Quarterlytics / Technology / Semiconductors / Dialog Semiconductor / FY2000 Annual Report

Dialog Semiconductor
Annual Report 2000

DLGS · NASDAQ Technology
Claim this profile
Ticker DLGS
Exchange NASDAQ
Sector Technology
Industry Semiconductors
Employees 1001-5000
← All annual reports
FY2000 Annual Report · Dialog Semiconductor
Loading PDF…
Dialog Semiconductor
Annual Report 2000

Intelligence designed to perfection

Dialog

Semiconductor

0
0
0
2

t
r
o
p
e
R

l

a
u
n
n
A

i

r
o
t
c
u
d
n
o
c
m
e
S
g
o
a
D

i

l

 
 
 
 
 
 
Dialog Semiconductor Plc – 
Selected Financial Data

(in thousands of €)

Revenues

EBITDA

EBIT (operating profit)

Net income

Cash flow from operations2)

Shareholders’ equity

Total assets

Redeemable preference shares

Capital expenditure

Research and development

Basic earnings per share3)

Number of shares in thousands (Dec. 31)

Employees (at December 31)

2000

214,459

49,177

38,400

26,557

18,072

199,194

247,423

–

39,024

22,898

0.62

44,069

268

1999

87,246

15,351

11,566

6,680

(907)

68,611

90,864

–

14,487

11,108

0.16

42,069

142

19981)

44,478

7,855

5,311

2,372

7,124

3,036

31,920

17,120

3,273

6,656

0.04

34,568

105

1) 1998 information is presented on a pro forma basis (unaudited) excluding the acquired in-process technology charge of € 9,300
2) In 2000 excluding advance payments to suppliers of € 23,201.
3) Earnings per share information for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, is on a pro forma basis assuming that the weighted average shares

outstanding for the period from March 1, 1998 to December 31, 1998 were also outstanding for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998.

Overview of the Group structure

Overview of the Group structure

Free Float
55.7 %

APAX
28.2 %

Adtran
8.3 %

Ericsson
4.8 %

Management
3.0 %

Dialog Semiconductor 
Plc, UK
100 %

Dialog Semiconductor
GmbH, Germany
Headquarters
Sales, Marketing, Design & Test

Dialog Semiconductor 
UK Ltd.
Sales, Marketing & Design
Northern Europe

Dialog Semiconductor 
Inc. USA
Sales, Marketing & Design
North America

SVEP Design Center AB,
Sweden
Systems and
New Applications

Dialog Semiconductor
KK Japan
Sales, Marketing & Design
Japan

Table of Contents

2 Management Board

3 Letter to our Shareholders

5 Our Shares

11 Management Report 

12 Economic Development in 2000 

Worldwide

Our Market: Wireless Communication

Outlook

Risk factors

17 Operating and Financial Review

Results of Operations

Liquidity and Capital Resources

28 Our Business

Our Strategy

Wireless Communication ASICs

Other Applications

Research and Development

Quality and Environment

Our Employees

Our Facilities

39 Consolidated Financial Statements

Management’s Responsibility for Financial 

Reporting

Independent Auditors’ Report

Consolidated Statements of Income

Consolidated Balance Sheets

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Consolidated Statements of Changes in 

Shareholders’ Equity

Consolidated Fixed Assets Schedule

Notes to the Audited Consolidated Financial 

Statements

63 Board of Directors

Report of the Board of Directors

Members of the Board of Directors

66 Additional Information

Directors’ and Executives’ Compensation

Service Agreements

Legal Proceedings

67 Glossary

68 Index

1

Management Board

Roland Pudelko

Peter Hall

Chief Executive Officer and

Vice-President, IT and Quality (49)

President (48)

joined Dialog Semiconductor in July

joined Dialog Semiconductor in 1989 as

1987. He obtained his BSc (Honours) in

managing director and has served as

electrical and electronic engineering in

Executive Director, CEO and President

1974 from the University of Newcastle

since March 1998. He has 23 years

upon Tyne and his MSc in digital tech-

experience in electronics and micro-

niques in 1977 from the University of

electronics, primarily in management

Edinburgh. Before joining Dialog

positions within the Daimler-Benz Group.

Semiconductor he held various man-

During that time, he was a board mem-

agement and engineering positions at

ber of a joint venture with the Taiwanese

STC Semiconductors and MEM in

company, ACER, and for the TEMIC

Switzerland.

Group he was responsible for the coor-

dination of world-wide design and engi-

neering. Mr. Pudelko has a diploma in

Martin Klöble

communication technologies from the

Vice-President, Finance and

vocational college (Fachhochschule) of

Controlling (41)

Esslingen. He is also the managing

joined Dialog Semiconductor on July 1,

director of Dialog Semiconductor GmbH

1999. He holds an MBA from the Uni-

and our other consolidated subsidiaries.

versity of Stuttgart-Hohenheim and is

qualified as a tax consultant (Steuer-

berater) as well as a certified public

Gary Duncan

accountant in Germany (Wirtschafts-

Vice-President, Operations (45)

prüfer) and in the United States (CPA).

joined Dialog Semiconductor in October

Before joining Dialog Semiconductor he

1987. He obtained a Higher National

worked with KPMG and was appointed

Certificate in electronics and mathemat-

a partner at the beginning of 1999.

ics in 1978 from Plymouth Polytechnic

and is a chartered engineer. Before join-

ing Dialog Semiconductor he held

Richard Schmitz

various senior engineering and manage-

Vice-President, Engineering (44)

ment positions at Plessey and ES2 in

joined Dialog Semiconductor in 1989.

quality and production, device engineer-

He received a diploma in engineering

ing, design software and marketing.

for communications electronics in 1983

from the vocational college (Fachhoch-

schule) in Trier. Prior to joining Dialog

Semiconductor, he held various design-

related positions in Hewlett Packard’s

instruments division in Böblingen and

at the Institute for Microelectronics,

Stuttgart.

Letter to our Shareholders

Dear Shareholders,

Focus on advanced applications.

As the data transmission rates in mobile networks increase,

new applications such as MP3 music playback and video tele-

phony will become more widespread. These applications place

new demands on the audio processing within mobile terminals.

We have already sampled advanced audio designs incorpo-

rating high resolution codecs, targeted at delivering improved

voice quality and hi-fi bandwidth for use in these applications.

2000 was again a year of significant growth. With revenues
increasing by 146 % to € 214.5 million, Dialog Semiconductor

The efficient use of battery power in mobile phones continues

Plc strongly outperformed the overall market growth for mobile

to be a key operating parameter, while advances in basic sili-

handset shipments in 2000 (50 - 60 %) and the worldwide

con techniques are reducing powerconsumption per function,

semiconductor growth in 2000 (30 - 35 %). We were able to

the complexity per function and the number of functions with-

build on our strong position as a market leader of mixed signal

in the phone is increasing. This dictates the need for more

ASICs for the wireless handset industry. EBIT margin rose

advanced, complex and efficient power management which is

significantly to 18 % from 13 % due to the continuing benefits

particularly true for Third Generation systems, where dual

of scale from the Company’s business model. A key success

mode operation with existing standards such as GSM will be

factor is our scaleable fabless operation where we outsource

an initial requirement until significant network coverage is

wafer manufacturing and assembly of our ASICs to worldclass

established. To meet these challenges we have taken the

contract manufacturers. This strategy results in a stable gross

approach of both evolving current proven designs to offer a

margin and differentiates us from the cyclical semiconductor

low risk path to upgrading performance and also proactive

industry. Our gross margin improved slightly over last year

development of new circuits to provide significant advances

from 35.0 % to 35.2 %. Revenues outside of Europe increased

targeting key performance parameters. With this approach we

to 27 % in 2000 from 13 % of total revenues in 1999. Regional

are confident that we will be present in early 3G handsets on

growth was particulary strong in Asia where revenues rose
more than 600 % over last year to € 41 million. Net income
increased by 300 % to € 26.6 million, a record for the Company,
and basic earnings per share of € 0.62 increased 287 % from

the market as a number of these designs are in development

or are already sampled with potential users.

With unparalleled experience in integrating power manage-

1999. The record results for the fiscal year 2000 are also the

ment solutions in cellular applications, Dialog Semiconductor

outcome of our strong cost management and lean overhead
structure. Cash generated from operations was € 18.1 mil-

has worked towards more advanced solutions employing

higher levels of integration and has recently brought together

lion, excluding advance payments for future wafer supplies.

both the power management and audio functions into a single

device. Such developments are very challenging particularly

Our position entering 2001.

in the analog domain, however our wealth of expertise and

In line with the trend in the mobile handset industry of increased

experience has resulted in a number of successful devices

outsourcing of manufacturing, Ericsson announced on Janu-

being developed for 2001 product applications.

ary 6, 2001 its intention to outsource its handset manufactur-

ing operation to Flextronics. We already enjoy strong relation-

Kirchheim/Nabern, March 2001

ships with contract manufacturers such as Solectron, Elcoteq

and Flextronics, and we anticipate a smooth transition towards

a closer collaboration with Flextronics. As a result of develop-

ment activities in 2000, we have been establishing a technology

and design-in base to meet the demands of our customers in

2001. With an eye to the demands of current and future

Roland Pudelko

systems, research and development has been undertaken in

CEO & President

both optimizing existing designs and addressing the require-

ments of the new 2.5 and 3G systems.

Letter to our Shareholders

3

Our Shares

Our Shares 5

5

Considerable volatility on the international stockmarkets.

The stockmarkets at home and abroad were marked in the year 2000 by record growth on

the one hand and substantial share price losses on the other. The German stock index,

the DAX, declined by 7.5 % compared with the end of the previous year. After an eventful

year, the Nemax All Share Index, which covers all the shares traded on the Neuer Markt,

closed down 40 % compared with the end of 1999. The value of the Neuer Markt doubled

in the first quarter of 2000, to reach an historic high of 8559 points on March 10. In the

first price slide, the index fell by the beginning of April to around 6000 points. The market

then maintained this level until the middle of September. The Neuer Markt once again lost

half of its market capitalization in the final quarter of 2000, closing the year at 2743 index

points.

The US stockmarkets also finished the trading year 2000 negatively. The Dow Jones Index

was 6.2 % lower than the previous year, and the Nasdaq Composite Index shed more than

39.3 %. The stock prices of the semiconductor and mobile phone manufacturers, which

have a close correlation with Dialog Semiconductor, were extremely volatile.

The Dialog Semiconductor shares.

The Dialog Semiconductor share price was unable to escape the trends and volatility of

the overall market. After its strong performance in 1999, the year of the IPO, the share

price started exceptionally well in 2000. The share price achieved a high for the year of
€ 75.25 on February 11. Following this sharp upwards trend, which had been maintained

since Dialog Semiconductor’s IPO in 1999, the share price became more volatile during

the remainder of the first quarter, with a comparatively weak to negative performance. The

shares only recovered significantly again in the second quarter, and almost repeated the

first quarter high at the end of April and in mid-June.

A share split was approved at the AGM on May 18, which became effective on May 31,

whereby, 23,954,960 authorized shares with a nominal value of £ 0.20 per share were

split 2 for 1 into 47,909,920 ordinary shares with a nominal value of £ 0.10. This boosted

the share price.

As the year continued, the share price maintained a relatively high level, with comparatively

moderate price fluctuations. The shares lost ground from September onwards reflecting

the price weakness in almost all segments, and particularly in the growth-oriented stock

exchanges in Europe and the USA. However, the shares still largely managed to remain

ahead of the performance of the Nemax All Share Index. Following Dialog Semiconductor’s

announcement on December 15 that the analysts’ earnings forecasts for the year 2001

would have to be reduced, the share price dropped by more than 60 %. The Dialog
Semiconductor shares closed the year 2000 at a price of € 10.20. The shares lost dis-

proportionate value compared with the reduction in the earnings forecasts, and, with

strong growth potential for the year 2002, we believe that the current share price conceals

strong investment potential.

6 Our Shares

Share price movement compared to NEMAX All Share-Index.

Dialog Semiconductor Plc

NEMAX All Share-Index

in %
800

700

80

600

70

500

60

400

50

300

40

200

30

100

20

10

October 1999

0

December 2000

Successful secondary Nasdaq offering completed.

On June 29, 2000, Dialog Semiconductor successfully listed on Nasdaq at € 57.50 per

share. Since then, Dialog Semiconductor shares have been quoted on Nasdaq under the

trading symbol DLGS. Our share capital was increased by the issue of 2,000,000 new
shares, which resulted in net proceeds available to the company of € 105.6 million. We
have spent approximately € 62 million (including € 10.6 million in 2001) to facilitate capacity

expansion and secure technological influence with silicon suppliers in Asia and Europe to
meet our anticipated growth. We also invested € 33.3 million of the net proceeds to pur-
chase test equipment to expand our test capacity. Additionally, we repaid € 4.4 million

which had been drawn on our credit line to finance the acquisition of 90.8 % of the shares

of SVEP Design Center AB, a Swedish systems design company.

The secondary offering significantly increased our shareholder base. Our current free

float is approximately 55 %.

Extensive investor relations activities for institutional and private investors.

Dialog Semiconductor engaged in significant investor relations work throughout the year

ended December 31, 2000. Investor relations are an important component of our infor-

mation policies and corporate strategy, and responsibility has therefore been assigned

directly at board level. Our investor relations program includes providing continuous infor-

mation to existing and potential investors by means of a comprehensive quarterly report

and extended reporting on our homepage at www.dialog-semiconductor.com. In addition,

we meet with institutional investors and analysts at regular conferences and international

roadshows.

Our Shares

7

Investor relations activities in 2000.

Date

Location

Event

February 16

Press conference Frankfurt

Announcement of 1999 results

April 11

May 18

Conference Call

Release of first quarter results

London

Annual General Meeting

June 15 - 28

Europe, USA

“Secondary” Roadshow

June 20

June 28

July 6 - 7

Vienna

Washington

London

Deutsche Bank European Technology Conference

Nasdaq listing

Morgan Stanley European Emerging Growth 
Conference

July 25 - 27

San Francisco

Robertson Stevens Semiconductor Conference

July 26

Conference Call

Release of second quarter results

August 22 - 23

Stockholm

Morgan Stanley 3G Conference

September 11 - 12

Lisbon

Goldman Sachs Wireless Technology Conference

October 5 - 7

Ireland

Goldman Sachs High Technology Conference

October 25

Conference Call

Release of third quarter results

October 25 - 26

Phoenix

Merrill Lynch European Semiconductor Field Trip

November 2 - 3

London, Paris

Morgan Stanley Roadshow

November 7 - 8

London

West LB Roadshow

November 13 - 16

Baltimore

Deutsche Bank Technology Conference

November 27

Frankfurt

DVFA Technology Forum

November 30

Vienna

Deutsche Bank Roadshow

and some further 35 meetings with investors or analysts and press interviews.

The interest of the financial community in Dialog Semiconductor increased further during

the year ended December 31, 2000. The larger number of analysts from well-known

banks, who published research reports on Dialog Semiconductor, underlines this greater

interest.

Research analyst coverage.

Institution

Areté Research

Analyst

Brett Simpson; Jim Fontanelli

BancBoston Robertson Stephens, Inc

Arun Veerappan; Tore Svanberg

Deutsche Bank AG

Goldman, Sachs & Co.

Ben Lynch

Charles Elliott

Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.

Stuart Adrian; Nicolas Gaudois

Société Générale

Value Research

WestLB Panmure

Julius Bär

Crédit Agricole Indosuez Cheuvreux

Marisa Baldo

Michael Anschütz

Dr. Karsten Iltgen

Ingo Queiser

Bernd Laux

8 Our Shares

Market Prices.

The following table shows, for the periods indicated, the highest and lowest closing market

prices of our shares from the Neuer Markt (Xetra), EASDAQ and Nasdaq:

Neuer Markt (DLG)

First Quarter

Second Quarter

Third Quarter

Fourth Quarter

EASDAQ (DLGS)

First Quarter

Second Quarter

Third Quarter

Fourth Quarter

2000

1999

High

Low

High

Low

€ 72.50

€ 65.95

€ 59.00

€ 37.95

€ 74.00

€ 67.50

€ 60.00

€ 36.00

€ 29.75

€ 40.00

€ 36.56

–

–

–

–

–

–

€ 6.86

€ 43.25

€ 9.50

€ 30.50

€ 41.00

€ 36.00

–

–

–

–

–

–

€ 6.50

€ 41.00

€ 9.52

Nasdaq (DLGS)

First Quarter

–

–

Second Quarter

$ 50.25 

$ 49.38 

Third Quarter

$ 54.88 

$ 33.00 

Fourth Quarter

$ 32.88 

$ 6.25 

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Average trading volume per day 

82,916

83,332

Principal Shareholders.

The following table sets out specified information with respect to the beneficial ownership

of (1) any person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 3 % of our out-

standing shares, and (2) all of our directors and executive officers as a group.

