Dixie Group
Annual Report 2013

Plain-text annual report

2013 ANNUAL REPORT A name synonymous with impeccable styling, exceptional performance and “Quality without Compromise” for 40 years. Fabrica – with a reputation for exquisite style, exceptional performance, and “Quality Without Compromise.” An innovative leader in unsurpassed color, design and craftsmanship since 1866. An impressive selection of fashionable and affordable carpets for the home. ThR ee RemARkAbL e bRAnds, One Rich Legacy Our residential products exemplify originality, innovative construction, and color leadership, backed by our industry leading customer service teams, upholding the celebrated dixie Group legacy. MCR029 annual report ad_final.indd 1 3/5/14 3:13 PM e x T r a o rD i n a r y f l o o r s T h e f o u nD a T i o n o f exT ra orD ina ry inT eriors masland contract believes that truly exclusive design begins with products that accommodate the structural and performance needs of the end user but is also visually and texturally intriguing. With more than a century of experience, masland contract remains on the cutting edge and continues to break new ground in the way of design and manufacturing methods. Transform your spa ce avant contract, the newest addition to The Dixie Group’s family of brands, enters the commercial arena as a predominately modular offering targeted at the high end corporate market. a forward thinking brand, avant utilizes a trending mix of new media and traditional communications to engage the specifying community. MAS565 Annual Report ad_final.indd 1 3/5/14 2:41 PM letter to shareholders Dixie’s performance since the historic downturn of 2008 - 2009 has been exceptional. Looking back at the period since 2009, our carpet sales have grown 68%, while we estimate that the industry grew only around 12%. During this period, our residential sales have grown 88%, while the industry is up less than 10%. Our commercial sales grew 28%, while we estimate that the industry was only up slightly greater than 15%. The growth we have seen has been driven by extensive investment in product, processes and people. The investments we have made have included both capital and operating expenditures, which have impacted our operating earnings during this time period. Our sample expenses, as a percent of carpet sales for the period of 2009-2013, were 32% higher than those for the period from 2006 through 2008. This emphasis on new products, we believe, has been worth the expense, as it has allowed us to gain market share in a difficult time period. In addition, we have invested in yarn processing, new tufting and rug technology, and new dyeing technology as we have grown out of this unprecedented period in our industry. Specifically, we increased our yarn capacity by over 40%. We purchased and started up our new space-dye line, providing us with additional yarn capabilities. We have purchased and upgraded our tufting capabilities for added functionality and lower cost. We purchased, upgraded, and increased the capacity of our Colormaster dyeing facility over the last 15 months. We acquired the top selling product lines from a competitor. We expanded our residential and commercial sales forces. We invested in the Crown rug operation, moving it into our California facility and expanding its production capacity. We bought and are currently integrating the Robertex wool business into our Fabrica and Masland product lines. We brought in new management for our Masland Contract business, initiating a stream of new products to enhance our position within the specified commercial market. We upgraded our modular carpet tile processing equipment to lower cost and improve margins. Further, we launched the Avant product line in 2013 and recently announced both a joint venture and distribution agreement with Desso to expand our penetration in the high-end hospitality market and bring a new set of innovative cradle-to-cradle modular carpet tile products to the North American marketplace. Streamlining our warehouse and distribution network is the remaining major investment needed The Dixie Group | 2013 Annual Report expanding our workforce. Profitably managing this growth is our primary objective as we progress in 2014. As a result of these investments in the future, we have significant headroom for sales growth and the talented people in place to make it happen. We would like to express our appreciation to our customers, our shareholders, and to our Board of Directors, all of whom have given us continued support, and to our associates for their ongoing dedication and hard work. Sincerely, Daniel K. Frierson Chairman and Chief Executive Officer March 12, 2014 to sustain this increase in sales growth. The consolidation of these functions into one facility will be implemented over a 15-month time period. The result from our investments has been a sales increase of nearly 30% in 2013 as compared with that of 2012. Our residential product sales were up over 28% for the year compared to those of 2012; while the industry, we estimate, was up in the mid-single digit range. In the residential market in 2013, we successfully introduced new products, utilizing the Stainmaster® TruSoft™ and PetProtect™ line of fibers: products that we took a lead position in introducing to the marketplace. Additionally, we continued our double-digit growth in wool, continuing our new product success in serving the high-end marketplace. Last year our sales increase in commercial products was 30% as compared with an estimated market growth in the low single digits. Our commercial success over the last year was led by the successful launch of our Speak modular carpet tile and our FIT office remodel collections. All of these changes have come at a significant cost to the company, both financially and in terms of The Dixie Group | 2013 Annual Report at a glance T H E D I X I E G R O U P Fulfilling the promise of our corporate mission of “Quality without Compromise” Fabrica manufactures carpets and rugs for the most demanding segments of the high-end style residential market. Our distinctive broadloom carpet, custom area rugs and hand-tufted rugs have earned Fabrica an international reputation for exquisite style and exceptional performance. At Fabrica, our passion is to be “Best in Class” – blending exquisite style and uncompromising performance in every carpet and rug we produce. Masland Carpets and Rugs was founded in Pennsylvania in 1866 by Charles Henry Masland when he and his brother James opened a dye house in Germantown, Pennsylvania. Today, Masland continues to boast of its heritage as the leading carpet manufacturer in the United States. Since 1866, Masland has insisted that its carpets and rugs maintain the highest quality. The tradition of manufacturing quality products has been practiced for over 145 years and continues to be practiced today. Dixie Home was founded in early 2003 on the premise that fashion and design do not have to be limited to the high end of the market. Since that time, Dixie Home has experienced rapid growth and enthusiastic market acceptance for their stylish designed tufted broadloom carpets that fall within more moderately priced segments of the high-style residential market. The Dixie Group entered the specified contract market in 1993 with the establishment of Masland Contract. A recognized leader in color and design from the start, Masland Contract has become a preferred supplier for the architectural and design communities. Masland Contract offers high style broadloom, modular and area rug products for corporate, hospitality, retail, education, government, and various other segments. Avant Contract—The new Dixie Group brand is focused on becoming an industry trend leader in the commercial soft surface market, both domestically and internationally. The Avant concept allows The Dixie Group to expand its presence in the contract arena and gain additional market share for the commercial division through innovative product introductions and progressive marketing. The Avant Contract brand is predominantly a modular offering designed for the corporate office segment, along with government, higher education and store planning. ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT For The Dixie Group’s Environmental Statement, please refer to the back of this 2013 Annual Report. directors, officers, corporate information directors Daniel K. Frierson(1)(3) Chairman of the Board Charles E. Brock(2)(4) President and Chief Executive Officer, Four Bridges Capital J. Don Brock, Ph.D.(1)(4) Chairman of the Board, Astec Industries, Inc. D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr.(3) Chief Operating Officer, The Dixie Group, Inc. Walter W. Hubbard(2)(4) Retired President and Chief Executive Officer, Honeywell Nylon, Inc. Lowry F. Kline(1)(2)(4) Retired Chairman, Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc. Hilda S. Murray (3)(4) Corporate Secretary and Executive Vice President of TPC Printing & Packaging John W. Murrey, III(2)(4) Retired Michael L. Owens(4) Assistant Dean of Graduate Programs and Lecturer, College of Business, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga (1) Member of Executive Committee (2) Member of Compensation Committee (3) Member of Retirement Plans Committee (4) Member of Audit Committee officers Daniel K. Frierson Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer Jon A. Faulkner Vice President and Chief Financial Officer D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr. Vice President and Chief Operating Officer W. Derek Davis Vice President, Human Resources Paul B. Comiskey Vice President and President, Dixie Residential D. Eugene Lasater Controller V. Lee Martin Vice President and President, Masland Contract Starr T. Klein Secretary corporate information CORPORATE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE The Dixie Group, Inc. 2208 South Hamilton Street | Dalton, Georgia 30721-4974 706.876.5800 INVESTOR CONTACT Jon A. Faulkner, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer The Dixie Group, Inc. 2208 South Hamilton Street | Dalton, Georgia 30721 706.876.5814 CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS 104 Nowlin Lane, Suite 101 | Chattanooga, Tennessee 37421 INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS Ernst & Young LLP 55 Ivan Allen Jr. Blvd. | Suite 1000 Atlanta, Georgia 30308 ANNUAL MEETING The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of The Dixie Group, Inc. will be held at 8:00 A.M. EDT on April 29, 2014, at The Chattanoogan Hotel, Chattanooga, Tennessee STOCK TRANSFER AGENT Computershare Investor Services, LLC PO Box 30170 | College Station, Texas | 77843-3170 STOCK LISTING The Dixie Group’s Common Stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol DXYN LEGAL COUNSEL Miller & Martin PLLC 1000 Volunteer Building 832 Georgia Avenue | Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402 FORM 10-K AND OTHER INFORMATION A copy of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2013, is included with this report. The Dixie Group maintains a website, www.thedixiegroup.com, where additional information, including our investor presentation, may be obtained. The Dixie Group | 2013 Annual Report  UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 28, 2013 OR For the transition period from _________ to ________. Commission File Number 0-2585 The Dixie Group, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Tennessee (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation of organization) 62-0183370 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 104 Nowlin Lane, Suite 101, Chattanooga, TN 37421 (Address of principal executive offices and zip code) (423) 510-7000 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Class Common Stock, $3.00 par value Name of each exchange on which registered NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Title of class None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulations S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes No Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of the Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of "large accelerated filer", "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer Accelerated filer Non-accelerated filer Smaller reporting company Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes No The aggregate market value of the Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on June 28, 2013 (the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed fiscal second quarter) was $88,645,594. The aggregate market value was computed by reference to the closing price of the Common Stock on such date. In making this calculation, the registrant has assumed, without admitting for any purpose, that all executive officers, directors, and holders of more than 10% of a class of outstanding Common Stock, and no other persons, are affiliates. No market exists for the shares of Class B Common Stock, which is neither registered under Section 12 of the Act nor subject to Section 15(d) of the Act. Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of Common Stock as of the latest practicable date. Class Common Stock, $3.00 Par Value Class B Common Stock, $3.00 Par Value Class C Common Stock, $3.00 Par Value Outstanding as of February 28, 2014 12,453,166 shares 866,875 shares 0 shares Specified portions of the following document are incorporated by reference: Proxy Statement of the registrant for annual meeting of shareholders to be held April 29, 2014 (Part III). DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE 1 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. Index to Annual Report on Form 10-K for Year Ended December 28, 2013 PART I Page Item 1. Business Item 1A. Risk Factors Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments Item 2. Item 3. Item 4. Properties Legal Proceedings Mine Safety Disclosures Executive Officers of the Registrant PART II Item 5. Item 6. Item 7. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Selected Financial Data Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Item 8. Item 9. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure Item 9A. Controls and Procedures Item 9B. Other Information Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance Item 11. Executive Compensation PART III Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules Signatures PART IV CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Consolidated Balance Sheets - December 28, 2013 and December 29, 2012 Consolidated Statements of Operations - Years ended December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012, and December 31, 2011 Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) - Years ended December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012, and December 31, 2011 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Years ended December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012, and December 31, 2011 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity - Years ended December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012, and December 31, 2011 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Exhibit Index 2 4 6 9 9 10 10 11 12 15 16 25 25 25 25 26 27 27 27 27 27 28 29 33 35 36 37 38 40 41 71 FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION This Report contains statements that may be considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such statements include the use of terms or phrases such as "expects," "estimates," "projects," "believes," "anticipates," "intends," and similar terms and phrases. Such forward-looking statements relate to, among other matters, our future financial performance, business prospects, growth strategies or liquidity. The following important factors may affect our future results and could cause those results to differ materially from our historical results; these factors include, in addition to those "Risk Factors" detailed in Item 1A of this report, and described elsewhere in this document, the cost and availability of capital, raw material and transportation costs related to petroleum price levels, the cost and availability of energy supplies, the loss of a significant customer or group of customers, materially adverse changes in economic conditions generally in carpet, rug and floorcovering markets we serve and other risks detailed from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 3 Item 1. BUSINESS General Part I. Our business consists principally of marketing, manufacturing and selling carpet and rugs to high-end residential and commercial customers through our various sales forces and brands. A small portion of our manufacturing capacity is used to provide carpet and yarn related services to other manufacturers. From 1920 until 1993 we were exclusively in the textile business. We sold our textile assets and began acquiring floorcovering businesses in 1993. We focus exclusively on the upper-end of the soft floorcovering market where we believe we have strong brands and competitive advantages with our style and design capabilities and customer relationships. Our business is concentrated in areas of the soft floorcovering markets where innovative styling, design, color, quality and service, as well as limited distribution, are welcomed and rewarded. Our Fabrica, Masland, and Dixie Home brands have a significant presence in the high-end residential soft floorcovering markets. Our Masland Contract brand and Avant, a brand launched in 2013, participate in the upper end specified commercial marketplace. Dixie International sells all of our brands outside of the North American market. Our brands are well known, highly regarded and complementary; by being differentiated, we offer meaningful alternatives to the discriminating customer. We have one line of business, carpet and rug manufacturing. Our Brands Fabrica, markets and manufactures luxurious residential carpet and custom rugs, at selling prices that we believe are approximately five times the average for the residential soft floorcovering industry. Its primary customers are interior decorators and designers, selected retailers and furniture stores, luxury home builders and manufacturers of luxury motor coaches and yachts. Fabrica is among the leading premium brands in the domestic marketplace and is known for styling innovation and unique colors and patterns. The Carousel line of products was acquired in 2013 and added to our Fabrica line of products. The Carousel line of products consists of made-to-order, hand-crafted, extremely high quality carpets and area rugs in natural fibers, primarily wool, with a wide variety of patterns and textures manufactured by machine, hand weaving and hand-hooked techniques. Fabrica is viewed by the trade as the premier quality brand for very high-end carpet and enjoys an established reputation as a styling trendsetter and a market leader in providing both custom and designer products to the very high-end residential sector. Masland Residential, founded in 1866, markets and manufactures design-driven specialty carpets and rugs for the high- end residential marketplace. Its residential and commercial broadloom carpet products are marketed at selling prices that we believe are over three times the average for the residential soft floorcovering industry. Its products are marketed through the interior design community, as well as to consumers through specialty floorcovering retailers. Masland Residential has strong brand recognition within the upper-end residential market. Masland Residential competes through innovative styling, color, product design, quality and service. Dixie Home provides stylishly designed, differentiated products that offer affordable fashion to residential consumers. Dixie Home markets an array of tufted broadloom residential and commercial carpet to selected retailers and home centers under the Dixie Home and private label brands. Its objective is to make the Dixie Home brand the choice for styling, service and quality in the more moderately priced sector of the high-end broadloom residential carpet market. Its products are marketed at selling prices which we believe average two times the soft floorcovering industry's average selling price. Masland Contract markets and manufactures broadloom and modular carpet tile for the specified commercial marketplace. Its commercial products are marketed to the architectural and specified design community and directly to commercial end users, as well as to consumers through specialty floorcovering retailers. Masland Contract has strong brand recognition within the upper-end contract market, and competes through innovative styling, color, patterns, quality and service. Avant Contract, a new commercial business launched in 2013, is designed to focus on the corporate office market through multi-line sales agents. These agents carry a broad array of products for the corporate interiors market and will exclusively offer Avant as their soft floorcovering offering. Its modular carpet tile and broadloom product offerings are designed for the interior designer in the upper-end of the contract market who appreciates sophisticated texture, color and patterns with excellent service. 4 Industry The carpet and rug industry has two primary markets, residential and commercial, with the residential market making up the largest portion of the industry's sales. A substantial portion of industry shipments is made in response to replacement demand. Residential products consist of broadloom carpets and rugs in a broad range of styles, colors and textures. Commercial products consist primarily of broadloom carpet and modular carpet tile for a variety of institutional applications such as office buildings, restaurant chains, schools and other commercial establishments. The carpet industry also manufactures carpet for the automotive, recreational vehicle, small boat and other industries. The Carpet and Rug Institute (the "CRI") is the national trade association representing carpet and rug manufacturers. Information compiled by the CRI suggests that the domestic carpet and rug industry is comprised of fewer than 100 manufacturers, with a significant majority of the industry's production concentrated in a limited number of manufacturers focused on the lower end of the price curve. We believe that this industry focus provides us with opportunities to capitalize on our competitive strengths in selected markets where innovative styling, design, product differentiation, focused service and limited distribution add value. Competition The floorcovering industry is highly competitive. We compete with other carpet and rug manufacturers and other types of floorcoverings. We believe our products are among the leaders in styling and design in the high-end residential and high-end commercial carpet markets. However, a number of manufacturers produce competitive products and some of these manufacturers have greater financial resources than we do. We believe the principal competitive factors in our primary soft floorcovering markets are styling, color, product design, quality and service. In the high-end residential and high-end commercial markets, carpet competes with various other types of floorcoverings. Nevertheless, we believe we have competitive advantages in several areas. We have an attractive portfolio of brands that we believe are well known, highly regarded by customers and complementary; by being differentiated, we offer meaningful alternatives to the discriminating customer. We believe our investment in new yarns , such as Stainmaster's® TruSoft™ and PetProtect™, and innovative tufting and dyeing technologies, strengthens our ability to offer product differentiation to our customers. In addition, we have established longstanding relationships with key suppliers in our industry and customers in most of our markets. Finally, our reputation for innovative design excellence and our experienced management team enhance our competitive position. See "Risk Factors" in Item 1A of this report. Backlog Sales order backlog is not material to understanding our business, due to relatively short lead times for order fulfillment in the markets for the vast majority of our products. Trademarks Our floorcovering businesses own a variety of trademarks under which our products are marketed. Among such trademarks, the names "Fabrica", "Masland", "Dixie Home", “Masland Contract” and "Avant" are of greatest importance to our business. We believe that we have taken adequate steps to protect our interest in all significant trademarks. Customer and Product Concentration As a percentage of our net sales, one customer, Lowe's, a mass merchant, accounted for approximately 13% in 2013, 9% in 2012 and 12% in 2011. No other customer was more than 10 percent of our sales during the periods presented. During 2013, sales to our top ten customers accounted for 20% percent of our sales and our top 20 customers accounted for 23% percent of our sales. We do not make a material amount of sales in foreign countries. We do not have any single class of products that accounts for more than 10 percent of our sales. However, sales of our floorcovering products may be classified by significant end-user markets into which we sell, and such information for the past three years is summarized as follows: Residential floorcovering products Commercial floorcovering products Seasonality 2013 74% 26% 2012 75% 25% 2011 71% 29% Our sales historically have normally reached their lowest level in the first quarter (approximately 23% of our annual sales), with the remaining sales being distributed relatively equally between the second, third and fourth quarters. Working capital requirements have normally reached their highest levels in the second and third quarters of the year. 5 Environmental Our operations are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the generation, storage, handling, emission, transportation and discharge of materials into the environment. The costs of complying with environmental protection laws and regulations have not had a material adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations in the past and are not expected to have a material adverse impact in the future. See "Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this report. Raw Materials Our primary raw material is yarn. Nylon is the primary yarn we utilize and, to a lesser extent, polyester and wool yarn is used. Additionally, we utilize polypropylene carpet backing, latex, dyes and chemicals, and man-made topical applications in the construction of our products. Our synthetic yarns are purchased primarily from domestic fiber suppliers and wool is purchased from a number of domestic and international sources. Our other raw materials are purchased primarily from domestic suppliers. Where possible, we pass raw material price increases through to our customers; however, there can be no assurance that price increases can be passed through to customers and that increases in raw material prices will not have an adverse effect on our profitability. See "Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this report. We purchase a significant portion of our primary raw material (nylon yarn) from one supplier. We believe there are other sources of nylon yarn; however, an unanticipated termination or interruption of our supply arrangements could adversely affect our supplies of raw materials and could have a material effect on our operations. See "Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this report. Utilities We use electricity as our principal energy source, with oil or natural gas used in some facilities for finishing operations as well as heating. We have not experienced any material problem in obtaining adequate supplies of electricity, natural gas or oil. Energy shortages of extended duration could have an adverse effect on our operations, and price volatility could negatively impact future earnings. See "Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this report. Working Capital We are required to maintain significant levels of inventory in order to provide the enhanced service levels demanded by the nature of our business and our customers, and to ensure timely delivery of our products. Consistent and dependable sources of liquidity are required to maintain such inventory levels. Failure to maintain appropriate levels of inventory could materially adversely affect our relationships with our customers and adversely affect our business. See "Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this report. Employment Level At December 28, 2013, we employed 1,423 associates in our operations. Available Information Our internet address is www.thedixiegroup.com. We make the following reports filed by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission available, free of charge, on our website under the heading "Investor Relations": 1. annual reports on Form 10-K; 2. quarterly reports on Form 10-Q; 3. current reports on Form 8-K; and 4. amendments to the foregoing reports. The contents of our website are not a part of this report. Item 1A. RISK FACTORS In addition to the other information provided in this Report, the following risk factors should be considered when evaluating the results of our operations, future prospects and an investment in shares of our Common Stock. Any of these factors could cause our actual financial results to differ materially from our historical results, and could give rise to events that might have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The floor covering industry is sensitive to changes in general economic conditions and a decline in residential or commercial construction activity or corporate remodeling and refurbishment could have a material adverse effect on our business. The floor covering industry, in which the Company participates, is highly dependent on general economic conditions, such as consumer confidence and income, corporate and government spending, interest rate levels, availability of credit and demand for housing. The Company derives a majority of its sales from the replacement segment of the market. Therefore, economic 6 changes that result in a significant or prolonged decline in spending for remodeling and replacement activities could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and results of operations. The floor covering industry is highly dependent on construction activity, including new construction, which is cyclical in nature and recently experienced a downturn. The downturn in the U.S. and global economies, along with the residential and commercial markets in such economies, negatively impacted the floor covering industry and the Company’s business. Although the impact of a decline in new construction activity is typically accompanied by an increase in remodeling and replacement activity, these activities lagged during the downturn. Although the difficult economic conditions have improved, there may be additional downturns that could cause the industry to deteriorate in the foreseeable future. A significant or prolonged decline in residential or commercial construction activity could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and results of operations. We have significant levels of sales in certain channels of distribution and reduction in sales through these channels could adversely affect our business. A significant amount of our sales are generated through certain retail and mass merchant channels of distribution. Because we depend on such certain channels of distribution, a significant reduction of sales through these channels could adversely affect our business. We have significant levels of indebtedness that could result in negative consequences to us. We have a significant amount of indebtedness relative to our equity. Insufficient cash flow, profitability or the value of our assets securing our loans could materially adversely affect our ability to generate sufficient funds to satisfy the terms of our senior loan agreements and other debt obligations. Additionally, the inability to access debt or equity markets at competitive rates in sufficient amounts to satisfy our obligations could adversely impact our business. Uncertainty in the credit market or downturns in the economy and our business could affect our overall availability and cost of credit. Uncertainty in the credit markets could affect the overall availability and cost of credit. Despite recent improvement in overall economic conditions, market conditions could impact our ability to obtain financing in the future, including any financing necessary to refinance existing indebtedness, and the cost and terms of it, remains uncertain. These and other economic factors could have a material adverse effect on demand for our products and on its financial condition and operating results. We face intense competition in our industry, which could decrease demand for our products and could have a material adverse effect on our profitability. The floor covering industry is highly competitive. We face competition from a number of domestic manufacturers and independent distributors of floor covering products and, in certain product areas, foreign manufacturers. Significant consolidation within the floor covering industry has caused a number of our existing and potential competitors to grow significantly larger and have greater access to resources and capital than we do. Maintaining our competitive position may require us to make substantial additional investments in our product development efforts, manufacturing facilities, distribution network and sales and marketing activities. These additional investments may be limited by our access to capital, as well as restrictions set forth in our credit facilities. Competitive pressures may also result in decreased demand for our products and in the loss of market share. In addition, we face, and will continue to face, pressure on sales prices of our products from competitors. As a result of any of these factors, there could be a material adverse effect on our sales and profitability. If we are unable to anticipate consumer preferences and successfully develop and introduce new, innovative and updated products, we may not be able to maintain or increase our net revenues and profitability. Our success depends on our ability to identify and originate product trends as well as to anticipate and react to changing consumer demands in a timely manner. All of our products are subject to changing consumer preferences that cannot be predicted with certainty. In addition, long lead times for certain of our products may make it hard for us to quickly respond to changes in consumer demands. Our new products may not receive consumer acceptance as consumer preferences could shift rapidly to different types of flooring products or away from these types of products altogether, and our future success depends in part on our ability to anticipate and respond to these changes. Failure to anticipate and respond in a timely manner to changing consumer preferences could lead to, among other things, lower sales and excess inventory levels, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition. Raw material prices may increase and the inability to pass any such increases to our customers could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. The prices of raw materials and fuel-related costs vary significantly with market conditions. In particular, our business requires the purchase of large volumes of nylon and polyester yarn, as well as wool yarns, synthetic backing, latex, and dyes. Increases in the cost of these raw materials could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition if 7 we are unable to pass these increases through to our customers. Although we generally attempt to pass on increases in raw material, energy and fuel-related costs to our customers, our ability to do so is dependent upon the rate and magnitude of any increase, competitive pressures and market conditions for our products. There have been in the past, and may be in the future, periods of time during which increases in these costs cannot be recovered. During such periods of time, our business may be materially adversely affected. Unanticipated termination or interruption of our arrangements with third-party suppliers of nylon yarn could have a material adverse effect on us. Nylon yarn is the principal raw material used in our floor covering products. A significant portion of such yarn is purchased from one supplier. Our yarn supplier is on the of the leading fiber suppliers within the industry and is the exclusive supplier of certain innovative branded fiber technology upon which we rely. We believe our offerings of this innovative fiber technology contribute materially to the competiveness of our products. While we believe there are other sources of nylon yarns, an unanticipated termination or interruption of our current supply of nylon yarn could have a material adverse effect on our ability to supply our product to our customers and have a material adverse impact on our competitiveness if we are unable to replace our nylon supplier with another supplier that can offer similar innovative fiber products. An extended interruption in the supply of these or other raw materials or sourced products used in the Company’s business or in the supply of suitable substitute materials or products would disrupt the Company’s operations, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business. We may experience certain risks associated with acquisitions, joint ventures and strategic investments. We have recently embarked on several strategic and tactical initiatives, including acquisitions and investment in new products, to strengthen our future and to enable us to return to sustained growth and profitability. Growth through acquisitions involves risks, many of which may continue to affect us after the acquisition. An acquired company may not achieve the levels of revenue, profitability and production that we expect. The combination of an acquired company’s business with ours involves risks. Reported earnings may not meet expectations because of goodwill and intangible asset impairment, other asset impairments, increased interest costs and issuance of additional securities or debt as a result of these acquisitions. We may also face challenges in consolidating functions and integrating our organizations, procedures, operations and product lines in a timely and efficient manner. The diversion of management attention and any difficulties encountered in the transition and integration process could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, level of expenses and operating results. Failure to successfully manage and integrate an acquisition with our existing operations could lead to the potential loss of customers of the acquired business, the potential loss of employees who may be vital to the new operations, the potential loss of business opportunities or other adverse consequences that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Even if integration occurs successfully, failure of the acquisition to achieve levels of anticipated sales growth, profitability or productivity, or otherwise perform as expected, may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We are subject to various environmental, safety and health regulatory governance that may subject us to costs, liabilities and other obligations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. We are subject to various environmental, safety and health and other regulations that may subject us to costs, liabilities and other obligations which could have a material adverse effect on our business. The applicable requirements under these laws are subject to amendment, to the imposition of new or additional requirements and to changing interpretations of agencies or courts. We could incur material expenditures to comply with new or existing regulations, including fines and penalties and increased costs of its operations. Additionally, future laws, ordinances or regulations could give rise to additional compliance or remediation costs that could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Various federal, state and local environmental laws govern the use of our current and former facilities. These laws govern such matters as: • Discharge to air and water; • Handling and disposal of solid and hazardous substances and waste, and • Remediation of contamination from releases of hazardous substances in our facilities and off-site disposal locations. Our operations also are governed by laws relating to workplace safety and worker health, which, among other things, establish noise standards and regulate the use of hazardous materials and chemicals in the workplace. We have taken, and will continue to take, steps to comply with these laws. If we fail to comply with present or future environmental or safety regulations, we could be subject to future liabilities. However, we cannot ensure that complying with these environmental or health and safety laws and requirements will not adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. 