Annual Report 2014
Dream Office REIT
D
R
E
A
M
O
F
F
I
C
E
R
E
I
T
2
0
1
4
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T
Letter to Unitholders
In 2014, we remained focused on executing
our strategy of improving the quality of
our assets, building strong relationships
with our tenants, and continually
improving the service we provide.
Dream Office REIT finished 2014 strong
and we are off to a solid start for 2015.
Excellent tenant retention and new
leasing momentum in the latter part
of 2014 have resulted in fourth quarter
results that are reflective of the appeal
of the Trust’s portfolio. Tenant retention
was high at 64% and new leasing
activity remained strong, resulting in
quarter-over-quarter positive absorption
and in-place occupancy increasing by
30 basis points in Q4 2014. Our portfolio
continues to perform above the national
average. We are keenly focused on
engaging tenants in renewal discussions
as early as possible, resulting in a
strong head start on 2015 and 2016
leasing. We have already addressed
over half of our 2015 lease expiries, our
strongest pre-leasing performance over
the past five years.
We’re making more improvements
than ever to provide a better tenant
experience. We view proactive investment
in our buildings as a key strategy to
improve tenant retention, attract new
tenants and reduce energy costs. For
2015, we will be investing $75 million on
upgrades and sustainability initiatives,
the largest annual investment ever made
by the REIT.
We plan to further improve the overall
asset quality of our portfolio by
disposing of non-core assets. In the
fourth quarter of 2014, we undertook a
disciplined asset management review
of every building in the portfolio and
identified the assets that are not core
to our business. Our disposition target
for 2015 is $300 million, of which
approximately 50% is currently on the
market. We will use the proceeds of the
dispositions to repurchase units under
our normal course issuer bid or to invest
in higher quality properties.
In the latter part of 2014, oil prices, the
Canadian dollar and interest rates have
declined and provinces are rewriting
their outlook for growth. Across the
country, we feel the impact of these
macro-events to varying degrees. The
pace of activity in the office sector in
Alberta has slowed somewhat, with
tenants, in particular in Calgary and
Edmonton, putting their decision-
making on hold. Fortunately, the
average lease term of our Calgary
and Edmonton portfolios is almost four
years. Additionally, our average tenant
size in each of these markets is small
in comparison to the tenancies of a
majority of other landlords. With our
average tenant size in Calgary and
in Edmonton less than 11,000 square
feet, our exposure is diversified and,
historically, these tenancies have
tended to experience higher retention
and are generally more sensitive to
incurring moving costs. In addition,
these tenancies are not typically the
targeted customer for new buildings
presently under development.
In contrast to a somewhat slower
economy in Alberta, we continue to see
robust activity in both downtown and
suburban Toronto. In our Greater Toronto
Area portfolio, tour activity in January
was up almost 30% over the same time
last year, in part due to our marketing
initiatives as well as greater activity
near the airport including a number of
cross-border tenants expanding due to
a lower Canadian dollar.
We presently estimate our in-place
rents to be approximately 8% below
market rents. Our two largest markets,
downtown Toronto and downtown
Calgary, presently have in-place rents of
10% and 15% below market, respectively,
providing both the opportunity for
growth or a significant buffer, should we
see some softening of rental rates.
While we continue to operate in a
challenging environment, we remain
focused on executing our strategy of
improving the quality of our assets,
building strong relationships with our
tenants, and continually improving
the service we provide. We are seeing
improved tenant retention and some
exciting new leasing. I believe that
the buildings in our portfolio appeal
to tenants and, through the strength
of our platform, we will continue to
outperform the market. In our history,
we’ve never had a better quality
portfolio or a stronger balance sheet
with embedded opportunities for growth
and value creation.
I would like to thank you for your
continued support and look forward to
the upcoming year.
P. Jane Gavan
Chief Executive Officer
March 15, 2015
Portfolio at-a-Glance
DECEMBER 31, 2014
2%
NORTHWEST
TERRITORIES
27%
ALBERTA
5%
BRITISH
COLUMBIA
Dream Office REIT owns and
operates high-quality, well-located
and competitively priced business
premises. The portfolio comprises
approximately 24.2 million square
feet of central business district and
suburban office properties located
in Canada’s key office markets.
5%
SASKATCHEWAN
6%
QUÉBEC
52%
ONTARIO
1%
ATLANTIC
CANADA
2%
UNITED STATES
Geographic Diversification
(% of net operating income)
Photos: 1. Adelaide Place, Toronto | 2. Gallery Building, Yellowknife | 3. Scotia Plaza, Toronto | 4. IBM Corporate Park, Calgary | 5. 13888 Wireless Way, Richmond, BC
1
$7.0B
TOTAL ASSETS
2.9x
INTEREST COVERAGE
RATIO
2
5
7.8%
MARKET RENTS
ABOVE
IN-PLACE RENTS
Diversified, High-Quality Tenants
TENANT
Bank of Nova Scotia
Government of Canada
Government of Ontario
Bell Canada
Government of Québec
Telus
Enbridge Pipelines Inc.
State Street Trust Company
Government of Saskatchewan
Government of British Columbia
OWNED AREA
(%)
4.1
5.9
2.8
1.6
2.7
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.4
1.2
GROSS
RENTAL REVENUE
(%)
7.3
6.1
3.3
1.8
1.7
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.2
WEIGHTED AVERAGE
REMAINING LEASE TERM
(years)
9.7
3.1
4.6
3.3
12.2
2.1
4.1
7.3
2.2
4.6
Adjusted Funds from Operations (“AFFO”)
(per unit)
Net Operating Income Breakdown
(Q4/2014)
$2.60
$2.50
$2.40
$2.30
$2.20
$2.10
$2.00
$1.90
$2.52
28%
SUBURBAN
OFFICE
72%
CENTRAL
BUSINESS
DISTRICT
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
3
4
Payout Ratio
AFFO/Unit
Payout Ratio AFFO/Unit
86.6%
93%
OCCUPANCY
2,200+
TENANTS
5.0
AVERAGE REMAINING
LEASE TERM (years)
47.5%
LEVEL OF DEBT
0.21
0.20
0.19
0.18
0.17
0.16
0.15
Q4-12
Q1-13
2
Table of Contents
Management’s discussion
and analysis
1
Management’s
responsibility for the
consolidated
financial statements
Independent auditor’s
report
Consolidated financial
statements
79
80
81
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
85
Trustees
IBC
Corporate information
IBC
1
3
4
Photos:
1. Barclay Centre, Calgary
2. 55 King Street West, Kitchener
3. 700 de la Gauchetière, Montréal
4. 720 Bay Street, Toronto
Management’s
discussion
and
analysis
(All
dollar
amounts
in
our
tables
are
presented
in
thousands,
except
for
rental
rates,
unit
and
per
unit
amounts)
SECTION
I
–
FINANCIAL
HIGHLIGHTS
AND
OBJECTIVES
FINANCIAL
OVERVIEW
Total
adjusted
funds
from
operations
(“AFFO”)
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
was
$273.1
million,
an
increase
of
$11.3
million,
or
4.3%,
over
the
prior
year
(AFFO
for
the
quarter
was
$68.6
million,
an
increase
of
$1.6
million,
or
2.4%,
over
the
prior
year
comparative
quarter).
AFFO
on
a
per
unit
basis
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
increased
to
$2.52
from
$2.47
over
the
prior
year,
an
increase
of
2.0%
(AFFO
on
a
per
unit
basis
for
the
quarter
increased
to
$0.63
from
$0.62
over
the
prior
year
comparative
quarter,
an
increase
of
1.6%).
Total
funds
from
operations
(“FFO”)
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
was
$312.8
million,
an
increase
of
$6.6
million,
or
2.1%,
over
the
prior
year
(FFO
for
the
quarter
was
$78.1
million,
a
marginal
decline
of
$0.1
million,
or
0.1%,
over
the
prior
year
comparative
quarter).
Diluted
FFO
on
a
per
unit
basis
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
remained
flat
at
$2.87
when
compared
to
the
prior
year
(diluted
FFO
on
a
per
unit
basis
decreased
to
$0.71
from
$0.72
over
the
prior
year
comparative
quarter).
The
increase
in
basic
AFFO
per
unit
over
the
prior
year
and
prior
year
comparative
quarter
resulted
from:
•
0.5%
and
0.7%
growth
in
comparative
properties
net
operating
income
(“NOI”)
over
the
prior
year
and
prior
year
comparative
quarter,
respectively;
Incremental
increase
in
AFFO
from
our
investment
in
Dream
Industrial
REIT;
•
• A
full
year
of
NOI
from
accretive
acquisitions
completed
in
2013;
and
•
Interest
rate
savings
upon
refinancing
of
maturing
debt;
Offset
by:
• Dispositions
completed
during
2014.
The
decrease
in
diluted
FFO
per
unit
over
the
prior
year
comparative
quarter
primarily
resulted
from
the
favourable
points
noted
above,
offset
by
the
write-‐off
of
straight-‐line
rent
due
to
early
lease
terminations
during
2014
and
dispositions
completed
during
2014.
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
NOI
from
comparative
properties
increased
over
the
prior
year
by
$2.2
million,
or
0.5%
(NOI
from
comparative
properties
increased
by
$0.7
million,
or
0.7%,
over
the
prior
year
comparative
quarter).
The
increase
was
mainly
driven
by
higher
rental
rates
achieved
on
new
leasing
completed
during
the
quarter
and
over
the
past
year,
and
the
benefit
of
step
rents,
offset
by
lower
occupancy
on
an
overall
basis.
NOI
from
comparative
properties
decreased
over
the
prior
quarter
by
$0.3
million,
or
0.2%,
mainly
due
to
a
tenant
in
Calgary
downtown
that
vacated
approximately
100,000
square
feet
during
the
previous
quarter.
As
at
December
31,
2014,
overall
in-‐place
occupancy
is
up
30
basis
points
(“bps”)
to
91.4%,
when
compared
to
the
prior
quarter.
This
is
mainly
driven
by
our
largest
market,
Toronto
downtown,
with
a
90
bps
increase,
Eastern
Canada
with
a
70
bps
increase,
and
occupancy
gains
in
all
other
regions,
except
for
Calgary
downtown
and
Toronto
suburban.
As
at
December
31,
2014,
overall
occupancy,
including
future
commitments
on
vacant
space,
remained
unchanged
at
93.0%,
with
all
regions
remaining
steady
with
the
exception
of
Calgary
suburban,
which
experienced
a
200
bps
increase
while
Calgary
downtown
declined
by
140
bps.
When
compared
to
the
prior
year,
overall
occupancy
and
in-‐place
occupancy,
including
future
commitments
on
vacant
space,
were
down
130
bps
over
the
prior
year.
There
were
declines
in
all
regions,
with
the
exception
of
Toronto
downtown,
which
is
our
largest
market
and
had
posted
a
50
bps
increase,
as
well
as
Calgary
suburban
and
Eastern
Canada,
where
occupancy
increased
250
bps
and
70
bps,
respectively.
Despite
the
overall
decline
in
occupancy
when
compared
to
the
prior
year,
the
Trust
is
still
well
above
the
industry
average
of
89.3%
(CBRE,
Canadian
Market
Statistics,
Fourth
Quarter
2014).
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
1
Average
in-‐place
net
rents
continue
to
increase
in
most
regions
across
our
portfolio
as
we
bring
rents
to
market
upon
lease
renewal.
We
ended
the
quarter
with
an
average
in-‐place
net
rent
of
$18.22
per
square
foot,
representing
a
$0.39
per
square
foot,
or
2.2%,
increase
over
Q4
2013
and
$0.01
per
square
foot,
or
0.1%,
increase
over
Q3
2014.
Estimated
average
market
rents
remain
approximately
8%
above
average
in-‐place
net
rents.
We
ended
another
quarter
with
continuing
stable
debt
metrics.
Our
net
debt-‐to-‐gross
book
value
ratio
remained
low
at
47.5%.
Our
weighted
average
face
rate
of
interest
was
4.18%,
our
interest
coverage
ratio
remained
solid
at
2.9
times,
our
net
average
debt-‐to-‐EBITDFV
was
at
7.8
years
and
our
pool
of
unencumbered
assets
remains
at
approximately
$796
million.
During
the
quarter,
we
refinanced
the
Adelaide
Place
mortgage
for
$200
million
at
a
fixed
face
rate
of
3.59%
per
annum
for
a
ten-‐year
term.
During
the
year,
the
Trust
purchased
for
cancellation
832,200
REIT
A
Units
under
the
normal
course
issuer
bid
at
an
average
price
of
$25.14
per
unit
(excluding
transaction
costs)
and
a
total
cost
of
approximately
$20.9
million.
Subsequent
to
year-‐end,
the
Trust
purchased
an
additional
835,000
REIT
A
Units
at
an
average
price
of
$26.76
per
unit
and
a
total
cost
of
approximately
$22.3
million.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
2
KEY
PERFORMANCE
INDICATORS
Performance
is
measured
by
these
and
other
key
indicators:
Portfolio
Number
of
properties
Gross
leasable
area
(“GLA”)(1)
Occupancy
rate
–
including
committed
(period-‐end)(2)
Occupancy
rate
–
in-‐place
(period-‐end)(2)
Average
in-‐place
net
rent
per
square
foot
(period-‐end)(2)
Market
rent/average
in-‐place
net
rent
(%)
December
31,
September
30,
December
31,
2014
2014
2013
As
at
177
24,223
93.0%
91.4%
18.22
7.8%
$
177
24,219
93.0%
91.1%
18.21
8.2%
$
186
24,562
94.3%
92.7%
17.83
8.9%
$
Operating
results
Investment
properties
revenue(3)
NOI(4)
Comparative
properties
NOI(4)
FFO(5)
AFFO(6)
Distributions
Declared
distributions
DRIP
participation
ratio
(for
the
period)
Per
unit
amounts(7)
Distribution
rate
Basic:
FFO(5)
AFFO(6)
Diluted:
FFO(5)
Payout
ratio
(%):
FFO
(basic)
AFFO
(basic)
Three
months
ended
December
31,
Year
ended
December
31,
2014
2013
2014
2013
$
$
205,186
114,164
105,815
78,149
68,570
$
208,418
114,873
105,119
78,242
66,984
$
817,995
458,844
423,937
312,829
273,060
800,531
447,387
421,742
306,247
261,776
$
62,622
29%
$
59,989
24%
$
242,220
26%
$
235,751
21%
$
0.56
$
0.56
$
2.24
$
0.72
0.63
0.71
78%
89%
0.72
0.62
0.72
78%
90%
2.88
2.52
2.87
78%
89%
2.23
2.88
2.47
2.87
77%
90%
As
at
December
31,
September
30,
December
31,
2014
2014
2013
Financing
Weighted
average
effective
interest
rate
on
debt
(year-‐end)
Weighted
average
face
rate
of
interest
on
debt
(year-‐end)
Interest
coverage
ratio
(times)(8)
Net
average
debt-‐to-‐EBITDFV
(years)(8)
Net
debt-‐to-‐adjusted
EBITDFV
(years)(8)
Level
of
debt
(net
debt-‐to-‐gross
book
value)(8)
Level
of
debt
(net
secured
debt-‐to-‐gross
book
value)(8)
Debt
–
average
term
to
maturity
(years)
Unencumbered
assets
Unsecured
convertible
and
non-‐convertible
debentures
(1) In
thousands
of
square
feet
and
excludes
redevelopment
properties
and
assets
held
for
sale.
(2) Includes
investments
in
joint
ventures
and
excludes
redevelopment
properties
and
assets
held
for
sale.
(3) On
a
non-‐GAAP
basis
as
revenue
includes
investments
in
joint
ventures.
$
$
4.15%
4.18%
2.9
7.8
7.9
47.5%
40.4%
4.4
796,000
$
533,860
$
4.20%
4.21%
2.9
7.8
7.8
46.9%
39.9%
4.2
794,000
533,795
$
$
4.18%
4.22%
2.9
8.0
8.0
47.6%
42.5%
4.6
622,000
385,532
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
3
(4) NOI
(non-‐GAAP
measure)
is
defined
as
total
of
net
rental
income,
including
the
share
of
net
rental
income
from
investment
in
joint
ventures
and
property
management
income,
excluding
net
rental
income
from
properties
sold
and
assets
held
for
sale.
The
reconciliation
of
NOI
to
net
rental
income
can
be
found
in
the
section
“Our
results
of
operations”
under
the
heading
“Net
operating
income”.
(5) FFO
(non-‐GAAP
measure)
–
The
reconciliation
of
FFO
to
net
income
can
be
found
in
the
section
“Our
results
of
operations”
under
the
heading
“Funds
from
operations
and
adjusted
funds
from
operations”.
(6) AFFO
(non-‐GAAP
measure)
–
The
reconciliation
of
AFFO
to
cash
flow
from
operations
can
be
found
in
the
section
“Non-‐GAAP
measures
and
other
disclosures”
under
the
heading
“Cash
generated
from
operating
activities
to
AFFO”.
(7) A
description
of
the
determination
of
basic
and
diluted
amounts
per
unit
can
be
found
in
the
section
“Non-‐GAAP
measures
and
other
disclosures”
under
the
heading
“Weighted
average
number
of
units”.
(8) The
calculation
of
the
following
non-‐GAAP
measures
–
interest
coverage
ratio,
net
average
debt-‐to-‐EBITDFV,
net
debt-‐to-‐adjusted
EBITDFV
and
levels
of
debt
–
are
included
in
the
section
“Non-‐GAAP
measures
and
other
disclosures”.
BASIS
OF
PRESENTATION
Our
discussion
and
analysis
of
the
financial
position
and
results
of
operations
of
Dream
Office
Real
Estate
Investment
Trust
(“Dream
Office
REIT”
or
the
“Trust”),
formerly
known
as
Dundee
REIT,
should
be
read
in
conjunction
with
the
audited
consolidated
financial
statements
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014.
Unless
otherwise
indicated,
our
discussion
of
assets,
liabilities,
revenue
and
expenses
includes
our
investment
in
joint
ventures,
which
are
equity
accounted
at
our
proportionate
share
of
assets,
liabilities,
revenue
and
expenses.
This
management’s
discussion
and
analysis
(“MD&A”)
is
dated
as
at
February
19,
2015.
For
simplicity,
throughout
this
discussion
we
may
make
reference
to
the
following:
•
•
•
•
“REIT
A
Units”,
meaning
the
REIT
Units,
Series
A
“REIT
B
Units”,
meaning
the
REIT
Units,
Series
B
“REIT
Units”,
meaning
the
REIT
Units,
Series
A,
and
REIT
Units,
Series
B
“LP
B
Units”
and
“subsidiary
redeemable
units”,
meaning
the
LP
Class
B
Units,
Series
1,
limited
partnership
units
of
Dream
Office
LP
(formerly
known
as
Dundee
Properties
Limited
Partnership)
Certain
market
information
has
been
obtained
from
CBRE,
Canadian
Market
Statistics,
Fourth
Quarter
2014,
a
publication
prepared
by
a
commercial
firm
that
provides
information
relating
to
the
real
estate
industry.
Although
we
believe
this
information
is
reliable,
its
accuracy
and
completeness
is
not
guaranteed.
We
have
not
independently
verified
this
information
and
make
no
representation
as
to
its
accuracy.
When
we
use
terms
such
as
“we”,
“us”
and
“our”,
we
are
referring
to
the
Dream
Office
REIT
and
its
subsidiaries.
Market
rents
disclosed
throughout
the
MD&A
are
management’s
estimates
and
are
based
on
current
period
leasing
fundamentals.
The
current
estimated
market
rents
are
at
a
point
in
time
and
are
subject
to
change
based
on
future
market
conditions.
In
addition,
certain
disclosure
incorporated
by
reference
into
this
report
includes
information
regarding
our
largest
tenants
that
has
been
obtained
from
publicly
available
information.
We
have
not
independently
verified
any
such
information.
Certain
information
herein
contains
or
incorporates
comments
that
constitute
forward-‐looking
information
within
the
meaning
of
applicable
securities
legislation.
Forward-‐looking
information
is
based
on
a
number
of
assumptions
and
is
subject
to
a
number
of
risks
and
uncertainties,
many
of
which
are
beyond
Dream
Office
REIT’s
control,
which
could
cause
actual
results
to
differ
materially
from
those
disclosed
in
or
implied
by
such
forward-‐looking
information.
These
risks
and
uncertainties
include,
but
are
not
limited
to,
general
and
local
economic
and
business
conditions;
the
financial
condition
of
tenants;
our
ability
to
refinance
maturing
debt;
leasing
risks,
including
those
associated
with
the
ability
to
lease
vacant
space;
our
ability
to
source
and
complete
accretive
acquisitions;
and
interest
rates.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
4
Although
the
forward-‐looking
statements
contained
in
this
MD&A
are
based
on
what
we
believe
are
reasonable
assumptions,
there
can
be
no
assurance
that
actual
results
will
be
consistent
with
these
forward-‐looking
statements.
Forward-‐looking
information
is
disclosed
in
this
MD&A
as
part
of
Our
Results
of
Operations
under
the
heading
“Adjusted
funds
from
operations”.
Factors
that
could
cause
actual
results
to
differ
materially
from
those
set
forth
in
the
forward-‐looking
statements
and
information
include,
but
are
not
limited
to,
general
economic
conditions;
local
real
estate
conditions,
including
the
development
of
properties
in
close
proximity
to
the
Trust’s
properties;
timely
leasing
of
vacant
space
and
re-‐leasing
of
occupied
space
upon
expiration;
dependence
on
tenants’
financial
condition;
the
uncertainties
of
acquisition
activity;
the
ability
to
effectively
integrate
acquisitions;
interest
rates;
availability
of
equity
and
debt
financing;
our
continued
compliance
with
the
real
estate
investment
trust
(“REIT”)
exception
under
the
specified
investment
flow-‐through
trust
(“SIFT”)
legislation;
and
other
risks
and
factors
described
from
time
to
time
in
the
documents
filed
by
the
Trust
with
securities
regulators.
All
forward-‐looking
information
is
as
of
February
19,
2015.
Dream
Office
REIT
does
not
undertake
to
update
any
such
forward-‐
looking
information
whether
as
a
result
of
new
information,
future
events
or
otherwise,
except
as
required
by
applicable
law.
Additional
information
about
these
assumptions,
risks
and
uncertainties
is
contained
in
our
filings
with
securities
regulators,
including
our
latest
Annual
Information
Form.
Certain
filings
are
also
available
on
our
website
at
www.dreamofficereit.ca.
OUR
OBJECTIVES
We
are
committed
to:
• Managing
our
business
to
provide
stable
and
growing
cash
flows
and
sustainable
returns,
through
adapting
our
strategy
and
tactics
to
changes
in
the
real
estate
industry
and
the
economy;
• Building
and
maintaining
a
diversified,
growth-‐oriented
portfolio
of
office
properties
in
Canada,
based
on
an
established
platform;
Providing
predictable
and
sustainable
cash
distributions
to
unitholders
and
prudently
managing
distributions
over
time;
and
•
• Maintaining
a
REIT
status
that
satisfies
the
REIT
exception
under
the
SIFT
legislation
in
order
to
provide
certainty
to
unitholders
with
respect
to
taxation
of
distributions.
Distributions
For
the
three
months
ended
December
31,
2014,
approximately
29%
of
our
total
units
were
enrolled
in
the
Distribution
Reinvestment
and
Unit
Purchase
Plan
(“DRIP”).
There
is
no
equivalent
program
for
the
REIT
B
Units
(for
a
description
of
distributions,
refer
to
the
section
“Our
Equity”).
Annualized
distribution
rate
Monthly
distribution
rate
Period-‐end
closing
unit
price
Annualized
distribution
yield
on
closing
unit
price
(%)(1)
8.9%
(1) Annualized
distribution
yield
is
calculated
as
the
annualized
distribution
rate
divided
by
period-‐end
closing
unit
price.
$
$
$
7.7%
8.0%
7.6%
7.8%
Q4
2.24
$
0.187
$
25.15
$
Q3
2.24
$
0.187
$
27.96
$
Q2
2.24
$
0.187
$
29.29
$
Q4
2.24
$
0.187
$
28.82
$
2014
Q1
2.24
$
0.187
$
29.06
$
Q3
2.24
$
0.187
$
29.04
$
Q2
2.24
$
0.187
$
32.64
$
2013
Q1
2.20
0.183
36.65
7.7%
6.9%
6.0%
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
5
OUR
STRATEGY
Dream
Office
REIT’s
core
strategy
is
to
invest
in
office
properties
in
key
markets
across
Canada,
providing
a
solid
platform
for
stable
and
growing
cash
flows.
We
are
the
largest
pure-‐play
office
REIT
in
Canada.
The
majority
of
our
portfolio
comprises
central
business
district
office
properties
concentrated
in
nine
of
Canada’s
top
ten
office
markets.
The
execution
of
our
strategy
is
continuously
reviewed,
including
acquisitions
and
dispositions,
our
capital
structure
and
our
analysis
of
current
economic
conditions.
Our
executive
team
is
experienced,
knowledgeable
and
highly
motivated
to
continue
to
increase
the
value
of
our
portfolio
and
provide
stable,
reliable
and
growing
returns
for
our
unitholders.
Dream
Office
REIT’s
methodology
to
execute
its
strategy
and
to
meet
its
objectives
includes:
Investing
in
high-‐quality
office
properties
Dream
Office
REIT
has
an
established
presence
in
key
urban
markets
across
Canada.
Our
portfolio
comprises
high-‐quality
office
properties
that
are
well-‐located
and
attractively
priced
and
produce
consistent
cash
flow.
When
considering
acquisition
opportunities,
we
look
for
quality
tenancies,
strong
occupancy,
the
appeal
of
the
property
to
future
tenants,
how
it
complements
our
existing
portfolio
and
how
we
can
create
additional
value.
Optimizing
the
performance,
value
and
cash
flow
of
our
portfolio
We
manage
our
properties
to
optimize
long-‐term
cash
flow
and
value.
With
a
fully
internalized
property
manager,
we
offer
a
strong
team
of
highly
experienced
real
estate
professionals
who
are
focused
on
achieving
more
from
our
assets.
Occupancy
rates
across
our
portfolio
have
remained
steady
and
strong
for
a
number
of
years
and
have
been
consistently
above
the
national
average.
We
view
this
as
compelling
evidence
of
the
appeal
of
our
properties
and
our
ability
to
meet
and
exceed
tenant
expectations.
Dream
Office
REIT
has
a
proven
ability
to
identify
and
execute
value-‐add
opportunities.
Diversifying
our
portfolio
to
mitigate
risk
Since
the
credit
crisis
in
2009,
we
have
carefully
repositioned
our
portfolio
through
a
significant
number
of
accretive,
high-‐
quality
acquisitions.
In
addition
to
expanding
and
diversifying
our
geographic
footprint
across
the
country,
the
acquisitions
have
served
to
enhance
the
stability
of
our
business,
diversifying
and
strengthening
the
quality
of
our
revenue
stream
and
increasing
cash
flow.
Our
existing
tenant
base
is
well
diversified,
representing
a
number
of
industries
and
different
space
requirements,
and
offers
strong
financial
covenants.
Our
lease
maturity
profile
is
well
staggered
over
the
next
ten
years.
We
will
continue
to
pursue
opportunities
for
growth
but
only
when
it
enhances
our
overall
portfolio,
further
improves
the
sustainability
of
our
distributions,
strengthens
our
tenant
profile
and
mitigates
risk.
We
have
experience
in
each
of
Canada’s
key
markets
and
have
the
flexibility
to
pursue
acquisitions
in
whichever
markets
offer
compelling
investment
opportunities.
Maintaining
and
strengthening
our
conservative
financial
profile
We
have
always
operated
our
business
in
a
disciplined
manner,
with
a
keen
eye
on
financial
analysis
and
balance
sheet
management
to
ensure
that
we
maintain
a
prudent
capital
structure.
We
continue
to
generate
cash
flow
sufficient
to
fund
our
distributions
while
maintaining
a
conservative
debt
ratio
and
staggered
debt
maturities.
Identifying
opportunities
within
our
portfolio
for
intensification
and
alternative
uses
We
look
at
ways
to
generate
additional
revenue
and
value
from
our
existing
buildings
through
intensification
and
alternative
uses,
especially
in
our
downtown
buildings
where
urbanization
allows
for
opportunities
to
increase
revenue
in
both
office
and
retail
space.
Investing
capital
in
our
portfolio
The
current
leasing
environment
is
challenging
and
requires
us
to
look
for
new
ways
to
retain
tenants
and
increase
revenue.
A
key
to
this
strategy
is
investing
capital
in
our
buildings
that
improves
the
value
and
attractiveness
to
tenants
as
well
as
reduces
operating
costs.
By
doing
so,
our
tenants
will
have
a
better
experience
at
our
buildings,
leading
to
improved
tenant
retention,
quicker
leasing
of
available
space
and
realization
of
higher
rental
rates.
Divesting
of
non-‐core
assets
Dream
Office
REIT
has
an
established
presence
in
key
urban
markets
across
Canada.
Our
portfolio
comprises
high-‐quality
office
properties
that
are
well-‐located
and
attractively
priced
and
produce
consistent
cash
flow.
We
continuously
review
our
portfolio
to
identify
opportunities
to
dispose
of
non-‐core
assets,
such
as
those
that
are
special-‐purpose,
peripherally
located
or
in
declining
locations
with
lower
potential
for
long-‐term
income
growth.
Net
proceeds
from
dispositions
could
be
used
to
fund
improvement
initiatives
or
property
acquisitions.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
6
OUR
PROPERTIES
Dream
Office
REIT
provides
high-‐quality,
well-‐located
and
reasonably
priced
business
premises.
Our
portfolio
comprises
central
business
district
and
suburban
office
properties
predominantly
located
in
major
urban
centres
across
Canada
including
Toronto,
Calgary,
Edmonton,
Montréal,
Ottawa
and
Vancouver.
At
December
31,
2014,
our
ownership
interests
included
177
office
properties
(207
buildings)
totalling
approximately
24.3
million
square
feet
of
GLA,
including
24.2
million
square
feet
of
office
properties
and
0.1
million
square
feet
of
redevelopment
properties
and
properties
held
for
sale.
The
occupancy
rate
across
our
office
portfolio
remains
high
at
93.0%
at
December
31,
2014,
well
ahead
of
the
national
industry
average
occupancy
rate
of
89.3%
(CBRE,
Canadian
Market
Statistics,
Fourth
Quarter
2014).
Our
occupancy
rates
include
lease
commitments
for
space
that
is
currently
being
readied
for
occupancy
but
for
which
rent
is
not
yet
being
recognized.
Western
Canada
Calgary
–
downtown
Calgary
–
suburban
Toronto
–
downtown
Toronto
–
suburban
Eastern
Canada(1)
Total(2)
December
31,
2014
September
30,
2014
December
31,
2013
Owned
GLA
(in
thousands
of
sq.
ft.)
Total
4,806
3,146
757
5,400
4,219
5,895
24,223
%
20
13
3
23
17
24
100
Total
4,803
3,147
758
5,400
4,216
5,895
24,219
%
20
13
3
23
17
24
100
Total
5,101
3,147
813
5,399
4,213
5,889
24,562
%
21
13
3
22
17
24
100
(1)
Includes
two
properties
located
in
the
United
States.
(2)
Excludes
redevelopment
properties
and
properties
held
for
sale.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
7
SECTION
II
–
EXECUTING
THE
STRATEGY
OUR
OPERATIONS
The
following
key
performance
indicators
related
to
our
operations
influence
the
cash
generated
from
operating
activities.
Performance
indicators(1)
Occupancy
rate
–
including
committed
Occupancy
rate
–
in
place
Average
in-‐place
net
rental
rates
(per
sq.
ft.)
Tenant
maturity
profile
–
average
term
to
maturity
(years)
(1)
Excludes
redevelopment
properties
and
properties
held
for
sale.
December
31,
2014
93.0%
91.4%
18.22
5.0
$
$
September
30,
2014
93.0%
91.1%
18.21
5.0
$
December
31,
2013
94.3%
92.7%
17.83
5.1
As
at
December
31,
2014,
overall
in-‐place
occupancy
is
up
30
bps
to
91.4%,
when
compared
to
the
prior
quarter,
as
our
largest
market,
Toronto
downtown,
posted
approximately
46,200
square
feet
of
positive
leasing
absorption,
representing
a
90
bps
occupancy
increase,
and
Eastern
Canada
had
41,100
square
feet
of
positive
leasing
absorption,
representing
a
70
bps
increase.
There
were
modest
occupancy
gains
made
in
all
other
regions
except
for
Calgary
downtown
and
Toronto
suburban,
with
26,700
square
feet
and
23,200
square
feet
of
negative
absorption,
respectively.
As
at
December
31,
2014,
overall
occupancy,
including
future
commitments
on
vacant
space,
is
93.0%,
flat
when
compared
to
the
prior
quarter.
All
regions
remained
relatively
flat
with
the
exception
of
Calgary
suburban,
which
experienced
a
200
bps
increase,
while
Calgary
downtown
declined
by
140
bps.
When
compared
to
the
prior
year,
overall
occupancy
and
in-‐place
occupancy,
including
future
commitments
on
vacant
space,
was
down
130
bps
over
the
prior
year
with
declines
in
all
regions
except
for
strong
gains
in
our
largest
market,
Toronto
downtown,
which
posted
a
50
bps
increase,
and
Calgary
suburban
and
Eastern
Canada,
where
occupancy
increased
250
bps
and
70
bps,
respectively.
Despite
the
overall
decline
in
occupancy
when
compared
to
the
prior
year,
the
Trust
is
still
well
above
the
industry
average
of
89.3%
(CBRE,
Canadian
Market
Statistics,
Fourth
Quarter
2014).
(percentage)
2014
2014
2013
2014
2014
2014
2013
Total
properties(1)
December
31,
September
30,
December
31,
Comparative
properties(2)
December
31,
September
30,
Comparative
properties(3)
December
31,
December
31,
Office
Western
Canada
Calgary
–
downtown
Calgary
–
suburban
Toronto
–
downtown
Toronto
–
suburban
Eastern
Canada
Total
occupancy
rate
–
including
91.7
89.5
89.2
97.3
89.5
94.8
91.7
90.9
87.2
97.0
89.8
94.4
committed
93.0
93.0
93.0
95.3
86.7
96.8
93.7
94.1
94.3
91.7
89.5
89.2
97.3
89.5
94.8
93.0
91.7
90.9
87.2
97.0
89.8
94.4
93.0
91.7
89.5
89.2
97.3
89.5
94.8
93.0
93.2
95.3
86.7
96.8
93.7
94.1
94.4
(1) Excludes
redevelopment
properties
and
properties
held
for
sale.
(2) Comparative
properties
include
all
properties
owned
by
the
Trust
at
September
30,
2014,
excluding
redevelopment
properties,
properties
sold
and
properties
held
for
sale.
(3) Comparative
properties
include
all
properties
owned
by
the
Trust
at
December
31,
2013,
excluding
redevelopment
properties,
properties
sold
and
properties
held
for
sale.
The
table
below
details
the
percentage
of
occupied
and
committed
space
for
the
last
eight
quarters
compared
to
the
national
industry
average,
demonstrating
the
strength
and
consistency
of
our
leasing
profile
to
outperform
the
overall
market.
(percentage)
Office(1)
National
industry
average(2)
(1)
Excludes
redevelopment
properties
and
properties
held
for
sale.
Q4
93.0
89.3
Q3
93.0
89.7
Q2
94.1
89.6
2014
Q1
94.2
89.7
Q4
94.3
90.3
Q3
94.6
90.9
Q2
94.9
91.3
2013
Q1
94.7
91.5
(2)
National
industry
average
occupancy
rates
obtained
from
the
CBRE,
Canadian
Market
Statistics
quarterly
reports.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
8
Occupancy
schedule
The
following
table
details
the
change
in
occupancy
(including
committed)
for
the
three
months
and
year
ended
December
31,
2014:
Weighted
Three
months
ended
average
rate
December
31,
2014
in
sq.
ft.(1)
per
sq.
ft.
As
a
%
of
total
GLA(1)
Weighted
Year
ended
average
rate
December
31,
2014
in
sq.
ft.(1)
per
sq.
ft.
Occupancy
(including
committed)
at
beginning
of
period
Vacancy
committed
for
future
leases
Occupancy
in
place
at
beginning
of
period
Occupancy
related
to
disposed
properties
Remeasurements/reclassifications
Occupancy
at
beginning
of
period
–
adjusted
Expiries
Early
terminations
and
bankruptcies
New
leases
Renewals
Occupancy
in
place
–
December
31,
2014
Vacancy
committed
for
future
leases
Occupancy
(including
committed)
–
December
31,
2014
$
(16.68)
(15.60)
17.39
16.60
(1)
Excludes
redevelopment
properties
and
properties
held
for
sale.
22,518,232
(443,547)
22,074,685
-‐
3,178
22,077,863
(819,241)
(13,070)
365,677
527,762
22,138,991
382,470
93.0%
(1.9)%
91.1%
91.1%
(3.4)%
$
(0.1)%
1.6%
2.2%
91.4%
1.6%
(17.74)
(16.53)
18.09
17.93
23,159,804
(386,783)
22,773,021
(321,752)
(21,333)
22,429,936
(2,982,822)
(145,900)
1,248,005
1,589,772
22,138,991
382,470
22,521,461
93.0%
22,521,461
93.0%
As
a
%
of
total
GLA(1)
94.3%
(1.6)%
92.7%
92.6%
(12.3)%
(0.7)%
5.2%
6.6%
91.4%
1.6%
During
the
quarter,
we
experienced
strong
leasing
activity
which
resulted
in
in-‐place
occupancy
increasing
by
30
bps
or
approximately
61,100
square
feet.
The
activity
was
mainly
driven
by
increases
in
Toronto
downtown
and
Eastern
Canada,
which
accounted
for
approximately
46,200
square
feet
and
41,100
square
feet,
respectively.
This
was
offset
with
a
decrease
in
occupancy
in
Calgary
downtown
and
Toronto
suburban
of
26,700
square
feet
and
23,000
square
feet
of
negative
absorption,
respectively.
During
the
quarter,
we
also
had
early
terminations
and
bankruptcies
totalling
13,100
square
feet.
Leasing
activity
included
approximately
527,800
square
feet
of
renewals
and
approximately
365,700
square
feet
of
new
leases,
offset
by
approximately
832,300
square
feet
of
lease
expiries,
early
terminations
and
bankruptcies.
At
December
31,
2014,
vacant
space
committed
for
future
occupancy
was
approximately
382,500
square
feet,
of
which
approximately
376,400
square
feet
will
take
occupancy
in
2015.
Three
months
ended
Year
ended
Tenant
retention
ratio
Expiring
rents
on
renewed
space
(per
sq.
ft.)
Renewal
to
expiring
rent
spread
(per
sq.
ft.)
December
31,
2014
64.4%
15.19
$
1.41
$
December
31,
2014
53.3%
16.57
1.36
$
$
For
the
three
months
ended
December
31,
2014,
we
experienced
a
strong
tenant
retention
ratio
of
over
64%,
with
renewals
completed
at
$16.60
per
square
foot
compared
to
expiring
rents
at
$15.19
per
square
foot,
for
an
increase
of
$1.41
per
square
foot,
or
9.3%.
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
our
tenant
retention
ratio
was
over
50%
and
we
completed
renewals
at
$17.93
per
square
foot
compared
to
expiring
rents
at
$16.57
per
square
foot,
for
an
increase
of
$1.36
per
square
foot,
or
8.2%.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
9
In-‐place
net
rental
rates
Average
in-‐place
net
rents
across
our
total
portfolio
at
December
31,
2014
increased
to
$18.22
per
square
foot
from
$17.83
per
square
foot
at
December
31,
2013,
reflecting
rent
uplifts
in
all
regions
except
for
Calgary
downtown.
Average
in-‐place
net
rents
across
our
total
portfolio
at
December
31,
2014
was
up
slightly
from
$18.21
per
square
foot
at
September
30,
2014,
mainly
driven
by
higher
rents
in
Calgary
suburban
and
Toronto
downtown.
We
estimate
market
rents
with
reference
to
recent
leasing
activity
and
external
market
data.
We
believe
estimated
market
rents
are
approximately
8%
higher
than
our
portfolio
average
in-‐place
net
rents.
December
31,
2014(1)
Market
rent/
Market
rent
average
in-‐place
net
rent
Average
in-‐place
net
rent
September
30,
2014(1)
Market
rent/
December
31,
2013(1)
Market
rent/
Average
in-‐place
Market
net
rent
rent
average
in-‐place
net
rent
Average
in-‐place
net
rent
Market
rent
Total
office
portfolio
(per
square
foot)
Office
Western
Canada
Calgary
–
downtown
Calgary
–
suburban
Toronto
–
downtown
Toronto
–
suburban
Eastern
Canada
Total
(per
sq.
ft.)
(per
sq.
ft.)
(%)
(per
sq.
ft.)
(per
sq.
ft.)
(%)
(per
sq.
ft.)
(per
sq.
ft.)
$
$
19.80
$
21.01
24.41
21.28
17.82
17.18
26.36
23.95
14.53
15.02
13.19
12.68
18.22
$
19.64
6.1
14.7
3.7
10.1
3.4
4.0
7.8
$
$
19.81
$
21.37
16.82
23.84
14.48
12.73
18.21
$
21.08
25.07
18.19
26.10
15.10
13.12
19.70
6.4
17.3
8.1
9.5
4.3
3.1
8.2
$
$
18.65
$
21.81
16.31
23.23
14.42
12.52
17.83
$
20.60
25.65
17.93
25.26
14.79
13.03
19.42
average
in-‐place
net
rent
(%)
10.5
17.6
9.9
8.7
2.6
4.1
8.9
(1)
Excludes
redevelopment
properties
and
properties
held
for
sale.
Market
rent
estimates
for
occupied
space
across
our
total
portfolio
at
December
31,
2014
increased
to
$19.64
per
square
foot
from
$19.42
per
square
foot
in
Q4
2013,
primarily
driven
by
higher
occupancy
in
our
higher
rent
properties.
Market
rent
estimates
for
occupied
space
across
our
total
portfolio
at
December
31,
2014
decreased
$0.06
from
$19.70
per
square
foot
in
Q3
2014,
primarily
as
a
result
of
decreases
in
estimates
noted
in
downtown
Calgary,
where
market
rents
are
still
approximately
15%
above
in-‐place
net
rent.
Leasing
and
tenant
profile
The
average
remaining
lease
term
and
other
portfolio
information
are
detailed
in
the
following
table.
The
portfolio
average
remaining
lease
term
at
December
31,
2014
is
5.0
years
and
is
stable
when
compared
to
September
30,
2014
and
down
slightly
from
5.1
years
at
December
31,
2013,
largely
reflecting
the
impact
of
leases
rolling
off
year-‐over-‐year.
Average
December
31,
2014(1)
Average
Average
Average
remaining
tenant
in-‐place
remaining
lease
term
size
net
rent
lease
term
(years)
3.7
3.8
3.8
5.8
3.9
6.7
5.0
(sq.
ft.)
10,266
$
10,857
7,067
10,519
11,071
17,941
11,592
$
(per
sq.
ft.)
19.80
21.28
17.18
23.95
14.53
12.68
18.22
(years)
3.7
3.6
3.5
5.9
3.9
6.9
5.0
September
30,
2014(1)
Average
Average
tenant
size
in-‐place
net
rent
(sq.
ft.)
10,238
$
10,965
7,187
10,537
11,006
17,871
11,593
$
(per
sq.
ft.)
19.81
21.37
16.82
23.84
14.48
12.73
18.21
Average
remaining
lease
term
(years)
3.8
3.8
3.9
6.3
3.8
7.0
5.1
December
31,
2013(1)
Average
Average
tenant
size
in-‐place
net
rent
(sq.
ft.)
10,043
$
11,243
6,410
10,491
11,192
17,541
11,461
$
(per
sq.
ft.)
18.65
21.81
16.31
23.23
14.42
12.52
17.83
Western
Canada
Calgary
–
downtown
Calgary
–
suburban
Toronto
–
downtown
Toronto
–
suburban
Eastern
Canada
Total
(1)
Excludes
redevelopment
properties
and
properties
held
for
sale.
The
following
table
details
our
lease
maturity
profile
by
geographic
segment
at
December
31,
2014.
The
table
distinguishes
between
lease
maturities
that
have
yet
to
be
renewed
or
re-‐leased
and
maturities
for
which
we
have
a
leasing
commitment.
The
“Expiries,
net
of
committed
occupancy”
line
in
the
respective
regions
should
be
referenced
when
considering
future
leasing
risks
or
opportunities,
and
the
“Vacancy
committed
for
new
leases”
line
in
the
respective
regions
should
be
referenced
when
considering
the
impact
of
leasing
activity.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
10
Our
lease
maturity
profile
remains
staggered.
Lease
expiries
(net
of
committed
occupancy)
as
a
percentage
of
total
in-‐place
occupancy
are
8%
for
2015,
13%
for
2016,
18%
for
2017,
13%
for
2018
and
10%
for
2019.
(in
square
feet)
Western
Canada
Expiries(1)
Expiries
committed
for
occupancy(2)
Current
monthly/
short-‐term
tenancies
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020+
Total
(1,184)
(553,281)
(875,441)
(807,274)
(794,162)
(513,974)
(1,163,316)
(4,708,632)
-‐
195,948
91,553
3,096
9,431
-‐
-‐
300,028
Expiries,
net
of
committed
renewals
(1,184)
(357,333)
(783,888)
(804,178)
(784,731)
(513,974)
(1,163,316)
(4,408,604)
Vacancies
committed
for
new
leases
Expiries,
net
of
commitments
obtained
Calgary
downtown
Expiries(1)
Expiries
committed
for
occupancy(2)
Expiries,
net
of
committed
renewals
Vacancies
committed
for
new
leases
Expiries,
net
of
commitments
obtained
Calgary
suburban
Expiries(1)
Expiries
committed
for
occupancy(2)
Expiries,
net
of
committed
renewals
Vacancies
committed
for
new
leases
Expiries,
net
of
commitments
obtained
Toronto
downtown
Expiries(1)
Expiries
committed
for
occupancy(2)
-‐
64,208
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
64,208
(1,184)
(293,125)
(783,888)
(804,178)
(784,731)
(513,974)
(1,163,316)
(4,344,396)
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
(354,202)
(779,775)
(382,935)
(422,095)
(627,265)
(604,293)
(3,170,565)
113,508
188,947
43,047
8,270
-‐
-‐
353,772
(240,694)
(590,828)
(339,888)
(413,825)
(627,265)
(604,293)
(2,816,793)
28,615
-‐
4,104
-‐
-‐
-‐
32,719
(212,079)
(590,828)
(335,784)
(413,825)
(627,265)
(604,293)
(2,784,074)
(78,824)
(111,291)
(172,348)
(143,317)
(49,776)
(214,371)
(769,927)
17,715
2,717
73,947
-‐
-‐
-‐
94,379
(61,109)
(108,574)
(98,401)
(143,317)
(49,776)
(214,371)
(675,548)
23,374
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
23,374
(37,735)
(108,574)
(98,401)
(143,317)
(49,776)
(214,371)
(652,174)
(2,496)
(548,111)
(812,289)
(908,716)
(652,279)
(323,002)
(2,547,125)
(5,794,018)
-‐
281,513
205,069
11,953
16,420
-‐
24,813
539,768
Expiries,
net
of
committed
renewals
(2,496)
(266,598)
(607,220)
(896,763)
(635,859)
(323,002)
(2,522,312)
(5,254,250)
Vacancies
committed
for
new
leases
Expiries,
net
of
commitments
obtained
Toronto
suburban
Expiries(1)
Expiries
committed
for
occupancy(2)
-‐
40,887
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
40,887
(2,496)
(225,711)
(607,220)
(896,763)
(635,859)
(323,002)
(2,522,312)
(5,213,363)
(674)
(615,134)
(815,225)
(957,559)
(352,643)
(295,514)
(1,248,968)
(4,285,717)
-‐
100,419
410,147
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
510,566
Expiries,
net
of
committed
renewals
(674)
(514,715)
(405,078)
(957,559)
(352,643)
(295,514)
(1,248,968)
(3,775,151)
Vacancies
committed
for
new
leases
Expiries,
net
of
commitments
obtained
Eastern
Canada
Expiries(1)
Expiries
committed
for
occupancy(2)
Expiries,
net
of
committed
renewals
Vacancies
committed
for
new
leases
Expiries,
net
of
committed
occupancy
Total
portfolio
Expiries(1)
Expiries
committed
for
occupancy(2)
-‐
102,078
1,194
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
103,272
(674)
(412,637)
(403,884)
(957,559)
(352,643)
(295,514)
(1,248,968)
(3,671,879)
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
(498,344)
(518,719)
(832,701)
(719,158)
(340,812)
(3,153,115)
(6,062,849)
205,304
98,542
1,094
166,794
-‐
-‐
471,734
(293,040)
(420,177)
(831,607)
(552,364)
(340,812)
(3,153,115)
(5,591,115)
117,210
800
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
118,010
(175,830)
(419,377)
(831,607)
(552,364)
(340,812)
(3,153,115)
(5,473,105)
(4,354)
(2,647,896)
(3,912,740)
(4,061,533)
(3,083,654)
(2,150,343)
(8,931,188)
(24,791,708)
-‐
914,407
996,975
133,137
200,915
-‐
24,813
2,270,247
Expiries,
net
of
committed
renewals
(4,354)
(1,733,489)
(2,915,765)
(3,928,396)
(2,882,739)
(2,150,343)
(8,906,375)
(22,521,461)
Vacancies
committed
for
new
leases
-‐
376,372
1,994
4,104
-‐
-‐
-‐
382,470
Expiries,
net
of
committed
occupancy
(1)
Expiries
includes
current
in-‐place
expiries
and
future
expiries
committed
for
renewals.
(1,357,117)
(2,913,771)
(4,354)
(3,924,292)
(2)
Expiries
committed
for
occupancy
includes
renewals,
new
leasing
and
relocation
of
tenants.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
11
(2,882,739)
(2,150,343)
(8,906,375)
(22,138,991)
The
following
table
details
expiring
rents
across
our
portfolio
as
well
as
our
own
estimate
of
average
market
rents
based
on
current
leasing
activity
in
similar
properties
at
December
31,
2014.
Expiring
rents
and
market
rents
represent
base
rents
and
do
not
include
the
impact
of
lease
incentives.
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
$
$
$
$
$
17.68
21.21
13.82
21.65
17.15
16.37
18.82
17.65
14.91
20.62
22.10
13.22
15.01
16.30
Expiring
rents
Western
Canada
Calgary
–
downtown
Calgary
–
suburban
Toronto
–
downtown
Toronto
–
suburban
Eastern
Canada
Portfolio
average
Market
rents(1)
Western
Canada
Calgary
–
downtown
Calgary
–
suburban
Toronto
–
downtown
Toronto
–
suburban
Eastern
Canada
Market
rent
average
%
below
expiring
rent
(1)
Estimate
only;
based
on
current
market
rents
with
no
allowance
for
increases
in
future
years.
Subject
to
changes
based
on
market
conditions.
21.51
26.92
19.54
22.09
14.96
16.07
20.47
2.9%
18.25
26.69
16.49
24.05
17.35
14.21
20.39
8.3%
20.09
23.36
15.86
25.28
14.72
14.76
19.01
1.8%
18.97
21.59
19.42
25.45
13.56
13.57
17.83
9.4%
21.31
22.17
16.45
22.54
15.09
14.89
18.67
18.39
25.07
20.24
24.23
15.35
15.99
19.90
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
20.64
24.47
19.13
24.50
13.00
13.60
20.14
19.74
24.25
17.35
23.80
13.24
13.36
19.70
(2.2)%
Initial
direct
leasing
costs
and
lease
incentives
Initial
direct
leasing
costs
include
leasing
fees
and
related
costs
and
broker
commissions
incurred
in
negotiating
and
arranging
tenant
leases.
Lease
incentives
include
costs
incurred
to
make
leasehold
improvements
to
tenant
spaces
and
cash
allowances.
Initial
direct
leasing
costs
and
lease
incentives
are
dependent
upon
asset
type,
lease
terminations
and
expiries,
the
mix
of
new
leasing
activity
compared
to
renewals,
portfolio
growth
and
general
market
conditions.
Short-‐term
leases
generally
have
lower
costs
than
long-‐term
leases,
and
leasing
costs
associated
with
office
space
are
generally
higher
than
costs
associated
with
flex
office
and
industrial
space.
For
the
three
and
twelve
months
ended
December
31,
2014,
approximately
$14.6
million
and
$41.6
million,
respectively,
of
leasing
costs
and
lease
incentives
were
attributable
to
leases
that
commenced
during
the
periods,
representing
an
average
cost
of
$16.31
per
square
foot
and
$14.66
per
square
foot,
respectively.
Average
initial
direct
leasing
costs
and
lease
incentives
for
the
quarter
increased
to
$16.31
per
square
foot
from
$15.66
per
square
foot
for
the
previous
quarter,
mainly
due
to
certain
higher
quality
tenants
that
took
occupancy
of
space
during
the
quarter
with
longer
than
average
lease
terms
and
higher
lease
incentives.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
12
Performance
indicators
Operating
activities
(continuing
portfolio)(1)
Portfolio
size
(sq.
ft.)
Occupied
and
committed
occupancy
Number
of
lease
deals
committed
Leases
that
commenced
during
the
period
(sq.
ft.)
Average
lease
term
for
leases
that
commenced
during
the
period
(years)
Initial
direct
leasing
costs
and
lease
incentives
attributable
to
leases
that
commenced
during
the
period
(in
thousands)
Initial
direct
leasing
costs
and
lease
incentives
attributable
to
leases
that
commenced
during
the
period
(per
sq.
ft.)
(1)
Excludes
redevelopment
properties
and
properties
held
for
sale.
Three
months
ended
Year
ended
December
31,
2014
December
31,
2014
24,222,661
93.0%
167
893,439
5.1
24,222,661
93.0%
573
2,837,777
5.4
$
$
14,561
$
41,582
16.31
$
14.66
Tenant
base
profile
Our
tenant
base
includes
municipal,
provincial
and
federal
governments
as
well
as
a
wide
range
of
high-‐quality
large
international
corporations,
including
Canada’s
major
banks
and
three
of
Canada’s
prominent
law
firms,
and
small
to
medium-‐
sized
businesses
across
Canada.
With
over
2,200
tenants,
our
risk
of
exposure
to
any
single
large
lease
or
tenant
is
mitigated.
The
average
size
of
our
office
tenants
is
approximately
11,600
square
feet.
Effectively
managing
this
diverse
tenant
base
is
one
of
our
key
strengths
and
has
helped
us
to
maintain
consistently
high
occupancy
levels
and
to
continually
capitalize
on
rental
rate
increases.
The
stability
and
quality
of
our
cash
flow
is
further
enhanced
by
the
fact
that
rental
revenue
from
government
and
government
agencies
comprises
approximately
17.5%
of
our
total
rental
revenue.
The
list
of
our
20
largest
tenants
includes
both
federal
and
provincial
governments
as
well
as
other
nationally
and
internationally
recognizable
high-‐quality
corporations
and
businesses.
The
following
table
outlines
their
contributions
to
our
total
rental
revenue.
Owned
area
Owned
area
revenue
remaining
lease
term
Gross
rental
Weighted
average
Tenant
Bank
of
Nova
Scotia
Government
of
Canada
Government
of
Ontario
Bell
Canada
Government
of
Québec
Telus
Enbridge
Pipelines
Inc.
State
Street
Trust
Company
Government
of
Saskatchewan
Government
of
British
Columbia
Government
of
Alberta
Newalta
Corporation
Aviva
Canada
Inc.
Borell
Management
Loyalty
Management
SNC-‐Lavalin
Inc.
Miller
Thomson
Government
of
NW
Territories
Cenovus
Energy
Winners
Merchants
International
Total
(1)
Credit
ratings
obtained
from
Standard
&
Poorʼs
and
may
reflect
the
parentʼs
or
a
guarantorʼs
credit
rating.
(sq.
ft.)
984,404
1,423,259
670,003
376,694
663,922
287,803
248,577
244,936
343,001
287,747
304,079
187,297
335,900
124,795
194,018
207,351
137,149
142,202
140,605
219,685
7,523,427
(%)
4.1
5.9
2.8
1.6
2.7
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.4
1.2
1.3
0.8
1.4
0.5
0.8
0.9
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.9
31.3
(%)
7.3
6.1
3.3
1.8
1.7
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.0
1.0
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
36.5
N/A
–
not
applicable
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
13
(years)
9.7
3.1
4.6
3.3
12.2
2.1
4.1
7.3
2.2
4.6
3.0
4.8
3.1
2.0
2.8
5.4
8.7
6.9
8.5
1.2
5.3
Credit
rating(1)
A+/A-‐/A-‐1
AAA
AA-‐/A-‐1+
BBB+
A+/A-‐1+
BBB+
A-‐/A-‐1
AA-‐/A+/A-‐1+
AAA/A-‐1+
AAA/A-‐1+
AAA/A-‐1+
N/A
A+
N/A
N/A
BBB
N/A
N/A
A-‐1/BBB+
N/A
OUR
RESOURCES
AND
FINANCIAL
CONDITION
Investment
properties
As
at
December
31,
2014,
the
value
of
our
investment
property
comparative
portfolio,
which
includes
investment
in
joint
ventures
and
excludes
redevelopment
properties,
properties
sold
and
assets
held
for
sale,
was
$7,192
million
(September
30,
2014
–
$7,226
million;
December
31,
2013
–
$7,238
million).
Fair
values
were
determined
using
the
direct
capitalization
method.
The
direct
capitalization
method
applies
a
capitalization
rate
(“cap
rate”)
to
stabilized
NOI
(non-‐GAAP
measure)
and
incorporates
allowances
for
vacancy
and
management
fees.
The
resulting
capitalized
value
is
further
adjusted
for
non-‐recurring
costs
to
stabilize
income
and
non-‐recoverable
capital
expenditures,
where
applicable.
Individual
properties
across
our
comparative
portfolio
were
valued
using
weighted
average
cap
rates
in
the
range
of
5.15%
to
8.75%
as
at
December
31,
2014.
The
fair
value
of
our
investment
properties,
including
investment
in
joint
ventures,
is
set
out
below:
Western
Canada
Calgary
–
downtown
Calgary
–
suburban
Toronto
–
downtown
Toronto
–
suburban
Eastern
Canada
Total
comparative
portfolio(1)
Add:
Redevelopment
properties
Assets
held
for
sale/sold
properties
Total
portfolio
Less:
Investment
in
joint
ventures
Assets
held
for
sale
–
joint
ventures
Total
per
consolidated
balance
sheets
(1)
Comparative
figures
have
been
reclassified
to
exclude
sold
properties.
