eBay

 
To Our Stockholders,

In 2008, we embraced a tremendous amount of fundamental change against the backdrop of a deteriorating external
market and economy. Even with the challenges, we exited the year a stronger company and remain a leader in
e-commerce, payments and Internet voice communications. Our performance for the full year not only reflects the
strength of our portfolio, but also the operating discipline, strategic clarity and focus with which our management
team is leading the company going forward.

Financially, the company had a good year, marked by strong revenue growth, stronger EPS growth and excellent
free cash flow. Despite the extremely challenging economic environment in 2008 – including a slowdown in global
e-commerce, a strengthening dollar, and declining interest rates – we delivered $8.5 billion in revenues, an
11 percent increase from the prior year, and $1.36 of diluted EPS. We also delivered a solid operating margin of
24 percent.

The size of the eBay marketplace continues to be the largest in the world with nearly $60 billion of gross
merchandise volume (the total value of goods sold in all of our Marketplaces) in 2008. PayPal continues to
experience strong growth, both on eBay and across e-commerce, and Skype had a great year, growing both revenues
and user base.

In addition, we strengthened our portfolio by investing in the growth of our emerging businesses and through key
acquisitions. In 2008, advertising, global classifieds and StubHub, the leading online tickets marketplace, all gained
momentum in terms of revenues.

Key acquisitions we made during the year will help us build on our strengths. Fraud Sciences enhances PayPal’s risk
management capabilities. Bill Me Later further extends our leadership position in payments. And dba.dk and
BilBasen, leading classifieds sites in Denmark, broaden our global leadership in online classifieds.

Connecting buyers and sellers

In 2008, we focused on three clear priorities to both improve our core Marketplaces business and connect more
buyers and sellers than ever before.

1. Make eBay safer and easier to use

2.

Improve value and selection by combining fixed price with auction-style listings in a uniquely eBay way

3. Extend PayPal’s leadership position both on eBay and across e-commerce

We made progress in all three areas in 2008. Turning to Marketplaces, we made more fundamental changes to our
core eBay business than at any point in our history. Many of these changes were overdue and were things that our
sellers had been asking for and that our buyers had come to expect. We believe that eBay is a healthier marketplace
than it was a year ago. Our pricing is more competitive, our success is more aligned with that of our sellers, and fixed
price and auction-style listings are becoming more balanced.

While we still have a lot of work to do, the significant structural changes we made in 2008 provide the necessary
foundation to continue moving aggressively ahead to accelerate growth in our core business.

Despite increasing competition for the attention of buyers and sellers, eBay remains one of the leading e-commerce
platforms in the world. In fact, more than 85 million people came to our Marketplaces sites globally in December
2008, making eBay the most-visited retail site for holiday shopping, according to ComScore.

We also continued to expand the number of ways we connect buyers and sellers. We have strong momentum in
advertising, classifieds and StubHub. For the full year, text and graphical advertising revenue was up 139 percent,
StubHub was up 54 percent and classifieds grew 57 percent. These alternative e-commerce formats are increasingly
giving us profitable, scalable and more diverse ways to monetize our traffic and connect buyers and sellers.
Collectively, these alternative formats delivered $1 billion in revenue in 2008.

We’ve only just started to tap the enormous potential of our payments business through PayPal, especially across
e-commerce. In 2008, PayPal increased its penetration on eBay by 5 points to 58 percent, and we significantly
expanded market share outside of eBay. In fact, we reached two important milestones during the year – for the first

time, PayPal’s total payment volume (the total value of all payments made via PayPal) off eBay equaled volume on
eBay, and PayPal Merchant Services revenue nearly reached the billion-dollar mark, up 45 percent year over year.

Skype had a terrific 2008. Revenue of $551 million was up 44 percent, and registered users reached 405 million, up
47 percent from the prior year. More and more people discovered how easily Skype helps family and friends stay
connected, regardless of where they are in the world.

Across our portfolio, technology has always been a key enabler of our growth and a tool to connect and empower
millions of people globally. In 2008, we were recognized for this contribution: eBay Inc. became the first Internet
company to be awarded the National Medal of Technology and Innovation, which is America’s highest honor for
technological and scientific achievement. We’re proud of our technology heritage ... and excited about how we can
build on it in the years to come.

Within our organization, we strategically invested $1.4 billion in our portfolio and still maintained a healthy balance
sheet, ending the year with more than $3 billion in cash. During the year, we also strengthened our management
team and drove greater operating discipline across our company. As the economy began to turn, we took decisive
action early and quickly to simplify our organization, reducing our global workforce. As a result, we entered 2009
with a more prudent cost structure.

Our actions have helped us exit 2008 a stronger company, with a more diversified portfolio than ever; more effective
and diverse ways to monetize our platforms; and a proven business model that has significant growth opportunities
ahead.

A strong company getting stronger

For more than 13 years, eBay has led e-commerce by connecting buyers and sellers. In the process, eBay Inc. has
become a strong company with a leadership position in three of the Internet’s most common activities: e-commerce,
payments and Internet voice communications. Our aim is to become even stronger in 2009 and beyond.

We still have a lot of work to do in our core eBay business. Our priorities around making eBay safer and easier to
use, and improving value and selection, remain consistent for 2009. We are making the necessary, albeit tough,
changes, and we are doing so with focus and conviction.

At the same time, we have a powerful portfolio, one that we believe is not fully credited in the value of the company.
During 2009, we expect that PayPal, advertising, classifieds, StubHub and our other businesses will continue to
contribute more revenue, more earnings, and more opportunities as we grow, scale and diversify the ways in which
we connect buyers and sellers and monetize traffic. We are the global e-commerce leader, and we intend to maintain
and extend that position.

We expect that the macro-economic environment will continue to be extremely challenging in 2009, and so we have
planned conservatively. But tough times create opportunities for strong companies to get stronger. We expect to do
just that in 2009 and beyond. On behalf of our 16,200 employees worldwide, thank you for your ongoing support
and belief in our future.

Pierre Omidyar
Founder and Chairman of the Board

John Donahoe
President and CEO

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.

OR

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Transition Period from

to

.

¥

n

Commission file number 000-24821

eBay Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
2145 Hamilton Avenue
San Jose, California
(Address of principal executive offices)

77-0430924
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
95125
(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
(408) 376-7400
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:

Title of each class
Common stock

Name of exchange on which registered
The Nasdaq Global Select Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:
None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities

Act. Yes ¥

No n

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the

Exchange Act. Yes n

No ¥

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ¥

No n

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by
reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Yes ¥

No n

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a
smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company”
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ¥
Non-accelerated filer n (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange

Accelerated filer n
Smaller reporting company n

Act). Yes n

No ¥

As of June 30, 2008, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant

was $29,966,047,864 based on the closing sale price as reported on The Nasdaq Global Select Market.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable

date.

Class

Outstanding as of February 11, 2009

Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share

1,282,965,764 shares

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Part III incorporates information by reference from the definitive proxy statement for the registrant’s Annual Meeting of

Stockholders to be held on or about April 29, 2009.

(This page intentionally left blank) 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
eBay Inc.

Form 10-K
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2008

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 1.
Item 1A. Risk Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 2.
Legal Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 3.
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 4.

PART II

Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer

Purchases of Equity Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 6.
Selected Financial Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations . . .
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 8.
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure . .
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 9B. Other Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 11. Executive Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Item 12.
Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Principal Accounting Fees and Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 14.

Page

1
13
41
41
41
43

44
47
48
67
69
69
69
70

70
70

70
70
70

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

71

PART IV

i

(This page intentionally left blank) 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

PART I

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of
the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including statements that involve
expectations, plans or intentions (such as those relating to future business or financial results, new features or
services, or management strategies). You can identify these forward-looking statements by words such as “may,”
“will,” “would,” “should,” “could,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan” and other
similar expressions. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual
results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in our forward-looking statements. Such risks and
uncertainties include, among others, those discussed in “Item 1A: Risk Factors,” of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K as well as our consolidated financial statements, related notes, and the other financial information
appearing elsewhere in this report and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC.
We do not intend, and undertake no obligation, to update any of our forward-looking statements after the date of this
report to reflect actual results or future events or circumstances. Given these risks and uncertainties, readers are
cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements.

ITEM 1: BUSINESS

Overview

eBay Inc. was formed as a sole proprietorship in September 1995 and was incorporated in California in May
1996. In April 1998, we reincorporated in Delaware, and in September 1998, we completed the initial public
offering of our common stock. Our principal executive offices are located at 2145 Hamilton Avenue, San Jose,
California 95125, and our telephone number is (408) 376-7400. When we refer to “we,” “our” or “eBay” in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K, we mean the current Delaware corporation (eBay Inc.) and its California predecessor,
as well as all of its consolidated subsidiaries. When we refer to “eBay.com,” we mean the online marketplace
located at www.ebay.com and its localized counterparts. When we refer to “PayPal,” we mean the online payments
platform located at www.paypal.com and its localized counterparts. When we refer to “Skype,” we mean the Voice
over Internet Protocol, or VoIP, offerings provided by our subsidiary Skype Technologies S.A.

Our purpose is to pioneer new communities around the world built on commerce, sustained by trust and
inspired by opportunity. We provide online marketplaces for the sale of goods and services as well as other online
commerce, or ecommerce, platforms, online payment solutions and online communications offerings to a diverse
community of individuals and businesses.

We operate three primary business segments: Marketplaces, Payments and Communications. Our Market-
places segment provides the infrastructure to enable global online commerce on a variety of platforms, including the
traditional eBay.com platform, our other online platforms, such as our online classifieds businesses, our secondary
tickets marketplace (StubHub), our online shopping comparison website (Shopping.com), our apartment listing
service platform (Rent.com), as well as our fixed price media marketplace (Half.com). Our Payments segment is
comprised of our online payment solutions PayPal and Bill Me Later (which we acquired in November 2008). Our
Communications segment, which consists of Skype, enables VoIP calls between Skype users and provides low-cost
connectivity to traditional fixed-line and mobile telephones.

We generate net transaction revenues from all three of our business segments. Our net transaction revenues
from our Marketplaces segment are derived primarily from listing and final value fees paid by sellers. For our
Payments segment, net transaction revenues are generated primarily by fees paid by merchants for payment
processing services. Our Communications segment net transaction revenues are generated primarily from fees
charged to users to connect Skype’s VoIP product to traditional fixed-line and mobile telephones. These fees are
charged on a per-minute basis or on a subscription basis and we refer to these minutes as SkypeOut minutes.

We generate marketing services and other revenues from all three of our business segments. Our marketing
services are derived principally from the sale of advertisements, revenue sharing arrangements, classifieds fees,
lead referral fees. Other revenues are derived principally from interest earned from banks on certain PayPal

1

customer account balances, interest and fees earned on the Bill Me Later loan portfolio and from contractual
arrangements with third parties that provide services to all of our users.

Marketplaces

Our Marketplaces segment is comprised of online commerce platforms that enable a global community of
buyers and sellers to interact and trade with one another. Our goal is to create, maintain and expand the functionality,
safety, ease-of-use and reliability of our online commerce platforms while supporting the growth and success of our
community of users.

Marketplaces Value Proposition

We seek to attract buyers and sellers to our community by offering:

Buyers

(cid:129) Selection
(cid:129) Value
(cid:129) Trust
(cid:129) Convenience

Sellers

(cid:129) Access to broad global markets
(cid:129) Efficient marketing and distribution costs
(cid:129) Opportunity to increase sales

We believe our Marketplaces platforms make inefficient markets more efficient because:

(cid:129) Our global community of users can more easily and inexpensively communicate, exchange information and

complete transactions;

(cid:129) Our Marketplaces platforms include more than 140.0 million listings on any given day and make available to

our users a wide variety and selection of goods; and

(cid:129) We bring buyers and sellers together in a more cost-effective manner than traditional intermediaries and

available alternatives.

We seek to create a global platform that provides individuals and businesses of all types and sizes with access
to broad markets. We have aggregated a significant number of buyers, sellers and items listed for sale, which, in
turn, has resulted in a vibrant online commerce environment. Our sellers generally enjoy good conversion rates
selling goods on our Marketplaces platforms and our buyers enjoy an extensive selection of goods and services. Key
components of our community philosophy are maintaining honest and open marketplaces and treating individual
users with respect. We seek to maintain the satisfaction and loyalty of our buyers and sellers by offering a variety of
community and support features, such as announcement and bulletin boards, customer support boards and personal
pages, as well as other topical and category-specific information exchanges.

Generally speaking, our Marketplaces platforms are more effective, relative to available alternatives, at
addressing markets of scarce new goods, new items that are no longer in-season, end-of-life products and used and
vintage items. Our highest growth in recent periods, however, has been in our fixed-price listing format, primarily
for new no longer in-season items.

Our historical success has resulted largely from the size of our community of active users. We had
approximately 86.3 million active users at the end of 2008, compared to approximately 83.2 million at the end
of 2007. We define an active user as any user who bid on, bought or listed an item during the preceding 12-month
period.

Marketplaces Platforms Overview

Our Marketplaces platforms seek to bring buyers and sellers together through fully automated and easy-to-use
online websites that are generally available throughout the world at any time. The platforms include software tools
and services, some available at no charge and others for a fee, that allow buyers and sellers to trade with one another
more easily and efficiently. The Marketplaces platforms consist of our core online commerce platform, eBay.com
and its localized counterparts, and adjacent platforms consisting of our classifieds websites, as well as StubHub,
Shopping.com, Half.com, and Rent.com. Our Marketplaces platforms earn revenue from, as the case may be,

2

listing, feature, subscription and final value fees paid by sellers, lead referral fees, transaction fees and advertising
fees.

eBay.com Platform

Our Marketplaces core platform, eBay.com, includes our traditional auction-style format and fixed-price
format and has a global presence in 39 markets. In 2008, our auction-style listing format accounted for approx-
imately 55% of our gross merchandise volume, or GMV, which is the total value of all successfully closed items
between users on our Marketplaces trading platform websites during the period, regardless of whether the buyer and
seller actually consummated the transaction (excluding Rent.com, Shopping.com and our classified websites). Our
fixed-price listing format accounted for the remaining 45% of our GMV in 2008.

Auction-Style Listing Format

Our traditional auction-style format allows a seller to select a minimum price for opening bids, with the option
to set a reserve price for the item, which is the minimum price at which the seller is willing to sell the item. A seller
with appropriate feedback ratings can also sell in a “Multiple Item Auction” format, which allows a seller to sell
multiple identical items to the highest bidders.

Fixed-Price Listing Format

Our fixed-price format allows buyers and sellers to accelerate the transaction process rather than waiting for
the auction period to expire. Sellers with appropriate feedback ratings are allowed to name a price at the time the
item is listed at which they would be willing to sell the item to a buyer. Our Half.com subsidiary also provides a
fixed-price, person-to-person online commerce platform that allows people to buy and sell new and previously
owned books, movies, music and games at discounted prices.

In addition, eBay Stores enables sellers to exhibit all of their listings in one place on our eBay platform and to
describe their respective businesses through customized pages. eBay Stores provides sellers with useful tools to
build, manage, promote and track their businesses. “Store Inventory Format” listings allow sellers to list items for a
minimum 30-day listing period at a lower insertion fee and higher final value fee than regular auction-style and
fixed-price listings. As of December 31, 2008, there were approximately 516,000 online storefronts established by
users in locations around the world.

Key Services for Buyers and Sellers

We have developed a number of features on our platforms in the areas of Trust and Safety (including our
Feedback Forum, Safe Harbor Program and Verified Rights Owner Program), Customer Support and Value-Added
Tools and Services, as well as Loyalty Programs (such as PowerSeller, top buyer and coupons and buyer rewards).
These features are designed to make users more comfortable dealing with unknown trading partners and completing
commercial transactions on the Internet.

Feedback Forum: Our Feedback Forum encourages users to provide feedback ratings and comments on other
users with whom they trade. Users’ profiles, which include these feedback ratings and comments, can be viewed by
any of our other users. Every registered user has a feedback profile that may contain compliments, criticisms and/or
other comments by users who have conducted business with that user. The Feedback Forum requires feedback to be
related to specific transactions and provides an easy tool for users to match specific transactions with the user names
of their trading partners. This information is recorded in a profile that includes a feedback rating for the user, with
feedback sorted according to whether the feedback has been provided over the past month, six months or twelve
months. Users who develop positive reputations have color-coded star symbols displayed next to their user names to
indicate the number of positive feedback ratings they have received. In addition to leaving an overall feedback
rating (positive, neutral or negative) for a seller, buyers also can leave anonymous Detailed Seller Ratings (“DSR”)
that cannot be viewed by the seller in four areas: item as described, communication, shipping time and shipping and
handling charges. The Feedback Forum has several automated features designed to detect and prevent certain forms
of abuse, such as a user leaving positive feedback about himself or herself through multiple accounts. As a

3

customer-focused company, we no longer allow sellers to leave negative feedback for buyers and provide sellers
with additional tools designed to avoid negative feedback.

SafeHarbor Program: We also offer the SafeHarbor program, which provides guidelines for trading and user
dispute resolution. Our SafeHarbor staff investigates users’ complaints of possible misuse of eBay platforms and
takes appropriate action, including issuing warnings to users, ending and removing listings, or suspending users
from bidding on or listing items for sale.

Verified Rights Owner (VeRO) Program: The VeRO Program lets intellectual property rights owners request
the removal of listings that offer items or contain materials that infringe on their rights. This helps to protect
community members from purchasing items that may be counterfeit or otherwise unauthorized.

Customer Support: We devote significant resources to providing personalized, accurate and timely support
services to our community of users. Buyers and sellers can contact us through a variety of means, including email,
online text chat and, in certain circumstances, telephone. We continue to focus our resources on improving our
accessibility, increasing our capacity, expanding our category-specific support, extending our online self-help
features and improving our systems and processes to allow us to provide efficient and effective support. In addition,
top eBay sellers who qualify for our PowerSeller program receive prioritized customer support.

Value-Added Tools and Services:

eBay users have access to a variety of “pre-trade” and “post-trade” tools
and services to enhance their user experience and to make trading faster, easier and safer for them. “Pre-trade” tools
and services are intended to simplify the listing process. “Post-trade” tools and services are designed to make
transactions easier and more convenient to complete. These tools and services may not be available in all
international markets.

These tools and services include:

(cid:129) Turbo Lister, eBay Blackthorne, ProStores, Selling Manager and Selling Manager Pro, each of which helps

to automate the selling process;

(cid:129) Shipping Calculator, which makes it easier for buyers and sellers to calculate shipping costs;

(cid:129) Shipping Labels, which allows sellers to print certain postage and UPS labels;

(cid:129) eBay To Go, which allows users to embed item listings in their own Internet websites; and

(cid:129) PayPal, which facilitates the online exchange of funds.

We currently provide these services directly or through contractual arrangements with third parties.

PowerSeller program: PowerSellers are eBay’s top sellers who have consistently sustained a high volume of
monthly sales and who have a high level of positive feedback. Members of the PowerSeller program get a range of
special benefits, including pricing discounts, prioritized customer support, promotional offers, eBay promotional
merchandise, advanced selling education, opportunities to participate in research and other special rewards. The
PowerSeller program is free of charge and a special PowerSeller icon is located next to the seller’s user name if the
seller qualifies for the program.

Top buyer program: Our top buyers benefit from having a special phone number to call if they have an
unsatisfactory user experience in connection with a transaction on our websites. From time to time, we also offer
special coupon initiatives to top buyers.

Coupons and Buyer Rewards: Coupons were given to targeted buyers throughout 2008 to drive our GMV
growth. We introduced, on a limited basis, a buyer rewards program to incentivize our larger buyers to remain loyal
by offering cash back through “eBay bucks.”

Best Match: Buyers on eBay.com now see “best match” as the default search result. The best match
algorithm determines which listings appear at the top of searches based on, among other factors, relevance, detailed
seller ratings and shipping and handling charges. “Best Match” is designed to enable buyers to find the items they
are looking for more quickly and easily, incentivize sellers to provide better deals, reasonable or free shipping and

4

excellent customer service, and reduce negative buying experiences from sellers with high rates of buyer
dissatisfaction.

Other Marketplaces Platforms and Services

StubHub

StubHub is a leading U.S. ticket marketplace that enables fans to buy and sell tickets to a large selection of
sporting, concert, theater and other live entertainment events. StubHub provides a marketplace dedicated solely to
tickets and is designed to enable users to buy or sell their tickets in a secure, convenient and highly reliable
environment. Buyers and sellers pay transaction fees to StubHub when tickets are bought and sold.

Classifieds Websites

Our classifieds websites are available in hundreds of cities and regions around the world and are designed to
help people meet, share ideas and trade on a local level. Our classifieds websites include Kijiji, Den Bla˚ Avis,
Gumtree.com, LoQUo.com, OpusForum, Marktplaats.nl and mobile.de. In addition, we have a minority equity
investment in craigslist, Inc., which operates the craigslist classifieds websites around the world. Our classified
websites generate revenue primarily through advertising.

Online Advertising and Other Services

We work with strategic partners in a variety of areas, such as online advertising, mailing and other services, that
allow us to extend the monetization of our platforms and user base. We work with strategic partners and members of
our affiliate advertising network in a variety of areas, such as online advertising, mailing and other services, that
allow us to extend the monetization of our platforms and user base. In 2008, we also launched our own advertising
service that enables third parties to directly purchase text advertising promoting their eBay listings and eBay stores
to appear on our websites.

Shopping.com

Shopping.com is a leading comparison shopping destination featuring products from thousands of merchants
across the Internet. Shopping.com offers one of the largest product catalogs on the Internet — searchable by
thousands of attributes — along with consumer product reviews through Epinions.com, which help users make
informed buying decisions. Shopping.com’s revenue is earned primarily from retailers who pay a fee for shoppers
directed to their sites by Shopping.com. In addition, Shopping.com is monetized through advertising revenues.

Rent.com

Rent.com is a leading U.S. listing website in the rental housing industry. The website is designed to bring
apartment seekers and apartment managers together in an efficient manner. Landlords pay a fee to Rent.com for
renters who indicate that they have found their apartments through Rent.com.

Marketplaces Growth Strategy

We will continue to work toward our goal of creating the world’s leading ecommerce franchise by investing in

our core Marketplaces segment and continuing to build our adjacent Marketplaces businesses.

Our growth strategy is focused on reinvesting in our customers, improving the buyer experience and seller
economics by enhancing our products and services, improving Trust and Safety and customer support, extending
our product offerings into new formats, categories and geographies, and experimenting with various pricing and
buyer retention strategies. We have made significant changes in our three largest markets, the United States,
Germany and the United Kingdom to improve our buyer experience over the course of 2008, with a series of pricing,
shipping and other changes. The pricing changes reduced the upfront cost of listing fixed-price items on eBay so
that fees are now based more on the successful sale of items. In addition, final value fees also have been rebalanced
on a category-by-category basis. We encourage sellers to offer reasonable or free shipping to our buyers by

5

promoting their listings through our “Best Match” search algorithm. We are also in the process of modifying the
payment process to enhance speed and reliability.

eBay strives to offer a wide variety of inventory ranging from new in-season through end-of-life products, from
different types of sellers, in a broad variety of categories, with a favorable buyer experience and a choice between
auctions and fixed price formats, all in one place. We believe that, if successful, these measures will increase the
number of items sold on our sites.

Another element of our growth strategy is to build adjacent Marketplaces businesses, such as our classified
platforms and StubHub, which offer new formats and new monetization models, as well as opportunities for growth
beyond our core businesses.

Payments

Our payments segment is comprised of online payment solutions — PayPal (which enables individuals and
businesses to securely, easily and quickly send and receive payments online in approximately 190 markets
worldwide) and Bill Me Later (which we acquired in November 2008 and which enables online U.S. merchants to
offer, and U.S. consumers to obtain, transactional credit at the point of sale). Our Payments network builds upon the
existing financial infrastructure to create a global, real-time payment solution.

Payments Value Proposition

We believe our payment solutions make online commerce more efficient compared to traditional payment
alternatives such as checks, money orders and credit cards via merchant accounts. These traditional payment
alternatives present various obstacles to the online commerce experience, including lengthy processing time,
inconvenience and high costs. Providing a more efficient and effective payment alternative for users is essential to
creating a faster, easier and safer online commerce experience. Our online payment solutions allow customers to
send and receive funds securely, easily and quickly, and facilitate transactional credit for merchants and consumers.

Payments Solution

Buyer Value Proposition

PayPal enables buyers to pay merchants without sharing sensitive financial information. To make payments,
buyers need to disclose only their email addresses to recipients. Buyers also benefit from PayPal’s Buyer Protection
Program, which reimburses buyers using PayPal with respect to most purchases made on eBay.com. When using
Bill Me Later to obtain transactional credit, buyers need to provide only their name, address, birth date and the last
four digits of their social security number. Many buyers wary of disclosing financial information online find the
limited amount of information they are required to provide attractive. Bill Me Later also offers U.S. buyers an
opportunity to defer payments; under some promotional arrangements with select merchants, interest on such
payments can be deferred for as long as three to six months.

Seller Value Proposition

PayPal offers online merchants an all-in-one payment processing solution that is less expensive than most
credit card merchant accounts, offers industry-leading fraud prevention, and enables merchants to conduct business
with approximately 68.6 million PayPal registered active accounts in approximately 190 markets. Many of these
active accounts prefer to use PayPal over other payment methods, which may help merchants to increase sales
volume. PayPal also offers merchants the ability to maintain a direct relationship with their customers. In addition,
PayPal also offers a payment gateway service that provides merchants who already have a credit card merchant
account with a secure connection from their online store to their internet merchant account and their payment
processing network.

A merchant can generally open a PayPal account and begin accepting credit card payments within a few minutes.
Most merchants are approved instantly for a PayPal account, and do not need to provide a personal guaranty, acquire
any specialized hardware, prepare an application, contact a payment gateway or securely store customer financial
information that is maintained by PayPal instead of the merchant. Furthermore, PayPal charges lower transaction fees
than most U.S. merchant accounts, and charges no setup fees and few or no recurring monthly fees.

6

The account-based nature of PayPal’s network helps us to detect and prevent fraud when funds enter, flow
through, and exit the PayPal network. Sellers can also reduce the risk of transaction losses resulting from
unauthorized credit card use and fraudulent chargebacks if they comply with PayPal’s Seller Protection Policy.

U.S. merchants offering Bill Me Later provide buyers with various transactional credit arrangements at the

point of sale, which may help to increase sales volume and average sales orders.

PayPal Overview

Joining the Network

PayPal offers three types of accounts: Personal, Business and Premier. A new account holder typically opens
an account to send money for an eBay purchase or a purchase on another website, a payment for services rendered,
or a payment to an individual in lieu of cash or check. Allowing new account holders to join the network when they
make or receive payments encourages PayPal’s natural, user-driven growth. PayPal’s account sign-up process asks
each new account holder to provide PayPal with his or her name, street address, phone number and email address.
The account holder’s email address serves as the unique account identifier. PayPal also offers certain customers who
sell on their own websites the ability to accept credit card payments from buyers without requiring the buyer to open
a PayPal account.

Payment Transaction Overview

Buyers make payments at the PayPal website, at the eBay.com website, or at the websites of merchants that
have integrated PayPal’s Website Payments or Express Checkout features. To make a payment at PayPal’s website,
a buyer logs in to his or her account and enters the recipient’s email address and the amount of the payment. To make
a payment through eBay.com or merchant websites, a buyer selects an item for purchase, confirms the payment
information and enters his or her email address and password to authorize the payment. The buyer chooses whether
PayPal debits the money from the buyer’s PayPal balance, credit card, or bank account and the payment is then
credited to the recipient’s PayPal balance. In some bank account payments (which we call eCheck payments), the
transaction is held until the funds have cleared the sender’s bank, which typically takes three to five business days.
Once the payment is completed, the recipient can make payments to others or withdraw his or her funds at any time
via check (in the U.S.), electronic funds transfer, a PayPal-branded debit card (which is only available to U.S. users),
a prepaid card (in the U.K.), or through a credit to a recipient’s credit card account (in limited markets).

PayPal earns revenues in several ways:

(cid:129) PayPal earns transaction fees when a Business or Premier account receives a payment;

(cid:129) PayPal earns a foreign exchange fee when an account holder converts a balance from one currency to another;

(cid:129) PayPal earns fees from merchants who utilize PayPal’s Pro direct payment card processing services or

Payflow gateway processing services;

(cid:129) PayPal earns fees when a user receives payments from outside the user’s country of residence;

(cid:129) PayPal may earn fees when a user withdraws money to certain bank accounts, depending on the amount of

the withdrawal;

(cid:129) PayPal earns a return on certain customer balances; and

(cid:129) Ancillary revenues are earned from a suite of financial products, as described below.

PayPal incurs funding costs on payments at varying levels depending on the source of the payment. Funding
costs associated with credit card and debit card funded payments are significantly higher than bank account or
balance-funded payments. U.S. account holders who choose to maintain PayPal balances in U.S. dollars have the
ability to sweep balances into the PayPal Money Market Fund. This Money Market Fund, which is invested in a
portfolio managed by Barclays Global Fund Advisors, bore a current compound annual yield of 0.52% as of
February 12, 2009.

7

Verification of Account Holders

To fund payments from their bank accounts in the U.S., account holders must first become verified by PayPal.
The primary method for verification is our patented Random Deposit technique. Under this technique, PayPal
makes two deposits ranging from 1 cent to 99 cents to the account holder’s bank account. To verify ownership of the
account, the account holder then enters the two amounts as a four-digit code at the PayPal website. In addition to
allowing funding through bank accounts, verification also removes some spending limits on account holders’
accounts and gives them reputational advantages when transacting with other members of the PayPal community.
Outside of the U.S., similar verification processes are used for credit card accounts and in the limited number of
countries where PayPal offers bank funding. In certain cases specific to local markets, bank funded transactions are
permitted up to set limits before additional verification is required.

Withdrawing Money

Each account holder in the U.S. and in 64 other countries may withdraw money from his or her PayPal account
through an electronic fund transfer to his or her U.S. bank account or, in 40 of those countries, to their local bank
account. In the U.S. and seven other countries, users can withdraw their funds by a mailed check. Withdrawals by
electronic transfer in the U.S. may take three to five business days to arrive in the account holder’s bank account,
depending on the bank, and make take longer in other countries. Mailed checks may take one to two weeks to arrive.
Qualifying PayPal business users in the U.S. can receive a PayPal ATM/debit card, which provides these users with
instant access to their PayPal account balances. ATM/debit cardholders can withdraw cash from any ATM
connected to the Cirrus or Maestro networks and can make purchases at any merchant accepting MasterCard.
PayPal offers customers the opportunity to apply for a Prepaid card in the U.K., which can be linked to a customer’s
PayPal account to add or withdraw funds. In limited markets, customers can also access their money by generating a
credit to their credit card account.

PayPal’s Trust and Safety Programs

We have developed a number of PayPal trust and safety programs, including PayPal’s Seller Protection and
Buyer Protection Programs. These programs provide additional protection to certain account holders who pay or
receive payment for their transactions through PayPal on eBay. PayPal’s Seller Protection Program covers sellers
who follow specific shipping and handling practices against claims that a transaction was not authorized by the
buyer or that the item was not received. PayPal’s Buyer Protection Program reimburses the buyer in full for qualified
purchases on eBay.com at no cost if the buyer does not receive the item or if the item is significantly not as
described. In some eBay localized markets, protection for buyers is limited to a maximum amount per transaction.
In addition, our Risk Management and Fraud Investigation Teams focus on identifying and preventing fraud before
it occurs, detecting fraud in process, mitigating loss if fraud does occur and delivering information to law
enforcement around the world to better combat online fraud.

Bill Me Later Transactional Credit

Bill Me Later offers U.S. online consumers a way to obtain instant credit at the point of transaction. Bill Me
Later is not a chartered financial institution, and relies on CIT Bank to extend credit to Bill Me Later customers with
the Bill Me Later service. When a consumer makes a purchase using the Bill Me Later service, CIT Bank funds the
consumer loan at the point of sale and advances funds to the merchant. Bill Me Later subsequently purchases the
receivable related to the consumer loan extended by CIT Bank. Bill Me Later accounts are most commonly opened
on a U.S. merchant site offering Bill Me Later as a payment method, but can also be opened at the Bill Me Later
website. A buyer enters his or her birth date and the last four digits of his or her social security number and, if
approved, Bill Me Later opens an account for the buyer. This account can be used on any other U.S. merchant site
offering the Bill Me Later payment option. Once established, customers can then manage their accounts online with
access to their transaction history and monthly statements and can elect to establish recurring electronic monthly
payments. Bill Me Later earns the majority of its revenues by collecting interest on the outstanding customer
balances and collecting late fees, as well as transaction fees from merchants.

8

Bill Me Later’s alternative payment solutions help multichannel retailers to attract, satisfy and retain
customers at the point of sale. Through this offering, we believe that merchants can make successful real-time
retailing decisions, and that multichannel online retailers of all sizes can develop an effective payments strategy and
increase sales and satisfaction by providing consumers with the secure, convenient and flexible payment choices
they demand. The Bill Me Later payment solution is available on the websites of more than 1,000 online stores,
catalogs and travel partners, including Borders, Blue Nile, Bluefly, Continental Airlines, eLUXURY, Fujitsu,
JetBlue, Overstock, QVC, Toshiba, Toys “R” Us, U.S. Airways, Walmart.com and Zappos.

Payments Growth Strategy

We seek to become the online payment solution of choice around the world through our focus on simplifying
and improving the customer experience, striving to be the most secure method of payment on the Internet,
enhancing our product offering for our merchants and utilizing multiple sales channels. To establish PayPal and Bill
Me Later as the online payment solution of choice, we intend to continue focusing on increased user adoption of
PayPal on our Marketplaces platforms, continued expansion of PayPal’s Merchant Services business and our
financial products business, and expanding the offerings of Bill Me Later, including as a funding source for PayPal
accounts, as well as on an increasing number of merchant sites, including the eBay Marketplace.

Marketplaces

PayPal’s services are integrated into the checkout flow of the eBay.com platform in our key markets, including
the U.S., Germany, the U.K. and Canada. In 2008, eBay.com generated approximately $59.7 billion in GMV.
PayPal, in turn, generated approximately $30.4 billion of net Total Payment Volume from eBay.com transactions,
which represented approximately 51% of PayPal’s net Total Payment Volume during 2008. Net Total Payment
Volume is the total dollar volume of payments, net of payment reversals, successfully completed through our
Payments system, excluding PayPal’s payment gateway business.

We intend to increase PayPal’s penetration of GMVon the eBay.com platform globally by continuing to integrate
PayPal with eBay listings and new formats, including our adjacent Marketplaces businesses, focusing on buyer and
seller protection programs and adding product features and innovations important to the Marketplaces community. We
believe that our expansion into an increased number of international markets and currencies will continue to make
cross-border transactions easier and more efficient, benefiting both our Marketplaces and Payments segments.

PayPal Merchant Services

Our Merchant Services business offers a differentiated product solution for each merchant category, while
providing a cost-effective and secure payment solution across all categories. In 2008, PayPal expanded its presence
to ecommerce websites such as those of American Airlines, Omaha Steaks, Walmart.com, Zappos, BBC, Vodafone,
Deutsche Post and Ferrari. We intend to continue to market our global payments solution to spur our growth as a
payment solution off of eBay.com for sole proprietors and small, medium and large businesses.

We also intend to grow our Merchant Services business by enhancing our product offerings and leveraging our

multiple sales channels to expand our network of merchants globally.

Payments Financial Products

We will continue to identify transactions and markets not served adequately by existing payment systems and
seek to develop product features that improve upon those legacy systems. In addition, we intend to expand the
breadth of products and services available to our account holders and to continue offering financial products such as
the following:

(cid:129) PayPal ATM/Debit Card/Prepaid card, which enables business users to withdraw funds from their PayPal
accounts at ATMs, pay for offline purchases with funds from their PayPal account, and in the U.S. qualify to
receive cash back on eligible purchases;

(cid:129) PayPal Plus Credit Card and eBay MasterCard issued by GE Money Bank, which allow users to earn rewards on
purchases made offline or using PayPal, as well as a PayPal Credit Card offered to U.K. users through GE Money;

9

(cid:129) PayPal Plug In, which allows users to use their PayPal account to make payments on the Internet everywhere

that MasterCard is accepted (including websites that do not accept PayPal);

(cid:129) PayPal Money Market Fund, which allows participants to earn a yield on the funds in their PayPal

account; and

(cid:129) Bill Me Later transactional point of sale credit, which allows consumers to obtain instant credit at the point

of transaction.

Communications

Our Communications segment is comprised of Skype. Skype is a leading global Internet communications

company and is headquartered in Luxembourg, with offices in Europe, the U.S. and Asia.

Skype Value Proposition

Skype offers a simple and convenient way for people in almost every country around the world to stay in touch
over the Internet through free voice and video calls, sending instant messages, SMS (text messaging) or files, and by
making low-cost calls to landline and mobile numbers.

Skype Overview

Skype is focused on becoming the world’s leading communications software platform. Skype is software that
millions of people use everyday to make free voice and video calls from one Skype user to another. Skype generates
revenue through its premium offerings, such as calls made to and from landline and mobile phones, voicemail, call
forwarding, and SMS. Skype users can also purchase a variety of flat rate subscriptions for regional and
international calling to landlines in many different countries.

Skype’s online communications platform is built on the following:

(cid:129) Growing user base: Skype software has been downloaded more than one billion times and is available in over
28 languages. As of December 31, 2008, Skype had approximately 405.3 million registered users and was
used in almost every country around the world.

(cid:129) Product features: Skype’s product offerings are simple and easy to use and enable high-quality voice and

video calls.

(cid:129) Strong technology: Skype’s peer-to-peer network management, voice/video processing, and scalability

provide it with a competitive advantage.

(cid:129) A thriving ecosystem: As of December 31, 2008, there were more than 190 Skype Certified hardware
devices, and 15,000 third-party developers part of an ecosystem focused on enhancing the Skype experience.

Skype Growth Strategy

To expand upon Skype’s position as a leading global Internet communications company, we will continue to
focus on acquiring new active users, reducing the churn among our existing users, and converting our users to
Skype’s premium offerings. In addition, we expect that online communications will go beyond the desktop PC and
will be available across many different devices and platforms. In this regard, we are focused on leveraging our core
desktop product, increasing relevance among mobile users, diversifying among business users and increasing our
scalability through improvements to Skype’s platform.

Our strategy for driving growth in the core desktop product is built around continuously improving the quality
and ease-of-use of our products, particularly with regard to voice and video communications. For the mobile
market, Skype is focused on increasing consumers’ ability to bring their Skype functionality with them through the
development of downloadable or pre-installed applications. We are also focused on expanding Skype usage among
businesses through the introduction of new products, solutions, and partnerships designed to help businesses save
time and money and gain a competitive edge. Skype also intends to work to become more scalable and ubiquitous by
making its communications platform capable of working with other services, devices, and Web environments.

10

Other Items

Employees

As of December 31, 2008, eBay Inc. and its subsidiaries employed approximately 16,200 people (including

temporary employees), approximately 9,950 of whom were located in the U.S.