8 We may be exposed to litigation, claims and other legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business relating to our products or business, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In the ordinary course of business, we are subject to a variety of work-related and product-related claims, lawsuits and legal proceedings, including those relating to product liability, product warranty, product recall, personal injury, and other matters that are inherently subject to many uncertainties regarding the possibility of a loss our business. Such matters could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition if we are unable to successfully defend against or resolve these matters or if our insurance coverage is insufficient to satisfy any judgments against us or settlements relating to these matters. Although we have product liability insurance, the policies may not provide coverage for certain claims against us or may not be sufficient to cover all possible liabilities. Further, we may not be able to maintain insurance at commercially acceptable premium levels. Additionally, adverse publicity arising from claims made against us, even if the claims are not successful, could adversely affect our reputation or the reputation and sales of our products. Our business operations could suffer significant losses from natural disasters, catastrophes, fire or other unexpected events. Many of our business activities involve substantial investments in manufacturing facilities and many products are produced at a limited number of locations. These facilities could be materially damaged by natural disasters, such as floods, tornadoes, hurricanes and earthquakes, or by fire or other unexpected events. We could incur uninsured losses and liabilities arising from such events, including damage to our reputation, and/or suffer material losses in operational capacity, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Item 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS None. Item 2. PROPERTIES The following table lists our facilities according to location, type of operation and approximate total floor space as of February 28, 2014: Location Administrative: Dalton, GA* Saraland, AL Santa Ana, CA Chattanooga, TN* Calhoun, GA Type of Operation Administrative Administrative Administrative Administrative Administrative Total Administrative Manufacturing and Distribution: Atmore, AL Saraland, AL Saraland, AL* Roanoke, AL Santa Ana, CA Calhoun, GA * Calhoun, GA Chatsworth, GA * Eton, GA Carpet Manufacturing, Distribution Carpet Tile Manufacturing, Distribution Samples and Rug Manufacturing, Distribution Carpet Yarn Processing Carpet and Rug Manufacturing, Distribution Carpet Wool Manufacturing Carpet Dyeing & Processing Samples and Distribution Carpet Manufacturing, Distribution Total Manufacturing and Distribution * Leased properties TOTAL Approximate Square Feet 16,000 29,000 4,000 3,500 10,600 63,100 610,000 384,000 132,000 204,000 200,000 99,000 193,300 79,600 408,000 2,309,900 2,373,000 In addition to the facilities listed above, we lease a small amount of office space in various locations. In addition, during 2013, we entered into a lease for a 292,000 square feet distribution facility which will commence on May 1, 2014. 9 In our opinion, our manufacturing facilities are well maintained and our machinery is efficient and competitive. Operations of our facilities generally vary between 120 and 168 hours per week. Substantially all of our owned properties are subject to mortgages, which secure the outstanding borrowings under our senior credit facilities. Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS At December 28, 2013, the Company was a plaintiff in a lawsuit against a former raw material supplier. In its lawsuit, the Company alleges that the former supplier sold defective materials to the Company over a period of time, which, when applied to certain of the Company’s products, caused those products to become defective and unmerchantable in the ordinary course of the Company’s business. On January 31, 2014, the Company and the supplier settled the Company's claim for $400 thousand. Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES Not applicable. 10 Pursuant to instruction G of Form 10-K the following is included as an unnumbered item to PART I. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT The names, ages, positions and offices held by the executive officers of the registrant as of February 28, 2014, are listed below along with their business experience during the past five years. Name, Age and Position Business Experience During Past Five Years Daniel K. Frierson, 72 Chairman of the Board, and Chief Executive Officer, Director Director since 1973, Chairman of the Board since 1987 and Chief Executive Officer since 1980. He is the Chairman of the Company's Executive Committee and Retirement Plans Committee. He serves as Director of Astec Industries, Inc. headquartered in Chattanooga, Tennessee; and Louisiana-Pacific Corporation headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee. D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr., 47 Vice President and Chief Operating Officer Director since 2012 and Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since August 2009. Vice President and President Masland Residential from February 2006 to July 2009. President Masland Residential from December 2005 to January 2006. Executive Vice President and General Manager, Dixie Home, 2003 to 2005. Business Unit Manager, Bretlin, 2002 to 2003. Jon A. Faulkner, 53 Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since October 2009. Vice President of Planning and Development from February 2002 to September 2009. Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing for Steward, Inc. from 1997 to 2002. Paul B. Comiskey, 62 Vice President and President, Dixie Residential Vice President and President of Dixie Residential since August 2009. Vice President and President, Dixie Home from February 2007 to July 2009. President, Dixie Home from December 2006 to January 2007. Senior Vice President of Residential Sales, Mohawk Industries, Inc. from 1998 to 2006. Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing for World Carpets from 1996 to 1998. V. Lee Martin, 62 Vice President and President, Masland Contract President, Masland Contract since August 2012 and Vice President since February 2013. President, Step 2 Surfaces, LLC from 2011 to August 2012. Corporate Vice President, Sales and Marketing, for J & J Industries from 1994 to 2011. W. Derek Davis, 63 Vice President, Human Resources Vice President of Human Resources since January 1991. Corporate Employee Relations Director, 1988 to 1991. D. Eugene Lasater, 63 Controller Controller since 1988. Starr T. Klein, 71 Secretary Secretary since November 1992. Assistant Secretary, 1987 to 1992. The executive officers of the registrant are generally elected annually by the Board of Directors at its first meeting held after each annual meeting of our shareholders. 11 Part II. Item 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES Our Common Stock trades on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol DXYN. No market exists for our Class B Common Stock. As of February 28, 2014, the total number of holders of our Common Stock was approximately 2,350 including an estimated 1,900 shareholders who hold our Common Stock in nominee names, but excluding approximately 580 participants in our 401(k) plan who may direct the voting of the shares allocated to their accounts. The total number of holders of our Class B Common Stock was 12. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities None. Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities The following table provides information regarding our repurchases of shares of our Common Stock during the three months ended December 28, 2013: Fiscal Month Ending November 2, 2013 November 30, 2013 December 28, 2013 Three Fiscal Months Ended December 28, 2013 Total Number of Shares Purchased Average Price Paid Per Share — $ — — — $ — — — — Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (1) Maximum Number (or approximate dollar value) of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under Plans or Programs — — — — $ 4,268,461 (1) On August 8, 2007, we announced a program to repurchase up to $10 million of our Common Stock. 12 Quarterly Financial Data, Dividends and Price Range of Common Stock Following are quarterly financial data, dividends and price range of Common Stock for the four quarterly periods in the years ended December 28, 2013 and December 29, 2012. Due to rounding, the totals of the quarterly information for each of the years reflected below may not necessarily equal the annual totals. The discussion of restrictions on payment of dividends is included in Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein. THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA, DIVIDENDS AND PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK (unaudited) (dollars in thousands, except per share data) 2013 Net sales Gross profit Operating income Income from continuing operations Loss from discontinued operations Net income Basic earnings per share: Continuing operations Discontinued operations Net income Diluted earnings per share: Continuing operations Discontinued operations Net income Common Stock Prices: High Low 2012 Net sales Gross profit Operating income (loss) Income (loss) from continuing operations Loss from discontinued operations Net income (loss) Basic earnings (loss) per share: Continuing operations Discontinued operations Net income (loss) Diluted earnings (loss) per share: Continuing operations Discontinued operations Net income (loss) Common Stock Prices: High Low 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 75,440 18,412 1,677 651 (15) 636 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 5.93 3.24 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 83,617 22,302 3,271 1,677 (32) 1,645 0.13 — 0.13 0.13 — 0.13 9.38 5.30 90,210 22,100 1,830 1,432 (20) 1,412 0.11 — 0.11 0.11 — 0.11 12.05 7.43 1ST 2ND 3RD $ 62,851 15,703 620 (104) (77) (181) $ (0.01) $ — (0.01) $ (0.01) $ — (0.01) $ $ 66,566 15,719 (40) (404) (29) (433) $ (0.03) $ — (0.03) $ (0.03) $ — (0.03) $ 65,822 16,557 820 269 (167) 102 0.02 (0.01) 0.01 0.02 (0.01) 0.01 $ 4.79 2.83 $ 4.25 3.20 3.90 3.02 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 95,799 22,825 1,813 1,598 (1) 1,597 0.12 — 0.12 0.12 — 0.12 13.85 9.15 4TH 71,134 17,395 415 (413) (2) (415) (0.03) — (0.03) (0.03) — (0.03) 4.38 2.95 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 13 Shareholder Return Performance Presentation We compare our performance to two different industry indexes published by Dow Jones, Inc. The first of these is the Dow Jones Furnishings Index, which is composed of publicly traded companies classified by Dow Jones in the furnishings industry. The second is the Dow Jones Building Materials & Fixtures Index, which is composed of publicly traded companies classified by Dow Jones in the building materials and fixtures industry. In accordance with SEC rules, set forth below is a line graph comparing the yearly change in the cumulative total shareholder return on our Common Stock against the total return of the Standard & Poor's 600 Stock Index, plus both the Dow Jones Furnishings Index and the Dow Jones Building Materials & Fixtures Index, in each case for the five year period ended December 28, 2013. The comparison assumes that $100.00 was invested on December 27, 2008, in our Common Stock, the S&P 600 Index, and each of the two Peer Groups, and assumes the reinvestment of dividends. The foregoing shareholder performance presentation shall not be deemed "soliciting material" or to be "filed" with the Commission subject to Regulation 14A, or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. 14 Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA The Dixie Group, Inc. Historical Summary (dollars in thousands, except share and per share data) FISCAL YEARS OPERATIONS Net sales Gross profit Operating income (loss) Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes Income tax provision (benefit) Income (loss) from continuing operations Depreciation and amortization Dividends Capital expenditures Assets purchased under capital leases FINANCIAL POSITION Total assets Working capital Long-term debt Stockholders' equity PER SHARE Income (loss) from continuing operations: Basic Diluted Dividends: Common Stock Class B Common Stock Book value GENERAL Weighted-average common shares outstanding: Basic Diluted Number of shareholders (4) Number of associates 2013 2012 2011 (1) 2010 (2) 2009 (3) $ 345,066 $ 266,372 $ 270,110 $ 231,322 $ 203,480 85,639 8,591 4,715 (643) 5,358 10,262 — 11,438 1,865 65,372 1,815 (1,054) (401) (653) 9,396 — 3,386 666 65,506 56,651 5,668 1,956 684 1,272 9,649 — 6,740 14 (2,570) (6,977) (2,604) (4,373) 11,575 — 1,771 127 52,106 (45,389) (50,729) (8,870) (41,859) 13,504 — 2,436 — $ 248,866 $ 201,770 $ 182,943 $ 180,929 $ 181,944 95,679 101,759 70,771 76,958 80,166 64,046 66,417 65,357 64,385 56,496 58,070 62,430 52,616 59,349 66,349 $ 0.40 0.40 — — 5.32 $ (0.05) $ (0.05) — — 4.88 0.10 0.10 — — 4.99 $ (0.35) $ (0.35) — — 4.86 (3.39) (3.39) — — 5.20 12,736,835 12,637,657 12,585,396 12,524,358 12,330,648 12,851,917 12,637,657 12,623,054 12,524,358 12,330,648 2,350 1,423 1,800 1,200 1,750 1,171 1,750 1,150 1,860 1,050 (1) Includes income of $563, or $356 net of tax, for facility consolidation and severance in 2011. (2) Includes expenses of $1,556, or $1,008 net of tax, for facility consolidation and severance costs in 2010. (3) Includes expenses of $36,956, or $32,055 net of tax, for the impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets and facility consolidation and severance costs in 2009. (4) The approximate number of record holders of our Common Stock for 2009 through 2013 includes Management's estimate of shareholders who held our Common Stock in nominee names as follows: 2009 - 1,300 shareholders; 2010 - 1,250 shareholders; 2011 - 1,250 shareholders; 2012 - 1,255 shareholders; 2013 - 1,900 shareholders. 15 Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this report. OVERVIEW Publicly reported information has reflected improved factors in the economy in the United States that have positively affected the carpet industry beginning in the latter half of 2012 throughout 2013 with continuing improvement anticipated in 2014. These factors include an increase in new and existing home sales, residential remodeling and an increase in residential and commercial investment as a percentage of the United States Gross Domestic Product. We believe our business, driven more by resale and remodeling of existing homes and commercial facilities, has been positively affected by this overall market improvement during these periods. While our business was more deeply affected by the economic crisis as it reached the higher end markets where our business is concentrated, we believe our position in the upper end of the markets has permitted us to benefit from improved conditions and will allow us to take advantage of further anticipated growth in the upper end markets. Our residential and commercial sales growth rate for 2013 compared with 2012 was significantly above that of the industry. During 2013 and 2012, we embarked upon several strategic and tactical initiatives that we believe will permit us to strengthen our future and allow us to return to sustained growth and profitability, although certain of these actions negatively impacted our results in 2013 and 2012. These items, further discussed below, include the investment in the development of certain new products, the acquisition of a continuous dyeing facility in North Georgia, the acquisition of certain rug manufacturing equipment and related business, realignment of certain of our broadloom tufting technologies from Atmore, Alabama into our North Georgia Eton facility, an opportunistic purchase of certain products from an industry competitor to incorporate into our product line and changes in both manufacturing and commercial business management during 2012. During 2013, we expanded our yarn processing capabilities at our Roanoke, Alabama yarn processing facility to support our growth with internal supply and lessen our dependence on externally supplied yarn requirements and acquired a wool manufacturing facility in Calhoun, Georgia that will permit us to enhance our wool processing capabilities and related product offerings. In addition, during 2013 we acquired certain dyeing technology we did not previously have that will further enhance our ability to provide a broader array of differentiated products. We have taken advantage of several opportunities to invest in products we believe will further differentiate us from the competition. We have access to two new yarn systems that have been limited in distribution and, we believe, will provide exceptional softness and colorfastness qualities. In addition, we have developed a new “permaset process” for wool which we believe will allow our designer customers the broadest possible choice of colorations. As a result, during 2012 we invested at an increased rate in sampling initiatives related to these product offerings as compared to the same periods in the prior year. During 2013, we have seen positive market acceptance for the products associated with these investments. During 2012, we relocated certain of our tufting technologies from our manufacturing facility in Atmore, Alabama to our facility in Eton, Georgia to achieve a more favorable cost structure for the products and markets served from those technologies. The tufting realignment was completed during 2012. This realignment resulted in incremental operating costs of approximately $926 thousand during 2012. This realignment positively affected our costs, manufacturing capabilities and costs structure during 2013. On November 2, 2012, we acquired a continuous carpet dyeing facility in Calhoun, Georgia. The acquisition of this dyeing operation has allowed us to transition certain of our products from our beck dyeing operation in Atmore, Alabama and from other third party commission continuous dyeing operations located in North Georgia. This has allowed us to achieve significant cost reductions in the dyeing process and and the capacity to support future growth. The purchase price of this acquisition consisted of a $5.5 million, seller financed note, a cash payment of $239 thousand and $823 thousand representing the fair value of a five year, below market agreement to process certain of the seller's products on a commission basis during this period as we ramp up the dyeing of our products. In conjunction with the acquisition of these assets, we are in the process of assessing all of our dyeing and ancillary assets to determine whether and to what extent further rationalization of assets would be advisable. On November 28, 2012, we acquired certain specialized wool rug tufting equipment and the associated business for total consideration valued at $2.6 million, consisting of $958 thousand of cash paid, $471 thousand representing the fair value of cash to be paid in equal installments over a three-year period and $1.1 million representing the fair value of contingent consideration over a three-year period. We were the major consumer of products produced by the seller on the equipment. The acquisition has allowed us to reduce our cost by permitting us to produce the goods in-house. Additionally, this has allowed us to support what we believe to be good growth potential in markets we currently serve and provide access to other markets. Additionally, during 2012, we made a change in our manufacturing management in connection with the realignment and relocation of our tufting equipment. We also brought in new leadership for our commercial business in an effort to strengthen our performance in our commercial sector. These actions resulted in incremental costs of approximately $600 thousand in 2012. 16 We believe the management changes have positively affected our commercial business in terms of sales growth, manufacturing cost improvements and return on investment. On June 30, 2013, we completed the acquisition of Robertex Associates, Inc., a high-end manufacturer of specialty wool floorcovering products marketed under the names of “Robertex” and “Carousel”. This acquisition will allow us to strengthen our position in our wool product line where we have seen strong growth, although these products appeal to a more select and discriminating customer base. The purchase price of the acquisition was approximately $6.0 million, plus additional consideration contingent upon growth in gross margins of selected products for five years subsequent to the acquisition. In order to appropriately support the increased wool business, we are realigning certain manufacturing equipment in this facility and infrastructure across our Company related to wool products. As our wool production capabilities are being expanded and enhanced, we are developing new products and investing in increased product sampling for these products. Until such time that all of these actions have been completed and products are in the field, there will be a negative effect on our results. Subsequent to our 2013 year end, on January 20, 2014, our Board of Directors approved a 2014 Warehousing/Distribution/ Manufacturing Restructuring Plan intended to align our warehousing, distribution and manufacturing to support our growth and manufacturing strategy. The plan is intended to create a better cost structure and improve distribution capabilities and customer service. The key element and first major step of this plan is the leasing and occupancy of a 292,000 square foot finished goods warehouse, cut-order and distribution facility in Adairsville, Georgia; such lease and occupancy to commence as of May 1, 2014. We expect the plan to be substantially completed in the second quarter of the fiscal year ending December 26, 2015. We currently expect the implementation of this plan will result in total restructuring expenses of approximately $2.4 million, with approximately $1.3 million of such expenses during the fiscal year ending December 27, 2014 and approximately $1.1 million of such expenses during the fiscal year ending December 26, 2015, primarily consisting of moving and relocation expenses, information technology expenses and expenses relating to conversion and realignment of equipment. We remain optimistic about conditions that affect the higher-end residential markets we serve and continue to address initiatives in our commercial offerings related to our products, manufacturing processes and distribution alternatives. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based on our Consolidated Financial Statements that were prepared in accordance with U. S. generally accepted accounting principles. Each of our 2013 and 2012 quarterly fiscal periods contained 13 operating weeks. Our first quarter of 2011 contained 14 operating weeks while our second through fourth quarters of 2011 contained 13 operating weeks; therefore, 2013 and 2012 contained 52 operating weeks compared with 53 operating weeks in 2011. Discussions below related to percentage changes in net sales in 2012 compared with 2011 have been adjusted to reflect the comparable number of weeks and are qualified with the term “net sales as adjusted”. We believe "net sales as adjusted" will assist our financial statement users in understanding the rate of growth in our business in the comparative periods. (See reconciliation of net sales to net sales as adjusted in the table below.) Reconciliation of Net Sales to Net Sales as Adjusted Fiscal Year Ended Percent Increase (Decrease) December 28, 2013 December 29, 2012 December 31, 2011 2013 vs. 2012 2012 vs. 2011 Net sales as reported Adjustment to net sales: Impact of shipping weeks Net sales as adjusted $ $ 345,066 $ 266,372 $ 270,110 29.5% (1.4)% — — (4,711) 345,066 $ 266,372 $ 265,399 29.5% 0.4 % 17 The following table sets forth certain elements of our continuing operations as a percentage of net sales for the periods indicated: Net sales Cost of sales Gross profit Selling and administrative expenses Other operating (income) expense, net Facility consolidation and severance expense, net Operating income Fiscal Year Ended December 28, 2013 December 29, 2012 December 31, 2011 100.0% 100.0% 100.0 % 75.2% 24.8% 22.2% 0.1% —% 2.5% 75.5% 24.5% 23.8% —% —% 0.7% 75.7 % 24.3 % 22.5 % (0.1)% (0.2)% 2.1 % Fiscal Year Ended December 28, 2013 Compared with Fiscal Year Ended December 29, 2012 Net Sales. Net sales for the year ended December 28, 2013 were $345.1 million compared with $266.4 million in the year-earlier period, an increase of 29.5% for the year-over-year comparison. The carpet industry reported a percentage increase in the mid- single digits in net sales in 2013 compared with 2012. Our 2013 year-over-year carpet sales comparison reflected an increase of 28.9% in net sales. Sales of residential carpet are up 28.5% and sales of commercial carpet increased 30.1%. Revenue from carpet yarn processing and carpet dyeing and finishing services increased $4.1 million in 2013 compared with 2012. We believe our residential and commercial sales were positively affected primarily as a result of the introduction of new products and the expansion of our wool products. Cost of Sales. Cost of sales, as a percentage of net sales, was basically unchanged in 2013 compared with 2012. Cost of sales in 2013 included approximately $5.1 million of costs associated with acquisitions in late 2012 and 2013 as well as certain process realignment and expansion initiatives undertaken during 2013. Cost of sales in 2012 included incremental costs of approximately $1.4 million related to tufting equipment relocations and costs related to the transition of products from our beck dyeing operations to our continuous dyeing operations acquired in the fourth quarter of 2012. Gross Profit. Gross profit increased $20.3 million in 2013 compared with 2012. The increase in gross profit was primarily attributable to higher sales. Gross profit in 2013 and 2012 was negatively affected by the incremental costs discussed above related to costs of sales. Selling and Administrative Expenses. Selling and administrative expenses were $76.6 million in 2013 compared with $63.5 million in 2012, a decline of 1.6 percentage points as a percentage of sales in 2013 compared with 2012. Selling and administrative costs in 2013 included approximately $1.8 million of sampling costs incurred to incorporate the new wool products associated with the Robertex acquisition and our launch of a new tile product line. 2012 included $1.7 million related to investment in the development and sampling of new product initiatives, $409 thousand for incremental costs related to the two acquisitions and $600 thousand of costs related to management changes. Other Operating (Income) Expense, Net. Net other operating (income) expense was $494 thousand in 2013 compared with $68 thousand in 2012. The change in 2013 was due to the disposal of certain manufacturing assets taken out of service, losses on currency valuations and settlement of a claim against a supplier. Operating Income. Operating income was $8.6 million in 2013 compared with operating income of $1.8 million in 2012. The increase in 2013 was primarily a result of the increased level of sales in 2013, less the variable selling expenses associated with the sales increase. Interest Expense. Interest expense increased $610 thousand in 2013 principally due to higher levels of debt to support our growth, including an increase in debt related to business acquisitions in late 2012 and during mid-2013. Other (Income) Expense, Net. Other (income) expense, net was an expense of $26 thousand in 2013 compared to income of $277 thousand in 2012. The change was primarily the result of a $187 thousand gain recognized on the sale of a non-operating asset in 2012. Income Tax Provision (Benefit). Our income tax provision was a benefit of $643 thousand in 2013 on positive earnings primarily as a result of the reversal of $1.2 million of previously established reserves for state income tax loss and tax credit carryforwards. The reversal of the reserves was based on a number of factors including current and future earnings assumptions by taxing jurisdiction. Additionally, 2013 included certain tax credits of approximately $520 thousand related to the years 2009 - 2011 determined to be available for utilization and $304 thousand of 2012 research and development tax credits that could not be recognized until the extension of the credit was approved by Congress in 2013. Our effective income tax benefit rate was 38.0% in 2012. The effective tax rate varied from statutory rates in 2012 primarily as a result of adjustments to 18 estimates used in the 2011 estimated tax calculations versus amounts used in the subsequent tax return filing for the 2011 period, net of the effects of permanent differences on the lower level of pre-tax earnings in the 2012 tax calculations. Net Income (Loss). Continuing operations reflected income of $5.4 million, or $0.40 per diluted share in 2013, compared with a loss from continuing operations of $653 thousand, or $0.05 per diluted share in 2012. Our discontinued operations reflected a loss of $68 thousand, or $0.01 per diluted share in 2013, compared with a loss of $274 thousand, or $0.02 per diluted share in 2012. Including discontinued operations, our net income was $5.3 million, or $0.39 per diluted share, in 2013 compared with a net loss of $927 thousand, or $0.07 per diluted share, in 2012. Fiscal Year Ended December 29, 2012 Compared with Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2011 Net Sales. Net sales for the year ended December 29, 2012 were $266.4 million compared with $270.1 million in the year-earlier period, a decrease of 1.4% for the year-over-year comparison. Net sales in 2012 reflected an increase of 0.4% compared with 2011 on a "net sales as adjusted" basis. The carpet industry reported a percentage increase in the low single digits in net sales in 2012. Our 2012 year-over-year carpet sales comparison reflected a decrease of 1.8% in net sales, or 0.1% on a "net sales as adjusted" basis. Sales of residential carpet are up 2.5%, or 4.3% on a "net sales as adjusted" basis and sales of commercial carpet declined 12.7%, or 11.1% on a "net sales as adjusted" basis. Revenue from carpet yarn processing and carpet dyeing and finishing services increased $1.1 million in 2012 compared with 2011. Cost of Sales. Cost of sales, as a percentage of net sales, was basically unchanged; a decrease of 0.2 percentage points in 2012 compared with 2011. Cost of sales included costs of approximately $926 thousand in 2012 related to tufting equipment relocations. Other manufacturing efficiencies and cost improvements more than offset these relocation costs. Gross Profit. Gross profit was basically unchanged in both total dollars and as a percentage of net sales in 2012 compared with 2011. Gross profit on lower sales in 2012 was affected by costs of approximately $926 thousand incurred in 2012 related to tufting equipment relocations. However, we experienced more favorable product mix in our residential products in 2012 compared with 2011. Selling and Administrative Expenses. Selling and administrative expenses reflected an increase of $2.8 million, or 1.3 percentage points as a percentage of sales in 2012 compared with 2011. The increase is primarily a result of an increase of $1.7 million related to investment in the development and sampling of new product initiatives, $409 thousand for costs related to the two acquisitions and $600 thousand of costs related to management changes. Other Operating (Income) Expense, Net. Net other operating expense was $68 thousand in 2012 compared with net other operating income of $266 thousand in 2011. The change was due to a settlement gain of $492 thousand recognized in 2011 related to a company-owned insurance policy, net of a decrease in certain retirement related expenses of $170 thousand in 2012 compared with 2011. Facility Consolidation and Severance (Benefit) Expense, Net. Facility consolidation and severance expenses reflected a cost reduction of $563 thousand in 2011. The gain in 2011 was a result of the favorable settlement of a lease obligation in 2011 compared with the amount previously reserved under our restructuring plan. Operating Income (Loss). Operating income was $1.8 million in 2012 compared with operating income of $5.7 million in 2011. The decrease in 2012 was primarily a result of the higher selling and administrative expenses and gains in 2011 related to the facilities consolidation and company-owned life insurance of $563 thousand and $492 thousand, respectively. Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased $324 thousand in 2012 principally due to lower interest rates in 2012 compared with 2011. Other (Income) Expense, Net. Other income was $277 thousand in 2012 compared with income of $75 thousand in 2011, an improvement of $202 thousand. The change was primarily the result of a gain recognized on the sale of a non-operating asset in 2012. Refinancing Expenses. Expenses of $317 thousand were recorded in the third quarter of 2011 related to refinancing our senior credit and term loan facility and included the costs associated with the extinguishment or modification of existing debt and the addition of new debt arrangements. Income Tax Provision (Benefit). Our effective income tax benefit rate was 38.0% in 2012, compared with an effective income tax provision rate of 35.0% in 2011. The effective tax rate varied from statutory rates in 2012 primarily as a result of adjustments to estimates used in the 2011 estimated tax calculations versus amounts used in the subsequent tax return filing for the 2011 period, net of the effects of permanent differences on the lower level of pre-tax earnings in the 2012 tax calculations. Net Income (Loss). Continuing operations reflected a loss of $653 thousand, or $0.05 per diluted share in 2012, compared with income from continuing operations of $1.3 million, or $0.10 per diluted share in 2011. Our discontinued operations reflected a loss of $274 thousand, or $0.02 per diluted share in 2012, compared with a loss of $286 thousand, or $0.02 per diluted share in 19 2011. Including discontinued operations, our net loss was $927 thousand, or $0.07 per diluted share, in 2012 compared with net income of $986 thousand, or $0.08 per diluted share, in 2011. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES We believe our operating cash flows, credit availability under our senior loan and security agreement and other sources of financing are adequate to finance our normal foreseeable liquidity requirements. However, deterioration in our markets or significant additional cash expenditures above our normal liquidity requirements could require supplemental financing or other funding sources. There can be no assurance that such supplemental financing or other sources of funding can be obtained or will be obtained on terms favorable to us. Cash Sources and Uses. During the year ended December 28, 2013, cash provided from financing activities was $19.2 million. $5.9 million was used to fund our operating activities, $11.4 million to invest in property, plant and equipment and $2.2 million cash paid in business combination. Working capital increased $18.7 million in 2013, including an increase in inventories of $21.4 million to support higher levels of business activity and an increase of $11.6 million in accounts receivable primarily related to the higher level of sales. Additionally, other current assets increased approximately $2.0 million as a result of deposits related to equipment financing arrangements and the current portion of deferred tax assets. Accounts payable increased $6.8 million in 2013 compared with 2012 primarily as a result raw material purchases associated with the increased levels of business and accrued expenses increased $7.1 million primarily as a result of significant growth in our business during 2013. Additionally, the current portion of debt reflected an increase of $2.2 million as of the 2013 balance sheet date compared with the 2012 comparative period related to increases in funded debt levels outside of our revolving facility. Capital expenditures, excluding assets acquired under business acquisitions, were $13.3 million in 2013; $11.4 million through funded debt and $1.9 million of equipment acquired under capital leases, $4.1 million in 2012 and $6.8 million in 2011. Depreciation and amortization were $10.3 million in 2013, $9.4 million in 2012 and $9.6 million in 2011. A significant portion of capital expenditures in 2013 were directed toward expanding manufacturing capabilities while capital expenditures in 2012 and 2011 were directed to a greater degree toward new and more efficient manufacturing capabilities and, to a lesser extent in each year, computer software enhancements. We expect capital expenditures to be approximately $16 million in 2014, while depreciation and amortization are expected to be approximately $12 million. Planned capital expenditures in 2014 are primarily directed toward both new manufacturing equipment and an expansion and realignment of our warehousing, cut order, distribution and certain manufacturing processes. Senior Credit Facility. On September 14, 2011, we entered into a five-year, secured revolving credit facility (the "senior credit facility"). The senior credit facility provided for a maximum of $90.0 million of revolving credit, subject to borrowing base availability, including limited amounts of credit in the form of letters of credit and swingline loans. The borrowing base was equal to specified percentages of our eligible accounts receivable, inventories and fixed assets less reserves established, from time to time, by the administrative agent under the senior credit facility. We can use the proceeds of the senior credit facility for general corporate purposes, including financing acquisitions and refinancing other indebtedness. At our election, revolving loans under the senior credit facility bore interest at annual rates equal to either (a) LIBOR for 1, 2 or 3 month periods, as selected by us, plus an applicable margin of either 2.00% or 2.25%, or (b) the higher of the prime rate, the Federal Funds rate plus 0.5%, or a daily LIBOR rate, plus an applicable margin of either 1.00% or 1.50%. The applicable margin was determined based on availability under the senior credit facility with margins increasing as availability decreases. We also paid an unused line fee on the average amount by which the aggregate commitments exceed utilization of the senior credit facility equal to 0.375% per annum. The senior credit facility included certain affirmative and negative covenants that imposed restrictions on our financial and business operations, including limitations on debt, liens, investments, fundamental changes in our business, asset dispositions, dividends and other similar restricted payments, transactions with affiliates, payments and modifications of certain existing debt, future negative pledges, and changes in the nature of our business. We were also required to maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.1 to 1.0 during any period that borrowing availability was less than $10.0 million. Amended Senior Credit Facility. As amended, our senior credit facility ("amended senior credit facility") provides for a maximum of $130.0 million of revolving credit, subject to borrowing base availability. The borrowing base is currently equal to specified percentages of our eligible accounts receivable, inventories, fixed assets and real property less reserves established, from time to time, by the administrative agent under the facility. In addition, the term of the facility was extended to August 1, 2018. At our election, revolving loans under the amended senior credit facility bear interest at annual rates equal to either (a) LIBOR for 1, 2 or 3 month periods, as selected by us, plus an applicable margin of either 1.50%, 1.75% or 2.00%, or (b) the higher of the prime rate, the Federal Funds rate plus 0.5%, or a daily LIBOR rate plus 1.00%, plus an applicable margin of either 0.50%, 0.75% or 1.00%. The applicable margin is determined based on availability under the amended senior credit facility with margins increasing as availability decreases. We continue to pay an unused line fee on the average amount by which the aggregate commitments exceed utilization of the senior credit facility equal to 0.375% per annum. 