sales prices of our common stock for the
twelve months ended December 31, 2019 were $4.28 and $1.90, respectively. Further, the high and low sales prices of our
common stock for the twelve months ended December 31, 2018 were $8.40 and $3.04, respectively.
Our common stock is listed on The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“NASDAQ”) under the symbol “DWSN.”
However, daily trading volumes for our common stock are, and may continue to be, relatively small compared to many
other publicly traded securities. For example, during 2019 our daily trading volume was as low as 5,000 shares. It may be
difficult for you to sell your shares in the public market at any given time at prevailing prices, and the price of our common
stock may, therefore, be volatile.
Our common stock traded below $5.00 per share for the past year, and when it trades below $5.00 per share it may be
considered a low‑priced stock and may be subject to regulations that limit or restrict the potential market for the stock.
Our common stock may be considered a low-priced stock pursuant to rules promulgated under the Exchange Act,
if it continues to trade below a price of $5.00 per share. Under these rules, broker-dealers participating in transactions in
low-priced securities must first deliver a risk disclosure document which describes the risks associated with such stock, the
broker-dealer’s duties, the client’s rights and remedies, and certain market and other information, and make a suitability
determination approving the client for low-priced stock transactions based on the client’s financial situation, investment
experience and objectives. Broker-dealers must also disclose these restrictions in writing and provide monthly account
statements to the client, and obtain specific written consent of the client. With these restrictions, the likely effect of
designation as a low-price stock would be to decrease the willingness of broker-dealers to make a market for our common
stock, to decrease the liquidity of the stock, and to increase the transaction costs of sales and purchases of such stocks
compared to other securities. Our common stock traded below a price of $5.00 per share for the duration of 2019 and we
cannot guarantee that our common stock will trade at a price greater than $5.00 per share.
11
Table of Contents
We do not expect to pay cash dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future, and, therefore, only
appreciation of the price of our common stock may provide a return to shareholders.
While there are currently no restrictions prohibiting us from paying cash dividends to our shareholders, our Board
of Directors, after consideration of economic and market conditions affecting the energy industry in general, and the
oilfield services business in particular, determined that we would not pay a cash dividend in respect of our common stock
for the foreseeable future. Payment of any cash dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our board and will
depend on our financial condition, results of operations, capital and legal requirements, and other factors deemed relevant
by the board.
Certain provisions of our amended and restated certificate of formation may make it difficult for a third party to
acquire us in the future or may adversely impact your ability to obtain a premium in connection with a future change of
control transaction.
Our amended and restated certificate of formation contains provisions that require the approval of holders of 80%
of our issued and outstanding shares before we may merge or consolidate with or into another corporation or entity or sell
all, or substantially all, of our assets to another corporation or entity. Additionally, if we increase the size of our board to
nine directors, we could, by resolution of the Board of Directors, stagger the directors’ terms, and our directors could not be
removed without approval of holders of 80% of our issued and outstanding shares. These provisions could discourage or
impede a tender offer, proxy contest or other similar transaction involving control of us.
In addition, our Board of Directors has the right to issue preferred stock upon such terms and conditions as it
deems to be in our best interest. The terms of such preferred stock may adversely impact the dividend and liquidation rights
of our common shareholders without the approval of our common shareholders.
We may be subject to liability claims that are not covered by our insurance.
Our business is subject to the general risks inherent in land‑based seismic data acquisition activities. Our activities
are often conducted in remote areas under dangerous conditions, including the detonation of dynamite. These operations
are subject to risk of injury to personnel and damage to equipment. Our crews are mobile, and equipment and personnel are
subject to vehicular accidents. These risks could cause us to experience equipment losses, injuries to our personnel, and
interruptions in our business.
In addition, we could be subject to personal injury or real property damage claims in the normal operation of our
business. Such claims may not be covered under the indemnification provisions contained in our general service
agreements to the extent that the damage is due to our negligence or intentional misconduct.
Our general service agreements require us to have specific amounts of insurance. However, we do not carry
insurance against certain risks that could cause losses, including business interruption resulting from equipment
maintenance or weather delays. Further, there can be no assurance, however, that any insurance obtained by us will be
adequate to cover all losses or liabilities or that this insurance will continue to be available or available on terms which are
acceptable to us. Liabilities for which we are not insured, or which exceed the policy limits of our applicable insurance,
could have a materially adverse effect on us.
We may be held liable for the actions of our subcontractors.
We often work as the general contractor on seismic data acquisition surveys and, consequently, engage a number
of subcontractors to perform services and provide products. While we obtain contractual indemnification and insurance
covering the acts of these subcontractors and require the subcontractors to obtain insurance for our benefit, we could be
held liable for the actions of these subcontractors. In addition, subcontractors may cause injury to our personnel or damage
to our property that is not fully covered by insurance.
We operate under hazardous conditions that subject us to risk of damage to property or personnel injuries and may
interrupt our business.
Our business is subject to the general risks inherent in land‑based seismic data acquisition activities. Our activities
are often conducted in remote areas under extreme weather and other dangerous conditions, including the use of dynamite
as an energy source. These operations are subject to risk of injury to our personnel and third parties and damage to our
12
Table of Contents
equipment and improvements in the areas in which we operate. In addition, our crews often operate in areas where the risk
of wildfires is present and may be increased by our activities. Since our crews are mobile, equipment and personnel are
subject to vehicular accidents. We use diesel fuel which is classified by the U.S. Department of Transportation as a
hazardous material. These risks could cause us to experience equipment losses, injuries to our personnel and interruptions
in our business. Delays due to operational disruptions such as equipment losses, personnel injuries and business
interruptions could adversely affect our profitability and results of operations.
Loss of our information and computer systems could adversely affect our business.
We are heavily dependent on our information systems and computer‑based programs, including our seismic
information, electronic data processing and accounting data. If any of such programs or systems were to fail or create
erroneous information in our hardware or software network infrastructure, or if we were subject to cyberspace breaches or
attacks, possible consequences include our loss of communication links, loss of seismic data and inability to automatically
process commercial transactions or engage in similar automated or computerized business activities. Any such consequence
could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Our business could be negatively impacted by security threats, including cyber‑security threats and other disruptions.
We face various security threats, including cyber‑security threats to gain unauthorized access to sensitive
information or to render data or systems unusable, threats to the safety of our employees, threats to the security of our
facilities and infrastructure, and threats from terrorist acts. Cyber‑security attacks in particular are evolving and include, but
are not limited to, malicious software, attempts to gain unauthorized access to data and other electronic security breaches
that could lead to disruptions in critical systems, unauthorized release of confidential or otherwise protected information
and corruption of data. Although we utilize various procedures and controls to monitor and protect against these threats and
to mitigate our exposure to such threats, there can be no assurance that these procedures and controls will be sufficient in
preventing security threats from materializing. If any of these events were to materialize, they could lead to losses of
sensitive information, critical infrastructure, personnel or capabilities essential to our operations and could have a material
adverse effect on our reputation, financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Our business is subject to government regulation that may adversely affect our future operations.
Our operations are subject to a variety of federal, state, provincial and local laws and regulations, including laws
and regulations relating to the protection of the environment and archeological sites and those that may result from climate
change legislation. Canadian operations have been historically cyclical due to governmental restrictions on seismic
acquisition during certain periods. As a result, there is a risk that there will be a significant amount of unused equipment
during those periods. We are required to expend financial and managerial resources to comply with such laws and related
permit requirements in our operations, and we anticipate that we will continue to be required to do so in the future.
Although such expenditures historically have not been material to us, the fact that such laws or regulations change
frequently makes it impossible for us to predict the cost or impact of such laws and regulations on our future operations.
The adoption of laws and regulations that have the effect of reducing or curtailing exploration and development activities
by energy companies could also adversely affect our operations by reducing the demand for our services.
Current and future legislation or regulation relating to climate change could negatively affect the exploration and
production of oil and gas and adversely affect demand for our services.
In response to concerns suggesting that emissions of certain gases, commonly referred to as “greenhouse gases”
(“GHG”) (including carbon dioxide and methane), may be contributing to global climate change, legislative and regulatory
measures to address the concerns are in various phases of discussion or implementation at the national and state levels.
Many states, either individually or through multi‑state regional initiatives, have already taken legal measures intended to
reduce GHG emissions, primarily through the planned development of GHG emission inventories and/or GHG cap and
trade programs. Although various climate change legislative measures have periodically been introduced in the U.S.
Congress, and there has been a wide-ranging policy debate both in the United States and internationally regarding the
impact of these gases and possible means for their regulation, it is not possible at this time to predict whether or when
Congress may act on climate change legislation. However, future actions that require substantial reductions in carbon
emissions could be costly and difficult to implement.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) has promulgated a series of regulations that require
monitoring and reporting of GHG emissions on an annual basis, including extensive GHG monitoring and reporting
13
Table of Contents
requirements. While these rules do not control GHG emission levels from any facilities, they can cause covered facilities to
incur monitoring and reporting costs. Moreover, lawsuits have been filed seeking to require individual companies to reduce
GHG emissions from their operations. These and other lawsuits relating to GHG emissions may result in decisions by state
and federal courts and agencies that could impact our operations.
In addition, the United States was actively involved in the United Nations Conference on Climate Change in Paris,
which led to the creation of the Paris Agreement. In April 2016, the United States signed the Paris Agreement, which
requires countries to review and “represent a progression” in their nationally determined contributions, which set emissions
reduction goals, every five years. In November 2019, the State Department formally informed the United Nations of the
United States’ withdrawal from the Paris Agreement. Due to the Paris Agreement’s protocol, the earliest the United States
will be able to withdraw is November 2020. However, additional legislation or regulation by states and regions, the EPA,
and/or any international agreements to which the United States may become a party that control or limit GHG emissions or
otherwise seek to address climate change could adversely affect our operations.
The increasing governmental focus on GHG emissions may result in new environmental laws or regulations that
may negatively affect us, our suppliers and our clients. This could cause us to incur additional direct costs in complying
with any new environmental regulations, as well as increased indirect costs resulting from our clients, suppliers or both
incurring additional compliance costs that get passed on to us. Moreover, passage of climate change legislation, other
federal or state legislative or regulatory initiatives, or international agreements that regulate or restrict emissions of GHG
may curtail production and demand for fossil fuels such as oil and gas in areas where our clients operate and, thus,
adversely affect future demand for our services. Reductions in our revenues or increases in our expenses as a result of
climate control initiatives could have adverse effects on our business, financial position, results of operations and cash
flows.
New regulation or legislation that limits or prohibits hydraulic fracturing could negatively affect the exploration and
production of oil and gas and adversely affect demand for our services.
Hydraulic fracturing is an important and commonly used process in the completion of oil and gas wells. Hydraulic
fracturing involves the injection of water, sand and chemical additives under pressure into rock formations to stimulate gas
production. Several political and regulatory authorities and governmental bodies have studied hydraulic fracturing and
considered potential regulations, and certain environmental and other groups have devoted resources to campaigns aimed at
restricting or eradicating hydraulic fracturing.
Due to public concerns raised regarding potential impacts of hydraulic fracturing on groundwater quality,
legislative and regulatory efforts at the federal level and in some states have been initiated to require or make more
stringent the permitting and compliance requirements for hydraulic fracturing operations. For example, EPA issued a final
report in December 2016, concluding that hydraulic fracturing activities have the potential to impact drinking water
resources, particularly when involving water withdrawals, spills, fracturing into wells with inadequate mechanical integrity,
fracturing directly into such resources, underground migration of liquids and gases, and inadequate treatment, disposal,
storage and discharge of wastewater. The final report also listed the data gaps and uncertainties that limited the EPA’s
ability to fully assess the potential impacts of hydraulic fracturing on drinking water resources. The EPA has asserted
federal regulatory authority over hydraulic fracturing using fluids that contain “diesel fuel” under the Safe Drinking Water
Act (“SDWA”) Underground Injection Control Program and has released a revised guidance regarding the process for
obtaining a permit for hydraulic fracturing involving diesel fuel. In May 2014, the EPA issued an Advanced Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, seeking comment on the development of regulations under the Toxic Substances Control Act to
require companies to disclose information regarding the chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing. The EPA has not yet
finalized this rule. In June 2016, the EPA published final pretreatment standards for disposal of wastewater produced from
shale gas operations to publicly owned treatment works. These regulatory initiatives could each spur further action toward
federal and/or state legislation and regulation of hydraulic fracturing activities. Certain states have also adopted or are
considering disclosure legislation and/or regulations. Additional regulation could materially reduce our business
opportunities and revenues if our customers decrease their levels of activity in response to such regulation.
Some parties also believe that there is a correlation between hydraulic fracturing and other oilfield related
activities and the increased occurrence of seismic activity. When caused by human activity, such seismic activity is called
induced seismicity. The extent of this correlation, if any, is the subject of studies of both state and federal agencies. In
addition, a number of lawsuits have been filed against other industry participants alleging damages and regulatory
violations in connection with such activity. These and other ongoing or proposed studies could spur initiatives to further
14
Table of Contents
regulate hydraulic fracturing under the SDWA and other aspects of the oil and gas industry. In light of concerns about
induced seismicity, some state regulatory agencies have already modified their regulations or issued orders to address
induced seismicity.
The adoption of any future federal, state, foreign, regional or local laws that impact permitting requirements for,
result in reporting obligations on, or otherwise limit or ban, the hydraulic fracturing process could make it more difficult to
perform hydraulic fracturing. This could reduce demand for our services. Regulation that significantly restricts or prohibits
hydraulic fracturing, or that requires hydraulic fracturing operations to meet permitting and financial assurance
requirements, adhere to certain construction specifications, fulfill monitoring, reporting, and recordkeeping obligations, and
meet plugging and abandonment requirements, could have a material adverse impact on our business. Additionally,
legislation that requires the reporting and public disclosure of chemicals used in the fracturing process could make it easier
for third parties opposing the hydraulic fracturing process to initiate legal proceedings based on allegations that specific
chemicals used in the fracturing process could adversely affect groundwater.
These legislative and regulatory initiatives imposing additional reporting obligations on, or otherwise limiting, the
hydraulic fracturing process could make it more difficult or costly to complete natural gas wells. Shale gas cannot be
economically produced without extensive fracturing. In the event such legislation is enacted, demand for our seismic
acquisition services may be adversely affected.
We are subject to the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act (“Section 404”). If we are unable to
maintain compliance with Section 404, or if the costs related to maintaining compliance are significant, our
profitability, stock price, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
If we are unable to maintain adequate internal controls in accordance with Section 404, as such standards are
amended, supplemented, or modified from time to time, we may not be able to ensure that we have effective internal
controls over financial reporting on an ongoing basis in accordance with Section 404. Failure to achieve and maintain
effective internal controls could have a material adverse effect on our stock price. In addition, a material weakness in the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting could result in an increased chance of fraud and the loss of
clients, reduce our ability to obtain financing, and/or require additional expenditures to comply with these requirements,
each of which could negatively impact our business, profitability and financial condition.
