Quarterlytics / Basic Materials / Gold / Eldorado Gold Corp

Eldorado Gold Corp

ego · AMEX Basic Materials
Claim this profile
Ticker ego
Exchange AMEX
Sector Basic Materials
Industry Gold
Employees 1001-5000
← All annual reports
FY2008 Annual Report · Eldorado Gold Corp
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
Eldorado Gold Corporation

2008 Annual Report

E
L
D
O
R
A
D
O
G
O
L
D
C
O
R
P
O
R
A
T
I
O
N

2
0
0
8
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tanjianshan mine,  China
Tanjianshan mine,  China

Kişladağ mine,  Turkey
Kişladağ mine,  Turkey

Summary

Corporate Profile.................................................................................................................................. 

2008 Highlights................................................................................................................................... 

Letter to Our Shareholders................................................................................................................. 

Resources and Reserves.................................................................................................................... 

Production Highlights.......................................................................................................................... 

Stakeholder and Community Relations............................................................................................. 

Financial Review

Management’s Discussion & Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations....... 

Management’s Responsibility for Financial Reporting................................................................

Independent Auditors’ Report.......................................................................................................

Consolidated Balance Sheets.......................................................................................................

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Deficit...................................................................

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows......................................................................................

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.................................................................

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements........................................................................

Consolidated Financial Information..............................................................................................

Corporate Information.........................................................................................................................

Forward-Looking Statements..............................................................................................................

3

3

4

6

7

8

16

37

38

40

41

42

43

44

82

84

86

Corporate Profile

Eldorado Gold Corporation is a gold producer active in exploration and development in Brazil, 
China, Greece, Turkey and surrounding regions.

We are one of the lowest cost pure gold producers reporting, with a strong balance sheet, no 
debt and no hedge positions.

Our goal is to produce 700,000 to 800,000 ounces of gold annually by 2013. We are well 
positioned to grow in value as we create and pursue new opportunities in gold and other 
resources.

Our shares trade on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) under the symbol ELD and on the New 
York Stock Exchange Amex (NYSE-A) under the symbol EGO. 

2008 Highlights (All amounts expressed in U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

Solid growth
 ▪

308,802 ounces of gold produced (15% 
increase)

 ▪

 ▪

11.8 million ounces of measured and indicated 
resources and 4.2 million ounces of inferred 
resources (12% increase)

7.6 million ounces of proven and probable gold 
reserves (replaced reserves mined in 2008) 

Proven ability to explore, develop, 
and operate
 ▪

Advanced construction at the Efemçukuru gold 
project in Turkey and at the Vila Nova iron ore 
project in Brazil

 ▪

Completed two transactions with the potential 
to add 300,000 ounces of annual production 
by 2013

Low cost production
 ▪

Total cash cost of $289 per ounce, which 
positions Eldorado in the lowest quartile of 
production cost

Enhancing shareholder value
 ▪

Top performer on the S&P/TSX composite index 
with share appreciation of 65.5 per cent

 ▪

Record earnings of $0.46 per share

Strong balance sheet
 ▪
Debt free and unhedged

 ▪

 ▪

Paid all debt owed to HSBC Bank, releasing 
restricted cash

Completed sale of São Bento mine to AngloGold 
Ashanti for $70.0 million

 ▪

Cash flow from operations of $0.30 per share  

2008 Annual Report

3

Sulphide Ore Processing Facilities
Sulphide Ore Processing Facilities
Tanjianshan mine, China
Tanjianshan mine, China

Coarse Ore Stock Pile
Coarse Ore Stock Pile
Kişladağ mine, Turkey
Kişladağ mine, Turkey

Letter to Our Shareholders

I am extremely pleased to report that 2008 was another successful year for Eldorado despite an extremely 
turbulent and volatile economic environment. Our teams around the world continue to execute in 
accordance with our articulated plans.

In 2008, our mines produced 308,802 ounces of gold at a total cash cost of $289 per ounce, maintaining 
our position as one of the lowest cost pure gold producers. Despite significant cost pressures we expanded 
operating cash margins for the fourth consecutive year. Our ability to grow our margins is in sharp contrast 
to other companies in our sector who have, despite higher gold prices, failed to deliver improved margins.

Our strong operating performance contributed significantly to the profit of $0.46 per share for the year. 
The market recognized and rewarded this performance: Eldorado was the top performer on the S&P/TSX 
composite index, with a share appreciation of 65.5 percent.

In Turkey at our Kişladağ mine the year saw the successful expansion of throughput from 5 to 10 million 
tonnes per annum and the conversion to owner operated mining with the purchase of our own mining fleet.

Construction began at our Efemçukuru project, where production is now anticipated to begin in 2010.

In China, our Tanjianshan mine produced in excess of plan with 118,468 ounces of gold for the year, 
while successfully managing the construction of the sulphide processing circuit that is presently being 
commissioned.

4

Eldorado Gold

In 2008, we also completed two transactions, acquiring 
the Perama Hill project in Greece and establishing 
participation in the highly prospective Tocantinzinho 
project in the Tapajos district in Brazil. We believe that 
the development of these projects will provide the 
opportunity to contribute approximately 300,000 ounces 
of annual gold production to Eldorado within a five-year 
time frame.

The Company’s exploration efforts, which totalled $19.7 
million in expenditures, were rewarded by an expanded 
resource base. This enabled us to essentially replace 
reserves mined maintaining 7,561,000 ounces of proven 
and probable reserves at year-end.

The continued success of our Company is largely 
attributed to the dedication of our staff in the regions we 
operate.

$/oz

1,000

Growing Margins

800

600

400

200

0

876

674

609

409

444

           107                                                     279                       411                        587

           302                      416                       330                       263                        289

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Total Cash Cost

Margins

Realized Gold Price

It is with great enthusiasm that I look forward to together 
continuing to build a Company that we all take great 
pride in.

Au oz

800,000

Increasing Production

We remain committed in 2009 to following our stated 
path that provides for the development of a strong 
sustainable mining company based on high quality, low-
cost, long-lived assets. Our strong balance sheet with 
no debt and no hedge positions supports our continued 
growth.

Sincerely,

640,000

480,000

320,000

160,000

0

2007
Actual

2008
Actual

2009
Forecast

2010
Forecast

2011
Forecast

2012
Forecast

2013
Forecast

Paul N. Wright
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 19, 2009

São Bento

Kişladağ

Tanjianshan

Efemçukuru

Perama + TZ

Expanding Resources and Reserves

000s Au oz

16,000

12,000

8,000

4,000

0

2005

2006

2007

2008

Reserves

Measured

Indicated

Inferred

2008 Annual Report

5

Resources and Reserves

GOLD

Property

Kişladağ
Measured
Indicated
M + I
Inferred

Tanjianshan
Measured
Indicated
M + I
Inferred

Efemçukuru
Measured
Indicated
M + I
Inferred

Perama
Measured
Indicated
M + I
Inferred

Total
Measured
Indicated
M + I
Inferred

RESOURCES

RESERVES

Tonnes 
(x1000)

Grade
(Au g/t)

In–Situ Gold 
ounces (x1000)

Tonnes 
(x1000)

Grade
(Au g/t)

In–Situ Gold 
ounces (x1000)

 72,810 
 207,070 
 279,880 
 126,900 

 6,985 
 2,941 
 9,926 
 3,493 

 1,235 
 3,683 
 4,918 
 2,109 

–
 11,710 
 11,710 
 8,733 

 81,030 
 225,404 
 306,434 
 141,235 

 1.04 
 0.82 
 0.88 
 0.63 

 3.34 
 2.76 
 3.17 
 3.54 

 13.80 
 8.39 
 9.75 
 9.95 

–
 3.62 
 3.62 
 1.96 

 1.43 
 1.11 
 1.20 
 0.92 

 2,432 
 5,430 
 7,862 
 2,552 

 751 
 261 
 1,012 
 398 

 548 
 993 
 1,541 
 675 

–
 1,363 
 1,363 
 552 

 3,731 
 8,047 
 11,778 
 4,177 

Proven
Probable
Total

 67,746 
 93,811 
 161,557 

 1.08 
 1.05 
 1.06 

Proven
Probable
Total

 5,609 
 1,152 
 6,761 

 3.77 
 3.71 
 3.76 

Proven
Probable
Total

 1,320 
 2,465 
 3,785 

 11.89 
 9.04 
 10.04 

Proven
Probable
Total

–
–
–

–
–
–

 2,353 
 3,170 
 5,523 

 680 
 137 
 817 

 505 
 716 
 1,221 

–
–
–

Proven
Probable
Total

 74,675
 97,428
 172,103 

 1.47 
 1.28 
 1.37 

 3,538 
 4,023 
 7,561 

IRON

RESOURCES

Property

Vila Nova
Measured
Indicated
M + I
Inferred

Tonnes 
(x1000)

Grade 
(Fe%)

 2,285 
 7,679 
 9,964 
 2,022 

 63.5 
 61.0 
 61.6 
 61.2 

RESERVES

Tonnes 
(x1000)

Grade 
(Fe%)

Proven
Probable
Total

 2,285 
 6,987 
 9,272 

 63.5 
 60.2 
 61.0 

Notes for Resources:       
1)  Gold price used was $725/oz.     
2)  Cut–off grades (gold g/t): Kişladağ: 0.4 g/t; Tanjianshan: 1.0 g/t; Efemçukuru: 3.0 g/t; Perama: 1.0 g/t. 
3)  Qualified Person: Stephen Juras, Ph.D., P.Geo. and Manager, Geology for the Company is the qualified person responsible for all the mineral   
      resource estimates for the Company’s material properties, namely Kişladağ, Tanjianshan and Efemçukuru; the Company does not currently 
      consider Perama or Vila Nova to be material properties.   

Notes for Reserves:  
1)  Gold price used for Kişladağ and Tanjianshan was $725/oz. and for Efemçukuru was $530/oz. 
2)  Cut–off grades (gold g/t): Kişladağ: 0.35 g/t oxide, 0.50 g/t sulphide; Tanjianshan: 1.3 g/t JLG oxide, 1.64 g/t JLG sulphide; Efemçukuru: 4.5 g/t. 
3)  Qualified Persons: Richard Miller, P.Eng. and Manager, Mine Engineering of the Company, is responsible for the Kişladağ and Tanjianshan 
      reserves; Andy Nichols, P.Eng., Chief Mining Engineer of Wardrop Engineering, is responsible for the Efemçukuru reserves. 
4)  Mineral Reserves include Mineral Resources.

6

Eldorado Gold

Production Highlights

Gold Production
  Total Ounces Produced
  Commercial Production
  Cash Operating Cost ($/oz)1,4
  Total Cash Cost ($/oz)2,4
  Total Production Cost ($/oz)3,4
  Realized Price ($/oz–sold) 

Kişladağ Mine, Turkey5
  Commercial Production
  Tonnes to Pad
  Grade (grams/tonne)
  Cash Operating Cost ($/oz)4
  Total Cash Cost ($/oz)2,4
  Total Production Cost ($/oz)3,4

Tanjianshan Mine, China
  Total Ounces Produced
  Commercial Production
  Tonnes Milled
  Grade (grams/tonne)
  Cash Operating Cost ($/oz)4
  Total Cash Cost ($/oz)2,4
  Total Production Cost ($/oz)3,4

São Bento Mine, Brazil
  Commercial Production
  Tonnes Milled
  Grade (grams/tonne)
  Cash Operating Cost ($/oz)4
  Total Cash Cost ($/oz)2,4
  Total Production Cost ($/oz)3,4

First
Quarter
2008

Second
Quarter
2008

Third
Quarter
2008

Fourth
Quarter
2008

Fourth
Quarter
2007

2008

2007

67,234
67,234
213
268
393
933

87,380
87,380
229
259
293
904

72,343
72,343
283
313
402
870

81,845
81,845
298
319
404
800

32,000
32,000
216
262
522
774

308,802
308,802
257
289
370
876

281,135
268,643
236
263
338
674

27,228
529,480
1.18
217
218
246

55,490
2,092,957
1.47
230
232
273

46,863
2,562,343
1.05
270
273
310

60,753
2,371,101
1.34
279
281
314

–
–
–
–
–
–

190,334
7,555,881
1.27
254
256
291

135,306
4,547,860
1.33
189
192
224

40,006
40,006
223,395
6.83
211
302
493

31,890
31,890
193,035
6.04
229
305
327

25,480
25,480
226,126
4.16
306
387
571

21,092
21,092
216,273
4.33
352
429
664

32,000
32,000
173,945
7.20
216
261
526

118,468
118,468
858,829
5.31
261
343
496

–
–
–
–
–
–

–
–
–
–
–
–

–
–
–
–
–
–

–
–
–
–
–
–

–
–
–
–
–
–

–
–
–
–
–
–

138,162
125,670
757,354
6.23
288
342
472

7,667
20,069
11.71
208
224
152

1  Cost figures calculated in accordance with the Gold Institute Standard.
2  Cash Operating Costs, plus royalties and the cost of off-site administration.
3  Total Cash Costs, plus foreign exchange gain or loss, depreciation, amortization and reclamation expenses.
4  Cash Operating, Total Cash and Total Production Costs are non-GAAP measures. See the section “Non-GAAP Measures” in the MD&A.  
5  Kişladağ temporarily ceased operations on August 18, 2007 and re-opened on March 6, 2008.

2008 Annual Report

7

Vineyard project in Efemçukuru, Turkey
Vineyard project in Efemçukuru, Turkey

Stakeholder and Community Relations

At Eldorado, we believe that only by taking a responsible approach can a company achieve long-term 
financial success and maintain its “social license” to operate. For us, corporate social responsibility means 
doing the right thing – investing in infrastructure, economic development, and health and education – so 
that we can help enrich the communities where we operate. 

Over the past decade, we have operated mines around the world – in Mexico, Brazil, Turkey and China. We 
are proud of our record of implementing industry best practices that minimize environmental impacts while 
maximizing social and economic benefits. 

We are committed to fostering open dialogue between ourselves and the members of the local 
communities where our mines are located. This enables us to undertake initiatives that bring positive 
impacts to communities and meet their specific needs – whether it’s creating new infrastructure, investing 
in education and training, or supporting economic development projects in the area.

In the following section, we describe our commitment to responsible operations throughout all stages of 
the mine cycle, and then highlight our initiatives relating to the environment and community development 
over the past 10 years of our operations.

8

Eldorado Gold

Committed to responsible operations throughout the life of a mine

We bring new opportunities and build value for our stakeholders at all stages of the mining cycle, from 
initial exploration through to mine closure and reclamation.  

Exploration

Development

Construction and 
Training

Mining and 
Processing

Reclamation and 
Closure

Exploration
We initiate our community relations activities in the 
early stages of the mining cycle. During exploration, 
while we conduct geological surveys and sampling 
to determine the existence and location of an ore 
deposit, we initiate dialogue with local community 
members to identify their main social and 
environmental concerns and start our baseline 
data recording. This is a period of building trust – of 
listening to our stakeholders to better understand 
their needs.

Development
During the development stage, we complete a 
feasibility study that outlines the economics, 
optimal mining method and mineral recovery 
process for the project, including closure 
considerations. It is also during this stage that 
we file an Environmental Impact Assessment 
(EIA) report with the appropriate authorities. As 
part of preparing an EIA, we conduct extensive 
environmental testing and studies to firmly 
establish baseline data and characteristics for air, 
water, soil and biodiversity. 

materialize. Depending on the communities’ needs 
and priorities, we begin infrastructure development 
initiatives that include improving roads, building 
sewage systems or drilling water wells. 

Construction and training
We train all employees and instruct construction 
contractors in the best environmental, health and 
safety practices, procedures and controls. We 
also make it a priority to hire local residents when 
recruiting new personnel. Based on our dialogue 
with the communities, we identify gaps in skills, 
provide on-the-job training and work with local 
technical schools and universities to enhance 
their mining-specific programs to help increase 
employability. 

An example of this kind of partnership was our 
agreement with the Technical School in Barão de 
Cocais, Brazil. We helped approximately 80 new 
technicians each year in the mining and mechanics 
technical programs by providing the facilities for 
their internship at our São Bento mine, until its 
closure. 

During the development stage, the results of our 
dialogue with the surrounding communities start to 

Mining and processing
All our mining operations comply with local 

Exploration activities in Brazil
Exploration activities in Brazil

Construction of the Vila Nova iron ore 
Construction of the Vila Nova iron ore 
project, Brazil
project, Brazil

Gold pour at the Kişladağ mine, Turkey
Gold pour at the Kişladağ mine, Turkey

2008 Annual Report

9

 
 
 
 
 
and international environmental standards. We 
implement the practices described in our EIA and 
our feasibility study to mitigate any potentially 
negative environmental effects of the mine’s 
construction and operation. 

We work to maintain a good safety record by 
investing in environmental, health and safety 
training. This is of considerable importance in 
mining operations, which require the use of 
hazardous materials and substances such as 
explosives and process chemicals.  

It is during this stage of a mine’s life cycle that 
communities begin to more fully benefit from the 
nearby presence of an operating mine. We employ 
approximately 1,400 employees and contractors 
worldwide, the majority of whom are from the local 
communities near our operations. The competitive 
salaries and benefits we pay our employees and 
contractors enable them to improve their families’ 
standard of living.

In addition to creating jobs in local communities, we 
promote many sustainable economic development 
initiatives. Since the life of any mine is limited, 
we encourage and work with local communities 
to create new opportunities for economic 
development, even after the mine is closed.

In Brazil, for example, we partnered with four other 
companies and the Santa Bárbara government 
to create and support the Municipal Social and 
Economic Development Agency, an organization 
mandated to help local enterprises identify and 
pursue opportunities. 

In Turkey, we donated funds to the Uşak Agricultural 
Directorate for the Sheep Genetic Improvement 
Project. Rams were distributed to the Uşak villages, 
and there has been an improvement in the quality 
of the local flocks. Community members have seen 
increased profits resulting from improved sheep 
fertility and better wool value. 

In 2008, we also launched a pilot project in 
Efemçukuru to establish a local vineyard based 
on a study conducted by a university researcher 
to identify how we could help local farmers 
obtain greater value from their crops. As part 
of the project, we planted 11,200 vines on our 
Efemçukuru property. Local farmers will benefit 

from the introduction of new technologies and best 
practices. 

Vineyard project at Efemçukuru developing mine,  Turkey
Vineyard project at Efemçukuru developing mine,  Turkey

Reclamation and closure
During the operating life of a mine, research is 
conducted to establish best reclamation practices. 
These reclamation activities are concurrent with 
mine operations.

Once a mine is no longer profitable to operate, 
we close the mine site and conduct reclamation 
activities so that the physical environment can 
successfully transition to a productive ecosystem.

We have an excellent record on 
mining closure and reclamation. 
In October 2000, we were the first 
company to receive a final full 
regulatory environmental release 
from the Mexican government 
for reclamation activities at our 
La Trinidad mine near Rosario, 
Mexico. The former mine became a 
lake capable of supporting fish.  

La Trinidad mine in Mexico
La Trinidad mine in Mexico

10 Eldorado Gold

Protecting the environment

We are committed to best practices in protecting the environment and ensuring the health and safety of 
our workers. 

Water sampling at São Bento mine, Brazil
Water sampling at São Bento mine, Brazil

Environmental Education Centre at São 
Environmental Education Centre at São 
Bento mine, Brazil
Bento mine, Brazil

Waste management at Kişladağ mine, 
Waste management at Kişladağ mine, 
Turkey
Turkey

Ongoing monitoring and analysis
We monitor the air, water and soil throughout 
the development phase of a project and during 
mine operations to ensure that our mitigation 
measures are having their intended effect. We 
share the results of our monitoring programs and 
analyses with governments and other stakeholders, 
including non-governmental organizations and local 
communities.

At our Kişladağ mine in Turkey, for example, 
we are regularly audited by the Inspection and 
Monitoring Committee – a group created by the 
Uşak government that includes members from non-
governmental organizations.

Water
We monitor and evaluate both surface and 
underground water on a monthly basis, in line 
with the local water control regulations and the 
commitments we have made in our EIA report. An 
independent agent analyzes these samples and we 
share the results with government agencies as well 
as with other stakeholders. Additionally, we conduct 
a thorough evaluation of the water samples we 
collect from strategically located monitoring wells 
to check for any changes in the underground water 
quality.

Biodiversity
To minimize the impact on the local fauna and 
flora in the areas where we operate, we invest in 
programs that help preserve native biodiversity.

At our Kişladağ gold mine in Turkey, we planted 
native trees along the mine roads and we maintain 
greenhouses around the mine area where we grow 
flowers and shrubs. We’ve also helped reforest the 
neighbouring communities. In 2002, we planted 
72,000 young trees in the Eşme area and we 
reforested Söğütiü Village/Ulubey in 2008.

In Brazil, we created a 180-hectare environmental 
preservation area inside the mine property, for 
which we received the government’s Environmental 
Preservation Award in 2004. This preservation area 
was created to safeguard and enhance habitat for 
native flora and fauna. 

The Environmental Education Centre we established 
at the site to share the results of our studies on the 
local flora and fauna has provided information to 
more than 50,000 students and teachers.

In 2008, our Tanjianshan mine 
received one of two Provincial 
Awards for Environment Friendly 
Projects from the Provincial 
Environment Protection Bureau in 
recognition of our environmental 
initiatives at the mine site.

2008 Annual Report

11

Air quality
We regularly monitor dust levels at our mine sites 
as stipulated by air quality control regulations.

Waste
We manage our waste and have implemented 
recycling programs throughout our operations.

At our Kişladağ mine, we paved the main access 
road. We also use water trucks to minimize dust on 
the mine’s internal roads during intense production 
periods, and the crushing areas include water 
sprays and filters to collect dust.

In Turkey, for example, the wastes generated by 
the operation of our Kişladağ mine are sent to a 
licensed firm authorized by the Environmental and 
Forestry Ministry to be recycled or disposed of 
according to the relevant regulations.

Noise
We use advanced equipment to monitor each site’s 
noise levels, and our employees use ear protection 
during production periods.

Worker safety
The health and safety of our workers is our top 
priority. We conduct ongoing health and safety 
training.

Kişladağ is currently the largest gold mine in Turkey
Kişladağ is currently the largest gold mine in Turkey

12 Eldorado Gold

Enhancing local communities

Our community enhancement programs have evolved out of our ongoing conversations with local 
community members. These programs are generally focused on four areas: education and training, 
infrastructure, community life and economic development.