20 The amended senior credit facility continues to include certain affirmative and negative covenants that impose restrictions on our financial and business operations. The amended senior credit facility requires that we maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.1 to 1.0 during any period that borrowing availability is less than $14.4 million. At December 28, 2013, we were in compliance with the amended senior credit facility's covenants. Average Interest Rates and Availability. The weighted-average interest rate on borrowings outstanding under the amended senior credit facility was 2.66% at December 28, 2013 and 3.59% at December 29, 2012. As of December 28, 2013, the unused borrowing availability under the amended senior credit facility was $32.6 million. Mortgage Note Payable. On April 1, 2013, we terminated our five-year $11.1 million mortgage loan which had a balance of $9.8 million. The mortgage loan was secured by our Susan Street real estate and liens secondary to the senior credit facility. The mortgage loan was scheduled to mature on September 13, 2016. Prior to the termination, the mortgage loan bore interest at a variable rate equal to one month LIBOR plus 3.00% and was payable in equal monthly installments of principal of $61 thousand, plus interest calculated on the declining balance of the mortgage loan, with a final payment of $7.4 million due on maturity. Obligation to Development Authority of Gordon County. On November 2, 2012, we signed a 6% seller-financed note of $5.5 million with Lineage PCR, Inc. (“Lineage”) related to the acquisition of the continuous carpet dyeing facility in Calhoun, Georgia. Effective December 28, 2012 through a series of agreements between us, the Development Authority of Gordon County, Georgia (the “Authority”) and Lineage, obligations with identical payment terms as the original note to Lineage are now payment obligations to the Authority. These transactions were consummated in order to provide us with a tax abatement to the related real estate and equipment at this facility. The tax abatement plan provides for abatement for certain components of the real and personal property taxes for up to ten years. At any time, we have the option to pay off the obligation, plus a nominal amount. The debt to the Authority bears interest at 6% and is payable in equal monthly installments of principal and interest of $106 thousand over 57 months. Deferred Financing Costs and Refinancing Expenses. In connection with the amendments in 2013 and 2012, we incurred additional financing costs of $351 thousand and $28 thousand, respectively, that are being amortized over the remaining term of the facility. In addition, we incurred $37 thousand of financing costs related to an equipment note payable. Additionally in 2013, we recognized $94 thousand of refinancing expenses related to the write-off of previously deferred financing costs related to our mortgage note payable. During 2012, we incurred $187 thousand in financing costs related to the obligations to the Authority that is being amortized over the term of the obligation. As a result of the refinancing in 2011, we paid $1.4 million in financing cost that is being amortized over the term of the senior credit facility and the mortgage loan. Additionally in 2011, we recognized $317 thousand of refinancing expenses of which $92 thousand related to the write-off of previously deferred financing costs and $225 thousand related to fees paid to third parties in connection with the new senior credit facility and mortgage loan. Equipment Notes Payable. Our equipment financing notes have terms ranging from four to seven years, are secured by the specific equipment financed, bear interest ranging from 1.00% to 7.72% and are due in monthly installments of principal and interest ranging from $2 thousand to $49 thousand through June 2020. The notes do not contain financial covenants. Capital Lease Obligations. Our capital lease obligations have terms ranging from four to seven years, are secured by the specific equipment leased, bear interest ranging from 2.90% to 7.72% and are due in monthly installments of principal and interest ranging from $2 thousand to $32 thousand through November 2018. Interest Payments. Interest payments for continuing operations were $3.1 million in 2013, $2.8 million in 2012 and $3.3 million in 2011. Stock-Based Awards. We recognize compensation expense related to share-based stock awards based on the fair value of the equity instrument over the period of vesting for the individual stock awards that were granted. At December 28, 2013, the total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested restricted stock awards was $1.3 million with a weighted-average vesting period of 4.2 years and unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock options was $18 thousand with a weighted-average vesting period of 0.9 years. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. We have no off-balance sheet arrangements at December 28, 2013 or December 29, 2012. Income Tax Considerations. During 2013, our tax benefit of $643 thousand included $1.2 million related to the reversal of previously established reserves for state income tax loss and tax credit carryforwards. The reversal of the reserves was based on a number of factors including current and future earnings assumptions by taxing jurisdiction. Additionally, 2013 included certain tax credits of approximately $520 thousand related to the years of 2009 - 2011 determined to be available for utilization and $304 thousand of 2012 research and development tax credits that could not be recognized until the extension of the credit was approved by Congress in 2013. During 2014, we anticipate cash outlays for income taxes to be relatively equivalent to our provision for income taxes unless it is determined that additional state valuation allowances should be reversed in which case our provision would be expected to be lower than cash outlays to the extent of the reversal of such valuation allowances. For 2015 and 2016, we expect our cash outlay for taxes to exceed our tax provision based on the anticipated differences between the book basis and tax basis of long- 21 lived, depreciable assets. Such differences could be in the range of $2.0 million in each of the periods, although there are many factors that could alter the actual experience. At December 28, 2013, we were in a net deferred tax asset position of $2.6 million. We performed an analysis, including an evaluation of certain tax planning strategies available to us, related to the net deferred tax asset and believe that the net deferred tax asset is recoverable in future periods. Approximately $6.8 million of future taxable income would be required to realize the deferred tax asset. During the first quarter of 2012, we paid approximately $1.3 million representing a settlement reached with the Internal Revenue Service for an audit for the tax years of 2004 through 2009. The settlement is related to temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets for financial reporting purposes and the tax basis of those assets; accordingly the settlement resulted in an increase in deferred taxes and had no significant impact on tax expense. Discontinued Operations - Environmental Contingencies. We have reserves for environmental obligations established at five previously owned sites that were associated with our discontinued textile businesses. Each site has a Corrective Action Plan (“CAP”) with the applicable authoritative state regulatory body responsible for oversight for environmental compliance. The CAP for four of these sites involves natural attenuation (degradation of the contaminants through naturally occurring events) over periods estimated at 10 to 20 years and the CAP on the remaining site involves a pump and treat remediation process, estimated to occur over a period of 25 years. Additionally, we have a reserve for an environmental liability on the property of a facility and related business that was sold in 2004. The CAP has a specified remaining remediation term estimated to be 4 years subsequent to 2013. The total costs for remediation for all of these sites during 2013 were $83 thousand, all of which related to normal ongoing remediation costs. We expect normal remediation costs to range from approximately $80 thousand to $100 thousand annually. We have a reserve of $1.8 million for environmental liabilities at these sites as of December 28, 2013. The liability established represents our best estimate of loss and is the reasonable amount to which there is any meaningful degree of certainty given the periods of estimated remediation and the dollars applicable to such remediation for those periods. The actual timeline to remediate, and thus, the ultimate cost to complete such remediation through these remediation efforts, may differ significantly from our estimates. Pre-tax costs for environmental remediation obligations classified as discontinued operations were primarily a result of specific events requiring action and additional expense in each period. Fair Value of Financial Instruments. At December 28, 2013, we had $2.8 million of liabilities measured at fair value that fall under a level 3 classification in the hierarchy (those subject to significant management judgment or estimation). Certain Related Party Transactions. During 2013, we purchased a portion of our requirements for polyester fiber from Engineered Floors, an entity controlled by Robert E. Shaw. Mr. Shaw reported holding approximately 10% of our Common Stock, which as of year-end represented approximately 4% of the total vote of all classes of our Common Stock. Engineered Floors is our principal supplier of polyester fiber and polyester broadloom carpet. Total purchases from Engineered Floors for 2013 and 2012 were approximately $12 million and $8 million, respectively; or approximately 8% of our external yarn and carpet purchases in 2013 and 2012. Purchases from Engineered Floors are based on market value, negotiated prices. We have no contractual arrangements or commitments with Mr. Shaw associated with our business relationship with Engineered Floors. Transactions with Engineered Floors were reviewed and approved by our board of directors. During 2013, we entered into a 10-year lease with the Rothman Family Partnership to lease a manufacturing facility as part of the Robertex acquisition. The Rothman Family Partnership includes Robert P. Rothman who is an associate of the Company. Rent paid to the Rothman Family Partnership during 2013 was $127 thousand. The lease was based on current market values for similar facilities. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. ASU 2013-02 requires us to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. In addition, we are required to present significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income. ASU 2013-02 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2012. Since the new standard did not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in the financial statements, the adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements. In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11, “Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities.” The amendments in this ASU require an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. An entity is required to apply the amendments for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. An entity should provide the disclosures required by those amendments retrospectively for all comparative periods presented. In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, "Balance Sheet (Topic 210)—Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities". The ASU clarifies that ordinary trade receivables and payables are not in the scope of ASU No. 2011-11. ASU No. 2011-11 applies only to derivatives, repurchase agreements and reverse purchase agreements, and securities borrowing and securities lending transactions that are either offset in accordance with specific criteria contained in the Codification or subject to a master netting arrangement or similar agreement. The effective date 22 is the same as the effective date of ASU 2011-11. We do not expect that the adoption of these ASUs will have a material effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements. In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU No. 2012-02, "Intangibles--Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment." This ASU states that an entity has the option first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events and circumstances indicates that it is more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. If, after assessing the totality of events and circumstances, an entity concludes that it is not more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired, then the entity is not required to take further action. However, if an entity concludes otherwise, then it is required to determine the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset and perform the quantitative impairment test by comparing the fair value with the carrying amount in accordance with Codification Subtopic 350-30, "Intangibles--Goodwill and Other, General Intangibles Other than Goodwill." Under the guidance in this ASU, an entity also has the option to bypass the qualitative assessment for any indefinite-lived intangible asset in any period and proceed directly to performing the quantitative impairment test. An entity will be able to resume performing the qualitative assessment in any subsequent period. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. The adoption of this ASU did not have a a material effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements. In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-04, "Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date". This ASU provides guidance for the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation within the scope of this guidance is fixed at the reporting date, except for obligations addressed within existing guidance in GAAP. For public entities, the ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. The ASU shall be applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented for those obligations within the scope of this Subtopic that exist at the beginning of an entity's fiscal year of adoption. Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect that the adoption of this ASU will have a material effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements. In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-10, "Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) - Inclusion of the Fed Funds Effective Swap Rate (or Overnight Index Swap Rate) as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes". This ASU allows the use of the Fed Funds Effective Swap Rate (or Overnight Index Swap Rate) as a benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting purposes in addition to interest rates on direct Treasury obligations of the United States government and LIBOR. In addition, the ASU removes the restriction on using different benchmark rates for similar hedges. The ASU became effective on a prospective basis for qualifying new or redesignated hedging relationships entered into on or after July 17, 2013. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements. In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11, "Income Taxes (Topic 740) - Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists". This ASU requires an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, to be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, except to the extent that a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and not combined with deferred tax assets. This ASU is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2013, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect that the adoption of this ASU will have a material effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements. CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES Certain estimates and assumptions are made when preparing our financial statements. Estimates involve judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic factors that are difficult to predict. As a result, actual amounts could differ from estimates made when our financial statements are prepared. The Securities and Exchange Commission requires management to identify its most critical accounting policies, defined as those that are both most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and operating results and the application of which requires our most difficult, subjective, and complex judgments. Although our estimates have not differed materially from our experience, such estimates pertain to inherently uncertain matters that could result in material differences in subsequent periods. We believe application of the following accounting policies require significant judgments and estimates and represent our critical accounting policies. Other significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements. • Revenue recognition. Revenues, including shipping and handling amounts, are recognized when the following criteria are met: there is persuasive evidence that a sales agreement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and collection is reasonably assured. Delivery is considered to have occurred when the customer takes title to products, which is generally on the date of shipment. At the time revenue is recognized, we record a provision for the estimated amount of future returns based primarily on historical experience and any known trends or conditions. 23 • Accounts receivable allowances. We provide allowances for expected cash discounts and doubtful accounts based upon historical experience and periodic evaluations of the financial condition of our customers. If the financial conditions of our customers were to significantly deteriorate, or other factors impair their ability to pay their debts, credit losses could differ from allowances recorded in our Consolidated Financial Statements. • Customer claims and product warranties. We provide product warranties related to manufacturing defects and specific performance standards for our products. We record reserves for the estimated costs of defective products and failure to meet applicable performance standards. The levels of reserves are established based primarily upon historical experience and our evaluation of pending claims. Because our evaluations are based on historical experience and conditions at the time our financial statements are prepared, actual results could differ from the reserves in our Consolidated Financial Statements. • Inventories. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the last-in, first-out method (LIFO), which generally matches current costs of inventory sold with current revenues, for substantially all inventories. Reserves are also established to adjust inventories that are off-quality, aged or obsolete to their estimated net realizable value. Additionally, rates of recoverability per unit of off-quality, aged or obsolete inventory are estimated based on historical rates of recoverability and other known conditions or circumstances that may affect future recoverability. Actual results could differ from assumptions used to value our inventory. • Goodwill. Goodwill is tested annually for impairment during the fourth quarter or earlier if significant events or substantive changes in circumstances occur that may indicate that goodwill may net be recoverable. The goodwill impairment tests are based on determining the fair value of the specified reporting units based on management judgments and assumptions using the discounted cash flows. The valuation approaches are subject to key judgments and assumptions that are sensitive to change such as judgments and assumptions about sales growth rates, operating margins and the weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”). When developing these key judgments and assumptions, we consider economic, operational and market conditions that could impact the fair value of the reporting unit. However, estimates are inherently uncertain and represent only management’s reasonable expectations regarding future developments. These estimates and the judgments and assumptions upon which the estimates are based will, in all likelihood, differ in some respects from actual future results. Should a significant or prolonged deterioration in economic conditions occur key judgments and assumptions could be impacted. • Contingent Consideration. Contingent consideration liabilities represent future amounts we may be required to pay in conjunction with various business combinations. The ultimate amount of future payments is based on sales levels for one contingent liability and incremental gross margin growth related to another contingent liability. We estimate the fair value of the contingent consideration liability related to sales levels by forecasting estimated cash payments based on projected sales and discounting the cash payment to its present value using a risk-adjusted rate of return. We estimate the fair value of the contingent consideration liability associated with incremental gross margin growth by employing Monte Carlo simulations to estimate the volatility and systematic relative risk of gross margin levels and discounting the associated cash payment amounts to their present values using a credit-risk-adjusted interest rate. We evaluate our estimates of the fair value of contingent consideration liabilities on a periodic basis. Any changes in the fair value of contingent consideration liabilities are recorded through earnings. The total estimated fair value of contingent consideration liabilities was $2.8 million and $1.9 million at December 28, 2013 and December 29, 2012, respectively, and was included in accrued expenses and other liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets. • Self-insured accruals. We estimate costs required to settle claims related to our self-insured medical, dental and workers' compensation plans. These estimates include costs to settle known claims, as well as incurred and unreported claims. The estimated costs of known and unreported claims are based on historical experience. Actual results could differ from assumptions used to estimate these accruals. • Income taxes. The Company’s effective tax rate is based on its income, statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available in the jurisdictions in which it operates. Tax laws are complex and subject to different interpretations by the taxpayer and respective governmental taxing authorities. Deferred tax assets represent amounts available to reduce income taxes payable on taxable income in a future period. The Company evaluates the recoverability of these future tax benefits by assessing the adequacy of future expected taxable income from all sources, including reversal of taxable temporary differences, forecasted operating earnings and available tax planning strategies. These sources of income inherently rely on estimates, including business forecasts and other projections of financial results over an extended period of time. In the event that the Company is not able to realize all or a portion of its deferred tax assets in the future, a valuation allowance is provided. The Company would recognize such amounts through a charge to income in the period in which that determination is made or when tax law changes are enacted. The Company had valuation allowances of $3.7 million at December 28, 2013 and $4.9 million at December 29, 2012. For further information regarding the Company’s valuation allowances, see Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements. 24 • Loss contingencies. We routinely assess our exposure related to legal matters, environmental matters, product liabilities or any other claims against our assets that may arise in the normal course of business. If we determine that it is probable a loss has been incurred, the amount of the loss, or an amount within the range of loss, that can be reasonably estimated will be recorded. Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK (Dollars in thousands) Our earnings, cash flows and financial position are exposed to market risks relating to interest rates, among other factors. It is our policy to minimize our exposure to adverse changes in interest rates and manage interest rate risks inherent in funding our Company with debt. We address this financial exposure through a risk management program that includes maintaining a mix of fixed and floating rate debt and the use of interest rate swap agreements (See Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). At December 28, 2013, $60,274, or approximately 56% of our total debt, was subject to floating interest rates. A 10% fluctuation in the variable interest rates applicable to this floating rate debt would have an annual after-tax impact of approximately $81. Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA The supplementary financial information required by ITEM 302 of Regulation S-K is included in PART II, ITEM 5 of this report and the Financial Statements are included in a separate section of this report. Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE On November 11, 2013, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors confirmed its engagement of Ernst & Young LLP (“E&Y”) to audit the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ending December 28, 2013, and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 28, 2013. Upon completion of all procedures related to filing the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2013, the engagement of E&Y will end. At that time, the Committee approved the engagement of Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP to serve as independent registered public accountants for the Company for fiscal 2014. During the fiscal years ended December 28, 2013 and December 29, 2012, Ernst & Young's reports on the Registrant's financial statements did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. During the fiscal years ended December 28, 2013 and December 29, 2012 and the subsequent periods through the date of this report, (i) there were no disagreements between the Registrant and Ernst & Young on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Ernst & Young, would have caused Ernst & Young to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with its reports on the Registrant's financial statements, and (ii) there were no reportable events as that term is described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K. During the two most recent fiscal years and through the date of this report, neither the Registrant nor anyone on its behalf consulted with Dixon Hughes Goodman regarding any of the following: (i) The application of accounting principles to a specific transaction, either completed or proposed; (ii) The type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Registrant's financial statements, and none of the following was provided to the Registrant: (a) a written report; or (b) oral advice that Dixon Hughes Goodman concluded was an important factor considered by the Registrant in reaching a decision as to an accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or (iii) Any matter that was subject of a disagreement, as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K, or a reportable event, as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K. 25 Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES (a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. We maintain disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the commission's rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such terms are defined in Rules 13(a)-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e)) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) as of December 28, 2013, the date of the financial statements included in this Form 10-K (the “Evaluation Date”). Based on that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the Evaluation Date. (b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. During the last fiscal quarter, there have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting. Our management report on internal control over financial reporting and the report of our independent registered public accounting firm on our internal control over financial reporting are contained in Item 15(a)(1) of this report. Item 9B. OTHER INFORMATION None. 26 PART III. Item 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE The sections entitled "Information about Nominees for Director" and "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" in the Proxy Statement of the registrant for the annual meeting of shareholders to be held April 29, 2014 is incorporated herein by reference. Information regarding the executive officers of the registrant is presented in PART I of this report. We adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the "Code of Ethics") which applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer or controller, and any persons performing similar functions. A copy of the Code of Ethics is incorporated by reference herein as Exhibit 14 to this report. Audit Committee Financial Expert The Board has determined that John W. Murrey, III is an audit committee financial expert as defined by Item 407 (e)(5) of Regulation S-K of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is independent within the meaning of the applicable Securities and Exchange Commission rules and NASDAQ standards. For a brief listing of Mr. Murrey's relevant experience, please refer to the "Election of Directors" section of the Company's Proxy Statement. Audit Committee We have a standing audit committee. At December 28, 2013, members of our audit committee are John W. Murrey, III, Chairman, Charles E. Brock, J. Don Brock, Walter W. Hubbard, Lowry F. Kline, Hilda W. Murray and Michael L. Owens. Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION The sections entitled "Compensation Discussion and Analysis", "Executive Compensation Information" and "Director Compensation" in the Proxy Statement of the registrant for the annual meeting of shareholders to be held April 29, 2014 are incorporated herein by reference. Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS The section entitled "Principal Shareholders", as well as the the beneficial ownership table (and accompanying notes), in the Proxy Statement of the registrant for the annual meeting of shareholders to be held April 29, 2014 is incorporated herein by reference. Equity Compensation Plan Information as of December 28, 2013 The following table sets forth information as to our equity compensation plans as of the end of the 2013 fiscal year: Plan Category (a) Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of the outstanding options, warrants and rights (b) Weighted- average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (c) Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a) Equity Compensation Plans approved by security holders 759,995 (1) $ 10.64 (2) 622,819 (1) Does not include 525,799 shares issued but unvested Common Stock pursuant to restricted stock grants under our 2006 Stock Awards (2) Plan, with a weighted-average grant date value of $6.64 per share. Includes the aggregate weighted-average of (i) the exercise price per share for outstanding options to purchase 555,105 shares of Common Stock under our 2000 Stock Incentive Plan and 105,250 shares of Common Stock under our 2006 Stock Awards Plan and (ii) the price per share of the Common Stock on the grant date for each of 99,640 Performance Units issued under the Directors' Stock Plan (each unit equivalent to one share of Common Stock). Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE The section entitled "Certain Transactions Between the Company and Directors and Officers" in the Proxy Statement of the registrant for the annual meeting of shareholders to be held April 29, 2014 is incorporated herein by reference. Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES The section entitled "Audit Fees Discussion" in the Proxy Statement of the Registrant for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held April 29, 2014 is incorporated herein by reference. 27 Item 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES. PART IV. (a) (1) The response to this portion of Item 15 is submitted as a separate section of this report. (2) No financial statements required. (3) Please refer to the Exhibit Index which is attached hereto. (b) Exhibits - The response to this portion of Item 15 is submitted as a separate section of this report. See Item 15(a) (3) above. 28 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. Date: March 12, 2014 The Dixie Group, Inc. /s/ DANIEL K. FRIERSON By: Daniel K. Frierson Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. Signature Capacity Date /s/ DANIEL K. FRIERSON Chairman of the Board, Director and Chief Executive Officer March 12, 2014 Daniel K. Frierson /s/ JON A. FAULKNER Vice President, Chief Financial Officer March 12, 2014 Jon A. Faulkner /s/ D. KENNEDY FRIERSON, JR. Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Director March 12, 2014 D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr. /s/ D. EUGENE LASATER Controller D. Eugene Lasater /s/ CHARLES E. BROCK Director Charles E. Brock /s/ J. DON BROCK J. Don Brock Director /s/ WALTER W. HUBBARD Director Walter W. Hubbard /s/ LOWRY F. KLINE Lowry F. Kline Director /s/ HILDA S. MURRAY Director Hilda S. Murray /s/ JOHN W. MURREY, III Director John W. Murrey, III /s/ MICHAEL L. OWENS Director Michael L. Owens 29 March 12, 2014 March 12, 2014 March 12, 2014 March 12, 2014 March 12, 2014 March 12, 2014 March 12, 2014 March 12, 2014 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K ITEM 8 AND ITEM 15(a)(1) LIST OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FINANCIAL STATEMENTS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 28, 2013 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE 30 FORM 10-K - ITEM 8 and ITEM 15(a)(1) THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES LIST OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The following consolidated financial statements of The Dixie Group, Inc. and subsidiaries are included in Item 8 and Item 15(a)(1): Table of Contents Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting Reports of independent registered public accounting firm Consolidated balance sheets - December 28, 2013 and December 29, 2012 Consolidated statements of operations - Years ended December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012, and December 31, 2011 Consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) - Years ended December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012, and December 31, 2011 Consolidated statements of cash flows - Years ended December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012, and December 31, 2011 Consolidated statements of stockholders' equity - Years ended December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012, and December 31, 2011 Notes to consolidated financial statements Page 32 33 35 36 37 38 40 41 31 MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives because of its inherent limitations. Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures, as well as diverse interpretation of U. S. generally accepted accounting principles by accounting professionals. It is also possible that internal control over financial reporting can be circumvented by collusion or improper management override. Because of such limitations, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. Furthermore, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. These inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process; therefore, while it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce such risk, it is not possible to eliminate all risk. Our internal control over financial reporting has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report on internal control over financial reporting as of December 28, 2013. Management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has used the criteria set forth in the report entitled “Internal Control - Integrated Framework” published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework) to evaluate the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting. Management has concluded that its internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 28, 2013, based on those criteria. Daniel K. Frierson Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer Jon A. Faulkner Chief Financial Officer 32 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors and Shareholders of The Dixie Group, Inc. We have audited The Dixie Group, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting as of December 28, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework) (the COSO criteria). The Dixie Group, Inc.'s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. In our opinion, The Dixie Group, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 28, 2013, based on the COSO criteria. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of The Dixie Group, Inc. as of December 28, 2013 and December 29, 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 28, 2013 of The Dixie Group, Inc. and our report dated March 12, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. /s/ Ernst & Young LLP Atlanta, Georgia March 12, 2014 33 The Board of Directors and Shareholders of The Dixie Group, Inc. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of The Dixie Group, Inc. as of December 28, 2013 and December 29, 2012, and the related consolidated statements of statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 28, 2013. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of The Dixie Group, Inc. at December 28, 2013 and December 29, 2012, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 28, 2013, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), The Dixie Group, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting as of December 28, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework) and our report dated March 12, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. /s/ Ernst & Young LLP Atlanta, Georgia March 12, 2014 34 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (dollars in thousands, except share data) ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents Receivables, net Inventories Deferred income taxes Other current assets TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET OTHER ASSETS TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY CURRENT LIABILITIES Accounts payable Accrued expenses Current portion of long-term debt TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES LONG-TERM DEBT DEFERRED INCOME TAXES OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES TOTAL LIABILITIES December 28, 2013 December 29, 2012 $ 255 $ 44,063 93,667 6,622 5,182 149,789 74,485 24,592 491 32,469 72,245 5,615 4,235 115,055 69,483 17,232 $ $ 248,866 $ 201,770 $ 21,679 26,202 6,229 54,110 101,759 4,072 18,154 178,095 14,891 19,147 4,059 38,097 80,166 3,824 15,637 137,724 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (See Note 17) STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Common Stock ($3 par value per share): Authorized 80,000,000 shares, issued and outstanding - 12,441,356 shares for 2013 and 12,173,961 shares for 2012 37,324 36,522 Class B Common Stock ($3 par value per share): Authorized 16,000,000 shares, issued and outstanding - 870,287 shares for 2013 and 952,784 shares for 2012 Additional paid-in capital Accumulated deficit Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 2,611 137,170 (106,550) 216 70,771 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $ 248,866 $ 2,858 136,744 (111,840) (238) 64,046 201,770 See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements. 35 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (dollars in thousands, except per share data) December 28, 2013 Year Ended December 29, 2012 December 31, 2011 NET SALES Cost of sales GROSS PROFIT Selling and administrative expenses Other operating (income) expense, net Facility consolidation and severance expenses, net OPERATING INCOME Interest expense Other (income) expense, net Refinancing expenses INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE TAXES Income tax provision (benefit) INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax NET INCOME (LOSS) BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE: Continuing operations Discontinued operations Net income (loss) BASIC SHARES OUTSTANDING DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE: Continuing operations Discontinued operations Net income (loss) DILUTED SHARES OUTSTANDING DIVIDENDS PER SHARE: Common Stock Class B Common Stock See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements. $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 345,066 259,427 85,639 $ 266,372 201,000 65,372 270,110 204,604 65,506 76,554 494 — 8,591 3,756 26 94 4,715 (643) 5,358 (68) 5,290 0.40 (0.01) 0.39 12,737 0.40 (0.01) 0.39 $ $ $ $ $ 63,489 68 — 1,815 3,146 (277) — (1,054) (401) (653) (274) (927) (0.05) (0.02) (0.07) 12,638 (0.05) (0.02) (0.07) $ $ $ $ $ 60,667 (266) (563) 5,668 3,470 (75) 317 1,956 684 1,272 (286) 986 0.10 (0.02) 0.08 12,585 0.10 (0.02) 0.08 12,852 12,638 12,623 — $ — — $ — — — 36 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (dollars in thousands) NET INCOME (LOSS) OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF TAX: Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps Reclassification of loss into earnings from interest rate swaps Amortization of unrealized loss on dedesignated interest rate swaps Unrecognized net actuarial gain on postretirement benefit plans Reclassification of net actuarial gain into earnings from postretirement benefit plans Reclassification of prior service credits into earnings from postretirement benefit plans TOTAL OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF TAX December 28, 2013 Year Ended December 29, 2012 December 31, 2011 $ 5,290 $ (927) $ 986 236 176 98 20 (22) (54) 454 (476) 98 289 20 (27) (54) (150) (412) 268 93 67 (18) (55) (57) COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) $ 5,744 $ (1,077) $ 929 See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements. 