2015
Annual Report
E
v
e
r
s
o
u
r
c
e
E
n
e
r
g
y
2
0
1
5
A
n
n
u
a
l
R
e
p
o
r
t
002CSN609F
Closing Share Price
Dividends Paid/Share
Shareholder Information
$53.52
$51.07
$36.07
$39.08
$42.39
$1.57
$1.67
$1.47
$1.32
$1.10
Shareholders
As of December 31, 2015, there were 42,655 common
shareholders of record of Eversource Energy holding an
aggregate of 317,191,249 common shares.
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
TDD for hearing impaired: 1-800-952-9245
Common Share Information
Total Shareholder Return
(Assumes $100 invested on December 31, 2010 with all dividends reinvested)
$200
$150
$100
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Eversource Energy
$100
EEI Index
$100
$117
$120
S&P 500
$100
$102
$131
$122
$118
$147
$138
$157
$192
$178
$178
$189
$171
$181
Direct Deposit for Quarterly Dividends
Direct deposit provides the convenience of automatic
and immediate access to your funds, while eliminating
the possibility of mail delays and lost, stolen or destroyed
checks. This service is free of charge to you. Please call
1-800-999-7269 to request an enrollment form.
Common Share Dividend Payment Dates
Last business day of March, June, September and
December.
The common shares of Eversource Energy are listed on the
New York Stock Exchange. The ticker symbol is “ES.” The
high and low daily prices and dividends paid for the past
two years, by quarters, are shown in the table below.
Year
Quarter High
Low
2015
First
Second
Third
Fourth
Second
Third
Fourth
$56.83
$51.42
$52.15
$52.85
$45.69
$47.60
$47.37
$56.66
$48.54
$45.20
$44.64
$48.18
$41.28
$44.28
$41.92
$44.37
Quarterly
Dividend
per Share
$0.4175
$0.4175
$0.4175
$0.4175
$0.3925
$0.3925
$0.3925
$0.3925
Corporate Governance
For information on Corporate Governance at Eversource,
go to our website, www.eversource.com, and select
“Investors” and then “Corporate Governance.”
Transfer Agent and Registrar
Computershare Investor Services
P.O. Box 43078
Providence, RI 02940-3078
1-800-999-7269
Shareholder Account Access
We have partnered with Computershare to offer you
online access to your important shareowner
communications in a single secure place. You can
manage your account online via the Investor Center
website, Computershare’s web-based tool for
shareholders at, www.computershare.com/investor.
Through free around-the-clock access to the Investor
Center website, you can view your account, access forms
and request a variety of account transactions.
Investor Relations
Jeffrey Kotkin:
Barbara Nieman:
John Gavin:
www.eversource.com/investors
Dividend Reinvestment Plan
860-665-5154
860-665-3249
781-441-8118
Eversource offers a dividend reinvestment plan. This plan
is sponsored by the company and not only offers the
reinvestment of dividends but provides both registered
shareholders and interested first-time investors an
affordable alternative for buying and selling Eversource
common shares. To request an enrollment package,
please call 1-800-999-7269 or log in to:
www.computershare.com/investor.
You may contact our Investor Relations Department:
2014
First
Selected Financial Data
(Thousands of dollars, except share information and statistical data)
Operating Revenues
Operating Income
Net Income Attributable to ES Common Shares
Diluted Earnings per Common Share (GAAP)
Diluted Earnings per Common Share (Non-GAAP) (1)
Diluted Common Shares Outstanding (Weighted Average)
Dividends Paid per Share
Sales of Electricity (Regulated Retail, kWh-millions)
Electric Customers (As of Year End)
Firm Sales of Natural Gas (million cubic feet)
Natural Gas Customers (As of Year End)
Investments in Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net (As of Year End)
Market Capitalization (As of Year End)
Share Price (As of Year End)
2015
7,954,827
1,764,164
878,485
2.76
2.81
318,432,687
1.67
54,616
3,139,608
98,458
511,288
1,724,139
19,892,441
16,198,957
51.07
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2014
7,741,856
1,632,849
819,546
2.58
2.65
317,417,414
1.57
54,442
3,119,675
99,500
500,703
1,603,744
18,647,041
16,964,948
53.52
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
(1) Diluted Earnings per Common Share (Non-GAAP) was adjusted to exclude integration-related costs. See Item 7, "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," in the accompanying Form 10-K for a reconciliation to GAAP.
Company Profile
Eversource Energy (NYSE:ES), a Fortune 500 and Standard &
Poor’s 500 energy company based in Connecticut,
Massachusetts and New Hampshire, operates New England’s
largest energy delivery system. Eversource is committed to
safety, reliability, environmental leadership and stewardship,
and expanding energy options for its 3.6 million electricity and
natural gas customers.
Eversource Service Territory
Electric
Gas
Combined Electric and Gas
1
By remaining faithful to our core mission to safely deliver reliable
energy and superior customer service, Eversource has been able to
consistently provide significant value to our customers, communities
and shareholders.
We have been thoughtful and innovative when it comes to meeting
our customers’ evolving needs, delivering top-quartile reliability and
addressing New England’s energy challenges. Our approach of
smart system investments, customer service excellence and
conservative financial management has enhanced our customer
service, provided strong leadership in the industry, and delivered a
very attractive level of earnings and dividend growth.
In 2015, we reported recurring earnings of $2.81 per share,
compared with recurring earnings of $2.65 in 2014, an increase of
six percent driven largely by higher retail electric and transmission
revenue, and effective cost discipline. That growth is consistent with
our longer term projected annual earnings per share growth rate of
five to seven percent, which is one of the most attractive growth
rates in the electric utility industry.
Our earnings growth also supports solid dividend growth for our
shareholders. In 2015, we raised our common dividend by 6.4
percent to an annualized rate of $1.67 per share, and in February
2016 we announced a 6.6 percent increase in the common dividend
to an annualized rate of $1.78 per share.
credit ratings lower interest costs, benefiting both customers and
shareholders.
Our strong financial performance has been a direct result of our
outstanding operating performance, highlighted by our best year
ever for electric reliability. Since 2011, Eversource’s frequency of
electric service interruptions, and the amount of time it takes to
restore customers’ power when outages occur, have both decreased
by about 40 percent. We have established an improved
enterprise-wide organizational model for our operations team, and
have successfully implemented a state-of-the-art electric
distribution management platform. This platform automates the
control and operation of our grid using self-healing technology,
enhances customer communication, and enables a consistent
customer experience across all three states. We continue to invest
Strong earnings and dividend growth have benefited our share price.
heavily in our electric distribution system, with capital expenditures
Over the past five years, Eversource has provided a cumulative total
totaling a record $783 million in 2015, up nearly 8 percent from
return to our shareholders of 89 percent, which compares favorably
2014 levels. That level of investment, coupled with our ongoing
to a 71 percent total five-year return for the Edison Electric Institute
implementation of best practices and procedures, is driving our
Index and an 81 percent total return for the S&P 500.
performance steadily higher within the top quartile of our industry.
We are achieving these returns while at the same time effectively
This performance was particularly impressive during arguably one of
managing our financial and operating risks. In April, Standard and
the worst winters in history. Record-breaking snowstorm after
Poor's Ratings Services raised its corporate credit rating for the
snowstorm in early 2015 battered Boston, Cape Cod and the island
Eversource family of companies to “A” with a stable outlook, the top
of Martha’s Vineyard, as well as parts of Connecticut and New
rating among our electric utility peers. Also in 2015, Moody’s
Hampshire. Our dedicated team of employees and “one company”
Investor Services and Fitch Ratings raised the outlook on multiple
coordination across all three states served to create an exceptional
Eversource operating subsidiaries to “positive” from “stable.” Strong
storm response.
It is during these cold winters when the serious energy challenges
weather. Further, we have estimated the additional 1,090 MW of
facing New England are most apparent. Natural gas is the fuel of
base load power Northern Pass will bring to the region would save
choice for heating and power production and non-gas-fired power
New England customers more than $800 million per year. Customers
plants continue to retire, yet no major additions to our region’s
need and deserve this price stability. Moreover, Northern Pass alone
natural gas transmission infrastructure have occurred in at least
is expected to lower carbon emissions in New England by at least 3
20 years. We cannot continue to endure winter gas delivery
million tons annually—that’s the equivalent of taking more than
constraints, which produce volatile energy markets and the potential
600,000 cars off the road.
for skyrocketing prices like we have experienced in many
recent winters.
In addition to Northern Pass, we continue to invest heavily in electric
transmission projects that maintain the reliability of the region’s
Eversource understands the region’s dilemma and has taken the lead
electric grid. The Interstate Reliability Project (IRP) was completed
in addressing it. Two of our projects, Access Northeast and Northern
in 2015, successfully capping off nearly a decade of planning, siting
Pass, will provide New England customers with significant relief by
and construction of the New England East-West Solution
expanding pipeline capacity, importing clean hydro power and
(NEEWS)—a suite of regional projects designed to strengthen the
creating long-term cost savings. I am pleased to report both
reliability of the regional power grid by improving efficiency and
projects gained solid ground in 2015. Access Northeast has begun
eliminating congestion. The investment by Eversource alone in
the federal regulatory approval process. It has also signed long-term
NEEWS was approximately $1 billion.
gas supply contracts with electric distribution companies that are
now being reviewed by regulators.
NEEWS projects represent the largest upgrade to the regional
transmission system in a number of years, supporting the region's
Northern Pass revised its 192-mile route, adding 52 miles of
economic growth and environmental goals through greater access
underground construction in scenic areas, commenced the state
to newer, more efficient, and cleaner generating plants. In 2015, we
regulatory review process, received a favorable draft environmental
commenced siting filings and construction on our next two major
impact statement from the U.S. Department of Energy, and released
transmission initiatives, the Greater Boston and Greater Hartford sets
its new Forward NH Plan that underscores the billions of dollars in
of reliability projects. Altogether, we expect to invest approximately
project benefits to the state of New Hampshire.
$900 million in these initiatives by 2019.
These projects will both provide significant economic and
We are also investing heavily in our natural gas delivery
environmental benefits to New England, lowering our dependence
infrastructure—$213 million in 2015 and nearly $1.3 billion
on older, higher emitting oil and coal-fired generation. Once Access
projected from 2016 through 2019. That investment involves a
Northeast is in service, we have estimated New Englanders could
combination of upgrading existing distribution mains and LNG
save $1.5 to $2 billion annually in energy costs during normal winter
storage facilities, and meeting the increasing demand in our
communities for natural gas heat. In 2015, a record 11,415
service, the cost of energy and our role in overall energy prices. What
Eversource customers in Connecticut and Massachusetts installed
we learned was clear: customers know who Eversource is, and feel
natural gas space heating in their homes and businesses, and we
we are doing a great job in reliably delivering their energy.
expect that figure to climb to 12,500 in 2016.
We also learned that wide fluctuations in energy prices negatively
Energy efficiency investments and customer programs continue to
impact customers’ satisfaction with Eversource. Most customers do
be critical to our company’s long-term success. We invested $500
not understand the current market dynamics, the effect of those
million last year alone in efficiency programs that truly benefit our
dynamics on their bills, or the important work Eversource is doing to
customers. And the measures we have helped install for customers
resolve the region’s energy dilemma.
will save 11 billion kWh of electricity and 130 million therms of
natural gas over their lifetime, as well as eliminate the emission of 5
million tons of carbon. Those savings represent enough electricity to
power 1.3 million homes for a year and enough natural gas to heat
140,000 New England homes for a year.
Taking this research into consideration, we are now changing the
conversation with customers, while also aiming to drive customer
satisfaction improvements. It’s a new and exciting approach to
customer communication and education, using a combination of
advertising, interactive online experiences, call center scripting, a
Investments in our community also are a large component of how
new bill, and social media. We are helping them understand why
we deliver great service to customers. We have two clear priorities:
energy prices go up and down and what steps they can take to
focusing on health and well-being of youth in our service territory,
reduce their costs. We believe this initiative will improve customer
and making sure that our giving has a wide impact. As the largest
satisfaction scores, which in turn helps drive the overall success of
energy provider in the region, we want to reach as many of our
the company.
fellow New Englanders as possible. In 2015, Eversource’s
philanthropy totaled approximately $5 million, through direct
program grants, partnerships like the Eversource Hartford Marathon,
the Eversource Walk for Boston Children’s Hospital, or Special
Olympics, and employee volunteerism and giving programs like our
United Way Campaign.
Looking ahead to 2016, our focus on the customer in all that we do
also means helping them understand how we are working diligently
to change the energy landscape in the region. Last year, Eversource
conducted comprehensive customer research, asking customers
about their perceptions of the company, including our delivery of
We are firmly in the driver’s seat when it comes to energy delivery in
New England. We are the region’s premier gas and electric provider,
but more than that, we are an advocate for our customers, with
strong leadership and solutions to pricing and supply challenges.
Eversource has an exciting future ahead as our company continues
to thrive and grow.
Shareholder Letter
By remaining faithful to our core mission to safely deliver reliable
energy and superior customer service, Eversource has been able to
consistently provide significant value to our customers, communities
and shareholders.
We have been thoughtful and innovative when it comes to meeting
our customers’ evolving needs, delivering top-quartile reliability and
addressing New England’s energy challenges. Our approach of
smart system investments, customer service excellence and
conservative financial management has enhanced our customer
service, provided strong leadership in the industry, and delivered a
very attractive level of earnings and dividend growth.
In 2015, we reported recurring earnings of $2.81 per share,
compared with recurring earnings of $2.65 in 2014, an increase of
six percent driven largely by higher retail electric and transmission
revenue, and effective cost discipline. That growth is consistent with
our longer term projected annual earnings per share growth rate of
five to seven percent, which is one of the most attractive growth
rates in the electric utility industry.
Our earnings growth also supports solid dividend growth for our
shareholders. In 2015, we raised our common dividend by 6.4
percent to an annualized rate of $1.67 per share, and in February
2016 we announced a 6.6 percent increase in the common dividend
to an annualized rate of $1.78 per share.
credit ratings lower interest costs, benefiting both customers and
shareholders.
Our strong financial performance has been a direct result of our
outstanding operating performance, highlighted by our best year
ever for electric reliability. Since 2011, Eversource’s frequency of
electric service interruptions, and the amount of time it takes to
restore customers’ power when outages occur, have both decreased
by about 40 percent. We have established an improved
enterprise-wide organizational model for our operations team, and
have successfully implemented a state-of-the-art electric
distribution management platform. This platform automates the
control and operation of our grid using self-healing technology,
enhances customer communication, and enables a consistent
customer experience across all three states. We continue to invest
Strong earnings and dividend growth have benefited our share price.
heavily in our electric distribution system, with capital expenditures
Over the past five years, Eversource has provided a cumulative total
totaling a record $783 million in 2015, up nearly 8 percent from
return to our shareholders of 89 percent, which compares favorably
2014 levels. That level of investment, coupled with our ongoing
to a 71 percent total five-year return for the Edison Electric Institute
implementation of best practices and procedures, is driving our
Index and an 81 percent total return for the S&P 500.
performance steadily higher within the top quartile of our industry.
We are achieving these returns while at the same time effectively
This performance was particularly impressive during arguably one of
managing our financial and operating risks. In April, Standard and
the worst winters in history. Record-breaking snowstorm after
Poor's Ratings Services raised its corporate credit rating for the
snowstorm in early 2015 battered Boston, Cape Cod and the island
Eversource family of companies to “A” with a stable outlook, the top
of Martha’s Vineyard, as well as parts of Connecticut and New
rating among our electric utility peers. Also in 2015, Moody’s
Hampshire. Our dedicated team of employees and “one company”
Investor Services and Fitch Ratings raised the outlook on multiple
coordination across all three states served to create an exceptional
Eversource operating subsidiaries to “positive” from “stable.” Strong
storm response.
2
It is during these cold winters when the serious energy challenges
weather. Further, we have estimated the additional 1,090 MW of
facing New England are most apparent. Natural gas is the fuel of
base load power Northern Pass will bring to the region would save
choice for heating and power production and non-gas-fired power
New England customers more than $800 million per year. Customers
plants continue to retire, yet no major additions to our region’s
need and deserve this price stability. Moreover, Northern Pass alone
natural gas transmission infrastructure have occurred in at least
is expected to lower carbon emissions in New England by at least 3
20 years. We cannot continue to endure winter gas delivery
million tons annually—that’s the equivalent of taking more than
constraints, which produce volatile energy markets and the potential
600,000 cars off the road.
for skyrocketing prices like we have experienced in many
recent winters.
In addition to Northern Pass, we continue to invest heavily in electric
transmission projects that maintain the reliability of the region’s
Eversource understands the region’s dilemma and has taken the lead
electric grid. The Interstate Reliability Project (IRP) was completed
in addressing it. Two of our projects, Access Northeast and Northern
in 2015, successfully capping off nearly a decade of planning, siting
Pass, will provide New England customers with significant relief by
and construction of the New England East-West Solution
expanding pipeline capacity, importing clean hydro power and
(NEEWS)—a suite of regional projects designed to strengthen the
creating long-term cost savings. I am pleased to report both
reliability of the regional power grid by improving efficiency and
projects gained solid ground in 2015. Access Northeast has begun
eliminating congestion. The investment by Eversource alone in
the federal regulatory approval process. It has also signed long-term
NEEWS was approximately $1 billion.
gas supply contracts with electric distribution companies that are
now being reviewed by regulators.
NEEWS projects represent the largest upgrade to the regional
transmission system in a number of years, supporting the region's
Northern Pass revised its 192-mile route, adding 52 miles of
economic growth and environmental goals through greater access
underground construction in scenic areas, commenced the state
to newer, more efficient, and cleaner generating plants. In 2015, we
regulatory review process, received a favorable draft environmental
commenced siting filings and construction on our next two major
impact statement from the U.S. Department of Energy, and released
transmission initiatives, the Greater Boston and Greater Hartford sets
its new Forward NH Plan that underscores the billions of dollars in
of reliability projects. Altogether, we expect to invest approximately
project benefits to the state of New Hampshire.
$900 million in these initiatives by 2019.
These projects will both provide significant economic and
We are also investing heavily in our natural gas delivery
environmental benefits to New England, lowering our dependence
infrastructure—$213 million in 2015 and nearly $1.3 billion
on older, higher emitting oil and coal-fired generation. Once Access
projected from 2016 through 2019. That investment involves a
Northeast is in service, we have estimated New Englanders could
combination of upgrading existing distribution mains and LNG
save $1.5 to $2 billion annually in energy costs during normal winter
storage facilities, and meeting the increasing demand in our
communities for natural gas heat. In 2015, a record 11,415
service, the cost of energy and our role in overall energy prices. What
Eversource customers in Connecticut and Massachusetts installed
we learned was clear: customers know who Eversource is, and feel
natural gas space heating in their homes and businesses, and we
we are doing a great job in reliably delivering their energy.
expect that figure to climb to 12,500 in 2016.
We also learned that wide fluctuations in energy prices negatively
Energy efficiency investments and customer programs continue to
impact customers’ satisfaction with Eversource. Most customers do
be critical to our company’s long-term success. We invested $500
not understand the current market dynamics, the effect of those
million last year alone in efficiency programs that truly benefit our
dynamics on their bills, or the important work Eversource is doing to
customers. And the measures we have helped install for customers
resolve the region’s energy dilemma.
will save 11 billion kWh of electricity and 130 million therms of
natural gas over their lifetime, as well as eliminate the emission of 5
million tons of carbon. Those savings represent enough electricity to
power 1.3 million homes for a year and enough natural gas to heat
140,000 New England homes for a year.
Taking this research into consideration, we are now changing the
conversation with customers, while also aiming to drive customer
satisfaction improvements. It’s a new and exciting approach to
customer communication and education, using a combination of
advertising, interactive online experiences, call center scripting, a
Investments in our community also are a large component of how
new bill, and social media. We are helping them understand why
we deliver great service to customers. We have two clear priorities:
energy prices go up and down and what steps they can take to
focusing on health and well-being of youth in our service territory,
reduce their costs. We believe this initiative will improve customer
and making sure that our giving has a wide impact. As the largest
satisfaction scores, which in turn helps drive the overall success of
energy provider in the region, we want to reach as many of our
the company.
fellow New Englanders as possible. In 2015, Eversource’s
philanthropy totaled approximately $5 million, through direct
program grants, partnerships like the Eversource Hartford Marathon,
the Eversource Walk for Boston Children’s Hospital, or Special
Olympics, and employee volunteerism and giving programs like our
United Way Campaign.
Looking ahead to 2016, our focus on the customer in all that we do
also means helping them understand how we are working diligently
to change the energy landscape in the region. Last year, Eversource
conducted comprehensive customer research, asking customers
about their perceptions of the company, including our delivery of
We are firmly in the driver’s seat when it comes to energy delivery in
New England. We are the region’s premier gas and electric provider,
but more than that, we are an advocate for our customers, with
strong leadership and solutions to pricing and supply challenges.
Eversource has an exciting future ahead as our company continues
to thrive and grow.
By remaining faithful to our core mission to safely deliver reliable
energy and superior customer service, Eversource has been able to
consistently provide significant value to our customers, communities
and shareholders.
We have been thoughtful and innovative when it comes to meeting
our customers’ evolving needs, delivering top-quartile reliability and
addressing New England’s energy challenges. Our approach of
smart system investments, customer service excellence and
conservative financial management has enhanced our customer
service, provided strong leadership in the industry, and delivered a
very attractive level of earnings and dividend growth.
In 2015, we reported recurring earnings of $2.81 per share,
compared with recurring earnings of $2.65 in 2014, an increase of
six percent driven largely by higher retail electric and transmission
revenue, and effective cost discipline. That growth is consistent with
our longer term projected annual earnings per share growth rate of
five to seven percent, which is one of the most attractive growth
rates in the electric utility industry.
Our earnings growth also supports solid dividend growth for our
shareholders. In 2015, we raised our common dividend by 6.4
percent to an annualized rate of $1.67 per share, and in February
2016 we announced a 6.6 percent increase in the common dividend
to an annualized rate of $1.78 per share.
credit ratings lower interest costs, benefiting both customers and
shareholders.
Our strong financial performance has been a direct result of our
outstanding operating performance, highlighted by our best year
ever for electric reliability. Since 2011, Eversource’s frequency of
electric service interruptions, and the amount of time it takes to
restore customers’ power when outages occur, have both decreased
by about 40 percent. We have established an improved
enterprise-wide organizational model for our operations team, and
have successfully implemented a state-of-the-art electric
distribution management platform. This platform automates the
control and operation of our grid using self-healing technology,
enhances customer communication, and enables a consistent
customer experience across all three states. We continue to invest
Strong earnings and dividend growth have benefited our share price.
heavily in our electric distribution system, with capital expenditures
Over the past five years, Eversource has provided a cumulative total
totaling a record $783 million in 2015, up nearly 8 percent from
return to our shareholders of 89 percent, which compares favorably
2014 levels. That level of investment, coupled with our ongoing
to a 71 percent total five-year return for the Edison Electric Institute
implementation of best practices and procedures, is driving our
Index and an 81 percent total return for the S&P 500.
performance steadily higher within the top quartile of our industry.
We are achieving these returns while at the same time effectively
This performance was particularly impressive during arguably one of
managing our financial and operating risks. In April, Standard and
the worst winters in history. Record-breaking snowstorm after
Poor's Ratings Services raised its corporate credit rating for the
snowstorm in early 2015 battered Boston, Cape Cod and the island
Eversource family of companies to “A” with a stable outlook, the top
of Martha’s Vineyard, as well as parts of Connecticut and New
rating among our electric utility peers. Also in 2015, Moody’s
Hampshire. Our dedicated team of employees and “one company”
Investor Services and Fitch Ratings raised the outlook on multiple
coordination across all three states served to create an exceptional
Eversource operating subsidiaries to “positive” from “stable.” Strong
storm response.
It is during these cold winters when the serious energy challenges
weather. Further, we have estimated the additional 1,090 MW of
facing New England are most apparent. Natural gas is the fuel of
base load power Northern Pass will bring to the region would save
choice for heating and power production and non-gas-fired power
New England customers more than $800 million per year. Customers
plants continue to retire, yet no major additions to our region’s
need and deserve this price stability. Moreover, Northern Pass alone
natural gas transmission infrastructure have occurred in at least
is expected to lower carbon emissions in New England by at least 3
20 years. We cannot continue to endure winter gas delivery
million tons annually—that’s the equivalent of taking more than
constraints, which produce volatile energy markets and the potential
600,000 cars off the road.
for skyrocketing prices like we have experienced in many
recent winters.
In addition to Northern Pass, we continue to invest heavily in electric
transmission projects that maintain the reliability of the region’s
Eversource understands the region’s dilemma and has taken the lead
electric grid. The Interstate Reliability Project (IRP) was completed
in addressing it. Two of our projects, Access Northeast and Northern
in 2015, successfully capping off nearly a decade of planning, siting
Pass, will provide New England customers with significant relief by
and construction of the New England East-West Solution
expanding pipeline capacity, importing clean hydro power and
(NEEWS)—a suite of regional projects designed to strengthen the
creating long-term cost savings. I am pleased to report both
reliability of the regional power grid by improving efficiency and
projects gained solid ground in 2015. Access Northeast has begun
eliminating congestion. The investment by Eversource alone in
the federal regulatory approval process. It has also signed long-term
NEEWS was approximately $1 billion.
gas supply contracts with electric distribution companies that are
now being reviewed by regulators.
NEEWS projects represent the largest upgrade to the regional
transmission system in a number of years, supporting the region's
Northern Pass revised its 192-mile route, adding 52 miles of
economic growth and environmental goals through greater access
underground construction in scenic areas, commenced the state
to newer, more efficient, and cleaner generating plants. In 2015, we
regulatory review process, received a favorable draft environmental
commenced siting filings and construction on our next two major
impact statement from the U.S. Department of Energy, and released
transmission initiatives, the Greater Boston and Greater Hartford sets
its new Forward NH Plan that underscores the billions of dollars in
of reliability projects. Altogether, we expect to invest approximately
project benefits to the state of New Hampshire.
$900 million in these initiatives by 2019.
These projects will both provide significant economic and
We are also investing heavily in our natural gas delivery
environmental benefits to New England, lowering our dependence
infrastructure—$213 million in 2015 and nearly $1.3 billion
on older, higher emitting oil and coal-fired generation. Once Access
projected from 2016 through 2019. That investment involves a
Northeast is in service, we have estimated New Englanders could
combination of upgrading existing distribution mains and LNG
save $1.5 to $2 billion annually in energy costs during normal winter
storage facilities, and meeting the increasing demand in our
3
communities for natural gas heat. In 2015, a record 11,415
service, the cost of energy and our role in overall energy prices. What
Eversource customers in Connecticut and Massachusetts installed
we learned was clear: customers know who Eversource is, and feel
natural gas space heating in their homes and businesses, and we
we are doing a great job in reliably delivering their energy.
expect that figure to climb to 12,500 in 2016.
We also learned that wide fluctuations in energy prices negatively
Energy efficiency investments and customer programs continue to
impact customers’ satisfaction with Eversource. Most customers do
be critical to our company’s long-term success. We invested $500
not understand the current market dynamics, the effect of those
million last year alone in efficiency programs that truly benefit our
dynamics on their bills, or the important work Eversource is doing to
customers. And the measures we have helped install for customers
resolve the region’s energy dilemma.
will save 11 billion kWh of electricity and 130 million therms of
natural gas over their lifetime, as well as eliminate the emission of 5
million tons of carbon. Those savings represent enough electricity to
power 1.3 million homes for a year and enough natural gas to heat
140,000 New England homes for a year.
Taking this research into consideration, we are now changing the
conversation with customers, while also aiming to drive customer
satisfaction improvements. It’s a new and exciting approach to
customer communication and education, using a combination of
advertising, interactive online experiences, call center scripting, a
Investments in our community also are a large component of how
new bill, and social media. We are helping them understand why
we deliver great service to customers. We have two clear priorities:
energy prices go up and down and what steps they can take to
focusing on health and well-being of youth in our service territory,
reduce their costs. We believe this initiative will improve customer
and making sure that our giving has a wide impact. As the largest
satisfaction scores, which in turn helps drive the overall success of
energy provider in the region, we want to reach as many of our
the company.
fellow New Englanders as possible. In 2015, Eversource’s
philanthropy totaled approximately $5 million, through direct
program grants, partnerships like the Eversource Hartford Marathon,
the Eversource Walk for Boston Children’s Hospital, or Special
Olympics, and employee volunteerism and giving programs like our
United Way Campaign.
Looking ahead to 2016, our focus on the customer in all that we do
also means helping them understand how we are working diligently
to change the energy landscape in the region. Last year, Eversource
conducted comprehensive customer research, asking customers
about their perceptions of the company, including our delivery of
We are firmly in the driver’s seat when it comes to energy delivery in
New England. We are the region’s premier gas and electric provider,
but more than that, we are an advocate for our customers, with
strong leadership and solutions to pricing and supply challenges.
Eversource has an exciting future ahead as our company continues
to thrive and grow.
By remaining faithful to our core mission to safely deliver reliable
energy and superior customer service, Eversource has been able to
consistently provide significant value to our customers, communities
and shareholders.
We have been thoughtful and innovative when it comes to meeting
our customers’ evolving needs, delivering top-quartile reliability and
addressing New England’s energy challenges. Our approach of
smart system investments, customer service excellence and
conservative financial management has enhanced our customer
service, provided strong leadership in the industry, and delivered a
very attractive level of earnings and dividend growth.
In 2015, we reported recurring earnings of $2.81 per share,
compared with recurring earnings of $2.65 in 2014, an increase of
six percent driven largely by higher retail electric and transmission
revenue, and effective cost discipline. That growth is consistent with
our longer term projected annual earnings per share growth rate of
five to seven percent, which is one of the most attractive growth
rates in the electric utility industry.
Our earnings growth also supports solid dividend growth for our
shareholders. In 2015, we raised our common dividend by 6.4
percent to an annualized rate of $1.67 per share, and in February
2016 we announced a 6.6 percent increase in the common dividend
to an annualized rate of $1.78 per share.
credit ratings lower interest costs, benefiting both customers and
shareholders.
Our strong financial performance has been a direct result of our
outstanding operating performance, highlighted by our best year
ever for electric reliability. Since 2011, Eversource’s frequency of
electric service interruptions, and the amount of time it takes to
restore customers’ power when outages occur, have both decreased
by about 40 percent. We have established an improved
enterprise-wide organizational model for our operations team, and
have successfully implemented a state-of-the-art electric
distribution management platform. This platform automates the
control and operation of our grid using self-healing technology,
enhances customer communication, and enables a consistent
customer experience across all three states. We continue to invest
Strong earnings and dividend growth have benefited our share price.
heavily in our electric distribution system, with capital expenditures
Over the past five years, Eversource has provided a cumulative total
totaling a record $783 million in 2015, up nearly 8 percent from
return to our shareholders of 89 percent, which compares favorably
2014 levels. That level of investment, coupled with our ongoing
to a 71 percent total five-year return for the Edison Electric Institute
implementation of best practices and procedures, is driving our
Index and an 81 percent total return for the S&P 500.
performance steadily higher within the top quartile of our industry.
We are achieving these returns while at the same time effectively
This performance was particularly impressive during arguably one of
managing our financial and operating risks. In April, Standard and
the worst winters in history. Record-breaking snowstorm after
Poor's Ratings Services raised its corporate credit rating for the
snowstorm in early 2015 battered Boston, Cape Cod and the island
Eversource family of companies to “A” with a stable outlook, the top
of Martha’s Vineyard, as well as parts of Connecticut and New
rating among our electric utility peers. Also in 2015, Moody’s
Hampshire. Our dedicated team of employees and “one company”
Investor Services and Fitch Ratings raised the outlook on multiple
coordination across all three states served to create an exceptional
Eversource operating subsidiaries to “positive” from “stable.” Strong
storm response.
It is during these cold winters when the serious energy challenges
weather. Further, we have estimated the additional 1,090 MW of
facing New England are most apparent. Natural gas is the fuel of
base load power Northern Pass will bring to the region would save
choice for heating and power production and non-gas-fired power
New England customers more than $800 million per year. Customers
plants continue to retire, yet no major additions to our region’s
need and deserve this price stability. Moreover, Northern Pass alone
natural gas transmission infrastructure have occurred in at least
is expected to lower carbon emissions in New England by at least 3
20 years. We cannot continue to endure winter gas delivery
million tons annually—that’s the equivalent of taking more than
constraints, which produce volatile energy markets and the potential
600,000 cars off the road.
for skyrocketing prices like we have experienced in many
recent winters.
In addition to Northern Pass, we continue to invest heavily in electric
transmission projects that maintain the reliability of the region’s
Eversource understands the region’s dilemma and has taken the lead
electric grid. The Interstate Reliability Project (IRP) was completed
in addressing it. Two of our projects, Access Northeast and Northern
in 2015, successfully capping off nearly a decade of planning, siting
Pass, will provide New England customers with significant relief by
and construction of the New England East-West Solution
expanding pipeline capacity, importing clean hydro power and
(NEEWS)—a suite of regional projects designed to strengthen the
creating long-term cost savings. I am pleased to report both
reliability of the regional power grid by improving efficiency and
projects gained solid ground in 2015. Access Northeast has begun
eliminating congestion. The investment by Eversource alone in
the federal regulatory approval process. It has also signed long-term
NEEWS was approximately $1 billion.
gas supply contracts with electric distribution companies that are
now being reviewed by regulators.
NEEWS projects represent the largest upgrade to the regional
transmission system in a number of years, supporting the region's
Northern Pass revised its 192-mile route, adding 52 miles of
economic growth and environmental goals through greater access
underground construction in scenic areas, commenced the state
to newer, more efficient, and cleaner generating plants. In 2015, we
regulatory review process, received a favorable draft environmental
commenced siting filings and construction on our next two major
impact statement from the U.S. Department of Energy, and released
transmission initiatives, the Greater Boston and Greater Hartford sets
its new Forward NH Plan that underscores the billions of dollars in
of reliability projects. Altogether, we expect to invest approximately
project benefits to the state of New Hampshire.
$900 million in these initiatives by 2019.
These projects will both provide significant economic and
We are also investing heavily in our natural gas delivery
environmental benefits to New England, lowering our dependence
infrastructure—$213 million in 2015 and nearly $1.3 billion
on older, higher emitting oil and coal-fired generation. Once Access
projected from 2016 through 2019. That investment involves a
Northeast is in service, we have estimated New Englanders could
combination of upgrading existing distribution mains and LNG
save $1.5 to $2 billion annually in energy costs during normal winter
storage facilities, and meeting the increasing demand in our
communities for natural gas heat. In 2015, a record 11,415
service, the cost of energy and our role in overall energy prices. What
Eversource customers in Connecticut and Massachusetts installed
we learned was clear: customers know who Eversource is, and feel
natural gas space heating in their homes and businesses, and we
we are doing a great job in reliably delivering their energy.
expect that figure to climb to 12,500 in 2016.
We also learned that wide fluctuations in energy prices negatively
Energy efficiency investments and customer programs continue to
impact customers’ satisfaction with Eversource. Most customers do
be critical to our company’s long-term success. We invested $500
not understand the current market dynamics, the effect of those
million last year alone in efficiency programs that truly benefit our
dynamics on their bills, or the important work Eversource is doing to
customers. And the measures we have helped install for customers
resolve the region’s energy dilemma.
will save 11 billion kWh of electricity and 130 million therms of
natural gas over their lifetime, as well as eliminate the emission of 5
million tons of carbon. Those savings represent enough electricity to
power 1.3 million homes for a year and enough natural gas to heat
140,000 New England homes for a year.
Taking this research into consideration, we are now changing the
conversation with customers, while also aiming to drive customer
satisfaction improvements. It’s a new and exciting approach to
customer communication and education, using a combination of
advertising, interactive online experiences, call center scripting, a
Investments in our community also are a large component of how
new bill, and social media. We are helping them understand why
we deliver great service to customers. We have two clear priorities:
energy prices go up and down and what steps they can take to
focusing on health and well-being of youth in our service territory,
reduce their costs. We believe this initiative will improve customer
and making sure that our giving has a wide impact. As the largest
satisfaction scores, which in turn helps drive the overall success of
energy provider in the region, we want to reach as many of our
the company.
We are firmly in the driver’s seat when it comes to energy delivery in
New England. We are the region’s premier gas and electric provider,
but more than that, we are an advocate for our customers, with
strong leadership and solutions to pricing and supply challenges.
Eversource has an exciting future ahead as our company continues
to thrive and grow.
fellow New Englanders as possible. In 2015, Eversource’s
philanthropy totaled approximately $5 million, through direct
program grants, partnerships like the Eversource Hartford Marathon,
the Eversource Walk for Boston Children’s Hospital, or Special
Olympics, and employee volunteerism and giving programs like our
United Way Campaign.
Looking ahead to 2016, our focus on the customer in all that we do
also means helping them understand how we are working diligently
to change the energy landscape in the region. Last year, Eversource
conducted comprehensive customer research, asking customers
about their perceptions of the company, including our delivery of
4
Commission
File Number
1-5324
0-00404
1-02301
1-6392
0-7624
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2015
or
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ____________ to ____________
Registrant; State of Incorporation;
Address; and Telephone Number
EVERSOURCE ENERGY
(a Massachusetts voluntary association)
300 Cadwell Drive
Springfield, Massachusetts 01104
Telephone: (413) 785-5871
THE CONNECTICUT LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY
(a Connecticut corporation)
107 Selden Street
Berlin, Connecticut 06037-1616
Telephone: (860) 665-5000
NSTAR ELECTRIC COMPANY
(a Massachusetts corporation)
800 Boylston Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02199
Telephone: (617) 424-2000
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
(a New Hampshire corporation)
Energy Park
780 North Commercial Street
Manchester, New Hampshire 03101-1134
Telephone: (603) 669-4000
WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC COMPANY
(a Massachusetts corporation)
300 Cadwell Drive
Springfield, Massachusetts 01104
Telephone: (413) 785-5871
I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.
04-2147929
06-0303850
04-1278810
02-0181050
04-1961130
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Registrant
Eversource Energy
Title of Each Class
Name of Each Exchange
on Which Registered
Common Shares, $5.00 par value
New York Stock Exchange, Inc.
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Registrant
Title of Each Class
The Connecticut Light and Power Company
Preferred Stock, par value $50.00 per share, issuable in series, of which the following series are
outstanding:
$1.90
$2.00
$2.04
$2.20
3.90%
$2.06
$2.09
4.50%
4.96%
4.50%
5.28%
$3.24
6.56%
Series
Series
Series
Series
Series
Series E
Series F
Series
Series
Series
Series
Series G
Series
of 1947
of 1947
of 1949
of 1949
of 1949
of 1954
of 1955
of 1956
of 1958
of 1963
of 1967
of 1968
of 1968
NSTAR Electric Company
Preferred Stock, par value $100.00 per share, issuable in series, of which the following series are
outstanding:
4.25%
4.78%
Series
Series
NSTAR Electric Company, Public Service Company of New Hampshire and Western Massachusetts Electric Company each meet the conditions set
forth in General Instruction I(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K and each is therefore filing this Form 10-K with the reduced disclosure format specified in
General Instruction I(2) to Form 10-K.
Indicate by check mark if the registrants are well-known seasoned issuers, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes
No
Indicate by check mark if the registrants are not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants have submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web sites, if any, every Interactive Data File
required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes
No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to
the best of the registrants’ knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of
“accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
Accelerated Filer
Accelerated
Filer
Non-accelerated
Filer
Eversource Energy
The Connecticut Light and Power Company
NSTAR Electric Company
Public Service Company of New Hampshire
Western Massachusetts Electric Company
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants are shell companies (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act):
Eversource Energy
The Connecticut Light and Power Company
NSTAR Electric Company
Public Service Company of New Hampshire
Western Massachusetts Electric Company
Yes
No
The aggregate market value of Eversource Energy’s Common Shares, $5.00 par value, held by non-affiliates, computed by reference to the price at
which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of Eversource
Energy’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter (June 30, 2015) was $14,345,789,335 based on a closing market price of $45.41 per share for
the 315,916,964 common shares outstanding on June 30, 2015.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers’ classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:
Company - Class of Stock
Eversource Energy
Common shares, $5.00 par value
The Connecticut Light and Power Company
Common stock, $10.00 par value
NSTAR Electric Company
Common Stock, $1.00 par value
Public Service Company of New Hampshire
Common stock, $1.00 par value
Western Massachusetts Electric Company
Common stock, $25.00 par value
Outstanding as of January 31, 2016
317,191,249 shares
6,035,205 shares
100 shares
301 shares
434,653 shares
Eversource Energy holds all of the 6,035,205 shares, 100 shares, 301 shares, and 434,653 shares of the outstanding common stock of The
Connecticut Light and Power Company, NSTAR Electric Company, Public Service Company of New Hampshire and Western Massachusetts
Electric Company, respectively.
Eversource Energy, The Connecticut Light and Power Company, NSTAR Electric Company, Public Service Company of New Hampshire, and
Western Massachusetts Electric Company each separately file this combined Form 10-K. Information contained herein relating to any individual
registrant is filed by such registrant on its own behalf. Each registrant makes no representation as to information relating to the other registrants.
The following is a glossary of abbreviations or acronyms that are found in this report:
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Current or former Eversource Energy companies, segments or investments:
Eversource, ES or the Company
Eversource parent or ES parent
ES parent and other companies
Eversource Energy and subsidiaries
Eversource Energy, a public utility holding company
ES parent and other companies are comprised of Eversource parent, Eversource Service and other
subsidiaries, which primarily includes our unregulated businesses, HWP Company, The Rocky River Realty
Company (a real estate subsidiary), and the consolidated operations of CYAPC and YAEC
The Connecticut Light and Power Company
NSTAR Electric Company
Public Service Company of New Hampshire
Western Massachusetts Electric Company
NSTAR Gas Company
Yankee Gas Services Company
Northern Pass Transmission LLC
Eversource Energy Service Company (effective January 1, 2014 includes the operations of NSTAR
Electric & Gas)
NSTAR Electric & Gas Corporation, a former Eversource Energy service company (effective January 1,
2014 merged into Eversource Energy Service Company)
Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company
Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company
Yankee Atomic Electric Company
CYAPC, YAEC and MYAPC
The Eversource Regulated companies are comprised of the electric distribution and transmission businesses
of CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH, and WMECO, the natural gas distribution businesses of Yankee Gas and
NSTAR Gas, the generation activities of PSNH and WMECO, and NPT
Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection
U.S. Department of Energy
Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources
Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
ISO New England, Inc., the New England Independent System Operator
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission
Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
CL&P
NSTAR Electric
PSNH
WMECO
NSTAR Gas
Yankee Gas
NPT
Eversource Service
NSTAR Electric & Gas
CYAPC
MYAPC
YAEC
Yankee Companies
Regulated companies
Regulators:
DEEP
DOE
DOER
DPU
EPA
FERC
ISO-NE
MA DEP
NHPUC
PURA
SEC
SJC
Other Terms and Abbreviations:
AFUDC
AOCI
ARO
C&LM
CfD
Clean Air Project
CO2
CPSL
CTA
CWIP
EPS
ERISA
ES 2014 Form 10-K
ESOP
ESPP
FERC ALJ
Fitch
FMCC
FTR
GAAP
GSC
GSRP
Allowance For Funds Used During Construction
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss)
Asset Retirement Obligation
Conservation and Load Management
Contract for Differences
The construction of a wet flue gas desulphurization system, known as “scrubber technology,” to reduce
mercury emissions of the Merrimack coal-fired generation station in Bow, New Hampshire
Carbon dioxide
Capital Projects Scheduling List
Competitive Transition Assessment
Construction Work in Progress
Earnings Per Share
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
The Eversource Energy and Subsidiaries 2014 combined Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC
Employee Stock Ownership Plan
Employee Share Purchase Plan
FERC Administrative Law Judge
Fitch Ratings
Federally Mandated Congestion Charge
Financial Transmission Rights
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
Generation Service Charge
Greater Springfield Reliability Project
i
GWh
HQ
HVDC
Hydro Renewable Energy
IPP
ISO-NE Tariff
kV
kVa
kW
kWh
LBR
LNG
LRS
MGP
MMBtu
Moody’s
MW
MWh
NEEWS
Northern Pass
NOx
PAM
PBOP
PBOP Plan
PCRBs
Pension Plan
PPA
RECs
Regulatory ROE
ROE
RRB
RSUs
S&P
SBC
SCRC
SERP
SIP
SO2
SS
TCAM
TSA
UI
Gigawatt-Hours
Hydro-Québec, a corporation wholly owned by the Québec government, including its divisions that produce,
transmit and distribute electricity in Québec, Canada
High voltage direct current
Hydro Renewable Energy, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Hydro-Québec
Independent Power Producers
ISO-NE FERC Transmission, Markets and Services Tariff
Kilovolt
Kilovolt-ampere
Kilowatt (equal to one thousand watts)
Kilowatt-Hours (the basic unit of electricity energy equal to one kilowatt of power supplied for one hour)
Lost Base Revenue
Liquefied natural gas
Supplier of last resort service
Manufactured Gas Plant
One million British thermal units
Moody’s Investors Services, Inc.
Megawatt
Megawatt-Hours
New England East-West Solution
The high voltage direct current transmission line project from Canada into New Hampshire
Nitrogen oxides
Pension and PBOP Rate Adjustment Mechanism
Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pension
Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pension Plan that provides certain retiree benefits, primarily medical,
dental and life insurance
Pollution Control Revenue Bonds
Single uniform noncontributory defined benefit retirement plan
Pension Protection Act
Renewable Energy Certificates
The average cost of capital method for calculating the return on equity related to the distribution and
generation business segment excluding the wholesale transmission segment
Return on Equity
Rate Reduction Bond or Rate Reduction Certificate
Restricted share units
Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC
Systems Benefits Charge
Stranded Cost Recovery Charge
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans and non-qualified defined benefit retirement plans
Simplified Incentive Plan
Sulfur dioxide
Standard service
Transmission Cost Adjustment Mechanism
Transmission Service Agreement
The United Illuminating Company
ii
EVERSOURCE ENERGY AND SUBSIDIARIES
THE CONNECTICUT LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY
NSTAR ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE AND SUBSIDIARY
WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC COMPANY
2015 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Item 1.
Business
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
Properties
Legal Proceedings
Mine Safety Disclosures
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
PART I
PART II
Market for the Registrants’ Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Selected Consolidated Financial Data
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Item 8.
Item 9.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures
Item 9B.
Other Information
Item 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Item 11.
Executive Compensation
PART III
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Item 15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Signatures
PART IV
iii
Page
2
16
19
19
21
22
24
26
28
50
51
103
103
103
104
104
104
105
105
106
107
EVERSOURCE ENERGY AND SUBSIDIARIES
THE CONNECTICUT LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY
NSTAR ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE AND SUBSIDIARY
WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC COMPANY
SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES
LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
References in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to “Eversource,” “the Company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refer to Eversource and its consolidated
subsidiaries. On April 30, 2015, the Company’s legal name was changed from Northeast Utilities to Eversource Energy. CL&P, NSTAR Electric,
PSNH and WMECO are each doing business as Eversource Energy.
From time to time we make statements concerning our expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, strategies, assumptions of future events, future
financial performance or growth and other statements that are not historical facts. These statements are “forward-looking statements” within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You can generally identify our forward-looking statements through the use of
words or phrases such as “estimate,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “project,” “believe,” “forecast,” “should,” “could,” and other similar
expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on the current expectations, estimates, assumptions or projections of management and are not
guarantees of future performance. These expectations, estimates, assumptions or projections may vary materially from actual results. Accordingly,
any such statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to, and are accompanied by, the following important factors that could cause our
actual results to differ materially from those contained in our forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
cyber breaches, acts of war or terrorism, or grid disturbances,
actions or inaction of local, state and federal regulatory, public policy and taxing bodies,
changes in business conditions, which could include disruptive technology related to our current or future business model,
changes in economic conditions, including impact on interest rates, tax policies, and customer demand and payment ability,
fluctuations in weather patterns,
changes in laws, regulations or regulatory policy,
changes in levels or timing of capital expenditures,
disruptions in the capital markets or other events that make our access to necessary capital more difficult or costly,
developments in legal or public policy doctrines,
technological developments,
changes in accounting standards and financial reporting regulations,
actions of rating agencies, and
other presently unknown or unforeseen factors.
Other risk factors are detailed in our reports filed with the SEC and updated as necessary, and we encourage you to consult such disclosures.
All such factors are difficult to predict, contain uncertainties that may materially affect our actual results and are beyond our control. You should not
place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements, each speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and we undertake no
obligation to update any forward-looking statement or statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made or
to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. New factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for us to predict all of such factors, nor
can we assess the impact of each such factor on the business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to
differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. For more information, see Item 1A, Risk Factors, included in this
combined Annual Report on Form 10-K. This Annual Report on Form 10-K also describes material contingencies and critical accounting policies in
the accompanying Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Combined Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements. We encourage you to review these items.
1
EVERSOURCE ENERGY AND SUBSIDIARIES
THE CONNECTICUT LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY
NSTAR ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE AND SUBSIDIARY
WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC COMPANY
PART I
Item 1.
Business
Please refer to the Glossary of Terms for definitions of defined terms and abbreviations used in this combined Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Eversource Energy, headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts and Hartford, Connecticut, is a public utility holding company subject to regulation by
the FERC under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 2005. We are engaged primarily in the energy delivery business through the following
wholly owned utility subsidiaries:
•
The Connecticut Light and Power Company (CL&P), a regulated electric utility that serves residential, commercial and industrial
customers in parts of Connecticut;
•
NSTAR Electric Company (NSTAR Electric), a regulated electric utility that serves residential, commercial and industrial customers in
parts of eastern Massachusetts;
•
Public Service Company of New Hampshire (PSNH), a regulated electric utility that serves residential, commercial and industrial
customers in parts of New Hampshire and owns generation assets used to serve customers;
•
Western Massachusetts Electric Company (WMECO), a regulated electric utility that serves residential, commercial and industrial
customers in parts of western Massachusetts and owns solar generating assets;
•
NSTAR Gas Company (NSTAR Gas), a regulated natural gas utility that serves residential, commercial and industrial customers in parts of
Massachusetts; and
•
Yankee Gas Services Company (Yankee Gas), a regulated natural gas utility that serves residential, commercial and industrial customers in
parts of Connecticut.
CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO also serve New England customers through Eversource Energy’s electric transmission business.
On April 30, 2015, the Company’s legal name was changed from Northeast Utilities to Eversource Energy. CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and
WMECO are each doing business as Eversource Energy.
Eversource Energy, CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO each report their financial results separately. We also include information in this
report on a segment basis for Eversource Energy. Eversource Energy recognizes three reportable segments: electric distribution, electric transmission
and natural gas distribution. Eversource Energy’s electric distribution segment includes the generation businesses of PSNH and WMECO. These
three segments represented substantially all of Eversource Energy’s total consolidated revenues for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.
CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO do not report separate business segments.
ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION SEGMENT
General
Eversource Energy’s electric distribution segment consists of the distribution businesses of CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO, which are
engaged in the distribution of electricity to retail customers in Connecticut, eastern Massachusetts, New Hampshire and western Massachusetts,
respectively, plus the regulated electric generation businesses of PSNH and WMECO.
The following table shows the sources of 2015 electric franchise retail revenues for Eversource Energy’s electric distribution companies, collectively,
based on categories of customers:
(Thousands of Dollars, except percentages)
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Other
Total Retail Electric Revenues
$
$
2015
3,608,155
2,476,686
326,564
151,195
6,562,600
% of Total
55
38
5
2
100%
2
A summary of our distribution companies’ retail electric GWh sales volumes and percentage changes for 2015, as compared to 2014, is as follows:
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Total
2015
2014
21,441
27,598
5,577
54,616
21,317
27,449
5,676
54,442
Percentage
Change
0.6 %
0.5 %
(1.7)%
0.3 %
Our 2015 consolidated retail electric sales volumes were slightly higher, as compared to 2014, due primarily to the impact of colder winter weather
experienced in the first quarter of 2015 and warmer weather in the third quarter of 2015, partially offset by milder winter weather in the fourth
quarter of 2015 throughout our service territories as well as an increase in customer conservation efforts, including the impact of energy efficiency
programs sponsored by CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO.
Fluctuations in retail electric sales volumes at NSTAR Electric and PSNH impact earnings. For CL&P (effective December 1, 2014) and WMECO,
fluctuations in retail electric sales volumes do not impact earnings due to their respective regulatory commission approved revenue decoupling
mechanisms. These distribution revenues are decoupled from their customer sales volumes, which breaks the relationship between sales volumes and
revenues recognized. CL&P and WMECO reconcile their annual base distribution rate recovery amounts to their respective pre-established levels of
baseline distribution delivery service revenues. Any difference between the allowed level of distribution revenue and the actual amount incurred
during a 12-month period is adjusted through rates in the following period.
ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION – CONNECTICUT
THE CONNECTICUT LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY
CL&P’s distribution business consists primarily of the purchase, delivery and sale of electricity to its residential, commercial and industrial
customers. As of December 31, 2015, CL&P furnished retail franchise electric service to approximately 1.2 million customers in 149 cities and
towns in Connecticut, covering an area of 4,400 square miles. CL&P does not own any electric generation facilities.
The following table shows the sources of CL&P’s 2015 electric franchise retail revenues based on categories of customers:
(Thousands of Dollars, except percentages)
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Other
Total Retail Electric Revenues
$
$
CL&P
2015
1,641,165
841,093
129,544
62,704
2,674,506
% of Total
61
31
5
3
100%
A summary of CL&P’s retail electric GWh sales volumes and percentage changes for 2015, as compared to 2014, is as follows:
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Total
Rates
2015
2014
10,094
9,635
2,342
22,071
10,026
9,643
2,377
22,046
Percentage
Change
0.7 %
(0.1)%
(1.5)%
0.1 %
CL&P is subject to regulation by the PURA, which, among other things, has jurisdiction over rates, certain dispositions of property and plant,
mergers and consolidations, issuances of long-term securities, standards of service and construction and operation of facilities. CL&P’s present
general rate structure consists of various rate and service classifications covering residential, commercial and industrial services. CL&P’s retail rates
include a delivery service component, which includes distribution, transmission, conservation, renewables, CTA, SBC and other charges that are
assessed on all customers. Connecticut utilities are entitled under state law to charge rates that are sufficient to allow them an opportunity to recover
their reasonable operating and capital costs, in order to attract needed capital and maintain their financial integrity, while also protecting relevant
public interests.
Under Connecticut law, all of CL&P’s customers are entitled to choose their energy suppliers, while CL&P remains their electric distribution
company. For those customers who do not choose a competitive energy supplier, under SS rates for customers with less than 500 kilowatts of
demand, and LRS rates for customers with 500 kilowatts or more of demand, CL&P purchases power under standard offer contracts and passes the
cost of the power to customers through a combined GSC and FMCC charge on customers’ bills.
CL&P continues to supply approximately 40 percent of its customer load at SS or LRS rates while the other 60 percent of its customer load has
migrated to competitive energy suppliers. Because this customer migration is only for energy supply service, it has no impact on CL&P’s electric
distribution business or its operating income.
3
The rates established by the PURA for CL&P are comprised of the following:
•
An electric generation services charge (GSC), which recovers energy-related costs incurred as a result of providing electric generation
service supply to all customers that have not migrated to competitive energy suppliers. The GSC is adjusted periodically and reconciled
semi-annually in accordance with the policies and procedures of the PURA, with any differences refunded to, or recovered from,
customers.
•
A revenue decoupling adjustment (effective December 1, 2014) that reconciles the amounts recovered from customers, on an annual basis,
to the distribution revenue requirement approved by the PURA in its last rate case, which currently is an annual amount of $1.059 billion.
•
A distribution charge, which includes a fixed customer charge and a demand and/or energy charge to collect the costs of building and
expanding the infrastructure to deliver power to customers, as well as ongoing operating costs to maintain the infrastructure.
•
A federally-mandated congestion charge (FMCC), which recovers any costs imposed by the FERC as part of the New England Standard
Market Design, including locational marginal pricing, locational installed capacity payments, and any costs approved by the PURA to
reduce these charges. The FMCC also recovers costs associated with CL&P’s system resiliency program. The FMCC is adjusted
periodically and reconciled semi-annually in accordance with the policies and procedures of the PURA, with any differences refunded to,
or recovered from, customers.
•
A transmission charge that recovers the cost of transporting electricity over high voltage lines from generating plants to substations,
including costs allocated by ISO-NE to maintain the wholesale electric market.
•
A competitive transition assessment charge (CTA), assessed to recover stranded costs associated with electric industry restructuring such as
various IPP contracts. The CTA is reconciled annually to actual costs incurred and reviewed by the PURA, with any difference refunded
to, or recovered from, customers.
•
A systems benefits charge (SBC), established to fund expenses associated with: various hardship and low income programs; a program to
compensate municipalities for losses in property tax revenue due to decreases in the value of electric generating facilities resulting directly
from electric industry restructuring. The SBC is reconciled annually to actual costs incurred and reviewed by the PURA, with any
difference refunded to, or recovered from, customers.
•
A Clean Energy Fund charge, which is used to promote investment in renewable energy sources. Amounts collected by this charge are
deposited into the Clean Energy Fund and administered by the Clean Energy Finance and Investment Authority. The Clean Energy Fund
charge is set by statute and is currently 0.1 cent per kWh.
•
A conservation charge, comprised of a statutory rate established to implement cost-effective energy conservation programs and market
transformation initiatives, plus a conservation adjustment mechanism charge to recover the residual energy efficiency spending associated
with the expanded energy efficiency costs directed by the Comprehensive Energy Strategy Plan for Connecticut.
As required by regulation, CL&P, jointly with UI, entered into the following contracts whereby UI will share 20 percent and CL&P will share 80
percent of the costs and benefits (CL&P’s portion of these costs are either recovered from, or refunded to, customers through the FMCC charge):
•
•
•
Four CfDs (totaling approximately 787 MW of capacity) with three electric generation units and one demand response project, which
extend through 2026 and have terms of up to 15 years beginning in 2009. The capacity CfDs obligate both CL&P and UI to make or
receive payments on a monthly basis to or from the project and generation owners based on the difference between a contractually set
capacity price and the capacity market prices that the project and generation owners receive in the ISO-NE capacity markets.
Three CfDs (totaling approximately 500 MW of peaking capacity) with three peaking generation units. The three peaker CfDs pay the
generation owners the difference between capacity, forward reserve and energy market revenues and a cost-of service payment stream for
30 years beginning in 2008 (including costs of plant operation and the prices that the generation owners receive for capacity and other
products in the ISO-NE markets).
Long-term commitments to purchase approximately 250 MW of wind power from a Maine wind farm and 20 MW of solar power from a
multi-site project in Connecticut. Both of these projects are expected to be operational by the end of 2016.
On December 17, 2014 the PURA approved CL&P’s application to amend customer rates, effective December 1, 2014, for a total base distribution
rate increase of $152 million, which includes an authorized ROE of 9.02 percent for the first twelve month period and 9.17 percent thereafter. The
distribution rate increase included a revenue decoupling mechanism effective December 1, 2014, and the recovery of 2011 and 2012 storm
restoration costs and system resiliency costs. Also in December 2014, the PURA granted a re-opener request to CL&P’s base distribution rate
application for further review of the appropriate balance of ADIT utilized in the calculation of rate base. On July 2, 2015, the PURA issued a final
order that approved a settlement agreement filed on May 19, 2015 between CL&P and the PURA Prosecutorial Staff, and which included an increase
to total allowed annual revenue requirements of $18.4 million beginning December 1, 2014.
4
Sources and Availability of Electric Power Supply
As noted above, CL&P does not own any generation assets and purchases energy supply to serve its SS and LRS loads from a variety of competitive
sources through requests for proposals. CL&P periodically enters into full requirements contracts for the majority of SS loads for periods of up to
one year for its residential customers and small and medium commercial and industrial customers. CL&P is authorized to supply the remainder of
the SS loads through a self-managed process that includes bilateral purchases and spot market purchases. CL&P typically enters into full
requirements contracts for LRS for larger commercial and industrial customers every three months. Currently, CL&P has full requirements contracts
in place for 80 percent of its SS loads for the first half of 2016 and has bilateral purchases in place to self-manage the remaining 20 percent. For the
second half of 2016, CL&P has 50 percent of its SS load under full requirements contracts, intends to purchase an additional 30 percent of full
requirements and will self-manage the remainder as needed. None of the SS load for 2017 has been procured. CL&P has full requirements contracts
in place for its LRS loads through the second quarter of 2016 and intends to purchase 100 percent of full requirements for the third and fourth
quarters of 2016.
ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION – MASSACHUSETTS
NSTAR ELECTRIC COMPANY
WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC COMPANY
The electric distribution businesses of NSTAR Electric and WMECO consist primarily of the purchase, delivery and sale of electricity to residential,
commercial and industrial customers within their respective franchise service territories. As of December 31, 2015, NSTAR Electric furnished retail
franchise electric service to approximately 1.2 million customers in Boston and 80 surrounding cities and towns in Massachusetts, including Cape
Cod and Martha’s Vineyard, covering an area of approximately 1,700 square miles. WMECO provides retail franchise electric service to
approximately 209,000 customers in 59 cities and towns in the western region of Massachusetts, covering an area of approximately 1,500 square
miles. Neither NSTAR Electric nor WMECO owns any generating facilities used to supply customers, and each purchases its respective energy
requirements from competitive energy suppliers.
In 2009, WMECO was authorized by the DPU to install solar energy generation in its service territory. From 2010 through 2014, WMECO
completed development of a total of 8 MW solar generation facilities on sites in Pittsfield, Springfield, and East Springfield, Massachusetts.
WMECO will sell all energy and other products from its solar generation facilities into the ISO-NE market. NSTAR Electric does not own any solar
generation facilities.
The following table shows the sources of the 2015 electric franchise retail revenues of NSTAR Electric and WMECO based on categories of
customers:
(Thousands of Dollars, except percentages)
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Other
Total Retail Electric Revenues
NSTAR Electric
WMECO
$
$
2015
1,205,387
1,187,452
84,667
47,610
2,525,116
% of Total
48
47
3
2
100%
2015
255,797
135,222
35,439
5,778
432,236
$
$
% of Total
59
31
8
2
100%
A summary of NSTAR Electric’s and WMECO’s retail electric GWh sales volumes and percentage changes for 2015, as compared to 2014, is as
follows:
NSTAR Electric
WMECO
2015
2014
6,687
13,120
1,248
21,055
6,625
13,009
1,291
20,925
Percentage
Change
0.9 %
0.9 %
(3.3)%
0.6 %
2015
2014
1,465
1,478
620
3,563
1,494
1,466
626
3,586
Percentage
Change
(2.0)%
0.8 %
(0.9)%
(0.6)%
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Total
Rates
NSTAR Electric and WMECO are each subject to regulation by the DPU, which, among other things, has jurisdiction over rates, certain dispositions
of property and plant, mergers and consolidations, issuances of long-term securities, acquisition of securities, standards of service and construction
and operation of facilities. The present general rate structure for both NSTAR Electric and WMECO consists of various rate and service
classifications covering residential, commercial and industrial services. Massachusetts utilities are entitled under state law to charge rates that are
sufficient to allow them an opportunity to recover their reasonable operating and capital costs, in order to attract needed capital and maintain their
financial integrity, while also protecting relevant public interests.