Competition

We encounter vigorous competition in our businesses from numerous sources. Our users can find, buy, sell and
pay for similar items through a variety of competing channels. These include, but are not limited to, online and
offline retailers, distributors, liquidators, import and export companies, online and offline auctioneers, catalog and
mail-order companies, classifieds, directories, search engines, products of search engines, virtually all online and
offline commerce participants (consumer-to-consumer, business-to-consumer and business-to-business), online
and offline shopping channels and networks. As our product offerings continue to broaden into new categories of
items and new commerce formats, we expect to face additional competition from other online and offline channels
for those new offerings. We compete on the basis of price, product selection, and services. Our growth rates in our
most mature markets have significantly slowed and we are losing market share in some segments. For our Payments
segment, our users may choose to pay through a variety of alternative means, including other online payment
services, offline payment methods such as cash, check or money order, and traditional online or offline credit card
merchant accounts. For our Communications segment, our users may choose to use their local telephone
companies, cable providers and other VoIP providers. To compete effectively, we may need to expend significant
resources in technology and marketing. These efforts may be expensive and could reduce our margins and have a
materially adverse effect on our business, financial position, operating results and cash flows and reduce the trading
price of our stock. We believe that we will be able to maintain profitability by preserving and expanding the size and
diversity of our users’ online community and enhancing our user experience, but despite our efforts, we may not be
able to continue to manage our operating expenses to avoid or reduce a decline in our consolidated net income. For
more information regarding these risks, see the information in “Item 1A: Risk Factors” under the caption “Our
industry is intensely competitive, and other companies or governmental agencies may allege that our behavior is
anti-competitive.”

Seasonality

Our fourth quarter has historically been our strongest quarter of sequential revenue growth. However, this was
not the case in 2008 due primarily to the impact of the global economic environment and the strengthening
U.S. dollar, which impacted the fourth quarter in particular. We expect transaction activity patterns on our websites
to increasingly mirror general consumer buying patterns. Please see the information in “Item 7: Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” under the heading “Seasonality.”

Technology

Marketplaces and Payments

Our Marketplaces and Payments platforms utilize a combination of proprietary technologies and services as
well as technologies and services provided by others. We have developed intuitive user interfaces, customer tools
and transaction processing, database and network applications that help enable our users to reliably and securely
complete transactions on our sites. Our technology infrastructure simplifies the storage and processing of large
amounts of data, eases the deployment and operation of large-scale global products and services and automates
much of the administration of large-scale clusters of computers. Our infrastructure has been designed around
industry-standard architectures to reduce downtime in the event of outages or catastrophic occurrences. We are
continually improving our technology to enhance the customer experience and to increase efficiency, scalability and
security. For information regarding technology related risks, see the information in “Item 1A: Risk Factors” under
the captions “Our failure to cost-effectively manage certain aspects of our business could harm us,” and “System
failures could harm our business.”

11

Communications

Skype’s VoIP communication and other services are delivered through a peer-to-peer network architecture, in
which users joining the network provide a significant portion of the technology resources (for example, computer
bandwidth and hardware) that enable Skype’s products. To access Skype’s products, users download Skype
software over the Internet. Skype utilizes a combination of proprietary technologies and products as well as
technologies and products provided by third parties to design, develop and support its products. For more
information regarding Skype’s technology risks, see the information in “Item 1A: Risk Factors” under the caption
“Skype depends on key technology that is licensed from third parties.”

Intellectual Property

We regard the protection of our intellectual property as critical to our success. We have entered into
confidentiality and invention assignment agreements with our employees and contractors, and nondisclosure
agreements with parties with whom we conduct business in order to limit access to and disclosure of our proprietary
information.

We aggressively protect our intellectual property rights by relying on federal, state and common law rights, as
well as a variety of administrative procedures. We actively pursue the registration of our trademarks, copyrights,
patents and domain names in the U.S. and international jurisdictions. The expansion of our business has required us
to protect our trademarks, patents and domain names in an increasing number of jurisdictions, a process that is
expensive, may require litigation, and may not be successful in every location. We have registered our core brands
as trademarks and domain names in the U.S. and a large number of other jurisdictions and have in place an active
program to continue to secure trademarks and domain names that correspond to our brands in markets of interest. If
we are unable to secure our trademarks or domain names, we could be adversely affected in any jurisdiction in
which our trademarks or domain names are not registered.

Third parties have from time to time claimed, and others may claim in the future, that we have infringed their
intellectual property rights. We currently are involved in several such legal proceedings. Please see the information
in “Item 3: Legal Proceedings” and in “Item 1A: Risk Factors” under the captions “We are subject to patent
litigation” and “We may be unable to protect or enforce our own intellectual property rights adequately.”

Segments and Geographic Information

For an analysis of financial information about our segments as well as our geographic areas, see “Note 4 —

Segments” to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Available Information

Our Internet address is www.ebay.com. Our investor relations website is located at http://investor.ebay.com. We
make available free of charge on our investor relations website under the heading “SEC Filings” our Annual Reports
on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports as
soon as reasonably practicable after such materials are electronically filed with (or furnished to) the SEC.
Information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

12

ITEM 1A: RISK FACTORS

Risk Factors That May Affect Results of Operations and Financial Condition

The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing us. Other events that we do not
currently anticipate or that we currently deem immaterial also may affect our results of operations and financial
condition.

Our operating results may decline.

Our operating results have varied on a quarterly basis during our operating history. Our operating results may
fluctuate significantly as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are outside our control. Factors that may
affect our operating results include the following:

(cid:129) general economic conditions, including the possibility of a severe and protracted recession in the U.S. and
worldwide economic slowdown; recent disruptions to the credit and financial markets in the U.S. and
worldwide; and those economic conditions specific to the Internet, ecommerce and payments industries;

(cid:129) our ability to retain an active user base, attract new users, and encourage existing users to list items for sale,
purchase items through our websites, or use our payment service or communication software and products,
especially when consumer spending is contracting;

(cid:129) our ability to reduce the loss of active buyers and sellers and increase activity of the users of our
Marketplaces business, especially with respect to our top buyers and sellers, and especially in the U.S.,
Germany and the U.K.;

(cid:129) our ability to successfully integrate and manage businesses that we acquire, including new needs to manage

credit risks and bad debts following our acquisition of Bill Me Later in November 2008;

(cid:129) our ability to manage funding costs associated with our new Bill Me Later business;

(cid:129) the volume, velocity, size, timing, monetization, and completion rates of transactions using our websites or

technology;

(cid:129) the amount and timing of operating costs and capital expenditures relating to the maintenance and expansion

of our businesses, operations, and infrastructure;

(cid:129) the primary and second-order effects of previously announced and possible future changes to our pricing,
products and policies, including, among other changes: a reduced emphasis on upfront fees (e.g., insertion
fees for listings) and corresponding increases in success-based fees (e.g., final value fees for sold items); new
algorithms for determining which listings appear at the top of searches (Best Match); changes to buyer and
seller feedback criteria; tighter seller standards, which may restrict some sellers from selling on our websites
even if they have been able to do so historically; new restrictions or holds on payments made to certain
sellers or in connection with certain categories of higher-risk transactions; new incentives and rewards for
top PowerSellers; increased protection for buyers who pay for eligible transactions on eBay.com using
PayPal, as well as improved seller protection for U.S. eBay sellers against certain claims, chargebacks and
reversals; lower insertion fees for, and extended duration of, listings of fixed-price items; shipping and
handling limits on certain categories of items (e.g., media); and requiring sellers to accept at least one
accepted payment method (and restricting sellers from referencing non-permitted payment methods,
including paper forms of payment such as checks and money orders), on eBay.com in the U.S. for most
categories of items;

(cid:129) regulatory and legal actions imposing obligations on our businesses or our users, including the injunction

related to certain cosmetic and perfume brands (see “Item 3 — Legal Proceedings” below);

(cid:129) new laws or regulations, or interpretations of existing laws or regulations, that impose liability on us for
actions of our users or otherwise harm our business models or restrict the Internet, electronic commerce,
online payments, or online communications;

13

(cid:129) our ability to meet regulatory requirements as we expand the range and geographical scope of PayPal’s

services and the range of services (and marketing programs) offered by Skype;

(cid:129) the actions of our competitors, including the introduction of new sites, services, and products;

(cid:129) consumer confidence in the safety and security of transactions using our websites or technology and our

ability to manage the costs of our user protection programs;

(cid:129) our ability to manage PayPal’s payment funding mix and the transaction loss rate in our Payments business;

(cid:129) the costs and results of litigation that involves us;

(cid:129) our ability to develop product enhancements, programs, and features at a reasonable cost and in a timely

manner;

(cid:129) our ability to upgrade and develop our systems, infrastructure, and customer service capabilities to
accommodate growth and to improve our websites at a reasonable cost while maintaining 24/7 operations;

(cid:129) technical difficulties or service interruptions involving our websites or services provided to us or our users by

third parties;

(cid:129) our ability to comply with the requirements of entities whose services are required for our operations, such as

credit card networks and banks;

(cid:129) our ability to manage, profitably expand and effectively monetize the Skype business;

(cid:129) our ability to manage our businesses following recent reductions in our workforce;

(cid:129) the cost and availability of online and traditional advertising, and the success of our brand building and

marketing campaigns;

(cid:129) our ability to attract new personnel in a timely and effective manner and to retain key employees;

(cid:129) the continued healthy operation of our technology suppliers and other parties with which we have

commercial relations;

(cid:129) continued consumer acceptance of the Internet as a medium for commerce and communication in the face of
increasing publicity about fraud, spoofing, phishing, viruses, spyware, malware and other dangers of the
Internet; and

(cid:129) macroeconomic and geopolitical events affecting commerce generally.

The increased variety of services offered on our websites makes it difficult for us to forecast the level or source
of our revenues or earnings accurately. In view of the rapidly evolving nature of our business, we believe that period-
to-period comparisons of our operating results may not be meaningful, and you should not rely upon them as an
indication of future performance. We do not have backlog, and substantially all of our net revenues each quarter
come from transactions involving sales or payments during that quarter. Due to the inherent difficulty in forecasting
revenues, it is also difficult to forecast income statement expenses as a percentage of net revenues. Quarterly and
annual income statement expenses as a percentage of net revenues may be significantly different from historical or
projected rates. Our operating results in one or more future quarters may fall below the expectations of securities
analysts and investors. In that event, the trading price of our common stock would almost certainly decline.

We invest heavily in marketing and promotion, customer support, protection programs, technology and further
development of the operating infrastructure for our core and non-core operations. Some of this investment entails
long-term contractual commitments. As a result, we may be unable to adjust our spending rapidly enough to
compensate for any unexpected revenue shortfall, which may harm our profitability. Growth rates of our
Marketplaces businesses in our most established markets, such as the U.S., Germany and the U.K., have continued
to decline. Despite our efforts to stem these declines, growth rates in these and other markets may continue to
decline. As our penetration in established markets grows, we will increasingly need to focus on keeping existing
users, especially our top buyers and sellers, active and increasing their activity level on our websites in order to
continue to grow our business. In addition, our Marketplaces business is facing increased competitive pressure. If

14

we are unable to change our services in ways that reflect the changing demands of the ecommerce marketplace,
particularly the higher growth of sales of fixed-price items and higher service levels, our business will suffer.

In January and June 2008, we announced significant changes to our Marketplaces business in four major areas:
fee structure, seller incentives, standards and buyer and seller feedback and increased buyer and seller protections in
the U.S. In August 2008, we announced a series of pricing, shipping and other changes for our Marketplaces
business in our three largest markets: the U.S., Germany and the U.K. We may make further changes in these or
other areas in the future. Some of the changes that we have announced to date have been controversial with, and led
to dissatisfaction among, our sellers, and additional changes that we announce in the future may also be negatively
received by a number of our sellers. Given the number of recent changes that we have made to our policies and
pricing, it may take a number of our sellers some time to fully assess and adjust to these changes, and sellers may
elect to reduce volume while making such assessments and adjustments. If any of these changes cause sellers to
move their business (in whole or in part) away from our websites or otherwise fail to improve gross merchandise
volume or the number of successful listings, our operating results and profitability will be harmed.

In addition, because a large percentage of PayPal transactions originate on the eBay platform, declines in
growth rates in major Marketplaces markets also adversely affect PayPal’s growth rate. The expected future growth
of our PayPal, Skype, StubHub, and other lower margin businesses may also cause downward pressure on our profit
margins because those businesses have lower gross margins than our Marketplaces platforms.

An economic recession could harm our business.

Our Marketplaces and Payments businesses are dependent on consumer purchases. The current economic
downturn has resulted in reduced selling prices and may reduce the volume of purchases on our Marketplaces
platforms and the volume of transactions paid for using our PayPal payment service, and adversely affect our
business. In addition, an economic downturn will likely continue to require us to increase our reserves for bad debt
and transaction losses. Continuing poor economic conditions will likely continue these trends.

We are exposed to fluctuations in currency exchange rates and interest rates.

Because we conduct a significant and growing portion of our business outside the United States but report our
results in U.S. dollars, we face exposure to adverse movements in currency exchange rates. In connection with its
multi-currency service, PayPal fixes exchange rates twice per day, and may face financial exposure if it incorrectly
fixes the exchange rate or if exposure reports are delayed. PayPal also holds some corporate and customer funds in
non-U.S. currencies, and thus its financial results are affected by the translation of these non-U.S. currencies into
U.S. dollars. In addition, the results of operations of many of our internationally focused websites are exposed to
foreign exchange rate fluctuations as the financial results of the applicable subsidiaries are translated from the local
currency into U.S. dollars upon consolidation. If the U.S. dollar weakens against foreign currencies, the translation
of these foreign currency denominated transactions will result in increased net revenues, operating expenses, and
net income. Similarly, our net revenues, operating expenses, and net income will be negatively impacted if the
U.S. dollar strengthens against foreign currencies, as happened in the second half of 2008. Based on changes in
foreign currency rates year over year, net revenues in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 were positively
impacted by foreign currency translation of $190.9 million, compared to the prior fiscal year. However, net revenues
in the three months ended December 31, 2008 were negatively impacted by foreign currency translation of
$104.9 million, compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year. Similarly, based on changes in foreign currency
rates year over year, operating income for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 was positively impacted by
foreign currency translation of $130.6 million, compared to the prior fiscal year, but operating income for the three
months ended December 31, 2008 was negatively impacted by foreign currency translation of $39.0 million,
compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year. As exchange rates vary, net sales and other operating results,
when translated, may differ materially from expectations. In particular, to the extent the U.S. dollar strengthens
against the Euro, British pound, Australian dollar, or Canadian dollar, our foreign revenues and profits will be
reduced as a result of these translation adjustments. While from time to time we enter into transactions to hedge
portions of our foreign currency translation exposure, it is impossible to perfectly predict or completely eliminate
the effects of this exposure. In addition, to the extent the U.S. dollar strengthens against the Euro, the British pound,
the Australian dollar, and the Canadian dollar, cross-border trade related to purchases of dollar-denominated goods

15

by non-U.S. purchasers will likely decrease, and that decrease will likely not be offset by a corresponding increase
in cross-border trade involving purchases by U.S. buyers of goods denominated in other currencies, adversely
affecting our business.

In addition, we face exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. For example, recent reductions in interest rates
have reduced our investment income, including income we earn on PayPal balances, which in turn has materially
lowered our net interest income.

The listing or sale by our users of pirated or counterfeit items may harm our business.

We have received in the past, and we anticipate receiving in the future, communications alleging that certain
items listed or sold through our service by our users infringe third-party copyrights, trademarks and trade names, or
other intellectual property rights. Although we have sought to work actively with the owners of intellectual property
rights to eliminate listings offering infringing items on our websites, some rights owners have expressed the view
that our efforts are insufficient. Content owners and other intellectual property rights owners have been active in
asserting their purported rights against online companies, including eBay. Allegations of infringement of intel-
lectual property rights have resulted in threats of litigation and actual litigation against us from time to time by rights
owners, including litigation brought by luxury brand owners such as Tiffany & Co. in the U.S., Rolex S.A. in
Germany, Louis Vuitton Malletier and Christian Dior Couture in France, L’Oréal SA, Lancôme Parfums et Beauté
& Cie, and Laboratoire Garnier & Cie in several European countries. The plaintiffs in these cases seek to hold eBay
liable for alleged counterfeit items listed on our sites by third parties, for “tester” and other not for resale consumer
products listed on our sites by third parties, for the alleged misuse of trademarks or copyrights in listings or
otherwise on our sites, or in connection with paid search advertisements, or for alleged violations of selective
distribution channel laws or parallel import laws for listings of authentic items. Such plaintiffs seek, among other
things, injunctive relief and damages. In the aggregate, these suits could result in significant damage awards and
could adversely affect our business. In June 2008, the Paris Court of Commerce ruled in the Louis Vuitton Malletier
and Christian Dior Couture cases that eBay and eBay International AG were liable for failing to prevent the sale of
counterfeit items on its websites that traded on plaintiffs’ brand names and for interfering with the plaintiffs’
selective distribution network. The court awarded the plaintiffs approximately EUR 38.6 million in damages and
issued an injunction prohibiting all sales of perfumes and cosmetics bearing the Dior, Guerlain, Givenchy and
Kenzo brands over all worldwide eBay sites to the extent they are accessible from France. We have taken measures
to comply with the injunction and have appealed these rulings. However, these and similar suits may force us to
modify our business practices, which could lower our revenue, increase our costs or make our websites less
convenient to our customers. Any such results could materially harm our business.

In addition to litigation from rights owners, we may be subject to regulatory, civil or criminal proceedings and
penalties if the authorities feel we have aided in the sale of counterfeit goods. While we have had some early success
in defending against such litigation, more recent cases have been based, at least in part, on different legal theories
than those of earlier cases, and there is no guarantee that we will continue to be successful in defending against such
litigation. For example, the German Federal Supreme Court has ruled that we may owe duties, under certain
circumstances, to content owners and competitors relating to taking reasonable steps to prevent the listing of illegal,
counterfeit, and pirated items. Plaintiffs in recent cases have argued that we are not entitled to safe harbors under the
Digital Millennium Copyright Act in the U.S. or as a hosting provider in the European Union because of the alleged
active nature of our involvement with our sellers, and that, whether or not such safe harbors are available, we should
be found liable because we supposedly have not adequately removed counterfeit listings or effectively suspended
users who have created such listings. We are constantly improving and modifying our efforts to eliminate
counterfeit and pirated items. These improvements are in response to ongoing business initiatives designed to
reduce bad buyer experiences and improve customer satisfaction as well as in response to new patterns we are
seeing among counterfeiters and others committing fraud on our users. Notwithstanding these efforts, we believe
that the legal climate, especially in Europe, is becoming more adverse to our arguments, which may require us to
take actions which could lower our revenues, increase our costs, or make our websites less convenient to our
customers, which may materially harm our business. In addition, a public perception that counterfeit or pirated
items are commonplace on our site, even if factually incorrect, could damage our reputation and our business.

16

Content owners and other intellectual property rights owners may also seek to bring legal action against
entities that are peripherally involved in the sale of infringing items, such as payment companies. To the extent that
intellectual property rights owners bring legal action against PayPal based upon the use of PayPal’s payment
services in a transaction involving the sale of infringing items, including on our websites, our business could be
harmed.

We are subject to patent litigation.

We have repeatedly been sued for allegedly infringing other parties’ patents. Some of these ongoing suits are
described under the heading “Item 3 — Legal Proceedings,” below. We are a defendant in other patent suits and we
have been notified of several other potential patent disputes, and expect that we will increasingly be subject to patent
infringement claims involving various aspects of our Marketplaces, Payments and Communications businesses as
our services expand in scope and complexity. These claims, whether meritorious or not, are time consuming and
costly to resolve, and could require expensive changes in our methods of doing business, could require us to enter
into costly royalty or licensing agreements, or could require us to cease conducting certain operations.

Use of our services for illegal purposes could harm our business.

The law relating to the liability of providers of online services for the activities of their users on their service is
often challenged in the U.S. and internationally. In violation of our policies, unlawful goods and stolen goods have
been listed and traded on our services. We may be unable to prevent our users from selling unlawful or stolen goods
or unlawful services or selling goods or services in an unlawful manner, and we may be subject to allegations of civil
or criminal liability for unlawful activities carried out by users through our services. We have been subject to several
lawsuits based upon such allegations. In December 2004, an executive of Baazee.com, our Indian subsidiary, was
arrested in connection with a user’s listing of a pornographic video clip on that website. We continue to contest the
charges related to this arrest. Similarly, our Korean subsidiary and one of its employees were found criminally liable
for listings on the Korean subsidiary’s website. The German Federal Supreme Court has ruled that we may have a
duty to take reasonable measures to prevent prohibited DVDs from being sold on our site to minors and that
competitors may be able to enforce this duty. In a number of circumstances, third parties have alleged that our
services aid and abet certain violations of certain laws, including antiscalping laws with respect to the resale of
tickets, laws regarding the sale of counterfeit items, the fencing of stolen goods, and restrictive distribution laws and
distance selling laws.

Although we have prohibited the listing of stolen goods and certain high-risk items and implemented other
protective measures, we may be required to spend substantial resources to take additional protective measures or
discontinue certain service offerings, any of which could harm our business. Any costs incurred as a result of
potential liability relating to the alleged or actual sale of unlawful goods or the unlawful sale of goods could harm
our business. In addition, we have received significant and continuing media attention relating to the listing or sale
of unlawful goods and stolen goods using our services. This negative publicity, even if factually incorrect, could
damage our reputation, diminish the value of our brand names and make users reluctant to use our services.

PayPal’s payment system is also susceptible to potentially illegal or improper uses. These may include illegal
online gambling, fraudulent sales of goods or services, illicit sales of prescription medications or controlled
substances, piracy of software and other intellectual property, money laundering, bank fraud, child pornography
trafficking, prohibited sales of alcoholic beverages or tobacco products, and online securities fraud. Recent changes
in law have increased the penalties for intermediaries providing payment services for certain illegal activities.
Despite measures PayPal has taken to detect and lessen the risk of this kind of conduct, including PayPal’s ability to
take legal action to recover its losses for certain violations of its acceptable use policy, illegal activities could still be
funded using PayPal. Any resulting claims or liabilities could adversely affect our business.

We are subject to risks associated with information disseminated through our service.

The law relating to the liability of online services companies for information carried on or disseminated
through their services is often unsettled. Claims could be made against online services companies under both
U.S. and foreign law for defamation, libel, invasion of privacy, negligence, copyright or trademark infringement, or

17

other theories based on the nature and content of the materials disseminated through their services. Several private
lawsuits seeking to impose liability under a number of these theories have been brought against us, as well as other
online service companies. In addition, domestic and foreign legislation has been proposed that would prohibit or
impose liability for the transmission over the Internet of certain types of information. Our service features a
Feedback Forum, which includes information from users regarding other users. Although all such feedback is
generated by users and not by us, claims of defamation or other injury have been made in the past and could be made
in the future against us for not removing content posted in the Feedback Forum.

Furthermore, several court decisions arguably have narrowed the scope of the immunity provided to Internet
service providers like us under the Communications Decency Act. For example, the Ninth Circuit recently held that
certain immunity provisions under the Communications Decency Act might not apply to the extent that a website
owner materially contributes to the development of unlawful content on its website. In addition, the Paris Court of
Commerce has ruled in the Louis Vuitton Malletier and Christian Dior Couture cases that applicable laws protecting
passive internet “hosts” from liability are inapplicable to eBay given that the content in question was provided by
users under eBay’s control and authority. This trend, if continued, may increase our potential liability to third parties
for the user-provided content on our sites, particularly in jurisdictions outside the U.S. where laws governing
Internet transactions are unsettled. If we become liable for information provided by our users and carried on our
service in any jurisdiction in which we operate, we could be directly harmed and we may be forced to implement
new measures to reduce our exposure to this liability, including expending substantial resources or discontinuing
certain service offerings, which would negatively affect our financial results. In addition, the increased attention
focused upon liability issues as a result of these lawsuits and legislative proposals could require us to incur
additional costs and harm our reputation and our business.

Government inquiries may lead to charges or penalties.

A large number of transactions occur on our websites on a daily basis. Government regulators have received a
significant number of consumer complaints about both eBay and PayPal, which, while small as a percentage of our
total transactions, are large in aggregate numbers. As a result, from time to time we have been contacted by various
foreign and domestic governmental regulatory agencies that have questions about our operations and the steps we
take to protect our users from fraud. PayPal has received inquiries regarding its restriction and disclosure practices
from the Federal Trade Commission and regarding these and other business practices from the attorneys general of a
number of states. In September 2006, PayPal entered into a settlement agreement with the attorneys general of a
number of states under which it agreed to pay $1.7 million to the attorneys general, shorten and streamline its user
agreement, increase educational messaging to users about funding choices, and communicate more information
regarding protection programs to users. We currently face inquiries from government regulators in various
jurisdictions related to actions that we have taken that are designed to improve the safety of transactions on
our websites, most notably by requiring PayPal to be offered and/or used for certain high-risk transactions or by
certain sellers in certain jurisdictions, and we may face similar inquires from other government regulators in the
future. For example, the Reserve Bank of Australia is currently reviewing our policy requiring sellers to offer
PayPal as a payment alternative on most transactions on our localized Australian website and precluding sellers
from imposing a surcharge or any other fee for accepting PayPal as a payment method. Similarly, Bill Me Later has
from time to time received customer complaints that could result in investigations into Bill Me Later’s business
practices by state or federal regulators. As a result of the current credit crisis, we expect new laws and regulations to
be imposed on providers of credit. We are likely to receive additional inquiries from regulatory agencies in the
future, including under existing or new credit laws or regulations, which may lead to action against us. We have
responded to all inquiries from regulatory agencies by describing our current and planned antifraud efforts,
customer support procedures, operating procedures and disclosures. If one or more of these agencies is not satisfied
with our response to current or future inquiries, we could be subject to enforcement actions, fines or other penalties,
or forced to change our operating practices in ways that could harm our business.

We are subject to general litigation and regulatory disputes.

From time to time, we are involved in other disputes or regulatory inquiries that arise in the ordinary course of
business. The number and significance of these disputes and inquiries have increased as our business expands and

18

our company grows larger. We have in the past been forced to litigate such claims. We may also become more
vulnerable to third-party claims as laws such as the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, the Lanham Act and the
Communications Decency Act are interpreted by the courts and as we expand geographically into jurisdictions
where the underlying laws with respect to the potential liability of online intermediaries such as ourselves are either
unclear or less favorable. Any claims or regulatory actions against us, whether meritorious or not, could be time
consuming result in costly litigation, damage awards, injunctive relief, or increased costs of business through
adverse judgment or settlement, require us to change our business practices in expensive ways, require significant
amounts of management time, result in the diversion of significant operational resources, or otherwise harm our
business.

Failure to deal effectively with fraudulent transactions and customer disputes would increase our loss rate
and harm our business.

Beginning in October 2008, buyers who pay for transactions on eBay.com with PayPal are protected on
eligible transactions for the full amount of an item’s purchase price if the buyer does not receive the goods they
purchased or if the goods differ significantly from what was described by the seller. Furthermore, U.S. sellers on
eBay.com have received improved seller protection for eligible transactions in which the seller is paid with PayPal,
in that they are covered against payment reversals due to buyer claims of an unauthorized payment or an item that
was not received, so long as the seller follows specified shipping and handling practices. We also enhanced our
buyer and seller protections in certain eBay international marketplaces. These changes to PayPal’s buyer protection
program could result in future increases and fluctuations in our Payments transaction loss rate. For the fiscal years
ended December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2008, our Payments transaction losses (including both direct losses
and buyer protection payouts) totaled $139.3 million and $171.5 million, representing 0.29% and 0.29% of our
net Total Payment Volume in each period, respectively.

PayPal’s highly automated and liquid payment service makes PayPal an attractive target for fraud. In
configuring its service, PayPal continually strives to maintain the right balance of appropriate measures to promote
both convenience and security for customers. Identity thieves and those committing fraud using stolen credit card or
bank account numbers can potentially steal large amounts of money from businesses such as PayPal. We believe
that several of PayPal’s current and former competitors in the electronic payments business have gone out of
business or significantly restricted their businesses largely due to losses from this type of fraud. While PayPal uses
advanced anti-fraud technologies, we expect that technically knowledgeable criminals will continue to attempt to
circumvent PayPal’s anti-fraud systems using increasingly sophisticated methods. In addition, PayPal’s service
could be subject to employee fraud or other internal security breaches, and PayPal may be required to reimburse
customers for any funds stolen as a result of such breaches. Merchants could also request reimbursement, or stop
using PayPal, if they are affected by buyer fraud.

PayPal incurs substantial losses from merchant fraud, including claims from customers that merchants have
not performed or that their goods or services do not match the merchant’s description. PayPal also incurs losses from
claims that the customer did not authorize the purchase, from buyer fraud, from erroneous transmissions, and from
customers who have closed bank accounts or have insufficient funds in them to satisfy payments. In addition to the
direct costs of such losses, if they are related to credit card transactions and become excessive, they could result in
PayPal losing the right to accept credit cards for payment. If PayPal were unable to accept credit cards, the velocity
of trade on eBay could decrease and result in corresponding decreases in our net Total Payment Volume, in which
case our business would further suffer. Bill Me Later is similarly subject to the risk of fraudulent activity associated
with merchants, users of the Bill Me Later service and third parties handling its user information, which could
increase our exposure to transaction losses and reduce the profitability of Bill Me Later’s business. Our Payments
business has taken measures to detect and reduce the risk of fraud, but these measures need to be continually
improved and may not be effective against new and continually evolving forms of fraud or in connection with new
product offerings. If these measures do not succeed, our business will suffer.

eBay faces similar risks with respect to fraudulent activities on its websites. eBay periodically receives
complaints from users who may not have received the goods that they had purchased. In some cases individuals have
been arrested and convicted for fraudulent activities using our websites. eBay also receives complaints from sellers
who have not received payment for the goods that a buyer had contracted to purchase. Non-payment may occur

19

because of miscommunication, because a buyer has changed his or her mind and decided not to honor the contract to
purchase the item, or because the buyer bid on the item maliciously in order to harm either the seller or eBay. In
some European and Asian jurisdictions, buyers may also have the right to withdraw from a sale made by a
professional seller within a specified time period. While sometimes eBay can suspend the accounts of users who fail
to fulfill their payment or delivery obligations to other users, eBay does not have the ability to require users to make
payment or deliver goods, or otherwise make users whole other than through our limited buyer protection programs.
Other than through these programs, eBay does not compensate users who believe they have been defrauded by other
users, although users who pay through PayPal may have reimbursement rights from their credit card company or
bank, which in turn will seek reimbursement from PayPal. eBay also periodically receives complaints from buyers
as to the quality of the goods purchased. We expect to continue to receive communications from users requesting
reimbursement or threatening or commencing legal action against us if no reimbursement is made. Our liability for
these sort of claims is only beginning to be clarified in some jurisdictions and may be higher in some
non-U.S. jurisdictions than it is in the U.S. Litigation involving liability for third-party actions could be costly
for us, divert management attention, result in increased costs of doing business, lead to adverse judgments, or
otherwise harm our business. In addition, affected users will likely complain to regulatory agencies that could take
action against us, including imposing fines or seeking injunctions.

Negative publicity and user sentiment generated as a result of fraudulent or deceptive conduct by users of our
Marketplaces and Payments services could damage our reputation, reduce our ability to attract new users or retain
our current users, diminish the value of our brand names. We believe that negative user experiences are one of the
primary reasons users stop using our services.

Any factors which reduce cross-border trade could harm our business.

Cross-border transactions using our websites generally provide higher revenues and gross margins than similar
transactions that take place within a single country due to higher transaction fees we earn for those transactions.
Cross-border trade has become an increasingly important source of both revenue and profits for us. To the extent
that any factors result in a net reduction in cross-border trade, including, among other factors, fluctuations in
exchange rates, the application of specific national or regional laws (e.g., selective distribution channel laws) to
users in other countries, or any other factors impose restrictions on, or increase the costs of, shipping goods across
national borders, our business would suffer. We believe that recent increases in the relative value of the U.S. dollar
versus other currencies have reduced cross-border trade between U.S. sellers and foreign buyers, without a
corresponding increase in cross-border traffic in the other direction, adversely affecting our business.

Our business is subject to online security risks, including security breaches and identity theft.

To succeed, online commerce and communications must provide a secure transmission of confidential
information over public networks. Our security measures may not detect or prevent security breaches that could
harm our business. Currently, a significant number of our users authorize us to bill their credit card accounts directly
for all transaction fees charged by us. PayPal’s users routinely provide credit card and other financial information.
We rely on encryption and authentication technology licensed from third parties to provide the security and
authentication to effectively secure transmission of confidential information, including customer credit card
numbers. Advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries in the field of cryptography or other developments
may result in a compromise or breach of the technology used by us to protect transaction data. In addition, any party
who is able to illicitly obtain a user’s password could access the user’s transaction data. An increasing number of
websites have reported breaches of their security. Any compromise of our security could harm our reputation and,
therefore, our business, and could result in a violation of applicable privacy and other laws. In addition, a party that
is able to circumvent our security measures could misappropriate proprietary information, cause interruption in our
operations, damage our computers or those of our users, or otherwise damage our reputation and business. Under
credit card rules and our contracts with our card processors, if there is a breach of credit card information that we
store, or that is stored by PayPal’s direct credit card processing customers, we could be liable to the credit card
issuing banks for their cost of issuing new cards and related expenses. In addition, if we fail to follow credit card
industry security standards, even if there is no compromise of customer information, we could incur significant

20

fines or lose our ability to give customers the option of using credit cards to fund their payments or pay their fees. If
we were unable to accept credit cards, our business would be seriously damaged.

eBay’s Korean subsidiary, IAC, has notified a majority of its approximately 20 million users of a data breach
involving personally identifiable information including name, address, resident registration number and some
transaction and refund data (but not including credit card information or real time banking information).
Approximately 141,000 users have sued IAC over this breach in several lawsuits and we expect more to do so
in the future. There is some precedent in Korea for a court to grant “consolation money” for data breaches without a
specific finding of harm from the breach. Such precedents have involved payments of up to approximately $200 per
IAC make payments of
user. A consumer agency recently made a non-binding recommendation that
50,000-100,000 Korean won (approximately $35-70) to consumers who had complained to it as a result of such
breach. IAC intends to vigorously defend itself in this lawsuit.

Our servers are also vulnerable to computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins, and similar disruptions,
and we have experienced “denial-of-service” type attacks on our system that have made all or portions of our
websites unavailable for periods of time. We may need to expend significant resources to protect against security
breaches or to address problems caused by breaches. These issues are likely to become more difficult as we expand
the number of places where we operate. Security breaches, including any breach by us or by parties with which we
have commercial relationships that result in the unauthorized release of our users’ personal information, could
damage our reputation and expose us to a risk of loss or litigation and possible liability. Our insurance policies carry
low coverage limits, which may not be adequate to reimburse us for losses caused by security breaches.

Our users, as well as those of other prominent Internet companies, have been and will continue to be targeted
by parties using fraudulent “spoof” and “phishing” emails to misappropriate passwords, credit card numbers, or
other personal information or to introduce viruses through “trojan horse” programs to our users’ computers. These
emails appear to be legitimate emails sent by eBay, PayPal, Skype, or a user of one of those businesses, but direct
recipients to fake websites operated by the sender of the email or request that the recipient send a password or other
confidential information via email or download a program. Despite our efforts to mitigate “spoof” and “phishing”
emails through product improvements and user education, “spoof” and “phishing” remain a serious problem that
may damage our brands, discourage use of our websites, and increase our costs.

Changes in regulations or user concerns regarding privacy and protection of user data could adversely
affect our business.

We are subject to laws relating to the collection, use, retention, security and transfer of personally identifiable
information about our users, especially for financial information and for users located outside of the U.S. In many
cases, these laws apply not only to third-party transactions but also to transfers of information between ourselves
and our subsidiaries, and between ourselves, our subsidiaries, and other parties with which we have commercial
relations. New laws in this area have been passed by several jurisdictions, and other jurisdictions are considering
imposing additional restrictions. The interpretation and application of user data protection laws are in a state of flux.
These laws may be interpreted and applied inconsistently from country to country and our current data protection
policies and practices may not be consistent with those interpretations and applications. Complying with these
varying international requirements could cause us to incur substantial costs or require us to change our business
practices in a manner adverse to our business. In addition, we have and post on our websites our own privacy
policies and practices concerning the collection, use and disclosure of user data. Any failure, or perceived failure, by
us to comply with our posted privacy policies or with any regulatory requirements or orders or other federal, state or
international privacy or consumer protection-related laws and regulations could result in proceedings or actions
against us by governmental entities or others, subject us to significant penalties and negative publicity and adversely
affect us. In addition, as noted above, we are subject to the possibility of security breaches, which themselves may
result in a violation of these laws.

Our revenue from advertising is subject to factors beyond our control.

We derive an increasing portion of our revenues from advertising on our websites. Revenues from online
advertising are sensitive to events and trends that affect advertising expenditures, such as general changes in the

21

economy and changes in consumer spending, as well as the effectiveness of online advertising versus offline
advertising media and the value our websites provide to advertisers relative to other websites. In addition, major
search engine operators have the ability to change from time to time, at their sole discretion, the rules and search
algorithms governing the pricing, availability, and placement of online advertising. Any changes in these rules or
search algorithms could materially reduce the value that we derive from online advertising on our websites, either
directly or indirectly. For example, retailers pay a fee to Shopping.com for online shoppers directed to their websites
by Shopping.com. Rule changes made by search engines in 2008 disrupted traffic to our Shopping.com website,
which in turn has adversely affected click-through traffic to retailers from our Shopping.com website and associated
fee revenue. If we experience a reduction in our advertising revenues due to economic, competitive, technological
or other factors, including a reduction in consumer spending due to the current recession in the U.S. and worldwide
economic slowdown or if we are unable to provide value to our advertisers, our business and financial results would
suffer.

Our growth will depend on our ability to develop our brands, and these efforts may be costly.

We believe that continuing to strengthen our brands will be critical to achieving widespread acceptance of our
services, and will require a continued focus on active marketing efforts across all of our brands. The demand for and
cost of online and traditional advertising have been increasing, and may continue to increase. Accordingly, we will
need to continue to spend substantial amounts of money on, and devote substantial resources to, advertising,
marketing, and other efforts to create and maintain brand loyalty among users. Since 2004, we have significantly
increased the number of brands we are supporting, adding Rent.com, Shopping.com, our classified websites (e.g.,
Kijiji and Marktplaats), StubHub, Skype and Bill Me Later, among others. Each of these brands requires its own
resources, increasing the costs of our branding efforts. Brand promotion activities may not yield increased revenues,
and even if they do, any increased revenues may not offset the expenses incurred in building our brands. Also, major
search engine operators that we use to advertise our brands have frequently-changing rules that govern their pricing,
availability and placement of online advertisement (e.g., paid search, keywords), and changes to these rules could
negatively affect our use of online advertising to promote our brands. If we fail to promote and maintain our brands,
or if we incur substantial expenses in an unsuccessful attempt to promote and maintain our brands, our business
would be harmed.

New and existing regulations could harm our business.

We are subject to the same foreign and domestic laws as other companies conducting business on and off the
Internet. It is not always clear how existing laws governing issues such as property ownership, copyrights,
trademarks and other intellectual property issues, parallel imports and distribution controls, taxation, libel and
defamation, obscenity, and personal privacy apply to online businesses such as ours. The majority of these laws
were adopted prior to the advent of the Internet and related technologies and, as a result, do not contemplate or
address the unique issues of the Internet and related technologies. Those laws that do reference the Internet, such as
the U.S. Digital Millennium Copyright Act and the European Union’s Directive on Distance Selling and Electronic
Commerce, are being interpreted by the courts, but their applicability and scope remain uncertain. Furthermore, as
our activities and the types of goods and services listed on our websites expand, including through acquisitions such
as our acquisition of Bill Me Later, a transactional credit provider, in November 2008 and StubHub, an online ticket
marketplace, in February 2007, regulatory agencies or courts may claim or hold that we or our users are subject to
licensure or prohibited from conducting our business in their jurisdiction, either generally or with respect to certain
actions (e.g., the sale of real estate, event tickets, cultural goods, boats and automobiles).