37 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (dollars in thousands) December 28, 2013 Year Ended December 29, 2012 December 31, 2011 CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES Income (loss) from continuing operations Loss from discontinued operations Net income (loss) Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities, net of acquisitions: Depreciation and amortization Provision (benefit) for deferred income taxes Net (gain) loss on property, plant and equipment disposals Stock-based compensation expense Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation Write-off of deferred financing costs Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Receivables Inventories Other current assets Accounts payable and accrued expenses Other operating assets and liabilities NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES Net proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment Purchase of property, plant and equipment Net cash paid in business acquisitions NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES Net payments on previous credit line Payments on previous term loan Net borrowings on current credit line Borrowings on current mortgage note payable Payments on current mortgage note payable Payments on previous mortgage note payable Payments on note payable related to acquisition Borrowings on equipment financing Payments on equipment financing Payments on capitalized leases Borrowings on notes payable Payments on notes payable Payments on subordinated indebtedness Change in outstanding checks in excess of cash Proceeds from stock option exercises Repurchases of Common Stock Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation Payments for debt issuance costs NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES $ 5,358 $ (68) 5,290 10,262 (1,037) 195 847 (151) 94 (11,479) (19,283) (878) 11,642 (1,423) (5,921) 48 (11,438) (2,170) (13,560) — — 25,152 — (10,141) — (852) 4,312 (1,212) (688) 2,429 (851) — 1,350 190 (207) 151 (388) 19,245 $ (653) (274) (927) 9,396 (643) (186) 937 — — (3,296) (8,115) (2,506) 1,455 (827) (4,712) 187 (3,386) (1,197) (4,396) — — 7,316 — (737) — (161) 5,003 (1,293) (204) 795 (746) — (205) — (199) — (268) 9,301 (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD $ (236) 491 255 $ 193 298 491 $ 38 1,272 (286) 986 9,649 (254) 37 663 — 92 2,204 (5,650) (313) (1,724) (636) 5,054 5 (6,740) — (6,735) (30,503) (11,324) 52,806 11,063 (185) (5,736) — 1,794 (2,660) (360) 733 (609) (12,162) 366 — (131) — (1,357) 1,735 54 244 298 SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Equipment purchased under capital leases Fair value of assets acquired in acquisitions Liabilities assumed in acquisitions Note payable related to acquisition Accrued consideration related to acquisition See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements. $ 1,865 8,062 (836) (3,749) (1,307) $ 666 $ 9,184 (42) (5,500) (2,445) 14 — — — — 39 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (dollars in thousands) Balance at December 25, 2010 $ 35,926 $ 2,603 $ 135,831 $ (111,899) $ (31) $ 62,430 Common Stock Class B Common Stock Additional Paid-In Capital Accumulated Deficit Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Total Stockholders' Equity Repurchases of Common Stock - 29,069 shares Restricted stock grants issued - 91,340 shares Class B converted into Common Stock - 6,197 shares Stock-based compensation expense Reclassification of deferred compensation on Directors' stock Net income Other comprehensive loss (87) 211 18 — — — — — 63 (18) — — — — (44) (274) — 663 494 — — — — — — — 986 — Balance at December 31, 2011 36,068 2,648 136,670 (110,913) Repurchases of Common Stock - 50,444 shares Restricted stock grants issued - 289,233 shares Restricted stock grants forfeited - 17,229 shares Class B converted into Common Stock - 15,925 shares Stock-based compensation expense Net loss Other comprehensive loss (151) 609 (52) 48 — — — — 258 — (48) — — — (48) (867) 52 — 937 — — — — — — — (927) — Balance at December 29, 2012 36,522 2,858 136,744 (111,840) Common Stock issued - 50,464 shares Repurchases of Common Stock - 38,815 shares Restricted stock grants issued - 173,249 shares Class B converted into Common Stock - 140,477 shares Stock-based compensation expense Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation Net income Other comprehensive income 151 (116) 346 421 — — — — — — 39 (91) 174 (520) (421) — — — — — 847 151 — — — — — — — — 5,290 — Balance at December 28, 2013 $ 37,324 $ 2,611 $ 137,170 $ (106,550) $ See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements. — — — — — — (57) (88) — — — — — — (150) (238) — — — — — — — 454 216 (131) — — 663 494 986 (57) 64,385 (199) — — — 937 (927) (150) 64,046 190 (207) — — 847 151 5,290 454 $ 70,771 40 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share data) NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Business The Company's businesses consists principally of marketing, manufacturing and selling finished carpet and rugs. The Company has one reportable segment, carpet and rug manufacturing. The Company sells carpet and rug products in both residential and commercial applications. Additionally, the Company provides manufacturing support to its carpet businesses through its separate processing operations. Principles of Consolidation The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of The Dixie Group, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the "Company"). Significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates and these differences could be material. Fiscal Year The Company ends its fiscal year on the last Saturday of December. All references herein to "2013," "2012," and "2011," mean the fiscal years ended December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012, and December 31, 2011, respectively. The year 2011 contained 53 weeks, all other years presented contained 52 weeks. Reclassifications The Company reclassified certain amounts in 2012 and 2011 to conform to the 2013 presentation. Discontinued Operations The financial statements separately report discontinued operations and the results of continuing operations (See Note 20). Disclosures included herein pertain to the Company's continuing operations unless noted otherwise. Cash and Cash Equivalents Highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less when purchased are reported as cash equivalents. Market Risk The Company sells carpet to floorcovering retailers, the interior design, architectural and specifier communities and supplies carpet yarn and carpet dyeing and finishing services to certain manufacturers. The Company's customers are located principally throughout the United States. One customer accounted for, as a percentage of net sales, approximately 13% in 2013, 9% in 2012 and 12% in 2011. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of net sales in 2013, 2012 or 2011, nor did the Company make a significant amount of sales to foreign countries during 2013, 2012 or 2011. Credit Risk The Company grants credit to its customers with defined payment terms, performs ongoing evaluations of the credit worthiness of its customers and generally does not require collateral. Accounts receivable are carried at their outstanding principal amounts, less an anticipated amount for discounts and an allowance for doubtful accounts, which management believes is sufficient to cover potential credit losses based on historical experience and periodic evaluation of the financial condition of the Company's customers. Notes receivable are carried at their outstanding principal amounts, less an allowance for doubtful accounts to cover potential credit losses based on the financial condition of borrowers and collateral held by the Company. Inventories Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method, which generally matches current costs of inventory sold with current revenues, for substantially all inventories. 41 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant and equipment is stated at the lower of cost or impaired value. Provisions for depreciation and amortization of property, plant and equipment have been computed for financial reporting purposes using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, ranging from 10 to 40 years for buildings and improvements, and 3 to 10 years for machinery and equipment. Costs to repair and maintain the Company's equipment and facilities are expensed as incurred. Such costs typically include expenditures to maintain equipment and facilities in good repair and proper working condition. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment when circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be fully recoverable. When the carrying value of the asset exceeds the value of its estimated undiscounted future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized equal to the difference between the asset's carrying value and its fair value. Fair value is estimated using discounted cash flows, prices for similar assets or other valuation techniques. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over the fair market value of identified net assets acquired in business combinations. The Company's goodwill is tested for impairment annually in the fourth quarter of each year or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of goodwill associated with a reporting unit may not be fully recoverable. The first step in the goodwill assessment process is to identify potential goodwill impairments and involves a comparison of the carrying value of a reporting unit, including goodwill, to the fair value of the reporting unit. The Company has identified its reporting units as its residential floorcovering business and commercial floorcovering business. For this purpose, the Company estimates fair value of the reporting unit based on expected current and future cash flows discounted at the Company's weighted-average cost of capital ("WACC"). Such an estimate necessarily involves judgments and assumptions concerning, among other matters, future sales and operating margins, as well as interest rates and other financial factors used to calculate the WACC. If an impairment is indicated in the first step of the assessment, a second step in the assessment is performed by comparing the "implied fair value" of the Company's reporting units' goodwill with the carrying value of the reporting units' goodwill. For this purpose, the "implied fair value" of goodwill for each reporting unit that has goodwill associated with its operations is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill is determined in a business combination. (See Note 6). Identifiable intangible assets with finite lives are generally amortized on a straight-line basis over their respective lives, which range from 10 to 20 years. Customer Claims and Product Warranties The Company generally provides product warranties related to manufacturing defects and specific performance standards for its products. At the time sales are recorded, the Company records reserves for the estimated costs of defective products and failure of its products to meet applicable performance standards. The level of reserves the Company establishes is based primarily upon historical experience, including the level of sales and evaluation of pending claims. Self-Insured Benefit Programs The Company records liabilities to reflect an estimate of the ultimate cost of claims related to its self-insured medical and dental benefits and workers' compensation. The amounts of such liabilities are based on an analysis of the Company's historical experience for each type of claim. Income Taxes The Company recognizes deferred income tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences of the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions, if any, in income tax expense. Derivative Financial Instruments The Company does not hold speculative financial instruments, nor does it hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes. The Company uses derivative instruments, currently interest rate swaps, to minimize interest rate volatility. 42 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) The Company recognizes all derivatives on its Consolidated Balance Sheet at fair value. Derivatives that are designated as cash flow hedges are linked to specific liabilities on the Company's balance sheet. The Company assesses, both at inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of the hedged items. When it is determined that a derivative is not highly effective or the derivative expires, is sold, terminated, or exercised, the Company discontinues hedge accounting for that specific hedge instrument. Changes in the fair value of effective cash flow hedges are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ("AOCIL") and reclassified to earnings in the same periods during which the hedge transaction affects earnings. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are not effective cash flow hedges are recognized in income. Treasury Stock The Company classifies treasury stock as a reduction to Common Stock for the par value of such shares acquired and the difference between the par value and the price paid for each share recorded either entirely to retained earnings or to additional paid-in-capital for periods in which the Company does not have retained earnings. This presentation reflects the repurchased shares as authorized but unissued as prescribed by state statute. Revenue Recognition Revenues, including shipping and handling amounts, are recognized when the following criteria are met: there is persuasive evidence that a sales agreement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. Delivery is not considered to have occurred until the customer takes title to the goods and assumes the risks and rewards of ownership, which is generally on the date of shipment. At the time revenue is recognized, the Company records a provision for the estimated amount of future returns based primarily on historical experience and any known trends or conditions that exist at the time revenue is recognized. Revenues are recorded net of taxes collected from customers. Advertising Costs and Vendor Consideration The Company engages in promotional and advertising programs that include rebates, discounts, points and cooperative advertising programs. Expenses relating to these programs are charged to earnings during the period of the related benefits. These arrangements do not require significant estimates of costs. Substantially all such expenses are recorded as a deduction from sales. The cost of cooperative advertising programs is recorded as selling and administrative expenses when the Company can identify a tangible benefit associated with the program, and can reasonably estimate that the fair value of the benefit is equal to or greater than its cost. The amount of advertising and promotion expenses included in selling and administrative expenses was not significant for the years 2013, 2012 or 2011. Cost of Sales Cost of sales includes all costs related to manufacturing the Company's products, including purchasing and receiving costs, inspection costs, warehousing costs, freight costs, internal transfer costs or other costs of the Company's distribution network. Selling and Administrative Expenses Selling and administrative expenses include all costs, not included in cost of sales, related to the sale and marketing of the Company's products and general administration of the Company's business. Operating Leases Rent is expensed over the lease period, including the effect of any rent holiday and rent escalation provisions, which effectively amortizes the rent holidays and rent escalations on a straight-line basis over the lease period. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of their economic lives or the lease term, excluding renewal options. Any leasehold improvement made by the Company and funded by the lessor is treated as a leasehold improvement and amortized over the shorter of its economic life or the lease term. Any funding provided by the lessor for such improvements is treated as deferred costs and amortized over the lease period. Stock-Based Compensation The Company recognizes compensation expense relating to share-based payments based on the fair value of the equity or liability instrument issued. Restricted stock grants with pro-rata vesting are expensed using the straight-line method. (Terms of the Company's awards are specified in Note 15). 43 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) Recent Accounting Pronouncements In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. ASU 2013-02 requires the Company to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. In addition, the Company is required to present significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income. ASU 2013-02 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2012. Since the new standard did not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in the financial statements, the adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11, “Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities.” The amendments in this ASU require an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. An entity is required to apply the amendments for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. An entity should provide the disclosures required by those amendments retrospectively for all comparative periods presented. In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, "Balance Sheet (Topic 210)—Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities". The ASU clarifies that ordinary trade receivables and payables are not in the scope of ASU No. 2011-11. ASU No. 2011-11 applies only to derivatives, repurchase agreements and reverse purchase agreements, and securities borrowing and securities lending transactions that are either offset in accordance with specific criteria contained in the Codification or subject to a master netting arrangement or similar agreement. The effective date is the same as the effective date of ASU 2011-11. The Company does not expect that the adoption of these ASUs will have a material effect on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU No. 2012-02, "Intangibles--Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment." This ASU states that an entity has the option first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events and circumstances indicates that it is more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. If, after assessing the totality of events and circumstances, an entity concludes that it is not more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired, then the entity is not required to take further action. However, if an entity concludes otherwise, then it is required to determine the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset and perform the quantitative impairment test by comparing the fair value with the carrying amount in accordance with Codification Subtopic 350-30, "Intangibles--Goodwill and Other, General Intangibles Other than Goodwill." Under the guidance in this ASU, an entity also has the option to bypass the qualitative assessment for any indefinite-lived intangible asset in any period and proceed directly to performing the quantitative impairment test. An entity will be able to resume performing the qualitative assessment in any subsequent period. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. The adoption of this ASU did not have a a material effect on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-04, "Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date". This ASU provides guidance for the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation within the scope of this guidance is fixed at the reporting date, except for obligations addressed within existing guidance in GAAP. For public entities, the ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. The ASU shall be applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented for those obligations within the scope of this Subtopic that exist at the beginning of an entity's fiscal year of adoption. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this ASU will have a material effect on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-10, "Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) - Inclusion of the Fed Funds Effective Swap Rate (or Overnight Index Swap Rate) as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes". This ASU allows the use of the Fed Funds Effective Swap Rate (or Overnight Index Swap Rate) as a benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting purposes in addition to interest rates on direct Treasury obligations of the United States government and LIBOR. In addition, the ASU removes the restriction on using different benchmark rates for similar hedges. The ASU became effective on a prospective basis for qualifying new or redesignated hedging relationships entered into on or after July 17, 2013. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11, "Income Taxes (Topic 740) - Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists". This ASU requires an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, to be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, except to the extent that a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and not combined with deferred tax assets. 44 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) This ASU is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2013, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this ASU will have a material effect on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. NOTE 2 - RECEIVABLES, NET Receivables are summarized as follows: Customers, trade Other receivables Gross receivables Less allowance for doubtful accounts Net receivables NOTE 3 - INVENTORIES Inventories are summarized as follows: Raw materials Work-in-process Finished goods Supplies, repair parts and other LIFO reserve Total inventories NOTE 4 - PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET Property, plant and equipment consists of the following: Land and improvements Buildings and improvement Machinery and equipment Accumulated depreciation Property, plant and equipment, net 2013 2012 $ $ 41,898 $ 2,306 44,204 (141) 44,063 $ 31,043 1,642 32,685 (216) 32,469 2013 2012 $ 31,864 $ 16,880 57,983 566 (13,626) $ 93,667 $ 23,002 13,786 49,251 470 (14,264) 72,245 2013 2012 $ 7,231 $ 50,627 149,040 206,898 6,950 50,293 137,432 194,675 (132,413) (125,192) $ 74,485 $ 69,483 Depreciation of property, plant and equipment, including amounts for capital leases, totaled $9,866 in 2013, $9,070 in 2012 and $9,417 in 2011. NOTE 5 - ACQUISITIONS 2013 Acquisition On June 30, 2013, the Company acquired Robertex Associates, Inc. ("Robertex") from Robert P. Rothman. The Company acquired all the outstanding shares of capital stock of Robertex for an aggregate purchase price of $7,334, which included cash, a seller-financed note and an accrued contingent liability. The seller-financed note consists of five annual payments of principal and interest. The accrued contingent liability is payable in five annual payments based upon incremental growth in gross margins of selected products for five years subsequent to the acquisition. The Company has incurred direct incremental costs of approximately $350 related to this acquisition. These incremental costs are classified in selling and administrative expenses in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations. This acquisition is designed to increase the Company's market share in the wool markets it currently serves. Robertex produces wool floorcovering products under its Robertex and Carousel brands. 45 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) The purchase price consideration was as follows: Cash paid Seller-financed note Contingent consideration Total purchase price $ $ 2,278 3,749 1,307 7,334 The acquisition has been accounted for as a business combination which requires, among other things, that assets acquired and liabilities assumed to be recognized at their fair values as of the acquisition date. The acquisition did not represent a material business combination. The following table summarizes the estimates of fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of June 30, 2013 based on the purchase price allocation. The components of the purchase price allocation consisted of the following: Cash Accounts receivable Inventory Other current assets Property, plant and equipment Definite-lived intangible assets Goodwill Accounts payable Accrued expenses Total purchase price 2012 Acquisitions $ $ 108 115 2,139 14 1,863 2,222 1,709 (643) (193) 7,334 On November 2, 2012, the Company acquired a continuous carpet dyeing facility ("Colormaster") in Calhoun, Georgia from Lineage PCR, Inc. for $6,562 which included cash, a seller financed note and the fair value of a five-year below market agreement to process certain of the seller's products on a commission basis. The Company incurred direct, incremental costs of $269 related to the acquisition which were expensed as incurred and included in general and administrative expenses in the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. With the acquisition of these continuous dyeing assets, the Company is moving a significant volume of its dyeing production from its more costly beck dyeing assets as well as develop future products that utilize the continuous dye process. The purchase price consideration was as follows: Cash paid Seller-financed note Below-market supply contract Total purchase price $ $ 239 5,500 823 6,562 The acquisition has been accounted for as a business combination which requires, among other things, that assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recognized at their fair values as of the acquisition date. The Company concluded that the acquisition did not represent a material business combination. The allocation of the purchase price was based on estimates of the fair value of the assets acquired as of November 2, 2012. The components of the purchase price allocation consisted of the following: Property, plant and equipment Inventory Supplies Purchase price 46 $ $ 6,371 173 18 6,562 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) On November 28, 2012, the Company acquired the specialized wool rug tufting equipment and related business ("Crown Rug") from Crown Manufacturing, Inc. for $2,580 which included cash, deferred payments and an accrued contingent liability. The deferred payment is payable in three equal annual installments and the accrued contingent liability is three annual payments based on sales volumes each year. The Company incurred direct incremental costs of $49 related to this acquisition and is classified in general and administrative expenses in the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. This acquisition was designed to move and utilize the acquired assets in the Company's facilities to meet internal requirements as well as to enter certain other markets not currently served by the Company. Prior to the acquisition of these assets from Crown Manufacturing, the Company's requirements for products comprised a significant portion of the related machinery capacity at Crown Manufacturing. The purchase price consideration was as follows: Cash paid Deferred payments to seller Contingent consideration Total purchase price $ $ 958 471 1,151 2,580 The acquisition has been accounted for as a business combination which requires, among other things, that assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recognized at their fair values as of the acquisition date. The Company concluded that the acquisition did not represent a material business combination. The allocation of the purchase price was based on estimates of the fair value of the assets acquired as of November 28, 2012. The components of the purchase price allocation consisted of the following: Property, plant and equipment Definite-lived intangible assets Goodwill Accrued payable Purchase price $ $ 590 352 1,680 (42) 2,580 NOTE 6 - GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS The changes in the carrying amounts of goodwill for the years ended 2013 and 2012 are as follows: Goodwill Accumulated Impairment Losses Net Balance at December 31, 2011 $ — $ — $ Additional goodwill recognized during the period (1) Impairment losses recognized during the period Other changes in the carrying amounts during the period Balance at December 29, 2012 Additional goodwill recognized during the period (2) Impairment losses recognized during the period Other changes in the carrying amounts during the period 1,680 — — 1,680 1,709 — — — — — — — — — — 1,680 — — 1,680 1,709 — — Balance at December 28, 2013 $ 3,389 $ — $ 3,389 (1) During 2012, the Company recorded goodwill related to the Crown Rug acquisition. (2) During 2013, the Company recorded goodwill related to the Robertex acquisition. 47 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) The following table represents the details of the Company's intangible assets for years ended 2013 and 2012: Intangible assets subject to amortization: 2013 Accumulated Amortization Gross Net Gross Customer relationships $ 1,062 $ (40) $ 1,022 $ Rug design coding Trade names Total 144 1,368 (14) (34) $ 2,574 $ (88) $ 130 1,334 2,486 Amortization expense for intangible assets is summarized as follows: 2012 Accumulated Amortization $ — $ Net — — 208 144 — $ 352 $ — $ 2013 2012 2011 Customer relationships Rug design coding Trade names Amortization expense $ $ 40 14 34 88 $ $ The estimated future amortization expense during each of the next five fiscal years is as follows: Year 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Thereafter NOTE 7 - ACCRUED EXPENSES Accrued expenses are summarized as follows: Compensation and benefits (1) Provision for customer rebates, claims and allowances Outstanding checks in excess of cash Other Total accrued expenses 208 144 — 352 — — — — Amount 146 146 146 146 146 1,756 — $ — — — $ $ 2013 2012 8,233 $ 6,202 3,873 7,894 5,637 4,389 2,523 6,598 26,202 $ 19,147 $ $ (1) Includes a liability related to the Company's self-insured Workers' Compensation program. This program is collateralized by letters of credit in the aggregate amount of $1,717. 48 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) NOTE 8 - PRODUCT WARRANTY RESERVES The Company generally provides product warranties related to manufacturing defects and specific performance standards for its products. Product warranty reserves are included in accrued expenses in the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. The following is a summary of the Company's product warranty activity. Warranty reserve at beginning of year Warranty liabilities accrued Warranty liabilities settled Changes for pre-existing warranty liabilities Warranty reserve at end of year NOTE 9 - LONG-TERM DEBT AND CREDIT ARRANGEMENTS Long-term debt consists of the following: Revolving credit facility Mortgage note payable Obligation to Development Authority of Gordon County Note payable - Robertex acquisition Equipment notes payable Notes payable Capital lease obligations Total long-term debt Less: current portion of long-term debt Total long-term debt, less current portion Revolving Credit Facility Senior Credit Facility 2013 2012 $ $ 1,297 $ 4,330 (3,905) 128 1,850 $ 1,219 3,122 (3,118) 74 1,297 2013 2012 $ 85,274 $ — 4,447 3,789 7,987 2,210 4,281 107,988 (6,229) $ 101,759 $ 60,122 10,141 5,339 — 5,071 632 2,920 84,225 (4,059) 80,166 On September 14, 2011, the Company entered into a five-year, secured revolving credit facility (the "senior credit facility"). The senior credit facility provided for a maximum of $90,000 of revolving credit, subject to borrowing base availability, including limited amounts of credit in the form of letters of credit and swingline loans. The borrowing base was equal to specified percentages of the Company's eligible accounts receivable, inventories and fixed assets less reserves established, from time to time, by the administrative agent under the senior credit facility. The Company can use the proceeds of the senior credit facility for general corporate purposes, including financing acquisitions and refinancing other indebtedness. At the Company's election, revolving loans under the senior credit facility bore interest at annual rates equal to either (a) LIBOR for 1, 2 or 3 month periods, as selected by the Company, plus an applicable margin of either 2.00% or 2.25%, or (b) the higher of the prime rate, the Federal Funds rate plus 0.5%, or a daily LIBOR rate, plus an applicable margin of either 1.00% or 1.50%. The applicable margin was determined based on availability under the senior credit facility with margins increasing as availability decreases. The Company also paid an unused line fee on the average amount by which the aggregate commitments exceed utilization of the senior credit facility equal to 0.375% per annum. The senior credit facility included certain affirmative and negative covenants that impose restrictions on the Company's financial and business operations, including limitations on debt, liens, investments, fundamental changes in the Company's business, asset dispositions, dividends and other similar restricted payments, transactions with affiliates, payments and modifications of certain existing debt, future negative pledges, and changes in the nature of the Company's business. The Company was also required to maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.1 to 1.0 during any period that borrowing availability was less than $10,000. 49 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) Amended Senior Credit Facility As amended, the Company's senior credit facility ("amended senior credit facility") provides for a maximum of $130,000 of revolving credit, subject to borrowing base availability. The borrowing base is currently equal to specified percentages of the Company's eligible accounts receivable, inventories, fixed assets and real property less reserves established, from time to time, by the administrative agent under the facility. In addition, the term of the facility was extended to August 1, 2018. At the Company's election, revolving loans under the amended senior credit facility bear interest at annual rates equal to either (a) LIBOR for 1, 2 or 3 month periods, as selected by the Company, plus an applicable margin of either 1.50%, 1.75% or 2.00%, or (b) the higher of the prime rate, the Federal Funds rate plus 0.5%, or a daily LIBOR rate plus 1.00%, plus an applicable margin of either 0.50%, 0.75% or 1.00%. The applicable margin is determined based on availability under the amended senior credit facility with margins increasing as availability decreases. The Company continues to pay an unused line fee on the average amount by which the aggregate commitments exceed utilization of the senior credit facility equal to 0.375% per annum. The amended senior credit facility continues to include certain affirmative and negative covenants that impose restrictions on the Company's financial and business operations. The amended senior credit facility requires that Company maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.1 to 1.0 during any period that borrowing availability is less than $14,440. At December 28, 2013, the Company is in compliance with the amended senior credit facility's covenants. Average Interest Rates and Availability The weighted-average interest rate on borrowings outstanding under these facilities was 2.66% at December 28, 2013 and 3.59% at December 29, 2012. As of December 28, 2013, the unused borrowing availability under the amended senior credit facility was $32,618. Mortgage Note Payable On April 1, 2013, the Company terminated its five-year $11,063 mortgage loan which had a balance of $9,833. The mortgage loan was secured by the Company's Susan Street real estate and liens secondary to the senior credit facility. The mortgage loan was scheduled to mature on September 13, 2016. Prior to the termination, the mortgage loan bore interest at a variable rate equal to one month LIBOR plus 3.00% and was payable in equal monthly installments of principal of $61, plus interest calculated on the declining balance of the mortgage loan, with a final payment of $7,436 due on maturity. Obligation to Development Authority of Gordon County On November 2, 2012, the Company signed a 6.00% seller-financed note of $5,500 with Lineage PCR, Inc. (“Lineage”) related to the acquisition of the continuous carpet dyeing facility in Calhoun, Georgia. Effective December 28, 2012 through a series of agreements between the Company, the Development Authority of Gordon County, Georgia (the “Authority”) and Lineage, obligations with identical payment terms as the original note to Lineage are now payment obligations to the Authority. These transactions were consummated in order to provide a tax abatement to the Company related to the real estate and equipment at this facility. The tax abatement plan provides for abatement for certain components of the real and personal property taxes for up to ten years. At any time, the Company has the option to pay off the obligation, plus a nominal amount. The debt to the Authority bears interest at 6.00% and is payable in equal monthly installments of principal and interest of $106 over 57 months. Note Payable - Robertex Acquisition Only July 1, 2013, the Company signed a 4.50% seller-financed note of $4,000, which was recorded at a fair value of $3,749, with Robert P. Rothman related to the acquisition of Robertex Associates, LLC ("Robertex") in Calhoun, Georgia. The note is payable in five annual installments of principal of $800 plus interest. The note matures June 30, 2018. Deferred Financing Costs and Refinancing Expenses In connection with the amendments in 2013 and 2012, the Company incurred additional financing costs of $351 and $28, respectively, that are being amortized over the remaining term of the facility. In addition, the Company incurred $37 of financing costs related to an equipment note payable. Additionally in 2013, the Company recognized $94 of refinancing expenses related to the write-off of previously deferred financing costs related to the Company's mortgage note payable. During 2012, the Company incurred $187 in financing costs related to the obligations to the Authority that is being amortized over the term of the obligation. As a result of the refinancing in 2011, the Company paid $1,410 in financing cost that is being amortized over the term of the senior credit facility and the mortgage loan. Additionally in 2011, the Company recognized $317 of refinancing expenses of which $92 related to the write-off of previously deferred financing costs and $225 related to fees paid to 3rd parties in connection with the new senior credit facility and mortgage loan. 50 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) Equipment Notes Payable The terms of the Company's equipment financing notes are as follows: Instrument Note Payable - Equipment Note Payable - Equipment Note Payable - Equipment Note Payable - Equipment Note Payable - Equipment Note Payable - Equipment Note Payable - Equipment Interest Rate Term (Months) Principal and Interest Payments Frequency Maturity Date 6.85% 7.72% 2.00% 5.94% 1.00% 6.84% 6.86% 84 $ 48 60 75 84 60 60 38 2 38 41 18 3 49 Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly May 1, 2014 June 1, 2014 August 1, 2016 February 1, 2019 June 14, 2020 July 1, 2018 October 1, 2018 In connection with certain of the equipment financing notes, the Company is required to maintain funds in a separate escrow account. At December 28, 2013 and December 29, 2012, the balances held were $1,401 and $2,048, respectively, and are included in other current assets on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The Company's equipment financing notes are secured by the specific equipment financed and do not contain any financial covenants. Capital Lease Obligations The terms of the Company's capitalized lease obligations are as follows: Instrument Capital Lease - Equipment Capital Lease - Equipment Capital Lease - Equipment Capital Lease - Equipment Capital Lease - Equipment Capital Lease - Equipment Capital Lease - Equipment Capital Lease - Equipment Capital Lease - Equipment Capital Lease - Equipment Interest Rate Term (Months) Principal and Interest Payments Frequency Maturity Date 7.04% 7.40% 2.90% 4.76% 5.74% 5.90% 5.75% 4.88% 7.04% 5.10% 84 $ 48 60 72 56 60 60 48 60 60 8 4 11 32 2 7 7 Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly 16 Quarterly 8 3 Monthly Monthly December 1, 2015 June 1, 2014 August 1, 2017 October 1, 2018 October 1, 2017 April 1, 2018 July 1, 2018 April 1, 2017 October 1, 2018 November 1, 2018 The Company's capitalized lease obligations are secured by the specific equipment leased. Convertible Subordinated Debentures On October 5, 2011, the Company optionally redeemed all of the outstanding 7.00% convertible subordinated debentures pursuant to the provisions of the Indenture dated May 15, 1987. The debentures were originally set to mature on May 15, 2012. The redemption price of $9,925 represented 100% of the principal amount of the debentures plus accrued and unpaid interest. The principal balance at October 5, 2011 was $9,662. The debentures were convertible by their holders into shares of the Company's Common Stock at an effective conversion price of $32.20 per share. No holders exercised their right to convert their debentures into shares of our Common Stock. 