Under Massachusetts law, all customers of each of NSTAR Electric and WMECO are entitled to choose their energy suppliers, while NSTAR
Electric or WMECO remains their electric distribution company. Both NSTAR Electric and WMECO purchase power from competitive suppliers on
behalf of, and pass the related cost through to, their respective customers who do not choose a competitive energy supplier (basic service). Most of
the residential customers of NSTAR Electric and WMECO have continued to buy their power from NSTAR Electric or WMECO at basic service
rates. Most commercial and industrial customers have switched to a competitive energy supplier.
5
The Cape Light Compact, an inter-governmental organization consisting of the 21 towns and two counties on Cape Cod and Martha’s Vineyard,
serves 200,000 customers through the delivery of energy efficiency programs, effective consumer advocacy, competitive electricity supply and green
power options. NSTAR Electric continues to provide electric service to these customers including the delivery of power, maintenance of
infrastructure, capital investment, meter reading, billing, and customer service.
NSTAR Electric continues to supply approximately 39 percent of its customer load at basic service rates while the other 61 percent of its customer
load has migrated to competitive energy suppliers. WMECO continues to supply approximately 41 percent of its customer load at basic service rates
while the other 59 percent of its customer load has migrated to competitive energy suppliers. Because customer migration is limited to energy supply
service, it has no impact on the delivery business or operating income of NSTAR Electric and WMECO.
The rates established by the DPU for NSTAR Electric and WMECO are comprised of the following:
•
A basic service charge that represents the collection of energy costs, including costs related to charge-offs of uncollectible energy costs
from customers. Electric distribution companies in Massachusetts are required to obtain and resell power to retail customers through basic
service for those who choose not to buy energy from a competitive energy supplier. Basic service rates are reset every six months (every
three months for large commercial and industrial customers). Additionally, the DPU has authorized NSTAR Electric to recover the cost of
its Dynamic Pricing Smart Grid Pilot Program and NSTAR Green wind contracts through the basic service charge. Basic service costs are
reconciled annually, with any differences refunded to, or recovered from, customers.
•
A distribution charge, which includes a fixed customer charge and a demand and/or energy charge to collect the costs of building and
expanding the infrastructure to deliver power to its destination, as well as ongoing operating costs.
•
For WMECO, a revenue decoupling adjustment that reconciles distribution revenue, on an annual basis, to the amount of distribution
revenue approved by the DPU in its last rate case in 2011. Currently, WMECO is allowed to collect $132.4 million annually.
•
A transmission charge that recovers the cost of transporting electricity over high voltage lines from generating plants to substations,
including costs allocated by ISO-NE to maintain the wholesale electric market.
•
A transition charge that represents costs to be collected primarily from previously held investments in generating plants, costs related to
existing above-market power contracts, and contract costs related to long-term power contract buy-outs.
•
An energy efficiency charge that represents a legislatively-mandated charge to collect costs for energy efficiency programs.
•
Reconciling adjustment charges that recover certain DPU-approved costs as follows: pension and PBOP benefits, low income customer
discounts, lost revenue and credits associated with net-metering facilities installed by customers, storms, consultants retained by the
attorney general, long-term renewable contracts and energy efficiency programs and lost base revenue associated with energy efficiency
measures. In addition to these adjustments common to both NSTAR Electric and WMECO, NSTAR Electric has reconciling adjustment
charges that collect costs associated with certain safety and reliability projects and a Smart Grid pilot program. WMECO has a reconciling
adjustment charge that recovers costs associated with certain solar projects owned and operated by WMECO.
As required by regulation, NSTAR Electric and WMECO, along with two other Massachusetts electric utilities, signed long-term commitments to
purchase a combined estimated generating capacity of approximately 334 MW of wind power from two wind farms in Maine over 15 years. The
projects are in various stages of permitting, development, or operation. One unit began operating in late 2015, and the other unit is expected to be in
operation by December 2016. In addition, WMECO previously signed a long-term commitment to purchase an estimated generating capacity of
approximately 37.5 MW of wind power from a wind farm in Maine over 15 years that is expected to be in operation in 2016.
Pursuant to a 2008 DPU order, Massachusetts electric utilities must adopt rate structures that decouple the volume of energy sales from the utility’s
revenues in their next rate case. WMECO is currently decoupled and NSTAR Electric will propose decoupling in its next rate case.
NSTAR Electric and WMECO are each subject to service quality (SQ) metrics that measure safety, reliability and customer service, and could be
required to pay to customers a SQ charge of up to 2.5 percent of annual transmission and distribution revenues for failing to meet such metrics.
Neither NSTAR Electric nor WMECO will be required to pay a SQ charge for its 2015 performance as each company achieved results at or above
target for all of its respective SQ metrics in 2015.
Sources and Availability of Electric Power Supply
As noted above, neither NSTAR Electric nor WMECO owns any generation assets (other than WMECO’s solar generation), and both companies
purchase their respective energy requirements from a variety of competitive sources through requests for proposals issued periodically, consistent
with DPU regulations. NSTAR Electric and WMECO enter into supply contracts for basic service for 50 percent of their respective residential and
small commercial and industrial customers twice per year for twelve month terms. Both NSTAR Electric and WMECO enter into supply contracts
for basic service for 100 percent of large commercial and industrial customers every three months.
6
ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION – NEW HAMPSHIRE
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
PSNH’s distribution business consists primarily of the generation, delivery and sale of electricity to its residential, commercial and industrial
customers. As of December 31, 2015, PSNH furnished retail franchise electric service to approximately 503,000 retail customers in 211 cities and
towns in New Hampshire, covering an area of approximately 5,630 square miles. PSNH currently owns and operates approximately 1,200 MW of
primarily coal-, natural gas-, and oil-fired electricity generation plants. PSNH’s distribution business includes the activities of its generation
business.
The Clean Air Project, a wet flue gas desulphurization system (Scrubber), was constructed and placed in service by PSNH at its Merrimack Station in
2011. The Scrubber reduces emissions of SO2 and mercury from Merrimack Station by over 90 percent, which is well in excess of state and federal
requirements. PSNH is permitted to recover prudent Scrubber costs through its default energy service rates under New Hampshire law. Effective
January 1, 2016, PSNH is recovering all Scrubber costs in rates charged to customers. For further information, see “Regulatory Developments and
Rate Matters – New Hampshire – Clean Air Project Prudence Proceeding” in the accompanying Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following table shows the sources of PSNH’s 2015 electric franchise retail revenues based on categories of customers:
PSNH
(Thousands of Dollars, except percentages)
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Other
Total Retail Electric Revenues
$
$
2015
505,806
312,918
76,914
35,103
930,741
% of Total
54
34
8
4
100%
A summary of PSNH’s retail electric GWh sales volumes and percentage changes for 2015, as compared to 2014, is as follows:
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Total
Rates
2015
2014
3,195
3,365
1,367
7,927
3,172
3,332
1,382
7,886
Percentage
Change
0.7 %
1.0 %
(1.1)%
0.5 %
PSNH is subject to regulation by the NHPUC, which, among other things, has jurisdiction over rates, certain dispositions of property and plant,
mergers and consolidations, issuances of securities, standards of service and construction and operation of facilities. New Hampshire utilities are
entitled under state law to charge rates that are sufficient to allow them an opportunity to recover their reasonable operating and capital costs, in order
to attract needed capital and maintain their financial integrity, while also protecting relevant public interests.
Under New Hampshire law, all of PSNH’s customers are entitled to choose competitive energy suppliers, with PSNH providing default energy
service under its ES rate for those customers who do not choose a competitive energy supplier. At the end of 2015, approximately 21 percent of all
of PSNH’s customers (approximately 53 percent of load) were taking service from competitive energy suppliers, compared to 21 percent of
customers (approximately 46 percent of load) at the end of 2014.
The rates established by the NHPUC for PSNH are comprised of the following:
•
A default energy service charge which recovers energy-related costs incurred as a result of providing electric generation service supply to
all customers that have not migrated to competitive energy suppliers. These charges recover the costs of PSNH’s generation, as well as
purchased power, and include an allowed ROE of 9.81 percent.
•
A distribution charge, which includes an energy and/or demand-based charge to recover costs related to the maintenance and operation of
PSNH’s infrastructure to deliver power to its destination, as well as power restoration and service costs. This includes a customer charge to
collect the cost of providing service to a customer; such as the installation, maintenance, reading and replacement of meters and
maintaining accounts and records.
•
A transmission charge that recovers the cost of transporting electricity over high voltage lines from generating plants to substations,
including costs allocated by ISO-NE to maintain the wholesale electric market.
•
A stranded cost recovery charge (SCRC), which allows PSNH to recover its stranded costs, including above-market expenses incurred
under mandated power purchase obligations and other long-term investments and obligations.
7
•
A system benefits charge (SBC), which funds energy efficiency programs for all customers as well as assistance programs for residential
customers within certain income guidelines.
•
An electricity consumption tax, which is a state mandated tax on electric energy consumption.
The energy charge and SCRC rates change semi-annually and are reconciled annually and differences between actual costs incurred versus current
rates are either refunded or recovered in subsequent rates charged to customers.
PSNH distribution rates were set in a 2010 NHPUC rate case settlement, which expired on June 30, 2015. In the 2015 PSNH Settlement Agreement,
the Company agreed that its present distribution rates will stay in effect until at least July 1, 2017. However, certain aspects of the 2010 rate case
settlement will continue, including funding for reliability enhancement program activities, adjustment of distribution rates for certain exogenous
events that in the aggregate exceed $1 million, and major storm reserve funding.
Generation Divestiture
In 2013, the NHPUC opened a docket to investigate market conditions affecting PSNH’s default energy service rate, how PSNH will maintain just
and reasonable rates in light of those conditions, and any impact of PSNH’s generation ownership on the New Hampshire competitive electric
market. In April 2014, the NHPUC staff issued a “Preliminary Status Report Addressing the Economic Interest of PSNH’s Retail Customers as it
Relates to the Potential Divestiture of PSNH’s Generating Plants,” which included a consultant’s analysis of the fair market value of PSNH
generating assets and long-term power purchase contracts. The consultant’s analysis estimated the fair market value of PSNH’s generation assets to
be $225 million as of December 31, 2013 and compared that amount to a stated net book value of $660 million, implying potential “stranded costs”
of approximately $435 million. An abbreviated draft update by the consultant dated August 17, 2015, increased the estimated fair market value of
PSNH’s generation assets to $235 million.
In 2014, the Legislature enacted changes to the laws governing divestiture of PSNH’s generation assets, effective September 30, 2014. The new law
required the NHPUC to initiate a proceeding to determine whether all or some of PSNH’s generation assets should be divested. The law gives the
NHPUC express authority to order the divestiture of all or some of PSNH’s generation assets if the NHPUC finds it is in the economic interest of
customers to do so. The law also clarified the definition of “stranded costs” to include costs approved for recovery by the NHPUC in connection
with the divestiture or retirement of PSNH’s generation assets.
On June 10, 2015, Eversource and PSNH entered into the 2015 Public Service Company of New Hampshire Restructuring and Rate Stabilization
Agreement (the Agreement) with the New Hampshire Office of Energy and Planning, certain members of the NHPUC staff, the Office of Consumer
Advocate, two state senators, and several other parties. The Agreement was filed with the NHPUC on the same day. Under the terms of the
Agreement, PSNH has agreed to divest its generation assets upon NHPUC approval. The Agreement is designed to provide a resolution of issues
pertaining to PSNH’s generation assets in pending regulatory proceedings before the NHPUC. The Agreement provided for the Clean Air Project
prudence proceeding to be resolved and all remaining Clean Air Project costs to be included in rates effective January 1, 2016. As part of the
Agreement, PSNH has agreed to forego recovery of $25 million of the deferred equity return related to the Clean Air Project. In addition, PSNH will
not seek a general distribution rate increase effective before July 1, 2017 and will contribute $5 million to create a clean energy fund, which will not
be recoverable from its customers.
In 2015, the Legislature enacted changes to law to allow the use of securitization financing to recover any stranded costs resulting from the
divestiture of PSNH’s generating assets. If the Agreement is approved, following divestiture of PSNH’s generating assets, bonds will be issued to
recover resulting stranded costs.
On January 26, 2016, Advisory Staff of the NHPUC and the parties to the Agreement filed a stipulation with the NHPUC agreeing that near-term
divestiture of PSNH’s generation was in the public interest and that the Agreement should be approved. Implementation of the Agreement is subject
to NHPUC approval, which is expected in early 2016.
Sources and Availability of Electric Power Supply
During 2015, approximately 54 percent of PSNH’s load was met through its own generation, long-term power supply provided pursuant to orders of
the NHPUC, and contracts with competitive energy suppliers. The remaining 46 percent of PSNH’s load was met by short-term (less than one year)
purchases and spot purchases in the competitive New England wholesale power market. PSNH expects to meet its load requirements in 2016 in a
similar manner. Included in the 54 percent above are PSNH’s obligations to purchase power from approximately two dozen IPPs, the output of
which it either uses to serve its customer load or sells into the ISO-NE market.
Merrimack and Schiller Stations have recently operated at lower than typical capacity factors due to moderate regional temperatures. The Hydro
stations have been operating at high capacity factors. PSNH’s Energy Service Rate has been set at 9.99 cents per kWh effective January 1, 2016,
which includes 1.27 cents per kWh reflecting full recovery of costs related to the Clean Air Project.
ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION SEGMENT
General
Each of CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO owns and maintains transmission facilities that are part of an interstate power transmission
grid over which electricity is transmitted throughout New England. Each of CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO, and most other New
England utilities, are parties to a series of agreements that provide for coordinated planning and operation of the region’s transmission facilities and
8
the rules by which they acquire transmission services. Under these arrangements, ISO-NE, a non-profit corporation whose board of directors and
staff are independent of all market participants, serves as the regional transmission organization of the New England transmission system.
Wholesale Transmission Revenues
A summary of Eversource Energy’s wholesale transmission revenues is as follows:
(Thousands of Dollars)
CL&P
NSTAR Electric
PSNH
WMECO
Total Wholesale Transmission Revenues
$
$
2015
513,025
299,241
127,509
129,502
1,069,277
Wholesale Transmission Rates
Wholesale transmission revenues are recovered through FERC approved formula rates. Transmission revenues are collected from New England
customers, the majority of which are distribution customers of CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO. The transmission rates provide for the
annual reconciliation of estimated to actual costs. The financial impacts of differences between actual and estimated costs are deferred for future
recovery from, or refunded to, transmission customers.
FERC Base ROE Complaints
Three separate complaints have been filed at the FERC by combinations of New England state attorneys general, state regulatory commissions,
consumer advocates, consumer groups, municipal parties and other parties (the “Complainants”). In these three separate complaints, the
Complainants challenged the NETOs’ base ROE of 11.14 percent that had been utilized since 2006 and sought an order to reduce it prospectively
from the date of the final FERC order and for the 15-month complaint refund periods stipulated in the separate complaints. In 2014, the FERC
ordered a 10.57 percent base ROE for the first complaint refund period and prospectively from October 16, 2014 and that a utility’s total or
maximum ROE shall not exceed the top of the new zone of reasonableness, which was set at 11.74 percent. The NETOs and the Complainants
sought rehearing from the FERC. In late 2014, the NETOs made a compliance filing and the Company began issuing refunds to customers from the
first complaint period.
On March 3, 2015, FERC issued an order denying all issues raised on rehearing by the NETOs and Complainants in the first complaint. The FERC
order upheld the base ROE of 10.57 percent for the first complaint refund period and prospectively from October 16, 2014, and upheld that the
utility’s total ROE (the base ROE plus any incentive adders) for the transmission assets to which the adder applies is capped at the top of the zone of
reasonableness, which is currently set at 11.74 percent. The NETOs and Complainants have filed appeals to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals,
which have been consolidated, and briefing is scheduled to be concluded in the second quarter of 2016. A court decision is expected in late 2016.
For the second and third complaint proceedings, hearings were held in late June and early July 2015 and briefs were filed in July and August 2015.
The state parties, municipal utilities and FERC trial staff each believe that the base ROE should be reduced to an amount lower than 10.57 percent.
The NETOs believe that the Complainants’ positions are without merit, and the existing base ROE of 10.57 is just and reasonable and should be
maintained. On December 18, 2015, the FERC ALJ reopened the record to have the NETOs and FERC trial staff review certain calculations. The
FERC ALJ’s initial recommendation is expected by March 31, 2016. A final FERC order is expected in late 2016 or early 2017.
Although Eversource is uncertain on the final outcome of the second and third complaints regarding the ROE, we believe the current reserves
established are appropriate to reflect probable and reasonably estimable refunds. For further information, see “FERC Regulatory Issues – FERC ROE
Complaints” in the accompanying Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
FERC Order No. 1000
On August 15, 2014, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the FERC’s authority to order major changes to transmission planning and cost
allocation in FERC Order No. 1000 and Order No. 1000-A, including transmission planning for public policy needs, and the requirement that utilities
remove from their transmission tariffs their rights of first refusal to build transmission. On March 19, 2015, the FERC acted on all rehearing requests
filed by the NETOs, including CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO, and other parties and accepted the November 2013 compliance filing
made by ISO-NE and the NETOs, subject to further compliance. The FERC accepted our proposal that the new competitive transmission planning
process will not apply to certain projects, which have been declared as the preferred solution by ISO-NE, unless ISO-NE later decides a solution must
be re-evaluated. The FERC determined on rehearing that we can restore provisions that recognize the NETOs’ rights to retain use and control of
their existing rights of ways. Final compliance was filed by the NETOs in November 2015 and was accepted by the FERC on December 14, 2015.
Additionally, the FERC affirmed that it can eliminate our right of first refusal to build transmission in New England even though the FERC
previously approved and granted special protections to these rights. The NETOs filed an appeal to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, challenging
this FERC ruling. State regulators also filed an appeal, challenging FERC’s determination that ISO-NE should select public policy transmission
projects after a competitive process. The Court is expected to resolve the appeals in 2016.
9
Transmission Projects
During 2015, we were involved in the planning, development and construction of a series of electric transmission projects, including the NEEWS
family of projects; the Greater Hartford Central Connecticut (GHCC) solutions; and Greater Boston Reliability Solutions, which are a series of new
transmission projects over the next five years that will enhance system reliability and improve capacity. We were involved in the planning and
development of Northern Pass, which is our planned HVDC transmission line from the Québec-New Hampshire border to Franklin, New Hampshire
and an associated alternating current radial transmission line between Franklin and Deerfield, New Hampshire; and the Clean Energy Connect
Project, which is a planned transmission, wind and hydro generation project that we intend to develop with experienced renewable generation
companies. For further information, see “Business Development and Capital Expenditures – Electric Transmission Business” in the accompanying
Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Transmission Rate Base
Under our FERC-approved tariff, and with the exception of transmission projects that received specific FERC approval to include CWIP in rate base,
transmission projects generally enter rate base after they are placed in commercial operation. At the end of 2015, our estimated transmission rate
base was approximately $5.2 billion, including approximately $2.4 billion at CL&P, $1.4 billion at NSTAR Electric, $548 million at PSNH, and
$625 million at WMECO.
NATURAL GAS DISTRIBUTION SEGMENT
NSTAR Gas distributes natural gas to approximately 286,000 customers in 51 communities in central and eastern Massachusetts covering 1,067
square miles, and Yankee Gas distributes natural gas to approximately 226,000 customers in 71 cities and towns in Connecticut covering 2,187
square miles. Total throughput (sales and transportation) in 2015 was approximately 71.7 Bcf for NSTAR Gas and 57.8 Bcf for Yankee Gas. Our
natural gas businesses provide firm natural gas sales service to retail customers who require a continuous natural gas supply throughout the year, such
as residential customers who rely on natural gas for heating, hot water and cooking needs, and commercial and industrial customers who choose to
purchase natural gas from Eversource Energy’s natural gas distribution companies. A portion of the storage of natural gas supply for NSTAR Gas
during the winter heating season is provided by Hopkinton LNG Corp., an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Eversource Energy. NSTAR Gas
has access to Hopkinton LNG Corp. facilities in Hopkinton, Massachusetts consisting of a LNG liquefaction and vaporization plant and three above-
ground cryogenic storage tanks having an aggregate capacity of 3.0 Bcf of liquefied natural gas. NSTAR Gas also has access to Hopkinton LNG
Corp. facilities in Acushnet, Massachusetts that include additional storage capacity of 0.5 Bcf and additional vaporization capacity.
Yankee Gas owns a 1.2 Bcf LNG facility in Waterbury, Connecticut, which is used primarily to assist Yankee Gas in meeting its supplier-of-last-
resort obligations and also enables it to provide economic supply and make economic refill of natural gas typically during periods of low demand.
NSTAR Gas and Yankee Gas generate revenues primarily through the sale and/or transportation of natural gas. Predominantly all residential
customers in the NSTAR Gas service territory buy gas supply and delivery from NSTAR Gas while all customers may choose their natural gas
suppliers. Retail natural gas service in Connecticut is partially unbundled: residential customers in Yankee Gas’ service territory buy natural gas
supply and delivery only from Yankee Gas while commercial and industrial customers may choose their natural gas suppliers. NSTAR Gas offers
firm transportation service to all customers who purchase natural gas from sources other than NSTAR Gas while Yankee Gas offers firm
transportation service to its commercial and industrial customers who purchase natural gas from sources other than Yankee Gas. In addition, both
natural gas distribution companies offer interruptible transportation and interruptible natural gas sales service to those high volume commercial and
industrial customers, generally during the colder months, that have the capability to switch from natural gas to an alternative fuel on short notice, for
whom NSTAR Gas and Yankee Gas can interrupt service during peak demand periods or at any other time to maintain distribution system integrity.
The following table shows the sources of the 2015 total Eversource Energy natural gas franchise retail revenues based on categories of customers:
(Thousands of Dollars, except percentages)
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Total Retail Natural Gas Revenues
$
$
2015
497,873
327,439
93,378
918,690
% of Total
54
36
10
100%
A summary of our firm natural gas sales volumes in million cubic feet and percentage changes for 2015, as compared to 2014, is as follows:
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Total
Total, Net of Special Contracts (1)
2015
2014
Percentage
Change
38,455
43,006
21,538
102,999
98,458
38,969
42,977
22,245
104,191
99,500
(1.3)%
0.1 %
(3.2)%
(1.1)%
(1.0)%
(1) Special contracts are unique to the customers who take service under such an arrangement and generally specify the amount of distribution
revenue to be paid to Yankee Gas regardless of the customers’ usage.
Our firm natural gas sales volumes are subject to many of the same influences as our retail electric sales volumes. In addition, they have benefited
from customer growth in both of our natural gas distribution companies. In 2015, consolidated firm natural gas sales volumes were lower, as
10
compared to 2014. The 2015 firm natural gas sales volumes were negatively impacted by record warm weather in the fourth quarter of 2015, when
compared to 2014, partially offset by colder winter weather in the first quarter of 2015, as compared to 2014, throughout our natural gas service
territories. Weather-normalized Eversource consolidated firm natural gas sales volumes increased 2.5 percent in 2015, as compared to 2014, due
primarily to improved economic conditions as well as residential and commercial customer growth, through conversions to natural gas service.
Rates
NSTAR Gas and Yankee Gas are subject to regulation by the DPU and the PURA, respectively, which, among other things, have jurisdiction over
rates, certain dispositions of property and plant, mergers and consolidations, issuances of long-term securities, standards of service and construction
and operation of facilities. Both of Eversource Energy’s natural gas companies are entitled under their respective state law to charge rates that are
sufficient to allow them an opportunity to recover their reasonable operating and capital costs, in order to attract needed capital and maintain their
financial integrity, while also protecting relevant public interests.
Retail natural gas delivery and supply rates are established by the DPU and the PURA and are comprised of:
•
A distribution charge consisting of a fixed customer charge and a demand and/or energy charge that collects the costs of building and
expanding the natural gas infrastructure to deliver natural gas supply to its customers. This also includes collection of ongoing operating
costs;
•
A seasonal cost of gas adjustment clause (CGAC) at NSTAR Gas that collects natural gas supply costs, pipeline and storage capacity costs,
costs related to charge-offs of uncollected energy costs and working capital related costs. The CGAC is reset semi-annually. In addition,
NSTAR Gas files interim changes to its CGAC factor when the actual costs of natural gas supply vary from projections by more than five
percent; and
•
A local distribution adjustment clause (LDAC) at NSTAR Gas that collects all energy efficiency and related program costs, environmental
costs, pension and PBOP related costs, attorney general consultant costs, and costs associated with low income customers. The LDAC is
reset annually and provides for the recovery of certain costs applicable to both sales and transportation customers.
•
Purchased Gas Adjustment (PGA) clause, which allows Yankee Gas to recover the costs of the procurement of natural gas for its firm and
seasonal customers. Differences between actual natural gas costs and collection amounts on August 31st of each year are deferred and then
recovered from or refunded to customers during the following year. Carrying charges on outstanding balances are calculated using Yankee
Gas’ weighted average cost of capital in accordance with the directives of the PURA; and
•
Conservation Adjustment Mechanism (CAM) at Yankee Gas, which allows 100 percent recovery of conservation costs through this
mechanism including program incentives to promote energy efficiency, as well as recovery of any lost revenues associated with
implementation of energy conservation measures. A reconciliation of CAM revenues to expenses is performed annually with any
difference being recovered from or refunded to customers, with carrying charges, during the following year.
NSTAR Gas purchases financial contracts based on NYMEX natural gas futures in order to reduce cash flow variability associated with the purchase
price for approximately one-third of its natural gas purchases. These purchases are made under a program approved by the DPU in 2006. This
practice attempts to minimize the impact of fluctuations in natural gas prices to NSTAR Gas’ firm natural gas customers. These financial contracts
do not procure natural gas supply. All costs incurred or benefits realized when these contracts are settled are included in the CGAC.
NSTAR Gas is subject to service quality (SQ) metrics that measure safety, reliability and customer service and could be required to pay to customers
a SQ charge of up to 2.5 percent of annual distribution revenues for failing to meet such metrics. NSTAR Gas will not be required to pay a SQ
charge for its 2015 performance as it achieved results at or above target for all of its SQ metrics in 2015.
On October 30, 2015, the DPU issued its order in the NSTAR Gas distribution rate case, which approved an annualized base rate increase of $15.8
million, plus other increases of approximately $11.5 million, mostly relating to recovery of pension and PBOP expenses and the Hopkinton Gas
Service Agreement, effective January 1, 2016. In the order, the DPU also approved an authorized regulatory ROE of 9.8 percent, the establishment
of a revenue decoupling mechanism, the recovery of certain bad debt expenses, and a 52.1 percent equity component of its capital structure. On
November 19, 2015, NSTAR Gas filed a motion for reconsideration of the order with the DPU seeking the correction of mathematical errors and
other plant and cost of service items.
Yankee Gas’ last rate proceeding was in 2011, which approved an allowed ROE of 8.83 percent and allowed for a substantial increase in annual
spending for bare steel and cast iron pipeline replacement. In 2015, Yankee Gas entered into a settlement agreement with the PURA staff pursuant to
which Yankee Gas provided a $1.5 million rate credit to firm customers beginning in December 2015, and established an earnings sharing
mechanism whereby Yankee Gas and its customers will share equally in any earnings exceeding a 9.5 percent ROE in a twelve month period
commencing with the period from April 1, 2015 through March 31, 2016.
11
Massachusetts Natural Gas Replacement and Expansion
On July 7, 2014, Massachusetts enacted “An Act Relative to Natural Gas Leaks” (the Act). The Act establishes a uniform natural gas leak
classification standard for all Massachusetts natural gas utilities and a program that accelerates the replacement of aging natural gas infrastructure.
The program will enable companies, including NSTAR Gas, to better manage the scheduling and costs of replacement. The Act also calls for the
DPU to authorize natural gas utilities to design and offer programs to customers that will increase the availability, affordability and feasibility of
natural gas service for new customers.
In October 2014, pursuant to the Act, NSTAR Gas filed the Gas System Enhancement Program (GSEP) with the DPU. NSTAR Gas’ program
accelerates the replacement of certain natural gas distribution facilities in the system to within 25 years. The GSEP includes a new tariff effective
January 1, 2016 that provides NSTAR Gas an opportunity to collect the costs for the program on an annual basis through a newly designed
reconciling factor. On April 30, 2015, the DPU approved the GSEP. We expect capital expenditures of approximately $255 million for the period
2016 through 2019 for the GSEP.
Connecticut Natural Gas Expansion Plan
In 2013, in accordance with Connecticut law and regulations, the PURA approved a comprehensive joint natural gas infrastructure expansion plan
(expansion plan) filed by Yankee Gas and other Connecticut natural gas distribution companies. The expansion plan described how Yankee Gas
expects to add approximately 82,000 new natural gas heating customers over a 10-year period. Yankee Gas estimates that its portion of the plan will
cost approximately $700 million over 10 years. In January 2015, the PURA approved a joint settlement agreement proposed by Yankee Gas and
other Connecticut natural gas distribution companies and regulatory agencies that clarified the procedures and oversight criteria applicable to the
expansion plan. On March 20, 2015, Yankee Gas filed its initial System Expansion (SE) Rate reconciliation for 2014. The proposed SE rate was
approved by the PURA for implementation as of April 1, 2015, pending final PURA approval following a contested hearing.
Sources and Availability of Natural Gas Supply
NSTAR Gas maintains a flexible resource portfolio consisting of natural gas supply contracts, transportation contracts on interstate pipelines, market
area storage and peaking services. NSTAR Gas purchases transportation, storage, and balancing services from Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and
Algonquin Gas Transmission Company, as well as other upstream pipelines that transport gas from major producing regions in the U.S., including
the Gulf Coast, Mid-continent region, and Appalachian Shale supplies to the final delivery points in the NSTAR Gas service area. NSTAR Gas
purchases all of its natural gas supply under a firm portfolio management contract with a term of one year, which has a maximum quantity of
approximately 154,700 MMBtu/day of firm flowing natural gas supplies and 76,700 MMBtu/day of firm natural gas storage supplies.
In addition to the firm transportation and natural gas supplies mentioned above, NSTAR Gas utilizes contracts for underground storage and LNG
facilities to meet its winter peaking demands. The LNG facilities, described below, are located within NSTAR Gas’ distribution system and are used
to liquefy and store pipeline natural gas during the warmer months for vaporization and use during the heating season. During the summer injection
season, excess pipeline capacity and supplies are used to deliver and store natural gas in market area underground storage facilities located in the
New York and Pennsylvania regions. Stored natural gas is withdrawn during the winter season to supplement flowing pipeline supplies in order to
meet firm heating demand. NSTAR Gas has firm underground storage contracts and total storage capacity entitlements of approximately 6.6 Bcf.
A portion of the storage of natural gas supply for NSTAR Gas during the winter heating season is provided by Hopkinton LNG Corp., which owns an
LNG liquefaction and vaporization plant and three above-ground cryogenic storage tanks having an aggregate capacity of 3.0 Bcf of liquefied natural
gas. NSTAR Gas also has access to Hopkinton LNG Corp. facilities that include additional storage capacity of 0.5 Bcf and additional vaporization
capacity.
The PURA requires that Yankee Gas meet the needs of its firm customers under all weather conditions. Specifically, Yankee Gas must structure its
supply portfolio to meet firm customer needs under a design day scenario (defined as the coldest day in 30 years) and under a design year scenario
(defined as the average of the four coldest years in the last 30 years). Yankee Gas’ on-system stored LNG and underground storage supplies help to
meet consumption needs during the coldest days of winter. Yankee Gas obtains its interstate capacity from the three interstate pipelines that directly
serve Connecticut: the Algonquin, Tennessee and Iroquois Pipelines. Yankee Gas has long-term firm contracts for capacity on TransCanada
Pipelines Limited Pipeline, Vector Pipeline, L.P., Tennessee Gas Pipeline, Iroquois Gas Transmission Pipeline, Algonquin Pipeline, Union Gas
Limited, Dominion Transmission, Inc., National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation, Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Company, and Texas Eastern
Transmission, L.P. pipelines.
Based on information currently available regarding projected growth in demand and estimates of availability of future supplies of pipeline natural
gas, NSTAR Gas and Yankee Gas each believes that participation in planned and anticipated pipeline and storage expansion projects will be required
in order for it to meet current and future sales growth opportunities.
NATURAL GAS PIPELINE EXPANSION
Access Northeast is a natural gas pipeline and storage project (the “Project”) being developed jointly by Eversource, Spectra Energy Corp and
National Grid. Access Northeast will enhance the Algonquin and Maritimes & Northeast pipeline systems using existing routes and will include two
new LNG storage tanks and liquefaction and vaporization facilities in Acushnet, Massachusetts that will be connected to the Algonquin gas pipeline.
The Project is expected to be capable of delivering approximately 900 million cubic feet of additional natural gas per day to New England on peak
demand days. Eversource and Spectra Energy Corp each own a 40 percent interest in the Project, with the remaining 20 percent interest owned by
National Grid. The total projected cost for both the pipeline and the LNG storage is expected to be approximately $3 billion with anticipated in-
service dates commencing in November 2018. The Project is subject to FERC and other federal and state regulatory approvals. On November 17,
12
2015, the FERC accepted the Project’s request to initiate the pre-filing review process. Upon completion of the pre-filing review, a certificate
application will be filed with the FERC. In late 2015, the Project bid into the New England Natural Gas Pipeline Capacity RFP conducted by certain
EDCs in Massachusetts and Rhode Island, including NSTAR Electric and WMECO in Massachusetts, and in December 2015 and January 2016,
those Massachusetts EDCs filed with the DPU seeking approval of the contracts for pipeline and storage capacity with the Project. We expect the
Rhode Island EDC to file its selected contracts with the Rhode Island regulatory agencies in the first half of 2016. In February 2016, PSNH filed for
approval with the NHPUC, of its proposed contract for natural gas pipeline capacity and storage with the Project.
PROJECTED CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
We project to make capital expenditures of approximately $9.2 billion from 2016 through 2019. Of the $9.2 billion, we expect to invest
approximately $4.9 billion in our electric and natural gas distribution segments and $3.9 billion in our electric transmission segment. In addition, we
project to invest approximately $0.4 billion in information technology and facilities upgrades and enhancements. These projections do not include
capital expenditures related to Access Northeast or Clean Energy Connect.
FINANCING
Our credit facilities and indentures require that Eversource Energy parent and certain of its subsidiaries, including CL&P, NSTAR Electric, NSTAR
Gas, PSNH, WMECO and Yankee Gas, comply with certain financial and non-financial covenants as are customarily included in such agreements,
including maintaining a ratio of consolidated debt to total capitalization of no more than 65 percent. All of these companies currently are, and expect
to remain, in compliance with these covenants.
As of December 31, 2015, a total of $200 million of Eversource’s long-term debt, all at NSTAR Electric, will be paid in the next 12 months.
NUCLEAR FUEL STORAGE
CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH, WMECO and several other New England electric utilities are stockholders in three inactive regional nuclear
generation companies, CYAPC, MYAPC and YAEC (collectively, the Yankee Companies). The Yankee Companies have completed the physical
decommissioning of their respective generation facilities and are now engaged in the long-term storage of their spent nuclear fuel. The Yankee
Companies have completed collection of their decommissioning and closure costs through the proceeds from the spent nuclear fuel litigation against
the DOE and has refunded amounts to its member companies. These proceeds were used by the Yankee Companies to offset the decommissioning
and closure cost amounts due from their member companies or to decrease the wholesale FERC-approved rates charged under power purchase
agreements with CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO and several other New England utilities. The decommissioning rates charged by the
Yankee Companies have been reduced to zero. CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO can recover these costs from, or refund proceeds to,
their customers through state regulatory commission-approved retail rates.
We consolidate the assets and obligations of CYAPC and YAEC on our consolidated balance sheet because we own more than 50 percent of these
companies.
For information on the DOE proceeds received related to the spent nuclear fuel litigation, see Note 11C, “Commitments and Contingencies –
Contractual Obligations – Yankee Companies,” in the accompanying Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
OTHER REGULATORY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
General
We are regulated in virtually all aspects of our business by various federal and state agencies, including FERC, the SEC, and various state and/or
local regulatory authorities with jurisdiction over the industry and the service areas in which each of our companies operates, including the PURA,
which has jurisdiction over CL&P and Yankee Gas, the NHPUC, which has jurisdiction over PSNH, and the DPU, which has jurisdiction over
NSTAR Electric, NSTAR Gas and WMECO.
Environmental Regulation
We are subject to various federal, state and local requirements with respect to water quality, air quality, toxic substances, hazardous waste and other
environmental matters. Additionally, major generation and transmission facilities may not be constructed or significantly modified without a review
of the environmental impact of the proposed construction or modification by the applicable federal or state agencies.
Water Quality Requirements
The Clean Water Act requires every “point source” discharger of pollutants into navigable waters to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the EPA or state environmental agency specifying the allowable quantity and characteristics of its
effluent. States may also require additional permits for discharges into state waters. We are in the process of maintaining or renewing all required
NPDES or state discharge permits in effect for PSNH’s generation facilities.
In 1997, PSNH filed in a timely manner for a renewal of the NPDES permit for the Merrimack Station. As a result, the existing permit was
administratively continued. In 2011, the EPA issued a draft renewal NPDES permit for PSNH’s Merrimack Station for public review and comment.
The proposed permit contains many significant conditions to future operation. The proposed permit would require PSNH to install a closed-cycle
cooling system (including cooling towers) at the station. The EPA estimated that the net present value cost to install this system and operate it over a
13
20-year period would be approximately $112 million. PSNH and other electric utility groups filed thousands of pages of comments contesting EPA’s
draft permit requirements. PSNH stated that the data and studies supplied to the EPA demonstrate the fact that a closed-cycle cooling system is not
warranted. On April 18, 2015 EPA issued a revised section of the draft NPDES permit for Merrimack Station. The revised portion of the draft
permit deals solely with the treatment of wastewater from the flue gas desulfurization system. On August 18, 2015 PSNH again submitted
comments. The EPA does not have a set deadline to consider comments and to issue a final permit. Merrimack Station is permitted to continue to
operate under its present permit pending issuance of the final permit and subsequent resolution of matters appealed by PSNH and other parties. Due
to the site specific characteristics of PSNH’s other coal- and oil-fired electric generating stations, we believe it is unlikely that they would face
similar permitting determinations.
Air Quality Requirements
The Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA), as well as New Hampshire law, impose stringent requirements on emissions of SO2 and NOX for the
purpose of controlling acid rain and ground level ozone. In addition, the CAAA address the control of toxic air pollutants. Requirements for the
installation of continuous emissions monitors and expanded permitting provisions also are included.
In 2011, the EPA finalized the Mercury and Air Toxic Standards (MATS) that require the reduction of emissions of hazardous air pollutants from
new and existing coal- and oil-fired electric generating stations. Previously referred to as the Utility MACT (maximum achievable control
technology) rules, it establishes emission limits for mercury, arsenic and other hazardous air pollutants from coal- and oil-fired electric generating
stations. MATS is the first implementation of a nationwide emissions standard for hazardous air pollutants across all electric generating units and
provides utility companies with up to five years to meet the requirements. PSNH owns and operates approximately 1,000 MW of coal- and oil-fired
electric generating stations subject to MATS, including the two units at Merrimack Station, Newington Station and the two coal units at Schiller
Station. We believe the Clean Air Project at our Merrimack Station, together with existing equipment, will enable the facility to meet the MATS
requirements. At Schiller Station additional controls are being installed at the two coal-fired units, the cost of which is estimated to be approximately
$2.5 million.
Each of the states in which we do business also has Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) requirements, which generally require fixed percentages of
our energy supply to come from renewable energy sources such as solar, hydropower, landfill gas, fuel cells and other similar sources.
New Hampshire’s RPS provision requires increasing percentages of the electricity sold to retail customers to have direct ties to renewable sources.
In 2015, the total RPS obligation was 8.3 percent and it will ultimately reach 24.8 percent in 2025. Energy suppliers, like PSNH, must possess
sufficient quantities of RECs to satisfy the RPS requirements. PSNH owns renewable sources and uses a portion of internally generated RECs to
meet its RPS obligations and sells other internally generated RECs when it is economically beneficial to do so. To the extent that a supplier, like
PSNH, does not possess sufficient RECs to satisfy its RPS requirements, it makes up any shortfall by making an alternative compliance payment at a
rate per REC established by law. The costs of both the RECs and alternative compliance payments are recovered by PSNH through its default energy
service rates charged to customers.
Similarly, Connecticut’s RPS statute requires increasing percentages of the electricity sold to retail customers to have direct ties to renewable
sources. In 2015, the total RPS obligation was 19.5 percent and will ultimately reach 27 percent in 2020. CL&P is permitted to recover any costs
incurred in complying with RPS from its customers through its GSC rate.
Massachusetts’ RPS program also requires electricity suppliers to meet renewable energy standards. For 2015, the requirement was 19.25 percent,
and will ultimately reach 22.1 percent in 2020. NSTAR Electric and WMECO are permitted to recover any costs incurred in complying with RPS
from its customers through rates. WMECO also owns renewable solar generation resources. The RECs generated from WMECO’s solar units are
sold to other energy suppliers, and the proceeds from these sales are credited back to customers.
Hazardous Materials Regulations
We have recorded a liability for what we believe, based upon currently available information, is our reasonably estimable environmental
investigation, remediation, and/or Natural Resource Damages costs for waste disposal sites for which we have probable liability. Under federal and
state law, government agencies and private parties can attempt to impose liability on us for recovery of investigation and remediation costs at
hazardous waste sites. As of December 31, 2015, the liability recorded for our reasonably estimable and probable environmental remediation costs
for known sites needing investigation and/or remediation, exclusive of recoveries from insurance or from third parties, was approximately
$51.1 million, representing 64 sites. These costs could be significantly higher if additional remediation becomes necessary or when additional
information as to the extent of contamination becomes available.
The most significant liabilities currently relate to future clean-up costs at former MGP facilities. These facilities were owned and operated by our
predecessor companies from the mid-1800’s to mid-1900’s. By-products from the manufacture of gas using coal resulted in fuel oils, hydrocarbons,
coal tar, purifier wastes, metals and other waste products that may pose risks to human health and the environment. We currently have partial or full
ownership responsibilities at former MGP sites that have a reserve balance of $45.5 million of the total $51.1 million as of December 31, 2015.
Many of these MGP costs are recoverable from customers through our rates.
Electric and Magnetic Fields
For more than twenty years, published reports have discussed the possibility of adverse health effects from electric and magnetic fields (EMF)
associated with electric transmission and distribution facilities and appliances and wiring in buildings and homes. Although weak health risk
associations reported in some epidemiology studies remain unexplained, most researchers, as well as numerous scientific review panels, considering
14
all significant EMF epidemiology and laboratory studies, have concluded that the available body of scientific information does not support the
conclusion that EMF affects human health.
In accordance with recommendations of various regulatory bodies and public health organizations, we reduce EMF associated with new transmission
lines by the use of designs that can be implemented without additional cost or at a modest cost. We do not believe that other capital expenditures are
appropriate to minimize unsubstantiated risks.
Global Climate Change and Greenhouse Gas Emission Issues
Global climate change and greenhouse gas emission issues have received an increased focus from state governments and the federal government.
The EPA initiated a rulemaking addressing greenhouse gas emissions and, on December 7, 2009, issued a finding that concluded that greenhouse gas
emissions are “air pollution” that endangers public health and welfare and should be regulated. The largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the
U.S. is the electricity generating sector. The EPA has mandated greenhouse gas emission reporting beginning in 2011 for emissions for certain
aspects of our business including stationary combustion, volume of gas supplied to large customers and fugitive emissions of SF6 gas and methane.
We are continually evaluating the regulatory risks and regulatory uncertainty presented by climate change concerns. Such concerns could potentially
lead to additional rules and regulations that impact how we operate our business, both in terms of the generating facilities we own and operate as well
as general utility operations. These could include federal “cap and trade” laws, carbon taxes, fuel and energy taxes, or regulations requiring
additional capital expenditures at our generating facilities. We expect that any costs of these rules and regulations would be recovered from
customers.
Connecticut, New Hampshire and Massachusetts are each members of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), a cooperative effort by nine
northeastern and mid-Atlantic states, to develop a regional program for stabilizing and reducing CO2 emissions from coal- and oil-fired electric
generating plants. Because CO2 allowances issued by any participating state are usable across all nine RGGI state programs, the individual state CO2
trading programs, in the aggregate, form one regional compliance market for CO2 emissions. The third three-year control period took effect on
January 1, 2015 and extends through December 31, 2017. In this control period, each regulated power plant must hold CO2 allowances equal to 50
percent of its emissions during each of the first two years of the three-year period, and hold CO2 allowances equal to 100 percent of its remaining
emissions for the three-year control period at the end of the period.
PSNH anticipates that its generating units will emit between one million and three million tons of CO2 per year, depending on the capacity factor and
the utilization of the respective generation plant, excluding emissions from the operation of PSNH’s Northern Wood Power Project, which emissions
are an offset. PSNH satisfied its RGGI requirements by purchasing CO2 allowances at auction. The cost of complying with RGGI requirements is
recoverable from PSNH customers. Current legislation provides that the portion of the RGGI auction proceeds in excess of $1 per allowance will be
refunded to customers.
Because none of Eversource Energy’s other subsidiaries, CL&P, NSTAR Electric or WMECO, currently owns any generating assets (other than
WMECO’s solar photovoltaic facilities that do not emit CO2), none of them is required to acquire CO2 allowances. However, the CO2 allowance
costs borne by the generating facilities that are utilized by wholesale energy suppliers to satisfy energy supply requirements to CL&P, NSTAR
Electric and WMECO are likely to be included in the overall wholesale rates charged, which costs are then recoverable from customers.
FERC Hydroelectric Project Licensing
Federal Power Act licenses may be issued for hydroelectric projects for terms of 30 to 50 years as determined by the FERC. Upon the expiration of
an existing license, (i) the FERC may issue a new license to the existing licensee, (ii) the United States may take over the project, or (iii) the FERC
may issue a new license to a new licensee, upon payment to the existing licensee of the lesser of the fair value or the net investment in the project,
plus severance damages, less certain amounts earned by the licensee in excess of a reasonable rate of return.
PSNH currently owns nine hydroelectric generating stations with a current claimed capability representing winter rates of approximately 71 MW,
eight of which are licensed by the FERC under long-term licenses that expire on varying dates from 2017 through 2047. PSNH and its hydroelectric
projects are subject to conditions set forth in such licenses, the Federal Power Act and related FERC regulations, including provisions related to the
condemnation of a project upon payment of just compensation, amortization of project investment from excess project earnings, possible takeover of
a project after expiration of its license upon payment of net investment and severance damages and other matters. PSNH is currently completing the
relicensing application for its 6.5 MW Eastman Falls Hydro Station, the license for which expires in 2017.
EMPLOYEES
As of December 31, 2015, Eversource Energy employed a total of 7,943 employees, excluding temporary employees, of which 1,037 were employed
by CL&P, 1,240 were employed by NSTAR Electric, 694 were employed by PSNH, and 291 were employed by WMECO. Approximately 50
percent of our employees are members of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, the Utility Workers Union of America or The United
Steelworkers, and are covered by 14 collective bargaining agreements.
INTERNET INFORMATION
Our website address is www.eversource.com. We make available through our website a link to the SEC’s EDGAR website
(http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html), at which site Eversource Energy’s, CL&P’s, NSTAR Electric’s, PSNH’s and
WMECO’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports
may be reviewed. Information contained on the Company’s website or that can be accessed through the website is not incorporated into and does not
15
constitute a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Printed copies of these reports may be obtained free of charge by writing to our Investor
Relations Department at Eversource Energy, 107 Selden Street, Berlin, CT 06037.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the matters set forth under “Safe Harbor Statement Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995” included immediately
prior to Item 1, Business, above, we are subject to a variety of significant risks. Our susceptibility to certain risks, including those discussed in detail
below, could exacerbate other risks. These risk factors should be considered carefully in evaluating our risk profile.
Cyber breaches, acts of war or terrorism, or grid disturbances could negatively impact our business.
Cyber breaches, acts of war or terrorism, physical attacks or grid disturbances resulting from internal or external sources could target our
transmission, distribution and generation facilities or our information technology systems. Such actions could impair our ability to manage these
facilities, operate our systems effectively, or properly manage our data, networks and programs, resulting in loss of service to customers.
We have instituted safeguards to protect our operational systems and information technology assets. We devote substantial resources to network and
application security, encryption and other measures to protect our computer systems and infrastructure from unauthorized access or misuse and
interface with numerous external entities to improve our cybersecurity situational awareness. FERC, through the North American Electric Reliability
Corporation, requires certain safeguards to be implemented to deter cyber and/or physical attacks. These safeguards may not always be effective due
to the evolving nature of cyber and/or physical attacks.
Because our generation and transmission facilities are part of an interconnected regional grid, we face the risk of blackout due to a disruption on a
neighboring interconnected system.
Any such cyber breaches, acts of war or terrorism, physical attacks or grid disturbances could result in a significant decrease in revenues, significant
expense to repair system damage or security breaches, and liability claims, which could have a material adverse impact on our financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
Strategic development opportunities in both electric and natural gas transmission may not be successful and projects may not commence
operation as scheduled or be completed, which could have a material adverse effect on our business prospects.
We are pursuing broader strategic development investment opportunities that will benefit the New England region related to the construction of
electric and natural gas transmission facilities, interconnections to generating resources and other investment opportunities. The development,
construction and expansion of electric transmission and natural gas transmission facilities involve numerous risks. Various factors could result in
increased costs or result in delays or cancellation of these projects. Risks include regulatory approval processes, new legislation, economic events or
factors, environmental and community concerns, design and siting issues, difficulties in obtaining required rights of way, competition from
incumbent utilities and other entities, and actions of strategic partners. Should any of these factors result in such delays or cancellations, our financial
position, results of operations, and cash flows could be adversely affected or our future growth opportunities may not be realized as anticipated.
As a result of legislative and regulatory changes during 2015, the states in which we provide service have implemented new procedures to select for
construction new major electric transmission and gas pipeline facilities. These procedures require the review of competing projects and permit the
selection of only those projects that are expected to provide the greatest benefit to customers. If the projects in which we have invested are not
selected for construction, it would have a material adverse effect on our future financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
The actions of regulators and legislators can significantly affect our earnings, liquidity and business activities.
The rates that our electric and gas companies charge their customers are determined by their state regulatory commissions and by FERC. These
commissions also regulate the companies’ accounting, operations, the issuance of certain securities and certain other matters. FERC also regulates
the transmission of electric energy, the sale of electric energy at wholesale, accounting, issuance of certain securities and certain other matters.
Under state and federal law, our electric and gas companies are entitled to charge rates that are sufficient to allow them an opportunity to recover
their reasonable operating and capital costs, to attract needed capital and maintain their financial integrity, while also protecting relevant public
interests. Each of these companies prepares and submits periodic rate filings with their respective regulatory commissions for review and approval.
The FERC has jurisdiction over our transmission costs recovery and the allowed return on equity. The ROE has been contested by outside parties as
unjust and unreasonable. Certain outside parties have filed three complaints against all electric companies under the jurisdiction of ISO-NE alleging
that the ROE is unjust and unreasonable. The first complaint, which was concluded in 2015, resulted in a decrease of the allowed ROE. The second
and third complaints are currently under review with the FERC. The FERC has initiated a review of the regional and local transmission rates due to a
lack of adequate transparency. FERC also found that the formula rates generally lacked sufficient details to determine how costs are derived and
recovered in rates.
A federal appeals court decision has upheld the FERC’s authority to order major changes to transmission planning and cost allocation in FERC Order
No. 1000 and Order No. 1000-A, including transmission planning for public policy needs, and the requirement that utilities remove from their
transmission tariffs their rights of first refusal to build transmission. Additionally, the FERC affirmed that it can eliminate our right of first refusal to
build transmission in New England even though the FERC previously approved and granted special protections to these rights. Implementation of
FERC’s goals in New England, including within our service territories, may expose us to competition for construction of transmission projects,
16
additional regulatory considerations, and potential delay with respect to future transmission projects, which may adversely affect our results of
operation.
There is no assurance that the commissions will approve the recovery of all costs incurred by our electric and gas companies, including costs for
construction, operation and maintenance, as well as a reasonable return on their respective regulated assets. The amount of costs incurred by the
companies, coupled with increases in fuel and energy prices, could lead to consumer or regulatory resistance to the timely recovery of such costs,
thereby adversely affecting our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
If our settlement agreement regarding the divestiture of our generation assets in New Hampshire is not approved, it could have a material
adverse effect on our earnings.
Under our settlement agreement for the divestiture of our generation assets in New Hampshire, we will be entitled to collect from customers an
amount equal to the difference between the proceeds from the sale of these assets and the undepreciated book value of those assets. Costs related to
the divestiture would also be recoverable. To minimize the financial impact on customers in New Hampshire, the legislature passed legislation that
allows for the securitization of stranded costs to be recovered. If the NHPUC does not approve the settlement, we may not be able to fully recover
these costs in future rate proceedings, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Our transmission, distribution and generation systems may not operate as expected, and could require unplanned expenditures, which could
adversely affect our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Our ability to properly operate our transmission, distribution and generation systems is critical to the financial performance of our business. Our
transmission, distribution and generation businesses face several operational risks, including the breakdown, failure of, or damage to operating
equipment, information technology systems, or processes, especially due to age; labor disputes; disruptions in the delivery of electricity and natural
gas, including impacts on us or our customers; increased capital expenditure requirements, including those due to environmental regulation;
catastrophic events such as fires, explosions, or other similar occurrences; extreme weather conditions beyond equipment and plant design capacity;
other unanticipated operations and maintenance expenses and liabilities; and potential claims for property damage or personal injuries beyond the
scope of our insurance coverage. Many of our transmission projects are expected to alleviate identified reliability issues and reduce customers’ costs.
However, if the in-service date for one or more of these projects is delayed due to economic events or factors, or regulatory or other delays, the risk
of failures in the electricity transmission system may increase. Any failure of our transmission, distribution and generation systems to operate as
planned may result in increased capital costs, reduced earnings or unplanned increases in operation and maintenance costs. Outages at generating
stations may be deemed imprudent by the NHPUC resulting in disallowance of replacement power and repair costs. Such costs that are not
recoverable from our customers would have an adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Increases in electric and gas prices and/or a weak economy can lead to changes in legislative and regulatory policy promoting increased
energy efficiency, conservation, and self-generation and/or a reduction in our customers’ ability to pay their bills, which may adversely
impact our business.
Energy consumption is significantly impacted by the general level of economic activity and cost of energy supply. Economic downturns or periods
of high energy supply costs typically can lead to the development of legislative and regulatory policy designed to promote reductions in energy
consumption and increased energy efficiency and self-generation by customers. This focus on conservation, energy efficiency and self-generation
may result in a decline in electricity and natural gas sales in our service territories. Economic downturns or periods of high energy supply costs can
also impact customers’ ability to pay their energy bills, resulting in increased bad debt expense. If energy use were to decline or bad debt expense
were to increase, without corresponding adjustments in rates at our electric and gas companies that do not currently have revenue decoupling, then
our revenues would be reduced, which would have an adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Severe storms could cause significant damage to any of our facilities requiring extensive expenditures, the recovery for which is subject to
approval by regulators.
Severe weather, such as ice and snow storms, hurricanes and other natural disasters, may cause outages and property damage, which may require us
to incur additional costs that may not be recoverable from customers. The cost of repairing damage to our operating subsidiaries’ facilities and the
potential disruption of their operations due to storms, natural disasters or other catastrophic events could be substantial, particularly as regulators and
customers demand better and quicker response times to outages. If, upon review, any of our state regulatory authorities finds that our actions were
imprudent, some of those restoration costs may not be recoverable from customers. The inability to recover a significant amount of such costs could
have an adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Our goodwill is valued and recorded at an amount that, if impaired and written down, could adversely affect our future operating results
and total capitalization.
We have a significant amount of goodwill on our consolidated balance sheet. As of December 31, 2015, goodwill totaled $3.5 billion. The carrying
value of goodwill represents the fair value of an acquired business in excess of identifiable assets and liabilities as of the acquisition date. We test
our goodwill balances for impairment on an annual basis or whenever events occur or circumstances change that would indicate a potential for
impairment. A determination that goodwill is deemed to be impaired would result in a non-cash charge that could materially adversely affect our
financial position, results of operations and total capitalization. The annual goodwill impairment test in 2015 resulted in a conclusion that our
goodwill is not impaired.
17
Eversource Energy and its utility subsidiaries are exposed to significant reputational risks, which make them vulnerable to increased
regulatory oversight or other sanctions.
Because utility companies, including our electric and natural gas utility subsidiaries, have large customer bases, they are subject to adverse publicity
focused on the reliability of their distribution services and the speed with which they are able to respond to electric outages, natural gas leaks and
similar interruptions caused by storm damage or other unanticipated events. Adverse publicity of this nature could harm the reputations of
Eversource Energy and its subsidiaries; may make state legislatures, utility commissions and other regulatory authorities less likely to view
Eversource Energy and its subsidiaries in a favorable light; and may cause Eversource Energy and its subsidiaries to be subject to less favorable
legislative and regulatory outcomes or increased regulatory oversight. Unfavorable regulatory outcomes can include more stringent laws and
regulations governing our operations, such as reliability and customer service quality standards or vegetation management requirements, as well as
fines, penalties or other sanctions or requirements. The imposition of any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on the business,
results of operations, cash flow and financial condition of Eversource Energy and each of its utility subsidiaries.
Limits on our access to and increases in the cost of capital may adversely impact our ability to execute our business plan.
We use short-term debt and the long-term capital markets as a significant source of liquidity and funding for capital requirements not obtained from
our operating cash flow. If access to these sources of liquidity becomes constrained, our ability to implement our business strategy could be
adversely affected. In addition, higher interest rates would increase our cost of borrowing, which could adversely impact our results of operations. A
downgrade of our credit ratings or events beyond our control, such as a disruption in global capital and credit markets, could increase our cost of
borrowing and cost of capital or restrict our ability to access the capital markets and negatively affect our ability to maintain and to expand our
businesses.
Our counterparties may not meet their obligations to us or may elect to exercise their termination rights, which could adversely affect our
earnings.
We are exposed to the risk that counterparties to various arrangements who owe us money, have contracted to supply us with energy, coal, or other
commodities or services, or who work with us as strategic partners, including on significant capital projects, will not be able to perform their
obligations, will terminate such arrangements or, with respect to our credit facilities, fail to honor their commitments. Should any of these
counterparties fail to perform their obligations or terminate such arrangements, we might be forced to replace the underlying commitment at higher
market prices and/or have to delay the completion of, or cancel a capital project. Should any lenders under our credit facilities fail to perform, the
level of borrowing capacity under those arrangements could decrease. In any such events, our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows
could be adversely affected.
The unauthorized access to and the misappropriation of confidential and proprietary customer, employee, financial or system operating
information could adversely affect our business operations and adversely impact our reputation.
In the regular course of business we maintain sensitive customer, employee, financial and system operating information and are required by various
federal and state laws to safeguard this information. Cyber intrusions, security breaches, theft or loss of this information by cyber crime or otherwise
could lead to the release of critical operating information or confidential customer or employee information, which could adversely affect our
business operations or adversely impact our reputation, and could result in significant costs, fines and litigation. We maintain limited privacy
protection liability insurance to cover limited damages and defense costs arising from unauthorized disclosure of, or failure to protect, private
information as well as costs for notification to, or for credit card monitoring of, customers, employees and other persons in the event of a breach of
private information. This insurance covers amounts paid to avert, prevent or stop a network attack or the disclosure of personal information, and
costs of a qualified forensics firm to determine the cause, source and extent of a network attack or to investigate, examine and analyze our network to
find the cause, source and extent of a data breach. While we have implemented measures designed to prevent cyber-attacks and mitigate their effects
should they occur. These measures may not be effective due to the continually evolving nature of efforts to access confidential information.
The loss of key personnel or the inability to hire and retain qualified employees could have an adverse effect on our business, financial
position and results of operations.
Our operations depend on the continued efforts of our employees. Retaining key employees and maintaining the ability to attract new employees are
important to both our operational and financial performance. We cannot guarantee that any member of our management or any key employee at the
Eversource parent or subsidiary level will continue to serve in any capacity for any particular period of time. In addition, a significant portion of our
workforce, including many workers with specialized skills maintaining and servicing the electrical infrastructure, will be eligible to retire over the
next five to ten years. Such highly skilled individuals cannot be quickly replaced due to the technically complex work they perform. We have
developed strategic workforce plans to identify key functions and proactively implement plans to assure a ready and qualified workforce, but cannot
predict the impact of these plans on our ability to hire and retain key employees.
Market performance or changes in assumptions require us to make significant contributions to our pension and other postretirement benefit
plans.
We provide a defined benefit pension plan and other postretirement benefits for a substantial number of employees, former employees and retirees.
Our future pension obligations, costs and liabilities are highly dependent on a variety of factors beyond our control. These factors include estimated
investment returns, interest rates, discount rates, health care cost trends, benefit changes, salary increases and the demographics of plan participants.
If our assumptions prove to be inaccurate, our future costs could increase significantly. In addition, various factors, including underperformance of
plan investments and changes in law or regulation, could increase the amount of contributions required to fund our pension plan in the future.
Additional large funding requirements, when combined with the financing requirements of our construction program, could impact the timing and
18
amount of future financings and negatively affect our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. For further information, see Note 9A,
“Employee Benefits - Pensions and Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions,” to the financial statements.
Costs of compliance with environmental regulations, including climate change legislation, may increase and have an adverse effect on our
business and results of operations.
Our subsidiaries’ operations are subject to extensive federal, state and local environmental statutes, rules and regulations that govern, among other
things, air emissions, water discharges and the management of hazardous and solid waste. Compliance with these requirements requires us to incur
significant costs relating to environmental monitoring, maintenance and upgrading of facilities, remediation and permitting. The costs of compliance
with existing legal requirements or legal requirements not yet adopted may increase in the future. An increase in such costs, unless promptly
recovered, could have an adverse impact on our business and our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In addition, global climate change issues have received an increased focus from federal and state government agencies . Although we would expect
that any costs of these rules and regulations would be recovered from customers, their impact on energy use by customers and the ultimate impact on
our business would be dependent upon the specific rules and regulations adopted and cannot be determined at this time. The impact of these
additional costs to customers could lead to a further reduction in energy consumption resulting in a decline in electricity and gas sales in our service
territories, which would have an adverse impact on our business and financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Any failure by us to
comply with environmental laws and regulations, even if due to factors beyond our control, or reinterpretations of existing requirements, could also
increase costs. Existing environmental laws and regulations may be revised or new laws and regulations seeking to protect the environment may be
adopted or become applicable to us. Revised or additional laws could result in significant additional expense and operating restrictions on our
facilities or increased compliance costs, which may not be fully recoverable in distribution company rates. The cost impact of any such laws, rules or
regulations would be dependent upon the specific requirements adopted and cannot be determined at this time. For further information, see Item
1, Business - Other Regulatory and Environmental Matters, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
As a holding company with no revenue-generating operations, Eversource parent’s liquidity is dependent on dividends from its subsidiaries,
its commercial paper program, and its ability to access the long-term debt and equity capital markets.