Our success and increased visibility has driven some existing businesses that perceive our business model to be
a threat to their business to raise concerns about our business models to policymakers and regulators, particularly in
the U.S. and Europe. These established businesses and their trade association groups employ significant resources
in their efforts to shape the legal and regulatory regimes in countries where we have significant operations. They
may employ these resources in an effort to change the legal and regulatory regimes in ways intended to reduce the
effectiveness of our businesses and the ability of users to use our products and services. In particular, these
established businesses have raised concerns relating to pricing, parallel imports, professional seller obligations,
stolen goods, copyrights, trademarks and other intellectual property rights, and the liability of the provider of an

22

Internet marketplace for the conduct of its users related to those and other issues. Success in changing the legal or
regulatory regimes in a manner that would increase our liability for third-party listings could negatively impact our
business.

Over the last few years some large retailers and their trade associations have sought legislation in a number of
states and the U.S. Congress that would make eBay liable for the sale of stolen property or would ban certain
categories of goods from sale on our platform, including gift cards and health and beauty products. No such
legislation has passed. Nonetheless, the proponents continue to seek passage of such legislation, and if any of these
laws are adopted it could harm our business.

Numerous states and foreign jurisdictions, including the State of California, where our headquarters are
located, have regulations regarding “auctions” and the handling of property by “secondhand dealers” or
“pawnbrokers.” Several states and some foreign jurisdictions, including France, have attempted, and may attempt
in the future, to impose such regulations upon us or our users. Attempted enforcement of these laws against some of
our users appears to be increasing and such attempted enforcements could harm our business. In France, we have
been sued by Conseil des Ventes, the French auction regulatory authority. The agency alleges that sales on our
French website constitute illegal auctions that cannot be performed without its consent. A lawsuit alleging similar
claims has been brought against us by two associations of French antique dealers. We intend to vigorously defend
against these lawsuits. However, this and other regulatory and licensure claims could result in costly litigation and,
if successful, could require us to change the way we or our users do business in ways that increase costs or reduce
revenues (for example, by forcing us to prohibit listings of certain items for some locations). We could also be
subject to fines or other penalties, and any of these outcomes could harm our business.

A number of the lawsuits against us relating to trademark issues seek to have our websites subject to
unfavorable local laws. For example, “trademark exhaustion” principles provide trademark owners with certain
rights to control the sale of a branded authentic product until it has been placed on the market by the trademark
holder or with the holder’s consent. The application of “trademark exhaustion” principles is largely unsettled in the
context of the Internet, and if trademark owners are able to force us to prohibit listings of certain items in one or
more locations, our business could be harmed.

As we expand and localize our international activities, we become obligated to comply with the laws of the
countries in which we operate. In addition, because our services are accessible worldwide, and we facilitate sales of
goods to users worldwide, one or more jurisdictions may claim that we or our users are required to comply with their
laws based on the location of our servers or one or more of our users, or the location of the product or service being sold
or provided in an ecommerce transaction. For example, we were found liable in France, under French law in the recent
Louis Vuitton Malletier litigation for transactions on our websites worldwide that did not involve French buyers and
sellers. Laws regulating Internet and ecommerce companies outside of the U.S. may be less favorable than those in the
U.S., giving greater rights to consumers, content owners, competitors, users and other third parties. Compliance may
be more costly or may require us to change our business practices or restrict our service offerings, and the imposition
of any regulations on our users may harm our business. In addition, we may be subject to overlapping legal or
regulatory regimes that impose conflicting requirements on us. Our alleged failure to comply with foreign laws could
subject us to penalties ranging from criminal prosecution to significant fines to bans on our services.

If our Payments business is found to be subject to or in violation of any laws or regulations, including
those governing money transmission, electronic funds transfers, money laundering, banking and lending,
it could be subject to liability, licensure and regulatory approval and may be forced to change its business
practices.

To date, PayPal has obtained licenses to operate as a money transmitter in 42 U.S. states and territories and
interpretations in seven states that licensing is not required under their existing statutes. The remaining U.S. states
and territories do not currently regulate money transmitters. As a licensed money transmitter, PayPal is subject to
restrictions on its investment of customer funds, reporting requirements, bonding requirements, and inspection by
state regulatory agencies. If PayPal were found to be in violation of money services laws or regulations, PayPal
could be subject to liability, forced to cease doing business with residents of certain states, forced to change its
business practices, or required to obtain additional licenses or regulatory approvals that could impose a substantial

23

cost on PayPal. Any change to PayPal’s business practices that makes the service less attractive to customers or
prohibits its use by residents of a particular jurisdiction could decrease the velocity of trade on eBay, which would
further harm our business.

Although there have been no definitive interpretations to date, PayPal has assumed that its service is subject to
the Electronic Fund Transfer Act and Regulation E of the Federal Reserve Board. As a result, among other things,
PayPal must provide advance disclosure of changes to its service, follow specified error resolution procedures and
reimburse consumers for losses above $50 from transactions not authorized by the consumer. PayPal currently
voluntarily reimburses consumers for all financial losses from transactions not authorized by the consumer, not just
losses above $50. PayPal seeks to pass most of these losses on to the relevant merchants, but PayPal incurs losses if
the merchant does not have sufficient funds in its PayPal account.

PayPal is also subject to anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing laws and regulations that
prohibit, among other things, its involvement in transferring the proceeds of criminal activities. Although PayPal
has adopted a program to comply with these laws and regulations, any errors or failure to implement the program
properly could lead to lawsuits, administrative action, and prosecution by the government. PayPal is also subject to
regulations that require it to report suspicious activities involving transactions of $2,000 or more and may be
required to obtain and keep more detailed records on the senders and recipients in certain transfers of $3,000 or
more. The interpretation of suspicious activities in this context is uncertain. Future regulations under the USA
PATRIOT Act may require PayPal to revise the procedures it uses to verify the identity of its customers and to
monitor international transactions more closely. As PayPal localizes its service in other countries, additional
verification and reporting requirements may apply, which in some cases are more stringent. Several countries,
including Australia, Canada, Luxembourg and Singapore, have implemented or are in the process of implementing
new anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing laws and regulations, and the impact of these laws and
regulations on PayPal’s business is uncertain. PayPal could be required, among other things, to learn more about its
customers before opening an account, to obtain additional verification of customers and to monitor its customers’
activities more closely. These requirements could impose significant costs on PayPal, make it more difficult for new
customers to join its network and reduce the attractiveness of its product. Failure to comply with federal, state or
foreign money laundering and counter-terrorist financing laws could result in significant criminal and civil lawsuits,
penalties, and forfeiture of significant assets.

While PayPal currently allows its customers with credit cards to send payments from 190 markets, only 65 of
those markets (including the U.S.) allow its customers to receive payments, in some cases with significant
restrictions on the manner in which customers can withdraw funds. These limitations may affect PayPal’s ability to
grow in these markets.

Of the 190 markets whose residents can use the PayPal service, 31 (27 countries plus four French overseas
departments) are members of the European Union (EU). Since 2007, PayPal has provided localized versions of its
service to customers in the EU through PayPal (Europe) S.A.R.L. et Cie, SCA., a wholly-owned subsidiary of
PayPal that is licensed as a bank in Luxembourg. Accordingly, PayPal (Europe) is subject to significant fines or
other enforcement action if it violates the disclosure, reporting, anti-money laundering, capitalization, funds
management, corporate governance or other requirements imposed on Luxembourg banks. PayPal has limited
experience in operating as a bank, and any fines or other enforcement actions imposed by the Luxembourg regulator
could adversely affect PayPal’s business. PayPal (Europe) implements its localized services in EU countries
through an expedited “passport” notification process through the Luxembourg regulator to regulators in other EU
member states pursuant to EU Directives, and has completed the “passport” notice process in all EU member
countries. The regulators in these countries could notify PayPal (Europe) of local consumer protection laws that will
apply to its business, in addition to Luxembourg consumer protection law, and could also seek to persuade the
Luxembourg regulator to order PayPal (Europe) to conduct its activities in the local country through a branch office.
Any such responses from these regulators could increase the cost of, or delay, PayPal’s plans for expanding its
business.

In markets other than the U.S., EU, Australia and China, PayPal serves its customers through PayPal Private
Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of PayPal that is based in Singapore. In many of these markets, it is not clear
whether PayPal’s Singapore-based service is subject to Singaporean law or, if it is subject to local laws, whether

24

such local law requires a payment processor like PayPal to be licensed as a bank or financial institution or otherwise.
Even if PayPal is not currently required to obtain a license in some jurisdictions, future localization or targeted
marketing of PayPal’s service in those countries, or expansion of the financial products offered by PayPal to new
jurisdictions (either alone, through a commercial alliance or through an acquisition), could subject PayPal to
additional licensure requirements, laws and regulations and increased regulatory scrutiny. These factors could
impose substantial costs and involve considerable delay to the provision or development of its products. Delay or
failure to receive such a license or regulatory approval could require PayPal to change its business practices or
features in ways that would adversely affect PayPal’s international expansion plans and could require PayPal to
suspend providing products and services to customers in one or more countries.

Our Bill Me Later service is similarly subject to a variety of laws and regulations. Although Bill Me Later does
not originate loans, one or more jurisdictions may conclude that Bill Me Later is a lender or money transmitter or
loan broker, which could subject us to liability or regulation in one or more jurisdictions. Additionally, federal
regulators could mandate changes to the relationship between Bill Me Later and CIT Bank, the financial institution
that Bill Me Later relies on to extend credit to customers with the Bill Me Later service. Any adverse changes in this
relationship could negatively impact Bill Me Later’s ability to continue operating its business as currently
conducted.

Changes to credit card networks or bank fees, rules, or practices could harm PayPal’s business.

PayPal does not belong to or directly access credit card networks, such as Visa and MasterCard. As a result,
PayPal must rely on banks or other payment processors to process transactions, and must pay a fee for this service.
From time to time, credit card networks have increased, and may increase in the future, the interchange fees and
assessments that they charge for each transaction using one of their cards. PayPal’s credit card processors have the
right to pass any increases in interchange fees and assessments on to PayPal as well as increase their own fees for
processing. These increased fees increase PayPal’s operating costs and reduce its profit margins. PayPal is also
required by its processors to comply with credit card network operating rules, and PayPal has agreed to reimburse its
processors for any fines they are assessed by credit card networks as a result of any rule violations by PayPal or
PayPal’s customers. The credit card networks set and interpret the credit card rules. Credit card networks could
adopt new operating rules or re-interpret existing rules that PayPal or its processors might find difficult or even
impossible to follow. As a result, PayPal could lose its ability to give customers the option of using credit cards to
fund their payments. If PayPal were unable to accept credit cards, its business would be seriously damaged. In
addition, the velocity of trade on eBay could decrease and our business would further suffer.

PayPal is required to comply with credit card networks’ special operating rules for Internet payment services.
PayPal and its credit card processors have implemented specific business processes for merchant customers in order
to comply with these rules, but any failure to comply could result in fines, the amount of which would be within the
credit card networks’ discretion. PayPal also could be subject to fines from credit card networks if it fails to detect
that merchants are engaging in activities that are illegal or that are considered “high risk,” primarily the sale of
certain types of digital content. For “high risk” merchants, PayPal must either prevent such merchants from using
PayPal or register such merchants with credit card networks and conduct additional monitoring with respect to such
merchants. PayPal has incurred fines from its credit card processor relating to PayPal’s failure to detect the use of its
service by “high risk” merchants. The amount of these fines has not been material, but any additional fines in the
future would likely be for larger amounts, could become material, and could result in a termination of PayPal’s
ability to accept credit cards or changes in PayPal’s process for registering new customers, which would seriously
damage PayPal’s business.

Changes in PayPal’s funding mix could adversely affect PayPal’s results.

PayPal pays significant transaction fees when senders fund payment transactions using credit cards, nominal
fees when customers fund payment transactions by electronic transfer of funds from bank accounts, and no fees
when customers fund payment transactions from an existing PayPal account balance or use buyer credit issued by
GE Money Bank. Senders fund a significant portion of PayPal’s payment volume using credit cards, and PayPal’s
financial success will remain highly sensitive to changes in the rate at which its senders fund payments using credit
cards. Senders may prefer funding using credit cards rather than bank account transfers for a number of reasons,

25

including the ability to dispute and reverse charges directly with their credit card provider if merchandise is not
delivered or is not as described, the ability to earn frequent flier miles or other incentives offered by credit card
issuers, the ability to defer payment, or a reluctance to provide bank account information to PayPal. The proportion
of PayPal’s payment volume funded using credit cards has increased over time. In addition, some of PayPal’s newer
offerings, including the ability to make a limited number of payments without opening an account, have a higher
rate of credit card funding than PayPal’s basic product offering. In September 2006, PayPal entered into a settlement
agreement with the attorneys general of a number of states under which it agreed to pay $1.7 million to the attorneys
general, shorten and streamline its user agreement, and communicate more information regarding protection
programs to users. Also in September 2006, PayPal announced that it had reached a preliminary settlement
agreement under which it agreed to pay approximately $3.5 million into a settlement fund for the benefit of a class
represented by plaintiffs in a suit that alleged, among other things, that PayPal’s disclosure regarding the effects of
users’ choice of funding mechanism was deceptive. This settlement has now been approved by the court. Although
PayPal did not admit any liability for any of the allegations in the two cases, changes to our disclosure practices
could result in increased use of credit card funding, which could harm PayPal’s business.

PayPal’s failure to manage customer funds properly would harm its business.

PayPal’s ability to manage and account accurately for customer funds requires a high level of internal controls.
In some of the markets that PayPal serves and currencies that PayPal offers, PayPal has a limited operating history
and limited management experience in managing these internal controls. As PayPal’s business continues to grow, it
must strengthen its internal controls accordingly. PayPal’s success requires significant public confidence in its
ability to handle large and growing transaction volumes and amounts of customer funds. Any failure to maintain
necessary controls or to manage accurately customer funds could diminish customer use of PayPal’s product
severely.

System failures could harm our business.

We have experienced system failures from time to time, and any interruption in the availability of our websites
will reduce our current revenues and profits, could harm our future revenues and profits, and could subject us to
regulatory scrutiny. Our eBay.com website has been interrupted for periods of up to 22 hours, and our PayPal
website has suffered intermittent unavailability for periods as long as five days. In August 2007, Skype experienced
an interruption during which the majority of Skype’s users were unable to use its products for approximately two
days. Any unscheduled interruption in our services results in an immediate, and possibly substantial, loss of
revenues. Frequent or persistent interruptions in our services could cause current or potential users to believe that
our systems are unreliable, leading them to switch to our competitors or to avoid our sites, and could permanently
harm our reputation and brands. Reliability is particularly critical for PayPal, especially as it seeks to expand its
Merchant Services business. Because PayPal is a regulated financial entity, frequent or persistent site interruptions
could lead to fines, penalties, or mandatory changes to PayPal’s business practices, and ultimately could cause
PayPal to lose existing licenses it needs to operate or prevent it from obtaining additional licenses that it needs to
expand. Finally, because our customers may use our products for critical transactions, any system failures could
result in damage to our customers’ businesses. These customers could seek significant compensation from us for
their losses. Even if unsuccessful, this type of claim likely would be time consuming and costly for us to address.

Although our systems have been designed around industry-standard architectures to reduce downtime in the
event of outages or catastrophic occurrences, they remain vulnerable to damage or interruption from earthquakes,
floods, fires, power loss, telecommunication failures, terrorist attacks, computer viruses, computer denial-of-
service attacks, and similar events. Some of our systems, including our Shopping.com and Skype websites and the
systems related to the Bill Me Later business, are not fully redundant, and our disaster recovery planning is not
sufficient for all eventualities. Our systems are also subject to break-ins, sabotage, and intentional acts of vandalism.
Despite any precautions we may take, the occurrence of a natural disaster, a decision by any of our third-party
hosting providers to close a facility we use without adequate notice for financial or other reasons, or other
unanticipated problems at our hosting facilities could result in lengthy interruptions in our services. We do not carry
business interruption insurance sufficient to compensate us for losses that may result from interruptions in our
service as a result of system failures.

26

There are many risks associated with our international operations.

Our international expansion has been rapid and our international business, especially in Germany and the U.K.,
has also become critical to our revenues and profits. Net revenues outside the U.S. accounted for approximately
51% and 54%, respectively, of our net revenues in fiscal years 2007 and 2008. Expansion into international markets
requires management attention and resources and requires us to localize our services to conform to local cultures,
standards, and policies. The commercial, Internet, and transportation infrastructure in lesser-developed countries
may make it more difficult for us to replicate our traditional Marketplace business model. In many countries, we
compete with local companies that understand the local market better than we do, and we may not benefit from first-
to-market advantages. We may not be successful in expanding into particular international markets or in generating
revenues from foreign operations. For example, in 2002 we withdrew our eBay marketplace offering from the
Japanese market, and in 2007 we contributed our business in China to a joint venture with a local Chinese company.
Even if we are successful in developing new markets, we often expect the costs of operating new sites to exceed our
net revenues for at least 12 months in most countries.

As we continue to expand internationally, including through the expansion of PayPal, Skype, Shopping.com,
and our classified businesses, we are increasingly subject to risks of doing business internationally, including the
following:

(cid:129) strong local competitors;

(cid:129) regulatory requirements, including regulation of Internet services, communications, auctioneering, profes-
sional selling, distance selling, privacy and data protection, banking, and money transmitting, that may limit
or prevent the offering of our services in some jurisdictions, prevent enforceable agreements between sellers
and buyers, prohibit the listing of certain categories of goods, require product changes, require special
licensure, subject us to various taxes, penalties or audits, or limit the transfer of information between us and
our affiliates;

(cid:129) greater liability or legal uncertainty regarding our liability for the listings and other content provided by our
users, including uncertainty as a result of legal systems that are less developed with respect to the Internet,
unique local laws, conflicting court decisions and lack of clear precedent or applicable law;

(cid:129) cultural ambivalence towards, or non-acceptance of, online trading;

(cid:129) laws and business practices that favor local competitors or prohibit foreign ownership of certain businesses;

(cid:129) difficulties in integrating with local payment providers, including banks, credit and debit card networks, and

electronic fund transfer systems or with the local telecommunications infrastructure;

(cid:129) differing levels of retail distribution, shipping, communications, and Internet infrastructures;

(cid:129) different employee/employer relationships and the existence of workers’ councils and labor unions;

(cid:129) difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations;

(cid:129) challenges associated with joint venture relationships, including dependence on our joint venture partners;

(cid:129) difficulties in implementing and maintaining adequate internal controls;

(cid:129) longer payment cycles, different accounting practices, and greater problems in collecting accounts

receivable;

(cid:129) potentially adverse tax consequences, including local taxation of our fees or of transactions on our websites;

(cid:129) higher telecommunications and Internet service provider costs;

(cid:129) different and more stringent user protection, data protection, privacy and other laws;

(cid:129) seasonal reductions in business activity;

(cid:129) expenses associated with localizing our products, including offering customers the ability to transact

business in the local currency;

27

(cid:129) profit repatriation restrictions, foreign currency exchange restrictions, and exchange rate fluctuations;

(cid:129) volatility in a specific country’s or region’s political, economic or military conditions; and

(cid:129) differing intellectual property laws.

Some of these factors may cause our international costs of doing business to exceed our comparable domestic
costs. As we expand our international operations and have additional portions of our international revenues
denominated in foreign currencies, we also could become subject to increased difficulties in collecting accounts
receivable, repatriating money without adverse tax consequences, and risks relating to foreign currency exchange
rate fluctuations. The impact of currency exchange rate fluctuations is discussed in more detail under “We are
exposed to fluctuations in currency exchange rates and interest rates,” above.

In addition, we conduct certain functions, including product development, customer support and other
operations, in regions outside the U.S., particularly in India and China. We are subject to both U.S. and local
laws and regulations applicable to our offshore activities, and any factors which reduce the anticipated benefits,
including cost efficiencies and productivity improvements, associated with providing these functions outside of the
U.S. could adversely affect our business.

We are continuing to expand PayPal’s services internationally. In some countries, expansion of PayPal’s
business may require a close commercial relationship with one or more local banks, a shared ownership interest
with a local entity or registration as a bank under local law. Such requirements may reduce our profitability or limit
the scope of our activities in particular countries. Any limitation on our ability to expand PayPal internationally
could harm our business.

We maintain a portion of Shopping.com’s research and development facilities and personnel in Israel, and in
January 2008 we acquired Fraud Sciences Ltd., an Israeli company. As a result, political, economic and military
conditions in Israel affect those operations. The future of peace efforts between Israel and its neighboring countries
remains uncertain. Increased hostilities or terrorism within Israel or armed hostilities between Israel and neigh-
boring states could make it more difficult for us to continue our operations in Israel, which could increase our costs.
In addition, many of our employees in Israel could be required to serve in the military for extended periods of time
under emergency circumstances. Our Israeli operations could be disrupted by the absence of employees due to
military service, which could adversely affect our business.

Acquisitions and joint ventures could result in operating difficulties, dilution, and other harmful
consequences.

We have acquired a number of businesses in the past, including, most recently, Bill Me Later, Inc. in the
United States and Den Bla˚ Avis and BilBasen, classified businesses in Denmark. We expect to continue to evaluate
and consider a wide array of potential strategic transactions, including business combinations, acquisitions and
dispositions of businesses, technologies, services, products and other assets. At any given time we may be engaged
in discussions or negotiations with respect to one or more of these types of transactions. Any of these transactions
could be material to our financial condition and results of operations. The process of integrating any acquired
business may create unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures and is itself risky. The areas where we may
face difficulties include:

(cid:129) diversion of management time, as well as a shift of focus from operating the businesses to issues related to
integration and administration, particularly given the large number and size and varying scope of our recent
acquisitions;

(cid:129) declining employee morale and retention issues resulting from changes in, or acceleration of, compensation,
or changes in management, reporting relationships, future prospects, or the direction of the business;

(cid:129) the need to integrate each company’s accounting, management, information, human resource and other
administrative systems to permit effective management, and the lack of control if such integration is delayed
or not implemented;

28

(cid:129) the need to implement controls, procedures and policies appropriate for a larger public company at

companies that prior to acquisition had lacked such controls, procedures and policies;

(cid:129) in the case of foreign acquisitions, the need to integrate operations across different cultures and languages
and to address the particular economic, currency, political, and regulatory risks associated with specific
countries;

(cid:129) in some cases, the need to transition operations, users, and customers onto our existing platforms; and

(cid:129) liability for activities of the acquired company before the acquisition, including violations of laws, rules and

regulations, commercial disputes, tax liabilities and other known and unknown liabilities.

Moreover, we may not realize the anticipated benefits of any or all of our acquisitions, or may not realize them
in the time frame expected. For example, in connection with the Skype transaction, we recorded a goodwill
impairment charge of approximately $1.4 billion in our financial statements during 2007. Future acquisitions or
mergers may require us to issue additional equity securities, spend our cash, or incur debt, liabilities, amortization
expenses related to intangible assets or write-offs of goodwill, any of which could reduce our profitability and harm
our business.

In addition, we have made certain investments, including through joint ventures, in which we have a minority
equity interest and lack management and operational control. These investments may involve risks. For example,
the controlling joint venture partner in a joint venture investment may have business interests, strategies or goals
that are inconsistent with ours, and business decisions or other actions or omissions of the controlling joint venture
partner or the joint venture company may result in harm to our reputation or adversely affect the value of our
investment in the joint venture.

Bill Me Later will expose us to new risks.

We acquired Bill Me Later, a company that provides transaction-based credit, in late 2008. Upon acquiring Bill

Me Later, we became exposed to new risks.

Bill Me Later is not a chartered financial institution, and relies on CIT Bank to extend credit to Bill Me Later
customers in order to offer the Bill Me Later service. When a consumer makes a purchase using the Bill Me Later
service, CIT Bank funds the consumer loan at the point of sale and advances funds to the merchant, and Bill Me
Later subsequently purchases the receivable related to the consumer loan extended by CIT Bank. Although CIT
Bank continues to own each customer account, Bill Me Later owns the related receivable and is responsible for all
servicing functions related to the account. Any termination or interruption of CIT Bank’s services to us, including
due to the suspension or termination of CIT Bank’s banking charter, a regulatory challenge to the relationship
between CIT Bank and Bill Me Later or the termination of our commercial relationship with CIT Bank for any
reason, could materially and adversely affect our ability to offer the Bill Me Later service. Under those circum-
stances, we would likely be required to either reach a similar arrangement with another chartered financial
institution, which may not be available on favorable terms, if at all, or to obtain our own bank charter, which would
be a time-consuming and costly process and would subject us to a number of additional laws and regulations. Bill
Me Later also relies on third-party merchant processors and payment gateways to process transactions using the Bill
Me Later service. Most of the transaction volume by dollar amount through the Bill Me Later service is currently
settled through the facilities of a single vendor. Any disruption to our payment processing and gateway services
would adversely affect the Bill Me Later service.

We currently fund the origination of receivables related to Bill Me Later accounts through free cash flow
generated from our portfolio of businesses and from our existing line of credit. As a result of the bankruptcy of
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., our available line of credit was effectively reduced by Lehman Brothers
Commercial Bank’s $160 million commitment. If other financial institutions that have extended credit commit-
ments to us are adversely affected by U.S. and global economic conditions, they may become unable to fund
borrowings under their credit commitments to us. Our ability to securitize receivables related to Bill Me Later
accounts is dependent upon, among other things, conditions in the structured finance markets, which have been
subject to recent disruptions in the credit industry, resulting in very limited liquidity for securitization purposes. If

29

we are unable to fund receivables related to the Bill Me Later business in a cost-effective manner, the growth and
profitability of the Bill Me Later business could be significantly and adversely affected.

The Bill Me Later service is offered to a wide range of consumers, and the profitability of this business depends
on our ability to manage credit risk while attracting new consumers with profitable usage patterns. Bill Me Later
approves loans using proprietary segmentation and credit scoring algorithms and other analytical techniques
designed to analyze the credit risk of the specific transaction. These algorithms and techniques may not accurately
predict the creditworthiness of a consumer due to, among other factors, inaccurate assumptions about a particular
consumer or the economic environment. Bill Me Later may also incorrectly interpret the data produced by these
algorithms in setting its credit policies. Bill Me Later’s ability to manage credit risk may also be adversely affected
by economic conditions, legal or regulatory changes (such as bankruptcy laws and minimum payment regulations),
competitors’ actions and consumer behavior and other factors. In addition, the credit crisis and current recession in
the U.S. may affect consumer confidence levels and reduce consumers’ ability or willingness to use credit,
including our transaction-based credit product, which could impair the growth of the Bill Me Later business.

As of December 31, 2008, Bill Me Later had an aggregate consumer loan portfolio of approximately
$597.6 million. Like other businesses with significant exposure to losses from consumer loans, the Bill Me Later
service faces the risk that account holders will default on their payment obligations, resulting in accounts becoming
uncollectible, and the risk of potential charge-offs related to the loan portfolio. The nonpayment rate among Bill Me
Later users may increase due to, among other things, worsening economic conditions, such as the current recession
in the U.S., and higher unemployment rates. Consumers who miss payments on their loans often fail to repay them,
and consumers who file for protection under the bankruptcy laws generally do not repay their loans. The age and
rate of growth of a consumer loan portfolio also affects the rate of missed payments and loans charged off as
uncollectible. Consumers are less likely to miss their payments within the first 12 to 18 months of a loan’s term.
When a lender makes fewer loans than it has in the past, the proportion of new loans in its portfolio will decrease and
the rate of missed payments and charge-offs in the portfolio will increase.

In addition, Bill Me Later faces other risks similar to those faced by PayPal, including the risk of systems
failures, security breaches or other loss of customer data, fraud, intellectual property claims, compliance failures,
and changes to regulations relating to credit offerings described in these Risk Factors, including under the captions
“Government inquiries may lead to charges or penalties” and “If our Payments business is found to be subject to or
in violation of any laws or regulations, including those governing money transmission, electronic funds transfer,
money laundering, banking and lending, it could be subject to liability, licensure and regulatory approval and may
be forced to change its business practices.”

Our business and users may be subject to sales tax and other taxes.

The application of indirect taxes (such as sales and use tax, value-added tax, or VAT, goods and services tax,
business tax, and gross receipt tax) to ecommerce businesses such as eBay and to our users is a complex and
evolving issue. Many of the fundamental statutes and regulations that impose these taxes were established before
the growth of the Internet and ecommerce. In many cases, it is not clear how existing statutes apply to the Internet or
electronic commerce or communications conducted over the Internet. In addition, some jurisdictions have
implemented or may implement laws specifically addressing the Internet or some aspect of electronic commerce
or communications on the Internet. For example, the State of New York recently passed new legislation that requires
any out-of-state seller of tangible personal property to collect and remit New York use tax if the seller engages
affiliates in New York to perform certain business promotion activities. Several ecommerce companies are
challenging this new law, which was recently upheld by a lower level New York court. While this new law does
not specifically apply to our businesses it may adversely affect our sellers and indirectly harm our business.

From time to time, some taxing authorities have notified us that they believe we owe them certain taxes. In May
2008, the City of Chicago notified both eBay and StubHub that they are liable for a city amusement tax on tickets to
events in Chicago, irrespective of the location of the buyer or seller, and has filed suit to enforce collection of taxes
they claim are due. The application of similar existing or future laws could have adverse effects on our business.

Several proposals have been made at the U.S. state and local level that would impose additional taxes on the
sale of goods and services or communications through the Internet. These proposals, if adopted, could substantially

30

impair the growth of ecommerce and our brands, and could diminish our opportunity to derive financial benefit from
our activities. The U.S. federal government’s moratorium on state and local taxation of Internet access or multiple or
discriminatory taxes on ecommerce was extended through November 2014. This moratorium does not prohibit
federal, state, or local authorities from collecting taxes on our income or from collecting certain taxes that were in
effect prior to the enactment of the moratorium and/or one of its extensions.

In conjunction with the Streamlined Sales Tax Project — an ongoing, multi-year effort by U.S., state, and local
governments to require collection and remittance of distant sales tax by out-of-state sellers — bills have been
introduced in recent years in the U.S. Congress to overturn the Supreme Court’s Quill decision, which limits the
ability of state governments to require sellers outside of their own state to collect and remit sales taxes on goods
purchased by in-state residents. Such legislation may be considered by the U.S. Congress as a way to enable states to
increase sales tax revenues and help address significant state budget difficulties caused by the economic downturn.
The adoption of any legislation overturning the Quill decision that lacks a robust small business exemption would
harm our users and our business.

We do not collect taxes on the goods or services sold by users of our services. One or more states or the federal
government or foreign countries may seek to impose a tax collection, reporting or record-keeping obligation on
companies that engage in or facilitate ecommerce. Such an obligation could be imposed by legislation intended to
improve tax compliance (and legislation to such effect has been discussed in the U.S. Congress, several states, and a
number of foreign jurisdictions) or if an eBay company was ever deemed to be the legal agent of the users of our
services by a jurisdiction in which eBay operates. In July 2008, the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008
(H.R. 3221) was signed into law. This law contains provisions that require companies like PayPal to report to the
IRS information on payments received by some of our customers. The legislation, effective for payments received
after December 31, 2010, will require PayPal and similar companies to report to the IRS U.S.-based customers who
receive more than $20,000 in payments and more than 200 payments in a year. This law will require PayPal to
request tax ID numbers from U.S. users and track payments by tax ID number. This requirement may decrease seller
activity and harm our business. One or more other jurisdictions may also seek to impose tax-collection or reporting
obligations based on the location of the product or service being sold or provided in an ecommerce transaction,
regardless of where the respective users are located. Imposition of a discriminatory record keeping or tax collecting
requirement could decrease seller activity on our sites and would harm our business. Foreign authorities may also
require eBay to help ensure compliance by our users with local laws regulating professional sellers, including tax
requirements. In addition, we have periodically received requests from tax authorities in many jurisdictions for
information regarding the transactions of large classes of sellers on our sites, and in some cases we have been legally
obligated to provide this data. The imposition of any requirements on us to disclose transaction records for all or a
class of sellers to tax or other regulatory authorities or to file tax forms on behalf of any sellers, especially
requirements that are imposed on us but not on alternative means of ecommerce, and any use of those records to
investigate, collect taxes from, or prosecute sellers, could decrease seller activity on our sites and harm our business.

We pay input VAT on applicable taxable purchases within the various countries in which we operate. In most
cases, we are entitled to reclaim this input VAT from the various countries. However, because of our unique business
model, the application of the laws and rules that allow such reclamation is sometimes uncertain. A successful
assertion by one or more countries that we are not entitled to reclaim VAT could harm our business.

We continue to work with the relevant tax authorities and legislators to clarify eBay’s obligations under new
and emerging laws and regulations. Passage of new legislation and the imposition of additional tax or tax-related
reporting requirements could harm our users and our business. There have been, and will continue to be, substantial
ongoing costs associated with complying with the various indirect tax requirements in the numerous markets in
which eBay conducts or will conduct business.

The current regulatory environment for Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) is uncertain, and Skype’s
business could be harmed by new regulations or the application of existing regulations to its products.

The current regulatory environment for VoIP is uncertain and rapidly changing. Skype believes that its Internet
communications products are currently subject to few, if any, of the same regulations that apply to traditional
telephony and VoIP-based telephone replacement services. VoIP companies are generally subject to different

31

regulatory regimes in different countries, and in most cases are subject to lower, or no, regulatory fees and lesser, or
no, specific regulatory requirements. However, the status of VoIP providers is uncertain in many jurisdictions and
Skype frequently must respond to inquiries about its regulatory status. Regulatory agencies may require Skype to
conform to rules that are difficult or impossible for it to comply with due to the nature of its communications
technologies, which could adversely affect its business. For example, while suitable alternatives may be developed
in the future, Skype is currently unable to identify the exact geographic origin of the traffic traversing the Internet or
to provide detailed calling information about computer-to- computer communications, either of which may make
complying with future regulatory requirements, such as emergency service requirements, difficult or impossible.

Governments may impose new or increased fees, taxes, and administrative burdens on VoIP companies, or
Skype may change its product offerings in a manner that subjects it to telecommunications regulations. Increased
fees could include access and other charges payable to local exchange carriers to carry and terminate traffic,
contributions to federal or state Universal Service Funds in the United States and elsewhere, and other charges. In
addition, such fees may be assessed by governments retroactively or prospectively. Skype may be required to meet
various emergency service requirements, disability access requirements, user protection requirements, number
assignment and portability requirements, and interception or wiretapping requirements, such as the Communi-
cations Assistance for Law Enforcement Act in the U.S. and similar laws in other jurisdictions. Such regulations
could result in substantial costs depending on the technical changes required to accommodate the requirements, and
any increased costs could erode Skype’s pricing advantage over competing forms of communication. Regulations
that decrease the degree of privacy for users of Skype’s products could also slow its adoption. The increasing growth
and popularity of Internet communications heightens the risk that governments will seek to regulate VoIP and
Internet communications, and Skype has received an increasing number of inquiries from regulators about its
products and services. Competitors, including the incumbent telephone companies, may devote substantial
lobbying efforts to seek greater protection for their existing businesses and increased regulation of VoIP. In the
United States, various state legislatures and regulatory agencies are beginning to impose their own requirements and
taxes on VoIP. Some countries have prohibited Skype. In many countries in which Skype products are available, the
laws that may relate to its offerings are unclear. We cannot be certain that Skype or its customers are currently in full
compliance with regulatory or other legal requirements in all countries in which Skype is used. Skype’s failure or
the failure of those with whom Skype transacts business to comply with these requirements could materially
adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, increased regulatory
requirements on VoIP would increase Skype’s costs, and, as a result, our business would suffer.

New rules and regulations with respect to VoIP are being considered in various countries around the world, and
at least some of these rules and regulations are likely to be adopted and to be applicable to Skype. Such new rules
and regulations are likely to increase our costs of doing business and could prevent us from delivering our products
and offerings over the Internet, which could adversely affect Skype’s customer base, and thus its revenue.

Skype depends on key technology that is licensed from third parties.

Skype licenses technology underlying certain key components of its software from third parties it does not
control, including the technology underlying its peer-to-peer architecture and firewall traversal technology and the
video compression/decompression used to provide high video quality. Although Skype has contracts in place with
its third-party technology providers, there can be no assurance that the licensed technology or other technology that
we may seek to license in the future will continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. The
loss of, or inability to maintain, existing licenses could result in a decrease in service quality or loss of service until
equivalent technology or suitable alternatives can be developed, identified, licensed and integrated. While we
believe Skype generally has the ability to either extend these licenses on commercially reasonable terms or identify
and obtain or develop suitable alternatives, the costs associated with licensing or developing such alternatives could
be high and the technical challenge of assuring “backward compatibility” with older versions of Skype’s technology
may be difficult to overcome. Any failure to maintain these licenses on commercially reasonable terms or to license
or develop alternative technologies would harm Skype’s business. Skype and one of its licensors are currently
attempting to resolve a dispute concerning certain key licensed technology. The parties previously entered into a
“standstill agreement” to allow further time to resolve the dispute without the possibility of immediate litigation.
While Skype is continuing to attempt to resolve the matter, in February 2009, Skype terminated this standstill

32

agreement, and either party may commence a lawsuit against the other party beginning in March 2009. Although
Skype is confident of its legal position, as with any litigation, there is the possibility of an adverse result if the matter
is not resolved through negotiation. In such event, continued operation of Skype’s business as currently conducted
would likely not be possible.

Our businesses depend on continued and unimpeded access to the Internet. Internet service providers
may be able to block, degrade, or charge us or our users additional fees for our offerings.

Our customers rely on access to the Internet to use our products and services. In many cases that access is
provided by companies that compete with at least some of our offerings, including incumbent telephone companies,
cable companies, mobile communications companies, and large Internet service providers. Some of these providers
have stated that they may take measures that could degrade, disrupt, or increase the cost of customers’ use of our
offerings by restricting or prohibiting the use of their lines for our offerings, by filtering, blocking, delaying, or
degrading the packets containing the data associated with our products, or by charging increased fees to us or our
users for use of their lines to provide our offerings. Some of these providers have contractually restricted their
customers’ access to VoIP offerings (which would include Skype) through their terms of service with their
customers. These activities are technically feasible and may be permitted by applicable law. In addition, Internet
service providers could attempt to charge us each time our customers use our offerings. Worldwide, a number of
companies have announced plans to take such actions or are selling products designed to facilitate such actions.
Interference with our offerings or higher charges for access to our offerings, whether paid by us or by our customers,
could cause us to lose existing customers, impair our ability to attract new customers, and harm our revenue and
growth.

Our tickets business is subject to regulatory, competitive, and other risks that could harm this business.

Our tickets business, which includes our StubHub business, is subject to numerous risks. Many jurisdictions
have laws and regulations covering the resale of event tickets, and some jurisdictions prohibit the resale of event
tickets at prices above the face value of the tickets. In addition, new laws and regulations may be passed that would
limit our or our users’ ability to continue this business. Regulatory agencies or courts may claim or hold that we are
responsible for ensuring that our users comply with these laws and regulations or that we or our users are either
subject to licensure or prohibited from reselling event tickets in their jurisdictions.

