First Commonwealth Financial
Annual Report 2012

Plain-text annual report

Annual Report 2012 First Commonwealth Financial Corporation 601 Philadelphia Street Indiana, Pennsylvania 15701-0400 (724) 349.7220 (800) 711.BANK (2265) fcbanking.com A Message to Fellow Shareowners It has been one year since I assumed the role of President and CEO at First Commonwealth. In that year, my sense of stewardship to our shareholders, customers and employees has only grown, as has my belief in the potential of this company. A Year of Progress The past year has been a year of progress and renewal at First Commonwealth. Our 2012 net income grew to $42.0 million from $15.3 million in 2011. I am proud of the effort given and the results achieved by our dedicated team of community bankers. These results can be seen in a variety of financial metrics, as well as the increasing productivity of our lines of business. Highlights from 2012 include: • • • • • • • $161.1 million (4%) increase in loans $104.9 million (12%) increase in checking account deposits Customer satisfaction and household growth at all-time highs Continued progress in credit quality Emerging competitiveness of our retail and corporate bank Cultural transition to greater accountability and more transparency Dividend increase and stock repurchase program Community Banking Fundamentals The progress we have made over the past year is in large part a byproduct of our mission — To help our neighbors and the businesses within our communities realize their financial goals as a trusted partner and friend. Our talented team of corporate and retail bankers and wealth professionals is firmly engaged in our communities and thus has a keen understanding of emerging opportunities. We know our customers and prospects, and we have set out to become the best choice for businesses, their owners, and their employees among community banks. Collectively, we are establishing a competitive advantage in the small business and middle market segments. Our new loan originations in corporate banking were the strongest they have been in three years. Our middle market lending had a record year in new production. Our energy focus has enabled us to capitalize on opportunities related to Marcellus Shale. And our treasury management, syndications, and capital markets capabilities continue to differentiate us from our community bank competitors. Understanding & Anticipating Change Despite some solid accomplishments over the past year, we find ourselves in uniquely challenging times. The banking industry is in the midst of inherent change in terms of regulation, competition, and technology. The speed and span of change is more dramatic than I can remember at any time in my banking career. Fortunately, these same challenges present unprecedented opportunities. In order to seize these opportunities and overtake the competition, we must become markedly more efficient while broadening our revenue base. We need to work towards and deliver more consistent earnings results. And we must put lingering credit issues behind us. Most importantly, we can and will continue to win in the trenches with customers every day. Improving the Way We Do Business Our success going forward will require an openness and willingness to make transformational decisions. Incremental change, while important, is no longer enough to produce the necessary results. We are rethinking our basic approach towards technology, our branch network, and our business mix. I remain convinced that First Commonwealth can and will deliver best-in-class service that will ultimately translate into long-term value for our shareholders. We have taken positive steps in this direction over the course of 2012, with much more to be done in 2013. I look forward to keeping you updated on our progress, and I thank you for your ongoing support. T. Michael Price President and Chief Executive Officer First Commonwealth Financial Corporation UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K È ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 OR ‘ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file Number 001-11138 FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) PENNSYLVANIA (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) 601 PHILADELPHIA STREET INDIANA, PA (Address of principal executive offices) 25-1428528 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 15701 (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (724) 349-7220 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class COMMON STOCK, $1 PAR VALUE Name of each exchange on which registered NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ‘ No È Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ‘ No È Note—Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act from their obligations under those Sections. Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes È No ‘ Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this form 10-K. ‘ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes È No ‘ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer ‘ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ‘ No È The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock, par value $1 per share, held by non-affiliates of the registrant (based upon the closing sale price on June 30, 2012) was approximately $696,275,402. Accelerated filer È Non-accelerated filer ‘ Smaller reporting company ‘ The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, $1.00 Par Value as of March 7, 2013, was 99,298,120. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the annual meeting of shareholders to be held April 23, 2013 are incorporated by reference into Part III. FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES FORM 10-K INDEX PART I ITEM 1. Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM 1A. Risk Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM 2. Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Executive Officers of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PART II ITEM 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchase of Equity Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM 9A. Controls and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM 9B. Other Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PART III ITEM 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM 11. Executive Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence . . . . . . . . ITEM 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PART IV ITEM 15. Exhibits, Financial Statements and Schedules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Signatures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PAGE 4 13 17 17 17 17 17 19 22 23 49 50 123 123 123 124 124 124 125 125 126 128 FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Certain statements contained in this report that are not historical facts may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are intended to be covered by the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements include, among others, statements regarding our strategy, evaluations of our asset quality, future interest rate trends and liquidity, prospects for growth in assets and prospects for future operating results. Forward-looking statements can generally be identified by the use of words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate” or words of similar meaning, or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “would,” “should,” “could” or “may.” Forward-looking statements are based on assumptions of management and are only expectations of future results. You should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. Our actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of, among others, the risk factors described in Item 1A of this report. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made. We do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect circumstances or events that occur after the date the forward-looking statements are made. ITEM 1. Business Overview First Commonwealth Financial Corporation (“First Commonwealth” or “we”) is a financial holding company that is headquartered in Indiana, Pennsylvania. We provide a diversified array of consumer and commercial banking services through our bank subsidiary, First Commonwealth Bank (“FCB” or the “Bank”). We also provide trust and wealth management services and offer insurance products through FCB and our other operating subsidiaries. At December 31, 2012, we had total assets of $6.0 billion, total loans of $4.2 billion, total deposits of $4.6 billion and shareholders’ equity of $746.0 million. Our principal executive office is located at 601 Philadelphia Street, Indiana, Pennsylvania 15701, and our telephone number is (724) 349-7220. FCB is a Pennsylvania bank and trust company. At December 31, 2012, the Bank operated 112 community banking offices throughout western and central Pennsylvania and a loan production office in downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The largest concentration of our branch offices is located within the greater Pittsburgh metropolitan area in Allegheny, Butler, Washington and Westmoreland counties, while our remaining offices are located in smaller cities, such as Altoona, Johnstown, and Indiana, Pennsylvania, and in towns and villages throughout predominantly rural counties. The Bank also operates a network of 120 automated teller machines, or ATMs, at various branch offices and offsite locations. All of our ATMs are part of the NYCE and MasterCard/Cirrus networks, both of which operate nationwide. The Bank is a member of the Allpoint ATM network which allows surcharge-free access to over 50,000 ATMs. The Bank is also a member of the “Freedom ATM Alliance,” which affords cardholders surcharge-free access to a network of over 700 ATMs in over 50 counties in Pennsylvania, Maryland, New York, West Virginia and Ohio. Historical and Recent Developments FCB began in 1934 as First National Bank of Indiana with initial capitalization of $255 thousand. First National Bank of Indiana changed its name to National Bank of the Commonwealth in 1971 and became a subsidiary of First Commonwealth in 1983. Since the formation of the holding company in 1983, we have grown steadily through the acquisition of smaller banks and thrifts in our market area, including Deposit Bank in 1984, Dale National Bank and First National Bank of Leechburg in 1985, Citizens National Bank of Windber in 1986, Peoples Bank and Trust Company in 1990, Central Bank in 1992, Peoples Bank of Western Pennsylvania in 1993, Unitas National Bank and Reliable Savings Bank in 1994. In 1995, we merged all of our banking subsidiaries (other