More annual reports from Erdene Resource Development Corporation.:
2023 ReportPeers and competitors of Erdene Resource Development Corporation.:
Insight Enterprises2018
EROAD
ANNUAL
REPORT
2019
2014
2018
2010
2018
+48%
EBITDA
+40%
REVENUE
+17%
FUTURE
CONTRACTED
INCOME
+24%
TOTAL
CONTRACTED
UNITS
TOTAL
CONTRACTED UNITS
FUTURE
CONTRACTED INCOME
REVENUE
EBITDA
+24%
96.4k
77.6k
FY18
FY19
100
80
60
40
20
-
120
100
80
60
40
20
-
+17%
$117.4m
$100.5m
70
60
50
+40%
$61.4m
20
15
+48%
$15.6m
40
$43.8m
30
20
10
-
FY18
FY19
10
$10.5m
5
-
FY18
FY19
FY18
FY19
FY19
Key Results
1
ANZ
Momentum
continues in
New Zealand
• Solid growth continues for the run-rate business in small-
medium (SMB) fleets, via both new customers
and upgrades.
• Health & safety offering continues to drive growth into
lighter vehicle segment.
2 ANZ
Australia
re-launch
• Re-launch plan successfully implemented.
• Launched specific products to address Australian
regulations leading to encouraging pipeline and inclusion
in funding trials.
3 NA
Focussed plan for
run-rate business,
first major enterprise
rolling out
• Moved to geo-vertical strategy to build a highly focussed
and sustainable run-rate business in SMB space.
• Targeting enterprise customers on a selective basis.
• Contracted largest customer to date, one of the largest
privately owned fleets in NA.
4 Global
Major investment
in leadership
• EROAD made a major investment in
leadership during FY19.
• The executive team is now fully established and positions
EROAD for continued growth across all markets.
5 Global
Investing for next
growth phase
• Substantial investments to enable scalable systems,
processes, improved customer service and operating
leverage.
• The established growth incubators for regulatory trials,
data insights and new ventures are gaining traction across
all markets.
KEY DATES
4
TABLE OF CONTENTS
5
EROAD believes that
every community
deserves safer roads
and the people who
use the roads should
influence the design,
management and
funding of transport
networks.
This is why EROAD develops
technology solutions (products
and services) that manage
vehicle fleets, support regulatory
compliance, improve driver safety
and reduce the costs associated
with driving. These are delivered
through a single platform, making
our products and services really
easy to use.
EROAD also provides valuable
insights and data analytics to
universities, government agencies
and others for the research, trial
and evaluation of future transport
networks.
1
06–17
CHAIRMAN’S REPORT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
CEO’S REPORT
EXECUTIVE TEAM
2
18–31
FINANCIAL
HIGHLIGHTS
3
32–55
ABOUT
EROAD
5
106–119
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
4
56–105
AUDITOR’S REPORT
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
6
120–131
REGULATORY DISCLOSURES
OTHER INFORMATION
GLOSSARY
KEY DATES
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019CHAIRMAN’S REPORT
6
CHAIRMAN’S REPORT
7
A year of good progress
I am pleased to present EROAD’s 2019 annual report and financial statements.
This has been a year of good progress. Your company has maintained double-digit
growth in revenue (40%), EBITDA (48%) and total contracted units (24%); while
simultaneously progressing with an investment programme that ensures EROAD has
solid foundations for profitable future growth.
In the pages that follow, you will read of our solid operational result and business
achievements in the 2019 Financial Year. The Board are pleased that Steven and his
team have been able to pursue significant strategic initiatives, while at the same time
maintaining solid operational momentum.
Last year EROAD achieved several significant milestones in
our journey from a start-up to an established market leader,
and we are now positioning ourselves for the next phase of
growth.
BOARD UPDATE
Your Board has worked diligently this past year and I want to
thank my colleagues for their support and their insights. Over
the past 12 months the Board has undergone several changes.
The addressable market for our services is large, growing
quickly and global. EROAD’s strategy is to operate in two key
geographies, Australasia and North America, focussing on a
specific set of customer needs: regulatory compliance, health
and safety and reliability. We believe that by pursuing this
focussed strategy EROAD can achieve leadership in these
markets.
Being high growth, this market is also well contested and
subject to near constant disruption. Securing a leadership
position will require ongoing investment in innovation and
development, firstly to retain our existing customers and then
to attract new customers. Our highly capable engineering
resources retain this focus.
The key challenge for the business in this next phase is
to make the most of our organic growth opportunities,
by growing revenues faster than the overall market for
commercial vehicle telematic solutions. We will also consider
non-organic growth initiatives when and where appropriate.
This past year has been one of refining our focus and
investing to ensure that EROAD’s business model is scalable
to manage our next phase of growth.
In the 2020 Financial Year we are looking to successfully
complete the initiatives started last year and to continue
building strong growth.
The team at EROAD share a passion for making our roads
safer and more productive. We believe that decisions
affecting our roads should be well informed through the
masses of data that we can now access and analyse. EROAD
believes it has a role to play in making our roads safer and this
is why we are establishing growth incubators that will make
a difference to our business and our communities. Dynamic
Risk, an innovative research methodology that uses real data
to identify high risk areas on our roads, is a good example of
how we are doing this. Dynamic Risk is already receiving high
interest from academia and transport authorities.
In August Michael Bushby stepped down as Chairman and
remains on the Board. Having chaired the Board for six
years Michael felt it an opportune time for the leadership to
transition now that the company has progressed from start-
up mode to generating self-sustaining cash flows.
In March Gregg Dal Ponte signalled his intention to retire from
the Board at the end of April 2019. I want to thank Gregg
for his service to EROAD. During his tenure the foundations
for the future success of our North American business were
laid; we exceeded 20,000 installed Ehubo units, won our first
major enterprise client and reached the important financial
milestone of being EBITDA positive.
In March we welcomed Susan Paterson to the Board. Susan
brings a wealth of experience in business and governance.
I would like to thank the leadership team and most
importantly our people for their diligent work over the past
year. The Board is acutely aware that the upward trajectory
of the business is underpinned by the commitment of
EROADers and is deeply appreciative of their contribution.
Our annual meeting this year will again be held at the QBE
Events Centre in Albany on 1 August at 4:45pm, I look forward
to seeing you there.
Graham Stuart, Chairman
Graham Stuart
Chairman
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
8
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
9
BOARD OF
DIRECTORS
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019BOARD OF DIRECTORS
10
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
11
GRAHAM STUART
Chairman, Member of Remuneration, Talent
and Nomination Committee.
Graham joined the EROAD Board in January
2018 and was appointed Chairman in August
of the same year. He was previously CEO
of Sealord Group, CFO then Director of
Strategy & Growth at Fonterra and has had
extensive business experience in South East
Asia, Europe, the UK and Latin America.
MICHAEL BUSHBY
Independent Director, Member of
Remuneration, Talent and Nomination
Committee and Finance, Risk and Audit
Committee.
Michael stepped down as Chairman in
August 2018, having led the Board since
2012. Michael is based in Australia where
he is a consultant at WSP Australia and
previously held roles as General Manager of
the Ventia Asset and Infrastructure Services
division and CEO at the Roads and Traffic
Authority in New South Wales.
TONY GIBSON
Independent Director, Chairman of the
Remuneration, Talent and Nomination
Committee and Member of Finance, Risk and
Audit Committee.
Tony is the Chief Executive of Ports of
Auckland and one of New Zealand’s most
experienced transport professionals. He
has worked in various senior management
roles in Africa, Asia and Europe. In 2008 the
Minister of Transport appointed him to the
Road User Review Group. Tony joined the
Board in October 2009.
CANDACE KINSER
Independent Director, Member of
Remuneration, Talent and Nomination
Committee and Finance, Risk and Audit
Committee.
Candace is an experienced director, CEO
and Tech entrepreneur. She was previously
the CEO of the NZ Technology Industry
Association and the CEO of science software
company Biomatters. She is a Director of
companies including Talent International,
Livestock Improvement Corporation, WEL
Network Limited and Ultrafast Fibre Limited.
Candace joined the Board in April 2014.
SUSAN PATERSON
Independent Director, Chair of the Finance,
Risk and Audit Committee, Member of
Remuneration, Talent and Nomination
Committee.
Susan joined the Board in March 2019. She
is an appointed Officer of New Zealand
Order of Merit (services to governance) and
currently chairs Steel and Tube Holdings
and IT consultancy Theta Systems. She is
a director of the boards of the Electricity
Authority, Arvida Group, Goodman New
Zealand, Les Mills Holdings and Sky Network
Television.
STEVEN NEWMAN
Executive Director / CEO
Steven has been EROAD’s chief executive
and a member of the EROAD Board since
2007. He co-founded Navman where
his COO and CEO roles provided the
opportunity for him to establish Navman
as a leading international brand delivering
annual sales in excess of NZ $500m.
BOARD OF
DIRECTORS
GREGG DAL PONTE
Independent Director, Member of
Remuneration, Talent and Nomination
Committee.
US-based Gregg joined the EROAD Board in
July 2016, resigning effective 30 April 2019.
Gregg was previously the Administrator
for the Oregon Department of Transports
Motor Carrier Transportation Division and a
Director of Regulatory Compliance for the
Oregon Trucking Association.
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019CEO’S REPORT
12
CEO’S REPORT
13
To drive on our roads
should not require spinning
the roulette wheel of life.
It is heart-warming indeed
to know that what we do,
what our products and
services enable for our
customers, also helps get
more people home safely,
every night.
Steven Newman
CEO, EROAD
Steven Newman
CEO
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019CEO’S REPORT
14
CEO’S REPORT
15
Continued innovation, exemplary
service and sustained reliability
This year we’ve built a solid platform for future growth. We’ve made significant progress
implementing the investment program set out in the strategic plan approved at the time of capital
raise (Dec ‘17- Feb ’18), ensuring we can scale efficiently, improve our customer experience and
provide greater operating leverage.
And here’s why:
•
Ten years ago, we introduced the world’s first nationwide electronic
road user charging (ERUC) system. Now, more than 46% of New
Zealand’s heavy vehicle RUC dollars are collected through EROAD
attracting interest from those researching or trialling funding options
for transport networks.
• Ten years ago, we were a domestic company with one product and
less than 50 staff. Now, we have customers and staff across three
markets, expanding our offerings in compliance, fleet management
and health and safety.
• Over the past year, EROAD has supported journeys of more than
3.2 billion kilometres travelled by trucks and light vehicles in New
Zealand, Australia and the United States of America. More customers,
more journeys, more data, more knowledge for informed decision
making. We must continually evolve the business to remain relevant in
this constantly changing environment.
It was Andy Warhol who said: “They always say time changes things,
but you actually have to change them yourself”. Over time, our
customers have grown - some exponentially increasing their fleet
sizes, some new to the value of telematics. A range of new regulatory
requirements have also been expanded or introduced. That’s why we
must adapt/evolve our business, so that we can scale efficiently to
address the needs of our customers, communities and stakeholders.
We are improving safety on our roads because our products and
services support better driving. I believe we can state that because
we have customers who are seeing impressive reductions in the
number of incidents occurring: “Our over-speed incidents have
reduced by 83%”, “Our incident rate reduced by almost 90%
immediately after installation” are just a couple of examples that we
hear from our customers. To drive on our roads should not require
spinning the roulette wheel of life. It is heart-warming indeed to know
that what we do, what our products and services enable for our
customers, also helps get more people home safely, every night.
While we invest for the future, we continue to grow. In the past
year our revenue rose to NZ$61.4m, EBITDA was up 48%, our total
contracted units grew to 71,446 (ANZ) and 24,944 (NA) and our
pipelines remain encouragingly strong within all three markets.
Our growth continues through regulatory disruption, because fuel
taxation revenues are under pressure and safety on our roads needs
to get better. EROAD has significant gravitas in this field, having
pioneered the world’s first nationwide electronic Road User Charging
system (NZ), the first electronic Weight Mile Tax service (USA) and
the first independently verified Electronic Logging Device (USA) to
manage driver fatigue.
In summary, maintaining this momentum requires continued
innovation, exemplary service and sustained reliability. Preserving
these factors has required the programme of investment commenced
during this past year.
EROAD is more robust and well positioned for sustained growth
across all markets, validating your continued support.
Steven Newman, CEO
The investment we have been implementing during 2019 has already delivered:
• New staff with strong track records in their respective fields.
Our leadership team has been strengthened and other key
appointments have been made to deepen marketing, sales,
finance, product and R&D capability, as well as establish
leadership teams for each country. This investment ensures
excellent bench strength to deliver our future growth.
• A refresh of our in-vehicle hardware design to decrease the
cost of manufacturing, increase scaleability, and enable 4G
capability. This investment is key to delivering on our future
growth plans in all markets.
• We have commenced implementation of scalable business
systems and processes that ensure we can scale efficiently,
improve the customer experience and provide greater operating
leverage. With continued strong growth rates planned, these
improvements are essential.
• A major refurbishment of our global headquarters, located
in Albany, Auckland, to ensure a modern and effective space
that supports a range of flexible working styles, enhancing
collaboration and allows EROADers to work their magic.
• A successful re-launch into the Australian market. We have
recruited a strong, core sales team in key states, operationally
leveraging off our New Zealand business. The suite of new
regulatory requirements within Australia has unlocked
opportunities for telematics within industries that have
previously not had cause to invest.
• The strategic refresh for North America during the first half of
FY19 created a geo-vertical sales strategy. This enables higher
ROI as efforts are prioritised within the product suites and
US states where our regulatory telematic reliability provides
a competitive advantage. We continue to take advantage
of the evolving market post the ELD deadline, with our ELD
being rated number one by users on ELDratings.com. We have
engaged third party telemarketing for commencement in May
2019.
In addition to those investments, our strong business momentum continued as evidenced
through these achievements:
• We welcomed a wealth of new customers that have included St
John Ambulance Services, Linfox, Fliway, Coca Cola Amatil NZ
Ltd, and our first enterprise customer in North America.
• Our existing customers remained loyal, giving us an industry-
leading customer retention rate of 98%, due to the benefits our
system delivers to their business. Benefits that enable them to
improve service to their own customers, as well as improve the
safety of those driving on our roads.
• We continued to receive international recognition. In the past
year we appeared in the Deloitte Fast 50 Master of Growth and
the Fast 500 for Asia Pacific. We received the prestigious Brake
Fleet Safety Award acknowledging EROAD’s positive impact
in creating safer drivers, vehicles and roads. We collected the
Exporter of the Year to the USA ($1m to $10m category) at the
American Chamber of Commerce in New Zealand AmCham
DHL Express Success & Innovation Awards. We are a finalist in
the EXPORTNZ Company of the Year, recognizing success by
net return to the New Zealand economy, as well as a finalist
for EXPORTNZ Intellectual Property Excellence in Innovation,
recognizing success in developing and commercializing
innovation in international markets. Winners of those two
awards will be announced in June.
There is an increasing deficit in infrastructure funding with the shift to more fuel efficient
and alternate fuel source vehicles. By March 2019, EROAD technology had collected
NZ$2.5B on behalf of NZTA for the sustainability of the NZ transport network.
• Our relationships with those researching or trialling road
funding or safety regulations have continued to expand
throughout the year. EROAD is now represented on two of
North America’s Transportation Research Board committees.
These draw on international research expertise to solve complex
transport problems, and accordingly membership is only
extended to those considered top in their fields. Our analytical
data research is circulated by the Australian Research Institute.
• Our staff (affectionately referred to as EROADers) are
welcomed into the US Senate, Australian State and Federal
government as well as both local and central government
departments in NZ for discussions on how our technology
can enable safer roads as well as the sustainable funding of
transport networks.
• EROADers have been invited to present at transport,
infrastructure, technology and safety conferences across all
three of our markets. These are all testament to the depth of
talent that exists within our staff, and I am so very proud of
what they collectively achieve.
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019
EXECUTIVE TEAM
16
EXECUTIVE TEAM
17
STEVEN NEWMAN • CEO / Director
Steven has led and inspired the organisation since 2007. Previously Steven co-founded Navman
where his COO and CEO roles provided the opportunity for him to establish Navman as a
leading international brand within the Marine Electronics, Fleet Tracking, Precision GPS Modules
and Consumer Car Navigation sectors.
ALEX BALL • Chief Financial Officer
Alex joined EROAD in January 2019 and is responsible for delivering a competitive business that
delivers shareholder value. His previous roles include CFO at some of NZ’s largest companies
including Transpower, TelstraClear and Vector as well as working for a leading accountancy firm
here and overseas.
JARRED CLAYTON • Chief Technology Officer
Jarred leads product, design and engineering at EROAD and is responsible for ensuring that
our technology strategy is future-focused and solves customer problems. He has held several
leadership roles since joining EROAD back in 2008, bringing extensive leadership experience
gained in product and consulting companies in the UK, America and Australia.
MATT DALTON • EVP Operations
Matt joined EROAD in March 2019 to focus on delivering cohesive operational procedures across
EROAD’s global markets for both supply chain and business systems. Matt was previously at
Yellow New Zealand.
NORM ELLIS • President North America
Norm joined EROAD in 2017 to lead our North American business. He was previously COO at ID
Systems, Inc., a producer of wireless asset management systems for the transport sector. Prior to
that he led sales, services and marketing for Omnitracs in the US and Canada for nearly 17 years.
PIP GILBERT • EVP Strategy
Pip is responsible for framing the strategic choices and challenging the status-quo to drive
EROAD’s long term success. She has held both strategy and product leadership roles since
joining EROAD in 2016. Previously, Pip led innovation, partnerships and strategy at The Icehouse
and brings a strong background in customer insight and market research.
MARK HEINE • EVP General Counsel and Company Secretary
As General Counsel and Company Secretary, Mark works with the team on all aspects of
company and product legal compliance and data privacy. Mark joined EROAD in 2015 after a
legal career working at Bell Gully in Auckland and Allens in Sydney.
MIKE SWEET • Chief People Officer
Mike joined EROAD in January 2019 to lead people and culture development. His global HR
work experience includes NZ, Australia, the UK and the USA. His strong affinity for software
and technology sees him providing strategic HR advice to some of NZ’s leading tech growth
companies. Mike’s most recent role was General Manager HR at Spark.
GENEVIEVE TEARLE • Chief Marketing Officer
Genevieve joined EROAD in October 2018 and is responsible for developing capabilities in
marketing strategy, demand generation, and product marketing management. She has
previously held key marketing roles in global corporates like Philips and Fisher & Paykel, working
across Europe, Asia, and Americas in both B2C and B2B environments.
TONY WARWOOD • General Manager Australia & New Zealand
Tony leads our ANZ business, delivering great customer service and business growth both
sides of the Tasman. He joined EROAD with our first customers back in 2009, having previously
worked in the heavy transport industry.
TOP (left to right) Matt Dalton, Norm Ellis,
Tony Warwood, Steven Newman, Alex Ball, Pip Gilbert
BOTTOM (left to right) Mike Sweet, Jarred Clayton,
Mark Heine, Genevieve Tearle
EXECUTIVE
TEAM
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
18
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
19
S
T
H
G
I
L
H
G
H
I
I
L
A
C
N
A
N
I
F
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS: ANZ
20
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS: ANZ
21
Key Achievements
8000% record
retention
+19%
Growth in Units in ANZ
8,000+
RECORD RENEWALS
Units renewed
(of which 3,000+ upgraded to Gen 2)
46%
HT RUC $ IS COLLECTED
through EROAD technology in New Zealand
$27.3m
EBITDA
Launched
Fringe Benefit Tax
EROAD Product in Australia
Australian
Market Re-launch
Initial re-launch initiatives according to plan
AUSTRALIA &
NEW ZEALAND
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS: NEW ZEALAND
22
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS: NEW ZEALAND
23
New Zealand
• ANZ EBITDA of $27.3m
• Continued solid growth in the SMB run-rate business.
• Largest customers continue to get larger. Approximately 40% of
EROAD’s customer base in NZ is now classified as enterprise.
• Light vehicle and asset tracking opportunities continue to grow,
reflecting Health & Safety regulatory trends and customers
recognising the commercial benefits of telematics.
• High number of renewals (8k+) and upgrades (3k+) to second
generation hardware.
• NZ generates significant operating cash flows which funds R&D
investment and expansion of newer markets.
Go-to Market Summary
1
Grow through retention
and account expansion
2
Continue expansion into
safety conscious market
3
Leverage network into
new opportunities
• Provide upgrade pathways and value
added services to increase lifetime
value.
• Future product releases focused on
next generation experiences.
• Leveraging our ease of use, reliability
and market penetration.
• Continue to amplify demand
generation.
• Leverage new and existing
partnerships to increase sales across
their customer bases.
• EROAD will consider opportunities
to create and/or obtain innovative /
complementary product offerings.
• Develop new products and services
using network insights and in
collaboration with our customers and
stakeholders.
40%
EROAD’s customer base
classified as enterprise
54%
all HT RUC Licences
issued through EROAD
EROAD fleet tracking
is fantastic. It’s creating
more and more
information that’s really
beneficial to our fleet.
Crown Relocations • New Zealand
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS: AUSTRALIA
24
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS: AUSTRALIA
25
Australia
EROAD re-launched into the
Australian market in October 2018
Progressing to plan
Market Opportunity
•
•
Investments made to establish a solid
foundation, including a comprehensive
market review.
• Chain of Responsibility regulatory changes
driving higher adoption rates for telematics
in Australia.
Initial hires into Australian based
sales team.
• Testimonials are highly referenceable
trans-Tasman.
• Australian FBT and posted speed
products launched.
• Australian marketing campaigns and
lead generating activity commenced.
• Management is encouraged by
early interest and pipeline.
• EROAD is leveraging capabilities and
resources in its NZ business, requiring
significantly lower market entry investment.
Go-to Market Summary
1
Build sustainable
run-rate business in SMB
space
• Focused on under served market
segments with product-market fit.
• Near term product releases focussed on
high value opportunities to deliver ROI.
• Leveraging our accuracy, ease of use
and reliability.
2
Pursue selective
enterprise opportunities
3
Manage cost base for
efficiencies in growth
• Leverage NZ reference accounts
• Leverage NZ operations to accelerate
into parent companies and areas of
industry strength.
an efficient operating model.
• Amplify leading service and support.
• Position EROAD to take advantage of
rapidly evolving compliance burden on
businesses that operate fleets.
AU CUSTOMER QUOTE
EROAD has made
us more proactive in
keeping the trucks
safe. Maintenance is
simpler to manage
and we’re able to
keep on top of things
a lot more easily.
Conroy Removals • Australia
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS: NORTH AMERICA
26
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS: NORTH AMERICA
27
Key Achievements
+40%
Growth in NA Units
EBITDA Positive
NA positively contributing to group
EBITDA & operating cash flows
First Enterprise
Account Win
Approx. 4.9k units
signed in March 2019
Refined
Geo-vertical Focus
Focussing sales, marketing
and R&D investment
Strengthened Local
Management
Strengthened local management
team to drive further growth
#1 Rated ELD
by users on ELDratings.com
and #2 by independent reviewer
NORTH
AMERICA
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS: NORTH AMERICA
28
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS: NORTH AMERICA
29
North America
• Achieved 20k unit milestone in August 2018.