Desks upgrade at the Agong Chunwa Tibetan 
Desks upgrade at the Agong Chunwa Tibetan 
Village Primary School, China
Village Primary School, China

Uşak Governor and Eldorado’s CEO at 
Uşak Governor and Eldorado’s CEO at 
dedication of village water system, Turkey
dedication of village water system, Turkey

Community historical heritage preservation 
Community historical heritage preservation 
close to São Bento mine, Brazil
close to São Bento mine, Brazil

Education and training

Brazil
 ▪

Preventive health and safety program: offered 
training to employees and their family members 
on health, nutrition, hygiene and safety 

 ▪

 ▪

 ▪

 ▪

 ▪

School uniforms: donated uniforms to public 
school students in Brumal and Barra Feliz

Partnership with local technical schools: 
allowed students enrolled in the mining and 
mechanics technical courses in the Barão de 
Cocais community to use our facilities during 
their internships 

Partnership with schools: welcomed students 
to our facilities so they could better understand 
the industrial application of academic subjects 
such as chemistry, mathematics and biology

Employee education: offered tutoring and 
support materials for employees to complete 
their elementary and secondary education

Volunteer tutoring: created a tutoring program 
in the public schools in Barra Feliz and 
Carrapato

China
 ▪

School facility upgrade: replaced the roof, 
improved the facilities and purchased 
equipment and books for students and 
teachers at the Agong Chunwa Tibetan Village 
Primary School

Turkey
 ▪

High school education: encouraged female 
students to complete their high school 
education in Efemçukuru’s neighbouring 
villages; five girls recently completed high 
school compared to only one the year before

 ▪

Donated computers to Ulubey College

Infrastructure

Brazil
 ▪

Provided furnishings for a court hearing room in 
Santa Bárbara

Turkey
 ▪

Helped finance a new building planned for Uşak 
University

 ▪

 ▪

 ▪

Completed in 2003 water distribution pipelines 
to bring fresh water to nine villages nearest to 
the mine

Paved all main roads in Kişladağ with 
cobblestones and conducted ongoing repairs 
and upgrades to all roads in the Gümüşkol, 
Katrancilar, and Söğütiü villages 

Installed sewage systems in Gümüşkol village 
and Ulubey, Katrancilar village and Eşme and 
Söğütiü village and Ulubey, and planned a 
similar program for Bekişli village and Eşme

2008 Annual Report

13

 
 ▪

 ▪

 ▪

 ▪

 ▪

Drilled water wells to provide potable water for 
the communities of Ulubey, Eşme, Gümüşkol, 
Katrancilar, Bekişli, Söğütiü, Küçükilyasli, 
Karaömerli, Akçaköy and Güzelköy; planned a 
similar program for Söğütiü village/Ulubey

Constructed a hemodialysis centre in Eşme 
(prior to this, people needed to travel 60 km to 
be treated in Uşak) 

Donated money to the Uşak health department 
to purchase a health scan bus for Uşak and 
surrounding villages

Repaired the Crisis Center in the village of 
Ulubey

Donated a pickup truck to the municipality 
of Kişladağ, built fire ponds to help the Uşak 
Forestry Department prevent fires, built a milk 
tank building in Gümüşkol village and Ulubey, 
built a water pump in the Omurca municipality 
and installed a septic tank in the Hasköy 
municipality

 ▪

Repaired a camera system for the Eşme police 
department to assist in crime prevention

China
 ▪

Contributed to an earthquake relief fund after 
the Sichuan earthquake in May 2008

Community life

Brazil
 ▪

Matriz de Santo Antonio: restored the 
nineteenth-century church towers as part of 
a community historical heritage preservation 
project

 ▪

 ▪

Pio XII Square: assisted in re-building this 
historical heritage square in the commercial 
centre of Santa Bárbara

Christmas party: donated toys to children in 
need in Brumal and Barra Feliz 

Turkey
 ▪

Built a football field in the Gümüşkol village/
Ulubey area, a wedding hall in Kişladağ, a 
meeting hall/village house in Katrancilar village 
and a new public house building for the imam 
in Söğütiü village/Ulubey

 ▪

Mosque repair and painting: planned repairs to 
the mosques of Söğütiü and Gümüşkol villages

Sustainable economic development 

Brazil
 ▪

Along with four other companies and the Santa 
Bárbara government, we helped establish the 
Municipal Economic and Social Development 
Agency to support socio-economic development 
in the region

Turkey
 ▪

Vineyard project in Efemçukuru: we hired a 
university professor to conduct a study on how 
we could help local farmers get more value 
from their vineyards. We recently planted 
11,200 cabernet sauvignon, merlot and syrah 
vines on our property; this may provide a 
valuable economic opportunity for local farmers 
as the vines develop and mature over the next 
five to ten years.

 ▪

 ▪

Sheep Genetic Improvement Project: we 
donated funds to Uşak Agricultural Directorate 
to distribute rams to the Uşak villages. As a 
result, there was an improvement in the quality 
of the local flocks (in terms of both improved 
fertility and better wool value) and community 
members saw increased revenues. 

Kişladağ Mine Foundation: in co-operation 
with the Canadian International Development 
Agency, we developed a business plan that 
identified initiatives with specific sustainable 
development criteria, including agriculture and 
training.

Health scan bus for Uşak and its 
Health scan bus for Uşak and its 
surrounding villages, Turkey
surrounding villages, Turkey

14 Eldorado Gold

Kişladağ's own mining fleet, Turkey
Kişladağ's own mining fleet, Turkey

Financial Review

Management’s Discussion & Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations................... 

Management’s Responsibility for Financial Reporting...........................................................................

Independent Auditors’ Report..................................................................................................................

Consolidated Balance Sheets..................................................................................................................

Consolidated Statements of Operations And Deficit..............................................................................

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.................................................................................................

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income............................................................................

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements...................................................................................

Consolidated Financial Information.........................................................................................................

16

37

38

40

41

42

43

44

82

2008 Annual Report

15

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL 
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

(For the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007)

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) reviews the business of Eldorado Gold Corporation (“Eldorado”, 
“we” or “the Company”) and compares the Company’s financial results for 2008 with those of 2007. For a 
comprehensive understanding of Eldorado’s financial condition and results of operations, you should read this MD&A 
together with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Unless otherwise noted, all monetary 
amounts are in United States dollars. This MD&A is prepared as of March 18, 2009.

1. 

2008 – Year in Review

Eldorado is one of the world’s lowest cost gold producers engaged in gold mining and related activities including 
exploration, development, extraction, processing and reclamation. Based in Vancouver, Canada, Eldorado is listed on 
the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) under the symbol ELD and on the New York Stock Exchange Amex (NYSE-A) under 
the symbol EGO. ELD is on the S&P/TSX Global Gold Index and EGO is part of the AMEX Gold BUGS Index. We own 
and operate the Kişladağ gold mine (“Kişladağ”) in Turkey and the Tanjianshan gold mine (“TJS”) in China, and we are 
developing gold projects in Turkey and Greece as well as an iron ore project in Brazil. 

During the year ended December 31, 2008, we:

 ▪

 ▪

 ▪

 ▪

 ▪

 ▪

 ▪

 ▪

 ▪

 ▪

Reported record earnings of $0.46 per share (2007 – $0.10),

Produced 308,802 ounces of gold at a cash operating cost of $257 per ounce (2007 – 281,135 ounces at $236 
per ounce),

Sold 316,918 ounces of gold at a realized average price of $876 per ounce (2007 – 266,012 ounces, $674 per 
ounce),

Resumed operations on March 6, 2008 at Kişladağ, which had been on standby since August 18, 2007, and 
completed the mine’s expansion project, doubling its mining and processing capacity to a rate of 10 million tonnes 
of ore per year,

Completed the sale of our São Bento gold mine in Brazil (“São Bento”) to AngloGold Ashanti for $70.0 million in 
AngloGold Ashanti shares, resulting in a gain of $72.5 million after consideration of net liabilities divested ($0.21 
per share),

Began construction of our Efemçukuru gold mine (“Efemçukuru”) in Turkey,

Neared completion of construction of our Vila Nova iron ore mine (“Vila Nova”) in Brazil,

Acquired Frontier Pacific Mining Corporation (“Frontier”) and its Perama Hill gold development project (“Perama 
Hill”) in Greece,

Finalized an agreement with Brazauro Resources Corporation to earn an interest in the 43,000 hectare 
Tocantinzinho gold project (“Tocantinzinho”) in Brazil and

Generated $105.5 million in cash from operating activities (2007 - $69.8 million), which was used to pay off debt 
of $70.9 million and fund ongoing development projects.

Net income for the year
In 2008, Eldorado’s profits increased substantially over the previous year. Our consolidated net income for 2008 was 
$163.7 million or $0.46 per share (2007 – $35.4 million or $0.10 per share). The main contributors to our 2008 
operating results were strong performances from Kişladağ and TJS as well as the $72.5 million gain on the sale of São 
Bento. 

16 Eldorado Gold

Sales from Kişladağ totalled 185,425 ounces of gold (2007 – 142,725 ounces) at an average price of $871 per ounce 
(2007 – $660), while cash operating costs averaged $254 per ounce (2007 – $189). Sales from TJS totalled 131,493 
ounces of gold (2007 – 112,646 ounces) at an average price of $884 per ounce (2007 – $694), while cash operating 
costs averaged $261 per ounce (2007 – $288). 

Net income for the fourth quarter
Our consolidated net income for Q4 2008 was $100.7 million or $0.27 per share (Q4 2007 – net loss of $9.1 million 
or $0.03 per share). Excluding the $72.5 million gain on the sale of São Bento, our consolidated net income was 
$28.2 million or $0.08 per share. Gold revenues for Q4 2008 increased 159% compared to Q4 2007 due to higher 
selling prices and increased ounces sold. Selling prices during Q4 2008 increased 3% and units sold increased 
48,063 ounces, or 151%, compared to Q4 2007. Kişladağ operations shut down on August 18, 2007 and remained 
shut down during all of Q4 2007, resulting in lower gold production for that quarter. Operating costs for Q4 2008 
were $25.9 million, an increase of 187% over Q4 2007 due to the shutdown of the Kişladağ during Q4 2007. Costs of 
sales per ounce increased at TJS as a result of lower grades and recoveries from transitional ore at the newly opened 
Jinlonggou pit (“JLG”) as well as higher stripping costs.

Financial position
Gold has maintained its value during the current global economic crisis, with average prices up 30% as compared to 
2007. In 2008, we sold 19% more ounces of gold than in 2007, at an average realized gold price of $876 per ounce, a 
30% increase from 2007. In general, unit costs of our Turkish and Chinese operations have increased due to inflation 
and operational factors, offset at Kişladağ by gains from the weakening of the Turkish lira relative to the US dollar and 
at TJS by the shift to contract mining. The Turkish lira weakened by 20% relative to the US dollar during the second 
half of 2008. A beneficiary of the current economic crisis is the US dollar, which has gained relative to a number of 
currencies since August 2008.

While Eldorado’s financial performance has not been negatively impacted, the economic downturn has adversely 
affected other exploration stage or intermediate mining companies in which Eldorado holds equity interests. In the 
fourth quarter, we recorded an impairment loss of $0.5 million relating to an other than temporary decline in the 
fair value of one of our investments. Additionally, we recorded a $5.9 million charge to other comprehensive losses 
related to unrealized losses on two of our investments. As part of our growth strategy, we will continue to leverage our 
resources by making strategic equity investments. Investments in marketable securities available-for-sale represented 
1.3% of our total assets as at December 31, 2008. 

Eldorado is well positioned to confront the current economic crisis with strong cash reserves and no long-term debt. At 
December 31, 2008, we held $61.9 million in cash and short-term deposits (2007 – $46.0 million), had no restricted 
cash or long-term debt (2007 – $65.7 million restricted cash, $65.5 million long-term debt) and had an environmental 
guarantee deposit of $2.5 million (2007 – $8.3 million). The reduction in the environmental guarantee is the result of 
obtaining a favourable bank guarantee. We remain hedge free.

Corporate developments
Frontier acquisition
On July 7, 2008, we completed the acquisition of Frontier. Under the terms of the agreement, each Frontier common 
share was exchanged for 0.122 common shares of Eldorado, CA$0.0001 in cash and one Exchange Receipt. Each 
Exchange Receipt entitles the holder to receive an additional 0.008 Eldorado common shares if, prior to July 1, 2009, 
a Joint Ministerial Resolution is issued in Greece by the Joint Ministerial Council (comprised of the ministries of the 
Environment, Agriculture, Development and Health) accepting the Environmental Terms of Reference drafted by the 
Ministry of Environment regarding Perama Hill.

2008 Annual Report

17

 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL 
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Eldorado issued 20,339,334 common shares and paid $0.02 million in cash in connection with this transaction. No 
value was assigned to the Exchange Receipts as we believe it is highly unlikely that the condition for their exchange 
into Eldorado shares will be met. The total consideration paid for Frontier was valued at $158.6 million and Eldorado 
incurred acquisition costs of $3.9 million. 

This transaction was accounted for as an asset acquisition because Frontier was in the development stage. Eldorado’s 
consolidated financial statements include 100% of Frontier results from July 7, 2008.

This acquisition affected our balance sheet as is explained in Note 4 of the consolidated financial statements. We 
recorded a future tax liability of $51.4 million, which results from an imputed income tax liability we incurred due to the 
difference between the allocated fair values and tax values of the property, plant and equipment assets we acquired.

Brazauro agreement
On July 8, 2008, Eldorado entered into an option agreement with Brazauro Resources Corporation (“Brazauro”) under 
which Eldorado can acquire from Brazauro a 60% to 75% interest in Tocantinzinho in Brazil in return for purchasing 
Brazauro securities (“units”), undertaking $9.5 million of exploration and development expenditures and paying 
Brazauro $90.0 million plus a production decision fee of up to $10.0 million. On July 24, 2008, Eldorado subscribed 
for 8,800,000 units of Brazauro at a price of C$0.95 per unit. Each unit includes one common share of Brazauro and 
one warrant. Each warrant will entitle the holder to acquire one-half of one common share of Brazauro at a price of 
C$1.30 per share for a period of 18 months. 

The purchase price of the 8,800,000 units was allocated between marketable securities and mineral interest based 
on the fair value of the Brazauro units on July 18, 2008 – the date that Eldorado notified Brazauro of its decision to 
proceed with the transaction. The fair value of the units of $4.9 million was recorded in marketable securities while the 
value of the option of $3.4 million was record in mineral interest.

São Bento divestiture
On December 15, 2008, we completed the sale of São Bento to AngloGold Ashanti (“AngloGold”) for $70.0 million 
payable by the issuance of 2,701,660 common shares of AngloGold, resulting in a gain on the sale of $72.5 million 
after consideration of net liabilities divested. As of December 31, 2008, we had sold 1,566,500 AngloGold shares for 
cash of $25.5 million and accounts receivable of $16.2 million, generating a gain on disposal of $1.1 million over the 
cost of the shares. The remaining 1,135,160 shares were valued at $31.5 million at December 31, 2008 and reported 
as Marketable Securities on the Balance Sheet. The shares generated an unrealized gain of $2.0 million when marked 
to the market price at year-end. All of the remaining shares were sold in January 2009.

18 Eldorado Gold

2. 

Production

OPERATING DATA 1

2008

2007

2006

TOTAL GOLD PRODUCTION
Total ounces produced
Commercial production
Cash operating costs ($/oz) 4
Total cash cost ($/oz) 2, 4
Total production cost ($/oz) 3, 4

KISLADAG MINE, TURKEY 5
Commercial production
Cash operating costs ($/oz) 4
Total cash cost ($/oz) 2, 4
Total production cost ($/oz) 3, 4

TANJIANSHAN MINE, CHINA 6

Total ounces produced
Commercial production
Cash operating costs ($/oz) 4
Total cash cost ($/oz) 2, 4
Total production cost ($/oz) 3, 4

SAO BENTO MINE, BRAZIL 7
Commercial production
Cash operating costs ($/oz) 4
Total cash cost ($/oz) 2, 4
Total production cost ($/oz) 3, 4

 308,802 
 308,802 
$          257 
$          289 
$          370 

 190,334 
$          254 
$          256 
$          291 

 118,468 
 118,468 
$          261 
$          343 
$          496 

 – 
$               – 
$               – 
$               – 

 281,135 
 268,643 
$          236 
$          263 
$          338 

 135,306 
$          189 
$          192 
$          224 

 138,162 
 125,670 
$          288 
$          342 
$          472 

 7,667 
$          208 
$          224 
$          152 

 135,653 
 135,653 
$          324 
$          330 
$          343 

 70,895 
$          206 
$          208 
$          229 

 n/a 
 n/a 
 n/a 
 n/a 
 n/a 

 64,758 
$          454 
$          464 
$          467 

Notes
1  Cost figures calculated in accordance with the Gold Institute Standard.
2  Cash operating costs, plus royalties and off-site administration costs.
3  Total cash costs, plus foreign exchange gain or loss, depreciation, amortization and reclamation expenses.
4  Cash operating, total cash and total production costs are non-GAAP measures. See the section “Non-GAAP Measures” of this MD&A.
5  The Kişladağ mine temporarily ceased operations on August 18, 2007 and reopened on March 6, 2008.
6  The Tanjianshan mine began commercial production on February 1, 2007.
7  Q2 2007 was the last quarter of production at the São Bento mine.

3. 

Operations

Tanjianshan mine
In 2008, we milled a total of 858,829 tonnes of ore at TJS at an average grade of 5.31 g/t, resulting in 118,468 
ounces of gold produced at an average cash operating cost of $261 per ounce.

Capital expenditures for the year were $38.9 million, with the majority of the capital spending allocated to the Phase II 
construction program. At completion, Phase II will include a sulphide ore processing facility to treat sulphide ore from 
the newly opened JLG pit as well as an expanded tailings dam. Commissioning is expected in the first quarter of 2009. 

The mining contractor operated to expectations in 2008, validating our decision to move to contract mining.

2008 Annual Report

19

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL 
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Kişladağ mine
During 2008, approximately 7,555,881 tonnes of ore were placed on the leach pad at Kişladağ at an average grade 
of 1.27 g/t, and we produced 190,334 ounces of gold at an average cash operating cost of $254 per ounce. Mining 
operations resumed on March 6, 2008 after a court injunction forced the mine to close on August 18, 2007.

Capital expenditures for the year were $27.3 million, with capital spending allocated to mobile equipment for plant 
and infrastructure upgrades ($11.3 million), an excavator and trucks ($5.2 million), the lime project ($3.4 million), 
geological core drilling ($2.3 million) and a 200 tonne process crane ($1.7 million). The remaining $3.4 million 
consisted of smaller purchases and upgrades.

4. 

Development

Efemçukuru
We drilled 1,519 meters at Efemçukuru in 2008. Of this, 961 meters were to explore the down plunge and along-strike 
extensions of the North Ore Shoot and 558 meters were for geotechnical purposes to support detailed mine designs. 

We received forestry permits during the year covering all the forestry land needed for construction. By the end of 2008, 
we had completed the new access road to the site and had cleared and grubbed the plant site, rock dump and tailings 
area. We began constructing the north and south underground portals during the year, as well as the access road and 
pad for the north portal. We have ordered items with long lead times, such as the ball and SAG mills, and we have 
finalized the process design criteria. We negotiated the contract for underground pre-production development and 
awarded it to a Turkish contractor. Manpower increased significantly as staff positions were filled during the year.

At the end of 2008, we had purchased approximately 78% of the land required for operations. An expropriation 
decree was awarded to our wholly owned subsidiary, Tüprag Metal Madencilik Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (“Tüprag”) that 
will allow the company to acquire the remaining private land at a price set by the government. During the year, the 
Fourth Administrative Court in Izmir ruled in favour of the Environmental Positive Opinion issued by the Ministry of 
Environment and Forestry for the project.

Capital spending at Efemçukuru in 2008 was $14.3 million.

Vila Nova iron ore
On February 25, 2008, we received a construction permit issued by the Environmental Agency of Amapa State for the 
Vila Nova Iron Ore project and we were able to start construction and development activities. 

During 2008, the majority of the construction was completed, including the crushing and screening plant, the run of 
mine (“ROM”) and finished product stockpiles, and the tailings impoundment area. We finished clearing the open pit, 
stockpiled topsoil and took delivery of all the major mining equipment, which is ready for use. We drilled a total of 
2,708 meters during the year for metallurgical characterization and mine planning, and we are continuing negotiations 
on the sale of the iron ore.

5. 

Exploration

In 2008, exploration costs increased to $19.7 million (2007 – $14.6 million) as we expanded our exploration activities 
in Brazil, Turkey, China and the USA. Included in these costs were $7.4 million (2007 – $3.0 million) in deferred 
exploration costs reported in mineral interests on the balance sheet. Exclusive of stock-based compensation costs of 
$1.4 million, we incurred exploration expenditures of $8.7 million in Turkey, $3.4 million in China, $3.1 million in Brazil, 
$1.1 million in the USA and $2.0 million in other locations.

20 Eldorado Gold

Turkey
Our main reconnaissance focus in 2008 was on the Sayacik project, adjacent to Kişladağ. Work included detailed 
mapping, a magnetic geophysical survey and soil geochemical sampling. Program planning and government permitting 
processes were also begun for planned drill testing in 2009. We also conducted work on properties in the Central and 
Eastern Pontide regions of Turkey that included stream sampling and general mapping/prospecting. Positive results 
were obtained for the Arpali porphyry project and further work is planned in 2009. 

At Efemçukuru, we completed 7 drill holes totalling 1,292 meters over the North Ore Shoot. The holes successfully 
intersected precious metal and base metal rich intercepts down plunge from current limits. Detailed mapping and soil 
geochemical sampling programs were also carried out over the property.

We executed a 45 hole, 16,586 meter exploration drilling program at Kişladağ. Results outlined areas of new oxide 
mineralization in the southeast portion of the deposit and confirmed lateral extensions of sulphide mineralization to 
the southeast and west. 

Brazil
Our exploration efforts in Brazil focused on general reconnaissance of prospective lands in the Carajas and 
Tapajos regions of Para state. During Q4 2008, emphasis switched to managing an infill diamond drill campaign 
at Tocantinzinho as part of our joint venture commitment with Brazauro Resources. We drilled 3,518 meters in 11 
diamond drill holes by year-end. Results confirmed extent and predicted gold grades in areas of inferred mineral 
resources. 

China
We completed 70 drill holes totalling 15,500 meters at TJS during 2008. Most of the drilling tested the Xijinggou 
and Qinlongtan (“QLT”) areas of the property. Xijinggou drilling outlined two main areas of gold mineralization on 
which inferred mineral resources were estimated at year-end. QLT drilling proved the presence of a dip reversal in the 
mineralized zone below the open pit floor.

