M
A
R
E
N
I
C
A
E
N
E
R
G
Y
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T
2
0
1
3
2 0 2 0   A N N U A L   R E P O R T
PERTH HEAD OFFICE
Ground Floor, 6 Kings Park Road
West Perth
Western Australia 6005
PO Box 761, West Perth
Western Australia 6872
TEL +61 (0)8 6555 1816
NAMIBIA OPERATIONS OFFICE
35 Daniel Tjongarero Avenue
Commercial Unit 3, Second Floor
Swakopmund, Namibia
PO Box 8485
Swakopmund, Namibia 
TEL +264 (0)64 40 2221
FAX +264 (0)64 40 6363
www.marenicaenergy.com.au
 
 
 
 
Contents 
Corporate Information 
Chairman’s Letter 
Review of Operations 
Directors’ Report 
Auditor’s Independence Declaration 
Remuneration Report - Audited 
Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income 
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position 
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity 
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 
Consolidated Notes to the Financial Statements 
Directors' Declaration 
Audit Report 
Additional ASX Information 
Schedule of Interests in Minerals Tenements 
3 
4 
5 
18 
22 
23 
29 
30 
31 
32 
33 
57 
58 
62 
66 
2 
 
 
 
 
 
Corporate Information 
ABN 71 001 666 600 
DIRECTORS 
A Bantock (Independent Non-executive Chairman) 
M Hill (Managing Director and CEO) 
N Chen (Non-executive Director) 
AUDITOR 
Rothsay Auditing  
Level 1, Lincoln House  
4 Ventnor Avenue  
West Perth WA 6005 
Tel: +61 8 9486 7094 
COMPANY SECRETARY 
S McBride 
REGISTERED OFFICE 
Office C1 
1139 Hay Street 
West Perth WA 6005 
Tel: +61 8 6555 1816 
BUSINESS OFFICE 
Office C1 
1139 Hay Street 
West Perth WA 6005 
Tel: +61 8 6555 1816 
WEB SITE 
www.marenicaenergy.com.au 
STOCK EXCHANGES 
Australian Securities Exchange Limited – MEY 
Namibia Stock Exchange – MEY 
HOME EXCHANGE 
Perth 
SHARE REGISTRY 
Advanced Share Registry Services 
110 Stirling Highway 
Nedlands WA 6009 
Tel: +61 8 9389 8033 
Fax: +61 8 9262 3723 
ASX CODE 
MEY 
3 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4 
Chairman 
Andrew Bantock 
Yours faithfully 
ahead, and again thank shareholders for their continued and much valued support. 
I look forward to your company realising the opportunity that the past year’s efforts have generated over the year 
the past year.  
support of your CFO Shane McBride, my fellow director Nelson Chen and all who have worked with Marenica over 
In closing, I again extend my thanks for the leadership and efforts of your CEO Murray Hill, as well as the ongoing 
re-rating, should the uranium price finally take-off. 
recent exploration success and substantial uranium resources; is well placed to benefit from a significant equity price 
with Namibian and Australian uranium projects.  We therefore believe your Company, with its vast tenement holdings, 
We know that past uranium price increases delivered substantial market capitalisation growth for listed companies 
catalysts to future market re-pricing.  
market  fundamentals,  including  the  reduction  of  intermediate  refined  uranium  product  stockpiles,  as  potential 
reported spot pricing remaining stubbornly low. Frustrating as that is, we recognise the reported firming of underlying 
We continue to see market dynamics as supportive of a significant future increase in the uranium price, despite recent 
of Marenica’s owned or controlled uranium resources. 
processing surficial uranium ores.  We will continue to look to apply U-pgradeTM to accelerate the development 
  Our  patented  U-pgradeTM  beneficiation  technology,  which  we  believe  is  likely  to  transform  the  economics  of 
and 
  A corporate capacity for growth by acquisition, as demonstrated by our Australian uranium portfolio acquisition; 
Hirabeb, confirmed to extend over 36 kilometres; 
mineralised palaeochannel systems; the first at Koppies covering over 6.4 square kilometres and the second at 
  An active and successful Namibian exploration program, that over the past year has discovered two extensive 
ground rights, by area, in Namibia; 
  A  geological  strategy  which  has  seen  your  Company  become  the  largest  holder  of  nuclear  fuels  exploration 
world’s most stable, valued and reliable uranium producing jurisdictions; 
  Over 90 million pounds of U3O8 resources across multiple uranium projects in Namibia and Australia - two of the 
appreciation. Our stand-out investment features now include: 
With  these  achievements  in  hand  we  believe  your  Company  is  well  positioned  for  future  growth  and  value 
has confirmed exciting mineralised zones.  
  Discovering a new extensive palaeochannel system  at our Hirabeb tenement in Namibia, where scout drilling 
and 
  Discovering high-grade mineralisation within the extensive palaeochannels on our Koppies tenement in Namibia; 
  Adding further to our strategic Namibian exploration ground position;   
of Australian uranium assets;  
  Adding 48 million pounds of high-grade uranium resources to our asset base, through the acquisition of a portfolio 
including: 
I am pleased to write to you following a year in which your Company substantially advanced its strategic objectives, 
Dear Shareholder, 
Chairman’s Letter 
 
 
 
 
 
Review of Operations 
OVERVIEW 
The 2020 financial year proved to be transformative for the Company, adding two uranium discoveries in Namibia 
and  the  acquisition  of  over  48  million  pounds  of  U3O8  resources  in  Australia,  to  our  existing  Marenica  Project 
resources. 
The  discovery  of  extensive  uranium  mineralisation  within  an  expansive  palaeochannel  system  at  Hirabeb 
demonstrates the Company’s ability to discover new uranium projects at low cost.  There remains extensive untested 
potential  at  Hirabeb,  Marenica’s  largest  tenement  in  Namibia,  and  the  Company  is  excited  about  continuing 
exploration of this tenement. 
Marenica has continued a highly successful exploration program at Koppies after drilling the first hole in July 2019.  
A large palaeochannel system has been identified with drilling indicating an approximate grade of 300 to 350 ppm 
U3O8. 
Adding significance to these discoveries is that the application of Marenica’s proprietary and patented U-pgradeTM 
process  could  potentially  halve the  capital and  operating cost of  development for these  styles of  deposits,  hence 
potentially lowering the threshold uranium price for their development and significantly increasing their value. 
Marenica  finalised  the  acquisition  of  uranium  projects  in  the  Northern  Territory  and  Western  Australia  containing 
JORC resources of 48.4 Mlb of U3O8 at an average grade of 859 ppm U3O8 during the year.  The company believes 
that they can add value to these assets through further geological work and application of the U-pgradeTM process 
or part thereof to these ore sources.  
Marenica is delivering on its business strategy to acquire and explore tenements with uranium mineralisation styles 
suitable for value adding through application of its breakthrough proprietary U-pgradeTM beneficiation process.   
Impact of COVID 
For  Marenica,  like  most  of  the  mining  industry  in  Namibia  and  Australia,  the  COVID-19  pandemic  has  had  some 
impact  on  operations,  although  thankfully  to  date  these  have  been  relatively  minor.    The  pandemic  restricted 
exploration  activities  in  Namibia  for  a  short  period  of  time  and  although  the  Erongo  region  of  Namibia  entered  a 
second  lockdown  period  in  June  2020,  mining  and  exploration  were  exempt  and  Marenica’s  exploration  program 
continued.  In Australia the impact has been greater, with restrictions on travel to projects in the Northern Territory 
and  in  the  north  of  Western  Australia  due  to  biosecurity  risks.    Ground  based  exploration  in  Australia  has  been 
suspended and the Company is currently undertaking desktop exploration by analysing historical data. 
Due  to  restricted  vehicle  movements  and  reduced  industry  activity  during  this  pandemic  the  airborne  pollution  in 
many countries has been reduced, and countries can now see the benefit of reduced pollution levels.  This is likely 
to reinforce the value and benefits of reliable base load low carbon emission energy that is generated by nuclear. 
Namibian Exploration Process 
In  Namibia,  Marenica  is  targeting  uranium  mineralisation  contained  within  historical  river  systems,  known  as 
palaeochannels, where calcrete hosted uranium mineralisation can occur, the same style of mineralisation used to 
develop  Marenica’s  U-pgradeTM  uranium  beneficiation  process.    The  Company  is  therefore  confident  that  
U-pgradeTM could be successfully applied if mining and processing operations were developed at Koppies or any of 
the Namibian tenements, for a consequent significant reduction in development costs compared to Marenica’s peers 
with similar grade ores in Namibia. 
These palaeochannel deposits are referred to as surficial deposits due to their close proximity to the surface and in 
general the palaeochannels are no deeper than 30 metres.  The style of uranium mineralisation is also known as 
secondary  uranium  mineralisation  as  the  uranium  in  the  deposit  has  been  relocated  from  a  primary  source  and 
reprecipitated. 
These  palaeochannels  have  no  obvious  surface  expression  nor  do  they  emit  sufficient  radiation  that  could  be 
detected  at  surface  and  therefore  used  to  locate  the  palaeochannels.    Marenica  are  using  a  ground  based 
geophysical measuring system known as Horizontal Loop Electromagnetics (“HLEM”) to identify the outlines of the 
5 
 
 
Review of Operations 
palaeochannels, with drilling used to validate the accuracy of the HLEM.  Both Rotary Air Blast (“RAB”) and Reverse 
Circulation (“RC”) drilling techniques have been used in the exploration program to date. 
Koppies Uranium Project (EPL 6987) – Namibia 
The exploration program at Koppies commenced with drilling programs targeting areas which were extrapolated from 
mineralisation  identified  by  Deep  Yellow  Limited  (“Deep  Yellow”)  across  the  tenement  boundary  in  the  west.  
Subsequent exploration was conducted iteratively and alternated between HLEM and drilling to arrive at the current 
outcome (refer Figure 1), which resulted in the delineation of a 6.4 km² palaeochannel system outline and significant 
mineralisation identified in drill intervals within the area drilled to date.   
Figure 1 – Koppies (EPL 6987) 
The best intersections from drilling at Koppies include: 
  KP004 
  6 m at 432 ppm U3O8 from 7 m 
  KP045 
o 
  KP055 
o 
10 m at 687 ppm U3O8 from 2 m 
Including 2 m at 1,974 ppm U3O8  
13 m at 905 ppm U3O8 from 3 m  
Including 2 m at 4,504 ppm U3O8  
  KOR2 
  6 m at 354 ppm U3O8 from 1 m 
  KOR21 
11 m at 502 ppm U3O8 from 6 m 
  KOR62 
o 
3 m at 3,087 ppm U3O8 from 1 m 
Including 1 m at 7,060 ppm U3O8 
6 
 
 
 
 
Review of Operations 
The average depth of the 90 holes drilled in the Koppies palaeochannel system is 12 metres, with the deepest hole 
drilled to a depth of 22 metres.  This indicates the shallow nature of the mineralisation in this system and the low cost 
for drilling due to the shallow depth of holes.  For full details of the Koppies drill intersections refer to the following 
ASX  announcements  –  27/08/19  ‘Marenica  Identifies  Significant  Grade  Mineralisation  at  Koppies’,  07/11/19  ‘Drill 
Results Deliver Exceptional Uranium Mineralisation at Koppies’, 10/02/20 ‘Koppies Drilling Intersects 1m at 7,060ppm 
U3O8’. 
New Discovery at Hirabeb 
On 21 July 2020 Marenica announced a new uranium discovery from its maiden scout RC drilling program at Hirabeb 
(EPL 7278).  Hirabeb is the second of Marenica’s tenements in the Namib Project Area to be explored.  With an area 
of 730 km2, Hirabeb is Marenica’s largest tenement in Namibia, 15 times the area of the Koppies tenement.  The 
exploration program identified a massive palaeochannel system, with the major palaeochannel extending from the 
northeast  corner  to  the  southwest  corner  of  the  tenement,  a  distance  of  over  36  kilometres.    To  put  this  into 
perspective the palaeochannel is longer than the width of the English Channel, as shown in Figure 2.   
The main palaeochannel is mineralised for the majority of its length, providing Marenica with a multitude of follow up 
exploration targets with the potential to host a significant uranium deposit.  The drill lines completed in this scouting 
program are on average 5.5 kilometres apart, greater than the width of the Koppies mineralised area.  Consequently, 
there is significant upside potential for large scale uranium deposits along the identified palaeochannel as well as in 
other areas of the tenement. 
This is an exciting new uranium discovery in an area not previously explored using modern exploration techniques.  
Marenica  consider  this  to  potentially  be  the  most  significant  new  uranium  discovery  in  Namibia  since  Extract 
Resources discovered Husab in 2008. 
Figure 2 – Comparison of the Hirabeb Palaeochannel with the English Channel 
7 
 
 
 
 
Review of Operations 
The maiden scout exploration program included HLEM surveys and an RC drilling program of 120 holes.  The location 
of the drill holes and HLEM survey lines and the potential extent of the palaeochannels is shown in Figure 3.  Note 
there are large areas of the tenement yet to be explored, including in the northwest and southeast. 
Detailed  follow-up  work  will  include  the  identification  of  geological  characteristics  along  the  palaeochannels  that 
would be suited to increased deposition of mobile uranium that has precipitated to form these calcrete hosted uranium 
deposits.   
Figure 3 – Location of Hirabeb HLEM Survey Lines, Drill Holes and Potential Extent of Palaeochannels 
The best intersections from drilling at Hirabeb include: 
  HIR050 
10 m at 242 ppm eU3O8 from 16 m 
o 
Including 2 m at 787 ppm eU3O8  
  HIR070 
  4 m at 193 ppm eU3O8 from 4 m 
o 
Including 1 m at 462 ppm eU3O8  
  HIR075 
  6 m at 153 ppm eU3O8 from surface 
o 
Including 1 m at 334 ppm eU3O8   
8 
 
 
 
 
 
Review of Operations 
Largest Land Package for Nuclear Fuel (Uranium) Minerals in Namibia 
The Erongo region of Namibia contains the fourth highest aggregate of uranium mineral resources of any region in 
the world and has a long history of uranium discovery and production. The region’s world scale Rossing Uranium 
Mine commenced operation in 1976 and has been operating continuously for 44 years.   
Marenica has three uranium project areas in the Erongo Region: 
  Namib Project,  
  Marenica Project, and 
  Mile 72 Project.   
The Koppies and Hirabeb projects are located in the Namib Project Area (Figure 4) where Marenica has a contiguous 
land package of 1,988 km² across six active tenements.  The strategy to acquire land in the Namib Area was initiated 
following  development  of  a  geological  model  built  on  the  theory  of  deposition  of  soluble  uranium  within  historical 
palaeochannels.  Marenica also sourced historical General Mining Union Corporation Limited (“Gencor”) maps and 
reports from exploration activities in the 1970’s in which extensive fieldwork identified exploration targets.  The vast 
majority  of  these  exploration  targets  are  located  east  of  the  known  deposits  of  Langer  Heinrich,  Tumas  and 
Aussinanis, and inside the Marenica tenements.  The identification of exploration targets led Marenica to apply for 
tenements between the known deposits and the foot of the Khomas Highlands in the east (dark brown area in Figure 
4).   
The Namib area is highly prospective for uranium with over 275 Mlb of JORC resources downstream of Marenica’s 
tenements,  230  Mlb  of  which  are  calcrete  hosted  uranium  deposits,  greatly  improving  the  potential  for  continued 
exploration success. 
Figure 4 – Namib Project Area 
9 
 
 
 
