Douglas Dynamics—2011 Shareholder Letter
Dear Fellow Shareholders,
15MAR201110480038
As we look back on our first full fiscal year as a public company, I am proud of what we have
accomplished. Our financial results in 2011 were strong. We completed the transition of our ownership
structure via successful secondary offerings and added Ken Krueger to our Board as another quality
independent director. We fulfilled our promise to make paying down debt and issuing a dividend our
top priorities for cash usage. We began the year by paying a substantial special dividend. During the
third quarter, we announced an increase in our regular dividend for the second time since our IPO.
Based on our strong cash position at the end of the year, we voluntarily paid down $10.0 million in
debt in January 2012 with the intent of using the cash interest savings to help fund the increase in our
stated dividend. As we have indicated in the past, we believe we have ample cash on hand to support
our dividend objectives for at least the next 12 months in any snowfall environment.
Overall, 2011 was a tale of two snow seasons. In the first quarter of 2011, we saw sustained heavy
snowfall across many of our major markets. This drove record first quarter results for the company and
set us up for a strong pre-season order period. The first three quarters of the year produced strong
results and this momentum continued through November. However, as the fourth quarter progressed
and we experienced unusually warm weather and low snowfall, our distributors’ appetite for additional
orders began to wane as the holidays approached. Despite the lack of snow in the fourth quarter we
are pleased with our full year 2011 results, as equipment unit sales were up by double digit percentages
and sales of parts and accessories reached record levels.
We are also optimistic that the economy is showing signs of gradual improvement. On a macro
level, unemployment levels are stable and starting to improve. Specific to our market, we saw select
pickup truck sales continue to strengthen in late 2011 and so far in 2012. Though the low snowfall this
winter will likely lengthen the replacement cycle for equipment due to limited use this season, we also
expect the negative impact of this will be partially offset as pent-up demand continues to unwind in the
coming years. As we’ve previously stated, we believe a certain amount of pent-up demand likely exists
as plowers delayed purchases during the heart of the recession. We expect that demand to materialize
over a several year period rather than one particular quarter or season, and it appears that a portion of
it returned early in the fourth quarter. As that demand returns, our flexible, lean manufacturing plants
allow us to respond to our customers with world class service levels which continue to exceed 95%
perfect shipments where our orders are fulfilled on or before the required ship date, without error in
content, packaging or delivery.
Our commitment to lean manufacturing continues to yield positive results for our company and
our distributors. In the third quarter of 2011 we rolled out our new preassembly and packaging system,
or P&P, which has received positive feedback from our distributors. The initiative has four main tenets:
1. A greater portion of the plow is preassembled, which enables the distributor to greatly reduce
installation time and install more plows per day
2.
Factory preassembly significantly reduces the possibility of distributor installation errors, thus
enhancing product quality and reducing warranty costs
3. The new packaging is weatherproof, which allows our distributors to store more inventory
outdoors and make more efficient use of space
4. An enhanced electrical system enables fleet users to marry any fleet truck to virtually any of
our plow models, increasing flexibility and efficiency for fleet end users
The response from our distributors has been very encouraging and we have completed most of the
hard work surrounding the implementation. The success of our initiatives to improve the quality of our
products through operational innovation and the continued strong execution from our entire workforce
is paying off. We are now positioned as a leaner, more cost efficient organization able to respond
dynamically to customer needs, fluctuations in the economy, and unusual weather patterns. Despite this
success, I can assure you we will not rest on our laurels. We are committed to continually seek
opportunities to increase our productivity. I am exceedingly proud of our team, and I am very pleased
to report that, in 2011 we were again named among select Milwaukee-area employers to the Milwaukee
Journal Sentinel Top Workplaces list. We are focused on making Douglas Dynamics a great place to
work, and we believe the effects of our employees’ dedication and service to our customers are evident
in our performance.
As we look into 2012, it is clear we just experienced one of the mildest winters on record across
North America with low snowfall levels in many of our core markets. In light of this fact, we maintain
a strong focus on the factors that are within our control. With our high variable costs and low fixed
costs, we believe we have the flexibility to take the necessary steps to cut costs, delay spending and
position ourselves to manage through this environment as we have done many times in the past. We
are ever cognizant of the contours of our business cycle, and we diligently stride to manage the assets
of the business effectively to maximize earnings and cash flow at all points in the cycle.
In 2012 we expect to leverage our track record and flexible business model to continue to produce
solid results. We will continue to seek to lead the industry by producing innovative products that
increase the productivity and efficiency for end users—allowing them to plow more snow in less time.
In addition to keeping our customers and distributors satisfied through continued product
improvements, we seek to remain diligent stewards of capital on behalf of our shareholders. We have a
healthy cash position and have proactively paid down debt. We intend to continue to return cash to
shareholders via our robust dividend. We also will continue to proactively seek out strategic accretive
acquisitions that will help drive the evolution of our business. As we move into the next phase of our
business, we feel that we have the wind at our backs with an improving economy, motivated employees,
loyal customers and distributors, and a lean and efficient organization, which I expect will continue to
provide value for our shareholders.
Sincerely,
James Janik
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 30, 2012
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
(cid:1) Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011
(cid:2) Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
or
For the Transition period from
to
Commission File No. 001-34728
DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC.
15MAR201110480038
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
7777 N 73rd Street
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
(Address of principal executive offices)
134275891
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
53223
(Zip Code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (414) 354-2310
Title of each class
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $.01 Par Value
New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes (cid:2) No (cid:1).
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes (cid:2) No (cid:1).
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes (cid:1) No (cid:2).
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes (cid:1) No (cid:2).
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by
reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. (cid:2)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a
smaller reporting company. See definitions of ‘‘large accelerated filer,’’ ‘‘accelerated filer’’ and ‘‘smaller reporting company’’ in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer (cid:2)
Accelerated filer (cid:1)
Non-accelerated filer (cid:2)
(Do not check if a
smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company (cid:2)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes (cid:2) No (cid:1).
At June 30, 2011, the aggregate market value of the voting stock of the Registrant held by stockholders who were not
affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $291 million (based upon the closing price of Registrant’s Common Stock on the
New York Stock Exchange on such date). At March 13, 2012, the Registrant had outstanding an aggregate of 22,130,996 shares
of its Common Stock.
Portions of the Proxy Statement for the Registrant’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 2, 2012 are
incorporated into Parts II and III.
Documents Incorporated by Reference:
Table of Contents
PART I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 1.
Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 1A. Risk Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 2.
Legal Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 3.
Mine Safety Disclosures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 4.
PART II . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
We did not make any purchases of equity securities registered pursuant to
Item 6.
Item 7.
Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Selected Consolidated Financial Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 8.
Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Item 9.
Disclosures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 9B. Other Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PART III . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Executive Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 11.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Item 12.
3
3
10
19
19
19
19
20
20
22
22
23
43
43
43
43
44
45
45
45
Item 13.
Item 14.
45
Shareholder Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
45
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence . . . . . .
45
Principal Accounting Fees and Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
46
PART IV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
46
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
47
Signatures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
48
Exhibit Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-1
Item 15.
Forward Looking Statements
PART I
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains ‘‘forward-looking statements’’ made within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as ‘‘anticipate,’’ ‘‘believe,’’
‘‘intend,’’ ‘‘estimate,’’ ‘‘expect,’’ ‘‘continue,’’ ‘‘should,’’ ‘‘could,’’ ‘‘may,’’ ‘‘plan,’’ ‘‘project,’’ ‘‘predict,’’
‘‘will’’ and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. In addition,
statements covering our future sales or financial performance and our plans, performance and other
objectives, expectations or intentions are forward-looking statements, such as statements regarding our
liquidity, debt, planned capital expenditures, and adequacy of capital resources and reserves. Factors
that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in such forward-
looking statements include, but are not limited to:
(cid:127) Weather conditions, particularly lack of or reduced levels of snowfall;
(cid:127) A significant decline in economic conditions;
(cid:127) Our inability to maintain good relationships with our distributors;
(cid:127) Lack of available or favorable financing options for our end-users or distributors;
(cid:127) Increases in the price of steel or other materials necessary for the production of our products
that cannot be passed on to our distributors;
(cid:127) The inability of our suppliers to meet our volume or quality requirements;
(cid:127) Inaccuracies in our estimates of future demand for our products;
(cid:127) Our inability to protect or continue to build our intellectual property portfolio;
(cid:127) Our inability to develop new products or improve upon existing products in response to end-user
needs;
(cid:127) Our inability to compete effectively against competition;
(cid:127) The effects of laws and regulations and their interpretations on our business and financial
conditions;
(cid:127) Losses due to lawsuits arising out of personal injuries associated with our products; and
(cid:127) Factors that could impact dividend payments;
We undertake no obligation to revise the forward-looking statements included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K to reflect any future events or circumstances. Our actual results, performance or
achievements could differ materially from the results expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking
statements. Factors in addition to those listed above that could cause or contribute to such differences
are discussed in Item 1A, ‘‘Risk Factors’’ of the Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 1. Business
Overview
Douglas Dynamics, Inc. (the ‘‘Company,’’ ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ ‘‘our’’) is the North American leader in the
design, manufacture and sale of snow and ice control equipment for light trucks, which consists of
snowplows, sand and salt spreaders, and related parts and accessories. We sell our products under the
WESTERN(cid:3), FISHER(cid:3) and BLIZZARD(cid:3) brands which are among the most established and
recognized in the industry. We believe that in 2011 our share of the light truck snow and ice control
equipment market was greater than 50%. We operate as a single segment.
3
We offer the broadest and most complete product line of snowplows and sand and salt spreaders
for light trucks in the U.S. and Canadian markets. We also provide a full range of related parts and
accessories, which generates an ancillary revenue stream throughout the lifecycle of our snow and ice
control equipment. For the year ended December 31, 2011, 85% of our net sales were generated from
sales of snow and ice control equipment, and 15% of our net sales were generated from sales of parts
and accessories.
We sell our products through a distributor network primarily to professional snowplowers who are
contracted to remove snow and ice from commercial, municipal and residential areas. Over the last 50
years, we have engendered exceptional customer loyalty for our products because of our ability to
satisfy the stringent demands of our customers for a high degree of quality, reliability and service. As a
result, we believe our installed base is the largest in the industry with over 500,000 snowplows and sand
and salt spreaders in service. Because sales of snowplows and sand and salt spreaders are primarily
driven by the need of our core end-user base to replace worn existing equipment, we believe our
substantial installed base provides us with a high degree of predictable sales over any extended period
of time.
We believe we have the industry’s most extensive North American distributor network, which
primarily consists of over 720 truck equipment distributors who purchase directly from us and are
located throughout the snow belt regions in North America (primarily the Midwest, East and Northeast
regions of the United States as well as all provinces of Canada). We have longstanding relationships
with many of our distributors, with an average tenure of approximately 15 years. We continually seek to
grow and optimize our network by opportunistically adding high-quality, well-capitalized distributors in
select geographic areas and by cross-selling our industry-leading brands within our distribution network.
Beginning in 2005, we began to extend our reach to international markets, establishing distribution
relationships in Northern Europe and Asia, where we believe meaningful growth opportunities exist.
We believe we are the industry’s most operationally efficient manufacturer due to our vertical
integration, highly variable cost structure and intense focus on lean manufacturing. We continually seek
to use lean principles to reduce costs and increase the efficiency of our manufacturing operations. We
currently manufacture our products in two facilities that we own in Milwaukee, Wisconsin and
Rockland, Maine. Furthermore, our manufacturing efficiency allows us to deliver desired products
quickly to our customers during times of sudden and unpredictable snowfall events when our customers
need our products immediately.
On May 10, 2010, we completed our initial public offering (‘‘IPO’’). In connection with our IPO,
we listed our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange (‘‘NYSE’’) under the stock symbol
‘‘PLOW.’’ On May 20, 2011 and December 6, 2011, certain of our stockholders, including affiliates of
Aurora Capital Group and Ares Management, completed registered secondary offerings of 5,750,000
and 1,966,479 shares, respectively, of our common stock. We did not receive any proceeds from the sale
of common stock by the selling stockholders in the offerings.
Our Industry
The light truck snow and ice control equipment industry in North America consists predominantly
of domestic participants that manufacture their products in North America. The annual demand for
snow and ice control equipment is driven primarily by the replacement cycle of the existing installed
base, which is predominantly a function of the average life of a snowplow or spreader and is driven by
usage and maintenance practices of the end-user. We believe actively-used snowplows are typically
replaced, on average, every 7 to 8 years.
The primary factor influencing the replacement cycle for snow and ice control equipment is the
level, timing and location of snowfall. Sales of snow and ice control equipment in any given year and
region are most heavily influenced by local snowfall levels in the prior snow season. Heavy snowfall
4
during a given winter causes equipment usage to increase, resulting in greater wear and tear and
shortened life cycles, thereby creating a need for replacement equipment and additional parts and
accessories.
While snowfall levels vary within a given year and from year-to-year, snowfall, and the
corresponding replacement cycle of snow and ice control equipment, is relatively consistent over multi-
year periods. The following chart depicts aggregate annual and eight-year (based on the typical life of
our snowplows) rolling average of the aggregate snowfall levels in 66 cities in 26 snow belt states across
the Northeast, East, Midwest and Western United States where we monitor snowfall levels from 1980
to 2011. As the chart indicates, since 1982 aggregate snowfall levels in any given rolling eight-year
period have been fairly consistent, ranging from 2,742 to 3,419 inches.
Snowfall in Snowbelt States (inches)
(for October 1 through March 31)
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
-
'79
'81
'83
'85
'87
'89
'91
'93
'95
'97
'99
'01
'03
'05
'07
'09
'11
Annual Snowfall
8 - year average annual snowfall
28FEB201204095041
Note: The 8-year rolling average snowfall is not presented prior to 1982 for purposes of the calculation
due to lack of snowfall data prior to 1975. Snowfall data in this chart is not adjusted for snowfall
outside of the 66 cities in the 26 states reflected.
Source: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Weather Service.
The demand for snow and ice control equipment can also be influenced by general economic
conditions in the United States, as well as local economic conditions in the snow-belt regions in North
America. In stronger economic conditions, our end-users may choose to replace or upgrade existing
equipment before its useful life has ended, while in weak economic conditions, our end-users may seek
to extend the useful life of equipment, thereby increasing the sales of parts and accessories. However,
since snow and ice control management is a non-discretionary service necessary to ensure public safety
and continued personal and commercial mobility in populated areas that receive snowfall, end-users
cannot extend the useful life of snow and ice control equipment indefinitely and must replace
equipment that has become too worn, unsafe or unreliable, regardless of economic conditions. While
our parts and accessories yield slightly higher gross margins than our snow and ice control equipment,
they yield significantly lower revenue than equipment sales, which adversely affects our results of
operations. However, since snow and ice control management is a non-discretionary service necessary
to ensure public safety and continued personal and commercial mobility in populated areas that receive
snowfall, end-users cannot extend the useful life of snow and ice control equipment indefinitely and
5
must replace equipment that has become too worn, unsafe or unreliable, regardless of economic
conditions.
Sales of parts and accessories for 2010 and 2011, respectively, were approximately 21.9% and
51.2% higher than average annual parts and accessories sales over the preceding ten years, which
management believes is largely a result of the deferral of new equipment purchases due to the recent
economic downturn. Although sales of snow and ice control units increased in 2011 as compared to
2010, management believes that absent the recent economic downturn, equipment sales in 2010 and
2011 would have been considerably higher due to the high levels of snowfall during these years, as
equipment unit sales in 2010 and 2011 remained below the ten-year average, while snowfall levels for
snow seasons ending March 31, 2010 and 2011 were considerably above the ten-year average.
Management believes this deferral of new equipment purchases could result in an elevated multi-year
replacement cycle as the economy recovers.
Long-term growth in the overall snow and ice control equipment market also results from
geographic expansion of developed areas in the snow belt regions of North America, as well as
consumer demand for technological enhancements in snow and ice control equipment and related parts
and accessories that improves efficiency and reliability. Continued construction in the snow belt regions
in North America increases the aggregate area requiring snow and ice removal, thereby growing the
market for snow and ice control equipment. In addition, the development and sale of more reliable,
more efficient and more sophisticated products have contributed to an approximate 2% to 4% average
unit price increase in each of the past five years.
Our Competitive Strengths
We compete solely with other North American manufacturers who do not benefit from our
extensive distributor network, manufacturing efficiencies and depth and breadth of products. As the
market leader in snow and ice control equipment for light trucks, we enjoy a set of competitive
advantages versus smaller equipment providers, which allows us to generate robust cash flows in all
snowfall environments and to support continued investment in our products, distribution capabilities
and brand regardless of annual volume fluctuations. We believe these advantages are rooted in the
following competitive strengths and reinforces our industry leadership over time.
Exceptional Customer Loyalty and Brand Equity. Our brands enjoy exceptional customer loyalty and
brand equity in the snow and ice control equipment industry with both end-users and distributors,
which have been developed through over 50 years of superior innovation, productivity, reliability and
support, consistently delivered season after season. We believe past brand experience, rather than price,
is the key factor impacting snowplow purchasing decisions.
Broadest and Most Innovative Product Offering. We provide the industry’s broadest product offering
with a full range of snowplows, sand and salt spreaders and related parts and accessories. We believe
we maintain the industry’s largest and most advanced in-house new product development program,
historically introducing several new and redesigned products each year. Our broad product offering and
commitment to new product development is essential to maintaining and growing our leading market
share position as well as continuing to increase the profitability of our business.
Extensive North American Distributor Network. With over 720 direct distributors, we benefit from
having the most extensive North American direct distributor network in the industry, providing a
significant competitive advantage over our peers. Our distributors function not only as sales and
support agents (providing access to parts and service), but also as industry partners providing real-time
end-user information, such as retail inventory levels, changing consumer preferences or desired
functionality enhancements, which we use as the basis for our product development efforts.
6
Leader in Operational Efficiency. We believe we are a leader in operational efficiency in our
industry, resulting from our application of lean manufacturing principles and a highly variable cost
structure. By utilizing lean principles, we are able to adjust production levels easily to meet fluctuating
demand, while controlling costs in slower periods. This operational efficiency is supplemented by our
highly variable cost structure, driven in part by our access to a sizable temporary workforce (comprising
approximately 10-15% of our total workforce), which we can quickly adjust, as needed. These
manufacturing efficiencies enable us to respond rapidly to urgent customer demand during times of
sudden and unpredictable snowfalls, allowing us to provide exceptional service to our existing customer
base and capture new customers from competitors that we believe cannot service their customers’ needs
with the same speed and reliability.
Strong Cash Flow Generation. We are able to generate significant cash flow as a result of relatively
consistent high profitability, low capital spending requirements and predictable timing of our working
capital requirements. Our cash flow results will also benefit substantially from approximately $18
million of annual tax-deductible intangible and goodwill expense over the next eight years, which has
the impact of reducing our corporate taxes owed by approximately $6.7 million on an annual basis
during this period, in the event we have sufficient taxable income to utilize such benefit. Our significant
cash flow has allowed us to reinvest in our business, pay down long term debt, and pay substantial
dividends on a pro rata basis to our stockholders.
Experienced Management Team. We believe our business benefits from an exceptional management
team that is responsible for establishing our leadership in the snow and ice control equipment industry
for light trucks. Our senior management team, consisting of four officers, has an average of
approximately 20 years of weather-related industry experience and an average of over eleven years with
our company. James Janik, our President and Chief Executive Officer, has been with us for over 19
years and in his current role since 2000, and through his strategic vision, we have been able to expand
our distributor network and grow our market leading position.
Our Business Strategy
Our business strategy is to capitalize on our competitive strengths to maximize cash flow to pay
dividends, reduce indebtedness and reinvest in our business to create stockholder value. The building
blocks of our strategy are:
Continuous Product Innovation. We believe new product innovation is critical to maintaining and
growing our market-leading position in the snow and ice control equipment industry. We will continue
to focus on developing innovative solutions to increase productivity, ease of use, reliability, durability
and serviceability of our products and on incorporating lean manufacturing concepts into our product
development process, which has allowed us to reduce the overall cost of development and, more
importantly, to reduce our time-to-market by nearly one-half.
Distributor Network Optimization. We will continually seek opportunities to continue to expand our
extensive distribution network by adding high-quality, well-capitalized distributors in select geographic
areas and by cross-selling our industry-leading brands within our distribution network to ensure we
maximize our ability to generate revenue while protecting our industry leading reputation, customer
loyalty and brands. We will also focus on optimizing this network by providing in-depth training,
valuable distributor support and attractive promotional and incentive opportunities. As a result of these
efforts, we believe a majority of our distributors choose to sell our products exclusively. We believe this
sizable high quality network is unique in the industry, providing us with valuable insight into purchasing
trends and customer preferences, and would be very difficult to replicate.
Aggressive Asset Management and Profit Focus. We will continue to aggressively manage our assets
in order to maximize our cash flow generation despite seasonal and annual variability in snowfall levels.
7
We believe our ability is unique in our industry and enables us to achieve attractive margins in all
snowfall environments. Key elements of our asset management and profit focus strategies include:
(cid:127) employment of a highly variable cost structure, which allows us to quickly adjust costs in
response to real-time changes in demand;
(cid:127) use of enterprise-wide lean principles, which allow us to easily adjust production levels up or
down to meet demand;
(cid:127) implementation of a pre-season order program, which incentivizes distributors to place orders
prior to the retail selling season and thereby enables us to more efficiently utilize our assets; and
(cid:127) development of a vertically integrated business model, which we believe provides us cost
advantages over our competition.
Additionally, although modest, our capital expenditure requirements and operating expenses can
be temporarily reduced in response to anticipated or actual lower sales in a particular year to maximize
cash flow.
Flexible, Lean Enterprise Platform. We will continue to utilize lean principles to maximize the
flexibility, efficiency and productivity of our manufacturing operations while reducing the associated
costs, enabling us to increase distributor and end-user satisfaction. For example, in an environment
where shorter lead times and near-perfect order fulfillment are important to our distributors, we
believe our lean processes have helped us to improve our shipping performance and build a reputation
for providing industry leading shipping performance.
Our Growth Opportunities
Increase Our Industry Leading Market Share. We plan to leverage our industry leading position,
distribution network and new product innovation capabilities to capture market share in the North
American snow and ice control equipment market, focusing our primary efforts on increasing
penetration in those North American markets where we believe our overall market share is less than
50%. We also plan to continue growing our presence in the snow and ice control equipment market
outside of North America, particularly in Asia and Europe, which we believe could provide significant
growth opportunities in the future.
Opportunistically Seek New Products and New Markets. We will consider external growth
opportunities within the snow and ice control industry and other equipment or component markets. We
plan to continue to evaluate acquisition opportunities within our industry that can help us expand our
distribution reach, enhance our technology and as a consequence improve the breadth and depth of our
product lines. We also consider diversification opportunities in adjacent markets that complement our
business model and could offer us the ability to leverage our core competencies to create stockholder
value.
Employees
As of December 31, 2011, we employed approximately 525 employees on a full-time basis. None of
our employees are represented by a union and we are not party to any collective bargaining
agreements.
8
Sales Programs
We offer a number of sales programs to our distributors to finance the purchase of our products.
One such program is our pre-season sales program, which not only benefits our distributors, but also
benefits us by helping us to manage the seasonality of our business. During the second and third
quarters, we offer our distributors the option of either (1) a purchase price discount, with the
percentage discount being highest the earlier in the season that the distributor purchases and pays for
our products, or (2) deferring payment until the fourth quarter. Under either option product shipment
occurs during the pre-season sales period. On average, approximately 60% to 65% of our annual
shipments occur during the pre-season sales period. Distributors who purchase our products during the
first or fourth quarter, on the other hand, must deliver payment to us within 30 days of shipment. Our
backlog as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 was $0.8 million and $0.7 million, respectively. We expect
that all backlog as of December 31, 2011 will be shipped in 2012.
We are also party to an accounts receivable securitization facility pursuant to which certain
distributors may elect to finance their purchases from us through a third party financing company.
Distributors who purchase our products through this financing arrangement are offered the same
pre-season sales incentives as distributors who purchase directly from us, the terms of which are
described above. In the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, 1.3%, 1.0% and 1.9%,
respectively of our net sales were financed by our distributors through a third party financing company.
Pursuant to the terms of this facility, we maintain the risk of collectability of the receivable under this
facility. If the third party financing company is unable to collect from the distributor the amounts due
in respect of the product financing, we are obligated to repurchase the outstanding receivable balance
plus any legal fees incurred by the financing company. Historically, repurchases of inventory and
uncollectible amounts related to receivables sold under this program have been less than $100 thousand
on average for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011.