Eversource parent is a holding company and as such, has no revenue-generating operations of its own. Its ability to meet its debt service obligations
and to pay dividends on its common shares is largely dependent on the ability of its subsidiaries to pay dividends to or repay borrowings from
Eversource parent, and/or Eversource parent’s ability to access its commercial paper program or the long-term debt and equity capital markets. Prior
to funding Eversource parent, the subsidiary companies have financial obligations that must be satisfied, including among others, their operating
expenses, debt service, preferred dividends of certain subsidiaries, and obligations to trade creditors. Additionally, the subsidiary companies could
retain their free cash flow to fund their capital expenditures in lieu of receiving equity contributions from Eversource parent. Should the subsidiary
companies not be able to pay dividends or repay funds due to Eversource parent, or if Eversource parent cannot access its commercial paper
programs or the long-term debt and equity capital markets, Eversource parent’s ability to pay interest, dividends and its own debt obligations would
be restricted.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
We do not have any unresolved SEC staff comments.
Item 2.
Properties
Transmission and Distribution System
As of December 31, 2015, Eversource and our electric operating subsidiaries owned the following:
Eversource
Number of substations owned
Transformer capacity (in kVa)
Overhead lines (in circuit miles)
Capacity range of overhead transmission lines (in kV)
Underground lines (distribution in circuit miles and
transmission in cable miles)
Capacity range of underground transmission lines (in kV)
Electric
Distribution
Electric
Transmission
512
41,484,000
40,258
N/A
16,778
N/A
66
13,780,000
3,932
69 to 345
407
69 to 345
19
Number of substations owned
Transformer capacity (in kVa)
Overhead lines (in circuit miles)
Capacity range of overhead
transmission lines (in kV)
Underground lines (distribution
in circuit miles and
transmission in cable miles)
Capacity range of underground
transmission lines (in kV)
CL&P
NSTAR Electric
PSNH
WMECO
Distribution
Transmission
Distribution
Transmission
Distribution
Transmission
Distribution
182
19,605,000
16,951
19
3,117,000
1,662
133
11,431,000
7,983
24
6,728,000
750
154
5,257,000
11,913
16
3,868,000
1,039
43
5,191,000
3,411
Transmission
7
67,000
481
N/A
69 to 345
N/A
115 to 345
N/A
115 to 345
N/A
69 to 345
6,528
136
7,354
260
1,821
1
1,075
N/A
69 to 345
N/A
115 to 345
N/A
115
N/A
10
115
Underground and overhead line transformers in service
Aggregate capacity (in kVa)
Electric Generating Plants
Eversource
618,387
35,097,967
CL&P
NSTAR
Electric
PSNH
WMECO
288,352
15,300,765
126,353
11,429,921
160,848
6,202,270
42,834
2,165,011
As of December 31, 2015, PSNH owned the following electric generating plants:
Type of Plant
Steam Plants
Hydro
Internal Combustion
Biomass
Total PSNH Generating Plant
Number
of Units
5
20
5
1
31
Year
Installed
1952-74
1901-83
1968-70
2006
Claimed Capability*
(kilowatts)
935,343
58,115
101,869
42,594
1,137,921
* Claimed capability represents winter ratings as of December 31, 2015. The combined nameplate capacity of the generating plants is
approximately 1,200 MW.
As of December 31, 2015, WMECO owned the following electric generating plants:
Type of Plant
Solar Fixed Tilt, Photovoltaic
Number
of Sites
3
Year
Installed
2010-14
Claimed Capability**
(kilowatts)
8,000
** Claimed capability represents the direct current nameplate capacity of the plant.
CL&P and NSTAR Electric do not own any electric generating plants.
Natural Gas Distribution System
As of December 31, 2015, Yankee Gas owned 28 active gate stations, 203 district regulator stations, and approximately 3,317 miles of natural gas
main pipeline. Yankee Gas also owns a liquefaction and vaporization plant and above ground storage tank with a storage capacity equivalent of 1.2
Bcf of natural gas in Waterbury, Connecticut.
As of December 31, 2015, NSTAR Gas owned 21 active gate stations, 164 district regulator stations, and approximately 3,250 miles of natural gas
main pipeline. Hopkinton, another subsidiary of Eversource, owns a satellite vaporization plant and above ground storage tanks in Acushnet, MA.
In addition, Hopkinton owns a liquefaction and vaporization plant with above ground storage tanks in Hopkinton, MA. Combined, the two plants’
tanks have an aggregate storage capacity equivalent to 3.5 Bcf of natural gas that is provided to NSTAR Gas under contract.
Franchises
CL&P Subject to the power of alteration, amendment or repeal by the General Assembly of Connecticut and subject to certain approvals, permits
and consents of public authority and others prescribed by statute, CL&P has, subject to certain exceptions not deemed material, valid franchises free
from burdensome restrictions to provide electric transmission and distribution services in the respective areas in which it is now supplying such
service.
In addition to the right to provide electric transmission and distribution services as set forth above, the franchises of CL&P include, among others,
limited rights and powers, as set forth under Connecticut law and the special acts of the General Assembly constituting its charter, to manufacture,
generate, purchase and/or sell electricity at retail, including to provide Standard Service, Supplier of Last Resort service and backup service, to sell
electricity at wholesale and to erect and maintain certain facilities on public highways and grounds, all subject to such consents and approvals of
public authority and others as may be required by law. The franchises of CL&P include the power of eminent domain. Connecticut law prohibits an
electric distribution company from owning or operating generation assets. However, under “An Act Concerning Energy Independence,” enacted in
2005, CL&P is permitted to own up to 200 MW of peaking facilities if the PURA determines that such facilities will be more cost effective than
other options for mitigating FMCC and Locational Installed Capacity (LICAP) costs. In addition, under “An Act Concerning Electricity and Energy
20
Efficiency,” enacted in 2007, an electric distribution company, such as CL&P, is permitted to purchase an existing electric generating plant located in
Connecticut that is offered for sale, subject to prior approval from the PURA and a determination by the PURA that such purchase is in the public
interest. Finally, Connecticut law also allows CL&P to submit a proposal to the DEEP to build, own or operate one or more generation facilities up
to 10 MWs using Class I renewable energy.
NSTAR Electric and NSTAR Gas Through their charters, which are unlimited in time, NSTAR Electric and NSTAR Gas have the right to engage
in the business of delivering and selling electricity and natural gas within their respective service territories, and have powers incidental thereto and
are entitled to all the rights and privileges of and subject to the duties imposed upon electric and natural gas companies under Massachusetts laws.
The locations in public ways for electric transmission and distribution lines and natural gas distribution pipelines are obtained from municipal and
other state authorities who, in granting these locations, act as agents for the state. In some cases the actions of these authorities are subject to appeal
to the DPU. The rights to these locations are not limited in time and are subject to the action of these authorities and the legislature. Under
Massachusetts law, with the exception of municipal-owned utilities, no other entity may provide electric or natural gas delivery service to retail
customers within NSTAR’s service territory without the written consent of NSTAR Electric and/or NSTAR Gas. This consent must be filed with the
DPU and the municipality so affected.
The Massachusetts restructuring legislation defines service territories as those territories actually served on July 1, 1997 and following municipal
boundaries to the extent possible. The restructuring legislation further provides that until terminated by law or otherwise, distribution companies
shall have the exclusive obligation to serve all retail customers within their service territories and no other person shall provide distribution service
within such service territories without the written consent of such distribution companies. Pursuant to the Massachusetts restructuring legislation, the
DPU (then, the Department of Telecommunications and Energy) was required to define service territories for each distribution company, including
NSTAR Electric. The DPU subsequently determined that there were advantages to the exclusivity of service territories and issued a report to the
Massachusetts Legislature recommending against, in this regard, any changes to the restructuring legislation.
PSNH The NHPUC, pursuant to statutory requirements, has issued orders granting PSNH exclusive franchises to distribute electricity in the
respective areas in which it is now supplying such service.
In addition to the right to distribute electricity as set forth above, the franchises of PSNH include, among others, rights and powers to manufacture,
generate, purchase, and transmit electricity, to sell electricity at wholesale to other utility companies and municipalities and to erect and maintain
certain facilities on certain public highways and grounds, all subject to such consents and approvals of public authority and others as may be required
by law. PSNH’s status as a public utility gives it the ability to petition the NHPUC for the right to exercise eminent domain for its transmission and
distribution services in appropriate circumstances.
PSNH is also subject to certain regulatory oversight by the Maine Public Utilities Commission and the Vermont Public Service Board.
WMECO WMECO is authorized by its charter to conduct its electric business in the territories served by it, and has locations in the public
highways for transmission and distribution lines. Such locations are granted pursuant to the laws of Massachusetts by the Department of Public
Works of Massachusetts or local municipal authorities and are of unlimited duration, but the rights thereby granted are not vested. Such locations are
for specific lines only and for extensions of lines in public highways. Further similar locations must be obtained from the Department of Public
Works of Massachusetts or the local municipal authorities. In addition, WMECO has been granted easements for its lines in the Massachusetts
Turnpike by the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority and pursuant to state laws, has the power of eminent domain.
The Massachusetts restructuring legislation applicable to NSTAR Electric (described above) is also applicable to WMECO.
Yankee Gas Yankee Gas holds valid franchises to sell natural gas in the areas in which Yankee Gas supplies natural gas service, which it acquired
either directly or from its predecessors in interest. Generally, Yankee Gas holds franchises to serve customers in areas designated by those franchises
as well as in most other areas throughout Connecticut so long as those areas are not occupied and served by another natural gas utility under a valid
franchise of its own or are not subject to an exclusive franchise of another natural gas utility. Yankee Gas’ franchises are perpetual but remain
subject to the power of alteration, amendment or repeal by the General Assembly of the State of Connecticut, the power of revocation by the PURA
and certain approvals, permits and consents of public authorities and others prescribed by statute. Generally, Yankee Gas’ franchises include, among
other rights and powers, the right and power to manufacture, generate, purchase, transmit and distribute natural gas and to erect and maintain certain
facilities on public highways and grounds, and the right of eminent domain, all subject to such consents and approvals of public authorities and others
as may be required by law.
Item 3.
Legal Proceedings
1.
Yankee Companies v. U.S. Department of Energy
DOE Phase I Damages - In 1998, the Yankee Companies (CYAPC, YAEC and MYAPC) filed separate complaints against the DOE in the Court of
Federal Claims seeking monetary damages resulting from the DOE’s failure to begin accepting spent nuclear fuel for disposal by January 31, 1998
pursuant to the terms of the 1983 spent fuel and high level waste disposal contracts between the Yankee Companies and the DOE (DOE Phase I
Damages). Phase I covered damages for the period 1998 through 2002. Following multiple appeals and cross-appeals in December 2012, the
judgment awarding CYAPC $39.6 million, YAEC $38.3 million and MYAPC $81.7 million became final.
In January 2013, the proceeds from the DOE Phase I Damages Claim were received by the Yankee Companies and transferred to each Yankee
Company’s respective decommissioning trust.
21
In June 2013, FERC approved CYAPC, YAEC and MYAPC to reduce rates in their wholesale power contracts through the application of the DOE
proceeds for the benefit of customers. Changes to the terms of the wholesale power contracts became effective on July 1, 2013. In accordance with
the FERC order, CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO began receiving the benefit of the DOE proceeds, and the benefits have been passed
on to customers.
On September 17, 2014, in accordance with the MYAPC’s three-year refund plan, MYAPC returned a portion of the DOE Phase I Damages proceeds
to the member companies, including CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH, and WMECO, in the amount of $3.2 million, $1.1 million, $1.4 million and
$0.8 million, respectively. On September 28, 2015, MYAPC returned the remaining DOE Phase I Damages proceeds to the member companies,
including CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH, and WMECO, in the amount of $2.3 million, $0.8 million, $1 million and $0.6 million, respectively.
DOE Phase II Damages - In December 2007, the Yankee Companies each filed subsequent lawsuits against the DOE seeking recovery of actual
damages incurred related to the alleged failure of the DOE to provide for a permanent facility to store spent nuclear fuel generated in years 2001
through 2008 for CYAPC and YAEC and from 2002 through 2008 for MYAPC (DOE Phase II Damages). In November 2013, the court issued a
final judgment awarding CYAPC $126.3 million, YAEC $73.3 million, and MYAPC $35.8 million. On January 14, 2014, the Yankee Companies
received a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice stating that the DOE will not appeal the court’s final judgment.
In March and April 2014, CYAPC, YAEC and MYAPC received payment of $126.3 million, $73.3 million and $35.8 million, respectively, of the
DOE Phase II Damages proceeds and made the required informational filing with FERC in accordance with the process and methodology outlined in
the 2013 FERC order. The Yankee Companies returned the DOE Phase II Damages proceeds to the member companies, including CL&P, NSTAR
Electric, PSNH, and WMECO, for the benefit of their respective customers, on June 1, 2014. Refunds to CL&P’s, NSTAR Electric’s, PSNH’s and
WMECO’s customers for these DOE proceeds began in the third quarter of 2014 and all refunds under these proceedings have been disbursed.
DOE Phase III Damages - In August 2013, the Yankee Companies each filed subsequent lawsuits against the DOE seeking recovery of actual
damages incurred in the years 2009 through 2012. The trial on this matter was held on June 30 and July 1, 2015, with a post-trial briefing that
concluded on October 14, 2015. The parties are awaiting a decision from the court.
2.
Conservation Law Foundation v. PSNH
On July 21, 2011, the Conservation Law Foundation (CLF) filed a citizens suit under the provisions of the federal Clean Air Act against PSNH
alleging permitting violations at the company’s Merrimack generating station. The suit alleges that PSNH failed to have proper permits for
replacement of the Unit 2 turbine at Merrimack, installation of activated carbon injection equipment for the unit, and violated a permit condition
concerning operation of the electrostatic precipitators at the station. On September 27, 2012, the federal court dismissed portions of CLF’s suit
pertaining to the installation of activated carbon injection and the electrostatic precipitators. CLF filed an amended complaint on May 28, 2013,
related to routine maintenance of the boiler performed in 2008 and 2009. The suit seeks injunctive relief, civil penalties, and costs. CLF has pursued
similar claims before the NHPUC, the N.H. Air Resources Council, and the N.H. Site Evaluation Committee, all of which have been denied. PSNH
continues to believe this suit is without merit and intends to defend it vigorously. However, at this time the case has been stayed while the State
settlement process related to the divestiture of generating assets, including Merrimack Station, continues.
3.
Other Legal Proceedings
For further discussion of legal proceedings, see Item 1, Business: “- Electric Distribution Segment,” “- Electric Transmission Segment,” and “-
Natural Gas Distribution Segment” for information about various state and federal regulatory and rate proceedings, civil lawsuits related thereto, and
information about proceedings relating to power, transmission and pricing issues; “- Nuclear Fuel Storage” for information related to high-level
nuclear waste; and “- Other Regulatory and Environmental Matters” for information about proceedings involving surface water and air quality
requirements, toxic substances and hazardous waste, electric and magnetic fields, licensing of hydroelectric projects, and other matters. In addition,
see Item 1A, Risk Factors, for general information about several significant risks.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The following table sets forth the executive officers of Eversource Energy as of February 16, 2016. All of the Company’s officers serve terms of one
year and until their successors are elected and qualified:
Name
Thomas J. May
James J. Judge
Leon J. Olivier
David R. McHale
Werner J. Schweiger
Gregory B. Butler
Christine M. Carmody*
Joseph R. Nolan, Jr.*
Jay S. Buth
Age
68
60
67
55
56
58
53
52
46
Title
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Executive Vice President-Enterprise Energy Strategy and Business Development
Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Senior Vice President and General Counsel
Senior Vice President-Human Resources of Eversource Service
Senior Vice President-Corporate Relations of Eversource Service
Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
22
*Deemed an executive officer of Eversource Energy pursuant to Rule 3b-7 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Thomas J. May. Mr. May has served as Chairman of the Board of Eversource Energy since October 10, 2013, and as President and Chief Executive
Officer and as a Trustee of Eversource Energy; as Chairman and a Director of CL&P, NSTAR Electric, NSTAR Gas, PSNH, WMECO and Yankee
Gas; and as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Eversource Service since April 10, 2012. Mr. May has served as a
Director of NSTAR Electric and NSTAR Gas since September 27, 1999. Mr. May previously served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer and a Trustee of NSTAR, and as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of NSTAR Electric and NSTAR Gas until April 10, 2012.
He served as Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and a Trustee since NSTAR was formed in 1999, and was elected President in 2002. Mr. May has
served as Chairman of the Board of Eversource Energy Foundation, Inc. since October 15, 2013, and as a Director of Eversource Energy Foundation,
Inc. since April 10, 2012. He previously served as President of Eversource Energy Foundation, Inc. from October 15, 2013 to September 29, 2014.
He has served as a Trustee of the NSTAR Foundation since August 18, 1987.
James J. Judge. Mr. Judge has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Eversource Energy, CL&P, NSTAR Electric,
NSTAR Gas, PSNH, WMECO, Yankee Gas and Eversource Service and as a Director of CL&P, PSNH, WMECO, Yankee Gas and Eversource
Service since April 10, 2012 and of NSTAR Electric and NSTAR Gas since September 27, 1999. Previously, Mr. Judge served as Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of NSTAR, NSTAR Electric and NSTAR Gas from 1999 until April 2012. Mr. Judge has served as Treasurer
and as a Director of Eversource Energy Foundation, Inc. since April 10, 2012. He has served as a Trustee of the NSTAR Foundation since
December 12, 1995.
Leon J. Olivier. Mr. Olivier has served as Executive Vice President-Enterprise Energy Strategy and Business Development of Eversource Energy
since September 2, 2014 and as a Director of Eversource Service since January 17, 2005. Mr. Olivier previously served as Executive Vice President
and Chief Operating Officer of Eversource Energy and Eversource Service from May 13, 2008 until September 2, 2014, and as Chief Executive
Officer of NSTAR Electric and NSTAR Gas from April 10, 2012 until August 11, 2014, of CL&P, PSNH, WMECO and Yankee Gas from
January 15, 2007 to September 29, 2014, and of CL&P from September 10, 2001 to September 29, 2014, and as a Director of NSTAR Electric and
NSTAR Gas from November 27, 2012 to September 29, 2014, of PSNH, WMECO and Yankee Gas from January 17, 2005 to September 29, 2014,
and of CL&P from September 10, 2001 to September 29, 2014. Previously, Mr. Olivier served as Executive Vice President-Operations of
Eversource Energy from February 13, 2007 to May 12, 2008. He has served as a Director of Eversource Energy Foundation, Inc. since April 1, 2006.
Mr. Olivier has served as a Trustee of the NSTAR Foundation since April 10, 2012.
David R. McHale. Mr. McHale has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer of Eversource Energy and Eversource
Service since April 10, 2012 and as a Director of Eversource Service since January 1, 2005. Mr. McHale previously served as Executive Vice
President and Chief Administrative Officer of CL&P, NSTAR Electric, NSTAR Gas, PSNH, WMECO and Yankee Gas from April 10, 2012 to
September 29, 2014 and as a Director of NSTAR Electric and NSTAR Gas from November 27, 2012 to September 29, 2014, of PSNH, WMECO and
Yankee Gas from January 1, 2005 to September 29, 2014, and of CL&P from January 15, 2007 to September 29, 2014. Previously, Mr. McHale
served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Eversource Energy, CL&P, PSNH, WMECO, Yankee Gas and Eversource Service
from January 2009 to April 2012, and as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Eversource Energy, CL&P, PSNH, WMECO, Yankee
Gas and Eversource Service from January 2005 to December 2008. He has served as a Director of Eversource Energy Foundation, Inc. since
January 1, 2005. Mr. McHale has served as a Trustee of the NSTAR Foundation since April 10, 2012.
Werner J. Schweiger. Mr. Schweiger has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Eversource Energy since September 2,
2014 and of Eversource Service since August 11, 2014, and as President of CL&P since June 2, 2015 and as Chief Executive Officer of CL&P,
NSTAR Electric, NSTAR Gas, PSNH, WMECO and Yankee Gas since August 11, 2014, and as a Director of Eversource Service, NSTAR Gas and
Yankee Gas since September 29, 2014 and of CL&P, PSNH, NSTAR Electric and WMECO since May 28, 2013. He previously served as President-
Electric Distribution of Eversource Service from January 16, 2013 until August 11, 2014 and as President of NSTAR Electric from April 10, 2012
until January 16, 2013 and as a Director of NSTAR Electric from November 27, 2012 to January 16, 2013. From February 27, 2002 until April 10,
2012, Mr. Schweiger was Senior Vice President-Operations of NSTAR Electric and NSTAR Gas. Mr. Schweiger has served as a Director of
Eversource Energy Foundation, Inc. since September 29, 2014. He has served as a Trustee of the NSTAR Foundation since September 29, 2014.
Gregory B. Butler. Mr. Butler has served as Senior Vice President and General Counsel of Eversource Energy since May 1, 2014, of NSTAR
Electric, and NSTAR Gas since April 10, 2012, and of CL&P, PSNH, WMECO, Yankee Gas and Eversource Service since March 9, 2006.
Mr. Butler has served as a Director of NSTAR Electric and NSTAR Gas since April 10, 2012, of Eversource Service since November 27, 2012, and
of CL&P, PSNH, WMECO and Yankee Gas since April 22, 2009. Mr. Butler previously served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and
Secretary of Eversource Energy from April 10, 2012 until May 1, 2014, and as Senior Vice President and General Counsel of Eversource Energy
from December 1, 2005 to April 10, 2012. He has served as a Director of Eversource Energy Foundation, Inc. since December 1, 2002. He has been
a Trustee of the NSTAR Foundation since April 10, 2012.
Christine M. Carmody. Ms. Carmody has served as Senior Vice President-Human Resources of Eversource Service since April 10, 2012 and as a
Director of Eversource Service since November 27, 2012. Ms. Carmody previously served as Senior Vice President-Human Resources of CL&P,
PSNH, WMECO and Yankee Gas from November 27, 2012 to September 29, 2014, and of NSTAR Electric and NSTAR Gas from August 1, 2008 to
September 29, 2014, and as a Director of CL&P, PSNH, WMECO and Yankee Gas from April 10, 2012 to September 29, 2014 and of NSTAR
Electric and NSTAR Gas from November 27, 2012 to September 29, 2014. Previously, Ms. Carmody served as Vice President-Organizational
Effectiveness of NSTAR, NSTAR Electric and NSTAR Gas from June 2006 to August 2008. Ms. Carmody has served as a Director of Eversource
Energy Foundation, Inc. since April 10, 2012. She has served as a Trustee of the NSTAR Foundation since August 1, 2008.
Joseph R. Nolan, Jr. Mr. Nolan has served as Senior Vice President-Corporate Relations of Eversource Service since April 10, 2012 and as a
Director of Eversource Service since November 27, 2012. Mr. Nolan previously served as Senior Vice President-Corporate Relations of NSTAR
Electric and NSTAR Gas from April 10, 2012 to September 29, 2014, and of CL&P, PSNH, WMECO and Yankee Gas from November 27, 2012 to
23
September 29, 2014, as a Director of CL&P, PSNH, WMECO and Yankee Gas from April 10, 2012 to September 29, 2014 and of NSTAR Electric
and NSTAR Gas from November 27, 2012 to September 29, 2014. Previously, Mr. Nolan served as Senior Vice President-Customer & Corporate
Relations of NSTAR, NSTAR Electric and NSTAR Gas from 2006 until April 10, 2012. Mr. Nolan has served as a Director of Eversource Energy
Foundation, Inc. since April 10, 2012, and has served as Executive Director of Eversource Energy Foundation, Inc. since October 15, 2013. He has
served as a Trustee of the NSTAR Foundation since October 1, 2000.
Jay S. Buth. Mr. Buth has served as Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of Eversource Energy, CL&P, NSTAR Electric,
NSTAR Gas, PSNH, WMECO, Yankee Gas and Eversource Service since April 10, 2012. Previously, Mr. Buth served as Vice President-
Accounting and Controller of Eversource Energy, CL&P, PSNH, WMECO, Yankee Gas and Eversource Service from June 2009 until April 10,
2012. From June 2006 through January 2009, Mr. Buth served as the Vice President and Controller for New Jersey Resources Corporation, an
energy services holding company that provides natural gas and wholesale energy services, including transportation, distribution and asset
management.
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrants’ Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
(a)
Market Information and (c) Dividends
Eversource. Our common shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange. The ticker symbol is “ES.” The high and low sales prices of our
common shares and the dividends declared, for the past two years, by quarter, are shown below.
Year
2015
2014
Quarter
High
Low
First
Second
Third
Fourth
First
Second
Third
Fourth
$
$
56.83
51.42
52.15
52.85
45.69
47.60
47.37
56.66
$
$
48.54
45.20
44.64
48.18
41.28
44.28
41.92
44.37
$
$
Dividends
Declared
0.4175
0.4175
0.4175
0.4175
0.3925
0.3925
0.3925
0.3925
Information with respect to dividend restrictions for us, CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH, and WMECO is contained in Item 7, Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, under the caption “Liquidity” and Item 8, Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data, in the Combined Notes to Financial Statements, within this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
There is no established public trading market for the common stock of CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO. All of the common stock of
CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO is held solely by Eversource.
Common stock dividends approved and paid to Eversource during the year were as follows:
(Millions of Dollars)
CL&P
NSTAR Electric
PSNH
WMECO
(b)
Holders
$
For the Years Ended December 31,
2014
2015
$
196.0
198.0
106.0
37.2
171.2
253.0
66.0
60.0
As of January 31, 2016, there were 42,493 registered common shareholders of our company on record. As of the same date, there were a total of
317,191,249 common shares issued.
(d)
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
For information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans, see Item 12, Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial
Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
24
(e)
Performance Graph
The performance graph below illustrates a five-year comparison of cumulative total returns based on an initial investment of $100 in 2010 in
Eversource Energy common stock, as compared with the S&P 500 Stock Index and the EEI Index for the period 2011 through 2015, assuming all
dividends are reinvested.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
The following table discloses purchases of our common shares made by us or on our behalf for the periods shown below. The common shares
purchased consist of open market purchases made by the Company or an independent agent. These share transactions related to shares awarded
under the Company’s Incentive Plan and Dividend Reinvestment Plan and matching contributions under the Eversource 401k Plan.
Period
October 1 - October 31, 2015
November 1 - November 30, 2015
December 1 - December 31, 2015
Total
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased
117,887
3,178
6,001
127,066
Average
Price Paid
per Share
50.33
50.76
51.17
50.38
$
$
Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans or
Programs
Approximate Dollar
Value of Shares that
May Yet Be Purchased
Under the Plans and
Programs (at month end)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
25
Item 6. Selected Consolidated Financial Data
Eversource Selected Consolidated Financial Data (Unaudited)
(Thousands of Dollars, except percentages and
common share information)
Balance Sheet Data:
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
Total Assets (b)
Total Capitalization (b) (c) (d)
Obligations Under Capital Leases (c)
Income Statement Data:
Operating Revenues
Net Income
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders
Common Share Data:
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders:
Basic Earnings Per Common Share
Diluted Earnings Per Common Share
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding:
Basic
Diluted
Dividends Declared Per Common Share
Market Price - Closing (high) (e)
Market Price - Closing (low) (e)
Market Price - Closing (end of year) (e)
Book Value Per Common Share (end of year)
Tangible Book Value Per Common Share (end of year) (f)
Rate of Return Earned on Average Common Equity (%) (g)
Market-to-Book Ratio (end of year) (h)
Capitalization:
Total Equity
Preferred Stock Not Subject to Mandatory Redemption
Long-Term Debt (b) (c) (d)
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2015
2014
2013
2012 (a)
2011
19,892,441 $
30,580,309
19,542,240
8,222
18,647,041 $
29,740,387
18,946,395
9,434
17,576,186 $
27,760,315
18,042,052
10,744
16,605,010 $
28,269,780
17,323,068
11,071
10,403,065
15,617,627
9,048,882
12,358
7,954,827 $
886,004
7,519
878,485 $
7,741,856 $
827,065
7,519
819,546 $
7,301,204 $
793,689
7,682
786,007 $
6,273,787 $
533,077
7,132
525,945 $
4,465,657
400,513
5,820
394,693
2.77 $
2.76 $
2.59 $
2.58 $
2.49 $
2.49 $
1.90 $
1.89 $
2.22
2.22
317,336,881
318,432,687
1.67 $
54.52 $
44.63 $
51.07 $
32.64 $
21.54 $
8.7
1.6
316,136,748
317,417,414
1.57 $
56.15 $
41.52 $
53.52 $
31.47 $
20.37 $
8.4
1.7
315,311,387
316,211,160
1.47 $
45.33 $
38.67 $
42.39 $
30.49 $
19.32 $
8.3
1.4
277,209,819
277,993,631
1.32 $
40.57 $
33.53 $
39.08 $
29.41 $
18.21 $
7.9
1.3
177,410,167
177,804,568
1.10
36.31
30.46
36.07
22.65
21.03
10.1
1.6
53 %
1
46
100 %
53 %
1
46
100 %
53 %
1
46
100 %
53 %
1
46
100 %
44 %
1
55
100 %
(a) The 2012 results include the operations of NSTAR beginning April 10, 2012.
(b)
The 2011 through 2014 amounts reflect reclassifications due to the adoption of new accounting guidance that changed the balance sheet presentation of debt
issuance costs. Unamortized debt issuance costs are now presented as a direct reduction from the carrying amount of the debt liability rather than as a deferred
cost. Prior year amounts were retrospectively adjusted to conform to the current year presentation. See Note 1C, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies –
Accounting Standards,” for further information.
(c) Includes portions due within one year.
(d) Excludes RRBs.
(e) Market price information reflects closing prices as reflected by the New York Stock Exchange.
(f) Common Shareholders’ Equity adjusted for goodwill and intangibles divided by total common shares outstanding.
(g) Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders divided by average Common Shareholders’ Equity.
(h) The closing market price divided by the book value per share.
See the Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a description of any accounting changes materially affecting
the comparability of the information reflected in the tables above.
26
Eversource Selected Consolidated Sales Statistics
2015
2014
2013
2012 (a)
2011
Revenues: (Thousands)
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Wholesale
Other and Eliminations
Total Electric
Natural Gas
Total - Regulated Companies
Other and Eliminations
Total
$
$
3,608,155 $
2,476,686
326,564
411,749
110,013
6,933,167
993,662
7,926,829
27,998
7,954,827 $
3,288,313 $
2,471,440
348,698
447,899
97,090
6,653,440
1,002,880
7,656,320
85,536
7,741,856 $
3,073,181 $
2,387,535
339,917
486,515
56,547
6,343,695
855,601
7,199,296
101,908
7,301,204 $
2,731,951 $
1,604,661
753,974
357,223
130,137
5,577,946
572,857
6,150,803
122,984
6,273,787 $
Regulated Companies - Sales Volumes:
Electric (GWh)
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Wholesale
Total Electric
Natural Gas (million cubic feet)
Regulated Companies - Customers: (Average)
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Total Electric
Natural Gas
Total - Regulated Companies
21,441
27,598
5,577
3,215
57,831
102,999
21,317
27,449
5,676
3,018
57,460
104,191
21,896
27,787
5,648
855
56,186
98,258
19,719
24,537
5,462
2,154
51,872
69,894
2,747,679
374,552
7,868
3,130,099
506,175
3,636,274
2,734,047
373,511
8,016
3,115,574
499,186
3,614,760
2,718,727
371,897
8,109
3,098,733
493,563
3,592,296
2,711,407
370,389
8,279
3,090,075
483,770
3,573,845
1,710,342
199,240
7,083
1,916,665
207,753
2,124,418
2,091,270
1,236,374
252,878
350,413
47,485
3,978,420
430,799
4,409,219
56,438
4,465,657
14,766
14,628
4,418
1,020
34,832
46,880
(a) The 2012 results include the operations of NSTAR beginning April 10, 2012.
CL&P Selected Financial Data (Unaudited) and CL&P Selected Sales Statistics have been omitted from this report but are set forth in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2015 filed with the SEC on a combined basis with Eversource Energy on February 26, 2016. Such report is
also available in the Investors section at www.eversource.com.
27
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
EVERSOURCE ENERGY AND SUBSIDIARIES
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related combined notes included
in this combined Annual Report on Form 10-K. References in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to “Eversource,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and
“our” refer to Eversource Energy and its consolidated subsidiaries. All per share amounts are reported on a diluted basis. The consolidated financial
statements of Eversource, NSTAR Electric and PSNH and the financial statements of CL&P and WMECO are herein collectively referred to as the
“financial statements.”
On April 30, 2015, the Company’s legal name was changed from Northeast Utilities to Eversource Energy. CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and
WMECO are each doing business as Eversource Energy.
Refer to the Glossary of Terms included in this combined Annual Report on Form 10-K for abbreviations and acronyms used throughout this
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The only common equity securities that are publicly traded are common shares of Eversource. The earnings and EPS of each business discussed
below do not represent a direct legal interest in the assets and liabilities of such business but rather represent a direct interest in our assets and
liabilities as a whole. EPS by business is a financial measure not recognized under GAAP that is calculated by dividing the Net Income Attributable
to Common Shareholders of each business by the weighted average diluted Eversource common shares outstanding for the period. The discussion
below also includes non-GAAP financial measures referencing our 2015, 2014 and 2013 earnings and EPS excluding certain integration costs
incurred by Eversource parent and our Regulated companies. We use these non-GAAP financial measures to evaluate and to provide details of
earnings by business and to more fully compare and explain our 2015, 2014 and 2013 results without including the impact of these items. Due to the
nature and significance of these items on Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders, we believe that the non-GAAP presentation is more
representative of our financial performance and provides additional and useful information to readers of this report in analyzing historical and future
performance by business. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered as an alternative to reported Net Income Attributable to
Common Shareholders or EPS determined in accordance with GAAP as an indicator of operating performance.
Reconciliations of the above non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures of consolidated diluted EPS and Net
Income Attributable to Common Shareholders are included under “Financial Condition and Business Analysis – Overview – Consolidated” and
“Financial Condition and Business Analysis – Overview – Regulated Companies” in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations, herein.
Financial Condition and Business Analysis
Executive Summary
Results:
•
We earned $878.5 million, or $2.76 per share, in 2015, compared with $819.5 million, or $2.58 per share, in 2014. Excluding integration
costs, we earned $894.3 million, or $2.81 per share, in 2015 and $841.6 million, or $2.65 per share, in 2014.
•
Our electric distribution segment, which includes generation, earned $507.9 million, or $1.59 per share, in 2015, compared with $462.4
million, or $1.45 per share, in 2014. Our electric transmission segment earned $304.5 million, or $0.96 per share, in 2015, compared with
$295.4 million, or $0.93 per share, in 2014. Our natural gas distribution segment earned $72.4 million, or $0.23 per share, in 2015,
compared with $72.3 million, or $0.23 per share, in 2014. The 2015 electric and natural gas distribution results exclude $0.8 million of
after-tax integration costs.
•
Eversource parent and other companies earned $9.5 million, or $0.03 per share, in 2015, compared with $11.5 million, or $0.04 per share,
in 2014. The 2015 and 2014 results exclude $15 million, or $0.05 per share, and $22.1 million, or $0.07 per share, respectively, of after-tax
integration costs.
Liquidity:
•
Cash flows provided by operating activities totaled $1.4 billion in 2015, compared with $1.6 billion in 2014. Investments in property, plant
and equipment totaled $1.7 billion in 2015 and $1.6 billion in 2014. Cash and cash equivalents totaled $23.9 million as of December 31,
2015, compared with $38.7 million as of December 31, 2014.
•
•
In 2015, we issued approximately $1.23 billion of new long-term debt consisting of $450 million by Eversource parent, $350 million by
CL&P, $250 million by NSTAR Electric, $100 million by NSTAR Gas, and $75 million by Yankee Gas. In 2015, we repaid $212 million
of existing long-term debt consisting of $162 million by CL&P and $50 million by WMECO.
In 2015, we paid cash dividends on common shares of $529.8 million, compared with $475.2 million in 2014. On February 3, 2016, our
Board of Trustees approved a common share dividend payment of $0.445 per share, payable on March 31, 2016 to shareholders of record
as of March 2, 2016. The 2016 dividend represented an increase of 6.6 percent over the dividend paid in December 2015, and is the
equivalent to dividends on common shares of approximately $565 million on an annual basis.
28
•
We project to make capital expenditures of approximately $9.2 billion from 2016 through 2019. Of the $9.2 billion, we expect to invest
approximately $4.9 billion in our electric and natural gas distribution segments and $3.9 billion in our electric transmission segment. In
addition, we project to invest approximately $0.4 billion in information technology and facilities upgrades and enhancements. These
projections do not include capital investments related to Access Northeast or Clean Energy Connect.
Strategic, Legislative, Regulatory, Policy and Other Items:
•
On December 18, 2015, the New Hampshire Site Evaluation Committee (NH SEC) accepted NPT’s application as complete allowing the
formal siting process to move forward. The project is expected to be operational in the first half of 2019. On January 28, 2016, NPT bid
into the three-state Clean Energy RFP process.
•
The Clean Energy Connect Project is a planned transmission, wind and hydro generation project that we plan to co-develop with
experienced renewable generation companies. On January 28, 2016, the Clean Energy Connect project was bid into the three-state Clean
Energy RFP process. Our investment, should the Clean Energy Connect Project be selected in the RFP process, is currently estimated to be
at least $400 million and will consist of the Massachusetts portion of a new 25-mile, 345 kV transmission line with a 600 MW capacity.
•
On January 28, 2016, the DPU approved NSTAR Electric’s, WMECO’s, and NSTAR Gas’ three-year electric and natural gas energy
efficiency plan, which was jointly developed with other Massachusetts electric distribution companies (EDCs) and natural gas distribution
companies. On December 31, 2015, DEEP approved CL&P’s and Yankee Gas’ three-year electric and natural gas C&LM plan, which was
jointly developed with other Connecticut EDCs and natural gas distribution companies. These electric and natural gas energy efficiency
and C&LM plans include the ability to earn performance incentives as well as recover LBR for NSTAR Electric until it is operating under
a decoupled rate structure.
•
On January 7, 2015, the DPU issued an order concluding that NSTAR Electric had removed energy-related bad debt costs from base
distribution rates effective January 1, 2006. As a result of the DPU order, in the first quarter of 2015 NSTAR Electric increased its
regulatory assets and reduced its operations and maintenance expense by $24.2 million for energy-related bad debt costs through 2014,
resulting in after-tax earnings of $14.5 million. NSTAR Electric filed for recovery of the energy-related bad debt costs regulatory asset
from customers and on November 20, 2015, the DPU approved NSTAR Electric’s proposed rate increase to recover these costs over a 12-
month period, beginning January 1, 2016.
Overview
Consolidated: A summary of our earnings by business, which also reconciles the non-GAAP financial measures of consolidated non-GAAP earnings
and EPS, as well as EPS by business, to the most directly comparable GAAP measures of consolidated Net Income Attributable to Common
Shareholders and diluted EPS, is as follows:
(Millions of Dollars, Except Per Share Amounts)
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders (GAAP)
Regulated Companies
Eversource Parent and Other Companies
Non-GAAP Earnings
Integration Costs (after-tax)
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders (GAAP)
$
$
$
2015
For the Years Ended December 31,
2014
2013
Amount
Per Share
Amount
Per Share
Amount
Per Share
878.5 $
2.76 $
819.5 $
2.58 $
786.0 $
2.49
884.8 $
9.5
894.3
(15.8)
878.5 $
2.78 $
0.03
2.81
(0.05)
2.76 $
830.1 $
11.5
841.6
(22.1)
819.5 $
2.61 $
0.04
2.65
(0.07)
2.58 $
774.9 $
24.9
799.8
(13.8)
786.0 $
2.45
0.08
2.53
(0.04)
2.49
The 2015 and 2014 integration costs are associated with our branding efforts and severance costs.
Regulated Companies: Our Regulated companies consist of the electric distribution, electric transmission, and natural gas distribution segments.
Generation activities of PSNH and WMECO are included in our electric distribution segment. A summary of our segment earnings and EPS is as
follows:
(Millions of Dollars, Except Per Share Amounts)
Electric Distribution
Electric Transmission
Natural Gas Distribution
Non-GAAP Earnings
Integration Costs (after-tax)
Net Income - Regulated Companies
2015
For the Years Ended December 31,
2014
2013
Amount
Per Share
Amount
Per Share
Amount
Per Share
$
$
507.9 $
304.5
72.4
884.8
(0.8)
884.0 $
1.59 $
0.96
0.23
2.78
-
2.78 $
462.4 $
295.4
72.3
830.1
-
830.1 $
1.45 $
0.93
0.23
2.61
-
2.61 $
427.0 $
287.0
60.9
774.9
-
774.9 $
1.35
0.91
0.19
2.45
-
2.45
The 2015 Regulated companies’ integration costs include severance in connection with cost saving initiatives.
29
Excluding integration costs, our electric distribution segment earnings increased $45.5 million in 2015, as compared to 2014, due primarily to the
impact of the December 1, 2014 CL&P base distribution rate increase, the $27.5 million favorable earnings impact related to the resolution of
NSTAR Electric’s basic service bad debt adder and the settlement with the Massachusetts Attorney General on eleven open dockets covering the
CPSL program filings and the recovery of LBR related to 2009 through 2011 energy efficiency programs at NSTAR Electric, an increase in the
recovery of LBR at NSTAR Electric related to 2015 energy efficiency programs, and higher retail sales volumes at NSTAR Electric and PSNH.
Partially offsetting these favorable earnings impacts were a higher effective tax rate in 2015, higher property taxes, higher depreciation expense and a
$5 million contribution in 2015 to create a clean energy fund in connection with the PSNH divestiture agreement.
Our electric transmission segment earnings increased $9.1 million in 2015, as compared to 2014, due primarily to the result of lower reserve charges
associated with the FERC ROE complaint proceedings of $12.4 million recorded in 2015, as compared to $22.4 million recorded in 2014, and a
higher transmission rate base as a result of an increased investment in our transmission infrastructure. These favorable earnings impacts were
partially offset by a higher effective tax rate in 2015.
Our natural gas distribution segment earnings increased $0.1 million in 2015, as compared to 2014. Our natural gas distribution segment earnings
were favorably impacted by a decrease in operations and maintenance costs primarily attributable to lower employee-related expenses, a lower
effective tax rate in 2015, and additional natural gas heating customers. These favorable earnings impacts were offset by a decrease in firm natural
gas sales volumes driven by record warm weather in the fourth quarter of 2015, as compared to 2014, higher depreciation expense and higher
property taxes.
Eversource Parent and Other Companies: Excluding the impact of integration costs, Eversource parent and other companies had earnings of $9.5
million in 2015, compared with earnings of $11.5 million in 2014. The earnings decrease was due primarily to a higher effective tax rate at
Eversource parent in 2015, as compared to 2014, higher interest expense at Eversource parent as a result of new debt issuances in January 2015, and
reduced earnings in 2015 from Eversource’s unregulated electrical contracting business, which was sold in April 2015. These unfavorable earnings
impacts were partially offset by a reduction in operations and maintenance costs.
Electric and Natural Gas Sales Volumes: Weather, fluctuations in energy supply costs, conservation measures (including utility-sponsored energy
efficiency programs), and economic conditions affect customer energy usage. Industrial sales volumes are less sensitive to temperature variations
than residential and commercial sales volumes. In our service territories, weather impacts electric sales volumes during the summer and both electric
and natural gas sales volumes during the winter; however, natural gas sales volumes are more sensitive to temperature variations than are electric
sales volumes. Customer heating or cooling usage may not directly correlate with historical levels or with the level of degree-days that occur.
Fluctuations in retail electric sales volumes at NSTAR Electric and PSNH impact earnings (“Traditional” in the table below). For CL&P (effective
December 1, 2014) and WMECO, fluctuations in retail electric sales volumes do not impact earnings due to their respective regulatory commission
approved revenue decoupling mechanisms (“Decoupled” in the table below). These distribution revenues are decoupled from their customer sales
volumes, which breaks the relationship between sales volumes and revenues recognized. CL&P and WMECO reconcile their annual base
distribution rate recovery amounts to their respective pre-established levels of baseline distribution delivery service revenues. Any difference
between the allowed level of distribution revenue and the actual amount incurred during a 12-month period is adjusted through rates in the following
period.
A summary of our retail electric GWh sales volumes and our firm natural gas sales volumes in million cubic feet and percentage changes is as
follows:
Electric
Traditional:
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Total - Traditional
Decoupled:
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Total - Decoupled
Total Sales Volumes
Firm Natural Gas
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Total Sales Volumes
Total, Net of Special Contracts (1)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 Compared to 2014
Percentage
Increase/(Decrease)
Sales Volumes (GWh)
2015
2014
9,882
16,486
2,614
28,982
11,559
11,112
2,963
25,634
54,616
9,798
16,340
2,673
28,811
11,519
11,109
3,003
25,631
54,442
0.9%
0.9%
(2.2)%
0.6%
0.3%
- %
(1.3)%
- %
0.3%
2014
2015
For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 Compared to 2014
Sales Volumes (million cubic feet)
Percentage
Increase/(Decrease)
(1.3)%
0.1 %
(3.2)%
(1.1)%
(1.0)%
38,969
42,977
22,245
104,191
99,500
38,455
43,006
21,538
102,999
98,458
(1) Special contracts are unique to the natural gas distribution customers who take service under such an arrangement and generally specify the amount of distribution
revenue to be paid to Yankee Gas regardless of the customers’ usage.
30
Our 2015 retail electric sales volumes at our electric utilities with a traditional rate structure (NSTAR Electric and PSNH) were slightly higher, as
compared to 2014, due primarily to the impact of colder winter weather experienced in the first quarter of 2015 and warmer weather in the third
quarter of 2015, partially offset by milder winter weather in the fourth quarter of 2015 throughout those service territories. In 2015, heating degree
days were 1 percent lower in the Boston metropolitan area, and 5 percent lower in New Hampshire, as compared to 2014. Cooling degree days in
2015 were 19 percent higher in the Boston metropolitan area and 57 percent higher in New Hampshire, as compared to 2014. Weather-normalized
retail electric sales volumes were relatively unchanged in 2015, as compared to 2014. Improved economic conditions were offset by an increase in
customer conservation efforts resulting from company-sponsored energy efficiency programs.
Our firm natural gas sales volumes are subject to many of the same influences as our retail electric sales volumes. In addition, they have benefited
from customer growth in both of our natural gas distribution companies. In 2015, consolidated firm natural gas sales volumes were lower, as
compared to 2014. The 2015 firm natural gas sales volumes were negatively impacted by record warm weather in the fourth quarter of 2015, when
compared to 2014, partially offset by colder winter weather in the first quarter of 2015, as compared to 2014, throughout our natural gas service
territories. Weather-normalized Eversource consolidated firm natural gas sales volumes increased 2.5 percent in 2015, as compared to 2014, due
primarily to improved economic conditions as well as residential and commercial customer growth, partially offset by customer conservation efforts
resulting from company-sponsored energy efficiency programs. On October 30, 2015, the DPU issued its order in the NSTAR Gas distribution rate
case, which included the establishment of a revenue decoupling mechanism beginning January 1, 2016.
Prior to December 1, 2014, CL&P earned LBR related to reductions in sales volume as a result of successful energy efficiency programs. LBR was
recovered from retail customers through the FMCC. Effective December 1, 2014, CL&P no longer earns LBR due to its revenue decoupling
mechanism. NSTAR Electric recognized LBR of $60.6 million in 2015 and $39.9 million in 2014. On January 28, 2016, NSTAR Electric received
approval of a three-year energy efficiency plan, which includes recovery of LBR until it is operating under a decoupled rate structure.
For further information, see “Regulatory Developments and Rate Matters - Massachusetts - NSTAR Electric, WMECO and NSTAR Gas Energy
Efficiency Plan” and “Regulatory Developments and Rate Matters - Massachusetts - NSTAR Gas Distribution Rates” in this Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations.
Future Outlook
2016 EPS Guidance: We currently project 2016 earnings of between $2.90 per diluted share and $3.05 per diluted share.
Liquidity
Consolidated: Cash and cash equivalents totaled $23.9 million as of December 31, 2015, compared with $38.7 million as of December 31, 2014.
Long-Term Debt Issuances and Repayments: On January 15, 2015, Eversource parent issued $150 million of 1.60 percent Series G Senior Notes,
due to mature in 2018, and $300 million of 3.15 percent Series H Senior Notes, due to mature in 2025.
On May 20, 2015 and December 1, 2015, CL&P issued $300 million and $50 million, respectively, of 4.15 percent 2015 Series A First and
Refunding Mortgage Bonds due to mature in 2045.
On September 10, 2015, Yankee Gas issued $75 million of 3.35 percent 2015 Series M First Mortgage Bonds due to mature in 2025.
On November 18, 2015, NSTAR Electric issued $250 million of 3.25 percent debentures, due to mature in 2025.
On December 8, 2015, NSTAR Gas issued $100 million of 4.35 percent Series O First Mortgage Bonds due to mature in 2045.
The proceeds of all debt issuances, net of issuance costs, were used to repay short-term borrowings and fund capital expenditures and working
capital.
On April 1, 2015, CL&P repaid at maturity the $100 million 5.00 percent 2005 Series A First and Refunding Mortgage Bonds and also redeemed the
$62 million 1996A Series 1.55 percent PCRBs that were subject to mandatory tender, using short term borrowings.
On August 3, 2015, WMECO repaid at maturity the $50 million 5.24 percent Series C Senior Notes, using short-term borrowings.
Long-Term Debt Issuance Authorizations: On November 25, 2015, PURA approved Yankee Gas’ request to extend the authorization period for
issuance of up to $125 million in long-term debt from December 31, 2015 to December 31, 2016. On December 4, 2015, the DPU authorized
WMECO to issue up to $100 million in long-term debt for the period through December 31, 2016. On December 4, 2015, the DPU approved
NSTAR Electric’s request to extend the authorization period for issuance of up to $250 million in long-term debt from December 31, 2015 to
December 31, 2016.
Credit Agreements and Commercial Paper Programs: Eversource parent, CL&P, PSNH, WMECO, NSTAR Gas and Yankee Gas are parties to a
five-year $1.45 billion revolving credit facility. On October 26, 2015, this revolving credit facility was amended and restated and the termination
date was extended to September 4, 2020. Under the revolving credit facility, CL&P has a borrowing sublimit of $600 million, and PSNH and
WMECO each have borrowing sublimits of $300 million. The revolving credit facility serves to backstop Eversource parent’s $1.45 billion
commercial paper program. The commercial paper program allows Eversource parent to issue commercial paper as a form of short-term debt. As of
December 31, 2015 and 2014, Eversource parent had approximately $1.1 billion in short-term borrowings outstanding on each date under the
31
Eversource parent commercial paper program, leaving $351.5 million and $348.9 million of available borrowing capacity as of December 31, 2015
and 2014, respectively. The weighted-average interest rate on these borrowings as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 was 0.72 percent and 0.43
percent, respectively. As of December 31, 2015, there were intercompany loans from Eversource parent of $277.4 million to CL&P, $231.3 million
to PSNH and $143.4 million to WMECO. As of December 31, 2014, there were intercompany loans from Eversource parent of $133.4 million to
CL&P, $90.5 million to PSNH and $21.4 million to WMECO.
NSTAR Electric has a five-year $450 million revolving credit facility. On October 26, 2015, this revolving credit facility was amended and restated
and the termination date was extended to September 4, 2020. The facility serves to backstop NSTAR Electric’s $450 million commercial paper
program. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, NSTAR Electric had $62.5 million and $302 million, respectively, in short-term borrowings
outstanding under its commercial paper program, leaving $387.5 million and $148 million of available borrowing capacity as of December 31, 2015
and 2014, respectively. The weighted-average interest rate on these borrowings as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 was 0.40 percent and 0.27
percent, respectively.
Cash Flows: Cash flows provided by operating activities totaled $1.4 billion in 2015, compared with $1.6 billion in 2014. The decrease in operating
cash flows in 2015 compared to 2014 was due primarily to the $302 million payment made to fully satisfy the obligation with the DOE, as discussed
below, and an increase in purchased power and congestion costs at NSTAR Electric, WMECO and CL&P that will be recovered in future periods.
Also contributing to the decrease in operating cash flows were DOE Damages proceeds received from the Yankee Companies of $4.7 million in
2015, compared to $132 million in 2014. Partially offsetting these unfavorable cash flow impacts were a decrease of $49.2 million in Pension and
PBOP Plan cash contributions in 2015, as compared to 2014, and lower federal income tax payments of approximately $324 million in 2015, as
compared to 2014, primarily due to the extension of the accelerated depreciation deduction.
In late 2015, CL&P and WMECO made payments of $244.6 million and $57.4 million, respectively, to fully satisfy their obligations with the DOE,
which were classified as long-term debt on the balance sheets as of December 31, 2014, for costs associated with the disposal of spent nuclear fuel
and high-level radioactive waste for all periods prior to 1983 from their previous ownership interest in the Millstone nuclear power station. CL&P
and WMECO divested their ownership interest in Millstone in 2001. These payments included accumulated interest of $178 million and $41.8
million for CL&P and WMECO, respectively. CL&P funded its payment with the issuance of debt, and WMECO liquidated its spent nuclear fuel
trust to satisfy its obligation with the DOE.
On December 18, 2015, the “Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes” Act became law, which extended the accelerated deduction of depreciation to
businesses from 2015 through 2019. This extended stimulus provides us with cash flow benefits in 2016 of approximately $275 million (including
approximately $105 million for CL&P) due to a refund of taxes paid in 2015 and lower expected tax payments in 2016 of approximately $300
million.
In 2015, we paid cash dividends of $529.8 million, or $1.67 per common share, compared with $475.2 million, or $1.57 per share in 2014. Our
quarterly common share dividend payment was $0.4175 per share, in 2015, as compared to $0.3925 per share, in 2014. On February 3, 2016, our
Board of Trustees approved a common share dividend payment of $0.445 per share, payable on March 31, 2016 to shareholders of record as of
March 2, 2016. The 2016 dividend represented an increase of 6.6 percent over the dividend paid in December 2015, and is equivalent to dividends
on common shares of approximately $565 million on an annual basis.
In 2015, CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH, and WMECO paid $196 million, $198 million, $106 million, and $37.2 million, respectively, in common
stock dividends to Eversource parent.
Investments in Property, Plant and Equipment on the statements of cash flows do not include amounts incurred on capital projects but not yet paid,
cost of removal, AFUDC related to equity funds, and the capitalized portions of pension expense. In 2015, investments for Eversource, CL&P,
NSTAR Electric, PSNH, and WMECO were $1.7 billion, $523.8 million, $469.5 million, $308 million, and $134.6 million, respectively.
Each of Eversource, CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO use its available capital resources to fund its respective construction expenditures,
meet debt requirements, pay operating costs, including storm-related costs, pay dividends and fund other corporate obligations, such as pension
contributions. The current growth in Eversource’s construction expenditures utilizes a significant amount of cash for projects that have a long-term
return on investment and recovery period. In addition, Eversource’s Regulated companies recover their electric and natural gas distribution
construction expenditures as the related project costs are depreciated over the life of the assets. This impacts the timing of the revenue stream
designed to fully recover the total investment plus a return on the equity and debt used to finance the investments. These factors have resulted in
current liabilities exceeding current assets by approximately $371 million and $82 million at Eversource and WMECO, respectively, as of
December 31, 2015.
As of December 31, 2015, a total of $200 million of Eversource’s long-term debt classified as current liabilities, all at NSTAR Electric, will be paid
in the next 12 months. The remaining $28.9 million of Eversource’s long-term debt classified as current liabilities relates to fair value adjustments
from the merger that will be amortized in the next 12 months and have no cash flow impact. Eversource, with its strong credit ratings, has several
options available in the financial markets to repay or refinance these maturities with the issuance of new long-term debt. Eversource, CL&P,
NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO will reduce their short-term borrowings with operating cash flows or with the issuance of new long-term debt,
determined by considering capital requirements and maintenance of Eversource’s credit rating and profile. We expect the future operating cash flows
of Eversource, CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO, along with the access to financial markets, will be sufficient to meet any future
operating requirements and capital investment forecasted opportunities.
32
Credit Ratings: On April 23, 2015, S&P upgraded the corporate credit ratings by one level and changed the outlooks to stable from positive of
Eversource parent, CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH, WMECO, Yankee Gas and NSTAR Gas. On May 19, 2015, Moody’s changed the outlooks of
PSNH and WMECO to positive from stable and affirmed their corporate credit ratings. On June 2, 2015, Fitch changed the outlooks to positive from
stable of CL&P, PSNH and WMECO and affirmed its corporate credit ratings of Eversource parent, CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH, WMECO and
NSTAR Gas.
A summary of our corporate credit ratings and outlooks by Moody’s, S&P and Fitch is as follows:
Moody’s
S&P
Fitch
Eversource Parent
CL&P
NSTAR Electric
PSNH
WMECO
Current
Baa1
Baa1
A2
Baa1
A3
Outlook
Stable
Stable
Stable
Positive
Positive
Current
A
A
A
A
A
Outlook
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Current
BBB+
BBB+
A
BBB+
BBB+
Outlook
Stable
Positive
Stable
Positive
Positive
A summary of the current credit ratings and outlooks by Moody’s, S&P and Fitch for senior unsecured debt of Eversource parent, NSTAR Electric,
and WMECO and senior secured debt of CL&P and PSNH is as follows:
Moody’s
S&P
Fitch
Eversource Parent
CL&P
NSTAR Electric
PSNH
WMECO
Current
Baa1
A2
A2
A2
A3
Outlook
Stable
Stable
Stable
Positive
Positive
Current
A-
A+
A
A+
A
Outlook
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Current
BBB+
A
A+
A
A-
Outlook
Stable
Positive
Stable
Positive
Positive
Business Development and Capital Expenditures
Our consolidated capital expenditures, including amounts incurred but not paid, cost of removal, AFUDC, and the capitalized portions of pension
expense (all of which are non-cash factors), totaled $1.9 billion in 2015, $1.7 billion in 2014, and $1.6 billion in 2013. These amounts included $102
million in 2015, $58.3 million in 2014, and $44.7 million in 2013 related to information technology and facilities upgrades and enhancements,
primarily at Eversource Service and The Rocky River Realty Company.
Natural Gas Transmission Business:
Access Northeast: Access Northeast is a natural gas pipeline and storage project (the “Project”) being developed jointly by Eversource, Spectra
Energy Corp and National Grid. Access Northeast will enhance the Algonquin and Maritimes & Northeast pipeline systems using existing routes and
will include two new LNG storage tanks and liquefaction and vaporization facilities in Acushnet, Massachusetts that will be connected to the
Algonquin gas pipeline. The Project is expected to be capable of delivering approximately 900 million cubic feet of additional natural gas per day to
New England on peak demand days. Eversource and Spectra Energy Corp each own a 40 percent interest in the Project, with the remaining 20
percent interest owned by National Grid. The total projected cost for both the pipeline and the LNG storage is expected to be approximately $3
billion with anticipated in-service dates commencing in November 2018. The Project is subject to FERC and other federal and state regulatory
approvals. On November 17, 2015, the FERC accepted the Project’s request to initiate the pre-filing review process. Upon completion of the pre-
filing review, a certificate application will be filed with the FERC. In late 2015, the Project bid into the New England Natural Gas Pipeline Capacity
RFP conducted by certain EDCs in Massachusetts and Rhode Island, including NSTAR Electric and WMECO in Massachusetts, and in December
2015 and January 2016, those Massachusetts EDCs filed with the DPU seeking approval of the contracts for pipeline and storage capacity with the
Project. We expect the Rhode Island EDC to file its selected contracts with the Rhode Island regulatory agencies in the first half of 2016. In
February 2016, PSNH filed for approval with the NHPUC, its proposed contract for natural gas pipeline capacity and storage with the Project. For
further information on the RFP process, see “Regulatory Developments and Rate Matters – General – New England Natural Gas Pipeline Capacity”
in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations.
Electric Transmission Business: Our consolidated electric transmission business capital expenditures increased by $106 million in 2015, as
compared to 2014. A summary of electric transmission capital expenditures by company is as follows:
(Millions of Dollars)
CL&P
NSTAR Electric
PSNH
WMECO
NPT
Total Electric Transmission Segment
$
$
2015
For the Years Ended December 31,
2014
2013
252.9
238.2
161.2
116.0
38.3
806.6
$
$
259.2
223.8
120.8
68.5
28.3
700.6
$
$
211.9
220.8
99.7
87.2
39.9
659.5
33
NEEWS: The Interstate Reliability Project (IRP), the second project within the NEEWS family of projects, was fully energized on December 18,
2015. The project involved CL&P’s construction of an approximately 40-mile, 345-kV overhead line from Lebanon, Connecticut to the Connecticut-
Rhode Island border where it connects to transmission enhancements constructed by National Grid in Rhode Island. IRP was placed in service in
December 2015 at a final cost to CL&P of $192.6 million. Through December 31, 2015, CL&P and WMECO capitalized $377.9 million and $570.6
million, respectively, in costs associated with NEEWS.
GHCC: The Greater Hartford Central Connecticut (GHCC) solutions are comprised of 27 projects and are expected to cost approximately $350
million and be placed in service from 2016 through 2018. ISO-NE posted the final Solutions Study for GHCC in late February 2015 and approved
our Proposed Plan Applications on April 16, 2015. Through December 31, 2015, we have filed siting applications for five projects all of which have
been approved by the Connecticut Siting Council. During 2016, fifteen projects are expected to be in active construction, and three additional siting
applications are expected to be filed. All GHCC projects are expected to be completed by late 2018. As of December 31, 2015, CL&P had
capitalized $50.6 million in costs associated with GHCC.
Northern Pass: Northern Pass is Eversource’s planned HVDC transmission line from the Québec-New Hampshire border to Franklin, New
Hampshire and an associated alternating current radial transmission line between Franklin and Deerfield, New Hampshire. Northern Pass will
interconnect at the Québec-New Hampshire border with a planned HQ HVDC transmission line. On July 21, 2015, the DOE issued the draft
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for Northern Pass representing a key milestone in the permitting process. On August 18, 2015, a revised
route was announced with an additional 52 miles of the route underground in and around the White Mountain National Forest region. As a result, the
NPT project cost estimate increased from $1.4 billion to $1.6 billion. Concurrently, NPT announced the Forward NH Plan, which is a commitment
to allocate $200 million to projects associated with economic development, community betterment, and clean energy innovations to benefit the state
of New Hampshire. This commitment is contingent upon the Northern Pass transmission line going into commercial operation.
