Quarterlytics / Industrials / Industrial - Distribution / Finning International

Finning International

ftt · TSX Industrials
Claim this profile
Ticker ftt
Exchange TSX
Sector Industrials
Industry Industrial - Distribution
Employees 10,000+
← All annual reports
FY1998 Annual Report · Finning International
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
James F. Shepard
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Dear Shareholders, 

Customers, and Employees:

In 1998, after four years of continuous record revenues and profits,

Finning International Inc. received a resounding message.

The slowdown in Asia and decline in commodity prices was having

a significant impact on most of our markets, especially in the United

Kingdom and British Columbia. While the Company’s geographic diver-

sification allowed us to achieve increased revenue, our unsatisfactory

profitability showed that we needed to redefine the way we do business.

We needed to examine how we allocated capital within the Company

in areas such as inventory, rentals, real estate and technology. We

had to harness advances in information technology, transportation and

communications to build on our competitive advantage in each of the

markets we serve.

By combining our “best solutions” practices with this new way of

thinking, we had an opportunity to rebuild our Company from the ground

up – based on flexibility and speed – to compete in the next millennium.

So we have embarked on a process of rebuilding the Company.

Decisions are now being made that are changing the shape of our oper-

ations. From a reduced cost base, our dealer network is now focusing

not only on the traditional business segment but is also pursuing new

emerging segments of the industry.

To better serve our traditional customers who own and operate

their equipment, we have committed to raising our customer support

service levels. We will achieve this through improved logistics and the

application of information technology. By taking advantage of our global

connections and our Dealer Business System (DBS) that links us from

the factory floor to the branch shop, Finning will improve service and

delivery with a high-tech, high-touch approach.

Finning International Inc.
555 Great Northern Way, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, V5T 1E2

F I N N I N G  I N T E R N A T I O N A L  I N C .

2

James F. Shepard
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

In addition, we will enhance our “best solutions” approach for

customers who currently own and operate equipment, but whose core

competency lies elsewhere. This will allow Finning to ensure optimal

performance of Caterpillar equipment for these customers by applying

our Company’s knowledge of equipment operation and maintenance.

The depth of human talent at Finning boasts an expertise in equipment

solutions that has few peers. We are focused on intimately understanding

our customers’ businesses and on providing the best solutions to lower

unit operating costs – be it the production or transportation of ore, timber,

grain, oil, gravel or goods.

Our Company is undergoing a renewal that combines the vitality of

“start-up” thinking with the culture of proven profitability performance.

We will combine the best people, the best equipment and the best tech-

nologies to sustain our competitive advantage in the marketplace.

Underpinning this “start-up” approach is a population of thousands

of Caterpillar machines throughout our territories that will require

parts and service support for years to come. The growth opportunities

that will be afforded by Caterpillar’s imaginative product expansion will

open new markets in the future. Augmenting this growing market oppor-

tunity is the strong capital base we have as a publicly traded company,

and a record of growth and uninterrupted profitability.

In 1998, our Company achieved substantial successes despite diffi-

cult market conditions in our territories. In Western Canada, we generated

a significant increase in market share based on the growing line-up of

quality equipment from Caterpillar. In Chile, we completed an organiza-

tional restructuring that has brought new, high-calibre talent into the

operation. And in the U.K., we completed the merger of H. Leverton

Limited into Finning (UK) Ltd., forming a national Caterpillar dealership

in Britain. In addition, we installed the most recent version of DBS, a

dealer-designed information system that is Year 2000 compliant, through-

out all our operations.

F I N N I N G  I N T E R N A T I O N A L  I N C .

4

James F. Shepard
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

As  we  move  forward,  there  will  be  exciting  opportunities  for

employees to grasp new ideas and implement them for the benefit of

our customers. At Finning, we want our employees to grow through self-

renewal and to be part of a learning organization that allows them to

realize their potential.

I am pleased to welcome Doug Whitehead to the Company. Mr.

Whitehead brings a proven record of senior management achieved

through an outstanding career in retail marketing and forestry. His

appointment as President and Chief Operating Officer adds more depth

to the strong management team of Finning International Inc.

Additionally, the Board appointed Andrew Simon of London, England

as a Director, effective January 1999, and Ricardo Bacarreza of Santiago,

Chile as a Director, effective February 1999. These Board appointments are

a reflection of the substantial growth of our operations outside Canada.

The Board thanks Rolf Hougen of Whitehorse, Yukon for his excellent

service as a Director of the Company for the past 19 years. 

I would like to thank Bill Merrell and Dave Edwards, both of whom

retired after making unique and outstanding contributions to Finning

over the course of their careers.

On behalf of the Board of Directors, I wish to thank our employees

for their committed effort in what has been a very challenging year.

Looking to the future, I see our Company taking advantage of the

unrealized opportunities that will come with the next millennium. With

vision, courage and commitment, Finning will continue to deliver prof-

itability and growth for its shareholders.

Sincerely,

J a m e s  F.  S h e p a r d  
C H A I R M A N  A N D  C H I E F  E X E C U T I V E  O F F I C E R

F I N N I N G  I N T E R N A T I O N A L  I N C .

6

C O R P O R A T E  
P R O F I L E

Finning International Inc. is one of

Caterpillar’s largest dealers world-

wide, serving markets in Western

Canada, the U.K. and Chile. Our busi-

ness is to consistently provide the

best solutions to people who move,

harvest or transform goods and mate-

rials so they can meet the needs of

their customers.

We are rebuilding our organization

so it has the vitality, flexibility and

speed to compete in the next millen-

nium. We’re focused on becoming a

leading solutions provider through

unmatched excellence in customer

support services.

Finning’s employees and manage-

ment are committed to making both

our customers and our Company suc-

cessful. And to delivering improved

returns to our shareholders from a

more efficient operating base.

At Finning, we’ve created a climate

in which our people have the compe-

tence  and  freedom  to  deliver  the

best solutions to our customers.

We can only do this successfully if

we listen closely to the needs of our

customers, drawing on our years of

product and industry knowledge.

Once we have an intimate under-

standing of a customer’s problem, the

Finning team can deliver solutions

that will increase productivity and

lower operating costs – key goals of

our customers. We support and ser-

vice the best equipment in its class,

namely Caterpillar.

F I N N I N G  I N T E R N A T I O N A L  I N C .

8

[1]
WE LISTEN

In  becoming  a  leading  solutions

provider to industry, we must excel

at customer service throughout our

business.

We work closely with our large and

small customers to ensure the opti-

mal performance of their equipment

on  the  worksite  –  whether  it’s  for

part-time  operation  or  24  hours  a

day, 365 days a year.

With more than 36,000 Caterpillar

machines currently operating in our

three dealer territories, we have exten-

sive knowledge in the maintenance

and repair of Cat equipment.

The Finning team is there to serve –

wherever our customers may be.

F I N N I N G  I N T E R N A T I O N A L  I N C .

1 0

[2]
WE SUPPORT

With a growing, innovative Caterpillar

product line, it’s essential that our

people receive the training and edu-

cation needed to provide the best

solutions for our customers.

Educating our workforce is a con-

stant process at Finning and one that

occurs daily – in the shop, in the class-

room and on the job.

Given the size and strength of the

Company, training can be focused by

industry and by product application.

Having developed expertise in spe-

cific areas, we’re eager to share that

knowledge base with our customers.

We want all of our employees to be

part of a learning organization – one

that uses information technology to

improve customer service, product

knowledge and communication.

F I N N I N G  I N T E R N A T I O N A L  I N C .

1 2

[3]
WE TRAIN

To maintain our competitiveness in

technology, Finning is investing in the

latest computer hardware and soft-

ware, diagnostic equipment, mobile

trucks and information systems.

By taking advantage of our global

connections  and  Dealer  Business

System (DBS), we’re linked from the

factory floor to the branch shop and

can connect with other Cat dealers

around the world. This allows us to

improve our service and delivery with

a high-tech, high-touch approach.

We also see information technology

as a means by which to share more

information with our customers, faster

and more conveniently – enabling us

to be more responsive to their needs.

F I N N I N G  I N T E R N A T I O N A L  I N C .

1 4

[4]
WE UPGRADE

More of our customers are focusing

on their own core competencies and

seeking equipment solutions exter-

nally that can improve their produc-

tivity. This has created a business

opportunity for Finning, where cus-

tomers are now asking us to do the

work for them.

And with our expert knowledge of

operating and maintaining Caterpillar

equipment, we can serve this emerg-

ing market profitably while assuming

some of the risk of doing this work.

We’re also pursuing new channels

of distribution, using e-commerce to

redistribute used equipment and used

parts to sophisticated buyers world-

wide. As the adoption of the internet

increases rapidly into the next millen-

nium, we’ll be prepared to meet the

changing demands of our customers.

F I N N I N G  I N T E R N A T I O N A L  I N C .

1 6

[5]
WE PURSUE 
NEW MARKETS

F I N N I N G  ( C A N A D A )

[A DIVISION OF FINNING INTERNATIONAL INC.] 

Servicing Western Canada with dealer
territories in British Columbia, Alberta,
Yukon and the Northwest Territories

F I N N I N G  ( U K )  LT D .

[100% – OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF 
FINNING INTERNATIONAL INC.]

Servicing Britain with dealer territories 
in England, Scotland and Wales

F I N N I N G  C H I L E  S . A .

[100% – OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF 
FINNING INTERNATIONAL INC.]

Servicing the northern, central and 
southern regions of Chile

U N I V E R S A L  M A C H I N E R Y  S E R V I C E S

[A DIVISION OF FINNING INTERNATIONAL INC.]

Selling used equipment and used parts
internationally

F I N N I N G  
I N T E R N A T I O N A L   I N C .

F I N N I N G  I N T E R N A T I O N A L  I N C .

1 8

M A N A G E M E N T ’ S   D I S C U S S I O N  
A N D   A N A L Y S I S

R E V I E W   O F  
O P E R A T I O N S

Lower Asian demand for forest products

H I G H L I G H T S   Consolidated revenue increased

resulted in significantly lower activity levels

11% to $2.6 billion in 1998 compared with

in the forest industry in British Columbia; and

$2.3 billion the previous year. In both Canada

Depressed copper prices caused a slow-

and Chile, revenue was flat on a year-over-year

down in mine expansions and new mining

basis. In the United Kingdom, revenue was up

projects in Chile.

40% to $793 million, reflecting an additional

In response to these conditions, Finning

nine months contribution from H. Leverton

launched a major restructuring program in

Limited in 1998. Revenue in Universal Machin-

1998 to reduce its cost base throughout its

ery Services (UMS) was also up during the

operations. The program included closing

year, increasing 50% to $152 million.

five  branches  and  downsizing  five  other

Total equipment revenue, which includes

locations  in  British  Columbia  as  well  as

new and used equipment sales and rentals,

implementing an early retirement program

increased 15% to $1.8 billion in 1998. Cus-

for employees in Finning (Canada). In the

tomer service revenue increased 5% to $783

U.K., one branch and one depot were closed

million.  The  Company’s  net  income  was

in  1998  as  the  dealership  continued  its

$3.2 million compared with $103.7 million

efforts  to  resize  the  scale  of  its  national

the previous year. Excluding non-recurring

dealership. In addition, the Company com-

charges of $15.5 million in 1998 and non-

pleted several major steps towards its reor-

recurring gains of $13.2 million in the prior

ganization, including: (1) the integration of

year, net income declined to $18.6 million

H. Leverton into its Finning (UK) Ltd. opera-

from $90.5 million in 1997.

tion; (2) the relocation of Finning (Canada)’s

While Finning International Inc. achieved

head office to Edmonton; and (3) the reor-

record revenue in 1998, the Company faced

ganization of management in all three of its

difficult market conditions in many of its

dealer operations.

dealer territories. These conditions can be

summarized as follows:

A slowdown in the U.K. economy and a

strong British pound had a negative effect

on both new and used domestic equipment

in that market;

R E V E N U E   B Y   A C T I V I T Y  

( $  M I L L I O N S )

New equipment
Used equipment
Equipment rental
Customer support services
Finance and other

$

1,187
442
134
783
39

1 9 9 8

46% $
17%
5%
30%
2%

1,115
309
104
744
55

1 9 9 7

48%
13%
5%
32%
2%

$

2,585

100% $

2,327

100%

G R O W T H

6%
43%
28%
5%
(29)%

11%

1 9

REVENUE BY
GEOGRAPHIC
SEGMENT (%)

United Kingdom
31
Alberta/Northwest Territories 27
19
Chile
17
British Columbia/Yukon
6
International

CONSOLIDATED
REVENUE
(BY ACTIVITY) (%)

New equipment
Customer service
Used equipment
Equipment rental
Finance

46
30
17
5
2

R E V E N U E Total revenue was $2.6 billion com-

C U S T O M E R   S U P P O R T   S E R V I C E S Total parts and

pared with $2.3 billion last year, an increase

customer service revenue was $783 million,

of 11%. All activity levels increased, except

a 5% increase compared with the prior year.

finance revenue which declined 29% due to

Revenue increased in all dealer territories

the  sale  of  the  U.K.  finance  portfolio  to

with the exception of Canada, where rev-

Caterpillar Financial Services (UK) Limited

enue declined by 7% from prior year levels

in November of 1997. Of the 11% increase in

due to lower parts and service sales in B.C.

total revenue, 6% was related to the apprecia-

The improvement in the U.K. reflected the

tion of the British pound and the U.S. dollar

additional contribution from H. Leverton,

relative to the Canadian dollar. Price increas-

while the increase in Chile was due to higher

es on new equipment and customer support

parts revenue from an increased population

services, both averaging 2% across opera-

of Caterpillar equipment. Parts revenue in

tions, increased revenue by 1%. The balance

UMS grew 67% to $11 million in 1998.

of the increase in total revenue was attribut-

able to increased activity due to the acquisi-

tion of H. Leverton in 1997.

F I N A N C E   R E V E N U E Finance revenue declined

to $39.1 million in 1998, a decrease of 29%

compared with the prior year. This decrease

E Q U I P M E N T   R E V E N U E Equipment 

revenue

was due to the sale of the U.K. finance port-

totalled $1.8 billion compared with $1.5 bil-

folio in November 1997, resulting in a reduc-

lion in the prior year, an increase of 15%.

tion  in  finance  revenue  of  $14  million  in

Sales of new equipment were up 6% to $1.2

1998. Finance revenue in Finning (Canada)

billion in 1998 as weaker sales in both Cana-

remained flat from the prior year. Finning

da and Chile were offset by higher sales in the

and Caterpillar Finance have arrangements

U.K. The increase in the U.K. was entirely a

in place to provide customers with competi-

result of the acquisition of H. Leverton, pur-

tive financial services in each of Finning’s

chased by Finning (UK) on October 1, 1997.

dealer territories.