51 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) Interest Payments and Debt Maturities Interest payments for continuing operations were $3,067 in 2013, $2,795 in 2012, and $3,338 in 2011. Maturities of long-term debt for periods following December 28, 2013 are as follows: 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Thereafter Total Long-Term Debt Capital Leases (See Note 17) Total $ 5,392 $ 3,835 3,842 3,182 87,053 403 $ 837 877 801 761 1,005 — $ 103,707 $ 4,281 $ 6,229 4,712 4,643 3,943 88,058 403 107,988 NOTE 10 - FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS Fair value is defined as the exchange value of an asset or a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. The fair value guidance outlines a valuation framework and establishes a fair value hierarchy in order to increase the consistency and comparability of fair value measurements and disclosures. The hierarchy consists of three levels as follows: Level 1 - Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reported date; Level 2 - Other than quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities, quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, and other than quoted prices for assets or liabilities and prices that are derived principally from or corroborated by market data by correlation or other means; and Level 3 - Measurements using management's best estimate of fair value, where the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation. The following table reflects the fair values of assets and liabilities measured and recognized at fair value on a recurring basis on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 28, 2013 and December 29, 2012: Assets: Rabbi trust (1) Interest rate swaps (2) Liabilities: Interest rate swaps (2) Deferred compensation plan (3) Contingent consideration (4) 2013 2012 Fair Value Hierarchy Level 14,242 $ 11,894 556 — Level 2 Level 2 813 $ 13,210 2,751 1,086 11,066 1,928 Level 2 Level 1 Level 3 $ $ (1) The Company maintains a rabbi trust that serves as an investment designed to offset its deferred compensation plan liability. The investment assets of the trust consist of life insurance policies for which the Company recognizes income or expense based upon changes in cash surrender value. (2) The fair value of the interest rate swaps was obtained from external sources. The interest rate swaps were valued using observable inputs (e.g., LIBOR yield curves, credit spreads). Valuations of interest rate swaps may fluctuate considerably from period-to-period due to volatility in underlying interest rates, which are driven by market conditions and the duration of the instrument. Credit adjustments could have a significant impact on the valuations due to changes in credit ratings of the Company or its counterparties. (3) Senior management and other highly compensated associates may defer a specified percentage of their compensation into a non-qualified deferred compensation plan. Changes in the value of the deferred compensation under this plan is recognized each period based on the fair value of the underlying measurement funds. (4) As a result of the Colormaster and Crown Rug acquisitions in 2012 and the Robertex acquisition in 2013, the Company recorded contingent consideration liabilities at fair value. These fair value measurements were based on calculations that utilize significant inputs not observable in the market including forecasted revenues, gross margins and discount rates and thus represent Level 3 measurements. 52 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) These fair value measurements are directly impacted by the Company's estimates. Accordingly, if the estimates are higher or lower than the estimates within the fair value measurement, the Company would record additional charges or benefits, respectively, as appropriate. Changes in the fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the years ending December 28, 2013 and December 29, 2012 were as follows: Beginning balance Contingent consideration liabilities recorded at fair value at acquisition Fair value adjustments Settlements Ending balance 2013 2012 1,928 $ 1,307 (23) (461) — 1,974 — (46) 2,751 $ 1,928 $ $ There were no transfers of assets or liabilities between Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 during 2013 or 2012. If any, the Company recognizes the transfers in or transfers out at the end of the reporting period. The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company's financial instruments are summarized as follows: Financial assets: Cash and cash equivalents Notes receivable, including current portion Interest rate swaps Financial Liabilities: 2013 2012 Carrying Amount Fair Value Carrying Amount Fair Value $ $ 255 282 556 $ 255 282 556 $ 491 307 — 491 307 — Long-term debt and capital leases, including current portion 107,988 101,752 Interest rate swaps 813 813 84,225 1,086 80,174 1,086 The fair values of the Company's long-term debt and capital leases were estimated using market rates the Company believes would be available for similar types of financial instruments and represent level 2 measurements. The fair values of cash and cash equivalents and notes receivable approximate their carrying amounts due to the short-term nature of the financial instruments. NOTE 11 - DERIVATIVES The Company's earnings, cash flows and financial position are exposed to market risks relating to interest rates. It is the Company's policy to minimize its exposure to adverse changes in interest rates and manage interest rate risks inherent in funding the Company with debt. The Company addresses this risk by maintaining a mix of fixed and floating rate debt and entering into interest rate swaps for a portion of its variable rate debt to minimize interest rate volatility. The following is a summary of the Company's interest rate swaps as of December 28, 2013: Type Interest rate swap Interest rate swap Interest rate swap Interest rate swap Interest rate swap Notional Amount $ $ $ $ $ 10,000 10,000 5,000 25,000 25,000 October 3, 2011 through September 1, 2016 Effective Date Fixed Rate 1.330% Variable Rate 1 Month LIBOR March 1, 2013 through September 1, 2016 1.620% 1 Month LIBOR June 1, 2013 through September 1, 2016 1.700% 1 Month LIBOR September 1, 2016 through September 1, 2021 3.105% 1 Month LIBOR September 1, 2015 through September 1, 2021 3.304% 1 Month LIBOR On September 14, 2011, the Company refinanced its senior revolving credit facility and entered into a new mortgage note payable. The Company had two interest rate swaps that were designated as cash flow hedges of the interest rate risk created by the variable interest rate paid on the revolving credit facility which matured on May 11, 2013 and the mortgage note payable 53 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) which matured on April 1, 2013. At the time of refinancing, the Company simultaneously dedesignated and redesignated these swaps as cash flow hedges. At the time of the refinancing, the interest rate swaps had a negative fair value and were presented as accrued expenses and other liabilities on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. The related accumulated other comprehensive loss of the swaps was frozen at the time of the refinancing and was amortized into interest expense through the maturity dates of the cash flow hedges. The accumulated loss had an unamortized balance of $779 and $0 at September 14, 2011 and December 28, 2013, respectively. The Company amortized $158, $467 and $150 of losses into earnings related to these two interest rate swaps during 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. On September 14, 2011, the Company entered into two swaption agreements that permitted the Company to cancel two of the existing interest rate swaps at specified dates. The Company did not designate these swaptions as cash flow hedges; therefore, change in fair value related to these instruments were recognized into earnings. During 2012, the Company terminated the swaptions and received consideration of $285. The following table summarizes the fair values of derivative instruments included in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets: Location on Consolidated Balance Sheets Fair Value 2013 2012 Asset Derivatives: Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: Interest rate swaps Other Assets Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: Interest rate swaptions Total Asset Derivatives Other Assets Liability Derivatives: Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: Interest rate swaps, current portion Interest rate swaps, long term portion Total Liability Derivatives Accrued Expenses Other Long-Term Liabilities $ $ $ $ 556 $ — 556 $ — — — 328 485 813 $ $ 439 647 1,086 The following tables summarize the pre-tax impact of derivative instruments on the Company's financial statements: Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: Cash flow hedges - interest rate swaps $ 381 $ (767) $ (665) Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in AOCIL on the effective portion of the Derivative 2013 2012 2011 Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: Cash flow hedges - interest rate swaps Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: Cash flow hedges - interest rate swaps 54 Amount of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from AOCIL on the effective portion into Income (1)(2) 2013 2012 2011 $ $ (442) $ (625) $ (583) Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized on the ineffective portion in Income on Derivative (3) 2013 2012 2011 — $ — $ — THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (4) 2013 2012 2011 Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: Interest rate swaptions $ — $ 87 $ 43 (1) The amount of gain (loss) reclassified from AOCIL is included in interest expense on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations. (2) The amount of loss expected to be reclassified from AOCIL into earnings during the next 12 months subsequent to fiscal 2013 is $328. (3) The amount of gain (loss) recognized in income on the ineffective portion of interest rate swaps is included in other (income) expense, net on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations. (4) The amount of gain (loss) recognized in income for derivatives not designated as hedging instruments is included in other (income) expense, net on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations. NOTE 12 - EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS Defined Contribution Plans The Company sponsors a 401(k) defined contribution plan that covers a significant portion, or approximately 82% of the Company's associates. This plan was modified in 2012 compared with prior years to include a mandatory Company match on the first 1% of participants' contributions. The Company matches the next 2% of participants' contributions if the Company meets prescribed earnings levels. The plan also provides for additional Company contributions above the 3% level if the Company attains certain additional performance targets. The Company elected not to match participants' contributions in 2011. Matching contribution expense for this 401(k) plan was $610 for 2013 and $247 for 2012. Additionally, the Company sponsors a 401(k) defined contribution plan that covers those associates at one facility who are under a collective-bargaining agreement, or approximately 18% of the Company's associates. Under this plan, the Company generally matches participants' contributions, on a sliding scale, up to a maximum of 2.75% of the participant's earnings. Matching contribution expense for the collective-bargaining 401(k) plan was $86 in 2013, $78 in 2012 and $87 in 2011. Non-Qualified Retirement Savings Plan The Company sponsors a non-qualified retirement savings plan that allows eligible associates to defer a specified percentage of their compensation. The obligations owed to participants under this plan were $13,210 at December 28, 2013 and $11,066 at December 29, 2012 and are included in other long-term liabilities in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. The obligations are unsecured general obligations of the Company and the participants have no right, interest or claim in the assets of the Company, except as unsecured general creditors. The Company utilizes a Rabbi Trust to hold, invest and reinvest deferrals and contributions under the plan. Amounts are invested in Company-owned life insurance in the Rabbi Trust and the cash surrender value of the policies was $14,242 at December 28, 2013 and $11,894 at December 29, 2012 and is included in other assets in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. Multi-Employer Pension Plan The Company contributes to a multi-employer pension plan under the terms of a collective-bargaining agreement that covers its union-represented employees. These union-represented employees represented approximately 18% of the Company's total employees. The risks of participating in multi-employer plans are different from single-employer plans. If a participating employer stops contributing to the plan, the unfunded obligations of the plan may be borne by the remaining participating employers. If the Company chooses to stop participating in the multi-employer plan, the Company may be required to pay the plan an amount based on the underfunded status of the plan, referred to as a withdrawal liability. The Company's participation in the multi-employer pension plan for 2013 is provided in the table below. The "EIN/Pension Plan Number" column provides the Employee Identification Number (EIN) and the three digit plan number. The most recent Pension Protection Act (PPA) zone status available in 2013 and 2012 is for the plan's year-end at 2012 and 2011, respectively. The zone status is based on information that the Company received from the plan and is certified by the plan's actuary. Among other factors, plans in the red zone are generally less than 65% funded, plans in the yellow zone are less than 80% funded and plans in the green zone are at least 80% funded. The "FIP/RP Status Pending/Implemented" column indicates a plan for which a financial improvement plan (FIP) or a rehabilitation plan (RP) is either pending or has been implemented. The last column lists the expiration date of the collective-bargaining agreement to which the plan is subject. 55 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) Pension Fund EIN/Pension Plan Number Pension Protection Act Zone Status 2013 2012 FIP/RP Status Pending/ Implemented (1) Contributions (2) 2013 2012 2011 Surcharge Imposed (1) Expiration Date of Collective- Bargaining Agreement The Pension Plan of the National Retirement Fund 13-6130178 - 001 Red Red Implemented $ 279 $ 256 $ 292 Yes 6/8/2014 (1) The collective-bargaining agreement requires the Company to contribute to the plan at the rate of $0.37 per compensated hour for each covered employee during the life of the collective-bargaining agreement. The Company will make additional contributions, as mandated by law, in accordance with the agreed to schedule for the fund's 2010 Rehabilitation Plan. The Rehabilitation Plan was effective June 1, 2010 and requires a surcharge equal to $0.02 per hour (from $0.37 to $0.39) effective June 1, 2010 - May 31, 2011, a surcharge equal to $0.05 per hour (from $0.37 to $0.42) effective June 1, 2011 - May 31, 2012 a surcharge equal to $0.08 per hour (from $0.37 to $0.45) effective June 1, 2012 to May 31, 2013 and a surcharge equal to $0.10 per hour (from $0.37 to $0.47) effective June 1, 2013 to May 31, 2014. Based upon current employment and benefit levels, the Company's contributions to the multi-employer pension plan are expected to be approximately $284 for 2014. (2) The Company's contributions to the plan do not represent more than 5% of the total contributions to the plan for the most recent plan year available. Postretirement Plans The Company sponsors a legacy postretirement benefit plan that provides life insurance to a limited number of associates as a result of a prior acquisition. The Company also sponsors a postretirement benefit plan that provides medical insurance for a limited number of associates who retired prior to January 1, 2003 and life insurance to a limited number of associates upon retirement. Information about the benefit obligation and funded status of the Company's postretirement benefit plans is summarized as follows: Change in benefit obligation: Benefit obligation at beginning of year Service cost Interest cost Participant contributions Actuarial gain Benefits paid Medicare Part D subsidy Benefit obligation at end of year Change in plan assets: Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year Employer contributions Participant contributions Benefits paid Medicare Part D subsidy Fair value of plan assets at end of year Unfunded amount 2013 2012 $ 694 $ 7 23 15 (137) (5) 1 598 — (11) 15 (5) 1 — 733 7 26 15 (80) (11) 4 694 — (8) 15 (11) 4 — $ (598) $ (694) 56 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) The balance sheet classification of the Company's liability for postretirement benefit plans is summarized as follows: Accrued expenses Other long-term liabilities Total liability 2013 2012 $ $ 18 $ 580 598 $ 17 677 694 Benefits expected to be paid on behalf of associates for postretirement benefit plans during the period 2014 through 2023 are summarized as follows: Years 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 - 2023 Postretirement Plans $ 18 18 18 18 18 96 Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations of the Company's postretirement benefit plans are summarized as follows: Weighted-average assumptions as of year-end: Discount rate (benefit obligations) Assumptions used and related effects of health care cost are summarized as follows: Health care cost trend assumed for next year Rate to which the cost trend is assumed to decline Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate 2013 2012 3.16% 2.81% 2013 2012 8.00% 5.00% 2017 9.00% 5.00% 2017 The effect of a 1% change in the health care cost trend on the Company's postretirement benefit plans is summarized as follows: Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation $ 4 $ (3) $ 3 $ (3) 2013 2012 1% Increase 1% Decrease 1% Increase 1% Decrease Components of net periodic benefit cost (credit) for all postretirement plans are summarized as follows: Service cost Interest cost Amortization of prior service credits Recognized net actuarial gains Settlement gain Net periodic benefit cost (credit) 2013 2012 2011 $ $ $ 7 23 (88) (35) (105) (198) $ $ 7 26 (88) (45) (48) (148) $ 7 33 (88) (29) (12) (89) 57 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) Pre-tax amounts included in AOCIL for the Company's postretirement benefit plans at 2013 are summarized as follows: Prior service credits Unrecognized actuarial gains Totals NOTE 13 - INCOME TAXES Postretirement Benefit Plans Balance at 2013 2014 Expected Amortization $ $ (190) $ (397) (587) $ (88) (39) (127) The provision (benefit) for income taxes on income (loss) from continuing operations consists of the following: 2013 2012 2011 Current Federal State Total current Deferred Federal State Total deferred $ 216 178 394 (955) (82) (1,037) $ 154 $ 88 242 (592) (51) (643) Income tax provision (benefit) $ (643) $ (401) $ 725 213 938 (234) (20) (254) 684 Differences between the provision (benefit) for income taxes and the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes are summarized as follows: Federal statutory rate Statutory rate applied to income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes Plus state income taxes, net of federal tax effect Total statutory provision (benefit) Increase (decrease) attributable to: Nondeductible meals and entertainment Domestic production activities deduction Federal tax credits Goodwill Change in valuation allowance Non-taxable insurance proceeds Stock-based compensation Other items Total tax provision (benefit) 2013 2012 2011 35% 35% 35% $ 1,650 $ (369) $ 96 1,746 112 (208) (1,326) 283 (1,190) (71) — 11 $ (643) $ 24 (345) 88 — — — — — 14 (158) (401) $ 684 130 814 83 — (179) — — (174) 61 79 684 During 2013, the Company reversed $1,190 of previously established reserves related to state income tax loss carryforwards and state income tax credit carryforwards. The reversal of the reserves was based on a number of factors including current and future earnings assumptions by taxing jurisdiction. Additionally, 2013 included certain tax credits of approximately $520 related to 2009 - 2011 determined to be available for utilization and $304 of 2012 research and development tax credits that could not be recognized until the extension of the credit was approved by Congress in 2013. 58 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) The Company’s 2012 effective income tax benefit rate varied from statutory rates primarily as a result of adjustments to estimates used in the 2011 estimated tax calculations versus amounts used in the subsequent tax return filing for the 2011 period; net of the effects of permanent differences on the lower level of pre-tax earnings in the 2012 tax calculations. During 2011, the Company agreed upon a settlement associated with an Internal Revenue Service audit for tax years 2004 through 2009. This settlement agreement resulted in a payable of approximately $1,300 related to certain temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets for financial reporting purposes and the tax basis of those assets. Thus, the settlement agreement resulted in an increase in deferred tax assets and had no material impact on earnings. The settlement payment was paid in 2012. Income tax payments, net of income tax refunds received for continuing and discontinued operations were $58 in 2013, $1,318 in 2012 and $97 in 2011. Significant components of the Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows: 2013 2012 Deferred tax assets: Inventories Retirement benefits Federal/State net operating losses Federal/State tax credit carryforwards Allowances for bad debts, claims and discounts Other Total deferred tax assets Valuation allowance Net deferred tax assets Deferred tax liabilities: Property, plant and equipment Total deferred tax liabilities Net deferred tax asset Balance sheet classification: Current deferred tax assets Non-current deferred tax liabilities Net deferred tax asset $ 2,226 $ 3,408 2,936 1,740 2,527 5,279 18,116 (3,748) 14,368 11,818 11,818 2,324 3,464 3,221 2,111 1,845 5,497 18,462 (4,938) 13,524 11,733 11,733 $ $ $ 2,550 $ 1,791 2013 2012 6,622 $ 4,072 2,550 $ 5,615 3,824 1,791 At December 28, 2013, $2,936 of deferred tax assets related to approximately $67,222 of state tax net operating loss carryforwards and $1,740 state tax credit carryforwards were available to the Company that will expire in five to ten years. A valuation allowance of $3,748 is recorded to reflect the estimated amount of deferred tax assets that may not be realized during the carryforward periods. At December 28, 2013, the Company is in a net deferred tax asset position of $2,550. The Company performed an analysis related to the net deferred tax asset and believes that the net tax asset is recoverable in future periods. Tax Uncertainties The Company accounts for uncertainty in income tax positions according to FASB guidance relating to uncertain tax positions. Unrecognized tax benefits were $291 at December 28, 2013 and $5 at December 29, 2012. There were no significant interest or penalties accrued as of December 28, 2013 or December 29, 2012. The Company does not expect its unrecognized tax benefits to change significantly during the next twelve months. 59 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) The following is a summary of the change in the Company's unrecognized tax benefits: 2013 2012 2011 Balance at beginning of year Additions based on tax positions taken during a prior period Additions based on tax positions taken during a current period Reductions related to settlement of tax matters Reductions related to a lapse of applicable statute of limitations Balance at end of year $ $ 5 $ 250 41 — (5) 291 $ $ 16 — — — (11) 5 $ 47 — — (17) (14) 16 The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to United States federal income taxes, as well as income taxes in a number of state jurisdictions. The tax years subsequent to 2009 remain open to examination for U.S. federal income taxes. The majority of state jurisdictions remain open for tax years subsequent to 2009. A few state jurisdictions remain open to examination for tax years subsequent to 2008. NOTE 14 - COMMON STOCK AND EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE Common & Preferred Stock The Company's charter authorizes 80,000,000 shares of Common Stock with a $3 par value per share and 16,000,000 shares of Class B Common Stock with a $3 par value per share. Holders of Class B Common Stock have the right to twenty votes per share on matters that are submitted to Shareholders for approval and to dividends in an amount not greater than dividends declared and paid on Common Stock. Class B Common Stock is restricted as to transferability and may be converted into Common Stock on a one share for one share basis. The Company's charter also authorizes 200,000,000 shares of Class C Common Stock, $3 par value per share, and 16,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock. No shares of Class C Common Stock or Preferred Stock have been issued. Earnings Per Share The Company's unvested stock awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents, whether paid or unpaid, are considered participating securities and should be included in the computation of earnings per share. For 2012, these participating securities were not included in the determination of EPS because to do so would be anti-dilutive. The accounting guidance requires additional disclosure of EPS for common stock and unvested share-based payment awards, separately disclosing distributed and undistributed earnings. Undistributed earnings represent earnings that were available for distribution but were not distributed. Common stock and unvested share-based payment awards earn dividends equally. All earnings were undistributed in all periods presented. 60 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations: 2013 2012 2011 Basic earnings (loss) per share: Income (loss) from continuing operations Less: Allocation of earnings to participating securities Income (loss) from continuing operations available to common shareholders - basic Basic weighted-average shares outstanding (1) Basic earnings (loss) per share - continuing operations Diluted earnings (loss) per share: Income (loss) from continuing operations available to common shareholders - basic Add: Undistributed earnings reallocated to unvested shareholders Income (loss) from continuing operations available to common shareholders - basic Basic weighted-average shares outstanding (1) Effect of dilutive securities: Stock options (2) Directors' stock performance units (2) $ $ $ $ $ 5,358 $ (212) 5,146 12,737 0.40 $ $ (653) $ — (653) $ 12,638 (0.05) $ 5,146 $ (653) $ 2 — 5,148 $ (653) $ 12,737 12,638 54 61 — — Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding (1)(2) 12,852 12,638 Diluted earnings (loss) per share - continuing operations $ 0.40 $ (0.05) $ 1,272 (31) 1,241 12,585 0.10 1,241 — 1,241 12,585 1 37 12,623 0.10 Includes Common and Class B Common shares, less shares held in treasury, in thousands. (1) (2) Because their effects are anti-dilutive, shares issuable under stock option plans where the exercise price is greater than the average market price of the Company's Common Stock at the end of the relevant period, directors' stock performance units, and shares issuable on conversion of subordinated debentures into shares of Common Stock have been excluded. Aggregate shares excluded were 510 in 2013, 827 shares in 2012 and 1,337 shares in 2011. NOTE 15 - STOCK PLANS AND STOCK COMPENSATION EXPENSE The Company recognizes compensation expense relating to share-based payments based on the fair value of the equity instrument issued and records such expense in selling and administrative expenses in the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. The number of shares to be issued is determined by dividing the specified dollar value of the award by the market value per share on the grant date. Pursuant to a policy adopted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors applicable to awards granted for years 2009 through 2013, $5.00 per share will be used as the market value per share to calculate the number of shares to be issued if the market value per share is less than $5.00 per share on the grant date. The Company's stock compensation expense was $847 for 2013, $937 for 2012 and $663 for 2011. 2006 Stock Awards Plan On May 3, 2006, the Company's shareholders' approved and adopted the Company's 2006 Stock Awards Plan (the "2006 Plan") which provided for the issuance of up to 800,000 shares of Common Stock and/or Class B Common Stock as stock-based or stock-denominated awards to directors of the Company and to salaried employees of the Company and its participating subsidiaries. The 2006 Plan superseded and replaced The Dixie Group, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan (the "2000 Plan"), which was terminated with respect to the granting of new awards. Awards previously granted under the 2000 Plan will continue to be governed by the terms of that plan and will not be affected by its termination. On April 27, 2010, the Company's shareholders' approved the amendment and restatement of the 2006 Plan to increase the number of shares that may be issued under the plan from 800,000 to 1,300,000. On April 30, 2013, the Company's shareholders' approved the amendment of the 2006 Plan to increase the number of shares that may be issued under the plan from 1,300,000 to 1,800,000. 61 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) Restricted Stock Awards Each executive officer has the opportunity to earn a Primary Long-Term Incentive Award of restricted stock and separately receive an award of restricted stock denominated as “Career Shares.” The number of shares issued, if any, is based on the market price of the Company’s Common Stock at the time of grant of the award, subject to a $5.00 per share minimum value. Primary Long- Term Incentive Awards vest over 3 years, and Career Shares vest when the participant becomes qualified to retire from the Company at 60 years of age and has retained the Career Shares for 2 years following the grant date. During 2013, the Company issued 173,249 shares of restricted stock to officers and other key employees. The grant-date fair value of the awards was $899, or $5.190 per share, and will be recognized as stock compensation expense over the vesting periods which range from 2 to 14 years from the date the awards were granted. Each award is subject to a continued service condition. The fair value of each share of restricted stock awarded was equal to the market value of a share of the Company's Common Stock on the grant date. During 2012, the Company issued 241,233 shares of restricted stock to officers and other key employees. The grant-date fair value of the awards was $998, or $4.135 per share, and will be recognized as stock compensation expense over the vesting periods which range from 2 to 15 years from the date the awards were granted. Additionally, the Company issued 48,000 shares of restricted stock to certain key employees. The grant-date fair value of the awards was $156, or $3.255 per share, and will be recognized as stock compensation over a 4 year vesting period from the date the awards were granted. Each award is subject to a continued service condition. The fair value of each share of restricted stock awarded was equal to the market value of a share of the Company's Common Stock on the grant date. During 2011, the Company granted 91,340 shares of restricted stock to officers and other key employees. The grant-date fair value of the awards was $417, or $4.565 per share, and will be recognized as stock compensation expense over the vesting periods which range from 2 to 16 years from the date the awards were granted. Each award is subject to a continued service condition. The fair value of each share of restricted stock awarded was equal to the market value of a share of the Company's Common Stock on the grant date. During 2010, the Company granted 100,940 shares of restricted stock to officers and other key employees of the Company. The grant-date fair value of the awards was $266, or $2.635 per share, and will be recognized as stock compensation expense over the vesting periods which range from 2 to 17 years from the date the awards were granted. Each award is subject to a continued service condition. The fair value of each share of restricted stock awarded was equal to the market value of a share of the Company's Common Stock on the grant date. During 2009, the Company amended and restated a 125,000 share Restricted Stock Award ("award") originally granted to its Chief Executive Officer on June 6, 2006 with a seven year term. The fair value on the date of the original award was $1,556, or $12.45 per share, equivalent to 92% of the market value of a share of the Company's Common Stock. Such value was determined using a binomial model and will be expensed over the term of the award. Vesting of the shares is contingent on a 35% increase in the market value of the Company's Common Stock (the "Market Condition") prior to five years from the date of the original grant. Additionally, vesting of shares requires the Chief Executive Officer to meet a continued service condition during the term of the award with a two year minimum vesting period. Shares subject to the award vest pro rata annually after the Market Condition and minimum vesting period are met on the anniversary date of the award. The award was amended to extend the term by one year to June 6, 2014, and to extend the time during which the awards' market condition may be met by three years to June 6, 2014. The modification resulted in incremental stock compensation expense of $41 which is amortized over the awards' remaining vesting period. 62 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) Restricted stock activity for the three years ended December 28, 2013 is summarized as follows: Outstanding at December 25, 2010 Granted Vested Forfeited Outstanding at December 31, 2011 Granted Vested Forfeited Outstanding at December 29, 2012 Granted Vested Forfeited Outstanding at December 28, 2013 Number of Shares 301,179 $ 91,340 (85,990) — 306,529 289,233 (113,647) (17,229) 464,886 173,249 (112,336) — 525,799 $ Weighted- Average Grant- Date Fair Value 8.61 4.57 6.51 — 8.00 3.99 4.20 4.14 6.57 5.19 4.15 — 6.64 As of December 28, 2013, unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock was $1,260. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 4.2 years. The total fair value of shares vested was approximately $669, $439 and $385 during the year 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Stock Performance Units The Company's non-employee directors receive an annual retainer of $12 in cash and $12 in value of Stock Performance Units (subject to a $5.00 minimum per unit, for 2013, 2012 and 2011) under the Director's Stock Plan. The market value at the date of the grants in 2010 was above $5.00 per share; therefore, there was no reduction in the number of units issued. Units in 2012 and 2011 were reduced to reflect the $5.00 per share minimum. Upon retirement, the Company issues the number of shares of Common Stock equivalent to the number of Stock Performance Units held by non-employee directors at that time. As of December 28, 2013, 99,640 Stock Performance Units were outstanding under this plan. Stock Purchase Plan The Company has a stock purchase plan which authorizes 108,000 shares of Common Stock for purchase by supervisory associates at the market price prevailing at the time of purchase. At December 28, 2013, 27,480 shares remained available for issuance under the plan. Shares sold under this plan are held in escrow until paid for and are subject to repurchase agreements which give the Company a right of first refusal to purchase the shares if they are subsequently sold. No shares were sold under the plan in 2013, 2012 or 2011. Stock Options All stock options issued under the Company's 2000 Plan were exercisable generally at a cumulative rate of 25% per year after the second year from the date the options were granted. Options granted under the Company's 2006 Plan are exercisable for periods determined at the time the awards are granted. Effective 2009, the Company established a $5.00 minimum exercise price on all options granted. No options were granted during 2013, 2012 or 2011. The fair value of each option was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model. Expected volatility was based on historical volatility of the Company's stock, calculated using the most recent period equal to the expected life of the options. The risk-free interest rate was based on the U.S. Treasury yield for a term equal to the expected life of the option at the time of grant. The Company uses historical exercise behavior data of similar employee groups to determine the expected life of options. 63 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) Option activity for the three years ended December 28, 2013 is summarized as follows: Number of Shares Weighted- Average Exercise Price Weighted- Average Fair Value of Options Granted During the Year Outstanding at December 25, 2010 786,728 $ 10.91 $ Granted Exercised Forfeited Outstanding at December 31, 2011 Granted Exercised Forfeited Outstanding at December 29, 2012 Granted Exercised Forfeited — — — 786,728 — — (89,321) 697,407 — (37,052) — — — — 10.91 — — 10.20 11.00 — 5.15 — Outstanding at December 28, 2013 660,355 $ 11.33 $ Options exercisable at: December 31, 2011 December 29, 2012 December 28, 2013 682,478 $ 638,407 630,855 11.81 11.56 11.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — The following table summarizes information about stock options at December 28, 2013: Options Outstanding Range of Exercise Prices Number of Shares Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life Weighted-Average Exercise Price $4.20 - $5.00 $6.96 - $6.96 $11.85 - $17.58 $3.875 - $17.58 126,750 83,435 450,170 660,355 5.1 years 1.3 years 1.4 years 2.1 years $ $ Options Exercisable 4.93 6.96 13.94 11.33 Range of Exercise Prices Number of Shares Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life Weighted-Average Exercise Price $4.20 - $5.00 $6.96 - $6.96 $11.85 - $17.58 $3.875 - $17.58 97,250 83,435 450,170 630,855 4.8 years 1.3 years 1.4 years 1.9 years $ $ 4.91 6.96 13.94 11.63 At December 28, 2013, the market value of all outstanding stock options exceeded their exercise price by $502 and the market value of exercisable stock options exceeded their exercise price by $293. At December 28, 2013, unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock options was $18 and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 0.9 years. 64 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) NOTE 16 - OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) Components of other comprehensive income (loss) are as follows: Other comprehensive income (loss): Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps: Before income taxes Income taxes Net of taxes $ Reclassification of loss into earnings from interest rate swaps: Before income taxes Income taxes Net of taxes Amortization of unrealized loss on dedesignated interest rate swaps: Before income taxes Income taxes Net of taxes Unrecognized net actuarial gain on postretirement benefit plans: Before income taxes Income taxes Net of taxes Reclassification of net actuarial gain into earnings from postretirement benefit plans: Before income taxes Income taxes Net of taxes Reclassification of prior service credits into earnings from postretirement benefit plans: Before income taxes Income taxes Net of taxes 2013 2012 2011 381 145 236 284 108 176 158 60 98 32 12 20 (35) (13) (22) (88) (34) (54) $ (767) $ (291) (476) 158 60 98 467 178 289 33 13 20 (45) (18) (27) (88) (34) (54) Other comprehensive income (loss) $ 454 $ (150) $ (665) (253) (412) 433 165 268 150 57 93 108 41 67 (29) (11) (18) (88) (33) (55) (57) 65 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) Components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, are as follows: Interest Rate Swaps Post- Retirement Liabilities Total Balance at December 25, 2010 Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps, net of tax of $253 Reclassification of loss into earnings from interest rate swaps, net of tax of $165 Amortization of unrealized loss on dedesignated interest rate swaps, net of tax of $57 Unrecognized net actuarial gain on postretirement benefit plans, net of tax of $41 Reclassification of net actuarial gain into earnings from postretirement benefit plans, net of tax of $11 Reclassification of prior service credits into earnings from postretirement benefit plans, net of tax of $33 Balance at December 31, 2011 Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps, net of tax of $291 Reclassification of loss into earnings from interest rate swaps, net of tax of $60 Amortization of unrealized loss on dedesignated interest rate swaps, net of tax of $178 Unrecognized net actuarial gain on postretirement benefit plans, net of tax of $13 Reclassification of net actuarial gain into earnings from postretirement benefit plans, net of tax of $18 Reclassification of prior service credits into earnings from postretirement benefit plans, net of tax of $34 Balance at December 29, 2012 Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps, net of tax of $145 Reclassification of loss into earnings from interest rate swaps, net of tax of $108 Amortization of unrealized loss on dedesignated interest rate swaps, net of tax of $60 Unrecognized net actuarial gain on postretirement benefit plans, net of tax of $12 Reclassification of net actuarial gain into earnings from postretirement benefit plans, net of tax of $13 Reclassification of prior service credits into earnings from postretirement benefit plans, net of tax of $34 $ (514) $ (412) 268 93 — — — (565) (476) 98 289 — — — (654) 236 176 98 — — — 483 $ — — — 67 (18) (55) 477 — — — 20 (27) (54) 416 — — — 20 (22) (54) Balance at December 28, 2013 $ (144) $ 360 $ NOTE 17 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES Commitments (31) (412) 268 93 67 (18) (55) (88) (476) 98 289 20 (27) (54) (238) 236 176 98 20 (22) (54) 216 The Company had purchase commitments of $11,619 at December 28, 2013, primarily related to machinery & equipment. At December 28, 2013, the Company has outstanding letters of credit of $3 which relate to commitments to foreign vendors. The Company enters into fixed-price contracts with suppliers to purchase natural gas to support certain manufacturing processes. The Company had contract purchases of $1,109 in 2013, $1,127 in 2012 and $1,438 in 2011. At December 28, 2013, the Company has commitments to purchase natural gas of $838 for 2014 and $304 for 2015. 