On October 19, 2015, NPT filed its NH SEC application, which was accepted as complete by the NH SEC on December 18, 2015, allowing the
formal siting process to move forward. In response to requests by the New Hampshire congressional delegation, the DOE announced that it would
issue a supplement to the draft EIS. Public hearings on the draft EIS will be held in March 2016. The DOE has asked for comments by April 4,
2016. The project is expected to be operational in the first half of 2019. On January 28, 2016, NPT bid into the three-state Clean Energy RFP
process. For further information on the RFP process, see “Regulatory Developments and Rate Matters – General – Clean Energy RFP” in this
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations.
Clean Energy Connect: The Clean Energy Connect project is a planned transmission, wind and hydro generation project that we plan to co-develop
with experienced renewable generation companies. On January 28, 2016, the Clean Energy Connect project was bid into the three-state Clean
Energy RFP process. Our investment, should the Clean Energy Connect Project be selected in the RFP process, is currently estimated to be at least
$400 million, and would involve the construction of a new 25-mile, 345kV transmission line with a 600 MW capacity from western Massachusetts to
eastern New York.
Greater Boston Reliability Solutions: In February 2015, ISO-NE selected Eversource’s and National Grid’s proposed Greater Boston and New
Hampshire Solution (Solution) to satisfy the requirements identified in the Greater Boston study. The Solution consists of a portfolio of electric
transmission upgrades straddling southern New Hampshire and northern Massachusetts in the Merrimack Valley and continuing into the greater
Boston metropolitan area. We are pursuing the necessary regulatory approvals and have filed several siting applications in Massachusetts and New
Hampshire. We estimate our portion of the investment in the Solution will be $544 million.
34
Distribution Business: A summary of distribution capital expenditures by company is as follows:
(Millions of Dollars)
CL&P:
Basic Business
Aging Infrastructure
Load Growth
Total CL&P
NSTAR Electric:
Basic Business
Aging Infrastructure
Load Growth
Total NSTAR Electric
PSNH:
Basic Business
Aging Infrastructure
Load Growth
Total PSNH
WMECO:
Basic Business
Aging Infrastructure
Load Growth
Total WMECO
Total - Electric Distribution (excluding Generation)
Other Distribution
PSNH Generation
WMECO Generation
Natural Gas
Total Electric and Natural Gas Distribution Segment
For the Years Ended December 31,
2015
2014
2013
$
$
141.1
151.0
42.2
334.3
108.7
103.1
51.9
263.7
59.2
57.3
25.5
142.0
18.2
18.5
6.6
43.3
783.3
-
33.3
-
212.6
1,029.2
$
$
120.2
118.0
66.3
304.5
99.0
104.2
43.1
246.3
62.1
45.3
27.1
134.5
19.0
16.1
6.1
41.2
726.5
-
13.1
7.6
193.7
940.9
$
$
60.9
160.7
76.9
298.5
98.5
110.6
53.6
262.7
22.7
50.5
29.3
102.5
7.9
24.6
9.2
41.7
705.4
0.7
9.7
4.5
175.2
895.5
For the electric distribution business, basic business includes the purchase of meters, tools, vehicles, information technology, transformer
replacements, equipment facilities, and the relocation of plant. Aging infrastructure relates to reliability and the replacement of overhead lines, plant
substations, underground cable replacement, and equipment failures. Load growth includes requests for new business and capacity additions on
distribution lines and substation additions and expansions.
Natural Gas Distribution Business Expansion and Enhancement: In 2013, in accordance with Connecticut law and regulations, PURA approved a
comprehensive joint natural gas infrastructure expansion plan (expansion plan) filed by Yankee Gas and other Connecticut natural gas distribution
companies. The expansion plan described how Yankee Gas expects to add approximately 82,000 new natural gas heating customers over a 10-year
period. Yankee Gas estimated that its portion of the plan would cost approximately $700 million over 10 years. In January 2015, the PURA
approved a joint settlement agreement proposed by Yankee Gas and other Connecticut natural gas distribution companies and regulatory agencies
that clarified the procedures and oversight criteria applicable to the expansion plan. On March 20, 2015, Yankee Gas filed its initial System
Expansion (SE) Rate reconciliation for 2014. The proposed SE rate was approved by the PURA for implementation as of April 1, 2015, pending
final PURA approval following a contested hearing.
In October 2014, pursuant to new legislation, NSTAR Gas filed the Gas System Enhancement Program (GSEP) with the DPU. NSTAR Gas’
program accelerates the replacement of certain natural gas distribution facilities in the system to within 25 years. The GSEP includes a new tariff
effective January 1, 2016 that provides NSTAR Gas an opportunity to collect the costs for the program on an annual basis through a newly designed
reconciling factor. On April 30, 2015, the DPU approved the GSEP. We expect capital expenditures of approximately $255 million for the period
2016 through 2019 for the GSEP.
35
Projected Capital Expenditures: A summary of the projected capital expenditures for the Regulated companies’ electric transmission and for the total
electric distribution, generation, and natural gas distribution businesses for 2016 through 2019, including information technology and facilities
upgrades and enhancements on behalf of the Regulated companies, is as follows:
(Millions of Dollars)
CL&P Transmission
NSTAR Electric Transmission
PSNH Transmission
WMECO Transmission
NPT
Total Electric Transmission
Electric Distribution
Generation
Natural Gas
Total Distribution
Information Technology and All Other
Total
$
$
$
$
$
$
2016
2017
351
302
112
115
31
911
892
20
284
1,196
105
2,212
$
$
$
$
$
$
250
216
65
78
684
1,293
963
-
318
1,281
88
2,662
$
$
$
$
$
$
Years
2018
2019
2016-2019
Total
215
238
38
22
636
1,149
888
-
339
1,227
82
2,458
$
$
$
$
$
$
157
149
56
40
149
551
840
-
357
1,197
87
1,835
$
$
$
$
$
$
973
905
271
255
1,500
3,904
3,583
20
1,298
4,901
362
9,167
The projections do not include capital investments related to Access Northeast or Clean Energy Connect. Actual capital expenditures could vary
from the projected amounts for the companies and years above.
FERC Regulatory Issues
FERC ROE Complaints: Three separate complaints have been filed at FERC by combinations of New England state attorneys general, state
regulatory commissions, consumer advocates, consumer groups, municipal parties and other parties (the “Complainants”). In these three separate
complaints, the Complainants challenged the NETOs’ base ROE of 11.14 percent that had been utilized since 2006 and sought an order to reduce it
prospectively from the date of the final FERC order and for the 15-month complaint refund periods stipulated in the separate complaints. In 2014,
the FERC ordered a 10.57 percent base ROE for the first complaint refund period and prospectively from October 16, 2014, and that a utility’s total
or maximum ROE shall not exceed the top of the new zone of reasonableness, which was set at 11.74 percent. The NETOs and the Complainants
sought rehearing from FERC. In late 2014, the NETOs made a compliance filing and the Company began issuing refunds to customers from the first
complaint period.
As a result of the actions taken by the FERC and other developments in the first complaint matter, the Company recorded reserves at its electric
subsidiaries in 2015, 2014 and 2013. In 2015, Eversource recognized an after-tax charge to earnings (excluding interest) of $12.4 million, of which
$7.9 million was recorded at CL&P, $1.4 million at NSTAR Electric, $0.6 million at PSNH, and $2.5 million at WMECO. The net aggregate after-
tax charge to earnings (excluding interest) in 2014 totaled $22.4 million, of which $12.4 million was recorded at CL&P, $4.9 million at NSTAR
Electric, $1.7 million at PSNH and $3.4 million at WMECO. The aggregate after-tax charge to earnings (excluding interest) in 2013 totaled $14.3
million, of which $7.7 million was recorded at CL&P, $3.4 million at NSTAR Electric, $1.4 million at PSNH and $1.8 million at WMECO. The
NETOs and Complainants have filed appeals to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. A court decision is expected in late 2016.
For the second and third complaints, the state parties, municipal utilities and FERC trial staff each believe that the base ROE should be reduced to an
amount lower than 10.57 percent. The NETOs believe that the Complainants’ positions are without merit, and the existing base ROE of 10.57
percent is just and reasonable and should be maintained. The FERC ALJ’s initial recommendation is expected by March 31, 2016. A final FERC
order is expected in late 2016 or early 2017.
As of December 31, 2015, CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH, and WMECO had approximately $2.7 billion of aggregate shareholder equity invested in
their transmission facilities. As a result, each 10 basis point change in the authorized base ROE would change annual consolidated earnings by an
approximate $2.7 million. Although we are uncertain on the final outcome of the second and third complaints regarding the ROE, we believe the
current reserves established are appropriate to reflect probable and reasonably estimable refunds.
FERC Order No. 1000: On August 15, 2014, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the FERC’s authority to order major changes to transmission
planning and cost allocation in FERC Order No. 1000 and Order No. 1000-A, including transmission planning for public policy needs, and the
requirement that utilities remove from their transmission tariffs their rights of first refusal to build transmission. On March 19, 2015, the FERC acted
on all rehearing requests filed by the NETOs, including CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO, and other parties and accepted the November
2013 compliance filing made by ISO-NE and the NETOs, subject to further compliance. The FERC accepted our proposal that the new competitive
transmission planning process will not apply to certain projects, which have been declared as the preferred solution by ISO-NE, unless ISO-NE later
decides a solution must be re-evaluated. The FERC determined on rehearing that we can restore provisions that recognize the NETOs’ rights to
retain use and control of their existing rights of ways. Final compliance was filed by the NETOs in November 2015 and was accepted by the FERC
on December 14, 2015.
Additionally, the FERC affirmed that it can eliminate our right of first refusal to build transmission in New England even though the FERC
previously approved and granted special protections to these rights. The NETOs filed an appeal to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, challenging
this FERC ruling. State regulators also filed an appeal, challenging FERC’s determination that ISO-NE should select public policy transmission
projects after a competitive process. The Court is expected to resolve the appeals in 2016.
36
Regulatory Developments and Rate Matters
General:
Clean Energy RFP: In February 2015, pursuant to clean energy goals established in three New England states (Connecticut, Massachusetts and
Rhode Island), CL&P, NSTAR Electric, WMECO, other EDCs, and state agencies in the three states jointly developed and issued a draft request for
proposal (RFP) for clean energy resources (including Class I renewable generation and large hydroelectric generation). The draft RFP solicits offers
for clean energy and the transmission to deliver that energy to the three states. The procurement will allow the states to identify large-scale projects
that may offer the potential to meet their clean energy goals in a cost-effective manner when entered into jointly, while complying with the clean
energy statutes within the three states.
The DPU and the Rhode Island Public Utilities Commission (PUC) approved the draft RFP that was jointly submitted by certain EDCs. The draft
RFP encompassed the timetable and method for the solicitation and execution of any associated long-term contracts. On August 31, 2015, the DEEP
issued a notice of proceeding on the Connecticut portion of the draft RFP and accepted public comment through September 30, 2015. On
November 12, 2015, the DEEP and the Massachusetts and Rhode Island EDCs issued the RFP to a wide range of potentially interested bidders. In
late January 2016, bidders submitted project proposals, among which were the Northern Pass and Clean Energy Connect projects, selection of which
will take place between April and July 2016. The expected timeframe within which EDCs will execute contracts and submit them for regulatory
commission approval from the respective state regulators is from June through October 2016 with approval expected in late 2016.
New England Natural Gas Pipeline Capacity: In 2014, the six New England states began to explore ways to address and mitigate winter natural gas
price volatility and the associated impact on electric power supply costs attributable to winter pipeline capacity constraints. Five states are currently
pursuing natural gas capacity expansion efforts. In 2014, Rhode Island approved legislation authorizing the Rhode Island Division of Public Utilities
and Carriers and the Office of Energy Resources to participate in the RFP process and file proposals with the PUC. In late 2015, Access Northeast
bid on the natural gas pipeline and storage RFP issued by the Rhode Island EDC. We expect the EDC will file their selected contracts with the PUC
in the first half of 2016. The Massachusetts DPU determined that it has the authority to allow EDCs to contract for natural gas pipeline capacity and
in late 2015, certain Massachusetts EDCs, including NSTAR Electric and WMECO, issued a natural gas pipeline capacity RFP. In December 2015
and January 2016, those Massachusetts EDCs filed with the DPU seeking approval of the contracts for pipeline and storage capacity, including
Access Northeast. On January 19, 2016, the NHPUC issued an order accepting a staff report that concluded that the NHPUC could approve contracts
between pipelines and EDCs if they were shown to reduce electricity costs and be in the public interest. In February 2016, PSNH filed for approval
with the NHPUC, its proposed contract for natural gas pipeline capacity and storage with Access Northeast. The Connecticut DEEP expects to
provide an opportunity for public comment on a natural gas pipeline capacity RFP in the first quarter of 2016.
Electric and Natural Gas Base Distribution Rates:
Each Eversource utility subsidiary is subject to the regulatory jurisdiction of the state in which it operates: CL&P and Yankee Gas operate in
Connecticut and are subject to PURA regulation; NSTAR Electric, WMECO and NSTAR Gas operate in Massachusetts and are subject to DPU
regulation; and PSNH operates in New Hampshire and is subject to NHPUC regulation. The Regulated companies’ distribution rates are set by their
respective state regulatory commissions, and their tariffs include mechanisms for periodically adjusting their rates for the recovery of specific
incurred costs.
In Connecticut, CL&P distribution rates were established in a 2014 PURA approved rate case. Yankee Gas distribution rates were established in a
2011 PURA approved rate case. In Massachusetts, electric utility companies are required to file at least one distribution rate case every five years,
and natural gas companies to file at least one distribution rate case every 10 years, and those companies are limited to one settlement agreement in
any 10-year period. NSTAR Electric and WMECO were subject to a base distribution rate freeze through December 31, 2015. NSTAR Gas
distribution rates effective January 1, 2016 were established in an October 30, 2015 DPU distribution rate order. See Massachusetts – NSTAR Gas
Distribution Rates in this Regulatory Developments and Rate Matters section for further information. In New Hampshire, PSNH distribution rates
were established in a settlement approved by the NHPUC in 2010. Prior to the expiration of that settlement, the NHPUC approved the continuation,
and increased funding via rates, of PSNH’s reliability enhancement program. See New Hampshire - Distribution Rates in this Regulatory
Developments and Rate Matters section for further information.
Electric and Natural Gas Retail Rates:
The Eversource EDCs obtain and resell power to retail customers who choose not to buy energy from a competitive energy supplier. The natural gas
distribution companies procure natural gas for firm and seasonal customers. These energy supply procurement costs are recovered from customers in
energy supply rates that are approved by the respective state regulatory commission. The rates are reset periodically and are fully reconciled to their
costs. Each electric and natural gas distribution company fully recovers its energy supply costs through approved regulatory rate mechanisms and,
therefore, such costs have no impact on earnings.
The electric and natural gas distribution companies also recover certain costs on a fully reconciling basis through regulatory commission-approved
cost tracking mechanisms and, therefore, such costs have no impact on earnings. Costs recovered through costs tracking mechanisms include energy
efficiency program costs, electric transmission charges, electric federally mandated congestion charges, system resiliency costs, certain uncollectible
hardship bad debt expenses, and restructuring and stranded costs resulting from deregulation. The reconciliation filings compare the total actual costs
allowed to revenue requirements related to these services and the difference between the costs incurred (or the rate recovery allowed) and the actual
costs allowed is deferred and included, to be either recovered or refunded, in future customer rates.
37
Connecticut:
CL&P Distribution Rates: In December 2014, the PURA granted a re-opener request to CL&P’s base distribution rate application for further review
of the appropriate balance of ADIT utilized in the calculation of rate base. On July 2, 2015, the PURA issued a final order that approved a settlement
agreement filed on May 19, 2015 between CL&P and the PURA Prosecutorial Staff. The order allows for an increase to rate base of approximately
$163 million associated with ADIT, including a regulatory asset to recover the incremental revenue requirement for the period December 1, 2014
through November 30, 2015 over a subsequent 24-month period. The rate base increase provided an increase to total allowed annual revenue
requirements of $18.4 million beginning December 1, 2014. As part of the settlement agreement, the $18.4 million for the period December 1, 2014
through November 30, 2015 was recorded as a regulatory asset with a corresponding increase in Operating Revenues, and is being collected from
customers in rates over a 24-month period beginning December 1, 2015.
CL&P and Yankee Gas Conservation and Load Management Plan: On December 31, 2015, DEEP approved the three-year electric and natural gas
C&LM plan filed by CL&P and Yankee Gas, which was jointly developed with the Connecticut EDCs and natural gas distribution companies. The
C&LM plan, which covers the years 2016 through 2018, was built upon the continued success and momentum of the previous C&LM plans and
includes performance incentives totaling $24 million over the three-year period related to proposed savings goals for CL&P and Yankee Gas.
Yankee Gas Settlement Agreement: On April 29, 2015, the PURA approved a settlement agreement entered into among Yankee Gas, the
Connecticut Office of Consumer Counsel, and the PURA Staff, which eliminated the requirement to file a base distribution rate case in 2015. Under
the terms of the settlement agreement, Yankee Gas provided a $1.5 million rate credit to firm customers beginning in December 2015 and continued
through February 2016, and established an earnings sharing mechanism whereby Yankee Gas and its customers will share equally in any earnings
exceeding a 9.5 percent ROE in a twelve month period commencing with the period from April 1, 2015 through March 31, 2016. Additionally,
Yankee Gas shall forgo its right to file a rate case for an increase in its base distribution rates prior to January 1, 2017. This does not impact the rates
charged under the Connecticut comprehensive energy strategy (CES) program. The settlement agreement also resolved two pending regulatory
proceedings before the PURA pertaining to a review of Yankee Gas’ overearnings. In 2015, Yankee Gas recorded the $1.5 million expected refund
to customers as a reduction to operating revenues.
Massachusetts:
NSTAR Electric and NSTAR Gas Comprehensive Settlement Agreement: On March 2, 2015, the DPU approved the comprehensive settlement
agreement between NSTAR Electric, NSTAR Gas and the Massachusetts Attorney General (the “Settlement”) as filed with the DPU on
December 31, 2014. The Settlement resolved the outstanding NSTAR Electric CPSL program filings for 2006 through 2011, the NSTAR Electric
and NSTAR Gas PAM and energy efficiency-related customer billing adjustments reported in 2012, and the recovery of LBR related to NSTAR
Electric’s energy efficiency programs for 2009 through 2011 (11 dockets in total). In the first quarter of 2015, as a result of the DPU order, NSTAR
Electric and NSTAR Gas commenced refunding a combined $44.7 million to customers, which was recorded as a regulatory liability. Refunds to
customers will continue through December 2016. As a result of the Settlement, NSTAR Electric increased its operating revenues and decreased its
amortization expense in 2015, resulting in the recognition of a $13 million after-tax benefit.
NSTAR Electric Basic Service Bad Debt Adder: On January 7, 2015, the DPU issued an order concluding that NSTAR Electric had removed
energy-related bad debt costs from base distribution rates effective January 1, 2006. As a result of the DPU order, in the first quarter of 2015,
NSTAR Electric increased its regulatory assets and reduced its operations and maintenance expense by an under recovered amount of $24.2 million
for energy-related bad debt costs through 2014, resulting in after-tax earnings of $14.5 million. NSTAR Electric filed for recovery of the energy-
related bad debt costs regulatory asset from customers and on November 20, 2015, the DPU approved NSTAR Electric’s proposed rate increase to
recover these costs over a 12-month period, beginning January 1, 2016.
NSTAR Electric and WMECO Grid Modernization Plan: As part of the DPU’s investigation into the modernization of the electric grid, in August
2015, NSTAR Electric and WMECO filed a comprehensive ten-year plan with the DPU. The plan focuses on technologies and investments that
modernize the grid with proposed investments in equipment that reduces the frequency and duration of power outages, optimizes and manages
electrical demand, integrates distributed energy resources, and improves workforce and asset management. The plan includes incremental spending
of approximately $430 million over the first five years, which would be recovered from customers in rates, and is pending DPU review and approval.
There is currently no timeline for the DPU to take any action on this plan.
NSTAR Electric, WMECO and NSTAR Gas Energy Efficiency Plan: The Massachusetts EDCs and natural gas distribution companies have
increased their energy efficiency savings achievements significantly since the enactment of the Green Communities Act in 2008, with electric savings
almost tripling between 2008 and 2014. On January 28, 2016, the DPU issued an order approving NSTAR Electric’s, WMECO’s, and NSTAR Gas’
three-year electric and natural gas energy efficiency plan, which was jointly developed with other Massachusetts EDCs and natural gas distribution
companies. As part of this plan, which covers the years 2016 through 2018, NSTAR Electric, WMECO, and NSTAR Gas will maintain aggressive
savings goals. The plan includes the ability to earn performance incentives related to these aggressive savings goals totaling $58 million over the
three-year period for NSTAR Electric, WMECO and NSTAR Gas, as well as recovery of LBR of approximately $50 million on an annual basis for
NSTAR Electric until it is operating under a decoupled rate structure.
NSTAR Electric DPU Safety and Reliability Programs: The safety and reliability programs allowed NSTAR Electric to recover $15 million per year,
through December 31, 2015, related to DPU approved safety and reliability programs, which are designed to mitigate stray voltage and repair and
replace portions of the system to increase and enhance customer safety.
NSTAR Gas Distribution Rates: On October 30, 2015, the DPU issued its order in the NSTAR Gas distribution rate case, which approved an
annualized base rate increase of $15.8 million, plus other increases of approximately $11.5 million, mostly relating to recovery of pension and PBOP
expenses and the Hopkinton Gas Service Agreement (GSA), effective January 1, 2016. In the order, the DPU also approved an authorized regulatory
38
ROE of 9.8 percent, the establishment of a revenue decoupling mechanism, the recovery of certain bad debt expenses, and a 52.1 percent equity
component of its capital structure. On November 19, 2015, NSTAR Gas filed a motion for reconsideration of the order with the DPU seeking the
correction of mathematical errors and other plant and cost of service items.
As a result of this order, Eversource recorded regulatory deferrals for costs that have been approved for recovery or are expected to be approved for
recovery in future rate proceedings, which resulted in the recognition of a $10.3 million after-tax benefit in 2015. Included in this amount is a $6.3
million after-tax benefit recorded at NSTAR Electric for certain uncollectible hardship accounts receivable that are expected to be recovered in future
rates given the allowed recoveries of uncollectible hardship accounts receivable by WMECO and NSTAR Gas.
NSTAR Gas - Gas Service Agreement: On April 29, 2015, the DPU approved the GSA, subject to DPU modifications, between NSTAR Gas and
Hopkinton LNG Corp. (HOPCO), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Eversource. On October 30, 2015, the DPU issued its order in the
NSTAR Gas distribution rate case that required minor changes to the GSA. On May 22, 2015 and November 17, 2015, we filed revised GSAs with
the DPU reflecting these modifications. The GSA effectively replaces the former gas services agreement in place between NSTAR Gas and
HOPCO, maintains NSTAR Gas Company’s entitlement to 100 percent of the current capacity of the HOPCO facilities, and provides for the
recovery of costs associated with planned capital expenditures at the HOPCO facilities. We currently estimate the HOPCO facilities’ capital
expenditures to be approximately $200 million, most of which will be invested and placed into service in the first five years of the GSA. The GSA
has a 30-year term commencing on January 1, 2016.
New Hampshire:
Distribution Rates: PSNH distribution rates were established in a settlement approved by the NHPUC in 2010. Rates established therein will
continue until changed by the NHPUC in a subsequent distribution rate proceeding. In June 2015, PSNH sought and obtained approval for a
distribution rate increase to fund continuation of the reliability enhancement program beyond the end of the PSNH’s 2010 distribution rate
settlement.
Generation Divestiture:
On June 10, 2015, Eversource and PSNH entered into the 2015 Public Service Company of New Hampshire Restructuring and Rate Stabilization
Agreement (the Agreement) with the New Hampshire Office of Energy and Planning, certain members of the NHPUC staff, the Office of Consumer
Advocate, two State Senators, and several other parties. The Agreement was filed with the NHPUC on the same day. Under the terms of the
Agreement, PSNH has agreed to divest its generation assets upon NHPUC approval. The Agreement is designed to provide a resolution of issues
pertaining to PSNH’s generation assets in pending regulatory proceedings before the NHPUC. The Agreement provided for the Clean Air Project
prudence proceeding to be resolved and all remaining Clean Air Project costs to be included in rates effective January 1, 2016. As part of the
Agreement, PSNH has agreed to forego recovery of $25 million of the deferred equity return related to the Clean Air Project. In addition, PSNH will
not seek a general distribution rate increase effective before July 1, 2017 and will contribute $5 million to create a clean energy fund, which will not
be recoverable from its customers. In 2015, PSNH recorded the $5 million contribution as a long-term liability and an increase to Operations and
Maintenance expense on the statements of income.
Upon completion of the divestiture process, all remaining stranded costs will be recovered via bonds that will be secured by a non-bypassable charge
or through other recoveries in rates billed to PSNH’s customers. For further information on the securitization legislation that was signed into law on
July 9, 2015, see “Legislative and Policy Matters – New Hampshire” in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and
Results of Operations.
On January 26, 2016, Advisory Staff of the NHPUC and the parties to the Agreement filed a stipulation with the NHPUC agreeing that near-term
divestiture of PSNH’s generation was in the public interest and that the Agreement should be approved. Implementation of the Agreement is subject
to NHPUC approval, which is expected in early 2016.
We believe that full recovery of PSNH’s generation assets is probable through a combination of cash flows during the remaining operating period,
sales proceeds upon divestiture, and recovery of stranded costs in future rates.
Clean Air Project Prudence Proceeding: The Clean Air Project, which involved the installation of wet scrubber technology at PSNH’s Merrimack
coal-fired generation station in Bow, New Hampshire, pursuant to state law, was placed in service in September 2011. In April 2012, the NHPUC
issued an order authorizing temporary rates to recover a significant portion of the Clean Air Project costs.
Pursuant to the Agreement, on December 22, 2015, the NHPUC approved PSNH’s request to increase its default energy service rate for full recovery
of costs (including a return) related to the Clean Air Project, as well as a deferred equity return, effective January 1, 2016. The approved energy
supply portion of the 2016 rate is 9.99 cents per kWh (including all Clean Energy Project-related costs), and the SCRC rate for 2016 is a credit to
customers of 0.017 cents per kWh.
Legislative and Policy Matters
Federal: On December 18, 2015, the “Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes” Act became law, which extended the accelerated deduction of
depreciation to businesses from 2015 through 2019. This extended stimulus provides us with cash flow benefits of approximately $275 million
(including approximately $105 million for CL&P) due to a refund of taxes paid in 2015 and lower expected tax payments in 2016 of approximately
$300 million.
39
New Hampshire: On July 9, 2015, the Governor of New Hampshire signed “An Act Relative to Electric Rate Reduction Financing” (the Act)
permitting the NHPUC to issue finance orders that authorize the issuance of rate reduction bonds in accordance with the PSNH divestiture agreement
and the expected NHPUC divestiture order, regarding cost recovery of the Clean Air project and divestiture of PSNH’s remaining generation plants.
Connecticut: In 2015, the state of Connecticut enacted several changes to its corporate tax laws. Among the changes, commencing as of January 1,
2015, is the reduction in the amount of tax credits that corporations can utilize against its tax liability in a year and a continuation of the corporate
income tax surcharge through 2018, which effectively increases the state corporate tax rate to 9 percent for the years 2016 and 2017 and 8.25 percent
for 2018. Also, effective January 1, 2016, all Connecticut companies have a mandatory unitary tax filing requirement. We continue to review the tax
law changes and their impact on the effective tax rates of Eversource and CL&P.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates, assumptions and, at times, difficult,
subjective or complex judgments. Changes in these estimates, assumptions and judgments, in and of themselves, could materially impact our
financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Our management discusses with the Audit Committee of our Board of Trustees significant
matters relating to critical accounting policies. Our critical accounting policies are discussed below. See the combined notes to our financial
statements for further information concerning the accounting policies, estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of our financial statements.
Regulatory Accounting: Our Regulated companies are subject to rate-regulation that is based on cost recovery and meets the criteria for application
of accounting guidance for rate-regulated operations, which considers the effect of regulation on the timing of the recognition of certain revenues and
expenses. The Regulated companies’ financial statements reflect the effects of the rate-making process.
The application of accounting guidance for rate-regulated enterprises results in recording regulatory assets and liabilities. Regulatory assets represent
the deferral of incurred costs that are probable of future recovery in customer rates. Regulatory assets are amortized as the incurred costs are
recovered through customer rates. In some cases, we record regulatory assets before approval for recovery has been received from the applicable
regulatory commission. We must use judgment to conclude that costs deferred as regulatory assets are probable of future recovery. We base our
conclusion on certain factors, including, but not limited to, regulatory precedent. Regulatory liabilities represent revenues received from customers
to fund expected costs that have not yet been incurred or probable future refunds to customers.
We use our best judgment when recording regulatory assets and liabilities; however, regulatory commissions can reach different conclusions about
the recovery of costs, and those conclusions could have a material impact on our financial statements. We believe it is probable that each of the
Regulated companies will recover the regulatory assets that have been recorded. If we determine that we can no longer apply the accounting
guidance applicable to rate-regulated enterprises to our operations, or that we cannot conclude it is probable that costs will be recovered from
customers in future rates, the costs would be charged to earnings in the period in which the determination is made.
Unbilled Revenues: The determination of retail energy sales to residential, commercial and industrial customers is based on the reading of meters,
which occurs regularly throughout the month. Billed revenues are based on these meter readings, and the majority of our recorded annual revenues is
based on actual billings. Because customers are billed throughout the month based on pre-determined cycles rather than on a calendar month basis,
an estimate of electricity or natural gas delivered to customers for which the customers have not yet been billed is calculated as of the balance sheet
date.
Unbilled revenues represent an estimate of electricity or natural gas delivered to customers but not yet billed. Unbilled revenues are included in
Operating Revenues on the statement of income and are assets on the balance sheet that are reclassified to Accounts Receivable in the following
month as customers are billed. Such estimates are subject to adjustment when actual meter readings become available or when there is a change in
our estimates.
The Regulated companies estimate unbilled sales monthly using the daily load cycle method. The daily load cycle method allocates billed sales to
the current calendar month based on the daily load for each billing cycle. The billed sales are subtracted from total month load, net of delivery
losses, to estimate unbilled sales. Unbilled revenues are estimated by first allocating unbilled sales to the respective customer classes, then applying
an estimated rate by customer class to those sales. The estimate of unbilled revenues is sensitive to factors such as energy demand, weather and
changes in the composition of customer classes that can significantly impact the amount of revenues recorded at NSTAR Electric and PSNH because
they do not have a revenue decoupling mechanism. CL&P and WMECO record a regulatory deferral to reflect the actual allowed amount of revenue
for decoupling, and unbilled revenues estimation is not critical to CL&P and WMECO.
Pension and PBOP: We sponsor Pension and PBOP Plans to provide retirement benefits to our employees. Effective January 1, 2015, the two
Pension Plans were merged into one Pension Plan, sponsored by Eversource Service, and our PBOP Plans were merged into one PBOP Plan,
sponsored by Eversource Service. For each of these plans, several significant assumptions are used to determine the projected benefit obligation,
funded status and net periodic benefit cost. These assumptions include the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, discount rate,
compensation/progression rate, mortality assumptions, and health care cost trend rates. We evaluate these assumptions at least annually and adjust
them as necessary. Changes in these assumptions could have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Pre-tax net periodic benefit expense for the Pension Plan (excluding the SERP Plans) was $124.2 million, $118.4 million and $236.3 million for the
years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The pre-tax net periodic benefit expense for the PBOP Plan was $2.4 million, $8.1
million and $32.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
40
Expected Long-Term Rate of Return on Plan Assets: In developing this assumption, we consider historical and expected returns as well as input
from our consultants. Our expected long-term rate of return on assets is based on assumptions regarding target asset allocations and corresponding
expected rates of return for each asset class. We routinely review the actual asset allocations and periodically rebalance the investments to the
targeted asset allocations when appropriate. For the year ended December 31, 2015, our aggregate expected long-term rate of return assumption of
8.25 percent was used to determine our pension and PBOP expense. For the forecasted 2016 pension and PBOP expense, our expected long-term
rate of return of 8.25 percent for all plans was used reflecting our target asset allocations.
Discount Rate: Payment obligations related to the Pension and PBOP Plans are discounted at interest rates applicable to the expected timing of each
plan’s cash flows. The discount rate that was utilized in determining the 2015 pension and PBOP obligations was based on a yield-curve approach.
This approach utilizes a population of bonds with an average rating of AA based on bond ratings by Moody’s, S&P and Fitch, and uses bonds with
above median yields within that population. As of December 31, 2015, the discount rates used to determine the funded status were 4.6 percent for
the Pension Plan and 4.62 percent for the PBOP Plan. As of December 31, 2014, the discount rates used were 4.2 percent for the Pension Plans and
4.22 percent for the PBOP Plans. The increase in the discount rate used to calculate the funded status resulted in a decrease on the Pension and
PBOP Plan’s liability of approximately $267 million and $60 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2015.
Compensation/Progression Rate: This assumption reflects the expected long-term salary growth rate, including consideration of the levels of
increases built into collective bargaining agreements, and impacts the estimated benefits that Pension Plan participants receive in the future. As of
both December 31, 2015 and 2014, the compensation/progression rate used to determine the funded status was 3.5 percent.
Mortality Assumptions: Assumptions as to mortality of the participants in our Pension and PBOP Plans are a key estimate in measuring the expected
payments a participant may receive over their lifetime and the corresponding plan liability we need to record. During 2014, the Society of Actuaries
released a series of updated mortality tables resulting from studies that measured mortality rates for various groups of individuals. The updated
mortality tables released in 2014 increased the life expectancy of plan participants by three to five years and had the effect of increasing the estimated
benefits to be provided to plan participants. The impact of adopting the updated mortality tables on Eversource’s liability as of December 31, 2014
was an increase of approximately $340 million and $82 million for the Pension and PBOP Plans, respectively. In 2015, a revised scale for the
mortality table was released having the effect of decreasing the estimate of benefits to be provided to plan participants. The impact of the adoption of
the new mortality scale resulted in a decrease of $48 million and $23 million for the Pension and PBOP Plans’ liability, respectively, as of
December 31, 2015.
Actuarial Determination of Expense: Pension and PBOP expense is determined by our actuaries and consists of service cost and prior service cost,
interest cost based on the discounting of the obligations, and amortization of actuarial gains and losses, offset by the expected return on plan assets.
Actuarial gains and losses represent differences between assumptions and actual information or updated assumptions.
The expected return on plan assets is determined by applying the assumed long-term rate of return to the Pension and PBOP Plan asset balances.
This calculated expected return is compared to the actual return or loss on plan assets at the end of each year to determine the investment gains or
losses to be immediately reflected in unrecognized actuarial gains and losses.
Forecasted Expenses and Expected Contributions: We estimate that the expense for the Pension Plan (excluding the SERP Plans) will be
approximately $65 million and income for the PBOP Plan will be approximately $7.7 million, respectively, in 2016. Effective January 1, 2016, we
elected to transition the discount rate to the spot rate methodology from the yield-curve approach for the service and interest cost components of
Pension and PBOP expense because it provides a more precise measurement by matching projected cash flows to the corresponding spot rates on the
yield curve. Historically, these components were estimated using the same weighted-average discount rate as for the funded status. The discount
rates used to estimate the 2016 service costs are 4.91 percent and 5.14 percent for the Pension and PBOP Plans, respectively. The discount rates used
to estimate the 2016 interest costs are 3.80 percent and 3.72 percent for the Pension and PBOP Plans, respectively. Pension and PBOP expense for
subsequent years will depend on future investment performance, changes in future discount rates and other assumptions, and various other factors
related to the populations participating in the plans. Pension and PBOP expense charged to earnings is net of the amounts capitalized.
Our policy is to annually fund the Pension Plan in an amount at least equal to the amount that will satisfy all federal funding requirements. We
contributed $154.6 million to the Pension Plan in 2015. We currently estimate approximately $146 million of contributions to the Pension Plan in
2016.
For the PBOP Plan, it is our policy to annually fund the PBOP Plan though tax deductible contributions to external trusts. We contributed $7.9
million to the PBOP Plan in 2015. We currently estimate approximately $9.5 million in contributions to the PBOP Plan in 2016.
Sensitivity Analysis: The following represents the hypothetical increase to the Pension Plan’s (excluding the SERP Plans) and PBOP Plan’s reported
annual cost as a result of a change in the following assumptions by 50 basis points:
(Millions of Dollars)
Assumption Change
Eversource
Lower expected long-term rate of return
Lower discount rate
Higher compensation rate
Increase in Pension Plan Cost
Increase in PBOP Plan Cost
$
$
$
2015
20.6
26.3
12.4
$
$
$
As of December 31,
2014
2015
2014
$
$
19.3
19.1
10.2
4.2 $
6.2 $
N/A
4.0
2.2
N/A
41
Health Care Cost: As of December 31, 2015, the health care cost trend rate assumption used to determine the PBOP Plan’s year end funded status
was 6.25 percent, subsequently decreasing to an ultimate rate of 4.5 percent in 2023. The effect of a hypothetical increase in the health care cost trend
rate by one percentage point would be an increase to the service and interest cost components of PBOP Plan expense by $8.5 million in 2015, and a
$115.3 million increase to the PBOP obligation.
Goodwill: We have recorded approximately $3.5 billion of goodwill associated with previous mergers and acquisitions. We have identified our
reporting units for purposes of allocating and testing goodwill as Electric Distribution, Electric Transmission and Natural Gas Distribution. These
reporting units are consistent with our operating segments underlying our reportable segments. Electric Distribution and Electric Transmission
reporting units include carrying values for the respective components of CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO. The Natural Gas
Distribution reporting unit includes the carrying values of NSTAR Gas and Yankee Gas. As of December 31, 2015, goodwill was allocated to the
reporting units as follows: $2.5 billion to Electric Distribution, $0.6 billion to Electric Transmission, and $0.4 billion to Natural Gas Distribution.
We are required to test goodwill balances for impairment at least annually by considering the fair values of the reporting units, which requires us to
use estimates and judgments. We have selected October 1st of each year as the annual goodwill impairment testing date. Goodwill impairment is
deemed to exist if the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value and if the implied fair value of goodwill based on the
estimated fair values of the reporting units’ assets and liabilities is less than the carrying amount of the goodwill. If goodwill were deemed to be
impaired, it would be written down in the current period to the extent of the impairment.
We performed an impairment test of goodwill as of October 1, 2015 for the Electric Distribution, Electric Transmission and Natural Gas Distribution
reporting units. This evaluation required the consideration of several factors that impact the fair value of the reporting units, including conditions and
assumptions that affect the future cash flows of the reporting units. Key considerations include discount rates, utility sector market performance and
merger transaction multiples, and internal estimates of future cash flows and net income.
The 2015 goodwill impairment test resulted in a conclusion that goodwill is not impaired and no reporting unit is at risk of a goodwill impairment.
Income Taxes: Income tax expense is estimated for each of the jurisdictions in which we operate and is recorded each quarter using an estimated
annualized effective tax rate. This process to record income tax expense involves estimating current and deferred income tax expense or benefit and
the impact of temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for financial reporting and income tax return reporting purposes.
Such differences are the result of timing of the deduction for expenses, as well as any impact of permanent differences, non-tax deductible expenses,
or other items that directly impact income tax expense as a result of regulatory activity (flow-through items). The temporary differences and flow-
through items result in deferred tax assets and liabilities that are included in the balance sheets.
We also account for uncertainty in income taxes, which applies to all income tax positions previously filed in a tax return and income tax positions
expected to be taken in a future tax return that have been reflected on our balance sheets. The determination of whether a tax position meets the
recognition threshold under applicable accounting guidance is based on facts and circumstances available to us. Once a tax position meets the
recognition threshold, the tax benefit is measured using a cumulative probability assessment. Assigning probabilities in measuring a recognized tax
position and evaluating new information or events in subsequent periods requires significant judgment and could change previous conclusions used
to measure the tax position estimate. New information or events may include tax examinations or appeals (including information gained from those
examinations), developments in case law, settlements of tax positions, changes in tax law and regulations, rulings by taxing authorities and statute of
limitation expirations. Such information or events may have a significant impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Accounting for Environmental Reserves: Environmental reserves are accrued when assessments indicate it is probable that a liability has been
incurred and an amount can be reasonably estimated. Adjustments made to estimates of environmental liabilities could have an adverse impact on
earnings. We estimate these liabilities based on findings through various phases of the assessment, considering the most likely action plan from a
variety of available remediation options (ranging from no action required to full site remediation and long-term monitoring), current site information
from our site assessments, remediation estimates from third party engineering and remediation contractors, and our prior experience in remediating
contaminated sites. If a most likely action plan cannot yet be determined, we estimate the liability based on the low end of a range of possible action
plans. A significant portion of our environmental sites and reserve amounts relate to former MGP sites that were operated several decades ago and
manufactured gas from coal and other processes, which resulted in certain by-products remaining in the environment that may pose a potential risk to
human health and the environment. As assessments on these sites are performed, we may receive new information to be considered in our estimates
related to the extent and nature of the contamination and the costs of required remediation.
Our estimates also incorporate currently enacted state and federal environmental laws and regulations and data released by the EPA and other
organizations. The estimates associated with each possible action plan are judgmental in nature partly because there are usually several different
remediation options from which to choose. Our estimates are subject to revision in future periods based on actual costs or new information from
other sources, including the level of contamination at the site, the extent of our responsibility or the extent of remediation required, recently enacted
laws and regulations or a change in cost estimates due to certain economic factors.
Fair Value Measurements: We follow fair value measurement guidance that defines fair value as the price that would be received for the sale of an
asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price). We have applied this
guidance to our Company’s derivative contracts that are not elected or designated as “normal purchases or normal sales” (normal), to marketable
securities held in trusts, to our investments in our Pension and PBOP Plans, and to nonfinancial assets such as goodwill and AROs. This guidance
was also applied in estimating the fair value of preferred stock and long-term debt.
Changes in fair value of the Regulated company derivative contracts are recorded as Regulatory Assets or Liabilities, as we recover the costs of these
contracts in rates charged to customers. These valuations are sensitive to the prices of energy and energy-related products in future years for which
markets have not yet developed and assumptions are made.
42
We use quoted market prices when available to determine the fair value of financial instruments. If quoted market prices are not available, fair value
is determined using quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments that are not active and
model-derived valuations. When quoted prices in active markets for the same or similar instruments are not available, we value derivative contracts
using models that incorporate both observable and unobservable inputs. Significant unobservable inputs utilized in the models include energy and
energy-related product prices for future years for long-dated derivative contracts and market volatilities. Discounted cash flow valuations incorporate
estimates of premiums or discounts, reflecting risk adjusted profit that would be required by a market participant to arrive at an exit price, using
available historical market transaction information. Valuations of derivative contracts also reflect our estimates of nonperformance risk, including
credit risk.
Other Matters
Accounting Standards: For information regarding new accounting standards, see Note 1C, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies -
Accounting Standards,” to the financial statements.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments: Information regarding our contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of
December 31, 2015 is summarized annually through 2020 and thereafter as follows:
Eversource
(Millions of Dollars)
Long-term debt maturities (a)
Estimated interest payments on existing debt (b)
Capital leases (c)
Operating leases (d)
Funding of pension obligations (d) (e)
Funding of PBOP obligations (d)
Estimated future annual long-term contractual costs (f)
Total (g)
CL&P
(Millions of Dollars)
Long-term debt maturities (a)
Estimated interest payments on existing debt (b)
Capital leases (c)
Operating leases (d)
Funding of pension obligations (d) (e)
Estimated future annual long-term contractual costs (f)
Total (g)
$
$
$
$
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Thereafter
200.0 $
371.2
2.2
16.4
146.0
9.5
684.5
1,429.8 $
745.0 $
366.6
2.1
13.8
167.5
9.2
590.6
1,894.8 $
960.0 $
313.1
2.1
10.4
114.5
9.4
442.3
1,851.8 $
800.0 $
284.2
2.0
8.5
70.6
9.6
376.2
1,551.1 $
295.0 $
245.8
2.0
6.8
20.2
-
344.9
914.7 $
5,736.6 $
2,849.6
1.4
15.4
-
-
2,371.7
10,974.7 $
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Thereafter
- $
140.0
1.9
2.9
0.4
279.4
424.6 $
250.0 $
136.0
1.9
2.0
15.5
207.9
613.3 $
300.0 $
117.8
2.0
1.3
26.3
159.5
606.9 $
250.0 $
102.4
2.0
1.0
21.1
126.9
503.4 $
- $
95.5
2.0
0.7
6.1
114.5
218.8 $
1,990.3 $
1,402.7
1.4
1.7
-
711.6
4,107.7 $
Total
8,736.6
4,430.5
11.8
71.3
518.8
37.7
4,810.2
18,616.9
Total
2,790.3
1,994.4
11.2
9.6
69.4
1,599.8
6,474.7
(a)
(b)
(c)
Long-term debt maturities exclude the CYAPC pre-1983 spent nuclear fuel obligation, net unamortized premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs, and other
fair value adjustments.
Estimated interest payments on fixed-rate debt are calculated by multiplying the coupon rate on the debt by its scheduled notional amount outstanding for the
period of measurement. Estimated interest payments on floating-rate debt are calculated by multiplying the end of 2015 floating-rate reset on the debt by its
scheduled notional amount outstanding for the period of measurement. This same rate is then assumed for the remaining life of the debt.
The capital lease obligations include interest.
(d) Amounts are not included on our balance sheets.
(e)
These amounts represent Eversource’s estimated pension contributions to its qualified Pension Plan. Contributions in 2017 through 2020 and thereafter will vary
depending on many factors, including the performance of existing plan assets, valuation of the plan’s liabilities and long-term discount rates, and are subject to
change.
(f) Other than certain derivative contracts held by the Regulated companies, these obligations are not included on our balance sheets.
(g) Does not include other long-term liabilities recorded on our balance sheet, such as environmental reserves, employee medical insurance, workers compensation
and long-term disability insurance reserves, ARO liability reserves and other reserves, as we cannot make reasonable estimates of the timing of payments. Also
does not include amounts not included on our balance sheets for future funding of the Access Northeast project or for a contingent commitment of approximately
$20 million to an energy investment fund, which would be invested under certain conditions, as we cannot make reasonable estimates of the periods or the
investment contributions.
For further information regarding our contractual obligations and commercial commitments, see Note 6, “Asset Retirement Obligations,” Note 7,
“Short-Term Debt,” Note 8, “Long-Term Debt,” Note 9A, “Employee Benefits - Pension Benefits and Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions,”
Note 11, “Commitments and Contingencies,” and Note 12, “Leases,” to the financial statements.
43
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – EVERSOURCE ENERGY AND SUBSIDIARIES
The following provides the amounts and variances in operating revenues and expense line items in the statements of income for Eversource for the
years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013 included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Comparison of 2015 to 2014:
(Millions of Dollars)
Operating Revenues
Operating Expenses:
Purchased Power, Fuel and Transmission
Operations and Maintenance
Depreciation
Amortization of Regulatory Assets, Net
Energy Efficiency Programs
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
Total Operating Expenses
Operating Income
Interest Expense
Other Income, Net
Income Before Income Tax Expense
Income Tax Expense
Net Income
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders
For the Years Ended December 31,
2015
2014
Increase/
(Decrease)
Percent
$
7,954.8 $
7,741.9 $
212.9
2.7 %
3,086.9
1,329.3
665.9
22.3
495.7
590.5
6,190.6
1,764.2
372.4
34.2
1,426.0
540.0
886.0
7.5
878.5
$
3,021.6
1,427.6
614.7
10.7
473.1
561.4
6,109.1
1,632.8
362.1
24.6
1,295.3
468.3
827.0
7.5
819.5 $
$
65.3
(98.3)
51.2
11.6
22.6
29.1
81.5
131.4
10.3
9.6
130.7
71.7
59.0
-
59.0
2.2
(6.9)
8.3
(a)
4.8
5.2
1.3
8.0
2.8
39.0
10.1
15.3
7.1
-
7.2 %
(a) Percent greater than 100 percent not shown as it is not meaningful.
Operating Revenues
(Millions of Dollars)
Electric Distribution
Natural Gas Distribution
Electric Transmission
Other and Eliminations
Total Operating Revenues
For the Years Ended December 31,
2015
2014
5,903.6 $
995.5
1,069.1
(13.4)
7,954.8 $
5,663.4 $
1,007.3
1,018.2
53.0
7,741.9 $
$
$
Increase /
(Decrease)
Percent
240.2
(11.8)
50.9
(66.4)
212.9
4.2 %
(1.2)
5.0
(a)
2.7 %
(a) Percent greater than 100 percent not shown as it is not meaningful.
A summary of our retail electric sales volumes and firm natural gas sales volumes were as follows:
Electric Sales Volumes in GWh:
Traditional
Decoupled
Total Electric Sales Volumes in GWh
For the Years Ended December 31,
2015
2014
Increase/
(Decrease)
Percent
28,982
25,634
54,616
28,811
25,631
54,442
171
3
174
0.6 %
-
0.3 %
Firm Natural Gas Sales Volumes in Million Cubic Feet
102,999
104,191
(1,192)
(1.1)%
Operating Revenues, which primarily consist of base electric and natural gas distribution revenues and tracked revenues further described below,
increased by $212.9 million in the aggregate in 2015 compared to 2014.
Base electric and natural gas distribution revenues: Base electric distribution segment revenues increased $150.9 million due primarily to CL&P’s
base distribution rate increase, effective December 1, 2014 ($136.3 million) and higher retail sales volumes driven by weather impacts at our non-
decoupled operating companies (traditional). In addition, Operating Revenues increased $19.9 million at CL&P due to the PURA-approved
settlement agreement regarding ADIT, $11 million for the Comprehensive Settlement Agreement associated with the recovery of LBR related to
2009 through 2011 energy efficiency programs at NSTAR Electric, and $20.7 million increase of 2015 LBR recognition at NSTAR Electric
compared to 2014 LBR amounts. The $19.9 million represents CL&P’s revenue requirement from the settlement agreement’s rate increase through
December 31, 2015, and is being collected from customers in rates over a 24-month period beginning December 1, 2015. The impact of colder
winter weather experienced in the first quarter of 2015 and warmer weather in the third quarter of 2015, partially offset by milder winter weather in
the fourth quarter of 2015, all as compared to the same periods in 2014, were the primary drivers of the increase in 2015 retail electric sales volumes
of 0.6 percent and base electric distribution revenues at NSTAR Electric and PSNH.
For CL&P (effective December 1, 2014) and WMECO, fluctuations in retail electric sales volumes do not impact earnings due to their respective
regulatory commission approved revenue decoupling mechanisms. The revenue decoupling mechanisms permit recovery of a base amount of
distribution revenues and break the relationship between sales volumes and revenues recognized. Revenue decoupling mechanisms result in the
44
recovery of our approved base distribution revenue requirements. Therefore, changes in sales volumes had no impact on the level of base distribution
revenue realized at our decoupled companies.
Firm natural gas base distribution segment revenues decreased $4.9 million due primarily to a 1.1 percent decrease in firm natural gas sales volumes
in 2015, as compared to 2014. This was due to record warm weather in the fourth quarter of 2015 when compared to 2014, partially offset by colder
winter weather in the first quarter of 2015 compared to 2014. Weather-normalized firm natural gas sales volumes (based on 30-year average
temperatures) increased 2.5 percent in 2015 compared to 2014, due primarily to improved economic conditions as well as residential and commercial
customer growth, partially offset by the impact of customer conservation efforts resulting from company-sponsored energy efficiency programs.
Tracked distribution revenues: Tracked revenues consist of certain costs that are recovered from customers in rates through regulatory commission-
approved cost tracking mechanisms and therefore have no impact on earnings. Costs recovered through cost tracking mechanisms include energy
supply procurement costs and other energy-related costs for our electric and natural gas customers, retail transmission charges, energy efficiency
program costs, and restructuring and stranded cost recovery revenues. Tracked electric distribution segment revenues increased primarily as a result
of increases in energy supply costs ($176.4 million), driven by increased average retail rates, and increases in energy efficiency program revenues
($18.3 million). These increases were partially offset by a decrease in retail electric transmission charges ($77.5 million) and a decrease in the
federally mandated congestion charge primarily driven by refunds in 2015 for a prior year overrecovery ($103.9 million). Tracked natural gas supply
revenues decreased $20.1 million as a result of a decrease in average rates related to the recovery of natural gas supply costs.
Electric transmission revenues: The electric transmission segment revenues increased by $50.9 million due primarily to the result of lower reserves
associated with the FERC ROE complaint proceedings in 2015 compared to 2014 and higher revenue requirements associated with ongoing
investments in our transmission infrastructure.
Other: Other revenues decreased due primarily to the sale of Eversource’s unregulated contracting business on April 13, 2015 ($55 million).
Purchased Power, Fuel and Transmission expense includes costs associated with purchasing electricity and natural gas on behalf of our customers.
These energy supply costs are recovered from customers in rates through reconciling cost tracking mechanisms, which have no impact on earnings
(tracked costs). Purchased Power, Fuel and Transmission increased in 2015, as compared to 2014, due primarily to the following:
(Millions of Dollars)
Electric Distribution
Natural Gas Distribution
Electric Transmission
Other and Eliminations
Total Purchased Power, Fuel and Transmission
Increase/(Decrease)
74.8
(1.6)
2.8
(10.7)
65.3
$
$
The increase in purchased power costs at the electric distribution business was driven by higher prices associated with the procurement of energy
supply in 2015, as compared to 2014. The decrease in purchased power costs at the natural gas distribution business was due to lower average
natural gas prices in 2015, as compared to 2014.
Operations and Maintenance expense includes tracked costs and costs that are part of base electric and natural gas distribution rates with changes
impacting earnings (non-tracked costs). Operations and Maintenance decreased in 2015, as compared to 2014, due primarily to the following:
(Millions of Dollars)
Base Electric Distribution:
Resolution of basic service bad debt adder mechanism at NSTAR Electric
Contribution to create clean energy fund in connection with the generation
divestiture agreement at PSNH
Increase in employee-related expenses, including labor and benefits
Other operations and maintenance
Total Base Electric Distribution
Total Base Natural Gas Distribution
Total Tracked costs (Transmission and Electric and Natural Gas Distribution)
Total Distribution and Transmission
Other and eliminations:
Integration costs
Absence of Eversource’s unregulated electrical contracting business due to sale
in April 2015, net
Merger-related costs allowed for recovery
ES Parent and Other Companies
Total Operations and Maintenance
$
$
Increase/(Decrease)
(24.2)
5.0
1.8
7.0
(10.4)
(1.5)
(9.3)
(21.2)
(8.4)
(45.7)
(7.0)
(16.0)
(98.3)
Depreciation increased in 2015, as compared to 2014, due primarily to higher utility plant in service balances resulting from completed construction
projects placed into service and an increase in depreciation rates at CL&P as a result of the distribution rate case effective December 1, 2014.
45
Amortization of Regulatory Assets, Net, which are tracked costs, include certain regulatory-approved tracking mechanisms. Fluctuations in these
costs are recovered from customers in rates and have no impact on earnings. Amortization of Regulatory Assets, Net, increased in 2015, as
compared to 2014, due primarily to the following:
(Millions of Dollars)
CL&P:
Amortization increase (including storm cost recovery) approved and included in
base distribution rates
Energy and energy-related supply costs tracking mechanism
NSTAR Electric (primarily the recognition of the Comprehensive Settlement
Agreement, partially offset by transition costs tracking mechanism)
PSNH (primarily default energy service charge tracking mechanism)
WMECO (primarily the absence of the refund of DOE proceeds to customers in 2014
and energy and energy-related cost tracking mechanisms)
Other
Total Amortization of Regulatory Assets, Net
$
$
Increase/(Decrease)
61.0
(108.0)
(6.7)
45.9
20.7
(1.3)
11.6
The increase in CL&P’s amortization was due primarily to an increase in storm cost recovery, which was approved and included in distribution rates
effective December 1, 2014. In connection with the Comprehensive Settlement Agreement associated with the CPSL program filings, NSTAR
Electric recognized an $11.7 million benefit in the first quarter of 2015, which was recorded as a reduction to amortization expense.
The remaining fluctuations in amortization expense are driven by the deferral of energy supply and energy-related costs, which can fluctuate from
period to period based on the timing of costs incurred and related rate changes to recover these costs. Fluctuations in energy supply and energy-
related costs, which are the primary drivers in amortization, are recovered from customers in rates and have no impact on earnings.
Energy Efficiency Programs, which are tracked costs, increased in 2015, as compared to 2014, due primarily to an increase in energy efficiency
costs in accordance with the three-year program guidelines established by the DPU at NSTAR Electric.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes increased in 2015, as compared to 2014, due primarily to an increase in property taxes as a result of both an
increase in utility plant balances and property tax rates.
Interest Expense increased in 2015, as compared to 2014, due primarily to an increase in interest on long-term debt ($9.3 million) as a result of new
debt issuances in 2015 and an increase in interest on notes payable ($1.9 million).
Other Income, Net increased in 2015, as compared to 2014, due primarily to higher equity AFUDC amounts ($5.1 million) and an increase in
interest income related to the deferred compensation plans ($4.3 million), partially offset by the absence in 2015 of a gain on the sale of land
recorded in 2014 at CL&P ($4.5 million).
Income Tax Expense increased in 2015, as compared to 2014, due primarily to higher pre-tax earnings ($45.7 million), higher state taxes, the impact
of adjusting our estimated tax expense to what was filed on our tax return (provision to return), the lower tax benefit in 2015 compared to 2014 from
a change in tax reserves ($19.8 million), and higher items that impact our tax rate as a result of regulatory treatment (flow-through items) ($6.2
million).
46
Comparison of 2014 to 2013:
(Millions of Dollars)
Operating Revenues
Operating Expenses:
Purchased Power, Fuel and Transmission
Operations and Maintenance
Depreciation
Amortization of Regulatory Assets, Net
Amortization of Rate Reduction Bonds
Energy Efficiency Programs
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
Total Operating Expenses
Operating Income
Interest Expense
Other Income, Net
Income Before Income Tax Expense
Income Tax Expense
Net Income
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
Net Income Attributable to Controlling Interest
Operating Revenues
(Millions of Dollars)
Electric Distribution
Natural Gas Distribution
Transmission
Other and Eliminations
Total Operating Revenues
For the Years Ended December 31,
2014
2013
Increase/
(Decrease)
Percent
$
7,741.9 $
7,301.2 $
440.7
6.0 %
3,021.6
1,427.6
614.7
10.7
-
473.1
561.4
6,109.1
1,632.8
362.1
24.6
1,295.3
468.3
827.0
7.5
819.5
$
2,483.0
1,515.0
610.8
206.3
42.6
401.9
512.2
5,771.8
1,529.4
338.7
29.9
1,220.6
426.9
793.7
7.7
786.0 $
538.6
(87.4)
3.9
(195.6)
(42.6)
71.2
49.2
337.3
103.4
23.4
(5.3)
74.7
41.4
33.3
(0.2)
33.5
21.7
(5.8)
0.6
(94.8)
(100.0)
17.7
9.6
5.8
6.8
6.9
(17.7)
6.1
9.7
4.2
(2.6)
4.3 %
For the Years Ended December 31,
2014
2013
5,663.4 $
1,007.3
1,018.2
53.0
7,741.9 $
5,362.3 $
855.8
978.7
104.4
7,301.2 $
Increase /
(Decrease)
Percent
301.1
151.5
39.5
(51.4)
440.7
5.6 %
17.7
4.0
(49.2)
6.0 %
$
$
$
A summary of our retail electric sales volumes and firm natural gas sales volumes were as follows:
Retail Electric Sales Volumes in GWh
Firm Natural Gas Sales Volumes in Million Cubic Feet
For the Years Ended December 31,
2014
54,442
104,191
2013
55,331
98,258
Increase/
(Decrease)
(889)
5,933
Percent
(1.6)%
6.0
Operating Revenues increased $440.7 million in 2014 compared to 2013.
The most significant factor in the increase in revenues relates to cost tracking mechanisms for the recovery of higher costs associated with the
procurement of energy supply, which increased $506.8 million and $126.9 million for electric distribution and natural gas distribution, respectively.
These costs were impacted by the overall New England wholesale energy supply market in which higher natural gas delivery costs had an adverse
impact on the cost of electric energy purchased for our retail electric customers and the cost of natural gas purchased on behalf of our retail natural
gas customers. Energy supply costs are recovered from customers in rates through cost tracking mechanisms and therefore have no impact on
earnings. These costs and related recovery impacts were partially offset by decreases in transition cost recovery revenues, which are recovered
through cost tracking mechanisms, reflecting the full collection in 2013 of previously deferred costs, as well as the full amortization of RRBs.
Firm base natural gas distribution revenues increased $26.3 million in 2014, as compared to 2013, which reflected a 6 percent increase in firm natural
gas sales volumes. The increase in sales volumes was driven primarily by the colder winter weather experienced throughout our service territories in
the first quarter of 2014. The weather conditions experienced were significantly colder than both normal and the same period last year throughout
New England and our service territories in Connecticut and Massachusetts. Weather-normalized total firm natural gas sales volumes (based on 30-
year average temperatures) increased 2.9 percent in 2014, as compared to 2013, due primarily to residential and commercial customer growth.
Base electric distribution revenues decreased $12.1 million in 2014 compared to 2013. This reflected the impact of a 1.6 percent decrease in retail
electric sales volumes. The decrease in sales volumes was driven primarily by the cooler summer weather in 2014 compared to 2013, as well as the
impact of our utility-sponsored energy efficiency programs. Weather-normalized retail electric sales volumes decreased 1 percent in 2014, as
compared to 2013, reflecting the impact of our utility-sponsored energy efficiency programs. The negative sales volume impact was partially offset
by the impact of CL&P’s base distribution rate increase effective December 1, 2014.
47
CL&P and NSTAR Electric recognized lost base revenue (LBR) related to reductions in sales volume as a result of energy efficiency. LBR is
recovered from retail distribution customers. Including the impact from the recognition of LBR, base distribution revenues increased in 2014, as
compared to 2013. We recognized $45.2 million of LBR in 2014, compared to $20.3 million in 2013. Effective December 1, 2014, CL&P no longer
recognizes LBR due to its revenue decoupling mechanism, which, similar to WMECO’s revenue decoupling mechanism, provides a base amount of
distribution revenues ($1.059 billion on an annual basis) that effectively breaks the relationship between revenues and customer electricity usage.
The revenue decoupling mechanism is designed to allow each of CL&P and WMECO to encourage energy efficiency for its customers without
negatively impacting its revenues.