Name and Address

Apax Partners

Adtran, Inc

Ericsson Radio Systems AB

All directors and executive officers
as a group (9 persons) (1)

Free float (2)

Total 

Number

12,430,452

3,645,624

2,101,554

1,325,770

24,565,530

44,068,930

Percent

28.2

8.3

4.8

3.0

55.7

100.0

(1) Of the 1,325,770 shares held by the key management and members of our board of directors, Roland Pudelko
holds 320,405 (0.73 %), Richard Schmitz holds 162,105 (0.37 %), Gary Duncan holds 162,105 (0.37 %), Peter
Hall holds 162,105 (0.37 %), Martin Klöble holds 150,000 (0.34 %), Timothy Anderson holds 7,816 (0.02 %),
Michael Risman holds 1,172 (0.00 %), Jan Tufvesson and his wife hold 165,062 (0.37 %) and Michael Glover
and his immediate family hold 195,000 (0.44 %) in aggregate.

(2) Of which 5,333,666 shares (12.1 %) held by The Capital Group Companies Inc as notified on February 2, 2001,

on behalf of discretionary clients.

Disclosure of interests.

The UK Companies Act 1985 requires that if a person becomes directly or indirectly inter-

ested in 3 % or more of any class of our issued shares, including shares held in the form

of ADSs, that carry the right to vote at our general meetings, such person must notify us

of this interest within two business days. After the 3 % threshold is exceeded, such person

must notify us in respect of increases or decreases of 1 % or more.

Our Shares

9

Management Report

Management Report

11

Economic Development in 2000

Worldwide.

The development of the economy in industrialized countries was marked in the year 2000

by a dynamic first half-year in almost all segments and an economic downturn in the sec-

ond half of the year. This downturn, which continued until the end of the year, came about

as a result of increasingly restrictive governmental monetary policies and the negative

influence of the increase in oil prices. In particular, the economic slowdown in the United

States had a considerable influence on the development of the global economy.

In Germany, gross national product (“GNP”) grew, according to the calculations of the

German Federal Statistical Office, at constant prices by 3.1 % in 2000 compared with the

previous year. Consequently, economic growth in Germany was at its highest level since

1991 and twice as high as the average for the preceding 10 years. GNP at current prices

increased by 2.7 % compared with the previous year. This lower figure compared with GNP

at constant prices was mainly due to import prices, which increased considerably faster

than export prices, due to the higher crude oil price and the decline in the exchange rate

of the euro. National income, i. e. the sum of employee remuneration and business and
investment income, went up in the year 2000 by 2.5 % to € 1.50 billion in Germany. The

increase was therefore considerably greater than in 1999. The national income per inhab-
itant therefore increased by 2.4 % or € 18,300.

The Institute for the International Economy in Kiel expects the global economy to be

noticeably weaker in 2001. It is forecasting an increase of 2.5 % in GNP at constant

prices for industrialized countries, compared with 3.8 % in 2000. Consumer price inflation

will be at a similar level, and unemployment will only decline moderately.

Our Market: Wireless Communication.

The year 2000 has seen continued growth in the wireless marketplace, with a 50 %

increase in handset sales over the previous year to 413 million units shipped. The wire-

less marketplace continues to be the most active semiconductor application area, an

equipment market valued at more than $ 100 billion, with a high semiconductor content

spanning a range of technologies.

High penetration rates lead to higher replacement activities.

As the handset market matures, two separate market sectors are developing. Firstly in

established markets, subscriber rates have exceeded 50 % in 2000, with many industrial-

ized nations forecasting to exceed 70 % by 2002. With such high penetration rates, sales

of handsets to new subscribers in these regions is slowing with a shift towards future sales

dominated by replacement models where subscribers are upgrading their telephones.

Generally the upgrade process is to phones with higher functionality and superior perfor-

mance.

12

Management Report

Countries experiencing economic development represent high demand in

wireless communications.

Asia and
Pacific 31 %

W. Europe
35 %

Secondly in countries where previous socio-economic factors have delayed the introduc-

tion of mobile networks, these regions are now at the forefront of new subscriber growth

due to latent demand, political repositioning and the continuing fall in equipment costs.

Growth in the Asian markets, particularly tapping the massive potential subscriber base in

China, has meant that this region has seen the highest growth in subscribers and will

continue to do so. It is predicted that by 2003 China will be the largest single market for

cellphones.

GSM continues to be the dominant standard in wireless communications.

GSM continued as the dominant digital technology worldwide, accounting for 61 % of all

Latin
America 8 %

Middle
East 3 %

Africa 1 %

C. & E.
Europe
3 %

N. America
19 %

digital cellular handsets sold. Handset sales in all major systems grew by more than 50 %,

Cellular shipments by region 2000

with CDMA representing the next highest volume.

Significant advances were made in 2000 for data over cellular services, particularly for SMS

(Short Messaging Service) and also WAP (Wireless Application Protocol). Currently more

than 13 billion SMS messages are sent each month and sales of WAP enabled terminals

have increased during the second half of 2000. These two non-voice applications have

demonstrated that the cellular telephone is not just a voice communicator, but has the

potential to provide a wide range of other services, many derived from the Internet. It is

these services in particular which will encourage subscribers to trade up to higher func-

tionality phones and will be the dominant source of new revenue streams for operators.

Following a high degree of optimism in the first half of the year, partly fuelled by the per-

ceived strength of technological innovation and the market for wireless internet, the sec-

ond half of the year saw a change in focus by many vendors from outright volume to

maximising margins. This refocusing, together with possible delays in the implementation

of GPRS, EDGE and Third Generation (“3G”) systems, has caused handset manufacturers

to re-evaluate their product plans. This has led to them considering the development of

a further generation of existing GSM designs, targeted at reducing manufacturing costs

rather than the introduction of new features.

2000 was the year that lead wireless communications towards 

the next generation.

Launched in late 2000, the first of the new 2.5G mobile phone systems, GPRS offers

significant improvements in data transfer rate in mobile networks (up to 115 Kb/s). This,

coupled with ‘always on’ operation will make accessing mobile internet far easier than with

current WAP solutions and will counter some of the negative market responses to WAP.

Management Report

13

Another major market development in 2000 was the award of third generation operating

licences, particularly in Europe. This was brought about by either competitive tender, with

licences allocated to the highest bidder, or by a ‘beauty contest’ where licencees were cho-

sen based on a set of criteria such as population coverage, quality of service and proposed

services. The revenue commitments or operating conditions imposed upon licencees will

necessitate that 3G systems are rolled out rapidly, starting commercial operation in Japan

in 2001 and following in Europe from 2003 onwards. 3G will offer further increases in

data bandwidth and will ultimately enable new services such as wireless videophones to

be introduced.

3G systems are targeted to offer the market high quality, efficient, and easy-to-use wireless

mobile multimedia services and will do this by supporting symmetrical and asymmetrical

data transmission using circuit-switched and packet-switched services, such as Internet

Protocol (IP) traffic. Real-time video will be possible through the networks supporting high

data rates: (minimum) 144 kbit/s in all radio environments and 2 Mbit/s in low-mobility and

indoor environments.

Beyond 2000 Cahners In-Stat Group predicts that more than 1 billion wireless handsets

will be sold worldwide in 2003. In the U.S. alone, In-Stat estimates that more than 100 mil-

lion handsets will be sold in 2002, up from 55.7 million in 1999. This explosion of growth

will drive worldwide subscriber rates to 17 % of the population in 2004 and in many indus-

trialized nations penetration will exceed 70 % by 2002. In-Stat expects that wireless hand-

sets will be the most pervasive way of accessing the Internet within the next three years.

Outlook.

We believe that the market for semiconductors – especially ASIC applications for the

wireless communications market – will continue to grow in the coming years. We expect a

strong market in lesser-developed regions lacking or with an insufficient cable network

infrastructure. In regions with established mobile communications services, the market

will benefit from technological progress. The demand for replacement equipment will con-

tinue to grow as users replace their existing equipment with more powerful telephones.

New capabilities will go beyond pure speech transmission. 3G systems will support multi-

media and broadband data transmission. These capabilities include wireless Internet

access via the WAP standard, MP3 playback possibilities or the Bluetooth Standard 

(now in the development phase). Since Mixed Signal-ASICs combine both analog and

digital functions, they represent an excellent solution for the support of these new appli-

cations.

As previously announced on December 15, 2000, we anticipate that the first half of 2001

will be affected by the well documented changes in the wireless communication market

and inventory correction by major wireless customers.

Dialog Semiconductor remains cautiously optimistic for the future and will expand its

commitment to research and development. In 2000 research and development expendi-
tures amounted to € 22.9 million, an increase of 106 % from € 11.1 million in 1999. The

14 Management Report

company plans a further increase in research and development expense in 2001 of about

50 % over the 2000 level. Dialog Semiconductor has eight new products in development

which will be incorporated into new advanced mobile handsets by four existing wireless

customers, plus four products – not audio or power management – for new customers

serving the wireless market. These developments reflect the company’s established

strategy of expanding its wireless customer base to reflect the changes in the worldwide

wireless industry.

Risk factors.

Although we expect the wireless communications market to continue to grow during the

near future, the rate of any growth may be influenced by numerous factors. These include,

among others:

• national and regional regulatory environments 

• general economic conditions

• advances in competing telecommunication and information technologies

• manufacturing capacity

• perceived health risks to mobile phone users 

Any significant constraints on the growth of, or downturns in, the wireless communications

market could have a negative effect on our future revenues and profit growth. Important

risk factors are as follows:

• We derive a substantial portion of our revenues from a relatively small number of wire-

less communications manufacturers. Sales to our five largest customers accounted for

89 % of our revenues in 2000, 86 % of our revenues in 1999 and 79 % of our revenues

in 1998.

• The market in which we compete is characterized by continuous development and tech-

nological improvement. As a result, our success depends on our ability to develop new

designs and products on a cost-effective, timely basis. Our future success also depends

on our ability to anticipate and respond to new market trends, to rapidly implement new

designs which satisfy customers’ desires, and to keep abreast of technological changes

within the semiconductor industry generally.

• We outsource our silicon wafer fabrication to four principal foundries and have made

advanced payments to foundries for future wafer deliveries. If we do not purchase the

minimum quantities under the agreements, we could forfeit up to $ 20 million of our

advanced payments.

• The rapid growth of our business has placed, and will continue to place, a significant

strain on our management, operational, engineering and financial resources. We intend

to selectively expand our global capabilities to provide greater levels of service and sup-

port to some of our key customers. Our ability to effectively manage this growth and

expansion will require us to continue to:

– implement and improve our operational, financial and management information

systems

– train, motivate and manage our employees, and 

– continue to develop, maintain and expand our production and supply relationships with

selected silicon wafer fabrication facilities and assembly companies.

Management Report

15

Operating and Financial Review

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2000 
Compared to the Year Ended 
December 31, 1999

Year Ended December 31, 1999 
Compared to Pro Forma 1998 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flows
Liquidity
Capital Expenditures and Investments
Wafer Supply Agreements
Dividends

Operating and Financial Review

17

Results of Operations

Forward-looking statements.

The annual report contains “forward-looking statements”. All statements regarding our future financial condition,
results of operations and businesses, strategy, plans and objectives are forward-looking. Statements containing the
words “believes”, “intends”, “expects” and words of similar meaning are also forward-looking. Such statements involve
unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our results, performance or achievements or condi-
tions in the markets in which we operate to differ from those expressed or implied in such statements. These factors
include, among others, regulatory changes, technological development, globalization, levels of spending in major
economies, the levels of marketing and promotional expenditures, actions of our competitors, employee costs,
future exchange and interest rates, changes in tax rates and future business combinations or dispositions.

The following table sets forth historical and pro forma consolidated statements of income

for the Company in thousands of Euros and as a percentage of revenues for the years

indicated (1998 on a pro forma basis).

2000

Year ended
December 31,
1999 

214,459

(138,866)

75,593

%

100.0

(64.8)

35.2

87,246 

(56,749)

30,497 

%

100.0

(65.0)

35.0

1998 (1)
(unaudited
pro forma)

44,478 

(25,429)

19,049 

%

100.0

(57.2)

42.8

(22,898)

(10.7)

(11,108)

(12.7)

(6,656)

(15.0)

(11,644)

(5.4)

(6,586)

(7.6)

(6,125)

(13.8)

(2,651)

(1.2)

(1,237)

(1.4)

(957)

(2.1)

–   

–  

–  

–   

(9,300)

(20.9)

Revenues

Cost of sales

Gross margin

Research and
development

Selling, general and
administrative 

Amortization of goodwill
and intangible assets

Acquired in-process
research and
development

Operating profit (loss)

38,400

17.9

11,566 

13.3

(3,989)

(9.0)

Financial income
(expense), net

Income taxes

Net income (loss)

4,567

(16,410)

26,557

2.1

(7.6)

12.4

(316)

(4,570)

6,680 

(0.4)

(5.2)

7.7

(218)

(2,721)

(0.5)

(6.1)

(6,928)

(15.6)

(1) The pro forma statement of income data for the year ended December 31, 1998 gives effect to our acquisition
of our predecessor business as if this acquisition had occurred on January 1, 1998. We calculated the pro
forma statement of income data as follows:
• We combined the results of operations of our predecessor business for January and February, 1998 with the

results of our operations for the ten months from March through December, 1998.

• We added €152,000 to amortization of goodwill and intangible assets to show the amount of amortization

expense we would have had if the acquisition had occurred on January 1, 1998.

18 Operating and Financial Review

Year Ended December 31, 2000 
Compared to the
Year Ended December 31, 1999

Revenues.

Revenues were € 214.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2000 compared with
€ 87.2 million for the year ended December 31, 1999. This represents a 146 % increase.

This increase in revenues was primarily due to greater sales volumes resulting from an

industry-wide increase in demand for mobile communications products combined with a

variety of new designs in production in response to customer requirements. The unit growth

in mobile handset volumes results from subscriber growth and accelerating replacement

demand.

Cost of Sales.

Cost of sales consists of the costs of outsourcing production and assembly, personnel

costs and applicable overhead and depreciation of test and other equipment. Cost of sales
increased from € 56.7 million for the year ended December 31, 1999 to € 138.9 million for

the year December 31, 2000 in line with significantly increased production volumes. Cost

of sales as a percentage of revenues decreased slightly during this period from 65.0 %

for the year ended December 31, 1999 to 64.8 % for the year ended December 31, 2000.

Gross Margin.

Gross margin increased from € 30.5 million for the year ended December 31, 1999 to
€ 75.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2000. As a percentage of revenues, gross

margin increased slightly from 35.0 % for the year ended December 31, 1999 to 35.2 %

for the year ended December 31, 2000 due to improved yields in the production process

of new products.

Research and Development.

Research and development expenses increased 106 % from € 11.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 1999 to € 22.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2000. As a percent-

age of revenues, however, research and development expenses decreased from 12.7 %

for the year ended December 31, 1999 to 10.7 % for the year ended December 31, 2000.

The decrease in research and development expenses as a percentage of revenues resulted

from the proportionately greater revenue base. The absolute increase in research and

development expenses reflected the demand from key customers for us to devote further

resources to assist in the development of new products for them and our own strategic

research and development. We increased research and development headcount from 76

at December 31, 1999 to 145 at December 31, 2000.

,

9
5
4
4
1
2

6
4
2
7
8

,

1999

2000

Revenues

,

6
6
8
8
3
1

9
4
7
6
5

,

1999

2000

Cost of sales

3
9
5
5
7

,

7
9
4
0
3

,

1999

2000

Gross margin

8
9
8
2
2

,

8
0
1
1
1

,

1999

2000

Research and
development

All in thousands of €

Operating and Financial Review

19

4
4
6
1
1

,

6
8
5
6

,

1999

2000

Selling, general
and administrative

1
5
6
2

,

7
3
2
1

,

1999

2000

Amortization of
goodwill and
intangible assets

0
0
4
8
3

,

6
6
5
1
1

,

1999

2000

Operating profit

All in thousands of €

Selling, General and Administrative.

Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries, travel expenses

and costs associated with advertising and other marketing efforts, and personnel and sup-

port costs for our finance, human resources, information systems and other management
departments. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 76 % from € 6.6 mil-
lion for the year ended December 31, 1999 to € 11.6 million for the year ended Decem-

ber 31, 2000. The absolute increase in selling, general and administrative expenses reflect-

ed higher costs incurred resulting from additional sales and administrative personnel,

increased IT systems support and legal and accounting expenses as a public company.

We increased sales and administrative headcount from 29 at December 31, 1999 to 40 at

December 31, 2000. As a percentage of revenues, selling, general and administrative

expenses decreased from 7.6 % for the year ended December 31, 1999 to 5.4 % for the

year ended December 31, 2000 primarily due to the proportionately greater revenue base.

Amortization of Goodwill and Intangible Assets.