Review of Operations 
At year end, Marenica held ten active tenements in the Erongo Region of Namibia covering 2,899 km², with a further 
four tenements under application (Figure 5). 
Figure 5 – Marenica's tenements in the Erongo Region of Namibia 
Marenica’s  tenements  in  the  north  of  the  Erongo  region  are  also  highly  prospective  for  calcrete  hosted  uranium 
mineralisation, the Marenica Uranium Project has a JORC resource of 61 Mlb of U3O8. 
Marenica Uranium Project Resource 
The Marenica Uranium Project includes the Marenica deposit and the smaller MA7 deposit, 5 km to the southeast of 
the main resource.  Both are calcrete hosted uranium deposits located in the same palaeochannel system that hosts 
Orano’s Trekkopje uranium deposit, which has similar mineralogical characteristics to the Marenica Uranium Project.   
The Marenica Project has a Mineral Resource of 61 Mlb at 93 ppm U3O8 at a 50 ppm cut-off grade, Marenica owns 
75% of this Mineral Resource.  
10 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Review of Operations 
Table 1 – Marenica Project Resource Estimate 
Deposit 
Category 
Cut-off 
(ppm 
U3O8) 
Total Resource 
Tonnes 
(M) 
U3O8 
(ppm) 
U3O8 
(Mlb)  Holding 
Marenica’s Share 
U3O8 
(ppm) 
Tonnes 
(M) 
U3O8 
(Mlb) 
Marenica 
Marenica  
Indicated 
Inferred 
Total 
50 
50 
50 
26.5 
249.6 
276.1 
110 
92 
94 
6.4 
50.9 
57.3 
Marenica 
MA7 
MA7  
Inferred 
Total 
MA7 
Namibia Resource Total 
The Marenica and MA7 Mineral Resources were prepared and first disclosed under the JORC Code 2004.  These 
estimates have not been updated since to comply with JORC Code 2012 on the basis that the information that the 
estimates are derived from has not materially changed since it was last reported. 
22.8 
22.8 
298.9 
4.0 
4.0 
61.3 
17.1 
224.2 
81 
81 
93 
81 
93 
50 
50 
207.1 
75% 
75% 
94 
43.0 
3.0 
46.0 
Namibian Uranium Association 
Marenica is a long standing and proud member of the Namibian Uranium Association (“NUA”).  The NUA are the 
leading point of contact for government, media, stakeholders, general public and anybody interested in the position 
and policies of the Namibian uranium industry.  Membership of the NUA signifies adherence to a strong sustainable 
development ethos, product stewardship and compliance with the Namibian legislative framework. 
Australian Uranium Projects 
During  December  2019,  approval  was  obtained  from  Marenica’s  and  Optimal  Mining  Limited’s  (“Optimal”) 
shareholders to acquire subsidiaries of Optimal (“Acquisition Entities”) that owned tenements and Mineral Resources 
in Australia (“Acquisition Assets”).   
Marenica acquired 100% of the share capital of the Acquisition Entities for a consideration of A$250,000 cash and 
27.5 million fully paid ordinary shares in Marenica.  The purchase price is equivalent to A$0.06 (US$0.04) per pound 
of JORC resources. 
The Acquisition Assets own the Angela, Thatcher Soak, Oobagooma and Minerva project areas and joint venture 
holdings in the Bigrlyi, Malawiri,  Walbiri and Areva joint ventures and added 48.4 Mlb U3O8 of high-grade  mineral 
resources to Marenica’s asset base.  The mineral resources are significant in their own right but their value could be 
enhanced when coupled with Marenica’s U-pgradeTM beneficiation process.  
The Acquisition Assets are significantly more advanced than most of Marenica’s Namibian tenements.  Most already 
have estimated mineral resources, one has an historical resource that cannot be reported, and the remainder are 
joint venture interests.   
All but Thatcher Soak were formerly held by Paladin Energy Limited (“Paladin”), however, it is Marenica’s view that 
Paladin had other priorities and did not thoroughly explore these assets.  Thus, it is Marenica’s view these assets 
are underdeveloped, presenting an opportunity for Marenica to add value.   
The project locations of the Acquisition Assets are shown in Figure 6 and the JORC resources listed in Table 2. 
11 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Review of Operations 
Figure 6 – Location of Tenements  
Table 2 – Uranium Mineral Resources in Australia 
Cut-off 
(ppm 
U3O8) 
Total Resource 
Tonnes 
(M) 
U3O8 
(ppm) 
U3O8 
(Mlb) 
Holding  Tonnes 
Marenica’s Share 
U3O8 
(ppm) 
(M) 
U3O8 
(Mlb) 
300 
150 
10.7  1,310 
425 
11.6 
850 
22.3 
30.8 
10.9 
41.7 
100% 
100% 
100% 
10.7  1,310 
425 
11.6 
850 
22.3 
30.8 
10.9 
41.7 
Deposit 
Category 
100% Holding 
Inferred 
Angela * 
Thatcher Soak 
Inferred 
100% Held Resource Total 
Bigrlyi Joint Venture 
Bigrlyi Deposit *  
Indicated 
Inferred 
500 
500 
500 
200 
200 
200 
200 
4.7  1,366 
2.8  1,144 
7.5  1,283 
259 
1.01 
281 
0.26 
371 
0.24 
556 
1.24 
10.2  1,049 
14.0 
7.1 
21.1 
0.57 
0.16 
0.19 
1.52 
23.5 
20.82% 
20.82% 
20.82% 
1.55  1,283 
259 
0.21 
281 
0.05 
Bigrlyi Deposit Total 
Inferred 
Sundberg 
Inferred 
Hill One JV 
Inferred 
Hill One EME 
Inferred 
Karins 
Bigrlyi Joint Venture Total 
Walbiri Joint Venture 
Joint Venture 
100% EME 
Walbiri Total 
Malawiri Joint Venture 
Malawiri JV 
Joint Venture Resource Total 
Australia Resource Total 
Angela and Bigrlyi Mineral Resources were prepared and first disclosed under the JORC Code 2004.  These estimates 
have not been updated since to comply with JORC Code 2012 on the basis that the information that the estimates are 
derived from has not materially changed since it was last reported. 
0.42  1,288 
847 
21.6 
848 
43.9 
0.10  1,288 
923 
3.34 
859 
25.6 
556 
0.26 
2.07  1,065 
Inferred 
Inferred 
20.82% 
20.82% 
1.20 
40.2 
81.9 
5.1 
5.9 
11.0 
7.1 
8.4 
15.5 
200 
200 
200 
636 
646 
641 
Inferred 
23.97% 
22.88% 
1.16 
100 
636 
4.39 
0.12 
0.03 
0.32 
4.86 
1.63 
0.29 
6.77 
48.4 
12 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
 
  
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
  
  
  
 
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
 
  
 
 
  
 
  
  
  
  
Review of Operations 
Minerva Project (100%)  
The Minerva Project covers exploration licences located in the Ngalia Basin approximately 170 km northwest of Alice 
Springs  in  the  Northern  Territory  (see  Figure  7).    The  Ngalia  Basin  is  an  intercontinental  trough  filled  with  Late 
Proterozoic to Carboniferous age sediments and surrounded by the Proterozoic Arunta Block, its dimensions are 300 
km in east-west length and up to 70 km wide.  The Ngalia Basin  is a uranium rich area, it  is host to a  number of 
Marenica’s uranium projects as well as other uranium projects. 
Figure 7 – Minerva deposit geological setting 
Minerva was explored by Agip Australia Pty Ltd and Central Pacific Minerals NL during the 1970’s and early 1980’s.  
A number of drilling programs were completed but a JORC resource has not been estimated. 
Marenica completed a detailed review of extensive historical drill data from the Minerva Uranium Project.  The data 
review identified 49 mineralised drill holes with sample uranium grades greater than 250 ppm U3O8, including 29 drill 
intervals with sample grades in excess of 10,000 ppm or 1.0% U3O8.  The exploration results have identified uranium 
mineralisation over a 2,400 metre strike length (Figure 8). 
Significant uranium intercepts from drilling include: 
Y116RD – 11 m at   4,218 ppm U3O8 from 129.5 m incl. 0.5 m at 41,200 ppm U3O8 from 138.0 m 
Y134RD –   4 m at   4,334 ppm U3O8 from 145.0 m incl. 0.5 m at 25,000 ppm U3O8 from 146.5 m 
And 15.5 m at   2,313 ppm U3O8 from 166.0 m incl. 1.0 m at 18,300 ppm U3O8 from 179.0 m 
Y153RD –   9 m at   2,667 ppm U3O8 from 229.0 m incl. 0.5 m at 26,400 ppm U3O8 from 237.0 m 
Y158RD - 5.5 m at 11,131 ppm U3O8 from 117.5 m incl. 2.0 m at 20,725 ppm U3O8 from 118.0 m 
Y166RD - 3.5 m at 17,843 ppm U3O8 from 277.5 m 
In addition to the  high-grade uranium mineralisation, high-grade gold was present in one  of the  two drill holes on 
which detailed gold assays are available.  Hole Y153RD included 0.5 m at 19.2 g/t Au from 143.5 m, and 0.5 m at 
13 
 
 
 
 
 
Review of Operations 
2.3 g/t Au from 141.5 m, with the gold intervals contained within a broader uranium mineralised zone of 8.5 m at 653 
ppm U3O8.  A second drill hole assayed for gold (Y160RD) did not contain either uranium or gold mineralisation. 
The  presence  of  significant  gold  values  in  hole  Y153RD  suggests  that  there  is  potential  for  additional  gold 
mineralisation  to  be  associated  with  the  existing  uranium  mineralisation  within  the  deposit.    Refer  to  the  ASX 
announcement dated 05/05/20 ‘High Grade Uranium and Gold at Minerva Uranium Project, NT.’ for full details. 
Figure 8 – Drill hole layout, note the proximity of the Tanami road 
Marenica Team 
To  enable  Marenica  to  support  the  expansion  of  exploration  activities  on  its  large  uranium  tenement  position  in 
Namibia and on its extensive Australian uranium tenements and deposits, the exploration team was expanded with 
several key additions.  The new team members have been engaged via flexible part-time employment and consulting 
arrangements which provides access to critical skills for Marenica, on a cost effective basis. 
Jessica Bezuidenhout was appointed “General Manager - Namibia”.  Ms Bezuidenhout is an environmental scientist 
with  13  years  exploration  and  mining  experience  in  Australia  and  Namibia.    Ms  Bezuidenhout  is  responsible  for 
overseeing the smooth running of the Namibian operations, she will ensure that exploration activities are completed 
under the most efficient and optimal conditions.   
Berti Roesener was appointed “Consulting Exploration Manager - Namibia”.  Mr Roesener is a geologist with over 
33  years  geological  experience  in  Namibia,  in  particular,  on  the  mineralisation  type  targeted  by  Marenica,  being 
calcrete  hosted  uranium  mineralisation.    Mr  Roesener  is  author  of  the  uranium  chapter  of  the  book  on  “Mineral 
Resources of Namibia”. 
Dave Princep was appointed “Consulting Geologist” and will oversee, from a technical point of view,  all planning, 
execution and analysis of exploration activities in Namibia and Australia.  Mr Princep has extensive experience on 
exploration for calcrete hosted uranium mineralisation and mining in Namibia, having worked for Paladin and Deep 
Yellow on their projects in Namibia, over the last 16 years.  Whilst working at Paladin, Mr Princep also prepared or 
oversaw the mineral resource estimates on the majority of the Australian assets (as they were previously owned by 
Paladin) and therefore, he has invaluable knowledge of these assets. 
The addition of these highly experienced personnel to the Marenica exploration team, has supported the acceleration 
of exploration activities.   
14 
 
 
 
 
Review of Operations 
U-pgradeTM Beneficiation Process  
U-pgradeTM  is  a  potential  industry  leading  and  economically  transformational  beneficiation  process  for  upgrading 
surficial uranium ores.   
This breakthrough process was developed on ore from Marenica’s namesake Marenica Uranium Project in Namibia 
and subsequently, testwork has been undertaken on ore samples from a number of other sources.   
In summary, Marenica has demonstrated, in bench scale testwork on the Marenica Uranium Project ore, that the  
U-pgradeTM beneficiation process; 
  Concentrates the uranium by a factor of 50 
 
Increases Marenica Uranium Project ore grade from 93 ppm to ~5,000 ppm U3O8  
  Rejects ~98% of the mass prior to leaching 
  Produces a high-grade concentrate in a low mass of ~2% (leach feed) 
  Rejects acid consumers  
  Potentially  reduces  operating  costs  by  ~50%  and  capital  costs  by  ~50%  as  compared  to  conventional 
processing. 
  Similar results in fresh and sea water, which is particularly beneficial in a dry environment such as Namibia. 
Beyond application at the Marenica Uranium Project, Marenica has determined, through bench scale testing, that 
Deep Yellow’s Tumas and Aussinanis deposits, Paladin’s Langer Heinrich deposit, Orano’s Trekkopje deposit and 
Toro Energy’s Wiluna deposits, are amongst those that are amenable to the U-pgradeTM process. 
Mineral Resources 
All of the Company’s Mineral Resources are internally peer reviewed at the  time of estimation and  are subject to 
ongoing review, as and when required.  The Australian Mineral Resources were first reported by Marenica on 4 July 
2019 (“Uranium Resource Base Increased by 48 Mlbs to 110 Mlbs”), when the Company announced the acquisition 
of the Mineral Resources from Optimal Mining Limited, which was at the time subject to shareholder and regulatory 
approval.  The Australian Mineral Resource estimates included in this report have not changed since 4 July 2019, 
Marenica’s share of these resources remain at 25.6 Mt at 859 ppm U3O8 for 48.4 Mlb U3O8 (see Table 3). 
The Namibian Mineral Resources have not changed since last reported in the 2019 Annual Report and remain at 
224.2 Mt at 93 ppm U3O8 for 46 Mlb U3O8 (see Table 3). 
Governance and Internal Controls 
The  Company  maintains  thorough  QAQC  protocols  for  conducting  exploration,  site  practice,  sampling,  safety, 
monitoring and rehabilitation. 
Drilling methods vary according to the nature of the prospect under evaluation.  These can include rotary air blast or 
reverse  circulation  drilling  for  unconsolidated  formations.    Typically,  resource  estimations  are  based  on  a  mix  of 
downhole  radiometric  sampling  and  chemical  assaying.    Assay  samples  are  collected  over  one  metre  intervals.  
Radiometric data is acquired at 10 cm intervals and composited to one metre intervals.  Where statistical validation 
confirms radiometric and chemical assay equivalence, the resource estimate is primarily based on the radiometric 
data. 
Drill hole collars are DGPS-surveyed by in-house operators, after an initial pick-up by hand-held GPS.  Downhole 
radiometric surveys are outsourced to independent contractors. 
Drill hole sample logging captures a suite of lithologic, alteration, mineralogic and hand-held radiometric data, at one 
metre intervals.  This data is captured as permanent hard copy prior to digital input onto an in-house database. 
Drill plans and sections generated from drilling and surface mapping are used to constrain wireframe mineralisation 
models; upon which resource estimations are made. 
15 
 
 
Review of Operations 
Table 3 – Uranium Mineral Resources  
Deposit 
Category 
Cut-off 
(ppm 
U3O8) 
Total Resource 
Tonnes 
(M) 
U3O8 
(ppm) 
U3O8 
(Mlb)  Holding 
Marenica’s Share 
U3O8 
(ppm) 
Tonnes 
(M) 
U3O8 
(Mlb) 
100% Holding 
Inferred 
Angela  
Thatcher Soak 
Inferred 
100% Held Resource Total 
Bigrlyi Joint Venture 
Bigrlyi Deposit  
Indicated 
Inferred 
Bigrlyi Deposit Total 
Inferred 
Sundberg 
Inferred 
Hill One JV 
Inferred 
Hill One EME 
Karins 
Inferred 
Bigrlyi Joint Venture Total 
Walbiri Joint Venture 
Joint Venture 
100% EME 
Walbiri Total 
Malawiri Joint Venture 
Malawiri JV 
Joint Venture Resource Total 
Australia Resource Total 
Inferred 
Inferred 
Inferred 
Marenica 
Marenica  
Indicated 
Inferred 
Total 
Marenica 
MA7 
Inferred 
MA7  
MA7 
Total 
Namibia Resource Total 
300 
150 
500 
500 
500 
200 
200 
200 
200 
200 
200 
200 
100 
50 
50 
50 
50 
50 
AUSTRALIA 
10.7  1,310 
425 
11.6 
850 
22.3 
4.7  1,366 
2.8  1,144 
7.5  1,283 
259 
1.01 
281 
0.26 
371 
0.24 
1.24 
556 
10.2  1,049 
5.1 
5.9 
11.0 
636 
646 
641 
0.42  1,288 
847 
21.6 
848 
43.9 
NAMIBIA 
26.5 
249.6 
276.1 
22.8 
22.8 
298.9 
110 
92 
94 
81 
81 
93 
30.8 
10.9 
41.7 
14.0 
7.1 
21.1 
0.57 
0.16 
0.19 
1.52 
23.5 
7.1 
8.4 
15.5 
1.20 
40.2 
81.9 
6.4 
50.9 
57.3 
4.0 
4.0 
61.3 
100% 
100% 
100% 
10.7  1,310 
425 
11.6 
850 
22.3 
30.8 
10.9 
41.7 
20.82% 
20.82% 
20.82% 
1.55  1,283 
259 
0.21 
281 
0.05 
20.82% 
20.82% 
0.26 
556 
2.07  1,065 
4.39 
0.12 
0.03 
0.32 
4.86 
22.88% 
1.16 
636 
1.63 
23.97% 
0.10  1,288 
923 
3.34 
859 
25.6 
0.29 
6.77 
48.4 
75% 
207.1 
94 
43.0 
75% 
17.1 
224.2 
81 
93 
3.0 
46.0 
The  Mineral  Resource  Estimate  for  the  Angela,  Bigrlyi,  Marenica  and  MA7  resources  in  the  table  above  were 
prepared and first disclosed under the 2004 Edition of the Australian Code for the Reporting of Exploration Results, 
Minerals Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC Code 2004).  It has not been updated since to comply with the 2012 
Edition  of  the  Australian  Code  for  the  Reporting  of  Exploration  Results,  Minerals  Resources  and  Ore  Reserves 
(JORC  Code  2012)  on  the  basis  that  the  information  has  not  materially  changed  since  it  was  last  reported.    A 
Competent  Person  has  not  undertaken  sufficient  work  to  classify  the  estimate  of  the  Mineral  Resource  in 
accordance with the JORC Code 2012; it is possible that following evaluation and/or further exploration work the 
currently  reported  estimate  may  materially  change  and  hence  will  need  to  be  reported  afresh  under  and  in 
accordance with the JORC Code 2012.  
16 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
 
  
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
  
  
  
 
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
 
  
 
 
  
 
  
  
  
  
 
  
 
 
  
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Review of Operations 
The Competent Person that completed the most recent Mineral Resource estimate for each project is listed as 
follows. 
Accountability 
Competent Person 
Employer 
Angela 
Mr David Princep 
Paladin Energy Limited 
Thatcher Soak 
Mr Peter Gleeson 
SRK Consulting 
Bigrlyi 
Mr Arnold van der Heyden 
Helman & Schofield Pty Ltd 
Sundberg / Hill One 
Mr Dimitry Pertel and Dr Maxim Seredkin  CSA Global Ltd 
Karins 
Walbiri 
Malawiri 
Marenica  
MA7 
Mr Dimitry Pertel and Dr Maxim Seredkin  CSA Global Ltd 
Mr Dimitry Pertel and Dr Maxim Seredkin  CSA Global Ltd 
Dr Maxim Seredkin 
Mr Ian Glacken 
Mr Ian Glacken 
CSA Global Ltd 
Optiro Pty Ltd 
Optiro Pty Ltd 
The information in this Annual Mineral Resource Statement relating to exploration activities and Mineral Resources 
is based on information compiled by David Princep B.Sc P.Geo FAusIMM (CP) who is an independent consultant 
and  who  is  a  member  of  the  AusIMM.    Mr  Princep  has  sufficient  experience  that  is  relevant  to  the  style  of 
mineralisation  and  type  of  deposit  under  consideration  and  to  the  activity  that  he  is  undertaking  to  qualify  as 
Competent Person as defined in the  2012 Edition of the “Australasian Code for  Reporting of  Exploration Results, 
Mineral  Resources  and  Ore  Reserves”.    Mr  Princep  consents  to  the  inclusion  of  this  information  in  the  form  and 
context in which it appears. 
17 
 