USA
We conducted mapping, soil geochemical sampling and ground magnetic geophysical surveys on our joint venture 
projects with AuEx Ventures (Buffalo Canyon, Green Monster, Hays Canyon and Klondike North). We also executed 
a reverse circulation drill program on one of the projects, Klondike North, where drilling totalled 2,584 meters in 12 
holes.

6. 

Legal

Kişladağ 
On February 28, 2008, the Turkish Ministry of Environment and Forestry and Eldorado’s subsidiary Tüprag (as co-
defendant) filed an appeal requesting the 6th Department of the High Administrative Court reconsider its February 
6 decision on the essence of the Kişladağ EIA case. This appeal is now at the high administrative court waiting for 
consideration. There has been no change in the status of the case since the first quarter of 2008.

Efemçukuru
On January 26, 2009, the Sixth Department of the High Administrative Court in Ankara, Turkey delivered a favourable 
decision for the Company in cases by certain third parties seeking to cancel the Environmental Positive Certificate for 
Efemçukuru issued by the Turkish Ministry of Environment and Forestry.

2008 Annual Report

21

  
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL 
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

7. 

Review of Financial Results

Net income
Our consolidated net income for 2008 was $163.7 million or $0.46 per share (2007 – $35.4 million or $0.10 per 
share). Strong performances from Kişladağ and TJS as well as the $72.5 million ($0.21 per share) gain on the sale of 
São Bento, were the main factors in explaining our record net income. Additionally, net income was positively affected 
by a $9.2 million decrease in future income tax related to a 20% reduction in Greek income tax rates.

Gold revenues
Our gold revenues consist of gold bullion sales at spot. We sell the refined bullion either to large financial institutions 
or on the Istanbul and Shanghai Gold Exchanges.

Gold revenues in 2008 increased 55% over 2007 due to increases in both selling prices and sales volumes. Selling 
prices in 2008 increased 30% over 2007, and ounces sold in 2008 increased 19% over 2007, reflecting increased 
production from Kişladağ and TJS.

Gold ounces sold
Kişladağ
Tanjianshan
São Bento
Total gold ounces sold
Average selling price per ounce
Gold revenues (000s)

2008

2007

2006

 185,425 
 131,493 
 - 
 316,918 
$       876.32 
$     277,723 

 142,725 
 112,646 
 10,641 
 266,012 
$       674.04 
$     179,302 

 63,352 
 – 
 64,200 
 127,552 
$     608.70 
$     77,641 

Interest and other income
Interest income earned on cash, short-term money market investments and restricted cash balances held during 2008 
was $2.9 million (2007 – $7.5 million). The decrease in interest income from 2007 was the result of lower average 
cash balances during 2008 as well as a decline in interest rates. Other income of $7.6 million in 2008 (2007 – $1.9 
million) was related to the sale of excess electricity at São Bento as well as Brazilian tax credits resulting from the spin-
off of Vila Nova from São Bento prior to the sale of São Bento to AngloGold. 

Operating costs
Operating costs in 2008 increased 27% over 2007 due to increased sales volumes and higher costs of production 
at Kişladağ. At Kişladağ, production costs increased due to increased lime consumption, as ore with higher sulphide 
content was treated on the leach pad. Production costs at TJS were lower than 2007 as a result of lower mining costs 
related to the change from Company-owned mining equipment to contract mining, as well as lower strip ratios at the 
QLT pit.

Depletion, depreciation and amortization
Depletion, depreciation and amortization (“DD&A”) expense of $26.0 million (2007 – $20.0 million) was higher than 
2007 due to higher volumes of ore processed at Kişladağ.

General and administrative
General and administrative costs reflect the costs of our head office in Vancouver, Canada, as well as our liaison 
offices in Ankara, Turkey and Beijing, China. We have continued to add to our administrative staff to support expanding 

22 Eldorado Gold

international operations. General and administrative expense of $38.3 million increased $11.5 million over 2007, 
primarily due to higher stock-based compensation costs allocated to general administrative expense, and the addition 
of administrative staff in Vancouver.

Exploration expense
Exploration activities are discussed in the section “Exploration” of this MD&A. 

Mine standby costs
Mine standby costs of $2.4 million reflected the costs of maintaining Kişladağ while it was shut down in Q1 2008 
(2007 – $6.6 million). 

Asset retirement obligation costs
Asset retirement obligation costs in 2008 of $3.1 million reflected a $2.5 million revision to estimated future 
reclamation costs at São Bento prior to its sale (2007 – $0.6 million). 

Foreign exchange (gain) loss
We reported a foreign exchange loss of $0.2 million in 2008 (2007 – $4.7 million gain). Foreign exchange losses in 
Brazil and China were partially offset by foreign exchange gains in Greece and Turkey. The major factor in the foreign 
exchange gains was the revaluation of future income tax liabilities denominated in non-US currencies into US dollars.

Gain on disposal of assets
We reported a net gain on the disposal of assets totalling $70.8 million (2007 – $3.6 million). The net gain included a 
$72.5 million gain on the sale of São Bento and a $1.7 million loss on the disposal of mining equipment at TJS. 

Gain on marketable securities
In 2008 we reported a net gain on marketable securities of $2.5 million (2007 – $0.2 million). The net gain included 
a $1.1 realized gain on the sale of AngloGold shares, a $2.0 unrealized gain on AngloGold shares marked to market at 
year-end, a $0.5 million impairment adjustment to the carrying value of marketable securities treated as available for 
sale financial instruments and a $0.1 million unrealized loss in other marketable securities held for trading. 

Interest and financing costs
Interest expense in 2008 was $2.9 million, compared to $3.4 million in 2007, reflecting the decrease in interest rates 
and the repayment of debt in during the year.

Unrealized gain on derivative contract
In 2007 we recorded a $3.0 million asset, reflecting the fair value of an energy contract related to São Bento, which we 
concluded was a derivative financial instrument. This resulted in the recognition of an unrealized gain in 2007 of $2.1 
million. In 2008 we charged $3.0 million to loss on derivative contract as the life of the contract had expired prior to 
the sale of São Bento.

Income taxes
Current income tax expense for 2008 was $25.4 million (2007 – $4.8 million). Tax expense by country was: Turkey 
– $14.4 million (2007 – nil), China – $6.9 million (2007 – $4.8 million) and Brazil – $4.1 million (2007 – nil). Tax 
expense in Turkey was nil in 2007 due to the mine shutdown of Kişladağ in the second half of the year. Tax expense 
in China increased due to higher profits. Tax expense in Brazil related to a taxable gain that was triggered by the 
repayment of intercompany debt as part of the Vila Nova spin-off prior to the sale of São Bento. The taxes due in Brazil 
were completely offset by tax credits from prior years.

2008 Annual Report

23

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL 
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Future income tax recovery for 2008 was $12.9 million (2007 – expense $17.3 million). Future tax recovery (expense) 
by country was: Turkey – $3.5 million expense (2007 – $9.5 million expense), China – $3.4 million expense (2007 – 
$3.2 million expense), Brazil – $9.5 million recovery (2007 – $4.6 million expense), Greece – $10.3 million recovery 
(2007 – no Greek business investment). Future tax recovery in Brazil related to the reversal of unrealized foreign 
exchange gains on intercompany loans, while future income tax recovery in Greece related to the reduction of the 
Greek tax rate from 25% to 20%.

The two major factors causing the effective tax rate to decline from 38.41% in 2007 to 6.90% in 2008 are the tax-free 
gain from the sale of São Bento and the reduction of the future income tax recorded on the Frontier acquisition due to 
a reduction in the Greek future income tax rates from 25% to 20%.

Non-controlling interest
We reported a charge of $5.1 million in 2008 related to our joint venture partners’ 10% interest in TJS (2007 – nil).

8. 

Summary of Quarterly Results

Revenue
Net income (loss)
Earnings (loss) per share (US$)

Basic
Diluted

($000 except per share amounts)

Year ended December 31, 2008

4th Quarter
65,148
100,724

3rd Quarter
68,238
17,040

2nd Quarter
82,462
25,155

1st Quarter
72,383
20,737

0.27
0.27

0.05
0.05

0.07
0.07

0.06
0.06

Revenue
Net income (loss)
Earnings (loss) per share (US$)

Basic
Diluted

4th Quarter
28,512
(9,105)

(0.03)

 -

Year ended December 31, 2007

3rd Quarter
40,038
5,213

2nd Quarter
76,662
26,731

1st Quarter
43,487
12,582

0.02
0.02

0.08
0.08

0.04
0.04

The first quarter of 2007 included the first two months of commercial production at TJS. The third and fourth quarter of 
2007 were impacted by the temporary shutdown of Kişladağ resulting from the suspension of operations from August 
18, 2007 to March 6, 2008. The fourth quarter of 2008 included the $72.5 million gain ($0.21 per share) on the sale 
of São Bento.

9. 

Outlook

Eldorado plans to produce 325,000 to 340,000 ounces in 2009 at a cash operating cost of approximately $300 per 
ounce. Production is expected to increase at Kişladağ by approximately 40,000 to 50,000 ounces from the 2008 total 
of 190,334 ounces as a result of operating the mine for a full year. On the other hand, production at TJS is expected 
to decrease approximately 20,000 ounces from the 2008 total of 118,468 ounces due to an expected decrease in 
Q1 2009 production resulting from the commissioning of the sulphide ore processing facility. Assumptions used to 

24 Eldorado Gold

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
forecast total cash costs for 2009 include: exchange rates of Cdn$1.10 = US$1.00, Brazilian Real 2.00 = US$1.00, 
Turkish Lira 1.45 = US$1.00, and Chinese RMB 6.50 = US$1.00; and diesel fuel = US$1.52 per liter (Kişladağ only).

Capital expenditures for 2009 are forecast at $117.1 million, including $84.8 million at Efemçukuru, $11.1 million 
at TJS, $10.0 million at Kişladağ, $10.6 million at Vila Nova and $0.6 in other. Exploration expenditures in 2009 are 
expected to amount to $18.4 million, of which $12.4 million will be expensed, with efforts focused on Tocantinzinho, 
TJS and general exploration in Turkey. General and administrative expense is forecast at $31.6 million for the year. 
Depreciation and depletion expense is expected to be $34.0 million, and we anticipate an overall effective tax rate of 
30%.

10. 

Financial Instruments and Related Risks

Eldorado manages its exposure to financial risks, including liquidity risk, credit risk, currency risk, interest rate risk and 
price risk, through a risk management review process. On a quarterly basis, management prepares a risk assessment 
report outlining the Company’s operational and financial risks. The Company’s Board of Directors reviews this report 
with management to evaluate and assess the risks Eldorado is exposed to in various markets and the steps that 
the Company takes to protect itself against adverse price movements. All transactions undertaken are to support 
the Company’s ongoing business. Eldorado does not acquire or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or 
speculative purposes.

The following section describes the types of risks that the Company is exposed to and its objectives and policies for 
managing these risk exposures.

Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will encounter difficulty in meeting obligations associated with financial 
liabilities. Eldorado has a rigorous planning, budgeting and forecasting process to help determine the funds required 
to support its normal operating requirements on an ongoing basis and its expansion plans. The Company believes 
that its anticipated cash flows from operations and its holdings of cash and cash equivalents are sufficient to meet its 
obligations in 2009 and beyond. 

At December 31, 2008, we held $61.8 million in cash and cash equivalents (December 2007 – $46.0 million) and $nil 
in restricted collateral accounts (December 2007 – $65.7 million), which securitize debt of $nil (December 2007 – 
$65.0 million).

Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk that the counterparty to a financial instrument will cause a financial loss for the Company by 
failing to discharge its obligations. Credit risk is primarily associated with trade receivables; however, it also arises 
on cash and cash equivalents. To mitigate exposure to credit risk on financial assets, we have established policies to 
ensure counterparties demonstrate minimum acceptable credit worthiness and to ensure liquidity of available funds. 
The Company also monitors its concentration of credit risk.

Eldorado closely monitors its financial assets. We sell our products exclusively to large international financial 
institutions and other organizations with strong credit ratings, and payment is normally in advance or within one week 
of receipt of shipment. The historical level of customer defaults is negligible, and as a result, the credit risk associated 
with trade receivables at December 31, 2008 is considered to be negligible. We invest our cash and cash equivalents 
in major financial institutions and in government issuances in accordance with our short-term investment policy, and 
the credit risk associated with our investments is considered to be low. 

As a result of current global financial conditions, numerous financial institutions have gone into bankruptcy or have 
been rescued by government authorities. As such, the Company is subject to the risk of loss of its deposits with 

2008 Annual Report

25

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL 
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

financial institutions that hold the Company’s cash. As at December 31, 2008, approximately 55% of the Company’s 
cash and cash equivalents were with one financial institution.

Eldorado’s maximum exposure to credit risk at December 31 was as follows:

Cash and cash equivalents
Accounts receivable

($000s)

2008

61,851
36,109

2007

46,014
28,720

The increase in accounts receivable from 2007 related to the sale of AngloGold shares in the amount of $16.2 million. 
This balance was received in January 2009. The remaining balance related to Turkish value added tax credits and 
subsidies, mining contractor advances and prepaid land leases and insurance premiums.

Market risk

a. 

Currency risk

Currency risk is the risk that the fair values or future cash flows of the Company’s financial instruments will 
fluctuate because of changes in foreign exchange rates. Exchange rate fluctuations may affect the costs that 
Eldorado incurs in its operations. Gold is sold in US dollars and the Company’s costs are incurred principally in 
US dollars, Canadian dollars, Turkish lira, Brazilian real and Chinese renminbi. The appreciation of non-US dollar 
currencies against the US dollar can increase the cost of gold production and capital expenditures in US dollar 
terms. We also hold cash and cash equivalents that are denominated in non-US dollar currencies that are subject 
to currency risk. Accounts receivable and other current and long-term assets denominated in non-US dollars 
relate to goods and services taxes, income taxes, value added taxes and insurance receivables. As a result of 
the acquisitions of Afcan Mining Corporation (“Afcan”) and Frontier assets in 2005 and 2008 respectively, we 
recorded $56.6 million of future income tax liabilities on mining interests that are recorded in local currencies. 
The future income tax liabilities are monetary items that are revalued each period-end at current exchange rates, 
with the gain or loss recorded in net earnings in the period.

The Company is exposed to currency risk through the following financial assets and liabilities, value added tax 
and other taxes recoverable and future income tax asset and liabilities denominated in currencies other than US 
dollars at December 31, 2008:

Cash and cash equivalents
Marketable securities
Accounts receivable and 
other

Future income tax 
receivable

Canadian 
dollar
 4,618 
 14,804 
 1,902 

 -   

Accounts payable and 
accrued liabilities
Future Income tax liabilities
Net balance
Equivalent in US dollars

 (8,549)

 -   
 12,775 
 10,489 

26 Eldorado Gold

Australian 
dollar

 70 
 -   
 78 

 -   

 -   

($000s)
Turkish        
lira
 1,280 
 -   
 12,733 

Chinese 
renminbi
 48,453 
 -   
 44,426 

Euro

 139 
 -   
 357 

Brazilian 
real
 3,487 

Peruvian 
sol
 415 

 830 

 -   

 -   

 -   

 -   

 1,197 

 -   

 (153)

(14,233)

(155,879)

 (2,113)

 (165)

 -   
 148 
 103 

(26,390)
 (26,047)
(36,462)

(15,302)
(15,522)
 (10,140)

 (88,144)
(149,947)
 (22,025)

 (2,826)
 (622)
 (277)

 -   
 250 
 112 

During the year ended December 31, 2008, Eldorado recognized a loss of $0.2 million (2007 – $4.7 million gain) 
on foreign exchange. Included in this amount was a $4.0 million gain resulting from the revaluation of future 
income taxes denominated in currencies other than US dollars (2007 – nil). Based on the above net exposures 
at December 31, 2008, a 10% depreciation or appreciation of the above currencies against the US dollar would 
result in a $5.8 million increase or decrease in our after-tax net earnings. Eldorado currently does not hedge to 
reduce risks associated with currency fluctuation.

b. 

Interest rate risk

Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair values and future cash flows of the Company will fluctuate because of 
changes in market interest rates. The Company’s debt is not exposed to interest rate cash flow risk as the interest 
rate has been fixed at the time of each drawdown. As at December 31, 2008, Eldorado had an outstanding $0.1 
million debt to Sino Gold Mining Limited (“Sino Gold”) related to our acquisition of Afcan. The approximate average 
interest rate earned by the Company in 2008 on its cash and cash equivalents was 2.36% (2007 – 5.17%). A 10% 
increase or decrease in the interest earned from financial institutions on deposits and money market investments 
held at December 31, 2008 would result in a $0.1 million increase or decrease in our after-tax net earnings.

The status of our financing arrangements and obligations is as follows:

In April 2005, Tüprag entered into a $65.0 million term revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) 
with HSBC due February 28, 2010. The Revolving Credit Facility is secured by Eldorado cash deposits in restricted 
accounts equivalent to the HSBC advances to Tüprag. The Revolving Credit Facility bears interest fixed at the 
prevailing LIBOR on the date of the draw plus 0.50%. As at December 31, 2008, the Company has repaid all the 
amounts drawn previously on the facility.

At December 31, 2008, $65.0 million remained available under the Revolving Credit Facility.

In November 2007, our 90% owned subsidiary QDML entered into a $15.0 million revolving facility (“the Facility”) 
with HSBC Bank (China). The Facility has a term of one year and is subject to annual review and renewal. In 
November 2008, the Facility was renewed for a second year and the interest rate is fixed at 1.2 times the 
prevailing lending rate stipulated by the People’s Bank of China. 

At December 31, 2008, $15.0 million remained available under the Revolving Credit Facility. Subsequent to year-
end, QDML drew down $5.0 million under the Facility.

c. 

Price risk

Price risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of the Company’s financial instruments will fluctuate 
because of changes in market prices. Eldorado’s profitability depends on the price of gold, which is affected by 
numerous factors such as the sale or purchase of gold by various central banks and financial institutions, interest 
rates, exchange rates, inflation or deflation, fluctuations in the value of the US dollar and foreign currencies, 
global and regional supply and demand, and the political and economic conditions of the world’s major gold-
producing countries. A 10% increase or decrease in the price of gold would result in approximately a $20.0 million 
increase or decrease in our after-tax net earnings based on the expectations and assumptions we used in our 
2009 outlook.

At present, Eldorado does not hedge gold sales.

The costs relating to Eldorado’s production, development and exploration activities vary depending on the market 
prices of certain mining consumables, including diesel fuel and electricity. A 10% increase or decrease in diesel 

2008 Annual Report

27

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL 
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

fuel market prices would result in approximately a $1.0 million decrease or increase in our after-tax net earnings. 
We are evaluating a hedge against diesel fuel price fluctuations. Electricity is regionally priced in Turkey and China 
and semi-regulated by the federal governments of those countries. The regulation of electricity reduces the risk of 
price fluctuations and we therefore do not contemplate entering into contracts to hedge against such risk.

Defined benefit plans
During the year ended December 31, 2008, the company implemented a defined benefit pension program with 
two components: a registered pension plan (“the Pension Plan”) and a non-registered supplementary pension plan 
(“the SERP”). These plans, which are only available to certain qualifying employees, provide benefits based on 
an employee’s years of service and final average earnings at retirement. Annual contributions to these plans are 
actuarially determined and made at or in excess of minimum requirements prescribed by legislation. The Company is 
not required to pre-fund any benefit obligation under the SERP. Total cash payments for pension benefits for 2008, 
including cash contributed to the Pension Plan and the SERP were $3.8 million. We expect to contribute $0.1 million to 
the Pension Plan and $1.3 million to the SERP in 2009 based on minimum funding requirements. 

Capital resources
During the year ended December 31, 2008, Eldorado invested $124.0 million in capital expenditures and mine 
development. At Kişladağ, capital expenditures totalling $27.3 million related mostly to the Phase II expansion 
program. Capital expenditures at Tanjianshan totalling $38.9 million related to the sulphide ore processing 
construction project and stripping of the JLG pit. At Efemçukuru, development expenditures totalled $14.3 million, 
while at Vila Nova we spent $31.0 million on mine construction and development. We also spent $5.3 million on 
Tocantinzinho (including $3.4 million related to the Brazauro units purchased as part of the option agreement) and 
$4.2 million on mineral licenses in Turkey. The remaining $3.0 million of expenditures relate to Perama Hill, and the 
acquisition of fixed assets in Vancouver, Canada and Ankara, Turkey.

During Q4 2008 we received $25.5 million on the sale of AngloGold shares.

In 2008, we received net proceeds of $14.7 million in consideration for issuing 3,730,155 common shares related to 
the exercise of stock options.

At December 31, 2008, we had cash and cash equivalents of $61.8 million and working capital of $184.8 million, 
compared with $46.0 million of cash and cash equivalents and working capital of $97.6 million at the beginning of the 
year. In the opinion of management, the working capital at December 31, 2008, together with future cash flows from 
operations, is sufficient to support the Company’s commitments. The Company’s total planned capital expenditures for 
2009, with a focus on bringing Efemçukuru to commercial production by Q3 2010, are forecasted to be $117.1 million. 
These expenditures will be funded partly by cash flows from operations and partly from the sales proceeds of the 
AngloGold Ashanti shares received by the Company from the sale of São Bento.

Looking beyond 2009, Eldorado’s cash flows from operations are expected to significantly increase with commercial 
production at Efemçukuru and are expected to be sufficient to support currently planned expansions and growth.

Acquisitions of additional mineral resource properties may require additional capital. Our ability to pursue growth 
through acquisitions will depend on our ability to obtain financing through joint venture projects, debt financing and 
equity financing or other means. There is no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining the required financing.

Contractual obligations and guarantees
In the normal course of business, we enter into contracts that give rise to commitments for future minimum payments. 
The following table summarizes the remaining contractual maturities of our financial liabilities and operating and 
capital commitments at December 31, 2008:

28 Eldorado Gold

Debt
Capital leases
Operating leases
Purchase obligations
Totals

($000s)

2009

2010

2011

2012

150
65
2,336
33,805
36,356

-
65
2,016
11,557
13,638

-
36
1,877
11,498
13,411

-
23
1,860
11,476
13,359

2013 and 
later
-
-
2,140
-
2,140

Total

150
189
10,229
68,336
78,904

Purchase obligations from 2010 forward relate solely to Kişladağ, including the estimated commitments under the 
unhedged diesel fuel purchase commitments for 2010 through 2012. Imputed interest relating to the Sino Gold loan is 
included in the debt commitment.

11. 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

None.

12. 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires 
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and 
disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues 
and expenditures during the reporting period. Management has identified the following critical accounting policies 
and estimates. Note 2 of the Company’s consolidated financial statements describe all of the significant accounting 
policies.