Amortization of goodwill and intangible assets for the year ended December 31, 1999
was € 1.2 million and for the year ended December 31, 2000 was € 2.7 million. In both

cases, the amortization related primarily to the goodwill and other intangible assets

recorded as part of the acquisition of the Dialogue Semiconductor activities of Daimler-

Benz AG on March 1, 1998, our predecessor business. In addition, in 2000 amortization

includes the rights of a 16 bit microprocessor core and other software as well as amortiza-

tion of goodwill arising from the acquisition of SVEP Design Center AB. Goodwill recog-

nized in connection with the acquisitions is being amortized over the expected period of

benefit ranging from 7 to 15 years.

Operating Profit.

We reported an operating profit of € 11.6 million for the year ended December 31, 1999
and € 38.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2000. This 231 % increase in operat-

ing profit was primarily due to greater sales volumes in 2000, which were partially offset

by higher research and development expenses and to a lesser extent, by higher selling,

general and administrative expenses.

20 Operating and Financial Review

Financial Income, net.

Financial income, net consists primarily of interest income from our investments (primarily

short-term deposits), interest expense on our short-term borrowings, and foreign curren-
cy transaction gains and losses. Financial income, net increased from € 0.3 million of
expenses for the year ended December 31, 1999 to € 4.6 million of income for the year

ended December 31, 2000. This increase is primarily due to recognized foreign exchange

gains from the period-end valuation of foreign currency receivables and payables and

interest income on cash balances following our secondary offering in June 2000.

Income Taxes.

Income tax expense was € 4.6 million for the year ended December 31, 1999 or an effec-

tive tax rate of 37.6 % (before amortization of goodwill and other intangible assets). For
the year ended December 31, 2000, income tax expense amounted to € 16.4 million or an

effective tax rate of 37.1 % (before amortization of goodwill and other intangible assets).

Net Income.

For the reasons described above, we reported net income of € 6.7 million for the year
ended December 31, 1999 compared with net income of € 26.6 million for the year ended

December 31, 2000.

7
6
5
4

,

6
1
3
–

1999

2000

Financial income,
net

0
1
4
6
1

,

0
7
5
4

,

1999

2000

Income taxes

7
5
5
6
2

,

0
8
6
6

,

1999

2000

Net income

All in thousands of €

Operating and Financial Review

21

Year Ended December 31, 1999 
Compared to Pro Forma 1998 

Revenues.

Revenues were € 87.2 million for the year ended December 31, 1999 compared with pro
forma 1998 revenues of € 44.5 million. This represents a 96 % increase. This increase in

revenues in 1999 was primarily due to greater sales volumes resulting from an industry-

wide increase in demand for mobile communications products combined with a variety of

new designs in production in response to customer requirements. The growth in demand

for mobile communications products resulted from an increasing number of first time

users due to more affordable rates and an increasing need for the newer generation of

smaller and more powerful replacement systems. We have benefited because the prod-

ucts of our key customers were in high demand. The gains in volumes were partially off-

set by lower prices demanded from existing customers as they increased the size of their

orders and as designs matured.

Cost of Sales.

Cost of sales increased from € 25.4 million for the pro forma year ended December 31,
1998 to € 56.7 million for the year ended December 31, 1999. Cost of sales as a per-

centage of revenues increased during this period from 57.2 % for the pro forma year

ended December 31, 1998 to 65.0 % for the year ended December 31, 1999. The higher

cost of sales as a percentage of revenues in 1999 resulted from lower per unit sales

prices as order sizes increased and as designs matured.

Gross Margin.

Gross margin increased from € 19.0 million for the pro forma year ended December 31,
1998 to € 30.5 million for the year ended December 31, 1999. As a percentage of rev-

enues, however, gross margin decreased from 42.8 % for the pro forma year ended

December 31, 1998 to 35.0 % for the year ended December 31, 1999. This lower gross

margin as a percentage of revenues was due to the lower unit prices demanded by cus-

tomers as order sizes increased and designs matured and to a lesser extent to higher

cost of sales due to start up costs incurred in connection with the launch of new products.

6
4
2
7
8

,

8
7
4
4
4

,

1998

1999

Revenues

9
4
7
6
5

,

9
2
4
5
2

,

1998

1999

Cost of sales

7
9
4
0
3

,

9
4
0
9
1

,

1998

1999

Gross margin

All in thousands of €

22 Operating and Financial Review

Research and Development.

Research and development expenses increased 66.9 % from € 6.7 million for the pro
forma year ended December 31, 1998 to € 11.1 million for the year ended December 31,

1999. As a percentage of revenues, however, research and development expenses

decreased for this period from 15.0 % for the pro forma year ended December 31, 1998

to 12.7 % for the year ended December 31, 1999. The decrease in research and develop-

ment expenses as a percentage of revenues resulted from proportionately greater rev-

enue base. The absolute increase in research and development expenses reflected the

increased demand from key customers for us to devote further resources to assist in the

development of new products for them. We increased research and development head-

count from 53 at December 31, 1998 to 76 at December 31, 1999.

Selling, General and Administrative.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 7.5 % from € 6.1 million for the pro
forma year ended December 31, 1998 to € 6.6 million for the year ended December 31,

1999. As a percentage of revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses

decreased from 13.8 % for the pro forma year ended December 31, 1998 to 7.6 % for the

year ended December 31, 1999. These decreases are primarily due to lower selling

expenses as we began to hire our own salesforce.

Amortization of Goodwill and Intangible Assets.

We recorded amortization expense of € 1.0 million for the pro forma year ended Decem-
ber 31, 1998 and € 1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 1999. In both cases, the

amortization related primarily to the goodwill and other intangible assets recorded as part

of the acquisition of our predecessor business. Goodwill recognized in connection with

the acquisition is being amortized over 15 years, the expected period of benefit.

Acquired In-process Research and Development.

In connection with the acquisition on March 1, 1998, we allocated € 9.3 million of the pur-

chase price to acquired in-process technology, which we expensed.

8
0
1
1
1

,

6
5
6
6

,

1998

1999

Research and
development

6
8
5
6

,

5
2
1
6

,

1998

1999

Selling, general and
administrative

7
3
2
1

,

7
5
9

1998

1999

Amortization of
goodwill and
intangible assets

0
0
3
9

,

0

1998

1999

Acquired
in-process
research and
development

All in thousands of €

Operating and Financial Review

23

Operating Profit (Loss).

We reported an operating loss of € 4.0 million for the pro forma year ended December 31,
1998 compared with an operating profit of € 11.6 million for the year ended December 31,

1999. The increase in operating profit in 1999 was primarily due to greater sales volumes

in 1999 and to the non-recurring charge relating to acquired in-process technology in

1998. We expect sales volumes to increase in future periods.

Financial Expense, net.

Financial expense, net increased from expenses of € 0.2 million for the pro forma year
ended December 31, 1998 to expenses of € 0.3 million for the year ended December 31,

1999. This increase in financial expense, net in 1999 is primarily due to interest expense

on short-term borrowings and recognized foreign exchange losses from the year-end val-

uation of foreign currency receivables and payables which more than offset an increase

in interest income on cash balances following our initial public offering in October 1999.

Income Taxes.

We recognized income tax expense of € 2.7 million for the pro forma year ended Decem-

ber 31, 1998 or an effective tax rate of 45.4 % (before amortization of goodwill and other

intangible assets and the charge for acquired in-process technology). For the year ended
December 31, 1999, income tax expense amounted to € 4.6 million or an effective tax

rate of 37.6 % (before amortization of goodwill and other intangible assets). This decrease

in the effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 1999 reflects the fact that we

applied the German distributed corporate income tax rate of 30 % to 1999 earnings of our

German subsidiary compared to the undistributed corporate income tax of 45 %, which

applied in 1998. We plan to distribute the earnings of our German subsidiary to the par-

ent Company in future periods.

Net Income (Loss).

For the reasons described above, we reported a net loss of € 6.9 million for the pro forma
year period ended December 31, 1998 compared with net income of € 6.7 million for the

year ended December 31, 1999.

6
6
5
1
1

,

9
8
9
3
–

,

1998

1999

Operating profit (loss)

6
1
3

8
1
2

1998

1999

Financial expense,
net

0
7
5
4

,

1
2
7
2

,

1998

1999

Income taxes

0
8
6
6

,

8
2
9
6
–

,

1998

1999

Net income (loss)

All in thousands of €

24 Operating and Financial Review

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flows.

Cash used for operating activities was € 5.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2000
and € 0.9 million for the year ended December 31, 1999. In the years 1999 and 2000, we

used cash to finance our growing working capital requirements, primarily higher accounts

receivable and inventory levels as our sales volumes increased. Because our revenues

continued to grow by more than 100 % during 2000, our accounts receivable and accounts
payable increased significantly. Excluding advance payments of € 23.2 million due under

the Wafer Supply Agreements described below, cash provided by operating activities was
€ 18.1 million. The Company’s cash from operating activities was sufficient to finance its

working capital requirements in 1998.

Cash used for investing activities was € 80.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2000,
€ 28.8 million for the year ended 1999 and € 31.7 million for the pro forma year ended

December 31, 1998. Cash used for investing activities for the year ended December 31,

2000 consisted mostly of payments under the Wafer Supply Agreements described below
of € 28.2 million, the purchase of test equipment and tooling (masks) of € 33.3 million, the
acquisition of technology and design software of € 4.8 million, the acquisition of the
remaining outstanding interest of SVEP Design Center AB for € 4.4 million and an addi-
tional capital contribution and loan to ESM Limited (ESM) of € 3.3 million. In 1999, we
invested a total of € 12.2 million in cash to acquire a 19.47 % equity interest in, and make
a loan to, ESM. In addition, in 1999 we invested € 14.5 million in property, plant and equip-
ment, primarily new test equipment. In 1998, € 28.0 million in cash was used to pay for

our acquisition of our predecessor business. See “Capital Expenditures and Invest-

ments”. For more information on the loan to ESM, see Note 7 to the Audited Consolidated

Financial Statements.

In July 2000, we received € 105.6 million in net cash proceeds from our secondary offer-
ing. Of this amount, we used approximately € 51.4 million to facilitate capacity expansion

and secure technological influence with silicon suppliers in Asia and Europe to further
accelerate our anticipated growth. We also used approximately € 33.3 million of our net

proceeds to purchase test equipment to expand our test capacity. Additionally, we used
€ 4.4 million to repay a credit line with Baden-Württembergische Bank Aktiengesellschaft.

In October 1999, we received € 59.2 million in net cash proceeds from our initial public
offering in Germany. Of this amount, we used € 19.6 million to redeem all of our then out-
standing cumulative redeemable preference shares. We also used approximately € 12.2 mil-

lion of the net offering proceeds to repay the short-term borrowings under a revolving line

of credit with Deutsche Bank AG that we incurred in connection with our investment in
ESM. We also used approximately € 3.4 million of the net offering proceeds to repay all

outstanding amounts then due under an overdraft facility with Deutsche Bank AG.

)
1
2
7
0
8
1

,

4
2
1
7

,

7
0
9
–

1998

1999

2000

Cash flow from
operating activities
1) excluding advance

payments to suppliers of
€ 23,201

4
5
1
0
8

,

5
6
6
1
3

,

4
6
7
8
2

,

1998

1999

2000

Cash used for
investing activities

2
0
6
5
0
1

,

1
0
2
6
3

,

3
4
4
6
2

,

1998

1999

2000

Cash provided by
financing activities

All in thousands of €

Operating and Financial Review

25

In 1998, we received € 28.0 million in net cash proceeds from a private offering of securi-

ties to Apax Partners, Ericsson, Adtran and certain members of management. These
contributions consisted of the subscription for approximately € 5.3 million of our ordinary
shares, additional paid-in capital of € 5.3 million and the subscription for approximately
€ 17.5 million of cumulative redeemable preference shares. At the time of the acquisition,
we also repaid € 3.8 million of our predecessor’s indebtedness to DaimlerChrysler AG

primarily through an increase in short-term borrowings.

Liquidity.

Our primary sources of liquidity have been cash from operations as well as cash from the

issuance of ordinary shares, cumulative redeemable preference shares (and from short-

term borrowings). As of December 31, 2000 we had no long-term debt.

At December 31, 2000 we had € 29.9 million in cash and cash equivalents, and had a
working capital surplus of € 70.6 million, as compared to € 11.3 million in cash and cash
equivalents, and a working capital surplus of € 26.7 million at December 31, 1999 and
€ 3.0 million in cash and cash equivalents, and a working capital surplus of € 2.9 million

at December 31, 1998.

We have short-term credit facilities with Deutsche Bank AG and Baden-Württembergische
Bank Aktiengesellschaft totaling € 25.6 million that bear interest at a rate of EURIBOR +

0.75 % per annum. At December 31, 2000 we had no amounts outstanding under these

facilities.

We believe the funding available from these and other sources will be sufficient to satisfy

working capital requirements for the foreseeable future.

Capital Expenditures and Investments.

Our capital expenditures were € 39.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2000 com-
pared to € 14.5 million for the year ended December 31, 1999 and € 3.3 million for the

pro forma year ended December 31, 1998. Our capital expenditures in 2000, 1999 and

1998 consisted primarily of purchasing new or replacement test systems, tooling equip-

ment, handling systems and other equipment in the ordinary course of our business. The

significant increases in capital expenditures in 2000 and 1999 primarily reflect the pur-

chase of 15 additional testing machines in 2000 and 5 in 1999. Also in 1999, in order to

secure additional short-term supply of silicon, we purchased a minority stake in ESM,

which was in receivership at the time. Our capital expenditures were financed principally

9
7
8
9
2

,

7
5
2
1
1

,

8
5
9
2

,

1998

1999

2000

Cash and cash
equivalents

9
8
5
0
7

,

3
8
6
6
2

,

3
4
9
2

,

1998

1999

2000

Working capital

4
2
0
9
3

,

7
8
4
4
1

,

3
7
2
3

,

1998

1999

2000

Capital expenditures

with equity and short-term borrowings.

All in thousands of €

26 Operating and Financial Review

The investment in and loan to ESM in 1999 were financed by short-term borrowings under

an additional revolving line of credit with Deutsche Bank AG. We used a portion of the

net proceeds of our initial public offering to repay all outstanding amounts under this

revolving facility.

In future periods, we may also make strategic investments or acquisitions in connection

with our plans to expand our business internationally. On May 9, 2000 our board exer-

cised our option to purchase the remaining 90.8 % interest that we did not already own in

SVEP Design Center AB, a Swedish company focused on system design for advanced

consumer electronic products in the wireless communication area. SVEP’s system design

expertise has been used by a number of blue-chip companies, such as Ericsson, to develop

prototypes for a wide range of wireless telecommunications devices. The purchase price
of the 90.8 % interest in SVEP was 36,320,000 Swedish Krona (approximately € 4.4 mil-

lion). We have not otherwise entered into any binding contract to make any such strategic

acquisition or investment.

Wafer Supply Agreements.

Under the terms of two wafer supply agreements between us and Chartered Semicon-

ductor Manufacturing Pte., Ltd. (“CSM”) and ESM, we maintain deposits of $ 20 million

with CSM and $ 6 million with ESM. These deposits are classified in the balance sheet

line item “Investments and long-term financial assets”. Under the terms of these agree-

ments, the deposits will guarantee access to certain quantities of sub-micron wafers

through fiscal 2003 and several generations of process technologies ranging from current

products at 0.60-micron and 0.35-micron and will extend down to, and beyond 0.18-micron

technologies. In addition, we paid a total of $ 21.5 million as advance payments for future

wafer deliveries. These advance payments are classified in the balance sheet under

“Prepaid expenses”. We made a further payment of $ 10 million to CSM in February

2001. If we do not purchase the minimum quantities under the wafer supply agreements,

these advance payments will be forfeited for the value of the wafer shortfall up to an

amount of $ 20 million. The outstanding balance of the advance payments will be refunded

in proportion to our purchases of wafers from CSM and ESM, and at this time, we expect

to have the entire advance payment refunded.

During 2000 to hedge our foreign currency exposure with respect to the $ 26 million of

deposits with CSM and ESM, we purchased foreign currency forward contracts to effec-

tively change the US dollar deposits into Euros.

Dividends.

Neither we nor our predecessor business paid dividends in the years ended December 31,

2000, 1999 and 1998. We do not currently plan to pay dividends in the foreseeable future.

Operating and Financial Review

27

Our Business

Our Strategy.

We are a supplier of types of silicon chips called mixed signal ASICs, or application spe-

cific integrated circuits, to leading handset manufacturers in the wireless communications

market. We also supply mixed signal ASICs to the automotive and industrial markets. Our

core competence is the design of complex analog and digital (mixed signal) integrated

circuits and the ability to rapidly deliver qualified and tested products directly to the cus-

tomer. We draw on our team of highly skilled engineers and an extensive library of ASIC

design and know-how to respond to the demands of our customers. Utilizing our mixed

signal expertise, we have focused on two areas of the mobile telephone market, power

management and Audio CODEC, where these design skills are critical for success.

