Dixie Group
Annual Report 2017

Plain-text annual report

2017 Annual Report and Proxy Statement THE DIXIE GROUP 2017 ANNUAL REPORT 01 The Dixie Group is the promi nent provider of high-end carpets, rugs and luxury vinyl flooring to both the resi dential and cor- porate markets. We are known for our focus on sophistication and style, brilliant color, exclusive design and superb quality. Our emphasis on superior product design continues to lead fashion trends and satisfy the dis­ cerning consumer and corporate customer. Fabrica, Masland and Dixie Home encompass the brands of our high end residential offerings. These brands are known for fine quality, and innovative styling that provide beauty and comfort to the home setting. Our commercial offering consists of Masland Contract, Atlas Carpet Mills and Dixie Inter­ national. Our commercial brands service the high­end corporate, hospitality and all areas of the specified commercial markets. We are focused on our primary com­ petencies of distinctive design and excellent quality. Our commit­ ment is to provide a unique line of brands that satisfy the needs of the upper­end of the soft floor covering market. 02 THE DIXIE GROUP 2017 ANNUAL REPORT THE DIXIE GROUP 2017 ANNUAL REPORT Letter to Shareholders 2017 was a year of opportunities in the market­ place and internal change for our company. During this year, we saw both Royalty Carpet Mills and Beaulieu go out of business, creat­ ing opportunities upon which we have been capitalizing. Internally, we concluded that we needed to bring together our two commercial floorcovering businesses under the leader­ ship of David Hobbs. In our operations, we undertook a number of projects to lower cost and are still working to fully benefit from these changes. The labor market has fun damentally changed in the ease in which a company can attract, retain and train our associates. Finally, we have not yet fully benefited from our investments over the last several years. The residential business grew nicely, up over 9%, while the overall market grew modestly in the low single digits. Two factors were signifi­ cant in our growth. Firstly, Royalty Carpet Mills ceased operations in June, thus creating a space in the West Coast market for upper end goods. We took advantage of this oppor­ tunity in multiple ways. We rapidly expanded our offerings on the West Coast and either deepened or established relationships with many retailers and builders in the area. We took over Royalty’s Porterville yarn plant to allow us to quickly service the entire supply chain from the West Coast. We hired many experienced associates from Royalty, both in sales and operations. During 2017, we continued our strategic movement into hard surfaces by launching our Stainmaster PetProtect® luxury vinyl floor­ ing with its “Claw Scratch Shield” coating to the residential market through our Masland and Dixie Home brands. Dixie Home is offering this superior residential product line with a limited lifetime warranty while Masland is offering a commercial grade version of the PetProtect® line featuring one of the heaviest wear layers available in the industry with a lim­ ited lifetime residential warranty and a 12­year limited commercial warranty. With over 1,300 dealers having displays, we have made a solid foundation upon which we can build our luxury vinyl flooring business. We are now launching a new luxury engineered wood line under our Fabrica brand. This line of superior engineered wood flooring and wall treatments is designed to fulfill the needs of discriminating designers and consumers. We will roll out this line of prod­ ucts regionally first and then nationally later. We have been disappointed with our results in the commercial market. Our sales for the year have been flat while the commercial soft floorcovering market, we believe, declined in the low single digits. However, operationally we have struggled to meet our financial expec­ tations. Therefore, we decided to merge the management of our two commercial busi­ nesses, Masland Contract and Atlas Carpet Mills, under one common operational struc­ ture. Similar to what we did in 2009 with our residential business, we will maintain the power of dedicated sales forces for each brand but share back office functions and support staff. This transition, which will result in our saving over $3 million in 2018, is in place and we are gaining synergies in our operations and sales support functions. We are excited about the lineup of new products we are introducing that leverages the design expertise of both commercial brands to give us many new and exciting broadloom and modular carpet tile products. Further, we are 03 continuing the expansion of our Calibrè and Quiet Down lines of luxury vinyl flooring prod­ ucts through our Masland Contract brand. This past year has seen steady growth in this hard surface category as we penetrated this market since we launched Calibrè in late 2016. Financially, the sales volume improvements we saw in 2017 relative to 2016 were largely offset by compressed margins as we dealt with rising costs in raw materials, associate and other operating costs. We did improve our operational performance over 2016 but not to our level of expectations. Therefore, 2018 will be a year focused on refining the operational changes we made in 2017 to fully realize those planned operational savings. We have dedicated our south Alabama facilities over the last several years to becoming fully integrated yarn, tufting and finishing opera­ tions for make to order broadloom and modu­ lar carpet tile products. With this focus, we expanded our yarn processing capabilities in our Atmore operation to include additional yarn processing and heat setting capabilities with variable package size capabilities to sup­ port our make to order model. This project is physically complete but we are still in process of achieving all of the operational efficiencies before we are satisfied. Likewise, we have added an EVA pre­coat line to allow us to expand our range of modular carpet tile prod­ ucts as well as lower our cost for this import­ ant product category. We successfully started up the line this past fall and now are finalizing the operational parameters to have it operating at full efficiency early in 2018. A third major initiative has been the consolidation of all of our north Georgia dye operations into our Colormaster facility. We have completed the physical changes but are still working through operational issues related to staffing and training. Across all of our operations, we have seen more difficulty in hiring and retaining associates. A major focus of 2018 will be a more intense emphasis on training and associate communications to be able to better attract and retain talent to a manufacturing work environment. To support our efforts to complete all of the initiatives of the last year, we have limited our capital expenditures in 2018 to a maintenance level of spending. Similarly, we have set up teams to address specific areas of opportunity in operations and planning to increase our asset utilization while maintaining higher levels of service. We want to thank Paul Comiskey, upon his retirement, for his leadership and vision for our residential business. Paul successfully took our three businesses and brought them together under one organizational structure over the last 11 years while doubling our market share and starting us down the path of mov­ ing from a soft surface company to a residential flooring provider. Likewise, we want to thank John Murrey, a faithful member of our board since 1997, for his many years of service to Dixie. John provided Dixie with wise judge­ ment and advice, first as our general counsel and later as a board member. We will miss him with his retirement from the board this year. We want to thank all of our associates for all of the hard work they have been through this past year, and we appreciate their efforts to move us forward to sustained profitability. We appreciate both our investors and our board of directors for their valued input. We are committed to supplying fine floorcovering products to our customers that meet the style, design and quality standards they have come to expect from us and would like to thank them for their continued support this past year. Sincerely DANIEL K. FRIERSON Chairman and Chief Executive Officer March 23, 2018 “ We are committed to supplying fine floor- covering products to our customers that meet the style, design and quality standards they have come to expect from us and would like to thank them for their continued support this past year.” 04 THE DIXIE GROUP 2017 ANNUAL REPORT THE DIXIE GROUP 2017 ANNUAL REPORT 05 Fabrica, Masland and Dixie Home encompass the brands of our high-end residen- tial offerings. These brands are known for fine quality and innovative styling that provide beauty and comfort to the home setting. Through an exceptional line of brands, our upper-end residential products are marketed to domestic and international customers in residential markets. While we continue to lead with carpet as our primary offering, we have entered into the Luxury Vinyl Flooring segment this year with our Masland and Dixie Home brands. Our STAINMASTER™ PetProtect™ Luxury Vinyl Flooring offerings perfectly complement the already diverse range of residential flooring options with a range of high­end designs, constructions and price points, allowing us to immediately compete in the fastest growing residential flooring segment. FABRICA fulfills the promise of our corporate mission of “Quality without Compromise.” Fabrica manufactures carpets and rugs for the most demanding segments of the high­end style residential market. Our distinctive broadloom carpet, custom area rugs and hand­tufted rugs have earned Fabrica an international reputation for exquisite style and exceptional performance. Fabrica is entering the engineered hardwood market in 2018 as we continue to expand our offering to the discerning customer. MASL AND C ARPETS AND RUGS was founded in Pennsylvania in 1866 by Charles Henry Masland when he and his brother James opened a dye house in Germantown, Pennsylvania. Today, Masland continues to boast of its heritage as the leading flooring manufacturer in the United States. The tradition of manufacturing quality products has been practiced for over 150 years and continues to be practiced today. DIXIE HOME was founded in early 2003 on the premise that fashion and design do not have to be limited to the high end of the market. Since that time, Dixie Home has experienced rapid growth and enthusiastic market acceptance for their stylish, tufted broadloom carpet and luxury vinyl floor­ ing offerings that fall within more moderately priced segments of the high­style residential market. 06 THE DIXIE GROUP 2017 ANNUAL REPORT Dixie has assembled a group of unique commercial brands with one common denominator. Each of our divisions market to brand conscious companies where smart design enhances their image and helps them achieve their goals. The diverse spaces we build products for—hotels, office buildings, restaurants, universities and more—are all design conscious and we style and construct products that will reflect their brand image in the best possible way. MASL AND CONTR AC T draws on over 150 years of expertise in flooring and combines the latest trends in commercial design to bring a performance line of innovative products to the markets we serve. Masland Contract has long been a style leader in broadloom carpet and modular carpet tile and now with the introduction of Luxury Vinyl Flooring and an extensive area rug line to com­ plement hard surface offerings, we are capable of any solution for brand savvy interiors. ATL AS CARPET MILLS is a style leader that has been designing and manufacturing unique broadloom, modular carpet tile and area rugs for commercial environments over the past 40 years. Known for creating award­winning products, the company provides a wide array of exceptional patterns and textures for interior spaces that require superior aesthetics and performance. In addition to the diverse running line collection, Atlas also offers extensive custom design capabilities for its customers. The use of Atlas products provides the ability to differentiate an environment from competitors, thereby attracting and maintaining both external and internal customers. DIXIE INTERNATIONAL supplies all of our residential and commercial brands to customers around the world. 08 THE DIXIE GROUP 2017 ANNUAL REPORT THE DIXIE GROUP 2017 ANNUAL REPORT The Dixie Group continues to strive towards the creation of a healthier planet for the current population, as well as future generations. The Dixie Group is committed to embracing new technologies for more efficient ways to manufacture our products, conserving our natural resources, and creating less waste. We understand that everything we do has an impact on our planet, and we are committed to leaving the smallest possible footprint impacting our environment. At The Dixie Group, we have a global perspective about the environment and our impact upon it. People Communities Planet The Dixie Group also believes in working smarter to create all of our products, and eliminating wasteful production methods. Our factories have been recy- cling scrap metal, fiber waste, cardboard, and plas- tic sheeting for years. We are proud to say that our Fabrica division won the WRAP Award from the California Integrated Waste Management Board for being recognized as one of the local businesses which had implemented outstand- ing waste reduction efforts. Consumption of water, elec- tricity and natural gas used in the dyeing and finishing processes has been signifi- cantly reduced. In the last four years in Masland Contract carpet production, we have reduced electricity by 29%, natural gas by 85%, and water—an astounding 97% reduction. In our Atmore and Saraland production facilities, 100% of energy consumption is offset 1:1 by renewable energy credits. This is where the amount of energy consumed is matched by energy generated by a clean power facility and added back to the national electric grid. When building product port- folios, The Dixie Group places high priority on mate- rials selected for recycled content. In our Atmore and Saraland facilities in 2017, we diverted a total of 4,184,280 pounds of waste from the landfill. We have also initiated programs within our tufting facilities to rewind and recy- cle short ends of yarn into other production runs, pre- venting waste which would otherwise end up outside the recycle chain for reprocess- ing into other products, such as carpet padding, automo- bile parts, and roof shingles. When possible, each of the companies within The Dixie Group attempts to house their inventory within one localized facility, in order to eliminate transportation costs of moving supplies from one facility to another. 1 0 - K R E P O R T UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 30, 2017 OR For the transition period from _________ to ________. Commission File Number 0-2585 The Dixie Group, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation of organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) Tennessee 62-0183370 475 Reed Road, Dalton, GA 30720 (706) 876-5800 (Address of principal executive offices and zip code) (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Class Common Stock, $3.00 par value Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Title of class None Name of each exchange on which registered NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulations S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes No Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of the Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of "large accelerated filer", "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer Accelerated filer Non-accelerated filer Smaller reporting company Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes No The aggregate market value of the Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on June 30, 2017 (the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed fiscal second quarter) was $49,362,361. The aggregate market value was computed by reference to the closing price of the Common Stock on such date. In making this calculation, the registrant has assumed, without admitting for any purpose, that all executive officers, directors, and holders of more than 10% of a class of outstanding Common Stock, and no other persons, are affiliates. No market exists for the shares of Class B Common Stock, which is neither registered under Section 12 of the Act nor subject to Section 15(d) of the Act. Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of Common Stock as of the latest practicable date. Class Common Stock, $3.00 Par Value Class B Common Stock, $3.00 Par Value Class C Common Stock, $3.00 Par Value Outstanding as of February 23, 2018 15,279,812 shares 861,499 shares 0 shares Specified portions of the following document are incorporated by reference: Proxy Statement of the registrant for annual meeting of shareholders to be held May 2, 2018 (Part III). DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE 1 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. Index to Annual Report on Form 10-K for Year Ended December 30, 2017 PART I Page Item 1. Business Item 1A. Risk Factors Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments Item 2. Item 3. Item 4. Properties Legal Proceedings Mine Safety Disclosures Executive Officers of the Registrant PART II Item 5. Item 6. Item 7. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Selected Financial Data Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Item 8. Item 9. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure Item 9A. Controls and Procedures Item 9B. Other Information Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance Item 11. Executive Compensation PART III Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules PART IV Item 16. Form 10-K Summary Signatures CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Consolidated Balance Sheets - December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 Consolidated Statements of Operations - Years ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016, and December 26, 2015 Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) - Years ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016, and December 26, 2015 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Years ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016, and December 26, 2015 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity - December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016, and December 26, 2015 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Exhibit Index 2 4 7 10 10 10 11 12 13 16 17 26 26 26 26 26 27 27 27 27 27 28 28 29 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 67 FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION This Report contains statements that may be considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such statements include the use of terms or phrases such as "expects," "estimates," "projects," "believes," "anticipates," "intends," and similar terms and phrases. Such forward-looking statements relate to, among other matters, our future financial performance, business prospects, growth strategies or liquidity. The following important factors may affect our future results and could cause those results to differ materially from our historical results; these factors include, in addition to those "Risk Factors" detailed in Item 1A of this report, and described elsewhere in this document, the cost and availability of capital, raw material and transportation costs related to petroleum price levels, the cost and availability of energy supplies, the loss of a significant customer or group of customers, ability to attract, develop and retain qualified personnel, materially adverse changes in economic conditions generally in carpet, rug and floorcovering markets we serve and other risks detailed from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 3 Item 1. BUSINESS General PART I. Our business consists principally of marketing, manufacturing and selling floorcovering products to high-end residential and commercial customers through our various sales forces and brands. We focus exclusively on the upper-end of the floorcovering market where we believe we have strong brands and competitive advantages with our style and design capabilities and customer relationships. Our Fabrica, Masland, and Dixie Home brands have a significant presence in the high-end residential floorcovering markets. Our Atlas Carpet Mills and Masland Contract brands participate in the upper-end specified commercial marketplace. Dixie International sells all of our brands outside of the North American market. Our business is primarily concentrated in areas of the soft floorcovering markets which include broadloom carpet, carpet tiles and rugs. However, over the past few years, there has been a significant shift in the flooring marketplace as hard surface products have grown at a rate much faster than soft surface products. We have responded to this accelerated shift to hard surface flooring by launching several initiatives in both our residential and commercial brands. Our commercial brands offer luxury vinyl flooring (“LVF”) products under the Calibré brand in the commercial markets. Our residential brands, Dixie Home and Masland Residential, offer Stainmaster® PetProtect™ luxury vinyl flooring. Beginning in 2018, our residential brand, Fabrica, will offer a high-end engineered wood line. We have one reportable segment, Floorcovering which is comprised of two operating segments, Residential and Commercial. We have aggregated the two operating segments into one reporting segment because they have similar economic characteristics, and the operating segments are similar in all of the following areas: (a) the nature of the products and services; (b) the nature of the production processes; (c) the type or class of customer for their products and services; (d) the methods used to distribute their products or provide their services; and (e) the nature of the regulatory environment. Our Brands Our brands are well known, highly regarded and complementary; by being differentiated, we offer meaningful alternatives to the discriminating customer. Fabrica markets and manufactures luxurious residential carpet and custom rugs, at selling prices that we believe are approximately five times the average for the residential soft floorcovering industry. Its primary customers are interior decorators and designers, selected retailers and furniture stores, luxury home builders and manufacturers of luxury motor coaches and yachts. Fabrica is among the leading premium brands in the domestic marketplace and is known for styling innovation and unique colors and patterns. Fabrica consists of extremely high quality carpets and area rugs in both nylon and wool, with a wide variety of patterns and textures. Fabrica is viewed by the trade as the premier quality brand for very high-end carpet and enjoys an established reputation as a styling trendsetter and a market leader in providing both custom and designer products to the very high-end residential sector. Masland Residential, founded in 1866, markets and manufactures design-driven specialty carpets and rugs for the high-end residential marketplace. In addition, it offers luxury vinyl flooring products to the marketplace it serves. Its residential and commercial broadloom carpet products are marketed at selling prices that we believe are over three times the average for the residential soft floorcovering industry. Its products are marketed through the interior design community, as well as to consumers through specialty floorcovering retailers. Masland Residential has strong brand recognition within the upper-end residential market. Masland Residential competes through innovative styling, color, product design, quality and service. Dixie Home provides stylishly designed, differentiated products that offer affordable fashion to residential consumers. Dixie Home markets an array of residential tufted broadloom and rugs to selected retailers and home centers under the Dixie Home and private label brands. In addition, it offers luxury vinyl flooring products to the marketplace it serves. Its objective is to make the Dixie Home brand the choice for styling, service and quality in the more moderately priced sector of the high-end residential market. Its products are marketed at selling prices which we believe average two times the soft floorcovering industry's average selling price. Atlas Carpet Mills is our premium commercial brand. Atlas has long been known for superior style and design. Atlas’ focus is the specified design community including architects and designers who serve the upper-end commercial marketplace. The Atlas brand has unique styling, as evident in both its broadloom and modular carpet tile product offerings. Atlas’ high quality offerings are manufactured utilizing just in time manufacturing techniques in our California operations. Masland Contract markets and manufactures broadloom and modular carpet tile for the specified commercial marketplace. In addition, Masland Contract offers luxury vinyl flooring to the commercial marketplace. Its commercial products are marketed to the architectural and specified design community and directly to commercial end users, as well as to consumers through specialty floorcovering retailers. Masland Contract also sells to the hospitality market with both custom designed and running line products. Utilizing computerized yarn placement technology, as well as offerings utilizing our state of the art Infinity tufting technology, this brand provides excellent service and design flexibility to the hospitality market serving upper-end hotels, conference centers and 4 senior living markets. Its broadloom and rug product offerings are designed for the interior designer in the upper-end of the hospitality market who appreciates sophisticated texture, color and patterns with excellent service. Masland Contract has strong brand recognition within the upper-end contract market, and competes through innovative styling, color, patterns, quality and service. Industry We are a flooring manufacturer in an industry composed of a wide variety of companies from small privately held firms to large multinationals. In 2016, the most recent information available, the U.S. floorcovering industry reported $24.5 billion in sales, up approximately 4.4% over 2015's sales of $23.4 billion. In 2016, the primary categories of flooring in the U.S., based on sales, were carpet and rug (47%), wood (15%), resilient (includes vinyl and luxury vinyl flooring) and rubber (15%), ceramic tile (13%), stone (6%) and laminate (4%). In 2016, the primary categories of flooring in the U.S., based on square feet, were carpet and rug (53%), resilient (includes vinyl and luxury vinyl flooring) and rubber (19%), ceramic tile (14%), wood (8%), laminate (5%) and stone (1%). Each of these categories is influenced by the residential construction, commercial construction, and residential remodeling markets. These markets are influenced by many factors including consumer confidence, spending for durable goods, turnover in housing and the overall strength of the economy. The carpet and rug category has two primary markets, residential and commercial, with the residential market making up the largest portion of the industry's sales. A substantial portion of industry shipments is made in response to replacement demand. Residential products consist of broadloom carpets and rugs in a broad range of styles, colors and textures. Commercial products consist primarily of broadloom carpet and modular carpet tile for a variety of institutional applications such as office buildings, restaurant chains, schools and other commercial establishments. The carpet industry also manufactures carpet for the automotive, recreational vehicle, small boat and other industries. The Carpet and Rug Institute (the "CRI") is the national trade association representing carpet and rug manufacturers. Information compiled by the CRI suggests that the domestic carpet and rug industry is comprised of fewer than 100 manufacturers, with a significant majority of the industry's production concentrated in a limited number of manufacturers focused on the lower end of the price curve. We believe that this industry focus provides us with opportunities to capitalize on our competitive strengths in selected markets where innovative styling, design, product differentiation, focused service and limited distribution add value. Competition The floorcovering industry is highly competitive. We compete with other carpet and rug manufacturers and other types of floorcoverings. In addition, the industry provides multiple floorcovering surfaces such as luxury vinyl tile and wood. Though soft floorcovering is still the dominant floorcovering surface, it has gradually lost market share to hard floorcovering surfaces over the last 25 years. We believe our products are among the leaders in styling and design in the high-end residential and high-end commercial carpet markets. However, a number of manufacturers produce competitive products and some of these manufacturers have greater financial resources than we do. We believe the principal competitive factors in our primary floorcovering markets are styling, color, product design, quality and service. In the high-end residential and commercial markets, we compete with various other floorcovering suppliers. Nevertheless, we believe we have competitive advantages in several areas. We have an attractive portfolio of brands that we believe are well known, highly regarded by customers and complementary; by being differentiated, we offer meaningful alternatives to the discriminating customer. We believe our investment in new yarns, such as Stainmaster's® LiveWell™ and PetProtect™, and innovative tufting and dyeing technologies, strengthens our ability to offer product differentiation to our customers. In addition, we have established longstanding relationships with key suppliers, such as the providers of Stainmaster® for which we utilize both branded yarns and luxury vinyl flooring, and significant customers in most of our markets. Finally, our reputation for innovative design excellence and our experienced management team enhance our competitive position. See "Risk Factors" in Item 1A of this report. Backlog Sales order backlog is not material to understanding our business, due to relatively short lead times for order fulfillment in the markets for the vast majority of our products. Trademarks Our floorcovering businesses own a variety of trademarks under which our products are marketed. Among such trademarks, the names "Fabrica", "Masland", "Dixie Home", “Atlas Carpet Mills”, “Masland Contract” and "Masland Hospitality" are of greatest importance to our business. We believe that we have taken adequate steps to protect our interest in all significant trademarks. 5 Customer and Product Concentration As a percentage of our net sales, one customer, Lowe's, a mass merchant, accounted for approximately 14% in 2017, 10% in 2016, and 9% in 2015 and as a percentage of our customer's trade accounts receivable, accounted for approximately 31% in 2017 and 28% in 2016. No other customer was more than 10 percent of our sales during the periods presented. During 2017, sales to our top ten customers accounted for 18% percent of our sales and our top 20 customers accounted for 21% percent of our sales. We do not make a material amount of sales in foreign countries. We do not have any single class of products that accounts for more than 10 percent of our sales. However, sales of our floorcovering products may be classified by significant end-user markets into which we sell, and such information for the past three years is summarized as follows: Residential floorcovering products Commercial floorcovering products Seasonality 2017 68% 32% 2016 66% 34% 2015 64% 36% Our sales historically have normally reached their lowest level in the first quarter (approximately 23% of our annual sales), with the remaining sales being distributed relatively equally among the second, third and fourth quarters. Working capital requirements have normally reached their highest levels in the third and fourth quarters of the year. Environmental Our operations are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the generation, storage, handling, emission, transportation and discharge of materials into the environment. The costs of complying with environmental protection laws and regulations have not had a material adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations in the past. See "Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this report. Raw Materials Our primary raw material is bulk continuous filament for yarn. Nylon is the primary yarn we utilize and, to a lesser extent, wool and polyester yarn is used. Additionally, we utilize polypropylene carpet backing, latex, dyes and chemicals, and man-made topical applications in the construction of our products. Our synthetic yarns are purchased primarily from domestic fiber suppliers and wool is purchased from a number of international sources. Our other raw materials are purchased primarily from domestic suppliers, although the majority of our luxury vinyl tile is sourced outside the United States. Where possible, we pass raw material price increases through to our customers; however, there can be no assurance that price increases can be passed through to customers and that increases in raw material prices will not have an adverse effect on our profitability. See "Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this report. We purchase a significant portion of our primary raw material (nylon yarn) from one supplier. We believe there are other sources of nylon yarn; however, an unanticipated termination or interruption of our supply arrangements could adversely affect our supplies of raw materials and could have a material effect on our operations. See "Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this report. Utilities We use electricity as our principal energy source, with oil or natural gas used in some facilities for dyeing and finishing operations as well as heating. We have not experienced any material problem in obtaining adequate supplies of electricity, natural gas or oil. Energy shortages of extended duration could have an adverse effect on our operations, and price volatility could negatively impact future earnings. See "Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this report. Working Capital We are required to maintain significant levels of inventory in order to provide the enhanced service levels demanded by the nature of our business and our customers, and to ensure timely delivery of our products. Consistent and dependable sources of liquidity are required to maintain such inventory levels. Failure to maintain appropriate levels of inventory could materially adversely affect our relationships with our customers and adversely affect our business. See "Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this report. Employment Level At December 30, 2017, we employed 1,930 associates in our operations. 6 Available Information Our internet address is www.thedixiegroup.com. We make the following reports filed by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission available, free of charge, on our website under the heading "Investor Relations": 1. annual reports on Form 10-K; 2. quarterly reports on Form 10-Q; 3. current reports on Form 8-K; and 4. amendments to the foregoing reports. The contents of our website are not a part of this report. Item 1A. RISK FACTORS In addition to the other information provided in this Report, the following risk factors should be considered when evaluating the results of our operations, future prospects and an investment in shares of our Common Stock. Any of these factors could cause our actual financial results to differ materially from our historical results, and could give rise to events that might have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The floorcovering industry is sensitive to changes in general economic conditions and a decline in residential or commercial construction activity or corporate remodeling and refurbishment could have a material adverse effect on our business. The floorcovering industry, in which we participate, is highly dependent on general economic conditions, such as consumer confidence and income, corporate and government spending, interest rate levels, availability of credit and demand for housing. We derive a majority of our sales from the replacement segment of the market. Therefore, economic changes that result in a significant or prolonged decline in spending for remodeling and replacement activities could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. The floorcovering industry is highly dependent on construction activity, including new construction, which is cyclical in nature. The U.S. and global economies, along with the residential and commercial markets in such economies, can negatively impact the floorcovering industry and our business. Although the impact of a decline in new construction activity is typically accompanied by an increase in remodeling and replacement activity, these activities typically lag during a cyclical downturn. Although the difficult economic conditions have improved since the last cyclical downturn in 2008, there may be additional downturns that could cause the industry to deteriorate in the foreseeable future. A significant or prolonged decline in residential or commercial construction activity could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. We have significant levels of sales in certain channels of distribution and reduction in sales through these channels could adversely affect our business. A significant amount of our sales are generated through certain retail and mass merchant channels of distribution. A significant reduction of sales through such channels could adversely affect our business. We have significant levels of indebtedness that could result in negative consequences to us. We have a significant amount of indebtedness relative to our equity. Insufficient cash flow, profitability or the value of our assets securing our loans could materially adversely affect our ability to generate sufficient funds to satisfy the terms of our senior loan agreements and other debt obligations. Additionally, the inability to access debt or equity markets at competitive rates in sufficient amounts to satisfy our obligations could adversely impact our business. Uncertainty in the credit market or downturns in the economy and our business could affect our overall availability and cost of credit. Uncertainty in the credit markets could affect the availability and cost of credit. Despite recent improvement in overall economic conditions, market conditions could impact our ability to obtain financing in the future, including any financing necessary to refinance existing indebtedness. The cost and terms of such financing is uncertain. Continued operating losses could affect our ability to continue to access the credit markets under our current terms and conditions. These and other economic factors could have a material adverse effect on demand for our products and on our financial condition and operating results. We face intense competition in our industry, which could decrease demand for our products and could have a material adverse effect on our profitability. The floorcovering industry is highly competitive. We face competition from a number of domestic manufacturers and independent distributors of floorcovering products and, in certain product areas, foreign manufacturers. Significant consolidation within the floorcovering industry has caused a number of our existing and potential competitors to grow significantly larger and have greater 7 access to resources and capital than we do. Maintaining our competitive position may require us to make substantial additional investments in our product development efforts, manufacturing facilities, distribution network and sales and marketing activities. These additional investments may be limited by our access to capital, as well as restrictions set forth in our credit facilities. Competitive pressures and the accelerated growth of hard surface alternatives, have resulted in decreased demand for our soft floorcovering products and in the loss of market share to hard surface products. As a result, competition from providers of other soft surfaces has intensified and may result in decreased demand for our products. In addition, we face, and will continue to face, competitive pressures on our sales price and cost of our products. As a result of any of these factors, there could be a material adverse effect on our sales and profitability. If we are unable to anticipate consumer preferences and successfully develop and introduce new, innovative and updated products, we may not be able to maintain or increase our net revenues and profitability. Our success depends on our ability to identify and originate product trends as well as to anticipate and react to changing consumer demands in a timely manner. All of our products are subject to changing consumer preferences that cannot be predicted with certainty. In addition, long lead times for certain of our products may make it hard for us to quickly respond to changes in consumer demands. Our new products may not receive consumer acceptance as consumer preferences could shift rapidly to different types of flooring products or away from these types of products altogether, and our future success depends in part on our ability to anticipate and respond to these changes. Failure to anticipate and respond in a timely manner to changing consumer preferences could lead to, among other things, lower sales and excess inventory levels, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition. Raw material prices may vary and the inability to either offset or pass on such cost increases or avoid passing on decreases larger than the cost decrease to our customers could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. We require substantial amounts of raw materials to produce our products, including nylon and polyester yarn, as well as wool yarns, synthetic backing, latex, and dyes. Substantially all of the raw materials we require are purchased from outside sources. The prices of raw materials and fuel-related costs vary significantly with market conditions. The fact that we source a significant amount of raw materials means that several months of raw materials and work in process are moving through our supply chain at any point in time. We are sourcing the majority of our new luxury vinyl flooring and wood product lines from overseas. We are not able to predict whether commodity costs will significantly increase or decrease in the future. If commodity costs increase in the future and we are not able to reduce or eliminate the effect of the cost increases by reducing production costs or implementing price increases, our profit margins could decrease. If commodity costs decline, we may experience pressures from customers to