Used  equipment  sales  increased  43%  to

Total finance assets declined 19% to $418

$442 million as all operations focused on

million at the end of 1998. A 1% increase in

reducing aged used equipment inventories at

leased equipment was offset by a 51% reduc-

lower than normal margins. Rental revenue

tion in instalment notes receivable. The decline

increased 28% to $134 million as total rental

in finance assets was due to the sale of a

fleet  assets  grew  20%  during  the  year.

portion of the Canadian finance portfolio to

Rental revenue was higher in all operations

Caterpillar Financial Services Ltd. during

with the exception of Chile which experi-

the year. Finning (Canada) and Caterpillar

enced a marginal decline in rental activity.

Financial Services Ltd. are parties to a joint

marketing agreement in which personnel

from both Finning (Canada) and Caterpillar

Finance market a common array of financial

services to customers in the Canadian dealer

territory, including leasing, rental-purchase

financing, conditional sales, and equity

financing.

F I N N I N G  I N T E R N A T I O N A L  I N C .

2 0

C O N S O L I D A T E D   R E V E N U E / N E T   I N C O M E / E A R N I N G S   P E R   S H A R E

( $  T H O U S A N D S )

Revenue 

Net income
Non-recurring items

Adjusted net income

1 9 9 8

1 9 9 7

$ 2,585,421

$ 2,327,064

$

$

3,185
15,461

18,646

$

$

0.04
0.19

$ 103,695
(13,190)

0.23

$

90,505

$

$

1.32
(0.17)

1.15

N E T   I N C O M E Net income was $3.2 million com-

in 1997. Net income in 1998 included $0.9

pared with $103.7 million in 1997. Excluding

million in severance costs provided for in the

non-recurring charges of $15.5 million in 1998

third quarter.

and non-recurring gains of $13.2 million in

Selling,  general  and  administrative

1997, net income in 1998 declined to $18.6

expenses increased to $498 million, 27% high-

million from $90.5 million in the prior year.

er than 1997. Excluding the non-recurring

Earnings per share were lower at $0.04

items  noted  above  that  were  included  in

compared with $1.32 for 1997. Non-recurring

selling, general and administrative expenses,

charges in 1998 were $0.19 per share, while

costs increased $70.7 million or 17% from

non-recurring  gains  in  the  previous  year

the  prior  year.  The  majority  of  the  cost

were $0.17 per share. Adjusting for these non-

increase was in the U.K. and reflected the

recurring  items,  earnings  per  share  were

full effect of the integration of Finning (UK)

$0.23 in 1998 compared with $1.15 in 1997.

and H. Leverton.

Net income also included $27.1 million

Finance  costs  and  interest  on  other

after-tax  charges  on  aged  inventories  in

indebtedness increased to $75.2 million, up

Finning’s four operating units: $13.6 million

12% from the prior year. The majority of the

in  the  first  quarter  ($0.17  per  share)  and

increase was in Canadian operations, due to

$13.5 million in the fourth quarter ($0.17

higher average inventory levels and interest

per share).

rates compared with 1997 levels.

Canadian operations contributed $34.7

For 1999, the Company is expecting mar-

million to consolidated net income, a decrease

ket conditions to be even tougher than in

of 44% from 1997. Excluding a non-recurring

1998 as many commodity prices are hitting

charge of $8.2 million in 1998 and a non-

10 to 15 year lows and the U.K. economy is

recurring gain of $10.0 million in 1997, net

unlikely to turn around quickly during the

income in Finning (Canada) was $42.9 mil-

next year. Finning expects activity levels in

lion, down 17% from the prior year. The U.K.

Western Canada to decline in 1999, primarily

operations had a loss of $32.2 million com-

as the result of a slowdown in the Alberta

pared with income of $20.1 million last year.

economy. In Chile, without large deliveries of

Excluding a non-recurring charge of $6.4

equipment to new projects or mine expan-

million in 1998 and a non-recurring gain of

sions, it is anticipated activity levels in that

$3.2 million in 1997, the net loss in Finning

market will be down year-over-year. Despite

(UK) was $25.8 million compared with net

these conditions, the Company’s cost reduc-

income of $16.9 million in the prior year. Net

tion and asset management programs are

income from Chilean operations was $3.4

expected to improve its returns in 1999.

million in 1998 compared with $19.5 million

2 1

C A N A D I A N  
O P E R A T I O N S

F I N A N C I A L   R E V I E W

H I G H L I G H T S In Finning (Canada), 1998 was a

R E V E N U E   B Y   P R O V I N C E Revenue  in  British

year of consolidation. After achieving record

Columbia and Yukon declined by 17% in 1998,

levels  for  both  revenue  and  units  sold  in

down in all categories except used equip-

1997, overall revenues in 1998 declined by

ment sales, which were up 28%. The decline

1%. New equipment unit deliveries declined

in revenue was directly attributable to the

by 12% as the company noted a significant

depressed forest and mining industries in

shift in the mix and size of units from small-

British Columbia. Revenue in Alberta and the

er forestry and oilfield units to larger min-

Northwest Territories, however, increased

ing and construction units.

by 13% due to large unit deliveries to com-

During 1998, Finning (Canada) implement-

panies operating in the oil sands and to the

ed significant changes in its Western Cana-

Ekati diamond mine in the Northwest Terri-

dian operations. Senior management and

tories. New equipment sales and equipment

head office staff were relocated to Edmonton

rentals  were  up  significantly  while  used

from the Company’s location on Great North-

equipment sales declined slightly. Customer

ern Way in Vancouver. In British Columbia,

service revenues were up moderately as the

reduced  activity  levels  in  the  forest  and

overall increase in oil sands and diamond

mining industries led to the closure of five

mining were partially offset by lower oil and

Finning branches and the downsizing of five

gas drilling activity.

others in the fourth quarter of 1998. During

the year, however, Finning (Canada) opened

a  new  branch  facility  in  Surrey,  B.C.  and

expanded its Parts Distribution Centre in

Edmonton. At December 31, 1998, the Finning

(Canada) operation had 30 branches and 10

depots, and the number of employees was

2,494  compared  with  2,496  at  the  end  of

1997. Further employment reductions are

expected in the first quarter of 1999 following

a process of early retirements and severances.

C A N A D A   R E V E N U E / N E T   I N C O M E / E A R N I N G S   P E R   S H A R E

( $  T H O U S A N D S )

Revenue 

Net income
Non-recurring items

Adjusted net income

1 9 9 8

1 9 9 7

$ 1,136,917

$ 1,146,406

$

$

34,747
8,191

42,938

$

$

0.44
0.10

0.54

$

$

61,668
(10,007)

51,661

$

$

0.78
(0.13)

0.65

F I N N I N G  I N T E R N A T I O N A L  I N C .

2 2

CANADIAN
EQUIPMENT
DELIVERIES 
BY MARKET 
(CONVERTED TO
SALES DOLLARS) (%)

Mining
Power systems
Construction
Petroleum
Forestry
Other

30
15
14
14
14
13

CANADIAN 
REVENUE 
(BY ACTIVITY) (%)

New equipment
Customer service
Used equipment
Equipment rental
Finance

44
33
14
6
3

E Q U I P M E N T   R E V E N U E Equipment revenue was

C U S T O M E R   S U P P O R T   S E R V I C E S Parts and cus-

$724 million in 1998, an increase of 3% over

tomer service revenue decreased by 7% to

prior year levels. New equipment revenues

$376 million. Parts revenue decreased by 5%

remained flat at 1997 levels while unit deliv-

during the year to $311 million as increased

eries declined by 12%, most notably in the

overall activity in Alberta was more than

forestry and petroleum sectors. New equip-

offset by lower parts sales in B.C. Customer

ment includes an average price increase of

service revenue decreased 17% to $65 mil-

2% for the year, thus revenue declined in real

lion, with service activity levels increasing in

terms. Used equipment sales in the domestic

Alberta and declining in B.C. Increased activ-

market increased 11% to $161 million, due in

ity in oil sands mining, pipeline construction

part to a controlled sale of aged machines.

and diamond mining in the Northwest Terri-

With the exception of the petroleum industry,

tories will provide Finning (Canada) with the

demand for used equipment remained steady

opportunity to increase its parts and cus-

throughout the year.

tomer service support in these sectors.

Equipment rental revenue was up 13%,

The significant fluctuations and overall

due mainly to a 42% increase in the number of

devaluation of the Canadian dollar relative

units available for rent. Other contributing

to  its  U.S.  counterpart  raised  the  selling

factors were the opening of a new rental fleet

price of Caterpillar equipment and parts in

in Grande Prairie and higher valued units in

1998. The foreign exchange movement in

the  fleet.  Utilization  of  the  rental  fleet

1998 increased equipment and parts revenue

returned to normal volumes from the unusu-

by 5% from the prior year.

ally high levels experienced in 1997. The year-

over-year decline in the utilization rate was

due primarily to lower petroleum activity.

The Company expects increased demand for

its rental fleet in 1999 due to the significant

planned pipeline expansions in Alberta and

northern B.C.

F I N A N C E   R E V E N U E Finance revenue remained

flat  in  1998  as  revenues  from  large  fleet

leases and higher interest rates were offset

by the sale of a portion of the finance port-

folio. In June 1998 Finning sold a portfolio

of notes and rental purchase contracts to

Caterpillar Financial Services Ltd. for gross

proceeds  of  $130  million.  Total  finance

assets  declined  18%  from  the  prior  year,

representing a 50% decline in the note port-

folio and a 2% decline in the lease portfolio.

2 3

C A T   T R A C K - T Y P E   T R A C T O R

N E T   I N C O M E Net income from Canadian opera-

Interest expense increased by 20% from

tions in 1998 was $34.7 million compared

the prior year as a result of higher average

with $61.7 million in 1997. Included in net

inventory levels and higher borrowing costs

income for 1998 was a net non-recurring

during 1998. At the end of 1998, total debt

charge of $8.2 million (a $9.6 million charge

increased by 5% from the prior year’s level

for restructuring, severance and relocation

and inventory increased by 19%, the latter

costs offset by a $1.4 million gain on the sale

primarily a reflection of the larger rental

of property). Included in net income for 1997

equipment fleet in Canada.

was a non-recurring gain of $10.0 million

related to insurance proceeds and the sale

of property. Excluding these non-recurring

items, net income was $42.9 million com-

pared with $51.7 million last year, a decline of

17%. Net income also included a $3.4 million

after-tax operating charge on aged inventory

provided for in the first quarter of 1998.

Overall gross profit margins, excluding

finance revenue, were down by 0.7% as a

greater proportion of Finning (Canada)’s rev-

enue shifted from higher margin customer

service to equipment sales. New equipment

margins declined by 0.3% from 1997 levels,

reflecting the increased volume of higher-

dollar, lower-margin mining unit sales. Used

equipment margins were lower by 2% as older

equipment was auctioned off near the end

of the year. Margins for customer support

services were maintained at 1997 levels.

Selling, general and administrative expens-

es, excluding the non-recurring items noted

above, increased by 2% for the year. The

restructuring  actions  taken  by  Finning

(Canada) in 1998 are expected to reduce its

operating costs for 1999 in anticipation of

lower activity levels in Western Canada.

I N D U S T R Y   R E V I E W

M I N I N G In 1998, deliveries of new mining

units by Finning (Canada) increased by 11%

and the value of those units rose 35% com-

pared with the prior year. The value of these

deliveries to the mining industry accounted

for 30% of total new equipment deliveries,

making it the largest end market for Finning

(Canada).

A large package of tractors, trucks, and

shovels  was  delivered  to  BHP  Diamond’s

Ekati mine in the Northwest Territories in

1998. Finning (Canada) continued to make

inroads into the coal mining industry, selling

eleven 240-ton trucks to coal mining prop-

erties in B.C. and Alberta. In 1998, the major

producer groups operating in the Athabasca

oil sands announced that significant capital

investments would be made over the next

decade.  In  the  fourth  quarter,  Syncrude

approved the expansion of its oil sands oper-

ation to its Aurora Mine property, located

north of its Mildred Lake upgrading complex.

In  addition,  Suncor  Energy  is  proceeding

with approvals for its expansion across the

Athabasca River to its Steepbank property,

which is part of its Millennium expansion

project. Both Shell and Mobil are undertaking

feasibility plans for start-up operations near

the Syncrude and Suncor properties. With the

producers utilizing truck and shovel method-

ology for the mining of this resource, the

Athabasca  oil  sands  continue  to  provide

substantial  expansion  opportunities  for

Finning (Canada).

F I N N I N G  I N T E R N A T I O N A L  I N C .

2 4

C O N S T R U C T I O N Deliveries of new construction

F O R E S T R Y The  forest  industry  in  British

units by Finning (Canada) increased by 3%

Columbia faced a significant slowdown in

for the year while the value of those units was

1998  as  prices  declined,  the  demand  for

up 17% compared with 1997. Residential

lumber in Asian markets weakened and a

construction and highway construction and

number of plants closed temporarily during

paving in Alberta were the primary drivers

the year. While unit sales and revenues were

for revenue growth. Governmental demand

down, Finning (Canada) achieved an increase

remained  constant  throughout  the  year

in market share due to higher sales of feller

before declining sharply in the fourth quarter.

bunchers, delimber processors and skidders.

P E T R O L E U M Finning (Canada)’s petroleum activ-

ity is focused on the oil and gas industry as

well as pipeline construction. Drilling activity

Deliveries of new forestry machines declined

by 24% for the year and the value of those

units was down 23% compared with 1997.

in Western Canada was down by approxi-

P O W E R   S Y S T E M S Revenue declined by 5% in

mately 40% in 1998 as oil prices continued

1998 due to the sale of a large power pack-

to decline throughout the year. 

age to the Ekati diamond mine in late 1997.

However, the construction of oil and gas

Excluding this transaction in the prior year,

pipelines provided opportunities in 1998 as

revenues were up 10% in 1998, reflecting

pipeline contractors faced increasing fleet

increased demand for natural gas compressor

requirements.  Enbridge’s  new  Athabasca

packages.

heavy oil pipeline and its Terrace expansion

began construction in 1998. As well, both the

Maritimes and Northeast Pipeline project

and the Alliance natural gas pipeline received

the necessary U.S. and Canadian regulatory

approvals in 1998 and substantial construc-

tion activity is planned for 1999. 

New  units  delivered  to  the  petroleum

sector  by  Finning  (Canada)  decreased  by

25% in 1998 and the value of those units

declined by 22% compared with 1997. Most

of the decline occurred in the second half of

the  year  with  deliveries  down  more  than

60% from 1997 levels.