• EROAD’s US business is now producing positive operating
cash flow and EBITDA on a monthly basis.
• First significant enterprise fleet signed – one of the largest
privately owned fleets in North America, requiring approx.
4,900 units (full benefits will be realised in FY20). This
expands our addressable market beyond our market entry
target of <200 vehicles per fleet.
• We continued to grow the underlying SMB run-rate
business through a more focussed geo-vertical go-to-market
strategy.
• Future potential enterprise opportunities will be evaluated
to ensure there is strong product and customer fit.
• EROAD is playing selectively in the US AOBRD to ELD
transition (required by Dec 2019) where there is a strong
product fit and limited bespoke R&D development necessary.
Go-to Market Summary
1
Build sustainable
run-rate business in
SMB space
• Tightly focussed geo-vertical approach.
• Near term product releases dictated by
geographic and vertical focus.
• Leveraging our accuracy, ease of use
and reliability.
• Establishing our demand generation
framework.
• Third party telemarketing.
2
Pursue selective
enterprise opportunities
3
Consider strategic
growth opportunities
• Large enterprise account win provides
strong reference account for larger
prospects.
• Selectively targeting enterprises, only
where a close fit exists with minimal
requirements for customisation.
• During 1H19, actively pursued target
which didn’t eventuate following detailed
due diligence.
• EROAD will continue to consider
inorganic growth opportunities to
broaden customer base or introduce
innovative and complimentary offerings.
AU CUSTOMER QUOTE
With EROAD, we are saving a few thousand dollars per month in administrative
time for fuel tax reporting and realizing fuel tax savings of at least $200,000
annually based on the ability to accurately capture and track off road mileage.
EROAD data has also led to a 7% reduction in insurance premiums and savings of
$3,000 per month with its inspection and maintenance recordkeeping capabilities,
as well as fewer violations and lower fines. Overall, the ROI for us on EROAD is
almost immediate.
Beyond providing capabilities for tracking, compliance and a range of functions,
EROAD generates detailed reports that lead to monumental operational benefits
for us. While the system is the source of better productivity and compliance in
our operation at a lower cost, EROAD, more than any of the 12 other suppliers we
evaluated, was willing to work with us to build a customized solution that meets
our specific needs.
Recoil Oilfield Services • USA
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS: CORPORATE
30
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS: CORPORATE
31
Corporate
•
EROAD’s continued growth in international footprint and scale of operations has
led to investing in strengthening management capability, improving processes
and business systems to support future growth.
• This investment in increased executive capability has seen several highly
experienced senior managers join the business during FY2019.
• As outlined in the FY2018 capital raising, EROAD has commenced an ongoing
programme of implementing new business systems to enable it to scale more
efficiently, improve the customer experience and simplify operational processes,
drive greater leverage of operating expenses. An element of upfront costs
relating to this project were incurred as operating expenses prior to the full
capital project commencing.
• The FY2018 capital raising also outlined plans to increase the level of R&D
spend and this has increased on the prior year reflecting the growing number of
products and services provided by the business and growth into new markets.
In addition, FY2019 saw an increased proportion of this spend being expensed
rather than capitalised.
• EROAD continues to keep an active interest in inorganic growth opportunities
that add value to the group through additional subscriber base, complementary
technology or improved distribution. During FY2019 EROAD incurred a level of
costs investigating a significant opportunity that ultimately did not progress.
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019ABOUT EROAD
32
ABOUT EROAD
33
T
U
O
B
A
D
A
O
R
E
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019ABOUT EROAD
34
ABOUT EROAD
35
HEALTH & SAFETY
Complexity made simple through EROAD’s one platform
EROAD’s in-vehicle telematics solution (EHUBO) collects data from the vehicle which is then transmitted via a
secure cellular link and appears in a cloud-based web portal (Depot), for customer access and easy reporting
LEADERBOARD
DRIVER
INSIGHT
REGULATORY
+
COMMERCIAL
Vehicle Records
Automatically
generate and
submit required
trip data as well as
integrated DVIR
reporting
Driver Management
Useful information
directly to drivers
that helps reduce
speed, harsh braking
and incidents.
Health & Safety
Detailed reports
on individual driving
behaviours, safety
incidents and trends
for objective
data-driven coaching.
Road Funding
EROAD’s superior
accuracy and
reliability is why
government agencies
accept reports
generated
through our systems.
Fleet
Management
Reduce your driving
costs and improve
service levels across
any vehicle, fleet
size or industry.
Vehicle Health
Service Record
History & Outsourced
Repair Service Access
Communication
Our systems
were designed
to reduce
paperwork,
making them
really easy to use.
Data Analytics
We believe the
people who use the
roads, should
influence the design,
management
and funding of the
roads.
CONTINUOUS
INNOVATION
We continually launch
innovative products and
services that meet the
needs of our customers
and stakeholders.
CHAIN OF
RESPONSIBILITY
INTEGRATED
DVIR WORKFLOW
SPEED
MONITORING
SAFETY EVENT
MONITORING
FLEET MANAGEMENT
FLEET MANAGEMENT
DAILY FLEET
ACTIVITY
GEOFENCE
SITE ACTIVITY
EROAD
SHARE
TRIP
INVESTIGATOR
FUEL
MANAGEMENT
IDLE
REPORT
E-TRACK
WIRED
PROOF OF
SERVICE
SERVICE
RECORD HISTORY
OUTSOURCED REPAIR
SERVICE ACCESS
PARTNER
INTEGRATIONS
DAILY DRIVER
ACTIVITY
SERVICE SCHEDULING
AND ALERTS
COMPLIANCE
COMPLIANCE
EASY-TO-USE
ELD
IFTA
EASY FILE
DRIVER
CERTIFICATIONS
FRINGE
BENEFIT TAX
COMPLIANCE
IFTA FUEL
TRIP RECORDS
ELECTRONIC
IRP
ELECTRONIC
LOGBOOK
AUTO RUC
OFF-ROAD
CLAIMS
ELECTRONIC
OREGON WMT
ELECTRONIC
OREGON RUAF
2009 / Launch
2019 / Present
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019Regulatory History
36
EROAD growth timeline
37
1978
Road User Charges (RUC) legislation was
implemented to collect road funding from vehicles not
paying petrol tax. This was supplemented by further
legislation requiring regular vehicle safety inspections
(Warrant of Fitness or Certificate of Fitness) and
enforced by NZ Police. Drivers would record their
odometers manually on paper forms.
2007
EROAD is commercially founded
EHUBO, EROAD’s electronic
distance recorder obtains patent
and field trials commence in NZ
2008
McCarthy’s becomes
EROADs first customer
with multiple units
2009
EROAD introduces the world’s first
nationwide, GPS based electronic
road user charging (ERUC) system
2010
MoT approves EHUBO, making this NZ’s
first approved electronic distance recorder
EROAD wins its first awards for business
and technology
2012
EROAD undertakes first North
American commercial pilot of a
GPS based road charging platform
2016
Health and Safety at Work Act (HSW Act) came in
to effect placing greater responsibility on
organisational leaders. The purpose of this act is to
reduce New Zealand’s workplace injury and death
toll by 25 per cent by 2020
2009
EROAD delivers a significant
technology milestone proving it is
feasible to introduce road charging
across an entire jurisdiction
without intrusive and expensive
roadside infrastructure
2010
NZ Legislation permits use of electronic
distance recorder. This replaced manual
odometer recording with GNSS-based
distance recording or, for heavy vehicles,
mechanical hubodometers
2012
RUC legislation is
reviewed establishing
greater accountability,
better governance and
reporting processes
2017
EROAD launches USA’s first independently verified
FMCSA registered electronic logging device (ELD)
EROAD selected as sole heavy vehicle technology
provider for USA’s first multi-state RUC pilot
More than 50% of NZ’s heavy vehicle RUC is being
collected electronically
2016
Second generation product launched (EHUBO2)
EROAD chosen as sole heavy vehicle technology
provider for California Road Charge Pilot
EROAD opens sales office in Christchurch, NZ
2015
EROAD electronic IFTA service
launched into North America
EROAD becomes largest channel for
collection of heavy vehicle eRUC in NZ
2014
EROAD launches commercial services into
North America and Australia, establishing
a US office in Portland, Oregon
EROAD launches first electronic Weight
Mile Tax service (USA)
EROAD lists on New Zealand Stock
Exchange, trading as ERD
EROAD’s electronic log book first to be
approved by NZTA
2013
EROAD reaches 100 staff (affectionately
referring to themselves as EROADers)
EROAD makes its first appearance in the
Deloitte Technology Fast500 for AsiaPacific
EROAD electronic weight-mile tax solution
receives independent unqualified opinion from
Oregon Secretary of State Audits Division
2018
80% of NZ’s heavy vehicle ERUC is collected using EROAD technology
EROAD develops the analytical model ‘Dynamic Data’, enabling transport planners
to use real (instead of modelled) data for transport network design and evaluation
EROAD opens product refurbishment factory in Penrose, NZ
250 EROADers located across three markets (NZ, North America & Australia)
EHUBO2.2 the revised unit with 4G capacity, launches
2018
Total Electronic RUC collection
overtakes paper collection
2019
EROAD sales reach 100,000 units
EROAD comes of age, gaining enterprise accounts in all markets (NZ, North America & Australia)
EROAD office refurbishment of Albany offices creates Global/ANZ HQ based in Albany, Auckland NZ
2019
Approx 750,000 vehicles pay road taxes through RUC, including 600,000 light vehicles. Light electric
vehicles are currently exempt until December 2021, heavy electric vehicles are exempt until December 2025
RUC administration is now more electronic than paper-based: 50% of HT RUC Dollars, 67% of HT Licenses,
and 51% of HT KMs travelled, are all recorded electronically
Funding delivered through RUC continues to increase year on year. Since launching, more than NZ$2.5
billion RUC funding has been collected through EROAD technology
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019ABOUT EROAD
38
ABOUT EROAD
39
Health and Safety
Health and Safety has been at the core of our values since our
inception as a company and remains a key area of focus for us in
terms of product development, competency development and
company culture.
Health and Safety and Chain of Responsibility regulatory developments in New Zealand and
Australia have further resulted in us building a suite of products and services that support
health and safety regulatory compliance, reporting, and driver safety.
The introduction of Drive Buddy, Virtual Speed Camera, Driver Leaderboard, electronic
logbook, and vehicle monitoring all aid compliance reporting, and have resulted in reductions
in overspeed events in our customers’ fleets.
Driver Login and Posted Speed have both been enabled by the in-vehicle telematics device
we developed (Ehubo2) which provides information to drivers that has been shown to reduce
speed, harsh braking and safety incidents through in vehicle feedback to the driver.
New Zealand reduction in speed
Driver Leaderboard TM
Driver Login TM
Posted Speed TM
SPEED EVENTS
47%
Overspeed Dashboard TM
Drive Buddy TM
)
m
k
0
0
1
r
e
p
s
t
n
e
v
e
(
y
c
n
e
u
q
e
r
F
The above graph shows the reduction in over speed events
over time as product enhancements have been added.
The EROAD installation was the easiest and
most successful vehicle technology roll out
in to the St. John fleet.
This was due to the flexibility of EROAD, their
structured approach and their seamless work,
with our Infrastructure Managers and Install
Co-ordinators.
Ehubo2: Driver Login
Depot: Driver Leaderboard
Our SaaS software solution further contributes to enabling safety outcomes in our customer
fleets. Driver Leaderboard in Depot enables our customers to have driver coaching
conversations with their drivers to improve driver safety outcomes. It provides a means by
which good performance can be rewarded by employers, and training and support can be
provided where necessary.
Internally, our safety and wellbeing professionals play a key role in delivering health and safety
programmes and providing expertise and support to EROAD’s operations in New Zealand,
North America and Australia. EROAD’s safety risk assessment process brings focus to safety,
driving a reduction in injuries and stress through a continual focus on the mental and physical
safety of our employees. Our safety and wellbeing professionals also work with our customers
to aid in the design of their safety processes in a continuous improvement approach to
improving safety outcomes both at EROAD and across our customers operations.
In 2018 EROAD received the Brake Fleet Safety Award acknowledging EROAD’s positive
impact in creating safer drivers, vehicles and roads.
Leaderboard gives us all the names of the
drivers and how they perform through the week.
I keep a record of it so I can see how I perform
and how other drivers perform – because I’m
involved with their health and safety.
It’s all about driving safely and getting home
safely. That’s why you should have EROAD.
St. John • EROAD Customer, New Zealand
Machinery Movers • EROAD Customer, New Zealand
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019
ABOUT EROAD
40
ABOUT EROAD
41
Sizeable decline in over-speed events with customers
who have actively implemented ‘Safe Driver’
Foodstuffs North Island: Owner Drivers
Average number of speeding events per 100km travelled
TIL Freight: Average number of speeding events per 100km travelled
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
5
4
3
2
1
EHUBO2 SAFE DRIVER
upgrade plan commenced
SPEED EVENTS
83%
2.6
2.4
2.2
2.0
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
EHUBO2 SAFE DRIVER
upgrade plan commenced
SPEED EVENTS
89%
immediately after installation
Jan 2017
Jul 2017
Jan 2018
Jul 2018
Jan 2019
Jul 2017
Jan 2018
Jul 2018
Jan 2019
Foodstuffs North Island: Company owned vehicles
Average number of speeding events per 100km travelled
EHUBO2 SAFE DRIVER
upgrade plan commenced
SPEED EVENTS
85%
and consistently sit below 0.3 events per 100km
Jan 2017
Jul 2017
Jan 2018
Jul 2018
Jan 2019
EROAD has so far brought down our over
speed events from approximately 25,000
a month to about 1200.
It’s reduced our overall fuel bill by
approximately 20% and accident incident
rates by 20%.
McConnell Dowell • EROAD Customer, New Zealand
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019ABOUT EROAD
42
ABOUT EROAD
43
Using big data for safer roads
Our data and analytics team, working collaboratively with Oregon State University, has
created a new data algorithm called Dynamic Risk, using real data (as opposed to modelled
data). This will enable transport authorities to make efficiently informed spending decisions to
improve road safety.
Driver behaviour gathered from over 9.5 million trips and collected through EROAD
technology was anonymized, aggregated then analysed through an innovative algorithm that
has resulted in a new way of accurately identifying risk.
“We wanted to create a model that could predict where crashes were most likely to occur
so that preventative measures could be implemented before those areas became known as
high-crash risk areas” said EROAD’s Director of Analytics Gareth Robins. “When compared
to traditional methods of risk analyses, our technology and new algorithm is an efficient and
effective way of comparing multiple factors gathered from a range of vehicle types, unlocking
information previously unavailable on how our roads are being driven”.
The research was conducted using data from New Zealand and looked at fatigue, frustration
and familiarity, then compared these factors across the five classes of New Zealand roads.
Varying Drive Times
Varying Risk
23.9%
less distance
45.8%
higher risk of traffic incident
When choosing to travel between Rotorua and Taupo one route has 23.9% less distance but
exposes the driver to 45.8% higher risk of being involved in a traffic incident (indicated by red
on the map).
Sustainability
The data insights provided by EROAD help our customers achieve
greater fuel efficiency, subsequently reducing emissions.
EROAD’s fleet management solution compares fuel records and displays average and total idle
time by vehicle enabling conversations with drivers around reducing idle times, and inefficient
fuel usage. By monitoring idle events and tracking driver behaviour, we not only provide
our customers with improvements to their bottom line but also help lessen their businesses’
impact on the environment.
During 2018 we moved to outsourced manufacturing, moving our production to the
Philippines. This process involved extensive evaluation of manufacturing options, with
consideration given to their treatment of employees in line with our values, track records on
human rights, and sustainability of their operations.
Our chosen manufacturing partner, IMI Engineering, supports the Carbon Disclosure Project
(“CDP”) climate change initiative and submits annual CDP reports showing their continued
reduction in C02 emissions. In addition to this, since 2017 they have reduced their scrap levels
by 67% and are committed to effective engineering solutions that minimise their impact on
the environment.
REMANUFACTURING:
We closely follow the Ministry for the Environment’s recommended guidance for collection,
reuse and recycling of electrical and electronic equipment (EEE). We, therefore, remanufacture
EEE to the extent possible and with minimal waste, thereby offsetting what must be
extracted from the environment. We use reputable partners to recycle EEE that could not be
remanufactured, ensuring absolute integrity and efficiency of the recycling process.
Within the last financial year we began recycling electronic waste (since 4 April 2018). Since
then we have reclaimed:
• 287 kg of LiSOCl2 batteries
• 48 kg of PCB Boards
On average we now remanufacture/refurbish 1500 units per month using recycled
components. Where possible we re-use/re-cycle our cartons, especially our outers, both in our
production facility, and at our sales locations.
REDUCED USE OF FOSSIL FUELS
Less fossil fuels used, less CO2 into our environment. We have improved our supply chain to
reduce our reliance on international freight. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, more than half of the air pollution in the USA comes from vehicles. Our products and
services enable our customers to move their vehicles more efficiently, which is why they use
less fuel after installing EHUBO2 in their vehicles.
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019ABOUT EROAD
44
ABOUT EROAD
45
Heather Woodruff
Customer Success & Service Manager
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019ABOUT EROAD
46
ABOUT EROAD
47
We love what we do – delivering
our customers and community safer
roads, better environmental outcomes
and commercial advantage.
To deliver on our 3-5 year strategy plan we have designed a scalable organisation with the
right skill-sets to grow and mature the company in new markets and geographies. We have
bolstered our leadership team with new executive level members and key appointments to
deepen marketing, sales, finance, product and R&D capability, as well as establish leadership
teams for each country. We are investing heavily to develop future leaders across the business
to ensure excellent bench strength for our future growth.
GENDER SPLIT
Female 39%
Male 61%
31%
Female
EROAD’s
wider
leadership
team
WOMEN AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE WORKFORCE
23%
Technology
Sector
39%
EROAD
AGE SPLIT
7%
Under 25
37%
26-35
26%
36-45
30%
Over 46
Sarah Thompson
VP Product
All figures are employees (no contractors included)
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019ABOUT EROAD
48
ABOUT EROAD
49
197
New Zealand
57
5
US
Australia
We have over
250 staff
located across
our three markets.
All figures are employees
(no contractors included)
EROADer
Location
91
new employees
joined us in FY19
EROADers come
from more than
35
c ountrie
s
a
r
o
u
n
d
t
h
e
w
orld
Ken Eyre
Senior Manager – Product Support & Fulfillment
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019
ABOUT EROAD
50
ABOUT EROAD
51
SUPPORTIVE CULTURE
We maintain a supportive culture through company events, the social
committee, reward and recognition programmes and family-friendly
company policies such as flexible working and parental leave.
• Our employee engagement survey shows
that 84% of staff are proud to work for
EROAD and would recommend it as a great
place to work.
• Our culture is orientated around inclusion,
underpinned by a formal D&I strategy
and a high emphasis on our values.
Wellbeing is a positive and daily focus.
2/3 of employees are engaged in a three
month walkathon; we’re operating global
“Lean-in” development circles; frequent
walking meetings; an active volunteering
and social calendar and an employee driven
recognition program.
• Our teams enjoy flexible working, personal
choice technology and fruit and social
activities in the office.
• We provide our people with opportunities
to volunteer in the community and make a
real difference to those in need.
• A major refurbishment of our global and
ANZ headquarters was completed in March
2019. This has created a modern working
environment that supports agile working.
North America
New Zealand
Truckers
Against Trafficking
Habitat for
Humanity (2 days)
Oregon Food
Bank (2 days)
Gumboot Friday
I am hope
Shore and Dive Cleanup
Pink Shirt Day
We have volunteered
and supported
Auckland City Mission (2x)
Gardening Therapy
Eat My Lunch
Jyothi Madanlal
Software Engineer
Building houses with Habitat for Humanity
Portland, Oregon, USA
Shore and Dive Cleanup
Auckland, New Zealand
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019ABOUT EROAD
52
ABOUT EROAD
53
EROAD GLOBAL HEAD OFFICE
AND ANZ HEADQUARTERS
Auckland, New Zealand
A major refurbishment of our global headquarters located in Albany,
Auckland, to ensure a modern space that supports a range of flexible working
styles, enhances collaboration and allows EROADers to work their magic.
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019ABOUT EROAD
54
ABOUT EROAD
55
GRADUATE PROGRAMMES
We recognise that the company’s future rests
with the next generation of engineers, product
owners and other talented professionals. We
help prepare young people to pursue these
disciplines by offering graduate programmes
and internships, realising two Graduates and
five Interns during FY19.
LEARNING AND LEADERSHIP
We run programmes that encourage lifelong
learning, identify and develop our next
generation of leaders, and ensure that experts
in their fields share their knowledge with
others.
• Our approach to work is designed to foster
our entrepreneurial spirit. We celebrate
innovation with both a formal program
as well as the ability for employees to
recognize each other with awards.
• We use technology to enable cross
market collaboration, linking our teams in
borderless working.
