2016 Annual Report
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Business of the Company
Selected Consolidated Financial Information
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Financial Statements
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Common Stock Information
Directors and Executive Officers
Corporate Information
Annual Meeting
Page
1
3
5
27
28
34
60
61
62
62
BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY
We are a bank holding company headquartered in Jericho, New York and registered under the BHC Act. Through
our wholly owned bank subsidiary, Esquire Bank, National Association, we are a full service commercial bank dedicated to
serving the financial needs of the legal and small business communities on a national basis, as well as commercial and retail
customers in the New York metropolitan market. We offer tailored products and solutions to the legal community and their
clients as well as dynamic and flexible merchant services solutions to small business owners, both on a national basis. We
also offer traditional banking products for businesses and consumers in our local market area (a subset of the New York
metropolitan market). We believe these activities, primarily anchored by our legal community focus, generate a stable source
of low cost core deposits and a diverse asset base to support our overall operations. Our commercial and consumer loans
tailored to the litigation market enhance our overall yield on our loan portfolio, enabling us to earn attractive risk-adjusted net
interest margins. Additionally, our merchant processing activities generate a relatively stable source of fee income. We
believe our unique and dynamic business model distinguishes us from other banks and non-bank financial services companies
in the markets in which we operate as demonstrated by comparing our performance metrics for the years ended 2016 and
2015.
For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:
(cid:120)
(cid:120)
(cid:120)
(cid:120)
(cid:120)
Our net income increased 140.8% to $2.8 million or $0.55 per diluted share.
We had a net interest margin of 4.25%, an increase from 3.74%, stabilized by a low cost of funds of 0.15%
on our deposits.
Our loans increased 24.1%, or $54.1 million, to $278.6 million, with no non-performing loans and solid
asset quality metrics.
Our noninterest income increased 40.2% to $4.1 million, which represented 20.9% of our total revenue at
December 31, 2016, primarily driven by our merchant services platform.
As of December 31, 2016, our total assets, loans, deposits and stockholders’ equity totaled $424.8 million,
$278.6 million, $370.8 million and $52.2 million, respectively.
On June 30, 2017, we closed our initial public offering (“IPO”) and our stock now trades on the NASDAQ Capital
Markets under the symbol ESQ. The aggregate net proceeds to Esquire Financial from its initial public offering, including
the over-allotment shares that closed on July 20, 2017, after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering
expenses, are approximately $26.3 million. We intend to use the net proceeds of the offering to support the growth in Esquire
Bank’s loan portfolio, including the possibility of making larger loans due to our increased legal lending limit, to finance
potential strategic acquisitions to the extent such opportunities arise and for other general corporate purposes, which could
include other growth initiatives.
Additionally, both 2015 and 2016 were transformational years for the Company due in part to the successful
execution of our unique and dynamic business model. We believe our ongoing commitment to the litigation and small
business communities have been, and should continue to be, the foundation for our success. In August 2015, we closed our
private placement offering of our common stock and preferred stock that began in 2014, raising net proceeds of(cid:3031) $17.2
million and successfully converted Esquire Financial Holdings, Inc. and Esquire Bank from a savings and loan holding
company and savings bank to a bank holding company and national bank, respectively. We believe that the additional capital,
coupled with the conversion to a national bank, has and should continue to enhance our commercial loan growth in the legal
industry and business communities we serve.
We remain true to our commitment to serve the litigation community and our commercial customers through our
tailored and innovative products and solutions. We believe Esquire Bank’s approach to the legal community is simple yet
effective — we listen to the customer’s needs and tailor products and services around those needs. Our management team
includes attorneys and bankers who have serviced the legal community throughout their careers, which is a differentiating
factor and key to our robust attorney network. This model continues to set us apart from other institutions that offer a “one
product fits all” model. Our relationships within the litigation community are a key contributor to our loan growth, strong
loan yields, and low cost core deposits. The litigation community represented more than 70% of our deposit base at
March 31, 2017. In addition to our lending activities, we have also remained steadfast in growing our merchant services
1
platform. We provide dynamic and flexible merchant services solutions to small business owners. Our merchant services
platform has grown to approximately 13,000 small businesses at December 31, 2016, which generated most of our
noninterest income and represented 20.9% of our revenue for the year ended December 31, 2016. We believe merchant
services represents a significant opportunity for future growth in fee income, core deposits and enhanced lending
opportunities.
Our low cost core deposits (deposits, excluding time deposits), representing our primary funding source for loan growth,
totaled $346.8 million at December 31, 2017 resulting in a total cost of deposits of 0.16%. These stable low cost funds are
driven by our attorney operating and escrow deposits, representing more than 70% of our total deposit base at December 31,
2017. We intend to continue to prudently manage growth in deposits, utilizing customer sweep programs for our mass tort
and class action business banking programs. We do not have traditional “brick and mortar” branches to support our deposit
growth. Instead, we rely on our robust attorney network to gather deposits and our customers utilize on-line cash
management technology to manage their operating and escrow accounts as well as their business banking needs across the
country. We believe the lack of branch infrastructure coupled with our strong net interest margin and growth will continue to
drive our efficiency ratio below the 74% reported for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Esquire Bank was originally chartered in 2006. Esquire Financial Holdings, Inc. became our holding company in
2010. Our principal executive offices are located at 100 Jericho Quadrangle, Suite 100, Jericho, New York 11753, and our
telephone number at that address is (800) 996-0213.
2
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The following tables set forth certain information concerning the consolidated financial position, consolidated data from
operations and performance ratios of the Company at the dates and for the years indicated.
2016
At December 31,
2015
(Dollars in thousands, except share and
per share data)
2014
Balance Sheet Data:
Total assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Securities available-for-sale
Loans receivable, net
Restricted stock
Deposits
Secured borrowings
Total stockholders’ equity
Income Statement Data:
Interest income
Interest expense
Net interest income
Provision for loan losses
Net interest income after provision for
loan losses
Noninterest income
Noninterest expense
$ 424,833 $ 352,650 $ 330,690
42,993 33,154 71,891
92,645 84,239 70,925
275,165 221,720 170,512
237
370,788 301,687 290,774
391
52,186 49,425 38,542
1,430
1,649
381
371
511
$ 16,168 $ 12,451 $ 10,714
466
15,657 11,994 10,248
300
930
457
595
15,062 11,064
2,943
9,948
1,765
14,599 12,171 11,262
4,125
Income before income tax expense
Income tax expense
Net income
Less: Preferred stock dividends
Net income available to common
stockholders
4,588
1,766
2,822
1,836
664
1,172
—
—
$
2,822 $
1,172 $
451
410
41
—
41
Per Share Data:
Earnings per common share:
Basic
Diluted
Book value per common share(1)
Tangible book value per common share(2)
$
$
$
$
0.56 $
0.55 $
10.29 $
10.29 $
0.25 $
0.25 $
9.72 $
9.72 $
0.01
0.01
8.98
8.98
3
Selected Performance Ratios:
Return on average assets
Net interest margin
Efficiency ratio
Efficiency ratio, adjusted(3)
Allowance for loan losses to total loans
Nonperforming loans to total loans(4)
0.74%
4.25%
73.80%
73.82%
1.23%
0.00%
0.36%
3.74%
81.48%
81.48%
1.25%
0.00%
0.01%
3.86%
93.75%
94.94%
1.25%
0.00%
`
_______________________
(1) For purposes of computing book value per common share, book value equals total common stockholders’ equity.
(2) The Company had no intangible assets as of the dates indicated. Thus, tangible book value per common share is the
same as book value per common share for each of the periods indicated.
(3) Efficiency ratio represents noninterest expenses, divided by the sum of net interest income plus noninterest income.
With respect to efficiency ratio, adjusted, noninterest income excludes gains or losses on sale of investment
securities. This is a non-GAAP financial measure. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measure Reconciliation” below for a
reconciliation of this measure to its most comparable GAAP measure.
(4) Nonperforming loans include nonaccrual loans, loans past due 90 days and still accruing interest and loans modified
under troubled debt restructurings.
Non-GAAP Financial Measure Reconciliation
The efficiency ratio is a non-GAAP measure of expense control relative to recurring revenue. We calculate the
efficiency ratio by dividing total noninterest expenses as determined under GAAP, and total noninterest income as
determined under GAAP, but excluding net gains on securities from this calculation and other non-recurring income
sources, if applicable, which we refer to below as recurring revenue. We believe that this provides one reasonable
measure of core expenses relative to core revenue.
We believe that this non-GAAP financial measure provides information that is important to investors and that is
useful in understanding our financial position, results and ratios. However, this non-GAAP financial measure is
supplemental and is not a substitute for an analysis based on GAAP measures. As other companies may use different
calculations for this measure, this presentation may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures by other
companies.
Efficiency Ratio:
Net interest income
Noninterest income
Less: Net gains on sales of
securities
Adjusted revenue
At December 31,
2015
2016
2014
$ 15,657 $ 11,994 $ 10,247
4,125 2,943 1,766
6
151
$ 19,776 $ 14,937 $ 11,862
—
Total noninterest expense
14,599 12, 171 11,262
Efficiency ratio
73.82% 81.48% 94.94%
4
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
Our profitability is highly dependent on our net interest income, which is the difference between our interest
income on interest earning assets, such as loans and securities, and our interest expense on interest bearing liabilities,
such as deposits and borrowed funds. Additionally, we also obtain a significant portion of noninterest income through
our merchant services business.
Our net income increased $1.7 million, or 140.8%, to $2.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from
$1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase was due to an increase in net interest income and
merchant processing income. The increase in net interest income was caused by an increase in interest and fees on loans,
which increased $3.5 million, or 32.8%, to $14.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $10.6 million for
the year ended December 31, 2015. This increase was due to our continued success in growing 1-4 family residential,
multifamily, commercial real estate loans, construction, commercial loans and consumer loans.
Noninterest income increased $1.2 million, or 40.2%, to $4.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016
from $2.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase in noninterest income was primarily from growth
in our merchant services business. Merchant processing income increased by $737,000 or 33.5% to $2.9 million for the
year ended December 31, 2016 from $2.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. Customer related fees and
service charges also increased $439,000 or 59.2% to $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $741,000
for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Our provision for loan losses was $595,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to $930,000 for
the year ended December 31, 2015. The provision recorded resulted in an allowance for loan losses of $3.4 million, or
1.23% of total loans at December 31, 2016, compared to $2.8 million, or 1.25% of total loans at December 31, 2015. The
decreases in the allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans resulted primarily from changes in our loan portfolio
composition.
Our net income increased $1.1 million to $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 from $41,000 for
the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase was due to an increase in net interest income and merchant processing
income, partially offset by a decrease in gain on sales of securities and an increase in the provision for loan losses. The
increase in net interest income was caused by an increase in interest and fees on loans, which increased $1.7 million, or
19.2%, to $10.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 from $8.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2014.
This increase was due to our continued success in growing 1-4 family residential, multifamily, commercial real estate
loans, construction, commercial loans and consumer loans.
Noninterest income increased $1.2 million, or 66.7%, to $2.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2015
from $1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase in noninterest income was primarily from growth
in our merchant services business. Merchant processing income increased by $1.1 million or 92.7% to $2.2 million for
the year ended December 31, 2015 from $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase in merchant
processing income was primarily due to growth in the business, as average monthly volumes increased to $305.4 million
for 2016 compared to $263.6 million for 2015. Gains on sales of securities decreased $151,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2015 from the year ended December 31, 2014. We did not sell any securities during the year ended
December 31, 2015.
Our provision for loan losses was $930,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to $300,000 for
the year ended December 31, 2014. The higher provision for loan loss was a result of the growth in the loan portfolio and
related impact to the allowance for loan losses.
Critical Accounting Policies
A summary of our accounting policies is described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included
in this prospectus. Critical accounting estimates are necessary in the application of certain accounting policies and
5
procedures and are particularly susceptible to significant change. Critical accounting policies are defined as those
involving significant judgments and assumptions by management that could have a material impact on the carrying value
of certain assets or on income under different assumptions or conditions. Management believes that the most critical
accounting policies, which involve the most complex or subjective decisions or assessments, are as follows:
Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable incurred credit
losses. The allowance for loan losses is increased by provisions for loan losses charged to income. Losses are charged to
the allowance when all or a portion of a loan is deemed to be uncollectible. Subsequent recoveries of loans previously
charged off are credited to the allowance for loan losses when realized. Management estimates the allowance balance
required using past loan loss experience, the nature and volume of the portfolio, information about specific borrower
situations and estimated collateral values, economic conditions and other factors. Allocations of the allowance may be
made for specific loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in management’s judgment, should be
charged off.
The allowance consists of specific and general components. The specific component relates to loans that are
individually classified as impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to
collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Loans for which the terms have been
modified resulting in a concession, and for which the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties, are considered
troubled debt restructurings and classified as impaired.
Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the
probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant
payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance
of payment delays and payment shortfalls on case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances
surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reason for the delay, the borrower’s prior
payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.
All loans, except for consumer loans, are individually evaluated for impairment. If a loan is impaired, a portion
of the allowance is allocated as a specific allowance. The measurement of an impaired loan is based on (i) the present
value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, (ii) the loan’s observable market price
or (iii) the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.
Troubled debt restructurings are separately identified for impairment disclosures and are measured at the
present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s effective rate at inception. If a trouble debt restructuring is
considered to be a collateral dependent loan, the loan is reported, net, at the fair value of the collateral. For troubled debt
restructurings that subsequently default, we determine the amount of reserve in accordance with the accounting policy
for the allowance for loan losses.
The general component is based on historical loss experience adjusted for current factors. The historical loss
experience is determined by portfolio segment and is based on the actual loss history experienced by the company. This
actual loss experience is supplemented with other economic factors based on the risks present for each portfolio segment.
These economic factors include consideration of the following: levels of and trends in delinquencies and impaired loans;
levels of and trends in charge-offs and recoveries; trends in volume and terms of loans; effects of any changes in risk
selection and underwriting standards; other changes in lending policies, procedures, and practices; experience, ability,
and depth of lending management and other relevant staff; national and local economic trends and conditions; industry
conditions; and effects of changes in credit concentrations.
We have identified the following loan segments: Commercial Real Estate, Multifamily, Construction,
Commercial, 1-4 Family Residential and Consumer. The risks associated with a concentration in real estate loans include
potential losses from fluctuating values of land and improved properties. Commercial Real Estate and Multifamily loans
are expected to be repaid from the cash flow of the underlying property so the collective amount of rents must be
sufficient to cover all operating expenses, property management and maintenance, taxes and debt service. Increases in
vacancy rates, interest rates or other changes in general economic conditions can all have an impact on the borrower and
their ability to repay the loan. Construction loans are considered riskier than commercial financing on improved and
established commercial real estate. The risk of potential loss increases if the original cost estimates or time to complete
are significantly off. The remainder of the loan portfolio is comprised of commercial and consumer loans. The primary
6
risks associated with the commercial loans are the cash flow of the business, the experience and quality of the borrowers’
management, the business climate, and the impact of economic factors. The primary risks associated with residential real
estate and consumer loans relate to the borrower, such as the risk of a borrower’s unemployment as a result of
deteriorating economic conditions or the amount and nature of a borrower’s other existing indebtedness, and the value of
the collateral securing the loan if the bank must take possession of the collateral.
Although management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, because of uncertainties
associated with local economic conditions, collateral values and future cash flows on impaired loans, it is reasonably
possible that a material change could occur in the allowance for loan losses in the near term. However, the amount of the
change that is reasonably possible cannot be estimated. The evaluation of the adequacy of loan collateral is often based
upon estimates and appraisals. Because of changing economic conditions, the valuations determined from such estimates
and appraisals may also change. Accordingly, we may ultimately incur losses that vary from management’s current
estimates. Adjustments to the allowance for loan losses will be reported in the period such adjustments become known or
can be reasonably estimated. All loan losses are charged to the allowance for loan losses when the loss actually occurs or
when the collectability of the principal is unlikely. Recoveries are credited to the allowance at the time of recovery.