reduce our selling prices. The timing of any price reductions and decreases in commodity costs may not align. As a result, our margins could be affected. Unanticipated termination or interruption of our arrangements with third-party suppliers of nylon yarn could have a material adverse effect on us. Nylon yarn is the principal raw material used in our floorcovering products. A significant portion of such yarn is purchased from one supplier. Our yarn supplier is one of the leading fiber suppliers within the industry and is the exclusive supplier of certain innovative branded fiber technology upon which we rely. We believe our offerings of this innovative fiber technology contribute materially to the competitiveness of our products. While we believe there are other sources of nylon yarns, an unanticipated termination or interruption of our current supply of branded nylon yarn could have a material adverse effect on our ability to supply our product to our customers and have a material adverse impact on our competitiveness if we are unable to replace our nylon supplier with another supplier that can offer similar innovative and branded fiber products. An interruption in the supply of these or other raw materials or sourced products used in our business or in the supply of suitable substitute materials or products would disrupt our operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. We rely on information systems in managing our operations and any system failure or deficiencies of such systems may have an adverse effect on our business. Our businesses rely on sophisticated systems to obtain, rapidly process, analyze and manage data. We rely on these systems to, among other things facilitate the purchase, manufacture and distribution of our products; receive, process and ship orders on a timely basis; and to maintain accurate and up-to-date operating and financial data for the compilation of management information. We rely on our computer hardware, software and network for the storage, delivery and transmission of data to our sales and distribution systems, and certain of our production processes are managed and conducted by computer. Any damage by unforeseen events or system failure which causes interruptions to the input, retrieval and transmission of data or increase in the service time, whether caused by human error, natural disasters, power loss, computer viruses, intentional acts of vandalism, various forms of cybercrimes including and not limited to hacking, intrusions and malware or otherwise, could disrupt our normal operations. There can be no assurance that we can effectively carry out our disaster recovery plan to handle the failure of our information systems, or that we will be able to restore our operational capacity within sufficient time to avoid material disruption to our business. The occurrence of any of these events could cause unanticipated disruptions in service, decreased customer service and customer satisfaction and harm to our reputation, which could result in loss of customers, increased operating expenses and financial losses. Any such events could in turn have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects. 8 The long-term performance of our business relies on our ability to attract, develop and retain qualified personnel. To be successful, we must attract, develop and retain qualified and talented personnel in management, sales, marketing, product design and operations. We compete with other floorcovering companies for these employees and invest resources in recruiting, developing, motivating and retaining them. The failure to attract, develop, motivate and retain key employees could negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. We may experience certain risks associated with internal expansion, acquisitions, joint ventures and strategic investments. We have recently embarked on several strategic and tactical initiatives, including aggressive internal expansion, acquisitions and investment in new products, to strengthen our future and to enable us to return to sustained growth and profitability. Growth through expansion and acquisition involves risks, many of which may continue to affect us after the acquisition or expansion. An acquired company, operation or internal expansion may not achieve the levels of revenue, profitability and production that we expect. The combination of an acquired company’s business with ours involves risks. Further, internally generated growth that involves expansion involves risks as well. Such risks include the integration of computer systems, alignment of human resource policies and the retention of valued talent. Reported earnings may not meet expectations because of goodwill and intangible asset impairment, other asset impairments, increased interest costs and issuance of additional securities or debt as a result of these acquisitions. We may also face challenges in consolidating functions and integrating our organizations, procedures, operations and product lines in a timely and efficient manner. The diversion of management attention and any difficulties encountered in the transition and integration process could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, level of expenses and operating results. Failure to successfully manage and integrate an acquisition with our existing operations or expansion of our existing operations could lead to the potential loss of customers of the acquired or existing business, the potential loss of employees who may be vital to the new or existing operations, the potential loss of business opportunities or other adverse consequences that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Even if integration occurs successfully, failure of the expansion or acquisition to achieve levels of anticipated sales growth, profitability or productivity, or otherwise perform as expected, may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We are subject to various environmental, safety and health regulations that may subject us to costs, liabilities and other obligations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. We are subject to various environmental, safety and health and other regulations that may subject us to costs, liabilities and other obligations which could have a material adverse effect on our business. The applicable requirements under these laws are subject to amendment, to the imposition of new or additional requirements and to changing interpretations of agencies or courts. We could incur material expenditures to comply with new or existing regulations, including fines and penalties and increased costs of our operations. Additionally, future laws, ordinances, regulations or regulatory guidelines could give rise to additional compliance or remediation costs that could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. For example, producer responsibility regulations regarding end-of-life disposal could impose additional cost and complexity to our business. Various federal, state and local environmental laws govern the use of our current and former facilities. These laws govern such matters as: • Discharge to air and water; • Handling and disposal of solid and hazardous substances and waste, and • Remediation of contamination from releases of hazardous substances in our facilities and off-site disposal locations. Our operations also are governed by laws relating to workplace safety and worker health, which, among other things, establish noise standards and regulate the use of hazardous materials and chemicals in the workplace. We have taken, and will continue to take, steps to comply with these laws. If we fail to comply with present or future environmental or safety regulations, we could be subject to future liabilities. However, we cannot ensure that complying with these environmental or health and safety laws and requirements will not adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. We may be exposed to litigation, claims and other legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business relating to our products or business, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In the ordinary course of business, we are subject to a variety of work-related and product-related claims, lawsuits and legal proceedings, including those relating to product liability, product warranty, product recall, personal injury, and other matters that are inherently subject to many uncertainties regarding the possibility of a loss to our business. Such matters could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition if we are unable to successfully defend against or resolve these matters or if our insurance coverage is insufficient to satisfy any judgments against us or settlements relating to these matters. Although we have product liability insurance, the policies may not provide coverage for certain claims against us or may 9 not be sufficient to cover all possible liabilities. Further, we may not be able to maintain insurance at commercially acceptable premium levels. Additionally, adverse publicity arising from claims made against us, even if the claims are not successful, could adversely affect our reputation or the reputation and sales of our products. Our business operations could suffer significant losses from natural disasters, catastrophes, fire or other unexpected events. Many of our business activities involve substantial investments in manufacturing facilities and many products are produced at a limited number of locations. These facilities could be materially damaged by natural disasters, such as floods, tornadoes, hurricanes and earthquakes, or by fire or other unexpected events such as adverse weather conditions or other disruptions to our facilities, supply chain or our customer's facilities. We could incur uninsured losses and liabilities arising from such events, including damage to our reputation, and/or suffer material losses in operational capacity, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Item 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS None. Item 2. PROPERTIES The following table lists our facilities according to location, type of operation and approximate total floor space as of February 23, 2018: Location Administrative: Saraland, AL Commerce, CA* Santa Ana, CA Calhoun, GA Dalton, GA* Chattanooga, TN* Type of Operation Administrative Administrative Administrative Administrative Administrative Administrative Total Administrative Manufacturing and Distribution: Atmore, AL Roanoke, AL Saraland, AL Commerce, CA* Porterville, CA* Santa Ana, CA Adairsville, GA Calhoun, GA * Calhoun, GA Chickamauga, GA* Eton, GA Carpet Manufacturing, Distribution Carpet Yarn Processing Carpet, Rug and Tile Manufacturing, Distribution Carpet Manufacturing, Distribution Carpet Yarn Processing Carpet and Rug Manufacturing, Distribution Samples and Rug Manufacturing, Distribution Distribution Carpet Dyeing & Processing Carpet Manufacturing Carpet Manufacturing, Distribution Total Manufacturing and Distribution * Leased properties TOTAL Approximate Square Feet 29,000 21,800 4,000 10,600 47,900 3,500 116,800 610,000 204,000 384,000 232,800 249,000 200,000 292,000 99,000 193,300 107,000 408,000 2,979,100 3,095,900 In addition to the facilities listed above, we lease a small amount of office space in various locations. In our opinion, our manufacturing facilities are well maintained and our machinery is efficient and competitive. Operations of our facilities generally vary between 120 and 168 hours per week. Substantially all of our owned properties are subject to mortgages, which secure the outstanding borrowings under our senior credit facilities. 10 Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS We have been sued, together with the 3M Company and approximately 30 other carpet manufacturers, by the Gadsden (Alabama) Water Works in the circuit court of Etowah County Alabama [The Water Works and Sewer Board of the City of Gadsden v. 3M Company, et al, civil action No. 31-CV-2016-900676.00] and by the Town of Centre (Alabama) Water Works in the circuit court of Cherokee County Alabama [The Water Works and Sewer Board of the Town of Centre v. 3M Company, et al, civil action No. 13- CV-2017-900049.00]. Both cases seek monetary damages and injunctive relief related to the use of certain chemical compounds in the manufacture and finishing of carpet products “in and around Dalton Georgia.” On motion of the defendants, the cases were removed to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama (Middle Division) Case No. 4:16-CV-01755-SGC and Case No. 4:17-CV-01026-KOB. Subsequently, the Gadsden Water Works filed a motion to have the case remanded back to the state court and such motion has been granted. The lawsuits allege that perflourinated compounds (“PFC”), perflourinated acid (“PFOA”) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (“PFOS”) manufactured by 3M were used in certain finishing and treatment processes by the defendants and, as a consequence of such use, were subsequently either discharged into or leached into the water systems around Dalton, Georgia. The Complaints seeks damages that exceed $10,000, but are otherwise unspecified in amount in addition to injunctive relief and punitive damages. We intend to defend the matters vigorously and are unable to estimate our potential exposure to loss, if any, at this time. We have received a class action complaint filed by Carlos Garcia, a current employee, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated against Fabrica [Carlos Garcia et al. vs. Fabrica International, Inc., et al., in the Superior Court of Orange County, California, Case No. 30-2017-00949461 CU-OE-CXC]. The complaint alleges causes of actions on behalf of classes of Fabrica’s current and former employees during the four-year period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint for failure to pay proper overtime wages, failure to compensate for all meal periods and rest periods, failure to pay all proper overtime and double time, and for the provision and maintaining of inaccurate wage statements. Finally, the complaint asserts a cause of action for unfair competition by means of the above actions and seeks restitution of monies supposedly unlawfully withheld and demands attorneys’ fees and costs. We have denied liability, are defending the matters vigorously and are unable to estimate our potential exposure to loss, if any, at this time. We are one of multiple parties to three current lawsuits filed in Madison County Illinois, styled Brenda Bridgeman, Individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of Robert Bridgeman, Deceased, vs. American Honda Motor Co., Inc., f/k/a Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., et al No. 15-L-374, styled Charles Anderson, Pltf., vs. 3M Company, et al, No. 17-L-525 and styled Danny Atkins and Pamela Atkins, Pltfs., vs. Aurora Pump Company, et al. No. 18-L-2. All three lawsuits entail a claim for damages to be determined in excess of $50,000 filed on behalf of either a former employee or the estate of an individual which alleges that the deceased contracted mesothelioma as a result of exposure to asbestos while employed by us. Discovery in each matter is ongoing, and a tentative trial date has been set for one of the cases. We have denied liability, are defending the matters vigorously and are unable to estimate our potential exposure to loss, if any, at this time. In August of 2017, the lawsuit styled Sandra D. Watts, Individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of Dianne Averett, Deceased vs. 4520 Corp., Inc. f/k/a Benjamin F. Shaw Company, et al No. 12-L-2032 was placed in the category of "special closed with settlements and bankruptcy claims pending" to all remaining defendants. Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES Not applicable 11 Pursuant to instruction G of Form 10-K the following is included as an unnumbered item to PART I. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT The names, ages, positions and offices held by the executive officers of the registrant as of February 23, 2018, are listed below along with their business experience during the past five years. Name, Age and Position Business Experience During Past Five Years Daniel K. Frierson, 76 Chairman of the Board, and Chief Executive Officer, Director Director since 1973, Chairman of the Board since 1987 and Chief Executive Officer since 1980. He is the Chairman of the Company's Executive Committee. He is past Chairman of The Carpet and Rug Institute. He serves as Director of Astec Industries, Inc. headquartered in Chattanooga, Tennessee; and Louisiana-Pacific Corporation headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee. D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr., 50 Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Director Director since 2012 and Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since August 2009. Vice President and President Masland Residential from February 2006 to July 2009. President Masland Residential from December 2005 to January 2006. Executive Vice President and General Manager, Dixie Home, 2003 to 2005. Business Unit Manager, Bretlin, 2002 to 2003. Jon A. Faulkner, 57 Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Thomas M. Nuckols, 50 Vice President and President, Dixie Residential E. David Hobbs, 66 Vice President and President, Dixie Commercial W. Derek Davis, 67 Vice President, Human Resources and Corporate Secretary Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since October 2009. Vice President of Planning and Development from February 2002 to September 2009. Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing for Steward, Inc. from 1997 to 2002. Vice President and President of Dixie Residential since November 2017. Executive Vice President, Dixie Residential from February 2017 to November 2017. Dupont/Invista, from 1989 to 2017, Senior Director of Mill Sales and Product Strategy from 2015 to 2017. Vice President and President of Dixie Commercial since October 2017. President, Masland Contract from September 2016 to October 2017. Executive President of Operations, Masland Contract from 2012 to September 2016. Vice President of Planning, Mohawk Industries from 2010 to 2011, Interface Americas from 1984 to 2010, President, Interface Americas from 2005 to 2009. Vice President of Human Resources since January 1991 and Corporate Secretary since January 2016. Corporate Employee Relations Director, 1988 to 1991. The executive officers of the registrant are generally elected annually by the Board of Directors at its first meeting held after each annual meeting of our shareholders. 12 PART II. Item 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES Our Common Stock trades on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol DXYN. No market exists for our Class B Common Stock. As of February 23, 2018, the total number of holders of our Common Stock was approximately 2,800 including an estimated 2,400 shareholders who hold our Common Stock in nominee names. The total number of holders of our Class B Common Stock was 10. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities None. Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Fiscal Month Ending November 4, 2017 December 2, 2017 December 30, 2017 Three Fiscal Months Ended December 30, 2017 Total Number of Shares Purchased Average Price Paid Per Share — $ — — — $ — — — — Quarterly Financial Data, Dividends and Price Range of Common Stock Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs Maximum Number (or approximate dollar value) of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under Plans or Programs — — — — $ 2,228,266 Following are quarterly financial data, dividends and price range of Common Stock for the four quarterly periods in the years ended December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. Due to rounding, the totals of the quarterly information for each of the years reflected below may not necessarily equal the annual totals. There is a restriction on the payment of dividends under our revolving credit facility. 13 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA, DIVIDENDS AND PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK (unaudited) (dollars in thousands, except per share data) 2017 Net sales Gross profit Operating income (loss) Income (loss) from continuing operations Loss from discontinued operations Net income (loss) Basic earnings (loss) per share: Continuing operations Discontinued operations Net income (loss) Diluted earnings (loss) per share: Continuing operations Discontinued operations Net income (loss) Common Stock Prices: High Low 2016 Net sales Gross profit Operating income (loss) Income (loss) from continuing operations Loss from discontinued operations Income (loss) on disposal of discontinued operations Net income (loss) Basic earnings (loss) per share: Continuing operations Discontinued operations Disposal of discontinued operations Net income (loss) Diluted earnings (loss) per share: Continuing operations Discontinued operations Disposal of discontinued operations Net income (loss) Common Stock Prices: High Low 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH $ 97,541 $ 107,187 $ 102,650 $ 105,084 25,161 28,426 24,857 628 (575) (29) 3,179 1,226 (123) 767 (547) (11) 22,769 (608) (9,427) (69) (604) $ 1,103 $ (558) $ (9,496) (0.04) $ (0.00) (0.04) $ (0.04) $ (0.00) (0.04) $ 0.08 $ (0.03) $ (0.01) (0.00) 0.07 $ (0.03) $ 0.08 $ (0.03) $ (0.01) (0.00) 0.07 $ (0.03) $ (0.60) (0.00) (0.60) (0.60) (0.00) (0.60) $ 3.95 3.35 $ 5.21 3.30 $ 4.75 3.75 4.30 3.40 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH (1) 89,234 $ 105,316 $ 100,297 $ 102,606 19,506 (5,840) (4,757) (10) — 28,242 3,403 1,615 (3) 65 25,831 1,916 573 (39) — 21,846 (2,894) (2,638) (79) (5) (4,767) $ 1,677 $ 534 $ (2,722) (0.30) $ 0.10 $ 0.04 $ (0.00) — (0.30) $ (0.00) 0.00 0.10 (0.00) — $ 0.04 $ (0.30) $ 0.10 $ 0.04 $ (0.00) — (0.30) $ (0.00) 0.00 0.10 $ 5.66 3.25 4.89 3.00 $ $ (0.00) — 0.04 $ $ 5.15 3.15 5.56 3.20 (0.17) (0.01) (0.00) (0.18) (0.17) (0.01) (0.00) (0.18) $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ (1) The fourth quarter of 2016 contains 14 weeks, all other quarters presented in 2017 and 2016 contain 13 weeks. 14 Shareholder Return Performance Presentation We compare our performance to two different industry indices published by Dow Jones, Inc. The first of these is the Dow Jones US Furnishings Index, which is composed of publicly traded companies classified by Dow Jones in the furnishings industry. The second is the Dow Jones US Building Materials & Fixtures Index, which is composed of publicly traded companies classified by Dow Jones in the building materials and fixtures industry. In accordance with SEC rules, set forth below is a line graph comparing the yearly change in the cumulative total shareholder return on our Common Stock against the total return of the Standard & Poor's Small Cap 600 Stock Index, plus both the Dow Jones US Furnishings Index and the Dow Jones US Building Materials & Fixtures Index, in each case for the five year period ended December 31, 2017. The comparison assumes that $100.00 was invested on December 31, 2012, in our Common Stock, the S&P Small Cap 600 Index, and each of the two Peer Groups, and assumes the reinvestment of dividends. The foregoing shareholder performance presentation shall not be deemed "soliciting material" or to be "filed" with the Commission subject to Regulation 14A, or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. 15 Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA The Dixie Group, Inc. Historical Summary (dollars in thousands, except share and per share data) FISCAL YEARS OPERATIONS Net sales Gross profit Operating income (loss) Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes Income tax provision (benefit) Income (loss) from continuing operations Depreciation and amortization Dividends Capital expenditures Assets purchased under capital leases & notes, including deposits utilized and accrued purchases FINANCIAL POSITION Total assets Working capital Long-term debt Stockholders' equity PER SHARE Income (loss) from continuing operations: Basic Diluted Dividends: Common Stock Class B Common Stock Book value GENERAL 2017 (1) 2016 (2) 2015 (3) 2014 (4)(5) 2013 (6) $ 412,462 $ 397,453 $ 422,483 $ 406,588 $ 344,374 101,213 3,965 (1,813) 7,509 (9,322) 12,947 — 12,724 95,425 (3,415) (8,829) (3,622) (5,207) 13,515 — 4,904 859 427 106,230 1,990 (2,992) (714) (2,278) 14,119 — 6,826 5,403 95,497 (5,236) 1,726 1,053 673 12,850 — 9,492 23,333 85,570 8,855 4,979 (577) 5,556 10,230 — 11,438 1,865 $ 282,838 $ 268,987 $ 298,218 $ 290,447 $ 243,557 105,113 123,446 79,263 81,727 98,256 87,122 98,632 115,907 90,804 100,602 117,153 92,977 89,057 100,521 70,771 $ (0.59) $ (0.33) $ (0.15) $ (0.59) (0.33) (0.15) — — 4.91 — — 5.40 — — 5.67 $ 0.03 0.03 — — 5.90 0.42 0.42 — — 5.32 Weighted-average common shares outstanding: Basic Diluted Number of shareholders (7) Number of associates 15,698,915 15,638,112 15,535,980 14,381,601 12,736,835 15,698,915 15,638,112 15,535,980 14,544,073 12,851,917 2,800 1,930 3,000 1,746 3,000 1,822 3,000 1,740 2,350 1,423 (1) Includes expenses of $636, or $404 net of tax, for facility consolidation and severance expenses in 2017. (2) Includes expenses of $1,456, or $859 net of tax, for facility consolidation expenses in 2016. (3) Includes expenses of $2,946, or $1,915 net of tax, for facility consolidation expenses in 2015. (4) Includes the results of operations of Atlas Carpet Mills, Inc. and Burtco Enterprises, Inc. subsequent to their acquisitions on March 19, 2014 and September 22, 2014, respectively. (5) Includes expenses of $5,514, or $3,364 net of tax, for facility consolidation expenses, $1,133, or $691 net of tax, for impairment of assets and income of $11,110, or $6,777 net of tax, for bargain purchases on the acquisitions of Atlas Carpet Mills and Burtco Enterprises. (6) Includes the results of operations of Robertex, Inc subsequent to its acquisition on June 30, 2013. (7) The approximate number of record holders of our Common Stock for 2013 through 2017 includes Management's estimate of shareholders who held our Common Stock in nominee names as follows: 2013 - 1,900 shareholders; 2014 - 2,550 shareholders; 2015 - 2,550 shareholders; 2016 - 2,600 shareholders; 2017 - 2,400 shareholders. 16 Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this report. OVERVIEW Our business consists principally of marketing, manufacturing and selling floorcovering products to high-end residential and commercial customers through our various sales forces and brands. We focus exclusively on the upper-end of the floorcovering market where we believe we have strong brands and competitive advantages with our style and design capabilities and customer relationships. Our Fabrica, Masland, and Dixie Home brands have a significant presence in the high-end residential floorcovering markets. Our Atlas Carpet Mills and Masland Contract brands, participate in the upper-end specified commercial marketplace. Dixie International sells all of our brands outside of the North American market. Our business is primarily concentrated in areas of the soft floorcovering markets which include broadloom carpet, carpet tiles and rugs. However, over the past few years, there has been a significant shift in the flooring marketplace as hard surface products have grown at a rate much faster than soft surface products. We have responded to this accelerated shift to hard surface flooring by launching several initiatives in both our residential and commercial brands. Our commercial brands offer luxury vinyl flooring (“LVF”) products under the Calibré brand in the commercial markets. Our residential brands, Dixie Home and Masland Residential, offer Stainmaster® PetProtect™ luxury vinyl flooring. Beginning in 2018, our residential brand, Fabrica, will offer a high-end engineered wood line. During 2017, our net sales increased 3.8%, or 5.2% on a “net sales as adjusted” for the difference in the number of weeks in the period, compared with 2016. Sales of residential products increased 8.0%, or 9.3% on a “net sales as adjusted” basis, in 2017 versus 2016, while, we estimate, the industry was up in low single digits. We anticipate the residential housing market will have steady but moderate growth over next several years. Commercial product sales decreased 0.8%, or increased 0.9% on a “net sales as adjusted” basis, during 2017, while, we believe, the industry was down in the low single digits. We anticipate the commercial market to have moderate growth for next year. (See Reconciliation of Net Sales to Net Sales as Adjusted below.) In 2017, we had operating income of $4.0 million compared with an operating loss of $3.4 million in 2016. Despite the improved sales volumes in 2017, our gross profit was adversely affected by rising costs in raw materials and increased operating costs. Additionally, we incurred startup costs related to several manufacturing initiatives including (1) adding yarn processing at our Atmore, Alabama facility, (2) installing a pre-coat line for our modular tile products, (3) completing our Colormaster beck dye and skein dye consolidation, and (4) starting up our Porterville yarn operation in California. With the completion of these initiatives, we have in place a foundation that will allow us to operate more efficiently and reduce waste costs. In addition, as set forth below, we incurred expenses related to our Profit Improvement Plan during the year as we consolidated our two commercial brands. During the fourth quarter of 2017, we announced a Profit Improvement Plan to improve profitability through lower cost and streamlined decision making and aligning processes to maximize efficiency. The plan includes consolidating the management of Dixie's two commercial brands, Atlas Carpet Mills and Masland Contract, under one management team, sharing operations in sales, marketing, product development and manufacturing. Specific to this plan includes focusing nearly all commercial solution dyed make-to-order production in our Atmore, Alabama operations where we have developed such make-to-order capabilities over the last 5 years. Further, we are aligning our west coast production facilities, better utilizing our west coast real estate by moving production to our Porterville, California and Atmore, Alabama operations and preparing for more efficient distribution of our west coast products. In addition, we had reductions in related support functions such as accounting and information services. As a result of this plan, we took a charge of approximately $636 thousand in the fourth quarter of 2017. We estimate additional charges of approximately $746 in fiscal 2018. We estimate annualized reductions in cost in excess of $3 million per year once the Plan is fully implemented in 2018. 17 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Fiscal Year Ended December 30, 2017 Compared with Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2016 Fiscal Year Ended (amounts in thousands) December 30, 2017 % of Net Sales December 31, 2016 % of Net Sales Increase (Decrease) % Change $ 412,462 100.0 % $ 397,453 100.0 % $ 15,009 311,249 75.5 % 302,028 76.0 % Net sales Cost of sales Gross profit Selling and administrative expenses Other operating expense, net Facility consolidation and severance expenses, net Operating income (loss) Interest expense Other expense, net Loss before taxes Income tax provision (benefit) Loss from continuing operations Loss from discontinued operations Income on disposal of discontinued operations 101,213 24.5 % 96,171 23.3 % 441 636 3,965 5,739 39 0.1 % 0.2 % 0.9 % 1.4 % — % (1,813) (0.5)% 7,509 (9,322) (233) — 1.8 % (2.3)% (0.1)% — % 95,425 96,983 401 1,456 24.0 % 24.4 % 0.1 % 0.4 % 9,221 5,788 3.8 % 3.1 % 6.1 % (812) (0.8)% 40 10.0 % (820) (56.3)% (3,415) (0.9)% 7,380 (216.1)% 5,392 22 (8,829) (3,622) (5,207) (131) 60 1.4 % — % (2.3)% (0.9)% (1.4)% — % — % 347 17 6.4 % 77.3 % 7,016 (79.5)% 11,131 (307.3)% (4,115) 79.0 % (102) 77.9 % (60) — % Net loss $ (9,555) (2.4)% $ (5,278) (1.4)% $ (4,277) 81.0 % Our fiscal year ended December 30, 2017 had 52 weeks and fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 had 53 weeks. Discussions below related to percentage changes in net sales for the annual periods have been adjusted to reflect the comparable number of weeks and are qualified with the term “net sales as adjusted”. For comparative purposes, we define "net sales as adjusted" as net sales less the last week of sales in a 53 week fiscal year. We believe “net sales as adjusted” will assist our financial statement users in obtaining comparable data between the reporting periods. (See reconciliation of net sales to net sales as adjusted in the table below.) Reconciliation of Net Sales to Net Sales as Adjusted Fiscal Year Ended (amounts in thousands) Net Sales December 30, 2017 Net Sales December 31, 2016 Week 53 Net Sales as Adjusted December 31, 2016 Increase (Decrease) Net Sales as Adjusted % Change Net sales as adjusted $ 412,462 $ 397,453 $ (5,380) $ 392,073 $ 20,389 5.2% Net Sales. Net sales for the year ended December 30, 2017 were $412.5 million compared with $397.5 million in the year-earlier period, an increase of 3.8%, or 5.2% on a “net sales as adjusted” basis, for the year-over-year comparison. Sales for the industry were flat for 2017 compared with the prior year. Our 2017 year-over-year floorcovering sales comparison reflected an increase of 5.0%, or 6.5% on a “net sales as adjusted” basis, in net sales. Sales of residential floorcovering products were up 8.0%, or 9.3% on a “net sales as adjusted” basis, and sales of commercial floorcovering products decreased 0.8%, or increased 0.9% on a “net sales as adjusted” basis. The increase in net sales was due to strong demand for our residential products through our mass merchant distribution channels. We gained market space on the west coast vacated by Royalty Carpet Mills when they ceased operations during June of 2017. Gross Profit. Gross profit, as a percentage of net sales, increased 0.5 percentage points in 2017 compared with 2016. Despite the improved sales volumes in 2017, our gross profit was adversely affected by rising costs in raw materials and increased operating costs. We incurred startup costs related to several manufacturing initiatives including (1) adding yarn processing at our Atmore, Alabama facility, (2) installing a pre-coat line for our modular tile products, (3) completing our Colormaster beck dye and skein dye consolidation, and (4) starting up our Porterville yarn operation in California. With the completion of these initiatives, we have in place a foundation that will allow us to operate more efficiently and reduce waste costs. 18 Selling and Administrative Expenses. Selling and administrative expenses were $96.2 million in 2017 compared with $97.0 million in 2016, or a decrease of 1.1% as a percentage of sales. Selling and administrative expenses decreased as a percentage of sales primarily as a result of the higher sales volumes during 2017. In addition, selling and administrative expenses decreased as a result of lower sampling expenses in 2017 compared with 2016. Other Operating Expense, Net. Net other operating expense was an expense of $441 thousand in 2017 compared with expense of $401 thousand in 2016. Facility Consolidation and Severance Expenses, Net. Facility consolidation expenses were $636 thousand in 2017 compared with $1.5 million in the year-earlier period. Facility consolidation expenses decreased in 2017 as we completed our Warehousing, Distribution & Manufacturing Consolidation Plan during 2016. During 2017, we announced a Profit Improvement Plan which included the consolidation of our two commercial brands. This plan will consolidate the brands into one management team, sharing operations in sales, marketing, product development and manufacturing. As a result of this plan, we incurred expenses of $636 thousand during 2017 primarily related to severance costs. Operating Income (Loss). Operations reflected operating income of $4.0 million in 2017 compared with an operating loss of $3.4 million in 2016. Despite the improved sales volumes in 2017, our gross profit was adversely affected by rising costs in raw materials and increased operating costs. We incurred startup costs related to several manufacturing initiatives including (1) adding yarn processing at our Atmore, Alabama facility, (2) installing a pre-coat line for our modular tile products, (3) completing our Colormaster beck dye and skein dye consolidation, and (4) starting up our Porterville yarn operation in California. With the completion of these initiatives, we have in place a foundation that will allow us to operate more efficiently and reduce waste costs. In addition, we incurred expenses related to our Profit Improvement Plan during the year as we consolidated our two commercial brands. Interest Expense. Interest expense increased $347 thousand in 2017 principally due to higher levels of debt and higher rates than a year ago. Income Tax Provision (Benefit). On December 22, 2017, the President signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”). The Tax Act, among other things, lowered the U.S. corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018. Consequently, we wrote down our net deferred tax assets as of December 30, 2017 by $8.2 million to reflect the estimated impact of the Tax Act. This amount included a charge of $1.8 million related to the re-measurement of certain net deferred tax assets using the lower U.S. corporate income tax rate and a charge of $6.4 million to increase our valuation allowance related to our net deferred tax asset. The majority of the increase in the valuation allowance is related to the revised treatment of net operating losses under the Tax Act. Absent the impact of the Tax Act, our effective income tax benefit rate for 2017 would have been 36.4%. While we have substantially completed our provisional analysis of the income tax effects of the Tax Act and recorded a reasonable estimate of such effects, the charge related to the Tax Act may differ, possibly materially, due to, among other things, further refinement of our calculations, changes in interpretations and assumptions that we have made or additional guidance that may be issued related to the Tax Act. We will complete our analysis over a one-year measurement period from the enactment date, and any adjustments during this measurement period will be included in income from continuing operations as an adjustment to income tax expense in the reporting period when such adjustments are determined. Our effective income tax rate was a benefit of 41.0% in 2016. In 2016, we increased our valuation allowances by $106 thousand related to state income tax loss carryforwards and state income tax credit carryforwards. Additionally, 2016 included approximately $395 thousand of federal tax credits. Net Loss. Continuing operations reflected a loss of $9.3 million, or $0.59 per diluted share in 2017, compared with a loss from continuing operations of $5.2 million, or $0.33 per diluted share in 2016. Our discontinued operations reflected a loss of $233 thousand, or $0.01 per diluted share in 2017 compared with a loss of $131 thousand, or $0.01 per diluted share and income on disposal of discontinued operations of $60 thousand, or $0.00 per diluted share in 2016. Including discontinued operations, we had a net loss of $9.6 million, or $0.60 per diluted share, in 2017 compared with a net loss of $5.3 million, or $0.34 per diluted share, in 2016. 19 Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2016 Compared with Fiscal Year Ended December 26, 2015 Net sales Cost of sales Gross profit Fiscal Year Ended (amounts in thousands) December 31, 2016 % of Net Sales December 26, 2015 % of Net Sales Increase (Decrease) % Change $ 397,453 100.0 % $ 422,483 100.0 % $ (25,030) (5.9)% 302,028 76.0 % 316,253 74.9 % (14,225) (4.5)% 95,425 24.0 % 106,230 25.1 % (10,805) (10.2)% Selling and administrative expenses 96,983 24.4 % 100,422 23.8 % (3,439) (3.4)% Other operating expense, net Facility consolidation and severance expenses, net Operating income (loss) Interest expense Other expense, net Loss before taxes Income tax benefit 401 1,456 0.1 % 0.4 % (3,415) (0.9)% 5,392 22 1.4 % — % 872 2,946 1,990 4,935 47 0.2 % 0.7 % 0.4 % 1.2 % — % (471) (54.0)% (1,490) (50.6)% (5,405) (271.6)% 457 9.3 % (25) (53.2)% (8,829) (2.3)% (2,992) (0.8)% (5,837) 195.1 % (3,622) (0.9)% (714) (0.2)% (2,908) 407.3 % Loss from continuing operations (5,207) (1.4)% (2,278) (0.6)% (2,929) 128.6 % Loss from discontinued operations Income on disposal of discontinued operations (131) 60 — % — % (148) — — % — % 17 60 (11.5)% — % Net loss $ (5,278) (1.4)% $ (2,426) (0.6)% $ (2,852) 117.6 % Our fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 had 53 weeks and fiscal year ended December 26, 2015 had 52 weeks. Discussions below related to percentage changes in net sales for the annual periods have been adjusted to reflect the comparable number of weeks and are qualified with the term “net sales as adjusted”. For comparative purposes, we define "net sales as adjusted" as net sales less the last week of sales in a 53 week fiscal year. We believe “net sales as adjusted” will assist our financial statement users in obtaining comparable data between the reporting periods. (See reconciliation of net sales to net sales as adjusted in the table below.) Reconciliation of Net Sales to Net Sales as Adjusted Fiscal Year Ended (amounts in thousands) Net Sales December 31, 2016 Week 53 Net Sales as Adjusted December 31, 2016 Net Sales December 26, 2015 Increase (Decrease) Net Sales as Adjusted % Change Net sales as adjusted $ 397,453 $ (5,380) $ 392,073 $ 422,483 $ (30,410) (7.2)% Net Sales. Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $397.5 million compared with $422.5 million in the year-earlier period, a decrease of 5.9%, or 7.2% on a “net sales as adjusted” basis, for the year-over-year comparison. Sales for the carpet industry were down slightly for 2016 compared with the prior year. Our 2016 year-over-year carpet sales comparison reflected a decrease of 4.7%, or 6.0% on a “net sales as adjusted” basis, in net sales. Sales of residential carpet were down 1.8%, or 3.0% on a “net sales as adjusted” basis, and sales of commercial carpet decreased 10.0%, or 11.5% on a “net sales as adjusted” basis. Revenue from carpet yarn processing and carpet dyeing and finishing services decreased 45.4%, or 45.7% on a “net sales as adjusted” basis, in 2016 compared with 2015. We experienced weaker demand across all brands during 2016 compared with 2015. Cost of Sales. Cost of sales, as a percentage of net sales, increased 1.1 percentage points, as a percentage of net sales in 2016 compared with 2015. During 2015, we were challenged with high quality-related costs as we consolidated several of our facilities. In addition, we experienced high associate medical expenses. During 2016, we reduced our quality-related costs through several quality improvement initiatives and lowered our associate medical expenses with a new plan design. These improvements were substantially offset by unabsorbed fixed cost due to the lower sales volumes experienced in 2016. In addition, operations were impacted by the reduction of inventories as we under produced our sales volume, thus negatively affecting our cost structure during the year. 20 Gross Profit. Gross profit, as a percentage of net sales, decreased 1.1 percentage points in 2016 compared with 2015. The decrease in gross profit as a percentage of net sales was attributable to the factors discussed above. Selling and Administrative Expenses. Selling and administrative expenses were $97.0 million in 2016 compared with $100.4 million in 2015, or an increase of 0.6% as a percentage of sales. Selling and administrative expenses increased as a percentage of sales primarily as a result of the lower sales volumes offset in part to lower sample expenses during 2016. Other Operating Expense, Net. Net other operating (income) expense was an expense of $401 thousand in 2016 compared with expense of $872 thousand in 2015. We recognized a gain of $841 thousand from a settlement related to the 2010 BP oil spill offset by a $460 thousand expense related to the disposal of certain machinery and equipment. Facility Consolidation and Severance Expenses, Net. Facility consolidation expenses were $1.5 million in 2016 compared with $2.9 million in the year-earlier period. Facility consolidation expenses decreased in 2016 as we completed our consolidation plans during the year. During 2016, we initially accrued $690 thousand to finalize the cleanup of the site of our former waste water treatment plant that was disposed of in 2014. During the fourth quarter of 2016, we lowered the accrual by $359 thousand as we were able to refine the plan. Accordingly, if the actual costs are higher or lower, we would record an additional charge or benefit, respectively, as appropriate. Operating Income (Loss). Operations reflected an operating loss of $3.4 million in 2016 compared with operating income of $2.0 million in 2015. The increase in operating loss was attributable to the factors above. Interest Expense. Interest expense increased $457 thousand in 2016 principally due to long-term fixed interest rate swap contracts that are at higher rates than a year ago offset by lower levels of debt during 2016. Other Expense, Net. Other expense, net was an expense of $22 thousand compared with expense of $47 thousand in 2015. Income Tax Benefit. Our effective income tax rate was a benefit of 41.0% in 2016. In 2016, we increased our valuation allowances by $106 thousand related to state income tax loss carryforwards and state income tax credit carryforwards. Additionally, 2016 included approximately $395 thousand of federal tax credits. Our effective income tax rate was a benefit of 23.9% in 2015. In 2015, we increased our valuation allowances by $977 thousand related to state income tax loss carryforwards and state income tax credit carryforwards. Additionally, 2015 included approximately $441 thousand of federal tax credits. Net Loss. Continuing operations reflected a loss of $5.2 million, or $0.33 per diluted share in 2016, compared with a loss from continuing operations of $2.3 million, or $0.15 per diluted share in 2015. Our discontinued operations reflected a loss of $131 thousand, or $0.01 per diluted share and income on disposal of discontinued operations of $60 thousand, or $0.00 per diluted share in 2016 compared with a loss of $148 thousand, or $0.01 per diluted share in 2015. Including discontinued operations, we had a net loss of $5.3 million, or $0.34 per diluted share, in 2016 compared with a net loss of $2.4 million, or $0.16 per diluted share, in 2015. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES During the year ended December 30, 2017, cash used in operations was $9.6 million. Inventories increased $16.4 million, receivables increased $2.9 million and accounts payable and accrued expenses decreased $3.2 million. In order to better service our customers, we increased inventory levels. Receivables increased on higher sales volume. Capital asset acquisitions for the year ended December 30, 2017 were $13.6 million; $12.7 million of cash used in investing activities, $680 thousand of equipment acquired under capital leases and notes payable and $179 thousand for accrued purchases. Depreciation and amortization for the year ended December 30, 2017 were $12.9 million. We expect capital expenditures to be approximately $6.0 million in 2018 while depreciation and amortization is expected to be approximately $13.0 million. Planned capital expenditures in 2018 are primarily for new equipment. During the year ended December 30, 2017, cash provided by financing activities was $22.2 million. We had borrowings of $27.1 million on the revolving credit facility and $7.6 million on notes payables and payments of $10.7 million on notes payable and lease obligations. We believe our operating cash flows, credit availability under our revolving credit facility and other sources of financing are adequate to finance our anticipated liquidity requirements under current operating conditions. As of December 30, 2017, the unused borrowing availability under our revolving credit facility was $32.9 million. Our revolving credit facility requires us to maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.1 to 1.0 during any period that borrowing availability is less than $16.5 million. As of the date hereof, our fixed coverage ratio was less than 1.1 to 1.0, accordingly the unused availability accessible by us was $16.4 million (the amount above $16.5 million) at December 30, 2017. Significant additional cash expenditures above our normal liquidity requirements, significant deterioration in economic conditions or continued operating losses could affect our business and require supplemental financing or other funding sources. There can be no assurance that such supplemental financing or other sources of funding can be obtained or will be obtained on terms favorable to us. 21 Debt Facilities Revolving Credit Facility. The revolving credit facility provides for a maximum of $150.0 million of revolving credit, subject to borrowing base availability. The borrowing base is currently equal to specified percentages of our eligible accounts receivable, inventories, fixed assets and real property less reserves established, from time to time, by the administrative agent under the facility. The revolving credit facility matures on September 23, 2021. The revolving credit facility is secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of our assets. At our election, advances of the revolving credit facility bear interest at annual rates equal to either (a) LIBOR for 1, 2 or 3 month periods, as selected by us, plus an applicable margin ranging between 1.50% and 2.00%, or (b) the higher of the prime rate, the Federal Funds rate plus 0.5%, or a daily LIBOR rate plus 1.00%, plus an applicable margin ranging between 0.50% and 1.00%. The applicable margin is determined based on availability under the revolving credit facility with margins increasing as availability decreases. As of December 30, 2017, the applicable margin on our revolving credit facility was 1.75%. We pay an unused line fee on the average amount by which the aggregate commitments exceed utilization of the revolving credit facility equal to 0.375% per annum. The weighted-average interest rate on borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility was 4.12% at December 30, 2017 and 4.40% at December 31, 2016. The revolving credit facility includes certain affirmative and negative covenants that impose restrictions on our financial and business operations. The revolving credit facility restricts our borrowing availability if our fixed charge coverage ratio is less than 1.1 to 1.0. During any period that our fixed charge coverage ratio is less than 1.1 to 1.0, our borrowing availability is reduced by $16.5 million. As of December 30, 2017, the unused borrowing availability under the revolving credit facility was $32.9 million; however, since our fixed charge coverage ratio was less than 1.1 to 1.0, the unused availability accessible by us was $16.4 million (the amount above $16.5 million) at December 30, 2017. Notes Payable - Buildings. On November 7, 2014, we entered into a ten-year $8.3 million note payable to purchase a previously leased distribution center in Adairsville, Georgia. The note payable is scheduled to mature on November 7, 2024 and is secured by the distribution center. The note payable bears interest at a variable rate equal to one month LIBOR plus 2.0% and is payable in equal monthly installments of principal of $35 thousand, plus interest calculated on the declining balance of the note, with a final payment of $4.2 million due on maturity. In addition, we entered into an interest swap with an amortizing notional amount effective November 7, 2014 which effectively fixes the interest rate at 4.50%. On January 23, 2015, we entered into a ten-year $6.3 million note payable to finance an owned facility in Saraland, Alabama. The note payable is scheduled to mature on January 7, 2025 and is secured by the facility. The note payable bears interest at a variable rate equal to one month LIBOR plus 2.0% and is payable in equal monthly installments of principal of $26 thousand, plus interest calculated on the declining balance of the note, with a final payment of $3.1 million due on maturity. In addition, we entered into a forward interest rate swap with an amortizing $5.7 million notional amount effective January 7, 2017 which effectively fixes the interest rate at 4.30%. Acquisition Note Payable - Development Authority of Gordon County. On November 2, 2012, we signed a 6% seller-financed note of $5.5 million with Lineage PCR, Inc. (“Lineage”) related to the acquisition of the continuous carpet dyeing facility in Calhoun, Georgia. Effective December 28, 2012 through a series of agreements between us, the Development Authority of Gordon County, Georgia (the “Authority”) and Lineage, obligations with identical payment terms as the original note to Lineage were now payment obligations to the Authority. These transactions were consummated in order to provide us with a tax abatement to the related real estate and equipment at this facility. The tax abatement plan provided for abatement for certain components of the real and personal property taxes for up to ten years. At any time, we had the option to pay off the obligation, plus a nominal amount. The debt to the Authority bore interest at 6% and was payable in equal monthly installments of principal and interest of $106 thousand over 57 months. The note matured on November 2, 2017 and the final installment was paid at that time. Acquisition Note Payable - Robertex. On July 1, 2013, we signed a 4.5% seller-financed note of $4.0 million, which was recorded at a fair value of $3.7 million with Robert P. Rothman related to the acquisition of Robertex Associates, LLC ("Robertex") in Calhoun, Georgia. The note is payable in five annual installments of principal of $800 thousand plus interest. The note matures June 30, 2018. Notes Payable - Equipment and Other. Our equipment financing notes have terms ranging from one to seven years, bear interest ranging from 1.00% to 7.68% and are due in monthly or quarterly installments through their maturity dates. The notes are secured by the specific equipment financed and do not contain financial covenants. (See Note 9 to our Consolidated Financial Statements). Capital Lease Obligations. Our capital lease obligations have terms ranging from three to seven years, bear interest ranging from 3.55% to 7.37% and are due in monthly or quarterly installments through their maturity dates. The capital lease obligations are secured by the specific equipment leased. (See Note 9 to our Consolidated Financial Statements). 22 Contractual Obligations The following table summarizes our future minimum payments under contractual obligations as of December 30, 2017 Payments Due By Period (dollars in millions) Debt Interest - debt (1) Capital leases Interest - capital leases Operating leases Purchase commitments Totals 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Thereafter Total $ $ 5.5 5.0 4.3 0.7 3.7 1.1 $ 2.8 4.8 3.4 0.5 2.9 — 1.9 4.8 3.2 0.3 2.4 — $ 99.4 $ 3.6 2.5 0.2 1.9 — 20.3 14.4 12.6 107.6 $ 1.0 0.4 0.9 0.1 1.4 — 3.8 8.8 0.7 0.2 — 3.5 — 119.4 19.3 14.5 1.8 15.8 1.1 13.2 171.9 (1) Interest rates used for variable rate debt were those in effect at December 30, 2017. Stock-Based Awards We recognize compensation expense related to share-based stock awards based on the fair value of the equity instrument over the period of vesting for the individual stock awards that were granted. At December 30, 2017, the total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested restricted stock awards was $1.4 million with a weighted-average vesting period of 7.3 years. At December 30, 2017, the total unrecognized compensation expense related to Directors' Stock Performance Units was $34 thousand with a weighted-average vesting period of 0.3 years. At December 30, 2017, the total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock options was $211 thousand with a weighted-average vesting period of 1.4 years. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements We have no off-balance sheet arrangements at December 30, 2017 or December 31, 2016. Income Tax Considerations On December 22, 2017, the President signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”). The Tax Act, among other things, lowered the U.S. corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018. Consequently, we wrote down our net deferred tax assets as of December 30, 2017 by $8.2 million to reflect the estimated impact of the Tax Act. This amount included a charge of $1.8 million related to the re-measurement of certain net deferred tax assets using the lower U.S. corporate income tax rate and a charge of $6.4 million to increase our valuation allowance related to our net deferred tax asset. The majority of the increase in the valuation allowance is related to the revised treatment of net operating losses under the Tax Act. While we have substantially completed our provisional analysis of the income tax effects of the Tax Act and recorded a reasonable estimate of such effects, the charge related to the Tax Act may differ, possibly materially, due to, among other things, further refinement of our calculations, changes in interpretations and assumptions that we have made or additional guidance that may be issued related to the Tax Act. We will complete our analysis over a one-year measurement period from the enactment date, and any adjustments during this measurement period will be included in income from continuing operations as an adjustment to income tax expense in the reporting period when such adjustments are determined. During 2018 and 2019, we do not anticipate any cash outlays for income taxes. This is due to tax loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards that will be used to offset taxable income. At December 30, 2017, we were in a net deferred tax liability position of $1.1 million. Discontinued Operations - Environmental Contingencies We have reserves for environmental obligations established at five previously owned sites that were associated with our discontinued textile businesses. We have a reserve of $1.7 million for environmental liabilities at these sites as of December 30, 2017. The liability established represents our best estimate of loss and is the reasonable amount to which there is any meaningful degree of certainty given the periods of estimated remediation and the dollars applicable to such remediation for those periods. The actual timeline to remediate, and thus, the ultimate cost to complete such remediation through these remediation efforts, may differ significantly from our estimates. Pre-tax cost for environmental remediation obligations classified as discontinued operations were primarily a result of specific events requiring action and additional expense in each period. 23 Fair Value of Financial Instruments At December 30, 2017, we had $25 thousand of liabilities measured at fair value that fall under a level 3 classification in the hierarchy (those subject to significant management judgment or estimation). Certain Related Party Transactions During 2017, we purchased a portion of our product needs in the form of fiber, yarn and carpet from Engineered Floors, an entity substantially controlled by Robert E. Shaw, a shareholder of our company. An affiliate of Mr. Shaw reported holding approximately 7.4% of our Common Stock, which as of year-end represented approximately 3.5% of the total vote of all classes of our Common Stock. Engineered Floors is one of several suppliers of such materials. Total purchases from Engineered Floors for 2017, 2016 and 2015 were approximately $7.2 million, $7.3 million and $8.8 million, respectively; or approximately 2.3%, 2.4% and 2.8% of our consolidated costs of sales in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Purchases from Engineered Floors are based on market value, negotiated prices. We have no contractual commitments with Mr. Shaw associated with our business relationship with Engineered Floors. Transactions with Engineered Floors are reviewed annually by our board of directors. We are party to a 5-year lease with the seller of Atlas Carpet Mills, Inc. to lease three manufacturing facilities as part of the acquisition in 2014. The lessor is controlled by an associate of our company. Rent paid to the lessor during 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $978 thousand, $793 thousand and $458 thousand, respectively. The lease was based on current market values for similar facilities. We are party to a 10-year lease with the Rothman Family Partnership to lease a manufacturing facility as part of the Robertex acquisition in 2013. The lessor is controlled by an associate of our company. Rent paid to the lessor during 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $273 thousand, $267 thousand and $262 thousand, respectively. The lease was based on current market values for similar facilities. In addition, we have a note payable to Robert P. Rothman related to the acquisition of Robertex, Inc. (See Note 9 to our Consolidated Financial Statements). Recent Accounting Pronouncements See Note 2 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-K for a discussion of new accounting pronouncements which is incorporated herein by reference. Critical Accounting Policies Certain estimates and assumptions are made when preparing our financial statements. Estimates involve judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic factors that are difficult to predict. As a result, actual amounts could differ from estimates made when our financial statements are prepared. The Securities and Exchange Commission requires management to identify its most critical accounting policies, defined as those that are both most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and operating results and the application of which requires our most difficult, subjective, and complex judgments. Although our estimates have not differed materially from our experience, such estimates pertain to inherently uncertain matters that could result in material differences in subsequent periods. We believe application of the following accounting policies require significant judgments and estimates and represent our critical accounting policies. Other significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements. • Revenue recognition. Revenues, including shipping and handling amounts, are recognized when the following criteria are met: there is persuasive evidence that a sales agreement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and collection is reasonably assured. Delivery is considered to have occurred when the customer takes title to products, which is generally on the date of shipment. At the time revenue is recognized, we record a provision for the estimated amount of future returns including product warranties and customer claims based primarily on historical experience and any known trends or conditions. • Customer claims and product warranties. We provide product warranties related to manufacturing defects and specific performance standards for our products. We record reserves for the estimated costs of defective products and failure to meet applicable performance standards. The levels of reserves are established based primarily upon historical experience and our evaluation of pending claims. Because our evaluations are based on historical experience and conditions at the time our financial statements are prepared, actual results could differ from the reserves in our Consolidated Financial Statements. • Accounts receivable allowances. We provide allowances for expected cash discounts and doubtful accounts based upon historical experience and periodic evaluations of the financial condition of our customers. If the financial conditions of our customers were to significantly deteriorate, or other factors impair their ability to pay their debts, credit losses could differ from allowances recorded in our Consolidated Financial Statements. 24 • Inventories. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the last-in, first-out method (LIFO), which generally matches current costs of inventory sold with current revenues, for substantially all inventories. Reserves are also established to adjust inventories that are off-quality, aged or obsolete to their estimated net realizable value. Additionally, rates of recoverability per unit of off-quality, aged or obsolete inventory are estimated based on historical rates of recoverability and other known conditions or circumstances that may affect future recoverability. Actual results could differ from assumptions used to value our inventory. • Goodwill. Goodwill is tested annually for impairment during the fourth quarter or earlier if significant events or substantive changes in circumstances occur that may indicate that goodwill may not be recoverable. The goodwill impairment tests are based on determining the fair value of the specified reporting units based on management judgments and assumptions using the discounted cash flows and comparable company market valuation approaches. We have identified our reporting unit as our floorcovering business for the purposes of allocating goodwill and assessing impairments. The valuation approaches are subject to key judgments and assumptions that are sensitive to change such as judgments and assumptions about sales growth rates, operating margins, the weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”), synergies from the viewpoint of a market participant and comparable company market multiples. When developing these key judgments and assumptions, we consider economic, operational and market conditions that could impact the fair value of the reporting unit. However, estimates are inherently uncertain and represent only management’s reasonable expectations regarding future developments. These estimates and the judgments and assumptions upon which the estimates are based will, in all likelihood, differ in some respects from actual future results. If we were unable to maintain cash flow at current levels for a prolonged period of time, we could fail to meet our goodwill tests. We are concentrated in the soft floorcovering part of the market and this area of the market has been shrinking. If we are unable to develop products that allow us to maintain or enhance our position in the upper end of the soft floorcovering portion of the market or are unable to generate growth through the offering of hard surface products we could lose the ability to generate sufficient cash flows to justify our calculations. Should a significant or prolonged deterioration in economic conditions occur, a substantial increase in our cost of capital occur or a decline in comparable company market multiples, then key judgments and assumptions could be impacted. We performed our annual assessment of goodwill in the fourth quarters of 2017, 2016 and 2015 and no impairment was indicated. In addition, at December 30, 2017, our reporting segment was not at risk of failing the goodwill impairment test. The estimated fair value exceeded the carrying amount at the date of testing in excess of 30%. • • Self-insured accruals. We estimate costs required to settle claims related to our self-insured medical, dental and workers' compensation plans. These estimates include costs to settle known claims, as well as incurred and unreported claims. The estimated costs of known and unreported claims are based on historical experience. Actual results could differ from assumptions used to estimate these accruals. Income taxes. Our effective tax rate is based on income, statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available in the jurisdictions in which we operate. Tax laws are complex and subject to different interpretations by the taxpayer and respective governmental taxing authorities. Deferred tax assets represent amounts available to reduce income taxes payable on taxable income in a future period. We evaluate the recoverability of these future tax benefits by assessing the adequacy of future expected taxable income from all sources, including reversal of taxable temporary differences, forecasted operating earnings and available tax planning strategies. These sources of income inherently rely on estimates, including business forecasts and other projections of financial results over an extended period of time. In the event that we are not able to realize all or a portion of our deferred tax assets in the future, a valuation allowance is provided. We recognize such amounts through a charge to income in the period in which that determination is made or when tax law changes are enacted. We had valuation allowances of $13.0 million at December 30, 2017 and $5.4 million at December 31, 2016. On December 22, 2017, the President signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”). The Tax Act, among other things, lowered the U.S. corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018. Consequently, we wrote down our net deferred tax assets as of December 30, 2017 by $8.2 million to reflect the estimated impact of the Tax Act. This amount included a charge of $1.8 million related to the re-measurement of certain net deferred tax assets using the lower U.S. corporate income tax rate and a charge of $6.4 million to increase our valuation allowance related to our net deferred tax asset. The majority of the increase in the valuation allowance is related to the revised treatment of net operating losses under the Tax Act. While we have substantially completed our provisional analysis of the income tax effects of the Tax Act and recorded a reasonable estimate of such effects, the charge related to the Tax Act may differ, possibly materially, due to, among other things, further refinement of our calculations, changes in interpretations and assumptions that we have made or additional guidance that may be issued related to the Tax Act. We will complete our analysis over a one-year measurement period from the enactment date, and any adjustments during this measurement period will be included in income from continuing operations as an adjustment to income tax expense in the reporting period when such adjustments are determined. At December 30, 2017, we were in a net deferred tax liability position of $1.1 million. For further information regarding our valuation allowances, see Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements and for information regarding our assumption of future taxable income see Income Tax Considerations included in this report. • Loss contingencies. We routinely assess our exposure related to legal matters, environmental matters, product liabilities or any other claims against our assets that may arise in the normal course of business. If we determine that it is probable a loss has been incurred, the amount of the loss, or an amount within the range of loss, that can be reasonably estimated will be recorded. 25 Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK (Dollars in thousands) Our earnings, cash flows and financial position are exposed to market risks relating to interest rates, among other factors. It is our policy to minimize our exposure to adverse changes in interest rates and manage interest rate risks inherent in funding our Company with debt. We address this financial exposure through a risk management program that includes maintaining a mix of fixed and floating rate debt and the use of interest rate swap agreements (See Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). At December 30, 2017, $47,708, or approximately 36% of our total debt, was subject to floating interest rates. A one-hundred basis point fluctuation in the variable interest rates applicable to this floating rate debt would have an annual pre-tax impact of approximately $477. Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA The supplementary financial information required by ITEM 302 of Regulation S-K is included in PART II, ITEM 5 of this report and the Financial Statements are included in a separate section of this report. Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE None. Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES (a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. We maintain disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our management, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such terms are defined in Rules 13(a)-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e)) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) as of December 30, 2017, the date of the financial statements included in this Form 10-K (the “Evaluation Date”). Based on that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the Evaluation Date. (b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. No changes in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarter covered by this report that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives because of its inherent limitations. Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures, as well as diverse interpretation of U. S. generally accepted accounting principles by accounting professionals. It is also possible that internal control over financial reporting can be circumvented by collusion or improper management override. Because of such limitations, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. Furthermore, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. These inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process; therefore, while it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce such risk, it is not possible to eliminate all risk. Our management report on internal control over financial reporting is contained in Item 15(a)(1) of this report. Item 9B. OTHER INFORMATION None. 26 PART III. Item 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE The sections entitled "Information about Nominees for Director" and "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" in the Proxy Statement of the registrant for the annual meeting of shareholders to be held May 2, 2018 are incorporated herein by reference. Information regarding the executive officers of the registrant is presented in PART I of this report. We adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the "Code of Ethics") which applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer or controller, and any persons performing similar functions. A copy of the Code of Ethics is incorporated by reference herein as Exhibit 14 to this report. Audit Committee Financial Expert The Board has determined that Michael L. Owens is an audit committee financial expert as defined by Item 407 (e)(5) of Regulation S-K of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is independent within the meaning of the applicable Securities and Exchange Commission rules and NASDAQ standards. For a brief listing of Mr. Owens' relevant experience, please refer to the "Election of Directors" section of the Company's Proxy Statement. Audit Committee We have a standing audit committee. At December 30, 2017, members of our audit committee are Michael L. Owens, Chairman, William F. Blue, Jr., Charles E. Brock, Walter W. Hubbard, Lowry F. Kline, Hilda W. Murray and John W. Murrey, III. Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION The sections entitled "Compensation Discussion and Analysis", "Executive Compensation Information" and "Director Compensation" in the Proxy Statement of the registrant for the annual meeting of shareholders to be held May 2, 2018 are incorporated herein by reference. Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS The section entitled "Principal Shareholders", as well as the beneficial ownership table (and accompanying notes), in the Proxy Statement of the registrant for the annual meeting of shareholders to be held May 2, 2018 are incorporated herein by reference. Equity Compensation Plan Information as of December 30, 2017 The following table sets forth information as to our equity compensation plans as of the end of the 2017 fiscal year: Plan Category (a) Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of the outstanding options, warrants and rights (b) Weighted- average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (c) Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a) Equity Compensation Plans approved by security holders 447,932 (1) $ 5.02 (2) 486,600 (1) (2) Includes the options to purchase 103,500 shares and 203,000 shares of Common Stock under our 2006 Stock Awards Plan and 2016 Stock Awards Plan, respectively, and 141,432 Performance Units issued under the 2016 Stock Awards Plan, each unit being equivalent to one share of Common Stock. Does not include shares of Common Stock issued but not vested pursuant to outstanding restricted stock awards. Includes the aggregate weighted-average of (i) the exercise price per share for outstanding options to purchase 103,500 shares and 203,000 shares of Common Stock under our 2006 Stock Awards Plan and 2016 Stock Awards Plan, respectively, and (ii) the price per share of the Common Stock on the grant date for each of 141,432 Performance Units issued under the 2016 Stock Awards Plan (each unit equivalent to one share of Common Stock). Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE The section entitled "Certain Transactions Between the Company and Directors and Officers" in the Proxy Statement of the registrant for the annual meeting of shareholders to be held May 2, 2018 is incorporated herein by reference. Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES The section entitled "Audit Fees Discussion" in the Proxy Statement of the Registrant for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 2, 2018 is incorporated herein by reference. 27 Item 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES PART IV. (a) (1) Financial Statements - The response to this portion of Item 15 is submitted as a separate section of this report. (2) Financial Statement Schedules - The response to this portion of Item 15 is submitted as a separate section of this report. (3) Exhibits - Please refer to the Exhibit Index which is attached hereto. (b) Exhibits - The response to this portion of Item 15 is submitted as a separate section of this report. See Item 15(a)(3) above. (c) Financial Statement Schedules - The response to this portion of Item 15 is submitted as a separate section of this report. See Item 15(a)(2). Item 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY None. 28 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. Date: March 13, 2018 The Dixie Group, Inc. /s/ DANIEL K. FRIERSON By: Daniel K. Frierson Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. Signature Capacity Date /s/ DANIEL K. FRIERSON Chairman of the Board, Director and Chief Executive Officer March 13, 2018 Daniel K. Frierson /s/ JON A. FAULKNER Vice President, Chief Financial Officer March 13, 2018 Jon A. Faulkner /s/ D. KENNEDY FRIERSON, JR. Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Director March 13, 2018 D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr. /s/ WILLIAM F. BLUE, JR. Director William F. Blue, Jr. /s/ CHARLES E. BROCK Director Charles E. Brock /s/ WALTER W. HUBBARD Director Walter W. Hubbard /s/ LOWRY F. KLINE Lowry F. Kline Director /s/ HILDA S. MURRAY Director Hilda S. Murray /s/ JOHN W. MURREY, III Director John W. Murrey, III /s/ MICHAEL L. OWENS Director Michael L. Owens 29 March 13, 2018 March 13, 2018 March 13, 2018 March 13, 2018 March 13, 2018 March 13, 2018 March 13, 2018 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K ITEM 8 AND ITEM 15(a)(1) AND ITEM 15(a)(2) LIST OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 30, 2017 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. DALTON, GEORGIA 30 FORM 10-K - ITEM 8 and ITEM 15(a)(1) and (2) THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES LIST OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES The following consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of The Dixie Group, Inc. and subsidiaries are included in Item 8 and Item 15(a)(1) and 15(c): Table of Contents Management's report on internal control over financial reporting Report of independent registered public accounting firm Consolidated balance sheets - December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 Consolidated statements of operations - Years ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016, and December 26, 2015 Consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) - Years ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016, and December 26, 2015 Consolidated statements of cash flows - Years ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016, and December 26, 2015 Consolidated statements of stockholders' equity - Years ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016, and December 26, 2015 Notes to consolidated financial statements Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts Page 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 66 All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions, or are inapplicable, or the information is otherwise shown in the financial statements or notes thereto, and therefore such schedules have been omitted. 31 Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives because of its inherent limitations. Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures, as well as diverse interpretation of U. S. generally accepted accounting principles by accounting professionals. It is also possible that internal control over financial reporting can be circumvented by collusion or improper management override. Because of such limitations, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. Furthermore, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. These inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process; therefore, while it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce such risk, it is not possible to eliminate all risk. Management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has used the criteria set forth in the report entitled “Internal Control - Integrated Framework” published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) to evaluate the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting. Management has concluded that its internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 30, 2017, based on those criteria. /s/ Daniel K. Frierson Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer /s/ Jon A. Faulkner Chief Financial Officer 32 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Shareholders and the Board of Directors of The Dixie Group, Inc. Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of The Dixie Group, Inc. (the "Company") as of December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 30, 2017, and the related notes and schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(2) (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 30, 2017, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Basis for Opinion These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. /s/ Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP We have served as the Company's auditor since 2013. Atlanta, Georgia March 13, 2018 33 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (amounts in thousands, except share data) ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents Receivables, net Inventories, net Prepaid expenses TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLES OTHER ASSETS TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY CURRENT LIABILITIES Accounts payable Accrued expenses Current portion of long-term debt TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES LONG-TERM DEBT OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES TOTAL LIABILITIES December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 $ 19 $ 46,480 113,657 3,600 163,756 93,785 5,850 19,447 140 43,605 97,237 4,376 145,358 92,807 6,156 24,666 $ $ 282,838 $ 268,987 $ 18,541 30,291 9,811 58,643 123,446 21,486 203,575 20,683 32,826 10,122 63,631 98,256 19,978 181,865 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (See Note 17) STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Common Stock ($3 par value per share): Authorized 80,000,000 shares, issued and outstanding - 15,279,812 shares for 2017 and 15,248,338 shares for 2016 45,839 45,745 Class B Common Stock ($3 par value per share): Authorized 16,000,000 shares, issued and outstanding - 861,499 shares for 2017 and 870,714 shares for 2016 Additional paid-in capital Accumulated deficit Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 2,584 157,139 (125,000) (1,299) 79,263 2,612 156,381 (115,656) (1,960) 87,122 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $ 282,838 $ 268,987 See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements. 34 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (amounts in thousands, except per share data) Year Ended December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015 $ 412,462 $ 397,453 $ 311,249 101,213 96,171 441 636 3,965 5,739 39 (1,813) 7,509 (9,322) (233) — 302,028 95,425 96,983 401 1,456 (3,415) 5,392 22 (8,829) (3,622) (5,207) (131) 60 422,483 316,253 106,230 100,422 872 2,946 1,990 4,935 47 (2,992) (714) (2,278) (148) — $ $ $ $ $ $ (9,555) $ (5,278) $ (2,426) (0.59) $ (0.33) $ (0.01) — (0.01) 0.00 (0.60) $ (0.34) $ (0.15) (0.01) — (0.16) 15,699 15,638 15,536 (0.59) $ (0.33) $ (0.01) — (0.01) 0.00 (0.60) $ (0.34) $ (0.15) (0.01) — (0.16) 15,699 15,638 15,536 — $ — — $ — — — NET SALES Cost of sales GROSS PROFIT Selling and administrative expenses Other operating expense, net Facility consolidation and severance expenses, net OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) Interest expense Other expense, net LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE TAXES Income tax provision (benefit) LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax Income on disposal of discontinued operations, net of tax NET LOSS BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE: Continuing operations Discontinued operations Disposal of discontinued operations Net loss BASIC SHARES OUTSTANDING DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE: Continuing operations Discontinued operations Disposal of discontinued operations Net loss DILUTED SHARES OUTSTANDING DIVIDENDS PER SHARE: Common Stock Class B Common Stock See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements. 