Item 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
Item 2. PROPERTIES
Our headquarters are located in a 34,570 square foot leased property in Midland, Texas. We have two properties in
Midland that we own, including a 61,402 square foot property we use as a field office, equipment and fabrication facility,
and maintenance and repair shop, along with a 6,600 square foot property that we use as an inventory field office and
storage facility.
We also have additional offices in three other cities in Texas: Denison, Houston and Plano. Our Denison
warehouse facility consists of one 5,000 square foot building, two 10,000 square foot adjacent buildings and an outdoor
storage area of approximately 60,500 square feet. Our Houston sales office is in an 8,161 square foot facility. Our office in
Plano, Texas consists of 7,797 square feet of office space.
We lease an 1,801 square foot facility in Denver, Colorado as a sales office. We also lease a 7,480 square foot
facility in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma as a sales office.
We lease a 15,020 square foot facility in Calgary, Alberta consisting of office, warehouse and shop space.
We believe that our existing facilities are being appropriately utilized in line with past experience and are well
maintained, suitable for their intended use, and adequate to meet our current and future operating requirements.
15
Table of Contents
Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
For a discussion of certain contingencies and legal proceedings affecting the Company, please refer to Note 16,
“Commitments and Contingencies,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements incorporated by reference herein.
Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
Part II
Item 5. MARKET FOR OUR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Our common stock trades on the NASDAQ under the symbol “DWSN.” The table below represents the high and
low sales prices per share for the periods shown.
Three Months Ended
March 29, 2018
June 29, 2018
September 28, 2018
December 31, 2018
March 29, 2019
June 28, 2019
September 30, 2019
December 30, 2019
High Low
$ 4.64
$ 5.38
$ 5.50
$ 3.04
$ 2.88
$ 2.01
$ 1.90
$ 1.93
6.78
8.40
8.28
6.57
4.28
3.20
2.75
2.88
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
As of March 4, 2020, the market price for our common stock was $1.88 per share, and we had 110 common
stockholders of record, as reported by our transfer agent.
The Board of Directors approved a 5% stock dividend (or 0.05 share for each share outstanding) on the
outstanding shares of our common stock on May 1, 2018. The stock dividend was paid on May 29, 2018 to shareholders of
record on May 14, 2018. All comparative financial statement presentations have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the
dividend.
No dividends were paid in 2019. While there are currently no restrictions prohibiting us from paying dividends to
our shareholders, our Board of Directors, after consideration of economic and market conditions affecting the energy
industry in general, and the oilfield services business in particular, determined that we would not pay a dividend in respect
of our common stock for the foreseeable future. Payment of any dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our
board and will depend on our financial condition, results of operations, capital and legal requirements, and other factors
deemed relevant by the board.
16
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes certain information regarding securities authorized for issuance under our equity
compensation plans as of December 31, 2019. See information and definitions regarding material features of the plans in
Note 8, “Stock‑Based Compensation,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements incorporated by reference herein.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
Number of
Securities to be
Issued Upon
Exercise or
Vesting of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants and
Rights
(a)
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
of Outstanding
Options,
Warrants and
Rights
Number of Securities
Remaining Available
for Future Issuance
Under the Equity
Compensation Plan
(Excluding Securities
Reflected in
Column (a))
410,100
$
— (1)
330,861
—
410,100
$
—
—
—
330,861
Plan Category
2016 Plan
Equity compensation plan approved by security holders
Equity compensation plans not approved by security
holders
Total
(1)
Restricted stock unit awards have no exercise price.
17
Table of Contents
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following graph matches Dawson Geophysical Company’s cumulative five year total shareholder return on
common stock with the cumulative total returns of the S&P 500 index and the PHLX Oil Service Sector index. The graph
tracks the performance of a $100 investment in our common stock and in each index (with the reinvestment of all
dividends) from December 31, 2014 to December 31, 2019.
COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among Dawson Geophysical Company, the S&P 500 Index
and the PHLX Oil Service Sector Index
*
$100 invested on December 31, 2014 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends.
Year ended December 31.
Dawson Geophysical Company
S&P 500
PHLX Oil Service Sector
12/14 12/15 12/16 12/17 12/18 12/19
40.51
156.92
37.13
54.77
53.40 124.07
99.27 108.74 129.86 121.76
38.22
74.80
100.00
100.00
100.00
87.16
76.70
70.92
The stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
18
Table of Contents
Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and the Company’s consolidated financial statements and
related notes included in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” Amounts below are in thousands, except
per share amounts.
Operating revenues
Net loss (1)
Basic loss per share of common stock
Weighted average equivalent common
shares outstanding
Total assets
Revolving line of credit
Current maturities of notes payable,
finance leases, and operating lease
liabilities
Notes payable, finance leases, and
operating lease liabilities, net of current
maturities
Stockholders’ equity
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2019
145,773
(15,213)
(0.66)
$
$
$
2018
154,156 $
(24,407) $
(1.07) $
Year Ended December 31,
2017
156,532 $
(31,790) $
(1.40) $
2016
137,640 $
(38,333) $
(1.69) $
2015
234,685
(26,279)
(1.21)
23,179
127,608
$
— $
22,912
150,685 $
— $
22,779
167,919 $
— $
22,692
190,455 $
— $
21,732
247,787
—
5,262
$
6,683 $
2,712 $
2,357 $
8,585
6,036
103,165
$
$
6,097 $
117,016 $
5,153 $
141,318 $
— $
171,474 $
2,106
209,718
(1)
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2015 includes transaction costs associated with the Merger of $3,314,000.
Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and related
notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10‑K. Portions of this document that are not statements of historical or
current fact are forward‑looking statements that involve risk and uncertainties, such as statements of our plans, business
strategy, objectives, expectations and intentions. This discussion contains forward‑looking statements that involve risks and
uncertainties. Please see “Business,” “Disclosure Regarding Forward‑Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors” elsewhere
in this Form 10‑K. Discussions of the year ended December 31, 2017 and year-to-year comparisons of the year ended
December 31, 2018 and the year ended December 31, 2017 can be found in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and the Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2018.
You should read this discussion in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere
in this Form 10‑K. Unless the context requires otherwise, all references in this Item 7 to the “Company,” “we,” “us” or
“our” refer to Dawson Geophysical Company and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Overview
We are a leading provider of North American onshore seismic data acquisition services with operations throughout
the continental U.S. and Canada. Substantially all of our revenues are derived from the seismic data acquisition services we
provide to our clients. Our clients consist of major oil and gas companies, independent oil and gas operators, and providers
of multi-client data libraries. In recent years, our primary customer base has consisted of providers of multi-client data
libraries. Demand for our services depends upon the level of spending by these companies for exploration, production,
development and field management activities, which depends, in a large part, on oil and natural gas prices. Significant
fluctuations in domestic oil and natural gas exploration and development activities related to commodity prices, as we have
recently experienced, have affected, and will continue to affect, demand for our services and our results of operations, and
such fluctuations continue to be the single most important factor affecting our business and results of operations.
19
Table of Contents
During the early part of the fourth quarter of 2019, we operated a peak of four crews in the U.S., primarily in the
Permian Basin region, including three large channel count crews. Crew activity in Canada was minimal during the fourth
quarter of 2019. The fourth quarter and early part of the first quarter in the U.S. historically has been challenging due to
shorter work days and the holiday season. The winter season in Canada concludes at the end of the first quarter of 2020.
Upon completion of the Canadian season, equipment will redeploy to the lower 48 in the second quarter of 2020. As in
recent quarters, the majority of our projects are on behalf of multi-client data companies in the U.S., with some activity
directly for exploration and production companies.
While fourth quarter 2019 results were below those of our third quarter, our fourth quarter results showed
significant improvement compared to the fourth quarter of 2018. We believe that our ability to successfully field large scale
deployments is a contributing factor to our success as the industry continues to transition toward a channel and energy
source business model and away from the traditional crew count model. Despite this improvement, our fourth quarter 2019
results were negatively impacted by the completion of several large projects early in the quarter, client delays that have
moved the start of new projects into the first quarter of 2020, and lower utilization of recording channels and energy source
units. Utilization was suppressed into the early part of the first quarter of 2020.
During fiscal year 2019, we experienced a general increase in recording channels and energy source unit
requirements per 3-D project and believe that trend will continue into next year. The increase in recording channels and
energy source units allowed us to perform larger 3D surveys with increased density, which aids in improving subsurface
resolution and allows for increased crew productivity and efficiency. As we moved to more of a recording channel and
energy source model as opposed to a crew model during the year, we were able to increase crew efficiency, improve
utilization on a per crew basis and reduce crew level operating cost. However, due to various factors during the year,
overall utilization was inconsistent from period to period as we experienced project readiness delays, client delays and
completion of project timing issues. While we are confident in our demand visibility in the early part of 2020, we anticipate
similar issues could exist in 2020.
The oil service markets remain challenging as the capital spending levels of exploration and production companies
remain somewhat constrained and unpredictable. Utilization visibility into the second half of 2020 remains unclear. As of
the middle part of the first quarter, we are near full utilization with three large crews operating in the U.S., primarily the
Permian Basin region, and three crews operating in Canada. Based on currently available information, we anticipate the
same level of activity through the end of the first quarter of 2020 with the three large crews in the U.S. operating well into
the second quarter of 2020. While the seismic market remains challenging, conversations with our clients, primarily
providers of multi-client data libraries, are positive for continued levels of activity through 2020.
While our revenues are mainly affected by the level of client demand for our services, our revenues are also
affected by the pricing for our services that we negotiate with our clients and the productivity and utilization level of our
data acquisition crews. Factors impacting productivity and utilization levels include client demand, commodity prices,
whether we enter into turnkey or dayrate contracts with our clients, the number and size of crews, the number of recording
channels per crew, crew downtime related to inclement weather, delays in acquiring land access permits, agricultural or
hunting activity, holiday schedules, short winter days, crew repositioning and equipment failure. To the extent we
experience these factors, our operating results may be affected from quarter to quarter. Consequently, our efforts to
negotiate more favorable contract terms in our supplemental service agreements, mitigate permit access delays and improve
overall crew productivity may contribute to growth in our revenues.
The majority of our revenues were derived from turnkey contracts for the years ending December 31, 2019 and
2018. While turnkey contracts allow us to capitalize on improved crew productivity, we also bear more risks related to
weather and crew downtime. We expect the majority of our contracts to be turnkey as we continue our operations in the
mid-continent, western and southwestern regions of the U.S. in which turnkey contracts are more common.
Over time, we have experienced continued increases in recording channel capacity on a per-crew or project basis
and high utilization of cableless and multicomponent equipment. This increase in channel count demand is driven by client
needs and is necessary in order to produce higher resolution images, increase crew efficiencies and undertake larger scale
projects. In response to project-based channel requirements, we routinely deploy a variable number of channels on a
variable number of crews in an effort to maximize asset utilization and meet client needs.
While the markets for oil and natural gas have been very volatile and are likely to continue to be so in the future,
and we can make no assurances as to future levels of domestic exploration or commodity prices, we believe opportunities
20
Table of Contents
exist for us to enhance our market position by responding to our clients’ continuing desire for higher resolution subsurface
images. If economic conditions continue to weaken such that our clients continue to reduce their capital expenditures or if
the sustained drop in oil and natural gas prices worsens, it could continue to result in diminished demand for our seismic
services, could cause downward pressure on the prices we charge and would affect our results of operations.
Results of Operations
Year Ended December 31, 2019 versus Year Ended December 31, 2018
Operating Revenues. Operating revenues for the year ended December 31, 2019 were $145,773,000 compared to
$154,156,000 for the same period of 2018. The decrease in revenue totals for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared
to the same period of 2018 was primarily a result of decreased equipment and crew utilization, and project startup delays
resulting from larger projects.
Operating Expenses. Operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2019 decreased to $123,024,000
compared to $132,937,000 for the same period of 2018. The decrease in operating expenses was mainly due to an overall
decrease in crew production and utilization.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses were 11.8% of revenues in the year
ended December 31, 2019 compared to 10.6% of revenues in the same period of 2018. General and administrative expenses
increased to $17,169,000 during the year ended December 31, 2019 from $16,287,000 during the same period of 2018. The
primary factors for the increase in general and administrative expenses are related to severance and retirement costs due to
headcount reductions and executive retirements that occurred in 2019.
Depreciation Expense. Depreciation for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $21,826,000 compared to
$29,959,000 for the same period of 2018. The decrease in depreciation expense is a result of limiting capital expenditures
to necessary maintenance capital requirements in recent years. Our depreciation expense is expected to remain flat during
2020 primarily due to limited capital expenditures to maintain our existing asset base.
Our total operating costs for the year ended December 31, 2019 were $162,019,000, representing a 9.6% decrease
from the corresponding period of 2018. This change was primarily due to the factors described above.
Income Taxes. Income tax benefit was $239,000 for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to $798,000 for
the same period of 2018. The effective tax benefit rates for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were
approximately 1.5% and 3.1%, respectively. Our effective tax rates decreased compared to the corresponding period from
the prior year primarily due to the fuel tax and the AMT credits. Our effective tax rates differ from the statutory federal rate
of 21% for certain items such as state and local taxes, valuation allowances, non‑deductible expenses and discrete items.
Use of EBITDA (Non‑GAAP measure)
We define EBITDA as net income (loss) plus interest expense, interest income, income taxes, and depreciation
and amortization expense. Our management uses EBITDA as a supplemental financial measure to assess:
·
·
·
the financial performance of our assets without regard to financing methods, capital structures, taxes or
historical cost basis;
our liquidity and operating performance over time in relation to other companies that own similar assets and
that we believe calculate EBITDA in a similar manner; and
the ability of our assets to generate cash sufficient for us to pay potential interest costs.
We also understand that such data are used by investors to assess our performance. However, the term EBITDA is
not defined under generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), and EBITDA is not a measure of operating income,
operating performance or liquidity presented in accordance with GAAP. When assessing our operating performance or
liquidity, investors and others should not consider this data in isolation or as a substitute for net income (loss), cash flow
from operating activities or other cash flow data calculated in accordance with GAAP. In addition, our EBITDA may not be
comparable to EBITDA or similarly titled measures utilized by other companies since such other
21
Table of Contents
companies may not calculate EBITDA in the same manner as us. Further, the results presented by EBITDA cannot be
achieved without incurring the costs that the measure excludes: interest, taxes, and depreciation and amortization.
The reconciliation of our EBITDA to our net loss and net cash provided by (used in) operating activities, which
are the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures, are provided in the following tables (in thousands):
Net loss
Depreciation and amortization
Interest (income) expense, net
Income tax benefit
EBITDA
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
Changes in working capital and other items
Non-cash adjustments to net loss
EBITDA
Liquidity and Capital Resources
$
$
$
$
Year Ended December 31,
2018
(24,407) $
29,959
8
(798)
4,762 $
2019
(15,213) $
21,826
(113)
(239)
6,261 $
2017
(31,790)
39,235
(148)
(5,314)
1,983
Year Ended December 31,
2018
2019
2017
9,480 $
(812)
(2,407)
6,261 $
12,871 $
(6,741)
(1,368)
4,762 $
(6,703)
9,662
(976)
1,983
Introduction. Our principal sources of cash are amounts earned from the seismic data acquisition services we
provide to our clients. Our principal uses of cash are the amounts used to provide these services, including expenses related
to our operations and acquiring new equipment. Accordingly, our cash position depends (as do our revenues) on the level of
demand for our services. Historically, cash generated from our operations along with cash reserves and borrowings from
commercial banks have been sufficient to fund our working capital requirements and, to some extent, our capital
expenditures.