Soumya Puri
Project Manager
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019AUDITOR’S REPORT
56
AUDITOR’S REPORT
57
’
S
R
O
T
I
D
U
A
T
R
O
P
E
R
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019 © 2019 KPMG, a New Zealand partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Independent Auditor’s Report To the shareholders of EROAD Limited Report on the consolidated financial statements Opinion In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial statements of EROAD Limited (the company) and its subsidiaries (the Group) on pages 63 to 104: i. present fairly in all material respects the Group’s financial position as at 31 March 2019 and its financial performance and cash flows for the year ended on that date; and ii. comply with New Zealand Equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements which comprise: — the consolidated statement of financial position as at 31 March 2019; — the consolidated statement of comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for the year then ended; and — notes, including a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information. Basis for opinion We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (‘ISAs (NZ)’). We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. We are independent of the Group in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 (Revised) Code of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners issued by the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board and the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants’ Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (IESBA Code), and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements and the IESBA Code. Our responsibilities under ISAs (NZ) are further described in the auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the Group financial statements section of our report. Our firm has also provided other services to the Group in relation to tax compliance, tax advisory and corporate finance. Subject to certain restrictions, partners and employees of our firm may also deal with the Group on normal terms within the ordinary course of trading activities of the business of the Group. These matters have not impaired our independence as auditor of the Group. The firm has no other relationship with, or interest in, the Group. Scoping The scope of our audit is designed to ensure that we perform adequate work to be able to give an opinion on the Group financial statements as a whole, taking into account the structure of the Group, the financial reporting systems, processes and controls, and the industry in which it operates. AUDITOR’S REPORT
58
AUDITOR’S REPORT
59
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019 The context for our audit is set by the Group’s major activities in the financial year ended 31 March 2019. The Group’s finance function is located at the head office in Auckland and in the USA office in Oregon. All audit work in respect of the consolidated financial statements was performed by the Group engagement team. Materiality The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. Materiality helped us to determine the nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures and to evaluate the effect of misstatements, both individually and on the Group financial statements as a whole. The materiality for the Group financial statements as a whole was set at $580,000 determined with reference to a benchmark of Group revenue. We chose the benchmark because, in our view, this is a key measure of the Group’s performance. Key audit matters Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the Group’s consolidated financial statements in the current period. We summarise below those matters and our key audit procedures to address those matters in order that the shareholders as a body may better understand the process by which we arrived at our audit opinion. Our procedures were undertaken in the context of and solely for the purpose of our statutory audit opinion on the Group financial statements as a whole and we do not express discrete opinions on separate elements of the Group financial statements. The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit Revenue Recognition ($61.3m) Refer to Note 3 of the consolidated financial statements. The majority of the Group’s contracts are accounted for as a service contract under NZ IFRS 15. We focused on this area because the accounting determination of whether or not the contract contains a lease has a significant impact on the recognition of profit and loss and balance sheet. The contracts do not meet the definition of a lease under NZ IFRS 16. These customer contracts are deemed not to represent a lease of the eHUBO unit because EROAD’s customers do not have the right to direct the use of the asset and therefore do not have the right to control the use of the eHUBO unit. This is a significant judgement under NZ IFRS 16. We assessed the judgement in revenue recognition by: — Assessing the Group’s revenue recognition policy for compliance with the relevant accounting requirements; — Selecting a sample of contracts during the year and agreeing the sample to the contract terms and assessing the contractual terms against the NZ IFRS 15 & 16 recognition requirements; — Reviewing any changes or new contractual terms and conditions entered into with new customers during the period, and consideration of the potential impact on revenue recognition applied; — Checking a sample of customer invoices immediately prior to and after year end to confirm the service start date of the contract is line with the NZ IFRS 15 & 16 requirements and; — Challenging management’s conclusions that the customer contracts do not meet the definition of a lease under NZ IFRS 16 and are therefore, accounted for as a service contract under NZ IFRS 15 and NZ IFRS 16. We did not identify any matters that indicated that the reported revenue is materially misstated. Development asset capitalisation and impairment ($29.8m) The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit Refer to note 16 of the consolidated financial statements. The Group has reported a development asset of $29.8m (2018: $26.8m). This investment requires significant judgement as to whether the largely internal costs should be expensed or capitalised, and assessing the indicators of impairment. We focused on this area due to the quantum of the development costs capitalised. The Group’s process for calculating the amount of internally developed platform costs to be capitalised is judgmental and involves estimating the hours which staff spend developing software and determining the costs attributable to that time. The Directors have assessed whether any impairment indicators existed for each major development asset by considering, among other factors, sales achieved to date and the overall operating and cash performance of the entity. Indicators of impairment were identified in the US operations and the Group performed an impairment test of the development assets on a value in use basis. This assessment requires judgment when forecasting future sales and the related cash flows, including considering the difficulties in achieving current year budgeted sales levels for US market. We assessed the judgement related to the internal costs capitalised by: — Understanding the nature and background of the activities that are capitalised through inquiry of the key operational, financial, legal, and engineering personnel; — Challenging whether costs capitalised during the year comply with the accounting requirements; and — Assessing the reasonableness of the amount of internal costs capitalised based on the hours which staff spend developing software plus attributable costs. We assessed management’s impairment testing of the development asset by obtaining the supporting model and assessing the methodology and key assumptions made including: — Confirming our understanding of the US telematics industry and country specific regulation obtained during our visit to the EROAD Oregon operations through interviews held with relevant members of the US management team. — Reconfirming the external advice management has obtained in respect of the market strategy to be adopted in the US through discussions with management to confirm our understanding of the operation’s strategy. — Using our corporate finance experts to challenge and assess the appropriateness and mathematical accuracy of management’s impairment models well as the reasonableness of key inputs such as weighted average cost of capital and long term growth weights. — Challenging management’s future cash flow forecasts. This included comparing previous forecasts to actual results and other relevant supporting documentation such as sales pipelines (to evidence the feasibility of the forecasts and to assess the reliability of historical forecasting). — We challenged management’s forecasts by performing sensitivity analysis over the forecasted sales volumes, discount rate, and expenses. This enabled us to ascertain the extent of change in those assumptions required to result in an impairment of the development assets. We did not identify any factors that indicated that management’s overall conclusions were not supportable. Deferred Tax Asset ($7.5m) Refer to note 10 of the consolidated financial statements. The Group has a net deferred tax asset balance of $7.5m, of which $9.3m relates to deferred tax assets arising from past tax losses. We focused on the deferred tax asset from tax losses Our procedures included the following: — We evaluated the Group’s assessment of whether there would be sufficient taxable profits in future periods to support the carrying value of the deferred tax asset in New Zealand; — We compared the assumptions used in the forecasts of taxable profit to those applied in management’s FY19 budgets; AUDITOR’S REPORT
60
AUDITOR’S REPORT
61
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019 The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit arising in New Zealand as its recoverability is sensitive to the Group’s expected future profitability and its entitlement to offset these losses against future profits. This as a key risk due to the significance of the deferred tax asset to the financial position of the Group and the judgement applied by management in determining the extent to which a deferred tax asset should be recognised. — We challenged the key assumptions in the forecasts presented; — We also considered whether the recognition of additional deferred tax assets in relation to current year tax losses and previously unrecorded losses were in compliance with the relevant accounting requirements; — We examined correspondence with the Inland Revenue Department supporting the calculation of available tax losses; — We used our tax specialists to assess whether the shareholder continuity requirements under New Zealand tax legislation had been maintained in the current financial reporting period. The results of our procedures did not identify any inconsistencies with management’s conclusion that the recognition of unrecognised losses and current year losses meets the criteria for recognition. Other information The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information included in the entity’s Annual Report. Other information includes the Chairman’s Report, Board of Directors, CEO’s Report, Executive Team, Financial Highlights, About EROAD, Corporate Governance, Regulatory Disclosures, Other Information, Glossary and Key Dates and are included in the Annual Report. Our opinion on the Group financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon. In connection with our audit of the Group financial statements our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the Group financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially misstated. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard. Use of this independent auditor’s report This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders as a body. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the shareholders as a body for our audit work, this independent auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed. Responsibilities of the Directors for the consolidated financial statements The Directors, on behalf of EROAD Limited, are responsible for: — the preparation and fair presentation of the Group financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting practice in New Zealand (being New Zealand Equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards) and International Financial Reporting Standards; — implementing necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a Group set of financial statements that is fairly presented and free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and — assessing the ability to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so. Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated financial statements Our objective is: — to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the Group financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and — to issue an independent auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs NZ will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error. They are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these Group financial statements. A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of these Group financial statements is located at the External Reporting Board (XRB) website at: http://www.xrb.govt.nz/standards-for-assurance-practitioners/auditors-responsibilities/audit-report-1/ This description forms part of our independent auditor’s report. The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this independent auditor's report is Ross Buckley For and on behalf of KPMG Auckland 28 May 2019 62
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
63
EROAD LIMITED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 March 2019
Revenue
Operating Expenses
Earnings before interest, taxation, depreciation and amortisation
Depreciation of Property, Plant & Equipment
Amortisation of Intangible Assets
Amortisation of Contract and Customer Acquisition Assets
Earnings/(loss) before interest and taxation
Finance income
Finance expense
Net financing costs
Profit/(loss) before tax
Income tax (expense)/benefit
GROUP
31 March 2019
31 March 2018
Notes
$
$
Restated
3
4
14
16
8
8
9
61,351,896
43,766,496
(45,718,717)
(33,221,446)
15,633,179
10,545,050
(6,621,272)
(5,361,391)
(6,479,134)
(5,594,391)
(4,852,093)
(3,673,129)
(2,319,320)
(4,083,861)
28,884
97,694
(2,815,983)
(1,896,889)
(2,787,099)
(1,799,195)
(5,106,419)
(5,883,056)
191,199
2,426,232
Profit/(loss) from continuing operations
(4,915,220)
(3,456,824)
Profit/(loss) after tax for the year attributable to the shareholders
(4,915,220)
(3,456,824)
Items that are or may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss
Other comprehensive income
(1,120,303)
(196,793)
Total comprehensive income/(loss) for the year
(6,035,523)
(3,653,617)
Earnings per share - Basic (cents)
Earnings per share - Diluted (cents)
11
11
(7.31)
(7.24)
(5.61)
(5.57)
The above Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
I
L
A
C
N
A
N
I
F
EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFINANCIAL STATEMENTSCONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
64
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
65
EROAD LIMITED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
AS AT 31 MARCH 2019
EROAD LIMITED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 March 2019
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted bank accounts
Trade and other receivables
Contract fulfilment costs
Costs to obtain contracts
Current tax receivable
Total Current Assets
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
Property, plant and equipment
Intangible assets
Contract fulfilment costs
Costs to obtain contracts
Deferred tax assets
Total Non-Current Assets
TOTAL ASSETS
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Overdrafts
Borrowings
Trade payables and accruals
Payables to NZTA and ODOT
Current tax payable
Contract liabilities
Lease liabilities
Employee entitlements
Total Current Liabilities
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Borrowings
Contract liabilities
Lease liabilities
Deferred tax liabilities
Total Non-Current Liabilities
TOTAL LIABILITIES
NET ASSETS
EQUITY
Share capital
Translation reserve
Retained earnings
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
12
13
7
7
14
16
7
7
10
12
18
17
19
15
18
19
15
10
11
31 March 2019
31 March 2018
1 April 2017
Notes
$
$
Restated
$
Restated
GROUP
16,138,806
12,672,741
10,502,123
2,424,626
2,163,888
5,301
43,907,485
33,901,289
33,132,285
2,662,943
2,100,079
7,495,496
79,292,092
21,870,415
9,498,071
11,626,419
2,140,135
1,448,655
21,456
46,605,151
23,848,227
29,901,469
2,204,472
1,635,487
6,953,385
64,543,040
935,359
9,208,289
5,519,533
1,482,115
927,327
361,912
18,434,535
17,938,605
28,662,777
2,108,773
935,665
4,367,515
54,013,335
GROUP
Share Capital
Retained Earnings
Translation
Reserve
Notes
$
$
$
Total
$
Balance as at 1 April 2017 as originally presented
58,965,367
(13,066,244)
(343,389)
45,555,734
Adjustment on initial application of NZ IFRS 15,16 & 9
(net of tax)
2
(6,732,853)
5,542
(6,727,311)
Balance as at 1 April 2017 (restated)
58,965,367
(19,799,097)
(337,847)
38,828,423
Profit after tax for the year (restated)
Other comprehensive income
Total comprehensive loss for the year, net of tax
-
-
-
(3,456,824)
(3,456,824)
-
(196,793)
(196,793)
(3,456,824)
(196,793)
(3,653,617)
Equity settled share-based payments
37,818
230,936
-
268,754
Share capital issued
11
21,323,253
21,323,253
123,199,577
111,148,191
72,447,870
Balance at 31 March 2018
80,326,438
(23,024,985)
(534,640)
56,766,813
-
17,162,667
6,111,430
12,488,871
-
5,757,951
782,450
1,338,026
43,641,395
17,476,029
4,209,472
6,246,859
335,025
28,267,385
-
10,574,689
4,859,124
9,439,139
85,245
5,434,881
801,024
1,147,462
32,341,564
15,908,670
4,739,071
1,264,690
127,383
22,039,814
873
-
5,251,971
9,243,383
-
4,569,936
727,406
1,201,002
20,994,571
7,029,304
3,498,971
2,093,192
3,409
12,624,876
Balance as at 31 March 2018 as originally presented
80,326,438
(12,625,692)
(540,182)
67,160,564
Adjustment on initial application of NZ IFRS 15,16 & 9
(net of tax)
-
(10,399,293)
5,542
(10,393,751)
Balance as at 1 April 2018 (restated)
80,326,438
(23,024,985)
(534,640)
56,766,813
Profit after tax for the year
Other comprehensive income
Total comprehesive loss for year - net of tax
-
-
-
(4,915,220)
-
(4,915,220)
-
(1,120,303)
(1,120,303)
(4,915,220)
(1,120,303)
(6,035,523)
Equity settled share-based payments
Share capital issued
94,424
191,561
11
273,522
-
367,946
191,561
Balance at 31 March 2019
80,612,423
(27,666,683)
(1,654,943)
51,290,797
71,908,780
54,381,378
33,619,447
The above Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
51,290,797
56,766,813
38,828,423
80,612,423
(1,654,943)
(27,666,683)
51,290,797
80,326,438
(534,640)
(23,024,985)
56,766,813
58,965,367
(337,847)
(19,799,097)
38,828,423
The above Consolidated Statement of Financial Position should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
Chairman, 28 May 2019
Chair of the Finance, Risk and Audit Committee, 28 May 2019
EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
66
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
67
EROAD LIMITED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 March 2019
EROAD LIMITED
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2019
Cash flows from operating activities
Cash received from customers
Payments to suppliers and employees
Interest received
Interest paid
Tax received
Net cash inflow from operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities
Payments for investment in property, plant & equipment
Payments for investment in intangible assets
Payments for investment in contract fulfilment assets
Payments for investment in customer acquisition assets
Net cash outflow from investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities
Receipts from bank loans
Repayments of bank loans
Repayments of lease liability
Receipts from issue of equity
Payments for costs of raising equity
Net cash inflow from financing activities
GROUP
31 March 2019
31 March 2018
Notes
$
$
Restated
62,269,663
39,810,030
(45,356,635)
(33,061,706)
19,645
13,453
(2,815,983)
(1,896,889)
196,536
14,313,226
340,456
5,205,344
(10,794,313)
(9,709,950)
(3,527,493)
(3,247,387)
(11,315,559)
(6,833,083)
(3,000,865)
(2,647,133)
(27,279,143)
(23,796,640)
23,602,236
(15,446,899)
(921,029)
-
-
23,731,244
(4,277,189)
(754,884)
21,501,711
(673,657)
7,234,308
39,527,225
14
16
18
18
11
Net increase/(decrease) in cash held
(5,731,609)
20,935,929
Cash at beginning of the financial year
21,870,415
934,486
Closing cash and cash equivalents (net of overdrafts)
16,138,806
21,870,415
The above Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
NOTE 1 • SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT GROUP ACCOUNTING POLICIES
EROAD Limited (the “Parent”) is a company domiciled in New Zealand registered under the Companies Act 1993 and listed on
the New Zealand Stock Exchange (NZX) Main Board. The Company is an FMC reporting entity for the purposes of the Financial
Markets Conduct Act 2013 and the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of that Act and
the Financial Reporting Act 2013. The consolidated financial statements comprise EROAD Limited and its subsidiaries (the “Group”).
The Group provides electronic on-board units and software as a service to the transport industry.
The financial statements for the Group are for the year ended 31 March 2019
The financial statements were authorised for issue by the directors on 28 May 2019.
The accounting policies below have been applied consistently to all periods presented in these financial statements.
(a) Basis of preparation
Statement of compliance with IFRS
The consolidated financial statements comprise the following: consolidated statement of comprehensive income, consolidated
statement of changes in equity, consolidated statement of financial position, consolidated statement of cash flows, and accounting
policies and notes to the financial statements contained on pages 62 to 104.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with New Zealand Generally Accepted Accounting
Practice (“NZ GAAP”). They comply with the New Zealand equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards (NZ IFRS)
and other applicable Financial Reporting Standards as appropriate to Tier 1 for-profit entities.
Comparative figures
Where a change in presentation of the financial statements has been made during the period, comparative statements and notes
have been restated to align with current year presentation.
Basis of measurement
The financial statements are prepared on the historical cost basis. Except for certain financial instruments carried at fair value as
described in (g) and (h).
Going concern
The financial statements have been prepared using the going concern assumption.
Presentation currency
The financial statements are presented in New Zealand dollars and all values are rounded to the nearest dollar ($).The functional
currency of EROAD Limited is New Zealand Dollars (NZD).
Use of estimates and judgements
In preparing these consolidated financial statements in conformity with NZ IFRS, management has made judgements, estimates
and assumptions that affect the application of the Group’s accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities,
income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates. Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an
ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimates are revised and in any future
periods affected.
Information about assumptions and estimation uncertainties that have a significant risk of resulting in a material adjustment within
the next financial period are included in the following notes:
Note 3: The Group provides a right to use its hardware assets as part of its contracts with customers. Determining whether the
contract contains a lease as per the definition of NZ IFRS 16, is a significant judgement requiring consideration as to whether the
customer has the right to direct the use of the hardware asset. Historically the company assessed EROAD’s customers as having
physical control of the EROAD unit and therefore a right to use an asset. Under NZ IFRS 16 the company has determined that
EROAD’s customers don’t have the right to direct the use of EROAD’s asset because EROAD continues to have the right and ability
to change how the unit operates during the customer’s contractual term. The Group determined that customers do not have the
right to control the use of its hardware assets and therefore the arrangement does not contain a lease. Therefore the contracts have
been accounted for as a services contract under NZ IFRS 15.
EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
68
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
69
NOTE 1 • SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT GROUP ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
NOTE 1 • SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT GROUP ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
The contracts with customers include promises to provide multiple products and services. Determining whether the products
and services are considered distinct performance obligations that should be accounted for separately versus together requires
significant judgement. The Group provides significant integration services of its hardware assets and installation services when
integrating its software and therefore has accounted for these services as one performance obligation.
Note 10: recognition of deferred tax assets: availability of future taxable profit against which carry forward tax losses can be used.
Note 16: impairment testing for intangible assets, key assumptions underlying recoverable amounts, including the recoverability of
development costs.
(b) Basis of Consolidation
The Group financial statements consolidate the financial statements of subsidiaries using the purchase method of accounting.
Subsidiaries are entities controlled by the Group. The Group controls an entity when it is exposed to, or has rights to, variable
returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the entity. The financial
statements of subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date on which control commences until the
date on which control ceases.
Intra-group balances and transactions, and any unrealised income and expenses arising from intra-group transactions are eliminated.
(c) Business Combinations
The Group accounts for business combinations using the purchase method when control is transferred to the Group. The
consideration transferred in the acquisition is generally measured at fair value, as are the identifiable net assets acquired. Any
goodwill that arises is tested annually for impairment. Any gain on a bargain purchase is recognised in profit or loss immediately.
Transaction costs are expensed as incurred, except if related to the issue of debt or equity securities.
The consideration transferred does not include amounts related to the settlement of pre-existing relationships. Such amounts are
generally recognised in the statement of comprehensive income. Any contingent consideration is measured at fair value at the date
of acquisition. If an obligation to pay contingent consideration that meets the definition of a financial instrument is classified as
equity, then it is not remeasured and settlement is accounted for within equity. Otherwise, subsequent changes in the fair value of
contingent consideration are recognised in equity.
(d) Revenue
Software as a service revenue
The Group generates revenue through the sale of hardware assets, rental of hardware assets, installation of hardware assets and
provision of software services as part of contracts with customers as part of a bundled package. These hardware units enable
customers to access the software platform offered by the Group. The transaction involving hardware and accessories do not
convey a distinct good or service. The sale does not transfer control to the customer as the Group provides a significant service
of integrating the software service to produce a combined output. The sale of the hardware, accessories and software service are
referred to as Software as a Service (SaaS) revenue, which is recognised over time as the customer simultaneously receives and
consumes the benefits of the service. The Group concluded that the customer is expected to benefit from the services evenly over
the period of delivery being the contract period and as a result would recognise revenue on a straight line basis of the contract
period. The Group recognises revenue from the date of installation as this is when the Group deems the service period to begin.
There are no variable consideration terms within the contracts.
The timing of revenue recognition may differ from the timing of invoicing to customers and the receipt of consideration. A contract
liability is recognised where consideration is received in advance of the completion of associated performance obligations. The
contract liability derecognised over time evenly over the period of the contract as the customer derives the benefit evenly from the
services provided over the contract period. The majority of contracts are for 3 years and can be for a term of up to 5 years. As a
result there is a financing component which the group recognise as a finance cost when consideration is received in advance.
The Group offers installation services as part of a number of promises to transfer goods and services within each contract.
Installation services do not convey a distinct good or service and therefore are not a separate performance obligation as the
installation is a set-up activity that does not provide the customer a direct benefit other than access to the software services. As a
result, the installation service is considered as part of the single performance obligation; referred to as Software as a Service (SaaS)
revenue, which includes the software service and hardware sale or rental for which the customer simultaneously receives and
consumes the benefit of the service. Where installation revenue is received in advance of satisfying the performance obligation a
contract liability is recognised. The contract liability derecognised over time evenly over the period of the contract as the customer
derives the benefit evenly from the services provided over the contract period.
The majority of contracts are for 3 years and can be for a term of up to 5. As a result there is a financing component which the
group recognise as a finance cost when consideration is received in advance.
Transaction fees
When the Group acts in the capacity of an agent rather than as the principal in a transaction, the revenue recognised is the net
amount of commission made by the Group.
Capitalised contract fulfillment costs
The Group capitalises incremental costs of fulfilling customer contracts, typically distribution and installation costs. Contract
fulfillment costs are amortised evenly over the period of the contract. The majority of contracts are for 3 years and can be for a term
of up to 5 years.
Capitalised contract acquisition costs
The Group has applied a policy of capitalising only costs that are incremental in obtaining contracts with customers, typically sales
commissions. Contract acquisition costs are amortised evenly over the period of the contract. The majority of contracts are for 3
years and can be for a term of up to 5 years.
(e) Finance income and finance expenses
The Group’s finance income and finance expenses include: interest payable and receivable recognised using the effective interest
rate method, foreign exchange gains and losses.
(f) Taxation
Income tax expense comprises current and deferred tax. Current tax and deferred tax is recognised in profit or loss except to the
extent that it relates to a business combination, or items recognised directly in equity or in other comprehensive income.
Current tax is the expected tax payable or receivable on the taxable income or loss for the period, using tax rates enacted or
substantively enacted at the reporting date, and any adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous periods. Current tax payable
also includes any tax liability arising from the declaration of dividends.
Deferred tax is recognised in respect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial
reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes. Deferred tax is measured at the tax rates that are expected to be
applied to temporary differences when they reverse, based on the laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the
reporting date.
A deferred tax asset is recognised for unused tax losses, tax credits and deductible temporary differences, to the extent that it is
probable that future taxable profits will be available against which they can be utilised. Deferred tax assets are reviewed at each
reporting date and are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realised.
(g) Financial Instruments
Recognition and initial measurement
Trade receivables and debt securities issued are initially recognised when they are originated. All other financial assets and financial
liabilities are initially recognised when the Group becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument.