Some event organizers and professional sports teams have expressed concern about the resale of their event
tickets on our sites. In November 2006, the New England Patriots filed suit against StubHub alleging that StubHub’s
resale activities violate Massachusetts’ ticket resale laws and constitute intentional interference with the team’s
relationship with its season ticket holders. Suits alleging a variety of causes of actions have in the past, and may in
the future, be filed against StubHub by venue owners, competitors, ticket buyers and unsuccessful ticket buyers.
Such litigation could result in damage awards, could require us to change our business practices in ways that may be
harmful to our business, or could otherwise negatively affect our tickets business. Our tickets business is also
subject to seasonal fluctuations and the general economic and business conditions that impact the sporting events
and live entertainment industries. The recent economic downturn has resulted in a decrease in ticket prices sold on
our site and has adversely affected revenue and profits. Our tickets business also faces significant competition from
a number of sources, including ticketing service companies (such as TicketMaster and Tickets.com), event
organizers (such as professional sports teams and leagues), ticket brokers, and other online and offline ticket
resellers, such as TicketsNow (which is owned by TicketMaster) and RazorGator. In addition, ticketing service
companies and event organizers have recently begun to issue event tickets through paperless (electronic) ticketing
systems that include restrictions on the transferability of such event tickets. To the extent that event tickets issued in
this manner cannot be resold on our websites, or to the extent that we are otherwise unable to compete with these
competitors, our tickets business could be harmed.

We depend on key personnel.

Our future performance depends substantially on the continued services of our senior management and other
key personnel and our ability to retain and motivate them. We recently changed our Chief Executive Officer and the
heads of all three of our business units. These changes may result in increased attrition of our personnel as new

33

reporting relationships are established and as other companies may increasingly target our executives. We do not
have long-term employment agreements with any of our key personnel, we do not maintain any “key person” life
insurance policies, and many members of our senior management team have fully vested the vast majority of their
in-the-money equity incentives. The loss of the services of any of our executive officers or other key employees
could harm our business. Our new businesses all depend on attracting and retaining key personnel. Our future
success also will depend on our ability to attract, train, retain and motivate highly skilled technical, managerial,
marketing, and customer support personnel. Competition for these personnel is intense, and we may be unable to
successfully attract, integrate, or retain sufficiently qualified personnel. In making employment decisions, par-
ticularly in the Internet and high-technology industries, job candidates often consider the value of the equity awards
they are to receive in connection with their employment. Fluctuations in our stock price may make it more difficult
to retain and motivate employees whose stock option strike prices are substantially above current market prices.
Similarly, decreases in the number of unvested in-the-money stock options held by existing employees, whether
because our stock price has declined, options have vested, or because the size of follow-on option grants has
declined, may make it more difficult to retain and motivate employees.

In the fourth quarter of 2008, we undertook a plan to reduce our global workforce to simplify and streamline
our organization, improve our cost structure and strengthen our overall businesses. These changes have resulted in
the recording of related accounting charges and could harm employee morale and productivity and be disruptive to
our business.

Problems with or price increases by third parties who provide services to us or to our users could harm
our business.

A number of parties provide services to us or to our users that benefit us. Such services include seller tools that
automate and manage listings, merchant tools that manage listings and interface with inventory management
software, storefronts that help our users list items, caching services that make our sites load faster, and shipping
providers that deliver goods sold on our platform, among others. In some cases we have contractual agreements with
these companies that give us a direct financial interest in their success, while in other cases we have none. PayPal is
dependent on the processing companies and banks that link PayPal to the credit card and bank clearing networks.
Similarly, Bill Me Later relies heavily on third parties to operate its services, including merchant processors and
payment gateways to process transactions. Financial, regulatory, or other problems that prevent these companies
from providing services to us or our users could reduce the number of listings on our websites or make completing
transactions or payments on our websites more difficult, and thereby harm our business. Price increases by
companies that provide services to our users could also reduce the number of listings on our websites or make it
more difficult for our users to complete transactions, thereby harming our business. For example, we believe recent
changes in postal rates may have reduced listing volume on our sites in certain categories. Any security breach at
one of these companies could also adversely affect our customers and harm our business.

In addition, we have outsourced certain functions to third-party outside providers, including customer support
and product development functions, which are critical to our operations. If our service providers do not perform
satisfactorily, our operations could be disrupted, which could result in user dissatisfaction and adversely affect our
business, reputation and operating results. Although we generally have been able to renew or extend the terms of
contractual arrangements with third parties who provide services to us on acceptable terms, there can be no
assurance that we will continue to be able to do so in the future, and there can be no assurance that third parties who
provide services directly to our users will continue to do so at reasonable rates or at all. In addition, the current
recession in the U.S. and a worldwide economic slowdown may impact the ability of our outside service providers
to fulfill their obligations to us or our users.

Customer complaints or negative publicity about our customer support or anti-fraud measures could
diminish use of our services.

Customer complaints or negative publicity about our customer support could severely diminish consumer
confidence in and use of our services. Measures we sometimes take to combat risks of fraud and breaches of privacy
and security have the potential to damage relations with our customers or decrease activity on our sites by making
our sites more difficult to use or restricting the activities of certain users. These measures heighten the need for

34

prompt and accurate customer support to resolve irregularities and disputes. Effective customer support requires
significant personnel expense, and this expense, if not managed properly, could significantly impact our profit-
ability. Failure to manage or train our customer support representatives properly could compromise our ability to
handle customer complaints effectively. If we do not handle customer complaints effectively, our reputation may
suffer and we may lose our customers’ confidence.

Because it is providing a financial service and operating in a more regulated environment, PayPal, unlike eBay,
must provide telephone as well as email customer support and must resolve certain customer contacts within shorter
time frames. As part of PayPal’s program to reduce fraud losses and prevent money laundering, it may temporarily
restrict the ability of customers to withdraw their funds if those funds or the customer’s account activity are
identified by PayPal’s risk models as suspicious. PayPal has in the past received negative publicity with respect to its
customer support and account restrictions, and has been the subject of purported class action lawsuits and state
attorney general inquiries alleging, among other things, failure to resolve account restrictions promptly. If PayPal is
unable to provide quality customer support operations in a cost-effective manner, PayPal’s users may have negative
experiences, PayPal may receive additional negative publicity, its ability to attract new customers may be damaged,
and it could become subject to additional litigation. As a result, current and future revenues could suffer, and its
operating margins may decrease. In addition, negative publicity about, or negative experiences with, customer
support for any of our businesses could cause our reputation to suffer or affect consumer confidence in our brands as
a whole.

Our industry is intensely competitive, and other companies or governmental agencies may allege that our
behavior is anti-competitive.

Marketplaces

Marketplaces businesses currently or potentially compete with a number of companies providing both
particular categories of goods and broader ranges of goods. The Internet provides new, rapidly evolving and
intensely competitive channels for the sale of all types of goods. We expect competition to intensify in the future.
The barriers to entry into these channels are relatively low and current offline and new competitors, including small
businesses who want to create and promote their own stores, can easily launch online sites at a nominal cost using
commercially available software or partnering with any one of a number of successful ecommerce companies.

Our broad-based competitors include the vast majority of traditional department, warehouse, discount, and
general merchandise stores (as well as the online operations of these traditional retailers), emerging online retailers,
online classified services, and other shopping channels such as offline and online home shopping networks. Among
others, these include: Wal-Mart, Target, Sears, Macy’s, JC Penney, Costco, Office Depot, Staples, OfficeMax,
Sam’s Club, Amazon.com, Buy.com, AOL.com, Yahoo! Shopping, MSN, QVC, and Home Shopping Network.

A number of companies offer a variety of services that provide channels for buyers to find and buy items from
sellers of all sizes, including online aggregation and classifieds websites such as craigslist (in which we own a
minority equity stake), Google Base, Microsoft Live Expo, and Oodle.com. Our classifieds websites, including
Kijiji, Marktplaats, mobile.de, and Gumtree, offer classifieds listings in the U.S. and a variety of local international
markets. In many markets in which it operates, including in the U.S., our classified platforms compete against more
established online and offline classifieds platforms.

In 2005, we acquired Shopping.com Ltd., an online shopping comparison site. Shopping.com competes with
sites such as Buy.com, Google’s Product Search, Nextag.com, Pricegrabber.com, Shopzilla, and Yahoo! Product
Search, which offer shopping search engines that allow consumers to search the Internet for specified products.
Recent legal developments may affect the utility of shopping comparison sites if manufacturers begin requiring
more uniformity in product pricing. In addition, sellers are increasingly utilizing multiple sales channels, including
the acquisition of new customers by paying for search-related advertisements on search engine sites such as Google
and Yahoo!. We use product search engines and paid search advertising to channel users to our sites, but these
services also have the potential to divert users to other online shopping destinations.

We also compete with many local, regional, and national specialty retailers and exchanges in each of the major
categories of products offered on our websites. For example, category-specific competitors to offerings in our

35

‘Collectibles’ category include, among others, Artfact, Beckett, Bonhams & Butterfields, Bowers and Morena,
Christie’s, Collectiblestoday.com, Collectors Universe, etsy, Franklin Mint, Go Collect, Heritage, Littletoncoin,
Mastronet, Replacements.com, Ruby Lane, Shop At Home, Sotheby’s, Tias, U.S. Mint, U.S. Postal Service, antique
and collectible dealers, antique and collectible fairs, auction houses, estate sales, flea markets and swap meets,
independent coin and stamp dealers, and specialty retailers.

Our international Marketplaces websites compete with similar online and offline channels in each of their
vertical categories in most countries. In addition, they compete with general online ecommerce sites, such as Quelle
and Otto in Germany, Leboncoin. fr and Price Minister in France, Tradus (recently acquired by Naspers) in Poland,
Yahoo-Kimo in Taiwan, Lotte and Gmarket in South Korea, Trading Post, OZtion and Aussie Bidder in Australia,
and Amazon in the United Kingdom and other countries. In some of these countries, there are online sites that have
much larger customer bases and greater brand recognition than we do, and in certain of these jurisdictions there are
competitors that may have a better understanding of local culture and commerce than we do.

The principal competitive factors for Marketplaces include the following:

(cid:129) ability to attract and retain buyers and sellers;

(cid:129) volume of transactions and price and selection of goods;

(cid:129) customer service; and

(cid:129) brand recognition.

With respect to our online competition, additional competitive factors include:

(cid:129) community cohesion, interaction and size;

(cid:129) website ease-of-use and accessibility;

(cid:129) level of trust in the seller;

(cid:129) system reliability;

(cid:129) reliability of delivery and payment;

(cid:129) level of service fees; and

(cid:129) quality of search tools.

Some current and potential competitors have longer operating histories, larger customer bases and greater
brand recognition in other business and Internet sectors than we do. Other online trading services may be acquired
by, receive investments from, or enter into other commercial relationships with well-established and well-financed
companies. As a result, some of our competitors with other revenue sources may be able to devote more resources to
marketing and promotional campaigns, adopt more aggressive pricing policies and devote substantially more
resources to website and systems development than we can. Some of our competitors have offered services for free
and others may do this as well. We may be unable to compete successfully against current and future competitors. In
addition, certain offline competitors may encourage manufacturers to limit or cease distribution of their products to
dealers who sell through online channels such as eBay, or may attempt to use existing or future government
regulation to prohibit or limit online commerce in certain categories of goods or services. The adoption by
manufacturers or government authorities of policies or regulations discouraging the sales of goods or services over
the Internet could force eBay users to stop selling certain products on our websites. Increased competition or anti-
Internet distribution policies or regulations may result in reduced operating margins, loss of market share and
diminished value of our brand. In order to respond to changes in the competitive environment, we may, from time to
time, make pricing, service or marketing decisions or acquisitions that may be controversial with and lead to
dissatisfaction among a number of our sellers, and which could harm our profitability.

Conversely, other companies and government agencies have in the past and may in the future allege that our
actions violate the antitrust or competition laws of the U.S. or other countries, or otherwise constitute unfair
competition. Such claims, even if without foundation, typically are very expensive to defend, involve negative
publicity and diversion of management time and effort, and could result in significant judgments against us.

36

In several jurisdictions, we have taken actions designed to improve the safety of transactions on our websites.
Beginning in June 2008, we have required users in the UK to offer PayPal as a payment alternative on most
transactions on our localized UK website, and since October 2008, we require sellers on eBay.com to accept one or
more accepted payment methods (currently PayPal, credit or debit cards processed through Internet merchant
accounts, and/or ProPay) and no longer allow any forms of paper payment, including checks and money orders, to be
used in the U.S. for most categories of items. While these initiatives are intended to improve and make safer our users’
buying experience and/or increase activity on our sites, certain users may be negatively affected by or react negatively
to these changes. We currently face inquiries from government regulators in various jurisdictions related to such
actions. For example, the Reserve Bank of Australia is currently reviewing our policy requiring sellers to offer PayPal
as a payment alternative on most transactions on our localized Australian website and precluding them from imposing
a surcharge or any other fee for accepting PayPal or other payment methods. We may face similar inquiries from other
government regulators in the future. Any negative reaction to these changes by our users or government authorities
could, among other things, force us to change our operating practices in ways that could harm our business, operating
results and profitability. In addition, certain competitors may offer or continue to offer free shipping or other
transaction related services, which could be impractical or inefficient for eBay sellers to match. New technologies may
increase the competitive pressures by enabling our competitors to offer a lower cost service.

Although we have established Internet traffic arrangements with several large online services and search
engine companies, these arrangements may not be renewed on commercially reasonable terms or these companies
may decide to promote competitive services. Even if these arrangements are renewed, they may not result in
increased usage of our services. In addition, companies that control user access to transactions through network
access, Internet browsers, or search engines, could promote our competitors, channel current or potential users to
their vertically integrated electronic commerce sites or their advertisers’ sites, attempt to restrict our access, or
charge us substantial fees for inclusion. Search engines are increasingly becoming a starting point for online
shopping, and as the costs of operating an online store decline, online sellers may increasingly sell goods through
multiple channels, which could reduce the number and value of transactions these sellers conduct through our sites.

PayPal

The markets for PayPal’s product are intensely competitive and are subject to rapid technological change,
including but not limited to: mobile payments, electronic funds transfer networks starting to allow Internet access,
cross-border access to networks, creation of new networks, expansion of prepaid cards, and bill pay networks.
PayPal competes with existing online and offline payment methods, including, among others:

(cid:129) credit card merchant processors that offer their services to online merchants, including American Express,
Cardservice International, Chase Paymentech, First Data, and Wells Fargo; and payment gateways,
including CyberSource and Authorize.net (which has merged with CyberSource);

(cid:129) money remitters such as MoneyGram and Western Union;

(cid:129) bill payment services, including CheckFree;

(cid:129) processors that provide online merchants the ability to offer their customers the option of paying for
purchases from their bank account, including Certegy, eBillMe, Revolution Money and TeleCheck, a
subsidiary of First Data, or to pay on credit;

(cid:129) providers of traditional payment methods, particularly credit cards, checks, money orders, and Automated

Clearing House transactions;

(cid:129) issuers of stored value targeted at online payments, including VisaBuxx, NetSpend and GreenDot;

(cid:129) mobile payments, including Obopay, TextPayMe (a subsidiary of Amazon), Crandy, LUUP and Payforit;

(cid:129) Amazon Payments, which offers online merchants the ability to accept credit card- and bank-funded

payments from Amazon’s base of online customers on the merchant’s own website; and;

(cid:129) Google Checkout, which enables the online payment of merchants using credit cards.

37

Some of these competitors have longer operating histories, significantly greater financial, technical, mar-
keting, customer service and other resources, greater name recognition, or a larger base of customers in affiliated
businesses than PayPal. PayPal’s competitors may respond to new or emerging technologies and changes in
customer requirements faster and more effectively than PayPal. Some of these competitors may also be subject to
lesser licensing, anti-money laundering, and other regulatory requirements than PayPal, which is subject to
additional regulations based on its licensure as a bank in Luxembourg. They may devote greater resources to the
development, promotion, and sale of products and services than PayPal, and they may offer lower prices. For
example, Google Checkout provided free payment processing through February 1, 2008, and currently offers free
payments processing on transactions in an amount proportionate to certain advertising spending with Google.
Competing services tied to established banks and other financial institutions may offer greater liquidity and
engender greater consumer confidence in the safety and efficacy of their services than PayPal.

Overseas, PayPal faces competition from similar channels and payment methods. In each country, numerous
banks provide standard online credit card acquiring and processing services, and these banks typically have leading
market share. In addition, PayPal faces competition from Visa’s Visa Direct, MasterCard’s MoneySend, Royal Bank
of Scotland’s World Pay and ClickandBuy in the EU, NOCHEX, Moneybookers, NETeller and FirePay in the
United Kingdom, CertaPay and HyperWallet in Canada, Paymate and BPay in Australia, Alipay, YeePay and 99 Bill
in China and Inicis in South Korea. In addition, in certain countries, such as Germany and Australia, electronic
funds transfer is a leading method of payment for both online and offline transactions. As in the U.S., established
banks and other financial institutions that do not currently offer online payments could quickly and easily develop
such a service.

Some of PayPal’s competitors, such as Wells Fargo, First Data, American Express, and Royal Bank of
Scotland, also provide processing or foreign exchange services to PayPal. If PayPal were to seek to expand the
financial products that it offers, either alone or through a commercial alliance or an acquisition, these processing
and foreign exchange relationships could be negatively affected, or these competitors and other processors could
make it more difficult for PayPal to deliver its services.

Skype

The market for Skype’s products is also intensely competitive and characterized by rapid technological
change. We expect Skype’s various communications competitors, including, for example, the providers of online
communications products and telecommunications operators, to continue to improve the performance of their
current products and introduce new products, software, services and technologies. Many telecommunications firms
offer “bundled” services, where a group of services that may include cable or satellite television, internet services
(e.g., cable modem or DSL), and telecommunications are offered for a single monthly price. If Skype’s competitors
successfully introduce new products, offer “bundled” services or enhance their existing products, this could reduce
the market for Skype’s products, increase price competition, or make Skype’s products obsolete, which could lower
Skype’s adoption rates, decrease its ability to attract new users or cause its current users to migrate to a competing
company.

Additionally, several of Skype’s current and potential competitors have longer operating histories, are
substantially larger, and have greater financial, marketing, technical, and other resources. Some also have greater
name recognition and a larger installed base of customers than Skype has.

Our business may be adversely affected by factors that cause our users to spend less time on our websites,
including seasonal factors, national events and increased usage of other websites.

Anything that diverts our users from their customary level of usage of our websites could adversely affect our
business. We would therefore be adversely affected by geopolitical events such as war, the threat of war, or terrorist
activity, and natural disasters, such as hurricanes or earthquakes. Similarly, our results of operations historically
have been seasonal because many of our users reduce their activities on our websites with the onset of good weather
during the summer months, and on and around national holidays. In addition, increased usage of social networking

38

or other entertainment websites may decrease the amount of time users spend on our websites, which could
adversely affect our financial results.

Our failure to cost-effectively manage certain aspects of our business could harm us.

We have expanded our headcount, facilities, and infrastructure in the U.S. and internationally, and anticipate
that further expansion in certain areas will be required as we continue to expand into new lines of business and
geographic areas. This expansion has placed, and we expect it will continue to place, a significant strain on our
management, operational, and financial resources. The areas that are put under strain by our growth include the
following:

(cid:129) Website Usability. User activity rates on our websites depend in part on the quality of our users’
experiences on those sites. The rapid growth in the number and complexity of products and features on
our sites has occasionally caused users to become confused or overwhelmed or has otherwise impaired
users’ experiences on those sites. We are in the process of making numerous improvements to our eBay
websites, including an attempt to improve the user experience on those websites. These attempts at
improvement could fail, or could decrease activity among users who had grown used to or preferred the
existing experience on our sites. Any impairment of customer satisfaction as a result of site usability issues
could lead to a loss of customers or impair our ability to add customers, either of which would harm our
business.

(cid:129) Website Stability. We must constantly add new hardware, update software and add new engineering
personnel to accommodate the increased use of our and our subsidiaries’ websites and the new products and
features we regularly introduce. This upgrade process is expensive, and the increased complexity of our
websites and the need to support multiple platforms as our portfolio of brands grows increases the cost of
additional enhancements. Failure to upgrade our technology, features, transaction processing systems,
security infrastructure, or network infrastructure to accommodate increased traffic or transaction volume
could harm our business. Adverse consequences could include unanticipated system disruptions, slower
response times, degradation in levels of customer support, impaired quality of users’ experiences of our
services, impaired quality of services for third-party application developers using our externally accessible
Application Programming Interface, or API, and delays in reporting accurate financial information. We may
be unable to effectively upgrade and expand our systems in a timely manner or smoothly integrate any newly
developed or purchased technologies or businesses with our existing systems, and any failure to do so could
result in problems on our sites. Further, steps to increase the reliability and redundancy of our systems are
expensive, reduce our margins, and may not be successful in reducing the frequency or duration of
unscheduled downtime.

(cid:129) Customer Account Billing. Our revenues depend on prompt and accurate billing processes. Our failure to
grow our transaction-processing capabilities to accommodate the increasing number of transactions that
must be billed on any of our websites would harm our business and our ability to collect revenue.

(cid:129) Customer Support. We seek to become more efficient in providing our customer support operations. We
intend to provide an increased level of support (including an increasing amount of telephone support) in a
cost-effective manner. If we are unable to provide customer support in a cost-effective manner, users of our
websites may have negative experiences, current and future revenues could suffer, our costs may increase
and our operating margins may decrease.

We must continue to effectively hire, train, and manage new employees. If our new hires perform poorly, if we
are unsuccessful in hiring, training, managing, and integrating these new employees, or if we are not successful in
retaining our existing employees, our business may be harmed. To manage the expected growth of our operations
and personnel, we will need to improve our transaction processing, operational and financial systems, procedures,
and controls. This is a special challenge as we acquire new operations with different systems. Our current and
planned personnel, systems, procedures, and controls may not be adequate to support our future operations. Any
capital investments that we may make will increase our cost base, which will make it more difficult for us to offset
any future revenue shortfalls by expense reductions in the short term.

39

We may have exposure to greater than anticipated tax liabilities.

The determination of our worldwide provision for income taxes and other tax liabilities requires estimation and
significant judgment and there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is
uncertain. Like many other multinational corporations, we are subject to tax in multiple U.S. and foreign tax
jurisdictions and have structured our operations to reduce our effective tax rate. Our determination of our tax
liability is always subject to audit and review by applicable domestic and foreign tax authorities, and we are
currently undergoing a number of investigations, audits and reviews by taxing authorities throughout the world,
including with respect to our tax structure. Any adverse outcome of any such audit or review could have a negative
effect on our business, operating results and financial condition, and the ultimate tax outcome may differ from the
amounts recorded in our financial statements and may materially affect our financial results in the period or periods
for which such determination is made. While we have take reserves based on assumptions and estimates that we
believe are reasonable to cover such eventualities, these reserves may prove to be insufficient in the event that any
taxing authority is successful in asserting tax positions that are contrary to our positions.

We depend on the continued growth of online commerce and communications.

The business of selling goods over the Internet, particularly through online trading, is dynamic and relatively
new. Concerns about fraud, privacy, and other problems may discourage additional consumers from adopting the
Internet as a medium of commerce. In countries such as the U.S., Germany and the U.K., where our services and
online commerce generally have been available for some time and the level of market penetration of our services is
high, acquiring new users for our services may be more difficult and costly than it has been in the past. In order to
expand our user base, we must appeal to and acquire consumers who historically have used traditional means of
commerce to purchase goods and may prefer Internet analogues to such traditional retail means to our offerings,
such as the retailer’s own website. If these consumers prove to be less active than our earlier users, and we are unable
to gain efficiencies in our operating costs, including our cost of acquiring new customers, our business could be
adversely impacted.

Our business depends on the development and maintenance of the Internet infrastructure.

The success of our services will depend largely on the development and maintenance of the Internet
infrastructure. This includes maintenance of a reliable network backbone with the necessary speed, data capacity,
and security, as well as timely development of complementary products, for providing reliable Internet access and
services. The Internet has experienced, and is likely to continue to experience, significant growth in the numbers of
users and amount of traffic. The Internet infrastructure may be unable to support such demands. In addition,
increasing numbers of users, increasing bandwidth requirements, or problems caused by “viruses,” “worms,”
malware and similar programs may harm the performance of the Internet. The backbone computers of the Internet
have been the targets of such programs. The Internet has experienced a variety of outages and other delays as a result
of damage to portions of its infrastructure, and it could face outages and delays in the future. These outages and
delays could reduce the level of Internet usage generally as well as the level of usage of our services.

We may be unable to protect or enforce our own intellectual property rights adequately.

We regard the protection of our trademarks, copyrights, patents, domain names, trade dress, and trade secrets
as critical to our success. We aggressively protect our intellectual property rights by relying on federal, state and
common law rights, as well as a variety of administrative procedures. We also rely on contractual restrictions to
protect our proprietary rights in products and services. We have entered into confidentiality and invention
assignment agreements with our employees and contractors, and confidentiality agreements with parties with
whom we conduct business in order to limit access to and disclosure of our proprietary information. These
contractual arrangements and the other steps we have taken to protect our intellectual property may not prevent
misappropriation of our technology or deter independent development of similar technologies by others. We pursue
the registration of our domain names, trademarks, and service marks in the U.S. and internationally. Effective
trademark, copyright, patent, domain name, trade dress, and trade secret protection is very expensive to maintain
and may require litigation. We must protect our trademarks, patents, and domain names in an increasing number of
jurisdictions, a process that is expensive and may not be successful in every location. For example, Skype is in the

40

process of applying to register the Skype name as a trademark worldwide. In the EU, Skype’s application is being
opposed. If these oppositions to Skype’s applications were to be successful, Skype’s ability to protect its brand
against third-party infringers would be compromised. We have licensed in the past, and expect to license in the
future, certain of our proprietary rights, such as trademarks or copyrighted material, to others. These licensees may
take actions that diminish the value of our proprietary rights or harm our reputation.

We are subject to the risks of owning real property.

We own real property, including land and buildings related to our operations. We have little experience in

managing real property. Ownership of this property subjects us to risks, including:

(cid:129) the possibility of environmental contamination and the costs associated with fixing any environmental

problems;

(cid:129) adverse changes in the value of these properties, due to interest rate changes, changes in the neighborhoods

in which the properties are located, or other factors;

(cid:129) the possible need for structural improvements in order to comply with zoning, seismic, disability act, or other

requirements; and

(cid:129) possible disputes with tenants, neighboring owners, or others.

Some anti-takeover provisions may affect the price of our common stock.

Our Board of Directors has the authority to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock and to determine
the preferences, rights and privileges of those shares without any further vote or action by the stockholders. The
rights of the holders of common stock may be harmed by rights granted to the holders of any preferred stock that
may be issued in the future. Some provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws could have the effect of
making it more difficult for a potential acquirer to acquire a majority of our outstanding voting stock. These include
provisions that provide for a classified board of directors, prohibit stockholders from taking action by written
consent and restrict the ability of stockholders to call special meetings. We are also subject to provisions of
Delaware law that prohibit us from engaging in any business combination with any interested stockholder for a
period of three years from the date the person became an interested stockholder, unless certain conditions are met.
This restriction could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control.

ITEM 1B: UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.

ITEM 2: PROPERTIES

We own and lease various properties in the United States and 25 other countries around the world. We use the
properties for executive and administrative offices, data centers, product development offices and customer service
offices. As of December 31, 2008, our owned and leased properties provided us with aggregate square footage of
approximately 1.7 million and 2.3 million, respectively. Our corporate headquarters of approximately 0.2 million
square feet are located in San Jose, California. As of December 31, 2008, the total square footage generally used by
each of our Marketplaces, Payments and Communications segments was approximately 2.1 million, 1.6 million and
0.1 million, respectively.

From time to time we consider various alternatives related to our long-term facilities needs. While we believe
our existing facilities are adequate to meet our immediate needs, it may become necessary to lease or acquire
additional or alternative space to accommodate any future growth.

ITEM 3: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In August 2006, Louis Vuitton Malletier and Christian Dior Couture filed two lawsuits in the Paris Court of
Commerce against eBay Inc. and eBay International AG. Among other things, the complaint alleges that we
violated French tort law by negligently broadcasting listings posted by third parties offering counterfeit items

41

bearing plaintiffs’ trademarks, and by purchasing certain advertising keywords. Around September 2006, Parfums
Christian Dior, Kenzo Parfums, Parfums Givenchy, and Guerlain Société also filed a lawsuit in the Paris Court of
Commerce against eBay Inc. and eBay International AG. The complaint alleges that we have interfered with the
selective distribution network the plaintiffs established in France and the European Union by allowing third parties
to post listings offering genuine perfumes and cosmetics for sale on our websites. In June 2008, the Paris Court of
Commerce ruled that eBay and eBay International AG were liable for failing to prevent the sale of counterfeit items
on its websites that traded on plaintiffs’ brand names and for interfering with the plaintiffs’ selective distribution
network. The court awarded plaintiffs approximately EUR 38.6 million in damages and issued an injunction
prohibiting all sales of perfumes and cosmetics bearing the Dior, Guerlain, Givenchy and Kenzo brands over all
worldwide eBay sites to the extent that they are accessible from France. We have taken measures to comply with the
injunction and have appealed these rulings. However, these and similar suits may force us to modify our business
practices, which could lower our revenue, increase our costs, or make our websites less convenient to our customers.
Any such results could materially harm our business. Other luxury brand owners have also filed suit against us or
have threatened to do so, seeking to hold us liable for, among other things, alleged counterfeit items listed on our
websites by third parties, for “tester” and other not for resale consumer products listed on our websites by third
parties, for the alleged misuse of trademarks in listings, for alleged violations of selective distribution channel laws,
for alleged non-compliance of consumer protection laws or in connection with paid search advertisements. We
continue to believe that we have meritorious defenses to these suits and intend to defend ourselves vigorously.

In June 2006, Net2Phone, Inc. filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
(No. 06-2469) alleging that eBay Inc., Skype Technologies S.A., and Skype Inc. infringed five patents owned by
Net2Phone relating to point-to-point Internet protocol. The suit seeks an injunction against continuing infringe-
ment, unspecified damages, including treble damages for willful infringement, and interest, costs, and fees. We
have filed an answer and counterclaims asserting that the patents are invalid, unenforceable, and were not infringed.
The parties have completed claim construction briefing and attended a pre-trial conference hearing. The claim
construction hearing is set for March 2009 and the trial date is not yet set. We believe that we have meritorious
defenses and intend to defend ourselves vigorously.

In March 2007, a plaintiff filed a purported antitrust class action lawsuit against eBay in the Western District of
Texas alleging that eBay and its wholly owned subsidiary PayPal “monopolized” markets through various anticompe-
titive acts and tying arrangements. The plaintiff alleges claims under sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, as well as
related state law claims. The complaint seeks treble damages and an injunction. In April 2007, the plaintiff re-filed the
complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (No. 07-CV-01882-RS), and dismissed the
Texas action. In 2007, the case was consolidated with other similar lawsuits (No. 07-CV-01882JF). In June 2007, we filed
a motion to dismiss the class action complaint. In March 2008, the court granted the motion to dismiss the tying claims
with leave to amend and denied the motion with respect to the monopolization claims. Plaintiffs subsequently decided
not to refile the tying claims. The class certification motion is scheduled for June 2009. We believe that we have
meritorious defenses and intend to defend ourselves vigorously.

In May 2007, Netcraft Corporation filed a lawsuit in the Western District of Wisconsin (No. 07-C-0254C)
alleging that eBay and PayPal infringed two of its patents entitled “Internet billing methods.” The suit seeks an
injunction against continuing infringement, unspecified damages, and interest, costs, and fees. In September 2007,
we filed a motion for summary judgment of noninfringement on both patents. In December 2007, the U.S. District
Court for the Western District of Wisconsin entered a judgment granting our motion for summary judgment of non-
infringement on both of the patents that Netcraft asserted against eBay and PayPal. This judgment was affirmed by
the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in December 2008.

In October 2007, PartsRiver filed a lawsuit in the Eastern District of Texas (No. 2-07CV-440-DF) alleging that
eBay, Microsoft, Yahoo!, Shopzilla, PriceGrabber and PriceRunner infringed its patent relating to search methods.
The suit seeks an injunction against continuing infringement, unspecified damages, and interest, costs, and fees.
The defendants have moved to transfer venue and the parties are conducting discovery. Fact discovery cutoff is
scheduled for July 2009, the claim construction hearing is scheduled for April 2009 and trial is scheduled for
October 2009. We believe that we have meritorious defenses and intend to defend ourselves vigorously.

42

eBay’s Korean subsidiary, IAC, has notified a majority of its approximately 20 million users of a data breach
involving personally identifiable information including name, address, resident registration number and some
transaction and refund data (but not including credit card information or real time banking information).
Approximately 141,000 users have sued IAC over this breach in several lawsuits in Korean courts and we expect
more to do so in the future. There is some precedent in Korea for a court to grant “consolation money” for data
breaches without a specific finding of harm from the breach. Such precedents have involved payments of up to
approximately $200 per user. A consumer agency recently made a non-binding recommendation that IAC make
payments of 50,000-100,000 Korean won (approximately $35-70) to consumers who had complained to it as a
result of such breach. IAC intends to vigorously defend itself in this lawsuit.

Other third parties have from time to time claimed, and others may claim in the future, that we have infringed
their intellectual property rights. We are subject to additional patent disputes, and expect that we will increasingly
be subject to patent infringement claims as our services expand in scope and complexity. In particular, we expect
that we may face additional patent infringement claims involving various aspects of our Marketplaces, Payments
and Communications businesses. We have in the past been forced to litigate such claims. We may also become more
vulnerable to third-party claims as laws such as the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, the Lanham Act and the
Communications Decency Act are interpreted by the courts, and as we become subject to laws in jurisdictions where
the underlying laws with respect to the potential liability of online intermediaries like ourselves are either unclear or
less favorable. We believe that additional lawsuits alleging that we have violated copyright or trademark laws will
be filed against us. Intellectual property claims, whether meritorious or not, are time consuming and costly to
resolve, could require expensive changes in our methods of doing business, or could require us to enter into costly
royalty or licensing agreements.

From time to time, we are involved in other disputes or regulatory inquiries that arise in the ordinary course of
business. The number and significance of these disputes and inquiries are increasing as our business expands and
our company grows larger. Any claims or regulatory actions against us, whether meritorious or not, could be time
consuming, result in costly litigation, require significant amounts of management time, and result in the diversion of
significant operational resources.

ITEM 4: SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

There were no submissions of matters to a vote of security holders during the quarter ended December 31,

2008.

43

PART II

ITEM 5: MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Price Range of Common Stock

Our common stock has been traded on The Nasdaq Global Select Market (formerly The Nasdaq National
Market) under the symbol “EBAY” since September 24, 1998. The following table sets forth the high and low per
share prices of our common stock, as reported by The Nasdaq Global Select Market.

High

Low

Year Ended December 31, 2007

First Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $34.35
35.41
Second Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
39.54
Third Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
40.73
Fourth Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Year Ended December 31, 2008

First Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $33.53
33.47
Second Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
29.13
Third Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
22.23
Fourth Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$28.60
30.41
31.87
30.94

$25.10
26.89
19.95
10.91

As of February 11, 2009, there were approximately 4,800 holders of record of our common stock, although we

believe that there are a significantly larger number of beneficial owners of our common stock.

Dividend Policy

We have never paid cash dividends on our stock and do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable

future.

44

Performance Measurement Comparison

The graph below shows the cumulative total stockholder return of an investment of $100 (and the reinvestment
of any dividends thereafter) on December 31, 2003 in (i) our common stock, (ii) the Nasdaq Composite Index,
(iii) the S&P 500 Index and (iv) the S&P North American Technology Internet Index (the successor to the GSTI
Internet Index). We were added to the S&P 500 Index on July 19, 2002. The S&P North American Technology
Internet Index is a modified-capitalization weighted index representing the Internet industry, including Internet
software and services and Internet retail companies. Our stock price performance shown in the graph below is not
indicative of future stock price performance.

The following graph and related information shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or be deemed to be
“filed” with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing, except to the
extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing.

$200

$150

r
a
l
l

o
D

$100

.

.

S
U

$50

$0

2003

2004

2005

2006

Year

2007

2008

eBay

S&P North American Technology Internet Index

Nasdaq Composite Index

S&P 500 Index

45

 
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Stock repurchase activity during the three months ended December 31, 2008 was as follows:

Period

October 1, 2008-October 31, 2008 . . . . . .
November 1, 2008-November 30, 2008 . .
December 1, 2008-December 31, 2008. . .

Total Number
of Shares
Purchased

Average Price
Paid
per Share

Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Programs

Maximum Dollar
Value that May Yet
be Purchased Under
the Programs(1)

—
—
11,438(2)

11,438

$—
$—
$—

—
—
—

—

$656,500,143
$656,500,143
$656,500,143

(1) In July 2006, our Board authorized a stock repurchase program for up to $2.0 billion of our common stock
within two years from the date of authorization. In January 2007, our Board authorized the expansion of this
stock repurchase program to provide for the repurchase of up to an additional $2.0 billion of our common stock
by January 2009. In January 2008, our Board approved an additional stock repurchase program for $2.0 billion
having no expiration date, giving us the ability to repurchase up to $2.85 billion of the common stock under our
combined stock repurchase programs. Under these programs, as of December 31, 2008, we had repurchased in
the aggregate approximately 179.7 million shares of our common stock at an average price of $29.74 per share.
As of December 31, 2008, $656.5 million remained available for further purchases under our stock repurchase
program.

(2) Represents shares of stock withheld from employees to satisfy tax obligations.

46

ITEM 6: SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following selected consolidated financial and supplemental operating data should be read in conjunction
with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations” appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The
consolidated statement of income and the consolidated balance sheet data for the years ended, and as of,
December 31, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements.

2004

Year Ended December 31,
2006(2)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)

2007(2)

2005

2008(2)

Consolidated Statement of Income Data(1):
Net revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3,271,309 $4,552,401 $5,969,741 $7,672,329 $8,541,261
2,228,069
614,415
Cost of net revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,762,972

1,256,792

818,104

Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,656,894

3,734,297

4,712,949

5,909,357

6,313,192

Operating expenses:

Sales and marketing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Product development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
General and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for transaction and loan losses . . .
Amortization of acquired intangible assets . .
Restructuring(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impairment of goodwill(4). . . . . . . . . . . . . .

798,555
240,647
335,076
157,447
65,927
—
—

1,143,580
328,191
479,418
212,460
128,941
—
—

1,882,810
1,587,133
619,727
494,695
904,681
744,363
293,917
266,724
204,104
197,078
—
—
— 1,390,938

1,881,551
725,600
998,871
347,453
234,916
49,119
—

Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,597,652

2,292,590

3,289,993

5,296,177

4,237,510

Income from operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest and other income, net . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,059,242
71,745
(8,879)

1,441,707
111,099
(3,478)

1,422,956
130,017
(5,916)

613,180
154,271
(16,600)

2,075,682
115,919
(8,037)

Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,122,108
(343,885)

1,549,328
(467,285)

1,547,057
(421,418)

750,851
(402,600)

2,183,564
(404,090)

Net income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 778,223 $1,082,043 $1,125,639 $ 348,251 $1,779,474

Net income per share:

Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $

0.59 $

0.79 $

0.80 $

0.26 $

Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $

0.57 $

0.78 $

0.79 $

0.25 $

1.37

1.36

Weighted average shares:

Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,319,458

1,361,708

1,399,251

1,358,797

1,303,454

Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,367,720

1,393,875

1,425,472

1,376,174

1,312,608

47

2004

2005

December 31,
2006
(in thousands)

2007

2008

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . $1,330,045 $ 1,313,580 $ 2,662,792 $ 4,221,191 $ 3,188,928
163,734
Short-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . .
106,178
Long-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . .
2,581,503
Working capital(5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
15,592,439
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Short-term obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
Borrowings under credit agreement

676,264
138,237
4,022,926
15,366,037
—

554,841
277,853
2,452,191
13,494,011
—

804,352
825,667
1,698,302
11,788,986
—

837,409
1,266,289
1,826,279
7,991,051
124,272

(short-term) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . .

—
6,728,341

—
10,047,981

—
10,904,632

200,000
11,704,602

1,000,000
11,083,858

(1) These results include acquired company results of operations beginning on the date of acquisition. For a
summary of recent significant acquisitions, see “Note 3 — Business Combination, Goodwill and Intangible
Assets” to the consolidated financial statements included in this report. Certain prior year amounts have been
reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation. For further details regarding reclassified amounts see
“Note 1 — The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to the consolidated financial
statements included in this report.

(2) Consolidated Statement of Income for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008 includes stock-based
compensation expense under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123 (revised 2004),
“Share-Based Payment” (“FAS 123(R)”) of $317.4 million, $301.8 million and $353.2, respectively. Because
we implemented FAS 123(R) as of January 1, 2006, prior periods do not reflect stock-based compensation
expense related to this new accounting standard. See “Note 15 — Benefit Plans” to the consolidated financial
statements included in this report.

(3) Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2008 includes restructuring charges of
$49.1 million. See “Note 9 — Restructuring” to the consolidated financial statements included in this report.

(4) Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2007 includes a goodwill impairment
charge of $1.4 billion. See “Note 3 — Business Combination, Goodwill and Intangible Assets” to the
consolidated financial statements included in this report.

(5) Working capital is calculated as the difference between total current assets and total current liabilities.

ITEM 7: MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of
the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including statements that involve
expectations, plans or intentions (such as those relating to future business or financial results, new features or
services, or management strategies). You can identify these forward-looking statements by words such as “may,”
“will,” “would,” “should,” “could,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan” and other
similar expressions. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual
results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in our forward-looking statements. Such risks and
uncertainties include, among others, those discussed in “Item 1A: Risk Factors,” of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K as well as our consolidated financial statements, related notes, and the other financial information
appearing elsewhere in this report and our other filings with the SEC. We do not intend, and undertake no
obligation, to update any of our forward-looking statements after the date of this report to reflect actual results or
future events or circumstances. Given these risks and uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue
reliance on such forward-looking statements.

48

You should read the following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in this report.

Overview

We operate three primary business segments: Marketplaces, Payments and Communications. Our Market-
places segment provides the infrastructure to enable global online commerce on a variety of platforms, including the
traditional eBay.com platform, and our other online platforms, such as our online classifieds businesses, our
secondary tickets marketplace (StubHub), our online shopping comparison website (Shopping.com), our apartment
listing service platform (Rent.com), as well as our fixed price media marketplace (Half.com). Our payments
segment is comprised of our online payment solutions — PayPal (which enables individuals and businesses to
securely, easily and quickly send and receive payments online in approximately 190 markets worldwide) and Bill
Me Later (which we acquired in November 2008 and which enables online U.S. merchants to offer, and
U.S. consumers to obtain, transactional credit at the point of sale). Our Communications segment, which consists
of Skype, enables VoIP calls between Skype users and provides low-cost connectivity to traditional fixed-line and
mobile telephones.

Overall, 2008 revenue increased 11% to $8.5 billion, diluted earnings per share increased from $0.25 to $1.36
and operating cash flow increased 9% to $2.9 billion. PayPal, Classifieds, Advertising (in particular text and
graphical advertising) and Skype were the key drivers of growth, with these businesses achieving a revenue growth
rate of 25%, 57%, 40% and 44%, respectively. We also achieved an operating margin of 24%, with segment margins
flat or better across all three of our business segments despite the deteriorating global economic environment in the
latter half of 2008. However, we experienced declining revenue growth rates in total and on a segment basis.

During 2008, two of our key priorities were to reaccelerate the gross merchandise volume (GMV) growth in
our Marketplaces core business and to grow our Payments business off the eBay platform (PayPal’s merchant
services business). In order to reaccelerate growth in GMV, we focused our actions in 2008 on improving eBay’s
Marketplaces by:

(cid:129) Expanding selection;

(cid:129) Improving our trust and safety; and

(cid:129) Making it easier to find great values.

We will continue to focus on evolving a large and complex marketplace to reaccelerate growth in our core

business.

We also made it a priority to expand the presence of PayPal beyond the eBay.com platform to better diversify
our revenue sources and reduce our dependence on the eBay.com platform. During the second half of 2008, net total
payment volume generated by PayPal’s merchant services business exceeded volume on the eBay.com platform.
PayPal’s merchant services business grew 45% in 2008 as we expanded adoption of PayPal across the Internet. Our
acquisition of Bill Me Later in November 2008 is expected to enhance our leadership position in online payment
solutions.

Over the last three years, we have expanded our global footprint with approximately 54% of revenues now
coming from outside the U.S. and diversified our revenue stream with approximately 45% of revenues now coming
from non-Marketplaces transaction revenues.

Some key operating metrics that members of our senior management regularly review to evaluate our financial
results include GMV, number of sold items, net total payment volume, Merchant Services net total payment volume,
SkypeOut Minutes, free cash flow (operating cash flow less capital expenditures), and revenue, excluding
acquisitions and foreign currency impact.

Outlook

The current uncertain economic environment and volatile foreign currency exchange rates make it difficult to
identify trends likely to impact our financial results beyond the first quarter of 2009. We expect revenues and net

49

income in the first quarter of 2009 to be lower than the first quarter of 2008 due primarily to the effect of an
anticipated stronger U.S. dollar as well as the negative impact of the economic environment on consumer spending
and the challenges associated with reaccelerating growth of GMV in our Marketplaces core business. Although the
current economic environment makes it difficult to predict the impact on individual types of expenses, we expect
that cost controls, including our previously-announced restructuring that impacts our employee related operating
expenses, will partially offset the negative effects of an anticipated year-over-year decline in revenues and our
expected investments in our higher growth businesses such as Payments, Classifieds and Communications. We also
expect diluted earnings per share will be negatively impacted by lower interest rates and from dilution resulting
from recent acquisitions.

Results of Operations

Net Revenues

Our net transaction revenues from our Marketplaces segment are derived primarily from listing and final value
fees paid by sellers. For our Payments segment, net transaction revenues are generated primarily by fees paid by
merchants for payment processing services. Our Communications segment net transaction revenues are generated
primarily from fees charged to users to connect Skype’s VoIP product to traditional fixed-line and mobile
telephones. These fees are charged on a per-minute basis or on a subscription basis and we refer to these minutes
as SkypeOut minutes.

Our marketing services and other revenue are generated from all three of our business segments. Our
marketing services are derived principally from the sale of advertisements, revenue sharing arrangements,
classifieds fees, lead referral fees. Our other revenues are derived principally from interest earned from banks
on certain PayPal customer account balances, interest and fees earned on the Bill Me Later loan portfolio and from
contractual arrangements with third parties that provide services to all of our users.

Revenues are attributed to U.S. and international geographies primarily based upon the country in which the
seller, payment recipient, customer, Skype user’s Internet protocol address, online property that generates adver-
tising, or other service provider, as the case may be, is located. Because we generate the majority of our revenue
internationally, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates will impact our results of operations. Based on
changes in foreign currency rates year over year, total net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2008 were
positively impacted by foreign currency translation of approximately $190.9 million compared to the prior year. On
a business segment basis, Marketplaces, Payments and Communications total net revenues for the year ended
December 31, 2008 were positively impacted by foreign currency translation of approximately $158.8 million,
$0.3 million and $31.8 million, respectively. Total net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2007 were
positively impacted by foreign currency translation of approximately $276.0 million compared to the prior year. On
a business segment basis, Marketplaces, Payments and Communications total net revenues for the year ended
December 31, 2007 were positively impacted by foreign currency translation of approximately $222.4 million,
$21.4 million and $32.2 million, respectively. Impact of foreign currency translation only includes changes between
our functional currencies and our U.S. dollar reporting currency.

50

The following table sets forth, for the periods presented, the breakdown of net revenues by type, segment and
geography. In addition, we have provided a table of certain key operating metrics that we believe are significant
factors affecting our net revenues.

Year Ended
December 31,
2006

Percent
Change
from
2006 to 2007

Year Ended
December 31,
2007
(in thousands, except percent changes)

Percent
Change
from
2007 to 2008

Year Ended
December 31,
2008

Net Revenues by Type(1):
Net transaction revenues

Marketplaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3,864,502
1,401,824
Payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
189,110
Communications . . . . . . . . . . . . .

21% $4,680,835
1,838,539
31%
364,564
93%

1%
26%
44%

$4,711,057
2,320,495
525,803

Total net transaction

revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5,455,436

26%

6,883,938

10%

7,557,355

Marketing services and other

revenues
Marketplaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Communications . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total marketing services and

469,788
38,706
5,811

45%
128%
197%

683,056
88,077
17,258

other revenues . . . . . . . . . . .

514,305

53%

788,391

Total net revenues . . . . . . . . . . $5,969,741

29% $7,672,329

Net Revenues by Segment:

Marketplaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $4,334,290
1,440,530
Payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
194,921
Communications . . . . . . . . . . . . .

24% $5,363,891
1,926,616
34%
381,822
96%

Total net revenues . . . . . . . . . . $5,969,741

29% $7,672,329

Net Revenues by Geography:

U.S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3,108,986
2,860,755
International . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

20% $3,742,670
3,929,659
37%

Total net revenues . . . . . . . . . . $5,969,741

29% $7,672,329

28%
(6)%
45%

25%

11%

4%
25%
44%

11%

6%
16%

11%

875,694
83,174
25,038

983,906

$8,541,261

$5,586,751
2,403,669
550,841

$8,541,261

$3,969,482
4,571,779

$8,541,261

2006

Year Ended December 31,
2007
(in millions)

2008

Supplemental Operating Data:
Marketplaces Segment:

Gross merchandise volume(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$52,474

$59,353

$59,650

Payments Segment:

Net total payment volume(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$35,800

$47,470

$60,146

Communications Segment:

Registered Users(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SkypeOut Minutes(5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

171.2
4,095

276.3
5,650

405.3
8,374

(1) Beginning with the first quarter of 2008, we reclassified revenue generated primarily from our Marketplaces
non-GMV based businesses (which include Shopping.com, Rent.com and our classified websites) from “Net

51

Transaction Revenues” to “Marketing Services and Other Revenues” in order to more closely align our net
transaction revenue presentation with our key operating metrics. “Marketing Services and Other Revenues”
also includes amounts previously reflected under “Advertising and Other Revenue.” Prior period amounts have
been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. Consolidated net revenues, as well as total segment
revenues, are unchanged.

(2) Total value of all successfully closed items between users on eBay Marketplaces trading platforms during the

period, regardless of whether the buyer and seller actually consummated the transaction.

(3) Total dollar volume of payments, net of payment reversals, successfully completed through our payments

network or on Bill Me Later accounts during the period, excluding the payment gateway business.

(4) Cumulative number of unique user accounts, which includes users who may have registered via non-Skype
based websites, as of the end of the period. Users may register more than once and, as a result, may have more
than one account.

(5) Cumulative number of minutes that Skype users were connected with Skype’s VoIP product to traditional fixed-

line and mobile telephones.

Seasonality

The following table sets forth, for the periods presented, our total net revenues and the sequential quarterly

growth of these net revenues.

Quarter Ended

March 31

June 30

September 30

December 31

(in thousands, except percentages)

2006

Net revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Current quarter vs prior quarter . . . . . . .

$1,390,419

$1,410,784

$1,448,637

$1,719,901

5%

1%

3%

19%

2007

Net revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Current quarter vs prior quarter . . . . . . .

$1,768,074

$1,834,429

$1,889,220

$2,180,606

3%

4%

3%

15%

2008

Net revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Current quarter vs prior quarter . . . . . . .

$2,192,223

$2,195,661

$2,117,531

$2,035,846

1%

0%

(4)%

(4)%

We expect transaction activity patterns on our websites to mirror general consumer buying patterns and, as
such, our fourth quarter has historically been our strongest quarter of sequential revenue growth. However, this was
not the case in 2008 due to the impact of the global economic environment and strengthening U.S. dollar, which
impacted the fourth quarter in particular.

Marketplaces Net Transaction Revenues

Marketplaces net transaction revenues increased $30.2 million, or 1%, in 2008 compared to 2007, which is
consistent with our 0.5% increase in GMVover the same period. GMV generated by our largest category, vehicles,
declined 9%. Excluding vehicles, GMV would have increased 3% due primarily to an increase in our second largest
category, consumer electronics. Although we achieved growth in the number of sold items on our eBay Market-
places trading platforms, the average selling price declined primarily as a result of consumer buying patterns in a
weakening global economic environment. Expenditures for buyer incentive programs, which are generally recorded
as a reduction in revenue, reduced revenue growth by approximately 4% in 2008. In addition, pricing discounts and
changes had a negative impact on revenue growth.

Marketplaces net transaction revenues increased $816.3 million, or 21%, in 2007 compared to 2006 due
primarily to a 13% increase in GMV during 2007 compared to 2006, and a shift to higher revenue generating
categories. GMV growth in 2007 occurred across all major categories, with the vehicles, consumer electronics,

52

home and garden, clothing and accessories and tickets having the most significant positive dollar impact when
compared to 2006.

Marketplaces net transaction revenues earned internationally were $2.5 billion in 2008 and 2007 and
$2.0 billion in 2006, representing 54%, 53% and 51% of total Marketplaces net transaction revenues, respectively.

Payments Net Transaction Revenues

Payments net transaction revenues increased $482.0 million, or 26%, in 2008, compared to 2007, which is
consistent with our year-over-year increase in net total payment volume (TPV) of 27%. Payments net transaction
revenues increased due primarily to growth in our Merchant Services business and the increase in PayPal’s
penetration of eBay Marketplaces GMV. Our Merchant Services net TPV experienced 49% year-over-year growth
in 2008 and represented 49% of PayPal’s net TPV in 2008. The increase in our Merchant Services business resulted
from more online merchants, both domestically and internationally, adding PayPal as a payment option.

Payments net transaction revenues increased $436.7 million, or 31%, in 2007 compared to 2006, which is
consistent with our year-over-year increase in net TPVof 33%. Payments net transaction revenues due primarily to
growth in our Merchant Services business and the increase in PayPal’s penetration of eBay Marketplaces GMV. Our
Merchant Services net TPV experienced 59% year-over-year growth in 2007 and represented 42% of PayPal’s
net TPV in 2007. The increase in Merchant Services business resulted from more online merchants, both
domestically and internationally, adding PayPal as a payment option.

Payments net transaction revenues earned internationally totaled $1.0 billion in 2008, $0.8 billion in 2007, and
$0.5 billion in 2006, representing 44%, 42% and 38% of total Payments net transaction revenues, respectively.
International growth in our Payments segment continues to benefit from the expansion of our geographical
footprint, the increase in the number of currencies supported by PayPal and the increase in cross-border payments,
which generate larger fees.

Communications Net Transaction Revenues

Communications net transaction revenues increased $161.2 million, or 44%, in 2008 compared to 2007. The
increase in net transaction revenues was due primarily to our year-over-year increase in SkypeOut minutes of
2.7 billion. The increase in SkypeOut minutes was due primarily to the growth in the cumulative number of Skype
registered users to 405.3 million at December 31, 2008 from 276.3 million at December 31, 2007. The growth in
Skype registered users was primarily due to its marketing activities and strategic partnership initiatives.

Communications net transaction revenues increased $175.5 million, or 93%, in 2007 compared to 2006. The
increase in net transaction revenues was due primarily to our year-over-year increase in SkypeOut minutes of
1.6 billion. The increase in SkypeOut minutes was due primarily to the growth in the cumulative number of Skype
registered users to 276.3 million at December 31, 2007 from 171.2 million at December 31, 2006.

Net transaction revenues from Communications earned internationally totaled $0.4 billion in 2008, $0.3 billion
in 2007 and $0.2 billion in 2006, representing 83%, 84% and 86% of total Communications net transaction
revenues, respectively. Skype revenue is primarily generated in Europe.

Marketing Services and Other Revenues

Marketing services and other revenues increased $195.5 million, or 25%, in 2008 compared to 2007 and
represented 12% of total net revenues in 2008 compared to 10% of total net revenues in 2007. Marketing services
and other revenues growth was due primarily to an increase in text and graphical advertising revenue and an
increase in classifieds revenue, partially offset by a decline in Shopping.com revenue due to the impact of rule
changes made by third-party search engines that adversely affected click-through traffic to retailers from our
Shopping.com website and reduced associated fees. Additionally, a decline in interest rates reduced interest earned
from banks on certain U.S. PayPal customer account balances and negatively impacted revenue growth in 2008. The
decrease in interest earned on certain U.S. PayPal customer account balances was partially offset by interest income
from our Bill Me Later loan portfolio.

53

Marketing services and other revenues increased $274.1 million, or 53%, in 2007 compared to 2006 and
represented 10% of total net revenues compared to 9% of total net revenues in 2006. Marketing services and other
revenue growth in 2007 was due primarily to an increase in text and graphical advertising revenue, classifieds
revenue, Shopping.com revenue and interest earned from banks on certain U.S. PayPal customer accounts. Prior to
the fourth quarter of 2006, these certain U.S. PayPal customer account balances were maintained in non-interest
bearing accounts.

Summary of Cost of Net Revenues, Operating Expenses, Non-Operating Items and Provision for Income
Taxes

In 2008, we reclassified certain operating expenses related to the provision for transaction losses, customer
protection programs and bad debt expense from “Sales and Marketing” and “General and Administrative” expenses
to “Provision for Transaction and Loan Losses.” Prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the
current presentation. Consolidated operating expenses, as well as segment direct costs, are unchanged.

The following table summarizes changes in cost of net revenues, operating expenses, non-operating items and

provision for income taxes:

Year Ended December 31,
2007

2008

2006

Change from
2006 to 2007

Change from
2007 to 2008

in Dollars

in %

in Dollars

in %

Cost of net revenues . . . . . . . $1,256,792 $1,762,972
1,882,810
Sales and marketing . . . . . . .
619,727
Product development. . . . . . .
General and administrative . .
904,681
Provision for transaction and
loan losses . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,587,133
494,695
744,363

266,724

293,917

(in thousands, except percentages)
$2,228,069 $ 506,180
295,677
1,881,551
125,032
725,600
160,318
998,871

40% $
19%
25%
22%

465,097
(1,259)
105,873
94,190

26%
(0)%
17%
10%

347,453

27,193

10%

53,536

18%

Amortization of acquired

intangible assets . . . . . . . .
Restructuring . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impairment of goodwill
. . . .
Interest and other income,

net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for income taxes . .

Cost of Net Revenues

204,104
197,078
—
—
— 1,390,938

234,916
49,119

7,026

— —

4%

15%
30,812
100%
49,119
100% (1,390,938) (100)%

— 1,390,938

130,017
5,916
421,418

154,271
16,600
402,600

115,919
8,037
404,090

24,254
10,684
(18,818)

19%
181%
(4)%

(38,352)
(8,563)
1,490

(25)%
(52)%
0%

Cost of net revenues. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,256,792
As a percentage of net revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

21.1%

2006

2007
(in thousands, except percentages)
$1,762,972

2008

$2,228,069

23.0%

26.1%

Cost of net revenues consists primarily of costs associated with payment processing, customer support and site
operations and Skype telecommunications. Significant components of these costs include bank transaction fees,
credit card interchange fees, assessments, Bill Me Later related interest charges, employee compensation,
contractor costs, facilities costs, depreciation of equipment and amortization expense.

The increase in cost of net revenues of $465.1 million, or 26%, in 2008 compared to 2007 was due primarily to
an increase in customer support and site operations costs, payment processing costs and Skype telecommunication
costs. Aggregate customer support and site operations costs increased approximately $205.7 million, or 28%, due
primarily to the development and expansion of our customer support and site operations infrastructure to support
our growth in transaction volume as demonstrated through the increase in net TPV. Payment processing costs
increased approximately $165.2 million, or 24%, due primarily to the 27% increase in net TPV and an increase in

54

the proportion of customer transactions funded with credit cards, which have higher associated processing costs,
offset by a more favorable geographic mix and lower per transaction costs. Skype telecommunications costs
increased by $62.9 million, or 28%, due to the increase of SkypeOut minutes. Cost of net revenues increased as a
percentage of net revenues primarily as a result of the growth of our lower gross margin businesses, particularly
PayPal and Skype.

The increase in cost of net revenues of $506.2 million, or 40%, in 2007 compared to 2006 was due primarily to
an increase in payment processing costs, customer support and site operations costs and Skype telecommunications
costs. Payment processing costs increased approximately $200.1 million, or 40%, due primarily to the 33% increase
in PayPal’s net TPV, an increase in the proportion of customer transactions funded with credit cards, which have
higher associated processing costs, and increased Marketplaces transaction activity. Aggregate customer support
and site operations costs increased approximately $153.1 million, or 26%, due to the development and expansion of
our customer support and site operations infrastructure to support our growth in transaction volume as demonstrated
through the increases in both GMV and net TPV. Skype telecommunications costs increased by $86.2 million, or
64%, due to the increase of SkypeOut minutes. Cost of net revenues increased as a percentage of net revenues
primarily as a result of the growth of our lower gross margin businesses, particularly PayPal and Skype.

Sales and Marketing

Sales and marketing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,587,133
As a percentage of net revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

26.6%

2006

2007
(in thousands, except percentages)
$1,882,810

2008

$1,881,551

24.5%

22.0%

Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of advertising costs, marketing programs and employee

compensation for sales and marketing staff.

Sales and marketing expenses decreased $1.3 million in 2008 compared to 2007 as we increased the use of
buyer and seller incentive programs (for which certain associated expenses are recorded as a reduction in revenue
instead of sales and marketing expense) as opposed to online and offline marketing programs as we shifted our
marketing focus from customer acquisition to customer retention. Marketing and advertising program costs
decreased approximately $100.4 million partially offset by an $87.7 million increase in employee-related costs due
to a net increase in staffing. Our marketing expenses are largely variable, based on growth in revenue and changes in
advertising rates. Sales and marketing expense as a percentage of net revenues decreased from 2007, due to more
efficient spending within our Marketplaces segment as we shifted the focus of our marketing programs, as well as
the growth of our Payments and Communications segments, each of which has a lower relative sales and marketing
expenses than our Marketplaces segment.

Sales and marketing expenses increased $295.7 million, or 19%, in 2007 compared to 2006, due to our
continued investment in retaining and growing our active user base. We direct customers to our websites primarily
through a number of online marketing channels such as sponsored search, portal advertising, email campaigns and
other initiatives. Growth in advertising and marketing costs, as well as employee-related costs, comprised the
majority of the increases. Combined advertising and marketing costs increased $222.5 million due to an increase in
global television and online marketing campaigns. Employee-related costs and the use of contractors increased by
$48.7 million as we continued to expand our domestic and international operations. Sales and marketing expense as
a percentage of net revenues decreased from 2006, due to more efficient spending within our Marketplaces segment
as we continued to refine our marketing programs and to the growth of our Payments and Communications
segments, each of which has lower relative sales and marketing expenses than our Marketplaces segment.

Product Development

Product development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $494,695
As a percentage of net revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

8.3%

2006
2008
2007
(in thousands, except percentages)
$619,727

$725,600

8.1%

8.5%

55

Product development expenses consist primarily of employee compensation, contractor costs, facilities costs
and depreciation on equipment. Product development expenses are net of required capitalization of major site and
other product development efforts, including the development of our next generation platform architecture,
migration of certain platforms, seller tools and Payments services projects. These capitalized costs totaled
$112.7 million in 2008, $110.6 million in 2007 and $67.9 million in 2006, and are primarily reflected as a cost
of net revenues when amortized in future periods.

Product development expenses increased $105.9 million, or 17%, in 2008 compared to 2007 due primarily to
an increase in staffing, consultant costs, facility costs and equipment related costs to support several platform
development initiatives to enhance the user experience and expand our existing product offerings primarily across
our Marketplaces and Payments segments. Product development expenses as a percentage of net revenues increased
slightly from 2007 as we added capacity at a faster rate than we generated revenue.

Product development expenses increased $125.0 million, or 25%, in 2007 compared to 2006 due primarily to
an increase in staffing, consultant costs, facility costs and equipment related costs to support several platform
development initiatives to enhance the user experience and expand our existing product offerings primarily across
our Marketplaces and Payments segments. Product development expenses as a percentage of net revenues
decreased slightly from 2006 as we continued to add capacity at a slower rate than we generated revenue.

General and Administrative

General and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $744,363
As a percentage of net revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

12.5%

2006
2008
2007
(in thousands, except percentages)
$904,681

$998,871

11.8%

11.7%

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of employee compensation, contractor costs, facilities
costs, depreciation of equipment, employer payroll taxes on employee stock-based compensation, insurance and
professional fees.

General and administrative expenses increased $94.2 million, or 10%, in 2008 compared to 2007 due primarily
to an increase in professional services, employee-related costs and facilities costs. Professional services costs
increased $54.5 million due primarily to legal related costs incurred in connection with various ongoing litigation
that can fluctuate from period to period. Employee-related costs and facilities costs increased by approximately
$40.2 million due to a net increase in headcount. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenue
decreased slightly from 2007 due to our continued leverage of our existing infrastructure.

General and administrative expenses increased $160.3 million, or 22%, in 2007 compared to 2006 due
primarily to an increase in employee-related costs, facilities costs, and professional services. Employee-related
costs and facilities costs increased by approximately $111.6 million due primarily to an increase in headcount.
Professional services costs increased $35.7 million. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of net
revenue decreased from 2006 due to our continued leverage of our existing infrastructure.

Provision for Transaction and Loan Losses

Provision for transaction and loan losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $266,724
As a percentage of net revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.5%

2008
2007
2006
(in thousands, except percentages)
$293,917

$347,453

3.8%

4.1%

Provision for transaction and loan losses primarily consists of bad debt expense associated with our accounts
receivable balance, loan reserves associated with our principal loan receivable balance, PayPal transaction loss
expense, as well our losses resulting from our customer protection programs.

Provision for transaction and loan losses increased $53.5 million, or 18%, in 2008 compared to 2007 due
primarily to an increase in transaction loss expense and an increase in bad debt expense. PayPal transaction loss
expense increased by approximately $32.2 million because of the increase in net TPV. Bad debt expense increased

56

approximately $22.1 million due to increased revenues and an increase in our bad debt reserve rate due to the global
economic environment.

Provision for transaction and loan losses increased $27.2 million, or 10%, in 2007 compared to 2006 due
primarily to an increase in transaction loss expense, losses from our consumer protection programs and bad debt
expense. PayPal’s transaction loss rate, which is the transaction loss expense as a percentage of PayPal’s net TPV,
decreased to 0.29% during 2007 compared to 0.35% during 2006 as we continued to refine our fraud prevention
tools; however, transaction loss expense still increased by approximately $12.8 million because of the increase in
net TPV. Losses from our customer protection programs and bad debt expense increased $14.4 million due to
increased revenues and a lower bad debt reserve rate.

Amortization of Acquired Intangible Assets

Amortization of acquired intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $197,078
As a percentage of net revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.3%

2006
2008
2007
(in thousands, except percentages)
$204,104

$234,916

2.7%

2.8%

From time to time we have purchased, and we expect to continue to purchase, assets or businesses to accelerate
category and geographic expansion, increase the features, functions, and formats available to our users and maintain
a leading role in ecommerce, online payments and online communications. These purchase transactions generally
result in the creation of acquired intangible assets with finite lives and lead to a corresponding increase in the
amortization expense in future periods. We amortize intangible assets over the period of estimated benefit, using the
straight-line method and estimated useful lives ranging from one to eight years. The increase in amortization of
acquired amortizable intangibles during 2008 and 2007 compared to prior years is due to the business acquisitions
consummated during 2008, 2007 and 2006. See “Note 3 — Business Combinations, Goodwill and Intangible
Assets” to the consolidated financial statements included in this report.

Restructuring

In October 2008, we implemented a strategic reduction of our existing global workforce by approximately
800 employees worldwide to simplify and streamline our organization and strengthen the overall competitiveness of
our existing businesses. The majority of the costs will impact our Marketplaces business in the U.S. As a result of
this initiative, we estimate that we will incur aggregate costs of approximately $65.0-70.0 million. During the year
ended December 31, 2008, total restructuring charges amounted to $49.1 million, less than our original 2008
estimate of $60.0 million to 70.0 million, as disclosed on our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on
October 6, 2008. The restructuring activities are expected to be substantially complete by the end of the first quarter
of 2009. Once completed, the restructuring activities are expected to result in an annual cost savings of approx-
imately $150.0 million. See “Note 9 — Restructuring” to the consolidated financial statements included in this
report.

Impairment of Goodwill

During 2006, 2007 and 2008, we conducted our annual impairment test of goodwill as of August 31 in
accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” As a result of this test, no goodwill
impairment charges were recorded during 2008 and 2006. However, in 2007, we recorded a $1.4 billion impairment
of goodwill charge related to our Communications segment. Our estimates of future operating results for our
Communications reporting unit are for an early stage business with limited financial history, as well as developing
revenue models. These factors increase the risk of differences between projected and actual performance that could
impact future estimates of fair value of the Communications reporting unit. See “Note 3 — Business Combinations,
Goodwill and Intangible Assets” to the consolidated financial statements included in this report.

57

Interest and Other Income, Net

Interest and other income, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $130,017
As a percentage of net revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.2%

2006
2008
2007
(in thousands, except percentages)
$154,271

$115,919

2.0%

1.4%

Interest and other income, net consists primarily of interest earned on cash, cash equivalents and investments as
well as foreign currency exchange transaction gains and losses, our portion of unconsolidated joint venture and
equity investment results and other miscellaneous transactions not related to our primary operations.

Interest and other income, net decreased $38.4 million, or 25%, in 2008 as compared to 2007 due primarily to
lower cash, cash equivalents, and investments balances and lower interest rates, as well as losses from our portion of
unconsolidated joint ventures and equity investments, offset by foreign currency exchange gains. The weighted-
average interest rate of our cash and interest bearing investments portfolio decreased to 3.5% in 2008 from 4.2% in
2007.

Interest and other income, net increased $24.3 million, or 19%, in 2007 as compared to 2006 due primarily to
higher cash, cash equivalents, and investments balances and higher interest rates, partially offset by losses from our
portion of unconsolidated joint ventures and equity investments. The weighted-average interest rate of our cash and
interest bearing investments portfolio increased to 4.2% in 2007 from 3.8% in 2006.

Interest Expense

Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $5,916
As a percentage of net revenues. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

0.1%

2006

2007
(in thousands, except percentages)
$8,037
$16,600

2008

0.2%

0.1%

Interest expense consists of interest charges on the amount drawn under our credit agreement and certain
accrued contingencies. The decrease in interest expense during 2008 compared to the prior year is due primarily to
less borrowing and lower interest rates. In addition, as a result of the acquisition of Bill Me Later, we include a
portion of interest expense within cost of net revenues which represents our estimated cost of funds associated with
Bill Me Later loan activity. The increase in interest expense in 2007 compared to 2006 was due primarily to more
borrowing under our credit agreement.

Provision for Income Taxes

Provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $421,418
As a percentage of net revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Effective tax rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7.1%
27%

5.2%
54%

4.7%
19%

2006
2008
2007
(in thousands, except percentages)
$402,600

$404,090

The provision for income taxes differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory U.S. federal rate
principally due to foreign income with lower tax rates and from tax credits that lower the effective tax rate, offset by
state taxes, subsidiary losses and an impairment charge in 2007 for which we have not provided a benefit and other
factors that impact the effective tax rate.

The lower effective tax rate in 2008 compared to 2007 was due to the goodwill impairment charge in 2007 with
respect to our Communications reporting unit which is non-deductible for tax purposes, partially offset by a tax
benefit from a ruling issued by a tax authority related to prior periods recognized in 2007. The higher effective tax
rates in 2007 as compared to 2006 resulted primarily from the goodwill impairment charge in 2007.

58

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flows

2006

Year Ended December 31,
2007
(in thousands)

2008

Consolidated Cash Flow Data:
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents . .

$ 2,247,791
228,853
(1,260,687)
133,255

$2,641,109
(693,146)
(693,392)
303,828

$ 2,881,995
(2,057,346)
(1,673,851)
(183,061)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents . . . .

$ 1,349,212

$1,558,399

$(1,032,263)

Operating Activities

We generated cash from operating activities in amounts greater than net income in 2006, 2007 and 2008, due
primarily to non-cash charges to earnings and tax benefits from stock-based compensation. Non-cash charges to
earnings included depreciation and amortization on our long-term assets, stock-based compensation and the
provision for transaction and loan losses. Non-cash charges in 2007 also included a $1.4 billion goodwill
impairment charge (including the $530.3 million earn out settlement payment).

Cash paid for income taxes in 2006, 2007 and 2008 was $179.2 million, $363.0 million and $366.8 million,

respectively.

Investing Activities

The net cash used in investing activities in 2008 and 2007 was due primarily to cash paid for acquisitions and
the purchase of property and equipment, which was offset in 2007 by cash generated by the sale of investments. The
net cash provided by investing activities in 2006 reflected the cash generated from the sale of investments offset by
the purchase of property and equipment. Purchases of property and equipment, net totaled $565.9 million in 2008,
$454.0 million in 2007, and $515.4 million in 2006, related primarily to purchases of computer equipment and
software to support our site operations, customer support and international expansion. Cash expended for
acquisitions, net of cash acquired, totaled approximately $1.4 billion in 2008, $863.6 million in 2007, and
$45.5 million in 2006. In 2008, acquisition activity of $1.4 billion consisted primarily of the acquisition of Fraud
Sciences, Den Bla˚ Avis and BilBasen and Bill Me Later. In 2007, acquisition activity primarily consisted of a
$530.3 million earn out settlement payment related to our 2005 Skype acquisition and our acquisition of StubHub.
In 2006, we acquired Tradera.com.

Financing Activities

The net cash flows used in financing activities of $1.7 billion in 2008 were due primarily to the repurchase of
approximately 80.6 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate purchase price of approximately
$2.2 billion and the repayment of a bank obligation of $434.0 million assumed in the Bill Me Later acquisition,
offset by the proceeds from stock option exercises totaling $135.1 million and $800.0 million of net proceeds from
borrowings under our credit agreement. The net cash flows used in financing activities of $693.4 million in 2007
were due primarily to the repurchase of approximately 44.6 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate
purchase price of approximately $1.5 billion, offset by the proceeds from stock option exercises totaling
$507.0 million and $200.0 million of net proceeds from borrowings under our credit agreement. The net cash
flows used in financing activities of $1.3 billion in 2006 were due primarily to the repurchase of approximately
54.5 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $1.7 billion, offset by the
proceeds from stock option exercises totaling $313.5 million. Prior to 2006, we had not repurchased our common
stock under a stock repurchase program.

59

The negative effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents during 2008 was due to the strengthening of
the U.S. dollar against other foreign currencies, primarily the Euro. The positive effect of exchange rates on cash
and cash equivalents during 2007 and 2006 was due to the weakening of the U.S. dollar against other foreign
currencies, primarily the Euro.

Stock Repurchases

In July 2006, our Board authorized the repurchase of up to $2.0 billion of our common stock within two years
from the date of authorization. During 2006, we repurchased approximately 54.5 million shares of our common
stock at an average price of $30.56 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $1.7 billion. In January 2007, our
Board authorized, and we announced, an expansion of the stock repurchase program to provide for the repurchase of
up to an additional $2.0 billion of our common stock over the next two years. During 2007, we repurchased
approximately 44.6 million shares of our common stock at an average price of $33.42 per share for an aggregate
purchase price of $1.5 billion under this stock repurchase program. In January 2008, our Board authorized, and we
announced, another stock repurchase program of up to $2.0 billion of our common stock. During 2008, we
repurchased approximately 80.6 million shares of our common stock at an average price of $27.15 per share for an
aggregate purchase price of $2.2 billion, under these stock repurchase programs.

Our stock repurchase programs may be limited or terminated at any time without prior notice. Stock
repurchases under these programs may be made through a variety of open market and privately negotiated
transactions, including structured stock repurchase transactions or other derivative transactions, at times and in such
amounts as management deems appropriate and will be funded from the company’s working capital or other
financing alternatives. The timing and actual number of shares repurchased will depend on a variety of factors
including corporate and regulatory requirements, price and other market conditions and management’s determi-
nation as to the appropriate use of our cash. The programs are intended to comply with the volume, timing and other
limitations set forth in Rule 10b-18 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Credit Agreement

In August 2007, we entered into an amendment to our 2006 credit agreement. The amendment agreement
increased the lender commitments and borrowing capacity under the 2006 credit agreement from its prior level of
$1.0 billion to $2.0 billion, maintained an option to increase borrowing capacity by an additional $1.0 billion (after
giving effect to the $1.0 billion increase described above) and extended the maturity date by an additional year to
November 7, 2012. Lehman Brothers Commercial Bank was a participating lender in our $2.0 billion credit
agreement. As a result of the bankruptcy of its parent company, our available line of credit has been effectively
reduced by its commitment of $160.0 million. As of December 31, 2008, $1.0 billion was outstanding and
$840.0 million was available under the credit agreement.

Liquidity and Capital Resource Requirements

At December 31, 2008, we had cash and cash equivalents of $3.2 billion, compared to $4.2 billion at
December 31, 2007. At December 31, 2008, we held balances in cash and cash equivalents outside the U.S. in
certain of our foreign operations totaling approximately $2.8 billion. If these cash and cash equivalents were
distributed to the U.S. we may be subject to additional U.S. taxes in certain circumstances. See “Note 16 — Income
Taxes” to the consolidated financial statements included in this report. Our available cash and cash equivalents are
held in bank deposits and money market funds. We actively monitor the third-party depository institutions that hold
our cash and cash equivalents. Our emphasis is primarily on safety of principal while secondarily maximizing yield
on those funds. We diversify our cash and cash equivalents among counterparties to minimize exposure to any one
of these entities. To date, we have experienced no material loss or lack of access to our invested cash or cash
equivalents; however, we can provide no assurances that access to our invested cash and cash equivalents will not be
impacted by adverse conditions in the financial markets.

At any point in time we have funds in our operating accounts and customer accounts that are with third party
financial institutions. These balances in the U.S. may exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)
insurance limits. While we monitor the cash balances in our operating accounts, these cash balances could be

60

impacted if the underlying financial institutions fail or could be subject to other adverse conditions in the financial
markets.

We believe that existing cash and cash equivalents of approximately $3.2 billion, together with cash expected
to be generated from operations and cash available through our credit agreement, will be sufficient to fund our
operating activities, capital expenditures, Bill Me Later loan portfolio, stock repurchases and other obligations for
the foreseeable future.