Income Taxes. Income taxes are provided for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using enacted rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are
expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the
period the change occurs. Deferred tax assets are reduced, through a valuation allowance, if necessary, by the amount of
such benefits that are not expected to be realized based on current available evidence.
A tax position is recognized as a benefit only if it is “more likely than not” that the tax position would be
sustained in a tax examination, with a tax examination being presumed to occur. The amount recognized is the largest
amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized on examination. For tax positions not meeting the
“more likely than not” test, no tax benefit is recorded. The Company recognizes interest and/or penalties related to
income tax matters in income tax expense.
Emerging Growth Company. Pursuant to the JOBS Act, an emerging growth company is provided the option to
adopt new or revised accounting standards that may be issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) or
the SEC either (i) within the same periods as those otherwise applicable to non-emerging growth companies or (ii) within
the same time periods as private companies. We have irrevocably elected to adopt new accounting standards within the
public company adoption period.
Although we are still evaluating the JOBS Act, we may take advantage of some of the reduced regulatory and
reporting requirements that are available to it so long as we qualify as an emerging growth company, including, but not
limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation, and exemptions from the requirements of
holding non-binding advisory votes on executive compensation and golden parachute payments.
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
Assets. Our total assets were $424.8 million at December 31, 2016, an increase of $72.2 million from $352.7
million at December 31, 2015. The increase was primarily due to an increase in net loans of $53.4 million, or 24.1%, and
an increase in cash and cash equivalents of $9.8 million.
Our total assets increased $22.0 million, or 6.6%, to $352.7 million at December 31, 2015 from $330.7 million
at December 31, 2014. The increase resulted primarily from an increase in net loans and securities, partially offset by
decreases in cash and cash equivalents.
Cash and Cash Equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents increased $9.8 million, or 29.7%, to $43.0 million at
December 31, 2016 from $33.1 million at December 31, 2015.
7
Cash and cash equivalents decreased $38.8 million, or 53.9%, to $33.1 million at December 31, 2015 from
$71.9 million at December 31, 2014. The decrease in cash and cash equivalents resulted from our using excess liquidity
at December 31, 2014 to fund loan growth and investments in securities.
Loan Portfolio Analysis. At December 31, 2016, net loans were $275.2 million, or 64.8% of total assets,
compared to $221.7 million, or 62.9% of total assets, at December 31, 2015. Commercial loans increased $22.5 million,
or 26.9%, to $106.1 million at December 31, 2016 from $83.6 million at December 31, 2015. Multifamily loans
increased $12.2 million, or 17.2%, to $83.4 million at December 31, 2016 from $71.2 million at December 31, 2015.
Consumer loans decreased $3.0 million or 22.0%, to $10.6 million at December 31, 2016 from $13.6 million at
December 31, 2015. 1-4 family residential loans increased $21.1 million, or 73.8%, to $49.6 million at December 31,
2016 from $28.5 million at December 31, 2015. Construction loans also increased by $313,000, or 5.9%, to $5.6 million
at December 31, 2016 from $5.3 million at December 31, 2015. Commercial real estate loans increased by $926,000, or
4.4%, to $22.2 million at December 31, 2016 from $21.3 million at December 31, 2015.
At December 31, 2015, net loans were $221.7 million, or 62.9% of total assets, compared to $170.5 million, or
51.6% of total assets at December 31, 2014. Commercial loans increased $17.9 million, or 27.3%, to $83.6 million at
December 31, 2015 from $65.6 million at December 31, 2014. Multifamily loans increased $12.6 million or 21.5% to
$71.2 million at December 31, 2015 from $58.6 million at December 31, 2014. Commercial real estate loans increased
$7.5 million, or 54.4%, to $21.3 million at December 31, 2015 from $13.8 million at December 31, 2014. 1-4 family
residential loans increased $5.5 million or 23.7% to $28.5 million at December 31, 2015 from $23.1 million at December
31, 2014. Construction loans also increased by $4.2 million to $5.3 million at December 31, 2015 from $1.1 million at
December 31, 2014. Consumer loans increased by $4.0 million or 41.9% to $13.6 million at December 31, 2015 from
$9.6 million at December 31, 2014.
Loan Portfolio Composition. The following table sets forth the composition of our loan portfolio by type of
loan at the dates indicated.
2016
Amount Percent
At December 31,
2015
Amount Percent
(Dollars in thousands)
2014
Amount Percent
Real estate:
1-4 family residential
Multifamily
Commercial real estate
Construction
Total real estate
Commercial
Consumer
Total Loans
Allowance for loan losses
Deferred loan costs, net
Loans, net
13.44%
$ 49,597
34.11
83,410
8.02
22,198
0.65
5,610
56.22
160,815
38.22
106,064
10,571
5.56
$ 277,450 100.00% $ 223,403 100.00% $ 171,730 100.00%
17.88% $ 28,531
30.06 71,184
8.00 21,272
5,297
2.02
57.96 126,284
38.23 83,563
3.81 13,556
12.77% $ 23,072
31.86 58,578
9.52 13,776
1,105
2.38
56.53 96,531
37.40 65,643
9,556
6.07
(3,413)
1,128
$ 275,165
(2,799)
1,116
$ 221,720
(2,165)
947
$ 170,512
8
Real estate:
1-4 family residential
Multifamily
Commercial real estate
Construction
Total real estate
Commercial
Consumer
Total Loans
Allowance for loan losses
Deferred loan costs, net
Loans, net
At December 31,
2013
2012
Amount
Percent
Amount
Percent
(Dollars in thousands)
$
$
$
13,757
54,702
8,016
6,693
83,168
60,833
5,208
149,209
(1,865)
(27)
147,317
9.22% $
36.66
5.37
4.49
55.74
40.77
3.49
100.00% $
$
10,879
46,082
8,304
4,886
70,151
53,928
4,679
128,758
(1,855)
(501)
126,402
8.45%
35.79
6.45
3.80
54.49
41.88
3.63
100.00%
Loan Maturity. The following table sets forth certain information at December 31, 2016 regarding the
contractual maturity of our loan portfolio. Demand loans, loans having no stated repayment schedule or maturity, and
overdraft loans are reported as being due in one year or less. The table does not include any estimate of prepayments that
could significantly shorten the average life of all loans and may cause our actual repayment experience to differ from
that shown below.
December 31, 2016
Amounts due in:
1-4 Family
Residential Multifamily
Commercial
Real Estate Construction Commercial Consumer Total
(In thousands)
One year or less
More than one to five years
More than five to ten years
More than ten years
Total
$ 8,725 $ 21,578 $
(cid:650) $
30,478 38,782 13,920
5,338
2,940
$ 49,597 $ 83,410 $ 22,198 $
7,456 13,701
9,349
2,938
1,580 $ 92,288 $ 8,921 $ 133,092
1,302 102,288
4,030 13,776
348 26,843
(cid:650)
(cid:650) 15,227
(cid:650)
5,610 $ 106,064 $ 10,571 $ 277,450
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
The following table sets forth fixed and adjustable-rate loans at December 31, 2016 that are contractually due
after December 31, 2017.
Real estate
1-4 family residential
Multifamily
Commercial real estate
Construction
Commercial
Consumer
Total
Due After December 31, 2017
Fixed
Adjustable
Total
(In thousands)
$
$
40,586 $
53,702
18,437
4,030
988
1,649
119,392 $
286 $
8,130
3,762
(cid:650)
12,788
(cid:650)
24,966 $
40,872
61,832
22,199
4,030
13,776
1,649
144,358
At December 31, 2016, $30.7 million, or 22.5% of our adjustable interest rate loans were at their interest rate
floor.
9
Delinquent Loans. The following tables set forth our loan delinquencies, including non-accrual loans, by type
and amount at the dates indicated.
30-59
Days
Past
Due
30-59
Days
Past
Due
30-59
Days
Past
Due
90 Days
or More
Past Due
90 Days
or More
Past Due
At December 31, 2016
60-89
Days
Past
Due
At December 31, 2014
60-89
Days
Past
Due
At December 31, 2015
60-89
Days
Past
Due
(Dollars in thousands)
$ 203 $ (cid:650) $ (cid:650) $ (cid:650) $ (cid:650) $ (cid:650) $ (cid:650) $ (cid:650) $ (cid:650)
(cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650)
(cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650)
(cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650)
(cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650) 2,100 (cid:650)
(cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650)
$ 203 $ (cid:650) $ (cid:650) $ (cid:650) $ (cid:650) $ (cid:650) $ (cid:650) $ 2,100 $ (cid:650)
90 Days
or More
Past Due
At December 31, 2012
At December 31, 2013
60-89
Days
Past
Due
30-59
Days
Past
Due
90 Days
or More
Past Due
60-89
Days
Past Due
30-59
90 Days
Days
or More
Past Due
Past Due
(Dollars in thousands)
$ (cid:650) $ (cid:650) $ (cid:650) $ (cid:650) $ (cid:650) $ (cid:650)
264
(cid:650) 843 (cid:650)
(cid:650) 685 (cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650)
(cid:650) (cid:650)
634 (cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650)
(cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650)
(cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650) (cid:650)
$ (cid:650) $ 1,528 $ 634 $ 336 $ (cid:650) $ 264
336 (cid:650)
1-4 family residential
Multifamily
Commercial real estate
Construction
Commercial
Consumer
Total
1-4 family residential
Multifamily
Commercial real estate
Construction
Commercial
Consumer
Total
Non-performing Assets.
Non-performing assets include loans that are 90 or more days past due or on non-accrual status, including
troubled debt restructurings on non-accrual status, and real estate and other loan collateral acquired through foreclosure
and repossession. Troubled debt restructurings include loans for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower’s
financial difficulties, for which we grant a concession to the borrower that we would not consider otherwise. Loans 90
days or greater past due may remain on an accrual basis if adequately collateralized and in the process of collection. At
December 31, 2016, we did not have any accruing loans past due 90 days or greater or troubled debt restructurings. For
non-accrual loans, interest previously accrued but not collected is reversed and charged against income at the time a loan
is placed on non-accrual status. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts
contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.
Real estate that we acquire as a result of foreclosure or by deed-in-lieu of foreclosure is classified as foreclosed
real estate until it is sold. When property is acquired, it is initially recorded at the fair value less costs to sell at the date of
foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. Holding costs and declines in fair value after acquisition of the property result
in charges against income. We have not had any foreclosed assets for the periods presented.
10
The following table sets forth information regarding our non-performing assets at the dates indicated.
Non-accrual loans:
1- 4 family residential
Multifamily
Commercial real estate
Construction
Commercial
Consumer
Total non-accrual loans
Other real estate owned
Loans past due 90 days and still accruing
Troubled debt restructurings
Total nonperforming assets
Total loans (1)
Total assets
2016
2015
At December 31,
2014
(Dollars in thousands)
2013
2012
$
$
$
(cid:650) $
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650) $
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650) $
(cid:650) $
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650) $
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650) $
(cid:650) $
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650) $
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650) $
(cid:650) $
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
634
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
634 $
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
634 $
(cid:650)
264
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
264
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
264
$278,578 $ 224,519 $172,677 $149,182 $128,257
$424,833 $ 352,650 $330,690 $237,580 $222,181
Total non-accrual loans to total loans
Total non-performing assets to total assets
________________________
(1) Loans are presented before the allowance for loan losses but include deferred fees/costs.
(cid:650)%
(cid:650)%
(cid:650)%
(cid:650)%
(cid:650)%
(cid:650)%
0.42%
0.27%
0.21%
0.12%
Allowance for Loan Losses.
Please see “–Critical Accounting Policies – Allowance for Loan Losses” for additional discussion of our
allowance policy.
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at levels considered adequate by management to provide for
probable loan losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the consolidated balance sheet reporting dates. The allowance for
loan losses is based on management’s assessment of various factors affecting the loan portfolio, including portfolio
composition, delinquent and non-accrual loans, national and local business conditions and loss experience and an overall
evaluation of the quality of the underlying collateral.
11
The following table sets forth activity in our allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated.
2016
For the years ended December 31,
2013
2014
2015
(Dollars in thousands)
2012
Allowance at beginning of year
Provision for loan losses
Charge-offs:
$ 2,799
595
$ 2,165 $ 1,865 $ 1,855 $
930
300
670
60 1,255
1-4 family residential
Multifamily
Commercial real estate
Construction
Commercial
Consumer
Total charge-offs
Recoveries:
1-4 family residential
Multifamily
Commercial real estate
Construction
Commercial
Consumer
Total recoveries
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
7
7
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
26
(cid:650)
26
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
296
(cid:650)
296
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
39
(cid:650)
12
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
51
(cid:650)
1
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
1
(cid:650)
70
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
70
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
(cid:650)
Allowance at end of year
$ 3,413
$ 2,799 $ 2,165 $ 1,865 $ 1,855
Nonperforming loans at end of period
Total loans outstanding at end of period(1)
Average loans outstanding during the period(1)
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans
Allowance for loan losses to total loans at end of the
period(1)
Net charge-offs to average loans
outstanding during the period
________________________
(1) Loans are presented before the allowance for loan losses but include deferred fees/costs.
$
(cid:650)
$278,578
$248,068
N/A
(0.01)%
1.23%
1.25%
0.16%
(cid:650) $
$
264
(cid:650) $
$ 224,519 $172,677 $149,182 $128,257
$ 187,317 $147,330 $134,748 $109,875
N/A 294.16% 702.65%
N/A
634 $
1.25%
0.00%
1.25%
1.45%
0.04%
0.06%
12
Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses. The following tables set forth the allowance for loan losses allocated
by loan category. The allowance for loan losses allocated to each category is not necessarily indicative of future losses in
any particular category and does not restrict the use of the allowance to absorb losses in other categories.
2016
Percent of
Loans in
Each
Category to
Total
Loans
Allowance
for Loan
Losses
At December 31,
2015
Percent of
Loans in
Each
Allowance
Category
for Loan
to Total
Losses
Loans
(Dollars in thousands)
2014
Percent of
Loans in
Each
Category
to Total
Loans
Allowance
for Loan
Losses
$
1-4 family residential
Multifamily
Commercial real estate
Construction
Commercial
Consumer
Total allocated allowance
$
360
621
238
141
1,934
119
3,413
17.88 % $
30.06
8.00
2.02
38.23
3.81
100.00 % $
213
533
230
134
1,536
153
2,799
12.77% $
31.86
9.52
2.38
37.40
6.07
100.00% $
162
528
97
27
1,222
129
2,165
13.44%
34.11
8.02
0.65
38.22
5.56
100.00%
1-4 family residential
Multifamily
Commercial real estate
Construction
Commercial
Consumer
Total allocated allowance
At December 31,
2013
2012
Percent of
Loans in
Each
Allowance
Category to
for Loan
Total
Loans
Losses
(Dollars in thousands)
Percent of
Loans in
Each
Category
to Total
Loans
Allowance
for Loan
Losses
$
$
60
536
115
98
960
96
1,865
9.22% $
36.66
5.37
4.49
40.77
3.49
100.00% $
61
549
119
115
946
65
1,855
8.45%
35.79
6.45
3.80
41.88
3.63
100.00%
The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans was 1.23%, 1.25%, and 1.25% as of December 31, 2016,
2015 and 2014, respectively. The decrease in the allowance percentage from 2016 to 2015 was primarily due to changes
in the composition of the loan portfolio.
The allowance consists of general and allocated components. The general component relates to pools of non-
impaired loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for qualitative factors. The allocated component relates
to loans that are classified as impaired, whereby an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows, collateral
value or observable market price of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan.
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be
unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan
agreement. Factors considered by us in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the
probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant
payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. We determine the significance of
payment delays and payment shortfalls on case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances
surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior
payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. The measurement of an
impaired loan is based on (i) the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest
rate, (ii) the loan’s observable market price or (iii) the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.