than Reliable Savings Bank) into Deposit Bank and renamed the resulting institution “First Commonwealth Bank.” We then merged Reliable Savings Bank into FCB in 1997. We acquired Southwest Bank in 1998 and merged it into FCB in 2002. In the fourth quarter of 2003, we acquired Pittsburgh Financial Corp., the holding company for Pittsburgh Savings Bank (dba BankPittsburgh), for a total cost of approximately $28.6 million. Pittsburgh Financial had total assets of approximately $376.4 million, with 7 branch offices and one loan production office in Allegheny and Butler counties of Pennsylvania. In the second quarter of 2004, we acquired GA Financial, Inc., the holding company for Great American Federal, for a total cost of approximately $176.7 million. GA Financial, Inc. had total assets of approximately $890.3 million, with 12 branch offices located in Allegheny County. In the third quarter of 2006, we acquired Laurel Capital Group, Inc. (“Laurel”), the holding company for Laurel Savings Bank, for a total cost of approximately $56.1 million. Laurel had total assets of approximately $314.3 million, with 8 branch offices located in Allegheny and Butler Counties. In recent years, we have primarily focused on organic growth, improving the reach of our franchise and the breadth of our product offering. As part of this strategy, we have opened fourteen de novo branches since 2005, all of which are in the greater Pittsburgh area. As a result of our acquisition and de novo strategy, FCB operates 49 branches in the Pittsburgh metropolitan statistical area and currently ranks ninth in deposit market share. 4 ITEM 1. Business (Continued) Competition The banking and financial services industry is extremely competitive in our market area. We face vigorous competition for customers, loans and deposits from many companies, including commercial banks, savings and loan associations, finance companies, credit unions, trust companies, mortgage companies, money market mutual funds, insurance companies, and brokerage and investment firms. Many of these competitors are significantly larger than us, have greater resources, lending limits and larger branch systems and offer a wider array of financial services than us. In addition, some of these competitors, such as credit unions, are subject to a lesser degree of regulation than that imposed on us. Employees At December 31, 2012, First Commonwealth and its subsidiaries employed 1,289 full-time employees and 193 part-time employees. Supervision and Regulation The following discussion sets forth the material elements of the regulatory framework applicable to financial holding companies and their subsidiaries and provides certain specific information relevant to First Commonwealth and its subsidiaries. The regulatory framework is intended primarily for the protection of depositors, other customers and the federal deposit insurance fund and not for the protection of security holders. The rules governing the regulation of financial institutions and their holding companies are very detailed and technical. Accordingly, the following discussion is general in nature and is not intended to be complete or to describe all the laws and regulations that apply to First Commonwealth and its subsidiaries. A change in applicable statutes, regulations or regulatory policy may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Regulatory Reforms The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), which was enacted in July 2010, significantly restructures the financial regulatory regime in the United States. Although the Dodd- Frank Act’s provisions that have received the most public attention generally have been those applying to or more likely to affect larger institutions such as bank holding companies with total consolidated assets of $50 billion or more, it contains numerous other provisions that affect all bank holding companies and banks, including First Commonwealth and FCB, some of which are described in more detail below. Many of the Dodd-Frank Act’s provisions are subject to final rulemaking by the U.S. financial regulatory agencies, and the implications of the Dodd-Frank Act for First Commonwealth’s businesses will depend to a large extent on how such rules are adopted and implemented by the primary U.S. financial regulatory agencies. First Commonwealth continues to analyze the impact of rules adopted under Dodd-Frank, on its businesses. However, the full impact will not be known until the rules, and other regulatory initiatives that overlap with the rules, are finalized and their combined impacts can be understood. Bank Holding Company Regulation First Commonwealth is registered as a financial holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (“BHC Act”), and is subject to supervision and regulation by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“FRB”). Acquisitions. Under the BHC Act, First Commonwealth is required to obtain the prior approval of the FRB before it can merge or consolidate with any other bank holding company or acquire all or substantially all of the assets of any bank that is not already majority owned by it or acquire direct or indirect ownership, or control of, 5 ITEM 1. Business (Continued) Supervision and Regulation (Continued) Bank Holding Company Regulation (Continued) any voting shares of any bank that is not