December
31,
2014
1,395,943
1,162,981
183,969
2,409,667
962,942
1,076,344
7,191,846
10,000
2,750
7,204,596
1,062,776
2,750
6,139,070
$
$
$
$
September
30,
2014(1)
1,412,491
1,193,046
184,830
2,398,996
961,250
1,075,837
7,226,450
10,000
2,750
7,239,200
1,062,212
2,750
6,174,238
$
$
$
$
$
Total
portfolio
December
31,
2013(1)
1,445,127
1,203,684
183,927
2,365,230
967,882
1,072,085
7,237,935
10,000
75,667
7,323,602
1,061,436
20,481
6,241,685
The
carrying
value
of
our
total
portfolio
decreased
by
approximately
$34.6
million
during
the
quarter,
mainly
due
to
a
$67.3
million
decrease
in
fair
value,
offset
by
$32.2
million
of
building
improvements,
initial
direct
leasing
costs
and
lease
incentive
additions,
and
$0.5
million
related
to
the
amortization
of
lease
incentives,
foreign
exchange
and
other
adjustments.
The
$67.3
million
fair
value
loss
recognized
during
the
quarter
was
mainly
driven
by
externally
appraised
properties
in
Western
Canada
and
Calgary,
where
the
external
appraisers
assumed
lowered
market
rents
and
increased
downtimes
in
selected
assets.
Other
factors
which
contributed
to
the
fair
value
decline
included
changes
in
rental
rates
and
leasing
assumptions,
mainly
in
Western
Canada
and
Calgary
downtown
properties
with
previously
identified
future
tenant
vacancies.
The
weighted
average
cap
rate
across
our
total
comparative
portfolio
compressed
by
2
bps
to
6.16%
when
compared
to
September
30,
2014
and
December
31,
2013.
The
overall
decrease
in
cap
rates
was
mainly
experienced
in
Toronto
downtown
and
Eastern
Canada,
offset
by
modest
increases
in
the
other
regions.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
14
Changes
in
the
value
of
our
investment
properties
by
region
for
the
three
months
ended
December
31,
2014
are
summarized
in
the
table
below
as
follows:
Initial
direct
leasing
costs
Amortization
of
lease
incentives,
foreign
exchange
Three
months
ended
Building
and
lease
Fair
value
and
other
December
31,
improvements
incentives
adjustments
adjustments
3,123
$
2,340
569
3,711
1,617
2,807
14,167
-‐
-‐
14,167
$
2,849
$
4,667
296
3,236
3,483
3,450
17,981
-‐
15
17,996
$
(22,000)
$
(36,300)
(1,600)
4,200
(2,900)
(8,700)
(67,300)
-‐
-‐
(67,300)
$
(520)
$
(772)
(126)
(476)
(508)
2,950
548
2014
1,395,943
1,162,981
183,969
2,409,667
962,942
1,076,344
7,191,846
-‐
(15)
533
$
10,000
2,750
7,204,596
$
September
30,
2014(1)
1,412,491
$
1,193,046
184,830
2,398,996
961,250
1,075,837
7,226,450
10,000
2,750
7,239,200
$
$
1,062,212
2,750
459
-‐
345
6
(200)
-‐
(40)
(6)
1,062,776
2,750
Western
Canada
Calgary
–
downtown
Calgary
–
suburban
Toronto
–
downtown
Toronto
–
suburban
Eastern
Canada
Total
comparative
portfolio(1)
Add:
Redevelopment
properties
Assets
held
for
sale/sold
properties
Total
portfolio
Less:
Investment
in
joint
ventures
Assets
held
for
sale
Total
investment
properties
(per
consolidated
balance
sheet)
6,174,238
$
(1)
Opening
balances
have
been
reclassified
to
exclude
sold
properties.
$
13,708
$
17,645
$
(67,100)
$
579
$
6,139,070
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
15
Changes
in
the
value
of
our
investment
properties
by
region
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
are
summarized
in
the
table
below
as
follows:
Initial
direct
leasing
costs
Amortization
of
lease
incentives,
foreign
exchange
Year
ended
Property
Building
and
lease
Fair
value
and
other
December
31,
dispositions
improvements
incentives
adjustments
7,118
$
8,194
930
6,841
3,484
7,346
33,913
6,071
$
9,491
1,202
10,233
11,008
10,127
48,132
(60,444)
$
(55,247)
(1,595)
28,868
(17,579)
(20,206)
(126,203)
adjustments
2014
(1,929)
$
1,395,943
1,162,981
(3,141)
183,969
(495)
2,409,667
(1,505)
962,942
(1,853)
1,076,344
6,992
7,191,846
(1,931)
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
10,000
$
Western
Canada
Calgary
–
downtown
Calgary
–
suburban
Toronto
–
downtown
Toronto
–
suburban
Eastern
Canada
Total
comparative
portfolio(1)
Add:
Redevelopment
properties
Assets
held
for
sale/sold
January
1,
2014(1)
1,445,127
$
1,203,684
183,927
2,365,230
967,882
1,072,085
7,237,935
10,000
-‐
$
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
properties
Total
portfolio
Less:
Investment
in
joint
ventures
Assets
held
for
sale
Total
investment
properties
(per
consolidated
balance
75,667
7,323,602
$
(71,780)
(71,780)
$
$
45
33,958
$
1,110
49,242
$
(2,253)
(128,456)
$
(39)
2,750
(1,970)
$
7,204,596
1,061,436
20,481
-‐
(17,833)
3,934
45
1,154
674
(3,596)
(557)
(152)
(60)
1,062,776
2,750
$
sheet)
(1)
Opening
balances
have
been
reclassified
to
exclude
sold
properties.
6,241,685
$
(53,947)
$
29,979
$
47,414
$
(124,303)
$
(1,758)
$
6,139,070
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
16
Cap
rates
are
a
key
metric
used
to
value
our
investment
properties,
and
are
set
out
in
the
table
below
by
region:
December
31,
2014
September
30,
2014(1)
Capitalization
rates
Total
portfolio
December
31,
2013(1)
Western
Canada
Calgary
–
downtown
Calgary
–
suburban
Toronto
–
downtown
Toronto
–
suburban
Eastern
Canada
Total
before
redevelopment
properties
and
assets
held
for
sale/sold
properties
Range
(%)
5.75–8.75
5.50–7.50
6.25–7.25
5.15–7.00
5.75–7.50
5.75–8.50
5.15–8.75
Redevelopment
properties
Assets
held
for
sale/sold
properties
Total
portfolio
(1)
Comparative
figures
have
been
reclassified
to
exclude
sold
properties.
N/A
–
not
applicable
N/A
N/A
5.15–9.00
Investing
activities
Our
investing
activities
are
summarized
as
follows:
Investing
activities(1)
Acquisition
of
investment
properties(2)
Building
improvements
(1)
Includes
investments
in
joint
ventures
and
properties
held
for
sale.
$
(2)
Amount
represents
purchase
price
including
transaction
costs.
Weighted
average
(%)
6.66
6.16
6.81
5.42
6.55
6.72
6.16
9.00
8.00
6.17
Range
(%)
5.75–8.75
5.50–7.50
6.25–7.25
5.15–7.00
5.75–7.50
5.75–9.00
5.15–9.00
N/A
N/A
5.15–9.00
Weighted
average
(%)
6.63
6.16
6.81
5.43
6.55
6.80
6.18
9.00
8.00
6.18
Range
(%)
5.75–8.75
5.50–7.50
6.25–7.25
5.15–7.00
5.75–7.25
6.00–9.00
5.15–9.00
N/A
6.25–8.00
5.15–9.00
Weighted
average
(%)
6.56
6.13
6.78
5.53
6.46
6.77
6.18
9.00
6.92
6.19
Three
months
ended
December
31,
Year
ended
December
31,
2014
2013
2014
2013
-‐
14,167
$
8,481
$
11,737
-‐
33,958
$
604,931
36,229
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
17
Acquisitions
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
there
were
no
acquisitions
completed.
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013,
the
following
acquisitions
were
completed:
Broadmoor
Plaza,
Edmonton
887
Great
Northern
Way,
Vancouver
(Discovery
Parks)
Interest
Acquired
Occupancy
acquired
GLA
on
acquisition
Property
type
office
(%)
100.0
(sq.
ft.)
371,561
(%)
98.5
$
Purchase
price(1)
84,892
Date
acquired
March
15,
2013
office
100.0
164,364
100.0
68,068
April
8,
2013
340–350
3rd
Avenue
North,
Saskatoon
(T&T
Towers)
and
14505–14555
Bannister
Road,
Calgary
(Parke
at
Fish
Creek)
20
Toronto
Street
and
137
Yonge
Street,
Toronto
212
King
Street
West,
Toronto
100
Yonge
Street,
Toronto
IBM
Corporate
Park,
Calgary
4561
Parliament
Avenue,
Regina
(Harbour
Landing
Business
Park)
83
Yonge
Street,
Toronto
Total
(1)
Includes
$14.7
million
in
transaction
costs.
office
office
office
office
office
100.0
100.0
100.0
66.7
66.7
191,147
422,990
73,277
161,525
238,171
99.1
99.4
100.0
99.4
98.1
62,610
145,983
38,730
56,273
124,377
April
12,
2013
April
30,
2013
May
24,
2013
June
26,
2013
August
13,
2013
office
office
100.0
100.0
38,975
11,521
1,673,531
100.0
71.2
98.9
$
15,517
8,481
604,931
September
16,
2013
December
2,
2013
Building
improvements
Building
improvements
represent
investments
made
to
ensure
optimal
building
performance.
For
the
three
and
twelve
months
ended
December
31,
2014,
we
incurred
$14.2
million
and
$34.0
million,
respectively,
in
expenditures
related
to
building
improvements,
substantially
all
of
which
are
recoverable
from
tenants.
Recurring
recoverable
building
improvements
for
the
three
and
twelve
months
ended
December
31,
2014
were
$6.9
million
and
$13.3
million,
respectively,
and
included
elevator,
roof
and
heating,
ventilation
and
air
conditioning
replacements
as
well
as
parking
upgrades.
Recurring
recoverable
enhancement
projects
include
lobby
and
common
area
upgrades
and
exterior
enhancements.
For
the
three
and
twelve
months
ended
December
31,
2014,
recurring
recoverable
enhancement
projects
were
$4.6
million
and
$11.1
million,
respectively.
For
the
three
and
twelve
months
ended
December
31,
2014,
approximately
$1.1
million
and
$1.8
million,
respectively,
were
spent
on
sustainability
and
environmental
initiatives,
substantially
all
of
which
are
recovered
from
tenants.
Non-‐recurring
building
improvements
included
capital
expenditures
that
generally
would
not
be
expected
to
recur
over
the
useful
life
of
the
building.
The
table
below
represents
amounts
either
paid
or
accrued
during
the
period:
Building
improvements(1)
Recurring
recoverable
Recurring
recoverable
enhancement
projects
Sustainability
and
environmental
initiatives
Recoverable
–
identified
upon
acquisition
Recurring
non-‐recoverable
Non-‐recurring
and
non-‐recoverable
Total
Three
months
ended
December
31,
2013
2014
Year
ended
December
31,
2014
2013
$
$
6,912
4,558
1,120
866
654
57
14,167
$
$
2,429
8,088
906
202
78
34
11,737
$
$
13,286
11,056
1,760
5,402
1,182
1,272
33,958
$
$
10,190
14,023
4,124
6,005
1,344
543
36,229
(1)
Includes
investment
in
joint
ventures
that
are
equity
accounted
and
properties
held
for
sale.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
18
Dispositions
Pursuant
to
our
strategy
of
divesting
non-‐core
assets,
we
completed
the
following
dispositions
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014:
Riverbend
Atrium,
Calgary(3)
Stockman
Centre,
Calgary(3)
Plaza
124,
Edmonton(3)
9705
Horton
Road,
Calgary
26229
Township
Road
531,
Edmonton(4)
11404
Winterburn
Rd
NW,
Edmonton(4)
16134
-‐
114th
Avenue
NW,
Edmonton(4)
16104
-‐
114th
Avenue
NW,
Edmonton(4)
St.
Albert
Trail
Centre,
Edmonton
Total
Disposed
Property
Ownership
GLA
type
(%)
(sq.
ft.)
Gross
proceeds(1)
Carrying
value
Cost
of
sales(2)
Loss
Mortgages
on
sale
discharged
Date
disposed
office
25%
22,055
$
4,850
$
5,009
$
89
$
(248)
$
1,173
June
3,
2014
office
office
25%
25%
15,656
38,590
3,375
9,275
3,324
9,601
63
172
(12)
(498)
577
3,569
June
3,
2014
June
3,
2014
office
100%
55,363
9,150
9,022
301
(173)
5,919
June
12,
2014
flex
100%
89,165
12,084
12,144
8
(68)
5,529
September
9,
2014
flex
100%
81,917
10,489
10,489
24
(24)
5,599
September
9,
2014
flex
100%
48,353
3,938
3,938
44
(44)
2,651
September
9,
2014
flex
100%
28,759
6,281
6,281
5
(5)
2,030
September
9,
2014
office
50%
48,402
428,260
$
12,073
12,075
71,517
$
71,881
$
426
(424)
1,132
$
(1,496)
$
6,389
33,436
September
15,
2014
(1) Gross
proceeds
before
transaction
costs.
(2) Cost
of
sales
includes
mainly
the
write-‐off
of
financing
costs
and
fair
value
adjustments
associated
with
the
debt
discharged,
transaction
costs
and
the
write-‐off
of
goodwill
associated
with
the
cash-‐generating
unit.
(3) The
Trust
held
a
25%
interest
in
the
property
through
a
partnership
interest
and
accounted
for
this
as
a
joint
venture.
(4) These
investment
properties
were
sold
to
Dream
Industrial
REIT.
On
September
9,
2014,
the
Trust
completed
the
sale
of
four
investment
properties
to
Dream
Industrial
REIT
for
a
sale
price
of
$33
million,
net
of
mark-‐to-‐market
adjustments
on
mortgages
assumed
by
Dream
Industrial
REIT.
The
sale
price
was
satisfied
by
receipt
of
2,269,759
Class
B
limited
partnership
units
of
Dream
Industrial
LP
(a
subsidiary
of
Dream
Industrial
REIT)
at
$9.40
per
unit,
which
are
exchangeable
for
units
of
Dream
Industrial
REIT,
offset
by
mortgages
assumed
on
disposition.
We
completed
the
following
dispositions
of
non-‐core
assets
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013:
Disposed
625
University
Park
Drive,
Regina
2640,
2510–2550
Quance
Street,
Regina
Total
(1) Gross
proceeds
before
transaction
costs.
(2) Loss
on
sales
includes
mainly
the
write-‐off
of
financing
costs
and
fair
value
adjustments
associated
with
the
debt
discharged,
transaction
costs
and
the
$
$
$
$
$
$
Property
type
office
office
GLA
(sq.
ft.)
17,145
69,554
86,699
Gross
proceeds(1)
5,182
16,300
21,482
Loss
on
sale(2)
(68)
(215)
(283)
Mortgages
discharged
-‐
8,767
8,767
Date
disposed
January
31,
2013
January
31,
2013
write-‐off
of
goodwill
associated
with
the
cash-‐generating
unit.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
19
OUR
FINANCING
Liquidity
and
capital
resources
Dream
Office
REIT’s
primary
sources
of
capital
are
cash
generated
from
operating
activities,
credit
facilities,
mortgage
financing
and
refinancing,
and
equity
and
debt
issuances.
Our
primary
uses
of
capital
include
the
payment
of
distributions,
costs
of
attracting
and
retaining
tenants,
recurring
property
maintenance,
major
property
improvements,
debt
principal
repayments,
interest
payments
and
property
acquisitions.
We
expect
to
meet
all
of
our
ongoing
obligations
with
current
cash
and
cash
equivalents,
cash
flows
generated
from
operations,
credit
facilities,
conventional
mortgage
refinancing
and,
as
growth
requires
and
when
appropriate,
new
equity
or
debt
issuances.
In
our
consolidated
financial
statements,
our
current
liabilities
exceeded
our
current
assets
by
$424.3
million.
Typically,
real
estate
entities
seek
to
address
liquidity
needs
by
having
a
balanced
debt
maturity
schedule,
undrawn
credit
facilities,
and
a
pool
of
unencumbered
assets.
We
are
able
to
use
our
credit
facilities
on
short
notice
which
eliminates
the
need
to
hold
significant
amounts
of
cash
and
cash
equivalents
on
hand.
Working
capital
balances
fluctuate
significantly
from
period
to
period
depending
on
the
timing
of
receipts
and
payments.
Debt
obligations
that
are
due
within
one
year
include
debt
maturities
of
$365.9
million
(excluding
debt
related
to
investment
in
joint
ventures
which
are
equity
accounted),
which
we
typically
refinance
with
mortgages
and
debt
issuances
of
terms
between
five
and
ten
years.
Amounts
payable
balance
outstanding
at
the
end
of
any
reporting
period
depends
primarily
on
the
timing
of
leasing
costs,
capital
expenditures
incurred,
as
well
as
the
impact
of
transaction
costs
incurred
on
any
acquisitions
completed
during
the
reporting
period.
Our
unencumbered
assets
pool
as
at
December
31,
2014
is
approximately
$796
million.
We
endeavour
to
maintain
high
levels
of
liquidity
to
ensure
that
we
can
meet
distribution
requirements
and
react
quickly
to
potential
investment
opportunities.
Our
discussion
of
financing
activities
will
be
based
on
the
debt
balances,
which
include
debt
related
to
investment
in
joint
ventures
that
are
equity
accounted,
at
our
proportionate
ownership,
and
debt
associated
with
assets
held
for
sale.
Debt
Less
debt
related
to:
Investment
in
joint
ventures
Assets
held
for
sale
Debt
(per
consolidated
financial
statements)
December
31,
September
30,
December
31,
2014
2014
$
3,594,341
$
3,567,775
$
496,980
-‐
502,100
-‐
$
3,097,361
$
3,065,675
$
2013
3,662,543
508,088
5,439
3,149,016
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
20
A
summary
of
debt
The
key
performance
indicators
in
the
management
of
our
debt
are
as
follows:
December
31,
2014
September
30,
December
31,
2014
2013
Financing
and
liquidity
metrics
Weighted
average
effective
interest
rate
(year-‐end)(1)
Weighted
average
face
rate
of
interest
(year-‐end)(2)
Interest
coverage
ratio
(times)(3)
Net
average
debt-‐to-‐EBITDFV
(years)(3)
Net
debt-‐to-‐adjusted
EBITDFV
(years)(3)
Level
of
debt
(net
debt-‐to-‐gross
book
value)(3)
Level
of
debt
(net
secured
debt-‐to-‐gross
book
value)(3)
Secured
debt
to
total
investment
properties(4)
Debt
–
average
term
to
maturity
(years)
Variable
rate
debt
as
percentage
of
total
debt
Secured
debt
Unsecured
convertible
and
non-‐convertible
debentures
Unencumbered
assets
Cash
and
cash
equivalents
on
hand
Undrawn
demand
revolving
credit
facilities
(1) Weighted
average
effective
interest
rate
is
calculated
as
the
weighted
average
face
rate
of
interest
net
of
amortization
of
fair
value
adjustments
and
4.15%
4.18%
2.9
7.8
7.9
47.5%
40.4%
42.5%
4.4
7.6%
3,060,481
533,860
796,000
20,889
251,540
4.20%
4.21%
2.9
7.8
7.8
46.9%
39.9%
41.9%
4.2
7.7%
3,033,980
533,795
794,000
13,251
248,508
4.18%
4.22%
2.9
8.0
8.0
47.6%
42.5%
44.7%
4.6
8.7%
3,277,011
385,532
622,000
33,879
161,175
$
$
$
financing
costs
of
all
interest
bearing
debt,
including
debt
related
to
investment
in
joint
ventures,
which
are
equity
accounted.
(2) Weighted
average
face
rate
of
interest
includes
debt
related
to
investment
in
joint
ventures
that
are
equity
accounted.
(3) The
calculation
of
the
following
non-‐GAAP
measures,
interest
coverage
ratio,
net
average
debt-‐to-‐EBITDFV,
net
debt-‐to-‐adjusted
EBITDFV
and
levels
of
debt,
are
included
in
the
“Non-‐GAAP
measures
and
other
disclosures”
section
of
the
MD&A.
(4) Secured
debt
to
total
investment
properties
(non-‐GAAP
measure)
is
calculated
as
secured
debt
divided
by
total
investment
properties.
Management
believes
this
non-‐GAAP
measurement
is
an
important
measure
of
our
secured
debt
levels.
We
currently
use
cash
flow
performance
and
debt
level
indicators
to
assess
our
ability
to
meet
our
financing
obligations.
Our
current
interest
coverage
ratio
is
2.9
times,
demonstrating
our
ability
to
more
than
adequately
cover
interest
expense
requirements.
We
also
monitor
our
debt-‐to-‐EBITDFV
ratio
to
gauge
our
ability
to
repay
existing
debt.
Our
current
net
average
debt-‐to-‐EBITDFV
ratio
is
7.8
years.
Our
weighted
average
face
rate
of
interest
is
4.18%
at
December
31,
2014,
down
3
bps
when
compared
to
September
30,
2014
and
down
4
bps
when
compared
to
December
31,
2013.
After
accounting
for
fair
value
adjustments
and
financing
costs,
the
weighted
average
effective
interest
rate
for
outstanding
debt
is
4.15%
at
December
31,
2014,
down
5
bps
when
compared
to
September
30,
2014
and
down
3
bps
when
compared
to
December
31,
2013.
The
decline
in
both
the
weighted
average
face
rate
and
effective
interest
rates
was
mainly
driven
by
the
interest
savings
from
disposed
properties
during
the
year
and
interest
rate
savings
upon
refinancing
of
maturing
debt.
Financing
activities
during
the
quarter
During
the
quarter,
we
refinanced
the
Adelaide
Place
mortgage
for
$200
million
at
a
fixed
face
rate
of
3.59%
per
annum
for
a
ten-‐year
term,
with
only
interest
payable
for
the
first
five
years.
During
the
quarter,
we
discharged
$151.4
million
of
debt
at
an
average
face
rate
of
4.29%.
The
table
below
summarizes
the
debt
discharged
during
the
three
months
ended
December
31,
2014:
Discharges
Discharged
Discharged
Total
Properties
Adelaide
Place
Airway
Centre
1
and
2–4
Date
discharged
December
18,
2014
December
22,
2014
Amount
143,923
7,500
151,423
$
$
Face
rate
4.28%
4.52%
4.29%
Type
Fixed
Fixed
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
21
Composition
of
debt
As
at
December
31,
2014,
variable
rate
debt
as
a
percentage
of
total
debt
decreased
to
7.6%
from
8.7%
at
December
31,
2013,
primarily
due
to
the
net
repayment
of
one
of
the
demand
revolving
credit
facilities
offset
by
the
expiry
of
the
three-‐year
interest
rate
swap
on
the
notional
balance
of
$53.7
million
during
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014.
Mortgages
Term
debt
Demand
revolving
credit
facilities
Term
loan
facility
Convertible
debentures
Debentures
Total
$
$
Fixed
2,781,344
533
-‐
128,948
51,160
358,144
3,320,129
$
$
Variable
96,344
-‐
-‐
53,312
-‐
124,556
274,212
$
December
31,
2014
Total(1)
2,877,688
533
-‐
182,260
51,160
482,700
3,594,341
$
Fixed
2,901,120
825
-‐
181,530
51,885
209,312
3,344,672
$
$
$
$
92.4%
Percentage
of
total
debt
4.26%
In-‐place
face
rate
(period-‐end)
4.6
Average
term
to
maturity
(1)
Includes
debt
related
to
investment
in
joint
ventures,
which
are
equity
accounted,
and
assets
held
for
sale.
100.0%
4.18%
4.4
7.6%
3.13%
1.8
91.3%
4.33%
4.8
Variable
89,590
-‐
103,946
-‐
-‐
124,335
317,871
8.7%
3.07%
2.0
$
December
31,
2013
Total(1)
2,990,710
825
103,946
181,530
51,885
333,647
3,662,543
$
100.0%
4.22%
4.6
Demand
revolving
credit
facilities
Secured
investment
properties
First-‐
Second-‐
Face
December
31,
2014
December
31,
2013
ranking
ranking
interest
Amount
Amount
Amount
Maturity
date
mortgages
mortgages
rate
available
drawn
available
Amount
drawn
Formula-‐based
maximum
not
to
exceed
$171,500
Formula-‐based
maximum
not
to
exceed
$27,690
Formula-‐based
maximum
March
5,
2016
April
30,
2015
not
to
exceed
$35,000
April
30,
2015
Formula-‐based
maximum
not
to
exceed
$35,000
April
30,
2015
9
2
-‐
1
12
-‐
3.75%(1)
$
171,500
$
-‐
$
67,500
$
104,000
-‐
3.85%(2)
27,247(3)
2
3.75%(1)
34,850(4)
1
3
3.75%(1)
3.76%
$
17,943(5)
251,540
$
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
26,156(3)
32,819(4)
-‐
-‐
34,700(5)
$
161,175
$
-‐
104,000
(1) In
the
form
of
rolling
one-‐month
bankersʼ
acceptances
(“BAs”)
bearing
interest
at
the
BA
rate
plus
1.75%
or
at
the
bankʼs
prime
rate
(3.0%
as
at
December
31,
2014)
plus
0.75%.
(2) This
facility
matured
on
April
30,
2014
and
was
extended
to
April
30,
2015
in
the
form
of
rolling
one-‐month
BAs
bearing
interest
at
BA
rate
plus
1.85%
or
at
the
bankʼs
prime
rate
plus
0.85%.
(3) Formula-‐based
amount
available
under
this
facility
was
$27,690
less
$443
in
the
form
of
a
letter
of
credit
(“LOC”)
as
at
December
31,
2014
and
less
$1,534
(LOC)
as
at
December
31,
2013.
(4) Formula-‐based
amount
available
under
this
facility
was
$35,000
less
$150
in
the
form
of
LOC
as
at
December
31,
2014
and
$35,000
less
$2,181
(LOC)
as
at
December
31,
2013.
(5) Formula-‐based
amount
available
under
this
facility
was
$35,000
less
$17,057
in
the
form
of
LOC
as
at
December
31,
2014
and
$35,000
less
$300
(LOC)
as
at
December
31,
2013.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
22
Changes
in
debt
levels,
including
debt
related
to
investment
in
joint
ventures
that
are
equity
accounted
and
assets
held
for
sale
for
the
three
and
twelve
months
ended
December
31,
2014,
are
as
follows:
Three
months
ended
December
31,
2014
Demand
revolving
credit
Term
loan
Convertible
Mortgages
facilities
facility
$
$
$
Debt
as
at
September
30,
2014
New
debt
placed
Scheduled
repayments
Lump
sum
repayments
Foreign
exchange
Other
adjustments(1)
Debt
as
at
December
31,
2014
(1)
Other
adjustments
include
financing
costs
on
new
debt
placed,
fair
value
adjustments,
amortization
of
financing
costs
and
amortization
of
fair
value
2,851,313
200,000
(22,094)
(151,423)
1,286
(1,394)
482,577
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
123
482,700
182,061
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
199
182,260
51,218
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
(58)
-‐
(26,107)
-‐
26,107
2,877,688
51,160
-‐
-‐
-‐
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Term
debt
606
-‐
(73)
-‐
-‐
-‐
533
debentures
Debentures
$
Total
3,567,775
226,107
(22,167)
(177,530)
1,286
(1,130)
3,594,341
adjustments.
Demand
revolving
credit
Term
loan
Convertible
Year
ended
December
31,
2014
Debt
as
at
December
31,
2013
New
debt
placed
Scheduled
repayments
Lump
sum
repayments
Lump
sum
repayments
related
$
Mortgages
$
2,990,710
231,707
(78,651)
(234,085)
$
Term
debt
825
-‐
(292)
-‐
facilities
facility
$
103,946
78,347
-‐
(182,347)
$
181,530
-‐
-‐
-‐
debentures
Debentures
$
$
51,885
-‐
-‐
-‐
333,647
150,000
-‐
-‐
Total
3,662,543
460,054
(78,943)
(416,432)
to
assets
held
for
sale
(16,389)
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
(16,389)
Debt
assumed
by
purchaser
upon
disposition
of
investment
properties
Conversion
of
debentures
Foreign
exchange
Other
adjustments(1)
Debt
as
at
December
31,
2014
(1)
Other
adjustments
include
financing
costs
on
new
debt
placed,
fair
value
adjustments,
amortization
of
financing
costs
and
amortization
of
fair
value
-‐
-‐
-‐
730
182,260
-‐
-‐
-‐
(947)
$
-‐
(500)
-‐
(225)
$
-‐
4,743
(3,300)
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
533
-‐
-‐
-‐
54
-‐
2,877,688
(17,047)
482,700
51,160
$
$
$
$
$
(17,047)
(500)
4,743
(3,688)
3,594,341
adjustments.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
23
Our
current
debt
profile
is
balanced
with
staggered
maturities
over
the
next
14
years.
The
following
tables
summarize
our
debt
maturity
profile
as
at
December
31,
2014:
Scheduled
principal
repayments
on
Outstanding
non-‐matured
$
$
$
debt
balance
303,023
567,366
438,014
374,861
426,024
1,096,303
3,205,591
Debt
maturities
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020–2028
Subtotal
before
undernoted
item
Demand
revolving
credit
facilities
2016
Subtotal
Financing
costs
Fair
value
adjustments
Total
(1)
Includes
debt
related
to
investment
in
joint
ventures,
which
are
equity
accounted,
and
assets
held
for
sale.
Amount(1)
377,930
632,786
493,509
424,219
462,300
1,207,552
3,598,296
74,907
65,420
55,495
49,358
36,276
111,249
392,705
-‐
3,598,296
(14,240)
10,285
3,594,341
-‐
3,205,591
-‐
392,705
$
$
$
$
%
10.5%
17.6%
13.7%
11.8%
12.8%
33.6%
100.0%
0.00%
100.0%
Weighted
average
effective
interest
rate
on
balance
due
at
maturity
(%)
3.60%
4.37%
4.18%
4.00%
3.64%
4.44%
4.15%
0.00%
4.15%
Weighted
average
face
rate
on
balance
due
at
maturity
(%)
4.08%
4.40%
4.45%
3.93%
3.33%
4.39%
4.18%
0.00%
4.18%
Term
loan
Convertible
Debt
maturities
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
and
thereafter
$
Mortgages(1)
377,633
$
414,097
317,881
249,219
462,300
1,057,552
2,878,682
(10,317)
9,323
2,877,688
$
Term
debt
297
236
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
533
-‐
-‐
533
$
facility
-‐
183,453
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
183,453
(1,193)
debentures
Debentures
$
$
-‐
-‐
50,628
-‐
-‐
-‐
50,628
-‐
532
51,160
-‐
35,000
125,000
175,000
-‐
150,000
485,000
(2,730)
430
$
482,700
$
Total
377,930
632,786
493,509
424,219
462,300
1,207,552
3,598,296
(14,240)
10,285
$
3,594,341
Financing
costs
Fair
value
adjustments
Total
(1)
Includes
debt
related
to
investment
in
joint
ventures,
which
are
equity
accounted,
and
assets
held
for
sale.
-‐
$
182,260
$
$
Convertible
debentures
The
total
principal
amounts
outstanding
for
the
convertible
debentures
are
as
follows:
5.5%
Series
H
Debentures
Date
issued
Maturity
date
December
9,
2011
March
31,
2017
December
31,
2014
50,628
$
$
February
19,
2015
50,628
$
February
19,
2015
1,379,941
The
fair
value
of
the
conversion
features
of
the
convertible
debentures
is
remeasured
each
period,
with
changes
in
fair
value
being
recorded
in
comprehensive
income.
At
December
31,
2014,
the
conversion
feature
amounted
to
a
$0.8
million
financial
asset
(December
31,
2013
–
$0.3
million
financial
asset).
Outstanding
principal
Outstanding
principal
REIT
A
Units
if
converted
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
24
Debentures
The
total
principal
amounts
outstanding
for
debentures
as
at
December
31,
2014
are
as
follows:
Debentures
Series
A
Series
B
Series
C
Series
K
Series
L
Total
(1)
Variable
interest
rate
at
three-‐month
Canadian
Dealer
Offered
Rate
(“CDOR”)
plus
1.7%.
Date
issued
June
13,
2013
October
9,
2013
January
21,
2014
April
26,
2011
August
8,
2011
Maturity
date
June
13,
2018
January
9,
2017
January
21,
2020
April
26,
2016
September
30,
2016
Type
Fixed
Variable
Fixed
Fixed
Fixed
Interest
rate
3.42%
2.97%(1)
4.07%
5.95%
5.95%
Outstanding
principal
December
31,
2014
175,000
125,000
150,000
25,000
10,000
485,000
$
$
Commitments
and
contingencies
We
are
contingently
liable
with
respect
to
guarantees
that
are
issued
in
the
normal
course
of
business
and
with
respect
to
litigation
and
claims
that
may
arise
from
time
to
time.
In
the
opinion
of
management,
any
liability
that
may
arise
from
such
contingencies
would
not
have
a
material
adverse
effect
on
our
consolidated
financial
statements.
The
Trust
has
entered
into
lease
agreements
that
may
require
tenant
improvement
costs
of
approximately
$26.4
million.
In
an
effort
to
manage
the
volatility
of
electricity
prices
mainly
in
the
Western
Canada
and
Calgary
regions,
the
Trust
entered
into
fixed
price
contracts
to
purchase
electricity
for
60
properties
over
the
next
three
years.
Dream
Office
REIT’s
finance
leases,
fixed
price
contracts
to
purchase
electricity,
and
future
minimum
commitments
under
operating
leases
are
as
follows:
Operating
lease
payments
Finance
lease
payments
Electricity
Total
<
1
year
1,019
28
5,788
6,835
$
$
1–5
years
1,183
35
2,873
4,091
$
$
$
$
Minimum
payments
due
>
5
years
8,288
-‐
-‐
8,288
$
$
Total
10,490
63
8,661
19,214
OUR
EQUITY
Our
discussion
of
equity
includes
LP
B
Units
(or
subsidiary
redeemable
units),
which
are
economically
equivalent
to
REIT
Units.
Pursuant
to
IFRS,
the
LP
B
Units
are
classified
as
a
liability
in
our
consolidated
financial
statements.
REIT
Units,
Series
A
Retained
earnings
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
income
Add:
LP
B
Units
Total
Number
of
Units
107,936,575
-‐
-‐
107,936,575
602,434
108,539,009
$
$
December
31,
2014
Amount
3,171,794
601,495
4,228
3,777,517
15,151
3,792,668
Number
of
Units
103,420,221
-‐
-‐
103,420,221
3,538,457
106,958,678
$
$
Unitholders’
equity
December
31,
2013
Amount
3,039,189
682,265
1,684
3,723,138
101,978
3,825,116
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
25
Our
Declaration
of
Trust
authorizes
the
issuance
of
an
unlimited
number
of
the
following
classes
of
units:
REIT
Units
and
Special
Trust
Units.
The
Special
Trust
Units
may
only
be
issued
to
holders
of
LP
B
Units,
are
not
transferable
separately
from
these
Units,
and
are
used
to
provide
voting
rights
with
respect
to
Dream
Office
REIT
to
persons
holding
LP
B
Units.
The
LP
B
Units
are
held
by
Dream
Unlimited
Corp.,
directly
and
indirectly
through
its
subsidiaries,
related
parties
to
Dream
Office
REIT
and
one
other
holder.
Both
the
REIT
Units
and
Special
Trust
Units
entitle
the
holder
to
one
vote
for
each
Unit
at
all
meetings
of
the
unitholders.
The
LP
B
Units
are
exchangeable
on
a
one-‐for-‐one
basis
for
REIT
B
Units
at
the
option
of
the
holder,
which
can
then
be
converted
into
REIT
A
Units.
The
LP
B
Units
and
corresponding
Special
Trust
Units
together
have
economic
and
voting
rights
equivalent
in
all
material
respects
to
REIT
A
Units.
The
REIT
A
Units
and
REIT
B
Units
have
economic
and
voting
rights
equivalent
in
all
material
respects
to
each
other.
At
December
31,
2014,
Dream
Unlimited
Corp.,
directly
and
indirectly
through
its
subsidiaries,
held
773,939
REIT
A
Units
and
383,823
LP
B
Units
for
a
total
ownership
interest
of
approximately
1.1%.
The
following
table
summarizes
the
changes
in
our
outstanding
equity:
Total
Units
issued
and
outstanding
on
January
1,
2014
Units
issued
pursuant
to
DRIP
Units
issued
pursuant
to
the
Unit
Purchase
Plan
Units
issued
pursuant
to
Deferred
Unit
Incentive
Plan
(“DUIP”)
LP
B
Units
surrendered
and
exchanged
for
REIT
A
Units
Cancellation
of
REIT
A
Units
Conversion
of
Series
H
Debentures
Total
Units
outstanding
on
December
31,
2014
Percentage
of
all
Units
Units
issued
pursuant
to
DRIP
on
January
15,
2015
Units
issued
pursuant
to
DRIP
on
February
15,
2015
Units
issued
pursuant
to
Unit
Purchase
Plan
Cancellation
of
REIT
A
Units
Total
Units
outstanding
on
February
19,
2015
Percentage
of
all
Units
REIT
A
Units
103,420,221
2,236,530
4,765
157,608
2,936,023
(832,200)
13,628
107,936,575
99.4%
228,186
252,044
545
(835,000)
107,582,350
99.4%
LP
B
Units
3,538,457
-‐
-‐
-‐
(2,936,023)
-‐
-‐
602,434
0.6%
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
602,434
0.6%
Total
106,958,678
2,236,530
4,765
157,608
-‐
(832,200)
13,628
108,539,009
100.0%
228,186
252,044
545
(835,000)
108,184,784
100.0%
Exchange
of
REIT
B
Units
for
REIT
A
Units
On
July
23,
2014,
one
of
the
holders
of
the
subsidiary
redeemable
units
surrendered
2,936,023
subsidiary
redeemable
units
and
received
2,936,023
REIT
B
Units.
On
July
24,
2014,
2,936,023
REIT
B
Units
were
exchanged
for
2,936,023
REIT
A
Units.
Short
form
base
shelf
prospectus
On
November
26,
2012,
the
Trust
issued
a
short
form
base
shelf
prospectus,
which
is
valid
for
a
25-‐month
period,
during
which
time
the
Trust
may
offer
and
issue,
from
time
to
time,
units
and
debt
securities
convertible
into
or
exchangeable
for
Units
of
the
Trust,
or
any
combination
thereof,
with
an
aggregate
offering
price
of
up
to
$2.0
billion.
The
short
form
base
shelf
prospectus
expired
on
December
26,
2014,
and
has
not
yet
been
renewed.
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
the
Trust
completed
the
issuance
of
$150
million
(December
31,
2013
–
$300
million)
aggregate
principal
amount
of
senior
unsecured
debentures
under
the
short
form
base
shelf
prospectus.
Normal
course
issuer
bid
The
Trust
renewed
its
normal
course
issuer
bid,
which
commenced
on
June
20,
2014
and
will
remain
in
effect
until
the
earlier
of
June
19,
2015
or
the
date
on
which
the
Trust
has
purchased
the
maximum
number
of
REIT
A
Units
permitted
under
the
bid.
Under
the
bid,
the
Trust
has
the
ability
to
purchase
for
cancellation
up
to
a
maximum
of
10,298,296
REIT
A
Units
(representing
10%
of
the
Trust’s
public
float
of
102,982,963
REIT
A
Units
at
the
time
of
entering
the
bid
through
the
facilities
of
the
TSX).
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
832,200
REIT
A
Units
had
been
purchased
and
subsequently
cancelled
under
the
bid
for
a
total
cost
of
$20.9
million
(December
31,
2013
–
2,134,800
REIT
A
Units
had
been
purchased
and
subsequently
cancelled
under
the
previous
bid
for
a
total
cost
of
$60.7
million).
Subsequent
to
year-‐end,
the
Trust
purchased
an
additional
835,000
REIT
A
Units
at
a
total
cost
of
approximately
$22.3
million.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
26
Distribution
policy
Our
Declaration
of
Trust
provides
our
trustees
with
the
discretion
to
determine
the
percentage
payout
of
income
that
would
be
in
the
best
interest
of
the
Trust,
which
allows
for
any
unforeseen
expenditures
and
the
variability
in
cash
distributions
as
a
result
of
additional
units
issued
pursuant
to
the
Trust’s
DRIP.
The
Trust
determines
the
distribution
rate
by,
among
other
considerations,
its
assessment
of
cash
flow
as
determined
using
adjusted
cash
flows
from
operating
activities
(a
non-‐GAAP
measure),
which
includes
cash
flows
from
operating
activities
of
our
investments
in
joint
ventures
that
are
equity
accounted
and
excludes
the
fluctuations
in
non-‐cash
working
capital,
transaction
costs
on
business
combinations
and
investment
in
lease
incentives
and
initial
direct
leasing
costs.
As
such,
the
Trust
believes
the
cash
distributions
are
not
an
economic
return
of
capital,
but
a
distribution
of
sustainable
adjusted
cash
flow
from
operating
activities.
Based
on
current
facts
and
assumptions,
the
Trust
does
not
anticipate
cash
distributions
will
be
reduced
or
suspended
in
the
foreseeable
future.
The
table
below
summarizes
the
distributions
for
the
three
and
twelve
months
ended
December
31,
2014:
Three
months
ended
December
31,
2014
Year
ended
December
31,
2014
Declared
distributions
4%
bonus
distributions(1)
Declared
Total
distributions
4%
bonus
distributions(1)
$
$
$
479
$
246
725
42,363
20,259
62,622
2014
distributions(2)
Paid
in
cash
or
reinvested
in
units
Payable
at
December
31,
2014
Total
distributions
2014
reinvestment(2)
Reinvested
to
December
31,
2014
Reinvested
on
January
15,
2015
Total
distributions
reinvested
Distributions
paid
in
cash(2)
Reinvestment
to
distribution
ratio
Cash
payout
ratio
(1)
Unitholders
who
participate
in
the
DRIP
receive
an
additional
distribution
of
units
equal
to
4%
of
each
cash
distribution
that
was
reinvested.
(2)
Includes
distributions
on
LP
B
Units.
55,788
5,891
61,679
180,541
25.5%
74.5%
11,987
5,891
17,878
44,744
28.5%
71.5%
221,961
20,259
242,220
12,466
6,127
18,593
42,842
20,505
63,347
479
236
715
$
2,232
$
246
2,478
2,232
236
2,468
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Total
224,193
20,505
244,698
58,020
6,127
64,147
Distributions
declared
for
the
three
months
ended
December
31,
2014
were
$62.6
million,
up
$2.6
million
over
the
prior
year
comparative
quarter.
Distributions
declared
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
were
$242.2
million,
up
$6.5
million
over
the
prior
year.
The
increase
mainly
reflects
a
larger
number
of
Units
outstanding
as
a
result
of
the
equity
issuance
completed
in
2013,
distributions
reinvested
in
additional
Units
and
vested
deferred
trust
units
exchanged
for
REIT
A
Units,
as
well
as
an
increase
in
the
distribution
rate
commencing
Q2
2013,
offset
by
REIT
A
Units
buyback.
Of
the
distributions
declared
for
the
three
months
ended
December
31,
2014,
$17.9
million,
or
approximately
28.5%,
was
reinvested
in
additional
REIT
A
Units
(year
ended
December
31,
2014
–
$61.7
million,
or
approximately
25.5%,
was
reinvested
in
additional
REIT
A
Units),
resulting
in
the
three
months
ended
December
31,
2014
cash
payout
ratio
of
71.5%
(year
ended
December
31,
2014
–
74.5%).
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
27
OUR
RESULTS
OF
OPERATIONS
Basis
of
accounting
Our
discussion
of
results
of
operations
in
the
table
below
includes
our
share
of
income
from
investment
in
joint
ventures.
Investment
properties
revenue
Investment
properties
operating
expenses
Net
rental
income
Other
income
Share
of
net
income
and
dilution
gain
(loss)
from
investment
in
Dream
Industrial
REIT
Interest
and
fee
income
Other
expenses
General
and
administrative
Interest:
Debt
Subsidiary
redeemable
units
Amortization
of
external
management
contracts
and
depreciation
on
property
and
equipment
Fair
value
adjustments,
net
gains
(losses)
on
transactions
and
other
activities
Fair
value
adjustments
to
investment
properties
Fair
value
adjustments
to
financial
instruments
Net
gains
(losses)
on
transactions
and
other
activities
Income
before
income
taxes
Deferred
income
taxes
Net
income
for
the
period
Other
comprehensive
income
(loss)
Unrealized
gain
(loss)
on
interest
rate
swaps
Unrealized
foreign
currency
translation
gain
$
Three
months
ended
December
31,
2013
208,418
$
(92,171)
116,247
2014
205,186
$
(91,015)
114,171
Year
ended
December
31,
2013
2014
800,531
817,995
(347,643)
(356,045)
452,888
461,950
$
3,699
908
4,607
3,027
942
3,969
15,965
3,234
19,199
15,697
4,690
20,387
(5,882)
(6,155)
(24,396)
(24,061)
(37,825)
(338)
(800)
(44,845)
(67,300)
2,689
(1,716)
(66,327)
7,606
(300)
7,306
(38,365)
(1,981)
(693)
(47,194)
(12,627)
251
(1,755)
(14,131)
58,891
865
59,756
(152,677)
(4,638)
(148,369)
(7,897)
(2,970)
(184,681)
(2,531)
(182,858)
(128,456)
2,749
(10,833)
(136,540)
159,928
(638)
159,290
127,453
34,840
(7,355)
154,938
445,355
(344)
445,011
39
1,942
1,981
446,992
(323)
1,675
1,352
8,658
$
(480)
1,085
605
60,361
$
(666)
3,210
2,544
161,834
$
Comprehensive
income
for
the
period
$
Investment
properties
revenue
Investment
properties
revenue
includes
net
rental
income
from
investment
properties
as
well
as
the
recovery
of
operating
costs
and
property
taxes
from
tenants.
Investment
properties
revenue
for
the
quarter
was
$205.2
million,
a
decrease
of
$3.2
million,
or
1.6%,
over
the
prior
year
comparative
quarter,
mainly
due
to
lower
in-‐place
occupancy,
decline
in
straight-‐line
rent,
increase
in
amortization
of
lease
incentives
and
dispositions
during
2014,
offset
by
acquisitions
completed
in
2013.
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
investment
properties
revenue
was
$818.0
million,
an
increase
of
$17.5
million,
or
2.2%,
over
the
prior
year.
The
increase
was
mainly
attributable
to
the
acquisitions
completed
in
2013,
offset
by
the
explanations
noted
previously.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
28
Investment
properties
operating
expenses
Investment
properties
operating
expenses
comprises
occupancy
costs
and
property
taxes
as
well
as
certain
expenses
that
are
not
recoverable
from
tenants,
the
majority
of
which
are
related
to
leasing.
Operating
expenses
fluctuate
with
changes
in
occupancy
levels
and
levels
of
repairs
and
maintenance.
Investment
properties
operating
expenses
for
the
quarter
was
$91.0
million,
a
decrease
of
$1.2
million,
or
1.3%,
over
the
prior
year
comparative
quarter,
mainly
due
to
lower
in-‐place
occupancy
and
dispositions
during
2014,
offset
by
acquisitions
completed
in
2013.
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
investment
properties
operating
expenses
were
$356.0
million,
an
increase
of
$8.4
million,
or
2.4%,
over
the
prior
year.
The
increase
was
mainly
attributable
to
the
acquisitions
completed
in
2013,
offset
by
dispositions
during
2014.
Interest
and
fee
income
Interest
and
fee
income
comprises
fees
earned
from
third-‐party
property
management,
including
management,
construction
and
leasing
fees,
and
interest
earned
on
bank
accounts
and
related
fees.
Except
for
the
third-‐party
property
management
fees,
the
income
included
in
interest
and
fee
income
is
not
necessarily
of
a
recurring
nature
and
the
amounts
may
vary
quarter-‐
over-‐quarter.
Interest
and
fee
income
for
the
quarter
remained
relatively
flat
at
$0.9
million
when
compared
to
the
prior
year
comparative
quarter
(for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
–
$3.2
million,
a
decrease
of
$1.5
million,
or
31.0%,
over
the
prior
year).
The
decrease
was
mainly
attributable
to
the
decrease
in
property
management
fees
subsequent
to
the
acquisition
of
our
joint
venture’s
two-‐third
interest
in
IBM
Corporate
Park,
and
the
higher
interest
income
earned
on
the
excess
cash
on
hand
during
the
prior
year.
General
and
administrative
expenses
The
following
table
summarizes
the
nature
of
expenses
included:
Asset
management
fees
Deferred
compensation
expense
Other(1)
General
and
administrative
expenses
(1)
Other
comprises
corporate
management,
Board
of
Trusteesʼ
fees
and
expenses,
and
investor
relations
expenses.
$
$
Three
months
ended
December
31,
2013
4,286
$
943
926
6,155
$
2014
4,244
$
787
851
5,882
$
Year
ended
December
31,
2013
2014
16,568
17,093
$
4,087
3,707
3,406
3,596
24,061
24,396
$
General
and
administrative
expenses
for
the
quarter
were
$5.9
million,
a
decrease
of
$0.3
million,
or
4.4%,
over
the
prior
year
comparative
quarter,
mainly
attributable
to
fair
value
adjustments
to
vested
DUIP
units
during
the
quarter
and
lower
professional
fees.
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
general
and
administrative
expenses
were
$24.4
million,
an
increase
of
$0.3
million,
or
1.4%,
over
the
prior
year.
The
increase
was
mainly
driven
by
higher
asset
management
fees
related
to
acquisitions
completed
in
2013,
along
with
higher
general
corporate
costs
resulting
from
the
growth
of
the
portfolio
and
more
DUIP
units
vesting,
offset
by
fair
value
adjustments
to
vested
DUIP
units
during
the
year.
Interest
expense
–
debt
Interest
expense
on
debt
for
the
three
months
ended
December
31,
2014
was
$37.8
million,
a
decrease
of
$0.5
million,
or
1.4%,
over
the
prior
year
comparative
quarter,
primarily
due
to
interest
expense
savings
from
the
refinancing
of
maturing
debt
at
lower
interest
rates
in
2013
and
in
2014
and
higher
rate
mortgages
assumed
by
the
purchaser
upon
disposition
of
certain
investment
properties
sold
during
2014.
Interest
expense
on
debt
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
was
$152.7
million,
an
increase
of
$4.3
million,
or
2.9%,
over
the
prior
year.
The
increase
in
interest
expense
on
debt
for
the
year
resulted
mainly
from
carrying
more
debt
from
acquisitions
in
2013
and
through
Units
buyback
predominantly
during
this
quarter,
offset
by
interest
expense
savings
from
the
refinancing
of
maturing
debt
at
lower
interest
rates
in
2013
and
in
2014
and
mortgages
assumed
by
the
purchaser
upon
disposition
of
certain
investment
properties
sold
during
2014.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
29
Interest
expense
–
subsidiary
redeemable
units
Interest
expense
on
subsidiary
redeemable
units
for
the
quarter
was
$0.3
million,
a
decrease
of
$1.6
million,
or
82.9%,
over
the
prior
year
comparative
quarter
(for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
–
$4.6
million,
a
decrease
of
$3.3
million,
or
41.3%,
over
the
prior
year).
The
decrease
was
mainly
attributable
to
one
of
the
holders
of
the
subsidiary
redeemable
units
surrendering
2,936,023
subsidiary
redeemable
units
and
receiving
2,936,023
REIT
A
Units.
Amortization
of
external
management
contracts
and
depreciation
on
property
and
equipment
Amortization
of
external
management
contracts
and
depreciation
on
property
and
equipment
expense
for
the
quarter
was
$0.8
million,
an
increase
of
$0.1
million,
or
15.4%,
over
the
prior
year
comparative
quarter
(for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
–
$3.0
million,
an
increase
of
$0.4
million,
or
17.3%,
over
the
prior
year).
The
increase
was
primarily
due
to
an
increase
in
property
and
equipment.
Fair
value
adjustments
to
investment
properties
Fair
value
adjustments
to
investment
properties
for
the
quarter
resulted
in
a
loss
of
$67.3
million
(for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
–
a
loss
of
$128.5
million),
mainly
driven
by
externally
appraised
properties
in
Western
Canada
and
Calgary,
where
the
external
appraisers
assumed
lowered
market
rents
and
increased
downtimes
in
selected
assets.
Other
factors
which
contributed
to
the
fair
value
decline
included
changes
in
rental
rates
and
leasing
assumptions,
mainly
in
Western
Canada
and
Calgary
downtown
properties
with
previously
identified
future
tenant
vacancies.
The
weighted
average
cap
rate
across
our
total
portfolio
before
redevelopment
properties,
assets
held
for
sale
and
sold
properties
compressed
by
2
bps
to
6.16%
when
compared
to
September
30,
2014
and
December
31,
2013.
The
overall
decrease
in
cap
rates
was
mainly
experienced
in
Toronto
downtown
and
Eastern
Canada,
offset
by
modest
increases
in
other
regions.
Fair
value
adjustments
to
financial
instruments
Fair
value
adjustments
to
financial
instruments
include
remeasurement
on
the
conversion
feature
of
the
convertible
debenture,
remeasurement
of
the
carrying
value
of
subsidiary
redeemable
units
and
remeasurement
of
deferred
trust
units.
Our
remeasurement
of
the
conversion
feature
of
the
convertible
debenture
resulted
in
a
loss
of
$0.3
million
during
the
quarter
(gain
of
$0.5
million
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014),
mainly
as
a
result
of
fluctuations
in
the
unit
price,
credit
spread
and
historical
volatility
inputs
used
to
value
the
conversion
feature
of
the
convertible
debenture.
Our
remeasurement
of
the
carrying
value
of
subsidiary
redeemable
units
resulted
in
a
gain
of
$1.7
million
during
the
quarter
(gain
of
$1.5
million
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014),
mainly
as
a
result
of
a
decrease
in
the
unit
price
during
the
quarter
and
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014.
The
remeasurement
of
the
deferred
trust
units
resulted
in
a
gain
of
$1.3
million
during
the
quarter
(gain
of
$0.8
million
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014),
mainly
as
a
result
of
a
decrease
in
the
unit
price
during
the
quarter
and
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014.
Net
gains
(losses)
on
transactions
and
other
activities
The
following
table
summarizes
the
nature
of
expenses
included:
Debt
settlement
costs
Net
loss
on
sale
of
investment
properties
Internal
leasing
costs
Business
transformation
costs
Total
Three
months
ended
December
31,
2013
-‐
-‐
(1,755)
-‐
(1,755)
2014
(683)
$
-‐
(758)
(275)
(1,716)
$
$
$
$
$
Year
ended
December
31,
2013
2014
(241)
(1,892)
$
(283)
(1,496)
(6,831)
(6,345)
(1,100)
-‐
(7,355)
(10,833)
$
Net
losses
on
transactions
and
other
activities
for
the
quarter
remained
flat
at
$1.7
million
over
the
prior
year
comparative
quarter
(for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
–
$10.8
million,
an
increase
of
$3.5
million,
or
47.2%,
over
the
prior
year).
During
the
quarter,
the
Trust
incurred
$0.7
million
of
debt
settlement
costs
related
to
the
early
discharge
of
mortgages
associated
with
Adelaide
Place
and
Airway
Centre
1
and
2–4.
Included
within
internal
leasing
costs
during
the
quarter
is
a
one-‐
time
cost
recovery
of
$1.4
million
from
third-‐party
managed
properties
related
to
leasing
services
provided
prior
to
2014.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
30
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
the
overall
increase
in
net
losses
on
transactions
and
other
activities
was
mainly
driven
by
an
increase
in
debt
settlement
costs,
increase
in
net
loss
on
sale
due
to
the
sale
of
nine
investment
properties
for
the
year
compared
to
two
properties
in
the
prior
year,
and
business
transformation
costs
incurred
in
the
year
as
part
of
the
Shared
Services
and
Cost
Sharing
Agreement
entered
into
with
Dream
Asset
Management
Corp.
(“DAM”),
formerly
known
as
Dundee
Realty
Corporation,
a
subsidiary
of
Dream
Unlimited
Corp.,
in
December
2013.
The
business
transformation
costs
relate
to
process
and
technology
improvement
costs.
We
are
presently
in
the
early
stages
of
a
new
initiative
that
will
transform
our
operating
platform
to
allow
us
to
improve
data
integrity,
realize
operating
efficiencies,
establish
business
analytic
tools
and
ultimately
generate
better
business
outcomes.
This
initiative
will
form
the
foundation
of
our
continuous
improvement
culture.
Related
party
transactions
From
time
to
time,
the
Trust
and
its
subsidiaries
enter
into
transactions
with
related
parties
that
are
conducted
under
normal
commercial
terms.
Asset
Management
Agreement
with
DAM
The
Asset
Management
Agreement
provides
for
a
broad
range
of
asset
management
services
for
the
following
fees:
•
•
•
•
•
base
annual
management
fee
calculated
and
payable
on
a
monthly
basis,
equal
to
0.25%
of
the
gross
asset
value
of
properties,
defined
as
the
fair
value
of
the
properties
at
August
23,
2007
(the
date
of
the
sale
of
our
portfolio
of
properties
in
Eastern
Canada)
plus
the
purchase
price
of
properties
acquired
subsequent
to
that
date,
adjusted
for
any
properties
sold;
incentive
fee
equal
to
15%
of
Dream
Office
REIT’s
adjusted
funds
from
operations
per
unit
in
excess
of
$2.65
per
unit;
capital
expenditures
fee
equal
to
5%
of
all
hard
construction
costs
incurred
on
each
capital
project
with
costs
in
excess
of
$1
million,
excluding
work
done
on
behalf
of
tenants
or
any
maintenance
capital
expenditures;
acquisition
fee,
calculated
over
a
fiscal
year
based
on
the
anniversary
date
of
the
Asset
Management
Agreement,
equal
to:
(i)
1.0%
of
the
purchase
price
of
a
property
on
the
first
$100
million
of
properties
acquired;
(ii)
0.75%
of
the
purchase
price
of
a
property
on
the
next
$100
million
of
properties
acquired;
and
(iii)
0.50%
of
the
purchase
price
of
a
property
acquired
in
excess
of
$200
million
of
properties
acquired;
and
financing
fee
equal
to
the
lesser
of
actual
expenses
incurred
by
DAM
in
supplying
services
relating
to
financing
transactions
and
0.25%
of
the
debt
and
equity
of
all
financing
transactions
completed
on
behalf
of
Dream
Office
REIT.