Cash Flows. The following table shows our sources and uses of cash (in thousands) for the years ended December
31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:
Year Ended December 31,
2018
2019
2017
Net cash provided by (used in)
Operating activities
Investing activities
Financing activities
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted
cash
Net change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
$
9,480 $
4,185
(11,256)
12,871 $
(8,596)
2,517
(6,703)
16,788
(3,420)
133
2,542 $
(76)
6,716 $
724
7,389
$
Year Ended December 31, 2019 versus Year Ended December 31, 2018
Net cash provided by operating activities was $9,480,000 and $12,871,000 for the years ended December 31, 2019
and 2018, respectively. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to a decrease in our
operating level of deferred revenue as of December 31, 2019.
Net cash provided by investing activities was $4,185,000 for the year ended December 31, 2019 and includes
$8,233,000 of proceeds from maturities of short-term investments that were not reinvested offset by cash capital
expenditures of $4,396,000. Net cash used in investing activities was $8,596,000 for the year ended December 31, 2018
and includes $6,000,000 of proceeds from maturities of short-term investments that were not reinvested offset by cash
capital expenditures of $15,745,000.
22
Table of Contents
Net cash used in financing activities was $11,256,000 for the year ended December 31, 2019 and includes
principal payments of $8,165,000 on our notes and $2,855,000 on our finance leases, and outflows of $236,000 associated
with taxes related to stock vesting. Net cash provided by financing activities was $2,517,000 for the year ended December
31, 2018 and includes proceeds from notes payable used to purchase seismic data acquisition equipment of $6,518,000
offset by principal payments of $1,180,000 on our notes and $2,699,000 on our finance leases, and outflows of $121,000
associated with taxes related to stock vesting.
We continually strive to supply our clients with technologically advanced 3-D data acquisition recording services
and data processing capabilities. We maintain equipment in and out of service in anticipation of increased future demand
for our services.
Capital Resources. Historically, we have primarily relied on cash generated from operations, cash reserves and
borrowings from commercial banks to fund our working capital requirements and, to some extent, our capital expenditures.
Recently, we have funded some of our capital expenditures through finance leases and equipment term loans. From time to
time in the past, we have also funded our capital expenditures and other financing needs through public equity offerings.
Dominion Credit Facility. On September 30, 2019, we entered into a new Loan and Security Agreement (the
“Loan Agreement”) with Dominion Bank (the “Lender”). The Loan Agreement provides for a revolving credit facility (the
“Revolving Credit Facility”) in an amount up to the lesser of (i) $15,000,000 or (ii) a sum equal to (a) 80% of our eligible
accounts receivable plus 100% of the amount on deposit with the Lender in our collateral account, consisting of a restricted
CDARS account of $5,000,000 (the “Deposit”).
Under the Revolving Credit Facility, interest will accrue at an annual rate equal to the lesser of (i) 6.00% and (ii)
the greater of (a) the prime rate as published from time to time in The Wall Street Journal or (b) 3.50%. We will pay a
commitment fee of 0.10% per annum on the difference of (a) $15,000,000 minus the Deposit minus (b) the daily average
usage of the Revolving Credit Facility. The Loan Agreement contains customary covenants for credit facilities of this type,
including limitations on disposition of assets. We are also obligated to meet certain financial covenants under the Loan
Agreement, including maintaining a tangible net worth of $75,000,000 and specified ratios with respect to current assets
and liabilities and debt to tangible net worth. Our obligations under the Loan Agreement are secured by a security interest
in the collateral account (including the Deposit) with the Lender and future accounts receivable and related collateral. As of
December 31, 2019, we have not borrowed any amounts under the Revolving Credit Facility. The maturity date of the Loan
Agreement is September 30, 2020.
We do not currently have any notes payable under the Revolving Credit Facility.
Veritex Credit Agreement. On September 30, 2019, our line of credit (the “Veritex Line of Credit”) under the
Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (as amended, the “Veritex Loan Agreement”) by and between us and
Veritex Community Bank (“Veritex”) matured pursuant to its terms. No amounts were borrowed under the Veritex Line of
Credit. In connection with the maturity of the Veritex Line of Credit and entry into the Loan Agreement with Dominion
Bank, we paid off all amounts owed pursuant to the term loan under the Veritex Loan Agreement of $4,355,665.
Veritex Letters of Credit. As of December 31, 2019, Veritex has issued two letters of credit under the Veritex Loan
Agreement. The first letter of credit is in the amount of $1,767,000 to support payment of our insurance obligations. The
second letter of credit is in the amount of $583,000 to support our workers compensation insurance. Each of the letters of
credit are secured by a certificate of deposit with Veritex.
Other Indebtedness. As of December 31, 2019, we have two notes payable to a finance company for various
insurance premiums totaling $1,746,000.
In addition, we lease certain seismic recording equipment and vehicles under leases classified as finance leases.
Our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2019 includes finance leases of $2,412,000.
Contractual Obligations. We believe that our capital resources, including our short‑term investments, cash flow
from operations, and funds available under our Revolving Credit Facility, will be adequate to meet our current operational
needs. We believe that we will be able to finance our 2020 capital expenditures through cash flow from operations,
borrowings from commercial lenders, and the funds available under our Revolving Credit Facility. However, our ability to
satisfy working capital requirements, meet debt repayment obligations, and fund future capital requirements will depend
23
Table of Contents
principally upon our future operating performance, which is subject to the risks inherent in our business, and will also
depend on the extent to which the current economic climate adversely affects the ability of our customers, and/or potential
customers, to promptly pay amounts owing to us under their service contracts with us.
The following table summarizes payments due in specific periods related to our contractual obligations with initial
terms exceeding one year as of December 31, 2019 (in thousands):
Payments Due by Period (in thousands)
Within
After
Contractual Obligations
Operating lease (right-of-use) obligations
Finance lease obligations
Debt obligations
Total
Off‑Balance Sheet Arrangements
Total
7,140
2,412
1,746
11,298
1 Year
1,200
$
2,316
1,746
5,262
$
$
$
2-
3 Years
2,008
$
89
—
2,097
$
As of December 31, 2019, we had no off‑balance sheet arrangements.
Critical Accounting Policies
4-
5 Years 5 Years
$ 1,888
$
—
—
$ 1,888
2,044
7
—
2,051
$
The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires that certain assumptions and
estimates be made that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Because of the use of assumptions and estimates
inherent in the reporting process, actual results could differ from those estimates.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. We prepare our allowance for doubtful accounts receivable based on our
review of past-due accounts, our past experience of historical write-offs and our current client base. While the collectability
of outstanding client invoices is continually assessed, the inherent volatility of the energy industry’s business cycle can
cause swift and unpredictable changes in the financial stability of our clients. Our allowance for doubtful accounts was
$250,000 at December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Notes Receivable. Our notes receivable consist of one note receivable from the purchaser of certain dynamite
energy source drilling equipment. This note receivable is stated at the unpaid principal balance. An allowance for note
losses was not deemed necessary at December 31, 2019. Interest is recognized over the term of the note and is calculated
using the simple-interest method. Amounts payable to us under the note receivable are fully collateralized by the specific
dynamite energy source drilling equipment sold to the note payor.
Impairment of Long‑Lived Assets. We review long‑lived assets for impairment when triggering events occur
suggesting deterioration in the assets’ recoverability or fair value. Recognition of an impairment charge is required if future
expected undiscounted net cash flows are insufficient to recover the carrying value of the assets, and the fair value of the
assets is below the carrying value of the assets. Our forecast of future cash flows used to perform impairment analysis
includes estimates of future revenues and expenses based on our anticipated future results while considering anticipated
future oil and gas prices, which is fundamental in assessing demand for our services. If the carrying amounts of the assets
exceed the estimated expected undiscounted future cash flows, we measure the amount of possible impairment by
comparing the carrying amount of the asset to its fair value. No impairment charges were recognized for the years ended
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Leases. We lease certain vehicles, seismic recording equipment, real property and office equipment under lease
agreements. We evaluate each lease to determine its appropriate classification as an operating lease or finance lease for
financial reporting purposes. We are the lessee in a lease contract when we obtain the right to control the asset. The
majority of our operating leases are non-cancelable operating leases for office, shop and warehouse space in Midland,
Plano, Denison, Houston, Denver, Oklahoma City and Calgary, Alberta.
24
Table of Contents
The assets and liabilities under finance leases are recorded at the lower of the present value of the minimum lease
payments or the fair market value of the related assets. Assets under finance leases are amortized using the straight‑line
method over the initial lease term. Amortization of assets under finance leases is included in depreciation expense.
In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update
(“ASU”) No. 2016-02, Leases (“Topic 842”) requiring organizations that lease assets to recognize on the balance sheet the
assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by those leases. Topic 842 also requires qualitative and
quantitative disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand the amount, timing and
uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases.
On January 1, 2019, we adopted Topic 842 using the optional cumulative-effect transition method of adoption,
under which the new standards were applied prospectively rather than restating the prior periods presented. As a result,
certain accounts lack a comparable value for the same period of 2018 and 2017, specifically accounts and values associated
with operating leases and right-of-use (“ROU”) assets. As a result of adopting the new standard, we recorded ROU assets
and operating lease liabilities of approximately $7,769,000 and $8,252,000, respectively, on the consolidated balance sheet
for 2019. The ROU assets equaled the operating lease liabilities, excluding the impact of reclassifying prepaid rent and
deferred rent of approximately $14,000 and $497,000, respectively. These amounts were previously recorded in prepaid
expenses and other current assets and other accrued liabilities, respectively. The new standard did not materially impact our
results of operation or cash flows.
In addition, we made an accounting policy election not to recognize leases with an initial term of 12 months or
less and not to separate lease and non-lease components. We elected the practical expedients package, which among other
things, allowed us to carry forward the historical lease classification. We did not elect the hindsight or land easement
practical expedients.
Several of our leases include options to renew, with renewal terms that can extend from one to 10 years or more.
The exercise of lease renewal options is primarily at our discretion. To measure operating lease recognition, we evaluated
our lease agreements to determine if they had economic incentives for renewal or options to purchase. We deem leasehold
improvements as one of the few economic incentives that would entice us to renew a lease and all of our leasehold
improvements are currently fully amortized.
Where readily determinable, we use the implicit interest rate in determining the present value of future minimum
lease payments. In the absence of an implicit rate, we use our incremental borrowing rate based on the information
available at the lease commencement date. We give consideration to our outstanding debt, as well as publicly available data
for instruments with similar characteristics when calculating our incremental borrowing rates. Our ROU assets are
amortized to operating lease cost over the lease terms on a straight-line basis.
Revenue Recognition. Our services are provided under cancelable service contracts which usually have an
original expected duration of one year or less. These contracts are either “turnkey” or “term” agreements. Under both types
of agreements, we recognize revenue as the services are performed. Revenue is generally recognized based on square miles
of data recorded compared to total square miles anticipated to be recorded on the survey using the total estimated revenue
for the service contract. In the case of a cancelled service contract, the client is billed and revenue is recognized for any
third party charges and square miles of data recorded up to the date of cancellation.
We also receive reimbursements for certain out-of-pocket expenses under the terms of the service contracts. The
amounts billed to clients are included at their gross amount in the total estimated revenue for the service contract.
Clients are billed as permitted by the service contract. Contract assets and contract liabilities are the result of
timing differences between revenue recognition, billings and cash collections. If billing occurs prior to the revenue
recognition or billing exceeds the revenue recognized, the amount is considered deferred revenue and a contract liability.
Conversely, if the revenue recognition exceeds the billing, the excess is considered an unbilled receivable and a contract
asset. As services are performed, those contract liabilities and contract assets are recognized as revenue and expense,
respectively.
In some instances, third-party permitting, surveying, drilling, helicopter, equipment rental and mobilization costs
that directly relate to the contract are utilized to fulfill the contract obligations. These fulfillment costs are capitalized in
25
Table of Contents
other current assets and amortized based on the total square miles of data recorded compared to total square miles
anticipated to be recorded on the survey using the total estimated fulfillment costs for the service contract.
Estimates for total revenue and total fulfillment cost on any service contract are based on significant qualitative
and quantitative judgments. Management considers a variety of factors such as whether various components of the
performance obligation will be performed internally or externally, cost of third party services, and facts and circumstances
unique to the performance obligation in making these estimates.
In May 2014, the FASB issued new guidance related to revenue recognition in which an entity should recognize
revenue when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which
the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Codified as Topic 606, this new guidance also
required disclosures sufficient to enable users to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash
flows arising from contracts with customers.
We adopted Topic 606 effective January 1, 2018, using the full retrospective method, which required us to adjust
our consolidated financial statements from amounts previously reported for each prior reporting period presented. We
recognized the cumulative effect of adopting the guidance as an adjustment to our opening balance of retained earnings as
of January 1, 2016. We elected several ongoing and transitional practical expedients including (i) to ignore the financing
component when estimating the transaction price for service contracts completed within one year, (ii) to exclude sales tax
collected from the customer when determining the transaction price, (iii) to expense incremental costs to obtain a customer
contract if the amortization period for those costs would otherwise be one year or less, (iv) to not restate contracts that
begin and end within the same annual reporting period, (v) to use the transaction price at the completion of the contract to
retrospectively apply the new guidance, and (vi) to not disclose the remaining performance obligations for the reporting
periods presented before the date of initial application. The most significant impact to us of the adoption of Topic 606
relates to the deferred recognition of revenues and expenses to fulfill contracts with customers until data recording has
begun.
Income Taxes. We account for our income taxes with the recognition of amounts of taxes payable or refundable
for the current year and by using an asset and liability approach in recognizing the amount of deferred tax liabilities and
assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns. We
determine deferred taxes by identifying the types and amounts of existing temporary differences, measuring the total
deferred tax asset or liability using the applicable tax rate in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are
expected to be recovered or settled. The effect of a change in tax rates of deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in
income in the year of an enacted rate change. The deferred tax asset is reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on
available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Our
methodology for recording income taxes requires judgment regarding assumptions and the use of estimates, including
determining our annual effective tax rate and the valuation of deferred tax assets, which can create a variance between
actual results and estimates and could have a material impact on our provision or benefit for income taxes. Due to our
recent operating losses and valuation allowances, we may recognize reduced or no tax benefits on future losses on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. Our effective tax rates differ from the statutory federal
rate of 21% for certain items such as state and local taxes, valuation allowances, non‑deductible expenses and discrete
items.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, Income Taxes (“Topic 740”): Simplifying the Accounting
for Income Taxes, which simplifies the accounting for income taxes by eliminating certain exceptions to the general
principles in Topic 740 and by clarifying and amending existing guidance to improve consistent application. This ASU is
effective for the annual period beginning after December 15, 2020, including interim periods within that annual period.