In 2011, we also unveiled an end-user financing program. We have partnered with a third party
financing company which has agreed to extend credit to our-end users for purchases of our products,
subject to credit approval. Once approval is obtained, our end-users can then place an order directly
for our products with our distributors. This program is designed to facilitate our end-users’ access to
credit.
Intellectual Property
We maintain patents relating to snowplow mounts, assemblies, hydraulics, electronics and lighting
systems as well as sand and salt spreader assemblies and our patent applications relate to each of the
foregoing except for hydraulics and sand and salt spreader assemblies. When granted, each patent has a
17 year duration. The duration of the patents we currently possess range between one year and
17 years of remaining life. Our patent applications date from 2001 to 2011.
We rely on a combination of patents, trade secrets and trademarks to protect certain of the
proprietary aspects of our business and technology. We hold approximately 20 U.S. registered
trademarks (including the trademarks WESTERN(cid:3), FISHER(cid:3) and BLIZZARD(cid:3)), 5 Canadian
registered trademarks, 25 U.S. issued patents, 15 Canadian patents and two Chinese patents.
Other Information
We were formed as a Delaware corporation in 2004. We maintain a website with the address
www.douglasdynamics.com. We are not including the information contained on our website as part of,
or incorporating it by reference into, this report. We make available free of charge (other than an
investor’s own Internet access charges) through our website our Annual Report on Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to these reports, as
9
soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish such material
to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’).
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The Company operates in an environment that involves numerous known and unknown risks and
uncertainties. Our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely
affected by any of these risks, as well as other risks not currently known to us or that we currently consider
immaterial. The risk described below highlight some of the factors that have affected, and in the future could
affect our operations.
Our results of operations depend primarily on the level, timing and location of snowfall. As a result, a decline
in snowfall levels in multiple regions for an extended time could cause our results of operations to decline and
adversely affect our ability to pay dividends.
As a manufacturer of snow and ice control equipment for light trucks, and related parts and
accessories, our sales depend primarily on the level, timing and location of snowfall in the regions in
which we offer our products. A low level or lack of snowfall in any given year in any of the snow-belt
regions in North America (primarily the Midwest, East and Northeast regions of the United States as
well as all provinces of Canada) will likely cause sales of our products to decline in such year as well as
the subsequent year, which in turn may adversely affect our results of operations and ability to pay
dividends. See ‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations—Seasonality and Year-to-Year Variability.’’ A sustained period of reduced snowfall events
in one or more of the geographic regions in which we offer our products could cause our results of
operations to decline and adversely affect our ability to pay dividends.
The year-to-year variability of our business can cause our results of operations and financial condition to be
materially different from year-to-year; whereas the seasonality of our business can cause our results of
operations and financial condition to be materially different from quarter-to-quarter.
Because our business depends on the level, timing and location of snowfall, our results of
operations vary from year-to-year. Additionally, because the annual snow season typically only runs
from October 1 through March 31, our distributors typically purchase our products during the second
and third quarters. As a result, we operate in a seasonal business. We not only experience seasonality in
our sales, but also experience seasonality in our working capital needs. Consequently, our results of
operations and financial condition can vary from year-to-year, as well as from quarter-to-quarter, which
could affect our ability to pay dividends. If we are unable to effectively manage the seasonality and
year-to-year variability of our business, our results of operations, financial condition and ability to pay
dividends may suffer.
If economic conditions in the United States continue to remain weak or deteriorate further, our results of
operations, financial condition and ability to pay dividends may be adversely affected.
Historically, demand for snow and ice control equipment for light trucks has been influenced by
general economic conditions in the United States, as well as local economic conditions in the snow-belt
regions in North America. During the last few years, economic conditions throughout the United States
have been extremely weak, although they began to improve in 2011, they may not become strong in the
foreseeable future. Weakened economic conditions may cause our end-users to delay purchases of
replacement snow and ice control equipment and instead repair their existing equipment, leading to a
decrease in our sales of new equipment. Weakened economic conditions may also cause our end-users
to delay their purchases of new light trucks. Because our end-users tend to purchase new snow and ice
control equipment concurrent with their purchase of new light trucks, their delay in purchasing new
light trucks can also result in the deferral of their purchases of new snow and ice control equipment.
10
The deferral of new equipment purchases during periods of weak economic conditions may negatively
affect our results of operations, financial condition and ability to pay dividends.
Weakened economic conditions may also cause our end-users to consider price more carefully in
selecting new snow and ice control equipment. Historically, considerations of quality and service have
outweighed considerations of price, but in a weak economy, price may become a more important
factor. Any refocus away from quality in favor of cheaper equipment could cause end-users to shift
away from our products to less expensive competitor products, or to shift away from our more
profitable products to our less profitable products, which in turn would adversely affect our results of
operations and our ability to pay dividends.
Our failure to maintain good relationships with our distributors, the loss or consolidation of our distributor
base or the actions or inactions of our distributors could have an adverse effect on our results of operations
and our ability to pay dividends.
We depend on a network of truck equipment distributors to sell, install and service our products.
Nearly all of these sales and service relationships are at will, so almost all of our distributors could
discontinue the sale and service of our products at any time, and those distributors that primarily sell
our products may choose to sell competing products at any time. Further, difficult economic or other
circumstances could cause any of our distributors to discontinue their businesses. Moreover, if our
distributor base were to consolidate or if any of our distributors were to discontinue their business,
competition for the business of fewer distributors would intensify. If we do not maintain good
relationships with our distributors, or if we do not provide product offerings and pricing that meet the
needs of our distributors, we could lose a substantial amount of our distributor base. A loss of a
substantial portion of our distributor base could cause our sales to decline significantly, which would
have an adverse effect on our results of operations and ability to pay dividends.
In addition, our distributors may not provide timely or adequate service to our end-users. If this
occurs, our brand identity and reputation may be damaged, which would have an adverse effect on our
results of operations and ability to pay dividends.
Lack of available financing options for our end-users or distributors may adversely affect our sales volumes.
Our end-user base is highly concentrated among professional snowplowers, who comprise over
50% of our end-users, many of whom are individual landscapers who remove snow during the winter
and landscape during the rest of the year, rather than large, well-capitalized corporations. These
end-users often depend upon credit to purchase our products. If credit is unavailable on favorable
terms or at all, our end-users may not be able to purchase our products from our distributors, which
would in turn reduce sales and adversely affect our results of operations and ability to pay dividends.
In addition, because our distributors, like our end-users, rely on credit to purchase our products, if
our distributors are not able to obtain credit, or access credit on favorable terms, we may experience
delays in payment or nonpayment for delivered products. Further, if our distributors are unable to
obtain credit or access credit on favorable terms, they could experience financial difficulties or
bankruptcy and cease purchases of our products altogether. Thus, if financing is unavailable on
favorable terms or at all, our results of operations and ability to pay dividends would be adversely
affected.
The price of steel, a commodity necessary to manufacture our products, is highly variable. If the price of steel
increases, our gross margins could decline.
Steel is a significant raw material used to manufacture our products. During 2011, 2010 and 2009,
our steel purchases were approximately 15%, 13% and 18% of our revenue, respectively. The steel
industry is highly cyclical in nature, and steel prices have been volatile in recent years and may remain
11
volatile in the future. Steel prices are influenced by numerous factors beyond our control, including
general economic conditions domestically and internationally, the availability of raw materials,
competition, labor costs, freight and transportation costs, production costs, import duties and other
trade restrictions. Steel prices are volatile and may increase as a result of increased demand from the
automobile and consumer durable sectors. If the price of steel increases, our variable costs may
increase. We may not be able to mitigate these increased costs through the implementation of
permanent price increases or temporary invoice surcharges, especially if economic conditions remain
weak and our distributors and end-users become more price sensitive. If we are unable to successfully
mitigate such cost increases in the future, our gross margins could decline.
If petroleum prices increase, our results of operations could be adversely affected.
Petroleum prices have fluctuated significantly in recent years. Prices and availability of petroleum
products are subject to political, economic and market factors that are outside of our control. Political
events in petroleum-producing regions as well as hurricanes and other weather-related events may
cause the price of fuel to increase. If the price of fuel increases, the demand for our products may
decline, which would adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
We depend on outside suppliers who may be unable to meet our volume and quality requirements, and we may
be unable to obtain alternative sources.
We purchase certain components essential to our snowplows and sand and salt spreaders from
outside suppliers, including off-shore sources. Most of our key supply arrangements can be discontinued
at any time. A supplier may encounter delays in the production and delivery of such products and
components or may supply us with products and components that do not meet our quality, quantity or
cost requirements. Additionally, a supplier may be forced to discontinue operations. Any
discontinuation or interruption in the availability of quality products and components from one or more
of our suppliers may result in increased production costs, delays in the delivery of our products and lost
end-user sales, which could have an adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
We have continued to increase the number of our off-shore suppliers. Our increased reliance on
off-shore sourcing may cause our business to be more susceptible to the impact of natural disasters, war
and other factors that may disrupt the transportation systems or shipping lines used by our suppliers, a
weakening of the dollar over an extended period of time and other uncontrollable factors such as
changes in foreign regulation or economic conditions. In addition, reliance on off-shore suppliers may
make it more difficult for us to respond to sudden changes in demand because of the longer lead time
to obtain components from off-shore sources. We may be unable to mitigate this risk by stocking
sufficient materials to satisfy any sudden or prolonged surges in demand for our products. If we cannot
satisfy demand for our products in a timely manner, our sales could suffer as distributors can cancel
purchase orders without penalty until shipment.
We do not sell our products under long-term purchase contracts, and sales of our products are significantly
impacted by factors outside of our control; therefore, our ability to estimate demand is limited.
We do not enter into long-term purchase contracts with our distributors and the purchase orders
we receive may be cancelled without penalty until shipment. Therefore, our ability to accurately predict
future demand for our products is limited. Nonetheless, we attempt to estimate demand for our
products for purposes of planning our annual production levels and our long-term product development
and new product introductions. We base our estimates of demand on our own market assessment,
snowfall figures, quarterly field inventory surveys and regular communications with our distributors.
Because wide fluctuations in the level, timing and location of snowfall, economic conditions and other
factors may occur, each of which is out of our control, our estimates of demand may not be accurate.
Underestimating demand could result in procuring an insufficient amount of materials necessary for the
12
production of our products, which may result in increased production costs, delays in product delivery,
missed sale opportunities and a decrease in customer satisfaction. Overestimating demand could result
in the procurement of excessive supplies, which could result in increased inventory and associated
carrying costs.
If we are unable to enforce, maintain or continue to build our intellectual property portfolio, or if others
invalidate our intellectual property rights, our competitive position may be harmed.
Our patents relate to snowplow mounts, assemblies, hydraulics, electronics and lighting systems as
well as sand and salt spreader assemblies and our patent applications relate to each of the foregoing
except for hydraulics and sand and salt spreader assemblies. When granted, each patent has a 17 year
duration. The duration of the patents we currently possess range between one year and 17 years of
remaining life. Our patent applications date from 2001 through 2011.
We rely on a combination of patents, trade secrets and trademarks to protect certain of the
proprietary aspects of our business and technology. We hold approximately 20 U.S. registered
trademarks (including the trademarks WESTERN(cid:3), FISHER(cid:3) and BLIZZARD(cid:3)), 5 Canadian
registered trademarks, 25 U.S. issued patents, 15 Canadian patents and two Chinese patents. Although
we work diligently to protect our intellectual property rights, monitoring the unauthorized use of our
intellectual property is difficult, and the steps we have taken may not prevent unauthorized use by
others. In addition, in the event a third party challenges the validity of our intellectual property rights,
a court may determine that our intellectual property rights may not be valid or enforceable. An adverse
determination with respect to our intellectual property rights may harm our business prospects and
reputation. Third parties may design around our patents or may independently develop technology
similar to our trade secrets. The failure to adequately build, maintain and enforce our intellectual
property portfolio could impair the strength of our technology and our brands, and harm our
competitive position. Although we have no reason to believe that our intellectual property rights are
vulnerable, previously undiscovered intellectual property could be used to invalidate our rights.
If we are unable to develop new products or improve upon our existing products on a timely basis, it could
have an adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
We believe that our future success depends, in part, on our ability to develop on a timely basis
new technologically advanced products or improve upon our existing products in innovative ways that
meet or exceed our competitors’ product offerings. Continuous product innovation ensures that our
consumers have access to the latest products and features when they consider buying snow and ice
control equipment. Maintaining our market position will require us to continue to invest in research
and development and sales and marketing. Product development requires significant financial,
technological and other resources. We may be unsuccessful in making the technological advances
necessary to develop new products or improve our existing products to maintain our market position.
Industry standards, end-user expectations or other products may emerge that could render one or more
of our products less desirable or obsolete. If any of these events occur, it could cause decreases in
sales, a failure to realize premium pricing and an adverse effect on our business and financial
condition.
We face competition from other companies in our industry, and if we are unable to compete effectively with
these companies, it could have an adverse effect on our sales and profitability. Price competition among our
distributors could negatively affect our market share.
We primarily compete with regional manufacturers of snow and ice control equipment for light
trucks. While we are the most geographically diverse company in our industry, we may face increasing
competition in the markets in which we operate. In saturated markets, price competition may lead to a
decrease in our market share or a compression of our margins, both of which would affect our
13
profitability. Moreover, current or future competitors may grow their market share and develop
superior service and may have or may develop greater financial resources, lower costs, superior
technology or more favorable operating conditions than we maintain. As a result, competitive pressures
we face may cause price reductions for our products, which would affect our profitability or result in
decreased sales and operating income. Additionally, saturation of the markets in which we compete or
channel conflicts among our brands and shifts in consumer preferences may increase these competitive
pressures or may result in increased competition among our distributors and affect our sales and
profitability. In addition, price competition among the distributors that sell our products could lead to
significant margin erosion among our distributors, which could in turn result in compressed margins or
loss of market share for us. Management believes that, after ourselves, the next largest competitors in
the market for snow and ice control equipment for light trucks are Northern Star Industries, Inc. (the
manufacturer of the Boss brand of snow and ice control equipment) and Meyer Products LLC,
respectively, and accordingly represent our primary competitors for market share.
We are subject to complex laws and regulations, including environmental and safety regulations that can
adversely affect the cost, manner or feasibility of doing business.
Our operations are subject to certain federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to,
among other things, the generation, storage, handling, emission, transportation, disposal and discharge
of hazardous and non-hazardous substances and materials into the environment, the manufacturing of
motor vehicle accessories and employee health and safety. We cannot be certain that existing and
future laws and regulations and their interpretations will not harm our business or financial condition.
We currently make and may be required to make large and unanticipated capital expenditures to
comply with environmental and other regulations, such as:
(cid:127) Applicable motor vehicle safety standards established by the National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration;
(cid:127) Reclamation and remediation and other environmental protection; and
(cid:127) Standards for workplace safety established by the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration.
While we monitor our compliance with applicable laws and regulations and attempt to budget for
anticipated costs associated with compliance, we cannot predict the future cost of such compliance. In
2011, the amount expended for such compliance was insignificant, but we could incur material expenses
in the future in the event of future legislation changes or unforeseen events, such as a workplace
accident or environmental discharge, or if we otherwise discover we are in non-compliance with an
applicable regulation. In addition, under these laws and regulations, we could be liable for:
(cid:127) Product liability claims;
(cid:127) Personal injuries;
(cid:127) Investigation and remediation of environmental contamination and other governmental sanctions
such as fines and penalties; and
(cid:127) Other environmental damages.
Our operations could be significantly delayed or curtailed and our costs of operations could
significantly increase as a result of regulatory requirements, restrictions or claims. We are unable to
predict the ultimate cost of compliance with these requirements or their effect on our operations.
14
Financial market conditions have had a negative impact on the return on plan assets for our pension plans,
which may require additional funding and negatively impact our cash flows.
Our pension expense and required contributions to our pension plan are directly affected by the
value of plan assets, the projected rate of return on plan assets, the actual rate of return on plan assets
and the actuarial assumptions we use to measure the defined benefit pension plan obligations. Due to
the recent significant financial market downturn, the funded status of our pension plans has declined.
As of December 31, 2011, our pension plans were underfunded by approximately $14.2 million. In
2011, contributions to our defined benefit pension plans were approximately $1.9 million. If plan assets
continue to perform below expectations, future pension expense and funding obligations will increase,
which would have a negative impact on our cash flows. Moreover, under the Pension Protection Act of
2006, it is possible that continued losses of asset values may necessitate accelerated funding of our
pension plans in the future to meet minimum federal government requirements.
The statements regarding our industry, market positions and market share in this filing are based on our
management’s estimates and assumptions. While we believe such statements are reasonable, such statements
have not been independently verified.
Information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K concerning the snow and ice control
equipment industry for light trucks, our general expectations concerning this industry and our market
positions and other market share data regarding the industry are based on estimates our management
prepared using end-user surveys, anecdotal data from our distributors and distributors that carry our
competitors’ products, our results of operations and management’s past experience, and on assumptions
made, based on our management’s knowledge of this industry, all of which we believe to be reasonable.
These estimates and assumptions are inherently subject to uncertainties, especially given the
year-to-year variability of snowfall and the difficulty of obtaining precise information about our
competitors, and may prove to be inaccurate. In addition, we have not independently verified the
information from any third-party source and thus cannot guarantee its accuracy or completeness,
although management also believes such information to be reasonable. Our actual operating results
may vary significantly if our estimates and outlook concerning the industry, snowfall patterns, our
market positions or our market shares turn out to be incorrect.
We are subject to product liability claims, product quality issues, and other litigation from time to time that
could adversely affect our operating results or financial condition.
The manufacture, sale and usage of our products expose us to a risk of product liability claims. If
our products are defective or used incorrectly by our end-users, injury may result, giving rise to product
liability claims against us. If a product liability claim or series of claims is brought against us for
uninsured liabilities or in excess of our insurance coverage, and it is ultimately determined that we are
liable, our business and financial condition could suffer. Any losses that we may suffer from any
liability claims, and the effect that any product liability litigation may have upon the reputation and
marketability of our products, may divert management’s attention from other matters and may have a
negative impact on our business and operating results. Additionally, we could experience a material
design or manufacturing failure in our products, a quality system failure or other safety issues, or
heightened regulatory scrutiny that could warrant a recall of some of our products. A recall of some of
our products could also result in increased product liability claims. Any of these issues could also result
in loss of market share, reduced sales, and higher warranty expense.
We are heavily dependent on our Chief Executive Officer and management team.
Our continued success depends on the retention, recruitment and continued contributions of key
management, finance, sale and marketing personnel, some of whom could be difficult to replace. Our
success is largely dependent upon our senior management team, led by our Chief Executive Officer and
15
other key managers. The loss of any one or more of such persons could have an adverse effect on our
business and financial condition.
Our indebtedness could adversely affect our operations, including our ability to perform our obligations and
pay dividends.
As of December 31, 2011, we had approximately $123 million of senior secured indebtedness and
$70 million of borrowing availability under our revolving credit facility. We may also be able to incur
substantial indebtedness in the future, including senior indebtedness, which may or may not be secured.
Our indebtedness could have important consequences, including the following:
(cid:127) We could have difficulty satisfying our debt obligations, and if we fail to comply with these
requirements, an event of default could result;
(cid:127) We may be required to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to
required payments on indebtedness, thereby reducing the cash flow available to pay dividends or
fund working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate activities;
(cid:127) Covenants relating to our indebtedness may restrict our ability to make distributions to our
stockholders;
(cid:127) Covenants relating to our indebtedness may limit our ability to obtain additional financing for
working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate activities, which may limit our
flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we
operate;
(cid:127) We may be more vulnerable to general adverse economic and industry conditions;
(cid:127) We may be placed at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors with less debt;
and
(cid:127) We may have difficulty repaying or refinancing our obligations under our senior credit facilities
on their respective maturity dates.
If any of these consequences occur, our financial condition, results of operations and ability to pay
dividends could be adversely affected. This, in turn, could negatively affect the market price of our
common stock, and we may need to undertake alternative financing plans, such as refinancing or
restructuring our debt, selling assets, reducing or delaying capital investments or seeking to raise
additional capital. We cannot assure you that any refinancing would be possible, that any assets could
be sold, or, if sold, of the timing of the sales and the amount of proceeds that may be realized from
those sales, or that additional financing could be obtained on acceptable terms, if at all.
Our variable rate indebtedness subjects us to interest rate risk, which could cause our debt service obligations
to increase significantly and could impose adverse consequences.
Certain of our borrowings, including our term loan and any revolving borrowings under our senior
credit facilities, are at variable rates of interest and expose us to interest rate risk. In addition, the
interest rate on any revolving borrowings is subject to an increase in the interest rate if the average
daily availability under our revolving credit facility falls below a certain threshold. If interest rates
increase, our debt service obligations on the variable rate indebtedness would increase even though the
amount borrowed remained the same, and our net income and cash flows would correspondingly
decrease.
16
Our senior credit facilities impose restrictions on us, which may also prevent us from capitalizing on business
opportunities and taking certain corporate actions. One of these facilities also includes minimum availability
requirements, which if unsatisfied, could result in liquidity events that may jeopardize our business.
Our senior credit facilities contain, and future debt instruments to which we may become subject
may contain, covenants that limit our ability to engage in activities that could otherwise benefit our
company. Under the credit facilities as modified in April 2011, these covenants include restrictions on
our ability to:
(cid:127) incur, assume or permit to exist additional indebtedness or contingent obligations;
(cid:127) incur liens and engage in sale and leaseback transactions;
(cid:127) make loans and investments in excess of agreed upon amounts;
(cid:127) declare dividends, make payments or redeem or repurchase capital stock in excess of agreed
upon amounts and subject to certain other limitations;
(cid:127) engage in mergers, acquisitions and other business combinations;
(cid:127) prepay, redeem or purchase certain indebtedness or amend or alter the terms of our
indebtedness;
(cid:127) sell assets;
(cid:127) make further negative pledges;
(cid:127) create restrictions on distributions by subsidiaries;
(cid:127) change our fiscal year;
(cid:127) engage in activities other than, among other things, incurring the debt under our new senior
credit facilities and the activities related thereto, holding our ownership interest in DDI LLC,
making restricted payments, including dividends, permitted by our new senior credit facilities and
conducting activities related to our status as a public company;
(cid:127) amend or waive rights under certain agreements;
(cid:127) transact with affiliates or our stockholders; and
(cid:127) alter the business that we conduct.
Our amended revolving credit facility also includes limitations on capital expenditures and requires
that if we fail to maintain the greater of $8,750,000 and 12.5% of the revolving commitments in
borrowing availability, we must comply with a fixed charge coverage ratio test. In addition, if a liquidity
event occurs because our borrowing availability is less than the greater of $10,500,000 and 15% of the
aggregate revolving commitments (or an event of default occurs and is continuing), subject to certain
limited cure rights, all proceeds of our accounts receivable and other collateral will be applied to
reduce obligations under our amended revolving credit facility, jeopardizing our ability to meet other
obligations. Our ability to comply with the covenants contained in our senior credit facilities or in the
agreements governing our future indebtedness, and our ability to avoid liquidity events, may be affected
by events, or our future performance, which are subject to factors beyond our control, including
prevailing economic, financial, industry and weather conditions, such as the level, timing and location of
snowfall and general economic conditions in the snowbelt regions of North America. A failure to
comply with these covenants could result in a default under our senior credit facilities, which could
prevent us from paying dividends, borrowing additional amounts and using proceeds of our inventory
and accounts receivable, and also permit the lenders to accelerate the payment of such debt. If any of
our debt is accelerated or if a liquidity event (or event of default) occurs that results in collateral
proceeds being applied to reduce such debt, we may not have sufficient funds available to repay such
17
debt and our other obligations, in which case, our business could be halted and such lenders could
proceed against any collateral securing that debt. Further, if the lenders accelerate the payment of the
indebtedness under our senior credit facilities, our assets may not be sufficient to repay in full the
indebtedness under our senior credit facilities and our other indebtedness, if any. We cannot assure you
that these covenants will not adversely affect our ability to finance our future operations or capital
needs to pursue available business opportunities or react to changes in our business and the industry in
which we operate.
Provisions of Delaware law and our charter documents could delay or prevent an acquisition of us, even if the
acquisition would be beneficial to you.
Provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may have the effect of delaying or
preventing a change of control or changes in our management. These provisions include:
(cid:127) the absence of cumulative voting in the election of our directors, which means that the holders
of a majority of our common stock may elect all of the directors standing for election;
(cid:127) the ability of our Board of Directors to issue preferred stock with voting rights or with rights
senior to those of our common stock without any further vote or action by the holders of our
common stock;
(cid:127) the division of our Board of Directors into three separate classes serving staggered three-year
terms;
(cid:127) the ability of our stockholders to remove our directors is limited to cause and only by the vote
of at least 662⁄3% of the outstanding shares of our common stock;
(cid:127) the prohibition on our stockholders from acting by written consent and calling special meetings;
(cid:127) the requirement that our stockholders provide advance notice when nominating our directors or
proposing business to be considered by the stockholders at an annual meeting of stockholders;
and
(cid:127) the requirement that our stockholders must obtain a 662⁄3% vote to amend or repeal certain
provisions of our certificate of incorporation.
We are also subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which, subject to
certain exceptions, prohibits us from engaging in any business combination with any interested
stockholder, as defined in that section, for a period of three years following the date on which that
stockholder became an interested stockholder. This provision, together with the provisions discussed
above, could also make it more difficult for you and our other stockholders to elect directors and take
other corporate actions, and could limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future
for shares of our common stock.
Our dividend policy may limit our ability to pursue growth opportunities.
If we continue to pay dividends at the level contemplated by our dividend policy, as in effect on
the date of this filing, or if we increase the level of our dividend payments in the future, we may not
retain a sufficient amount of cash to finance growth opportunities, meet any large unanticipated
liquidity requirements or fund our operations in the event of a significant business downturn. In
addition, because a significant portion of cash available will be distributed to holders of our common
stock under our dividend policy, our ability to pursue any material expansion of our business, including
through acquisitions, increased capital spending or other increases of our expenditures, will depend
more than it otherwise would on our ability to obtain third party financing. We cannot assure you that
such financing will be available to us at all, or at an acceptable cost. If we are unable to take timely
18
advantage of growth opportunities, our future financial condition and competitive position may be
harmed, which in turn may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Not applicable.
Item 2. Properties
We are headquartered in Milwaukee, WI and currently have manufacturing facilities in Milwaukee,
WI, and Rockland, ME. We closed our Johnson City, TN facility in August 2010, and are currently
holding it for sale. Additionally, we operate a sourcing office in China. We operate as a single segment.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
In the ordinary course of business, we are engaged in various litigation primarily including product
liability and intellectual property disputes. However, management does not believe that any current
litigation is material to our operations or financial position. In addition, we are not currently party to
any environmental-related claims or legal matters.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
Our executive officers as of December 31, 2011 were as follows:
Name
Age
Position
James Janik . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Robert McCormick . . . . . . . . .
Mark Adamson . . . . . . . . . . . .
Keith Hagelin . . . . . . . . . . . . .
President and Chief Executive Officer; Director
55
51 Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
53 Vice President, Sales and Marketing
51 Vice President, Operations
James Janik has been serving as our President and Chief Executive Officer since 2000 and as a
director since 2004. Mr. Janik was General Manager of our Western Products division from 1994 to
2000 and Vice President of Marketing and Sales from 1998 to 2000. Prior to joining us, Mr. Janik was
the Vice President of Marketing and Sales of Sunlite Plastics Inc., a custom extruder of thermoplastic
materials, for two years. During the 11 prior years, Mr. Janik held a number of key marketing, sales
and production management positions for John Deere Company.
Robert McCormick has been serving as our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer since
September 2004 and as our Secretary since May 2005. Mr. McCormick served as our Assistant
Secretary from September 2004 to May 2005 and as our Treasurer from September 2004 through
December 2010. Prior to joining us, Mr. McCormick served as President and Chief Executive Officer of
Xymox Technology Inc. from 2001 to 2004. Prior to that, Mr. McCormick served in various capacities in
the Newell Rubbermaid Corporation, including President from 2000 to 2001 and Vice President Group
Controller from 1997 to 2000. While Mr. McCormick served as President, he was responsible for
Newell’s Mirro / Wearever Cookware, and as Vice President Group Controller, he was responsible for
worldwide strategic and financial responsibilities for 12 company divisions with sales of over two billion
dollars.
19
Mark Adamson has been serving as our Vice President, Sales and Marketing since 2007. Prior to
joining us, Mr. Adamson held numerous senior level management positions with industry leaders in the
grounds care industry, including John Deere Company from 1980 to 2002 and Gehl Corporation from
2002 to 2007. From 2003 to 2005, he was the Manager, Regional Sales & Distribution of Gehl
Company, directing the sales and marketing activities of certain sales field managers in the
northeastern United States responsible for Gehl product sales and rental., and from 2005 to 2007, he
was the Director, Training and Customer Support, where he directed the aftermarket and training
activities of five departments and thirty-two individuals responsible for Gehl and Mustang products
worldwide. From 1980 to 2002, Mr. Adamson held several senior level management positions with John
Deere Company.
Keith Hagelin has been serving as our Vice President, Operations since 2009, having previously
spent twelve years in progressive roles with us, including Plant Manager and General Manager—
Rockland and most recently Vice President of Manufacturing from 2007 to 2009. Prior to joining
Douglas, Mr. Hagelin spent 13 years at Raytheon Corporation in various manufacturing, production
and new product development roles.
Executive officers are elected by, and serve at the discretion of, the Board of Directors. There are
no family relationships between any of our directors or executive officers.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases
of Equity Securities
The Company’s common stock is listed, and principally traded, on the NYSE. The Company’s
symbol for its common stock is ‘‘PLOW.’’ The following table sets forth the range of high and low per
share sales prices of the Company’s common stock and per share dividends for the periods indicated.
As the company was not listed until it listed its common stock in the second quarter 2010 in connection
with the IPO, no market price data is available for the first quarter of 2010.
2011
Price Range
2010
Price Range
High
Low
Dividends
High
Low
Dividends
Fourth Quarter . . . . . . . . .
Third Quarter . . . . . . . . . .
Second Quarter . . . . . . . . .
First Quarter . . . . . . . . . . .
$15.57
16.27
16.68
16.96
$12.50
11.38
14.10
13.48
$0.21
0.20
0.20
0.57
$16.84
13.00
12.54
—
$11.97
10.20
10.93
—
$0.20
0.18
—
—
At March 13, 2012, there were 24 record holders of our Common Stock.
In accordance with the Company’s dividend policy, dividends are declared and paid quarterly at
the discretion of the board of directors. Additionally, special dividends may be declared and paid at the
discretion of the board of directors. The first quarterly dividend to common shareholders subsequent to
IPO was made in the third quarter of 2010 for $0.1825 per share paid on September 30, 2010.
Additionally, the Company paid a $0.20 per share quarterly dividend on December 31, 2010. In the first
quarter of 2011, the Company both declared and paid a special dividend of $0.37 in addition to a
stated dividend of $0.20. In both the second and third quarters of 2011, the Company both declared
and paid a stated dividend of $0.20 per share. In the fourth quarter of 2011, the Company increased its
annual stated dividend from $0.80 to $0.82 and both declared and paid a dividend of $0.205 per share.
The Company’s senior credit facilities include certain negative and operating covenants, including
restrictions on its ability to pay dividends, and other customary covenants, representations and
warranties and events of default. The senior credit facilities entered into and recorded by the
20
Company’s subsidiaries significantly restrict its subsidiaries from paying dividends and otherwise
transferring assets to Douglas Dynamics, Inc. The terms of the Company’s revolving credit facility
specifically restrict the Company from paying dividends if a minimum availability under the revolving
credit facility, the greater of $10.5 million and 15% of the aggregate revolving commitments at the time
of determination, is not maintained. Additionally, both senior credit facilities restrict the Company from
paying dividends above certain levels not to exceed $5.25 million in any fiscal quarter of 2011
calculated without regard to a one-time special dividend not to exceed $8.0 million, $5.5 million in any
fiscal quarter of 2012, $5.75 million in any fiscal quarter of 2013, $6.0 million in any fiscal quarter of
2014, $6.25 million in any fiscal quarter of 2015 and $6.5 million in any fiscal quarter of 2016 and
thereafter or at all if an event of default has occurred. These restrictions would affect the Company
indirectly since the Company relies principally on distributions from its subsidiaries to have funds
available for the payment of dividends.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table sets forth information with respect to compensation plans under which equity
securities of the Company are authorized for issuance as of December 31, 2011.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
PLAN CATEGORY
Equity compensation plans approved by
security holders:(1)
2010 Stock Incentive Plan . . . . . . . . . . . .
2004 Stock Incentive Plan . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity compensation plans not approved by
security holders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Number of securities
to be issued upon
the exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding
options,
warrants and rights
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected
in the first column)
20,612
37,240
—
57,852
$ —
$4.21
—
$2.71
1,779,602
—
—
1,779,602
(1) Includes the Company’s 2010 Stock Incentive Plan and 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, both of which
were approved by our stockholders prior to our IPO.
The following information in this Item 5 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is not deemed to be
‘‘soliciting material’’ or to be ‘‘filed’’ with the SEC or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act
of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent we specifically incorporate it by
reference into such a filing.
The graph set forth below compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock
between May 5, 2010 (the date of our initial public offering, or IPO) and December 31, 2011, with the
cumulative total return of The Dow Jones Industrial Average and Russell 2000 Index. This graph
assumes the investment of $100 on May 5, 2010 in our common stock at our IPO offering price of
21
$11.25 per share, the Dow Jones Industrial Average and Russell 2000 Index, and assumes the
reinvestment of dividends.
150
130
110
s
r
a
l
l
o
D
90
70
50
4/3 0/2 0 1 0
6/3 0/2 0 1 0
8/3 1/2 0 1 0
1 0/3 1/2 0 1 0
1 2/3 1/2 0 1 0
2/2 8/2 0 1 1
4/3 0/2 0 1 1
6/3 0/2 0 1 1
8/3 1/2 0 1 1
1 0/3 1/2 0 1 1
1 2/3 1/2 0 1 1
PLOW
Dow Jones Industrial Average
Russell 2000
28FEB201207322536
We did not sell any equity securities during 2011, in offerings that were not registered under the
Securities Act of 1933.
We did not make any purchases of equity securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during 2011.
Item 6. Selected Consolidated Financial Data
The following table sets forth our selected historical consolidated financial data for the periods and
at the dates indicated. The selected historical consolidated financial data as of December 31, 2010 and
2011 and for the three years in the periods ended December 31, 2011 are derived from our audited
consolidated financial statements.
The selected historical consolidated financial data as of December 2007, 2008 and 2009 and for the
years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008 is derived from our historical financial statements not
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The selected consolidated financial data presented below should be read in conjunction with our
consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this document.
Selected Balance Sheet Data
Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total current liabilities
Total debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total redeemable stock and shareholders’
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
As of December 31,
(in thousands)
$ 35,519
91,491
375,649
19,013
234,363
283,705
$ 53,552
115,414
391,264
23,858
233,513
293,203
$ 69,073
133,534
404,619
25,187
232,663
296,395
$ 20,149
88,972
348,043
15,976
121,154
178,550
$ 39,432
103,462
359,017
32,611
122,937
195,628
equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
91,944
98,061
108,224
169,493
163,389
22
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data
Total sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income from operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax expense (benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income (loss) per basic share, as
adjusted(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income (loss) per diluted share, as
adjusted(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
For the year ended December 31,
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
(in thousands, except per share data)
$140,065
42,816
20,636
(749)
(1,057)
$180,108
62,197
35,636
6,793
11,471
$174,342
57,078
29,439
3,986
9,843
$176,795
60,301
21,408
872
1,662
$208,798
71,817
40,181
11,332
19,040
$
$
(0.07) $
0.79
(0.07) $
0.77
$
$
0.68
0.67
$
$
0.09
0.09
$
$
0.87
0.85
For the year ended December 31,
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
(in thousands)
Other Data
Adjusted EBITDA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Capital expenditures(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$32,745
$ 1,049
$47,742
$ 3,160
$45,180
$ 8,200
$47,345
$ 3,009
$52,461
$ 2,373
(1) Represents net income (loss) per share after giving effect to a 23.75-for-one stock split of our
common stock that occurred in conjunction with the initial public offering.
(2) Capital expenditures for the year ended December 31, 2009 include $5 million related to the
investments in our Milwaukee, Wisconsin and Rockland, Maine manufacturing facilities to support
the closure of our Johnson City, Tennessee manufacturing facility.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations for the years
ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011 should be read together with our audited consolidated financial
statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Some of the
information contained in this discussion and analysis or set forth elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K, including information with respect to our plans and strategies for our business, includes
forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. You should review the ‘‘Risk Factors’’ section
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of important factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially from the results described in, or implied by, the forward-looking statements contained in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Results of Operations
Overview
In assessing our results of operations in a given period, one of the primary factors we consider is
the level of snowfall experienced within the prior snow season. We typically compare the snowfall level
in a given period both to the snowfall level in the prior season and to those snowfall levels we consider
to be average. References to ‘‘average snowfall’’ levels below refer to the aggregate average inches of
snowfall recorded in 66 cities in 26 snow-belt states in the United States during the annual snow
season, from October 1 through March 31, from 1980 to 2011. During this period, snowfall averaged
3,038 inches, with the low in such period being 2,094 inches and the high being 4,502 inches.
23
During the six-month snow seasons ending March 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011, we experienced above
average snowfall (approximately 20%, 18% and 37% above average during the six months ending
March 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011 snow seasons, respectively). Despite above average snowfalls during
these periods, we believe that the economic downturn resulted in lower sales of snowplows and sand
and salt spreaders, but increased sales of our parts and accessories as a percentage of total net sales
during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011 as compared to prior periods. We
experienced lower equipment and higher parts and accessories sales as weakened economic conditions
tend to cause our end-users to delay purchase of replacement snow and ice control equipment and
instead repair their existing equipment.
Sales of parts and accessories for 2011 and 2010 were $31.0 million and $25.0 million, respectively,
or approximately 51.2% and 21.9% higher than average annual parts and accessories sales over the
preceding ten years (from 2002 to 2007, sales of parts and accessories ranged from approximately
$9 million to $19 million per year, with an average of approximately $15 million). Management believes
the increased sales of parts and accessories are largely a result of the deferral of new equipment
purchases due to the severe economic downturn that began in 2008 from which conservative re-
ordering has continued subsequently, as many end-users chose to extend the life of their existing
equipment beyond the typical replacement cycle. In 2011, unit sales increased 12.8% which was the first
significant increase since 2008, which management believes is a direct result of higher than normal
snowfall in the six month snow season ending March 31, 2011. Management believes that absent the
recent economic downturn, equipment sales in 2011, 2010 and 2009 would have been considerably
higher due to the high levels of snowfall during the year. Although equipment unit sales increased
significantly in 2011, they were only 1% above the immediately preceding ten-year average despite
snowfall levels in snow season ending March 31, 2011 that were approximately 26% above the
immediately preceding ten-year average (excluding units sold by Blizzard Corporation prior to its
acquisition by us in November 2005). Equipment unit sales in 2010 remained 12% below the
immediately preceding ten-year average, despite the fact that snowfall levels in snow season ending
March 31, 2010 were approximately 13% above the immediately preceding ten-year average (excluding
units sold by Blizzard Corporation prior to its acquisition by us in November 2005). Management
believes this deferral of new equipment purchases could result in an elevated multi-year replacement
cycle as the economy recovers.
The following table shows our sales of snow and ice control equipment and related parts and
accessories as a percentage of net sales for the periods indicated. During the years ended December 31,
2009, 2010 and 2011, we sold 44,444, 45,054 and 50,801 units of snow and ice control equipment,
respectively.
Year Ended
December 31,
2009
2010
2011
Equipment
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
85% 86% 85%
Parts and accessories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
15% 14% 15%
The following table sets forth, for the periods presented, the consolidated statements of income of
the Company and its subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation. In the table below and throughout this ‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations,’’ consolidated statements of income data for the years
ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial
statements. The information contained in the table below should be read in conjunction with our
24
consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
For the year ended December 31,
2009
2010
2011
Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$174,342
117,264
(in thousands)
$176,795
116,494
$208,798
136,981
Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Selling, general, and administrative expense . . . . . .
Intangibles amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Management fees-related party . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income from operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
57,078
20,085
6,161
1,393
29,439
60,301
26,509
6,001
6,383
21,408
Interest expense, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss on extinguishment of debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other income (expense), net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(15,520)
—
(90)
(10,943)
(7,967)
36
Income before taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
13,829
Income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3,986
2,534
872
71,817
26,389
5,201
46
40,181
(8,918)
(673)
(218)
30,372
11,332
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
9,843
$
1,662
$ 19,040
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the percentage of certain items in our
consolidated statement of income data, relative to net sales:
For the year ended December 31,
2009
2010
2011
(in thousands)
Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
65.6%
65.9%
67.3%
Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Selling, general, and administrative expense . . . . . .
Intangibles amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Management fees-related party . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income from operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss on extinguishment of debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other income (expense), net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income before taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
32.7%
11.5%
3.5%
0.8%
16.9%
(8.9)%
0.0%
(0.1)%
7.9%
2.3%
5.6%
34.1%
15.0%
3.4%
3.6%
12.1%
(6.2)%
(4.5)%
0.0%
1.4%
0.5%
0.9%
34.4%
12.7%
2.5%
0.0%
19.2%
(4.3)%
(0.3)%
(0.1)%
14.5%
5.4%
9.1%
25
Year Ended December 31, 2011 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2010
Net Sales. Net sales were $208.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to
$176.8 million in 2010, an increase of $32.0 million, or 18.1%. This increase was primarily driven by
increases of $26.0 million in sales of snow and ice control equipment and $6.0 million in parts and
accessories sales. The increase in sales of snow and ice control equipment for the year ended
December 31, 2011 was attributable to (1) an increase in sales volume of snow and ice control
equipment of $19.4 million, or 12.8%, as compared to the prior year and (2) price increases that we
implemented in the third quarter of 2010 and that extended throughout the remainder of 2010 and
2011. Additionally, we implemented a temporary one percent surcharge in both the second and third
quarters of 2011 due to inflationary costs due to increases in costs of commodities, while no such
surcharges existed in 2010 and we increased prices by three percent effective in the fourth quarter of
2011. The increase in sales volume was largely a result of the above average snow season ending
March 31, 2011. Net sales of parts and accessories increased in the year ended December 31, 2011
from the year ended December 31, 2010 by 24.0%, from $25.0 million to $31.0 million. Net sales of
parts and accessories remained comparatively high in 2011, exceeding the preceding ten-year average by
approximately 51.2%. As discussed above, the comparatively strong sales of parts and accessories was
due in large part to above average snowfall resulting in increased equipment usage and subsequent
repair. Additionally, equipment sales were only slightly higher (1% above the immediately preceding
ten-year average), as many end-users continue to repair their existing snow and ice control equipment
instead of purchasing new equipment.
Cost of Sales. Cost of sales was $137.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared
to $116.5 million in 2010, an increase of $20.5 million, or 17.6%. This increase was driven primarily by
increased volume as cost of sales as a percentage of total sales did not fluctuate significantly. Cost of
sales as a percentage of net sales decreased slightly from 65.9% for the year ended December 31, 2010
to 65.6% for the year ended December 31, 2011. Negative inflationary commodity experience
throughout the year was more than offset by lower costs per unit resulting from increases in volume of
equipment units and parts and accessories. As a percentage of cost of sales, fixed and variable costs
were approximately 15% and 85%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2011 versus
approximately 19% and 81%, respectively for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Gross Profit. Gross profit was $71.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to
$60.3 million in 2010, an increase of $11.5 million, or 19.1%, due to the increase in net sales volume
described above under ‘‘—Net Sales’’ and ‘‘—Cost of Sales.’’ As a percentage of net sales, gross profit
increased from 34.1% for the year ended December 31, 2010 to 34.4% for the corresponding period in
2011, as a result of the factors discussed above under ‘‘—Net Sales’’ and ‘‘—Cost of Sales.’’
Selling, General and Administrative Expense. Selling, general and administrative expenses, including
intangible asset amortization and management fees, were $31.6 million for the year ended
December 31, 2011 compared to $38.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, a decrease of
$7.3 million, or 18.7%, driven by non-recurring expenses incurred at the time of the IPO in 2010. The
non-recurring charges associated with the IPO totaled $8.5 million, and were comprised of the buyout
of the management services agreement at $5.8 million, compensation expense associated with net
exercises of stock options totaling $1.7 million and the expense and payment of cash bonuses under the
our liquidity bonus plan of $1.0 million. Additionally, in 2010 there was non-recurring compensation
expense associated with net exercises of stock options subsequent to the IPO totaling $1.2 million. In
addition, the closure costs associated with the Johnson City facility were $0.7 million in the prior year.
Amortization expense decreased $0.8 million compared to 2010 due to certain intangible assets
becoming fully amortized. Additionally, contributing to the reduction, in 2011, we spent $0.9 million
less on legal and consulting fees compared to 2010 in order to defend patents and explore potential
acquisitions. Meanwhile, offsetting the decreases, in 2011 we incurred higher incentive based
26
compensation of $2.1 million due to better operating results. Recurring stock based compensation
increased $0.8 million compared to 2010 due to a full year as a public company in the current year. We
spent $1.3 million in 2011 on offering costs to allow our former principal stockholders to dispose of
their remaining holdings in our common stock. Finally, health insurance costs increased $0.6 million in
the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to 2010. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and
administrative expenses, including intangibles amortization and management fees, decreased from
22.0% for the year ended December 31, 2010 to 15.2% for the corresponding period in 2011 due to
items discussed above.
Interest Expense.
Interest expense was $8.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2011
compared to $10.9 million in the corresponding period in 2010, a decrease of $2.0 million. This
decrease was due to less interest expense as a result of the redemption of our 73⁄4% Senior Notes due
2012 (‘‘Senior Notes’’) with proceeds from the IPO, additional borrowings under our senior credit
facilities and cash on hand. Additionally, interest expense was lower for year ending December 31, 2011
compared to 2010 as we incurred a favorable rate as a result of the April 2011 refinancing.
Loss on Extinguishment of Debt. Loss on extinguishment of debt totaling $0.7 million for the year
ended December 31, 2011 was entirely driven by our entry into a new term loan facility resulting in a
significant modification of our debt which resulted in the write off of unamortized capitalized deferred
financing costs of $0.3 million and write off of unamortized debt discount of $0.3 million. Loss on
extinguishment of debt totaling $8.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 was entirely driven
by costs associated with the amendment of our senior credit facilities and the redemption of the Senior
Notes, including both the call premium on the redemption of our Senior Notes, and the write-off of
unamortized deferred financing costs relating to the redemption of our Senior Notes and the
amendment of our senior credit facilities.
Income Taxes. Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between
the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for
income tax purposes. The largest item affecting deferred taxes is the difference between book and tax
amortization of goodwill and other intangibles amortization. Our effective combined federal and state
tax rate for 2011 was 37.3% compared to 34.4% for 2010. The effective tax rate for the year ended
December 31, 2011 is higher than 2010 due to an increase in federal rate from 34.0% in year ending
December 31, 2010 compared to 35.0% for the year ending December 31, 2011.
Net Income. Net income for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $19.0 million compared to
net income of $1.7 million for the corresponding period in 2010, an increase of $17.3 million. This
increase was driven by the factors described above, and primarily by the non-recurring charges
associated with the IPO incurred in 2010.
Year Ended December 31, 2010 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2009
Net Sales. Net sales were $176.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to
$174.3 million in 2009, an increase of $2.5 million, or 1.4%. This increase was primarily driven by a
$4.3 million increase in sales of snow and ice control equipment, slightly offset by a $1.9 million
decrease in parts and accessories sales. The increase in sales of snow and ice control equipment for the
year ended December 31, 2010 was attributable to (1) an increase in sales volume of snow and ice
control equipment of $2.1 million, or 1.4%, as compared to the prior year and (2) price increases that
we implemented in the second quarter of 2010 and that extended throughout 2010. The 1.4% increase
in sales volume was largely a result of strengthening economic conditions towards the end of 2010
which we believed led to lower parts and accessories sales compared to 2009. However, compared to a
ten year historical average, parts and accessories sales were still higher than average, while equipment
sales were lower than average, as many end-users continue to repair their existing snow and ice control
equipment instead of purchasing new equipment. Net sales of parts and accessories declined in the year
27
ended December 31, 2010 from the year ended December 31, 2009 by 7.0%, from $26.9 million to
$25.0 million. Notwithstanding this decline, net sales of parts and accessories remained comparatively
high in 2010, exceeding the preceding ten-year average by approximately 34.4%. As discussed above,
the comparatively strong sales of parts and accessories was due in large part to the continued downturn
in general economic conditions and local economic conditions in the snowbelt regions, which we
believed led many of our end-users to repair their existing snow and ice control equipment instead of
purchasing new equipment.
