Quarterlytics / Financial Services / Banks - Regional / Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc.

Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc.

ebmt · NASDAQ Financial Services
Claim this profile
Ticker ebmt
Exchange NASDAQ
Sector Financial Services
Industry Banks - Regional
Employees 372
← All annual reports
FY2010 Annual Report · Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc.
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
EAGLE BANCORP 
M O N T A N A, 

I N C. 

msfiWii 

'«|fri 

'I 

Steadfast  growth  in 
unprecedented  times. 

2 0 10  A N N U AL 

R E P O RT 

E a g le  B a n c o rp  M o n t a n a, 

I n c .,  the  stockholding  company  of  American  Federal  Savings  Bank, 

completed  its  second-step  conversion  on  April  5,  2010, from  the  partially-public  mutual  holding  company 

structure  to  the  fully  publicly-owned  stock  holding  company  structure.  As  part  of  that  transaction,  it  also 

completed  a  related  stock  offering.  As  a  result  of  the  conversion  and  offering,  the  Company  became  the 

stock  holding  company  for  American  Federal  Savings  Bank,  and  Eagle  Financial  MHC  and  Eagle  Bancorp 

ceased  to  exist.  The  Company  sold  a total  of  2,464,274  shares  of  common  stock  at  a purchase  price  of 

$10.00  per  share for  gross  proceeds  of  $24.6  million. 

Helena—Main  Branch 
1400  Prospect  Avenue,  Helena,  MT  59601 

Helena—Neill  Avenue 
28  Neill  Avenue,  Helena,  MT  59601 

Helena—Skyway 
2090  Cromwell  Dixon  Lane,  Helena,  MT  59602 

Townsend 
416  Broadway  Street,  Townsend,  MT  59644 

Boreman 
1455  W.  Oak  Street,  Bozeman,  MT  59715 

Butte 
3401  Harrison  Avenue,  Butte,  MT  59701 

Tola! Assets 
dollars  in  millions 

Stock Price* 
in  dollars 

D i v i d e n d s* 
dollars per  share 

EPS* 
basic,  in  dollars 

300 

0.60 

0.50 

0.40 

0.30 

0.10 

0.05 

06  07  08  09  10 

06  07  08  09  10 

06  07  08  09  10 

06  07  08  09  10 

'Calculated  on  a  converted basis  using 3.8  to  I  exchange  ratio. 

Financial  Highlights 

(Dollars  in thousands) 

2010 

2009 

2008 

2007 

2006 

For  the  Years  Ended June  30 

Selected  Financial  Condition  Data: 

Total  Assets 

Net  Loans 

Total  Securities 

Total  Deposits 

Total  Shareholders'  Equity 

Selected  Operating  Data: 

Net  Interest  Income 

Provision  for  Loan  Losses 

Non-interest  Income 

Non-interest  Expense 

Net  Income 

$325,739 

$289,709 

$279,907 

$244,686 

$226,178 

169,502 

167,197 

168,149 

158,140 

140,858 

114,653 

82,663 

80,435 

65,695 

65,216 

197,939 

187,199 

178,851 

179,647 

174,342 

52,432 

27,792 

25,634 

24,088 

22,545 

$ 

9,802 

$  9,233 

$ 

7,436 

$ 

715 

3,593 

9,231 

257 

2,999 

8,563 

(175) 

2,224 

7,063 

6,685 
— 
2,261 

6,614 

$ 

6,714 
— 
2,165 

6,465 

$ 

2,414 

2,388 

2,110 

$ 

1,778 

$ 

1,785 

Non-Performing Assets to Total Assets  Remain 
Well  Below  Peers. 

Non-Performing Assets to Total Assets 

Peer Median 

Peer Average 

Eagle Bancorp 

1.00 

03/31/08 

06/30/08 

1 

09/30/08 

12/31/08 

03/31/09 

06/30/09 

09/30/09 

12/31/09 

03/31/10 

06/30/10 

Eagle Bancorp  MT, Inc. 

To Our  Stockholders, Customers, and  Friends: 

The  Board  of  Directors,  management,  and  staff  of  Eagle  Bancorp  Montana,  Inc.  and  its  wholly 

owned  subsidiary,  American  Federal  Savings  Bank,  are pleased to  present  our  annual  report 

for  our  fiscal  year ended June 30, 2010. 

The  year's  highlight  was  our  successful  second-step  stock 

community  banks  such  as American  Federal. Credit  quality 

offering,  which  closed  on  April  5th. We  raised  over  $24 

also  continues  to  be  a significant  problem  for  many  banks 

million  in  gross  proceeds,  thanks  to  the  strong  support 

throughout  the  U.S.  Montana  banks  had  avoided  credit 

of  our  stockholders,  customers  and  communities.  This 

concerns  until  this  year,  with  several  now  experiencing 

additional  capital  puts  the  Company  in  an  extremely  strong 

credit  quality  challenges,  primarily  in  loans  related  to 

position  to  take  advantage  of  growth  opportunities,  through 

land  development.  1  am  pleased  to  report  that  our  non-

strategic  acquisition  or  organic  growth.  I believe  the  timing 

performing  loans,  although  increasing  slightly  from  last  year, 

of  our  offering  worked  in  our  favor,  just  after  the  capital 

still  remain  significantly  lower  than  our  peers.  Montana's 

markets  "thawed"  and  before  the  market  became  crowded 

economy  is  projected  to  have  slow  growth  over  the  next 

with  other  financial  institutions  trying to  raise  capital.  The 

few  years,  and  has  maintained  a  lower  unemployment  rate 

owners  of  Eagle  Bancorp,  the  predecessor  to  Eagle  Bancorp 

than  the  national  average  throughout  the  recent  national 

Montana,  Inc.  (EBMT),  received  3.8  new  shares  of  EBMT 

recession.  The  housing  markets  in  Montana  (with  the 

for  every  share they  owned  previously.  New  shareholders 

exception  of  Bozeman,  Missoula  and  Kalispell)  have  not 

purchased  shares  that  were  valued  at approximately  8 0%  of 

experienced  the  downturn  seen  in  other  parts of  the  country. 

book  value,  allowing  for  future  appreciation.  The  increased 

number  of  shares  also  enabled  the  Company  to  move  up 

to  the  NASDAQ  exchange,  providing  better  liquidity  for  our 

stockholders.  We  were  also  able  to  increase  our  dividend 

by  2.3%,  the  tenth  consecutive  year  of  dividend  increases. 

The  Company's  performance  marks  another  successful 

year,  with  an  increase  in  net  income  of  $26,000,  or  1.1% 

over  the  previous  year.  Basic  earnings  per  share  also 

increased  from  $0.59  to  $0.50  (adjusted  for  the  3.8  to  1 

exchange  ratio).  Two  factors  should  be  considered  when 

This  past  year  has  seen  continued  focus  on  the  banking 

reviewing  this  year's  results: 

industry  and  its  role  in  the  turbulence  in  financial  markets 

and  the  resulting  impact  on  the  national  economy.  This  led 

to  Congress  enacting  historic  financial  reform  legislation, 

also  known  as the  Dodd-Frank  Act.  The  full  impact  of  the 

legislation  will  not  be  known  for  several  years,  as  regulations 

begin  to  be  promulgated  by  the  national  banking  regulatory 

agencies.  It  is  easy  to  predict  that  it  will  translate  into 

increased  workloads  and  resultant  higher  costs  at  banks 

across  the  country,  with  a disproportionate  share falling  on 

•  Short-term  interest  rates  have  continued  to  stay  at 

historically  low  levels,  with  long-term  interest  rates  also 

remaining  low.  The  continued  low  level  of  short-term 

interest  rates  has enabled  us to  lower  our  interest  expense 

again  this  year,  leading  to  an  increase  in  our  net  interest 

income  of  over  6%  (before  provision  for  loan  losses). 

We  did  experience  a decline  in  gain  on  sale  of  loans 

of  $936,000  compared  to  last  year,  when  mortgage 

refinance  activity  was  at  record  levels. 

//eSna^  '^'lAnoK 

:  2010  Annual  Report 

American  Federal's  Prospect  branch  serves  as  headquarters  to 
Eagle  Bancorp  Montana,  inc.  and  American  Federal  Savings  Bank. 
Their  main  office  was  constructed  in  February  of  1997.  American 
Federal  originated  in  Helena,  in  1922  as  "American  Building 
and  Loan,"  a State  Building  and  Loan  Association  specializing  in 
savings  and  home  loans.  Helena  is the  capital  city  of  Montana  and 
the  county  seat  of  Lewis  and  Clark  County.  It  is  home  to  Carroll 
College,  a Catholic  liberal  arts  university.  Helena  enjoys  a  good 
degree  of  economic  stability.  It  is  a trading  and  transportation 
center  for  nearby  livestock,  mining,  and  farming  enterprises.  The 
economic  health  of  Montana's  state  government  is far  better  than 
that  of  other  states  as job  losses  due  to  budget  cuts  are  minimal. 

•  The  Company  increased  its  loan  loss  provision  by 

During  the  last  quarter  of  our  fiscal  year,  we  did  complete 

$458,000  over  the  previous  year.  While  the  Company's 

our  preparation  for  complying  with  the  Section  404(b) 

level  of  non-performing  loans  is  lower  than  its  peers, 

provision  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act,  which  requires  our 

loan  delinquencies  have  increased,  though  they  still 

external  audit  firm  to  provide  an  attestation  as  to  the 

remain  relatively  low.  However,  the  other  quantitative 

quality  o f o ur  internal  controls  over  financial  reporting. 

and  qualitative  factors  considered  by  management  led 

The  Dodd-Frank  reform  bill  subsequently  removed  that 

to  the  decision  to  increase the  provision.  For  example, 

requirement  for  small  reporting  companies  such  as ours. 

national  and  state  unemployment  numbers  have 

Although  not  required  by  law  for  a Company  of  our  size, 

increased  during  the  year  and  home  sale  activity  has 

we  are  pleased  that  we  have  developed  internal  control 

slowed.  Also,  our  level  of  non-performing  loans  as 

processes  on  par  with  larger  companies. 

a  percentage  of  assets  increased,  from  0.43%  to 

1.05%.  Our  continued  conservative  underwriting 

and  stable  local  economies  will  serve  us well  during 

the  coming  year. 

Our  retail  branch  operations  continue  to  grow  and  improve. 

We  are  pleased  to  announce  that  our  new  full  service 

branch  on  Oak  Street,  in  Bozeman,  opened  in  October 

2009.  It  has  proven  to  be  a  success  in  its first  year,  drawing 

Total  assets  increased  12.44%  (compared  to  last  year's 

strong deposit  account  growth  with  a  larger  presence  in  the 

growth  of  3.50%)  driven  by  the  proceeds  of  the  stock 

Bozeman  market.  We  have closed  our  previous  location 

offering.  Securities  increased  39.22%  while  loans 

on  North  7th  Avenue. 

receivable  increased  1.72%.  Deposit  growth  continued 

to  be  strong, with  an  increase  of  5.74%,  compared  to  last 

year's  4.67%.  The  stock  proceeds  and  our  strong  earnings 

increased  our  core  capital  ratio  to  16.10% from  9.59%. 

Capital  deficiencies  and  a  lack  of  liquidity,  the  ability  to 

meet  short  term  cash  needs  of  depositors  and  creditors, 

I  would  like  to  thank  Don  Campbell,  who  is  retiring  after 

16  years  of  service  on  our  Board  of  Directors.  He  has 

been  a  dedicated  and  valuable  member  of  our  board  and 

our  Audit  Committee  and  we  wish  him  well  in  his  future 

endeavors. 

have  been  leading  causes  of  bank  failures  in  the  past  two 

We  sincerely  appreciate  the  continuing  trust  and  loyalty  of 

years.  Our  securities  portfolio  consists  of  high  quality, 

our  constituencies—Stoc/f/70/c/ers,  Customers,  Employees 

short-term  investments  that  provide  a  large  cushion  to  meet 

and  Communities.  We  will  work  to  earn  your  continued 

our  liquidity  needs. We  have  many  sources  of  additional 

confidence  as we  thank  you  for  the  privilege  of  serving you! 

liquidity  available  to  us  if  the  need  were  to  arise. 

Very  Sincerely, 

In  the  coming  year  we  intend  to  continue  managing  our 

balance  sheet  growth.  We  plan  to  accomplish  this  by 

funding  loan  portfolio  growth  with  modest  deposit  growth 

and  maturities  and  repayments  from  our  investment 

portfolio.  We  continue  to  place  an  emphasis  on  growing 

the  Company's  commercial  and  commercial  real  estate 

Peter  J. Johnson 

loan  portfolios. 

President/CEO 

Located  in  Gallatin  County,  Bozeman  sits  95  miles  southeast  of 
Helena  and  100  miles  north  of  West  Yellowstone  Park.  Agriculture 
plays  a  major  role  in  the  local  economy,  with  tourism  a  close 
second.  American  Federal  has  had  a  presence  in  Bozeman  for 
30  years  and  recently  opened  a  new  full  service  bank  in  October 
2009.  The  new  branch  is a 20,000  square  foot  state  of  the  art 
office.  Energy  conservation  was  a top  priority  and  the  building 
was  designed  to  exceed  the  International  Energy  Conservation 
Code.  Recently,  the  Montana  Contractors'  Association  presented 
the  architect  and  general  contractor  Excellence  Awards  in 
"Craftsmanship"  and  "Best  Commercial"  categories.  Bozeman's 
economy  continues  to  flourish  with  the  influx  of  retirees  and 
natural  beauty.  Montana  State  University  also  contributes  to 
the  strong  local  economic  growth  with  support  to  a  number 
of  high-tech  firms  who  have  chosen  Bozeman  as their  base. 

^^ms&fni-.L'iSidm 

Eagle  Bancorp MT, Inc.  ::  J 

Directors  &  Executive  Officers 

DIRECTORS 

EXECUTIVE  OFFICERS 

Don  O.  Campbell 
Vice  Chairman  of  the  Board 

Lynn  E.  Dickey 
Retired 

Larry  A.  Dreyer 
Chairman  of  the  Board 

Rick  F.  Hays 
Retired 

Peter  J. Johnson 
President/Chief Executive  Officer 
Eagle  Bancorp  Montana,  Inc. 

James A.  iVtaierle 
Chairman  of  the  Board  of 
Morhson-Maierle,  Inc. 

Thomas  J. iVIcCarvel 
Vice  President  of 
Carroll  College 

; 2010  Annual  Report 

Peter  J, Johnson 
President/Chief  Executive  Officer 
Eagle Bancorp  Montana,  Inc. 

Robert  M.  Evans 
Senior  Vice  President/Chief  Information  Officer/ 
Bank  Security  Officer 

Clint  J. iVlorrison 
Senior  Vice  President/Chief  Financial  Officer 

Michael  C.  iVlundt 
Senior  Vice  President/Chief Lending  Officer 

Rachel  R.  Amdahl 
Senior  Vice  President/Operations 

CORPORATE  SECRETARY 

Charles  H.  Berger 

EAGLE BANCORP 
M O N T A N A, 

I N C. 

AND  SUBSIDIARY 

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS 

and 

REPORT OF ESfDEPENDENT  REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING  FIRM 

June 30, 2010 and 2009 

EAGLE  BANCORP  MONTANA, INC, AND  SUBSIDIARY 

Contents 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

Financial  Statements 

Consolidated  Statements of Financial Condition 

Consolidated Statements of Income 

Consolidated  Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity 

Consolidated  Statements of Cashflows 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 

Page 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

J^ Dam Kinard&Co, PC 

C E R T I F I ED  PUBLIC  .•iCCOUKT/lNTS 

Quality. Integrity. KnoiJikdge. 