Pursuant
to
the
Asset
Management
Agreement
with
DAM,
the
following
is
a
summary
of
fees
incurred
for
the
three
and
twelve
months
ended
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013:
Base
annual
management
fee
(included
in
general
and
administrative
expenses)
Acquisition
fee
(included
in
investment
properties)
Expense
reimbursements
(recovery)
related
to
financing
arrangements
(included
in
debt)
Total
incurred
under
the
Asset
Management
Agreement
Three
months
ended
December
31,
2013
2014
Year
ended
December
31,
2013
2014
$
$
4,244
$
-‐
4,287
81
$
17,093
$
-‐
16,568
3,201
(245)
3,999
$
185
4,553
$
319
17,412
$
825
20,594
Shared
Services
and
Cost
Sharing
Agreement
with
DAM
Pursuant
to
the
Shared
Services
and
Cost
Sharing
Agreement
with
DAM,
the
following
is
a
summary
of
fees
incurred
for
the
three
and
twelve
months
ended
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013:
Business
transformation
costs
Strategic
services
and
other
Total
costs
incurred
under
the
Shared
Services
and
Cost
Sharing
$
Three
months
ended
December
31,
2013
-‐
-‐
-‐
2014
275
$
97
372
$
$
Year
ended
December
31,
2013
-‐
-‐
-‐
2014
1,100
$
405
1,505
$
$
$
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
31
Services
Agreement
with
Dream
Industrial
REIT
The
following
is
a
summary
of
the
cost
recoveries
from
Dream
Industrial
REIT
for
the
three
and
twelve
months
ended
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013:
Cost
recoveries
charged
to
Dream
Industrial
REIT:
Services
Agreement
with
Dream
Industrial
REIT
Total
cost
recoveries
from
Dream
Industrial
REIT
$
$
1,640
1,640
$
$
2,177
2,177
$
$
5,999
5,999
$
$
5,130
5,130
Three
months
ended
December
31,
2013
2014
Year
ended
December
31,
2013
2014
Deferred
income
taxes
expense
Deferred
income
taxes
expense
for
the
three
and
twelve
months
ended
December
31,
2014
were
$0.3
million
and
$0.6
million,
respectively,
which
related
to
the
two
investment
properties
located
in
the
United
States
(“U.S.”).
Other
comprehensive
income
(loss)
Other
comprehensive
income
(loss)
comprises
unrealized
gain
(loss)
on
interest
rate
swaps
and
unrealized
foreign
currency
translation
gain
related
to
the
two
properties
located
in
the
United
States.
For
the
three
and
twelve
months
ended
December
31,
2014,
other
comprehensive
income
amounted
to
$1.4
million
and
$2.5
million,
respectively.
The
increase
in
overall
comprehensive
income
(loss)
for
the
three
and
twelve
months
ended
December
31,
2014
was
mainly
driven
by
the
strong
U.S.
dollar
in
relation
to
the
Canadian
dollar
throughout
2014.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
32
Net
operating
income
(“NOI”)
We
define
NOI
as
the
total
of
net
rental
income,
including
the
share
of
net
rental
income
from
investment
in
joint
ventures
and
property
management
income,
excluding
net
rental
income
from
properties
sold
and
assets
held
for
sale.
NOI
is
an
important
measure
used
by
management
in
evaluating
property
operation;
however,
it
is
not
defined
by
IFRS,
does
not
have
a
standard
meaning
and
may
not
be
comparable
with
similar
measures
presented
by
other
income
trusts.
In
compliance
with
Canadian
Securities
Administrators
Staff
Notice
52-‐306
(Revised),
“Non-‐GAAP
Financial
Measures”,
NOI
has
been
reconciled
to
net
rental
income
in
the
“Non-‐GAAP
measures
and
other
disclosures”
section
of
the
MD&A.
The
following
pie
chart
illustrates
NOI
by
region
as
a
percentage
of
total
NOI
excluding
properties
sold
and
properties
held
for
sale
for
the
three
months
ended
December
31,
2014.
NOI
BY
REGION
(Three
months
ended
December
31,
2014)
Eastern
Canada,
17%
Western
Canada,
20%
Toronto
suburban,
13%
Calgary
downtown,
16%
Toronto
downtown,
31%
Calgary
suburban,
3%
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
33
NOI
comparative
portfolio
NOI
shown
below
details
comparative
and
non-‐comparative
items
to
assist
in
understanding
the
impact
each
component
has
on
NOI.
The
comparative
properties
disclosed
in
the
following
table
are
properties
acquired
prior
to
January
1,
2013.
Income
from,
properties
sold
and
properties
held
for
sale
contributing
to
NOI
in
comparative
periods
are
shown
separately.
Comparative
NOI
and
NOI
attributed
to
acquisitions
exclude
lease
termination
fees,
bad
debt
expense,
one-‐time
property
adjustments,
straight-‐
line
rents
and
amortization
of
lease
incentives.
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
NOI
from
comparative
properties
increased
by
0.5%,
or
$2.2
million,
over
the
prior
year,
with
increases
across
all
regions,
except
for
Calgary
suburban
and
Toronto
suburban.
The
overall
increase
was
mainly
driven
by
higher
rental
rates
achieved
on
new
leasing
completed
during
the
period
and
over
the
past
year
and
the
benefit
of
step
rents,
offset
by
lower
occupancy.
On
a
quarterly
basis,
NOI
from
comparative
properties
increased
by
0.7%,
or
$0.7
million,
over
the
prior
year
comparative
quarter,
with
increases
across
all
regions,
except
for
Calgary
downtown
and
Toronto
suburban.
$
Western
Canada
Calgary
–
downtown
Calgary
–
suburban
Toronto
–
downtown
Toronto
–
suburban
Eastern
Canada
Comparative
properties
Lease
termination
fees
and
other
Properties
held
for
redevelopment
Acquisitions
Straight-‐line
rent
Amortization
of
lease
incentives
NOI
NOI
from
properties
sold
and
properties
held
for
sale(1)
NOI
including
income
from
properties
$
sold
and
assets
held
for
sale
2013
$
Three
months
ended
December
31,
Growth
%
1.8
(6.0)
7.6
4.8
(3.6)
1.7
0.7
2014
$
20,993
16,341
2,740
30,920
15,487
19,334
105,815
546
(126)
9,877
778
(2,726)
20,616
17,383
2,547
29,500
16,069
19,004
105,119
621
(113)
9,319
1,848
(1,921)
Amount
377
(1,042)
193
1,420
(582)
330
696
(75)
(13)
558
(1,070)
(805)
(709)
Year
ended
December
31,
Growth
$
2014
$
83,807
68,931
10,283
120,508
63,324
77,084
423,937
1,869
(468)
38,846
4,612
(9,952)
2013
$
82,015
68,434
10,397
118,399
65,866
76,631
421,742
2,127
(532)
22,978
7,415
(6,343)
Amount
%
1,792
2.2
0.7
497
(114)
(1.1)
2,109
1.8
(2,542)
(3.9)
0.6
0.5
453
2,195
(258)
64
15,868
(2,803)
(3,609)
11,457
114,164
114,873
(0.6)
458,844
447,387
2.6
7
1,374
(1,367)
3,106
5,501
(2,395)
114,171
$
116,247
$
(2,076)
(1.8)
$
461,950
$
452,888
$
9,062
2.0
(1)
Includes
straight-‐line
rents
and
amortization
of
lease
incentives.
Western
Canada
increased
by
1.8%,
or
$0.4
million,
over
the
prior
year
comparative
quarter
(for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
–
an
increase
of
2.2%,
or
$1.8
million,
over
the
prior
year),
largely
due
to
higher
rents
on
renewals
and
step-‐up
in
rental
rates
for
certain
tenants,
offset
by
a
decline
in
weighted
average
in-‐place
occupancy
of
approximately
70,000
square
feet.
Calgary
downtown
decreased
by
6.0%,
or
$1.0
million,
over
the
prior
year
comparative
quarter,
primarily
due
to
a
decline
in
weighted
average
in-‐place
occupancy,
mainly
attributed
to
the
100,000
square
feet
of
previously
identified
vacates
taking
effect
in
the
prior
quarter.
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
the
increase
of
0.7%,
or
$0.5
million,
over
the
prior
year
was
mainly
attributable
to
higher
rents
on
renewals
and
step-‐up
in
rental
rates
and
recoveries
for
certain
tenants,
offset
by
a
decline
in
weighted
average
in-‐place
occupancy,
mainly
attributed
to
the
100,000
square
feet
of
previously
identified
vacates
taking
effect
in
the
prior
quarter.
Calgary
suburban
increased
by
7.6%,
or
$0.2
million,
over
the
prior
year
comparative
quarter,
mainly
due
to
higher
rents
on
renewals,
step-‐up
in
rental
rates
for
certain
tenants,
lower
non-‐recoverable
expenses
and
savings
in
operating
expenses
related
to
certain
government
tenants.
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
the
decrease
of
1.1%,
or
$0.1
million,
over
the
prior
year
was
mainly
attributable
to
a
decline
in
weighted
average
in-‐place
occupancy.
Toronto
downtown
increased
by
4.8%,
or
$1.4
million,
over
the
prior
year
comparative
quarter
(for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
–
an
increase
of
1.8%,
or
$2.1
million,
over
the
prior
year),
mainly
due
to
higher
rents
on
renewals,
step-‐up
in
rental
rates
for
certain
tenants
and
higher
weighted
average
in-‐place
occupancy
of
approximately
27,000
square
feet.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
34
Toronto
suburban
decreased
by
3.6%,
or
$0.6
million,
over
the
prior
year
comparative
quarter
(for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
–
a
decrease
of
3.9%,
or
$2.5
million,
over
the
prior
year),
mainly
due
to
a
decline
in
weighted
average
in-‐place
occupancy
of
approximately
210,000
square
feet,
offset
by
higher
rents
on
renewals
and
step-‐up
in
rental
rates
for
certain
tenants.
Eastern
Canada
increased
by
1.7%,
or
$0.3
million,
over
the
prior
year
comparative
quarter
(for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
–
an
increase
of
0.6%,
or
$0.5
million,
over
the
prior
year),
mainly
due
to
higher
rents
on
renewals
and
step-‐up
in
rental
rates
for
certain
tenants,
and
favourable
foreign
exchange
adjustments
in
our
U.S.
properties
of
$0.4
million
throughout
the
period.
This
was
offset
by
a
decline
in
weighted
average
in-‐place
occupancy
of
approximately
73,000
square
feet.
For
the
three
and
twelve
months
ended
December
31,
2014,
we
recognized
lease
termination
fees
and
other
adjustments
of
$0.5
million
and
$1.9
million,
respectively
(three
and
twelve
months
ended
December
31,
2013
–
$0.6
million
and
$2.1
million,
respectively).
NOI
prior
quarter
comparison
The
comparative
properties
disclosed
in
the
following
table
include
properties
acquired
prior
to
January
1,
2014.
Western
Canada
Calgary
–
downtown
Calgary
–
suburban
Toronto
–
downtown
Toronto
–
suburban
Eastern
Canada
Comparative
properties
Lease
termination
fees
and
other
Properties
held
for
redevelopment
Straight-‐line
rent
Amortization
of
lease
incentives
NOI
NOI
from
properties
sold
and
properties
held
for
sale(1)
NOI
including
income
from
properties
sold
and
assets
held
for
sale
(1)
Includes
straight-‐line
rents
and
amortization
of
lease
incentives.
December
31,
September
30,
2014
24,319
18,309
3,107
35,136
15,487
19,334
115,692
546
(126)
778
(2,726)
114,164
7
114,171
$
$
$
$
2014
24,270
19,485
3,011
34,424
15,472
19,300
115,962
97
(70)
513
(2,717)
113,785
635
114,420
$
$
Three
months
ended
Growth
Amount
49
(1,176)
96
712
15
34
(270)
449
(56)
265
(9)
379
(628)
(249)
%
0.2
(6.0)
3.2
2.1
0.1
0.2
(0.2)
0.3
(0.2)
Comparative
properties
NOI
decreased
by
0.2%,
or
$0.3
million,
over
the
prior
quarter.
Calgary
downtown
decreased
by
6.0%,
or
$1.2
million,
over
the
prior
quarter,
mainly
due
to
a
tenant
that
vacated
approximately
100,000
square
feet
in
the
previous
quarter
and
lower
average
in-‐place
rents.
Calgary
suburban
increased
by
3.2%,
or
$0.1
million,
over
the
prior
quarter,
mainly
due
to
an
increase
in
weighted
average
in-‐place
occupancy
and
higher
rents
on
renewals
and
step-‐up
in
rental
rates
for
certain
tenants.
Toronto
downtown
increased
by
2.1%,
or
$0.7
million,
over
the
prior
quarter,
mainly
due
to
an
increase
in
weighted
average
in-‐place
occupancy
of
approximately
39,000
square
feet
and
higher
rents
on
renewals
and
step-‐up
in
rental
rates
for
certain
tenants.
Western
Canada,
Toronto
suburban
and
Eastern
Canada
remained
relatively
flat
over
the
prior
quarter.
For
the
three
months
ended
December
31,
2014,
we
recognized
lease
termination
fees
and
other
adjustments
of
$0.5
million
(three
months
ended
September
30,
2014
–
$0.1
million).
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
35
Funds
from
operations
and
adjusted
funds
from
operations
Net
income
for
the
period
Add
(deduct):
Share
of
net
income
and
dilution
gain
(loss)
from
investment
in
Dream
Industrial
REIT
Share
of
FFO
from
investment
in
Dream
Industrial
REIT
Depreciation
and
amortization
Loss
on
sale
of
investment
properties
Interest
expense
on
subsidiary
redeemable
units
Fair
value
adjustments
to
investment
properties
Fair
value
adjustments
to
financial
instruments
and
DUIP
included
in
general
and
administrative
expenses
(“G&A”)
Debt
settlement
costs
Internal
leasing
costs
Deferred
income
taxes
expense
(recovery)
Lease
termination
write-‐offs
Other
FFO
Funds
from
operations
Add
(deduct):
Share
of
FFO
from
investment
in
Dream
Industrial
REIT
Share
of
AFFO
from
investment
in
Dream
Industrial
REIT
Amortization
of
fair
value
adjustments
on
assumed
debt
Deferred
unit
compensation
expense
Straight-‐line
rent
Business
transformation
costs
Other
Deduct:
Normalized
initial
direct
leasing
costs
and
lease
incentives
AFFO
Funds
from
operations
Three
months
ended
December
31,
Year
ended
December
31,
$
2014
7,306
$
2013
59,756
$
2014
159,290
$
2013
445,011
(3,699)
4,565
3,526
-‐
338
67,300
(2,918)
683
758
300
-‐
(10)
78,149
$
(3,027)
3,860
2,629
-‐
1,981
12,627
(417)
-‐
1,755
(865)
-‐
(57)
78,242
$
(15,965)
16,412
12,922
1,496
4,638
128,456
(3,441)
1,892
6,345
638
336
(190)
312,829
$
(15,697)
15,104
8,878
283
7,897
(127,453)
(35,070)
241
6,831
344
45
(167)
306,247
78,149
$
78,242
$
312,829
$
306,247
(4,565)
3,767
(1,110)
1,016
(778)
275
(54)
76,700
(3,860)
3,116
(1,370)
1,109
(1,848)
-‐
(400)
74,989
(16,412)
13,511
(4,754)
4,399
(4,612)
1,100
(433)
305,628
(15,104)
12,052
(6,633)
4,317
(7,415)
-‐
(260)
293,204
$
$
(8,130)
68,570
$
(8,005)
66,984
$
(32,568)
273,060
$
(31,428)
261,776
$
FFO
FFO
per
unit
–
basic(1)
FFO
per
unit
–
diluted(1)
(1)
The
LP
B
Units
are
included
in
the
calculation
of
basic
and
diluted
FFO
per
unit.
$
$
$
Three
months
ended
December
31,
Year
ended
December
31,
2014
78,149
0.72
0.71
$
$
$
2013
78,242
0.72
0.72
$
$
$
2014
312,829
2.88
2.87
$
$
$
2013
306,247
2.88
2.87
Total
FFO
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
was
$312.8
million,
an
increase
of
$6.6
million,
or
2.1%,
over
the
prior
year
(FFO
for
the
quarter
was
$78.1
million,
a
decrease
of
$0.1
million,
or
0.1%,
over
the
prior
year
comparative
quarter).
Diluted
FFO
on
a
per
unit
basis
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
remained
flat
at
$2.87
per
unit
over
the
prior
year
(diluted
FFO
on
a
per
unit
basis
for
the
quarter
decreased
to
$0.71
from
$0.72
over
the
prior
year
comparative
quarter).
The
decrease
in
diluted
FFO
per
unit
over
the
prior
year
comparative
quarter
primarily
resulted
from
the
favourable
points
noted
below
offset
by
write-‐off
of
straight-‐line
rent
due
to
early
lease
terminations
during
2014
and
dispositions
completed
during
2014.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
36
Adjusted
funds
from
operations
AFFO
AFFO
per
unit
–
basic(1)
(1)
The
LP
B
Units
are
included
in
the
calculation
of
basic
AFFO
per
unit.
$
$
Three
months
ended
December
31,
Year
ended
December
31,
2014
68,570
0.63
$
$
2013
66,984
0.62
$
$
2014
273,060
2.52
$
$
2013
261,776
2.47
Total
AFFO
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
was
$273.1
million,
an
increase
of
$11.3
million,
or
4.3%,
over
the
prior
year
comparative
period
(AFFO
for
the
quarter
was
$68.6
million,
an
increase
of
$1.6
million,
or
2.4%,
over
the
prior
year
comparative
quarter).
Basic
AFFO
on
a
per
unit
basis
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
increased
to
$2.52
from
$2.47
over
the
prior
year
comparative
period
(AFFO
on
a
per
unit
basis
for
the
quarter
increased
to
$0.63
from
$0.62
over
the
prior
year
comparative
quarter).
The
increase
in
basic
AFFO
per
unit
over
the
prior
year
and
prior
year
comparative
quarter
resulted
from:
0.5%
and
0.7%
growth
in
comparative
properties
NOI
over
the
prior
year
and
prior
year
comparative
quarter,
respectively;
•
•
• A
full
year
of
NOI
from
accretive
acquisitions
completed
in
2013;
and
Incremental
increase
in
AFFO
from
our
investment
in
Dream
Industrial
REIT;
•
Interest
rate
savings
upon
refinancing
of
maturing
debt;
Offset
by:
• Dispositions
completed
during
2014.
SELECTED
ANNUAL
INFORMATION
The
following
table
provides
selected
financial
information
for
the
past
three
years:
Investment
properties
revenue(1)
Income
from
continuing
operations
Net
income
Total
assets(1)
Non-‐current
debt(1)
Total
debt(1)
Distributions
declared
Distribution
rate
(per
unit)
Units
outstanding:
REIT
Units,
Series
A
REIT
Units,
Series
B
LP
Class
B
Units,
Series
1
$
2014
817,995
$
159,290
159,290
7,558,895
3,216,411
3,594,341
242,220
2.24
2013
800,531
$
445,011
445,011
7,667,742
3,380,891
3,662,543
235,751
2.23
2012
686,564
266,174
291,073
6,913,744
2,960,313
3,314,594
203,596
2.20
107,936,575
-‐
602,434
103,420,221
-‐
3,538,457
97,618,625
16,316
3,528,658
(1)
Includes
investment
in
joint
ventures,
which
are
equity
accounted,
and
properties
held
for
sale.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
37
QUARTERLY
INFORMATION
The
following
tables
show
quarterly
information
since
January
1,
2013.
Key
leasing,
financing,
portfolio
and
results
of
operations
quarterly
information
Leasing
Occupancy
–
including
committed
(period-‐end)
Occupancy
–
in
place
(period-‐end)
Occupancy
–
national
industry
average
Tenant
retention
ratio
Average
in-‐place
net
rent
per
square
foot
(period-‐end)(1)
$
Q4
Q3
Q2
93.0%
91.4%
89.3%
64.4%
93.0%
91.1%
89.7%
34.5%
94.1%
92.5%
89.6%
54.8%
2014
Q1
94.2%
92.5%
89.7%
62.6%
Q4
Q3
Q2
94.3%
92.7%
90.3%
67.8%
94.6%
93.6%
90.9%
64.1%
94.9%
93.8%
91.3%
61.5%
2013
Q1
94.7%
93.7%
91.5%
56.5%
18.22
$
7.8%
18.21
$
8.2%
18.14
$
8.0%
4.20%
4.15%
Market
rent/in-‐place
rent
(%)(1)
Financing
Weighted
average
effective
interest
rate
on
debt
(period-‐end)
Weighted
average
face
rate
of
interest
on
debt
(period-‐end)
Interest
coverage
ratio
(times)
Net
average
debt-‐to-‐EBITDFV
(years)
Level
of
debt
(net
debt-‐to-‐gross
book
value)
Debt
–
average
term
to
maturity
(years)
Unencumbered
assets
(in
millions)
Portfolio
Number
of
properties
GLA
(millions
of
sq.
ft.)(2)
(1)
Comparative
figures
have
been
reclassified
to
conform
to
the
current
period
presentation.
(2)
Excludes
redevelopment
properties
and
properties
held
for
sale.
4.18%
2.9
7.8
47.5%
4.4
796
$
4.21%
2.9
7.8
46.9%
4.2
794
$
177
24.2
177
24.2
$
4.19%
4.22%
2.9
7.9
47.3%
4.4
793
$
182
24.5
17.97
$
8.9%
17.83
$
8.9%
17.85
$
9.4%
17.54
$
10.8%
17.26
12.1%
4.19%
4.18%
4.22%
4.26%
4.33%
4.23%
2.9
8.0
47.6%
4.6
771
$
4.22%
2.9
8.0
47.6%
4.6
622
$
4.28%
2.9
7.8
47.0%
4.8
568
$
4.35%
2.9
8.0
46.4%
4.8
377
$
4.49%
2.9
8.0
47.3%
4.8
115
186
24.6
186
24.6
185
24.5
184
24.2
177
23.3
Results
of
operations
(in
thousands
of
Canadian
dollars)
Investment
properties
revenue
Investment
properties
operating
expenses
Net
rental
income
Other
income
Other
expenses
Fair
value
adjustments,
net
gains
(losses)
on
transactions
and
other
activities
Income
before
income
taxes
Deferred
income
taxes
recovery
(expense)
Net
income
for
the
period
Other
comprehensive
income
Q4
Q1
$
176,460
$
173,724
$
176,432
$
178,663
$
179,574
$
175,044
$
170,589
$
161,965
Q2
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q3
2014
2013
(77,702)
98,758
14,950
(40,108)
(74,449)
99,275
12,784
(40,548)
(74,339)
102,093
14,363
(43,507)
(77,281)
101,382
14,678
(42,790)
(78,732)
100,842
9,380
(42,684)
(74,181)
100,863
17,416
(41,902)
(73,570)
97,019
42,862
(40,802)
(69,189)
92,776
35,056
(39,041)
(65,994)
7,606
(16,608)
54,903
(26,226)
46,723
(22,574)
50,696
(8,647)
58,891
16,457
92,834
45,356
144,435
60,427
149,218
(300)
7,306
(36)
54,867
(155)
46,568
(147)
50,549
865
59,756
(475)
92,359
(182)
144,253
(552)
148,666
(loss)
1,352
1,708
(1,523)
1,007
605
(1,350)
2,705
21
Comprehensive
income
for
the
period
$
8,658
$
56,575
$
45,045
$
51,556
$
60,361
$
91,009
$
146,958
$
148,687
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
38
Calculation
of
funds
from
operations
(in
thousands
of
Canadian
dollars
except
for
unit
and
per
unit
amounts)
Net
income
for
the
period
Add
(deduct):
Share
of
net
income
and
dilution
gain
(loss)
from
investment
in
Dream
Industrial
REIT
Share
of
FFO
from
investment
in
Dream
Industrial
REIT
Depreciation
and
amortization
Loss
on
disposal
of
Q4
Q3
Q2
2014
Q1
Q4
Q3
Q2
$
7,306
$
54,867
$
46,568
$
50,549
$
59,756
$
92,359
$
144,253
$
2013
Q1
148,666
(3,699)
(3,291)
(5,386)
(3,589)
(3,027)
(3,454)
(2,884)
(6,332)
4,565
3,526
4,070
3,515
3,946
3,065
3,831
2,817
3,860
2,629
3,932
2,173
3,780
2,259
3,532
1,817
investment
properties
-‐
565
931
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
283
Interest
expense
on
subsidiary
redeemable
units
Fair
value
adjustments
to
investment
properties
Fair
value
adjustments
to
financial
instruments
and
DUIP
included
in
G&A
Debt
settlement
costs
Internal
leasing
costs
Deferred
income
taxes
expense
(recovery)
Other
338
337
1,982
1,981
1,981
1,982
1,986
1,948
67,300
17,644
25,197
18,315
12,627
(3,359)
(56,560)
(80,161)
(2,918)
683
758
(2,285)
-‐
1,969
746
-‐
1,718
1,016
1,209
1,900
(417)
-‐
1,755
(16,548)
-‐
1,736
(18,894)
241
1,732
789
-‐
1,610
FFO
FFO
per
unit
–
basic(1)
FFO
per
unit
–
diluted(1)
(1)
The
LP
B
Units
are
included
in
the
calculation
of
basic
and
diluted
FFO
per
unit.
77,389
$
0.71
$
0.71
$
$
$
$
300
(10)
78,149
$
0.72
$
0.71
$
36
(38)
155
265
79,187
$
0.73
$
0.73
$
147
(72)
(865)
(57)
475
2
78,104
$
0.73
$
0.72
$
78,242
$
0.72
$
0.72
$
79,298
$
0.73
$
0.73
$
182
(55)
$
$
$
76,040
0.72
0.71
552
(35)
72,669
0.72
0.71
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
39
Calculation
of
adjusted
funds
from
operations
(in
thousands
of
Canadian
dollars
except
for
unit
and
per
unit
amounts)
Funds
from
operations
Add
(deduct):
Q4
78,149
$
$
Q3
Q2
2014
Q1
Q4
Q3
Q2
77,389
$
79,187
$
78,104
$
78,242
$
79,298
$
76,040
$
2013
Q1
72,669
Share
of
FFO
from
investment
in
Dream
Industrial
REIT
Share
of
AFFO
from
investment
in
Dream
Industrial
REIT
Amortization
of
fair
value
(4,565)
(4,070)
(3,946)
(3,831)
(3,860)
(3,932)
(3,780)
(3,532)
3,767
3,325
3,277
3,142
3,116
3,154
3,050
2,732
adjustments
on
assumed
debt
(1,110)
(1,166)
(1,217)
(1,261)
(1,370)
(1,511)
(1,807)
(1,946)
Deferred
unit
compensation
expense
Straight-‐line
rent
Business
transformation
costs
Other
Deduct:
Normalized
initial
direct
leasing
1,016
(778)
275
(54)
76,700
1,016
(513)
275
(55)
76,201
1,307
(1,489)
274
(69)
77,324
1,060
(1,832)
276
(255)
75,403
1,109
(1,848)
-‐
(400)
74,989
1,108
(1,859)
-‐
244
76,502
1,129
(1,887)
-‐
(53)
72,692
971
(1,815)
-‐
(57)
69,022
$
$
(8,130)
68,570
$
0.63
$
costs
and
lease
incentives
Adjusted
funds
from
operations
AFFO
per
unit
–
basic(1)
Weighted
average
units
outstanding
for
FFO
and
AFFO
108,758
Basic
(in
thousands)
110,375
Diluted
(in
thousands)
(1)
The
LP
B
Units
are
included
in
the
calculation
of
basic
AFFO
per
unit.
(8,141)
68,060
$
0.63
$
109,232
110,849
(8,185)
69,139
$
0.64
$
(8,112)
67,291
$
0.62
$
(8,005)
66,984
$
0.62
$
(8,204)
68,298
$
0.63
$
(7,812)
64,880
$
0.61
$
(7,407)
61,615
0.61
108,301
109,938
107,728
109,231
108,082
109,691
108,671
110,290
106,226
107,861
101,564
103,171
NON-‐GAAP
MEASURES
AND
OTHER
DISCLOSURES
The
following
non-‐GAAP
measures
are
important
measures
used
by
management
in
evaluating
the
Trust’s
underlying
operating
performance
and
debt
management.
These
non-‐GAAP
measures
are
not
defined
by
IFRS,
do
not
have
a
standardized
meaning
and
may
not
be
comparable
with
similar
measures
presented
by
other
income
trusts.
Funds
from
operations
(“FFO”)
Management
believes
FFO
is
an
important
measure
of
our
operating
performance.
This
non-‐GAAP
measurement
is
a
commonly
used
measure
of
performance
of
real
estate
operations;
however,
it
does
not
represent
net
income
or
cash
generated
from
operating
activities,
as
defined
by
GAAP,
and
is
not
necessarily
indicative
of
cash
available
to
fund
Dream
Office
REIT’s
needs.
In
compliance
with
Canadian
Securities
Administrators
Staff
Notice
52-‐306
(Revised),
“Non-‐GAAP
Financial
Measures”,
FFO
has
been
reconciled
to
net
income
in
the
section
“Our
results
of
operations”
under
the
heading
“Funds
from
operations
and
adjusted
funds
from
operations”.
Adjusted
funds
from
operations
(“AFFO”)
Management
believes
AFFO
is
an
important
measure
of
our
economic
performance
and
is
indicative
of
our
ability
to
pay
distributions.
This
non-‐GAAP
measurement
is
commonly
used
for
assessing
real
estate
performance;
however,
it
does
not
represent
cash
generated
from
operating
activities,
as
defined
by
GAAP,
and
is
not
necessarily
indicative
of
cash
available
to
fund
Dream
Office
REIT’s
needs.
Our
calculation
of
AFFO
includes
a
deduction
for
an
estimated
amount
of
normalized
initial
direct
leasing
costs
and
lease
incentives
that
we
expect
to
incur
based
on
our
current
portfolio,
and
expected
average
leasing
activity.
Our
estimates
of
initial
direct
leasing
costs
and
lease
incentives
are
based
on
the
average
of
our
expected
leasing
activity
multiplied
by
the
average
cost
per
square
foot
that
we
incurred
and
committed
to
during
the
period,
adjusted
for
properties
that
have
been
acquired
or
sold.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
40
In
compliance
with
Canadian
Securities
Administrators
Staff
Notice
52-‐306
(Revised),
“Non-‐GAAP
Financial
Measures”,
AFFO
has
been
reconciled
to
cash
generated
from
operating
activities
in
this
section
under
the
heading
“Cash
generated
from
operating
activities
to
AFFO
reconciliation”.
NOI
NOI
is
defined
by
the
Trust
as
the
total
investment
property
revenue
less
investment
property
operating
expenses,
including
the
share
of
net
rental
income
from
investment
in
joint
ventures
and
property
management
income.
This
non-‐GAAP
measurement
is
an
important
measure
used
by
the
Trust
in
evaluating
property
operating
performance;
however,
it
is
not
defined
by
IFRS,
does
not
have
a
standard
meaning
and
may
not
be
comparable
with
similar
measures
presented
by
other
income
trusts.
In
compliance
with
Canadian
Securities
Administrators
Staff
Notice
52-‐306
(Revised),
“Non-‐GAAP
Financial
Measures”,
NOI
has
been
reconciled
to
net
rental
income
in
the
table
below:
Net
rental
income
(per
consolidated
financial
statements)
Add:
Share
of
net
rental
income
from
investments
in
joint
ventures
NOI
Less:
NOI
from
properties
sold
and
properties
held
for
sale
NOI
(excluding
properties
sold
and
properties
held
for
sale)
$
$
$
Three
months
ended
December
31,
2013
100,842
15,405
116,247
1,374
114,873
2014
98,758
15,413
114,171
7
114,164
$
Year
ended
December
31,
2014
401,508
60,442
461,950
3,106
458,844
$
$
2013
391,500
61,388
452,888
5,501
447,387
$
$
Comparative
properties
NOI
Comparative
properties
NOI
includes
NOI
of
same
properties
owned
by
the
Trust
in
the
current
and
prior
year
comparative
period
and
current
and
prior
year,
and
excludes
lease
termination
fees
and
property
one-‐time
adjustments,
NOI
of
acquired
properties
and
properties
held
for
redevelopment,
straight-‐line
rents,
bad
debt
expenses
and
amortization
of
lease
incentives.
Comparative
properties
NOI
is
an
important
non-‐GAAP
measure
used
by
management
to
evaluate
the
performance
of
the
same
properties
owned
by
the
Trust
in
the
current,
comparative
period
and
prior
quarter
as
presented.
This
non-‐GAAP
measure
is
not
defined
by
IFRS,
does
not
have
a
standard
meaning
and
may
not
be
comparable
with
similar
measures
presented
by
other
income
trusts.
Stabilized
NOI
Stabilized
NOI
for
an
individual
property
is
defined
by
the
Trust
as
investment
property
revenues
less
property
operating
expenses,
including
the
share
of
net
rental
income
from
investment
in
joint
ventures
and
property
management
income,
adjusted
for
items
such
as
average
lease
up
costs,
long-‐term
vacancy
rates,
non-‐recoverable
capital
expenditures,
management
fees,
straight-‐line
rents
and
other
non-‐recurring
items.
This
non-‐GAAP
measurement
is
an
important
measure
used
by
the
Trust
in
determining
the
fair
value
of
individual
investment
properties;
however,
it
is
not
defined
by
IFRS,
does
not
have
a
standard
meaning
and
may
not
be
comparable
with
similar
measures
presented
by
other
income
trusts.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
41
Weighted
average
number
of
units
The
basic
weighted
average
number
of
units
outstanding
used
in
the
FFO
and
AFFO
per
unit
calculations
includes
the
weighted
average
number
of
all
REIT
Units,
LP
B
Units,
and
vested
but
unissued
deferred
trust
units
and
income
deferred
trust
units.
The
diluted
weighted
average
number
of
units
for
the
three
months
and
year
ended
December
31,
2014
assumes
the
conversion
of
the
5.5%
Series
H
Debentures,
as
they
are
dilutive.
Diluted
FFO
per
unit
for
the
three
and
twelve
months
ended
December
31,
2014
excludes
$0.7
million
and
$2.8
million,
respectively,
in
interest
related
to
convertible
debentures
(for
the
three
and
twelve
months
ended
December
31,
2013
–
$0.7
million
and
$2.9
million,
respectively).
Weighted
average
units
outstanding
for
basic
per
unit
amounts
(in
thousands)
Weighted
average
units
outstanding
for
diluted
per
unit
amounts
(in
thousands)
Three
months
ended
December
31,
Year
ended
December
31,
2014
2013
2014
2013
109,232
108,082
108,484
106,164
110,849
109,691
110,100
107,773
Adjusted
cash
flows
from
operating
activities
When
the
Trust
determines
its
cash
available
for
distribution,
it
uses
adjusted
cash
flows
from
operating
activities
which
includes
cash
flows
from
operating
activities
of
our
investments
in
joint
ventures
that
are
equity
accounted
and
excludes
fluctuations
in
working
capital,
transaction
costs
on
business
combinations
and
investment
in
lease
incentives
and
initial
direct
leasing
costs.
The
Trust
funds
its
working
capital
needs
and
investments
in
lease
incentives
and
initial
direct
leasing
costs
with
cash
and
cash
equivalent
on
hand
and
our
credit
facilities.
Accordingly,
management
believes
adjusted
cash
flows
from
operating
activities
is
an
important
measure
that
reflects
our
ability
to
pay
cash
distributions.
This
non-‐GAAP
measurement
does
not
represent
cash
generated
from
(utilized
in)
operating
activities
(as
per
consolidated
financial
statements),
as
defined
by
GAAP.
Cash
flows
from
operating
activities
(including
investments
in
joint
ventures)
When
the
Trust
determines
its
cash
available
for
distribution,
it
uses
adjusted
cash
flows
from
operating
activities.
One
of
the
components
of
adjusted
cash
flows
from
operating
activities
is
cash
flows
from
operating
activities
of
our
investments
in
joint
ventures
that
are
equity
accounted.
Management
believes
it
is
important
to
include
cash
flows
from
operating
activities
of
our
investments
in
joint
ventures
that
are
equity
accounted
as
it
forms
part
of
the
Trust’s
determination
of
its
cash
available
for
distribution.
This
non-‐GAAP
measurement
does
not
represent
cash
generated
from
(utilized
in)
operating
activities
(as
per
consolidated
financial
statements),
as
defined
by
GAAP.
Investment
in
joint
ventures
The
Trust’s
proportionate
share
of
the
financial
position
and
results
of
operations
of
its
investment
in
joint
ventures,
which
are
accounted
for
using
the
equity
method
in
the
consolidated
financial
statements
and
as
presented
and
discussed
throughout
the
MD&A
using
the
proportionate
consolidation
method,
are
non-‐GAAP
measures.
A
reconciliation
of
the
financial
position
and
results
of
operations
to
the
consolidated
balance
sheets
and
consolidated
statements
of
comprehensive
income
is
included
in
the
following
tables.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
42
Balance
sheet
reconciliation
to
consolidated
financial
statements
December
31,
2014
December
31,
2013
Amounts
per
consolidated
financial
statements
Share
from
investment
in
joint
ventures
Amounts
per
consolidated
financial
statements
Share
from
investment
in
joint
ventures
Total
$
6,139,070
191,691
553,141
106,803
6,990,705
$
$
1,062,776
-‐
(553,141)
8,507
518,142
$
$
16,565
8,593
10,920
36,078
2,968
7,029,751
2,731,506
15,151
17,082
6,183
18,935
2,788,857
$
$
682
351
9,969
11,002
-‐
529,144
484,905
-‐
-‐
-‐
378
485,283
$
$
7,201,846
191,691
-‐
115,310
7,508,847
17,247
8,944
20,889
47,080
2,968
7,558,895
3,216,411
15,151
17,082
6,183
19,313
3,274,140
$
$
$
6,241,685
166,317
527,255
104,822
7,040,079
28,476
9,450
31,017
68,943
15,921
7,124,943
2,884,481
101,978
18,535
5,167
18,867
3,029,028
$
$
1,061,436
-‐
(527,255)
2,804
536,985
$
$
2,520
432
2,862
5,814
-‐
542,799
496,410
-‐
-‐
-‐
235
496,645
$
$
Total
7,303,121
166,317
-‐
107,626
7,577,064
30,996
9,882
33,879
74,757
15,921
7,667,742
3,380,891
101,978
18,535
5,167
19,102
3,525,673
365,855
12,075
377,930
264,535
11,678
276,213
97,522
463,377
3,252,234
$
$
31,786
43,861
529,144
129,308
507,238
3,781,378
$
108,242
372,777
3,401,805
$
$
34,476
46,154
542,799
142,718
418,931
3,944,604
$
Assets
NON-‐CURRENT
ASSETS
Investment
properties
Investment
in
Dream
Industrial
REIT
Investment
in
joint
ventures
Other
non-‐current
assets
CURRENT
ASSETS
Amounts
receivable
Prepaid
expenses
and
other
assets
Cash
and
cash
equivalents
Assets
held
for
sale
Total
assets
Liabilities
NON-‐CURRENT
LIABILITIES
Debt
Subsidiary
redeemable
units
Deferred
Unit
Incentive
Plan
Deferred
tax
liabilities,
net
Other
non-‐current
liabilities
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
Debt
Amounts
payable
and
accrued
liabilities
Total
liabilities
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
43
Statement
of
comprehensive
income
to
consolidated
financial
statements
2014
Three
months
ended
December
31,
2013
Amounts
included
in
consolidated
Share
of
income
from
Amounts
included
in
consolidated
Share
of
income
from
financial
investment
in
financial
investment
in
Investment
properties
revenue
Investment
properties
operating
expenses
Net
rental
income
$
Other
income
Share
of
net
income
and
dilution
gain
(loss)
from
investment
in
Dream
Industrial
REIT
Share
of
net
income
from
investment
in
joint
ventures
Interest
and
fee
income
Other
expenses
General
and
administrative
Interest:
Debt
Subsidiary
redeemable
units
Amortization
of
external
management
contracts
and
depreciation
on
property
and
equipment
Fair
value
adjustments,
net
gains
(losses)
on
transactions
and
other
activities
Fair
value
adjustments
to
investment
properties
Fair
value
adjustments
to
financial
instruments
Net
gains
(losses)
on
transactions
and
other
activities
Income
before
income
taxes
Deferred
income
tax
recovery
(expense)
Net
income
for
the
period
Other
comprehensive
income
(loss)
Unrealized
loss
on
interest
rate
swaps
Unrealized
foreign
currency
translation
gain
Comprehensive
income
for
the
period
$
statements
176,460
$
(77,702)
98,758
joint
ventures
Total
28,726
$
205,186
$
(13,313)
15,413
(91,015)
114,171
statements
179,574
$
(78,732)
100,842
joint
ventures
Total
28,844
$
208,418
(92,171)
(13,439)
116,247
15,405
3,699
-‐
3,699
3,027
-‐
3,027
10,343
908
14,950
(10,343)
-‐
(10,343)
-‐
908
4,607
5,415
938
9,380
(5,415)
4
(5,411)
-‐
942
3,969
(5,879)
(3)
(5,882)
(6,155)
-‐
(6,155)
(33,091)
(338)
(4,734)
-‐
(37,825)
(338)
(33,857)
(1,981)
(4,508)
-‐
(38,365)
(1,981)
(800)
(40,108)
-‐
(4,737)
(800)
(44,845)
(691)
(42,684)
(2)
(4,510)
(693)
(47,194)
(67,100)
2,689
(1,583)
(65,994)
7,606
(300)
7,306
(200)
-‐
(67,300)
2,689
(7,143)
251
(5,484)
-‐
(12,627)
251
(133)
(333)
-‐
-‐
-‐
(1,716)
(66,327)
7,606
(300)
7,306
(1,755)
(8,647)
58,891
865
59,756
-‐
(5,484)
-‐
-‐
-‐
(1,755)
(14,131)
58,891
865
59,756
(323)
1,675
1,352
8,658
$
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
$
(323)
1,675
1,352
8,658
$
(480)
1,085
605
60,361
$
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
$
(480)
1,085
605
60,361
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
44
2014
Year
ended
December
31,
2013
Amounts
per
consolidated
Share
of
income
from
financial
investment
in
Amounts
per
Share
of
consolidated
income
from
financial
investment
in
statements
705,279
(303,771)
401,508
$
joint
ventures
112,716
(52,274)
60,442
$
Total
$
817,995
(356,045)
461,950
statements
687,172
(295,672)
391,500
$
joint
ventures
113,359
(51,971)
61,388
$
Total
800,531
(347,643)
452,888
15,965
37,611
3,199
56,775
-‐
15,965
15,697
-‐
15,697
(37,611)
35
(37,576)
-‐
3,234
84,382
4,635
19,199
104,714
(84,382)
55
(84,327)
-‐
4,690
20,387
(24,393)
(3)
(24,396)
(23,859)
(202)
(24,061)
(134,952)
(4,638)
(17,725)
-‐
(152,677)
(4,638)
(130,169)
(7,897)
(18,200)
-‐
(148,369)
(7,897)
(2,970)
(166,953)
-‐
(17,728)
(2,970)
(184,681)
(2,527)
(164,452)
(4)
(18,406)
(2,531)
(182,858)
(124,303)
2,749
(4,153)
-‐
(128,456)
2,749
85,745
34,840
41,708
-‐
127,453
34,840
(9,848)
(131,402)
159,928
(638)
159,290
(666)
3,210
2,544
161,834
$
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
(985)
(5,138)
(10,833)
(136,540)
159,928
113,593
445,355
(6,992)
(363)
41,345
-‐
-‐
-‐
(7,355)
154,938
445,355
(344)
445,011
(638)
(344)
159,290
445,011
(666)
3,210
2,544
161,834
$
39
1,942
1,981
446,992
$
$
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
$
39
1,942
1,981
446,992
Investment
properties
revenue
Investment
properties
operating
expenses
Net
rental
income
$
Other
income
Share
of
net
income
and
dilution
gain
(loss)
from
investment
in
Dream
Industrial
REIT
Share
of
net
income
from
investment
in
joint
ventures
Interest
and
fee
income
Other
expenses
General
and
administrative
Interest:
Debt
Subsidiary
redeemable
units
Amortization
of
external
management
contracts
and
depreciation
on
property
and
equipment
Fair
value
adjustments,
net
gains
(losses)
on
transactions
and
other
activities
Fair
value
adjustments
to
investment
properties
Fair
value
adjustments
to
financial
instruments
Net
gains
(losses)
on
transactions
and
other
activities
Income
before
income
taxes
Deferred
income
taxes
Net
income
for
the
year
Other
comprehensive
income
(loss)
Unrealized
gain
(loss)
on
interest
rate
swap
Unrealized
foreign
currency
translation
gain
Comprehensive
income
for
the
year
$
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
45
Cash
generated
from
operating
activities
to
AFFO
reconciliation
In
compliance
with
Canadian
Securities
Administrators
Staff
Notice
52-‐306
(Revised),
“Non-‐GAAP
Financial
Measures”,
the
table
below
reconciles
AFFO
to
cash
generated
from
(utilized
in)
operating
activities.
Cash
generated
from
(utilized
in)
operating
activities
Add
(deduct):
Share
of
AFFO
from
investment
in
Dream
Industrial
REIT
Share
of
net
income
from
investment
in
joint
ventures
Initial
direct
leasing
costs
and
lease
incentives
Amortization
of
deferred
financing
costs
Internal
leasing
costs
Business
transformation
costs
Change
in
non-‐cash
working
capital
Adjustments
for
investment
in
joint
ventures:
Fair
value
adjustments
to
investment
properties
Straight-‐line
rent
Amortization
of
lease
incentives
Internal
leasing
costs
Loss
on
sale
of
investment
properties
Normalized
initial
direct
leasing
costs
and
lease
incentives
Other
AFFO
Three
months
ended
December
31,
Year
ended
December
31,
2014
$
55,103
$
2013
64,081
$
2014
203,354
$
2013
195,237
3,767
10,343
18,295
(786)
625
275
(11,039)
200
(174)
57
133
-‐
(8,130)
(99)
$
68,570
$
3,116
5,415
5,489
(820)
1,755
-‐
(6,815)
5,484
170
30
-‐
-‐
(8,005)
(2,916)
66,984
$
13,511
37,611
49,116
(3,178)
6,118
1,100
(5,648)
4,153
(683)
59
227
758
(32,568)
(870)
273,060
$
12,052
84,382
31,034
(3,034)
6,468
-‐
9,066
(41,708)
648
328
363
-‐
(31,428)
(1,632)
261,776
Cash
flows
from
operating
activities
and
distributions
declared
In
any
given
period,
actual
distributions
declared
may
differ
from
cash
generated
from
(utilized
in)
operating
activities,
primarily
due
to
seasonal
fluctuations
in
non-‐cash
working
capital
and
the
impact
of
leasing
costs,
which
fluctuate
with
lease
maturities,
renewal
terms
and
the
type
of
asset
being
leased.
These
seasonal
or
short-‐term
fluctuations
are
funded
with
our
cash
and
cash
equivalents
on
hand
and,
if
necessary,
with
our
existing
credit
facilities.
The
Trust
determines
the
distribution
rate
by,
among
other
considerations,
its
assessment
of
cash
flow
as
determined
using
adjusted
cash
flows
from
operating
activities
(a
non-‐
GAAP
measure),
which
includes
cash
flows
from
operating
activities
of
our
investments
in
joint
ventures
that
are
equity
accounted
and
excludes
the
fluctuations
in
non-‐cash
working
capital,
transaction
costs
on
business
combinations,
and
investment
in
lease
incentives
and
initial
direct
leasing
costs.
As
such,
the
Trust
believes
the
cash
distributions
are
not
an
economic
return
of
capital,
but
a
distribution
of
sustainable
adjusted
cash
flow
from
operating
activities.
Based
on
current
facts
and
assumptions,
the
Trust
does
not
anticipate
cash
distributions
will
be
reduced
or
suspended
in
the
foreseeable
future.
In
any
given
period,
the
Trust
anticipates
that
actual
distributions
declared
will,
in
the
foreseeable
future,
continue
to
vary
from
net
income
as
net
income
includes
non-‐cash
items
such
as
fair
value
adjustments
to
investment
properties
and
fair
value
adjustments
to
financial
instruments.
Accordingly,
the
Trust
does
not
use
net
income
as
a
proxy
for
distributions.
As
required
by
National
Policy
41-‐201,
“Income
Trusts
and
Other
Indirect
Offerings”,
the
following
table
outlines
the
differences
between
cash
generated
from
(utilized
in)
operating
activities
(per
consolidated
financial
statements)
and
distributions
declared,
as
well
as
the
differences
between
net
income
and
distributions
declared,
in
accordance
with
the
guidelines.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
46
When
the
Trust
determines
its
cash
available
for
distribution,
it
uses
adjusted
cash
flows
from
operating
activities
(a
non-‐GAAP
measure)
which
includes
cash
flows
from
operating
activities
of
our
investments
in
joint
ventures
that
are
equity
accounted
and
excludes
fluctuations
in
working
capital,
transaction
costs
on
business
combinations
and
investment
in
lease
incentives
and
initial
direct
leasing
costs.
Accordingly,
the
following
table
also
outlines
the
differences
between
adjusted
cash
flow
from
operating
activities
and
distributions
declared.
Net
income
$
Cash
generated
from
(utilized
in)
operating
activities
(per
Three
months
ended
December
31,
2013(1)
59,756
$
2014
7,306
$
Year
ended
December
31,
2013(1)
2014
445,011
159,290
$
consolidated
financial
statements)
55,103
64,081
203,354
195,237
Add:
Investment
in
joint
venturesʼ
cash
flows
from
operating
activities
3,091
2,392
37,596
38,861
Cash
flows
from
operating
activities
(including
investment
in
joint
ventures)
Add
(deduct):
Investment
in
lease
incentives
and
initial
direct
leasing
costs
Change
in
non-‐cash
working
capital
Adjusted
cash
flows
from
operating
activities
Distributions
declared
Adjusted
cash
flows
from
operating
activities
over
distributions
declared
58,194
66,473
240,950
234,098
18,645
(4,019)
72,820
62,622
5,027
1,157
72,657
59,989
51,001
(3,147)
288,804
242,220
29,180
12,204
275,482
235,751
10,198
12,668
46,584
39,731
Excess
(shortfall)
of
net
income
over
distributions
declared
Excess
(shortfall)
of
cash
generated
from
(utilized
in)
operating
activities
(per
consolidated
financial
statements)
(7,519)
over
distributions
declared
(1)
Comparative
figures
have
been
reclassified
to
conform
to
the
current
period
presentation.
(55,316)
$
(233)
(82,930)
209,260
$
4,092
$
(38,866)
$
(40,514)
For
the
three
and
twelve
months
ended
December
31,
2014,
adjusted
cash
flows
from
operating
activities
exceeded
distributions
declared
by
$10.2
million
and
$46.6
million,
respectively
(for
the
three
and
twelve
months
ended
December
31,
2013
–
$12.7
million
and
$39.7
million,
respectively).
For
the
three
and
twelve
months
ended
December
31,
2014,
actual
distributions
declared
exceeded
cash
generated
from
(utilized
in)
operating
activities
(per
consolidated
financial
statements)
by
$7.5
million
and
$38.9
million,
respectively.
The
shortfall
of
cash
generated
from
(utilized
in)
operating
activities
over
distributions
declared
is
mainly
due
to
the
fact
that
cash
flows
from
operating
activities
of
our
investments
in
joint
ventures
that
are
equity
accounted
are
excluded
from
this
calculation
despite
the
fact
that
it
forms
part
of
the
Trust’s
determination
of
its
cash
available
for
distribution.
For
the
three
and
twelve
months
ended
December
31,
2014,
actual
distributions
declared
exceeded
cash
flows
from
operating
activities
(including
investment
in
joint
ventures)
by
$4.4
million
and
$1.3
million,
respectively.
This
shortfall
was
mainly
driven
by
the
short-‐term
fluctuations
in
our
investment
in
lease
incentives
and
initial
direct
leasing
costs
incurred
for
the
three
months
ended
December
31,
2014,
from
$11.9
million
at
September
30,
2014
to
$18.6
million
at
December
31,
2014.
These
investments
were
funded
by
cash
and
cash
equivalents
and
our
existing
credit
facilities.
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013,
actual
distributions
declared
exceeded
cash
flows
from
operating
activities
(including
investment
in
joint
ventures)
by
$1.7
million.
This
shortfall
was
mainly
driven
by
the
short-‐term
fluctuations
in
our
investment
in
lease
incentives
and
initial
direct
leasing
costs
incurred
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013.
These
investments
were
funded
by
cash
and
cash
equivalents
and
our
existing
credit
facilities.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
47
Of
the
distributions
declared
for
the
three
and
twelve
months
ended
December
31,
2014,
$17.9
million
and
$61.7
million,
respectively,
were
reinvested
in
units
pursuant
to
the
DRIP.
Cash
generated
from
(utilized
in)
operating
activities
exceeded
actual
distributions
declared
(excluding
the
amount
reinvested
in
units
pursuant
to
the
DRIP)
by
$10.4
million
and
$22.8
million,
respectively.
Over
time,
reinvestments
pursuant
to
the
DRIP
will
increase
the
number
of
units
outstanding
which
may
result
in
upward
pressure
on
the
total
amount
of
cash
distributions.
Our
Declaration
of
Trust
provides
our
trustees
with
the
discretion
to
determine
the
percentage
payout
of
income
that
would
be
in
the
best
interest
of
the
Trust,
which
allows
for
any
unforeseen
expenditures
and
the
variability
in
cash
distributions
as
a
result
of
additional
units
issued
pursuant
to
the
Trust’s
DRIP.
Accordingly,
the
Trust
believes
this
does
not
constitute
an
economic
return
of
capital.
For
the
three
and
twelve
months
ended
December
31,
2014,
distributions
declared
exceeded
net
income
by
$55.3
million
and
$82.9
million,
respectively,
primarily
due
to
non-‐cash
components
of
net
income,
which
include
the
fair
value
adjustments
to
investment
properties
of
$67.1
million
and
$124.3
million,
respectively,
and
fair
value
adjustments
to
financial
instruments
of
$2.7
million
for
the
three
and
twelve
months
ended
December
31,
2014.
For
the
three
months
ended
December
31,
2013,
distributions
declared
exceeded
net
income
by
$0.2
million,
primarily
due
to
non-‐cash
components
of
net
income,
which
include
the
fair
value
loss
to
investment
properties
of
$12.6
million,
and
fair
value
gain
to
financial
instruments
of
$0.3
million
for
the
three
months
ended
December
31,
2013.
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013,
net
income
exceeded
distributions
declared
by
$209.3
million,
primarily
due
to
non-‐cash
components
of
net
income,
which
include
the
fair
value
gain
to
investment
properties
of
$127.5
million,
and
fair
value
gain
to
financial
instruments
of
$34.8
million
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013.
Level
of
debt
(net
total
debt-‐to-‐gross
book
value
and
net
secured
debt-‐to-‐gross
book
value)
Management
believes
these
non-‐GAAP
measurements
are
important
measures
in
the
management
of
our
debt
levels.
Net
total
debt-‐to-‐gross
book
value
as
shown
below
is
determined
as
total
debt
(net
of
cash
on
hand),
which
includes
debt
related
to
investment
in
joint
ventures
that
are
equity
accounted
and
debt
related
to
assets
held
for
sale,
divided
by
total
assets.
Net
secured
debt-‐to-‐gross
book
value
as
shown
below
is
determined
as
secured
debt
(net
of
unsecured
debt
and
cash
on
hand),
which
includes
debt
related
to
investment
in
joint
ventures
that
are
equity
accounted
and
debt
related
to
assets
held
for
sale,
divided
by
total
assets.
Total
assets
include
assets
of
investment
in
joint
ventures
that
are
equity
accounted
and
the
reversal
of
accumulated
depreciation
of
property
and
equipment
and
cash
on
hand.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
48
In
compliance
with
Canadian
Securities
Administrators
Staff
Notice
52-‐306
(Revised),
“Non-‐GAAP
Financial
Measures”,
the
following
tables
calculate
the
level
of
debt
(net
total
debt-‐to-‐gross
book
value
and
net
secured
debt-‐to-‐gross
book
value)
as
at
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013.
As
at
December
31,
2014
$
Non-‐current
debt
Current
debt
Debt
before
undernoted
items
Less:
Cash
on
hand(1)
Total
debt
(net
of
cash
on
hand)
Less:
Unsecured
debt
Total
secured
debt
(net
of
cash
on
hand)
Total
assets
Add:
Accumulated
depreciation
of
property
and
equipment
Less:
Cash
on
hand(1)
Total
assets
(excluding
accumulated
depreciation
of
property
Amounts
per
consolidated
financial
statements
Share
of
amounts
from
investment
in
joint
ventures
2,731,506
$
365,855
3,097,361
(5,466)
3,091,895
(533,860)
2,558,035
7,029,751(2)
4,813
(5,466)
484,905
$
12,075
496,980
-‐
496,980
-‐
496,980
529,144
-‐
-‐
and
equipment
and
cash
on
hand)
$
7,029,098
$
529,144
$
Net
total
debt-‐to-‐gross
book
value
Net
secured
debt-‐to-‐gross
book
value
(1)
Cash
on
hand
represents
cash
at
period-‐end,
excluding
cash
held
in
joint
ventures
and
co-‐owned
properties.
(2)
Includes
net
assets
of
investment
in
joint
ventures
that
are
equity
accounted.
Total
3,216,411
377,930
3,594,341
(5,466)
3,588,875
(533,860)
3,055,015
7,558,895(3)
4,813
(5,466)
7,558,242
47.5%
40.4%
(3)
Total
assets
are
determined
as
total
assets,
including
assets
related
to
investment
in
joint
ventures
that
are
equity
accounted
and
assets
held
for
sale.
As
at
December
31,
2013
Amounts
per
consolidated
financial
statements
Share
of
amounts
from
investment
in
joint
ventures
$
Non-‐current
debt
Current
debt
Debt
before
undernoted
items
Add:
Debt
related
to
assets
held
for
sale
Less:
Cash
on
hand(1)
Total
debt
(net
of
cash
on
hand)
Less:
Unsecured
debt
Total
secured
debt
(net
of
cash
on
hand)
Total
assets
Add:
Accumulated
depreciation
of
property
and
equipment
Less:
Cash
on
hand(1)
Total
assets
(excluding
accumulated
depreciation
of
property
and
equipment
and
cash
on
hand)
Net
total
debt-‐to-‐gross
book
value
Net
secured
debt-‐to-‐gross
book
value
(1)
Cash
on
hand
represents
cash
at
year-‐end,
excluding
cash
held
in
joint
ventures
and
co-‐owned
properties.
2,884,481
264,535
3,149,016
-‐
(23,436)
3,125,580
(385,532)
2,740,048
7,124,943(2)
3,135
(23,436)
7,104,642
$
$
496,410
$
11,678
508,088
5,439
-‐
513,527
-‐
513,527
542,799
-‐
-‐
$
542,799
$
Total
3,380,891
276,213
3,657,104
5,439
(23,436)
3,639,107
(385,532)
3,253,575
7,667,742(3)
3,135
(23,436)
7,647,441
47.6%
42.5%
(2)
Includes
net
assets
of
investment
in
joint
ventures
that
are
equity
accounted.