Transmission revenues increased $39.5 million in 2014, as compared to 2013, due primarily to the recovery of higher revenue requirements
associated with ongoing investments in our transmission infrastructure. This increase was partially offset by the impact of the $37 million net reserve
recorded in 2014 as a result of the 2014 FERC ROE orders, compared to the $23.7 million reserve recorded in 2013 for the FERC ALJ initial
decision in the FERC base ROE complaints.
Purchased Power, Fuel and Transmission expense includes costs associated with purchasing electricity and natural gas on behalf of our customers.
These energy supply costs are recovered from customers in rates through reconciling cost tracking mechanisms, which have no impact on earnings
(tracked costs). Purchased Power, Fuel and Transmission increased in 2014, as compared to 2013, due primarily to the following:
(Millions of Dollars)
Electric Distribution
Natural Gas Distribution
Transmission
Other and Eliminations
Total Purchased Power, Fuel and Transmission
Increase/(Decrease)
458.2
104.1
(2.8)
(20.9)
538.6
$
$
The increase in purchased power, fuel and transmission at the electric and natural gas distribution businesses were driven by the higher costs
associated with the procurement of energy supply. As a result of increases in the New England wholesale energy supply market for both electricity
and natural gas, the costs incurred to purchase energy on behalf of our customers were significantly higher in 2014 compared to 2013. Our energy
supply costs were impacted by higher natural gas delivery costs, which had an adverse impact on the cost of electric energy purchased for our retail
electric customers and the cost of natural gas purchased on behalf of our retail natural gas customers.
Operations and Maintenance expense includes tracked costs and costs that are recovered through base electric and natural gas distribution rates,
which therefore impact earnings (non-tracked costs). Operations and Maintenance decreased in 2014, as compared to 2013, due primarily to the
following:
(Millions of Dollars)
Base Electric Distribution:
Labor and other employee-related costs, including pension costs
Implementation of a new outage restoration program at CL&P
Storm restoration costs
All other operations and maintenance
Total Base Electric Distribution
Total Base Natural Gas Distribution
Total Tracked costs (Transmission and Electric and Natural Gas Distribution)
Total Distribution and Transmission
Other and eliminations:
Integration and severance costs
All other (including eliminations)
Total Operations and Maintenance
$
$
Increase/(Decrease)
(77.3)
9.2
(11.4)
(29.4)
(108.9)
(0.9)
16.6
(93.2)
13.3
(7.5)
(87.4)
Depreciation increased in 2014, as compared to 2013, due primarily to an increase related to higher utility plant balances resulting from completed
construction projects placed into service ($34.5 million), partially offset by a decrease in the CYAPC and YAEC decommissioning costs, which do
not impact earnings ($30.6 million).
Amortization of Regulatory Assets, Net, which are tracked costs, include certain regulatory-approved tracking mechanisms. Fluctuations in these
costs are recovered from customers in rates and have no impact on earnings. Amortization of Regulatory Assets, Net, decreased in 2014, as
compared to 2013, due primarily to the following:
(Millions of Dollars)
NSTAR Electric (primarily recovery of transition costs)
PSNH (primarily default energy service charge)
CL&P (primarily energy supply and energy-related costs)
WMECO (primarily recovery of transition costs)
Other
Total Amortization of Regulatory Assets, Net
Increase/(Decrease)
(236.4)
(9.2)
54.4
(3.0)
(1.4)
(195.6)
$
$
Amortization of Rate Reduction Bonds decreased in 2014, as compared to 2013, due to the maturity in 2013 of RRBs of NSTAR Electric, PSNH
and WMECO.
48
Energy Efficiency Programs, which are tracked costs, increased in 2014, as compared to 2013, due primarily to the expanded energy conservation
programs at CL&P in 2014 as a result of 2013 legislative action, and an increase in energy efficiency costs in accordance with the three-year program
guidelines established by the DPU at NSTAR Electric and WMECO, partially offset by a decrease in the amortization of previously deferred costs at
NSTAR Electric.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes increased in 2014, as compared to 2013, due primarily to an increase in property taxes as a result of both an
increase in utility plant balances and property tax rates.
Interest Expense increased in 2014, as compared to 2013, due primarily to lower interest income related to a decrease in the recovery of previously
deferred transition costs ($9.9 million), an increase in interest on long-term debt ($4 million) as a result of new debt issuances in 2014 and the
absence in 2014 of the favorable impact from the resolution of a Connecticut state income tax audit in 2013.
Other Income, Net decreased in 2014, as compared to 2013, due primarily to lower unrealized gains on the assets supporting the deferred
compensation plans ($13 million), and the absence in 2014 of an insurance policy claim received in 2013 ($1.5 million), partially offset by higher
AFUDC related to equity funds ($6.6 million), and a net gain on the sale of land ($4.5 million).
Income Tax Expense increased in 2014, as compared to 2013, due primarily to higher pre-tax earnings ($26.1 million), and higher state taxes and
various other impacts ($15.3 million). The higher state taxes include a net reduction in the valuation allowance for state tax positions, which is based
on the most recent available data.
EARNINGS SUMMARY
Excluding the impact of integration costs, our 2014 earnings increased by $41.8 million, as compared to 2013. The increase was due primarily to
lower operations and maintenance costs that impact earnings, which were primarily driven by lower labor and other employee-related costs,
including approximately $30 million of non-tracked pension costs, and lower storm restoration costs, as well as higher firm natural gas sales volumes
as a result of the colder weather in the first quarter of 2014, as compared to the first quarter of 2013. Partially offsetting this increase was the absence
in 2014 of a favorable impact from the resolution of a state income tax audit in 2013, higher property taxes, higher depreciation expense at our
regulated companies, and lower retail electric sales volumes as a result of cooler summer weather in 2014, as compared to the same period in 2013.
Earnings were also unfavorably impacted by the 2014 after-tax net reserve of $22.4 million related to the 2014 FERC ROE orders, as compared to
the 2013 after-tax reserve of $14.3 million related to the 2013 FERC ALJ initial decision in the FERC base ROE complaints.
Our electric distribution segment earnings increased $35.4 million in 2014, as compared to 2013, due primarily to lower operations and maintenance
costs that impact earnings, which were primarily driven by lower labor and other employee-related costs, including pension costs, and lower storm
restoration costs. Partially offsetting these favorable earnings impacts, as compared to 2013, were higher property taxes and depreciation expense,
lower retail electric sales volumes as a result of cooler summer weather in 2014, and the absence in 2014 of regulatory interest income on stranded
cost deferrals in 2013.
Our transmission segment earnings increased $8.4 million in 2014, as compared to 2013, due primarily to a decrease in transmission segment state
income tax expense and a higher transmission rate base as a result of an increased investment in our transmission infrastructure. These favorable
impacts were partially offset by the after-tax net reserve of $22.4 million related to the 2014 FERC ROE orders, as compared to the $14.3 million
after-tax reserve related to the 2013 FERC ALJ initial decision in the FERC base ROE complaints.
Our natural gas distribution segment earnings increased $11.4 million in 2014, as compared to 2013, due primarily to higher firm natural gas sales
volumes and peak demand revenues resulting from colder weather in the first quarter of 2014 and additional natural gas heating customers.
ES parent and other companies, which include our unregulated businesses, had a net loss of $10.6 million in 2014, compared with earnings of $11.1
million in 2013. Excluding the impact of integration costs, ES parent and other companies earned $11.5 million in 2014, compared with $24.9
million in 2013. The earnings decrease in 2014 was due primarily to a higher effective tax rate.
LIQUIDITY
Cash flows provided by operating activities totaled $1.64 billion in 2014, compared with $1.66 billion in 2013. The 2014 operating cash flows were
favorably impacted by approximately $132 million in DOE Damages proceeds resulting from the spent nuclear fuel litigation received by CL&P,
NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO from the Yankee Companies, the absence of 2013 cash disbursements for major storm restoration costs, the
decrease of approximately $130 million in Pension and PBOP Plan cash contributions and changes in the timing of working capital items. These
favorable impacts were more than offset by higher income tax payments in 2014 and the unfavorable cash flow impact resulting from lower
recoveries from customers in 2014, as compared to 2013, relating to regulatory cost recovery tracking mechanisms. For further information on the
spent nuclear fuel litigation, see Note 11C, “Commitments and Contingencies – Contractual Obligations – Yankee Companies,” in this combined
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Results of Operations for each of CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO have been omitted from this report but are set forth in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2015 filed with the SEC on a combined basis with Eversource Energy on February 26, 2016. Such report is
also available in the Investors section at www.eversource.com.
49
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Market Risk Information
Commodity Price Risk Management: Our Regulated companies enter into energy contracts to serve our customers and the economic impacts of those
contracts are passed on to our customers. Accordingly, the Regulated companies have no exposure to loss of future earnings or fair values due to
these market risk-sensitive instruments. Eversource’s Energy Supply Risk Committee, comprised of senior officers, reviews and approves all large
scale energy related transactions entered into by its Regulated companies.
Other Risk Management Activities
We have an Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) program for identifying the principal risks of the Company. Our ERM program involves the
application of a well-defined, enterprise-wide methodology designed to allow our Risk Committee, comprised of our senior officers and directors of
the Company, to identify, categorize, prioritize, and mitigate the principal risks to the Company. The ERM program is integrated with other
assurance functions throughout the Company including Compliance, Auditing, and Insurance to ensure appropriate coverage of risks that could
impact the Company. In addition to known risks, ERM identifies emerging risks to the Company, through participation in industry groups,
discussions with management and in consultation with outside advisers. Our management then analyzes risks to determine materiality, likelihood
and impact, and develops mitigation strategies. Management broadly considers our business model, the utility industry, the global economy and the
current environment to identify risks. The Finance Committee of the Board of Trustees is responsible for oversight of the Company’s ERM program
and enterprise-wide risks as well as specific risks associated with insurance, credit, financing, investments, pensions and overall system security
including cyber security. The findings of the ERM process are periodically discussed with the Finance Committee of our Board of Trustees, as well
as with other Board Committees or the full Board of Trustees, as appropriate, including reporting on how these issues are being measured and
managed. However, there can be no assurances that the Enterprise Risk Management process will identify or manage every risk or event that could
impact our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Interest Rate Risk Management: We manage our interest rate risk exposure in accordance with our written policies and procedures by maintaining a
mix of fixed and variable rate long-term debt. As of December 31, 2015, approximately 95 percent of our long-term debt, including fees and interest
due for CYAPC’s spent nuclear fuel disposal costs, was at a fixed interest rate. The remaining long-term debt is at variable interest rates and is
subject to interest rate risk that could result in earnings volatility. Assuming a one percentage point increase in our variable interest rates, annual
interest expense would have increased by a pre-tax amount of $4.7 million.
Credit Risk Management: Credit risk relates to the risk of loss that we would incur as a result of non-performance by counterparties pursuant to the
terms of our contractual obligations. We serve a wide variety of customers and transact with suppliers that include IPPs, industrial companies,
natural gas and electric utilities, oil and gas producers, financial institutions, and other energy marketers. Margin accounts exist within this diverse
group, and we realize interest receipts and payments related to balances outstanding in these margin accounts. This wide customer and supplier mix
generates a need for a variety of contractual structures, products and terms that, in turn, require us to manage the portfolio of market risk inherent in
those transactions in a manner consistent with the parameters established by our risk management process.
Our Regulated companies are subject to credit risk from certain long-term or high-volume supply contracts with energy marketing companies. Our
Regulated companies manage the credit risk with these counterparties in accordance with established credit risk practices and monitor contracting
risks, including credit risk. As of December 31, 2015, our Regulated companies did not hold collateral (letters of credit) from counterparties related
to our standard service contracts. As of December 31, 2015, Eversource had $17.1 million of cash posted with ISO-NE related to energy purchase
transactions.
For further information on cash collateral deposited and posted with counterparties, see Note 1G, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies -
Deposits,” and Note 4, “Derivative Instruments,” to the financial statements.
If the respective unsecured debt ratings of Eversource or its subsidiaries were reduced to below investment grade by either Moody’s or S&P, certain
of Eversource’s contracts would require additional collateral in the form of cash to be provided to counterparties and independent system operators.
Eversource would have been and remains able to provide that collateral.
50
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Eversource
Company Report on Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Financial Statements
51
Company Report on Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
Eversource Energy
Management is responsible for the preparation, integrity, and fair presentation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Eversource
Energy and subsidiaries (Eversource or the Company) and of other sections of this annual report. Eversource’s internal controls over financial
reporting were audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP.
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal controls over financial reporting. The Company’s internal control
framework and processes have been designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. There are
inherent limitations of internal controls over financial reporting that could allow material misstatements due to error or fraud to occur and not be
prevented or detected on a timely basis by employees during the normal course of business. Additionally, internal controls over financial reporting
may become inadequate in the future due to changes in the business environment.
Under the supervision and with the participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, Eversource conducted an evaluation
of the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013)
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this evaluation under the framework in
COSO, management concluded that internal controls over financial reporting were effective as of December 31, 2015.
February 26, 2016
52
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Trustees and Shareholders of Eversource Energy:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Eversource Energy and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2015
and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, common shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2015. Our audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15 of Part
IV. We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal
Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s
management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedules, for maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Company Report on
Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement
schedules and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement
and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial
reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing
and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and
principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other
personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies
and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management
override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any
evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Eversource
Energy and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2015, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion,
such financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all
material respects, the information set forth therein. Also, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
February 26, 2016
53
EVERSOURCE ENERGY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Thousands of Dollars)
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Receivables, Net
Unbilled Revenues
Taxes Receivable
Fuel, Materials and Supplies
Regulatory Assets
Prepayments and Other Current Assets
Total Current Assets
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
Deferred Debits and Other Assets:
Regulatory Assets
Goodwill
Marketable Securities
Other Long-Term Assets
Total Deferred Debits and Other Assets
Total Assets
LIABILITIES AND CAPITALIZATION
Current Liabilities:
Notes Payable
Long-Term Debt - Current Portion
Accounts Payable
Regulatory Liabilities
Accumulated Deferred Income Taxes
Other Current Liabilities
Total Current Liabilities
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities:
Accumulated Deferred Income Taxes
Regulatory Liabilities
Derivative Liabilities
Accrued Pension, SERP and PBOP
Other Long-Term Liabilities
Total Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities
Capitalization:
Long-Term Debt
Noncontrolling Interest - Preferred Stock of Subsidiaries
Equity:
Common Shareholders’ Equity:
Common Shares
Capital Surplus, Paid In
Retained Earnings
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Treasury Stock
Common Shareholders’ Equity
Total Capitalization
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 11)
Total Liabilities and Capitalization
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
54
$
$
$
As of December 31,
2015
2014
$
23,947
775,480
202,647
305,359
336,476
845,843
129,034
2,618,786
38,703
856,346
211,758
337,307
349,664
672,493
226,194
2,692,465
19,892,441
18,647,041
3,737,960
3,519,401
516,478
295,243
8,069,082
4,054,086
3,519,401
515,025
312,369
8,400,881
30,580,309
$
29,740,387
$
1,160,953
228,883
813,646
107,759
-
678,549
2,989,790
5,147,678
513,595
337,102
1,407,288
871,499
8,277,162
8,805,574
155,568
1,669,313
6,262,368
2,797,355
(66,844)
(309,977)
10,352,215
19,313,357
956,825
245,583
868,231
235,022
160,288
668,432
3,134,381
4,467,473
515,144
409,632
1,638,558
874,387
7,905,194
8,568,429
155,568
1,666,796
6,235,834
2,448,661
(74,009)
(300,467)
9,976,815
18,700,812
$
30,580,309
$
29,740,387
EVERSOURCE ENERGY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Thousands of Dollars, Except Share Information)
2015
For the Years Ended December 31,
2014
2013
Operating Revenues
$
7,954,827
$
7,741,856
$
7,301,204
Operating Expenses:
Purchased Power, Fuel and Transmission
Operations and Maintenance
Depreciation
Amortization of Regulatory Assets, Net
Amortization of Rate Reduction Bonds
Energy Efficiency Programs
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
Total Operating Expenses
Operating Income
Interest Expense
Other Income, Net
Income Before Income Tax Expense
Income Tax Expense
Net Income
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders
Basic Earnings Per Common Share
Diluted Earnings Per Common Share
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding:
Basic
Diluted
3,086,905
1,329,289
665,856
22,339
-
495,701
590,573
6,190,663
1,764,164
372,420
34,227
1,425,971
539,967
886,004
7,519
878,485
2.77
2.76
3,021,550
1,427,589
614,657
10,704
-
473,127
561,380
6,109,007
1,632,849
362,106
24,619
1,295,362
468,297
827,065
7,519
819,546
2.59
2.58
2,482,954
1,514,986
610,777
206,322
42,581
401,919
512,230
5,771,769
1,529,435
338,699
29,894
1,220,630
426,941
793,689
7,682
786,007
2.49
2.49
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
317,336,881
318,432,687
316,136,748
317,417,414
315,311,387
316,211,160
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Net Income
Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss), Net of Tax:
Qualified Cash Flow Hedging Instruments
Changes in Unrealized (Losses)/Gains on Marketable Securities
Changes in Funded Status of Pension, SERP and PBOP Benefit Plans
Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss), Net of Tax
Comprehensive Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
Comprehensive Income Attributable to Common Shareholders
$
886,004
$
827,065
$
793,689
2,079
(2,588)
7,674
7,165
(7,519)
885,650
$
2,037
315
(30,330)
(27,978)
(7,519)
791,568
$
2,049
(940)
25,714
26,823
(7,682)
812,830
$
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
55
12,087
(326,537)
Treasury
Stock
$ (338,624)
Total
Common
Shareholders’
Equity
$ 9,237,050
793,689
(462,741)
(7,682)
11,078
(10,748)
29,468
(5,409)
26,823
9,611,528
827,065
(496,524)
(7,519)
6,609
(9,569)
63,887
9,316
(27,978)
9,976,815
886,004
(529,791)
(7,519)
9,468
(6,140)
12,560
3,653
7,165
$ (309,977) $ 10,352,215
(300,467)
26,070
(9,510)
EVERSOURCE ENERGY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMMON SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Thousands of Dollars, Except Share Information)
Balance as of January 1, 2013
Net Income
Dividends on Common Shares - $1.47 Per Share
Dividends on Preferred Stock
Issuance of Common Shares, $5 Par Value
Long-Term Incentive Plan Activity
Issuance of Treasury Shares
Other Changes in Shareholders’ Equity
Other Comprehensive Income
Balance as of December 31, 2013
Net Income
Dividends on Common Shares - $1.57 Per Share
Dividends on Preferred Stock
Issuance of Common Shares, $5 Par Value
Long-Term Incentive Plan Activity
Issuance of Treasury Shares
Other Changes in Shareholders’ Equity
Other Comprehensive Loss
Balance as of December 31, 2014
Net Income
Dividends on Common Shares - $1.67 Per Share
Dividends on Preferred Stock
Issuance of Common Shares, $5 Par Value
Long-Term Incentive Plan Activity
Increase in Treasury Shares
Other Changes in Shareholders’ Equity
Other Comprehensive Income
Balance as of December 31, 2015
Common Shares
Shares
314,053,634
Amount
$ 1,662,547
Capital
Surplus,
Paid In
$ 6,183,267
560,848
2,804
659,077
8,274
(10,748)
17,381
(5,409)
315,273,559
1,665,351
6,192,765
288,941
1,445
1,420,837
5,164
(9,569)
37,817
9,657
316,983,337
1,666,796
6,235,834
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income/(Loss)
$ (72,854)
Retained
Earnings
$ 1,802,714
793,689
(462,741)
(7,682)
26,823
(46,031)
(27,978)
(74,009)
2,125,980
827,065
(496,524)
(7,519)
(341)
2,448,661
886,004
(529,791)
(7,519)
503,443
2,517
(295,531)
6,951
(6,140)
22,070
3,653
317,191,249
$ 1,669,313
$ 6,262,368
$ 2,797,355
7,165
$ (66,844)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
56
EVERSOURCE ENERGY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Thousands of Dollars)
Operating Activities:
Net Income
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Flows
Provided by Operating Activities:
Depreciation
Deferred Income Taxes
Pension, SERP and PBOP Expense
Pension and PBOP Contributions
Regulatory (Under)/Over Recoveries, Net
Amortization of Regulatory Assets, Net
Amortization of Rate Reduction Bonds
(Payments)/Refunds Related to Spent Nuclear Fuel, Net
Other
Changes in Current Assets and Liabilities:
Receivables and Unbilled Revenues, Net
Fuel, Materials and Supplies
Taxes Receivable/Accrued, Net
Accounts Payable
Other Current Assets and Liabilities, Net
Net Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities
Investing Activities:
Investments in Property, Plant and Equipment
Proceeds from Sales of Marketable Securities
Purchases of Marketable Securities
Other Investing Activities
Net Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities
Financing Activities:
Cash Dividends on Common Shares
Cash Dividends on Preferred Stock
(Decrease)/Increase in Short-Term Debt
Issuance of Long-Term Debt
Retirements of Long-Term Debt
Retirements of Rate Reduction Bonds
Other Financing Activities
Net Cash Flows Provided by/(Used in) Financing Activities
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and Cash Equivalents - Beginning of Year
Cash and Cash Equivalents - End of Year
2015
For the Years Ended December 31,
2014
2013
$
886,004
$
827,065
$
793,689
665,856
491,736
96,017
(162,452)
(163,287)
22,339
-
(297,253)
(91,945)
(39,797)
34,112
30,282
(91,618)
44,031
1,424,025
(1,724,139)
799,165
(717,114)
(17,062)
(1,659,150)
(529,791)
(7,519)
(242,122)
1,225,000
(216,700)
-
(8,499)
220,369
(14,756)
38,703
23,947
$
614,657
443,259
99,056
(211,649)
6,853
10,704
-
132,138
39,523
(122,139)
(41,310)
(323,224)
144,743
15,797
1,635,473
(1,603,744)
488,789
(491,220)
14,380
(1,591,795)
(475,227)
(7,519)
285,075
725,000
(576,551)
-
883
(48,339)
(4,661)
43,364
38,703
$
610,777
431,413
195,698
(342,184)
(24,276)
206,322
42,581
-
56,071
(163,549)
(14,811)
(50,950)
(54,619)
(22,623)
1,663,539
(1,456,787)
627,532
(679,784)
67,816
(1,441,223)
(462,741)
(7,682)
(397,000)
1,680,000
(929,885)
(82,139)
(25,253)
(224,700)
(2,384)
45,748
43,364
$
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
The 2015 financial statements for CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO have been omitted from this report but are set forth in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2015 filed with the SEC on a combined basis with Eversource Energy on February 26, 2016. Such report is
also available in the Investors section at www.eversource.com.
57
EVERSOURCE ENERGY AND SUBSIDIARIES
THE CONNECTICUT LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY
NSTAR ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE AND SUBSIDIARY
WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC COMPANY
COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Refer to the Glossary of Terms included in this combined Annual Report on Form 10-K for abbreviations and acronyms used throughout the
combined notes to the financial statements.
1.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
About Eversource, CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO
A.
Eversource Energy: Eversource Energy is a public utility holding company primarily engaged, through its wholly owned regulated utility
subsidiaries, in the energy delivery business. Eversource Energy’s wholly owned regulated utility subsidiaries consist of CL&P, NSTAR Electric,
PSNH, WMECO, Yankee Gas and NSTAR Gas. Eversource provides energy delivery service to approximately 3.6 million electric and natural gas
customers through these six regulated utilities in Connecticut, Massachusetts and New Hampshire.
On April 30, 2015, the Company’s legal name was changed from Northeast Utilities to Eversource Energy. CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and
WMECO are each doing business as Eversource Energy.
Eversource, CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO are reporting companies under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Eversource Energy
is a public utility holding company under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 2005. Arrangements among the regulated electric companies
and other Eversource companies, outside agencies and other utilities covering interconnections, interchange of electric power and sales of utility
property are subject to regulation by the FERC. The Regulated companies are subject to regulation of rates, accounting and other matters by the
FERC and/or applicable state regulatory commissions (the PURA for CL&P and Yankee Gas, the DPU for NSTAR Electric, WMECO and NSTAR
Gas, and the NHPUC for PSNH).
Regulated Companies: CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO furnish franchised retail electric service in Connecticut, Massachusetts and
New Hampshire. Yankee Gas and NSTAR Gas are engaged in the distribution and sale of natural gas to customers within Connecticut and
Massachusetts, respectively. CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO’s results include the operations of their respective distribution and
transmission businesses. PSNH and WMECO’s distribution results include the operations of their respective generation businesses. Eversource also
has a regulated subsidiary, NPT, which was formed to construct, own and operate the Northern Pass line, a HVDC transmission line from Québec to
New Hampshire under development that will interconnect with a new HVDC transmission line being developed by a transmission subsidiary of HQ.
Other: Eversource Service, Eversource’s service company, Rocky River Realty Company, a wholly-owned real estate subsidiary of Eversource,
Renewable Properties, Inc., an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Eversource, and Properties, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of PSNH, provide
support services to Eversource, including its Regulated companies. Eversource Gas Transmission LLC, an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of
Eversource, holds an equity interest in the Access Northeast project.
Basis of Presentation
B.
The consolidated financial statements of Eversource, NSTAR Electric and PSNH include the accounts of each of their respective subsidiaries.
Intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The accompanying consolidated financial statements of Eversource, NSTAR
Electric and PSNH and the financial statements of CL&P and WMECO are herein collectively referred to as the “financial statements.”
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Eversource consolidates CYAPC and YAEC because CL&P’s, NSTAR Electric’s, PSNH’s and WMECO’s combined ownership interest in each of
these entities is greater than 50 percent. Intercompany transactions between CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO and the CYAPC and
YAEC companies have been eliminated in consolidation of the Eversource financial statements.
Eversource’s utility subsidiaries’ distribution (including generation) and transmission businesses are subject to rate-regulation that is based on cost
recovery and meets the criteria for application of accounting guidance for entities with rate-regulated operations, which considers the effect of
regulation on the differences in the timing of the recognition of certain revenues and expenses from those of other businesses and industries. See
Note 2, “Regulatory Accounting,” for further information.
Certain reclassifications of prior year data were made in the accompanying financial statements to conform to the current year presentation and as a
result of the adoption of new accounting guidance. See Note 1C, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Accounting Standards,” for further
information.
In accordance with accounting guidance on noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements, the Preferred Stock of CL&P and the
Preferred Stock of NSTAR Electric, which are not owned by Eversource or its consolidated subsidiaries and are not subject to mandatory
58
redemption, have been presented as noncontrolling interests in the financial statements of Eversource. The Preferred Stock of CL&P and the
Preferred Stock of NSTAR Electric are considered to be temporary equity and have been classified between liabilities and permanent shareholders’
equity on the balance sheets of Eversource, CL&P and NSTAR Electric due to a provision in the preferred stock agreements of both CL&P and
NSTAR Electric that grant preferred stockholders the right to elect a majority of the CL&P and NSTAR Electric Boards of Directors, respectively,
should certain conditions exist, such as if preferred dividends are in arrears for a specified amount of time. The Net Income reported in the
statements of income and cash flows represents net income prior to apportionment to noncontrolling interests, which is represented by dividends on
preferred stock of CL&P and NSTAR Electric.
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, Eversource’s carrying amount of goodwill was approximately $3.5 billion. Eversource performs an assessment
for possible impairment of its goodwill at least annually. Eversource completed its annual goodwill impairment test for each of its reporting units as
of October 1, 2015 and determined that no impairment exists. See Note 21, “Goodwill,” for further information.
Accounting Standards
C.
Accounting Standards Issued but not Yet Effective: In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an Accounting Standards
Update (ASU) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which amends existing revenue recognition guidance and is required to be applied
retrospectively (either to each reporting period presented or cumulatively at the date of initial application). In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU
2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers – Deferral of the Effective Date, which defers the effective date of ASU 2014-09 to the first
quarter of 2018, with 2017 application permitted. The Company is reviewing the requirements of ASU 2014-09 and will implement the standard in
the first quarter of 2018. The ASU is not expected to have a material impact on the financial statements of Eversource, CL&P, NSTAR Electric,
PSNH or WMECO.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments-Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Liabilities,
which is required to be implemented in the first quarter of 2018. The Company is reviewing the requirements of the ASU. The ASU will remove the
available-for-sale designation for equity securities, whereby changes in fair value are recorded in other comprehensive income in shareholders’
equity, and will require changes in fair value of all equity securities to be recorded in earnings beginning on January 1, 2018, with the unrealized gain
or loss on available-for-sale equity securities as of that date reclassified to retained earnings as a cumulative effect of adoption. The fair value of
available-for-sale equity securities subject to this guidance as of December 31, 2015 was approximately $52 million. The remaining available-for-
sale equity securities included in marketable securities on the balance sheet are held in nuclear decommissioning trusts and are subject to regulatory
accounting treatment and will not be impacted by this guidance. Implementation of the ASU for other financial instruments is not expected to have a
material impact on the financial statements of Eversource, CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH or WMECO.
On February 25, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, which changes existing lease accounting guidance and is required to be applied in the
first quarter of 2019, with earlier application permitted. The ASU is required to be implemented for leases beginning on the date of initial
application. For prior periods presented, leases are required to be recognized and measured using a modified retrospective approach. The Company
is reviewing the requirements of ASU 2016-02.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards: In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, that
changed the balance sheet presentation of debt issuance costs. Under the ASU, issuance costs related to debt are presented on the balance sheet as a
direct deduction from the carrying amount of the debt liability rather than as a deferred cost. The new accounting guidance is effective for interim
and annual periods beginning in the first quarter of 2016 with early adoption permitted and is required to be applied retrospectively. On
December 31, 2015, the Company adopted the new accounting guidance and applied it retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial
statements. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the balance sheets and had no impact on the results of operations or cash
flows of Eversource, CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH or WMECO. See Note 8, “Long-Term Debt,” for the prior year amounts that have been
retrospectively adjusted.
On November 20, 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, that required all deferred tax liabilities and
assets, along with any related valuation allowance, be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet. This new accounting guidance is effective for
interim and annual periods beginning in the first quarter of 2017 with early adoption permitted and may be applied either prospectively or
retrospectively. On December 31, 2015, the Company adopted the new accounting guidance and applied it prospectively. The adoption of this ASU
did not have a material effect on the balance sheets and had no impact on the results of operations or cash flows of Eversource, CL&P, NSTAR
Electric, PSNH or WMECO. The current portion of Accumulated Deferred Income Taxes as of December 31, 2014, which was included in Total
Current Liabilities on the balance sheets, was $160.3 million for Eversource, $34.1 million for CL&P, $55.1 million for NSTAR Electric, $36.2
million for PSNH, and $18.1 million for WMECO.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
D.
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and short-term cash investments that are highly liquid in nature and have original maturities of three
months or less. At the end of each reporting period, any overdraft amounts are reclassified from Cash and Cash Equivalents to Accounts Payable on
the balance sheets.
Provision for Uncollectible Accounts
E.
Eversource, including CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO, presents its receivables at estimated net realizable value by maintaining a
provision for uncollectible accounts. This provision is determined based upon a variety of judgments and factors, including the application of an
estimated uncollectible percentage to each receivable aging category. The estimate is based upon historical collection and write-off experience and
management’s assessment of collectability from customers. Management continuously assesses the collectability of receivables and adjusts
collectability estimates based on actual experience. Receivable balances are written off against the provision for uncollectible accounts when the
customer accounts are terminated and these balances are deemed to be uncollectible.
59
The PURA allows CL&P and Yankee Gas to accelerate the recovery of accounts receivable balances attributable to qualified customers under
financial or medical duress (uncollectible hardship accounts receivable) outstanding for greater than 180 days and 90 days, respectively. The DPU
allows WMECO and NSTAR Gas to also recover in rates amounts associated with certain uncollectible hardship accounts receivable. Certain of
NSTAR Electric’s uncollectible hardship accounts receivable are expected to be recovered in future rates, similar to WMECO and NSTAR Gas.
Uncollectible customer account balances, which are expected to be recovered in rates, are included in Regulatory Assets or Other Long-Term Assets
on the balance sheets.
The total provision for uncollectible accounts and for uncollectible hardship accounts, which is included in the total provision, are included in
Receivables, Net on the balance sheets, and were as follows:
(Millions of Dollars)
Eversource
CL&P
NSTAR Electric
PSNH
WMECO
Total Provision for Uncollectible Accounts
As of December 31,
Uncollectible Hardship
As of December 31,
2015
2014
2015
2014
$
190.7 $
79.5
52.6
8.7
14.0
175.3 $
84.3
40.7
7.7
9.9
118.5 $
68.1
25.3
-
7.4
91.5
74.0
-
-
6.2
Fuel, Materials and Supplies and Allowance Inventory
F.
Fuel, Materials and Supplies include natural gas, coal, biomass and oil inventories as well as materials purchased primarily for construction or
operation and maintenance purposes. Natural gas, coal, biomass and oil inventories are valued at their respective weighted average cost. Materials
and supplies are valued at the lower of average cost or market.
Fuel, Materials and Supplies also include Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs), which are purchased from suppliers of renewable sources of
generation. RECs are used to meet state mandated Renewable Portfolio Standards requirements.
PSNH is subject to federal and state laws and regulations that regulate emissions of air pollutants, including SO2, CO2, and NOx related to its
regulated generation units, and uses SO2, CO2, and NOx emissions allowances. At the end of each compliance period, PSNH is required to relinquish
SO2, CO2, and NOx emissions allowances corresponding to the actual respective emissions emitted by its generating units over the compliance
period. SO2 and NOx emissions allowances are obtained through an annual allocation from the federal and state regulators that are granted at no cost
and through purchases from third parties. CO2 emissions allowances are obtained through an annual allocation from the state regulator that are
granted at no cost and are acquired through auctions and through purchases from third parties. SO2, CO2, and NOx emissions allowances are charged
to expense based on their weighted average cost as they are utilized against emissions volumes at PSNH’s generating units. SO2, CO2, and NOx
emissions allowances are recorded within Fuel, Materials and Supplies on the balance sheet and are classified as short-term or long-term depending
on the period in which they are expected to be utilized against actual emissions. Current SO2 and CO2 emissions allowances were classified as Fuel,
Materials and Supplies on the balance sheets and long-term SO2 and CO2 emissions allowances were classified as Other Long-Term Assets on the
balance sheets.
The carrying amount of fuel, materials and supplies, RECs, and emission allowances were as follows:
(Millions of Dollars)
Current:
Fuel
Materials and Supplies
RECs
Emission Allowances
Long-Term:
Emission Allowances
2015
NSTAR
Electric
Eversource
As of December 31,
2014
PSNH
Eversource
NSTAR
Electric
PSNH
$
152.5 $
131.2
50.9
1.9
- $
32.2
43.3
-
$
103.4
44.6
7.0
1.9
164.3 $
159.5
25.8
0.1
- $
49.1
25.1
-
95.1
52.2
0.7
0.1
17.5
-
17.5
20.1
-
20.1
Deposits
G.
As of December 31, 2015, Eversource, CL&P, NSTAR Electric and PSNH had $17.1 million, $0.7 million, $8.5 million and $1.5 million,
respectively, of cash collateral posted not subject to master netting agreements, with ISO-NE related to energy purchase transactions, which was
included in Prepayments and Other Current Assets on the balance sheets. As of December 31, 2014, these amounts were $9.9 million, $1.2 million
and $2.5 million for Eversource, CL&P and PSNH, respectively.
Fair Value Measurements
H.
Fair value measurement guidance is applied to derivative contracts that are not elected or designated as “normal purchases or normal sales” (normal)
and to the marketable securities held in trusts. Fair value measurement guidance is also applied to valuations of the investments used to calculate the
funded status of pension and PBOP plans, the nonrecurring fair value measurements of nonfinancial assets such as goodwill and AROs, and the
estimated fair value of preferred stock and long-term debt.
Fair Value Hierarchy: In measuring fair value, Eversource uses observable market data when available in order to minimize the use of unobservable
inputs. Inputs used in fair value measurements are categorized into three fair value hierarchy levels for disclosure purposes. The entire fair value
measurement is categorized based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Eversource evaluates the
60
classification of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a quarterly basis, and Eversource’s policy is to recognize transfers between levels of
the fair value hierarchy as of the end of the reporting period. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
Level 1 - Inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. Active markets
are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an
ongoing basis.
Level 2 - Inputs are quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets
that are not active, and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable.
Level 3 - Quoted market prices are not available. Fair value is derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs
or assumptions are unobservable. Where possible, valuation techniques incorporate observable market inputs that can be validated to
external sources such as industry exchanges, including prices of energy and energy-related products.
Determination of Fair Value: The valuation techniques and inputs used in Eversource’s fair value measurements are described in Note 4,
“Derivative Instruments,” Note 5, “Marketable Securities,” Note 6, “Asset Retirement Obligations,” Note 9A, “Employee Benefits – Pension
Benefits and Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions,” and Note 13, “Fair Value of Financial Instruments” to the financial statements.
Derivative Accounting
I.
Many of the Regulated companies’ contracts for the purchase and sale of energy or energy-related products are derivatives. The accounting
treatment for energy contracts entered into varies and depends on the intended use of the particular contract and on whether or not the contract is a
derivative. For the Regulated companies, regulatory assets or regulatory liabilities are recorded to offset the fair values of derivative contracts, as
contract settlements are recovered from, or refunded to, customers in future rates.
The application of derivative accounting is complex and requires management judgment in the following respects: identification of derivatives and
embedded derivatives, election and designation of a contract as normal, and determination of the fair value of derivative contracts. All of these
judgments can have a significant impact on the financial statements.
The judgment applied in the election of a contract as normal (and resulting accrual accounting) includes the conclusion that it is probable at the
inception of the contract and throughout its term that it will result in physical delivery of the underlying product and that the quantities will be used or
sold by the business in the normal course of business. If facts and circumstances change and management can no longer support this conclusion, then
a contract cannot be considered normal and accrual accounting is terminated, and fair value accounting is applied prospectively.
The fair value of derivative contracts is based upon the contract terms and conditions and the underlying market price or fair value per unit. When
quantities are not specified in the contract, the Company determines whether the contract has a determinable quantity by using amounts referenced in
default provisions and other relevant sections of the contract. The fair value of derivative assets and liabilities with the same counterparty are offset
and recorded as a net derivative asset or liability on the balance sheets.
All changes in the fair value of derivative contracts are recorded as regulatory assets or liabilities and do not impact net income.
For further information regarding derivative contracts, see Note 4, “Derivative Instruments,” to the financial statements.
Equity Method Investments
J.
Equity investments are included in Other Long-Term Assets on the balance sheets and net earnings related to these equity investments are included in
Other Income, Net on the statements of income.
Regional Decommissioned Nuclear Companies: CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO own common stock in three regional nuclear
generation companies (CYAPC, YAEC and MYAPC, collectively referred to as the Yankee Companies), each of which owned a single nuclear
generating facility that has been decommissioned. For CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO, the respective investments in CYAPC, YAEC
and MYAPC are accounted for under the equity method. Eversource consolidates CYAPC and YAEC because CL&P’s, NSTAR Electric’s, PSNH’s
and WMECO’s combined ownership interest in each of these entities is greater than 50 percent. Intercompany transactions between CL&P, NSTAR
Electric, PSNH and WMECO and the CYAPC and YAEC companies have been eliminated in consolidation of the Eversource financial statements.
CL&P’s, NSTAR Electric’s, PSNH’s and WMECO’s ownership interests in the Yankee Companies and the total carrying values, which were
included in Other Long-Term Assets on their respective balance sheets, were as follows:
Ownership Interests (percent)
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014
YAEC
CYAPC
CL&P
NSTAR Electric
PSNH
WMECO
34.5 %
14.0
5.0
9.5
24.5 %
14.0
7.0
7.0
MYAPC
12.0 %
4.0
5.0
3.0
$
Carrying Amount (in millions)
As of December 31,
2015
2014
1.2 $
0.5
0.3
0.3
1.2
0.5
0.3
0.3
For further information on the Yankee Companies, see Note 11C, “Commitments and Contingencies - Contractual Obligations - Yankee
Companies,” to the financial statements.
61
Infrastructure and Other Investments: As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, Eversource had an equity ownership interest in an energy investment
fund of $30.3 million and $17.8 million, respectively. Eversource had a 40 percent equity ownership interest in the Algonquin Gas Transmission,
LLC (legal entity that owns Access Northeast assets) of $10.7 million as of December 31, 2015.
Revenues
K.
Regulated Companies’ Retail Revenues: The Regulated companies’ retail revenues are based on rates approved by their respective state regulatory
commissions. In general, rates can only be changed through formal proceedings with the state regulatory commissions. The Regulated companies’
rates are designed to recover the costs to provide service to their customers, and include a return on investment. The Regulated companies also
utilize regulatory commission-approved tracking mechanisms to recover certain costs on a fully-reconciling basis. These tracking mechanisms
require rates to be changed periodically to ensure recovery of actual costs incurred.
CL&P (effective December 1, 2014), WMECO, and NSTAR Gas (effective January 1, 2016), each have a regulatory commission approved revenue
decoupling mechanism. Distribution revenues are decoupled from customer sales volumes, which breaks the relationship between sales volumes and
revenues recognized. CL&P and WMECO reconcile their annual base distribution rate recovery to pre-established levels of baseline distribution
delivery service revenues. Any difference between the allowed level of distribution revenue and the actual amount incurred during a 12-month
period is adjusted through rates in the following period.
A significant portion of the Regulated companies’ retail revenues relate to the recovery of costs incurred for the sale of electricity and natural gas
purchased on behalf of customers. These energy supply costs are recovered from customers in rates through cost tracking mechanisms. Energy
purchases are recorded in Purchased Power, Fuel and Transmission, and the sales of energy associated with these purchases are recorded in
Operating Revenues.
Regulated Companies’ Unbilled Revenues: Because customers are billed throughout the month based on pre-determined cycles rather than on a
calendar month basis, an estimate of electricity or natural gas delivered to customers for which the customers have not yet been billed is calculated as
of the balance sheet date. Unbilled revenues are included in Operating Revenues on the statements of income and in Current Assets on the balance
sheets. Actual amounts billed to customers when meter readings become available may vary from the estimated amount.
The Regulated companies estimate unbilled sales monthly using the daily load cycle method. The daily load cycle method allocates billed sales to
the current calendar month based on the daily load for each billing cycle. The billed sales are subtracted from total month load, net of delivery
losses, to estimate unbilled sales. Unbilled revenues are estimated by first allocating unbilled sales to the respective customer classes, then applying
an estimated rate by customer class to those sales. The estimate of unbilled revenues can significantly impact the amount of revenues recorded at
NSTAR Electric and PSNH because they do not have a revenue decoupling mechanism. CL&P and WMECO record a regulatory deferral to reflect
the actual allowed amount of revenue for decoupling.
Regulated Companies’ Transmission Revenues - Wholesale Rates: Wholesale transmission revenues are recovered through FERC approved formula
rates. Wholesale transmission revenues for CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH, and WMECO are collected through a combination of regional and local
rates, both of which are under the ISO New England Transmission, Markets and Services Tariff (ISO-NE Tariff). The ISO-NE Tariff includes
Regional Network Service (RNS), Schedule 21 – ES rate schedules, which recover the costs of transmission and other transmission-related services
for CL&P, PSNH and WMECO, and Schedule 21 - NSTAR rate schedules, which recover costs of transmission and other transmission-related
services for NSTAR Electric. The RNS rate, administered by ISO-NE and billed to all New England transmission load, including CL&P, NSTAR
Electric, PSNH and WMECO’s distribution businesses, is reset on June 1st of each year and recovers the revenue requirements associated with Pool
Transmission Facilities (PTF) that benefit the entire New England region. The Schedule 21 – ES rate and Schedule 21 - NSTAR rate are
administered by Eversource and recover any PTF costs not recovered under RNS rates, as well as the cost of transmission facilities associated with
the respective utility’s local system. The Schedule 21 - ES rate is reset on January 1st and June 1st of each year, while the Schedule 21 - NSTAR rate
is reset on June 1st of each year. The Schedule 21 – ES rate and Schedule 21 - NSTAR rate calculations recover total transmission revenue
requirements net of revenues received from other sources (i.e., RNS, rentals, etc.), thereby ensuring that Eversource recovers all of CL&P’s, NSTAR
Electric’s, PSNH’s and WMECO’s regional and local transmission revenue requirements in accordance with the ISO-NE Tariff. The RNS, Schedule
21 – ES rate and Schedule 21 - NSTAR rate provide for the annual reconciliation and recovery or refund of estimated costs to actual costs. The
financial impacts of differences between actual and estimated costs are deferred for future recovery from, or refunded to, transmission customers.
See Note 11E, “Commitments and Contingencies – FERC ROE Complaints,” for complaints filed at the FERC relating to Eversource’s ROE.
Regulated Companies’ Transmission Revenues - Retail Rates: A significant portion of the Eversource transmission segment revenue comes from
ISO-NE charges to the distribution businesses of CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO, each of which recovers these costs through rates
charged to their retail customers. CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO each have a retail transmission cost tracking mechanism as part of
their rates, which allows the electric distribution companies to charge their retail customers for transmission costs on a timely basis.
L.
Costs related to fuel and natural gas included in Purchased Power, Fuel and Transmission on the statements of income were as follows:
Operating Expenses
(Millions of Dollars)
Eversource - Natural Gas and Fuel
PSNH - Fuel
2015
For the Years Ended December 31,
2014
2013
$
516.7 $
85.4
599.4 $
113.4
466.5
104.8
62
Allowance for Funds Used During Construction
M.
AFUDC represents the cost of borrowed and equity funds used to finance construction and is included in the cost of the Regulated companies’ utility
plant on the balance sheet. The portion of AFUDC attributable to borrowed funds is recorded as a reduction of Other Interest Expense, and the
AFUDC related to equity funds is recorded as Other Income, Net on the statements of income. AFUDC costs are recovered from customers over the
service life of the related plant in the form of increased revenue collected as a result of higher depreciation expense.
The Regulated companies’ average AFUDC rate is based on a FERC-prescribed formula using the cost of a company’s short-term financings and
capitalization (preferred stock, long-term debt and common equity), as appropriate. The average rate is applied to average eligible CWIP amounts to
calculate AFUDC.
AFUDC costs and the weighted-average AFUDC rates were as follows:
Eversource
(Millions of Dollars, except percentages)
Borrowed Funds
Equity Funds
Total AFUDC
Average AFUDC Rate
$
$
2015
For the Years Ended December 31,
2014
2013
7.2
18.8
26.0
3.9%
$
$
5.8
13.7
19.5
3.4%
$
$
4.1
7.1
11.2
2.7%
(Millions of Dollars,
except percentages)
Borrowed Funds
Equity Funds
Total AFUDC
Average AFUDC Rate
2015
CL&P
NSTAR
Electric
PSNH
$
$
2.6 $
5.2
7.8 $
5.5%
2.0 $
4.3
6.3 $
3.2%
For the Years Ended December 31,
2014
NSTAR
Electric
PSNH
2013
NSTAR
Electric
PSNH
WMECO CL&P
1.0 $
1.7
2.7 $
4.4%
1.9 $
2.9
4.8 $
3.4%
1.0 $
1.2
2.2 $
1.8%
2.0 $
3.8
5.8 $
2.5%
WMECO CL&P
0.9 $
1.7
2.6 $
5.6%
0.6 $
0.6
1.2 $
1.8%
2.2 $
2.9
5.1 $
3.7%
0.5 $
-
0.5 $
0.5%
WMECO
0.5
1.0
1.5
6.1%
0.5 $
0.2
0.7 $
1.1%
Other Income, Net
N.
Items included within Other Income, Net on the statements of income primarily consist of investment income/(loss), interest income, AFUDC related
to equity funds, and equity in earnings of equity method investees. Investment income/(loss) primarily relates to debt and equity securities held in
trust. For further information, see Note 5, “Marketable Securities,” to the financial statements. For further information on AFUDC related to equity
funds, see Note 1M, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Allowance for Funds Used During Construction,” to the financial statements.
Other Taxes
O.
Gross receipts taxes levied by the state of Connecticut are collected by CL&P and Yankee Gas from their respective customers. These gross receipts
taxes are shown separately with collections in Operating Revenues and with payments in Taxes Other Than Income Taxes on the statements of
income as follows:
(Millions of Dollars)
Eversource
CL&P
$
2015
For the Years Ended December 31,
2014
2013
147.2 $
128.5
148.2 $
127.9
144.1
128.2
As agents for state and local governments, Eversource’s companies that serve customers in Connecticut and Massachusetts collect certain sales taxes
that are recorded on a net basis with no impact on the statements of income.
P.
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Eversource
(Millions of Dollars)
Cash Paid During the Year for:
Interest, Net of Amounts Capitalized
Income Taxes
Non-Cash Investing Activities:
Plant Additions Included in Accounts Payable (As of)
As of and For the Years Ended December 31,
2014
2013
2015
$
365.9 $
10.3
349.6 $
334.2
216.6
181.9
343.3
50.0
193.1
(Millions of Dollars)
Cash Paid/(Received) During the Year for:
Interest, Net of Amounts Capitalized
Income Taxes
Non-Cash Investing Activities:
Plant Additions Included in
Accounts Payable (As of)
2015
NSTAR
CL&P Electric PSNH
As of and For the Years Ended December 31,
2014
NSTAR
2013
NSTAR
WMECO CL&P Electric PSNH
WMECO CL&P Electric PSNH
WMECO
$ 144.4 $
55.2
75.7 $
(19.8)
42.3 $
14.4
26.7 $ 144.1 $
75.3 $
14.7 135.4 217.1
41.1 $
2.3
25.9 $ 131.6 $
25.1
75.8 $
55.0 163.4
43.3 $
(30.1)
25.8
(69.0)
76.0
23.5
46.5
27.0
63.5
34.6
39.3
14.2
51.4
57.0
34.9
19.5
63
The 2015 cash paid for interest excludes interest payments made by CL&P and WMECO in connection with the full satisfaction of their respective
obligations to the DOE for the disposal of spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste. For further information, see Note 8, “Long-Term
Debt,” to the financial statements.
In 2014, as a result of damages awarded to the Yankee Companies for spent nuclear fuel lawsuits against the DOE described in Note 11C,
“Commitments and Contingencies - Contractual Obligations - Yankee Companies,” Eversource received total proceeds of $132.1 million, which
were net of $80.6 million in proceeds CYAPC and YAEC returned to non-affiliated member companies.
Related Parties
Q.
Eversource Service, Eversource’s service company, provides centralized accounting, administrative, engineering, financial, information technology,
legal, operational, planning, purchasing, and other services to Eversource’s companies. The Rocky River Realty Company, Renewable Properties,
Inc. and Properties, Inc., three other Eversource subsidiaries, construct, acquire or lease some of the property and facilities used by Eversource’s
companies.
As of both December 31, 2015 and 2014, CL&P, PSNH and WMECO had long-term receivables from Eversource Service in the amounts of $25
million, $3.8 million and $5.5 million, respectively, which were included in Other Long-Term Assets on the balance sheets. These amounts related
to the funding of investments held in trust by Eversource Service in connection with certain postretirement benefits for CL&P, PSNH and WMECO
employees and have been eliminated in consolidation on the Eversource financial statements.
Included in the CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO balance sheets as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 were Accounts Receivable from
Affiliated Companies and Accounts Payable to Affiliated Companies relating to transactions between CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO
and other subsidiaries that are wholly-owned by Eversource. These amounts have been eliminated in consolidation on the Eversource financial
statements.
Severance Benefits
R.
For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, Eversource recorded severance benefit expense of $4.7 million, $15 million and $9.7
million, respectively, in connection with organizational and cost saving initiatives, and, in 2014, the partial outsourcing of information technology
functions. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the severance accrual totaled $9.3 million and $10.4 million, respectively, and was included in Other
Current Liabilities on the balance sheets.
2.
REGULATORY ACCOUNTING
Eversource’s Regulated companies are subject to rate-regulation that is based on cost recovery and meets the criteria for application of accounting
guidance for rate-regulated operations, which considers the effect of regulation on the timing of the recognition of certain revenues and expenses.
The Regulated companies’ financial statements reflect the effects of the rate-making process. The rates charged to the customers of Eversource’s
Regulated companies are designed to collect each company’s costs to provide service, including a return on investment.
Management believes it is probable that each of the Regulated companies will recover their respective investments in long-lived assets, including
regulatory assets. If management were to determine that it could no longer apply the accounting guidance applicable to rate-regulated enterprises to
any of the Regulated companies’ operations, or if management could not conclude it is probable that costs would be recovered from customers in
future rates, the costs would be charged to net income in the period in which the determination is made.
Regulatory Assets: The components of regulatory assets were as follows:
Eversource
(Millions of Dollars)
Benefit Costs
Derivative Liabilities
Income Taxes, Net
Storm Restoration Costs
Goodwill-related
Regulatory Tracker Mechanisms
Contractual Obligations - Yankee Companies
Other Regulatory Assets
Total Regulatory Assets
Less: Current Portion
Total Long-Term Regulatory Assets
As of December 31,
2015
2014
1,828.2 $
388.0
650.9
436.9
484.9
526.5
134.4
134.0
4,583.8
845.8
3,738.0 $
2,016.0
425.5
635.3
502.8
505.4
350.5
123.8
167.3
4,726.6
672.5
4,054.1
$
$
64
(Millions of Dollars)
Benefit Costs
Derivative Liabilities
Income Taxes, Net
Storm Restoration Costs
Goodwill-related
Regulatory Tracker Mechanisms
Other Regulatory Assets
Total Regulatory Assets
Less: Current Portion
Total Long-Term Regulatory Assets
As of December 31,
2015
CL&P
NSTAR
Electric
413.6 $
380.8
444.4
271.4
-
45.1
82.0
1,637.3
268.3
1,369.0 $
479.9 $
1.3
85.7
110.9
416.3
311.0
56.3
1,461.4
348.4
1,113.0 $
$
$
PSNH
WMECO
CL&P
2014
NSTAR
Electric
PSNH
WMECO
164.2 $
-
34.5
31.5
-
101.2
31.5
362.9
105.0
257.9 $
84.9 $
-
31.8
23.1
-
40.1
11.3
191.2
56.2
135.0 $
445.4 $
410.9
437.7
319.6
-
16.1
66.1
1,695.8
220.3
1,475.5 $
515.9 $
4.5
83.7
103.7
433.9
141.4
94.7
1,377.8
198.7
1,179.1 $
174.3 $
-
38.0
47.7
-
103.5
41.3
404.8
111.7
293.1 $
85.0
-
35.5
31.8
-
33.0
12.9
198.2
51.9
146.3
Benefit Costs: Eversource’s Pension, SERP and PBOP Plans are accounted for in accordance with accounting guidance on defined benefit pension
and other PBOP plans. The liability recorded by the Regulated companies to recognize the funded status of their retiree benefit plans is offset by a
regulatory asset in lieu of a charge to Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss), reflecting ultimate recovery from customers through rates.
The regulatory asset is amortized as the actuarial gains and losses and prior service cost are amortized to net periodic benefit cost for the pension and
PBOP plans. All amounts are remeasured annually. Regulatory accounting is also applied to the portions of Eversource’s service company costs that
support the Regulated companies, as these amounts are also recoverable. As these regulatory assets do not represent a cash outlay for the Regulated
companies, no carrying charge is recovered from customers.
CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO recover benefit costs related to their distribution and transmission operations from customers in rates
as allowed by their applicable regulatory commissions. NSTAR Electric and WMECO each recover their qualified pension and PBOP expenses
related to distribution operations through rate reconciling mechanisms that fully track the change in net pension and PBOP expenses each year.
Derivative Liabilities: Regulatory assets are recorded as an offset to derivative liabilities and relate to the fair value of contracts used to purchase
energy and energy-related products that will be recovered from customers in future rates. These assets are excluded from rate base and are being
recovered as the actual settlements occur over the duration of the contracts. See Note 4, “Derivative Instruments,” to the financial statements for
further information on these contracts.
Income Taxes, Net: The tax effect of temporary book-tax differences (differences between the periods in which transactions affect income in the
financial statements and the periods in which they affect the determination of taxable income, including those differences relating to uncertain tax
positions) is accounted for in accordance with the rate-making treatment of the applicable regulatory commissions and accounting guidance for
income taxes. Differences in income taxes between the accounting guidance and the rate-making treatment of the applicable regulatory commissions
are recorded as regulatory assets. As these assets are offset by deferred income tax liabilities, no carrying charge is collected. The amortization
period of these assets varies depending on the nature and/or remaining life of the underlying assets and liabilities. For further information regarding
income taxes, see Note 10, “Income Taxes,” to the financial statements.
Storm Restoration Costs: The storm restoration cost deferrals relate to costs incurred for major storm events at CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and
WMECO that each company expects to recover from customers. A storm must meet certain criteria to qualify as a major storm with the criteria
specific to each state jurisdiction and utility company. Once a storm qualifies as a major storm, all qualifying expenses incurred during storm
restoration efforts are deferred and recovered from customers. In addition to storm restoration costs, CL&P and PSNH are each allowed to recover
pre-staging storm costs. Of the total deferred storm restoration costs, $197 million is pending regulatory approval (including $106 million at NSTAR
Electric, $61 million at PSNH, and $30 million at WMECO). Management believes the storm restoration costs were prudent and meet the criteria for
specific cost recovery in Connecticut, Massachusetts and New Hampshire, and that recovery from customers is probable through the applicable
regulatory recovery process. Each electric utility has sought, or is seeking, recovery of its deferred storm restoration costs through its applicable
regulatory recovery process. Each electric utility company earns a return on its deferred storm restoration cost regulatory asset balance.
Goodwill-related: The goodwill regulatory asset originated from a 1999 merger transaction and the DPU allowed its recovery in NSTAR Electric
and NSTAR Gas rates. This regulatory asset is currently being amortized and recovered from customers in rates without a carrying charge over a 40-
year period, and, as of December 31, 2015, there were 24 years of amortization remaining.
Regulatory Tracker Mechanisms: The Regulated companies’ approved rates are designed to recover their costs incurred to provide service to
customers. The Regulated companies recover certain of their costs on a fully-reconciling basis through regulatory commission-approved tracking
mechanisms. The differences between the costs incurred (or the rate recovery allowed) and the actual revenues are recorded as regulatory assets (for
undercollections) or as regulatory liabilities (for overcollections) to be included in future customer rates each year. Carrying charges are recorded on
all material regulatory tracker mechanisms.
CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO each recover, on a fully reconciling basis, the costs associated with the procurement of energy,
transmission related costs from FERC-approved transmission tariffs, energy efficiency programs (including LBR at NSTAR Electric), low income
assistance programs, certain uncollectible accounts receivable for hardship customers, and restructuring and stranded costs as a result of deregulation.
Energy procurement costs at PSNH include the costs related to its generating stations and at WMECO include the costs related to its solar generation.
65
CL&P (effective December 1, 2014) and WMECO each have a regulatory commission approved revenue decoupling mechanism. Distribution
revenues are decoupled from customer sales volumes, which breaks the relationship between sales volumes and revenues recognized. CL&P and
WMECO reconcile their annual base distribution rate recovery to pre-established levels of baseline distribution delivery service revenues. Any
difference between the allowed level of distribution revenue and the actual amount received during a 12-month period is adjusted through rates in the
following period. CL&P and WMECO’s revenue decoupling mechanisms permit recovery of an annual base amount of distribution revenues of
$1.059 billion and $132.4 million, respectively.
Contractual Obligations - Yankee Companies: CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO are responsible for their proportionate share of the
remaining costs of the CYAPC, YAEC and MYAPC nuclear facilities, including nuclear fuel storage. A portion of these costs was recorded as a
regulatory asset. Amounts for CL&P are earning a return and are being recovered through the CTA. Amounts for NSTAR Electric and WMECO are
being recovered without a return through the transition charge. Amounts for PSNH were fully recovered in 2006. As a result of Eversource’s
consolidation of CYAPC and YAEC, Eversource’s regulatory asset balance also includes the regulatory assets of CYAPC and YAEC, which totaled
$110.9 million and $97.8 million as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Intercompany transactions between CL&P, NSTAR Electric,
PSNH and WMECO and the CYAPC and YAEC companies have been eliminated in consolidation of the Eversource financial statements.
Other Regulatory Assets: Other Regulatory Assets primarily include asset retirement obligations, environmental remediation costs, losses associated
with the reacquisition or redemption of long-term debt, purchase power contract termination costs and various other items.
Regulatory Costs in Other Long-Term Assets: The Regulated companies had $75.3 million (including $3.1 million for CL&P, $35.4 million for
NSTAR Electric, $4.8 million for PSNH and $16.7 million for WMECO) and $60.5 million (including $1.3 million for CL&P, $33.2 million for
NSTAR Electric, $0.9 million for PSNH, and $11 million for WMECO) of additional regulatory costs as of December 31, 2015 and 2014,
respectively, that were included in Other Long-Term Assets on the balance sheets. These amounts represent incurred costs for which recovery has
not yet been specifically approved by the applicable regulatory agency. However, based on regulatory policies or past precedent on similar costs,
management believes it is probable that these costs will ultimately be approved and recovered from customers in rates. The NSTAR Electric balance
as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 primarily related to the deferral of certain bad debt costs expected to be recovered in future rates.
Equity Return on Regulatory Assets: For rate-making purposes, the Regulated companies recover the carrying costs related to their regulatory assets.
For certain regulatory assets, the carrying cost recovered includes an equity return component. This equity return, which is not recorded on the
balance sheets, totaled $1.5 million and $1.7 million for CL&P as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. These carrying costs will be
recovered from customers in future rates.
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, this equity return, which is not recorded on the balance sheets, totaled $48.3 million and $43.3 million,
respectively, for PSNH. These amounts include $25 million of equity return on the Clean Air Project costs that PSNH has agreed not to bill
customers pending NHPUC approval of a generation divestiture settlement agreement. For further information on the divestiture, see Note 11H,
“Commitments and Contingencies – PSNH Generation Restructuring.”
Regulatory Liabilities: The components of regulatory liabilities were as follows:
Eversource
(Millions of Dollars)
Cost of Removal
Regulatory Tracker Mechanisms
AFUDC - Transmission
Other Regulatory Liabilities
Total Regulatory Liabilities
Less: Current Portion
Total Long-Term Regulatory Liabilities
$
$
As of December 31,
2015
2014
437.1
99.7
66.1
18.5
621.4
107.8
513.6
$
$
As of December 31,
439.9
192.3
67.1
50.8
750.1
235.0
515.1
(Millions of Dollars)
Cost of Removal
Regulatory Tracker Mechanisms
AFUDC - Transmission
Other Regulatory Liabilities
Total Regulatory Liabilities
Less: Current Portion
Total Long-Term Regulatory Liabilities
$
$
2015
CL&P
NSTAR
Electric
24.1 $
56.2
51.5
4.2
136.0
61.2
74.8 $
257.4 $
3.3
5.7
1.3
267.7
3.3
264.4 $
PSNH
WMECO
CL&P
47.2 $
3.4
-
4.2
54.8
6.9
47.9 $
2.8 $
12.9
8.9
0.1
24.7
13.1
11.6 $
19.7 $
122.6
53.6
10.1
206.0
124.7
81.3 $
2014
NSTAR
Electric
258.3 $
20.7
4.4
28.9
312.3
49.6
262.7 $
PSNH
WMECO
50.3 $
14.2
-
2.9
67.4
16.0
51.4 $
1.1
22.3
9.1
0.8
33.3
22.5
10.8
Cost of Removal: Eversource’s Regulated companies currently recover amounts in rates for future costs of removal of plant assets over the lives of
the assets. The estimated cost to remove utility assets from service is recognized as a component of depreciation expense and the cumulative amount
collected from customers but not yet expended is recognized as a regulatory liability. Expended costs that exceed amounts collected from customers
are recognized as regulatory assets, as they are probable of recovery in future rates.