We have successfully developed a strategy of outsourcing the manufacture and assembly

of our ASIC products. We have close relationships with leading semiconductor foundries

who maintain state-of-the-art facilities and allow us to deliver high quality products without

investing the substantial amounts of capital required for an in-house foundry. We control

the whole production process and ensure quality through in-house testing of final product

before delivery to the customer.

Following return of the assembled products from its assemblers, we test our products

before delivery to a customer. No product is delivered to a customer unless it has been

tested. This rigorous testing approach allows us to ensure overall quality control of our

manufactured products. The test programs developed by our test engineers are based

upon specifications determined by the individual customers and are developed in parallel

with the design.

Wireless Communication ASICs.

The mobile phone can be divided into five subsystems:

• The radio frequency subsystem is responsible for transmitting and receiving communi-

cation signals.

• The baseband, or digital control subsystem, uses a micro-controller and a digital signal

processor to control the functioning of the phone and interacts with the operator of the

phone through the display and keypad.

• The flash memory provides all software necessary for the operation of the phone and

retains all user specific data.

• The Audio CODEC subsystem 

• The power management subsystem 

We have chosen to concentrate our efforts to date on Audio CODEC and power manage-

ment ASICs and have successfully executed 32 designs in these two combined areas.

28 Our Business

Audio CODECs.

The Audio CODEC subsystem is the critical interface between the real world analog signals

(such as the human voice) and the digital data processing inside the mobile phone. It is

therefore the main contributor to the voice quality of a mobile phone. The Audio CODEC

converts the digital signal received from the baseband subsystem into an analog signal

that is fed to the loudspeaker and also converts the analog signal from the microphone

into a digital code.

Power management.

The power management subsystem is responsible for the supply of power from the battery

to the other subsystems and controls their power consumption. The basic function of the

power management subsystem is to generate and monitor all required voltages and cur-

rents, to charge and monitor the battery and to interface with the SIM card.

Dialog Semiconductor benefits from growth in wireless communications.

The business sector of wireless communications – the major pillar of our Company – was
exceptionally successful during 2000. Revenues increased by 165 % to € 180.3 million.

Revenues from wireless communications applications accounted for 84 % of total rev-

enues. The primary reason for this increase was the growth in demand for mixed signal

ASICs. Dialog Semiconductor benefited from strong sales realized last year by all our

customers. We provided mixed signal ASICs (power management and audio CODEC) to

100 million mobile telephones in 2000.

Other Applications.

Wireline ASICs.

High growth of investments in data and telecommunications infrastructure in 2000 provid-

ed strong sales growth in our wireline business sector. Revenues in this sector reached
€ 9.5 million representing 4 % of total revenues in 2000. The products we supply provide

the interface between the transmission cable or telephone line and digital transmission

equipment such as central office line cards, routers or multiplexers. The demand to “widen

the pipe” to more users resulted in a 222 % growth in revenue as the development of new

ASICs reached production. Dialog products now support T1, T3, HDSL, SDSL and G.shdsl

transmission standards, embracing the latest high-speed transmission technologies.

Our solutions are targeted at improving system efficiency, increasing transmission distance

and lowering the cost of providing high-speed connections throughout networks.

With continually increasing uptake of Internet based communication in both business and

home environments, the demand for higher speed, wider bandwidth networks will continue

to grow driving the demand for the products we manufacture.

,

5
4
3
0
8
1

2
5
0
8
6

,

9
5
3
3
3

,

1998

1999

2000

Revenues from
Wireless
communications

1
0
5
9

,

0
4
5
2

,

3
5
9
2

,

1998

1999

2000

Revenues from
Wireline ASICs

All in thousands of €

Our Business

29

8
4
9
7

,

0
8
9
6

,

9
7
7
1

,

1998

1999

2000

Revenues from
Automotive ASICs

Automotive Asics.

To date, we have concentrated our efforts in the automotive electronics sector in the areas

of safety and dashboard semiconductor products. For TEMIC DaimlerChrysler we produce

signal conditioning ASICs. These ASICs, when combined with micro-mechanical chips,

form the principal components of the sensors used in airbag systems. These sensors then

relay electronic signals to an electronic control unit, which determines deployment of the

airbag. We believe that, due to increased consumer awareness regarding automotive

safety, growth in the use of sensors in cars will continue as airbag and other safety systems

become more sophisticated.

Automotive dashboards are now used to deliver more information and data to drivers for

safety and convenience. We produce a variety of dashboard control ASICs for customers

such as VDO and TRW, that relay information from various on board sensors (such as

fuel level, oil pressure, speed and engine heat) through micro controllers to the dashboard.

Growth trends in this area are predicted to include information systems for road transport

and traffic, emergency calling systems and links to wider forms of communications such

as the Internet, on-board navigation systems and new wireless communications applica-

tions. As a result, we believe there will be increased demand for mixed signal ASICs in

this sector.

Automotive ASICs: constant contribution to revenues.

Revenues from our automotive applications accounted for € 7.9 million or 4 % of total
revenues for 2000. This represented a growth of € 1.0 million for the business sector of

automotive ASICs when compared to 1999.

1
2
2
5
1

,

2
5
8
7

,

7
3
3
5

,

Industrial ASICs: Completion of the product line.

In addition to providing analog and mixed signal design expertise to the wireless commu-

nications and automotive markets, we also have a relatively small but established product

range consisting of dimming, motor control, sensor and power management ASICs for

use in lighting systems.

1998

1999

2000

Revenues from
Industrial ASICs

Revenues in this area reached € 15.2 million or 7 % of total revenues in 2000. While we

intend to maintain our existing product base in the lighting control and data communica-

tions sectors, we have no current plans for expansion.

All in thousands of €

Revenues are allocated to countries based on the location of the customer. In 2000 regional
growth was particulary strong in Asia where revenues rose more than 600 % to € 41 million.

Revenues by Region.

30 Our Business

Research and Development

R&D: backbone of our success.

The market for wireless communications applications is evolving at a rapid pace. Leading

equipment manufacturers bring a new generation of mobile telephones to market about

twice a year. The success of a semiconductor manufacturer is therefore dependent on its

capability to react to the ever-changing demands of its customers with the development

of new designs. For this reason, research and development plays a significant role at

Dialog Semiconductor.

R&D headcount increased in 2000.

In 2000, we added personnel in the research and development department to a total of

145 employees at the end of 2000, up from 76 at the end of 1999. This was due to the

increase in the demand from our customers to devote further resources to assist in the

development of new products.

New developments based on our customers’ needs.

Our research and development expenses arise primarily from design and construction

related costs in connection with the development of new products for existing and new

customers and customer oriented refining of existing products. Dialog Semiconductor’s

research and development is for the most part driven by the particular product needs of

our customers. It is part of our business strategy to develop our products tailored for 

specific customer requirements. Most significant were our product developments for the

new generations of Siemens, Sagem, Motorola and Ericsson phones. These top of

the range products feature Dialog Semiconductor ASICs for power management and for

the Audio CODEC system. In addition we also started developments in other areas of

the mobile phone, not related to power management or CODECs.

We are working toward the future of wireless communications.

Just as it is today, the core of our future R&D will be in the development of new ASIC

designs for the wireless communications market. While the recent trend has focused on

size and power, the coming years will see a growing emphasis placed on new capabilities.

The increasing convergence of information and communications technologies will be at

the forefront of this trend.

Implementation of the new UMTS Standard soon upon us.

Future developments in wireless communications equipment will all belong to the third

generation of wireless communications standards. The UMTS Standard (Universal Mobile

Telecommunications System) will replace the GSM Standard in the long run and will func-

tion worldwide. This Standard will clear the way for future mobile audio, video and Inter-

net applications. The UMTS-Standard is scheduled for introduction in Japan in 2001 and

in Europe and the USA by 2003. During 2000, Dialog Semiconductor has delivered first

prototypes for the third generation of mobile telecommunications systems. Furthermore

5
4
1

6
7

3
5

1998

1999

2000

R&D headcount 2000

All in thousands of €

Our Business

31

we have started developments for more UMTS phones for which we will deliver prototypes

in the first half of 2001. Our process technologies have been refocused towards smaller

geometries to meet the demands of future mobile communications systems. The main

process for new developments is now 0.35 µ which will enable even more integration of

digital and analog capabilities within an ASIC. Also several designs have been started in

0.25 µ and 0.18 µ.

Design process at Dialog Semiconductor: state of the art.

Our engineering group consists of 145 professionals with mixed signal ASIC experience

and has a current development capacity of approximately 30 new designs per year. We

use design tools from Cadence Design Systems, Inc. to increase design automation and

top level simulation to identify system design incompatibilities at an early stage. In addition

we use tools from other suppliers where needed to provide an optimum design environ-

ment for our engineers. Furthermore, we base our production around a standard CMOS

semiconductor technology process in order to focus the design efforts more effectively.

The result has been a continuing decrease in our design to delivery time from an average

of 40 weeks in 1986 to an average of 20 weeks in 2000. Using standard processes also

results in the most cost effective solution for our customers. We have also developed design

methods to withstand higher voltages in these standard processes to continue to meet

the requirements for power management function and benefit from the integration density

for other functions. This is important because of the trend for higher integration combining

power management, therefore requiring higher voltages, and other functions on one piece

of silicon. With recently started developments in other areas of the phone, we will benefit

from our capabilities to combine high voltages and high integration densities.

Our strategic competitive advantage: rapid design cycles.

We believe we offer our clients a significant advantage through our ability to rapidly develop

mixed signal ASIC designs. This ability has been fostered through many years of design

experience and a highly skilled engineering staff. We keep track of evolving design ele-

ments through our design library database. We achieve rapid design cycles through our

strategy of modifying and reusing previously designed building blocks. In 2000, we com-

pleted the acquisition of the rights to the CR16B from, a 16 bit microprocessor core, a

software product requiring National Semiconductor to customize or tailor the software to

meet our requirements. This core, which utilizes the CompactRISCTM architecture devel-

oped by National Semiconductor for embedded applications that are integrated with other

functions on a single integrated circuit, provides a high performance, general purpose,

flexible and power efficient platform that can be used in a wide variety of designs. This

technology enables us to develop system-on-chip, or SOC, designs combining analog,

digital and microcontroller functions. We have successfully integrated circuits combining

complex digital functions including eFlash, which can at the same time handle 40V in a

0.35 µ technology.

32 Our Business

Quality and Environment

Our Quality and Environmental System is designed to ensure continuous improvement to

our products and considers both quality and environmental aspects. The components of

our System model are represented as follows:

Quality Costs

– Failure
– Appraisal
– Prevention

Customer 
Understanding

– Internal
– External

Product Quality

– Meeting specification
– Qualification
– Monitoring

Quality and Environmental Management System

Quality Management
System

Quality Tools

– Statistical Process

– QS 9000
– ISO 9001
– ISO 14001 (planned)

Control (SPC)
– Benchmarking
– FMEA

Continuous 
Improvement

– Planning
– Training
– Problem Solving
– Employee involvement
– Management commitment

Quality Management.

The success of our strategic outsourcing business model is highly dependent on our

uncompromising approach to quality assurance and our commitment to an environment

of continual improvement in every area of our operations.

To assist us in our goals, it has also been our policy to build partnerships with suppliers

that are certified to the QS 9000/ISO 9000 international quality standards. It is our standard

practice when developing customized designs to go through a customer qualification/

approval process for each product developed. We complete this time consuming process

of using QS 9000/ISO 9000 approved suppliers to increase our customers’ confidence in

achieving a successful product qualification. All of our products have to achieve world-class

quality standards and we have been approved by all of our major customers such as

Siemens, Motorola, Ericsson, Sagem, Adtran, Bosch and Temic. Our customers demand

the highest levels of product quality and service. The attainment of QS 9000 certification

in May 2000 (we have been ISO 9001 approved since 1993) further documented our

main quality goals of zero defects and the continuous improvement of both product and

process quality. The implementation of such a recognized international quality standard

further enhances the quality awareness of our employees within a proven, structured

environment and demands the active participation of every individual within our company.

Our Business

33

The success of our quality system is, therefore, assured since our employees know they

contribute to our success by the way they carry out their own responsibilities. The Quality

Management team has a key role in ensuring that the objectives of our Company are clearly

understood at all levels throughout the organisation and that they align with departmental

and individual objectives. A state of the art internal quality web site on our Company

Intranet has also been established in order to enable global knowledge management,

training aids and document controls. Fast and flat communication channels based on the

concept of low status differentials further aid information dissemination.

The Environment and Environmental Protection.

The protection of the environment and a respectful handling of natural resources should

be a priority of any company worldwide. We at Dialog Semiconductor are commited to

face the challenges of environmental protection at all levels because we believe that sus-

tainable development can only be secured if we take care of our valuable resources.

As a direct response to customer and market environmental requirements, in addition to a

comprehensive body of environmental laws, rules and regulations in each jurisdiction in

which we operate, we have begun implementation of an Environmental Management

System compliant with ISO 14001 requirements. Our environmental goals are achieved

by continuously improving environmental performance throughout the entire product and

process life cycle by improving communications with our manufacturing partners and cus-

tomers. Good communication regarding key environmental aspects is aided by our policy

of dealing only with suppliers having similar environmental goals as ourselves.

In addition, our internal emphasis is focused on increasing awareness and knowledge of

environmental issues throughout the organization, until this becomes a natural part of the

decision making process. We are planning to achieve ISO14001 certification during 2001.

34 Our Business

Our Employees

Employees: almost 90 percent more than last year.

For a company such as Dialog Semiconductor, where intellectual property is a driving force,

our employees are the primary strategic success factor. They are the guarantee of the

quality of our products and the innovative capabilities of the entire group. The challenge is

to continually improve our employees’ knowledge and motivation. During 2000, our human

resources work focused on two main areas: the early recruitment and rapid integration of

new employees, and their development within the Company. As of December 31, 2000,

our global workforce consisted of 268 employees, 126 more than at year-end 1999, or an

89 % increase.

In May 2000 the acquisition of Svep Design Center AB, a Swedish system design Company,

brought us 42 employees – the majority of whom are involved in systems engineering and

evaluation. With SVEP we will be able to identify system constraints earlier in the process

and help our customers reduce their overall component cost while improving operating

performance.

Of our global workforce, 145 (54 % of all employees) are engaged in design and engi-

neering. Our team is highly motivated and well qualified. Together they share more than

400 years of combined experience in the design of mixed signal ASICs.

WWW.Careers@Dialog Semiconductor: online service for applicants.

Our Internet site, www.dialog-semiconductor.com, serves not only as an information and

communication platform, but also as a service platform for job applicants. Interested stu-

dents, university graduates and professionals can access information on career entry and

development opportunities, as well as details of vacant positions for which they can apply

directly. At the end of 2000, over 30 % of all applications were made online.

Employment opportunities are being offered at all our locations in Germany, the UK, the

USA, in Sweden, Austria and in Japan. We are primarily interested in acquiring experi-

enced and highly qualified engineers for all levels of our design and operations activities.

8
6
2

16

40

67

145

2
4
1

5
0
1

6

29

31

76

7

25

20

53

1998

1999

2000

Employees by function
1998–2000

Design & Engineering 
Production 
(incl. Logistics & Quality)   
Sales, Marketing & 
Administration
IT

Our Business

35

Performance related compensation at Dialog Semiconductor.

The expertise and motivation of our employees is a decisive factor for the fulfillment of

our customers needs, and therefore guarantees our corporate success. Performance-pro-

moting and performance-rewarding compensation for executives and staff therefore have

great significance at Dialog. Our employees and managers are rewarded through their

compensation for their individual performance, in addition they participate in the compa-

ny’s earnings through a profit sharing scheme.

In addition, we have granted stock options to employees which will vest after they have

met eligibility requirements. The share and stock option plans have been successful in

rewarding and motivating existing employees and are a valuable recruitment tool in

attracting new staff.

Personnel development.

To develop our employees and establish strong communication and feedback, we have

implemented a worldwide employee appraisal program. One goal of this program is to

assist managers in assessing an employee’s career development and potential. In addi-

tion, promoting and documenting employee training – whether via external courses or

inhouse training – is part of our ISO 9000 and QS 9000 quality procedures.

We encourage our employees to extend their horizon beyond a particular function. In order

to promote an international outlook, we attach great importance to letting them gain expe-

rience at one of our other sites as early as possible in their careers.

A word of thanks to our employees.

The Management Board would like to take this opportunity to thank all employees for their

hard work during the past year. We are looking forward to a new year of working together

and gaining new successes.