(3)
Total
assets
are
determined
as
total
assets,
including
assets
related
to
investment
in
joint
ventures
that
are
equity
accounted
and
assets
held
for
sale.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
49
Interest
coverage
ratio
Management
believes
this
non-‐GAAP
measurement
is
an
important
measure
in
determining
our
ability
to
cover
interest
expense
based
on
our
operating
performance.
Interest
coverage
ratio
for
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013
includes
the
results
from
investment
in
joint
ventures
that
are
equity
accounted.
Interest
coverage
ratio
as
shown
below
is
calculated
as
net
rental
income
plus
interest
and
fee
income,
less
general
and
administrative
expenses,
all
divided
by
interest
expense
on
total
debt.
In
compliance
with
Canadian
Securities
Administrators
Staff
Notice
52-‐306
(Revised),
“Non-‐GAAP
Financial
Measures”,
the
following
tables
calculate
the
interest
coverage
ratio
for
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013.
Net
rental
income
Add:
Interest
and
fee
income
Less:
General
and
administrative
expenses
Total
Interest
expense
–
debt
Interest
coverage
ratio
(times)
Net
rental
income
Add:
Interest
and
fee
income
Less:
General
and
administrative
expenses
Total
Interest
expense
–
debt
Interest
coverage
ratio
(times)
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
Amounts
per
consolidated
financial
statements
Share
of
amounts
from
investment
in
joint
ventures
401,508
$
3,199
(24,393)
380,314
134,952
$
60,442
$
35
(3)
60,474
17,725
$
Total
461,950
3,234
(24,396)
440,788
152,677
2.9
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013
Amounts
per
consolidated
financial
statements
Share
of
amounts
from
investment
in
joint
ventures
391,500
$
4,635
(23,859)
372,276
130,169
$
61,388
$
55
(202)
61,241
18,200
$
Total
452,888
4,690
(24,061)
433,517
148,369
2.9
$
$
$
$
Net
average
debt-‐to-‐EBITDFV
Management
believes
this
non-‐GAAP
measurement
is
an
important
measure
in
determining
the
time
it
takes
the
Trust,
based
on
its
historical
operating
performance,
to
repay
our
average
debt.
Net
average
debt-‐to-‐EBITDFV
as
shown
below
is
calculated
as
total
average
debt
(net
of
cash
on
hand),
which
includes
debt
related
to
investment
in
joint
ventures
that
are
equity
accounted
and
debt
related
to
assets
held
for
sale,
divided
by
annualized
EBITDFV
for
the
current
quarter.
EBITDFV
–
annualized
is
calculated
as
net
income
for
the
period
adjusted
for:
lease
termination
fees
and
other,
non-‐cash
items
included
in
investment
properties
revenue,
fair
value
adjustments
to
investment
properties
and
financial
instruments,
share
of
net
income
and
dilution
gain
(loss)
from
Dream
Industrial
REIT,
distributions
received
from
Dream
Industrial
REIT,
interest
expense,
depreciation
and
amortization,
net
gains
(losses)
on
transactions
and
other
activities,
and
income
taxes.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
50
Net
debt-‐to-‐adjusted
EBITDFV
Management
believes
this
non-‐GAAP
measurement
is
an
important
measure
in
determining
the
time
it
takes
the
Trust,
on
a
go
forward
basis,
based
on
its
normalized
operating
performance,
to
repay
our
debt.
Net
debt-‐to-‐adjusted
EBITDFV
as
shown
below
is
calculated
as
total
debt
(net
of
cash
on
hand),
which
includes
debt
related
to
investment
in
joint
ventures
that
are
equity
accounted
and
debt
related
to
assets
held
for
sale,
divided
by
adjusted
EBITDFV
–
annualized.
Adjusted
EBITDFV
–
annualized
is
calculated
as
EBITDFV
–
annualized
plus
normalized
NOI
of
acquired
properties
for
the
quarter.
In
compliance
with
Canadian
Securities
Administrators
Staff
Notice
52-‐306
(Revised),
“Non-‐GAAP
Financial
Measures”,
the
following
tables
calculate
the
annualized
net
average
debt-‐to-‐EBITDFV
and
annualized
net
debt-‐to-‐adjusted
EBITDFV
for
the
periods
ended
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013.
Amounts
included
Share
of
amounts
December
31,
2014
$
$
$
Non-‐current
debt
Current
debt
Debt
before
undernoted
items
Less:
Weighted
average
debt
adjustment(1)
Less:
Cash
on
hand(2)
Total
weighted
average
debt
(net
of
cash
on
hand)
Add-‐back:
Weighted
average
debt
adjustment(1)
Total
debt
(net
of
cash
on
hand)
Net
income
(loss)
for
the
period
Lease
termination
fees
and
other
Non-‐cash
items
included
in
investment
properties
revenue(3)
Fair
value
adjustments
to
investment
properties
Fair
value
adjustments
to
financial
instruments
Share
of
net
income
and
dilution
gain
(loss)
from
Dream
Industrial
REIT
Distributions
received
from
Dream
Industrial
REIT
Interest
–
debt
Interest
–
subsidiary
redeemable
units
Amortization
of
external
management
contracts
and
in
consolidated
financial
statements
2,731,506
$
365,855
3,097,361
(41,386)
(5,466)
3,050,509
$
41,386
3,091,895
$
(3,037)
(546)
2,065
67,100
(2,689)
(3,699)
3,247
33,091
338
from
investment
in
joint
ventures
484,905
$
12,075
496,980
-‐
-‐
496,980
$
-‐
496,980
$
10,343
-‐
(117)
200
-‐
-‐
-‐
4,734
-‐
depreciation
on
property
and
equipment
Net
loss
on
transactions
and
other
activities
Deferred
income
taxes
EBITDFV
–
quarterly
Normalized
NOI
of
acquired
properties
for
the
quarter
Adjusted
EBITDFV
–
quarterly
EBITDFV
–
annualized
Adjusted
EBITDFV
–
annualized
Net
average
debt-‐to-‐EBITDFV
(years)
Net
debt-‐to-‐adjusted
EBITDFV
(years)
(1)
Weighted
average
debt
adjustment
reflects
outstanding
debt
at
period-‐end,
pro-‐rated
for
the
number
of
days
outstanding
during
the
period.
-‐
133
-‐
15,293
$
800
1,583
300
98,553
$
15,293
$
$
$
98,553
$
-‐
-‐
$
$
Total
3,216,411
377,930
3,594,341
(41,386)
(5,466)
3,547,489
41,386
3,588,875
7,306
(546)
1,948
67,300
(2,689)
(3,699)
3,247
37,825
338
800
1,716
300
113,846
-‐
113,846
455,384
455,384
7.8
7.9
(2)
Cash
on
hand
represents
cash
at
period-‐end,
excluding
cash
held
in
joint
ventures
and
co-‐owned
properties.
(3)
Includes
adjustments
for
straight-‐line
rent
and
amortization
of
lease
incentives.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
51
December
31,
2013
Amounts
included
Share
of
amounts
in
consolidated
from
investment
financial
statements
in
joint
ventures
$
$
$
-‐
5,249
513,527
$
496,410
$
11,678
508,088
5,439
-‐
-‐
2,884,481
$
264,535
3,149,016
-‐
(5,249)
(23,436)
3,120,331
$
Non-‐current
debt
Current
debt
Debt
before
undernoted
items
Add:
Debt
related
to
assets
held
for
sale
Less:
Weighted
average
debt
adjustment(1)
Less:
Cash
on
hand(2)
Total
weighted
average
debt
(net
of
cash
on
hand)
Add-‐back:
Weighted
average
debt
adjustment(1)
Total
debt
(net
of
cash
on
hand)
Net
income
for
the
period
Lease
termination
fees
and
other
Non-‐cash
items
included
in
investment
properties
revenue(3)
Fair
value
adjustments
to
investment
properties
Fair
value
adjustments
to
financial
instruments
Share
of
net
income
and
dilution
gain
(loss)
from
Dream
Industrial
REIT
Distributions
received
from
Dream
Industrial
REIT
Interest
–
debt
Interest
–
subsidiary
redeemable
units
Amortization
of
external
management
contracts
and
depreciation
on
property
and
equipment
Net
loss
on
transactions
and
other
activities
Deferred
income
taxes
recovery
EBITDFV
–
quarterly
Normalized
NOI
of
acquired
properties
for
the
quarter
Adjusted
EBITDFV
–
quarterly
EBITDFV
–
annualized
Adjusted
EBITDFV
–
annualized
Net
average
debt-‐to-‐EBITDFV
(years)
Net
debt-‐to-‐adjusted
EBITDFV
(years)
(1)
Weighted
average
debt
adjustment
reflects
outstanding
debt
at
period-‐end,
pro-‐rated
for
the
number
of
days
outstanding
during
the
period.
3,125,580
$
54,341
(621)
(127)
7,208
(253)
(3,027)
2,849
33,857
1,981
513,527
$
5,415
-‐
200
5,419
-‐
-‐
-‐
4,508
-‐
691
1,690
(865)
97,724
$
15,609
$
$
$
2
65
-‐
97,822
$
15,609
$
98
-‐
$
$
Total
3,380,891
276,213
3,657,104
5,439
(5,249)
(23,436)
3,633,858
5,249
3,639,107
59,756
(621)
73
12,627
(253)
(3,027)
2,849
38,365
1,981
693
1,755
(865)
113,333
98
113,431
453,332
453,724
8.0
8.0
(2)
Cash
on
hand
represents
cash
at
year-‐end,
excluding
cash
held
in
joint
ventures
and
co-‐owned
properties.
(3)
Includes
adjustments
for
straight-‐line
rent
and
amortization
of
lease
incentives.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
52
SECTION
III
–
DISCLOSURE
CONTROLS
AND
PROCEDURES
At
December
31,
2014,
financial
year-‐end,
the
Chief
Executive
Officer
and
the
Chief
Financial
Officer
(the
“Certifying
Officers”),
together
with
other
members
of
management,
have
evaluated
the
design
and
operational
effectiveness
of
Dream
Office
REIT’s
disclosure
controls
and
procedures,
as
defined
in
National
Instrument
52-‐109
–
Certification
of
Disclosure
in
Issuers’
Annual
and
Interim
Filings
(“NI
52-‐109”).
The
Certifying
Officers
have
concluded
that
the
disclosure
controls
and
procedures
are
adequate
and
effective
in
order
to
provide
reasonable
assurance
that
material
information
has
been
accumulated
and
communicated
to
management,
to
allow
timely
decisions
of
required
disclosures
by
Dream
Office
REIT
and
its
consolidated
subsidiary
entities,
within
the
required
time
periods.
Dream
Office
REIT’s
internal
control
over
financial
reporting
(as
defined
in
NI
52-‐109)
is
designed
to
provide
reasonable
assurance
regarding
the
reliability
of
financial
reporting
and
the
preparation
of
consolidated
financial
statements
for
external
purposes
in
accordance
with
IFRS.
Using
the
framework
established
in
“Risk
Management
and
Governance:
Guidance
on
Control
(COCO
Framework)”,
published
by
the
Chartered
Professional
Accountants
Canada,
the
Certifying
Officers,
together
with
other
members
of
management,
have
evaluated
the
design
and
operation
of
Dream
Office
REIT’s
internal
control
over
financial
reporting.
Based
on
that
evaluation,
the
Certifying
Officers
have
concluded
that
Dream
Office
REIT’s
internal
control
over
financial
reporting
was
effective
as
at
December
31,
2014.
There
were
no
changes
in
Dream
Office
REIT’s
internal
control
over
financial
reporting
during
the
financial
year
ended
December
31,
2014
that
have
materially
affected,
or
are
reasonably
likely
to
materially
affect,
Dream
Office
REIT’s
internal
control
over
financial
reporting.
SECTION
IV
–
RISKS
AND
OUR
STRATEGY
TO
MANAGE
Dream
Office
REIT
is
exposed
to
various
risks
and
uncertainties,
many
of
which
are
beyond
our
control.
For
a
full
list
and
explanation
of
our
risks
and
uncertainties,
please
refer
to
our
2013
Annual
Report
or
our
Annual
Information
Form
dated
March
31,
2014,
filed
on
SEDAR
(www.sedar.com).
REAL
ESTATE
OWNERSHIP
Real
estate
ownership
is
generally
subject
to
numerous
factors
and
risks,
including
changes
in
general
economic
conditions
(such
as
the
availability,
terms
and
cost
of
mortgage
financings
and
other
types
of
credit),
local
economic
conditions
(such
as
an
oversupply
of
office
and
other
commercial
properties
or
a
reduction
in
demand
for
real
estate
in
the
area),
the
attractiveness
of
properties
to
potential
tenants
or
purchasers,
competition
with
other
landlords
with
similar
available
space,
and
the
ability
of
the
owner
to
provide
adequate
maintenance
at
competitive
costs.
An
investment
in
real
estate
is
relatively
illiquid.
Such
illiquidity
will
tend
to
limit
our
ability
to
vary
our
portfolio
promptly
in
response
to
changing
economic
or
investment
conditions.
In
recessionary
times,
it
may
be
difficult
to
dispose
of
certain
types
of
real
estate.
The
costs
of
holding
real
estate
are
considerable,
and
during
an
economic
recession,
we
may
be
faced
with
ongoing
expenditures
with
a
declining
prospect
of
incoming
receipts.
In
such
circumstances,
it
may
be
necessary
for
us
to
dispose
of
properties
at
lower
prices
in
order
to
generate
sufficient
cash
from
operations
and
make
distributions
and
interest
payments.
Certain
significant
expenditures
(e.g.,
property
taxes,
maintenance
costs,
mortgage
payments,
insurance
costs
and
related
charges)
must
be
made
throughout
the
period
of
ownership
of
real
property,
regardless
of
whether
the
property
is
producing
sufficient
income
to
pay
such
expenses.
In
order
to
retain
desirable
rentable
space
and
to
generate
adequate
revenue
over
the
long
term,
we
must
maintain
or,
in
some
cases,
improve
each
property’s
condition
to
meet
market
demand.
Maintaining
a
rental
property
in
accordance
with
market
standards
can
entail
significant
costs,
which
we
may
not
be
able
to
pass
on
to
our
tenants.
Numerous
factors,
including
the
age
of
the
relevant
building
structure,
the
material
and
substances
used
at
the
time
of
construction,
or
currently
unknown
building
code
violations,
could
result
in
substantial
unbudgeted
costs
for
refurbishment
or
modernization.
In
the
course
of
acquiring
a
property,
undisclosed
defects
in
design
or
construction
or
other
risks
might
not
have
been
recognized
or
correctly
evaluated
during
the
pre-‐acquisition
due
diligence
process.
These
circumstances
could
lead
to
additional
costs
and
could
have
an
adverse
effect
on
our
proceeds
from
sales
and
rental
income
of
the
relevant
properties.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
53
ROLLOVER
OF
LEASES
Upon
the
expiry
of
any
lease,
there
can
be
no
assurance
that
the
lease
will
be
renewed
or
the
tenant
replaced.
Furthermore,
the
terms
of
any
subsequent
lease
may
be
less
favourable
than
those
of
the
existing
lease.
Our
cash
flows
and
financial
position
would
be
adversely
affected
if
our
tenants
were
to
become
unable
to
meet
their
obligations
under
their
leases
or
if
a
significant
amount
of
available
space
in
our
properties
could
not
be
leased
on
economically
favourable
lease
terms.
In
the
event
of
default
by
a
tenant,
we
may
experience
delays
or
limitations
in
enforcing
our
rights
as
lessor
and
incur
substantial
costs
in
protecting
our
investment.
Furthermore,
at
any
time,
a
tenant
may
seek
the
protection
of
bankruptcy,
insolvency
or
similar
laws
which
could
result
in
the
rejection
and
termination
of
the
lease
of
the
tenant
and,
thereby,
cause
a
reduction
in
the
cash
flows
available
to
us.
CONCENTRATION
OF
PROPERTIES
AND
TENANTS
Currently,
principally
all
of
our
properties
are
located
in
Canada
and,
as
a
result,
are
impacted
by
economic
and
other
factors
specifically
affecting
the
real
estate
markets
in
Canada.
These
factors
may
differ
from
those
affecting
the
real
estate
markets
in
other
regions.
Due
to
the
concentrated
nature
of
our
properties,
a
number
of
our
properties
could
experience
any
of
the
same
conditions
at
the
same
time.
If
real
estate
conditions
in
Canada
decline
relative
to
real
estate
conditions
in
other
regions,
our
cash
flows
and
financial
condition
may
be
more
adversely
affected
than
those
of
companies
that
have
more
geographically
diversified
portfolios
of
properties.
FINANCING
We
require
access
to
capital
to
maintain
our
properties
as
well
as
to
fund
our
growth
strategy
and
significant
capital
expenditures.
There
is
no
assurance
that
capital
will
be
available
when
needed
or
on
favourable
terms.
Our
access
to
third-‐party
financing
will
be
subject
to
a
number
of
factors,
including
general
market
conditions;
the
market’s
perception
of
our
growth
potential;
our
current
and
expected
future
earnings;
our
cash
flow
and
cash
distributions,
and
cash
interest
payments;
and
the
market
price
of
our
Units.
A
significant
portion
of
our
financing
is
debt.
Accordingly,
we
are
subject
to
the
risks
associated
with
debt
financing,
including
the
risk
that
our
cash
flows
will
be
insufficient
to
meet
required
payments
of
principal
and
interest,
and
that,
on
maturities
of
such
debt,
we
may
not
be
able
to
refinance
the
outstanding
principal
under
such
debt
or
that
the
terms
of
such
refinancing
will
be
more
onerous
than
those
of
the
existing
debt.
If
we
are
unable
to
refinance
debt
at
maturity
on
terms
acceptable
to
us
or
at
all,
we
may
be
forced
to
dispose
of
one
or
more
of
our
properties
on
disadvantageous
terms,
which
may
result
in
losses
and
could
alter
our
debt-‐to-‐equity
ratio
or
be
dilutive
to
unitholders.
Such
losses
could
have
a
material
adverse
effect
on
our
financial
position
or
cash
flows.
The
degree
to
which
we
are
leveraged
could
have
important
consequences
to
our
operations.
A
high
level
of
debt
will
reduce
the
amount
of
funds
available
for
the
payment
of
distributions
to
unitholders
and
interest
payments
on
our
debentures;
limit
our
flexibility
in
planning
for
and
reacting
to
changes
in
the
economy
and
in
the
industry,
and
increase
our
vulnerability
to
general
adverse
economic
and
industry
conditions;
limit
our
ability
to
borrow
additional
funds,
dispose
of
assets,
encumber
our
assets
and
make
potential
investments;
place
us
at
a
competitive
disadvantage
compared
to
other
owners
of
similar
real
estate
assets
that
are
less
leveraged
and,
therefore,
may
be
able
to
take
advantage
of
opportunities
that
our
indebtedness
would
prevent
us
from
pursuing;
make
it
more
likely
that
a
reduction
in
our
borrowing
base
following
a
periodic
valuation
(or
redetermination)
could
require
us
to
repay
a
portion
of
then
outstanding
borrowings;
and
impair
our
ability
to
obtain
additional
financing
in
the
future
for
working
capital,
capital
expenditures,
acquisitions,
general
trust
or
other
purposes.
CHANGES
IN
LAW
We
are
subject
to
applicable
federal,
provincial,
municipal,
local
and
common
laws
and
regulations
governing
the
ownership
and
leasing
of
real
property,
employment
standards,
environmental
matters,
taxes
and
other
matters.
It
is
possible
that
future
changes
in
such
laws
or
regulations,
or
changes
in
their
application,
enforcement
or
regulatory
interpretation,
could
result
in
changes
in
the
legal
requirements
affecting
us
(including
with
retroactive
effect).
In
addition,
the
political
conditions
in
the
jurisdictions
in
which
we
operate
are
also
subject
to
change.
Any
changes
in
investment
policies
or
shifts
in
political
attitudes
may
adversely
affect
our
investments.
Any
changes
in
the
laws
to
which
we
are
subject
in
the
jurisdictions
in
which
we
operate
could
materially
affect
our
rights
and
title
in
and
to
the
properties
and
the
revenues
we
are
able
to
generate
from
our
investments.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
54
INTEREST
RATES
When
entering
into
financing
agreements
or
extending
such
agreements,
we
depend
on
our
ability
to
agree
on
terms
for
interest
payments
that
will
not
impair
our
desired
profit,
and
on
amortization
schedules
that
do
not
restrict
our
ability
to
pay
distributions
on
our
Units
and
interest
payments
on
our
debentures.
In
addition
to
existing
variable
rate
portions
of
our
financing
agreements,
we
may
enter
into
future
financing
agreements
with
variable
interest
rates.
An
increase
in
interest
rates
could
result
in
a
significant
increase
in
the
amount
we
pay
to
service
debt,
which
could
limit
our
ability
to
pay
distributions
to
unitholders
and
could
impact
the
market
price
of
the
Units
and/or
the
debentures.
We
have
implemented
an
active
hedging
program
in
order
to
offset
the
risk
of
revenue
losses
and
to
provide
more
certainty
regarding
the
payment
of
distributions
to
unitholders
and
cash
interest
payments
under
the
debentures
should
current
variable
interest
rates
increase.
However,
to
the
extent
that
we
fail
to
adequately
manage
these
risks,
including
if
any
such
hedging
arrangements
do
not
effectively
or
completely
hedge
increases
in
variable
interest
rates,
our
financial
results,
our
ability
to
pay
distributions
to
unitholders
and
cash
interest
payments
under
our
financing
arrangements,
and
the
debentures
and
future
financings
may
be
negatively
affected.
Hedging
transactions
involve
inherent
risks.
Increases
in
interest
rates
generally
cause
a
decrease
in
demand
for
properties.
Higher
interest
rates
and
more
stringent
borrowing
requirements,
whether
mandated
by
law
or
required
by
banks,
could
have
a
significant
negative
effect
on
our
ability
to
sell
any
of
our
properties.
ENVIRONMENTAL
RISK
As
an
owner
of
real
property,
we
are
subject
to
various
federal,
provincial
and
municipal
laws
relating
to
environmental
matters.
Such
laws
provide
a
range
of
potential
liability,
including
potentially
significant
penalties,
and
potential
liability
for
the
costs
of
removal
or
remediation
of
certain
hazardous
substances.
The
presence
of
such
substances,
if
any,
could
adversely
affect
our
ability
to
sell
or
redevelop
such
real
estate
or
to
borrow
using
such
real
estate
as
collateral
and,
potentially,
could
also
result
in
civil
claims
against
us.
In
order
to
obtain
financing
for
the
purchase
of
a
new
property
through
traditional
channels,
we
may
be
requested
to
arrange
for
an
environmental
audit
to
be
conducted.
Although
such
an
audit
provides
us
and
our
lenders
with
some
assurance,
we
may
become
subject
to
liability
for
undetected
pollution
or
other
environmental
hazards
on
our
properties
against
which
we
cannot
insure,
or
against
which
we
may
elect
not
to
insure
where
premium
costs
are
disproportionate
to
our
perception
of
relative
risk.
We
have
formal
policies
and
procedures
to
review
and
monitor
environmental
exposure.
These
policies
include
the
requirement
to
obtain
a
Phase
I
Environmental
Site
Assessment,
conducted
by
an
independent
and
qualified
environmental
consultant,
before
acquiring
any
real
property
or
any
interest
therein.
JOINT
ARRANGEMENTS
We
are
a
participant
in
jointly
controlled
entities
and
co-‐ownerships,
combined
(“joint
arrangements”)
with
third
parties.
A
joint
arrangement
involves
certain
additional
risks,
including:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
the
possibility
that
such
third
parties
may
at
any
time
have
economic
or
business
interests
or
goals
that
will
be
inconsistent
with
ours,
or
take
actions
contrary
to
our
instructions
or
requests
or
to
our
policies
or
objectives
with
respect
to
our
real
estate
investments;
the
risk
that
such
third
parties
could
experience
financial
difficulties
or
seek
the
protection
of
bankruptcy,
insolvency
or
other
laws,
which
could
result
in
additional
financial
demands
on
us
to
maintain
and
operate
such
properties
or
repay
the
third
parties’
share
of
property
debt
guaranteed
by
us
or
for
which
we
will
be
liable,
and/or
result
in
our
suffering
or
incurring
delays,
expenses
and
other
problems
associated
with
obtaining
court
approval
of
the
joint
arrangement;
the
risk
that
such
third
parties
may,
through
their
activities
on
behalf
of
or
in
the
name
of
the
joint
arrangements,
expose
or
subject
us
to
liability;
and
the
need
to
obtain
third
parties’
consents
with
respect
to
certain
major
decisions,
including
the
decision
to
distribute
cash
generated
from
such
properties
or
to
refinance
or
sell
a
property.
In
addition,
the
sale
or
transfer
of
interests
in
certain
of
the
joint
arrangements
may
be
subject
to
rights
of
first
refusal
or
first
offer,
and
certain
of
the
joint
venture
and
partnership
agreements
may
provide
for
buy-‐sell
or
similar
arrangements.
Such
rights
may
be
triggered
at
a
time
when
we
may
not
desire
to
sell
but
may
be
forced
to
do
so
because
we
do
not
have
the
cash
to
purchase
the
other
party’s
interests.
Such
rights
may
also
inhibit
our
ability
to
sell
an
interest
in
a
property
or
a
joint
arrangement
within
the
time
frame
or
otherwise
on
the
basis
we
desire.
Our
investment
in
properties
through
joint
arrangements
is
subject
to
the
investment
guidelines
set
out
in
our
Declaration
of
Trust.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
55
COMPETITION
The
real
estate
market
in
Canada
is
highly
competitive
and
fragmented,
and
we
compete
for
real
property
acquisitions
with
individuals,
corporations,
institutions
and
other
entities
that
may
seek
real
property
investments
similar
to
those
we
desire.
An
increase
in
the
availability
of
investment
funds
or
an
increase
in
interest
in
real
property
investments
may
increase
competition
for
real
property
investments,
thereby
increasing
purchase
prices
and
reducing
the
yield
on
them.
If
competing
properties
of
a
similar
type
are
built
in
the
area
where
one
of
our
properties
is
located
or
if
similar
properties
located
in
the
vicinity
of
one
of
our
properties
are
substantially
refurbished,
the
net
operating
income
derived
from
and
the
value
of
such
property
could
be
reduced.
Numerous
other
developers,
managers
and
owners
of
properties
will
compete
with
us
in
seeking
tenants.
To
the
extent
that
our
competitors
own
properties
that
are
in
better
locations,
of
better
quality
or
less
leveraged
than
the
properties
owned
by
us,
they
may
be
in
a
better
position
to
attract
tenants
who
might
otherwise
lease
space
in
our
properties.
To
the
extent
that
our
competitors
are
better
capitalized
or
financially
stronger,
they
would
be
in
a
better
position
to
withstand
an
economic
downturn.
The
existence
of
competition
for
tenants
could
have
an
adverse
effect
on
our
ability
to
lease
space
in
our
properties
and
on
the
rents
charged
or
concessions
granted,
and
could
materially
and
adversely
affect
our
cash
flows,
operating
results
and
financial
condition.
INSURANCE
We
carry
general
liability,
umbrella
liability
and
excess
liability
insurance
with
limits
that
are
typically
obtained
for
similar
real
estate
portfolios
in
Canada
and
otherwise
acceptable
to
our
trustees.
For
the
property
risks,
we
carry
“All
Risks”
property
insurance
including,
but
not
limited
to,
flood,
earthquake
and
loss
of
rental
income
insurance
(with
at
least
a
24-‐month
indemnity
period).
We
also
carry
boiler
and
machinery
insurance
covering
all
boilers,
pressure
vessels,
HVAC
systems
and
equipment
breakdown.
However,
certain
types
of
risks
(generally
of
a
catastrophic
nature
such
as
from
war
or
nuclear
accident)
are
uninsurable
under
any
insurance
policy.
Furthermore,
there
are
other
risks
that
are
not
economically
viable
to
insure
at
this
time.
We
partially
self-‐insure
against
terrorism
risk
for
our
entire
portfolio.
We
have
insurance
for
earthquake
risks,
subject
to
certain
policy
limits,
deductibles
and
self-‐insurance
arrangements.
Should
an
uninsured
or
underinsured
loss
occur,
we
could
lose
our
investment
in,
and
anticipated
profits
and
cash
flows
from,
one
or
more
of
our
properties,
but
we
would
continue
to
be
obligated
to
repay
any
recourse
mortgage
indebtedness
on
such
properties.
We
do
not
carry
title
insurance
on
our
properties.
If
a
loss
occurs
resulting
from
a
title
defect
with
respect
to
a
property
where
there
is
no
title
insurance
or
the
loss
is
in
excess
of
insured
limits,
we
could
lose
all
or
part
of
our
investment
in,
and
anticipated
profits
and
cash
flows
from,
such
property.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
56
SECTION
V
–
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING
JUDGMENTS,
ESTIMATES
AND
ASSUMPTIONS
IN
APPLYING
ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
Preparing
the
consolidated
financial
statements
requires
management
to
make
judgments,
estimates
and
assumptions
that
affect
the
amounts
reported.
Management
bases
its
judgments
and
estimates
on
historical
experience
and
other
factors
it
believes
to
be
reasonable
under
the
circumstances,
but
which
are
inherently
uncertain
and
unpredictable,
the
result
of
which
forms
the
basis
of
the
carrying
amounts
of
assets
and
liabilities.
However,
uncertainty
about
these
assumptions
and
estimates
could
result
in
outcomes
that
could
require
a
material
adjustment
to
the
carrying
amount
of
the
affected
asset
or
liability
in
the
future.
Critical
accounting
judgments
The
following
are
the
critical
accounting
judgments
used
in
applying
the
Trust’s
accounting
policies
that
have
the
most
significant
effect
on
the
amounts
in
the
consolidated
financial
statements:
Investment
properties
Critical
judgments
are
made
in
respect
of
the
fair
values
of
investment
properties
and
the
investment
properties
held
in
equity
accounted
investments.
The
fair
values
of
these
investments
are
reviewed
regularly
by
management
with
reference
to
independent
property
valuations
and
market
conditions
existing
at
the
reporting
date,
using
generally
accepted
market
practices.
The
independent
valuators
are
experienced,
nationally
recognized
and
qualified
in
the
professional
valuation
of
office
buildings
in
their
respective
geographic
areas.
Judgment
is
also
applied
in
determining
the
extent
and
frequency
of
independent
appraisals.
At
each
annual
reporting
period,
a
select
number
of
properties,
determined
on
a
rotational
basis,
will
be
valued
by
qualified
valuation
professionals.
For
properties
not
subject
to
independent
appraisals,
internal
appraisals
are
prepared
by
management
during
each
reporting
period.
The
Trust
makes
judgments
with
respect
to
whether
lease
incentives
provided
in
connection
with
a
lease
enhance
the
value
of
the
leased
space,
which
determines
whether
or
not
such
amounts
are
treated
as
tenant
improvements
and
added
to
investment
properties.
Lease
incentives,
such
as
cash,
rent-‐free
periods
and
lessee-‐
or
lessor-‐owned
improvements,
may
be
provided
to
lessees
to
enter
into
an
operating
lease.
Lease
incentives
that
do
not
provide
benefits
beyond
the
initial
lease
term
are
included
in
the
carrying
amount
of
investment
properties
and
are
amortized
as
a
reduction
of
rental
revenue
on
a
straight-‐
line
basis
over
the
term
of
the
lease.
Judgment
is
also
applied
in
determining
whether
certain
costs
are
additions
to
the
carrying
amount
of
the
investment
property
and,
for
properties
under
development,
identifying
the
point
at
which
practical
completion
of
the
property
occurs
and
identifying
the
directly
attributable
borrowing
costs
to
be
included
in
the
carrying
amount
of
the
development
property.
Business
combinations
Accounting
for
business
combinations
under
IFRS
3,
“Business
Combinations”
(“IFRS
3”),
only
applies
if
it
is
considered
that
a
business
has
been
acquired.
Under
IFRS
3,
a
business
is
defined
as
an
integrated
set
of
activities
and
assets
conducted
and
managed
for
the
purpose
of
providing
a
return
to
investors
or
lower
costs
or
other
economic
benefits
directly
and
proportionately
to
the
Trust.
A
business
generally
consists
of
inputs,
processes
applied
to
those
inputs,
and
resulting
outputs
that
are,
or
will
be,
used
to
generate
revenues.
In
the
absence
of
such
criteria,
a
group
of
assets
is
deemed
to
have
been
acquired.
If
goodwill
is
present
in
a
transferred
set
of
activities
and
assets,
the
transferred
set
is
presumed
to
be
a
business.
Judgment
is
used
by
management
in
determining
whether
the
acquisition
of
an
individual
property
qualifies
as
a
business
combination
in
accordance
with
IFRS
3
or
as
an
asset
acquisition.
When
determining
whether
the
acquisition
of
an
investment
property
or
a
portfolio
of
investment
properties
is
a
business
combination
or
an
asset
acquisition,
the
Trust
applies
judgment
when
considering
the
following:
• whether
the
investment
property
or
properties
are
capable
of
producing
outputs
• whether
the
market
participant
could
produce
outputs
if
missing
elements
exist
In
particular,
the
Trust
considers
the
following:
• whether
employees
were
assumed
in
the
acquisition
• whether
an
operating
platform
has
been
acquired
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
57
Currently,
when
the
Trust
acquires
properties
or
a
portfolio
of
properties
and
not
legal
entities,
does
not
take
on
or
assume
employees,
or
does
not
acquire
an
operating
platform,
it
classifies
the
acquisition
as
an
asset
acquisition.
Impairment
The
Trust
assesses
the
possibility
and
amount
of
any
impairment
loss
or
write-‐down
as
it
relates
to
the
Investment
in
Dream
Industrial
REIT,
amounts
receivable,
property
and
equipment,
external
management
contracts,
and
goodwill.
IAS
39,
“Financial
instruments:
Recognition
and
measurement”,
requires
management
to
use
judgment
in
determining
if
the
Trust’s
financial
assets
are
impaired.
In
making
this
judgment,
the
Trust
evaluates,
among
other
factors,
the
duration
and
extent
to
which
the
fair
value
of
the
investment
is
less
than
its
carrying
amount;
and
the
financial
health
of
and
short-‐term
business
outlook
for
the
investee,
including
factors
such
as
industry
and
sector
performance,
changes
in
technology
and
operational
and
financing
cash
flow.
IAS
36,
“Impairment
of
Assets”
(“IAS
36”),
requires
management
to
use
judgment
in
determining
the
recoverable
amount
of
assets
and
equity
accounted
investments
that
are
tested
for
impairment,
including
goodwill
and
the
investment
in
Dream
Industrial
REIT.
Judgment
is
involved
in
estimating
the
fair
value
less
cost
to
sell
or
value-‐in-‐use
of
the
cash-‐generating
units
(“CGUs”)
to
which
goodwill
has
been
allocated,
including
estimates
of
growth
rates,
discount
rates
and
terminal
rates.
Judgment
is
also
involved
in
estimating
the
value-‐in-‐use
of
the
investment
in
Dream
Industrial
REIT,
including
estimates
of
future
cash
flows,
discount
rates
and
terminal
rates.
The
values
assigned
to
these
key
assumptions
reflect
past
experience
and
are
consistent
with
external
sources
of
information.
The
Trust’s
goodwill
balance
is
allocated
to
the
office
properties
group
of
CGUs
by
geographical
segment
(herein
referred
to
as
the
goodwill
CGU).
The
recoverable
amount
of
the
Trust’s
goodwill
CGU
is
determined
based
on
the
value-‐in-‐use
approach.
For
the
purpose
of
this
impairment
test,
the
Trust
uses
cash
flow
projections
forecasted
out
for
a
ten-‐year
period,
consistent
with
the
internal
financial
budgets
approved
by
management
on
a
property-‐by-‐property
basis.
The
key
assumptions
used
in
determining
the
value-‐in-‐use
of
the
goodwill
CGU
are
the
estimated
growth
rate,
discount
rate
and
terminal
rate.
In
arriving
at
the
growth
rate,
the
Trust
considers
past
experience
and
inflation,
as
well
as
industry
trends.
The
Trust
utilizes
weighted
average
cost
of
capital
(“WACC”)
to
determine
the
discount
rate
and
terminal
rate.
The
WACC
reflects
specific
risks
that
would
be
attributable
to
the
Trust.
As
the
Trust
is
not
subject
to
taxation,
no
adjustment
is
required
to
adjust
the
WACC
on
a
pre-‐tax
basis.
Estimates
and
assumptions
The
Trust
makes
estimates
and
assumptions
that
affect
the
carrying
amounts
of
assets
and
liabilities,
the
disclosure
of
contingent
assets
and
liabilities,
and
the
reported
amount
of
earnings
for
the
period.
Actual
results
could
differ
from
these
estimates.
The
estimates
and
assumptions
that
are
critical
in
determining
the
amounts
reported
in
the
consolidated
financial
statements
relate
to
the
following:
Valuation
of
investment
properties
Critical
assumptions
relating
to
the
estimates
of
fair
values
of
investment
properties
include
the
receipt
of
contractual
rents,
expected
future
market
rents,
renewal
rates,
maintenance
requirements,
discount
rates
that
reflect
current
market
uncertainties,
capitalization
rates,
and
current
and
recent
property
investment
prices.
If
there
is
any
change
in
these
assumptions
or
regional,
national
or
international
economic
conditions,
the
fair
value
of
investment
properties
may
change
materially.
Valuation
of
financial
instruments
The
Trust
makes
estimates
and
assumptions
relating
to
the
fair
value
measurement
of
the
subsidiary
redeemable
units,
the
deferred
trust
units,
the
convertible
debenture
conversion
feature,
interest
rate
swaps
and
the
fair
value
disclosure
of
the
convertible
debentures,
mortgages
and
term
debt.
The
critical
assumptions
underlying
the
fair
value
measurements
and
disclosures
include
the
market
price
of
REIT
Units,
market
interest
rates
for
mortgages,
term
debt
and
unsecured
debentures,
and
assessment
of
the
effectiveness
of
hedging
relationships.
For
certain
financial
instruments,
including
cash
and
cash
equivalents,
promissory
notes
receivable,
amounts
receivable,
amounts
payable
and
accrued
liabilities,
deposits
and
distributions
payable,
the
carrying
amounts
approximate
fair
values
due
to
their
immediate
or
short-‐term
maturity.
The
fair
values
of
mortgages,
term
debt
and
interest
rate
swaps
are
determined
based
on
discounted
cash
flows
using
discount
rates
that
reflect
current
market
conditions
for
instruments
with
similar
terms
and
risks.
The
fair
value
of
convertible
debentures
is
determined
by
reference
to
quoted
market
prices
from
an
active
market.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
58
CHANGES
IN
ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
AND
DISCLOSURE
AND
FUTURE
ACCOUNTING
POLICY
CHANGES
Changes
in
accounting
policies
and
disclosures
The
Trust
has
adopted
the
following
new
and
revised
standards,
along
with
any
consequential
amendments,
effective
January
1,
2014.
These
changes
were
made
in
accordance
with
the
applicable
transitional
provisions.
Consolidated
financial
statements
Amendments
to
IFRS
10,
“Consolidated
Financial
Statements”,
IFRS
12,
“Disclosure
of
Interests
in
Other
Entities”
(“IFRS
12”)
and
IAS
27,
“Separate
financial
statements
–
Investment
entities”
(“IAS
27”):
The
amendments
define
an
investment
entity
and
introduce
an
exception
to
consolidating
particular
subsidiaries
for
investment
entities.
These
investments
require
an
investment
entity
to
measure
those
subsidiaries
at
fair
value
through
profit
or
loss,
in
accordance
with
IFRS
9,
“Financial
Instruments”,
in
its
consolidated
and
separate
financial
statements.
The
amendments
also
introduce
new
disclosure
requirements
for
investment
entities
in
IFRS
12
and
IAS
27.
The
Trust
is
not
considered
to
be
an
investment
entity
and
thus,
the
Trust
adopted
these
amendments
without
impact
to
the
consolidated
financial
statements
or
note
disclosures
effective
January
1,
2014.
Segment
reporting
A
reportable
operating
segment
is
a
distinguishable
component
of
the
Trust
that
is
engaged
either
in
providing
related
rental
space
or
services
(business
segment)
or
in
providing
rental
space
or
services
within
a
particular
economic
environment
(geographical
segment),
which
is
subject
to
risks
and
rewards
that
are
different
from
those
of
other
reportable
segments.
The
Trust’s
reportable
operating
segments
include
Western
Canada,
Calgary
downtown,
Calgary
suburban,
Toronto
downtown,
Toronto
suburban,
and
Eastern
Canada,
which
are
based
on
internal
reporting
structure
to
management.
Operating
segments
are
reported
in
a
manner
consistent
with
the
internal
reporting
provided
to
the
chief
operating
decision-‐maker,
determined
to
be
the
Chief
Executive
Officer
(“CEO”)
of
the
Trust.
Prior
to
January
1,
2014,
the
Trust
analyzed
its
operations
as
a
single
office
portfolio.
Beginning
January
1,
2014,
the
CEO
analyzed
the
portfolio
based
on
the
aforementioned
geographical
segments.
The
comparative
amounts
have
been
reclassified
to
conform
to
the
current
year’s
presentation.
Accounting
for
levies
imposed
by
governments
IFRIC
21,
“Levies”
(“IFRIC
21”),
provides
guidance
on
accounting
for
levies
in
accordance
with
IAS
37,
“Provisions,
Contingent
Liabilities
and
Contingent
Assets”.
The
interpretation
defines
a
levy
as
an
outflow
from
an
entity
imposed
by
a
government
in
accordance
with
legislation
and
confirms
that
an
entity
recognizes
a
liability
for
a
levy
only
when
the
triggering
event
specified
in
the
legislation
occurs.
The
Trust
adopted
this
new
interpretation
effective
January
1,
2014
and
it
was
applied
retrospectively.
This
new
interpretation
had
no
material
impact
on
the
amounts
recognized
in
the
Trust’s
consolidated
financial
statements
or
note
disclosures
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014.
Accounting
for
internal
leasing
costs
Prior
to
January
1,
2014,
the
Trust
capitalized
costs
of
certain
internal
leasing
costs
within
initial
direct
leasing
costs
to
investment
properties.
These
costs
would
not
have
been
incurred
if
no
leasing
activity
had
taken
place
and
are
reasonably
and
directly
attributable
to
the
leasing
activity.
On
April
2,
2014,
IFRIC
issued
an
agenda
decision
indicating
that
certain
internal
leasing
costs
such
as
salary
costs
of
permanent
staff
involved
in
negotiating
and
arranging
new
leases
do
not
qualify
as
incremental
costs
in
accordance
with
IAS
17,
“Leases”.
As
a
result,
the
Trust
has
adopted
an
accounting
policy
effective
January
1,
2014
of
recognizing
certain
internal
leasing
costs
involved
in
negotiating
and
arranging
new
leases
in
the
consolidated
statements
of
comprehensive
income
as
incurred.
This
accounting
policy
has
been
applied
retrospectively.
The
impact
for
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013
is
an
increase
to
internal
leasing
costs
expense
included
as
part
of
net
gains
(losses)
on
transactions
and
other
activities
of
$6.1
million
and
$6.5
million,
respectively,
and
a
corresponding
increase
in
fair
value
adjustments
to
investment
properties
of
$6.1
million
and
$6.5
million,
respectively.
This
change
did
not
impact
the
consolidated
balance
sheets.
External
direct
leasing
costs
continue
to
be
capitalized
to
initial
direct
leasing
costs
within
investment
properties.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
59
Future
accounting
policy
changes
Revenue
recognition
IFRS
15,
“Revenue
from
Contracts
with
Customers”
(“IFRS
15”),
provides
a
comprehensive
five-‐step
revenue
recognition
model
for
all
contracts
with
customers.
The
IFRS
15
revenue
recognition
model
requires
management
to
exercise
significant
judgment
and
make
estimates
that
affect
revenue
recognition.
IFRS
15
is
effective
for
annual
periods
beginning
on
or
after
January
1,
2017,
with
earlier
application
permitted.
The
Trust
is
currently
evaluating
the
impact
of
adopting
this
standard
on
the
consolidated
financial
statements.
Financial
instruments
The
final
version
of
IFRS
9,
“Financial
Instruments”
(“IFRS
9”),
was
issued
by
the
IASB
in
July
2014
and
will
replace
IAS
39,
“Financial
Instruments:
Recognition
and
Measurement”.
IFRS
9
introduces
a
model
for
classification
and
measurement,
a
single,
forward-‐looking
“expected
loss”
impairment
model,
and
a
substantially
reformed
approach
to
hedge
accounting.
The
new
single,
principle-‐based
approach
for
determining
the
classification
of
financial
assets
is
driven
by
cash
flow
characteristics
and
the
business
model
in
which
an
asset
is
held.
The
new
model
also
results
in
a
single
impairment
model
being
applied
to
all
financial
instruments,
which
will
require
more
timely
recognition
of
expected
credit
losses.
It
also
includes
changes
in
respect
of
own
credit
risk
in
measuring
liabilities
elected
to
be
measured
at
fair
value,
so
that
gains
caused
by
the
deterioration
of
an
entity’s
own
credit
risk
on
such
liabilities
are
no
longer
recognized
in
profit
or
loss.
IFRS
9
is
effective
for
annual
periods
beginning
on
or
after
January
1,
2018;
however,
it
is
available
for
early
adoption.
In
addition,
the
own
credit
changes
can
be
early
adopted
in
isolation
without
otherwise
changing
the
accounting
for
financial
instruments.
The
Trust
is
currently
evaluating
the
impact
of
adopting
this
standard
on
the
consolidated
financial
statements.
Presentation
of
financial
statements
IAS
1,
“Presentation
of
Financial
Statements”
(“IAS
1”)
was
amended
by
the
IASB
to
clarify
guidance
on
materiality
and
aggregation,
the
presentation
of
subtotals,
the
structure
of
financial
statements
and
disclosure
of
accounting
policies.
The
amendment
gives
guidance
that
information
within
the
consolidated
balance
sheets
and
statements
of
comprehensive
income
should
not
be
aggregated
or
disaggregated
in
a
manner
that
obscures
useful
information,
and
that
disaggregation
may
be
required
in
the
statement
of
comprehensive
income
in
the
form
of
additional
subtotals
as
they
are
relevant
to
understanding
the
entity’s
financial
position
or
performance.
The
amendments
to
IAS
1
are
effective
for
periods
beginning
on
or
after
January
1,
2016.
The
Trust
is
currently
evaluating
the
impact
of
adopting
this
standard
on
the
consolidated
financial
statements.
Equity
accounting
for
investments
in
associates
and
joint
ventures
IAS
28,
“Investments
in
Associates
and
Joint
Ventures”
(“IAS
28”)
was
amended
by
the
IASB
to
allow
an
entity
which
is
not
an
investment
entity,
but
has
interest
in
an
associate
or
joint
venture
which
is
an
investment
entity,
a
policy
choice
when
applying
the
equity
method
of
accounting.
The
entity
may
choose
to
retain
the
fair
value
measurement
applied
by
the
investment
entity
associate
or
joint
venture,
or
to
unwind
the
fair
value
measurement
and
instead
perform
a
consolidation
at
the
level
of
the
investment
entity
associate
or
joint
venture.
The
amendments
to
IAS
28
are
effective
for
periods
beginning
on
or
after
January
1,
2016.
The
Trust
is
currently
evaluating
the
impact
of
adopting
this
standard
on
the
consolidated
financial
statements.
Additional
information
Additional
information
relating
to
Dream
Office
REIT,
including
the
latest
annual
information
form
of
Dream
Office
REIT,
is
available
on
SEDAR
at
www.sedar.com.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
60
SECTION
VI
–
SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION
The
following
tables
within
this
section
include
supplementary
information
on
our
portfolio
as
at
December
31,
2014.