 
 
 
Directors’ Report 
Your Directors present their report on the group consisting of Marenica Energy Limited and the entities it controlled 
at the end of, or during, the year ended 30 June 2020 (“Group”). 
DIRECTORS 
The following persons were Directors of Marenica Energy Limited during or since the end of the financial year and 
up to the date of this report. Directors were in office for the entire period unless otherwise stated. 
Names, qualifications, experience and special responsibilities 
Andrew Bantock 
Independent Non-executive Chairman 
Appointed 1 February 2018 
Mr. Bantock is a Senior Managing Director of international corporate advisory firm FTI Consulting, where he co-leads 
the Australian Mining and Mining Services Practice. 
Mr Bantock has operated as CFO, Chairman, CEO and Director of international, ASX listed, government sector and 
private corporations. Previous roles include: CFO of Glencore Xstrata plc’s Australian nickel business; Director of 
Water Corporation, Western Australia’s water utility, where he also chaired the audit committee; Chairman, CEO and 
Corporate Director of an ASX listed multi-commodity minerals exploration group; and Finance Director of ASX/NZSE 
listed GRD Ltd, owner of New Zealand’s largest gold miner and GRD Minproc, a world class mining construction and 
development engineer. 
During the last three years, Mr. Bantock has not been a director of any other listed companies. 
Murray Hill – B.Sc. (Metallurgy), FAusIMM  
Chief Executive Officer - Appointed 1 May 2012  
Managing Director - Appointed 2 May 2016 
Mr. Hill has 36 years’ experience in the mining industry.  He is a respected metallurgist with extensive experience in 
the  design,  operation  and  commissioning  of  gold,  uranium  and  base  metal  process  plants.    His  experience  was 
broadened by management of a metallurgical testwork laboratory and his role as a process engineer in an engineering 
group, and he is well  experienced in uranium metallurgy.    For the 10 years prior to joining the Company, Mr. Hill 
operated his own business providing metallurgical consulting services to the mining industry world-wide.  Mr. Hill is a 
Fellow of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. 
During the last three years, Mr. Hill has not been a director of any other listed companies. 
Nelson Chen – Master of Applied Finance, CA 
Non-executive Director 
Appointed 29 November 2011 
Mr. Chen is a Director of Hanlong Resources Limited and a Chartered Accountant in Australia. He holds postgraduate 
degrees 
joining  Hanlong,  Mr.  Chen  spent  over  11  years  with 
PricewaterhouseCoopers, Sydney office, in their audit and M&A advisory practice. Mr. Chen served on the board of 
Australia China Business Council, NSW for over six years. 
finance  and  accounting.  Prior 
to 
in 
During the last three years, Mr. Chen has been a director of the following listed companies: 
-  Young Australian Mines Limited* – appointed 23 April 2010. 
* Denotes current directorship 
18 
 
 
 
 
 
Directors’ Report 
Directors' interests 
The interests of Directors in securities of the Company are: 
Director 
M Hill 
N Chen 
A Bantock 
Fully Paid Ordinary Shares 
Options 
Performance 
Rights 
At 30 June 2020 
At 30 June 2019 
3,963,911 
2,647,496 
857,895 
2,542,858 
7,200,000 
202,500 
1,331,707 
2,142,857 
200,000 
2,000,000 
- 
- 
Shane McBride B.Bus (Acct), FCPA, FGIA, FCG (CS, CGP), MAICD 
Chief Financial Officer - Appointed 1 May 2017 
Company Secretary - Appointed 8 June 2017 
Shane McBride has 38 years of commercial management experience gained in listed Australian public companies 
including  corporate  management,  project  development  and  mine  site  operations  management,  management  and 
financial accounting, corporate finance, investor relations and company secretarial functions.  He has a BBus (Acct) 
degree, is a Fellow of CPA Australia, Fellow of Governance Institute of  Australia and The Chartered Governance 
Institute; and is a Member of the Australian Institute of Directors. 
Mr  McBride  has  been  intimately  involved  with  exploration,  development,  scoping  and  pre-feasibility  studies,  and 
financing activities. He was the managing director of an ASX listed mining company which acquired and operated an 
operating SX/EW Copper Cathode production facility in Queensland, Australia and has substantial experience as a 
listed company director.  
DIVIDENDS 
No dividends have been provided for or paid by the Group in respect of the year ended 30 June 2020 (30 June 2019: 
Nil). 
PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES 
The principal activities of the Group during the course of the financial year was to create value through exploration 
and  evaluation  of  its mineral tenements  through  the  potential  application  of the Company’s  patented U-pgradeTM 
uranium beneficiation process to its own mineral tenements and those of third parties. 
OPERATING RESULTS FOR THE YEAR 
The  total  loss  of  the  Group  attributable  to  the  owners  of  Marenica  Energy  Limited  for  the  financial  year  was 
$1,658,605 (2019: $1,296,861). 
FINANCIAL POSITION AND SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN THE STATE OF AFFAIRS 
The  Group  has  significantly  improved  its  balance  sheet  position  during  the  year  after  reporting  net  assets  of 
$3,924,259 from a net assets position of $503,750 at 30 June 2019. This is as a result of the Company acquiring the 
interests  in  three  Australian  subsidiaries  (“Acquisition  Entities”)  of  Optimal  Mining  Limited  (“Optimal”)  which 
collectively hold sixteen mining tenements and joint venture interests in twenty-eight mining tenements in Western 
Australia and the Northern Territory that are prospective for uranium (“Acquisition Assets”).   
Cash on hand at 30 June 2020 was $1,062,967 (2019: $487,862). 
19 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Directors’ Report 
On  4  July  2019,  the  Company  announced  that  it  executed  a  binding  term  sheet  with  Optimal  Mining  Limited 
(“Optimal”) for  the acquisition  of tenements and minerals resources  in  Australia  (“Acquisition  Assets”).   Following 
shareholder approval from both Marenica and Optimal shareholders, on 13 December 2019, the Company acquired 
subsidiary  companies  of  Optimal,  which  owned  the  Acquisition  Assets,  by  paying  cash  of  $250,000  and  issuing 
27,500,000 convertible preference shares (“CPS”).  On 16 December 2019, Optimal in-specie distributed the CPS to 
its shareholders, at which time the CPS automatically converted into ordinary shares in Marenica.  The total cost of 
Acquisition Assets at the reporting date was $3,145,885. 
Other than the changes mentioned above, there were no significant changes in the state of affairs of the consolidated 
entity during the financial year. 
MATTERS SUBSEQUENT TO THE END OF THE FINANCIAL YEAR 
On 3 July 2020, the Company announced that it issued 26,349,989 Placement Options to those who participated in 
the Placement which raised $1,001,300. The Placement consisted of two tranches: 
(a) 
The issue on 17 April 2020 of 13,157,894 Shares at an issue price of $0.038 per Share; and 
(b) 
The issue on 15 June 2020 of 13,192,095 Shares at an issue price of $0.038 per Share 
The Placement  Options were granted  on the  basis  of  one Option  for  every  Share  subscribed. The  company also 
announced that it issued 1,000,000 Broker Options to the participating brokers. The Placement Options and Broker 
Options are exercisable at $0.10 within three years of grant.  
The impact of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic is ongoing and therefore, it is not practicable to estimate the 
potential impact, positive or negative, after the reporting date. The situation is rapidly developing and is dependent 
on  measures  imposed  by  the  Australian  Government  and  other  countries,  such  as  maintaining  social  distancing 
requirements, quarantine, travel restrictions and any economic stimulus that may be provided. 
Other than the matters referred to above, there have been no matters or circumstances that have arisen since the 
end of the financial year which significantly affected or may significantly affect: 
(i) 
(ii) 
the Group's operations in future years; or 
the results of those operations in future years; or 
(iii) 
the Group's state of affairs in future years. 
LIKELY DEVELOPMENTS AND BUSINESS STRATEGY 
The Company intends to continue to explore and evaluate its mineral tenements and potentially apply its patented 
U-pgrade™ uranium beneficiation process to the development of those mineral tenements. 
ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS 
The  Company’s  environmental  obligations  are  regulated  by  the  laws  of  the  Commonwealth  of  Australia  and  the 
Republic of Namibia. The Company has complied with its environmental performance obligations. No environmental 
breaches have been notified by any Government agency to the date of this Directors’ Report. 
SHARE OPTIONS 
At the date of this report, the unissued ordinary shares of the Company under option are as follows: 
Expiry Date 
Exercise Price 
Number under Option 
13 December 2020 
13 December 2020 
13 December 2020 
30 November 2021 
$0.17 
$0.17 
$0.17 
$0.21 
20 
5,890,000 
2,000,000 
7,600,000 
422,233 
 
 
Directors’ Report 
11 December 2021 
30 June 2023 
30 June 2023 
1 December 2023 
$0.17 
$0.10 
$0.10 
$0.17 
19,214,900 
26,349,989 
1,000,000 
7,600,000 
The Options do not entitle the holder to participate in any share issue of the Company or any other body corporate. 
During or since the end of the financial year the Company has not issued any shares as a result of the exercise of 
options. In regard to the Directors options with an expiry date of 30 November 2021, the Company is required to fund 
the exercise price in the event of exercise. 
INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS 
The Company has agreed to indemnify former and current directors and officers of the Company against all liabilities 
to another person and the Company that may arise from their position as directors and officers of the Company and 
its controlled entities, except where the liability arises out of conduct involving a wilful breach of duty. The agreement 
stipulates that the Company will meet the full amount of such liabilities including costs and expenses. 
During the year the Company has paid insurance premium for a Directors and Officers insurance policy negotiated 
at commercial terms. The terms of the insurance policies prevent the Company from disclosing the premium amount. 
During  or  since  the  financial  year-end,  in  respect  of  any  person  who  is,  or  has  been  an  officer  or  auditor  of  the 
Company or a related body corporate the Company has not: 
 
Indemnified  or  made  any  relevant  agreement  for  indemnifying  against  a  liability  incurred  as  an  officer, 
including costs and expenses in successfully defending legal proceedings; or 
  Paid or agreed to pay a premium in respect of a contract insuring against a liability incurred as an officer for 
the costs or expenses to defend legal proceedings. 
DIRECTORS' MEETINGS 
The number of meetings attended by each Director during the year is as follows: 
Directors 
Number of 
meetings held 
while in office 
5 
5 
5 
Number of 
meetings 
attended 
5 
5 
5 
Director 
M Hill 
A Bantock 
N Chen 
AUDITOR INDEPENDENCE AND NON-AUDIT SERVICES 
The auditor’s independence declaration for the year ended 30 June 2020 has been received and is located on the 
next page. 
NON-AUDIT SERVICES 
No non-audit services have been provided by the Company’s auditor.
21 
 
 
 
AUDITOR’S INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION UNDER SECTION 307C OF THE 
CORPORATIONS ACT 2001
As lead auditor of the audit of Marenica Energy Limited for the year ended 30 June 
2020, I declare that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, there have been:
no contraventions of the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations 
Act 2001 in relation to the audit; and
no contraventions of any applicable code of professional conduct in relation to the 
audit.
This declaration is in relation to Marenica Energy Limited and the entities it controlled 
during the year.
Rothsay Auditing
Daniel Dalla
Partner
30 September 2020
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
Remuneration Report – Audited 
This remuneration report for the year ended 30 June 2020 outlines remuneration arrangements of the Company and 
the  Group  in  accordance  with  the  requirements  of  the  Corporations  Act  2001  and  its  regulations  (the  Act).  This 
information has been audited as required by section 308(3C) of the Act. 
The  remuneration  report  details  the  remuneration  arrangements  for  key  management  personnel  (KMP)  who  are 
defined as those persons having authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the major activities 
of the Company and the Group, directly or indirectly, including any Director (whether executive or otherwise) of the 
parent company, and including the executives in the Parent and the Group receiving the highest remuneration. 
For the purposes of this report, the term “executive” includes a chief executive officer (CEO), executive Directors, 
senior management and company secretaries of the Parent. 
A. 
Individual key management personnel disclosures 
Details of KMP including the top five remunerated executives of the Parent and Group are set out below: 
Key management personnel 
(i) Directors 
A Bantock 
M Hill 
N Chen 
(ii) Executives 
S McBride 
Non-executive chairman 
Managing director and CEO 
Non-executive director 
Chief Financial Officer and Company Secretary 
B.  Principles used to determine the nature and amount of remuneration 
The objective of the Company's reward framework is to set aggregate remuneration at a level which provides the 
Company with the ability to attract and retain directors and executives of the highest calibre whilst maintaining a cost 
which is acceptable to shareholders. 
Non-executive Directors 
Fees and payments to non-executive Directors reflect the demands which are made on, and the responsibilities of, 
the Directors.  Non-executive Directors' fees and payments are reviewed by the Board.  The Chairman's fees are 
determined independently to the fees of non-executive Directors based on comparative roles in the external market.  
The Chairman is not present at any discussions relating to determination of his remuneration. 
Directors’ fees 
Directors' fees are determined within an aggregate Directors' fee pool limit, which is periodically recommended for 
approval by shareholders. The maximum currently stands at $300,000 in aggregate.  This amount is separate from 
any specific tasks the Directors may take on for the Company in the normal course of business, which are charged 
at normal commercial rates. 
Fees  for  Directors  are  not  linked  to  the  performance  of  the  Group  however,  to  align  all  Directors’  interests  with 
shareholders’  interests;  Directors  are  encouraged  to  hold  shares in the  Company and  may  receive  options.   This 
effectively links Directors’ performance to the share price performance and therefore to the interests of shareholders.  
There  have  been  no  performance  conditions  imposed  prior  to  the  grant  of  options  which  act  as  an  incentive  to 
increase the value for all shareholders. 
Executive remuneration 
The Company aims to reward Executives with a level and mix of remuneration commensurate with their position and 
responsibilities within the Company and so as to: 
  Reward executives for Company performance; 
  Align the interests of executives with those of shareholders; and 
  Ensure total remuneration is competitive by market standards. 
Fixed  remuneration  is  reviewed  annually  or  upon  renewal  of  fixed  term  contracts  by  the  Board  and  the  process 
consists of a review of Company and individual performance, relevant comparative remuneration in the market and 
23 
 