Certain amendments within this ASU are required to be applied on a retrospective basis for all periods presented; others are
to be applied using a modified retrospective approach with a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings, if any, as of
the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is adopted; and yet others are to be applied using either
basis. All other amendments not specified in the ASU should be applied on a prospective basis. Early adoption is permitted.
An entity that elects to early adopt in an interim period should reflect any adjustments as of the beginning of the annual
period that includes that interim period. Additionally, an entity that elects early adoption must adopt all the amendments in
the same period. We are currently evaluating the new guidance to determine the impact it will have on our consolidated
financial statements.
26
Table of Contents
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326):
Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which requires entities to measure expected credit losses for
certain financial assets using a new, forward-looking current expected credit loss model (“CECL”) that will result in the
earlier recognition of allowances for losses. CECL is based on historical experience, adjusted for current conditions and
reasonable and supportable forecasts. This ASU is effective for the annual period beginning after December 15, 2019,
including interim periods within that annual period using a modified retrospective approach with a cumulative-effect
adjustment to retained earnings for additional loss allowances, if any, as of the beginning of the first reporting period in
which the guidance is adopted. Our financial instruments within the scope of this guidance primarily includes trade
receivables, and we do not expect a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-07, Compensation – Stock Compensation (“Topic 718”):
Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which expands the scope of Topic 718 to include share-
based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from nonemployees except for certain circumstances. Any
transition impact will be a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the year of adoption. We
adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2019 and it did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework
– Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, which modifies the disclosure requirements on fair
value measurement by removing, modifying and adding certain disclosures. This ASU is effective for the annual period
beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within that annual period. The adoption of this guidance will
not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In August 2018, the SEC adopted amendments to simplify certain disclosure requirements, as set forth in
Securities Act Release No. 33-10532, Disclosure Update and Simplification, which includes a requirement for entities to
present the changes in shareholders’ equity in the interim financial statements in quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. This
amendment is effective for all filings made on or after November 5, 2018. In light of the timing of effectiveness of the
amendment and proximity to the filing date for most filers’ quarterly reports, the SEC has allowed for a filer’s first
presentation of the changes in shareholders’ equity to be included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter that begins after the
effective date. We adopted the SEC’s amendment to interim disclosures in the first quarter of 2019 and have presented the
changes in shareholders’ equity on an interim basis.
Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to certain market risks arising from the use of financial instruments in the ordinary course of
business. These risks arise primarily as a result of potential changes to operating concentration of credit risk and changes in
interest rates. We have not entered into any hedge arrangements, commodity swap agreements, commodity futures, options
or other derivative financial instruments. We also conduct business in Canada, which subjects our results of operations and
cash flows to foreign currency exchange rate risk.
Concentration of Credit Risk. Our principal market risks include fluctuations in commodity prices, which affect
demand for and pricing of our services, and the risk related to the concentration of our clients in the oil and natural gas
industry. Since all of our clients are involved in the oil and natural gas industry, there may be a positive or negative effect
on our exposure to credit risk because our clients may be similarly affected by changes in economic and industry
conditions. As an example, changes to existing regulations or the adoption of new regulations may unfavorably impact us,
our suppliers or our clients. In the normal course of business, we provide credit terms to our clients. Accordingly, we
perform ongoing credit evaluations of our clients and maintain allowances for possible losses. Our historical experience
supports our allowance for doubtful accounts of $250,000 at December 31, 2019. This does not necessarily indicate that it
would be adequate to cover a payment default by one large or several smaller clients.
We generally provide services to certain key clients that account for a significant percentage of our accounts
receivable at any given time. Our key clients vary over time. We extend credit to various companies in the oil and natural
gas industry, including our key clients, for the acquisition of seismic data, which results in a concentration of credit risk.
This concentration of credit risk may be affected by changes in the economic or other conditions of our key clients and may
accordingly impact our overall credit risk. If any of these significant clients were to terminate their contracts or fail to
contract for our services in the future because they are acquired, alter their exploration or development strategy, or for
27
Table of Contents
any other reason, our results of operations could be affected. Because of the nature of our contracts and clients’ projects,
our largest clients can change from year to year, and the largest clients in any year may not be indicative of the largest
clients in any subsequent year. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2019, our four largest clients accounted for
approximately 60% of revenue. The remaining balance of our revenue derived from varied clients and none represented
more than 10% of revenue.
Interest Rate Risk. From time to time, we are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes on the outstanding
indebtedness under our Loan Agreement.
We generally have cash in the bank which exceeds federally insured limits. Historically, we have not experienced
any losses in such accounts; however, volatility in financial markets may impact our credit risk on cash and short‑term
investments. At December 31, 2019, cash and cash equivalents totaled $26,271,000.
For further information, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations,” and “Item 1A. Risk Factors.”
Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The information required by this item appears on pages F‑1 through F‑24 hereof and are incorporated herein by
reference.
Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
None.
Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Management’s Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our
principal executive, financial and accounting officers, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures
pursuant to Rule 13a‑15(e) and 15d‑15(e) under the Exchange Act as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based
upon that evaluation, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary, and Treasurer concluded that, as of December 31, 2019, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective, in
all material respects, with regard to the recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, within the time periods specified
in the SEC’s rules and forms, for information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the
Exchange Act. Our disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer, and our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer, Secretary, and Treasurer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.
Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Because of
its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections
of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Under the
supervision and with the participation of management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Executive
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, and Treasurer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our internal controls
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019 using the criteria set forth in Internal Control — Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework). Based on this
evaluation, we have concluded that, as of December 31, 2019, our internal control over financial reporting was effective.
Our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019 has been audited by RSM US LLP, the
28
Table of Contents
independent registered public accounting firm who also audited our financial statements. Their attestation report appears on
page F‑2.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a‑15(f) and
15d‑15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended December 31, 2019 that have materially affected or are reasonably
likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
Part III
Item 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information required by Item 10 of Form 10‑K is hereby incorporated by reference from the earlier filed of:
(i) an amendment to this annual report on Form 10‑K or (ii) the Company’s definitive proxy statement which will be filed
pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the Company’s year-end for the year covered by this report.
Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by Item 11 of Form 10‑K is hereby incorporated by reference from the earlier filed of:
(i) an amendment to this annual report on Form 10‑K or (ii) the Company’s definitive proxy statement which will be filed
pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the Company’s year-end for the year covered by this report.
Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information required with respect to our equity compensation plans is set forth in Item 5 of this Form 10‑K.
Other information required by Item 12 of Form 10‑K is hereby incorporated by reference from the earlier filed of: (i) an
amendment to this annual report on Form 10‑K or (ii) the Company’s definitive proxy statement which will be filed
pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the Company’s year-end for the year covered by this report.
Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information required by Item 13 of Form 10‑K is hereby incorporated by reference from the earlier filed of:
(i) an amendment to this annual report on Form 10‑K or (ii) the Company’s definitive proxy statement which will be filed
pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the Company’s year-end for the year covered by this report.
Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by Item 14 of Form 10‑K is hereby incorporated by reference from the earlier filed of:
(i) an amendment to this annual report on Form 10‑K or (ii) the Company’s definitive proxy statement, which will be filed
pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the Company’s year-end for the year covered by this report.
29
Table of Contents
Part IV
Item 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)
The following documents are filed as part of this report:
(1)
Financial Statements.
The following consolidated financial statements of the Company appear on pages F‑1 through F‑24 and are
incorporated by reference into Part II, Item 8:
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(2)
Financial Statement Schedules.
All schedules are omitted because they are either not applicable or the required information is shown in the
financial statements or notes thereto.
(3)
Exhibits.
The information required by this item 15(a)(3) is set forth in the Index to Exhibits accompanying this Annual
Report on Form 10‑K and is hereby incorporated by reference.
30
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT
NO.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
DESCRIPTION
2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated October 8, 2014, by and among Dawson Operating Company (f/k/a
Dawson Geophysical Company), the Registrant and Riptide Acquisition Corp., filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8‑K, filed on October 9, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference.
3.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Formation, as amended February 11, 2015, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the
Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10‑K, filed on March 16, 2015, and incorporated herein by reference.
3.2 Bylaws, as amended February 11, 2015, filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10‑K,
filed on March 16, 2015, and incorporated herein by reference.
4.1 Form of Specimen Stock Certificate, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8‑K, filed
on February 11, 2015, and incorporated herein by reference.
*4.2 Description of Securities.
+10.1 The Executive Nonqualified “Excess” Plan Adoption Agreement, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8‑K, filed on January 8, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference.
+10.2 The Executive Nonqualified Excess Plan Document, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on
Form 8‑K, filed on January 8, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference.
+10.3 Form of Indemnification Agreement entered with directors and executive officers, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8‑K, filed on October 9, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference.
+10.4 Employment Agreement, dated October 8, 2014, by and between the Registrant and Stephen C. Jumper, filed as
Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8‑K, filed on October 9, 2014, and incorporated herein
by reference.
+10.5 Employment Agreement, dated October 8, 2014, by and between the Registrant and Wayne A. Whitener, filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8‑K, filed on October 9, 2014, and incorporated herein
by reference.
+10.6 Letter Agreement, dated June 30, 2019, between Wayne A. Whitener and the Company, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to
the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8‑K, filed on July 1, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference.
+10.7 Employment Agreement, dated October 8, 2014, by and between the Registrant and C. Ray Tobias, filed as
Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8‑K, filed on October 9, 2014, and incorporated herein
by reference.
+10.8 Employment Agreement, dated October 8, 2014, by and between the Registrant and James K. Brata, filed as
Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8‑K, filed on October 9, 2014, and incorporated herein
by reference.
+10.9 Employment Agreement, dated October 8, 2014, by and between the Registrant and James W. Thomas, filed as
Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8‑K, filed on October 9, 2014, and incorporated herein
by reference.
31
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT
NO.
DESCRIPTION
+10.10 Letter Agreement, dated February 15, 2016, by and between James K. Brata and the Company, filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8‑K, filed on February 19, 2016, and incorporated
herein by reference.
+10.11 Letter Agreement, dated February 15, 2016, by and between Stephen C. Jumper and the Company, filed as
Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8‑K (File No. 001‑32472), filed on February 19, 2016,
and incorporated herein by reference.
+10.12 Letter Agreement, dated February 15, 2016, by and between James W. Thomas and the Company, filed as
Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8‑K, filed on February 19, 2016, and incorporated
herein by reference.
+10.13 Letter Agreement, dated February 15, 2016, by and between C. Ray Tobias and the Company, filed as
Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8‑K, filed on February 19, 2016, and incorporated
herein by reference.
+10.14 Letter Agreement, dated February 15, 2016, by and between Wayne A. Whitener and the Company, filed as
Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8‑K, filed on February 19, 2016, and incorporated
herein by reference.
+10.15 Letter Agreement, dated May 4, 2018, by and between James K. Brata and the Company, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to
the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 4, 2018, and incorporated herein by reference.
+10.16 Letter Agreement, dated May 4, 2018, by and between Stephen C. Jumper and the Company, filed as Exhibit
10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 4, 2018, and incorporated herein by
reference.
+10.17 Letter Agreement, dated May 4, 2018, by and between James W. Thomas and the Company, filed as Exhibit
10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 4, 2018, and incorporated herein by
reference.
+10.18 Letter Agreement, dated May 4, 2018, by and between C. Ray Tobias and the Company, filed as Exhibit 10.4 to
the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 4, 2018, and incorporated herein by reference.
+10.19 Amended and Restated Dawson Geophysical Company 2006 Stock and Performance Incentive Plan, filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8‑K, filed on February 11, 2015, and incorporated
herein by reference.
+10.20 Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for the Legacy Dawson Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.5 to Dawson Operating
Company’s (f/k/a Dawson Geophysical Company) Annual Report on Form 10‑K, filed on December 11, 2013
(File No. 001‑34404), and incorporated herein by reference.
+10.21 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for the Legacy Dawson Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.5 to Dawson
Operating Company’s (f/k/a Dawson Geophysical Company) Annual Report on Form 10‑K, filed on
December 11, 2013 (File No. 001‑34404), and incorporated herein by reference.
32
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT
NO.
DESCRIPTION
+10.22 Form of Stock Option Agreement for the Legacy Dawson Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Dawson Operating
Company’s (f/k/a Dawson Geophysical Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q, filed on February 11, 2008
(File No. 001‑34404), and incorporated herein by reference.
+10.23 Form of Stock Option Agreement for the Legacy Dawson Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.9 to Dawson Operating
Company’s (f/k/a Dawson Geophysical Company) Annual Report on Form 10‑K, filed on December 11, 2013
(File No. 001‑34404), and incorporated herein by reference.
+10.24 Dawson Geophysical 2014 Annual Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Dawson Operating Company’s (f/k/a
Dawson Geophysical Company) Current Report on Form 8‑K, filed on November 25, 2013 (File
No. 001‑34404), and incorporated herein by reference.
10.25 Form of Master Geophysical Data Acquisition Agreement, filed as Exhibit 10.10 to Dawson Operating
Company’s (f/k/a Dawson Geophysical Company) Annual Report on Form 10‑K, filed on December 5, 2012
(File No. 001‑34404), and incorporated herein by reference.
10.26 Form of Supplemental Agreement to Master Geophysical Data Acquisition Agreement, filed as Exhibit 10.11
to Dawson Operating Company’s (f/k/a Dawson Geophysical Company) Annual Report on Form 10‑K, filed
on December 5, 2012 (File No. 001‑34404), and incorporated herein by reference.
+10.27 Amended and Restated 2006 Stock Awards Plan of the Company (formerly known as the TGC Industries, Inc.
2006 Stock Awards Plan, i.e., the Legacy TGC Plan), filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8‑K (File No. 001‑32472), filed on June 5, 2015, and incorporated herein by reference.
+10.28 Dawson Geophysical Company 2016 Stock and Performance Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 5, 2016, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.29 Loan and Security Agreement, by and between Dawson Geophysical Company and Dominion Bank, dated
September 30, 2019, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on October 1,
2019, and incorporated herein by reference.
*21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
*23.1 Consent of RSM US LLP, independent registered public accountants to incorporation of report by reference.
*31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002.
*31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002.
*32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002.
*32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS* XBRL Instance Document.
33
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT
NO.
DESCRIPTION
101.SCH* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document.
101.PRE* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
* Filed herewith.
+ Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
34
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant has duly caused this report
to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Midland, and the State of Texas, on
the 6 day of March, 2020.
th
DAWSON GEOPHYSICAL COMPANY
By:
/s/ Stephen C. Jumper
Stephen C. Jumper
Chairman of the Board of Directors
President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on
behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature
/s/ Stephen C. Jumper
Stephen C. Jumper
/s/ William J. Barrett
William J. Barrett
/s/ Craig W. Cooper
Craig W. Cooper
/s/ Gary M. Hoover
Gary M. Hoover
/s/ Michael L. Klofas
Michael L. Klofas
/s/ Ted R. North
Ted R. North
/s/ Mark A. Vander Ploeg
Mark A. Vander Ploeg
/s/ James K. Brata
James K. Brata
Title
President, Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board of Directors
(principal executive officer)
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer, Secretary, and Treasurer
(principal financial and accounting officer)
35
Date
03-06-20
03-06-20
03-06-20
03-06-20
03-06-20
03-06-20
03-06-20
03-06-20
Table of Contents
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Consolidated Financial Statements of Dawson Geophysical Company
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the years ended December 31,
2019, 2018 and 2017
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and
2017
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Page
F‑2
F‑4
F‑5
F‑6
F‑7
F‑8
F-1
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Dawson Geophysical Company
Opinion on the Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited Dawson Geophysical Company's (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in
Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission in 2013.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2019 of the Company and our report dated March 6, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and
for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting in the accompanying Management’s
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are
required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial
reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating
effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes
those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection
of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls
may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures
may deteriorate.
/s/ RSM US LLP
Houston, Texas
March 6, 2020
F-2
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Dawson Geophysical Company
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Dawson Geophysical Company and its
subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of operations and
comprehensive loss, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31,
2019, and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements (collectively, the financial statements).
In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the
Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on
criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission in 2013, and our report dated March 6, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on the
effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm
registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S.
federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the
PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of
material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of
material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to
those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ RSM US LLP
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2016.
Houston, Texas
March 6, 2020
F-3
Table of Contents
DAWSON GEOPHYSICAL COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(amounts in thousands, except share data)
December 31, December 31,
2019
2018
Current assets:
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted cash
Short-term investments
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $250 at December 31, 2019 and
2018
Current maturities of notes receivable
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
$
26,271 $
5,000
2,350
24,356
66
7,575
65,618
284,647
(231,098)
53,549
6,605
1,394
385
57
28,729
—
10,583
25,338
64
12,311
77,025
293,948
(222,407)
71,541
—
1,447
379
293
$
127,608 $
150,685
$
3,952 $
5,427
1,963
3,599
3,481
4,062
1,200
18,257
96
5,940
—
150
6,186
—
—
233
154,235
(49,731)
—
(1,572)
103,165
1,034
3,643
10,501
6,683
—
27,288
6,097
—
134
150
6,381
—
—
230
153,268
(34,518)
—
(1,964)
117,016
$
127,608 $
150,685
Total current assets
Property and equipment
Less accumulated depreciation
Property and equipment, net
Right-of-use assets
Notes receivable, net of current maturities
Intangibles, net
Long-term deferred tax assets, net
Total assets
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable
Accrued liabilities:
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Payroll costs and other taxes
Other
Deferred revenue
Current maturities of notes payable and finance leases
Current maturities of operating lease liabilities
Total current liabilities
Long-term liabilities:
Notes payable and finance leases, net of current maturities
Operating lease liabilities, net of current maturities
Deferred tax liabilities, net
Other accrued liabilities
Total long-term liabilities
Operating commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock-par value $1.00 per share; 4,000,000 shares authorized, none outstanding
Common stock-par value $0.01 per share; 35,000,000 shares authorized,
23,335,855 and 23,018,441 shares issued, and 23,287,410 and 22,969,996
shares outstanding at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively
Additional paid-in capital
Retained deficit
Treasury stock, at cost; 48,445 shares
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net
Total stockholders’ equity
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-4
Table of Contents
DAWSON GEOPHYSICAL COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
Operating revenues
Operating costs:
Operating expenses
General and administrative
Depreciation and amortization
Loss from operations
Other income (expense):
Interest income
Interest expense
Other income (expense)
Loss before income tax
Income tax benefit (expense)
Current
Deferred
Net loss
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Net unrealized income (loss) on foreign exchange rate translation, net
Comprehensive loss
Basic loss per share of common stock
Diluted loss per share of common stock
Year Ended December 31,
2018
154,156
2019
145,773 $
$
$
123,024
17,169
21,826
162,019
132,937
16,287
29,959
179,183
2017
156,532
139,072
16,189
39,235
194,496
(16,246)
(25,027)
(37,964)
548
(435)
681
(15,452)
400
(408)
(170)
(25,205)
216
23
239
41
757
798
306
(158)
712
(37,104)
6,077
(763)
5,314
(15,213)
(24,407)
(31,790)
392
(1,141)
816
(14,821) $
(25,548)
$
(30,974)
(0.66) $
(1.07)
$
(1.40)
(0.66) $
(1.07)
$
(1.40)
$
$
$
Weighted average equivalent common shares outstanding
23,179,257
22,912,217
22,779,377
Weighted average equivalent common shares outstanding - assuming dilution
23,179,257
22,912,217
22,779,377
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-5
Table of Contents
DAWSON GEOPHYSICAL COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(amounts in thousands, except share data)
Common Stock
Number
Of Shares
22,795,039 $
Amount
Accumulated
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
Retained
Earnings
(Deficit)
Other
Comprehensive
(Loss) Income
Total
228 $ 151,185 $
20
21,657 $
(20)
(31,790)
(1,596) $ 171,474
—
(31,790)
Balance December 31, 2016
Impact of adopting ASU 2016-09
Net loss (as adjusted)
Unrealized income on foreign exchange rate translation
Income tax expense
Other comprehensive income
Issuance of common stock under stock compensation
plans
Stock-based compensation expense
Issuance of common stock as compensation
Shares exchanged for taxes on stock-based
compensation
Balance December 31, 2017
Impact of adopting ASU 2018-02
Cash in lieu of fractional shares for stock dividend
Net loss
Unrealized loss on foreign exchange rate translation
Income tax benefit
Other comprehensive loss
Issuance of common stock under stock compensation
plans
Stock-based compensation expense
Issuance of common stock as compensation
Shares exchanged for taxes on stock-based
compensation
92,448
67,498
1
—
(1)
656
320
(28,180)
22,926,805
—
229
(158)
152,022
(101)
51,384
1
59,284
—
(1)
1,037
331
(121)
(18,931)
23,018,441
—
230
153,268
Balance December 31, 2018
Net loss
Unrealized income on foreign exchange rate translation
Income tax expense
Other comprehensive income
Issuance of common stock under stock compensation
plans
Stock-based compensation expense
Issuance of common stock as compensation
Shares exchanged for taxes on stock-based
compensation
263,459
119,556
(65,601)
Balance December 31, 2019
23,335,855 $
1,091
(275)
816
816
—
656
320
(10,153)
43
(1)
(24,407)
(780)
(43)
(158)
141,318
—
(1)
(24,407)
(1,141)
—
(1,141)
(1,141)
(34,518)
(15,213)
(1,964)
504
(112)
392
—
1,037
331
(121)
117,016
(15,213)
392
—
909
297
2
1
(2)
909
296
—
(236)
233 $ 154,235 $ (49,731) $
(236)
(1,572) $ 103,165
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-6
Table of Contents
DAWSON GEOPHYSICAL COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(amounts in thousands)
Year Ended December 31,
2018
2017
2019
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss
$
(15,213) $
(24,407) $
(31,790)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
Operating lease cost
Non-cash compensation
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense
Change in other accrued long-term liabilities
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets
Remeasurement and other
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses and other current assets
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable
Increase (decrease) in accrued liabilities
Decrease in operating lease liabilities
(Decrease) increase in deferred revenue
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures, net of non-cash capital expenditures summarized below
Proceeds from maturity of short-term investments
Acquisition of short-term investments
Proceeds from disposal of assets
Proceeds from flood insurance claims
Proceeds from notes receivable
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from notes payable
Principal payments on notes payable
Principal payments on finance leases
Tax withholdings related to stock-based compensation awards
Cash in lieu of stock dividend paid
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
Net increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period
Supplemental cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest
Cash paid for income taxes
Cash received for income taxes
Non-cash operating, investing and financing activities:
(Decrease) increase in accrued purchases of property and equipment
Finance leases incurred
Increase in right-of-use assets and operating lease liabilities
Decrease in right-of-use assets for accrued rent
Increase in right-of-use assets for prepaid rent
Financed insurance premiums
Equipment sales financed for buyer
Sales tax on equipment sales financed for buyer
21,826
1,201
1,206
(23)
—
(86)
(139)
1,118
6,983
(579)
1,356
(1,150)
(7,020)
9,480
(4,396)
33,075
(24,842)
297
—
51
4,185
—
(8,165)
(2,855)
(236)
—
(11,256)
29,959
—
1,368
(757)
—
16
—
6,744
(2,664)
(798)
(777)
—
4,187
12,871
(15,745)
55,000
(49,000)
437
687
25
(8,596)
6,518
(1,180)
(2,699)
(121)
(1)
2,517
39,235
—
976
763
(1,489)
(1,714)
(91)
(16,465)
278
1,207
1,458
—
929
(6,703)
(8,675)
61,250
(37,583)
1,325
375
96
16,788
—
(2,186)
(1,076)
(158)
—
(3,420)
133
2,542
28,729
31,271 $
(76)
6,716
22,013
28,729 $
724
7,389
14,624
22,013
440 $
40 $
55 $
408 $
14 $
— $
143
—
4,791
(927) $
121 $
8,252 $
(497) $
14 $
2,256 $
— $
— $
353 $
— $
— $
— $
— $
2,317 $
— $
— $
(907)
8,542
—
—
—
248
(1,500)
(132)
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-7
Table of Contents
DAWSON GEOPHYSICAL COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization and Nature of Operations
The Company is a leading provider of onshore seismic data acquisition and processing services. Founded in 1952,
the Company acquires and processes 2-D, 3-D and multi-component seismic data for its clients, ranging from major oil and
gas companies to independent oil and gas operators as well as providers of multi-client data libraries. The Company
operates in the lower 48 states of the U.S. and in Canada.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries,
Dawson Operating LLC, Eagle Canada, Inc., Dawson Seismic Services Holdings, Inc., Eagle Canada Seismic Services
ULC and Exploration Surveys, Inc. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the financial statements, the Company considers demand deposits, certificates of deposit,
overnight investments, money market funds and all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with an initial maturity of
three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Management determines the need for any allowance for doubtful accounts receivable based on its review of past-
due accounts, its past experience of historical write-offs and its current client base. While the collectability of outstanding
client invoices is continually assessed, the inherent volatility of the energy industry’s business cycle can cause swift and
unpredictable changes in the financial stability of the Company’s clients.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment is capitalized at historical cost or the fair value of assets acquired in a business
combination and is depreciated over the useful life of the asset. Management’s estimation of this useful life is based on
circumstances that exist in the seismic industry and information available at the time of the purchase of the asset. As
circumstances change and new information becomes available, these estimates could change.
Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost
and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the balance sheet, and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in the
results of operations for the period.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment when triggering events occur suggesting deterioration in the assets’
recoverability or fair value. Recognition of an impairment charge is required if future expected undiscounted net cash flows
are insufficient to recover the carrying value of the assets, and the fair value of the assets is below the carrying value of the
assets. Management’s forecast of future cash flows used to perform impairment analysis includes estimates of future
revenues and expenses based on the Company’s anticipated future results, while considering anticipated future oil and
natural gas prices which is fundamental in assessing demand for the Company’s services. If the carrying amounts of the
assets exceed the estimated expected undiscounted future cash flows, the Company measures the amount of possible
impairment by comparing the carrying amount of the assets to the fair value. No impairment charges were recognized for
the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.
F-8
Table of Contents
Leases
The Company leases certain vehicles, seismic recording equipment, real property and office equipment under
lease agreements. The Company evaluates each lease to determine its appropriate classification as an operating lease or
finance lease for financial reporting purposes. The Company is the lessee in a lease contract when we obtain the right to
control the asset. The majority of our operating leases are non-cancelable operating leases for office, shop and warehouse
space in Midland, Plano, Denison, Houston, Denver, Oklahoma City and Calgary, Alberta.
The assets and liabilities under finance leases are recorded at the lower of the present value of the minimum lease
payments or the fair market value of the related assets. Assets under finance leases are amortized using the straight-line
method over the initial lease term. Amortization of assets under finance leases is included in depreciation expense.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) requiring organizations that lease assets
to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by those leases. Topic 842
also requires qualitative and quantitative disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand
the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases.
On January 1, 2019, the Company adopted Topic 842 using the optional cumulative-effect transition method of
adoption, under which the new standards were applied prospectively rather than restating the prior periods presented. As a
result, certain accounts lack a comparable value for the same period of 2018 and 2017, specifically accounts and values
associated with operating leases and ROU assets. As a result of adopting the new standard, the Company recorded ROU
assets and operating lease liabilities of approximately $7,769,000 and $8,252,000, respectively, on the consolidated balance
sheet for 2019. The ROU assets equaled the operating lease liabilities, excluding the impact of reclassifying prepaid rent
and deferred rent of approximately $14,000 and $497,000, respectively. These amounts were previously recorded in
prepaid expenses and other current assets and other accrued liabilities, respectively. The new standard did not materially
impact the Company’s results of operation or cash flows.
In addition, the Company made an accounting policy election not to recognize leases with an initial term of 12
months or less and not to separate lease and non-lease components. The Company elected the practical expedients package,
which among other things, allowed the Company to carry forward the historical lease classification. The Company did not
elect the hindsight or land easement practical expedients.
Several of the Company’s leases include options to renew, with renewal terms that can extend from one to 10
years or more. The exercise of lease renewal options is primarily at the Company’s discretion. To measure operating lease
recognition, the Company evaluated its lease agreements to determine if they had economic incentives for renewal or
options to purchase. The Company deems leasehold improvements as one of the few economic incentives that would entice
the Company to renew a lease and all of its leasehold improvements are currently fully amortized.
Where readily determinable, the Company uses the implicit interest rate in determining the present value of future
minimum lease payments. In the absence of an implicit rate, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate based on the
information available at the lease commencement date. The Company gives consideration to its outstanding debt, as well as
publicly available data for instruments with similar characteristics when calculating its incremental borrowing rates. The
Company’s ROU assets are amortized to operating lease cost over the lease terms on a straight-line basis.
Intangibles
The Company has intangible assets consisting primarily of trademarks/tradenames (which are not amortized)
resulting from a business combination. The Company tests for impairment on an annual basis during the fourth quarter, and
between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the
reporting unit below its carrying amount. No impairment charges were recognized for the years ended December 31, 2019,
2018 and 2017.
Revenue Recognition
Services are provided under cancelable service contracts which usually have an original expected duration of one
year or less. These contracts are either “turnkey” or “term” agreements. Under both types of agreements, the Company
recognizes revenues as the services are performed. Revenue is generally recognized based on square miles of data recorded
F-9
Table of Contents
compared to total square miles anticipated to be recorded on the survey using the total estimated revenue for the service
contract. In the case of a cancelled service contract, the client is billed and revenue is recognized for any third party charges
and square miles of data recorded up to the date of cancellation.