A financial asset (unless it is a trade receivable without a significant financing component) or financial liability is initially measured
at fair value plus, for an item not at Fair Value through Profit or Loss, transaction costs that are directly attributable to its acquisition
or issue. A trade receivable without a significant financing component is initially measured at the transaction price.
Classification and subsequent measurement
Financial assets – Policy applicable from 1 April 2018:
On initial recognition, a financial asset is classified as measured at: amortised cost; Fair Value through Other Comprehensive Income
– equity investment; or Fair Value through Profit or Loss.
Financial assets are not reclassified subsequent to their initial recognition unless the Group changes its business model for
managing financial assets, in which case all affected financial assets are reclassified on the first day of the first reporting period
following the change in the business model.
EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
70
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
71
NOTE 1 • SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT GROUP ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
NOTE 1 • SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT GROUP ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Amortised Cost
A financial asset is measured at amortised cost if it meets both of the following conditions and is not designated as at Fair Value
through Profit or Loss:
(h) Fair value estimation
The fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities must be estimated for recognition and measurement or for disclosure
purposes.
- it is held within a business model whose objective is to hold assets to collect contractual cash flows; and
- its contractual terms give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal
amount outstanding.
Equity Investment - Fair Value Through Other Comprehensive Income
On initial recognition of an equity investment that is not held for trading, the Group may irrevocably elect to present subsequent
changes in the investment’s fair value in Other Comprehensive Income. This election is made on an investment-by-investment basis.
Fair Value through Profit or Loss
All financial assets not classified as measured at amortised cost or Fair Value through Other Comprehensive Income as described
above are measured at Fair Value through Profit or Loss. This includes all derivative financial assets. On initial recognition, the Group
may irrevocably designate a financial asset that otherwise meets the requirements to be measured at amortised cost or at Fair
Value through Other Comprehensive Income as at Fair Value through Profit or Loss if doing so eliminates or significantly reduces an
accounting mismatch that would otherwise arise.
Financial assets – Subsequent measurement and gains and losses:
Financial assets at Fair Value through Profit or Loss
These assets are subsequently measured at fair value. Net gains and losses, including any interest or dividend income, are
recognised in profit or loss
Financial assets at amortised cost
These assets are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method. The amortised cost is reduced by
impairment losses. Interest income, foreign exchange gains and losses and impairment are recognised in profit or loss. Any gain or
loss on derecognition is recognised in profit or loss.
Equity investments at Fair Value through Other Comprehensive Income
These assets are subsequently measured at fair value. Dividends are recognised as income in profit or loss unless the dividend
clearly represents a recovery of part of the cost of the investment. Other net gains and losses are recognised in Other
Comprehensive Income and are never reclassified to profit or loss.
Financial liabilities - Classification, subsequent measurement and gains and losses
Financial liabilities are classified as measured at amortised cost or Fair Value through Profit or Loss. A financial liability is classified
as at Fair Value through Profit or Loss if it is classified as held-for-trading, it is a derivative or it is designated as such on initial
recognition. Financial liabilities at Fair Value through Profit or Loss are measured at fair value and net gains and losses, including any
interest expense, are recognised in profit or loss. Other financial liabilities are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the
effective interest method. Interest expense and foreign exchange gains and losses are recognised in profit or loss. Any gain or loss
on derecognition is also recognised in profit or loss.
Financial Assets - Policy applicable before 1 April 2018
The Group classifies non-derivative financial assets and liabilities into the following categories: loans and receivables and other
financial liabilities.
Loans and receivables
Loans and receivables are financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. Such assets
are recognised initially at fair value plus any directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, loans and
receivables are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method, less any impairment losses.
Loans and receivables comprise cash and cash equivalents, trade and other receivables and loans to shareholders and directors.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash balances and call deposits with original maturities of three months or less.
The fair values of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market are determined using valuation techniques. The
Group uses a variety of methods and makes assumptions that are based on market conditions existing at each balance date. Other
techniques, such as estimated discounted cash flows, are used to determine fair value for the remaining financial instruments.
The fair value of forward exchange contracts is determined using forward exchange market rates at the balance sheet date. Fair
values reflect the credit risk of the financial instrument and include adjustments to take account of the credit risk of the Group and
counterparty when appropriate.
The carrying value less impairment provision of trade receivables is assumed to approximate its fair value due to its short term
nature. The fair value of non-current financial liabilities for disclosure purposes is estimated by discounting the future contractual
cash flows at the current market interest rate that is available to the Group for similar financial instruments.
(i) Property, Plant and Equipment
Items of plant and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. Cost includes the purchase
consideration, and those costs directly attributable to bringing the asset to the location and condition necessary for its intended
use. Where an item of plant and equipment is disposed of, the gain or loss recognised in the statement of comprehensive income
is calculated as the difference between the net sales price and the carrying amount of the asset.
Subsequent costs
The Group recognises in the carrying amount of an item of property, plant and equipment the cost of replacing part of such an
item when that cost is incurred if it is probable that the future economic benefits embodied within the item will flow to the Group
and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. All other costs are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income as an
expense in the period they are incurred.
Depreciation
Depreciation begins when the asset is in the location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner
intended by management. The following rates have been used:
Leasehold improvements
3 to 9 years
Straight line
Hardware assets
3 to 6 years
Straight line
Plant and equipment
3 to 11 years
Straight line
Computer/Office equipment
1 to 3 years
Straight line
Motor vehicles
3 to 5 years
Straight line
The above rates reflect the estimated useful lives of the respected categories. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the
contracted lease term.
(j) Leases as a lessee
The Group recognises a right-of-use asset and a lease liability at the commencement date. The right-of-use asset is initially
measured at cost, which comprises the initial amount of the lease liability adjusted for any lease payments made at or before the
commencement date, plus any initial direct costs incurred and an estimate of costs to restore the underlying asset or the site on
which it is located, less any lease incentives received.
The right-of-use asset is subsequently depreciated using the straight-line method from the commencement date to the earlier of
the end of the useful life of the right-of-use asset or the end of the lease term. The estimated useful lives of right-of-use assets are
determined on the same basis as those of property, plant and equipment. In addition, the right-of-use asset is periodically reduced
by impairment losses, if any, and adjusted for certain remeasurements of the lease liability.
The lease liability is initially measured at the present value of the lease payments that are not paid at the commencement date,
discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease or, if that rate cannot be readily determined, the Group’s incremental
borrowing rate. Generally, the Group uses its incremental borrowing rate as the discount rate.
EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
72
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
73
NOTE 1 • SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT GROUP ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
NOTE 1 • SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT GROUP ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Lease payments included in the measurement of the lease liability comprise the following:
• fixed payments, including in-substance fixed payments;
• variable lease payments that depend on an index or a rate, initially measured using the index or rate as at the
commencement date;
• amounts expected to be payable under a residual guarantee; and
• the exercise priced under a purchase option that the Group is reasonably certain to exercise, lease payments in an optional
renewal period if the Group is reasonably certain to exercise an extension option, and penalties for early termination of a
lease unless the Group is reasonably certain not to terminate early.
The lease liability is measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method. It is remeasured when there is a change
in future lease payments arising from a change in an index or rate, if there is a change in the Group’s estimate of the amount
expected to be payable under a residual value guarantee, or if the Group changes its assessment of whether it will exercise a
purchase, extension or termination option.
When the lease liability is remeasured in this way, a corresponding adjustment is made to the carrying amount of the right-of-
use asset or is recorded in profit or loss if the carrying amount of the right-of-use asset has been reduced to zero.
The Group presents right-of-use assets in ‘Property, plant and equipment’. Lease liabilities are presented separately in the
Statement of Financial Position.
Short-term leases and leases of low-value items
The Group has elected not to recognise right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for short-term property leases and leases of low-
value assets including office equipment. The Group recognises the lease payments associated with these leases as an expense
on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
(k) Intangible assets
Research and Development
Expenditure on research activities, undertaken with the prospect of gaining new technical knowledge and understanding, is
recognised in the statement of comprehensive income when incurred.
Development activities involve a plan or design for the production of new or substantially improved products and processes.
Development expenditure is capitalised only if development costs can be measured reliably, the product or process is technically
and commercially feasible, future economic benefits are probable, and the Group intends to and has sufficient resources to
complete development and to use or sell the asset. The expenditure capitalised includes the cost of materials, direct labour
and overhead costs that are directly attributable to preparing the asset for its intended use. Other development expenditure is
recognised in the statement of comprehensive income when incurred.
Capitalised development expenditure is measured at cost less accumulated amortisation and accumulated impairment losses.
Other intangible assets
Other intangibles assets that are acquired by the Group, which have finite useful lives, are measured at cost less accumulated
amortisation and accumulated impairment losses.
Subsequent expenditure
Subsequent expenditure is only capitalised only when it increases the future economic benefits embodied in the specific asset
to which is relates. All other expenditure, including expenditure on internally generated goodwill and brands, is recognised in the
statement of coprehensive income when incurred.
Amortisation
Amortisation is recognised in the statement of comprehensive income on a straight line basis over the estimated useful life of
intangible asset. The estimated useful lives for the current and comparative periods are as follows:
Patents
10–20 years
Development Hardware & Platform
7–15 years
Development Products
Software
5–10 years
5–7 years
(l) Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realisable value. Costs are based on actual costs, applying the first in first out
principle, and include expenditure incurred in acquiring the inventories and bringing them to the existing condition and location. In
the case of manufactured inventories, cost includes direct materials and labour.
(m) Foreign Currencies
Transactions in foreign currencies are translated into the respective functional currencies of Group companies at the exchange rates
at the dates of the transactions.
Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into functional currency at the exchange rate at
the reporting date. Non-monetary assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value in a foreign currency are translated into the
functional currency at the exchange rate when the fair value was determined. Foreign currency differences are generally recognised
in the statement of comprehensive income. Non-monetary items that are measured based on historical cost in a foreign currency
are not translated. Foreign currency gains and losses are reported on a net basis as either finance income or finance expenses.
The assets and liabilities of foreign operations, including goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on acquisition, are translated
into NZD at the exchange rates at the reporting date. The income and expenses of foreign operations are translated into NZD at the
exchange rates at the dates of the transactions. Foreign currency differences are recognised in Other Comprehensive Income and
accumulated in the translation reserve.
(n) Goods and Services Tax
All amounts are shown exclusive of Goods and Services Tax (GST), except for receivables and payables that are stated inclusive of
GST.
(o) Employee benefits
Short-term employee benefits
Short-term employee benefits are expensed as the related service is provided. A liability is recognised for the amount expected to
be paid if the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation to pay this amount as a result of past service provided by the
employee and the obligation can be estimated reliably.
Shared-based payments
The grant-date fair value of equity-settled share-based payment awards to employees is generally recognised as an expense,
with a corresponding increase in equity, over the vesting period of the awards. The amounts recognised as an expense is adjusted
to reflect the number of awards for which the related service and non-market conditions are expected to be met, such that the
amount ultimately recognised is based on the number of awards that meet the related service and non-market performance
conditions at the vesting date. For share-based payment awards with non-vesting conditions, the grant-date fair value of the share-
based payment is measured to reflect such conditions and there is no true-up for differences between the expected and actual
outcomes.
(p) Impairment of assets
The carrying amounts of the Group’s assets other than inventories are reviewed at each balance date to determine whether there is
any objective evidence of impairment. If any such indication exists, the assets recoverable amount is estimated.
If the estimated recoverable amount of an asset is less than its carrying amount, an impairment test is undertaken to reduce
the carrying amount of assets to the estimated recoverable amount and an impairment loss is recognised in the statement of
comprehensive income.
Estimated recoverable amount of receivables carried at amortised cost are calculated as the present value of estimated future cash
flows, discounted at their original effective interest rate. Receivables with a short duration are not discounted.
Estimated recoverable amount of other assets is the greater of their fair value less costs to sell and value in use. Value in use is
determined by estimating future cash flows from the use and ultimate disposal of the asset and discounting these to their present
value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market rates and the risks specific to the asset. For an asset that does not
generate largely independent cash inflows, the recoverable amount is determined for the cash-generating unit to which the asset
belongs.
EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
74
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
75
NOTE 1 • SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT GROUP ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
NOTE 2 • IMPACT OF INITIAL APPLICATION OF NEW NZ IFRS (CONTINUED)
(q) Borrowing costs
Borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset are capitalised as
part of the cost of that asset. Other borrowing costs are recognised as an expense in the period in which they are incurred.
(r) Grant income
Government grants are recognised at fair value in the statement of comprehensive income over the same periods as the costs for
which the grants are intended to compensate.
(s) Segment reporting
Segment results that are reported to the CEO include items directly attributable to a segment as well as those that can be allocated
on a reasonable basis. Unallocated items comprise income tax .
(t) Standards issued but not yet adopted
A number of new standards, amendments to standards and interpretations are effective for annual periods beginning on or after a
1 April 2019, and have not been applied as they are not expected to have a significant impact on the Group’s consolidated financial
statements.
NOTE 2 • IMPACT OF INITIAL APPLICATION OF NEW NZ IFRS
This note discloses the new accounting policies that have been applied from 1 April 2017, where they have changed from those
applied in prior periods. The Group has adopted NZ IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers, NZ IFRS 16 Leases and NZ
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments, with application from 1 April 2017. This note explains the impact of the adoption of NZ IFRS 15, NZ
IFRS 16 and NZ IFRS 9 on the Group’s financial statements.
(A) Revenue
Under NZ IFRS 16, a customer contract contains a lease based on whether the customer has the right to direct the use of an asset,
in this case being the EROAD eHubo or Tubo (the unit). This differs from the definition under NZ IAS 17 which defines a lease as an
agreement providing the customer the right to use an asset. Historically the company determined that EROAD’s customers had
physical control of the EROAD unit and therefore a right to use an asset and consequently a lease. Under NZ IFRS 16, the focus is on
the right to direct the use of the asset and the company has determined that EROAD’s customers do not have that right as EROAD
continues to have the right and ability to change how the unit operates during the customer’s contractual term. These contracts
therefore no longer meet the definition of a lease and are accounted for as service contracts under NZ IFRS 15.
NZ IFRS 15 replaces NZ IAS 18 Revenue and NZ IAS 11 Construction Contracts. The standard applies to all revenue arising from
contracts with customers unless those contracts are within the scope of another standard. The standard is based on a five-step
model to account for revenue arising from contracts with customers. Under NZ IFRS 15, revenue is recognised to depict the transfer
of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled
in exchange for those goods or services. The standard also specifies the accounting for incremental costs of obtaining a contract
with a customer and for the costs incurred to fulfil a contract with a customer if those cost are not within the scope of another
standard.
Application of the new lease definition represents a change in the way the company recognises revenue and costs relating to its
contracts with customers. The company no longer recognises revenues at the point of dispatch to the customer from contracts for
outright sales of an EROAD units, installation services, sale of accessories or entering finance leases. EROAD now recognises these
revenue streams over the contract term, typically 3 years. Other impacts from adopting the new accounting standards include a
reduction in the capitalisation of costs associated with establishing the customer contracts.
In adopting the above new standards, the Group has applied the following:
The following new revenue accounting policies have been adopted:
A. NZ IFRS 15 – In the current year, the Group has applied NZ IFRS 15 from its effective date. The date of initial application of NZ
IFRS 15 for the Group is 1 April 2017. The group has applied NZ IFRS 15 using retrospective approach with practical expedients
and restatement of comparative information.
B. NZ IFRS 16 –In the current year, the Group has applied NZ IFRS 16 in advance of its effective date. The date of initial application
of NZ IFRS 16 for the Group is 1 April 2017. The group has applied NZ IFRS 16 using the full retrospective approach, with
restatement of comparative information.
C. NZ IFRS 9 – The Group has applied NZ IFRS 9 modified retrospectively, but has elected not to restate comparative information.
As a result, the comparative information provided continues to be accounted for in accordance with the Group’s previous
accounting policies.
The effect of initially applying these standards is mainly attributed to:
• Reversing previous sales and associated cost of sales of all contracts deemed “finance leases” under the old lease standard;
• Deferral of the recognition of revenue relating to eHubo hardware sales, installations and accessories;
• Expensing of costs capitalised for contract establishment costs under the old lease standard;
• Recognition of right to use assets and associated liabilities where EROAD is the lessee; and
• Minimal impact arising from application of the Group’s expected credit loss model.
The decision was made to early adopt NZ IFRS 16, as while under the existing Leases standard NZ IAS 17, many of EROAD’s
customer contracts met the definition of a lease and lease accounting as a lessor was applied, these same contracts do not meet
the definition of a lease under NZ IFRS 16 and would therefore be accounted for as service contracts under IFRS 15. Without
early adoption of IFRS 16 EROAD would effectively be restating revenue again for the year ended 31 March 2020 on adoption of
the new lease standard. The Board believes that in early adopting the new lease standard the potential confusion created around
EROAD’s revenues is eliminated and this method will provide more relevant and understandable information for the user of the
financial statements.
Software as a service revenue
The Group generates revenue through the sale of hardware assets, rental of hardware assets, installation of hardware assets and
provision of software services as part of contracts with customers as part of a bundled package. These hardware units enable
customers to access the software platform offered by the Group. The transaction involving hardware and accessories do not
convey a distinct good or service. The sale does not transfer control to the customer as the Group provides a significant service
of integrating the software service to produce a combined output. The sale of the hardware, accessories and software service are
referred to as Software as a Service (SaaS) revenue, which is recognised over time as the customer simultaneously receives and
consumes the benefits of the service. The Group concluded that the customer is expected to benefit from the services evenly over
the period of delivery being the contract period and as a result would recognise revenue on a straight line basis of the contract
period. The Group recognises revenue from the date of installation as this is when the Group deems the service period to begin.
There are no variable consideration terms within the contracts.
The timing of revenue recognition may differ from the timing of invoicing to customers and the receipt of consideration. A contract
liability is recognised where consideration is received in advance of the completion of associated performance obligations. The
contract liability derecognised over time evenly over the period of the contract as the customer derives the benefit evenly from the
services provided over the contract period. The majority of contracts are for 3 years and can be for a term of up to 5 years. As a
result there is a financing component which the group recognise as a finance cost when consideration is received in advance.
The Group offers installation services as part of a number of promises to transfer goods and services within each contract.
Installation services do not convey a distinct good or service and therefore are not a separate performance obligation as the
installation is a set-up activity that does not provide the customer a direct benefit other than access to the software services. As a
result, the installation service is considered as part of the single performance obligation; referred to as Software as a Service (SaaS)
revenue, which includes the software service and hardware sale or rental for which the customer simultaneously receives and
consumes the benefit of the service. Where installation revenue is received in advance of satisfying the performance obligation a
contract liability is recognised. The contract liability derecognised over time evenly over the period of the contract as the customer
derives the benefit evenly from the services provided over the contract period. The majority of contracts are for 3 years and can be
for a term of up to 5. As a result there is a financing component which the group recognise as a finance cost when consideration is
received in advance.
EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
76
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
77
NOTE 2 • IMPACT OF INITIAL APPLICATION OF NEW NZ IFRS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 2 • IMPACT OF INITIAL APPLICATION OF NEW NZ IFRS (CONTINUED)
Capitalised contract fulfillment costs
The Group capitalises incremental costs of fulfilling customer contracts, typically distribution and installation costs. Contract
fulfillment costs are amortised evenly over the period of the contract. The majority of contracts are for 3 years and can be for a term
of up to 5 years.
Capitalised contract acquisition costs
The Group has applied a policy of capitalising only costs that are incremental in obtaining contracts with customers, typically sales
commissions. Contract acquisition costs are amortised evenly over the period of the contract. The majority of contracts are for 3
years and can be for a term of up to 5 years.
(B) Leases
The Group separates the components of a contract into the lease and non-lease component and classifies the lease component as a
lease if the contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration.
For all leases where EROAD is the lessee; except short-term leases and leases of low value assets (based on the nature of the asset
and its value), the Group:
a) recognises right-of-use assets and lease liabilities in the consolidated statement of financial position, initially measured at the
present value of future lease payments;
b) recognises depreciation of right-of-use assets and interest on lease liabilities in the consolidated statement of comprehensive
income; and
c) separates the total amount of cash paid into a principal portion (presented within financing activities) and interest (presented
within operating activities) in the consolidated statement of cash flows.
Lease incentives (e.g. free rent period) are recognised as part of the measurement of the right-of-use assets and lease liabilities
whereas under NZ IAS 17 they resulted in the recognition of a lease incentive liability, amortised as a reduction of rental expense on
a straight-line basis.
The right-of-use assets are tested for impairment in accordance with NZ IAS 36 Impairment of Assets. This replaces the previous
requirement to recognise a provision for onerous lease contracts on operating leases. For short term leases (lease term of 12 months
or less) and leases of low-value assets (such as personal computers and office furniture), the Group has opted to recognise a lease
expense on a straight-line basis as permitted by NZ IFRS 16.
(C) Financial Instruments
The Group classifies its financial assets as being measured at amortised cost. At initial recognition, the Group measures a financial
asset at its fair value plus transaction costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition of the financial asset.
The Group assesses on a forward-looking basis, the expected credit losses associated with its financial assets carried at amortised
cost. The impairment methodology applied depends on whether there has been a significant increase in credit risk. In assessing
whether there has been a significant increase in credit risk, the Group considers both forward looking and financial history of
counterparts to assess the probability of default or likelihood that full settlement is received.
For trade receivables, the Group applies the simplified approach permitted by NZ IFRS 9, which requires expected lifetime
credit losses to be recognised from initial recognition of the trade receivables. Trade receivables are written off when there is no
reasonable expectation of recovery. Indicators that there is no reasonable expectation of recovery include, amongst others, the
failure of a debtor to engage in a repayment plan with the Group, and a failure to make contractual payments for a period of greater
than 180 days past due. The expected credit loss allowances for financial assets are based on assumptions about risk of default and
expected credit loss rates. The Group uses judgement in making these assumptions and selecting the inputs to the impairment
calculation. This is based on the Group’s past history, existing market conditions as well as forward looking estimates at the end of
each reporting period.
Trade Receivables
The Group’s trade receivables are subject to NZ IFRS 9’s expected credit loss model. The Group has applied the NZ IFRS 9
simplified approach to measuring expected credit losses which uses a lifetime expected credit loss allowance for all trade
receivables. To measure expected credit losses, trade receivables have been grouped and reviewed on the basis of the number of
days past due. The expected credit loss allowance has been calculated by considering the impact of the following characteristics:
• The Baseline characteristic considers the age of each invoice and applies an increasing expected credit loss estimate as the
trade receivable ages.
• The Aging and Write offs characteristics consider the history of write off related to the specific customer and the relative
size of aged debt to current debt. If the trade receivable aged over 180 days makes up more than 50% of the total trade
receivable for a specific customer, further provision for expected credit loss is added.