First Financial Bank Building 
400 Pine St. Suite 500, Abilene, Texas 79601-5190 

325.672.4000 /  800.S88.2S2S / f;  325.672.7049 

www.dlccpa.C0in 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of 
Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. and  Subsidiary 

We  have  audited  the  accompanying  consolidated  statements  of  financial  condition  of  Eagle  Bancorp 
Montana,  Inc. and  Subsidiary  as of June 30, 2010 and  2009 and the related  consolidated  statemeiits of 
income,  stockholders'  equity  and  cash  flows  for  years  then  ended.  These financial statements  are  the 
responsibility ofthe  Company's management. Our responsibility  is to express an opinion on these  financial 
statements based on our audits. 

We conducted  our audits  in accordance  with the  standards  of the Public  Company Accounting Oversight 
Board  (United  States). Those  standards  require  that  we plan  and perform  the  audits  to  obtain  reasonable 
assurance  about  whether  the financial statements  are free  of  material  misstatement.  The  Company  is not 
required to have, nor were we engaged to perform,  an audit of its intemal control over financial reporting. 
Our audits included  consideration of intemal control over fmancial  reporting as a basis for designing audit 
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the 
effectiveness  of the Company's  intemal  control  over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such 
opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures 
in  the  financial  statements,  assessing  the  accounting  principles  used  and  significant  estimates  made  by 
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial  statement presentation. We believe that our audits 
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. 

In  our  opinion,  the  2010  and  2009 financial statements  referred  to  above  present  fairly,  in  all  material 
respects, the financial  position of Eagle Bancorp  Montana, Inc. and  Subsidiary  as of June 30, 2010 and 
2009, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for years then ended in conformity with accounting 
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. 

\ 

etM*3 

'y K^i^i^Xz^  F^ 
DAVIS KINARD & CO, PC 

Abilene, Texas 
July 29, 2010 

• 1-

EAGLE  BANCORP MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Consolidated  Statements of Financial  Condition 
June 30, 2010 and 2009 
(Dollars in Thousands, Except for Per Share Data) 

Assets 

Cash and due from banks 
Interest bearing deposits in banks 
Federal funds  sold 

Cash and cash equivalents 

Securities  available-for-sale 
Securities held-to-maturity (fair value 

approximates $125 in 2010 and $384 in 2009) 
Preferred  stock - FASB ASC 825, at market value 
FHLB stock restricted, at cost 
Investment in Eagle Bancorp Statutory Trust I 
Mortgage loans held for sale 
Loans receivable, net of deferred  loan fees and 

allowance for loan losses of $1,100 in 2010 and $525 in 2009 

Accrued interest and dividend receivable 
Mortgage servicing rights, net 
Premises and equipment, net 
Cash surrender value oflife  insurance 
Real estate and other assets aquired in settlement of loans 
Other assets 

Liabilities and  Shareholders'  Equity 

Noninterest bearing 
Interest bearing 

Total deposits 

Accrued expenses and other liabilities 
FHLB advances and other borrowings 
Subordinated  debentures 

Total liabilities 

Shareholders'  equity 

Preferred  stock, no par value; 1,000,000 

shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding 

Common stock, $0.01 par value; 8,000,000 shares 

authorized June 30, 2010; 9,000,000 authorized June 30, 2009 
4,083,127 shares issued and outstanding June 30, 2010 
1,223,572 shares issued, 1,076,072 shares outstanding June 30, 2009 

Capital surplus 
Unallocated common stock held by ESOP 
Treasury stock, at cost 
Retained  eamings 
Net accumulated other comprehensive  gain/(loss) 

Total shareholders' equity 

The accompanying notes are an integral part 
of these consolidated financial  statements. 

2010 

2009 

2,543  $ 
966 
-
3,509 

114,528 

125 
-
2,003 
155 
7,695 

169,502 
1,610 
2,337 
15,848 
6,691 
619 
1,117 

2,487 
224 
3,617 
6,328 

82,263 

375 
25 
2,000 
155 
5,349 

167,197 
1,399 
2,208 
13,761 
6,496 
-
2,153 

325,739 $ 

289,709 

1,8,376 $ 

179,563 
197,939 

2,989 
67,224 
5,155 
273,307 

15,002 
172,197 
187,199 

2,507 
67,056 
5,155 
261,917 

41 
22,104 
(1,889) 
-
30,652 
1,524 
52,432 

12 
4,564 
(18) 
(5,034) 
28,850 
(582) 
27,792 

325,739 $ 

289,709 

EAGLE BANCORP MONTANA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY 
Consolidated Statements of Income 
Years Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 
(Dollars in Thousands, Except for Per Share Data) 

2010 

2009 

Interest and dividend  income 

Loans, including fees 
Securities  available-for-sale 
Securities held- to-maturity 
Trust preferred  securities 
Deposits with banks 

Total interest income 

Interest  expense 
Deposits 
FHLB advances and other borrowings 
Subordinated debentures 
Total interest expense 

Net interest  income 

Provision for loan losses 

Net interest income after  provision for loan losses 

Noninterest  income 

Service charges on deposit accounts 
Net gain on sale of loans 
Mortgage loan service fees 
Net realized gain on sales of available for sale securities 
Net gain (loss) on preferred  stock - FASB ASC 825 
Other income 

Total noninterest income 

Noninterest  expenses 

Salaries and employee benefits 
Occupancy and equipment expense 
Data processing 
Advertising 
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights 
Federal insurance premiums 
Postage 
Legal, accounting, and examination  fees 
Consulting fees 
ATM processing 
Other expense 

Total noninterest expenses 

Income before income taxes 

Income tax expense 

Net income 

Basic eamings per share* 

Diluted eamings per share * 

10,857  $ 
4,003 
11 
9 
27 
14,907 

2,161 
2,635 
309 
5,105 

9,802 

715 

9,087 

765 
1,280 
770 
33 
84 
661 
3,593 

4,750 
1,177 
407 
438 
487 
275 
144 
318 
170 
69 
996 
9,231 

3,449 

1,035 

2,414 $ 

0.60  S 

; 

0.54 $ 

11,411 
3,893 
20 
9 
15 
15,348 

3,161 
2,645 
309 
6,115 

9,233 

257 

8,976 

745 
2,216 
628 
54 
(1,296) 
652 
2,999 

4,411 
900 
370 
394 
598 
307 
151 
231 
114 
62 
1,025 
8,563 

3,412 

1,024 

2,388 

0.59 

0.52 

* per share data is calculated on a converted basis using a 3.8 to  1.0 exchange ratio 
The accompanying notes are an integral part 
of these consolidated financial  statements. 

-3-

EAGLE  BANCORP  MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Consolidated  Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity 
Years Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 
(Dollars in Thousands, Except for Per Share Data) 

Balance  at June 30,2008 

$ 

- 

$ 

12 

Preferred 
Stock 

Common 
Stock 

Net income 

Change in net unrealized depreciation on 

available for sale securities and cash flow hedges, net 

Total comprehensive  income 

Dividends paid ($ 1.02 per share) 

Treasury stock purchased (760 shares @ $27.00) 

EITF No. 06-4 & 06-10 
ESOP shares allocated or committed 

to be released for allocation (4,600) shares 

Balance  at June 30,2009 

$ 

- 

$ 

12 

Net income 

Change in net unrealized depreciation on 

available for  sale securities and cash flow hedges, net 

Total comprehensive  income 

Dividends paid 

Treasury stock purchased (805 shares (g  $28.25) 

Stock conversion 

Stock sold/issued 

ESOP allocated prior to conversion 
ESOP shares allocated or committed 

tobereleasedfor  allocation (8,214) shares 

(12) 

41 

Balance at June 30,2010 

$ 

- 

$ 

41 

The accompanying notes are an integral part 
of these consolidated financial  statements. 

Additional 
Paid-in 
Capital 

Unallocated 
ESOP 
Shares 

Treasury 
Stock 

Retained 
Eamings 

Accumulated 
Other 
Comprehensive 
Loss 

Total 

4,487  $ 

(55)$ 

(5,013) $ 

27,025  $ 

(822) $ 

25,634 

240 

2,388 

(435) 

(128) 

(21) 

2,388 

240 

2,628 

(435) 

(21) 

(128) 

114 

77 

37 

4,564  $ 

(18)$ 

(5,034) $ 

28,850  $ 

(582) $ 

27,792 

2,414 

(612) 

2,106 

2,414 

2,106 

4,520 

(612) 

(22) 

480 

20,123 

68 

83 

(22) 

5,056 

(4,564) 

22,053 

(1,971) 

50 

1 

18 

82 

22,104  $ 

(1,889)  $ 

- 

$ 

30,652  $ 

1,524  $ 

52,432 

EAGLE  BANCORP MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Consolidated  Statements of Cash Flows 
Years Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 
(Dollars in Thousands, Except for Per Share Data) 

Cash flows from  operating  activities 

Net income 
Adjustments  to reconcile net income to 

net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 

Provision for loan losses 
Depreciation 
Net amortization of securities premium & discounts 
Amortization of capitalized mortgage servicing rights 
Net gain on sale of loans 
Net realized gain on sales of available-for-sale  securities 
Net recognized (gain) loss on preferred  stock -  FASB ASC 825 
Net loss on sale of foreclosed real estate 
Net loss on sale/disposal of fixed assets 
Appreciation in cash surrender value of life insurance, net 
Net change in 

Loans held for sale 
Accmed interest receivable 
Other assets 
Accmed expenses and other liabilities 

Net cash provided by operating activities 

Cash flows from  investing  activities 

Activity in available-for-sale  securities 

Sales 
Maturities, prepayments and calls 
Purchases 

Activity in held to maturity securities 
Maturities, prepayments and calls 

FHLB stock purchased 
Loan originations and principal collections, net 
Proceeds from  sale of foreclosed  real estate 
Additions to premises and equipment 

Net cash used in investing activities 

Cash flows from  financing  activities 

Net increase in deposits 
Net change in federal  funds  purchased 
Net change in advances from the FHLB and other borrowings 
Purchase of treasury stock, at cost 
Issuance of common stock 
Purchase ESOP shares 
Dividends paid 

Net cash provided by flnancing activities 

Net change in cash and  cash  equivalents 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 

Cash and  cash equivalents at end of year 

The accompanying notes are an integral part 
of these consolidated financial statements. 

-5-

2010 

2009 

2,414  $ 

2,388 

715 
651 
393 
487 
(1,280) 
(33) 
(84) 
-

2 
(195) 

(793) 
(211) 
1,084 
(748) 
2,402 

8,928 
11,556 
(50,266) 

250 

(3) 
(3,820) 
28 
(2,771) 
(36,098) 

10,740 
-
168 
(22) 
22,574 
(1,971) 
(612) 

30,877 

(2,819) 

6,328 

3,509  $ 

257 
482 
163 
598 
(2,216) 
(54) 
1,296 
2 

-

(211) 

4,257 
27 
(1,603) 
344 

5,730 

5,298 
11,182 
(20,114) 

322 
(285) 
(471) 
13 
(6,163) 
(10,218) 

8,348 
(3,000) 
1,834 
(21) 
-
-

(435) 
6,726 

2,238 

4,090 

6,328 

EAGLE  BANCORP MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Notes to Consolidated Financial  Statements 
June 30, 2010 and 2009 

NOTE  1:  Summary  of Significant  Accounting  Policies 

Nature of Operations 

On April  5, 2010, Eagle Bancorp  completed its second-step  conversion  from  the  partially-public 
mutual holding company  stmcture to the ftilly  publicly-owned  stock holding company  stmcture. 
As  part  of  that  transaction  it  also  completed  a  related  stock  offering.  As  a  result  of  the 
conversion  and offering,  Eagle Bancorp Montana,  Inc. ("the  Company",  or "Eagle") became the 
stock holding  company  for  American  Federal  Savings  Bank  ("the  Bank"),  and  Eagle  Financial 
MHC  and  Eagle  Bancorp  ceased  to  exist.  The  Company  sold  a  total  of  2,464,274  shares  of 
common stock at a purchase price of $10.00 per share in the offering  for gross proceeds of $24.6 
million.  Concurrent with the completion ofthe  offering,  shares of Eagle Bancorp common stock 
owned by the public were  exchanged.  Stockholders  of Eagle Bancorp  received  3.800  shares of 
the  Company's  common  stock  for  each  share  of Eagle  Bancorp  common  stock  that  they  owned 
immediately prior to completion ofthe  transaction. 

The  Company's  Employee  Stock  Ownership  Plan  ("ESOP"),  which  purchased  shares  in  the 
Offering,  was  authorized  to  purchase  up  to  12% ofthe  shares  sold  in the  Offering,  or  197,142 
shares.  The ESOP completed its purchase of all such authorized shares in the Offering,  at a total 
cost of $1,971,420. 

The Bank  is a federally  chartered  savings bank  subject  to the regulations  of the  Office  of  Thrift 
Supervision  ("OTS").  The  Bank  is  a member  of  the  Federal  Home  Loan  Bank  System  and  its 
deposit  accounts  are  insured  to  the  applicable  limits  by  the  Federal  Deposit  Insurance 
Corporation  ("FDIC"). 

The  Bank  is  headquartered  in  Helena,  Montana,  and  operates  additional  branches  in  Butte, 
Bozeman,  and  Townsend,  Montana.  The  Bank's  market  area  is  concentrated  in  south  central 
Montana, to which it primarily  offers  commercial,  residential,  and consumer loans.  The  Bank's 
principal business  is accepting  deposits  and,  together  with  funds  generated  from  operations  and 
borrowings, investing in various types of loans and securities. 

Collectively,  Eagle  Bancorp  Montana  Inc.,  and  the  Bank  are  referred  to  herein  as  "the 
Company." 

Principles of Consolidation 

The  consolidated  fmancial  statements  include  the  accounts  of Eagle  Bancorp  Montana  Inc. and 
the  Bank.  All  significant  intercompany  transactions  and  balances  have  been  eliminated  in 
consolidation. 

Use of Estimates 

In  preparing  financial  statements  in  conformity  with  U.S.  generally  accepted  accounting 
principles,  management  is  required  to  make  estimates  and  assumptions  that  affect  the  reported 
amounts  of  assets  and  liabilities  as  of  the  date  of  the  balance  sheet  and  reported  amounts  of 
revenues  and  expenses  during  the  reporting  period.  Actual  results  could  differ  from  those 
estimates.  Material  estimates  that  are particularly  susceptible  to  significant  change  in  the  near 
term relate to the determination  of the  allowance  for  loan  losses, mortgage  servicing rights, and 
the valuation  of foreclosed  assets.  In connection  with  the  determination  of the  estimated  losses 
on  loans,  foreclosed  assets,  and  valuation  of  mortgage  servicing  rights,  management  obtains 
independent appraisals and valuations. 

-6-

EAGLE  BANCORP  MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Notes to Consolidated Financial  Statements 
June 30, 2010 and 2009 

NOTE  I:  Summary  of Significant  Accounting  Policies -  continued 

Significant  Group Concentrations  of Credit Risk 

Most  of  the  Company's  business  activity  is  with  customers  located  within  the  south-central 
Montana  area.  Note  3  discusses  the  types  of  securities  that  the  Company  invests  in.  Note  4 
discusses  the  types  of  lending  that  the  Company  engages  in.  The  Company  does not have  any 
significant  concentrations to any one industry or customer. 

The  Company  carries  certain  assets  with  other  financial  institutions  which  are  subject  to  credit 
risk  by  the  amount  such  assets  exceed  federal  deposit  insurance  limits.  At  June  30,  2010  and 
June  30, 2009, no  account  balances  were  held  with  correspondent  banks  that  were  in  excess  of 
FDIC  insured  levels.  Also, from  time  to time, the  Company  is due  amounts  in excess  of FDIC 
insurance  limits  for  checks  and  transit  items.  Management  monitors  the  financial  stability  of 
correspondent  banks  and  considers  amounts  advanced  in  excess  of  FDIC  insurance  limits  to 
present no significant  additional risk to the Company. 

Cash and Cash  Equivalents 

For  the  purpose  of  presentation  in  the  consolidated  statements  of  cash  flows,  cash  and  cash 
equivalents  are  defined  as  those  amounts  included  in the  balance  sheet  captions  "cash  and  due 
from  banks,"  "interest bearing  deposits  in banks," and "federal  fiinds  sold" all of which  mature 
within ninety days. 