2 5

C A T   L A N D F I L L   C O M P A C T O R

U N I T E D   K I N G D O M  
O P E R A T I O N S

F I N A N C I A L   R E V I E W

H I G H L I G H T S In 1998, Finning (UK) completed

R E V E N U E Total  revenue  for  Finning  (UK)

the steps necessary to integrate the opera-

increased 40% to $793 million in 1998. These

tions of H. Leverton, acquired October 1,

results included 12 months contribution from

1997. Finning (UK) is now the sole Caterpillar

the former H. Leverton operation, compared

dealer for all of England, Scotland and Wales.

with only three months contribution from

The  integration  of  the  two  operations

H. Leverton in 1997. The 1998 results were

required a two-stage downsizing to form an

also affected by an 8.4% appreciation of the

efficient  national  dealership:  one  stage

British pound against the Canadian dollar,

occurred in the first quarter of 1998 and the

contributing $47 million or 21% of the total

next in the fourth quarter of the year. As a

revenue increase.

result, both the Wigan branch and the Birm-

ingham depot were closed during the year

and three more depots are planned for closure

in 1999. A number of operations and func-

tions were relocated in 1998 and approxi-

mately 10% of the employee workforce was

terminated. At the end of 1998, Finning (UK)

had 14 branches and 12 depots, and had 1,348

employees compared with 1,720 at the end

of 1997.

Finning (UK) was faced with a difficult

operating  environment  in  1998  that  was

exacerbated by the strength of the British

pound relative to other major currencies.

The  high  value  of  the  British  currency

resulted in an influx of imported new and

nearly new equipment into the U.K. market

that adversely affected the sale of new and

used domestic equipment. The strength of

the British pound also prevented the sale of

used equipment overseas. In addition, inter-

est  rates  in  the  U.K.  remained  relatively

high in the first half of 1998 while economic

activity slowed considerably in all regions.

E Q U I P M E N T   R E V E N U E Equipment revenue was

$598 million in 1998, up 50% over the prior

year. The increase in equipment revenue was

the result of increased new equipment sales

which grew 35% to $432 million following

the consolidation of the two dealerships.

Total unit deliveries of new equipment also

increased 27% for the same reasons. Exclud-

ing any increases attributable to the acqui-

sition of H. Leverton, in real terms revenue

and unit deliveries decreased. The decline

reflected fierce competition in the market-

place, particularly from Japanese, Korean

and Swedish manufacturers. Low levels of

infrastructure spending by the government

adversely affected quarrying, and coal min-

ing was affected by uncertainty through the

government’s review of energy policy. Slow

activity levels due to delays and postpone-

ments  in  motorway  and  rail  expansions

U N I T E D   K I N G D O M   R E V E N U E / N E T   I N C O M E / E A R N I N G S   P E R   S H A R E

( $  T H O U S A N D S )

Revenue 

Net income (loss)
Non-recurring items

1 9 9 8

1 9 9 7

$ 793,020

$ 566,376

$

(32,211) $

6,408

(0.41) $
0.08

20,110
(3,183)

$

$

0.26
(0.04)

0.22

Adjusted net income (loss)

$

(25,803) $

(0.33) $

16,927

F I N N I N G  I N T E R N A T I O N A L  I N C .

2 6

U.K. 
EQUIPMENT
DELIVERIES 
BY MARKET 
(CONVERTED TO
SALES DOLLARS) (%)

Plant hire
Power systems
Construction
Materials handling
Quarrying
Mining
Other

21
19
13
13
12 
9
13

U.K. REVENUE
(BY ACTIVITY) (%)

New equipment
Customer service
Used equipment
Equipment rental

54
25
15
6

resulted in lower demand from the plant hire

N E T   I N C O M E Finning (UK) reported a loss of

industry. Major gas projects have remained

$32.2  million  in  1998  compared  with  a

on hold pending the government’s Non-Fossil

$20.1  million  profit  in  1997.  Excluding  a

Fuel Obligation announcements that were

non-recurring charge for the expected sale of

made in October 1998.

BCP Plant Hire, an equipment rental business

Used equipment revenue was $120 mil-

included in the acquisition of H. Leverton, the

lion, an increase of 115% from the prior year

operating loss in 1998 was $25.8 million. In

following the consolidation of the two deal-

addition, net income included an after-tax

erships. This revenue included a $15 million

operating charge of $17.1 million in the year

package negotiated in the first quarter of

to recognize anticipated losses on used equip-

1998  for  151  machines  and  refinancing

ment due to the continued strength of the

packages of $13 million and $10 million in

British pound and depressed local markets.

the second and fourth quarters, respectively.

Overall gross profit margins, excluding

Unit deliveries of used equipment improved

finance revenue, declined by 6% from the

by 33%. Excluding any increases attributable

prior year. New equipment margins declined

to the acquisition of H. Leverton and the

by 3% in 1998 as a result of strong competi-

aforementioned special deals, in real terms

tion from domestic and imported products.

both the domestic and international markets

Used equipment margins were significantly

have slowed significantly.

lower due to the excess supply of used con-

Equipment rental revenue increased by

struction  equipment  in  the  marketplace.

over 100% including the contribution from H.

This, combined with a strong British pound,

Leverton, with a number of machines being

prevented its sale overseas. Customer sup-

utilized on the M74 motorway construction in

port services margins were maintained at

Scotland. Assets in the rental fleet increased

1997 levels.

to $44 million, up 17% from the prior year.

Selling,  general  and  administrative

C U S T O M E R   S U P P O R T   S E R V I C E S Parts and cus-

tomer  service  revenue  increased  29%  to

$195 million in 1998. The increase related to

the additional contribution of H. Leverton for

12 months of operations, which in real terms

means customer service revenue declined.

Genuine Caterpillar parts were sourced by

some U.K. customers from overseas loca-

tions in 1998 and service revenue has been

adversely  affected  by  competition  from

low-cost companies in Britain.

expenses, excluding the non-recurring items,

increased 60% from the prior year. Activity

levels did not increase sufficiently to support

the increased cost structure of the merged

operation.  Action  was  taken  in  1998  to

reduce the cost base in the U.K. operation as

noted earlier. Additional cost savings are

expected in 1999 following the closure of

additional depots, further restructuring of the

organization and an ongoing review of costs.

2 7

C A T   A R T I C U L A T E D   D U M P   T R U C K

Interest expense for Finning (UK) declined

In 1998, a number of infrastructure jobs

by 20% during the year. Total debt levels

were completed while the number of new

declined by 29% year-over-year. This decline

projects declined. The first contracts on the

was principally due to a focused asset man-

delayed Channel Tunnel Rail Link (CTRL) were

agement program in Finning (UK), reducing

awarded  and  preparatory  work  will  com-

inventory and receivable levels by 11% year-

mence in the first quarter of 1999. The CTRL

over-year. In addition, the Company increased

will link London with the Channel Tunnel by

its equity in the U.K. by £25 million in 1998,

high-speed train.

the proceeds of which were used to reduce

The acquisition of Verachtert by Cater-

local borrowings in the U.K.

pillar further expands the range of attach-

I N D U S T R Y   R E V I E W

C O N S T R U C T I O N   A N D   P L A N T   H I R E Government

approval  and  spending  on  infrastructure

projects continued to be constrained under

ments Finning (UK) offers. Verachtert designs

and manufactures a wide range of attach-

ments for use on hydraulic excavators and

wheel loaders.

the Labour government in 1998. There was a

Q U A R R Y I N G Volumes  were  stable  in  the

delay in approval for the Birmingham North-

aggregates industry at approximately 200

ern Relief Road, which is now anticipated to

million tonnes and are forecast to remain at

commence no earlier than 2001.

the same level in 1999. The major companies

In the U.K., there was an overall market

within the industry continued to consolidate.

decline of 10% (in British pounds) in the sale of

The government’s policy is focused on road

equipment to the plant hire and construction

maintenance rather than road building and

industries. The reduction was less dramatic in

many of the traditional quarrying companies

demand for machines under 100-horsepower.

have moved into road reclamation and sur-

The high value of the British pound reduced

facing  through  acquisition  of  specialist

the competitiveness of used equipment being

businesses. The consolidation of the industry

sold into overseas markets. The economic

saw the adoption of centralized equipment

crisis in Asia, coupled with the strong British

purchasing and national customer service

pound,  resulted  in  a  high  level  of  cheap

agreements.  In  1998,  Finning  (UK)’s  new

imports, particularly hydraulic excavators.

equipment sales to this industry declined 3%

European  manufacturers,  particularly  the

(in British pounds), however, unit deliveries

U.K.-based manufacturers forced to sell in

improved 11%.

Britain rather than in their export markets,

responded with lower pricing. The market

was, as a consequence, very price sensitive.

F I N N I N G  I N T E R N A T I O N A L  I N C .

2 8

W A S T E This industry has shown growth in

P O W E R   S Y S T E M S Power systems unit deliveries

1998.  Consolidation  has  taken  place  and

were down by 3%, however, sales were up

three major players are emerging. An increase

almost 40% (in British pounds). Sales to Indus-

in landfill tax has encouraged recycling, and

trial/OEM users were down as the export of

equipment sales to the sector have increased.

compressors and crushing equipment slowed

Segmentation of this market between land-

due to the strength of the pound. The plea-

fill and transfer stations has shown transfer

sure craft sector of the industry remained

stations as the emerging market following the

buoyant and unit deliveries increased 10%

focus on recycling and environmental issues.

over the previous year. Commercial marine

This has been encouraged by the increase in

activity has slowed because of the increase

landfill tax.

in the number of vessels being built overseas

O P E N C A S T   C O A L

In 1998, Finning (UK)’s new

for British owner/operators.

equipment sales to the opencast coal indus-

M A T E R I A L S   H A N D L I N G The Finning (UK) market

try declined 31% (in British pounds) with

share for new equipment is broadly in line

unit deliveries also declining by 13%. A gov-

with 1997. The marketplace is relatively static

ernment  review  of  energy  policy  in  1998

with the majority of deals being for between

resulted in an official moratorium on all gas-

five and 10 trucks with some major fleet

fired power stations in the planning or pre-

deals (primarily the replacement of existing

construction stage. The review confirmed

contracts). The casual rental fleet has grown

that coal as an energy source still has an

by 10%, reflecting customers’ requirements

important role to play in the generation of

to retain full flexibility in the management

the  country’s  electricity.  Deep  mine  coal

of their fleet. Approximately two-thirds of

production still continues to decline while

unit deliveries are on contract rental agree-

open pit coal mines maintained output levels

ments, generally for a period of between

of  approximately  15  million  tonnes.  The

four and five years.

government did announce a 10-point plan

which continues to have an impact on plan-

ning approvals of new opencast projects in

England with somewhat less restrictive con-

straints in Scotland and Wales. Scottish open

pit mining continued to provide new equip-

ment  opportunities,  including  large  rigid

dump truck fleets. Other open pit contractors

continue to purchase equipment in replace-

ment programs.

2 9

C A T   W H E E L   L O A D E R

C H I L E A N  
O P E R A T I O N S

H I G H L I G H T S The Chilean economy was active

in the first half of 1998 but slowed in the

latter part of the year. Lower copper prices,

which fell below US$0.70 per pound in the

fourth quarter of 1998, have resulted in a

curtailment  of  new  mine  expansions  and

new projects. In addition, the construction

industry slowed as the increase in Chilean

interest rates in the third quarter caused a

marked reduction in smaller industrial pro-

jects  and  residential  construction  in  the

fourth quarter. Finning Chile’s new equip-

ment unit deliveries declined by 3% from the

prior year, reflecting this slowdown.

In the third quarter of 1998, the company

terminated 110 employees, reducing the total

workforce by 8% at that time. Throughout

this reorganization, however, the company

has continued to hire talented, experienced

people to improve the delivery of services to

its customers. The total number of employees

at the end of the year was 1,354 compared

with 1,329 at June 30, 1998.

F I N A N C I A L   R E V I E W

R E V E N U E Total  revenue  was  $504  million

compared  with  $514  million  last  year,  a

decrease of 2%. An increase in customer sup-

port services revenue was offset by a decline

in equipment revenue. The 1998 results were

also affected by a 7.1% appreciation of the

U.S. dollar against the Canadian dollar that

contributed $37 million in increased revenue.

C H I L E   R E V E N U E / N E T   I N C O M E / E A R N I N G S   P E R   S H A R E

E Q U I P M E N T   R E V E N U E Equipment revenue was

$301 million in 1998, a decrease of 9% from

the prior year. New equipment sales were

down 12% to $254 million, primarily due to

lower  sales  to  the  mining  industry.  The

Chilean mining industry was affected by low

global commodity prices for both copper and

gold. Used equipment sales were up 52% to

$25 million, reflecting the Company’s focus

on reducing aged inventories.

Equipment rental revenue declined 8% to

$23 million. Due to the economic downturn,

several  equipment  owners  that  have  idle

machines are competing in the rental fleet

market. These and other new competitors

have put pressure on sales in this sector. In

1998, Finning Chile’s rental fleet served pri-

marily larger projects, such as the natural

gas pipeline projects in northern Chile as well

as small equipment rental requirements in

the Santiago area.

C U S T O M E R   S U P P O R T   S E R V I C E S Parts and cus-

tomer  service  revenue  increased  to  $201

million, up 11% from 1997. Due to the large

number of machines delivered to the mining

industry over the past five years, there has

been  an  increasing  demand  for  customer

support services. There were over 300 large

Caterpillar trucks operating in Chile at the end

of 1998. Service revenue was also affected

in part by adjustments taken on maturing

maintenance and repair contracts.

( $  T H O U S A N D S )

Revenue 

Net income
Non-recurring items

Adjusted net income

F I N N I N G  I N T E R N A T I O N A L  I N C .

1 9 9 8

$ 503,505

$ 514,068

$

$

3,424
862

4,286

$

$

0.04
0.01

0.05

$

$

19,535
—

19,535

$

$

1 9 9 7

0.25
—

0.25

3 0

CHILEAN 
EQUIPMENT
DELIVERIES 
BY MARKET 
(CONVERTED TO
SALES DOLLARS) (%)

Mining
Construction
Kenworth
Power systems
Forestry

62
20
10
6
2

CHILEAN 
REVENUE
(BY ACTIVITY) (%)

New equipment
50
Customer support services 40
5
Used equipment
5
Equipment rental

N E T   I N C O M E Net income decreased to $3.4

In  1998,  the  U.S.  dollar  strengthened

million compared with $19.5 million in 1997.

against the Chilean peso by 7.6% from the

The decline in net income was principally

prior year. The majority of Finning Chile’s rev-

due to lower equipment sales, lower gross

enue is U.S. dollar-based while its costs are

margins  and  further  provisions  taken  on

in pesos. Therefore, the change resulted in

service maintenance contracts. Net income

decreased local costs in relation to Finning

also included a non-recurring charge of $0.9

Chile’s U.S. dollar-based revenues. This is

million in severance costs provided for in

opposite the trend experienced in the past

the third quarter of 1998. In addition, net

three  years  which  saw  the  Chilean  peso

income included a $3.3 million operating

strengthening against the U.S. dollar. The

charge on aged inventory provided for in

Chilean inflation rate declined to 4.5% in

the first quarter of 1998.