66 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) The Company leases certain equipment under capital leases and certain buildings, machinery and equipment under operating leases. Commitments for minimum rentals under non-cancelable leases, including any applicable rent escalation clauses, are as follows: 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Thereafter Total commitments Less amounts representing interest Total Capital Leases Operating Leases $ 1,040 $ 1,037 919 838 1,037 — 4,871 (590) $ 4,281 $ 2,421 2,132 1,898 1,470 1,067 4,739 13,727 — 13,727 During 2013, the Company entered into 10 year lease agreement to lease a warehouse in Adairsville, Georgia. The lease is estimated to begin on or about May 1, 2014. Base annual rent is initially set at $64 per month with escalating amounts over the lease term. Total base rent payable over the lease period is $7,976 which is included in the table above. The Company has two options to extend the term of the lease for an additional five year period. The Company is party to an operating lease with a related party which was entered into as part of the Robertex acquisition in 2013. Rent paid to the related party during 2013 was $127. Rental expense was approximately $2,434, $2,188 and $2,334 during the years 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Property, plant and equipment includes machinery and equipment under capital leases which have asset cost and accumulated depreciation of $5,390 and $914, respectively, at December 28, 2013, and $3,376 and $394, respectively, at December 29, 2012. Contingencies The Company assesses its exposure related to legal matters, including those pertaining to product liability, safety and health matters and other items that arise in the regular course of its business. If the Company determines that it is probable a loss has been incurred, the amount of the loss, or an amount within the range of loss, that can be reasonably estimated will be recorded. Environmental Remediation The Company accrues for losses associated with environmental remediation obligations when such losses are probable and estimable. Remediation obligations are accrued based on the latest available information and are recorded at undiscounted amounts. The Company regularly monitors the progress of environmental remediation. Should studies indicate that the cost of remediation has changed from the previous estimate, an adjustment to the liability would be recorded in the period in which such determination is made. (See Note 20) Legal Proceedings At December 28, 2013, the Company was a plaintiff in a lawsuit against a former raw material supplier. In its lawsuit, the Company alleges that the former supplier sold defective materials to the Company over a period of time, which, when applied to certain of the Company’s products, caused those products to become defective and unmerchantable in the ordinary course of the Company’s business. On January 31, 2014, the Company and the supplier settled its claim for $400. The difference in the amount previously recognized and the settlement amount was recorded in other operating (income) expense in 2013. 67 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) NOTE 18 - OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE Other operating (income) expense, net is summarized as follows: Other operating (income) expense, net: Insurance proceeds (1) Loss on property, plant and equipment disposals Retirement expenses Contract settlement Miscellaneous (income) expense Other operating (income) expense, net 2013 2012 2011 $ $ (202) $ — $ 195 154 172 175 494 1 201 — (134) $ 68 $ (492) 37 371 — (182) (266) (1) The Company recognized settlement gains of $202 and $492 from company-owned insurance policies during 2013 and 2011, respectively. Other (income) expense, net is summarized as follows: Other (income) expense, net: (Gain) loss on non-hedged swaptions Gain on sale of non-operating assets Miscellaneous (income) expense Other (income) expense, net 2013 2012 2011 $ $ — $ (87) $ — 26 26 (187) (3) $ (277) $ (43) — (32) (75) NOTE 19 - FACILITY CONSOLIDATION AND SEVERANCE EXPENSES, NET 2008 Facilities Consolidation In 2008 and 2009, in response to the difficult economic conditions, the Company consolidated certain manufacturing operations and ceased operating in a leased facility and made organizational changes to reduce staff and expenses throughout the Company ("2008 Facilities Consolidation"). Costs related to the facilities consolidation included equipment and inventory relocation, severance costs, employee relocation, asset impairments and costs associated with terminating a lease obligation. During 2011, the Company terminated a lease obligation and paid a termination fee of $700 resulting in a gain of $551 from the reduction of previously accrued estimates associated with this plan. Total costs to complete this restructuring plan were $7,410. There are no remaining costs to be incurred under this plan. Total restructuring costs related to the 2008 Facilities Consolidation are summarized as follows: Total expenses by activity $ 3,192 $ 1,095 $ 1,459 $ 1,664 $ 7,410 Equipment and Inventory Relocation Severance Pay and Employee Relocation Asset Impairments Lease Obligations Total 2009 Organization Restructuring In 2009, the Company developed and implemented a plan to realign its organizational structure to combine its three residential carpet units into one business with three distinct brands ("2009 Organization Restructuring"). As a result, the Company's residential business is organized much like its commercial carpet business and more like the rest of the industry. Costs related to the organization realignment included severance costs, associate relocation expenses and costs related to the migration of certain computer applications necessary to support the realignment. During 2011, the Company had a reduction of expenses of $12 associated with this plan. Total costs to complete this restructuring plan were $1,450. There are no remaining costs to be incurred under this plan. 68 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) Total restructuring costs related to the 2009 Organization Restructuring are summarized as follows: Total expenses by activity Severance Pay and Employee Relocation Computer Systems Conversion Costs Total $ 969 $ 481 $ 1,450 Expenses incurred under these plans are classified in "facility consolidation and severance (benefit) expense, net" in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations. NOTE 20 - DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS The Company has previously either sold or discontinued certain operations that are accounted for as "Discontinued Operations" under applicable accounting guidance. The Company has certain contingent obligations directly related to such operations, primarily related to self-insured workers' compensation and environmental liabilities. Costs related to these obligations for those businesses are classified as discontinued operations. Discontinued operations are summarized as follows: Loss from discontinued operations: Workers' compensation costs Environmental remediation costs Loss from discontinued operations, before taxes Income tax benefit Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax Workers' Compensation 2013 2012 2011 $ $ (23) $ (143) $ (74) (97) (29) (279) (422) (148) (68) $ (274) $ (237) (196) (433) (147) (286) Undiscounted reserves are maintained for the self-insured workers' compensation obligations. These reserves are administered by a third party workers' compensation service provider under the supervision of Company personnel. Such reserves are reassessed on a quarterly basis. Pre-tax cost incurred for workers' compensation as a component of discontinued operations primarily represents a change in estimate for each period from unanticipated medical costs associated with the Company's obligations. Environmental Remediation Reserves for environmental remediation obligations are established on an undiscounted basis. The Company has ongoing obligations at five previously owned sites that were associated with its discontinued textile businesses. Each of these sites contains relatively low levels of ground or ground water contaminants. Each site has a Corrective Action Plan ("CAP") with the applicable authoritative state regulatory body responsible for oversight for environmental compliance and the Company contracts with third party qualified environmental specialists for related remediation, monitoring and reporting for each location. The CAP for four of these sites involves natural attenuation (degradation of the contaminants through naturally occurring events) over periods currently estimated at 10 to 20 years and the CAP on the remaining site involves a pump and treat remediation process, currently estimated to remediate over a period of 25 years. Additionally, the Company has an environmental liability related to the property of a facility and related business that was sold in 2004. The CAP, involving an oxidation-based remediation plan, was approved in 2010 and is currently estimated to remediate over a 7 year period beginning in 2010. The Company has an accrual for environmental remediation obligations of $1,830 and $1,838 as of December 28, 2013 and December 29, 2012, respectively. The liability established represents the Company's best estimate of possible loss and is the reasonable amount to which there is any meaningful degree of certainty given the periods of estimated remediation and the dollars applicable to such remediation for those periods. The actual timeline to remediate, and thus, the ultimate cost to complete such remediation through these remediation efforts, may differ significantly from our estimates. Pre-tax cost for environmental remediation obligations classified as discontinued operations were primarily a result of specific events requiring action and additional expense in each period. NOTE 21 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS During 2013, the Company purchased a portion of its requirements for polyester fiber from Engineered Floors, an entity controlled by Robert E. Shaw. Mr. Shaw reported holding approximately 10% of the Company's Common Stock, which as of year-end represented approximately 4% of the total vote of all classes of the Company's Common Stock. Engineered Floors is the Company's principal supplier of polyester fiber and polyester broadloom carpet. Total purchases from Engineered Floors for 69 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) 2013 and 2012 were approximately $12,000 and $8,000, respectively; or approximately 8% of the Company's external yarn and carpet purchases in 2013 and 2012. Purchases from Engineered Floors are based on market value, negotiated prices. The Company has no contractual arrangements or commitments with Mr. Shaw associated with its business relationship with Engineered Floors. Transactions with Engineered Floors were reviewed and approved by the Company's board of directors. During 2013, the Company entered into a 10-year lease with the Rothman Family Partnership to lease a manufacturing facility as part of the Robertex acquisition. The Rothman Family Partnership includes Robert P. Rothman who is an associate of the Company. Rent paid to the Rothman Family Partnership during 2013 was $127. The lease was based on current market values for similar facilities. NOTE 22 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS Debt Amendment On January 20, 2014, the Company entered into a Seventh Amendment to its senior credit facility to amend certain definitions to increase the other Permitted Purchase Money Indebtedness to an amount not to exceed $40,000. Restructuring Plan On January 20, 2014, the Company's Board of Directors approved a 2014 Warehousing/Distribution/Manufacturing Restructuring Plan intended to align the Company's warehousing, distribution and manufacturing to support its growth and manufacturing strategy. The plan is intended to create a better cost structure and improve distribution capabilities and customer service. The key element and first major step of this plan is the leasing and occupancy of a 292,000 square foot finished goods warehouse, cut-order and distribution facility in Adairsville, Georgia, such lease and occupancy to commence as of May 1, 2014. The Company expects the plan to be substantially completed in the second quarter of the fiscal year ending December 26, 2015. The Company currently expects the implementation of this plan will result in total restructuring expenses of approximately $2,400, with approximately $1,300 such expenses during the fiscal year ending December 27, 2014 and approximately $1,100 such expenses during the fiscal year ending December 26, 2015, primarily consisting of moving and relocation expenses, information technology expenses and expenses relating to conversion and realignment of equipment. Joint Venture On February 10, 2014, the Company announced that it had signed a letter of intent to enter into a Joint Venture with Desso, NV, a Netherlands based Company, for the purpose of selling and distributing Hospitality floorcovering products in the United States market, and such other territories as the parties may determine from time to time. The Joint Venture is intended to build the company’s presence in the upscale Hospitality market by combining the parties’ sales forces and product offerings. Although the letter of intent is non-binding, the parties anticipate working quickly to develop a mutually acceptable Joint Venture structure designed to accomplish their goals. At the same time, the parties announced that they had entered into a sales and distribution agreement that will permit the Company to be the exclusive distributor of certain of Desso’s high performance tile products and Desso to distribute the Company's products in Europe. This arrangement is conditioned upon, among other matters, achievement of certain sales levels pursuant to the sales and distribution agreement and the successful launch of the Hospitality Joint Venture. Restricted Stock Grant On March 12, 2014, the Company issued 101,315 shares of restricted stock to officers of the Company. The shares will vest over periods ranging from 2 to 13 years from the date of the awards were granted. Each award is subject to a continued service condition. 70 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K ITEM 15(c) EXHIBITS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 28, 2013 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE Exhibit Index EXHIBIT NO. EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE (2.1) (3.1) (3.2) Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of June 30, 2013. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (2.1) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 30, 2013. * Text of Restated Charter of The Dixie Group, Inc. as Amended - Blackline Version. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (3.4) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 27, 2003. * Amended By-Laws of The Dixie Group, Inc. as of February 22, 2007. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 26 2007.* (10.1) The Dixie Group, Inc. Director's Stock Plan. ** Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10y) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 27, 1997. * (10.2) (10.3) The Dixie Group, Inc. New Non-qualified Retirement Savings Plan effective August 1, 1999. ** Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.1) to Dixie's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 26, 1999. * The Dixie Group, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan Amended and Restated Master Trust Agreement effective as of August 1, 1999. ** Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.2) to Dixie's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 26, 1999. * (10.4) The Dixie Group, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan, as amended. ** Incorporated by reference to Annex A to Dixie's Proxy Statement dated April 5, 2002 for its 2002 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. * (10.5) Form of Stock Option Agreement under The Dixie Group, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan. ** Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.23) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2001. * (10.6) (10.7) (10.8) Form of Stock Rights and Restrictions Agreement for Restricted Stock Award under The Dixie Group, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan, as amended.** Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.35) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 25, 2004. * Form of Stock Option Agreement under The Dixie Group, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan for Non- Qualified Options Granted December 20, 2005.** Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.1) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 20, 2005. * Summary Description of the Director Compensation Arrangements for The Dixie Group, Inc.** Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.34) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 25, 2004. * (10.9) The Dixie Group, Inc. 2006 Stock Awards Plan. ** (10.10) Summary Description of the 2006 Incentive Compensation Plan, approved February 23, 2006.** Incorporated by reference to Annex A to the Company's Proxy Statement for its 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, filed March 20, 2006. * Incorporated by reference to Current Report on Form 8- K dated March 1, 2006. * 71 EXHIBIT NO. EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE (10.11) (10.12) (10.13) (10.14) (10.15) (10.16) Summary Description of The Dixie Group, Inc., 2006 Incentive Compensation Plan/Range of Incentives.** Filed herewith. Material terms of the performance goals for the period 2007-2011, pursuant to which incentive compensation awards may be made to certain key executives of the Company based on the results achieved by the Company during such years, approved March 14, 2006.** Form of Award of Career Shares under the 2006 Incentive Compensation Plan for Participants holding only shares of the Company's Common Stock.** Form of Award of Career Shares under the 2006 Incentive Compensation Plan for Participants holding shares of the Company's Class B Common Stock.** Form of Award of Long Term Incentive Plan Shares under the 2006 Incentive Compensation Plan for Participants holding only shares of the Company's Common Stock.** Form of Award of Long Term Incentive Plan Shares under the 2006 Incentive Compensation Plan for Participants holding shares of the Company's Class B Common Stock.** Incorporated by reference to Current Report on Form 8- K dated March 20, 2006. * Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.1) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 6, 2006. * Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.2) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 6, 2006. * Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.3) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 6, 2006. * Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.4) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 6, 2006. * (10.17) Award of 125,000 shares of Restricted Stock under the 2006 Stock Awards Plan to Daniel K. Frierson.** Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.1) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 7, 2006. * (10.18) Summary description of The Dixie Group, Inc. 2007 Annual Compensation Plan.** Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.1) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 26, 2007.* (10.19) (10.20) Rule 10b5-1 and 10b-18 Repurchase Agreement by and between The Dixie Group, Inc. and Raymond James & Associates, Inc. dated December 11, 2007* Merger agreement between The Dixie Group, Inc. and Unite Here National Retirement Fund regarding the Company's Masland Bargaining Unit Defined Benefit Pension Plan.** Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (99.1) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 11, 2007* Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (99.1) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 28, 2007* (10.21) Summary description of The Dixie Group, Inc. 2008 Annual Incentive Plan.** Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 15, 2008* (10.22) Summary description of The Dixie Group, Inc. 2009 Annual Incentive Plan.** Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 26, 2009* (10.23) (10.24) Amended and restated award of 125,000 shares of Restricted Stock under the 2006 Stock Awards Plan to Daniel K. Frierson.** Master Lease Agreement, Corporate Guaranty and Schedule to the Master Lease Agreement by and between General Electric Capital Corporation and Masland Carpets, LLC dated August 21, 2009. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 21, 2009.* Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.1, 10.2, 10.3) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 25, 2009.* 72 EXHIBIT NO. EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE (10.25) Agreement by and between Raymond James & Associates, Inc. dated November 6, 2008, to repurchase shares of The Dixie Group, Inc.'s Common Stock. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (99.1) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 6, 2008.* (10.26) Summary description of The Dixie Group, Inc. 2010 Incentive Compensation Plan/Range of Incentives.** Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.1) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 3, 2010.* (10.27) Fixed Rate Swap Agreement between Bank of America, N.A. and The Dixie Group, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.1) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 19, 2010.* (10.28) Fixed Rate Swap Agreement between Bank of America, N.A. and The Dixie Group, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.1) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 8, 2010.* (10.29) (10.30) (10.31) (10.32) (10.33) (10.34) (10.35) (10.36) Termination of interest rate swap between Bank of America, N.A. and The Dixie Group, Inc. dated April 19, 2010. Summary Description of The Dixie Group, Inc. 2011 Incentive Compensation Plan/Range of Incentives.** Credit Agreement, by and among The Dixie Group, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries, as Borrowers, cert of its subsidiaries, as Guarantor, the Lendors from time to time party thereto, Wells Fargo Bank Capital Finance LLC, as Administrative Agent, and co-lender and Bank of America and the Other parties thereto, dated September 13, 2011. Security Agreement, by and among The Dixie Group, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries, as Borrowers, certain of its subsidiaries, as Guarantor, the Lenders from time to time party thereto, Wells Fargo Bank Capital Finance LLC, as Administrative Agent, and co-lender and Bank of America and the Other parties thereto, dated September 13, 2011. Form of Mortgages, by and among The Dixie Group, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries, as Borrowers, certain of its subsidiaries, as Guarantor, the Lenders from time to time party thereto, Wells Fargo Bank Capital Finance LLC, as Administrative Agent, and co-lender and Bank of America and the Other parties thereto, dated September 13, 2011. Credit Agreement, by and between The Dixie Group, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries named therein, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as lender, dated September 13, 2011. Security Agreement, by and between The Dixie Group, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries named therein, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as lender, dated September 13, 2011. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.2) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 8, 2010.* Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.1) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 1, 2011.* Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.10) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 14, 2011.* Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.11) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 14, 2011.* Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.12) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 14, 2011.* Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.20) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 14, 2011.* Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.21) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 14, 2011.* First Mortgage, by and between The Dixie Group, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries named therein, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as lender, dated September 13, 2011. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.22) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 14, 2011.* (10.37) Summary Description of The Dixie Group, Inc. 2012 Incentive Compensation Plan/Range of Incentives.** Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.1) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 12, 2012.* 73 EXHIBIT NO. EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE (10.38) (10.39) (10.40) (10.41) (10.42) (10.43) (10.44) (10.45) Amended and Modified Financing Agreement, by and between The Dixie Group, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries named therein, and General Electric Credit Corporation, as lender, dated June 26, 2012. Agreement to Reduce Security Deposit Amount and Amendment to Security Deposit Pledge Agreement, dated June 26, 2012. Summary Description of The Dixie Group, Inc. 2012 Incentive Compensation Plan/Range of Incentives.** First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of November 2, 2012, by and among The Dixie Group, Inc., certain of its subsidiaries, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Agent and the persons identified as Lenders therein. First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of November 2, 2012, by and among The Dixie Group, Inc., certain of it subsidiaries, and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC as Agent and the persons identified as Lenders therein. Intercreditor Agreement dated as of November 2, 2012, by and among Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Agents and The Dixie Group, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries. Summary Description of The Dixie Group, Inc. 2013 Incentive Compensation Plan/Range of Incentives.** Obligation to the Development Authority of Gordon County; by and among Masland Carpets, LLC, Purchase and Sale Agreement dated December 28, 2012. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.1) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 26, 2012.* Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.2) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 26, 2012.* Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.1) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 22, 2012.* Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.1) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 5, 2012.* Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.2) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 5, 2012.* Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.3) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 5, 2012.* Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.1) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 15, 2013.* Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4.12) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2012 .* (10.46) Obligation to the Development Authority of Gordon County; by and among Masland Carpets, LLC, Bill of Sale, dated December 28, 2012. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4.12) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2012. * (10.47) (10.48) (10.49) Obligation to the Development Authority of Gordon County; by and among Masland Carpets, LLC, Lease Agreement, dated December 28, 2012. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4.12) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2012 .* Obligation to the Development Authority of Gordon County; by and among Masland Carpets, LLC, Short Form Lease Agreement, dated December 28, 2012. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4.12) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2012 .* Obligation to the Development Authority of Gordon County; by and among Masland Carpets, LLC, Option Agreement, dated December 28, 2012. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4.12) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2012 .* (10.50) Obligation to the Development Authority of Gordon County; by and among Masland Carpets, LLC, Pilot Agreement, dated December 28, 2012. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4.12) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2012 .* 74 EXHIBIT NO. EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE (10.51) (10.52) (10.53) (10.54) (10.55) (10.56) (10.57) (10.58) (10.59) (10.60) (10.61) Obligation to the Development Authority of Gordon County; by and among Masland Carpets, LLC, Loan Agreement, dated December 28, 2012. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4.12) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2012 .* Obligation to the Development Authority of Gordon County; by and among Masland Carpets, LLC, Loan and Security Agreement, dated December 28, 2012. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4.12) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2012 .* Obligation to the Development Authority of Gordon County; by and among Masland Carpets, LLC, Deed to Secure Debt and Security Agreement, dated December 28, 2012. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4.12) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2012 .* Obligation to the Development Authority of Gordon County; by and among Masland Carpets, LLC, Notice and Consent to Assignment, dated December 28, 2012. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4.12) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2012 .* Obligation to the Development Authority of Gordon County; by and among Masland Carpets, LLC, Absolute Assignment of Deed to Secure Debt and Security Agreement and Other Loan Documents, dated December 28, 2012. Second Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of April 1, 2013, by and among The Dixie Group, Inc. certain of its subsidiaries and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as Agent and the persons identified as Lenders therein. Third Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of May 22, 2013, by and among The Dixie Group, Inc. certain of its subsidiaries and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as Agent and the persons identified as Lenders therein. Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of July 1, 2013, by and among The Dixie Group, Inc. certain of its subsidiaries and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as Agent and the persons identified as Lenders therein. Fifth Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of July 30, 2013, by and among The Dixie Group, Inc. certain of its subsidiaries and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as Agent and the persons identified as Lenders therein. Sixth Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of August 30, 2013, by and among The Dixie Group, Inc. certain of its subsidiaries and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as Agent and the persons identified as Lenders therein. Seventh Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of January 20, 2014, by and among The Dixie Group, Inc. certain of its subsidiaries and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as Agent and the persons identified as Lenders therein. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4.12) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2012 .* Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.01) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 3, 2013.* Filed herewith. Filed herewith. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.1) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 10-Q dated August 7, 2013. * Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.1) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 10-Q dated November 6, 2013. * Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.1) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 21, 2014. * (10.62) Summary Description of The Dixie Group, Inc. 2014 Incentive Compensation Plan/Range of Incentives.** Filed herewith. (14) (16) Code of Ethics, as amended and restated, February 15, 2010. Letter from Ernst & Young LLP regarding change in certifying accountant. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14 to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 26, 2009.* Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 16 to Dixie's Form 8-K dated November 15, 2013.* 75 EXHIBIT NO. EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE (21) (23) (31.1) (31.2) (32.1) (32.2) Subsidiaries of the Registrant. Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. CEO Certification pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a). CFO Certification pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a). CEO Certification pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b). CFO Certification pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b). Filed herewith. Filed herewith. Filed herewith. Filed herewith. Filed herewith. Filed herewith. (101.INS) XBRL Instance Document Filed herewith. (101.SCH) XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document Filed herewith (101.CAL) XBRL Taxaonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document Filed herewith. (101.DEF) XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document Filed herewith. (101.LAB) XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document (101.PRE) XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document Filed herewith. Filed herewith. * Commission File No. 0-2585. ** Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. 76 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549 SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION (Rule 14a-101) Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. ) Filed by the Registrant Filed by a Party other than the Registrant Check the appropriate box: Preliminary Proxy Statement Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) Definitive Proxy Statement Definitive Additional Materials Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12 The Dixie Group, Inc. (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): No fee required. Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: Total fee paid: Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. 1) 2) 3) 4) Amount Previously Paid: Form, Schedule or Registrant Statement No.: Filing Party: Date Filed: THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. 104 Nowlin Lane, Suite 101 Chattanooga, Tennessee 37421 (423) 510-7000 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS To the Shareholders of The Dixie Group, Inc.: The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of The Dixie Group, Inc. will be held at the Chattanoogan Hotel, Chattanooga, Tennessee, on April 29, 2014 at 8:00 a.m., Eastern Time, for the following purposes: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. To elect nine individuals to the Board of Directors for a term of one year each; To consider and approve the material terms of the Performance Goals of the Annual Incentive Compensation Plan applicable to 2014 - 2018. To cast an advisory vote on the Company’s Executive Compensation for its named executive officers (“say-on- pay”); To ratify appointment of Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP to serve as independent registered public accountants of the Company for 2014; and Such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting of Shareholders or any adjournment thereof. Only shareholders of record of the Common Stock and Class B Common Stock at the close of business on February 28, 2014, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof. Your attention is directed to the Proxy Statement accompanying this Notice for more complete information regarding the matters to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting. The Dixie Group, Inc. Daniel K. Frierson Chairman of the Board Chattanooga, Tennessee Dated: March 24, 2014 PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED MATERIAL CAREFULLY AND COMPLETE, DATE AND SIGN THE ENCLOSED PROXY AND RETURN IT PROMPTLY TO THE COMPANY IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE SO THAT YOUR SHARES OF COMMON STOCK AND CLASS B COMMON STOCK WILL BE REPRESENTED AT THE MEETING. IF YOU ATTEND THE MEETING, YOU MAY REVOKE YOUR PROXY AND VOTE YOUR SHARES IN PERSON, SHOULD YOU SO DESIRE. Important Notice Regarding Internet Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 29, 2014 The proxy statement and annual report to shareholders are available under "Annual Report and Proxy Materials" at www.thedixiegroup.com/investor/investor.html. THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. 104 Nowlin Lane, Suite 101 Chattanooga, Tennessee 37421 (423) 510-7000 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS April 29, 2014 PROXY STATEMENT INTRODUCTION The enclosed Proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Company for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders. This Proxy Statement and the enclosed Proxy will be mailed on or about March 24, 2014, to shareholders of record of the Company’s Common Stock and Class B Common Stock as of the close of business on February 28, 2014. At the Annual Meeting, holders of the Company’s Common Stock, $3.00 par value per share (“Common Stock”), and Class B Common Stock, $3.00 par value per share (“Class B Common Stock”), will be asked to: (i) elect nine individuals to the Board of Directors for a term of one year each, (ii) approve the material terms of the Performance Goals of the Annual Incentive Compensation Plan applicable to 2014 - 2018; (iii) cast an advisory vote on the Company’s compensation for its named executive officers; (iv) ratify the appointment of Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP to serve as independent registered public accountants of the Company for 2014, and (v) transact any other business that may properly come before the meeting. The Board of Directors recommends that the Company’s shareholders vote (i) FOR electing the nine (9) nominees for director; (ii) FOR approving the material terms of the Performance Goals of the Annual Incentive Compensation Plan applicable to 2014 - 2018; (iii) FOR approving the Company’s executive compensation of its named executive officers; and (iv) FOR ratifying the appointment of Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP to serve as independent registered public accountants of the Company for 2014. RECORD DATE, VOTE REQUIRED AND RELATED MATTERS The Board has fixed the close of business on February 28, 2014, as the Record Date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. In accordance with the Company’s Charter, each outstanding share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote, and each outstanding share of Class B Common Stock is entitled to 20 votes, exercisable in person or by properly executed Proxy, on each matter brought before the Annual Meeting. Cumulative voting is not permitted. As of February 28, 2014, 12,453,166 shares of Common Stock, representing 12,453,166 votes, were held of record by approximately 2,350 shareholders (including an estimated 1,900 shareholders whose shares are held in nominee names, but excluding approximately 580 participants in the Company’s 401(k) Plan who may direct the voting of shares allocated to their accounts), and 866,875 shares of Class B Common Stock, representing 17,337,500 votes, were held by 12 individual shareholders, together representing an aggregate of 29,790,666 votes. Shares represented at the Annual Meeting by properly executed Proxy will be voted in accordance with the instructions indicated therein unless such Proxy has previously been revoked. If no instructions are indicated, such shares will be voted (i) FOR electing the nine (9) nominees for director; (ii) FOR approving the material terms of the Performance Goals of the Annual Incentive Compensation Plan applicable to 2014 - 2018; (iii) FOR approving the Company’s compensation of its named executive officers; and (iv) FOR ratifying the appointment of Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP to serve as independent registered public accountants of the Company for 2014. Any Proxy given pursuant to this solicitation may be revoked at any time by the shareholder giving it by (i) delivering to the Secretary of the Company a written notice of revocation bearing a later date than the Proxy, (ii) submitting a later-dated, properly executed Proxy, or (iii) revoking the Proxy and voting in person at the Annual Meeting. Attendance at the Annual Meeting will not, in and of itself, constitute a revocation of a Proxy. Any written notice revoking a Proxy should be sent to The Dixie Group, Inc., P.O. Box 25107, Chattanooga, Tennessee 37422-5107, Attention: Starr T. Klein, Secretary. The persons designated as proxies were selected by the Board of Directors and are Daniel K. Frierson, Lowry F. Kline and John W. Murrey, III. The cost of solicitation of Proxies will be borne by the Company. The presence, in person or by Proxy, of the holders of a majority of the aggregate outstanding vote of Common Stock and Class B Common Stock entitled to vote is necessary to constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting. In accordance with Tennessee law, Directors are elected by the affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes cast that are represented in person or by Proxy at the Annual Meeting. 