35 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (amounts in thousands) NET LOSS OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF TAX: Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps Income taxes Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps, net Reclassification of loss into earnings from interest rate swaps (1) Income taxes Reclassification of loss into earnings from interest rate swaps, net Unrecognized net actuarial gain (loss) on postretirement benefit plans Income taxes Unrecognized net actuarial gain (loss) on postretirement benefit plans, net Reclassification of net actuarial gain into earnings from postretirement benefit plans (2) Income taxes Reclassification of net actuarial gain into earnings from postretirement benefit plans, net Reclassification of prior service credits into earnings from postretirement benefit plans (2) Income taxes Reclassification of prior service credits into earnings from postretirement benefit plans, net Year Ended December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015 $ (9,555) $ (5,278) $ (2,426) 180 68 112 1,250 475 775 11 4 7 (30) (11) (19) (4) (1) (3) (263) (100) (163) 1,291 491 800 (3) (1) (2) (33) (13) (20) (4) (2) (2) (2,410) (916) (1,494) 777 295 482 48 18 30 (40) (15) (25) (86) (33) (53) TOTAL OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF TAX 872 613 (1,060) COMPREHENSIVE LOSS $ (8,683) $ (4,665) $ (3,486) (1) Amounts for cash flow hedges reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to net loss were included in interest expense in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Operations. (2) Amounts for postretirement plans reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to net loss were included in selling and administrative expenses in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Operations. See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements. 36 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (amounts in thousands) December 30, 2017 Year Ended December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015 $ (9,322) $ (233) — (9,555) (5,207) $ (131) 60 (5,278) (2,278) (148) — (2,426) CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES Loss from continuing operations Loss from discontinued operations Income on disposal of discontinued operations Net loss Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization Provision (benefit) for deferred income taxes Net loss (gain) on property, plant and equipment disposals Stock-based compensation expense Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation Bad debt expense Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Receivables Inventories Other current assets Accounts payable and accrued expenses Other operating assets and liabilities NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES Net proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment Purchase of property, plant and equipment NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES Net borrowings (payments) on revolving credit facility Borrowings on notes payable - buildings Payments on notes payable - buildings Payments on notes payable related to acquisitions Borrowings on notes payable - equipment and other Payments on notes payable - equipment and other Payments on capital leases Change in outstanding checks in excess of cash Proceeds from exercise of stock options Repurchases of Common Stock Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation Payments for debt issuance costs NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES 12,947 8,181 170 940 — 70 (2,945) (16,420) 776 (3,161) (609) (9,606) — (12,724) (12,724) 27,125 — (731) (1,920) 7,612 (4,145) (3,921) (1,695) — (116) — — 22,209 13,515 (3,260) 725 1,324 (3) 38 7,163 17,909 (1,014) (6,827) (371) 23,921 1 (4,904) (4,903) (9,986) — (731) (1,924) 2,674 (4,653) (3,171) (932) — (152) 3 (287) (19,159) 14,119 (730) (114) 1,406 (318) 146 (335) (10,939) 751 7,606 (557) 8,609 68 (6,826) (6,758) (2,328) 6,290 (705) (1,840) 1,923 (4,387) (2,742) 1,816 275 (584) 318 — (1,964) (113) 394 281 496 2,850 1,857 200 (102) 93 DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD $ (121) 140 19 $ (141) 281 140 $ SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION: Equipment purchased under capital leases Equipment purchased under notes payable Deposits utilized on purchased equipment, net Accrued purchases of equipment Shortfall of tax benefits from stock-based compensation Note receivable on sale of equipment See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements. 621 59 — 179 — — 169 — — 258 (192) — 37 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (amounts in thousands, except share data) Balance at December 27, 2014 $ 45,022 $ 2,293 $ 155,127 $ (107,952) $ (1,513) $ 92,977 Common Stock Class B Common Stock Additional Paid-In Capital Accumulated Deficit Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Total Stockholders' Equity Common Stock issued - 53,372 shares Common Stock issued under Directors' Stock Plan - 30,738 Repurchases of Common Stock - 64,304 shares Restricted stock grants issued - 224,625 shares Restricted stock grants forfeited - 9,078 shares Class B converted into Common Stock - 28,459 shares Stock-based compensation expense Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation Net loss Other comprehensive loss 161 92 (193) 326 (27) 85 — — — — — — — 347 — (85) — — — — 114 (92) (391) (673) 27 — 1,406 216 — — — — — — — — — — (2,426) — Balance at December 26, 2015 45,466 2,555 155,734 (110,378) Repurchases of Common Stock - 35,815 shares Restricted stock grants issued - 149,215 shares Restricted stock grants forfeited - 1,314 shares Class B converted into Common Stock - 12,144 shares Stock-based compensation expense Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation Net loss Other comprehensive income (107) 354 (4) 36 — — — — — 93 — (36) — — — — (45) (447) 4 — 1,324 (189) — — — — — — — — (5,278) — — — — — — — — — — (1,060) (2,573) — — — — — — — 613 275 — (584) — — — 1,406 216 (2,426) (1,060) 90,804 (152) — — — 1,324 (189) (5,278) 613 Balance at December 31, 2016 45,745 2,612 156,381 (115,656) (1,960) 87,122 Repurchases of Common Stock - 33,112 shares Restricted stock grants issued - 60,000 shares Restricted stock grants forfeited - 4,629 shares Class B converted into Common Stock - 9,215 shares Stock-based compensation expense Net loss Other comprehensive income Reclassification of stranded tax effects (100) 180 (14) 28 — — — — — — — (28) — — — — (16) (180) 12 — 942 — — — — — — — — (9,555) — 211 — — — — — — 872 (211) (116) — (2) — 942 (9,555) 872 — Balance at December 30, 2017 $ 45,839 $ 2,584 $ 157,139 $ (125,000) $ (1,299) $ 79,263 See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements. 38 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (amounts in thousands, except per share data) NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Business The Company's businesses consist principally of marketing, manufacturing and selling finished carpet, rugs and luxury vinyl flooring in the domestic floorcovering market. The Company sells floorcovering products in both residential and commercial applications. Additionally, the Company provides manufacturing support to its carpet businesses through its separate processing operations. Based on applicable accounting standards, the Company has determined that it has one reportable segment, Floorcovering comprising of two operating segments, Residential and Commercial. Pursuant to accounting standards, the Company has aggregated the two operating segments into one reporting segment because they have similar economic characteristics, and the operating segments are similar in all of the following areas: (a) the nature of the products and services; (b) the nature of the production processes; (c) the type or class of customer for their products and services; (d) the methods used to distribute their products or provide their services; and (e) the nature of the regulatory environment. Principles of Consolidation The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of The Dixie Group, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the "Company"). Significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("U.S. GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates and these differences could be material. Fiscal Year The Company ends its fiscal year on the last Saturday of December. All references herein to "2017," "2016," and "2015," mean the fiscal years ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016, and December 26, 2015, respectively. The year 2016 contained 53 weeks, all other years presented contained 52 weeks. Reclassifications The Company reclassified certain amounts in 2016 and 2015 to conform to the 2017 presentation. Discontinued Operations The financial statements separately report discontinued operations and the results of continuing operations (See Note 20). Cash and Cash Equivalents Highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less when purchased are reported as cash equivalents. Market Risk The Company sells carpet to floorcovering retailers, the interior design, architectural and specifier communities and supplies carpet yarn and carpet dyeing and finishing services to certain manufacturers. The Company's customers are located principally throughout the United States. As a percentage of net sales, one customer accounted for approximately 14% in 2017, 10% in 2016 and 9% in 2015. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of net sales in 2017, 2016, or 2015, nor did the Company make a significant amount of sales to foreign countries during 2017, 2016, or 2015. Credit Risk The Company grants credit to its customers with defined payment terms, performs ongoing evaluations of the credit worthiness of its customers and generally does not require collateral. Accounts receivable are carried at their outstanding principal amounts, less an anticipated amount for discounts and an allowance for doubtful accounts, which management believes is sufficient to cover potential credit losses based on historical experience and periodic evaluation of the financial condition of the Company's customers. As a percentage of customer's trade accounts receivable, one customer accounted for approximately 31% in 2017 and 28% in 39 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (amounts in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) 2016. Notes receivable are carried at their outstanding principal amounts, less an allowance for doubtful accounts to cover potential credit losses based on the financial condition of borrowers and collateral held by the Company. Inventories Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the last-in, first-out ("LIFO") method, which generally matches current costs of inventory sold with current revenues, for substantially all inventories. Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant and equipment are stated at the lower of cost or impaired value. Provisions for depreciation and amortization of property, plant and equipment have been computed for financial reporting purposes using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, ranging from 10 to 40 years for buildings and improvements, and 3 to 10 years for machinery and equipment. Costs to repair and maintain the Company's equipment and facilities are expensed as incurred. Such costs typically include expenditures to maintain equipment and facilities in good repair and proper working condition. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment when circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be fully recoverable. When the carrying value of the asset exceeds the value of its estimated undiscounted future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized equal to the difference between the asset's carrying value and its fair value. Fair value is estimated using discounted cash flows, prices for similar assets or other valuation techniques. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over the fair value of identified net assets acquired in business combinations. In accordance with the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification Topic ("ASC") 350, “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other,” the Company tests goodwill for impairment annually in the fourth quarter of each year or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of goodwill associated with a reporting unit may not be fully recoverable. The goodwill impairment tests are based on determining the fair value of the specified reporting units based on management judgments and assumptions using the discounted cash flows and comparable company market valuation approaches. The Company has identified its reporting unit as its floorcovering business for the purposes of allocating goodwill and assessing impairments. The valuation approaches are subject to key judgments and assumptions that are sensitive to change such as judgments and assumptions about sales growth rates, operating margins, the weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”) and comparable company market multiples. When developing these key judgments and assumptions, the Company considers economic, operational and market conditions that could impact the fair value of the reporting unit. However, estimates are inherently uncertain and represent only management’s reasonable expectations regarding future developments. These estimates and the judgments and assumptions upon which the estimates are based will, in all likelihood, differ in some respects from actual future results. Should a significant or prolonged deterioration in economic conditions occur or a decline in comparable company market multiples, then key judgments and assumptions could be impacted. In the goodwill assessment process, the Company compares the carrying value of a reporting unit, including goodwill, to the fair value of the reporting unit to identify potential goodwill impairments. The Company estimates the fair value of the reporting unit by using both a discounted cash flow and comparable company market valuation approach. If an impairment is indicated in the assessment, the impairment would be measured as the amount by which the reporting unit's carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying value of goodwill. (See Note 6). Identifiable intangible assets with finite lives are generally amortized on a straight-line basis over their respective lives, which range from 10 to 20 years (See Note 6). Customer Claims and Product Warranties The Company generally provides product warranties related to manufacturing defects and specific performance standards for its products. At the time sales are recorded, the Company records reserves for the estimated costs of defective products and failure of its products to meet applicable performance standards. The level of reserves the Company establishes is based primarily upon historical experience, including the level of sales and evaluation of pending claims. Self-Insured Benefit Programs The Company records liabilities to reflect an estimate of the ultimate cost of claims related to its self-insured medical and dental benefits and workers' compensation. The amounts of such liabilities are based on an analysis of the Company's historical experience for each type of claim. 40 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (amounts in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) Income Taxes The Company recognizes deferred income tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences of the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. The Company evaluates the recoverability of these future tax benefits by assessing the adequacy of future expected taxable income from all sources. In the event that the Company is not able to realize all or a portion of the deferred tax assets in the future, a valuation allowance is provided. The Company recognizes such amounts through a charge to income in the period in which that determination is made or when tax law changes are enacted. The Company accounts for uncertainty in income tax positions according to FASB guidance relating to uncertain tax positions. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions, if any, in income tax expense. Derivative Financial Instruments The Company does not hold speculative financial instruments, nor does it hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes. The Company uses derivative instruments, currently interest rate swaps, to minimize the effects of interest rate volatility. The Company recognizes all derivatives at fair value. Derivatives that are designated as cash flow hedges are linked to specific liabilities on the Company's balance sheet. The Company assesses, both at inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of the hedged items. When it is determined that a derivative is not highly effective or the derivative expires, is sold, terminated, or exercised, the Company discontinues hedge accounting for that specific hedge instrument. Changes in the fair value of effective cash flow hedges are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ("AOCIL") and reclassified to earnings in the same periods during which the hedge transaction affects earnings. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are not effective cash flow hedges are recognized in results of operations. Treasury Stock The Company classifies treasury stock as a reduction to Common Stock for the par value of such shares acquired and the difference between the par value and the price paid for each share recorded either entirely to retained earnings or to additional paid-in-capital for periods in which the Company does not have retained earnings. This presentation reflects the repurchased shares as authorized but unissued as prescribed by state statute. Revenue Recognition Revenues, including shipping and handling amounts, are recognized when the following criteria are met: there is persuasive evidence that a sales agreement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. Delivery is not considered to have occurred until the customer takes title to the goods and assumes the risks and rewards of ownership, which is generally on the date of shipment. At the time revenue is recognized, the Company records a provision for the estimated amount of future returns including product warranties and customer claims based primarily on historical experience and any known trends or conditions that exist at the time revenue is recognized. Revenues are recorded net of taxes collected from customers. Advertising Costs and Vendor Consideration The Company engages in promotional and advertising programs that include rebates, discounts, points and cooperative advertising programs. Expenses relating to these programs are charged to results of operations during the period of the related benefits. These arrangements do not require significant estimates of costs. Substantially all such expenses are recorded as a deduction from sales. The cost of cooperative advertising programs is recorded as selling and administrative expenses when the Company can identify a tangible benefit associated with the program, and can reasonably estimate that the fair value of the benefit is equal to or greater than its cost. The amount of advertising and promotion expenses included in selling and administrative expenses was not significant for the years 2017, 2016, or 2015. Cost of Sales Cost of sales includes all costs related to manufacturing the Company's products, including purchasing and receiving costs, inspection costs, warehousing costs, freight costs, internal transfer costs or other costs of the Company's distribution network. Selling and Administrative Expenses Selling and administrative expenses include all costs, not included in cost of sales, related to the sale and marketing of the Company's products and general administration of the Company's business. 41 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (amounts in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) Operating Leases Rent is expensed over the lease period, including the effect of any rent holiday and rent escalation provisions, which effectively amortizes the rent holidays and rent escalations on a straight-line basis over the lease period. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of their economic lives or the lease term, excluding renewal options. Any leasehold improvement made by the Company and funded by the lessor is treated as a leasehold improvement and amortized over the shorter of its economic life or the lease term. Any funding provided by the lessor for such improvements is treated as deferred costs and amortized over the lease period. Stock-Based Compensation The Company recognizes compensation expense relating to stock-based payments based on the fair value of the equity or liability instrument issued. Restricted stock grants with pro-rata vesting are expensed using the straight-line method. (Terms of the Company's awards are specified in Note 15). The Company accounts for forfeitures when they actually occur. NOTE 2 - RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS Accounting Standards Adopted in Fiscal 2017 In July 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2015-11, "Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory." Topic 330 currently requires an entity to measure inventory at the lower of cost or market. Market could be replacement cost, net realizable value, or net realizable value less an approximately normal profit margin. This ASU does not apply to inventory that is measured using the LIFO or the retail inventory method. This ASU was effective for the Company's fiscal year beginning January 1, 2017. The Company measures substantially all inventories using the LIFO method; therefore, the adoption of this ASU did not have an impact on its financial statements. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, "Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting," which is intended to simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. This ASU was effective for the Company's fiscal year beginning January 1, 2017. The adoption of this ASU did not have a significant impact on the financial statements. The Company applied the ASU prospectively for the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The Company made an accounting policy election to account for forfeitures when they actually occur. In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business,” which narrows the existing definition of a business and provides a framework for evaluating whether a transaction should be accounted for as an acquisition (or disposal) of assets or a business. The definition of a business affects areas of accounting such as acquisitions, disposals and goodwill. Under this ASU, fewer acquired sets are expected to be considered businesses. For public entities, ASU 2017-01 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years with early adoption permitted under certain circumstances. The Company has elected to early adopt this ASU beginning with its fiscal year beginning January 1, 2017. The adoption of this ASU did not have any impact on the financial statements. In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.” Under the new standard, goodwill impairment would be measured as the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying value of goodwill. This ASU eliminates existing guidance that requires an entity to determine goodwill impairment by calculating the implied fair value of goodwill by hypothetically assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if that reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. For public entities, ASU 2017-04 is effective for annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The Company has elected to early adopt this ASU beginning with its fiscal year beginning January 1, 2017. The adoption of this ASU did not have any impact on the financial statements. On December 22, 2017, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 ("SAB 118") to address the application of U.S. GAAP related to the enactment of the Tax Cut and Jobs Act of 2017. This guidance was adopted in the fourth quarter of 2017. Additional information regarding this guidance is contained in Note 13. In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-02, “Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.” This ASU was released in response to a financial reporting issue that arose as a consequence of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted by the federal government on December 22, 2017. Previous U.S. GAAP required deferred tax liabilities and assets to be adjusted for the effect of a change in tax laws or rates with the effect being included in income from continuing operations in the reporting period that included the enactment date, even in situations where the related income tax effects of items in accumulated other comprehensive income were originally recognized in other comprehensive income rather than in income from continuing operations. By not also being able to adjust items 42 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (amounts in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) within accumulated other comprehensive income for the reduction of the historical corporate income tax rate, companies would have items in accumulated other comprehensive income that do not reflect the appropriate tax rate, referred to as a stranded tax effect. The amendments in this ASU allow the reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for any stranded tax effects that are a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. ASU 2018-02 is effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and for interim periods within those fiscal years with early adoption permitted for financial statements that have not yet been issued or have not yet been made available for issuance. The Company has elected to early adopt this ASU beginning with its fiscal year ending December 30, 2017. This will allow the Company to align the timing of the reclassification of the stranded tax effects with the effect of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The total amount reclassed from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings was $211. The Company's policy is to release tax effects remaining in accumulated other comprehensive income as individual units of account are sold, terminated or extinguished. Accounting Standards Yet to Be Adopted In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)". The ASU requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The ASU and all subsequently issued clarifying ASUs will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. The ASU also requires expanded disclosures relating to the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. Additionally, qualitative and quantitative disclosures are required for customer contracts, significant judgments and changes in judgments. The Company has completed the process of evaluating the effect of the adoption and determined there will be no changes required to its reported revenues as a result of the adoption. The majority of the Company's revenue arrangements generally consist of a single performance obligation to transfer promised goods or services. Based on the Company's evaluation process and review of its contracts with customers, the timing (point in time) and amount of revenue recognized previously is consistent with the how revenue will be recognized. The Company will adopt this new standard effective January 2018, using the retrospective method approach and will expand our financial statement disclosures in order to comply with the ASU. The Company has determined that the adoption of this ASU is not anticipated to have a significant impact on its financial statements. In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, "Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities," which addresses the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial assets and liabilities. The ASU primarily affects the accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the fair value option and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. In addition, the ASU clarifies the valuation allowance assessment when recognizing deferred tax assets resulting from unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities. The ASU is effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not believe the adoption of this ASU will have a significant impact on its financial statements. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842)," which requires lessees to recognize on the balance sheet a right-of use asset, representing the right to use the underlying asset for the lease term, and a lease liability for all leases with terms greater than 12 months. The guidance also requires qualitative and quantitative disclosures designed to assess the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. The standard requires the use of a modified retrospective transition approach, which includes a number of optional practical expedients that entities may elect to apply. ASU 2016-02 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted. The Company is continuing to evaluate the impact of the adoption of this ASU on its financial statements. The Company has developed a project team relative to the process of adopting this ASU and is currently completing a detailed review of the Company’s leasing arrangements, which consist primarily of building and equipment leases, to determine the impact. In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, "Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments," which amends the impairment model to utilize an expected loss methodology in place of the current incurred loss methodology, which will result in the more timely recognition of losses. For public entities, ASU 2016-13 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application will be permitted for all organizations for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company does not believe the adoption of this ASU will have a significant impact on its financial statements due to the nature of the Company's customers and the limited amount of write-offs in past years. In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments," which provides clarification guidance on certain cash flow presentation issues that have developed due to diversity in practice. These issues include certain cash receipts and payments for debt prepayment or extinguishment costs, the maturing of a zero coupon bond, the settlement of contingent liabilities arising from a business combination, proceeds from insurance settlements, distributions from certain equity method investees and beneficial interests obtained in a financial asset securitization. ASU 2016-15 clarifies that when cash receipts and cash payments have aspects of more than one class of cash flows and cannot be separated, classification will depend on the predominant source or use. For public entities, ASU 2016-15 is effective for annual 43 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (amounts in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not believe the adoption of this ASU will have a significant impact on its financial statements. In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash,” which clarifies guidance on the classification and presentation of restricted cash in the statement of cash flows. Under the ASU, changes in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents would be included along with those of cash and cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. In addition, a reconciliation between the balance sheet and the statement of cash flows would be disclosed when the balance sheet includes more than one line item for cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents. For public entities, ASU 2016-18 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years with early adoption permitted. Entities are required to apply the standard’s provisions on a retrospective basis. Since the Company has no restricted cash, it does not believe the adoption of this ASU will have a significant impact on its financial statements. In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-05, "Other Income-Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20): Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets." This ASU clarifies the scope and application of ASC 610-20 on the sale or transfer of nonfinancial assets and in substance nonfinancial assets to noncustomers, including partial sales. The amendments are effective at the same time as the new revenue standard. For public entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently assessing if there will be any impact on its financial statements. In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, "Compensation - Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost," which will change the presentation of net periodic benefit cost related to employer sponsored defined benefit plans and other postretirement benefits. Service cost will be included within the same income statement line item as other compensation costs arising from services rendered during the period, while other components of net periodic benefit pension cost will be presented separately outside of operating income. Additionally, only service costs may be capitalized in assets. ASU 2017-07 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not believe the adoption of this ASU will have a significant impact on its financial statements. In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, "Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting." This ASU provides amendments to the current guidance on determining which changes to the terms and conditions of share-based payment awards require the application of modification accounting. The effects of a modification should be accounted for unless there are no changes between the fair value, vesting conditions, and classification of the modified award and the original award immediately before the original award is modified. ASU 2017-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not believe the adoption of this ASU will have a significant impact on its financial statements. In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, "Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities." The amendments in this ASU update current guidance by more closely aligning the results of cash flow and fair value hedge accounting with risk management activities through changes to both the designation and measurement guidance for qualifying hedging relationships and the presentation of hedge results. ASU 2017-12 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not believe the adoption of this ASU will have a significant impact on its financial statements. NOTE 3 - RECEIVABLES, NET Receivables are summarized as follows: Customers, trade Other receivables Gross receivables Less: allowance for doubtful accounts Receivables, net Bad debt expense was $70 in 2017, $38 in 2016, and $146 in 2015. 44 2017 2016 $ $ 43,683 $ 2,930 46,613 (133) 46,480 $ 39,749 3,963 43,712 (107) 43,605 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (amounts in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) NOTE 4 - INVENTORIES, NET Inventories are summarized as follows: Raw materials Work-in-process Finished goods Supplies and other LIFO reserve Inventories, net NOTE 5 - PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET Property, plant and equipment consists of the following: Land and improvements Buildings and improvements Machinery and equipment Assets under construction Accumulated depreciation Property, plant and equipment, net 2017 2016 $ 39,264 $ 24,454 65,172 143 (15,376) $ 113,657 $ 34,261 16,739 57,053 120 (10,936) 97,237 2017 2016 $ 7,886 $ 62,852 188,971 2,443 262,152 (168,367) 7,781 62,055 177,745 2,386 249,967 (157,160) $ 93,785 $ 92,807 Depreciation of property, plant and equipment, including amounts for capital leases, totaled $12,436 in 2017, $12,944 in 2016 and $13,525 in 2015. NOTE 6 - GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS The carrying amount of goodwill is $3,389 as of December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. The Company performed its annual assessment of goodwill in the fourth quarters of 2017, 2016, and 2015 and no impairment was indicated. The following table represents the details of the Company's intangible assets subject to amortization: 2017 Accumulated Amortization $ (80) $ (72) (1,039) Gross 208 144 3,300 2016 Accumulated Amortization $ (64) $ (57) (764) 208 144 3,300 Net Gross 128 72 2,261 2,461 $ $ Net 144 87 2,536 2,767 $ 3,652 $ (1,191) $ 3,652 $ (885) $ Customer relationships $ Rug design coding Trade names Total Amortization expense for intangible assets is summarized as follows: Customer relationships Rug design coding Trade names Amortization expense 2017 2016 2015 $ $ 16 15 275 306 $ $ 16 14 275 305 $ $ 16 14 275 305 45 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (amounts in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) The estimated future amortization expense during each of the next five fiscal years is as follows: Year 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 NOTE 7 - ACCRUED EXPENSES Accrued expenses are summarized as follows: Compensation and benefits (1) Provision for customer rebates, claims and allowances Advanced customer deposits Outstanding checks in excess of cash Other Accrued expenses Amount $ 305 305 305 305 305 2017 2016 $ 9,276 $ 8,751 5,717 379 6,168 7,492 8,882 8,212 2,074 6,166 $ 30,291 $ 32,826 (1) Includes a liability related to the Company's self-insured Workers' Compensation program. This program is collateralized by letters of credit in the aggregate amount of $2,171. NOTE 8 - PRODUCT WARRANTY RESERVES The Company generally provides product warranties related to manufacturing defects and specific performance standards for its products. Product warranty reserves are included in accrued expenses in the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. The following is a summary of the Company's product warranty activity. Product warranty reserve at beginning of period Warranty liabilities accrued Warranty liabilities settled Changes for pre-existing warranty liabilities Product warranty reserve at end of period 2017 2016 $ $ 2,307 $ 6,049 (6,160) (321) 1,875 $ 2,159 6,406 (6,687) 429 2,307 46 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (amounts in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) NOTE 9 - LONG-TERM DEBT AND CREDIT ARRANGEMENTS Long-term debt consists of the following: Revolving credit facility Notes payable - buildings Acquisition note payable - Development Authority of Gordon County Acquisition note payable - Robertex Notes payable - equipment and other Capital lease obligations Deferred financing costs, net Total long-term debt Less: current portion of long-term debt Long-term debt Revolving Credit Facility 2017 2016 $ 97,708 $ 12,419 — 791 8,474 14,530 (665) 133,257 9,811 $ 123,446 $ 70,583 13,150 1,147 1,564 11,633 11,145 (844) 108,378 10,122 98,256 The revolving credit facility provides for a maximum of $150,000 of revolving credit, subject to borrowing base availability. The borrowing base is currently equal to specified percentages of the Company's eligible accounts receivable, inventories, fixed assets and real property less reserves established, from time to time, by the administrative agent under the facility. The revolving credit facility matures on September 23, 2021. The revolving credit facility is secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of the Company's assets. At the Company's election, advances of the revolving credit facility bear interest at annual rates equal to either (a) LIBOR for 1, 2 or 3 month periods, as selected by the Company, plus an applicable margin ranging between 1.50% and 2.00%, or (b) the higher of the prime rate, the Federal Funds rate plus 0.5%, or a daily LIBOR rate plus 1.00%, plus an applicable margin ranging between 0.50% and 1.00%. The applicable margin is determined based on availability under the revolving credit facility with margins increasing as availability decreases. As of December 30, 2017, the applicable margin on our revolving credit facility was 1.75%. The Company pays an unused line fee on the average amount by which the aggregate commitments exceed utilization of the revolving credit facility equal to 0.375% per annum. The weighted-average interest rate on borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility was 4.12% at December 30, 2017 and 4.40% at December 31, 2016. The revolving credit facility includes certain affirmative and negative covenants that impose restrictions on the Company's financial and business operations. The revolving credit facility restricts the Company's borrowing availability if its fixed charge coverage ratio is less than 1.1 to 1.0. During any period that the fixed charge coverage ratio is less than 1.1 to 1.0, the Company's borrowing availability is reduced by $16,500. As of December 30, 2017, the unused borrowing availability under the revolving credit facility was $32,928; however, since the Company's fixed charge coverage ratio was less than 1.1 to 1.0, the unused availability accessible by the Company was $16,428 (the amount above $16,500) at December 30, 2017. Notes Payable - Buildings On November 7, 2014, the Company entered into a ten-year $8,330 note payable to purchase a previously leased distribution center in Adairsville, Georgia. The note payable is scheduled to mature on November 7, 2024 and is secured by the distribution center. The note payable bears interest at a variable rate equal to one-month LIBOR plus 2.0% and is payable in equal monthly installments of principal of $35, plus interest calculated on the declining balance of the note, with a final payment of $4,165 due on maturity. In addition, the Company entered into an interest rate swap with an amortizing notional amount effective November 7, 2014 which effectively fixes the interest rate at 4.50%. On January 23, 2015, the Company entered into a ten-year $6,290 note payable to finance an owned facility in Saraland, Alabama. The note payable is scheduled to mature on January 7, 2025 and is secured by the facility. The note payable bears interest at a variable rate equal to one-month LIBOR plus 2.0% and is payable in equal monthly installments of principal of $26, plus interest calculated on the declining balance of the note, with a final payment of $3,145 due on maturity. In addition, the Company entered into a forward interest rate swap with an amortizing notional amount effective January 7, 2017 which effectively fixes the interest rate at 4.30%. 