The  Bank  is required  to maintain  a reserve  balance  with  the  Federal  Reserve  Bank.  The  Bank 
properly  maintained  amounts  in excess  of required  reserves  of $50,000  as  of June 30, 2010  and 
2009. 

Investment Securities 

The  Company  designates  debt  and  equity  securities  as  held-to-maturity,  available-for-sale,  or 
trading. 

Held-to-maturity  -  Debt  investment  securities  that  management  has  the  positive  intent  and 
ability to hold until maturity  are classified  as held-to-maturity  and are carried  at their remaining 
unpaid  principal  balance, net  of unamortized  premiums  or unaccreted  discounts.  Premiums  are 
amortized  and  discounts  are  accreted  using  the  interest  method  over  the period  remaining  until 
maturity. 

Available-for-sale  -  Investment  securities  that  will  be  held  for  indefmite  periods  of  time, 
including  securities  that  may  be  sold  in  response  to  changes  in  market  interest  or  prepayment 
rates,  need  for  liquidity,  and  changes  in  the  availability  of  and  the  yield  of  altemative 
investments,  are  classified  as  available-for-sale.  These  assets  are  carried  at  fair  value. 
Unrealized  gains and losses, net of tax, are reported as other comprehensive  income.  Gains and 
losses  on  the  sale  of  available-for-sale  securities  are recorded  on the  trade  date  and  determined 
using the specific  identification  method. 

Declines  in the  fair  value  of  individual  held-to-maturity  and  available-for-sale  securities  below 
their  cost  that  are  other  than  temporary  are  recognized  by  write-downs  of  the  individual 
securities to their fair value.  Such write-downs would be included in eamings as realized losses. 

EAGLE  BANCORP  MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Notes to Consolidated Financial  Statements 
June 30, 2010 and 2009 

NOTE  1:  Summary  of Significant  Accounting Policies -  continued 

Trading ~ No investment securities were designated as trading at June 30, 2010 and 2009. 

Securities  -  FASB  ASC  825  -  Beginning  fiscal  year,  July  1,  2007  the  Company  elected  to 
account  for  its  preferred  stock  under,  FASB  ASC  825  which  allows  an  entity  the  irrevocable 
option to  elect  fair  value  for  the  initial  and  subsequent  measurement  for  certain  financial  assets 
and  liabilities  on  a contract-by-contract  basis.  Subsequent  changes  in  fair  value  of these  assets 
are  recognized  in  eaming  when  incurred.  On  July  1,  2007  a  charge  to  retained  eamings  for 
$118,000 was recorded  in accordance  with the  implementation  ofFASB  ASC  825 to record the 
unrealized loss (net of taxes) on preferred  stock at that date. 

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock 

The  Company's  investment  in  Federal  Home  Loan  Bank  ("FHLB")  stock  is  a  restricted 
investment  carried  at  cost  ($100  per  share  par  value),  which  approximates  its  fair  value.  As  a 
member  of  the  FHLB  system,  the  Company  is  required  to  maintain  a  minimum  level  of 
investment in FHLB stock based on specific percentages of its outstanding FHLB advances.  The 
Company may request redemption at par value of any stock in excess ofthe  amount it is required 
to  hold.  Stock  redemptions  are  made  at  the  discretion  of  the  FHLB.  The  Bank  redeemed  no 
FHLB shares during the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. 

Mortgage Loans  Held-for-Sale 

Mortgage  loans originated and intended for  sale in the secondary  market  are carried at the  lower 
of  cost  or  estimated  market  value,  determined  in  aggregate,  plus  the  fair  value  of  associated 
derivative  financial  instraments.  Net  unrealized  losses,  if  any,  are  recognized  in  a  valuation 
allowance by a charge to income. 

Loans 

The  Company  grants  mortgage,  commercial  and  consumer  loans  to  customers.  A  substantial 
portion  of  the  loan  portfolio  is  represented  by  mortgage  loans  in  south  central  Montana.  The 
ability  of  the  Company's  debtors  to  honor  their  contracts  is  dependent  upon  the  general 
economic conditions in this area. 

Loans receivable that management has the intent and ability to hold until maturity are reported at 
the  outstanding  principal  balance  adjusted  for  any  charge-offs,  allowance  for  loan  losses,  and 
any  deferred  fees  or  costs  on  originated  loans  and  unamortized  premiums  or  unaccreted 
discounts  on purchased  loans.  Loan  origination  fees,  net  of  certain  direct  origination  costs  are 
deferred  and amortized over the contractual  life  of the loan,  as an adjustment  of the yield, using 
the interest method. 

The accraal of interest on loans is discontinued  at the time the loan is 90 days delinquent  unless 
the  credit  is well  secured  and  in process  of collection.  Personal  loans  are typically  charged  off 
no later than  180 days past due.  Past due status is based on the contractual terms ofthe  loan.  In 
all cases, loans are placed on nonaccraal or charged off at an earlier date if collection of principal 
or interest is considered  doubtful. 

EAGLE  BANCORP  MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Notes to Consolidated Financial  Statements 
June 30, 2010 and 2009 

NOTE  I:  Summary  of Significant  Accounting  Policies -  continued 

Loans -  continued 

All  interest  accraed  but  not  collected  for  loans  that  are  placed  on  nonaccraal  or  charged  off  is 
reversed  against  interest  income.  The  interest  on these  loans  is accounted  for  on the  cash-basis 
or  cost-recovery  method,  until  qualifying  for  retum  to  accraal.  Loans  are  retumed  to  accraal 
status  when  all  the  principal  and  interest  amounts  contractually  due  are  brought  current  and 
future payments are reasonably  assured. 

Allowance for Loan Losses 

The  allowance  for  loan  losses  is  established  as  losses  are  estimated  to have  occurred  through  a 
provision  for  loan  losses  charged  to  eamings.  Loan  losses  are  charged  against  the  allowance 
when  management  believes  the  uncollectibility  of  a  loan  balance  is  confirmed.  Subsequent 
recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. 

The allowance  for  loan losses  is evaluated  on a regular basis by management  and is based upon 
management's  periodic  review  of the  collectibility  of the  loans  in light  of historical  experience, 
the  nature  and  volume  of  the  loan  portfolio,  adverse  situations  that  may  affect  the  borrower's 
ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions. 
This evaluation  is inherently  subjective  as it requires estimates that are susceptible to  significant 
revisions as more information  becomes available. 

The allowance consists of specific,  general  and unallocated  components.  For such loans that are 
classified  as impaired,  an allowance  is established when the discounted  cash flows (or  collateral 
value  or  observable  market  price)  of the  impaired  loan  is  lower  than  the  carrying  value  of  that 
loan.  The  general  component  covers  non-classified  loans  and  is  based  on  historical  loss 
experience  adjusted  for  qualitative  factors.  An  unallocated  component  is  maintained  to  cover 
uncertainties  that  could  affect  management's  estimate  of  probable  losses.  The  unallocated 
component  of  the  allowance  reflects  the  margin  of  imprecision  inherent  in  the  underlying 
assumptions used in the methodologies  for estimating specific  and general losses in the portfolio. 

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current  information  and events, it is probable that 
the Company will be imable to collect the  scheduled payments  of principal  or interest when  due 
according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.  Factors considered by management  in 
determining  impairment  include  payment  status,  collateral  value,  and  the  probability  of 
collecting  scheduled  principal  and  interest  payments  when  due.  Loans  that  experience 
insignificant  payment  delays  and  payment  shortfalls  generally  are  not  classified  as  impaired. 
Management determines the significance  of payment delays and payment shortfalls  on a case-by-
case basis, taking into consideration  all the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, 
including the length of delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower's prior payment record, and 
Impairment  is 
the  amount  of  the  shortfall  in  relation  to  the  principal  and  interest  owed. 
measured  on  a  loan  by  loan  basis  for  commercial  and  constraction  loans  by  either  the  present 
value  of  expected  future  cash  flows  discounted  at  the  loan's  effective  interest  rate,  the  loan's 
obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral  dependent. 

Large  groups  of  smaller  balance  homogeneous  loans  are  collectively  evaluated  for  impairment. 
Accordingly,  the  Company  does  not  separately  identify  individual  consumer  and  residential 
loans for impairment disclosures, unless such loans are subject of a restracturing  agreement. 

EAGLE  BANCORP  MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Notes to Consolidated Financial  Statements 
June 30, 2010 and 2009 

NOTE  1:  Summary  of Significant  Accounting Policies -  continued 

Mortgage Servicing Rights 

Servicing  assets  are recognized  as separate  assets when rights  are  acquired through purchase  or 
through  sale of flnancial assets.  Generally, purchased  servicing rights are capitalized  at the cost 
to acquire the rights.  For sales of mortgage loans, a portion ofthe  cost of originating the loan is 
allocated to the servicing right based on relative fair value.  Fair value is based on a market price 
valuation model  that  calculates  the present  value  of estimated  future  net  servicing  income.  The 
valuation  model  incorporates  assumptions  that  market  participants  would  use  in  estimating 
fiiture net servicing  income, such as the cost to service, the  discount rate, the  custodial  eamings 
rate, an inflation  rate, ancillary income, prepayment  speeds and default rates and losses. 

Servicing assets are evaluated for impairment based upon the fair value ofthe  rights as compared 
to  amortized  cost. 
Impairment  is  determined  by  stratifying  rights  into  tranches  based  on 
predominant  characteristics,  such  as  interest  rate,  loan  type  and  investor  type.  Impairment  is 
recognized  through  a valuation  allowance  for  an  individual  tranche,  to  the  extent  that  the  fair 
value is less than the capitalized  amount for the tranches.  Ifthe  Bank later determines that all or 
a portion ofthe  impairment no longer exists for a particular tranche, a reduction ofthe  allowance 
may  be  recorded  as  an  increase  to  income.  Capitalized  servicing  rights  are  reported  in  other 
assets  and  are  amortized  into  noninterest  income  in  proportion  to,  and  over  the  period  of,  the 
estimated future net servicing income ofthe  underlying financial assets. 

Servicing  fee  income  is  recorded  for  fees  eamed  for  servicing  loans.  The  fees  are  based  on  a 
contractual  percentage  of  the  outstanding  principal  and  are  recorded  as  income  when  eamed. 
The amortization of mortgage servicing rights is netted against loan servicing fee income. 

Cash Surrender  Value of Life  Insurance 

Life  insurance  policies  are  initially  recorded  at  cost  at  the  date  of  purchase.  Subsequent  to 
purchase,  the  policies  are  periodically  adjusted  for  fair  value.  The  adjustment  to  fair  value 
increases or decreases the carrying value ofthe  policies and is recorded as an income or expense 
on  the  consolidated  statement  of  income.  For  the  years  ended  June  30,  2010  and  2009  there 
were  no  adjustments  to  fair  value  that  were  outside  the  normal  appreciation  in  cash  surrender 
value. 

Foreclosed Assets 

Assets  acquired  through,  or  in  lieu  of,  loan  foreclosure  are  initially  recorded  fair  value  less 
estimated  selling  cost at the date of foreclosure.  All vsTite-downs based on the asset's  fair  value 
at  the  date  of  acquisition  are  charged  to  the  allowance  for  loan  losses.  After  foreclosure, 
property  held  for  sale is carried  at fair  value  less cost  to  sell.  Impainnent  losses  on property to 
be  held  and  used  are  measured  as  the  amount  by  which  the  carrying  amount  of  a  property 
exceeds its fair value.  Costs of significant  property improvements are capitalized, whereas  costs 
relating  to  holding  property  are  expensed.  Valuations  are  periodically  performed  by 
management,  and  any  subsequent  write-downs  are  recorded  as  a  charge  to  operations,  if 
necessary, to reduce the carrying value of a property to the lower of its cost or fair value less cost 
to sell. 

-10-

EAGLE  BANCORP MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Notes to Consolidated Financial  Statements 
June 30, 2010 and 2009 

NOTE  I:  Summary  of Significant  Accounting Policies -  continued 

Premises and Equipment 

Land  is  carried  at  cost.  Property  and  equipment  is  recorded  at  cost  less  accumulated 
depreciation.  Depreciation  is computed  using  the  straight-line  method  over the  expected  usefiil 
lives  of  the  assets,  ranging  from  3  to  35  years.  The  costs  of  maintenance  and  repairs  are 
expensed as incurred, while major  expenditures for renewals and betterments are capitalized. 

Income  Taxes 

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method.  Accordingly, deferred  taxes 
are  recognized  for  the  estimated  future  tax  effects  attributable  to  "temporary  differences" 
between  the  financial  statement  carrying  amounts  and  the  tax  basis  of  existing  assets  and 
liabilities.  Deferred  tax  assets  and  liabilities  are  measured  using  enacted  tax  rates  expected  to 
apply  to  taxable  income  in  the  years  in  which  the  temporary  differences  are  expected  to  be 
recovered  or settled.  The  effect  on deferred  tax  assets  and  liabilities  of a change  in tax  laws or 
rates  is recognized  in  income  tax  expense  in the  period  that  includes  the  enactment  date  of the 
change.  A  deferred  tax  liability  is  recognized  for  all  temporary  differences  that  will  result  in 
future  taxable  income.  A deferred  tax asset is recognized  for  all temporary  differences  that will 
result  in  future  tax  deductions,  subject  to  reduction  of  the  asset  by  a  valuation  allowance  in 
certain  circumstances.  This  valuation  allowance  is  recognized  if,  based  on  an  analysis  of 
available  evidence,  management  determines  that  it  is more  likely than  not  that  some portion  or 
all of the  deferred  tax asset will not be realized.  The valuation  allowance  is subject  to  ongoing 
adjustment  based  on  changes  in  circumstances  that  affect  management's  judgment  about  the 
realizability  of  the  deferred  tax  asset.  Adjustments  to  increase  or  decrease  the  valuation 
allowance are charged or credited, respectively, to income tax expense. 

Treasury Stock 

Treasury  stock  is  accounted  for  on  the  cost  method  and  consists  of  no  shares  in  2010  and 
148,260 shares in 2009. 

Advertising  Costs 

The  Company  expenses  advertising  costs  as  they  are  incurred.  Advertising  costs  were 
approximately  $438,000 and $394,000 for the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. 

Employee Stock Ownership Plan 

Compensation  expense recognized  for  the  Company's  ESOP  equals  the  fair  value of shares that 
have  been  allocated  or  committed  to  be  released  for  allocation  to  participants.  Any  difference 
between  the  fair  value  of  the  shares  at  the  time  and  the  ESOP's  original  acquisition  cost  is 
charged or credited to stockholders'  equity  (capital  surplus).  The cost of ESOP  shares that have 
not yet been allocated or committed to be released is deducted from  stockholders'  equity. 

-11-

EAGLE  BANCORP  MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Notes to Consolidated Financial  Statements 
June 30, 2010 and 2009 

NOTE  I:  Summary  of Significant  Accounting Policies -  continued 

Earnings Per  Share 

Basic  eamings per  share  ("EPS")  is  calculated by  dividing net  income by the weighted  average 
number of common  shares outstanding  for the period.  Diluted EPS is calculated by dividing net 
income by the weighted  average number  of common  shares used to compute basic EPS plus the 
incremental  amount  of  potential  common  stock  determined  by  the treasury  stock  method.  For 
purposes  of computing EPS, outstanding  common  shares  include all shares  issued to the  Mutual 
Holding  Company  but  exclude  ESOP  shares  that  have  not  been  allocated  or  committed  to  be 
released  for  allocation  to  participants.  Due  to  the  conversion  and  related  stock  offering 
occurring on April 5, 2010 all EPS calculations are prepared using a 3.8 to  1.0 exchange ratio. 