36 Our Business

Our Facilities

Dialog Semiconductor Plc and its wholly-owned subsidiaries currently use the following

properties:

Location

Approximate area (m(2))

Principal Use

Neue Strasse 95,
Kirchheim/Teck-Nabern, Germany

3,702

Windmill Hill,
Swindon, Wiltshire,
United Kingdom

54 Old Highway 22, Clinton,
New Jersey USA

S:t Lars väg 44a, Ideon Park
Lund, Sweden

Aomi Frontier Building 9f
43, Aomi 2-chome
Koto-ku/Tokyo, Japan

Mannheimer Strasse 1
Heidelberg, Germany

Industriestrasse 1
Munich/Germering, Germany

Kärntner Strasse 518
Graz-Seiersberg, Austria

780

661

1,638

686

307

530

197

Company headquarters,
office operation for
design, marketing and testing

Office operation for
marketing and design

Office operation for
marketing and design

Office operation for
marketing and design

Office operation for
marketing and design

Office operation for design

Office operation for design

Office operation for design

Our Business

37

Consolidated Financial Statements

Consolidated Financial Statements

39

Management’s Responsibility for
Financial Reporting

The accompanying consolidated financial statements and related notes of Dialog

Semiconductor Plc were prepared by management, which has the primary responsibility

for the integrity of the financial information therein. The statements were prepared in

conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”)

and include amounts which are necessarily based on management’s judgment. Financial

information presented elsewhere in this report is consistent with that in the financial

statements.

We have installed effective internal controlling and monitoring systems to ensure compli-

ance with the accounting principles and the adequacy of reporting. They include the use

of uniform guidelines group-wide, the use of reliable software, the selection and training

of qualified personnel.

The financial statements have been audited by the Company’s independent auditor,

whose opinion is expressed on the following page. Their audit was conducted in accor-

dance with generally accepted auditing standards, and as such, they obtained an under-

standing of the Company’s systems of internal accounting controls and conducted such

tests and related procedures as they deemed necessary to arrive at an opinion on the

fairness of presentation of the financial statements.

Together with the independent auditors, the Board of Director’s Financial Audit Commit-

tee examined the consolidated financial statements including the notes and reviewed the

documentation related to the financial statements.

Roland Pudelko

CEO & President

Martin Klöble

Vice President Finance & Controlling

40 Consolidated Financial Statements

Independent Auditors’ Report

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Dialog Semiconductor Plc:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Dialog Semiconductor Plc and subsidiaries

(as defined in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998

and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the

fiscal years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999 and for the period March 1, 1998 to December 31, 1998,

the Successor periods, and for the period January 1, 1998 to February 28, 1998, the Predecessor period.

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our respon-

sibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with United States generally accepted auditing standards. Those

standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the

financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence

supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the

accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall

financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects,

the financial position of Dialog Semiconductor Plc and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998,

and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2000 and

1999 and for the period March 1, 1998 to December 31, 1998, the Successor periods, and for the period

January 1, 1998 to February 28, 1998, the Predecessor period, in conformity with United States generally

accepted accounting principles.

As more fully described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Dialog Semiconductor Plc acquired

the Dialogue semiconductor activities of Daimler-Benz AG (now DaimlerChrysler AG) as of March 1, 1998

in a business combination accounted for as a purchase. As a result of the acquisition, the consolidated

financial statements for the Successor periods are presented on a different basis of accounting than that of

the Predecessor period, and therefore are not directly comparable.

Stuttgart, Germany 

February 23, 2001

KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft

Aktiengesellschaft

Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft

(Sheehan)

CPA

(Kiechle)

Wirtschaftsprüfer

Consolidated Financial Statements

41

Consolidated Statements of Income

(In thousands of €,
except per share data)

Successor

Predecessor

Year ended
December 31,

For the period
March 1, 1998
to December 31,

For the period
January 1, 1998
to February 28,

Revenues

Cost of sales

Gross margin

Research and development

Selling, general and administrative

Amortization of goodwill and
intangible assets

Acquired in-process research and
development

Operating profit (loss)

Financial income (expense), net

Income taxes

Net income (loss)

Earnings per share
Basic earnings (loss) per share

Diluted earnings (loss) per share

16

3

18

Weighted average number of shares
(in thousands)
Basic

Diluted

Notes

2000

214,459

(138,866)

75,593

(22,898)

(11,644)

1999

87,246

(56,749)

30,497

(11,108)

(6,586)

1998

38,197

(21,896)

16,301

(5,542)

(5,077)

(2,651)

(1,237)

(802)

–

38,400

4,567

(16,410)

26,557

0.62

0.60

42,669

44,300

–

11,566

(316)

(4,570)

6,680

0.16

0.15

35,980

37,790

(9,300)

(4,420)

(140)

(2,430)

(6,990)

(0.23)

(0.23)

34,568

34,568

1998

6,281

(3,533)

2,748

(1,114)

(1,048)

(3)

–

583

(78)

(291)

214

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements

42 Consolidated Financial Statements

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands of €)

ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents

Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
of 1,045, 298, and 155 in 2000, 1999 and 1998

Inventories

Deferred taxes

Other current assets

Prepaid expenses

Current assets

Property, plant and equipment, net

Intangible assets

Deferred taxes

Investments and long-term financial assets

Prepaid expenses

TOTAL ASSETS

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Financial liabilities

Accounts payable

Income taxes payable

Deferred taxes

Other current liabilities

Current liabilities

Deferred taxes

Cumulative redeemable preference shares

TOTAL LIABILITIES

Ordinary shares

Additional paid-in capital

Retained earnings (deficit)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

Employee stock purchase plan shares

Shareholders’ equity

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

At December 31,

Notes

2000

1999

1998

29,879

11,257

42,100

36,818

182

3,162

4,151

116,292

46,772

19,723

445

44,505

19,686

21,946

10,019

38

5,101

–

48,361

15,570

13,500

522

12,911

–

2,958

7,548

3,496

44

661

–

14,707

3,842

12,966

405

–

–

247,423

90,864

31,920

–

26,815

12,173

1,106

5,609

45,703

2,526

–

48,229

6,737

168,776

24,242

(440)

(121)

199,194

247,423

56

15,289

3,195

604

2,534

21,678

575

–

22,253

6,418

63,475

(2,315)

1,194

(161)

68,611

90,864

3,489

4,766

1,400

–

2,109

11,764

–

17,120

28,884

5,267

5,267

(7,969)

471

–

3,036

31,920

5

3

7

6

6

3

6

7

8

3

9

3

10

12

11

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements

Consolidated Financial Statements

43

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands of €)

Successor

Predecessor

Year ended
December 31,

For the period
March 1, 1998
to December 31,

For the period
January 1, 1998
to February 28,

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net
cash provided by (used for) operating activities:

Depreciation of property, plant and equipment

Amortization of goodwill and intangible assets

Acquired in-process research and development

Change in deferred taxes

Changes in current assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable

Inventories

Prepaid expenses

Accounts payable

Other assets and liabilities

Cash provided by (used for)
operating activities

2000

1999

1998

26,557

6,680

(6,990)

8,126

2,651

–

2,322

(19,626)

(26,793)

(23,862)

11,409

14,087

2,548

1,237

–

1,135

(14,065)

(6,523)

–

10,445

(2,364)

1,368

802

9,300

543

(2,637)

(791)

–

351

1,835

1998

214

219

3

–

(44)

3,048

(428)

–

525

(194)

(5,129)

(907)

3,781

3,343

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property, plant and equipment, net

Purchases of intangible assets

Investments and deposits made

Payments for the acquisition of businesses

(39,024)

(4,769)

(32,019)

(4,342)

(14,487)

(1,372)

(12,905)

–

Cash used for investing activities

(80,154)

(28,764)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Changes in financial liabilities

Additions to short-term borrowings

Repayment of short-term borrowings

Proceeds (repayments) of redeemable
preference shares including accrued dividends

(58)

–

–

–

Proceeds from issuance of ordinary shares

105,627

Purchase of employee stock purchase
plan shares

Sale of employee stock purchase plan shares

–

33

(3,434)

12,190

(12,190)

(19,563)

59,152

(185)

231

(2,861)

(313)

–

(28,047)

(31,221)

386

3,489

(3,809)

17,465

10,534

–

–

(412)

(32)

–

–

(444)

(1,622)

–

–

–

–

–

–

Cash provided by (used for)
financing activities

Cash provided by operating, investing
and financing activities

Effect of foreign exchange rate
changes on cash and cash equivalents

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

Cash and cash equivalents
at end of year

105,602

36,201

28,065

(1,622)

20,319

(1,697)

18,622

11,257

6,530

1,769

8,299

2,958

29,879

11,257

625

(50)

575

2,383

2,958

1,277

1

1,278

1,105

2,383

44 Consolidated Financial Statements

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements

Consolidated Statements of Changes
in Shareholders’ Equity

(In thousands of €)

Predecessor

Ordinary
shares

Additional
paid-in
capital

Retained
earnings

Accumulated other
comprehensive
income (loss) –
currency translation
adjustment

Balance at December 31, 1997

1,454

1,420

Net income

Other comprehensive loss

Total comprehensive income (loss)

–

–

–

–

–

–

788

214

–

214

Balance at February 28, 1998

1,454

1,420

1,002

746

–

(4)

(4)

742

(In thousands of €)

Successor

Ordinary
shares

Additional
paid-in
capital

Retained
earnings
(deficit)

Accumulated other Employee

comprehensive
income (loss) –
currency translation
adjustment

stock
purchase
plan
shares

New issuance of shares

5,267

5,267

Net loss

Other comprehensive income

Total comprehensive income (loss)

Accrued dividend – cumulative
redeemable preference shares

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

(6,990)

–

(6,990)

(979)

Balance at December 31, 1998

5,267

5,267

(7,969)

New issuance of shares

1,151

58,001

Net income

Other comprehensive income

Total comprehensive income

Purchase of employee stock 
purchase plan shares

Sale of employee stock purchase 
plan shares

Accrued dividend – cumulative
redeemable preference shares

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

6,680

–

6,680

–

–

–

–

–

–

207

–

(1,026)

–

–

471

471

–

471

–

–

723

723

–

–

–

Total

4,408

214

(4)

210

4,618

Total

10,534

(6,990)

471

(6,519)

(979)

3,036

59,152

6,680

723

7,403

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

(185)

(185)

24

231

–

(1,026)

Balance at December 31, 1999

6,418

63,475

(2,315)

1,194

(161)

68,611

New issuance of shares

319

105,308

Net income

Other comprehensive loss

Total comprehensive income (loss)

Sale of employee stock purchase 
plan shares

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

(7)

–

26,557

–

26,557

–

Balance at December 31, 2000

6,737

168,776

24,242

–

–

(1,634)

(1,634)

–

(440)

–

–

–

–

105,627

26,557

(1,634)

24,923

40

33

(121)

199,194

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements

Consolidated Financial Statements

45

Consolidated Fixed Assets Schedule

Property, plant and equipment

Test equipment

Leasehold improvements

Office and other equipment

Intangible assets

Goodwill 

Other intangible assets

Investments and long
term financial assets

Loans and deposits

Other investments

Balance at
January 1,

2000

14,511

1,178

6,133

21,822

11,121

5,234

16,355

10,507

2,404

12,911

Acquisition costs

Currency  Acquisition
change

of business Additions Disposals

Balance at
December 31,

33,298

404

–

–

5,326

(278)

2000

47,808

1,588

11,725

39,028

(278)

61,121

–

4,769

4,769

–

31,387

(430)

(430)

664

32,051

–

–

–

(32)

–

(32)

15,221

10,013

25,234

41,867

2,638

44,505

–

–

608

608

4,100

–

4,100

(1)

6

(64)

(59)

–

10

10

5

–

5

Investments in affiliated companies

Name

Registered office

Participation

Dialog Semiconductor GmbH

Kirchheim/Teck - Nabern, Germany

Dialog Semiconductor Ltd

Swindon, UK

Dialog Semiconductor Inc

Clinton, New Jersey, USA

Dialog Semiconductor KK

SVEP Design Center AB

Tokyo, Japan

Lund, Sweden

100 %

100 %

100 %

100 %

100 %

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements

46 Consolidated Financial Statements

Consolidated Fixed Assets Schedule
(Continued)

Depreciation/Amortization

Balance at
January 1,

Currency 
change

Acquisition 
of business

Additions

Disposals

Balance at
December 31,

Book Value

Balance at
December 31,

2000

3,041

381

2,830

6,252

1,359

1,496

2,855

–

–

–

(1)

(2)

(37)

(40)

–

5

5

–

–

–

2000

2000

1999

–

–

285

285

–

–

–

–

–

–

5,374

211

2,541

8,126

1,132

1,519

2,651

–

–

–

–

–

(274)

(274)

–

–

–

–

–

–

8,414

590

5,345

14,349

2,491

3,020

5,511

–

–

–

39,394

998

6,380

46,772

12,730

6,993

19,723

41,867

2,638

44,505

11,470

797

3,303

15,570

9,762

3,738

13,500

10,507

2,404

12,911

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements

Consolidated Financial Statements

47

Notes to the Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements

(In thousands of €, unless otherwise stated)

1. Basis of Presentation and Acquisitions.

Dialog Semiconductor Plc (“Dialog” or the “Company”) is a supplier of types of silicon chips called mixed

signal application specific integrated circuits (“ASICs”) to leading handset manufacturers in the wireless

communications market. The Company designs and develops analog and digital semiconductor chips

specifically to suit the needs of its customers. Once developed the Company contracts with manufacturers

for production of the chips.

The Company was formed in March 1998 to effect the acquisition of the Dialogue Semiconductor Limited

Group from Daimler-Benz AG (now DaimlerChrysler AG). Dialog was majority-owned by the venture capital

company, Apax Partners (“Apax”), and its related investors prior to the Company’s initial public offering in

October 1999. In connection with its formation, the Company’s shareholders contributed cash in exchange
for ordinary shares with a par value of € 5,267, additional paid-in capital of € 5,267 and cumulative redeemable
preference shares of € 17,465. Thereafter, the Company acquired the Dialogue semiconductor activities
from Daimler-Benz AG for € 28,047 in cash.

The Company has accounted for the acquisition using the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, the

costs of the acquisition were allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their respec-

tive fair values. Amounts allocated to acquired in-process technology have been expensed at the time of

acquisition. The excess of the cost of the acquisition over the fair value of the net assets acquired of approxi-
mately € 11,121 is being amortized over 15 years. The results of operations and cash flows of Dialogue

have been consolidated with those of the Company from the date of the acquisition.

To determine the fair market value of the acquired in-process technology, the Company considered the

income approach, whereupon fair market value is a function of the future revenues expected to be generat-

ed by an asset, net of all allocable expenses and charges for the use of contributory assets. The future net

revenue stream is discounted to present value based upon the specific level of risk associated with achiev-

ing the forecasted asset earnings. The income approach focuses on the income producing capability of the

acquired assets and best represents the present value of the future economic benefits expected to be

derived from these assets.

The Company determined that the acquired in-process technologies had not reached technological feasibili-

ty based on the status of design and development activities that required further refinement and testing. The

development activities required to complete the acquired in-process technologies included completion of

ASICs design, testing and validation, quality assurance, and customer prototype testing.

The acquired in-process technologies represent unique product related developments, the application of

which is technically and legally limited to the unique company-customer relationship. Accordingly, these

acquired technologies have no alternative future use other than the use for which the technologies were

designed.

48 Consolidated Financial Statements

The following summary presents information concerning the purchase price allocation for the acquisition

accounted for under the purchase method in March 1998.

Dialogue Semiconductors

Net
assets

5,051

In-process
research and
development

Other
intangible
assets

Purchase
price

Goodwill

9,300

11,121

2,575

28,047

In the accompanying consolidated financial statements the terms “Dialog” or the “Company” when used in situa-

tions pertaining to periods prior to March 1, 1998 refer to the consolidated group of Dialogue Semiconductors

activities of Daimler-Benz AG acquired by Dialog Semiconductor Plc and when used in situations pertaining

to periods subsequent to March 1, 1998 refer to Dialog Semiconductor Plc and its consolidated subsidiaries.

The consolidated financial information of the business acquired from Daimler-Benz AG is referred to herein

as “Predecessor”, while the consolidated financial information of the Company subsequent to the date of

acquisition is referred to herein as “Successor”. Because of the purchase price allocation, the accompany-

ing financial statements of the Successor are not directly comparable to those of the Predecessor.

Prior to the acquisition in March 1998, the Predecessor was a majority-owned group of companies of Daimler-

Benz AG. All costs incurred by Daimler-Benz AG on behalf of the Predecessor have been specifically charged

back to the Predecessor and are reflected in the consolidated financial statements.

On May 9, 2000 the Company purchased the remaining 90.8 % interest that it did not already own in SVEP

Design Center AB, a Swedish company focused on system design for advanced consumer electronic products

in the wireless communication area. The purchase price of the 90.8 % interest in SVEP was 36,320,000
Swedish Krona (approximately € 4.4 million).