Asset
listing
Property
Ownership
Total
GLA
in
square
feet
Owned
share
of
total
GLA
in
square
feet
Year
built/
renovated
Total
site
area
in
acres
Owned
share
of
site
area
in
acres
Description
of
asset
HSBC
Bank
Place,
Edmonton
100.0%
301,217
301,217
1981
1.6
1.6
19-‐storey
downtown
office
building
with
commercial
parkade
Enbridge
Place,
Edmonton
Saskatoon
Square,
Saskatoon
Station
Tower,
Surrey
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
262,456
262,456
228,312
228,312
219,314
219,314
1981
1980
1994
0.7
0.6
1.0
0.7
22-‐storey
downtown
office
building
0.6
18-‐storey
downtown
office
building
1.0
18-‐storey
office
building
with
grade
1900
Sherwood
Place,
Regina
100.0%
185,104
185,104
1992/2003
3.0
level
retail
3.0
One
9-‐storey
and
one
2-‐storey
downtown
office
building
Milner
Building,
Edmonton
887
Great
Northern
Way,
Vancouver
100.0%
100.0%
173,325
173,325
164,364
164,364
1957
1999
0.9
2.3
0.9
12-‐storey
downtown
office
building
2.3
8-‐storey
office
building
Victoria
Tower,
Regina
100.0%
144,165
144,165
1976
0.8
0.8
15-‐storey
downtown
government
office
building
Baker
Centre,
Edmonton
100.0%
143,994
143,994
1958
0.7
0.7
16-‐storey
downtown
office
building
with
parkade
Princeton
Tower,
Saskatoon
100.0%
134,597
134,597
1988
0.6
0.6
11-‐storey
downtown
office
building
340-‐450
3rd
Avenue
N.,
Saskatoon
100.0%
130,415
130,415
1980/1993
1.1
1.1
2-‐storey
office
building
with
grade
level
retail
HSBC
Building,
Edmonton
100.0%
118,406
118,406
1974
0.4
0.4
12-‐storey
downtown
office
building
with
underground
parking
4259-‐4299
Canada
Way,
Burnaby
100.0%
118,022
118,022
1973/1998
3.2
3.2
Two
2-‐storey
suburban
office
buildings
13888
Wireless
Way,
Richmond
100.0%
116,530
116,530
Highfield
Place,
Edmonton
Scotia
Centre,
Yellowknife
Richmond
Place,
Richmond
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
4400
Dominion
Street,
Burnaby
100.0%
2008
1978
1991
1986
104,578
104,578
107,797
107,797
95,298
93,095
95,298
93,095
1977/2000
and
2006
4.8
0.3
0.7
0.9
1.9
4.8
3-‐storey
suburban
office
building
0.3
10-‐storey
downtown
office
building
0.7
11-‐storey
office
building
0.9
9-‐storey
suburban
office
building
1.9
5-‐storey
suburban
office
building
2055
Premier
Way,
Strathcona
County
Precambrian
Building,
Yellowknife
Northwest
Tower,
Yellowknife
625
Agnes
Street,
New
Westminster
2899
Broadmoor
Blvd.,
Strathcona
County
2693
Broadmoor
Blvd.,
Strathcona
County
1914
Hamilton
Street,
Regina
2665
Renfrew
Street,
Vancouver
100.0%
91,137
91,137
2007
4.3
4.3
2-‐storey
flex
office
building
100.0%
92,140
92,140
1976
0.8
0.8
11-‐storey
office
building
100.0%
100.0%
87,994
85,541
87,994
85,541
1991
1981
0.3
0.6
0.3
11-‐storey
office
building
0.6
5-‐storey
suburban
office
building
100.0%
82,817
82,817
1999
3.5
3.5
2-‐storey
suburban
office
building
100.0%
81,873
81,873
2007
4.1
4.1
2-‐storey
suburban
office
building
100.0%
100.0%
82,264
81,662
82,264
81,662
1973
2009
0.4
3.3
0.4
14-‐storey
downtown
office
building
3.3
2-‐storey
suburban
office
building
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
61
Property
350-‐450
Lansdowne
Street,
Kamloops
2833
Broadmoor
Blvd.,
Strathcona
County
2261
Keating
Cross
Road,
Victoria
960
Quayside
Drive,
New
Westminster
2755
Broadmoor
Blvd.,
Sherwood
Park
2257
&
2301
Premier
Way,
Sherwood
Park
2121
&
2181
Premier
Way,
Sherwood
Park
10199
-‐
101st
Street
NW,
Edmonton
2220
College
Avenue,
Regina
Morgex
Building,
Edmonton
Gallery
Building,
Yellowknife
Harbour
Landing,
Phase
2,
Regina
13183
-‐
146th
Street
NW,
Edmonton
2400
College
Avenue,
Regina
Royal
Centre,
Saskatoon
2208
Scarth
Street,
Regina
Royal
Centre,
Saskatoon
2445
-‐
13th
Avenue,
Regina
234
-‐
1st
Avenue
South,
Saskatoon
Western
Canada
Telus
Tower,
Calgary
IBM
Corporate
Park,
Calgary
840
-‐
7th
Avenue
SW,
Calgary
444
-‐
7th
Building,
Calgary
McFarlane
Tower,
Calgary
Life
Plaza,
Calgary
Rocky
Mountain
Plaza,
Calgary
Northland
Building,
Calgary
606
4th
Building
&
Barclay
Parkade,
Calgary
Total
GLA
in
square
feet
Owned
share
of
total
GLA
in
square
feet
Year
built/
renovated
Total
site
area
in
acres
Owned
share
of
site
area
in
acres
Description
of
asset
190,773
76,309
1970/2008
11.9
4.8
One
1-‐storey,
one
2-‐storey
and
one
4-‐storey
retail
and
office
complex
Ownership
(4)
40.0%
100.0%
75,254
75,254
2000
3.2
3.2
2-‐storey
flex
office
building
(4)
40.0%
181,693
72,677
1999
4.9
Financial
Building,
Regina
100.0%
4370
Dominion
Street,
Burnaby
100.0%
Preston
Centre,
Saskatoon
100.0%
65,764
63,930
61,867
65,764
1958/1992
63,930
1983/1999
61,867
1988/2003
0.6
1.0
3.1
2.0
One
2-‐storey
and
one
4-‐storey
suburban
office
building
0.6
8-‐storey
downtown
office
building
1.0
6-‐storey
suburban
office
building
3.1
3-‐storey
suburban
office
building
with
grade
level
retail
100.0%
61,694
61,694
1988
1.8
1.8
4-‐storey
suburban
office
building
100.0%
61,302
61,302
2005
2.9
2.9
2-‐storey
suburban
office
building
100.0%
153,299
153,299
2003
8.7
8.7
2-‐storey
suburban
office
building
100.0%
151,456
151,456
2005-‐2006
7.8
7.8
2-‐storey
suburban
office
building
(4)
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
121,357
60,679
1985
0.7
0.4
5-‐storey
downtown
office
building
59,590
53,000
50,150
38,738
59,590
1976
53,000
1982/1995
50,150
38,738
2012
2013
0.6
4.8
0.1
2.3
0.6
7-‐storey
suburban
office
building
4.8
1-‐storey
suburban
office
building
0.1
3-‐storey
office
building
2.3
3-‐storey
suburban
office
building
100.0%
38,817
38,817
2005
2.6
2.6
2-‐storey
suburban
office
building
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
35,528
32,116
25,185
16,423
16,096
9,567
35,528
32,116
25,185
16,423
16,096
9,567
94.4%
5,090,016
4,805,858
710,243
355,122
357,277
357,277
1977
1952
1974
1952
1975
1971
1983
2002
269,467
269,467
1979/2001
251,931
251,931
1963/1998
241,815
241,815
1979/2003
236,709
236,709
1980/1992
205,254
205,254
146,600
146,600
1972
1982
132,885
132,885
1969/1998
(3)
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
0.5
0.7
3.2
0.3
0.4
0.7
0.5
5-‐storey
suburban
office
building
0.7
Retail
component
of
office/
retail
complex
3.2
2-‐storey
suburban
office
building
0.3
4-‐storey
downtown
office/
retail
complex
0.4
3-‐storey
downtown
office
building
0.7
4-‐storey
parking
garage
with
grade
level
retail
105.6
95.3
1.7
2.4
0.4
0.8
0.7
0.5
0.9
0.4
0.3
0.9
28-‐storey
downtown
office
building
2.4
One
5-‐storey
and
two
6-‐storey
downtown
office
buildings
0.4
20-‐storey
downtown
office
building
0.8
10-‐storey
downtown
office
building
0.7
18-‐storey
downtown
office
building
0.5
18-‐storey
downtown
office
building
0.9
14-‐storey
downtown
office
building
0.4
14-‐storey
downtown
office
building
0.3
14-‐storey
downtown
office
building
and
parkade
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
62
Property
Ownership
Roslyn
Building,
Calgary
Atrium
I,
Calgary
Atrium
II,
Calgary
510
-‐
5th
Street
SW,
Calgary
Joffre
Place,
Calgary
Dominion
Centre,
Calgary
435
-‐
4th
Avenue
SW,
Calgary
1035
-‐
7th
Ave
SW,
Calgary
Mount
Royal
Place,
Calgary
441
-‐
5th
Avenue
SW,
Calgary
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Calgary
Downtown
89.9%
3,500,979
Total
GLA
in
square
feet
Owned
share
of
total
GLA
in
square
feet
Year
built/
renovated
Total
site
area
in
acres
Owned
share
of
site
area
in
acres
Description
of
asset
131,763
131,763
1966/2003
109,793
109,793
109,392
109,392
109,181
109,181
107,261
107,261
99,014
88,737
75,129
59,377
59,151
99,014
88,737
75,129
1979/2002
59,377
1979/2004
59,151
3,145,858
149,660
149,660
149,327
149,327
1978
1979
1981
1980
1979
1978
1973
1981
2000
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.2
0.6
0.3
0.4
0.6
0.5
0.2
12.3
7.9
0.5
10-‐storey
downtown
office
building
0.5
8-‐storey
downtown
office
building
0.4
8-‐storey
downtown
office
building
0.2
18-‐storey
downtown
office
building
0.6
6-‐storey
downtown
office
building
0.3
11-‐storey
downtown
office
building
0.4
7-‐storey
downtown
office
building
0.6
6-‐storey
downtown
office
building
0.5
6-‐storey
downtown
office
building
0.2
10-‐storey
downtown
office
building
11.5
7.9
Two
2-‐storey
suburban
office
buildings
-‐
-‐
8-‐storey
suburban
office
building
87,250
77,906
73,541
61,272
87,250
2001
77,906
1982/2002
to
2003
73,541
61,272
1981
2000
5.1
0.6
2.3
2.2
5.1
3-‐storey
suburban
office
building
0.6
5-‐storey
suburban
office
building
with
grade
level
retail
2.3
4-‐storey
suburban
office
building
2.2
3-‐storey
office
building
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
54,846
54,846
1982
0.3
0.3
6-‐storey
suburban
office
building
100.0%
100.0%
(4)
15.0%
87.2%
(3)
66.7%
50,577
33,507
130,798
868,684
50,577
1978/2001
33,507
19,620
757,506
1981
1977
1,578,741
1,052,547
1989/2011
2.6
0.9
2.0
23.9
2.4
2.6
2-‐storey
suburban
office
building
0.9
3-‐storey
suburban
office
building
0.3
8-‐storey
suburban
office
building
22.2
1.6
68-‐storey,
5-‐storey
and
3-‐storey
downtown
office
buildings
with
below
grade
retail
concourse
2.1
One
22-‐storey
and
one
20-‐storey
downtown
office
building
Adelaide
Place,
Toronto
100.0%
655,230
655,230
1982/2001
2.1
100.0%
413,933
413,933
1958/2001
1.3
1.3
17-‐storey
downtown
office
building
100.0%
100.0%
(3)
66.7%
322,669
322,669
297,582
297,582
1992
1990
401,705
267,817
1951/2011
0.7
1.3
0.6
0.7
20-‐storey
downtown
office
building
1.3
17-‐storey
downtown
office
building
0.4
26-‐storey
downtown
office
building
100.0%
265,812
265,812
1958/1968
and
2011
0.4
0.4
10-‐storey
commercial
office
building
100.0%
100.0%
214,054
247,743
247,743
1989
214,054
1875/2008
to
2009
231,811
1967/2008
to
2009
0.6
0.5
0.6
11-‐storey
downtown
office
building
0.5
13-‐storey
downtown
office
building
0.5
0.5
18-‐storey
downtown
office
building
18
King
Street
East,
Toronto
100.0%
231,811
330
Bay
Street,
Toronto
100.0%
161,892
161,892
1926
0.4
0.4
One
16-‐storey
and
one
11-‐storey
downtown
office
building
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
63
Franklin
Atrium,
Calgary
Airport
Corporate
Centre,
Calgary
2891
Sunridge
Way,
Calgary
Kensington
House,
Calgary
3115
-‐
12th
Street
NE,
Calgary
14505
Bannister
Road,
SE,
Calgary
Braithwaite
Boyle
Centre,
Calgary
Franklin
Building,
Calgary
2816
-‐
11th
Street
NE,
Calgary
Centre
70,
Calgary
Calgary
Suburban
Scotia
Plaza
(40
King
Street
West),
Toronto
State
Street
Financial
Centre,
Toronto
AIR
MILES
Tower,
Toronto
655
Bay
Street,
Toronto
Scotia
Plaza
(44
King
Street
West),
Toronto
74
Victoria
St/137
Yonge
St,
Toronto
720
Bay
Street,
Toronto
36
Toronto
Street,
Toronto
Property
100
Yonge
Street,
Toronto
20
Toronto
St/33
Victoria
St,
Toronto
Ownership
(3)
66.7%
100.0%
157,852
8
King
Street
East,
Toronto
100.0%
148,142
Total
GLA
in
square
feet
Owned
share
of
total
GLA
in
square
feet
Year
built/
renovated
Total
site
area
in
acres
Owned
share
of
site
area
in
acres
Description
of
asset
242,645
161,771
1989
157,852
1965/2009
to
2011
148,142
1914/2006
to
2008
0.3
0.4
0.2
17-‐storey
downtown
office
building
0.4
15-‐storey
commercial
office
building
0.2
0.2
21-‐storey
downtown
office
building
250
Dundas
Street
West,
Toronto
100.0%
121,593
121,593
1983
0.6
0.6
8-‐storey
downtown
office
building
Victory
Building,
Toronto
100.0%
101,421
425
Bloor
Street
East,
Toronto
212
King
Street
West,
Toronto
357
Bay
Street,
Toronto
360
Bay
Street,
Toronto
10
King
Street
East,
Toronto
350
Bay
Street,
Toronto
67
Richmond
Street
West,
Toronto
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
83,527
73,277
63,529
57,744
57,476
52,796
50,158
366
Bay
Street,
Toronto
100.0%
36,371
49
Ontario
Street,
Toronto
56
Temperance
Street,
Toronto
10
Lower
Spadina
Avenue,
Toronto
(4)
40.0%
100.0%
(4)
40.0%
87,105
32,338
60,255
101,421
1925/2007
to
2008
83,527
1986
73,277
1908/1980
63,529
1921/2008
57,744
1955/2007
to
2009
57,476
1965/2010
52,796
1928/1987
50,158
1940
36,371
1959/2006
and
2009
34,842
1972
32,338
1984/2008
24,102
1988
0.2
0.2
20-‐storey
downtown
office
building
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.6
5-‐storey
downtown
office
building
0.4
6-‐storey
downtown
historical
office
building
0.2
10-‐storey
downtown
office
building
0.1
10-‐storey
downtown
office
building
0.1
14-‐storey
downtown
office
building
0.1
13-‐storey
downtown
office
building
0.2
7-‐storey
downtown
office
building
0.1
0.1
12-‐storey
downtown
office
building
1.1
0.1
0.1
0.4
7-‐storey
downtown
office
building
0.1
10-‐storey
downtown
office
building
0.0
7-‐storey
downtown
office
building
83
Yonge
Street,
Toronto
100.0%
11,504
11,504
1857/2006
0.1
0.1
3-‐storey
downtown
office
building
with
Toronto
Downtown
5915-‐5935
Airport
Road,
Mississauga
Aviva
Corporate
Centre,
Toronto
6655-‐6725
Airport
Road,
Mississauga
5001
Yonge
Street,
Toronto
2075
Kennedy
Road,
Toronto
5945-‐5955
Airport
Road,
Mississauga
50
Burnhamthorpe
Road
West,
Mississauga
(Sussex
Centre)
30
Eglinton
Avenue
West,
Mississauga
401
&
405
The
West
Mall,
Toronto
(Commerce
West)
300,
302
&
304
The
East
Mall,
Toronto
(Valhalla
Executive
Centre)
86.7%
6,228,905
5,399,533
100.0%
493,811
493,811
1983
15.7
10.5
100.0%
352,425
352,425
1987
9.8
grade
level
retail
13.8
10.5
11-‐storey
suburban
office
building
9.8
3-‐storey,
2-‐storey
and
7-‐storey
suburban
office
complex
100.0%
331,372
331,372
1983
12.6
12.6
6-‐storey
and
7-‐storey
suburban
office
buildings,
1-‐storey
and
2-‐storey
flex
buildings
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
(4)
49.9%
308,568
308,568
205,835
205,835
177,985
177,985
1992
1991
1981
1.0
5.4
6.8
1.0
20-‐storey
office
building
5.4
13-‐storey
suburban
office
building
6.8
3-‐storey
suburban
office
complex
350,997
175,148
1987
2.1
1.0
15-‐storey
suburban
office
building
with
retail
space
100.0%
165,012
165,012
1989
6.3
6.3
8-‐storey
suburban
office
building
(4)
40.0%
(4)
49.9%
411,842
164,737
1985/2007
4.6
1.8
Two
11-‐storey
suburban
office
buildings
326,389
162,868
1973
4.5
2.2
9-‐storey
and
two
6-‐storey
suburban
office
buildings
625
Cochrane
Drive,
Markham
100.0%
162,792
162,792
1989
5.8
5.8
10-‐storey
suburban
office
building
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
64
Property
Ownership
Total
GLA
in
square
feet
Owned
share
of
total
GLA
in
square
feet
Year
built/
renovated
Total
site
area
in
acres
Owned
share
of
site
area
in
acres
Description
of
asset
100.0%
154,774
154,774
1990
16.6
16.6
9-‐storey
suburban
office
building
304,750
152,070
1989
0.9
0.5
16-‐storey
suburban
office
building
with
2645
Skymark
Ave.,
Mississauga
100.0%
142,436
142,436
1984
297,292
148,349
1989/2006
Valleywood
Corporate
Centre,
Markham
90
Burnhamthorpe
Road
West,
Mississauga
(Sussex
Centre)
185
The
West
Mall,
Toronto
(4)
49.9%
(4)
49.9%
6299
Airport
Road,
Mississauga
100.0%
1020
Birchmount
Road,
Toronto
100.0%
6303
Airport
Road,
Mississauga
195
The
West
Mall,
Toronto
191
The
West
Mall,
Toronto
586
Argus
Road,
Oakville
2810
Matheson
Boulevard
East,
Mississauga
100.0%
(4)
49.9%
(4)
49.9%
100.0%
(4)
49.9%
6509
Airport
Road,
Mississauga
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
(4)
40.0%
(4)
40.0%
(4)
40.0%
(4)
40.0%
100.0%
2550
Argentia
Road,
Mississauga
100
Gough
Road,
Markham
6501
Mississauga
Road,
Mississauga
2010
Winston
Park
Drive,
Oakville
6531
Mississauga
Road,
Mississauga
80
Whitehall
Drive,
Markham
3035
Orlando
Drive,
Mississauga
Toronto
Suburban
700
De
la
Gauchetière
Street
West,
Montréal
445
Opus
Industrial
Boulevard,
Mount
Juliet,
Nashville
275
Dundas
Street
West,
London
(London
City
Centre)
200
Chemin
Sainte-‐Foy,
Québec
City
retail
space
4.6
16-‐storey
suburban
office
building
6.6
2-‐storey
suburban
office
building
with
warehouse
2.1
7-‐storey
suburban
office
building
3.7
1-‐storey
industrial
building
1.8
5-‐storey
suburban
office
building
2.5
11-‐storey
suburban
office
building
2.5
11-‐storey
suburban
office
building
2.6
2-‐storey
suburban
office
building
2.6
8-‐storey
suburban
office
building
with
grade
level
retail
2.9
2-‐storey
suburban
office
building
4.9
2-‐storey
suburban
office
building
9.2
2-‐storey
suburban
data
centre
3.0
1-‐storey
suburban
office
building
9.3
6.6
2.1
3.7
1.8
5.1
5.0
2.6
5.3
2.9
4.9
9.2
7.6
90,779
87,161
80,325
160,812
158,260
90,779
1975/2007
87,161
1952
80,325
1979/2007
80,245
78,972
1984
1985
74,570
74,570
1992/2011
140,123
69,921
1989
60,000
51,639
60,000
1981/2010
51,639
1987
111,840
111,840
84,725
33,890
1980
1982
79,137
31,655
1990
3.8
1.5
5-‐storey
suburban
office
building
71,192
28,477
1978
6.5
2.6
1-‐storey
suburban
office
building
60,805
16,754
24,322
16,754
1990
1991
1.1
2.4
0.4
2-‐storey
suburban
office
building
2.4
1-‐storey
suburban
office
building
76.5%
5,514,402
4,218,732
166.8
136.2
100.0%
956,725
956,725
1983/2003
and
2010
1.6
1.6
28-‐storey
downtown
office
building
100.0%
717,160
717,160
2010
16.5
16.5
1-‐storey
industrial
building
(4)
40.0%
540,933
216,373
1974
2.8
1.1
One
21-‐storey
and
one
23-‐storey
downtown
office
building
100.0%
398,351
398,351
1970/2005
0.4
0.4
12-‐storey
office
building
with
parking
Market
Square,
Kitchener
100.0%
241,341
241,341
1975/1986
4.0
4.0
3-‐storey
downtown
office/retail
100
Frederick
Street,
Kitchener
1
Riverside
Drive,Windsor
100.0%
100.0%
239,428
239,428
1981/2005
235,915
235,915
2002
1.8
1.8
building
1.8
10-‐storey
downtown
office
building
1.8
14-‐storey
office
building
with
ground
floor
podium
and
below
grade
retail
50
Queen
Street
North,
Kitchener
100.0%
170,333
170,333
1978/2004
0.9
0.9
11-‐storey
downtown
office
building
55
King
Street
West,
Kitchener
235
King
Street
East,
Kitchener
100.0%
100.0%
126,075
126,075
100,797
100,797
1992
1977
1.1
0.6
1.1
12-‐storey
downtown
office
building
0.6
6-‐storey
downtown
office
building
with
underground
parking
22
Frederick
Street,
Kitchener
100.0%
95,855
95,855
1973/1999
0.7
0.7
12-‐storey
downtown
office
building
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
65
Property
Ownership
Total
GLA
in
square
feet
Owned
share
of
total
GLA
in
square
feet
Year
built/
renovated
Total
site
area
in
acres
Owned
share
of
site
area
in
acres
Description
of
asset
Accelerator
Building,
Waterloo
180
Keil
Drive
South,
Chatham
70
King
Street
East,
Kitchener
2450
Rue
Girouard,
Saint-‐Hyacinthe
12800
Foster
Street,
Overland
Park
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
92,862
36,927
9,485
92,862
36,927
2006
2005
9,485
1977/2009
231,500
231,500
1959/1967
5.5
3.6
0.9
5.4
5.5
3-‐storey
office
building
3.6
1-‐storey
office
building
with
parking
0.9
1-‐storey
retail
restaurant
building
5.4
Two
5-‐storey
office
buildings
100.0%
185,178
185,178
2006
10.0
10.0
5-‐storey
office
building
with
parking
400
Cumberland
Road,
Ottawa
2200-‐2204
Walkley
Road,
Ottawa
130
Slater
Street,
Ottawa
900
Place
D'Youville,
Québec
City
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
174,322
174,322
1972/2000
158,898
158,898
1985
122,906
122,906
1968
122,671
122,671
1956/1988
0.5
7.1
0.4
0.5
0.5
11-‐storey
downtown
office
building
7.1
One
2-‐storey
and
one
5-‐storey
suburban
office
building
0.4
13-‐storey
downtown
office
building
0.5
One
9-‐storey
and
one
8-‐storey
office
building
Gateway
Business
Park,
Ottawa
100.0%
120,995
120,995
1987
6.0
6.0
Three
6-‐storey
suburban
office
1125
Innovation
Drive,
Ottawa
100.0%
115,771
115,771
2000
7.0
buildings
7.0
One
3-‐storey
and
two
2-‐storey
suburban
office
buildings
150
Metcalfe
Street,
Ottawa
22
Varennes
Street,
Gatineau
360
Laurier
Avenue
West,
Ottawa
580
Rue
Grande
Allée,
Québec
City
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
109,003
109,003
107,783
107,783
1991
2001
107,298
107,298
1966/2010
0.2
4.3
0.3
0.2
22-‐storey
downtown
office
building
4.3
2-‐storey
suburban
office
building
0.3
11-‐storey
downtown
office
building
100.0%
90,777
90,777
1912
1.0
1.0
6-‐storey
office
building
with
parkade
250
King
Street,
Fredericton
100.0%
277
Pleasant
Street,
Dartmouth
100.0%
80,162
76,527
80,162
76,527
1999
1971
1.4
1.8
1.4
4-‐storey
office
building
1.8
5-‐storey
office
building
with
underground
parking
219
Laurier
Avenue
West,
Ottawa
8550
Newman
Boulevard,
Montréal
236
Brownlow
Avenue,
Dartmouth
2625
Queensview
Drive,
Ottawa
1305
Chemin
Sainte-‐Foy,
Québec
City
Seven
Capella
Court,
Ottawa
111
Ilsley
Avenue,
Dartmouth
700
De
la
Gauchetière
Street
West,
Montréal
680
Broadway
Street,
Tillsonburg
(Tillsonburg
Gateway
Centre)
141
Saint
Jean
Street,
Québec
City
460
Two
Nations
Crossing,
Fredericton
(4)
40.0%
187,783
75,113
1965
0.3
0.1
14-‐storey
downtown
office
building
100.0%
66,397
66,397
2001/2005
2.8
2.8
2-‐storey
suburban
office
building
100.0%
60,739
60,739
1987
4.2
4.2
1-‐storey
suburban
office
building
100.0%
46,156
46,156
1983
2.7
2.7
2-‐storey
suburban
office
building
100.0%
36,542
36,542
1957/1991
0.3
0.3
5-‐storey
office
building
with
parking
100.0%
100.0%
79.2%
(4)
49.9%
31,362
27,428
32,788
31,362
27,428
2002
1983
25,968
1983/2003
and
2010
1.3
1.6
1.6
1.3
3-‐storey
suburban
office
building
1.6
3-‐storey
suburban
office
building
1.3
3-‐level
retail
podium
47,016
23,461
2003
8.3
4.1
1-‐storey
neighbourhood
shopping
plaza
100.0%
22,333
22,333
1920
0.2
0.2
3-‐storey
office/residential
building
(4)
40.0%
50,945
20,378
2008
3.7
1.5
3-‐storey
suburban
office
building
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
66
Property
117
Kearney
Lake
Road,
Halifax
55
Norfolk
Street
South,
Simcoe
Ownership
(4)
35.0%
(4)
40.0%
Eastern
Canada
(1)
(2)
Total
Redevelopment
properties:
Bellanca
Building,
Yellowknife
Redevelopment
properties
Held
for
sale
properties:
Capital
Centre,
Edmonton
Held
for
sale
properties
Total
including
redevelopment
and
held
for
sale
properties
Total
GLA
in
square
feet
Owned
share
of
total
GLA
in
square
feet
Year
built/
renovated
Total
site
area
in
acres
Owned
share
of
site
area
in
acres
Description
of
asset
36,353
12,887
12,724
1994
5,155
1987/2000
91.8%
6,424,707
5,895,174
87.7%
27,627,693
24,222,661
100.0%
100.0%
(3)
25.0%
25.0%
52,285
52,285
52,285
52,285
1973
64,114
16,029
1978
64,114
16,029
4.2
0.6
119.9
444.2
0.6
0.6
0.9
0.9
1.5
1-‐storey
retail
plaza
0.2
2-‐storey
office/retail
complex
108.2
387.2
0.6
10-‐storey
office
building
0.6
0.2
2-‐storey
downtown
office
building
0.2
87.6%
27,744,092
4,290,975
445.7
388.0
(1)
Includes
properties
in
southwestern
Ontario
and
U.S.
(2)
Excludes
redevelopment
properties
and
held
for
sale
properties.
(3)
Investment
in
joint
venture.
(4)
Co-‐owned
property.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
67
Total
GLA
in
square
feet
Owned
share
of
total
GLA
in
square
feet
No.
of
tenants
Average
tenant
size
in
square
feet
Average
lease
term
remaining
in
years
Owned
share
vacant
in
square
feet
Occupancy
(1)
Owned
share
occupancy
in
square
feet
15,306
52,491
14,773
11,078
26,443
34,665
32,873
72,083
5,108
7,003
24,670
5,370
4,581
58,265
9,874
7,454
11,834
4,771
7,595
11,337
5,948
5,976
2.66
3.93
3.39
5.20
3.80
2.85
4.03
3.76
3.24
4.98
4.48
1.88
2.14
3.31
1.30
7.52
3.98
3.58
3.45
4.55
4.91
3.41
25,701
91.5%
275,516
-‐
100.0%
262,456
6,718
19,908
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
21,405
15,551
31,735
11,016
40,145
97.1%
90.9%
221,594
199,406
100.0%
185,104
100.0%
173,325
100.0%
164,364
100.0%
144,165
85.1%
88.4%
75.7%
90.7%
66.0%
122,589
119,046
98,680
107,390
77,877
-‐
100.0%
116,530
55,208
3,446
623
2,442
47.2%
96.8%
99.3%
97.4%
-‐
100.0%
12,781
4,719
13,834
86.1%
94.6%
83.8%
49,370
104,351
94,675
90,653
91,137
79,359
83,275
71,707
13,803
1.93
-‐
100.0%
82,817
8,314
2.17
7,046
91.4%
74,827
301,217
262,456
228,312
219,314
185,104
173,325
118,406
118,022
116,530
104,578
107,797
95,298
93,095
91,137
92,140
87,994
85,541
301,217
262,456
228,312
219,314
185,104
173,325
164,364
144,165
143,994
134,597
130,415
118,406
118,022
116,530
104,578
107,797
95,298
93,095
91,137
92,140
87,994
85,541
82,817
82,817
81,873
81,873
82,264
81,662
190,773
82,264
81,662
76,309
18
5
15
18
7
5
5
2
24
17
4
20
17
2
5
14
8
19
12
7
14
12
6
9
7
1
Occupancy
by
asset
Property
HSBC
Bank
Place,
Edmonton
Enbridge
Place,
Edmonton
Saskatoon
Square,
Saskatoon
Station
Tower,
Surrey
1900
Sherwood
Place,
Regina
Milner
Building,
Edmonton
887
Great
Northern
Way,
Vancouver
164,364
Victoria
Tower,
Regina
Baker
Centre,
Edmonton
Princeton
Tower,
Saskatoon
144,165
143,994
134,597
340-‐450
3rd
Avenue
N.,
Saskatoon
130,415
HSBC
Building,
Edmonton
4259-‐4299
Canada
Way,
Burnaby
13888
Wireless
Way,
Richmond
Highfield
Place,
Edmonton
Scotia
Centre,
Yellowknife
Richmond
Place,
Richmond
4400
Dominion
Street,
Burnaby
2055
Premier
Way,
Strathcona
County
Precambrian
Building,
Yellowknife
Northwest
Tower,
Yellowknife
625
Agnes
Street,
New
Westminster
2899
Broadmoor
Blvd.,
Strathcona
County
2693
Broadmoor
Blvd.,
Strathcona
County
1914
Hamilton
Street,
Regina
2665
Renfrew
Street,
Vancouver
350-‐450
Lansdowne
Street,
Kamloops
(5)
2833
Broadmoor
Blvd.,
Strathcona
County
Financial
Building,
Regina
4370
Dominion
Street,
Burnaby
Preston
Centre,
Saskatoon
960
Quayside
Drive,
New
Westminster
2755
Broadmoor
Blvd.,
Sherwood
Park
2261
Keating
Cross
Road,
Victoria
(5)
181,693
11,752
81,662
30
5,450
2.17
5.50
4.95
-‐
-‐
10,913
100.0%
100.0%
85.7%
82,264
81,662
65,396
75,254
75,254
17
3,908
3.49
8,817
88.3%
66,437
65,764
63,930
61,867
61,694
72,677
65,764
63,930
61,867
61,694
7
3
8
13
12
21,542
21,921
4,428
4,759
4,869
2.66
1.07
3.49
5.10
1.89
12,361
83.0%
60,316
-‐
100.0%
28,507
55.4%
-‐
100.0%
3,272
94.7%
65,764
35,423
61,867
58,422
61,302
61,302
16
3,831
3.16
-‐
100.0%
61,302
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
68
Harbour
Landing,
Phase
2,
Regina
38,738
Property
2257
&
2301
Premier
Way,
Sherwood
Park
2121
&
2181
Premier
Way,
Sherwood
Park
10199
-‐
101st
Street
NW,
Edmonton
(5)
2220
College
Avenue,
Regina
Morgex
Building,
Edmonton
Gallery
Building,
Yellowknife
13183
-‐
146th
Street
NW,
Edmonton
2400
College
Avenue,
Regina
Royal
Centre,
Saskatoon
2208
Scarth
Street,
Regina
Royal
Centre,
Saskatoon
2445
-‐
13th
Avenue,
Regina
234
-‐
1st
Avenue
South,
Saskatoon
Western
Canada
Telus
Tower,
Calgary
(4)
IBM
Corporate
Park,
Calgary
840
-‐
7th
Avenue
SW,
Calgary
444
-‐
7th
Building,
Calgary
McFarlane
Tower,
Calgary
Life
Plaza,
Calgary
59,590
53,000
50,150
38,817
35,528
32,128
25,185
16,411
16,096
9,567
710,243
357,277
269,467
251,931
241,815
236,709
Rocky
Mountain
Plaza,
Calgary
205,254
Northland
Building,
Calgary
606
4th
Building
&
Barclay
Parkade,
Calgary
Roslyn
Building,
Calgary
Atrium
I,
Calgary
Atrium
II,
Calgary
510
-‐
5th
Street
SW,
Calgary
Joffre
Place,
Calgary
Dominion
Centre,
Calgary
435
-‐
4th
Avenue
SW,
Calgary
1035
-‐
7th
Ave
SW,
Calgary
Mount
Royal
Place,
Calgary
441
-‐
5th
Avenue
SW,
Calgary
146,600
132,885
131,763
109,793
109,392
109,181
107,261
99,014
88,737
75,129
59,377
59,151
Total
GLA
in
square
feet
Owned
share
of
total
GLA
in
square
feet
No.
of
tenants
Average
tenant
size
in
square
feet
Average
lease
term
remaining
in
years
Owned
share
vacant
in
square
feet
Occupancy
(1)
Owned
share
occupancy
in
square
feet
153,299
153,299
15
8,856
3.36
20,458
86.7%
132,841
151,456
151,456
18
8,414
4.66
-‐
100.0%
151,456
121,357
60,679
65,532
2.79
27,913
54.0%
32,767
1
1
1
2
2
6
4
2
3
7
4
6
59,590
53,000
25,075
19,369
6,470
8,195
16,064
8,032
2,344
1,799
1,595
59,590
53,000
50,150
38,738
38,817
35,528
32,128
25,185
16,411
16,096
9,567
355,122
357,277
269,467
251,931
241,815
236,709
205,254
146,600
132,885
131,763
109,793
109,392
109,181
107,261
99,014
88,737
75,129
59,377
59,151
7
10
19
5
34
35
13
22
12
14
8
13
29
12
6
15
3
19
16
100,968
35,728
11,105
30,467
6,918
6,029
14,948
5,520
8,441
9,412
13,724
6,604
3,759
7,151
15,239
5,740
23,903
3,125
3,043
1.58
4.75
7.17
8.62
3.29
0.84
4.25
3.71
2.56
1.13
2.14
3.68
2.29
3.66
4.00
6.78
3.79
2.82
7.04
3.85
3.11
1.76
4.11
4.97
3.31
4.75
3.58
3.80
3.38
3.64
2.88
3.82
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
2,747
92.3%
-‐
100.0%
1,088
95.7%
-‐
100.0%
8,900
44.7%
-‐
100.0%
59,590
53,000
50,150
38,738
38,817
32,781
32,128
24,097
16,411
7,196
9,567
397,254
91.7%
4,408,605
1,734
99.5%
353,388
-‐
100.0%
357,277
58,476
99,598
6,614
25,706
10,928
25,153
31,598
78.3%
60.5%
97.3%
89.1%
94.7%
82.8%
76.2%
210,991
152,333
235,201
211,003
194,326
121,447
101,287
-‐
-‐
100.0%
131,763
100.0%
109,793
23,542
158
21,450
7,581
2,642
3,420
78.5%
99.9%
80.0%
92.3%
97.0%
95.4%
-‐
100.0%
10,465
82.3%
85,850
109,023
85,811
91,433
86,095
71,709
59,377
48,686
329,065
89.5%
2,816,793
5,090,016
4,805,858
451
10,266
Calgary
Downtown
3,500,979
3,145,858
292
10,857
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
69
Property
Total
GLA
in
square
feet
Owned
share
of
total
GLA
in
square
feet
No.
of
tenants
Average
tenant
size
in
square
feet
Average
lease
term
remaining
in
years
Owned
share
vacant
in
square
feet
Occupancy
(1)
Owned
share
occupancy
in
square
feet
868,684
757,506
1,578,741
1,052,547
Franklin
Atrium,
Calgary
149,660
Airport
Corporate
Centre,
Calgary
149,327
2891
Sunridge
Way,
Calgary
Kensington
House,
Calgary
3115
-‐
12th
Street
NE,
Calgary
14505
Bannister
Road,
SE,
Calgary
Braithwaite
Boyle
Centre,
Calgary
Franklin
Building,
Calgary
2816
-‐
11th
Street
NE,
Calgary
Centre
70,
Calgary
(5)
Calgary
Suburban
Scotia
Plaza
(40
King
Street
West),
Toronto
(4)
Adelaide
Place,
Toronto
State
Street
Financial
Centre,
Toronto
AIR
MILES
Tower,
Toronto
655
Bay
Street,
Toronto
Scotia
Plaza
(44
King
Street
West),
Toronto
(4)
87,250
77,906
73,541
61,272
54,846
50,577
33,507
130,798
655,230
413,933
322,669
297,582
401,705
74
Victoria
St/137
Yonge
St,
Toronto
265,812
720
Bay
Street,
Toronto
36
Toronto
Street,
Toronto
18
King
Street
East,
Toronto
330
Bay
Street,
Toronto
100
Yonge
Street,
Toronto
(4)
20
Toronto
St/33
Victoria
St,
Toronto
8
King
Street
East,
Toronto
250
Dundas
Street
West,
Toronto
Victory
Building,
Toronto
425
Bloor
Street
East,
Toronto
212
King
Street
West,
Toronto
357
Bay
Street,
Toronto
360
Bay
Street,
Toronto
10
King
Street
East,
Toronto
350
Bay
Street,
Toronto
67
Richmond
Street
West,
Toronto
366
Bay
Street,
Toronto
49
Ontario
Street,
Toronto
(5)
56
Temperance
Street,
Toronto
247,743
214,054
231,811
161,892
242,645
157,852
148,142
121,593
101,421
83,527
73,277
63,529
57,744
57,476
52,796
50,158
36,371
87,105
32,338
149,660
149,327
87,250
77,906
73,541
61,272
54,846
50,577
33,507
19,620
655,230
413,933
322,669
297,582
267,817
265,812
247,743
214,054
231,811
161,892
161,771
157,852
148,142
121,593
101,421
83,527
73,277
63,529
57,744
57,476
52,796
50,158
36,371
34,842
32,338
8
11
4
16
12
4
7
3
3
41
109
65
72
9
20
23
1
5
1
34
28
38
14
29
46
19
44
9
10
25
16
21
13
5
11
2
8
17,332
11,609
21,813
4,783
4,757
15,318
5,916
16,859
6,111
2,720
7,067
24,148
8,734
45,993
15,981
12,652
401,705
53,162
247,743
6,128
8,277
3,533
17,302
5,351
2,865
6,400
2,183
8,066
7,328
1,982
3,243
2,637
3,747
10,032
2,902
43,553
3,621
3.29
5.09
3.92
2.15
4.12
5.22
2.81
2.93
2.82
3.48
3.76
8.01
4.23
8.24
3.93
4.13
12.50
5.85
6.01
3.78
2.88
3.51
6.89
4.97
3.26
4.54
3.62
2.81
8.05
2.01
3.06
3.34
3.04
2.32
2.40
3.05
2.26
11,001
21,626
92.6%
85.5%
138,659
127,701
-‐
100.0%
1,373
16,457
98.2%
77.6%
-‐
100.0%
13,437
75.5%
-‐
100.0%
15,173
2,891
54.7%
85.3%
87,250
76,533
57,084
61,272
41,409
50,577
18,334
16,729
81,958
89.2%
675,548
6,090
99.4%
1,046,457
26,381
96.0%
628,849
-‐
100.0%
413,933
3,044
6,579
-‐
-‐
-‐
99.1%
97.8%
319,625
291,003
100.0%
267,817
100.0%
265,812
100.0%
247,743
5,703
97.3%
208,351
54
100.0%
231,757
27,623
283
82.9%
99.8%
134,269
161,488
2,684
98.3%
155,168
16,337
89.0%
131,805
-‐
100.0%
121,593
5,370
10,936
94.7%
86.9%
-‐
100.0%
13,973
5,864
2,100
4,086
78.0%
89.8%
96.3%
92.3%
-‐
100.0%
4,453
87.8%
-‐
100.0%
96,051
72,591
73,277
49,556
51,880
55,376
48,710
50,158
31,918
34,842
3,374
89.6%
28,964
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
70
Property
10
Lower
Spadina
Avenue,
Toronto
(5)
Total
GLA
in
square
feet
Owned
share
of
total
GLA
in
square
feet
60,255
24,102
83
Yonge
Street,
Toronto
11,504
11,504
Toronto
Downtown
6,228,905
5,399,533
5915-‐5935
Airport
Road,
Mississauga
Aviva
Corporate
Centre,
Toronto
6655-‐6725
Airport
Road,
Mississauga
5001
Yonge
Street,
Toronto
2075
Kennedy
Road,
Toronto
5945-‐5955
Airport
Road,
Mississauga
50
Burnhamthorpe
Road
West,
Mississauga
(5)
30
Eglinton
Avenue
West,
Mississauga
401
&
405
The
West
Mall,
Toronto
(5)
300,
302
&
304
The
East
Mall,
Toronto
(5)
625
Cochrane
Drive,
Markham
Valleywood
Corporate
Centre,
Markham
90
Burnhamthorpe
Road
West,
Mississauga
(5)
185
The
West
Mall,
Toronto
(5)
2645
Skymark
Ave.,
Mississauga
6299
Airport
Road,
Mississauga
1020
Birchmount
Road,
Toronto
6303
Airport
Road,
Mississauga
195
The
West
Mall,
Toronto
191
The
West
Mall,
Toronto
586
Argus
Road,
Oakville
(5)
(5)
2810
Matheson
Boulevard
East,
Mississauga
(5)
6509
Airport
Road,
Mississauga
2550
Argentia
Road,
Mississauga
100
Gough
Road,
Markham
6501
Mississauga
Road,
(5)
Mississauga
2010
Winston
Park
Drive,
Oakville
(5)
6531
Mississauga
Road,
(5)
Mississauga
Average
tenant
size
in
square
feet
Average
lease
term
remaining
in
years
Owned
share
vacant
in
square
feet
No.
of
tenants
Occupancy
(1)
Owned
share
occupancy
in
square
feet
6
4
578
50
9
9
20
11
33
9,901
3.29
340
98.6%
23,762
2,876
10,519
7,283
39,158
36,819
15,301
16,568
3,870
5.15
5.77
4.78
2.72
1.56
3.27
2.53
4.59
-‐
100.0%
11,504
145,274
97.3%
5,254,259
129,682
73.7%
364,129
-‐
-‐
100.0%
352,425
100.0%
331,372
2,547
23,590
50,286
99.2%
88.5%
71.7%
306,021
182,245
127,699
493,811
493,811
352,425
331,372
308,568
205,835
177,985
352,425
331,372
308,568
205,835
177,985
350,997
175,148
33
9,168
5.32
24,178
86.2%
150,970
165,012
165,012
39
3,504
3.89
28,359
82.8%
136,653
411,842
326,389
162,792
154,774
164,737
162,868
162,792
154,774
23
25
13
13
17,906
11,340
12,522
11,490
4.17
4.66
4.05
3.45
-‐
100.0%
164,737
21,396
86.9%
141,472
-‐
100.0%
162,792
5,408
96.5%
149,366
304,750
152,070
18
13,690
5.80
29,106
80.9%
122,964
297,292
142,436
90,779
87,161
80,325
160,812
158,260
74,570
140,123
60,000
51,639
111,840
84,725
79,137
71,192
148,349
142,436
90,779
87,161
80,325
80,245
78,972
74,570
69,921
60,000
51,639
111,840
33,890
31,655
28,477
21
2
24
1
9
1
8
5
9
1
16
1
22
9
18
12,772
42,282
3,256
87,161
8,606
160,812
18,467
14,914
14,312
60,000
2,690
111,840
3,172
6,621
2,866
4.02
6.62
4.97
4.00
6.04
6.01
4.39
2.49
5.96
6.01
4.61
1.67
2.71
3.47
3.33
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
71
90.2%
133,840
14,509
57,872
12,633
59.4%
86.1%
-‐
100.0%
2,869
96.4%
-‐
100.0%
84,564
78,146
87,161
77,456
80,245
5,253
93.3%
73,719
-‐
100.0%
74,570
5,645
91.9%
64,276
-‐
100.0%
8,603
83.3%
60,000
43,036
-‐
100.0%
111,840
5,981
82.4%
27,909
7,819
7,845
75.3%
72.5%
23,836
20,632
Property
80
Whitehall
Drive,
Markham
(5)
3035
Orlando
Drive,
Mississauga
Total
GLA
in
square
feet
Owned
share
of
total
GLA
in
square
feet
60,805
16,754
24,322
16,754
Toronto
Suburban
5,514,402
4,218,732
956,725
956,725
Average
tenant
size
in
square
feet
Average
lease
term
remaining
in
years
Owned
share
vacant
in
square
feet
Occupancy
(1)
Owned
share
occupancy
in
square
feet
30,403
16,754
11,071
67,018
4.26
7.42
3.90
6.16
-‐
-‐
100.0%
24,322
100.0%
16,754
443,581
89.5%
3,775,151
18,472
98.1%
938,253
No.
of
tenants
2
1
446
14
717,160
717,160
1
717,160
11.25
-‐
100.0%
717,160
24,444
199,176
7.23
15.33
11,047
94.9%
205,326
-‐
100.0%
398,351
50
Queen
Street
North,
Kitchener
170,333
700
De
la
Gauchetière
Street
West,
Montréal
445
Opus
Industrial
Boulevard,
Mount
Juliet,
Nashville
275
Dundas
Street
West,
London
(5)
200
Chemin
Sainte-‐Foy,
Québec
City
Market
Square,
Kitchener
100
Frederick
Street,
Kitchener
1
Riverside
Drive,Windsor
55
King
Street
West,
Kitchener
235
King
Street
East,
Kitchener
22
Frederick
Street,
Kitchener
Accelerator
Building,
Waterloo
180
Keil
Drive
South,
Chatham
70
King
Street
East,
Kitchener
2450
Rue
Girouard,
Saint-‐Hyacinthe
12800
Foster
Street,
Overland
Park
400
Cumberland
Road,
Ottawa
2200-‐2204
Walkley
Road,
Ottawa
130
Slater
Street,
Ottawa
900
Place
D'Youville,
Québec
City
Gateway
Business
Park,
Ottawa
1125
Innovation
Drive,
Ottawa
150
Metcalfe
Street,
Ottawa
22
Varennes
Street,
Gatineau
540,933
398,351
241,341
239,428
235,915
126,075
100,797
95,855
92,862
36,927
9,485
174,322
158,898
122,906
122,671
120,995
115,771
109,003
107,783
360
Laurier
Avenue
West,
Ottawa
107,298
580
Rue
Grande
Allée,
Québec
City
250
King
Street,
Fredericton
277
Pleasant
Street,
Dartmouth
90,777
80,162
76,527
219
Laurier
Avenue
West,
Ottawa
(5)
187,783
8550
Newman
Boulevard,
Montréal
66,397
236
Brownlow
Avenue,
Dartmouth
2625
Queensview
Drive,
Ottawa
1305
Chemin
Sainte-‐Foy,
Québec
City
Seven
Capella
Court,
Ottawa
111
Ilsley
Avenue,
Dartmouth
60,739
46,156
36,542
31,362
27,428
231,500
231,500
185,178
185,178
1
185,178
5.92
216,373
398,351
241,341
239,428
235,915
170,333
126,075
100,797
95,855
92,862
36,927
9,485
21
2
20
15
7
12
12
3
16
4
1
1
1
11,910
13,617
28,557
12,975
9,514
25,694
4,586
23,216
36,927
9,485
3.87
3.70
6.92
2.78
4.31
4.55
2.78
7.41
3.33
4.29
231,500
11.23
174,322
158,898
122,906
122,671
120,995
115,771
109,003
107,783
107,298
90,777
80,162
76,527
75,113
66,397
60,739
46,156
36,542
31,362
27,428
3
3
25
4
38
4
22
1
7
16
3
5
5
6
1
5
8
1
5
58,107
52,966
4,451
30,109
3,151
28,943
4,827
107,783
15,328
3,938
26,721
12,868
37,557
9,440
21,430
9,231
3,556
31,362
4,721
2.02
2.74
3.44
10.25
4.11
6.05
3.62
2.84
3.19
2.09
4.75
3.27
1.44
2.01
2.00
3.60
7.99
0.33
1.90
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
72
3,135
35,176
36,015
14,632
11,904
23,716
22,480
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
11,625
2,237
1,253
98.7%
85.3%
84.7%
91.4%
90.6%
76.5%
76.5%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
238,206
204,252
199,900
155,701
114,171
77,081
73,375
92,862
36,927
9,485
100.0%
231,500
100.0%
185,178
100.0%
174,322
100.0%
158,898
90.5%
98.2%
99.0%
111,281
120,434
119,742
-‐
100.0%
115,771
2,814
97.4%
106,189
-‐
-‐
100.0%
107,783
100.0%
107,298
27,776
69.4%
63,001
-‐
100.0%
12,188
84.1%
-‐
100.0%
9,759
39,309
85.3%
35.3%
-‐
100.0%
8,091
77.9%
-‐
3,822
100.0%
86.1%
80,162
64,339
75,113
56,638
21,430
46,156
28,451
31,362
23,606
Total
GLA
in
square
feet
Owned
share
of
total
GLA
in
square
feet
No.
of
tenants
Average
tenant
size
in
square
feet
Average
lease
term
remaining
in
years
Owned
share
vacant
in
square
feet
Occupancy
(1)
Owned
share
occupancy
in
square
feet
32,788
25,968
25
932
4.37
7,521
71.0%
18,447
47,016
22,333
23,461
22,333
50,945
20,378
11,754
7,444
8.16
0.58
50,945
13.59
-‐
-‐
-‐
100.0%
23,461
100.0%
22,333
100.0%
20,378
Property
700
De
la
Gauchetière
Street
West,
Montréal
680
Broadway
Street,
Tillsonburg
(5)
141
Saint
Jean
Street,
Québec
City
460
Two
Nations
Crossing,
(5)
Fredericton
117
Kearney
Lake
Road,
Halifax
(5)
55
Norfolk
Street
South,
Simcoe
(5)
36,353
12,887
12,724
5,155
2,555
12,887
6,424,707
5,895,174
340
17,941
3.85
2.16
6.66
1,097
91.4%
11,627
-‐
100.0%
5,155
304,069
94.8%
5,591,105
27,627,693
24,222,661
2,216
11,592
4.96
1,701,201
93.0%
22,521,461
Eastern
Canada
(2)
(3)
Total
4
3
1
13
1
(1) Occupancy
includes
in-‐place
and
committed.
(2)
Includes
properties
in
southwestern
Ontario
and
U.S.
(3) Excludes
redevelopment
properties
and
held
for
sale
properties.
(4)
Investment
in
joint
venture.
(5) Co-‐owned
property.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
73
Owned
area
of
total
GLA
in
square
feet
Properties
City
Province
Largest
tenants
by
GLA
Tenant
Government
of
Canada
Bank
of
Nova
Scotia
1,423,259
2
Properties
1
Property
1
Property
4
Properties
1
Property
3
Properties
2
Properties
4
Properties
3
Properties
6
Properties
1
Property
1
Property
984,404
1
Property
1
Property
2
Properties
7
Properties
1
Property
2
Properties
2
Properties
Nissan
North
America
Inc.
717,160
445
Opus
Industrial
Boulevard
Government
of
Ontario
670,003
7
Properties
Government
of
Québec
Bell
Canada
1
Property
1
Property
663,922
1
Property
4
Properties
376,694
Northwest
Tower
350-‐450
Lansdowne
Enbridge
Place
Scotia
Plaza
Gateway
Business
Park
700
De
la
Gauchetière
Street
West
Government
of
Saskatchewan
343,001
6
Properties
Aviva
Canada
Inc.
Government
of
Alberta
Telus
1
Property
335,900
HSBC
Bank
Place
2200-‐2206
Eglinton
Avenue
East
304,079
8
Properties
3
Properties
287,803
2261
Keating
Cross
Road
Telus
Tower
Government
of
British
Columbia
287,747
Station
Tower
Intact
Financial
Corporation
263,214
2
Properties
4370
Dominion
Street
Richmond
Place
2261
Keating
Cross
Road
350-‐450
Lansdowne
IBM
Corporate
Park
2450
Girouard
Street
West
Enbridge
Pipelines
Inc.
State
Street
Trust
Company
248,577
Enbridge
Place
244,936
State
Street
Financial
Centre
18
King
Street
East
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
74
Yellowknife
Surrey
New
Westminster
Saskatoon
Regina
Calgary
Edmonton
Toronto
Kitchener
Ottawa
Gatineau
Windsor
Yellowknife
Calgary
Saskatoon
Toronto
Markham
Mississauga
Kitchener
Mount
Juliet
Toronto
Ottawa
Kitchener
Montreal
Québec
City
Yellowknife
Kamloops
Edmonton
Toronto
Ottawa
Montréal
Regina
Saskatoon
Edmonton
Toronto
Calgary
Edmonton
Victoria
Calgary
Surrey
New
Westminster
Burnaby
Richmond
Victoria
Kamloops
Calgary
Saint-‐Hyacinthe
Edmonton
Toronto
Toronto
Northwest
Territories
British
Columbia
British
Columbia
Saskatchewan
Saskatchewan
Alberta
Alberta
Ontario
Ontario
Ontario
Québec
Ontario
Northwest
Territories
Alberta
Saskatchewan
Ontario
Ontario
Ontario
Ontario
Tennessee,
U.S.
Ontario
Ontario
Ontario
Quebec
Quebec
Northwest
Territories
British
Columbia
Alberta
Ontario
Ontario
Québec
Saskatchewan
Saskatchewan
Alberta
Ontario
Alberta
Alberta
British
Columbia
Alberta
British
Columbia
British
Columbia
British
Columbia
British
Columbia
British
Columbia
British
Columbia
Alberta
Québec
Alberta
Ontario
Ontario
Tenant
Winners
Merchants
International
TD
Canada
Trust
Owned
area
of
total
GLA
in
square
feet
Properties
219,685
1
Property
2
Properties
209,400
Saskatoon
Square
SNC-‐Lavalin
Inc.
Loyalty
Management
Newalta
Corporation
U.S.
Bank
National
Association
IBM
Canada
Ltd.
1914
Hamilton
Street
300,
302
&
304
The
East
Mall
55
King
Street
West
275
Dundas
Street
West
207,351
1
Property
1
Property
4
Properties
194,018
AIR
MILES
Tower
187,297
3
Properties
185,178
12800
Foster
Street
IBM
Corporate
Park
170,379
100
Gough
Road
5001
Yonge
Street
ATCO
Group
AON
Canada
Inc.
Dream
Office
Management
Corp.
168,169
2
Properties
166,609
700
De
la
Gauchetière
Street
West
160,096
2
Properties
1
Property
1
Property
1
Property
2
Properties
1
Property
5
Properties
2
Properties
5
Properties
1
Property
4
Properties
4
Properties
1
Property
1
Property
The
City
of
Edmonton
Government
of
Northwest
Territories
Cenovus
Energy
Inc.
Miller
Thomson
Daimler
Chrysler
Canada
Inc.
Borell
Management
Nautilus
Fitness
&
Racquet
Centre
Conex
Rental
Corp
&
Flint
Energy
Hatch
Optima
Ltd.
International
Financial
Data
Services
Stantec
Consulting
Ltd.
Minacs
Worldwide
Inc.
156,106
HSBC
Bank
Place
142,202
3
Properties
140,605
Rocky
Mountain
Plaza
137,149
Valleywood
Corporate
Centre
Accelerator
Building
Scotia
Plaza
132,500
1
Riverside
Drive
124,795
Scotia
Plaza
117,893
Market
Square
5
Properties
113,801
2
Properties
110,383
840
-‐
7th
Avenue
SW
107,490
State
Street
Financial
Centre
103,851
Station
Tower
Market
Square
2261
Keating
Cross
Road
103,658
6655-‐6725
Airport
Road
180
Keil
Drive
South
Government
of
New
Brunswick
Total
100,540
2
Properties
10,609,854
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
75
City
Toronto
Mississauga
Saskatoon
Regina
Toronto
Kitchener
London
Yellowknife
Calgary
Toronto
Toronto
Calgary
Overland
Park
Calgary
Markham
Toronto
Edmonton
Montréal
Yellowknife
Surrey
New
Westminster
Richmond
Saskatoon
Regina
Calgary
Edmonton
Toronto
Ottawa
Mississauga
Kitchener
Windsor
Montréal
Edmonton
Yellowknife
Calgary
Markham
Waterloo
Toronto
Windsor
Toronto
Kitchener
Toronto
Edmonton
Calgary
Toronto
Surrey
Kitchener
Victoria
Mississauga
Chatham
Fredericton
Province
Ontario
Ontario
Saskatchewan
Saskatchewan
Ontario
Ontario
Ontario
Northwest
Territories
Alberta
Ontario
Ontario
Alberta
Kansas,
U.S.
Alberta
Ontario
Ontario
Alberta
Québec
Northwest
Territories
British
Columbia
British
Columbia
British
Columbia
Saskatchewan
Saskatchewan
Alberta
Alberta
Ontario
Ontario
Ontario
Ontario
Ontario
Québec
Alberta
Northwest
Territories
Alberta
Ontario
Ontario
Ontario
Ontario
Ontario
Ontario
Ontario
Alberta
Alberta
Ontario
British
Columbia
Ontario
British
Columbia
Ontario
Ontario
New
Brunswick
Cumulative
gross
revenue
$109.2
million
Largest
tenants
by
annualized
gross
rent
(Includes
all
tenants
where
projected
annualized
gross
contract
rent
exceeds
$1.0
million)
Rank
Tenant
Cumulative
gross
revenue
Rank
Tenant
$385.5
million
$2.5
million
or
greater:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Bank
of
Nova
Scotia
Government
of
Canada
Government
of
Ontario
Bell
Canada
Government
of
Québec
Telus
Enbridge
Pipelines
Inc.
State
Street
Trust
Company
Government
of
Saskatchewan
Government
of
British
Columbia
Government
of
Alberta
Newalta
Corporation
Aviva
Canada
Inc.
Borell
Management
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
Loyalty
Management
SNC-‐Lavalin
Inc.
Dream
Office
Management
Corp.
Miller
Thomson
Government
of
Northwest
Territories
Cenovus
Energy
Winners
Merchants
International
Cassels
Brock
Blackwell
ATCO
Group
Daimler
Chrysler
Canada
Inc.
IBM
Canada
Ltd.
TD
Canada
Trust
The
City
of
Edmonton
AON
Canada
Inc.
Penn
West
Energy
Trust
International
Financial
Data
Services
Hatch
Optima
Ltd.
U.S.
Bank
National
Association
Intact
Financial
Corporation
Discovery
Parks
Holdings
Ltd.
Medcan
Health
Management
Inc.
Nissan
North
America
Inc.
Nautilus
Fitness
&
Racquet
Centre
Royal
Bank
of
Canada
Co-‐operators
Life
Insurance
The
Art
Institute
of
Vancouver
Stantec
Consulting
Ltd.
CIBC
Sage
Software
Canada
Ltd.
Bank
of
Montreal
Carswell
Between
$1.0
million
and
$2.5
million:
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
National
Bank
of
Canada
Conex
Rental
BDO
Dunwoody
Gemini
Corporation
Agence
Metropolitaine
de
Transport
Ensign
Resource
Service
Group
CB
Richard
Ellis
Limited
Minacs
Worldwide
Inc.
Livingston
International
Inc.
Great
West
Life
Assurance
Co.
Rogers
Communication
Inc.
DBRS
Bereskin
&
Parr
Management
MCAP
Services
Corporation
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
85.
86.
87.
88.
89.
90.
91.
92.
93.
94.
Encana
Corporation
Government
of
Nova
Scotia
Raymond
James
Ltd.
Mark
Anthony
Group
Maple
Leaf
Foods
Government
of
New
Brunswick
Delcan
Corporation
Cardinia
Real
Estate
Canada
Inc.
Visa
Canada
Reg.
Municipality
of
Waterloo
Canadian
Energy
Services
LP
CGI
Group
AMEC
Americas
Ltd
Energy
Edward
D.
Jones
&
Co.
Canadian
Western
Bank
Saskatchewan
Telecommunication
International
Civil
Aviation
Organization
Conexus
Credit
Union
Gardiner
Roberts
Toronto
Central
Community
Care
CAE
Professional
Services
Inc.
Johnson
Inc.
Trident
Exploration
Corp.
Standard
Lands
Co
Inc.
Care
Factor
Computer
Services
Yellow
Pages
Stewart
Weir
and
Co.
Wells
Fargo
Foothill
Canada
Exchange
Solutions
Inc.
Dutton
Brock
GCAN
Insurance
Company
Jardine
Lloyd
Thompson
Canada
IBI
Leaseholds
Bantrel
MKRT
Management
Corporation
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
76
Rank
Tenant
Cumulative
gross
revenue
Rank
Tenant
Cumulative
gross
revenue
95.
96.
97.
98.
99.
100.
101.
102.
103.
104.
105.
106.
107.
108.
109.
110.
111.
112.
113.
114.
115.
116.
117.
IMV
Projects
Inc.
Precision
Drilling
Corp
BHP
Billiton
Diamonds
Wardrop
Engineering
Inc.
Wawanesa
Mutual
Insurance
MLT
Management
Inc.
Technicolor
Creative
Services
Cambridge
Mercantile
Corp.
Ontario
Bar
Association
Family
Guidance
Group
Inc.
HSBC
Bank
Canada
Lafarge
Canada
Inc.
Trader
Corporation
Lindt
&
Sprungli
(Canada),
Inc.
The
Insurance
Institute
of
Canada
Sun
Life
Assurance
Company
Connor,
Clark
&
Lunn
Financial
City
of
Windsor
Gilliland,
Gold,
Young
Consulting
Inc.
Smart
&
Biggar
Management
Tartan
Engineering
The
Record
Inmet
Mining
Corporation
All
tenants
with
annualized
owned
rent
in
excess
of
$2.5
million:
Total
annualized
owned
net
rental
income
Total
annualized
owned
gross
rental
income
Total
GLA
in
square
feet
(owned
share)
Average
base
rent
(PSF)
Average
recoveries
(PSF)
Entire
owned
portfolio:
Total
annualized
owned
net
rental
income
Total
annualized
owned
gross
rental
income
Total
occupied
and
committed
GLA
in
square
feet
Average
base
rent
(PSF)
Average
recoveries
(PSF)
$208.1
million
$385.5
million
11,191,536
$18.60
$15.85
$410.4
million
$781.9
million
22,521,461
$18.22
$16.50
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
77
By
contractual
rent
21.6%
17.5%
17.4%
8.0%
5.8%
2.7%
5.2%
3.5%
3.3%
15.0%
100.0%
Portfolio
tenant
base
(by
NAICS
codes)
Sector
Finance
and
Insurance
Public
Administration
Professional,
Scientific
and
Technical
Services
Mining
and
Oil
and
Gas
Extraction
Information
and
Cultural
Industries
Manufacturing
Administrative
and
Support,
Waste
Management
and
Remediation
Services
Real
Estate
and
Rental
and
Leasing
Retail
Trade
Other
Total
By
contractual
rent
By
GLA
19.7%
18.1%
17.3%
6.5%
6.2%
5.6%
5.3%
3.0%
3.0%
15.3%
100.0%
Real
Estate
and
Rental
and
Leasing
3.5%
Retail
Trade
3.3%
Other
15.0%
Finance
and
Insurance
21.6%
Administrayve
and
Support,
Waste
Management
and
Remediayon
Services
5.2%
Manufacturing
2.7%
Informayon
and
Cultural
Industries
5.8%
Public
Administrayon
17.6%
Mining
and
Oil
and
Gas
Extracyon
8.0%
Professional,
Scienyfic
and
Technical
Services
17.4%
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
78
Management’s
responsibility
for
the
consolidated
financial
statements
The
accompanying
consolidated
financial
statements,
the
notes
thereto
and
other
financial
information
contained
in
this
Annual
Report
have
been
prepared
by,
and
are
the
responsibility
of,
the
management
of
Dream
Office
Real
Estate
Investment
Trust.
These
consolidated
financial
statements
have
been
prepared
in
accordance
with
International
Financial
Reporting
Standards,
using
management’s
best
estimates
and
judgments
when
appropriate.
The
Board
of
Trustees
is
responsible
for
ensuring
that
management
fulfills
its
responsibility
for
financial
reporting
and
internal
control.
The
audit
committee,
which
comprises
trustees,
meets
with
management
as
well
as
the
external
auditors
to
satisfy
itself
that
management
is
properly
discharging
its
financial
responsibilities
and
to
review
its
consolidated
financial
statements
and
the
report
of
the
auditors.
The
audit
committee
reports
its
findings
to
the
Board
of
Trustees,
which
approves
the
consolidated
financial
statements.
PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP,
the
independent
auditors,
have
audited
the
consolidated
financial
statements
in
accordance
with
Canadian
generally
accepted
auditing
standards.
The
auditors
have
full
and
unrestricted
access
to
the
audit
committee,
with
or
without
management
present.
P.
Jane
Gavan
Chief
Executive
Officer
Mario
Barrafato
Chief
Financial
Officer
Toronto,
Ontario,
February
19,
2015
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
79
Independent
auditor’s
report
To
the
Unitholders
of
Dream
Office
Real
Estate
Investment
Trust
We
have
audited
the
accompanying
consolidated
financial
statements
of
Dream
Office
Real
Estate
Investment
Trust
and
its
subsidiaries,
which
comprise
the
consolidated
balance
sheets
as
at
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013
and
the
consolidated
statements
of
comprehensive
income,
changes
in
equity
and
cash
flows
for
the
years
then
ended,
and
the
related
notes,
which
comprise
a
summary
of
significant
accounting
policies
and
other
explanatory
information.
Management’s
responsibility
for
the
consolidated
financial
statements
Management
is
responsible
for
the
preparation
and
fair
presentation
of
these
consolidated
financial
statements
in
accordance
with
International
Financial
Reporting
Standards,
and
for
such
internal
control
as
management
determines
is
necessary
to
enable
the
preparation
of
consolidated
financial
statements
that
are
free
from
material
misstatement,
whether
due
to
fraud
or
error.
Auditor’s
responsibility
Our
responsibility
is
to
express
an
opinion
on
these
consolidated
financial
statements
based
on
our
audits.
We
conducted
our
audits
in
accordance
with
Canadian
generally
accepted
auditing
standards.
Those
standards
require
that
we
comply
with
ethical
requirements
and
plan
and
perform
the
audit
to
obtain
reasonable
assurance
about
whether
the
consolidated
financial
statements
are
free
from
material
misstatement.
An
audit
involves
performing
procedures
to
obtain
audit
evidence
about
the
amounts
and
disclosures
in
the
consolidated
financial
statements.
The
procedures
selected
depend
on
the
auditor’s
judgment,
including
the
assessment
of
the
risks
of
material
misstatement
of
the
consolidated
financial
statements,
whether
due
to
fraud
or
error.
In
making
those
risk
assessments,
the
auditor
considers
internal
control
relevant
to
the
entity’s
preparation
and
fair
presentation
of
the
consolidated
financial
statements
in
order
to
design
audit
procedures
that
are
appropriate
in
the
circumstances,
but
not
for
the
purpose
of
expressing
an
opinion
on
the
effectiveness
of
the
entity’s
internal
control.
An
audit
also
includes
evaluating
the
appropriateness
of
accounting
policies
used
and
the
reasonableness
of
accounting
estimates
made
by
management,
as
well
as
evaluating
the
overall
presentation
of
the
consolidated
financial
statements.
Opinion
We
believe
that
the
audit
evidence
we
have
obtained
in
our
audits
is
sufficient
and
appropriate
to
provide
a
basis
for
our
audit
opinion.
In
our
opinion,
the
consolidated
financial
statements
present
fairly,
in
all
material
respects,
the
financial
position
of
Dream
Office
Real
Estate
Investment
Trust
and
its
subsidiaries
as
at
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013
and
their
financial
performance
and
their
cash
flows
for
the
years
then
ended
in
accordance
with
International
Financial
Reporting
Standards.