 
Remuneration Report – Audited 
internal policies and practices. Executives are given the opportunity to receive their fixed remuneration in a variety of 
forms including cash and fringe benefits.  It is intended that the manner of payment chosen will be optimal for the 
recipient without creating undue cost for the Company. 
The objective of variable remuneration  provided is to reward executives in a manner which  aligns this element of 
remuneration with the creation of shareholder wealth.  Variable remuneration may be delivered in the form of share 
options  granted  with  or  without  vesting  conditions  and/or  employee  performance  shares  granted  subject  to  the 
successful completion, within an appropriate timeframe, of various key tasks. 
C.  Executive contractual arrangements 
M Hill – Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer 
A formal written service agreement is in place. Details of Mr Hill’s employment agreement are: 
  Base salary, exclusive of superannuation, effective 1 May 2012 is $260,000 per annum, reviewable on an 
annual basis. 
  Payment of a termination benefit on early termination by the Company, other than for grave misconduct or 
long-term incapacity, equal to three (3) months’ salary. 
S McBride – Chief Financial Officer/Company Secretary 
Effective 15 March 2020, Mr McBride’s remuneration is based on a fixed monthly retainer of $15,000 for 3 days per 
week, with a 2-month notice period for either party. 
D.  Remuneration of Key Management Personnel (“KMP”) 
Fees & 
Consulting 
Paid 
Super-
annuation 
Paid 
Fees & 
Consulting 
Accrued 
Super-
annuation 
Accrued 
Share-
based 
Payments 
30-Jun-2020 
Directors 
M Hill 
A Bantock * 
N Chen * 
260,000 
24,700 
41,096 
30,822 
3,904 
2,928 
Total Directors 
331,918 
31,532 
Other KMP 
S McBride 
Total executive KMP 
Totals 
247,877 
247,877 
579,795 
22,123 
22,123 
53,655 
Total 
365,395 
65,804 
54,554 
80,695 
20,804 
20,804 
122,303 
485,753 
% of 
Equity 
Based 
Payments
22.08% 
31.62% 
38.13% 
25.18% 
41,608 
41,608 
311,608 
311,608 
13.35% 
13.35% 
163,911 
797,361 
20.56% 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
* Note: Messrs Bantock and Chen agreed to forego their entitlement to director fees for three months from 1 April 
2020 to 30 June 2020, as a result of the uncertain impact on the Company’s operations and capital markets, as a 
consequence of government imposed restrictions to combat COVID-19 . 
24 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Remuneration Report – Audited 
30-Jun-2019 
Directors 
M Hill 
A Bantock 
D Buerger1 
N Chen 
260,000 
57,680 
3,750 
41,096 
24,700 
2,820 
- 
3,904 
Total Directors 
362,526 
31,424 
Other KMP 
S McBride 
Total executive KMP 
Totals 
1 Retired on 31 July 2018. 
168,138 
168,138 
530,664 
15,617 
15,617 
47,041 
Fees & 
Consulting 
Paid 
Super-
annuation 
Paid 
Fees & 
Consulting 
Accrued 
Super-
annuation 
Accrued 
Share-
based 
Payments 
Total 
368,409 
82,146 
3,750 
66,646 
83,709 
21,646 
- 
21,646 
127,001 
520,951 
% of 
Equity 
Based 
Payments 
22.72% 
26.35% 
-% 
32.48% 
24.38% 
43,292 
43,292 
227,047 
227,047 
19.07% 
19.07% 
170,293 
747,998 
22.77% 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
E.  Value of options issued, exercised and expired during the year 
Details of vesting profile of options vested or expired during the year and those options unexercised at reporting date 
granted as remuneration to current key management personnel of the Company are detailed below: 
Year ended 30 June 2020 
During the 2020 financial year, the following options lapsed: 
Expiry Date 
Exercise Price 
Number under Option 
- 
- 
- 
The following options were exercised during the year: 
Expiry Date 
Exercise Price 
Number under Option 
1 December 2019 
$0.1806 
290,698 
The following options were issued during the year: 
Expiry Date 
Exercise Price 
Number under Option 
28 November 2023 
$0.17 
7,600,000 
These options were fair valued at $0.036867 using the Black Scholes option pricing model. 
Year ended 30 June 2019 
During the 2019 financial year, the following options lapsed: 
Expiry Date 
Exercise Price 
Number under Option 
26 November 2018 
$0.355 
320,338 
The following options were issued during the year: 
Expiry Date 
Exercise Price 
Number under Option 
13 December 2020 
$0.17 
7,600,000 
These options were fair valued at $0.021546 using the Black Scholes option pricing model. 
25 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Remuneration Report – Audited 
F.  Shareholdings for Key Management Personnel 
30 June 2020 
Directors 
M Hill 
N Chen 
A Bantock 
Other KMP: 
S McBride 
30 June 2019 
Directors 
M Hill 
D Buerger 1 
N Chen 
A Bantock 
Other KMP: 
S McBride 
1 Retired 31 July 2018 
Balance at 
1 July 2019 
Purchased/ 
(Sold) during 
the year 
Granted as 
remuneration 
Balance at 
30 June 
2020 
2,542,858 
1,331,707 
200,000 
1,421,053 
1,315,789 
657,895 
70,000 
782,895 
4,144,565 
4,177,632 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
3,963,911 
2,647,496 
857,895 
852,895 
8,322,197 
Balance at 
1 July 2018 
Purchased/ 
(Sold) during 
the year 
Granted as 
remuneration 
Balance at 
30 June 
2019 
2,467,147 
1,245,242 
1,331,707 
200,000 
18,300 
5,262,396 
75,711 
- 
- 
- 
51,700 
127,411 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
2,542,858 
1,245,242 
1,331,707 
200,000 
70,000 
5,389,807 
G.  Option holdings for Key Management Personnel 
30 June 2020 
Balance at 
1 July 2019 
Exercised 
Lapsed 
Issued 
Balance at 
30 June 2020 
Total 
Exercisable 
Not 
exercisable 
Vested at 30 June 2020 
Directors 
M Hill 
N Chen 
A Bantock 
Other KMP 
3,600,000 
1,292,857 
1,100,000 
S McBride 
2,207,948 
8,200,805 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
3,600,000 
7,200,000 
7,200,000 
3,600,000 
3,600,000 
(150,000) 
1,000,000 
2,142,657 
2,142,657 
1,142,657 
1,000,000 
(100,000) 
1,000,000 
2,000,000 
2,000,000 
1,000,000 
1,000,000 
- 
2,000,000 
4,207,948 
4,207,948 
2,207,948 
2,000,000 
(250,000) 
7,600,000 
15,550,605 
15,550,605 
7,950,605 
7,600,000 
In regard to 142,857 of the Directors options above, the Company will fund the exercise price in the event of exercise. 
26 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Remuneration Report – Audited 
30 June 2019 
Balance at 
1 July 2018 
Exercised 
Issued 
Balance at 
30 June 2019 
Total 
Exercisable 
Not 
exercisable 
Vested at 30 June 2019 
Directors 
M Hill 
N Chen 
A Bantock 
Other KMP 
S McBride 
- 
292,857 
100,000 
207,948 
600,805 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
3,600,000 
3,600,000 
3,600,000 
3,600,000 
1,000,000 
1,292,857 
1,292,857 
1,292,857 
1,000,000 
1,100,000 
1,100,000 
1,100,000 
2,000,000 
2,207,948 
2,207,948 
2,207,948 
7,600,000 
8,200,805 
8,200,805 
8,200,805 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
In regard to 142,857 of the Directors options above, the Company will fund the exercise price in the event of exercise. 
H.  Performance Rights for Key Management Personnel 
30 June 2020 
Directors 
M Hill 
A Bantock 
N Chen 
Other KMP 
S McBride 
Balance at 
1 July 2019 
Issued 
Vested 
Balance at 
30 June 2020 
Total 
Unvested 
202,500 
- 
- 
- 
202,500 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
202,500 
202,500 
202,500 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
202,500 
202,500 
202,500 
On 14 July 2016, the Company issued Mr Hill 675,000 performance rights with the following hurdles: 
  270,000 – successful raising of capital for pilot plant construction and operation 
  202,500 – successful completion of the initial pilot plant programme proving U-pgradeTM works on samples 
tested 
  202,500 – first commercialisation deal on U-pgradeTM  
Any unvested performance rights will automatically vest on the occurrence of any of the following events: 
 
the sale by Uranium Beneficiation Pty Ltd of the Intellectual Property comprising the U-pgradeTM process. 
 
the sale by Marenica of all of its shares in Uranium Beneficiation Pty Ltd. 
  A  change  of  control  in  Marenica  by  virtue  of  any  person  or  entity  obtaining  a  relevant  interest  within  the 
meaning of the Corporations Act in more than 50% of the voting shares in Marenica. 
In the event of Mr Hill ceasing to be an employee of Marenica or a subsidiary of Marenica, any unvested performance 
rights will lapse unless the Board of Marenica otherwise determines, at its discretion, that all or any of the unvested 
performance rights shall vest. In any case, the performance rights lapse on 14 July 2023, if they are not vested. 
Following the signing of the Technology Licence Agreement with Deep Yellow Limited in 2016, including at the time, 
advice  of  its  intention to  fund  a  pilot plant  to  demonstrate the  U-pgradeTM technology on  a continuous  basis,  the 
Board  determined  that  the  first  and  third  milestones noted  above  were  achieved and  472,500  performance rights 
vested on 30 September 2016. 
27 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
28 
30 September 2020 
Chairman 
Andrew Bantock  
Signed in accordance with a resolution of the Directors. 
End of Remuneration Report 
Remuneration Report – Audited 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss and 
Other Comprehensive Income 
For the year ended 30 June 2020 
Continuing operations 
Revenue 
Interest received 
Research and development tax refund 
Government cash flow boosts 
Other income 
Expenses 
Exploration and evaluation expenses 
Share based employee benefits 
Employee benefit expense 
Foreign exchange loss 
Administration expenses 
Depreciation expense 
Finance expense 
Total expenses 
Loss before income tax expense 
Income tax (expense)/benefit 
Net loss for the year 
Other comprehensive income 
Total comprehensive loss for the year 
Loss for the year is attributable to: 
Owners of Marenica Energy Limited 
Non-controlling interests 
Total comprehensive loss for the year is attributable to: 
Owners of Marenica Energy Limited 
Non-controlling interests 
Note 
2020 
$ 
2019 
$ 
4 
4 
4 
4 
5 
5 
5 
6 
5,740 
106,362 
100,000 
22,208 
234,310 
14,703 
101,654 
- 
18,336 
134,693 
(503,541) 
(163,911) 
(691,501) 
(21,355) 
(463,751) 
(46,003) 
(2,853) 
(1,892,915) 
(1,658,605) 
- 
(1,658,605) 
- 
(1,658,605) 
(220,574) 
(170,293) 
(562,543) 
(10,419) 
(390,302) 
(4,317) 
(73,106) 
(1,431,554) 
(1,296,861) 
- 
(1,296,861) 
- 
(1,296,861) 
(1,658,605) 
- 
(1,658,605) 
(1,296,861) 
- 
(1,296,861) 
(1,658,605) 
- 
(1,658,605) 
(1,296,861) 
- 
(1,296,861) 
Earnings per share 
Basic loss per share (cents per share) 
21 
(1.61) 
(1.89) 
Diluted losses per share are not disclosed as they are not materially different to basic losses per share. 
The Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income should be read in conjunction with the 
notes to the Financial Statements. 
29 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position 
As at 30 June 2020 
ASSETS 
Current Assets 
Cash and cash equivalents 
Trade and other receivables 
Total Current Assets 
Non-Current Assets 
Plant & equipment 
Trade and other receivables 
Right-of-use asset 
Tenement acquisition cost 
Total Non-Current Assets 
TOTAL ASSETS 
LIABILITIES 
Current Liabilities 
Trade and other payables 
Lease liability 
Employee benefits 
Total Current Liabilities 
Non-Current Liabilities 
Lease liability 
Employee benefits 
Total Non-Current Liabilities 
TOTAL LIABILITIES 
NET ASSETS 
EQUITY 
Contributed equity 
Reserves 
Accumulated losses 
Note 
2020 
$ 
2019 
$ 
19 
7 
8 
7 
9 
10 
11 
12 
12 
1,062,967 
65,910 
1,128,877 
20,248 
- 
64,247 
3,145,885 
3,230,380 
4,359,257 
227,768 
22,718 
103,318 
353,804 
42,520 
38,674 
81,194 
434,998 
3,924,259 
487,862 
286,956 
774,818 
20,886 
3,360 
- 
- 
24,246 
799,064 
170,276 
- 
91,053 
261,329 
- 
33,985 
33,985 
295,314 
503,750 
13 
14 
15 
55,929,259 
485,191 
(52,490,191) 
51,030,575 
409,674 
(50,936,499) 
TOTAL CAPITAL AND RESERVES ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE OWNERS 
OF MARENICA ENERGY LIMITED 
Non-controlling interests 
TOTAL EQUITY 
3,924,259 
- 
3,924,259 
503,750 
- 
503,750 
The Consolidated Statement of Financial Position should be read in conjunction with the notes to the Financial Statements. 
30 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity 
For the year ended 30 June 2020 
30 June 2020 
Notes 
Issued 
Capital 
Accumulated 
Losses 
Reserves 
Total 
Non- 
Controlling 
Interests 
Total 
Equity 
Balance at beginning of year 
51,030,575 
(50,936,499) 
409,674 
503,750 
Adjustment for change in 
accounting policy 
Balance at beginning of year 
– restated 
Loss for the year 
Other comprehensive 
income 
Total comprehensive loss 
for the year 
Transactions with owners in 
their capacity as owners: 
Issue of shares 
Share issue costs 
Transfer on exercise or 
expiry of equity 
Options issued during year 
Options lapsed during year 
Performance Rights vesting 
2 
15 
- 
(827) 
51,030,575 
(50,937,326) 
- 
- 
- 
(1,658,605) 
- 
(1,658,605) 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
(827) 
502,923 
(1,658,605) 
- 
(1,658,605) 
5,157,542 
(290,283) 
(31,105) 
- 
206,563 
206,883 
105,740 
(105,740) 
- 
- 
5,799 
5,799 
5,157,542 
(290,283) 
13, 14 
31,105 
14 
14 
14 
320 
- 
- 
Balance at end of year 
55,929,259 
(52,490,191) 
485,191 
3,924,259 
30 June 2019 
Notes 
Issued 
Capital 
Accumulated 
Losses 
Reserves 
Total 
Non- 
Controlling 
Interests 
Total 
Equity 
Balance at beginning of year 
48,072,158 
(49,702,722) 
423,299 
(1,207,265) 
- 
- 
- 
(1,296,861) 
- 
(1,296,861) 
Loss for the year 
14 
Other comprehensive 
income 
Total comprehensive loss 
for the year 
Transactions with owners in 
their capacity as owners: 
Issue of shares 
Share issue costs 
Transfer on exercise or 
expiry of equity 
1,178,000 
(153,228) 
12, 13 
1,933,445 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
(1,296,861) 
- 
(1,296,861) 
1,178,000 
(153,228) 
(163,926) 
1,769,519 
207,602 
207,802 
Options issued during year 
Options lapsed during year 
Performance Rights vesting 
13 
13 
13 
200 
- 
- 
63,084 
(63,084) 
- 
- 
5,783 
5,783 
Balance at end of year 
51,030,575 
(50,936,499) 
409,674 
503,750 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
503,750 
(827) 
502,923 
(1,658,605) 
- 
(1,658,605) 
5,157,542 
(290,283) 
- 
206,883 
- 
5,799 
3,924,259 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
(1,207,265) 
(1,296,861) 
- 
(1,296,861) 
1,178,000 
(153,228) 
1,769,519 
207,802 
- 
5,783 
503,750 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
The Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity should be read in conjunction with the notes to the Financial Statements. 
31 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 
For the year ended 30 June 2020 
Cash flows from operating activities 
Payments to suppliers and employees 
Research and development refund received 
Government cash flow boosts received 
Interest received 
Interest paid 
Net cash outflow from operating activities 
Cash flows from investing activities 
Purchase of plant and equipment 
Payments for tenement acquisition cost 
Investments in subsidiaries 
Loans to other entities 
Cash generated / (used) in investing activities 
Cash flows from financing activities 
Proceeds from issue of equity securities 
Expenses from issue of equity securities 
Repayment of lease liabilities 
Cash generated / (used) in financing activities 
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the financial year 
Effects of foreign exchange changes on cash and cash equivalents 
Cash at the end of the financial year 
   19 
Note 
2020 
$ 
2019 
$ 
(1,614,187) 
106,362 
50,000 
5,741 
- 
(1,452,084) 
 (1,255,312) 
101,654 
- 
14,703 
(13,205) 
(1,152,160) 
   20 
(4,103) 
(298,151) 
- 
- 
(302,254) 
(11,869) 
- 
(672) 
(250,000) 
(262,541) 
2,602,872 
(229,688) 
(44,278) 
2,328,906 
574,568 
487,862 
537 
1,062,967 
1,178,200 
 (123,564) 
- 
1,054,636 
(360,065) 
847,922 
5 
487,862 
The Consolidated Statement of Cash flows should be read in conjunction with the notes to the Financial Statements. 
32 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements 
For the year ended 30 June 2020 
1. 
CORPORATE INFORMATION 
The financial statements of Marenica Energy Limited (the “Company”) for the year ended 30 June 2020 were 
authorised for issue in accordance with a resolution of the Directors on 30 September 2020. 
Marenica Energy Limited is a company limited by shares incorporated in Australia whose shares are publicly 
traded on the Australian Stock Exchange and the Namibia Stock Exchange. 
The nature  of  operations and  principal  activities  of the  Group, comprising  Marenica  Energy Limited  and its 
subsidiaries, (“Group”) are described in the Directors’ Report. 
2. 
STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES 
The  principal  accounting  policies  adopted  in  the  preparation  of  the  financial  statements  are  set  out  below. 
These policies have been consistently applied to all the years presented, unless otherwise stated. 
(a)  Basis of preparation 
These general purpose financial statements  have been prepared in accordance with  Australian Accounting 
Standards  and  Interpretations  issued  by  the  Australian  Accounting  Standards  Board  (‘AASB’)  and  the 
Corporations Act 2001, as appropriate for for-profit oriented entities. These financial statements also comply 
with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board 
(‘IASB’). 
Historical cost convention 
These  financial  statements  have  been  prepared  under  the  historical  cost  convention,  as  modified  by  the 
revaluation  of  available-for-sale  financial  assets,  financial  assets  and  liabilities  (including  derivative 
instruments) at fair value through profit or loss, certain classes of property, plant and equipment and investment 
property. 
Critical Accounting Estimates 
The preparation of financial statements requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires 
management to exercise its judgement in the process of applying the Group’s accounting policies. The areas 
involving  a  higher  degree  of  judgement  or  complexity,  or  areas  where  assumptions  and  estimates  are 
significant to the financial statements are disclosed in Note 3. 
Functional and Presentation Currency 
These  consolidated  financial  statements  are  presented  in  Australian  dollars,  which  are  the  Company’s 
functional currency and the functional currency of the majority of the Group’s current financial transactions. 
(b)  Going Concern 
The Group incurred losses of $1,658,605 (2019: $1,296,861) and net operating cash outflows of $1,452,084 
(2019:  $1,152,160).  These  were  offset  by  net  cash  inflows  from  financing  activities  of  $2,328,906 
(2019:$1,054,636). 
The Group’s ability to continue as a going concern and meet its debts and future commitments as and when 
they fall due, is dependent on a number of factors, including: 
 
the ability of the Group to obtain financing through equity, debt or hybrid financing, joint ventures or 
other financing arrangements  
 