AFUDC - Transmission: Regulatory liabilities were recorded by CL&P and WMECO for AFUDC accrued on certain reliability-related transmission
projects to reflect local rate base recovery as a result of a FERC-approved transmission tariff. A regulatory liability was recorded by NSTAR Electric
for AFUDC accrued on certain reliability-related transmission projects through December 31, 2015 to reflect local rate base recovery. These
regulatory liabilities for CL&P, NSTAR Electric and WMECO will be amortized over the depreciable life of the related transmission assets.
66
2015 Regulatory Developments:
FERC ROE Complaints: As a result of the actions taken by the FERC and other developments in the pending ROE complaint proceedings described
in Note 11E, “Commitments and Contingencies – FERC ROE Complaints,” Eversource recorded reserves for the first and second ROE complaints,
which were recorded as a regulatory liability and as a reduction to operating revenues. The cumulative pre-tax reserves (excluding interest) as of
December 31, 2015, which include the impact of refunds given to customers, totaled $39.1 million for Eversource (including $21.4 million for
CL&P, $8.5 million for NSTAR Electric, $3.1 million for PSNH, and $6.1 million for WMECO).
NSTAR Electric and NSTAR Gas Comprehensive Settlement Agreement: On March 2, 2015, the DPU approved the comprehensive settlement
agreement between NSTAR Electric, NSTAR Gas and the Massachusetts Attorney General (the “Settlement”) as filed with the DPU on
December 31, 2014. The Settlement resolved the outstanding NSTAR Electric CPSL program filings for 2006 through 2011, the NSTAR Electric
and NSTAR Gas PAM and energy efficiency-related customer billing adjustments reported in 2012, and the recovery of LBR related to NSTAR
Electric’s energy efficiency programs for 2009 through 2011 (11 dockets in total). In 2015, as a result of the DPU order, NSTAR Electric and
NSTAR Gas commenced refunding a combined $44.7 million to customers, which was recorded as a regulatory liability. Refunds to customers will
continue through December 2016. As a result of the Settlement, NSTAR Electric increased its operating revenues and decreased its amortization
expense in 2015, resulting in the recognition of a $21.7 million pre-tax benefit in 2015.
NSTAR Electric Basic Service Bad Debt Adder: On January 7, 2015, the DPU issued an order concluding that NSTAR Electric had removed
energy-related bad debt costs from base distribution rates effective January 1, 2006. As a result of the DPU order, in the first quarter of 2015,
NSTAR Electric increased its regulatory assets and reduced its operations and maintenance expense by an under recovered amount of $24.2 million
for energy-related bad debt costs through 2014, resulting in a pre-tax benefit in 2015. NSTAR Electric filed for recovery of the energy-related bad
debt costs regulatory asset from customers and on November 20, 2015 the DPU approved NSTAR Electric’s proposed rate increase to recover these
costs over a 12-month period, effective January 1, 2016.
CL&P Distribution Rates: On July 2, 2015, PURA issued a final order that approved a settlement agreement filed on May 19, 2015, which allows for
an increase to rate base of approximately $163 million associated with ADIT, including a regulatory asset to recover the incremental revenue
requirement for the period December 1, 2014 through November 30, 2015 over a subsequent 24-month period. The rate base increase provided an
increase to total allowed annual revenue requirements of $18.4 million beginning December 1, 2014. As part of the settlement agreement, the $18.4
million for the period December 1, 2014 through November 30, 2015 was recorded as a regulatory asset with a corresponding increase in Operating
Revenues, and is being collected from customers in rates over a 24-month period beginning December 1, 2015.
NSTAR Gas Distribution Rates: On October 30, 2015, the DPU issued its order in the NSTAR Gas distribution rate case, which approved an
annualized base rate increase of $15.8 million, plus other increases of approximately $11.5 million, mostly relating to recovery of pension and PBOP
expenses and the Hopkinton GSA, effective January 1, 2016. In the order, the DPU also approved an authorized regulatory ROE of 9.8 percent, the
establishment of a revenue decoupling mechanism, the recovery of certain bad debt expenses, and a 52.1 percent equity component of its capital
structure. On November 19, 2015, NSTAR Gas filed a motion for reconsideration of the order with the DPU seeking the correction of mathematical
errors and other plant and cost of service items.
As a result of this order, Eversource recorded regulatory deferrals for costs that have been approved for recovery or are expected to be approved for
recovery in future rate proceedings, which resulted in the recognition of a $17.2 million pre-tax benefit in 2015. Included in this amount is a $10.5
million pre-tax benefit recorded at NSTAR Electric for certain uncollectible hardship accounts receivable that are expected to be recovered in future
rates given the allowed recoveries of uncollectible hardship accounts receivable by WMECO and NSTAR Gas.
3.
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
Utility property, plant and equipment is recorded at original cost. Original cost includes materials, labor, construction overhead and AFUDC for
regulated property. The cost of repairs and maintenance, including planned major maintenance activities, is charged to Operating Expenses as
incurred.
The following tables summarize the investments in utility property, plant and equipment by asset category:
Eversource
(Millions of Dollars)
Distribution - Electric
Distribution - Natural Gas
Transmission - Electric
Generation
Electric and Natural Gas Utility
Other (1)
Property, Plant and Equipment, Gross
Less: Accumulated Depreciation
Electric and Natural Gas Utility
Other
Total Accumulated Depreciation
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
Construction Work in Progress
Total Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
As of December 31,
2015
2014
13,054.8 $
2,727.2
7,691.9
1,194.1
24,668.0
558.6
25,226.6
(6,141.1)
(255.6)
(6,396.7)
18,829.9
1,062.5
19,892.4 $
12,495.2
2,595.4
6,930.7
1,170.9
23,192.2
551.3
23,743.5
(5,777.8)
(231.8)
(6,009.6)
17,733.9
913.1
18,647.0
$
$
(1) These assets are primarily comprised of building improvements, computer software, hardware and equipment at Eversource Service.
67
(Millions of Dollars)
Distribution
Transmission
Generation
Property, Plant and
Equipment, Gross
Less: Accumulated Depreciation
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
Construction Work in Progress
Total Property, Plant and
Equipment, Net
As of December 31,
CL&P
NSTAR
Electric
2015
PSNH
WMECO
CL&P
2014
NSTAR
Electric
PSNH
WMECO
$
5,377.2 $
3,618.0
-
5,100.5 $
2,131.3
-
1,804.8 $
928.2
1,158.1
812.3 $
964.9
36.0
5,158.8 $
3,274.0
-
4,895.5 $
1,928.5
-
1,696.7 $
789.7
1,136.5
784.2
891.0
34.4
8,995.2
(2,041.9)
6,953.3
203.5
7,231.8
(1,886.8)
5,345.0
310.5
3,891.1
(1,171.0)
2,720.1
135.3
1,813.2
(307.0)
1,506.2
69.1
8,432.8
(1,928.0)
6,504.8
304.9
6,824.0
(1,761.4)
5,062.6
272.8
3,622.9
(1,090.0)
2,532.9
102.9
1,709.6
(297.4)
1,412.2
49.1
$
7,156.8 $
5,655.5 $
2,855.4 $
1,575.3 $
6,809.7 $
5,335.4 $
2,635.8 $
1,461.3
As of December 31, 2015, PSNH had $1.2 billion in gross generation utility plant assets and related Accumulated Depreciation of $522.4 million.
These generation assets are the subject of a divestiture agreement entered into on June 10, 2015 between Eversource, PSNH and key New Hampshire
officials whereby, among other resolutions, PSNH has agreed to divest these generation assets upon NHPUC approval. Upon completion of the
divestiture process, remaining costs not recovered by the sale of these assets (stranded costs) will be recovered via bonds that will be secured by a
non-bypassable charge or other recovery mechanisms in rates billed to PSNH’s customers. See Note 11H, “Commitments and Contingencies –
PSNH Generation Restructuring,” for further information.
Depreciation of utility assets is calculated on a straight-line basis using composite rates based on the estimated remaining useful lives of the various
classes of property (estimated useful life for PSNH distribution). The composite rates, which are subject to approval by the appropriate state
regulatory agency, include a cost of removal component (other than PSNH Generation), which is collected from customers over the lives of the plant
assets and is recognized as a regulatory liability. Depreciation rates are applied to property from the time it is placed in service.
Upon retirement from service, the cost of the utility asset is charged to the accumulated provision for depreciation. The actual incurred removal costs
are applied against the related regulatory liability.
The depreciation rates for the various classes of utility property, plant and equipment aggregate to composite rates as follows:
(Percent)
Eversource
CL&P
NSTAR Electric
PSNH
WMECO
2015
2014
2013
2.9 %
2.7 %
3.0 %
3.2 %
2.7 %
3.0 %
2.7 %
3.0 %
3.0 %
3.3 %
2.8 %
2.5 %
2.9 %
3.0 %
2.9 %
The following table summarizes average remaining useful lives of depreciable assets:
(Years)
Distribution
Transmission
Generation
Other
Eversource
CL&P
As of December 31, 2015
NSTAR Electric
PSNH
WMECO
34.8
41.6
30.7
14.1
37.3
38.7
-
-
31.9
43.8
-
-
31.3
41.6
30.9
-
30.5
50.0
25.0
-
4.
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
The Regulated companies purchase and procure energy and energy-related products, which are subject to price volatility, for their customers. The
costs associated with supplying energy to customers are recoverable from customers in future rates. The Regulated companies manage the risks
associated with the price volatility of energy and energy-related products through the use of derivative and nonderivative contracts.
Many of the derivative contracts meet the definition of, and are designated as, normal and qualify for accrual accounting under the applicable
accounting guidance. The costs and benefits of derivative contracts that meet the definition of normal are recognized in Operating Expenses or
Operating Revenues on the statements of income, as applicable, as electricity or natural gas is delivered.
Derivative contracts that are not designated as normal are recorded at fair value as current or long-term Derivative Assets or Derivative Liabilities on
the balance sheets. For the Regulated companies, regulatory assets or regulatory liabilities are recorded to offset the fair values of derivatives, as
contract settlement amounts are recovered from, or refunded to, customers in their respective energy supply rates.
68
The gross fair values of derivative assets and liabilities with the same counterparty are offset and reported as net Derivative Assets or Derivative
Liabilities, with current and long-term portions, on the balance sheets. The following table presents the gross fair values of contracts, categorized by
risk type, and the net amounts recorded as current or long-term derivative assets or liabilities:
(Millions of Dollars)
Current Derivative Assets:
Level 3:
Eversource
CL&P
NSTAR Electric
Long-Term Derivative Assets:
Level 2:
Eversource
Level 3:
Eversource
CL&P
NSTAR Electric
Current Derivative Liabilities:
Level 2:
Eversource
Level 3:
Eversource
CL&P
NSTAR Electric
Commodity Supply
and Price Risk
Management
2015
Netting (1)
As of December 31,
Net Amount
Recorded as
a Derivative
Commodity Supply
and Price Risk
Management
2014
Netting (1)
Net Amount
Recorded as
a Derivative
$
$
16.7 $
16.7
-
(10.9) $
(10.9)
-
$
5.8
5.8
-
16.2 $
16.1
0.1
(6.6) $
(6.6)
-
0.1 $
- $
0.1
$
- $
- $
62.0
60.7
1.3
(19.3)
(19.3)
-
42.7
41.4
1.3
93.5
93.5
-
(19.2)
(19.2)
-
$
(5.8) $
- $
(5.8)
$
(9.8) $
- $
(92.3)
(91.8)
(0.5)
-
-
-
(92.3)
(91.8)
(0.5)
(90.0)
(88.5)
(1.5)
-
-
-
9.6
9.5
0.1
-
74.3
74.3
-
(9.8)
(90.0)
(88.5)
(1.5)
Long-Term Derivative Liabilities:
Level 2:
Eversource
Level 3:
Eversource
CL&P
NSTAR Electric
$
- $
- $
-
$
(0.3) $
- $
(0.3)
(337.1)
(336.2)
(0.9)
-
-
-
(337.1)
(336.2)
(0.9)
(409.3)
(406.2)
(3.1)
-
-
-
(409.3)
(406.2)
(3.1)
(1) Amounts represent derivative assets and liabilities that Eversource elected to record net on the balance sheets. These amounts are subject to
master netting agreements or similar agreements for which the right of offset exists.
The business activities that result in the recognition of derivative assets also create exposure to various counterparties. As of December 31, 2015,
Eversource’s and CL&P’s derivative assets were exposed to counterparty credit risk. Of Eversource’s and CL&P’s derivative assets, approximately
$47 million was contracted with investment grade entities.
For further information on the fair value of derivative contracts, see Note 1H, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Fair Value
Measurements,” and Note 1I, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Derivative Accounting,” to the financial statements.
Derivative Contracts At Fair Value with Offsetting Regulatory Amounts
Commodity Supply and Price Risk Management: As required by regulation, CL&P, along with UI, has capacity-related contracts with generation
facilities. CL&P has a sharing agreement with UI, with 80 percent of the costs or benefits of each contract borne by or allocated to CL&P and 20
percent borne by or allocated to UI. The combined capacity of these contracts is 787 MW. The capacity contracts extend through 2026 and obligate
both CL&P and UI to make or receive payments on a monthly basis to or from the generation facilities based on the difference between a set capacity
price and the capacity market price received in the ISO-NE capacity markets. In addition, CL&P has a contract to purchase 0.1 million MWh of
energy per year through 2020.
NSTAR Electric has a renewable energy contract to purchase 0.1 million MWh of energy per year through 2018 and a capacity-related contract to
purchase up to 35 MW per year through 2019.
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, Eversource had NYMEX financial contracts for natural gas futures in order to reduce variability associated with
the purchase price of approximately 9.1 million and 8.8 million MMBtu of natural gas, respectively.
For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, there were losses of $60.2 million and gains of $134.4 million and $160.6 million,
respectively, deferred as regulatory costs, which reflect the change in fair value associated with Eversource’s derivative contracts.
Credit Risk
Certain of Eversource’s derivative contracts contain credit risk contingent provisions. These provisions require Eversource to maintain investment
grade credit ratings from the major rating agencies and to post collateral for contracts in a net liability position over specified credit limits. As of
December 31, 2015 and 2014, Eversource had $5.8 million and $10 million, respectively, of derivative contracts in a net liability position that were
69
subject to credit risk contingent provisions and would have been required to post additional collateral of $5.8 million and $10 million, respectively, if
Eversource parent’s unsecured debt credit ratings had been downgraded to below investment grade.
Fair Value Measurements of Derivative Instruments
Derivative contracts classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy relate to the financial contracts for natural gas futures. Prices are obtained from
broker quotes and are based on actual market activity. The contracts are valued using NYMEX natural gas prices. Valuations of these contracts also
incorporate discount rates using the yield curve approach.
The fair value of derivative contracts classified as Level 3 utilizes significant unobservable inputs. The fair value is modeled using income
techniques, such as discounted cash flow valuations adjusted for assumptions relating to exit price. Significant observable inputs for valuations of
these contracts include energy and energy-related product prices in future years for which quoted prices in an active market exist. Fair value
measurements categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy are prepared by individuals with expertise in valuation techniques, pricing of energy
and energy-related products, and accounting requirements. The future power and capacity prices for periods that are not quoted in an active market
or established at auction are based on available market data and are escalated based on estimates of inflation in order to address the full time period of
the contract.
Valuations of derivative contracts using a discounted cash flow methodology include assumptions regarding the timing and likelihood of scheduled
payments and also reflect non-performance risk, including credit, using the default probability approach based on the counterparty’s credit rating for
assets and the Company’s credit rating for liabilities. Valuations incorporate estimates of premiums or discounts that would be required by a market
participant to arrive at an exit price, using historical market transactions adjusted for the terms of the contract.
The following is a summary of Eversource’s, including CL&P’s and NSTAR Electric’s, Level 3 derivative contracts and the range of the significant
unobservable inputs utilized in their respective valuations over the duration of the contracts:
Capacity Prices:
Eversource
CL&P
NSTAR Electric
Forward Reserve:
Eversource, CL&P
REC Prices:
Eversource, NSTAR Electric
2015
2014
As of December 31,
Range
Period Covered
Range
Period Covered
$ 10.81 - 15.82 per kW-Month
$ 10.81 - 12.60 per kW-Month
$ 10.81 - 15.82 per kW-Month
2016 - 2026
2019 - 2026
2016 - 2019
5.30 - 12.98 per kW-Month
$
$ 11.08 - 12.98 per kW-Month
5.30 - 11.10 per kW-Month
$
2016 - 2026
2018 - 2026
2016 - 2019
$
$
2.00
per kW-Month
2016 - 2024
$
5.80 - 9.50
per kW-Month
2015 - 2024
45 - 51
per REC
2016 - 2018
$
38 - 56
per REC
2015 - 2018
Exit price premiums of 5 percent to 22 percent are also applied on these contracts and reflect the uncertainty and illiquidity premiums that would be
required based on the most recent market activity available for similar type contracts.
Valuations using significant unobservable inputs: The following table presents changes in the Level 3 category of derivative assets and derivative
liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The derivative assets and liabilities are presented on a net basis.
(Millions of Dollars)
Derivatives, Net:
Fair Value as of January 1, 2014
Net Realized/Unrealized Gains Included in
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
Settlements
Fair Value as of December 31, 2014
Net Realized/Unrealized Losses Included in
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
Settlements
Fair Value as of December 31, 2015
$
$
$
Eversource
CL&P
NSTAR Electric
(635.2) $
(630.6) $
141.3
78.5
(415.4) $
(52.1)
86.6
(380.9) $
139.7
80.0
(410.9) $
(51.3)
81.4
(380.8) $
(7.3)
4.3
(1.5)
(4.5)
(0.8)
5.2
(0.1)
Significant increases or decreases in future energy or capacity prices in isolation would decrease or increase, respectively, the fair value of the
derivative liability. Any increases in risk premiums would increase the fair value of the derivative liability. Changes in these fair values are recorded
as a regulatory asset or liability and do not impact net income.
5.
MARKETABLE SECURITIES
Eversource maintains trusts that hold marketable securities to fund certain non-qualified executive benefits. These trusts are not subject to regulatory
oversight by state or federal agencies. CYAPC and YAEC maintain legally restricted trusts, each of which holds marketable securities, to fund the
decommissioning and spent nuclear fuel removal obligations of their nuclear fuel storage facilities.
WMECO maintained a spent nuclear fuel trust to fund WMECO’s pre-1983 spent nuclear fuel obligation. In late 2015, this trust was liquidated to
satisfy the spent nuclear fuel obligation with the DOE. For further information, see Note 8, “Long-Term Debt.”
70
Trading Securities: Eversource has elected to record certain equity securities as trading securities, with the changes in fair values recorded in Other
Income, Net on the statements of income. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, these securities were classified as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy
and totaled $14.2 million and $85.1 million, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, net gains on these securities of $2
million, $1.9 million and $10.2 million, respectively, were recorded in Other Income, Net on the statements of income. Dividend income is recorded
in Other Income, Net when dividends are declared. In 2015, certain of the securities classified as trading securities were sold and the proceeds were
re-invested in equity securities designated as available-for-sale securities.
Available-for-Sale Securities: The following is a summary of available-for-sale securities, which are recorded at fair value and are included in
current and long-term Marketable Securities on the balance sheets.
2015
Amortized
Cost
Pre-Tax
Unrealized
Gains
Pre-Tax
Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value
Amortized
Cost
Pre-Tax
Unrealized
Gains
2014
Pre-Tax
Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value
As of December 31,
$
256.5 $
215.3
4.5 $
59.2
(0.6) $
(3.4)
260.4
271.1
$
313.0 $
160.6
7.5 $
73.3
(0.3) $
-
320.2
233.9
-
-
-
-
58.2
-
(0.1)
58.1
(Millions of Dollars)
Eversource
Debt Securities (1) (2)
Equity Securities (1)
WMECO
Debt Securities (2)
(1)
Amounts include CYAPC’s and YAEC’s marketable securities held in nuclear decommissioning trusts of $436.9 million and $450.8 million as
of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Unrealized gains and losses for the nuclear decommissioning trusts are recorded in Marketable
Securities with the corresponding offset to Other Long-Term Liabilities on the balance sheets, with no impact on the statements of income.
(2)
Unrealized gains and losses on debt securities held by WMECO were recorded in Marketable Securities with the corresponding offset to Other
Long-Term Assets on the balance sheets.
Unrealized Losses and Other-than-Temporary Impairment: There have been no significant unrealized losses, other-than-temporary impairments or
credit losses in 2015 or 2014. Factors considered in determining whether a credit loss exists include the duration and severity of the impairment,
adverse conditions specifically affecting the issuer, and the payment history, ratings and rating changes of the security. For asset-backed debt
securities, underlying collateral and expected future cash flows are also evaluated.
Realized Gains and Losses: Realized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are recorded in Other Income, Net for Eversource’s benefit
trust and are offset in Other Long-Term Liabilities for CYAPC and YAEC. Eversource utilizes the specific identification basis method for the
Eversource benefit trust and the average cost basis method for the CYAPC and YAEC nuclear decommissioning trusts to compute the realized gains
and losses on the sale of available-for-sale securities.
Contractual Maturities: As of December 31, 2015, the contractual maturities of available-for-sale debt securities were as follows:
Eversource
(Millions of Dollars)
Less than one year (1)
One to five years
Six to ten years
Greater than ten years
Total Debt Securities
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
33.3 $
50.2
56.6
116.4
256.5 $
33.2
50.7
57.2
119.3
260.4
$
$
(1) Amounts in the Less than one year category include securities in the CYAPC and YAEC nuclear decommissioning trusts, which are restricted
and are classified in long-term Marketable Securities on the balance sheets.
Fair Value Measurements: The following table presents the marketable securities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis by the level in which
they are classified within the fair value hierarchy:
Eversource
(Millions of Dollars)
Level 1:
Mutual Funds and Equities
Money Market Funds
Total Level 1
Level 2:
U.S. Government Issued Debt Securities
(Agency and Treasury)
Corporate Debt Securities
Asset-Backed Debt Securities
Municipal Bonds
Other Fixed Income Securities
Total Level 2
Total Marketable Securities
$
$
$
$
$
As of December 31,
2015
2014
319.0
24.9
343.9
51.3
49.1
54.1
116.3
24.5
295.3
639.2
285.3 $
26.9
312.2 $
46.6 $
43.9
20.0
111.4
11.6
233.5 $
545.7 $
71
As of December 31, 2014, the WMECO spent nuclear fuel trust included investments in money market funds of $4.3 million classified as Level 1 in
the fair value hierarchy, and $14.7 million of corporate debt securities, $14.5 million of asset-backed debt securities, $13 million of municipal bonds
and $11.6 million of other fixed income securities classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The trust was liquidated in late 2015.
U.S. government issued debt securities are valued using market approaches that incorporate transactions for the same or similar bonds and
adjustments for yields and maturity dates. Corporate debt securities are valued using a market approach, utilizing recent trades of the same or similar
instrument and also incorporating yield curves, credit spreads and specific bond terms and conditions. Asset-backed debt securities include
collateralized mortgage obligations, commercial mortgage backed securities, and securities collateralized by auto loans, credit card loans or
receivables. Asset-backed debt securities are valued using recent trades of similar instruments, prepayment assumptions, yield curves, issuance and
maturity dates, and tranche information. Municipal bonds are valued using a market approach that incorporates reported trades and benchmark
yields. Other fixed income securities are valued using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, and discounted cash
flows.
6.
ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
Eversource, including CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO, recognizes a liability for the fair value of an ARO on the obligation date if the
liability’s fair value can be reasonably estimated and is conditional on a future event. Settlement dates and future costs are reasonably estimated
when sufficient information becomes available. Management has identified various categories of AROs, primarily certain assets containing asbestos
and hazardous contamination, and has performed fair value calculations reflecting expected probabilities for settlement scenarios.
The fair value of an ARO is recorded as a liability in Other Long-Term Liabilities with a corresponding amount included in Property, Plant and
Equipment, Net on the balance sheets. The ARO assets are depreciated, and the ARO liabilities are accreted over the estimated life of the obligation
with corresponding credits recorded as accumulated depreciation and ARO liabilities, respectively. As the Regulated companies are rate-regulated
on a cost-of-service basis, these companies apply regulatory accounting guidance and both the depreciation and accretion costs associated with the
Regulated companies’ AROs are recorded as increases to Regulatory Assets on the balance sheets.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending carrying amounts of ARO liabilities are as follows:
Eversource
(Millions of Dollars)
Balance as of Beginning of Year
Liabilities Incurred During the Year
Liabilities Settled During the Year
Accretion
Revisions in Estimated Cash Flows
Balance as of End of Year
(Millions of Dollars)
Balance as of Beginning of Year
Liabilities Incurred During the Year
Liabilities Settled During the Year
Accretion
Revisions in Estimated Cash Flows
Balance as of End of Year
$
$
$
$
As of December 31,
2014
2015
426.3 $
6.6
(18.2)
26.5
(11.1)
430.1 $
424.9
1.3
(19.5)
25.1
(5.5)
426.3
2015
CL&P
NSTAR
Electric
PSNH
WMECO
CL&P
2014
NSTAR
Electric
PSNH
As of December 31,
35.3 $
-
-
2.2
(3.7)
33.8 $
34.3 $
6.2
(1.5)
1.8
(5.5)
35.3 $
20.6 $
0.4
-
1.3
(0.7)
21.6 $
5.9 $
-
(0.1)
0.4
(0.5)
5.7 $
35.0 $
-
(1.1)
1.9
(0.5)
35.3 $
32.8 $
-
-
1.5
-
34.3 $
WMECO
4.5
1.1
-
0.3
-
5.9
19.5 $
-
-
1.1
-
20.6 $
Eversource’s amounts include CYAPC and YAEC’s AROs of $319.1 million and $317.3 million as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
The fair value of the ARO for CYAPC and YAEC includes uncertainties of the fuel off-load dates related to the DOE’s timing of performance
regarding its obligation to dispose of the spent nuclear fuel and high level waste. The incremental asset recorded as an offset to the ARO liability
was fully depreciated since the plants have no remaining useful life. Any changes in the assumptions used to calculate the fair value of the ARO
liability are recorded with a corresponding offset to the related regulatory asset. The assets held in the CYAPC and YAEC nuclear decommissioning
trusts are restricted for settling the ARO and all other decommissioning obligations. For further information on the assets held in the nuclear
decommissioning trusts, see Note 5, “Marketable Securities,” to the financial statements.
72
7.
SHORT-TERM DEBT
Short-Term Borrowing Limits: The amount of short-term borrowings that may be incurred by CL&P, NSTAR Electric and WMECO is subject to
periodic approval by the FERC. As a result of the NHPUC having jurisdiction over PSNH’s short-term debt, PSNH is not currently required to
obtain FERC approval for its short-term borrowings. On June 16, 2015, the FERC granted authorization that allows CL&P and WMECO to incur
total short-term borrowings up to a maximum of $600 million and $300 million, respectively, effective January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2017.
On June 11, 2014, the FERC granted authorization to allow NSTAR Electric to issue total short-term debt securities in an aggregate principal amount
not to exceed $655 million outstanding at any one time, effective October 24, 2014 through October 23, 2016.
PSNH is authorized by regulation of the NHPUC to incur short-term borrowings up to 10 percent of net fixed plant plus an additional $60 million
until further ordered by the NHPUC. As of December 31, 2015, PSNH’s short-term debt authorization under the 10 percent of net fixed plant test
plus $60 million totaled approximately $325 million.
CL&P’s certificate of incorporation contains preferred stock provisions restricting the amount of unsecured debt that CL&P may incur, including
limiting unsecured indebtedness with a maturity of less than 10 years to 10 percent of total capitalization. As of December 31, 2015, CL&P had
$327.3 million of unsecured debt capacity available under this authorization.
Yankee Gas and NSTAR Gas are not required to obtain approval from any state or federal authority to incur short-term debt.
Credit Agreements and Commercial Paper Programs: Eversource parent, CL&P, PSNH, WMECO, NSTAR Gas and Yankee Gas are parties to a
five-year $1.45 billion revolving credit facility. On October 26, 2015, this revolving credit facility was amended and restated and the termination
date was extended to September 4, 2020. Under the revolving credit facility, CL&P has a borrowing sublimit of $600 million, and PSNH and
WMECO each have borrowing sublimits of $300 million. The revolving credit facility serves to backstop Eversource parent’s $1.45 billion
commercial paper program. The commercial paper program allows Eversource parent to issue commercial paper as a form of short-term debt. As of
December 31, 2015 and 2014, Eversource parent had approximately $1.1 billion in short-term borrowings outstanding on each date under the
Eversource parent commercial paper program, leaving $351.5 million and $348.9 million of available borrowing capacity as of December 31, 2015
and 2014, respectively. The weighted-average interest rate on these borrowings as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 was 0.72 percent and 0.43
percent, respectively. As of December 31, 2015, there were intercompany loans from Eversource parent of $277.4 million to CL&P, $231.3 million
to PSNH and $143.4 million to WMECO. As of December 31, 2014, there were intercompany loans from Eversource parent of $133.4 million to
CL&P, $90.5 million to PSNH and $21.4 million to WMECO.
NSTAR Electric has a five-year $450 million revolving credit facility. On October 26, 2015, this revolving credit facility was amended and restated
and the termination date was extended to September 4, 2020. The facility serves to backstop NSTAR Electric’s $450 million commercial paper
program. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, NSTAR Electric had $62.5 million and $302 million, respectively, in short-term borrowings
outstanding under its commercial paper program, leaving $387.5 million and $148 million of available borrowing capacity as of December 31, 2015
and 2014, respectively. The weighted-average interest rate on these borrowings as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 was 0.40 percent and 0.27
percent, respectively.
Except as described below, amounts outstanding under the commercial paper programs are included in Notes Payable for Eversource and NSTAR
Electric and are classified in current liabilities on the balance sheets as all borrowings are outstanding for no more than 364 days at one time.
Intercompany loans from Eversource parent to CL&P, PSNH and WMECO are included in Notes Payable to Eversource Parent and are classified in
current liabilities on their respective balance sheets. Intercompany loans from Eversource to CL&P, PSNH and WMECO are eliminated in
consolidation on Eversource’s balance sheets.
On January 15, 2015, Eversource parent issued $150 million of 1.60 percent Series G Senior Notes due to mature in 2018 and $300 million of 3.15
percent Series H Senior Notes, due to mature in 2025. The proceeds, net of issuance costs, were used to repay short-term borrowings outstanding
under the Eversource parent commercial paper program. As the debt proceeds, net of issuance costs, refinanced short-term debt, the short-term debt
was classified as Long-Term Debt as of December 31, 2014. See Note 8, “Long-Term Debt,” for further information on these debt issuances.
Under the credit facilities described above, Eversource and its subsidiaries must comply with certain financial and non-financial covenants, including
a consolidated debt to total capitalization ratio. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, Eversource and its subsidiaries were in compliance with these
covenants. If Eversource or its subsidiaries were not in compliance with these covenants, an event of default would occur requiring all outstanding
borrowings by such borrower to be repaid and additional borrowings by such borrower would not be permitted under its respective credit facility.
73
8.
LONG-TERM DEBT
Details of long-term debt outstanding are as follows:
CL&P
(Millions of Dollars)
First Mortgage Bonds:
7.875% 1994 Series D due 2024
5.750% 2004 Series B due 2034
5.000% 2005 Series A due 2015
5.625% 2005 Series B due 2035
6.350% 2006 Series A due 2036
5.375% 2007 Series A due 2017
5.750% 2007 Series B due 2037
5.750% 2007 Series C due 2017
6.375% 2007 Series D due 2037
5.650% 2008 Series A due 2018
5.500% 2009 Series A due 2019
2.500% 2013 Series A due 2023
4.300% 2014 Series A due 2044
4.150% 2015 Series A due 2045
Total First Mortgage Bonds
Pollution Control Revenue Bonds:
4.375% Fixed Rate Tax Exempt due 2028
1.550% Fixed Rate Tax Exempt due 2031
Total Pollution Control Revenue Bonds
Pre-1983 Spent Nuclear Fuel Obligation
Less Amounts due Within One Year
Unamortized Premiums and Discounts, Net
Unamortized Debt Issuance Costs(1)
CL&P Long-Term Debt(1)
$
$
NSTAR Electric
(Millions of Dollars)
Debentures:
5.750% due 2036
5.625% due 2017
5.500% due 2040
2.375% due 2022
Variable Rate due 2016 (0.6036% and 0.4721% as of December 31, 2015 and 2014)
4.400% due 2044
3.250% due 2025
Total Debentures
Bonds:
7.375% Tax Exempt Sewage Facility Revenue Bonds, due 2015
Less Amounts due Within One Year
Unamortized Premiums and Discounts, Net
Unamortized Debt Issuance Costs(1)
NSTAR Electric Long-Term Debt(1)
$
$
PSNH
(Millions of Dollars)
First Mortgage Bonds:
5.60% Series M due 2035
6.15% Series N due 2017
6.00% Series O due 2018
4.50% Series P due 2019
4.05% Series Q due 2021
3.20% Series R due 2021
3.50% Series S due 2023
Total First Mortgage Bonds
Pollution Control Revenue Bonds:
Adjustable Rate Tax Exempt Series A due 2021
(0.193% and 0.175% as of December 31, 2015 and 2014)
Unamortized Premiums and Discounts, Net
Unamortized Debt Issuance Costs(1)
PSNH Long-Term Debt(1)
$
$
74
As of December 31,
2015
2014
139.8
130.0
-
100.0
250.0
150.0
150.0
100.0
100.0
300.0
250.0
400.0
250.0
350.0
2,669.8
120.5
-
120.5
-
-
(10.7)
(15.9)
2,763.7
$
$
139.8
130.0
100.0
100.0
250.0
150.0
150.0
100.0
100.0
300.0
250.0
400.0
250.0
-
2,419.8
120.5
62.0
182.5
244.5
(162.0)
(4.8)
(15.8)
2,664.2
As of December 31,
2015
2014
200.0
400.0
300.0
400.0
200.0
300.0
250.0
2,050.0
-
(200.0)
(8.5)
(11.7)
1,829.8
$
$
200.0
400.0
300.0
400.0
200.0
300.0
-
1,800.0
4.7
(4.7)
(7.3)
(11.2)
1,781.5
As of December 31,
2015
2014
$
50.0
70.0
110.0
150.0
122.0
160.0
325.0
987.0
89.3
0.1
(5.4)
1,071.0
$
50.0
70.0
110.0
150.0
122.0
160.0
325.0
987.0
89.3
-
(6.3)
1,070.0
WMECO
(Millions of Dollars)
Notes:
5.90% Senior Notes Series B, due 2034
5.24% Senior Notes Series C, due 2015
6.70% Senior Notes Series D, due 2037
5.10% Senior Notes Series E, due 2020
3.50% Senior Notes Series F, due 2021
3.88% Senior Notes Series G, due 2023
Total Notes
Pre-1983 Spent Nuclear Fuel Obligation
Less Amounts due Within One Year
Unamortized Premiums and Discounts, Net
Unamortized Debt Issuance Costs (1)
WMECO Long-Term Debt (1)
OTHER
(Millions of Dollars)
Yankee Gas - First Mortgage Bonds:
8.48% Series B due 2022
5.26% Series H due 2019
5.35% Series I due 2035
6.90% Series J due 2018
4.87% Series K due 2020
4.82% Series L due 2044
3.35% Series M due 2025
Total First Mortgage Bonds
Unamortized Premium
Unamortized Debt Issuance Costs (1)
Yankee Gas Long-Term Debt (1)
NSTAR Gas - First Mortgage Bonds:
9.95% Series J due 2020
7.11% Series K due 2033
7.04% Series M due 2017
4.46% Series N due 2020
4.35% Series O due 2045
Total First Mortgage Bonds
Unamortized Debt Issuance Costs (1)
NSTAR Gas Long-Term Debt (1)
Eversource Parent - Notes and Debentures:
4.50% Debentures due 2019
1.45% Senior Notes Series E due 2018
2.80% Senior Notes Series F due 2023
1.60% Senior Notes Series G due 2018
3.15% Senior Notes Series H due 2025
Eversource Parent Commercial Paper Borrowings
Total Eversource Parent Notes and Debentures
Pre-1983 Spent Nuclear Fuel Obligation (CYAPC)
Fair Value Adjustment (2)
Less Fair Value Adjustment - Current Portion (2)
Unamortized Premiums and Discounts, Net
Unamortized Debt Issuance Costs (1)
Total Other Long-Term Debt (1)
Total Eversource Long-Term Debt (1)
As of December 31,
2015
2014
50.0
-
40.0
95.0
250.0
80.0
515.0
-
-
5.2
(2.9)
517.3
$
$
50.0
50.0
40.0
95.0
250.0
80.0
565.0
57.4
(50.0)
6.1
(3.3)
575.2
As of December 31,
2015
2014
20.0
50.0
50.0
100.0
50.0
100.0
75.0
445.0
0.4
(1.7)
443.7
25.0
35.0
25.0
125.0
100.0
310.0
(0.8)
309.2
350.0
300.0
450.0
150.0
300.0
-
1,550.0
179.5
173.5
(28.9)
(1.3)
(1.9)
2,623.8
8,805.6
$
$
$
20.0
50.0
50.0
100.0
50.0
100.0
-
370.0
0.6
(1.5)
369.1
25.0
35.0
25.0
125.0
-
210.0
(0.6)
209.4
350.0
300.0
450.0
-
-
446.3
1,546.3
179.4
202.3
(28.9)
(1.2)
1.1
2,477.5
8,568.4
$
$
$
$
$
(1) Effective December 31, 2015, the carrying amount of Long-Term Debt includes unamortized debt issuance costs presented as a direct reduction
from the carrying amount of the debt liability, in accordance with new accounting guidance. The December 31, 2014 carrying amount of Long-
Term Debt was retrospectively adjusted to conform to the current year presentation. See Note 1C, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
– Accounting Standards,” for further information.
(2) The fair value adjustment amount is the purchase price adjustment, net of amortization, required to record the NSTAR long-term debt at fair
value on the date of the merger.
Long-Term Debt Issuances: On January 15, 2015, Eversource parent issued $150 million of 1.60 percent Series G Senior Notes, due to mature in
2018, and $300 million of 3.15 percent Series H Senior Notes, due to mature in 2025. As the debt proceeds, net of issuance costs, refinanced short-
term debt, the short-term debt was classified as Long-Term Debt as of December 31, 2014. On May 20, 2015 and December 1, 2015, CL&P issued
$300 million and $50 million, respectively, of 4.15 percent 2015 Series A First and Refunding Mortgage Bonds due to mature in 2045. On
September 10, 2015, Yankee Gas issued $75 million of 3.35 percent 2015 Series M First Mortgage Bonds due to mature in 2025. On November 18,
2015, NSTAR Electric issued $250 million of 3.25 percent debentures, due to mature in 2025. On December 8, 2015, NSTAR Gas issued $100
75
million of 4.35 percent Series O First Mortgage Bonds due to mature in 2045. The proceeds of all debt issuances, net of issuance costs, were used to
repay short-term borrowings and fund capital expenditures and working capital.
Long-Term Debt Repayments: On April 1, 2015, CL&P repaid at maturity the $100 million 5.00 percent 2005 Series A First and Refunding
Mortgage Bonds and also redeemed the $62 million 1996A Series 1.55 percent PCRBs that were subject to mandatory tender using short-term
borrowings. On August 3, 2015, WMECO repaid at maturity the $50 million 5.24 percent Series C Senior Notes, using short-term borrowings.
Long-Term Debt Issuance Authorizations: On November 25, 2015, PURA approved Yankee Gas’ request to extend the authorization period for
issuance of up to $125 million in long-term debt from December 31, 2015 to December 31, 2016. On December 4, 2015, the DPU authorized
WMECO to issue up to $100 million in long-term debt for the period through December 31, 2016. On December 4, 2015, the DPU approved
NSTAR Electric’s request to extend the authorization period for issuance of up to $250 million in long-term debt from December 31, 2015 to
December 31, 2016.
Long-Term Debt Provisions: The utility plant of CL&P, PSNH, Yankee Gas and NSTAR Gas is subject to the lien of each company’s respective
first mortgage bond indenture. The Eversource parent, NSTAR Electric and WMECO debt is unsecured. Additionally, the long-term debt
agreements provide that Eversource and certain of its subsidiaries must comply with certain covenants as are customarily included in such
agreements, including a minimum equity requirement for NSTAR Gas. Under the minimum equity requirement, the outstanding long-term debt of
NSTAR Gas must not exceed equity.
CL&P’s obligation to repay the PCRBs is secured by first mortgage bonds. The first mortgage bonds contain similar terms and provisions as the
applicable series of PCRBs. If CL&P fails to meet its obligations under the first mortgage bonds, then the holder of the first mortgage bonds (the
issuer of the PCRBs) would have rights under the first mortgage bonds. CL&P’s $120.5 million tax-exempt PCRBs will be subject to redemption at
par on or after September 1, 2021. All other long-term debt securities are subject to make-whole provisions.
PSNH’s obligation to repay the PCRBs is secured by first mortgage bonds and bond insurance. The first mortgage bonds contain similar terms and
provisions as the PCRBs. If PSNH fails to meet its obligations under the first mortgage bonds, then the holder of the first mortgage bonds (the issuer
of the PCRBs) would have rights under the first mortgage bonds. The PSNH Series A tax-exempt PCRBs are currently callable at 100 percent of par.
The PCRBs bear interest at a rate that is periodically set pursuant to auctions. PSNH is not obligated to purchase these PCRBs, which mature in
2021, from the remarketing agent.
Yankee Gas has certain long-term debt agreements that contain cross-default provisions. No other debt issuances contain cross-default provisions as
of December 31, 2015.
Pre-1983 Spent Nuclear Fuel Obligation: Under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, CL&P and WMECO were obligated to pay the DOE for the
costs of disposal of pre-1983 spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste for the period prior to the sale of their ownership shares in the
Millstone nuclear power stations, which were sold in March 2001. The DOE is responsible for the selection and development of repositories for, and
the disposal of, spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste. After the sale of the Millstone nuclear power stations in March 2001, CL&P and
WMECO remained responsible for their share of the disposal costs for nuclear fuel used to generate electricity prior to April 7, 1983 (pre-1983 Spent
Nuclear Fuel) and recorded an accrual for the full liability thereof to the DOE. This liability accrued interest costs at the 3-month Treasury bill yield
rate. As of December 31, 2014, CL&P and WMECO’s pre-1983 Spent Nuclear Fuel obligation was $244.5 million and $57.4 million, respectively,
which included accumulated interest costs of $178 million for CL&P and $41.8 million for WMECO.
In late 2015, CL&P and WMECO made payments of $244.6 million and $57.4 million, respectively, to fully satisfy their pre-1983 Spent Nuclear
Fuel obligations to the DOE, which included accumulated interest of $178 million and $41.8 million, respectively. CL&P issued debt to fund its
payment while WMECO liquidated its spent nuclear fuel trust.
In addition, as a result of consolidating CYAPC, Eversource has consolidated $179.5 million and $179.4 million, respectively, in additional pre-1983
spent nuclear fuel obligations to the DOE, which include accumulated interest costs of $130.7 million and $130.6 million as of December 31, 2015
and 2014, respectively. CYAPC maintains a trust to fund amounts due to the DOE for the disposal of pre-1983 spent nuclear fuel. For further
information, see Note 5, “Marketable Securities,” to the financial statements.
Long-Term Debt Maturities: Long-term debt maturities on debt outstanding for the years 2016 through 2020 and thereafter are shown below. These
amounts exclude the CYAPC pre-1983 spent nuclear fuel obligation, net unamortized premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs, and other fair
value adjustments as of December 31, 2015:
(Millions of Dollars)
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Thereafter
Total
Eversource
CL&P
$
$
200.0
745.0
960.0
800.0
295.0
5,736.6
8,736.6
$
$
-
250.0
300.0
250.0
-
1,990.3
2,790.3
$
NSTAR Electric
200.0
400.0
-
-
-
1,450.0
2,050.0
$
PSNH
WMECO
$
$
-
70.0
110.0
150.0
-
746.3
1,076.3
$
$
-
-
-
-
95.0
420.0
515.0
76
9.
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
Pension Benefits and Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions
A.
As of December 31, 2014, Eversource Service sponsored two defined benefit retirement plans that covered eligible employees, including, among
others, employees of CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO. Effective January 1, 2015, these two pension plans were merged into one plan,
sponsored by Eversource Service (Pension Plan). The Pension Plan is subject to the provisions of ERISA, as amended by the PPA of 2006.
Eversource’s policy is to annually fund the Pension Plan in an amount at least equal to an amount that will satisfy all federal funding requirements. In
addition to the Pension Plan, Eversource maintains non-qualified defined benefit retirement plans sponsored by Eversource Service (herein
collectively referred to as the SERP Plans), which provide benefits in excess of Internal Revenue Code limitations to eligible current and retired
participants.
As of December 31, 2014, Eversource Service also sponsored defined benefit postretirement plans that provided certain retiree benefits, primarily
medical, dental and life insurance, to retired employees that met certain age and service eligibility requirements, including, among others, employees
of CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO. Effective January 1, 2015, these postretirement plans were merged into one plan, sponsored by
Eversource Service (PBOP Plan). Under certain circumstances, eligible retirees are required to contribute to the costs of postretirement benefits. The
benefits provided under the PBOP Plan are not vested and the Company has the right to modify any benefit provision subject to applicable laws at
that time. Eversource annually funds postretirement costs through tax deductible contributions to external trusts.
Because the Regulated companies recover the retiree benefit costs from customers through rates, regulatory assets are recorded in lieu of recording an
adjustment to Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) for the funded status of the Pension, SERP and PBOP Plans. Regulatory
accounting is also applied to the portions of the Eversource Service costs that support the Regulated companies, as these costs are also recovered
from customers. Adjustments to the Pension and PBOP Plans funded status for the unregulated companies are recorded on an after-tax basis to
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss). For further information, see Note 2, “Regulatory Accounting,” and Note 14, “Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss),” to the financial statements.
For the year ended December 31, 2015, the difference between the actual return and calculated expected return on plan assets for the Pension and
PBOP Plans are reflected as a component of unrecognized actuarial gains or losses, which are recorded in Regulatory Assets or Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income/(Loss). Unrecognized actuarial gains or losses are amortized as a component of pension and PBOP expense over the
estimated average future employee service period.
Pension and SERP Plans: On January 1, 2014, NSTAR Electric & Gas was merged into Eversource Service (service company merger) and,
concurrently, all employees were transferred to the company they predominantly provide services for: Eversource Service, NSTAR Electric or
NSTAR Gas. As a result of these employee transfers, the pension and SERP assets and liabilities of NSTAR Electric & Gas were attributed by
participant and transferred to the applicable operating company’s balance sheets. This change had no impact on the income statement or net assets of
NSTAR Electric or Eversource.
The Pension and SERP Plans are accounted for under the multiple-employer approach, with each operating company’s balance sheet reflecting its
share of the funded status of the plans. Although Eversource maintains marketable securities in a benefit trust, the SERP Plans do not contain any
assets. For further information, see Note 5, “Marketable Securities,” to the financial statements. The following tables provide information on the
Pension and SERP Plan benefit obligations, fair values of Pension Plan assets, and funded status:
Eversource
(Millions of Dollars)
Change in Benefit Obligation
Benefit Obligation as of Beginning of Year
Service Cost
Interest Cost
Actuarial Gain/(Loss)
Benefits Paid - Pension
Benefits Paid - Lump Sum
Benefits Paid - SERP
Benefit Obligation as of End of Year
Change in Pension Plan Assets
Fair Value of Pension Plan Assets as of Beginning of Year
Employer Contributions
Actual Return on Pension Plan Assets
Benefits Paid
Benefits Paid - Lump Sum
Fair Value of Pension Plan Assets as of End of Year
Funded Status as of December 31st
Pension and SERP
As of December 31,
2015
2014
(5,486.2) $
(91.4)
(227.0)
331.5
238.5
149.5
5.0
(5,080.1) $
4,126.5 $
154.6
12.3
(238.5)
(149.5)
3,905.4 $
(1,174.7) $
(4,676.5)
(79.9)
(225.7)
(739.6)
230.3
-
5.2
(5,486.2)
3,985.9
171.6
199.3
(230.3)
-
4,126.5
(1,359.7)
$
$
$
$
$
77
$
(Millions of Dollars)
Change in Benefit Obligation
Benefit Obligation as of Beginning of Year
Change due to transfer of employees
Service Cost
Interest Cost
Actuarial Gain/(Loss)
Benefits Paid - Pension
Benefits Paid - Lump Sum
Benefits Paid - SERP
Benefit Obligation as of End of Year
Change in Pension Plan Assets
Fair Value of Pension Plan Assets as of Beginning of Year $
Change due to transfer of employees
Employer Contributions
Actual Return on Pension Plan Assets
Benefits Paid
Benefits Paid - Lump Sum
Fair Value of Pension Plan Assets as of End of Year
Funded Status as of December 31st
$
$
$
As of December 31, 2015
As of December 31, 2014
CL&P
NSTAR
Electric
PSNH
WMECO
CL&P
NSTAR
Electric
PSNH
WMECO
Pension and SERP
(1,230.1) $
(4.6)
(24.7)
(51.1)
77.8
60.2
14.5
0.4
(1,157.6) $
980.8 $
4.6
-
2.8
(60.2)
(14.5)
913.5 $
(244.1) $
(982.6) $
6.2
(14.9)
(40.2)
34.1
47.6
-
0.1
(949.7) $
879.0 $
(6.2)
5.0
2.7
(47.6)
-
832.9 $
(116.8) $
(580.7) $
(1.9)
(12.1)
(24.3)
38.9
23.2
9.1
0.2
(547.6) $
498.4 $
1.9
1.0
1.5
(23.2)
(9.1)
470.5 $
(77.1) $
(249.4)
(1.3)
(4.3)
(10.4)
12.6
12.7
2.5
-
(237.6)
234.0
1.3
-
0.7
(12.7)
(2.5)
220.8
(16.8)
$
$
$
$
$
(1,083.4) $
26.4
(20.2)
(50.5)
(161.0)
58.3
-
0.3
(1,230.1) $
1,016.3 $
(26.4)
-
49.2
(58.3)
-
980.8 $
(249.3) $
(1,353.3) $
479.9
(13.6)
(41.3)
(107.0)
52.4
-
0.3
(982.6) $
1,235.3 $
(441.4)
101.0
36.5
(52.4)
-
879.0 $
(103.6) $
(529.0) $
32.2
(9.7)
(23.8)
(73.3)
22.8
-
0.1
(580.7) $
528.6 $
(32.2)
-
24.8
(22.8)
-
498.4 $
(82.3) $
(223.9)
6.2
(3.5)
(10.3)
(29.8)
11.9
-
-
(249.4)
240.4
(6.2)
-
11.7
(11.9)
-
234.0
(15.4)
In August 2015, Eversource made a total lump-sum payout of $149.5 million, which reduced the projected benefit obligation and Pension Plan assets
by a corresponding amount. Therefore, the lump-sum payment had no impact on the net Accrued Pension Liability reflected on the Eversource,
CL&P, PSNH and WMECO balance sheets as of December 31, 2015.
During 2014, the Society of Actuaries released a series of updated mortality tables resulting from studies that measured mortality rates for various
groups of individuals. The updated mortality tables released in 2014 increased the life expectancy of plan participants by three to five years and had
the effect of increasing the estimated benefits to be provided to plan participants. The impact of adopting the updated mortality tables on
Eversource’s liability as of December 31, 2014 was an increase of approximately $340 million. In 2015, a revised scale for the mortality table was
released having the effect of decreasing the estimate of benefits to be provided to plan participants. The impact of the adoption of the new mortality
scale resulted in a decrease of $48 million on Eversource’s liability as of December 31, 2015.
The increase in the discount rate used to calculate the funded status resulted in a decrease on Eversource’s liability of approximately $267 million as
of December 31, 2015. Decreases in the discount rates resulted in an increase on Eversource’s liability of approximately $530 million as of
December 31, 2014.
The pension and SERP Plans’ funded status includes the current portion of the SERP liability, which is included in Other Current Liabilities on the
accompanying balance sheets.
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the accumulated benefit obligation for the Pension and SERP Plans is as follows:
(Millions of Dollars)
2015
2014
$
Eversource
CL&P
NSTAR Electric
PSNH
WMECO
4,733.2 $
5,000.1
1,062.7 $
1,101.4
888.8 $
910.4
506.4 $
524.5
222.3
226.4
The following actuarial assumptions were used in calculating the Pension and SERP Plans’ year end funded status:
Discount Rate
Compensation/Progression Rate
Pension and SERP
As of December 31,
2015
4.21 % - 4.60 %
3.50%
2014
4.20 %
3.50 %
Pension and SERP Expense: Eversource charges net periodic pension expense to its subsidiaries based on the actual participant demographic data
for each subsidiary’s participants. The actual investment return in the trust is allocated to each of the subsidiaries annually in proportion to the
investment return expected to be earned during the year. For the year ended December 31, 2013 (prior to the service company merger), the net
periodic pension expense recorded at NSTAR Electric represented the full cost of the plan with a portion of the costs allocated to affiliated
companies based on participant demographic data.
78
The components of net periodic benefit expense for the Pension and SERP Plans are shown below. The net periodic benefit expense and the
intercompany allocations less the capitalized portion of pension and SERP amounts are included in Operations and Maintenance expense on the
statements of income. Capitalized pension amounts relate to employees working on capital projects and are included in Property, Plant and
Equipment, Net on the balance sheets. Pension and SERP expense reflected in the statements of cash flows for CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and
WMECO does not include the intercompany allocations or the corresponding capitalized portion, as these amounts are cash settled on a short-term
basis.
(Millions of Dollars)
Service Cost
Interest Cost
Expected Return on Pension Plan Assets
Actuarial Loss
Prior Service Cost/(Credit)
Total Net Periodic Benefit Expense
Intercompany Allocations
Capitalized Pension Expense
(Millions of Dollars)
Service Cost
Interest Cost
Expected Return on Pension Plan Assets
Actuarial Loss
Prior Service Cost
Total Net Periodic Benefit Expense
Intercompany Allocations
Capitalized Pension Expense
(Millions of Dollars)
Service Cost
Interest Cost
Expected Return on Pension Plan Assets
Actuarial Loss
Prior Service Cost/(Credit)
Total Net Periodic Benefit Expense
Intercompany Allocations
Capitalized Pension Expense
Pension and SERP
For the Year Ended December 31, 2015
NSTAR
Electric
CL&P
PSNH (1)
Eversource (1)
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
91.4 $
227.0
(335.9)
148.5
3.7
134.7 $
N/A $
41.0 $
24.7 $
51.1
(78.9)
32.2
1.5
30.6 $
22.5 $
18.8 $
14.9 $
40.2
(70.0)
35.8
(0.1)
20.8 $
13.6 $
11.4 $
12.1 $
24.3
(40.4)
11.6
0.5
8.1 $
6.7 $
3.5 $
Pension and SERP
For the Year Ended December 31, 2014
NSTAR
Electric
PSNH
CL&P
20.2 $
50.5
(75.4)
33.7
1.8
30.8 $
26.7 $
17.6 $
13.6 $
41.3
(63.0)
23.5
-
15.4 $
10.4 $
7.9 $
9.7 $
23.8
(38.1)
11.6
0.7
7.7 $
7.6 $
3.0 $
Pension and SERP
For the Year Ended December 31, 2013
NSTAR
Electric (2)
PSNH
CL&P
24.9 $
48.3
(73.8)
55.9
1.8
57.1 $
44.9 $
28.0 $
33.1 $
58.0
(84.4)
58.1
(0.3)
64.5 $
(8.4) $
28.9 $
13.1 $
23.6
(35.4)
21.6
0.7
23.6 $
10.5 $
7.3 $
Eversource
79.9 $
225.7
(310.8)
128.4
4.4
127.6 $
N/A $
35.2 $
Eversource
102.3 $
206.7
(278.1)
210.5
4.0
245.4 $
N/A $
73.2 $
WMECO
4.3
10.4
(18.9)
6.4
0.3
2.5
4.4
1.9
WMECO
3.5
10.3
(17.9)
6.9
0.4
3.2
5.1
2.4
WMECO
4.7
10.0
(17.4)
11.8
0.4
9.5
8.0
5.2
(1)
Amounts exclude $3.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 that represent amounts included in other deferred debits.
(2)
NSTAR Electric’s allocated expense associated with the NSTAR SERP was $3.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 and was not
included in the NSTAR Electric amounts in the table above. For the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, the SERP amount is now
allocated to NSTAR Electric due to the service company merger.
The following actuarial assumptions were used to calculate Pension and SERP expense amounts:
Pension and SERP
For the Years Ended December 31,
2014
4.85 %
-
8.25 %
-
3.50 %
5.03 %
4.00 %
Discount Rate
Expected Long-Term Rate of Return
Compensation/Progression Rate
2015
4.20%
8.25 %
3.50 %
79
2013
-
8.25%
-
4.13 %
3.50 %
4.24 %
4.00 %
The following is a summary of the changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in Regulatory Assets and Other Comprehensive Income
(OCI) as well as amounts in Regulatory Assets and OCI that were reclassified as net periodic benefit expense during the years presented:
(Millions of Dollars)
Actuarial (Gains)/Losses Arising During the Year
Actuarial Losses Reclassified as Net Periodic Benefit Expense
Prior Service Cost Reclassified as Net Periodic Benefit Expense
Regulatory Assets
OCI
For the Years Ended December 31,
2015
2014
2015
2014
$
(2.0)
$
(142.3)
(3.5)
$
797.3
(122.8)
(4.2)
(6.2) $
(6.2)
(0.2)
55.9
(5.6)
(0.2)
The following is a summary of the remaining Regulatory Assets and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss amounts that have not been recognized
as components of net periodic benefit expense as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, as well as the amounts that are expected to be recognized as
components in 2016:
(Millions of Dollars)
Actuarial Loss
Prior Service Cost
$
2015
1,667.6 $
9.7
2014
1,811.9 $
13.2
Regulatory Assets as of
December 31,
Expected
2016
Expense
AOCI as of
December 31,
2015
2014
Expected
2016
Expense
120.6 $
3.4
81.1 $
0.6
93.5 $
0.8
5.4
0.2
PBOP Plan: On January 1, 2014, concurrent with the service company merger, the PBOP assets and liabilities of NSTAR Electric & Gas were
attributed by participant and transferred to the applicable operating company’s balance sheets. This change had no impact on the income statements
or net assets of NSTAR Electric or Eversource. The PBOP Plan is accounted for under the multiple-employer approach, with each operating
company’s balance sheet reflecting its share of the funded status of the plan. The following tables provide information on the PBOP Plan benefit
obligations, fair values of plan assets, and funded status:
Eversource
(Millions of Dollars)
Change in Benefit Obligation
Benefit Obligation as of Beginning of Year
Service Cost
Interest Cost
Actuarial Gain/(Loss)
Benefits Paid
Benefit Obligation as of End of Year
Change in Plan Assets
Fair Value of Plan Assets as of Beginning of Year
Actual Return on Plan Assets
Employer Contributions
Benefits Paid
Fair Value of Plan Assets as of End of Year
Funded Status as of December 31st
PBOP
As of December 31,
2015
2014
$
$
$
$
$
(1,147.9) $
(16.3)
(47.2)
106.0
54.0
(1,051.4) $
862.6 $
(4.3)
7.9
(54.0)
812.2 $
(239.2) $
(1,038.0)
(12.5)
(49.5)
(95.5)
47.6
(1,147.9)
826.5
43.7
40.0
(47.6)
862.6
(285.3)
(Millions of Dollars)
Change in Benefit Obligation
Benefit Obligation as of Beginning of Year
Change due to transfer of employees
Service Cost
Interest Cost
Actuarial Gain/(Loss)
Benefits Paid
Benefit Obligation as of End of Year
Change in Plan Assets
Fair Value of Plan Assets as of Beginning of Year
Change due to transfer of employees
Actual Return on Plan Assets
Employer Contributions
Benefits Paid
Fair Value of Plan Assets as of End of Year
Funded Status as of December 31st
2015
CL&P
NSTAR
Electric
$
$
$
$
$
(173.9) $
0.1
(2.1)
(7.2)
7.2
11.9
(164.0) $
149.0 $
-
(0.4)
-
(11.9)
136.7 $
(27.3) $
(468.7) $
2.3
(5.4)
(19.0)
59.1
18.9
(412.8) $
336.5 $
0.6
(2.8)
4.9
(18.9)
320.3 $
(92.5) $
PBOP
As of December 31,
PSNH
WMECO
CL&P
2014
NSTAR
Electric
PSNH
WMECO
(91.8) $
(0.3)
(1.4)
(3.9)
3.6
5.3
(88.5) $
80.9 $
0.2
-
-
(5.3)
75.8 $
(12.7) $
(36.6) $
-
(0.4)
(1.5)
1.5
2.6
(34.4) $
34.4 $
-
(0.1)
-
(2.6)
31.7 $
(2.7) $
(180.4) $
3.7
(2.2)
(8.1)
3.5
9.6
(173.9) $
151.3 $
(3.2)
6.3
4.2
(9.6)
149.0 $
(24.9) $
- $
(395.5)
(3.1)
(19.4)
(68.6)
17.9
(468.7) $
- $
316.7
18.4
19.3
(17.9)
336.5 $
(132.2) $
(93.5) $
4.3
(1.3)
(4.3)
(1.1)
4.1
(91.8) $
81.8 $
(3.1)
3.8
2.5
(4.1)
80.9 $
(10.9) $
(38.7)
1.0
(0.4)
(1.7)
1.3
1.9
(36.6)
35.3
(1.0)
1.6
0.4
(1.9)
34.4
(2.2)
During 2014, the Society of Actuaries released a series of updated mortality tables resulting from studies that measured mortality rates for various
groups of individuals. The updated mortality tables released in 2014 increased the life expectancy of plan participants by three to five years and had
the effect of increasing the estimated benefits to be provided to plan participants. The impact of adopting the updated mortality tables on
Eversource’s liability as of December 31, 2014 was an increase of approximately $82 million. In 2015, a revised scale for the mortality table was
80
released having the effect of decreasing the estimate of benefits to be provided to plan participants. The impact of the adoption of the new mortality
scale resulted in a decrease of $23 million on Eversource’s liability as of December 31, 2015.