13
We had no impaired loans at December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
All loans except for consumer loans are individually evaluated for impairment.
Troubled debt restructurings are separately identified for impairment disclosures and are measured at the
present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s effective rate at inception. If a troubled debt restructuring is
considered to be a collateral dependent loan, the loan is reported, net, at the fair value of the collateral. For troubled debt
restructurings that subsequently default, we determine the amount of reserve in accordance with the accounting policy
for the allowance for loan losses.
Interest income on mortgage and commercial loans is discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days delinquent
unless the loan is well-secured and in process of collection. Consumer loans are typically charged off no later than 120
days past due. Past due status is based on the contractual terms of the loan. In all cases, loans are placed on nonaccrual or
charged-off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful. Nonaccrual loans and loans past
due 90 days still on accrual include both smaller balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for
impairment and individually classified impaired loans. A loan is moved to non-accrual status in accordance with our loan
policy, typically after 90 days of non-payment.
All interest accrued but not received for loans placed on nonaccrual is reversed against interest income. Interest
received on such loans is accounted for on the cash-basis or cost-recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual.
Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and
future payments are reasonably assured.
Although we believe that we use the best information available to establish the allowance for loan losses, future
adjustments to the allowance for loan losses may be necessary and our results of operations could be adversely affected
if circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the determinations. Furthermore, while we
believe we have established our allowance for loan losses in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in
the United States of America, there can be no assurance that regulators, in reviewing our loan portfolio, will not require
us to increase our allowance for loan losses. In addition, because future events affecting borrowers and collateral cannot
be predicted with certainty, there can be no assurance that the existing allowance for loan losses is adequate or that
increases will not be necessary should the quality of any loans deteriorate as a result of the factors discussed above. Any
material increase in the allowance for loan losses may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Securities Portfolio
The following table sets forth the amortized cost and estimated fair value of our available-for-sale securities
portfolio at the dates indicated. Our securities portfolio has decreased in recent years as we have used excess cash to fund
our loan growth instead of re-investing the proceeds in investment securities.
Government agency debentures
Mortgage backed securities-agency
Collateralized mortgage obligations-
agency
Total
2016
At December 31,
2015
2014
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
$
— $
16,417
— $
16,012
(In thousands)
4,064 $
17,445
4,001 $
17,147
4,074 $
17,884
3,980
17,709
77,677
49,380
$ 94,094 $ 92,645 $ 84,956 $ 84,239 $ 71,338 $
76,633
63,447
63,091
49,236
70,925
At December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we had no investments in a single company or entity, other than
government and government agency securities, which had an aggregate book value in excess of 10% of our equity.
We review the investment portfolio on a quarterly basis to determine the cause, magnitude and duration of
declines in the fair value of each security. In estimating other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI), we consider many
factors including: (1) the length of time and extent that fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and
14
near term prospects of the issuer, (3) whether the market decline was affected by macroeconomic conditions, and
(4) whether we have the intent to sell the security or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before its
anticipated recovery. If either of the criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met, the entire difference between
amortized cost and fair value is recognized as impairment through earnings. For debt securities that do not meet the
aforementioned criteria, the amount of impairment is split into two components as follows: (1) OTTI related to credit
loss, which must be recognized in the income statement and (2) OTTI related to other factors, which is recognized in
other comprehensive income. The credit loss is defined as the difference between the present value of the cash flows
expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis. The assessment of whether any other than temporary decline exists
may involve a high degree of subjectivity and judgment and is based on the information available to management at a
point in time. We evaluate securities for OTTI at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or
market conditions warrant such an evaluation.
At December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, securities in unrealized loss positions were issuances from
government sponsored entities. Due to the decline in fair value attributable to changes in interest rates and illiquidity, not
credit quality and because we do not have the intent to sell the securities and it is likely that it will not be required to sell
the securities before their anticipated recovery, we do not consider the securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired at
December 31, 2016 and 2015.
No impairment charges were recorded for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014.
Portfolio Maturities and Yields. The composition and maturities of the investment securities portfolio at
December 31, 2016, are summarized in the following table. No tax-equivalent yield adjustments have been made, as the
amount of tax free interest earning assets is immaterial.
One Year or Less
Through Ten Years More Than Ten Years
Total
More Than One Year
through Five Years
At December 31, 2016
More Than Five Years
Book
Value
Weighted
Average
Yield
Book
Value
Weighted
Average
Yield
Book
Value
Weighted
Average
Yield
Book
Value
Weighted
Average
Yield
Weighted
Average
Yield
Book
Value
(Dollars in thousands)
$ —
—% $
—
—% $
—
—% $
—
—% $ —
—%
—
—
—
—
—
— 16,417
1.12 16,417
1.12
—
—
—
—
5,026
2.20 72,651
2.02 77,677
2.03
$ —
—% $
—
—% $
5,026
2.20% $ 89,068
1.85% $ 94,094
1.87%
Government agency
debentures
Mortgage backed
securities-agency
Collateralized mortgage
obligations-agency
Total securities available
for sale
Deposits
Total deposits increased $69.1 million, or 22.9%, to $370.8 million at December 31, 2016 from $301.7 million
at December 31, 2015. We continue to focus on the acquisition and expansion of core deposit relationships, which we
define as all deposits except for certificates of deposit. Core deposits totaled $346.8 million at December 31, 2016, or
93.5% of total deposits at that date.
The following tables set forth the distribution of average deposits by account type at the dates indicated.
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
Demand
Savings, NOW and Money Market
Time
Total deposits
$
$
15
Average
Balance
Percent
(Dollars in thousands)
32.29%
62.47%
5.24%
100.00%
105,035
203,185
17,041
325,261
Average
Rate
0.00 %
0.20 %
0.42 %
0.15 %
For the Years Ended December 31,
2015
2014
Average
Balance Percent
Average
Rate
Average
Balance Percent
Average
Rate
(Dollars in thousands)
Demand
Savings, NOW and Money Market
Time
$ 95,820
176,892
10,494
33.83%
62.46%
3.71%
0.00 % $ 72,202
0.20 % 158,596
0.74 % 13,107
29.60 %
65.02 %
5.38 %
0.00%
0.22%
0.70%
Total deposits
$ 283,206 100.00%
0.15 % $ 243,905 100.00 %
0.18%
As of December 31, 2016, the aggregate amount of all our certificates of deposit in amounts greater than or
equal to $100,000 was approximately $20.2 million. The following table sets forth the maturity of these certificates as of
December 31, 2016.
Maturing period:
Three months or less
Over three months through six months
Over six months through twelve months
Over twelve months
Total certificates
Borrowings
At
December 31, 2016
(In thousands)
$
16,678
1,129
1,619
751
$
20,177
At December 31, 2016, we had the ability to borrow a total of $72.8 million from the Federal Home Loan Bank
of New York. We also had an available line of credit with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York discount window of
$15.6 million. At December 31, 2016, we also had a $3.5 million and $4.0 million line of credit with Atlantic
Community Bankers’ Bank and Zions Bank, respectively. No amounts were outstanding on any of the aforementioned
lines as of December 31, 2016.
At December 31, 2015, we had the ability to borrow a total of $69.4 million from the Federal Home Loan Bank
of New York. At December 31, 2015, we also had an available line of credit with the Federal Reserve Bank of New
York discount window of $10.8 million. At December 31, 2015, we also had a $3.5 million and $4.0 million line of
credit with Atlantic Community Bankers’ Bank and Zions Bank, respectively. No amounts were outstanding on any of
the aforementioned lines as of December 31, 2015.
Stockholders’ Equity
Total stockholders’ equity increased $2.8 million, or 5.6%, to $52.2 million at December 31, 2016, from $49.4
million at December 31, 2015. The increase for the year ended December 31, 2016 was primarily due to $2.8 million in
net income.
Total stockholders’ equity increased $10.9 million, or 28.2%, to $49.4 million at December 31, 2015, from
$38.5 million at December 31, 2014. The increase for the year ended December 31, 2015 was due primarily to a $9.8
million capital raise through issuance of stock and $1.2 million in net income, partially offset by a $184,000 increase in
accumulated other comprehensive loss due to changes in the fair value of securities available for sale.
16
Average Balance Sheets and Related Yields and Rates
The following tables present average balance sheet information, interest income, interest expense and the
corresponding average yields earned and rates paid for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014. The average
balances are daily averages and, for loans, include both performing and nonperforming balances. Interest income on
loans includes the effects of discount accretion and net deferred loan origination costs accounted for as yield
adjustments.
2016
Years Ended December 31,
2015
2014
Average
Balance
Interest
Average
Yield/Rate
Average
Balance
Interest
Average
Yield/Rate
Average
Balance
Interest
Average
Yield/Rate
(Dollars in thousands)
INTEREST EARNING ASSETS
Loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 248,068 $ 14,071
Securities, includes restricted stock . . .
87,830
1,875
Interest earning cash . . . . . . . . . . . .
32,849
222
Total interest earning assets . . . . . . . .
368,747
16,168
5.67 %
2.13 %
0.68 %
4.38 %
$ 187,317 $ 10,594
78,021
1,713
55,309
144
320,647
12,451
NON-INTEREST EARNING ASSETS
Cash and due from banks . . . . . . . . .
550
Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
11,397
TOTAL AVERAGE ASSETS . . . . . . $ 380,694
INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES
Savings, NOW, Money Markets . . . . . $ 203,185
Time deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
17,041
Total deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
220,226
Secured borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
405
405
Total interest-bearing liabilities . . . . .
220,631
NON-INTEREST BEARING
LIABILITIES
Demand deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
105,035
Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2,391
Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
107,426
Stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . .
52,637
TOTAL AVERAGE LIABILITIES AND
414
72
486
25
25
511
0.20 %
0.42 %
0.22 %
6.17 %
6.17 %
0.23 %
556
8,509
$ 329,712
$ 176,892
10,494
187,386
388
388
353
78
431
26
26
187,774
457
95,820
2,008
97,828
44,110
5.66% $ 147,330
2.20%
0.26%
3.88%
265,601
42,989
75,282
2,994
8,717
$ 277,312
13,107
0.20% $ 158,596
0.74%
0.23%
6.70%
6.70%
0.24%
171,703
172,152
449
449
8,891
1,722
101
10,714
6.03%
2.29%
0.23%
4.03%
345
92
437
29
29
466
0.22%
0.70%
0.25%
6.46%
6.46%
0.27%
72,202
1,605
73,807
31,353
EQUITY
$ 380,694
$ 329,712
$ 277,312
Net interest spread . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 15,657
Net interest margin . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.15 %
4.25 %
$ 11,994
3.64%
3.74%
10,248
3.76%
3.86%
17
The following table presents the dollar amount of changes in interest income and interest expense for major
components of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities for the periods indicated. The table distinguishes
between: (1) changes attributable to volume (changes in volume multiplied by the prior period’s rate); (2) changes
attributable to rate (change in rate multiplied by the prior year’s volume) and (3) total increase (decrease) (the sum of the
previous columns). Changes attributable to both volume and rate are allocated ratably between the volume and rate
categories.
Interest earned on:
Loans
Securities, includes restricted stock
Interest earning cash
Total interest income
Interest paid on:
Savings, NOW, Money Markets
Time deposits
Total deposits
Secured borrowings
Total interest expense
Change in net interest income
Interest earned on:
Loans
Securities, includes restricted stock
Interest earning cash
Total interest income
Interest paid on:
Savings, NOW, Money Markets
Time deposits
Total deposits
Secured borrowings
Total interest expense
Change in net interest income
For the Year Ended
December 31,
2016 vs. 2015
Increase
(Decrease) due to
Volume
Rate
(Dollars in thousands)
Total
Increase
(Decrease)
$
$
$
$
3,446 $
210
(77)
3,579
54
36
90
1
91
3,488 $
31 $
(48)
155
138
7
(42)
(35)
(2)
(37)
175 $
3,477
162
78
3,717
61
(6)
55
(1)
54
3,663
For the Years Ended
December 31,
2015 vs. 2014
Increase
(Decrease) due to
Volume
Rate
(Dollars in thousands)
Total
Increase
(Decrease)
2,290 $
61
31
2,382
38
(19)
19
(4)
15
2,367 $
(587) $
(70)
12
(645)
(30)
5
(25)
1
(24)
(621) $
1,703
(9)
43
1,737
8
(14)
(6)
(3)
(9)
1,746
Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015
General. Net income increased $1.7 million or 140.8%, to $2.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2016
from $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase resulted from a $3.7 million increase in net
interest income and an $1.2 million increase in noninterest income, which were partially offset by a $2.4 million increase
in noninterest expense.
18
Interest Income. Interest income increased $3.7 million or 29.9%, to $16.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2016 from $12.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. This was attributable to an increase in
interest and fees on loans, which increased $3.5 million, or 32.8%, to $14.1 million for the year ended December 31,
2016 from $10.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.
The increase in interest income on loans was due to an increase in average balance of loans of $60.8 million, or
32.4%, to $248.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $187.3 million for the year ended December 31,
2015. This increase was due to our continued success in growing multifamily loans, commercial real estate loans,
commercial loans and consumer loans.
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased $54,000, or 11.8%, to $511,000 for the year ended December 31,
2016 from $457,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015, caused by an increase in average-interest bearing deposits.
The average rate we paid on interest bearing deposits decreased 1 basis point to 0.22% for the year ended December 31,
2016 from 0.23% for the year ended December 31, 2015. Our average balance of interest bearing deposits increased
$26.3 million, or 14.9%, to $203.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $176.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2015.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased $3.7 million, or 30.5%, to $15.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2016 from $12.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. Our net interest rate spread increased 51
basis points to 4.15% for the year ended December 31, 2016 from 3.64% for the year ended December 31, 2015, while
our net interest margin increased 51 basis points to 4.25% for the year ended December 31, 2016 from 3.74% for the
year ended December 31, 2015. Although the average yield we earned on interest earning assets increased 50 basis
points to 4.38%, we were able to decrease the average rate we paid on interest bearing liabilities by 1 basis point to
0.22%.
Provision for Loan Losses. Our provision for loan losses was $595,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016
compared to $930,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015. The provisions recorded resulted in an allowance for loan
losses of $3.4 million, or 1.23% of total loans at December 31, 2016, compared to $2.8 million, or 1.25% of total loans at
December 31, 2015.
Noninterest Income. Noninterest income information is as follows:
Noninterest income
Customer related fees and service charges
Merchant processing income
Gains of sales of securities
Total noninterest income
For the Year Ended
December 31,
2016
2015
(Dollars in thousands)
Amount
Change
Percent
$
$
1,180 $
2,939
6
4,125 $
741 $
2,202
—
2,943 $
439
737
6
1,182
59.2%
33.5
N/A
40.2%
Merchant processing income increased significantly due to significant growth in our business. Average monthly
volumes increased to $302.8 million for 2016 compared to $269.2 million for 2015. Customer related fees and charges
have increased due to overall increases in the balances and count of our deposit customers.
19
Noninterest Expense. Noninterest expense information is as follows:
Noninterest expense
Employee compensation and benefits
Occupancy and equipment
Professional and consulting services
FDIC assessment
Advertising and marketing
Travel and business relations
OCC assessments
Data processing
Other operating expenses
Total noninterest expense
For the Year Ended
December 31,
2016
2015
(Dollars in thousands)
Amount
Change
Percent
$
$
8,244 $
1,604
1,642
99
430
324
112
1,369
775
14,599 $
6,251 $
1,412
1,699
245
334
301
105
1,187
637
12,171 $
1,993
192
(57 )
(146 )
96
23
7
182
138
2,428
31.9%
13.6
(3.4)
(59.6)
28.7
7.6
6.7
15.3
21.7
19.9%
Salaries and employee benefits increased for the year ended December 31, 2016 from the year ended
December 31, 2015 primarily due to increases in the number of employees, increases in incentive compensation tied to
performance and salary increases. Occupancy and equipment expense increased primarily due to write-offs related to the
closure of our New York City administrative office.