1998 compared with 6.1% in 1997.

Overall gross profit margins, excluding

finance  revenue,  were  down  by  1%.  New

equipment margins declined by 0.2% from

1997 levels. Used equipment margins were

significantly lower, reflecting sales of aged

equipment during the year. Parts margins

were up by 6% and customer service margins

were down in the year due to losses on service

maintenance  contracts,  reflecting  higher

than anticipated maintenance costs. 

Selling,  general  and  administrative

expenses increased 5% over the prior year’s

level but were up marginally as a percent-

age of revenue. Interest expense was up 15%

from the prior year due to higher interest

rates and average borrowing levels during

1998. However, at the end of the year, total

debt declined 13% from the prior year, a

reflection of a 14% decline in inventory levels

year-over-year.

I N D U S T R Y   R E V I E W

M I N I N G The development of new copper and

gold mining projects in Chile slowed down in

1998 due to a decline in both the global base

and precious metal prices. However, pro-

duction from existing copper mines in Chile

increased 8% from the prior year. Deliveries of

new mining units by Finning Chile decreased

28% and revenue decreased 15% over the

prior year. The value of mining deliveries

accounted for 62% of total new equipment

deliveries in Finning Chile in 1998, the same

level as 1997. Large earthmoving packages

sold to leading mining companies in Chile

included the delivery of 38 pieces of equip-

ment for $25 million to the Los Pelambres

mine project and the delivery of seven off-

highway trucks and three pieces of mining

support  equipment  for  $23  million  to

Radomiro Tomic.

3 1

C A T   W H E E L   T R A C T O R   S C R A P E R

C O N S T R U C T I O N In 1998, construction of infra-

P O W E R   S Y S T E M S In 1998, power systems rev-

structure, highway and residential housing

enue declined by 38% from the prior year. Unit

projects slowed during the year. An increase

deliveries, however, improved 135% com-

in Chilean interest rates in the third quarter

pared with 1997, a reflection of the smaller

resulted in a reduction in smaller industrial

units sold in 1998. The marine engine market

projects and residential construction in the

was dramatically lower due to unfavourable

fourth quarter. Consequently, unit deliveries

fishing conditions brought on by the El Niño

to the construction industry declined in the

current, and commercial fishing restrictions

third quarter and decreased more signifi-

imposed by government authorities. In 1999,

cantly in the fourth quarter. For the year,

the ships being constructed in Chilean ship-

deliveries  of  new  construction  units  by

yards for the export markets should increase

Finning Chile decreased 16% and total rev-

demand for marine engines. Also, Finning

enue decreased 18% over the prior year. How-

Chile is reintroducing the Olympia line of

ever, large concession infrastructure projects

Caterpillar generators in 1999. New market

under construction – such as the north and

strategies are being developed for indus-

south expansions of the Pan American high-

tries located in Santiago, a market that was

way and large pipeline projects – are proceed-

not previously served by Finning Chile.

ing. In addition, the Chilean government is

continuing its strategy to privatize and mod-

ernize seaports, airports, irrigation and hydro-

electric dams in Chile.

F O R E S T R Y Activity  in  the  forest  industry

declined  due  to  low  international  pulp

prices,  which  were  down  approximately

20% in 1998 (US$403 per ton in the second

K E N W O R T H Kenworth truck sales decreased by

half of 1998 compared with US$506 per ton

9% to $25 million in 1998 while the number

in the second half of 1997). New equipment

of units delivered almost matched that of

sales to this industry decreased 14% from

1997. Given the general slowdown in the

1997 levels, representing only 2% of total

Chilean economy, the Class 7 and 8 truck

new equipment sales in 1998.

population in the country declined by 18% in

1998. The trend is expected to continue into

1999  as  an  additional  10%  reduction  in

demand is expected. Finning’s ability to pen-

etrate new segments in the construction and

retail distribution markets was successful in

1998 due to sales of T-300 trucks to both

Coca-Cola and the Ejército de Chile (Chilean

Army). Despite current market conditions,

Finning Chile and Kenworth are bidding on

several large truck orders in 1999 for cus-

tomers in the food distribution industry.

F I N N I N G  I N T E R N A T I O N A L  I N C .

3 2

I N T E R N A T I O N A L  
O P E R A T I O N S

The profit generated by UMS was more

H I G H L I G H T S International operations is com-

than offset by the expenses associated with

prised of Universal Machinery Services (UMS),

the corporate head office and showed a loss

a division of Finning International Inc., and

of $2.8 million in 1998 compared with net

the expenses associated with the corporate

income of $2.4 million in the prior year. Net

head  office  of  Finning  International  Inc.

income  in  1998  included  a  $3.2  million

UMS was established in 1992 and focuses

after-tax operating charge on aged inventory

on the growing international used equip-

provided for in the first quarter of 1998.

ment business. UMS has sales operations in

The majority of UMS’ sales in 1998 were

Western Canada, the United Kingdom and

to customers in the United States, Europe,

the  southeastern  United  States.  Through

Mexico and South America. UMS continues

these  locations,  UMS  covers  the  interna-

to lead the used equipment business in sales

tional used equipment market. This division

of large crawler tractors, wheel loaders and

sells both used equipment and used parts,

off-highway trucks. Large construction and

primarily Caterpillar, around the world.

mining packages were sourced from South-

F I N A N C I A L   R E V I E W

UMS revenue for 1998 totalled $152 million,

an increase of 50% compared with $101 mil-

lion the prior year. Equipment revenue was

$140 million, an increase of 48% over 1997. In

the U.K., sales increased by $27 million, pri-

marily as a result of the acquisition of H. Lev-

erton in late 1997. In the U.S., UMS sold a

large fleet of pipelayers in June 1998 that

were previously held in joint venture with a

U.S.-based Caterpillar dealer. Total unit deliv-

eries in 1998 improved 83% from last year,

partly due to the H. Leverton acquisition and

the pipelayer fleet sale. Parts revenue con-

tinued  to  increase  to  $11  million,  a  67%

increase year-over-year, reflecting additional

resources and internet trading of used parts.

east Asia in 1998. In particular, there was an

increase in the supply of low-hour used con-

struction equipment from Southeast Asia

into the global marketplace as that region

of the world suffered a rapid slowdown in

activity in 1998.

UMS added two more Caterpillar dealers

to its agency and dealer arrangements during

1998. Currently, 50% of UMS inventory is

held jointly with other dealers through these

commercial marketing agreements. Although

a  flat  market  trend  is  forecast  for  1999,

higher revenue and profitability is expected

from UMS as the operation expands its sales

force in 1999.

I N T E R N A T I O N A L   R E V E N U E / N E T   I N C O M E / E A R N I N G S   P E R   S H A R E

( $  T H O U S A N D S )

Revenue 

Net income (loss)
Non-recurring items

Adjusted net income (loss)

1 9 9 8

$ 151,979

$ 101,214

$

$

(2,775) $
—

(0.03) $
—

2,382
—

(2,775) $

(0.03) $

2,382

$

$

1 9 9 7

0.03
—

0.03

3 3

C A T   G R A P P L E   S K I D D E R

L I Q U I D I T Y   A N D  
C A P I T A L   R E S O U R C E S

Cash used in investing activities totalled

Finning management assesses liquidity in

$34 million, representing net capital expen-

terms of its ability to generate sufficient

ditures of $34 million compared with $36

cash flow to fund its operations. Net cash

million in 1997.

flow is affected by: (1) operating activities,

In Canada, total capital expenditures were

including the level of accounts receivable,

$29 million. The new branch facility in Surrey,

inventories, accounts payable and financing

B.C.,  the  Edmonton  head  office  building

provided to customers; (2) investing activi-

renovations and the Edmonton parts distri-

ties, including acquisitions of complementary

bution centre expansion accounted for over

businesses, capital expenditure and dividend

50% of 1998 capital expenditures, with the

levels; and (3) external financing, including

balance being spent on vehicles, shop tools

bank credit lines, commercial paper and other

and equipment. The gross expenditures were

capital market activities, providing both short

offset by proceeds on disposal of $7.8 million,

and long-term financing.

which represents the sale of two major prop-

Cash  flow  from  operations,  before

erties in Langley and Vancouver, as the Com-

changes in operating assets and liabilities,

pany continues to manage its property usage.

was $226 million in 1998 compared with

In the U.K., total capital expenditures were

$317 million in 1997. The decrease from 1997

$6.8 million and included the acquisition of

was primarily a result of weaker earnings in

the Glasgow branch premises, replacing the

all operations.

property sold in 1996. During 1998, there

Cash generated from operating activities

was a restriction on capital expenditures due

was positive $71 million compared with neg-

to the adverse trading conditions. The gross

ative $47 million in 1997. Cash flow from

expenditures  were  offset  by  proceeds  on

operations was offset by increased invento-

disposal of $1.3 million related to the sale of

ries to meet delivery and customer rental

fixed assets from the Company’s Polish oper-

requirements,  a  lower  level  of  accounts

ations, which were sold in February of 1998.

payable and income taxes payable, and cash

used to expand lease and rental-purchase

financing activities in Finning (Canada).

F I N N I N G  I N T E R N A T I O N A L  I N C .

3 4

In Chile, total capital expenditures were

Canadian Bond Rating Service (CBRS) and

$8.1 million and included the acquisition of

Dominion Bond Rating Service (DBRS) both

land for the future component rebuild centre

rate the Company’s term debt A (low); the

in Antofagasta scheduled for construction in

Company’s commercial paper is rated A-1

1999. Offsetting the expenditures were pro-

and R-1 (low), respectively. The term debt

ceeds on disposal of $1.7 million as Finning

ratings  were  reaffirmed  in  the  past  year

Chile sold its vehicle fleet in late 1998 and

with the filing of a shelf prospectus for a

will begin leasing vehicles in 1999.

$300 million Medium Term Note Program in

After providing for these changes in cash

1998. The short-term ratings were also reaf-

flow, short-term debt decreased by $9 million

firmed in 1998 with the increase of Finning’s

in 1998 to $609 million.

commercial paper program from $150 million

Finning accesses the term debt and short-

to $300 million in August 1998. On February

term  debt  markets  to  meet  its  liquidity

15, 1999, DBRS placed its rating of Finning

and financing needs. At December 31, 1998,

“under review” with negative implications. 

consolidated term debt was $523 million

Finning also has committed and uncom-

compared with $521 million at the end of

mitted bank facilities available to meet liquid-

1997, which included both fixed and float-

ity requirements. Management believes that

ing rate debt. Total fixed-rate term debt at

the sources of funds available to Finning are

December  31,  1998  was  comprised  of:  a

adequate to meet the operating requirements

£25.0 million loan ($64 million) at 7.675%,

of the Company.

maturing on May 8, 2002; Series A Senior

Debentures of $75 million at 8.35%, matur-

ing on March 22, 2004; and Series B Senior

Debentures of $75 million at 6.6%, maturing

on December 8, 2006. Term debt, which pro-

vides funding stability, accounted for 46.2%

of total debt outstanding at the end of 1998

compared with 45.8% at the end of 1997.

3 5

C A T   O F F - H I G H W A Y   T R U C K

B A L A N C E  
S H E E T   L E V E R A G E

equity. Finning applies a conservative debt

Finning’s balance sheet is comprised of three

to equity ratio of 7:1 to its finance operation

major components, namely its operating,

and 5:1 to its rental operation. Total debt

finance and rental activities. Each of these

and shareholder’s equity is allocated to the

major  business  segments  has  a  different

operating,  finance  and  rental  activities.

risk profile. Accordingly, Finning applies a

Deferred income taxes are allocated based

different capital structure and leverage to

on the assets and liabilities assigned to the

each business segment.

operating, finance and rental activities.

The finance assets and rental assets are

The following table provides Finning’s

supported  by  a  combination  of  debt  and

capital structure on a segregated basis.

( $  T H O U S A N D S )

1 9 9 8
Assets

O P E R AT I O N S

R E N TA L

F I N A N C E

C O N S O L I D AT E D

$ 1,543,948

$ 268,033

$ 417,620

$ 2,229,601

L I A B I L I T I E S   &   S H A R E H O L D E R S ’   E Q U I T Y
Short-term debt and term debt
Deferred income taxes
Other liabilities

Shareholders’ equity

$ 563,579
(12,168)
409,003

$ 212,781
12,696
—

$ 355,775
11,020
—

$ 1,132,135
11,548
409,003

960,414
583,534

225,477
42,556

366,795
50,825

1,552,686
676,915

$ 1,543,948

$ 268,033

$ 417,620

$ 2,229,601

Debt to equity ratio

0.97:1

5.0:1

7.0:1

1.67:1

1 9 9 7
Assets

L I A B I L I T I E S   &   S H A R E H O L D E R S ’   E Q U I T Y
Short-term debt and term debt
Deferred income taxes
Other liabilities

Shareholders’ equity

$ 1,613,775

$ 222,848

$ 515,254

$ 2,351,877

$ 530,114
3,670
489,875

$ 175,842
11,838
—

$ 433,265
20,094
—

$ 1,139,221
35,602
489,875

1,023,659
590,116

187,680
35,168

453,359
61,895

1,664,698
687,179

$ 1,613,775

$ 222,848

$ 515,254

$ 2,351,877

Debt to equity ratio

0.90:1

5.0:1

7.0:1

1.66:1

F I N N I N G  I N T E R N A T I O N A L  I N C .

3 6

CASH 126÷317=0.397
FLOW FROM 
OPERATIONS
($ MILLIONS)

98
97
96
95

226
317
245
210

GROSS CAPITAL
EXPENDITURES
($ MILLIONS) 126÷317=0.397

98
97
96
95

44
47
43
26

O P E R A T I N G   A C T I V I T I E S

Finning  has  a  policy  of  arranging  its

Finning’s debt to equity ratio for its operat-

financing so that the fixed rate financing

ing activities (excluding finance and rental

offered to its customers is matched by fixed

activities) increased to 0.97:1 from 0.90:1.

rate borrowings. As well, the portfolio is

The increase in the debt to equity ratio was

matched on currency and term. Finning enters

primarily due to an increase in short-term

into swap agreements, which fix the effective

debt related to higher inventory levels and to

interest rate and currency of the borrowing.

a lower level of equity. Finning’s objective is

This is an effective and flexible method of

to maintain a leverage ratio for its operating

matching fixed rate terms provided to cus-

activities below 1:1.

tomers with fixed rate debt obligations. 

Finning manages its leverage through

At December 31, 1998, Finning had inter-

balance  sheet  management  rather  than

est rate swap agreements which fixed the

equity issuance. The debt to equity ratio of

semi-annual  interest  rate  on  $73  million

operations is managed through receivables

compared with $89 million of borrowings at

collection, inventory turnover and strong

the end of 1997, at a weighted average rate

earnings  and  efficiencies  throughout  the

of 5.60% compared with 6.06% at the end of

Company.