already majority owned by it, if after such acquisition it would directly or indirectly own or control more than 5% of the voting shares of such bank. Satisfactory financial condition, particularly with regard to capital adequacy, and satisfactory Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) ratings are generally prerequisites to obtaining federal regulatory approval to make acquisitions and open branch offices. Non-Banking Activities. First Commonwealth is generally prohibited under the BHC Act from engaging in, or acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of any company engaged in non-banking activities unless the FRB, by order or regulation, has found such activities to be so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto. In making this determination, the FRB considers whether the performance of these activities by a bank holding company can reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public that outweigh the possible adverse effects. Reporting. Under the BHC Act, First Commonwealth is subject to examination by the FRB and is required to file periodic reports and other information of its operations with the FRB. In addition, under the Pennsylvania Banking Code of 1965, the Pennsylvania Department of Banking has the authority to examine the books, records and affairs of any Pennsylvania bank holding company or to require any documentation deemed necessary to ensure compliance with the Pennsylvania Banking Code. Source of Strength Doctrine. FRB policy has historically required bank holding companies to act as a source of financial and managerial strength to their subsidiary banks. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) codifies this policy as a statutory requirement. Under this requirement, First Commonwealth is expected to commit resources to support FCB, including at times when First Commonwealth may not be in a financial position to provide such resources. Any capital loans by a bank holding company to any of its subsidiary banks are subordinate in right of payment to deposits and to certain other indebtedness of such subsidiary banks. In the event of a bank holding company’s bankruptcy, any commitment by the bank holding company to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain the capital of a subsidiary bank will be assumed by the bankruptcy trustee and entitled to priority of payment. Affiliate Transactions. Transactions between FCB, on the one hand, and First Commonwealth and its other subsidiaries, on the other hand, are regulated by the Federal Reserve Board. These regulations limit the types and amounts of covered transactions engaged in by FCB and generally require those transactions to be on an arm’s- length basis. “Covered transactions” are defined by statute to include a loan or extension of credit, as well as a purchase of securities issued by an affiliate, a purchase of assets (unless otherwise exempted by the Federal Reserve Board) from the affiliate, certain derivative transactions that create a credit exposure to an affiliate, the acceptance of securities issued by the affiliate as collateral for a loan, and the issuance of a guarantee, acceptance or letter of credit on behalf of an affiliate. In general, these regulations require that any such transaction by FCB (or its subsidiaries) with an affiliate must be secured by designated amounts of specified collateral and must be limited to certain thresholds on an individual and aggregate basis. SEC Regulations. First Commonwealth is also under the jurisdiction of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and various state securities commissions for matters relating to the offer and sale of its securities and is subject to the SEC rules and regulations relating to periodic reporting, proxy solicitation and insider trading. Bank Regulations FCB is a state bank chartered under the Pennsylvania Banking Code and is not a member of the FRB. As such, FCB is subject to the supervision of, and is regularly examined by, both the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and is required to furnish quarterly reports 6 ITEM 1. Business (Continued) Supervision and Regulation (Continued) Bank Regulations (Continued) to both agencies. The approval of the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and FDIC is also required for FCB to establish additional branch offices or merge with or acquire another banking institution. Restrictions on Dividends. The Pennsylvania Banking Code states, in part, that dividends may be declared and paid only out of accumulated net earnings and may not be declared or paid unless surplus is at least equal to capital. Dividends may not reduce surplus without the prior consent of the Pennsylvania Department of Banking. FCB has not reduced its surplus through the payment of dividends. The FDIC also prohibits the declaration or payout of dividends at a time when FCB is in default in payment of any assessment due the FDIC. In addition, supervisory guidance issued by the FRB requires, among other things, that a company must consult with the FRB in advance of paying a dividend that exceeds earnings for the quarter for which the dividend is paid or that could result in a material adverse change to the company’s capital structure. The guidance also states that a company should, as a general matter, eliminate, defer