1 The affirmative vote of a majority of the total votes cast is necessary for approval of the material terms of the Performance Goals for the Annual Incentive Compensation Plan applicable to 2014 - 2018. Ratification of the appointment of Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP to serve as independent registered public accountants of the Company for 2014 will be approved if the votes properly cast favoring ratification exceed the votes cast opposing ratification. Approval of the Company’s executive compensation for its named executive officers will be deemed to have been obtained if the number of votes cast in favor of such compensation exceeds the number of votes cast against such compensation. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome. Shares covered by abstentions and broker non-votes, while counted for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum at the Annual Meeting, are not considered to be affirmative votes. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect upon the election of a nominee for director, so long as such nominee receives any affirmative votes. For purposes of approval of the material terms of the Performance Goals for the Annual Incentive Compensation Plan applicable to 2014 - 2018, abstentions and broker non-votes will be considered negative votes. For purposes of ratification of the appointment of Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP, as independent registered public accountants, abstentions and broker non-votes will not be considered negative votes. A copy of the Company’s Annual Report for the year-ended December 28, 2013, is enclosed herewith. The Board is not aware of any other matter to be brought before the Annual Meeting for a vote of shareholders. If, however, other matters are properly presented, Proxies representing shares of Common Stock and Class B Common Stock will be voted in accordance with the best judgment of the proxy holders. 2 PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS Shareholders of record at the close of business on February 28, 2014, the Record Date, will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. The following is information regarding beneficial owners of more than 5% of the Company's Common Stock or Class B Common Stock. Beneficial ownership information is also presented for (i) the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table; (ii) all directors and nominees; and (iii) all directors and executive officers, as a group, as of February 28, 2014 (except as otherwise noted). Name and Address of Beneficial Owner Title of Class Daniel K. Frierson Number of Shares Beneficially Owned(1)(2) 111 East and West Road Common Stock 1,226,463 (3) Lookout Mountain, TN 37350 Class B Common Stock 866,875 (3) (4) Dimensional Fund Advisors, L.P. Palisades West, Building One, 6300 Bee Cave Road Common Stock Austin, TX 78746 Class B Common Stock 1,022,142 (5) — Royce & Associates, LLC 1414 Avenue of the Americas Common Stock 1,182,645 (6) New York, NY 10019 Class B Common Stock — % of Class 9.1 % 100.0 % 8.2 % — % 9.5 % — % Robert E. Shaw 115 West King Street Dalton, GA 30722-1005 T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund, Inc. Common Stock 1,275,000 (7) Class B Common Stock — 10.2 % — % 100 E. Pratt Street Baltimore, MD 21202 Common Stock 1,218,620 (8) Class B Common Stock — 9.8 % — % Wells Fargo & Company, on behalf of the following subsidiaries: Wells Capital Management Incorporated Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC Wells Fargo Fund Management, LLC Wells Fargo Bank, National Association 420 Montgomery Street San Francisco, CA 94104 Common Stock Class B Common Stock 602,772 (9) — 4.8 % — % 3 Additional Directors and Executive Officers Title of Class Number of Shares Beneficially Owned (1) % of Class Charles E. Brock Common Stock 4,380 (10) Class B Common Stock — — * J. Don Brock, Ph. D. Common Stock 59,318 (11) Class B Common Stock — — * Paul B. Comiskey Common Stock 85,714 (12) Class B Common Stock — — * Jon A. Faulkner Common Stock 132,058 (13) Class B Common Stock — 1.1 % — * W. Derek Davis Common Stock 105,396 (14) Class B Common Stock — — * Walter W. Hubbard Common Stock 23,240 (15) Class B Common Stock — — * Lowry F. Kline Common Stock 45,540 (16) Class B Common Stock — — * D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr. Common Stock 200,036 (17) Class B Common Stock 136,922 1.6 % 15.8 % Hilda S. Murray Common Stock 4,380 (18) Class B Common Stock — — * John W. Murrey, III Common Stock 40,518 (19) Class B Common Stock — — * Michael L. Owens Common Stock Class B Common Stock 214 (20) — — * All Directors, Named Executive Officers and Common Stock Executive Officers as Group (15 Persons) ** Class B Common Stock 1,802,328 866,875 (21) (22) 13.1 % 100.0 % * Percentage of shares beneficially owned does not exceed 1% of the Class. ** The total vote of Common Stock and Class B Common Stock represented by the shares held by all directors and executive officers as a group is 19,139,827 votes or 61.6% of the total vote. (1) Under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and for the purposes of these disclosures, a person is deemed to be a “beneficial owner” of a security if that person has or shares “voting power,” which includes the power to vote or to direct the voting of such security, or “investment power,” which includes the power to dispose or to direct the disposition of such security. Under these rules, more than one person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of the same securities. 4 The Class B Common Stock is convertible on a share-for-share basis into shares of Common Stock, and accordingly, outstanding shares of such stock are treated as having been converted to shares of Common Stock for purposes of determining both the number and percentage of class of Common Stock for persons set forth in the table who hold such shares. (2) Does not include 286,682 shares of Common Stock owned by The Dixie Group, Inc. 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan (the “401(k) Plan”) for which Daniel K. Frierson is a fiduciary and for which T. Rowe Price Trust Company serves as Trustee. Participants in the 401(k) Plan may direct the voting of all shares of Common Stock held in their accounts, and the Trustee must vote all shares of Common Stock held in the 401(k) Plan in the ratio reflected by such direction. Participants may also direct the disposition of such shares. Accordingly, for purposes of these disclosures, shares held for participants in the 401 (k) Plan are reported as beneficially owned by the participants. (3) Mr. Daniel K. Frierson's beneficial ownership of Common Stock and Class B Common Stock may be summarized as follows: Held outright Held by his wife Held by his children, their spouses and grandchildren Unvested restricted stock Options to acquire Common Stock, exercisable within 60 days Shares held in his Individual Retirement Account Shares held in 401(k) Plan Held as trustee of Rowena K. Frierson Charitable Remainder Unitrust Deemed conversion of his Class B Common Stock Total (a) Sole voting and investment power (b) Shared voting and investment power (c) Sole voting and shared investment power Number of Shares Common Stock Number of Shares Class B Common Stock 263 — 90,730 (b) 35,864 (a) 228,077 (a) 3,567 (a) 1,087 (a) — 866,875 1,226,463 372,960 (a) 94,879 (c) 189,300 (c) 187,189 (a) — 17,061 (a) — 5,486 (a) — 866,875 (4) The 866,875 includes 189,300 shares of Class B Common Stock are held subject to Shareholder's Agreement's among Daniel K. Frierson, his wife, their five children and respective family trusts, pursuant to which Daniel K. Frierson has been granted a proxy to vote such shares. (5) Dimensional Fund Advisors, L.P. has reported beneficial ownership of an aggregate of 1,022,142 shares of Common Stock, as follows: 1,005,965 shares of Common Stock, for which it has sole voting power, and 1, 022,142 shares of Common Stock for which it has sole dispositive power. The reported information is based upon the Schedule 13G filed by Dimensional Fund Advisors, L.P. with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 10, 2014. (6) Royce & Associates LLC has reported beneficial ownership of 1,182,645 shares of Common Stock for which it has sole dispositive power and sole voting power. The reported information is based upon the Schedule 13G filed by Royce & Associates LLC with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 8, 2014. (7) Robert E. Shaw has reported the beneficial ownership of 1,275,000 shares of Common Stock for which he has sole voting and sole dispositive power. The reported information is based upon the 13G filed by Mr. Shaw with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2014. (8) T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. and T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund, Inc. have reported beneficial ownership of an aggregate of 1,218,620 shares of Common Stock. T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. reports having sole dispositive power for all 1,218,620 shares and sole voting power for 103,820 of such shares, while T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund, Inc. reports sole voting power for the remaining 1,109,600 of such shares. The reported information is based upon the Schedule 13G filed jointly by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. and T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 10, 2014. (9) Wells Fargo & Company has reported the beneficial ownership of an aggregate of 602,772 shares of Common Stock, on behalf the following subsidiaries: Wells Capital Management Incorporated, Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC, Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. It has reported sole power to vote 1 share and sole power 5 to dispose of 1 of such shares and 508,140 shares of Common Stock for which it has shared voting power. The reported information is based on a Form 13G filed on November 12, 2013. (10) Mr. Charles E. Brock's beneficial ownership may be summarized as follows: Common Stock Options to acquire Common Stock Performance Units, convertible into shares of Common Stock on retirement as a director Total (11) Dr. J. Don Brock's beneficial ownership may be summarized as follows: Common Stock, held outright Options to acquire Common Stock, exercisable within 60 days Performance Units, convertible into shares of Common Stock on retirement as a director Total (12) Mr. Paul B. Comiskey's beneficial ownership may be summarized as follows: Common Stock, held outright Unvested Restricted Stock Held in 401(k) Plan Exercisable Stock Options Total (13) Mr. Jon A. Faulkner's beneficial ownership may be summarized as follows: Common Stock, held outright Unvested Restricted Stock Held in 401(k) Plan Exercisable Stock Options Total (14) Mr. W. Derek Davis' beneficial ownership may be summarized as follows: Common Stock, held outright Unvested Restricted Stock Held in 401(k) Plan Exercisable Stock Options Held by his wife Total 6 Number of Shares Common Stock — — 4,380 4,380 Number of Shares Common Stock 22,768 7,000 29,550 59,318 Number of Shares Common Stock 27,533 43,594 1,087 13,500 85,714 Number of Shares Common Stock 17,920 68,688 — 45,450 132,058 Number of Shares Common Stock 28,846 36,013 4,367 31,670 4,500 105,396 (15) Mr. Walter W. Hubbard's beneficial ownership may be summarized as follows: Options to acquire Common Stock, exercisable within 60 days Performance Units, convertible into shares of Common Stock on retirement as a director Total (16) Mr. Lowry F. Kline's beneficial ownership may be summarized as follows: Common Stock, held outright Options to acquire Common Stock, exercisable within 60 days Performance Units, convertible into shares of Common Stock on retirement as a director Total (17) Mr. D. Kennedy Frierson Jr.'s beneficial ownership may be summarized as follows: Number of Shares Common Stock 8,000 15,240 23,240 Number of Shares Common Stock 12,000 17,000 16,540 45,540 Held Outright Options to acquire Common Stock, exercisable within 60 days Shares held in 401(k) Shares held in trust(s) for children Unvested Restricted Stock Deemed conversion of Class B Stock Total Number of Shares Common Stock Number of Shares Class B Common Stock — 54,500 2,407 2,585 3,622 136,922 200,036 56,125 (a) — — 6,000 (a) 74,797 (a) — 136,922 (a) Subject to Shareholder's Agreement described in Note (4), above. Mr. Kennedy Frierson has sole investment power, and no voting power with respect to such shares. (18) Ms. Hilda S. Murray's beneficial ownership may be summarized as follows: Common Stock Options to acquire Common Stock Performance Units, convertible into shares of Common Stock on retirement as a director Total (19) Mr. John W. Murrey's beneficial ownership may be summarized as follows: Common Stock, held outright Options to acquire Common Stock, exercisable within 60 days Performance Units, convertible into shares of Common Stock on retirement as a director Held by wife Total Number of Shares Common Stock — — 4,380 4,380 Number of Shares Common Stock 3,468 7,000 29,550 500 40,518 7 (20) Mr. Michael L. Owens' beneficial ownership may be summarized as follows: Performance Units, convertible into shares of Common Stock on retirement as a director Total Number of Shares Common Stock 214 214 (21) Includes: (i) 144,163 shares of Common Stock owned directly by individuals in this group; (ii) 14,221 shares of Common Stock allocated to accounts in the 401(k) Plan of members of this group; (iii) options, which are either immediately exercisable, or exercisable within 60 days of the Record Date to purchase 433,249 shares of Common Stock; (iv) 99,854 shares of Common Stock held pursuant to performance units issued as payment of one-half of the annual retainer for the Company's non- employee directors; (v) 7,585 shares of Common Stock owned by immediate family members of certain members of this group; (vi) 3,567 shares held in individual retirement accounts; (vii) 232,813 unvested restricted shares of Common Stock held by individuals in this group, which shares may be voted by such individuals; and (viii) 866,875 shares of Class B Common Stock held by individuals in this group, that could be converted on a share for share basis into shares of Common Stock. (22) Includes: (i) 866,875 shares of Class B Common Stock held subject to the Shareholder Agreement described in Note (4) above. 8 Information About Nominees for Director PROPOSAL ONE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS Pursuant to the Company’s Bylaws, all Directors are elected to serve a one year term, or until their successors are elected and qualified. The Board of Directors is permitted to appoint directors to fill the unexpired terms of directors who resign. The names of the nominees for election to the Board, their ages, their principal occupation or employment (which has continued for at least the past five years unless otherwise noted), directorships held by them in other publicly-held corporations or investment companies, the dates they first became directors of the Company, and certain other relevant information with respect to such nominees are as follows: Charles E. Brock, age 49, is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Launch Tennessee, a public-private partnership, focused on the development of high-growth companies in Tennessee. Previously, he served as the Executive Entrepreneur of The Company Lab, a Chattanooga organization that serves as “the Front Door for Entrepreneurs” in Southeast Tennessee and one of Launch Tennessee's regional accelerators. Mr. Brock was a founding partner of the Chattanooga Renaissance Fund, a locally based angel investment group. Mr. Brock also serves as a director of Four Bridges Capital Advisors, a Chattanooga based boutique investment bank as well as director of CapitalMark Bank and Trust. Mr. Brock is not related to J. Don Brock. Mr. Brock is a member of the Company’s Audit Committee and a member of the Company's Compensation Committee. He has been a director of the Company since 2012. J. Don Brock, Ph. D., age 75, is the Chairman of the Board of Astec Industries, Inc., headquartered in Chattanooga, Tennessee, and a manufacturer of specialized equipment for building and restoring the world’s infrastructure. He has been a director of the Company since 1997. Dr. Brock is a member of the Company’s Audit Committee and a member of the Company’s Executive Committee. Daniel K. Frierson, age 72, is Chairman of the Board of the Company, a position he has held since 1987. He also has been Chief Executive Officer of the Company since 1980 and a director of the Company since 1973. Mr. Frierson serves as a director of Astec Industries, Inc., a manufacturer of specialized equipment for building and restoring the world’s infrastructure headquartered in Chattanooga, Tennessee, and Louisiana-Pacific Corporation, a manufacturer and distributor of building materials headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee. Mr. Frierson is Chairman of the Company’s Executive Committee and Chairman of the Company’s Retirement Plans Committee. D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr., age 47, is Chief Operating Officer of the Company, a position he has held since 2009. He has been President of Masland Residential, General Manager of Dixie Home, President of Bretlin as well as various other positions in operations, sales and senior management of the Company since 1998. Mr. Frierson is a member of the Company’s Retirement Plans Committee. He has been a director of the Company since 2012. Walter W. Hubbard, age 70, served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Honeywell Nylon, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Honeywell International, a manufacturer of nylon products from 2003 until his retirement in 2005. Prior to becoming President of Honeywell Nylon, Mr. Hubbard served as Group Vice President, Fiber Products of BASF Corporation from 1994 until 2003. He has been a director of the Company since 2005. Mr. Hubbard is a member of the Company’s Audit Committee and the Company's Compensation Committee. Lowry F. Kline, age 73, served as a director of Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc. since April 2000, serving as Chairman from April 2002 until April 2008, and as Vice Chairman from April 2000 to April 2003. Mr. Kline served as Chief Executive Officer of Coca- Cola Enterprises, Inc. from April 2001 until January 2004 and from December 2005 to April 2006. Prior to becoming Chief Executive Officer for Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc., he held a number of positions with said company, including Chief Administrative Officer, Executive Vice President and General Counsel. Mr. Kline is a member of the Board of Directors of Jackson Furniture Industries, Inc., headquartered in Cleveland, Tennessee, and McKee Foods Corporation, headquartered in Collegedale, Tennessee. He has been a director of the Company since 2004. Mr. Kline is Chairman of the Company’s Compensation Committee and a member of the Company’s Audit Committee and a member of the Company’s Executive Committee. Hilda S. Murray, age 59, is the Corporate Secretary and Executive Vice President of TPC Printing & Packaging, a specialty packaging and printing company in Chattanooga, TN. She is also founder and President of Greener Planet, LLC, an environmental compliance consultant to the packaging and printing industry. Ms. Murray is a member of the Company’s Audit Committee and the Company’s Retirement Plans Committee. She has been a director of the Company since 2012. John W. Murrey, III, age 71, previously served as a Senior member of the law firm of Witt, Gaither & Whitaker, P.C. in Chattanooga, Tennessee until June 30, 2001. Since 1993, Mr. Murrey has served as a director of Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated, a Coca-Cola bottler headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina and has served on its Audit Committee. From 2003 to 2007, he also served as a director of U. S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc., a truckload carrier headquartered in Chattanooga, Tennessee, and was Chairman of its Audit Committee. Mr. Murrey has been a director of the Company since 1997 and is Chairman of the Company’s Audit Committee and a member of the Company’s Compensation Committee. 9 Michael L. Owens, age 57, is Assistant Dean of Graduate Programs and Lecturer in the College of Business at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, Chattanooga, Tennessee. Prior to joining the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, Mr. Owens was President of Coverdell & Company, Atlanta, Georgia. Prior to joining Coverdell, he was Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Monumental Life Insurance Company. He has been a director of the Company since January 2014 and is a member of the Company's Audit Committee. D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr., the Company’s Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, is the son of Daniel K. Frierson. No other director, nominee, or executive officer of the Company has any family relationship, not more remote than first cousin, to any other director, nominee, or executive officer. Considerations with Respect to Nominees In selecting this slate of nominees for 2014, the Independent Directors of the Board considered the familiarity of the Company’s incumbents with the business and prospects of the Company, developed as a result of their service on the Company’s Board. The Board believes that such familiarity will be helpful in their service on the Company’s Board. In addition, the Independent Directors of the Board noted the particular qualifications, experience, attributes and skills possessed by its slate of nominees. These qualifications are reflected in the business experience listed under each nominee’s name, above. In order of the list of nominees, such information may be summarized as follows: Mr. Brock is experienced in establishing new businesses having been involved in the establishment of both Foxmark Media and CapitalMark Bank and Trust. Dr. Brock has a long history of executive management experience with Astec Industries, Inc., an international manufacturing company, headquartered in Chattanooga, Tennessee. Additionally, Dr. Brock has served with the Company as a director since 1997, including service on the Audit and Executive Committees of the Board. Mr. Daniel K. Frierson has served with the Company in several management and executive capacities his entire adult life, and has been Chief Executive Officer since 1980 and a Board member since 1973. In such capacity, he has been instrumental in planning and implementing the transition of the Company to its current position as a manufacturer of residential and commercial soft floorcovering products. Additionally, Mr. Frierson has experience as a board member of other public companies as well as significant trade group experience relevant to the Company’s business. He is well known and respected throughout the industry. Mr. D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr. has served with the Company in various capacities since 1992. He is currently Chief Operating Officer and has most recently led the Company’s Masland Residential business. Mr. Hubbard has highly relevant industry experience with businesses that are fiber producers and fiber suppliers, and that have served as fiber suppliers to the Company. Mr. Hubbard’s experience in the management of Honeywell Nylon and BASF Corporation, as outlined above, has given him valuable experience in management, relevant to his duties as a Director of the Company. Ms. Murray has a long history of executive management experience at TPC Printing and Packaging, a provider to the specialty packaging business as well as experience with environmental controls and footprint through Greener Planet. Mr. Kline has a long history of management and board level experience with the world’s largest bottler and distributor of Coca Cola Products. Additionally, he has an extensive background in business, corporate and securities law. Mr. Kline has served as a Director of the Company for several years, as reflected above, and serves on the Company’s Audit, Compensation and Executive Committees. Mr. Murrey has extensive experience in corporate, securities and business law, has experience drawn from board and committee service with several publicly-traded Companies, other than the Company; prior to his retirement in 2001, he represented the Company as counsel. Mr. Owens has extensive business and management experience, having served as President of Coverdell & Company prior to joining the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga. In addition, he has auditing experience having been employed as a certified public accountant. The Board of Directors recommends that the Company’s shareholders vote FOR electing the nine (9) nominees for director. Meetings of the Board of Directors The Board of Directors of the Company met six (6) times in 2013. Committees, Attendance, and Directors' Fees The Company has a standing Executive Committee, Audit Committee, Retirement Plans Committee, and Compensation Committee. As described in detail below, pursuant to provisions in its charter, the Company’s Compensation Committee, which consists entirely of independent directors, also performs the functions of a corporate governance committee and a nominating committee. Copies of the Charter of the Company’s Audit Committee and Compensation Committee may be found on the Company’s website at www.thedixiegroup.com/investor/investor.html. Members of the Executive Committee are Daniel K. Frierson, Chairman, J. Don Brock and Lowry F. Kline. Except as otherwise limited by law or by resolution of the Board of Directors, the Executive Committee has and may exercise all of the powers and authority of the Board of Directors for the management of the business and affairs of the Company, which power the Executive Committee exercises between the meetings of the full Board of Directors. The Executive Committee did not meet in 2013. Members of the Audit Committee are John W. Murrey, III, Chairman, Charles E. Brock, J. Don Brock, Walter W. Hubbard, Lowry F. Kline, Hilda S. Murray, and Michael L. Owens. All of the members of the Audit Committee are “independent directors” as 10 that term is defined by the applicable rule of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (“NASD”). The Audit Committee evaluates audit performance, handles relations with the Company’s independent auditors, and evaluates policies and procedures relating to internal accounting functions and controls. The Audit Committee has the authority to engage the independent accountants for the Company. The Audit Committee operates pursuant to an Audit Committee Charter adopted by the Board of Directors. The Audit Committee has implemented pre-approval policies and procedures related to the provision of audit and non-audit services performed by the independent auditors. Under these procedures, the Audit Committee approves the type of services to be provided and the estimated fees related to those services. The Audit Committee met four (4) times in 2013. Members of the Retirement Plans Committee are Daniel K. Frierson, Chairman, D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr., and Hilda S. Murray. The Retirement Plans Committee administers the Company’s retirement plans. The Retirement Plans Committee met one (1) time in 2013. Members of the Compensation Committee are Lowry F. Kline, Chairman, Charles E. Brock, Walter W. Hubbard, and John W. Murrey, III. The Compensation Committee administers the Company’s compensation plans, reviews and may establish the compensation of the Company’s officers, and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning such compensation and related matters. The Compensation Committee acts pursuant to a written Charter adopted by the Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee may request recommendations from the Company’s management concerning the types and levels of compensation to be paid to the Company’s executive officers. Additionally, the Compensation Committee is authorized to engage compensation consultants and may review and consider information and recommendations of compensation consultants otherwise engaged by the Company or the Board of Directors in connection with the assessment, review and structuring of compensation plans and compensation levels. For a description of the Compensation Committee actions with respect to Compensation of Executive Officers in 2013, see Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Compensation for 2013. Annually, the Compensation Committee reviews the performance of the Chief Executive Officer against goals and objectives established by the Committee as part of the process of determining his compensation. The Compensation Committee reports to the Board on its performance review. In addition to its responsibilities with respect to executive and director compensation, the Compensation Committee discharges responsibilities with respect to corporate governance. In that capacity, the Compensation Committee develops and, recommends for board approval, corporate governance guidelines. The Compensation Committee’s Charter also includes the duties of a nominating committee. Only nominees approved by a majority of the Compensation Committee are recommended to the full Board. In selecting and approving director nominees, the independent directors that make up the Committee consider, among other factors, the existing composition of the Board and the mix of Board members appropriate for the perceived needs of the Company. The Compensation Committee believes continuity in leadership and board tenure increase the Board’s ability to exercise meaningful board oversight. Because qualified incumbent directors provide stockholders the benefit of continuity of leadership and seasoned judgment gained through experience as a director of the Company, the Compensation Committee will generally give priority as potential candidates to those incumbent directors interested in standing for re-election who have satisfied director performance expectations, including regular attendance at, preparation for and meaningful participation in Board and committee meetings. The Compensation Committee also considers the following in selecting the proposed nominee slate: • • • at all times, at least a majority of directors must be “independent” in the opinion of the Board as determined in accordance with NASDAQ standards; at all times at least three members of the Board must satisfy heightened standards of independence for Audit Committee members; and at all times the Board should have at least one member who satisfies the criteria to be designated by the Board as an “audit committee financial expert.” In selecting the current slate of director nominees, the Committee considered overall qualifications and the requirements of the make up of the Board of Directors rather than addressing separate topics such as diversity in its selection. The Board considered the value of the incumbents’ familiarity with the Company and its business as well as the considerations outlined above under the heading Considerations with Respect to Nominees. The Compensation Committee met three (3) times in 2013. Nominations for Director - Stockholder Recommendations 11 Generally, the Board will consider stockholder recommendations of proposed director nominees if such recommendations are timely received. To be timely for next year’s annual meeting, recommendations must be received in writing at the principal executive offices of the Company no later than November 22, 2014. In addition, any stockholder director nominee recommendation must include the following information: • • • • the proposed nominee’s name and qualifications and the reason for such recommendation; the name and record address of the stockholder(s) proposing such nominee; the number of shares of stock of the Company which are beneficially owned by such stockholder(s); and a description of any financial or other relationship between the stockholder(s) and such nominee or between the nominee and the Company or any of its subsidiaries. In order to be considered by the Board, any candidate proposed by one or more stockholders will also be required to submit appropriate biographical and other information equivalent to that required of all other director candidates. Board Leadership Structure Mr. Daniel K. Frierson currently serves as the Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The positions of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board are combined. Executive sessions of the Board are chaired by the chairman of the Compensation Committee, Lowry Kline, who, as noted above, has extensive management and Board experience independent of his experience with the Company. Mr. Kline and the independent directors set their own agenda for meetings in executive session and may consider any topic relevant to the Company and its business. The Company believes that regular, periodic, meetings held in executive session, in the absence of management members or management directors, provide the Board an adequate opportunity to review and address issues affecting management or the Company that require an independent perspective. Additionally, the Company’s Audit Committee holds separate executive sessions with the Company’s independent registered public accounts, internal auditor and management. This Committee also sets its own agenda and may consider any relevant topic in its executive sessions. Director Attendance During 2013, no director attended fewer than 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors and any Committee of the Board of Directors on which he served. All directors are invited and encouraged to attend the annual meeting of shareholders. In general, all directors attend the annual meeting of shareholders unless they are unable to do so due to unavoidable commitments or intervening events. Eight (8) of the nine incumbent directors attended the 2013 annual meeting of shareholders. Director Compensation Directors who are employees of the Company do not receive any additional compensation for their services as members of the Board of Directors. Non-employee directors receive an annual retainer of $24,000, payable one-half in cash and one-half in value of Performance Units under the Directors Stock Plan. Performance Units are redeemable upon a director’s retirement for an equivalent number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock, and the number of units issued is determined generally by the market value of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of grant of the units. In addition to the annual retainer, directors who are not employees of the Company receive $1,500 for each Board meeting attended and $1,000 for each committee meeting attended ($1,500 for the Committee Chairman). Fees for attending telephonic meetings are one-half those for in-person meetings, such that each non-employee director receives $750 per telephonic board meeting and $500 per committee meeting ($750 for the Chairman of the Committee). For an additional discussion of Director Compensation, see the tabular information below under the heading, “Director Compensation.” Independent Directors The Board has determined that Charles E. Brock, Dr. J. Don Brock, Walter W. Hubbard, Lowry F. Kline, Hilda S. Murray, John W. Murrey, III, and Michael L. Owens are independent within the meaning of the standards for independence set forth in the Company’s corporate governance guidelines, which are consistent with the applicable Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules and NASDAQ standards. Executive Sessions of the Independent Directors The Company’s independent directors meet in executive session at each regularly scheduled quarterly meeting of the Board, with the chair of the Compensation Committee serving as chair of such executive sessions. 12 Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and regulations of the SEC thereunder, require the Company’s executive officers and directors and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of the Company’s Common Stock, as well as certain affiliates of such persons, to file initial reports of such ownership and monthly transaction reports covering any changes in such ownership with the SEC and the National Association of Securities Dealers. Executive officers, directors and persons owning more than 10% of the Company’s Common Stock are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company with all such reports they file. Based on its review of the copies of such reports received by it, the Company believes that, during fiscal year 2013, all filing requirements applicable to its executive officers, directors, and owners of more than 10% of the Company’s Common Stock were complied with, with the exception of one filing for W. Derek Davis, which was inadvertently filed one day late. Management Succession Periodically, the Board reviews a succession plan, developed by management, addressing the policies and principles for selecting successors to the Company’s executive officers, including the Company’s CEO. The succession plan includes an assessment of the experience, performance and skills believed to be desirable for possible successors to the Company’s executive officers. Certain Transactions Between the Company and Directors and Officers The Company’s Compensation Committee has adopted written policies and procedures concerning the review, approval or ratification of all transactions required to be disclosed under the SEC’s Regulation S-K, Rule 404. These policies and procedures cover all related party transactions required to be disclosed under the SEC’s rules as well as all material conflict of interest transactions as defined by relevant state law and the rules and regulations of NASDAQ that are applicable to the Company, and require that all such transactions be identified by management and disclosed to the Company’s Compensation Committee for review. If required and appropriate under the circumstances, the Compensation Committee will consider such transactions for approval or ratification. Full disclosure of the material terms of any such transaction must be made to the Compensation Committee, including: • • • the parties to the transaction and their relationship to the Company, its directors and officers; the terms of the transaction, including all proposed periodic payments; and the direct or indirect interest of any related parties or any director, officer or associate in the transaction. To be approved or ratified, the Compensation Committee must find any such transaction to be fair to the Company. Prior approval of such transactions must be obtained generally, if they are material to the Company. If such transactions are immaterial, such transactions may be ratified and prior approval is not required. Ordinary employment transactions may be ratified. Certain Related Party Transactions During its fiscal year ended December 28, 2013, the Company purchased a portion of its products needs in the form of fiber, yarn, carpet and dyeing services from Engineered Floors, and its subsidiary Bentley Dye Services, an entity substantially controlled by Robert E. Shaw, a shareholder of the Company. Mr. Shaw has reported holding approximately 10.2% of the Company’s Common Stock, which, as of year-end, represented approximately 4.1% of the total vote of all classes of the Company’s Common Stock. Engineered Floors is one of several suppliers of such services to the Company. Total purchases from Engineered Floors (including Bentley Dye Services) for 2013 were approximately $12.1 million; or approximately 8.4% of all the Company’s comparable purchases in 2013. In accordance with the terms of its charter, the Compensation Committee reviewed the Company’s supply relationship with Engineered Floors. The dollar value of Mr. Shaw’s interest in the transactions with Engineered Floors is not known to the Company. REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is composed of seven members, each of whom is an independent, non- employee director. The Audit Committee operates under a written Audit Committee Charter adopted and approved by the Board of Directors. The Charter is reviewed at least annually by the Committee. While the Committee has the responsibilities and powers set forth in its written charter, it is not the duty of the Committee to plan or conduct audits. This function is conducted by the Company’s management and its independent registered public accountants. The Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the audited financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 28, 2013 (the “Audited Financial Statements”). In addition, the Committee has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP the matters required by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, “Communications with Audit Committees” (SAS 61), as amended and as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) in Rule 3200T. 13 The Committee also has received the written report, disclosure and the letter from Ernst & Young LLP required by PCAOB Rule 3526, “Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence”, and the Committee has reviewed, evaluated, and discussed with that firm the written report and its independence from the Company. The Committee also has discussed with management of the Company and Ernst & Young LLP such other matters and received such assurances from them as the Committee deemed appropriate. On November 11, 2013, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors confirmed its engagement of Ernst & Young LLP (“E&Y”) to audit the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ending December 28, 2013, and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 28, 2013. Upon completion of all procedures related to filing the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2013, the engagement of E&Y will end. At that time, the Committee approved the engagement of Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP to serve as independent registered public accountants for the Company for fiscal 2014. During the fiscal years ended December 28, 2013 and December 29, 2012, Ernst & Young’s reports on the Registrant’s financial statements did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. During the fiscal years ended December 28, 2013 and December 29, 2012 and the subsequent periods through the date of this report, (i) there were no disagreements between the Registrant and Ernst & Young on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Ernst & Young, would have caused Ernst & Young to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with its reports on the Registrant’s financial statements, and (ii) there were no reportable events as that term is described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K. During the two most recent fiscal years and through the date of this report, neither the Registrant nor anyone on its behalf consulted with Dixon Hughes Goodman regarding any of the following: (i) (ii) The application of accounting principles to a specific transaction, either completed or proposed; The type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Registrant’s financial statements, and none of the following was provided to the Registrant: (a) a written report; or (b) oral advice that Dixon Hughes Goodman concluded was an important factor considered by the Registrant in reaching a decision as to an accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or (iii) Any matter that was subject of a disagreement, as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K, or a reportable event, as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K. Based on the foregoing review and discussions and relying thereon, the Committee has recommended to the Company’s Board of Directors the inclusion of the Company’s Audited Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2013, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. THE AUDIT COMMITTEE John W. Murrey, III, Chairman Charles E. Brock Dr. J. Don Brock Walter W. Hubbard Lowry F. Kline Hilda S. Murray Michael L. Owens AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT The Board has determined that John W. Murrey, III is an audit committee financial expert as defined by Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is independent within the meaning of Rule 10A-3(b)(l) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. For a brief list of Mr. Murrey’s relevant experience, please refer to Mr. Murrey’s biographical information as set forth in the Election of Directors section of this proxy statement. 