F I N A N C E   A C T I V I T I E S

At December 31, 1998 the portfolio of finance

assets totalled $418 million compared with

$515 million at December 31, 1997. During

1998, Finning (Canada) sold $122 million of

its finance assets to Caterpillar Finance as

1997. There were swap agreements outstand-

ing at December 31, 1998 for $44 million,

down from $51 million at the end of 1997.

These agreements extend beyond one year

for varying periods up to January 2002, at

an average interest rate of 5.47% compared

with 5.92% at the end of 1997.

part  of  the  strategy  to  manage  leverage

R E N T A L   A C T I V I T I E S

through balance sheet management.

At December 31, 1998, Finning had rental

Finning (Canada) was the only operation

assets of $268 million compared with $223

with significant financing activity in 1998.

million at the end of 1997. The rental busi-

Finning (Canada) offers fixed and floating rate

ness provides customers with the freedom to

financing to its customers. At December 31,

utilize reliable equipment on a “needs-only

1998,  approximately  29%  of  the  finance

basis” to maximize return without the risks

portfolio was at fixed rates compared with

inherent in longer-term capital investment.

approximately 27% at the end of 1997. 

The majority of the increase in rental assets

during the year was in Finning (Canada) which

increased its new Caterpillar, materials han-

dling and power systems fleets.

3 7

C A T   H Y D R A U L I C   E X C A V A T O R

S H A R E  
C A P I T A L

with a single counterparty, and by dealing

The Company’s share capital is comprised of

only with Canadian and international institu-

both preferred and common shares. The pre-

tions with high credit ratings.

ferred shares outstanding at December 31,

1998 amounted to $1.0 million compared

with $1.2 million at the end of 1997 and are

convertible into common shares at a conver-

sion rate of $6.3675 per common share.

During 1998, a total of 310,656 common

shares were issued on the exercise of stock

options  and  26,611  common  shares  were

issued on the conversion of 16,950 preferred

shares. The number of stock options out-

standing  at  December  31,  1998  totalled

5,141,673 at exercise prices from $5.49 to

$17.00.

Finning has an employee common share

purchase plan for its Canadian employees.

Under the terms of this plan, eligible employ-

ees  may  purchase  common  shares  of  the

Company in the open market at market value.

Finning pays a portion of the purchase price to

a maximum of 2% of employee earnings. The

plan may be cancelled by Finning at any time.

At December 31, 1998, 59% of employees

were participating in this plan compared with

63% at the end of 1997.

F I N A N C I A L  
D E R I V A T I V E S

F I N A N C I A L   R I S K S  
A N D   U N C E R T A I N T I E S

Finning’s financial performance is subject

to two direct sources of currency exchange

risk. The first source of currency exchange

risk relates to fluctuations in the purchase

price of inventory. Canada and Chile source

the majority of their product from the United

States and, as a consequence, exchange rate

movements affect the transaction price for

most equipment and parts. Finning is gener-

ally able to manage this risk through adjust-

ments in the pricing of its product sales.

The  second  source  of  exchange  risk

relates to the fact that Finning’s U.K. and

Chilean operations are recorded in the Com-

pany’s financial statements in Canadian dol-

lars, while those operations conduct business

primarily in British pounds in the U.K., and

Chilean  pesos  and  U.S.  dollars  in  Chile.

Changes in the British pound, Chilean peso

and U.S. dollar to Canadian dollar exchange

rate directly affect the financial performance

in  Canadian  dollars  of  Finning’s  U.K.  and

Chilean operations.

Finning’s sales are also indirectly affected

Finning uses various financial instruments

by  fluctuations  in  commodity  prices  and

such as interest rate swaps as hedges against

exchange rates. In Canada, commodity price

actual  assets  or  liabilities.  For  example,

movements  in  the  forestry,  metals  and

Finning hedges the finance portfolio with

petroleum sectors can have an impact on

funding of similar rates and terms. Derivative

customers’  demands  for  equipment  and

financial instruments are always associated

customer service. In Chile, significant fluc-

with a related risk position. Finning contin-

tuations in the price of copper and gold can

ually evaluates and manages risks associated

have  similar  effects.  In  the  U.K.,  lower

with  financial  derivatives.  This  includes

prices for thermal coal may reduce equip-

counterparty credit exposure. Finning man-

ment demand in that sector. In addition, the

ages its credit exposure by ensuring there is

strength of the British pound relative to other

no substantial concentration of credit risk

currencies may result in lower activity levels

in the used equipment market.

F I N N I N G  I N T E R N A T I O N A L  I N C .

3 8

Y E A R   2 0 0 0  
I S S U E

Finning’s core systems and its informa-

The “Year 2000 Issue” is a general term used

tion systems strategy are closely linked with

to refer to certain business implications of

those  of  Caterpillar,  which  is  taking  the

the arrival of the new millennium. In simple

actions  necessary  to  ensure  its  products

terms,  these  implications  arise  largely

and services will continue to operate on and

because  it  has  been  normal  practice  for

after January 1, 2000. Caterpillar’s deadline

computer  hardware  and  software  to  use

to have all products and services ready for

only two digits rather than four to record

the year 2000 is March 31, 1999. Finning has

the year in date fields. On January 1, 2000,

undertaken a program to address the Year

when the year is designated as “00”, many

2000 Issue beyond its information technology

computer  systems  could  either  fail  com-

department. The program involves all key

pletely or create erroneous data as a result

service providers.

of misinterpretation of the year.

In 1998, Finning engaged Arthur Andersen

Finning has been planning for the year

LLP to conduct a full review of the year 2000

2000 since the mid-to-late eighties when it

project status. The project’s scope covered

changed all its databases and converted its

Canada, the U.K. and Chile. The review began

mainframe systems in Canada and the U.K. to

in  February  1998  and  was  completed  by

allow for the year 2000. The core systems in all

mid-year. Finning has already acted on the

three dealerships have now been replaced by

recommendations of this review. A simulation

Caterpillar’s Dealer Business System version

test of the year 2000 was performed on the

2.0, which is year 2000 compliant. Third party

AS/400-based systems in 1998. The test was

software components of our core systems,

successful and Finning intends to test all sys-

such as the payroll and general ledger pack-

tems again before the end of 1999. A special

ages, are all year 2000 compliant. All future

year 2000 committee has been assigned the

software developed in-house and acquired

responsibility of assessing contingency needs

externally  will  be  year  2000  compliant.

in the first half of 1999. Contingency prepa-

Finning is constantly verifying that informa-

rations resulting from the committee’s rec-

tion technology hardware purchased, such as

ommendations will occur in the second half

network servers, is year 2000 compliant.

of 1999.

The information systems department has

The financial impact of making further

acquired  specific  software  that  scans  all

system changes is not expected to be material

applications  running  on  PC’s  in  use  at

to Finning’s financial position or results of

Finning in order to verify the year 2000 com-

operations.

pliance of the software. Finning has also

entered into a PC leasing agreement that will

see all older, potentially non-compliant hard-

ware replaced well before the end of the year.

3 9

C A T   B A C K H O E   L O A D E R

M A N A G E M E N T ’ S   R E P O R T  
T O   T H E   S H A R E H O L D E R S

The Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company have been prepared by management in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and necessarily include some amounts
that are based on management’s best estimates and judgements of all information available up to
January 29, 1999.

The Company maintains an accounting system and related controls to provide management
with reasonable assurance that transactions are executed and recorded in accordance with its
authorizations, that assets are properly safeguarded and accounted for, and that financial records
are reliable for preparation of financial statements.

The Company’s independent auditors, appointed by the shareholders, express an opinion as to
whether management’s financial statements present fairly the Company’s financial position,
operating results and cash flow in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, consisting solely of outside directors, meets
regularly during the year with financial officers of the Company and the external auditors to review
internal accounting controls, risk management, audit results, quarterly financial results and
accounting principles and practices. In addition, the Audit Committee reports its findings to the
Board of Directors which reviews and approves the Consolidated Financial Statements contained
in this Annual Report.

The financial statements have, in management’s opinion, been properly prepared within reason-
able limits of materiality and within the framework of the accounting policies summarized in Note 1
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Financial information elsewhere in this Annual
Report is consistent with that in the financial statements.

R . T.  M a h l e r
E X E C U T I V E  V I C E  P R E S I D E N T  A N D  C H I E F  F I N A N C I A L  O F F I C E R
J A N U A R Y  2 9 ,  1 9 9 9 ,  VA N C O U V E R ,  B C ,  C A N A D A

A U D I T O R S ’
R E P O R T

To the Shareholders of Finning International Inc.:
We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Finning International Inc. (a Canadian corpo-
ration) as at December 31, 1998 and 1997 and the consolidated statements of income and retained
earnings and cash flow for the years then ended. These Consolidated Financial Statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
Consolidated Financial Statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those stan-
dards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the Consoli-
dated Financial Statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall Consolidated Financial Statement presentation.
In our opinion, these Consolidated Financial Statements present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of the Company as at December 31, 1998 and 1997 and the results of its
operations and changes in its financial position for the years then ended in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles.

A r t h u r  A n d e r s e n  L L P
C H A R T E R E D  A C C O U N TA N T S
J A N U A R Y  2 9 ,  1 9 9 9 ,  VA N C O U V E R ,  B C ,  C A N A D A

F I N N I N G  I N T E R N A T I O N A L  I N C .

4 0

C O N S O L I D A T E D  
B A L A N C E   S H E E T S   (NOTE 1)

A S  AT  D E C E M B E R  3 1  ( $  T H O U S A N D S )

1 9 9 8

1 9 9 7

A S S E T S
Accounts receivable

I N V E N T O R I E S
On-hand equipment
Rental equipment (NOTE 2)
Parts and supplies

F I N A N C E   A S S E T S
Instalment notes receivable (NOTES 3 AND 9)
Equipment leased to customers (NOTE 4)

Land, buildings and equipment (NOTE 5)
Goodwill (NOTE 6)

L I A B I L I T I E S   A N D   S H A R E H O L D E R S '   E Q U I T Y
Short-term debt (NOTES 7 AND 9)
Accounts payable and accruals
Income taxes payable
Term debt (NOTES 8 AND 9)
Deferred income taxes

Total liabilities

S H A R E H O L D E R S '   E Q U I T Y
Share capital (NOTE 10)
Retained earnings
Cumulative currency translation adjustments (NOTE 11)

Total shareholders' equity

Approved by the Directors:

$ 400,208

$ 478,588

554,704
268,033
276,407

553,179
222,848
283,734

1,099,144

1,059,761

99,930
317,690

417,620
236,066
76,563

201,721
313,533

515,254
219,507
78,767

$ 2,229,601

$ 2,351,877

$ 608,974
421,326
(12,323)
523,161
11,548

$ 618,018
460,099
29,776
521,203
35,602

1,552,686

1,664,698

208,579
458,366
9,970

205,591
471,116
10,472

676,915

687,179

$ 2,229,601

$ 2,351,877

J . F.  S h e p a r d
D I R E C T O R

W. R .  W y m a n
D I R E C T O R

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

4 1

C O N S O L I D A T E D   S T A T E M E N T S  
O F   I N C O M E   A N D   R E T A I N E D   E A R N I N G S

F O R  T H E  Y E A R S  E N D E D  D E C E M B E R  3 1  ( $  T H O U S A N D S  E X C E P T  P E R  S H A R E  A M O U N T S )

1 9 9 8

1 9 9 7

R E V E N U E
New equipment
Used equipment
Equipment rental
Customer support services
Finance and other

Total revenue
Cost of sales

Gross profit
Selling, general and administrative

Earnings before interest and taxes
Finance cost and interest on other indebtedness (NOTES 7 AND 8)

Income before provision for income taxes
Provision for income taxes (NOTE 13)

Net income

Dividends on preferred shares

Earnings attributable to common shares
Retained earnings, beginning of year

Dividends on common shares

Retained earnings, end of year

E A R N I N G S   P E R   S H A R E   (NOTE 14)
Basic
Fully diluted
Average number of common shares outstanding (NOTE 14)

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

$ 1,186,744
442,473
133,667
783,445
39,092

$ 1,115,203
309,014
104,347
743,749
54,751

2,585,421
2,004,358

2,327,064
1,718,229

581,063
498,334

82,729
75,179

7,550
4,365

3,185

67

3,118
471,116

474,234
15,868

608,835
392,210

216,625
67,274

149,351
45,656

103,695

50

103,645
383,232

486,877
15,761

$ 458,366

$ 471,116

0.04
$
0.04
$
79,328,826

1.32
$
1.27
$
78,809,441

F I N N I N G  I N T E R N A T I O N A L  I N C .

4 2

C O N S O L I D A T E D   S T A T E M E N T S  
O F   C A S H   F L O W

F O R  T H E  Y E A R S  E N D E D  D E C E M B E R  3 1  ( $  T H O U S A N D S )

1 9 9 8

1 9 9 7

O P E R A T I N G   A C T I V I T I E S
Net income
Add (deduct) items not affecting cash:
Depreciation
Amortization of goodwill
Deferred income taxes
Equipment/parts provisions
Restructuring charges
Warranty reserves
Other items

C H A N G E S   I N   O P E R A T I N G   A S S E T S   A N D   L I A B I L I T I E S
Accounts receivable
Inventories:
On-hand equipment
Rental equipment
Parts and supplies

Finance assets:
Instalment notes receivable
Equipment leased to customers, net of disposals

Accounts payable and accruals
Income taxes payable

Cash provided by (used for) operating activities

I N V E S T I N G   A C T I V I T I E S
Acquisition of subsidiary companies (NOTE 15)
Add: short-term debt assumed, net of cash acquired
Cash invested in land, buildings and equipment, net of disposals

Cash used for investing activities

F I N A N C I N G   A C T I V I T I E S
Proceeds from increase in term debt
Payments on term debt
Conversion and redemption of preferred shares
Issue of common shares on conversion
of preferred shares and exercise of stock options
Dividends paid
Currency translation adjustments

Cash provided by (used for) financing activities

Decrease (increase) in short-term debt
Short-term debt at beginning of year

Short-term debt at end of year

C A S H   P A I D   D U R I N G   T H E   Y E A R   F O R
Interest

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

4 3

$

3,185

$ 103,695

189,627
2,204
(13,163)
33,756
13,436
(3,615)
738

197,533
1,586
(7,357)
14,838
—
9,911
(3,475)

226,168

316,731

86,469

(107,564)

(5,659)
(113,039)
194

(114,137)
(142,716)
(84,756)

101,348
(95,349)

(74,567)
(54,277)

58,751
(104,240)

109,982
21,390

71,288

(46,559)

—
—
(33,868)

(51,481)
(85,726)
(35,615)

(33,868)

(172,822)

58,172
(68,158)
(170)

3,158
(15,935)
(5,443)

(28,376)

9,044
618,018

47,010
(1,415)
(315)

4,335
(15,811)
(12,479)

21,325

(198,056)
419,962

$ 608,974

$ 618,018

$

70,027

$

58,933

N O T E S   T O   T H E   C O N S O L I D A T E D  
F I N A N C I A L   S T A T E M E N T S  

D E C E M B E R  3 1 ,  1 9 9 8  A N D  1 9 9 7  ( $  T H O U S A N D S ,  E X C E P T  T H E  N U M B E R  O F  S H A R E S  A N D  P E R  S H A R E  A M O U N T S )

[1] S U M M A R Y   O F   S I G N I F I C A N T   A C C O U N T I N G   P O L I C I E S
These Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting

principles generally accepted in Canada which require management to make estimates and

assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent

assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and

expenses during the reporting period. The significant accounting policies used in these Consolidated

Financial Statements are as follows:

P R I N C I P L E S   O F   C O N S O L I D A T I O N The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the

Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. Principal operating subsidiaries include Finning (UK)

Ltd. and Finning Chile S.A.