Inventories
Finished goods, work-in-process, heap leach ore and stockpiled ore are valued at the lower of average production cost 
and net realizable value.

We record the cost of mining ore stacked on our leach pads and in process at our mines as work-in-process inventory, 
which we value at the lower of cost and estimated net realizable value. These costs are charged to earnings and 
included in cost of sales on the basis of ounces of gold recovered. The assumptions used to value work-in-process 
inventories include estimates of gold contained in the ore stacked on leach pads, assumptions of the amount of 
gold stacked that is expected to be recovered from the leach pads, the amount of gold in the mill circuits and an 
assumption of the gold price expected to be realized when the gold is recovered. If these estimates or assumptions 
prove inaccurate, we could be required to write down the recorded value of our work-in-process inventories, which 
would reduce our earnings and working capital. At December 31, 2008, the average cost of inventory was significantly 
below its net realizable value. 

Reserves and resources
Mineral reserves and resources are calculated in accordance with National Instrument 43-101, as required by 
Canadian Securities regulatory authorities. For United States reporting purposes, Industry Guide 7 (under the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as interpreted by the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)) 
applies different standards to classify mineralization as a reserve. 

We advise our investors that while the terms “mineral resource,” “measured mineral resource,” “indicated mineral 
resource” and “inferred mineral resource” are recognized and required by Canadian regulations, they are not defined 

2008 Annual Report

29

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL 
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

terms under standards in the United States and normally are not permitted to be used in reports and registration 
statements filed with the SEC. As such, information contained in this report concerning descriptions of mineralization 
and resources required under Canadian standards may not be comparable to similar information made public by US 
companies in SEC filings. Investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of the mineral deposits in these 
categories will ever be converted into reserves.

Mining interests
A significant portion of Eldorado’s mining properties, plant and equipment is depreciated and amortized on a unit-of-
production basis. Under the unit-of-production method, the calculation of depreciation, depletion and amortization 
of mining properties, plant and equipment is based on the amount of reserves expected to be recovered from each 
location. If these estimates of reserves prove to be inaccurate, or if we revise our mining plan for a location due to 
reductions in the metal price forecasts or otherwise, to reduce the amount of reserves expected to be recovered, we 
could be required to write down the recorded value of our mining properties, plant and equipment, or to increase the 
amount of future depreciation, depletion and amortization expense, both of which would reduce our earnings and net 
assets.

In addition, generally accepted accounting principles require us to consider at the end of each period whether 
there has been an impairment of our capitalized mining properties, plant and equipment. For producing properties, 
this assessment is based on expected future net cash flows to be generated from the location. For non-producing 
properties, this assessment is based on whether factors that may indicate the need for a write-down are present. If the 
Company determines there has been an impairment because its prior estimates of future net cash flows have proven 
to be inaccurate, due to reductions in the metal price forecasts, increases in the costs of production, reductions in the 
amount of reserves expected to be recovered or otherwise, or because the Company has determined that the deferred 
costs of non-producing properties may not be recovered based on current economics or permitting considerations, 
the Company would be required to write down the recorded value of its mining properties, plan and equipment, which 
would reduce the Company’s earnings and net assets. A review of Eldorado’s mining properties, plant and equipment 
at December 31, 2008 indicated that their estimated undiscounted net cash flows are significantly in excess of their 
carrying values. In our review, we used an average projected gold price of $895 per ounce for the period 2009 to 2013 
and $750 per ounce from 2014 onwards.

Goodwill and impairment testing
The Company’s business combinations are accounted for using the purchase method of accounting whereby assets 
acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at their fair market values as of the date of acquisition and any excess 
of the purchase price over such fair value is recorded as goodwill.

The Company evaluates on an annual basis the carrying amount of goodwill to determine whether current events and 
circumstances indicate that such carrying amount may no longer be recoverable. To accomplish this, the Company 
compares the fair value of its reporting units to their carrying amounts. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds 
its fair value, the Company compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill to its carrying amount, 
and any excess of the carrying value over the fair value is charged to operations. Assumptions underlying the fair 
value estimates are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Goodwill totalling $2.2 million related to TJS was 
reflected on the consolidated balance sheet at year-end 2008. A review of TJS’s fair value indicated that there was no 
impairment of goodwill at December 31, 2008. We used a discount rate of 9% to calculate the net present value of 
cash flows from TJS in order to estimate its implied fair value.

Operating costs
We report our operating costs in accordance with the Gold Institute Standard. Future operating costs include estimates 
of foreign currency exchange and inflation trends.

30 Eldorado Gold

Stock-based compensation
We use the Black-Scholes Model to determine the fair value for awards of stock options to employees, officers and 
directors. Key assumptions used in this model are share price, volatility and expected life of options.

Asset retirement obligation
When assessing the carrying value of the asset retirement obligation, we estimate, among other things, the mine 
closure date, the credit-adjusted risk-free rate, the inflation rate and the timing of reclamation costs.

Income taxes
Income taxes are recorded using income tax rates expected to apply in the years in which the temporary differences 
are estimated to be recovered or settled. In circumstances where the applicable tax laws and regulations are either 
unclear or subject to varying interpretations, it is reasonably possible that changes in these estimates could occur that 
would materially affect the amount of income tax liabilities recorded at the balance sheet date. 

Financial instruments
Investments classified as held for trading and derivative financial instruments are reported at fair value with unrealized 
gains or losses included in earnings. Fair values are determined directly by reference to published price quotations in 
an active market when available, or by using a valuation technique that uses inputs observed from the market. 

Pension plans
To measure the obligations and expenses of pension plans, we are required to set various actuarial assumptions 
including a long-term estimate of the expected rate of return on plan assets, the discount rate, the rate of salary 
escalation and the average remaining service period of active employees expected to receive benefits. The following 
table outlines the key assumption of our pension plans:

Expected long term rate of return on plan assets
Discount rate beginning of year
Discount rate end of year
Rate of salary escalation
Average remaining service period of active employees 
expected to receive benefits

December 31, 2008

Pension Plan
6.50%
5.25%
7.50%
4.50%
5 years

SERP
6.50%
5.25%
7.50%
4.50%
5 years

13. 

Future Canadian Accounting Pronouncements 

The CICA has issued three new standards and an EIC abstract that may affect Eldorado’s financial disclosures and 
results of operations for interim and annual periods beginning January 1, 2009, 2010 and 2011. We will adopt the 
requirements beginning in the interim period ended March 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011 and we are considering the 
impact this will have on our financial statements.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Section 3064)
In February 2008, the CICA issued Section 3064, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets”, which replaces Section 3062, 
“Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. This new standard provides guidance on the recognition, measurement, 
presentation and disclosure of goodwill and intangible assets and is effective beginning January 1, 2009. Concurrent 
with the adoption of this standard, EIC-27, “Revenues and Expenditures in the Pre-operating Period”, will be withdrawn. 

2008 Annual Report

31

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL 
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This will result in a change to our accounting for the start-up of mining operations, as pre-commercial production costs 
will no longer be capitalized as an asset. The adoption of this new accounting policy will not have any material impact 
on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Business Combinations (Section 1582)
In January 2009, the CICA issued Handbook Section 1582, “Business Combinations” (“CICA 1582”). CICA 1582 
requires that all assets and liabilities of an acquired business be recorded at fair value at acquisition. Obligations for 
contingent considerations and contingencies will also be recorded at fair value at the acquisition date. The standard 
also states that acquisition-related costs will be expensed as incurred and that restructuring charges will be expensed 
in the periods after the acquisition date. The Section applies prospectively to business combinations for which the 
acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period on or after January 1, 2011. 

Consolidations (Section 1601) and Non-Controlling Interest (Section 1602)
In January 2009, the CICA issued Handbook Section 1601, “Consolidations” (“CICA 1601”), and Section 1602, 
“Non-Controlling Interests” (“CICA 1602”). CICA 1601 establishes standards for preparing consolidated financial 
statements and CICA 1602 establishes standards for accounting for a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary in 
consolidated financial statements subsequent to a business combination. These standards apply to interim and 
annual consolidated financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. The Company 
is currently assessing the impact of the new standard on its consolidated financial statements.

Credit Risk and the Fair Value of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (EIC Abstract 173)
In January 2009, the CICA issued EIC Abstract 173, “Credit Risk and the Fair Value of Financial Assets and Financial 
Liabilities”. The EIC requires the Company to take into account the Company’s own credit risk and the credit risk of the 
counterparty in determining the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities, including derivative instruments. 
This abstract applies to interim and annual consolidated financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on 
or after January 1, 2010. We are currently assessing the impact of the new standard on our consolidated financial 
statements.

International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”)
We have established a changeover plan to adopt IFRS by 2011 and have created an implementation team. The 
implementation team has started the process of assessing accounting policy choices and elections that are allowed 
under IFRS. We are also assessing the impact of the conversion on our business activities, including the effect on 
information technology and data systems, internal controls over financial reporting and disclosure controls. We will 
continually review and adjust our changeover plan to ensure our implementation process properly addresses the key 
elements of the plan.

14. 

Other Risks and Uncertainties

Exploration and development
The costs and results of our exploration and development programs affect our profitability and value. Since mines 
have finite lives based on proven reserves, we actively seek to replace and expand our reserves, primarily through 
recognizance exploration and acquiring, exploring and developing our existing operations. Exploration for minerals 
involves many risks and may not result in any new economically viable mining operations or yield new reserves to 
replace and expand current reserves. Determination of reserves is a process of estimation and, as such, reserve 
calculations are subject to the assumptions and limitations of the estimation process.

Acquiring title to mineral properties is a detailed and time-consuming process. We take steps, in accordance with 
industry standards, to verify and secure legal title to mineral properties in which we have or are seeking an interest. 

32 Eldorado Gold

Although we take every precaution to ensure that legal title to our properties is properly recorded in the name of 
Eldorado, there can be no assurance that such title will ultimately be secured on every property. The legal title to our 
properties depends on the appropriate and consistent application of the laws in the countries in which we operate.

Operations 
The business of gold mining involves many operational risks and hazards. We work to reduce the risks associated with 
our projects through high operational standards, an emphasis on hiring and training appropriately skilled personnel 
and operational improvements. We also maintain adequate insurance to cover normal business risk. 

We also rely on a number of key employees. Our success depends on attracting and retaining qualified personnel in a 
competitive labour environment.

Environment
Our activities are subject to extensive federal, provincial, state and local laws and regulations governing environmental 
protection and employee health and safety. We must obtain governmental permits and provide associated financial 
assurance to carry on certain activities. We are also subject to various reclamation-related conditions imposed under 
federal, state or provincial air, water quality and mine reclamation rules and permits.

While we have budgeted for future capital and operating expenditures to maintain compliance with environmental laws 
and permits, any future changes to these laws could adversely affect Eldorado’s financial condition, liquidity or results 
of operations.

Laws and regulations
Eldorado’s mining operations and exploration activities are subject to extensive federal, provincial, state and local 
laws and regulations governing prospecting, development, production, exports, taxes, labour standards, occupational 
health and safety, mine safety and other matters. These laws and regulations are subject to change, which may restrict 
our ability to operate. We draw on the expertise and commitment of our management team, advisors, employees and 
contractors to ensure compliance with current laws, and we foster a climate of open communication and co-operation 
with regulatory bodies.

Litigation
All industries, including the mining industry, are subject to legal claims, with and without merit. In addition to the 
litigation in Turkey as described under Item 6 – Legal of this MD&A and under the heading “Development Projects 
– Turkey Projects” in the Company’s Annual Information Form and the litigation risks discussed therein, we are also 
involved in various legal proceedings. Defence and settlement costs can be substantial, even with respect to claims 
that have no merit. Due to the inherent uncertainty of the litigation process, there can be no assurance that the 
resolution of any particular legal proceeding will not have a material adverse effect on our future cash flow, results of 
operations or financial condition. 

Political risk
Eldorado conducts operations in a number of countries outside of North America, namely Turkey, China, Brazil and 
Greece. These operations are potentially subject to a number of political, economic and other risks that may affect our 
future operations and financial position.

15. 

Non-GAAP Measures

Throughout this document, we have provided measures prepared according to Canadian generally accepted 
accounting principles (GAAP), as well as some non-GAAP performance measures. Because the non-GAAP performance 

2008 Annual Report

33

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL 
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

measures do not have any standardized meaning prescribed by GAAP, they may not be comparable to similar measures 
presented by other companies. We provide these non-GAAP measures as they are used by some investors to evaluate 
Eldorado’s performance. Accordingly, they are intended to provide additional information and should not be considered 
in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP. We have 
defined the non-GAAP measures below and reconciled them to reported GAAP measures.

Unit costs
A reconciliation of cash operating costs calculated in accordance with the Gold Institute Standard to the cost of sales is 
included below: 

Cash operating cost

($000s, except cash operating cost per ounce)

Gold ounces sold
Operating costs
Royalty expense and production taxes
Effects of inventory adjustments
Fair value of stock option grants
Expense of contractual severance costs
Expense of certain development costs
Cash operating cost

Cash operating cost per ounce

2008
316,918
$92,004
(10,117)
625
(1,526)
-
-
$  80,986

$   257

2007
266,012
$72,691
(7,343)
(979)
(1,504)
-
(113)
$  62,752

$   236

2006
127,552
$45,850
(824)
(771)
(359)
(1,377)
(1,129)
$  41,390

$   324

Cash operating costs are calculated in accordance with the Gold Institute Standard. Cash costs are derived from 
amounts included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

16. 

Other MD&A Requirements 

Additional information relating to the Company, including the Company’s Annual Information Form, is available on 
SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

17. 

   Disclosure of Outstanding Share Data

The following table describes the share capital structure as at March 18, 2009, the date of this MD&A. These figures 
may be subject to minor accounting adjustments prior to presentations in future consolidated financial statements.

Equity Type

Common shares

Share purchase options

18. 

Control and Procedures

Weighted average exercise 
price per share
Cdn$

Total number of common 
shares

5.93

370,329,056

11,650,887

Disclosure controls and procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that material information is 
gathered and reported to senior management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as 
appropriate to permit timely decisions regarding public disclosure.

34 Eldorado Gold

 
Management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of 
the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in the rules of the U.S. 
Securities and Exchange Commission and Canadian Securities Administration, as at December 31, 2008. Based on 
this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure 
controls and procedures were effective to a reasonable assurance standard to ensure that information required to 
be disclosed in reports filed or submitted by the Company under United States and Canadian securities legislation is 
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in those rules.

Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting
The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial 
reporting. Any system of internal control over financial reporting, no matter how well designed, has inherent limitations. 
Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to 
financial statement preparation and presentation.

Management has used the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) framework 
to evaluate the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Based on this assessment, 
management has concluded that as at December 31, 2008, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting 
was effective.

On July 7, 2008, we completed our acquisition of Frontier Pacific Mining Corporation (“Frontier”). We consider the 
acquisition of Frontier non-material to our results of operations, financial position and cash flows from the date of 
acquisition through December 31, 2008, and believe that the internal controls and procedures at Frontier have a 
non- material effect on our internal control over financial reporting. We are in the process of integrating the Frontier 
operations and will be expanding our internal control over financial reporting compliance program to include Frontier 
over the next year. We excluded Frontier from our annual assessment of internal control over financial reporting for 
the year ended December 31, 2008 as permitted by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and applicable rules relating to business 
acquisitions. The Frontier operations represent $220 million of total assets and $nil of consolidated revenues as at 
and for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting has been audited by 
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, who have expressed their opinion in 
their report included with the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements.

Changes in internal control over financial reporting
There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the year ended 
December 31, 2008 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over 
financial reporting.

19. 

Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking Information

Certain statements and information in this MD&A, including all statements that are not historical facts, contain 
forward-looking statements and forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable US and Canadian 
securities laws. Such forward-looking statements or information include, but are not limited to, statements or 
information with respect to financial disclosure, the future price of gold, estimation of mineral reserves and exploration 
and development capital requirements, and our goals and strategies. Often, these statements include words such 
as “plans”, “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, 
“anticipates” or “does not anticipate” or “believes” or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain 
actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved. 

2008 Annual Report

35

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL 
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

With respect to forward-looking statements and the information included in this MD&A, we have made numerous 
assumptions, including, among other things, assumptions about the price of gold, anticipated costs and expenditures 
and our ability to achieve our goals, even though our management believes that the assumptions made and the 
expectations represented by such statements or information will prove to be accurate. By their nature, forward-looking 
statements and information are based on assumptions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other 
factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements, or industry results, to be materially different 
from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking information. Such 
risks, uncertainties and other factors include among other things the following: gold price volatility; discrepancies 
between actual and estimated production and mineral reserves and resources; the speculative nature of gold 
exploration; mining operational and development risk; and regulatory risks.

See our Annual Information Form for additional information on risks, uncertainties and other factors relating to the 
forward-looking statements and information. Although we have attempted to identify factors that would cause actual 
actions, events or results to differ materially from those disclosed in the forward-looking statements or information, 
there may be other factors that cause actual results, performances, achievements or events not to be anticipated, 
estimated or intended. Also, many of the factors are beyond our control. Accordingly, readers should not place undue 
reliance on forward-looking statements or information. We undertake no obligation to reissue or update forward-
looking statements or information as a result of new information or events after the date of this MD&A except as 
may be required by law. All forward-looking statements and information made in this document are qualified by this 
cautionary statement.

Eldorado’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP and are filed with 
appropriate regulatory authorities in Canada and the United States.

36 Eldorado Gold

MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL REPORTING

The management of Eldorado Gold Corporation is responsible for the integrity and fair presentation of the financial 
information contained in this annual report. Where appropriate, the financial information, including financial 
statements, reflects amounts based on management’s best estimates and judgments. The financial statements 
have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Canada. Financial information 
presented elsewhere in the annual report is consistent with that disclosed in the financial statements.

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. 
Management has established and maintains a system of internal accounting control designed to provide reasonable 
assurance that assets are safeguarded from loss or unauthorized use, financial information is reliable and accurate 
and transactions are properly recorded and executed in accordance with management’s authorization. This system 
includes established policies and procedures, the selection and training of qualified personnel and an organization 
providing for appropriate delegation of authority and segregation of responsibilities. Any system of internal control 
over financial reporting, no matter how well designed, has inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems 
determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and 
presentation. 

Management has a process in place to evaluate internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria 
established by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control 
– Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment, management has concluded that as at December 31, 2008, the 
Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.

The Board of Directors oversees management’s responsibility for financial reporting and internal control systems 
through an Audit Committee, which is composed entirely of independent directors. The Audit Committee meets 
periodically with management, the Company’s outside advisors and the independent auditors to review the scope and 
results of the annual audit and to review the financial statements and related financial reporting and internal control 
matters before the financial statements are approved by the Board of Directors and submitted to the Company’s 
shareholders.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm appointed by the shareholders, has 
audited the Company’s financial statements in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and 
the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and has expressed its opinion in the 
auditors’ report. The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as at December 31, 2008 
has also been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, and their opinion is included in their report.

Paul N. Wright 
President and Chief Executive Officer   

Earl W. Price
Chief Financial Officer

March 18, 2009
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 

2008 Annual Report

37

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT

To the Shareholders of Eldorado Gold Corporation

We have completed integrated audits of the consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the 
related consolidated statements of operations and deficit, comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the years 
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008 of Eldorado Gold Corporation (the “Company”) and of its internal 
control over financial reporting as at December 31, 2008. Our opinions, based on our audits, are presented below. 

Consolidated financial statements 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of the Company as at December 31, 2008 and 2007, 
and the related consolidated statements of operations and deficit, comprehensive income and cash flows for each 
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008.  These financial statements are the responsibility of 
the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our 
audits.

We conducted our audits of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with Canadian generally 
accepted auditing standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). 
Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the 
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit of financial statements includes examining, on a test 
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. A financial statement audit also 
includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the 
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the 
financial position of the Company as at December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the results of its operations and its cash 
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008 in accordance with Canadian generally 
accepted accounting principles.

Internal control over financial reporting 

We have also audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as at December 31, 2008, based on 
criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations 
of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal 
control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting 
included in the Management’s Report on Internal Control over financial reporting included in the Management’s 
Discussion & Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on 
the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. 

We conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public 
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to 
obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all 
material respects. An audit of internal control over financial reporting includes obtaining an understanding of internal 
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design 
and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as 
we consider necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. 

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding 
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance 
with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those 
policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and 
fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that 

38 Eldorado Gold

transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally 
accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance 
with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding 
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have 
a material effect on the financial statements. 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become 
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may 
deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as at 
December 31, 2008 based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the COSO.