Cost of Sales. Cost of sales was $116.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared
to $117.3 million in 2009, a decrease of $0.8 million, or 0.7%. This decrease was driven primarily by
reduced costs due to material cost savings as steel costs were lower in 2010 as compared to 2009. Steel
purchases were approximately 15% and 18% of our sales revenue for the years ending December 31,
2010 and 2009, respectively. Lower steel costs were slightly offset by increases in snow and ice control
equipment unit volume as discussed above. Costs of sales as a percentage of net sales decreased from
67.3% for the year ended December 31, 2009 to 65.9% for the year ended December 31, 2010 as a
result of the material cost savings as discussed above. As a percentage of cost of sales, fixed and
variable costs were approximately 19% and 81%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2010
versus approximately 17% and 83%, respectively for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Gross Profit. Gross profit was $60.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to
$57.1 million in 2009, an increase of $3.2 million, or 5.6%, due to the increase in net sales described
above under ‘‘—Net Sales’’ And the reduction in material costs as described under ‘‘—Cost of Sales.’’
As a percentage of net sales, gross profit increased from 32.7% for the year ended December 31, 2009
to 34.1% for the corresponding period in 2010, as a result of the factors discussed above under ‘‘—Net
Sales’’ and ‘‘—Cost of Sales.’’
Selling, General and Administrative Expense. Selling, general and administrative expenses, including
intangible asset amortization and management fees, were $38.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2010 compared to $27.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, an increase of
$11.3 million, or 40.9%, driven by non-recurring expenses incurred at the time of the IPO. The
non-recurring charges associated with the IPO totaled $8.5 million, and were comprised of the buyout
of the management services agreement at $5.8 million, compensation expense associated with net
exercises of stock options totaling $1.7 million and the expense and payment of cash bonuses under our
liquidity bonus plan of $1.0 million. Additionally, there was non-recurring compensation expense
associated with net exercises of stock options subsequent to the IPO totaling $1.2 million. We also
spent $1.3 million more in 2010 on defending our patents compared to 2009. Finally, the closure costs
associated with the Johnson City facility increased $0.4 million compared to the prior year. As a
percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses, including intangibles amortization
and management fees, increased from 15.8% for the year ended December 31, 2009 to 22.0% for the
corresponding period in 2010 due to the non-recurring charges discussed above.
Interest Expense.
Interest expense was $10.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2010
compared to $15.5 million in the corresponding period in 2009, a decrease of $4.6 million. This
decrease was due to less interest expense as a result of the redemption of our 73⁄4% Senior Notes due
2012 (‘‘Senior Notes’’) with proceeds from the IPO, additional borrowings under our senior credit
facilities and cash on hand.
Loss on Extinguishment of Debt. Loss on extinguishment of debt totaling $8.0 million for the year
ended December 31, 2010 was entirely driven by costs associated with the amendment of our senior
credit facilities and the redemption of the Senior Notes, including both the call premium on the
redemption of our Senior Notes, and the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs relating to
the redemption of our Senior Notes and the amendment of our senior credit facilities.
28
Income Taxes. Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between
the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for
income tax purposes. The largest item affecting deferred taxes is the difference between book and tax
amortization of goodwill and other intangibles amortization. Our effective combined federal and state
tax rate for 2010 was 34.4% compared to 28.8% for 2009. The effective tax rate for the year ended
December 31, 2010 is higher than 2009 due to state net operating loss allowances (‘‘NOLs’’) related to
the closure of the Johnson City, Tennessee facility. Additionally, the 2009 effective rate was lower due
to the release of a valuation allowance for Wisconsin NOLs in the first quarter of 2009 due to a tax law
change in the state of Wisconsin resulting in the ability to utilize the NOLs in future periods.
Net Income. Net income for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $1.7 million compared to net
income of $9.8 million for the corresponding period in 2009, a decrease of $8.1 million, or 82.7%. This
decrease was driven by the factors described above, and primarily by the non-recurring charges
associated with the IPO.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains financial information calculated other than in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (‘‘GAAP’’).
These non-GAAP measures include:
(cid:127) Free cash flow;
(cid:127) Adjusted net income; and
(cid:127) Adjusted EBITDA.
These non-GAAP disclosures should not be construed as an alternative to the reported results
determined in accordance with GAAP.
Free cash flow (as defined below) for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $45.4 million
compared to $12.8 million in the corresponding period in 2010, an increase in cash provided of
$32.6 million, or 255.2%. The increase in cash provided is primarily a result of $32.0 million less cash
used by operating activities, as discussed below under Liquidity and Capital Resources. In addition to
the changes in cash used by operating activities, capital expenditures decreased by $0.6 million. In 2010,
there were higher capital expenditures to accommodate the increased production demands in
Milwaukee and Rockland because of the closure of our Johnson City, TN manufacturing plant in the
first half of the year.
Free cash flow is a non-GAAP financial measure, which we define as net cash provided by
operating activities less capital expenditures. Free cash flow should be evaluated in addition to, and not
considered a substitute for, other financial measures such as net income and cash flow provided by
operations. We believe that free cash flow represents our ability to generate additional cash flow from
our business operations.
The following table reconciles net cash provided by operating activities, a GAAP measure, to free
cash flow, a non-GAAP measure.
Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition of property and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . .
For the year ended December 31,
2011
2010
2009
$47,728
(2,373)
(in thousands)
$15,777
(3,009)
$25,571
(8,200)
Free cash flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$45,355
$12,768
$17,371
29
Adjusted net income represents net income as determined under GAAP, excluding certain expenses
incurred at the time of our IPO in 2010 (namely the buyout of our management services agreement,
loss on extinguishment of debt, stock based compensation expense associated with the net exercise of
stock options and the payment of cash bonuses under our liquidity bonus plan); certain expenses
incurred at the time of our secondary offering in 2011; costs incurred to pursue acquisitions and a loss
on extinguishment of debt incurred in 2011. We believe that the presentation of adjusted net income
for the years ended December 30, 2011 and December 30, 2010 allows investors to make meaningful
comparisons of our operating performance between periods and to view our business from the same
perspective as our management. Because the excluded items are not predictable or consistent,
management does not consider them when evaluating our performance or when making decisions
regarding allocation of resources.
The following table presents a reconciliation of net income, the most comparable GAAP financial
measure, to adjusted net income for the years ending December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
(in millions)
Net Income—(GAAP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Addback non-recurring expenses, net of tax at 37.0% and
38.0%, for 2011 and 2010, respectively:
—Buyout of the management services agreement . . . . .
—Loss on extinguishment of debt
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—Liquidity bonus payment
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—Non-recurring stock based compensation expense . . .
—Acquisition costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—Offering costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Years Ended
December 31,
2011
December 31,
2010
$19.0
$ 1.7
—
0.4
—
—
0.6
0.8
3.6
4.9
0.6
1.9
—
—
Adjusted Net Income—(non-GAAP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$20.8
$12.7
Adjusted EBITDA represents net income before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, as
further adjusted for certain non-recurring charges related to the closure of our Johnson City, Tennessee
manufacturing facility and certain non-recurring legal and consulting fees, as well as management fees
paid by us to affiliates of our principal stockholders, stock based compensation, payment of cash
bonuses under our liquidity bonus plan, loss on extinguishment of debt and offering costs. We use, and
we believe our investors benefit from the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA in evaluating our
operating performance because it provides us and our investors with additional tools to compare our
operating performance on a consistent basis by removing the impact of certain items that management
believes do not directly reflect our core operations. In addition, we believe that Adjusted EBITDA is
useful to investors and other external users of our consolidated financial statements in evaluating our
operating performance as compared to that of other companies, because it allows them to measure a
company’s operating performance without regard to items such as interest expense, taxes, depreciation
and amortization, which can vary substantially from company to company depending upon accounting
methods and book value of assets and liabilities, capital structure and the method by which assets were
acquired. Our management also uses Adjusted EBITDA for planning purposes, including the
preparation of our annual operating budget and financial projections. Management also uses Adjusted
EBITDA to evaluate our ability to make certain payments, including dividends, in compliance with our
senior credit facilities, which is determined based on a calculation of ‘‘Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA’’
that is substantially similar to Adjusted EBITDA.
Adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $52.5 million compared to
$47.3 million in the corresponding period in 2010, an increase of $5.2 million, or 11.0%. As a
percentage of net sales, Adjusted EBITDA decreased from 26.8% for the year ended December 31,
30
2010 to 25.1% for the year ended December 31, 2011. Adjusted EBITDA for the year ended
December 31, 2010 was $47.3 million compared to Adjusted EBITDA of $45.2 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009, an increase of $2.1 million, or 4.6%. As a percentage of net sales, Adjusted
EBITDA increased from 25.9% for the year ended December 31, 2009 to 26.8% for the year ended
December 31, 2010. In addition to the specific changes resulting from the exceptions, the changes to
Adjusted EBITDA for the periods discussed resulted from factors discussed above under ‘‘—Results of
Operations.’’
The following table presents a reconciliation of net income, the most comparable GAAP financial
measure, to Adjusted EBITDA, for each of the periods indicated.
For the year ended December 31,
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ (1,057) $11,471
(in thousands)
$ 9,843
$ 1,662
$19,040
Interest expense—net . . . . . . . .
Income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation expense . . . . . . . .
Amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
EBITDA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Management fees . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock based compensation . . . . .
Loss on extinguishment of debt .
Management liquidity bonus . . .
Offering costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other non-recurring charges(1) .
19,622
(749)
4,632
6,164
28,612
1,400
—
2733
—
—
—
17,299
6,793
4,650
6,160
46,373
1,369
—
—
—
—
—
15,520
3,986
5,797
6,161
41,307
1,393
732
—
—
—
1,748
10,943
872
5,704
6,001
25,182
6,383
4,029
7,967
1,003
—
2,781
8,918
11,332
2,975
5,201
47,466
46
1,873
673
—
1,342
1,061
Adjusted EBITDA . . . . . . . . . . . .
$32,745
$47,742
$45,180
$47,345
$52,461
(1) Reflects severance and one-time, non-recurring expenses for costs related to the closure
of our Johnson City facility of $1,054 and $1,435 for the years ended 2009 and 2010,
respectively, $694, $2,013 and $1,061 of unrelated legal and consulting fees for the years
ended 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively, and a $667 gain on other post employment
benefit plan curtailment related to the Johnson City plant closure for the year ended
2010.
Discussion of Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of
these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, costs and expenses, and related disclosures. These
estimates and assumptions are often based on judgments that we believe to be reasonable under the
circumstances at the time made, but all such estimates and assumptions are inherently uncertain and
unpredictable. Actual results may differ from those estimates and assumptions, and it is possible that
other professionals, applying their own judgment to the same facts and circumstances, could develop
and support alternative estimates and assumptions that would result in material changes to our
operating results and financial condition. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing
basis. Our estimates are based on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe
to be reasonable under the circumstances.
The most significant accounting estimates inherent in the preparation of our financial statements
include estimates used in the determination of liabilities related to pension obligations, recovery of
31
accounts receivable, impairment assessment of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets, as
well as estimates used in the determination of the lower of cost or market value of inventory and
liabilities related to taxation and product warranty.
We believe the following are the critical accounting policies that affect our financial condition and
results of operations.
Defined Benefit Pension Obligation
As discussed in Note 12 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K, the pension benefit obligation and related pension expense or income of our
pension plans are calculated in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (‘‘ASC’’) 715-30,
Defined Benefit Plans-Pension, and are impacted by certain actuarial assumptions, including the discount
rate and the expected rate of return on plan assets. Rates are evaluated on an annual basis considering
such factors as market interest rates and historical asset performance. Actuarial valuations for 2011 used a
discount rate of 4.6% and an expected long-term rate of return on plan assets of 7.25%. Our discount rate
reflects the expected future cash flow based upon our funding valuation assumptions and participant data at
the beginning of the plan year. The expected future cash flow was discounted by the Principal Financial
Group’s yield curve for the month preceding the 2011 year end.
In estimating the expected return on plan assets, we analyze historical and expected returns for
multiple asset classes. The overall rate for each asset class was developed by combining a long-term
inflation component, the risk-free real rate of return, and the associated risk premium. A weighted
average rate was then developed based upon those overall rates and the target asset allocation of the
plan. Changes in the discount rate and return on assets can have a significant effect on the funded
status of our pension plans, shareholders’ equity and related expense. We cannot predict these changes
in discount rates or investment returns and, therefore, cannot reasonably estimate whether the impact
in subsequent years will be significant. The funded status of our pension plans is the difference between
the projected benefit obligation and the fair value of its plan assets. The projected benefit obligation is
the actuarial present value of all benefits expected to be earned by our employees’ service adjusted for
future wage increases. At December 31, 2011, our pension obligation funded status was $14.2 million
underfunded.
Our funding policy for our pension plans is to contribute amounts at least equal to the minimum
annual amount required by applicable regulations. We contributed approximately $1.9 million to our
pension plans in 2011. See Note 12 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a more detailed description of our pension plans.
32
Revenue Recognition and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We recognize revenues upon shipment to the customer, which is when title passes and all of the
following conditions are satisfied: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) the price is
fixed or determinable; (3) collectability is reasonably assured; and (4) the product has been shipped
and we have no further obligations. Customers have no right of return privileges. Historically, product
returns have not been material and are permitted on an exception basis only.
We offer a variety of discounts and sales incentives to our distributors. The estimated liability for
sales discounts and allowances is recorded at the time of sale as a reduction of net sales. The liability is
estimated based on the costs of the program, the planned duration of the program and historical
experience.
We carry our accounts receivable at their face amount less an allowance for doubtful accounts. On
a periodic basis, we evaluate our accounts receivable and establish an allowance for doubtful accounts
based on a combination of specific distributor circumstances and credit conditions taking into account
the history of write-offs and collections. A receivable is considered past due if payment has not been
received within the period agreed upon in the invoice. Accounts receivable are written off after all
collection efforts have been exhausted. We take a security interest in the inventory as collateral for the
receivable but often do not have a priority security interest. See Note 2 to our audited consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information
regarding our allowance for doubtful accounts.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets are reviewed for potential impairment when events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be
held and used is measured by comparison of the carrying value of such assets to the undiscounted
future cash flows expected to be generated by the assets. If the carrying value of an asset exceeds its
estimated undiscounted future cash flows, an impairment provision is recognized to the extent that the
carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower
of the carrying amount or the fair value of the asset, less costs of disposition. Our management
considers such factors as current results, trends and future prospects, current market value, and other
economic and regulatory factors in performing these analyses. We determined that no long-lived assets
were impaired as of December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
We perform an annual impairment test for goodwill and trade names and more frequently if an
event or circumstances indicate that an impairment loss has been incurred. Conditions that would
trigger an impairment assessment include, but are not limited to, a significant adverse change in legal
factors or business climate that could affect the value of an asset. The analysis of potential impairment
of goodwill requires a two-step process. The first step is the estimation of fair value of the applicable
reporting unit. We have determined we have one reporting unit, and all significant decisions are made
on a companywide basis by our chief operating decision maker. The fair value of the reporting unit is
estimated by using a market approach. The estimated fair value is compared with our aggregate
carrying value. If our fair value is greater than the carrying amount, there is no impairment. If our
carrying amount is greater than the fair value, then the second step must be completed to measure the
amount of impairment, if any.
The second step calculates the implied fair value of the goodwill, which is compared to its carrying
value. The implied fair value of goodwill is calculated by valuing all of the tangible and intangible
assets of the reporting unit at the hypothetical fair value, assuming the reporting unit had been
acquired in a business combination. The excess of the fair value of the entire reporting unit over the
33
fair value of its identifiable assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of goodwill. If the implied fair
value of goodwill is less than the carrying value of goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized equal to
the difference. Annual impairment tests conducted by us on December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
resulted in no adjustment to the carrying value of our indefinite-lived intangibles and goodwill.
Our goodwill and trade name balances could be impaired in future periods. A number of factors,
many of which we have no ability to control, could affect our financial condition, operating results and
business prospects and could cause actual results to differ from the estimates and assumptions we
employed. These factors include:
(cid:127) a prolonged global economic crisis;
(cid:127) a significant decrease in the demand for our products;
(cid:127) the inability to develop new and enhanced products and services in a timely manner;
(cid:127) a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate;
(cid:127) an adverse action or assessment by a regulator; and
(cid:127) successful efforts by our competitors to gain market share in our markets.
Inventory Valuation
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Market is determined on the basis of
estimated realizable values. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out basis. We periodically review
our inventory for slow-moving, damaged and discontinued items and provide reserves to reduce such
items identified to their recoverable amounts.
Income Taxes
Our estimate of income taxes payable, deferred income taxes and the effective tax rate is based on
an analysis of many factors including interpretations of federal and state income tax laws, the difference
between tax and financial reporting bases and liabilities, estimates of amounts currently due or owed in
various jurisdictions, and current accounting standards. We review and update our estimates on a
quarterly basis as facts and circumstances change and actual results are known.
We have generated significant deferred tax assets as a result of goodwill and intangible asset book
versus tax differences as well as net operating loss carryforwards. In assessing the ability to realize these
deferred tax assets, we consider whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the
deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent
upon the generation of future taxable income during the years in which those temporary differences
become deductible. We consider the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future
taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. As a result of this analysis, we
have recorded a valuation allowance against certain of these deferred tax assets.
Accruals for tax contingencies, if any, are provided for in accordance with the requirements of
ASC 740—Income Taxes. See Note 10 to our audited consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information regarding our accounting for
income taxes.
Warranty Cost Recognition
We accrue for estimated warranty costs as sales are recognized and periodically assess the
adequacy of the recorded warranty liability and adjust the amount as necessary. Our warranties
generally provide, with respect to our snow and ice control equipment, that all material and
workmanship will be free from defect for a period of two years after the date of purchase by the
34
end-user, and with respect to our parts and accessories purchased separately, that such parts and
accessories will be free from defect for a period of one year after the date of purchase by the end-user.
Certain snowplows only provide for a one year warranty. We determine the amount of the estimated
warranty costs (and our corresponding warranty reserve) based on our prior five years of warranty
history utilizing a formula driven by historical warranty expense and applying management’s judgment.
We adjust our historical warranty costs to take into account unique factors such as the introduction of
new products into the marketplace that do not provide a historical warranty record to assess.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal sources of cash have been and we expect will continue to be cash from operations
and borrowings under our senior credit facilities.
Our primary uses of cash are to provide working capital, meet debt service requirements, finance
capital expenditures, pay dividends under our dividend policy and support our growth, including
through potential acquisitions, and for other general corporate purposes. For a description of the
seasonality of our working capital rates see ‘‘—Seasonality and Year-To-Year Variability.’’
Our Board of Directors has adopted a dividend policy that reflects an intention to distribute to our
stockholders a regular quarterly cash dividend. The declaration and payment of these dividends to
holders of our common stock is at the discretion of our Board of Directors and depends upon many
factors, including our financial condition and earnings, legal requirements, taxes and other factors our
Board of Directors may deem to be relevant. The terms of our indebtedness may also restrict us from
paying cash dividends on our common stock under certain circumstances. As a result of this dividend
policy, we may not have significant cash available to meet any large unanticipated liquidity
requirements. As a result, we may not retain a sufficient amount of cash to fund our operations or to
finance unanticipated capital expenditures or growth opportunities, including acquisitions. Our Board of
Directors may, however, amend, revoke or suspend our dividend policy at any time and for any reason.
As of December 31, 2011, we had liquidity comprised of $39 million in cash and cash equivalents
and borrowing availability of $70 million under our revolving credit facility. Borrowing availability
under our revolving credit facility is governed by a borrowing base, the calculation of which includes
cash on hand. Accordingly, use of cash on hand may also result in a reduction in the amount available
for borrowing under our revolving credit facility. Furthermore, our revolving credit facility requires us
to maintain at least $10.5 million of borrowing availability. We expect that cash on hand, cash
generated from operations, as well as available credit under our senior credit facilities will provide
adequate funds for the purposes described above for at least the next 12 months.
Cash Flow Analysis
Set forth below is summary cash flow information for each of the years ended December 31, 2009,
2010 and 2011.
Cash Flows (in thousands)
Year ended December 31,
2009
2010
2011
Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . .
Net cash used in investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash used in financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$25,571
(8,200)
(1,850)
$ 15,777
(2,783)
(61,918)
$ 47,728
(2,306)
(26,139)
Increase (Decrease) in cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$15,521
$(48,924) $ 19,283
35
Sources and Uses of Cash
During the three-year periods described above, net cash provided by operating activities was used
for funding capital investment, retiring preferred stock and paying related dividends, paying interest on
both our senior notes and senior credit facilities, and funding working capital requirements during our
pre-season shipping period.
The following table shows our cash and cash equivalents and inventories at December 31, 2009,
2010 and 2011.
Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$69,073
26,697
(in thousands)
$20,149
23,481
$39,432
24,005
December 31,
2009
2010
2011
Year Ended December 31, 2011 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2010
We had cash and cash equivalents of $39.4 million at December 31, 2011 compared to cash and
cash equivalents of $20.1 million at December 31, 2010. The table below sets forth a summary of the
significant sources and uses of cash for the periods presented.
Cash Flows (in thousands)
Year ended December 31,
2010
2011
Change
Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash used in investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash used in financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 15,777
(2,783)
(61,918)
$ 47,728
(2,306)
(26,139)
$31,951
477
35,779
202.5%
(17.1)%
(57.8)%
Increase (Decrease) in cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$(48,924) $ 19,283
$68,207
(139.4)%
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $32.0 million from the year ended
December 31, 2010 to the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase in cash provided by operating
activities was due to a $9.8 increase in net income adjusted for reconciling items. Additionally, accounts
receivable decline of $3.0 million and accounts payable increase of $2.2 million both positively
influenced operating cash flows. As we paid off the senior notes in 2010, accrued interest at the end of
2009 declined in 2010 $5.3 million, which increased cash used in operating activities in 2010.
Net cash used in investing activities decreased $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011,
compared to the corresponding period in 2010. This decrease was due to higher capital expenditures in
2010 to accommodate the increased production demands in Milwaukee, WI and Rockland, ME because
of the closure of our Johnson City, TN manufacturing plant.
Net cash used in financing activities decreased $35.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2011
compared to the corresponding period in 2010. The decrease was a result of our repayment of our
senior notes in the amount of $150 million in 2010. Offsetting cash used were net proceeds from the
IPO of $63.9 million and borrowings under the credit facility of $40 million in 2010. As we refinanced
our term loan in 2011 there was a net impact of $2.2 million in cash provided to us as we borrowed
$125.0 million less a $1.3 million discount, offset by debt repayments of $121.5 million. We also paid
dividends of $25.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2011, compared to dividends paid of
$8.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2010. We also received $1.3 million in 2011 for the
exercise of stock options, wheras all options exercised in 2010 were accomplished through ‘‘net
exercises’’ that resulted in no cash paid for the exercise price of the options.
36
Year Ended December 31, 2010 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2009
We had cash and cash equivalents of $20.1 million at December 31, 2010 compared to cash and
cash equivalents of $69.1 million at December 31, 2009. The table below sets forth a summary of the
significant sources and uses of cash for the periods presented.
Cash Flows (in thousands)
Year ended December 31,
2009
2010
Change
Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash used in investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash used in financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$25,571
(8,200)
(1,850)
$ 15,777
(2,783)
(61,918)
$ (9,794)
5,417
(38.3)%
(66.1)%
(60,068) 3,246.9%
Increase in cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$15,521
$(48,924) $(64,445)
(415.2)%
Net cash provided by operating activities decreased $9.8 million from the year ended December 31,
2009 to the year ended December 31, 2010. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities was
due to an $8.1 decrease in net income, caused in part by an $8.0 million loss on extinguishment of debt
that we recorded when we repaid our senior notes. As we paid off these notes, accrued interest
declined $5.3 million, which increased cash used in operating activities. Additionally, accounts
receivable growth of $4.9 million and accounts payable decline of $2.3 million both negatively impacted
operating cash flows. Slightly offsetting these uses of cash were an increase in stock based
compensation of $3.3 million and lower inventories of $3.2 million. Lower inventory levels have
resulted from the closure of our Johnson City, TN location in August 2010.
Net cash used in investing activities decreased $5.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2010,
compared to the corresponding period in 2009, mainly as a result of higher than normal capital
investments in 2009 of approximately $5.0 million in our manufacturing plants in Milwaukee, WI and
Rockland, ME to support the closure of our Johnson City, TN manufacturing facility in August 2010.
Net cash used in financing activities increased $60.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2010
compared to the corresponding period in 2009. The increase was a result of our repayment of our
senior notes in the amount of $150.0 million. Offsetting cash used were net proceeds from the IPO of
$63.9 million and borrowings under the credit facility of $40.0 million.