Financial Instruments 

All  derivative  financial  instraments  that  qualify  for  hedge  accounting  are  recognized  in  the 
financial  statements  and  measured  at  fair  value  regardless  of  the  purpose  or  intent  for  holding 
them.  Changes in the fair value of derivative  financial  instraments used as cash flow hedges are 
recognized  as a component of comprehensive  income.  At June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company 
was holding forward  delivery commitments that qualify  as derivative financial instraments. 

The  carrying  value  of  the  Company's  financial  instraments  approximates  fair  value.  The  fair 
value  of  the  Company's  financial  instraments  is  generally  determined  by  a  third  party's 
valuation ofthe  imderlying asset. 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements 

GAAP  Codification  -  On July  1, 2009, the FASB's  GAAP  Codification  became  effective  as the 
sole  authoritative  source  of  GAAP.  This  codification  reorganizes  current  GAAP  for  non 
govemmental  entities  into  a topical  index  to  facilitate  accounting  research  and  to provide  users 
additional  assurance  that  they  have  referenced  all  related  literature  pertaining  to  a  given  topic. 
Existing  GAAP  prior  to  the  Codification  was  not  altered  in  the  compilation  of  the  GAAP 
Codification. 
The  GAAP  Codification  encompasses  all  FASB  Statements  of  Financial 
Accounting  Standards,  Emerging  Issues  Task  Force  statements,  FASB  Staff  Positions,  FASB 
Interpretations, FASB Derivative Implementation  Guides, American Institute  of Certified  Public 
Accountants  Statement  of  Positions,  Accounting  Principles  Board  Opinions  and  Accounting 
Research  Bulletins  along  with  the  remaining  body  of  GAAP  effective  as  of  June 30,  2009. 
Financial  Statements  issued  for  all interim and  annual periods  ending  after  September  15, 2009, 
will  need  to  reference  accounting  guidance  embodied  in  the  Codification  as  opposed  to 
referencing  the previously authoritative pronouncements. 

On  November  14,  2008,  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  ("SEC")  issued  its  long-
anticipated  proposed  Intemational  Financial  Reporting  Standards  ("IFRS")  roadmap  outiining 
milestones  that,  if  achieved,  could  lead  to  mandatory  transition  to  IFRS  for  U.S.  domestic 
registrants  starting  in 2014.  IFRS  is a comprehensive  series  of accounting  standards  published 
by  the  Intemational  Accounting  Standards  Board  ("lASB").  Under  the proposed  roadmap, the 
Company  could  be  required  through  its  parent  company  to  prepare  financial  statements  in 
accordance with IFRS, and the SEC will make a determination  in 2011 regarding the mandatory 
adoption  of  IFRS  for  U.S. domestic  registrants.  Management  is  currently  assessing  the  impact 
that  this potential  change would  have  on the  Company's  consolidated  financial  statements, and 
will continue to monitor the development ofthe  potential implementation  of IFRS. 

-12-

EAGLE  BANCORP  MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Notes to Consolidated Financial  Statements 
June 30, 2010 and 2009 

NOTE  I:  Summary  of Significant  Accounting Policies -  continued 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements -  continued 

In  April  2009,  the  FASB  issued  new  guidance  impacting  ASC  Topic  820,  Fair  Value 
Measurements  and  Disclosures.  This  ASC  provides  additional  guidance  in  determining  fair 
values  when  there  is no  active market  or where  the price inputs  being used  represent  distressed 
sales.  It reaffirms  the need to use judgment  to ascertain  if a formerly  active market has become 
inactive  and  in  determining  fair  values  when  markets  have  become  inactive.  The  adoption  of 
this new guidance did not have a material effect  on Company's  results ofoperations  or financial 
position. 

In April 2009, the FASB issued new guidance impacting ASC 825-10-50, Financial Instruments, 
which  relates  to  fair  value  disclosures  for  any  financial  instraments  that  are  not  currently 
reflected  on  the  balance  sheet  of  companies  at  fair  value.  This  guidance  amended  existing 
GAAP  to  require  disclosures  about  fair  value  of  flnancial  instraments  for  interim  reporting 
periods of publicly  traded  companies  as well as in annual financial statements.  This guidance  is 
effective  for interim and annual periods ending after  June  15, 2009.  The Company has presented 
the necessary disclosures in Note  18 herein. 

In  June  2009, the  FASB  issued  new  authoritative  accounting  guidance  under  ASC  Topic  810, 
Consolidation  , which  amends  prior  guidance  to  change  how  a  company  determines  when  an 
entity  that  is  insufficiently  capitalized  or  is  not  controlled  through  voting  (or  similar  rights) 
should  be  consolidated.  The  determination  of whether  a company  is required  to  consolidate  an 
entity is based on, among other things, an entity's purpose and design and a company's  ability to 
direct  the  activities  of  the  entity  that  most  significantly 
impact  the  entity's  economic 
performance.  The  new  authoritative  accounting  guidance  requires  additional  disclosures  about 
the  reporting  entity's  involvement  with  variable-interest  entities  and  any  significant  changes  in 
risk  exposure  due  to  that  involvement  as  well  as  its  affect  on  the  entity's  financial 
statements.  The  new  authoritative  accounting  guidance  under  ASC  Topic  810 will be  effective 
January  1, 2010  and  is  not  expected  to  have  a  significant  impact  on  the  Company's  financial 
statements. 

In  June  2009, the  FASB  issued  ASC  860,  Transfers  and Servicing, to  improve  the  information 
included in an entity's financial  statements about a transfer  of financial  assets and the effects  ofa 
transfer  on its financial position, financial performance  and cash  flows.  The guidance  eliminates 
the  exceptions  for  qualifying  special-purpose  entities  from  the  consolidation  guidance  and  the 
exception  that permitted  sale  accounting  for  certain  mortgage  securitizations  when  a  transferor 
has  not  surrendered  control  over  the  transferred  financial  assets.  In  addition,  the  amendments 
require enhanced disclosures  about the risks that a transferor  continues to be exposed to because 
of  its  continuing  involvement  in  transferred  financial  assets.  The  guidance  is  effective  for  the 
first  reporting  period  (including  interim  periods)  that  begins  after  November  15,  2009.  The 
Company  does  not  expect  that  the  adoption  of  this  guidance  will  have  a  material  effect  on  its 
financial  position, results ofoperations  or cash flows. 

-13-

EAGLE  BANCORP  MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Notes to Consolidated Financial  Statements 
June 30, 2010 and 2009 

NOTE  1:  Summary  of Significant  Accounting Policies -  continued 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements -  continued 

In August 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-05, Fair  Value Measurements and Disclosures 
(Topic  820)  -  Measuring  Liabilities  at  Fair  Value.  This  ASU  provides  amendments  for  fair 
value  measurements  of  liabilities.  It  provides  clarification  that  in  circumstances  in  which  a 
quoted  price  in  an  active  market  for  the  identical  liability  is not  available,  a reporting  entity  is 
required  to  measure  fair  value  using  one  or  more  techniques.  ASU  2009-05  also  clarifies  that 
when estimating a fair  value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to include a separate 
input  or  adjustment  to  other  inputs  relating  to  the  existence  of  a  restriction  that  prevents  the 
transfer  ofthe  liability.  ASU 2009-05 is effective  for the first reporting period (including interim 
periods) beginning  after  issuance  or fourth  quarter  2009.  The  adoption  of the  guidance  did not 
have a material effect  on the Company's  consolidated financial position or results  ofoperations. 

The  FASB  issued  new  authoritative  accounting  guidance  under  ASC  Topic  855,  Subsequent 
Events, which established general standards of accounting  for and disclosure of events that occur 
after  the balance  sheet  date but before  financial  statements  are  issued  or available  to be  issued. 
This guidance sets forth  (i) the period after the balance sheet date during which management  ofa 
reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or 
disclosure  in  the  financial  statements,  (ii)  the  circumstances  under  which  an  entity  should 
recognize  events or transactions  occurring  after  the balance  sheet date in its  financial  statements 
and  (iii)  the  disclosures  that  an  entity  should  make  about  events  or  transactions  that  occurred 
after  the balance  sheet date. This new guidance was effective  for the period  ended June 30, 2010 
and did not have a significant  impact on the Company's consolidated financial  statements 

Reclassifications 

Certain 2009 amounts have been reclassified  to conform to the 2010 presentation. 

NOTE  2:  Earmngs  Per  Share 

The  following  table  sets  forth  the  computation  of  basic  and  diluted  eamings  per  share  for  the 
years ended June 30: 

(In Thousands) 
Weighted average shares outstanding during the 

year on which basic eamings per share is calculated 
Add: weighted average of stock held in treasury 
Average outstanding shares on which 

2010 

2009 

4,035,183 
430,778 

4,074,556 
563,388 

diluted eamings per share is calculated 

4,465,961 

4,637,944 

Net income applicable to common stockholders 
Basic eamings per share 
Diluted eamings per share 

$ 

$ 

$_ 

2,414  $ 
0.60  $ 
0.54  $ 

2,338 
0.59 
0.52 

-14-

EAGLE  BANCORP MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Notes to Consolidated Financial  Statements 
June 30, 2010 and 2009 

NOTE 3:  Securities 

The  Company's  investment  policy  requires  that  the  Company  purchase  only  high-grade 
investment  securities.  Most  municipal  obligations  are  categorized  as  "AAA"  or  better  by  a 
nationally  recognized  statistical  rating  organization.  These  ratings  are  achieved  because  the 
securities  are backed by the full  faith  and credit ofthe  municipality  and also supported by third-
party  credit  insurance  policies.  Mortgage  backed  securities  and  collateralized  mortgage 
obligations  are  issued  by  govemment  sponsored  corporations,  including  Federal  Home  Loan 
Mortgage  Corporation,  Fannie  Mae,  and  the  Guaranteed  National  Mortgage  Association.  The 
amortized  cost and estimated  fair  values of securities, together with umealized  gains  and losses, 
are as follows: 

-15-

E A G LE  B A N C O RP  MONTANA,  INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Notes  to Consolidated  Financial  Statements 
June  30, 2010  and  2009 

N O TE  3:  Securities  -  continued 

(Dollars in  Thousands) 
Available for  Sale 

U.S.  Govemment and agency 
Municipal  obligations 
Corporate  obligations 
Mortgage-backed  securites - government-backed 
Private lable CMOs 
CMOs - govemment backed 

Total securities available for sale 

Held to  Maturitv 

Municipal  obligations 

Total securities held to maturity 

Securities ASC  825 
Preferred  stock 

(Dollars in  Thousands) 
Available for  Sale 

June 30, 

2010 

Amortized 
Cost 

Gross 
Unrealized 
Gains 

Gross 
Unrealized 
Losses 

Estimated 
Market 
Value 

31,852  $ 
35,181 
7,110 
1,690 
957 
35,902 

418 
752 
341 
65 

-
963 

$ 

(29)  $ 

(521) 
-
-
(115) 
(38) 

32,241 
35,412 
7,451 
1,755 
842 
36,827 

112,692  $ 

2,539 

. $. 

(703)  $ 

114,528 

125  $ 

125  $ 

125 

125 

June 30, 

2009 

Amortized 
Cost 

Gross 
Unrealized 
Gains 

Gross 
Unrealized 
Losses 

Estimated 
Market 
Value 

U.S.  Govemment and agency 
Municipal  obligations 
Corporate  obligations 
Mortgage-backed  securites - government-backed 
Private label CMOs 
CMOs - govemment backed 

$ 

3,893  $ 

14  $ 

(25)  $ 

29,747 
9,963 
8,287 
2,226 
29,048 

202 
149 
162 

-

663 

(1,056) 
(619) 
(5) 
(382) 
(4) 

3,882 
28,893 
9,493 
8,444 
1,844 
29,707 

Total securities available for sale 

83,164 $ 

1,190 $ 

(2,091) $ 

82,263 

Held to  Maturitv 

Municpal  obligations 

Total securities held to maturity 

Securities ASC  825 
Preferred  stock 

375  $ 

375  $ 

9  $ 

9  $ 

2,000 $ 

2,000 $ 

(1,975) $ 

$ 

(1,975) $ 

384 

384 

25 

25 

-16-

EAGLE  BANCORP  MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Notes to Consolidated Financial  Statements 
June 30, 2010 and 2009 

NOTE 3:  Securities -  continued 

Beginning  July  1, 2007  the  Company  elected  to  account  for  hs  FHLMC  and  FNMA  preferred 
stock under FASB  ASC  825, Fair  Value Option for  Financial Assets  and Financial Liabilities, 
which  allows  an  entity  the  irrevocable  option  to  elect  fair  value  for  the  initial  and  subsequent 
measurement  for  certain  financial  assets  and  liabilities  on  a  contract-by-contract  basis. 
Subsequent  changes  in  fair  value  of  these  assets  are  recognized  in  eamings  when  incurred. 
Management  elected  to  invoke  the  option  to  carry  its  preferred  stock  at  fair  value  to  more 
accurately  reflect  the  estimated  realizability  of  the  preferred  stock  at  each  financial  reporting 
date.  The  market  value  of  preferred  stock  was  $0  and  $25,000  at  June  30,  2010  and  2009, 
respectively.  These  securities were  sold during  the  second  quarter  of fiscal year  2010  resulting 
in a loss on sale of $64,000 from  their then carrying value.  The  gain and (loss) in market  value 
of  $84,000  and  ($1,296,000)  for  the  years  ending  June  30,  2010  and  2009,  respectively,  is 
included in noninterest income. 

The Company has not entered  into any interest rate  swaps, options, or futures  contracts  relating 
to investment  securities. 

Gross  recognized  gains  on  securities  available-for-sale  were  $250,000  and  $113,000  for  the 
years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.  Gross realized losses on securities  available-
for-sale were $217,000, and $59,000 for the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. 

The  amortized  cost  and  estimated  fair  value  of  securities  at  June  30,  2010  by  contractual 
maturity  are  shown below.  Expected  maturities  will  differ  from  contractual  maturities  because 
borrowers  may  have  the  right  to  call  or prepay  obligations  with  or  without  call  or  prepayment 
penalties. 

June 30, 

2010 

Held to Maturity 

Available for  Sale 

Amortized 
Cost 

Estimated 
Market 
Value 

Amortized 
Cost 

Estimated 
Market 
Value 

$ 

125  $ 

125  $ 

6,270  $ 

31,695 
11,918 
24,260 

6,314 
32,518 
12,106 
24,166 

125 

125 

74,143 

75,104 

(Dollars in  Thousands) 

Due in one year or less 
Due from  one to five years 
Due from five to ten years 
Due after ten years 

Mortgage-backed  securites -
government-backed 
Private lable CMOs 
CMOs - govemment backed 

1,690 
957 
35,902 
112,692  $ 

1,755 
842 
36,827 
114,528 

Total 

$ 

125  $ 

125  $ 

Maturities of securities do not reflect repricing opportunities present in adjustable  rate securities. 

-17-

EAGLE  BANCORP MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Notes to Consolidated Financial  Statements 
June 30, 2010 and 2009 

NOTE 3:  Securities -  continued 

At  June  30,  2010  and  2009,  securities  with  a  carrying  value  of  $35,760,000  and  $36,651,000, 
respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits and for other purposes required or permitted 
by law. 

The  following  table  discloses,  as  of  June  30,  2010  and  2009,  the  Company's  investment 
securities  that  have  been  in  a  continuous  unrealized-loss  position  for  less  than  12 months  and 
those that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for  12 or more months: 

(Dollars in  Thousands) 

Less than  12 months 

12 months or longer 

June 30, 

2010 

Estimated 
Market 
Value 

Gross 
Unrealized 
Losses 

Estimated 
Market 
Value 

Gross 
Unrealized 
Losses 

U.S. Govemment and agency  $ 
Municipal  obligations 
Private label CMOs 
Mortgage-backed  & CMOs 

$ 

3,679 
5,712 
467 
6,729 

27  $ 
129 
14 
38 

$ 

872 
3,884 
374 

-

2 
392 
101 

-

Total 

$ 

16,587 

.$_ 

208  $ 

5,130 

$_ 

495 

June 30, 

2009 

U.S. Govemment and agency  $ 
Municipal  obligations 
Corporate  obligations 
Private label CMOs 
Mortgage-backed  & CMOs 

1,686 
11,529 
1,193 
1,339 
1,416 

$ 

18  $ 

422 
49 
192 
4 

$ 

458 
5,732 
1,961 
504 
558 

• 

-

7 
634 
570 
190 
5 

Total 

$ 

17,163 

_$_ 

685  $ 

9,213 

_$_ 

1,406 

The  table  above  shows  the  Company's  investment  gross  unrealized  losses  and  fair  values, 
aggregated  by investment  category  and length of time that the individual  securities have been in 
a  continuous unrealized  loss position  at June  30, 2010  and 2009.  48 and 97  securities  are in an 
unrealized  loss position as of June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. 