Chartered Accountants
Vancouver, BC
March 18, 2009

2008 Annual Report

39

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)

December 31,
2008
$

December 31,
2007
$

Assets

Current assets

Cash and cash equivalents

Restricted cash (note 6)

Marketable securities (note 7)

Accounts receivable and other (note 8)

Inventories (note 9)

Derivative contract (note 10)

Future income taxes (note 16)

Restricted assets and other (note 11) 

Mining interests (note 12)

Liabilities
Current liabilities

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Debt – current (note 13)
Future income taxes (note 16)

Debt – long-term (note 13)
Contractual severance obligations
Asset retirement obligations (note 14)
Future income taxes (note 16)

Non-controlling interest

Shareholders’ Equity
Share capital (note 17(a))
Contributed surplus (note 17(b))
Accumulated other comprehensive income (note 17(c))
Deficit

Commitments (note 20)

Approved on behalf of the Board of Directors

 61,851 

 – 

 43,610 

 36,109 

 86,966 

 – 

 175 

 228,711 

 8,349 

 668,309 

 905,369 

 42,659 
 139 
 1,097 
 43,895 
 – 
 – 
 4,812 
 60,043 
 108,750 

 4,799 

 931,933 
 19,378 
 (5,971)
 (153,520)
 791,820 

 905,369 

 46,014 

 65,710 

 1,615 

 28,720 

 57,525 

 2,956 

 959 

 203,499 

 10,538 

 377,705 

 591,742 

 40,452 
 65,422 
 – 
 105,874 
 139 
 1,479 
 8,290 
 26,781 
 142,563 

 – 

 753,058 
 13,083 
 214 
 (317,176)
 449,179 

 591,742 

Robert Gilmore 
Director   

Paul N. Wright
Director                                                                                                    

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

40 Eldorado Gold

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND DEFICIT

For the years ended December 31 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share amounts)

2008
$

2007
$

Revenue
Gold sales
Interest and other income

Expenses
Operating costs
Depletion, depreciation and amortization
General and administrative
Exploration
Mine standby costs
Asset retirement obligation costs (note 14)
Foreign exchange loss (gain)

Gain on disposal of assets
Gain on marketable securities
Interest and financing costs
Loss (gain) on derivative contract (note 10)
Writedown of assets

Income before income taxes and non-controlling interest

Income tax (expense) recovery (note 16)
Current
Future

Non-controlling interest

Net income for the year

Deficit, beginning of year:
As previously reported
Change in accounting policy
As adjusted
Deficit, end of year

Weighted average number of shares outstanding 
Basic
Diluted

Earnings per share
Basic income (loss) per share – US$
Diluted income (loss) per share – US$

2006
$

 77,641 
 7,048 
 84,689 

 45,850 
 1,763 
 19,030 
 12,719 
 – 
 661 
 (2,050)
 77,973 

 (41)
 (904)
 1,586 
 – 
 2,186 
 80,800 
 3,889 

 (2,080)
 1,491 
 (589)

 277,723 
 10,508 
 288,231 

 92,004 
 25,995 
 38,299 
 12,316 
 2,432 
 3,108 
 176 
 174,330 

 (70,774)
 (2,475)
 2,940 
 2,956 
 – 
 106,977 
 181,254 

 (25,403)
 12,904 
 (12,499)

 (5,099)

 179,302 
 9,397 
 188,699 

 72,691 
 20,041 
 26,798 
 11,634 
 6,575 
 604 
 (4,658)
 133,685 

 (3,602)
 (221)
 3,415 
 (2,083)
 – 
 131,194 
 57,505 

 (4,823)
 (17,261)
 (22,084)

 – 

 – 

 163,656 

 35,421 

 3,300 

 (317,176)
 – 
 (317,176)
 (153,520)

 (353,470)
 873 
 (352,597)
 (317,176)

 (356,770)
 – 
 (356,770)
 (353,470)

 355,132 
 356,308 

 343,194 
 344,621 

 337,376 
 339,177 

 0.46 
 0.46 

 0.10 
 0.10 

 0.01 
 0.01 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

2008 Annual Report

41

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the years ended December 31 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

Cash flows generated from (used in):

Operating activities
Net earnings for the year
Items not affecting cash

Asset retirement obligations costs
Contractual severance expense
Depletion, depreciation and amortization
Unrealized foreign exchange (gain) loss
Future income taxes (recovery) expense
Gain on marketable securities
Gain on disposal of assets
Imputed interest and financing costs
Stock-based compensation
Fair value of bonus cash award units
Pension expense
Non-controlling interest
Loss (gain) on derivative contract

Property reclamation payments
Contractual severance payments
Changes in non-cash working capital (note 19)

Investing activities
Mining interests

Acquisition of Frontier net of cash received (note 4)
Capital expenditures
Sales and disposals
Marketable securities

Purchases
Disposals

Pension plan contributions (note 15)
Value added taxes recoverable on mining interests
Restricted cash

Financing activities
Capital stock

Share issuance costs
Issuance of common shares for cash
Dividend paid to non-controlling interest
Long-term and bank debt

Proceeds
Repayments

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents – beginning of year
Cash and cash equivalents – end of year
Supplementary cash flow information (note 19)

2008
$

2007
$

2006
$

 163,656 

 35,421 

 3,300 

 3,108 
 – 
 25,995 
 (3,950)
 (12,904)
 (2,475)
 (70,774)
 39 
 11,866 
 1,815 
 1,478 
 5,099 
 2,956 
 125,909 
 (1,225)
 (953)
 (18,187)
 105,544 

 7,479 
 (123,950)
 5,214 

 (20,462)
 25,737 
 (3,791)
 – 
 71,515 
 (38,258)

 – 
 14,730 
 (300)

 5,000 
 (70,879)
 (51,449)
 15,837 
 46,014 
 61,851 

 604 
 721 
 20,041 
 796 
 17,261 
 (221)
 (3,602)
 67 
 7,267 
 – 
 – 
 – 
 (2,083)
 76,272 
 (5,496)
 (2,458)
 1,487 
 69,805 

 – 
 (97,886)
 1,482 

 (1,556)
 663 
 – 
 – 
 5,540 
 (91,757)

 – 
 9,500 
 – 

 24,859 
 (26,360)
 7,999 
 (13,953)
 59,967 
 46,014 

 661 
 1,377 
 1,763 
 – 
 (1,491)
 (904)
 (41)
 91 
 3,542 
 – 
 – 
 – 
 – 
 8,298 
 – 
 (598)
 (30,208)
 (22,508)

 – 
 (95,170)
 1,845 

 – 
 – 
 – 
 (7,579)
 (29,550)
 (130,454)

 (7,089)
 171,225 
 – 

 15,367 
 (400)
 179,103 
 26,141 
 33,826 
 59,967 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

42 Eldorado Gold

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

For the year ended December 31 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

2008
$

2007
$

Net earnings for the period ended December 31, 

163,656

35,421

Other comprehensive income (loss)
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale investments (note 17(c))
Realized gains on available-for-sale investments (note 17(c))
Reversal on acquisition of Frontier (note 4)
Other than temporary impairment charges

(6,431)
(61)
(153)
460

209
(270)
-
-

Comprehensive income for the period ended December 31, 

157,471

35,360

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

2008 Annual Report

43

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008 and 2007 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

NOTE

01

02

44 Eldorado Gold

Nature of operations
Eldorado Gold Corporation (“Eldorado” or “the Company”) is a gold exploration, development, 
mining and production company. The Company has ongoing exploration and development projects 
in Brazil, China, Turkey and Greece. On July 1, 2006, the Company began production in Turkey, and 
on February 1, 2007, the Company began production in China. Production at the Kişladağ mine in 
Turkey was suspended in August 2007 as a result of a court injunction and the mine remained shut 
down throughout the rest of that year. The court injunction was removed in February 2008 and the 
mine restarted production on March 6, 2008. Production operations in Brazil ceased in the second 
quarter of 2007 and the São Bento mine (“São Bento”) was sold to AngloGold Ashanti on December 
15, 2008.

Significant accounting policies

a. 

Basis of presentation and principles of consolidation
These consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with Canadian generally 
accepted accounting principles (“Canadian GAAP”) and presented in United States dollars. 
As disclosed in note 24, Canadian GAAP differs in certain material respects from accounting 
principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”). The consolidated financial 
statements include the wholly owned and partially owned subsidiaries of the Company, the 
most significant of which are presented below:

Subsidiary

Location

Ownership 
interest

Status

Operations and 
development projects 
owned

Qinghai Dachaidan Mining 
Ltd (QDML)

Tüprag Metal Madencilik 
Sanayi ve Ticaret Anonim 
Şirketi

Unamgen Mineração e 
Metalurgia S/A

China

90%

Consolidated

TJS Gold Mine

Turkey

100%

Consolidated

Brazil

100%

Consolidated

Kişladağ Gold Mine
Efemcukuru Project

Vila Nova Iron Ore 
Mine (75% owned)

Thracean Gold Mining SA

Greece

100%

Consolidated

Perama Hill Project

All material inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.

b. 

Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with Canadian GAAP requires 
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets 
and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial 
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. 
Significant areas requiring the use of management estimates include assumptions and 
estimates relating to determining defined ore bodies, value beyond proven and probable 
reserves, fair values for purposes of impairment analysis and valuation of derivative contracts, 
reclamation obligations, non-cash stock-based compensation and warrants, pension benefits, 
valuation allowances for future income tax assets and future income tax liabilities. Actual 
results could differ from these estimates.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008 and 2007 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

NOTE

02continued

c. 

d. 

e. 

f. 

g. 

Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and highly liquid investments having maturity dates 
of three months or less from the date of acquisition that are readily convertible to cash.

Inventories
i. 

Product inventory consists of stockpiled ore, ore on leach pads, crushed ore, in-circuit 
material at properties with milling or processing operations and doré awaiting refinement, 
all of which are valued at the lower of average cost and net realizable value. Product 
inventory costs consist of direct production costs including mining, crushing and 
processing; site administration costs; and allocated indirect costs, including depreciation, 
depletion and amortization of mining interests. 

Inventory costs are charged to operations on the basis of ounces of gold sold. The 
Company regularly evaluates and refines estimates used in determining the costs charged 
to operations and costs absorbed into inventory carrying values based upon actual gold 
recoveries and operating plans.

ii. 

Materials and supplies inventory consists of consumables used in operations, such as 
fuel, chemicals, reagents and spare parts, which are valued at the lower of average cost 
and replacement cost and, where appropriate, less a provision for obsolescence.

Investments
On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the new accounting standard related to financial 
instruments. Under the standard, investments classified as available for sale are reported 
at fair value with unrealized gains or losses excluded from earnings and reported as other 
comprehensive income or loss until such gains or losses are realized or an other than 
temporary decline in fair value has been determined to have occurred. Factors that contribute 
to an other than temporary decline include a significant and prolonged decline in fair value 
below its cost, and the existence of factors such as significant adverse changes in the market 
and economic environments in which the Company operates, which indicate the prospects for 
recovery in the fair value of the investment are compromised in the near term.

Investments classified as held-for-trading are reported at fair value with unrealized gains or 
losses included in earnings. Marketable securities and investments in equity securities held 
for the purpose of trading are classified as held-for-trading and those that are not held for the 
purpose of trading are classified as available-for-sale. 

Deposits
Deposits, such as those required by governmental authorities for possible environmental 
liabilities, are classified as held-for-trading.

Financial instruments
Fair value estimates are made at the balance sheet date, based on relevant market 
information and other information about the financial instruments.

Derivative financial instruments are reported at fair value with unrealized gains or losses 
included in earnings. Fair values are determined directly by reference to published price 
quotations in an active market, when available, or by using a valuation technique that uses 
inputs observed from the markets.

2008 Annual Report

45

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008 and 2007 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

NOTE

02continued

h. 

Mining interests
Mining interests include development expenditures and property, plant and equipment 
recorded at cost. Cost includes expenditures incurred on properties under development and 
the estimated fair value of any related asset retirement obligation at the time the obligation is 
originally recorded. Significant payments related to the acquisition of land and mineral rights 
are capitalized as incurred.

Mineral properties, buildings, plant and equipment, and other assets whose estimated useful 
life is the same as the remaining life of the mine are depreciated, depleted and amortized 
over a mine’s estimated life using the units of production method calculated based on proven 
and probable reserves. Capitalized development costs related to a multi-pit operation are 
amortized on a pit-by-pit basis over the pit’s estimated life using the unit of production method 
calculated based on proven and probable reserves related to each pit. Furniture and fixtures, 
vehicles, computers and other assets whose estimated useful lives are less than the remaining 
life of the mine are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the 
assets.

When events or changes in circumstances suggest impairment of long-lived assets, estimated 
undiscounted future net cash flows are calculated using estimated future gold prices, proven 
and probable reserves, value beyond proven and probable reserves, and estimated net 
proceeds from the disposition of assets on retirement less operating and sustaining capital 
and reclamation costs. If projected undiscounted future cash flows are less than the carrying 
value, the estimated fair value is calculated using discounted future net cash flows and the 
asset is written down to fair value with an impairment charge to operations. Management 
assesses the asset for impairment by comparing its fair value, determined using their best 
estimates of fair value based on the information available.

i. 

Exploration and development
Exploration costs are charged against operations as incurred until a mineral resource having 
economic potential is identified on a property, from which time a property is considered to be 
a development project and such expenditures are capitalized as development costs. Costs 
incurred after the property is placed into production that increase production volume or extend 
the life of the mine are capitalized.

A mineral resource is considered to have economic potential when it is expected that proven 
and probable reserves can be economically developed considering long-term metal prices. 
Therefore, prior to capitalizing such costs, management determines that the following 
conditions have been met:

i. 

There is a probable future benefit that will contribute to future cash inflows;

ii. 

The Company can obtain the benefit and control access to it, and;

iii. 

The transaction or event giving rise to the benefit has already occurred.

j. 

Foreign currency translation
Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar 
are translated into United States dollars using rates of exchange in effect at the balance sheet 
date. Revenue and expense items denominated in foreign currencies are translated at average 
rates. Non-monetary items are translated at historical rates. Any gains and losses are reflected 
in earnings.

46 Eldorado Gold

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008 and 2007 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

NOTE

02continued

k. 

l. 

Capital lease obligations
Leases that transfer substantially all of the benefits and risks of ownership to the Company 
are accounted for as capital leases. Assets recorded under capital leases are amortized on 
a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Obligations recorded under capital leases are 
reduced by lease payments net of imputed interest.

Asset retirement obligations
Asset retirement obligations (“AROs”) represent the estimated discounted net present value 
of statutory, contractual or other legal obligations relating to site reclamation and restoration 
costs that the Company will incur on the retirement of assets and abandonment of mine and 
exploration sites. AROs are added to the carrying value of property, plant, equipment and 
mining interests as such expenditures are incurred and amortized against income over the 
useful life of the related asset. AROs are determined in compliance with recognized standards 
for site closure and mine reclamation established by government regulation.

Over the life of the asset, imputed interest on the ARO liability is charged to operations as 
“accretion of asset retirement obligations” using the discount rate used to establish the ARO. 
The offset of accretion expense is added to the balance of the ARO. 

Where information becomes available that indicates a recorded ARO is not sufficient to meet, 
or exceeds, anticipated obligations, the obligation is adjusted accordingly and added to, or 
deducted from, the ARO. In the event that the adjustment occurs after the mine in question 
has closed, the adjustment is added to or deducted from earnings.

m. 

Stock-based compensation
Stock-based compensation is measured at the estimated fair value of the consideration 
received or the estimated fair value of the equity instruments issued or liabilities incurred, 
whichever estimate is more reliable. Compensation expense is recognized on the graded 
method over the stock option vesting period. The fair values attributable to unvested stock 
options that are forfeited are credited to earnings. 

Bonus cash award units are measured at the amount by which the quoted market value of the 
shares covered by the grant exceeds the option price.

n. 

Income taxes
Future income taxes are recognized for the future income tax consequences attributable to 
differences between the carrying values of assets and liabilities and their respective income 
tax bases. Future income tax assets and liabilities are measured using income tax rates 
expected to apply in the years in which temporary differences are expected to be recovered 
or settled. The effect on future tax assets and liabilities of a change in rates is included in 
operations. A future income tax asset is recorded when the probability of the realization is 
more likely than not.

o. 

Revenue recognition
Revenue from the sale of bullion is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement 
exists, the bullion has been shipped, title has passed to the purchaser, the price is fixed or 
determinable, and collection is reasonably assured. 

2008 Annual Report

47

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008 and 2007 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

NOTE

02continued

p. 

Earnings (loss) per share
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income or loss by the weighted average 
number of outstanding common shares for the year.

The computation of diluted earnings per share reflects the dilutive effect of the exercise of 
stock options and warrants outstanding as at year-end using the treasury stock method. 

q. 

r. 

s. 

t. 

Capitalization of interest
Where the Company has secured debt financing to finance the cost of specific projects, 
interest is capitalized on the related construction and development project until the project 
begins commercial operation or the development ceases.

Stripping costs
Stripping costs incurred during the production phase of a mine are considered production 
costs and are included in the cost of inventory produced during the period in which stripping 
costs are incurred. Pre-stripping costs incurred to prepare the ore body for extraction are 
capitalized as mine development costs. Production is deemed to have commenced when 
saleable minerals are extracted from an ore body.

Mine standby and restructuring costs
Mine standby costs and costs related to restructuring a mining operation are charged directly 
to expense in the period incurred. Examples of mine standby costs are labour, maintenance 
and mine support costs during temporary shutdowns of a mine. Examples of restructuring 
costs are severance payments to employees laid off as a result of outsourcing the mining 
function.

Defined benefit pension plan
Defined benefit pension plan obligations are based on actuarial determinations. The projected 
benefit method prorated on services is used to determine the accrued benefit obligation. 
Actuarial assumptions used to determine defined benefit pension plan liabilities are based 
upon our best estimates of expected plan performance, salary escalation rates and retirement 
dates of employees. The expected return on plan assets is estimated based on the fair value of 
plan assets, asset allocation and expected long-term returns on these components.

Past service costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected average remaining 
service period of active members at the time of the past service event.

Differences between the actuarial liabilities and the amounts recorded in the financial 
statements will arise from changes in plan assumptions, changes in benefits or through 
experience as results differ from actuarial assumptions. Cumulative differences that are 
greater than 10% of either the fair value of the plan assets or the accrued benefit obligation, 
whichever is greater, are amortized over the expected average remaining service period of 
active members.

Certain comparative figures have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation.

48 Eldorado Gold

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008 and 2007 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

NOTE

03

Changes in accounting policies and new accounting developments

Capital Disclosures (Section 1535)
Effective January 1, 2008, Eldorado adopted Section 1535, “Capital Disclosures”, which requires 
disclosure of qualitative and quantitative information that enables readers to evaluate the 
Company’s objectives, policies and processes for managing capital as well as the implications of 
non-compliance. Disclosures required by this standard are included in note 21.

Inventories (Section 3031)
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted Section 3031, “Inventories”. This Section 
prescribes the accounting treatment for inventories and provides guidance on the determination 
of inventory cost and its subsequent recognition as an expense, including any writedown to net 
realizable value. It also provides guidance on the cost formulas used to assign costs to inventories. 
The adoption of this new accounting policy did not have any impact on the Company’s consolidated 
financial statements. 

Financial Instruments – Disclosures (Section 3862) and Presentation (Section 3863)
Effective January 1, 2008, Eldorado adopted Section 3862, “Financial Instruments – Disclosures” 
and Section 3863 “Financial Instruments – Presentation”. These sections require entities to 
disclose quantitative and qualitative information in their financial statements that enables readers 
to evaluate (a) the significance of financial instruments for the entity’s financial position and 
performance; and (b) the nature and extent of risks arising from financial instruments to which the 
entity is exposed during the period and at the balance sheet date, and management’s objectives, 
policies and procedures for managing such risks. Disclosures required by these standards are 
included in note 22.

Income statement presentation of tax loss carryforward recognized following an 
unrealized gain recorded in other comprehensive income (EIC Abstract 172)
In August 2008, the CICA issued EIC-172, “Income statement presentation of tax loss carryforward 
recognized following an unrealized gain recorded in other comprehensive income”. This new 
abstract provides guidance on whether the tax benefit from recognizing tax loss carryforwards 
consequent to the recording of unrealized gains in other comprehensive income, such as 
unrealized gains on available-for-sale financial assets, should be recognized in net income or in 
other comprehensive income. This abstract should be applied retrospectively, with restatement of 
prior periods from the date of adoption of Section 3855, “Financial Instruments”, for all interim 
and annual reporting periods ending on or after December 31, 2008. The adoption of this new 
accounting policy did not have any impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. 

Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Section 3064)
In February 2008, the CICA issued Section 3064, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets”, which replaces 
Section 3062, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. This new standard provides guidance on 
recognizing, measuring, presenting and disclosing goodwill and intangible assets and is effective 
beginning January 1, 2009 and applies prospectively.

Concurrent with the adoption of this standard, EIC-27, “Revenues and Expenditures in the Pre-
operating Period”, will be withdrawn. This will result in a change to the Company’s accounting for 
the start-up of mining operations, as pre-commercial production costs will no longer be capitalized 
as an asset. The adoption of this new accounting policy will not have any material impact on 
Eldorado’s consolidated financial statements.

2008 Annual Report

49

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008 and 2007 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

NOTE

03continued

Business Combinations (Section 1582)
In January 2009, the CICA issued Handbook Section 1582, “Business Combinations”, which 
requires that all assets and liabilities of an acquired business be recorded at fair value at 
acquisition. Obligations for contingent considerations and contingencies will also be recorded 
at fair value at the acquisition date. The standard also states that acquisition-related costs will 
be expensed as incurred and that restructuring charges will be expensed in the periods after 
the acquisition date. The Section applies prospectively to business combinations for which the 
acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period on or after January 
1, 2011. 

Consolidations (Section 1601) and Non-Controlling Interest (Section 1602)
In January 2009, the CICA issued Handbook Section 1601, “Consolidations” (“CICA 1601”), and 
Section 1602, “Non-Controlling Interests” (“CICA 1602”). CICA 1601 establishes standards for 
preparing consolidated financial statements and CICA 1602 establishes standards for accounting 
for a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary in consolidated financial statements subsequent 
to a business combination. These standards apply to interim and annual consolidated financial 
statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. The Company is currently 
assessing the impact of the new standard on its consolidated financial statements.

Credit Risk and the Fair Value of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (EIC 
Abstract 173)
In January 2009, the CICA issued EIC Abstract 173, “Credit Risk and the Fair Value of Financial 
Assets and Financial Liabilities”. The EIC requires the Company to take into account the Company’s 
own credit risk and the credit risk of the counterparty in determining the fair value of financial 
assets and financial liabilities, including derivative instruments. This abstract applies to interim 
and annual consolidated financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after January 
1, 2010. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the new standard on its consolidated 
financial statements.

50 Eldorado Gold

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008 and 2007 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

NOTE

04

Acquisition of Frontier Pacific Mining Corporation
Eldorado completed the acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding common shares of 
Frontier Pacific Mining Corporation (“Frontier”) on July 7, 2008. As a result, Eldorado acquired a 
100% interest in the Perama Hill gold project in Greece and other exploration projects in Peru and 
Colombia.

Under the terms of the offer, each Frontier common share was exchanged for 0.122 common 
shares of Eldorado, C$0.0001 in cash and one Exchange Receipt. Each Exchange Receipt entitles 
the holder to receive an additional 0.008 Eldorado common shares if, prior to July 1, 2009, a 
Joint Ministerial Resolution is issued in Greece by the Joint Ministerial Council (comprised of the 
ministries of the Environment, Agriculture, Development and Health), accepting the Environmental 
Terms of Reference drafted by the Ministry of Environment regarding the Perama Hill project. 

The Company issued 20,339,334 common shares and paid $16 in cash in connection with this 
transaction. No value was assigned to the Exchange Receipts as the Company considers it highly 
unlikely that the condition for their exchange into Eldorado shares will be met. Eldorado incurred 
acquisition costs of $3,935.

As at the date of the transaction, Eldorado held 4,871,300 common shares of Frontier with a 
total cost of $3,412, net of the reversal of the unrealized gain of $153 included in comprehensive 
income.

This transaction has been accounted for as an asset acquisition because Frontier was in the 
development stage. These consolidated financial statements include 100% of Frontier results from 
July 7, 2008 to December 31, 2008.