Future Obligations and Commitments
Contractual Obligations
We are subject to certain contractual obligations, including long-term debt and related interest. We
have net unrecognized tax benefits of $0.3 million as of December 31, 2011. However, we cannot make
a reasonably reliable estimate of the period of potential cash settlement of the underlying liabilities,
therefore, we have not included unrecognized tax benefits in calculating the obligations set forth in the
following table of significant contractual obligations as of December 31, 2011.
(Dollars in thousands)
Long-term debt(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest on long-term debt(2) . . . . . . . . . .
$122,937
44,444
Total
Less than 1 year
1 - 3 years
3 - 5 years
$11,071
7,399
$18,470
$ 2,142
14,583
$ 2,142
13,710
More than
5 years
$107,582
8,752
Total contracted cash obligations(3) . . . . .
$167,381
$16,725
$15,852
$116,334
(1) Long-term debt obligation is presented net of discount of $1.1 million at December 31, 2011.
(2) Assumes all debt will remain outstanding until maturity. Interest payments were calculated using
interest rates in effect as of December 31, 2011.
37
(3) Pension obligations are excluded from this table as we are unable to estimate the timing of
payments related to these obligations. The minimum required contribution to our pension plans
was $1.9 million in 2011 and is expected to be $2.5 million in 2012.
Senior Credit Facilities
On April 18, 2011, we amended our senior credit facilities to, among other things, (i) increase the
borrowing ability under the revolving credit agreement by $10 million, and (ii) amend certain of the
provisions in the senior credit facilities which govern our ability to pay dividends. Consequently, as of
April 18, 2011, our senior credit facilities consisted of a $125 million term loan facility and a
$70 million revolving credit facility with a group of banks. The previous term loans consisted of an
initial term loan of $85 million and a ‘‘tack on’’ of $40 million, and a $60 million revolving credit
facility. Prior to the April 2011 changes to our senior credit facilities, the interest on the original
$85 million term loan facility was (at our option) either the base rate (which shall be no less than 3%)
plus 3.5% or the eurodollar rate (which shall be no less than 2%) plus 4.5%. The interest for the
additional $40 million in our term loan facility was an interest rate equal to (at our option) either the
base rate (which shall be no less than 3%) plus 4% or the eurodollar rate (which shall be no less than
2%) plus 5%. Under the previous revolving credit facility, the margin for base rate loans was either
0.25% or 0.50% and the margin for eurodollar rate loans was either 1.25% or 1.50%, in each case
determined based on our leverage ratio from time to time.
The agreement for the new term loan (the ‘‘Term Loan Credit Agreement’’) provides for a senior
secured term loan facility in the aggregate principal amount of $125 million and generally bears interest
at (at our election) either (i) 3.25% per annum plus the greatest of (a) the Prime Rate (as defined in
the Term Loan Credit Agreement) in effect on such day, (b) the weighted average of the rates on
overnight Federal funds transactions with members of the Federal Reserve System arranged by Federal
funds brokers plus 0.50% and (c) 1.00% plus the greater of (1) the London Interbank Offered Rate for
a one month interest period multiplied by the Statutory Reserve Rate (as defined in the Term Loan
Credit Agreement) and (2) 1.50% or (ii) 4.25% per annum plus the greater of (a) the London
Interbank Offered Rate for the applicable interest period multiplied by the Statutory Reserve Rate and
(b) 1.50%. The revolving credit facility as amended and restated (the ‘‘Revolving Credit Agreement’’)
provides that we have the option to select whether borrowings will bear interest at either (i) 2.25% per
annum plus the London Interbank Offered Rate for the applicable interest period multiplied by the
Statutory Reserve Rate or (ii) 1.25% per annum plus the greatest of (a) the Prime Rate in effect on
such day, (b) the weighted average of the rates on overnight Federal funds transactions with members
of the Federal Reserve System arranged by Federal funds brokers plus 0.50% and (c) the London
Interbank Offered Rate for a one month interest period multiplied by the Statutory Reserve Rate plus
1%. The maturity date for our amended and restated revolving credit facility is April 18, 2016, and our
new term loan amortizes in nominal amounts quarterly with the balance payable on April 18, 2018.
The new term loan entered into in the second quarter of 2011 was issued at a $1.25 million
discount which is being amortized over the term of the new term loan.
Our entry into the new term loan facility resulted in a significant modification of our debt which
resulted in the write off of unamortized capitalized deferred financing costs of $0.3 million and write
off of unamortized debt discount of $0.3 million which in total resulted in a loss on extinguishment of
debt of $0.7 million in the Consolidated Statement of Income during the year ended December 31,
2011.
At December 31, 2011, we had no outstanding borrowings on the revolving credit facility and
remaining borrowing availability of $70 million.
Our senior credit facilities include certain negative and operating covenants, including restrictions
on our ability to pay dividends, and other customary covenants, representations and warranties and
38
events of default. The senior credit facilities entered into and recorded by our subsidiaries significantly
restrict our subsidiaries from paying dividends and otherwise transferring assets to us. The terms of our
revolving credit facility specifically restrict subsidiaries from paying dividends if a minimum availability
under the revolving credit facility is not maintained, and both senior credit facilities restrict subsidiaries
from paying dividends above certain levels or at all if an event of default has occurred. These
restrictions would affect us indirectly since we rely principally on distributions from our subsidiaries to
have funds available for the payment of dividends. In addition, the our revolving credit facility includes
a requirement that, subject to certain exceptions, capital expenditures may not exceed $10 million in
any calendar year and, if certain minimum availability under our revolving credit facility is not
maintained, that we comply with a monthly minimum fixed charge coverage ratio test of 1.0:1.0.
Compliance with the fixed charge coverage ratio test is subject to certain cure rights under the
Company’s revolving credit facility. At December 31, 2011, we were in compliance with the respective
covenants. The credit facilities are collateralized by substantially all assets of our assets.
In accordance with the senior credit facilities, we are required to make additional principal
prepayments over the above scheduled payments under certain conditions. This includes, in the case of
the term loan facility, 100% of the net cash proceeds of certain asset sales, certain insurance or
condemnation events, certain debt issuances, and, within 150 days of the end of the fiscal year, 50% of
excess cash flow, as defined, including a deduction for certain distributions (which percentage is
reduced to 25% or 0% upon the achievement of certain leverage ratio thresholds), for any fiscal year.
Excess cash flow is defined in the senior credit facilities as consolidated adjusted EBITDA (earnings
before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) plus a working capital adjustment less the sum of
repayments of debt and capital expenditures subject to certain adjustments, interest and taxes paid in
cash, management fees and certain restricted payments (including dividends or distributions). Working
capital adjustment is defined in the senior credit facilities as the change in working capital, defined as
current assets excluding cash and cash equivalents less current liabilities excluding current portion of
long term debt. As of December 31, 2011, we were not required to make an excess cash flow payment.
However, the company expects to make a voluntary prepayment of $10 million in 2012.
Each of the senior secured facilities entered into in the second quarter of 2011 includes a hedge
provision, which requires us to enter into an interest rate hedge commencing 90 days after the closing
date. The hedging provision required the Company to hedge the interest rate on at least 25% of the
aggregate outstanding principal amount of the term loans. The purpose of the interest rate swap is to
reduce our exposure to interest rate volatility. Effective June 20, 2011, we entered into an interest rate
swap agreement with a notional amount of $50 million. The interest rate swap negative fair value at
December 31, 2011 of $0.6 million is included in other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated
Balance Sheet. We have counterparty credit risk resulting from the interest rate swap, which we
monitors on an on-going basis. This risk lies with one global financial institution. Under the interest
rate swap agreement, effective as of July 18, 2011, we either receives or makes payments on a monthly
basis based on the differential between 6.335% and LIBOR plus 4.25% (with a LIBOR floor of 1.5%).
The interest rate swap contract on the term loan expires in December 2014.
Deductibility of Intangible and Goodwill Expense
We possess a favorable tax structure with approximately $18 million of annual tax-deductible
intangible and goodwill expense over the next nine years which may be utilized in the event we have
sufficient taxable income to utilize such benefit.
39
Impact of Inflation
We do not believe that inflation risk is material to our business or our financial condition, results
of operations or cash flows at this time. Historically, we have experienced normal raw material, labor
and fringe benefit inflation. To date we have been able to fully offset this inflation by providing higher
value products, which command higher prices. In previous years, we have experienced significant
increases in steel costs, but have been able to mitigate the effects of these increases through both
temporary and permanent steel surcharges. See ‘‘Risk Factors—The price of steel, a commodity
necessary to manufacture our products, is highly variable. If the price of steel increases, our gross
margins could decline.’’
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We are not party to any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have
a material current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues,
expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Seasonality and Year-To-Year Variability
Our business is seasonal and also varies from year-to-year. Consequently, our results of operations
and financial condition vary from quarter-to-quarter and from year-to-year as well. In addition, because
of this seasonality and variability, our results of operations for any quarter may not be indicative of
results of operations that may be achieved for a subsequent quarter or the full year, and may not be
similar to results of operations experienced in prior years.
Sales of our products are significantly impacted by the level, timing and location of snowfall, with
sales in any given year and region most heavily influenced by snowfall levels in the prior snow season
(which we consider to begin in October and end in March) in that region. This is due to the fact that
end-user demand for our products is driven primarily by the condition of their snow and ice control
equipment, and in the case of professional snowplowers, by their financial ability to purchase new or
replacement snow and ice control equipment, both of which are significantly affected by snowfall levels.
Heavy snowfall during a given winter causes usage of our products to increase, resulting in greater wear
and tear to our products and a shortening of their life cycles, thereby creating a need for replacement
snow and ice control equipment and related parts and accessories. In addition, when there is a heavy
snowfall in a given winter, the increased income our professional snowplowers generate from their
professional snowplow activities provides them with increased purchasing power to purchase
replacement snow and ice control equipment prior to the following winter. To a lesser extent, sales of
our products are influenced by the timing of snowfall in a given winter. Because an early snowfall can
be viewed as a sign of a heavy upcoming snow season, our end-users may respond to an early snowfall
by purchasing replacement snow and ice control equipment during the current season rather that
delaying purchases until after the season is over when most purchases are typically made by end-users.
The following chart illustrates the effects of snowfall levels in the snowbelt states in a given winter
on the number of units of snow and ice control equipment we shipped in the following year. Snowfall
levels represent the aggregate number of inches of snowfall recorded in each of 66 cities in 26 snowbelt
states across the Northeast, East, Midwest and Western United States where we have historically
monitored snowfall levels. We have historically monitored snowfall levels in these cities because they
represent the key metropolitan areas in the states where snowfall is a regular occurrence and coincide
with our historical U.S. market. With respect to the calculation of units shipped, each year in the
following chart represents the calendar year period from January 1 to December 31. With respect to
the calculation of snowfall, each year in the following chart represents the period beginning on
October 1 of the prior year and extending through the following March 31. Thus, for example, the
number of units shipped in 2001 represents the total units of snow and ice control equipment we
40
shipped from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2001, whereas the 2001 snowfall level reflects snowfall
in the snowbelt states in the period from October 1, 2000 through March 31, 2001. As the chart
indicates, heavy snowfall levels in a given winter tend to lead to increased unit shipments of our snow
and ice control equipment in the following year, whereas low snowfall levels in a given winter tend to
lead to decreased units shipped of our snow and ice control equipment in the following year. Over the
past 10 years, our sales of snow and ice control equipment ranged from a low of 40,538 units to a high
of 66,043 units, averaging 50,504 units per year (including units sold by Blizzard Corporation prior to
its acquisition by us in November 2005).
Equipment Sales Versus Snowfall
100,000
s
t
i
n
U
80,000
60,000
40,000
20,000
-
6,000
5,000
4.000
3,000
2,000
1,000
-
I
n
c
h
e
s
2 0 0 2
2 0 0 3
2 0 0 4
2 0 0 5
2 0 0 6
2 0 0 7
Snowfall
2 0 0 9
2 0 1 0
2 0 1 1
2 0 0 8
Units
8MAR201215570348
Note: This chart is not weighted or adjusted to account for new distributors or increased market size,
but does include unit sales attributable to new distributors. Further, snowfall data in this chart is
not adjusted for snowfall outside of the 66 cities in the 26 states reflected. Units of equipment
sales for years 2002 through 2005 are adjusted to include units sold by Blizzard Corporation prior
to its acquisition by us in November 2005.
Source of snowfall data: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Weather Service
Snowfall levels in any given rolling eight-year period have been relatively constant. See ‘‘Business—
Our Industry.’’
We attempt to manage the seasonal impact of snowfall on our revenues in part through our
pre-season sales program, which involves actively soliciting and encouraging pre-season distributor
orders in the second and third quarters by offering our distributors a combination of pricing, payment
and freight incentives during this period. These pre-season sales incentives encourage our distributors
to re-stock their inventory during the second and third quarters in anticipation of the peak fourth
quarter retail sales period by offering favorable pre-season pricing and payment deferral until the
fourth quarter. As a result, we tend to generate our greatest volume of sales (an average of over
two-thirds over the last ten years) during the second and third quarters, providing us with
manufacturing visibility for the remainder of the year. By contrast, our revenue and operating results
tend to be lowest during the first quarter as management believes our end-users prefer to wait until the
beginning of a snow season to purchase new equipment and as our distributors sell off inventory and
wait for our pre-season sales incentive period to re-stock inventory. Fourth quarter sales vary from
41
year-to-year as they are primarily driven by the level, timing and location of snowfall during the
quarter. This is because most of our fourth quarter sales and shipments consist of re-orders by
distributors seeking to restock inventory to meet immediate customer needs caused by snowfall during
the winter months.
Our revenue and operating results tend to be lowest during the first quarter, during which period
we typically experience negative earnings as the snow season draws to a close. Our first quarter revenue
has varied from approximately $8.5 million to approximately $23.5 million between 2007 and 2011.
During the last five-year period, net loss during the first quarter has varied from a net loss of
approximately $0.8 million to a net loss of approximately $6.5 million, with an average net loss of
$4.1 million.
While our monthly working capital has averaged approximately $90 million from 2009 to 2011,
because of the seasonality of our sales, we experience seasonality in our working capital needs as well.
In the first quarter we require capital as we are generally required to build our inventory in
anticipation of our second and third quarter sales seasons. During the second and third quarters, our
working capital requirements rise as our accounts receivables increase as a result of the sale and
shipment of products ordered through our pre-season sales program and we continue to build
inventory. Working capital requirements peak towards the end of the third quarter (reaching an
average peak of approximately $73.0 million over the prior three years) and then begin to decline
through the fourth quarter through a reduction in accounts receivables (as it is in the fourth quarter
that we receive a majority of the payments for previously shipped products).
We also attempt to manage the impact of seasonality and year-to-year variability on our business
costs through the effective management of our assets. See ‘‘Business—Our Business Strategy—
Aggressive Asset Management and Profit Focus.’’ Our asset management and profit focus strategies
include:
(cid:127) the employment of a highly variable cost structure facilitated by a core group of workers that we
supplement with a temporary workforce as sales volumes dictate, which allows us to adjust costs
on an as-needed basis in response to changing demand;
(cid:127) our enterprise-wide lean concept, which allows us to adjust production levels up or down to
meet demand;
(cid:127) the pre-season order program described above, which incentivizes distributors to place orders
prior to the retail selling season; and
(cid:127) a vertically integrated business model.
These asset management and profit focus strategies, among other management tools, allow us to
adjust fixed overhead and sales, general and administrative expenditures to account for the year-to-year
variability of our sales volumes. Management currently estimates that annual fixed overhead expenses
generally range from approximately $14.0 million in low sales volume years to approximately
$16.0 million in high sales volume years. Further, management currently estimates that annual sales,
general and administrative expenses other than amortization generally approximate $20.0 million, but
can be reduced to approximately $17.0 million to maximize cash flow in low sales volume years, and
can increase to approximately $24.0 million to maintain customer service and responsiveness in high
sales volume years.
Additionally, although modest, our annual capital expenditure requirements, which are normally
budgeted at $3.5 million, can be temporarily reduced by up to approximately 40% in response to actual
or anticipated decreases in sales volumes. If we are unsuccessful in our asset management initiatives,
the seasonality and year-to-year variability effects on our business may be compounded and in turn our
results of operations and financial condition may suffer.
42
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We do not use financial instruments for speculative trading purposes, and do not hold any
derivative financial instruments that could expose us to significant market risk. Our primary market risk
exposures are changes in interest rates and steel price fluctuations.
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to market risk primarily from changes in interest rates. Our borrowings, including
our term loan and any revolving borrowings under our senior credit facilities, are at variable rates of
interest and expose us to interest rate risk. A portion of our interest rate risk associated with our term
loan is mitigated through an interest rate swap as discussed in Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements. In addition, the interest rate on any revolving borrowings is subject to an increase in the
interest rate based on our average daily availability under our revolving credit facility.
As of December 31, 2011, we had outstanding borrowings under our term loan of $122.9 million.
A hypothetical interest rate change of 1%, 1.5% and 2% on our term loan would have changed interest
incurred for the year ended December 31, 2011 by $0.1 million, $0.2 million and $0.7 million,
respectively. We have entered into an interest rate swap, which became effective beginning July 2011
and matures December 2014, to hedge the variability in future cash flows associated with our
variable-rate term loans. The swap converts $50.0 million of our term loan to a fixed interest rate of
2.085%. As of December 31, 2011, we had no outstanding borrowings under our revolving credit
facility.
Commodity Price Risk
In the normal course of business, we are exposed to market risk related to our purchase of steel,
the primary commodity upon which our manufacturing depends. While steel is typically available from
numerous suppliers, the price of steel is a commodity subject to fluctuations that apply across broad
spectrums of the steel market. We do not use any derivative or hedging instruments to manage the
price risk. If the price of steel increases, our variable costs could also increase. While historically we
have successfully mitigated these increased costs through the implementation of either permanent price
increases and/or temporary invoice surcharges, in the future we may not be able to successfully mitigate
these costs, which could cause our gross margins to decline. If our costs for steel were to increase by
$1.00 in a period in which we were not able to pass any of this increase onto our distributors, our gross
margins would decline by $1.00 in that period.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The financial statements are included in this report beginning on page F-3.
Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures
None
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, we carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures (the ‘‘Evaluation’’) as of the last day of the period covered by this report.
43
Based upon the Evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded
that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective of the last day of the period covered by this
report. Disclosure controls and procedures are defined by Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Exchange Act’’) as controls and other procedures that are
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit
under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified by the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation,
controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the
reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
It should be noted that the design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain
assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will
succeed in achieving our stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting. Our internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to our
management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of our published
financial statements.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore,
even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to
financial statement preparation and presentation.
Our management with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2011. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (‘‘COSO’’) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework. Based
on its, management believes that, as of December 31, 2011, our internal control over financial reporting
was effective based on those criteria.
Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the
Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and, as part of its
audit, has issued an attestation report, included herein, on the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During the last fiscal quarter, of the period covered by this report, there were no changes in our
internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to
materially affect such controls.
Item 9B. Other Information
None
44
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
PART III
The information included under the captions ‘‘Election of Directors,’’ ‘‘Board of Directors and
Corporate Governance’’ and ‘‘Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance’’ in the
Company’s definitive proxy statement, which is expected to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within
120 days following the end of the fiscal year covered by this report (the ‘‘Proxy Statement’’), is hereby
incorporated by reference. The information required by Item 10 with respect to our Executive Officers
is included in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our principal executive
officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer, as well as all of our employees. We
have posted a copy of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics on our website at
www.douglasdynamics.com. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is also available in print to any
stockholder who requests it in writing from the Corporate Secretary at 7777 North 73rd Street,
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53223. We intend to post on our website any amendments to, or waivers (with
respect to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and controller) from, the Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics within four business days of any such amendment or waiver. We are not
including the information contained on our website as part of, or incorporating it by reference into, this
report.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required in Item 11 is incorporated by reference to the information in the Proxy
Statement under the captions ‘‘Corporate Governance—Compensation Committee Interlocks and
Insider Participation,’’ ‘‘Compensation Discussion and Analysis’’, ‘‘Executive Compensation,’’ ‘‘Director
Compensation’’ and ‘‘Compensation Committee Report.’’
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder
Matters
The information required in Item 12 is incorporated by reference to the information in the Proxy
Statement under the captions ‘‘Corporate Governance—Significant Stockholders’’ and ‘‘—Executive
Officers and Directors.’’
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required in Item 13 is incorporated by reference to the information in the Proxy
Statement under the caption ‘‘Corporate Governance.’’
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The information required in Item 14 is incorporated by reference to the information in the Proxy
Statement under the caption ‘‘Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm.’’
45
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a) Documents filed as part of this report:
1. Consolidated Financial Statements:
See ‘‘Index to Consolidated Financial Statements’’ on page F-1, the Reports of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on page F-2 and F-3 and the Consolidated
Financial Statements beginning on page F-4, all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
2.
Financial Statement Schedule:
All schedules have been omitted because the information required in these schedules is
included in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
3. Exhibits:
See ‘‘Exhibit Index’’ of this Form 10-K, which is incorporated herein by reference.
46
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, on this 13th day of March, 2012.
Signatures
DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC.
By:
/s/ JAMES JANIK
James L. Janik
President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed
below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on March 13,
2012.
/s/ JAMES L. JANIK
James L. Janik
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer) and Director
/s/ ROBERT L. MCCORMICK
Robert L. McCormick
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
/s/ ROBERT J. YOUNG
Robert J. Young
/s/ KENNETH W. KRUEGER
Kenneth W. Krueger
/s/ JAMES L. PACKARD
James L. Packard
/s/ JACK O. PEIFFER
Jack O. Peiffer
/s/ JAMES D. STALEY
James D. Staley
/s/ DONALD W. STURDIVANT
Donald W. Sturdivant
/s/ MICHAEL W. WICKHAM
Michael W. Wickham
47
Corporate Controller and Treasurer (Controller)
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Exhibit
Number
3.1
3.2
10.1
10.2
Exhibit Index
Title
Fourth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
[Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to Douglas Dynamics, Inc.’s Registration Statement
on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-164590)].
Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of Douglas Dynamics, Inc. [Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.6 to Douglas Dynamics, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-164590)].
Amended and Restated Credit and Guaranty Agreement dated as of April 18, 2011 among
Douglas Dynamics, L.L.C. Douglas Dynamics Finance Company and Fisher LLC as
borrowers, Douglas Dynamics, Inc., as guarantor, the banks and financial institutions listed
therein as lenders, J.P.Morgan Securities LLC, as sole bookrunner and sole lead arranger,
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent, and Wells Fargo
Capital Finance, LLC, as syndication agent [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 20, 2011 (File
No. 001-34728)].
Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of April 18, 2011, among Douglas Dynamics,
L.L.C., as borrower, Douglas Dynamics, Inc., Douglas Dynamics Finance Company and
Fisher, LLC, as guarantors, the banks and financial institutions listed therein, as lenders,
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, as joint bookrunners
and joint lead arrangers, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as collateral agent and administrative
agent, and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, as syndication agent Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Douglas Dynamics, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
April 20, 2011 (File No. 001-34728)].
10.3# Employment Agreement between Robert McCormick and Douglas Dynamics, Inc., dated
September 7, 2004, as amended by that certain amendment, dated as of October 1, 2008
[Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Douglas Dynamics, Inc.’s Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-164590)].
10.4# Form of Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement between Robert McCormick and
Douglas Dynamics, Inc. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Douglas
Dynamics, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-164590)].
10.5# Employment Agreement between James L. Janik and Douglas Dynamics, Inc., dated
March 30, 2004 [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Douglas Dynamics, Inc.’s
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-164590)].
10.6# Form of Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement between James L. Janik and Douglas
Dynamics, Inc. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Douglas Dynamics, Inc.’s
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-164590)].
10.7# Employment Agreement between Mark Adamson and Douglas Dynamics, Inc., dated
August 27, 2007 [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Douglas Dynamics, Inc.’s
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-164590)].
10.9# Form of Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement between Mark Adamson and
Douglas Dynamics, Inc. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Douglas
Dynamics, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-164590)].
48
Exhibit
Number
Title
10.10# Douglas Dynamics, Inc. Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan [Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.16 to Douglas Dynamics, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-164590)].
10.11# Form of Amended and Restated Management Incentive Option Agreement under Douglas
Dynamics, Inc. Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan [Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.18 to Douglas Dynamics, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-164590)].
10.12# Form of Management Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
2004 Stock Incentive Plan [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to Douglas
Dynamics, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-164590)].