Chartered
Professional
Accountants,
Licensed
Public
Accountants
Toronto,
Ontario,
February
19,
2015
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
80
December
31,
December
31,
Notes
2014
2013
$
$
$
8
9
10
11
12
20
13
14
15
23
16
13
17
19
19
19,
27
19
$
6,139,070
191,691
553,141
106,803
6,990,705
16,565
8,593
10,920
36,078
2,968
7,029,751
2,731,506
15,151
17,082
6,183
18,935
2,788,857
365,855
97,522
463,377
3,252,234
3,171,794
601,495
4,228
3,777,517
7,029,751
$
$
$
$
6,241,685
166,317
527,255
104,822
7,040,079
28,476
9,450
31,017
68,943
15,921
7,124,943
2,884,481
101,978
18,535
5,167
18,867
3,029,028
264,535
108,242
372,777
3,401,805
3,039,189
682,265
1,684
3,723,138
7,124,943
Consolidated
balance
sheets
(in
thousands
of
Canadian
dollars)
Assets
NON-‐CURRENT
ASSETS
Investment
properties
Investment
in
Dream
Industrial
REIT
Investment
in
joint
ventures
Other
non-‐current
assets
CURRENT
ASSETS
Amounts
receivable
Prepaid
expenses
and
other
assets
Cash
and
cash
equivalents
Assets
held
for
sale
Total
assets
Liabilities
NON-‐CURRENT
LIABILITIES
Debt
Subsidiary
redeemable
units
Deferred
Unit
Incentive
Plan
Deferred
tax
liabilities,
net
Other
non-‐current
liabilities
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
Debt
Amounts
payable
and
accrued
liabilities
Total
liabilities
Equity
Unitholders’
equity
Retained
earnings
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
income
Total
equity
Total
liabilities
and
equity
See
accompanying
notes
to
the
consolidated
financial
statements.
On
behalf
of
the
Board
of
Trustees
of
Dream
Office
Real
Estate
Investment
Trust:
JOANNE
FERSTMAN
Trustee
MICHAEL
J.
COOPER
Trustee
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
81
Note
$
9
10
25
21
21
8
22
32
23
27
27
Year
ended
December
31,
2014
705,279
(303,771)
401,508
$
2013
687,172
(295,672)
391,500
15,965
37,611
3,199
56,775
15,697
84,382
4,635
104,714
(24,393)
(23,859)
(134,952)
(4,638)
(2,970)
(166,953)
(124,303)
2,749
(9,848)
(131,402)
159,928
(638)
159,290
(130,169)
(7,897)
(2,527)
(164,452)
85,745
34,840
(6,992)
113,593
445,355
(344)
445,011
(666)
3,210
2,544
161,834
$
39
1,942
1,981
446,992
$
Consolidated
statements
of
comprehensive
income
(in
thousands
of
Canadian
dollars)
Investment
properties
revenue
Investment
properties
operating
expenses
Net
rental
income
Other
income
Share
of
net
income
and
dilution
gain
(loss)
from
investment
in
Dream
Industrial
REIT
Share
of
net
income
from
investment
in
joint
ventures
Interest
and
fee
income
Other
expenses
General
and
administrative
Interest:
Debt
Subsidiary
redeemable
units
Amortization
of
external
management
contracts
and
depreciation
on
property
and
equipment
Fair
value
adjustments,
net
gains
(losses)
on
transactions
and
other
activities
Fair
value
adjustments
to
investment
properties
Fair
value
adjustments
to
financial
instruments
Net
gains
(losses)
on
transactions
and
other
activities
Income
before
income
taxes
Deferred
income
taxes
Net
income
for
the
year
Other
comprehensive
income
(loss)
Items
that
will
be
reclassified
subsequently
to
net
income:
Unrealized
gain
(loss)
on
interest
rate
swaps
Unrealized
foreign
currency
translation
gain
Comprehensive
income
for
the
year
See
accompanying
notes
to
the
consolidated
financial
statements.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
82
Consolidated
statements
of
changes
in
equity
(in
thousands
of
Canadian
dollars,
except
for
number
of
units)
Attributable
to
unitholders
of
the
Trust
Accumulated
other
Number
of
Unitholdersʼ
Retained
comprehensive
Year
ended
December
31,
2014
Balance
at
January
1,
2014
Net
income
for
the
year
Distributions
paid
Distributions
payable
Distribution
Reinvestment
Plan
Unit
Purchase
Plan
Deferred
units
exchanged
for
REIT
A
Units
REIT
B
Units
exchanged
for
REIT
A
Units
Cancellation
of
REIT
A
Units
Conversion
of
debentures
Conversion
feature
on
converted
debentures
Issue
costs
Other
comprehensive
income
Balance
at
December
31,
2014
Note
REIT
A
Units
103,420,221
$
-‐
-‐
-‐
2,236,530
4,765
157,608
2,936,023
(832,200)
13,628
-‐
-‐
-‐
18
18
19
19
15
19
19
19
27
107,936,575
$
equity
3,039,189
-‐
-‐
-‐
63,248
135
4,338
85,350
(20,924)
500
(7)
(35)
-‐
3,171,794
$
$
earnings
682,265
159,290
(219,667)
(20,393)
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
601,495
$
$
income
1,684
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
2,544
4,228
$
$
Total
equity
3,723,138
159,290
(219,667)
(20,393)
63,248
135
4,338
85,350
(20,924)
500
(7)
(35)
2,544
3,777,517
Attributable
to
unitholders
of
the
Trust
Accumulated
other
Year
ended
December
31,
2013
Balance
at
January
1,
2013
Net
income
for
the
year
Distributions
paid
Distributions
payable
Public
offering
of
REIT
A
Units
Distribution
Reinvestment
Plan
Unit
Purchase
Plan
Deferred
units
exchanged
for
REIT
A
Units
Cancellation
of
REIT
A
Units
Issue
costs
Other
comprehensive
income
Balance
at
December
31,
2013
Number
of
Unitholdersʼ
Retained
comprehensive
Note
REIT
A
Units
97,634,941
$
-‐
-‐
-‐
6,353,750
1,509,148
12,212
44,970
(2,134,800)
-‐
-‐
18
18
19
19
19
15
19
27
103,420,221
$
equity
2,829,662
-‐
-‐
-‐
230,006
47,899
429
1,641
(60,665)
(9,783)
-‐
3,039,189
$
$
earnings
467,034
445,011
(210,287)
(19,493)
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
682,265
$
$
income
(loss)
(297)
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
1,981
1,684
$
$
Total
equity
3,296,399
445,011
(210,287)
(19,493)
230,006
47,899
429
1,641
(60,665)
(9,783)
1,981
3,723,138
See
accompanying
notes
to
the
consolidated
financial
statements.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
83
Consolidated
statements
of
cash
flows
(in
thousands
of
Canadian
dollars)
Generated
from
(utilized
in)
operating
activities
Net
income
for
the
year
Non-‐cash
items:
Share
of
net
income
and
dilution
gain
(loss)
from
investment
in
Dream
Industrial
REIT
Share
of
net
income
from
investment
in
joint
ventures
Amortization
and
depreciation
Fair
value
adjustments
to
investment
properties
Fair
value
adjustments
to
financial
instruments
Other
adjustments
Investment
in
lease
incentives
and
initial
direct
leasing
costs
Interest
paid
on
subsidiary
redeemable
units
Change
in
non-‐cash
working
capital
Generated
from
(utilized
in)
investing
activities
Investment
in
building
improvements
Acquisition
of
investment
properties
Acquisition
deposits
on
investment
properties
Acquisition
of
equity
accounted
investments
Net
proceeds
from
disposal
of
investment
properties
Net
proceeds
from
disposal
of
equity
accounted
investments
Investment
in
property
and
equipment
Distributions
from
investment
in
Dream
Industrial
REIT
Net
distributions
from
investment
in
joint
ventures
Repayment
of
promissory
notes
receivable
Change
in
restricted
cash
Generated
from
(utilized
in)
financing
activities
Borrowings
Principal
repayments
Lump
sum
repayments
Financing
costs
Distributions
paid
on
Units
Interest
paid
on
subsidiary
redeemable
units
Cancellation
of
REIT
A
Units
REIT
A
Units
issued
for
cash
Debt
settlement
and
REIT
A
Units
issue
costs
Increase
(decrease)
in
cash
and
cash
equivalents
Foreign
exchange
gain
on
cash
held
in
foreign
currency
Cash
and
cash
equivalents,
beginning
of
year
Cash
and
cash
equivalents,
end
of
year
See
accompanying
notes
to
the
consolidated
financial
statements.
Notes
Year
ended
December
31,
2013
2014
$
159,290
$
445,011
9
10
26
8
22
26
21,
26
26
7
13
13
13
13
18
21,
26
19
19
$
(15,965)
(37,611)
11,287
124,303
(2,749)
3,081
(49,116)
5,186
5,648
203,354
(31,255)
-‐
-‐
-‐
14,957
12,843
(1,367)
11,795
11,725
-‐
(942)
17,756
460,054
(67,135)
(427,501)
(3,007)
(175,912)
(5,186)
(20,924)
135
(1,927)
(241,403)
(20,293)
196
31,017
10,920
$
(15,697)
(84,382)
5,399
(85,745)
(34,840)
(1,933)
(31,034)
7,524
(9,066)
195,237
(26,903)
(485,060)
(15,813)
(33,021)
11,469
-‐
(4,876)
10,345
2,700
42,000
(452)
(499,611)
1,197,881
(65,837)
(788,269)
(4,492)
(180,444)
(7,524)
(60,665)
230,435
(9,783)
311,302
6,928
75
24,014
31,017
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
84
Notes
to
the
consolidated
financial
statements
(All
dollar
amounts
in
thousands
of
Canadian
dollars,
except
for
unit
or
per
unit
amounts)
Note
1
ORGANIZATION
Dream
Office
Real
Estate
Investment
Trust
(“Dream
Office
REIT”
or
the
“Trust”),
formerly
known
as
Dundee
REIT,
is
an
open-‐
ended
investment
trust
created
pursuant
to
a
Declaration
of
Trust,
as
amended
and
restated,
under
the
laws
of
the
Province
of
Ontario.
The
consolidated
financial
statements
of
Dream
Office
REIT
include
the
accounts
of
Dream
Office
REIT
and
its
consolidated
subsidiaries.
Dream
Office
REIT’s
portfolio
comprises
office
properties
located
in
urban
centres
across
Canada
and
the
United
States
(“U.S.”).
A
subsidiary
of
Dream
Office
REIT
performs
the
property
management
function.
The
Trust’s
registered
office
is
30
Adelaide
Street
East,
Suite
1600,
Toronto,
Ontario,
Canada
M5C
3H1.
The
Trust
is
listed
on
the
Toronto
Stock
Exchange
under
the
symbol
“D.UN”.
Dream
Office
REIT’s
consolidated
financial
statements
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
were
authorized
for
issuance
by
the
Board
of
Trustees
on
February
19,
2015,
after
which
they
may
only
be
amended
with
the
Board
of
Trustees’
approval.
For
simplicity,
throughout
the
Notes,
reference
is
made
to
the
units
of
the
Trust
as
follows:
• “REIT
A
Units”,
meaning
the
REIT
Units,
Series
A
• “REIT
B
Units”,
meaning
the
REIT
Units,
Series
B
• “REIT
Units”,
meaning
the
REIT
Units,
Series
A,
and
REIT
Units,
Series
B,
collectively
• “Units”,
meaning
REIT
Units,
Series
A,
REIT
Units,
Series
B,
and
Special
Trust
Units,
collectively
• “subsidiary
redeemable
units”,
meaning
the
LP
Class
B
Units,
Series
1,
limited
partnership
units
of
Dream
Office
LP
(formerly
known
as
Dundee
Properties
Limited
Partnership)
At
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013,
Dream
Unlimited
Corp.,
indirectly
through
its
subsidiaries,
held
773,939
REIT
A
Units
and
383,823
subsidiary
redeemable
units.
Note
2
SUMMARY
OF
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
The
principal
accounting
policies
applied
in
the
preparation
of
these
consolidated
financial
statements
are
set
out
below.
These
policies
have
been
consistently
applied
to
all
years
presented,
unless
otherwise
stated.
Basis
of
presentation
and
statement
of
compliance
The
consolidated
financial
statements
have
been
prepared
in
accordance
with
International
Financial
Reporting
Standards
(“IFRS”)
as
issued
by
the
International
Accounting
Standards
Board
(“IASB”).
Basis
of
consolidation
The
consolidated
financial
statements
comprise
the
financial
statements
of
Dream
Office
REIT
and
its
subsidiaries.
Subsidiaries
are
fully
consolidated
from
the
date
of
acquisition,
the
date
on
which
the
Trust
obtains
control,
and
continue
to
be
consolidated
until
the
date
such
control
ceases.
Control
exists
when
the
Trust
is
exposed
to,
or
has
rights
to,
variable
returns
from
its
involvement
with
the
entity
and
has
the
ability
to
affect
those
returns
through
its
power
over
the
entity.
All
intercompany
balances,
income
and
expenses,
and
unrealized
gains
and
losses
resulting
from
intercompany
transactions
are
eliminated
in
full.
Equity
accounted
investments
Equity
accounted
investments
are
investments
over
which
the
Trust
has
significant
influence,
but
not
control.
Generally,
the
Trust
is
considered
to
exert
significant
influence
when
it
holds
more
than
a
20%
interest
in
an
entity.
However,
determining
significant
influence
is
a
matter
of
judgment
and
specific
circumstances
and,
from
time
to
time,
the
Trust
may
hold
an
interest
of
more
than
20%
in
an
entity
without
exerting
significant
influence.
Conversely,
the
Trust
may
hold
an
interest
of
less
than
20%
and
exert
significant
influence
through
representation
on
the
Board
of
Trustees,
direction
of
management
or
through
contractual
agreements.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
85
The
financial
results
of
the
Trust’s
equity
accounted
investments
are
included
in
the
Trust’s
consolidated
financial
statements
using
the
equity
method,
whereby
the
investment
is
carried
on
the
consolidated
balance
sheets
at
cost,
adjusted
for
the
Trust’s
proportionate
share
of
post-‐acquisition
profits
and
losses
and
for
post-‐acquisition
changes
in
excess
of
the
Trust’s
carrying
amount
of
its
investment
over
the
net
assets
of
the
equity
accounted
investments,
less
any
identified
impairment
loss.
The
Trust’s
share
of
profits
and
losses
is
recognized
in
the
share
of
net
earnings
from
equity
accounted
investments
in
the
consolidated
statements
of
comprehensive
income.
Dilution
gains
and
losses
arising
from
changes
in
the
Trust’s
interest
in
equity
accounted
investments
are
recognized
in
earnings.
If
the
Trust’s
investment
is
reduced
to
zero,
additional
losses
are
not
provided
for,
and
a
liability
is
not
recognized,
unless
the
Trust
has
incurred
legal
or
constructive
obligations,
or
made
payments
on
behalf
of
the
equity
accounted
investment.
At
each
reporting
date,
the
Trust
evaluates
whether
there
is
objective
evidence
that
its
interest
in
an
equity
accounted
investment
is
impaired.
The
entire
carrying
amount
of
the
equity
accounted
investment
is
compared
to
the
recoverable
amount,
which
is
the
higher
of
the
value-‐in-‐use
or
fair
value
less
costs
to
sell.
The
recoverable
amount
of
each
investment
is
considered
separately.
Where
the
Trust
transacts
with
its
equity
accounted
investments,
unrealized
profits
and
losses
are
eliminated
to
the
extent
of
the
Trust’s
interest
in
the
investment.
Balances
outstanding
between
the
Trust
and
equity
accounted
investments
in
which
it
has
an
interest
are
not
eliminated
in
the
consolidated
balance
sheets.
Joint
arrangements
The
Trust
enters
into
joint
arrangements
via
joint
operations
and
joint
ventures.
A
joint
arrangement
is
a
contractual
arrangement
pursuant
to
which
the
Trust
and
other
parties
undertake
an
economic
activity
that
is
subject
to
joint
control,
whereby
the
strategic
financial
and
operating
policy
decisions
relating
to
the
activities
of
the
joint
arrangement
require
the
unanimous
consent
of
the
parties
sharing
control,
and
that
is
referred
to
as
joint
operations.
Joint
arrangements
that
involve
the
establishment
of
a
separate
entity
in
which
each
party
to
the
venture
has
rights
to
the
net
assets
of
the
arrangements
are
referred
to
as
joint
ventures.
In
a
co-‐ownership
arrangement
the
Trust
owns
jointly
one
or
more
investment
properties
with
another
party
and
has
direct
rights
to
the
investment
property,
and
obligations
for
the
liabilities
relating
to
the
co-‐ownership.
The
Trust
reports
its
interests
in
joint
ventures
using
the
equity
method
of
accounting
as
previously
described
under
“Equity
accounted
investments”.
The
Trust
reports
its
interests
in
co-‐ownerships
as
joint
operations
by
accounting
for
its
share
of
the
assets,
liabilities,
revenues
and
expenses.
Under
this
method,
the
Trust’s
consolidated
financial
statements
reflect
only
the
Trust’s
proportionate
share
of
the
assets,
its
share
of
any
liabilities
incurred
jointly
with
the
other
venturers
as
well
as
any
liabilities
incurred
directly,
its
share
of
any
revenues
earned
or
expenses
incurred
by
the
joint
operation
and
any
expenses
incurred
directly.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
86
Note
3
ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
SELECTED
AND
APPLIED
FOR
SIGNIFICANT
TRANSACTIONS
AND
EVENTS
The
significant
accounting
policies
used
in
the
preparation
of
these
consolidated
financial
statements
are
described
below:
Investment
properties
Investment
properties
are
initially
recorded
at
cost,
including
related
transaction
costs
in
connection
with
asset
acquisitions
and
include
office
properties
held
to
earn
rental
income
and/or
for
capital
appreciation
and
properties
that
are
being
constructed
or
developed
for
future
use
as
investment
properties.
Subsequent
to
initial
recognition,
investment
properties
are
accounted
for
at
fair
value.
Investment
properties
and
properties
under
development
are
measured
at
fair
value,
determined
based
on
available
market
evidence,
at
the
consolidated
balance
sheet
dates.
Related
fair
value
gains
and
losses
are
recorded
in
comprehensive
income
in
the
period
in
which
they
arise.
The
fair
value
of
each
investment
property
is
based
on,
among
other
things,
rental
income
from
current
leases
and
assumptions
about
rental
income
from
future
leases
reflecting
market
conditions
at
the
consolidated
balance
sheet
dates,
less
future
estimated
cash
outflows
in
respect
of
such
properties.
To
determine
fair
value,
the
Trust
first
considers
whether
it
can
use
current
prices
in
an
active
market
for
a
similar
property
in
the
same
location
and
condition,
which
is
subject
to
similar
leases
and
other
contracts.
The
Trust
has
concluded
there
is
insufficient
market
evidence
on
which
to
base
investment
property
valuation
using
this
approach,
and
has
therefore
determined
that
using
the
income
approach
is
more
appropriate.
The
income
approach
is
one
in
which
the
fair
value
is
estimated
by
capitalizing
the
net
rental
income
that
the
property
can
reasonably
be
expected
to
produce
over
its
remaining
economic
life.
The
income
approach
is
derived
from
the
overall
capitalization
rate
method,
whereby
the
net
operating
income
is
capitalized
at
the
requisite
overall
capitalization
rate.
Active
properties
under
development
are
measured
using
a
discounted
cash
flow
model,
net
of
costs
to
complete,
as
of
the
consolidated
balance
sheet
dates.
Development
sites
in
the
planning
phases
are
measured
using
comparable
market
prices
for
similar
assets.
The
initial
cost
of
properties
under
development
includes
the
acquisition
cost
of
the
property,
direct
development
costs,
realty
taxes
and
borrowing
costs
directly
attributable
to
properties
under
development.
Borrowing
costs
associated
with
direct
expenditures
on
properties
under
development
are
capitalized.
The
amount
of
capitalized
borrowing
costs
is
determined
first
by
reference
to
project-‐specific
borrowings,
where
relevant,
and
otherwise
by
applying
a
weighted
average
cost
of
borrowings
to
eligible
expenditures
after
adjusting
for
borrowings
associated
with
other
specific
developments.
Where
borrowings
are
associated
with
specific
developments,
the
amount
capitalized
is
the
gross
cost
incurred
on
those
borrowings
less
any
investment
income
arising
on
their
temporary
investment.
Borrowing
costs
are
capitalized
from
the
commencement
of
the
development
until
the
date
of
practical
completion
when
the
property
is
substantially
ready
for
its
intended
use
or
sale.
The
capitalization
of
borrowing
costs
is
suspended
if
there
are
prolonged
periods
when
development
activity
is
interrupted.
Practical
completion
is
when
the
property
is
capable
of
operating
in
the
manner
intended
by
management.
Generally,
this
occurs
on
completion
of
construction
and
receipt
of
all
necessary
occupancy
and
other
material
permits.
If
the
Trust
has
pre-‐leased
space
at
or
prior
to
the
start
of
the
development,
and
the
lease
requires
tenant
improvements
that
enhance
the
value
of
the
property,
practical
completion
is
considered
to
occur
when
such
improvements
are
completed.
Initial
direct
leasing
costs
incurred
in
negotiating
and
arranging
tenant
leases
are
added
to
the
carrying
amount
of
investment
properties.
Lease
incentives,
which
include
costs
incurred
to
make
leasehold
improvements
to
tenants’
space
and
cash
allowances
provided
to
tenants,
are
added
to
the
carrying
amount
of
investment
properties
and
are
amortized
on
a
straight-‐line
basis
over
the
term
of
the
lease
as
a
reduction
of
investment
properties
revenue.
Internal
leasing
costs
are
expensed
in
the
period
that
they
are
incurred.
Segment
reporting
A
reportable
operating
segment
is
a
distinguishable
component
of
the
Trust
that
is
engaged
either
in
providing
related
products
or
services
(business
segment)
or
in
providing
products
or
services
within
a
particular
economic
environment
(geographical
segment),
which
is
subject
to
risks
and
rewards
that
are
different
from
those
of
other
reportable
segments.
The
Trust’s
primary
format
for
segment
reporting
is
based
on
business
segments.
The
business
segments,
office
properties,
are
based
on
the
Trust’s
management
and
internal
reporting
structure.
Operating
segments
are
reported
in
a
manner
consistent
with
the
internal
reporting
provided
to
the
chief
operating
decision-‐maker,
determined
to
be
the
Chief
Executive
Officer
(“CEO”)
of
the
Trust.
The
operating
segments
derive
their
revenue
primarily
from
rental
income
from
lessees.
All
of
the
Trust’s
business
activities
and
operating
segments
are
reported
within
the
office
property
segments.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
87
Other
non-‐current
assets
Other
non-‐current
assets
include
property
and
equipment,
deposits,
restricted
cash,
straight-‐line
rent
receivables,
external
management
contracts
and
goodwill.
Property
and
equipment
are
stated
at
cost
less
accumulated
depreciation
and
accumulated
impairment
losses.
Depreciation
of
property
and
equipment
is
calculated
using
the
straight-‐line
method
to
allocate
their
cost,
net
of
their
residual
values,
over
their
expected
useful
lives
of
four
to
ten
years.
The
residual
values
and
useful
lives
of
all
assets
are
reviewed
and
adjusted,
if
appropriate,
at
least
at
each
financial
year-‐end.
Cost
includes
expenditures
that
are
directly
attributable
to
the
acquisition
and
expenditures
for
replacing
part
of
the
property
and
equipment
when
that
cost
is
incurred,
if
the
recognition
criteria
are
met.
Subsequent
costs
are
included
in
the
asset’s
carrying
amount
or
recognized
as
a
separate
asset,
as
appropriate,
only
when
it
is
probable
that
future
economic
benefits
associated
with
the
item
will
flow
to
the
Trust
and
the
cost
of
the
item
can
be
measured
reliably.
All
other
repairs
and
maintenance
are
charged
to
comprehensive
income
during
the
financial
period
in
which
they
are
incurred.
Other
non-‐current
assets
are
derecognized
on
disposal
or
when
no
future
economic
benefits
are
expected
from
their
use
or
disposal.
Any
gain
or
loss
arising
on
derecognition
of
an
asset
(calculated
as
the
difference
between
the
net
disposal
proceeds
and
the
carrying
amount
of
the
asset)
is
included
in
the
consolidated
statements
of
comprehensive
income
in
the
year
the
asset
is
derecognized.
Revenue
recognition
The
Trust
accounts
for
tenant
leases
as
operating
leases
given
that
it
has
retained
substantially
all
of
the
risks
and
benefits
of
ownership
of
its
investment
properties.
Revenues
from
investment
properties
include
base
rents,
recoveries
of
operating
expenses
including
property
taxes,
percentage
participation
rents,
lease
termination
fees,
parking
income
and
incidental
income.
Revenue
recognition
under
a
lease
commences
when
the
tenant
has
a
right
to
use
the
leased
asset.
The
total
amount
of
contractual
rent
to
be
received
from
operating
leases
is
recognized
on
a
straight-‐line
basis
over
the
term
of
the
lease;
a
straight-‐line
rent
receivable,
which
is
included
in
other
non-‐current
assets,
is
recorded
for
the
difference
between
the
rental
revenue
recognized
and
the
contractual
amount
received.
Recoveries
from
tenants
are
recognized
as
revenues
in
the
period
in
which
the
corresponding
costs
are
incurred
and
collectability
reasonably
assured.
Percentage
participation
rents
are
recognized
on
an
accrual
basis
once
tenant
sales
revenues
exceed
contractual
thresholds.
Other
revenues
are
recorded
as
earned.
Business
combinations
The
purchase
method
of
accounting
is
used
for
acquisitions
meeting
the
definition
of
a
business.
The
consideration
transferred
in
a
business
combination
is
measured
at
fair
value,
which
is
calculated
as
the
sum
of
the
acquisition
date
fair
values
of
the
assets
transferred
by
the
acquirer,
the
liabilities
incurred
by
the
acquirer
to
former
owners
of
the
acquiree,
and
the
equity
interests
issued
by
the
acquirer.
Identifiable
assets
acquired
and
liabilities
and
contingent
liabilities
assumed
in
a
business
combination
are
measured
initially
at
their
acquisition
date
fair
values
irrespective
of
the
extent
of
any
minority
interest.
The
excess
of
the
cost
of
acquisition
over
the
fair
value
of
the
Trust’s
share
of
the
identifiable
net
assets
acquired
is
recorded
as
goodwill.
If
the
cost
of
acquisition
is
less
than
the
fair
value
of
the
Trust’s
share
of
the
net
assets
acquired,
the
difference
is
recognized
directly
in
the
profit
or
loss
for
the
year
as
an
acquisition
gain.
Any
transaction
costs
incurred
with
respect
to
the
business
combination
are
expensed
in
the
period
incurred.
Goodwill
Goodwill
arises
on
the
acquisition
of
businesses
and
represents
the
excess
of
the
consideration
transferred
over
and
above
the
Trust’s
interest
in
the
fair
value
of
the
net
identifiable
assets,
liabilities
and
contingent
liabilities
of
the
acquiree
and
the
fair
value
of
the
non-‐controlling
interest
in
the
acquiree.
For
the
purpose
of
impairment
testing,
goodwill
acquired
in
a
business
combination
is
allocated
to
each
of
the
cash-‐generating
units
or
groups
of
cash-‐generating
units
that
are
expected
to
benefit
from
the
synergies
of
the
combination.
Each
unit
or
group
of
units
to
which
the
goodwill
is
allocated
represents
the
lowest
level
within
the
entity
at
which
the
goodwill
is
monitored
for
internal
management
purposes.
Goodwill
is
monitored
by
the
Trust
at
the
geographical
segment
level.
Goodwill
impairment
reviews
are
undertaken
annually
or
more
frequently
if
events
or
changes
in
circumstances
indicate
a
potential
impairment.
The
carrying
value
of
goodwill
is
compared
to
the
recoverable
amount,
which
is
the
higher
of
value-‐in-‐use
and
the
fair
value
less
costs
to
sell.
Any
impairment
is
recognized
immediately
as
an
expense
and
is
not
subsequently
reversed.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
88
External
property
management
contracts
External
property
management
contracts
assumed
in
a
business
combination
are
recorded
on
the
consolidated
balance
sheets
and
arise
when
the
Trust
acquires
less
than
100%
of
an
investment
property,
but
manages
the
investment
property
and
earns
a
property
management
fee
from
the
co-‐owner.
External
property
management
contracts
are
in
place
as
long
as
the
property
is
co-‐owned
by
the
Trust
and
are
amortized
on
a
straight-‐line
basis
into
comprehensive
income
over
ten
years.
Distributions
Distributions
to
unitholders
are
recognized
as
a
liability
in
the
period
in
which
the
distributions
are
approved
by
the
Board
of
Trustees
and
are
recorded
as
a
reduction
of
retained
earnings.
Income
taxes
Dream
Office
REIT
is
taxed
as
a
mutual
fund
trust
for
Canadian
income
tax
purposes.
The
Trust
expects
to
distribute
all
of
its
taxable
income
to
its
unitholders,
which
enables
it
to
deduct
such
distributions
for
income
tax
purposes.
As
the
income
tax
obligations
relating
to
the
distributions
are
those
of
the
individual
unitholder,
no
provision
for
income
taxes
is
required
on
such
amounts.
The
Trust
expects
to
continue
to
distribute
its
taxable
income
and
to
qualify
as
a
real
estate
investment
trust
(“REIT”)
for
the
foreseeable
future.
For
U.S.
subsidiaries,
income
taxes
are
accounted
for
using
the
asset
and
liability
method.
Under
this
method,
deferred
income
taxes
are
recognized
for
the
expected
future
tax
consequences
of
temporary
differences
between
the
carrying
value
of
balance
sheet
items
and
their
corresponding
tax
values.
Deferred
income
taxes
are
computed
using
substantively
enacted
income
tax
rates
or
laws
for
the
years
in
which
the
temporary
differences
are
expected
to
reverse
or
settle.
Unit-‐based
compensation
plan
As
described
in
Note
15,
the
Trust
has
a
Deferred
Unit
Incentive
Plan
(“DUIP”)
that
provides
for
the
granting
of
deferred
trust
units
and
income
deferred
trust
units
to
trustees,
officers,
employees
and
affiliates
and
their
service
providers
(including
the
asset
manager).
Unvested
deferred
trust
units
are
recorded
as
a
liability,
and
compensation
expense
is
recognized
over
the
vesting
period
at
amortized
cost
based
on
the
fair
value
of
the
units.
Once
vested,
the
liability
is
remeasured
at
each
reporting
date
at
amortized
cost,
based
on
the
fair
value
of
the
corresponding
REIT
A
Units,
with
changes
in
fair
value
recognized
in
comprehensive
income
as
a
fair
value
adjustment
to
financial
instruments.
Deferred
trust
units
and
income
deferred
units
are
only
settled
in
REIT
A
Units.
Cash
and
cash
equivalents
Cash
and
cash
equivalents
include
all
short-‐term
investments
with
an
original
maturity
of
three
months
or
less,
and
exclude
cash
subject
to
restrictions
that
prevent
its
use
for
current
purposes.
Excluded
from
cash
and
cash
equivalents
are
amounts
held
for
repayment
of
tenant
security
deposits,
as
required
by
various
lending
agreements.
Deposits
are
included
in
other
non-‐current
assets.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
89
Financial
instruments
Designation
of
financial
instruments
The
following
summarizes
the
Trust’s
classification
and
measurement
of
financial
assets
and
financial
liabilities:
Financial
assets
Promissory
notes
receivable
Amounts
receivable
Restricted
cash
and
deposits
Cash
and
cash
equivalents
Financial
liabilities
Mortgages
Term
debt
Debentures
Subsidiary
redeemable
units
Deposits
Deferred
Unit
Incentive
Plan
Amounts
payable
and
accrued
liabilities
Distributions
payable
Convertible
debentures
–
host
instrument
Convertible
debentures
–
conversion
feature
Interest
rate
swaps
Classification
Measurement
Loans
and
receivables
Loans
and
receivables
Loans
and
receivables
Loans
and
receivables
Other
liabilities
Other
liabilities
Other
liabilities
Other
liabilities
Other
liabilities
Other
liabilities
Other
liabilities
Other
liabilities
Other
liabilities
Fair
value
through
profit
or
loss
Cash
flow
hedge
Amortized
cost
Amortized
cost
Amortized
cost
Amortized
cost
Amortized
cost
Amortized
cost
Amortized
cost
Amortized
cost
Amortized
cost
Amortized
cost
Amortized
cost
Amortized
cost
Amortized
cost
Fair
value
Fair
value
Financial
assets
The
Trust
classifies
its
non-‐derivative
financial
assets
with
fixed
or
determinable
payments
that
are
not
quoted
in
an
active
market
as
loans
and
receivables.
All
financial
assets
are
initially
measured
at
fair
value,
less
any
related
transaction
costs,
and
are
subsequently
measured
at
amortized
cost.
Amounts
receivable
are
initially
measured
at
fair
value
and
are
subsequently
measured
at
amortized
cost
less
provision
for
impairment.
A
provision
for
impairment
is
established
when
there
is
objective
evidence
that
collection
will
not
be
possible
under
the
original
terms
of
the
contract.
Indicators
of
impairment
include
payment
delinquency
and
significant
financial
difficulty
of
the
tenant.
The
carrying
amount
of
the
financial
asset
is
reduced
through
an
allowance
account,
and
the
amount
of
the
loss
is
recognized
in
the
consolidated
statements
of
comprehensive
income
within
investment
properties
operating
expenses.
Bad
debt
write-‐offs
occur
when
the
Trust
determines
collection
is
not
possible.
Any
subsequent
recoveries
of
amounts
previously
written
off
are
credited
against
investment
properties
operating
expenses
in
the
consolidated
statements
of
comprehensive
income.
Trade
receivables
that
are
less
than
three
months
past
due
are
not
considered
impaired
unless
there
is
evidence
collection
is
not
possible.
If
in
a
subsequent
period
when
the
amount
of
the
impairment
loss
decreases
and
the
decrease
can
be
related
objectively
to
an
event
occurring
after
the
impairment
was
recognized,
the
previously
recognized
impairment
loss
is
reversed
to
the
extent
that
the
carrying
amount
of
the
asset
does
not
exceed
its
amortized
cost
at
the
reversal
date.
Any
subsequent
reversal
of
an
impairment
loss
is
recognized
in
profit
or
loss.
Financial
assets
are
derecognized
only
when
the
contractual
rights
to
the
cash
flows
from
the
financial
asset
expire
or
the
Trust
transfers
substantially
all
risks
and
rewards
of
ownership.
Financial
liabilities
The
Trust
classifies
its
financial
liabilities
on
initial
recognition
as
either
fair
value
through
profit
or
loss
or
other
liabilities
measured
at
amortized
cost.
Financial
liabilities
are
initially
recognized
at
fair
value
less
related
transaction
costs.
Financial
liabilities
classified
as
other
liabilities
are
measured
at
amortized
cost
using
the
effective
interest
rate
method.
Under
the
effective
interest
rate
method,
any
transaction
fees,
costs,
discounts
and
premiums
directly
related
to
the
financial
liabilities
are
recognized
in
comprehensive
income
over
the
expected
life
of
the
debt.
The
Trust’s
financial
liabilities
that
are
classified
as
fair
value
through
profit
or
loss
are
initially
recognized
at
fair
value
and
are
subsequently
remeasured
at
fair
value
each
reporting
period,
with
changes
in
the
fair
value
recognized
in
comprehensive
income.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
90
Mortgages,
term
debt
and
debentures
are
initially
recognized
at
fair
value
less
related
transaction
costs,
or
at
fair
value
when
assumed
in
a
business
or
asset
acquisition.
Subsequent
to
initial
recognition,
mortgages
and
term
debt
are
recognized
at
amortized
cost.
Borrowing
costs
that
are
directly
attributable
to
investment
properties
under
development
are
capitalized.
On
issuance,
convertible
debentures
are
separated
into
two
financial
liability
components:
the
host
instrument
and
the
conversion
feature.
This
presentation
is
required
because
the
conversion
feature
permits
the
holder
to
convert
the
debenture
into
REIT
Units
that,
except
for
the
available
exemption
under
International
Accounting
Standard
(“IAS”)
32,
“Financial
Instruments:
Presentation”
(“IAS
32”),
would
normally
be
presented
as
a
financial
liability
because
of
the
redemption
feature
attached
to
the
REIT
A
Units.
Both
components
are
measured
based
on
their
respective
estimated
fair
values
at
the
date
of
issuance.
The
fair
value
of
the
host
instrument
is
net
of
any
related
transaction
costs.
The
fair
value
of
the
host
instrument
is
estimated
based
on
the
present
value
of
future
interest
and
principal
payments
due
under
the
terms
of
the
debenture
using
a
discount
rate
for
similar
debt
instruments
without
a
conversion
feature.
Subsequent
to
initial
recognition,
the
host
instrument
is
accounted
for
at
amortized
cost.
The
conversion
feature
is
accounted
for
at
fair
value
with
changes
in
fair
value
recognized
in
comprehensive
income
each
period.
When
the
holder
of
a
convertible
debenture
converts
its
interest
into
REIT
A
Units,
the
host
instrument
and
conversion
feature
are
reclassified
to
unitholders’
equity
in
proportion
to
the
units
converted
over
the
total
equivalent
units
outstanding.
Deferred
trust
units
and
the
subsidiary
redeemable
units
are
measured
at
amortized
cost
because
they
are
settled
in
REIT
A
Units
and
REIT
B
Units,
which
in
accordance
with
IAS
32
are
considered
liabilities.
Consequently,
the
deferred
units
and
subsidiary
redeemable
units
are
remeasured
each
reporting
period
based
on
the
fair
value
of
REIT
Units,
with
changes
in
the
liabilities
recorded
in
comprehensive
income.
Distributions
paid
on
subsidiary
redeemable
units
are
recorded
as
interest
expense
in
comprehensive
income.
A
financial
liability
is
derecognized
when
the
obligation
under
the
liability
is
discharged,
cancelled
or
expired.
Derivative
financial
instruments
and
hedging
activities
Derivative
financial
instruments
are
initially
recognized
at
fair
value
on
the
date
a
derivative
contract
is
entered
into
and
subsequently
remeasured
at
fair
value.
The
method
of
recognizing
the
resulting
gain
or
loss
depends
on
whether
the
derivative
financial
instrument
is
designated
as
a
hedging
instrument
and,
if
so,
the
nature
of
the
item
being
hedged.
The
Trust
has
designated
its
interest
rate
swaps
as
a
hedge
of
the
interest
under
the
term
loan
facility.
At
the
inception
of
the
transaction,
the
Trust
documents
the
relationship
between
hedging
instruments
and
hedged
items,
as
well
as
its
risk
management
objectives
and
strategy
for
undertaking
various
hedging
transactions.
The
Trust
also
documents,
both
at
hedge
inception
and
on
an
ongoing
basis,
its
assessment
of
whether
the
derivatives
used
in
hedging
transactions
are
highly
effective
in
offsetting
changes
in
cash
flows
of
hedged
items.
The
effective
portion
of
changes
in
the
fair
value
of
derivatives
that
are
designated
and
qualify
as
cash
flow
hedges
is
recognized
in
other
comprehensive
income.
The
gain
or
loss
relating
to
the
ineffective
portion
is
recognized
immediately
in
the
consolidated
statements
of
comprehensive
income.
Amounts
accumulated
in
equity
are
reclassified
to
other
comprehensive
income
or
loss
in
the
periods
when
the
hedged
item
affects
profit
or
loss.
When
a
hedging
instrument
expires
or
is
sold,
or
when
a
hedge
no
longer
meets
the
criteria
for
hedge
accounting,
any
cumulative
gains
or
losses
existing
in
equity
at
that
time
are
recognized
in
the
consolidated
statements
of
comprehensive
income
immediately.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
91
Interest
on
debt
Interest
on
debt
includes
coupon
interest,
amortization
of
premiums
allocated
to
the
conversion
features
of
the
convertible
debentures,
and
amortization
of
ancillary
costs
incurred
in
connection
with
the
arrangement
of
borrowings.
Finance
costs
are
amortized
to
interest
expense
unless
they
relate
to
a
qualifying
asset
in
which
case
they
are
capitalized.
Equity
The
Trust
presents
REIT
Units
as
equity,
notwithstanding
the
fact
that
the
Trust’s
REIT
Units
meet
the
definition
of
a
financial
liability.
Under
IAS
32,
the
REIT
Units
are
considered
a
puttable
financial
instrument
because
of
the
holder’s
option
to
redeem
REIT
Units,
generally
at
any
time,
subject
to
certain
restrictions,
at
a
redemption
price
per
unit
equal
to
the
lesser
of
90%
of
a
20-‐day
weighted
average
closing
price
prior
to
the
redemption
date
or
100%
of
the
closing
market
price
on
the
redemption
date.
The
total
amount
payable
by
Dream
Office
REIT
in
any
calendar
month
will
not
exceed
$50
unless
waived
by
Dream
Office
REIT’s
Board
of
Trustees
at
their
sole
discretion.
The
Trust
has
determined
the
REIT
Units
can
be
presented
as
equity
and
not
financial
liabilities
because
the
REIT
Units
have
all
of
the
following
features,
as
defined
in
IAS
32
(hereinafter
referred
to
as
the
“puttable
exemption”):
• REIT
Units
entitle
the
holder
to
a
pro
rata
share
of
the
Trust’s
net
assets
in
the
event
of
its
liquidation.
Net
assets
are
those
assets
that
remain
after
deducting
all
other
claims
on
the
assets.
• REIT
Units
are
the
class
of
instruments
that
are
subordinate
to
all
other
classes
of
instruments
because
they
have
no
priority
over
other
claims
to
the
assets
of
the
Trust
on
liquidation,
and
do
not
need
to
be
converted
into
another
instrument
before
they
are
in
the
class
of
instruments
that
is
subordinate
to
all
other
classes
of
instruments.
• All
instruments
in
the
class
of
instruments
that
is
subordinate
to
all
other
classes
of
instruments
have
identical
features.
• Apart
from
the
contractual
obligation
for
the
Trust
to
redeem
the
REIT
Units
for
cash
or
another
financial
asset,
the
REIT
Units
do
not
include
any
contractual
obligation
to
deliver
cash
or
another
financial
asset
to
another
entity,
or
to
exchange
financial
assets
or
financial
liabilities
with
another
entity
under
conditions
that
are
potentially
unfavourable
to
the
Trust,
and
it
is
not
a
contract
that
will
or
may
be
settled
in
the
Trust’s
own
instruments.
•
The
total
expected
cash
flows
attributable
to
the
REIT
Units
over
their
lives
are
based
substantially
on
the
profit
or
loss,
and
the
change
in
the
recognized
net
assets
and
unrecognized
net
assets
of
the
Trust
over
the
life
of
the
REIT
Units.
• REIT
Units
are
initially
recognized
at
the
fair
value
of
the
consideration
received
by
the
Trust.
Any
transaction
costs
arising
on
the
issuance
of
REIT
Units
are
recognized
directly
in
unitholders’
equity
as
a
reduction
of
the
proceeds
received.
Provisions
Provisions
for
legal
claims
are
recognized
when
the
Trust
has
a
present
legal
or
constructive
obligation
as
a
result
of
past
events;
it
is
probable
an
outflow
of
resources
will
be
required
to
settle
the
obligation;
and
the
amount
has
been
reliably
estimated.
Provisions
are
not
recognized
for
future
operating
losses.
Where
there
are
a
number
of
similar
obligations,
the
likelihood
an
outflow
will
be
required
in
settlement
is
determined
by
considering
the
class
of
obligations
as
a
whole.
A
provision
is
recognized
even
if
the
likelihood
of
an
outflow
with
respect
to
any
one
item
included
in
the
same
class
of
obligations
may
be
small.
Provisions
are
measured
at
the
present
value
of
the
expenditures
expected
to
be
required
to
settle
the
obligation
using
a
rate
that
reflects
current
market
assessments
of
the
time
value
of
money
and
the
risks
specific
to
the
obligation.
The
increase
in
the
provision
due
to
passage
of
time
is
recognized
as
interest
expense.
Assets
held
for
sale
Assets
and
liabilities
(or
disposal
groups)
are
classified
as
held
for
sale
when
their
carrying
amount
is
to
be
recovered
principally
through
a
sale
transaction
and
a
sale
is
considered
highly
probable.
Investment
properties
continue
to
be
measured
at
fair
value
and
the
remainder
of
the
disposal
group
is
stated
at
the
lower
of
the
carrying
amount
and
fair
value
less
costs
to
sell.
Foreign
currencies
The
consolidated
financial
statements
are
presented
in
Canadian
dollars,
which
is
the
functional
currency
of
the
Trust
and
the
presentation
currency
for
the
consolidated
financial
statements.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
92
Assets
and
liabilities
related
to
properties
held
in
a
foreign
entity
with
a
functional
currency
other
than
the
Canadian
dollar
are
translated
at
the
rate
of
exchange
at
the
consolidated
balance
sheet
dates.
Revenues
and
expenses
are
translated
at
average
rates
for
the
period,
unless
exchange
rates
fluctuate
significantly
during
the
period
in
which
case
the
exchange
rates
at
the
dates
of
the
transactions
are
used.
The
resulting
foreign
currency
translation
adjustments
are
recognized
in
other
comprehensive
income.
Note
4
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING
JUDGMENTS,
ESTIMATES
AND
ASSUMPTIONS
IN
APPLYING
ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
Preparing
the
consolidated
financial
statements
requires
management
to
make
judgments,
estimates
and
assumptions
that
affect
the
amounts
reported.
Management
bases
its
judgments
and
estimates
on
historical
experience
and
other
factors
it
believes
to
be
reasonable
under
the
circumstances,
but
which
are
inherently
uncertain
and
unpredictable,
the
result
of
which
forms
the
basis
of
the
carrying
amounts
of
assets
and
liabilities.
However,
uncertainty
about
these
assumptions
and
estimates
could
result
in
outcomes
that
could
require
a
material
adjustment
to
the
carrying
amount
of
the
affected
asset
or
liability
in
the
future.
Critical
accounting
judgments
The
following
are
the
critical
accounting
judgments
used
in
applying
the
Trust’s
accounting
policies
that
have
the
most
significant
effect
on
the
amounts
in
the
consolidated
financial
statements:
Investment
properties
Critical
judgments
are
made
in
respect
of
the
fair
values
of
investment
properties
and
the
investment
properties
held
in
equity
accounted
investments.
The
fair
values
of
these
investments
are
reviewed
regularly
by
management
with
reference
to
independent
property
valuations
and
market
conditions
existing
at
the
reporting
date,
using
generally
accepted
market
practices.
The
independent
valuators
are
experienced,
nationally
recognized
and
qualified
in
the
professional
valuation
of
office
buildings
in
their
respective
geographic
areas.
Judgment
is
also
applied
in
determining
the
extent
and
frequency
of
independent
appraisals.
At
each
annual
reporting
period,
a
select
number
of
properties,
determined
on
a
rotational
basis,
will
be
valued
by
qualified
valuation
professionals.
For
properties
not
subject
to
independent
appraisals,
internal
appraisals
are
prepared
by
management
during
each
reporting
period.
The
Trust
makes
judgments
with
respect
to
whether
lease
incentives
provided
in
connection
with
a
lease
enhance
the
value
of
the
leased
space,
which
determines
whether
or
not
such
amounts
are
treated
as
tenant
improvements
and
added
to
investment
properties.
Lease
incentives,
such
as
cash,
rent-‐free
periods
and
lessee-‐
or
lessor-‐owned
improvements,
may
be
provided
to
lessees
to
enter
into
an
operating
lease.
Lease
incentives
that
do
not
provide
benefits
beyond
the
initial
lease
term
are
included
in
the
carrying
amount
of
investment
properties
and
are
amortized
as
a
reduction
of
rental
revenue
on
a
straight-‐
line
basis
over
the
term
of
the
lease.
Judgment
is
also
applied
in
determining
whether
certain
costs
are
additions
to
the
carrying
amount
of
the
investment
property
and,
for
properties
under
development,
identifying
the
point
at
which
practical
completion
of
the
property
occurs
and
identifying
the
directly
attributable
borrowing
costs
to
be
included
in
the
carrying
amount
of
the
development
property.
Business
combinations
Accounting
for
business
combinations
under
IFRS
3,
“Business
Combinations”
(“IFRS
3”),
only
applies
if
it
is
considered
that
a
business
has
been
acquired.
Under
IFRS
3,
a
business
is
defined
as
an
integrated
set
of
activities
and
assets
conducted
and
managed
for
the
purpose
of
providing
a
return
to
investors
or
lower
costs
or
other
economic
benefits
directly
and
proportionately
to
the
Trust.
A
business
generally
consists
of
inputs,
processes
applied
to
those
inputs,
and
resulting
outputs
that
are,
or
will
be,
used
to
generate
revenues.
In
the
absence
of
such
criteria,
a
group
of
assets
is
deemed
to
have
been
acquired.
If
goodwill
is
present
in
a
transferred
set
of
activities
and
assets,
the
transferred
set
is
presumed
to
be
a
business.
Judgment
is
used
by
management
in
determining
whether
the
acquisition
of
an
individual
property
qualifies
as
a
business
combination
in
accordance
with
IFRS
3
or
as
an
asset
acquisition.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
93
When
determining
whether
the
acquisition
of
an
investment
property
or
a
portfolio
of
investment
properties
is
a
business
combination
or
an
asset
acquisition,
the
Trust
applies
judgment
when
considering
the
following:
• whether
the
investment
property
or
properties
are
capable
of
producing
outputs
• whether
the
market
participant
could
produce
outputs
if
missing
elements
exist
In
particular,
the
Trust
considers
the
following:
• whether
employees
were
assumed
in
the
acquisition
• whether
an
operating
platform
has
been
acquired
Currently,
when
the
Trust
acquires
properties
or
a
portfolio
of
properties
and
not
legal
entities,
does
not
take
on
or
assume
employees,
or
does
not
acquire
an
operating
platform,
it
classifies
the
acquisition
as
an
asset
acquisition.
Impairment
The
Trust
assesses
the
possibility
and
amount
of
any
impairment
loss
or
write-‐down
as
it
relates
to
the
Investment
in
Dream
Industrial
REIT,
amounts
receivable,
property
and
equipment,
external
management
contracts,
and
goodwill.
IAS
39,
“Financial
instruments:
Recognition
and
measurement”,
requires
management
to
use
judgment
in
determining
if
the
Trust’s
financial
assets
are
impaired.
In
making
this
judgment,
the
Trust
evaluates,
among
other
factors,
the
duration
and
extent
to
which
the
fair
value
of
the
investment
is
less
than
its
carrying
amount;
and
the
financial
health
of
and
short-‐term
business
outlook
for
the
investee,
including
factors
such
as
industry
and
sector
performance,
changes
in
technology,
and
operational
and
financing
cash
flow.
IAS
36,
“Impairment
of
Assets”
(“IAS
36”),
requires
management
to
use
judgment
in
determining
the
recoverable
amount
of
assets
and
equity
accounted
investments
that
are
tested
for
impairment,
including
goodwill
and
the
investment
in
Dream
Industrial
REIT.
Judgment
is
involved
in
estimating
the
fair
value
less
cost
to
sell
or
value-‐in-‐use
of
the
cash-‐generating
units
(“CGUs”)
to
which
goodwill
has
been
allocated,
including
estimates
of
growth
rates,
discount
rates
and
terminal
rates.
Judgment
is
also
involved
in
estimating
the
value-‐in-‐use
of
the
investment
in
Dream
Industrial
REIT,
including
estimates
of
future
cash
flows,
discount
rates
and
terminal
rates.
The
values
assigned
to
these
key
assumptions
reflect
past
experience
and
are
consistent
with
external
sources
of
information.
The
Trust’s
goodwill
balance
is
allocated
to
the
office
properties
group
of
CGUs
by
geographical
segment
(herein
referred
to
as
the
goodwill
CGU).
The
recoverable
amount
of
the
Trust’s
goodwill
CGU
is
determined
based
on
the
value-‐in-‐use
approach.
For
the
purpose
of
this
impairment
test,
the
Trust
uses
cash
flow
projections
forecasted
out
for
a
ten-‐year
period,
consistent
with
the
internal
financial
budgets
approved
by
management
on
a
property-‐by-‐property
basis.
The
key
assumptions
used
in
determining
the
value-‐in-‐use
of
the
goodwill
CGU
are
the
estimated
growth
rate,
discount
rate
and
terminal
rate.
In
arriving
at
the
growth
rate,
the
Trust
considers
past
experience
and
inflation,
as
well
as
industry
trends.
The
Trust
utilizes
weighted
average
cost
of
capital
(“WACC”)
to
determine
the
discount
rate
and
terminal
rate.
The
WACC
reflects
specific
risks
that
would
be
attributable
to
the
Trust.
As
the
Trust
is
not
subject
to
taxation,
no
adjustment
is
required
to
adjust
the
WACC
on
a
pre-‐tax
basis.
Estimates
and
assumptions
The
Trust
makes
estimates
and
assumptions
that
affect
the
carrying
amounts
of
assets
and
liabilities,
the
disclosure
of
contingent
assets
and
liabilities,
and
the
reported
amount
of
earnings
for
the
period.
Actual
results
could
differ
from
these
estimates.
The
estimates
and
assumptions
that
are
critical
in
determining
the
amounts
reported
in
the
consolidated
financial
statements
relate
to
the
following:
Valuation
of
investment
properties
Critical
assumptions
relating
to
the
estimates
of
fair
values
of
investment
properties
include
the
receipt
of
contractual
rents,
expected
future
market
rents,
renewal
rates,
maintenance
requirements,
discount
rates
that
reflect
current
market
uncertainties,
capitalization
rates,
and
current
and
recent
property
investment
prices.
If
there
is
any
change
in
these
assumptions
or
regional,
national
or
international
economic
conditions,
the
fair
value
of
investment
properties
may
change
materially.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
94
Valuation
of
financial
instruments
The
Trust
makes
estimates
and
assumptions
relating
to
the
fair
value
measurement
of
the
subsidiary
redeemable
units,
the
deferred
trust
units,
the
convertible
debenture
conversion
feature,
interest
rate
swaps
and
the
fair
value
disclosure
of
the
convertible
debentures,
mortgages
and
term
debt.
The
critical
assumptions
underlying
the
fair
value
measurements
and
disclosures
include
the
market
price
of
REIT
Units,
market
interest
rates
for
mortgages,
term
debt
and
unsecured
debentures,
and
assessment
of
the
effectiveness
of
hedging
relationships.
For
certain
financial
instruments,
including
cash
and
cash
equivalents,
promissory
notes
receivable,
amounts
receivable,
amounts
payable
and
accrued
liabilities,
deposits
and
distributions
payable,
the
carrying
amounts
approximate
fair
values
due
to
their
immediate
or
short-‐term
maturity.
The
fair
values
of
mortgages,
term
debt
and
interest
rate
swaps
are
determined
based
on
discounted
cash
flows
using
discount
rates
that
reflect
current
market
conditions
for
instruments
with
similar
terms
and
risks.
The
fair
value
of
convertible
debentures
is
determined
by
reference
to
quoted
market
prices
from
an
active
market.
Note
5
CHANGES
IN
ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
AND
DISCLOSURES
The
Trust
has
adopted
the
following
new
and
revised
standards,
along
with
any
consequential
amendments,
effective
January
1,
2014.
These
changes
were
made
in
accordance
with
the
applicable
transitional
provisions.
Consolidated
financial
statements
Amendments
to
IFRS
10,
“Consolidated
Financial
Statements”,
IFRS
12,
“Disclosure
of
Interests
in
Other
Entities”
(“IFRS
12”)
and
IAS
27,
“Separate
financial
statements
–
Investment
entities”
(“IAS
27”):
The
amendments
define
an
investment
entity
and
introduce
an
exception
to
consolidating
particular
subsidiaries
for
investment
entities.
These
investments
require
an
investment
entity
to
measure
those
subsidiaries
at
fair
value
through
profit
or
loss,
in
accordance
with
IFRS
9,
“Financial
Instruments”,
in
its
consolidated
and
separate
financial
statements.
The
amendments
also
introduce
new
disclosure
requirements
for
investment
entities
in
IFRS
12
and
IAS
27.
The
Trust
is
not
considered
to
be
an
investment
entity
and
thus,
the
Trust
adopted
these
amendments
without
impact
to
the
consolidated
financial
statements
or
note
disclosures
effective
January
1,
2014.
Segment
reporting
A
reportable
operating
segment
is
a
distinguishable
component
of
the
Trust
that
is
engaged
either
in
providing
related
rental
space
or
services
(business
segment)
or
in
providing
rental
space
or
services
within
a
particular
economic
environment
(geographical
segment),
which
is
subject
to
risks
and
rewards
that
are
different
from
those
of
other
reportable
segments.
The
Trust’s
reportable
operating
segments
include
Western
Canada,
Calgary
downtown,
Calgary
suburban,
Toronto
downtown,
Toronto
suburban,
and
Eastern
Canada,
which
are
based
on
internal
reporting
structure
to
management.
Operating
segments
are
reported
in
a
manner
consistent
with
the
internal
reporting
provided
to
the
chief
operating
decision-‐maker,
determined
to
be
the
Chief
Executive
Officer
(“CEO”)
of
the
Trust.
Prior
to
January
1,
2014,
the
Trust
analyzed
its
operations
as
a
single
office
portfolio.
Beginning
January
1,
2014,
the
CEO
analyzed
the
portfolio
based
on
the
aforementioned
geographical
segments.
The
comparative
amounts
have
been
reclassified
to
conform
to
the
current
year’s
presentation.
Accounting
for
levies
imposed
by
governments
IFRIC
21,
“Levies”
(“IFRIC
21”),
provides
guidance
on
accounting
for
levies
in
accordance
with
IAS
37,
“Provisions,
Contingent
Liabilities
and
Contingent
Assets”.
The
interpretation
defines
a
levy
as
an
outflow
from
an
entity
imposed
by
a
government
in
accordance
with
legislation
and
confirms
that
an
entity
recognizes
a
liability
for
a
levy
only
when
the
triggering
event
specified
in
the
legislation
occurs.
The
Trust
adopted
this
new
interpretation
effective
January
1,
2014
and
it
was
applied
retrospectively.
This
new
interpretation
had
no
material
impact
on
the
amounts
recognized
in
the
Trust’s
consolidated
financial
statements
or
note
disclosures
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
95
Accounting
for
internal
leasing
costs
Prior
to
January
1,
2014,
the
Trust
capitalized
costs
of
certain
internal
leasing
costs
within
initial
direct
leasing
costs
to
investment
properties.
These
costs
would
not
have
been
incurred
if
no
leasing
activity
had
taken
place
and
are
reasonably
and
directly
attributable
to
the
leasing
activity.
On
April
2,
2014,
IFRIC
issued
an
agenda
decision
indicating
that
certain
internal
leasing
costs
such
as
salary
costs
of
permanent
staff
involved
in
negotiating
and
arranging
new
leases
do
not
qualify
as
incremental
costs
in
accordance
with
IAS
17,
“Leases”.