Management  evaluates  securities  for  other-than-temporary  impairment  at  least  on  a  quarterly 
basis,  and  more  frequently  when  economic  or  market  concems  warrant  such  evaluation. 
Consideration  is given  to  (1)  the  length  of time  and the  extent  to which  the  fair  value  has  been 
less than cost, (2) the financial  condition and near-term prospects  ofthe  issuer, and (3) the intent 
and  ability  of  the  Bank  to  retain  its  investment  in  the  issuer  for  a period  of  time  sufficient  to 
allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. 

-18-

EAGLE  BANCORP  MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Notes to Consolidated Financial  Statements 
June 30, 2010 and 2009 

NOTE 3:  Securities -  continued 

At  June  30,  2010,  41  U.S.  Govemment  and  agency  securities  and  municipal  obligations  have 
unrealized  losses with aggregate  depreciation  of less than  0.82% from  the Company's  amortized 
cost  basis.  These  unrealized  losses  are  principally  due  to  changes  in  interest  rates  and  credit 
spreads. 
In  analyzing  an  issuer's  financial  condition,  management  considers  whether  the 
securities  are  issued  by  the  federal  govemment  or  its  agencies,  whether  downgrades  by  bond 
rating  agencies have occurred,  and industry  analysts' reports.  As management  has the ability to 
hold debt securities until maturity, or for the foreseeable  future  if classified  as available for sale, 
no declines are deemed to be other than temporary. 

At June 30, 2010, 7 mortgage backed and CMO securities have unrealized losses with  aggregate 
depreciation  of  less  than  0.4%  from  the  Company's  cost  basis.  We  believe  these  unrealized 
losses are principally  due to the credit market's  concems regarding the  stability  ofthe  mortgage 
market.  Management  considers  available  evidence  to  assess  whether  it  is  more  likely-than-not 
that  all  amounts  due  would  not  be  collected.  In  such  assessment,  management  considers  the 
severity  and  duration  of  the  impairment,  the  credit  ratings  of  the  security,  the  overall  deal  and 
payment  stracture,  including  the  Company's  position  within  the  stracture,  underlying  obligor, 
financial condition  and near term prospects  of the issuer,  delinquencies, defaults,  loss  severities, 
recoveries,  prepayments,  cumulative  loss  projections,  discounted  cash  flows  and  fair  value 
estimates.  There  has  been  no  disraption  of  the  scheduled  cash  flows  on  any  of  the  securities. 
Management's  analysis  as of June 30, 2010 revealed no expected  credit losses  on the securities. 
Two  of  the  CMO  securities  are non-agency  securities  (backed  by  Alt-A  collateral)  which  have 
ratings  below  investment  grade  from  the  credit  rating  agencies.  The  fair  value  of  these  two 
securities represents  less than 0.65% ofthe  total fair value of all securities  available for  sale and 
their unrealized loss is $108,000 as of June 30, 2010. 

-19-

EAGLE  BANCORP MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Notes to Consolidated Financial  Statements 
June 30, 2010 and 2009 

NOTE 4:  Loans 

A summary ofthe  balances of loans  follows: 

(Dollars in  Thousands) 
First mortgage loans: 

Residential mortgage (1-4 family) 
Commercial real estate 
Real estate  constraction 
Other loans: 
Home equity 
Consumer 
Commercial 
Subtotal 

Less: Allowance for loan losses 
Deferred  loan fees, net 

June 30, 

2010 

2009 

$ 

73,010  $ 
41,677 
7,016 

79,216 
36,713 
4,642 

29,795 
9,613 
9,452 
170,563 

(1,100) 
39 

28,676 
10,835 
7,541 
167,623 

(525) 
99 

Total loans, net 

$ 

169,502  $ 

167,197 

Loans  net  of  related  allowance  for  loan  losses  on  which  the  accraal  of  interest  has  been 
discontinued  were  $2,402,000  and  $990,000  at  June  30,  2010  and  2009, respectively.  Interest 
income not  accraed  on these  loans and cash  interest  income was  immaterial  for  the years  ended 
June 30, 2010  and 2009. The allowance  for  loan  losses  on nonaccraal  loans as of June  30, 2010 
and 2009 was $380,000 and $12,000, respectively.  The Company  expects to collect  all amounts 
due on nonaccraal  loans, including  interest  accraed  at contractual  rates.  There were  $2,104,000 
($1,688,000  net  of  loss  reserves  of  $416,000)  of  and  $15,000  ($3,000  net  of  loss  reserves  of 
$12,000)  loans  considered  impaired  at  June  30,  2010  and  2009,  respectively.  As  of  June  30, 
2010 and 2009, the Company had $29,000 and  $251,000, respectively,  of loans past due  greater 
than ninety days that were still accraing  interest. 

The following  is a summary of changes in the allowance for loan losses: 

June 30, 

2010 

2009 

525  $ 
715 
(143) 
3 

300 
257 
(47) 
15 

1,100  $ 

525 

(Dollars in  Thousands) 
Balance at beginning of period 

Provision (credit) for loan losses 
Loans charged  off 
Recoveries of loans previously charged  off 

Balance at end of period 

-20-

EAGLE  BANCORP  MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Notes to Consolidated Financial  Statements 
June 30, 2010 and 2009 

NOTE 4:  Loans -  continued 

Loans  are  granted  to  directors  and  officers  of  the  Company  in the  ordinary  course  of business. 
Such loans are made in accordance with policies established for all loans ofthe  Company, except 
that  directors,  officers,  and  employees  may  be  eligible  to receive  discounts  on  loan  origination 
costs. 

Loans receivable  from  directors  and  senior  officers,  and their related parties, of the Company  at 
June  30, 2010  and 2009, were  $1,865,000  and  $1,761,000, respectively.  During the year  ended 
June  30,  2010,  total  principal  additions  amounted  to  $284,000  and  total  principal  payments 
amounted to $176,000.  Interest  income from all these loans was $117,000 and $140,000 for  the 
years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.  The Bank  serviced,  for the benefit  of others, 
$6,633,000  and  $6,832,000  at  June  30,  2010  and  2009, respectively,  loans  from  directors  and 
senior  officers. 

NOTE  5:  Mortgage  Servicing  Rights 

The  Company  is  servicing  loans  for  the  benefit  of  others  totaling  approximately  $297,423,000 
and  $270,508,000  at June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.  Servicing loans for  others  generally 
consists  of collecting mortgage payments, maintaining  escrow  accounts, disbursing payments  to 
investors, and foreclosure  processing. 

Custodial  escrow  balances  maintained  in  connection  with  the  foregoing  loan  servicing,  and 
included  in demand  deposits, were  approximately  $2,260,000  and  $2,668,000  at June  30, 2010 
and 2009, respectively. 

The following  is a summary of activity in mortgage servicing rights and the valuation allowance: 

Years Ended June 30, 

2010 

2009 

2,208 $ 
616 
(487) 
2,337 

1,652 
1,154 
(598) 
2,208 

(Dollars in  Thousands) 
Mortgage servicing rights 

Balance at beginning of period 
Mortgage servicing rights  capitalized 
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights 
Balance at end of period 

Valuation  allowance 

Balance at beginning of period 
Provision (credited) to operations 
Balance at end of period 

Net mortgage servicing rights 

2,337  $ 

2,208 

-21-

EAGLE  BANCORP MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Notes to Consolidated Financial  Statements 
June 30, 2010 and 2009 

NOTE  S:  Mortgage  Servicing Rights -  continued 

The  fair  values  of  these  rights  were  $2,400,000  and  $2,389,000  at June  30, 2010  and  June  30, 
2009,  respectively.  The  fair  value  of  servicing  rights  was  determined  using  discount  rates 
ranging  from  9.0%  to  20.0%., prepayment  speeds  ranging  from  213%) to  405%,  depending  on 
stratification  ofthe  specific  right.  The fair value was also adjusted  for the affect  of potential past 
dues and  foreclosures. 

NOTE  6:  Premises  and  Equipment 

A summary ofthe  cost and accumulated depreciation of premises and equipment  follows: 

(Dollars in  Thousands) 
Land, buildings, and improvements 
Fumiture and equipment 

Accumulated  depreciation 

June 30, 

2010 

2009 

$ 

— 

18,504  $ 
4,369 
22,873 
(7,025) 

16,380 
3,757 
20,137 
(6,376) 

$_ 

15,848  $ 

13,761 

Depreciation  expense  totaled  $586,000  and  $482,000  for  the  years  ended  June  30,  2010  and 
2009, respectively. 

NOTE  7:  Deposits 

The composition of deposits is summarized as follows: 

(Dollars in  Thousands) 
Noninterest  checking 
Interest bearing checking (0.15%,  0.33%) 
Passbook savings (0.21%,  0.41%) 
Money market accounts (.24%,  .64%) 
Time certificates  of deposits 

June 30, 

2010 

2009 

18,376  $ 
34,658 
30,875 
29,021 

15,002 
32,664 
26,445 
26,886 

(2010 - .50% - 4.64%, 2009 - .75% - 5.35%) 

85,009 

86,202 

197,939  $ 

187,199 

The  weighted  average  cost  of  deposit  fiinds  was  .85% and  1.38%  at  June  30,  2010  and  2009, 
respectively. 

-22-

EAGLE  BANCORP  MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Notes to Consolidated Financial  Statements 
June 30, 2010 and 2009 

NOTE  7:  Deposits -  continued 

At June 30, 2010, the scheduled maturities of time deposits are as follows: 

(Dollars in  Thousands) 
Within one year 
One to two years 
Two to three years 
Three to four years 
Thereafter 

Total 

Interest expense on deposits is summarized as follows: 

(Dollars in  Thousands) 
Checking 
Passbook  savings 
Money market accounts 
Time certificates  of deposits 

$ 

61,005 
15,876 
4,547 
2,850 
731 

$_ 

85,009 

Years Ended June 30, 

2010 

2009 

72  $ 
92 
117 
1,880 

114 
131 
322 
2,594 

2,161  $ 

3,161 

As  of  May  20,  2009  FDIC  insurance  covers  deposits  up  to  $250,000  through  December  31, 
2013.  On July 21, 2010, this coverage was made permanent with the passage ofthe  Frank-Dodd 
Wall  Street  Reform  and  Consumer  Protection  Act.  At  June  30,  2010  the  Company  held 
$17,787,000  in  deposit  accounts  that  included  balances  of  $250,000  or  more.  The  Bank  is  a 
participant  in  the  FDIC's  Transactional  Account  Gaurantee  Program,  and  as  such  noninterest 
bearing accounts are fiilly  insured until December  31, 2010 when the program expires.  At June 
30, 2010 the Company held $18,376,000, in noninterest bearing accounts. 

At  June  30,  2010  and  2009,  the  Company  reclassified  $53,000  and  $148,000,  respectively,  in 
overdrawn deposits as loans. 

Directors'  and  senior  officers'  deposit  accounts  at June  30, 2010  and  2009, were  $235,000  and 
$299,000, respectively. 

-23-

EAGLE  BANCORP MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Notes to Consolidated Financial  Statements 
June 30, 2010 and 2009 

NOTE  8:  Advances from  the Federal Home Loan  Bank  and  other  borrowings 

Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattie and other borrowings mature as follows: 

(Dollars in  Thousands) 
Within one year 
One to two years 
Two to three years 
Three to four years 
Four to five years 
Thereafter 

Total 

Federal Home Loan Advances 

June 30, 

2010 

2009 

13,224  $ 
18,000 
16,000 
9,000 
9,000 
2,000 

10,667 
8,389 
18,000 
16,000 
9,000 
5,000 

67,224  $ 

67,056 

The advances are due at maturity, with the exception oftwo  advances, totaling, $10,000,000, that 
are callable  at the FHLB  of  Seattle's  option.  The advances  are subject  to prepayment penalties. 
The  interest  rates  on  advances  are  fixed.  The  advances  are  collateralized  by  investment 
securities  pledged  to  the  FHLB  of  Seattle  and  a  blanket  pledge  of  the  Bank's  1-4  family 
residential  mortgage  portfolio.  The  carrying  value  of  the  securities  collateralized  for  these 
advances  was  $1,135,081  as  of  June  30,  2009.  At  June  30,  2010  and  2009,  the  Company 
exceeded the collateral requirements ofthe  FHLB.  The Company's  investment in FHLB stock is 
also  pledged  as  collateral  on  these  advances.  The  total  FHLB  funding  line  available  to  the 
Company at June 30, 2010, was 30% oftotal  Bank assets, or approximately  $93.17 million.  The 
balance of advances was $44,224,000 and $44,056,000 at June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. 

Other Borrowings 

The  Bank  had  $23,000,000  in  stractured  repurchase  agreements  with  PNC  Financial  Service 
Group,  Inc.  ("PNC")  at  June  30,  2010,  and  2009.  These  agreements  are  collateralized  by 
corporate and municipal securities.  The carrying value of these securities was $28,515,000 as of 
June  30, 2010.  These  agreements  include  terms, under  certain  conditions, which  allow  PNC  to 
exercise a call option. 

Federal Funds Purchased 

The  Bank  has  a  $7,000,000  Federal  Funds  line  of  credit  with  PNC.  The balance  was  $0  as  of 
June 30, 2010 and 2009. 

The Bank has a $6,500,000  Federal Funds  line of credit with Zions Bank.  The balance was $0 
as of June 30, 2010 and 2009. 

-24-

EAGLE  BANCORP MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Notes to Consolidated Financial  Statements 
June 30, 2010 and 2009 

NOTE  8:  Advances from  the Federal Home Loan Bank and other borrowings -  continued 

Federal Reserve Bank Discount  Window 

For  additional  liquidity  sources,  the  Bank  has  a  credit  facility  at  the  Federal  Reserve  Bank's 
Discount  Window.  The  amount  available  to  the  Bank  is  limited  by  various  collateral 
requirements.  The  Bank  has  pledged  one  Agency  security  and  one  collateralized  mortgage 
obligation  security  at the Federal  Reserve  Bank  that had  a total  carrying value of $5,547,000  as 
of June 30, 2010.  The account had $0 balance as of June 30, 2010 and 2009. 

For all borrowings  outstanding  the weighted  average  interest  rate for  advances  at June  30, 2010 
and  2009  was  3.78%)  and  4.02%  respectively.  The  weighted  average  amount  outstanding  was 
$66,090,000 and $67,772,000 for the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. 

The maximum  amount  outstanding  at  any month-end  was  $68,500,000  and  $73,789,000  during 
the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. 

NOTE  9:  Subordinated  Debentures 

On  September  28,  2005,  the  Company  completed  the  private  placement  of  $5,155,000  in 
subordinated  debentures to Eagle Bancorp  Statutory  Trast  I ("the  Trasf).  The Trast  funded  the 
purchase  of  the  subordinated  debentures  through  the  sale  of  trast  preferred  securities  to  First 
Tennessee Bank, N.A. with a liquidation value of $5,155,000.  Using interest payments made by 
the Company  on the debentures, the Trast began paying quarterly dividends to preferred  security 
holders  on  December  15,  2005.  The  annual  percentage  rate  of  the  interest  payable  on  the 
subordinated  debentures  and  distributions  payable  on the preferred  securities  is  fixed  at  6.02% 
until December  15, 2010  then becomes  variable  at 3-Month  LIBOR plus  1.42%).  Dividends  on 
the preferred  securities are cumulative and the Trast may defer the payments for up to five years. 
The  preferred  securities  mature  in  December  15, 2035  unless  the  Company  elects  and  obtains 
regulatory approval to accelerate the maturity date to as early as December  15, 2010. 