10.13# Form of Amended and Restated Management Non-Qualified Option Agreement under
Douglas Dynamics, Inc. Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan [Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.20 to Douglas Dynamics, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-164590)].
10.14# Form of Non-Employee Director Non-Qualified Option Agreement under Douglas
Dynamics, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration
No. 333-164590)].
10.15# Form of Amended and Restated Non-Employee Director Non-Qualified Option Agreement
under Douglas Dynamics, Inc. Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan
[Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to Douglas Dynamics, Inc.’s Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-164590)].
10.16# Amended and Restated Management Incentive Option Agreement under Douglas
Dynamics, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan between Douglas Dynamics, Inc. and James L.
Janik, dated March 31, 2004 [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to Douglas
Dynamics, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-164590)].
10.17# Form of Second Amended and Restated Management Incentive Option Agreement under
Douglas Dynamics, Inc. Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan between Douglas
Dynamics, Inc. and James L. Janik [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to Douglas
Dynamics, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-164590)].
10.18# Amended and Restated Non-Qualified Option Agreement under Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
2004 Stock Incentive Plan between Douglas Dynamics, Inc. and James L. Janik, dated
March 31, 2004 [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to Douglas Dynamics, Inc.’s
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-164590)].
10.19# Form of Second Amended and Restated Non-Qualified Option Agreement under Douglas
Dynamics, Inc. Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan between Douglas
Dynamics, Inc. and James L. Janik [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to Douglas
Dynamics, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-164590)].
10.20# Form of Amended and Restated Deferred Stock Unit Agreement [Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.27 to Douglas Dynamics, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-164590)].
10.21# Douglas Dynamics 2011 Annual Incentive Plan [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-34728)].
49
Exhibit
Number
Title
10.22# Douglas Dynamics, L.L.C. Long Term Incentive Plan 2009 [Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.30 to Douglas Dynamics, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration
No. 333-164590)].
10.23# Douglas Dynamics, Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive Plan [Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.32 to Douglas Dynamics, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration
No. 333-164590)].
10.24# Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under Douglas Dynamics, Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive
Plan [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to Douglas Dynamics, Inc.’s Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-164590)].
10.25# Alternative Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under Douglas Dynamics, Inc. 2010 Stock
Incentive Plan [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to Douglas Dynamics, Inc.’s
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-164590)].
10.26# Form of Restricted Stock Units Agreement under Douglas Dynamics, Inc. 2010 Stock
Incentive Plan [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to Douglas Dynamics, Inc.’s
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-164590)].
10.27# Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement under Douglas Dynamics, Inc. 2010 Stock
Incentive Plan [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to Douglas Dynamics, Inc.’s
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-164590)].
10.28# Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under 2010 Stock Incentive Plan [Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to Douglas Dynamics, Inc.’s Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-164590)].
10.29# Form of Restricted Stock Grant Notice and Standard Terms and Conditions under the
Douglas Dynamics, Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive Plan [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to Douglas Dynamics, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 30, 2010 (File
No. 001-34728)].
10.30# Form of Restricted Stock Unit Grant Notice and Standard Terms and Conditions under the
Douglas Dynamics, Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive Plan [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to Douglas Dynamics, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 30, 2010 (File
No. 001-34728)].
10.31# Form of Nonemployee Director Restricted Stock Unit Grant Notice and Standard Terms and
Conditions under the Douglas Dynamics, Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive Plan [Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Douglas Dynamics, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
December 30, 2010 (File No. 001-34728)].
10.32# Form of Second Amended and Restated Joint Management Services Agreement among
Douglas Dynamics, Inc., Douglas Dynamics, L.L.C., Aurora Management Partners LLC, and
ACOF Management, L.P. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.42 to Douglas
Dynamics, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-164590)].
10.33# Form of Director and Officer Indemnification Agreement [Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.43 to Douglas Dynamics, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration
No. 333-164590)].
10.34#* Douglas Dynamics Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan
21.1*
Subsidiaries of Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
50
Exhibit
Number
Title
23.1*
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.
31.1*
31.2*
32.1*
99.1
101.1
101.2
101.3
101.4
101.5
101.6
Certification of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Proxy Statement for the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders [To be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission under Regulation 14A within 120 days after
December 31, 2011; except to the extent specifically incorporated by reference, the Proxy
Statement for the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders shall not be deemed to be filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K]
XBRL Instance Document
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
# A management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
*
Filed herewith.
51
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Financial Statements
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Balance Sheets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Statements of Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Page
F-2
F-4
F-5
F-6
F-7
F-8
F-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Douglas Dynamics, Inc. (the
Company) as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income,
changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2011. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects,
the consolidated financial position of Douglas Dynamics, Inc. at December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the
consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2011, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), Douglas Dynamics, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated
March 13, 2012 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
March 13, 2012
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
F-2
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
We have audited Douglas Dynamics, Inc.’s (the Company) internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria).
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial
reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained
in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over
financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal
control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the
maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and
dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only
in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or
disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject
to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Douglas Dynamics, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Douglas Dynamics, Inc. as of
December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011
and our report dated March 13, 2012, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/Ernst & Young LLP
Milwaukee, WI
March 13, 2012
F-3
DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
December 31,
2011
December 31,
2010
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts receivable, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 39,432
34,019
24,005
4,952
—
1,054
Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
103,462
Property, plant, and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Assets held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other intangible assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred financing costs, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other long-term assets
21,340
1,732
107,222
121,747
3,402
112
$ 20,149
37,040
23,481
7,142
29
1,131
88,972
21,962
1,779
107,222
126,948
953
207
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$359,017
$348,043
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued interest
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income taxes payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Current portion of long-term debt
$ 5,040
15,755
350
395
11,071
Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
32,611
Retiree health benefit obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pension obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term debt, less current portion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8,053
14,163
26,957
912
111,866
1,066
$
2,847
11,923
23
—
1,183
15,976
7,235
10,753
22,650
1,067
119,971
898
Shareholders’ equity:
Common Stock, par value $0.01, 200,000,000 shares authorized, 22,020,694
and 21,579,655 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
220
216
Additional paid-in capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Shareholders’ notes receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
130,907
—
39,742
(7,480)
Total shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
163,389
127,695
(482)
46,495
(4,431)
169,493
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$359,017
$348,043
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-4
DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
2011
2010
2009
Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$208,798
136,981
$176,795
116,494
$174,342
117,264
Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
71,817
Selling, general, and administrative expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Intangibles amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Management fees-related party . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income from operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss on extinguishment of debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other income (expense), net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
26,389
5,201
46
40,181
(8,918)
(673)
(218)
60,301
26,509
6,001
6,383
21,408
57,078
20,085
6,161
1,393
29,439
(10,943)
(7,967)
36
(15,520)
—
(90)
Income before taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
30,372
2,534
13,829
Income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
11,332
872
3,986
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 19,040
$
1,662
$
9,843
Less: Net income attributable to participating securities . . . . . . . . . . .
233
12
—
Net income attributable to common shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 18,807
$
1,650
$
9,843
Earnings per share:
Basic earnings per common share attributable to common
shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Earnings per common share assuming dilution attributable to
common shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash dividends declared and paid per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
$
0.87
0.85
1.18
$
$
$
0.09
0.09
0.38
$
$
$
0.68
0.67
0.00
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-5
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC.
(Dollars In Thousands)
Redeemable Securities
Series A
Redeemable
Preferred
Stock
Series B
Redeemable
Preferred
Series C
Redeemable
Preferred
Shares Dollars Shares Dollars Shares Dollars
Additional Shareholders’
Accumulated
Other
Common Stock
Paid-in
Shares Dollars Capital
Notes
Retained Comprehensive
Receivable Earnings
Loss
Total
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Balance at December 31, 2008
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. —
$—
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Net income .
.
.
Adjustment for pension and postretirement benefit liability, net of
.
.
.
.
.
.
Interest on shareholders’ notes receivable .
.
Stock repurchases and retirement .
tax of $365 .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. —
. —
. —
. —
—
—
—
—
F
-
6
Balance at December 31, 2009
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. —
$—
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Net income .
.
Dividends paid .
.
.
Adjustment for pension and postretirement benefit liability, net of
.
.
.
.
.
Interest on shareholders’ notes receivable .
tax of $327 .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. —
. —
. —
. —
Issuance and sales of common stock by Company through IPO .
. —
Issuance of non-vested common stock in connection with IPO .
.
. —
Shares issued for options exercised in connection with IPO .
. —
Fractional shares repurchased and retired in connection with IPO . —
. —
.
Stock repurchases and retirement .
. —
.
.
Deferred stock units converted .
. —
.
.
.
Stock option exercises .
.
. —
.
.
.
Stock based compensation .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Balance at December 31, 2010
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. —
$—
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
tax of $1,560 .
.
.
Net income .
.
Dividends paid .
.
.
Adjustment for pension and postretirement benefit liability, net of
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Adjustment for interest rate swap, net of tax of $230 .
.
Interest on shareholders’ notes receivable .
.
.
Repayment of shareholders’ note receivable .
.
.
Shares issued for options exercised .
.
.
.
Stock based compensation .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. —
. —
. —
. —
. —
. —
. —
. —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Balance at December 31, 2011
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. —
$—
1
—
—
—
—
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(1)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$ 1
—
—
—
—
$ 1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(1)
—
—
—
$—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$—
1
—
—
—
—
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(1)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$ 1
14,454,369
$144
$ 60,378
$(1,116)
$ 43,212
$(4,559)
$ 98,059
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(32,633) —
—
—
(405)
—
—
(34)
137
9,843
—
—
—
—
622
—
—
9,843
$ 9,843
622
(34)
(268)
622
—
—
$ 1
14,421,736
$144
$ 59,973
$(1,013)
$ 53,055
$(3,937)
$108,222
$10,465
—
—
—
—
65
2
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
— 6,500,000
—
—
—
(1)
—
—
—
208,130
180,567
2
(7) —
174,229
95,000
—
2
1
—
—
—
—
—
63,864
(2)
1,659
—
(2)
1,067
1,136
—
—
—
(28)
—
—
—
—
559
—
—
—
1,662
(8,222)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(494)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,662
(8,222)
$ 1,662
—
(494)
(28)
63,929
—
1,661
—
559
—
1,068
1,136
(494)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$— 21,579,655
$216
$127,695
$ (482)
$ 46,495
$(4,431)
$169,493
$ 1,168
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
319,383
121,656
—
—
—
—
—
—
3
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,340
1,872
—
—
—
—
(7)
489
—
—
19,040
(25,793)
—
—
19,040
(25,793)
19,040
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(2,658)
(391)
—
—
—
—
(2,658)
(391)
(7)
489
1,343
1,873
(2,658)
(391)
—
—
—
—
$— 22,020,694
$220
$130,907
$ —
$ 39,742
$(7,480)
$163,389
$15,991
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In Thousands)
Operating activities
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 19,040
$
1,662
$ 9,843
2011
2010
2009
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount . . . . . .
Loss on extinguishment of debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for losses on accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid and other assets and prepaid income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Benefit obligations and other long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8,176
832
673
1,873
47
6,497
2,974
(524)
201
2,193
4,554
(155)
1,347
11,705
872
7,967
4,029
445
641
(5,313)
3,216
1,437
(2,323)
(7,201)
(415)
(945)
11,958
1,209
—
732
133
1,810
(3,717)
2,105
(776)
218
1,127
(162)
1,091
Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
47,728
15,777
25,571
Investing activities
Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sale of equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash used in investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financing activities
Stock repurchases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from exercise of stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payment of call premium and post payoff interest on senior notes
redemption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Collection of shareholders’ notes receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payments of financing costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from initial public offering, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Borrowings on long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Repayment of long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(2,373)
67
(2,306)
—
1,343
(3,009)
226
(8,200)
—
(2,783)
(8,200)
(166)
—
(1,000)
—
—
482
(3,471)
—
123,750
(25,793)
(122,450)
(3,876)
531
(2,605)
63,929
40,000
(8,222)
(151,509)
—
—
—
—
—
—
(850)
Net cash used in financing activities
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(26,139)
(61,918)
(1,850)
Change in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
19,283
20,149
(48,924)
69,073
15,521
53,552
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 39,432
$ 20,149
$69,073
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Income taxes paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
2,479
7,767
$
1,663
$ 16,886
$ 1,895
$14,410
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-7
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
(Dollars in Thousands Except Per Share Data)
1. Description of business and basis of presentation
Douglas Dynamics, Inc., (the ‘‘Company’’) is the North American leader in the design,
manufacture and sale of snow and ice control equipment for light trucks, which is comprised of
snowplows and sand and salt spreaders, and related parts and accessories. The Company’s snow and ice
control products are sold through a network of over 720 truck equipment distributors that purchase
directly from the Company and are located throughout the snowbelt regions in North America
(primarily the Midwest, East and Northeast regions of the United States as well as all provinces of
Canada). The Company sells its products under the WESTERN(cid:3), FISHER(cid:3), and BLIZZARD(cid:3)
brands. The Company is headquartered in Milwaukee, WI and currently has manufacturing facilities in
Milwaukee, WI, and Rockland, ME. The Company closed its Johnson City, TN facility in August 2010.
The Company operates as a single segment.
On May 20, 2011 and December 6, 2011, certain of the stockholders of the Company, including
affiliates of Aurora Capital Group and Ares Management, closed registered secondary offerings of
5,750,000 and 1,996,479 shares, respectively, of the Company’s common stock. The Company did not
receive any proceeds from the sale of its stock by the selling stockholders in the offerings.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Douglas
Dynamics, Inc. and its direct wholly-owned subsidiary, Douglas Dynamics, L.L.C., and its indirect
wholly-owned subsidiaries, Douglas Dynamics Finance Company (an inactive subsidiary) and
Fisher, LLC (hereinafter collectively referred to as the ‘‘Company’’). All intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of estimates
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.
Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three
months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair
value.
Accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts
The Company carries its accounts receivable at their face amount less an allowance for doubtful
accounts. The majority of the Company’s accounts receivable are due from distributors of truck
equipment. Credit is extended based on an evaluation of a customer’s financial condition. On a
F-8
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
(Dollars in Thousands Except Per Share Data)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
periodic basis, the Company evaluates its accounts receivable and establishes the allowance for doubtful
accounts based on a combination of specific customer circumstances and credit conditions based on a
history of write-offs and collections. A receivable is considered past due if payments have not been
received within agreed upon invoice terms. Accounts receivable are written off after all collection
efforts have been exhausted. The Company takes a security interest in the inventory as collateral for
the receivable but often does not have a priority security interest.
Financing program
The Company is party to a financing program in which certain distributors may elect to finance
their purchases from the Company through a third party financing company. The Company provides
the third party financing company recourse against the Company regarding the collectability of the
receivable under the program due to the fact that if the third party financing company is unable to
collect from the distributor the amounts due in respect of the product financed, the Company would be
obligated to repurchase any remaining inventory related to the product financed and reimburse any
legal fees incurred by the financing company. During the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and
2009, distributors financed purchases of $2,752, $1,696 and $3,269 through this financing program,
respectively. At December 31, 2011 there were $55 of uncollectible outstanding receivables related to
sales financed under the financing program, all of which is fully reserved for in the allowance for
doubtful accounts. There were no outstanding or uncollectible amounts related to sales financed under
the financing program for the years ended December 31, 2010. The amount owed by our distributors to
the third party financing company under this program at December 31, 2011 and 2010 was $1,714 and
$1,267, respectively. The Company was required to repurchase repossessed inventory of $41, $91 and
$19 for the years ended December 31, 2011, December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
In the past, minimal losses have been incurred under this agreement. However, an adverse change
in distributor retail sales could cause this situation to change and thereby require the Company to
repurchase repossessed units. Any repossessed units are inspected to ensure they are current, unused
product and are restocked and resold.
Interest Rate Swap
As required by the new debt agreement the Company entered into in the second quarter of 2011,
the Company entered into an interest-rate swap agreement to hedge against the potential impact on
earnings from increases in market interest rates. Under the interest rate swap agreement, effective as of
July 18, 2011 the Company either receives or makes payments on a monthly basis based on the
differential between 6.335% and LIBOR plus 4.25% (with a LIBOR floor of 1.5%). See
Comprehensive income (loss) for treatment of gains and losses on the interest rate swap agreement.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Market is determined based on estimated
realizable values. Inventory costs are primarily determined by the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. The
F-9
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
(Dollars in Thousands Except Per Share Data)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Company periodically reviews our inventory for slow moving, damaged and discontinued items and
provides reserves to reduce such items identified to their recoverable amounts.
Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is
computed using straight-line methods over the estimated useful lives for financial statement purposes
and an accelerated method for income tax reporting purposes. The estimated useful lives of the assets
are as follows:
Land improvements and buildings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Machinery and equipment
Furniture and fixtures
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mobile equipment and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Years
15 - 40
3 - 20
3 - 12
3 - 10
Depreciation expense was $2,975, $5,704, and $5,797 for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010
and 2009, respectively.
Expenditures for renewals and improvements that significantly add to the productive capacity or
extend the useful life of an asset are capitalized. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged
to operations when incurred. Repairs and maintenance expenses amounted to $4,025, $2,909 and $3,079
for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. When assets are sold or retired,
the cost of the asset and the related accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the accounts and
any gain or loss is recognized in the results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets
Long-lived assets are reviewed for potential impairment when events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be
held and used is measured by comparison of the carrying value of such assets to the undiscounted
future cash flows expected to be generated by the assets. If the carrying value of an asset exceeds its
estimated undiscounted future cash flows, an impairment provision is recognized to the extent that the
carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower
of the carrying amount or the fair value of the asset, less costs of disposition. Management of the
Company considers such factors as current results, trends and future prospects, current market value,
and other economic and regulatory factors in performing these analyses. The Company determined that
no long-lived assets were impaired as of December 31, 2011 and 2010.
Goodwill and other intangible assets
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment annually in the fourth
quarter, or sooner if impairment indicators arise. The fair value of indefinite-lived intangible assets is
estimated based upon a market approach. In reviewing goodwill for impairment, potential impairment
is identified by comparing the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value. The
F-10
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
(Dollars in Thousands Except Per Share Data)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Company has determined it has one reporting unit. When the fair value is less than the carrying value
of the net assets of the reporting unit, including goodwill, an impairment loss may be recognized. The
Company has determined that goodwill and indefinite lived assets were not impaired as of
December 31, 2011 and 2010.
Intangible assets with estimable useful lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful
lives and also reviewed at least annually for impairment or as events or circumstances arise. The
Company amortizes its distribution network intangible over periods ranging from 15 to 20 years,
trademarks over 7 to 10 years, patents over 7 to 20 years, and noncompete agreements over 5 years.
The Company has determined that finite lived intangible assets were not impaired as of December 31,
2011 and 2010.
Income taxes
Deferred income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method whereby deferred tax
assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between
the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates. Deferred income tax provisions
or benefits are based on the change in the deferred tax assets and liabilities from period to period.
Deferred income tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some
portion of the deferred income tax asset will not be realized. Additionally, when applicable, the
Company would classify interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense.
Deferred financing costs
The costs of obtaining financing are capitalized and amortized over the term of the related
financing on a basis that approximates the effective interest method. The changes in deferred financing
costs are as follows:
Balance at January 1, 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of deferred financing costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 4,520
(1,209)
Balance at December 31, 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred financing costs capitalized on new debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of deferred financing costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance at December 31, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred financing costs capitalized on new debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of deferred financing costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3,311
(2,045)
559
(872)
953
(335)
3,471
(687)
Balance at December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 3,402
For the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company recorded the write-off of deferred financing
costs as a loss on extinguishment of debt, in the consolidated statements of operations as a result of an
F-11
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
(Dollars in Thousands Except Per Share Data)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
amendment to the Company’s term loan facility. The amendment of the term loan facility resulted in a
significant modification of the debt which resulted in the write off of unamortized capitalized deferred
financing costs of $335. See further details in Note 7. For the year ended December 31, 2010 the
Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $7,967 as a result of an amendment to the
Company’s term loan facility and the repayment of the senior notes as follows. The amendment of the
term loan facility resulted in a significant modification of the debt, which resulted in the write off of
unamortized deferred financing costs of $995. The Company also incurred expenditures of $2,045
related to financing costs paid to existing lenders. The Company wrote off $1,050 of unamortized
deferred financing costs related to the senior notes and paid $3,876 for a redemption call premium and
post payoff interest on the senior notes redemption.
Fair Value
Fair value is the price at which an asset could be exchanged in a current transaction between
knowledgeable, willing parties. A liability’s fair value is defined as the amount that would be paid to
transfer the liability to a new obligor, not the amount that would be paid to settle the liability with the
creditor. Fair value measurements are categorized into one of three levels based on the lowest level of
significant input used: Level 1 (unadjusted quoted prices in active markets); Level 2 (observable market
inputs available at the measurement date, other than quoted prices included in Level 1); and Level 3
(unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated by observable market data).
The following table presents financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis and discloses the fair value of long-term debt:
Assets:
Assets(a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Liabilities:
Fair Value
at
12/31/2011
Fair Value
at
12/31/2010
$
$
— $
— $
—
—
Long term debt(b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other non-current liabilities—Interest rate swap(c) . . . . . .
122,709
621
120,397
—
Total Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$123,330
$120,397
(a) The Company does not have any financial assets that are required to be measured at fair
value on a recurring basis.
(b) The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt, including current maturities, is estimated
using discounted cash flows based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates
for similar types of borrowing arrangements, which is a level 2 input for all periods
presented. Meanwhile, long-term debt is recorded at carrying amount, net of discount, as
disclosed on the face of the balance sheet.
F-12
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
(Dollars in Thousands Except Per Share Data)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
(c) Valuation models are calibrated to initial trade price. Subsequent valuations are based on
observable inputs to the valuation model (e.g. interest rates and credit spreads). Model
inputs are changed only when corroborated by market data. A credit risk adjustment is
made using observable market credit spreads. Thus, inputs used to determine fair value of
the interest rate swap are level 2 inputs.
Concentration of credit risk
The Company’s cash is deposited with multiple financial institutions. At times, deposits in these
institutions exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits. The Company has not
experienced any losses in such accounts and believes that it is not exposed to any significant risk on
these balances.
No distributor represented more than 10% of the Company’s net sales or accounts receivable
during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009.
Revenue recognition
The Company recognizes revenues upon shipment to the customer, which is when title passes and
all of the following conditions are satisfied: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (ii) the
price is fixed or determinable; (iii) collectability is reasonably assured; and (iv) the product has been
shipped and the Company has no further obligations. Customers have no right of return privileges.
Historically, product returns have not been material and are permitted on an exception basis only.
The Company offers a variety of discounts and sales incentives to our distributors. The estimated
liability for sales discounts and allowances is recorded at the time of sale as a reduction of net sales.
The liability is estimated based on the costs of the program, the planned duration of the program and
historical experience.
Cost of sales
Cost of sales includes all costs associated with the manufacture of the Company’s products,
including raw materials, purchased parts, freight, plant operating expenses, property insurance and
taxes, and plant depreciation. All payroll costs and employee benefits for the hourly workforce,
manufacturing management, and engineering costs are included in cost of sales.
Warranty cost recognition
The Company accrues for estimated warranty costs as revenue is recognized. See note 9 for further
details.
Advertising expenses
Advertising expenses include costs for the production of marketing media, literature, CD-ROM,
and displays. The Company participates in trade shows and advertises in the yellow pages and
billboards. Advertising expenses amounted to $2,718, $2,805 and $2,528 for the years ended
F-13
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
(Dollars in Thousands Except Per Share Data)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The Company also provides its distributors with
pre-approved, cooperative advertising programs, which are recorded as advertising expense in selling,
general and administrative expense. All costs associated with the Company’s advertising programs are
expensed as incurred.
Shipping and handling costs
Generally, shipping and handling costs are paid directly by the customer to the shipping agent.
Those shipping and handling costs billed by the Company are recorded as a component of sales with
the corresponding costs included in cost of sales.
Share-based payments
The Company applies the guidance codified in ASC 718—Compensation—Stock Compensation.
This standard requires the measurement of the cost of employee services received in exchange for an
award of equity instruments based on the fair value of the award at the grant date and recognition of
the compensation expense over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in
exchange for the award (generally the vesting period). Because the Company used the minimum-value
method to measure compensation cost for employee stock options prior to January 1, 2006 the date on
which ASC 718 was adopted, under this previous guidance, it was required to use the prospective
method of adoption for this standard. Under the prospective method, the Company continues to
account for non-vested awards outstanding at the date of adoption using the same method as prior to
adoption for financial statement recognition purposes. All awards granted, modified, or settled after the
date of adoption are accounted for using the measurement, recognition, and attribution provisions of
ASC 718.