As
a
result,
the
Trust
has
adopted
an
accounting
policy
effective
January
1,
2014
of
recognizing
certain
internal
leasing
costs
involved
in
negotiating
and
arranging
new
leases
in
the
consolidated
statements
of
comprehensive
income
as
incurred.
This
accounting
policy
has
been
applied
retrospectively.
The
impact
for
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013
is
an
increase
to
internal
leasing
costs
expense
included
as
part
of
net
gains
(losses)
on
transactions
and
other
activities
of
$6,118
and
$6,468,
respectively,
and
a
corresponding
increase
in
fair
value
adjustments
to
investment
properties
of
$6,118
and
$6,468,
respectively.
This
change
did
not
impact
the
consolidated
balance
sheets.
External
direct
leasing
costs
continue
to
be
capitalized
to
initial
direct
leasing
costs
within
investment
properties.
Note
6
FUTURE
ACCOUNTING
POLICY
CHANGES
Revenue
recognition
IFRS
15,
“Revenue
from
Contracts
with
Customers”
(“IFRS
15”),
provides
a
comprehensive
five-‐step
revenue
recognition
model
for
all
contracts
with
customers.
The
IFRS
15
revenue
recognition
model
requires
management
to
exercise
significant
judgment
and
make
estimates
that
affect
revenue
recognition.
IFRS
15
is
effective
for
annual
periods
beginning
on
or
after
January
1,
2017,
with
earlier
application
permitted.
The
Trust
is
currently
evaluating
the
impact
of
adopting
this
standard
on
the
consolidated
financial
statements.
Financial
instruments
The
final
version
of
IFRS
9,
“Financial
Instruments”
(“IFRS
9”),
was
issued
by
the
IASB
in
July
2014
and
will
replace
IAS
39,
“Financial
Instruments:
Recognition
and
Measurement”.
IFRS
9
introduces
a
model
for
classification
and
measurement,
a
single,
forward-‐looking
“expected
loss”
impairment
model,
and
a
substantially
reformed
approach
to
hedge
accounting.
The
new
single,
principle-‐based
approach
for
determining
the
classification
of
financial
assets
is
driven
by
cash
flow
characteristics
and
the
business
model
in
which
an
asset
is
held.
The
new
model
also
results
in
a
single
impairment
model
being
applied
to
all
financial
instruments,
which
will
require
more
timely
recognition
of
expected
credit
losses.
It
also
includes
changes
in
respect
of
own
credit
risk
in
measuring
liabilities
elected
to
be
measured
at
fair
value,
so
that
gains
caused
by
the
deterioration
of
an
entity’s
own
credit
risk
on
such
liabilities
are
no
longer
recognized
in
profit
or
loss.
IFRS
9
is
effective
for
annual
periods
beginning
on
or
after
January
1,
2018;
however,
it
is
available
for
early
adoption.
In
addition,
the
own
credit
changes
can
be
early
adopted
in
isolation
without
otherwise
changing
the
accounting
for
financial
instruments.
The
Trust
is
currently
evaluating
the
impact
of
adopting
this
standard
on
the
consolidated
financial
statements.
Presentation
of
financial
statements
IAS
1,
“Presentation
of
Financial
Statements”
(“IAS
1”),
was
amended
by
the
IASB
to
clarify
guidance
on
materiality
and
aggregation,
the
presentation
of
subtotals,
the
structure
of
financial
statements
and
disclosure
of
accounting
policies.
The
amendment
gives
guidance
that
information
within
the
consolidated
balance
sheets
and
statements
of
comprehensive
income
should
not
be
aggregated
or
disaggregated
in
a
manner
that
obscures
useful
information,
and
that
disaggregation
may
be
required
in
the
statement
of
comprehensive
income
in
the
form
of
additional
subtotals
as
they
are
relevant
to
understanding
the
entity’s
financial
position
or
performance.
The
amendments
to
IAS
1
are
effective
for
periods
beginning
on
or
after
January
1,
2016.
The
Trust
is
currently
evaluating
the
impact
of
adopting
this
standard
on
the
consolidated
financial
statements.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
96
Equity
accounting
for
investments
in
associates
and
joint
ventures
IAS
28,
“Investments
in
Associates
and
Joint
Ventures”
(“IAS
28”),
was
amended
by
the
IASB
to
allow
an
entity
which
is
not
an
investment
entity,
but
has
interest
in
an
associate
or
joint
venture
which
is
an
investment
entity,
a
policy
choice
when
applying
the
equity
method
of
accounting.
The
entity
may
choose
to
retain
the
fair
value
measurement
applied
by
the
investment
entity
associate
or
joint
venture,
or
to
unwind
the
fair
value
measurement
and
instead
perform
a
consolidation
at
the
level
of
the
investment
entity
associate
or
joint
venture.
The
amendments
to
IAS
28
are
effective
for
periods
beginning
on
or
after
January
1,
2016.
The
Trust
is
currently
evaluating
the
impact
of
adopting
this
standard
on
the
consolidated
financial
statements.
Note
7
PROPERTY
ACQUISITIONS
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
there
were
no
acquisitions
completed.
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013,
the
following
acquisitions
were
completed:
Property
Broadmoor
Plaza,
Edmonton
887
Great
Northern
Way,
Vancouver
(Discovery
Parks)
340–350
3rd
Avenue
North,
Saskatoon
(T&T
Towers)
and
14505–14555
Bannister
Road,
Calgary
(Parke
at
Fish
Creek)
20
Toronto
Street
and
137
Yonge
Street,
Toronto
212
King
Street
West,
Toronto
IBM
Corporate
Park,
Calgary
4561
Parliament
Avenue,
Regina
(Harbour
Landing
Business
Park)
83
Yonge
Street,
Toronto
Total
(1)
Includes
transaction
costs.
Interest
acquired
Property
type
office
(%)
100.0
$
Purchase
price(1)
84,892
$
Fair
value
of
mortgage
assumed
-‐
Date
acquired
March
15,
2013
Year
ended
December
31,
2013
office
100.0
68,068
31,405
April
8,
2013
office
100.0
62,610
145,983
38,730
124,377
office
office
office
office
office
100.0
100.0
66.7
100.0
100.0
$
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
April
12,
2013
April
30,
2013
May
24,
2013
August
13,
2013
15,517
8,481
548,658
$
-‐
-‐
31,405
September
16,
2013
December
2,
2013
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
97
Note
8
INVESTMENT
PROPERTIES
Balance
at
beginning
of
year
Additions:
Property
acquisitions
Transfer
of
interest
from
investment
in
joint
ventures(1)
Building
improvements
Lease
incentives
and
initial
direct
leasing
costs
Total
additions
to
investment
properties
Dispositions:
Investment
properties
disposed
of
during
the
year
Total
dispositions
of
investment
properties
Gains
and
losses
included
in
net
income:
Fair
value
adjustments
to
investment
properties
Amortization
of
lease
incentives
Total
gains
(losses)
included
in
net
income
Gains
and
losses
included
in
other
comprehensive
income:
Foreign
currency
translation
gain
and
other
Note
$
7
26
Year
ended
December
31,
2013
5,477,560
2014
6,241,685
$
-‐
-‐
29,979
47,414
77,393
(53,947)
(53,947)
(124,303)
(9,893)
(134,196)
548,658
61,823
31,023
37,442
678,946
-‐
-‐
85,745
(6,471)
79,274
8,135
8,135
6,139,070
5,905
5,905
6,241,685
Total
gains
included
in
other
comprehensive
income
Balance
at
end
of
year
Change
in
unrealized
gains
(losses)
included
in
net
income
for
the
year
Change
in
fair
value
of
investment
properties
(1)
On
August
13,
2013,
the
Trust
acquired
the
remaining
66.7%
interest
in
IBM
Corporate
Park
in
Calgary.
Prior
to
August
13,
2013,
the
Trust
held
a
33.3%
(123,064)
85,745
$
$
$
$
interest
in
the
property
through
a
partnership
interest
and
accounted
for
it
as
a
joint
venture.
Investment
properties
have
been
reduced
by
$33,382
(December
31,
2013
–
$29,661)
related
to
straight-‐line
rent
receivables,
which
have
been
reclassified
to
other
non-‐current
assets
(see
Note
11).
Refer
to
Note
31
for
disclosures
surrounding
fair
value
measurements
over
investment
properties.
The
key
valuation
metrics
for
investment
properties,
including
properties
in
joint
ventures,
and
excluding
assets
related
to
assets
held
for
sale,
are
set
out
below:
Capitalization
rate
(“cap
rate”)
(%)
Investment
properties
Investment
in
joint
ventures
Total
portfolio
December
31,
2014
Weighted
December
31,
2013
Weighted
Range
5.15–9.00
5.15–6.00
5.15–9.00
average
6.32
5.29
6.17
Range
5.25–9.00
5.15–6.00
5.15–9.00
average
6.34
5.29
6.19
Generally,
an
increase
in
stabilized
net
operating
income
(“NOI”)
will
result
in
an
increase
to
the
fair
value
of
an
investment
property.
An
increase
in
the
capitalization
rate
(“cap
rate”)
will
result
in
a
decrease
to
the
fair
value
of
an
investment
property.
The
cap
rate
magnifies
the
effect
of
a
change
in
stabilized
NOI,
with
a
lower
rate
resulting
in
a
greater
impact
to
the
fair
value
of
an
investment
property
than
a
higher
rate.
If
the
weighted
average
cap
rate
were
to
increase
by
25
basis
points
(“bps”),
the
value
of
investment
properties
(excluding
joint
ventures
and
assets
held
for
sale)
would
decrease
by
$241,762.
If
the
cap
rate
were
to
decrease
by
25
bps,
the
value
of
investment
properties
(excluding
joint
ventures
and
assets
held
for
sale)
would
increase
by
$262,059.
Investment
properties,
including
investment
in
joint
ventures
and
excluding
assets
held
for
sale,
with
an
aggregate
fair
value
of
$2,475,687
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
(for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013
–
$2,045,384),
were
valued
by
qualified
external
valuation
professionals.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
98
Investment
properties,
including
investment
in
joint
ventures
and
excluding
assets
held
for
sale,
with
a
fair
value
of
$5,768,109
as
at
December
31,
2014
(December
31,
2013
–
$5,939,978),
are
pledged
as
security
for
the
associated
mortgages.
Investment
properties,
including
investment
in
joint
ventures
and
excluding
assets
held
for
sale,
pledged
as
security
for
demand
revolving
credit
facilities
and
term
loan
facility,
are
as
follows:
Number
of
properties
Fair
value
December
31,
December
31,
December
31,
December
31,
Ranking
2014
2013
2014
2013
Facilities
Demand
revolving
credit
facilities:
Formula-‐based
maximum
not
to
exceed
$171,500
Formula-‐based
maximum
not
to
exceed
$27,690
Formula-‐based
maximum
not
to
first
ranking
first
ranking
exceed
$35,000
second
ranking
Formula-‐based
maximum
not
to
exceed
$35,000
Term
loan
facility
Total
first
ranking
second
ranking
first
ranking
9
2
2
1
1
8
23
9
$
256,258
$
259,158
2
2
1
1
8
23
41,993
42,700
167,688
212,209
38,326
117,345
307,097
928,707
$
36,400
114,100
308,050
972,617
$
Note
9
INVESTMENT
IN
DREAM
INDUSTRIAL
REIT
Dream
Industrial
REIT,
formerly
known
as
Dundee
Industrial
REIT,
is
an
unincorporated,
open-‐ended
real
estate
investment
trust
listed
on
the
Toronto
Stock
Exchange
under
the
symbol
“DIR.UN.”.
Dream
Industrial
REIT
owns
a
portfolio
of
216
primarily
light
industrial
properties
comprising
approximately
17
million
square
feet
of
gross
leasable
area.
On
September
9,
2014,
the
Trust
completed
the
sale
of
four
investment
properties
to
Dream
Industrial
REIT
for
a
sale
price
of
$33,000,
net
of
mark-‐to-‐market
adjustments
on
mortgages
assumed
by
Dream
Industrial
REIT.
The
sale
price
was
satisfied
by
receipt
of
2,269,759
Class
B
limited
partnership
units
of
Dream
Industrial
LP
(a
subsidiary
of
Dream
Industrial
REIT)
at
$9.40
per
unit,
which
are
exchangeable
for
units
of
Dream
Industrial
REIT,
offset
by
mortgages
assumed
on
disposition.
As
part
of
other
transactions
entered
into
by
Dream
Industrial
REIT
during
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013,
Dream
Industrial
REIT
issued
additional
units
as
partial
consideration,
which
resulted
in
a
net
change
to
the
Trust’s
ownership
to
24.2%
and
22.9%,
respectively.
Balance
as
at
beginning
of
year
Units
received
on
sale
of
properties
to
Dream
Industrial
REIT
Units
purchased
through
Distribution
Reinvestment
Plan
Distributions
received
Share
of
net
income
from
investment
in
Dream
Industrial
REIT
Dilution
gain
(loss)
Balance
as
at
end
of
year
Dream
Industrial
LP
Class
B
limited
partnership
units
held,
end
of
year
Ownership
%,
end
of
year
$
$
Year
ended
December
31,
2014
166,317
21,336
-‐
(11,927)
16,225
(260)
191,691
18,551,855
24.2%
$
$
2013
160,976
-‐
939
(11,295)
13,720
1,977
166,317
16,282,096
22.9%
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
99
At
December
31,
2014,
the
fair
value
of
the
Trust’s
interest
in
Dream
Industrial
REIT
was
$156,206
(December
31,
2013
–
$144,096).
External
market
conditions
have
caused
a
decline
in
the
unit
price
of
Dream
Industrial
REIT
since
the
second
quarter
of
2013,
resulting
in
the
carrying
value
to
be
above
the
market
value.
Under
IAS
39,
“Financial
Instruments”,
a
significant
or
prolonged
decline
in
the
fair
value
of
an
investment
in
an
equity
instrument
above
its
cost
is
an
indicator
of
impairment.
As
a
result,
the
Trust
performed
an
impairment
test
as
at
December
31,
2014,
by
comparing
the
recoverable
amount
of
its
investment
in
Dream
Industrial
REIT
using
the
value-‐in-‐use
approach
to
its
carrying
value.
Based
on
the
impairment
test
performed,
the
Trust
concluded
that
no
impairment
existed
as
at
December
31,
2014.
The
following
amounts
represent
the
Trust’s
ownership
interest
in
the
assets,
liabilities,
revenues,
expenses
and
cash
flows
of
Dream
Industrial
REIT:
At
100%
At
%
ownership
interest
Non-‐current
assets
Current
assets
Total
assets
Non-‐current
liabilities
Current
liabilities
Total
liabilities
Net
assets
Add-‐back:
Subsidiary
redeemable
units
Investment
in
Dream
Industrial
REIT
Net
rental
income
Other
revenue
and
expenses,
fair
value
adjustments
and
other
items
Net
income
before
the
undernoted
adjustments
Add-‐back:
Interest
on
subsidiary
redeemable
units
Fair
value
adjustments
to
subsidiary
redeemable
units
Share
of
net
income
from
investment
in
Dream
Industrial
REIT
Add
(deduct):
Dilution
gain
(loss)
Share
of
net
income
and
dilution
gain
(loss)
from
investment
in
Dream
Industrial
REIT
2014
1,723,693
19,017
1,742,710
947,970
166,089
1,114,059
628,651
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
December
31,
2013
1,581,282
8,523
1,589,805
883,795
135,194
1,018,989
570,816
At
100
%
Year
ended
December
31,
2013
2014
98,927
112,764
$
(44,763)
68,001 $
(14,946)
83,981
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2014
399,025
4,402
403,427
339,496
28,446
367,942
35,485
156,206
191,691
$
$
$
$
$
December
31,
2013
367,869
1,982
369,851
316,179
31,451
347,630
22,221
144,096
166,317
At
%
ownership
interest
Year
ended
December
31,
2013
2014
23,809
26,104
$
(11,967)
14,137
$
16,884
40,693
11,927
(9,839)
16,225
$
11,295
(38,268)
13,720
(260)
1,977
$
15,965
$
15,697
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
100
Note
10
JOINT
ARRANGEMENTS
The
Trust
participates
in
partnerships
(“joint
ventures”)
with
other
parties
that
own
investment
properties
and
accounts
for
its
interests
using
the
equity
method.
On
August
13,
2013,
the
Trust
acquired
the
remaining
two-‐thirds
interest
in
IBM
Corporate
Park
in
Calgary
for
approximately
$124,377
(including
transaction
costs).
Prior
to
August
13,
2013,
the
Trust
held
a
one-‐third
interest
in
the
property
through
a
partnership
interest
and
accounted
for
it
as
a
joint
venture.
On
June
26,
2013,
the
Trust
acquired
a
two-‐thirds
interest
in
100
Yonge
Street,
an
office
building
in
downtown
Toronto,
for
approximately
$56,273
(including
transaction
costs).
The
Trust
has
entered
into
a
joint
venture
with
H&R
REIT,
the
owner
of
the
remaining
one-‐third
interest
in
this
office
building.
The
acquisition
was
funded
by
the
assumption
of
a
mortgage
of
$25,477
(at
fair
value)
with
the
balance
funded
by
cash.
The
investment
properties
that
the
joint
ventures
hold
are
consistent
in
terms
of
the
class
and
type
of
properties
held
in
the
Trust’s
portfolio.
Property
Scotia
Plaza
Other
joint
ventures:
100
Yonge
Street
Telus
Tower
Property
Scotia
Plaza
Other
joint
ventures
Total
net
assets
Location
Toronto,
Ontario
Toronto,
Ontario
Calgary,
Alberta
December
31,
2014
66.7
Ownership
interest
(%)
December
31,
2013
66.7
66.7
50.0
66.7
50.0
Net
assets
at
%
ownership
interest
as
at
December
31,
2013
430,681
96,574
527,255
2014
448,906
104,235
553,141
$
$
$
$
Share
of
net
income
(loss)
at
%
ownership
interest
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013
Property
57,441
Scotia
Plaza
Other
joint
ventures(1)
26,941
Share
of
net
income
from
investment
in
joint
ventures
84,382
(1)
Other
joint
ventures
consist
of
the
share
of
net
income
(loss)
from
Capital
Centre,
Plaza
124,
Riverbend
Atrium
and
Stockman
Centre,
which
were
reclassified
2014
31,345
6,266
37,611
$
$
$
$
as
assets
held
for
sale
as
at
December
31,
2013.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
101
The
following
amounts
represent
100%
and
the
Trust’s
ownership
interest
in
the
assets,
liabilities,
revenues,
expenses
and
cash
flows
in
the
equity
accounted
investments
in
which
the
Trust
participates,
excluding
the
interest
in
Dream
Industrial
REIT,
which
is
disclosed
separately
in
Note
9.
Scotia
Plaza
At
100%
Scotia
Plaza
At
66.7%
December
31,
December
31,
Non-‐current
assets
Current
assets
Total
assets
Non-‐current
liabilities
Current
liabilities
Total
liabilities
Net
assets
2014
1,316,805
14,150
1,330,955
599,255
58,341
657,596
673,359
$
$
$
$
2013
1,308,542
5,306
1,313,848
612,603
55,221
667,824
646,024
$
$
$
$
Net
rental
income
Other
income
and
expenses,
fair
value
adjustments,
net
gains
(losses)
on
transactions
and
other
activities
Net
income
for
the
year
$
$
Scotia
Plaza
At
100%
Year
ended
December
31,
2013
2014
70,211
70,404
$
(23,387)
47,017
$
15,950
86,161
2014
877,870
9,433
887,303
399,503
38,894
438,397
448,906
$
$
$
$
2013
872,360
3,537
875,897
408,402
36,814
445,216
430,681
Scotia
Plaza
At
66.7%
Year
ended
December
31,
2014
46,936
(15,591)
31,345
$
$
2013
46,807
10,634
57,441
$
$
$
$
$
$
Scotia
Plaza
At
100%
Year
ended
December
31,
2013
2014
Scotia
Plaza
At
66.7%
Year
ended
December
31,
2014
2013
Cash
flow
generated
from
(utilized
in):
Operating
activities
Investing
activities
Financing
activities
Increase
(decrease)
in
cash
and
cash
equivalents
$
$
43,976
(710)
(33,468)
9,798
$
$
44,502
(1,310)
(44,834)
(1,642)
$
$
29,317
(473)
(22,312)
6,532
$
$
29,668
(873)
(29,890)
(1,095)
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
102
Non-‐current
assets
Current
assets
Total
assets
Non-‐current
liabilities
Current
liabilities
Total
liabilities
Net
assets
Other
joint
ventures
At
100%
Other
joint
ventures
At
proportionate
share
2014
360,801
2,879
363,680
160,704
9,139
169,843
193,837
$
$
$
$
December
31,
2013
357,823
4,576
362,399
165,305
18,188
183,493
178,906
$
$
$
$
2014
193,413
1,569
194,982
85,780
4,967
90,747
104,235
$
$
$
$
December
31,
2013
191,880
2,319
194,199
88,243
9,382
97,625
96,574
$
$
$
$
Other
joint
ventures(1)
At
100%
Other
joint
ventures(1)
At
proportionate
share
Net
rental
income
Other
income
and
expenses,
fair
value
adjustments,
net
12,356
gains
(losses)
on
transactions
and
other
activities
Net
income
(loss)
for
the
year
26,941
(1)
Other
joint
ventures
consist
of
the
share
of
net
income
(loss)
from
Capital
Centre,
Plaza
124,
Riverbend
Atrium
and
Stockman
Centre,
which
were
reclassified
(16,879)
9,815
(7,240)
6,266
35,812
69,553
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Year
ended
December
31,
2014
26,694
2013
33,741
Year
ended
December
31,
2014
2013
14,585
13,506
as
assets
held
for
sale
as
at
December
31,
2013.
Cash
flow
generated
from
(utilized
in):
Operating
activities
Investing
activities
Financing
activities
$
Other
joint
ventures(1)
At
100%
Year
ended
December
31,
2013
2014
Other
joint
ventures(1)
At
proportionate
share
Year
ended
December
31,
2013
2014
$
13,373
64,504
(80,419)
(2,542)
$
17,887
(9,077)
(14,127)
(5,317)
$
8,279
14,442
(22,996)
(275)
9,193
(4,268)
(6,962)
(2,037)
Decrease
in
cash
and
cash
equivalents
$
(1)
Other
joint
ventures
consist
of
the
share
of
cash
flows
generated
from
Capital
Centre,
Plaza
124,
Riverbend
Atrium
and
Stockman
Centre,
which
were
$
$
$
reclassified
as
assets
held
for
sale
as
at
December
31,
2013.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
103
Co-‐owned
investment
properties
The
Trust’s
interests
in
co-‐owned
investment
properties
are
accounted
for
based
on
the
Trust’s
share
of
interest
in
the
assets,
liabilities,
revenues
and
expenses
of
the
properties.
Property
10199
-‐
101st
Street
North
West
St.
Albert
Trail
Centre
2810
Matheson
Boulevard
East
50
&
90
Burnhamthorpe
Road
(Sussex
Centre)
300,
302
&
304
The
East
Mall
(Valhalla
Executive
Centre)
680
Broadway
Street
(Tillsonburg
Gateway
Centre)
185–195
The
West
Mall
460
Two
Nations
Crossing
350–450
Lansdowne
Street
275
Dundas
Street
West
(London
City
Centre)
80
Whitehall
Drive
6501–6523
Mississauga
Road
6531–6559
Mississauga
Road
2010
Winston
Park
Drive
219
Laurier
Avenue
West
55
Norfolk
Street
South
10
Lower
Spadina
Avenue
49
Ontario
Street
401
&
405
The
West
Mall
(Commerce
West)
2261
Keating
Cross
Road
117
Kearney
Lake
Road
Centre
70
Location
Edmonton,
Alberta
Edmonton,
Alberta
Mississauga,
Ontario
Mississauga,
Ontario
Mississauga,
Ontario
Tillsonburg,
Ontario
Toronto,
Ontario
Fredericton,
New
Brunswick
Kamloops,
British
Columbia
London,
Ontario
Markham,
Ontario
Mississauga,
Ontario
Mississauga,
Ontario
Oakville,
Ontario
Ottawa,
Ontario
Simcoe,
Ontario
Toronto,
Ontario
Toronto,
Ontario
Toronto,
Ontario
Victoria,
British
Columbia
Halifax,
Nova
Scotia
Calgary,
Alberta
Ownership
interest
(%)
December
31,
December
31,
2014
50.0
-‐
49.9
49.9
49.9
49.9
49.9
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.0
35.0
15.0
2013
50.0
50.0
49.9
49.9
49.9
49.9
49.9
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.0
35.0
15.0
The
following
amounts
represent
the
Trust’s
ownership
interest
in
the
assets,
liabilities,
revenues
and
expenses
of
the
co-‐owned
properties
in
which
the
Trust
participates.
Non-‐current
assets
Current
assets
Total
assets
Non-‐current
liabilities
Current
liabilities
Total
liabilities
Net
assets
Net
rental
income
Other
income
and
expenses,
fair
value
adjustments,
net
gains
(losses)
on
transactions
and
other
activities
Share
of
net
income
from
investment
in
co-‐owned
properties
December
31,
December
31,
2014
445,314
8,315
453,629
160,553
68,445
228,998
224,631
$
$
$
$
$
2013
452,624
9,955
462,579
214,787
26,162
240,949
221,630
Year
ended
December
31,
2014
24,753
(12,652)
12,101
$
$
2013
27,226
(18,823)
8,403
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
104
Note
11
OTHER
NON-‐CURRENT
ASSETS
Property
and
equipment,
net
of
accumulated
depreciation
of
$4,813
(December
31,
2013
–
$3,135)
Deposits
Restricted
cash
Straight-‐line
rent
receivable
External
management
contracts,
net
of
accumulated
amortization
of
$3,749
(December
31,
2013
–
$2,457)
Goodwill
Total
December
31,
December
31,
$
2014
6,398
2,125
3,559
33,382
2013
6,709
2,919
2,617
29,661
9,253
52,086
106,803
$
10,545
52,371
104,822
$
$
Deposits
largely
represent
amounts
provided
by
the
Trust
in
connection
with
utility
deposits.
Restricted
cash
primarily
represents
tenant
rent
deposits
and
cash
held
as
security
for
certain
mortgages.
The
Trust
leases
various
vehicles
and
machinery
under
non-‐cancellable
finance
lease
agreements.
The
remaining
term
of
these
leases
is
for
two
years.
External
management
contracts
and
goodwill
As
at
January
1,
2013
Amortization
of
external
management
contracts
As
at
December
31,
2013
Amortization
of
external
management
contracts
Derecognition
of
goodwill
due
to
investment
properties
disposed
of
during
the
year
As
at
December
31,
2014
External
management
contracts
11,883
(1,338)
10,545
(1,292)
-‐
9,253
$
$
$
$
Goodwill
52,371
-‐
52,371
-‐
(285)
52,086
The
Trust
performed
its
annual
goodwill
impairment
test
as
at
December
31,
2014
in
accordance
with
the
methodology
set
out
in
IAS
36,
by
comparing
the
recoverable
amount
of
the
goodwill
CGU
using
the
value-‐in-‐use
approach
to
its
carrying
amount.
The
carrying
amount
of
goodwill
associated
with
each
geographical
segment
was:
Western
Canada
Calgary
downtown
Calgary
suburban
Toronto
downtown
Toronto
suburban
Eastern
Canada
Total
goodwill
$
$
10,155
8,360
1,331
17,460
6,980
7,800
52,086
For
the
purpose
of
this
impairment
test,
management
has
used
its
projected
financial
forecasts
for
a
period
of
ten
years.
The
key
assumptions
used
included
estimated
growth
rate
and
discount
and
terminal
rates.
The
discount
and
terminal
rates
used
in
this
impairment
test
ranged
from
4.92%
to
6.31%
depending
on
the
geographical
region.
The
Trust
performed
a
sensitivity
analysis
on
each
of
the
key
assumptions,
assuming
a
100
bps
unfavourable
change
for
each
of
the
individual
assumptions
while
holding
other
assumptions
constant,
and
determined
that
there
will
be
no
material
impairment.
Based
on
the
impairment
test
performed,
the
Trust
concluded
that
no
goodwill
impairment
existed
as
at
December
31,
2014.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
105
Note
12
AMOUNTS
RECEIVABLE
Amounts
receivable
are
net
of
credit
adjustments
aggregating
$5,992
(December
31,
2013
–
$11,450).
Trade
receivables
Less:
Provision
for
impairment
of
trade
receivables
Trade
receivables,
net
Other
amounts
receivable
Total
December
31,
December
31,
Note
25
$
$
2014
8,296
(2,419)
5,877
10,688
16,565
$
$
2013
9,671
(2,113)
7,558
20,918
28,476
The
movement
in
the
provision
for
impairment
of
trade
receivables
during
the
year
ended
December
31
was
as
follows:
Balance
at
beginning
of
year
Provision
for
impairment
of
trade
receivables
Reversal
of
provision
for
previously
impaired
trade
receivables
Receivables
written
off
during
the
period
as
uncollectible
Balance
at
end
of
year
Year
ended
December
31,
2014
2,113
1,812
(589)
(917)
2,419
$
$
2013
1,993
1,044
(231)
(693)
2,113
$
$
The
carrying
value
of
amounts
receivable
approximates
fair
value
due
to
their
current
nature.
As
at
December
31,
2014,
trade
receivables
of
approximately
$2,642
(December
31,
2013
–
$3,205)
were
past
due
but
not
considered
impaired
as
the
Trust
has
ongoing
relationships
with
these
tenants
and
the
aging
of
these
trade
receivables
is
not
indicative
of
expected
default.
The
Trust
leases
office
properties
to
tenants
under
operating
leases.
Minimum
rental
commitments,
including
joint
operations,
on
non-‐cancellable
tenant
operating
leases
over
their
remaining
terms
are
as
follows:
No
more
than
1
year
1–5
years
5+
years
December
31,
2014
332,653
$
855,490
322,237
1,510,380
$
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
106
Note
13
DEBT
Mortgages(1)(2)
Term
debt
Demand
revolving
credit
facilities(2)
Term
loan
facility(2)
Convertible
debentures
Debentures
Total
Less:
Current
portion
Non-‐current
debt
(1)
Net
of
financing
costs
of
$7,943
(December
31,
2013
–
$8,079).
(2)
Secured
by
charges
on
specific
investment
properties
(refer
to
Note
8).
Demand
revolving
credit
facilities
December
31,
December
31,
2014
2,380,708
533
-‐
182,260
51,160
482,700
3,097,361
365,855
2,731,506
$
$
2013
2,477,183
825
103,946
181,530
51,885
333,647
3,149,016
264,535
2,884,481
$
$
Secured
investment
properties
Second-‐
First-‐
Face
December
31,
2014
December
31,
2013
ranking
ranking
interest
Amount
Maturity
date
mortgages
mortgages
rate
available
Amount
drawn
Amount
available
Amount
drawn
Formula-‐based
maximum
not
to
exceed
$171,500
Formula-‐based
maximum
not
to
exceed
$27,690
Formula-‐based
maximum
not
to
exceed
$35,000
Formula-‐based
maximum
March
5,
2016
April
30,
2015
April
30,
2015
not
to
exceed
$35,000
April
30,
2015
9
2
-‐
1
12
-‐
-‐
3.75%(1)
$
171,500
$
-‐
$
67,500
$
104,000
3.85%(2)
27,247(3)
2
3.75%(1)
34,850(4)
1
3.75%(1)
3
3.76%
17,943(5)
$
251,540
$
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
26,156(3)
32,819(4)
-‐
-‐
34,700(5)
161,175
$
-‐
104,000
$
(1) In
the
form
of
rolling
one-‐month
bankersʼ
acceptances
(“BAs”)
bearing
interest
at
the
BA
rate
plus
1.75%
or
at
the
bankʼs
prime
rate
(3.0%
as
at
December
31,
2014)
plus
0.75%.
(2) This
facility
matured
on
April
30,
2014
and
was
extended
to
April
30,
2015
in
the
form
of
rolling
one-‐month
BAs
bearing
interest
at
BA
rate
plus
1.85%
or
at
the
bankʼs
prime
rate
plus
0.85%.
(3) Formula-‐based
amount
available
under
this
facility
was
$27,690
less
$443
in
the
form
of
a
letter
of
credit
(“LOC”)
as
at
December
31,
2014
and
$27,690
less
$1,534
(LOC)
as
at
December
31,
2013.
(4) Formula-‐based
amount
available
under
this
facility
was
$35,000
less
$150
in
the
form
of
LOC
as
at
December
31,
2014
and
$35,000
less
$2,181
in
the
form
of
LOC
as
at
December
31,
2013.
(5) Formula-‐based
amount
available
under
this
facility
was
$35,000
less
$17,057
in
the
form
of
LOC
as
at
December
31,
2014
and
$35,000
less
$300
(LOC)
as
at
December
31,
2013.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
107
Term
loan
facility
On
August
15,
2011,
the
Trust
entered
into
a
term
loan
facility
for
$188,000
in
the
form
of
rolling
one-‐month
BA
rates.
The
term
loan
facility
bears
interest
at
BA
rates
plus
1.85%
payable
monthly.
The
term
loan
facility
was
originally
secured
by
first-‐ranking
collateral
mortgages
on
nine
properties.
On
August
15,
2012,
the
Trust
repaid
$4,547
on
the
term
loan
facility
as
one
of
the
properties
securing
the
facility
was
sold.
At
December
31,
2013,
$183,453
was
outstanding
on
the
term
loan
facility,
secured
by
first-‐ranking
collateral
mortgages
on
eight
properties.
The
term
loan
facility
expires
on
August
15,
2016.
On
August
15,
2011,
the
Trust
entered
into
interest
rate
swap
agreements
to
modify
the
interest
rate
profile
of
the
current
variable
rate
debt
on
the
$188,000
term
loan
facility,
without
an
exchange
of
the
underlying
principal
amounts.
On
December
31,
2013,
the
notional
amount
of
interest
rate
swap
agreements
hedged
against
the
term
loan
facility
was
$183,453.
The
Trust
has
applied
hedge
accounting
to
this
relationship,
whereby
the
change
in
fair
value
of
the
effective
portion
of
the
hedging
derivative
is
recognized
in
other
comprehensive
income.
Settlement
of
both
the
fixed
and
variable
portions
of
the
interest
rate
swaps
occurs
on
a
monthly
basis.
Convertible
debentures
5.5%
Series
H
Debentures
Carrying
value
December
31,
December
31,
2014
51,160
$
2013
51,885
$
Original
Face
December
31,
December
31,
Outstanding
principal
amount
5.5%
Series
H
Debentures
December
9,
2011
March
31,
2017
$
51,650
5.5%
$
Date
issued
Maturity
date
principal
issued
interest
rate
2014
50,628
$
2013
51,128
5.5%
Series
H
Debentures
The
5.5%
Series
H
Debentures
are
convertible
at
the
request
of
the
holder,
subject
to
certain
terms
and
conditions,
into
27.25648
REIT
A
Units
per
one
thousand
dollars
of
face
value,
representing
a
conversion
price
of
$36.69
per
unit.
The
5.5%
Series
H
Debentures
are
redeemable
at
the
principal
amount
at
the
Trust’s
option,
subject
to
certain
terms
and
conditions,
from
March
31,
2015,
and
prior
to
March
31,
2016,
provided
the
20-‐day
weighted
average
trading
price
of
the
Units
is
at
least
$45.87,
and
at
their
principal
amount
on
and
after
March
31,
2016.
Interest
on
the
5.5%
Series
H
Debentures
is
payable
semi-‐annually
on
March
31
and
September
30.
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
$500
of
5.5%
Series
H
Debentures
were
converted
to
REIT
A
Units.
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013,
no
debentures
were
converted
(see
Note
19).
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
108
Debentures
The
principal
amount
outstanding
and
the
carrying
value
for
each
series
of
debentures
are
as
follows:
Debentures
Series
A
Debentures
Series
B
Debentures
Series
C
Debentures
Series
K
Debentures
Series
L
Debentures
Date
issued
Maturity
date
principal
issued
interest
rate
principal
value
Original
Face
Outstanding
Carrying
Carrying
value
December
31,
2014
December
31,
2013
June
13,
2013
June
13,
2018
$
175,000
3.42%
$
175,000
$
173,900
$
173,582
October
9,
2013
January
9,
2017
125,000
2.97%(1)
125,000
124,556
124,335
January
21,
2014
January
21,
2020
150,000
4.07%
150,000
148,813
-‐
April
26,
2011
April
26,
2016
35,000
5.95%
25,000
25,312
25,526
August
8,
2011
September
30,
2016
$
10,000
495,000
5.95%
$
10,000
485,000
10,119
482,700
$
$
10,204
333,647
(1)
Variable
interest
rate
at
three-‐month
Canadian
Dealer
Offered
Rate
(“CDOR”)
plus
1.7%.
Series
A
Debentures
On
June
13,
2013,
the
Trust
completed
the
issuance
of
$175,000
aggregate
principal
amount
of
Series
A
senior
unsecured
debentures
(“Series
A
Debentures”).
The
Series
A
Debentures
bear
interest
at
a
coupon
rate
of
3.424%
per
annum
with
a
maturity
date
of
June
13,
2018.
Interest
on
the
Series
A
Debentures
is
payable
semi-‐annually
on
June
13
and
December
13,
with
the
first
payment
commencing
on
December
13,
2013.
Costs
related
to
the
issuance
of
the
Series
A
Debentures
totalled
$1,590.
The
Trust
has
the
option
to
redeem
the
Series
A
Debentures
at
a
redemption
price
equal
to
the
greater
of
Canada
Yield
Price
and
par
plus
any
accrued
and
unpaid
interest.
The
Canada
Yield
Price
is
defined
as
the
amount
that
would
return
a
yield
on
investment
for
the
remaining
term
to
maturity
equal
to
the
Canada
bond
rate
with
equal
term
to
maturity
plus
a
spread
of
0.475%.
Series
B
Debentures
On
October
9,
2013,
the
Trust
completed
the
issuance
of
$125,000
aggregate
principal
amount
of
Series
B
floating
senior
unsecured
debentures
(“Series
B
Debentures”).
The
Series
B
Debentures
bear
interest
at
a
three-‐month
CDOR
rate
plus
1.7%
per
annum
with
a
maturity
date
of
January
9,
2017.
Interest
on
the
Series
B
Debentures
is
payable
quarterly
in
arrears
on
January
9,
April
9,
July
9
and
October
9,
with
the
first
payment
commencing
on
January
9,
2014.
Costs
related
to
the
issuance
of
the
Series
B
Debentures
totalled
$720.
Series
C
Debentures
On
January
21,
2014,
the
Trust
completed
the
issuance
of
$150,000
aggregate
principal
amount
of
Series
C
senior
unsecured
debentures
(“Series
C
Debentures”).
The
Series
C
Debentures
bear
interest
at
a
rate
of
4.074%
with
a
maturity
date
of
January
21,
2020.
Interest
on
the
Series
C
Debentures
is
payable
semi-‐annually
on
January
21
and
July
21,
with
the
first
payment
commencing
on
July
21,
2014.
Costs
related
to
the
issuance
of
the
Series
C
Debentures
totalled
$1,400.
The
Trust
has
the
option
to
redeem
the
Series
C
Debentures
at
a
redemption
price
equal
to
the
greater
of
Canada
Yield
Price
and
par
plus
any
accrued
and
unpaid
interest.
The
Canada
Yield
Price
is
defined
as
the
amount
that
would
return
a
yield
on
investment
for
the
remaining
term
to
maturity
equal
to
the
Canada
bond
rate
with
equal
term
to
maturity
plus
a
spread
of
0.525%.
Series
K
and
Series
L
Debentures
The
Series
K
and
Series
L
Debentures
are
redeemable
at
the
Trust’s
option,
subject
to
certain
terms
and
conditions.
Interest
is
payable
monthly.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
109
The
following
tables
provide
a
continuity
of
debt
for
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013:
Year
ended
December
31,
2014
Mortgages
Term
debt
Demand
revolving
credit
facilities
Term
loan
Convertible
facility
debentures
Debentures
$
$
$
$
$
103,946
78,347
-‐
825
-‐
(292)
-‐
-‐
2,477,183
231,707
(66,843)
(245,154)
(1,607)
Balance
as
at
January
1,
2014
Borrowings
Principal
repayments
Lump
sum
repayments
Financing
costs
additions
Debt
assumed
by
purchaser
on
disposal
of
investment
properties
Conversion
to
REIT
A
Units
Foreign
exchange
adjustments
Other
adjustments(1)
51,160
$
Balance
as
at
December
31,
2014
(1)
Other
adjustments
include
fair
value
adjustments,
amortization
of
financing
costs
and
amortization
of
fair
value
adjustments.
-‐
-‐
-‐
730
182,260
181,530
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
51,885
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
4,743
(2,274)
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
533
-‐
-‐
-‐
54
-‐
-‐
(500)
-‐
(225)
(182,347)
2,380,708
(17,047)
$
-‐
$
$
$
$
$
$
333,647
150,000
-‐
-‐
(1,400)
Total
3,149,016
460,054
(67,135)
(427,501)
(3,007)
-‐
-‐
-‐
453
482,700
$
(17,047)
(500)
4,743
(1,262)
3,097,361
Year
ended
December
31,
2013
Demand
revolving
credit
facilities
$
67,557
645,889
Term
loan
facility
180,837
$
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
Term
debt
248
943
(366)
-‐
-‐
Mortgages
$
$
$
2,441,663
251,049
(65,471)
(178,702)
(1,904)
Balance
as
at
January
1,
2013
Borrowings
Principal
repayments
Lump
sum
repayments
Financing
costs
additions
Debt
assumed
on
acquisition
of
investment
properties
Foreign
exchange
adjustments
Other
adjustments(1)
51,885
$
Balance
as
at
December
31,
2013
(1)
Other
adjustments
include
fair
value
adjustments,
amortization
of
financing
costs
and
amortization
of
fair
value
adjustments.
-‐
-‐
693
181,530
$
52,092
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
345
103,946
-‐
(609,567)
(278)
29,839
3,707
(2,998)
-‐
-‐
-‐
825
-‐
-‐
(207)
2,477,183
$
$
$
36,029
300,000
-‐
-‐
(2,310)
-‐
-‐
(72)
$
333,647
$
Convertible
debentures
Debentures
$
$
Total
2,778,426
1,197,881
(65,837)
(788,269)
(4,492)
29,839
3,707
(2,239)
3,149,016
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
110
Debt
weighted
average
effective
interest
rates
and
maturities
Fixed
rate
Mortgages
Term
debt
Term
loan
facility(2)
Convertible
debentures
Debentures
Total
fixed
rate
debt
Variable
rate
Mortgages
Demand
revolving
credit
facilities
Term
loan
facility(2)
Series
B
Debentures
Total
variable
rate
debt
Total
debt
Weighted
average
effective
interest
rates(1)
December
31,
December
31,
Maturity
December
31,
December
31,
Debt
amount
2014
2013
dates
2014
2013
4.43%
5.47%
3.83%
3.80%
4.04%
4.34%
3.65%
-‐
3.83%
3.09%
3.43%
4.26%
4.53%
5.91%
3.83%
3.80%
3.89%
4.42%
3.64%
2.97%
-‐
3.09%
3.20%
4.30%
$
2015–2028
2016
2016
2017
2016–2020
2015–2018
2015–2016
2016
2017
$
2,284,364
533
128,948
51,160
358,144
2,823,149
96,344
-‐
53,312
124,556
274,212
3,097,361
$
$
2,387,593
825
181,530
51,885
209,312
2,831,145
89,590
103,946
-‐
124,335
317,871
3,149,016
(1)
The
effective
interest
rate
method
includes
the
impact
of
fair
value
adjustments
on
assumed
debt
and
financing
costs.
(2)
Under
a
hedging
arrangement,
the
Trust
has
entered
into
two
interest
rate
swap
agreements
to
fix
the
interest
rate
of
the
term
loan
facility:
a
five-‐year
interest
rate
swap
on
a
notional
balance
of
$129,783,
fixing
interest
at
a
BA
rate
of
1.67%
plus
a
spread
of
185
bps;
and
a
three-‐year
interest
rate
swap
on
a
notional
balance
of
$53,670,
fixing
interest
at
a
BA
rate
of
1.28%
plus
a
spread
of
185
bps.
The
effective
interest
rate
on
the
term
loan
facility
is
3.83%
after
accounting
for
financing
costs.
On
August
15,
2014,
the
three-‐year
interest
rate
swap
expired
and
was
not
subsequently
renewed
and
effective
August
16,
2014,
the
notional
balance
of
$53,670
bears
interest
at
one-‐month
BA
rate
plus
185
bps.
The
following
table
summarizes
the
scheduled
principal
repayments
and
debt
maturities:
Term
loan
Convertible
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020–2028
Financing
costs
Fair
value
adjustments
$
$
Mortgages
365,558
339,436
307,069
218,446
91,267
1,057,552
2,379,328
(7,943)
9,323
$
2,380,708
$
Term
debt
297
236
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
533
-‐
-‐
533
$
facility
-‐
183,453
$
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
183,453
(1,193)
-‐
$
182,260
$
debentures
Debentures
$
$
-‐
-‐
50,628
-‐
-‐
-‐
50,628
-‐
532
51,160
$
-‐
35,000
125,000
175,000
-‐
150,000
485,000
(2,730)
430
482,700
$
Total
365,855
558,125
482,697
393,446
91,267
1,207,552
3,098,942
(11,866)
10,285
3,097,361
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
111
Other
financial
instruments
The
Trust
has
other
financial
instruments
included
as
part
of
other
non-‐current
liabilities
as
follows
(see
Note
16):
Fair
value
of
interest
rate
swaps
–
liability
Fair
value
of
interest
rate
swaps
–
asset
Conversion
feature
on
the
convertible
debentures
–
asset
Other
financial
instruments
–
net
liability
(asset)
December
31,
December
31,
$
$
2014
592
-‐
(760)
(168)
$
$
2013
365
(29)
(317)
19
The
Trust’s
interest
rate
swap
agreements
are
subject
to
master
netting
agreements
that
create
a
legally
enforceable
right
to
offset,
by
the
counterparty,
the
related
interest
rate
swap
financial
assets
and
liabilities.
Interest
rate
swaps
The
following
table
summarizes
the
details
of
the
interest
rate
swaps
that
are
outstanding
at
December
31,
2014:
Transaction
date
August
15,
2011
Term
loan
facility
principal
amount
(notional)
129,783
$
Fixed
interest
rate
3.52%
Financial
instrument
Maturity
date
August
15,
2016
classification
Cash
flow
hedge
$
Fair
value
592
For
those
interest
rate
swaps
designated
as
cash
flow
hedges,
the
Trust
has
assessed
that
there
is
no
ineffectiveness
in
the
hedges
of
its
interest
rate
exposure.
The
effectiveness
of
the
hedging
relationship
is
reviewed
on
a
quarterly
basis.
As
an
effective
hedge,
unrealized
gains
or
losses
on
the
interest
rate
swap
agreements
are
recognized
in
other
comprehensive
income.
The
associated
unrealized
gains
or
losses
that
are
recognized
in
other
comprehensive
income
will
be
reclassified
into
net
income
in
the
same
period
or
periods
during
which
the
interest
payments
on
the
hedged
item
affect
net
income.
On
August
15,
2014,
the
three-‐year
interest
rate
swap
on
the
notional
balance
of
$53,670
expired
and
was
not
subsequently
renewed.
As
a
result,
the
associated
unrealized
loss
of
$8
included
in
accumulated
other
comprehensive
income
was
reclassified
into
net
income
during
the
year.
At
December
31,
2014,
the
fair
value
of
the
remaining
interest
rate
swap
amounted
to
a
$592
financial
liability
(December
31,
2013
–
$336
financial
liability).
Conversion
feature
on
the
convertible
debentures
The
movement
in
the
conversion
feature
on
the
convertible
debentures
for
the
year
is
as
follows:
Balance
at
beginning
of
year
Reduction
of
conversion
feature
on
the
convertible
debentures
converted
during
the
year
Remeasurement
of
conversion
feature
on
convertible
debentures
Balance
at
end
of
year
Note
22
$
$
Year
ended
December
31,
2014
(317)
7
(450)
(760)
$
$
2013
1,397
-‐
(1,714)
(317)
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
112
Note
14
SUBSIDIARY
REDEEMABLE
UNITS
The
Trust
has
the
following
subsidiary
redeemable
units
outstanding:
Balance
at
beginning
of
year
Distribution
Reinvestment
Plan
Subsidiary
redeemable
units
surrendered
Remeasurement
of
carrying
value
of
subsidiary
redeemable
units
Balance
at
end
of
year
Note
22
Year
ended
December
31,
2014
Year
ended
December
31,
2013
Number
of
units
issued
Number
of
units
issued
and
outstanding
3,538,457
-‐
(2,936,023)
$
Amount
101,978
-‐
(85,350)
and
outstanding
3,528,658
9,799
-‐
$
Amount
132,078
361
-‐
-‐
602,434
$
(1,477)
15,151
-‐
3,538,457
$
(30,461)
101,978
During
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
the
Trust
incurred
$4,638
(December
31,
2013
–
$7,897)
in
distributions
on
the
subsidiary
redeemable
units,
which
is
included
as
interest
expense
in
comprehensive
income
(see
Note
21).
Dream
Office
LP,
a
subsidiary
of
Dream
Office
REIT,
is
authorized
to
issue
an
unlimited
number
of
LP
Class
B
limited
partnership
units.
These
units
have
been
issued
in
two
series:
subsidiary
redeemable
units
and
LP
Class
B
Units,
Series
2.
The
subsidiary
redeemable
units,
together
with
the
accompanying
Special
Trust
Units,
have
economic
and
voting
rights
equivalent
in
all
material
respects
to
REIT
A
Units.
Generally,
each
subsidiary
redeemable
unit
entitles
the
holder
to
a
distribution
equal
to
distributions
declared
on
REIT
Units,
Series
B,
or
if
no
such
distribution
is
declared,
on
REIT
Units,
Series
A.
Subsidiary
redeemable
units
may
be
surrendered
or
indirectly
exchanged
on
a
one-‐for-‐one
basis
at
the
option
of
the
holder,
generally
at
any
time
subject
to
certain
restrictions,
for
REIT
Units,
Series
B.
Holders
of
the
LP
Class
B
Units,
Series
2
are
entitled
to
vote
at
meetings
of
the
limited
partners
of
Dream
Office
LP
and
each
Unit
entitles
the
holder
to
a
distribution
equal
to
distributions
on
the
subsidiary
redeemable
units.
As
at
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013,
all
issued
and
outstanding
LP
Class
B
Units,
Series
2
are
owned
indirectly
by
the
Trust
and
have
been
eliminated
in
the
consolidated
balance
sheets.
On
July
23,
2014,
one
of
the
holders
surrendered
2,936,023
subsidiary
redeemable
units
and
received
2,936,023
REIT
B
Units.
On
July
24,
2014,
such
REIT
B
Units
were
converted
by
the
holder
into
2,936,023
REIT
A
Units.
The
exchanges
were
valued
based
on
the
carrying
amount
of
the
subsidiary
redeemable
units,
the
day
prior
to
the
exchange
to
REIT
B
Units.
Special
Trust
Units
are
issued
in
connection
with
subsidiary
redeemable
units.
The
Special
Trust
Units
are
not
transferable
separately
from
the
subsidiary
redeemable
units
to
which
they
relate
and
will
be
automatically
redeemed
for
a
nominal
amount
and
cancelled
on
surrender
or
exchange
of
such
subsidiary
redeemable
units.
Each
Special
Trust
Unit
entitles
the
holder
to
the
number
of
votes
at
any
meeting
of
unitholders
that
is
equal
to
the
number
of
REIT
B
Units
that
may
be
obtained
on
the
surrender
or
exchange
of
the
subsidiary
redeemable
units
to
which
they
relate.
As
at
December
31,
2014,
602,434
Special
Trust
Units
were
issued
and
outstanding
(December
31,
2013
–
3,538,457).
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
113
Note
15
DEFERRED
UNIT
INCENTIVE
PLAN
The
Deferred
Unit
Incentive
Plan
(“DUIP”)
provides
for
the
grant
of
deferred
trust
units
to
trustees,
officers
and
employees
as
well
as
affiliates
and
their
service
providers,
including
the
asset
manager.
Deferred
trust
units
are
granted
at
the
discretion
of
the
trustees
and
earn
income
deferred
trust
units
based
on
the
payment
of
distributions.
Once
granted,
each
deferred
trust
unit
and
the
related
distribution
of
income
deferred
trust
units
vest
evenly
over
a
three-‐
or
five-‐year
period
on
the
anniversary
date
of
the
grant.
Subject
to
an
election
option
available
for
certain
participants
to
postpone
receipt
of
REIT
A
Units,
such
units
will
be
issued
immediately
on
vesting.
As
at
December
31,
2014,
up
to
a
maximum
of
1.75
million
(December
31,
2013
–
1.75
million)
deferred
trust
units
are
issuable
under
the
DUIP.
The
movement
in
the
DUIP
balance
was
as
follows:
As
at
January
1,
2013
Compensation
expense
REIT
A
Units
issued
for
vested
deferred
trust
units
Remeasurements
of
carrying
value
of
deferred
trust
units
As
at
December
31,
2013
Compensation
expense
REIT
A
Units
issued
for
vested
deferred
trust
units
Remeasurements
of
carrying
value
of
deferred
trust
units
As
at
December
31,
2014
Note
22
22
$
$
18,754
4,087
(1,641)
(2,665)
18,535
3,707
(4,338)
(822)
17,082
During
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
$3,707
of
compensation
expense
was
recorded
(December
31,
2013
–
$4,087)
and
included
in
general
and
administrative
expenses.
For
the
same
period,
a
fair
value
gain
of
$822
(December
31,
2013
–
fair
value
gain
of
$2,665)
was
recognized,
representing
the
remeasurement
of
the
DUIP
liability
during
the
period.
Outstanding
and
payable
as
at
January
1,
2013
Granted
Income
deferred
units
REIT
A
Units
issued
Fractional
Units
paid
in
cash
Cancelled
Outstanding
and
payable
as
at
December
31,
2013
Granted
Income
deferred
units
REIT
A
Units
issued
Fractional
Units
paid
in
cash
Cancelled
Outstanding
and
payable
as
at
December
31,
2014
Vested
but
not
issued
as
at
December
31,
2014
Total
units
619,825
143,159
49,878
(44,970)
(26)
(1,828)
766,038
122,386
62,726
(157,608)
(66)
(2,177)
791,299
378,931
On
May
8,
2014,
33,086
deferred
trust
units
were
granted
to
trustees
who
elected
to
receive
their
2014
annual
retainer
in
the
form
of
deferred
trust
units
rather
than
cash.
The
grant
date
value
of
these
deferred
trust
units
was
$28.96
per
unit
granted.
On
February
27,
2014,
89,300
deferred
trust
units
were
granted
to
trustees,
officers
and
employees
as
well
as
affiliates
and
their
service
providers,
including
the
asset
manager.
Of
the
units
granted,
31,500
relate
to
key
management
personnel.
The
grant
date
value
of
these
deferred
trust
units
was
$29.36
per
unit
granted.
On
May
8,
2013,
11,859
deferred
trust
units
were
granted
to
trustees
who
elected
to
receive
their
2013
annual
retainer
in
the
form
of
deferred
trust
units
rather
than
cash.
The
grant
date
value
of
these
deferred
trust
units
was
$36.68
per
unit
granted.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
114
On
February
20,
2013,
131,300
deferred
trust
units
were
granted
to
trustees,
officers
and
employees
as
well
as
affiliates
and
their
service
providers,
including
the
asset
manager.
Of
the
units
granted,
32,000
relate
to
key
management
personnel.
The
grant
date
value
of
these
deferred
trust
units
was
$37.54
per
unit
granted.
Note
16
OTHER
NON-‐CURRENT
LIABILITIES
Tenant
security
deposits
Other
financial
instruments
–
liabilities
(assets),
net
Total
Note
17
AMOUNTS
PAYABLE
AND
ACCRUED
LIABILITIES
Trade
payables
Accrued
liabilities
and
other
payables
Accrued
interest
Rent
received
in
advance
Distributions
payable
Total
Note
13
Note
25
25
$
$
$
$
December
31,
December
31,
2014
19,103
(168)
18,935
$
$
2013
18,848
19
18,867
December
31,
December
31,
2014
3,013
49,972
12,654
11,490
20,393
97,522
$
$
2013
10,215
51,684
11,565
15,285
19,493
108,242
Note
18
DISTRIBUTIONS
Dream
Office
REIT’s
Declaration
of
Trust
endeavours
to
maintain
monthly
distribution
payments
to
unitholders
payable
on
or
about
the
15th
day
of
the
following
month.
The
Trust
determines
the
distribution
rate
by,
among
other
considerations,
its
assessment
of
cash
flow
as
determined
using
adjusted
cash
flows
from
operating
activities,
which
includes
cash
flows
from
operating
activities
of
our
investments
in
joint
ventures
that
are
equity
accounted
and
excludes
the
fluctuations
in
non-‐cash
working
capital,
transaction
costs
on
business
combinations
and
investment
in
lease
incentives
and
initial
direct
leasing
costs.
Adjusted
cash
flows
from
operating
activities
is
not
a
measure
defined
by
IFRS
and
therefore
may
not
be
comparable
to
similar
measures
presented
by
other
real
estate
investment
trusts.
The
distribution
rate
is
determined
by
the
trustees,
at
their
sole
discretion,
based
on
what
they
consider
appropriate
given
the
circumstances
of
the
Trust.
Distributions
may
be
adjusted
for
amounts
paid
in
prior
periods
if
the
actual
adjusted
cash
flows
from
operating
activities
for
those
prior
periods
is
greater
or
less
than
the
estimates
used
for
those
prior
periods.
In
addition,
the
trustees
may
declare
distributions
out
of
the
income,
net
realized
capital
gains,
net
recapture
income
and
capital
of
the
Trust,
to
the
extent
such
amounts
have
not
already
been
paid,
allocated
or
distributed.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
115
The
following
table
summarizes
distribution
payments
for
the
year
ended
December
31:
Paid
in
cash
Paid
by
way
of
reinvestment
in
REIT
A
Units
Less:
Payable
at
December
31,
2013
(December
31,
2012)
Plus:
Payable
at
December
31,
2014
(December
31,
2013)
Total
2014
175,912
63,248
(19,493)
20,393
240,060
$
$
$
$
Total
2013
180,444
47,899
(18,056)
19,493
229,780
On
December
17,
2014,
the
Trust
announced
a
cash
distribution
of
$0.18666
per
REIT
A
Unit
for
the
month
of
December
2014.
The
amount
payable
at
December
31,
2014
was
satisfied
on
January
15,
2015
by
$14,256
in
cash
and
$5,891
in
connection
with
the
issuance
of
228,186
REIT
A
Units.
On
January
20,
2015,
the
Trust
announced
a
cash
distribution
of
$0.18666
per
REIT
A
Unit
for
the
month
of
January
2015.