Income Tax Expense. We recorded an income tax expense of $1.8 million for the year ended December 31,
2016, reflecting an effective tax rate of 38.5%, compared to $664,000, or 36.2%, for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014
General. Net income increased $1.1 million, to $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 from
$41,000 for the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase was due to an increase in net interest income and
noninterest income.
Interest Income. Interest income increased $1.7 million, or 16.3%, to $12.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2015 from $10.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. This was caused by an increase in interest
and fees on loans, which increased $1.7 million, or 19.2%, to $10.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 from
$8.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2014.
The increase in interest income on loans was due to an increase in the average balance of loans of $40.0 million,
or 27.1%, to $187.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 from $147.3 million for the year ended December 31,
2014. This increase was due to our continued success in growing residential real estate, multifamily, commercial real
estate loans, commercial, and consumer loans. The increase in the average balance of loans was partially offset by a 37
basis point decrease in yield to 5.66% for the year ended December 31, 2015 from 6.03% for the year ended December
31, 2014, due to the continued payoff of higher-yielding loans and our originating new loans in a lower interest rate
environment.
Interest on investment securities decreased $9,000 to $1.7 million of the year ended December 31, 2015. An
increase in average balance of $2.7 million, or 3.6%, offset a 9 basis point decrease in yield on investment securities to
2.20% during the year ended December 31, 2015 from 2.29% for the year ended December 31, 2014. We have been able
to use excess cash to originate loans that provide higher interest rates than the rates we could receive on investment
securities.
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased $9,000, or 1.9%, to $457,000 for the year ended December 31,
2015 from $466,000 for the year ended December 31, 2014, caused by a decrease in interest expense on time deposits.
The decrease in interest expense on time deposits is primarily driven by lower average balances which decreased $2.6
million or 19.9% for the year ended December 31, 2015 from December 31, 2014.
20
Interest expense on deposits was $431,000 and $437,000 for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014,
respectively. However, our average balance of interest bearing deposits increased $15.7 million, or 9.1%, to $187.4
million for the year ended December 31, 2015 from $171.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase
resulted from increases in the average balance of all deposit categories, except for time deposits. The increase in our
average balance of interest bearing deposits was primarily due to an increase savings, NOW, and money market
accounts, which increased $18.3 million, or 11.5%, to $176.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 from $158.6
million for the year ended December 31, 2014. However, the average interest rate we paid on savings, NOW and money
market accounts 2 basis points to 0.20% for the year ended December 31, 2015 from 0.22% for the year ended December
31, 2014.
Our overall cost of funds for the year ended December 31, 2015 was enhanced by an increase in average non-
interest bearing deposits, which increased $23.6 million to $95.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 from
$72.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, as we have been successful in obtaining non-interest bearing
deposits from commercial loan customers as well as from our merchant services customers.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased $1.8 million, or 17.0%, to $12.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2015 from $10.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2014.
Our net interest rate spread decreased 12 basis points to 3.64% for the year ended December 31, 2015 from
3.76% for the year ended December 31, 2014, while our net interest margin decreased 12 basis points to 3.74% for the
year ended December 31, 2015 from 3.86% for the year ended December 31, 2014. The average yield we earned on
interest earning assets decreased, however, at the same time we were able to decrease the average rate we paid on interest
bearing liabilities.
Provision for Loan Losses. Our provision for loan losses was $930,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015
compared to $300,000 for the year ended December 31, 2014. The provisions recorded resulted in an allowance for loan
losses of $2.8 million, or 1.25% of total loans at December 31, 2015, compared to $2.2 million, or 1.25% of total loans at
December 31, 2014. The higher provision for loan losses was a result of the growth in the loan portfolio and related
impact to the allowance for loan losses.
Noninterest Income. Noninterest income information is as follows.
Noninterest income
Customer related fees and service charges
Merchant processing income
Gains on sales of securities
Total noninterest income
Years Ended December 31,
Change
2015
2014
(Dollars in thousands)
Amount
Percent
$
$
741 $
2,202
(cid:650)
2,943 $
471 $
1,143
151
1,765 $
270
1,059
(151)
1,178
57.3%
92.7
(100.0)
66.7%
Merchant processing income increased significantly during the year due to significant growth in our business.
Total active merchants as of December 31, 2015 were approximately 9,500 compared to approximately 6,500 active
merchants as of December 31, 2014. Customer related fees and charges have increased due to overall increases in the
balances and count of our deposit customers.
21
Noninterest Expense. Noninterest expense information is as follows.
Noninterest expense
Employee compensation and benefits
Occupancy and equipment
Professional and consulting services
FDIC assessment
Advertising and marketing
Travel and business relations
OCC assessments
Data processing
Other operating expenses
Total noninterest expense
Years Ended December 31,
Change
2015
2014
(Dollars in thousands)
Amount
Percent
$
$
6,251 $
1,412
1,699
245
334
301
105
1,187
637
12,171 $
5,525 $
1,774
1,065
306
367
296
130
1,103
696
11,262 $
726
(362)
634
(61)
(33)
5
(25)
84
(59)
909
13.1%
(20.4)
59.5
(19.9)
(9.0)
1.7
(19.2)
7.6
(8.5)
8.1%
Salaries and employee benefits increased for the year ended December 31, 2015 from the year ended December
31, 2014 primarily due to increases in employees, increases in incentive compensation tied to performance and salary
increases. Professional and consulting expenses increased primarily due to our charter conversions and corporate
reorganization. Occupancy and equipment expense decreased primarily due to the consolidation of our office facilities in
New York City.
Income Tax Provision. We recorded a provision for income taxes of $664,000 for the year ended December 31,
2015, reflecting an effective tax rate of 36.2%, compared to $410,000, or an effective tax rate of 90.9%, for the year
ended December 31, 2014. The higher effective tax rate in 2014 was due to additional New York state income tax
expense to adjust our state deferred tax assets and liabilities using newly exacted New York state income tax rates and
apportionment changes.
Management of Market Risk
General. The principal objective of our asset and liability management function is to evaluate the interest rate risk
within the balance sheet and pursue a controlled assumption of interest rate risk while maximizing net income and
preserving adequate levels of liquidity and capital. The board of directors of our bank has oversight of our asset and
liability management function, which is managed by our Asset/Liability Management Committee. Our Asset/Liability
Management Committee meets regularly review, among other things, the sensitivity of our assets and liabilities to market
interest rate changes, local and national market conditions and market interest rates. That group also reviews our
liquidity, capital, deposit mix, loan mix and investment positions.
As a financial institution, our primary component of market risk is interest rate volatility. Fluctuations in interest
rates will ultimately impact both the level of income and expense recorded on most of our assets and liabilities, and the
fair value of all interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities, other than those which have a short term to
maturity. Interest rate risk is the potential of economic losses due to future interest rate changes. These economic losses
can be reflected as a loss of future net interest income and/or a loss of current fair values. The objective is to measure the
effect on net interest income and to adjust the balance sheet to minimize the inherent risk while at the same time
maximizing income.
We manage our exposure to interest rates primarily by structuring our balance sheet in the ordinary course of
business. We do not typically enter into derivative contracts for the purpose of managing interest rate risk, but we may
do so in the future. Based upon the nature of our operations, we are not subject to foreign exchange or commodity price
risk. We do not own any trading assets.
Net Interest Income Simulation. We use an interest rate risk simulation model to test the interest rate
sensitivity of net interest income and the balance sheet. Instantaneous parallel rate shift scenarios are modeled and
utilized to evaluate risk and establish exposure limits for acceptable changes in net interest margin. These scenarios,
known as rate shocks, simulate an instantaneous change in interest rates and use various assumptions, including, but not
22
limited to, prepayments on loans and securities, deposit decay rates, pricing decisions on loans and deposits,
reinvestment and replacement of asset and liability cash flows.
The following table presents the estimated changes in net interest income of Esquire Bank, National
Association, calculated on a bank-only basis, which would result from changes in market interest rates over twelve-
month periods beginning December 31, 2016 and 2015. The tables below demonstrate that we are asset-sensitive in a
rising interest rate environment.
2016
2015
At December 31,
Changes in
Interest Rates
(Basis Points)
Estimated 12-
Months Net
Interest
Income
Change
(Dollars in thousands)
Estimated 12-
Months Net
Interest
Income
Change
400 $
300
200
100
0
-100
-200
24,445
23,083
21,714
20,339
18,926
17,260
16,220
5,519 $
4,157
2,788
1,413
(cid:650)
(1,166)
(2,706)
19,462
18,360
17,262
16,155
14,971
13,802
13,017
4,491
3,389
2,291
1,184
(cid:650)
(1,169)
(1,954)
Economic Value of Equity Simulation. We also analyze our sensitivity to changes in interest rates through an
economic value of equity (“EVE”) model. EVE represents the present value of the expected cash flows from our assets
less the present value of the expected cash flows arising from our liabilities adjusted for the value of off-balance sheet
contracts. EVE attempts to quantify our economic value using a discounted cash flow methodology. We estimate what
our EVE would be as of a specific date. We then calculate what EVE would be as of the same date throughout a series of
interest rate scenarios representing immediate and permanent, parallel shifts in the yield curve. We currently calculate
EVE under the assumptions that interest rates increase 100, 200, 300 and 400 basis points from current market rates, and
under the assumption that interest rates decrease 100 and 200 basis points from current market rates.
The following table presents the estimated changes in EVE of Esquire Bank, National Association, calculated
on a bank-only basis, that would result from changes in market interest rates as of December 31, 2016 and 2015.
2016
2015
At December 31,
Changes in
Interest Rates
(Basis Points)
Economic
Value of
Equity
Change
(Dollars in thousands)
Economic
Value of
Equity
Change
400 $
300
200
100
0
-100
-200
79,188
78,277
77,062
75,397
72,826
65,985
56,208
6,362 $
5,451
4,236
2,571
(cid:650)
(6,841)
(16,618)
66,005
65,377
64,751
63,909
62,009
55,246
46,863
3,996
3,368
2,742
1,900
(cid:650)
(6,763)
(15,146)
Many assumptions are used to calculate the impact of interest rate fluctuations. Actual results may be
significantly different than our projections due to several factors, including the timing and frequency of rate changes,
market conditions and the shape of the yield curve. The computations of interest rate risk shown above do not include
actions that our management may undertake to manage the risks in response to anticipated changes in interest rates, and
actual results may also differ due to any actions taken in response to the changing rates.
23
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity is the ability to meet current and future financial obligations of a short-term nature. Our primary
sources of funds consist of deposit inflows, loan repayments and maturities and sales of securities. While maturities and
scheduled amortization of loans and securities are predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments
are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition.
We regularly review the need to adjust our investments in liquid assets based upon our assessment of: (1)
expected loan demand, (2) expected deposit flows, (3) yields available on interest earning deposits and securities, and (4)
the objectives of our asset/liability management program. Excess liquid assets are invested generally in interest earning
deposits and short- and intermediate-term securities.
Our most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents. The levels of these assets are dependent on our operating,
financing, lending and investing activities during any given period. At December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, cash
and cash equivalents totaled $43.0 million and $33.1 million, respectively. Securities classified as available-for-sale,
which provide additional sources of liquidity, totaled $92.6 million at December 31, 2016 and $84.2 million at December
31, 2015.
At December 31, 2016, we had the ability to borrow a total of $72.8 million from the Federal Home Loan Bank
of New York. We also had an available line of credit with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York discount window of
$15.6 million. At December 31, 2016, we also had a $3.5 million and $4.0 million line of credit with Atlantic
Community Bankers’ Bank and Zions Bank, respectively. No amounts were outstanding on any of the aforementioned
lines as of December 31, 2016.
At December 31, 2015, we had the ability to borrow a total of $69.4 million from the Federal Home Loan Bank
of New York. At December 31, 2015, we also had an available line of credit with the Federal Reserve Bank of New
York discount window of $10.8 million. At December 31, 2015, we also had a $3.5 million and $4.0 million, line of
credit with Atlantic Community Bankers’ Bank and Zions Bank, respectively. No amounts were outstanding on any of
the aforementioned lines as of December 31, 2015.
We have no material commitments or demands that are likely to affect our liquidity other than set forth below.
In the event loan demand were to increase faster than expected, or any unforeseen demand or commitment were to occur,
we could access our borrowing capacity with the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York or obtain additional funds
through brokered certificates of deposit.
At December 31, 2016, we had $2.0 million in loan commitments outstanding. We also had $1.3 million in
standby letters of credit at December 31, 2016.
Certificates of deposit due within one year of December 31, 2016 totaled $22.3 million, or 6.0% of total
deposits. Total certificates of deposit were $24.0 million or 6.5% of total deposits.
At December 31, 2015 and 2014, we had $1.3 million and $846,000 in loan commitments outstanding,
respectively. We also had $1.3 million and $803,000 in standby letters of credit at December 31, 2015 and 2014,
respectively.
Certificates of deposit due within one year of December 31, 2015 totaled $6.4 million, or 2.1% of total deposits.
Total certificates of deposit were $9.9 million or 3.3% of total deposits. Given the small amount of reliance of these
funds, they do not have a significant impact on our liquidity.
Our primary investing activities are the origination, and to a lesser extent purchase, of loans and the purchase of
securities. During the year ended December 31, 2016, we originated or purchased $125.2 million of loans and $30.2
million of securities. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we originated or purchased $121.7 million of loans and
we purchased $24.7 million of securities. During the year ended December 31, 2014, we originated or purchased $91.1
million of loans, and we purchased $20.3 million of securities.
24
Financing activities consist primarily of activity in deposit accounts. We experienced net increases in total
deposits of $69.1 million, $10.9 million and $83.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014,
respectively. We generate deposits from law firms, other local businesses, and individuals through client referrals and
other relationships and through our retail presence. We believe we have a very stable core deposit base due primarily to
the litigation market strategy as we strongly encourage and are generally successful in having law firm borrowers
maintain their entire banking relationship with us. The high level of transaction accounts is expected to be maintained.
We have established deposit concentration thresholds to avoid the possibility of dependence on any single depositor base
for funds. Since inception, we have not had the need to borrow significantly from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New
York. We have been able to use the cash generated from the increases in deposits to fund loan growth in recent periods.
Esquire Bank, National Association is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by Office
of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. At December 31, 2016 and
December 31, 2015, Esquire Bank exceeded all applicable regulatory capital requirements, and was considered “well
capitalized” under regulatory guidelines. See Note 14 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
additional information.
The net proceeds from the stock offering will significantly increase our liquidity and capital resources. Over
time, the initial level of liquidity will be reduced as net proceeds from the stock offering are used for general corporate
purposes, including the funding of loans. Our financial condition and results of operations will be enhanced by the net
proceeds from the stock offering, resulting in increased net interest earning assets and net interest income. However, due
to the increase in equity resulting from the net proceeds raised in the stock offering, as well as other factors associated
with the stock offering, our return on equity will be adversely affected following the stock offering.
We manage our capital to comply with our internal planning targets and regulatory capital standards
administered by the OCC. We review capital levels on a monthly basis. At December 31, 2016, Esquire Bank was
classified as well-capitalized.
On November 2, 2012, the OCC notified Esquire Bank that it had established minimum capital ratios for
Esquire Bank, requiring Esquire Bank to maintain, commencing December 1, 2012, a Tier 1 Leverage Capital at least
equal to 9%, Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital at least equal to 11%, and Total Risk-Based Capital at least equal to 13%.
The following table presents our capital ratios as of the indicated dates for Esquire Bank.