For  the  years  ended  June  30,  2010  and  June  30,  2009,  interest  expense  on  the  subordinated 
debentures was $309,000. 

Subordinated  debt  may  be  included  in regulatory  Tier  1 capital  subject  to  a limitation  that  such 
amounts  not  exceed  25% of  Tier  1 capital.  The  remainder  of  subordinated  debt  is  included  in 
Tier II capital. There is no limitation for inclusion of subordinated debt in total risk-based  capital 
and, as such, all subordinated debt was included in total risk-based capital. 

NOTE  10:  Legal  Contingencies 

Various  legal claims  also arise from time to time in the normal  course of business  which,  in the 
opinion of management, will have no material effect  on the Company's  financial  statements. 

-25-

EAGLE  BANCORP  MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Notes to Consolidated Financial  Statements 
June 30, 2010 and 2009 

NOTE  11:  Income  Taxes 

The components ofthe  Company's income tax provision are as follows: 

(Dollars in  Thousands) 
Current 

U.S.  federal 
Montana 

Deferred 

U.S.  federal 
Montana 

Total 

Years Ended June 30, 

2010 

2009 

(894) $ 
(247) 
(1,141) 

975 
270 
1,245 

1,697 
479 
2,176 

(149) 
(72) 
(221) 

1,035  $ 

1,024 

The nature and components of deferred  tax assets and liabilities, which are a component of other 
liabilities in 2010 and other assets in 2009 in the accompanying  statement of financial condition, 
are as follows: 

June 30, 

2010 

2009 

(Dollars in  Thousands) 
Deferred  tax assets: 

Deferred  compensation 
Loans receivable 
Deferred  loan  fees 
Securities available-for-sale  & preferred  stock FASB ASC 825 
Other 

$ 

Total deferred  tax assets 

Deferred  tax liabilities: 

Premises and equipment 
Deferred  loan fees 
FHLB stock 
Securities available-for-sale  & preferred  stock FASB ASC 825 
Unrealized gain on hedging 
Other 

Total deferred  tax liabilities 

278  $ 
130 
13 

-

17 
438 

1,017 
-
389 
551 
102 

2,059 

Net deferred  tax (liability) asset 

$ 

(1,621)  $ 

272 
34 

-
862 
16 
1,184 

210 
11 
389 

20 

630 

554 

The  Company  believes,  based  upon  the  available  evidence,  that  all  deferred  tax  assets  will  be 
realized in the normal  course of operations.  Accordingly, these assets have not been reduced by 
a valuation allowance. 

-26-

EAGLE  BANCORP  MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Notes to Consolidated Financial  Statements 
June 30, 2010 and 2009 

NOTE  11:  Income  Taxes -  continued 

A reconciliation  ofthe  Company's  effective  income tax provision to the statutory federal  income 
tax rate is as follows: 

(Dollars in  Thousands) 

Federal income taxes at the statutory rate of 34% 
State income taxes 
Nontaxable income 
Other, net 

Income tax expense 

Effective  tax rate 

Years Ended June 30, 

2010 

2009 

$ 

1,173$ 
233 
(541) 
170 

1,160 
230 
(451) 
85_ 

$ 

1,035  $ 

1,024 

30.0% 

30.0% 

Prior  to  January  1,  1987,  the  Company  was  allowed  a  special  bad  debt  deduction  limited 
generally  in  the  current  year  to  32%o (net  of  preference  tax)  of  otherwise  taxable  income  and 
subject to certain limitations based on aggregate loans and savings account balances at the end of 
the  year.  If  the  amounts  that  qualified  as  deductions  for  federal  income  tax  purposes  are  later 
used for purposes other than for bad debt losses, they will be subject to federal  income tax at the 
then current  corporate rate.  Retained  eamings  include approximately  $852,000  and $525,000 at 
June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, for which federal  income tax has not been provided. 

-27-

EAGLE  BANCORP  MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Notes to Consolidated Financial  Statements 
June 30, 2010 and 2009 

NOTE  12:  Comprehensive  Income 

Comprehensive  income  represents  the  sum  of  net  income  and  items  of  "other  comprehensive 
income" that  are reported  directly  in  stockholders'  equity,  such  as the  change  during the  period 
in the after-tax  net unrealized  gain or loss on securities  available-for-sale. 

The Company's  other comprehensive  income is summarized  as follows  for the years ended June 
30: 

2010 

2009 

(Dollars in  Thousands) 
Net unrealized holding loss arising during the year: 

Available for  sale securities, net of related income 
tax (expense) benefit  of($831)  and $112, respectively 

$ 

1,938  $ 

263 

Forward delivery commitments, net of related 
income tax expense of $82 and $6, respectively 

191 

15 

Reclassification  adjustment  for net realized gain 
included in net income, net of related income 
tax expense of $9 and $16, respectively 

(23) 

(38) 

Other comprehensive  income 

$ 

2,106  $ 

240 

-28-

EAGLE  BANCORP  MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Notes to Consolidated Financial  Statements 
June 30, 2010 and 2009 

NOTE  13:  Supplemental  Cash Flow  Information 

Years Ended June 30, 

2010 

2009 

(Dollars in  Thousands) 
Supplemental Cash Flow  Information 

Cash paid during the year for  interest 
Cash paid during the year for income taxes 

5,115 $ 
603 

6,127 
1,475 

Non-Cash Investing Activities 

Increase in market 

value of securities available for  sale 
Mortgage servicing rights capitalized 
ESOP shares released 

NOTE  14:  Regulatory  Capital  Requirements 

(2,737) $ 
617 
101 

(321) 
1,154 
114 

The Bank  is  subject  to various  regulatory  capital  requirements  administered  by  federal  banking 
agencies.  Failure  to  meet  minimum  capital  requirements  can  initiate  certain  mandatory  -  and 
possibly  additional  discretionary  -  actions by  regulators  that,  if undertaken,  could have  a direct 
material  effect  on  the  Bank's  financial  statements.  Under  capital  adequacy  guidelines  and  the 
regulatory  framework  for  prompt  corrective  action,  the  Bank  must  meet  specific  capital 
guidelines  that  involve  quantitative  measures  of  the  Bank's  assets,  liabilities,  and  certain  off-
balance-sheet  items  as  calculated  under  regulatory  accounting  practices.  The  Bank's  capital 
amounts  and  classifications  are  also  subject  to  qualitative  judgments  by  the  regulators  about 
components, risk weightings, and other  factors. 

Quantitative  measures  established  by  regulation  to ensure  capital  adequacy  require  the  Bank  to 
maintain minimum  amounts and ratios  (set forth  in the table below)  of tangible  and core  capital 
(as defined  in the regulations)  to total  adjusted  assets  (as  defined),  and  of  risk-based  capital  (as 
defined)  to  risk-weighted  assets  (as  defined).  Management  believes,  as  of  June  30,  2010  and 
2009, that the Bank meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is  subject. 

The  most  recent  notification  from  the  Office  of  Thrift  Supervision  ("OTS")  (as  of  January  5, 
2009)  categorized  the  Bank  as  well  capitalized  under  the  regulatory  framework  for  prompt 
corrective  action.  To  be  categorized  as  well-capitalized,  the  Bank  must  maintain  minimum 
tangible,  core,  and  risk-based  ratios  as  set  forth  in  the  table  below.  The  Bank's  actual  capital 
amounts (in thousands) and ratios are presented in the table below: 

-29-

EAGLE  BANCORP  MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Notes to Consolidated Financial  Statements 
June 30, 2010 and 2009 

NOTE  14:  Regulatory  Capital Requirements -  continued 

(Dollars in  Thousands) 

Actual 

Minimum 
Capital 
Requirement 

Minimum 
To Be Well 
Capitalized Under 
Prompt  Cortective 
Action Provisions 

June  30, 2010: 

Amount 

Ratio 

Amount 

Ratio 

Amount 

Ratio 

Total Risk-based  Capital 
to Risk "Weighted Assets 
Consolidated 
Bank 

Tier 1 Capital to 
Risk Weighted Assets 
Consolidated 
Bank 

Tier I Capital to 
Adjusted  Total Assets 
Consolidated 
Bank 

Tangible Capital to 
Adjusted  Total Assets 
Consolidated 
Bank 

June 30,2009: 

Total Risk-based  Capital 
to Risk Weighted Assets 

Consolidated 
Bank 

Tier 1 Capital to 

Risk Weighted Assets 
Consolidated 
Bank 

Tier I Capital to 
Adjusted  Total Assets 
Consolidated 
Bank 

Tangible Capital to 

Adjusted  Total Assets 

Consolidated 

Bank 

$  56,591 
41,223 

26.47  % 
19.63 

$  17,103 
16,799 

8.00%  $ 
8.00 

N/A 
20,999 

N/A  % 
10.00 

55,908 
40,539 

26.15 
19.31 

8,551 
8,400 

4.00 
4.00 

N/A 
12,599 

N/A 
6.00 

55,908 
40,539 

17.12 
13.10 

9,798 
9,282 

3.00 
3.00 

N/A 
15,471 

N/A 
5.00 

55,908 
40,539 

17.12 
13.10 

4,899 
4,641 

1.50 
1.50 

N/A 
N/A 

N/A 
N/A 

$  33,886 
27,592 

16.61  % 
13.66 

$  16,318 
16,157 

8.00%  $ 
8.00 

N/A 
20,196 

N/A  % 
10.00 

33,374 
27,079 

16.36 
13.41 

8,159 
8,078 

4.00 
4.00 

N/A 
12,118 

N/A 
6.00 

33,374 
27,079 

11.50 
9.53 

8,709 
8,522 

3.00 
3.00 

N/A 
14,203 

N/A 
5.00 

33,374 

27,079 

11.50 

9.53 

4,354 

4,261 

1.50 

1.50 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

-30-

EAGLE  BANCORP MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Notes to Consolidated Financial  Statements 
June 30, 2010 and 2009 

NOTE  14:  Regulatory  Capital Requirements -  continued 

A  reconciliation  of  the  Bank's  capital  (in  thousands)  determined  by  generally  accepted 
accounting principles to capital defined  for regulatory purposes, is as follows: 

(Dollars in  Thousands) 
Capital determined by generally 

accepted accounting principles 
Unrealized (gain) loss on securities  available-for-sale 
Unrealized gain on forward  delivery  commitments 
Tier I (core) capital 
General allowance for loan losses 

2010 

2009 

42,009  $ 
(1,232) 
(238) 
40,539 
684 

26,687 
439 
(47) 
27,079 
513 

Total risk based capital 

$ 

41,223  $ 

27,592 

Dividend Limitations 

Under  OTS  regulations  that  became  effective  April  1,  1999,  savings  associations  such  as  the 
Bank  generally  may  declare  annual  cash  dividends up to  an amount  equal to net  income  for  the 
current year plus net  income retained  for  the two preceding  years.  Dividends  in excess  of  such 
amount require OTS approval.  The Bank has paid dividends totaling $1,000,000 and  $1,552,000 
to  the  Company  during  the  years  ended  June  30, 2010,  and  2009, respectively.  The  Company 
had  paid  quarterly  dividends  of  $0.26  per  share  for  the  first  three  fiscal  quarters  of  fiscal  year 
ended June 30, 2010.  For its fourth  quarter fiscal  year ended June 30, 2010, the Company paid a 
dividend  of  $0.06842 per  share  ($0.26  on a converted  basis  with  regards  to the  conversion  that 
occurred  on April  5, 2010)  to  its  shareholders.  The  Company  paid  four  quarterly  dividends  of 
$.255 per share to its shareholders for the year ended June 30, 2009. 

Liquidation  Rights 

Eagle Bancorp  Montana,  Inc. holds  a liquidation  account  for  the benefit  of certain depositors  of 
American  Federal  Savings  Bank  who  remain  depositors  of the  Bank  at the  time  of  liquidation. 
The liquidation  account  is designed  to provide  payments  to these  depositors  of their  liquidation 
interests  in the event of a liquidation  of Eagle  and the Bank,  or the Bank  alone.  In the unlikely 
event  that  Eagle  and  the  Bank  were  to  liquidate  in the  future,  all  claims  of  creditors,  including 
those  of  depositors,  would  be paid  first,  followed  by  distribution  to  depositors  as  of  November 
30,  2008  (who  continue  to be  the  Bank's  depositors)  of  the  liquidation  account  maintained  by 
Eagle.  Also,  in  a  complete  liquidation  of  both  entities,  or  of just  the  Bank,  when  Eagle  has 
insufficient  assets to fund  the liquidation account distribution due to depositors and the Bank has 
positive  net  worth,  the  Bank  would  immediately  pay  amounts  necessary  to  fund  Eagle's 
remaining  obligations  under  the  liquidation  account.  If  Eagle  is  completely  liquidated  or  sold 
apart from a sale or liquidation  of the Bank, then the rights  of such depositors  in the  liquidation 
account  maintained  by  Eagle  would  be  surrendered  and  treated  as  a  liquidation  account  in  the 
Bank, the "bank liquidation accounf  and these depositors  shall have an equivalent interest in the 
bank liquidation account and the same rights and terms as the liquidation  account. 

-31-

EAGLE  BANCORP MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Notes to Consohdated Financial  Statements 
June 30, 2010 and 2009 

NOTE  14:  Regulatory  Capital Requirements -  continued 

Liquidation Rights -  continued 

After  two years from  the date of conversion  and upon the written request  ofthe  OTS, Eagle will 
eliminate or transfer  the liquidation account and the interests in such account to the Bank and the 
liquidation  account  would  become  the  liquidation  account  of  the  Bank  and  not  subject  in  any 
manner  or  amount  to  Eagle's  creditors.  Also,  under  the  rales  and  regulations  of  the  OTS,  no 
post-conversion  merger,  consolidation,  or  similar  combination  or  transaction  with  another 
depository  institution  in  which  Eagle  or  the  Bank  is  not  the  surviving  institution  would  be 
considered  a liquidation and, in such a transaction, the liquidation  account would be assumed by 
the surviving institution. 

NOTE  15:  Related  Party  Transactions 

The Bank has contracted with a subsidiary  of a company which is partially  owned by one of the 
Company's  directors.  The Bank paid  $103,000 during the year ended June 30, 2010 for  support 
services, and  an  additional  $157,000  for  computer hardware  and  software  used by  the Bank  for 
its computer network.  For the year ended June 30, 2009, expenditures were $54,000 for  support 
services and $83,000 for computer hardware and  software. 

In 2007, the  Bank  also made  a constraction  loan,  in the  normal  course  of lending,  to this  same 
affiliated  entity  for  the  constraction  of  an  office  building.  In  fiscal  2008  the  constraction  was 
completed  and the  loan  was refinanced  into  $7,500,000  permanent  financing.  On July  9, 2008, 
80 percent,  or $6.0 milhon was sold to the Montana Board  of Investments.  As of June 30, 2010 
this  loan's  principal  balance  was  $7,102,000  ($1,420,000  net  of  participation  sold).  The  Bank 
maintains the servicing for this loan and the loan is current. 

NOTE  16:  Employee  Benefits 

Profit Sharing Plan 

The  Company  provides  a noncontributory  profit  sharing  plan  for  eligible  employees  who  have 
completed  one year  of  service.  The  amount ofthe  Company's  annual contribution,  limited to a 
maximum  of  15% of  qualified  employees'  salaries,  is  determined  by  the  Board  of  Directors. 
Profit  sharing  expense was  $169,000 and  $182,000 for  the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, 
respectively. 