The allocation of the purchase price of the shares of Frontier is as follows:

Purchase price:
       Share consideration 
       Cash consideration
       Cost of shares previously acquired 
       Transaction costs
       Total purchase price

Fair value of net assets acquired:
       Cash 
       Accounts receivables and other
       Other assets
       Mining interests
       Liabilities
       Due to Eldorado
       Future income taxes payable

$

158,574
16
3,412
3,935
165,937

11,947
1,135
154
207,091
(2,434)
(517)
(51,439)
165,937

As at July 6, 2008, Frontier had borrowed $517 from the Company to fund ongoing administration 
costs. Amounts owing are eliminated on consolidation from July 7, 2008 forward.

Eldorado received net cash proceeds from the Frontier transaction of $7,479, made up of an 
acquired cash balance of $11,947 less cash consideration of $16, transaction costs of $3,935 and 
intercompany debt outstanding of $517.

2008 Annual Report

51

       
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008 and 2007 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

NOTE

05  continued

Sale of São Bento Gold Ltd. and São Bento Mineração S.A.
Effective December 15, 2008, Eldorado sold its wholly owned Bermudian subsidiary, São Bento 
Gold Ltd. and its wholly owned Brazilian subsidiary São Bento Mineração S.A. to AngloGold 
Ashanti. The Company received $70,000 payable by the issuance of 2,701,660 common shares of 
AngloGold Ashanti. Costs of disposition totalled $426. There were no taxes payable as a result of 
the transaction. The gain on sale is calculated as follows:

Assets
Current assets
       Cash 
       Accounts receivable
       Inventories 
       Tax receivable

Mining interest
Total Assets

Liabilities
Current liabilities
       Account payable
       Contractual severance obligations
       Current portion of asset retirement obligations

Asset retirement obligations 
Future income taxes
Total Liabilities

Consideration received – shares 
Costs of disposition 

Gain on disposition of subsidiary

$

104
341
733
1,653
2,831

6,611
9,442

4,453
526
1,603
6,582

4,489
1,252
12,323

(2,881)

70,000
(426)

72,455

06 Restricted cash

Restricted cash represents short-term interest-bearing money market securities and funds held on 
deposit as collateral. As at December 31, 2008, the Company had repaid all the amounts drawn 
previously on its revolving credit facilities for Turkey and China.

Collateral account against the HSBC bank loan – Turkey (note 13(a))
Collateral account against the HSBC bank loan – China (note 13(b))
Electricity deposit

December 31,
2008
$

December 31,
2007
$

–
–
–
–

55,000
10,500
210
65,710

52 Eldorado Gold

       
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008 and 2007 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

NOTE

07 Marketable securities

Marketable securities – Available for sale
Marketable securities – Held for trading
Warrants – Held for trading

08 Accounts receivable and other

Value added and other taxes recoverable
Other receivables and advances
Prepaid expenses and deposits

Inventories

09

Ore stockpiles
In-process inventory including doré
Materials and supplies

December 31,
2008
$
12,084
31,514
12
43,610

December 31,
2007
$
1,615
–
–
1,615

December 31,
2008
$
8,454
20,535
7,120
36,109

December 31,
2007
$
19,829
3,986
4,905
28,720

December 31,
2008
$
24,199
43,825
18,942
86,966

December 31,
2007
$
8,484
33,573
15,468
57,525

10

Derivative contract
In December 2004, São Bento Mineração SA entered into an energy supply contract with 
Companhia Energetica de Minas Gerais (“CEMIG”). With the closure of São Bento in 2007, the 
energy contracted for 2007 and 2008 exceeded the estimated consumption for that period and, 
accordingly, this contract was accounted for as a derivative financial instrument, which is measured 
at fair value with unrealized gains or losses reported in earnings. 

In accordance with the transitional provision of the financial instrument standard, the asset fair 
value of this contract of $873 as at January 1, 2007 has been recorded with a credit directly to 
deficit. 

2008 Annual Report

53

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008 and 2007 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

NOTE

10continued

The fair value as at December 31, 2007 was calculated based on a capital asset pricing model 
(“CAPM”) to estimate the forward price of Brazilian electricity for 2008, adjusted by the Brazilian 
real and US dollar forward exchange rates and then discounted for time value.

CAPM estimates the risk-adjustment applied to spot electricity prices as a means to deriving a 
forward price.

Assumptions used to calculate the fair value of this contract as at December 31, 2007 are as 
follows:

Quantity of energy to purchase
Set price per contract 
Spot price in Brazilian reals 
Forward price of energy (range) 
US treasury yield (range)

78,880.20 MWh
$24.50/MWh
R$502.45/MWh
$111.78/MWh – $54.75/MWh
2.90% – 3.31%

This resulted in a fair value of the asset of $2,956 and the recognition of an unrealized gain for the 
year ended December 31, 2007 of $2,083.

As a result of the sale of the mine on December 15, 2008, the balance of the derivative contract at 
December 31, 2008 was nil.

11 Restricted assets and other

Environmental guarantee deposit
Restricted long-term asset – SERP (note 15)
Accrued pension benefit asset
Goodwill

December 31,
2008
$
2,495
3,505
111
2,238
8,349

December 31,
2007
$
8,300
–
–
2,238
10,538

The environmental guarantee deposit is held on account with a Turkish bank pursuant to 
environmental and pollution guarantees required by the Turkish Ministry of the Environment. The 
funds earn interest at prevailing bank rates, and the interest earned on these deposits is included 
in interest and other income.

54 Eldorado Gold

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008 and 2007 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

NOTE

12 Mining interests

Producing properties
Properties under development

Other mineral interests

Producing properties
Properties under development

Other mineral interests

December 31, 2008
Accumulated
depreciation,
depletion and
amortization

$
60,086
494
60,580
–
60,580

December 31, 2007

Accumulated
depreciation,
depletion and
amortization

$
32,961
–
32,961

–

32,961

Net book
 value

$
355,634
300,665
656,299
12,010
668,309

Net book
 value

$
334,030
43,675
377,705

–

377,705

Cost

$
415,720
301,159
716,879
12,010
728,889

Cost

$
366,991
43,675
410,666

–

410,666

Debt

13

Current:
HSBC term revolving credit facility
HSBC revolving credit facility due November 30, 2008
Sino Gold Limited loan

Long-term:
Sino Gold loan due December 31, 2009

December 31,
2008
$

December 31,
2007
$

–
–
139
139

–
–

55,000
10,062
360
65,422

139
139

a. 

HSBC term revolving credit facility
HSBC has authorized advances of up to $65,000 to Tüprag Metal Madencilik Sanayi Ve Ticaret 
Limited Surketi (“Tüprag”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, under the terms of a 
term revolving credit facility due February 28, 2010 (the “Credit Facility”). As at December 31, 
2008, the Company has repaid all the amounts drawn previously on the facility. The Credit 

2008 Annual Report

55

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008 and 2007 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

NOTE

13continued

Facility can be drawn down in minimum tranches of $1,000 plus multiples of $250. Each 
drawdown bears interest fixed at the prevailing LIBOR plus 0.50% on the date the tranche is 
drawn down.

Under the terms of the Credit Facility, Eldorado is required to fully collateralize any HSBC 
advances to Tüprag with funds of an equal amount deposited on account with HSBC (note 6).

b. 

HSBC revolving credit facility
In November 2007, Qinghai Dachaidan Mining Limited (“QDML”), our 90% owned subsidiary, 
entered into a $15,000 revolving facility (“the Facility) with HSBC Bank (China). As at 
December 31, 2008, the Company has repaid all amounts previously drawn on the Facility. The 
Facility can be drawn down in minimum tranches of $100 or in integral multiples of $10. Each 
drawdown bears interest fixed at the prevailing lending rate stipulated by the People’s Bank 
of China with a 10% markdown. The Facility has a term of one year and is subject to annual 
review and renewal. In November 2008, the Facility was renewed for a second year and the 
interest rate is fixed at 1.2 times the prevailing lending rate stipulated by the People’s Bank of 
China.

The facility is collateralized by way of irrevocable letter of credit drawn on HSBC Bank USA, 
National Association (“HSBC”). Eldorado should maintain at all times a security coverage ratio 
of 110% of the amounts drawn down. The letter of credit has an expiry date of December 1, 
2009 and is collateralized by Eldorado’s funds held by HSBC as restricted cash.

Subsequent to year-end, QDML drew down $5,000 under the Facility.

c. 

Sino Gold loan
The consideration paid for the Tanjianshan property in 2003 included a non-interest-bearing 
loan from Sino Gold Limited (the “Loan”). Imputed interest has been calculated using a 
discount rate of 8%.

The Loan is repayable in equal annual instalments of $400 on December 31 of each year until 
2008, with a final instalment of $150 due on December 31, 2009. Payment of the third annual 
instalment was made in December 2008, resulting in an outstanding balance at December 31, 
2008 of $139 excluding imputed interest.

Fair value of loan outstanding
Less: imputed interest

December 31,
2008
$
150
11
 139

December 31,
2007
$
550
51
 499

56 Eldorado Gold

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008 and 2007 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

NOTE

14

Asset retirement obligations

Balance at beginning of year
Accretion during the year
Revisions to estimate of final obligation
Payments
Disposal (see note 5)

Balance at end of year

Estimated undiscounted amount

Balance at beginning of year
Accretion during the year
Revisions to estimate
ARO liability paid

Balance at end of year
Less: current portion

Long-term portion

Estimated undiscounted amount

Brazil
$
4,463
377
3,229
(1,225)
(6,091)

753

1,350

Brazil
$
9,595
364
–
(5,496)

4,463
509

3,954

5,149

December 31, 2008
Turkey
China
$
$
3,118
1,218
187
68
(532)
–
–
–
–
–

1,286

1,775

2,773

6,823

December 31, 2007
Turkey
China
$
$
2,941
1,155
177
63
–
–
–
–

3,118
–

3,118

1,218
–

1,218

1,775

Total
$
8,799
632
2,697
(1,225)
(6,091)

4,812

9,948

Total
$
13,691
604
–
(5,496)

8,799
509

8,290

5,919

12,843

The ARO estimates attributable to our mines have been determined with reference to independent 
studies obtained by the Company (Brazil – 2006, Turkey and China – 2007) that assumed a closure 
in 2014 in Brazil, 2017 in China and 2024 in Turkey. 

The net present values contemplate credit-adjusted risk-free interest rates of between 5% and 7%.

Revision to estimate of final obligation in Brazil includes $2,476 related to São Bento and $753 
related to the Vila Nova project (“Vila Nova”). ARO costs included in the Statement of Operations 
and Deficit include the São Bento revision of $2,476 and accretion during the year of $632.

2008 Annual Report

57

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008 and 2007 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

NOTE

15 Defined benefit plans

During the year ended December 31, 2008, the company implemented a defined benefit pension 
program with two components: a registered pension plan (“the Pension Plan”) and a non-registered 
supplementary pension plan (“the SERP”). These plans, which are only available to certain 
qualifying employees, provide benefits based on an employee’s years of service and final average 
earnings at retirement. There are no indexation features. Annual contributions to these plans 
are actuarially determined and made at or in excess of minimum requirements prescribed by 
legislation.

The Company’s plans are actuarially evaluated for funding purposes on a three-year cycle. Both of 
the plans were last actuarially evaluated on January 1, 2008 for funding purposes and the next 
required valuation will be as of January 1, 2011. The measurement date used to determine all of 
the accrued benefit obligation and plan assets for accounting information was December 31, 2008.

The SERP is designed to provide supplementary pension benefits to qualifying employees affected 
by the maximum pension limits under the Income Tax Act and the Company is not required to pre-
fund any benefit obligation under the SERP.

Total cash payments
Total cash payments for pension benefits for 2008, including cash contributed to the Pension Plan 
and the SERP were $3,791. No cash payments were made directly to beneficiaries during the year. 
The Company expects to contribute $88 to the Pension Plan and $1,313 to the SERP in 2009 
based on minimum funding requirements.

The estimated future pension payments for the next five years and five years thereafter are as 
follows:

2009
$

2010
$

2011
$

2012
$

2013
$

2014 and 
later
$

Estimated future pension payments

–

–

61

450

450

2,429

58 Eldorado Gold

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008 and 2007 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

NOTE

15continued

The details of the Company’s benefit plans as at December 31, 2008 are as follows:

December 31, 2008

Pension Plan
$

Accrued benefit obligation
Balance at beginning of year
Current service cost
Past service costs (net of qualifying transfer)
Qualifying transfer
Interest cost
Benefits paid
Actuarial gains
Balance at end of year

Plan assets
Fair value at beginning of year
Actual return on plan assets
Employer's contribution (1)
Qualifying transfer
Benefit paid
Fair value at end of year

Funded status
Fair value of plan assets
Accrued benefit obligation
Plan surplus (deficit)
Unamortized actuarial gains
Unamortized past service cost
Net accrued benefit asset (liability)

 –   
 104 
 326 
 561 
 49 
 –   
 (287)
 753 

 –   
 17 
 270 
 561 
 –   
 848 

 848 
 753 
 95 
 (243)
 259 
 111 

SERP
$

 –   
 378 
 3,570 
 –   
 197 
 –   
 (108)
 4,037 

 –   
 –   
 –   
 –   
 –   
 –   

 –   
 4,037 
 (4,037)
 (108)
 2,828 
 (1,317)

(1) The Company has deposited $3,505 in an investment account to fund its SERP obligation. This 
amount is included in restricted assets and other (note 11) 

The accrued benefit asset (liability) is included in the Company’s balance sheet as follows:

Restricted assets and other (note 11)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Total

December 31, 2008

Pension Plan
$
 111 
 –   
 111 

SERP
$
 –   
 (1,317)
 (1,317)

2008 Annual Report

59

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008 and 2007 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

NOTE

15continued

The net expense recognized for the Company’s defined benefit plans is as follows:

Current service cost
Interest cost
Expected gains on plan assets
Amortization of past service costs
Net pension expense

December 31, 2008

Pension Plan
$
 104 
 49 
 (45)
 66 
 174 

SERP
$
 378 
 194 
 –   
 732 
 1,304 

TOTAL
$
 482 
 243 
 (45)
 798 
 1,478 

Plan assets
The assets of the Pension Plan and the amounts deposited in the SERP account are managed by a 
major investment management company and are invested only in conformity with the investment 
requirements of applicable pension laws.

The following table summarizes the defined benefit plans’ weighted average asset allocation 
percentages by asset category at December 31, 2008:

Cash and equivalents
Fixed income
Equity
Total

Pension Plan

6%
94%
0%
100%

SERP
5%
52%
43%
100%

Combined

5%
55%
40%
100%

Significant assumptions
The significant assumptions used are as follows:

Expected long term rate of return on plan assets
Discount rate beginning of year
Discount rate end of year
Rate of salary escalation
Average remaining service period of active 
employees expected to receive benefits

December 31, 2008

Pension Plan
6.50%
5.25%
7.50%
4.50%
5 years

SERP

6.50%
5.25%
7.50%
4.50%
5 years

The assumptions for the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets for the purposes of the 
actuarial valuation are based on the asset mix of the portfolio, historical data from similar plans 
and the review of projected returns by asset class.

60 Eldorado Gold

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008 and 2007 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

NOTE

16 Income taxes

The significant components within the Company’s future tax liability are as follows:

Future income tax assets

Mining interest
Loss carry forwards
Other
Liabilities 

Valuation allowance

Future income tax liabilities

Mining interest
Unrealized gains on foreign exchange translation and other

Net future income tax liabilities

This is represented on the balance sheet as:

Current future income tax assets
Current future income tax liabilities
Long-term future income tax liabilities

December 31,
2008
$

December 31,
2007
$

3,824
30,655
2,367
1,897
38,743
(35,946)
2,797

61,149
2,613
63,762
60,965

17,109
113,807
8,630
5,000
144,546
(137,919)
6,627

16,921
15,528
32,449
25,822

December 31,
2008
$
(175)
1,097
60,043
60,965

December 31,
2007
$
(959)
–
26,781
25,822

Income tax expense differs from the amount that would result from applying the statutory Canadian 
federal and provincial tax rates to income before income taxes. These differences result from the 
following items:

Net income before taxes
Statutory tax rate

2008
$
181,254
31.00%

2007
$
57,505
34.12%

2006
$
3,889
34.12%

Tax expense at the statutory income tax rate

56,189

19,620

1,327

Tax effect of:

Losses not recognized
Difference in foreign tax rates
Foreign exchange
Sale of São Bento 
Change in Greek tax rate
Future income tax assets not previously recognized
Non-deductible expense and other items

Income tax expense

4,249
(17,792)
(3,364)
(22,462)
(10,287)
–
5,966
 12,499

6,265
(2,105)
(2,738)

–
–
1,042
 22,084

1,070
(1,895)
4,239

–
(7,010)
2,858
 589

2008 Annual Report

61

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008 and 2007 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

NOTE

16continued

The two major factors causing the effective tax rate to decline from 38.41% in 2007 to 6.90% in 
2008 are the tax-free gain from the sale of São Bento and the reduction of the future income tax 
recorded on the Frontier acquisition due to a reduction in the Greek future income tax rates from 
25% to 20%.

At December 31, 2008, the Company had available losses for income tax purposes of approximately 
$51,943 in Canada and Greece expiring in various years from 2009 to 2028.

In addition, the Company’s Brazilian subsidiaries have losses of $24,000 (December 31, 2007 
– $268,000) that can be used to offset taxable income, and $24,000 (December 31, 2007 – 
$243,000) that can be used to offset income for social contribution tax. These losses have no 
expiry date and can be used to offset 30% of taxable income in any one year. The Brazilian losses 
declined this year due to the sale of São Bento, which at December 31, 2007 had $239,426 
of losses to offset taxable income and $214,498 that could be used to offset income for social 
contribution tax (note 5).

17 Shareholders’ equity

a. 

Authorized share capital
The Company’s authorized share capital consists of an unlimited number of voting common 
shares without par value and an unlimited number of non-voting common shares without par 
value. At December 31, 2008 there were no non-voting common shares outstanding.

Voting common shares

Number of 
shares

Amount
$

Balance, January 1, 2006

302,577,378

573,721

Financing, February 2006, net of issue costs
Shares issued upon exercise of share options, for cash
Shares issued upon exercise of Afcan warrants, for cash
Warrants reallocated to share capital upon exercise
Estimated fair value of share options exercised

34,500,000
1,476,075
2,594,778
–
–

154,406
4,234
5,496
902
1,302

Balance, December 31, 2006

341,148,231

740,061

Shares issued upon exercise of share options, for cash
Estimated fair value of share options exercised

3,060,309
–

9,500
3,497

Balance, December 31, 2007

344,208,540

753,058

Shares issued upon exercise of share options, for cash
Estimated fair value of share options exercised
Shares issued for acquisition of Frontier

3,730,155
–
20,339,334

14,730
5,571
158,574

Balance, December 31, 2008

368,278,029

931,933

62 Eldorado Gold

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008 and 2007 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

NOTE

17continued

b. 

Contributed surplus
The continuity of contributed surplus on the Consolidated Balance Sheet is as follows:

Contributed surplus attributable to:

Balance, January 1, 2006

Stock-based 
compensation

$
5,979

Other

$
1,996

Credited to share capital on Afcan warrants 
exercised after acquisition
Non-cash stock-based compensation
Options exercised, credited to share capital

–

(902)

3,542
(1,302)

–
–

Total

$
7,975

(902)

3,542
(1,302)

Balance, December 31, 2006

8,219

1,094

9,313

Non-cash stock-based compensation
Options exercised, credited to share capital

7,267
(3,497)

–
–

7,267
(3,497)

Balance, December 31, 2007

11,989

1,094

13,083

Non-cash stock-based compensation
Options exercised, credited to share capital

11,866
(5,571)

–
–

11,866
(5,571)

Balance, December 31, 2008

18,284

1,094

19,378

c. 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
Accumulated other comprehensive income includes the following:

Balance, beginning of period
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale 
investment-net of taxes
Other than temporary impairment charges
Realized gains on sale of available-for-sale investment 
transferred to net income
Reversal on acquisition of Frontier (note 4)

Balance, end of period

2008
$
214

(6,431)

460

(61)

(153)

(5,971)

2007
$
275

209

–

(270)

–

214

2008 Annual Report

63

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008 and 2007 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

NOTE

18 Stock-based compensation

a. 

Share option plans
The Company has two share option plans (“Plans”) approved by the shareholders under which 
share purchase options (“Options”) can be granted to directors, officers, employees and 
consultants.

The Company’s Employee Plan, as amended from time to time, was established in 1994. 
Subject to a 10-year maximum, Employee Plan Options generally have a five-year term. 
Employee Plan Options vest at the discretion of the Board of Directors at the time an Option is 
granted, typically in three separate tranches over two years. As at December 31, 2008, a total 
of 662,701 Options (December 31, 2007 – 1,618,511) were available to grant to employees, 
consultants or advisors under the Employee Plan.

The Company’s Directors and Officers Plan (“D&O Plan”) was established in 2003 and 
amended in 2005. Subject to a 10-year maximum, D&O Plan Options generally have a five-year 
term. D&O Options vest at the discretion of the Board of Directors at the time an Option is 
granted, typically in three separate tranches over two years. As at December 31, 2008, a total 
of 1,138,041 Options (December 31, 2007 – 2,999,850) were available to grant to directors 
and officers under the D&O Plan.

The continuity of share purchase options outstanding is as follows:

Weighted 
average 
exercise price
Cdn$

3.82
6.67
3.10
5.25

5.36
5.50
3.95
6.55

5.71

Number of 
options

7,276,463  
4,108,125
(3,060,309)
(100,000)

8,224,279  
8,960,000
(3,730,155)
(15,210)

13,438,914

Contractual 
weighted 
average 
remaining life
(years)

2.8

3.1

3.9

Balance, December 31, 2006

Granted
Exercised
Cancelled

Balance, December 31, 2007

Granted
Exercised
Cancelled

Balance, December 31, 2008

At December 31, 2008, 6,119,729 share purchase options (December 31, 2007 – 5,064,193) 
with a weighted average exercise price of Cdn$5.69 (December 31, 2007 – Cdn$4.64) had 
vested and were exercisable.

64 Eldorado Gold

 
 
 
 
 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008 and 2007 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

NOTE

18continued

Options outstanding at December 31, 2008 are as follows:

December 31, 2008

Total options outstanding

Exercisable options

Shares

Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
life
(years)

Weighted
average
exercise
price
Cdn$

Shares

826,100
5,389,338
1,307,138
2,823,000  
3,093,338
13,438,914

0.8
4.8
2.8
4.1
3.4
3.9

3.48
4.88
5.42
6.43
7.20
5.71

826,100
1,538,670
1,047,957
899,331
1,807,671
6,119,729

Weighted
average
exercise
price
Cdn$

3.48
4.88
5.48
6.42
7.16
5.69

Range of
exercise price
Cdn$

$3.00 to $3.99
$4.00 to $4.99
$5.00 to $5.99
$6.00 to $6.99
$7.00 to $7.99

b. 