or severely limit its dividend if (1) the company’s net income for the past four quarters, net of dividends paid during that period, is not sufficient to fully fund the dividend; (2) the company’s prospective rate of earnings retention is not consistent with the company’s capital needs and current and prospective financial condition; or (3) the company will not meet, or is in danger of not meeting, its minimum regulatory capital adequacy ratios. Community Reinvestment. Under the Community Reinvestment Act, or CRA, a bank has a continuing and affirmative obligation, consistent with its safe and sound operation, to help meet the credit needs of its entire community, including low and moderate income neighborhoods. The CRA does not establish specific lending requirements or programs for financial institutions nor does it limit an institution’s discretion to develop the types of products and services that it believes are best suited to its particular community, consistent with the CRA. The CRA requires the applicable regulatory agency to assess an institution’s record of meeting the credit needs of its community. The CRA requires public disclosure of an institution’s CRA rating and requires that the applicable regulatory agency provide a written evaluation of an institution’s CRA performance utilizing a four- tiered descriptive rating system. An institution’s CRA rating is considered in determining whether to grant charters, branches and other deposit facilities, relocations, mergers, consolidations and acquisitions. Performance less than satisfactory may be the basis for denying an application. For its most recent examination, FCB received a “satisfactory” rating. Consumer Protection Laws. The operations of FCB are also subject to numerous federal, state and local consumer protection laws and regulations including the Truth in Lending Act, Truth in Savings Act, Equal Credit Opportunity Act, Fair Housing Act, Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and Home Mortgage Disclosure Act. Among other things, these acts: require banks to disclose credit terms in meaningful and consistent ways; prohibit discrimination against an applicant in any consumer or business credit transaction; prohibit discrimination in housing-related lending activities; require banks to collect and report applicant and borrower data regarding loans for home purchases or improvement projects; require lenders to provide borrowers with information regarding the nature and cost of real estate settlements; prohibit certain lending practices and limit escrow account amounts with respect to real estate transactions; and prescribe possible penalties for violations of the requirements of consumer protection statutes and regulations. • • • • • • • 7 ITEM 1. Business (Continued) Supervision and Regulation (Continued) Bank Regulations (Continued) Deposit Insurance. Deposits of FCB are insured up to applicable limits by the FDIC and are subject to deposit insurance assessments to maintain the Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”). Deposit insurance assessments are based upon average total assets minus average total equity. The insurance assessments are based upon a matrix that takes into account a bank’s capital level and supervisory rating. The FDIC may terminate deposit insurance upon a finding that the institution has engaged in unsafe and unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations, or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the FDIC. In November 2009, the FDIC issued a rule that required all insured depository institutions, with limited exceptions, to prepay their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012. As of December 31, 2012, $9.2 million in pre-paid deposit insurance is included in “other assets” in the accompanying Statements of Financial Condition. In October 2010, the FDIC adopted a new DIF restoration plan to ensure that the fund reserve ratio reaches 1.35% by September 30, 2020, as required by the Dodd-Frank Act. At least semi-annually, the FDIC will update its loss and income projections for the fund and, if needed, will increase or decrease assessment rates, following notice-and-comment rulemaking if required. The separate deposit insurance coverage for non-interest-bearing transaction accounts that became effective on December 31, 2010 terminated on December 31, 2012. Capital Requirements As a bank holding company, we are subject to consolidated regulatory capital requirements administered by the FRB. FCB is subject to similar capital requirements administered by the FDIC and the Pennsylvania Department of Banking. The federal regulatory authorities’ risk-based capital guidelines are based upon the 1988 capital accord (“Basel I”) of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (the “Basel Committee”). The Basel Committee is a committee of central banks and bank supervisors/regulators from the major industrialized countries that develops broad policy guidelines for use by each country’s supervisors in determining the supervisory policies they apply. The requirements are intended to ensure that banking organizations have adequate capital given the risk levels of assets and off-balance sheet financial instruments. Under the requirements, banking organizations are required to maintain minimum ratios for Tier 1 capital and