The Company receives reimbursements for certain out-of-pocket expenses under the terms of the service
contracts. The amounts billed to clients are included at their gross amount in the total estimated revenue for the service
contract.
Clients are billed as permitted by the service contract. Contract assets and contract liabilities are the result of
timing differences between revenue recognition, billings and cash collections. If billing occurs prior to the revenue
recognition or billing exceeds the revenue recognized, the amount is considered deferred revenue and a contract liability.
Conversely, if the revenue recognition exceeds the billing, the excess is considered an unbilled receivable and a contract
asset. As services are performed, those deferred revenue amounts are recognized as revenue.
In some instances, third-party permitting, surveying, drilling, helicopter, equipment rental and mobilization costs
that directly relate to the contract are utilized to fulfill the contract obligations. These fulfillment costs are capitalized in
other current assets and amortized based on the total square miles of data recorded compared to total square miles
anticipated to be recorded on the survey using the total estimated fulfillment costs for the service contract.
Estimates for total revenue and total fulfillment cost on any service contract are based on significant qualitative
and quantitative judgments. Management considers a variety of factors such as whether various components of the
performance obligation will be performed internally or externally, cost of third party services, and facts and circumstances
unique to the performance obligation in making these estimates.
In May 2014, the FASB issued new guidance related to revenue recognition in which an entity should recognize
revenue when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which
the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Codified as Topic 606, this new guidance also
required disclosures sufficient to enable users to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash
flows arising from contracts with customers.
The Company adopted Topic 606 effective January 1, 2018, using the full retrospective method, which required us
to adjust our consolidated financial statements from amounts previously reported for each prior reporting period presented.
The Company recognized the cumulative effect of adopting the guidance as an adjustment to its opening balance of
retained earnings as of January 1, 2016. The Company elected several ongoing and transitional practical expedients
including (i) to ignore the financing component when estimating the transaction price for service contracts completed
within one year, (ii) to exclude sales tax collected from the customer when determining the transaction price, (iii) to
expense incremental costs to obtain a customer contract if the amortization period for those costs would otherwise be one
year or less, (iv) to not restate contracts that begin and end within the same annual reporting period, (v) to use the
transaction price at the completion of the contract to retrospectively apply the new guidance, and (vi) to not disclose the
remaining performance obligations for the reporting periods presented before the date of initial application. The most
significant impact to the Company of the adoption of Topic 606 relates to the deferred recognition of revenues and
expenses to fulfill contracts with customers until data recording has begun.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company measures all stock-based compensation awards, which include stock options, restricted stock,
restricted stock units and common stock awards, using the fair value method and recognizes compensation expense, net of
actual forfeitures, as operating or general and administrative expense, as appropriate, in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations and Comprehensive Loss on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the related awards.
Foreign Currency Translation
The U.S. Dollar is the reporting currency for all periods presented. The functional currency of the Company’s
foreign subsidiaries is generally the local currency. Any transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional
currency are remeasured with the resulting unrealized gain or loss recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations
and Comprehensive Loss as other income (expense). All assets and liabilities in the functional currency are then translated
into U.S. Dollars at the exchange rate on the balance sheet date. Income and expenses are translated using the exchange
F-10
Table of Contents
rate applicable to each transaction. Equity transactions are translated using historical exchange rates. Adjustments resulting
from translation are recorded as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets. Realized foreign currency transaction gains (losses) are included in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss as other income (expense).
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes by recognizing amounts of taxes payable or refundable for the current
year, and by using an asset and liability approach in recognizing the amount of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the
future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company’s financial statements or tax returns.
Management determines deferred taxes by identifying the types and amounts of existing temporary differences, measuring
the total deferred tax asset or liability using the applicable tax rate in effect for the year in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect of a change in tax rates of deferred tax assets and liabilities is
recognized in income in the year of an enacted rate change. The deferred tax asset is reduced by a valuation allowance if,
based on available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.
Management’s methodology for recording income taxes requires judgment regarding assumptions and the use of estimates,
including determining the annual effective tax rate and the valuation of deferred tax assets, which can create variances
between actual results and estimates and could have a material impact on the Company’s provision or benefit for income
taxes. Due to recent operating losses and valuation allowances, the Company may recognize reduced or no tax benefits on
future losses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. The Company’s effective tax rates
differ from the statutory federal rate of 21% for certain items such as state and local taxes, valuation allowances, non-
deductible expenses and discrete items.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
Preparation of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Because of the use of assumptions and estimates inherent in the reporting process, actual results could differ from
those estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to the year ended December 31, 2017 consolidated financial statements
to conform to the 2019 presentation. These reclassifications had no impact on the consolidated financial statements.
2.
Short-Term Investments
The Company had short-term investments at December 31, 2019 and 2018 consisting of certificates of deposit
with original maturities greater than three months but less than a year. Certificates of deposits with any given banking
institution did not exceed the FDIC insurance limit at December 31, 2019 or 2018.
3. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company’s financial instruments included cash and cash equivalents, short-
term investments in certificates of deposit, accounts receivable, notes receivable, other current assets, accounts payable,
other current liabilities, notes payable and finance leases. At December 31, 2019 the Company’s financial instruments also
included restricted cash and operating leases. Due to the short-term maturities of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash,
accounts receivable, other current assets, accounts payable and other current liabilities, the carrying amounts approximate
fair value at the respective balance sheet dates. The carrying value of the notes receivable, notes payable, finance leases and
operating leases approximate their fair value based on a comparison with the prevailing market interest rates. Due to the
short-term maturities of the Company’s investments in certificates of deposit, the carrying amounts approximate fair value
at the respective balance sheet dates. The fair values of the Company’s notes receivable, notes payable, finance leases,
operating leases and investments in certificates of deposit are level 2 measurements in the fair value hierarchy.
F-11
Table of Contents
4. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment (in thousands), together with the related estimated useful lives at December 31, 2019 and
2018, were as follows:
Land, building and other
Recording equipment
Vibrator energy sources
Vehicles
Less accumulated depreciation
Property and equipment, net
December 31,
2019
2018
$
$
16,611 $
163,564
78,626
25,845
284,647
(231,098)
53,549 $
15,164
171,514
79,168
28,101
293,948
(222,407)
71,541
Useful Lives
3 to 40 years
5 to 10 years
5 to 15 years
1.5 to 10 years
5. Supplemental Consolidated Financial Statement Information
Other current liabilities (in thousands) consist of the following at December 31, 2019 and 2018:
Accrued self-insurance reserves
Other accrued expenses and current liabilities
Other current liabilities
Disaggregated Revenues
December 31,
2019
2018
$
$
2,771
828
3,599
$
$
2,423
1,220
3,643
The Company has one line of business, acquiring and processing seismic data in North America. Our chief
operating decision maker (President, CEO, and Chairman of the Board) makes operating decisions and assesses
performance based on the Company as a whole. Accordingly, the Company is considered to be in a single reportable
segment. The following table presents the Company’s operating revenues (unaudited and in thousands) disaggregated by
geographic region:
Operating Revenues
United States
Canada
Total
Deferred Costs (in thousands)
Year Ended December 31,
2018
2019
2017
$
$
129,452
16,321
145,773
$
$
137,101
17,055
154,156
$
$
134,442
22,090
156,532
Deferred costs were $6,994 and $2,991 at January 1, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The Company’s prepaid
expenses and other current assets at December 31, 2019 and 2018 included deferred costs incurred to fulfill contracts with
customers of $2,525 and $6,994, respectively.
Deferred costs at December 31, 2019 compared to January 1, 2019 decreased primarily as a result of the
completion of several projects for clients with significant deferred fulfillment costs at January 1, 2019. Deferred cost at
December 31, 2018 compared to January 1, 2018 increased primarily as a result of new projects for clients with significant
deferred fulfillment costs at December 31, 2018.
The amount of total deferred costs amortized for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 was $38,468 and
$36,615, respectively. There were no material impairment losses incurred during these periods.
F-12
Table of Contents
Deferred Revenue (in thousands)
Deferred revenue was $10,501 and $6,314 at January 1, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The Company’s deferred
revenue at December 31, 2019 and 2018 was $3,481 and $10,501, respectively.
Deferred revenue at December 31, 2019 compared to January 1, 2019 decreased primarily as a result of
completing multiple large projects for clients throughout the year. Deferred revenue at December 31, 2018 compared to
January 1, 2018 increased primarily as a result of new projects for clients with large third party reimbursables where data
has not yet been recorded.
Revenue recognized for the year ended December 31, 2019 that was included in the contract liability balance at
the beginning of 2019 was $10,501. Revenue recognized for the year ended December 31, 2018 that was included in the
contract liability balance at the beginning of 2018 was $5,945. Deferred revenue not recognized during either year relates
to projects that have not yet started or were cancelled.
6. Debt
On September 30, 2019, the Company entered into a new Loan Agreement with Dominion Bank. The Loan
Agreement provides for a Revolving Credit Facility in an amount up to the lesser of (i) $15,000,000 or (ii) a sum equal to
(a) 80% of the Company’s eligible accounts receivable plus 100% of the amount on deposit with the Lender in the
Company’s collateral account, consisting of a restricted CDARS account of $5,000,000.
Dominion Loan Agreement
Under the Revolving Credit Facility, interest will accrue at an annual rate equal to the lesser of (i) 6.00% and (ii)
the greater of (a) the prime rate as published from time to time in The Wall Street Journal or (b) 3.50%. The Company will
pay a commitment fee of 0.10% per annum on the difference of (a) $15,000,000 minus the Deposit minus (b) the daily
average usage of the Revolving Credit Facility. The Loan Agreement contains customary covenants for credit facilities of
this type, including limitations on disposition of assets. The Company is also obligated to meet certain financial covenants
under the Loan Agreement, including maintaining a tangible net worth of $75,000,000 and specified ratios with respect to
current assets and liabilities and debt to tangible net worth. The Company’s obligations under the Loan Agreement are
secured by a security interest in the collateral account (including the Deposit) with the Lender and future accounts
receivable and related collateral. As of December 31, 2019, the Company has not borrowed any amounts under the
Revolving Credit Facility. The maturity date of the Loan Agreement is September 30, 2020.
The Company does not currently have any notes payable under the Revolving Credit Facility.
Veritex Credit Agreement
On September 30, 2019, the Company’s Veritex Line of Credit under the Veritex Loan Agreement by and between
the Company and Veritex matured pursuant to its terms. No amounts were borrowed under the Veritex Line of Credit. In
connection with the maturity of the Veritex Line of Credit and entry into the Loan Agreement with Dominion Bank, the
Company paid off all amounts owed pursuant to the term loan under the Veritex Loan Agreement of $4,355,665.
Veritex Letters of Credit
As of December 31, 2019, Veritex has issued two letters of credit under the Veritex Loan Agreement. The first
letter of credit is in the amount of $1,767,000 to support payment of the Company’s insurance obligations. The second
letter of credit is in the amount of $583,000 to support the Company’s workers compensation insurance. Each of the letters
of credit are secured by a certificate of deposit with Veritex.
Other Indebtedness
As of December 31, 2019, the Company has two notes payable to a finance company for various insurance
premiums totaling $1,746,000.
F-13
Table of Contents
In addition, the Company leases certain seismic recording equipment and vehicles under leases classified
as finance leases. The Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 include finance leases
of $2,412,000 and $5,125,000, respectively.
Maturities of Debt
The Company’s aggregate principal amount (in thousands) of outstanding notes payable and the interest rates and
monthly payments as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 are as follows:
Notes payable to commercial banks
Aggregate principal amount outstanding
Interest rate
Notes payable to finance company for insurance
Aggregate principal amount outstanding
Interest rate
December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
$
$
—
—
5,975
5.00%
December 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
$
1,746
4.05% - 4.99%
$
1,680
3.80%
The Company’s aggregate maturities of finance leases (in thousands) at December 31, 2019 are as follows:
January 2020 - December 2020
January 2021 - December 2021
January 2022 - December 2022
January 2023 - December 2023
Finance lease obligations
Interest rates on these leases ranged from 4.65% to 5.37%.
7. Leases
$
$
2,316
53
36
7
2,412
The Company leases certain vehicles, seismic recording equipment, real property and office equipment under
lease agreements. The Company evaluates each lease to determine its appropriate classification as an operating lease or
finance lease for financial reporting purposes. The Company is the lessee in a lease contract when we obtain the right to
control the asset. The majority of our operating leases are non-cancelable operating leases for office, shop and warehouse
space in Midland, Plano, Denison, Houston, Denver, Oklahoma City and Calgary, Alberta.
On January 1, 2019, the Company adopted Topic 842 using the optional cumulative-effect transition method of
adoption, under which the new standards were applied prospectively rather than restating the prior periods presented. As a
result, certain accounts lack a comparable value for the same period of 2018 and 2017, specifically accounts and values
associated with operating leases and ROU assets.
F-14
Table of Contents
The components of lease cost (in thousands) for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was as
follows:
Finance lease cost
Amortization of right-of-use assets
Interest on lease liabilities
Total finance lease cost
Operating lease cost
Short-term lease cost
Total lease cost
2019
Year Ended December 31,
2018
2017
$
$
1,424 $
177
1,601
1,429 $
303
1,732
1,586
1,607
—
3,187 $
—
3,339 $
506
123
629
1,716
—
2,345
Supplemental cash flow information related to leases (in thousands) for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018
and 2017 was as follows:
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease
liabilities
Operating cash flows from operating leases
Operating cash flows from finance leases
Financing cash flows from finance leases
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations
Operating leases
Finance leases
$
$
$
$
$
2019
Year Ended December 31,
2018
2017
(1,505) $
(184) $
(2,855) $
8,252 $
121 $
(1,594) $
(308) $
(2,699) $
— $
— $
(1,534)
(108)
(1,076)
—
—
F-15
Table of Contents
Supplemental balance sheet information related to leases (in thousands) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 was as
follows:
Operating leases
Operating lease right-of-use assets
Operating lease liabilities - current
Operating lease liabilities - long-term
Total operating lease liabilities
Finance leases
Property and equipment, at cost
Accumulated depreciation
Property and equipment, net
Finance lease liabilities - current
Finance lease liabilities - long-term
Total finance lease liabilities
Weighted average remaining lease term
Operating leases
Finance leases
Weighted average discount rate
Operating leases
Finance leases
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
December 31,
2019
2018
6,605
1,200
5,940
7,140
8,663
(3,297)
5,366
2,316
96
2,412
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
6.3 years
0.8 years
5.04%
4.67%
—
—
—
—
8,542
(1,922)
6,620
2,830
2,295
5,125
7.3 years
1.8 years
—
4.65%
Maturities of lease liabilities (in thousands) at December 31, 2019 are as follows:
January 2020 - December 2020
January 2021 - December 2021
January 2022 - December 2022
January 2023 - December 2023
January 2024 - December 2024
Thereafter
Total payments under lease agreements
Less imputed interest
Total lease liabilities
8. Stock-Based Compensation
Operating Leases
Finance Leases
$
$
$
1,531
1,348
1,157
1,168
1,175
2,001
8,380
(1,240)
7,140
$
2,367
56
37
8
—
—
2,468
(56)
2,412
Since the date of its effectiveness on May 5, 2016, the Company issues new grants of stock-based awards pursuant
to the Dawson Geophysical Company 2016 Stock and Performance Incentive Plan (the “2016 Plan”). All of the Company’s
prior plans have expired pursuant to their terms and no awards previously granted under prior plans remain outstanding.