Stock-based compensation expense
The exercise prices of all Options granted during the period were at or above the market 
price at the grant date. Stock-based compensation expense is calculated using a Black-
Scholes option pricing model to determine the estimated fair values of all Options granted. 
The value determined on the date an Option is granted is recorded over the vesting period of 
each respective option. This expense has been included in the undernoted expenses in the 
Consolidated Statements of Operations as follows:

Operating costs
Exploration
Administrative

Total 

2008
$
1,526
1,401
8,939

11,866

2007
$
1,504
1,009
4,754

7,267

2006
$
359
170
3,013

3,542

The assumptions used to estimate the fair value of Options granted during the years ended 
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 were:

2008

2007

2006

Risk-free interest rate (range)
Expected volatility (range)
Expected life (range)
Expected dividends

2.39% – 3.48%
40% – 53%
3.4 years
Nil

3.53% – 4.25%
42% – 53%
4 years
Nil

4.0% – 4.5%
42% – 50%
4-5 years
Nil

c. 

Bonus Cash Award Units plan
In August 2007, the directors adopted a Bonus Cash Award Units (“BCAU”) plan with an 
effective date of August 2, 2007. The plan provides for the Board of Directors (the “Directors”) 
to grant BCAUs to officers, employees and consultants subject to vesting and other conditions 

2008 Annual Report

65

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008 and 2007 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

NOTE

18continued

19

as determined by the Directors; however, the vesting period may not exceed five years from the 
grant date, but may be accelerated at the discretion of the Directors. The settlement of BCAUs 
must be made in cash and is calculated as the excess of trading price of Eldorado shares 
traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) on the trading day on which the designated 
participant elects to exercise their BCAU over the trading price of Eldorado shares traded on 
the TSX on the grant day. 

As of December 31, 2008, 587,500 BCAUs with a vesting date of February 8, 2009 were 
outstanding. The carrying value of the BCAUs at December 31, 2008 was $2,059, and is 
reflected in accrued liabilities on the balance sheet. The Company paid $1,658 in bonus cash 
award units in the year 2008. The related cost in the amount of $3,473 is included in general 
and administrative expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. 

Supplementary cash flow information

Changes in non-cash working capital

Accounts receivable and prepaids
Inventories
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

Supplementary cash flow information

Income taxes paid
Interest paid

Non-cash investing and financing activities

2008
$

2007
$

2006
$

7,504
(26,057)
366
(18,187)

1,976
(16,900)
16,411
1,487

(2,129)
(26,222)
(1,857)
(30,208)

3,952
24,971

2,887
4,078

434
2,566

Shares issued on acquisition of Frontier
Shares received on sale of São Bento

158,574
70,000

–
–

–
–

20

Commitments
The Company’s contractual obligations, not disclosed on the balance sheet, at December 31, 2008, 
include:

Operating leases and property 
expenditures
Purchase obligations
Totals

2009
$

2010
$

2011
$

2012
$

2,336

2,016

1,877

1,860

33,805 11,557 11,498
11,476
36,141 13,573 13,375 13,336

2013 and 
later
$

2,140

–
2,140

Purchase obligations from 2010 forward relate solely to Kişladağ operations, including the 
estimated commitments under the unhedged diesel fuel purchase commitments for 2010 through 
2012.

66 Eldorado Gold

 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008 and 2007 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

NOTE

21 Capital disclosure

Eldorado’s objectives when managing capital are to:

a. 
b. 
c. 

safeguard our ability to continue as a going concern, 
have sufficient capital to develop our mining projects and take them into production, and
meet external capital requirements on our credit facilities.

The Company monitors capital based on the debt to adjusted capital ratio. Debt is defined as 
the total of current and long-term debt shown on the balance sheet. Adjusted capital includes all 
components of shareholders’ equity, which includes accumulated comprehensive income, share 
capital, contributed surplus and deficit.

Eldorado’s strategy is to keep the debt to adjusted capital ratio below 40%. The debt to adjusted 
capital ratio at December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was nil and 14.60% respectively. 

22 Financial instruments

a. 

Fair value
The fair value of financial instruments at December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 is 
summarized as follows:

Financial Assets
Held for trading
  Cash and cash equivalents
  Restricted cash
  Marketable securities
  Accounts receivable and other
  Derivative contract
  Restricted asset and other

Available for sale 
  Marketable securities

December 31, 2008

December 31, 2007

Carrying 
amount
$

Fair value
$

Carrying 
amount
$

Fair value
$

61,851 
 –   
31,526 
27,655 
 –   
6,000 

61,851 
 –   
31,526 
27,655 
 –   
6,000 

46,014 
65,710 
 –   
8,891 
2,956 
8,300 

46,014 
65,710 
 –   
8,891 
2,956 
8,300 

12,084 

12,084 

1,615 

1,615 

Financial Liabilities
  Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
  Debt

41,342 
139 

41,342 
139 

40,452 
65,561 

40,452 
65,561 

Fair values are determined directly by reference to published price quotations in an active 
market, when available, or by using a valuation technique that uses inputs observed from 
relevant markets.

2008 Annual Report

67

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008 and 2007 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

NOTE

22continued

b. 

Financial risk management
Eldorado’s activities expose it to a variety of financial risks, including credit risk, foreign 
exchange risk, interest rate risk, gold price risk and liquidity risk. 

Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk that one party to a financial instrument will fail to discharge an obligation 
and cause the other party to incur a financial loss. Financial instruments that potentially 
subject the Company to credit risk consist of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and 
accounts receivable. Eldorado deposits its cash and cash equivalents, including restricted 
cash, with high credit quality financial institutions as determined by ratings agencies. As at 
December 31, 2008, approximately 55% of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents are held 
with one financial institution.

The Company sells its gold bullion exclusively to large international financial institutions or on 
the Istanbul and Shanghai Gold Exchanges. Payment is normally in advance or within one week 
of receipt of shipment. The historical level of customer defaults is negligible which reduces the 
credit risk associated with trade receivables at December 31, 2008.

Currency risk
The Company operates principally in Canada, Turkey, China, Brazil and Greece, and is therefore 
exposed to foreign exchange risk arising from transactions denominated in foreign currencies. 

Eldorado’s cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued 
liabilities are denominated in several currencies (mainly Canadian dollars, Turkish liras, 
Chinese renminbi and Brazilian real) and are therefore subject to fluctuation against the US 
dollar. 

As a result of the acquisitions of Afcan and Frontier assets in 2005 and 2008 respectively, 
the Company recorded $56,600 of future income tax liabilities on mining interests which are 
recorded in local currencies. The future income tax liabilities are monetary items that are 
revalued each period-end at current exchange rates, with the gain or loss recorded in net 
earnings in the period.

The Company is exposed to currency risk through the following financial assets and liabilities, 
value added tax and other taxes recoverable and future income tax asset and liabilities 
denominated in currencies other than US dollars at December 31, 2008:

68 Eldorado Gold

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008 and 2007 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

NOTE

22continued

Cash and cash 
equivalents

Canadian 
dollar

Australian 
dollar

Euro

Turkish        
lira

Chinese 
renminbi

Brazilian 
real

Peruvian 
sol

 4,618 

 70 

 139 

 1,280 

 48,453 

 3,487 

 415 

Marketable securities

 14,804 

 –   

 –   

 –   

 –   

 –

Accounts receivable 
and other

Future income tax 
receivable

Accounts payable 
and accrued 
liabilities

Future income tax 
liabilities

 1,902 

 78 

 357 

 12,733 

 44,426 

 830 

 –   

 –   

 –   

 –   

 1,197 

 –   

 –

 –   

 –   

 (8,549)

 –   

 (153)

(14,233)

(155,879)

(2,113)

 (165)

 –   

 –   

(26,390)

(15,302)

(88,144)

(2,826)

 –   

Net balance

 12,775 

 148 

(26,047)

(15,522)

(149,947)

 (622)

 250 

Equivalent in US 
dollars

 10,489 

 103 

(36,462)

 (10,140)

 (22,025)

 (277)

 112 

Based on the balances as at December 31, 2008, a 1% increase (decrease) in the exchange 
rates on that date would have resulted in a (decrease) increase of approximately $582 in 
earnings before income. There would be no effect in other comprehensive income.

Our cash flows from our operations are exposed to foreign exchange risk, as commodity sales 
are set in US dollars and a certain amount of our operating expenses are in the currency of the 
country in which our mining operations take place. 

Interest rate risk
Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value of future cash flows of a financial instrument 
will fluctuate due to changes in market interest rates. Current financial assets and financial 
liabilities are generally not exposed to interest rate risk because of their short-term nature. 
Eldorado’s debt is not exposed to interest rate cash flow risk as the interest rate has been 
fixed at the time of each drawdown. The approximate average interest rate earned by the 
Company in 2008 on its cash and cash equivalents was 2.36% (2007 – 5.17%). A 10% 
increase or decrease in the interest earned from financial institutions on deposits and money 
market investments held at December 31, 2008 would result in a $0.1 million increase or 
decrease in the Company’s after-tax net earnings.

Gold price risk and other price risk
Eldorado is subject to price risk for fluctuations in the market price of gold. Gold prices are 
affected by numerous factors beyond our control, including central bank sales, producer 
hedging activities, the relative exchange rate of the US dollar with other major currencies, 
global and regional demand and political and economic conditions. Worldwide gold production 
levels also affect gold prices, and the price of gold is occasionally subject to rapid short-term 
changes due to speculative activities. We have elected not to actively manage our exposure 
to gold price risk at this time. From time to time, we may use commodity price contracts to 
manage our exposure to fluctuations in the price of gold. 

2008 Annual Report

69

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008 and 2007 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

NOTE

22continued

Other price risk is the risk that the value of a financial instrument will fluctuate as a result of 
changes in market prices. Eldorado’s other price risk includes equity price risk, whereby the 
Company’s investments in marketable securities are subject to market price fluctuation.

Liquidity risk 
Liquidity risk is the risk that an entity will encounter difficulty in raising funds to meet 
commitments associated with financial instruments. The Company manages liquidity by 
maintaining adequate cash and cash equivalent balances and by using its lines of credit as 
required. Our treasury department monitors and reviews both actual and forecasted cash 
flows, and also matches the maturity profile of financial assets and liabilities. 

23 Segmented information

During the period ended December 31, 2008, Eldorado had four reporting segments. The Brazil 
reporting segment includes the development activities of Vila Nova and exploration activities in 
Brazil. The Turkey reporting segment includes the operations of the Kişladağ mine, development 
activities of the Efemçukuru project and exploration activities in Turkey. The China reporting 
segment includes the operations of the Tanjianshan mine and exploration activities in China. The 
Greece reporting segment includes development activities on the Perama Hill project. The other 
reporting segment includes the operations of the Company’s corporate office and exploration 
activities in other countries.

Net mining interests

Producing properties
Properties under 
development
Other mineral interests

Turkey
$

China
$

December 31, 2008
Greece
$

Brazil
$

Other
$

Total
$

190,881 163,157

–

106

1,490 355,634

54,378

–

38,986 207,301

– 300,665

4,151

–
249,410 163,157

7,359

–
46,345 207,407

500

12,010
1,990 668,309

Net mining interests

Producing properties
Properties under 
development

December 31, 2007

Turkey
$

China
$

175,888

149,267

38,358

–

Brazil
$

7,919

5,317

Other
$

Total
$

956

334,030

–

43,675

214,246

149,267

13,236

 956

377,705

70 Eldorado Gold

 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008 and 2007 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

NOTE

23continued

Operations

Revenue

Gold sales
Interest and other income

Expenses except the 
undernoted

Depletion, depreciation and 
amortization

Exploration
Loss (gain) on disposal of 
assets

2008

Turkey
$

China
$

Brazil
$

Greece
$

Other
$

Total
$

161,442 116,281
387
162,207 116,668

765

–
7,661
7,661

–
–
–

– 277,723
1,695
10,508
1,695 288,231

63,506

47,652

13,399

(4,543)

19,426 139,440

8,190

17,201

206

5,865

1,897

1,235

–

1,665 (72,455)

–

–

–

398

25,995

3,319

12,316

16 (70,774)

Income (loss) before tax
Income tax recovery (expense)
Non-controlling interest

84,646
(17,866)
–

48,253
(10,311)
(5,099)

65,276
5,473
–

4,543 (21,464) 181,254
(12,499)
(83)
(5,099)
–

10,288
–

Net income (loss)

66,780

32,843

70,749

14,831 (21,547) 163,656

Revenue

Gold sales
Interest and other income

Expenses except the 
undernoted
Depletion, depreciation and 
amortization
Exploration

Turkey
$

94,219
1,869
96,088

China
$

78,176
137
  78,313

2007
Brazil
$

6,907
2,639
9,546

Corporate
$

Total
$

–
4,752
4,752

179,302
9,397
188,699

39,630

45,399

(1,286)

15,776

99,519

4,248

15,502

–

291

20,041

6,500

102

3,588

1,444

11,634

Income (loss) before tax
Income tax recovery (expense)
Net income (loss)

45,710
(9,325)
36,385

17,310
(7,941)
9,369

7,244
(4,786)
2,458

(12,759)
(32)
(12,791)

57,505
(22,084)
35,421

2008 Annual Report

71

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008 and 2007 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

NOTE

23continued

Revenue

Gold sales
Interest and other income

Expenses except the 
undernoted
Depletion, depreciation and 
amortization
Exploration

Income (loss) before tax
Income tax recovery (expense)
Net income (loss)

Turkey
$

39,232
310
39,542

19,248

1,489

4,845

13,960
2,113
16,073

China
$

–
82
  82

465

39

172

(594)
–
(594)

2006
Brazil
$

38,409
1,154
39,563

Corporate
$

Total
$

–
5,502
5,502

77,641
7,048
84,689

36,514

10,091

66,318

–

235

1,763

7,702

(4,653)
(2,636)
(7,289)

–

12,719

(4,824)
(66)
(4,890)

3,889
(589)
3,300

72 Eldorado Gold

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008 and 2007 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

NOTE

24 Differences between Canadian and United States GAAP

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP. 

The material differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP affecting the Company are 
summarized below:

2008
$

2007
$

2006
$

163,656

35,421

3,300

Statement of operations

Net income reported under Canadian GAAP
Add (deduct) items subject to US GAAP
Exploration costs (a)
Capitalized interest expense (g)
Depreciation on capitalized interest (g)
Bonus cash award units (h)
Deferred start-up costs and revenues (b)
Depreciation related to start-up period (b)
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative contracts (c)
Future income taxes (d) 

Net income 
Other comprehensive income (loss) for the year 
under Canadian GAAP
Add (deduct) items subject to US GAAP
Pension plans (i)

(1,361)
1,368
(440)
187
(2,172)
175
–
3,280

164,693

(6,185)

(7,585)
2,009
(198)
(385)
2,172
(1,401)
873
654

31,560

(61)

(2,736)

–

Comprehensive income under US GAAP

155,772

31,499

Basic and diluted earnings per share - US GAAP

0.46

0.09

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) 
     under US GAAP

Beginning of year
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments (f)
Pension plans (i)

End of year

2008
$

2007
$

214
(6,185)
(2,736)

(8,707)

275
(61)
–

214

(4,662)
1,586
–

–
–
–
607

831

228

–

1,059

0.00

2008 Annual Report

73

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008 and 2007 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

NOTE

24continued

Assets

Total assets reported under Canadian GAAP
Exploration costs (a)
Future income taxes (d)
Deferred start-up costs and revenues (b)
Depreciation related to start-up period (b)
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments (f) 
Capitalized interest expense – net (g)

2008
$

2007
$

905,369
(30,132)
4,541
–
(1,226)
–
4,325

591,742
(28,771)
1,261
2,172
(1,401)
–
3,397

Total assets under US GAAP

882,877

568,400

Liabilities
Total liabilities reported under Canadian GAAP
Pension plans (i)
Bonus cash award units (h)

Total liabilities under US GAAP

2008
$

2007
$

108,750
2,736
198

142,563
–
385

111,684

142,948

Non-controlling interest under Canadian and US GAAP

4,799

–

Shareholders’ equity
Shareholders’ equity reported under Canadian 
GAAP
Cumulative adjustments to shareholders’ equity

Exploration costs (a)
Future income taxes (d)
Deferred start-up costs and revenues (b)
Depreciation related to start-up period (b)
Accumulated other comprehensive income - 
pension plans (i)
Bonus cash award units (h)
Unrealized gain on investments (f) 
Interest expense capitalized – net  (g)

791,820

449,179

(30,132)
4,541
–
(1,226)

(2,736)

(198)
–
4,325

(28,771)
1,261
2,172
(1,401)

–

(385)
–
3,397

Shareholders’ equity under US GAAP

766,394

425,452

74 Eldorado Gold

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008 and 2007 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

NOTE

24continued

Cash flows (used in) generated from:

Operating activities under Canadian GAAP

Exploration costs (a)
Deferred start-up costs and revenues (b)
Capitalized interest expense (g)

2008
$

105,544
(1,361)
–
1,368

2007
$

69,805
(7,585)
5,159
2,009

2006
$

(22,508)
(4,662)
–
1,586

Operating activities under US GAAP

105,551

69,388

(25,584)

Investing activities under Canadian GAAP

Exploration costs (a)
Deferred start-up costs and revenues (b)
Capitalized interest expense (g)

(38,258)
1,361
–
(1,368)

(91,757)
7,585
(5,159)
(2,009)

(130,454)
4,662
–
(1,586)

Investing activities under US GAAP

(38,265)

(91,340)

(127,378)

Financing activities under Canadian and US 
GAAP

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash 
equivalents for Canadian and US purposes

(51,449)

7,999

179,103

15,837

(13,953)

26,141

Cash and cash equivalents – beginning of year

46,014

59,967

33,826

Cash and cash equivalents – end of year

61,851

46,014

59,967

A description of US GAAP that results in differences from Canadian GAAP is as follows:

a. 

b. 

c. 

Exploration costs
Exploration costs are accounted for in accordance with Canadian GAAP as disclosed in note 
2(i). For US GAAP purposes, exploration costs relating to unproven mineral properties are 
expensed as incurred until completion of an economic feasibility study, after which exploration 
and development costs are capitalized.

Deferred start-up costs and revenues
US GAAP requires that operating profits and losses from newly commissioned operations be 
recorded at the time the first product is shipped. Canadian GAAP records operating profits 
and losses from the date commercial production commences. Under Canadian GAAP, deferred 
start-up costs and revenues are amortized over the life of the project.

Derivative contracts
Under US GAAP, SFAS 133 requires that all derivatives be recorded on the balance sheet 
as either assets or liabilities at their fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are 
recognized in income unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. Commencing January 
1, 2007, under Canadian GAAP, the Company adopted the new Financial Instrument Standards 
as disclosed in note 2. As a result of this, there are no continuing differences with respect to 
derivatives.

2008 Annual Report

75

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008 and 2007 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

NOTE

24continued

d. 

e. 

Future income taxes
Under US GAAP, the Company would record an increase of $3,280 (2007 – $654) in future 
income tax recovery related to the reconciliation items described under items (a), (b) and (g) of 
this note.

FASB Interpretation No. 48 – Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an     
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (Accounting for Income Taxes) (FIN 48)
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) issued Interpretation No. 48, 
“Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (FIN 48), which supplements SFAS No. 109, 
“Accounting for Income Taxes” (SFAS No. 109), by defining the confidence level that a tax 
position must meet in order to be recognized in the financial statements. FIN 48 requires 
that the tax effect(s) of a position be recognized only if it is “more likely than not” to be 
sustained based solely on its technical merits as of the reporting date. The more likely than 
not threshold represents a positive assertion by management that a company is entitled to 
the economic benefits of a tax position. If a tax position is not considered more likely than 
not to be sustained based solely on its technical merits, no benefits of the tax position are to 
be recognized. The more likely than not threshold must continue to be met in each reporting 
period to support continued recognition of a benefit. 

With the adoption of FIN 48, companies are required to adjust their financial statements to 
reflect only those tax positions that are more likely than not to be sustained. The Company 
adopted FIN 48 as of January 1, 2007. As a result of this adoption, the Company did not 
recognize any further increases or decreases in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits. 
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of the unrecognized tax benefits is as 
follows:

Balance at January 1, 
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
Reductions based on tax positions related to the current year
Additions for tax positions of prior years
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
Balance at December 31, 

2008
$
10,034
–
(294)
–
(2,810)
6,930

2007
$
8,537
1,343
–
154
–
10,034

As at December 31, 2008, the Company has $6,930 unrecognized tax benefits (2007 – 
$10,034). If recognized, none of the unrecognized tax benefit would affect the effective tax 
rate.

The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits 
in income taxes. During the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company 
recognized approximately $nil, $236 and $562 in interest and penalties. The Company had 
approximately $nil and $908 for paying interest and penalties accrued at December 31, 2008 
and 2007 respectively.

The Company is subject to taxes in Canada, Brazil, China and Turkey. The tax years that remain 
subject to examination as of December 31, 2008 for these jurisdictions are:

Canada 
Brazil 
China 
Turkey 

2001 to the present
2004 to the present
2007 to the present
2004 to the present

76 Eldorado Gold

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008 and 2007 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

NOTE

24continued

f. 

Investments
Under US GAAP, marketable securities are classified as “held to maturity”, “held for trading”, 
or “available for sale” in accordance with FASB Statement No. 115, Accounting for Certain 
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities (“FAS 115”). Certain securities held by the Company 
would be classified as “available for sale” under FAS 115 and would be recorded at market 
value, with any unrealized gain or loss recorded in other comprehensive income. 

Under Canadian GAAP prior to January 1, 2007, the Company carried its investments in public 
companies at cost, less provision for other than temporary declines in value. Effective January 
1, 2007, with the adoption of the financial instrument standard, the Company carries these 
investments at fair value with unrealized gains or losses recorded in other comprehensive 
income. As a result there is no longer a difference.

g. 

h. 

i. 

Interest expense
Under Canadian GAAP, where the Company has secured debt financing to finance the cost 
of specific projects, interest is capitalized on the related construction and development 
project until the project begins commercial operation or development ceases, at which time 
the interest is charged to operations. Under US GAAP, interest is capitalized on an interest 
avoidance basis. Under this method, regardless of the application of the loan proceeds, any 
interest incurred is capitalized to the cost of any development or construction project to the 
extent of the lesser of the interest cost incurred or the amount that can be attributed to the 
cost of any capital development or construction costs and any uncapitalized interest is charged 
to operations.