total capital to risk-weighted assets (including certain off-balance sheet items, such as letters of credit). For purposes of calculating the ratios, a banking organization’s assets and some of its specified off-balance sheet commitments and obligations are assigned to various risk categories. A depository institution’s or holding company’s capital, in turn, is classified in one of three tiers, depending on type: • • Core Capital (Tier 1). Tier 1 capital includes common equity, retained earnings, qualifying non- cumulative perpetual preferred stock, a limited amount of qualifying cumulative perpetual stock at the holding company level, minority interests in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, and qualifying trust preferred securities, less goodwill, most intangible assets and certain other assets. Supplementary Capital (Tier 2). Tier 2 capital includes, among other things, perpetual preferred stock and trust preferred securities not meeting the Tier 1 definition, qualifying mandatory convertible debt securities, qualifying subordinated debt, and allowances for possible loan and lease losses, subject to limitations. • Market Risk Capital (Tier 3). Tier 3 capital includes qualifying unsecured subordinated debt. 8 ITEM 1. Business (Continued) Supervision and Regulation (Continued) Capital Requirements (Continued) First Commonwealth, like other bank holding companies, currently is required to maintain Tier 1 capital and “total capital” (the sum of Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital) equal to at least 4.0% and 8.0%, respectively, of its total risk- weighted assets (including various off-balance sheet items, such as letters of credit). FCB, like other depository institutions, is required to maintain similar capital levels under capital adequacy guidelines. In addition, for a depository institution to be considered “well capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, its Tier 1 and total capital ratios must be at least 6.0% and 10.0% on a risk-adjusted basis, respectively. Bank holding companies and banks are also required to comply with minimum leverage ratio requirements. The leverage ratio is the ratio of a banking organization’s Tier 1 capital to its total adjusted quarterly average assets (as defined for regulatory purposes). The minimum leverage ratio is 3.0% for bank holding companies and depository institutions that either have the highest supervisory rating or have implemented the appropriate federal regulatory authority’s risk-adjusted measure for market risk. All other bank holding companies and depository institutions are required to maintain a minimum leverage ratio of 4.0%, unless a different minimum is specified by an appropriate regulatory authority. In addition, for a depository institution to be considered “well capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, its leverage ratio must be at least 5.0%. As of December 31, 2012, FCB was a “well-capitalized” bank as defined by the FDIC. See Note 28 “Regulatory Restrictions and Capital Adequacy” of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, contained in Item 8, for a table that provides a comparison of First Commonwealth’s and FCB’s risk-based capital ratios and the leverage ratio to minimum regulatory requirements. In June 2012, the FRB published two notices of proposed rulemaking (the “2012 Capital Proposals”) that would substantially revise the risk-based capital requirements applicable to bank holding companies and depository institutions compared to the current U.S. risk-based capital rules, which are based on the aforementioned Basel I capital accords of the Basel Committee. One of the 2012 Capital Proposals (the “Basel III Proposal”) addresses the components of capital and other issues affecting the numerator in banking institutions’ regulatory capital ratios and would implement the Basel Committee’s December 2010 framework known as “Basel III” for strengthening international capital standards. The other proposal (the “Standardized Approach Proposal”) addresses risk weights and other issues affecting the denominator in banking institutions’ regulatory capital ratios and would replace the existing Basel I-derived risk-weighting approach with a more risk-sensitive approach based, in part, on the standardized approach in the Basel Committee’s 2004 “Basel II” capital accords. The 2012 Capital Proposals would also implement the requirements of Section 939A of the Dodd-Frank Act to remove references to credit ratings from the federal banking agencies’ rules. As proposed, the Basel III Proposal and the Standardized Approach Proposal would come into effect on January 1, 2013 (subject to a phase-in period) and January 1, 2015 (with an option for early adoption), respectively; however, final rules have not yet been adopted, and the Basel III framework is therefore not yet applicable to First Commonwealth or FCB. The Basel III Proposal, among other things: (1) introduces a new capital measure called “Common Equity Tier 1”, (2) specifies that Tier 1 capital consist of Common Equity Tier 1 and “Additional Tier 1 capital” instruments meeting specified requirements, (3) defines Common Equity Tier 1 narrowly by requiring that most deductions/adjustments to regulatory capital measures be made to Common Equity Tier 1 and not to the other components of capital