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio
Bank
Tier 1 Risk-based Capital Ratio
Bank
Total Risk-based Capital Ratio
Bank
For Capital Adequacy
Purposes
Minimum Capital with
Conservation Buffer
Agreed to
Minimum Capital
Requirements
Actual
At December 31, 2016
“Well Capitalized”
5.00%
4.00%
9.00%
11.63%
8.00%
6.63%
11.00%
16.09%
10.00%
8.63%
13.00%
17.25%
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital Ratio
Bank
6.50%
5.13%
N/A
16.09%
25
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio
Bank
Tier 1 Risk-based Capital Ratio
Bank
Total Risk-based Capital Ratio
Bank
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital Ratio
Bank
“Well Capitalized”
Actual
At December 31, 2015
Actual
At December 31, 2014
5.00%
11.90%
10.06%
8.00%
15.91%
17.40%
10.00%
17.06%
18.54%
6.50%
15.91%
N/A
Basel III revised the capital adequacy requirements and the Prompt Corrective Action Framework effective
January 1, 2015 for Esquire Bank. When fully phased in on January 1, 2019, the Basel Rules will require Esquire Bank
to maintain a 2.5% “capital conservation buffer” on top of the minimum risk-weighted asset ratios. The capital
conservation buffer is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress. Banking institutions with a (i) CET1
to risk-weighted assets, (ii) Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets or (iii) total capital to risk-weighted assets above the
respective minimum but below the capital conservation buffer will face constraints on dividends, equity repurchases and
discretionary bonus payments to executive officers based on the amount of the shortfall. The implementation of the
capital conservation buffer began on January 1, 2016 at the 0.625% level and will increase by 0.625% on each
subsequent January 1, until it reaches 2.5% on January 1, 2019.
Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Contractual Obligations. In the ordinary course of our operations, we enter into certain contractual obligations.
The following table presents our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2016.
Contractual Maturities
Less Than One Year Through Years Through Over Five
More Than One More Than Three
Year
Three Years
Years
Total
Five Years
(In thousands)
Operating lease obligations
Time deposits
Total
$
$
489 $
22,335
22,824 $
796 $
1,620
2,416 $
828 $
—
828 $
2,222 $
—
2,222 $
4,335
23,955
28,290
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. We are a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the
normal course of business to meet the financing needs of our customers. These financial instruments include
commitments to extend credit, which involve elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized
in the consolidated balance sheets. Our exposure to credit loss is represented by the contractual amount of the
instruments. We use the same credit policies in making commitments as we do for on-balance sheet instruments.
For further information, see Note 11 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Effect of Inflation and Changing Prices
The consolidated financial statements and related financial data included in this prospectus have been prepared
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, which require the
measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without considering the change in
the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. The primary impact of inflation on our operations is
reflected in increased operating costs. Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all the assets and liabilities of a
financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates generally have a more significant impact on a
financial institution’s performance than do general levels of inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same
direction or to the same extent as the prices of goods and services.
26
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Crowe Horwath LLP
Independent Member Crowe Horwath International
Audit Committee and Stockholders
Esquire Financial Holdings, Inc.
Jericho, New York
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of Esquire Financial Holdings, Inc. as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated
statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to
perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Our audit included
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States). Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements.
An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Esquire Financial Holdings, Inc. as of December
31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Livingston, New Jersey
February 24, 2017
Crowe Horwath LLP
(cid:21)(cid:26)
ESQUIRE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks
Interest earning deposits
Total cash and cash equivalents
Securities available-for-sale, at fair value(cid:3)Securities,
restricted, at cost
Loans
Less: allowance for loan losses
loans, net
Premises and equipment, net
Accrued interest receivable
Deferred tax asset
Other assets
Total assets
LIABILITIES AND (cid:54)(cid:55)(cid:50)(cid:38)(cid:46)HOLDERS’ EQUITY(cid:3)
Deposits:
Demand
Savings, NOW and money market
Time
Total deposits
Secured borrowings
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
Total liabilities
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, par value $0.01; authorized 2,000,000 shares (non-voting); issued and outstanding 66,985 shares at December 31,
2016 and 157,985 shares at December 31, 2015
Common stock, par value $0.01; authorized 15,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 5,002,950 shares at December 31, 2016, and
4,911,870 shares at December 31, 2015
Additional paid-in capital
Retained deficit
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Total stockholders’ equity
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
(cid:21)(cid:27)
At December 31,
2016
2015
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
437
42,556
42,993
92,645
1,649
278,578
(3,413)
275,165
2,767
1,541
3,108
4,965
424,833
124,990
221,843
23,955
370,788
371
1,488
372,647
-
1
50
58,845
(5,826)
(884)
52,186
424,833
$
450
32,704
33,154
84,239
1,430
224,519
(2,799)
221,720
329
1,418
4,347
6,013
352,650
97,291
194,496
9,900
301,687
381
1,157
303,225
-
2
49
58,456
(8,648)
(434)
49,425
352,650
Interest income
Loans
Securities, available-for-sale
Interest earning deposits and other
Total interest income
Interest expense
Savings, NOW and money market deposits
Time deposits
Borrowings
Total interest expense
Net interest income
Provision for loan losses
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
Non-interest income
Customer related fees and service charges
Merchant processing income
Net gains on securities available-for-sale
Total non-interest income
Non-interest expense
Employee compensation and benefits
Occupancy and equipment, net
Professional and consulting services
Data processing
Advertising and marketing
Travel and business relations
OCC assessments
FDIC assessments
Other operating expenses
Total non-interest expense
Net income before income taxes
Income tax expense
Net income
Earnings per common share (See Note 10)
Basic
Diluted
ESQUIRE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
(cid:21)(cid:28)
For the Years Ended
December 31,
2016
2015
$
14,071
1,875
222
16,168
414
72
25
511
15,657
595
15,062
1,180
2,939
6
4,125
8,244
1,604
1,642
1,369
430
324
112
99
775
14,599
4,588
1,766
2,822
0.56
0.55
$
$
10,594
1,713
144
12,451
353
78
26
457
11,994
930
11,064
741
2,202
-
2,943
6,251
1,412
1,699
1,187
334
301
105
245
637
12,171
1,836
664
1,172
0.25
0.25
$
$
$
ESQUIRE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Dollars in thousands)
Net income
Other comprehensive loss:
Unrealized losses arising during the period on securities available-for-sale
Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income
Tax effect
Total other comprehensive loss
Total comprehensive income
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
(cid:22)(cid:19)
For the Years Ended
December 31,
2016
2015
2,822
$
1,172
(738)
6
282
(450)
2,372
$
(304)
-
120
(184)
988
$
$
ESQUIRE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Dollars in thousands)
Preferred
shares
Common
shares
Preferred
stock
Common
stock
Additional
paid in
capital
Retained
deficit
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
loss
Total
stockholders’
equity
Balance at January 1, 2015
157,985
4,088,410
$
Net income
Other comprehensive loss
Issuance of common stock net of offering
costs
Stock options expense
-
-
-
-
-
-
823,460
-
Balance at December 31, 2015
157,985
4,911,870
Net income
Other comprehensive loss
Exchange of preferred stock for common
stock
Issuance of common stock
Stock options expense
Balance at December 31, 2016
-
-
(91,000)
-
-
66,985
-
-
91,000
80
-
2
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
(1)
-
-
$
41
$
48,569
$
(9,820)
$
(250)
$
38,542
-
-
8
-
49
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
9,749
138
58,456
-
-
-
1
388
1,172
-
-
-
(8,648)
2,822
-
-
-
-
-
(184)
-
-
(434)
-
(450)
-
-
-
1,172
(184)
9,757
138
49,425
2,822
(450)
-
1
388
5,002,950
$
1
$
50
$
58,845
$
(5,826)
$
(884)
$
52,186
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
(cid:22)(cid:20)
ESQUIRE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:
Provision for loan losses
Net gains on securities available-for-sale
Depreciation
Stock options expense
Net amortization:
Securities
Loans
Changes in other assets and liabilities:
Accrued interest receivable
Deferred tax asset
Other assets
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
Write-offs related to offices closed
Net cash provided by operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities:
Originations and purchases of loans, net of principal repayments
Purchases of securities available-for-sale
Settlement of sales of securities available-for-sale
Proceeds of sales of securities available-for-sale
Principal repayments on securities available-for-sale
Purchase of securities, restricted
Redemption of securities, restricted
Other assets
Purchases of premises and equipment
Net cash used in investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase in deposits
Decrease in secured borrowings
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock
Net cash provided by financing activities
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period
For the Years Ended
December 31,
2016
2015
$
2,822
$
1,172
595
(6)
166
388
344
421
(123)
1,521
(202)
172
221
6,319
(54,461)
(30,235)
-
4,068
16,691
(453)
234
1,250
(2,666)
(65,572)
69,101
(10)
1
69,092
9,839
33,154
$
42,993 $
(cid:22)(cid:21)
930
-
237
138
256
395
(321)
546
(2,123)
292
47
1,569
(52,533)
(24,664)
6,719
-
10,790
(1,202)
9
-
(85)
(60,966)
10,913
(10)
9,757
20,660
(38,737)
71,891
33,154
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest
Taxes
Noncash disclosures:
Exchange of preferred stock for common stock
ESQUIRE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
(cid:22)(cid:22)
For the Years Ended
December 31,
2016
2015
$
$
508
234
1
458
95
-
ESQUIRE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016 and 2015
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
NOTE 1 — Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Business
Esquire Financial Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) is a registered bank holding company and the parent company of Esquire Bank, National Association (the “Bank”). In August of(cid:3)
2015, the Company and the Bank were converted from a savings and loan holding company and savings bank to a bank holding company and national bank, respectively, and the(cid:3)
Company, formerly a Delaware corporation, was reincorporated through a merger to a Maryland corporation.
The Bank is an independent, full-service national bank that serves the banking needs of law professionals, professional service firms, small to mid-sized businesses and individuals.(cid:3)
The Bank was established in 2006 and began operations in October 2006. The Bank’s headquarters is located in Jericho, New York. The Bank also operates a branch in Garden City,(cid:3)
New York and an administrative office in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida.
As a full-service bank, the Bank offers checking, savings, money market and time deposits; a wide range of commercial and consumer loans, as well as customary banking services.(cid:3)
Through electronic delivery channels, the Bank provides bill payment services, wire transfers, ACH origination, account transfers and real time deposit relationship updates. These(cid:3)
innovative services are complimented with a full range of traditional banking products and services. While the Bank is a full-service institution available to all potential customers, the(cid:3)
focus is marketing to law firms and other professional service firms, small to mid-sized businesses and individuals in the local community surrounding the branch office and New York(cid:3)
boroughs in order to grow the deposit base. Additionally, due, in part, to the substantial ties that many of the board members and organizers have to the legal community, the Bank(cid:3)
concentrates most of its marketing efforts on the legal community in these areas and nationally.
The Bank entered into the merchant service business as an acquiring bank in which credit and debit card transactions are settled on behalf of merchants. The revenue earned on(cid:3)
behalf of merchants, net of expenses, is paid to the independent sales organizations (ISO’s). The Bank’s revenue from this transaction is shown as merchant processing income on the(cid:3)
statements of income. Revenue is recognized when earned.
The consolidated financial statements include Esquire Financial Holdings, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Esquire Bank, N.A. and are referred to as “the Company.”(cid:3)
Intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation.
Basis of Presentation and Use of Estimates
The accounting and financial reporting policies are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The preparation of financial statements requires that(cid:3)
management make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial(cid:3)
statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Such estimates are subject to change in the future as additional information becomes available(cid:3)
or previously existing circumstances are modified. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Statement of Cash Flows
For purposes of the accompanying statements of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents are defined as the amounts included in the consolidated statements of financial condition(cid:3)
under the captions “Cash and Due from Banks” and “Interest Earning Deposits”, with contractual maturities of less than 90 days. Net cash flows are reported for customer loan and(cid:3)
deposit transactions.
Securities
All securities are classified as available-for-sale and carried at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on these securities are reported, net of applicable taxes, as a separate(cid:3)
component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a component of stockholders’ equity.
Interest income on securities, including amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts, is recognized using the level yield method without anticipating prepayments (except(cid:3)
for mortgage-backed securities where prepayments are
(cid:22)(cid:23)
ESQUIRE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016 and 2015
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
NOTE 1 — Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
anticipated) over the lives of the individual securities. Realized gains and losses on sales of securities are computed using the specific identification method.
Loans
Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future until maturity or payoff are stated at the principal amount outstanding, net of deferred loan fees
and costs for originated loans and net of unamortized premiums or discounts for purchased loans. Interest income is recognized using the level yield method. Net deferred loan fees,
origination costs, unamortized premiums or discounts are recognized in interest income over the loan term as a yield adjustment.
Non-Accrual
Interest income on mortgage and commercial loans is discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days delinquent unless the loan is well-secured and in process of collection. Consumer
loans are typically charged off no later than 120 days past due. Past due status is based on the contractual terms of the loan. In all cases, loans are placed on nonaccrual or charged-off at
an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful. Nonaccrual loans and loans past due 90 days still on accrual include both smaller balance homogeneous loans
that are collectively evaluated for impairment and individually classified impaired loans. A loan is moved to non-accrual status in accordance with the Company’s policy, typically after
90 days of non-payment.
All interest accrued but not received for loans placed on nonaccrual is reversed against interest income. Interest received on such loans is accounted for on the cash-basis or cost-
recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future
payments are reasonably assured.
Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable incurred credit losses. The allowance for loan losses is increased by provisions for loan losses charged to
income. Losses are charged to the allowance when all or a portion of a loan is deemed to be uncollectible. Subsequent recoveries of loans previously charged off are credited to the
allowance for loan losses when realized. Management estimates the allowance balance required using past loan loss experience, the nature and volume of the portfolio, information about
specific borrower situations and estimated collateral values, economic conditions and other factors. Allocations of the allowance may be made for specific loans, but the entire allowance
is available for any loan that, in Management’s judgment, should be charged off.
The allowance consists of specific and general components. The specific component relates to loans that are individually classified as impaired when, based on current information
and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.
Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments
when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment
delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the
reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.
All loans, except for consumer loans are individually evaluated for impairment. If a loan is impaired, a portion of the allowance is allocated as a specific allowance. The
measurement of an impaired loan is based on (i) the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, (ii) the loan’s observable market price or
(iii) the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.
Loans for which the terms have been modified resulting in a concession, and for which the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties, are considered troubled debt restructurings
and classified as impaired.
(cid:22)(cid:24)
ESQUIRE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016 and 2015
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
NOTE 1 — Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Troubled debt restructurings are separately identified for impairment disclosures and are measured at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s effective rate at(cid:3)
inception. If a troubled debt restructuring is considered to be a collateral dependent loan, the loan is reported, net, at the fair value of the collateral. For troubled debt restructurings that(cid:3)
subsequently default, the Company determines the amount of reserve in accordance with the accounting policy for the allowance for loan losses.
The general component is based on historical loss experience adjusted for current factors. The historical loss experience is determined by portfolio segment and is based on the(cid:3)
actual loss history experienced by the Company. This actual loss experience is supplemented with other economic factors based on the risks present for each portfolio segment. These(cid:3)
economic factors include consideration of the following: levels of and trends in delinquencies and impaired loans; levels of and trends in charge-offs and recoveries; trends in volume(cid:3)
and terms of loans; effects of any changes in risk selection and underwriting standards; other changes in lending policies, procedures, and practices; experience, ability, and depth of(cid:3)
lending management and other relevant staff; national and local economic trends and conditions; industry conditions; and effects of changes in credit concentrations.
Management has identified the following loan segments: Commercial Real Estate, Multifamily, Construction, Commercial, 1-4 Family Residential and Consumer. The risks(cid:3)
associated with a concentration in real estate loans include potential losses from fluctuating values of land and improved properties. Commercial Real Estate and Multifamily loans are(cid:3)
expected to be repaid from the cash flow of the underlying property so the collective amount of rents must be sufficient to cover all operating expenses, property management and(cid:3)
maintenance, taxes and debt service. Increases in vacancy rates, interest rates or other changes in general economic conditions can all have an impact on the borrower and their ability to(cid:3)
repay the loan. Construction loans are considered riskier than commercial financing on improved and established commercial real estate. The risk of potential loss increases if the(cid:3)
original cost estimates or time to complete are significantly off. The remainder of the loan portfolio is comprised of commercial and consumer loans. The primary risks associated with(cid:3)
the commercial loans is the cash flow of the business, the experience and quality of the borrowers’ management, the business climate, and the impact of economic factors. The primary(cid:3)
risks associated with 1-4 Family Residential and Consumer loans relate to the borrower, such as the risk of a borrower’s unemployment as a result of deteriorating economic conditions(cid:3)
or the amount and nature of a borrower’s other existing indebtedness, and the value of the collateral securing the loan if the Bank must take possession of the collateral.