47 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (amounts in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) Acquisition Note Payable - Development Authority of Gordon County On November 2, 2012, the Company signed a 6.00% seller-financed note of $5,500 with Lineage PCR, Inc. (“Lineage”) related to the acquisition of the continuous carpet dyeing facility in Calhoun, Georgia. Effective December 28, 2012, through a series of agreements between the Company, the Development Authority of Gordon County, Georgia (the “Authority”) and Lineage, obligations with identical payment terms as the original note to Lineage were now payment obligations to the Authority. These transactions were consummated in order to provide a tax abatement to the Company related to the real estate and equipment at this facility. The tax abatement plan provided for abatement for certain components of the real and personal property taxes for up to ten years. At any time, the Company had the option to pay off the obligation, plus a nominal amount. The debt to the Authority bore interest at 6.00% and was payable in equal monthly installments of principal and interest of $106 over 57 months. The note matured on November 2, 2017 and the final installment was paid at that time. Acquisition Note Payable - Robertex On July 1, 2013, the Company signed a 4.50% seller-financed note of $4,000, which was recorded at a fair value of $3,749, with Robert P. Rothman related to the acquisition of Robertex Associates, LLC ("Robertex") in Calhoun, Georgia. The note is payable in five annual installments of principal of $800 plus interest. The note matures June 30, 2018. Notes Payable - Equipment and Other The Company's equipment financing notes have terms ranging from 1 to 7 years, bear interest ranging from 1.00% to 7.68% and are due in monthly installments through their maturity dates. The Company's equipment financing notes are secured by the specific equipment financed and do not contain any financial covenants. Capital Lease Obligations The Company's capitalized lease obligations have terms ranging from 3 to 7 years, bear interest ranging from 3.55% to 7.37% and are due in monthly or quarterly installments through their maturity dates. The Company's capital lease obligations are secured by the specific equipment leased. Interest Payments and Debt Maturities Interest payments for continuing operations were $5,373 in 2017, $5,088 in 2016, and $4,449 in 2015. Maturities of long-term debt for periods following December 30, 2017 are as follows: 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Thereafter Total maturities of long-term debt Deferred financing costs, net Total long-term debt NOTE 10 - FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS Long-Term Debt Capital Leases (See Note 17) Total $ $ $ 5,527 $ 4,284 $ 2,782 1,873 99,446 1,001 8,763 3,382 3,180 2,534 913 237 9,811 6,164 5,053 101,980 1,914 9,000 119,392 $ 14,530 $ 133,922 (665) — (665) 118,727 $ 14,530 $ 133,257 Fair value is defined as the exchange value of an asset or a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. The fair value guidance outlines a valuation framework and establishes a fair value hierarchy in order to increase the consistency and comparability of fair value measurements and disclosures. The hierarchy consists of three levels as follows: Level 1 - Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reported date; Level 2 - Other than quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities, quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, and other than quoted prices for assets or liabilities and prices that are derived principally from or corroborated by market data by correlation or other means; and 48 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (amounts in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) Level 3 - Measurements using management's best estimate of fair value, where the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation. The following table reflects the fair values of assets and liabilities measured and recognized at fair value on a recurring basis on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016: Liabilities: Interest rate swaps (1) Contingent consideration (2) 2017 2016 Fair Value Hierarchy Level $ 2,229 $ 25 3,695 200 Level 2 Level 3 (1) The Company uses certain external sources in deriving the fair value of the interest rate swaps. The interest rate swaps were valued using observable inputs (e.g., LIBOR yield curves, credit spreads). Valuations of interest rate swaps may fluctuate considerably from period-to-period due to volatility in underlying interest rates, which are driven by market conditions and the duration of the instrument. Credit adjustments could have a significant impact on the valuations due to changes in credit ratings of the Company or its counterparties. (2) As a result of the Robertex acquisition in 2013, the Company recorded a contingent consideration liability at fair value. This fair value measurement was based on calculations that utilize significant inputs not observable in the market including forecasted revenues, gross margins and discount rates and thus represent Level 3 measurements. This fair value measurement is directly impacted by the Company's estimates. Accordingly, if the estimates within the fair value measurement are higher or lower, the Company would record additional charges or benefits, respectively, as appropriate. Changes in the fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the years ending December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were as follows: Beginning balance Fair value adjustments Settlements Ending balance 2017 2016 $ $ 200 $ (163) (12) 25 $ 584 (230) (154) 200 There were no transfers of assets or liabilities between Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 during 2017 or 2016. If any, the Company recognizes the transfers in or transfers out at the end of the reporting period. The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company's financial instruments are summarized as follows: Financial assets: Cash and cash equivalents Notes receivable, including current portion Financial liabilities: 2017 2016 Carrying Amount Fair Value Carrying Amount Fair Value $ 19 $ 282 19 $ 282 $ 140 282 140 282 Long-term debt and capital leases, including current portion Interest rate swaps 133,257 2,229 131,203 2,229 108,378 3,695 105,270 3,695 The fair values of the Company's long-term debt and capital leases were estimated using market rates the Company believes would be available for similar types of financial instruments and represent level 2 measurements. The fair values of cash and cash equivalents and notes receivable approximate their carrying amounts due to the short-term nature of the financial instruments. NOTE 11 - DERIVATIVES The Company's earnings, cash flows and financial position are exposed to market risks relating to interest rates. It is the Company's policy to minimize its exposure to adverse changes in interest rates and manage interest rate risks inherent in funding the Company with debt. The Company addresses this risk by maintaining a mix of fixed and floating rate debt and entering into interest rate swaps for a portion of its variable rate debt to minimize interest rate volatility. 49 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (amounts in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) The following is a summary of the Company's interest rate swaps as of December 30, 2017: Type Interest rate swap Interest rate swap Interest rate swap Interest rate swap $ $ $ $ Notional Amount 25,000 25,000 Effective Date September 1, 2016 through September 1, 2021 Fixed Rate 3.105% Variable Rate 1 Month LIBOR September 1, 2015 through September 1, 2021 3.304% 1 Month LIBOR 7,046 (1) November 7, 2014 through November 7, 2024 4.500% 1 Month LIBOR 5,373 (2) January 7, 2017 through January 7, 2025 4.300% 1 Month LIBOR (1) Interest rate swap notional amount amortizes by $35 monthly to maturity. (2) Interest rate swap notional amount amortizes by $26 monthly to maturity. The following table summarizes the fair values of derivative instruments included in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets: Liability Derivatives: Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: Interest rate swaps, current portion Interest rate swaps, long-term portion Total Liability Derivatives Location on Consolidated Balance Sheets Fair Value 2017 2016 Accrued Expenses Other Long-Term Liabilities $ $ 842 1,387 2,229 $ $ 1,342 2,353 3,695 The following tables summarize the pre-tax impact of derivative instruments on the Company's financial statements: Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: Cash flow hedges - interest rate swaps $ 180 $ (263) $ (2,410) Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in AOCIL on the effective portion of the Derivative 2017 2016 2015 Amount of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from AOCIL on the effective portion into Income (1)(2) 2017 2016 2015 Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: Cash flow hedges - interest rate swaps $ (1,250) $ (1,291) $ (777) (1) The amount of gain (loss) reclassified from AOCIL is included in interest expense on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations. (2) The amount of loss expected to be reclassified from AOCIL into earnings during the next 12 months subsequent to fiscal 2017 is $842. The amount of gain (loss) recognized in income on the ineffective portion of interest rate swaps, if any, is included in other (income) expense, net on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations. There was no ineffective portion for the periods presented. NOTE 12 - EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS Defined Contribution Plans The Company sponsors a 401(k) defined contribution plan that covers a significant portion, or approximately 86% of the Company's associates. This plan includes a mandatory Company match on the first 1% of participants' contributions. The Company matches the next 2% of participants' contributions if the Company meets prescribed earnings levels. The plan also provides for additional Company contributions above the 3% level if the Company attains certain additional performance targets. Matching contribution expense for this 401(k) plan was $484 in 2017, $425 in 2016 and $454 in 2015. Additionally, the Company sponsors a 401(k) defined contribution plan that covers those associates at one facility who are under a collective-bargaining agreement, or approximately 14% of the Company's associates. Under this plan, the Company generally matches participants' contributions, on a sliding scale, up to a maximum of 2.75% of the participant's earnings. Matching contribution expense for the collective-bargaining 401(k) plan was $125 in 2017, $71 in 2016 and $82 in 2015. 50 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (amounts in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) Non-Qualified Retirement Savings Plan The Company sponsors a non-qualified retirement savings plan that allows eligible associates to defer a specified percentage of their compensation. The obligations owed to participants under this plan were $17,010 at December 30, 2017 and $14,992 at December 31, 2016 and are included in other long-term liabilities in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. The obligations are unsecured general obligations of the Company and the participants have no right, interest or claim in the assets of the Company, except as unsecured general creditors. The Company utilizes a Rabbi Trust to hold, invest and reinvest deferrals and contributions under the plan. Amounts are invested in Company-owned life insurance in the Rabbi Trust and the cash surrender value of the policies was $18,232 at December 30, 2017 and $15,679 at December 31, 2016 and is included in other assets in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. Multi-Employer Pension Plan The Company contributes to a multi-employer pension plan under the terms of a collective-bargaining agreement that covers its union-represented employees. These union-represented employees represented approximately 14% of the Company's total employees. The risks of participating in multi-employer plans are different from single-employer plans. If a participating employer stops contributing to the plan, the unfunded obligations of the plan may be borne by the remaining participating employers. If the Company chooses to stop participating in the multi-employer plan, the Company may be required to pay the plan an amount based on the underfunded status of the plan, referred to as a withdrawal liability. The Company's participation in the multi-employer pension plan for 2017 is provided in the table below. The "EIN/Pension Plan Number" column provides the Employee Identification Number (EIN) and the three digit plan number. The most recent Pension Protection Act (PPA) zone status available in 2017 and 2016 is for the plan's year-end at 2016 and 2015, respectively. The zone status is based on information that the Company received from the plan and is certified by the plan's actuary. Among other factors, plans in the red zone are generally less than 65% funded, plans in the yellow zone are less than 80% funded and plans in the green zone are at least 80% funded. The "FIP/RP Status Pending/Implemented" column indicates a plan for which a financial improvement plan (FIP) or a rehabilitation plan (RP) is either pending or has been implemented. The last column lists the expiration date of the collective-bargaining agreement to which the plan is subject. Pension Fund EIN/Pension Plan Number Pension Protection Act Zone Status 2017 2016 FIP/RP Status Pending/ Implemented (1) Contributions (2) 2017 2016 2015 Surcharge Imposed (1) Expiration Date of Collective- Bargaining Agreement The Pension Plan of the National Retirement Fund 13-6130178 - 001 Red Red Implemented $ 313 $ 274 $ 268 Yes 6/3/2018 (1) The collective-bargaining agreement requires the Company to contribute to the plan at the rate of $0.47 per compensated hour for each covered employee. The Company will make additional contributions, as mandated by law, in accordance with the fund's 2010 Rehabilitation Plan which required a surcharge equal to $0.03 per hour (from $0.47 to $0.50) effective June 1, 2014 to May 31, 2015, a surcharge equal to $0.03 per hour (from $0.50 to $0.53) effective June 1, 2015 to May 31, 2016, a surcharge equal to $0.02 per hour (from $0.53 to $0.55) effective June 1, 2016 to May 31, 2017, and a surcharge equal to $0.03 per hour (from $0.55 to $0.58) effective June 1, 2017 to May 31, 2018, respectively. Based upon current employment and benefit levels, the Company's contributions to the multi-employer pension plan are expected to be approximately $328 for 2018. (2) The Company's contributions to the plan do not represent more than 5% of the total contributions to the plan for the most recent plan year available. Postretirement Plans The Company sponsors a postretirement benefit plan that provides life insurance to a limited number of associates upon retirement as part of a collective bargaining agreement. 51 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (amounts in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) Information about the benefit obligation and funded status of the Company's postretirement benefit plan is summarized as follows: Change in benefit obligation: Benefit obligation at beginning of year Service cost Interest cost Actuarial (gain) loss Benefits paid Benefit obligation at end of year Change in plan assets: Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year Employer contributions Benefits paid Fair value of plan assets at end of year 2017 2016 $ 314 $ 7 16 (11) (1) 325 — 1 (1) — 290 7 15 3 (1) 314 — 1 (1) — Unfunded amount $ (325) $ (314) The balance sheet classification of the Company's liability for the postretirement benefit plan is summarized as follows: Accrued expenses Other long-term liabilities Total liability 2017 2016 $ $ 14 $ 311 325 $ 13 301 314 Benefits expected to be paid on behalf of associates for the postretirement benefit plan during the period 2018 through 2027 are summarized as follows: Years 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 - 2027 Postretirement Plan $ 14 14 13 13 14 72 Assumptions used to determine the benefit obligation of the Company's postretirement benefit plan are summarized as follows: Weighted-average assumptions as of year-end: Discount rate (benefit obligation) 2017 2016 4.00% 4.00% 52 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (amounts in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) Components of net periodic benefit cost (credit) for the postretirement plan are summarized as follows: Service cost Interest cost Amortization of prior service credits Recognized net actuarial gains Net periodic benefit cost (credit) 2017 2016 2015 $ $ $ 7 16 (4) (30) $ 7 15 (4) (33) (11) $ (15) $ 7 18 (86) (40) (101) Pre-tax amounts included in AOCIL for the Company's postretirement benefit plan at 2017 are summarized as follows: Prior service credits Unrecognized actuarial gains Totals NOTE 13 - INCOME TAXES Postretirement Benefit Plan Balance at 2017 2018 Expected Amortization $ $ (8) $ (381) (389) $ (4) (30) (34) The provision (benefit) for income taxes on income (loss) from continuing operations consists of the following: 2017 2016 2015 Current Federal State Total current Deferred Federal State Total deferred $ 278 $ (950) (672) 7,535 646 8,181 (396) $ 34 (362) (3,003) (257) (3,260) Income tax provision (benefit) $ 7,509 $ (3,622) $ 277 (261) 16 (641) (89) (730) (714) 53 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (amounts in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) Differences between the provision (benefit) for income taxes and the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes are summarized as follows: Federal statutory rate Statutory rate applied to income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes $ Plus state income taxes, net of federal tax effect Total statutory provision (benefit) Effect of differences: Nondeductible meals and entertainment Federal tax credits Reserve for uncertain tax positions Goodwill Change in valuation allowance Tax reform Stock-based compensation Other items Income tax provision (benefit) 2017 2016 2015 35% 35% 35% (635) (198) (833) 161 (200) 8 — 6,470 1,749 146 8 $ (3,090) $ (145) (3,235) 148 (395) 31 (13) 106 — — (264) $ 7,509 $ (3,622) $ (1,047) (227) (1,274) 147 (441) 35 (124) 977 — — (34) (714) On December 22, 2017, the President signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”). The Tax Act, among other things, lowered the U.S. corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018. Consequently, the Company wrote down its net deferred tax assets as of December 30, 2017 by $8,169 to reflect the estimated impact of the Tax Act. This amount included a charge of $1,749 related to the re-measurement of certain net deferred tax assets using the lower U.S. corporate income tax rate and a charge of $6,420 to increase the valuation allowance related to the net deferred tax asset. The majority of the increase in the valuation allowance is related to the revised treatment of net operating losses under the Tax Act. While the Company has substantially completed its provisional analysis of the income tax effects of the Tax Act and recorded a reasonable estimate of such effects, the charge related to the Tax Act may differ, possibly materially, due to, among other things, further refinement of its calculations, changes in interpretations and assumptions that the Company has made or additional guidance that may be issued related to the Tax Act. The Company will complete its analysis over a one-year measurement period from the enactment date, and any adjustments during this measurement period will be included in income from continuing operations as an adjustment to income tax expense in the reporting period when such adjustments are determined. In 2016, the Company increased valuation allowances by $106 related to state income tax loss carryforwards and state income tax credit carryforwards to reflect the estimated amount of deferred tax assets that may not be realized during the carryforward periods. In 2015, the Company increased valuation allowances by $977 related to state income tax loss carryforwards and state income tax credit carryforwards to reflect the estimated amount of deferred tax assets that may not be realized during the carryforward periods. Income tax payments, net of (income tax refunds) received for continuing and discontinued operations were $44 in 2017, $(190) in 2016 and $48 in 2015. 54 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (amounts in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Significant components of the Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows: (amounts in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) Deferred tax assets: Significant components of the Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows: $ Inventories Retirement benefits Deferred tax assets: State net operating losses Inventories Federal net operating losses Retirement benefits State tax credit carryforwards State net operating losses Federal tax credit carryforwards Federal net operating losses Allowances for bad debts, claims and discounts State tax credit carryforwards Other Total deferred tax assets Federal tax credit carryforwards Allowances for bad debts, claims and discounts Valuation allowance Net deferred tax assets Other Total deferred tax assets Valuation allowance Deferred tax liabilities: Net deferred tax assets Property, plant and equipment Total deferred tax liabilities Deferred tax liabilities: Property, plant and equipment Net deferred tax asset (liability) Total deferred tax liabilities 2017 2016 3,146 $ 4,057 2017 2,200 2016 3,387 $ $ 4,196 3,146 3,204 $ 2,200 1,963 4,196 3,365 3,204 2,373 1,963 3,649 3,365 24,096 2,373 (12,994) 3,649 11,102 24,096 (12,994) 11,102 12,207 12,207 12,207 (1,105) $ 12,207 3,672 4,057 5,930 3,387 1,728 3,672 3,361 5,930 3,442 1,728 5,001 3,361 30,578 3,442 (5,400) 5,001 25,178 30,578 (5,400) 25,178 17,568 17,568 17,568 7,610 17,568 $ 7,610 (1,105) $ At December 30, 2017, $3,204 of deferred tax assets related to approximately $15,328 of federal net operating loss carryforwards and $4,196 of deferred tax assets related to approximately $78,399 of state net operating loss carryforwards. In addition, $3,365 Net deferred tax asset (liability) of federal tax credit carryforwards and $1,963 of state tax credit carryforwards were available to the Company. The federal net operating loss carryforwards and the federal tax credit carryforwards will expire between 2029 and 2036. The state net operating At December 30, 2017, $3,204 of deferred tax assets related to approximately $15,328 of federal net operating loss carryforwards loss carryforwards and the state tax credit carryforwards will expire between 2018 and 2037. A valuation allowance of $12,994 is and $4,196 of deferred tax assets related to approximately $78,399 of state net operating loss carryforwards. In addition, $3,365 recorded to reflect the estimated amount of deferred tax assets that may not be realized during the carryforward periods. At of federal tax credit carryforwards and $1,963 of state tax credit carryforwards were available to the Company. The federal net December 30, 2017, the Company is in a net deferred tax liability position of $1,105 which is included in other liabilities in the operating loss carryforwards and the federal tax credit carryforwards will expire between 2029 and 2036. The state net operating Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. The net deferred tax asset in 2016 was included in other assets in the Company's loss carryforwards and the state tax credit carryforwards will expire between 2018 and 2037. A valuation allowance of $12,994 is Consolidated Balance Sheets. recorded to reflect the estimated amount of deferred tax assets that may not be realized during the carryforward periods. At December 30, 2017, the Company is in a net deferred tax liability position of $1,105 which is included in other liabilities in the Tax Uncertainties Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. The net deferred tax asset in 2016 was included in other assets in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company accounts for uncertainty in income tax positions according to FASB guidance relating to uncertain tax positions. Unrecognized tax benefits were $414 and $406 at December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Such benefits, if Tax Uncertainties recognized, would affect the Company's effective tax rate. There were no significant interest or penalties accrued as of December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. The Company accounts for uncertainty in income tax positions according to FASB guidance relating to uncertain tax positions. Unrecognized tax benefits were $414 and $406 at December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Such benefits, if The following is a summary of the change in the Company's unrecognized tax benefits: recognized, would affect the Company's effective tax rate. There were no significant interest or penalties accrued as of December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. 2015 2016 2017 Balance at beginning of year 406 The following is a summary of the change in the Company's unrecognized tax benefits: Additions based on tax positions taken during a current period 8 $ $ Reductions related to settlement of tax matters 2017 — 2016 375 $ 31 — 400 35 2015 (60) Balance at beginning of year Balance at end of year $ $ 406 414 $ $ 375 406 $ $ 400 375 Additions based on tax positions taken during a current period The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to United States federal income taxes, as well as income taxes in a number of state (60) Reductions related to settlement of tax matters jurisdictions. The tax years subsequent to 2013 remain open to examination for federal income taxes. The majority of state Balance at end of year jurisdictions remain open for tax years subsequent to 2013. A few state jurisdictions remain open to examination for tax years subsequent to 2012. The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to United States federal income taxes, as well as income taxes in a number of state jurisdictions. The tax years subsequent to 2013 remain open to examination for federal income taxes. The majority of state jurisdictions remain open for tax years subsequent to 2013. A few state jurisdictions remain open to examination for tax years subsequent to 2012. 375 414 406 31 — — $ $ $ 8 35 55 55 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (amounts in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) NOTE 14 - COMMON STOCK AND EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE Common & Preferred Stock The Company's charter authorizes 80,000,000 shares of Common Stock with a $3 par value per share and 16,000,000 shares of Class B Common Stock with a $3 par value per share. Holders of Class B Common Stock have the right to twenty votes per share on matters that are submitted to Shareholders for approval and to dividends in an amount not greater than dividends declared and paid on Common Stock. Class B Common Stock is restricted as to transferability and may be converted into Common Stock on a one share for one share basis. The Company's charter also authorizes 200,000,000 shares of Class C Common Stock, $3 par value per share, and 16,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock. No shares of Class C Common Stock or Preferred Stock have been issued. Earnings (Loss) Per Share The Company's unvested stock awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents, whether paid or unpaid, are considered participating securities and are included in the computation of earnings per share. The accounting guidance requires additional disclosure of EPS for common stock and unvested share-based payment awards, separately disclosing distributed and undistributed earnings. Undistributed earnings represent earnings that were available for distribution but were not distributed. Common stock and unvested share-based payment awards earn dividends equally. All earnings were undistributed in all periods presented. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations: Basic earnings (loss) per share: Income (loss) from continuing operations Less: Allocation of earnings to participating securities Income (loss) from continuing operations available to common shareholders - basic Basic weighted-average shares outstanding (1) Basic earnings (loss) per share - continuing operations Diluted earnings (loss) per share: Income (loss) from continuing operations available to common shareholders - basic Add: Undistributed earnings reallocated to unvested shareholders Income (loss) from continuing operations available to common shareholders - basic Basic weighted-average shares outstanding (1) Effect of dilutive securities: Stock options (2) Directors' stock performance units (2) $ $ $ $ $ 2017 2016 2015 (9,322) $ (5,207) $ (2,278) — — — (9,322) $ (5,207) $ 15,699 15,638 (0.59) $ (0.33) $ (2,278) 15,536 (0.15) (9,322) $ (5,207) $ (2,278) — — — (9,322) $ (5,207) $ 15,699 15,638 — — — — (2,278) 15,536 — — 15,536 (0.15) Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding (1)(2) 15,699 15,638 Diluted earnings (loss) per share - continuing operations $ (0.59) $ (0.33) $ Includes Common and Class B Common shares, excluding 434 unvested participating securities, in thousands. (1) (2) Shares issuable under stock option plans where the exercise price is greater than the average market price of the Company's Common Stock during the relevant period and directors' stock performance units have been excluded to the extent they are anti-dilutive. Aggregate shares excluded were 448 in 2017, 220 in 2016 and 333 in 2015. NOTE 15 - STOCK PLANS AND STOCK COMPENSATION EXPENSE The Company recognizes compensation expense relating to share-based payments based on the fair value of the equity instrument issued and records such expense in selling and administrative expenses in the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. The number of shares to be issued is determined by dividing the specified dollar value of the award by the market value per share on the grant date. The Company's stock compensation expense was $940 in 2017, $1,324 in 2016 and $1,406 in 2015. 56 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (amounts in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan On May 3, 2016, the Company's shareholders' approved and adopted the Company's 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan (the "2016 Incentive Compensation Plan") which provides for the issuance of a maximum of 800,000 shares of Common Stock and/or Class B Common Stock for the grant of options, and/or other stock-based or stock-denominated awards to employees, officers, directors, and agents of the Company and its participating subsidiaries. The 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan and the allocation of shares thereunder superseded and replaced The Dixie Group, Inc. Stock Awards Plan, as amended (the "2006 Plan") and the allocation of shares thereunder. The 2006 Plan was terminated with respect to new awards. Awards previously granted under the 2006 Plan continue to be governed by the terms of that plan and are not affected by its termination. 2006 Stock Awards Plan The Company had a Stock Awards Plan, ("2006 Plan"), as amended, which provided for the issuance of up to 1,800,000 shares of Common Stock and/or Class B Common Stock as stock-based or stock-denominated awards to directors of the Company and to salaried employees of the Company and its participating subsidiaries. Restricted Stock Awards Each executive officer has the opportunity to earn a Primary Long-Term Incentive Award of restricted stock and separately receive an award of restricted stock denominated as “Career Shares.” The number of shares issued, if any, is based on the market price of the Company’s Common Stock at the time of grant of the award, subject to a $5.00 per share minimum value. Primary Long- Term Incentive Awards vest over three years. For participants over age 60, Career Share Awards fully vest when the participant becomes (i) qualified to retire from the Company and (ii) has retained such shares two years following the grant date. For the participants under age 60, Career Shares vest ratably over five years beginning on the participant's 61st birthday. On March 10, 2017, the Company granted 40,000 shares of restricted stock to certain key employees of the Company. The grant- date fair value of the awards was $140, or $3.50 per share, and will be recognized as stock compensation expense over a three- year vesting period from the date the awards were granted. Each award is subject to a continued service condition. The fair value of each share of restricted stock awarded was equal to the market value of a share of the Company's Common Stock on the grant date. On September 1, 2017, the Company granted 10,000 shares of restricted stock to a key employee. The grant-date fair value of the award was $42, or $4.15 per share, and will be recognized as stock compensation expense over a three-year vesting period from the date the award was granted. The award is subject to a continued service condition. The fair value of each share of restricted stock awarded was equal to the market value of a share of the Company's Common Stock on the grant date. On September 18, 2017, the Company granted 10,000 shares of restricted stock to a key employee. The grant-date fair value of the award was $41, or $4.05 per share, and will be recognized as stock compensation expense over a three-year vesting period from the date the award was granted. The award is subject to a continued service condition. The fair value of each share of restricted stock awarded was equal to the market value of a share of the Company's Common Stock on the grant date. On March 11, 2016, the Company issued 149,215 shares of restricted stock to officers and other key employees. The grant-date fair value of the awards was $651, or $4.360 per share, and is expected to be recognized as stock compensation expense over a weighted-average period of 8.7 years from the date the awards were granted. Each award is subject to a continued service condition. The fair value of each share of restricted stock awarded was equal to the market value of a share of the Company's Common Stock on the grant date. On March 12, 2015, the Company issued 114,625 shares of restricted stock to officers and other key employees. The grant-date fair value of the awards was $1,021, or $8.910 per share, and is expected to be recognized as stock compensation expense over a weighted-average period of 7.4 years from the date the awards were granted. Each award is subject to a continued service condition. The fair value of each share of restricted stock awarded was equal to the market value of a share of the Company's Common Stock on the grant date. On April 29, 2015, the Company granted 100,000 shares of restricted stock to the Company's Chief Executive Officer. The grant- date fair value of the award was $982, or $9.815 per share and will be recognized as stock compensation expense over a four year vesting period from the date the award was granted. Vesting of the award is subject to both a service condition and performance condition. The fair value of each share of restricted stock awarded was equal to the market value of a share of the Company's Common Stock on the grant date. On August 1, 2015, the Company granted 10,000 shares of restricted stock to an employee. The grant-date fair value of the award was $100, or $9.980 per share and will be recognized as stock compensation over a three year vesting period from the date the 57 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (amounts in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) award was granted. The award is subject to a continued service condition. The fair value of each share of restricted stock awarded was equal to the market value of a share of the Company's Common Stock on the grant date. Restricted stock activity for the three years ended December 30, 2017 is summarized as follows: Outstanding at December 27, 2014 Granted Vested Forfeited Outstanding at December 26, 2015 Granted Vested Forfeited Outstanding at December 31, 2016 Granted Vested Forfeited Outstanding at December 30, 2017 Number of Shares 357,239 $ 224,625 (155,991) (9,078) 416,795 149,215 (107,318) (1,314) 457,378 60,000 (78,908) (4,629) 433,841 $ Weighted- Average Grant- Date Fair Value 7.92 9.36 7.18 10.97 8.90 4.36 8.88 15.68 7.41 3.70 8.79 5.96 6.66 As of December 30, 2017, unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock was $1,368. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 7.3 years. The total fair value of shares vested was approximately $276, $456 and $1,410 during 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Stock Performance Units The Company's non-employee directors receive an annual retainer of $18 in cash and $18 in value of Stock Performance Units (subject to a $5.00 minimum per unit). If market value at the date of the grants is above $5.00 per share; there is no reduction in the number of units issued. However, if the market value at the date of the grants is below $5.00, units will be reduced to reflect the $5.00 per share minimum. Upon retirement, the Company issues the number of shares of Common Stock equivalent to the number of Stock Performance Units held by non-employee directors at that time. As of December 30, 2017, 141,432 Stock Performance Units were outstanding under this plan. As of December 30, 2017, unrecognized compensation cost related to Stock Performance Units was $34. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 0.3 years. Stock Options Options granted under the Company's 2006 Plan and the 2016 Plan were exercisable for periods determined at the time the awards are granted. Effective 2009, the Company established a $5.00 minimum exercise price on all options granted. On May 30, 2017, the Company granted 203,000 options with a market condition to certain key employees of the Company at a weighted-average exercise price of $4.30. The grant-date fair value of these options was $306. These options vest over a two- year period and require the Company's stock to trade at or above $7.00 for five consecutive trading days after the two-year period and within five years of issuance to meet the market condition. The fair value of each option was estimated on the date of grant using a lattice model. Expected volatility was based on historical volatility of the Company's stock, using the most recent period equal to the expected life of the options. The risk-free interest rate was based on the U.S. Treasury yield for a term equal to the expected life of the option at the time of grant. The Company uses historical exercise behavior data of similar employee groups to determine the expected life of options. 58 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (amounts in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) The following weighted-average assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of stock options granted during the year ended December 30, 2017: Expected Volatility Risk-free interest rate Dividend yield Expected life of options (yrs) 2017 2016 (1) 2015 (1) 47.80% 1.79% —% 5 —% —% —% 0 —% —% —% 0 (1) No options were granted during the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 26, 2015. Option activity for the three years ended December 30, 2017 is summarized as follows: Weighted- Average Exercise Price Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years) Weighted- Average Fair Value of Options Granted During the Year Number of Shares Outstanding at December 27, 2014 439,235 $ Exercised Forfeited Outstanding at December 26, 2015 Exercised Forfeited Outstanding at December 31, 2016 Granted Exercised Forfeited (89,435) (246,300) 103,500 — — 103,500 203,000 — — Outstanding at December 30, 2017 306,500 $ Options exercisable at: December 26, 2015 December 31, 2016 December 30, 2017 103,500 $ 103,500 103,500 10.31 6.78 13.82 5.00 — — 5.00 4.30 — — 4.54 5.00 5.00 5.00 $ 3.5 $ 1.8 — — — — — — — 1.51 — — — — — — At December 30, 2017, there was no intrinsic value of outstanding stock options and no intrinsic value of exercisable stock options. The intrinsic value of stock options exercised during 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $0, $0 and $221, respectively. At December 30, 2017, unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock options was $211 and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.4 years. 59 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (amounts in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) NOTE 16 - ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) Components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, are as follows: Balance at December 27, 2014 Unrealized loss on interest rate swaps, net of tax of $916 Reclassification of loss into earnings from interest rate swaps, net of tax of $295 Unrecognized net actuarial gain on postretirement benefit plans, net of tax of $18 Reclassification of net actuarial gain into earnings from postretirement benefit plans, net of tax of $15 Reclassification of prior service credits into earnings from postretirement benefit plans, net of tax of $33 Balance at December 26, 2015 Unrealized loss on interest rate swaps, net of tax of $100 Reclassification of loss into earnings from interest rate swaps, net of tax of $491 Unrecognized net actuarial loss on postretirement benefit plans, net of tax of $1 Reclassification of net actuarial gain into earnings from postretirement benefit plans, net of tax of $13 Reclassification of prior service credits into earnings from postretirement benefit plans, net of tax of $2 Balance at December 31, 2016 Unrealized gain on interest rate swaps, net of tax of $68 Reclassification of loss into earnings from interest rate swaps, net of tax of $475 Unrecognized net actuarial gain on postretirement benefit plans, net of tax of $4 Reclassification of net actuarial gain into earnings from postretirement benefit plans, net of tax of $11 Reclassification of prior service credits into earnings from postretirement benefit plans, net of tax of $1 Reclassification of stranded tax effects Balance at December 30, 2017 NOTE 17 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES Commitments Interest Rate Swaps Post- Retirement Liabilities (1,841) (1,494) 482 — — — (2,853) (163) 800 — — — (2,216) 112 775 — — — (258) 328 — — 30 (25) (53) 280 — — (2) (20) (2) 256 — — 7 (19) (3) 47 Total (1,513) (1,494) 482 30 (25) (53) (2,573) (163) 800 (2) (20) (2) (1,960) 112 775 7 (19) (3) (211) $ (1,587) $ 288 $ (1,299) The Company had purchase commitments of $697 at December 30, 2017, primarily related to machinery and equipment. The Company enters into fixed-price contracts with suppliers to purchase natural gas to support certain manufacturing processes. The Company had contract purchases of $640 in 2017, $855 in 2016 and $1,151 in 2015. At December 30, 2017, the Company has commitments to purchase natural gas of $428 for 2018. 