• The Country, Customer and Market characteristics consider the relative risk related to the country and/or region within which
the customer resides and makes an assessment of the financial strength of the customer and the market position that the
Group has achieved within that market.
This note discloses the new accounting policies that have been applied from 1 April 2017, where they have changed from those
applied in prior periods. The Group has adopted NZ IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers, NZ IFRS 16 Leases and NZ
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments, with application from 1 April 2017. This note explains the impact of the adoption of NZ IFRS 15, NZ
IFRS 16 and NZ IFRS 9 on the Group’s financial statements.
As a result of the changes in the entity’s accounting policies, prior year financial statements are restated to reflect these changes.
The adjustments from the adoption of NZ IFRS 15 and NZ IFRS 16 have been explained in Note 2(a) and Note 2(b) respectively. The
tables below detail the adjustments recognised for each individual line item.
STATEMENT OF CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2018
As originally
presented
NZ IFRS 15
NZ IFRS 16
Restated
$
2(a)(i)
$
2(a)(ii)
$
2(b)(i)
$
2(b)(ii)
$
$
Continuing operations
Revenue
Expenses
51,523,757
(1,781,914)
(975,500)
(4,999,847)
-
43,766,496
(36,513,784)
2,240,400
-
193,777
858,161
(33,221,446)
Earnings before interest, taxation, depreciation
and amortisation
15,009,973
458,486
(975,500)
(4,806,070)
858,161
10,545,050
Depreciation of Property, Plant & Equipment
(9,945,960)
(790,949)
Amortisation of Intangible Assets
(5,594,391)
Amortisation of Contract and Customer
Acquisition Assets
-
-
-
-
-
-
6,027,732
(652,214)
(5,361,391)
-
(3,673,129)
-
-
(5,594,391)
(3,673,129)
Earnings before interest and taxation
(530,378)
(332,463)
(975,500)
(2,451,467)
205,947
(4,083,861)
Finance income
Finance expense
Net financing costs
245,616
-
-
(147,922)
-
97,694
(1,259,442)
(99,360)
(171,260)
(219,050)
(147,777)
(1,896,889)
(1,013,826)
(99,360)
(171,260)
(366,972)
(147,777)
(1,799,195)
Profit/(loss) before tax
(1,544,204)
(431,823)
(1,146,760)
(2,818,439)
58,170
(5,883,056)
Income tax (expense)/benefit
1,753,820
135,282
318,004
237,280
(18,154)
2,426,232
Profit/(loss) from continuing operations
209,616
(296,541)
(828,756)
(2,581,159)
40,016
(3,456,824)
Profit/(loss) after tax for the year attributable
to the shareholders
209,616
(296,541)
(828,756)
(2,581,159)
40,016
(3,456,824)
Other comprehensive income
(196,793)
-
-
-
-
(196,793)
Total comprehensive income/(loss) for the year
12,823
(296,541)
(828,756)
(2,581,159)
40,016
(3,653,617)
Earnings per share - Basic (cents)
Earnings per share - Diluted (cents)
0.34
0.34
(0.48)
(0.48)
(1.34)
(1.34)
(4.19)
(4.16)
0.06
0.06
(5.61)
(5.57)
EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
78
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
79
NOTE 2 • IMPACT OF INITIAL APPLICATION OF NEW NZ IFRS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 2 • IMPACT OF INITIAL APPLICATION OF NEW NZ IFRS (CONTINUED)
STATEMENT OF CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL POSITION
AS AT 31 MARCH 2018
As originally
presented
NZ IFRS 15
NZ IFRS 16
Restated
GROUP
As at 1 April 2018
As at 1 April 2017
$
$
$
2(a)(i)
$
2(a)(ii)
$
2(b)(i)
$
2(b)(ii)
$
$
Retained earnings as originally presented
(12,625,692)
(13,066,244)
21,870,415
9,498,071
13,419,427
-
-
1,816,447
-
-
21,456
46,625,816
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
28,337,668
2,179,700
29,901,469
-
-
4,421,483
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(1,793,008)
2,140,135
1,448,655
(1,816,447)
-
-
-
(20,665)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
21,870,415
9,498,071
11,626,419
2,140,135
1,448,655
-
-
-
21,456
46,605,151
(8,172,943)
1,503,802
23,848,227
-
2,204,472
1,635,487
(4,421,483)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
29,901,469
2,204,472
1,635,487
-
-
-
3,878,971
330,639
960,437
1,740,959
42,379
6,953,385
66,539,591
2,510,339
960,437
(7,013,508)
1,546,181
64,543,040
113,165,407
2,510,339
960,437
(7,034,173)
1,546,181
111,148,191
-
10,574,689
5,184,311
9,439,139
85,245
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3,691,883
1,742,998
2,265,044
(2,265,044)
-
1,147,462
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(2)
(325,185)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
801,024
-
-
10,574,689
4,859,124
9,439,139
85,245
-
5,434,881
-
801,024
1,147,462
28,695,890
1,426,839
1,742,998
(2)
475,839
32,341,564
15,908,670
-
-
-
2,982,072
1,756,999
1,236,149
(1,236,149)
-
164,134
-
43,911
17,308,953
1,789,834
-
-
(15,131)
1,741,868
(117,050)
(117,050)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
15,908,670
4,739,071
-
1,264,690
1,264,690
51,519
127,383
1,316,209
22,039,814
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted Bank Account
Trade and other receivables
Contract costs
Costs to obtain contracts
Finance lease receivable
Loan to directors
Intercompany receivables
Current tax receivable
Total Current Assets
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
Property, plant and equipment
Intangible assets
Contract costs
Costs to obtain contracts
Finance lease receivable
Investment in subsidiaries
Loan to shareholders and directors
Deferred tax assets
Total Non-Current Assets
TOTAL ASSETS
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Overdrafts
Borrowings
Trade payables and accruals
PAYABLE TO NZTA
Current tax payable
Intercompany payable
Contract liabilities
Deferred revenue
Lease liabilities
Employee entitlements
Total Current Liabilities
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Borrowings
Contract liabilities
Deferred revenue
Lease liabilities
Deferred tax liabilities
Total Non-Current Liabilities
TOTAL LIABILITIES
NET ASSETS
EQUITY
Share capital
Translation reserve
Retained earnings
Change in accounting policy - IFRS 15
Sale of hardware and accessories (Note 2(a)(i))
Sale of installation services (Note 2(a)(ii))
Change in accounting policy - IFRS 16
Impact of the new definition of a lease (Note 2(b)(i))
Impact on lessee accounting (Note 2(b)(ii))
Opening retained earnings
(683,188)
(2,524,843)
(385,822)
(1,696,267)
(6,945,165)
(246,097)
(4,364,539)
(286,225)
(23,024,985)
(19,799,097)
STATEMENT OF CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2018
As originally
presented
NZ IFRS 15
NZ IFRS 16
Restated
$
2(a)(i)
$
2(a)(ii)
$
2(b)(i)
$
2(b)(ii)
$
$
(1,259,442)
(99,360)
(171,260)
(219,050)
(147,777)
(1,896,889)
Cash flows from operating activities
Cash received from customers
39,172,438
99,360
171,260
Payments to suppliers and employees
(36,408,233)
2,240,400
Interest received
Interest paid
Tax received
161,375
-
340,456
-
Net cash inflow from operating activities
2,006,594
2,240,400
Cash flows from investing activities
Payments for investment in property, plant &
equipment
(14,519,691)
(2,240,400)
Payments for investment in intangible assets
(6,833,083)
Payments for investment in contract assets
Payments for investment in customer acquisition
assets
-
-
-
-
-
Net cash outflow from investing activities
(21,352,774)
(2,240,400)
Cash flows from financing activities
Receipts from bank loans
Repayments of bank loans
Repayments of lease liability
Receipts from issue of equity
Payments for costs of raising equity
Net cash outflow from financing activities
23,731,244
(4,277,189)
-
21,501,711
(673,657)
40,282,109
Net increase/(decrease) in cash held
20,935,929
Cash at beginning of the financial period
934,486
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
366,972
203,466
(147,922)
-
39,810,030
902,661
(33,061,706)
-
13,453
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
340,456
203,466
754,884
5,205,344
5,444,532
-
(3,000,865)
(2,647,133)
-
-
-
-
(11,315,559)
(6,833,083)
(3,000,865)
(2,647,133)
(203,466)
-
(23,796,640)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
23,731,244
(4,277,189)
(754,884)
(754,884)
-
-
21,501,711
(673,657)
(754,884)
39,527,225
-
-
20,935,929
934,486
-
21,870,415
46,004,843
3,216,673
3,484,866
(117,052)
1,792,048
54,381,378
Closing cash and cash equivalents (net of
overdrafts)
21,870,415
67,160,564
(706,334)
(2,524,429)
(6,917,121)
(245,867)
56,766,813
80,326,438
-
(540,182)
(23,146)
-
414
-
-
80,326,438
28,044
230
(534,640)
(12,625,692)
(683,188)
(2,524,843)
(6,945,165)
(246,097)
(23,024,985)
The Group notes that the transition adjustments above differ from the estimated impact of NZ IFRS 15 disclosed in our annual
report for the year ended 31 March 2018. At the time of reporting the Group did not anticipate early adoption of NZ IFRS 16 nor the
significant impact of doing so. This is the first set of Group’s financials statements where NZ IFRS 9, 15 and 16 has been applied.
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
67,160,564
(706,334)
(2,524,429)
(6,917,121)
(245,867)
56,766,813
EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
80
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
81
NOTE 2 • IMPACT OF INITIAL APPLICATION OF NEW NZ IFRS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 2 • IMPACT OF INITIAL APPLICATION OF NEW NZ IFRS (CONTINUED)
STATEMENT OF CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL POSITION
AS AT 1 APRIL 2017
As originally
presented
NZ IFRS 15
NZ IFRS 16
Restated
$
2(a)(i)
$
2(a)(ii)
$
2(b)(i)
$
2(b)(ii)
$
$
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted Bank Account
Trade and other receivables
Contract costs
Costs to obtain contracts
Finance lease receivable
Current tax receivable
Total Current Assets
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
Property, plant and equipment
Intangible assets
Contract costs
Costs to obtain contracts
Finance lease receivable
Deferred tax assets
Total Non-Current Assets
935,359
9,208,289
6,800,780
-
-
498,142
361,912
17,804,482
23,763,937
28,662,777
-
-
906,265
1,925,352
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
777,464
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(1,281,247)
1,482,115
927,327
(498,142)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
935,359
9,208,289
5,519,533
1,482,115
927,327
-
361,912
-
630,053
-
18,434,535
-
-
-
-
-
(8,756,143)
2,153,347
17,938,605
-
2,108,773
935,665
(906,265)
-
-
-
-
28,662,777
2,108,773
935,665
-
154,119
651,295
1,570,923
65,826
4,367,515
55,258,331
931,583
651,295
(5,047,047)
2,219,173
54,013,335
TOTAL ASSETS
73,062,813
931,583
651,295
(4,416,994)
2,219,173
72,447,870
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Overdrafts
Trade payables and accruals
Payable to NZTA
Contract liabilities
Deferred revenue
Lease liabilities
Employee entitlements
Total Current Liabilities
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Borrowings
Contract liabilities
Deferred revenue
Lease liabilities
Deferred tax liabilities
Total Non-Current Liabilities
873
5,632,175
9,243,383
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3,403,551
1,166,385
2,656,518
(2,656,518)
-
1,201,002
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(380,204)
-
-
-
727,406
-
873
5,251,971
9,243,383
4,569,936
-
727,406
1,201,002
18,733,951
747,033
1,166,385
-
347,202
20,994,571
7,029,304
-
-
-
2,311,526
1,187,445
1,743,824
(1,743,824)
-
-
8,773,128
-
2,670
570,372
-
-
(6,268)
1,181,177
(49,805)
(49,805)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7,029,304
3,498,971
-
2,093,192
2,093,192
56,812
3,409
2,150,004
12,624,876
TOTAL LIABILITIES
27,507,079
1,317,405
2,347,562
(49,805)
2,497,206
33,619,447
NET ASSETS
EQUITY
Share capital
Translation reserve
Retained earnings
45,555,734
(385,822)
(1,696,267)
(4,367,189)
(278,033)
38,828,423
58,965,367
(343,389)
-
-
-
-
-
(2,650)
-
58,965,367
8,192
(337,847)
(13,066,244)
(385,822)
(1,696,267)
(4,364,539)
(286,225)
(19,799,097)
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
45,555,734
(385,822)
(1,696,267)
(4,367,189)
(278,033)
38,828,423
Note 2(a) NZ IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers
The Group no longer classifies its customer contracts as lease contracts having early adopted the new determination of a lease
under NZ IFRS 16. All customer contracts are now accounted for under NZ IFRS 15 as service contracts. Refer to Note 1 for
judgements made.
2(a)(i) Sale of hardware and accessories
The Group reversed the revenue received for the sale of hardware and accessories, increasing the deferred revenue balance with
a corresponding adjustment to revenue and retained earnings. In addition to this, hardware assets previously de-recognised
as part of a sale have been recognised as property, plant and equipment, with a corresponding adjustment being made to
depreciation, accumulated depreciation and retained earnings. The hardware assets recognised are measured at cost and
depreciated based on their estimated useful economic lives. The impact of the adjustments for each financial statement line item
affected is stated above in Note 2.
2(a)(ii) Sale of installation services
Following the adoption of NZ IFRS 15, installation revenue previously recognised has been allocated to a contract liability
(deferred revenue) where the contracts have been determined to not yet be complete at the period end, with a corresponding
adjustment being made to revenue and retained earnings. The corresponding contract costs associated to the installation of
hardware units is concluded to be a cost of fulfilling the contract and has been capitalised as a contract asset by adjusting
expenses and retained earnings. The costs of fulfilling the contract are amortised based on the expected useful life of the
contract asset. The impact of the adjustments for each financial statement line item affected is stated above in Note 2.
Note 2(b) NZ IFRS 16 Leases
NZ IFRS 16 replaces NZ IAS 17 Leases and sets out the principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure
of leases. The standard identifies a lease within a contract if the contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified
asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration. It introduces significant changes to lessee accounting by removing the
distinction between operating and finance leases and requiring the recognition of a right-of-use asset and a lease liability at the
lease commencement for all leases, except for short-term leases and leases of low value assets. In addition to this, the standard
specifically requires for the separating of components of a contract into the lease and non-lease components.
In the current year, the Group has applied NZ IFRS 16 in advance of its effective date. The date of initial application of NZ IFRS
16 for the Group is 1 April 2017. The group has applied NZ IFRS 16 using the full retrospective approach, with restatement of
comparative information. The Group have elected to apply practical expedients with respect to short term leases. The Directors
are of the view that early adopting the NZ IFRS 16 at the same time as NZ IFRS 15 is the most appropriate approach, given that
the majority of EROAD’s contracts have been classified as leases under NZ IAS 17. The change in the definition to the right to
direct the use and control as the EROAD hardware has a significant impact on the new NZ IFRS 15 revenue recognition and
therefore the Directors decided to adopt the new revenue and lease standards concurrently.
2(b)(i) Impact of the new definition of a lease as a lessor
Prior to the adoption of NZ IFRS 16, the group accounted for the rental of hardware units to customers as either operating or finance
leases based on an assessment of whether substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership had been transferred to the customer.
Contracts deemed to be a finance lease were accounted for by derecognising the sold hardware asset and recognising a sale at the
inception of the contract.
As a result of the change in definition of leases within the standard, these contracts are now accounted for under NZ IFRS 15.As
a result of the contracts no longer meeting the definition of a lease, initial direct costs of obtaining the lease contract which were
previously capitalised under NZ IAS 17, have been reassessed under NZ IFRS 15. Applying NZ IFRS 15, the Group has reassessed
historical capitalised amounts based on the new definitions within NZ IFRS 15. The Group has capitalised the costs that are incremental
in obtaining contracts with customers in accordance with NZ IFRS 15. The Group performed a reallocation of revenue and expenses
based on the change in accounting policy, the impact of the adjustments for each financial statement line item affected is stated above
at Note 2. The impact of restating previously recognised finance leases has had a significant impact on the restatement of comparative
numbers. The impact of the adjustments for each financial statement line item affected is stated above in Note 2.
2(b)(ii) Impact on lessee accounting
Former Operating Leases as a lessee
Under NZ IFRS 16 the Group has now ra right-of-use asset and lease liability in the consolidated statement of financial position
initially measured at the present value of future lease payments. The Group has also recognised depreciation of the right-of-use
asset and interest on lease liabilities in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income. Payments made are separated
into a principal portion (presented within financing activities) and interest portion (presented within operating activities) in the
consolidated statement of cash flows. The impact of the adjustments for each financial statement line item affected is stated above
in Note 2.
EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
82
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
83
NOTE 2 • IMPACT OF INITIAL APPLICATION OF NEW NZ IFRS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 4 • OPERATING EXPENSES
Note 2(c) NZ IFRS 9 Financial Instruments
NZ IFRS 9, as it relates to the Group, replaces the provisions of NZ IAS 39 that relate to the recognition, classification, measurement
and impairment of financial assets. The adoption of NZ IFRS 9 from 1 April 2018 resulted in changes in accounting policies however
has not resulted in material changes to amounts recognised in the consolidated interim financial statements.
Classification and measurement
NZ IFRS 9 impacts the following classifications of financial assets:
• Cash
• Trade and other receivables
There was no change in the fair value of the financial assets as a result of the reclassification.
NOTE 3 • REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS
Revenue from contracts with customers
Software as a Service (SaaS) revenue
Other
Transaction fee revenue
Grant revenue
Other revenue
Total Revenues
GROUP
2019
$
2018
$
Restated
57,432,656
40,418,366
2,376,232
859,746
683,262
61,351,896
1,847,006
894,552
606,572
43,766,496
Set out above is the disaggregation of the Group’s revenue from contracts with customers. The disaggregation reflects the nature,
amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows are affected by economic factors. Specifically, software as a service
(SaaS) revenue represents revenue earned from customer contracts for the sale or rental of hardware, installation services and
provision of software services. Transaction fee revenue relates to the collection of Road User Charges (RUC) fees. Refer to Note 1 for
the accounting policy.
Transaction price allocated to the remaining performance obligations
The below table represents the revenue allocated to performance obligations that are unsatisfied or partially unsatisfied at the
period end. The revenue amounts yet to be recognised under non-cancellable contract agreements at 31 March are expected to be
recognised by EROAD based on the time bands disclosed below.
Software as a Service (SaaS) revenue
Not later than one year
Later than one year not later than five years
Later than five years
GROUP
2019
$
56,372,816
61,037,759
-
2018
$
Restated
47,347,978
53,109,822
-
Total price allocated to remaining performance obligations
117,410,575
100,457,800
The Group reports the Non-GAAP measure, Future Contracted Income, to align with the change in accounting policies the definition
of Future Contracted Income has been amended to include all future hardware and SaaS cash inflows relating to income under non-
cancellable long-term agreements. The disclosure above aligns with the Future Contracted Income reported by the Group.
Personnel expenses - net of capitalised employee remuneration
Administrative and other operating expenses
SaaS platform costs
Directors fees
Auditor's remuneration - KPMG
Tax compliance services - KPMG
Tax advisory services - KPMG
Corporate Finance - KPMG*
Total operating expenses
Note
6
26
2019
$
21,202,343
17,080,925
6,663,250
352,266
278,500
111,434
29,999
-
GROUP
2018
$
Restated
15,898,987
11,675,364
4,983,418
259,070
189,525
57,509
69,554
88,019
45,718,717
33,221,446
* Gross Corporate Finance fees were $40,000 (2018: $250,393) of which $40,000 (2018: $162,374) was capitalised. These fees
were for advice provided in relation to the debt restructuring which took place during the period.
During the year the costs expensed for Research and Development was $5,081,712 (2018: $4,472,760).
NOTE 5 • SEGMENTAL NOTE
The Group has three segments as described below, which are the Group’s strategic divisions. The strategic divisions offer
different services and are managed separately because they require different technology, services and marketing strategies.
For each strategic division, the Group’s CEO (the chief operating decision maker) reviews internal management reports. The
following summary describes the operations in each of the Group’s segments.
EROAD reports selected financial information segmented by geographic location for operating companies and corporate and
development costs.
• Corporate & Development: Corporate head office costs and R&D activities for development of new and existing products and
services
• North America: Operating companies serving customers in North America
• Australia & New Zealand: Operating companies serving customers in Australia & New Zealand
Inter-segment pricing is determined on an arm’s length basis.
EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
84
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
85
NOTE 5 • SEGMENTAL NOTE (CONTINUED)
NOTE 5 • SEGMENTAL NOTE (CONTINUED)
Reportable segment information
Information related to each reportable segment is set out below. Segment result represents Earnings before Interest, Taxation,
Depreciation & Amortisation (EBITDA), which is the measure reported to the chief operating decision maker.
Corporate & Development
North America
Australia & New Zealand
2019
$
2018
$
Restated
2019
$
2018
$
Restated
2019
$
2018
$
Restated
-
-
-
-
15,277,175
7,712,703
42,155,481
32,705,663
-
-
2,376,232
1,847,006
12,853,540
22,656,601
421,373
183,564
276,685
368,185
12,853,540
22,656,601
15,698,548
7,896,267
44,808,398
34,920,854
(11,962,696)
(4,868,846)
404,656
(3,374,613)
27,300,823
22,114,158
Revenue
Software as a Service (SaaS) revenue
Transaction fee revenue
Other revenue ₁
Earnings Before Interest, Taxation,
Depreciation & Amortisation
Total assets
85,397,210
72,528,181
18,794,174
17,112,072
42,031,363
33,732,415
Depreciation of Property, Plant &
Equipment
(771,830)
(888,034)
(3,181,224)
(1,657,788)
(3,798,308)
(3,285,883)
Amortisation of Intangible Assets
(6,479,134)
(5,594,391)
-
-
-
-
Amortisation of Contract and Customer
Acquisition Assets
-
-
(1,109,861)
(637,374)
(3,742,232)
(3,035,755)
₁ Revenue from Corporate & Development Markets includes R&D Grant Income of $859,746 (2018:$894,552).