C U R R E N C Y   T R A N S L A T I O N Transactions undertaken in foreign currencies are translated into Canadian

dollars at approximate exchange rates prevailing at the time the transactions occurred.

Account balances denominated in foreign currencies are translated into Canadian dollars as

follows: (1) Monetary assets and liabilities at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet dates;

non-monetary items at historical exchange rates; (2) Exchange gains and losses are included in

income except where monetary liabilities are considered to be hedges, in which case they are

deferred and accounted for in conjunction with the hedged asset.

Financial statements of self-sustaining foreign operations are translated into Canadian dollars

as follows: (1) Assets and liabilities using the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet dates;

(2) Revenue and expense items at approximate exchange rates prevailing at the time the transactions

occurred; (3) Unrealized translation gains and losses are deferred and included as a separate compo-

nent of shareholders’ equity. These cumulative currency translation adjustments are recognized

in income when there has been a reduction in the net investment in the self-sustaining foreign

operation; (4) The Company has hedged its operations in its foreign subsidiaries by borrowing

funds in foreign currency. Exchange gains or losses are accounted for in the cumulative currency

translation adjustments.

F I N N I N G  I N T E R N A T I O N A L  I N C .

4 4

I N V E N T O R I E S Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Cost is determined

on a specific item, actual cost basis for both on-hand and rental equipment. For parts and supplies,

approximately 59% is recorded on a first-in, first-out basis and the remainder on an average cost

basis. Rental equipment inventories are depreciated to the estimated residual value of each unit

based on usage.

E Q U I P M E N T   L E A S E D   T O   C U S T O M E R S Depreciation of equipment leased to customers is provided in

the accounts in equal monthly amounts over the terms of the individual leases after recognizing

the estimated residual value of each unit at the end of each lease.

L A N D ,   B U I L D I N G S   A N D   E Q U I P M E N T Land, buildings and equipment are recorded at cost, net of

accumulated depreciation. Buildings and equipment are depreciated over their estimated useful

lives on a declining balance basis using the following annual rates:
Buildings
General equipment
Automotive equipment

5%
20% – 30%
30%

R E V E N U E   R E C O G N I T I O N Revenue from sales of products and services is recognized at the time of

shipment of products to, and performance of services for customers. Equipment lease and rental

revenue is recognized over the term of the lease or rental. Finance income is recognized as earned.

P E N S I O N   C O S T S The Company and its subsidiaries have defined benefit and defined contribution

pension plans. For defined benefit pension plans, the cost of pension benefits is based on reports

prepared by independent actuaries every two years in the U.K. and three years in Canada, using

management’s best estimate assumptions and a projected benefit method prorated on services.

Adjustments arising from plan amendments, changes in assumptions and experience gains or

losses are amortized on a straight line basis over the expected average remaining service life of

the employee groups covered by the plans. For defined contribution plans, the cost of pension

benefits is a fixed percentage of member earnings for the year.

G O O D W I L L Goodwill acquired on the acquisition of subsidiaries is amortized to income on a straight

line basis over 40 years. Goodwill is evaluated annually and is written down when the undiscounted

future earnings of the related business is less than its carrying amount.

I N C O M E   T A X E S The Company follows the deferral method of applying the tax allocation basis of

accounting for income taxes.

P R I O R   Y E A R   C O M P A R A T I V E S Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the

1998 presentation.

4 5

[2] R E N T A L   E Q U I P M E N T

Rental equipment
Less accumulated depreciation

1 9 9 8

1 9 9 7

$ 387,723
(119,690)

$ 337,016
(114,168)

$ 268,033

$ 222,848

Depreciation of rental equipment for the year ended December 31, 1998 was $70,659 (1997:

$60,750).

I N S T A L M E N T   N O T E S   R E C E I V A B L E

[3]
Instalment notes receivable are recorded net of unearned finance charges and include $47,505 due

after one year (1997: $87,031).

[4] E Q U I P M E N T   L E A S E D   T O   C U S T O M E R S

Cost
Less accumulated depreciation

1 9 9 8

1 9 9 7

$ 442,620
(124,930)

$ 434,045
(120,512)

$ 317,690

$ 313,533

Depreciation of equipment leased to customers for the year ended December 31, 1998 was

$91,177 (1997: $113,338).

[5] L A N D , B U I L D I N G S   A N D   E Q U I P M E N T

Land

Buildings and equipment
Less accumulated depreciation

1 9 9 8

1 9 9 7

$

54,090

$

51,124

368,266
(186,290)

337,106
(168,723)

181,976

168,383

$ 236,066

$ 219,507

Depreciation of buildings and equipment for the year ended December 31, 1998 was $27,791

(1997: $23,445).

[6] G O O D W I L L

Purchased goodwill

P U R C H A S E D   D U R I N G   T H E   Y E A R :
H. Leverton Limited
Interior Lift Truck

Accumulated amortization

1 9 9 8

1 9 9 7

$

88,619

$

54,628

—
—

—

88,619
(12,056)

33,428
563

33,991

88,619
(9,852)

$

76,563

$

78,767

F I N N I N G  I N T E R N A T I O N A L  I N C .

4 6

[7] S H O R T - T E R M   D E B T

Loans
Commercial paper and bankers’ acceptances

1 9 9 8

1 9 9 7

$ 214,008
394,966

$ 278,389
339,629

$ 608,974

$ 618,018

The Company has entered into interest rate swap agreements which fix the semi-annual interest

rate on $73,213 (1997: $89,070) of debt at a weighted average interest rate of 5.60% (1997: 6.06%).

Agreements for $44,360 (1997: $50,463) extend beyond one year for varying periods up to January

2002 at an average interest rate of 5.47% (1997: 5.92%).

[8] T E R M   D E B T

Fixed rate loan at 7.675%, maturing May 8, 2002, of £25,000 (unsecured) $
Floating rate loan bearing a semi-annual interest rate of 7.63%

at December 31, 1998 (1997: 8.52%), maturing June 22, 2000, 
of £25,000 (unsecured)

Floating rate loan bearing a quarterly interest rate of 7.305% 

1 9 9 8

1 9 9 7

63,620

$

58,680

63,620

58,680

at December 31, 1998, maturing May 25, 2003, of £15,000 (unsecured)

38,172

—

Series A Senior Debentures at 8.35% with interest payable 

semi-annually, maturing March 22, 2004 (unsecured)

75,000

75,000

Series B Senior Debentures at 6.60% with interest payable 
semi-annually, maturing December 8, 2006 (unsecured)
Term bank loans bearing interest at floating rates which at

December 31, 1998 averaged 5.48% (1997: 4.65%). These loans
are repayable May 31, 2001 and December 31, 2002 (unsecured)

Other loans denominated in U.S. dollars and Chilean pesos, maturing

between 1999 and 2004 (unsecured)

Term loans due within one year

75,000

75,000

134,649

179,859

73,100

73,984

$ 523,161

$ 521,203

$

1,071

$

6,362

Interest expense in 1998, on indebtedness incurred for a period greater than one year, was

$38,795 (1997: $28,845).

Estimated principal repayments for the next five years are:
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003

1,071
113,185
71,476
142,331
41,883

$

4 7

[9] F I N A N C I A L   I N S T R U M E N T S
The following table reflects the carrying value and estimated fair value of the Company’s financial

instruments:

F I N A N C I A L   I N S T R U M E N T S :
Notes receivable

$

99,930

$

99,983

$ 201,721

$ 202,958

Short-term debt and term debt

$ 1,132,135

$ 1,142,856

$ 1,139,221

$ 1,153,390

BOOK VALUE

MARKET VALUE

BOOK VALUE

MARKET VALUE

1 9 9 8

1 9 9 7

O F F   B A L A N C E   S H E E T   H E D G E S :
Interest rate swaps

Forward exchange contracts

NOTIONAL VALUE

MARKET VALUE

NOTIONAL VALUE

MARKET VALUE

1 9 9 8

1 9 9 7

$

$

73,213

22,655

$

$

73,770

22,527

$

$

89,070

20,767

$

$

90,269

20,435

Financial instruments that subject the Company to credit risk are notes receivable, short-term

and term debt, and hedges such as interest rate swaps and forward exchange contracts. At the

balance sheet dates there were no significant concentrations of credit risk from exposure to single

debtors. The Company’s hedges are contracted with high quality financial institutions as counter-

parties and, as a result, concentration of risk exposure is limited.

[10] S H A R E   C A P I T A L

A U T H O R I Z E D
Unlimited

Unlimited

Preferred shares without par value of which 4,400,000 are designated as Cumulative
Redeemable Convertible Preferred shares
Common shares

I S S U E D   A N D   O U T S T A N D I N G
99,600
79,427,879

Preferred shares, Series E (1997: 116,550)
Common shares (1997: 79,090,612)

1 9 9 8

1 9 9 7

$

996
207,583

$

1,166
204,425

$ 208,579

$ 205,591

C H A N G E S   D U R I N G   1 9 9 7 At the Company’s annual meeting in April 1997, the shareholders approved

the subdivision of the Company’s common shares on a two-for-one basis.

C O M M O N   S H A R E S A shareholders’ rights plan is in place which is intended to provide all holders of

common shares with the opportunity to receive full and fair value for all of their shares in the event

a third party attempts to acquire a significant interest in the Company. The Company’s dealership

agreements with subsidiaries of Caterpillar Inc. are fundamental to its business and any change in

control must be approved by Caterpillar.

The plan provides that one share purchase right has been issued for each common share and

will trade with the common shares until such time as any person or group, other than a permitted

bidder, bids to acquire or acquires 20% or more of the Company’s common shares. The rights will

then separate and will ultimately entitle each holder of common shares (other than the bidder) to

purchase common shares of the Company at a 50% discount to the then market price. The rights may

also be triggered by a third party proposal for merger, amalgamation or a similar transaction. The rights

will expire on September 13, 1999 unless redeemed earlier by the Board of Directors.

F I N N I N G  I N T E R N A T I O N A L  I N C .

4 8

The plan will not be triggered if a bid meets certain criteria (a permitted bidder). These criteria

include that: (1) the offer is made for all outstanding voting shares of the Company; (2) more than 50% of

the voting shares have been tendered by independent shareholders pursuant to the Takeover Bid (voting

shares tendered may be withdrawn until taken up and paid for); and (3) the Takeover Bid expires not less

than 75 days after the date of the bid circular.

A summary of the changes in common shares are as follows:

Balance, beginning of year
Conversion of 16,950 Series E

(1997: 31,450) preferred shares

Exercise of stock options

1 9 9 8

1 9 9 7

S H A R E S

A M O U N T

S H A R E S

A M O U N T

79,090,612

$ 204,425

78,546,950

$ 200,090

26,611
310,656

170
2,988

49,370
494,292

315
4,020

Balance, end of year

79,427,879

$ 207,583

79,090,612

$ 204,425

During 1997, the Company acquired 82,828 common shares in the open market for cash consideration of

$1,325 that were subsequently cancelled. The Company reissued 82,828 common shares valued at

$1,325 for the acquisition of the Interior Lift Truck group of companies (Note 15).

P R E F E R R E D   S H A R E S

S E R I E S   E   P R E F E R R E D   S H A R E S These preferred shares were issued under terms of an employee and

director share purchase plan and are redeemable by the Company at its option or retractable at the

option of the holder at the issue price.

The cumulative preferential cash dividends on the preferred shares are payable quarterly

based on the prime interest rate of a specified Canadian chartered bank. The applicable rate for

the preferred shares, and price at which the preferred shares are convertible into common shares,

is as follows:

Series E

D I V I D E N D  R AT E  A S  
A  %  O F  T H E  P R I M E  
I N T E R E S T  R AT E

C O N V E R S I O N
P R I C E

80% of prime

$

6.3675

In 1999, the conversion rights of the preferred shares will expire.

S T O C K   O P T I O N S

The Company has several stock option plans for employees and directors, the details of which are

as follows:

1 9 9 8
Options outstanding, beginning of year
Issued
Exercised

Options outstanding, end of year

S H A R E S

O P T I O N  P R I C E

4,124,890
1,327,439
(310,656)

5,141,673

$ 5.49 to $15.17
$17.00
$ 6.63 to $15.17

$ 5.49 to $17.00

A total of 2,943,211 options were exercisable at December 31, 1998 with the remaining options

outstanding exercisable at various times to February 2, 2008.

4 9

[11] C U M U L A T I V E   C U R R E N C Y   T R A N S L A T I O N   A D J U S T M E N T S

Balance, beginning of year
Gain realized during the year
Translation adjustments for the year

Balance, end of year

1 9 9 8

1 9 9 7

$

$

10,472
(2,701)
2,199

11,277
(1,888)
1,083

$

9,970

$

10,472

Translation gains or losses on the consolidation of foreign subsidiaries financial statements are

accumulated in this account. Translation adjustments arise as a result of fluctuations in foreign

currency exchange rates. At December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, the Canadian dollar exchange

rates against the British pound were 2.5448, 2.3472 and 2.3454, respectively, and the Chilean peso

exchange rates against the Canadian dollar were 308, 299 and 310, respectively.

During 1998, a dividend of £10,000 (1997: £10,000) was paid from Finning Holdings Limited

(U.K.) to the Company which generated a foreign exchange gain of $2,701 (1997: $1,888).

[12] P E N S I O N   P L A N S
The Company’s obligations for pension benefits, under its defined benefit plans at December 31, 1998,

were estimated by the plans’ actuaries to be $329,299 (1997: $299,875). Pension plan assets at

December 31, 1998, on an adjusted market value basis, were $369,118 (1997: $335,919).