the ability of the Group to sell assets as required. 
The financial report has been prepared on a going concern basis. In arriving at this position, the Directors have 
had regard to the fact that the Company has, or in the Directors’ opinion will have access to, sufficient cash to 
fund administrative and other committed expenditure for a period of not less than 12 months from the date of 
this report.  
Should the Company not achieve the matters set out above, there is significant uncertainty whether it will be 
able to continue as a going concern and therefore whether it will be able to pay its debts as and when they fall 
due and realise its assets and extinguish its liabilities in the normal course of business and at the amounts 
stated in the financial statements. 
33 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued) 
For the year ended 30 June 2020 
2 
STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) 
(c) 
Principles of consolidation 
The  consolidated  financial  statements  incorporate  the  assets  and  liabilities  of  all  subsidiaries  of  Marenica 
Energy Limited (“Company” or “parent entity”) as at 30 June 2020 and the results of all subsidiaries for the 
year  then  ended.  Marenica  Energy  Limited  and  its  subsidiaries  together  are  referred  to  in  these  financial 
statements as the Group. 
Subsidiaries are all entities over which the Group has control. The Group controls an entity when the Group is 
exposed to, or has rights to, variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect 
those returns through its power to direct the activities of the entity. 
Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Group. They are de- 
consolidated from the date that control ceases. 
The financial statements of subsidiaries are prepared for the same reporting period as the parent entity, using 
consistent accounting policies. The effects of all intercompany transactions, balances and unrealised gains on 
transactions between entities in the Group are eliminated in full. 
The  acquisition  of  subsidiaries  is  accounted  for  using  the  acquisition  method  of  accounting.  A  change  in 
ownership  interest,  without  loss  of  control,  is  accounted  for  as  an  equity  transaction,  where  the  difference 
between the consideration transferred and the book value of the share of the non-controlling interest acquired 
is recognised directly in equity attributable to the parent entity. 
Non-controlling interest in the results and equity of subsidiaries are shown separately in the statement of profit 
or loss and other comprehensive income, statement of financial position and statement of changes in equity 
of the Group.  Losses incurred by the Group are attributed to the non-controlling interest in full, even  if that 
results in a deficit balance. 
Where the Group loses control over a subsidiary, it derecognises the assets including goodwill (if any), liabilities 
and non-controlling interest in the subsidiary together with any cumulative translation differences recognised 
in equity. The Group recognises the fair value of the consideration received and the fair value of any investment 
retained together with any gain or loss in profit or loss. 
(d)  Current and non-current classification 
Assets and liabilities are  presented in  the  statement  of financial position  based  on  current  and non-current 
classification. 
An asset is classified as current when: it is either expected to be realised or intended to be sold or consumed 
in normal operating cycle; it is held primarily for the purpose of trading; it is expected to be realised within 12 
months  after  the  reporting  period;  or  the  asset  is  cash  or  cash  equivalent  unless  restricted  from  being 
exchanged or used to settle a liability for at least 12 months after the reporting period. All other assets are 
classified as non-current. 
A liability is classified as current when: it is either expected to be settled in normal operating cycle; it is held 
primarily for the purpose of trading; it is due to be settled within 12 months after the reporting period; or there 
is no unconditional right to defer the settlement of the liability for at least 12 months after the reporting period. 
All other liabilities are classified as non-current. 
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are always classified as non-current. 
(e) 
Exploration expenses 
Exploration and evaluation costs represent intangible assets. Exploration, evaluation and development costs 
are expensed as incurred. Acquisition costs related to an area of interest are capitalised and carried forward 
to the extent that they are expected to be recouped through the successful development of the area or where 
activities in the area have not yet reached a stage which permits reasonable assessment of the existence of 
economically  recoverable  reserves  and  active  and  significant  operations  in,  or  in  relation  to,  the  areas  of 
interest are continuing. 
Costs of site restoration are provided over the life of the facility from when exploration commences and are 
included in the costs of that stage. Site restoration costs include the dismantling and removal of mining plant, 
equipment and building structures, waste removal, and rehabilitation of the site in accordance with clauses of 
the  mining  permits.  Such  costs  have  been  determined  using  estimates  of  future  costs,  current  legal 
requirements and technology on an undiscounted basis. 
34 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued) 
For the year ended 30 June 2020 
2 
STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) 
Any changes in the estimates for the costs are accounted on a prospective basis. In determining the costs of 
site  restoration,  there  is  uncertainty  regarding  the  nature  and  extent  of  the  restoration  due  to  community 
expectations  and  future  legislation.  Accordingly,  the  costs  have  been  determined  on  the  basis  that  the 
restoration will be completed. 
(f) 
Cash and cash equivalents 
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, deposits held at call with financial institutions, other short- 
term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less that are readily convertible to 
known amounts of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value. 
(g) 
Trade and other receivables 
Trade receivables are initially recognised at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost using the 
effective interest method, less any provision for impairment. Trade receivables are generally due for settlement 
within 30 days. 
Other receivables are recognised at amortised cost, less any provision for impairment 
(h) 
Plant and equipment 
Plant and equipment is stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment. Historical cost 
includes expenditure that is directly attributable to the acquisition of the items. 
Depreciation  is  calculated  on  a  straight  line  basis  so  as  to  write  off  the  net  cost  of  each  asset  during  their 
expected useful life of 3 to 5 years. 
An item of plant and equipment is derecognised upon disposal or when there is no future economic benefit to 
the Group. Gains and losses between the carrying amount and the disposal proceeds are taken to profit or 
loss. 
(i) 
Right-of-use assets 
A right-of-use asset is recognised at the commencement date of a lease. The right-of-use asset is measured 
at cost, which comprises the initial amount of the lease liability, adjusted for, as applicable, any lease payments 
made  at  or  before  the  commencement  date  net  of  any  lease  incentives  received,  any  initial  direct  costs 
incurred, and, except where included in the cost of inventories, an estimate of costs expected to be incurred 
for dismantling and removing the underlying asset, and restoring the site or asset. 
Right-of-use  assets  are  depreciated  on  a  straight-line  basis  over  the  unexpired  period  of  the  lease  or  the 
estimated useful life of the asset, whichever is the shorter. Where the consolidated entity expects to obtain 
ownership of the leased asset at the end of the lease term, the depreciation is over its estimated useful life. 
Right-of use assets are subject to impairment or adjusted for any remeasurement of lease liabilities. 
The consolidated entity has elected not to recognise a right-of-use asset and corresponding lease liability for 
short-term leases with terms of 12 months or less and leases of low-value assets. Lease payments on these 
assets are expensed to profit or loss as incurred. 
(j) 
Investments and other financial assets 
Investments and other financial assets are initially measured at fair value. Transaction costs are included as 
part of the initial measurement, except for financial assets at fair value through profit or loss. Such assets are 
subsequently measured at either amortised cost or fair value depending on their classification. Classification 
is determined based on both the business model within which such assets are held and the contractual cash 
flow characteristics of the financial asset unless, an accounting mismatch is being avoided. 
Financial assets are derecognised when the rights to receive cash flows have expired or have been transferred 
and  the  Group  has  transferred  substantially  all  the  risks  and  rewards  of  ownership.  When  there  is  no 
reasonable expectation of recovering part or all of a financial asset, its carrying value is written off. 
Financial assets at fair value through profit and loss 
Financial  assets  not  measured  at  amortised  cost  or  at  fair  value  through  other  comprehensive  income  are 
classified as financial assets at fair value through profit or loss. Typically, such financial assets will be either: 
(i) held for trading, where  they are acquired for the purpose  of selling  in the short-term with an intention of 
making a profit, or a derivative; or (ii) designated as such upon initial recognition where permitted. Fair value 
movements are recognised in profit or loss. 
35 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued) 
For the year ended 30 June 2020 
2 
STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) 
Financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income 
Financial  assets  at  fair  value  through  other  comprehensive  income  include  equity  investments  which  the 
consolidated entity intends to hold for the foreseeable future and has irrevocably elected to classify them as 
such upon initial recognition. 
Impairment of financial assets 
The  Group  recognises  a  loss  allowance  for  expected  credit  losses  on  financial  assets  which  are  either 
measured at amortised cost or fair value through other comprehensive income. The measurement of the loss 
allowance  depends  upon  the  consolidated  entity's  assessment  at  the  end  of  each  reporting  period  as  to 
whether  the  financial  instrument's  credit  risk  has  increased  significantly  since  initial  recognition,  based  on 
reasonable and supportable information that is available, without undue cost or effort to obtain. 
Where there has not been a significant increase in exposure to credit risk since initial recognition, a 12-month 
expected credit loss allowance is estimated. This represents a portion of the asset's lifetime expected credit 
losses that is attributable to a default event that is possible within the next 12 months. Where a financial asset 
has  become  credit  impaired  or  where  it  is  determined  that  credit  risk  has  increased  significantly,  the  loss 
allowance  is  based  on  the  asset's  lifetime  expected  credit  losses.  The  amount  of  expected  credit  loss 
recognised is measured on the basis of the probability weighted present value of anticipated cash shortfalls 
over the life of the instrument discounted at the original effective interest rate. 
For  financial  assets  measured  at  fair  value  through  other  comprehensive  income,  the  loss  allowance  is 
recognised within other comprehensive income. In all other cases, the loss allowance is recognised in profit or 
loss. 
(k) 
Lease liabilities 
A lease liability is recognised at the commencement date of a lease. The lease liability is initially recognised at 
the present value of the lease payments to be made over the term of the lease, discounted using the interest 
rate  implicit  in  the  lease  or,  if  that  rate  cannot  be  readily  determined,  the  consolidated  entity's  incremental 
borrowing  rate.  Lease payments comprise  of  fixed payments  less any lease  incentives receivable,  variable 
lease  payments  that  depend  on  an  index  or  a  rate,  amounts  expected  to  be  paid  under  residual  value 
guarantees, exercise price of a purchase option when the exercise of the option is reasonably certain to occur, 
and any anticipated termination penalties. The variable lease payments that do not depend on an index or a 
rate are expensed in the period in which they are incurred. 
Lease liabilities are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method. The carrying amounts are 
remeasured if there is a change in the following: future lease payments arising from a change in an index or a 
rate used; residual guarantee; lease term; certainty of a purchase option and termination penalties. When a 
lease liability is remeasured, an adjustment is made to the corresponding right-of use asset, or to profit or loss 
if the carrying amount of the right-of-use asset is fully written down. 
(l) 
Provisions and employee benefits 
Provisions 
Provisions are recognised when the Group has a present (legal or constructive) obligation as a result of a past 
event, it is probable the Group will be required to settle the obligation, and a reliable estimate can be made of 
the amount of the obligation. The amount recognised as a provision is the best estimate of the consideration 
required to settle the present obligation at the reporting date, taking into account the risks and uncertainties 
surrounding the obligation. If the time value of money is material, provisions are discounted using a current 
pre-tax  rate  specific  to  the  liability.  The  increase  in  the  provision  resulting  from  the  passage  of  time  is 
recognised as a finance cost. 
Short-term employee benefits 
Liabilities  for  wages  and  salaries,  including  non-monetary  benefits,  annual  leave  and  long  service  leave 
expected to be settled wholly within 12 months of the reporting date are measured at the amounts expected 
to be paid when the liabilities are settled. 
36 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued) 
For the year ended 30 June 2020 
2 
STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) 
Other long-term employee benefits 
The liability for annual leave and long service leave not expected to be settled within 12 months of the reporting 
date are measured at the present value of expected future payments to be made in respect of services provided 
by  employees  up  to  the  reporting  date.  Consideration  is  given  to  expected  future  wage  and  salary  levels, 
experience of employee departures and periods of service. Expected future payments are discounted using 
market  yields  at  the  reporting  date  on  corporate  bonds  with  terms  to  maturity  and  currency  that  match,  as 
closely as possible, the estimated future cash outflows. 
Defined contribution superannuation expense 
Contributions  to  defined  contribution  superannuation  plans  are  expensed  in  the  period  in  which  they  are 
incurred. 
(m)  Share based payments 
The Company provides benefits to Directors, employees, consultants and other advisors of the Company in 
the form of share-based payments, whereby the directors, employees, consultants and other advisors render 
services in exchange for shares or rights over shares (equity-settled transactions). 
The  cost  of  these  equity-settled  transactions  is  measured  by  reference  to  the  fair  value  of  the  equity 
instruments at the date at which they are granted. The fair value is independently determined using the Black- 
Scholes option pricing model that takes into account the exercise price, the term of the option, the impact of 
dilution, the share price at grant date and expected volatility of the underlying share, the expected dividend 
yield and the risk free interest rate for the term of the option, together with non-vesting conditions that do not 
determine whether the Group receives the services that entitle the employees to receive payment. 
In valuing equity-settled transactions, no account is taken of any performance conditions, other than conditions 
linked to the market price of the shares of the Company, if applicable. 
The cost of equity-settled transactions is recognised as an expense with a corresponding increase in equity, 
over the period in which the performance and/or service conditions are fulfilled, ending on the date on which 
the relevant recipient becomes fully entitled to the award (the vesting period). 
The cumulative expense recognised for equity-settled  transactions at each reporting date  until vesting date 
reflects: 
(i) 
the extent to which the vesting period has expired and 
(ii)  the Company’s best estimate of the number of equity instruments that will ultimately vest. 
No adjustment is made for the likelihood of market performance conditions being met as the effect of these 
conditions is included in the determination of fair value at grant date. The income statement charge or credit 
for a period represents the movement in cumulative expense recognised as at the beginning and end of that 
period. 
No  expense  is  recognised  for  awards  that  do  not  ultimately  vest,  except  for  awards  where  vesting  is  only 
conditional upon a market condition. 
If the terms of an equity-settled award are modified, as a minimum, an expense is recognised as if the terms 
had not been modified. In addition, an expense is recognised for any modification that increases the total fair 
value of the share-based payment arrangement, or is otherwise beneficial to the recipient, as measured at the 
date of modification. 
If an equity-settled award  is  cancelled, it is treated as if  it  had vested  on  the date  of cancellation,  and  any 
expense not yet recognised for the award is recognised immediately. However, if a new award is substituted 
for the cancelled award and designated as a replacement award on the date that it is granted, the cancelled 
and new award are treated as if they were a modification of the original award, as described in the previous 
paragraph. 
(n) 
Earnings per share 
Basic  earnings  per  share  is  determined  by  dividing  the  profit  (loss)  after  income  tax  attributable  to  equity 
holders of the Company by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the year. 
37 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued) 
For the year ended 30 June 2020 
2 
STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) 
(o) 
Fair value measurement 
When  an  asset  or  liability,  financial  or  non-financial,  is  measured  at  fair  value  for  recognition  or  disclosure 
purposes, the fair value  is  based on the  price that would be received to sell  an  asset or  paid to transfer a 
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date; and assumes that the 
transaction will take place either: in the principal market; or in the absence of a principal market, in the most 
advantageous market. 
Fair value is measured using the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or 
liability,  assuming  they  act  in  their  economic  best  interests.  For  non-financial  assets,  the  fair  value 
measurement  is  based  on  its  highest  and  best  use.  Valuation  techniques  that  are  appropriate  in  the 
circumstances and for which sufficient data are available to measure fair value, are used, maximising the use 
of relevant observable inputs and minimising the use of unobservable inputs. Assets and liabilities measured 
at fair value  are classified, into three  levels, using a fair value hierarchy that reflects the significance of the 
inputs used in making the measurements. Classifications are reviewed at each reporting date and transfers 
between levels are determined based on a reassessment of the lowest level of input that is significant to the 
fair value measurement. For recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements, external valuers may be 
used when internal expertise is either not available or when the valuation is deemed to be significant. External 
valuers are selected based on market knowledge and reputation. Where there is a significant change in fair 
value of an asset or liability from one period to another, an analysis is undertaken, which includes a verification 
of the major inputs applied in the latest valuation and a comparison, where applicable, with external sources 
of data. 
(p) 
Impairment of non-financial assets 
Non-financial assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that 
the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognised for the amount by which the 
asset's carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. 
(q) 
Trade and Other Payables 
Trade payables and other accounts payable are recognised when the Group becomes obliged to make future 
payments resulting from the purchase of goods and services. 
(r) 
Borrowings 
Loans and borrowings are initially recognised at the fair value of the consideration received, net of transaction 