Premises and Equipment
Premises and equipment, including leasehold improvements, are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. Equipment, which includes furniture and fixtures,(cid:3)
are depreciated over the assets’ estimated useful lives using the straight-line method (three to ten years). Amortization of leasehold improvements is recognized on a straight-line basis(cid:3)
over the lesser of the expected lease term or the estimated useful life of the asset. Costs incurred to improve or extend the life of existing assets are capitalized. Repairs and maintenance(cid:3)
are charged to expense.
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) Stock
The Bank is a member of the FHLB system. Members are required to own a certain amount of stock based on the level of mortgage related assets, borrowings and other factors.(cid:3)
FHLB stock is carried at cost, classified as a restricted security and periodically evaluated for impairment based on the ultimate recovery of par value. Dividends are reported as interest(cid:3)
income.
Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) Stock
The Bank is a member of its regional FRB. FRB stock is carried at cost, classified as a restricted security, and periodically evaluated for impairment based on ultimate recovery of(cid:3)
par value. Dividends are reported as interest income.
Loan Commitments and Related Financial Instruments
Financial instruments include off balance sheet credit instruments, such as commitments to make loans and commercial letters of credit, are issued to meet customer financing(cid:3)
needs. The face amount for these items represents the exposure to loss, before considering customer collateral or ability to repay. Such financial instruments are recorded when they are(cid:3)
funded.
(cid:22)(cid:25)
ESQUIRE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016 and 2015
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
NOTE 1 — Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Transfers of Financial Assets
Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales, when control over the assets has been relinquished. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when the
assets have been isolated from the Company, the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred
assets, and the Company does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity.
Income Taxes
Income taxes are provided for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences
between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted rates
expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is
recognized in income in the period the change occurs. Deferred tax assets are reduced, through a valuation allowance, if necessary, by the amount of such benefits that are not expected
to be realized based on current available evidence.
A tax position is recognized as a benefit only if it is “more likely than not” that the tax position would be sustained in a tax examination, with a tax examination being presumed to
occur. The amount recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized on examination. For tax positions not meeting the “more likely than
not” test, no tax benefit is recorded. The Company recognizes interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.
Earnings per Common Share
Basic earnings per common share is net earnings allocated to common stock divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. All
outstanding preferred shares are considered participating securities for computation of basic earnings per common share. Diluted earnings per common share include the dilutive effect
of additional potential common shares issuable under stock options.
Share-Based Payment
Share based payment guidance requires the Company to recognize the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity-based compensation issued to employees and non-
employees in the statements of income. A Black-Scholes model is utilized to estimate the fair value of stock options. Compensation cost for stock options are recognized as non-interest
expense in the statement of income on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of each stock option grant. Compensation cost for stock options includes the impact of an estimated
forfeiture rate. At December 31, 2016, no stock options had vesting conditions linked to the performance of the Company or market conditions.
Dividend Restriction
Banking regulations require maintaining certain capital levels and may limit the dividends paid by the bank to the holding company or by the holding company to shareholders.
Segment Reporting
The Company’s operations are exclusively in the financial services industry and include the provision of traditional banking services. Management evaluates the performance of the
Company based on only one business segment, that of community banking. In the opinion of management, the Company does not have any other reportable segments as defined by
Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 280, “Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”.
Restrictions on Cash
Cash on hand or on deposit with the FRB was required to meet regulatory reserve and clearing requirements.
(cid:22)(cid:26)
ESQUIRE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016 and 2015
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
NOTE 1 — Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Reclassifications
Some items in the prior year financial statements were reclassified to conform to the current presentation. Reclassifications had no effect on prior year net income or stockholders’(cid:3)
equity.
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income (loss) consists of net income and other comprehensive (loss) income. Other comprehensive (loss) income includes unrealized gains and losses on securities(cid:3)
available-for-sale which are also recognized as separate components of equity.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair values of financial instruments are estimated using relevant market information and other assumptions, as more fully disclosed in a separate note. Fair value estimates involve(cid:3)
uncertainties and matters of significant judgment regarding interest rates, credit risk, prepayments, and other factors, especially in the absence of broad markets for particular items.(cid:3)
Changes in assumptions or in market conditions could significantly affect the estimates.
Loss Contingencies
Loss contingencies, including claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business, are recorded as liabilities when the likelihood of loss is probable and an amount or(cid:3)
range of loss can be reasonably estimated. Management does not believe there now are such matters that will have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
New Accounting Pronouncements
Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” implements a common revenue standard that clarifies the principles for(cid:3)
recognizing revenue. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that(cid:3)
reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps: (i)(cid:3)
identify the contract(s) with a customer, (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (iii) determine the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance(cid:3)
obligations in the contract and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. In July 2015, the (Financial Accounting Standards Board FASB) deferred(cid:3)
the effective date of the ASU by one year which means ASU 2014-09 will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of(cid:3)
ASU 2014-09 on its consolidated financial statements.
On January 5, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, “Financial Instruments–Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (the ASU). Under(cid:3)
this ASU, the current GAAP model is changed in the areas of accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the fair value option, and the presentation and disclosure(cid:3)
requirements for financial instruments. In addition, the FASB clarified guidance related to the valuation allowance assessment when recognizing deferred tax assets resulting from(cid:3)
unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities. The ASU will be effective for public business entities in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods(cid:3)
within those fiscal years. Adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s operating results or financial condition.
On February 25, 2016, the FASB completed its Leases project by issuing ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).” The new guidance affects any organization that enters into a(cid:3)
lease, or sublease, with some specified exemptions. Under the new guidance, a lessee will be required to recognize assets and liabilities for leases with lease terms of more than 12(cid:3)
months. Consistent with current GAAP, the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee primarily will depend on its(cid:3)
classification as a finance or operating lease. However, unlike current GAAP, which requires only capital leases to be recognized on the balance sheet, the new ASU will require both(cid:3)
types of leases to be recognized on the balance sheet. The ASU will also require expanded disclosures. The ASU on leases will take effect for fiscal years beginning after December 15,(cid:3)
2018, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the ASU on its financial condition and results of operations.
(cid:22)(cid:27)
ESQUIRE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016 and 2015
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
NOTE 1 — Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): “Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.” This update
includes multiple provisions intended to simplify various aspects of the accounting for share-based payments. For public companies, the amendments in this update are effective for
annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted for any organization in any interim or annual period.
Adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s operating results or financial condition.
On June 16, 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial
Instruments” (the ASU). This ASU replaces the incurred loss model with an expected loss model, referred to as “current expected credit loss” (CECL) model. It will significantly change
estimates for credit losses related to financial assets measured at amortized cost, including loans receivable, held-to-maturity (HTM) debt securities and certain other contracts. This ASU
will be effective for the Company in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently in the process of
evaluating the impact of this ASU on its financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Subsequent Events
The Bank has evaluated subsequent events for recognition and disclosure through the date of issuance.
NOTE 2 — Securities
Available-for-Sale Securities
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and estimated fair value of securities available-for-sale were as follows at December 31:
2016
Mortgage-backed securities - agency
Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMO’s) – agency
Total available-for-sale
2015
Government agency debentures
Mortgage-backed securities - agency
Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMO’s) – agency
Total available-for-sale
Gross
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
16,417
77,677
94,094
4,064
17,445
63,447
$
$
$
12
56
68
-
27
116
(417)
(1,100)
$
(1,517) $
$
(63)
(325)
(472)
16,012
76,633
92,645
4,001
17,147
63,091
84,956
$
143
$
(860)
$
84,239
The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities are shown by contractual maturity. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities if borrowers have the right to call(cid:3)
or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Securities not due at a single maturity date are shown separately.
(cid:22)(cid:28)
ESQUIRE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016 and 2015
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
NOTE 2 — Securities (Continued)
Government agency debentures
Due from one to five years
Five to ten years
Mortgage-backed securities - agency
CMO’s – agency
Total
December 31, 2016
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
$
$
$
-
-
16,417
77,677
94,094
$
-
-
16,012
76,633
92,645
Mortgage-backed securities included all residential pass-through certificates guaranteed by FHLMC, FNMA, or GNMA and the CMO’s are backed by government agency pass-
through certificates. The 2016 and 2015 pass-through certificates are fixed rate instruments. CMO’s, by virtue of the underlying residential collateral or structure, are fixed rate current
pay sequentials or planned amortization classes (PAC’s).
When purchasing investment securities, the Company’s overall interest-rate risk profile is considered as well as the adequacy of expected returns relative to risks assumed, including
prepayments. In continuously managing the investment securities portfolio, management occasionally sells investment securities in response to, or in anticipation of, changes in interest
rates and spreads, actual or anticipated prepayments, liquidity needs and credit risk associated with a particular security.
The proceeds from sales and calls of securities and the associated gains and losses are listed below:
Proceeds
Gross gains
Gross losses
The tax provision related to these gains was $2 for 2016.
2016
2015
$
$
4,068
6
-
-
-
-
At December 31, 2016, securities having a fair value of $76,633 were pledged to the FHLB for borrowing capacity totaling $72,837. At December 31, 2015, securities having a fair
value of $73,100 were pledged to the FHLB for borrowing capacity totaling $69,400. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company had no outstanding FHLB advances.
At December 31, 2016, securities having a fair value of $16,012 were pledged to the FRB of New York for borrowing capacity totaling $15,580. At December 31, 2015, securities
having a fair value of $11,100 were pledged to FRB of New York for borrowing capacity totaling $10,800. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company had no outstanding FRB
borrowings.
The following table provides the gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time the individual securities have been in a continuous
unrealized loss position, as of December 31:
Less Than 12 Months
12 Months or Longer
Total
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
December 31, 2016
Mortgage-backed securities – agency
CMO’s - agency
Total temporarily impaired securities
$
$
13,936
50,269
64,205
$
$
(417)
(859)
(1,276)
$
$
(cid:23)(cid:19)
-
5,973
5,973
$
$
-
(241)
(241)
$
$
13,936
56,242
70,178
$
$
(417)
(1,100)
(1,517)
ESQUIRE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016 and 2015
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
NOTE 2 — Securities (Continued)
Less Than 12 Months
12 Months or Longer
Total
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
December 31, 2015
Government agency debentures
Mortgage-backed securities – agency
CMO’s - agency
Total temporarily impaired securities
$
$
2,029
10,310
23,401
35,740
$
$
(34)
(240)
(147)
(421)
$
$
1,972
4,228
7,687
13,887
$
$
(29)
(85)
(325)
(439)
$
$
4,001
14,538
31,088
49,627
$
$
(63)
(325)
(472)
(860)
Management reviews the investment portfolio on a quarterly basis to determine the cause, magnitude and duration of declines in the fair value of each security. In estimating other-
than-temporary impairment (OTTI), management considers many factors including: (1) the length of time and extent that fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition
and near term prospects of the issuer, (3) whether the market decline was affected by macroeconomic conditions, and (4) whether the Company has the intent to sell the security or more
likely than not will be required to sell the security before its anticipated recovery. If either of the criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met, the entire difference between
amortized cost and fair value is recognized as impairment through earnings. For debt securities that do not meet the aforementioned criteria, the amount of impairment is split into two
components as follows: (1) OTTI related to credit loss, which must be recognized in the income statement and (2) OTTI related to other factors, which is recognized in other
comprehensive income. The credit loss is defined as the difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis. The assessment of
whether any other than temporary decline exists may involve a high degree of subjectivity and judgment and is based on the information available to management at a point in time.
Management evaluates securities for OTTI at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation.
At December 31, 2016, securities in unrealized loss positions were issuances from government sponsored entities. Due to the decline in fair value attributable to changes in interest
rates and illiquidity, not credit quality and because the Company does not have the intent to sell the securities and it is likely that it will not be required to sell the securities before their
anticipated recovery, the Company does not consider the securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2016.
No impairment charges were recorded in 2016 and 2015.
(cid:23)(cid:20)
ESQUIRE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016 and 2015
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
NOTE 3 — Loans
The composition of loans by class is summarized as follows at December 31:
1-4 family residential
Commercial
Multifamily
Commercial real estate
Construction
Consumer
Total Loans
Deferred costs and unearned premiums, net
Allowance for loan losses
2016
% of
Total
2015
% of
Total
$
49,597
106,064
83,410
22,198
5,610
10,571
277,450
1,128
(3,413)
18% $
38
30
8
2
4
28,531
83,563
71,184
21,272
5,297
13,556
100%
223,403
1,116
(2,799)
13%
37
32
10
2
6
100%
Net loans
$
275,165
$
221,720
The following tables present the activity in the allowance for loan losses by class for the years ending December 31, 2016 and 2015:
December 31, 2016
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance
Provision (credit) for loan losses
Recoveries
Loans charged-Off
Total ending allowance balance
December 31, 2015
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance
Provision (credit) for loan losses
Recoveries
Loans charged-off
1-4 Family
Residential
Commercial
Multifamily
Commercial
Real Estate
Construction
Consumer
Total
$
$
$
$
213
147
-
-
$
1,536
372
26
-
$
533
88
-
-
$
230
8
-
-
$
134
7
-
-
$
153
(27)
-
(7)
2,799
595
26
(7)
360
$
1,934
$
621
$
238
$
141
$
119
$
3,413
$
162
51
-
-
$
1,222
610
-
(296)
$
528
5
-
-
$
97
133
-
-
$
27
107
-
-
$
129
24
-
-
2,165
930
-
(296)
Total ending allowance balance
$
213
$
1,536
$
533
$
230
$
134
$
153
$
2,799
(cid:23)(cid:21)
ESQUIRE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016 and 2015
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
NOTE 3 — Loans (Continued)
The following tables present the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by class and based on impairment method as of December 31, 2016
and 2015:
1-4 Family
Residential
Commercial
Multifamily
Commercial
Real Estate
Construction
Consumer
Total
December 31, 2016
Allowance for loan losses:
Ending allowance
Balance attributable to loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment
Collectively evaluated for impairment
Total ending allowance balance
Loans:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment
$
$
$
-
360
360
-
49,597
$
$
$
-
1,934
1,934
-
106,064
$
$
$
-
621
621
-
83,410
$
$
$
-
238
238
-
22,198
$
$
$
-
141
141
-
5,610
$
$
$
-
119
119
-
10,571
$
$
$
-
3,413
3,413
-
277,450
Total ending loans balance
$
49,597
$ 106,064
$
83,410
$
22,198
$
5,610
$
10,571
$ 277,450
Recorded investment is not adjusted for accrued interest, unearned premiums or deferred costs due to immateriality.
(cid:23)(cid:22)
ESQUIRE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016 and 2015
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
NOTE 3 — Loans (Continued)
December 31, 2015
Allowance for loan losses:
Ending allowance
Balance attributable to loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment
Collectively evaluated for impairment
Total ending allowance balance
Loans:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment
1-4 Family
Residential
Commercial
Multifamily
Commercial
Real Estate
Construction
Consumer
Total
$
$
$
-
213
213
-
28,531
$
$
$
-
1,536
1,536
-
83,563
$
$
$
-
533
533
-
71,184
$
$
$
-
230
230
-
21,272
$
$
$
-
134
134
-
5,297
$
$
$
-
153
153
-
13,556
$
$
$
-
2,799
2,799
-
223,403
Total ending loans balance
$
28,531
$
83,563
$
71,184
$
21,272
$
5,297
$
13,556
$ 223,403
Non-Performing Loans
Non-performing loans include loans 90 days past due and still accruing and non-accrual loans. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, none of the Company’s loans met these conditions.