60 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (amounts in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) The Company leases certain equipment under capital leases and certain buildings, machinery and equipment under operating leases. Commitments for minimum rentals under non-cancelable leases, including any applicable rent escalation clauses, are as follows: 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Thereafter Total commitments Less amounts representing interest Total Capital Leases Operating Leases $ 5,006 $ 3,898 3,506 2,684 956 244 16,294 (1,764) $ 14,530 $ 3,709 2,854 2,364 1,882 1,451 3,525 15,785 — 15,785 Rental expense was approximately $3,687, $3,575 and $3,593 during 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Property, plant and equipment includes machinery and equipment under capital leases which have asset cost and accumulated depreciation of $25,250 and $8,300, respectively, at December 30, 2017, and $17,987 and $5,881, respectively, at December 31, 2016. Contingencies The Company assesses its exposure related to legal matters, including those pertaining to product liability, safety and health matters and other items that arise in the regular course of its business. If the Company determines that it is probable a loss has been incurred, the amount of the loss, or an amount within the range of loss, that can be reasonably estimated will be recorded. Environmental Remediation The Company accrues for losses associated with environmental remediation obligations when such losses are probable and estimable. Remediation obligations are accrued based on the latest available information and are recorded at undiscounted amounts. The Company regularly monitors the progress of environmental remediation. If studies indicate that the cost of remediation has changed from the previous estimate, an adjustment to the liability would be recorded in the period in which such determination is made. (See Note 20). Legal Proceedings The Company has been sued, together with the 3M Company and approximately 30 other carpet manufacturers, by the Gadsden (Alabama) Water Works in the circuit court of Etowah County Alabama [The Water Works and Sewer Board of the City of Gadsden v. 3M Company, et al, civil action No. 31-CV-2016-900676.00] and by the Town of Centre (Alabama) Water Works in the circuit court of Cherokee County Alabama [The Water Works and Sewer Board of the Town of Centre v. 3M Company, et al, civil action No. 13-CV-2017-900049.00]. Both cases seek monetary damages and injunctive relief related to the use of certain chemical compounds in the manufacture and finishing of carpet products “in and around Dalton Georgia.” On motion of the defendants, the cases were removed to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama (Middle Division) Case No. 4:16-CV-01755-SGC and Case No. 4:17-CV-01026-KOB. Subsequently, the Gadsden Water Works filed a motion to have the case remanded back to the state court and such motion has been granted. The lawsuits allege that perflourinated compounds (“PFC”), perflourinated acid (“PFOA”) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (“PFOS”) manufactured by 3M were used in certain finishing and treatment processes by the defendants and, as a consequence of such use, were subsequently either discharged into or leached into the water systems around Dalton, Georgia. The Complaints seeks damages that exceed $10, but are otherwise unspecified in amount in addition to injunctive relief and punitive damages. The Company intends to defend the matters vigorously and is unable to estimate the potential exposure to loss, if any, at this time. The Company has received a class action complaint filed by Carlos Garcia, a current employee, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated against Fabrica [Carlos Garcia et al. vs. Fabrica International, Inc., et al., in the Superior Court of Orange County, California, Case No. 30-2017-00949461 CU-OE-CXC]. The complaint alleges causes of actions on behalf of classes of Fabrica’s current and former employees during the four-year period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint for failure to pay proper overtime wages, failure to compensate for all meal periods and rest periods, failure to pay all proper overtime and double time, and for the provision and maintaining of inaccurate wage statements. Finally, the complaint asserts a cause of action for unfair competition by means of the above actions and seeks restitution of monies supposedly unlawfully withheld and demands attorneys’ fees and 61 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (amounts in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) costs. The Company has denied liability, is defending the matters vigorously and is unable to estimate the potential exposure to loss, if any, at this time. The Company is one of multiple parties to three current lawsuits filed in Madison County Illinois, styled Brenda Bridgeman, Individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of Robert Bridgeman, Deceased, vs. American Honda Motor Co., Inc., f/k/a Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., et al No. 15-L-374, styled Charles Anderson, Pltf., vs. 3M Company, et al, No. 17-L-525 and styled Danny Atkins and Pamela Atkins, Pltfs., vs. Aurora Pump Company, et al. No. 18-L-2. All three lawsuits entail a claim for damages to be determined in excess of $50 filed on behalf of either a former employee or the estate of an individual which alleges that the deceased contracted mesothelioma as a result of exposure to asbestos while employed by the Company. Discovery in each matter is ongoing, and a tentative trial date has been set for one of the cases. The Company has denied liability, is defending the matters vigorously and is unable to estimate its potential exposure to loss, if any, at this time. In August of 2017, the lawsuit styled Sandra D. Watts, Individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of Dianne Averett, Deceased vs. 4520 Corp., Inc. f/k/a Benjamin F. Shaw Company, et al No. 12-L-2032 was placed in the category of "special closed with settlements and bankruptcy claims pending" to all remaining defendants. NOTE 18 - OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE, NET Other operating (income) expense, net is summarized as follows: Other operating expense, net: (Gain) loss on property, plant and equipment disposals (Gain) loss on currency exchanges Amortization of intangibles Retirement expenses BP settlement gain (1) Miscellaneous (income) expense Other operating expense, net $ $ 2017 2016 2015 170 $ (72) 306 155 — (118) 725 167 305 154 (841) (109) 441 $ 401 $ $ (114) 602 305 212 — (133) 872 (1) On November 21, 2016, the Company entered into a full and final release agreement with BP Exploration and Production, Inc. and various related entities pursuant to which the Company released any and all claims related to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill which occurred on April 20, 2010. In exchange for this release, the Company received a net amount of $841 from the settlement. Other (income) expense, net is summarized as follows: Other expense, net: Earnings from equity investments Miscellaneous (income) expense Other expense, net 2017 2016 2015 — 39 39 $ — 22 22 $ 14 33 47 $ NOTE 19 - FACILITY CONSOLIDATION AND SEVERANCE EXPENSES, NET 2014 Warehousing, Distribution & Manufacturing Consolidation Plan The Company developed a plan to align its warehousing, distribution and manufacturing to support its growth and manufacturing strategy resulting in improved distribution capabilities and customer service. The key element and first major step of this plan was the acquisition of a facility to serve as a finished goods warehouse and a cut-order and distribution center in Adairsville, Georgia. Costs related to the consolidation included moving and relocation expenses, information technology expenses and expenses relating to conversion and realignment of equipment. In addition, this plan included the elimination of both carpet dyeing and yarn dyeing in the Company's Atmore, Alabama facility designed to more fully accommodate the distribution and manufacturing realignment. As a result, the dyeing operations in Atmore were moved to the Company's continuous dyeing facility, skein dyeing operation and other outside dyeing processors. To complete the Warehousing, Distribution & Manufacturing Consolidation Plan, the Company moved its Saraland rug operation from an expiring leased building to an owned facility in March 2016. The Company completed this consolidation plan during 2016. As a result of eliminating its dyeing operations in Atmore, Alabama, the Company disposed of its waste water treatment plant in 2014. Subsequently, after extensive testing, it was determined that the Company still had some contaminants above background 62 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (amounts in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) levels and that it would need to install a soil cap. The Company recognized expenses of $331 during 2016 to finalize the cleanup of the site of the Company's former waste water treatment plant. 2015 Corporate Office Consolidation Plan In April 2015, the Company's Board of Directors approved the Corporate Office Consolidation Plan, to cover the costs of consolidating three of the Company's existing leased divisional and corporate offices to a single leased facility located in Dalton, Georgia. The Company paid a fee to terminate one of the leased facilities, did not renew a second facility and vacated the third facility. Related to the vacated facility, the Company recorded the estimated costs related to the fulfillment of its contractual lease obligation and on-going facility maintenance, net of an estimate of sub-lease expectations. Accordingly, if the estimates differ, the Company would record an additional charge or benefit, as appropriate. Costs related to the consolidation included the lease termination fee, contractual lease obligations and moving costs. 2017 Profit Improvement Plan During the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company announced a Profit Improvement Plan to improve profitability through lower cost and streamlined decision making and aligning processes to maximize efficiency. The plan includes consolidating the management of the Company's two commercial brands, Atlas Carpet Mills and Masland Contract, under one management team, sharing operations in sales, marketing, product development and manufacturing. Specific to this plan includes focusing nearly all commercial solution dyed make-to-order production in our Atmore, Alabama operations where the Company has developed such make-to-order capabilities over the last 5 years. Further, the Company is aligning its west coast production facilities, better utilizing its west coast real estate by moving production to its Porterville, California and Atmore, Alabama operations and preparing for more efficient distribution of its west coast products. In addition, the Company had reductions in related support functions such as accounting and information services. Costs related to the facility consolidation plans are summarized as follows: Accrued Balance at December 31, 2016 2017 Expenses (1) 2017 Cash Payments Accrued Balance at December 30, 2017 Total Costs Incurred to Date Total Expected Costs As of December 30, 2017 Warehousing, Distribution and Manufacturing Consolidation Plan Corporate Office Consolidation Plan Profit Improvement Plan Total All Plans $ $ 266 248 — 514 $ $ (4) $ 262 $ — $ 7,440 $ 7,440 4 636 636 $ 81 302 645 $ 171 334 505 807 636 $ 8,883 $ 807 1,382 9,629 Accrued Balance at December 26, 2015 2016 Expenses (1) 2016 Cash Payments Accrued Balance at December 31, 2016 Warehousing, Distribution and Manufacturing Consolidation Plan Corporate Office Consolidation Plan Total All Plans $ $ — $ 1,381 $ 1,115 $ 341 341 75 168 $ 1,456 $ 1,283 $ 266 248 514 (1) Costs incurred under these plans are classified as "facility consolidation and severance expenses, net" in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations. 63 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (amounts in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) NOTE 20 - DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS The Company has either sold or discontinued certain operations that are accounted for as "Discontinued Operations" under applicable accounting guidance. Discontinued operations are summarized as follows: Net sales - Carousel operations Loss from discontinued operations: Loss from Carousel operations Workers' compensation costs from former textile operations Environmental remediation costs from former textile operations Loss from discontinued operations, before taxes Income tax benefit Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax Income on disposal of Carousel discontinued operations before income taxes Income tax provision Income on disposal of discontinued operations, net of tax $ $ $ $ $ $ 2017 2016 2015 — $ — $ 417 — $ — $ (155) (225) (380) $ (147) (233) $ — $ — — $ (2) (216) (218) $ (87) (131) $ 100 40 60 $ $ (116) (53) (68) (237) (89) (148) — — — Undiscounted reserves are maintained for the self-insured workers' compensation obligations related to the Company's former textile operations. These reserves are administered by a third-party workers' compensation service provider under the supervision of Company personnel. Such reserves are reassessed on a quarterly basis. Pre-tax cost incurred for workers' compensation as a component of discontinued operations primarily represents a change in estimate for each period from unanticipated medical costs associated with the Company's obligations. Reserves for environmental remediation obligations are established on an undiscounted basis. The Company has an accrual for environmental remediation obligations related to discontinued operations of $1,746 as of December 30, 2017 and $1,686 as of December 31, 2016. The liability established represents the Company's best estimate of possible loss and is the reasonable amount to which there is any meaningful degree of certainty given the periods of estimated remediation and the dollars applicable to such remediation for those periods. The actual timeline to remediate, and thus, the ultimate cost to complete such remediation through these remediation efforts, may differ significantly from our estimates. Pre-tax cost for environmental remediation obligations classified as discontinued operations were primarily a result of specific events requiring action and additional expense in each period. NOTE 21 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS The Company is a party to a 5-year lease with the seller of Atlas Carpet Mills, Inc. to lease three manufacturing facilities as part of the acquisition in 2014. The lessor is controlled by an associate of the Company. Rent paid to the lessor during 2017, 2016, and 2015 was $978, $793, and $458. The lease was based on current market values for similar facilities. The Company purchases a portion of its product needs in the form of fiber, yarn and carpet from Engineered Floors, an entity substantially controlled by Robert E. Shaw, a shareholder of the Company. An affiliate of Mr. Shaw holds approximately 7.4% of the Company's Common Stock, which represents approximately 3.5% of the total vote of all classes of the Company's Common Stock. Engineered Floors is one of several suppliers of such materials to the Company. Total purchases from Engineered Floors for 2017, 2016 and 2015 were approximately $7,200, $7,300 and $8,800, respectively; or approximately 2.3%, 2.4%, and 2.8% of the Company's cost of goods sold in 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Purchases from Engineered Floors are based on market value, negotiated prices. The Company has no contractual commitments with Mr. Shaw associated with its business relationship with Engineered Floors. Transactions with Engineered Floors are reviewed annually by the Company's board of directors. The Company is a party to a 10-year lease with the Rothman Family Partnership to lease a manufacturing facility as part of the Robertex acquisition in 2013. The lessor is controlled by an associate of the Company. Rent paid to the lessor during 2017, 2016, and 2015 was $273, $267, and $262, respectively. The lease was based on current market values for similar facilities. In addition, the Company has a note payable to Robert P. Rothman related to the acquisition of Robertex Inc. (See Note 9). 64 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (amounts in thousands, except per share data) (Continued) NOTE 22 - SUBSEQUENT EVENT On March 12, 2018, the Company granted 297,292 shares of restricted stock to certain key employees of the Company. The grant- date fair value of the awards was $832, or $2.800 per share, and will be recognized as stock compensation expense over a weighted- average period of 6.1 years from the date the awards were granted. Each award is subject to a continued service condition. The fair value of each share of restricted stock awarded was equal to the market value of a share of the Company's Common Stock on the grant date. 65 Item 15(a)(2) SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. (dollars in thousands) Balance at Beginning of Year Additions - Charged to Costs and Expenses Additions - Charged to Other Account - Describe Deductions - Describe Balance at End of Year Description Year ended December 30, 2017: Reserves deducted from asset accounts: Allowance for doubtful accounts $ 107 $ 70 $ — $ 44 (1) $ 133 Reserves classified as liabilities: Provision for claims, allowances and warranties Year ended December 31, 2016: Reserves deducted from asset accounts: 6,020 8,291 — 9,020 (2) 5,291 Allowance for doubtful accounts $ 470 $ 38 $ — $ 401 (1) $ 107 Reserves classified as liabilities: Provision for claims, allowances and warranties Year ended December 26, 2015: Reserves deducted from asset accounts: 5,684 10,362 — 10,026 (2) 6,020 Allowance for doubtful accounts $ 450 $ 146 $ — $ 126 (1) $ 470 Reserves classified as liabilities: Provision for claims, allowances and warranties 4,647 14,254 — 13,217 (2) 5,684 (1) Uncollectible accounts written off, net of recoveries. (2) Reserve reductions for claims, allowances and warranties settled. 66 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K ITEM 15(b) EXHIBITS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 30, 2017 THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. DALTON, GEORGIA Exhibit Index EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION (1.1)* (2.1)* (3.1)* (3.2)* (5.1)* (10.1)* (10.2)* (10.3)* (10.4)* (10.5)* (10.6)* (10.7)* (10.8)* (10.9)* (10.10)* (10.11)* (10.12)* (10.13)* Underwriting Agreement for 2,500,000 Shares of The Dixie Group, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (1.1) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 20, 2014.) Securities Purchase Agreement between Masland Carpets, LLC and Robert P. Rothman dated as of June 30, 2013. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (2.1) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 30, 2013.) Text of Restated Charter of The Dixie Group, Inc. as Amended - Blackline Version. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (3.4) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 27, 2003.) Amended By-Laws of The Dixie Group, Inc. as of February 22, 2007. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 26, 2007.) Shelf Registration Statement on Form S-3. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (5.1) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 20, 2014.) The Dixie Group, Inc. New Non-qualified Retirement Savings Plan effective August 1, 1999. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.1) to Dixie's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 26, 1999.)** The Dixie Group, Inc. 2006 Stock Awards Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Annex A to the Company's Proxy Statement for its 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, filed March 20, 2006.)** Summary Description of the 2006 Incentive Compensation Plan, approved February 23, 2006. (Incorporated by reference to Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 1, 2006.)** Summary Description of The Dixie Group, Inc., 2006 Incentive Compensation Plan/Range of Incentives. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.62) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2013.)** Material terms of the performance goals for the period 2007-2011, pursuant to which incentive compensation awards may be made to certain key executives of the Company based on the results achieved by the Company during such years, approved March 14, 2006. (Incorporated by reference to Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 20, 2006.)** Form of Award of Career Shares under the 2006 Incentive Compensation Plan for Participants holding only shares of the Company's Common Stock. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.1) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 6, 2006.)** Form of Award of Career Shares under the 2006 Incentive Compensation Plan for Participants holding shares of the Company's Class B Common Stock. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.2) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 6, 2006.)** Form of Award of Long Term Incentive Plan Shares under the 2006 Incentive Compensation Plan for Participants holding only shares of the Company's Common Stock. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.3) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 6, 2006.)** Form of Award of Long Term Incentive Plan Shares under the 2006 Incentive Compensation Plan for Participants holding shares of the Company's Class B Common Stock. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.4) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 6, 2006.)** Master Lease Agreement, Corporate Guaranty and Schedule to the Master Lease Agreement by and between General Electric Capital Corporation and Masland Carpets, LLC dated August 21, 2009. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.1, 10.2, 10.3) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 25, 2009.) Amended and Modified Financing Agreement, by and between The Dixie Group, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries named therein, and General Electric Credit Corporation, as lender, dated June 26, 2012. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.1) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 26, 2012.) Agreement to Reduce Security Deposit Amount and Amendment to Security Deposit Pledge Agreement, by and between The Dixie Group, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries named therein, and General Electric Credit Corporation, as lender, dated June 26, 2012. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.2) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 26, 2012.) Obligation to the Development Authority of Gordon County; by and among Masland Carpets, LLC, Purchase and Sale Agreement dated December 28, 2012. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4.12) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2012.) 67 (10.14)* (10.15)* (10.16)* (10.17)* (10.18)* (10.19)* (10.20)* (10.21)* (10.22)* (10.23)* (10.24)* (10.25)* (10.26)* (10.27)* (10.28)* (10.29)* (10.30)* (10.31)* (10.32)* (10.33)* Obligation to the Development Authority of Gordon County; by and among Masland Carpets, LLC, Bill of Sale, dated December 28, 2012. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4.12) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2012.) Obligation to the Development Authority of Gordon County; by and among Masland Carpets, LLC, Lease Agreement, dated December 28, 2012. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4.12) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2012.) Obligation to the Development Authority of Gordon County; by and among Masland Carpets, LLC, Short Form Lease Agreement, dated December 28, 2012. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4.12) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2012.) Obligation to the Development Authority of Gordon County; by and among Masland Carpets, LLC, Option Agreement, dated December 28, 2012. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4.12) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2012.) Obligation to the Development Authority of Gordon County; by and among Masland Carpets, LLC, Pilot Agreement, dated December 28, 2012. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4.12) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2012.) Obligation to the Development Authority of Gordon County; by and among Masland Carpets, LLC, Loan Agreement, dated December 28, 2012. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4.12) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2012.) Obligation to the Development Authority of Gordon County; by and among Masland Carpets, LLC, Loan and Security Agreement, dated December 28, 2012. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4.12) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2012.) Obligation to the Development Authority of Gordon County; by and among Masland Carpets, LLC, Deed to Secure Debt and Security Agreement, dated December 28, 2012. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4.12) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2012.) Obligation to the Development Authority of Gordon County; by and among Masland Carpets, LLC, Notice and Consent to Assignment, dated December 28, 2012. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4.12) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2012.) Obligation to the Development Authority of Gordon County; by and among Masland Carpets, LLC, Absolute Assignment of Deed to Secure Debt and Security Agreement and Other Loan Documents, dated December 28, 2012. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4.12) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2012.) Obligation to the Development Authority of Murray County; by and among TDG Operations, LLC, Series 2014 Bond, dated October 17, 2014. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.48) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 27, 2014.) Obligation to the Development Authority of Murray County; by and among TDG Operations, LLC, PILOT Agreement, dated October 1, 2014. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.49) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 27, 2014.) Obligation to the Development Authority of Murray County; by and among TDG Operations, LLC, Bond Purchase Loan Agreement, dated October 1, 2014. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.50) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 27, 2014.) Obligation to the Development Authority of Murray County; by and among TDG Operations, LLC, Option Agreement, dated October 1, 2014.(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.51) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 27, 2014.) Obligation to the Development Authority of Murray County; by and among TDG Operations, LLC, Bill of Sale, dated October 1, 2014. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.52) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 27, 2014.) Obligation to the Development Authority of Murray County; by and among TDG Operations, LLC, Assignment of Rents and Leases and Security Agreement dated October 1, 2014. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.53) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 27, 2014.) Project Development Agreement, by and between TDG Operations, LLC, a Georgia Limited Liability Company doing business as Masland Carpets and the City of Atmore, Alabama, dated December 11, 2014. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.54) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 27, 2014.) Credit Agreement, by and among The Dixie Group, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries, as Borrowers, cert of its subsidiaries, as Guarantor, the Lendors from time to time party thereto, Wells Fargo Bank Capital Finance LLC, as Administrative Agent, and co-lender and Bank of America and the Other parties thereto, dated September 13, 2011. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.10) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 14, 2011.) Security Agreement, by and among The Dixie Group, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries, as Borrowers, certain of its subsidiaries, as Guarantor, the Lenders from time to time party thereto, Wells Fargo Bank Capital Finance LLC, as Administrative Agent, and co-lender and Bank of America and the Other parties thereto, dated September 13, 2011. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.11) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 14, 2011.) Form of Mortgages, by and among The Dixie Group, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries, as Borrowers, certain of its subsidiaries, as Guarantor, the Lenders from time to time party thereto, Wells Fargo Bank Capital Finance LLC, as Administrative Agent, and co-lender and Bank of America and the Other parties thereto, dated September 13, 2011. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.12) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 14, 2011.) 68 (10.34)* (10.35)* (10.36)* (10.37)* (10.38)* (10.39)* (10.40)* (10.41)* (10.42)* (10.43)* (10.44)* (10.45)* (10.46)* (10.47)* (10.48)* (10.49)* (10.50)* (10.51)* (10.52)* Credit Agreement, by and between The Dixie Group, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries named therein, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as lender, dated September 13, 2011. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.20) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 14, 2011.) Security Agreement, by and between The Dixie Group, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries named therein, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as lender, dated September 13, 2011. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.21) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 14, 2011.) First Mortgage, by and between The Dixie Group, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries named therein, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as lender, dated September 13, 2011. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.22) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 14, 2011.) First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of November 2, 2012, by and among The Dixie Group, Inc., certain of its subsidiaries, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Agent and the persons identified as Lenders therein. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.1) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 5, 2012.) First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of November 2, 2012, by and among The Dixie Group, Inc., certain of it subsidiaries, and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC as Agent and the persons identified as Lenders therein. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.2) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 5, 2012.) Intercreditor Agreement dated as of November 2, 2012, by and among Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Agents and The Dixie Group, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.3) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 5, 2012.) Second Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of April 1, 2013, by and among The Dixie Group, Inc. certain of its subsidiaries and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as Agent and the persons identified as Lenders therein. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.01) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 3, 2013.) Third Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of May 22, 2013, by and among The Dixie Group, Inc. certain of its subsidiaries and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as Agent and the persons identified as Lenders therein. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.57) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2013.) Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of July 1, 2013, by and among The Dixie Group, Inc. certain of its subsidiaries and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as Agent and the persons identified as Lenders therein. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.58) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2013.) Fifth Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of July 30, 2013, by and among The Dixie Group, Inc. certain of its subsidiaries and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as Agent and the persons identified as Lenders therein. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.1) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 10-Q dated August 7, 2013.) Sixth Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of August 30, 2013, by and among The Dixie Group, Inc. certain of its subsidiaries and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as Agent and the persons identified as Lenders therein. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.1) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 10-Q dated November 6, 2013.) Seventh Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of January 20, 2014, by and among The Dixie Group, Inc. certain of its subsidiaries and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as Agent and the persons identified as Lenders therein. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.1) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 21, 2014.) Eighth Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of March 14, 2014, by and among The Dixie Group, Inc. certain of its subsidiaries and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as Agent and the persons identified as Lenders therein. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.2) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 20, 2014.) Term Note 1 dated November 7, 2014, by TDG Operations, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company and First Tennessee Bank National Association. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.71) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 27, 2014.) Deed to Secure Debt, Assignment of Rents and Leases, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by TDG Operations, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company and First Tennessee Bank National Association, dated November 7, 2014. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.72) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 27, 2014.) Term Note 2 dated November 7, 2014, by TDG Operations, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company and First Tennessee Bank National Association. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.73) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 27, 2014.) Amendment to Term Loan Agreement, Note 2, dated November 7, 2014, by TDG Operations, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company and First Tennessee Bank National Association. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.74) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 27, 2014.) Term Note 3 dated January 23, 2015, by TDG Operations, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company and First Tennessee Bank National Association. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.75) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 27, 2014.) Mortgage, Assignment of Rents and Leases, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by TDG Operations, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company and First Tennessee Bank National Association, dated January 23, 2015. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.76) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 27, 2014.) 69 (10.53)* (10.54)* (10.55)* (10.56)* (10.57)* (10.58)* (10.59)* (10.60)* (10.61)* (10.62)* (10.63)* (10.64)* (10.65)* (10.66)* (10.67)* (10.68)* (10.69)* (10.70)* (10.71)* (10.72)* (10.73)* (10.74)* (10.75)* (10.76)* (10.77)* Mortgagee's Subordination and Consent, dated January 23, 2015, by and between Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as Agent, and The Dixie Group, Inc. and it subsidiaries, as Borrower, and First Tennessee Bank National Association, as Mortgagee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.77) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 27, 2014.) Amended and Restated Mortgagee's Subordination and Consent, dated January 23, 2015, by and between Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as Agent, and The Dixie Group, Inc. and it subsidiaries, as Borrower, and First Tennessee Bank National Association, as Mortgagee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.78) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 27, 2014.) Amendment to Deed to Secure Debt, Assignment of Rents and Leases, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing, dated January 23, 2015, between TDG Operations, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company, and First Tennessee Bank National Association. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.79) to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 27, 2014.) Stock Purchase Agreement between TDG Operations, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of The Dixie Group, Inc. and James Horwich, Trustee under the Horwich Trust of 1973, to purchase all outstanding capital stock of Atlas Carpet Mills, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.2) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 20, 2014.) Summary of Annual Incentive Compensation Plan Applicable to 2015. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.1) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 13, 2015.)** Form of LTIP award (B shareholder). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.2) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 13, 2015.)** Form of LTIP award (common only). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.3) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 13, 2015.)** Form of Career Share award (B shareholder). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.4) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 13, 2015.)** Form of Career Share award (common only). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.5) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 13, 2015.)** Form of Retention Grant (Service Condition only). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.6) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 13, 2015.)** Form of Retention Grant (Performance Condition and Service Condition). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.7) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 13, 2015.)** Form of Award of 100,000 share of Restricted Stock under the 2006 Stock Awards Plan to Daniel K. Frierson. (Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit (10.1) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 30, 2015.)** Thornton Edge LLC Lease for Reed Road Facility. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.1) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 10-Q dated November 4, 2015.) Thornton Edge LLC First Lease Amendment for Reed Road Facility. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.2) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 10-Q dated November 4, 2015.) Thornton Edge LLC Second Lease Amendment for Reed Road Facility. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.3) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 10-Q dated November 4, 2015.) 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan. (Incorporate by reference to Appendix A to Dixie's Proxy Statement for the Registrant's Annual Meeting of Shareholders held May 3, 2016.)** Summary of Incentive Plan for 2016. (Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit (10.1) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 11, 2016.)** Long Term Incentive Plan Award B Shareholder. (Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit (10.2) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 11, 2016.)** Long Term Incentive Plan Award Common. (Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit (10.3) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 11, 2016.)** Career Shares B Shareholder. (Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit (10.4) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 11, 2016.)** Career Shares Common. (Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit (10.5) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 11, 2016.)** Tenth Amendment to Credit Agreement, First Amendment to Security Agreement, and First Amendment to Guaranty. (Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit (10.1) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 26, 2016.) Summary of Incentive Plan for 2017. (Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit (10.1) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 10, 2017.)** Form of Stock Option Agreement - Common Stock - 2016 Stock Plan. (Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit (10.1) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 31, 2017.)** Form of Stock Option Agreement - Class B Holder - 2016 Stock Plan. (Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit (10.2) to Dixie's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 31, 2017.)** (10.78) Royalty Carpet Mills Lease for Porterville, California Facility. (Filed herewith.) (14)* Code of Ethics, as amended and restated, February 15, 2010. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14 to Dixie's Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 26, 2009.) 70 (16)* (21) (23) (31.1) (31.2) (32.1) (32.2) Letter from Ernst & Young LLP regarding change in certifying accountant. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 16 to Dixie's Form 8-K dated November 15, 2013.) Subsidiaries of the Registrant. (Filed herewith.) Consent of Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.(Filed herewith.) CEO Certification pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a). (Filed herewith.) CFO Certification pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a). (Filed herewith.) CEO Certification pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b). (Filed herewith.) CFO Certification pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b). (Filed herewith.) (101.INS) XBRL Instance Document. (Filed herewith.) (101.SCH) XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. (Filed herewith.) (101.CAL) XBRL Taxaonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. (Filed herewith.) (101.DEF) XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. (Filed herewith.) (101.LAB) XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. (Filed herewith.) (101.PRE) XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. (Filed herewith.) * Commission File No. 0-2585. ** Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. 71 P R O X Y S T A T E M E N T UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549 SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION (Rule 14a-101) Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. ) Filed by the Registrant Filed by a Party other than the Registrant Check the appropriate box: Preliminary Proxy Statement Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) Definitive Proxy Statement Definitive Additional Materials Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12 The Dixie Group, Inc. (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): No fee required. Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: Total fee paid: Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. 