costs. They are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method. 
The component of the convertible notes that exhibits characteristics of a liability is recognised as a liability in 
the statement of financial position, net of transaction costs. 
On the issue of the convertible notes the fair value of the liability component is determined using a market rate 
for an equivalent non-convertible bond and this amount is carried as a non-current liability on the amortised 
cost basis until extinguished on conversion or redemption. The increase in the liability due to the passage of 
time is recognised as a finance cost. The remainder of the proceeds are allocated to the conversion option 
that is recognised and included in shareholders equity as a convertible note reserve, net of transaction costs. 
The carrying amount of the conversion option is not remeasured in the subsequent years. The corresponding 
interest on convertible notes is expensed to profit or loss. 
(s) 
Issued capital 
Ordinary shares are classified as equity. 
Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options are shown in equity as a deduction, 
net of tax, from the proceeds. 
38 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued) 
For the year ended 30 June 2020 
2 
STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) 
(t) 
Revenue recognition 
The Group recognises revenue as follows: 
Revenue from contracts with customers 
Revenue  is  recognised  at  an  amount  that  reflects  the  consideration  to  which  the  Group  is  expected  to  be 
entitled in exchange for transferring goods or services to a customer. For each contract with a customer, the 
Group:  identifies  the  contract  with  a  customer;  identifies  the  performance  obligations  in  the  contract; 
determines the  transaction price  which  takes into  account  estimates  of  variable  consideration  and  the  time 
value of money; allocates the transaction price to the  separate performance obligations on the basis of the 
relative stand-alone selling price of each distinct good or service to be delivered; and recognises revenue when 
or  as  each  performance  obligation  is  satisfied  in  a  manner  that  depicts  the  transfer  to  the  customer  of  the 
goods or services promised. 
Variable consideration within the transaction price, if any, reflects concessions provided to the customer such 
as  discounts,  rebates  and  refunds,  any  potential  bonuses  receivable  from  the  customer  and  any  other 
contingent events. Such  estimates are  determined  using either the  'expected  value'  or 'most likely  amount' 
method. The measurement of variable consideration is subject to a constraining  principle whereby revenue 
will  only  be  recognised  to  the  extent  that  it  is  highly  probable  that  a  significant  reversal  in  the  amount  of 
cumulative  revenue  recognised  will  not  occur.  The  measurement  constraint  continues  until  the  uncertainty 
associated with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved. Amounts received that are subject to the 
constraining principle are recognised as a refund liability. 
Rendering of services 
Revenue from a contract to provide services is recognised over time as the services are rendered based on 
either a fixed price or an hourly rate. 
Interest 
Interest revenue  is recognised as interest accrues using the effective interest  method. This  is  a  method of 
calculating the amortised cost of a financial asset and allocating the interest income over the relevant period 
using the effective interest rate, which is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash receipts through 
the expected life of the financial asset to the net carrying amount of the financial asset. 
Grants 
Grant revenue is recognised in profit or loss when the Group satisfies the performance obligations stated within 
the funding agreements. If conditions are attached to the grant which must be satisfied before the company is 
eligible to retain the contribution, the grant will be recognised in the statement of financial position as a liability 
until those conditions are satisfied. 
Other revenue 
Other revenue is recognised when it is received or when the right to receive payment is established. 
(u) 
Foreign currency translation 
Foreign currency transactions 
Foreign currency transactions are translated into Australian dollars using the exchange rates prevailing at the 
dates  of  the  transactions.  Foreign  exchange  gains  and  losses  resulting  from  the  settlement  of  such 
transactions and from the translation at financial year-end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities 
denominated in foreign currencies are recognised in profit or loss. 
Foreign operations 
The assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated into Australian dollars using the exchange rates 
at the reporting date. The revenues and expenses of foreign operations are translated into Australian dollars 
using the average exchange rates, which approximate the rates at the dates of the transactions, for the period. 
(v) 
Segment reporting 
The Group uses a ‘management approach’, under which segment information is presented on the same basis 
as that used for internal reporting purposes. Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the 
internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision maker. The chief operating decision maker, who is 
responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of the operating segments, has been identified 
as the Board of Directors. 
39 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued) 
For the year ended 30 June 2020 
2 
STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) 
(w) 
Income tax 
The income tax expense or revenue for the year is the tax payable on the current year’s taxable income based 
on  the  notional  income  tax  rate,  adjusted  by  changes  in  deferred  tax  assets  and  liabilities  attributable  to 
temporary differences between tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the financial 
statements, and to unused tax losses. 
A deferred tax asset for unused tax losses is recognised only if it is probable that future taxable amounts will 
be available to utilise losses. 
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets 
and liabilities and when the deferred tax balances relate to the same taxation authority. Current tax assets and 
liabilities are offset where the entity has a legally enforceable right to offset and intends either to settle on a 
net basis, or to realise the assets and settle the liability simultaneously. 
(x)  Goods and Services Tax ('GST') and other similar taxes 
Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of associated GST, unless the GST incurred 
is not recoverable from the tax authority. In this case it is recognised as part of the cost of the acquisition of 
the asset or as part of the expense. 
Receivables and payables are stated inclusive of the amount of GST receivable or payable. The net amount 
of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the tax authority is included in other receivables or other payables in 
the statement of financial position. 
Cash  flows  are  presented  on  a  gross  basis.  The  GST  components  of  cash  flows  arising  from  investing  or 
financing  activities which are recoverable from, or payable to  the tax authority,  are presented  as operating 
cash flows. 
(y)  New accounting standards and interpretations 
(i) New and amended standards adopted by the Company 
The Group has adopted all of the new, revised or amending Accounting Standards and Interpretations issued 
by the Australian Accounting Standards Board ('AASB') that are mandatory for the current reporting period. 
Any new or amended Accounting Standards or Interpretations that are not yet mandatory have not been early 
adopted. 
The following Accounting Standards and Interpretations are most relevant to the Group: 
AASB 16 Leases 
The consolidated entity has adopted AASB 16 from 1 July 2019. The standard replaces AASB 117 'Leases' 
and for  lessees eliminates the  classifications of  operating  leases and  finance leases. Except  for short-term 
leases and leases of low-value assets, right-of-use assets and corresponding lease liabilities are recognised 
in  the  statement  of  financial  position.    Straight-line  operating  lease  expense  recognition  is  replaced  with  a 
depreciation charge for the right-of-use assets (included in operating costs) and an interest expense on the 
recognised  lease  liabilities  (included  in  finance  costs).    In  the  earlier  periods  of  the  lease,  the  expenses 
associated with the lease under AASB 16 will be higher when compared to lease expenses under AASB 117. 
However,  EBITDA  (Earnings  Before  Interest,  Tax,  Depreciation  and  Amortisation)  results  improve  as  the 
operating  expense is now replaced  by interest expense and depreciation in profit  or loss. For classification 
within  the  statement  of  cash  flows,  the  interest  portion  is  disclosed  in  operating  activities  and  the  principal 
portion  of  the  lease  payments  are  separately  disclosed  in  financing  activities.  For  lessor  accounting,  the 
standard does not substantially change how a lessor accounts for leases. 
40 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued) 
For the year ended 30 June 2020 
2 
STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) 
Impact of adoption 
AASB 16 was adopted using the modified retrospective approach and as such the comparatives have not been 
restated. The impact of adoption on opening retained profits as at 1 July 2019 was as follows: 
Operating lease commitments as at 1 July 2019 (AASB 117) 
Operating lease commitments discount based on the weighted average incremental 
borrowing rate of 5% (AASB 16) 
Short-term leases not recognised as a right-of-use asset (AASB 16) 
Accumulated depreciation as at 1 July 2019 (AASB 16) 
Right-of-use assets (AASB 16) 
Lease liabilities - current (AASB 16) 
Lease liabilities - non-current (AASB 16) 
Tax effect on the above adjustments 
Reduction in opening retained profits as at 1 July 2019 
1 July 2019 
$ 
78,889 
(2,149) 
(66) 
(25,558) 
51,116 
(38,639) 
(13,304) 
- 
(827) 
When  adopting  AASB  16  from  1  July  2019,  the  consolidated  entity  has  applied  the  following  practical 
expedients: 
  applying a single discount rate to the portfolio of leases with reasonably similar characteristics; 
  accounting for leases with a remaining lease term of 12 months as at 1 July 2019 as short-term leases; 
  excluding any initial direct costs from the measurement of right-of-use assets; 
  using hindsight in determining the lease term when the contract contains options to extend or terminate 
the lease; and 
  not apply AASB 16 to contracts that were not previously identified as containing a lease. 
Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting (Conceptual Framework) 
The revised Conceptual Framework is applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 
2020  and  early  adoption  is  permitted.  The  Conceptual  Framework  contains  new  definition  and  recognition 
criteria  as  well  as  new  guidance  on  measurement  that  affects  several  Accounting  Standards.  Where  the 
consolidated entity has relied on the existing framework in determining its accounting policies for transactions, 
events or conditions that are not otherwise dealt with under the Australian Accounting Standards, the Group 
may need to review such policies under the revised framework. At this time, the application of the Conceptual 
Framework is not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated entity's financial statements. 
3. 
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING JUDGEMENTS, ESTIMATES AND ASSUMPTIONS 
The  preparation  of  the  financial  statements  requires  management  to  make  judgements,  estimates  and 
assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the financial statements. Management continually evaluates 
its  judgements  and  estimates  in  relation  to  assets,  liabilities,  contingent  liabilities,  revenue  and  expenses. 
Management  bases  its  judgements  and  estimates  on  historical  experience  and  on  other  various  factors  it 
believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis of the carrying values 
of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these 
estimates under different assumptions and conditions. 
Management has identified the following critical accounting policies for which significant judgements, estimates 
and assumptions are made. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and 
conditions and may materially affect financial results or the financial position reported in future periods. 
Further details of the nature of these assumptions and conditions may be found in the relevant notes to the 
financial statements. 
41 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued) 
For the year ended 30 June 2020 
3 
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING JUDGEMENTS, ESTIMATES AND ASSUMPTIONS (continued) 
Share based payment transactions 
The Group measures the cost of equity-settled share based payment transactions with employees by reference 
to the fair value of the equity instruments at the grant date. The fair value is determined by using a recognised 
option valuation model, with the assumptions detailed in Note 14. The accounting estimates and assumptions 
relating to equity-settled share based payments would have no impact on the carrying amounts of assets and 
liabilities within the next annual reporting period but may impact expenses and equity. 
Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic 
Judgement has been exercised in considering the impacts that the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has 
had, or may have, on the consolidated entity based on known information. This consideration extends to the 
nature of the products and services offered, customers, supply chain, staffing and geographic regions in which 
the Group operates. Other than as addressed in specific notes, there does not currently appear to be either 
any significant impact upon the financial statements or any significant uncertainties with respect to events or 
conditions which may impact the consolidated entity unfavourably as at the reporting date or subsequently as 
a result of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. 
Income tax 
The consolidated entity is subject to income taxes in the jurisdictions in which it operates. Significant judgement 
is  required  in  determining  the  provision  for  income  tax.  There  are  many  transactions  and  calculations 
undertaken during the ordinary course of business for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. The 
consolidated  entity  recognises  liabilities  for  anticipated  tax  audit  issues  based  on  the  consolidated  entity's 
current understanding of the tax law. Where the final tax outcome of these matters is different from the carrying 
amounts,  such  differences  will  impact  the  current  and  deferred  tax  provisions  in  the  period  in  which  such 
determination is made. 
Recovery of deferred tax assets 
Deferred  tax  assets  are  recognised  for  deductible  temporary  differences  only  if  the  consolidated  entity 
considers it is probable that future taxable amounts will be available to utilise those temporary differences and 
losses. 
Lease term 
The lease term is a significant component in the measurement of both the right-of-use asset and lease liability. 
Judgement is exercised in determining whether there is reasonable certainty that an option to extend the lease 
or purchase the underlying asset will be exercised, or an option to terminate the lease will not be exercised, 
when ascertaining the periods to be included in the lease term. In determining the lease term, all facts and 
circumstances  that  create  an  economical  incentive  to  exercise  an  extension  option,  or  not  to  exercise  a 
termination  option,  are  considered  at  the  lease  commencement  date.  Factors  considered  may  include  the 
importance  of  the  asset  to  the  consolidated  entity's  operations;  comparison  of  terms  and  conditions  to 
prevailing market rates; incurrence of significant penalties; existence of significant leasehold improvements; 
and the costs and disruption to replace the asset. The consolidated entity reassesses whether it is reasonably 
certain to exercise an extension option, or not exercise a termination option, if there is a significant event or 
significant change in circumstances. 
Incremental borrowing rate 
Where  the  interest  rate  implicit  in  a  lease  cannot  be  readily  determined,  an  incremental  borrowing  rate  is 
estimated to discount future lease payments to measure the present value of the lease liability at the lease 
commencement date. Such a rate is based on what the consolidated entity estimates it would have to pay a 
third party to borrow the funds necessary to obtain an asset of a similar value to the right-of-use asset, with 
similar terms, security and economic environment. 
Employee benefits provision 
As discussed in note 1, the liability for employee benefits expected to be settled more than 12 months from 
the reporting date are recognised and measured at the present value of the estimated future cash flows to be 
made  in  respect  of  all  employees  at  the  reporting  date.  In  determining  the  present  value  of  the  liability, 
estimates of attrition rates and pay increases through promotion and inflation have been taken into account. 
42 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued) 
For the year ended 30 June 2020 
3 
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING JUDGEMENTS, ESTIMATES AND ASSUMPTIONS (continued) 
Exploration and evaluation costs 
Exploration and evaluation costs have been capitalised on the basis that the consolidated entity will commence 
commercial production in the future, from which time the costs will be amortised in proportion to the depletion 
of the mineral resources. Key judgements are applied in considering costs to be capitalised which includes 
determining expenditures directly related to these activities and allocating overheads between those that are 
expensed  and  capitalised.  In  addition,  costs  are  only  capitalised  that  are  expected  to  be  recovered  either 
through successful development or sale of the relevant mining interest. Factors that could impact the future 
commercial production at the mine include the level of reserves and resources, future technology changes, 
which could impact the cost of mining, future legal changes and changes in commodity prices. To the extent 
that capitalised costs are determined not to be recoverable in the future, they will be written off in the period in 
which this determination is made. 
4. 
REVENUE FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS 
U-pgrade™ -based income 
Research and development tax refund 
Government cash flow boosts 
Interest received 
5. 
EXPENSES 
Loss before income tax includes the following specific expenses: 
Depreciation 
Plant and equipment 
Right-of-use asset 
Finance costs 
Convertible notes 
Lease liability 
Net foreign exchange loss 
Rental expense relating to operating lease 
Minimum lease payments 
Superannuation expense 
2020 
$ 
2019 
$ 
22,208 
106,362 
100,000 
5,740 
18,336 
101,654 
- 
14,703 
4,588 
41,415 
46,003 
4,317 
- 
4,317 
- 
73,106 
2,853 
21,355 
- 
10,419 
9,707 
41,472 
Defined contribution superannuation expense 
51,791 
56,818 
Share-based payments expense 
Equity-settled share based payments 
163,911 
170,293 
43 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued) 
For the year ended 30 June 2020 
6. 
INCOME TAX 
Loss for year 
Tax expense/(benefit) at tax rate of 27.5% (2019: 27.5%)  
Tax effect of amounts that are not deductible/taxable in calculating taxable 
income 
Impact of reduction in future corporate tax rate 
Deferred tax assets not brought to account 
Revenue losses not brought to account 
Income tax expense/(benefit) 
DEFERRED TAX 
Deferred Tax Assets 
at 25% (2019: 27.5%) unless stated otherwise 
Provisions and accruals 
Capital raising costs 
Overseas tax losses (at 32% corporate tax rate) 
Australian capital losses carried forward 
Australian carried forward revenue losses 
Other 
2020 
$ 
(1,658,605) 
2019 
$ 
(1,296,861) 
(456,116) 
(356,637) 
(4,325) 
28,122 
754,025 
(784,286) 
490,702 
- 
(38,521) 
(38,521) 
367,036 
- 
41,466 
72,351 
706,874 
910,848 
6,804,657 
264 
8,536,460 
36,671 
70,955 
574,395 
1,001,933 
7,185,800 
- 
8,869,754 
The tax benefit of the above Deferred Tax Assets will only be obtained if: 
a)  The company derives future assessable income or a nature and of an amount sufficient to enable the 
benefits to be utilised; and 
b)  The company continues to comply with the conditions for deductibility imposed by law; and 
c)  No changes in income tax legislation adversely affect the company in utilising the benefits 
Deferred Tax Liabilities 
at 25% (2019: 27.5%) 
Prepayments 
Convertible note 
983 
- 
983 
1,081 
- 
1,081 
The  above  Deferred  Tax  Liabilities  have  not  been  recognised  as  they  have  given  rise  to  the  carry  forward 
revenue losses for which the Deferred Tax Asset has not been recognised. 
7. 
TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES 