The increase in the discount rate used to calculate the funded status resulted in a decrease on Eversource’s liability of approximately $60 million as of
December 31, 2015. Decreases in the discount rates resulted in an increase on Eversource’s liability of approximately $110 million as of
December 31, 2014.
The following actuarial assumptions were used in calculating the PBOP Plan’s year end funded status:
Discount Rate
Health Care Cost Trend Rate
PBOP
As of December 31,
2015
4.62 %
6.25 %
2014
4.22 %
6.50 %
PBOP Expense: Eversource charges net periodic postretirement benefits expense to its subsidiaries based on the actual participant demographic data
for each subsidiary’s participants. The actual investment return in the trust each year is allocated to each of the subsidiaries annually in proportion to
the investment return expected to be earned during the year. For the year ended December 31, 2013 (prior to the service company merger), the net
periodic postretirement expense of the NSTAR PBOP Plan allocated to NSTAR Electric was $4.6 million.
The components of net periodic benefit expense for the PBOP Plan are shown below. The net periodic benefit expense and the intercompany
allocations less the capitalized portion of PBOP are included in Operations and Maintenance on the statements of income. Capitalized PBOP amounts
relate to employees working on capital projects and are included in Property, Plant and Equipment, Net on the balance sheets. PBOP expense
reflected in the statements of cash flows for CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO does not include the intercompany allocations or the
corresponding capitalized portion, as these amounts are cash settled on a short-term basis.
PBOP
$
(Millions of Dollars)
Service Cost
Interest Cost
Expected Return on Plan Assets
Actuarial Loss
Prior Service Credit
Total Net Periodic Benefit Expense/(Income) $
Intercompany Allocations
Capitalized PBOP Expense/(Income)
$
$
(Millions of Dollars)
Service Cost
Interest Cost
Expected Return on Plan Assets
Actuarial Loss/(Gain)
Prior Service Credit
Total Net Periodic Benefit Expense/(Income) $
Intercompany Allocations
Capitalized PBOP Expense/(Income)
$
Eversource
16.3 $
47.2
(67.4)
6.8
(0.5)
2.4 $
N/A $
$
0.1
Eversource
12.5 $
49.5
(63.3)
12.2
(2.8)
8.1 $
N/A $
$
1.4
For the Year Ended December 31, 2015
NSTAR
Electric
PSNH
CL&P
2.1 $
7.2
(11.1)
0.7
-
(1.1) $
1.9 $
(0.2) $
5.4 $
19.0
(27.3)
2.3
(0.2)
(0.8) $
0.8
$
(0.2) $
1.4 $
3.9
(6.0)
0.5
-
(0.2) $
$
0.4
$
0.2
PBOP
For the Year Ended December 31, 2014
NSTAR
Electric
PSNH
CL&P
2.2 $
8.1
(10.5)
4.2
-
4.0 $
3.8 $
1.8 $
3.1 $
19.4
(25.9)
(0.5)
(1.9)
(5.8) $
$
0.8
(2.3) $
1.3 $
4.3
(5.4)
2.2
-
2.4 $
$
1.0
$
0.8
WMECO
0.4
1.5
(2.5)
-
-
(0.6)
0.3
(0.2)
WMECO
0.4
1.7
(2.3)
0.5
-
0.3
0.7
0.2
(Millions of Dollars)
Service Cost
Interest Cost
Expected Return on Plan Assets
Actuarial Loss
Prior Service Credit
Total Net Periodic Benefit Expense
Intercompany Allocations
Capitalized PBOP Expense
PBOP
For the Year Ended December 31, 2013
Eversource
CL&P
PSNH
WMECO
$
$
$
16.9 $
47.2
(55.4)
26.0
(2.1)
32.6 $
N/A $
$
8.8
3.4 $
7.9
(10.1)
7.4
-
8.6 $
7.1 $
3.9 $
2.3 $
4.0
(5.2)
3.6
-
4.7 $
$
1.6
$
1.3
0.7
1.7
(2.3)
1.1
-
1.2
1.3
0.6
81
The following actuarial assumptions were used to calculate PBOP expense amounts:
Discount Rate
Expected Long-Term Rate of Return
2015
4.22 %
8.25 %
2014
-
4.78 %
8.25 %
5.10 %
2013
-
4.04 %
8.25%
4.35 %
PBOP
For the Years Ended December 31,
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the health care cost trend rate assumptions used to determine the PBOP Plan’s funded status was 6.25 percent
and 6.5 percent, respectively, subsequently decreasing to an ultimate rate of 4.5 percent in 2023. The health care cost trend rate assumption used to
calculate the PBOP expense amount was 6.5 percent for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the health care plans. The effect of changing the assumed
health care cost trend rate by one percentage point for the year ended December 31, 2015 would have the following effects:
(Millions of Dollars)
Effect on PBOP Obligation
Effect on Total Service and Interest Cost Components
One Percentage
Point Increase
One Percentage
Point Decrease
$
115.3 $
8.5
(90.8)
(6.3)
The following is a summary of the changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in Regulatory Assets and OCI as well as amounts
recognized in Regulatory Assets and OCI that were reclassified as net periodic benefit (expense)/income during the years presented:
(Millions of Dollars)
Actuarial (Gains)/Losses Arising During the Year
Actuarial Losses Reclassified as Net Periodic Benefit Expense
Prior Service Credit Reclassified as Net Periodic Benefit Income
2015
2014
2015
2014
$
(34.1)
$
(6.4)
0.5
$
115.1
(11.6)
2.8
0.7 $
(0.4)
-
0.4
(0.6)
-
Regulatory Assets
OCI
For the Years Ended December 31,
The following is a summary of the remaining Regulatory Assets and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss amounts that have not been
recognized as components of net periodic benefit expense as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, as well as the amounts that are expected to be
recognized as components in 2016:
(Millions of Dollars)
Actuarial Loss
Prior Service Credit
Regulatory Assets as of
December 31,
2015
2014
Expected
2016
Expense
AOCI as of
December 31,
2015
2014
Expected
2016
Expense
$
152.2 $
(1.3)
192.7 $
(1.8)
4.0 $
(0.2)
6.3 $
-
6.0 $
-
0.4
-
Estimated Future Benefit Payments: The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, are expected to be paid by the Pension,
SERP and PBOP Plans:
(Millions of Dollars)
Pension and SERP
PBOP
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021-2025
$
253.5 $
60.8
272.9 $
61.2
273.9 $
61.4
283.7 $
61.8
292.7 $
62.4
1,604.3
315.4
Eversource Contributions: Eversource contributed $154.6 million to the Pension Plan in 2015, of which $5 million was contributed by NSTAR
Electric, $1 million by PSNH and the remainder by other Eversource subsidiaries, primarily Eversource Service. Based on the current status of the
Pension Plan and federal pension funding requirements, although not required to make a minimum pension contribution in 2016, Eversource
currently expects to make contributions of approximately $146 million in 2016, of which $21 million will be contributed by NSTAR Electric and $17
million by PSNH. The remaining $108 million is expected to be contributed by other Eversource subsidiaries, primarily Eversource Service.
Eversource contributed $7.9 million to the PBOP Plan in 2015, of which $4.9 million was contributed by NSTAR Electric. Eversource expects to
make approximately $9.5 million in contributions in 2016.
82
Fair Value of Pension and PBOP Plan Assets: Pension and PBOP funds are held in external trusts. Trust assets, including accumulated earnings,
must be used exclusively for Pension and PBOP payments. Eversource’s investment strategy for its Pension and PBOP Plans is to maximize the
long-term rates of return on these plans’ assets within an acceptable level of risk. The investment strategy for each asset category includes a
diversification of asset types, fund strategies and fund managers and it establishes target asset allocations that are routinely reviewed and periodically
rebalanced. PBOP assets are comprised of assets held in the PBOP Plan as well as specific assets within the defined benefit pension plan trust
(401(h) assets). The investment policy and strategy of the 401(h) assets is consistent with that of the defined benefit pension plan. Eversource’s
expected long-term rates of return on Pension and PBOP Plan assets are based on target asset allocation assumptions and related expected long-term
rates of return. In developing its expected long-term rate of return assumptions for the Pension and PBOP Plans, Eversource evaluated input from
consultants, as well as long-term inflation assumptions and historical returns. For the year ended December 31, 2015, management has assumed
long-term rates of return of 8.25 percent for the Pension and PBOP Plan assets. These long-term rates of return are based on the assumed rates of
return for the target asset allocations as follows:
As of December 31, 2015
Pension Plan and Tax-Exempt Assets Within PBOP Plan
Assumed Rate of Return
Target Asset Allocation
As of December 31, 2014
Pension Plan and Tax-Exempt Assets Within PBOP Plan
Assumed Rate of Return
Target Asset Allocation
Equity Securities:
United States
International
Emerging Markets
Private Equity
Debt Securities:
Fixed Income
High Yield Fixed Income
Emerging Markets Debt
Real Estate and Other Assets
Hedge Funds
22%
13%
5%
12%
12%
13%
5%
10%
8%
8.5%
8.5%
10%
12%
4.5%
8.5%
7.5%
7.5%
7%
24%
10%
6%
10%
15%
9%
6%
9%
11%
9%
9%
10%
13%
5%
7.5%
7.5%
7.5%
7%
The taxable assets within the PBOP Plan have a target asset allocation of 70 percent equity securities and 30 percent fixed income securities.
The following table presents, by asset category, the Pension and PBOP Plan assets recorded at fair value on a recurring basis by the level in which
they are classified within the fair value hierarchy:
Pension Plan
Fair Value Measurements as of December 31,
(Millions of Dollars)
Asset Category:
Equity Securities (1)
Private Equity
Fixed Income (2)
Real Estate and Other Assets
Hedge Funds
Total
Less: 401(h) PBOP Assets (3)
Total Pension Assets
(Millions of Dollars)
Asset Category:
Equity Securities (1)
Private Equity
Fixed Income (2)
Real Estate and Other Assets
Hedge Funds
Total
Add: 401(h) PBOP Assets (3)
Total PBOP Assets
$
$
$
$
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
2015
2014
396.5 $
7.6
-
-
-
404.1 $
985.7 $
-
432.0
117.5
49.7
1,584.9 $
305.2 $
464.7
784.8
260.3
290.8
2,105.8 $
$
1,687.4 $
472.3
1,216.8
377.8
340.5
4,094.8 $
(189.4)
3,905.4
414.7 $
18.8
10.2
-
-
443.7 $
1,035.0 $
-
561.4
132.0
20.0
1,748.4 $
292.2 $
367.9
722.0
265.8
475.0
2,122.9 $
$
Total
1,741.9
386.7
1,293.6
397.8
495.0
4,315.0
(188.5)
4,126.5
PBOP Plan
Fair Value Measurements as of December 31,
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
2015
2014
109.7 $
-
9.7
-
-
119.4 $
121.6 $
-
99.9
17.0
-
238.5 $
77.8 $
32.9
81.6
20.4
52.2
264.9 $
$
309.1 $
32.9
191.2
37.4
52.2
622.8 $
189.4
812.2
104.1 $
-
16.1
-
-
120.2 $
172.8 $
-
110.0
19.4
-
302.2 $
75.1 $
24.9
78.3
15.0
58.4
251.7 $
$
352.0
24.9
204.4
34.4
58.4
674.1
188.5
862.6
(1)
(2)
(3)
United States, International and Emerging Markets equity securities classified as Level 2 include investments in commingled funds. Level 3
investments include hedge funds that are overlayed with equity index swaps and futures contracts and funds invested in equities that have
redemption restrictions.
Fixed Income investments classified as Level 3 investments include fixed income funds that invest in a variety of opportunistic fixed income
strategies, and hedge funds that are overlayed with fixed income futures.
The assets of the Pension Plan include a 401(h) account that has been allocated to provide health and welfare postretirement benefits under the
PBOP Plan.
The Company values assets based on observable inputs when available. Equity securities, exchange traded funds and futures contracts classified as
Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy are priced based on the closing price on the primary exchange as of the balance sheet date. Commingled funds
included in Level 2 equity securities are recorded at the net asset value provided by the asset manager, which is based on the market prices of the
underlying equity securities. Swaps are valued using pricing models that incorporate interest rates and equity and fixed income index closing prices
83
to determine a net present value of the cash flows. Fixed income securities, such as government issued securities, corporate bonds and high yield
bond funds, are included in Level 2 and are valued using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or discounted cash
flows. The pricing models utilize observable inputs such as recent trades for the same or similar instruments, yield curves, discount margins and
bond structures. Hedge funds and investments in opportunistic fixed income funds are recorded at net asset value based on the values of the
underlying assets. The assets in the hedge funds and opportunistic fixed income funds are valued using observable inputs and are classified as
Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy due to redemption restrictions. Private Equity investments and Real Estate and Other Assets are valued using
the net asset value provided by the partnerships, which are based on discounted cash flows of the underlying investments, real estate appraisals or
public market comparables of the underlying investments. These investments are classified as Level 3 due to redemption restrictions.
Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3): The following tables present changes in the Level 3 category of
Eversource’s Pension and PBOP Plan assets for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014:
(Millions of Dollars)
Balance as of January 1, 2014
Actual Return/(Loss) on Plan Assets:
Relating to Assets Still Held as of Year End
Relating to Assets Distributed During the Year
Purchases, Sales and Settlements
Balance as of December 31, 2014
Transfer Between Categories
Actual Return/(Loss) on Plan Assets:
Relating to Assets Still Held as of Year End
Relating to Assets Distributed During the Year
Purchases, Sales and Settlements
Balance as of December 31, 2015
(Millions of Dollars)
Balance as of January 1, 2014
Actual Return/(Loss) on Plan Assets:
Relating to Assets Still Held as of Year End
Relating to Assets Distributed During the Year
Purchases, Sales and Settlements
Balance as of December 31, 2014
Actual Return/(Loss) on Plan Assets:
Relating to Assets Still Held as of Year End
Relating to Assets Distributed During the Year
Purchases, Sales and Settlements
Balance as of December 31, 2015
Equity
Securities
Private
Equity
Fixed
Income
Real Estate and
Other Assets
Hedge
Funds
Total
$
255.5 $
300.3 $
589.5 $
288.5 $
416.9 $
1,850.7
Pension Plan
(2.3)
-
39.0
292.2 $
76.5
5.3
-
(68.8)
305.2 $
14.0
13.9
39.7
367.9 $
-
24.4
27.3
45.1
464.7 $
45.2
(6.2)
93.5
722.0 $
-
(6.7)
17.0
52.5
784.8 $
$
$
(3.6)
28.3
(47.4)
265.8 $
-
(7.1)
24.8
(23.2)
260.3 $
23.5
(15.2)
49.8
475.0 $
(76.5)
-
(0.9)
(106.8)
290.8 $
76.8
20.8
174.6
2,122.9
-
15.9
68.2
(101.2)
2,105.8
Equity
Securities
Private
Equity
Fixed
Income
Real Estate and
Other Assets
Hedge
Funds
Total
$
69.1 $
17.9 $
51.5 $
33.9 $
57.0 $
229.4
PBOP Plan
6.0
-
-
75.1 $
(2.0)
-
4.7
77.8 $
1.3
0.1
5.6
24.9 $
2.6
-
5.4
32.9 $
1.9
-
24.9
78.3 $
2.1
(0.3)
1.5
81.6 $
$
$
(2.8)
(2.2)
(13.9)
15.0 $
0.3
-
5.1
20.4 $
1.4
-
-
58.4 $
(1.5)
-
(4.7)
52.2 $
7.8
(2.1)
16.6
251.7
1.5
(0.3)
12.0
264.9
Defined Contribution Plans
B.
Effective January 1, 2014, Eversource maintains one defined contribution plan on behalf of eligible participants, the Eversource 401k Plan. The
Eversource 401k Plan provides for employee and employer contributions up to statutory limits. For eligible employees, the Eversource 401k Plan
provides employer matching contributions of either 100 percent up to a maximum of three percent of eligible compensation or 50 percent up to a
maximum of eight percent of eligible compensation. Beginning in 2014 for newly hired employees, the Eversource 401k Plan provides employer
matching contributions of 100 percent up to a maximum of three percent of eligible compensation.
The Eversource 401k Plan also contains a K-Vantage feature for the benefit of eligible participants, which provides an additional annual employer
contribution based on age and years of service. K-Vantage participants are not eligible to actively participate in the Eversource Pension Plan.
The total defined Eversource 401k Plan employer matching contributions, including the K-Vantage contributions, were as follows:
(Millions of Dollars)
2015
2014
2013
Eversource
CL&P
$
30.4 $
29.7
37.0
4.8 $
5.0
5.1
NSTAR
Electric
6.3 $
6.3
8.5
PSNH
WMECO
3.4 $
3.2
3.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
Allocations of Eversource common shares were made from Eversource treasury shares to satisfy a portion of the Eversource 401k Plan obligation,
which provides 100 percent of the matching contribution in Eversource common shares. For treasury shares used to satisfy the Eversource 401k Plan
employer matching contributions, compensation expense is recognized equal to the fair value of shares that have been allocated to participants. Any
difference between the fair value and the average cost of the allocated treasury shares is charged or credited to Capital Surplus, Paid In on the balance
sheet. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, Eversource recognized $7 million, $22 million and $9.1 million, respectively, of
compensation expense related to treasury shares used to satisfy the matching contribution.
84
Share-Based Payments
C.
Share-based compensation awards are recorded using a fair-value-based method at the date of grant. Eversource, CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH
and WMECO record compensation expense related to these awards, as applicable, for shares issued or sold to their respective employees and
officers, as well as for the allocation of costs associated with shares issued or sold to Eversource’s service company employees and officers that
support CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO.
Eversource Incentive Plans: Eversource maintains long-term equity-based incentive plans in which Eversource, CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and
WMECO employees, officers and board members are eligible to participate. The incentive plans authorize Eversource to grant up to 8,000,000 new
shares for various types of awards, including RSUs and performance shares, to eligible employees, officers, and board members. As of
December 31, 2015 and 2014, Eversource had 3,005,010 and 3,112,020 common shares, respectively, available for issuance under these plans.
Eversource accounts for its various share-based plans as follows:
•
RSUs - Eversource records compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period based
upon the fair value of Eversource’s common shares at the date of grant. The par value of RSUs is reclassified to Common Stock from APIC as
RSUs become issued as common shares.
•
•
•
Performance Shares - Eversource records compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, on a straight-line basis over the requisite service
period. Performance shares vest based upon the extent to which Company goals are achieved. Vesting of outstanding performance shares is
based upon both the Company’s EPS growth over the requisite service period and the total shareholder return as compared to the Edison Electric
Institute (EEI) Index during the requisite service period. The fair value of performance shares is determined at the date of grant using a lattice
model.
Stock Options - Stock options currently outstanding are fully vested.
ESPP Shares - For shares sold under the ESPP, no compensation expense was recorded as the ESPP qualified as a non-compensatory plan. The
ESPP ended as of February 1, 2016.
RSUs: Eversource granted RSUs under the annual long-term incentive programs that are subject to three-year graded vesting schedules for
employees, and one-year graded vesting schedules, or immediate vesting, for board members. RSUs are paid in shares, reduced by amounts
sufficient to satisfy withholdings for income taxes, subsequent to vesting. A summary of RSU transactions is as follows:
Outstanding as of December 31, 2014
Granted
Shares issued
Forfeited
Outstanding as of December 31, 2015
RSUs
(Units)
1,380,747
266,230
(888,495)
(29,174)
729,308
$
$
$
$
$
Weighted Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
35.67
54.57
33.94
46.68
43.45
The weighted average grant-date fair value of RSUs granted for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 was $54.57, $42.27 and $39.56,
respectively. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the number and weighted average grant-date fair value of unvested RSUs was 469,772 and $48.58
per share, and 1,024,729 and $38.14 per share, respectively. During 2015, there were 784,376 RSUs at a weighted average grant-date fair value of
$37.21 per share that vested and were either paid or deferred. As of December 31, 2015, 259,536 RSUs were fully vested and deferred and an
additional 446,283 are expected to vest.
Performance Shares: Eversource granted performance shares under the annual long-term incentive programs that vest based upon the extent to
which Company goals are achieved at the end of three-year performance measurement periods. Performance shares are paid in shares, after the
performance measurement period. A summary of performance share transactions is as follows:
Outstanding as of December 31, 2014
Granted
Shares issued
Forfeited
Outstanding as of December 31, 2015
Performance
Shares
(Units)
Weighted Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
375,644
172,543
(4,604)
(15,155)
528,428
$
$
$
$
$
42.20
55.04
42.23
45.33
46.30
The weighted average grant-date fair value of Performance Shares granted for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 was $55.04,
$43.40 and $40.96, respectively. As of December 31, 2015, all outstanding performance shares are unvested.
85
The total compensation expense and associated future income tax benefits recognized by Eversource, CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO
for share-based compensation awards were as follows:
Eversource
(Millions of Dollars)
Compensation Expense
Future Income Tax Benefit
2015
For the Years Ended December 31,
2014
2013
$
23.1 $
9.4
24.6 $
10.3
27.0
10.7
(Millions of Dollars)
Compensation Expense
Future Income Tax Benefit
2015
CL&P
NSTAR
Electric
For the Years Ended December 31,
2014
PSNH
WMECO
CL&P
NSTAR
Electric
PSNH
WMECO
CL&P
2013
NSTAR
Electric
PSNH
$
9.3 $
3.8
5.8 $
2.4
3.2 $
1.3
1.7 $
0.7
8.1 $
3.4
7.4 $
3.1
3.0 $
1.3
1.3 $
0.5
6.8 $
2.7
7.5 $
3.0
WMECO
1.3
0.5
2.3 $
0.9
As of December 31, 2015, there was $14.9 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested share-based awards for
Eversource, including $6.1 million for CL&P, $3.8 million for NSTAR Electric, $2.2 million for PSNH and $1.2 million for WMECO. This cost is
expected to be recognized ratably over a weighted-average period of 1.74 years for Eversource, and 1.73 years for each CL&P, NSTAR Electric,
PSNH and WMECO.
For each of the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, changes in excess tax benefits totaling $9.5 million increased cash flows from financing
activities. For the year ended December 31, 2013, changes in excess tax benefits totaling $5.5 million decreased cash flows from financing activities.
Stock Options: Stock options currently outstanding were granted under the NSTAR Incentive Plan, expire ten years from the date of grant and are
fully vested. The weighted average remaining contractual lives for the options outstanding as of December 31, 2015 is 2.6 years. A summary of
stock option transactions is as follows:
Outstanding and Exercisable - December 31, 2014
Exercised
Outstanding and Exercisable - December 31, 2015
Options
351,616
(179,744)
171,872
$
$
$
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
Intrinsic Value
(Millions)
26.69
26.90
26.47
$
$
$
9.4
4.4
4.2
Cash received for options exercised during the year ended December 31, 2015 totaled $4.8 million. The tax benefit realized from stock options
exercised totaled $1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Employee Share Purchase Plan: Eversource maintained an ESPP for eligible employees, which allowed for Eversource common shares to be
purchased by employees at the end of successive six-month offering periods at 95 percent of the closing market price on the last day of each six-
month period. Employees were permitted to purchase shares having a value not exceeding 25 percent of their compensation as of the beginning of
the offering period up to a specified limit. The ESPP qualified as a non-compensatory plan under accounting guidance for share-based payments, and
no compensation expense was recorded for ESPP purchases.
During 2015, employees purchased 33,715 shares at discounted prices of $52.80 and $47.23. Employees purchased 40,779 shares in 2014 at
discounted prices of $41.61 and $41.71. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, 743,260 and 776,975 shares, respectively, remained available for future
issuance under the ESPP. The ESPP ended as of February 1, 2016.
An income tax rate of 40 percent is used to estimate the tax effect on total share-based payments determined under the fair value-based method for all
awards. The Company generally settles stock option exercises and fully vested RSUs and performance shares with the issuance of common shares
purchased in the open market.
Other Retirement Benefits
D.
Eversource provides retirement and other benefits for certain current and past company officers. These benefits are accounted for on an accrual basis
and expensed over a period equal to the service lives of the employees. The actuarially-determined liability for these benefits, which is included in
Other Long-Term Liabilities on the balance sheets, as well as the related expense included in Operations and Maintenance on the income statements,
are as follows:
Eversource
(Millions of Dollars)
Actuarially-Determined Liability
Other Retirement Benefits Expense
(Millions of Dollars)
Actuarially-Determined Liability
Other Retirement Benefits Expense
As of and For the Years Ended December 31,
2014
2015
2013
$
55.2 $
3.9
57.5 $
4.5
51.3
4.4
2015
2014
2013
As of and For the Years Ended December 31,
CL&P
NSTAR
Electric
PSNH
WMECO
CL&P
NSTAR
Electric
PSNH
WMECO
CL&P
PSNH
$
0.4 $
1.5
- $
1.0
2.4 $
0.7
0.2 $
0.3
0.4 $
2.1
- $
0.3
2.6 $
0.9
0.2 $
0.4
0.4 $
2.5
86
WMECO
0.1
0.5
2.3 $
1.0
10.
INCOME TAXES
The components of income tax expense are as follows:
Eversource
(Millions of Dollars)
Current Income Taxes:
Federal
State
Total Current
Deferred Income Taxes, Net:
Federal
State
Total Deferred
Investment Tax Credits, Net
Income Tax Expense
$
$
2015
For the Years Ended December 31,
2014
2013
6.2 $
45.7
51.9
436.1
55.6
491.7
(3.6)
540.0 $
4.4 $
24.5
28.9
406.8
36.5
443.3
(3.9)
468.3 $
8.8
(9.4)
(0.6)
386.2
45.4
431.6
(4.1)
426.9
(Millions of Dollars)
Current Income Taxes:
Federal
State
Total Current
Deferred Income
Taxes, Net:
Federal
State
Total Deferred
Investment Tax
Credits, Net
Income Tax Expense
2015
For the Years Ended December 31,
2014
CL&P
NSTAR
Electric
PSNH
WMECO CL&P
NSTAR
Electric
PSNH
WMECO
CL&P
2013
NSTAR
Electric
PSNH
WMECO
$
26.9 $
15.8
42.7
36.3 $
19.8
56.1
(16.7) $
6.0
(10.7)
(3.5) $
1.6
(1.9)
(0.2) $
4.3
4.1
75.0 $
20.2
95.2
(22.6) $
(0.1)
(22.7)
1.9 $
1.8
3.7
20.1 $
(6.7)
13.4
95.8 $
29.6
125.4
(8.2) $
3.6
(4.6)
(53.4)
4.2
(49.2)
135.8
0.2
136.0
147.5
25.7
173.2
74.5
9.3
83.8
33.4
6.0
39.4
138.0
(7.1)
130.9
88.0
20.1
108.1
79.6
15.2
94.8
28.1
6.0
34.1
114.9
15.1
130.0
49.8
(1.0)
48.8
64.5
11.2
75.7
(1.3)
177.4 $
(1.3)
228.0 $
-
73.1 $
(0.5)
37.0 $
(1.5)
133.5 $
(1.3)
202.0 $
$
-
72.1 $
(0.5)
37.3 $
(1.7)
141.7 $
(1.3)
172.9 $
-
71.1 $
84.7
2.3
87.0
(0.4)
37.4
A reconciliation between income tax expense and the expected tax expense at the statutory rate is as follows:
Eversource
(Millions of Dollars, except percentages)
Income Before Income Tax Expense
2015
For the Years Ended December 31,
2014
2013
$
1,425.9 $
1,295.4 $
1,220.6
Statutory Federal Income Tax Expense at 35%
Tax Effect of Differences:
Depreciation
Investment Tax Credit Amortization
Other Federal Tax Credits
State Income Taxes, Net of Federal Impact
Dividends on ESOP
Tax Asset Valuation Allowance/Reserve Adjustments
Other, Net
Income Tax Expense
Effective Tax Rate
$
499.1
453.4
(4.6)
(3.6)
(3.8)
61.1
(8.1)
4.7
(4.8)
540.0 $
37.9%
(5.6)
(3.9)
(3.5)
42.5
(8.0)
(2.9)
(3.7)
468.3 $
36.2%
427.2
(7.4)
(4.1)
(3.7)
27.6
(8.0)
(4.3)
(0.4)
426.9
35.0%
87
(Millions of Dollars,
except percentages)
Income Before Income
Tax Expense
Statutory Federal Income
Tax Expense at 35%
Tax Effect of Differences:
Depreciation
Investment Tax Credit
Amortization
Other Federal Tax Credits
State Income Taxes,
Net of Federal Impact
Tax Asset Valuation
Allowance/Reserve
Adjustments
Other, Net
Income Tax Expense
Effective Tax Rate
2015
For the Years Ended December 31,
2014
CL&P
NSTAR
Electric
PSNH
WMECO
CL&P
NSTAR
Electric
PSNH
WMECO
CL&P
2013
NSTAR
Electric
PSNH
WMECO
$
476.8 $
572.6 $
187.5 $
93.5 $
421.2 $
505.1 $
186.1 $
95.1 $
421.1 $
441.4 $
182.5 $
97.8
166.9
200.4
65.6
32.7
147.4
176.8
65.1
33.3
147.4
154.5
63.9
34.2
(1.7)
(1.4)
0.5
(0.3)
(3.6)
(1.3)
0.3
(0.2)
(7.0)
0.1
0.6
-
(1.3)
-
(1.3)
-
-
(3.8)
(0.5)
-
(1.5)
-
(1.3)
-
-
(3.5)
(0.5)
-
(1.7)
-
(1.3)
-
-
(3.7)
(0.4)
-
9.2
29.6
9.9
4.9
4.4
26.2
9.8
5.0
5.0
18.6
9.6
4.2
1.2
3.1
177.4 $
37.2%
-
0.7
228.0 $
39.8%
-
0.9
73.1 $
39.0%
-
0.2
37.0 $
39.6%
(6.3)
(6.9)
133.5 $
31.7%
-
1.6
202.0 $
40.0%
-
0.4
72.1 $
38.7%
-
(0.3)
37.3 $
39.2%
0.4
(2.4)
141.7 $
33.6%
-
1.0
172.9 $
39.2%
-
0.7
71.1 $
39.0%
-
(0.6)
37.4
38.2%
$
Eversource, CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO file a consolidated federal income tax return and unitary, combined and separate state
income tax returns. These entities are also parties to a tax allocation agreement under which taxable subsidiaries do not pay any more taxes than they
would have otherwise paid had they filed a separate company tax return, and subsidiaries generating tax losses, if any, are paid for their losses when
utilized.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax basis of
assets and liabilities. The tax effect of temporary differences is accounted for in accordance with the rate-making treatment of the applicable
regulatory commissions and relevant accounting authoritative literature. The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to the net
accumulated deferred income tax obligations are as follows:
Eversource
(Millions of Dollars)
Deferred Tax Assets:
Employee Benefits
Derivative Liabilities
Regulatory Deferrals - Liabilities
Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts
Tax Effect - Tax Regulatory Liabilities
Federal Net Operating Loss Carryforwards
Purchase Accounting Adjustment
Other
Total Deferred Tax Assets
Less: Valuation Allowance
Net Deferred Tax Assets
Deferred Tax Liabilities:
Accelerated Depreciation and Other Plant-Related Differences
Property Tax Accruals
Regulatory Amounts:
Regulatory Deferrals - Assets
Tax Effect - Tax Regulatory Assets
Goodwill Regulatory Asset - 1999 Merger
Derivative Assets
Other
Total Deferred Tax Liabilities
As of December 31,
2015
2014
$
$
$
$
637.5 $
172.7
243.5
60.5
9.7
5.4
119.3
197.1
1,445.7
3.7
1,442.0 $
4,602.6 $
76.7
1,289.1
249.3
194.9
17.7
159.4
6,589.7 $
632.2
199.6
366.7
60.5
10.0
59.1
126.2
198.7
1,653.0
5.1
1,647.9
4,215.9
109.6
1,277.9
240.2
203.2
32.6
196.3
6,275.7
88
(Millions of Dollars)
Deferred Tax Assets:
Employee Benefits
Derivative Liabilities
Regulatory Deferrals - Liabilities
Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts
Tax Effect - Tax Regulatory Liabilities
Federal Net Operating Loss Carryforwards
Other
Total Deferred Tax Assets
Less: Valuation Allowance
Net Deferred Tax Assets
Deferred Tax Liabilities:
Accelerated Depreciation and Other
Plant-Related Differences
Property Tax Accruals
Regulatory Amounts:
Regulatory Deferrals - Assets
Tax Effect - Tax Regulatory Assets
Goodwill Regulatory Asset - 1999 Merger
Derivative Assets
Other
Total Deferred Tax Liabilities
$
$
$
$
2015
CL&P
NSTAR
Electric
PSNH
WMECO
CL&P
2014
NSTAR
Electric
PSNH
WMECO
As of December 31,
126.1 $
165.7
36.0
30.4
3.1
-
55.5
416.8
3.1
413.7 $
91.3 $
0.6
109.4
8.5
1.5
-
3.4
214.7
-
214.7 $
37.1 $
-
42.1
3.6
2.3
2.4
61.1
148.6
-
148.6 $
10.0 $
-
6.1
4.5
2.4
0.4
5.0
28.4
-
28.4 $
129.0 $
193.0
73.9
32.3
3.1
-
53.8
485.1
4.0
481.1 $
39.9 $
1.8
181.3
13.8
1.8
-
19.9
258.5
-
258.5 $
46.8 $
-
46.5
3.2
2.1
32.1
48.9
179.6
-
179.6 $
1,545.6 $
27.3
1,387.1 $
22.8
655.3 $
7.3
416.1 $
10.6
1,378.6 $
58.1
1,296.9 $
25.0
596.6 $
7.4
456.8
168.7
-
17.7
18.5
2,234.6 $
339.7
36.0
167.4
-
22.0
1,975.0 $
137.9
15.4
-
-
38.6
854.5 $
60.5
9.0
-
-
2.7
498.9 $
502.3
166.9
-
32.6
19.4
2,157.9 $
276.0
35.5
174.4
-
33.5
1,841.3 $
147.6
15.9
-
-
35.6
803.1 $
9.2
-
11.4
3.8
2.5
4.5
4.9
36.3
-
36.3
385.8
12.8
60.4
9.3
-
-
2.8
471.1
Carryforwards: The following tables provide the amounts and expiration dates of state tax credit and loss carryforwards and federal tax credit and
net operating loss carryforwards:
(Millions of Dollars)
Federal Net Operating Loss
Federal Tax Credit
Federal Charitable Contribution
State Tax Credit
State Charitable Contribution
(Millions of Dollars)
Federal Net Operating Loss
Federal Tax Credit
Federal Charitable Contribution
State Tax Credit
State Loss Carryforwards
State Charitable Contribution
As of December 31, 2015
Eversource
$
15.5 $
26.1
14.9
101.2
3.0
CL&P
NSTAR
Electric
- $
- $
0.1
-
73.8
-
0.2
-
-
-
PSNH
WMECO Expiration Range
7.0 $
15.0
-
-
-
1.0
-
-
-
-
2032
2031 - 2035
2016 - 2018
2015 - 2020
2015 - 2019
As of December 31, 2014
Eversource
$
168.8 $
16.3
19.4
99.7
40.6
2.1
CL&P
NSTAR
Electric
PSNH
- $
- $
0.1
-
71.0
-
-
0.2
-
-
-
-
WMECO Expiration Range
2031 - 2032
2031 - 2034
2016 - 2018
2014 - 2019
2014 - 2034
2015 - 2018
12.7
-
-
-
-
-
91.8 $
11.1
-
-
-
-
In 2015, the Company decreased its valuation allowance reserve for state credits and state loss carryforwards by $1.3 million (CL&P $0.9 million),
net of tax, to reflect an update for expired state tax credits and loss carryforwards.
In 2014, the Company recorded a reduction to its state credit carryforwards of $11 million (CL&P $10.1 million), net of tax, as a result of an update
to reflect the amounts expired. Further, the Company decreased its valuation allowance reserve for state credits by $19.2 million at CL&P, net of tax,
to reflect an update for expired state credits and latest estimate of usage.
For 2015 and 2014, state credit and state loss carryforwards have been partially reserved by a valuation allowance of $3.1 million and $4.4 million
(net of tax), respectively.
89
Unrecognized Tax Benefits: A reconciliation of the activity in unrecognized tax benefits, all of which would impact the effective tax rate if
recognized, is as follows:
(Millions of Dollars)
Balance as of January 1, 2013
Gross Increases - Current Year
Gross Decreases - Prior Year
Settlements
Lapse of Statute of Limitations
Balance as of December 31, 2013
Gross Increases - Current Year
Gross Increases - Prior Year
Lapse of Statute of Limitations
Balance as of December 31, 2014
Gross Increases - Current Year
Gross Increases - Prior Year
Lapse of Statute of Limitations
Balance as of December 31, 2015
Eversource
CL&P
$
$
83.1 $
8.2
(1.1)
(49.8)
(2.2)
38.2
9.3
0.3
(1.6)
46.2
9.9
0.1
(8.2)
48.0 $
49.0
2.1
(0.3)
(39.4)
-
11.4
2.7
0.2
-
14.3
2.6
-
(3.4)
13.5
Interest and Penalties: Interest on uncertain tax positions is recorded and generally classified as a component of Other Interest Expense on the
statements of income. However, when resolution of uncertainties results in the Company receiving interest income, any related interest benefit is
recorded in Other Income, Net on the statements of income. No penalties have been recorded. The amount of interest expense/(income) on uncertain
tax positions recognized and the related accrued interest payable/(receivable) are as follows:
(Millions of Dollars)
Eversource
CL&P
$
Other Interest Expense/(Income)
For the Years Ended December 31,
2014
2013
2015
Accrued Interest Expense
As of December 31,
2015
2014
0.1 $
-
0.4 $
-
(8.6)
(4.0)
$
2.0 $
-
1.9
-
Tax Positions: During 2015 and 2014, Eversource did not resolve any of its uncertain tax positions.
Open Tax Years: The following table summarizes Eversource, CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO’s tax years that remain subject to
examination by major tax jurisdictions as of December 31, 2015:
Description
Federal
Connecticut
Massachusetts
New Hampshire
Tax Years
2015
2012 - 2015
2012 - 2015
2012 - 2015
Eversource estimates that during the next twelve months, differences of a non-timing nature could be resolved, resulting in a zero to $2.3 million
decrease in unrecognized tax benefits by Eversource. These estimated changes are not expected to have a material impact on the earnings of
Eversource. Other companies’ impacts are not expected to be material.
2015 Federal Legislation: On December 18, 2015, the “Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes” Act became law, which extended the accelerated
deduction of depreciation to businesses from 2015 through 2019. This extended stimulus provides Eversource with cash flow benefits in 2016 of
approximately $275 million (including approximately $105 million for CL&P, $72 million for NSTAR Electric, $46 million for PSNH, and $25
million for WMECO) due to a refund of taxes paid in 2015 and lower expected tax payments in 2016 of approximately $300 million.
2015 Connecticut Legislation: In 2015, the state of Connecticut enacted several changes to its corporate tax laws. Among the changes, commencing
as of January 1, 2015, is the reduction in the amount of tax credits that corporations can utilize against its tax liability in a year and a continuation of
the corporate income tax surcharge through 2018, which effectively increases the state corporate tax rate to 9 percent for the years 2016 and 2017 and
8.25 percent for 2018. Also, effective January 1, 2016, all Connecticut companies have a mandatory unitary tax filing requirement. Management
continues to review the tax law changes and their impact on the effective tax rates of Eversource and CL&P.
2014 Federal Legislation: On December 19, 2014, the “Tax Increase Prevention Act of 2014” became law, which extended the accelerated
deduction of depreciation to businesses through 2014. This extended stimulus provided Eversource with cash flow benefits of approximately $250
million (approximately $86 million at CL&P, $64 million at NSTAR Electric, $44 million at PSNH, and $21 million at WMECO) in 2015.
11.
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Environmental Matters
A.
General: Eversource, CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO are subject to environmental laws and regulations intended to mitigate or
remove the effect of past operations and improve or maintain the quality of the environment. These laws and regulations require the removal or the
remedy of the effect on the environment of the disposal or release of certain specified hazardous substances at current and former operating sites.
Eversource, CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO have an active environmental auditing and training program and believe that they are
substantially in compliance with all enacted laws and regulations.
90
Environmental reserves are accrued when assessments indicate it is probable that a liability has been incurred and an amount can be reasonably
estimated. The approach used estimates the liability based on the most likely action plan from a variety of available remediation options, including
no action required or several different remedies ranging from establishing institutional controls to full site remediation and monitoring. These
liabilities are estimated on an undiscounted basis and do not assume that the amounts are recoverable from insurance companies or other third parties.
The environmental reserves include sites at different stages of discovery and remediation and do not include any unasserted claims.
These estimates are subjective in nature as they take into consideration several different remediation options at each specific site. The reliability and
precision of these estimates can be affected by several factors, including new information concerning either the level of contamination at the site, the
extent of Eversource, CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO’s responsibility for remediation or the extent of remediation required, recently
enacted laws and regulations or changes in cost estimates due to certain economic factors. It is possible that new information or future developments
could require a reassessment of the potential exposure to related environmental matters. As this information becomes available, management will
continue to assess the potential exposure and adjust the reserves accordingly.
The amounts recorded as environmental reserves included in Other Current Liabilities and Other Long-Term Liabilities on the balance sheets
represent management’s best estimate of the liability for environmental costs, and take into consideration site assessment, remediation and long-term
monitoring costs. The environmental reserves also take into account recurring costs of managing hazardous substances and pollutants, mandated
expenditures to remediate previously contaminated sites and any other infrequent and non-recurring clean-up costs. A reconciliation of the activity in
the environmental reserves is as follows:
(Millions of Dollars)
Balance as of January 1, 2014
Additions
Payments/Reductions
Balance as of December 31, 2014
Additions
Payments/Reductions
Balance as of December 31, 2015
$
$
Eversource
CL&P
NSTAR Electric
PSNH
WMECO
35.4 $
12.7
(4.8)
43.3
13.5
(5.7)
51.1 $
3.4 $
1.0
(0.6)
3.8
1.3
(0.5)
4.6 $
1.2 $
-
(0.1)
1.1
2.0
(0.7)
2.4 $
5.4 $
0.1
(0.3)
5.2
2.3
(3.0)
4.5 $
0.4
0.2
(0.1)
0.5
0.2
(0.1)
0.6
The number of related environmental sites and reserves for which remediation or long-term monitoring, preliminary site work or site assessment is
being performed are as follows:
Eversource
CL&P
NSTAR Electric
PSNH
WMECO
As of December 31, 2015
As of December 31, 2014
Number of Sites
Reserve
(in millions)
Number of Sites
Reserve
(in millions)
$
64
14
15
12
4
51.1
4.6
2.4
4.5
0.6
$
65
16
13
13
4
43.3
3.8
1.1
5.2
0.5
Included in the Eversource number of sites and reserve amounts above are former MGP sites that were operated several decades ago and
manufactured gas from coal and other processes, which resulted in certain by-products remaining in the environment that may pose a potential risk to
human health and the environment, for which Eversource may have potential liability. The reserve balances related to these former MGP sites were
$45.5 million and $38.8 million as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and related primarily to the natural gas business segment.
As of December 31, 2015, for 9 environmental sites (3 for CL&P, 1 for WMECO) that are included in the Company’s reserve for environmental
costs, the information known and the nature of the remediation options allow for the Company to estimate the range of losses for environmental
costs. As of December 31, 2015, $24.7 million (including $1.7 million for CL&P and $0.3 million for WMECO) had been accrued as a liability for
these sites, which represents the low end of the range of the liabilities for environmental costs. Management believes that additional losses of up to
approximately $33.9 million (approximately $1.4 million for CL&P, and $0.1 million for WMECO) may be incurred in remediating these sites.
As of December 31, 2015, for 12 environmental sites (3 for CL&P and 2 for NSTAR Electric) that are included in the Company’s reserve for
environmental costs, management cannot reasonably estimate the exposure to loss in excess of the reserve, or range of loss, as these sites are under
investigation and/or there is significant uncertainty as to what remedial actions, if any, the Company may be required to undertake. As of
December 31, 2015, $13.7 million (including $2 million for CL&P) had been accrued as a liability for these sites. As of December 31, 2015, for the
remaining 43 environmental sites (including 8 for CL&P, 13 for NSTAR Electric, 12 for PSNH, and 3 for WMECO) that are included in the
Company’s reserve for environmental costs, the $12.7 million accrual (including $0.9 million for CL&P, $2.4 million for NSTAR Electric, $4.5
million for PSNH, and $0.3 million for WMECO) represents management’s best estimate of the potential liability and no additional loss is
anticipated at this time.
CERCLA: Of the total environmental sites, nine sites (four for NSTAR Electric and three for PSNH) are superfund sites under the federal
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) and its amendments or state equivalents for which the
Company has been notified that it is a potentially responsible party but for which the site assessment and remediation are not being managed by the
Company. As of December 31, 2015, a liability of $0.8 million accrued on these sites represents management’s best estimate of its potential
remediation costs with respect to these superfund sites.
91
Environmental Rate Recovery: PSNH, NSTAR Gas and Yankee Gas have rate recovery mechanisms for MGP related environmental costs,
therefore, changes in their respective environmental reserves do not impact Net Income. CL&P recovers a certain level of environmental costs
currently in rates. CL&P, NSTAR Electric and WMECO do not have a separate environmental cost recovery regulatory mechanism.
Long-Term Contractual Arrangements
B.
Estimated Future Annual Costs: The estimated future annual costs of significant long-term contractual arrangements as of December 31, 2015 are
as follows:
Eversource
(Millions of Dollars)
Supply and Stranded Cost
Renewable Energy
Peaker CfDs
Natural Gas Procurement
Coal, Wood and Other
Transmission Support Commitments
Total
CL&P
(Millions of Dollars)
Supply and Stranded Cost
Renewable Energy
Peaker CfDs
Transmission Support Commitments
Yankee Companies Billings
Total
NSTAR Electric
(Millions of Dollars)
Supply and Stranded Cost
Renewable Energy
Transmission Support Commitments
Yankee Companies Billings
Total
PSNH
(Millions of Dollars)
Supply and Stranded Cost
Renewable Energy
Coal, Wood and Other
Transmission Support Commitments
Yankee Companies Billings
Total
WMECO
(Millions of Dollars)
Renewable Energy
Transmission Support Commitments
Yankee Companies Billings
Total
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Thereafter
Total
177.4 $
246.6
55.8
137.9
45.4
21.4
684.5 $
110.1 $
273.3
41.1
123.8
23.3
19.0
590.6 $
81.5 $
238.3
20.4
78.4
3.4
20.3
442.3 $
51.1 $
237.4
7.8
57.8
1.9
20.2
376.2 $
34.9 $
237.0
4.0
46.9
1.9
20.2
344.9 $
80.6 $
2,174.7
3.6
99.7
13.1
-
2,371.7 $
535.6
3,407.3
132.7
544.5
89.0
101.1
4,810.2
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Thereafter
Total
145.0 $
70.1
55.8
8.4
0.1
279.4 $
87.2 $
71.7
41.1
7.5
0.4
207.9 $
58.2 $
72.1
20.4
8.0
0.8
159.5 $
38.0 $
72.3
7.8
8.0
0.8
126.9 $
29.3 $
72.4
4.0
8.0
0.8
114.5 $
47.6 $
649.7
3.6
-
10.7
711.6 $
405.3
1,008.3
132.7
39.9
13.6
1,599.8
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Thereafter
Total
14.1 $
99.0
6.6
0.1
119.8 $
4.8 $
117.0
5.9
0.2
127.9 $
5.5 $
80.4
6.3
0.3
92.5 $
5.5 $
78.5
6.2
0.3
90.5 $
3.1 $
76.6
6.2
0.3
86.2 $
28.1 $
489.8
-
3.6
521.5 $
61.1
941.3
31.2
4.8
1,038.4
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Thereafter
Total
18.3 $
67.9
45.4
4.6
0.1
136.3 $
18.1 $
69.0
23.3
4.0
0.2
114.6 $
17.8 $
70.1
3.4
4.3
0.3
95.9 $
7.6 $
70.7
1.9
4.3
0.3
84.8 $
2.5 $
72.0
1.9
4.3
0.3
81.0 $
4.9 $
860.4
13.1
-
4.2
882.6 $
69.2
1,210.1
89.0
21.5
5.4
1,395.2
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Thereafter
Total
9.6 $
1.8
-
11.4 $
15.6 $
1.6
0.1
17.3 $
15.7 $
1.7
0.2
17.6 $
15.9 $
1.7
0.2
17.8 $
16.0 $
1.7
0.2
17.9 $
174.8 $
-
2.7
177.5 $
247.6
8.5
3.4
259.5
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Supply and Stranded Cost: CL&P, NSTAR Electric and PSNH have various IPP contracts or purchase obligations for electricity, including payment
obligations resulting from the buydown of electricity purchase contracts. Such contracts extend through 2024 for CL&P, 2031 for NSTAR Electric
and 2023 for PSNH.
In addition, CL&P, along with UI, has four capacity CfDs for a total of approximately 787 MW of capacity consisting of three generation projects
and one demand response project. The capacity CfDs extend through 2026 and obligate both CL&P and UI to make or receive payments on a
monthly basis to or from the generation facilities based on the difference between a set contractual capacity price and the capacity market prices
received by the generation facilities in the ISO-NE capacity markets. CL&P has a sharing agreement with UI, whereby UI will share 20 percent of
the costs and benefits of these contracts. CL&P’s portion of the costs and benefits of these contracts will be paid by or refunded to CL&P’s
customers.
The contractual obligations table above does not include CL&P’s, NSTAR Electric’s or WMECO’s default service contracts, the amounts of which
vary with customers’ energy needs. The contractual obligations table also does not include PSNH’s short-term power supply management.
92
Renewable Energy: Renewable energy contracts include non-cancellable commitments under contracts of CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH, and
WMECO for the purchase of energy and capacity from renewable energy facilities. Such contracts extend through 2035 for CL&P, 2031 for NSTAR
Electric, 2033 for PSNH and 2031 for WMECO.
The contractual obligations table above does not include long-term commitments signed by CL&P, NSTAR Electric and WMECO, as required by the
PURA and DPU, for the purchase of renewable energy and related products that are contingent on the future construction of energy facilities.
Peaker CfDs: In 2008, CL&P entered into three CfDs with developers of peaking generation units approved by PURA (Peaker CfDs). These units
have a total of approximately 500 MW of peaking capacity. As directed by PURA, CL&P and UI have entered into a sharing agreement, whereby
CL&P is responsible for 80 percent and UI for 20 percent of the net costs or benefits of these CfDs. The Peaker CfDs pay the generation facility
owner the difference between capacity, forward reserve and energy market revenues and a cost-of-service payment stream for 30 years. The ultimate
cost or benefit to CL&P under these contracts will depend on the costs of plant operation and the prices that the projects receive for capacity and
other products in the ISO-NE markets. CL&P’s portion of the amounts paid or received under the Peaker CfDs will be recoverable from or refunded
to CL&P’s customers.
Natural Gas Procurement: In the normal course of business, Eversource’s natural gas distribution businesses have long-term contracts for the
purchase, transportation and storage of natural gas as part of its portfolio of supplies. These contracts extend through 2029.
Coal, Wood and Other: PSNH has entered into various arrangements for the purchase of coal, wood and the transportation services for fuel supply
for its electric generating assets. Also included in the contractual obligations table above is a contract for capacity on the Portland Natural Gas
Transmission System (PNGTS) pipeline that extends through 2018. The costs of this contract of $4.5 million are not recoverable from customers.
Transmission Support Commitments: Along with other New England utilities, CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO entered into
agreements in 1985 to support transmission and terminal facilities that were built to import electricity from the Hydro-Québec system in Canada.
CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO are obligated to pay, over a 30-year period ending in 2020, their proportionate shares of the annual
operation and maintenance expenses and capital costs of those facilities.
Yankee Companies Billings: CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO have decommissioning and plant closure cost obligations to the Yankee
Companies, which have each completed the physical decommissioning of their respective nuclear facilities and are now engaged in the long-term
storage of their spent fuel. For further information on the Yankee Companies, see Note 11C, “Commitments and Contingencies - Contractual
Obligations - Yankee Companies,” to the financial statements.
The total costs incurred under these agreements were as follows:
Eversource
(Millions of Dollars)
Supply and Stranded Cost
Renewable Energy
Peaker CfDs
Natural Gas Procurement
Coal, Wood and Other
Transmission Support Commitments
2015
$
For the Years Ended December 31,
2014
$
147.6
144.3
42.7
428.6
95.9
25.3
99.2
114.4
18.1
482.5
120.5
25.0
2013
$
141.0
91.3
51.9
349.8
112.6
24.9
(Millions of Dollars)
Supply and Stranded Cost $
Renewable Energy
Peaker CfDs
Coal, Wood and Other
Transmission Support
Commitments
2015
CL&P
NSTAR
Electric
For the Years Ended December 31,
2014
PSNH
WMECO
CL&P
NSTAR
Electric
PSNH
WMECO
CL&P
2013
NSTAR
Electric
PSNH
120.3 $
20.0
42.7
-
6.5 $
86.7
-
-
20.8 $
37.2
-
95.9
- $
0.4
-
-
63.0 $
0.7
18.1
-
7.0 $
87.4
-
-
26.0 $
26.3
-
120.5
3.2 $
-
-
-
77.6 $
-
51.9
-
32.4 $
84.9
-
-
WMECO
2.0
-
-
-
29.0 $
6.4
-
112.6
10.0
7.8
5.4
2.1
9.9
7.7
5.3
2.1
9.8
7.7
5.3
2.1
Contractual Obligations - Yankee Companies
C.
CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO have plant closure and fuel storage cost obligations to the Yankee Companies, which have each
completed the physical decommissioning of their respective nuclear facilities and are now engaged in the long-term storage of their spent fuel. The
Yankee Companies collect these costs through wholesale, FERC-approved rates charged under power purchase agreements with several New
England utilities, including CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO. These companies in turn recover these costs from their customers through
state regulatory commission-approved retail rates. The Yankee Companies have collected or are currently collecting amounts that management
believes are adequate to recover the remaining plant closure and fuel storage cost estimates for the respective plants. Management believes CL&P,
NSTAR Electric and WMECO will recover their shares of these obligations from their customers. PSNH has recovered its total share of these costs
from its customers.
CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO’s percentage share of the obligations to support the Yankee Companies under FERC-approved rate
tariffs is the same as their respective ownership percentages in the Yankee Companies. For further information on the ownership percentages, see
Note 1J, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Equity Method Investments,” to the financial statements.
93
Spent Nuclear Fuel Litigation:
DOE Phase I Damages – In 2013, CYAPC, YAEC and MYAPC received proceeds of $39.6 million, $38.3 million, and $81.7 million, respectively,
based on a final court judgment awarding damages for separate complaints filed by the Yankee Companies in 1998 against the DOE seeking
monetary damages resulting from the DOE’s failure to begin accepting spent nuclear fuel for disposal pursuant to the terms of the 1983 spent fuel
and high level waste disposal contracts between the Yankee Companies and the DOE (DOE Phase I Damages). Phase I covered damages for the
period 1998 through 2002. In 2013, CYAPC, YAEC and MYAPC reduced rates in their wholesale power contracts through the application of the
DOE proceeds for the benefit of customers. CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO began receiving the benefit of the Phase I DOE proceeds
in 2013, and the benefits are being passed on to customers.
In accordance with MYAPC’s three-year refund plan of the DOE Phase I Damages proceeds, in September 2014, MYAPC returned the second
portion of the proceeds to the member companies, including CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH, and WMECO, in the amount of $3.2 million, $1.1
million, $1.4 million and $0.8 million, respectively. On September 28, 2015, MYAPC returned the remaining DOE Phase I Damages proceeds to the
member companies, including CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH, and WMECO, in the amount of $2.3 million, $0.8 million, $1 million and $0.6
million, respectively. These amounts reduced receivables at CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO.
DOE Phase II Damages - In 2014, CYAPC, YAEC and MYAPC received proceeds of $126.3 million, $73.3 million and $35.8 million, respectively,
based on a final court judgment awarding damages for separate lawsuits filed by the Yankee Companies in 2007 against the DOE seeking recovery of
actual damages incurred related to the alleged failure of the DOE to provide for a permanent facility to store spent nuclear fuel generated in years
2001 through 2008 for CYAPC and YAEC, and from 2002 through 2008 for MYAPC (DOE Phase II Damages). The Yankee Companies returned
the DOE Phase II Damages proceeds to the member companies, including CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH, and WMECO, for the benefit of their
respective customers in June 2014.
As of December 31, 2014, CL&P’s refund obligation to customers of $65.4 million was recorded as an offset to the deferred storm restoration costs
regulatory asset, as directed by PURA. NSTAR Electric’s, PSNH’s and WMECO’s refund obligation to customers of $29.1 million, $13.1 million
and $18.1 million, respectively, was recorded as a regulatory liability in each company’s respective regulatory tracker mechanisms. Refunds to
customers for these Phase II DOE proceeds were completed in 2015.
DOE Phase III Damages – In August 2013, the Yankee Companies each filed subsequent lawsuits against the DOE seeking recovery of actual
damages incurred in the years 2009 through 2012. The DOE Phase III trial concluded on July 1, 2015, with a post-trial briefing that concluded on
October 14, 2015. The parties are awaiting a decision from the court.
Guarantees and Indemnifications
D.
In the normal course of business, Eversource parent provides credit assurances on behalf of its subsidiaries, including CL&P, NSTAR Electric,
PSNH and WMECO, in the form of guarantees.
Eversource parent issued a declining balance guaranty on behalf of a wholly-owned subsidiary to guarantee the payment of the subsidiary’s capital
contributions for its investment in the Access Northeast project. The guarantee will not exceed $206 million and will decrease as capital contributions
are made. The guaranty will expire upon the earlier of the full performance of the guaranteed obligations or December 31, 2021.
Eversource parent issued a guaranty on behalf of its subsidiary, NPT, under which, beginning at the time the Northern Pass Transmission line goes
into commercial operation, Eversource parent will guarantee the financial obligations of NPT under the TSA with HQ in an amount not to exceed
$25 million. Eversource parent’s obligations under the guaranty expire upon the full, final and indefeasible payment of the guaranteed obligations.
Eversource parent has also guaranteed certain indemnification and other obligations as a result of the sales of former unregulated subsidiaries and the
termination of an unregulated business, with maximum exposures either not specified or not material.
Management does not anticipate a material impact to Net Income as a result of these various guarantees and indemnifications.
The following table summarizes Eversource parent’s exposure to guarantees and indemnifications of its subsidiaries, including CL&P, NSTAR
Electric, PSNH and WMECO, and guarantees to external parties, as of December 31, 2015:
Company
Description
(in millions)
Expiration Dates
Maximum Exposure
On behalf of subsidiaries:
Various
Eversource Service and Rocky River Realty Company
Surety Bonds (1)
Lease Payments for Vehicles and Real Estate
$
$
32.7
11.4
2016 - 2018
2019 and 2024
On behalf of external parties:
Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC
(owner of Access Northeast assets)
Access Northeast project
capital contributions guarantee
$
204.8
2021
(1) Surety bond expiration dates reflect termination dates, the majority of which will be renewed or extended. Certain surety bonds contain credit
ratings triggers that would require Eversource parent to post collateral in the event that the unsecured debt credit ratings of Eversource are
downgraded.
94
FERC ROE Complaints
E.
Three separate complaints have been filed at FERC by combinations of New England state attorneys general, state regulatory commissions,
consumer advocates, consumer groups, municipal parties and other parties (the “Complainants”). In the first complaint, filed in 2011, the
Complainants alleged that the NETOs’ base ROE that had been utilized since 2006 was unjust and unreasonable, asserted that the rate was excessive
due to changes in the capital markets, and sought an order to reduce it prospectively from the date of the final FERC order and for the 15-month
period beginning October 1, 2011 to December 31, 2012. In the second and third complaints, filed in 2012 and 2014, the Complainants challenged
the NETOs’ base ROE and sought refunds for the respective 15-month periods beginning December 27, 2012 and July 31, 2014.
As a result of the actions taken by the FERC and other developments in the first complaint matter, the Company recorded additional reserves at its
electric subsidiaries in 2015 and 2014. In 2015, Eversource recognized a pre-tax charge to earnings (excluding interest) of $20 million, of which
$12.5 million was recorded at CL&P, $2.4 million at NSTAR Electric, $1 million at PSNH, and $4.1 million at WMECO. The pre-tax charge was
recorded as a regulatory liability and as a reduction to Operating Revenues. In 2014, the net aggregate pre-tax charge to earnings (excluding interest)
totaled $37 million, of which $20.7 million was recorded at CL&P, $7.9 million at NSTAR Electric, $2.8 million at PSNH and $5.6 million at
WMECO. In 2013, the net aggregate pre-tax charge to earnings (excluding interest) totaled $23.7 million, of which $12.8 million was recorded at
CL&P, $5.7 million at NSTAR Electric, $2.3 million at PSNH and $2.9 million at WMECO.
The second and third complaint proceedings are ongoing and a final FERC order is expected in late 2016 or early 2017. Although management is
uncertain on the final outcome of the second and third complaints regarding the ROE, management believes the current reserves established are
appropriate to reflect probable and reasonably estimable refunds.
NSTAR Electric and NSTAR Gas Comprehensive Settlement Agreement
F.
On March 2, 2015, the DPU approved the comprehensive settlement agreement between NSTAR Electric, NSTAR Gas and the Massachusetts
Attorney General (the “Settlement”) as filed with the DPU on December 31, 2014. The Settlement resolved the outstanding NSTAR Electric CPSL
program filings for 2006 through 2011, the NSTAR Electric and NSTAR Gas PAM and energy efficiency-related customer billing adjustments
reported in 2012, and the recovery of LBR related to NSTAR Electric’s energy efficiency programs for 2009 through 2011 (11 dockets in total). In
the first quarter of 2015, as a result of the DPU order, NSTAR Electric and NSTAR Gas commenced refunding a combined $44.7 million to
customers, which was recorded as a regulatory liability. Refunds to customers will continue through December 2016. As a result of the Settlement,
NSTAR Electric increased its operating revenues and decreased its amortization expense in 2015, resulting in the recognition of a $21.7 million pre-
tax benefit in 2015.
NSTAR Electric Basic Service Bad Debt Adder
G.
On January 7, 2015, the DPU issued an order concluding that NSTAR Electric had removed energy-related bad debt costs from base distribution
rates effective January 1, 2006. As a result of the DPU order, in the first quarter of 2015, NSTAR Electric increased its regulatory assets and reduced
its operations and maintenance expense by an under recovered amount of $24.2 million for energy-related bad debt costs through 2014, resulting in a
pre-tax benefit in 2015. NSTAR Electric filed for recovery of the energy-related bad debt costs regulatory asset from customers and on November
20, 2015the DPU approved NSTAR Electric’s proposed rate increase, to recover these costs over a 12-month period, effective January 1, 2016.