Commitments and Contingencies

We have certain fixed contractual obligations and commitments that include future estimated payments for
general operating purposes. Changes in our business needs, contractual cancellation provisions, fluctuating interest
rates, and other factors may result in actual payments differing from the estimates. We cannot provide certainty
regarding the timing and amounts of these payments. We have presented below a summary of the most significant
assumptions used in our determination of amounts presented in the tables, in order to assist in the review of this
information within the context of our consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. The
following table summarizes our fixed contractual obligations and commitments (in thousands):

Payments Due By Year Ending December 31,

Operating
Leases

Purchase
Obligations

2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 77,975
63,190
2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
35,672
2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
22,834
2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
16,755
2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
23,109
Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$486,139
136,772
60,552
45,111
—
—

Total

$564,114
199,962
96,224
67,945
16,755
23,109

$239,535

$728,574

$968,109

Operating lease amounts include minimum rental payments under our non-cancelable operating leases for
office facilities, as well as limited computer and office equipment that we utilize under lease arrangements. The
amounts presented are consistent with contractual terms and are not expected to differ significantly, unless a
substantial change in our headcount needs requires us to expand our occupied space or exit an office facility early.

Purchase obligation amounts include minimum purchase commitments for advertising, capital expenditures
(computer equipment, software applications, engineering development services, construction contracts) and other
goods and services that were entered into through our ordinary course of business. For those contractual
arrangements in which there are significant performance requirements, we have developed estimates to project
expected payment obligations. These estimates have been developed based upon historical trends, when available,
and our anticipated future obligations. Given the significance of such performance requirements within our
advertising and other arrangements, actual payments could differ significantly from these estimates.

We have $1.0 billion outstanding under our credit agreement at December 31, 2008, which we have classified
as a current liability. We may repay the amount outstanding under the line of credit within the next twelve months.

As we are unable to reasonably predict the timing of settlement of liabilities related to unrecognized tax
benefits under FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (FIN 48), the table does
not include $754.0 million of such non-current liabilities recorded on our consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2008.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2008, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to
have, a current or future material effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations, liquidity,
capital expenditures or capital resources. In Europe, we have a cash pooling arrangement with a financial institution
for cash management purposes. This arrangement allows for cash withdrawals from this financial institution based
upon our aggregate operating cash balances held in Europe within the same financial institution (“Aggregate Cash

61

Deposits”). This arrangement also allows us to withdraw amounts exceeding the Aggregate Cash Deposits up to an
agreed-upon limit. The net balance of the withdrawals and the Aggregate Cash Deposits are used by the financial
institution as a basis for calculating our net interest expense or income. As of December 31, 2008, we had a total of
$1.8 billion in cash withdrawals offsetting our $1.8 billion in Aggregate Cash Deposits held within the same
financial institution under this cash pooling arrangement.

Customer balances held as direct claims against us, primarily PayPal, are included on our consolidated balance
sheet in funds receivable and customer accounts with an offsetting current liability in funds payable and amounts
due to customers, and totaled approximately $1.1 billion as of December 31, 2008 and 2007. Customer funds held
by PayPal as an agent or custodian on behalf of our customers are not reflected in our consolidated balance sheets.
These funds include funds on behalf of U.S. customers that are deposited in bank accounts insured by the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation and funds that U.S. customers choose to invest in the PayPal Money Market Fund,
which totaled approximately $1.9 billion and $1.8 billion as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The
PayPal Money Market Fund is invested in a portfolio managed by Barclays Global Fund Advisors.

Indemnification Provisions

In the ordinary course of business, we have included limited indemnification provisions in certain of our
agreements with parties with whom we have commercial relations, including our standard marketing, promotions
and application-programming-interface license agreements. Under these contracts, we generally indemnify, hold
harmless, and agree to reimburse the indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party in
connection with claims by a third party with respect to our domain names, trademarks, logos and other branding
elements to the extent that such marks are applicable to our performance under the subject agreement. In a limited
number of agreements, we have provided an indemnity for other types of third-party claims, which are indemnities
mainly related to various intellectual property rights. In our PayPal business, we have provided an indemnity to our
payment processors in the event of certain third-party claims or card association fines against the processor arising
out of conduct by PayPal or PayPal customers. It is not possible to determine the maximum potential loss under
these indemnification provisions due to our limited history of prior indemnification claims and the unique facts and
circumstances involved in each particular provision. To date, no significant costs have been incurred, either
individually or collectively, in connection with our indemnification provisions.

Critical Accounting Policies, Judgments and Estimates

General

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements and related notes requires us to make judgments,
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We have based our estimates on historical experience and on various
other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for
making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
Our senior management has discussed the development, selection and disclosure of these estimates with the Audit
Committee of our Board of Directors. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or
conditions.

An accounting policy is considered to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on
assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, and if different estimates that
reasonably could have been used, or changes in the accounting estimates that are reasonably likely to occur
periodically, could materially impact the consolidated financial statements. We believe the following critical
accounting policies reflect the more significant estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of our
consolidated financial statements. The following descriptions of critical accounting policies, judgments and
estimates should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and other disclosures included
in this report.

62

Provision for Transaction and Loan Losses

We are exposed to losses due to uncollectible receivable and loan accounts, credit card and other payment
misuse, as well as non-performance of and loan losses from sellers who accept payment through PayPal. Provisions
for these items represent our estimate of actual losses based on our historical experience, actuarial techniques, the
age and delinquency rates of receivables, the credit quality of the relevant loan, as well as economic and regulatory
conditions. The following table illustrates the provision as a percentage of net revenues for 2006, 2007 and 2008 (in
thousands, except percentages):

Year Ended December 31,
2007

2008

2006

Net revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $5,969,741
Provision for transaction and loan losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 266,724
Provision for transaction and loan losses as a % of net

$7,672,329
$ 293,917

$8,541,261
$ 347,453

revenues. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.5%

3.8%

4.1%

Determining appropriate allowances for these losses is an inherently uncertain process, and ultimate losses
may vary from the current estimates. We regularly update our allowance estimates as new facts become known and
events occur that may impact the settlement or recovery of losses. The allowances are maintained at a level we deem
appropriate to adequately provide for losses incurred at the balance sheet date. An aggregate 50 basis point
deviation from our estimates would have resulted in an increase or decrease in operating income of approximately
$42.7 million resulting in an approximate $0.03 change in diluted earnings per share.

Legal Contingencies

In connection with certain pending litigation and other claims, we have estimated the range of probable loss,
net of expected recoveries, and provided for such losses through charges to our consolidated statement of income.
These estimates have been based on our assessment of the facts and circumstances at each balance sheet date and are
subject to change based upon new information and future events.

From time to time, we are involved in disputes that arise in the ordinary course of business. We are currently
involved in certain legal proceedings as discussed in “Item 1A: Risk Factors,” “Item 3: Legal Proceedings” and
“Note 11 — Commitments and Contingencies — Litigation and Other Legal Matters” to the consolidated financial
statements included in this report. We believe that we have meritorious defenses to the claims against us, and we
intend to defend ourselves vigorously. However, even if successful, our defense against certain actions will be costly
and could divert our management’s time. If the plaintiffs were to prevail on certain claims, we might be forced to
pay significant damages and licensing fees, modify our business practices or even be prohibited from conducting a
significant part of our business. Any such results could materially harm our business and could result in a material
adverse impact on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of all or any of our three businesses.

Accounting for Income Taxes

We are required to recognize a provision for income taxes based upon the taxable income and temporary
differences for each of the tax jurisdictions in which we operate. This process requires a calculation of taxes payable
under currently enacted tax laws around the world and an analysis of temporary differences between the book and
tax bases of our assets and liabilities, including various accruals, allowances, depreciation and amortization. The tax
effect of these temporary differences is reported as deferred tax assets and liabilities in our consolidated balance
sheet. We also assess the likelihood that our net deferred tax assets will be realized from future taxable income. To
the extent we believe that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be
realized, we establish a valuation allowance. At December 31, 2008, we had a valuation allowance on certain
foreign net operating losses based on our assessment that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax asset will not
be realized. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance or change the allowance in a period, we reflect the
change with a corresponding increase or decrease in our tax provision in our consolidated statement of income or
against additional paid-in-capital in our consolidated balance sheet to the extent any tax benefits would have
otherwise been allocated to equity.

63

Our U.S. businesses generate sufficient cash flow to fully fund their operating requirements, and we expect that
profits earned outside the U.S. will be fully utilized to fund our continued international expansion. Accordingly, we
have not provided for U.S. federal income and foreign withholding taxes on non-U.S. subsidiaries’ undistributed
earnings as of December 31, 2008, because such earnings are intended to be reinvested indefinitely. In the event that
our future international expansion plans change and such amounts are not reinvested indefinitely, we would be
subject to U.S. income taxes partially offset by foreign tax credits.

The following table illustrates our effective tax rates for 2006, 2007 and 2008 (in thousands, except

percentages):

Year Ended December 31,
2007

2006

2008

Provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $421,418
As a % of income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

27%

$402,600

$404,090

54%

19%

We believe historically, these provisions have adequately provided for our actual income tax liabilities. Our
future effective tax rates could be adversely affected by earnings being lower than anticipated in countries where we
have lower statutory rates and higher than anticipated in countries where we have higher statutory rates, by changes
in the valuations of our deferred tax assets or liabilities, or by changes or interpretations in tax laws, regulations or
accounting principles. In addition, we are subject to the continuous examination of our income tax returns by the
Internal Revenue Service, various state tax authorities and other various foreign tax authorities. We regularly assess
the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision
for income taxes.

Based on our results for the year ended December 31, 2008, a one-percentage point change in our provision for
income taxes as a percentage of income before taxes would have resulted in an increase or decrease in the provision
of approximately $21.8 million, resulting in an approximate $0.02 change in diluted earnings per share.

We adopted the provisions of FIN 48 as of the beginning of 2007. Prior to adoption, our policy was to establish
reserves that reflected the probable outcome of known tax contingencies. The effects of final resolution, if any, were
recognized as changes to the effective income tax rate in the period of resolution. FIN 48 requires application of a
more likely than not threshold to the recognition and derecognition of uncertain tax positions. If the recognition
threshold is met, FIN 48 permits us to recognize a tax benefit measured at the largest amount of the tax benefit that,
in our judgment, is more than 50 percent likely to be realized upon settlement. It further requires that a change in
judgment related to the expected ultimate resolution of uncertain tax positions be recognized in earnings in the
quarter of such change.

We file annual income tax returns in multiple taxing jurisdictions around the world. A number of years may
elapse before an uncertain tax position is audited and finally resolved. While it is often difficult to predict the final
outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular uncertain tax position, we believe that our reserves for income
taxes reflect the most likely outcome. We adjust these reserves, as well as the related interest, in light of changing
facts and circumstances. Settlement of any particular position could require the use of cash.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue from services rendered when the following four revenue recognition criteria are met:
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, services have been rendered, the selling price is fixed or deter-
minable, and collectability is reasonably assured. We may enter into certain revenue transactions that involve
multiple element arrangements (arrangements with more than one deliverable). We also may enter into arrange-
ments to purchase goods and/or services from certain customers. As a result, significant contract interpretation is
sometimes required to determine appropriate accounting for these transactions including: (1) whether an arrange-
ment exists; (2) how the arrangement consideration should be allocated among potential multiple arrangements;
(3) when to recognize revenue on the deliverables; (4) whether all elements of the arrangement have been delivered;
(5) whether the arrangement should be reported gross (as a principal) versus net (as an agent); (6) whether we
receive a separately identifiable benefit from the purchase arrangements with our customer for which we can
reasonably estimate fair value; and (7) whether the arrangement would be characterized as revenue or

64

reimbursement of costs incurred. Changes in judgments on these assumptions and estimates could impact the timing
or amount of revenue recognition.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

The purchase price of an acquired company is allocated between intangible assets and the net tangible assets of
the acquired business with the residual of the purchase price recorded as goodwill. The determination of the value of
the intangible assets acquired involves certain judgments and estimates. These judgments can include, but are not
limited to, the cash flows that an asset is expected to generate in the future and the appropriate weighted average cost
of capital.

At December 31, 2008, our goodwill totaled $7.0 billion and our identifiable intangible assets totaled
$736.1 million. We assess the impairment of goodwill of our reporting units annually, or more often if events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. This assessment is based upon a
discounted cash flow analysis and analysis of our market capitalization. The estimate of cash flow is based upon,
among other things, certain assumptions about expected future operating performance and an appropriate discount
rate determined by our management. Our estimates of discounted cash flows may differ from actual cash flows due
to, among other things, economic conditions, changes to our business model or changes in operating performance.
Additionally, certain estimates of discounted cash flows involve businesses with limited financial history and
developing revenue models, which increase the risk of differences between the projected and actual performance.
Significant differences between these estimates and actual cash flows could materially affect our future financial
results. These factors increase the risk of differences between projected and actual performance that could impact
future estimates of fair value of all reporting units, particularly our Communications reporting unit. We conducted
our annual impairment test of goodwill as of August 31, 2008 in accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets.” As a result of this test we determined that no adjustment to the carrying value of goodwill
for any reportable units was required. As a result our annual impairment test of goodwill as of August 31, 2007, we
concluded that the carrying amount of our Communications reporting unit exceeded its fair value and recorded an
impairment loss of approximately $1.4 billion during the year ended December 31, 2007. The impairment charge
includes the impact of the earn out settlement payment with certain former shareholders of Skype and was
determined by comparing the carrying value of goodwill in our Communications reporting unit with the implied fair
value of the goodwill. See “Note 3 — Business Combinations, Goodwill and Intangible Assets” to the consolidated
financial statements included in this report. There was no impairment of goodwill or identifiable intangible assets in
2006. As of December 31, 2008, we determined that no events or circumstances from August 31, 2008 through
December 31, 2008 indicate that a further assessment was necessary.

Stock-Based Compensation

On January 1, 2006, we adopted FAS 123(R), which requires a fair value measurement and recognition of
compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to our employees and directors, including
employee stock options, employee stock purchases and restricted stock awards over the service period for awards
expected to vest. Stock-based compensation expense recognized for 2006, 2007 and 2008 was $317.4 million,
$301.8 million and $353.3 million, respectively. See “Note 15 — Benefit Plans” to the consolidated financial
statements included in this report.

We calculated the fair value of each restricted stock award based on our stock price on the date of grant. We
calculated the fair value of each option award on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
The determination of fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model is
affected by our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables.
The use of a Black-Scholes model requires extensive actual employee exercise behavior data and a number of
complex assumptions including expected life, expected volatility, risk-free interest rate and dividend yield. As a
result, the future stock-based compensation expense may differ from our historical amounts. The weighted-average

65

grant-date fair value of stock options granted during 2006, 2007 and 2008 was $10.47, $10.60 and $7.46 per share,
respectively, using the Black-Scholes model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

Year Ended December 31,
2007

2008

2006

Risk-free interest rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected life . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividend yield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected volatility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.7%
3.0 years
0%
36%

4.5%
3.5 years
0%
37%

2.3%
3.8 years
0%
34%

Our computation of expected volatility for 2006, 2007 and 2008 was based on a combination of historical and
market-based implied volatility from traded options on our stock. Our computation of expected life was determined
based on historical experience of similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms of the stock-based
awards, vesting schedules and expectations of future employee behavior. The interest rate for periods within the
contractual life of the award is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The estimation of
awards that will ultimately vest requires judgment, and to the extent actual results or updated estimates differ from
our current estimates, such amounts will be recorded as a cumulative adjustment in the period estimates are revised.
We consider many factors when estimating forfeitures, including employee class and historical experience.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (FAS) No. 141 (Revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (FAS 141(R)). FAS 141(R)
establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer in a business combination recognizes and measures in
its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interests in the
acquiree, as well as the goodwill acquired. Significant changes from current practice resulting from FAS 141(R)
include the expansion of the definitions of a “business” and a “business combination.” For all business combinations
(whether partial, full or step acquisitions), the acquirer will record 100% of all assets and liabilities of the acquired
business, including goodwill, generally at their fair values; contingent consideration will be recognized at its fair
value on the acquisition date and, for certain arrangements, changes in fair value will be recognized in earnings until
settlement; and acquisition-related transaction and restructuring costs will be expensed rather than treated as part of
the cost of the acquisition. FAS 141(R) also establishes disclosure requirements to enable users to evaluate the
nature and financial effects of the business combination. FAS 141(R) applies prospectively to business combi-
nations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or
after December 15, 2008. FAS 141(R) may have an impact on our consolidated financial statements. The nature and
magnitude of the specific impact will depend upon the nature, terms, and size of the acquisitions consummated after
the effective date.

In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements — An amendment of ARB No. 51” (FAS 160). FAS 160 amends Accounting Research Bulletin 51,
“Consolidated Financial Statements,” to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest
in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary,
which is sometimes referred to as minority interest, is a third-party ownership interest in the consolidated entity that
should be reported as a component of equity in the consolidated financial statements. Among other requirements,
FAS 160 requires the consolidated statement of income to be reported at amounts that include the amounts
attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest. FAS 160 also requires disclosure on the face of the
consolidated statement of income of the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the
noncontrolling interest. FAS 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning
on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is not permitted. We do not believe the adoption of FAS 160 will
have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 157-2 (FSP 157-2), which delays the effective date of
FAS 157 one year for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those recognized or disclosed at fair
value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. FSP 157-2 is effective for us beginning January 1, 2009. We do
not believe the adoption of FSP 157-2 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

66

In March 2008, the FASB issued FAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities” (FAS 161). FAS 161 amends and expands the disclosure requirements of FAS 133, “Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” and requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies
for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of gains and losses on derivative instru-
ments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. This statement is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal periods beginning after November 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is
not permitted. We do not believe the adoption of FAS 161 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.

In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FAS 142-3, “Determination of Useful Life of Intangible
Assets” (FSP 142-3). FSP 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing the renewal or
extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FAS 142, “Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets.” FSP 142-3 also requires expanded disclosure regarding the determination of
intangible asset useful lives. FSP 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Earlier
adoption is not permitted. We do not believe the adoption of FSP 142-3 will have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 7A: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Interest Rate Risk

The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while secondarily maximizing yields
without significantly increasing risk. To achieve this objective in the current uncertain global financial markets, as
of December 31, 2008, approximately 92% of our total cash and investment portfolio were held in bank deposits and
money market funds. As such, changes in interest rates will impact interest income. As of December 31, 2008, we
held no direct investments in auction rate securities, collateralized debt obligations, structured investment vehicles
or mortgaged-backed securities. Additionally, changes in interest rates will impact our interest sensitive credit
agreement and accordingly, impact interest expense or cost of net revenues.

Equity Price Risk

We are exposed to equity price risk on marketable equity instruments due to market volatility. At December 31,
2008, the total fair value of our marketable equity instruments was $133.3 million, which represented approx-
imately 4% of our total cash and investment portfolio.

Investment Risk

As of December 31, 2008, our recorded cost basis and equity investments was $100.7 million. These
investments relate primarily to equity-method investments in private companies. We review our investments for
impairment when events and circumstances indicate a decline in fair value of such assets below carrying value is
other-than-temporary. Our analysis includes review of recent operating results and trends, recent sales/acquisitions
of the investee securities, and other publicly available data.

Foreign Currency Exposures

An increasing proportion of our operations conducted outside the U.S. Our foreign currency exposure
continues to evolve as we grow internationally. The objective of our foreign exchange exposure management
program is to identify material foreign currency exposures and to manage these exposures to minimize the potential
effects of currency fluctuations on our reported consolidated cash flow and results of operations.

International net revenues result from transactions by our foreign operations and are typically denominated in
the local currency of each country. These operations also incur most of their expenses in the local currency.
Accordingly, certain foreign operations use the local currency, which is primarily the Euro, and to a lesser extent,
the British pound Australian dollars and Korean won, as their functional currency. Our international operations are
subject to risks typical of international operations, including, but not limited to, differing economic conditions,
changes in political climate, differing tax structures, other regulations and restrictions, and foreign exchange rate

67

volatility. Accordingly, our future results could be materially adversely impacted by changes in these or other
factors.

Our primary foreign currency exposures are transaction, economic and translation:

Transaction Exposure

Around the world, we have various assets and liabilities, primarily receivables, investments and accounts
payable (including inter-company transactions) that are denominated in currencies other than the relevant entity’s
functional currency. In certain circumstances, changes in the functional currency value of these assets and liabilities
create fluctuations in our reported consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows. We may
enter into foreign exchange contracts or other instruments to minimize the short-term foreign currency fluctuations
on such assets and liabilities. The gains and losses on the foreign exchange contracts offset the transaction gains and
losses on certain foreign currency receivables, investments and payables recognized in earnings. As of Decem-
ber 31, 2008, we had outstanding foreign exchange hedge contracts with notional values equivalent to approx-
imately $132.4 million with maturity dates within 34 days. Transaction gains and losses on the contracts and the
assets and liabilities are recognized each period in interest and other income, net included in our consolidated
statement of income.

Economic Exposure

We transact business in various foreign currencies and have significant international revenues as well as costs
denominated in foreign currencies, subjecting us to foreign currency risks. In addition, we charge our international
subsidiaries on a monthly basis for their use of intellectual property and technology and for certain corporate
services provided by eBay and by PayPal. These charges are denominated in Euros and these forecasted inter-
company transactions represent a foreign currency cash flow exposure. We purchase foreign exchange contracts,
generally with maturities of 12 months or less, to reduce the volatility of cash flows related primarily to forecasted
revenue and intercompany transactions denominated in certain foreign currencies. The objective of the foreign
exchange contracts is to better ensure that the U.S. dollar-equivalent cash flows are not adversely affected by
changes in the U.S. dollar/foreign currency exchange rate. Pursuant to Financial Accounting Standards No. 133
“Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (FAS 133), we expect the hedge of certain of these
forecasted transactions to be highly effective in offsetting potential changes in cash flows attributed to a change in
the U.S. dollar/foreign currency exchange rate. Accordingly, the effective portion of the derivative’s gain or loss is
initially reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and subsequently reclassified
into the financial statements line item in which the hedged item is recorded in the same period the forecasted
transaction affects earnings.

During the year ended December 31, 2008 the realized gains on these hedges were $17.1 million. During the
years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the realized gains and losses related to these hedges were not significant.
The notional amount of our economic hedges designated for hedge accounting treatment was $428.9 million and
$515.7 as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. As of December 31, 2008, net of losses, our unrealized
gains related to economic hedges recorded to accumulated other comprehensive income was $40.5 million. The
loss, net of gains, recorded to accumulated other comprehensive income as of December 31, 2007 was not
significant. We did not have any economic hedges in place as of December 31, 2006.

Translation Exposure

As our international operations grow, fluctuations in the foreign currencies create volatility in our reported
results of operations because we are required to consolidate the results of operations of our foreign currency
denominated subsidiaries. We may decide to purchase foreign exchange contracts or other instruments to offset the
earnings impact of currency fluctuations. Such contracts will be marked-to-market on a monthly basis and any
unrealized gain or loss will be recorded in interest and other income, net.

Foreign exchange rate fluctuations may adversely impact our financial position as the assets and liabilities of
our foreign operations are translated into U.S. dollars in preparing our consolidated balance sheet. The cumulative
effect of foreign exchange rate fluctuations on our consolidated financial position at the end of December 31, 2008,

68

was a net translation gain of approximately $788.2 million. This gain is recognized as an adjustment to
stockholders’ equity through accumulated other comprehensive income. Additionally, foreign exchange rate
fluctuations may adversely impact our operating results as the revenues and expenses of our foreign operations
are translated into U.S. dollars in preparing our consolidated statement of income. The effect of foreign exchange
rate fluctuations positively impacted our consolidated net revenues and operating income for the year ended
December 31, 2008 by approximately $190.9 million and $130.6 million, respectively, compared to the prior year.
Impact of foreign currency translation only includes changes between our functional currencies and our U.S. dollar
reporting currency.

We consolidate the earnings of our international subsidiaries by converting them into U.S. dollars in
accordance with FAS No. 52 “Foreign Currency Translation” (FAS 52). Such earnings will fluctuate when there
is a change in foreign currency exchange rates. We enter into transactions to hedge portions of our foreign currency
denominated earnings translation exposure using either exchange contracts or other instruments. All contracts that
hedge translation exposure mature ratably over the quarter in which they are executed. During the year ended
December 31, 2008, the realized gains related to these hedges was approximately $26.3 million.

A hypothetical uniform 10% strengthening or weakening in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the Euro,
British pound, Australian dollar, and Korean won in which our revenues and profits are denominated would result in
a decrease/increase to operating income of approximately $153.8 million. There are inherent limitations in the
sensitivity analysis presented, due primarily to the assumption that foreign exchange rate movements are linear and
instantaneous. As a result, the analysis is unable to reflect the potential effects of more complex market changes that
could arise, which may positively or negatively affect income.

ITEM 8: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes listed in Part IV, Item 15(a)(1) of this Annual

Report on Form 10-K are included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 9: CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in the Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the
Exchange Act) required by Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b), our principal executive officer and our
principal financial officer have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective.

Changes in internal controls. There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting as
defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) that occurred during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our management is respon-
sible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our management,
including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness
of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Frame-
work issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on its evaluation
under the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal
control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2008.

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008 has been audited by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which
appears in Item 15(a) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

69

ITEM 9B: OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable.

PART III

ITEM 10: DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement for our 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed

with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the year ended December 31, 2008.

Code of Ethics, Governance Guidelines and Committee Charters

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all eBay employees. We have also
adopted a Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers that applies to our senior financial officers, including our
principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. The Code of Ethics for
Senior Financial Officers is included in our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics posted on our website at
http://investor.ebay.com/governance.cfm. We will post any amendments to or waivers from the Code of Ethics for
Senior Financial Officers at that location.

We have also adopted Governance Guidelines for the Board of Directors and a written committee charter for
each of our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.
Each of these documents is available on our website at http://investor.ebay.com/governance.cfm.

ITEM 11: EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement for our 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed

with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the year ended December 31, 2008.

ITEM 12: SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement for our 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed

with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the year ended December 31, 2008.

ITEM 13: CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR

INDEPENDENCE

Incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement for our 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed

with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the year ended December 31, 2008.

ITEM 14: PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement for our 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed

with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the year ended December 31, 2008.

70

PART IV

ITEM 15: EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE

(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report:

1. Consolidated Financial Statements:

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Balance Sheet
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Statement of Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Statement of Other Comprehensive Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Page
Number

75
76
77
78
79
80
81

2. Financial Statement Schedule:

Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

111

71

All other schedules have been omitted because the information required to be set forth therein is not applicable

or is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

3. Exhibits.

No.

2.01

2.02

Exhibit Description

Sale and Purchase Agreement dated as of
September 11, 2005, by and among Registrant,
Skype Technologies S.A. and the parties
identified on Schedule 1 thereto.
Earn Out Agreement dated as of September 11,
2005, by and among Registrant, Skype
Technologies S.A. and the parties identified on
Schedule I thereto.

3.01

2.03+ Form of Option Assumption Agreement.
2.04+ Form of EMI Rollover Agreement.
2.05

Amendment No. 1 to Earn Out Agreement dated
as of December 29, 2005, by and among
Registrant, Skype Technologies S.A. and the
parties identified on Schedule I thereto.
Registrant’s Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation.
Registrant’s Amended and Restated Bylaws.
Form of Specimen Certificate for Registrant’s
Common Stock.
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of
September 11, 2005, by and among Registrant
and the parties identified on Schedule I thereto.
10.01+ Form of Indemnity Agreement entered into by

3.02
4.01

4.02

Filed with
this 10-K

Incorporated by Reference

Form

File No.

Date Filed

8-K

000-24821

9/15/2005

8-K

000-24821

9/15/2005

8-K
8-K
10-K

000-24821
000-24821
000-24821

10/18/2005
10/18/2005
2/24/2006

10-Q

000-24821

7/27/2005

8-K
S-1

8-K

000-24821
333-59097

10/3/2008
8/19/1998

000-24821

9/15/2005

S-1

333-59097

7/15/1998

Registrant with each of its directors and
executive officers.

10.02+ Registrant’s 1996 Stock Option Plan, as

S-1

333-59097

7/15/1998

amended.

10.03+ Registrant’s 1997 Stock Option Plan, as

10-K

000-24821

2/28/2007

amended.

10.04+ Registrant’s 1998 Equity Incentive Plan, as

10-K

000-24821

2/28/2007

amended.

10.05+ Form of Stock Bonus Agreement under
Registrant’s 1998 Equity Incentive Plan.
10.06+ Form of Stock Option Agreement under
Registrant’s 1998 Equity Incentive Plan.

10-Q

000-24821

10/27/2004

10-Q

000-24821

10/27/2004

10.07+ Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (and

10-K

000-24821

2/28/2007

Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement) under Registrant’s 1998 Equity
Incentive Plan.

10.08+ Registrant’s Amended and Restated 1998
Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

10-Q

000-24821

7/27/2007

10.09+ Registrant’s 1998 Directors Stock Option Plan,

10-K

000-24821

2/28/2007

as amended.

10.10+ Registrant’s 1999 Global Equity Incentive Plan,

10-Q

000-24821

7/27/2007

as amended.

72

No.

Exhibit Description

10.11+ Form of Stock Option Agreement under

Registrant’s 1999 Global Equity Incentive Plan.
10.12+ Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under
Registrant’s 1999 Global Equity Incentive Plan.

Filed with
this 10-K

Incorporated by Reference

Form

File No.

Date Filed

10-Q

000-24821

10/27/2004

10-K

000-24821

2/28/2007

10.13+ Registrant’s 2001 Equity Incentive Plan, as

10-K

000-24821

2/28/2007

amended.

10.14+ Form of Stock Option Agreement under
Registrant’s 2001 Equity Incentive Plan.

10-Q

000-24821

10/27/2004

10.15+ Registrant’s 2003 Deferred Stock Unit Plan, as

10-K

000-24821

2/28/2007

amended.

10.16+ Form of 2003 Deferred Stock Unit Plan Electing
Director Award Agreement, as amended.

10-Q

000-24821

4/25/2006

10.17+ Form of 2003 Deferred Stock Unit Plan New

10-Q

000-24821

4/25/2006

Director Award Agreement, as amended.
10.18+ Form of 2003 Deferred Stock Unit Plan
Restricted Stock Unit Grant Notice and
Agreement.

10-Q/A

000-24821

4/24/2008

10.19+ Registrant’s 2008 Equity Incentive Award Plan.
10.20+ Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (and

8-K
8-K

000-24821
000-24821

6/25/2008
6/25/2008

Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement) under Registrant’s 2008 Equity
Incentive Award Plan.

10.21+ eBay Incentive Plan.
10.22+ eBay Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan.
10.23+ Employment Letter Agreement dated January 16,
1998, between Margaret C. Whitman and
Registrant.

10.24+ Stock Option Agreement dated June 9, 1998

between Registrant and Scott D. Cook.
10.25+ Employment Letter Agreement dated August 20,
1998, between Michael R. Jacobson and
Registrant.

10.26+ Offer Letter to John Donahoe dated

November 16, 2004.

10.27+ Offer Letter to Elizabeth Axelrod dated

December 7, 2004 and addendum thereto dated
February 16, 2005.

10.28+ Offer Letter to Robert H. Swan dated

February 10, 2006.

10.29+ Letter Agreement regarding supplemental

relocation assistance dated July 12, 2006 to
Robert H. Swan.

10.30+ Employment Letter Agreement between

Margaret C. Whitman and Registrant.
10.31+ Employment Letter Agreement dated March 31,

2008, between John Donahoe and Registrant.

10-Q
8-K
S-1

000-24821
000-24821
333-59097

7/27/2005
12/20/2007
8/19/1998

10-K

000-24821

3/31/2003

S-1

333-59097

9/1/1998

8-K

8-K

8-K

8-K

000-24821

2/24/2005

000-24821

3/10/2005

000-24821

2/21/2006

000-24821

7/13/2006

10-Q/A

000-24821

4/24/2008

10-Q/A

000-24821

4/24/2008

10.32+ Employment Letter Agreement dated March 31,

10-Q/A

000-24821

4/24/2008

2008, between Rajiv Dutta and Registrant.

73

No.

Exhibit Description

Filed with
this 10-K

Incorporated by Reference

Form

File No.

Date Filed

10.33+ Offer Letter to Alan C. Marks dated March 27,

10-Q

000-24821

7/24/2008

10-Q

000-24821

10/23/2008

10-Q

000-24821

10/23/2008

8-K

000-24821

11/13/2006

8-K

000-24821

8/3/2007

10-Q

000-24821

10/23/2008

8-K

000-24821

10/1/2007

2008.

10.34+ Separation Agreement dated August 21, 2008
between Rajiv Dutta and Registrant.
10.35+ Letter Agreement dated September 30, 2008

10.36

10.37

10.38

10.39

12.01

21.01
23.01
24.01
31.01

31.02

32.01

32.02

between Robert Swan and Registrant.
Credit Agreement, dated as of November 7,
2006, by and among Registrant, Bank of
America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and the
other lenders named from time to time therein.
Amendment Agreement dated as of August 2,
2007, by and among Registrant, Bank of
America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and
other lenders named from time to time therein.
Second Amendment Agreement dated
September 5, 2008, by and among Registrant,
Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent,
and other lenders named from time to time
therein.
Form of Earn Out Settlement Agreement dated
as of September 28, 2007 among Registrant,
Skype Luxembourg Holdings S.a.r.l., Skype
Technologies S.A., Herho Holdings B.V. and
each Earn Out Seller.
Statement regarding computation of ratio of
earnings to fixed charges.
List of Subsidiaries.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP consent.
Power of Attorney (see signature page).
Certification of Registrant’s Chief Executive
Officer, as required by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification of Registrant’s Chief Financial
Officer, as required by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification of Registrant’s Chief Executive
Officer, as required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification of Registrant’s Chief Financial
Officer, as required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

X

X
X
X
X

X

X

X

+ Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement

(b) See the Exhibits listed under Item 15(a)(3) above.
(c) The financial statement schedules required by this item are listed under Item 15(a)(2) above.

74

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of eBay Inc.:

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(1) present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of eBay Inc. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2008 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under
Item 15(a)(2) presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction
with the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in
Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements and financial
statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial
statements, on the financial statement schedule, and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting
based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective
internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial
statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining
an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and
testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our
audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

As discussed in Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it

accounts for uncertainty in income taxes in 2007.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s
assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California
February 19, 2009

75

eBay Inc.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

December 31,
2007

December 31,
2008

(in thousands, except
par value amounts)

Current assets:

ASSETS

Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4,221,191
676,264
Short-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
480,557
Accounts receivable, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans receivable, net. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
1,513,578
Funds receivable and customer accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
230,915
Other current assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Intangible assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7,122,505
138,237
1,120,452
6,257,153
596,038
131,652

$ 3,188,928
163,734
435,197
570,071
1,467,962
460,698

6,286,590
106,178
1,198,714
7,025,398
736,134
239,425

Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $15,366,037

$15,592,439

Current liabilities:

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Funds payable and amounts due to customers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred revenue and customer advances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income taxes payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Borrowings under credit agreement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred and other tax liabilities, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

156,613
1,513,578
951,139
166,495
111,754
200,000

3,099,579
510,557
51,299

$

170,332
1,467,962
784,774
181,596
100,423
1,000,000

3,705,087
753,965
49,529

Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,661,435

4,508,581

Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
Stockholders’ equity:

Common stock, $0.001 par value; 3,580,000 shares authorized; 1,350,219 and
1,282,025 shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additional paid-in capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Treasury stock at cost, 107,522 and 188,200 shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated other comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,458
8,996,303
(3,184,981)
4,190,546
1,701,276

1,470
9,585,853
(5,376,970)
5,970,020
903,485

Total stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

11,704,602

11,083,858

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $15,366,037

$15,592,439

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

76

eBay Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME

Net revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $5,969,741
1,256,792
Cost of net revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Year Ended December 31,
2008
2007
2006
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
$7,672,329
1,762,972

$8,541,261
2,228,069

Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4,712,949

5,909,357

6,313,192

Operating expenses:

Sales and marketing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Product development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
General and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for transaction and loan losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of acquired intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restructuring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impairment of goodwill. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,587,133
494,695
744,363
266,724
197,078
—
—

1,882,810
619,727
904,681
293,917
204,104
—
1,390,938

1,881,551
725,600
998,871
347,453
234,916
49,119
—

Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,289,993

5,296,177

4,237,510

Income from operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest and other income, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,422,956
130,017
(5,916)

1,547,057
(421,418)

613,180
154,271
(16,600)

750,851
(402,600)

2,075,682
115,919
(8,037)

2,183,564
(404,090)

Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,125,639

$ 348,251

$1,779,474

Net income per share:

Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $

Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $

0.80

0.79

$

$

0.26

0.25

$

$

1.37

1.36

Weighted average shares:

Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,399,251

1,358,797

1,303,454

Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,425,472

1,376,174

1,312,608

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

77

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

eBay Inc.

Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,125,639

$1,779,474

2006

2008

Year Ended December 31,
2007
(in thousands)
$ 348,251

Other comprehensive income:

Foreign currency translation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges . . . . . . .
Estimated tax (provision)benefit on above items. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

588,150
8,327
(194)
(3,216)

645,202
589,566
(175)
(229,514)

(553,490)
(464,171)
40,522
179,348

Net change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) . . . .

593,067

1,005,079

(797,791)

Comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,718,706

$1,353,330

$ 981,683

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

78

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

eBay Inc.

2006

Year Ended December 31,
2007
(in thousands)

2008

Common stock:

Balance, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Common stock issued . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

1,412
19
1,431

$

1,431
27
1,458

1,458
12
1,470

Additional paid-in-capital:

Balance, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Common stock and stock based awards issued and assumed . .
Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock option income tax benefit (deficit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Structured stock repurchases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reclassification to additional paid-in-capital on adoption of

FAS 123(R) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Unearned stock-based compensation:

Balance, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reclassification to additional paid-in-capital on adoption of

FAS 123(R) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Treasury stock at cost:

7,272,742
331,899
326,616
148,565
—

(45,540)
8,034,282

(45,540)

45,540
—

8,034,282
517,288
306,453
130,667
7,613

—
8,996,303

—

—
—

8,996,303
227,222
358,354
(8,303)
12,277

—
9,585,853

—

—
—

Balance, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Common stock repurchased . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(274)
(1,669,154)
(1,669,428)

(1,669,428)
(1,515,553)
(3,184,981)

(3,184,981)
(2,191,989)
(5,376,970)

Retained earnings:

Balance, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cumulative effect of adoption of FIN 48 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,716,511
—
1,125,639
3,842,150

3,842,150
145
348,251
4,190,546

4,190,546
—
1,779,474
5,970,020

Accumulated other comprehensive income:

Balance, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments, net of

tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Change in unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges, net

103,130

696,197

1,701,276

5,033

360,047

(283,611)

of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign currency translation adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(116)
588,150
696,197
Total stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $10,904,632

(170)
645,202
1,701,276
$11,704,602

39,310
(553,490)
903,485
$11,083,858

Number of Shares:
Common stock:
Balance, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Common stock issued . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Common stock repurchased/forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,404,183
19,048
(54,719)
1,368,512

1,368,512
26,979
(45,272)
1,350,219

1,350,219
12,484
(80,678)
1,282,025

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

79

eBay Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

Cash flows from operating activities:

Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments:
Provision for transaction and loan losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impairment of goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax benefit from stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . .
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisition effects:

Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Funds receivable and customer accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other non-current assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Funds payable and amounts due to customers . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued expenses and other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred revenue and customer advances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income taxes payable and other tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash flows from investing activities:

Purchases of property and equipment, net. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Principal loans receivable, net of collections . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchases of investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Maturities and sales of investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash flows from financing activities:

Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Repurchases of common stock, net
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . .
Repayment of acquired line of credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net borrowings under credit agreement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash used in financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents . . .
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Supplemental cash flow disclosures:

2006

Year Ended December 31,
2007
(in thousands)

2008

$ 1,125,639

$

348,251

$ 1,779,474

266,724
544,552
—
317,410
(227,850)
148,565
(92,371)

(169,750)
(575,137)
(15,293)
14,737
32,986
575,137
(75,189)
47,859
329,772
2,247,791

(515,448)
—
(583,263)
1,380,227
(45,505)
(7,158)
228,853

293,917
601,621
1,390,938
301,813
(123,568)
143,203
(84,830)

(185,516)
(336,875)
(105,186)
(89,866)
36,954
336,875
(75,668)
37,807
151,459
2,641,329

(453,967)
—
(270,676)
888,757
(863,565)
6,305
(693,146)

313,482
(1,666,540)
92,371
—
—
(1,260,687)
133,255
1,349,212
1,313,580
$ 2,662,792

506,955
(1,485,397)
84,830
—
200,000
(693,612)
303,828
1,558,399
2,662,792
$ 4,221,191

347,453
719,814
—
353,323
(206,636)
40,891
(4,701)

(66,853)
45,617
(91,188)
8,158
14,946
(45,617)
(220,591)
10,350
197,555
2,881,995

(565,890)
(106,508)
(108,128)
136,200
(1,360,293)
(52,727)
(2,057,346)

135,141
(2,179,712)
4,701
(433,981)
800,000
(1,673,851)
(183,061)
(1,032,263)
4,221,191
$ 3,188,928

Cash paid for interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash paid for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

5,916
179,169

$

10,474
363,047

$

7,759
366,824

Non-cash investing and financing activities:

Common stock options assumed pursuant to acquisition . . . . . .
Common stock issued for acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—
18,436

10,361
—

92,092
—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

80

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

eBay Inc.