The awards outstanding and available under the 2016 Plan and their associated accounting treatment are discussed below.
In 2016, the Company adopted the 2016 Plan, which provides for the issuance of up to 1,000,000 shares of
authorized Company common stock. As of December 31, 2019, there were approximately 330,861 shares available for
future issuance. The 2016 Plan provides for the issuance of stock-based compensation awards, including stock options,
common stock, restricted stock, restricted stock units and other forms. Stock option grant prices awarded under the 2016
F-16
Table of Contents
Plan may not be less than the fair market value of the common stock subject to such option on the grant date, and the term
of stock options shall extend no more than ten years after the grant date. The 2016 Plan terminates May 5, 2026.
Historically, the Company’s employees and officers that held unvested restricted stock were entitled to dividends
when the Company paid dividends. The Company’s employees and officers that hold unvested restricted stock awarded
during 2016 or thereafter are not entitled to dividends when the Company pays dividends.
Impact of Stock-Based Compensation
The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense (in thousands), which is included in operating
or general and administrative expense, as appropriate, in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive
Loss for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:
Restricted stock awards
Restricted stock unit awards
Common stock awards
Total compensation expense
Stock Options
2019
Year Ended December 31,
2018
2017
$
$
893 $
15
297
1,205 $
915 $
122
331
1,368 $
495
161
320
976
A summary of the outstanding stock options as of December 31, 2019 as well as activity during the year then
ended is as follows:
Balance as of December 31, 2018
Forfeited
Expired
Balance as of December 31, 2019
Exercisable as of December 31, 2019
Number of Stock
Options
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
87,497 $
— $
(87,497) $
— $
— $
11.23
—
11.23
—
—
Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
in Years
—
—
Stock options issued under prior plans were a combination of incentive stock options and non-qualified stock
options. For incentive stock options, no tax deduction is recorded when options are awarded. If an exercise and sale of
vested options results in a disqualifying disposition, a tax deduction for the Company occurs.
Outstanding options at December 31, 2018 expired in July 2019. There were no unrecognized compensation costs
related to stock options as of December 31, 2019.
There were no options granted or vested and no excess tax benefits from disqualifying dispositions during the
years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017. No options were exercised during the years ended December 31, 2019,
2018 and 2017. No cash was received from option exercises during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Restricted Stock Awards
There were no restricted stock grants in the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017. The fair value of
restricted stock awards equals the market price of the Company’s stock on the grant date and the awards generally vest in
one to three years or in annual increments over three years.
F-17
Table of Contents
A summary of the status of the Company’s nonvested restricted stock awards as of December 31, 2019 and
activity during the year then ended is as follows:
Nonvested as of December 31, 2018
Vested
Nonvested as of December 31, 2019
Number of Restricted
Stock Awards
65,974
(65,974)
—
Weighted Average
Grant Date Fair Value
3.65
$
3.65
$
—
$
As of December 31, 2019, there are no unrecognized compensation costs related to nonvested restricted stock
awards.
The aggregate vesting date fair value of restricted stock for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
was $255,000, $48,000 and $84,000, respectively.
Restricted Stock Unit Awards
The Company did not grant any restricted stock units for the year ended December 31, 2019. The Company
granted 268,000 and 238,350 restricted stock unit awards during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017,
respectively, with a weighted average grant date fair value of $7.14 and $3.96, respectively. The fair value of restricted
stock unit awards equals the market price of the Company’s stock on the grant date and the awards generally vest in one to
three years or in annual increments over three years.
A summary of the Company’s nonvested restricted stock unit awards as of December 31, 2019 and activity during
the year then ended is as follows:
Nonvested as of December 31, 2018
Granted
Vested
Forfeited
Nonvested as of December 31, 2019
Number of Restricted
Stock Unit Awards
627,085
—
(197,485)
(19,500)
410,100
Weighted Average
Grant Date Fair Value
5.03
$
$
—
3.74
$
5.41
$
5.64
$
As of December 31, 2019, there were approximately $871,000 of unrecognized compensation costs related to
nonvested restricted stock unit awards. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.00
years.
The aggregate vesting date fair value of restricted stock units for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and
2017 was $710,000, $273,000 and $422,000, respectively.
Common Stock Awards
The Company granted common stock awards with immediate vesting to outside directors and employees during
the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 as follows:
Year ended December 31, 2019
Year ended December 31, 2018
Year ended December 31, 2017
9. Dividends
Number of Common
Stock Awards
119,556
59,284
67,498
Weighted Average
Grant Date Fair Value
2.48
$
5.59
$
4.74
$
The Company did not issue any stock dividends during calendar years 2019 or 2017. The Board of Directors
approved a 5% stock dividend (or 0.05 share for each share outstanding) on the outstanding shares of our common stock on
May 1, 2018. The stock dividend was paid on May 29, 2018 to shareholders of record on May 14, 2018.
F-18
Table of Contents
The Company has not paid cash dividends during calendar years 2019, 2018 and 2017. While there are currently
no restrictions prohibiting the Company from paying cash dividends, the Board of Directors, after consideration of
economic and market conditions affecting the energy industry in general, and the oilfield services business in particular,
determined that the Company would not pay a cash dividend in respect of the Company’s common stock for the foreseeable
future. Payment of any type of dividends in the future will be at the discretion of the Company’s board and will depend on
our financial condition, results of operations, capital and legal requirements, and other factors deemed relevant by the
board.
10. Employee Benefit Plans
The Company provides a 401(k) plan as part of its employee benefits package in order to retain quality personnel.
The Company elected to match 100% of the employee contributions up to a maximum of 6% of the participant’s applicable
compensation under its 401(k) plan for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017. The Company’s matching
contributions under its 401(k) plan for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 were approximately $1,340,000,
$1,505,000 and $1,480,000, respectively.
11. Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are charged to expense as incurred. Advertising costs for the years ended December 31, 2019,
2018 and 2017 totaled $351,000, $498,000 and $371,000, respectively.
12. Income Taxes
The Company’s components of loss before income tax (in thousands) are as follows:
Domestic
Foreign
Loss before income tax
2019
Year Ended December 31,
2018
2017
$
$
(14,097)
(1,355)
(15,452)
$
$
(20,577)
(4,628)
(25,205)
$
$
(32,238)
(4,866)
(37,104)
The Company’s components of income tax benefit (in thousands) are as follows:
Current federal benefit
Current state (expense) benefit
Current foreign benefit
Deferred federal expense
Deferred state benefit
Deferred foreign benefit (expense)
Income tax benefit
2019
Year Ended December 31,
2018
2017
285
(69)
—
(251)
127
147
239
$
$
55
(14)
—
(274)
344
687
798
$
$
40
3,545
2,492
(51)
697
(1,409)
5,314
$
$
The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was enacted on December 22, 2017 resulting in significant changes to the
Internal Revenue Code. This reform changed the U.S. Statutory tax rate from 35% to 21% for tax years beginning after
December 31, 2017. The Company was required to recognize the effect of the tax law changes in the period of enactment,
such as remeasuring the domestic deferred tax assets and liabilities as well as reassessing the net realizability of deferred
tax assets and liabilities. Due to the Company’s current loss position and valuation allowances, the tax reform did not have
a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In December 2017, the SEC staff issued Accounting Bulletin No. 118, Income Tax Accounting Implications of the
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“SAB 118”), which allows companies to record provisional amounts during a measurement period
not to extend beyond one year from the enactment date. The Tax Cuts and Jobs act was enacted in late fourth quarter of
2017 and provisional amounts were recorded. Subsequent guidance was received throughout the year and the accounting of
deferred tax remeasurement was completed in accordance with SAB 118. Adjustments did not have a material impact
F-19
Table of Contents
on the Company’s consolidated financial statements due to the domestic loss position and the associated valuation
allowances on the domestic deferred tax assets.
The income tax provision (in thousands) differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory federal
income tax rate to loss before income tax as follows:
Tax benefit computed at statutory rate of 21% and 35% (1)
Change in valuation allowance
State income tax benefit, net of federal tax
Foreign loss
Tax reform impact to deferred tax balances (2)
Other
Income tax benefit
$
$
2019
Year Ended December 31,
2018
2017
3,245
(5,744)
46
2,827
—
(135)
239
$
$
5,293
(5,811)
260
1,319
—
(263)
798
$
$
12,986
(4,747)
2,757
1,593
(7,590)
315
5,314
(1)
(2)
Statutory rate of 21% for years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 and 35% for year ended December 31, 2017.
Due to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted on December 22, 2017, the Company’s domestic deferred tax assets and
liabilities were remeasured from 35% to 21% as of December 31, 2017. The change in tax rate resulted in a
decrease to the gross domestic deferred tax asset which is offset by a corresponding decrease to the valuation
allowance.
The principal components of the Company’s net deferred tax assets (liabilities) (in thousands) are as follows:
Deferred tax assets:
Federal tax net operating loss ("NOL") carryforward
Foreign tax NOL carryforward
State tax NOL carryforward
Other comprehensive income
Deferred revenue
Restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards
Foreign deferred taxes
Right-of-use assets
Canadian start-up costs
Self-insurance
Workers’ compensation
Alternative Minimum Tax ("AMT") credit carryforward
Other
Gross deferred tax assets
Less valuation allowances
Net deferred tax assets
Deferred tax liabilities:
Property and equipment
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)
Domestic deferred tax assets
Foreign deferred tax liabilities
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)
December 31,
2019
2018
25,921
6,418
1,692
379
351
316
242
193
122
106
96
79
90
36,005
(28,299)
7,706
(7,649)
57
57
—
57
$
$
$
$
24,848
5,298
2,134
490
697
320
466
—
137
111
60
315
92
34,968
(22,806)
12,162
(12,003)
159
293
(134)
159
$
$
$
$
At December 31, 2019, the Company had a NOL for U.S. federal income tax purposes of approximately
$123,434,000. This NOL will begin to expire in 2027. Losses incurred after the year ended December 31, 2017 have no
expiration. The Company will carry forward the tax benefits related to federal NOL of approximately $25,921,000. The
F-20
Table of Contents
Company also had state NOL’s that will affect state taxes of approximately $1,692,000 at December 31, 2019. State NOL’s
began to expire in 2015. The Company also had a Canadian NOL of $24,683,000 that will begin to expire in 2037.
In evaluating the possible sources of taxable income during 2019, the Company determined it is more likely than
not that the remaining deferred tax assets will not be realizable. As a result, the Company recorded full valuation allowance
against foreign deferred tax assets and its federal and state deferred tax assets with the exception of its trademark intangible
and the remaining AMT credit which will be refundable within the next three years.
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company did not have any uncertain tax positions. The Company’s policy is
to recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax position in income tax expense.
13. Net Loss per Share
Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average shares outstanding. Diluted
loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average diluted shares outstanding.
The computation of basic and diluted loss per share (in thousands, except share and per share data) is as follows:
2019
Year Ended December 31,
2018
2017
Net loss
Weighted average common shares outstanding
Basic
Dilutive common stock options, restricted stock unit awards
and restricted stock awards
Diluted
Basic loss per share of common stock
Diluted loss per share of common stock
$
(15,213)
$
(24,407)
$
(31,790)
23,179,257
22,912,217
22,779,377
—
23,179,257
(0.66)
(0.66)
$
$
—
22,912,217
(1.07)
(1.07)
$
$
—
22,779,377
(1.40)
(1.40)
$
$
The Company had a net loss in the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017. As a result, all stock options,
restricted stock unit awards, and restricted stock awards were anti-dilutive and excluded from weighted average shares used
in determining the diluted loss per share of common stock for the respective periods.
The following weighted average numbers of stock options, restricted stock unit awards, and restricted stock
awards, in each case as adjusted for the 5% stock dividend paid to shareholders on May 29, 2018, have been excluded from
the calculation of diluted loss per share of common stock, as their effect would be anti-dilutive for the years ended
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:
Stock options
Restricted stock units
Restricted stock awards
Total
2019
Year Ended December 31,
2018
2017
50,580
456,817
8,133
515,530
240,700
552,458
67,052
860,210
355,264
348,826
76,960
781,050
F-21
Table of Contents
14. Major Clients
The Company operates in only one business segment, contract seismic data acquisition and processing
services. Sales to these clients, as a percentage of operating revenues that exceeded 10%, were as follows:
A
B
C
D
E
F
Year Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
18%
16%
15%
11%
—
—
—
—
10%
—
22%
—
—
—
—
—
17%
10%
15. Areas of Operation
The U.S. and Canada are the only countries of operation for the Company.
Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2019 were approximately $145,773,000, of which $129,452,000 was
earned in the U.S. and $16,321,000 was earned in Canada. Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2018 were
approximately $154,156,000, of which $137,101,000 was earned in the U.S. and $17,055,000 was earned in Canada.
Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2017 were approximately $156,532,000, of which $134,442,000 was earned in
the U.S. and $22,090,000 was earned in Canada.
Net property and equipment as of December 31, 2019 was approximately $53,549,000, of which $45,653,000 was
located in the U.S. and $7,896,000 was located in Canada. Net right-of-use assets as of December 31, 2019 were
approximately $6,605,000, of which $5,893,000 was located in the U.S. and $712,000 was located in Canada. Net property
and equipment as of December 31, 2018 was approximately $71,541,000, of which $62,033,000 was located in the U.S.
and $9,508,000 was located in Canada.
16. Commitments and Contingencies
From time to time, the Company is a party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business.
Although the Company cannot predict the outcomes of any such legal proceedings, management believes that the
resolution of pending legal actions will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of
operations or liquidity, as the Company believes it is adequately indemnified and insured.
We are also party to the following legal proceeding: On April 1, 2019, Weatherford International, LLC and
Weatherford U.S., L.P. (collectively, “Weatherford”) filed a petition in state district court for Midland County, Texas, in
which the Company and eighteen other parties were named as defendants, alleging the Company and/or the other named
defendants contributed
to or caused contamination of groundwater at and around property owned by
Weatherford. Weatherford is seeking declaratory judgment, recovery and contribution for past and future costs incurred in
responding to or correcting the contamination at and around the property from each defendant. The Company disputes
Weatherford’s allegations with respect to the Company and intends to vigorously defend itself in this case. Subsequent to
the filing of the petition, Weatherford filed for bankruptcy protection on July 1, 2019. While the outcome and impact of this
legal proceeding on the Company cannot be predicted with certainty, based on currently available information,
management believes that the resolution of this proceeding will not have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition, results of operations or liquidity.