Comprehensive income (loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as the change in equity (net assets) of a business
enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner
resources and is comprised of net income or loss and ‘‘other comprehensive income (loss)’’. The
Company’s other comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of the adjustments for pension and
postretirement benefit liabilities as well as the impact of our interest rate swap. The interest rate swap
contract on $50,000 notional amount of the term loan expires in December 2014. The Company does
not expect to record any unrecognized loss into earnings in the next twelve months. Additionally, other
comprehensive income (loss) includes the net income (loss) of the Company plus/minus the Company’s
adjustments for its defined benefit retirement plans based on the measurement date as of the
Company’s year-end.
F-14
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
(Dollars in Thousands Except Per Share Data)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Components of accumulated other comprehensive loss are as follows:
Interest rate swap, net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrecognized pension and postretirement benefit plan liabilities,
December 31,
2011
2010
$ (391) $ —
net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(7,089)
(4,431)
$(7,480) $(4,431)
Segment Reporting
The Company operates in and reports as a single operating segment, which is the manufacture and
sale of snow and ice control products. Net sales are generated through the sale of snow and ice control
products and accessories to distributors. The chief operating decision maker (the Company’s Chief
Executive Officer) manages and evaluates its operations as one segment primarily due to similarities in
the nature of the products, production processes and methods of distribution. All of the Company’s
identifiable assets are located in the United States. The Company’s sales outside North America are
not material, representing less than 1% of net sales.
The Company’s product offerings primarily consist of snow and ice control products and
accessories. Equipment and parts and accessories are each a similar class of products based on similar
customer usage.
Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Parts and accessories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$177,806
30,992
$151,808
24,987
$147,478
26,864
Net Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$208,798
$176,795
$174,342
Year ended December 31,
2011
2010
2009
3. Related-Party Transactions
The Company was party to a Joint Management Services Agreement with Aurora Management
Partners, LLC (‘‘AMP’’) and ACOF Management, LP (‘‘ACOF’’), who were affiliates of its principal
stockholders at that time. Prior to the Company’s initial public offering (‘‘IPO’’) of its common stock in
May 2010, this agreement obligated the Company to pay an annual management fee of $1,250 per
annum, to AMP and ACOF, pro rata in accordance with their respective holdings, plus reimbursement
of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses, in exchange for consultation and advice in fields such as financial
services, accounting, general business management, acquisitions, dispositions and banking.
F-15
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
(Dollars in Thousands Except Per Share Data)
3. Related-Party Transactions (Continued)
In connection with the Company’s IPO, the Company amended and restated the terms of its Joint
Management Services Agreement to, among other things, (i) extend the term of service until the earlier
of (A) the fifth anniversary of the consummation of the Company’s IPO, (B) such time as AMP and
ACOF, together with their affiliates, collectively hold less than 5% of the Company’s outstanding
common stock and (C) such time as all parties mutually agree in writing, while eliminating all other
termination events (other than termination for cause); (ii) eliminate the annual management fee, as
well as the provision obligating the Company to pay AMP and ACOF a transaction fee in the event of
an acquisition or any sale or disposition of the Company or any of its divisions or any sale of
substantially all Company assets or similar transactions in exchange for a one-time fee of $5,800 upon
the consummation of the IPO, pro rata in accordance with their respective holdings; and (iii) modify
the expense reimbursement provisions to include reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in
connection with SEC and other legally required filings made by each of AMP and ACOF with respect
to the Company’s securities and certain other expenses. The one-time management fee was paid on
May 10, 2010, and is included in management fees—related party expense for the year ended
December 31, 2010.
On December 6, 2011, the Company completed a secondary offering by certain stockholders.
Immediately following the secondary offering, AMP and ACOF were no longer shareholders in the
Company.
The Company recognized management fees and related expense of $46, $6,383 and $1,393 for the
years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
4. Inventories
Inventories consist of the following:
Finished goods and work-in-process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Raw material and supplies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$22,630
1,375
$21,896
1,585
$24,005
$23,481
December 31,
2011
2010
F-16
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
(Dollars in Thousands Except Per Share Data)
5. Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment are summarized as follows:
December 31,
2011
2010
Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Land improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Buildings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Machinery and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Furniture and fixtures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mobile equipment and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction-in-process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
960
1,768
12,660
23,253
7,255
1,216
748
$
960
1,768
12,554
22,343
6,482
1,019
422
Total property, plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less accumulated depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
47,860
(26,520)
45,548
(23,586)
Net property, plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 21,340
$ 21,962
6. Other Intangible Assets
The following is a summary of the Company’s other intangible assets:
Gross
Carrying
Amount
Less
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Carrying
Amount
December 31, 2011:
Indefinite-lived intangibles:
Trademark and tradenames . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 60,000
$ — $ 60,000
Amortizable intangibles:
Dealer network . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Customer relations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Patents
Noncompete agreements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trademark—Blizzard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
License . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
80,000
2,000
15,116
5,050
3,100
20
31,000
822
4,735
5,050
1,912
20
49,000
1,178
10,381
—
1,188
—
Amortizable intangibles, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
105,286
43,539
61,747
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$165,286
$43,539
$121,747
F-17
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
(Dollars in Thousands Except Per Share Data)
6. Other Intangible Assets (Continued)
Gross
Carrying
Amount
Less
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Carrying
Amount
December 31, 2010:
Indefinite-lived intangibles:
Trademark and tradenames . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 60,000
$ — $ 60,000
Amortizable intangibles:
Dealer network . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Customer relations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Patents
Noncompete agreements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trademark—Blizzard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
License . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
80,000
2,000
15,116
5,050
3,100
20
27,000
689
3,977
5,050
1,602
20
53,000
1,311
11,139
—
1,498
—
Amortizable intangibles, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
105,286
38,338
66,948
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$165,286
$38,338
$126,948
Amortization expense for intangible assets was $5,201, $6,001 and $6,161 for the years ended
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Estimated amortization expense for the next five years
is as follows:
2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$5,199
5,193
5,193
5,142
4,883
The weighted average remaining life for intangible assets is 12.2 years.
7. Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt is summarized below:
Term Loan, net of debt discount of $1,125 and $358 at
December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively: . . .
$122,937
$121,154
Total long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less current maturities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
122,937
11,071
121,154
1,183
$111,866
$119,971
December 31,
2011
2010
F-18
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
(Dollars in Thousands Except Per Share Data)
7. Long-Term Debt (Continued)
The scheduled maturities on long-term debt at December 31, 2011, are as follows:
2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 11,071
1,071
1,071
1,071
1,071
107,582
$122,937
On April 18, 2011, the Company amended its senior credit facilities to, among other things,
(i) increase the borrowing ability under the revolving credit agreement by $10,000, and (ii) amend
certain of the provisions in its senior credit facilities which govern the Company’s ability to pay
dividends. Consequently, as of April 18, 2011, the Company’s senior credit facilities consisted of a
$125,000 term loan facility and a $70,000 revolving credit facility with a group of banks. The previous
term loans consisted of an initial term loan of $85,000 and a ‘‘tack on’’ of $40,000 and a $60,000
revolving credit facility. Prior to the April 2011 changes to the Company’s senior credit facilities, the
interest on the original $85,000 term loan facility was (at the Company’s option) either the base rate
(which shall be no less than 3%) plus 3.5% or the eurodollar rate (which shall be no less than 2%)
plus 4.5%. The interest for the additional $40,000 in the Company’s term loan facility was an interest
rate equal to (at the Company’s option) either the base rate (which shall be no less than 3%) plus 4%
or the eurodollar rate (which shall be no less than 2%) plus 5%. Under the previous revolving credit
facility, the margin for base rate loans was either 0.25% or 0.50% and the margin for eurodollar rate
loans was either 1.25% or 1.50%, in each case determined based on the Company’s leverage ratio from
time to time.
The agreement for the new term loan (the ‘‘Term Loan Credit Agreement’’) provides for a senior
secured term loan facility in the aggregate principal amount of $125,000 and generally bears interest at
(at the Company’s election) either (i) 3.25% per annum plus the greatest of (a) the Prime Rate (as
defined in the Term Loan Credit Agreement) in effect on such day, (b) the weighted average of the
rates on overnight Federal funds transactions with members of the Federal Reserve System arranged by
Federal funds brokers plus 0.50% and (c) 1.00% plus the greater of (1) the London Interbank Offered
Rate for a one month interest period multiplied by the Statutory Reserve Rate (as defined in the Term
Loan Credit Agreement) and (2) 1.50% or (ii) 4.25% per annum plus the greater of (a) the London
Interbank Offered Rate for the applicable interest period multiplied by the Statutory Reserve Rate and
(b) 1.50%. The revolving credit facility as amended and restated (the ‘‘Revolving Credit Agreement’’)
provides that the Company has the option to select whether borrowings will bear interest at either
(i) 2.25% per annum plus the London Interbank Offered Rate for the applicable interest period
multiplied by the Statutory Reserve Rate or (ii) 1.25% per annum plus the greatest of (a) the Prime
Rate in effect on such day, (b) the weighted average of the rates on overnight Federal funds
transactions with members of the Federal Reserve System arranged by Federal funds brokers plus
0.50% and (c) the London Interbank Offered Rate for a one month interest period multiplied by the
Statutory Reserve Rate plus 1%. The maturity date for the Company’s amended and restated revolving
F-19
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
(Dollars in Thousands Except Per Share Data)
7. Long-Term Debt (Continued)
credit facility is April 18, 2016, and the Company’s new term loan amortizes in nominal amounts
quarterly with the balance payable on April 18, 2018.
The new term loan entered into in the second quarter of 2011 was issued at a $1,250 discount
which is being amortized over the term of the new term loan.
The Company’s entry into the new term loan facility resulted in a significant modification of the
Company’s debt which resulted in the write off of unamortized capitalized deferred financing costs of
$335 and write off of unamortized debt discount of $338 which in total resulted in a loss on
extinguishment of debt of $673 in the Consolidated Statement of Income during the year ended
December 31,2011.
At December 31, 2011, the Company had no outstanding borrowings on the revolving credit facility
and remaining borrowing availability of $70,000.
The Company’s senior credit facilities include certain negative and operating covenants, including
restrictions on its ability to pay dividends, and other customary covenants, representations and
warranties and events of default. The senior credit facilities entered into and recorded by the
Company’s subsidiaries significantly restrict its subsidiaries from paying dividends and otherwise
transferring assets to Douglas Dynamics, Inc. The terms of the Company’s revolving credit facility
specifically restrict subsidiaries from paying dividends if a minimum availability under the revolving
credit facility is not maintained, and both senior credit facilities restrict subsidiaries from paying
dividends above certain levels or at all if an event of default has occurred. These restrictions would
affect the Company indirectly since the Company relies principally on distributions from its subsidiaries
to have funds available for the payment of dividends. In addition, the Company’s revolving credit
facility includes a requirement that, subject to certain exceptions, capital expenditures may not exceed
$10,000 in any calendar year and, if certain minimum availability under the revolving credit facility is
not maintained, that the Company comply with a monthly minimum fixed charge coverage ratio test of
1.0:1.0. Compliance with the fixed charge coverage ratio test is subject to certain cure rights under the
Company’s revolving credit facility. At December 31, 2011, the Company was in compliance with the
respective covenants. The credit facilities are collateralized by substantially all assets of the Company.
In accordance with the senior credit facilities, the Company is required to make additional
principal prepayments over the above scheduled payments under certain conditions. This includes, in
the case of the term loan facility, 100% of the net cash proceeds of certain asset sales, certain
insurance or condemnation events, certain debt issuances, and, within 150 days of the end of the fiscal
year, 50% of excess cash flow, as defined, including a deduction for certain distributions (which
percentage is reduced to 25% or 0% upon the achievement of certain leverage ratio thresholds), for
any fiscal year. Excess cash flow is defined in the senior credit facilities as consolidated adjusted
EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) plus a working capital
adjustment less the sum of repayments of debt and capital expenditures subject to certain adjustments,
interest and taxes paid in cash, management fees and certain restricted payments (including dividends
or distributions). Working capital adjustment is defined in the senior credit facilities as the change in
working capital, defined as current assets excluding cash and cash equivalents less current liabilities
excluding current portion of long term debt. As of December 31, 2011, the Company was not required
F-20
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
(Dollars in Thousands Except Per Share Data)
7. Long-Term Debt (Continued)
to make an excess cash flow payment. However, the Company expects to make a voluntary prepayment
of $10,000 in 2012.
Each of the senior secured facilities entered into in the second quarter of 2011 includes a hedge
provision, which required the Company to enter into an interest rate hedge commencing 90 days after
the closing date. The hedging provision required the Company to hedge the interest rate on at least
25% of the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the term loans. The purpose of the interest rate
swap is to reduce the Company’s exposure to interest rate volatility. Effective June 20, 2011, the
Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of $50,000. The interest
rate swap negative fair value at December 31, 2011 of $621 is included in other long-term liabilities on
the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company has counterparty credit risk resulting from the interest
rate swap, which it monitors on an on-going basis. This risk lies with one global financial institution.
Under the interest rate swap agreement, effective as of July 18, 2011, the Company either receives or
makes payments on a monthly basis based on the differential between 6.335% and LIBOR plus 4.25%
(with a LIBOR floor of 1.5%). The interest rate swap contract on the term loan expires in December
2014.
8. Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities are summarized as follows:
Payroll and related costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Employee benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued warranty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 4,756
2,645
4,188
4,166
$ 2,993
2,334
3,399
3,197
$15,755
$11,923
December 31,
2011
2010
9. Warranty Liability
The Company accrues for estimated warranty costs as sales are recognized and periodically
assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty liability and adjusts the amount as necessary. The
Company’s warranties generally provide, with respect to its snow and ice control equipment, that all
material and workmanship will be free from defect for a period of two years after the date of purchase
by the end-user, and with respect to its parts and accessories purchased separately, that such parts and
accessories will be free from defect for a period of one year after the date of purchase by the end-user.
Certain snowplows only provide for a one year warranty. The Company determines the amount of the
estimated warranty costs (and its corresponding warranty reserve) based on the Company’s prior five
years of warranty history utilizing a formula driven by historical warranty expense and applying
management’s judgment. The Company adjusts its historical warranty costs to take into account unique
factors such as the introduction of new products into the marketplace that do not provide a historical
warranty record to assess. The warranty reserve is included with Accrued Expenses and Other Current
Liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
F-21
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
(Dollars in Thousands Except Per Share Data)
9. Warranty Liability (Continued)
The following is a rollforward of the Company’s warranty liability:
Balance at the beginning of the period . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Warranty provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Claims paid/settlements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 3,399
3,386
(2,597)
$ 3,040
2,604
(2,245)
$ 2,272
2,913
(2,145)
Balance at the end of the period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 4,188
$ 3,399
$ 3,040
December 31,
2011
2010
2009
10. Income Taxes
The provision for income tax expense (benefit) consists of the following:
Current:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Federal
State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 2,697
326
$ — $ 1,284
892
231
Year ended December 31
2011
2010
2009
Deferred:
Federal
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3,023
231
2,176
7,855
454
8,309
363
278
641
3,165
(1,355)
1,810
$11,332
$872
$ 3,986
A reconciliation of income tax expense computed at the federal statutory rate to the provision for
income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 is as follows:
Federal income tax expense at statutory rate . . . . . . . . .
State taxes, net of federal benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$10,630
1,522
$ 862
7
$ 4,840
302
2011
2010
2009
Valuation allowance changes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in uncertain tax positions, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Research and development credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rate change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Manufacturing tax benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(47)
(150)
(111)
(162)
(552)
202
311
(349)
(117)
95
—
63
(1,129)
276
(194)
—
—
(109)
$11,332
$ 872
$ 3,986
F-22
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
(Dollars in Thousands Except Per Share Data)
12. Employee Retirement Plans (Continued)
The reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the fair value of plan assets, funded
status of plans, and amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets consisted of the following:
December 31
2011
2010
Change in projected benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 28,557
961
$ 24,723
800
Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Effect of curtailment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Benefit obligation at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in plan assets:
1,539
4,126
(975)
(1,408)
1,432
2,884
(956)
(326)
32,800
28,557
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . .
Actual return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Employer contributions through December 31 . . . . . . . . . . .
Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
17,804
(109)
1,917
(975)
15,766
2,085
909
(956)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
18,637
17,804
Funded Status: accrued pension liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$(14,163) $(10,753)
In May 2010, in connection with the closure of the Company’s manufacturing facility in Johnson
City, TN substantially all the employees at this facility were terminated. This resulted in a cessation of
all future benefit accruals for these employees under the Company’s pension plans. A liability gain of
$326 from the curtailment was recognized as a reduction to the net actuarial loss, as the liability gain
was less than the unrecognized net actuarial loss prior to the curtailment for the pension plan in the
year ended December 31, 2010. Therefore, this did not impact the consolidated statement of income
for the year ended December 31, 2010.
In November 2011, the Company took the following actions with respect to its pension plans
effective as of December 31, 2011: It froze benefits as of January 1, 2012 for all employees under the
Company’s Pension Plan for Hourly Employees, froze benefits as of January 1, 2012 for all employees
under the Company’s Salaried Pension Plan for employees with less than five years of service and
grandfathered employees (other than certain highly compensated employees) under the Company’s
Salaried Pension Plan with five or more years of service, but reduced the benefit accrual from 1.67% of
pay to 1.00% of pay. In order to offset the loss of these benefit to employees, the Company has
enhanced its defined contribution plan. The company also established a nonqualified deferred
compensation plan effective as of January 1, 2012, for certain highly compensated employees whose
participation in the qualified plan is restricted. A liability gain of $1,408 from this curtailment was
recognized as a reduction to the net actuarial loss, as the liability gain was less than the unrecognized
net actuarial loss prior to the curtailment for the pension plan in the year ended December 31, 2011.
F-26
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
(Dollars in Thousands Except Per Share Data)
12. Employee Retirement Plans (Continued)
Therefore, this did not impact the consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31,
2011.
The components of net periodic pension cost consisted of the following for the years ended
December 31,
2011
2010
2009
Component of net periodic pension cost:
Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
961
1,539
(1,357)
454
$
800
1,432
(1,162)
324
$ 820
1,355
(984)
519
Net periodic pension cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 1,597
1,394
$1,710
The accumulated benefit obligation for all pension plans as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, was
$31,322 and $26,078, respectively.
In accordance with its adoption of ASC 715-20, the Company uses December 31, as its
measurement date for all periods presented. Assumptions used in determining net periodic pension cost
for the plans consisted of the following:
Discount rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.5% 6.0% 6.0%
Rates of increase in compensation levels:
Year ended
December 31
2011
2010
2009
Salaried . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.5
Hourly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N/A N/A N/A
8.0
Expected long-term rate of return on assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.5
8.0
8.0
3.5
The discount rate used to determine the benefit obligation at December 31, 2011 and 2010 is 4.6%
and 5.5%, respectively.
For 2012, the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is 7.25%. To determine the
long-term rate of return assumption for plan assets, the Company studies historical markets and
preserves the long-term historical relationships between equities and fixed-income securities consistent
with the widely accepted capital market principle that assets with higher volatility generate a greater
return over the long run. The Company evaluates current market factors such as inflation and interest
rates before it determines long-term capital market assumptions and reviews peer data and historical
returns to check for reasonableness and appropriateness.
F-27
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
(Dollars in Thousands Except Per Share Data)
12. Employee Retirement Plans (Continued)
The expected benefit payments under the pension plans are as follows:
2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2017 - 2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$1,260
1,310
1,340
1,360
1,380
8,020
The Company made required minimum pension funding contributions of $1,917 to the pension
plans in 2011 and currently expects to make $2,512 required minimum pension funding contributions in
2012.
The Company maintains target allocation percentages among various asset classes based on an
investment policy established for the pension plans, which is designed to achieve long-term objectives of
return, while mitigating downside risk and considering expected cash flows. The current weighted-
average target asset allocations are reflective of actual investments at December 31, 2011 and 2010.
The investment policy is reviewed periodically in order to achieve overall objectives in light of current
circumstances.
The Company’s weighted-average asset allocation and actual allocation for the qualified pension
plans by asset category at December 31 is as follows:
Target
2011
2010
Large Cap Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mid Cap Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Small Cap Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
International Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Emerging markets Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fixed Income and Cash Equivalents . . . . . .
Real Estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
37% $ 5,901
750
4%
783
3%
12% 2,041
2%
353
34% 6,966
8% 1,843
32% $ 6,297
799
4%
772
4%
11% 2,379
2%
284
37% 6,148
10% 1,125
35%
5%
4%
13%
2%
35%
6%
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
100% $18,637
100% $17,804
100%
The investment strategy is to build an efficient, well-diversified portfolio based on a long-term,
strategic outlook of the investment markets. The investment market outlook utilizes both historical-
based and forward-looking return forecasts to establish future return expectations for various asset
classes. These return expectations are used to develop a core asset allocation based on the needs of the
plan. The core asset allocation utilizes investment portfolios of various asset classes and multiple
investment managers in order to help maximize the plan’s return while providing multiple layers of
diversification to help minimize risk.
F-28
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
(Dollars in Thousands Except Per Share Data)
12. Employee Retirement Plans (Continued)
The following table presents the fair values of the plan assets related to the Company’s pension
plans within the fair value hierarchy as defined in Note 2.
The fair values of the Company’s pension plan assets as of December 31, 2011 are as follows:
Balance as of
December 31,
2011
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Equity holdings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fixed-income holdings . . . . . . . . . . . .
Alternative investments . . . . . . . . . . . .
$10,575
6,966
1,096
Total pension plan assets . . . . . . . . . . .
$18,637
$—
—
—
$—
$10,575
6,966
—
$17,541
$ —
—
1,096
$1,096
The fair values of the Company’s pension plan assets as of December 31, 2010 are as follows:
Balance as of
December 31,
2010
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Equity holdings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fixed-income holdings . . . . . . . . . . . .
Alternative investments . . . . . . . . . . . .
$10,938
6,148
718
Total pension plan assets . . . . . . . . . . .
$17,804
$—
—
—
$—
$10,938
6,148
—
$17,086
$ —
—
718
$718
Level 2 investments are based on quoted prices for similar assets in markets that are not active
while Level 3 investments are comprised of a real estate fund for which the fair value is determined by
taking the appraised values of the properties on hand plus other assets and subtracting mortgage loans
and other liabilities.
The following table presents a reconciliation of the fair value measurements using significant
unobservable inputs (Level 3):
Balance, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 718
$619
Deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
408
—
Actual return on plan assets held at reporting date . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Withdrawals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
129
99
(159) —
Balance, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$1,096
$718
December 31,
2011
2010
F-29
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
(Dollars in Thousands Except Per Share Data)
12. Employee Retirement Plans (Continued)
Postretirement benefits
The Company provides postretirement healthcare benefits for certain employee groups. The
postretirement healthcare plans are contributory and contain certain other cost-sharing features such as
deductibles and coinsurance. The plans are unfunded. Employees do not vest until they retire from
active employment with the Company and have at least twelve years of service. These benefits can be
amended or terminated at anytime and are subject to the same ongoing changes as our healthcare
benefits for employees with respect to deductible, co-insurance and participant contributions.
Effective January 1, 2004, the postretirement healthcare benefits were extended to all active
employees of the Company as of December 31, 2003. The period of coverage was reduced and the
retiree contribution percentage was increased in order to keep the cost of the plan equivalent to the
previous plan design.
Maximum coverage under the plan is limited to ten years. All benefits terminate upon the death of
the retiree. Employees who began working for the Company after December 31, 2003, are not eligible
for postretirement healthcare benefits.
The reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the projected benefit obligation for the
Company consisted of the following:
December 31
2011
2010
Change in projected benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Service cost
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Participant contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Changes in actuarial assumptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Plan Curtailment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$7,576
263
407
95
426
(365)
$ 8,198
308
455
94
(154)
(294)
— (1,031)
Projected benefit obligation at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$8,402
$ 7,576
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets consisted
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retiree health benefit obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 349
8,053
$
341
7,235
$8,402
$ 7,576
In May 2010, in connection with the closure of the Company’s manufacturing facility in Johnson
City, TN substantially all the employees at this facility were terminated. This resulted in a cessation of
all future benefit accruals for these employees under the Company’s other post employment benefit
(‘‘OPEB’’) plan. The liability gain for the OPEB plan exceeded the unrecognized net actuarial loss
prior to the curtailment and resulted in a gain of $1,031 of which $667 was recorded in selling, general
and administrative expense in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31,
F-30
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
(Dollars in Thousands Except Per Share Data)
12. Employee Retirement Plans (Continued)
2010 and $364 (before taxes) was recognized as a reduction to the net actuarial loss in accumulated
other comprehensive loss at December 31, 2010.