The following tables present the aging of the recorded investment in past due loans by class of loans as of December 31, 2016 and 2015:
30 - 59
Days
Past Due
60 - 89
Days
Past Due
Greater than
90 Days
Past Due
Total
Past Due
Loans Not
Past Due
Total
December 31, 2016
1-4 family residential
Commercial
Multifamily
Commercial real estate
Construction
Consumer
Total
$
$
$
203
-
-
-
-
-
203
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
$
203
-
-
-
-
-
$
49,394
106,064
83,410
22,198
5,610
10,571
49,597
106,064
83,410
22,198
5,610
10,571
203
$
277,247
$
277,450
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
(cid:23)(cid:23)
ESQUIRE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016 and 2015
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
30 - 59
Days
Past Due
60 - 89
Days
Past Due
Greater than
90 Days
Past Due
Total
Past Due
Loans Not
Past Due
Total
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
$
28,531
83,563
71,184
21,272
5,297
13,556
28,531
83,563
71,184
21,272
5,297
13,556
223,403
$
223,403
NOTE 3 — Loans (Continued)
December 31, 2015
1-4 family residential
Commercial
Multifamily
Commercial real estate
Construction
Consumer
Total
Credit Quality Indicators
The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information,
historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Company analyzes loans individually by classifying the
loans as to credit risk. This analysis is performed whenever a credit is extended, renewed or modified, or when an observable event occurs indicating a potential decline in credit quality,
and no less than annually for large balance loans.
The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings:
Special Mention - Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves management's close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may
result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institution's credit position at some future date.
Substandard - Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans
so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain
some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.
Doubtful - Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or
liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.
Loans not meeting the criteria above that are analyzed individually as part of the above described process are considered to be pass rated loans.
Based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of loans by class of loans is as follows:
December 31, 2016
1-4 family residential
Commercial
Multifamily
Commercial real estate
Construction
Consumer
Total
Pass
Special
Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
$
49,597
105,777
83,410
22,198
5,610
10,571
$
-
287
-
-
-
-
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
277,163
$
287
$
-
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
(cid:23)(cid:24)
NOTE 3 — Loans (Continued)
December 31, 2015
1-4 family residential
Commercial
Multifamily
Commercial real estate
Construction
Consumer
Total
ESQUIRE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016 and 2015
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Pass
Special
Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
$
$
$
28,531
80,765
71,184
21,272
5,297
13,556
$
-
2,798
-
-
-
-
220,605
$
2,798
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
The Company considers the performance of the loan portfolio and its impact on the allowance for loan losses. For residential and consumer loan classes, the Company evaluates
credit quality based on the aging status of the loan, which was previously presented, and by payment activity.
The Company has no loans identified as troubled debt restructurings at December 31, 2016 and 2015. Furthermore, there were no loan modifications during 2016 and 2015 that were
troubled debt restructurings. In order to determine whether a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, an evaluation is performed of the probability that the borrower will be in
payment default on any of its debt in the foreseeable future without the modification. This evaluation is performed under the Company’s internal underwriting policy.
Related Party Loans
Loans to related parties include loans to directors, their related companies and executive officers of the Company.
Loans to principal officers, directors, and their affiliates during 2016 were as follows:
Beginning balance
New advances
Repayments
Ending balance
Deposits from principal officers, directors, and their affiliates at year-end 2016 and 2015 were $4,944 and $6,143.
NOTE 4 — Premises and Equipment
The following is a summary of premises and equipment at December 31:
Leasehold improvements
Equipment
Construction in progress
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization
Total premises and equipment, net
(cid:23)(cid:25)
$
$
6,800
100
(3,536)
3,364
2016
2015
$
$
$
1,575
2,876
-
4,451
(1,684)
2,767
$
176
1,947
23
2,146
(1,817)
329
ESQUIRE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016 and 2015
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
NOTE 4 — Premises and Equipment (Continued)
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment, reflected as a component of occupancy and equipment, net in the statements of income, was $166 and $237 for the
periods ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. At year end 2016, management closed its New York City administrative office. This resulted in a $221 expense comprised of
leasehold improvements written off and accrual of the remaining lease obligation.
NOTE 5 — Deposits
The contractual maturities of certificates of deposit at December 31, 2016, are as follows:
2017
2018
Total
Total
22,335
1,620
23,955
$
$
Certificates of deposits greater than $250 were $751 as of December 31, 2016, and $745 at December 31, 2015. CDARS reciprocal deposits totaled approximately $15,800 at
December 31, 2016 and $1,800 at December 31, 2015.
NOTE 6 — Secured Borrowings
The Company had a secured borrowing of $371 and $381 as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, relating to certain loan participations sold by the Company that did not
qualify for sales treatment.
NOTE 7 — Income Taxes
The following summarizes components of income tax expense for the years ended December 31:
Current
Federal expense
State and city expense
Total current tax expense
Deferred
Federal expense
State and city expense
Tax expense
Tax expense
2016
2015
$
$
$
147
98
245
1,474
47
1,521
1,766
$
37
82
119
641
(96)
545
664
(cid:23)(cid:26)
ESQUIRE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016 and 2015
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
NOTE 7 — Income Taxes (Continued)
The following is a reconciliation of the Company’s statutory federal income tax rate of 34% to its effective tax rate at December 31:
Federal tax expense at statutory rate
State and local income taxes, net of federal income tax expense
Incentive stock options
Change to deferred tax as a result of tax reform
Other
Net tax expense
The following summarizes the components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at December 31:
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carry forwards
Pre-opening costs
Stock options expense
Allowance for loan loss
Fixed assets
Unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale
Other
Total deferred tax assets
Deferred tax liabilities:
Deferred rent
Deferred loan fees
Total deferred tax liabilities
Net deferred tax assets
$
$
$
2016
2015
$
1,560
97
71
-
38
1,766
$
2016
2015
$
1,136
172
308
1,208
(31)
565
145
3,503
(43)
(352)
(395)
624
(16)
4
16
36
664
2,516
208
236
954
136
283
81
4,414
-
(67)
(67)
$
3,108 $
4,347
The Company has federal, state, and city net operating loss carryforwards of $2,168, $9,743, and $2,714, respectively, as of December 31, 2016. The net operating losses are(cid:3)
available to reduce future taxable income. They begin to expire in 2026.
Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income. A valuation allowance is provided when it more likely than not that some portion of the(cid:3)
deferred tax asset will not be realized. Based on its evaluation, the Company has determined that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax asset as of December 31, 2016 and 2015,(cid:3)
will be realized.
The Company does not have any unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2016 or 2015, and does not expect this to increase significantly in the next twelve months. There were(cid:3)
no interest and penalties recorded in the statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. The Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income(cid:3)
tax of the state of New York and New York City. The Company is no longer subject to examination by taxing authorities for years before 2013.
(cid:23)(cid:27)
ESQUIRE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016 and 2015
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
NOTE 8 — Savings Plan
A savings plan is maintained under section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code and covers substantially all current full-time employees. Newly hired employees can elect to
participate in the savings plan after completing one month of service. Under the provisions of the savings plan, the Company does not match funds for employee contributions.
Participants can invest their account balances into several investment alternatives.
NOTE 9 — Share-Based Payment Plans
Stock Option Plan
The Company issues incentive and non-statutory stock options (“options”) to certain employees and directors pursuant to the 2007 Stock Option Plan (“the Plan”), which has been
approved by the stockholders. Options to purchase common stock are granted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The Plan allows for a maximum of
270,000 shares of common stock to be issued. As of December 31, 2016, 269,500 shares have been issued.
On May 26, 2011, the stockholders of the Company approved the Company’s 2011 Stock Compensation Plan (the “Stock Plan”). The Plan allows for a maximum of 404,607 shares
of common stock to be issued. On August 26, 2015, the stockholders of the Company approved an amendment to the Company’s 2011 Stock Compensation Plan to authorize an
additional 350,000 shares for issuance under the plan. The Company has issued 754,545 shares under the 2011 Stock Compensation Plan as of December 31, 2016.
Under the Stock Option Plans, options are granted with an exercise price equal to the fair value of the Company’s stock at the date of the grant. Options granted vest on five annual
installments (20% per annum) and have ten year contractual terms. All options provide for accelerated vesting upon a change in control (as defined in the Plan). Stock options exercised
result in the issuance of new shares.
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using a closed form option valuation (Black-Scholes) model that uses the assumptions noted in the table below.
Expected volatilities are based on peer volatility. The Company uses peer data to estimate option exercise and post-vesting termination behavior. The expected term of options granted is
based on peer data and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding, which takes into account that the options are not transferable. The risk-free
interest rate for the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant.
The fair value of options granted was determined using the following weighted-average assumptions as of grant date.
Risk-Free Interest Rate
Expected Term
Expected Stock Price Volatility
Dividend Yield
The weighted average fair value of options granted was $3.61 and $3.27 in 2016 and 2015.
(cid:23)(cid:28)
2016
2015
1.44%
84 months
24.1%
0.0%
1.88%
84 months
19.9%
0.0%
ESQUIRE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016 and 2015
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
NOTE 9 — Share-Based Payment Plans (Continued)
The following table presents a summary of the activity related to options as of December 31, 2016:
December 31, 2016
Outstanding at beginning of year
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited
Outstanding at year end
Vested or expected to vest
Exercisable at year end
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (Years)
11.95
12.50
-
-
12.13
12.13
11.35
7.33
7.33
3.62
Options
690,545
$
333,500
-
-
1,024,045
1,024,045
333,201
$
$
$
The Company recognized compensation expense related to options of $388 and $138 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. At December 31, 2016,
unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested options was approximately $2,200 and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 4.08 years. The intrinsic
value for outstanding, vested or expected to vest, and exercisable options at December 31, 2016, was approximately $400 for all three categories.
NOTE 10 — Earnings per Common Share
The two-class method is used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share. Under the two-class method, earnings available to common shareholders for the period are
allocated between common shareholders and participating securities according to participation rights in undistributed earnings. The factors used in earnings per share computation
follow:
Basic
Net income available to common shareholders
Less: Earnings allocated to participating securities
Net income allocated to common shareholders
Weighted average common shares outstanding
Basic earnings per common share
Diluted
Net income allocated to common shareholders for basic earnings per share
Weighted average shares outstanding for basic earnings per common share
Add: Dilutive effects of assumed exercises of stock options
Average shares and dilutive potential common shares
Diluted earnings per common share
2016
2015
2,822
62
2,760
4,958,655
0.56
2,760
$
$
$
1,172
40
1,132
4,460,098
0.25
1,132
4,958,655
30,550
4,460,098
30,550
4,989,205
4,490,648
0.55
$
0.25
$
$
$
$
Stock options totaling 837,170 and 537,795 shares of common stock were not considered in computing diluted earnings per common share for 2016 and 2015 because they were(cid:3)
anti-dilutive.
(cid:24)(cid:19)
ESQUIRE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016 and 2015
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
NOTE 11 — Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
Change-In-Control Arrangements
Certain key executive officers have arrangements that provide for the payment of a multiple of base salary, should a change-in control, as defined, occur. These payments are limited
under guidelines for deductibility pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code.
Credit Related Commitments
The Company provides the following types of off-balance sheet financial products to customers:
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to customers in accordance with contractual provisions. These commitments usually have fixed expiration dates or other
termination clauses and may require the payment of a fee. Total commitments outstanding do not necessarily represent future cash flow requirements, since many commitments expire
without being funded.
Each customer’s creditworthiness is evaluated prior to issuing these commitments and may require the customer to pledge certain collateral (i.e., inventory, income-producing
property) prior to the extension of credit. Fixed rate commitments are subject to interest rate risk based on changes in prevailing rates during the commitment period. The Company is
subject to credit risk in the event that the commitments are drawn upon and the customer is unable to repay the obligation.
Letters of credit are irrevocable commitments issued at the request of customers. They authorize the beneficiary to draw drafts for payment in accordance with the stated terms and
conditions. Letters of credit substitute the Company’s creditworthiness for that of the customer and are issued for a fee commensurate with the risk.
The Company can issue two types of letters of credit: Commercial (documentary) Letters of Credit and Standby Letters of Credit. Commercial Letters of Credit are commonly
issued to finance the purchase of goods and are typically short term in nature. Standby Letters of Credit are issued to back financial or performance obligations of a Bank customer, and
are typically issued for periods up to one year. Due to their long-term nature, standby letters of credit require adequate collateral in the form of cash or other liquid assets. In most
instances, standby letters of credit expire without being drawn upon.
The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as extending credit facilities to comparable customers.
The Company had $1,316 and $1,759 of fixed rate commitments to extend credit at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Company had $730 and $769 of variable rate
commitments to extend credit at December 31, 2016 and 2015. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company had standby letters of credit totaling $1,259.
Lease Commitments
At December 31, 2016, the Company was obligated under several non-cancelable leases for certain premises and equipment. The minimum annual rental commitments, exclusive of
taxes and other charges, under non-cancelable lease agreements for premises at December 31, 2016, are summarized as follows:
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Thereafter
Total lease commitments
(cid:24)(cid:20)
Minimum
Rentals
489
397
399
409
419
2,222
4,335
$
$
ESQUIRE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016 and 2015
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
NOTE 11 — Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Continued)
These leases contain periodic escalation clauses and all expiring leases are evaluated for extensions at renewal. Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015,
amounted to $573 and $531, respectively.
Litigation
The Company and its subsidiary are subject to certain pending and threatened legal actions that arise out of the normal course of business. In the opinion of management at the
present time, the resolution of any pending or threatened litigation will not have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 12 — Stockholders’ Equity
Sale of Common and Preferred Stock
In 2014, the Company, through various offerings during the year, sold an additional 583,967 shares of common stock, with total proceeds, net of offering costs, of approximately
$6,800. The net proceeds were used to support the Company’s continued growth and for general corporate purposes .
On December 23, 2014, an investor executed the purchase of 157,985 shares of 0.00% Series B Non-Voting Preferred Shares at a price of $12.50 per share for proceeds, net of
offering costs, of approximately $1,800. The preferred stock does not have a maturity date and is not convertible by the holder, but is convertible on a one for one basis into shares of
common stock by us under certain circumstances. In addition, the preferred stock does not have a liquidation preference. Preferred shares have equal rights to receive dividends when
dividends are declared on common stock, and thus are considered participating securities.
During 2015, the Company sold 823,460 shares of common stock for a total of $9,800. The net proceeds were used to support the Company’s continued growth and for general
corporate purposes.
In June 2016, the Company and the preferred shareholder agreed to perform an exchange of 91,000 shares of 0.00% of Series B Non-Voting Preferred Shares for 91,000 voting
common shares, par value $0.01.
NOTE 13 — Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in
an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair values.
Level 1 – Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.
Level 2 – Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other
inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3 – Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a company’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.
For available-for-sale securities where quoted prices are not available, fair values are calculated based on market prices of similar securities (Level 2).
(cid:24)(cid:21)
ESQUIRE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016 and 2015
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
NOTE 13 — Fair Value Measurements (Continued)
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:
December 31, 2016
Assets
Available-for-sale securities
Mortgage-backed securities - agency
CMO’s - agency
Total
December 31, 2015
Assets
Available-for-sale securities
Government agency debentures
Mortgage-backed securities - agency
CMO’s - agency
Total
Quoted Prices
In Active
Markets For
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Fair Value Measurements Using
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
16,012
76,633
92,645
4,001
17,147
63,091
84,239
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during the year. There were no assets measured on a non-recurring basis as of December 31, 2016 and 2015.
Estimated Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair value estimates are made at specific points in time and are based on existing on-and off-balance sheet financial instruments. Such estimates are generally subjective in nature(cid:3)
and dependent upon a number of significant assumptions associated with each financial instrument or group of financial instruments, including estimates of discount rates, risks(cid:3)
associated with specific financial instruments, estimates of future cash flows, and relevant available market information. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the(cid:3)
estimates. In addition, fair value estimates do not reflect the value of anticipated future business, premiums or discounts that could result from offering for sale at one time the(cid:3)
Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument, or the tax consequences of realizing gains or losses on the sale of financial instruments.