Current Assets 
GST and VAT refundable 
Other receivables 
Government Cash Flow Boosts 
Loans to entities 
Rental & Security Bonds 
20,029 
5,021 
37,500 
- 
3,360 
65,910 
33,026 
  3,930 
- 
250,000 
- 
286,956 
The Company provided Optimal Mining Limited a bridge loan of $250,000 to provide funding for Optimal while 
it was completing the sale of its Australian Uranium Assets to Marenica.  On 13 December 2019, this amount 
became the cash portion of the purchase price of $250,000 of the Australian Uranium Assets and is recognised 
as part of the tenement acquisition costs capitalised as a non-current asset during the period (refer to note 
10). 
44 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued) 
For the year ended 30 June 2020 
7 
TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES (continued) 
Non-Current Assets 
Amount receivable from sale of Marenica Minerals (Proprietary) Limited 
(incorporated in Namibia) 
Provision for impairment 
Rental & Security Bonds 
2020 
$ 
3,425,275 
2019 
$ 
3,425,275
(3,425,275) 
- 
- 
(3,425,275)
3,360
3,360
The recoverability of the amount receivable from the sale to the Company’s Black Economic Empowerment 
partner  Millennium  Minerals  Pty  Ltd  of  a  5%  interest  in  the  Company’s  shareholding  in  Marenica  Minerals 
(Proprietary) Limited (incorporated in Namibia) is subject to the successful exploitation and development  of 
the Company’s Marenica Uranium Project. As the project has not yet reached a stage at which this can be 
assured, the amount receivable from the purchaser is considered to be impaired. 
8. 
PLANT AND EQUIPMENT 
Cost 
Less: Accumulated Depreciation 
Net book value 
Reconciliations: 
116,093 
(95,845) 
20,248 
112,143 
(91,257) 
20,886 
Reconciliations of written down values at the beginning and end of the current and previous financial year are 
set out below: 
Opening net book amount 
Additions 
Disposals 
Profit on sale 
Depreciation charge 
Closing net book amount 
9. 
RIGHT-OF-USE ASSET 
Land and buildings – right-of-use 
Less: Accumulated depreciation 
20,886 
3,950 
- 
- 
(4,588) 
20,248 
105,293 
(41,046) 
64,247 
13,360 
11,870 
(27) 
- 
(4,317) 
20,886 
- 
- 
- 
The  Company  leases  land  and  buildings  for  its  office  in  Australia  under  a  two-year  agreement  and  for  its 
warehouse in Namibia under a five-year agreement.  On renewal, the terms of the leases are renegotiated.  
The Company also leases land and buildings under a separate agreement of less than two years and is either 
short-term or low-value, so has been expensed as incurred and not capitalised as a right-of-use assets. 
45 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued) 
For the year ended 30 June 2020 
10.  CAPITALISED TENEMENT ACQUISITION COSTS 
Balance at beginning of period/year 
Cash component of purchase price 
Share-based consideration of purchase price 
Acquisition costs 
2020 
$ 
  - 
250,000 
2,502,500 
393,385 
3,145,885 
2019 
$ 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
On  11 December  2019,  the  Company  acquired 100% of the  interests in the  Acquisition Entities  of Optimal 
Mining Limit which collectively hold tenements and minerals resources (“the Acquisition Assets”) in Western 
Australia  and  the  Northern  Territory  that are  prospective  for uranium.   Refer  to Note  17 for the  names and 
countries of incorporation of the Acquisition Entities. Details of the purchase of assets are as follows: 
Amount settled in cash 
Fair value of equity shares issued 
Acquisition costs 
Total 
Recognised amount of identifiable net assets: 
Capitalised exploration expenditure 
Net identifiable assets and liabilities 
Goodwill 
2020 
$ 
250,000 
2,502,500 
393,385 
3,145,885 
3,145,885 
3,145,885 
- 
Capitalised tenement  acquisition costs  represent the  accumulated  cost of  acquiring the Acquisition  Assets.  
Ultimate recoupment of these costs is dependent on the successful development and commercial exploitation 
or alternatively, sale of the respective areas of interest. 
11.  PAYABLES 
Trade payables 
Accrued charges 
2020 
$ 
47,317
180,451
227,768
2019 
$ 
69,019
101,257
170,276
Included in Accrued charges is the sum of $45,000 (2019: $97,500) relating to unpaid non-executive Directors 
fees (inclusive of superannuation) at year end. The sum of $45,000 relates to the Company’s obligation to fund 
the exercise price of options issued to Directors should those specific Directors choose to exercise the options. 
Refer to Note 27 for further information on financial instruments.  Also included in Accrued charges is the sum 
of  $15,820  (2019:  $nil)  relating  to  the  share-based  payment  valuation  of  1,000,000  options  issued  to  the 
Company’s on 3 July 2020, which was part consideration of the selling fees for shares issued during the year. 
Refer to Note 27 for further information on the shares and options issued. 
12.  PROVISIONS 
Current Liabilities 
Provision for annual leave 
Non-Current Liabilities 
Provision for long service leave 
103,318
103,318
38,674
38,674
91,053
91,053
33,985
33,985
46 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued) 
For the year ended 30 June 2020 
13.  CONTRIBUTED EQUITY 
(a)  Ordinary Shares 
Paid up capital – ordinary shares 
Capital raising costs capitalised 
Movement during the year 
Balance at 1 July 2018 
Share placement on 24 September 2018 
Share placement on 13 November 2018 
Share issued to convert converting loan and in lieu of interest on 
convertible notes on 13 November 2018 
Share options issued on 13 December 2018 
Add: Transfer from convertible note reserve 
Less: Share issue costs 
Balance at 30 June 2019 
Balance at 1 July 2019 
Share placement on 1 August 2019 
Exercise of options on 29 November 2019 
In lieu of options exercised on 29 November 2019 
Share options issued on 12 December 2019 
Convertible preference shares issued to Optimal Mining Limited on 17 
December 2019 
Share placement on 17 April 2020 
Share placement on 15 June 2020 
Less: Share issue costs 
Balance at 30 June 2020 
2020 
$ 
57,497,810 
(1,568,552) 
55,929,259 
Number of 
Shares 
57,397,824
8,609,674
3,170,326
2019 
$ 
52,308,844 
(1,278,269) 
51,030,575 
$ 
48,072,158
860,967
317,033
4,034,469
1,769,519
-
-
-
73,212,293
73,212,293
16,012,417
290,698
-
-
27,500,000
13,157,894
13,192,095
-
143,365,397
200
163,926
(153,228)
51,030,575
51,030,575
1,601,242
52,500
31,105
320
2,502,500
500,000
501,300
(290,283)
55,929,259
Ordinary  shares  participate  in  dividends  and  the  proceeds  on  winding  up  of  Marenica  Energy  Limited  in 
proportion to the number of shares held. The fully paid ordinary shares have no par value.  
At  shareholder  meetings,  when a  poll  is called,  each ordinary  share is  entitled  to one  vote otherwise  each 
shareholder has one vote on a show of hands. 
(b)  Share Options 
Movements in share 
options: 
Balance at 1 July 2018 
Issued during the year 
Lapsed during the year 
Balance at 30 June 2019 
Unlisted, 
$0.17 
Options 
28/11/23 
- 
Unlisted, 
$0.17 
Options 
10/12/21 
- 
Unlisted, 
$0.21 
Options 
30/11/21 
422,233 
Unlisted, 
$0.17 
Options 
13/12/20 
- 
Unlisted, 
$0.17 
Options 
13/12/20 
- 
Unlisted, 
$0.17 
Options 
25/05/20 
7,309,998 
Unlisted, 
$0.1806 
Options 
01/12/19 
290,698 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
7,890,000 
7,600,000 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
422,233 
7,890,000 
7,600,000 
7,309,998 
290,698 
Issued during the year 
7,600,000 
19,214,900 
Exercised during the year 
Lapsed during the year 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
Balance at 30 June 2020 
7,600,000 
19,214,900 
422,233 
7,890,000 
7,600,000 
- 
47 
- 
- 
- 
(290,698) 
- 
- 
(7,309,998) 
Unlisted, 
$0.355 
Options 
26/11/18 
320,338 
- 
(320,338) 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued) 
For the year ended 30 June 2020 
14.  RESERVES 
Share-based payments reserve 
Convertible note reserve 
(A)   Share-Based Payments Reserve 
Balance at beginning of year: 
Options issued during the year 
- 
In lieu of placement fees 
-  Directors’ options 
Options lapsed/exercised during the year 
Performance rights vesting (b) 
Balance at end of year: 
(i)  Share Options 
Movements in share options 
Balance as at 1 July 2018 
Options lapsed 
Options issued to placement lead manager 
Options issued to specific officers 
Options issued  
Balance as at 30 June 2019 
Options exercised 
Options lapsed 
Options issued ref. (a) next page 
Balance as at 30 June 2020 
(ii)  Performance Rights 
Movements in performance rights 
Balance as at 1 July 2018 
Rights vesting ref. (b) next page 
Balance as at 30 June 2019 
Rights vesting ref. (b) next page 
Balance as at 30 June 2020 
2020 
$ 
2019 
$ 
485,191 
- 
409,674 
- 
485,191 
409,674 
409,674 
259,373 
48,450 
43,092 
158,112 
164,510 
(136,844) 
(63,084) 
5,799 
5,783 
485,191 
409,674 
Number of 
options 
$ 
8,343,267 
(320,338) 
2,000,000 
7,600,000 
5,890,000 
23,512,929 
236,478 
(63,084) 
43,092 
164,510 
- 
380,996 
(290,698) 
(7,309,998) 
26,814,900 
42,727,133 
(31,105) 
(105,740) 
206,562 
450,713 
Weighted 
average 
exercise 
price 
$ 
0.1795 
0.3550 
0.17 
0.17 
0.17 
0.1708 
0.1806 
0.17 
0.17 
0,1704 
22,896 
5,783 
28,679 
5,799 
34,478 
Total (i) & (ii) Share Based Payments Reserve 
  485,191 
(a)  On 28 November 2019, 7,600,000 options were granted and exercisable at $0.17 each on or before 28 
November  2023,  to  directors  and  management  of  the  Company.  The  fair  value  of  these  options  is 
$0.036867 per option for a total value of $280,189.  The vesting condition attached to these options is 
continuous employment of directors and management of the Company to 13 December 2020.  At the 
reporting period date, the amount vested was $158,112.  In valuing these options the Company used 
the following inputs in the Black Scholes option valuation model.  
48 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued) 
For the year ended 30 June 2020 
14  RESERVES (continued) 
Inputs into the Model 
Grant date share price 
Exercise price 
Expected volatility 
Option life 
Risk-free interest rate 
On  10  December  2019,  3,202,483  options  were  granted  and  exercisable  at  $0.17  each  on  or  before  10 
December 2021, to a broker as part of the fees relating to a placement of shares and options.  The fair value 
of these options is $0.015129 per option (a subscription amount of $0.0001 was paid by the broker and this 
amount has been taken off the valuation) for a total value of $48,450.  In valuing these options the Company 
used the following inputs in the Black Scholes option valuation model. 
$0.086 
$0.170 
79.29% 
4 years 
0.640% 
Inputs into the Model 
Grant date share price 
Exercise price 
Expected volatility 
Option life 
Risk-free interest rate 
$0.073 
$0.170 
79.29% 
2 years 
0.730% 
(b) 
As at the reporting date, 202,500 performance rights remain which have not yet vested. However, the 
expense relating to the fair value of these performance rights has been spread across their seven-year 
life on the assumption that they will vest. If they do not vest, the expense will be reversed. 
(B)   Convertible Note Reserve 
Balance at beginning of year:  
Conversion of convertible note and interest in lieu of shares 
Balance at end of year: 
Nature and purpose of reserves 
(i)  Share-based payments reserve 
2020 
$ 
2019 
$ 
- 
- 
- 
163,926 
(163,926) 
- 
The share-based payments reserve represents the fair value of the actual or estimated number of unexercised 
equity instruments granted to management and consultants of the Company recognised in accordance with 
the  accounting  policy  adopted  for  share-based  payments  and  the  cash  price  of  rights/options  issued  to 
investors. 
(ii)  Convertible note reserve 
The convertible note reserve represented the fair value of the option portion of the convertible note.  
15.  ACCUMULATED LOSSES 
Accumulated losses at beginning of year 
Adjustment for change in accounting policy (note 2) 
Net losses attributable to members of the parent entity 
Options lapsed during the year 
Accumulated losses at the end of the year 
2020 
$ 
(50,936,499) 
(827) 
2019 
$ 
(49,702,722) 
(163,926) 
(1,658,605) 
105,740 
(1,296,861) 
63,084 
(52,490,191) 
(50,936,499) 
49 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued) 
For the year ended 30 June 2020 
16.  SEGMENT INFORMATION 
The  Group  operates  predominately  in  the  mineral  exploration  and  evaluation  industry  in  Namibia.  For 
management  purposes,  the  Group  is  organised  into  one  main  operating  segment  which  involves  the 
exploration and evaluation of uranium deposits in Namibia. All of the Group’s activities are inter-related and 
discrete financial information is reported to the Board (Chief Operating Decision Maker) as a single segment. 
Accordingly, all significant operating decisions are based upon analysis of  the Group as one segment. The 
financial results from this segment are equivalent to the financial results of the Group as a whole. 
17.  RELATED PARTIES 
(a)  Subsidiaries 
The consolidated financial statements include  the financial statements of Marenica Energy Limited and  the 
subsidiaries listed in the following table: 
Name 
Marenica Energy Namibia (Pty) Ltd 
Marenica Minerals (Pty) Ltd 
Marenica Ventures (Pty) Ltd 
Uranium Beneficiation Pty Ltd 
Metals Namibia Pty Ltd 
Africa Uranium Ltd (note 10) 
Jackson Cage Pty Ltd (note 10) 
Northern Territory Uranium Pty Ltd (note 10) 
(b)  Ultimate parent 
Country of 
Incorporation 
Namibia 
Namibia 
Namibia 
Australia 
Namibia 
Australia 
Australia 
Australia 
% Equity 
Interest 
2020 
100% 
% Equity 
Interest 
2019 
100% 
75% 
100% 
100% 
100% 
100% 
100% 
100% 
75% 
100% 
100% 
100% 
- 
- 
- 
Marenica Energy Limited is the ultimate Australian parent entity and ultimate parent of the Group. 
(c)  Key management personnel 
Details relating to key management personnel, including remuneration paid, are included in Note 23 and the 
audited remuneration report section of the Directors’ report. 
18.  COMMITMENTS FOR EXPENDITURE  
Mineral Tenement Lease 
Exploration expenditure 
The  Company  has  been  granted  tenements  in  Namibia  which  have  the 
following exploration commitments 
Within one year 
Between 1 and 5 years 
Lease commitments - operating 
Within one year 
Between 1 and 5 years 
2020 
$ 
2019 
$ 
638,373 
671,123 
1,309,496 
440,492 
993,385 
1,433,877 
26,535 
49,108 
75,643 
40,386 
13,440 
53,826 
50 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued) 
For the year ended 30 June 2020 
19.  CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 
Cash as at the end of the financial year as shown in the Statement of Cash Flows is reconciled to the related 
items in the Statement of Financial Position as follows: 
Cash at bank and on deposit 
Balance per statement of cash flows 
2020 
$ 
1,062,967 
1,062,967 
2019 
$ 
487,862 
487,862 
20.  RECONCILIATION OF LOSS AFTER INCOME TAX TO CASH FLOWS USED IN OPERATING 
ACTIVITIES 
Operating Profit (Loss) 
A  dd non-cash items 
Depreciation 
Interest on unwinding of lease liability 
Share-based payments 
Amortisation of convertible note 
Unrealised foreign exchange loss  
D  ecrease/increase in operating assets and liabilities: 
Receivables 
Trade and other payables 
Provisions 
Accrued interest 
Net cash (outflow) from operating activities 
(1,658,605)
(1,296,861)
45,634
2,713
163,911
-
1,614
4,317
-
132,330
23,541
4,952
(23,243)
(1,062)
16,954
-
(1,452,084)
(28,917)
(132,707)
58,697
82,488
(1,152,160)
21.  EARNINGS PER SHARE 
(a)  Basic earnings per share – cents per share 
Loss attributable to the ordinary equity holders of the Company 
(1.61) 
(1.89) 
(b)  Diluted earnings per share 
Diluted earnings per share are not disclosed as they are not materially different to basic earnings per share. 
(c)  Weighted average number of shares used as the denominator 
Weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the year 
used in calculation of basic earnings per share 
103,291,964  68,554,455 
22.  AUDITORS’ REMUNERATION 
During the year the following fees were paid or payable for services provided by the auditors: 
(a)  Audit services 
Audit and review of financial reports under the Corporations Act 2001 
Audit and review of financial reports of Namibian subsidiaries 
29,500 
6,769 
16,200 
4,524 
(b)  Other services 
Income tax return preparation 
Total remuneration of auditors 
- 
36,269 
- 
20,724 
51 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued) 
For the year ended 30 June 2020 
23.  KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL 
Compensation for Key Management Personnel 
The  aggregate  compensation  made  to  directors  and  other  members  of  key  management  personnel  of  the 
Group is set out below: 
Short term employee benefits 
Post-employment benefits 
Share-based payments 
Total compensation 
24.  SHARE BASED PAYMENTS 
Set out below are summaries of options granted during the year: 
2020 
$ 
579,795 
53,655 
163,911 
797,361 
2019 
$ 
530,664 
47,041 
170,293 
747,998 
2020 
Grant date  Expiry date 
Exercise 
price 
Balance at the 
start of the 
year 
Granted 
Expired/ 
forfeited/ 
other 
Balance at 
the end of the 
year 
3/12/2019 
12/12/2019 
1/12/2023 
11/12/2021 
$0.17 
$0.17 
- 
- 
7,600,000
19,214,900
2019 
Grant date  Expiry date 
Exercise 
price 
Balance at the 
start of the 
year 
Granted 
Expired/ 
forfeited/ 
other 
13/12/2018 
13/12/2018 
13/12/2020 
13/12/2020 
$0.17 
$0.17 
- 
- 
7,890,000
7,600,000
- 
- 
- 
- 
7,600,000
19,214,900
Balance at 
the end of the 
year 
7,890,000
7,600,000
Set out below are the options exercisable at the end of the financial year: 
Grant date 
Expiry date 
30/11/2015 
22/11/2017 
25/05/2018 
13/12/2018 
13/12/2018 
3/12/2019 
11/12/2019 
1/12/2019 
30/11/2021 
25/05/2020 
13/12/2020 
13/12/2020 
28/11/2023 
10/12/2021 
2020 
Number 
-
422,233
-
7,890,000
7,600,000
7,600,000  
19,214,900
42,727,133
2019 
Number 
290,698 
422,233 
7,309,998 
7,890,000 
7,600,000 
- 
- 
 23,512,929 
The weighted average exercise price during the financial year was $0.1704 (2019: $0.1708). 
The weighted average remaining contractual life of options outstanding at the end of the financial year was 
1.44 years (2019: 1.29 years). 
52 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued) 
For the year ended 30 June 2020 
25.  PARENT ENTITY FINANCIAL INFORMATION 
(a)  Information relating to Marenica Energy Limited 
Current Assets 
Non-Current Assets 
Total Assets 
Current Liabilities 
Non-Current Liabilities 
Total Liabilities 
NET ASSETS 
EQUITY 
Issued capital 
Reserves 
Accumulated losses 
TOTAL EQUITY 
Loss for the year 
Total comprehensive income 
(b)  Guarantees 
2020 
$ 
1,100,675
3,290,202
4,390,877
2019 
$ 
748,855
20,886
769,741
(342,494)
(257,572)
(38,674)
(33,985) 
(382,168)
(291,557) 
4,009,709
478,184 
55,929,259 51,030,575 
485,191
409,674 
(52,404,741) (50,962,065) 
4,009,709
478,184 
(1,547,589)
(1,328,335) 
(1,547,589)
(1,328,335) 
No guarantees have been entered into by the Company in relation to the debts of its subsidiaries. 
(c)  Commitments 
Commitments of the Company as at reporting date are disclosed in Note 18 to the financial statements. 
26.  CONTINGENT LIABILITIES  
Mallee Minerals Pty Limited 
On  7  April  2006,  the  Company  entered  into  an  introduction  agreement  with  Mallee  Minerals  Pty  Limited  in 
respect of a mineral licence in Namibia (Project). Upon the Company receiving a bankable feasibility study in 
respect of the Project or the Company delineating, classifying or reclassifying uranium resources in respect of 
the project, the Company will pay to Mallee Minerals Pty Limited: 
(i)  $0.01 per tonne of uranium ore classified as inferred resources in respect of the Project; and a further 
(ii)  $0.02 per tonne of uranium ore classified as indicated resources in respect of the Project; and a further 
(iii)  $0.03 per tonne of uranium ore classified as measured resources in respect of the Project. 
Pursuant to this agreement, no payments were made during the year ended June 2020 (2019: nil).  In total 
$2,026,000 has been paid under this agreement. 
Metals Australia Limited 
In May 2018, the Company signed binding agreement to purchase the Mile 72 Uranium Project (EPL 3308) 
from  Metals  Australia  Limited.  The  agreement  includes  a  provision  to  pay  a  gross  production  preferential 
dividend of 1% on any production from EPL 3308. 
Jackson Cage Royalties 
On 13 December 2019, Marenica acquired Jackson  Cage  Pty Ltd (“Jackson Cage”), one  of the Acquisition 
Entities acquired from Optimal Mining Limited.  Jackson Cage is liable for a 1% gross royalty payable to Paladin 
Energy Limited and a 1% gross royalty payable to Areva Resources Australia Pty Ltd on any production from 
the Oobagooma Project in Western Australia (being tenement E04/2297) and a 1.5% gross royalty payable to 
Paladin  NT  Pty  Ltd  on  any  production  from  the  Pamela/Angela  Project  in  the  Northern  Territory  (being 
tenement application EL25759 and tenement EL25758). 
53 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued) 
For the year ended 30 June 2020 
26  CONTINGENT LIABILITIES (continued) 
Marenica Namibia VAT 
Marenica  Energy Namibia  Pty  Ltd (“Marenica  Namibia”), a subsidiary of the  Group,  received an  equivalent 
amount in Australian Dollars of $26,470 that relate to Namibian VAT debtors from prior reporting periods which 
were previously not considered to be recoverable. Marenica Namibia will be liable to pay the stated amount 