Note 1 — The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

The Company

eBay Inc. (“eBay”) was incorporated in California in May 1996, and reincorporated in Delaware in April 1998.
eBay’s purpose is to pioneer new communities around the world, built on commerce, sustained by trust, and inspired
by opportunity. eBay brings together millions of buyers and sellers every day on a local, national and international
basis through an array of websites. eBay provides online marketplaces for the sale of goods and services, online
payment services and online communication offerings to a diverse community of individuals and businesses.

We operate three primary business segments: Marketplaces, Payments and Communications. Our Market-
places segment provides the infrastructure to enable global online commerce on a variety of platforms, including the
traditional eBay.com platform, and our other online platforms, such as our online classifieds businesses, our
secondary tickets marketplace, StubHub, our online shopping comparison website, Shopping.com, our apartment
listing service platform, Rent.com, as well as our fixed price media marketplace (Half.com). Our Payments segment
is comprised of payment solutions PayPal (which enables individuals or businesses to securely, easily and quickly
send and receive payments online) and Bill Me Later (which we acquired in November 2008 and which enables
online U.S. merchants to offer, and U.S. consumers to obtain, transactional credit at the point of sale). Our
Communications segment, which consists of Skype, enables VoIP calls between Skype users and provides low-cost
connectivity to traditional fixed-line and mobile telephones.

When we refer to “we,” “our,” “us” or “eBay” in this document, we mean the current Delaware corporation

(eBay Inc.) and its California predecessor, as well as all of our consolidated subsidiaries.

Use of estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our
estimates, including those related to provisions for transaction and loan losses, legal contingencies, income taxes,
revenue recognition, stock-based compensation and the recoverability of goodwill and intangible assets. We base
our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the
circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Principles of consolidation and basis of presentation

The accompanying financial statements are consolidated and include the financial statements of eBay and our
majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.

The consolidated financial statements include 100% of the assets and liabilities of these majority-owned
subsidiaries and the ownership interests of minority investors are recorded as a minority interest. Investments in
private entities where we hold 20% or more but less than a 50% ownership interest are accounted for using the
equity method of accounting and the investment balance is included in long-term investments, while our share of the
investees’ results of operations is included in interest and other income, net. Investments in private entities where we
hold less than a 20% ownership interest and where we do not have the ability to significantly influence the
operations of the investee are accounted for using the cost method of accounting, where our share of the investees’
results of operations is not included in our consolidated statement of income, and our cost basis of our investments is
included in long-term investments.

Certain prior period balances have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. Customer
accounts were reclassified from “Other Current Assets” to “Funds Receivable and Customer Accounts.” Operating

81

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

eBay Inc.

expenses related to the provision for transaction losses, customer protection programs and bad debt expense have
been reclassified from “Sales and Marketing” and “General and Administrative” expenses to “Provision for
Transaction and Loan Losses.”

Derivative instruments

We use derivative financial instruments to manage exposures to foreign currency exchange rates and interest
rates. Our primary use of derivative instruments is through foreign exchange currency contracts to hedge foreign
currency risk. We also may use other derivative instruments not designated as hedges, such as forward contracts to
hedge foreign currency balance sheet exposures. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative
purposes. The assets or liabilities associated with our derivative instruments and hedging activities are recorded at
fair value in other current assets or other current liabilities, respectively, in our consolidated balance sheet. See
“Note 6 — Derivative Instruments” for a full description of our derivative financial instrument activities and related
accounting policies.

Concentrations of credit risk

Our cash, cash equivalents, accounts receivable, loans receivable and funds receivable are potentially subject
to concentration of credit risk. Cash and cash equivalents and funds receivable are placed with financial institutions
that management believes are of high credit quality. Our accounts receivable are derived from revenue earned from
customers located in the U.S. and internationally. Our loans receivable are derived from consumer financing
activities for customers located in the U.S. We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, authorized
credits and loans receivable based upon our historical experience, the age and delinquency rates of receivables and
the credit quality of the relevant loan, as well as economic and regulatory conditions. Determining appropriate
allowances for these losses is an inherently uncertain process, and ultimate losses may vary from the current
estimates, resulting in a material impact to future statements of income or cash flows. Due to the relatively small
dollar amount of individual accounts receivable and loans receivable, we generally do not require collateral on these
balances. The allowance for doubtful accounts and authorized credits was $96.2 million and $104.9 million at
December 31, 2007 and 2008, respectively. The allowance for loans receivable was $48.1 million at December 31,
2008.

During the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007, and 2008, no customers accounted for more than 10% of net
revenues. As of December 31, 2007 and 2008, no customers accounted for more than 10% of net accounts
receivable or net loans receivable.

Provision for transaction and loan losses

We are exposed to losses due to uncollectible receivable and loan accounts, credit card and other payment
misuse, as well as non-performance of and credit losses from sellers who accept payment through PayPal.
Provisions for these items represent our estimate of actual losses based on our historical experience, actuarial
techniques, the age and delinquency rates of receivables and the credit quality of the relevant loan, as well as
economic and regulatory conditions.

Foreign currency

Most of our foreign subsidiaries use the local currency of their respective countries as their functional currency.
Assets and liabilities are translated at exchange rates prevailing at the balance sheet dates. Revenues, costs and
expenses are translated into U.S. dollars at average exchange rates for the period. Gains and losses resulting from
the translation of our consolidated balance sheet are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive
income.

Realized gains and losses from foreign currency transactions are recognized as interest and other income, net.

82

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

eBay Inc.

Loans receivable, net

Loans receivable represent extensions of credit to individual consumers to purchase goods and services
through our Bill Me Later merchant network. The terms of the consumer relationship require us to submit monthly
bills to the consumer detailing loan repayment requirements. The terms also allow us to charge the consumer, in
certain circumstances, interest and fees. Loans receivable are reported at their outstanding principal balances, net of
deferred origination costs and net of allowance, and include the estimated collectible interest and fees. We charge
off loans receivable in the month in which the customer becomes 180 days past due. Bankrupt accounts are charged
off within 60 days of receiving notification from the bankruptcy courts.

Funds receivable and funds payable

Funds receivable and payable relate to our Payments segment and arise due to the time taken to clear
transactions through external payment networks. When customers fund their account using their bank account or
credit card, or withdraw money to their bank account or through a debit card transaction, there is a clearing period
before the cash is received or settled, usually one to three business days for U.S. transactions, and up to five business
days for international transactions. Hence, these funds are treated as a receivable or payable, as the case may be,
until the cash is settled.

Customer accounts

Based on differences in regulatory requirements and commercial law in the jurisdictions where PayPal
operates, PayPal holds customer balances either as direct claims against PayPal or as an agent or custodian on behalf
of PayPal’s customers. Customer balances held as direct claims against PayPal are included on our consolidated
balance sheet as funds receivable and customer accounts with an offsetting current liability in funds payable and
amounts due to customers. The customer balances can be invested only in specified types of liquid assets.

Customer funds held by PayPal as an agent or custodian on behalf of our customers are not reflected in our
consolidated balance sheet. These off-balance sheet funds totaled approximately $1.8 billion and $1.9 billion as of
December 31, 2007 and 2008, respectively. These off-balance sheet funds include funds held in the U.S. that are
deposited in bank accounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and funds that customers choose
to invest in the PayPal Money Market Fund. The PayPal Money Market Fund is invested in a portfolio managed by
Barclays Global Fund Advisors.

Property and equipment

Property and equipment are stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation and amor-
tization are computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally, one to
three years for computer equipment and software, up to 30 years for buildings and building improvements, ten years
for aviation equipment, the shorter of five years or the term of the lease for leasehold improvements, three years for
furniture and fixtures and three years for vehicles.

Goodwill and intangible assets

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable
intangible assets acquired in a business combination. Intangible assets resulting from the acquisitions of entities
accounted for using the purchase method of accounting are estimated by management based on the fair value of
assets received. Identifiable intangible assets are comprised of purchased customer lists and user base, trademarks
and trade names, developed technologies, and other intangible assets. Identifiable intangible assets are amortized
over the period of estimated benefit using the straight-line method and estimated useful lives ranging from one to
eight years. Goodwill is not subject to amortization, but is subject to at least an annual assessment for impairment,
applying a fair-value based test.

83

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

eBay Inc.

We evaluate goodwill, at a minimum, on an annual basis and whenever events and changes in circumstances
suggest that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Impairment of goodwill is tested at the reporting unit level
by comparing the reporting unit’s carrying amount, including goodwill, to the fair value of the reporting unit. The
fair values of the reporting units are estimated using an income and discounted cash flow approach. If the carrying
amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, goodwill is considered impaired and a second step is performed
to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any.

Impairment of long-lived assets

We evaluate long-lived assets (including intangible assets) for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a long-lived asset may not be recoverable. An asset is considered
impaired if its carrying amount exceeds the future net cash flow the asset is expected to generate. If an asset is
considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds its fair market value. We assess the recoverability of our long-lived and intangible assets
by determining whether the unamortized balances can be recovered through undiscounted future net cash flows of
the related assets. The amount of impairment, if any, is measured using fair market values which are estimated based
on projected discounted future net cash flows.

Revenue recognition

Revenues are recognized when evidence of an arrangement exists, the fee is fixed and determinable, no
significant obligation remains and collection of the receivable is reasonably assured. When a revenue agreement
involves multiple elements, such as sales of various services in one arrangement or potentially multiple arrange-
ments, the entire fee from the arrangement is allocated to each respective element based on its relative fair value and
recognized when the revenue recognition criteria for each element is met. In the absence of fair value for a delivered
element, we first allocate revenue to the fair value of the undelivered elements and the residual revenue to the
delivered elements. Where the fair value for an undelivered element cannot be determined, we defer revenue
recognition for the delivered elements until the undelivered elements are delivered or the fair value is determinable.
We evaluate whether payments made to customers or revenues earned from vendors have a separate identifiable
benefit and whether they are fairly valued in determining the appropriate classification of the related revenues and
expense.

Our Marketplaces segment generates net transaction revenues primarily from listing and final value fees paid
by sellers. Listing fee revenues are recognized ratably over the estimated period of the listing, while revenues
related to final value fees are recognized at the time that the transaction is successfully concluded. A transaction is
considered successfully concluded when at least one buyer has bid above the seller’s specified minimum price or
reserve price, whichever is higher, at the end of the transaction term.

Our Payments segment earns transaction revenues primarily from processing transactions for certain cus-
tomers. Revenues resulting from a payment processing transaction are recognized once the transaction is complete.

Our Communications segment transaction revenues are generated primarily from fees charged to users to
connect Skype’s VoIP product to traditional telecommunication networks. These fees are recognized when the
service is provided. The majority of Communications segment transaction revenues are prepaid. We record
customer advances for prepaid amounts in excess of revenues recognized as a current liability.

Our marketing services and other revenues, included in all of our segments, are derived principally from the
sale of advertisements, revenue sharing arrangements, classifieds fees, lead referral fees and other revenues. Our
advertising revenues are derived principally from the sale of online advertisements. To date, the duration of our
advertising contracts has ranged from one week to five years, but is generally one week to one year. Advertising
revenues on contracts are recognized as “impressions” (i.e., the number of times that an advertisement appears in
pages viewed by users of our websites) are delivered; as “clicks” (which are generated each time users on our

84

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

eBay Inc.

websites click through our text-based advertisements to an advertiser’s designated website) are provided to
advertisers; or ratably over the term of the agreement where such agreements provide for minimum monthly or
quarterly advertising commitments or where such commitments are fixed throughout the term. Revenues related to
revenue sharing arrangements are recognized based on revenue reports received from our partners, provided that
collectibility is reasonably assured. Revenues related to classified fees are fees for listing items on our classified
websites and are recognized over the estimated period of the classified listing. Lead referral fee revenue is generated
from lead referral fees based on the number of times a user clicks through to a merchant’s website from our
websites. Lead referral fees are recognized in the period in which the user clicks through to the merchant’s website.

Other revenues are derived principally from contractual arrangements with third parties that provide services
to eBay and PayPal users and interest earned from banks on certain PayPal customer account balances and interest
and fees earned on the Bill Me Later loan portfolio. Revenues from contractual arrangements with third parties are
recognized as the contracted services are delivered to end users. Revenues from interest income are recognized
when earned. Interest and fees earned on the Bill Me Later loan portfolio are computed and recognized based on the
amount of loans outstanding and their contractual interest and fee rates.

To drive traffic to our websites, we periodically provide incentives to our users such as percentage discounts

off current purchases. The incentives used by our users are reported as a reduction of revenue.

Product development costs

Costs related to the planning and post implementation phases of our website development efforts are recorded
as an operating expense. Direct costs incurred in the development phase are capitalized and amortized over the
product’s estimated useful life of one to three years as charges to cost of net revenues. During the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008, we capitalized $67.9 million (including $8.8 million of stock-based
compensation), $110.6 million (including $8.4 million of stock-based compensation) and $112.7 million (including
$10.6 million of stock-based compensation) of software development costs, respectively, the majority of which
relates to site and other product development efforts.

Advertising expense

We expense the costs of producing advertisements at the time production occurs and expense the cost of
communicating advertising in the period during which the advertising space or airtime is used as sales and
marketing expense. Internet advertising expenses are recognized based on the terms of the individual agreements,
which is generally over the greater of the ratio of the number of impressions delivered over the total number of
contracted impressions, pay-per-click, or on a straight-line basis over the term of the contract. Advertising expense
totaled $871.0 million, $1.0 billion and $923.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008,
respectively.

Stock-based compensation

We adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share Based
Payment” (FAS 123(R)) using the modified prospective transition method beginning January 1, 2006. Accordingly,
during 2006, 2007 and 2008, we recorded stock-based compensation expense for awards granted prior to, but not yet
vested, as of January 1, 2006, as if the fair value method required for pro forma disclosure under FAS 123 were in
effect for expense recognition purposes, adjusted for estimated forfeitures. For these awards, we have continued to
recognize compensation expense using the accelerated amortization method under Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) Interpretation 28 “Accounting for Stock Appreciation Rights and Other Variable Stock Option or
Award Plans” (FIN 28). For stock-based awards granted after January 1, 2006, we have recognized compensation
expense based on the estimated grant date fair value method using the Black-Scholes valuation model. For these
awards, we have recognized compensation expense using a straight-line amortization method. As FAS 123(R)
requires that stock-based compensation expense be based on awards that are ultimately expected to vest.

85

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

eBay Inc.

Accordingly, stock-based compensation for 2006, 2007 and 2008 has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. When
estimating forfeitures, we consider voluntary termination behaviors as well as trends of actual option forfeitures.
We recognize a benefit from stock-based compensation in equity if an incremental tax benefit is realized by
following the ordering provisions of the tax law. In addition, we account for the indirect effects of stock-based
compensation on the research tax credit and the foreign tax credit through the income statement.

Income taxes

We account for income taxes using an asset and liability approach, which requires the recognition of taxes
payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax consequences of
events that have been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns. The measurement of current and
deferred tax assets and liabilities is based on provisions of enacted tax laws; the effects of future changes in tax laws
or rates are not anticipated. If necessary, the measurement of deferred tax assets is reduced by the amount of any tax
benefits that are not expected to be realized based on available evidence.

We account for uncertain tax positions in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (FIN 48). Accordingly, we report a liability for unrecognized tax benefits resulting
from uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. We recognize interest and penalties, if any,
related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.

Recent accounting pronouncements

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (FAS) No. 141 (Revised
2007), “Business Combinations” (FAS 141(R)). FAS 141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how an
acquirer in a business combination recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets
acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree, as well as the goodwill acquired.
Significant changes from current practice resulting from FAS 141(R) include the expansion of the definitions of a
“business” and a “business combination.” For all business combinations (whether partial, full or step acquisitions),
the acquirer will record 100% of all assets and liabilities of the acquired business, including goodwill, generally at
their fair values; contingent consideration will be recognized at its fair value on the acquisition date and, for certain
arrangements, changes in fair value will be recognized in earnings until settlement; and acquisition-related
transaction and restructuring costs will be expensed rather than treated as part of the cost of the acquisition.
FAS 141(R) also establishes disclosure requirements to enable users to evaluate the nature and financial effects of
the business combination. FAS 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition
date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008.
FAS 141(R) may have an impact on our consolidated financial statements. The nature and magnitude of the specific
impact will depend upon the nature, terms, and size of the acquisitions consummated after the effective date.

In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements — An amendment of ARB No. 51” (FAS 160). FAS 160 amends Accounting Research Bulletin 51,
“Consolidated Financial Statements,” to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest
in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary,
which is sometimes referred to as minority interest, is a third-party ownership interest in the consolidated entity that
should be reported as a component of equity in the consolidated financial statements. Among other requirements,
FAS 160 requires the consolidated statement of income to be reported at amounts that include the amounts
attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest. FAS 160 also requires disclosure on the face of the
consolidated statement of income of the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the
noncontrolling interest. FAS 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning
on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is not permitted. We do not believe the adoption of FAS 160 will
have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

86

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

eBay Inc.

In February 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 157-2 (FSP 157-2), which delays the effective date of
FAS 157 one year for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those recognized or disclosed at fair
value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. FSP 157-2 is effective for us beginning January 1, 2009. We do
not believe the adoption of FSP 157-2 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2008, the FASB issued FAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities” (FAS 161). FAS 161 amends and expands the disclosure requirements of FAS 133, “Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” and requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies
for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of gains and losses on derivative instru-
ments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. This statement is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal periods beginning after November 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is
not permitted. We do not believe the adoption of FAS 161 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.

In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FAS 142-3, “Determination of Useful Life of Intangible
Assets” (FSP 142-3). FSP 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing the renewal or
extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FAS 142, “Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets.” FSP 142-3 also requires expanded disclosure regarding the determination of
intangible asset useful lives. FSP 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Earlier
adoption is not permitted. We do not believe the adoption of FSP 142-3 will have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.

Note 2 — Net Income Per Share:

Basic net income per share is computed by dividing the net income for the period by the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is computed by dividing the
net income for the period by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially dilutive
common stock outstanding during the period. The dilutive effect of outstanding options and restricted stock is
reflected in diluted earnings per share by application of the treasury stock method. The calculation of diluted net
income per share excludes all anti-dilutive shares. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and
diluted net income per share for the periods indicated (in thousands, except per share amounts):

Year Ended December 31,
2007

2008

2006

Numerator:

Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,125,639

$ 348,251

$1,779,474

Denominator:

Weighted average common shares — basic . . . . . . . . . .
Dilutive effect of equity incentive plans . . . . . . . . . . .

1,399,251
26,221

1,358,797
17,377

1,303,454
9,154

Weighted average common shares — diluted . . . . . . . . .

1,425,472

1,376,174

1,312,608

Net income per share:

Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $

Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $

0.80

0.79

$

$

0.26

0.25

$

$

1.37

1.36

Common stock equivalents excluded from income per
diluted share because their effect would have been
anti-dilutive . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

73,651

83,422

102,642

87

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

eBay Inc.

Note 3 — Business Combinations, Goodwill and Intangible Assets:

Our acquisitions in 2008, 2007 and 2006 with aggregate purchase prices in excess of $100 million were as

follows:

Bill Me Later, Inc.

On November 7, 2008 we acquired all the outstanding shares of Bill Me Later, Inc. (Bill Me Later) for a total
purchase price of approximately $914.6 million. The purchase price consisted of cash totaling $817.0 million,
$9.9 million in estimated acquisition-related expenses and the assumption of Bill Me Later’s outstanding common
stock options, valued at approximately $87.7 million. The fair value of Bill Me Later’s stock options assumed was
determined using a Black-Scholes model. Bill Me Later is a payments solution company that provides transactional
credit at the point of sale for ecommerce transactions and is included in our Payments segment. Bill Me Later’s
service combines authentication, credit origination, funding, fulfillment, settlement, reporting and customer care
into a single managed solution integrated into a merchant’s existing payment platform. The rationale for acquiring
Bill Me Later is to enhance our leadership position in online payment solutions.

The purchase price was allocated to the tangible assets and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed
based on their estimated fair values on the acquisition date. The fair value assigned to identifiable intangible assets
acquired is determined using the income approach, which discounts expected future cash flows to present value
using estimates and assumptions determined by management. Purchased identifiable intangible assets are amor-
tized on a straight-line basis over the respective useful lives. Our preliminary allocation of the purchase price is
summarized below (in thousands):

Net assets acquired, including cash acquired of $33,735 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 26,097
688,908
Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
13,500
Trade name . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
137,700
User base . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
38,000
Developed technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10,400
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $914,605

Our estimated useful life of the identifiable intangible assets acquired is three years for the developed
technology and five years for the trade name and user base. The allocation of the purchase price for the acquisition
has been prepared on a preliminary basis and changes to that allocation may occur as additional information
becomes available.

The results of operations of Bill Me Later for periods prior to our acquisition were not material to our

consolidated statement of income and, accordingly, pro forma results of operations have not been presented.

Den Bla˚ Avis and BilBasen

On October 6, 2008 we acquired all the outstanding shares of Den Bla˚ Avis and BilBasen for a total purchase
price of approximately $394.1 million. The purchase price consisted of cash totaling $392.0 million and $2.1 million
in estimated acquisition-related expenses. Den Bla˚ Avis and BilBasen are two leading online classifieds sites in
Denmark and are included in our Marketplaces segment. The rationale for acquiring Den Bla˚ Avis and BilBasen is
to further strengthen our leadership position in global classifieds.

The purchase price was allocated to the tangible assets and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed
based on their estimated fair values on the acquisition date. The fair value assigned to identifiable intangible assets
acquired is determined using the income approach, which discounts expected future cash flows to present value
using estimates and assumptions determined by management. Purchased identifiable intangible assets are

88

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

eBay Inc.

amortized on a straight-line basis over the respective useful lives. Our preliminary allocation of the purchase price is
summarized below (in thousands):

Net liabilities assumed, net of cash acquired of $3,957 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (31,612)
281,610
Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
74,100
Trade name . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
56,800
User base . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
13,200
Developed technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $394,098

Our estimated economic life of the identifiable intangible assets acquired is three years for the developed
technology and five years for the trade name and user base. The allocation of the purchase price for the acquisition
has been prepared on a preliminary basis and changes to that allocation may occur as additional information
becomes available.

The results of operations of Den Bla˚ Avis and BilBasen for periods prior to our acquisition were not material to
our consolidated statement of income and, accordingly, pro forma results of operations have not been presented.

Fraud Sciences Ltd.

On January 30, 2008, we acquired all of the outstanding shares of Fraud Sciences Ltd. (“Fraud Sciences”) for a
total aggregate purchase price of approximately $153.6 million. The purchase price consisted of cash totaling
$148.3 million, $0.9 million in estimated acquisition-related expenses and the assumption of Fraud Sciences’
outstanding common stock options, valued at approximately $4.4 million. The fair value of Fraud Sciences’ stock
options assumed was determined using a Black-Scholes model. Fraud Sciences provides online risk management
tools and is included within our Payments segment. The rationale for acquiring Fraud Sciences is to enhance
PayPal’s proprietary fraud management systems and accelerate our development of next generation fraud detection
tools.

The purchase price was allocated to the tangible assets and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed
based on their estimated fair values on the acquisition date. The excess of the purchase price over the aggregate fair
values was recorded as goodwill. The fair value assigned to identifiable intangible assets acquired is determined
using the income approach, which discounts expected future cash flows to present value using estimates and
assumptions determined by management. Purchased intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over the
respective useful lives. Our allocation of the purchase price is summarized below (in thousands):

Net liabilities assumed, net of cash acquired of $198 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (5,117)
135,477
Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
23,200
Developed technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $153,560

Our estimated useful life of the identifiable intangible assets is two years for the developed technology.

The results of operations of Fraud Sciences for periods prior to our acquisition were not material to our

consolidated statement of income and, accordingly, pro forma results of operations have not been presented.

StubHub, Inc.

On February 13, 2007, we acquired all of the outstanding shares of StubHub, Inc. (“StubHub”) for a total
purchase price of $292.4 million. The purchase price was comprised of cash totaling $283.2 million, $1.1 million in
estimated acquisition-related expenses and the assumption of StubHub’s outstanding common stock options, valued

89

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

eBay Inc.

at approximately $8.1 million. The fair value of StubHub stock options assumed was determined using a Black-
Scholes model. StubHub is an online marketplace that facilitates the resale of event tickets and is included within
our Marketplaces segment.

The purchase price was allocated to the tangible assets, liabilities assumed, and identifiable intangible assets
acquired based on their estimated fair values on the acquisition date. The excess of the purchase price over the
aggregate fair values was recorded as goodwill. The fair value assigned to identifiable intangible assets acquired is
determined using the income approach, which discounts expected future cash flows to present value using estimates
and assumptions determined by management. Purchased intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis
over the respective useful lives. Our allocation of the purchase price is summarized below (in thousands):

Net liabilities assumed, net of cash of $25,780 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (15,663)
221,604
Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
44,400
Trade name . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
29,000
User base . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
13,100
Developed technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $292,441

Our estimated useful lives of the identifiable intangible assets acquired are three years for the trade name and

developed technology and five years for the user base.

The results of operations of StubHub for periods prior to our acquisition were not material to our consolidated

statement of income and, accordingly, pro forma results of operations have not been presented.

Goodwill

Goodwill information for each reportable segment is as follows (in thousands):

December 31,
2007

Goodwill
Acquired

Adjustments

December 31,
2008

Reportable segments:

Marketplaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Communications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$3,016,799
1,348,373
1,919,341

$ 292,085
824,385
—

$(255,745)
(9,701)
(82,779)

$3,053,139
2,163,057
1,836,562

$6,284,513

$1,116,470

$(348,225)

$7,052,758

Investments accounted for under the equity method of accounting are classified on our balance sheet as long-
term investments. Such investments include any related identifiable intangible assets, deferred tax liabilities and
goodwill. Goodwill related to our equity method investments, included in the table above, was approximately
$27.4 million as of December 31, 2007 and 2008.

The changes in goodwill during the year ended December 31, 2008 were primarily due to the recording of

goodwill for new acquisitions and foreign currency translation adjustments.

We conducted our annual impairment test of goodwill as of August 31, 2008 and determined that no
adjustment to the carrying value of goodwill for any reportable units was necessary. As of December 31, 2008, we
determined that no events or circumstances from August 31, 2008 through December 31, 2008 indicate that a further
assessment was necessary.

We conducted our annual impairment test of goodwill as of August 31, 2007 and concluded that the carrying
amount of our Communications reporting unit exceeded its fair value and recorded an impairment charge of
approximately $1.4 billion during the year ended December 31, 2007. The impairment charge included the impact

90

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

eBay Inc.

of the Skype earn out settlement payment and was determined by comparing the carrying value of goodwill in our
Communications reporting unit with the implied fair value of the goodwill. We determined the fair value of the
Communications reporting unit using the income approach, which requires estimates of future operating results and
cash flows discounted using an estimated discount rate. Our estimates resulted from an updated long-term financial
outlook developed as part of our strategic planning cycle conducted annually during our third quarter. Our estimates
of future operating results for our Communications reporting unit are for an early stage business with limited
financial history, as well as developing revenue models. These factors increase the risk of differences between
projected and actual performance that could impact future estimates of fair value of the Communications reporting
unit.

Intangible Assets

The components of acquired identifiable intangible assets are as follows (in thousands):

December 31, 2007

Gross
Carrying
Amount

Accumulated
Amortization

Net
Carrying
Amount

Weighted
Average Useful
Life
(years)

December 31, 2008

Gross
Carrying
Amount

Accumulated
Amortization

Net
Carrying
Amount

Weighted
Average Useful
Life
(years)

Intangible assets:

Customer lists and user

base . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 588,714

$(334,864)

$253,850

Trademarks and trade

names . . . . . . . . . .

572,918

(292,854)

280,064

Developed

technologies . . . . . .

All other . . . . . . . . . . . .

125,504

62,052

(85,441)

(38,546)

40,063

23,506

6

5

4

4

$ 756,829

$(415,238)

$341,591

638,930

(393,353)

245,577

199,893

126,381

(111,973)

(64,803)

87,920

61,578

6

5

3

4

$1,349,188

$(751,705)

$597,483

$1,722,033

$(985,367)

$736,666

All of our acquired identifiable intangible assets are subject to amortization. Acquired identifiable intangible
assets are comprised of customer lists and user base, trademarks and trade names, developed technologies, and other
acquired intangible assets including patents and contractual agreements. No significant residual value is estimated
for the intangible assets. The increase in intangible assets during the year ended December 31, 2008 resulted
primarily from certain intangible assets acquired as part of our acquisition of the outstanding shares of Bill Me
Later, Den Bla˚ Avis and BilBasen, and Fraud Sciences as well as other acquisitions completed during the year. The
net carrying amount of intangible assets related to our equity investments, included in the table above, totaled
approximately $1.4 million and $0.5 million, as of December 31, 2007 and 2008, respectively. Aggregate
amortization expense for intangible assets totaled $220.0 million, $229.2 million and $281.6 million for the years
ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008, respectively. Included in amortization of intangibles for the year ended
December 31, 2008, is a charge of $9.0 million for in-process research and development related to an asset purchase
completed during the period.

91

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

eBay Inc.

Expected future intangible asset amortization from acquisitions completed as of December 31, 2008 is as

follows (in thousands):

Fiscal Years:

2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $310,772
208,681
2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
101,946
2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
68,335
2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
46,932
2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
Thereafter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$736,666

Note 4 — Segments:

Operating segments are based upon our internal organization structure, the manner in which our operations are
managed, the criteria used by our Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) to evaluate segment performance and
the availability of separate financial information. We have three operating segments: Marketplaces, Payments and
Communications.

The following table summarizes the financial performance of our operating segments (in thousands):

Net revenues from external customers . . . . . . . . .
Direct costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$4,334,290
2,503,961

$1,440,530
1,102,919

$194,921
221,819

Marketplaces

Year Ended December 31, 2006
Payments

Communications

Consolidated

$5,969,741
3,828,699

Direct contribution. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,830,329

337,611

(26,898)

2,141,042

Operating expenses and indirect costs of net

revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Income from operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest and other income, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Net revenues from external customers . . . . . . . . .
Direct costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$5,363,891
3,017,895

$1,926,616
1,534,627

Direct contribution. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,345,996

391,989

$381,822
337,338

44,484

Marketplaces

Year Ended December 31, 2007
Payments

Communications

Operating expenses and indirect costs of net

revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Income from operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest and other income, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

92

718,086

1,422,956
130,017
(5,916)

$1,547,057

Consolidated

$7,672,329
4,889,860

2,782,469

2,169,289

613,180
154,271
(16,600)

$ 750,851

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

eBay Inc.

Net revenues from external customers . . . . . . . . .
Direct costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$5,586,751
3,135,611

$2,403,669
1,922,897

Direct contribution. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,451,140

480,772

$550,841
434,588

116,253

Marketplaces

Year Ended December 31, 2008
Payments

Communications

Operating expenses and indirect costs of net

revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Income from operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest and other income, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Consolidated

$8,541,261
5,493,096

3,048,165

972,483

2,075,682
115,919
(8,037)

$2,183,564

Direct contribution consists of net revenues from external customers less direct costs. Direct costs include
specific costs of net revenues, sales and marketing expenses, and general and administrative expenses, such as
advertising and marketing programs, customer support expenses, bank charges, Bill Me Later related interest
charges, site operations expenses, product development expenses, billing operations, certain technology and
facilities expenses, transaction expenses and provision for transaction and loan losses. Expenses such as our
corporate center costs (consisting of certain costs such as corporate management, human resources, finance and
legal), amortization of intangible assets, stock-based compensation expense and impairment of goodwill, are
excluded from direct costs as they are not included in the measurement of segment performance.

The following tables summarize the allocation of net revenues and the long-lived assets based on geography (in

thousands):

U.S.
Germany . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
United Kingdom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rest of world . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3,108,986
895,993
778,185
1,186,577

2006

December 31,
2007

$3,742,670
1,030,165
1,074,486
1,825,008

2008

$3,969,466
1,220,691
1,072,863
2,278,241

Total net revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $5,969,741

$7,672,329

$8,541,261

December 31,

2007

2008

U.S.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
International . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,018,645
142,537

$1,103,243
170,382

Total long-lived tangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,161,182

$1,273,625

Net revenues are attributed to U.S. and international geographies primarily based upon the country in which
the seller, payment recipient, customer, Skype user’s Internet protocol address, online property that generates
advertising, or other service provider, as the case may be, is located. Long-lived assets attributed to the U.S. and
international geographies are based upon the country in which the asset is located or owned.

Note 5 — Investments:

Short and long-term investments, which include marketable equity securities and government and corporate
bonds, are classified as available-for-sale and reported at fair value using the specific identification method.
Unrealized gains and losses are excluded from earnings and reported as a component of other comprehensive

93

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

eBay Inc.

income (loss), net of related estimated tax provisions or benefits. Additionally, we assess whether an other-than-
temporary impairment loss on our investments has occurred due to declines in fair value or other market conditions.
Declines in fair value that are considered other than temporary are recorded as an impairment of investments in the
consolidated statement of income. We did not recognize an other-than-temporary impairment loss on our
investments in 2008. At December 31, 2007 and 2008, short and long-term investments, are reported at fair
value as follows (in thousands):

Gross
Amortized
Cost

December 31, 2007
Gross
Gross
Unrealized
Unrealized
Losses
Gains

Short-term investments:

Restricted cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Government and agency securities . . . . . . . . . . .
Time deposits and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity instruments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$17,401
37,802
1,025
22,428
8,507

$

9
—
2
—
589,734

Long-term investments:

Restricted cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$87,163

$589,745

$ 8,852
16,465

$25,317

$

$

—
5

5

$ —
(644)
—
—
—

$(644)

$ —
(8)

$ (8)

Gross
Amortized
Cost

December 31, 2008
Gross
Gross
Unrealized
Unrealized
Losses
Gains

Short-term investments:

Restricted cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Time deposits and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity instruments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$21,258
5,000
4,129
8,507

$

—
—
—
124,842

Long-term investments:

Restricted cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Time deposits and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$38,894

$124,842

$ 5,461
52

$ 5,513

$

$

—
—

—

$—
(2)
—
—

$ (2)

$—
—

$—

Estimated
Fair Value

$ 17,410
37,158
1,027
22,428
598,241

$676,264

$

8,852
16,462

$ 25,314

Estimated
Fair Value

$ 21,258
4,998
4,129
133,349

$163,734

$

5,461
52

$

5,513

As of December 31, 2008, we expect to realize the full value of our corporate debt security investment which
has remaining term of approximately two months. Restricted cash is held primarily in money market funds and
interest bearing accounts for letters of credit related primarily to various lease arrangements.

Effective during 2007, we began to account for our investment in MercadoLibre as an available-for-sale
marketable equity security due to MercadoLibre’s initial public offering of its common stock in August of 2007. As
of December 31, 2008, our investment was recorded at fair value and reported as a short-term investment with
unrealized gains, net of tax, excluded from earnings and reported as a component of accumulated other compre-
hensive income.

94

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

eBay Inc.

Equity and cost method investments

We have certain investments accounted for using the equity and cost methods of accounting totaling
$112.9 million in 2007 and $100.7 million in 2008. The total of these investments, including identifiable intangible
assets, deferred tax liabilities and goodwill, are classified on our balance sheet as long-term investments. Our
consolidated results of operations include, as a component of other income, our share of the net income or loss of the
equity method investments together with amortization expense relating to acquired intangible assets. Our share of
the results of investees’ results of operations is not significant for any period presented.

Note 6 — Derivative Instruments:

We recognize all derivative instruments on the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in the fair value (i.e., gains
or losses) of the derivatives are recorded each period in the consolidated statement of income or accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss). For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the
effective portion of the derivative’s gain or loss is initially reported as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) and subsequently reclassified into the financial statements line item in which the
hedged item is recorded in the same period the forecasted transaction affects earnings.

Transaction Exposure

As of December 31, 2008, we had outstanding foreign exchange hedge contracts with notional values
equivalent to approximately $132.4 million with maturity dates within 34 days. The hedge contracts are used to
offset changes in the value of assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies which differ from the
functional currency of the entity. Transaction gains and losses on the contracts and the assets and liabilities are
recognized each period in interest and other income, net.

Translation Exposure

We consolidate the earnings of our international subsidiaries by converting them into U.S. dollars in
accordance with Financial Accounting Standards No. 52 “Foreign Currency Translation” (“FAS 52”). Such
earnings will fluctuate when there is a change in foreign currency exchange rates. We enter into transactions
to hedge portions of our foreign currency denominated earnings translation exposure using foreign exchange
contracts. All contracts that hedge translation exposure mature ratably over the quarter in which they are executed.
Unrealized translation gains and losses are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, the realized gains related to these hedges was approximately
$26.3 million. During the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007, the realized gains and losses related to
these hedges were not significant.

Economic Exposure

We transact business in various foreign currencies and have significant international revenues as well as costs
denominated in foreign currencies, subjecting us to foreign currency risk. In addition, we charge our international
subsidiaries on a monthly basis for their use of intellectual property and technology and for certain corporate
services provided by eBay and PayPal in the U.S. These charges are denominated in Euros and these forecasted
inter-company transactions represent a foreign currency cash flow exposure. We purchase foreign currency
exchange contracts, generally with maturities of 12 months or less, to reduce the volatility of cash flows primarily
related to forecasted revenue and intercompany transactions denominated in certain foreign currencies. The
objective of the foreign exchange contracts is to better ensure that the U.S. dollar-equivalent cash flows are not
adversely affected by changes in the U.S. dollar/foreign currency exchange rate. We expect the hedge of certain of
these forecasted transactions to be highly effective in offsetting potential changes in cash flows attributed to a
change in the U.S. dollar/foreign currency exchange rate. Accordingly, we record as a component of accumulated
other comprehensive income all unrealized gains and losses related to the foreign exchange contracts that receive

95

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

eBay Inc.

hedge accounting treatment. During the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007, the realized gains and losses
related to these hedges were not significant. During the year ended December 31, 2008 the realized gains on these
hedges were $17.1 million. The notional amount of our economic hedges receiving cash flow hedge accounting
treatment was $428.9 million as of December 31, 2008. The gains, net of losses, recorded to accumulated other
comprehensive income as of December 31, 2008 were $40.5 million. Amounts included in accumulated other
comprehensive income at December 31, 2008 will be subsequently reclassified into the financial statements line
item in which the hedged item is recorded in the same period the forecasted transaction affects earnings.