Reconciliation of information on reportable segments
Revenue
Total revenue for reportable segments
Elimination of inter-segment revenue
Consolidated Revenue
EBITDA
Total EBITDA for reportable segments
Elimination of inter-segment EBITDA
Consolidated EBITDA
Depreciation
Total depreciation for reportable segments
Elimination of inter-segment profit
Consolidated Depreciation
Total assets
Total assets for reportable segments
Elimination of inter-segment balances
Consolidated Total assets
GROUP
2019
$
73,360,486
(12,008,590)
61,351,896
15,742,783
(109,604)
15,633,179
(7,751,362)
1,130,090
(6,621,272)
146,222,747
(23,023,170)
123,199,577
2018
$
Restated
65,473,722
(21,707,226)
43,766,496
13,870,699
(3,325,649)
10,545,050
(5,831,705)
470,314
(5,361,391)
123,372,668
(12,224,477)
111,148,191
Allocation of Development Assets
Included within Total Assets are Development Assets of $29,764,349 (2018: $26,852,630) which for the purpose of the segment
note have been allocated to the Corporate & Development Market based on the ownership of intellectual property. The amortisation
for these assets are also presented in the Corporate & Development segment. For impairment testing purposes management
allocate the Development Assets to the cash generating units (CGUs) based on the specific CGU that the Development Asset
relates to, or if the Development Asset is developed for use globally across all CGU’s, the asset is allocated to CGU’s based on
the proportionate share of the Group’s Contracted Units. At 31 March 2019 there was $18,868,409 (2018: $16,911,642) of global
Development Assets that have been allocated across CGU’s based on the Contracted Units. The allocation of the Development
Asset to CGU’s within the following reportable segments for the purpose of impairment testing was as follows:
Development Assets allocated to North America
Development Assets allocated to Australia & New Zealand
Total Development Assets
2019
$
13,442,778
16,321,571
29,764,349
2018
$
12,822,744
14,029,886
26,852,630
Geographic information
The geographic information below analyses the Group’s revenue and non-current assets by the Company’s country of domicile and
other countries. In presenting the following information segment revenue has been based on the geographic location of customers
and segment assets were based on the geographic location of the assets.
Revenue
New Zealand
All foreign countries:
USA
Australia
Total revenue
Non-current assets
New Zealand
All foreign countries:
USA
Australia
Total non-current assets
Non-current assets exclude financial instruments and deferred tax assets.
2019
$
2018
$
Restated
45,010,149
35,443,672
15,698,548
643,199
61,351,896
7,896,267
426,557
43,766,496
58,282,604
45,669,216
13,276,191
237,801
71,796,596
11,527,106
393,333
57,589,655
EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
86
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
87
NOTE 6 • PERSONNEL EXPENSES
NOTE 9 • INCOME TAX EXPENSE
Salaries and wages - excluding capitalised commission costs
Annual leave
Performance bonus
Share-based payments
Salaries and wages capitalised to Development and Software Assets
2019
$
23,663,103
173,682
700,337
367,946
(3,702,725)
21,202,343
GROUP
2018
$
Restated
19,897,273
(107,912)
894,983
268,754
(5,054,111)
15,898,987
NOTE 7 • CONTRACT FULFILMENT AND COSTS TO OBTAIN CONTRACTS
The Group capitalises incremental costs of fulfilling customer contracts, typically distribution and installation costs. The Group
also capitalises costs that are incremental in obtaining contracts with customers, typically sales commissions. Both contract
fulfillment and costs to obtain contracts are amortised evenly over the period of the contract. The majority of contracts are for
3 years and can be for a term of up to 5 years.
The following table provides information about contract fulfilment and costs to obtain contracts with customers.
Contract Fulfilment
Costs to obtain contracts
2019
$
2018
$
2019
$
2018
$
Opening Net Book Value
Additions
Amortisation
Closing Net Book Value
Current
Non-current
NOTE 8 • FINANCE INCOME & FINANCE EXPENSES
Finance income
Interest income
Foreign exchange gains
Finance expenses
Interest expense
Interest expense - Lease Liabilities
Interest expense - Contract Liabilities
Net financing costs
(2,784,531)
(2,247,146)
(2,067,562)
(1,425,983)
5,087,569
4,344,607
4,263,967
3,084,142
2,424,626
2,140,135
2,163,888
1,448,655
2,662,943
2,204,472
2,100,079
1,635,487
GROUP
2019
$
19,645
9,239
28,884
(2,178,386)
(151,456)
(486,141)
(2,815,983)
(2,787,099)
2018
$
Restated
13,453
84,241
97,694
(1,259,442)
(147,777)
(489,670)
(1,896,889)
(1,799,195)
(a) Reconciliation of effective tax rate
Profit/(Loss) before income tax
GROUP
2019
$
2018
$
Restated
(5,106,419)
(5,883,056)
Income tax using the Company’s domestic tax rate of 28%
(1,429,796)
(1,647,256)
Reduction in tax rate
Non-deductible expense/(non-assessable income)
Temporary differences
Losses and timing differences (recognised)/not recognised
Effect of different tax rates
Income tax expense/(benefit)
(b) Current tax (benefit)/expense
Current year
-
963,987
-
274,610
(121,090)
24,909
(840,233)
157,438
(191,199)
(2,426,232)
(36,406)
(36,406)
107,774
107,774
(154,791)
(2,534,006)
(154,791)
(2,534,006)
GROUP
2019
$
2018
$
Restated
9,334,583
(1,271,278)
(3,601,548)
2,582,438
262,047
(151,356)
7,160,471
9,085,688
(277,215)
(3,826,229)
948,053
191,046
704,659
6,826,002
At 31 March 2019 there were no imputation credits available to shareholders (2018: Nil)
NOTE 10 • DEFERRED TAX ASSETS / (LIABILITIES)
Recognised deferred tax assets and liabilities
Deferred tax assets and (liabilities) are attributable to the following:
Tax loss carry forward
Property, plant and equipment
Deferred development expenditure
Provisions, accruals and other liabilities
Equity-settled share-based payments
Revenue recognition
Total deferred tax asset/(liability)
The movement in temporary differences has been recognised in profit or loss. Deferred tax assets have been recognised at a
rates between 21% to 30% at which they are expected to be realised.
4,344,607
3,590,888
3,084,142
1,862,992
(c) Deferred tax (benefit)/expense
3,527,493
3,000,865
3,247,387
2,647,133
Current year
EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
88
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
89
NOTE 10 • DEFERRED TAX ASSETS / (LIABILITIES) (CONTINUED)
NOTE 11 • PAID UP CAPITAL
Changes in
tax rates
Currency
Translation
Balance
31-Mar-18
Movement in
Period
$
$
Restated
$
Restated
Balance
31-Mar-17
$
Restated
All issued shares are fully paid up and have equal voting rights and share equally in dividends and surplus on winding up.
GROUP
At 31 March 2017
Number of
ordinary shares
Issue price
$
Issued Capital
$
60,245,660
58,965,367
Issue of shares to staff under LTI schemes
490,000
$2.15
1,053,500
Movement in temporary differences during the period:
Group
Tax loss carry
forward
Property, plant
and equipment
Deferred
development
expenditure
Provisions,
accruals and
other liabilities
Equity-settled
share-based
payments
Revenue
recognition
Balance
31-Mar-19
Recognised in
profit or loss
Under/(over)
from prior
periods
$
$
$
9,334,583
275,236
(71,410)
(1,271,278)
(1,088,027)
(3,601,548)
224,681
-
-
2,582,438
1,429,604
188,760
267,632
76,586
-
(151,356)
(994,220)
149,989
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
45,069
9,085,688
2,228,927
6,856,761
93,964
(277,215)
633,713
(910,928)
-
(3,826,229)
(878,256)
(2,947,973)
16,021
948,053
75,108
872,945
-
191,046
64,662
126,384
(11,784)
704,659
337,743
366,916
Total
7,160,471
(76,140)
267,339
-
143,270
6,826,002
2,461,897
4,364,105
The New Zealand tax group consists of EROAD Limited, EROAD New Zealand Limited and EROAD Financial Services Limited.
Losses incurred within this Group are transferred within the Group with no compensation being recognised. Deferred tax assets
have been recognised in respect of these items as based on the expected profitability of the New Zealand tax Group it is considered
future taxable profit will be available for utilisation against the carried forward losses.
Determining the extent to which losses will be utilised requires judgement. The Group has forecast expected utilisation of tax losses.
Key assumptions included Total Contracted Unit, revenue and expense forecasts in line with Groups budget and three-year forecast
supported by a robust strategic and business planning process, in addition to the estimated impact of group transfer pricing
policies and the forecast impact of timing differences.
The results of the forecasting indicate that there will be sufficient profitability within the New Zealand tax group to utilise the
existing tax losses. Losses incurred in recent years have been the result of large investment creating the new North American
market. Whilst the business is now entering a new market in Australia, the Group considers this can be achieved at a lower cost than
the entry into North America, by leveraging our New Zealand expertise and cost and customer base. The Group expect to be able
to report significant improvements in profitability over the next three years as the business reaches a sufficiently large subscriber
base to self-fund operating and corporate costs. Due to the cumulative subscription nature of our business model as well as certain
operating expenses that do not scale at the same rate of unit and revenue growth, the business is expected to able to achieve its
forecast growth in profitability.
The Group performed sensitivity analysis on the forecast utilisation of tax losses by reducing forecast transfer pricing charges to
overseas subsidiaries by 50%. Under both base case and sensitivity scenario, the Group expects that unused tax losses will be
utilised within 4 years.
Held in trust as treasury stock
Vested under LTS scheme
Shares issued to employees for 2017 bonus
Vested under LTI scheme
Shares issued in December 2017 Equity Placement
Shares issued in March 2018 Share Purchase Plan
Costs of raising capital
At 31 March 2018
Vested under LTS scheme
Shares issued to employees for 2018 bonus
Shares issued to employees for 2018 bonus
Issue of shares to staff under LTI schemes
Held in trust as treasury stock
281,351
5,099,247
1,973,673
68,089,931
18,136
54,000
$1.65
$3.04
$3.04
(1,053,500)
37,818
463,976
31,223
15,501,711
6,000,000
(673,657)
80,326,438
34,425
59,999
191,561
116,705
$3.89
453,959
(453,959)
80,612,423
At 31 March 2019
68,278,772
At 31 March 2019 there was 68,278,772 authorised and issued ordinary shares (2018: 68,089,931). 972,484 (2018: 906,783) shares
are held in trust for employees in relation to the long-term incentive plan and are accounted for as treasury stock.
On 15 December 2017, the Company issued 5,099,247 new shares at a price of $3.04 per share under an equity placement which
raised $15,501,711. Additionally on 6 March 2018, the company allotted an additional 1,973,673 new shares relating to $6,000,000
raised under a share purchase plan at a price of $3.04 per share.
The calculation of both basic and diluted earnings per share at 31 March 2019 was based on the profit attributable to ordinary
shareholders of ($4,900,057) (2018: $209,616). The weighted number of ordinary shares was 67,283,918 (2018: 61,668,093) for
basic earnings per share and 67,903,457 for diluted earnings per share (2018: 62,027,558).
Other components of equity include:
• Translation reserve - comprises foreign currency translation differences arising from the translation of financial statements of
the Group’s foreign subsidiaries into New Zealand Dollars.
• Retained earnings - includes all current and prior period retained profits and share-based employee remuneration.
EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
90
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
91
NOTE 12 • CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH
NOTE 14 • PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Cash and bank
GROUP
2019
$
2018
$
16,138,806
21,870,415
16,138,806
21,870,415
Cash and cash equivalents exclude restricted bank accounts. Restricted bank accounts are presented separately from cash and
cash equivalents on the face of the Statement of Financial Position and movements in restricted bank accounts are excluded
from the Statement of Cash Flows. The restricted bank accounts relate to Road Users tax collected from clients due for payment
to the appropriate government agency.
NOTE 13 • TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES
Trade receivables
Expected credit losses
Prepayments and other receivables
GROUP
2019
$
6,519,453
(675,207)
5,844,246
4,657,877
10,502,123
2018
$
Restated
8,251,355
(555,073)
7,696,282
3,930,137
11,626,419
In addition to the movement in the expected credit losses, the Group has written off $343,919 (2018: $56,334) of bad debts to
the statement of comprehensive income during the year ended 31 March 2019. The Group’s trade receivables are subject to NZ
IFRS 9’s expected credit loss model. The Group has applied the NZ IFRS 9 simplified approach to measuring expected credit
losses which uses a lifetime expected credit loss allowance and the future collectabillity for all trade receivables.
(a) Credit risk
The aging of the Group’s Trade receivables at the reporting date was as follows:
GROUP
Not past due
Past due 1-30 days
Past due 31-60 days
Past due over 61 days
Allowance for
doubtful debts
2019
Gross 2019
Allowance for
doubtful debts
2018
Gross 2018
$
$
$
$
3,703,562
(28,048)
3,914,796
(14,600)
1,340,992
(34,678)
1,732,962
476,940
(39,017)
843,233
(80,123)
(56,801)
GROUP
Right of Use
Assets
Hardware
Assets
Plant and
equipment
Leasehold
improvements
Motor
vehicles
Office
equipment
Computers
Total
$
Restated
$
Restated
$
$
Restated
$
$
$
$
Restated
Year ended 31 March 2018
Opening net book amount as
originally presented
Adjustment on application
of NZ IFRS 15 & NZ IFRS 16
Opening net book amount
- restated
Additions
Disposals
-
21,718,976
128,198
579,147
414,148
438,158
485,310 23,763,937
2,171,904
(7,990,481)
-
(36)
-
-
-
(5,818,613)
2,171,904
13,728,495
128,198
579,111
414,148
438,158
485,310
17,945,324
-
-
10,840,240
158,808
-
-
-
-
166,935
(42,170)
81,657
51,028
11,298,668
-
(3,205)
(45,375)
Depreciation charge
(649,520)
(3,775,467)
(69,011)
(132,901)
(165,270)
(202,180)
(367,042)
(5,361,391)
Depreciation recovered
Effect of movement in
exchange rates
-
-
(18,522)
2,884
-
-
-
34,633
-
623
35,256
(5,726)
-
(2,112)
(779)
(24,255)
Closing net book amount
1,503,862
20,796,152
217,995
440,484
408,276
315,523
165,935
23,848,227
Cost
4,119,234
31,721,956
506,729
1,096,375
930,918
1,013,773
2,570,002
41,958,987
Accumulated depreciation
(2,615,372)
(10,925,804)
(288,734)
(655,891)
(522,642)
(698,250)
(2,404,067)
(18,110,760)
Net book amount
1,503,862
20,796,152
217,995
440,484
408,276
315,523
165,935
23,848,227
GROUP
Right of Use
Assets
Hardware
Assets
Plant and
equipment
Leasehold
improvements
Motor
vehicles
Office
equipment
Computers
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Total
$
Year ended 31 March 2019
Opening net book amount as
originally presented
Adjustment on application
of NZ IFRS 15 & NZ IFRS 16
Opening net book amount
- restated
Additions
Disposals
-
26,789,392
217,995
440,547
408,276
315,523
165,935
28,337,668
1,503,862
(5,993,240)
-
(63)
-
-
- (4,489,441)
1,503,862
20,796,152
217,995
440,484
408,276
315,523
165,935
23,848,227
5,383,428
8,678,488
120,612
1,355,856
242,670
97,313
255,583
16,133,950
(2,680,438)
-
-
(8,394)
(132,376)
-
-
(2,821,208)
Depreciation charge
(758,290)
(5,119,426)
(91,019)
(172,795)
(168,650)
(144,562)
(166,530)
(6,621,272)
Depreciation recovered
2,516,661
913,552
Effect of movement in
exchange rates
60,370
(260,410)
-
-
3,172
95,953
-
-
3,529,338
21,744
11
8,163
2,376
(167,746)
997,959
(573,464)
1,760,364
(403,549)
Closing net book amount
6,025,593
25,008,356
247,588
1,640,067
445,884
276,437
257,364
33,901,289
6,519,453
(675,207)
8,251,355
(555,073)
Cost
6,915,085
40,362,799
627,342
2,478,465
1,041,213
1,131,121
2,837,173
55,393,198
Accumulated depreciation
(889,492)
(15,354,443)
(379,754)
(838,398)
(595,329)
(854,684)
(2,579,809)
(21,491,909)
Net book amount
6,025,593
25,008,356
247,588
1,640,067
445,884
276,437
257,364
33,901,289
Included in the Hardware Assets is equipment under construction of $6,996,599 (2018: $5,219,062).
EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
92
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
93
NOTE 15 • LEASES AS A LESSEE
NOTE 16 • INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Property, plant and equipment’ disclosed in Note 14 comprises owned and leased assets.
GROUP
Patents
Trade Marks
Development
Software
Right-of-use assets - Property leases
2019
$
6,025,593
6,025,593
GROUP
2018
$
1,503,862
1,503,862
Note
14
The Group leases relate to land and buildings for its office space. The leases of office space typically run for a period of 1 to 9 years. Some
leases provide for additional rent payments that are based on changes in local price indices. Information about leases for which the Group
is a lessee is presented below.
Right-of-use assets
Opening Net Book Value
Additions
Disposals
Depreciation
Depreciation recovered
Effect of movement in exchange rates
Closing Net Book Value
Note
14
Lease Liabilities
Maturity analysis - contractual undiscounted cash flows
Less than one year
One to five years
More than five years
Total undiscounted lease liabilities
Lease liabilities included in the statement of financial position
Current
Non-current
Amounts recognised in Statement of Comprehensive Income
Interest expense on lease liabilties
Amounts recognised in Statement of Cash Flows
GROUP
GROUP
2019
$
1,503,862
5,383,428
(2,680,438)
(758,290)
2,516,661
60,370
6,025,593
2019
$
1,174,643
4,564,648
3,055,900
8,795,191
7,029,309
782,450
6,246,859
GROUP
GROUP
2019
$
151,456
2019
$
2018
$
2,171,904
-
-
(649,520)
-
(18,522)
1,503,862
2018
$
902,045
1,401,723
-
2,303,768
2,065,714
801,024
1,264,690
2018
$
147,777
2018
$
Total cash outflow for leases
921,029
754,884
$
$
$
$
Total
$
Year ended 31 March 2018
Opening net book amount
Additions
Disposals
Amortisation charge
Closing net book amount
Cost
Accumulated amortisation
Net book amount
14,651
32,576
26,197,426
2,418,124
28,662,777
-
-
(350)
14,301
17,800
(3,499)
14,301
-
-
-
5,309,736
1,523,347
6,833,083
-
-
-
(4,654,532)
(939,509)
(5,594,391)
32,576
26,852,630
3,001,962
29,901,469
32,576
37,995,348
5,530,206
43,575,930
-
(11,142,718)
(2,528,244)
(13,674,461)
32,576
26,852,630
3,001,962
29,901,469
GROUP
Patents
Trade Marks
Development
Software
$
$
$
$
Total
$
Year ended 31 March 2019
Opening net book amount
Additions
Disposals
Amortisation charge
Closing net book amount
Cost
Accumulated amortisation
Net book amount
14,301
32,576
26,852,630
3,001,962
29,901,469
-
-
(2,037)
12,264
17,800
(5,536)
12,264
-
-
-
8,334,871
1,375,079
9,709,950
-
-
-
(5,423,152)
(1,053,945)
(6,479,134)
32,576
29,764,349
3,323,096
33,132,285
32,576
46,330,219
6,905,285
53,285,880
-
(16,565,870)
(3,582,189)
(20,153,595)
32,576
29,764,349
3,323,096
33,132,285
The useful lives of the Group’s Intangible Assets are assessed to be finite. Assets with finite lives are amortised over their
useful lives and tested for impairment whenever there are indications that the assets may be impaired. Where an indicator
of impairment exists the Group makes a formal assessment of the recoverable amount. Where the carrying value of an asset
exceeds its recoverable amount, the asset is considered impaired and is written down to its recoverable amount. The recoverable
amount is the greater of fair value less costs to sell of the assets value in use. For the purposes of assessing impairment, assets
are Grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash flows (cash-generating units).
Recoverability of development costs
Included in the carrying amount of development costs at 31 March 2019 is an amount of $13,371,021 (2018: $12,822,744) relating to
our North American Market. Management note unit sales within the North American Market were lower than originally expected
and as a result management has carried out an impairment test.
The recoverable amount of the CGU that these corporate assets relate to (North American Market) was estimated based on the
present value of future cash flows expected to be derived from the CGU (value in use).
Key assumptions included for the impairment review included Total Contracted Unit, revenue and expense forecasts in line with
Groups budget and three-year forecast, a pre-tax discount rate of 14% and a terminal growth rate of 1.9%. Sensitivity analysis
was performed by reducing forecasted non-committed Contracted Unit growth by 50% over the forecast period at base case
discount and terminal growth rates. A separate sensitivity analysis was performed by increasing the discount rate to 20% and
lowering the terminal growth rate to 1.4% at base case Contracted Unit and Revenue growth. The results of both sensitivity
scenarios still resulted in headroom between the recoverable amount of the CGU and its carrying value.
The Group concluded that the recoverable amount of the CGU to be higher than its carrying value and therefore no impairment
was considered necessary.
EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
94
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
95
NOTE 17 • TRADE PAYABLES AND ACCRUALS
Trade creditors
Sundry accruals
NOTE 18 • BORROWINGS
Current borrowings
Term Loans - NZ $ denominated
Term Loans - US $ denominated
NZ Growth Funding - Committed Cash Advance Facility
US Growth Funding - Committed Cash Advance Facility
Capitalised borrowing costs
Non-current borrowings
Term Loans - NZ $ denominated
Term Loans - US $ denominated
NZ Growth - Committed Cash Advance Facility
US Growth - Committed Cash Advance Facility
Terms and debt repayment schedule
2019
$
3,521,884
2,589,546
6,111,430
2019
$
6,149,240
8,476,936
1,809,997
800,743
(74,249)
17,162,667
1,499,620
10,239,608
4,288,939
1,447,862
17,476,029
GROUP
GROUP
2018
$
Restated
2,471,662
2,387,462
4,859,124
2018
$
7,425,008
1,564,784
1,102,579
716,622
(234,304)
10,574,689
9,448,670
2,636,790
2,482,044
1,341,166
15,908,670
Nominal
Interest
Year of
Maturity
2019
Face Value
2019
Carrying
amount
2018
Face Value
2018
Carrying
Amount
5.00%
5.55%
4.47%
2020
2020
2020
$
$
$
$
6,818,881
6,818,881
16,873,678
16,873,678
19,546,523
19,546,523
4,201,574
4,201,574
6,098,936
6,098,936
3,584,623
3,584,623
4.98%
2020
2,248,605
2,248,605
2,057,788
2,057,788
Term Loans - NZ $ denominated
Term Loans - US $ denominated
NZ Growth - Committed Cash Advance
Facility
US Growth - Committed Cash Advance
Facility
Capitalised borrowing costs
-
2020
-
(74,249)
-
(234,304)
34,712,945
34,638,696
26,717,663
26,483,359
NOTE 18 • BORROWINGS (CONTINUED)
On 3 July 2017, in order to support funding requirements in connection with the Group’s growth and to manage the related working
capital requirements, the Company entered into a Multi-Option Credit Facility Agreement with the Bank of New Zealand (BNZ). The
agreement was subsequently amended and restated in December 2017 and October 2018. At 31 March 2019, EROAD had the following
facilities in place:
$5,250,000 Term Loan Facility A – to restructure existing term facilities. The Term Loan has a term of 24 months from the October
refinance date, with the facility having a maturity date in October 2020. The interest rate is variable based on the 3-month BKBM bid
plus a margin of 3.10%. Principal and interest payments are made quarterly in line with a 30 month repayment profile.