back if the Namibian VAT authorities issue a letter demanding the stated amount to be repaid 
27.  EVENTS AFTER THE REPORTING PERIOD 
On  3  July  2020,  the  Company  announced  that  it  issued  26,349,989  Placement  Options  to  those  who 
participated in the Placement which raised $1,001,300. The Placement consisted of two tranches: 
- 
- 
The issue on 17 April 2020 of 13,157,894 Shares at an issue price of $0.038 per Share; and 
The issue on 15 June 2020 of 13,192,095 Shares at an issue price of $0.038 per Share 
The Placement Options were granted on the basis of one Option for every Share subscribed. The company 
also announced that it issued 1,000,000 Broker Options to the participating brokers. The Placement Options 
and Broker Options are exercisable at $0.10 within three years of grant.  
The  impact  of  the  Coronavirus  (COVID-19)  pandemic  is  ongoing  and  it  is  not  practicable  to  estimate  the 
potential  impact,  positive  or  negative,  after  the  reporting  date.  The  situation  is  rapidly  developing  and  is 
dependent  on  measures  imposed  by  the  Australian  Government  and  other  countries,  such  as  maintaining 
social distancing requirements, quarantine, travel restrictions and any economic stimulus that may be provided. 
Other than the matters referred to above, there have been no matters or circumstances that have arisen since 
the end of the financial year which significantly affected or may significantly affect: 
(i) 
the Group's operations in future years; or 
(ii) 
the results of those operations in future years; or 
(iii)  the Group's state of affairs in future years. 
28. 
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS 
Overview – Risk Management 
This note presents information about the Group’s exposure to credit, liquidity and market risks, its objectives, 
policies and processes for measuring and managing risk and the management of capital. 
The Group does not  use  any form of  derivatives as it is  not  at a  level of  exposure  that  requires the  use  of 
derivatives to hedge its exposure. Exposure limits are reviewed by management on a continuous basis. The 
Group  does  not  enter  into  or  trade  financial  instruments,  including  derivative  financial  instruments,  for 
speculative purposes. 
The Board of Directors of the Company has overall responsibility for the establishment and oversight of the 
risk management framework. Management monitors and manages the financial risks relating to the operations 
of the Company and the Group through regular reviews of the risks. 
Credit risk 
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Group if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails 
to  meet  its  contractual  obligations  and  arises  principally  from  the  Group’s  receivables  from  customers  and 
investment securities. At 30 June 2020, there were no significant concentrations of credit risk. 
Cash and cash equivalents 
The Group limits its exposure to credit risk by only investing in liquid securities and only with counterparties 
that have an acceptable credit rating. 
Trade and other receivables 
As the Group operates primarily in exploration activities, it does not have any significant trade receivables and 
therefore is not exposed to credit risk in relation to trade receivables. 
The Group where necessary establishes an allowance for impairment that represents its estimate of incurred 
losses in respect of other receivables and investments. Management does not expect any counterparty to fail 
to meet its obligations. 
54 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued) 
For the year ended 30 June 2020 
28 
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued) 
Exposure to credit risk 
The carrying amount of the Group’s financial assets represents the maximum credit exposure. The Group’s 
maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date was: 
Trade and other receivables 
Cash and cash equivalents 
Impairment Losses 
None of the Group’s receivables are past due (2019: $ nil). 
Liquidity Risk 
Note 
7 
19 
2020 
$ 
2019 
$ 
65,910 
290,316 
1,062,967 
487,862 
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. The 
Group’s approach to managing liquidity is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will always have sufficient liquidity 
to  meet  its liabilities when  due,  under  both  normal  and  stressed  conditions, without  incurring  unacceptable 
losses or risking damage to the Group’s reputation. 
The Group manages liquidity risk by maintaining adequate cash reserves from funds raised in the market and 
by continuously monitoring forecast and actual flows. Apart from the convertible note, the Group does not have 
any significant external borrowings. 
The  Group  will  need  to  raise  additional  capital  in  the  next  12  months  to  meet  forecast  operational  and 
development activities. The decision on when and how the Group will raise future capital will depend on market 
conditions existing at that time. 
The following are the contractual maturities of financial liabilities, including estimated interest payments and 
excluding the impact of netting agreements: 
30 June 2020 
Note 
Trade and other payables 
Directors Fees 
11 
11 
30 June 2019 
Note 
Trade and other payables 
Directors Fees 
11 
11 
Carrying 
amount 
182,768 
45,000 
Carrying 
amount 
72,776 
97,500 
Contractual 
cash flow 
182,768 
45,000 
Contractual 
cash flow 
72,776 
97,500 
6 months  
or less 
182,768 
- 
6 months 
or less 
72,776 
52,500 
>12 
months 
- 
45,000 
>12 
months 
- 
45,000 
Market Risk 
Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as foreign exchange rates, interest rates and equity 
prices will affect the Group’s income or the value of its holdings of financial instruments. The objective of market 
risk  management  is  to  manage  and  control  market  risk  exposure  within  acceptable  parameters,  while 
optimising the return. 
Currency Risk 
The Group’s exposure to currency risk at 30 June 2020 on financial assets denominated in Namibian dollars 
was nil (2019: nil) which amounts are not hedged. The effect of future movements in the exchange rate for 
Namibian  dollars on the  Group’s financial  position  and  results  of fully  expensed  exploration  and  evaluation 
activities is likely to be negligible. 
Interest Rate Risk 
The Group is exposed to interest rate risk (primarily on its cash and cash equivalents), which is the risk that a 
financial instrument’s value will fluctuate as a result of changes in the market interest rates on interest-bearing 
financial instruments. The Group does not use derivatives to mitigate these exposures. 
The Company adopts a policy of ensuring that as far as possible it maintains excess cash and cash equivalents 
on short term deposit at interest rates maturing over 30 to 90 day rolling periods. 
55 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued) 
For the year ended 30 June 2020 
28 
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued) 
Profile 
At the reporting date the interest rate profile of the Group’s interest-bearing financial instruments was: 
Fixed rate instruments 
Financial assets – cash and cash equivalents 
Variable rate instruments 
Financial assets – cash and cash equivalents 
Fair value sensitivity analysis for fixed rate instruments 
Carrying Amount 
2019 
$ 
2020 
$ 
- 
300,000 
1,062,967 
187,862 
The Company does not account for any fixed rate financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or 
loss or through equity, therefore a change in interest rates at the reporting date would not affect profit or loss 
or equity. 
Cash flow sensitivity analysis for variable rate instruments 
A change of 50 basis points (2019: 50 basis points) in interest rates at the reporting date would have increased 
(decreased)  equity  and  profit  or  loss  by  the  amounts  shown  below.  This  analysis  assumes  that  all  other 
variables remain constant. The analysis is performed on the same basis for 2020. 
30 June 2020 
Variable rate instruments 
30 June 2019 
Variable rate instruments 
Profit or loss 
Equity 
50bp  
increase 
5,315 
50bp 
increase 
939 
50bp  
decrease 
(5,315) 
50bp 
decrease 
(939) 
50bp  
increase 
5,315 
50bp 
increase 
939 
50bp 
decrease 
(5,315) 
50bp 
decrease 
(939) 
Fair Value of financial instruments 
Unless otherwise stated, the carrying amounts of financial instruments reflect their fair value. 
Commodity Price Risk 
The Group operates primarily in the exploration and evaluation phase and accordingly the Group’s financial 
assets and liabilities are subject to minimal commodity price risk. 
Capital Management 
The Group’s objectives when managing  capital are  to  safeguard  the Group’s ability to continue  as a  going 
concern, so as to maintain a strong capital base sufficient to maintain future exploration and development of 
its projects. The Group’s focus has been to raise sufficient funds through equity or debt to fund its exploration 
and evaluation activities. 
There were no changes in the Group’s approach to capital management during the year. Risk management 
policies and procedures are established with regular monitoring and reporting. 
The Group is not subject to externally imposed capital requirements. 
29. 
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT 
Fair value hierarchy 
The  carrying  amounts  of  trade  and  other  receivables  and  trade  and  other  payables  are  assumed  to 
approximate their fair values due to their short-term nature. 
56 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Directors’ Declaration 
The Directors of the Company declare that: 
1. 
the  financial  statements,  notes  and  additional  disclosures  included  in  the  Directors’  Report  designated  as 
audited, of the Company and of the Group are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including: 
a.  complying with Accounting Standards and the Corporations Regulations 2001; and 
b.  giving a true and fair view of the Company’s and Group’s financial position as at 30 June 2020 and 
of their performance for the year ended on that date. 
2. 
in the Directors' opinion there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company and Group will be able to 
pay their debts as and when they become due and payable. 
3. 
the financial report also complies with International Financial Reporting Standards. 
4. 
this  declaration  has  been  made  after  receiving  the  declarations  required  to  be  made  to  the  Directors  in 
accordance with section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001 for the financial year ended 30 June 2020. 
This declaration is made in accordance with a resolution of the board of Directors.  
On behalf of the board. 
Andrew Bantock
Chairman 
Perth 
30 September 2020 
57 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF
MARENICA ENERGY LIMITED
Report on the Audit of the Financial Report
Opinion
We have audited the financial report of Marenica Energy Limited (“the Company”) and its controlled entities
(“the  Group”) which comprises the statement  of financial position as at  30 June 2020, the statement  of 
profit or loss and other comprehensive income, the statement of changes in equity and the statement of 
cash flows for the year then ended on that date and notes to the financial statements, including a summary 
of significant accounting policies and the directors’ declaration of the Company.
In our opinion the financial report of the Group is in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including:
(i) giving a true and fair view of the Group’s financial position as at 30 June 2020 and of its financial 
performance for the year ended on that date; and
(ii) complying with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Regulations 2001.
Basis for Opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. Our responsibilities under these 
standards  are  further  described  in  the  Auditor’s  Responsibilities  for  the  Audit  of  the  Financial  Report
section  of  this  report.  We are  independent  of  the  Group in  accordance  with  the  auditor  independence 
requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 and the ethical requirements of the Accounting Professional and 
Ethical Standards  Board’s  APES 110 Code of  Ethics  for Professional Accountants (including Independence 
Standards) (the “Code”) that are relevant to our audit of the financial report in Australia. We have also 
fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with the Code.
We confirm that the independence declaration required by the Corporations Act 2001, which has been given 
to the directors of the Company, would be in the same terms if given to the directors as at the time of this 
auditor’s report.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our 
opinion.
Key Audit Matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our 
audit of the financial report of the current period. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit 
of the financial report as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate 
opinion on these matters.
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF
MARENICA ENERGY LIMITED (continued)
Key Audit Matter – Cash and Cash Equivalents
How our Audit Addressed the Key Audit Matter
The Group’s cash and cash equivalents make up 94%
of current assets by value and are considered to be 
the key driver of the Group’s operations. 
Our  procedures  over  the  existence  of  the  Group’s 
cash  and  cash  equivalents included  but  were  not 
limited to:
We do not consider cash and cash equivalents to be 
at a high risk of significant misstatement or to be 
subject to a significant level of judgement.
However due to their materiality in the context of 
the financial statements as a whole, they are 
considered to be the area which had an effect on 
our overall strategy and allocation of resources in 
planning and completing our audit.
Key Audit Matter – Exploration and evaluation 
expenditure
During the year the Group has acquired a 100% 
interest in the Australian Uranium Assets of Optimal 
Mining Limited which hold tenements and mineral 
resources. 
We do not consider the acquisition of the entities 
and underlying tenements to be at a high risk of 
significant misstatement, or to be subject to a 
significant level of judgement.
However due to the materiality in the context of 
the financial statements as a whole, this is 
considered to be an area which had an effect on our 
overall strategy and allocation of resources in 
planning and completing our audit.
Documenting and assessing the processes and 
controls in place to record cash transactions;
Testing  a  sample  of  cash  payments  to 
determine  they  were  bona  fide  payments, 
were properly authorised and recorded in the 
general ledger; and
Agreeing balances to independent 
confirmations.
We have also assessed the appropriateness of the 
disclosures included in the financial report.
How our Audit Addressed the Key Audit Matter
Our procedures in assessing exploration and 
evaluation expenditure included but were not 
limited to the following:
 We assessed exploration and evaluation 
expenditure with reference to AASB 6 
Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral 
Resources;
 We assessed the treatment of the 
acquisition with reference to AASB 3 
Business Combinations;
 We tested a sample of exploration and 
evaluation expenditure to supporting 
documentation to ensure they were bona 
fide payments; and
 We documented and assessed the processes 
and controls in place to record exploration 
and evaluation transactions.
We have also assessed the appropriateness of the 
disclosures included in the financial report.
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF
MARENICA ENERGY LIMITED (continued)
Other Information
The directors are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information 
included in the Group’s annual report for the year ended 30 June 2020, but does not include the financial 
report and our auditor’s report thereon.
Our opinion on the financial report does not cover the other information and accordingly we do not express 
any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the financial report, our responsibility is to read the other information and, 
in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial report or 
our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.
If  based  on  the  work  we  have  performed  we  conclude  there  is  a  material  misstatement  of  this  other 
information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
Directors’ Responsibility for the Financial Report
The directors of the Company are responsible for the preparation of the financial report that gives a true 
and fair view in accordance with the Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Act 2001 and for 
such  internal  control  as  the  directors  determine  is  necessary  to  enable  the  preparation  of  the  financial 
report that gives a true and fair view and is free from material misstatement whether due to fraud or error.
In  preparing  the  financial  report,  the  directors  are  responsible  for  assessing  the  ability  of  the  Group to 
continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going 
concern basis of accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate the Group or cease operations, 
or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
Auditor’s Responsibility for the Audit of the Financial Report
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial report as a whole is free 
from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes 
our  opinion.  Reasonable  assurance  is  a  high  level  of  assurance,  but  is  not  a  guarantee  that  an  audit 
conducted  in  accordance  with  Australian  Auditing  Standards  will  always  detect  a  material  misstatement 
when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if individually or in 
the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the 
basis of this financial report.
A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial report is located at the Auditing 
and Assurance Standards Board website at: www.auasb.gov.au/Home.aspx. 
We communicate with the directors regarding, amongst other matters, the planned scope and timing of the 
audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify 
during our audit.
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF
MARENICA ENERGY LIMITED (continued)
We also provide the directors with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements 
regarding  independence,  and  to  communicate  with  them  all  relationships  and  other  matters  that  may 
reasonably be thought to bear on our independence and where applicable, related safeguards.
From  the  matters  communicated  with  the  directors,  we  determine  those  matters  that  were  of  most 
significance in the audit of the financial report of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. 
We describe those matters in our auditor’s report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about 
the  matter  or  when,  in  extremely  rare  circumstances,  we  determine  that  a  matter  should  not  be 
communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected 
to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communications.
Report on the Remuneration Report
Opinion on the Remuneration Report
We have audited the remuneration report included in the directors’ report for the year ended 30 June 2020. 
In our opinion the remuneration report of Marenica Energy Limited for the year ended 30 June 2020 complies 
with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001.
Responsibilities
The  directors of the Company are responsible for the preparation  and presentation  of the Remuneration 
Report in accordance with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001. Our responsibility is to express an 
opinion on the Remuneration Report, based on our audit conducted in accordance with Australian Auditing 
Standards.
Rothsay Auditing
Dated 30 September 2020
Daniel Dalla
Partner
Additional ASX Information  
The following additional information is required by the Australian Securities Exchange and is current 
as at 6 September 2020. 
(a)  Distribution schedule and number of holders of equity securities 
Fully Paid 
Ordinary Shares 
(MEY) 
Unlisted Options 
– $0.21 
30/11/2021 
Unlisted Options 
– $0.17 
13/12/2020 (A) 
Unlisted Options 
– $0.17 
13/12/2020 (B) 
Unlisted Options 
- $0.17 
01/12/2023 
Unlisted Options 
- $0.17 
11/12/2021 
Unlisted Options 
- $0.10 
30/06/2023 
Performance 
Rights 
1 – 1,000 
1,001 – 
5,000 
5,001 – 
10,000 
10,001 – 
100,000 
100,001 – 
and over 
Total 
3,815 
843 
243 
405 
186 
5,492 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
1 
2 
29 
21 
- 
- 
4 
4 
16 
32 
3 
- 
47 
1 
3 
50 
4 
4 
48 
50 
1 
The number of holders holding less than a marketable parcel of fully paid ordinary shares 4,736. 
62 
 
 
 
                                                                                                  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
Additional ASX Information 
(b)  20 Largest holders of quoted equity securities 
The names of the twenty largest holders of fully paid ordinary shares (ASX code: MEY) are: 
Rank  Name 
Shares 
% of Total 
Shares 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
Hanlong Resources Limited 
11,635,072 
Retzos Executive Pty Ltd  
Amax Holdings Pty Ltd 
Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above