The Company's  profit  sharing plan  includes  a 401(k)  feature.  At the discretion  ofthe  Board  of 
Directors, the Company may match up to 50% of participants'  contributions up to a maximum of 
4% of participants'  salaries.  For the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company's  match 
totaled $48,000 and $47,000, respectively. 

-32-

EAGLE  BANCORP  MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Notes to Consolidated Financial  Statements 
June 30, 2010 and 2009 

NOTE  16:  Employee Benefits -  continued 

Deferred  Compensation Plans -  continued 

The  Company  has  entered  into  deferred  compensation  contracts  with  current  key  employees. 
The contracts  provide fixed benefits  payable  in equal annual  installments upon retirement.  The 
Company purchased  life  insurance  contracts that may be used to fund  the payments.  The  charge 
to  expense  is  based  on  the  present  value  computations  of  anticipated  liabilities.  For  the  years 
ended  June  30,  2010  and  2009,  the  total  expense  was  $106,000  and  $102,000,  respectively. 
The  Company  has  recorded  a  liability  for  the  deferred  compensation  plan  of  $926,000  and 
$908,000  at  June  30, 2010  and  2009, respectively,  which  is  included  in the balance  of  accraed 
expenses and other liabilities. 

Employee Stock Ownership Plan 

The Company has established  an ESOP for  eligible employees who meet certain age and  service 
requirements.  At  inception,  in April  2000, the  ESOP  borrowed  $368,000  from  Eagle  Bancorp 
and  used  the  funds  to  purchase  46,006  shares  of  common  stock,  at  $8  per  share,  in  the  initial 
offering.  This borrowing was fully  paid on December  31, 2009.  Again, in conjunction  with the 
subsequent  offering  in  April  2010,  the  ESOP  borrowed  $1,971,420  from  Eagle  Bancorp 
Montana, Inc. and used the funds  to purchase  197,142 shares ofcommon  stock, at $10 per share. 
The  Bank  makes  periodic  contributions  to  the  ESOP  sufficient  to  satisfy  the  debt  service 
requirements  of the  loan that has  a twelve-year  term  and bears  interest  at  8%.  The ESOP uses 
these  contributions,  and  any  dividends  received  by  the  ESOP  on  unallocated  shares,  to  make 
principal and interest payments on the loan. 

Shares purchased  by the ESOP  are held in a suspense  account by the plan trastee until  allocated 
to participant  accounts.  Shares released  from  the  suspense  account  are allocated  to  participants 
on the basis of their relative  compensation  in the year of allocation.  Participants become  vested 
in  the  allocated  shares  over  a  period  not  to  exceed  seven  years.  Any  forfeited  shares  are 
allocated to other participants in the same proportion as contributions. 

Total  ESOP  expenses  of  $123,000  and  $107,000  were  recognized  in  fiscal  2010  and  2009, 
respectively. 4600  shares were released  and allocated to participants  during the year  ended June 
30,  2009.  2,300  shares,  prior  to  the  April  5,  2010  conversion,  were  released  and  allocated  to 
participants during the year ended June 30, 2010.  8,214  shares, subsequent  to the conversion on 
April 5, 2010, were allocated to participants  during the year ended June 30, 2010.The cost  ofthe 
188,928  ESOP  shares  ($1,889,280  at  June  30,  2010)  that  have  not  yet  been  allocated  or 
committed to be released to participants is deducted from  stockholders'  equity.  The fair value of 
these shares was approximately  $1,842,048 at that date. 

Stock Incentive Plan 

The  Company  adopted  the  Stock  Incentive  Plan  ("the  Plan")  on  October  19, 2000.  The  Plan 
provides  for  different  types  of awards  including  stock options, restricted  stock and  perfonnance 
shares.  Under  the  Plan,  23,000  shares  of restricted  stock were  granted  to  directors  and  certain 
officers  during  fiscal  2001.  These  shares  of restricted  stock vest in equal  installments  over five 
years beginning one year from the grant date. 

There were no stock options granted under the Plan as of June 30, 2010. 

-33-

EAGLE  BANCORP  MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Notes to Consolidated Financial  Statements 
June 30, 2010 and 2009 

NOTE  17:  Financial Instruments  and  Off-Balance-Sheet  Activities 

All  financial  instraments  held  or  issued  by  the  Company  are  held  or  issued  for  purposes  other 
than  trading.  In  the  ordinary  course  of  business,  the  Company  enters  into  off-balance-sheet 
financial 
instraments  consisting  of  commitments  to  extend  credit  and  forward  delivery 
commitments for the sale of whole loans to the secondary market. 

Commitments  to  extend  credit  -  In  response  to  marketplace  demands,  the  Company  routinely 
makes  commitments  to  extend  credit  for  fixed  rate  and  variable  rate  loans  with  or without  rate 
lock  guarantees.  When  rate  lock  guarantees  are  made  to  customers,  the  Company  becomes 
subject  to market risk  for  changes  in interest  rates that occur between  the rate  lock date  and the 
date that a firm commitment to purchase the loan is made by a secondary market investor. 

Generally,  as  interest  rates  increase, the market  value  of the loan  commitment  goes  down.  The 
opposite effect  takes place when interest rates decline. 

Commitments  to  extend  credit  are  agreements  to  lend  to  a  customer  as  long  as  the  borrower 
satisfies  the  Company's  underwriting  standards  and  related  provisions  of  the  bonowing 
agreements.  Commitments  generally  have  fixed  expiration  dates  or  other  termination  clauses 
and  may  require  payment  of  a  fee.  The  Company  uses  the  same  credit  policies  in  making 
commitments to extend credit as it does for  on-balance-sheet  instraments.  Collateral is required 
for  substantially  all  loans,  and  normally  consists  of  real  property.  The  Company's  experience 
has  been  that  substantially  all  loan  commitments  are  completed  or terminated  by  the  bonower 
within 3 to  12 months. 

The  notional  amounts  of  the  Company's  commitments  to  extend  credit  at  fixed  and  variable 
interest  rates  were  approximately  $9,029,000  and  $12,440,000  at  June  30,  2010  and  2009, 
respectively.  Fixed  rate  commitments  are  extended  at rates  ranging  from  4.00%  to  8.00%  and 
4.50%  to  8.0%  at  June  30,  2010  and  2009,  respectively.  The  Company  has  lines  of  credit 
representing  credit  risk  of  approximately  $59,373,000  and  $52,288,000  at  June  30,  2010  and 
2009,  respectively,  of  which  approximately  $32,012,000  and  $26,838,000  had  been  drawn  at 
June  30, 2010  and  2009, respectively.  The  Company  has  credit  cards  issued  representing  credit 
risk of approximately  $727,000 and $675,000 at June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively,  of which 
approximately  $30,000  and  $21,000  had  been  drawn  at  June  30, 2010  and  2009,  respectively. 
The  Company  has  letters  of credits  issued  representing  credit risk  of  approximately  $2,432,000 
and $1,347,000 at June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. 

Forward  delivery  commitments  -  The  Company  uses  mandatory  sell  forward  delivery 
commitments to sell whole loans.  These commitments are also used as a hedge against exposure 
to  interest-rate  risks  resulting  from  rate  locked  loan  origination  commitments  on  certain 
mortgage  loans held-for-sale.  Gains  and losses  in the items hedged  are defened  and recognized 
in other comprehensive  income until the  commitments  are completed.  At the completion  of the 
commitments the gains and losses are recognized  in the Company's income  statement. 

As  of  June  30,  2010  and  2009,  the  Company  had  entered  into  commitments  to  deliver 
approximately  $7,437,000 and $5,344,000 respectively, in loans to various investors, all at fixed 
interest  rates  ranging  from  2.75% to  7.125%  and  4.25% to  5.63%, at June  30, 2010  and 2009, 
respectively.  The  Company  had  approximately  $340,000  and  $68,000  of  gains  defened  as  a 
result  of  the  forward  delivery  commitments  entered  into  as  of  June  30,  2010  and  2009, 
respectively.  The total  amount  of the  gain  is  expected  to be  taken  into  income  within  the  next 
twelve months. 

-34-

EAGLE  BANCORP  MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Notes to Consolidated Financial  Statements 
June 30, 2010 and 2009 

NOTE  17:  Financial Instruments  and Off-Balance-Sheet  Activities -  continued 

The  Company  did  not  have  any  gains  or  losses  reclassified  into  eamings  as  a  result  of  the 
ineffectiveness  of  its  hedging  activities.  The  Company  considers  its  hedging  activities  to  be 
highly  effective. 

The  Company  did  not  have  any  gains  or  losses  reclassified  into  eamings  as  a  result  of  the 
discontinuance  of  cash  flow  hedges  because  it  was  probable  that  the  original  forecasted 
transaction  would  not  occur  by  the  end  of  the  originally  specified  time  frame  as  of  June  30, 
2010. 

The  Company  has no  other  off-balance-sheet  anangements  or transactions  with  unconsolidated, 
special  purpose  entities  that  would  expose  the  Company  to  liability  that  is  not  reflected  on  the 
face  ofthe  financial  statements. 

NOTE  18:  Fair Value  Disclosures 

FASB ASC  820 defines  fair  value as the price that would be received  to sell an asset  or paid to 
transfer  a  liability  in  an  orderly  transaction  between  market  participants.  A  fair  value 
measurement  assumes  that  the  transaction  to  sell  the  asset  or transfer  the  liability  occurs  in  the 
principal  market  for  the  asset  or  liability  or,  in  the  absence  of  a  principal  market,  the  most 
advantageous  market  for  the  asset  or liability.  The price  in the principal  (or most  advantageous) 
market used to measure the fair value ofthe  asset or liability  shall not be adjusted  for  transaction 
costs.  An  orderly  transaction  is  a transaction  that  assumes  exposure  to  the  market  for  a  period 
prior to the measurement  date to allow  for  marketing  activities  that  are usual  and customary  for 
transactions  involving  such  assets  and  liabilities;  it  is  not  a  forced  transaction.  Market 
participants  are  buyers  and  sellers  in  the  principal  market  that  are  (i) independent,  (ii) 
knowledgeable, (iii) able to transact and (iv) willing to transact. 

FASB  ASC  820  requires  the  use  of  valuation  techniques  that  are  consistent  with  the  market 
approach,  the  income  approach  and/or  the  cost  approach.  The  market  approach  uses  prices  and 
other  relevant  information  generated  by  market  transactions  involving  identical  or  comparable 
assets and liabilities. The  income  approach uses valuation  techniques to convert  ftiture  amounts, 
such  as  cash  flows  or  eamings,  to  a  single  present  amount  on  a  discounted  basis.  The  cost 
approach  is based on the amount that cunentiy  would be required to replace the service  capacity 
of  an  asset  (replacement  costs).  Valuation  techniques  should  be  consistently  applied.  Inputs  to 
valuation  techniques  refer  to  the  assumptions  that  market  participants  would  use  in pricing  the 
asset  or  liability.  Inputs  may  be  observable,  meaning  those  that  reflect  the  assumptions  market 
participants  would use  in pricing  the  asset  or liability  developed based  on market  data  obtained 
from  independent  sources, or unobservable, meaning those that reflect  the reporting entity's own 
assumptions  about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability 
developed  based  on  the  best  information  available  in  the  circumstances.  In  that  regard,  FASB 
ASC  820  establishes  a fair  value hierarchy  for  valuation  inputs that gives the highest priority  to 
quoted  prices  in  active  markets  for  identical  assets  or  liabilities  and  the  lowest  priority  to 
unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is as follows: 

-35-

EAGLE  BANCORP  MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Notes to Consolidated Financial  Statements 
June 30, 2010 and 2009 

NOTE  18:  Fair  Value Disclosures -  continued 

•  Level  1 Inputs  - Unadjusted  quoted prices  in active markets  for  identical  assets or  liabilities 

that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. 

«  Level  2 Inputs  - Inputs  other than  quoted prices  included  in Level  1 that  are observable  for 
the  asset  or  liability,  either  directly  or  indirectly.  These  include  quoted  prices  for  similar 
assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities 
in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset 
or liability  (for  example, interest rates, volatilities, prepayment  speeds, loss severities, credit 
risks  and  default  rates)  or  inputs  that  are  derived  principally  from  or  conoborated  by 
observable market data by conelation or other means. 

•  Level 3 Inputs - Significant  unobservable inputs that reflect  an entity's own assumptions that 

market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities. 

A  description  of  the  valuation  methodologies  used  for  assets  and  liabilities  measured  at  fair 
value,  as  well  as  the  general  classification  of  such  instniments  pursuant  to  the  valuation 
hierarchy, is set forth below. 

In general, fair value is based upon quoted market prices, where available. If such quoted market 
prices are not available,  fair  value is based upon  intemally developed models that primarily use, 
as  inputs,  observable  market-based  parameters.  Valuation  adjustments  may  be  made  to  ensure 
that financial  instraments  are recorded  at fair value. While management believes the  Company's 
valuation methodologies  are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of 
different  methodologies  or  assumptions  to  determine  the  fair  value  of  certain  financial 
instraments could result in a different  estimate of fair value at the reporting date. 

Available for  Sale Securities -  Securities classified  as available for  sale are reported at fair  value 
utilizing  Level  1  and  Level  2  inputs.  For  these  securities,  the  Company  obtains  fair  value 
measurements  from  an  independent  pricing  service.  The  fair  value  measurements  consider 
observable  data that  may  include  dealer  quotes, market  spreads, cash flows, the U.  S.  Treasury 
yield  curve,  live  trading  levels,  trade  execution  data,  market  consensus  prepayments  speeds, 
credit information  and the bond's terms and conditions, among other things. 

Impaired Loans  ~  Impaired  loans  are  reported  at  the  fair  value  of  the  underlying  collateral  if 
repayment  is  expected  solely  from  the  collateral.  Collateral  values  are  estimated  using  Level  3 
inputs based on intemally customized discounting  criteria. 

Preferred Stock -  FASB ASC 825- Freddie Mac  and Fannie Mae prefened  stock  are reported  at 
fair  value  utilizing  Level  1 and  Level  2inputs.  For  these  securities,  the  Company  obtains  fair 
value measurements  from  an independent pricing service.  The fair value measurements  consider 
observable  data that  may  include  dealer  quotes, market  spreads,  cash  flows,  the U.  S.  Treasury 
yield  curve,  live  trading  levels,  trade  execution  data,  market  consensus  prepayments  speeds, 
credit information  and the bond's terms and conditions, among other things. 

Loans Held for  Sale -  These  loans  are  reported  at the  lower  of  cost  or fair  value. Fair  value  is 
determined  based  on  expected  proceeds  based  on  sales  contracts  and  commitments  and  are 
considered Level 2 inputs. 

-36-

EAGLE  BANCORP  MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Notes to Consolidated Financial  Statements 
June 30, 2010 and 2009 

NOTE  18:  Fair  Value Disclosures -  continued 

Repossessed Assets -  Fair values are valued  at the time the loan is foreclosed  upon and the asset 
is transfened  from  loans.  The value  is based  upon  primary  third party  appraisals,  less  costs to 
sell.  The  appraisals  are  generally  discounted  based  on  management's  historical  knowledge, 
changes  in  market  conditions  from  the  time  of  valuation,  and/or  management's  expertise  and 
knowledge ofthe  client and client's business.  Such discounts  are typically significant  and result 
in  Level  3  classification  of  the  inputs  for  determining  fair  value.  Repossessed  assets  are 
reviewed  and  evaluated  on  at  least  a  quarterly  basis  for  additional  impairment  and  adjusted 
accordingly, based on same or similar factors  above. 