1) 2) 3) 4) Amount Previously Paid: Form, Schedule or Registrant Statement No.: Filing Party: Date Filed: THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. 475 Reed Road Dalton, Georgia 30720 (706) 876-5800 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS To the Shareholders of The Dixie Group, Inc.: The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of The Dixie Group, Inc. will be held at the Corporate Office, 475 Reed Road, Dalton, Georgia, on May 2, 2018 at 8:00 a.m., Eastern Time, for the following purposes: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. To elect eight individuals to the Board of Directors for a term of one year each; To cast an advisory vote on the Company’s Executive Compensation for its named executive officers (“Say-on- Pay”); To cast an advisory vote on the frequency of future say-on-pay votes; To ratify appointment of Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP to serve as independent registered public accountants of the Company for 2018; and Such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting of Shareholders or any adjournment thereof. Only shareholders of record of the Common Stock and Class B Common Stock at the close of business on February 23, 2018, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof. Your attention is directed to the Proxy Statement accompanying this Notice for more complete information regarding the matters to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting. The Dixie Group, Inc. Daniel K. Frierson Chairman of the Board Dalton, Georgia Dated: March 23, 2018 PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED MATERIAL CAREFULLY AND COMPLETE, DATE AND SIGN THE ENCLOSED PROXY AND RETURN IT PROMPTLY TO THE COMPANY IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE SO THAT YOUR SHARES OF COMMON STOCK AND CLASS B COMMON STOCK WILL BE REPRESENTED AT THE MEETING. IF YOU ATTEND THE MEETING, YOU MAY REVOKE YOUR PROXY AND VOTE YOUR SHARES IN PERSON, SHOULD YOU SO DESIRE. Important Notice Regarding Internet Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 2, 2018 The proxy statement and annual report to shareholders are available under "Annual Report and Proxy Materials" at www.thedixiegroup.com/investor/investor.html. THE DIXIE GROUP, INC. 475 Reed Road Dalton, Georgia 30720 Phone (706) 876-5800 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS May 2, 2018 PROXY STATEMENT INTRODUCTION The enclosed Proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Company for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders. This Proxy Statement and the enclosed Proxy will be mailed on or about March 23, 2018, to shareholders of record of the Company’s Common Stock and Class B Common Stock as of the close of business on February 23, 2018. At the Annual Meeting, holders of the Company’s Common Stock, $3.00 par value per share (“Common Stock”), and Class B Common Stock, $3.00 par value per share (“Class B Common Stock”), will be asked to: (i) elect eight (8) individuals to the Board of Directors for a term of one year each, (ii) cast an advisory vote on the Company’s executive compensation for its named executive officers; (iii) cast an advisory vote on the frequency of the shareholder advisory vote on executive compensation; (iv) ratify the appointment of Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP to serve as independent registered public accountants of the Company for 2018, and (v) transact any other business that may properly come before the meeting. The Board of Directors recommends that the Company’s shareholders vote (i) FOR electing the eight (8) nominees for director; (ii) FOR approving the Company’s executive compensation of its named executive officers; (iii) FOR setting the frequency of the shareholder advisory vote on executive compensation at an annual vote; (iv) FOR ratifying the appointment of Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP to serve as independent registered public accountants of the Company for 2018. RECORD DATE, VOTE REQUIRED AND RELATED MATTERS The Board has fixed the close of business on February 23, 2018, as the Record Date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. In accordance with the Company’s Charter, each outstanding share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote, and each outstanding share of Class B Common Stock is entitled to 20 votes, exercisable in person or by properly executed Proxy, on each matter brought before the Annual Meeting. Cumulative voting is not permitted. As of February 23, 2018, 15,279,812 shares of Common Stock, representing 15,279,812 votes, were held of record by approximately 2,800 shareholders (including an estimated 2,400 shareholders whose shares are held in nominee names) and 861,499 shares of Class B Common Stock, representing 17,229,980 votes, were held by 10 individual shareholders, together representing an aggregate of 32,509,792 votes. Shares represented at the Annual Meeting by properly executed Proxy will be voted in accordance with the instructions indicated therein unless such Proxy has previously been revoked. If no instructions are indicated, such shares will be voted (i) FOR electing the eight (8) nominees for director; (ii) FOR approving the Company’s executive compensation of its named executive officers; (iii) FOR setting the frequency of the shareholder advisory vote on executive compensation at an annual vote; (iv) FOR ratifying the appointment of Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP to serve as independent registered public accountants of the Company for 2018. Any Proxy given pursuant to this solicitation may be revoked at any time by the shareholder giving it by (i) delivering to the Corporate Secretary of the Company a written notice of revocation bearing a later date than the Proxy, (ii) submitting a later- dated, properly executed Proxy, or (iii) revoking the Proxy and voting in person at the Annual Meeting. Attendance at the Annual Meeting will not, in and of itself, constitute a revocation of a Proxy. Any written notice revoking a Proxy should be sent to The Dixie Group, Inc., P.O. Box 2007, Dalton, Georgia 30722-2007, Attention: Derek Davis. The persons designated as proxies were selected by the Board of Directors and are Daniel K. Frierson, Lowry F. Kline and Michael L. Owens. The cost of solicitation of Proxies will be borne by the Company. The presence, in person or by Proxy, of the holders of a majority of the aggregate outstanding vote of Common Stock and Class B Common Stock entitled to vote is necessary to constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting. In accordance with Tennessee law, Directors are elected by the affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes cast in person or by Proxy at the Annual Meeting. 1 Approval of the Company’s executive compensation for its named executive officers will be deemed to have been obtained if the number of votes properly cast in favor of such compensation exceeds the number of votes cast against such compensation. With respect to the advisory vote on the frequency of say-on-pay advisory votes, the option that receives the highest number of votes will be deemed to have been selected by shareholders. Ratification of the appointment of Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP to serve as independent registered public accountants of the Company for 2018 will be approved if the votes properly cast favoring ratification exceed the votes cast opposing ratification. Shares covered by abstentions and broker non-votes, while counted for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum at the Annual Meeting, are not considered to be affirmative or negative votes. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect upon the election of a nominee for director, so long as such nominee receives any affirmative votes. A copy of the Company’s Annual Report for the year-ended December 30, 2017, is enclosed herewith. The Board is not aware of any other matter to be brought before the Annual Meeting for a vote of shareholders. If, however, other matters are properly presented, Proxies representing shares of Common Stock and Class B Common Stock will be voted in accordance with the best judgment of the proxy holders. 2 PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS Shareholders of record at the close of business on February 23, 2018, the Record Date, will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. The following is information regarding beneficial owners of more than 5% of the Company's Common Stock or Class B Common Stock. Beneficial ownership information is also presented for (i) the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table; (ii) all directors and nominees; and (iii) all directors and executive officers, as a group, as of February 23, 2018 (except as otherwise noted). Name and Address of Beneficial Owner Title of Class Daniel K. Frierson 111 East and West Road Common Stock Lookout Mountain, TN 37350 Class B Common Stock Number of Shares Beneficially Owned(1)(2) % of Class 979,383 861,499 (3) (4) 6 % 100.0 % Dimensional Fund Advisors, L.P. Palisades West, Building One, 6300 Bee Cave Road Austin, TX 78746 Hodges Capital Holdings, Inc. 2905 Maple Avenue Dallas, TX 75201 Royce & Associates, LLC 745 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10151 Robert E. Shaw 115 West King Street Dalton, GA 30722-1005 Terry Ledbetter, Jr. 400 West Louisiana Street McKinney, TX 75009 Wells Fargo & Company 420 Montgomery Street San Francisco, CA 94163 Common Stock 1,103,000 (5) 7.2 % Common Stock 1,762,240 (6) 11.5 % Common Stock 1,549,912 (7) 10.1 % Common Stock 1,125,000 (8) 7.4 % Common Stock 806,958 (9) 5.3 % Common Stock 1,753,472 (10) 11.5 % 3 Additional Directors and Executive Officers Title of Class Number of Shares Beneficially Owned (1) % of Class William F. Blue, Jr. Common Stock 22,771 (10) Charles E. Brock Common Stock 14,541 (11) Paul B. Comiskey Common Stock 96,203 (12) W. Derek Davis Jon A. Faulkner D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr. Common Stock 69,409 (13) Common Stock 138,236 (14) Common Stock Class B Common Stock 218,456 187,751 (15) (4) 1.3 % 21.8 % * * * * * E. David Hobbs Common Stock 6,140 (16) Walter W. Hubbard Common Stock 25,401 (17) Lowry F. Kline Hilda S. Murray Common Stock 57,899 (18) Common Stock 14,541 (20) John W. Murrey, III Common Stock 43,679 (21) T.M. Nuckols, Jr. Common Stock 20,000 (22) Michael L. Owens Common Stock 10,375 (23) * * * * * * All Directors, Named Executive Officers and Executive Officers as Group (14 Persons) ** Common Stock Class B Common Stock 1,717,034 861,499 (24) (25) 10.6 % 100.0 % * Percentage of shares beneficially owned does not exceed 1% of the Class. ** The total vote of Common Stock and Class B Common Stock represented by the shares held by all directors and executive officers as a group is 17,895,079 votes or 55% of the total vote. (1) (2) Under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and for the purposes of these disclosures, a person is deemed to be a “beneficial owner” of a security if that person has or shares “voting power,” which includes the power to vote or to direct the voting of such security, or “investment power,” which includes the power to dispose or to direct the disposition of such security. Under these rules, more than one person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of the same securities. The Class B Common Stock is convertible on a share-for-share basis into shares of Common Stock, and accordingly, outstanding shares of such stock are treated as having been converted to shares of Common Stock for purposes of determining both the number and percentage of class of Common Stock for persons set forth in the table who hold such shares. Does not include 227,219 shares of Common Stock owned by The Dixie Group, Inc. 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan (the “401(k) Plan”) for which Daniel K. Frierson is a fiduciary and for which Bank of America, N.A. serves as Trustee. Participants in the 401(k) Plan may direct the voting of all shares of Common Stock held in their accounts, and the Trustee must vote all shares of Common Stock held in the 401(k) Plan in the ratio reflected by such direction. Participants may also direct the disposition of such shares. Accordingly, for purposes of these disclosures, shares held for participants in the 401(k) Plan are reported as beneficially owned by the participants. 4 (3) Mr. Daniel K. Frierson's beneficial ownership of Common Stock and Class B Common Stock may be summarized as follows: Shares held outright Shares held in his Individual Retirement Account Shares held in 401(k) Plan Shares held by his wife Shares held by his children, their spouses and grandchildren Unvested restricted stock Shares held by family Unitrust Exercisable Stock Option Deemed conversion of his Class B Common Stock Total (a) Sole voting and investment power (b) Shared voting and investment power (c) Sole voting and shared investment power Number of Shares Common Stock 3,263 3,567 796 — 51,508 8,750 — 50,000 861,499 979,383 (a) (a) (b) (a) (a) Number of Shares Class B Common Stock 394,350 17,061 — 94,879 245,973 103,750 5,486 — — 861,499 (a) (a) (c) (c) (a) (a) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) The 861,499 includes 340,852 shares of Class B Common Stock are held subject to a Shareholder's Agreement among Daniel K. Frierson, his wife, two of their five children (including D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr.) and certain family trusts which hold Class B Common Stock, pursuant to which Daniel K. Frierson has been granted a proxy to vote such shares. The Shareholder's Agreement relates only to shares of Class B Common Stock held by each of the parties to the agreement. Pursuant to the agreement Daniel K. Frierson is granted a proxy to vote such shares of Class B Common Stock so long as they remain subject to the agreement. The Class B Common Stock is convertible on a share for share basis in to shares of Common Stock; however, upon conversion such shares are no longer subject to the agreement. Nevertheless, the parties to the agreement may be deemed to be members of a "group" for purposes of Section 13(d) of the act and for purposes of reporting beneficial ownership of the Common Stock of The Dixie Group, Inc., and accordingly Daniel K. Frierson, and the other parties to the agreement have jointly filed a report on Schedule 13(d) reporting beneficial ownership of the Common Stock which they own. Dimensional Fund Advisors, L.P. has reported beneficial ownership of an aggregate of 1,103,000 shares of Common Stock, as follows: 1,079,869 shares of Common Stock, for which it has sole voting power, and 1,103,000 shares of Common Stock for which it has sole dispositive power. The reported information is based upon the Schedule 13G filed by Dimensional Fund Advisors, L.P. with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 9, 2018. Hodges Capital Holdings, Inc. Craig Hodges, First Dallas Securities, Inc., Hodges Capital Management, Inc., Hodges Fund, and Hodges Pure Contrarian Fund has reported beneficial ownership of an aggregate of 1,762,240 shares of Common Stock. Hodges Capital Holdings, Inc. reports having shared voting power of 1,582,000 and 1,762,240 shared dispositive power. The reported information is based upon the Schedule 13G filed by Hodges Capital Holdings, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 5, 2018. Royce & Associates LLC has reported beneficial ownership of 1,549,912 shares of Common Stock for which it has sole dispositive power and sole voting power. The reported information is based upon the Schedule 13G filed by Royce & Associates LP with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 22, 2018. Robert E. Shaw has reported the beneficial ownership of an aggregate of 1,125,000 shares of Common Stock for which he has 1,125,000 shared voting power and 1,125,000 shared dispositive power. The reported information is based upon the Schedule 13G filed by Mr. Shaw with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 1, 2018. Terry Ledbetter, Jr. has reported the beneficial ownership of an aggregate of 806,958 shares of Common Stock for which he has 424,008 shared voting power and 806,958 shared dispositive power. The reported information is based upon the Schedule 13G filed by Kopion Asset Management, LLC and Mr. Ledbetter, founder and manager of Kopion Asset Management, LLC, with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 25, 2018. (10) Wells Fargo & Company has reported the beneficial ownership of an aggregate of 1,753,472 shares of Common Stock, on behalf the following subsidiaries: Wells Capital Management Incorporated, Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC. It has reported 904,675 shares of Common Stock for which it has shared voting power. The reported information is based on a Form 13G filed on January 17, 2018. 5 (10) Mr. William F. Blue's beneficial ownership may be summarized as follows: Shares held outright Performance Units, convertible into shares of Common Stock on retirement as a director Total (11) Mr. Charles E. Brock's beneficial ownership may be summarized as follows: Shares held outright Performance Units, convertible into shares of Common Stock on retirement as a director Total (12) Mr. Paul B. Comiskey's beneficial ownership may be summarized as follows: Shares held outright Unvested Restricted Stock Held in 401(k) Plan Exercisable Stock Options Total (13) Mr. W. Derek Davis's beneficial ownership may be summarized as follows: Shares held outright Shares held by his wife Unvested Restricted Stock Held in 401(k) Plan Exercisable Stock Options Total (14) Mr. Jon A. Faulkner's beneficial ownership may be summarized as follows: Shares held outright Unvested Restricted Stock Exercisable Stock Options Total Number of Shares Common Stock 12,609 10,162 22,771 Number of Shares Common Stock — 14,541 14,541 Number of Shares Common Stock 51,403 26,000 800 18,000 96,203 Number of Shares Common Stock 53,552 4,500 4,600 4,257 2,500 69,409 Number of Shares Common Stock 55,693 71,543 11,000 138,236 6 (15) Mr. D. Kennedy Frierson Jr.'s beneficial ownership may be summarized as follows: Number of Shares Common Stock Number of Shares Class B Common Stock Shares held outright Shares held by his wife Shares held in trust(s) for children Shares held in 401(k) Unvested Restricted Stock (15) Mr. D. Kennedy Frierson Jr.'s beneficial ownership may be summarized as follows: Exercisable Stock Options — 100 2,585 2,301 3,719 22,000 89,038 (a) — 15,540 (a) — 83,173 (a) — Deemed conversion of Class B Stock Total 187,751 Number of Shares 218,456 Common Stock Number of Shares Class B 187,751 Common Stock — (a) Shares held outright (a) Subject to Shareholder's Agreement described in Note (4), above. Mr. Kennedy Frierson has sole investment power, 89,038 (a) — Shares held by his wife and no voting power with respect to such shares. Shares held in trust(s) for children (16) Mr. E. David Hobbs' beneficial ownership may be summarized as follows: Shares held in 401(k) Unvested Restricted Stock Exercisable Stock Options Shares held outright Deemed conversion of Class B Stock Unvested Restricted Stock Total Total 100 2,585 2,301 3,719 22,000 187,751 218,456 — 15,540 (a) — 83,173 (a) Number of Shares Common Stock — 4,215 — (a) 1,925 187,751 (a) Subject to Shareholder's Agreement described in Note (4), above. Mr. Kennedy Frierson has sole investment power, 6,140 and no voting power with respect to such shares. (17) Mr. Walter W. Hubbard's beneficial ownership may be summarized as follows: (16) Mr. E. David Hobbs' beneficial ownership may be summarized as follows: Shares held outright Shares held outright Performance Units, convertible into shares of Common Stock on retirement as a director Unvested Restricted Stock Total Total (18) Mr. Lowry F. Kline's beneficial ownership may be summarized as follows: (17) Mr. Walter W. Hubbard's beneficial ownership may be summarized as follows: Shares held outright Shares held outright Performance Units, convertible into shares of Common Stock on retirement as a director Performance Units, convertible into shares of Common Stock on retirement as a director Total Total (20) Ms. Hilda S. Murray's beneficial ownership may be summarized as follows: (18) Mr. Lowry F. Kline's beneficial ownership may be summarized as follows: Shares held outright Shares held outright Performance Units, convertible into shares of Common Stock on retirement as a director Performance Units, convertible into shares of Common Stock on retirement as a director Total Total (20) Ms. Hilda S. Murray's beneficial ownership may be summarized as follows: Shares held outright Performance Units, convertible into shares of Common Stock on retirement as a director 7 Total Number of Shares Number of Shares Common Stock Common Stock — 4,215 25,401 1,925 25,401 6,140 Number of Shares Common Stock Number of Shares Common Stock 31,198 — 26,701 25,401 57,899 25,401 Number of Shares Number of Shares Common Stock Common Stock — 31,198 14,541 26,701 14,541 57,899 Number of Shares Common Stock — 14,541 14,541 7  (21) Mr. John W. Murrey's beneficial ownership may be summarized as follows: Shares held outright Held by wife Performance Units, convertible into shares of Common Stock on retirement as a director Total (22) Mr. T.M. Nuckols, Jr.'s beneficial ownership may be summarized as follows: (21) Mr. John W. Murrey's beneficial ownership may be summarized as follows: Shares held outright Shares held outright Unvested Restricted Stock Held by wife Held in 401(k) plan Performance Units, convertible into shares of Common Stock on retirement as a director Exercisable Stock Options Total Total (22) Mr. T.M. Nuckols, Jr.'s beneficial ownership may be summarized as follows: (23) Mr. Michael L. Owens' beneficial ownership may be summarized as follows: Shares held outright Shares held outright Unvested Restricted Stock Performance Units, convertible into shares of Common Stock on retirement as a director Held in 401(k) plan Total Exercisable Stock Options Number of Shares Common Stock 3,468 500 39,711 43,679 Number of Shares Common Stock Number of Shares Common Stock — 3,468 20,000 500 — 39,711 — 43,679 20,000 Number of Shares Common Stock Number of Shares Common Stock — — 20,000 10,375 — 10,375 — 20,000 Total (24) (23) Mr. Michael L. Owens' beneficial ownership may be summarized as follows: Includes: (i) 215,401 shares of Common Stock owned directly by individuals in this group; (ii) 8,154 shares of Common Stock allocated to accounts in the 401(k) Plan of members of this group; (iii) options, which are either immediately exercisable, or exercisable within 60 days of the Record Date to purchase 118,500 shares of Common Stock; (iv) options which are not yet vested of 110,000 shares of Common Stock; (v) 141,432 shares of Common Stock held pursuant to performance units issued as payment of one-half of the annual retainer for the Company's non-employee directors; (vi) 81,508 shares of Common Stock owned by immediate family members of certain members of this group; (vii) 3,567 shares held in individual retirement accounts; (viii) 136,537 unvested restricted shares of Common Stock held by individuals in this group, which shares may be voted by such individuals; and (ix) 861,499 shares of Class B Common Stock held by individuals in this group, that could be converted on a share for share basis into shares of Common Stock. Number of Shares Common Stock Performance Units, convertible into shares of Common Stock on retirement as a director Shares held outright 10,375 — Total (25) (24) Includes: (i) 861,499 shares of Class B Common Stock held subject to the Shareholder Agreement described in Note (4) above. Includes: (i) 215,401 shares of Common Stock owned directly by individuals in this group; (ii) 8,154 shares of Common Stock allocated to accounts in the 401(k) Plan of members of this group; (iii) options, which are either immediately exercisable, or exercisable within 60 days of the Record Date to purchase 118,500 shares of Common Stock; (iv) options which are not yet vested of 110,000 shares of Common Stock; (v) 141,432 shares of Common Stock held pursuant to performance units issued as payment of one-half of the annual retainer for the Company's non-employee directors; (vi) 81,508 shares of Common Stock owned by immediate family members of certain members of this group; (vii) 3,567 shares held in individual retirement accounts; (viii) 136,537 unvested restricted shares of Common Stock held by individuals in this group, which shares may be voted by such individuals; and (ix) 861,499 shares of Class B Common Stock held by individuals in this group, that could be converted on a share for share basis into shares of Common Stock. 10,375 (25) Includes: (i) 861,499 shares of Class B Common Stock held subject to the Shareholder Agreement described in Note (4) above. 8 8 PROPOSAL ONE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS Information About Nominees for Director Pursuant to the Company’s Bylaws, all Directors are elected to serve a one year term, or until their successors are elected and qualified. The Board of Directors is permitted to appoint directors to fill the unexpired terms of directors who resign. The names of the nominees for election to the Board, their ages, their principal occupation or employment (which has continued for at least the past five years unless otherwise noted), directorships held by them in other publicly-held corporations or investment companies, the dates they first became directors of the Company, and certain other relevant information with respect to such nominees are as follows: William F. Blue, Jr., age 59, is Chairman of the Board of The Hopeway Foundation in Charlotte, North Carolina. From 2008 until his retirement in 2014, he served as Vice Chairman of Investment Banking and Capital Markets, part of Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, in Charlotte. Throughout his 29-year investment banking career, he represented foreign and domestic corporations in financing and advisory assignments, including acquisitions, divestitures, recapitalizations, fairness opinions, and public and private equity and debt offerings. From 1998 until 2008, Mr. Blue served as group head of the Wachovia Consumer and Retail Investment Banking group. Before joining Wachovia, he was a managing director in the Mergers and Acquisitions group of NationsBanc Montgomery Securities, the predecessor firm to Banc of America Securities. Mr. Blue is a member of the Company's Audit Committee, the Company's Compensation Committee and the Company's Executive Committee. He has been a director of the Company since October 2014. Charles E. Brock, age 53, is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Launch Tennessee, a public-private partnership, focused on the development of high-growth companies in Tennessee. Previously, he served as the Executive Entrepreneur of The Company Lab, a Chattanooga organization that serves as “the Front Door for Entrepreneurs” in Southeast Tennessee and one of Launch Tennessee's regional accelerators. Mr. Brock was a founding partner of the Chattanooga Renaissance Fund, a locally based angel investment group. Mr. Brock also serves as a director of Four Bridges Capital Advisors, a Chattanooga based boutique investment bank as well as director of Pinnacle Financial Partners. Mr. Brock is a member of the Company’s Audit Committee and a member of the Company's Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee. He has been a director of the Company since 2012. Daniel K. Frierson, age 76, is Chairman of the Board of the Company, a position he has held since 1987. He also has been Chief Executive Officer of the Company since 1980 and a director of the Company since 1973. Mr. Frierson serves as a director of Astec Industries, Inc., a manufacturer of specialized equipment for building and restoring the world’s infrastructure headquartered in Chattanooga, Tennessee, and Printpack, Inc., a world leading Flexible Packaging Company, headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia. Mr. Frierson is Chairman of the Compensation Committee. D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr., age 51, is Chief Operating Officer of the Company, a position he has held since 2009. He has been President of Masland Residential, General Manager of Dixie Home, President of Bretlin as well as various other positions in operations, sales and senior management of the Company since 1998. He has been a director of the Company since 2012. Walter W. Hubbard, age 74, served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Honeywell Nylon, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Honeywell International, a manufacturer of nylon products from 2003 until his retirement in 2005. Prior to becoming President of Honeywell Nylon, Mr. Hubbard served as Group Vice President, Fiber Products of BASF Corporation from 1994 until 2003. Mr. Hubbard is a member of the Company’s Audit Committee and the Company's Compensation Committee. He has been a director of the Company since 2005. Lowry F. Kline, age 77, served as a director of Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc. from April 2000 until April 2008, serving as Chairman from April 2002 until April 2008, and as Vice Chairman from April 2000 to April 2003. Mr. Kline served as Chief Executive Officer of Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc. from April 2001 until January 2004 and from December 2005 to April 2006. Prior to becoming Chief Executive Officer for Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc., he held a number of positions with said company, including Chief Administrative Officer, Executive Vice President and General Counsel. Mr. Kline is a member of the Board of Directors of Jackson Furniture Industries, Inc., headquartered in Cleveland, Tennessee and is a former director of McKee Foods Corporation, headquartered in Collegedale, Tennessee. Mr. Kline is Chairman of the Company’s Compensation Committee and a member of the Company’s Audit Committee and a member of the Company’s Executive Committee. He has been a director of the Company since 2004. Hilda S. Murray, age 63, is the Corporate Secretary and Executive Vice President of TPC Printing & Packaging, a specialty packaging and printing company in Chattanooga, TN. She is also founder and President of Greener Planet, LLC, an environmental compliance consultant to the packaging and printing industry. Ms. Murray is a member of the Company’s Audit Committee and the Company’s Governance Committee. She has been a director of the Company since 2012. 9 Michael L. Owens, age 61, is Assistant Dean of Graduate Programs and Lecturer in the College of Business at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, Chattanooga, Tennessee. Prior to joining the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, Mr. Owens was President of Coverdell & Company, Atlanta, Georgia. Prior to joining Coverdell, he was Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Monumental Life Insurance Company. He has been a director of the Company since 2014 and is Chairman of the Company's Audit Committee. D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr., the Company’s Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, is the son of Daniel K. Frierson. No other director, nominee, or executive officer of the Company has any family relationship, not more remote than first cousin, to any other director, nominee, or executive officer. Considerations with Respect to Nominees In selecting the slate of nominees for 2018, the independent directors of the Board considered the familiarity of the Company’s incumbent Directors with the business and prospects of the Company, developed as a result of their service on the Company’s Board. The Board believes that such familiarity will be helpful in their service on the Company’s Board. With respect to all nominees, the independent directors of the Board noted the particular qualifications, experience, attributes and skills possessed by each nominee. These qualifications are reflected in the business experience listed under each nominee’s name, above. In order of the list of nominees, such information may be summarized as follows: Mr. Blue is an experienced investment banker having been Vice Chairman of Wells Fargo Securities and involved with capital formation, mergers, acquisitions and financing of various types of ventures. Mr. Brock is experienced in establishing new businesses having been involved in the establishment of both Foxmark Media and CapitalMark Bank and Trust. Mr. Daniel K. Frierson has served with the Company in several management and executive capacities his entire adult life, and has been Chief Executive Officer since 1980 and a Board member since 1973. In such capacity, he has been instrumental in planning and implementing the transition of the Company to its current position as a manufacturer of residential and commercial floorcovering products. Additionally, Mr. Frierson has experience as a board member of other public companies as well as significant trade group experience relevant to the Company’s business. He is well known and respected throughout the industry. Mr. D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr. has served with the Company in various capacities since 1992. He is currently Chief Operating Officer and has most recently led the Company’s Masland Residential business. Mr. Hubbard has highly relevant industry experience with businesses that are fiber producers and fiber suppliers, and that have served as fiber suppliers to the Company. Mr. Hubbard’s experience in the management of Honeywell Nylon and BASF Corporation, as outlined above, has given him valuable experience in management, relevant to his duties as a Director of the Company. Ms. Murray has a long history of executive management experience at TPC Printing and Packaging, a provider to the specialty packaging business as well as experience with environmental controls and footprint through Greener Planet. Mr. Kline has a long history of management and board level experience with the world’s largest bottler and distributor of Coca Cola Products. Additionally, he has an extensive background in business, corporate and securities law. Mr. Kline has served as a Director of the Company for several years, as reflected above, and chairs the Company’s Compensation Committee. Mr. Owens has extensive business and management experience, having served as President of Coverdell & Company prior to joining the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga. In addition, he has auditing experience having been employed as a certified public accountant and is Chairman of the Company's Audit Committee The Board of Directors recommends that the Company’s shareholders vote FOR electing the eight (8) nominees for director. 10 MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meetings of the Board of Directors The Board of Directors of the Company met five (5) times in 2017. Committees, Attendance, and Directors' Fees The Company has a standing Executive Committee, Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee. Copies of the Charters of the Company’s Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominations and Corporate Governance Committees may be found on the Company’s website at www.thedixiegroup.com/investor/ investor.html. Members of the Executive Committee are Daniel K. Frierson, Chairman, William F. Blue, Jr. and Lowry F. Kline. Except as otherwise limited by law or by resolution of the Board of Directors, the Executive Committee has and may exercise all of the powers and authority of the Board of Directors for the management of the business and affairs of the Company, which power the Executive Committee exercises between the meetings of the full Board of Directors. The Executive Committee met two (2) times in 2017. Members of the Audit Committee are Michael L. Owens, Chairman, William F. Blue, Jr., Charles E. Brock, Walter W. Hubbard, Lowry F. Kline, Hilda S. Murray, and John W. Murrey, III. All of the members of the Audit Committee are “independent directors” as that term is defined by applicable regulations and rules of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (“NASD”). The Audit Committee evaluates audit performance, handles relations with the Company’s independent auditors, and evaluates policies and procedures relating to internal accounting functions and controls. The Audit Committee has the authority to engage the independent accountants for the Company. The Audit Committee operates pursuant to an Audit Committee Charter adopted by the Board of Directors. The Audit Committee has implemented pre-approval policies and procedures related to the provision of audit and non-audit services performed by the independent auditors. Under these procedures, the Audit Committee approves the type of services to be provided and the estimated fees related to those services. The Audit Committee met four (4) times in 2017. Members of the Compensation Committee are Lowry F. Kline, Chairman, William F. Blue, Jr., and Walter W. Hubbard. The Compensation Committee administers the Company’s compensation plans, reviews and may establish the compensation of the Company’s officers, and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning such compensation and related matters. The Compensation Committee acts pursuant to a written Charter adopted by the Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee may request recommendations from the Company’s management concerning the types and levels of compensation to be paid to the Company’s executive officers. Additionally, the Compensation Committee is authorized to engage compensation consultants and may review and consider information and recommendations of compensation consultants otherwise engaged by the Company or the Board of Directors in connection with the assessment, review and structuring of compensation plans and compensation levels. For a description of the Compensation Committee actions with respect to Compensation of Executive Officers in 2017, see Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Compensation for 2017. Annually, the Compensation Committee reviews the performance of the Chief Executive Officer against goals and objectives established by the Committee as part of the process of determining his compensation. The Compensation Committee reports to the Board on its performance review. The Compensation Committee met two (2) times in 2017. The members of the Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee in 2017 were John W. Murrey, III, Chairman, Charles E. Brock, and Hilda S. Murray. The Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee develops and recommends for board approval corporate governance guidelines. The Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee’s Charter includes the duties of a nominating committee. Nominees approved by a majority of the Committee are recommended to the full Board. In selecting and approving director nominees, the Committee considers, among other factors, the existing composition of the Board and the mix of Board members appropriate for the perceived needs of the Company. The Committee believes continuity in leadership and board tenure increase the Board’s ability to exercise meaningful board oversight. Because qualified incumbent directors provide stockholders the benefit of continuity of leadership and seasoned judgment gained through experience as a director of the Company, the Committee will generally give priority as potential candidates to those incumbent directors interested in standing for re-election who have satisfied director performance expectations, including regular attendance at, preparation for and meaningful participation in Board and committee meetings. 11 The Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee also considers the following in selecting the proposed nominee slate: • • • at all times at least a majority of directors must be “independent” in the opinion of the Board as determined in accordance with relevant regulatory and NASD standards; at all times at least three members of the Board must satisfy heightened standards of independence for Audit Committee members; and at all times the Board should have at least one member who satisfies the criteria to be designated by the Board as an “audit committee financial expert”. In selecting the current slate of director nominees, the Committee considered overall qualifications and the requirements of the makeup of the Board of Directors rather than addressing separate topics such as diversity in its selection. The Board considered the value of the incumbents’ familiarity with the Company and its business as well as the considerations outlined above under the heading Considerations with Respect to Nominees. The Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee met one (1) time in 2017. Board Leadership Structure Mr. Daniel K. Frierson currently serves as the Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The positions of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board are combined. Executive sessions of the Board are chaired by the chairman of the Compensation Committee, Lowry F. Kline, who, as noted above, has extensive management and Board experience independent of his experience with the Company. Mr. Kline and the independent directors set their own agenda for meetings in executive session and may consider any topic relevant to the Company and its business. The Company believes that regular, periodic, meetings held in executive session, in the absence of management members or management directors, provide the Board an adequate opportunity to review and address issues affecting management or the Company that require an independent perspective. Additionally, the Company’s Audit Committee holds separate executive sessions with the Company’s independent registered public accounts, internal auditor and management. The Audit Committee also sets its own agenda and may consider any relevant topic in its executive sessions. Director Attendance During 2017, no director attended fewer than 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors and any Committee of the Board of Directors on which he served. All directors are invited and encouraged to attend the annual meeting of shareholders. In general, all directors attend the annual meeting of shareholders unless they are unable to do so due to unavoidable commitments or intervening events. Director Compensation Directors who are employees of the Company do not receive any additional compensation for their services as members of the Board of Directors. Non-employee directors receive an annual retainer of $36,000, payable one-half in cash and one-half in value of Performance Units (subject to a $5.00 per share minimum value for determination of the number of performance units to be issued). Performance Units are redeemable upon a director’s retirement for an equivalent number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock. In addition to the annual retainer, directors who are not employees of the Company receive $1,500 for each Board meeting attended and $1,000 for each committee meeting attended. Chairmen of the Audit and Compensation committees receive an additional annual payment of $8,000 and the Chairmen of the Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee receives an additional annual payment of $4,000. For an additional discussion of Director Compensation, see the tabular information below under the heading, “Director Compensation.” Independent Directors The Board has determined that William F. Blue, Jr., Charles E. Brock, Walter W. Hubbard, Lowry F. Kline, Hilda S. Murray, and Michael L. Owens are independent within the meaning of the standards for independence set forth in the Company’s corporate governance guidelines, which are consistent with the applicable Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules and NASDAQ standards. Executive Sessions of the Independent Directors The Company’s independent directors meet in executive session at each regularly scheduled quarterly meeting of the Board, with the chair of the Compensation Committee serving as chair of such executive sessions. 