PSNH Generation Restructuring
H.
On June 10, 2015, Eversource and PSNH entered into the 2015 Public Service Company of New Hampshire Restructuring and Rate Stabilization
Agreement (the Agreement) with the New Hampshire Office of Energy and Planning, certain members of the NHPUC staff, the Office of Consumer
Advocate, two State Senators, and several other parties. The Agreement was filed with the NHPUC on the same day. Under the terms of the
Agreement, PSNH has agreed to divest its generation assets upon NHPUC approval. The Agreement is designed to provide a resolution of issues
pertaining to PSNH’s generation assets in pending regulatory proceedings before the NHPUC. The Agreement provided for the Clean Air Project
prudence proceeding to be resolved and all remaining Clean Air Project costs to be included in rates effective January 1, 2016. As part of the
Agreement, PSNH has agreed to forego recovery of $25 million of the deferred equity return related to the Clean Air Project. In addition, PSNH will
not seek a general distribution rate increase effective before July 1, 2017 and will contribute $5 million to create a clean energy fund, which will not
be recoverable from its customers. In 2015, PSNH recorded the $5 million contribution as a long-term liability and an increase to Operations and
Maintenance expense on the statements of income.
Upon completion of the divestiture process, all remaining stranded costs will be recovered via bonds that will be secured by a non-bypassable charge
or through other recoveries in rates billed to PSNH customers.
On January 26, 2016, Advisory Staff of the NHPUC and the parties to the Agreement filed a stipulation with the NHPUC agreeing that near-term
divestiture of PSNH’s generation was in the public interest and that the Agreement should be approved. Implementation of the Agreement is subject
to NHPUC approval, which is expected in early 2016.
If the NHPUC approves the settlements and the sale of the plants, then management expects to sell the plants in the first half of 2017. The sales price
of the generating assets could be less than the carrying value, but we believe that full recovery of PSNH’s generation assets is probable through a
combination of cash flows during the remaining operating period, sales proceeds upon divestiture, and recovery of stranded costs in future rates.
95
Litigation and Legal Proceedings
I.
Eversource, including CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO, are involved in legal, tax and regulatory proceedings regarding matters arising
in the ordinary course of business, which involve management’s assessment to determine the probability of whether a loss will occur and, if probable,
its best estimate of probable loss. The Company records and discloses losses when these losses are probable and reasonably estimable, and discloses
matters when losses are probable but not estimable or when losses are reasonably possible. Legal costs related to the defense of loss contingencies
are expensed as incurred.
12.
LEASES
Eversource, including CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO, has entered into lease agreements, some of which are capital leases, for the use
of data processing and office equipment, vehicles, service centers, and office space. In addition, CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO incur
costs associated with leases entered into by Eversource Service and Rocky River Realty Company, which are included below in their respective
operating lease rental expenses and future minimum rental payments. These intercompany lease amounts are eliminated on an Eversource
consolidated basis. The provisions of the Eversource, CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH, and WMECO lease agreements generally contain renewal
options. Certain lease agreements contain payments impacted by the commercial paper rate plus a credit spread or the consumer price index.
Operating lease rental payments charged to expense are as follows:
(Millions of Dollars)
2015
2014
2013
Eversource
CL&P
NSTAR
Electric
$
12.1 $
14.3
16.3
12.5 $
6.0
8.1
9.6 $
7.8
6.7
PSNH
WMECO
2.8 $
1.5
1.7
2.2
1.2
2.9
The 2015 rental payments above for CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH, and WMECO include an intercompany rate of return, property tax and
operational expense component paid to Rocky River Realty Company.
Future minimum rental payments, excluding executory costs, such as property taxes, state use taxes, insurance, and maintenance, under long-term
noncancelable leases, as of December 31, 2015 are as follows:
Operating Leases
(Millions of Dollars)
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Thereafter
Future minimum lease payments
Capital Leases
(Millions of Dollars)
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Thereafter
Future minimum lease payments
Less amount representing interest
Present value of future minimum lease payments
$
$
$
$
Eversource
CL&P
NSTAR
Electric
PSNH
WMECO
16.4 $
13.8
10.4
8.5
6.8
15.4
71.3 $
2.9 $
2.0
1.3
1.0
0.7
1.7
9.6 $
9.7 $
8.5
6.5
5.3
4.3
9.0
43.3 $
0.8 $
0.7
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.7
3.4 $
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
1.8
4.9
Eversource
CL&P
PSNH
2.2 $
2.1
2.1
2.0
2.0
1.4
11.8
3.6
8.2 $
1.9 $
1.9
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.4
11.2
3.6
7.6 $
0.3
0.2
0.1
-
-
-
0.6
-
0.6
CL&P entered into certain contracts for the purchase of energy that qualify as leases. These contracts do not have minimum lease payments and
therefore are not included in the tables above. However, such contracts have been included in the contractual obligations table in Note 11B,
“Commitments and Contingencies - Long-Term Contractual Arrangements,” to the financial statements.
96
13.
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each of the following financial instruments:
Preferred Stock and Long-Term Debt: The fair value of CL&P’s and NSTAR Electric’s preferred stock is based upon pricing models that
incorporate interest rates and other market factors, valuations or trades of similar securities and cash flow projections. The fair value of long-term
debt securities is based upon pricing models that incorporate quoted market prices for those issues or similar issues adjusted for market conditions,
credit ratings of the respective companies and treasury benchmark yields. The fair values provided in the tables below are classified as Level 2
within the fair value hierarchy. Carrying amounts and estimated fair values are as follows:
Eversource
(Millions of Dollars)
Preferred Stock Not Subject
to Mandatory Redemption
Long-Term Debt
(Millions of Dollars)
Preferred Stock Not Subject
to Mandatory Redemption
Long-Term Debt
(Millions of Dollars)
Preferred Stock Not Subject
to Mandatory Redemption
Long-Term Debt
As of December 31,
2015
2014
Carrying
Amount
Fair
Value
Carrying
Amount
Fair
Value
$
155.6 $
157.9 $
155.6 $
9,034.5
9,425.9
8,814.0
153.6
9,451.2
CL&P
NSTAR Electric
PSNH
WMECO
Carrying
Amount
Fair
Value
Carrying
Amount
Fair
Value
Carrying
Amount
Fair
Value
Carrying
Amount
Fair
Value
As of December 31, 2015
$
116.2 $
2,763.7
114.9 $
3,031.6
43.0 $
2,029.8
43.0 $
2,182.4
- $
1,071.0
- $
1,121.2
- $
517.3
-
551.8
CL&P
NSTAR Electric
PSNH
WMECO
Carrying
Amount
Fair
Value
Carrying
Amount
Fair
Value
Carrying
Amount
Fair
Value
Carrying
Amount
Fair
Value
As of December 31, 2014
$
116.2 $
2,826.2
112.0 $
3,214.5
43.0 $
1,786.2
41.6 $
1,993.5
- $
1,070.0
- $
1,137.9
- $
625.2
-
689.4
Effective December 31, 2015, the carrying amount of Long-Term Debt includes unamortized debt issuance costs presented as a direct reduction from
the carrying amount of the debt liability, in accordance with new accounting guidance. The December 31, 2014 carrying amount of Long-Term Debt
was retrospectively adjusted to conform to the current year presentation. See Note 1C, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Accounting
Standards,” for further information.
Derivative Instruments: Derivative instruments are carried at fair value. For further information, see Note 4, “Derivative Instruments,” to the
financial statements.
Other Financial Instruments: Investments in marketable securities are carried at fair value. For further information, see Note 5, “Marketable
Securities,” to the financial statements. The carrying value of other financial instruments included in current assets and current liabilities on the
balance sheets, including cash and cash equivalents and special deposits, approximates their fair value due to their short-term nature.
See Note 1H, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Fair Value Measurements,” for the fair value measurement policy and the fair value
hierarchy.
14.
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS)
The changes in accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) by component, net of tax effect, is as follows:
Eversource
(Millions of Dollars)
Balance as of January 1st
For the Year Ended December 31, 2015
For the Year Ended December 31, 2014
Unrealized
Gains/(Losses)
on Marketable
Securities
Defined
Benefit
Plans
Qualified
Cash Flow
Hedging
Instruments
Unrealized
Gains on
Marketable
Securities
Defined
Benefit
Plans
Total
Total
(12.4) $
0.7 $
(62.3) $
(74.0)
$
(14.4) $
0.4 $
(32.0) $
(46.0)
Qualified
Cash Flow
Hedging
Instruments
$
OCI Before Reclassifications
Amounts Reclassified from AOCI
Net OCI
Balance as of December 31st
$
-
2.1
2.1
(10.3) $
(2.6)
-
(2.6)
(1.9) $
3.5
4.2
7.7
(54.6) $
0.9
6.3
7.2
(66.8)
$
-
2.0
2.0
(12.4) $
0.3
-
0.3
0.7 $
(34.2)
3.9
(30.3)
(62.3) $
(33.9)
5.9
(28.0)
(74.0)
Eversource’s qualified cash flow hedging instruments represent interest rate swap agreements on debt issuances that were settled in prior years. The
settlement amount was recorded in AOCI and is being amortized into Net Income over the term of the underlying debt instrument. CL&P, PSNH
and WMECO continue to amortize interest rate swaps settled in prior years from AOCI into Interest Expense over the remaining life of the associated
long-term debt. Such interest rate swaps are not material to their respective financial statements.
97
The amortization expense of actuarial gains and losses and prior service cost on the defined benefit plans is amortized from AOCI into Operations
and Maintenance over the average future employee service period, and is reflected in amounts reclassified from AOCI.
Defined benefit plan OCI amounts before reclassifications relate to actuarial gains and losses that arose during the year and were recognized in
AOCI. The related tax effects recognized in AOCI during 2015 and 2013 were net deferred tax liabilities of $2 million in 2015 and $11.4 million in
2013, respectively, and net deferred tax assets of $22.3 million in 2014.
The following table sets forth the amounts reclassified from AOCI by component and the impacted line item on the statements of income:
Eversource
(Millions of Dollars)
Qualified Cash Flow Hedging Instruments
Tax Effect
Qualified Cash Flow Hedging Instruments, Net of Tax
Defined Benefit Plan Costs:
Amortization of Actuarial Losses
Amortization of Prior Service Cost
Total Defined Benefit Plan Costs
Tax Effect
Defined Benefit Plan Costs, Net of Tax
Total Amounts Reclassified from AOCI, Net of Tax
$
$
$
$
$
Amounts Reclassified from AOCI
For the Years Ended December 31,
2014
2013
2015
(3.5) $
1.4
(2.1) $
(6.6) $
(0.2)
(6.8)
2.6
(4.2) $
(6.3) $
(3.4) $
1.4
(2.0) $
(6.2) $
(0.2)
(6.4)
2.5
(3.9) $
(5.9) $
Statements of Income
Line Item Impacted
Interest Expense
Income Tax Expense
(3.4)
1.4
(2.0)
(10.5) Operations and Maintenance (1)
(0.2) Operations and Maintenance (1)
(10.7)
4.3
(6.4)
Income Tax Expense
(8.4)
(1)
These amounts are included in the computation of net periodic Pension, SERP and PBOP costs. See Note 9A, “Employee Benefits - Pension
Benefits and Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions,” for further information.
As of December 31, 2015, it was estimated that a pre-tax amount of $3.6 million (including $0.7 million for CL&P, $2 million for PSNH and $0.7
million for WMECO) will be reclassified from AOCI as a decrease to Net Income over the next 12 months as a result of the amortization of the
interest rate swap agreements which have been settled. In addition, it is estimated that a pre-tax amount of $6 million will be reclassified from AOCI
as a decrease to Net Income over the next 12 months as a result of the amortization of Pension, SERP and PBOP costs.
15.
DIVIDEND RESTRICTIONS
Eversource parent’s ability to pay dividends may be affected by certain state statutes, the ability of its subsidiaries to pay common dividends and the
leverage restriction tied to its consolidated total debt to total capitalization ratio requirement in its revolving credit agreement.
CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO are subject to Section 305 of the Federal Power Act that makes it unlawful for a public utility to make
or pay a dividend from any funds “properly included in its capital account.” Management believes that this Federal Power Act restriction, as applied
to CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO, would not be construed or applied by the FERC to prohibit the payment of dividends from retained
earnings for lawful and legitimate business purposes. In addition, certain state statutes may impose additional limitations on such companies and on
Yankee Gas and NSTAR Gas. Such state law restrictions do not restrict the payment of dividends from retained earnings or net income. Pursuant to
the joint revolving credit agreement of Eversource, CL&P, PSNH, WMECO, Yankee Gas and NSTAR Gas, and to the NSTAR Electric revolving
credit agreement, each company is required to maintain consolidated total debt to total capitalization ratio of no greater than 65 percent at the end of
each fiscal quarter. As of December 31, 2015, all companies were in compliance with such covenant. The Retained Earnings balances subject to
these restrictions were $2.8 billion for Eversource, $1.2 billion for CL&P, $1.6 billion for NSTAR Electric, $494.9 million for PSNH and $198.1
million for WMECO as of December 31, 2015. As of December 31, 2015, Eversource, CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH, WMECO, Yankee Gas and
NSTAR Gas were in compliance with all such provisions of the revolving credit agreements that may restrict the payment of dividends. PSNH is
further required to reserve an additional amount under its FERC hydroelectric license conditions. As of December 31, 2015, $13.4 million of
PSNH’s Retained Earnings was subject to restriction under its FERC hydroelectric license conditions and PSNH was in compliance with this
provision.
16.
COMMON SHARES
The following table sets forth the Eversource parent common shares and those of CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO that were authorized
and issued as well as the respective per share par values:
Per Share
Par Value
Authorized
as of December 31,
2015 and 2014
Eversource
CL&P
NSTAR Electric
PSNH
WMECO
$
$
$
$
$
5
10
1
1
25
380,000,000
24,500,000
100,000,000
100,000,000
1,072,471
Shares
2015
Issued
as of December 31,
333,862,615
6,035,205
100
301
434,653
2014
333,359,172
6,035,205
100
301
434,653
98
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, there were 16,671,366 and 16,375,835 Eversource common shares held as treasury shares, respectively. As of
December 31, 2015 and 2014, Eversource common shares outstanding were 317,191,249 and 316,983,337, respectively. In May 2015, the Company
repurchased 532,521 Eversource common shares at a share price of $47.94. Such shares are included in Treasury Stock on the consolidated balance
sheet at their weighted average original average cost of $26.02 per share.
17.
PREFERRED STOCK NOT SUBJECT TO MANDATORY REDEMPTION
The CL&P and NSTAR Electric preferred stock is not subject to mandatory redemption and is presented as a noncontrolling interest of a subsidiary
in Eversource’s financial statements.
CL&P is authorized to issue up to 9,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $50 per share, and NSTAR Electric is authorized to issue 2,890,000
shares of preferred stock, par value $100 per share. Holders of preferred stock of CL&P and NSTAR Electric are entitled to receive cumulative
dividends in preference to any payment of dividends on the common stock. Upon liquidation, holders of preferred stock of CL&P and NSTAR
Electric are entitled to receive a liquidation preference before any distribution to holders of common stock in an amount equal to the par value of the
preferred stock plus accrued and unpaid dividends. If the net assets were to be insufficient to pay the liquidation preference in full, then the net assets
would be distributed ratably to all holders of preferred stock. The preferred stock of CL&P and NSTAR Electric is subject to optional redemption by
the CL&P and NSTAR Electric Board of Directors at any time.
Details of preferred stock not subject to mandatory redemption are as follows (in millions except in redemption price and shares):
Series
CL&P
$
$
$
$
1.90 Series of 1947
2.00 Series of 1947
2.04 Series of 1949
2.20 Series of 1949
3.90 % Series of 1949
2.06 Series E of 1954
2.09 Series F of 1955
4.50 % Series of 1956
4.96 % Series of 1958
4.50 % Series of 1963
5.28 % Series of 1967
3.24 Series G of 1968
6.56 % Series of 1968
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Total CL&P
NSTAR Electric
4.25 % Series
4.78 % Series
Total NSTAR Electric
Fair Value Adjustment due to Merger with NSTAR
Total Eversource - Preferred Stock of Subsidiaries
$
$
Redemption Price
Per Share
Shares Outstanding as of
December 31, 2015 and 2014
As of December 31,
2015
2014
52.50
54.00
52.00
52.50
50.50
51.00
51.00
50.75
50.50
50.50
51.43
51.84
51.44
103.625
102.80
163,912
336,088
100,000
200,000
160,000
200,000
100,000
104,000
100,000
160,000
200,000
300,000
200,000
2,324,000
180,000
250,000
430,000
$
$
$
$
$
8.2 $
16.8
5.0
10.0
8.0
10.0
5.0
5.2
5.0
8.0
10.0
15.0
10.0
116.2 $
18.0 $
25.0
43.0 $
(3.6)
155.6 $
8.2
16.8
5.0
10.0
8.0
10.0
5.0
5.2
5.0
8.0
10.0
15.0
10.0
116.2
18.0
25.0
43.0
(3.6)
155.6
18.
COMMON SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS
Dividends on the preferred stock of CL&P and NSTAR Electric totaled $7.5 million, $7.5 million and $7.7 million for the years ended December 31,
2015, 2014 and 2013. These dividends were presented as Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests on the Eversource statements of
income. Noncontrolling Interest – Preferred Stock of Subsidiaries on the Eversource balance sheets totaled $155.6 million as of December 31, 2015
and 2014. Common Shareholders’ Equity was fully attributable to the parent and Noncontrolling Interest – Preferred Stock of Subsidiaries was fully
attributable to the noncontrolling interest on the Eversource balance sheets.
For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, there was no change in ownership of the common equity of CL&P and NSTAR Electric.
99
19.
EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic EPS is computed based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted EPS is computed on the
basis of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period plus the potential dilutive effect of certain share-based
compensation awards as if they were converted into common shares. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, there were 1,474,
3,643 and 1,575 antidilutive share awards excluded from the computation of diluted EPS, respectively.
The following table sets forth the components of basic and diluted EPS:
Eversource
(Millions of Dollars, except share information)
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding:
Basic
Dilutive Effect
Diluted
Basic EPS
Diluted EPS
$
$
$
2015
For the Years Ended December 31,
2014
2013
878.5 $
819.5 $
786.0
317,336,881
1,095,806
318,432,687
2.77 $
2.76 $
316,136,748
1,280,666
317,417,414
2.59 $
2.58 $
315,311,387
899,773
316,211,160
2.49
2.49
RSU and performance share awards are included in basic weighted average common shares outstanding as of the date that all necessary vesting
conditions have been satisfied. The dilutive effect of unvested RSU and performance share awards is calculated using the treasury stock method.
Assumed proceeds of these awards under the treasury stock method consist of the remaining compensation cost to be recognized and a theoretical tax
benefit. The theoretical tax benefit is calculated as the tax impact of the intrinsic value of the awards (the difference between the market value of the
average awards outstanding for the period, using the average market price during the period, and the grant date market value).
The dilutive effect of stock options to purchase common shares is also calculated using the treasury stock method. Assumed proceeds for stock
options consist of cash proceeds that would be received upon exercise, and a theoretical tax benefit. The theoretical tax benefit is calculated as the
tax impact of the intrinsic value of the stock options (the difference between the market value of the average stock options outstanding for the period,
using the average market price during the period, and the exercise price).
20.
SEGMENT INFORMATION
Presentation: Eversource is organized between the Electric Distribution, Electric Transmission and Natural Gas Distribution reportable segments
and Other based on a combination of factors, including the characteristics of each segments’ products and services, the sources of operating revenues
and expenses and the regulatory environment in which each segment operates. These reportable segments represent substantially all of Eversource’s
total consolidated revenues. Revenues from the sale of electricity and natural gas primarily are derived from residential, commercial and industrial
customers and are not dependent on any single customer. The Electric Distribution reportable segment includes the generation activities of PSNH
and WMECO.
The remainder of Eversource’s operations is presented as Other in the tables below and primarily consists of 1) the equity in earnings of Eversource
parent from its subsidiaries and intercompany interest income, both of which are eliminated in consolidation, and interest expense related to the debt
of Eversource parent, 2) the revenues and expenses of Eversource Service, most of which are eliminated in consolidation, 3) the operations of
CYAPC and YAEC, 4) the results of Eversource Gas Transmission LLC and 5) the results of other unregulated subsidiaries, which are not part of its
core business.
Cash flows used for investments in plant included in the segment information below are cash capital expenditures that do not include amounts
incurred but not paid, cost of removal, AFUDC related to equity funds, and the capitalized portions of pension expense.
Eversource’s reportable segments are determined based upon the level at which Eversource’s chief operating decision maker assesses performance
and makes decisions about the allocation of company resources. Each of Eversource’s subsidiaries, including CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and
WMECO, has one reportable segment. Eversource’s operating segments and reporting units are consistent with its reportable business segments.
100
Eversource’s segment information is as follows:
Eversource
(Millions of Dollars)
Operating Revenues
Depreciation and Amortization
Other Operating Expenses
Operating Income
Interest Expense
Interest Income
Other Income, Net
Income Tax (Expense)/Benefit
Net Income
Net Income Attributable
to Noncontrolling Interests
Net Income Attributable
to Common Shareholders
Total Assets (as of)
Cash Flows Used for
Investments in Plant
Eversource
(Millions of Dollars)
Operating Revenues
Depreciation and Amortization
Other Operating Expenses
Operating Income
Interest Expense
Interest Income
Other Income, Net
Income Tax (Expense)/Benefit
Net Income
Net Income Attributable
to Noncontrolling Interests
Net Income Attributable
to Common Shareholders
Total Assets (as of)
Cash Flows Used for
Investments in Plant
Eversource
(Millions of Dollars)
Operating Revenues
Depreciation and Amortization
Other Operating Expenses
Operating Income
Interest Expense
Interest Income
Other Income, Net
Income Tax (Expense)/Benefit
Net Income
Net Income Attributable
to Noncontrolling Interests
Net Income Attributable
to Common Shareholders
Cash Flows Used for
Investments in Plant
For the Year Ended December 31, 2015
Electric
Distribution
Natural Gas
Distribution
Electric
Transmission
Other
Eliminations
Total
5,903.6 $
(425.2)
(4,470.2)
1,008.2
(186.3)
5.7
7.2
(322.8)
512.0
995.5 $
(70.5)
(776.7)
148.3
(36.9)
0.1
0.8
(40.1)
72.2
1,069.1 $
(165.6)
(314.9)
588.6
(105.8)
1.6
14.5
(191.6)
307.3
863.6 $
(29.0)
(817.9)
16.7
(48.0)
4.4
977.8
14.5
965.4
(877.0) $
2.1
877.3
2.4
4.6
(5.1)
(972.8)
-
(970.9)
7,954.8
(688.2)
(5,502.4)
1,764.2
(372.4)
6.7
27.5
(540.0)
886.0
(4.7)
-
(2.8)
-
-
(7.5)
507.3 $
17,981.3 $
72.2 $
3,104.5 $
304.5 $
8,019.3 $
965.4 $
13,256.7 $
(970.9) $
(11,781.5) $
878.5
30,580.3
718.9 $
182.2 $
749.1 $
73.9 $
- $
1,724.1
Electric
Distribution
Natural Gas
Distribution
Electric
Transmission
Other
Eliminations
Total
For the Year Ended December 31, 2014
5,663.4 $
(384.6)
(4,366.2)
912.6
(191.6)
5.1
10.7
(269.7)
467.1
1,007.3 $
(68.1)
(786.7)
152.5
(34.0)
-
0.2
(46.4)
72.3
1,018.2 $
(150.5)
(302.1)
565.6
(104.1)
0.9
10.3
(174.5)
298.2
790.9 $
(42.1)
(748.0)
0.8
(36.6)
3.6
916.0
22.3
906.1
(737.9) $
19.9
719.3
1.3
4.2
(3.6)
(918.6)
-
(916.7)
7,741.9
(625.4)
(5,483.7)
1,632.8
(362.1)
6.0
18.6
(468.3)
827.0
(4.7)
-
(2.8)
-
-
(7.5)
462.4 $
17,536.9 $
72.3 $
3,029.3 $
295.4 $
7,615.6 $
906.1 $
12,664.9 $
(916.7) $
(11,106.3) $
819.5
29,740.4
645.2 $
176.7 $
731.6 $
50.2 $
- $
1,603.7
For the Year Ended December 31, 2013
Electric
Distribution
Natural Gas
Distribution
Electric
Transmission
Other
Eliminations
Total
5,362.3 $
(604.8)
(3,927.7)
829.8
(175.0)
4.1
12.9
(240.0)
431.8
855.8 $
(66.7)
(659.4)
129.7
(33.1)
-
0.8
(36.5)
60.9
978.7 $
(136.2)
(281.8)
560.7
(100.3)
0.7
10.9
(182.1)
289.9
777.5 $
(62.2)
(715.0)
0.3
(35.5)
5.4
858.9
31.9
861.0
(673.1) $
10.2
671.8
8.9
5.2
(5.6)
(858.2)
(0.2)
(849.9)
7,301.2
(859.7)
(4,912.1)
1,529.4
(338.7)
4.6
25.3
(426.9)
793.7
(4.8)
-
(2.9)
-
-
(7.7)
427.0 $
60.9 $
287.0 $
861.0 $
(849.9) $
786.0
639.0 $
168.1 $
618.5 $
31.2 $
- $
1,456.8
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
101
21.
GOODWILL
Eversource recorded approximately $3.2 billion of goodwill in connection with the 2012 merger with NSTAR and $0.3 billion of goodwill related to
the acquisition of the parent of Yankee Gas in 2000.
Goodwill is not subject to amortization, however is subject to a fair value based assessment for impairment at least annually and whenever facts or
circumstances indicate that there may be an impairment. A resulting write-down, if any, would be charged to Operating Expenses. Eversource’s
reporting units for the purpose of testing goodwill for impairment are Electric Distribution, Electric Transmission and Natural Gas Distribution.
These reporting units are consistent with the operating segments underlying the reportable segments identified in Note 20, “Segment Information,” to
the financial statements.
The annual goodwill assessment included an evaluation of the Company’s share price and credit ratings, analyst reports, financial performance, cost
and risk factors, long-term strategy, growth and future projections, as well as macroeconomic, industry and market conditions. Eversource completed
its annual goodwill impairment test for each of its reporting units as of October 1, 2015 and determined that no impairment existed. There were no
events subsequent to October 1, 2015 that indicated impairment of goodwill.
There were no changes to the goodwill balance or the allocation of goodwill as of December 31, 2015 or 2014. The following table presents
goodwill by reportable segment:
(Billions of Dollars)
Goodwill
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014
Electric
Distribution
Electric
Transmission
Natural Gas
Distribution
Total
$
2.5
$
0.6
$
0.4
$
3.5
22.
VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
The Company’s variable interests outside of the consolidated group are not material and consist of contracts that are required by regulation and
provide for regulatory recovery of contract costs and benefits through customer rates. Eversource, CL&P and NSTAR Electric hold variable interests
in variable interest entities (VIEs) through agreements with certain entities that own single renewable energy or peaking generation power plants and
with other independent power producers. Eversource, CL&P and NSTAR Electric do not control the activities that are economically significant to
these VIEs or provide financial or other support to these VIEs. Therefore, Eversource, CL&P and NSTAR Electric do not consolidate any power
plant VIEs.
23.
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
Eversource
(Millions of Dollars, except
per share information)
Operating Revenues
Operating Income
Net Income
Net Income Attributable
to Common Shareholders
$
Basic EPS (a)
$
Diluted EPS (a)
$
March 31,
June 30,
September 30, December 31,
March 31,
June 30,
2015
2014
Quarter Ended
2,513.4 $
497.5
255.1
1,817.1 $
412.0
209.4
1,933.1 $
469.2
237.8
1,691.2
385.5
183.7
253.3
0.80 $
0.80 $
207.5
0.65 $
0.65 $
235.9
0.74 $
0.74 $
181.8
0.57
0.57
$
$
$
2,290.6 $
467.7
237.8
1,677.6 $
294.0
129.2
September 30, December 31,
1,881.2
430.2
223.6
1,892.5 $
440.9
236.5
236.0
0.75 $
0.74 $
127.4
0.40 $
0.40 $
234.6
0.74 $
0.74 $
221.5
0.69
0.69
(a) The summation of quarterly EPS data may not equal annual data due to rounding.
(Millions of Dollars)
CL&P
Operating Revenues
Operating Income
Net Income
NSTAR Electric
Operating Revenues
Operating Income
Net Income
PSNH
Operating Revenues
Operating Income
Net Income
WMECO
Operating Revenues
Operating Income
Net Income
March 31,
June 30,
September 30, December 31,
March 31,
June 30,
September 30, December 31,
2015
2014
Quarter Ended
$
$
$
$
804.9 $
141.8
69.2
666.6 $
154.0
78.8
704.3 $
161.1
80.2
766.8 $
159.5
83.6
617.2 $
151.4
82.0
750.7 $
214.2
118.6
284.8 $
63.2
32.0
241.9 $
54.1
27.9
234.4 $
63.6
32.5
152.9 $
28.6
13.2
125.2 $
28.9
14.2
125.1 $
30.0
15.0
$
$
$
$
626.9
154.2
71.2
546.6
117.7
60.3
211.1
49.3
22.0
114.9
28.0
14.1
734.6 $
158.0
79.3
587.3 $
92.1
37.4
695.6 $
146.2
83.9
666.2 $
118.4
58.1
561.5 $
121.5
60.1
727.9 $
206.6
115.6
299.8 $
64.0
32.6
211.6 $
49.0
24.1
223.7 $
56.4
28.2
137.4 $
34.7
18.1
108.3 $
17.7
7.0
118.1 $
31.2
14.7
675.1
159.0
87.2
581.1
132.0
69.3
224.4
60.0
29.0
129.6
34.0
18.0
102
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
No events that would be described in response to this item have occurred with respect to Eversource, CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH or WMECO.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Management, on behalf of Eversource, CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO, is responsible for the preparation, integrity, and fair
presentation of the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements and other sections of this combined Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Eversource’s internal controls over financial reporting were audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP.
Management, on behalf of Eversource, CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate
internal controls over financial reporting. The internal control framework and processes have been designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. There are
inherent limitations of internal controls over financial reporting that could allow material misstatements due to error or fraud to occur and not be
prevented or detected on a timely basis by employees during the normal course of business. Additionally, internal controls over financial reporting
may become inadequate in the future due to changes in the business environment. Under the supervision and with the participation of the principal
executive officer and principal financial officer, an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting was conducted based
on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). Based on this evaluation under the framework in COSO, management concluded that internal controls over financial reporting
at Eversource, CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO were effective as of December 31, 2015.
Management, on behalf of Eversource, CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO, evaluated the design and operation of the disclosure controls
and procedures as of December 31, 2015 to determine whether they are effective in ensuring that the disclosure of required information is made
timely and in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules and regulations of the SEC. This evaluation was made under
management’s supervision and with management’s participation, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer as of the end
of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. There are inherent limitations of disclosure controls and procedures, including the
possibility of human error and the circumventing or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and
procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. The principal executive officer and principal financial officer
have concluded, based on their review, that the disclosure controls and procedures of Eversource, CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO are
effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (i) is recorded,
processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and regulations and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to
management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosures.
There have been no changes in internal controls over financial reporting for Eversource, CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO during the
quarter ended December 31, 2015 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, internal controls over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
No information is required to be disclosed under this item as of December 31, 2015, as this information has been previously disclosed in applicable
reports on Form 8-K during the fourth quarter of 2015.
103
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information in Item 10 is provided as of February 16, 2016, except where otherwise indicated.
Certain information required by this Item 10 is omitted for NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO pursuant to Instruction I(2)(c) to Form 10-K,
Omission of Information by Certain Wholly Owned Subsidiaries.
Eversource Energy
In addition to the information provided below concerning the executive officers of Eversource Energy, incorporated herein by reference is the
information to be contained in the sections captioned “Election of Trustees,” “Governance of Eversource Energy” and the related subsections,
“Selection of Trustees,” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” of Eversource Energy’s definitive proxy statement for
solicitation of proxies, expected to be filed with the SEC on or about March 24, 2016.
CL&P
The information required by this Item 10 for CL&P has been omitted from this report but is set forth in the Annual Report on Form 10-K
for 2015 filed with the SEC on a combined basis with Eversource Energy on February 26, 2016. Such report is also available in the Investors
section at www.eversource.com.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Eversource Energy
The information required by this Item 11 for Eversource Energy is incorporated herein by reference to certain information contained in Eversource
Energy’s definitive proxy statement for solicitation of proxies, which is expected to be filed with the SEC on or about March 24, 2016, under the
sections captioned “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” plus related subsections, and “Compensation Committee Report,” plus related
subsections following such Report.
NSTAR ELECTRIC, PSNH and WMECO
Certain information required by this Item 11 has been omitted for NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO pursuant to Instruction I(2)(c) to
Form 10-K, Omission of Information by Certain Wholly Owned Subsidiaries.
CL&P
The information required by this Item 11 for CL&P has been omitted from this report but is set forth in the Annual Report on Form 10-K
for 2015 filed with the SEC on a combined basis with Eversource Energy on February 26, 2016. Such report is also available in the Investors
section at www.eversource.com.
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Eversource Energy
In addition to the information below under “Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans,” incorporated herein by reference
is the information contained in the sections “Common Share Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners” and “Common Share Ownership of Trustees
and Management” of Eversource Energy’s definitive proxy statement for solicitation of proxies, expected to be filed with the SEC on or about
March 24, 2016.
NSTAR ELECTRIC, PSNH and WMECO
Certain information required by this Item 12 has been omitted for NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO pursuant to Instruction I(2)(c) to
Form 10-K, Omission of Information by Certain Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries.
CL&P
The information required by this Item 12 for CL&P has been omitted from this report but is set forth in the Annual Report on Form 10-K
for 2015 filed with the SEC on a combined basis with Eversource Energy on February 26, 2016. Such report is also available in the Investors
section at www.eversource.com.
104
SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
The following table sets forth the number of Eversource Energy common shares issuable under Eversource Energy equity compensation plans, as
well as their weighted exercise price, as of December 31, 2015, in accordance with the rules of the SEC:
Number of securities to be issued
upon exercise of outstanding
options, warrants and rights
(a)
Weighted-average exercise
price of outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(b)
Number of securities remaining
available for future issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities reflected in
column (a))
(c)
1,429,608
—
1,429,608
$26.47
—
$26.47
3,748,270
—
3,748,270
Plan Category
Equity compensation plans
approved by security holders
Equity compensation plans not
approved by security holders (d)
Total
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Includes 171,872 common shares to be issued upon exercise of options, 729,308 common shares for distribution of restricted share units, and
528,428 performance shares issuable at target, all pursuant to the terms of our Incentive Plan.
The weighted-average exercise price in Column (b) does not take into account restricted share units or performance shares, which have no
exercise price.
Includes 743,260 common shares issuable under our Employee Share Purchase Plan II.
All of our current compensation plans under which equity securities of Eversource Energy are authorized for issuance have been approved by
shareholders of Eversource Energy or the former shareholders of NSTAR.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Eversource Energy
Incorporated herein by reference is the information contained in the sections captioned “Trustee Independence” and “Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions” of Eversource Energy’s definitive proxy statement for solicitation of proxies, expected to be filed with the SEC on or about
March 24, 2016.
NSTAR ELECTRIC, PSNH and WMECO
Certain information required by this Item 13 has been omitted for NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO pursuant to Instruction I(2)(c) to
Form 10-K, Omission of Information by Certain Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries.
CL&P
The information required by this Item 13 for CL&P has been omitted from this report but is set forth in the Annual Report on Form 10-K
for 2015 filed with the SEC on a combined basis with Eversource Energy on February 26, 2016. Such report is also available in the Investors
section at www.eversource.com.
Item 14.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Eversource Energy
Incorporated herein by reference is the information contained in the section “Relationship with Independent Auditors” of Eversource Energy’s
definitive proxy statement for solicitation of proxies, expected to be filed with the SEC on or about March 24, 2016.
CL&P, NSTAR ELECTRIC, PSNH and WMECO
The information required by this Item 14 for CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO has been omitted from this report but is set
forth in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2015 filed with the SEC on a combined basis with Eversource Energy on February 26, 2016.
Such report is also available in the Investors section at www.eversource.com.
105
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a)
1.
Financial Statements:
The financial statements filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K are set forth under
Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
2.
Schedules
I.
Financial Information of Registrant:
Eversource Energy (Parent) Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2015 and 2014
Eversource Energy (Parent) Statements of Income for the Years Ended
December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
Eversource Energy (Parent) Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended
December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
Eversource Energy (Parent) Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
II.
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves for Eversource, CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH
and WMECO for 2015, 2014 and 2013
All other schedules of the companies for which inclusion is required in the applicable regulations
of the SEC are permitted to be omitted under the related instructions or are not applicable, and
therefore have been omitted.
3.
Exhibit Index
*
*
*
*
*
E-1
*
The schedules have been omitted from this report because they are not required. They are set forth in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for 2015 filed with the SEC on a combined basis with Eversource Energy on February 26, 2016. Such report is also
available in the Investors section at www.eversource.com.
106
EVERSOURCE ENERGY
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
February 26, 2016
EVERSOURCE ENERGY
By:
/s/
Jay S. Buth
Jay S. Buth
Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf
of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
POWER OF ATTORNEY
Each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Gregory B. Butler, James J. Judge and Jay S. Buth and each of
them, his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her
name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with
all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-
in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done,
as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and
agents or any of them, or their or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Signature
Title
/s/ Thomas J. May
Thomas J. May
/s/ James J. Judge
James J. Judge
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer, and a Trustee
(Principal Executive Officer)
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
/s/ Jay S. Buth
Jay S. Buth
Vice President, Controller
and Chief Accounting Officer
/s/ John S. Clarkeson
John S. Clarkeson
/s/ Cotton M. Cleveland
Cotton M. Cleveland
/s/ Sanford Cloud, Jr.
Sanford Cloud, Jr.
/s/ James S. DiStasio
James S. DiStasio
/s/ Francis A. Doyle
Francis A. Doyle
Trustee
Trustee
Trustee
Trustee
Trustee
Date
February 26, 2016
February 26, 2016
February 26, 2016
February 26, 2016
February 26, 2016
February 26, 2016
February 26, 2016
February 26, 2016
107
/s/ Charles K. Gifford
Charles K. Gifford
/s/ Paul A. La Camera
Paul A. La Camera
/s/ Kenneth R. Leibler
Kenneth R. Leibler
/s/ William C. Van Faasen
William C. Van Faasen
/s/ Frederica M. Williams
Frederica M. Williams
/s/ Dennis R. Wraase
Dennis R. Wraase
Trustee
Trustee
Trustee
Trustee
Trustee
Trustee
February 26, 2016
February 26, 2016
February 26, 2016
February 26, 2016
February 26, 2016
February 26, 2016
108
EXHIBIT INDEX
Each document described below is incorporated by reference by the registrant(s) listed to the files identified, unless designated with a (*), which
exhibits are filed herewith. Management contracts and compensation plans or arrangements are designated with a (+).
The portion of the Exhibit Index listing exhibits of CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO has been omitted from this report but is set
forth in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2015 filed with the SEC on a combined basis with Eversource Energy on February 26, 2016.
Such report is also available in the Investors section at www.eversource.com.
Exhibit
Number
Description
3.
Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws
3.1
Declaration of Trust of Eversource Energy, as amended through April 30, 2015 (Exhibit 3.1 Eversource Energy Current Report
on Form 8-K filed on April 30, 2015, File No. 001-05324)
4.
Instruments defining the rights of security holders, including indentures
(A) Eversource Energy
4.1
Indenture between Eversource Energy and The Bank of New York as Trustee dated as of April 1, 2002 (Exhibit A-3, Eversource
Energy 35-CERT filed April 16, 2002, File No. 070-09535)
4.1.1
4.1.2
Fifth Supplemental Indenture between Eversource Energy and The Bank of New York Trust Company N.A., as
Trustee, dated as of May 1, 2013, relating to $300 million of Senior Notes, Series E, due 2018 and $400 million of
Senior Notes, Series F, due 2023 (Exhibit 4.1, Eversource Energy Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 16, 2013,
File No. 001-05324)
Sixth Supplemental Indenture between Eversource Energy and The Bank of New York Trust Company N.A., as
Trustee, dated as of January 1, 2015, relating to $150 million of Senior Notes, Series G, due 2018 and $300 million of
Senior Notes, Series H, due 2025 (Exhibit 4.1, Eversource Energy Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 21, 2015,
File No. 001-05324)
4.2
Indenture dated as of January 12, 2000, between Eversource Energy, as successor to NSTAR LLC, as successor to NSTAR, and
Bank One Trust Company N.A. (Exhibit 4.1 to NSTAR Registration Statement on Form S-3, File No. 333-94735)
4.2.1
Form of 4.50% Debenture Due 2019 (Exhibit 99.2, NSTAR Form 8-K filed November 16, 2009, File No. 001-14768)
(F)
Eversource Energy, The Connecticut Light and Power Company, Public Service Company of New Hampshire and Western Massachusetts
Electric Company
*4.1
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated October 26, 2015, by and among Eversource Energy, CL&P, NSTAR Gas,
PSNH, WMECO, and Yankee Gas Services Company and the Banks named therein, pursuant to which Bank of America, N.A.
serves as Administrative Agent
10.
(A)
Material Contracts
Eversource Energy
10.1
10.2
Lease between The Rocky River Realty Company and Eversource Energy Service Company dated as of April 14, 1992 with
respect to the Berlin, Connecticut headquarters (Exhibit 10.29.1, 1992 Eversource Energy Form 10-K, File No. 001-05324)
Amended and Restated Indenture of Mortgage and Deed of Trust between Yankee Gas Services Company and the Bank of New
York Mellon Trust company, N.A. formerly Connecticut National Bank, as Trustee, dated July 1, 1989, (Composite including all
amendments effective January 1, 2014) (included as Exhibit B to the Eleventh Supplemental Indenture filed as Exhibit 10,
Eversource Energy Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2014 filed May 2, 2014, File No. 001-05324)
10.2.1
10.2.2
First Supplemental Indenture of Mortgage and Deed of Trust between Yankee Gas Services Company and The
Connecticut National Bank, as Trustee, dated April 1, 1992 (Yankee Energy System, Inc. Registration Statement on
Form S-3, dated October 2, 1992, File No. 33-52750
Seventh Supplemental Indenture of Mortgage and Deed of Trust between Yankee Gas Services Company and The
Bank of New York, as Successor Trustee to Fleet Bank (formerly The Connecticut National Bank) dated November 1,
2004 (Exhibit 10.5.7, 2004 Eversource Energy Form 10-K filed March 17, 2005, File No. 001-05324)
E-1
10.2.3
Eighth Supplemental Indenture of Mortgage and Deed of Trust between Yankee Gas Services Company and The Bank
of New York, as Successor Trustee to Fleet Bank (formerly the Connecticut National Bank) dated July 1, 2005 (Exhibit
10.5.8, Eversource Energy Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2005 filed August 8, 2005, File No. 001-05324)
10.2.4 Ninth Supplemental Indenture of Mortgage and Deed of Trust between Yankee Gas Services Company and The Bank
of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., successor as Trustee to The Bank of New York, as successor to Fleet
National Bank (formerly known as The Connecticut National Bank) dated as of October 1, 2008 (Exhibit 10-1,
Eversource Energy Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2008 filed November 10, 2008, File No. 001-
05324)
10.2.5
10.2.6
10.2.7
Tenth Supplemental Indenture of Mortgage and Deed of Trust between Yankee Gas Services Company and The Bank
of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., successor as Trustee to The Bank of New York, as successor to Fleet
National Bank (formerly known as The Connecticut National Bank), dated as of April 1, 2010 (Exhibit 10, Eversource
Energy Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2010 filed May 7, 2010, File No. 001-05324)
Eleventh Supplemental Indenture of Mortgage and Deed of Trust between Yankee Gas Services Company and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., successor as Trustee to The Bank of New York, as successor to Fleet
National Bank (formerly known as The Connecticut National Bank), dated as of January 1, 2014 (Exhibit 10,
Eversource Energy Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2014 filed May 2, 2014, File No. 001-05324)
Twelfth Supplemental Indenture of Mortgage and Deed of Trust between Yankee Gas Services Company and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., successor as Trustee to The Bank of New York, as successor to Fleet
National Bank (formerly known as The Connecticut National Bank), dated as of September 1, 2015 (Exhibit 10,
Eversource Energy Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2015 filed November 6, 2015, File No. 001-
05324)
*+10.3
Eversource Energy Board of Trustees’ Compensation Arrangement Summary
10.4
Composite Transmission Service Agreement, by and between Northern Pass Transmission LLC, as Owner and H.Q. Hydro
Renewable Energy, Inc., as Purchaser dated October 4, 2010 and effective February 14, 2014 (Exhibit 10.5, 1992 Eversource
Energy Form 10-K, File No. 001-05324)
*+10.5
Eversource Supplemental Executive Retirement Program effective as of January 1, 2015
*+10.6
Eversource Energy Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives effective as of January 1, 2014
(B)
Eversource Energy, The Connecticut Light and Power Company, Public Service Company of New Hampshire and Western Massachusetts
Electric Company
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4
+10.5
+10.6
Amended and Restated Form of Service Contract between each of Eversource Energy, CL&P and WMECO and Eversource
Energy Service Company dated as of January 1, 2014. (Exhibit 10.1, Eversource Energy Form 10-K filed on February 25, 2014,
File No. 001-05324)
Agreements among New England Utilities with respect to the Hydro-Quebec interconnection projects (Exhibits 10(u) and 10(v);
10(w), 10(x), and 10(y), 1990 and 1988, respectively, Form 10-K of New England Electric System, File No. 001-03446)
Transmission Operating Agreement between the Initial Participating Transmission Owners, Additional Participating
Transmission Owners and ISO New England, Inc. dated as of February 1, 2005 (Exhibit 10.29, 2004 Eversource Energy Form
10-K filed March 17, 2005, File No. 001-05324)
10.3.1 Rate Design and Funds Disbursement Agreement among the Initial Participating Transmission Owners, Additional
Participating Transmission Owners and ISO New England, Inc., effective June 30, 2006 (Exhibit 10.22.1, 2006
Eversource Energy Form 10-K filed March 1, 2007, File No. 001-05324)
Eversource Energy Service Company Transmission and Ancillary Service Wholesale Revenue Allocation Methodology among
The Connecticut Light and Power Company, Western Massachusetts Electric Company, Public Service Company of New
Hampshire, Holyoke Water Power Company and Holyoke Power and Electric Company Trustee dated as of January 1, 2008
(Exhibit 10.1, Eversource Energy Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2008 filed May 9, 2008, File No. 001-05324)
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with Gregory B. Butler, effective January 1, 2009 (Exhibit 10.7, 2008
Eversource Energy Form 10-K filed February 27, 2009, File No. 001-05324)
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with David R. McHale, effective January 1, 2009 (Exhibit 10.8, 2008
Eversource Energy Form 10-K filed February 27, 2009, File No. 001-05324)
E-2
+10.7
Amended and Restated Memorandum Agreement between Eversource Energy and Leon J. Olivier effective January 1, 2009
(Exhibit 10.9, 2008 Eversource Energy Form 10-K filed February 27, 2009, File No. 001-05324)
+10.8
Amended and Restated Incentive Plan Effective January 1, 2009 (Exhibit 10.3, Eversource Energy Form 10-Q for the Quarter
Ended September 30, 2008 filed November 10, 2008, File No. 001-05324)
+10.9
Trust under Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan dated May 2, 1994 (Exhibit 10.33, 2002 Eversource Energy Form 10-K
filed March 21, 2003, File No. 001-05324)
+10.9.1
First Amendment to Trust Under Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, effective as of December 10, 2002 (Exhibit
10 (B) 10.19.1, 2003 Eversource Energy Form 10-K filed March 12, 2004, File No. 001-05324)
+10.9.2
Second Amendment to Trust Under Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan , effective as of November 12, 2008
(Exhibit 10.12.2, 2008 Eversource Energy Form 10-K filed February 27, 2009, File No. 001-05324)
+10.10
Special Severance Program for Officers of Eversource Energy Companies as of January 1, 2009 (Exhibit 10.2 Eversource Energy
Form 10-Q for Quarter Ended September 30, 2008 filed November 10, 2008, File No. 001-05324)
10.11
Eversource Energy’s Third Amended and Restated Tax Allocation Agreement dated as of April 10, 2012, (Exhibit 10.1
Eversource Energy Form 10-Q for Quarter Ended June 30, 2012 filed August 7, 2012, File No. 001-05324)
(C)
Eversource Energy and The Connecticut Light and Power Company
10.1
CL&P Agreement Re: Connecticut NEEWS Projects by and between CL&P and The United Illuminating Company dated
July 14, 2010 (Exhibit 10, CL&P Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2010 filed August 6, 2010, File No. 000-00404)
(D)
Eversource Energy and NSTAR Electric Company
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4
10.5
10.6
10.7
10.8
10.9
10.10
10.11
NSTAR Electric Company Restructuring Settlement Agreement dated July 1997, (Exhibit 10.12, Boston Edison 1997
Form 10-K filed March 30, 1998, File No. 001-02301)
Amended and Restated Power Purchase Agreement (NEA A PPA), dated August 19, 2004, by and between Boston Edison and
Northeast Energy Associates L.P. (Exhibit 10.18, 2005 NSTAR Form 10-K filed February 21, 2006, File No. 001-14768)
Amended and Restated Power Purchase Agreement (NEA B PPA), dated August 19, 2004, by and between ComElectric and
Northeast Energy Associates L. P. (Exhibit 10.19, 2005 NSTAR Form 10-K filed February 21, 2006, File No. 001-14768)
Amended and Restated Power Purchase Agreement (CECO 1 PPA), dated August 19, 2004 by and between ComElectric and
Northeast Energy Associates L. P. (Exhibit 10.20, 2005 NSTAR Form 10-K filed February 21, 2006, File No. 001-14768)
Amended and Restated Power Purchase Agreement (CECO 2 PPA), dated August 19, 2004 by and between ComElectric and
Northeast Energy Associates L. P. (Exhibit 10.21, 2005 NSTAR Form 10-K filed February 21, 2006, File No. 001-14768)
The Bellingham Execution Agreement, dated August 19, 2004 between Boston Edison, ComElectric and Northeast Energy
Associates L. P. (Exhibit 10.22, 2005 NSTAR Form 10-K filed February 21, 2006, File No. 001-14768)
Second Restated NEPOOL Agreement among NSTAR Electric and various other electric utilities operating in New England,
dated August 16, 2004 (Exhibit 10.2.1.1, 2005 NSTAR Form 10-K filed February 21, 2006, File No. 001-14768)
Transmission Operating Agreement among NSTAR Electric and various electric transmission providers in New England and ISO
New England Inc., dated February 1, 2005 (Exhibit 10.2.1.2, 2005 NSTAR Form 10-K filed February 21, 2006, File No. 001-
14768)
Market Participants Service Agreement among NSTAR Electric and various other electric utilities operating in New England,
NEPOOL and ISO New England Inc., dated February 1, 2005 (Exhibit 10.2.1.3, 2005 NSTAR Form 10-K filed February 21,
2006, File No. 001-14768)
Rate Design and Funds Disbursement Agreement among NSTAR Electric and various other electric transmission providers in
New England, dated February 1, 2005 (Exhibit 10.2.1.4, 2005 NSTAR Form 10-K filed February 21, 2006, File No. 001-14768)
Participants Agreement among NSTAR Electric, various electric utilities operating in New England, NEPOOL and ISO-New
England, Inc., dated February 1, 2005 (Exhibit 10.2.1.4, 2006 NSTAR Form 10-K filed February 16, 2007, File No. 001-14768)
+10.12 NSTAR Excess Benefit Plan, effective August 25, 1999 (Exhibit 10.1 1999 NSTAR Form 10-K/A filed September 29, 2000,
File No. 001-14768)
E-3
+10.12.1 NSTAR Excess Benefit Plan, incorporating the NSTAR 409A Excess Benefit Plan, as amended and restated effective
January 1, 2008, dated December 24, 2008 (Exhibit 10.1.1 2008 NSTAR Form 10-K filed February 9, 2009, File No.
001-14768)
+10.13
Special Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement between Boston Edison Company and Thomas J. May dated March 13,
1999, regarding Key Executive Benefit Plan and Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (Exhibit 10.3, 1999 NSTAR
Form 10-K/A filed September 9, 2000, File No. 001-14768)
+10.14 Amended and Restated Change in Control Agreement by and between NSTAR and Thomas J. May dated November 15, 2007
(Exhibit 10.5, 2007 NSTAR Form 10-K filed February 11, 2008, File No. 001-14768)
+10.15 NSTAR 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan, effective May 3, 2007 (Exhibit 10.2, Eversource Energy Registration Statement on
Form S-8 filed on May 8, 2012)
+10.15.1 Deferred Common Share/Dividend Equivalent Award, Stock Option Grant, Option Certificate and Performance Share
Award/Dividend Equivalent Award Agreement Under the NSTAR 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan, by and between
NSTAR and Thomas J. May, dated January 24, 2008 (Exhibit 10.8.1, 2007 NSTAR Form 10-K filed February 11,
2008, File No. 001-14768)
+10.15.2 Deferred Common Share/Dividend Equivalent Award, Stock Option Grant, Option Certificate and Performance Share
Award/Dividend Equivalent Award Agreement Under the NSTAR 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan, by and between
NSTAR and James J. Judge, dated January 24, 2008 (Exhibit 10.8.2, 2007 NSTAR Form 10-K filed February 11, 2008,
File No. 001-14768)
+10.15.3 Deferred Common Share/Dividend Equivalent Award, Stock Option Grant, Option Certificate and Performance Share
Award/Dividend Equivalent Award Agreement Under the NSTAR 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan by and between
NSTAR and NSTAR’s other Senior Vice Presidents and Vice Presidents, dated January 24, 2008 (in form) (Exhibit
10.8.6, 2007 NSTAR Form 10-K filed February 11, 2008, File No. 001-14768)
+10.16 Amended and Restated Change in Control Agreement by and between James J. Judge and NSTAR, dated November 15, 2007
(Exhibit 10.9, 2007 NSTAR Form 10-K filed February 11, 2008, File No. 001-14768)
+10.17 Master Trust Agreement between NSTAR and State Street Bank and Trust Company (Rabbi Trust), effective August 25, 1999
(Exhibit 10.5, NSTAR Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2000 filed November 14, 2000, File No. 001-14768)
+10.18 Amended and Restated Change in Control Agreement by and between NSTAR’s other Senior Vice Presidents and NSTAR (in
form), dated November 15, 2007 (Exhibit 10.15, 2007 NSTAR Form 10-K filed February 11, 2008, File No. 001-14768)
+10.19 Amended and Restated Change in Control Agreement between NSTAR’s Vice Presidents and NSTAR (in form), dated
November 15, 2007 (Exhibit 10.16, 2007 NSTAR Form 10-K filed February 11, 2008, File No. 001-14768)
+10.20
Currently effective Change in Control Agreement between NSTAR’s Vice Presidents and NSTAR (in form) (Exhibit 10.17, 2009
NSTAR Form 10-K filed February 25, 2010, File No. 001-14768)
10.21 MDTE Order approving Rate Settlement Agreement dated December 31, 2005 (Exhibit 99.2, NSTAR Current Report on
Form 8-K filed January 4, 2006, File No. 001-14768)
(E)
Eversource Energy and Public Service Company of New Hampshire
10.1
2015 Public Service Company of New Hampshire Restructuring and Rate Stabilization Agreement, dated as of June 10, 2015, by
and among Eversource, PNSH, the Office of Energy and Planning, Designated Advocate Staff of the New Hampshire Public
Utilities Commission, the Office of Consumer Advocate, New Hampshire District 3 Senator Jeb Bradley, New Hampshire
District 15 Senator Dan Feltes, the City of Berlin, New Hampshire (subject to ratification by the Berlin City Council), Local No.
1837 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, the Conservation Law Foundation, the Retail Energy Supply
Association, TransCanada Power Marketing Ltd., TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc., New England Power Generators
Association, Inc., and the New Hampshire Sustainable Energy Association d/b/a NH CleanTech Council. (Exhibit 99.1, PSNH
Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 11, 2015, File No. 001-06392)
*10.1.1 Amendment to the 2015 Public Service Company of New Hampshire Restructuring and Rate Stabilization Agreement
dated January 26, 2016
(F)
Eversource Energy and Western Massachusetts Electric Company
10.1
Lease and Agreement by and between WMECO and Bank of New England, N.A., with BNE Realty Leasing Corporation of
North Carolina dated as of December 15, 1988 (Exhibit 10.63, 1988 Eversource Energy Form 10-K, File No. 001-05324)
E-4
*12.
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
*21.
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
*23.
Consents of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
*31.
Rule 13a – 14(a)/15 d – 14(a) Certifications
31
Certification of Thomas J. May, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Eversource Energy required by Rule 13a-
14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, dated February 26, 2016
31.1
Certification of James J. Judge, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Eversource Energy required by
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated February 26, 2016
*32
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certifications
32
Certification of Thomas J. May, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Eversource Energy and James J. Judge,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Eversource Energy, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated February 26, 2016
*101.INS
XBRL Instance Document
*101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
*101.CAL
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation
*101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition
*101.LAB
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels
*101.PRE
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation
E-5
Exhibit 31
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Thomas J. May, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Eversource Energy (the registrant);
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
2.
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
by this report;
3.
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
4.
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f)
and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
(a)
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c)
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most
(d)
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
(a)
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
(b)
control over financial reporting.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal
Date: February 26, 2016
/s/
Thomas J. May
Thomas J. May
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, James J. Judge, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Eversource Energy (the registrant);
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
2.
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
by this report;
3.
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
4.
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f)
and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
(a)
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
(b)
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c)
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most
(d)
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
(a)
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
(b)
control over financial reporting.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal
Date: February 26, 2016
/s/
James J. Judge
James J. Judge
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Exhibit 32
In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Eversource Energy (the registrant) for the period ending December 31, 2015 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Thomas J. May, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, and
James J. Judge, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2)
registrant.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
/s/
/s/
Thomas J. May
Thomas J. May
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
James J. Judge
James J. Judge
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Date: February 26, 2016
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the
registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY.]
[THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY.]
[THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY.]
[THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY.]
[THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY.]
Eversource Energy Trustees
Eversource Energy Executive Officers
Thomas J. May
Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer
James J. Judge
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
David R. McHale
Executive Vice President
and Chief Administrative Officer
Leon J. Olivier
Executive Vice President –
Enterprise Energy Strategy and Business
Development
Werner J. Schweiger
Executive Vice President
and Chief Operating Officer
Gregory B. Butler
Senior Vice President and General Counsel
Christine M. Carmody
Senior Vice President – Human Resources
Joseph R. Nolan, Jr.
Senior Vice President – Corporate Relations
Thomas J. May
Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer,
Eversource Energy
John S. Clarkeson
Chairman Emeritus,
The Boston Consulting Group, Inc.
Cotton M. Cleveland
President, Mather Associates
Sanford Cloud, Jr.*
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
The Cloud Company, LLC
James S. DiStasio
Retired Senior Vice Chairman
and Americas Chief Operating Officer,
Ernst & Young
Francis A. Doyle
President and Chief Executive Officer,
Connell Limited Partnership
Charles K. Gifford
Chairman Emeritus,
Bank of America Corporation
Paul A. La Camera
Administrator,
Public Radio for WBUR Boston
Kenneth R. Leibler
Founding Partner,
Boston Options Exchange
William C. Van Faasen
Chairman Emeritus,
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts Inc.
Frederica M. Williams
President and Chief Executive Officer,
Whittier Street Health Center
Dennis R. Wraase
Retired Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer,
Pepco Holdings, Inc.
*Lead Trustee
Closing Share Price
Dividends Paid/Share
Shareholder Information
$53.52
$51.07
$36.07
$39.08
$42.39
$1.57
$1.67
$1.47
$1.32
$1.10
Shareholders
As of December 31, 2015, there were 42,655 common
shareholders of record of Eversource Energy holding an
aggregate of 317,191,249 common shares.
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
TDD for hearing impaired: 1-800-952-9245
Transfer Agent and Registrar
Computershare Investor Services
P.O. Box 43078
Providence, RI 02940-3078
1-800-999-7269
Shareholder Account Access
We have partnered with Computershare to offer you
online access to your important shareowner
communications in a single secure place. You can
manage your account online via the Investor Center
website, Computershare’s web-based tool for
shareholders at, www.computershare.com/investor.
Through free around-the-clock access to the Investor
Center website, you can view your account, access forms
and request a variety of account transactions.
Investor Relations
You may contact our Investor Relations Department:
Jeffrey Kotkin:
Barbara Nieman:
John Gavin:
www.eversource.com/investors
860-665-5154
860-665-3249
781-441-8118
Dividend Reinvestment Plan
Eversource offers a dividend reinvestment plan. This plan
is sponsored by the company and not only offers the
reinvestment of dividends but provides both registered
shareholders and interested first-time investors an
affordable alternative for buying and selling Eversource
common shares. To request an enrollment package,
please call 1-800-999-7269 or log in to:
www.computershare.com/investor.
Total Shareholder Return
(Assumes $100 invested on December 31, 2010 with all dividends reinvested)
$200
$150
$100
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Eversource Energy
$100
EEI Index
$100
$117
$120
S&P 500
$100
$102
$131
$122
$118
$147
$138
$157
$192
$178
$178
$189
$171
$181
Direct Deposit for Quarterly Dividends
Direct deposit provides the convenience of automatic
and immediate access to your funds, while eliminating
the possibility of mail delays and lost, stolen or destroyed
checks. This service is free of charge to you. Please call
1-800-999-7269 to request an enrollment form.
Common Share Dividend Payment Dates
Last business day of March, June, September and
December.
Common Share Information
The common shares of Eversource Energy are listed on the
New York Stock Exchange. The ticker symbol is “ES.” The
high and low daily prices and dividends paid for the past
two years, by quarters, are shown in the table below.
Year
2015
2014
Quarter High
First
Second
Third
Fourth
$56.83
$51.42
$52.15
$52.85
First
Second
Third
Fourth
$45.69
$47.60
$47.37
$56.66
Low
$48.54
$45.20
$44.64
$48.18
$41.28
$44.28
$41.92
$44.37
Quarterly
Dividend
per Share
$0.4175
$0.4175
$0.4175
$0.4175
$0.3925
$0.3925
$0.3925
$0.3925
Corporate Governance
For information on Corporate Governance at Eversource,
go to our website, www.eversource.com, and select
“Investors” and then “Corporate Governance.”
2015
Annual Report
E
v
e
r
s
o
u
r
c
e
E
n
e
r
g
y
2
0
1
5
A
n
n
u
a
l
R
e
p
o
r
t
002CSN609F