and (4) expands the scope of the deductions/adjustments as compared to existing regulations. When fully phased in on January 1, 2019, the Basel III Proposal will require First Commonwealth and FCB to maintain (1) a minimum ratio of Common Equity Tier 1 to risk-weighted assets of at least 4.5%, plus a 2.5% “capital conservation buffer” (which is added to the 4.5% Common Equity Tier 1 ratio as that buffer is phased in, 9 ITEM 1. Business (Continued) Supervision and Regulation (Continued) Capital Requirements (Continued) effectively resulting in a minimum ratio of Common Equity Tier 1 to risk-weighted assets of at least 7% upon full implementation), (2) a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 6.0%, plus the capital conservation buffer (which is added to the 6.0% Tier 1 capital ratio as that buffer is phased in, effectively resulting in a minimum Tier 1 capital ratio of 8.5% upon full implementation), (3) a minimum ratio of Total capital (that is, Tier 1 plus Tier 2) to risk-weighted assets of at least 8.0%, plus the capital conservation buffer (which is added to the 8.0% total capital ratio as that buffer is phased in, effectively resulting in a minimum total capital ratio of 10.5% upon full implementation) and (4) a minimum leverage ratio of 4%, calculated as the ratio of Tier 1 capital to average assets. The Basel III Proposal also provides for a “countercyclical capital buffer” over and above the capital conservation buffer that is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress. The countercyclical capital buffer is applicable to only certain covered institutions and is not expected to have any current applicability to First Commonwealth or FCB. The Basel III Proposal provides for a number of deductions from and adjustments to Common Equity Tier 1. These include, for example, the requirement that mortgage servicing rights, deferred tax assets dependent upon future taxable income and significant investments in non-consolidated financial entities be deducted from Common Equity Tier 1 to the extent that any one such category exceeds 10% of Common Equity Tier 1 or all such categories in the aggregate exceed 15% of Common Equity Tier 1. Under current capital standards, the effects of accumulated other comprehensive income items included in capital are excluded for the purposes of determining regulatory capital ratios. Under the Basel III Proposal, the effects of certain accumulated other comprehensive items are not excluded, which could result in significant variations in the level of capital depending upon the impact of interest rate fluctuations on the fair value of First Commonwealth’s securities portfolio. The Basel III Proposal also requires the phase-out of certain hybrid securities, such as trust preferred securities, as Tier 1 capital of bank holding companies. Trust preferred securities no longer included in Tier 1 capital may nonetheless be included as a component of Tier 2 capital. Implementation of the deductions and other adjustments to Common Equity Tier 1 will begin on January 1, 2014 and will be phased-in over a five-year period (20% per year). The implementation of the capital conservation buffer will begin on January 1, 2016 at the 0.625% level and be phased in over a four-year period (increasing by that amount on each subsequent January 1, until it reaches 2.5% on January 1, 2019). The Standardized Approach Proposal would expand the risk-weighting categories from the current four Basel I-derived categories (0%, 20%, 50% and 100%) to a much larger and more risk-sensitive number of categories, depending on the nature of the assets, generally ranging from 0% for U.S. government and agency securities, to 600% for certain equity exposures, and resulting in higher risk weights for a variety of asset categories, including many residential mortgages and certain commercial real estate. Among other things, the Standardized Approach Proposal would: Apply a 150% risk weight instead of a 100% risk weight for certain high volatility commercial real estate acquisition, development and construction loans. Revise risk weightings for residential mortgage exposures to replace the current approach of a 50% risk weight for high-quality seasoned mortgages and a 100% risk-weight for all other mortgages with a risk weight of between 35% and 200% depending upon the mortgage’s loan-to-value ratio and whether the mortgage is a “category 1” or “category 2” residential mortgage exposure (based on eight criteria that include the term, use of negative amortization, balloon payments and certain rate increases). • • 10 ITEM 1. Business (Continued) Supervision and Regulation (Continued) Capital Requirements (Continued) • • • • Assign a 150% risk weight to exposures (other than residential mortgage exposures) that are 90 days past due. Provide for a 20% credit conversion factor for the unused portion of a commitment with an original maturity of one year or less that is not unconditionally cancellable (currently set at 0%). Provide for a risk weight, generally not less than 20% with certain exceptions, for securities lending transactions based on the risk weight category of the underlying collateral securing the transaction. Eliminate the current 50% cap on the risk weight for over-the-counter derivatives. In addition, the Standardized Approach Proposal also provides