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States

generally accepted accounting principles (“US GAAP”).

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.

Principles of Consolidation – The consolidated financial statements include all of the entities of the

Company. Investments in which the Company has less than a 20 % ownership are accounted for using the

cost method. All intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.

Cash and Cash Equivalents – Cash and cash equivalents include highly liquid investments with original

maturity dates of three months or less. Prior to the acquisition, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents

were invested through the central cash management function of Daimler-Benz AG.

Consolidated Financial Statements

49

Inventories – Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost, which includes direct materials,

labor and overhead plus indirect overhead, is determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) or weighted aver-

age cost methods.

Other Current Assets – Other current assets at December 31, 2000 and 1999 principally represent tax

refunds receivable.

Property, Plant and Equipment – Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated

depreciation. Depreciation is charged on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets

as follows:

Machinery and equipment

3 to 5 years

Leasehold improvements

Shorter of useful life or lease term

Leasing – The Company is a lessee of design software and property, plant and equipment which are

accounted for as operating leases.

Intangible Assets – Purchased software and licenses are stated at cost and amortized using the straight-

line method over the estimated useful lives of three years for software and five years for licenses. Intangible

assets resulting from the acquisition include customer lists, patents, trade names and an assembled work-

force and are amortized over their useful lives of 9 years for customer lists, 17 years for a patent application,

15 years for trade names and 18 years for the assembled workforce. Such useful lives were determined

based upon historical data with respect to customer and employer turnover and remaining contractual lives.

Goodwill – The excess of purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired (goodwill) is amortized

on a straight-line basis over the expected period of benefit ranging from 7 to 15 years. The Company assesses

the recoverability of such amount by determining whether the amortization of the balance over its remaining

life can be recovered from the undiscounted future operating cash flows of the acquired operation. The

amount of impairment, if any, is measured based on projected discounted future operating cash flows using

a discount rate reflecting the Company’s average cost of funds. The assessment of the recoverability of the

excess of cost over net assets acquired will be impacted if estimated future operating cash flows are not

achieved.

Accounting for Long-Lived Assets – The Company assesses impairment of long-lived assets and cer-

tain identifiable intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying

amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a

comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future net cash flows expected to be generated by the

asset. If such assets are considered impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount

by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of

are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. No impairment losses have

been recognized in the years presented.

50 Consolidated Financial Statements

Foreign Currencies – The functional currency for the Company’s operations is generally the applicable

local currency. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities of companies whose functional currency is other than

the Euro are included in the consolidation by translating the assets and liabilities into the reporting currency

(the Euro) at the exchange rates applicable at the end of the reporting year. Equity accounts are measured

at historical rates. The statements of income and cash flows of such non-Euro functional currency opera-

tions are translated at the average exchange rates during the year. Translation gains or losses are accumu-

lated as a separate component of shareholders’ equity. Currency transaction gains or losses arising from

transactions of Dialog companies in currencies other than the functional currency are included in financial
income, net at each reporting period. Net currency transaction gains amounted to € 2,627 for the year
ended December 31, 2000. Net currency transaction losses amounted to € 329, € 53 and € 10 for the year

ended December 31, 1999, for the period from March 1, 1998 to December 31, 1998 and the period from

January 1, 1998 to February 28, 1998, respectively.

The exchange rates of the more important currencies against the Euro used in preparation of the consoli-

dated financial statements were as follows:

Currency

Great Britain 1 GBP

United States 1 USD

Sweden 10 SEK

Exchange rate at
December 31,

Annual average
exchange rate

2000
€

1.60

1.07

1.13

1999
€

1.61

1.00

–

1998
€

1.43

0.85

–

2000
€

1.65

1.08

1.18

1999
€

1.52

0.94

–

1998
€

1.49

0.90

–

Revenue Recognition – Revenue, net of discounts, is recognized when persuasive evidence of an

arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the price of the transaction is

fixed and determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. Service revenue, which is derived from

research and development reimbursement projects, is recognized based upon the acceptance by a cus-

tomer of project milestones.

Product-Related Expenses – Expenditures for advertising and sales promotion and for other sales-relat-

ed expenses are charged to expense as incurred. Provisions for estimated costs related to product warranty
are made at the time the related sale is recorded. Shipping and handling costs amounting to € 684, € 636,
€ 298 and € 36 are recorded within selling expenses for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, for

the period from March 1, 1998 to December 31, 1998 and the period from January 1, 1998 to February 28,

1998, respectively.

Research and Development – Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Research

and development costs which are charged to customers and, accordingly, are included in cost of sales,
amounted to approximately € 2,286, € 1,492, € 1,926, and € 310 for the years ended December 31, 2000

and 1999, for the period from March 1, 1998 to December 31, 1998 and the period from January 1, 1998 to

February 28, 1998, respectively.

Income Taxes – Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets

and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the finan-

cial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax

assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years

Consolidated Financial Statements

51

in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax

assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enact-

ment date. The Company records deferred tax valuation allowances, if any, to reduce the deferred tax

assets to amounts which will more likely than not be realized.

Stock-Based Compensation – The Company applies the intrinsic value-based method of accounting

prescribed by Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,”

and related interpretations, for its stock option plan. As such, compensation expense would be recorded on

the date of grant only if the current market price of the underlying shares exceeded the exercise price.

Earnings Per Share – Earnings per share has been computed using the weighted average number of out-

standing ordinary shares during the Successor period. Because the Company reported a net loss for the

period March 1, 1998 to December 31, 1998, only basic per share amounts have been presented. Had the

Company reported net income for the period March 1, 1998 to December 31, 1998, the weighted average

number of shares outstanding would have potentially been diluted by 1,077,710 stock options (not assuming

the effects of applying the treasury stock method).

Earnings per share information for the Predecessor periods has not been presented because the predecessor

was a limited liability company and part of a majority-owned group of UK companies of Daimler-Benz AG.

Accordingly, earnings per share information is not meaningful.

Concentration of Credit Risk – The Company’s revenue base is diversified by geographic region and by

individual customer. The Company’s products are generally utilized in the mobile communications and auto-

motive industries. During 2000, 1999 and 1998, two customers individually accounted for more than 10 % of

the Company’s revenues. Such customers accounted for 75 % in 2000, 69 % in 1999, 56 % for the period

March 1, 1998 to December 31, 1998 and 59 % for the period January 1, 1998 to February 28, 1998 of total

revenues. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and, gen-

erally, requires no collateral from its customers.

Use of Estimates – The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and

assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent amounts

at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the report-

ing period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

New Accounting Pronouncements – In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)

issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments

and Hedging Activities.” This standard requires companies to record derivatives on the balance sheet as

assets and liabilities, measured at fair value, regardless of the purpose or intent for holding them. Gains and

losses resulting from changes in the values of those derivatives would be accounted for in income or share-

holders’ equity (as a component of other comprehensive income), depending on the use of the derivative

and whether it qualifies for hedge accounting. With the issuance of SFAS 137, “Accounting for Derivative

Instruments and Hedging Activities – Deferral of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 133, an Amend-

ment of FASB Statement No. 133,” this standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2000.

In June 2000, the FASB issued SFAS 138, “Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain

Hedging Activities, an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133,” which, among other things, permits foreign

52 Consolidated Financial Statements

currency denominated assets and liabilities to qualify for hedge accounting. The Company adopted SFAS

133 and the amendments contained in SFAS 138 effective January 1, 2001. Application of the new stan-

dards did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In December 1999, the US Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”)

101, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements,” which summarizes the Commission’s views in applying

generally accepted accounting principles to the recognition, presentation and disclosure of revenue in finan-

cial statements. Dialog adopted the provisions of SAB 101 in the fourth quarter of 2000. Adoption of SAB

101 did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

3. Income Taxes.

Income (loss) before income taxes consists of the following:

Germany

Foreign

Successor

Predecessor

Year ended
December 31,

For the period
March 1, 1998
to December 31,

For the period
January 1, 1998
to February 28,

2000

23,965

19,002

42,967

1999

8,570

2,680

11,250

1998

2,953

(7,513)

(4,560)

1998

664

(159)

505

The provision for income taxes consists of the following:

Current taxes:

Germany

Foreign

Deferred taxes:

Germany

Foreign

Successor

Predecessor

Year ended
December 31,

For the period
March 1, 1998
to December 31,

For the period
January 1, 1998
to February 28,

2000

1999

1998

1998

8,444

5,644

2,430

(108)

16,410

2,286

1,149

1,044

91

4,570

1,641

246

–

543

2,430

323

12

9

(53)

291

Although Dialog is a UK company, its principal operations are located in Germany and all of its operating

subsidiaries are owned by its German subsidiary. Accordingly, the following information is based on German

corporate tax law. German corporate tax law applies a split-rate imputation with regard to the taxation of the

income of a corporation and its shareholders. In accordance with the tax law, retained corporate income is

initially subject to a federal corporate tax of 40 % in 2000 and 1999, and 45 % in 1998 plus a solidarity sur-

charge of 5.5 % in 2000, 1999 and 1998 on federal corporate taxes payable. Including the impact of the

surcharge, the federal corporate tax rate amounts to 42.2 % in 2000 and 1999 and 47.475 % in 1998. Upon

distribution of retained earnings to shareholders, the corporate income tax rate on the earnings is adjusted

to 30 %, plus a solidarity surcharge of 5.5 % in 2000, 1999 and 1998 on the distribution corporate tax, for a

total of 31.65 % in 2000, 1999 and 1998, by means of a refund for taxes previously paid.

Consolidated Financial Statements

53

In 2000 and 1999, the Company applied a distributed corporate income tax rate of 30 % to earnings of its

German subsidiary for 2000 and 1999 compared to the undistributed corporate income tax rate 45 % for 1998

as the Company plans to distribute such earnings to the parent Company.

In October 2000, the German government enacted new tax legislation which, among other things, will reduce

the Company’s statutory tax rate for its German subsidiary from 40 % on retained earnings and 30 % on dis-

tributed earnings to a uniform 25 %, effective January 1, 2001. The change in German tax law did not have

a material effect on the valuation of the Company’s German source deferred tax assets and liabilities.

A reconciliation of income taxes determined using the German corporate tax rate of 31.65 % for 2000 and 1999

and 47.475 % for 1998, plus the after federal tax benefit rate for trade taxes of 10.426 % for 2000 and 1999

and 7.525 % for 1998, for a combined statutory rate of 42.076 % for 2000 and 1999 and 55 % for 1998, is as

follows:

Successor

Predecessor

Year ended
December 31,

For the period
March 1, 1998
to December 31,

For the period
January 1, 1998
to February 28,

2000

1999

1998

1998

Expected provision (benefit) for
income taxes

Credit for dividend distribution

Foreign tax rate differential

Amortization of non-deductible
goodwill, intangible assets and in-process 
research and development

Others

18,081

(273)

(2,310)

549

363

4,733

(177)

(343)

295

62

Actual provision for income taxes

16,410

4,570

(2,508)

–

(616)

5,530

24

2,430

278

–

28

–

(15)

291

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are summarized as follows:

Property, plant and equipment

Net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards

Other

Deferred tax assets

Property, plant and equipment

Accounts receivable

Prepaid expenses

Accounts payable

Deferred tax liabilities

Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)

December 31,

2000

1999

1998

101

526

–

627

(2,525)

(208)

(417)

(482)

(3,632)

(3,005)

145

415

–

560

(575)

(427)

–

(177)

(1,179)

(619)

236

191

22

449

–

–

–

–

–

449

The deferred tax assets at December 31, 2000 reflect management’s estimate of the amount that will be

realized as a result of future profitability. The amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable could

be reduced if estimates of future taxable income are reduced.

54 Consolidated Financial Statements

4. Additional Cash Flow Information.

The following represents supplemental information with respect to cash flows:

Successor

Predecessor

Year ended
December 31,

For the period
March 1, 1998
to December 31,

For the period
January 1, 1998
to February 28,

Interest paid

Income taxes paid

2000

143

5,214

1999

280

1,860

1998

212

812

5. Inventories.

Inventories are comprised of the following:

Raw materials

Work-in-process

Finished goods

December 31,

2000

11,827

14,009

10,982

1999

2,527

6,896

596

36,818

10,019

1998

40

14

1998

711

913

1,872

3,496

6. Property, Plant and Equipment, net, Intangible Assets, Investments and Long-term

Financial Assets.

Information with respect to changes to the Company’s property, plant and equipment, net, intangible assets,

investments and long-term financial assets is presented in the consolidated Fixed Asset Schedule included

herein.

Depreciation expense amounted to € 8,126, € 2,548, € 1,368 and € 219 for the years ended December 31,

2000 and 1999, for the period from March 1, 1998 to December 31, 1998 and the period from January 1,

1998 to February 28, 1998, respectively.

Consolidated Financial Statements

55

7. Other Assets and Prepaid Expenses

At December 31, 2000, the Company maintained deposits of $ 20 million with Chartered Semiconductor

Manufacturing Pte., Ltd., (CSM) and $ 6 million with ESM. These deposits are classified in the balance

sheet line item “Investments and long-term financial assets.” Under the terms of these agreements, the

deposits will guarantee access to certain quantities of sub-micron wafers through fiscal 2003 and several

generations of process technologies ranging from current products at 0.60-micron and 0.35-micron and will

extend down to, and beyond 0.18-micron technologies. In addition, the Company paid a total of $ 21.5 million

as an advance payment for future wafer deliveries. Such advance payment is classified in the balance sheet

line items “Prepaid expenses.” A further payment of $ 10 million was made to CSM in February 2001. If

the Company does not purchase the minimum quantities under the agreement, these advance payments

will be forfeited for the value of the wafer shortfall up to an amount of $ 20 million. The outstanding balance

of the advance payment is refunded in proportion to the Company’s purchases of wafers from CSM and 

ESM, and at this time, the Company expects to have the entire advance payment refunded. During 2000 to

hedge the foreign currency exposure with respect to the $ 26 million of deposits with CSM and ESM, the

Company purchased foreign currency forward contracts to effectively change the US dollar deposits into

Euros (see Note 15).

In addition, other assets includes a cost basis investment (€ 2,638) in and a loan (€ 12,874) to ESM Hold-

ings Limited, the parent company of ESM, a silicon wafer foundry in Newport, Wales and a supplier of the
Company, totaling € 15,512. The loan bears interest at 5 % per annum and is due in 2003 or immediately in

the event of an initial public offering by ESM or change in control. At December 31, 2000, the carrying value

of the ESM loan approximated market value.

8. Financial Liabilities

At December 31, 2000, the Company had unused short-term credit lines of € 25,805.

9. Other Current Liabilities.

Other current liabilities are comprised of the following:

Accrued personnel and social costs

Accrued warranty

Outstanding invoices

Sales commissions

Other tax liabilities

Other

December 31,

1999

1998

993

812

254

32

384

59

911

299

377

104

–

418

2,534

2,109

2000

2,560

375

1,025

200

1,190

259

5,609

56 Consolidated Financial Statements

10. Cumulative Redeemable Preference Shares.

In connection with its formation in March 1998, Dialog issued 5,640,194 shares of cumulative redeemable

preference shares with a par value of £ 1 per share, at a premium of £ 1 per share. The preference shares,

if not previously redeemed, were redeemable at their issue price in six equal semi-annual installments

beginning on January 1, 2001. Cumulative preference net cash dividends were payable to the preference

shareholders at a rate of 8 % per annum. In the event of a listing on certain specified exchanges or sale of

the Company, the unredeemed preference shares, together with all accumulated unpaid dividends, became

due and payable.

Preference shareholders had no voting rights unless (i) the Company was in default of any amounts payable

with respect to the redemption installments or dividends, (ii) general meetings of the Company included a

resolution for winding up the affairs of the Company, for effecting a reduction of share capital or to effect any

changes attached to the preference shares, or (iii) there had been a shortfall of 50 % or more of operating

profits against the annual budget and not the result of any specific actions not already approved by the Board.

In October 1999, Dialog repaid the carrying amount, including cumulative unpaid dividends, of 5,640,194

shares of cumulative redeemable preference shares with a par value of £ 1 per share, issued at a premium
of £ 1 per share. The carrying amount of redeemable preference shares had been increased by € 2,005
through a charge to retained earnings in 1999 and 1998 resulting in a total repayment of € 19,563.

On May 18, 2000, the Company’s shareholders approved a resolution reclassifying the 5,640,194 issued

and redeemed preference shares of £ 1 per share as 56,401,940 ordinary shares of £ 0.10 per share rank-

ing pari passu with the existing ordinary shares of the Company.

11. Shareholders’ Equity.

At December 31, 2000, Dialog had authorized 104,311,860 ordinary shares with a par value of £ 0.10 per

share. Issued and outstanding were 44,068,930 ordinary shares.

On August 18, 1999, Dialog was re-registered as a public limited company under the laws of England and

Wales and changed its name to Dialog Semiconductor Plc. Prior to that date, Dialog was incorporated as a

private limited liability company, registered in England and Wales.