Bonus cash award units
Under Canadian GAAP, bonus cash award units are measured at the amount by which the 
quoted market value of the shares covered by the grant exceeds the option price. Under US 
GAAP, Statement 123 (R) requires that awards classified as liabilities be measured at fair value 
at each reporting date. The fair value is estimated using an option pricing model.

Pension plans
For US GAAP purposes, the Company is required to report the overfunded asset or 
underfunded liability of its defined benefit pension plans on the balance sheet. Changes in 
the funded status are recorded through other comprehensive income. The information set 
out below should be read in conjunction with the information disclosed under Canadian GAAP 
requirements for pension plans provided in note 15.

The funded status at the end of the year and the related amounts recognized on the statement 
of financial position for US GAAP purposes are as follows:

2008 Annual Report

77

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008 and 2007 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

NOTE

24continued

78 Eldorado Gold

Funded status as at December 31, 2008
Fair value of plan assets
Benefit obligations
Funded status

Amounts recognized in the balance sheet
Non current assets
Current liabilities
Non current liabilities
Funded status

Amounts recognized in other comprehensive income
Net actuarial loss (gain)
Past service cost (credit)

Pension Plan
$

848 
753 
95 

95 
– 
– 
95 

(243)
259 
16 

SERP
$

– 
4,037 
 (4,037)

– 
– 
4,037 
(4,037)

(108)
2,828 
2,720 

The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets 
for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets at December 
31, 2008 are as follows: 

Accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets
    Projected benefit obligation at end of year
    Accumulated benefit obligation at end of year
    Fair value of plan assets at end of year

2008
$

4,145 
4,037 
–

The Company has deposited $3,505 in an investment account to fund its SERP obligation. This 
amount is included in restricted asset and other (note 11).

The estimated amounts that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income 
into net periodic benefit cost in 2009 are as follows:

     Net actuarial loss (gain)
     Past service cost (credit)
     Total

Pension Plan
$
(46)
67 
21 

SERP
$
– 
741 
741 

j. 

Adoption of new United States accounting pronouncements

i. 

Fair value measurements

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” 
(SFAS No. 157), which provides a consistent definition of fair value that focuses on 
exit price and prioritizes, within a measurement of fair value, the use of market-based 
inputs over entity-specific inputs. SFAS No. 157 requires expanded disclosures about 
fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for 
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal 

 
 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008 and 2007 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

NOTE

24continued

years. The provisions of SFAS No. 157 were applied prospectively. The Company adopted 
the provisions of SFAS No. 157 on January 1, 2008, which did not have any effect on its 
overall financial condition and results of operations. Fair values as of December 31, 2008 
were calculated as follows:

Balance at 
December 31, 
2008

           $

Quoted Prices 
in Active 
Markets for 
Identical 
Assets
              $

Significant 
Other 
Observable 
Inputs

Significant 
unobservable 
inputs

           $

              $

(Level 1)

(Level 2)

(Level 3)

Financial Assets
Held for trading
  Cash and cash equivalents
  Marketable securities
  Accounts receivable and other
Restricted asset and other

Available for sale 
  Marketable securities

Financial Liabilities
  Debt

61,851 
31,526 
27,655 
6,000 

61,851 
31,526 
16,231 
6,000 

12,084 

12,084 

139 

 –   

 –   
 –   
 –   
 –   

 –   

 –   

 –   
 –   
 11,424 
 –   

 –   

 139 

SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation 
techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to 
unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 
measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). The 
three levels of the fair value hierarchy under SFAS No. 157 are described below:

Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the 
measurement date for identical unrestricted assets or liabilities.

Level 2 – Inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, but do not qualify as 
Level 1 inputs (i.e., quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities).

Level 3 – Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the 
fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported by little or no market activity).

ii. 

Fair value option for financial assets and financial liabilities

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial 
Assets and Financial Liabilities – including an Amendment of SFAS No. 115” 
(SFAS No. 159), which permits an entity to measure certain financial assets and financial 
liabilities at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. Entities 
that elect the fair value option will report unrealized gains and losses in earnings at each 
subsequent reporting date. The fair value option may be elected on an instrument-by-
instrument basis, with few exceptions. The Statement also establishes presentation and 
disclosure requirements to help financial statement users understand the effect of the 

2008 Annual Report

79

 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008 and 2007 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

NOTE

24continued

election. SFAS No. 159 is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year beginning 
after November 15, 2007 and therefore became effective for the Company as of January 
1, 2008. The Company has not elected to measure any eligible items at fair value. 
Accordingly, the adoption of this standard has not impacted the Company’s financial 
condition and results of operations.

k. 

Recent United States accounting pronouncements

i. 

Hierarchy of generally accepted accounting principles

In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally 
Accepted Accounting Principles”. This Statement identifies the sources of accounting 
principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used when preparing 
financial statements of non-governmental entities that are presented in conformity with 
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. This Statement is effective 
60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight 
Board amendments to AU Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity 
With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”. The Company does not expect any 
material impact on its financial position and results of operation with the adoption of this 
statement.

ii. 

Derivatives

In March 2008, the FASB issued Financial Accounting Standards No. 161, “Disclosures 
about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – An Amendment of FASB Statement 
No. 133” (“FAS No. 161”). FAS No. 161 enhances the disclosure requirements under FAS 
No. 133 pertaining to how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, how derivative 
instruments and related hedge items are accounted for under FAS No. 133, and how 
derivative instruments and related hedge items affect an entity’s financial position, 
financial performance and cash flows. FAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal years, and interim 
periods within those fiscal years, beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company is 
currently evaluating the potential impact of adopting this statement on the Company’s 
derivative instrument disclosures. 

iii. 

Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157

In February 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB 
Statement No. 157”. FSP FAS 157-2 delayed the effective date of FAS No. 157 by one 
year (until fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008) for non-financial assets 
and non-financial liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial 
statements on a non-recurring basis. The Company is currently evaluating the potential 
impact of adopting this statement.

iv. 

Business combinations

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations”, which 
retained the underlying concepts of SFAS No. 141 in that all business combinations are 
still required to be accounted for at fair value under the acquisition method of accounting. 
However, SFAS No. 141(R) changed the method of applying the acquisition method in a 
number of significant aspects.

80 Eldorado Gold

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008 and 2007 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

NOTE

24continued

SFAS No. 141(R) will require that: (1) for all business combinations, the acquirer records 
all assets and liabilities of the acquired business, including goodwill, generally at their 
fair values; (2) certain contingent assets and liabilities acquired be recognized at their 
fair values on the acquisition date; (3) contingent consideration be recognized at its fair 
value on the acquisition date and, for certain arrangements, changes in fair value will be 
recognized in earnings until settled; (4) acquisition-related transaction and restructuring 
costs be expensed rather than treated as part of the cost of the acquisition and included 
in the amount recorded for assets acquired; (5) in step acquisitions, previous equity 
interests in an acquiree held prior to obtaining control be re-measured to their acquisition-
date fair values, with any gain or loss recognized in earnings; and (6) when making 
adjustments to finalize initial accounting, companies revise any previously issued post-
acquisition financial information in future financial statements to reflect any adjustments 
as if they had been recorded on the acquisition date. 

SFAS No. 141(R) is effective on a prospective basis for all business combinations for which 
the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual period subsequent to 
December 15, 2008, with the exception of the accounting for valuation allowances on 
deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies. SFAS No. 141(R) amends SFAS No. 109 
such that adjustments made to valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired 
tax contingencies associated with acquisitions that closed prior to the effective date of 
this statement should also apply the provisions of SFAS No. 141(R). This standard will be 
applied to all future business combinations for US GAAP purposes.

v. 

Non-controlling interests in consolidated financial statements

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Non-controlling Interests in 
Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of ARB 51” (SFAS No. 160), which 
amends ARB 51 to establish new standards that will govern the accounting for and 
reporting of non-controlling interests in partially owned consolidated subsidiaries and the 
loss of control of subsidiaries. 

Also, SFAS No. 160 requires that: (1) non-controlling interest, previously referred to as 
minority interest, be reported as part of equity in the consolidated financial statements; 
(2) losses be allocated to the non-controlling interest even when such allocation might 
result in a deficit balance, reducing the losses attributed to the controlling interest; 
(3) changes in ownership interests be treated as equity transactions if control is 
maintained; and, (4) upon a loss of control, any gain or loss on the interest sold be 
recognized in earnings. SFAS No. 160 is effective on a prospective basis for all fiscal 
years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 
2008, except for the presentation and disclosure requirements, which will be applied 
retrospectively. The Company is currently evaluating the effects, if any, that SFAS No. 160 
may have on its financial condition and results of operations. 

2008 Annual Report

81

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Five-Year Summary
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and per ounce amounts)

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Balance Sheet

Net working capital
Mining interests
Other non-current assets and restricted cash
Non-current liabilities
Non-controlling interest

Net assets

 184,816 
 668,309 
 8,349 
 (64,855)
(4,799)

 97,625 
 377,705 
 10,538 
 (36,689)
–

 102,164 
 311,080 
 60,538 
 (77,877)
–

 30,456 
 209,936 
 59,088 
 (74,553)
–

 144,017 
 75,013 
 1,224 
 (13,293)
–

 791,820 

 449,179 

 395,905 

 224,927 

 206,961 

Share capital
Contributed surplus
Accumulated Other comprehensive income (loss)
Deficit
Net equity

 931,933 
 19,378 
(5,971)
(153,520)
 791,820 

 753,058 
 13,083 
214
 (317,176)
 449,179 

 740,061 
 9,314 
–
(353,470)
 395,905 

 573,721 
 7,976 
–
(356,770)
 224,927 

 508,373 
 6,232 
–
(307,644)
 206,961 

Operations

Revenues

Gold revenues
Interest and other

Operating
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
General and administrative
Exploration
Mine stand-by costs
Accretion of asset retirement obligation

Net operating income (loss) before the undernoted

(Gain) loss on disposal of assets
(Gain) loss on marketable securities held for 
trading
Interest and financing expense
Foreign exchange (gains) losses
Unrealized (gain) on derivative contracts
Non-controlling interest
Writedown of assets
Income tax (expense) recovery
Net income (loss)

 277,723 
 10,508 
 288,231 
 92,004 
 25,995 
 38,299 
 12,316 
 2,432 
 3,108 
 114,077 
 (70,774)
 (2,475)

 2,940 
 176 
 (2,956)
 (5,099)
 – 
 (12,499)
 163,656 

 179,302 
 9,397 
 188,699 
 72,691 
 20,041 
 26,798 
 11,634 
 6,575 
 604 
 50,356 
 (3,602)
 (221)

 3,415 
 (4,658)
 2,083 
 – 
 – 
 (22,084)
 35,421 

 77,641 
 7,048 
 84,689 
 45,850 
 1,763 
 19,030 
 12,719 
 – 
 661 
 4,666 
 (41)
 (904)

 1,586 
 (2,050)
 – 
 – 
 2,186 
 (589)
 3,300 

 29,680 
 4,117 
 33,797 
 35,378 
 9,798 
 14,937 
 7,386 
 – 
 484 
 (34,186)
 (227)
 662 

 88 
 547 
 – 
 – 
 13,375 
 (495)
 (49,126)

 33,153 
 2,762 
 35,915 
 33,109 
 4,431 
 8,425 
 4,312 
 – 
 430 
 (14,792)
 7 
 (37)

 25 
 (196)
 – 
 – 
 – 
 649 
 (13,942)

82 Eldorado Gold

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Five-Year Summary
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and per ounce amounts)

Cash flows generated from (used in)

Operating activities

Operations before stock-based compensation
Stock-based compensation

Non-cash working capital changes

Investing activities

Net mining interest investment
Restricted cash
Other

Financing activities

Debt proceeds, net of repayments
Common shares, net of issuance costs

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

 111,865 
 11,866 
 123,731 
 (18,187)
 105,544 

 61,051 
 7,267 
 68,318 
 1,487 
 69,805 

 5,618 
 3,542 
 9,160 
 (31,668)
 (22,508)

 (17,390)
 2,426 
 (14,964)
 4,478 
 (10,486)

 (7,630)
 3,720 
 (3,910)
 (6,955)
 (10,865)

 (109,773)
 71,515 
 – 
 (38,258)

 (97,297)
 5,540 
 – 
 (91,757)

 (100,904)
 (29,550)
 – 
 (130,454)

 (97,940)
 (50,000)
 664 
 (147,276)

 (22,988)
 – 
 70 
 (22,918)

 (66,179)
 14,730 
 (51,449)

 (1,501)
 9,500 
 7,999 

 14,967 
 164,136 
 179,103 

 49,014 
 7,184 
 56,198 

 – 
 63,708 
 63,708 

Net cash generated (used)
Cash – beginning of year
Cash – end of year

 15,837 
 46,014 
 61,851 

 (13,953)
 59,967 
 46,014 

 26,141 
 33,826 
 59,967 

 (101,564)
 135,390 
 33,826 

 29,925 
 105,465 
 135,390 

Mining Operations

Production:
   Gold (oz.)
       Ounces production
       Ounces sold

Average selling price realized
       ($/oz.) – sold
Total cash cost ($/oz.)

 308,802 
 316,919 

 281,135 
 266,012 

 135,653 
 127,552 

 64,298 
 66,804 

 82,024 
 81,913 

 876 
 289 

 674 
 263 

 609 
 330 

 444 
 416 

 409 
 302 

2008 Annual Report

83

CORPORATE INFORMATION

DIRECTORS

Hugh C. Morris (1) (3)
Delta, BC, Canada
Non-executive Chairman of the Board
(Independent Director)

John S. Auston (2) (3)
West Vancouver, BC, Canada
(Independent Director)

K. Ross Cory (1) (3)
Vancouver, BC, Canada
(Independent Director)

Robert R. Gilmore (1) (2)
Denver, CO, USA

Geoffrey Handley (2) (3)
Dover Heights, NSW, Australia
(Independent Director)

Wayne D. Lenton (2)
Tucson, AZ, USA
(Independent Director)

Donald Shumka (1)
Vancouver, BC, Canada
(Independent Director)

Paul N. Wright
Vancouver, BC, Canada
President & Chief Executive Officer
Eldorado Gold Corporation

Committees of the Board of Directors
(1) Audit Committee
(2) Compensation Committee
(3) Corporate Governance and Nominating 
Committee

OFFICERS

Paul N. Wright
President & Chief Executive Officer

Earl W. Price
Chief Financial Officer

Norman S. Pitcher
Chief Operating Officer

Dawn L. Moss
VP, Administration and Corporate Secretary

SENIOR MANAGEMENT

Dale L. Churcher
VP, Engineering

Eduardo E. Moura
VP, Corporate Development

Paul J. Skayman
VP, Operations

Nancy E. Woo
VP, Investor Relations

Brazil Operations

Lincoln Silva
General Manager and Director
Unamgen Mineração e Metalurgia S/A

Sergio Martins
Director, Exploration & Geology
Unamgen Mineração e Metalurgia S/A

Turkey Operations

David A. Bickford
Chairman of the Board of Directors and 
General Manager
Tüprag Metal Madencilik Sanayi ve Ticaret 
Anonim Şirketi

M. Umit Akdur
Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors
Tüprag Metal Madencilik Sanayi ve Ticaret 
Anonim Şirketi

Mehmet Yilmaz
Director
Tüprag Metal Madencilik Sanayi ve Ticaret 
Anonim Şirketi

William R. Crabtree
General Manager
Kişladağ Mine

China Operations

Mark Platts
General Manager
Tanjianshan Gold Mine

Richard Li
General Manager of Eldorado Gold Corp., 
Beijing and Director, Qinghai Dachaidan 
Mining Ltd.

Alex Zhang
Manager, Exploration, China, Beijing

Greece Operations

George Markopoulos 
General Manager and Director
Thracean Gold Mining SA

George Falakis 
Chief Geologist
Perama Project

OFFICES

Canada
Eldorado Gold Corporation
Head Office
1188 Bentall 5
550 Burrard Street
Vancouver, BC, Canada V6C 2B5
Tel: 604-687-4018
Fax: 604-687-4026
Toll Free: 1-888-353-8166

Brazil
Unamgen Mineração e Metalurgia 
S/A
Avenida Olegário Maciel, 1846 - 
Santo Agostinho
Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil,
CEP 30180-112 
Tel: 55-31-3292-1617 

Turkey
Tüprag Metal Madencilik Sanayi ve 
Ticaret Anonim Şirketi
Iran Caddesi
Turan Emeksiz Sok. No. 1
06700 Gaziosmanpasa, Ankara, 
Turkey 
Tel: 90-312-468-4536 
Fax: 90-312-468-2646 

Kişladağ Mine
Kişladağ Altin Madeni
Gumuskol Koyu Ovacik Mevkii
64900 Ulubey, Usak, Turkey

Efemçukuru Project
Cumhuriyet Meydanı
Cumhuriyet Apt. No: 12
1001-1002 Alsancak, Izmir, Turkey

China
Eldorado Gold Corporation
Room 1101 - 11th Floor, Tower B, 
Wanda Plaza
No. 93 Jianguo Road,
Chaoyang District
Beijing, China 100022 
Tel: 86-10-5820-5477 
Fax: 86-10-5820-5476

84 Eldorado Gold

 
CORPORATE INFORMATION

Stock Exchange
The Toronto Stock Exchange
Stock Symbol: ELD

The New York Stock Exchange Amex
Stock Symbol: EGO

Sources of Shareholder Information

This Annual Report is one of several 
sources of information for shareholders of 
Eldorado Gold Corporation.

Other sources include:

The audited comparative financial 
statements published annually.

The comparative interim financial 
statements published quarterly.

The Management Proxy Circular 
describing the matters to be considered 
at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

The Annual Information Form, Form 40F 
and other corporate and continuous 
disclosure documents available on the 
Company’s website, CDS SEDAR website 
(www.sedar.com) and the US Securities 
and Exchange Commission EDGAR 
website (www.edgar-online.com).

Website Address:
www.eldoradogold.com

Investor Relations Email:
info@eldoradogold.com

Qinghai Dachaidan Mining Ltd.
Room 501, Huizhi Business 
Building
No: 16 Wusi West Road
Xining, Qinghai, PRC 81008

Tanjianshan Mine
Dachaidan County
Haixi District
Qinghai Province, PRC

Greece
Thracean Gold Mining SA   
27, Omirou Street   
Athens, Greece, 10672   
Tel: 30-210-3633930   
Fax: 30-210-3633383

Alexandroupolis Office   
51, Venizelou Street
68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece
Tel: 30-25510-81887
       30-25510-80987
Fax: 30-25510-35613

LEGAL COUNSEL

Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP
Vancouver, BC, Canada

Dorsey & Whitney LLP
Denver, CO, USA

AUDITORS

PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP
Chartered Accountants
Vancouver, BC, Canada

SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION

Transfer Agent
Valiant Trust Company
600-750 Cambie Street
Vancouver, BC, Canada V6B 0A2 
Shareholder Inquiries Line (Toll 
Free): 1-866-313-1872 

2008 Annual Report

85

   
  
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements and information in this Annual Report, including all statements that are not historical 
facts, contain forward-looking statements and forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable 
US and Canadian securities laws. Such forward-looking statements or information include, but are not 
limited to, statements or information with respect to financial disclosure, estimates of future production 
the future price of gold, estimation of mineral reserves and resources and estimates of exploration and 
development capital expenditures, permitting and our goals and strategies. Often, these statements 
include words such as “plans”, “expects” or  “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, 
“estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates” or “does not anticipate” or “believes” or variations of 
such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, 
“might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved. 

With respect to forward-looking statements and information included in this report, we have made 
numerous assumptions including among other things, assumptions about the price of gold, anticipated 
costs and expenditures and our ability to achieve our goals.  Even though our management believes 
that the assumptions made and the expectations represented by such statements or information are 
reasonable, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statement or information will prove to 
be accurate. By their nature, forward-looking statements and information are based on assumptions 
and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual 
results, performance or achievements, or industry results, to be materially different from future results, 
performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements or information. 
Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include among other things the following: gold price volatility; 
discrepancies between actual and estimated production and mineral reserves and resources; the 
speculative nature of gold exploration; mining operational and development risk; ability to obtain financing; 
currency fluctuations; environmental risks; global economic climate; ability to complete acquisitions; share 
price volatility; and community and non-governmental actions and regulatory risks.

See our Annual Information Form and our quarterly and annual MD&A for additional information on risks, 
uncertainties and other factors relating to the forward-looking statements and information. Although we 
have attempted to identify factors that would cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially 
from those disclosed in the forward-looking statements or information, there may be other factors that 
cause actual results, performances, achievements or events not to be anticipated, estimated or intended. 
Also, many of the factors are beyond our control. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance 
on forward-looking statements or information. We undertake no obligation to reissue or update forward-
looking statements or information as a result of new information or events after the date of this report 
except as may be required by law. All forward-looking statements and information made in this document 
are qualified by this cautionary statement.

The terms “mineral reserve,” “proven mineral reserve” and “probable mineral reserve” are Canadian 
mining terms as defined in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for 
Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) under the guidelines set out in the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy 
and Petroleum (the “CIM”) CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, adopted by the 
CIM Council as may be amended from time to time by the CIM. 

86 Eldorado Gold

The definitions of proven and probable reserves used in NI 43-101 differ from the definitions in the United 
States Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") Industry Guide 7. Under SEC Industry Guide 7 stan-
dards, a "Final" or "Bankable" feasibility study is required to report reserves, the three-year history average 
price is used in any reserve or cash flow analysis to designate reserves and the primary environmental 
analysis or report must be filed with the appropriate governmental authority.

In addition, the terms "mineral resource", "measured mineral resource", "indicated mineral resource" and 
"inferred mineral resource" are defined in and disclosed in accordance with the requirements of NI 43-101; 
however, these terms are not defined terms under SEC Industry Guide 7 and normally are not permitted to 
be used in reports and registration statements filed with the SEC. Investors are cautioned not to assume 
that any part or all of the mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into reserves. "In-
ferred mineral resources" have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty 
as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral 
resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral 
resources may not form the basis of feasibility or prefeasibility studies, except in rare cases.

Accordingly, information contained in this report and the documents incorporated by reference herein con-
taining descriptions of our mineral deposits may not be comparable to similar information made public by 
US companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements under US federal securities laws and 
the rules and regulations thereunder.

2008 Annual Report

87

E
L
D
O
R
A
D
O
G
O
L
D
C
O
R
P
O
R
A
T
I
O
N

2
0
0
8
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

Corporate Office: 1188 - 550 Burrard Street, Bentall 5, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6C 2B5
Telephone: (604) 687-4018    Fax: (604) 687-4026    Email: info@eldoradogold.com
TSX: ELD      NYSE-A: EGO
www.eldoradogold.com