$5,998,480 (NZD) Term Loan Facility B – used to restructure the Outstanding Amount under the Committed Cash Advances Facility
as at the First Amendment Date in December 2017. The Term Loan has a term of 24 months from the October 2018 refinance date, with
the facility having a maturity date in October 2020. The interest rate is variable based on the 3-month BKBM bid plus a margin of 3.10%.
Principal and interest payments are made quarterly in line with a 33 month repayment profile.
$2,182,057 (USD) Term Loan Facility B – used to restructure the Outstanding Amount under the Committed Cash Advances Facility as
at the First Amendment Date in December 2017. The Term Loan has a term of 24 months from the October 2018 refinance date, with
the facility having a maturity date in October 2020. The interest rate is variable based on the 3-month US LIBOR plus a margin of 3.10%.
Principal and interest payments are made quarterly in line with a 33 month repayment profile.
$12,966,043 (NZD) Term Loan Facility E – used to restructure the Outstanding Amount under the Committed Cash Advances Facility
as at the Second Amendment Date in October 2018. The Term Loan has a term of 24 months from the October 2018 refinance date,
with the facility having a maturity date in October 2020. The interest rate is variable based on the 3-month BKBM bid plus a margin of
3.10%. Principal and interest payments are made quarterly in line with a 33 month repayment profile.
$3,264,184 (USD) Term Loan Facility E – used to restructure the Outstanding Amount under the Committed Cash Advances Facility as
at the Second Amendment Date in October 2018. The Term Loan has a term of 24 months from the October 2018 refinance date, with
the facility having a maturity date in October 2020. The interest rate is variable based on the 3-month US LIBOR plus a margin of 3.10%.
Principal and interest payments are made quarterly in line with a 33 month repayment profile.
$20,000,000 Committed Cash Advance Facility – to finance the up-front costs in connection with securing Future Contracted Income.
The Committed Cash Advance Facility has a 16 month term from the December refinance date, with the facility having a maturity date
in October 2020. Structurally the facility is paid down and redrawn (revolving credit) each time the Company presents a certificate
outlining the Group’s growth in new Future Contracted Income on a monthly basis. For drawings in New Zealand Dollars of a 1-month
duration, the interest rate is the 1-month BKBM plus margin of 2.50%. For drawings in USD of a 1-month duration, the interest rate is the
1 month US LIBOR plus a margin of 2.50%. In addition to a 1.50% line fee on the total facility limit, payable quarterly in advance.
$5,150,000 Overdraft Facilities – for general working capital purposes. This is an on demand facility with the interest rate based on the
Market Connect Overdraft Prime Rate plus a margin of 1%.
EROAD’s operating covenants to support the above facilities include Loan to Total FCI Ratio, Interest Cover Ratio, Total Assets
(Obligators) to Total Assets (Group) ratio, and an umbrella limit on the aggregate of all facilities being below $40,000,000. EROAD was
compliant with all covenants during the period and at 31 March 2019.
The security package for the Multi-Option Credit Facility Agreement includes an all obligations cross-guarantee granted by EROAD
Australia Pty Limited and EROAD Inc in favour of the BNZ in respect of the obligations of EROAD Limited, and a General Security
Agreements granted by EROAD Limited, EROAD Inc and EROAD Australia Pty Limited in favour of the BNZ as secured parties.
NOTE 19 • CONTRACT LIABILITIES
The Group enters into contracts with customers for the provision of software services over a contracted period. As stated in the
accounting policies, this revenue is recognised over time as the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefit
of the service. The Group has determined that the benefit of the services provided is consumed evenly over the period of the
contract, and thus the performance obligations are satisfied evenly over the period. Where the Group receives a portion of the
transaction price of a contract in advance, this is recognised as a contract liability and released over the contract period as the
Group satisfies its performance obligations.
EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
96
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
97
NOTE 19 • CONTRACT LIABILITIES (CONTINUED)
NOTE 20 • FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (CONTINUED)
Opening balance
Amounts deferred during the period
Amount recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income
Current
Non-current
GROUP
2019
$
10,173,952
5,048,743
2018
$
Restated
8,068,907
7,770,427
(5,255,272)
(5,665,382)
9,967,423
5,757,951
4,209,472
10,173,952
5,434,881
4,739,071
At 31 March 2019, $5,757,951 is expected to be recognised in the statement of comprehensive income in the next financial period
and has been classified as current in the balance sheet (2018: $5,434,881).
NOTE 20 • FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT
The Group’s principal financial instruments include trade receivables and payables, cash and short term deposits, and advances from
Group companies.
As a result of the Group’s operations and sources of finance, it is exposed to credit risk, liquidity risk and market risks which include foreign
currency risk, commodity price risk and interest rate risk. These risks are described below.
The Board of Directors has overall responsibility for the establishment and oversight of the Group’s risk management framework. The
Group’s risk management policies are established to identify and analyse the financial risks faced by the Group, to set appropriate risk
limits and controls, and to monitor risks and adherence to limits. Risk management policies and systems are reviewed regularly to reflect
changes in market conditions and the Group’s activities.
Details of the significant accounting policies and methods adopted, including the criteria for recognition, the basis of measurement and the
basis upon which income and expenses are recognised, in respect of each class of financial asset and financial liability are disclosed in note 1.
The Group holds the following financial assets and liabilities:
GROUP
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted bank account
Trade receivables
Financial liabilities
Borrowings
Employee Entitlements
Contract liabilities
Lease liabilities
Trade and other payables
Payables to NZTA and ODOT
2019
$
$
Restated
2018
$
Restated
$
Amortised costs
Other
amortised cost
Loans and
receivables
Other
amortised cost
16,138,806
12,672,741
6,519,453
35,331,000
-
-
-
-
21,870,415
9,498,071
8,251,355
39,619,841
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
34,638,696
1,338,026
9,967,423
7,029,309
6,111,430
12,488,871
71,573,755
-
-
-
-
-
26,483,359
1,147,462
10,173,952
2,065,714
4,859,124
9,439,139
54,168,750
(a) Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Group if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual
obligations, and it arises principally from the Group’s trade receivables from customers in the normal course of business.
The Group’s exposure to credit risk is influenced mainly by the individual characteristics of each customer. The creditworthiness of
a customer or counterparty is determined by a number of qualitative and quantitative factors. Qualitative factors include external
credit ratings (where available), payment history and strategic importance of customer or counterparty. Quantitative factors include
transaction size, net assets of customer or counterparty, and ratio analysis on liquidity, cash flow and profitability.
In relation to trade receivables, it is the Group’s policy that all customers who wish to trade on terms are subject to credit verification
on an ongoing basis with the intention of minimising bad debts. The nature of the Group’s trade receivables is represented by regular
turnover of product and billing of customers based on the Group’s contractual payment terms. In North America, the Group requires
that customers under a certain fleet size to purchase the hardware with an upfront payment regardless of credit verification.
The Group establishes an allowance for impairment that represents its estimate of incurred losses in respect of trade and other
receivables. The main components of this allowance are a specific loss component that relates to individually significant exposures, and
a collective loss component established for Groups of similar assets in respect of losses that have been incurred but not yet identified.
The carrying amount of the Group’s financial assets represents the maximum credit exposure as summarised above.
Refer to note 13 for an aging profile for the Group’s trade receivables at reporting date.
(b) Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will not be able to meet its financial obligations as and when they become due and payable.
The Group’s approach to managing liquidity risk is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will always have sufficient liquidity to meet its
liabilities when they become due and payable, under both normal and stressed conditions, without incurring unacceptable losses or
risking damage to the Group’s reputation.
The Group ensures that it has sufficient cash on demand to meet expected operational expenses for a period of 90 days, including the
servicing of financial obligations; this excludes the potential impact of extreme circumstances that cannot reasonably be predicted,
such as natural disasters.
Maturities of financial liabilities
The following table details the Group’s contractual maturities of financial liabilities, including estimated interest payments and
excluding the impact of netting agreements, as at the reporting date.
Refer to note 15 for the maturity profile.
GROUP
2019
Non-derivative financial liabilities
Borrowings
Employee Entitlements
Lease liabilities
Trade and other payables
Payable to NZTA & ODOT
1 year or less
Over 1 to 5
years
$
17,236,916
17,476,029
1,338,026
-
782,450
6,246,859
6,111,430
12,488,871
-
-
37,957,693
23,722,888
Over 5
years
Total contractual
cash flows
Carrying amount of
liabilities
$
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
34,712,945
34,638,696
1,338,026
7,029,309
6,111,430
1,338,026
7,029,309
6,111,430
12,488,871
12,488,871
61,680,581
61,606,332
EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
98
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
99
NOTE 20 • FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (CONTINUED)
NOTE 20 • FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (CONTINUED)
GROUP
2018
Non-derivative financial liabilities
Borrowings
Employee Entitlements
Lease liabilities
Trade and other payables
Payable to NZTA & ODOT
1 year or less
$
Restated
Over 1 to 5
years
$
Restated
Over 5
years
Total contractual
cash flows
Carrying amount of
liabilities
$
Restated
$
Restated
$
Restated
10,808,993
15,908,670
1,147,462
-
801,024
1,264,690
4,859,124
9,439,139
-
-
27,055,742
17,173,360
-
-
-
-
-
-
26,717,663
26,483,359
1,147,462
2,065,714
4,859,124
9,439,139
1,147,462
2,065,714
4,859,124
9,439,139
44,229,102
43,994,798
Whilst each drawdown has a maximum 365 day term, the Company has the ability to re-draw amounts until the end of the term of the
facility, as a result the loan has been classified as non-current and prior year comparatives have been restated to align with the current
year presentation.
(c) Market risk
Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as commodity prices, foreign exchange rates and interest rates, will affect the
Group’s income or the value of its holdings of financial instruments. The objective of market risk management is to manage and control
market risk exposures within acceptable parameters, while optimising the return on risk.
Foreign currency risk
The Group is exposed to currency risk on sales transactions that are denominated in a currency other than the respective functional
currencies of Group entities, primarily the US Dollars (USD) and Australian Dollar (AUD). The Group, may on occasion, enter into
forward exchange contracts to hedge the exposure to foreign currency fluctuations on sales receipts.
The Group reports in New Zealand dollars. Movements in foreign currency exchange rates affect reported financial results, financial
position and cash flows. Where practical, the Group attempts to reduce this risk by matching revenues and expenditures, as well as
assets and liabilities, by country and by currency.
Foreign exchange rates applied against the New Zealand Dollar, at 31 March are as follows:
AUD 1
USD 1
2019
$
0.95
0.68
2018
$
0.94
0.72
The Group’s exposure to foreign currency risk at the reporting date was as follows (all amounts are denominated in New Zealand Dollars):
2019
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade receivables
Lease liabilities
Borrowings
2018
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade receivables
Lease liabilities
Borrowings
AUD
$
77,131
119,998
-
-
AUD
$
Restated
7,866
111,780
-
-
USD
$
1,928,808
2,009,891
804,191
20,965,149
USD
$
Restated
1,122,704
1,909,317
979,593
6,259,362
Interest rate risk
At the reporting date the interest rate profile of the Group’s interest-bearing financial instruments was:
GROUP
Term Loans - NZ $ denominated
Term Loans - US $ denominated
NZ Growth - Committed Cash Advance Facility
US Growth - Committed Cash Advance Facility
Net exposure to interest rate risk
%
5.00%
5.55%
4.47%
4.98%
2019
Carrying
amount
$
7,648,860
18,716,544
6,098,936
2,248,605
34,712,945
%
$
5.12%
4.93%
4.29%
3.99%
2018
Carrying
amount
$
16,873,678
4,201,574
3,584,623
2,057,788
26,717,663
Summarised sensitivity analysis
The following table summarises the sensitivity of the Group’s financial assets and financial liabilities to foreign currency risk and interest
rate risk.
GROUP
2019
-10%
+10%
-100bps
+100bps
Profit
$
Equity
$
Profit
$
Equity
$
Profit
$
Equity
$
Profit
$
Equity
$
Cash and cash equivalents
(138,486)
(138,486)
138,486
138,486
(161,388)
(161,388)
161,388
161,388
Trade receivables
Borrowings
(148,072)
(148,072)
148,072
148,072
-
-
-
-
(1,425,630)
(1,425,630)
1,425,630
1,425,630
347,129
347,129
(347,129)
(347,129)
Total increase/ (decrease)
(1,712,188)
(1,712,188)
1,712,188
1,712,188
185,742
185,742
(185,742)
(185,742)
GROUP
2018
-10%
+10%
-100bps
+100bps
Profit
$
Restated
Equity
$
Restated
Profit
$
Restated
Equity
$
Restated
Profit
$
Equity
$
Profit
$
Equity
$
Cash and cash equivalents
(81,574)
(81,574)
81,574
81,574
(218,704)
(218,704)
218,704
218,704
Trade receivables
(147,978)
(147,978)
147,978
Borrowings
(450,674)
(450,674)
450,674
147,978
450,674
Total increase/ (decrease)
(680,226)
(680,226)
680,226
680,226
-
267,177
48,473
-
-
-
267,177
(267,177)
(267,177)
48,473
(48,473)
(48,473)
(1)The foreign currency sensitivity above represents a 10% decrease and increase in spot foreign exchange rates.
(2)The interest rate sensitivity above represents a 100 basis point (bps) decrease and increase in variable interest rates.
(d) Capital management
The Group’s policy is to maintain a strong capital base so as to maintain investor, creditor and market confidence and to sustain future
development of the business. The Board monitors the return on capital employed, which the Group defines as reported EBIT (Earnings
Before Interest and Tax) divided by capital employed.
(e) Fair value measurement
The carrying amounts of the Groups financial assets and liabilities approximate their fair value due to their short maturity periods or fixed
rate nature.
EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
100
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
101
NOTE 21 • SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS
At 31 March 2019, the Group had the following share-based payment arrangements.
EROAD LTI Plan (equity-settled)
Eligible employees were invited to purchase EROAD shares under the EROAD LTI plan. Under the terms of the scheme the purchase of
the shares is funded by a loan granted to the eligible employees by EROAD Limited. At the end of the vesting period the employee will
be paid a net bonus in relation to the shares that vest to the employee, equal to the amount of their loan outstanding to the Company,
enabling the loan to be repaid.
Shares issued under the scheme are held in trust for the employees during a 3 year restrictive period. If the employee ceases to be an
employee during the restrictive period the Trustees will repurchase the employees shares at the original issue price.
The eligible employees must meet certain performance conditions during each year of the restrictive period, as determined by the
remuneration committee and approved by the board. 50% of the scheme shares initially granted will be forfeited for each year the
participant fails to achieve their performance conditions. Additionally the employee’s shares will also be forfeited if the enterprise value of
the Company has not doubled by the end of the restrictive period.
Employee’s shares that are forfeited due to failure to meet market and non-market performance conditions will be repurchased by the
Trustee at the original grant date price.
The EROAD LTI Plan has been accounted for as grant of shares to employees in accordance with NZ IFRS 2. The key terms and conditions
relating to the grants under this Scheme are disclosed in the table below.
EROAD US President Incentive Scheme
The US President was invited to purchase EROAD shares under the EROAD US President Incentive Scheme. Under the terms of the
scheme the purchase of the shares is funded by a loan granted to the employee by EROAD Limited. At the end of the vesting period the
employee will be paid a net bonus in relation to the shares that vest to the employee, equal to the amount of their loan outstanding to the
Company, enabling the loan to be repaid.
Shares issued under the scheme are held in trust for the employee during a 3 year restrictive period. If the employee ceases to be an
employee during the restrictive period the Trustees will repurchase the employees shares at the original issue price.
EROAD US President Incentive
Scheme
490,000
-
Key operational measures and targets for the North American business are outlined in the employees grant letter, these include Total
Contract Units, Average Revenue Per Unit, Customer Acquisition Cost Payback Period, and Renewal Rate targets. Each operational
measure has a percentage weighting for each of the three-year periods, with the performance for each year being calculated based on
the percentage of target achieved multiplied by the percentage weighting for each operational measures. The total percentage of shares
to vest at the end of the restrictive period is calculated based on the average percentage performance over the three years. If the total
average performance is less than 60% then all shares granted under the scheme will be forfeited.
Employee’s shares that are forfeited due to failure to meet the non-market performance conditions will be repurchased by the Trustee at
the original grant date price.
The EROAD US President Incentive Scheme has been accounted for as grant of shares to employees in accordance with NZ IFRS 2. The
key terms and conditions relating to the grants under this Scheme are disclosed in the table below.
EROAD’s LTI Plan II (equity-settled)
Eligible employees were invited to purchase EROAD shares under the EROAD LTI plan. Under the terms of the scheme the purchase of
the shares is funded by a loan granted to the eligible employees by EROAD Limited. At the end of the vesting period the employee will
be paid a net bonus in relation to the shares that vest to the employee, equal to the amount of their loan outstanding to the Company,
enabling the loan to be repaid.
Shares issued under the scheme are held in trust for the employees during a 3 year restrictive period. If the employee ceases to be an
employee during the restrictive period the Trustees will repurchase the employees shares at the original issue price. For the shares to vest
the Company’s Total Shareholder Return (TSR) must exceed the median TSR of the NZX50 Group over the Relevant Assessment Period,
with a progressive vesting scale for performance between 50th and 75th percentiles, and 100% vesting if company performance is equal
to or above the 75th percentile of the NZX50 Group.
Employee’s shares that are forfeited due to failure to meet market and non-market performance conditions will be repurchased by the
Trustee at the original grant date price.
The EROAD LTI Plan has been accounted for as grant of shares to employees in accordance with NZ IFRS 2. The key terms and conditions
relating to the grants under this Scheme are disclosed in the table below.
Shares granted to other
employees
EROAD LTI Plan II (FY18)
-
87,995
EROAD LTI Plan II (FY19)
-
25,977
490,000
397,138
NOTE 21 • SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS (CONTINUED)
Grant date/employees entitled
Vesting conditions
Vesting period
Shares granted to key
management personnel
Apr-17
Sep-18
EROAD LTI Plan II (FY18)
-
197,890
EROAD LTI Plan II (FY19)
-
85,276
• 3 years service from grant date
• Company’s Total Shareholder Return (TSR) must exceed
the median TSR of the NZX50 Group over the Relevant
Assessment Period (1 April 2017 to 1 April 2021).
• progressive vesting scale for performance between 50th and
75th percentiles, and 100% vesting if company performance
is equal to or above the 75th percentile of the NZX50 Group.
2.5 years
• 3 years service from grant date
• Company’s Total Shareholder Return (TSR) must exceed
the median TSR of the NZX50 Group over the Relevant
Assessment Period (1 April 2018 to 1 April 2021).
• progressive vesting scale for performance between 50th and
75th percentiles, and 100% vesting if company performance
is equal to or above the 75th percentile of the NZX50 Group.
• 3 years service from grant date
• Meet minimum targets for key operational metrics: Total
Contracted Units, Average Revenue per Unit, Cost of
Customer Acquisition Payback and Renewal Rates.
2.5 years
• Each years performance is measured on a weighted
calculation of percentage achieved vs. target for operational
metrics.
3 years
• The percentage of shares to vest is calculated based on the
average of each years weighted percentage achieved. If the
vested amount is less than 60% all shares will be forfeited.
• 3 years service from grant date
• Company’s Total Shareholder Return (TSR) must exceed
the median TSR of the NZX50 Group over the Relevant
Assessment Period (1 April 2017 to 1 April 2021).
• progressive vesting scale for performance between 50th and
75th percentiles, and 100% vesting if company performance is
equal to or above the 75th percentile of the NZX50 Group.
2.5 years
• 3 years service from grant date
• Company’s Total Shareholder Return (TSR) must exceed
the median TSR of the NZX50 Group over the Relevant
Assessment Period (1 April 2018 to 1 April 2021).
• progressive vesting scale for performance between 50th and
75th percentiles, and 100% vesting if company performance is
equal to or above the 75th percentile of the NZX50 Group.
2.5 years
EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
102
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
103
NOTE 21 • SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 25 • RECONCILIATION OF CASH FLOWS
Measurement of fair value
The fair value of the shares issued under the EROAD LTI plans during the year ended 31 March 2019was determined with reference to
the Company’s share price on the NZX at grant date. A discount was applied to the fair value of the shares issued under the EROAD LTI
scheme to reflect the non-vesting market conditions.
The number of shares granted and forfeited during the period were as follows:
Reconciliation of operating cash flows with reported profit/(loss) after tax:
GROUP
2019
$
2018
$
Restated
Outstanding at 1 April
Granted during the period
Forfeited during the period
Vested during the period
Outstanding at 31 March
GROUP
2019
2018
663,475
397,138
(75,982)
(12,144)
972,487
388,168
490,000
(187,522)
(27,171)
663,475
During the year-ended 31 March 2019 an amount of $273,522 (2018: $268,754) was recognised as an expense within the statement of
comprehensive income in relation to share-based payments.
NOTE 22 • CAPITAL COMMITMENTS
At as at 31 March 2019 the Group had confirmed purchase orders open with its third party manufacturer of hardware units amounting to
$734,688 (2018: $6,983,048).
NOTE 23 • CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
During the period, the Group has been approached by a third party who asserts that EROAD infringes a number of its patents. From
our internal review of the patent claims asserted by the other party, the Group believes there are grounds in support for why we do not
infringe their patents and also strong grounds that the patents would likely be considered invalid if EROAD was to challenge them. The
Group strongly asserts that we do not infringe the patents and have informed the other party that we would seek our attorney fees from
them in the event we succeeded in any potential litigation.
As we firmly believe that we not infringed any patents no amounts have been provided for in relation to this claim. The Group may incur
some legal costs in defending this claim over the next twelve months (2018: Nil).
NOTE 24 • EVENTS SUBSEQUENT TO BALANCE DATE
There are no other events subsequent to balance date which have not already been taken up in the accounts (2018: Nil).
Profit/(loss) after tax for the six month period attributable to the shareholders
(4,915,220)
(3,456,824)
Add/(less) non-cash items
Tax asset recognised
Depreciation and amortisation
Other non-cash expenses/(income)
Add/(less) movements in other working capital items:
Decrease/(increase) in trade and other receivables
Decrease/(increase) in finance lease receivables
Decrease/(increase) in current tax receivables
Decrease/(increase) in current tax payables
Increase/(decrease) in contract liabilities
Increase /(decrease) in trade payables, interest payable and accruals
(334,469)
17,952,499
(556,193)
17,061,837
(2,461,897)
14,628,911
617,249
12,784,263
1,124,296
(6,106,886)
-
16,155
(85,245)
(206,529)
1,317,932
2,166,609
2,650
340,456
85,245
2,105,045
(548,605)
(4,122,095)
Net cash from operating activities
14,313,226
5,205,344
NOTE 26 • RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The subsidiaries of the Company are:
Company
Country of Incorporation
Interest %
Principal activity
EROAD Financial Services Ltd
New Zealand
EROAD LTI Trustee Limited
New Zealand
EROAD (Australia) Pty Limited
Australia
EROAD Inc
United States of America
Key management personnel compensation comprised:
100
100
100
100
Financing activities within group
LTI Scheme Trustee
Transport Technology & SaaS
Transport Technology & SaaS
Short-term employee benefits
Share-based payments
2019
2018
2,349,428
2,246,657
194,889
251,593
2,544,317
2,498,250
EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
104
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
105
NOTE 26 • RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (CONTINUED)
(a) Loans to key management personnel
There have been no loans to management personnel.