On September 24, 1999, Dialog approved a five-for-one split of the Company’s ordinary shares and effected

changes in its capital structure. In connection with the changes in capital structure, the authorized number of

ordinary shares of the Company was increased by 9,500,000 shares. The Company also amended its Arti-

cles to allow for only one class of ordinary shares and one class of preference shares. All previously out-

standing “A” and “B” ordinary shares have been converted into an equal number of the Company’s ordinary

shares with a par value of £ 0.10 per share (after adjustment for the five-for-one split). Each ordinary share

entitles the holder to one vote. All share and per share amounts presented for periods after March 1, 1998

have been retroactively adjusted to give effect to the share split and the changes in capital structure.

On October 13, 1999, the Company completed an initial public offering of ordinary shares, receiving net
proceeds (after deduction of underwriting discounts, stamp duty and other offering expenses) of € 59,152

from the sale of 7,500,000 new shares.

Consolidated Financial Statements

57

On May 18, 2000, the shareholders of the Company approved the following resolutions related to the capital

structure of Dialog that (i) subdivided the 23,954,960 authorized ordinary shares with a par value of £ 0.20

per share by means of a two-for-one share split into 47,909,920 ordinary shares with a par value of £ 0.10

per share, and (ii) reclassified the 5,640,194 issued and redeemed cumulative redeemable preference

shares with a par value of £ 1 per share as 56,401,940 ordinary shares with a par value of £0.10 ranking

pari passu with the existing ordinary shares of the Company. All share and per share amounts presented for

periods ending after March 1, 1998 have been retroactively adjusted to give effect to the share split.

On June 29, 2000, the Company completed an offering of ordinary shares in Germany and the United

States resulting in net proceeds (after deduction of underwriting discounts, stamp duty and other offering
expenses) of € 105,627 from the sale of 2,000,000 new shares at € 57.50 per share.

12. Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

On March 26, 1998, the Company and its then majority owner, Apax, adopted the Subscription and Share-

holders Agreement under which employees and directors are invited from time-to-time, at the discretion of

the Board, to purchase up to 3,456,890 ordinary shares of the Company from Apax or an established

Employee Benefit Trust. The purchase price of the shares is equal to their estimated fair value on the date

the employee or director subscribes for those shares. Employees and directors are immediately vested in

their purchased shares. During the first quarter of 1999, the Trust acquired 668,800 ordinary shares from

Apax for purposes of distributing them to employees under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. For the

period from March 1, 1998 to December 31, 1998 and for the year ended December 31, 1999, employees

and directors purchased 2,581,360 and 473,480 ordinary shares, respectively, at fair value on the date of

purchase. During 2000 the Trust distributed 57,108 shares in connection with the exercise of employee

stock options. At December 31, 2000, the Trust continued to hold 375,622 shares.

13. Stock Option Plan.

On August 7, 1998, the Company adopted a stock option plan (“Plan”) under which employees and directors

may be granted from time-to-time, at the discretion of the Board, stock options to acquire up to 3,840,990

shares of the Company’s authorized but unissued ordinary shares. Stock options are granted with an exer-

cise price not less than the estimated fair value at the date of grant. Stock options have terms of ten years

and vest over periods of one to five years from the date of grant. The fair value of the stock option grants

was estimated using the Minimum Value Method prior to the Company’s IPO in October 1999. The fair value

of all subsequent grants is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The following weighted-

average assumptions were used for stock options grants for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999

and for the period from March 1, 1998 to December 31, 1998:

Expected dividend yield

Expected volatility

Risk free interest rate

Expected lives (in years)

2000

0 %

70 %

4.8 %

5

Weighted-average fair value of options granted

£ 12.35

Year ended
December 31,

For the period
March 1, 1998 to
December 31,

1999

0 %

–

4.0 %

5

£ 0.10

1998

0 %

–

4.0 %

5

£ 0.04

58 Consolidated Financial Statements

Stock option plan activity for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999 and for the period from March 1,

1998 to December 31, 1998 was as follows:

(prices in £)

Options

Outstanding at beginning of year

1,840,500

Granted

Exercised

Forfeited

1,192,520

(57,108)

(126,134)

Outstanding at end of year

2,849,778

Options exercisable at year end

331,834

2000

1999

1998

Weighted
average
exercise
price

0.37

20.57

0.34

0.30

8.83

0.38

Weighted
average
exercise
price

Weighted
average
exercise
price

Options

0.20

0.59

–

0.20

0.37

–

–

–

1,077,710

0.20

–

–

–

–

1,077,710

0.20

–

–

Options

1,077,710

773,140

–

(10,350)

1,840,500

–

The Company applies APB Opinion 25 in accounting for the Plan and, accordingly, no compensation cost

has been recognized for its stock options in the consolidated financial statements. Had the Company deter-

mined compensation cost based on the fair value at the grant date for its stock options under SFAS 123,

“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” the Company’s net income (loss) would have been the pro

forma amounts indicated below for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999 and for the period from
March 1, 1998 to December 31, 1998 (in thousands of €, except per share data):

Net income (loss):

As reported

Pro forma

Net income (loss) per share-basic:

As reported

Pro forma

Year ended
December 31,

For the period
March 1, 1998 to
December 31,

2000

26,557

25,809

0.62

0.59

1999

6,680

6,666

0.16

0.16

1998

(6,990)

(6,991)

(0.23)

(0.23)

The following table summaries information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2000:

Range of Exercise Prices

€ 0.32 - 1.28 (£ 0.20 - 0.80)

€ 55

€ 26

€ 0.32 - 55

Options Outstanding

Number
Outstanding at
December 31,

Weighted-Avg.
Remaining
Contractual Life

2000

1,657,258

287,760

904,760

2,849,778

8.1

8.9

9.7

8.7

As of December 31, 2000, stock options amounting to 331,834 with a weighted average contractual life of

8.2 years were exercisable at prices ranging between £ 0.20 and £ 0.80.

Consolidated Financial Statements

59

14. Lease Commitments.

The Company leases design software, certain of its office facilities, office and test equipment, and vehicles

under operating leases. Total rentals under operating leases, charged as an expense in the statement of
income, amounted to € 4,873, € 2,528, € 1,020 and € 167 for the for the years ended December 31, 2000

and 1999, for the period from March 1, 1998 to December 31, 1998, and the period from January 1, 1998 to

February 28, 1998, respectively.

Future minimum lease payments under rental and lease agreements which have initial or remaining terms in

excess of one year at December 31, 2000 are as follows:

Operating leases

2001

7,131

2002

6,884

2003

2,385

2004

634

2005

Thereafter

472

467

15. Information about Financial Instruments.

a) Use of financial instruments

As a matter of policy Dialog does not engage in derivatives trading, derivatives market-making or other

speculative activities.

Changes in exchange rates influence the Company’s results of operations because sales are primarily

denominated in US dollars and Euros whereas purchases of raw materials and manufacturing services are

primarily denominated in US dollars. In order to hedge foreign currency exposure, the Company attempts to

match cash inflows and outflows (sales with supply costs) in the same currency, primarily the US dollar.

During 2000 to hedge the foreign currency exposure with respect to the $ 26 million of deposits with CSM

and ESM, the Company purchased foreign currency forward contracts to effectively change the US dollar

deposits into Euros.

b) Fair value of financial instruments

The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, other current assets and current

liabilities approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these financial instruments.

At December 31, 2000 the notional amounts, carrying amounts and fair values of the forward contracts and

deposits were as follows:

Currency contracts

Deposits

Notional amounts Carrying amounts Fair values

28,190

–

–

28,190

1,194

26,996

The fair values of the forward foreign contracts were based on reference exchange rates adjusted for the

respective interest rate differentials.

60 Consolidated Financial Statements

c) Accounting for and reporting of derivative instruments and hedging activities

The forward foreign contracts purchased to offset the Company’s exposure to identifiable transactions with

currency risks are accounted for together with the underlying business transactions (“hedge accounting”).

Gains and losses on forward exchange contracts are deferred off-balance sheet and are recognized as a

component of the related transactions. Discounts on forward contracts are recognized as expense when

incurred.

At December 31, 2000 the Company had unrealized gains on these currency contracts of € 1,194.

16. Segment Reporting.

The Company operates in one segment, the design and development of semiconductor chips.

Revenues by product-type consisted of the following:

Successor

Predecessor

Year ended
December 31,

For the period
March 1, 1998
to December 31,

For the period
January 1, 1998
to February 28,

2000

1999

1998

180,345

9,501

7,948

15,221

1,444

68,052

2,953

6,980

7,852

1,409

214,459

87,246

28,648

2,240

1,528

4,584

1,197

38,197

1998

4,711

300

251

753

266

6,281

Revenues:

Wireless communication

Wireline communication

Automotive

Industrial

Other

Revenues are allocated to countries based on the location of the customer; long-term assets are allocated

according to the location of the respective units.

Successor

Predecessor

Year ended
December 31,

For the period
March 1, 1998
to December 31,

For the period
January 1, 1998
to February 28,

2000

1999

1998

1998

40,941

57,866

21,480

35,726

35,582

5,490

14,805

2,569

21,024

29,679

5,737

19,136

5,145

496

5,076

953

11,550

9,835

3,836

5,837

–

2,100

4,730

309

2,116

1,498

524

929

–

515

699

–

214,459

87,246

38,197

6,281

Revenues:

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Other European countries

Malaysia

Other Asian countries

USA

Other countries

Consolidated Financial Statements

61

Long-term assets

Germany

United Kingdom

USA

Sweden

December 31,

2000

1999

1998

116,386

12,801

1,390

554

36,079

5,457

967

–

11,473

5,161

579

–

131,131

42,503

17,213

17. Related Party Transactions.

Adtran Inc. (“Adtran”) and Ericsson Radio System AB (“Ericsson”) each hold a substantial ownership interest

in the Company. The Company sells components to Adtran and Ericsson in the ordinary course of business.

The selling price for these transactions are negotiated on an arm’s length basis. Revenues amounted to
€ 134,110, € 48,502, € 18,131 and € 2,740 for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, for the pe-

riod from March 1, 1998 to December 31, 1998, and the period from January 1, 1998 to February 28, 1998,
respectively. Net receivables due from Adtran and Ericsson were € 28,196, € 12,645 and € 4,424 at

December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.

In August 1999, the Company acquired a cost basis investment in ESM Holdings Limited, the parent compa-

ny of ESM, a silicon wafer foundry in Newport, Wales and a supplier of the Company. In August 2000, the
Company participated pro rata in an additional capital contribution and loan to ESM totaling € 3.3 million. Includ-
ed in cost of sales in 2000 and 1999 are purchases of silicon wafers from ESM in the amount of € 50,428 and
€ 25,764, payables due to ESM were € 4,991 and € 1,961 at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

18. Earnings Per Share.

Earnings per share is determined as follows (in thousands of Euro, except number of shares and earnings

per share):

Year ended
December 31,

For the period
March 1, 1998 to
December 31,

Net income (loss)

Less preference share dividend

Net income (loss) applicable to ordinary
shareholders

Weighted average number of shares outstanding
(in thousands)-basic

Dilutive effect of stock options (1)

2000

26,557

–

26,557

42,669

1,631

1999

6,680

(1,026)

5,654

35,980

1,810

Weighted average number of shares outstanding
(in thousands)-diluted

Earnings (loss) per share-basic

Earnings (loss) per share-diluted

44,300

37,790

0.62

0.60

0.16

0.15

1998

(6,990)

(979)

(7,969)

34,568

–

34,568

(0.23)

(0.23)

(1) Options issued in 2000 were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options’ underlying exercise

price was greater than the average market price for Dialog ordinary shares for the year ended December 31, 2000.

62 Consolidated Financial Statements

Board of Directors
Report of the Board of Directors

The Board oversaw the functioning of executive management

The audited accounts of the Company, for the year ended 31st

of the Company and at the quarterly Board meetings of 10th Fe-

December 1999, and the reports from the directors and audi-

bruary 2000, 7th April 2000, 20th July 2000 and 19th October 2000

tors thereon were presented to the shareholders at the second

assured itself of the proper conduct of executive management

annual general meeting of the Company, held on 18th May 2000,

during the year 2000. At such Board meetings, the Board

at which KPMG, the Company’s independent auditor, was

received and analysed reports from the chief executive as to

reappointed to hold office until the following annual general

the achievements of the Company against financial budgets

meeting of the Company.

and the progress made in achieving the commercial aims for

the year.

Notwithstanding the considerable effort of executive manage-

ment of the Company to secure the Company’s secondary

Guidance was also given by the Board to the chief executive

public offering and listing on the Nasdaq, the Company in

both in relation to business concerns and business opportuni-

2000 was able to continue to develop and consolidate its

ties. Action items were authorized which were reported on and

market position as one of the world’s leading suppliers of

reviewed as to achievement at the following Board meeting.

mixed signal ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits)

to leading handset manufacturers in the wireless communica-

In addition to the quarterly Board meetings, additional Board

tions market. For this achievement, the Board extends its

meetings were convened in connection with the Company’s

thanks to the executive management and the Company’s

second public offering and listing on the Nasdaq stock ex-

employees.

change. The Board, in accordance with the Company’s Articles

of Association, on various occasions appointed Committees

London, March 2001

of the Board to decide upon various technical matters related

to both the secondary public offering and the listing on the

Nasdaq.

The Remuneration Committee, comprised of Jan Tufvesson,

Jan Tufvesson

Michael Glover and Tim Anderson, having first convened on

Chairman

8th February 2000, subsequently met on 20th March, 18th Octo-

ber, 13th November and 14th December 2000 to discuss the

achievements of management during that year and to estab-

lish the individual objectives of the management team for 2001.

It was also agreed, at the meeting held on 18th October, that

900,000 options of the Company be offered to the Company’s

employees.

The Audit Committee, comprised of Jan Tufvesson and Michael

Glover, having convened for the first time on 8th February 2000,

met on 18th October and 13th November 2000. Discussions at

these meetings were held on a broad range of issues, includ-

ing the Company’s financial management and its compliance

with the financial reporting requirements of the Neuer Markt,

Easdaq and Nasdaq.

Board of Directors

63

Members of the Board of Directors

Jan Olof Ingemar Tufvesson, Chairman (62)

joined the board of our then-holding company in 1990 and has served as chairman of the

board since March 1998. Between 1972 and 1980 he held a number of senior positions

on the Royal Swedish Air Force Board. In 1980 he joined Ericsson where he held a number

of senior positions, the last being a vice president at LM Ericsson corporate, responsible

for all procurement in Ericsson and for developing relations with key suppliers. Mr. Tufvesson

graduated from the Royal University of Technology in Stockholm with a masters degree

in electronic engineering in 1962. Mr. Tufvesson retired from Ericsson in 1998 and is now

active as an independent top management consultant, based in Stockholm. He is also a

director of Arc International Plc.

Roland Pudelko, Chief Executive Officer and President (48)

joined Dialog Semiconductor in 1989 as managing director and has served as Executive

Director, CEO and President since March 1998. He has 23 years experience in electronics

and microelectronics, primarily in management positions within the Daimler-Benz Group.

During that time, he was a board member of a joint venture with the Taiwanese company,

ACER, and for the TEMIC Group he was responsible for the coordination of world-wide

design and engineering. Mr. Pudelko has a diploma in communication technologies from

the vocational college (Fachhochschule) of Esslingen. He is also the managing director of

Dialog Semiconductor GmbH and our other consolidated subsidiaries.

Timothy Richard Black Anderson (40)

joined the board of our then-holding company in 1990 and has served as a director since

February 1998. Mr. Anderson has been a partner with the London law firm Reynolds

Porter Chamberlain since 1989, where he specializes in business law for media and tech-

nology companies. He holds a law degree from Southampton University and is qualified as

a solicitor in England and Wales. He is also a member of the board of directors of eight

other companies.

Michael John Glover (62)

joined the board of our then-holding company in 1990 and has served as one of our direc-

tors since March 1998. Mr. Glover was involved in the establishment and financing of our

UK operations. Prior to becoming involved in private equity fund management in 1985 he

was a senior executive with electronic companies in the United Kingdom, Europe, the Far

East and North America. He has a degree in economics from the University of Birmingham.

Mr. Glover currently is Managing Director of Aylestone Strategic Management Limited and

serves as a director for other companies including Biocode Inc. and Mercury Grosvenor

Trust plc.

64 Board of Directors

John McMonigall (57)

has served as one of our directors since March 1998. He joined Apax Partners as a

director in 1990 and is currently the director responsible for investments in telecommuni-

cations, software and related fields. Between 1986 and 1990, Mr. McMonigall held a vari-

ety of senior positions at British Telecom, including managing director of the customer

service division. He was also a member of the management board of British Telecom. He

is currently on the board of eight other public and private portfolio companies, including

HighwayOne, Neurodynamics, AutoNomy, Jazztel, TelDaFax AG and Crane Telecom.