12 Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and regulations of the SEC thereunder, require the Company’s executive officers and directors and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of the Company’s Common Stock, as well as certain affiliates of such persons, to file initial reports of such ownership and monthly transaction reports covering any changes in such ownership with the SEC and the National Association of Securities Dealers. Executive officers, directors and persons owning more than 10% of the Company’s Common Stock are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company with all such reports they file. Based on its review of the copies of such reports received by it, the Company believes that, during fiscal year 2017, all filing requirements applicable to its executive officers, directors, and owners of more than 10% of the Company's Common Stock have been met. Management Succession Periodically, the Board reviews a succession plan, developed by management, addressing the policies and principles for selecting successors to the Company’s executive officers, including the Company’s CEO. The succession plan includes an assessment of the experience, performance and skills believed to be desirable for possible successors to the Company’s executive officers. Certain Transactions between the Company and Directors and Officers The Company’s Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee has adopted written policies and procedures concerning the review, approval or ratification of all transactions required to be disclosed under the SEC’s Regulation S-K, Rule 404. These policies and procedures cover all related party transactions required to be disclosed under the SEC’s rules as well as all material conflict of interest transactions as defined by relevant state law and the rules and regulations of NASDAQ that are applicable to the Company, and require that all such transactions be identified by management and disclosed to the committee for review. If required and appropriate under the circumstances, the committee will consider such transactions for approval or ratification. Full disclosure of the material terms of any such transaction must be made to the committee, including: • • • the parties to the transaction and their relationship to the Company, its directors and officers; the terms of the transaction, including all proposed periodic payments; and the direct or indirect interest of any related parties or any director, officer or associate in the transaction. To be approved or ratified, the committee must find any such transaction to be fair to the Company. Prior approval of such transactions must be obtained generally, if they are material to the Company. If such transactions are immaterial, such transactions may be ratified and prior approval is not required. Ordinary employment transactions may be ratified. Certain Related Party Transactions During its fiscal year ended December 30, 2017, the Company purchased a portion of its product needs in the form of fiber, yarn, and carpet from Engineered Floors, an entity substantially controlled by Robert E. Shaw, a shareholder of the Company. Mr. Shaw has reported holding approximately 7.4% of the Company’s Common Stock, which, as of year-end, represented approximately 3.5% of the total vote of all classes of the Company’s Common Stock. Engineered Floors is one of several suppliers of such products to the Company. Total purchases from Engineered Floors for 2017 were approximately $7.2 million; or approximately 2.3% of the Company’s cost of goods sold in 2017. In accordance with the terms of its charter, the Compensation Committee reviewed the Company’s supply relationship with Engineered Floors. The dollar value of Mr. Shaw’s interest in the transactions with Engineered Floors is not known to the Company. 13 REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is composed of seven members, each of whom is an independent, non- employee director. The Audit Committee operates under a written Audit Committee Charter adopted and approved by the Board of Directors. The Charter is reviewed at least annually by the Committee. While the Committee has the responsibilities and powers set forth in its written charter, it is not the duty of the Committee to plan or conduct audits. This function is conducted by the Company’s management and its independent registered public accountants. The Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the audited financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 30, 2017 (the “Audited Financial Statements”). In addition, the Committee has discussed with Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP all matters required by applicable auditing standards. The Committee also has received the written report, disclosure and the letter from Dixon Hughes Goodman required by PCAOB Rule 3526, “Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence”, and the Committee has reviewed, evaluated, and discussed with that firm the written report and its independence from the Company. The Committee also has discussed with management of the Company and Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP such other matters and received such assurances from them as the Committee deemed appropriate. Based on the foregoing review and discussions and relying thereon, the Committee has recommended to the Company’s Board of Directors the inclusion of the Company’s Audited Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2017, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. THE AUDIT COMMITTEE Michael L. Owens, Chairman William F. Blue, Jr. Charles E. Brock Walter W. Hubbard Lowry F. Kline Hilda S. Murray John W. Murrey, III AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT The Board has determined that Michael L. Owens, Chairman of the Audit Committee, is an audit committee financial expert as defined by Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is independent within the meaning of Rule 10A-3(b)(l) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. For a brief list of Mr. Owens’ relevant experience, please refer to Mr. Owens’ biographical information as set forth in the Election of Directors section of this proxy statement. Additionally, the Board believes the remaining members of the Audit Committee would qualify as audit committee financial experts, within the meaning of applicable rules, based on each individual's qualification and expertise. 14 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS The Compensation Committee sets compensation for the Company’s executive officers, and its decisions are reported to and reviewed by the Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee currently consists of three independent directors chosen annually by the Board. Compensation of the Company’s executive officers is intended to be competitive with compensation offered by other companies generally similar to the Company in size and lines of business. In determining what types and levels of compensation to offer, the Committee may review relevant, publicly available data and, from time to time, it may receive advice and information from professional compensation consultants. The Elements of Executive Officer Compensation Compensation for each of the Company’s executive officers consists generally of base salary, retirement plan benefits and other customary employment benefits, as well as potential cash incentive awards and stock plan awards pursuant to an annual incentive plan reviewed and adopted by the Committee at the beginning of each year. The annual incentive plan is customarily structured so that a significant portion of each executive’s potential annual compensation may consist of equity awards, the award value of which is tied to accomplishing both financial and non-financial goals and objectives. Compensation for 2017. Effective February 20, 2017, the Compensation Committee selected performance goals and a range of possible incentives for the Company’s 2017 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2017 Plan”). Pursuant to the 2017 Plan, each executive officer had the opportunity to earn a Cash Incentive Award, a Primary Long-Term Incentive Award of restricted stock, and an award of restricted stock denominated as “Career Shares.” The potential range of cash incentives and conditions to vesting of the restricted stock awards are described below. For 2017, each executive officer also received customary retirement plan benefits and other customary employment benefits, as in prior years. Salary for 2017. The base salaries for the executive officers were not adjusted during 2017, except we increased Mr. Hobbs compensation to $250,000 in February 2017. See the 2017 Summary Compensation Table for a tabular presentation of the amount of salary and other compensation elements paid in proportion to total compensation for each named executive officer. Potential Incentive Awards for 2017. The CEO and all executive officers whose responsibilities primarily relate to corporate level administration had the opportunity to earn a cash payment ranging from 15% to no more than 105% of such executive’s base salary (from 45% to 105% for the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer, and from 30% to 90% for the Chief Financial Officer and from 15% to 75% for all other officers). Fifty percent of the amount of the potential award was based on achievement of specified levels of operating income from continuing operations for the Company, as adjusted for unusual items, 30% of the amount was based on achievement of specified levels of operating income of the Company’s residential business operations, as adjusted for unusual items, and 20% of the amount was based on achievement of specified levels of the Company’s commercial business operating income, as adjusted for unusual items. Executive officers whose responsibilities primarily relate to one of the Company’s business units, had the opportunity to earn a cash payment ranging from 15% to no more than 75% of such participant’s base salary. Fifty five percent of the amount was based on achievement of specified levels of their annual business unit operating income, as adjusted for unusual items, 30% was based on the achievement of specified levels of the Company’s consolidated operating income, as adjusted for unusual items, and 15% was based on achievement of specified levels of the annual operating income of the Company’s other business units, as adjusted for unusual items. Primary Long-Term Incentive Share Awards and Career Shares Awards for 2017. The incentive plan provided for two possible awards of restricted stock: Primary Long-Term Incentive Share Awards and Career Share Awards. Receipt of the Primary Long-Term Incentive Share Awards was contingent on the Company’s achievement of minimum levels of adjusted operating income and, in the case of Career Share Awards was contingent on the Company's having a profitable operating income, as adjusted. The Primary Long-Term Incentive Share Award was designed as a possible award of restricted shares, in value equal to no more than 35% of the executive’s base salary as of the beginning of 2017 plus any cash incentive award paid for such year. Any Primary Long-Term Incentive Share Awards, if earned, vest ratably over three years. Career Shares were designed as a possible award of restricted stock valued at 20% of each executive officer’s base salary as of the beginning of the year, excluding the Company’s Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer. The level of career share awards was set at 35% and 30%, respectively, of the Chief Operating Officer’s and Chief Financial Officer’s base salary for 2017. 15 In accordance with past practice, any such award, if earned, would be granted in 2018. For participants age 61 or older, the Career Share Awards vest ratably over two years from the date of the grant. For the participants age 60 or younger, shares vest ratably over five years from the date of grant after the participant reaches age 61. Additionally, all Share Awards are subject to vesting or forfeiture under certain conditions as follows: death, disability or a change in control will result in immediate vesting of all Share Awards; termination without cause will also result in immediate vesting of all Career Share Awards and in immediate vesting of that portion of Long-Term Incentive Share Awards that have been expensed; voluntary termination of employment prior to retirement, or termination for cause will result in forfeiture of all unvested awards; to the extent that the Company has recognized compensation expense related to the shares subject to the awards, such amounts vest at retirement age and are paid out by March 15th of the subsequent year. All awards of restricted stock are subject to a $5.00 minimum price per share when determining the number of shares awarded. The Compensation Committee retained the discretion to reduce any award by up to 30% of the amount otherwise earned based on the participant’s failure to achieve individual performance goals set by the committee. Grant of Special Incentive Options. During 2017, the Compensation Committee authorized the special issuance of incentive stock options structured to vest only upon meeting both a two-year holding period and a performance target related to the price of the Company’s common stock. The two-year holding period began May 30, 2017. The performance target requires that the average high and low share price for the Company’s common stock must be at least $7.00 per share for five consecutive trading days any time during the period beginning on May 30, 2019 and ending on May 30, 2021. The options expire if either the holding period or the performance target are not met. The special options were issued to the Company’s named executive officers and to other employees and key executives. Options issued to the Company’s named executive officers were as follows: Daniel K. Frierson - 40,000 at a strike price of $4.59 per share; D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr. - 25,000 at a strike price of $4.59 per share; Jon Faulkner- 15,000 - at a strike price of $4.17 per share; T. M. Nuckols 15,000 - at a strike price of $4.17 per share; and E. David Hobbs - 15,000- at a strike price of $4.17 per share. 2017 Awards. Cash awards were made to the following named executive officers in 2018 for 2017: Mr. Daniel K. Frierson - $257,656, Mr. D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr. - $125,975, Mr. Jon A. Faulkner - $84,351, Mr. T.M. Nuckols - $123,750, and Mr. E. David Hobbs - $55,000. Primary long-term incentive share awards were granted in 2018 with respect to 2017 for the following named executive officers: Mr. Daniel K. Frierson - 47,575 shares, Mr. D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr. - 24,038 shares, Mr. Jon A. Faulkner - 19,100 shares, Mr. T.M. Nuckols - 21,493 shares, and Mr. E. David Hobbs - 15,362 shares. Career Share Awards were granted in 2018 for 2017 for the following named executive officers: Mr. Daniel K. Frierson - 25,000 shares, Mr D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr. - 22,400 shares, Mr. Jon A. Faulkner - 16,200 shares, Mr. T.M. Nuckols - 11,000 shares, and Mr. E. David Hobbs - 9,200 shares. Incentive Compensation Applicable to 2018. Following year-end, the Committee adopted an incentive plan for 2018 providing for possible cash incentive awards and restricted stock awards in the form of Long-Term Incentive Share Awards and Career Share awards, as in prior years, and similar in structure to the annual plan adopted for 2017, but with a lower initial level of Primary Long Term Incentive Share Awards. Any such awards, if earned, would be paid, in the case of the cash award, or granted, in the case of the restricted stock awards, in March 2019. Retirement Plans and Other Benefits. The Company’s compensation for its executive officers also includes the opportunity to participate in two retirement plans, one qualified and one non-qualified for federal tax purposes, and certain health insurance, life insurance, relocation allowances, and other benefits. Such benefits are designed to be similar to the benefits available to other exempt, salaried associates of the Company, and to be comparable to and competitive with benefits offered by businesses with which the Company competes for executive talent. Executive officers may elect to contribute a limited amount of their compensation to the qualified plan and make deferrals into the non-qualified plan (up to 90% of total compensation). Although the plans permit the Company to make discretionary contributions in an aggregate amount equal to up to 3% of the executive officer’s cash compensation, for 2017 the Company made a contribution of 1% to the qualified plan, while no Company contributions were made to the non-qualified plan. Compensation Considerations for 2017 and 2018. The tax effect of possible forms of compensation on the Company and on the executive officers is a factor considered in determining types of compensation to be awarded. Similarly, the accounting treatment accorded various types of compensation may be an important factor used to determine the form of compensation. The deductibility, for tax purposes, of compensation paid to named executive officers is subject to limits imposed by Section 162 of the Internal Revenue Code. Annual compensation exceeding $1 million was non-deductible unless earned and paid as qualifying “performance based compensation,” under technical rules established by Code section 162(m). The "Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017", eliminated the performance based compensation exception to the non-deductibility rules of section 162. Accordingly, all compensation in excess of $1 million paid to any of the Company's named executive officers (and the Chief Financial Officer) in any given year will be non-deductible. In determining whether to grant otherwise earned awards for 2017 that would be non- deductible, under the new rules, the Committee considered the possible tax effects of any such awards. 16 The Company held a “Say on Pay” vote at its annual meeting in 2017. At that meeting, in excess of 98% of the votes were cast “For” approval of our executive compensation as described in the Proxy Statement for that meeting. The Committee intends to consider these results as part of its ongoing review of executive compensation. Termination Benefits. Upon a Participant's reaching retirement age (as defined in the plan), all Long-Term Incentive Plan and Career Share restricted stock awards vest to the extent such awards have been expensed in the Company’s financial statements. As of year-end, Daniel K. Frierson, and Mr. E. David Hobbs were the only Named Executive Officers eligible for retirement in accordance with the terms of the restricted stock awards. If Mr. Frierson had retired at year end, the number of shares subject to such awards that would have vested and the value of such shares would have been 9,856 shares and $37,945. If Mr. Hobbs had retired at year end, the number of shares subject to such awards that would have vested and the value of such shares would have been 1,518 shares and $5,844. For purposes of valuing the foregoing awards, the Company used the year-end market value of the Company’s Common Stock, which was $3.85/share. Compensation Committee Report The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, set forth above, with management. Based on our review and the discussions we held with management, we have recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’s Proxy Materials. Respectfully submitted, Lowry F. Kline, Chairman William F. Blue, Jr. Walter W. Hubbard 17 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION INFORMATION The following table sets forth information as to all compensation earned during the fiscal years ended December 26, 2015, December 31, 2016 and December 30, 2017 for (i) the Company's Chief Executive Officer; and (ii) the Company's Chief Financial Officer, (iii) the three other most highly compensated executive officers who served as such during the fiscal year ended December 30, 2017 (the “Named Executive Officers”). For a more complete discussion of the elements of executive compensation, this information should be read in conjunction with the other tabular information presented in the balance of this section. Summary Compensation Table Name and Principal Position (a) Year (b) Salary ($) (c)(1) Bonus ($) (d)(2) Stock Awards ($) (e)(3) Option Awards ($) (f) Nonqualified Compensation Earnings ($) (h)(4) All Other Compensation ($) (i)(5) Total ($) (j) Daniel K Frierson Chief Executive Officer D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr. Chief Operating Officer Jon A. Faulkner, Chief Financial Officer T.M. Nuckols, Vice President, President, Dixie Residential E. David Hobbs, Vice President, President, Dixie Commercial 2017 625,000 2016 2015 625,000 625,000 2017 320,000 2016 320,000 2015 320,000 2017 270,000 2016 270,000 2015 270,000 2017 248,958 2016 2015 — — 2017 247,500 2016 203,437 2015 192,500 — 55,748 — — 109,000 — 1,102,427 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 34,842 97,664 108,355 — — — 23,366 70,632 78,363 — — 87,200 23,366 — — — 16,786 18,622 — — 23,366 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5,087 5,479 5,004 4,874 5,479 5,004 4,602 5,389 5,004 685,835 739,479 1,732,431 359,716 423,143 433,359 297,968 346,021 353,367 2,172 361,696 — — — 3,705 3,651 — — 270,866 223,928 214,773 (1) Includes all amounts deferred at the election of the Named Executive Officer. (2) Cash bonuses are shown in the year granted, not earned, because employment through year-end is a condition of earning the award. (3) Amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 for the year presented of stock awards to the Named Executive Officers. (4) The Dixie Group does not provide above-market or preferential earnings on deferred compensation. The Named Executive Officers did not participate in any defined benefit or actuarial pension plans for the periods presented. (5) The following table is a summary and quantification of all amounts included in column (i). 18  All Other Compensation Name (a) Year (b) Registrant Contributions to Defined Contributions Plans ($)(c) Insurance Premiums ($)(d) Other ($)(f) (1&2) Total Perquisites and Other Benefits($)(g) Daniel K. Frierson D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr. Jon A. Faulkner T.M. Nuckols E. David Hobbs 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015 2,208 2,600 2,125 2,208 2,600 2,125 2,208 2,600 2,125 2,034 1,925 1,808 2,879 2,879 2,879 2,666 2,879 2,879 2,394 2,789 2,879 2,172 1,845 1,780 1,793 5,087 5,479 5,004 4,874 5,479 5,004 4,602 5,389 5,004 2,172 — — 3,879 3,705 3,651 50 (1) No named Executive Officer received any tax reimbursement, discounted securities purchases, or payment or accrual on termination plans for the period presented. 19 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1) Name (a) Securities Underlying Options (#) (j) Base Price of Option ($/#) (k) Shares of Stock or Units (#) (i) Grant Date (b) Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($) Daniel K. Frierson 5/30/2017 40,000 $4.59 $55,748 D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr. 5/30/2017 25,000 $4.59 $34,842 Jon A. Faulkner T.M. Nuckols 5/30/2017 15,000 $4.17 $23,366 3/10/2017 20,000 $87,200 5/30/2017 15,000 $4.17 $23,366 E. David Hobbs 5/30/2017 15,000 $4.17 $23,366 (1) The amount set forth in the table reflects the grant date fair value of the award determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. All awards of restricted stock made to the Named Executive Officers under the 2017 Incentive Compensation Plan were granted in 2018, in accordance with the terms of the plan. Such awards are as follows: Name Daniel K. Frierson* D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr.* Jon A. Faulkner T.M. Nuckols E. David Hobbs Long-Term Incentive Award Shares (1) Career Shares (1) Total Shares 47,575 24,038 19,100 21,493 15,362 25,000 22,400 16,200 11,000 9,200 72,575 46,438 35,300 32,493 24,562 *Pursuant to Mr. Daniel K. Frierson's election 36,288 shares of the total of his awards were granted as shares of Class B Common Stock and pursuant to Mr. D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr.'s election, 45,268 shares of the total of his awards were granted as Class B Common Stock. (1) Share awards are subject to a $5.00 minimum valuation per share when determining the amount of shares to be rewarded. 20 Name (a) Daniel K. Frierson D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr. Jon A. Faulkner T.M. Nuckols E. David Hobbs Option Exercises and Stock Vested Option Awards Stock Awards Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)(b) Value Realized on Exercise ($)(c) (1) Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)(d) Value Realized on Vesting ($)(e)(2) — — — — — — — — — — 26,814 92,919 3,469 2,946 — 12,021 10,209 — 2,970 10,292 (1) The value realized is calculated as average of the high and low price on the relevant exercise date minus the option price times the number of acquired shares. (2) The value realized is calculated as the average of the high and low price on the relevant vesting date times the number of vested shares. The following table sets forth information concerning the Company’s Non-Qualified Defined Contribution Plan for each of the Named Executive Officers for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2017. The Company does not maintain any other non-tax qualified deferred compensation plans. There were no withdrawals or distributions by or to the Named Executive Officers in the fiscal year ended 2016. Name (a) Daniel K. Frierson D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr. Jon A. Faulkner T.M. Nuckols E. David Hobbs Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Executive Contribution in Last FY ($) (b)(1)(2) Registrant Contribution in Last FY ($) (c)(1)(2) Aggregate Earnings in Last FY ($) (d)(1)(2)(3) Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($)(e) Aggregate Balance at Last FYE ($) (f) 31,250 19,200 — — 29,700 — — — — — 496,420 113,578 219,885 — 10,566 — — — — — 2,718,643 625,011 1,489,103 — 94,482 (1) For each of the named executive officers, the entire amount reported in this column (b) is included within the amount report in column (c) of the 2017 Summary Compensation Table. (2) None of the amounts reported in this column (d) are reported in column (h) of the 2017 Summary Compensation Table because the Company does not pay guaranteed, above-market or preferential earnings on deferred compensation. (3) Amounts reported in this column (f) for each named executive officer include amounts previously reported in the Company's Summary Compensation Table last year when earned if that officer's compensation was required to be disclosed in the previous year. This total reflects the cumulative value of each named executive officer's deferrals and investment experience. 21 The following table sets forth information concerning outstanding equity awards for each of the Named Executive Officers at fiscal year-end. Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Option Awards Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Option (#)(d) Option Exercise Price ($) (e) Option Expiration Date (f) Stock Awards Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)(i) Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(j) — — — 5.00 4.59 5.00 4.59 5.00 4.17 11/4/2019 112,500 433,125 5/30/2022 11/4/2019 86,892 334,534 5/30/2022 11/4/2019 71,543 275,441 5/30/2022 Name (a) Exercisable( #)(b) Unexercisable (#)(c) Daniel K. Frierson 50,000 D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr. 22,000 Jon A. Faulkner 11,000 — 40,000 — 25,000 — 15,000 T.M. Nuckols — 15,000 — 4.17 5/30/2022 20,000 77,000 E. David Hobbs — 15,000 — 4.17 5/30/2022 1,925 7,411 (1) The market value of the restricted stock set forth in the table has been calculated by multiplying the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock at year-end ($3.85/share) by the number of shares of unvested restricted stock subject to the award. 22 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION Name (a) Fees earned or paid in cash ($) (b)(1) Stock Awards ($) (c)(2) Option Awards ($) (d)(3) All Other Compensation ($) (e)(4) William F. Blue, Jr. 33,500 14,040 Charles E. Brock 30,500 14,040 Walter W. Hubbard 31,500 14,040 Lowry F. Kline 41,500 14,040 Hilda S. Murray 30,500 14,040 John W. Murrey, III 34,500 14,040 Michael L. Owens 37,500 14,040 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total ($) 47,540 44,540 45,540 55,540 44,540 48,540 51,540 (1) Directors who are employees of the Company do not receive any additional compensation for their services as members of the Board of Directors. Non-employee directors receive an annual retainer of $36,000, payable $18,000 in cash and the remainder in Performance Units (subject, for payments made in 2015, 2016 and 2017, to a $5.00 minimum value per unit). For 2017 the value awarded was $14,040 in Performance Units determined as of the date of grant. In addition to the annual retainer, directors who are not employees of the Company received $1,500 for each Board meeting attended and $1,000 for each committee meeting attended. Chairmen of the Audit and Compensation committees receive an additional annual payment of $8,000 and the Chairmen of the Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee receives an additional annual payment of $4,000. Also, directors receive reimbursement of the expenses they incur in attending all board and committee meetings. In addition to the annual retainer, directors who are not employees of the Company receive $1,500 for each Board meeting attended and $1,000 for each committee meeting attended. (2) The value presented is the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The value of the Performance Units awarded to each non-employee director under the Company's 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan was $14,040. 23 At fiscal year-end, each non-employee director was issued the following outstanding equity awards, with respect to service for 2017: Name (a) William F. Blue, Jr. Charles E. Brock Walter W. Hubbard Lowry F. Kline Hilda S. Murray John W. Murrey, III Michael L. Owens Performance Units (#)(b)(1) 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 (1) The performance units represent an equal number of shares of the Company's Common Stock. At year-end, the aggregate value of such stock was $97,020, determined by multiplying the number of performance units issued by the year-end per share market value of the Company's Common Stock ($3.85/share). 24 PROPOSAL TWO ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION As required under recent amendments to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, our stockholders may cast an advisory vote on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, as described in this proxy statement. Our executive compensation programs are designed to attract, motivate, and retain our Named Executive Officers, who are critical to our success. Please read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for additional details about our executive compensation programs, including information about the fiscal 2017 compensation of our Named Executive Officers. We are asking our Shareholders to indicate their approval of our Named Executive Officer compensation as described in this proxy statement. This proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, gives our stockholders the opportunity to express their views on our Named Executive Officers’ compensation. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our Named Executive Officers and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this proxy statement. We recommend that stockholders vote, on an advisory basis, “FOR” the following resolution: “RESOLVED, that the Company’s stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, as discussed and disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the executive compensation tables and related narrative executive compensation disclosure in this proxy statement.” The above resolution will be deemed to be approved if it receives the affirmative vote of a majority of the total votes cast on Proposal Two at the annual meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not considered to be votes cast and, accordingly, will have no effect on the outcome of the vote. As this vote is an advisory vote, the outcome is not binding on us with respect to future executive compensation decisions, including those relating to our named executive officers. Our Board of Directors and our Compensation Committee, however, value the opinions of our stockholders, and to the extent there is any significant vote against the Named Executive Officer compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement, the Compensation Committee will consider our stockholders’ concerns and will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns. The Board of Directors recommends that the Company’s shareholders vote FOR the approval of Proposal Two. ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY SAY-ON-PAY VOTES PROPOSAL THREE Our stockholders also have the opportunity to indicate how frequently we should seek an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers. By voting on Proposal Three, stockholders may indicate whether they would prefer an advisory vote on named executive officer compensation once every one, two, or three years. You will have the opportunity to vote on this issue at least once every six years. Our Board of Directors has determined that an advisory vote on executive compensation that occurs every year is the most appropriate alternative for our company. Accordingly, our Board of Directors recommends that you vote for a one-year interval for the advisory vote on executive compensation. You may cast your vote on your preferred voting frequency by choosing the option of one year, two years, or three years. You may also abstain from voting. The option that receives the highest number of advisory votes by shareholders will be the frequency for the advisory vote on executive compensation deemed to have been selected by stockholders. Abstentions and broker non-votes wil have no effect on the outcome of the vote. As the vote is advisory and not binding, the Board of Directors may decide that it is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation more or less frequently than the option selected by our shareholders (but not less often than once every three years). However, we value the opinions of our shareholders and will consider the outcome of the advisory vote in deciding how often to hold the advisory vote on executive compensation in future years. The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the frequency of the say-on-pay advisory vote to be "one year". 25 PROPOSAL FOUR RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS FOR 2018 The firm of Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP served as independent registered public accountants for the Company for fiscal year 2017. Subject to ratification of its decision by the Company’s shareholders, the Company has selected the firm of Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP to serve as its independent registered public accountants for its 2018 fiscal year. A representative of Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement if he so desires and to respond to appropriate questions from shareholders. The Board of Directors recommends that that the Company’s shareholders vote FOR Proposal Four. In the event that the Company’s shareholders do not ratify the selection of Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP as independent registered public accountants for fiscal 2018, the Board of Directors will consider other alternatives, including appointment of another firm to serve as independent registered public accountants for fiscal 2018. 26 The following table sets forth the fees paid to Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP for services provided during fiscal year 2016 and 2017: AUDIT FEES DISCUSSION Audit fees paid to Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP (1) Audit related fees (2) Tax fees (3) All other fees (4) Total Audit Fees 2017 2016 652,536 $ 23,612 $ 174,975 $ — $ 851,123 $ 663,899 — — 8,187 672,086 $ $ $ $ $ (1) Represents fees for professional services paid to Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP provided in connection with the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements, review of the Company’s quarterly financial statements, review of other SEC filings and technical accounting issues during 2016 and 2017. (2) Represents fees for discussions of recent accounting pronouncements and review of SEC comment letter. (3) Represents fees for tax compliance and tax planning services. (4) Represents fees related to a registration statement. It is the policy of the Audit Committee to pre-approve all services provided by its independent registered public accountants. In addition, the Audit Committee has granted the Chairman of the Audit Committee the power to pre-approve any services that the Committee, as a whole, could approve. None of the fees were approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to the de minimis exception of Reg. S-X T Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C). SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR INCLUSION IN NEXT YEAR'S PROXY STATEMENT In the event any shareholder wishes to present a proposal at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, such proposal must be received by the Company on or before November 17, 2018, to be considered for inclusion in the Company's proxy materials. All shareholder proposals should be addressed to the Company at its principal executive offices, P.O. Box 2007, Dalton, Georgia 30722-2007, Attention: Corporate Secretary, and must comply with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Shareholders who wish to communicate with members of the Board, including the independent directors individually or as a group, may send correspondence to them in care of the Corporate Secretary at the Company’s corporate headquarters, P.O. Box 2007, Dalton, Georgia 30722-2007. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The entire cost of soliciting proxies will be borne by the Company. In addition to solicitation of proxies by mail, proxies may be solicited by the Company’s directors, officers, and other employees by personal interview, telephone, and telegram. The persons making such solicitations will receive no additional compensation for such services. The Company also requests that brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees, and fiduciaries forward solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of the shares of Common Stock held of record by such persons and will pay such brokers and other fiduciaries all of their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection therewith. OTHER MATTERS As of the date of this Proxy Material, the Board does not intend to present, and has not been informed that any other person intends to present, any matter for action at the Annual Meeting other than those specifically referred to herein. If other matters should properly come before the Annual Meeting, it is intended that the holders of the proxies will vote in accordance with their best judgment. Dated: March 23, 2018 The Dixie Group, Inc. Daniel K. Frierson Chairman of the Board 27 DIRECTORS OFFICERS CORPORATE INFORMATION Daniel K. Frierson Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr. Vice President and Chief Operating Officer Jon A. Faulkner Vice President and Chief Financial Officer W. Derek Davis Corporate Secretary and Vice President, Human Resources T.M. Nuckols Vice President and President, Dixie Residential E. David Hobbs Vice President and President, Dixie Commercial Daniel K. Frierson (1) Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, The Dixie Group, Inc. William F. Blue, Jr. (1) (2) (4) Chairman of the Board, The Hopeway Foundation Charles E. Brock (3) (4) President and Chief Executive Officer, Launch Tennessee D. Kennedy Frierson, Jr. Chief Operating Officer, The Dixie Group, Inc. Walter W. Hubbard (2) (4) Retired President and Chief Executive Officer, Honeywell Nylon, Inc. Lowry F. Kline (1) (2) (4) Retired Chairman, Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc. Hilda S. Murray (3) (4) Corporate Secretary and Executive Vice President of TPC Printing & Packaging John W. Murrey, III (3) (4) Retired, Assistant Professor, Appalachian School of Law Michael L. Owens (4) Assistant Dean of Graduate Programs & Lecturer, College of Business, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga (1) Member of Executive Committee (2) Member of Compensation Committee (3) Member of Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee (4) Member of Audit Committee Corporate Office The Dixie Group, Inc. 475 Reed Road Dalton, Georgia 30720 (706) 876-5800 Independent Registered Public Accountants Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP 191 Peachtree Street, NE Suite 2700 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Legal Counsel Miller & Martin PLLC 1000 Volunteer Building 832 Georgia Avenue Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402 Investor Contact Jon A. Faulkner Vice President and Chief Financial Officer The Dixie Group, Inc. 475 Reed Road Dalton, Georgia 30720 (706) 876-5814 Form 10-K and Other Information A copy of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2017, is included with this report. Annual Meeting The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of The Dixie Group, Inc. will be held at 8:00 A.M. EDT on May 2, 2018, at the Corporate Office in Dalton, Georgia. Stock Listing The Dixie Group’s Common Stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol DXYN. Stock Transfer Agent Computershare Investor Services, LLC Post Office Box 30170 College Station, Texas 77845 The Dixie Group maintains a website, www.thedixiegroup.com, where additional information about the Company may be obtained. m o c . s r o n n o c - n a r r u c . w w w / . c n I , s r o n n o C & n a r r u C y b n g i s e D t r o p e R l a u n n A The Dixie Group, Inc. 475 Reed Road Dalton, Georgia 30720 

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above