(b) Other transactions with key management personnel
There were no other transactions with key management personnel during the period. From time to time, key management personnel
of the Group may purchase goods from the Group. These purchases are on the same terms and conditions as those entered into by
other Group employees or customers and are trivial or domestic in nature.
(c) Remuneration of Non-executive Directors
Michael Bushby
Anthony Gibson
Sean Keane (resigned 5 May 2017)
Candace Kinser
Gregg Dal Ponte (resigned 30 April 2019)
Graham Stuart (Chair)
2019
$
82,802
63,000
-
55,000
55,000
96,464
2018
$
85,094
52,546
4,088
50,546
50,546
16,250
352,266
259,070
The following additional fees were paid to certain Directors for additional consultancy work provided to the Company:
Gregg Dal Ponte
(d) Remuneration of Executive director
Salary and bonus
Share-based payments
2019
$
-
-
2019
$
567,120
57,739
2018
$
6,297
6,297
2018
$
555,859
-
624,859
555,859
EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019EROADANNUAL REPORT 2019FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
106
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
107
E
C
N
A
N
R
E
V
O
G
E
T
A
R
O
P
R
O
C
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
108
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
109
Corporate Governance
The Board and management of EROAD are committed to ensuring
that EROAD adheres to best practice governance principles and
maintains the highest ethical standards. The Board reviews and
assesses EROAD’s governance structures to ensure that they are
consistent with best practice.
As at 31 March 2019, EROAD was in full compliance with the NZX Corporate Governance Code
issued in May 2017 (NZX Code). In this Corporate Governance section, each principle of the
NZX Code is provided below with explanation on how EROAD meets each principle.
EROAD’s corporate governance policies, practices and procedures can be found on its website
at http://www.eroadglobal.com/global/investors/.
PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES
EROAD has created an electronic solution to manage and pay road user charges (RUC) and
road tax regimes, support regulatory compliance, including fatigue management and driving
hours, as well as providing value-added commercial services to the heavy and light vehicle
transport sectors. There were no significant changes to EROAD’s principal activities during the
financial year.
PRINCIPLE 1: CODE OF ETHICAL BEHAVIOUR
EROAD expects its employees and directors to maintain high ethical standards. The Code of
Ethics for EROAD sets out these standards and addresses amongst other things:
• confidentiality;
• conflicts of interest and corporate opportunities;
• receipt of gifts and personal benefits;
• expected conduct; and
• reporting concerns regarding breaches of the code, other policies and the law.
The Code of Ethics requires directors and employees to act in the best interests of EROAD, its
shareholders and stakeholders at all times and to not accept from, or offer to, anyone bribes or
improper inducements. Prior to receiving a gift or personal benefit, the Code of Ethics requires
each employee to submit an Approval to Accept Gift form for approval by the CEO or a senior
executive, depending on the value of such gift or personal benefit.
The Code of Ethics specifically addresses EROAD’s commitment to providing equal
employment opportunities. EROAD ensures that its selection process for recruitment and
employee development opportunities are free from bias and are based on merit.
In addition to the Code of Ethics, EROAD maintains the following policies, guides and
registers:
• Guidance on Receiving and Giving Gifts and Hospitality – this document provides guidance to
help employees determine when they should offer or accept a gift or other personal benefits.
• Whistle-blower – this policy encourages employees to come forward if they have concerns
regarding serious wrongdoing, and ensures that employees have access to a confidential
process in which they can report any issues in relation to serious wrongdoing without fear of
reprisal or victimisation.
• Market disclosure - EROAD is committed to the promotion of investor confidence by ensuring
that the trading of EROAD shares takes place in an efficient, competitive and informed market.
EROAD’s Market Disclosure Policy establishes EROAD’s disclosure policies for meeting the
continuous disclosure requirements of the NZX Main Board.
• Securities trading - in accordance with EROAD’s Securities Trading Policy, the NZX Listing
Rules, and the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013, directors and employees of EROAD are
subject to limitations on their ability to buy or sell EROAD shares. The Securities Trading Policy
identifies circumstances where directors, officers, employees and advisers are permitted to
trade, or prohibited from trading, EROAD shares. EROAD is committed to ensuring its directors,
officers, employees and advisers do not trade EROAD shares while in possession of inside
information.
•
Interests register – In accordance with the Companies Act 1993 and the Financial Markets
Conduct Act 2013, EROAD maintains an Interests Register in which all relevant transactions and
matters involving the directors are recorded.
EROAD’s Code of Ethics, Market Disclosure, Securities Trading and Whistle-Blower policies can be
found on EROAD’s website.
PRINCIPLE 2: BOARD COMPOSITION AND PERFORMANCE
Responsibilities of the Board and Executive Management
The business and affairs of EROAD are managed under the direction of the Board of Directors.
At a general level, the Board is elected by shareholders to:
•
in consultation with the CEO, provide strategic direction and approve EROAD’s strategies and
objectives;
• advance major strategies for achieving EROAD’s objectives;
• manage risks;
• determine the overall policy framework within which the business of EROAD is conducted; and
• monitor management’s performance with respect to these matters.
The Board Charter sets internal Board procedure and defines the Board’s specific roles
and responsibilities. The Board delegates management of the day-to-day operations and
responsibilities of EROAD to the executive management team under the leadership of the
Chief Executive Officer to deliver the strategic direction and goals determined by the Board.
Board Composition
At present, there are six directors on the Board, five of which are non-executive directors.
Steven Newman, Chief Executive Officer, is the only executive director on the Board.
On 23 August 2018, Graham Stuart was appointed the Chair of the Board, following Michael
Bushby’s resignation as the Chair on 22 August 2018. Mr Bushby, however, continues to serve
as a director of EROAD. On 28 March 2019 Susan Paterson was appointed as an independent
director of EROAD. Gregg Dal Ponte resigned from the Board on 30 April 2019.
A brief biography of each Board member, including each director’s experience, length of
service, expertise, role and the term of office held at the date of this Annual Report, is set out
in the “Board of Directors” section of this Annual Report.
Independence of Directors
The factors that EROAD takes into account when assessing the independence of its directors
are set out in the Board Charter. A copy of the Board Charter can be found on EROAD’s
website. After consideration of these factors, EROAD is of the view that:
1. no non-executive director is a substantial shareholder of EROAD or an officer of, or otherwise
associated directly with, a substantial shareholder of EROAD.
2. Steven Newman is a director who, within the last five years, has been employed in an executive
capacity by EROAD and is a substantial shareholder.
3. No director has been a principal of a material professional adviser to EROAD, or an employee
materially associated with such service provider, within the last three years.
4. No director is a material supplier or customer of EROAD, or an officer of, or otherwise associated
directly or indirectly with, a material supplier or customer.
5. No director has a material contractual relationship with EROAD other than as a director of EROAD
except as follows: Steven Newman is an employee of EROAD and substantial shareholder.
6. No director has served on the Board for a period which could, or could reasonably be perceived to,
materially interfere with the director’s ability to act in the best interests of EROAD.
7. All directors are free from any close family ties with any person who falls within the above categories.
8. All directors are free from any interest or any business or other relationship which could, or
could reasonably be perceived to, materially interfere with the director’s ability to act in the best
interests of EROAD.
Based on these assessments, EROAD considers that, as at 31 March 2019, Graham Stuart,
Michael Bushby, Tony Gibson, Gregg Dal Ponte1 , Candace Kinser and Susan Paterson were
independent directors.
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
110
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
111
Nomination, appointment, retirement and re-election
In accordance with the current NZX Listing Rules, one third of the directors were required to
offer themselves for re-election by shareholders each year. On and from 1 July 2019, EROAD
will be subject to the new NZX Listing Rules. In accordance with rule 2.7, going forward,
directors will offer themselves for re-election by shareholders every three years. Procedures
for the appointment and removal of directors are also governed by the Constitution and the
Constitution will be updated to reflect the requirements of the new NZX Listing Rules.
In addition to the Constitution, EROAD has an Appointment and Selection of New Directors
Policy which specifies the criteria which the Board will consider during the process of selecting
and appointing new directors. A copy of the policy can be found on EROAD’s website.
The Remuneration, Talent and Nomination Committee identifies and nominates candidates
to fill director vacancies for Board approval. As at 31 March 2019, all new directors were
required to enter into a written agreement with EROAD, which establishes the terms of their
appointment.
Diversity and Inclusion
EROAD and its Board are committed to a workplace culture that promotes and values
diversity and inclusion.
EROAD pursues a broader sense of diversity by recognising, valuing and considering its
employees’ different backgrounds, knowledge, skills, needs and experiences.
The Board recognises that diversity and inclusion lead to a better experience at work for
EROAD’s employees, make teams stronger, lead to greater creativity and performance,
contribute to a more meaningful relationship with customers and stakeholders, and ultimately
increase value to shareholders. When there is a variety of thinking styles, backgrounds,
experiences, perspectives and abilities, employees are more able to understand customers’
needs and to respond effectively to them.
EROAD encourages diversity and inclusion by:
• having a robust recruitment process in place to attract capable, motivated, engaged, creative
and diverse candidates; and
•
fostering a culture and environment of inclusion through various initiatives, policies and
development opportunities.
To deliver on its strategy, EROAD has designed a scalable and diverse organisation with the
right skill-set to grow and mature the company in new markets and geographies. We explain
this in more detail in the “Our people” section of the report.
The Board has adopted a Diversity and Inclusion Policy in accordance with the NZX Code.
The policy is available on EROAD’s website. To ensure continued focus and prioritisation, the
policy requires the Board to set, review and report on measurable objectives for achieving and
promoting diversity across EROAD’s business. While the Board considers that EROAD has
addressed the requirements of the NZX Code, as at 31 March 2019, the Board has not yet set
measurable objectives. Prior to setting measurable objectives, EROAD considers that further
processes need to be put in place to increase awareness and create stronger focus in the area
of diversity and inclusion. EROAD has made progress during FY19 by putting in place the
following key initiatives:
• to help our people learn, develop and achieve their goals, EROAD’s Diversity and Inclusion
Committee has established Lean-in Circles. Participants of each “circle” are encouraged to share
their diverse experiences, mentor each other, celebrate successes, support each other when
there are challenges and grow as leaders as a result;
• senior employees were provided with an opportunity to participate in a leadership training
programme to ensure continued growth and advancement of diverse staff, with a clear pathway
to leadership;
• to ensure ongoing focus in this area, the diversity and inclusion initiatives are now embedded in
the EROAD event calendar. For example, celebration of Matariki, America’s Independence Day,
culture dress day and International Women’s Day;
1 Gregg Dal Ponte resigned from the Board effective 30 April 2019.
• to ensure EROAD creates a family-friendly culture that supports parents in our business, EROAD
has organized family barbeques, a “bring your children to work” day during the teachers’ strike
and a movie evening.
• the value of diversity in EROAD’s sourcing is communicated to the talent acquisition team and
external agencies. Additionally, in its search for an additional Director during FY19, the Board
considered suitably qualified candidates of diverse backgrounds and experience.
The table below shows the respective number of men and women on the Board, in executive
management positions (as “Officers”) and across the whole organisation (including both full
time and part time employees) as at 31 March 2018 and 31 March 2019. 39% of EROAD staff
are now female, which is above average in our industry, and almost one third of our female
employees are in leadership roles.
Board
Officers
Other employees
2018
2019
Women
Men
Women
Men
1
2
72
5
6
121
2
1
99
5
8
151
“Officers” are the Chief Executive Officer and senior executives reporting directly to the Chief
Executive Officer, who are concerned or take part in the management of EROAD.
Board Performance
The Board has a policy in place relating to the performance evaluation of the Board, the
Board’s committees, individual directors and executives. Each year, performance evaluations
take place in relation to the Board, the Board’s committees, individual directors and executives
in accordance with EROAD’s policies.
The Board Charter requires the Board to undertake an annual performance evaluation of itself
that:
• compares the performance of the Board with the requirements of its Charter;
• reviews the performance of the Board’s committees and individual directors; and
• makes improvements to the Board Charter where considered appropriate.
The Board undertook an external performance evaluation which was completed in March 2019.
PRINCIPLE 3: BOARD COMMITTEES
Specific responsibilities are delegated to the Finance, Risk and Audit Committee and the
Remuneration, Talent and Nomination Committee. These Board committees support the
Board by working with management and advisers on relevant issues at a suitably detailed
level and report to the Board. These committees have specific charters setting out objectives,
procedures, composition and responsibilities. Copies of these charters are available on
EROAD’s website.
Finance, Risk and Audit Committee
The primary function of the Finance, Risk and Audit Committee is to assist the Board in
fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to EROAD’s risk management and internal
control framework, the integrity of its financial reporting and EROAD’s auditing processes and
activities. Five meetings of the Finance, Risk and Audit Committee were held during the year
ended 31 March 2019.
Under the Finance, Risk and Audit Committee Charter, the Committee must be comprised
of non-executive directors, all of whom must be independent. Further, the Chair of the
Committee must be an independent director and cannot be the Chairman of the Board.
Employees only attend the Finance, Risk and Audit Committee meetings at the invitation
of the Committee. In the year ended 31 March 2019, the Chief Executive, the Chief Financial
Officer and General Counsel were invited to attend each meeting of the Finance, Risk and
Audit Committee.
The current members of the Finance, Risk and Audit Committee are Susan Paterson (Chair),
Michael Bushby, Tony Gibson and Candace Kinser and their qualifications are specified in
“The Board” section of this Annual Report. Prior to Ms. Paterson’s appointment as Chair of
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
112
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
113
the Finance, Risk and Audit Committee on 28 March 2019, the members of the Committee
between 23 August 2018 and 27 March 2019 were Michael Bushby (Chair), Graham Stuart,
Tony Gibson and Candace Kinser. Prior to 23 August 2018 the members of the Finance, Risk
and Audit Committee were Graham Stuart (Chair), Tony Gibson and Candace Kinser. All
members of the Finance, Risk and Audit Committee are independent non-executive directors.
Remuneration, Talent and Nomination Committee
EROAD has established a Remuneration, Talent and Nomination Committee which is
comprised of independent directors. This committee met three times in the year ended 31
March 2019 and has the time, the skills and the support necessary to discharge its duties and
obligations under the Remuneration, Talent and Nomination Committee Charter.
The Remuneration, Talent and Nomination Committee’s role is to oversee and regulate
remuneration and organisation matters of EROAD and recommend candidates to be
nominated as a director or candidate for a committee. Responsibilities encompass
remuneration and benefits policies; performance objectives and remuneration of EROAD’s
executives; succession planning and associated management development for the chief
executive and the executive team. The Remuneration, Talent and Nomination Committee
is also responsible for assisting the Board with establishing, publishing, implementing and
monitoring effective health and safety policies, processes and practices, under a separate
Safety and Wellbeing Charter.
When recommending candidates to act as director, the committee takes into account such
factors as it deems appropriate, including the diversity of background, experience and
qualifications of the candidate.
The current members of the Remuneration, Talent and Nomination Committee are Anthony
Gibson (Chairman), Candace Kinser, Susan Paterson, Michael Bushby and Graham Stuart.
Mr Bushby and Mr Stuart were appointed to the Committee on 16 November 2018 and Ms
Paterson was appointed on 28 March 2019. Gregg Dal Ponte was a member of the Committee
until his resignation on 30 April 2019.
All current members of the Remuneration, Talent and Nomination Committee are independent
directors. Steven Newman attended the three Remuneration, Talent and Nomination
Committee meetings at the invitation of the Committee.
Board
Finance, Risk and
Audit Committee
Remuneration,
Talent and
Nomination Committee
Eligible
to attend
Attended
Eligible
to attend
Attended
Eligible
to attend
Attended
Graham Stuart
Michael Bushby
Anthony Gibson
Candace Kinser
Steven Newman
Gregg Dal Ponte
Susan Paterson**
8
8
8
8
8
8
-
8
8
7
7
8
8
-
5
3*
5
5
-
-
-
5
3
3
4
5
-
-
1
1
3
3
-
3
-
1
1
3
3
3
2
-
* Michael Bushby was the Chair of the Finance, Risk and Audit Committee between 23 August 2018 and 27 March 2019.
** Susan Paterson joined the Board on 28 March 2019. She attended the March Board and the Finance Risk and Audit
Commitee meetings as an observer.
Board Processes
The Board held eight meetings during the year ended 31 March 2019. The table above shows
attendance at the Board and committee meetings.
If circumstances arise where a director needs to obtain independent advice, that director is, as
a matter of practice, at liberty to seek such advice at the expense of EROAD.
Other committees
EROAD complies with Recommendation 3.5 as the Board has considered whether it is appropriate
to establish any additional standing board committees and concluded that no further standing
committees are required at this stage. Noting the importance of health and safety to EROAD’s
business, the Remuneration, Talent and Nomination Committee is responsible for health and safety
and performs its functions in this regard under a Safety and Wellbeing Charter. In addition, each
month, members of the Board are provided with a Safety and Wellbeing report summarising
EROAD’s risk profile and management actions, the current safety and wellbeing focus, lead and lag
indicators and updates from the Safety and Wellbeing staff committee.
The Safety and Wellbeing Charter is available on EROAD’s website.
Takeover protocol
The Board has a formal written protocol that sets out the procedure to be followed in the
event that a takeover offer is received by EROAD.
PRINCIPLE 4 – REPORTING & DISCLOSURE
Making timely and balanced disclosure
EROAD is committed to promoting shareholder confidence through open, timely and accurate
market communication. EROAD has in place procedures designed to ensure compliance with
its disclosure obligations under the NZX Listing Rules. EROAD’s Market Disclosure Policy sets
out the responsibilities of the Board and management in disclosure and communication and
procedures for managing this obligation.
Copies of key governance documents, including the Code of Ethics, Securities Trading Policy,
Board and Committee Charters, Diversity and Inclusion Policy, Director and Senior Executive
Remuneration Policy and Market Disclosure Policy, are all available on EROAD’s website at
http://www.eroadglobal.com/global/investors/.
Non-financial reporting
Safety, communities and environment are at the heart of EROAD’s culture. Our philosophy and
achievements are outlined in the “About EROAD” section of the Annual Report.
EROAD conducts a comprehensive risk assessment by reviewing risk information from all
its business units on a periodic basis. The results are incorporated into future action plans
to mitigate the identified risks. This includes carefully considering and taking into account
environmental, economic, social sustainability and other risks that EROAD may face.
PRINCIPLE 5 – REMUNERATION
Directors’ Remuneration
The Remuneration, Talent and Nomination Committee is responsible for establishing and
monitoring remuneration policies and guidelines for directors which enable EROAD to
attract, motivate and retain the high calibre of directors who will contribute to the successful
governing of EROAD and create value for shareholders.
When determining the fees for directors and Chairs of the Board and its committees, the
Board considers the median director fee levels for comparable listed companies in New
Zealand. The directors’ fee pool limit was increased from $350,000 per annum to $500,000,
which was approved by shareholders at the 2018 Annual Shareholder Meeting. The directors’
fees are reviewed from time to time and, as previously reported, there was an increase to the
fees on 1 January 2018. Further, effective from 28 March 2019, the Board resolved to increase
the remuneration of the Chair of the Finance, Risk and Audit Committee.
Current non-executive directors’ remuneration is as follows:
• NZ$110,000 for the Chair of the Board,
• NZ$55,000 for non-executive directors,
• NZ$25,000 for the Chair of the Finance, Risk and Audit Committee, and
• NZ$8,000 for the Chair of the Remuneration, Nomination and Talent Committee.
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2019
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
114
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
115
Non-executive directors received the following directors’ fees from EROAD in the year ended
31 March 2019:
The Board
Graham Stuart
Michael Bushby
Candace Kinser
Susan Paterson*
Anthony Gibson
Gregg Dal Ponte
Total
Chair of the Board’s Committees
Graham Stuart
Michael Bushby
Susan Paterson*
Anthony Gibson
Total
NZ$
92,539
76,850
55,000
-
55,000
55,000
334,389
NZ$
3,925
5,952
-
8,000
17,877
*Susan Paterson joined the Board on 28 March 2019.
Directors do not take a portion of their remuneration under a share plan but directors may
hold shares in EROAD, details of which are set out in the “Directors’ Shareholdings” section of
this Annual Report. It is EROAD’s policy to encourage directors to acquire shares on-market.
Non-executive directors are entitled to be reimbursed for reasonable costs directly associated
with attending the Board meetings.
Steven Newman, in his capacity as an executive director, does not receive remuneration as a
director of EROAD.
No director of any EROAD subsidiary receives or retains any remuneration or other benefits in
their capacity as a director of that subsidiary.
Executive Remuneration
The Remuneration, Talent and Nomination Committee is responsible for reviewing the
remuneration of EROAD’s senior employees in consultation with EROAD’s Chief Executive Officer.
The Board is responsible for approving remuneration of the senior employees.
EROAD’s remuneration policy for members of the executive team, including the Chief Executive
Officer, provides the opportunity for them to receive, where performance merits, a total
remuneration package made up of three components:
Fixed Remuneration
Fixed remuneration consists of base salary and benefits. EROAD’s policy is to set fixed
remuneration in line with external market trends, the intrinsic value of a job and internal relativities.
Fixed remuneration is reviewed, but not necessarily increased, annually. Any remuneration
increases for the executive team must be approved by the Board. In conducting reviews, EROAD
takes into account individual performance of each executive.
Short-term Incentives
Short-term incentives (STIs) are at-risk payments designed to motivate and reward for
performance, typically in that financial year. The target value of an STI payment is set annually,
usually as a percentage of the executive’s base salary.
For the year ended 31 March 2019, a proportion (60%) of the STI is related to achievement of
company-wide financial targets, including EBITDA, the ratio of gross margin to sales and the ratio
of working capital to sales. The balance of the STI is related to individual performance under each
of the four objectives. The company-wide financial targets and at least three of the individual
objective and key results must be achieved before an STI is payable. Each objective has a specific
target and stretch level of performance, set at the beginning of each financial year. Target levels are
generally set at levels of performance that represent desired levels of performance for EROAD but
that are also achievable. Stretch levels are difficult to achieve and require considerable effort.
Performance level
Achievement %
Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF
format above