The Company used the following method and assumptions in estimating the fair value of its financial instruments:
Cash and Due from Banks and Interest Earning Deposits: Carrying amounts approximate fair value, since these instruments are either payable on demand or have short-term(cid:3)
maturities. Cash on hand and non-interest due from bank accounts are Level 1 and interest bearing deposits are Level 2.
(cid:24)(cid:22)
ESQUIRE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016 and 2015
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
NOTE 13 — Fair Value Measurements (Continued)
Securities Available-for-Sale: The fair values for securities available-for-sale are determined by quoted market prices, if available (Level 1). For securities where quoted prices
are not available, fair values are calculated based on market prices of similar securities (Level 2), using matrix pricing. Matrix pricing is a mathematical technique commonly used to
price debt securities that are not actively traded, values debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’
relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2 inputs).
Securities, Restricted: It is not practical to determine the fair value of FHLB and FRB stock due to restrictions placed on its transferability.
Loans: The estimated fair values of real estate mortgage loans and other loans receivable are based on discounted cash flow calculations that use available market benchmarks
when establishing discount factors for the types of loans resulting in a Level 3 classification. Exceptions may be made for adjustable rate loans (with resets of one year or less),
which would be discounted straight to their rate index plus or minus an appropriate spread. All nonaccrual loans are carried at their current fair value, if applicable. The method
utilized to determine fair value does not represent exit price.
Accrued Interest Receivable and Payable: For these short-term instruments, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of the fair value resulting in a Level 2 or 3
classification.
Deposits: The estimated fair value of certificates of deposits are based on discounted cash flow calculations that use a replacement cost of funds approach to establishing
discount rates for certificates of deposits maturities resulting in a Level 2 classification. Stated value is fair value for all other deposits resulting in a Level 1 classification.
Secured Borrowings: Borrowings represent secured borrowings and carrying value is a reasonable estimate of fair value resulting in a Level 2 classification.
Off-Balance-Sheet Liabilities: The fair value of off-balance-sheet commitments to extend credit is estimated using fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements. The
fair value is immaterial as of December 31, 2016 and 2015.
(cid:24)(cid:23)
ESQUIRE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016 and 2015
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
NOTE 13 — Fair Value Measurements (Continued)
The following table presents the carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s financial instruments:
Financial Assets:
Cash and due from banks
Interest earning deposits
Securities available-for-sale
Securities, restricted
Loans, net of allowance
Accrued interest receivable
Financial Liabilities:
Certificates of deposit
Demand and other deposits
Secured borrowings
Accrued interest payable
Financial Assets:
Cash and due from banks
Interest earning deposits
Securities available-for-sale
Securities, restricted
Loans, net of allowance
Accrued interest receivable
Financial Liabilities:
Certificates of deposit
Demand and other deposits
Secured borrowings
Accrued interest payable
NOTE 14 — Capital
Carrying
Value
(Level 1)
Fair Value Measurement at
December 31, 2016, Using:
(Level 2)
(Level 3)
Total
$
$
$
$
437
42,556
92,645
1,649
275,165
1,541
23,955
346,833
371
3
Carrying
Value
450
32,704
84,239
1,430
221,720
1,418
9,900
291,787
381
-
$
$
$
437
-
-
N/A
-
-
-
346,833
-
-
-
42,556
92,645
N/A
-
201
23,930
-
371
3
(Level 1)
Fair Value Measurement at
December 31, 2015, Using:
(Level 2)
$
450
-
-
N/A
-
-
-
291,787
-
-
-
32,704
84,239
N/A
-
205
9,881
-
381
-
$
-
-
-
N/A
277,620
1,340
-
-
-
-
437
42,556
92,645
N/A
277,620
1,541
23,930
346,833
371
3
(Level 3)
Total
$
-
-
-
N/A
224,715
1,213
-
-
-
-
450
32,704
84,239
N/A
224,715
1,418
9,881
291,787
381
-
Banks are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Capital adequacy guidelines and additionally for banks, prompt corrective action(cid:3)
regulations, involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications(cid:3)
are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators. Failure to meet capital requirements can initiate regulatory action. The final rules of implementing the Basel Committee on(cid:3)
Banking Supervision’s capital guidelines for U.S. Banks (Basel III rules) became effective for the Company on January 1, 2015, with full compliance with all of the requirements being(cid:3)
phased in over a multi-year schedule, and fully phased in by January 1, 2019. The net unrealized gain or loss on available for sale securities is not included in computing regulatory(cid:3)
capital. Management believes as of December 31, 2016, the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.
(cid:24)(cid:24)
ESQUIRE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016 and 2015
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
NOTE 14 — Capital (Continued)
Prompt corrective action regulations provide five classifications: well capitalized, adequately capitalized. Undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically
undercapitalized, although these terms are not used to represent overall financial condition. If adequately capitalized, regulatory approval is required to accept brokered deposits. If
undercapitalized, capital distributions are limited, as is asset growth and expansion, and capital restoration plans are required.
As of December 31, 2016, the most recent notification from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation categorized the Bank as “well capitalized” under the regulatory framework
for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as “well capitalized,” the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the
table below. Since that notification, there are no conditions or events that management believes have changed the institution’s category.
December 31, 2016
Total capital to risk weighted assets
Tier 1 (core) capital to risk weighted assets
Tier 1 (common) capital to risk weighted assets
Tier 1 (core) capital to adjusted total assets
December 31, 2015
Total capital to risk weighted assets
Tier 1 (core) capital to risk weighted assets
Tier 1 (common) capital to risk weighted assets
Tier 1 (core) capital to adjusted total assets
Actual
Amount
Ratio
Required
For Capital
Adequacy Purposes*
Ratio
Amount
For Capital
Adequacy Purposes
Including Capital
Conservation Buffer(1)
Ratio
Amount
To be Well
Capitalized Under
Prompt Corrective
Action Regulations*
Ratio
Amount
$
$
50,974
47,560
47,560
47,560
41,425
38,626
38,626
38,626
17.25% $
16.09
16.09
11.63
23,642
17,731
13,299
16,351
8.00% $
6.00
4.50
4.00
25,489
19,578
15,146
16,351
8.63% $ 29,552
23,642
6.63
19,209
5.13
20,439
4.00
17.06% $
15.91
15.91
11.90
19,426
14,567
10,925
12,984
8.00%
6.00
4.50
4.00
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
$ 24,282
19,422
15,781
16,229
10.00%
8.00
6.50
5.00
10.00%
8.00
6.50
5.00
* BASEL III revised the capital adequacy requirements and the Prompt Corrective Action Framework effective January 1, 2015 for the Bank.
(1) When fully phased in on January 1, 2019, the Basel Rules will require the Bank to maintain a 2.5% “capital conservation buffer” on top of the minimum risk-weighted asset
ratios. The capital conservation buffer is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress. Banking institutions with a (i) Common Equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted
assets, (ii)Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets or (iii) total capital to risk-weighted assets above the respective minimum but below the capital conservation buffer will face
constraints on dividends, equity repurchases and discretionary bonus payments to executive officers based on the amount of the shortfall. The implementation of the capital
conservation buffer began on January 1, 2016 at the 0.625% level and will increase by 0.625% on each subsequent January 1, until it reaches 2.5% on January 1, 2019.
In December 2012, the Board of Directors of the Bank ratified maintaining Tier I Leverage Capital at least equal to 9%, Tier I Risk-Based Capital at least equal to 11% and Total
Risk-Based Capital at least equal to 13%.
(cid:24)(cid:25)
ESQUIRE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016 and 2015
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
NOTE 15 — Parent Company Only Condensed Financial Information
Condensed financial information of Esquire Financial Holdings, Inc. follows:
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
Investment in banking subsidiary
Other assets
Total assets
LIABILITIES
Due to subsidiary
Other liabilities
Total liabilities
Stockholders’ equity
Preferred stock
Common stock
Additional paid-in-capital
Retained deficit
Other comprehensive loss
Total stockholders’ equity
Total liabilities and equity
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Interest income
Other expense
Loss before income tax and undistributed subsidiary income
Income tax benefit
Equity in undistributed subsidiary income
Net income
Comprehensive income
(cid:24)(cid:26)
At December 31,
2016
2015
$
$
$
4,473
47,085
660
52,218
-
32
32
1
50
58,845
(5,826)
(884)
52,186
52,218
$
For the Years Ended December 31,
2015
2016
$
100
(620)
(520)
(200)
3,142
2,822
2,372
$
$
7,459
40,393
1,710
49,562
90
47
137
2
49
58,456
(8,648)
(434)
49,425
49,562
-
(540)
(540)
(213)
1,499
1,172
988
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
ESQUIRE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016 and 2015
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
NOTE 15 — Parent Company Only Condensed Financial Information (Continued)
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income
Adjustments:
Stock options expense
Equity in undistributed subsidiary income
Change in other assets
Change in other liabilities
Net cash used in operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities
Investments in subsidiaries
Other assets
Net cash used in investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock
Net cash from financing activities
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
Beginning cash and cash equivalents
Ending cash and cash equivalents
For the Years Ended December 31,
2015
2016
$
2,822
$
388
(3,142)
(200)
(105)
(237)
(4,000)
1,250
(2,750)
1
1
(2,986)
7,459
$
4,473
$
(cid:24)(cid:27)
1,172
138
(1,499)
(213)
(438)
(840)
(3,000)
(1,250)
(4,250)
9,757
9,757
4,667
2,792
7,459
ESQUIRE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016 and 2015
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
NOTE 16 — Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The following is changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss by component, net of tax, for the years ending December 31, 2016 and 2015:
Year Ended December 31,
Beginning balance
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income
Net current period other comprehensive loss
Ending balance
2016
Unrealized Losses on
2015
Unrealized Losses on
Available for Sale Securities Available for Sale Securities
$
$
(434) $
(454)
4
(450)
(884) $
(250)
(184)
-
(184)
(434)
The following represents the reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2016, and 2015:
Realized gain on securities sales, AFS
Income tax expense
Total reclassifications, net of tax
Twelve months ended
December 31,
2016
2015
Affected Line in the
Consolidated Statement of Income
6
(2)
4
$
$
Net gains on securities available-for-sale
-
- Income tax expense
-
$
$
(cid:24)(cid:28)
COMMON STOCK INFORMATION
Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “ESQ”. As of
September 1, 2017, we had approximately 269 stockholders of record, who held 7,312,410 shares of our
outstanding common stock.
Prior to our initial public offering, which was completed on June 30, 2017, we did not trade on an
established public market.
We have not historically declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock and we do not expect
to pay cash dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future. Instead, we anticipate that all of our
future earnings will be retained to support our operations and to finance the growth and development of our
business. Any future determination to pay cash dividends on our common stock will be made by our board of
directors and will depend on a number of factors, including
(cid:120)
(cid:120)
(cid:120)
(cid:120)
(cid:120)
(cid:120)
(cid:120)
(cid:120)
(cid:120)
our historical and projected financial condition, liquidity and results of operations;
our capital levels and requirements;
statutory and regulatory prohibitions and other limitations;
any contractual restriction on our ability to pay cash dividends, including pursuant to the
terms of any of our credit agreements or other borrowing arrangements;
our business strategy;
tax considerations;
any acquisitions or potential acquisitions that we may examine;
general economic conditions; and
other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors.
As a Maryland corporation, we are subject to certain restrictions on dividends under the Maryland
General Corporation Code. Generally, Maryland law limits cash dividends if the corporation would not be
able to pay its debts in the usual course of business after giving effect to the cash dividend or if the
corporation’s total assets would be less than the corporation’s total liabilities plus the amount needed to
satisfy the preferential rights upon dissolution of stockholders whose preferential rights on dissolution are
superior to those receiving the distribution. We are also subject to certain restrictions on the payment of cash
dividends as a result of banking laws, regulations and policies.
Because we are a holding company, we are dependent upon the payment of dividends by Esquire
Bank to us as our principal source of funds to pay dividends in the future, if any, and to make other payments.
Esquire Bank is also subject to various legal, regulatory and other restrictions on its ability to pay dividends
and make other distributions and payments to us. A national bank may generally declare a cash dividend,
without approval from the OCC, in an amount equal to its year-to-date net income plus the prior two years’
net income that is still available for dividends. The OCC has the authority to prohibit a national bank from
paying cash dividends if such payment is deemed to be an unsafe or unsound practice. In addition, as a
depository institution the deposits of which are insured by the FDIC, Esquire Bank may not pay cash
dividends or distribute any of its capital assets while it remains in default on any assessment due to the FDIC.
Esquire Bank currently is not (and never has been) in default under any of its obligations to the FDIC.
The FRB has issued a policy statement regarding the payment of cash dividends by bank holding
companies. In general, the FRB’s policy provides that cash dividends should be paid only out of current
earnings and only if the prospective rate of earnings retention by the bank holding company appears
consistent with the organization’s capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. The FRB has the
60
authority to prohibit a bank holding company from paying cash dividends if such payment is deemed to be an
unsafe or unsound practice.
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Directors
Dennis Shields
Executive Chairman
Andrew C. Sagliocca
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Selig A. Zises
Retired Investor
Todd Deutsch
Private Investor and Entrepreneur
John Morgan
Founder, Attorney
Morgan & Morgan
Robert J. Mitzman
Founder and Chairman
Quick Group of Companies
Marc Grossman
Founding and Senior Partner
The Sanders Law Firm
Executive Officers
Dennis Shields
Executive Chairman
Eric S. Bader
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Corporate Secretary
Janet Hill
Principal
Hill Family Advisors
Anthony Coelho
Chair of the Advisory Board
Bender Consulting Services
Richard T. Powers
Owner
RT Powers & Associates
Jack Thompson
Head of Financial Services Investments
Gapstow Capital Partners
Russ M. Herman
Senior Partner
Herman, Herman & Katz, L.L.C.
Kevin C. Waterhouse
Vice President and Investment Advisor
L.M. Waterhouse & Company
Andrew C. Sagliocca
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Ari P. Kornhaber
Executive Vice President, Director of Sales
61
CORPORATE INFORMATION
Corporate Headquarters
Transfer Agent
100 Jericho Quadrangle, Suite 100
Jericho, New York 11753
(800) 996-0213
Website: www.esquirebank.com
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC
6201 15th Avenue
Brooklyn, New York 11219
(800) 937-5449
Special Counsel
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Luse Gorman, PC
5335 Wisconsin Ave., N.W., Suite 780
Washington, D.C. 20015
(202) 274-2000
Crowe Horwath LLP
488 Madison Avenue, Floor 3
New York, New York 10022-5702
(212) 572 5500
ANNUAL MEETING
The Annual Meeting of the Stockholders will be held on November 8, 2017 at 10:00 a.m., Eastern time, at
the executive offices of Esquire Financial Holdings, Inc. located at 100 Jericho Quadrangle, Jericho, New
York 11753.
GENERAL INQUIRIES
A copy of our Annual Report to the SEC may be obtained without charge by written request of stockholders
to Eric Bader or by calling us at (800) 996-0213. The Annual Report is also available on our website at
www.esquirebank.com. Our Code of Ethics, Audit Committee Charter, Corporate Governance and
Nominating Committee Charter, Compensation Committee Charter, and Beneficial Ownership reports of our
directors and executive officers are also available on our website.
62
(cid:3)
(cid:3)
(cid:3)
(cid:3)
(cid:3)
(cid:3)
(cid:3)
(cid:3)
(cid:3)
(cid:3)
(cid:3)
(cid:3)
(cid:3)
(This page has been left blank intentionally)
(cid:3)
(cid:3)
(cid:3)
(cid:3)
(cid:3)
(cid:3)
(cid:3)
(cid:3)
(cid:3)
(cid:3)
(cid:3)
(cid:3)
(cid:3)
(This page has been left blank intentionally)
(cid:3)
(cid:3)