Note 7 — Fair Value Measurement of Assets and Liabilities

The following table summarizes our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis

as of December 31, 2008 (in thousands):

Description

Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents:

Balance as of
December 31,
2008

Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1)

Significant Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)

Bank deposits and money market funds . . . . . . .

$3,188,928

$3,188,928

$ —

Total cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,188,928

3,188,928

—

Short-term investments:

Restricted cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity instruments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Time deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total short-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Derivatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term restricted cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term time deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

21,258
133,349
4,129
4,998

163,734

71,149
5,461
52

21,258
133,349
—
—

154,607

—
5,461
—

—
—
4,129
4,998

9,127

71,149
—
52

Total financial assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$3,429,324

$3,348,996

$80,328

Liabilities:
Derivatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

13,154

$

—

$13,154

Our financial assets and liabilities are valued using market prices on both active markets (level 1) and less
active markets (level 2). Level 1 instrument valuations are obtained from real-time quotes for transactions in active
exchange markets involving identical assets. Level 2 instrument valuations are obtained from readily-available
pricing sources for comparable instruments. As of December 31, 2008, we did not have any assets or liabilities
without observable market values that would require a high level of judgment to determine fair value (level 3
assets). Our derivative instruments are valued using pricing models that take into account the contract terms as well
as multiple inputs where applicable, such as equity prices, interest rate yield curves, option volatility and currency
rates. Our derivative instruments are short-term in nature, typically one month to one year in duration. Cash and cash
equivalents are short-term, highly liquid investments with original or remaining maturities of three months or less
when purchased.

As of December 31, 2008, we held no direct investments in auction rate securities, collateralized debt

obligations, structured investment vehicles or mortgage-backed securities.

96

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

eBay Inc.

In Europe, we have a cash pooling arrangement with a financial institution for cash management purposes.
This arrangement allows for cash withdrawals from this financial institution based upon our aggregate operating
cash balances held in Europe within the same financial institution (“Aggregate Cash Deposits”). This arrangement
also allows us to withdraw amounts exceeding the Aggregate Cash Deposits up to an agreed-upon limit. The net
balance of the withdrawals and the Aggregate Cash Deposits are used by the financial institution as a basis for
calculating our net interest expense or income. As of December 31, 2008, we had a total of $1.8 billion in cash
withdrawals offsetting our $1.8 billion in Aggregate Cash Deposits held within the same financial institution under
this cash pooling arrangement.

Our financial instruments, including accounts receivable, loans and interest receivable, funds receivable,
accounts payable, funds payable, amounts due to customers and borrowings under our line of credit are carried at
cost, which approximates their fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments.

Note 8 — Balance Sheet Components:

December 31,

2007

2008

(in thousands)

Other current assets:

Prepaid expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 70,189
—
Deferred tax assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
70,364
Prepaid income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5,876
Derivatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
84,486
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 99,735
130,908
60,135
71,149
98,771

$230,915

$460,698

December 31,

2007

2008

(in thousands)

Property and equipment, net:

Computer equipment and software . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,576,830
359,982
Land and buildings, including building improvements . . . . . . . . . . . .
216,710
Leasehold improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
89,258
Furniture and fixtures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
189,126
Aviation equipment and other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 1,876,370
430,495
278,399
100,717
126,028

Accumulated depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,431,906
(1,311,454)

2,812,009
(1,613,295)

$ 1,120,452

$ 1,198,714

Total depreciation expense on our property and equipment was $324.6 million in 2006, $372.5 million in 2007

and $438.2 million in 2008.

97

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

eBay Inc.

December 31,

2007

2008

(in thousands)

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities:

Acquisition related accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 10,219
221,514
Compensation and related benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
Restructuring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
104,817
Advertising . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
77,401
Contractors and consultants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
70,507
Professional fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
28,506
Transaction loss accrual . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
68,542
VAT accrual. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
150,080
Deferred tax liabilities, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
219,553
Other current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 23,056
174,784
15,146
116,705
49,188
51,899
32,115
75,723
—
246,158

$951,139

$784,774

Certain transactions that result in overdrafts of customer accounts are included in the provision for transaction
and loan losses and are recorded as an offset to other current assets. As of December 31, 2007 and December 31,
2008, these balances were $51.6 million and $58.3 million, respectively.

December 31,

2007

2008

(in thousands)

Accumulated other comprehensive income:

Foreign currency translation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrealized gains on investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrealized (losses) gains on cash flow hedges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Estimated tax provision on above items . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,341,660
589,045
(175)
(229,254)

$788,164
124,874
40,352
(49,905)

$1,701,276

$903,485

Note 9 — Restructuring:

In October 2008, we implemented a strategic reduction of our existing global workforce by approximately
800 employees worldwide to simplify and streamline our organization and strengthen the overall competitiveness of
our existing businesses. As a result of this initiative, we estimate that we will incur aggregate costs of approximately
$65.0 million to $70.0 million. During the year ended December 31, 2008 total restructuring charges were
$49.1 million. The restructuring activities are expected to be substantially completed by the end of the first quarter
of 2009.

A summary of the restructuring and other costs by segment recognized for the year ended December 31, 2008

are as follows (in thousands):

Marketplaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Employee Severance
and Benefits

$29,117
15,837

$44,954

Facilities

Total

$4,165
—

$33,282
15,837

$4,165

$49,119

98

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

eBay Inc.

The following table summarizes the restructuring activity for the year ended December 31, 2008 (in

thousands):

Employee Severance
and Benefits

Facilities

Total

Accrued liability as of January 1, 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-cash items . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

—
44,954
(29,068)
(1,281)
(405)

$ — $

4,165
(407)
(2,812)
—

—
49,119
(29,475)
(4,093)
(405)

Accrued liability as of December 31, 2008 . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 14,200

$

946

$ 15,146

In the table above non-cash items pertain to stock-based compensation expense and the write-down of assets to

their estimated fair value. Adjustments reflect the impact of foreign currency translation.

Note 10 — Borrowings:

Credit Agreement

In November 2006, we entered into a credit agreement which provided for an unsecured $1.0 billion five-year
revolving credit facility. Loans under the credit agreement bore interest at either (i) LIBOR plus a margin ranging
from 0.25 percent to 0.45 percent or (ii) a formula based on the Bank of America, or Agent’s, prime rate or on the
federal funds effective rate.

In August 2007, we entered into an amendment to our 2006 credit agreement. The amendment agreement
increased the lender commitments and borrowing capacity under the 2006 credit agreement from its prior level of
$1.0 billion to $2.0 billion, maintained an option to increase borrowing capacity by an additional $1.0 billion (after
giving effect to the $1.0 billion increase described above) and extended the maturity date by an additional year to
November 7, 2012. Lehman Brothers Commercial Bank was a participating lender in our $2.0 billion credit
agreement. As a result of the bankruptcy of its parent company, our available line of credit has been effectively
reduced by its commitment of $160 million. Loans under the amended credit agreement will bear interest at LIBOR
plus a margin ranging from 0.20 percent to 0.50 percent. Subject to certain conditions stated in the credit agreement,
we may borrow, prepay and reborrow amounts under the credit facility at any time during the term of the credit
agreement. Funds borrowed under the credit agreement may be used for working capital, capital expenditures,
acquisitions and other general corporate purposes of eBay and its subsidiaries. The credit agreement contains
customary representations, warranties, affirmative and negative covenants, including a financial covenant and
events of default. The negative covenants include restrictions regarding the incurrence of additional indebtedness
and liens, and the entry into certain agreements that restrict the ability of our subsidiaries to provide credit support.
The financial covenant requires us to meet a quarterly financial test with respect to a maximum consolidated
leverage ratio.

As of December 31, 2008, we had $1.0 billion outstanding under our credit agreement. This amount was
classified as a current liability included in our consolidated balance sheet. The interest rate at December 31, 2008
was 1.67%. As of December 31, 2008, we were in compliance with the financial covenants associated with the
credit agreement.

Shelf Registration Statement

At December 31, 2008, we had a shelf registration statement available which allows us to issue various types of
debt instruments, such as fixed or floating rate notes, U.S. dollar or foreign currency denominated notes,
redeemable notes, global notes, and dual currency or other indexed notes. Issuances under the shelf registration

99

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

eBay Inc.

will require the filing of a prospectus supplement identifying the amount and terms of the securities to be issued.
Our ability to issue debt is subject to market conditions and other factors impacting our borrowing capacity.

Note 11 — Commitments and Contingencies:

Lease Arrangements

We have lease obligations under certain non-cancelable operating leases. Future minimum rental payments

under our non-cancelable operating leases, at December 31, 2008, are as follows (in thousands):

Year Ending December 31,

Operating
Leases

2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 77,975
63,190
2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
35,672
2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
22,834
2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
16,755
2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
23,109
Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total minimum lease payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $239,535

Rent expense in the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008 totaled $31.9 million, $51.4 million, and

$78.6 million respectively. There were no material capital leases at December 31, 2007 and 2008.

Litigation and Other Legal Matters

In August 2006, Louis Vuitton Malletier and Christian Dior Couture filed two lawsuits in the Paris Court of
Commerce against eBay Inc. and eBay International AG. Among other things, the complaint alleges that we
violated French tort law by negligently broadcasting listings posted by third parties offering counterfeit items
bearing plaintiffs’ trademarks, and by purchasing certain advertising keywords. Around September 2006, Parfums
Christian Dior, Kenzo Parfums, Parfums Givenchy, and Guerlain Société also filed a lawsuit in the Paris Court of
Commerce against eBay Inc. and eBay International AG. The complaint alleges that we have interfered with the
selective distribution network the plaintiffs established in France and the European Union by allowing third parties
to post listings offering genuine perfumes and cosmetics for sale on our websites. In June 2008, the Paris Court of
Commerce ruled that eBay and eBay International AG were liable for failing to prevent the sale of counterfeit items
on its websites that traded on plaintiffs’ brand names and for interfering with the plaintiffs’ selective distribution
network. The court awarded plaintiffs approximately EUR 38.6 million in damages and issued an injunction
prohibiting all sales of perfumes and cosmetics bearing the Dior, Guerlain, Givenchy and Kenzo brands over all
worldwide eBay sites to the extent that they are accessible from France. We have taken measures to comply with the
injunction and have appealed these rulings. However, these and similar suits may force us to modify our business
practices, which could lower our revenue, increase our costs, or make our websites less convenient to our customers.
Any such results could materially harm our business. Other luxury brand owners have also filed suit against us or
have threatened to do so, seeking to hold us liable for, among other things, alleged counterfeit items listed on our
websites by third parties, for “tester” and other not for resale consumer products listed on our websites by third
parties, for the alleged misuse of trademarks in listings, for alleged violations of selective distribution channel laws,
for alleged non-compliance of consumer protection laws or in connection with paid search advertisements. We
continue to believe that we have meritorious defenses to these suits and intend to defend ourselves vigorously.

In June 2006, Net2Phone, Inc. filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
(No. 06-2469) alleging that eBay Inc., Skype Technologies S.A., and Skype Inc. infringed five patents owned by
Net2Phone relating to point-to-point Internet protocol. The suit seeks an injunction against continuing infringe-
ment, unspecified damages, including treble damages for willful infringement, and interest, costs, and fees. We

100

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

eBay Inc.

have filed an answer and counterclaims asserting that the patents are invalid, unenforceable, and were not infringed.
The parties have completed claim construction briefing and attended a pre-trial conference hearing. The claim
construction hearing is set for March 2009 and the trial date is not yet set. We believe that we have meritorious
defenses and intend to defend ourselves vigorously.

In March 2007, a plaintiff filed a purported antitrust class action lawsuit against eBay in the Western District of
Texas alleging that eBay and its wholly owned subsidiary PayPal “monopolized” markets through various anticompe-
titive acts and tying arrangements. The plaintiff alleges claims under sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, as well as
related state law claims. The complaint seeks treble damages and an injunction. In April 2007, the plaintiff re-filed the
complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (No. 07-CV-01882-RS), and dismissed the
Texas action. In 2007, the case was consolidated with other similar lawsuits (No. 07-CV-01882JF). In June 2007, we filed
a motion to dismiss the class action complaint. In March 2008, the court granted the motion to dismiss the tying claims
with leave to amend and denied the motion with respect to the monopolization claims. Plaintiffs subsequently decided
not to refile the tying claims. The class certification motion is scheduled for June 2009. We believe that we have
meritorious defenses and intend to defend ourselves vigorously.

In May 2007, Netcraft Corporation filed a lawsuit in the Western District of Wisconsin (No. 07-C-0254C)
alleging that eBay and PayPal infringed two of its patents entitled “Internet billing methods.” The suit seeks an
injunction against continuing infringement, unspecified damages, and interest, costs, and fees. In September 2007,
we filed a motion for summary judgment of noninfringement on both patents. In December 2007, the U.S. District
Court for the Western District of Wisconsin entered a judgment granting our motion for summary judgment of non-
infringement on both of the patents that Netcraft asserted against eBay and PayPal. This judgment was affirmed by
the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in December 2008.

In October 2007, PartsRiver filed a lawsuit in the Eastern District of Texas (No. 2-07CV-440-DF) alleging that
eBay, Microsoft, Yahoo!, Shopzilla, PriceGrabber and PriceRunner infringed its patent relating to search methods.
The suit seeks an injunction against continuing infringement, unspecified damages, and interest, costs, and fees.
The defendants have moved to transfer venue and the parties are conducting discovery. Fact discovery cutoff is
scheduled for July 2009, the claim construction hearing is scheduled for April 2009 and trial is scheduled for
October 2009. We believe that we have meritorious defenses and intend to defend ourselves vigorously.

eBay’s Korean subsidiary, IAC, has notified a majority of its approximately 20 million users of a data breach
involving personally identifiable information including name, address, resident registration number and some
transaction and refund data (but not including credit card information or real time banking information).
Approximately 141,000 users have sued IAC over this breach in several lawsuits in Korean courts and we expect
more to do so in the future. There is some precedent in Korea for a court to grant “consolation money” for data
breaches without a specific finding of harm from the breach. Such precedents have involved payments of up to
approximately $200 per user. A consumer agency recently made a non-binding recommendation that IAC make
payments of 50,000-100,000 Korean won (approximately $35-70) to consumers who had complained to it as a
result of such breach. IAC intends to vigorously defend itself in this lawsuit.

Other third parties have from time to time claimed, and others may claim in the future, that we have infringed
their intellectual property rights. We are subject to additional patent disputes, and expect that we will increasingly
be subject to patent infringement claims as our services expand in scope and complexity. In particular, we expect
that we may face additional patent infringement claims involving various aspects of our Marketplaces, Payments
and Communications businesses. We have in the past been forced to litigate such claims. We may also become more
vulnerable to third-party claims as laws such as the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, the Lanham Act and the
Communications Decency Act are interpreted by the courts, and as we become subject to laws in jurisdictions where
the underlying laws with respect to the potential liability of online intermediaries like ourselves are either unclear or
less favorable. We believe that additional lawsuits alleging that we have violated copyright or trademark laws will
be filed against us. Intellectual property claims, whether meritorious or not, are time consuming and costly to

101

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

eBay Inc.

resolve, could require expensive changes in our methods of doing business, or could require us to enter into costly
royalty or licensing agreements.

From time to time, we are involved in other disputes or regulatory inquiries that arise in the ordinary course of
business. The number and significance of these disputes and inquiries are increasing as our business expands and
our company grows larger. Any claims or regulatory actions against us, whether meritorious or not, could be time
consuming, result in costly litigation, require significant amounts of management time, and result in the diversion of
significant operational resources.

Indemnification Provisions

In the ordinary course of business, we have included limited indemnification provisions in certain of our
agreements with parties with whom we have commercial relations, including our standard marketing, promotions
and application-programming-interface license agreements. Under these contracts, we generally indemnify, hold
harmless, and agree to reimburse the indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party in
connection with claims by a third party with respect to our domain names, trademarks, logos and other branding
elements to the extent that such marks are applicable to our performance under the subject agreement. In a limited
number of agreements, we have provided an indemnity for other types of third-party claims, which are indemnities
mainly related to various intellectual property rights. In our PayPal business, we have provided an indemnity to our
payment processors in the event of certain third-party claims or card association fines against the processor arising
out of conduct by PayPal or PayPal’s customers. It is not possible to determine the maximum potential loss under
these indemnification provisions due to our limited history of prior indemnification claims and the unique facts and
circumstances involved in each particular provision. To date, no significant costs have been incurred, either
individually or collectively, in connection with our indemnification provisions.

Note 12 — Related Party Transactions:

We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors, executive officers and certain
other officers. These agreements require us to indemnify such individuals, to the fullest extent permitted by
Delaware law, for certain liabilities to which they may become subject as a result of their affiliation with us.

All contracts with related parties are at rates and terms that we believe are comparable with those entered into
with independent third parties. There were no material related party transactions in 2006, 2007 and 2008. As of
December 31, 2008, there were no significant amounts payable or amounts receivable from related parties.

Note 13 — Preferred Stock:

We are authorized, subject to limitations prescribed by Delaware law to issue Preferred Stock in one or more
series; to establish the number of shares included within each series; to fix the rights, preferences and privileges of
the shares of each wholly unissued series and any related qualifications, limitations or restrictions; and to increase or
decrease the number of shares of any series (but not below the number of shares of a series then outstanding) without
any further vote or action by the stockholders. At December 31, 2007 and 2008, there were 10 million shares of
$0.001 par value Preferred Stock authorized for issuance, and no shares issued or outstanding.

Note 14 — Common Stock:

Our Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, authorizes us to issue 3.6 billion shares of common stock. A
portion of the shares issued and outstanding are subject to repurchase or forfeiture over a four-year period from the
earlier of the issuance date or employee hire date, as applicable. At December 31, 2008 there were 154,892 shares
subject to repurchase rights or forfeiture, respectively.

102

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

eBay Inc.

Treasury Stock

In June 2006, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program for $2.0 billion of our common
stock, excluding broker commissions. In January 2007, our Board authorized an expansion of the stock repurchase
program to provide for the repurchase of up to an additional $2.0 billion of our common stock by January 2009. In
January 2008, our Board approved an additional stock repurchase program to repurchase an additional $2.0 billion
of our common stock. The stock repurchase activity under our stock repurchase program during 2008 is
summarized as follows (in thousands, except per-share amounts):

Shares
Repurchased

Balance at January 1, 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Authorization of new plan in January 2008 . . .
Repurchase of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . .

99,084
—
80,608

Average
Price per
Share

$31.84
—
27.15

Value of
Shares
Repurchased

$3,154,682
—
2,188,818

Remaining
Amount
Authorized

$

845,318
2,000,000
(2,188,818)

Balance at December 31, 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . .

179,692

$29.74

$5,343,500

$

656,500

These repurchased shares are recorded as treasury stock and are accounted for under the cost method. No

repurchased shares have been retired or reissued.

From time to time, we enter into structured equity hedging transactions. According to the terms of these
transactions, if the market price of our common stock exceeds a pre-determined price on the maturity date, we have
the option to settle these transactions in cash or by repurchasing shares of our common stock. If the market price of
our common stock is below that pre-determined price on the maturity date, we are required to settle these
transactions by repurchasing shares of our common stock. The number of shares repurchased through the use of
structured equity hedging transactions is included in the table above. The structured equity hedging transactions that
settled in cash during the year ended December 31, 2008, resulted in premiums of approximately $12.3 million,
which were recorded as additional paid-in capital.

Our stock repurchase programs may be limited or terminated at any time without prior notice. Stock repurchases
under these programs may be made through a variety of open market and privately negotiated transactions, including
structured stock repurchase transactions or other derivative transactions, at times and in such amounts as management
deems appropriate and will be funded from the company’s working capital or other financing alternatives. The timing
and actual number of shares repurchased will depend on a variety of factors including corporate and regulatory
requirements, price and other market conditions. The programs are intended to comply with the volume, timing and
other limitations set forth in Rule 10b-18 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

In addition to the above, we have withheld shares from employees to satisfy tax obligations.

Note 15 — Benefit Plans:

Equity Incentive Plans

We have equity incentive plans for directors, officers and employees that consist of stock options, restricted
stock units, nonvested shares and performance based restricted stock units. At December 31, 2008, 627.5 million
shares were authorized under our equity incentive plans and 79.4 million shares were available for future grant.

All stock options granted under these plans generally vest 25% one year from the date of grant (or 12.5% six
months from the date of grant for grants to existing employees) and the remainder vest at a rate of 2.08% per month
thereafter, and generally expire seven to 10 years from the date of grant. The cost of stock options is determined
using the Black-Scholes option pricing model on the date of grant.

Restricted stock units and nonvested shares are granted to eligible employees under our equity incentive plans.
In general, restricted stock units and nonvested shares cliff vest over one to five years, are subject to the employees’

103

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

eBay Inc.

continuing service to the company and do not have an expiration date. The cost of restricted stock units and
nonvested shares is determined using the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant.

In 2007 and 2008, certain executives were eligible for performance based restricted stock units. The number of
restricted stock units ultimately received depends on our business performance against specified performance
targets set by the Compensation Committee. If the performance criteria are satisfied, the performance based
restricted stock units will be granted and one-half of the grant will vest in March following the end of the
performance period and the remaining half will vest one year later.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

We have an employee stock purchase plan for all eligible employees. Under the plan, shares of our common
stock may be purchased over an offering period with a maximum duration of two years at 85% of the lower of the
fair market value on the first day of the applicable offering period or on the last day of the six-month purchase
period. Employees may purchase shares having a value not exceeding 10% of their gross compensation during an
offering period. During the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007, and 2008, employees purchased approximately
1.6 million, 2.0 million, and 3.5 million shares at average prices of $27.32, $26.84 and $17.78 per share,
respectively. At December 31, 2008, approximately 3.7 million shares of common stock were reserved for future
issuance. Our employee stock purchase plan contains an “evergreen” provision that automatically increases, on
each January 1, the number of shares reserved for issuance under the employee stock purchase plan by the number
of shares purchased under this plan in the preceding calendar year.

Employee Savings Plans

We have a savings plan, which qualifies under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Participating
employees may contribute up to 25% of their annual salary, but not more than statutory limits. In 2006 and 2007, we
contributed one dollar for each dollar a participant contributed, with a maximum contribution of $1,500 per
employee and $2,000 per employee, respectively. In 2008, we contributed one dollar for each dollar a participant
contributed, with a maximum contribution of 4% of each employee’s salary, with a maximum employer contri-
bution of $9,200 per employee. Our non-U.S. employees are covered by various other savings plans. Our expenses
for these plans were $14.9 million in 2006, $20.4 million in 2007 and $34.2 million in 2008.

Deferred Stock Unit Plan

Since December 31, 2002, we have granted deferred stock units to non-employee directors (other than Pierre
Omidyar) elected to our Board of Directors with each new director receiving a one-time grant of deferred stock units
equal to the result of dividing $150,000 by the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant.
Beginning with our 2008 annual meeting of stockholders, we have granted deferred stock units to each non-
employee director (other than Mr. Omidyar) equal to the result of dividing $110,000 by the fair market value of our
common stock on the date of grant. Each deferred stock unit constitutes an unfunded and unsecured promise by us to
deliver one share of our common stock (or the equivalent value thereof in cash or property at our election). Each
deferred stock unit award granted to a new non-employee director upon election to the Board vests 25% one year
from the date of grant, and at a rate of 2.08% per month thereafter. If the services of the director are terminated at
any time, all rights to the unvested deferred stock units shall also terminate. In addition, directors may elect to
receive, in lieu of annual retainer and committee chair fees and at the time these fees would otherwise be payable
(i.e., on a quarterly basis in arrears for services provided), fully vested deferred stock units with an initial value
equal to the amount based on the fair market value of common stock at the date of grant. Deferred stock units are
payable following the termination of a director’s tenure as a director. As of December 31, 2008, there were
approximately 98,000 deferred stock units outstanding under our equity plans.

104

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

eBay Inc.

Stock Option Valuation Assumptions

We calculated the fair value of each option award on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing

model. The following weighted-average assumptions were used for each respective period:

Year Ended December 31,
2007

2008

2006

Risk-free interest rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected life . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividend yield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected volatility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.7%
3.0 years
0%
36%

4.5%
3.5 years
0%
37%

2.3%
3.8 years
0%
34%

Our computation of expected volatility is based on a combination of historical and market-based implied
volatility from traded options on our stock. Our computation of expected life was determined based on historical
experience of similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms of the stock-based awards, vesting
schedules and expectations of future employee behavior. The interest rate for periods within the contractual life of
the award is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

Stock-Based Compensation Expense

The following table presents details of total stock-based compensation expense that is included in each line

item on our consolidated statement of income (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,
2007

2006

2008

Cost of net revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 32,981
96,547
Sales and marketing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
81,489
Product development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
106,393
General and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
Restructuring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 37,009
81,299
76,002
107,503
—

$ 43,417
94,314
95,396
118,915
1,281

Total stock-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $317,410

$301,813

$353,323

In general, the stock-based compensation expense for our equity incentive awards is recognized over their
respective vesting period. As of December 31, 2008, there was approximately $749.9 million of unearned stock-
based compensation estimated to be expensed from 2009 through 2012. If there are any modifications or
cancellations of the underlying unvested awards, we may be required to accelerate, increase or cancel any
remaining unearned stock-based compensation expense. Future unearned stock-based compensation will increase
to the extent we grant additional equity awards or change the mix of grants between stock options and restricted
stock units or assume unvested equity awards in connection with acquisitions.

Prior to the adoption of FAS 123(R), the intrinsic value of Skype’s and Shopping.com’s unvested common
stock options assumed in the acquisition was recorded as unearned stock-based compensation. Upon the adoption of
FAS 123(R) in January 2006, the unearned stock-based compensation balance of $45.5 million was reclassified to
additional paid-in capital.

105

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

eBay Inc.

Stock Option Activity

The following table summarizes stock option activity under our equity incentive plans as of and for the year

ended December 31, 2008 (in thousands, except per share amounts):

Shares

Weighted Average
Exercise Price

Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
(in years)

Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value

Outstanding at January 1, 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117,861
23,277
Granted and assumed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(7,477)
Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(17,601)
Forfeited/expired/cancelled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Outstanding at December 31, 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . 116,060

Expected to vest at December 31, 2008 . . . . . . . . 111,643
85,097
Options exercisable at December 31, 2008 . . . . . .

$32.45
$14.43
$12.04
$35.19

$29.79

$30.06
$31.42

4.71

4.64
4.20

$100,916

$ 90,229
$ 40,770

The aggregate intrinsic value was calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying
awards and the quoted price of our common stock. At December 31, 2008, 14.3 million options were in-the-money.

The weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted during the years 2006, 2007 and 2008 was
$10.47, $10.60 and $7.46, respectively. During the years 2006, 2007 and 2008, the aggregate intrinsic value of
options exercised under our equity incentive plans was $283.6 million, $402.4 million and $83.0 million,
respectively, determined as of the date of option exercise.

Restricted Stock Units

A summary of the status of and changes in restricted stock units granted (including performance-based
restricted stock units that have been earned) under our equity incentive plans as of December 31, 2008 and changes
during the year ended December 31, 2008 is presented below (in thousands, except per share amounts):

Oustanding at January 1, 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Awarded . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Shares

8,833
23,676
(2,156)
(3,532)

Outstanding at December 31, 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

26,821

Expected to vest at December 31, 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

21,560

Weighted Average
Grant-Date Fair
Value (per share)

$32.70
$23.91
$32.47
$28.59

$25.50

106

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

eBay Inc.

Nonvested Shares Activity

A summary of the status of and changes in nonvested shares granted under our equity incentive plans and
assumed in acquisitions as of December 31, 2008 and changes during the year ended December 31, 2008 is
presented below (in thousands, except per share amounts):

Nonvested at January 1, 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Shares

431
8
(252)
(33)

Nonvested at December 31, 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

154

Weighted Average
Grant-Date Fair
Value (per share)

$30.46
$29.68
$30.57
$24.20

$31.54

During the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008, the fair value of awards vested under our stock

plans was $2.5 million, $3.7 million and $4.6 million respectively, determined as of the date of vesting.

Note 16 — Income Taxes:

The components of pretax income in consolidated companies for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007

and 2008 are as follows (in thousands):

United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
International . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 776,553
770,504

$717,614
33,237

$ 327,927
1,855,637

$1,547,057

$750,851

$2,183,564

Year Ended December 31,
2007

2008

2006

The provision for income taxes is composed of the following (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,
2007

2006

2008

Current:

Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and local . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 460,262
122,396
66,610

$ 402,235
38,087
85,649

$ 414,301
94,763
101,662

649,268

525,971

610,726

Deferred:

Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and local . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(146,872)
(32,331)
(48,647)

(81,745)
(13,976)
(27,650)

(148,094)
(21,109)
(37,433)

(227,850)

(123,371)

(206,636)

$ 421,418

$ 402,600

$ 404,090

107

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

eBay Inc.

The following is a reconciliation of the difference between the actual provision for income taxes and the
provision computed by applying the federal statutory rate of 35% for 2006, 2007, and 2008 to income before income
taxes (in thousands):

Provision at statutory rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Permanent differences:

Year Ended December 31,
2007

2006

2008

$ 541,471

$ 262,798

$ 764,248

Foreign income taxed at different rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill impairment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State taxes, net of federal benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax credits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(230,350)
—
35,652
26,179
58,542
(1,142)
(8,934)

(404,007)
486,828
34,983
24,516
15,672
(7,766)
(10,424)

(519,203)
—
48,614
26,730
54,356
(9,251)
38,596

$ 421,418

$ 402,600

$ 404,090

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences of differences between the
carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases using enacted tax rates in effect for the year
in which the differences are expected to reverse. Significant deferred tax assets and liabilities consist of the
following (in thousands):

December 31,

2007

2008

Deferred tax assets:

Net operating loss and credits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accruals and allowances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net unrealized (gains) losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 159,333
174,552
158,767
4,145

$ 311,807
242,763
212,147
4,052

Net deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

496,797
(119,153)

770,769
(167,767)

Deferred tax liabilities:

Acquisition-related intangibles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Available-for-sale securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign statutory reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(152,068)
(36,462)
(235,894)
(12,386)

(165,793)
(73,477)
(48,812)
(19,498)

377,644

603,002

(436,810)

(307,580)

$ (59,166)

$ 295,422

As of December 31, 2008 our federal, foreign and state net operating loss carryforwards, or NOLs, for income
tax purposes were approximately $263.9 million, $755.5 million, and $41.7 million, respectively. Of the
$263.9 million of federal net operating loss carryforwards, approximately $227.5 million relate to acquisitions
that occurred during the year. The federal and state net operating loss carryforwards are subject to various
limitations under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. If not utilized, the federal net operating loss

108

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

eBay Inc.

carryforwards will begin to expire in 2020, the state net operating loss carryforwards will begin to expire in 2010. As
of December 31, 2008, our state tax credit carryforwards for income tax purposes were approximately $20.8 million.
If not utilized, the state tax credit carryforwards will begin to expire in 2015.

At December 31, 2008 and 2007, we maintained a valuation allowance with respect to certain of our deferred
tax assets relating primarily to operating losses in certain non-U.S. jurisdictions that we believe are not likely to be
realized.

We have not provided for U.S. federal income and foreign withholding taxes on $5.6 billion of non-U.S. sub-
sidiaries’ undistributed earnings as of December 31, 2008, because such earnings are intended to be indefinitely
reinvested in the operations and potential acquisitions related to our international operations. Upon distribution of
those earnings in the form of dividends or otherwise, we would be subject to U.S. income taxes (subject to an
adjustment for foreign tax credits). It is not practicable to determine the income tax liability that might be incurred if
these earnings were to be distributed.

The Company enjoys “tax holidays’’ in several different jurisdictions, most significantly Singapore and
Switzerland. The tax holidays provide for lower rates of taxation on certain classes of income and require various
thresholds of investment and employment in those jurisdictions. These tax holidays are in effect currently and
expire over periods ranging from 2011 to the duration of business operations in the respective jurisdictions.

On January 1, 2007, we adopted the provisions of FIN 48. The adoption of FIN 48 resulted in a $145,000

adjustment to beginning retained earnings.

The following table reflects changes in the unrecognized tax benefits since January 1, 2007:

Gross amounts of unrecognized tax benefits as the beginning of the

period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Increases related to prior year tax positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Increases related to current year tax positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 385,700
—
108,553

$494,253
5,220
201,901

Gross amounts of unrecognized tax benefits as of the end of the period . . . .

$ 494,253

$701,374

2007

2008

(in thousands)

The total liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits, and the increase in these liabilities in 2008 relates primarily
to the allocations of revenue and costs among our global operations. Our liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits are
recorded as deferred and other tax liabilities, net in our consolidated balance sheet. If recognized, the portion of
liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits that would decrease our provision for income taxes and increase our net
income is $694.9 million. The impact on net income reflects the liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits net of
certain deferred tax assets and the federal tax benefit of state income tax items.

Over the next twelve months, our existing tax positions will continue to generate an increase in liabilities for
unrecognized tax benefits. We recognize interest and/or penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax
expense. The amount of interest and penalties accrued as of December 31, 2007 and 2008 was approximately
$16.3 million and $52.6 million, respectively. During the year, a change in California law was enacted resulting in
the accrual of $18.5 million of potential penalties.

We are subject to taxation in the U.S. and various states and foreign jurisdictions. We are under examination by
certain tax authorities for the 2003 tax year. The material jurisdictions that are subject to potential examination by
tax authorities for tax years after 2002 primarily include the U.S., California, France, Germany, Italy, Switzerland
and Singapore.

109

Supplementary Data — Quarterly Financial Data-Unaudited

The following tables present certain unaudited consolidated quarterly financial information for each of the
eight quarters ended December 31, 2008. This quarterly information has been prepared on the same basis as the
Consolidated Financial Statements and includes all adjustments necessary to state fairly the information for the
periods presented.

Quarterly Financial Data
(Unaudited, in thousands, except per share amounts)

March 31

June 30

September 30

December 31

Quarter Ended

2007
Net revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,768,074

$1,834,429

$1,889,220

$2,180,606

Gross profit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,374,385

$1,417,640

$1,442,699

$1,674,633

Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 377,176

$ 375,824

$ (935,635)

$ 530,886

Net income (loss) per share-basic . . . . . . .

Net income (loss) per share-diluted . . . . . .

$

$

0.28

0.27

$

$

0.28

0.27

$

$

(0.69)

(0.69)

$

$

0.39

0.39

Weighted-average shares:

Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,366,915
1,384,287

1,361,046
1,378,697

1,354,786
1,354,786

1,352,077
1,368,067

March 31

June 30

September 30

December 31

Quarter Ended

2008
Net revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$2,192,223

$2,195,661

$2,117,531

$2,035,846

Gross profit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,666,811

$1,633,558

$1,556,568

$1,456,255

Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 459,718

$ 460,345

$ 492,219

$ 367,192

Net income per share-basic . . . . . . . . . . . .

Net income per share-diluted . . . . . . . . . . .

$

$

0.34

0.34

$

$

0.35

0.35

$

$

0.38

0.38

$

$

0.29

0.29

Weighted-average shares:

Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,333,791
1,343,989

1,312,007
1,325,136

1,288,937
1,297,484

1,279,536
1,284,279

In the third quarter of 2007, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $1.4 billion related to our
Communications reporting unit. See “Note 3 — Business Combinations, Goodwill and Intangible Assets” to the
consolidated financial statements included in this report.

In the fourth quarter of 2008, we recorded a restructuring charge of $49.1 million. See “Note 9 — Restruc-

turing” to the consolidated financial statements included in this report.

110

eBay Inc.

FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE

The Financial Statement Schedule II — VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS is filed as part of

this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Allowances for Doubtful Accounts and

Authorized Credits
Year ended December 31, 2006 . . . . . . . .
Year ended December 31, 2007 . . . . . . . .
Year ended December 31, 2008 . . . . . . . .

Allowance for Transaction and Loan

Losses
Year ended December 31, 2006 . . . . . . . .
Year ended December 31, 2007 . . . . . . . .
Year ended December 31, 2008(1) . . . . . .

Tax Valuation Allowance

Year ended December 31, 2006 . . . . . . . .
Year ended December 31, 2007 . . . . . . . .
Year ended December 31, 2008 . . . . . . . .

$ 77,712
69,777
$119,153

Balance at
Beginning of
Period

Charged/
Credited to
Net Income

Charged to
Other
Account
(In thousands)

Charges
Utilized/
Write-offs

Balance at
End of
Period

$ 73,585
82,865
$ 96,217

$100,729
96,461
$117,864

$ — $ (91,449)
(83,109)
$ — $(109,195)

—

$ 82,865
96,217
$104,886

$ 63,054
87,955
$133,824

$170,599
196,318
$231,207

$ 28,513
34,983
$ 48,614

$ — $(145,698)
(195,995)
$ — $(226,559)

—

$ 87,955
88,278
$138,472

$ 6,420
14,393
$ — $

$ (42,868)

$ 69,777
— 119,153
— $167,767

(1) Included in the beginning balance are amounts related to the Bill Me Later acquisition.

111

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the
City of San Jose, State of California, on the 19th day of February, 2009.

SIGNATURES

eBay Inc.

By: /s/

John Donahoe

John Donahoe
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOWALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes
and appoints John Donahoe, Robert H. Swan, Phillip P. DePaul, and Michael R. Jacobson, and each or any one of
them, each with the power of substitution, his or her attorney-in-fact, to sign any amendments to this report, with
exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact, or his substitute or substitutes, may do or
cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed

below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Principal Executive Officer:

Principal Financial Officer:

By: /s/

John Donahoe

John Donahoe
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

By: /s/ Robert H. Swan
Robert H. Swan
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

Principal Accounting Officer:

By: /s/ Phillip P. DePaul
Phillip P. DePaul
Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer

112

Additional Directors

By: /s/ Pierre M. Omidyar
Pierre M. Omidyar
Founder, Chairman of the Board and Director

By: /s/ Fred D. Anderson
Fred D. Anderson
Director

By: /s/ Edward W. Barnholt
Edward W. Barnholt
Director

By: /s/ Scott D. Cook
Scott D. Cook
Director

By: /s/ Dawn G. Lepore
Dawn G. Lepore
Director

By: /s/ Richard T. Schlosberg, III
Richard T. Schlosberg, III
Director

By: /s/ Marc Andreessen
Marc Andreessen
Director

By: /s/ Philippe Bourguignon
Philippe Bourguignon
Director

By: /s/ William C. Ford, Jr.
William C. Ford, Jr.
Director

By: /s/ David M. Moffett
David M. Moffett
Director

By: /s/ Thomas J. Tierney
Thomas J. Tierney
Director

Date: February 19, 2009

113

(This page intentionally left blank)