The
January
2015
distribution
was
satisfied
on
February
15,
2015
by
$13,494
in
cash
and
$6,597
in
connection
with
the
issuance
of
252,044
REIT
A
Units.
On
February
18,
2015,
the
Trust
announced
a
cash
distribution
of
$0.18666
per
REIT
A
Unit
for
the
month
of
February
2015.
The
February
2015
distribution
will
be
payable
on
March
16,
2015
to
unitholders
on
record
at
February
27,
2015.
During
2014,
the
Trust
declared
monthly
distributions
of
$0.18666
per
unit,
or
$2.24
per
unit
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014.
During
2013,
the
Trust
declared
monthly
distributions
of
$0.183
per
unit
up
to
March
31,
2013
and
$0.18666
per
unit
thereafter,
or
$2.229
per
unit
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013.
Note
19
EQUITY
REIT
A
Units
Retained
earnings
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
income
Total
December
31,
2014
December
31,
2013
Number
of
REIT
A
Units
107,936,575
$
-‐
-‐
107,936,575
$
Amount
3,171,794
601,495
4,228
3,777,517
Number
of
REIT
A
Units
103,420,221
$
-‐
-‐
103,420,221
$
Amount
3,039,189
682,265
1,684
3,723,138
Dream
Office
REIT
Units
Dream
Office
REIT
is
authorized
to
issue
an
unlimited
number
of
REIT
Units
and
an
unlimited
number
of
Special
Trust
Units.
The
REIT
Units
are
divided
into
and
issuable
in
two
series:
REIT
Units,
Series
A
and
REIT
Units,
Series
B.
The
Special
Trust
Units
may
only
be
issued
to
holders
of
subsidiary
redeemable
units.
REIT
Units,
Series
A
and
REIT
Units,
Series
B
represent
an
undivided
beneficial
interest
in
Dream
Office
REIT
and
in
distributions
made
by
Dream
Office
REIT.
No
REIT
Unit,
Series
A
or
REIT
Unit,
Series
B
has
preference
or
priority
over
any
other.
Each
REIT
Unit,
Series
A
and
REIT
Unit,
Series
B
entitles
the
holder
to
one
vote
at
all
meetings
of
unitholders.
Public
offering
of
REIT
A
Units
On
May
1,
2013,
the
Trust
completed
a
public
offering
of
6,353,750
REIT
A
Units,
including
an
over-‐allotment
option,
at
a
price
of
$36.20
per
unit,
for
gross
proceeds
of
$230,006.
Costs
related
to
the
offering
totalled
$9,700
and
were
charged
directly
to
unitholders’
equity.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
116
Distribution
Reinvestment
and
Unit
Purchase
Plan
The
Distribution
Reinvestment
and
Unit
Purchase
Plan
(“DRIP”)
allows
holders
of
REIT
A
Units
or
subsidiary
redeemable
units,
other
than
unitholders
who
are
resident
of
or
present
in
the
U.S.,
to
elect
to
have
all
cash
distributions
from
Dream
Office
REIT
reinvested
in
additional
units.
Unitholders
who
participate
in
the
DRIP
receive
an
additional
distribution
of
units
equal
to
4%
of
each
cash
distribution
that
was
reinvested.
The
price
per
unit
is
calculated
by
reference
to
a
five-‐day
weighted
average
closing
price
of
the
REIT
A
Units
on
the
Toronto
Stock
Exchange
(“TSX”)
preceding
the
relevant
distribution
date,
which
typically
is
on
or
about
the
15th
day
of
the
month
following
the
declaration.
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
2,236,530
REIT
A
Units
were
issued
under
the
DRIP
for
$63,248
(December
31,
2013
–
1,509,148
REIT
A
Units
for
$47,899).
The
Unit
Purchase
Plan
feature
of
the
DRIP
facilitates
the
purchase
of
additional
REIT
A
Units
by
existing
unitholders.
Participation
in
the
Unit
Purchase
Plan
is
optional
and
subject
to
certain
limitations
on
the
maximum
number
of
additional
REIT
A
Units
that
may
be
acquired.
The
price
per
unit
is
calculated
in
the
same
manner
as
the
DRIP.
No
commission,
service
charges
or
brokerage
fees
are
payable
by
participants
in
connection
with
either
the
reinvestment
or
purchase
features
of
the
DRIP.
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
4,765
REIT
A
Units
were
issued
under
the
Unit
Purchase
Plan
for
$135
(December
31,
2013
–
12,212
REIT
A
Units
for
$429).
Debenture
conversions
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
$500
of
5.5%
Series
H
Debentures
were
converted
for
13,628
REIT
A
Units.
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013,
no
debentures
were
converted.
Exchange
of
REIT
B
Units
for
REIT
A
Units
On
July
24,
2014,
2,936,023
REIT
B
Units
were
exchanged
for
2,936,023
REIT
A
Units
totalling
$85,350.
The
exchange
was
valued
based
on
the
carrying
amount
of
the
subsidiary
redeemable
units,
the
day
prior
to
the
exchange
to
REIT
B
Units.
Normal
course
issuer
bid
The
Trust
renewed
its
normal
course
issuer
bid,
which
commenced
on
June
20,
2014
and
will
remain
in
effect
until
the
earlier
of
June
19,
2015
or
the
date
on
which
the
Trust
has
purchased
the
maximum
number
of
REIT
A
Units
permitted
under
the
bid.
Under
the
bid,
the
Trust
has
the
ability
to
purchase
for
cancellation
up
to
a
maximum
of
10,298,296
REIT
A
Units
(representing
10%
of
the
Trust’s
public
float
of
102,982,963
REIT
A
Units
at
the
time
of
entering
the
bid
through
the
facilities
of
the
TSX).
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
832,200
REIT
A
Units
had
been
purchased
and
subsequently
cancelled
under
the
bid
for
a
total
cost
of
$20,924
(December
31,
2013
–
2,134,800
REIT
A
Units
cancelled
for
$60,665).
Subsequent
to
year-‐end,
the
Trust
purchased
an
additional
835,000
REIT
A
Units
under
the
normal
course
issuer
bid
for
cancellation
for
a
total
cost
of
$22,348.
Short
form
base
shelf
prospectus
On
November
26,
2012,
the
Trust
issued
a
short
form
base
shelf
prospectus,
which
is
valid
for
a
25-‐month
period,
during
which
time
the
Trust
may
offer
and
issue,
from
time
to
time,
units
and
debt
securities
convertible
into
or
exchangeable
for
units
of
the
Trust,
or
any
combination
thereof,
with
an
aggregate
offering
price
of
up
to
$2,000,000.
The
short
form
base
shelf
prospectus
expired
on
December
26,
2014,
and
has
not
yet
been
renewed.
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
the
Trust
completed
the
issuance
of
$150,000
aggregate
principal
amount
of
senior
unsecured
debentures
(December
31,
2013
–
$300,000)
under
the
short
form
base
shelf
prospectus.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
117
Note
20
ASSETS
HELD
FOR
SALE
AND
DISPOSITIONS
Assets
held
for
sale
As
at
December
31,
2014,
the
Trust
held
an
investment
in
a
joint
venture
totalling
$2,968
(December
31,
2013
–
$15,921)
as
assets
held
for
sale.
The
Trust’s
share
of
the
joint
venture’s
assets
and
liabilities
were
$2,990
and
$22,
respectively
(December
31,
2013
–
$21,619
and
$5,698,
respectively).
At
December
31,
2014,
management
had
committed
to
a
plan
of
sale
of
the
underlying
properties,
and
therefore
the
investment
in
the
joint
ventures
has
been
reclassified
as
assets
held
for
sale.
During
the
year,
the
Trust
disposed
of
its
investment
in
certain
joint
ventures
totalling
$12,597.
The
Trust’s
share
of
the
disposed
joint
venture
assets
and
liabilities
were
$18,179
and
$5,582,
respectively.
As
a
result
of
the
sale,
the
Trust
recognized
a
net
loss
of
$738.
Dispositions
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
the
following
dispositions
were
completed:
Property
9705
Horton
Road,
Calgary
26229
Township
Road
531,
Edmonton(4)
11404
Winterburn
Road
NW,
Edmonton(4)
16134
-‐
114th
Avenue
NW,
Edmonton(4)
16104
-‐
114th
Avenue
NW,
Edmonton(4)
St.
Albert
Trail
Centre,
Edmonton
Total
(1)
Gross
proceeds
before
transaction
costs.
Property
type
office
flex
flex
flex
flex
office
Disposed
GLA
(sq.
ft.)
55,363
89,165
81,917
48,353
28,759
48,402
351,959
Gross
(1)
proceeds
Mortgages
discharged
Loss
(2)
on
sale
$
$
9,150
12,084
10,489
3,938
6,281
12,075
54,017
$
$
5,919(3)
$
5,529(3)
5,599(3)
2,651
2,030
6,389
28,117
$
(173)
(68)
(24)
(44)
(5)
(424)
(738)
Date
disposed
June
12,
2014
September
9,
2014
September
9,
2014
September
9,
2014
September
9,
2014
September
15,
2014
(2)
Loss
on
sale
includes
the
write-‐off
of
financing
costs
and
fair
value
adjustments
associated
with
the
debt
discharged,
transaction
costs
and
the
write-‐off
of
goodwill
associated
with
the
cash-‐generating
unit.
(3)
Mortgages
assumed
by
purchasers
on
disposal
of
investment
properties.
(4)
These
investment
properties
were
sold
to
Dream
Industrial
REIT
(refer
to
Note
9
and
Note
25).
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013,
the
following
dispositions
were
completed:
Property
625
University
Park
Drive,
Regina
2640,
2510–2550
Quance
Street,
Regina
Total
(1)
Gross
proceeds
before
transaction
costs.
Property
Disposed
GLA
type
office
office
(sq.
ft.)
17,145
69,554
86,699
$
$
Gross
proceeds(1)
5,182
16,300
21,482
$
$
Mortgages
discharged
-‐
8,767
8,767
$
$
Loss
on
sale(2)
(68)
(215)
(283)
Date
disposed
January
31,
2013
January
31,
2013
(2)
Loss
on
sale
includes
the
write-‐off
of
financing
costs
and
fair
value
adjustments
associated
with
the
debt
discharged,
transaction
costs
and
the
write-‐off
of
goodwill
associated
with
the
cash-‐generating
unit.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
118
Note
21
INTEREST
Interest
on
debt
Interest
on
debt
incurred
and
charged
to
comprehensive
income
is
recorded
as
follows:
Interest
expense
incurred,
at
contractual
and
hedged
rate
of
debt
Amortization
of
financing
costs
Amortization
of
fair
value
adjustments
on
assumed
debt
Interest
expense
Add
(deduct):
Amortization
of
financing
costs
Amortization
of
fair
value
adjustments
on
assumed
debt
Change
in
accrued
interest
Cash
interest
paid
Year
ended
December
31,
2014
136,528
$
3,178
(4,754)
134,952
(3,178)
4,754
(1,736)
134,792
$
2013
133,768
3,034
(6,633)
130,169
(3,034)
6,633
(580)
133,188
$
$
Certain
debts
assumed
in
connection
with
acquisitions
have
been
adjusted
to
fair
value
using
the
estimated
market
interest
rate
at
the
time
of
the
acquisition
(“fair
value
adjustments”).
Fair
value
adjustments
are
amortized
to
interest
expense
over
the
expected
life
of
the
debt
using
the
effective
interest
rate
method.
Non-‐cash
adjustments
to
interest
expense
are
recorded
as
a
change
in
non-‐cash
working
capital
in
the
consolidated
statements
of
cash
flows.
Interest
on
subsidiary
redeemable
units
Interest
payments
charged
to
comprehensive
income
are
recorded
as
follows:
Paid
in
cash
Paid
by
way
of
reinvestment
in
subsidiary
redeemable
units
Less:
Interest
payable
at
December
31,
2013
(December
31,
2012)
Plus:
Interest
payable
at
December
31,
2014
(December
31,
2013)
Total
Note
22
FAIR
VALUE
ADJUSTMENTS
TO
FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS
Remeasurement
of
conversion
feature
on
convertible
debentures
Remeasurement
of
carrying
value
of
subsidiary
redeemable
units
Remeasurement
of
carrying
value
of
deferred
trust
units
Year
ended
December
31,
2014
5,186
$
-‐
(660)
112
4,638
$
2013
7,524
361
(648)
660
7,897
$
$
Note
13
14
15
$
$
Year
ended
December
31,
2014
450
1,477
822
2,749
$
$
2013
1,714
30,461
2,665
34,840
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
119
Note
23
INCOME
TAXES
The
Trust
is
subject
to
taxation
in
the
U.S.
on
the
taxable
income
earned
by
its
investment
properties
located
in
the
U.S.
at
a
rate
of
approximately
38.46%
(December
31,
2013
–
38.46%).
A
deferred
tax
asset
arises
from
the
loss
carry-‐forwards
of
the
U.S.
subsidiaries.
A
deferred
tax
liability
arises
from
the
temporary
differences
between
the
carrying
value
and
the
tax
basis
of
the
net
assets
of
the
U.S.
subsidiaries.
The
tax
effects
of
temporary
differences
arise
from
investment
properties.
The
loss
carry-‐
forwards
and
the
tax
effects
of
temporary
differences
that
give
rise
to
the
recognition
of
deferred
tax
assets
and
liabilities
are
presented
below:
Deferred
tax
assets
Deferred
financing
costs
Financial
instruments
Loss
carry-‐forwards
Deferred
tax
liabilities
Investment
properties
Deferred
tax
liabilities,
net
December
31,
December
31,
2014
2013
$
$
$
327
1,350
915
2,592
-‐
-‐
1,484
1,484
(8,775)
(6,183)
$
(6,651)
(5,167)
A
reconciliation
between
the
expected
income
taxes
based
upon
the
2014
and
2013
statutory
rates
and
the
income
tax
expense
recognized
during
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013
are
as
follows:
Income
taxes
computed
at
the
statutory
rate
of
nil
that
is
applicable
to
the
Trust
Deferred
income
tax
expense
on
U.S.
properties
December
31,
December
31,
$
$
2014
-‐
638
638
$
$
2013
-‐
344
344
As
part
of
the
deferred
tax
balance,
$378
is
a
result
of
foreign
exchange
differences
for
the
U.S.
properties.
This
amount
is
included
as
part
of
other
comprehensive
income
under
unrealized
foreign
currency
translation
gain.
Note
24
SEGMENTED
INFORMATION
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
the
Trust’s
reportable
operating
segments
of
its
investment
properties
and
results
of
operations
were
segmented
into
geographic
segments,
namely
Western
Canada,
Calgary
downtown,
Calgary
suburban,
Toronto
downtown,
Toronto
suburban
and
Eastern
Canada.
Corporate
amounts,
lease
termination
fees,
bad
debt
expense,
straight-‐line
rent
and
amortization
of
lease
incentives,
and
revenue
and
expenses
related
to
properties
held
for
redevelopment,
properties
acquired
after
January
1,
2013
and
assets
held
for
sale,
were
included
in
“Other”
for
segment
disclosure.
The
Trust
did
not
allocate
interest
expense
to
these
segments
since
leverage
is
viewed
as
a
corporate
function.
The
decision
as
to
where
to
incur
the
debt
is
largely
based
on
minimizing
the
cost
of
debt
and
is
not
specifically
related
to
the
segments.
Similarly,
other
income,
other
expenses,
fair
value
adjustments,
net
gains
(losses)
on
transactions
and
other
activities,
and
deferred
income
taxes
were
not
allocated
to
the
segments.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
120
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
the
segments
include
the
Trust’s
proportionate
share
of
its
joint
ventures.
The
column
entitled
“Reconciliation”
adjusts
the
segmented
results
to
account
for
these
joint
ventures
using
the
equity
method
of
accounting
as
applied
in
these
consolidated
financial
statements.
Year
ended
December
31,
2014
Operations
Investment
properties
Western
Canada
Calgary
downtown
Calgary
suburban
Toronto
downtown
Toronto
suburban
Eastern
Canada
Segment
total(1)
Other(2)
Reconciliation(1)
Total
revenue
$
136,448
$
113,869
$
19,057
$
226,365
$
114,293
$
142,126
$
752,158
$
65,837
$
(112,716)
$
705,279
Investment
properties
operating
expenses
(52,641)
(44,938)
(8,774)
(105,857)
(50,969)
(65,042)
(328,221)
(27,824)
52,274
(303,771)
Net
rental
income
(segment
income)
83,807
68,931
10,283
120,508
63,324
77,084
423,937
38,013
(60,442)
401,508
Other
income
Other
expenses
Fair
value
adjustments,
net
gains
(losses)
on
transactions
and
other
activities
Income
before
income
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
19,199
(184,681)
37,576
56,775
17,728
(166,953)
-‐
(136,540)
5,138
(131,402)
taxes
83,807
68,931
10,283
120,508
63,324
77,084
423,937
(264,009)
Deferred
income
taxes
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
(638)
Net
income
for
the
year
$
83,807
$
68,931
$
10,283
$
120,508
$
63,324
$
77,084
$
423,937
$
(264,647)
$
-‐
-‐
159,928
(638)
-‐
$
159,290
Year
ended
December
31,
2014
Western
Canada
Calgary
downtown
Calgary
suburban
Toronto
downtown
Toronto
suburban
Eastern
Canada
Segment
total(1)
Other(3)
Reconciliation(1)(4)
Total
Capital
expenditures(5)
Investment
properties
$
$
13,189
$
17,685
$
2,132
$
17,074
$
14,492
$
17,473
$
82,045
$
1,155
$
(5,807)
$
77,393
1,395,943
$
1,162,981
$
183,969
$
2,409,667
$
962,942
$
1,076,344
$
7,191,846
$
12,750
$
(1,065,526)
$
6,139,070
(1) Includes
the
Trustʼs
proportionate
share
of
its
joint
ventures,
accounted
for
using
the
equity
method
of
accounting.
(2) Includes
corporate
amounts,
lease
termination
fees,
bad
debt
expense,
straight-‐line
rent
and
amortization
of
lease
incentives,
and
revenue
and
expenses
related
to
properties
held
for
redevelopment,
properties
acquired
after
January
1,
2013
and
assets
held
for
sale.
(3) Includes
properties
held
for
redevelopment,
assets
held
for
sale
and
sold
properties.
(4) Includes
assets
held
for
sale.
(5) Includes
building
improvements
and
initial
direct
leasing
costs
and
lease
incentives.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
121
Year
ended
December
31,
2013
Operations
Investment
properties
Western
Canada
Calgary
downtown
Calgary
suburban
Toronto
downtown
Toronto
suburban
Eastern
Canada
Segment
total(1)
Other(2)
Reconciliation(1)
Total
revenue
$
135,975
$
111,127
$
19,471
$
225,778
$
117,284
$
140,848
$
750,483
$
50,048
$
(113,359)
$
687,172
Investment
properties
operating
expenses
(53,960)
(42,693)
(9,074)
(107,379)
(51,418)
(64,217)
(328,741)
(18,902)
51,971
(295,672)
Net
rental
income
(segment
income)
82,015
68,434
10,397
118,399
65,866
76,631
421,742
Other
income
Other
expenses
Fair
value
adjustments,
net
gains
(losses)
on
transactions
and
other
activities
Income
before
income
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
31,146
20,387
(61,388)
391,500
84,327
104,714
(182,858)
18,406
(164,452)
-‐
-‐
-‐
154,938
(41,345)
113,593
taxes
82,015
68,434
10,397
118,399
65,866
76,631
421,742
23,613
Deferred
income
taxes
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
(344)
Net
income
for
the
year
$
82,015
$
68,434
$
10,397
$
118,399
$
65,866
$
76,631
$
421,742
$
23,269
$
-‐
-‐
445,355
(344)
-‐
$
445,011
Year
ended
December
31,
2013
Capital
expenditures(5)
Western
Canada
Calgary
downtown
Calgary
suburban
Toronto
downtown
Toronto
suburban
Eastern
Canada
Segment
total(1)
Other(3)
Reconciliation(1)(4)
Total
$
9,001
$
21,231
$
752
$
19,519
$
14,611
$
8,676
$
73,790
$
1,735
$
(7,060)
$
68,465
Investment
properties
$
1,445,127
$
1,203,684
$
183,927
$
2,365,230
$
967,882
$
1,072,085
$
7,237,935
$
85,667
$
(1,081,917)
$
6,241,685
(1) Includes
the
Trustʼs
proportionate
share
of
its
joint
ventures,
accounted
for
using
the
equity
method
of
accounting.
(2) Includes
corporate
amounts,
lease
termination
fees,
bad
debt
expense,
straight-‐line
rent
and
amortization
of
lease
incentives,
and
revenue
and
expenses
related
to
properties
held
for
redevelopment,
properties
acquired
after
January
1,
2013
and
assets
held
for
sale.
(3) Includes
properties
held
for
redevelopment,
assets
held
for
sale
and
sold
properties.
(4) Includes
assets
held
for
sale.
(5) Includes
building
improvements
and
initial
direct
leasing
costs
and
lease
incentives.
Note
25
RELATED
PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
AND
ARRANGEMENTS
From
time
to
time,
Dream
Office
REIT
and
its
subsidiaries
enter
into
transactions
with
related
parties
that
are
conducted
under
normal
commercial
terms.
Dream
Office
REIT,
Dream
Office
Management
LP,
formerly
known
as
Dundee
Management
Limited
Partnership
(a
wholly
owned
subsidiary
of
Dream
Office
LP)
and
Dream
Asset
Management
Corp.
(“DAM”),
formerly
known
as
Dundee
Realty
Corporation,
a
subsidiary
of
Dream
Unlimited
Corp.,
are
parties
to
an
administrative
services
agreement
(the
“Services
Agreement
with
DAM”).
Effective
August
24,
2007,
Dream
Office
REIT
also
has
an
asset
management
agreement
(the
“Asset
Management
Agreement”)
with
DAM
pursuant
to
which
DAM
provides
certain
asset
management
services
to
Dream
Office
REIT
and
its
subsidiaries.
Effective
December
1,
2013,
Dream
Office
REIT
and
DAM
entered
into
a
Shared
Services
and
Cost
Sharing
Agreement.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
122
Asset
Management
Agreement
The
Asset
Management
Agreement
provides
for
a
broad
range
of
asset
management
services
for
the
following
fees:
•
•
•
•
•
base
annual
management
fee
calculated
and
payable
on
a
monthly
basis,
equal
to
0.25%
of
the
gross
asset
value
of
properties,
defined
as
the
fair
value
of
the
properties
at
August
23,
2007
(the
date
of
the
sale
of
our
portfolio
of
properties
in
Eastern
Canada)
plus
the
purchase
price
of
properties
acquired
subsequent
to
that
date,
adjusted
for
any
properties
sold;
incentive
fee
equal
to
15%
of
Dream
Office
REIT’s
adjusted
funds
from
operations
per
unit
in
excess
of
$2.65
per
unit;
capital
expenditures
fee
equal
to
5%
of
all
hard
construction
costs
incurred
on
each
capital
project
with
costs
in
excess
of
$1,000,
excluding
work
done
on
behalf
of
tenants
or
any
maintenance
capital
expenditures;
acquisition
fee,
calculated
over
a
fiscal
year
based
on
the
anniversary
date
of
the
Asset
Management
Agreement,
equal
to:
(i)
1.0%
of
the
purchase
price
of
a
property
on
the
first
$100,000
of
properties
acquired;
(ii)
0.75%
of
the
purchase
price
of
a
property
on
the
next
$100,000
of
properties
acquired;
and
(iii)
0.50%
of
the
purchase
price
of
a
property
acquired
in
excess
of
$200,000
of
properties
acquired;
and
financing
fee
equal
to
the
lesser
of
actual
expenses
incurred
by
DAM
in
supplying
services
relating
to
financing
transactions
and
0.25%
of
the
debt
and
equity
of
all
financing
transactions
completed
on
behalf
of
Dream
Office
REIT.
Pursuant
to
the
Asset
Management
Agreement
with
DAM,
the
following
is
a
summary
of
fees
incurred
for
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013:
Base
annual
management
fee
(included
in
general
and
administrative
expenses)
Acquisition
fee
(included
in
acquisition
related
costs/investment
properties)
Expense
reimbursements
related
to
financing
arrangements
(included
in
debt/unitholdersʼ
equity)
Total
incurred
under
the
Asset
Management
Agreement
Year
ended
December
31,
2014
$
17,093
$
-‐
319
17,412
$
$
2013
16,568
3,201
825
20,594
Shared
Services
and
Cost
Sharing
Agreement
The
existing
Asset
Management
Agreement
provides
the
Trust
and
DAM,
from
time
to
time,
the
opportunity
to
agree
on
additional
services
to
be
provided
to
the
Trust
for
which
DAM
is
to
be
reimbursed
for
its
costs.
To
formalize
and
expand
this
arrangement,
the
Trust
entered
into
a
Shared
Services
and
Cost
Sharing
Agreement
with
DAM
on
December
1,
2013.
The
agreement
is
for
a
one-‐year
term
and
will
be
automatically
renewed
for
further
one-‐year
terms
unless
and
until
the
agreement
is
terminated
in
accordance
with
its
terms
or
by
mutual
agreement
of
the
parties.
Pursuant
to
the
agreement,
DAM
will
be
providing
additional
administrative
and
support
services
in
order
to
expand
and
improve
DAM’s
service
capability
in
connection
with
the
provision
of
its
asset
management
services.
DAM
will
receive
an
annual
fee
sufficient
to
reimburse
it
for
all
the
expenses
incurred
in
providing
these
additional
administrative
and
support
services.
Additionally,
the
Trust
will
also
reimburse
DAM
in
each
calendar
year
for
its
share
of
costs
incurred
in
connection
with
certain
business
transformation
services
provided
by
DAM.
Pursuant
to
the
Shared
Services
and
Cost
Sharing
Agreement
with
DAM,
the
following
is
a
summary
of
fees
incurred
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013:
Business
transformation
costs
Strategic
services
and
other
Total
costs
incurred
under
the
Shared
Services
and
Cost
Sharing
Agreement
Year
ended
December
31,
2014
1,100
405
1,505
$
$
$
$
2013
-‐
-‐
-‐
The
Trust’s
future
commitment
under
the
Shared
Services
and
Cost
Sharing
Agreement,
which
expires
on
December
1,
2020,
is
$5,490.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
123
Services
Agreement
with
DAM
Pursuant
to
the
Services
Agreement
with
DAM,
the
Trust
received
from
or
paid
to
DAM
costs
incurred
on
behalf
of
the
other
party.
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
the
Trust
processed
on
behalf
of
DAM
certain
costs
and
shared
services
of
$5,007
(year
ended
December
31,
2013
–
$8,525).
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
the
Trust
processed
on
behalf
of
DAM,
at
cost,
operating
and
administration
costs
of
regional
offices
of
$8,705
(year
ended
December
31,
2013
–
$14,412).
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
DAM
processed
certain
costs
on
behalf
of
the
Trust
of
$37
(year
ended
December
31,
2013
–
$1,429).
Services
Agreement
with
Dream
Industrial
REIT
Effective
October
4,
2012,
Dream
Office
Management
Corp.
and
Dream
Industrial
REIT
entered
into
a
Services
Agreement,
in
which
the
Trust
provides
certain
services
to
Dream
Industrial
REIT
on
a
cost
recovery
basis.
The
following
is
a
summary
of
the
cost
recoveries
from
Dream
Industrial
REIT
for
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013:
Cost
recoveries
from
Dream
Industrial
REIT:
Total
cost
recoveries
from
Dream
Industrial
REIT
Year
ended
December
31,
2014
5,999
$
5,999
$
2013
5,130
5,130
$
$
Other
transactions
with
Dream
Industrial
REIT
As
discussed
in
Note
9
and
Note
20,
the
Trust
completed
the
sale
of
four
investment
properties
to
Dream
Industrial
REIT
on
September
9,
2014.
A
total
loss
of
$141
was
recognized
in
the
statements
of
comprehensive
income
upon
disposal
and
related
to
the
write-‐off
of
financing
costs
and
fair
value
adjustments
associated
with
the
debt
discharged,
transaction
costs
and
the
write-‐off
of
goodwill
associated
with
the
cash-‐generating
unit.
Amounts
due
to/from
related
parties
Amounts
due
from
DAM:
Services
Agreement
with
DAM
Parking
revenue
received
on
behalf
of
the
Trust
Total
amounts
due
from
DAM
Amounts
due
to/(from)
DAM:
Asset
Management
Agreement
with
DAM
Shared
Services
and
Cost
Sharing
Agreement
with
DAM
Total
amounts
due
to
DAM
Amounts
due
from
Dream
Industrial
REIT:
Service
Agreement
with
Dream
Industrial
REIT
Distributions
from
Dream
Industrial
REIT
Total
amounts
due
from
Dream
Industrial
REIT
Total
amounts
due
to
Dream
Industrial
REIT
related
to
Dream
Industrial
REIT
properties
December
31,
December
31,
2014
2013
447
$
546
993
$
2,815
2,386
5,201
December
31,
December
31,
2014
2013
(245)
$
97
(148)
$
3,332
-‐
3,332
December
31,
December
31,
2014
2013
808
$
1,082
1,890
35
$
917
950
1,867
75
$
$
$
$
$
$
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
124
Compensation
of
key
management
personnel
Compensation
of
key
management
personnel
for
the
years
ended
December
31
is
as
follows:
Year
ended
December
31,
Unit-‐based
awards(1)
(1)
Deferred
trust
units
granted
vest
over
a
five-‐year
period
with
one
fifth
of
the
deferred
trust
units
vesting
each
year.
Amounts
are
determined
based
on
the
$
$
2014
925
2013
1,201
grant
date
fair
value
of
deferred
trust
units
multiplied
by
the
number
of
deferred
trust
units
granted
in
the
year.
Note
26
SUPPLEMENTARY
CASH
FLOW
INFORMATION
The
components
of
amortization
and
depreciation
under
operating
activities
include:
Year
ended
December
31,
Amortization
of
lease
incentives
Amortization
of
external
management
contracts
Amortization
of
financing
costs
Amortization
of
fair
value
adjustments
on
assumed
debt
Depreciation
on
property
and
equipment
Total
amortization
and
depreciation
The
components
of
changes
in
other
adjustments
under
operating
activities
include:
Reinvestment
in
subsidiary
redeemable
units
Debt
settlement
and
Unit
issue
costs
Net
loss
on
sale
of
investment
properties
Deferred
unit
compensation
expense
Straight-‐line
rent
adjustment
Deferred
income
taxes
Total
other
adjustments
Note
8
11
21
21
Note
21
32
20,
32
15
23
$
$
$
2014
$
9,893
$
1,292
3,178
(4,754)
1,678
11,287
$
2013
6,471
1,338
3,034
(6,633)
1,189
5,399
Year
ended
December
31,
2014
-‐
1,927
738
3,707
(3,929)
638
3,081
$
$
2013
361
(241)
283
4,087
(6,767)
344
(1,933)
The
components
of
the
changes
in
non-‐cash
working
capital
under
operating
activities
include:
Decrease
in
amounts
receivable
Decrease
in
prepaid
expenses
and
other
assets
Decrease
in
other
non-‐current
assets
Decrease
in
amounts
payable
and
accrued
liabilities
Increase
in
non-‐current
liabilities
Change
in
non-‐cash
working
capital
The
following
amounts
were
paid
on
account
of
interest:
Interest:
Debt
Subsidiary
redeemable
units
Year
ended
December
31,
2014
12,043
857
794
(8,301)
255
5,648
$
$
2013
2,642
264
47
(12,896)
877
(9,066)
$
$
Note
21
21
Year
ended
December
31,
2014
2013
$
134,792
5,186
$
133,188
7,524
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
125
Note
27
ACCUMULATED
OTHER
COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME
(LOSS)
Unrealized
gain
(loss)
on
interest
rate
swaps
Unrealized
foreign
currency
translation
gain
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
income
(loss)
$
$
(336)
$
2,020
1,684
$
Opening
balance
January
1
Net
change
during
the
change
2014
Closing
balance
year
December
31
(1,002)
5,230
4,228
(666)
3,210
2,544
$
$
Opening
balance
January
1
$
$
(375)
$
78
(297)
$
Year
ended
December
31,
2013
Closing
balance
December
31
(336)
$
2,020
1,684
Net
change
during
the
year
39
1,942
1,981
$
Note
28
COMMITMENTS
AND
CONTINGENCIES
Dream
Office
REIT
and
its
operating
subsidiaries
are
contingently
liable
under
guarantees
that
are
issued
in
the
normal
course
of
business
and
with
respect
to
litigation
and
claims
that
arise
from
time
to
time.
In
the
opinion
of
management,
any
liability
that
may
arise
from
such
contingencies
would
not
have
a
material
adverse
effect
on
the
consolidated
financial
statements
of
Dream
Office
REIT.
At
December
31,
2014,
Dream
Office
REIT’s
future
minimum
commitments
under
operating
leases,
finance
leases,
and
fixed
price
contracts
to
purchase
electricity
are
as
follows:
Operating
lease
payments
Finance
lease
payments
Electricity
Total
<
1
year
1,019
28
5,788
6,835
$
$
$
$
1–5
years
1,183
35
2,873
4,091
$
$
Minimum
payments
due
>
5
years
8,288
-‐
-‐
8,288
Total
10,490
63
8,661
19,214
$
$
During
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
the
Trust
paid
$1,065
(December
31,
2013
–
$1,122)
in
minimum
lease
payments,
which
has
been
included
in
comprehensive
income
for
the
period.
The
Trust
has
entered
into
lease
agreements
that
may
require
tenant
improvement
costs
of
approximately
$26,366.
The
Trustʼs
share
of
contingent
liabilities
arising
from
its
investments
in
joint
ventures
is
as
follows:
Contingent
liabilities
for
the
obligation
of
the
other
owners
of
investments
in
joint
ventures
$
December
31,
December
31,
2014
282,738
$
2013
305,850
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
126
Note
29
CAPITAL
MANAGEMENT
The
primary
objectives
of
the
Trust’s
capital
management
are
to
ensure
it
remains
within
its
quantitative
banking
covenants
and
to
improve
its
credit
rating.
The
Trust
was
assigned
for
the
first
time
a
credit
rating
of
BBB
(low)
with
a
stable
trend
as
part
of
the
Series
A
and
Series
B
Debentures
offering
during
2013.
The
Trust’s
capital
consists
of
debt,
including
mortgages,
convertible
debentures,
debentures,
subsidiary
redeemable
units
and
demand
revolving
credit
facilities,
and
unitholders’
equity.
The
Trust’s
objectives
in
managing
capital
are
to
ensure
adequate
operating
funds
are
available
to
maintain
consistent
and
sustainable
unitholder
distributions,
to
fund
leasing
costs
and
capital
expenditure
requirements,
and
to
provide
for
resources
needed
to
acquire
new
properties.
The
Trust’s
maximum
credit
exposure
is
equal
to
the
trade
receivables
at
December
31,
2014.
Various
debt,
equity
and
earnings
distribution
ratios
are
used
to
ensure
capital
adequacy
and
monitor
capital
requirements.
The
primary
ratios
used
for
assessing
capital
management
are
the
interest
coverage
ratio
and
net
debt-‐to-‐gross
carrying
value.
Other
significant
indicators
include
weighted
average
interest
rate,
average
term
to
maturity
of
debt
and
variable
debt
as
a
portion
of
total
debt.
These
indicators
assist
the
Trust
in
assessing
that
the
debt
level
maintained
is
sufficient
to
provide
adequate
cash
flows
for
unitholder
distributions
and
capital
expenditures,
and
for
evaluating
the
need
to
raise
funds
for
further
expansion.
Various
mortgages
have
debt
covenant
requirements
that
are
monitored
by
the
Trust
to
ensure
there
are
no
defaults.
These
covenants
include
loan-‐to-‐value
ratios,
cash
flow
coverage
ratios,
interest
coverage
ratios
and
debt
service
coverage
ratios.
These
covenants
are
measured
at
the
subsidiary
limited
partnership
level,
and
all
have
been
complied
with
in
all
material
respects.
The
Trust’s
equity
consists
of
Units,
in
which
the
carrying
value
is
impacted
by
earnings
and
unitholder
distributions.
The
Trust
endeavours
to
make
annual
distributions
of
$2.24
per
unit.
Amounts
retained
in
excess
of
the
distributions
are
used
to
fund
leasing
costs,
capital
expenditures
and
working
capital
requirements.
Management
monitors
distributions
through
various
ratios
to
ensure
adequate
resources
are
available.
These
ratios
include
the
proportion
of
distributions
paid
in
cash,
DRIP
participation
ratio,
and
total
distributions
as
a
percent
of
distributable
income
and
distributable
income
per
unit.
During
the
year,
there
were
no
events
of
default
on
any
of
the
Trust’s
obligations
under
its
credit
facilities
or
mortgage
loans.
Note
30
FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS
Risk
management
IFRS
7,
“Presentation
of
Financial
Statements”
(“IFRS
7”),
places
emphasis
on
disclosures
about
the
nature
and
extent
of
risks
arising
from
financial
instruments
and
how
the
Trust
manages
those
risks,
including
market,
credit
and
liquidity
risks.
Market
risk
is
the
risk
the
fair
value
or
future
cash
flows
of
a
financial
instrument
will
fluctuate
because
of
changes
in
market
prices.
Market
risk
consists
of
interest
rate
risk,
currency
risk
and
other
market
price
risk.
The
Trust
has
some
exposure
to
interest
rate
risk
primarily
as
a
result
of
its
variable
rate
debt.
In
addition,
there
is
interest
rate
risk
associated
with
the
Trust’s
fixed
rate
debt
due
to
the
expected
requirement
to
refinance
such
debts
in
the
year
of
maturity.
The
Trust
is
exposed
to
the
variability
in
market
interest
rates
on
maturing
debt
to
be
renewed.
Variable
rate
debt
at
December
31,
2014
was
8.9%
of
the
Trust’s
total
debt
(December
31,
2013
—
10.1%).
Included
in
fixed
rate
debt
is
the
term
loan
facility
of
$183,453,
which
has
a
variable
rate
of
interest
at
bankers’
acceptances
plus
1.85%
payable
monthly.
The
Trust
had
entered
into
two
interest
rate
swap
agreements,
one
for
three
years
at
3.03%
for
a
notional
value
of
$53,670
and
one
for
five
years
at
3.52%
for
a
notional
value
of
$129,783,
fixing
the
rate
of
interest
at
3.38%.
On
August
15,
2014,
the
three-‐year
interest
rate
swap
on
the
notional
balance
of
$53,670
expired
and
was
not
subsequently
renewed.
In
order
to
manage
exposure
to
interest
rate
risk,
the
Trust
endeavours
to
maintain
an
appropriate
mix
of
fixed
and
variable
rate
debt,
manage
maturities
of
fixed
rate
debt
and
match
the
nature
of
the
debt
with
the
cash
flow
characteristics
of
the
underlying
asset.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
127
The
following
interest
rate
sensitivity
table
outlines
the
potential
impact
of
a
1%
change
in
the
interest
rate
on
variable
rate
financial
assets
and
liabilities
for
the
prospective
12-‐month
period.
A
1%
change
is
considered
a
reasonable
level
of
fluctuation
on
variable
rate
financial
assets
and
liabilities.
Amount
Income
-‐1%
Equity
Income
Interest
rate
risk
+1%
Equity
$
10,920
$
(109)
$
(109)
$
109
$
109
Financial
assets
Cash
and
cash
equivalents(1)
Financial
liabilities
Fixed
rate
debt
due
to
mature
in
2015
and
total
variable
debt
$
(1)
Cash
and
cash
equivalents
are
short-‐term
investments
with
an
original
maturity
of
three
months
or
less,
and
exclude
cash
subject
to
restrictions
that
prevent
the
Trustʼs
use
for
current
purposes.
These
balances
generally
receive
interest
income
at
the
bankʼs
prime
rate
less
1.85%.
Cash
and
cash
equivalents
are
short
term
in
nature
and
the
current
balance
may
not
be
representative
of
the
balance
for
the
rest
of
the
year.
$
518,190
(5,182)
(5,182)
5,182
$
$
$
5,182
The
Trust
is
not
exposed
to
significant
foreign
exchange
risks.
The
Trust’s
assets
consist
of
office
properties.
Credit
risk
arises
from
the
possibility
that
tenants
in
investment
properties
may
not
fulfill
their
lease
or
contractual
obligations.
The
Trust
mitigates
its
credit
risks
by
attracting
tenants
of
sound
financial
standing
and
by
diversifying
its
mix
of
tenants.
It
also
monitors
tenant
payment
patterns
and
discusses
potential
tenant
issues
with
property
managers
on
a
regular
basis.
Cash
and
cash
equivalents,
deposits
and
restricted
cash
carry
minimal
credit
risk
as
all
funds
are
maintained
with
highly
reputable
financial
institutions.
Liquidity
risk
is
the
risk
the
Trust
will
encounter
difficulty
in
meeting
obligations
associated
with
the
maturity
of
financial
obligations.
The
Trust
manages
maturities
of
the
fixed
rate
debts,
and
monitors
the
repayment
dates
to
ensure
sufficient
capital
will
be
available
to
cover
obligations
as
they
become
due.
Derivatives
and
hedging
activities
The
Trust
uses
interest
rate
swaps
to
manage
its
cash
flow
associated
with
changes
in
interest
rates
on
variable
rate
debt.
As
at
December
31,
2014,
the
Trust
had
the
following
interest
rate
swaps
outstanding
(December
31,
2013
–
$183,453):
Hedging
item
Interest
rate
swap
Notional
$
129,783
Rate
(%)
Maturity
Fair
value
Hedged
item
3.52
August
15,
2016
$
592
Interest
payments
on
forecasted
issuance
of
bankersʼ
acceptances
The
maximum
term
over
which
interest
rate
hedging
gains
and
losses
reflected
in
other
comprehensive
income
will
be
recognized
is
five
years
as
the
hedged
interest
payments
occur.
Note
31
FAIR
VALUE
MEASUREMENTS
Quoted
market
prices
represent
a
Level
1
valuation.
When
quoted
market
prices
are
not
available,
the
Trust
maximizes
the
use
of
observable
inputs.
When
all
significant
inputs
are
observable,
the
valuation
is
classified
as
Level
2.
Valuations
that
require
the
significant
use
of
unobservable
inputs
are
considered
Level
3.
The
Trust’s
policy
is
to
recognize
transfers
into
and
transfers
out
of
fair
value
hierarchy
levels
as
of
the
date
of
the
event
or
change
in
circumstances
that
caused
the
transfer.
There
were
no
transfers
between
Levels
1,
2
and
3
during
the
year.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
128
The
following
tables
summarize
fair
value
measurements
recognized
in
the
consolidated
financial
statements
by
class
of
asset
or
liability
and
categorized
by
level
according
to
the
significance
of
the
inputs
used
in
making
the
measurements.
Carrying
value
as
at
Fair
value
as
at
December
31,
2014
Note
December
31,
2014
Level
1
Level
2
Level
3
Recurring
measurements
Non-‐financial
assets
Investment
properties
Financial
liabilities
(assets)
Interest
rate
swap
Conversion
feature
on
the
convertible
debentures
8
13
13
$
$
$
6,139,070
$
-‐
$
-‐
$
6,139,070
592
(760)
$
$
-‐
-‐
$
$
592
(760)
$
$
-‐
-‐
Recurring
measurements
Non-‐financial
assets
Investment
properties
Financial
liabilities
(assets)
Interest
rate
swaps
Conversion
feature
on
the
convertible
debentures
Carrying
value
as
at
Fair
value
as
at
December
31,
2013
Note
December
31,
2013
Level
1
Level
2
Level
3
8
$
6,241,685
$
-‐
$
-‐
$
6,241,685
13
$
13
$
336
$
(317)
$
-‐
-‐
$
$
336
$
(317)
$
-‐
-‐
Financial
instruments
carried
at
amortized
cost
where
the
carrying
value
does
not
approximate
fair
value
are
noted
below:
Fair
values
disclosed
Mortgages
Term
loan
facility
Convertible
debentures
Debentures
Investment
in
Dream
Industrial
REIT
Fair
values
disclosed
Mortgages
Term
loan
facility
Convertible
debentures
Debentures
Investment
in
Dream
Industrial
REIT
Carrying
value
as
at
Fair
value
as
at
December
31,
2014
Note
December
31,
2014
Level
1
Level
2
Level
3
$
13
13
13
13
9
$
2,380,708
$
182,260
51,160
482,700
191,691
-‐
$
-‐
51,641
485,200
-‐
-‐
$
-‐
-‐
-‐
156,206
2,282,145
186,069
-‐
-‐
-‐
Carrying
value
as
at
December
31,
2013
Fair
value
as
at
December
31,
2013
Level
1
Level
2
Level
3
2,477,183
$
181,530
51,885
333,647
166,317
-‐
$
-‐
52,718
335,311
-‐
-‐
$
2,507,543
184,635
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
144,096
Amounts
receivable,
cash
and
cash
equivalents,
subsidiary
redeemable
units,
tenant
security
deposits,
the
Deferred
Unit
Incentive
Plan,
amounts
payable
and
accrued
liabilities,
and
distributions
payable
are
carried
at
amortized
cost
which
approximates
fair
value
due
to
their
short-‐term
nature.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
129
Investment
properties
The
Trust’s
accounting
policy
as
indicated
in
Note
3
is
applied
to
fair
value
investment
properties
using
the
income
approach,
which
is
derived
from
two
methods:
overall
capitalization
rate
method
and
discounted
cash
flow
method,
which
result
in
these
measurements
being
classified
as
Level
3
in
the
fair
value
hierarchy.
Valuations
of
investment
properties
are
most
sensitive
to
changes
in
discount
rates
and
capitalization
rates.
In
applying
the
overall
capitalization
rate
method
the
stabilized
net
operating
income
(“stabilized
NOI”)
of
each
property
is
divided
by
any
appropriate
capitalization
rate
(“cap
rate”).
The
key
assumptions
in
the
valuation
of
investment
properties
are
as
follows:
•
•
Cap
rate
–
based
on
actual
location,
size
and
quality
of
the
properties
and
taking
into
account
any
available
market
data
at
the
valuation
date.
Stabilized
NOI
–
revenues
less
property
operating
expenses
adjusted
for
items
such
as
average
lease-‐up
costs,
long-‐term
vacancy
rates,
non-‐recoverable
capital
expenditures,
management
fees,
straight-‐line
rents
and
other
non-‐recurring
items.
• Discount
rate
–
reflecting
current
market
assessments
of
the
uncertainty
in
the
amount
and
timing
of
cash
flows.
•
•
Terminal
rate
–
taking
into
account
assumptions
regarding
vacancy
rates
and
market
rents.
Cash
flows
–
based
on
the
actual
location,
type
and
quality
of
the
properties
and
supported
by
the
terms
of
any
existing
lease,
other
contracts
or
external
evidence
such
as
current
market
rents
for
similar
properties.
In
accordance
with
IFRS
5,
“Non-‐current
assets
held
for
sale
and
discontinued
operations”,
the
Trust
classified
its
investment
in
joint
venture
totalling
$2,968
as
assets
held
for
sale.
The
fair
value
of
the
assets
held
for
sale
approximates
the
carrying
value
of
the
net
assets.
Investment
properties
are
valued
on
a
highest-‐and-‐best-‐use
basis.
For
all
of
the
Trust’s
investment
properties
the
current
use
is
considered
the
highest
and
best
use.
Investment
properties
valuation
process
The
Trust
is
responsible
for
determining
the
fair
value
measurements
included
in
the
consolidated
financial
statements.
The
Trust
includes
a
valuations
team
that
prepares
a
valuation
of
each
investment
property
every
quarter.
The
valuations
team
is
headed
by
an
experienced
valuator.
On
a
quarterly
basis,
the
Trust
engages
independent
professionally
qualified
valuators
who
hold
a
recognized
relevant
professional
qualification
and
have
recent
experience
in
the
locations
and
categories
of
the
investment
properties
to
complete
valuations
of
selected
properties.
The
Trust’s
objective
is
to
have
each
property
valued
by
an
independent
valuator
at
least
once
every
three
years.
For
properties
subject
to
an
independent
valuation
report,
the
valuations
team
verifies
all
major
inputs
to
the
valuation
and
reviews
the
results
with
the
independent
valuators.
The
valuations
team
reports
directly
to
the
Chief
Financial
Officer
(“CFO”)
and
the
Chief
Operating
Officer
(“COO”)
of
the
Trust.
Discussion
of
valuation
processes,
key
inputs
and
results
are
held
between
the
CFO,
COO
and
the
valuations
team
at
least
once
every
quarter,
in
line
with
the
Trust’s
quarterly
reporting
rules.
Changes
in
Level
3
fair
values
are
analyzed
at
each
reporting
date
during
the
quarterly
valuation
discussions
between
the
CFO,
COO
and
the
valuations
team.
Convertible
debentures
and
interest
rate
swaps
The
convertible
debentures
have
two
components
of
value
–
a
conventional
bond
and
a
call
on
the
equity
of
the
Trust
through
conversion.
Based
on
its
terms
(see
Note
13)
the
conversion
feature
is
an
embedded
derivative
and
has
been
separated
from
the
host
contract
and
classified
as
a
financial
liability
or
asset
through
profit
and
loss.
The
fair
value
of
the
conversion
feature,
categorized
in
Level
2,
is
calculated
based
on
the
paper
by
K.
Tsiveriotis
and
C.
Fernandes.
In
this
model,
a
convertible
bond
consists
of
two
components,
an
equity
component
and
a
debt
component,
and
these
components
have
different
default
risks.
The
equity
component
is
discounted
at
the
risk-‐free
rate.
The
equity
component
has
no
default
risk
since
the
Trust
can
always
issue
its
own
units.
The
debt
component
is
discounted
at
the
risk-‐free
rate
plus
a
credit
spread.
The
fair
value
of
the
conversion
feature
on
the
convertible
debentures
was
determined
using
critical
inputs,
some
of
which
are
not
directly
observable
based
on
market
data.
The
critical
inputs
are
the
unit
price
and
the
units’
distribution
yield,
the
underlying
unit
volatility,
the
risk-‐free
rate
and
the
assumed
credit
spread.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
130
A
qualified
independent
consultant
calculates
the
fair
value
measurement
for
the
financial
liability
classified
as
Level
2.
The
valuation
processes
and
results
are
determined
and
reviewed
by
senior
management.
The
inputs
and
processes
used
in
the
valuation
and
the
results
thereof
are
reviewed
by
senior
management
and
discussed
with
the
qualified
independent
consultant
to
ensure
conformity
with
IFRS.
The
significant
observable
inputs
used
in
the
fair
value
measurement
of
the
conversion
feature
as
at
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013
are
the
following:
• Volatility:
Historical
volatility
as
at
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013
was
derived
from
the
historical
prices
of
the
Trust
with
maturity
equal
to
the
term
to
maturity
of
the
convertible
debentures.
•
Credit
spread:
The
credit
spread
of
the
convertible
debentures
was
imputed
from
the
traded
price
of
the
convertible
debentures
as
at
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013.
5.5%
Series
H
Debentures
Credit
spread
Volatility
2014
2.39%
13.6%
December
31,
2013
2.54%
14.2%
A
higher
volatility
will
increase
the
value
of
the
conversion
option.
A
lower
credit
spread
will
decrease
the
value
of
the
conversion
option.
The
following
table
shows
the
changes
in
fair
value
of
the
conversion
option
from
a
5%
increase
or
decrease
in
volatility
and
a
100
bps
increase
or
decrease
in
credit
spread,
holding
all
other
inputs
constant.
Increase
(decrease)
in
fair
value
as
at
December
31,
2014
$
Increase
(decrease)
in
fair
value
as
at
December
31,
2013
$
Impact
of
change
to
volatility
-‐5%
3
+5%
(44)
$
Impact
of
change
to
volatility
-‐5%
(229)
+5%
542
$
Impact
of
change
to
credit
spread
+100
bps
461
$
-‐100
bps
(481)
Impact
of
change
to
credit
spread
+100
bps
481
$
-‐100
bps
(510)
$
$
The
Trust
also
uses
the
following
techniques
in
determining
the
fair
value
disclosed
for
the
following
financial
liabilities
classified
as
Level
1,
2
and
3:
Mortgages
and
term
loan
facility
The
fair
value
of
mortgages
and
term
loan
facility
as
at
December
31,
2014
is
determined
by
discounting
the
expected
cash
flows
of
each
mortgage
and
term
loan
facility
using
spreads
ranging
from
1.60%
to
1.70%
(December
31,
2013
–
1.85%
to
2.00%).
The
spreads
are
determined
using
the
Government
of
Canada
benchmark
bond
yield
for
instruments
of
similar
maturity
adjusted
for
the
Trust’s
specific
credit
risk.
In
determining
the
adjustment
for
credit
risk,
the
Trust
considers
market
conditions,
the
value
of
the
properties
that
the
mortgage
is
secured
by
and
other
indicators
of
the
Trust’s
creditworthiness.
Convertible
debentures
The
fair
value
of
convertible
debentures
as
at
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013
is
based
on
the
convertible
debentures’
trading
price
on
or
about
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013,
respectively.
Debentures
The
fair
value
of
debentures
that
are
traded
as
at
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013,
is
based
on
the
debentures’
trading
price
on
or
about
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013,
respectively.
The
fair
values
of
debentures
that
are
non-‐
trading
as
at
December
31,
2013
are
based
on
the
debentures’
par
value.
Demand
revolving
credit
facilities
The
fair
value
of
the
demand
revolving
credit
facilities
as
at
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013
approximates
their
carrying
value
due
to
their
short-‐term
nature.
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
131
Note
32
NET
GAINS
(LOSSES)
ON
TRANSACTIONS
AND
OTHER
ACTIVITIES
Debt
settlement
costs
Net
loss
on
sale
of
investment
properties
Internal
leasing
costs
Business
transformation
costs
Total
Note
20
25
Year
ended
December
31,
$
2014
(1,892)
(738)
(6,118)
(1,100)
(9,848)
$
2013
(241)
(283)
(6,468)
-‐
(6,992)
$
$
Debt
settlement
costs
related
to
the
discharge
of
mortgages
prior
to
the
original
maturity
dates
during
the
year
and
write-‐off
of
associated
fair
value
adjustments
and
financing
costs.
Net
loss
on
sale
of
investment
properties
for
the
year
related
to
the
write-‐off
of
financing
costs,
fair
value
adjustments
associated
with
the
debt
discharged
and
transaction
costs
associated
with
the
cash-‐generating
unit.
Effective
January
1,
2014,
the
Trust
adopted
a
new
accounting
policy,
which
was
applied
retrospectively,
to
recognize
internal
leasing
costs
as
an
expense
when
incurred
(see
Note
5).
Business
transformation
costs
related
to
process
and
technology
improvement
costs
incurred
pursuant
to
the
Shared
Services
and
Cost
Sharing
Agreement
(see
Note
25).
Dream
Office
REIT
2014
Annual
Report
|
132
Trustees
Detlef Bierbaum 1, 2
Köln, Germany
Corporate Director
Donald K. Charter 1, 3
Toronto, Ontario
Corporate Director
Michael J. Cooper 2
Toronto, Ontario
Chief Executive Officer
Dream Unlimited Corp.
Peter A. Crossgrove 1
Toronto, Ontario
Corporate Director
Joanne Ferstman 2, 4
Toronto, Ontario
Corporate Director
Robert G. Goodall 3
Mississauga, Ontario
President
Canadian Mortgage Capital Corporation
Duncan Jackman 1, 3
Toronto, Ontario
Chairman, President and CEO
E-L Financial Corporation Limited
1 Member of the Audit Committee
2 Member of the Investment Committee
3
Member of the Governance, Compensation
and Environmental Committee
4 Chair of the Board of Trustees
Corporate Information
HEAD OFFICE
Dream Office Real Estate
Investment Trust
State Street Financial Centre
30 Adelaide Street East, Suite 1600
Toronto, Ontario M5C 3H1
Phone: (416) 365-3535
Fax: (416) 365-6565
TRANSFER AGENT
(for change of address, registration
or other unitholder enquiries)
Computershare Trust
Company of Canada
100 University Avenue, 9th Floor
Toronto, Ontario M5J 2Y1
Phone: (514) 982-7555 or
1 800 564-6253
Fax: (416) 263-9394 or
1 888 453-0330
E-mail: service@computershare.com
AUDITORS
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PwC Tower, 18 York Street, Suite 2600
Toronto, Ontario M5J 0B2
CORPORATE COUNSEL
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
Box 50, 1 First Canadian Place, Suite 6100
Toronto, Ontario M5X 1B8
INVESTOR RELATIONS
Phone: (416) 365-3538
Toll free: 1 877 365-3535
E-mail: officeinfo@dream.ca
Website: www.dreamofficereit.ca
TAXATION OF DISTRIBUTIONS
Distributions paid to unitholders in respect
of the tax year ending December 31, 2014,
are taxed as follows:
Other income: 21.9%
Capital gains: 5.6%
Return of capital: 72.5%
STOCK EXCHANGE LISTING
The Toronto Stock Exchange
Listing symbols:
REIT Units, Series A: D.UN
5.5% Series H Convertible Debentures:
D.DB.H
5.95% Senior Unsecured Debentures,
Series K: D.DB.K
ANNUAL MEETING
OF UNITHOLDERS
Thursday, May 7, 2015 at 4:00 pm (EST)
Corporate office of Dream Office REIT
30 Adelaide Street East, Suite 300
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
DISTRIBUTION REINVESTMENT AND
UNIT PURCHASE PLAN
The purpose of our Distribution Reinvestment
and Unit Purchase Plan (“DRIP”) is to
provide unitholders with a convenient way of
investing in additional units without incurring
transaction costs such as commissions, service
charges or brokerage fees. By participating in
the Plan, you may invest in additional units in
two ways:
Distribution reinvestment: Unitholders will
have cash distributions from Dream Office
REIT reinvested in additional units as and when
cash distributions are made. If you register
in the DRIP you will also receive a “bonus”
distribution of units equal to 4% of the amount
of your cash distribution reinvested pursuant
to the Plan. In other words, for every $1.00 of
cash distributions reinvested by you under the
Plan, $1.04 worth of units will be purchased.
Cash purchase: Unitholders may invest in
additional units by making cash purchases.
To enrol, contact:
Computershare Trust Company of Canada
100 University Avenue, 9th Floor
Toronto, Ontario M5J 2Y1
Attention: Dividend Reinvestment Services
Or call their Customer Contact Centre at
1 800 564-6253 (toll free)
or (514) 982-7555
m
o
c
.
n
g
i
s
e
d
s
k
r
o
w
w
w
w
.
.
d
t
L
s
n
o
i
t
a
c
i
n
u
m
m
o
C
n
g
i
s
e
D
s
k
r
o
W
e
h
T
:
n
g
i
s
e
D
D
R
E
A
M
O
F
F
I
C
E
R
E
I
T
2
0
1
4
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T
dream.ca/office