The  following  table  summarizes  financial  assets  and  financial  liabilities  measured  at  fair  value 
on a recumng basis as of June 30, 2010 and 2009, segregated by the level ofthe  valuation  inputs 
within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value (dollars in thousands): 

Available for sale securities 
Loans  held-for-sale 

$ 

$" 

-

Level 1 
Inputs 

June 30, 2010 

Level 2 
Inputs 
114,528  $ 
7,695 

Level 3 
Inputs 

Total Fair 
Value 
114,528 
7,695 

' $' 

Available for sale securities 
Prefened  stock - FASB ASC 825 
Loans  held-for-sale 

$~ 

June 30, 2009 

Level 1 
Inputs 

~ $~ 

-

Level 2 
Inputs 
82,263  $ 
25 
5,349 

Level 3 
Inputs 

" $" 

Total Fair 
Value 
82,263 
25 
5,349 

Certain  financial  assets  and  financial  liabilities  are  measured  at  fair  value  on  a  nonrecurring 
basis; that  is, the  instraments  are not measured  at fair  value  on an ongoing basis but are  subject 
to  fair  value  adjustments  in  certain  circumstances  (for  example,  when  there  is  evidence  of 
impainnent).  The following  table  summarizes  financial  assets and financial liabilities  measured 
at fair value on a nomecuning basis as of June 30, 2010 and 2009, segregated by the level  ofthe 
valuation  inputs  within  the  fair  value  hierarchy  utilized  to  measure  fair  value  (dollars  in 
thousands): 

-37-

EAGLE  BANCORP  MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Notes to Consolidated Financial  Statements 
June 30, 2010 and 2009 

NOTE  18:  Fair  Value  Disclosures 

continued 

June  30,2010 

Level 1 
Inputs 

$ 

$" 

-

Level 2 
Inputs 
- 
2,400 

Level 3 
Inputs 

Total Fair 
Value 

$ 

1,688 

' $" 

619 

1,688 
2,400 
619 

June 30, 2009 

Level 1 
Inputs 
-

~ $" 

$ 

Level 2 
Inputs 
- 
2,389 

Level 3 
Inputs 

Total Fair 
Value 

$ 

3 

' $' 

3 
2,389 

Impaired loans 
Mortgage servicing rights 
Repossessed  assets 

Impaired loans 
Mortgage servicing rights 
Repossessed  assets 

During  the  year  ended  June  30,  2010,  certain  impaired  loans  were  remeasured  and  reported  at 
fair  value  through  a  specific  valuation  allowance  allocation  of  the  allowance  for  possible  loan 
losses  based  upon  the  fair  value  of  the  underlying  collateral.  Impaired  loans  with  a  carrying 
value  of $2,101,000 were reduced by  specific  valuation  allowance  allocations  totaling  $416,000 
to  a  total  reported  fair  value  of  $1,685,000  based  on  collateral  valuations  utilizing  Level  3 
valuation inputs. 

As  of  June  30,  2010,  mortgage  servicing  rights  were  remeasured  and  reported  at  the  lower  of 
cost  or  fair  value  through  a  valuation  allowance  based  upon  the  fair  value  of  the  calculated 
servicing rights. Servicing rights with a carrying value of $2,337,000 were lower than fair  value 
of  $2,400,000  based  on  collateral  valuations  utilizing  Level  2 valuation  inputs, and  as  such  are 
reported at the lower value of cost. 

Certain  non-fmancial  assets  and  non-financial  liabilities  measured  at  fair  value  on  a  recuning 
and  non-recuning  basis  include  goodwill,  other  intangible  assets  and  other  non-financial  long-
lived  assets.  As  stated  above,  FASB  ASC  820  will  be  applicable  to  these  fair  value 
measurements that began on January  1, 2009. 

Those  financial  instraments  not  subject  to  the  initial  implementation  of  FASB  ASC  820  are 
required  under  SFAS  107  to  disclose  the  fair  value  of  financial  instraments,  both  assets  and 
liabilities  recognized  and  not  recognized  in  the  statement  of  fmancial  position,  for  which  it  is 
practicable to estimate  fair value.  Below is a table that summarizes the fair  market values of aU 
financial  instraments  of  the  Company  at  June  30,  2010  and  2009,  followed  by  methods  and 
assumptions  that  were  used  by  the  Company  in  estimating  the  fair  value  of  the  classes  of 
financial instniments not covered by FASB ASC 820. 

The  estimated  fair  value  amounts  of  financial  instraments  have  been  determined  by  the 
Company  using  available  market 
information  and  appropriate  valuation  methodologies. 
However,  considerable judgment  is  required  to  interpret  data  to  develop  the  estimates  of  fair 
value. Accordingly,  the  estimates presented herein  are not necessarily  indicative of the  amounts 
the  Company  could  realize  in  a  cunent  market  exchange.  The  use  of  different  market 
assumptions  and/or  estimation  methodologies  may  have  a material  effect  on  the  estimated  fair 
value amounts. 

-38-

EAGLE  BANCORP MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Notes to Consolidated Financial  Statements 
June 30, 2010 and 2009 

NOTE  18:  Fair Value Disclosures -  continued 

(Dollars  in  Thousands) 

Financial Assets: 

Cash and cash equivalents 
Securities held-to-maturity 
FHLB stock 
Loans receivable, net 
Cash value oflife  insurance 

Financial Liabilities: 

June 30, 

2010 

2009 

Carrying 
Amount 

Estimated 
Fair 
Value 

Carrying 
Amount 

Estimated 
Fair 
Value 

$ 

3,509  $ 
125 
2,003 
169,502 
6,691 

3,509  $ 
125 
2,003 
176,037 
6,691 

6,328  $ 
375 
2,000 
167,197 
6,496 

6,328 
384 
2,000 
172,408 
6,496 

100,997 
88,284 

70,524 
3,899 

Deposits 
Time certificates of deposit 
Advances from the FHLB & other 
borrowings 
Subordinated debentures 

112,930 
85,009 

67,224 
5,155 

112,930 
86,770 

66,117 
3,872 

100,997 
86,202 

67,056 
5,155 

The following  methods  and  assumptions  were used by the Company  in estimating the fair  value 
ofthe  following  classes of financial  instraments. 

Cash  and  interest-bearing  accounts  -  The  carrying  amounts  approximate  fair  value  due  to  the 
relatively  short  period  of  time  between  the  origination  of  these  instraments  and  their  expected 
realization. 

Stock in the FHLB -  The fair value of stock in the FHLB approximates redemption value. 

Loans receivable -  Fair values are estimated by stratifying  the loan portfolio  into groups of loans 
with  similar  financial  characteristics.  Loans  are  segregated  by  type  such  as  real  estate, 
commercial,  and  consumer,  with  each  category  further  segmented  into fixed and  adjustable  rate 
interest terms. 

For  mortgage  loans, the  Company  uses  the  secondary  market  rates  in  effect  for  loans  that  have 
similar  characteristics.  The  fair  value  of  other  fixed  rate  loans  is  calculated  by  discounting 
scheduled  cash  flows  through  the  anticipated  maturities  adjusted  for  prepayment  estimates. 
Adjustable  interest  rate  loans  are  assumed  to  approximate  fair  value  because  they  generally 
reprice within the short term. 

Fair values are adjusted  for  credit risk based on assessment  of risk identified  with specific  loans, 
and risk adjustments  on the remaining portfolio based on credit loss experience. 

Assumptions  regarding  credit  risk  are  judgmentally  determined  using  specific  bonower 
information,  intemal  credit  quality  analysis,  and  historical  information  on  segmented  loan 
categories for non-specific  bonowers. 

-39-

EAGLE  BANCORP  MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Notes to Consolidated Financial  Statements 
June 30, 2010 and 2009 

NOTE  18:  Fair Value Disclosures -  continued 

Cash  surrender  value  of life  insurance  -  The  carrying  amount  for  cash  sunender  value  of  life 
insurance approximates fair value as policies are recorded at redemption value. 

Deposits  and  time  certificates  of deposit  -  The  fair  value  of  deposits  with  no  stated  maturity, 
such as checking, passbook, and money market,  is equal to the amount payable on demand.  The 
fair  value  of  time  certificates  of  deposit  is  based  on  the  discounted  value  of  contractual  cash 
flows.  The  discount  rate  is  estimated  using  the  rates  cunentiy  offered  for  deposits  of  similar 
maturities. 

Advances from  the  FHLB  &  Subordinated  Debentures  -  The  fair  value  of  the  Company's 
advances and debentures  are estimated using discounted  cash flow analysis based on the  interest 
rate  that  would  be  effective  June  30,  2010  and  2009,  respectively  if  the  bonowings  repriced 
according to their stated terms. 

NOTE  19:  Condensed  Parent  Company  Financial  Statements 

Set forth below is the condensed statements of financial  condition as of June 30, 2010 and 2009, 
of  Eagle  Bancorp  together  with  the  related  condensed  statements  of income  and  cash  flows  for 
the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. 

-40-

EAGLE  BANCORP  MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Notes to Consolidated Financial  Statements 
June 30, 2010 and 2009 

NOTE  19: Condensed  Parent  Company  Financial  Statements -  continued 

Condensed  Statements of Financial  Condition 
(Dollars in  Thousands) 

Assets 

Cash and cash equivalents 
Securities available for sale 
Prefened  stock - FASB ASC 825 
Investment in Eagle Bancorp  Statutory Trast I 
Investment in American Federal Savings Bank 
Other assets 

Total assets 

Liabilities and stockholders' equitv 

Accounts payable and accraed  expenses 
Long-term subordinated  debt 
Stockholders' Equity 

2010 

2009 

301 
14,892 

$ 

-
155 
42,010 
242 

318 
5,491 
25 
155 
26,688 
283 

57,600 

%_ 

32,960 

13 
5,155 
52,432 

13 
5,155 
27,792 

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity 

57,600 

%_ 

32,960 

Condensed  Statements of Income 
(Dollars in  Thousands) 

Interest income 
Interest  expense 
Noninterest  expense 
Loss before  income taxes 
Income tax  benefit 
Loss before  equity in undistributed 

2010 

2009 

387  $ 
(310) 

(144) 
(67) 
(20) 

146 
(310) 

(114) 
(278) 
(83) 

eamings of American Federal  Savings Bank 

(47) 

(195) 

Equity in undistributed  eamings 

of American Federal  Savings Bank 

Net income 

2,461 

2,583 

2,414  $ 

2,388 

-41-

EAGLE  BANCORP  MONTANA, INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Notes to Consolidated Financial  Statements 
June 30, 2010 and 2009 

NOTE  19: Condensed  Parent  Company  Financial Statements -  continued 

Condensed Statements of Cash Flow 
(Dollars in  Thousands) 

Cash flows from  operating  activities 

Net income 
Adjustments  to reconcile net income 
to net cash used in operating activities: 

Equity in undistributed  eamings 
of American Federal Savings Bank 
Other adjustments,  net 
Net cash used in operating activities 

Cash flows from  investing  activities 

Cash contribution from American Federal Savings Bank 
Cash contribution to American Federal Savings Bank 
Activity in available for sale securities 

Sales 
Maturities, prepayments and calls 
Purchases 

Net cash provided by investing activities 

Cash flows from  financing  activities 

Common stock issued 
ESOP payments and dividends 
ESOP shares purchased 
Payments to purchase treasury stock 
Dividends paid 
Net cash used in financing  activities 

Net change in cash and cash equivalents 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 

2010 

2009 

$ 

2,414  $ 

2,388 

(2,461) 
(165) 
(212) 

1,000 
(12,000) 

8 
912 
(9,830) 

(19,910) 

22,574 
136 
(1,971) 
(22) 
(612) 

20,105 

(17) 
318 

(2,583) 
94 
(101) 

1,302 

89 
279 
(1,152) 
518 

-
120 
-

(21) 

(435) 
(336) 

81 
237 

Cash  and  cash equivalents  at end  of period 

301  $ 

318 

-42-

E A G LE  BANCORP  MONTANA,  INC. AND  SUBSIDIARY 
Notes  to Consolidated  Financial  Statements 
June  30, 2010  and 2009 

N O TE  20:  Quarterly  Results  of Operations  (Unaudited) 

The  following  is  a  condensed  summary  of  quarterly  resuhs  of  operations  for  the years  ended 
June  30, 2010 and 2009: 

Year  ended  June  30, 2010 

First 
Quarter 

Second 
Quarter 

Third 
Quarter 

Fourth 
Quarter 

(Dollars in Thousands,  except per share  data) 

$ 

Interest and dividend income 
Interest expense 
Net interest income 
Loan loss provision 
Net interest income after  loan loss 

provision 

Non interest income 
Non interest expense 
Income before  income tax expense 
Income tax expense 

Net income 

Comprehensive income (loss) 

Basic eamings per common share * 

$ 

$ 

$ 

Diluted eamings per common share *  $ 

3,724  $ 
1,341 
2,383 
135 

2,248 
1,061 
2,103 
1,206 
362 
844  $ 

3,798  $ 
1,353 
2,445 
107 

2,338 
937 
2,485 
790 
237 
553  $ 

1,890  $ 

(624)  $ 

0.21  $ 

0.18  $ 

0.14  $ 

0.12  $ 

3,686  $ 
1,216 
2,470 
214 

2,256 
722 
2,254 
724 
244 
480  $ 

216  $ 

0.12  $ 

0.10  $ 

*calculated on a converted basis using a 3.8 to 1.0 exchange ratio 

Year  ended  June  30,  2009 

$ 

Interest and dividend income 
Interest expense 
Net interest income 
Loan loss provision 
Net interest income after  loan loss 

provision 

Non interest  income 
Non interest expense 
Income before  income tax expense 
Income tax expense 

Net income 

Comprehensive income (loss) 

Basic eamings per common share 

Diluted eamings per common share 

3,816  $ 
1,580 
2,236 
-

2,236 
(504) 
1,849 
(117) 
(17) 
(100)  $ 

556  $ 

0.43  $ 

0.38  $ 

3,943  $ 
1,575 
2,368 
34 

2,334 
444 
2,056 
722 
198 
524  $ 

215  $ 

0.20  $ 

0.18  $ 

3,822  $ 
1,512 
2,310 
72 

2,238 
1,526 
2,251 
1,513 
454 
1,059  $ 

236  $ 

0.50  $ 

0.44  $ 

3,690 
1,186 
2,504 
259 

2,245 
873 
2,389 
729 
192 
537 

624 

0.14 

0.14 

3,760 
1,441 
2,319 
151 

2,168 
1,533 
2,407 
1,294 
389 
905 

(921) 

0.083 

0.73 

-43-

Shareholder  Information 

STOCK  LISTING 
Symbol:  EBMT 
NASDAQ  Global 

SHAREHOLDER  SERVICES  AGENT 
Registrar  and  Transfer  Company 
10 Commerce  Drive 
Cranford,  NJ  07106-3572 
800.368.5948 
www.rtco.com 

INVESTOR  INFORMATION 
Copies  of  reports  filed  with  the  Securities  and 
Exchange  Commission  are  available  without 
charge through  the  Internet  at  www.sec.gov 
or  the  Investor  Relations  section  of  our  website 
at  www.americanfederalsavingsbank.com 

INDEPENDENT  REGISTERED  PUBLIC 
ACCOUNTING  FIRM 
Davis,  Kinard  &  Co.,  P.C. 
400  Pine  Street,  Suite  600 
Abilene,  TX  79601 
325.672.4000 
www.dkcpa.com 

CORPORATE  HEADQUARTERS 
1400  Prospect  Avenue 
Helena,  MT  59601 
406.442.3080 

SHAREHOLDER  CONTACT 
Charles  Berger,  Corporate  Secretary 
American  Federal  Savings  Bank 
P.O.  Box  4999 
Helena,  MT  59604-4999 
406.442.3080 
fax:  406.457.4013 
cberger@amfedsb.com 

CORPORATE  COUNSEL 
Nixon  Peabody,  LLP 
401  9th  Street,  N.W. 
Suite  900 
Washington,  DC  20004 
202.585.8000 
www.nixonpeabody.com 

Annual  Report  Design  by Curran  & Connors,  Inc. /  www.curran-connors.com 
Photography  by  Kurt Keller /  www.kurtkellerphoto.com 

EBMT 
N A S D AQ 
L I S T ED 

EAGLE BANCORP 
M O N T A N A, 

I N C. 

1400 PROSPECT AVENUE 
HELENA, MT 59601