Michael Risman (32)

joined us as a director in August 1999, having been closely involved with our company

since March 1998. He is a director at Apax Partners where he is responsible for invest-

ments in information technology including semiconductors, software and e-commerce

infrastructure. Before joining Apax Partners in 1995, Mr. Risman worked for The MAC

Group as a strategy consultant and for Jaguar Cars as an engineer. He earned an MBA

from Harvard Business School and an MA (Honors) in Electrical Engineering and Manage-

ment from Cambridge University. He is also a director of Streamserve Inc., ARC Interna-

tional Plc and Integrated Silicon Systems Ltd.

Mark C. Smith (60)

joined us as a director in March 1998. Mr. Smith currently serves as the Chairman of the

Board and Chief Executive Officer of Adtran, which he helped co-found in 1985. He was

also co-founder, and served as Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive

Officer of Universal Data Systems (a modem and data communications equipment man-

ufacturer later purchased by Motorola, Inc.) from 1970 to 1979 and remained as its Presi-

dent until co-founding Adtran.

Tord Martin Wingren (40)

joined us as a director in March 1998. Mr. Wingren has been working with Ericsson for

more than 15 years where he currently serves as Vice President and General Manager of

Product Platform Development and Technologies.

The Articles currently provide that one-third (or a number nearest to one-third) of the

Directors shall retire at every annual general meeting; but if any director has at the start

of the annual general meeting been in office for more than three years since his last

appointment or re-appointment, he shall retire. A Director who retires at an annual general

meeting may, if willing to act, be re-appointed.

Board of Directors

65

Additional Information

Directors’ and Executives’ Compensation

We compensate non-employee directors who are not associated with any of our principal

shareholders £ 5,000 to £ 15,000 per annum. None of the members of non-employee

directors was our employee at any time during 2000. Timothy Anderson, a member of the

Board, is also a partner in the law firm Reynolds Porter Chamberlain, which frequently

acts as our legal adviser. Payments to Reynolds Porter Chamberlain for legal services
rendered during the 2000 fiscal year amounted to approximately € 353,191. We reimburse

all of our directors for their reasonable travel expenses incurred in connection with attend-

ing meetings of the board of directors or committees thereof. Under certain circumstances,

directors are also eligible to receive stock options. The following table sets out the aggre-

gate amount of remuneration paid by us and our subsidiaries to all our directors and senior

executives as a group for services rendered during the year ended December 31, 2000.

Directors and Senior Executives (in €)

Base salary

Bonuses

Monetary value of other benefits

Amounts reserved for pension or similar benefits

793,325

734,016

78,284

0

Service Agreements

Our CEO and President, Roland Pudelko, has entered into a service agreement with us

that is of unlimited duration. The agreement is terminable by either party on 12 months

notice. In addition, our shareholders are entitled to dismiss Mr. Pudelko by virtue of an

ordinary resolution at any time, without prejudice to his right to remuneration. Such dis-

missal is considered termination of the contract at the next possible deadline.

Each of our vice-presidents has entered into a service agreement with us and our sub-

sidiaries. The service agreements are all of unlimited duration. In the case of Gary Duncan

and Peter Hall, their agreements are terminable by either party to the agreement on

6 months’ written notice to the other. Richard Schmitz’s agreement is terminable by either

party on 3 months’ notice to the end of a calendar quarter. Martin Klöble’s agreement is

terminable subject to German statutory provisions for termination. None of the service

agreements contain provisions subjecting us to onerous obligations in the case of early

termination.

Legal Proceedings

Neither we nor any of our consolidated subsidiaries are involved in litigation or arbitration

proceedings that could have a substantial impact on our financial position or the financial

position of any of our consolidated subsidiaries. We have not been involved in such litiga-

tion or arbitration proceedings in the past two years, nor, to the best of our knowledge,

are such proceedings pending or threatened against us or any of our consolidated sub-

sidiaries.

66 Additional Information

Glossary

Analog
A type of signal in an electronic
circuit that takes on a continuous
range of values rather than only
a few discrete values.

Analog circuits
Circuits that process analog
signals.

ASIC
Application Specific Integrated
Circuit; an integrated chip which
is individually custom designed
for a specific application rather
than a general-purpose standard
chip such as a microprocessor
or memory chip.

Audio CODEC
The critical interface between
outside world analog signals
(such as the human voice) and
the digital data processing inside
a mobile phone. It acts as the
main contributor to the voice
quality of a mobile phone. It con-
verts the digital signal received
from the baseband subsystem
into an analog signal that is fed
to the loudspeaker and also con-
verts the analog signal from the
microphone into a digital signal.

Audio CODEC ASICs
ASICs designed to perform
the Audio CODEC (see cover
page 2) function.

Back-end assembly
The second phase of chip
manufacturing during which the
die is assembled into packaging
designed not only to protect it,
but also to provide external
connections via a series of very
fine wires.

Baseband
The frequency band occupied
by the aggregate of all the voice
and data signals  used to modu-
late a radio carrier.

Baseband processing
subsystem
The manner in which a micro-
controller and a DSP control a
baseband processor and inter-
act with the operator of a mobile
phone through the phone’s
display and keypad.

Bluetooth
A radio technology designed to
standardize the transmission of
signals over short distances
between telephone, computers 

and other devices without the
use of wires.

Broadband
Refers to a communications
network in which frequency
range is divided into multiple
independent channels for simul-
taneous transmission of signals
such as voice, data or video.

Chips
Electronic integrated circuits
which are typically made of
silicon.

CDMA
The term CDMA (code-division
multiple access) refers to any of
several protocols used in so-
called second-generation (2G)
and third-generation (3G) wire-
less communications. As the
term implies, CDMA is a form of
multiplexing, which allows
numerous signals to occupy a
single transmission channel,
optimizing the use of available
bandwidth. The technology is
used in ultra-high-frequency
(UHF) cellular telephone
systems in the 800-MHz and
1.9-GHz bands.

CMOS 
Complimentary Metal Oxide
Semiconductor, the most popu-
lar class of semiconductor
manufacturing technology.

CODEC
A coding/decoding device that
converts, or encodes, analog
signals into a form for transmis-
sion on a digital circuit. The digi-
tal signal is then decoded back
to analog signals at the receiv-
ing end of the transmission link.
CODECs allow voice and video
transmission over digital links
and may also support signal
compression.

CompactRISCTM
architecture
A processor architecture
developed by National
Semiconductor which works
with less but faster executable
commands than the processors
used in PCs (Reduced Instruc-
tion Set Computers). This archi-
tecture prevails in the area of
repetitive processing of huge
amounts of data.

Digital
A type of signal used to transmit
information that has only dis-
crete levels of some parameter
(usually voltage).

IC
Integrated Circuit; an electronic
device which contains numer-
ous components on a single
chip.

EDGE
EDGE (Enhanced Data GSM
Environment), a faster version
of the Global System for Mobile
(GSM) wireless service, is
designed to deliver data at rates
up to 384 Kbps and enable the
delivery of multimedia and other
broadband applications to mobile
phone and computer users. The
EDGE standard is built on the
existing GSM standard, using
the same time-division multiple
access (TDMS) frame structure
and existing cell arrangements.
EDGE is expected to be com-
mercially available in 2001. It is
regarded as an evolutionary
standard on the way to Univer-
sal Mobile Telecommunications
Service (UMTS).

Embedded applications
Applications which have been
integrated with other functions
on a single integrated circuit.

Foundry
A manufacturing plant where
wafers are produced.

GSM
Global System for Mobile Com-
munications; GSM has become
the world’s most widely used
mobile system, operating on the
900 MHz and 1800 MHz fre-
quencies in Europe, Asia and
Australia, and the 1900 MHz
frequency in North America and
Latin America.

GPRS
General Packet Radio Services
is a packet-based wireless com-
munication service whith data
rates from 56 up to 114 Kbps
and continuous connection to
the Internet for mobile phone
and computer users. The higher
data rates will allow users to
take part in video conferences
and interact with multimedia
Web sites and similar applica-
tions using mobile handheld
devices as well as notebooks.
GPRS is based on Global Sys-
tem for Mobile (GSM) communi-
cation and will complement
existing services such circuit-
switched cellular phone connec-
tions and the Short Message
Service (SMS).

ISDN
Integrated Services Digital
Network.

Microcontroller 
A microprocessor on a single
integrated circuit intended to
operate as an embedded sys-
tem.

Mixed signal
Describes a combination of
analog and digital signals being
generated, controlled or modi-
fied on the same chip.

MP 3
MP3 (MPEG-1 Audio Layer-3) is
a standard technology and for-
mat for compression a sound
sequence into a very small file
(about one-twelfth the size of
the original file) while preserving
the original level of sound quality
when it is played.

Power management
subsystem
See cover page 2.

Semiconductor 
A base material halfway between
a conductor and an insulator,
which can be physically altered
by mixing in certain atoms.
Semiconductors form the basis
for present-day electronics.

Silicon
A semi-metallic element used to
create a wafer. It is the most
common semi-conductor materi-
al, used in about 95% of all
manufactured chips.

UMTS
Universal Mobile Telecommuni-
cations System; the name for
the “third generation” mobile
telephone standard in Europe,
standardized by ETSI (Euro-
pean Telecommunications Stan-
dardization Institute).

Wafer
A slice of silicon sliced from a 4,
5, 6 or 8 inch diameter silicon
bar which is used as the foun-
dation on which to build semi-
conductor products.

Glossary

67

Index

(letter C marks cover pages)

DAX
Page 6

Lease Commitments
Page 60

Additional Cash Flow 
Information
Page 55

ASIC
Page C3, 3, 14, 28, 29, 30, 31,
32, 35, 48, 63, 67

Audio CODEC
Page C3, 28, 29, 31, 67

Auditors’ Report
Page 41

Automotive
Page C2, 30, 61

Dow Jones Index
Page 6

MP3
Page C2, U3, 3, 14, 67

Earnings per Share
Page 62

Management Board
Page 2, 36

EDGE
Page 17

Nasdaq
Page C4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 63

Employees
Page C1, C2, C4, 15, 31, 33, 34,
35, 36, 52, 58, 63

Nasdaq Composite Index
Page 6

Employees Stock Purchase
Plan
Page 58

Significant Accounting 
Policies
Page 49

SMS
Page 13, 67

Stock Option Plan
Page 58

UMTS
Page 31, 32, 67

Wireless
Page C2, 3, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 48, 49, 61, 63

WAP
Page 13

Nemax all share Index
Page 6, 7

Other Assets and Prepaid
Expenses
Page 56

Other Current Liabilities
Page 56

Power Management
Page C2, C3, 15, 28, 29, 30, 31,
32, 67

Property, Plant and Equip-
ment, net, Intangible
Assets, Investments and
Long-term Financial Assets
Page 55

Quality Management
Page 33, 34

QS 9000
Page 33

Related Party Transactions
Page 62

Research and Development
Page C1, C2, C4, 3, 14, 15, 18,
19, 20, 23, 31, 32, 42, 44, 49,
51, 54

Risk factors
Page 17

Share
Page C1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 26, 36, 39

Segment Reporting
Page 61

Shareholders’ Equity
Page 57

Basis of Presentation and
Acquisitions
Page 48

Bluetooth
Page C3, 14

Environment
Page 14, 15, 29, 33, 34

Financial Instruments
Page 60

Board of Directors
Page 63, 64, 65, 66

Financial Liabilities
Page 56

CDMA
Page 17

Consolidated Statements 
of Income
Page 42

Consolidated Balance
Sheets
Page 43

Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows
Page 44

Consolidated Statements of
Changes in Shareholders’
Equity
Page 45

Consolidated Fixed Assets
Schedule
Page 46

Cumulative Redeemable
Preference Shares
Page 57

FM Radio Audio
Page C3

GSM
Page 3, 13, 31, 67

GPRS
Page 13, 67

Income taxes
Page 53

Independent Auditors’
Report
Page 41

Industrial
Page C2, 30, 61, 68

Inventories
Page 55

Investor Relations
Page 7, 8

ISO 9000, 9001, 14001
Page 33, 36

KPMG Deutsche 
Treuhand-Gesellschaft
Aktiengesellschaft
Page C4, 2, 41, 63

68 Index

Selected Key Figures 1998 - 2000

,

9
5
4
4
1
2

6
4
2
7
8

,

8
7
4
4
4

,

1998

1999

2000

Total Revenues

Revenues by product-type (in thousands of €)

Wireless Communication

Wireline Communication

Automotive

Industrial

Other

2000

180,345

9,501

7,948

15,221

1,444

1999

68,052

2,953

6,980

7,852

1,409

1998

33,359

2,540

1,779

5,337

1,463

214,459

87,246

44,478

Revenues by regions (in thousands of €)

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Other European countries

Malaysia

Other Asian countries

USA

Other countries

2000

40,941

57,866

21,480

35,726

35,582

5,490

14,805

2,569

1999

21,024

29,679

5,737

19,136

5,145

496

5,076

953

1998

13,666

11,333

4,360

6,766

0

2,615

5,429

309

214,459

87,246

44,478

8
9
8
2
2

,

0
0
4
8
3

,

8
6
2

8
0
1
1
1

,

6
5
6
6

,

2
4
1

5
0
1

6
6
5
1
1

,

)
1
1
1
3
5

,

1998

1999

2000

1998

1999

2000

Research and development

Operating profit

1998

1999

2000

Employees

1) Excluding acquired in-process
technology charge of € 9,300.

Our Products:
ASIC Applications

Wireless ASICs

Function

Audio
CODEC

Power
Management

The Audio CODEC subsystem is the critical interface between the real
world analog signals (such as the human voice) and the digital data
processing inside the mobile phone. It is therefore the main contributor to
the voice quality of a mobile phone.

The power management subsystem is responsible for the supply of power
from the battery to the other subsystems and controls their power con-
sumption. The basic function of the power management subsystem is to
generate and monitor all required voltages and currents, to charge and
monitor the battery and to interface with the SIM card.

FM Radio Audio

A recent addition to mobile phone designs, the inclusion of FM radio is an
extension of the Audio CODEC subsystem to handle stereo signals.

MP3

Bluetooth

Handling MP3 data brings music to mobile phones; it decodes a highly
compressed bit stream into CD quality audio turning the phone into a super
compact and lightweight “Walkman“. Music can be either downloaded over
the phone line or loaded from a computer via a Flash memory card or USB
interface.

Bluetooth functionality employs a low power radio link to enable users to
connect a wide range of computing and telecommunications devices easily
and simply, without the need to buy, carry, or connect cables. It will be 
incorporated into a wide range of equipment, mobile phones, automobiles,
computers and peripherals.

Other
applications

Function

Wireline
communication

Line interface ASICs from Dialog enable high-speed digital transmission
within digital telephone and private networks. Custom interfaces for standards
such as T1, ISDN, xDSL feature low noise and low power performance. They
provide the interface between the transmission cable or telephone line and
digital transmission equipment such as routers or modems.

User benefit

Improved
voice quality

Longer
battery life
More talk and
standby time

Added Radio
functionality

Added MP3
functionality

Ease of use

User benefit

Higher
transmission
data rates

Sensors

Sensors are the “eyes and ears“ of automotive control systems. Sensors used
in airbag systems relay signals to an electronic control unit, which determines
deployment of the airbag. Similarly braking and stability control systems rely
on sensors to feed information to their controllers.

Improved 
safety

Motor control

Modern automobiles have electronic motors operating everything from power
windows, air conditioning systems, windshield wipers and to gauges on the
dashboard. The controller function ensures optimum operation at all times.

Sensors and
power 
management

Applied to lighting systems at home or in industry, Dialog ASICs control a
range of lamp technologies enabling fast starting, flicker free dimming and
efficient power management.

Lower cost
Lower weight
Improved safety

Improved
efficiency
Longer bulb life

Investor Information

Annual Meeting

Corporate Calendar

The year 2001 annual meeting of Dialog

April 25, 2001

Semiconductor Plc will be May 17, 2001

Release of first quarter results

9 a.m. Greenwich Mean Time

Conrad International London

May 17, 2001

Chelsea Harbour

Annual shareholders’ meeting

London SW10 0XG

United Kingdom

July 25, 2001

Release of second quarter results

October 24, 2001

Release of third quarter results

Corporate Consel

Certified Public Accountants

Reynolds Porter Chamberlain

KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft

London, United Kingdom

Stuttgart, Germany

US Listing

ADS Administrator

Our Shares are listed on Nasdaq in the form of

ADS holders may instruct The Bank of New York,

American Depositary Shares (ADS). Each ADS

which administers our ADS program, as to 

represents one ordinary share

the exercise of voting rights pertaining there to:

Dialog Semiconductor is subject to the regulations

The Bank of New York

101 Barclay St., 22 West

New York, NY 10286

Dialog

Semiconductor