Additionally, the Company experiences contractual disputes with its clients from time to time regarding the
payment of invoices or other matters. While the Company seeks to minimize these disputes and maintain good relations
with its clients, the Company has experienced in the past, and may experience in the future, disputes that could affect its
revenues and results of operations in any period.
As of December 31, 2019, Veritex has issued two letters of credit under the Veritex Loan Agreement. The first
letter of credit is in the amount of $1,767,000 to support payment of certain insurance obligations of the Company. The
F-22
Table of Contents
second letter of credit is in the amount of $583,000 to support the Company’s workers compensation insurance. Each of the
letters of credit are secured by a certificate of deposit with Veritex.
17. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, Income Taxes (“Topic 740”): Simplifying the Accounting
for Income Taxes, which simplifies the accounting for income taxes by eliminating certain exceptions to the general
principles in Topic 740 and by clarifying and amending existing guidance to improve consistent application. This ASU is
effective for the annual period beginning after December 15, 2020, including interim periods within that annual period.
Certain amendments within this ASU are required to be applied on a retrospective basis for all periods presented; others are
to be applied using a modified retrospective approach with a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings, if any, as of
the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is adopted; and yet others are to be applied using either
basis. All other amendments not specified in the ASU should be applied on a prospective basis. Early adoption is permitted.
An entity that elects to early adopt in an interim period should reflect any adjustments as of the beginning of the annual
period that includes that interim period. Additionally, an entity that elects early adoption must adopt all the amendments in
the same period. The Company is currently evaluating the new guidance to determine the impact it will have on its
consolidated financial statements.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326):
Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which requires entities to measure expected credit losses for
certain financial assets using a new, forward-looking current expected credit loss model (“CECL”) that will result in the
earlier recognition of allowances for losses. CECL is based on historical experience, adjusted for current conditions and
reasonable and supportable forecasts. This ASU is effective for the annual period beginning after December 15, 2019,
including interim periods within that annual period using a modified retrospective approach with a cumulative-effect
adjustment to retained earnings for additional loss allowances, if any, as of the beginning of the first reporting period in
which the guidance is adopted. The Company’s financial instruments within the scope of this guidance primarily includes
trade receivables, and the Company does not expect a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-07, Compensation – Stock Compensation (“Topic 718”):
Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which expands the scope of Topic 718 to include share-
based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from nonemployees except for certain circumstances. Any
transition impact will be a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the year of adoption.
This ASU is effective for the annual period beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within that
annual period and early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2019 and it did
not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework
– Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, which modifies the disclosure requirements on fair
value measurement by removing, modifying, and adding certain disclosures. This ASU is effective for the annual period
beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within that annual period. The adoption of this guidance will
not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In August 2018, the SEC adopted amendments to simplify certain disclosure requirements, as set forth in
Securities Act Release No. 33-10532, Disclosure Update and Simplification, which includes a requirement for entities to
present the changes in shareholders’ equity in the interim financial statements in quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. This
amendment is effective for all filings made on or after November 5, 2018. In light of the timing of effectiveness of the
amendment and proximity to the filing date for most filers’ quarterly reports, the SEC allowed for a filer’s first presentation
of the changes in shareholders’ equity to be included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter that begins after the effective date.
The Company adopted the SEC’s delayed implementation option and began presenting the changes in shareholders’ equity
on an interim basis in the first quarter of 2019.
18. Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially expose the Company to concentrations of credit risk at any given time may
consist of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, money market funds and overnight investment accounts, short-term
investments in certificates of deposit, trade and other receivables and other current assets. At December 31, 2019 and 2018,
the Company had deposits with domestic and international banks in excess of federally insured limits. Management
F-23
Table of Contents
believes the credit risk associated with these deposits is minimal. Money market funds seek to preserve the value of the
investment, but it is possible to lose money investing in these funds.
The Company’s sales are to clients whose activities relate to oil and natural gas exploration and production. The
Company generally extends unsecured credit to these clients; therefore, collection of receivables may be affected by the
economy surrounding the oil and natural gas industry or other economic conditions. The Company closely monitors
extensions of credit and may negotiate payment terms that mitigate risk.
19. Quarterly Consolidated Financial Data (unaudited and in thousands, except per share data)
March 31,
June 30,
September 30, December 31,
Quarter Ended
Year ended December 31, 2019:
Operating revenues
(Loss) income from operations
Net (loss) income
Basic (loss) income per share of common
stock
Diluted (loss) income per share of common
stock
Year ended December 31, 2018:
Operating revenues
Loss from operations
Net loss
Basic loss per share of common stock
Diluted loss per share of common stock
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
51,164 $
(317) $
(137) $
24,076 $
(11,622) $
(11,246) $
36,976 $
1,911 $
1,998 $
33,557
(6,218)
(5,828)
(0.01) $
(0.49) $
0.09 $
(0.25)
(0.01) $
(0.49) $
0.09 $
(0.25)
49,880 $
(1,640) $
(1,709) $
(0.07) $
(0.07) $
36,158 $
(6,291) $
(5,711) $
(0.25) $
(0.25) $
40,448 $
(5,234) $
(5,171) $
(0.23) $
(0.23) $
27,670
(11,862)
(11,816)
(0.51)
(0.51)
Basic and diluted (loss) income per share of common stock are computed independently for each of the quarters
presented. Therefore, the sum of quarterly basic and diluted information may not equal the annual basic and diluted loss per
share of common stock.
F-24
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES
Exhibit 4.2
As of December 31, 2019, Dawson Geophysical Company (the “Company”) had one class of securities
registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”): common
stock, par value $0.01 per share, listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol “DWSN.”
The following description of our common stock is a summary and does not purport to be complete. It is
subject to and qualified in its entirety by reference to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Formation
(the “Certificate of Formation”) and the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws (as amended, the “Bylaws”),
which are exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and are incorporated by reference herein. The following
description may not contain all of the information that is important to you. To understand them fully, you should read
the Company’s Certificate of Formation and Bylaws, as amended, and the applicable provisions of the Texas Business
Organizations Code.
Authorized Capital Stock
The Company’s authorized capital stock consists of 35,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per
share, and 4,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share. As of March 4, 2020, there were 23,287,410
shares of common stock outstanding and zero shares of preferred stock outstanding.
Common Stock
Dividend Rights
We can pay dividends if, as and when declared by our Board of Directors, subject to compliance with limitations
imposed by law. The holders of our common stock will be entitled to receive and share equally in these dividends as
they may be declared by our Board of Directors out of funds legally available for such purpose. If we issue preferred
stock, the holders of such preferred stock may have a priority over the holders of the common stock with respect to
dividends.
Voting Rights
Each holder of our common stock is entitled to one vote per share and will not have any right to cumulate votes in the
election of directors. Directors will be elected by a plurality of the shares actually voting on the matter. If we issue
preferred stock, holders of the preferred stock may also possess voting rights.
Liquidation Rights
In the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, whether voluntary or involuntary, the holders of
our common stock would be entitled to receive, after payment or provision for payment of all its debts and liabilities,
all of the assets of the Company available for distribution. If preferred stock is issued, the holders thereof may have a
priority over the holders of the common stock in the event of a liquidation or dissolution.
Preferred Stock
Our Board of Directors is authorized to fix and determine the relative rights and preferences of the shares of any series
of our preferred stock and to provide for the issuance of the preferred stock. The holders of our preferred stock may
have preferences over holders of our common stock in the payment of dividends, upon liquidation of the Company, in
respect of voting rights and in the redemption of the capital stock of the Company. Series of preferred stock issued by
the Company may also, in the discretion of our Board of Directors, be made convertible into our common stock or
other securities and may have sinking fund requirements.
Our Certificate of Formation and Bylaws; Anti-Takeover Effects of Texas Law
Authorized but Unissued Capital Stock
We have authorized but unissued shares of preferred stock and common stock, and our board of directors may
authorize the issuance of one or more series of preferred stock without shareholder approval.
Board Classification
If our Board of Directors were increased to nine (9) directors, it may, by resolution, divide into three equal classes. If
our Board of Directors effects a board classification, the directors in each class will serve for a three-year term, one
class being elected each year by our shareholders. In addition, our Certificate of Formation provides that directors may
only be removed for cause by the affirmative vote of the holders of eighty percent (80%) or more of the outstanding
shares of common stock of the Company. Additionally, the provisions in our Certificate of Formation concerning the
supermajority vote for director removal may not be amended, altered, changed or repealed in any respect unless such
action is approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of eighty percent (80%) or more of the outstanding shares of
our common stock.
Supermajority Vote for Certain Business Combinations
Our Certificate of Formation provides that the affirmative vote of the holders of eighty percent (80%) of the
outstanding shares of our common stock is required for the approval or authorization of (1) any merger or
consolidation of the Company with or into another corporation or entity or (2) any sale of all or substantially all of the
Company’s assets to another corporation or entity. Additionally, the provisions in our Certificate of Formation
concerning the supermajority vote for certain business combinations may not be amended, altered, changed or repealed
in any respect unless such action is approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of eighty percent (80%) or more of
the outstanding shares of our common stock.
Requirements for Advance Notification of Shareholder Nominations and Proposals
Our Bylaws establish advance notice procedures with respect to shareholder proposals and the nomination of
candidates for election as directors, other than nominations made by or at the direction of our Board of Directors.
Ability of the Board of Directors to Amend or Repeal the Bylaws
Our Certificate of Formation vests the power to alter, amend or repeal the Bylaws in our Board of Directors. The
Bylaws provide that this power is subject to repeal or change by action of our shareholders.
Business Combinations under Texas Law
A number of provisions of Texas law, our Certificate of Formation and Bylaws could make more difficult the
acquisition of the Company by means of a tender offer, a proxy contest or otherwise and the removal of incumbent
officers and directors. These provisions are intended to discourage coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover
bids and to encourage persons seeking to acquire control of the Company to negotiate first with our Board of
Directors.
We are subject to the provisions of Title 2, Chapter 21, Subchapter M of the Texas Business Organizations Code (the
“Texas Business Combination Law”). That law provides that a Texas corporation may not engage in specified types of
business combinations, including mergers, consolidations and asset sales, with a person, or an affiliate or associate of
that person, who is an “affiliated shareholder.” An “affiliated shareholder” is generally defined as (i) the holder of 20%
or more of the corporation’s voting shares or (ii) a person who, during the preceding three year period, was a holder of
20% or more of the corporation’s voting shares. The law’s prohibitions do not apply if:
·
the business combination or the acquisition of shares by the affiliated shareholder was approved by the board
of directors of the corporation before the affiliated shareholder became an affiliated shareholder; or
·
the business combination was approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds of the
outstanding voting shares of the corporation not beneficially owned by the affiliated shareholder, at a meeting
of shareholders called for that purpose, not less than six months after the affiliated shareholder became an
affiliated shareholder.
Because we have a class of voting shares registered under the Exchange Act, we are considered an “issuing public
corporation” for purposes of this law. The Texas Business Combination Law does not apply to the following:
·
·
·
·
the business combination of an issuing public corporation: where the corporation’s original charter or bylaws
contain a provision expressly electing not to be governed by the Texas Business Combination Law; or that
adopts an amendment to its charter or bylaws, by the affirmative vote of the holders, other than affiliated
shareholders, of at least two-thirds of the outstanding voting shares of the corporation, expressly electing not
to be governed by the Texas Business Combination Law and so long as the amendment does not take effect
for 18 months following the date of the vote and does not apply to a business combination with an affiliated
shareholder who became affiliated on or before the effective date of the amendment;
a business combination of an issuing public corporation with an affiliated shareholder that became an
affiliated shareholder inadvertently, if the affiliated shareholder divests itself, as soon as possible, of enough
shares to no longer be an affiliated shareholder and would not at any time within the three-year period
preceding the announcement of the business combination have been an affiliated shareholder but for the
inadvertent acquisition;
a business combination with an affiliated shareholder who became an affiliated shareholder through a transfer
of shares by will or intestacy and continuously was an affiliated shareholder until the announcement date of
the business combination; and
a business combination of a corporation with its wholly owned Texas subsidiary if the subsidiary is not an
affiliate or associate of the affiliated shareholder other than by reason of the affiliated shareholder’s beneficial
ownership of voting shares of the corporation.
Neither our Certificate of Formation nor our Bylaws contain any provision expressly providing that we will not be
subject to the Texas Business Combination Law. The Texas Business Combination Law may have the effect of
inhibiting a non-negotiated merger or other business combination involving the Company, even if that event would be
beneficial to our shareholders.
Transfer Agent and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC. The
transfer agent’s address is 6201 15th Avenue, Brooklyn, New York 11219 and its telephone number is (800) 937-5449.
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
Exhibit 21.1
Dawson Operating LLC, a Texas limited liability company
Eagle Canada, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Dawson Seismic Services Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Eagle Canada Seismic Services ULC, a Canadian corporation
Exploration Surveys, Inc., a Texas corporation
Exhibit 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-199922) pertaining to the Post-Effective Amendment to the
Registration Statement on Form S-4 related to the Amended and Restated Dawson Geophysical
Company 2006 Stock and Performance Incentive Plan (the "Legacy Dawson Plan"),
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-142221) pertaining to the TGC Industries, Inc. 2006 Stock
Awards Plan (the "Legacy TGC Plan"),
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-201923) pertaining to the Legacy TGC Plan,
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-204643) pertaining to the Legacy Dawson Plan, and
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-212577) pertaining to the Dawson Geophysical Company
2016 Stock and Performance Incentive Plan
of our reports dated March 6, 2020, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Dawson Geophysical Company
(which express an unqualified opinion on the financial statements and effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting of Dawson Geophysical Company), incorporated by reference in Annual Report on Form 10-K of Dawson
Geophysical Company for the year ended December 31, 2019.
/s/ RSM US, LLP
Houston, Texas
March 6, 2020
Exhibit 31.1
I, Stephen C. Jumper, certify that:
CERTIFICATIONS
1.
2.
3.
4.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10‑K of Dawson Geophysical Company;
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a‑15(e) and 15d‑15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a‑15(f) and 15d‑15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to
be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial
reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)
(b)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Dated: March 06, 2020
/s/ Stephen C. Jumper
Stephen C. Jumper
Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief
Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 31.2
I, James K. Brata, certify that:
CERTIFICATIONS
1.
2.
3.
4.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10‑K of Dawson Geophysical Company;
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a‑15(e) and 15d‑15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a‑15(f) and 15d‑15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to
be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial
reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)
(b)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Dated: March 06, 2020
/s/ James K. Brata
James K. Brata
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary,
and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES‑OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Exhibit 32.1
In connection with the annual report of Dawson Geophysical Company (the “Company”) on Form 10‑K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Stephen C.
Jumper, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
(1)
(2)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.
Dated: March 06, 2020
/s/ Stephen C. Jumper
Stephen C. Jumper
Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief
Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES‑OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Exhibit 32.2
In connection with the annual report of Dawson Geophysical Company (the “Company”) on Form 10‑K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, James K.
Brata, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
(1)
(2)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.
Dated: March 06, 2020
/s/ James K. Brata
James K. Brata
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary,
and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)