[13] P R O V I S I O N   F O R   I N C O M E   T A X E S

Current
Deferred

Provision for income taxes

The Company’s provision for income taxes is determined as follows:

Combined federal and provincial income tax rates

Provision for income taxes based on the combined

federal and provincial rates

Increase (decrease) in provision for income taxes resulting from:
Lower effective rates on the losses (earnings) of foreign subsidiaries
Benefit of unrecognized tax loss carryforward of foreign subsidiary
Amortization of goodwill and increase in assigned asset value
Large corporation tax
Income not subject to tax
Other items

1 9 9 8

1 9 9 7

$

$

17,528
(13,163)

4,365

$

$

53,013
(7,357)

45,656

1 9 9 8

1 9 9 7

43.73%

43.59%

$

3,302

$

65,102

3,321
(514)
760
1,530
(1,421)
(2,613)

(12,210)
(2,930)
755
1,108
(3,237)
(2,932)

Provision for income taxes

$

4,365

$

45,656

The Company’s subsidiary, Finning Chile S.A., has a tax loss carryforward of $103,000 (1997:

$111,000), denominated in local currency, available to offset future taxable income. This loss was

acquired on acquisition of the company in August 1993. These losses are indexed to Chile’s inflation

rate which was 4.5% in 1998 and have no expiry date.

F I N N I N G  I N T E R N A T I O N A L  I N C .

5 0

[14] E A R N I N G S   P E R   S H A R E
Earnings per share has been calculated using the weighted average number of common shares

outstanding during each year. Fully diluted earnings per share has been calculated on the assumption

that all the outstanding preferred shares were converted and all outstanding stock options were

exercised at the beginning of the year.

[15] A C Q U I S I T I O N S
During 1997, the Company made the following acquisitions:

( 1 ) Effective October 1, 1997, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding share capital of

H. Leverton Limited, the Caterpillar dealer for the north, east and southeast regions of England.

The purchase makes the Company the sole dealer for Caterpillar equipment in Britain. The purchase

price was comprised of cash consideration of $26,807 (£12,029) in respect of common shares, the

assumption of short-term debt of $86,292 (£38,722), and $22,555 (£10,120) in planned restructuring

and acquisition costs.

( 2 ) Effective May 12, 1997, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding share capital of Interior

Lift Truck Services Inc., Interior Lift Truck Services (Vernon) Inc. and Interior Lift Truck Services

(Penticton) Inc. The Interior Lift Truck group sells, rents and services materials handling and high-

reach equipment, primarily in the Interior of British Columbia. Total consideration was $2,119,

comprised of 82,828 shares of the Company valued at $1,325 and cash consideration and acquisition

costs totalling $794.

The acquisitions have been accounted for using the purchase method and, accordingly, the

purchase price was allocated to the assets and liabilities based on their estimated fair values as of

the acquisition date. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired

has been recorded as goodwill and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over 40 years. The

results of operations related to the acquisitions have been included in these Consolidated Financial

Statements from the effective date of acquisition.

5 1

[15] A C Q U I S I T I O N S   ( C O N T I N U E D )

Net assets acquired at assigned values:

Accounts receivable
Inventories
Other assets
Land, buildings and equipment

Short-term debt
Accounts and income taxes payable

and accruals

Deferred income taxes
Term debt

Net assets acquired at estimated fair value
Goodwill

H .  L E V E RT O N
L I M I T E D

I N T E R I O R  
L I F T  T R U C K

$

$

68,907
80,641
865
18,648

169,061

478
1,399
9
337

2,223

$

T O TA L

69,385
82,040
874
18,985

171,284

(86,292)

(299)

(86,591)

(65,685)
(1,150)
—

(153,127)

15,934
33,428

(312)
(2)
(54)

(667)

1,556
563

(65,997)
(1,152)
(54)

(153,794)

17,490
33,991

Consideration

$

49,362

$

2,119

$

51,481

[16] E C O N O M I C   R E L A T I O N S H I P S
The Company distributes and services heavy equipment and related products. The Company has

dealership agreements with numerous equipment manufacturers, of which the most significant are

with subsidiaries of Caterpillar Inc. Distribution and servicing of Caterpillar products account for

the major portion of the Company’s operations. Finning has a strong relationship with Caterpillar

that has been ongoing since 1933.

[17] S E G M E N T E D   I N F O R M A T I O N
The Company and its subsidiaries have operated primarily in one industry during the year, that being

the selling, servicing and financing of heavy equipment and related products.

Operating units serve the following geographic areas: (1) Canadian operations: British Columbia,

Alberta, the western part of the Northwest Territories and Yukon; (2) U.K. operations: England, Scot-

land, Wales and the Channel Islands; (3) Chilean operations: throughout the country; and (4) Inter-

national operations: this segment represents the sale of used equipment and used parts worldwide

and the expenses associated with the corporate head office.

F I N N I N G  I N T E R N A T I O N A L  I N C .

5 2

The reportable geographic segments are:

S E G M E N T

C A N A D A

U . K .

C H I L E

I N T E R N AT I O N A L

S E G M E N T  
E L I M I N AT I O N S

C O N S O L I D AT E D

1 9 9 8
Revenue from
external sources

Earnings (loss) 
before interest 
and taxes
Finance costs
and interest 
on other
indebtedness
Provision for 
(recovery of) 
income taxes

$ 1,136,917

$ 794,356

$ 503,505

$ 151,979

$

(1,336) $ 2,585,421

85,434

(30,429)

25,415

2,309

—

82,729

35,194

12,613

21,991

5,381

15,493

(10,831)

—

(297)

—

—

75,179

4,365

Net income (loss) $

34,747

$

(32,211) $

3,424

$

(2,775) $

— $

3,185

Identifiable
assets

Capital
expenditures

Depreciation and
amortization of
capital assets 
and goodwill

1 9 9 7
Revenue from
external sources

Earnings before
interest
and taxes
Finance costs
and interest
on other
indebtedness
Provision for
income taxes

Net income

Identifiable
assets

Capital
expenditures

Depreciation and
amortization of
capital assets 
and goodwill

5 3

$ 1,303,092

$ 464,770

$ 354,029

$ 378,661

$ (270,951) $ 2,229,601

$

29,332

$

6,778

$

8,066

$

— $

— $

44,176

$ 147,548

$

19,471

$

23,315

$

1,497

$

— $ 191,831

$ 1,146,406

$ 567,365

$ 514,068

$ 102,942

$

(3,717) $ 2,327,064

124,035

47,049

38,695

6,846

—

216,625

29,317

15,771

19,160

3,026

33,050

11,168

—

1,438

—

—

67,274

45,656

$

61,668

$

20,110

$

19,535

$

2,382

$

— $ 103,695

$ 1,337,637

$ 510,100

$ 386,621

$ 322,844

$ (205,325) $ 2,351,877

$

15,250

$

9,135

$

22,763

$

— $

— $

47,148

$ 153,186

$

25,257

$

19,578

$

1,098

$

— $ 199,119

[18] Y E A R   2 0 0 0   I S S U E
The “Year 2000 Issue” is a general term used to refer to certain business implications of the

arrival of the new millennium. In simple terms, these implications arise largely because it has

been normal practice for computer hardware and software to use only two digits rather than four to

record the year in date fields. On January 1, 2000, when the year is designated as “00”, many com-

puter systems could either fail completely or create erroneous data as a result of misinterpretation

of the year.

Finning has been planning for the year 2000 since the mid-to-late eighties. The core systems in

all three dealerships have now been replaced by Caterpillar’s Dealer Business System version 2.0,

which is year 2000 compliant. All future software developed in-house and acquired externally will

be year 2000 compliant. A simulation test of the year 2000 was performed on the Company’s systems

in 1998. The test was successful and Finning intends to re-test all systems before the end of 1999.

While it is not possible to test every aspect of the Year 2000 Issue affecting the Company, such

as supplier systems, the Company does not expect this issue to be material to Finning’s financial

position or results of operations.

F I N N I N G  I N T E R N A T I O N A L  I N C .

5 4

T W O   Y E A R   S U M M A R Y  
B Y   Q U A R T E R

F I S C A L  P E R I O D

1 9 9 8
1st quarter
2nd quarter
3rd quarter
4th quarter

1 9 9 7
1st quarter
2nd quarter
3rd quarter
4th quarter

R E V E N U E
( $  T H O U S A N D S )

N E T  I N C O M E)1
( $  T H O U S A N D S )

B A S I C  ( $ )

F U L LY
D I L U T E D  ( $ )

D I V I D E N D  ( $ )

C L O S I N G
S T O C K  P R I C E  ( $ )

E A R N I N G S  P E R  C O M M O N  S H A R E

689,156
748,680
582,267
565,318

(7,843)
20,229
3,659
(12,860)

2,585,421

3,185

504,355
561,229
554,609
706,871

22,502
23,013
32,701
25,479

2,327,604

103,695

(0.10)
0.25
0.05
(0.16)

0.04

0.29
0.29
0.42
0.32

1.32

(0.10)
0.25
0.05
(0.16)

0.04

0.28
0.27
0.40
0.31

1.27

0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05

0.20

0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05

0.20

15.75
13.40
11.80
10.95

15.33
16.30
19.15
18.00

1 In 1997, $13.2 million in non-recurring gains were realized during the year. In 1998, $15.5 million in non-recurring charges were taken during the year.

S E G M E N T E D  
I N F O R M A T I O N

T W E LV E  M O N T H S  E N D E D  D E C E M B E R  3 1  ( $  T H O U S A N D S )  

1 9 9 8

1 9 9 7

1 9 9 6

1 9 9 5

R E V E N U E
Canadian operations
U.K. operations
Chilean operations
International operations

Consolidated

N E T   I N C O M E
Canadian operations
U.K. operations
Chilean operations
International operations

Consolidated

$ 1,136,917
793,020
503,505
151,979

$ 1,146,406
565,376
514,068
101,214

$ 926,653
437,949
408,616
101,491

$ 923,275
416,034
350,650
62,032

$ 2,585,421

$ 2,327,064

$ 1,874,709

$ 1,751,991

$

$

34,747
(32,211)
3,424
(2,775)

61,668
20,110
19,535
2,382

$

$

40,776
26,308
17,746
3,354

42,509
20,800
12,849
1,335

$

3,185

$ 103,695

$

88,184

$

77,493

5 5

T E N   Y E A R  
F I N A N C I A L   S U M M A R Y

Y E A R S  E N D E D  D E C E M B E R  3 1  ( $  T H O U S A N D S  E X C E P T  P E R  S H A R E  D ATA )

1 9 9 8

1 9 9 7

1 9 9 6

R E V E N U E
Revenue from Canadian operations
Revenue from U.K. operations
Revenue from Chilean operations
Revenue from International operations

I N C O M E   B E F O R E   P R O V I S I O N   F O R   I N C O M E   T A X E S
As a percent of revenue

N E T   I N C O M E
As a percent of revenue

E A R N I N G S   P E R   C O M M O N   S H A R E
Basic
Fully diluted

D I V I D E N D S
Total common share
Per common share

C O M M O N   S H A R E S   O U T S T A N D I N G ( T H O U S A N D S )

R E V E N U E   P E R   E M P L O Y E E

N E T   I N C O M E   P E R   E M P L O Y E E

R E T U R N   O N   A V E R A G E   S H A R E H O L D E R S ’   E Q U I T Y

G R O S S   C A P I T A L   E X P E N D I T U R E S

C A S H   F L O W
Cash flow per share

R A T I O S
Asset turnover ratio
Debt to equity
Liabilities to equity
Debt to equity (excluding finance operation)1

B O O K   V A L U E   P E R   C O M M O N   S H A R E

C O M M O N   S H A R E   P R I C E
High
Low

N U M B E R   O F   E M P L O Y E E S
Canada
U.K.
Chile
International

Total

$ 1,136,917
793,020
503,505
151,979

$ 1,146,406
565,376
514,068
101,214

$ 926,653
437,949
408,616
101,491

$ 2,585,421

$ 2,327,064

$ 1,874,709

$

$

$
$

7,550
0.3%
3,185
0.1%

$ 149,351
6.4%
$ 103,695
4.5%

$ 128,503
6.9%
88,184
4.7%

$

0.04
0.04

$
$

1.32
1.27

$
$

1.13
1.09

$
$

15,868
0.20
79,426
$ 492,367
606
$
0.5%

$
$

15,761
0.20
79,091
$ 475,570
22,119
$
16.2%

$
$

15,600
0.20
78,547
$ 441,940
20,788
$
16.0%

44,176
$
$ 226,168
2.85
$

47,148
$
$ 316,731
4.00
$

43,132
$
$ 244,909
3.12
$

$

$
$

1.13
1.67:1
2.29:1
0.97:1

0.99
1.66:1
2.37:1
0.90:1

1.04
1.50:1
1.97:1
0.59:1

8.52

$

8.69

$

7.59

18.50
10.25

$
$

20.50
14.43

$
$

14.58
9.75

2,494
1,348
1,354
55

5,251

2,496
1,720
1,228
50

5,494

2,269
925
1,008
40

4,242

Financial data has been restated to incorporate common share subdivisions occurring during the ten year period and to reflect a retroactive 
change in accounting for revenue recognition for exchange components implemented in 1992.
1 Assumes a debt to equity ratio of 7:1 in the finance operation and 5:1 in the rental operation. The debt to equity ratio has been restated to 
reflect a retroactive change in presenting customer rental-purchase contracts as finance assets implemented in 1996.

F I N N I N G  I N T E R N A T I O N A L  I N C .