The components of postretirement healthcare benefit cost consisted of the following for the years
ended December 31,
Component of net postretirement health benefit cost:
Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of net gain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Curtailment gain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$305
$ 308
$263
419
455
407
(61)
(73)
(6)
— (667) —
Net postretirement healthcare benefit cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$609
$ 90
$651
2011
2010
2009
The assumed discount and healthcare cost trend rates are summarized as follows:
Year Ended
December 31
2011
2010
2009
Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Immediate healthcare cost trend rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.5% 6.0% 6.0%
9.0
9.0
8.5
Ultimate healthcare cost trend rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Assumed annual reduction in trend rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Participation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.0
*
80
5.0
0.5
80
5.0
0.5
80
* Health Care Cost Trend rate is assumed to be 9.0% beginning in 2011 gradually reducing
to an ultimate rate of 5.0% in 2017.
The discount rate used to determine the benefit obligation at December 31, 2011 and 2010 is 4.4%
and 5.5%, respectively. For the years ending December 31, 2009 and 2010 the combination of pension
and postretirement benefit cash flows were used to develop a single equivalent discount rate as the
results were materially the same. For 2011, a separate discount rate was determined for pension and
postretirement benefits. For December 31, 2011, the health care cost trend rate is assumed to be 8.0%
beginning in 2012 gradually reducing to an ultimate rate of 4.5% in 2019.
A one percentage point change in the healthcare cost trend rate would have the following effect at
December 31, 2011:
Effect on total service and interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
96
1,013
$ (81)
(866)
1%
Increase
1%
Decrease
F-31
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
(Dollars in Thousands Except Per Share Data)
12. Employee Retirement Plans (Continued)
Amounts included in other comprehensive loss, net of tax, at December 31, 2011, which have not
yet been recognized in net periodic pension or OPEB cost, were net actuarial gain (loss) of ($7,185)
and $96 for the pension plans and postretirement healthcare benefits, respectively. The estimated
actuarial gain (loss) for the defined benefit plans that will be amortized from accumulated other
comprehensive loss into net periodic pension or OPEB cost during 2012 are ($770) and $16 for the
pension plans and postretirement healthcare benefits, respectively.
Defined contribution plan
The Company has a defined contribution plan, which qualifies under Section 401(k) of the Internal
Revenue Code and provides substantially all employees an opportunity to accumulate personal funds
for their retirement. Contributions are made on a before-tax basis to these plans.
As determined by the provisions of the plan, the Company matches a portion of the employees’
basic voluntary contributions. The Company matching contributions to the plan were approximately
$140, $123 and $137 for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Beginning
January 1, 2012, the Company amended its defined contribution plan to permit non-discretionary
employer contributions. This enhancement of the defined contribution plan occurred
contemporaneously with the pension plan amendments noted within this footnote under ‘‘Pension
benefits’’.
13. Stock-Based Compensation
Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan
In connection with the IPO, in May 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors and stockholders
amended and restated the Company’s 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (as amended and restated, the ‘‘A&R
2004 Plan’’) and certain outstanding award agreements thereunder, to among other things, eliminate
the ability of the holders thereunder to use a promissory note to pay any portion of the exercise price
of the options, to provide that the use of ‘‘net exercises’’ to pay any portion of the exercise price of the
options shall be at the sole discretion of the committee administering the A&R 2004 Plan, and to effect
certain ministerial changes under the A&R 2004 Plan. In addition, in connection with the IPO, the
Board of Directors also resolved not to issue any further awards under the A&R 2004 Plan. As of
December 31, 2011, 37,240 shares of common stock are reserved for issuance upon the exercise of
outstanding options under the A&R 2004 Plan. All outstanding options are fully vested. All options
expire 10 years from the date of grant.
2010 Stock Incentive Plan
In connection with the IPO, in May 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors and stockholders
adopted the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan (the ‘‘2010 Plan’’). The 2010 Plan provides for the issuance of
nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards
and restricted stock units, any of which may be performance-based, and for incentive bonuses, which
may be paid in cash or stock or a combination of both, to eligible employees, officers, non-employee
directors and other service providers to the Company and its subsidiaries. A maximum of 2,130,000
F-32
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
(Dollars in Thousands Except Per Share Data)
13. Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)
shares of common stock may be issued pursuant to all awards under the 2010 Plan. As of
December 31, 2011, the Company had 1,800,214 shares of common stock available for future issuance
of awards under the 2010 Plan. The shares of common stock to be issued under the 2010 Plan will be
made available from authorized and unissued Company common stock.
Stock Options
The following table summarizes information with respect to the Company’s stock option activity
under the A&R 2004 Plan for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009.
Outstanding—beginning of year . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Canceled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Outstanding—end of year . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercisable—end of year . . . . . . . . . . . .
December 31, 2011
December 31, 2010
December 31, 2009
Weighted
average
exercise
price
$4.21
—
—
4.21
$4.21
$4.21
Weighted
average
exercise
price
$4.21
—
4.21
—
$4.21
$4.21
Weighted
average
exercise
price
$4.21
—
4.21
—
$4.21
$4.21
Options
908,556
—
(89,371)
—
819,185
747,935
Options
819,185
—
—
(462,562)
356,623
309,113
Options
356,623
—
—
(319,383)
37,240
37,240
Certain of the Company’s option holders exercised 319,383 stock options during the year ended
December 31, 2011, of which 184,236 options were exercised utilizing a broker assisted cashless
exercise. The options exercised were granted under APB 25 with an exercise price equal to fair value at
date of grant, and accordingly so, no compensation expense was recorded at the time of grant. The
Company did not bear the risk and rewards of the options and thus, did not record stock based
compensation expense. The option holders paid the Company the required exercise price for the
remaining options at the time of exercise and therefore the Company did not record any stock based
compensation expense.
In connection with the IPO in 2010, certain of the Company’s selling stockholders exercised
288,001 stock options and sold the underlying shares. Such stockholders paid the exercise price of such
options through a net exercise. Subsequent to the IPO, certain of the Company’s option holders
exercised 174,571 stock options and paid the exercise price of such options through a net exercise,
resulting in an additional 95,000 outstanding shares. The options exercised in conjunction with the IPO
as well as those exercised subsequently in the year ended December 31, 2010 were granted under
APB 25 with an exercise price equal to fair value at date of grant, and accordingly no compensation
expense was recorded at the time of grant. Because of the net exercise mechanism, the option holders
did not bear the risk and rewards of the options. As such, the Company recorded $2,975 of stock based
compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2010 related to stock options.
On January 23, 2009, the Company entered into securities repurchase agreements with certain
members of management. Pursuant to these agreements, the Company repurchased at fair value and
F-33
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
(Dollars in Thousands Except Per Share Data)
13. Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)
subsequently retired 32,633 shares of common stock and 89,371 stock options in exchange for aggregate
consideration of $1,137, comprised of a cash payment of $1,000 and the satisfaction of the remaining
principal amount of $137 on promissory notes held by the members of management. As a result of the
repurchase of stock options, the Company recorded $732 of compensation expense in the first quarter
of 2009, which represented the fair value of the repurchased options. See footnote 16, ‘‘Redeemable
stock and stockholders’ equity.’’
As of December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the weighted-average remaining contractual life of all
outstanding options was 4.7, 4.0 and 4.8 years, respectively. As of December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009,
the weighted-average remaining contractual life of all exercisable options was 4.7, 3.6 and 4.6 years,
respectively.
The aggregate intrinsic value of the options at December 31, 2011 was $388 for both options
outstanding and exercisable. The aggregate intrinsic value of the options at December 31, 2010 was
$3,901 and $3,382 for options outstanding and exercisable, respectively. There were no options
exercised for the year ended December 31, 2009. The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options
exercised during 2011 and 2010 was $3,200 and $2,885, respectively.
As of December 31, 2010, the Company had shareholders’ notes receivable with recourse of $482
including accrued interest, respectively, related to the exercise of options, which are included as a
component of shareholders’ equity. The shareholders’ notes receivable were repaid by the shareholders
in conjunction with the secondary offering which closed on May 20, 2011.
Restricted Stock
Restricted stock carries both voting and dividend rights. A summary of restricted stock activity for
the year ended December 31, 2011 is as follows:
Shares
(In thousands)
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair value
Unvested at December 31, 2009 . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cancelled and forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unvested at December 31, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cancelled and forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
242,088
—
—
242,088
43,690
(50,111)
—
Unvested at December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . .
235,667
—
$11.68
—
—
11.68
14.99
11.77
—
$12.27
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
—
—
—
—
4.01 years
2.00 years
—
—
2.83 years
Expected to vest in the future at
December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
227,183
$12.27
2.83 years
F-34
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
(Dollars in Thousands Except Per Share Data)
13. Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)
The fair value of the Company’s restricted stock awards is the closing stock price on the date of
grant. The Company recognized $848 and $419 of compensation expense related to restricted stock
awards for the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The unrecognized
compensation expense for shares expected to vest as of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was
approximately $2,154 and $2,311, respectively. Meanwhile, no shares vested in 2010.
Unrestricted Stock
The Company granted 68,224 and 44,350 shares of unrestricted stock as performance based awards
under the 2010 plan in the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The
fair value of the Company’s unrestricted stock awards is the closing stock price on the date of grant, or
$15.01 and $14.32 per share, for grants in years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively. The Company recognized $1,024 and $635 of compensation expense related to unrestricted
stock awards granted for the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The
unrestricted awards granted in 2010 were issued in March 2011, while the awards granted in 2011 will
be issued in March 2012. There is no required vesting period for the unrestricted stock awards as
recipients are entitled to shares upon grant and performance satisfaction, which both have occurred by
the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2011.
Restricted Stock Units
Restricted stock units (‘‘RSUs’’) are issued to the board of directors and carry dividend rights but
do not carry voting rights. Each RSU represents the right to receive one share of the Company’s
common stock and are subject to time based vesting restrictions. Participants are not required to pay
any consideration to the Company at either the time of grant of a RSU or upon vesting.
A summary of RSU activity for the year ended December 31, 2011 is as follows:
Shares
(In thousands)
Unvested at December 31, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cancelled and forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unvested at December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . .
—
20,612
1,719
—
18,893
Expected to vest in the future at
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair value
—
$15.21
15.25
—
$15.20
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
—
2.00 years
—
—
2.00 years
December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
18,893
$15.20
2.00 years
Vested RSU’s are ‘‘settled’’ by the delivery to the participant or a designated brokerage firm of
one share of common stock per vested RSU as soon as reasonably practicable following a termination
of service of the participant that constitutes a separation from service, and in all events no later than
F-35
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
(Dollars in Thousands Except Per Share Data)
13. Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)
the end of the calendar year in which such termination of employment occurs or, if later, two and
one-half months after such termination of employment.
14. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share of common stock is computed by dividing net income by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share of
common stock is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares
and common stock equivalents related to the assumed exercise of stock options, using the two-class
method. Stock options for which the exercise price exceeds the average fair value have an anti-dilutive
effect on earnings per share and are excluded from the calculation. There were no shares excluded
from diluted earnings per share for the years presented.
Subsequent to the payment of the third quarter 2010 dividend, which was the first dividend
payment made subsequent to the IPO, management retroactively approved all restricted stockholders
for shares issued and outstanding to participate in dividends. As such, the Company has calculated
earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method, which is an earnings allocation formula that
determines earnings per share for common stock and participating securities according to dividends
declared and participation rights in undistributed earnings. Under this method, all earnings (distributed
and undistributed) are allocated to common shares and participating securities based on their
respective rights to receive dividends.
2011
2010
2009
Basic earnings per common share
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less income allocated to participating securities . . . . . . . . . .
Net income allocated to common shareholders . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
19,040
233
18,807
Weighted average common shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . .
21,650,736
Earnings per common share assuming dilution
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less income allocated to participating securities . . . . . . . . . .
Net income allocated to common shareholders . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
$
0.87
19,040
233
18,807
$
$
$
$
$
1,662
12
1,650
18,799,761
0.09
1,662
12
1,650
$
$
$
$
$
9,843
—
9,843
14,423,470
0.68
9,843
—
9,843
Weighted average common shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . .
Incremental shares applicable to stock based compensation . .
21,650,736
163,881
18,799,761
487,685
14,423,470
325,328
Weighted average common shares assuming dilution . . . . . . .
21,814,617
19,287,446
14,748,798
$
0.85
$
0.09
$
0.67
F-36
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
(Dollars in Thousands Except Per Share Data)
15. Commitments and Contingencies
In the ordinary course of business, the Company is engaged in various litigation including product
liability and intellectual property disputes. However, the Company does not believe that any pending
litigation will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position, consolidated results
of operations or liquidity. In addition, the Company is not currently a party to any environmental-
related claims or legal matters.
16. Redeemable stock and stockholders’ equity
Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock
The authorized capital stock of the Company includes 100,000 shares of preferred stock, of which
65,000 shares have been designated as Series A preferred stock (‘‘Series A’’). All shares of Series A
have been redeemed and therefore no shares of Series A were issued and outstanding as of
December 31, 2011 and 2010. The par value of Series A is $0.01 per share.
The Series A is non-voting except as required by Delaware law, and Series A stockholders do not
have the right to elect any members of the Company’s Board of Directors. The Series A ranks senior
to the Series B and C preferred stock and common stock related to dividend rights and distributions
upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company. Dividends accrue on the Series A at a rate
of 10% per annum on the stated value of the Series A plus 10% of the aggregate of all annual
dividends that a holder of Series A will have become entitled to receive but which has not been
declared and paid by the Company. The Company accretes dividends based on the terms of the
Series A set forth in the Company’s certificate of incorporation.
The Series A is subject to redemption at anytime, in whole or in part, at the option of the Board
of Directors, which is controlled by the preferred stockholders and thus outside the control of the
Company, at a redemption price per share equal to Series A stated value of $1,000 per share plus all
accrued but unpaid cumulative dividends.
Series B Redeemable Preferred Stock
One share of preferred stock has been designated as Series B preferred stock (‘‘Series B’’) and no
shares were issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The par value of
Series B is $0.01 per share.
In addition to any voting rights to which the holders of the Series B may be entitled by law, so
long as the Series B remains outstanding, the holder of the share, voting as a single series, are entitled
to elect four directors to the Company’s Board of Directors. The Series B ranks junior to the Series A,
on parity with the Series C preferred stock and senior to the common stock as to dividend rights and
distributions upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company. The holder of Series B is not
entitled to receive dividends. However, subject to certain exceptions, so long as any shares of Series B
or Series C preferred stock are outstanding, the Company may not pay dividends or make other
distributions with respect to its junior securities (including common stock). This dividend restriction
may be waived by the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of Series B and Series C
preferred stock, voting as a single class.
F-37
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
(Dollars in Thousands Except Per Share Data)
16. Redeemable stock and stockholders’ equity (Continued)
The Series B is subject to mandatory redemption at any time the holder’s ownership of both
preferred stock and common stock falls below certain percentages. The fixed redemption price per
share is $1,000 per share, which equals the initial amount paid for the share. At the time of any such
redemption, any members of the Company’s Board of Directors elected by the Series B shall cease to
be members of the Board without further action of any kind by the Company or its stockholders. The
Series B share was redeemed in conjunction with the IPO in May of 2010.
Series C Redeemable Preferred Stock
One share of preferred stock has been designated as Series B preferred stock (‘‘Series C’’) and no
shares were issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The par value of
Series C is $0.01 per share.
In addition to any voting rights to which the holders of the Series C may be entitled by law, so
long as the Series C remains outstanding, the holder of the share, voting as a single series, is entitled to
elect two directors to the Company’s Board of Directors. The Series C ranks junior to the Series A, on
a parity with the Series B preferred stock and senior to the common stock as to dividend rights and
distributions upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company. The holder of Series C is not
entitled to receive dividends. However, subject to certain exceptions, so long as any shares of Series B
or Series C preferred stock are outstanding, the Company may not pay dividends or make other
distributions with respect to its junior securities (including common stock). This dividend restriction
may be waived by the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of Series B and Series C
preferred stock, voting as a single class.
The Series C is subject to mandatory redemption at any time the holder’s beneficial ownership of
both preferred stock and common stock falls below certain percentages. The fixed redemption price per
share is $1,000 per share, which equals the initial amount paid for the share. At the time of any such
redemption, any members of the Company’s Board of Directors elected by the Series C shall cease to
be members of the Board without further action of any kind by the Company or its stockholders. The
Series C share was redeemed in conjunction with the IPO in May of 2010.
Common Stock
The Company has 200,000,000 shares of common stock authorized, of which 22,020,694 and
21,579,655 were issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The par value
of the common stock is $0.01 per share.
The holders of common stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters submitted to a vote
of stockholders. In the event of any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of
the Company, common stockholders would be entitled to share ratably in the Company’s assets and
funds remaining after payment of liabilities and after provision is made for each class of stock having
preference over the Company’s common stock, including Series A, B and C preferred stock.
F-38
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
(Dollars in Thousands Except Per Share Data)
16. Redeemable stock and stockholders’ equity (Continued)
Deferred Stock Plan
The Company has previously issued to certain members of management deferred common stock
units and deferred preferred stock units, in each case representing the right to receive less than 1% of
its fully-diluted equity capitalization. These deferred units were issued in consideration for the
cancellation of accrued award balances in the Douglas Dynamics, LLC Long Term Incentive Plan.
Deferred units were issued at a price equal to the fair value of the common stock at the date of
issuance. Deferred units have all rights of common and preferred shareholders, excluding voting rights,
and convert to common and preferred stock upon a change in control, or initial public offering of the
Company’s stock. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010 there were no deferred preferred stock units
outstanding.
As of both December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had no deferred common stock units
outstanding. In the fourth quarter of 2010, the 174,229 deferred stock units converted into common
stock, subsequent to the IPO of the Company’s stock, upon expiration of the lock-up agreement.
Common Stock Repurchase
On January 23, 2009, the Company entered into securities repurchase agreements with certain
members of management. Pursuant to these agreements, the Company repurchased at fair value and
subsequently retired 32,633 shares of common stock and 89,371 stock options in exchange for aggregate
consideration of $1,137, comprised of a cash payment of $1,000 and the satisfaction of the remaining
principal amount of $137 on promissory notes held by the members of management. As a result of the
repurchase of stock options, the Company recorded $732 of compensation expense in the first quarter
of 2009, which represented the fair value of the repurchased options.
F-39
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
(Dollars in Thousands Except Per Share Data)
17. Valuation and qualifying accounts
The Company’s valuation and qualifying accounts for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010
and 2009 are as follows:
Balance at
beginning
of year
Additions
charged to
earnings
Changes to
reserve, net(1)
Balance at
end of year
Year ended December 31, 2011
Allowance for doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reserves for inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$1,200
1,404
$1,106
1,080
$(1,059)
(1,196)
Valuation of deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
877
—
(47)
Year ended December 31, 2010
Allowance for doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reserves for inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 755
1,931
$ 966
930
$ (521)
(1,457)
Valuation of deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
566
343
(32)
Year ended December 31, 2009
Allowance for doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reserves for inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 622
1,736
$ 281
1,347
$ (148)
(1,153)
Valuation of deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,695
84
(1,213)
$1,247
1,288
830
$1,200
1,404
877
$ 755
1,931
566
(1) Deductions from the allowance for doubtful accounts equal accounts receivable written off, less
recoveries, against the allowance. Deductions from the reserves for inventory excess and obsolete
items equal inventory written off against the reserve as items were disposed of. Deductions to the
valuation of deferred tax assets relate to the reversals due to changes in management’s judgments
regarding the future realization of the underlying deferred tax assets.
18. Restructuring
On April 27, 2009, the Company announced a plan to close its Johnson City, TN manufacturing
facility and move production from this facility to its Milwaukee, WI and Rockland, ME facilities. The
company completed the closure of this facility as of August 31, 2010. The Company expects to realize
significant annual cost savings and improved customer delivery performance as a result. The closure has
resulted in the elimination of approximately 100 positions in Johnson City and the addition of
approximately 50 positions in Rockland and approximately 35 positions in Milwaukee.
Related to the facility closure, the Company recorded $50 of employee termination costs and
$1,385 for other closure costs for the year ended December 31, 2010. Restructuring expenses of $1,054
were recorded for the year ended December 31, 2009. These costs are included in the selling, general
and administrative expense line in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. For the year
ended December 31, 2011, the Company did not incur any restructuring charges, nor does the
Company expect to incur any additional costs related to the closure in the future.
F-40
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
(Dollars in Thousands Except Per Share Data)
18. Restructuring (Continued)
The following represents a reconciliation of changes in the restructuring reserves related to this
project through December 31, 2011.
Accrued restructuring reserves as of December 31, 2008 . . . . . . . . . .
Activity during year ended December 31, 2009:
Charges to earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued restructuring reserves as of December 31, 2009 . . . . . . . . . .
Activity during year ended December 31, 2010:
Charges to earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued restructuring reserves as of December 31, 2010 . . . . . . . . . .
Payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued restructuring reserves as of December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . .
Employee
Termination Other Exit
Costs
$ —
690
—
Costs
Total
$ — $ —
364
(364)
1,054
(364)
$ 690
$ — $
690
50
(710)
$ 30
(30)
$ —
1,385
(1,385)
1,435
(2,095)
$ — $
—
30
(30)
$ — $ —
In connection with the restructuring, the Company reassessed the useful lives of its manufacturing
facility and certain equipment. As a result of this assessment, the Company assigned shorter useful lives
to these assets and recorded accelerated depreciation of $2,071 for the year ended December 31, 2010.
This change in estimate reduced basic and diluted earnings per share by $0.07 and $0.07 for the year
ended December 31, 2010. The Company recorded accelerated depreciation of $900 for the year ended
December 31, 2009. This change in estimate reduced basic and diluted earnings per share by $0.04 and
$0.04 for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Because of actions taken in the restructuring, the Johnson City property is being actively marketed
for sale and is classified as held for sale in the consolidated balance sheet.
19. Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)
2011
First
Second
Third
Fourth
Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross profit
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income (loss) before taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Basic net earnings (loss) per common share attributable to
$71,557
$23,490
$ 9,071
$26,338
$ (475) $15,389
$ (800) $ 9,723
common shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ (0.04) $
0.44
Earnings (loss) per common share assuming dilution
attributable to common shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividends per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ (0.04) $
$
0.57
$
0.44
0.20
$53,495
$16,494
$ 6,291
$ 3,967
$
$
$
0.18
0.18
0.20
$60,256
$19,914
$ 9,167
$ 6,150
$
$
$
0.28
0.28
0.21
F-41
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
(Dollars in Thousands Except Per Share Data)
19. Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited) (Continued)
Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross profit
Income (loss) before taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Basic net earnings (loss) per common share attributable to
2010
First
Second
Third
Fourth
$47,448
$66,243
$14,647
$15,227
$25,061
$ 1,980
$ (9,424) $ (1,302) $ 4,464
$ 2,185
$ (5,719) $
75
$48,457
$18,033
$ 8,796
$ 5,121
common shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ (0.40) $ — $
0.10
$
0.24
Earnings (loss) per common share assuming dilution
attributable to common shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividends per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ (0.40) $ — $
0.10
$ — $ — $ 0.18
$
0.23
$ 0.20
Due to changes in stock prices during the year and timing of issuance of shares, the sum of
quarterly earnings per share may not equal the annual earnings per share.
F-42
Subsidiary List
Douglas Dynamics, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company
Douglas Dynamics Finance Company, a Delaware corporation
Fisher, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Exhibit 21.1
Exhibit 23.1
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8
No. 333-169342) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 2010 Stock Incentive Plan of Douglas
Dynamics, Inc. of our report dated March 13, 2012, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Douglas Dynamics, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2011.
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
March 13, 2012
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Exhibit 31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Rule 13a-14(a)
or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
I, James L. Janik, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Douglas Dynamics, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of
the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 13, 2012
/s/ JAMES L. JANIK
James L. Janik
President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Rule 13a-14(a)
or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
I, Robert McCormick, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Douglas Dynamics, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of
the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 13, 2012
/s/ ROBERT L. MCCORMICK
Robert L. McCormick
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1
Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Douglas Dynamics, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’), hereby certify, based on our knowledge,
that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the
‘‘Report’’) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
/s/ JAMES L. JANIK
James L. Janik
Chief Executive Officer
/s/ ROBERT L. MCCORMICK
Robert L. McCormick
Chief Financial Officer
Date: March 13, 2012