14 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS The Compensation Committee sets compensation for the Company’s executive officers, and its decisions are reported to and reviewed by the Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee currently consists of four independent directors chosen annually by the Board. Compensation of the Company’s executive officers is intended to be competitive with compensation offered by other companies generally similar to the Company in size and lines of business. In determining what types and levels of compensation to offer, the Committee may review relevant, publicly available data and, from time to time, it may receive advice and information from professional compensation consultants. The Elements of Executive Officer Compensation Compensation for each of the Company’s executive officers consists generally of base salary, retirement plan benefits and other customary employment benefits, as well as potential cash incentive awards and stock plan awards pursuant to an annual incentive plan reviewed and adopted by the Committee at the beginning of each year. The annual incentive plan is customarily structured so that a significant portion of each executive’s potential, annual compensation may consist of equity awards, the value of which is tied to increases in the value of the Company’s common stock. Compensation for 2013. Effective February 14, 2013, the Compensation committee selected performance goals and a range of possible incentives for the Company’s 2013 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2013 Plan”). Pursuant to the 2013 Plan, each executive officer had the opportunity to earn a Cash Incentive Award, a Primary Long-Term Incentive Award of restricted stock, and an award of restricted stock denominated as “Career Shares.” The potential range of cash incentives and conditions to vesting of the restricted stock awards are described below. For 2013, each executive officer also received customary retirement plan benefits and other customary employment benefits, as in prior years. Salary for 2013. The base salaries for the executive officers were adjusted on August 1, 2013. The current salaries are: Mr. Daniel K. Frierson - $625,000; Mr. D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr. - $320,000; Mr. Paul C. Comiskey - $300,000; Mr. Jon A. Faulkner - $270,000 and Mr. W. Derek Davis - $230,000. See the 2013 Summary Compensation Table for an explanation of the amount of salary and other compensation elements in proportion to total compensation. Potential Incentive Awards. The CEO and all executive officers whose responsibilities primarily relate to corporate level administration had the opportunity to earn a cash payment ranging from 15% to no more than 75% of such executive’s base salary. Forty percent of the amount of the potential award was based on achievement of specified levels of operating income from continuing operations for the Company’s residential business operations, as adjusted for unusual items, 40% of the amount was based on achievement of specified levels of the Company’s consolidated operating income, as adjusted for unusual items, and 20% of the amount was based on achievement of specified levels of the Company’s commercial business operating income, as adjusted for unusual items. Executive officers whose responsibilities primarily relate to one of the Company’s business units, had the opportunity to earn a cash payment ranging from 15% to no more than 75% of such participant’s base salary. Fifty percent of the amount was based on achievement of specified levels of their annual business unit operating income, as adjusted for unusual items, 25% was based on the achievement of specified levels of the Company’s consolidated operating income, as adjusted for unusual items, and 25% was based on achievement of specified levels of the annual operating income of the Company’s other business units, as adjusted for unusual items. The Compensation Committee retained the discretion to reduce any award by up to 30% of the amount otherwise earned based on the participant’s failure to achieve individual performance goals set by the committee. The Committee also retained discretion to eliminate unusual items from its assessment of whether specified operating income levels were achieved. Primary Long-Term Incentive Share Awards and Career Shares Awards. The incentive plan provided for two possible awards of restricted stock: Primary Long-Term Incentive Share Awards and Career Share Awards. Receipt of the Primary Long- Term Incentive Share Awards and Career Share Awards were made contingent on the Company’s achievement of minimum adjusted levels of operating income and, in the case of Career Share Awards, improvement in operating income levels as adjusted. Awards were granted in 2014 for 2013, as described more fully below and in the footnotes to the accompanying tables. The Primary Long-Term Incentive Share Award was designed as a possible award of restricted shares, in value equal to no more than 35% of the executive’s base salary as of the beginning of 2013 plus any cash incentive award paid for such year. The Primary Long-Term Incentive Share Awards vest ratably over three years. Career Shares were designed as a possible award of restricted stock valued at 20% of each executive officer’s base salary as of the beginning of the year. In accordance with past practice, any such award, if earned, would be granted in 2014. The Career 15 Share Awards granted in 2014 with respect to 2013 vest when the participant becomes (i) qualified to retire from the Company and (ii) has retained such shares for 24 months following the grant date. Awards granted to a participant who is age 60 or is already age 60 or older, vest ratably over the stated vesting or retention period of such awards. Additionally, Career Share Awards are subject to accelerated vesting or forfeiture under certain conditions as follows: death, disability or a change in control will result in immediate vesting of Career Share Awards; termination without cause will also result in immediate vesting of Career Share Awards; voluntary termination of employment prior to retirement, or termination for cause will result in forfeiture of all unvested awards; upon retirement, vesting will accelerate to the extent that the Company has recognized compensation expense related to the shares subject to the awards. 2014 Awards. Cash Awards were made to the following named executive officers in 2014 for 2013: Mr. Daniel K. Frierson - $326,650, Mr. D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr. - $148,532, Mr. Paul B. Comiskey - $151,174, Mr. W. Derek Davis - $120,810 and Mr. Jon A. Faulkner - $127,003. Primary Long-Term Incentive Share Awards were granted in 2014 with respect to 2013 for the following named executive officers: Mr. Daniel K. Frierson - 22,586 shares, Mr. D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr. - 10,407 shares, Mr. Paul B. Comiskey - 10,219 shares, Mr. W. Derek Davis - 8,299 shares and Mr. Jon A. Faulkner - 8,839 shares. Career Share Awards were granted in 2014 with respect to 2013 for the following named executive officers: Mr. Daniel K. Frierson - 8.151 shares, Mr. D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr. - 3,785 shares, Mr. Paul B. Comiskey - 3,639. Mr. W. Derek Davis - 2,984 shares and Mr. Jon A. Faulkner - 3,202 shares. The 2014 Incentive Compensation Plan. Following year-end, the Committee adopted changes to the incentive plan for 2014. The plan is similar in structure to the plan adopted for 2013, as described in detail above; however, the percentage weight given to operating income achievement levels was adjusted to 50%, 30% and 20%, respectively, for Company, Residential and Contract business unit results with respect to the CEO and corporate level officers, and 55%, 30%, and 15%, respectively, for business unit, Company, and other business unit results, with respect to officers whose primary responsibility relates to one of the Company’s business units. Additionally, for 2014 the highest possible incentive award level is adjusted to a maximum of 105% of executive compensation, and the level of career share awards is increased to 35% and 30%, respectively, of the Chief Operating Officer’s and Chief Financial Officer’s base salary, with vesting of such awards occurring ratably over 5 years beginning on the participant’s 61st birthday. Retirement Plans and Other Benefits. The Company’s compensation for its executive officers also includes the opportunity to participate in two retirement plans, one qualified and one non-qualified for federal tax purposes, and certain health insurance, life insurance, relocation allowances, and other benefits. Such benefits are designed to be similar to the benefits available to other exempt, salaried associates of the Company, and to be comparable to and competitive with benefits offered by businesses with which the Company competes for executive talent. Executive officers may elect to contribute a limited amount of their compensation to the qualified plan and make deferrals into the non-qualified plan (up to 90% of total compensation). Although the plans permit the Company to make discretionary contributions in an aggregate amount equal to up to 3% of the executive officer’s cash compensation, for 2013 the Company made a contribution of 2% to the qualified plan, while no Company contributions were made to the non-qualified plan. Compensation Considerations for 2013. The tax effect of possible forms of compensation on the Company and on the executive officers is a factor considered in determining types of compensation to be awarded. Similarly, the accounting treatment accorded various types of compensation may be an important factor used to determine the form of compensation. For 2013, the Committee considered the tax effects of the possible grant of cash incentives and equity incentive awards that may not qualify as “incentive compensation” under Section 162m of the Internal Revenue Code and concluded that no executive would have compensation that exceeded the applicable threshold. The Company held its first “Say on Pay” vote at its annual meeting in 2013. At that meeting approximately 99% of the votes cast were “For” approval of our executive compensation as described in the Proxy Statement for that meeting. The Committee intends to consider these results as part of its ongoing review of executive compensation. Termination Benefits. The Company’s restricted stock awards provide for acceleration of vesting of awards under certain circumstances upon termination of the participant’s employment. Upon retirement of a Participant, all Long-Term Incentive Plan and Career Share restricted stock awards vest to the extent such awards have been expensed in the Company’s financial statements. As of year-end, Daniel K. Frierson, Paul B. Comiskey and W. Derek Davis were the only Named Executive Officers eligible for retirement in accordance with the terms of the restricted stock awards. If Mr. Frierson had retired at year end, the number of shares subject to such awards that would have vested and the value of such shares would have been 64,558 shares and $718,004. If Mr. Comiskey had retired at year end, the number of shares subject to such awards that would have vested and the value of such shares would have been 27,658 shares and $311,096. If Mr. Davis had retired at year end, the number of shares subject to such awards that would have vested and the value of such shares would have been 19,733 shares and $235,447. For purposes of valuing the foregoing awards, the Company used the year-end market value of the Company’s Common Stock, which was $12.09/share. Vesting of the restricted stock award made in 2006 to Mr. Frierson of 119,873 shares of Class B Common Stock and 5,127 shares of Common Stock is contingent, in all events other than a change-in-control, on meeting the market condition of the award prior to June 6, 2014. 16 No termination benefit was paid to or accrued for any executive officer named in the accompanying tables in the fiscal year ended December 28, 2013. Compensation Committee Report The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, set forth above, with management. Based on our review and the discussions we held with management, we have recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’s Proxy Materials. Respectfully submitted, Lowry F. Kline, Chairman Charles E. Brock Walter W. Hubbard John W. Murrey, III EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION INFORMATION The following table sets forth information as to all compensation earned during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011, and December 29, 2012 and December 28, 2013 to (i) the Company's Chief Executive Officer; and (ii) the Company's Chief Financial Officer, and (iii) the three other most highly compensated executive officers who served as such during the fiscal year ended December 28, 2013 (the “Named Executive Officers”). For a more complete discussion of the elements of executive compensation, this information should be read in conjunction with the other tabular information presented in the balance of this section. Summary Compensation Table Name and Principal Position (a) Year (b) Salary ($) (c)(1) Bonus ($) (d)(2) Stock Awards ($) (e)(3) Option Awards ($) (f) Nonqualified Compensation Earnings ($) (h)(4) All Other Compensation ($) (i)(5) Total $)(j) Daniel K Frierson Chief Executive Officer 2013 2012 587,083 104,592 288,720 560,000 109,072 286,290 2011 556,500 — 102,256 D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr. Chief Operating Officer 2013 2012 285,000 260,000 47,549 133,783 50,641 132,917 2011 260,000 — 47,476 Paul B. Comiskey Vice President, President Residential 2013 2012 270,833 250,000 44,643 128,359 47,038 127,331 2011 250,000 — 45,650 Jon A. Faulkner, Chief Financial Officer 2013 2012 240,833 220,000 41,090 113,427 43,301 112,602 2011 219,646 — 40,172 W. Derek Davis, Vice President, Human Resources 2013 2012 215,417 205,000 39,883 106,104 40,769 105,047 2011 204,146 — 37,433 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — (1) Includes all amounts deferred at the election of the Named Executive Officer. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 17 2,879 2,879 2,879 2,224 2,056 2,056 2,419 2,274 2,274 1,918 1,780 1,780 1,964 1,780 1,780 983,274 958,241 661,635 468,556 445,614 309,532 446,254 426,643 297,924 397,268 377,683 261,598 363,368 352,596 243,359 (2) Cash incentives awarded for 2013 performance are described in the 2014 Awards section of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Cash bonuses are shown in the year granted, not earned, because continued employment is a condition of earning the award. No cash incentive was earned in 2011. (3) Amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 for the year presented of stock awards to the Named Executive Officers. (4) The Dixie Group does not provide above-market or preferential earnings on deferred compensation. The Named Executive Officers did not participate in any defined benefit or actuarial pension plans for the periods presented. (5) The following table is a summary and quantification of all amounts included in column (i) All Other Compensation Name (a) Year (b) Registrant Contributions to Defined Contributions Plans ($)(c) Insurance Premiums ($)(d) Other ($)(f) Total Perquisites and Other Benefits ($)(g)(1) Daniel K. Frierson D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr. Paul B. Comiskey Jon A. Faulkner W. Derek Davis 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2,879 2,879 2,879 2,224 2,056 2,056 2,419 2,274 2,274 1,918 1,780 1,780 1,964 1,780 1,780 2,879 2,879 2,879 2,224 2,056 2,056 2,419 2,274 2,274 1,918 1,780 1,780 1,964 1,780 1,780 (1) No named Executive Officer received any tax reimbursement, discounted securities purchases, or payment or accrual on termination plans for the period presented. 18 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1) Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards Name (a) Grant Date (b) Threshold ($) or (#) (c) Target ($) or (#) (d) Maximum ($) or (#) (e) Shares of Stock or Units (#) (i) Securities Underlying Options (#) (j) Base Price of Option ($) or (#) (k) Daniel K. Frierson 3/12/2013 D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr. 3/12/2013 Paul B. Comiskey 3/12/2013 Jon A. Faulkner 3/12/2013 W. Derek Davis 3/12/2013 55,630 25,777 24,732 21,855 20,444 Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($) 288,720 133,783 128,359 113,427 106,104 (1) The amount set forth in the table reflects the grant date fair value of the award determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, with respect to the awards granted February 12, 2013. All awards of restricted stock made to the Named Executive Officers under the 2013 Incentive Compensation Plan were granted in 2014, in accordance with the terms of the plan. Such awards are as follows: Name Daniel K. Frierson* D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr.* Paul B. Comiskey Jon A. Faulkner W. Derek Davis Long-Term Incentive Award Shares Career Shares Total Shares 22,586 10,407 10,219 8,839 8,299 8,151 3,785 3,639 3,202 2,984 30,737 14,192 13,858 12,041 11,283 *Pursuant to Mr. Daniel K. Frierson’s election, 18,442 shares of the total of his awards were granted as shares of Class B Common Stock and pursuant to Mr. D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr.'s election, 13,567 shares of the total of his awards were granted as Class B Common Stock. 19 Name (a) Daniel K. Frierson D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr. Paul B. Comiskey Jon A. Faulkner W. Derek Davis Option Exercises and Stock Vested Option Awards Stock Awards Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)(b) Value Realized on Exercise ($)(c) Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)(d) Value Realized on Vesting ($)(e)(1) — — — — — — 38,012 202,808 7,248 38,414 10,000 41,700 9,000 64,740 6,144 32,563 10,000 56,000 13,935 74,348 (1) The value realized is calculated as the closing price on the relevant vesting date times the number of vested shares. The following table sets forth information concerning the Company’s Non-Qualified Defined Contribution Plan for each of the Named Executive Officers for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2013. The Company does not maintain any other non-tax qualified deferred compensation plans. There were no withdrawals or distributions by or to the Named Executive Officers in the fiscal year ended 2013. Name (a) Daniel K. Frierson D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr. Paul B. Comiskey Jon A. Faulkner W. Derek Davis Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Executive Contribution in Last FY ($) (1)(b) Registrant Contribution in Last FY ($) (c) Aggregate Earnings in Last FY ($) (2)(d) Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($)(e) Aggregate Balance at Last FYE ($) (3)(f) 39,813 26,610 — 62,660 — — — — — — 511,535 81,412 8,279 192,613 2,387 — — — — — 1,869,223 323,191 34,631 915,147 8,387 (1) For each of the named executive officers, the entire amount reported in this column (c) is included within the amount report in column (c) of the 2013 Summary Compensation Table. (2) None of the amounts reported in this column (d) are reported in column (h) of the 2013 Summary Compensation Table because the Company does not pay guaranteed, above-market or preferential earnings on deferred compensation. (3) Amounts reported in this column (f) for each named executive officer include amounts previously reported in the Company's Summary Compensation Table last year when earned if that officer's compensation was required to be disclosed in the previous year. This total reflects the cumulative value of each named executive officer's deferrals and investment experience. 20 The following table sets forth information concerning outstanding equity awards for each of the Named Executive Officers at fiscal year-end. Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Option Awards Stock Awards Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Option (#)(d) Option Exercise Price ($) (e) Option Expiration Date (f) Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) (g)(1) Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock Held That Have Not Vested($)(h) Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)(i)(2) Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(j)(2) Name (a) Exercisable (#)(b) Unexercisable (#)(c) Daniel K. Frierson 125,000 1,511,250 98,053 1,185,461 D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr. Paul B. Comiskey Jon A. Faulkner W. Derek Davis 44,287 5,000 50,000 31,290 60,000 37,500 12,000 4,113 1,887 20,000 16,500 — — — — — — — 6.96 4.78 5/2/2015 8/12/2015 — 11.85 8/5/2014 — 15.98 12/6/2014 — 13.51 12/20/2015 12,500 5.00 11/4/2019 — — — — 5,500 12.56 17.58 15.98 4/20/2014 12/6/2014 12/6/2014 13.51 12/20/2015 5.00 11/4/2019 13,500 4,500 5.00 11/4/2019 15,000 4,098 3,102 15,000 8,250 10,000 5,510 1,160 15,000 1,875 — — — — 2,750 — — — — 625 4.60 15.98 15.98 2/5/2015 12/6/2014 12/6/2014 13.51 12/20/2015 5.00 11/4/2019 11.85 15.98 15.98 8/5/2014 12/6/2014 12/6/2014 13.51 12/20/2015 5.00 11/4/2019 — — 78,419 948,086 — — — 43,594 527,051 — 68,688 830,438 — — 36,016 435,397 (1) 125,000 shares of restricted stock were awarded to the Chief Executive Officer on June 6, 2006, under the Company’s 2006 Stock Awards Plan. Such award consisted of 119,873 shares of Class B Common Stock and 5,127 shares of Common Stock. Vesting of the Award is subject to both a service and a market condition. Pursuant to the terms of the award, Mr. Frierson has the right to any dividends declared and paid on such shares and the right to vote such shares from the date of grant. 21 (2) The market value of the restricted stock set forth in the table has been calculated by multiplying the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock at year-end ($12.09/share) by the number of shares of unvested restricted stock subject to the award. Set forth below is a table presenting compensation information with respect to all non-employee directors of the Company. Compensation information for the Company's Chief Executive Officer, Daniel K. Frierson, and the Company's Chief Operating Officer, D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr. is reported in the Summary Compensation Table appearing elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. DIRECTOR COMPENSATION Name (a) Fees earned or paid in cash ($) (b)(1) Stock Awards ($) (c)(2) Option Awards ($) (d) All Other Compensation ($) (e)(3) Total ($)(4) Charles E. Brock 25,000 12,000 J. Don Brock, Ph. D. 21,750 12,000 Paul K. Frierson 4,750 — Walter W. Hubbard 25,500 12,000 Lowry F. Kline 28,000 12,000 Hilda S. Murray 23,750 12,000 John W. Murrey 27,500 12,000 — — — — — — — — — 37,000 33,750 10,430 15,180 — — — — 37,500 40,000 35,750 39,500 (1) Directors who are employees of the Company do not receive any additional compensation for their services as members of the Board of Directors. Non-employee directors receive an annual retainer of $24,000, payable $12,000 in cash and the remainder in Performance Units (subject, for payments made in 2011, 2012 and 2013, to a $5.00 minimum value per unit) under the Directors Stock Plan. In addition to the annual retainer, directors who are not employees of the Company received $1,500 for each Board meeting attended and $1,000 for each committee meeting attended ($1,500 for the Committee Chairman). Fees for attending telephonic meetings are one-half those for in-person meetings, such that each non-employee director receives $750 per telephonic board meeting and $500 per committee meeting ($750 for Chairman of the Committee). Additionally, directors receive reimbursement of the expenses they incur in attending all board and committee meetings. (2) The value presented is the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The value of the Performance Units awarded to each non-employee director under the Directors Stock Plan in 2013 was $9,312. (3) This represents Mr. Paul K. Frierson's commissions prior to his retirement on April 30, 2013. 22 At fiscal year-end, each non-employee director held the following outstanding equity awards: Name (a) Charles E. Brock Stock Options (2) Performance Units (#)(b)(1) Number of Securities Underlying Options (c) Option Exercise Price ($)(d) Option Expiration Date(e) 4,380 — — — J. Don Brock, Ph. D. 29,550 2,500 3,000 4,000 12.18 15.98 13.51 2/19/2014 12/6/2014 12/20/2015 Walter W. Hubbard Lowry F. Kline Hilda S. Murray John W. Murrey, III 15,240 8,000 13.51 12/20/2015 16,540 10,000 3,000 4,000 12.63 15.98 13.51 5/6/2014 12/6/2014 12/20/2015 4,380 — — — 29,550 2,500 3,000 4,000 12.18 15.98 13.51 2/19/2014 12/6/2014 12/20/2015 (1) The performance units represent an equal number of shares of the Company's Common Stock. At year-end, the aggregate value of such stock was $ 1,204,648, determined by multiplying the number of performance units by the year-end per share market value of the Company's Common Stock ($12.09/share). (2) All such options are presently exercisable. 23 SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR INCLUSION IN NEXT YEAR'S PROXY STATEMENT In the event any shareholder wishes to present a proposal at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, such proposal must be received by the Company on or before November 21, 2014, to be considered for inclusion in the Company's proxy materials. All shareholder proposals should be addressed to the Company at its principal executive offices, P.O. Box 25107, Chattanooga, Tennessee 37422-5107, Attention: Corporate Secretary, and must comply with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Shareholders who wish to communicate with members of the Board, including the independent directors individually or as a group, may send correspondence to them in care of the Secretary at the Company’s corporate headquarters, 104 Nowlin Lane, Suite 101, Chattanooga, TN 37421. PROPOSAL TWO TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE MATERIAL TERMS OF THE PERFORMANCE GOALS OF THE ANNUAL INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN APPLICABLE TO 2014 - 2018. The Company seeks generally to preserve its ability to claim tax deductions for compensation paid to its executive officers. Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (the code) sets limits on deductibility for compensation paid to (i) the Chief Executive Officer and (ii) the other most highly compensated executive officers whose compensation is reported in the Summary Compensation Table (covered employees). “Qualified performance based compensation”, as defined in the Code, (which can include compensation from stock options, SARS, stock units, stock payments, cash awards and grants of restricted stock) is not subject to the applicable deductibility limits if certain conditions are met. One of the conditions is shareholder approval of the material terms of the performance goals under which compensation is paid. On March 5, 2014, the Compensation Committee approved the material terms of the Annual Incentive Compensation Plan applicable to 2014 - 2018. The material terms of the performance goals upon which awards may be based are being submitted to you for shareholder approval at the Annual Meeting, in order to allow awards granted under the plan to satisfy the requirements for “qualified performance-based compensation” under the Code, thereby allowing the company to take a federal income tax deduction for the related compensation expense notwithstanding the limitations of Section 162(m). Material Terms of the Performance Goals Under the Annual Incentive Compensation Plan applicable to 2014 - 2018, cash incentive and stock based incentive awards may be granted based on achievement of the plan’s performance goals. The stock based incentive awards consist of Long Term Incentive Share Awards and Career Share Awards, as described above under the heading Primary Long Term Incentive Share Awards and Career Share Awards. The material terms of the performance goals for such awards consist of: (i) the class of employees eligible to receive the awards (eligible employees); (ii) the performance criteria on which goals are based (performance criteria); and (iii) the maximum payout of an award that can be provided to any employee and to all covered employees under the plan during a specified period (maximum payout). Eligible Employees All covered employees and any additional key executives chosen by the compensation committee are eligible to receive awards under the plan. This group is comprised of approximately 20 individuals. Performance Criteria-2014 - 2018 The performance Criteria related to awards under the Annual Incentive Compensation Plan applicable to 2014 - 2018, include the following measures: minimum levels of corporate (Company) and business unit Operating Income, as adjusted for specific and unusual items, and a minimum level of profitability (with respect to Career Share Awards). Cash Incentive Awards The Cash Incentive Award component is equal to a range of from 15% to a maximum of 105% of base salary as of the beginning of the year. The percentage weight given to Operating Income achievement levels was set at 50%, 30% and 20%, respectively, for Company, residential, and contract business unit results to determine the cash incentive for the Chief Executive Officer and all other participants whose primary responsibility is at the corporate level. 24 The percentage weight given to Operating Income achievement levels was set at 55%, 30% and 15%, respectively, for business unit, Company, and other business unit results, to determine the cash incentive for officers whose primary responsibility relates to one of the Company’s business units. Share Based Awards The plan also provides that each participant may earn a restricted stock award consisting of Long Term Incentive Shares and Career Shares. Vesting of the restricted share awards of Long Term Incentive Shares and Career Shares is as described above for 2013, except in the case of the Company’s Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer whose Career Share Awards for 2014, if received, will vest ratably over 5 years from the individual’s 61st birthday. Maximum Payout The maximum Annual Cash Incentive Award that could be paid to any one participant for 2014 - 2018 is $750,000 and the maximum amount of cash awards that can be paid to all covered employees is $2,500,000. The maximum Annual value of stock based awards that could be issued to any one participant in would be $650,000 and the maximum value of stock awards that could be issued to all covered employees would be $2,500,000. General The Compensation Committee has the authority to establish, review and certify achievement of the performance criteria and to administer and interpret the Incentive Compensation Plan. The plan also provides that the Committee may, in its discretion, reduce, but not increase, any participant’s award (by an amount equal to up to 30% of such award) based on subjective criteria related to the individuals’ performance during the year. In accordance with past practice, determination of whether and to what extent awards under the plan applicable to 2014 will be granted, will be made by the Compensation Committee during the first quarter of 2015. The affirmative vote of a majority of the total votes cast that are represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting is necessary for approval of the material terms of the performance goals for the plan. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be treated as negative votes in determining whether a majority of the total votes cast has been obtained. The board of Directors recommends that the Company’s shareholders vote FOR approval of the material terms of the Performance Goals of the Annual Incentive Compensation Plan applicable to 2014 - 2018. PROPOSAL THREE ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION As required under recent amendments to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, our stockholders may cast an advisory vote on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, as described in this proxy statement. Our executive compensation programs are designed to attract, motivate, and retain our Named Executive Officers, who are critical to our success. Please read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for additional details about our executive compensation programs, including information about the fiscal 2013 compensation of our Named Executive Officers. We are asking our Shareholders to indicate their support for our Named Executive Officer compensation as described in this proxy statement. This proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, gives our stockholders the opportunity to express their views on our Named Executive Officers’ compensation. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our Named Executive Officers and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this proxy statement. We recommend that stockholders vote, on an advisory basis, “FOR” the following resolution: “RESOLVED, that the Company’s stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, as discussed and disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the executive compensation tables and related narrative executive compensation disclosure in this proxy statement.” The above resolution will be deemed to be approved if it receives the affirmative vote of a majority of the total votes cast on Proposal Three at the annual meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not considered to be votes cast and, accordingly, will have no effect on the outcome of the vote. As this vote is an advisory vote, the outcome is not binding on us with respect to future executive compensation decisions, including those relating to our named executive officers. Our Board of Directors and our Compensation Committee, however, value the opinions of our stockholders, and to the extent there is any significant vote against the Named Executive Officer compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement, the Compensation Committee will consider our stockholders’ concerns and will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns. 25 THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF PROPOSAL THREE. PROPOSAL FOUR RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS FOR 2013 The firm of Ernst & Young LLP served as independent registered public accountants for the Company for fiscal year 2013. Subject to ratification of its decision by the Company’s shareholders, the Company has selected the firm of Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP to serve as its independent registered public accountants for its 2014 fiscal year. A representative of Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement if he so desires and to respond to appropriate questions from shareholders. Representatives of Ernst & Young and Dixon Hughes Goodman will be available to make a statement and answer questions either in person or by telephone. The Board of Directors recommends that you vote in favor of Proposal Three. In the event that the Company’s shareholders do not ratify the selection of Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP as independent registered public accountants for fiscal 2014, the Board of Directors will consider other alternatives, including appointment of another firm to serve as independent registered public accountants for fiscal 2014. AUDIT FEES DISCUSSION The following table sets forth the fees paid to Ernst & Young LLP for services provided during fiscal years 2012 and 2013: Total Audit Fees (1) 2013 2012 $791,461 $563,775 (1) Represents fees for professional services provided in connection with the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements, and audit of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting during the 2013, review of the Company’s quarterly financial statements, review of other SEC filings and technical accounting issues. Amounts include $70,032 and $69,000 related to the review of acquisitions by the Company in 2013 and 2012, respectively. Additionally, 2012 includes $6,000 related to the review of an SEC comment letter to the Company. It is the policy of the Audit Committee to pre-approve all services provided by its independent registered public accountants. In addition, the Audit Committee has granted the Chairman of the Audit Committee the power to pre-approve any services that the Committee, as a whole, could approve. None of the fees were approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to the de minimis exception of Reg S-X T Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C). ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The entire cost of soliciting proxies will be borne by the Company. In addition to solicitation of proxies by mail, proxies may be solicited by the Company’s directors, officers, and other employees by personal interview, telephone, and telegram. The persons making such solicitations will receive no additional compensation for such services. The Company also requests that brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees, and fiduciaries forward solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of the shares of Common Stock held of record by such persons and will pay such brokers and other fiduciaries all of their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection therewith. As of the date of this Proxy Material, the Board does not intend to present, and has not been informed that any other person intends to present, any matter for action at the Annual Meeting other than those specifically referred to herein. If other matters should properly come before the Annual Meeting, it is intended that the holders of the proxies will vote in accordance with their best judgment. OTHER MATTERS Dated: March 24, 2014 The Dixie Group, Inc. Daniel K. Frierson Chairman of the Board 26 (THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK) (THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK) (THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK) The environment encompasses all that is around us. At Dixie Group, we have a global perspective about the environment and our impact upon it. With customers around the world, we are mindful that our actions reflect our commitment as an environmentally sound manufacturer. Improvement in all areas of performance, including reducing the environmental impact of our manufacturing processes, is an inherent part of our corporate strategy. We are committed to providing a safe and healthy environment for our associates and our communities. Dixie is focused on leading industry efforts to integrate sustainability into product creation and manufacturing. We are committed to making our environment thrive through our attention to products, processes and services. Please see the listing inside the 2013 Annual Report front cover for The Dixie Group residential and commercial brands. 2208 South Hamilton Street | Dalton, Georgia 30721-4974 

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above