5 6

1 9 9 5

1 9 9 4

1 9 9 3

1 9 9 2

1 9 9 1

1 9 9 0

1 9 8 9

$ 923,275
416,034
350,650
62,032

$ 838,680
338,499
241,221
39,138

$ 675,490
258,235
74,464
34,768

$ 553,316
251,909
—
27,512

$ 583,542
267,828
—
—

$ 727,321
319,727
—
—

$ 542,083
335,371
—
—

$1,751,991

$1,457,538

$1,042,957

$ 832,737

$ 851,370

$1,047,048

$ 877,454

$ 119,392
6.8%
77,493
4.4%

$

$
$

1.00
0.98

$

$

$
$

95,488
6.6%
61,421
4.2%

0.80
0.78

$

$

$
$

35,895
3.4%
22,271
2.1%

0.30
0.30

$

$

$
$

1,728
0.2%
2,878
0.3%

0.03
0.03

$

$

$
$

3,139
0.4%
4,612
0.5%

0.05
0.05

$

$

$
$

43,889
4.2%
30,283
2.9%

0.44
0.43

$

$

$
$

67,885
7.7%
42,197
4.8%

0.70
0.68

$
$

15,451
0.20
77,442
$ 428,674
18,961
$
16.2%

$
$

9,985
0.13
77,026
$ 374,978
15,802
$
14.8%

$
$

6,592
0.09
76,266
$ 283,875
6,062
$
6.5%

$
$

5,042
0.08
67,370
$ 281,425
973
$
0.9%

$
$

6,844
0.10
67,056
$ 260,757
1,413
$
1.4%

$
$

15,286
0.23
66,640
$ 289,480
8,372
$
9.8%

$
$

11,826
0.20
66,196
$ 240,267
11,554
$
17.1%

25,812
$
$ 209,827
2.71
$

16,641
$
$ 176,764
2.30
$

13,752
$
$ 116,371
1.53
$

$
$
$

7,025
94,546
1.40

11,643
$
$ 102,180
1.52
$

26,116
$
$ 114,467
1.72
$

24,516
$
$ 112,542
1.70
$

1.09
1.55:1
2.11:1
0.61:1

1.06
1.35:1
1.99:1
0.43:1

0.95
1.23:1
1.80:1
0.39:1

0.86
1.59:1
2.03:1
0.66:1

0.92
1.46:1
1.95:1
0.56:1

1.07
1.63:1
2.09:1
0.87:1

1.19
1.41:1
1.98:1
0.71:1

6.55

$

5.83

$

5.00

$

4.58

$

4.79

$

4.79

$

4.50

11.63
8.63

$
$

12.06
9.19

$
$

10.88
5.88

$
$

7.25
5.25

$
$

7.82
5.88

$
$

8.50
5.13

$
$

7.88
5.00

2,228
884
941
34

4,087

2,124
873
861
29

3,887

2,025
863
759
27

3,674

2,004
930
—
25

2,959

2,142
1,123
—
—

3,265

2,531
1,086
—
—

3,617

2,563
1,089
—
—

3,652

$

$
$

5 7

F I N A N C I A L
P E R F O R M A N C E

EARNINGS 
PER SHARE ( $ )
( 1 2 2 ÷ 1 . 2 7 = 9 6 . 0 6 )

98
97
96
95

0.04
1.27
1.09
0.98

Earnings per share on a fully diluted basis is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted

average number of common shares outstanding during the year (assuming that all outstanding

preferred shares were converted and all outstanding stock options were exercised at the beginning

of the year).

CASH FLOW 
PER SHARE ($)
(122÷4=30.5)

98
97
96
95

2.85
4.00
3.12
2.71

Cash flow per share is calculated by dividing cash generated from operations (excluding changes in

operating assets and liabilities) by the total number of shares outstanding at the end of the year. In

1998, cash flow per share decreased by 29% compared with the previous year.

DIVIDENDS 
PER SHARE ($)
(122÷.2=610)

98
97
96
95

0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20

In setting the dividend payment per common share, the Board of Directors considers the Company’s

recent and projected earnings and capital investment requirements and its total return to share-

holders. In 1998, the common dividend was maintained at $0.20 per share for a total annual payout

of $16 million.

RETURN ON
SHAREHOLDERS‘
EQUITY ($)
(122÷16.2=7.53)

98
97
96
95

0.5
16.2
16.0
16.2

The return on shareholders‘ equity is calculated by dividing net income by the average share-

holders’ equity during the year (including share capital, retained earnings and cumulative currency

translation adjustments).

TOTAL 
SHAREHOLDER
RETURNS ($) 
FINNING 
TSE 300 INDEX
(54÷99=.545)

$100

93

$166

$125

98

The graph above compares the yearly percentage change in the Company’s cumulative total

return on its common shares (annual stock price change plus dividends) with the cumulative total

return of the TSE 300 index. Based on $100 invested in 1993, Finning’s cumulative total return

over the five-year period was $125 compared with $166 for the TSE 300 index.

F I N N I N G  I N T E R N A T I O N A L  I N C .

5 8

S H A R E H O L D E R
I N F O R M A T I O N

S T O C K   E X C H A N G E S

C O R P O R A T E   I N F O R M A T I O N

The common shares of Finning International Inc.

The Company’s head office is located at 555

are listed on both the Toronto and Montreal

Great Northern Way, Vancouver, BC, Canada,

stock exchanges. (Symbol: FTT)

A U D I T O R S

Arthur Andersen LLP

Chartered Accountants, Vancouver, BC, Canada

S O L I C I T O R S

Ladner Downs

V5T  1E2.  The  Company  prepares  an  Annual

Information Form (AIF) which is filed with the

securities commissions or similar bodies in all

of the provinces of Canada. Copies of the AIF

and Annual and Quarterly Reports are available

to shareholders and other interested parties on

request  or  can  be  accessed  directly  from

Barristers and Solicitors, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Finning’s home page on the Internet at:

R E G I S T R A R   A N D   T R A N S F E R   A G E N T

Montreal Trust Company of Canada

http://www.finning.ca.

I N V E S T O R   R E L A T I O N S

510 Burrard Street

Vancouver, BC V6C 3B9

Tel (604) 661-9400

A N N U A L   M E E T I N G

The Annual Meeting of the shareholders will be

held at 11:00 a.m., April 23, 1999 at The King

Edward Hotel in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Inquiries relating to shares or dividends should

be directed to the Company’s Registrar and Trans-

fer Agent. Inquiries relating to the Company’s

operating activities and financial information

should be addressed to:

David Climie

Director, Investor and Corporate Relations 

Tel (604) 331-4885, Fax (604) 331-4899

E-mail dclimie@finning.ca

S T O C K  
P E R F O R M A N C E   ( $ )   144÷18.5=5.838

This graph indicates the high and low closing stock prices for each month in 1998. The black lines

indicate the closing price at the end of each month.

1998 
MONTHLY
STOCK PRICE ($) 

0
5

.

8
1

5
7

.

4
1

5
2

.

8
1

0
0

.

6
1

0
5

.

8
1

0
7

.

5
1

0
8

.

5
1

5
1

.

4
1

5
3

.

5
1

5
7

.

4
1

5
9

.

4
1

5
9

.

2
1

5
7

.

4
1

0
1

.

3
1

5
2

.

4
1

0
0

.

2
1

5
2

.

3
1

0
4

.

1
1

5
2

.

2
1

0
5

.

1
1

5
2

.

3
1

0
5

.

1
1

J

F

M

A

M

J

J

A

S

O

N

0
0

.

2
1

5
2

.

0
1

D

5 9

D I R E C T O R S ,   O F F I C E R S  
A N D   C O M M I T T E E S

B O A R D   O F   D I R E C T O R S

O F F I C E R S

A U D I T   C O M M I T T E E

J . F.  S h e p a r d
C H A I R M A N  A N D  
C H I E F  E X E C U T I V E  O F F I C E R  
F I N N I N G  I N T E R N AT I O N A L  I N C .

C . A .  C e d e r b e r g
P R E S I D E N T  A N D  
C H I E F  E X E C U T I V E  O F F I C E R
F I N N I N G  C H I L E  S . A .

D . F.  E d w a r d s
E X E C U T I V E  V I C E  P R E S I D E N T
S T R AT E G I C  D E V E L O P M E N T
F I N N I N G  I N T E R N AT I O N A L  I N C .

A . R .  G u g l i e l m i n
C O R P O R AT E  T R E A S U R E R
F I N N I N G  I N T E R N AT I O N A L  I N C .

H . M .  H o
E X E C U T I V E  V I C E  P R E S I D E N T
H U M A N  R E S O U R C E S
F I N N I N G  I N T E R N AT I O N A L  I N C .

N . B .  L l o y d
M A N A G I N G  D I R E C T O R
F I N N I N G  ( U K )  LT D .

R . T.  M a h l e r
E X E C U T I V E  V I C E  P R E S I D E N T  
A N D  C H I E F  F I N A N C I A L  O F F I C E R  
F I N N I N G  I N T E R N AT I O N A L  I N C .

I . M .  R e i d
P R E S I D E N T  A N D  
C H I E F  O P E R AT I N G  O F F I C E R  
F I N N I N G  ( C A N A D A )

J . T.  S t r u t h e r s
C O R P O R AT E  S E C R E TA R Y  

F I N N I N G  I N T E R N AT I O N A L  I N C .

D . W. G .  W h i t e h e a d
P R E S I D E N T  A N D  
C H I E F  O P E R AT I N G  O F F I C E R
F I N N I N G  I N T E R N AT I O N A L  I N C .

M . N .  A n d e r s o n
P R E S I D E N T  
A N D E R S O N  &  A S S O C I AT E S  
VA N C O U V E R ,  B C

R .  B a c a r r e z a
P R E S I D E N T
P R O I N V E S T  S . A .
S A N T I A G O ,  C H I L E  

J . F.  D i n n i n g  
E X E C U T I V E  V I C E  P R E S I D E N T
E N E R G Y  M A R K E T I N G
T R A N S A LTA  E N E R G Y  C O R P.  
C A L G A R Y,  A L B E R TA

R . B .  H o u g e n
P R E S I D E N T  
H O U G E N ’ S  G R O U P  O F  C O M PA N I E S  
W H I T E H O R S E ,  Y U K O N

T. S .  H o w d e n
C O M PA N Y  D I R E C T O R  
M A R L O W ,  E N G L A N D

M . M .  K o e r n e r
P R E S I D E N T  
C A N A D A  O V E R S E A S  
I N V E S T M E N T S  L I M I T E D
T O R O N T O ,  O N TA R I O

N . B .  L l o y d
M A N A G I N G  D I R E C T O R
F I N N I N G  ( U K )  LT D .  
B E D N A L L ,  E N G L A N D

D . S .  O ’ S u l l i v a n
P R E S I D E N T  
O ’ S U L L I VA N  R E S O U R C E S  LT D .  
E D M O N T O N ,  A L B E R TA

C . A .  P i n e t t e
P R E S I D E N T  A N D  
C H I E F  O P E R AT I N G  O F F I C E R  
L I G N U M  L I M I T E D
VA N C O U V E R ,  B C

J . F.  S h e p a r d
C H A I R M A N  A N D  
C H I E F  E X E C U T I V E  O F F I C E R  
F I N N I N G  I N T E R N AT I O N A L  I N C .
VA N C O U V E R ,  B C

A . H .  S i m o n
C O M PA N Y  D I R E C T O R

L O N D O N ,  E N G L A N D  

W. R .  W y m a n
C H A I R M A N
S U N C O R  E N E R G Y  I N C .
W E S T  VA N C O U V E R ,  B C

M . M .  K o e r n e r
C H A I R M A N

J . F.  D i n n i n g

R . B .  H o u g e n

T. S .  H o w d e n

C . A .  P i n e t t e

W. R .  W y m a n

E N V I R O N M E N T A L ,   H E A L T H  
A N D   S A F E T Y   C O M M I T T E E

D . S .  O ’ S u l l i v a n
C H A I R M A N

T. S .  H o w d e n

C . A .  P i n e t t e

J . F.  S h e p a r d

P E N S I O N   C O M M I T T E E

H . M .  H o
C H A I R M A N

A . R .  G u g l i e l m i n

R . T.  M a h l e r

G O V E R N A N C E   C O M M I T T E E

C . A .  P i n e t t e
C H A I R M A N

M . N .  A n d e r s o n

M . M .  K o e r n e r

D . S .  O ’ S u l l i v a n

H U M A N   R E S O U R C E S   A N D  
C O M P E N S A T I O N   C O M M I T T E E

M . N .  A n d e r s o n
C H A I R M A N

D . S .  O ’ S u l l i v a n

J . F.  S h e p a r d

W. R .  W y m a n

F I N N I N G  I N T E R N A T I O N A L  I N C .

6 0

G
N

I

T
N

I

R
P

D
L
A
N
O
D
C
A
M

H

:

G
N

I

T
N

I

R
P

Y
T
N
U
O
B
A
L

S
E
M
A
J

:

Y
H
P
A
R
G
O
T
O
H
P

N
O
S
A
M
A
T
A
M
A
S

:

N
G

I

S
E
D

 
 
 
t
r
o
p
e
R

l
a
u
n
n
A

8
9
9
1

.
c
n

I

l
a
n
o

i
t
a
n
r
e
t
n

I

g
n

i

n
n

i
F

s
s
e
r
g
o
r
p

n

i

k
r
o
w

 
 
 
 
 
 
e
c
n
e
t
e
p
m
o
c

e
h
t

e
v
a
h

e
l

p
o
e
p

r
u
O

t
s
e
b

e
h
t

r
e
v
i
l
e
d

o
t

m
o
d
e
e
r
f

d
n
a

.
s
r
e
m
o
t
s
u
c

r
u
o

o
t

s
n
o

i
t
u

l

o
s

n
e
t
s
i

l

e
w

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
,
s
e
i
r
o
t
i
r
r
e
t

r
u
o

n

i

g
n

i
t
a
r
e
p
o

s
e
n

i

h
c
a
m

.
e
c
i
v
r
e
s

t
r
o
p
p
u
s

r
e
m
o
t
s
u
c

t
a

l
e
c
x
e

e
w

r
a
l
l
i

p
r
e
t
a
C

0
0
0

,

6
3

n
a
h
t

e
r
o
m
h
t
i

W

t
r
o
p
p
u
s

e
w

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
e
h
t

n

i

–

y
l
i
a
d

s
r
u
c
c
o

t
a
h
t

e
n
o

d
n
a

s
s
e
c
o
r
p

.

b
o

j

e
h
t

n
o

d
n
a
m
o
o
r
s
s
a
l
c

e
h
t

n

i

,

p
o
h
s

t
n
a
t
s
n
o
c

a

s
i

e
c
r
o
f
k
r
o
w

r
u
o

g
n

i

n

i
a
r
T

n

i
a
r
t

e
w

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
e
r
o
m
e
r
a
h
s

o
t

s
u

s
w
o

l
l
a

y
g
o

l

o
n
h
c
e
t

n
o

i
t
a
m

r
o
f
n

I

.
e
v
i
s
n
o
p
s
e
r

e
r
o
m
e
b

o
t

d
n
a

,
y
l
t
n
e
i

n
e
v
n
o
c

e
r
o
m

d
n
a

r
e
t
s
a
f

,
s
r
e
m
o
t
s
u
c

r
u
o

h
t
i

w

n
o

i
t
a
m

r
o
f
n

i

e
d
a
r
g
p
u

e
w

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
l
a
t
o
t

g
n

i
r
e
f
f
o

y
b

s
t
e
k
r
a
m
w
e
n

g
n

i

u
s
r
u
p

e
r
a

e
W

o
t

g
n

i

k
e
e
s

s
r
e
m
o
t
s
u
c

r
o
f

s
n
o

i
t
u

l

o
s

t
n
e
m
p

i

u
q
e

.
s
t
n
e
m
e
r
i

u
q
e
r

e
r
o
c
-

n
o
n

r
i
e
h
t

e
c
r
u
o
s
t
u
o

s
t
e
k
r
a
m

w
e
n

e
u
s
r
u
p

e
w

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
s
r
e
m
o
t
s
u
c

r
u
o

h
t
o
b

g
n

i

k
a
m
o
t

d
e
t
t
i

m
m
o
c

e
r
a

e
w

,
.
c
n

I

l
a
n
o

i
t
a
n
r
e
t
n

I

g
n

i

n
n

i
F

t
A

.
l

u
f
s
s
e
c
c
u
s

y
n
a
p
m
o
C

r
u
o

d
n
a