more advantageous risk weights for derivatives and repurchase-style transactions cleared through a qualifying central counterparty and increases the scope of eligible guarantors and eligible collateral for purposes of credit risk mitigation. Management believes that, as of December 31, 2012, First Commonwealth and FCB would meet all capital adequacy requirements under the Basel III and Standardized Approach Proposals on a fully phased-in basis if such requirements were currently effective. There can be no guarantee that the Basel III and the Standardized Approach Proposals will be adopted in their current form, what changes may be made before adoption, or when ultimate adoption will occur. Requirements to maintain higher levels of capital or to maintain higher levels of liquid assets could adversely impact the Corporation’s net income and return on equity. Liquidity Requirements Historically, regulation and monitoring of bank and bank holding company liquidity has been addressed as a supervisory matter, without required formulaic measures. The Basel III final framework requires banks and bank holding companies to measure their liquidity against specific liquidity tests that, although similar in some respects to liquidity measures historically applied by banks and regulators for management and supervisory purposes, going forward will be required by regulation. One test, referred to as the liquidity coverage ratio (“LCR”), is designed to ensure that the banking entity maintains an adequate level of unencumbered high-quality liquid assets equal to the entity’s expected net cash outflow for a 30-day time horizon (or, if greater, 25% of its expected total cash outflow) under an acute liquidity stress scenario. The other, referred to as the net stable funding ratio (“NSFR”), is designed to promote more medium- and long-term funding of the assets and activities of banking entities over a one-year time horizon. These requirements will incent banking entities to increase their holdings of U.S. Treasury securities and other sovereign debt as a component of assets and increase the use of long-term debt as a funding source. The Basel III framework contemplates that the LCR will remain subject to an observation period through mid-2013 and be implemented as a standard on January 1, 2015 and that the NSFR will be subject to an observation period through mid-2016 and be implemented as a minimum standard by January 1, 2018. These new standards are subject to further rulemaking and their terms may change before implementation. The federal banking agencies have not proposed rules implementing the Basel III liquidity framework and have not determined to what extent they will apply to U.S. banks that are not large, internationally active banks. Anti-Money Laundering and the USA Patriot Act A major focus of governmental policy on financial institutions in recent years has been aimed at combating money laundering and terrorist financing. The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 (the “USA Patriot Act”) substantially broadened the scope of United States anti-money laundering laws and regulations by imposing significant new compliance and due diligence obligations, creating new crimes and penalties and expanding the extra-territorial 11 ITEM 1. Business (Continued) Supervision and Regulation (Continued) Anti-Money Laundering and the USA Patriot Act (Continued) jurisdiction of the United States. The United States Treasury Department has issued and, in some cases, proposed a number of regulations that apply various requirements of the USA Patriot Act to financial institutions such as FCB. These regulations impose obligations on financial institutions to maintain appropriate policies, procedures and controls to detect, prevent and report money laundering and terrorist financing and to verify the identity of their customers. Certain of those regulations impose specific due diligence requirements on financial institutions that maintain correspondent or private banking relationships with non-U.S. financial institutions or persons. Failure of a financial institution to maintain and implement adequate programs to combat money laundering and terrorist financing, or to comply with all of the relevant laws or regulations, could have serious legal and reputational consequences for the institution. Availability of Financial Information We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any document we file at the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Our SEC filings are also available to the public on the SEC website at www.sec.gov and on our website at www.fcbanking.com. We also make available on our website, www.fcbanking.com, and in print to any shareholder who requests them, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the charters for our Audit, Risk, Compensation and Human Resources, and Governance Committees, and the Code of Conduct and Ethics that applies to all of our directors, officers and employees. Our Chief Executive Officer has certified to the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) that, as of the date of the certification, he was not aware of any violation by First Commonwealth of NYSE’s corporate governance listing standards. In addition, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have made certain certifications concerning the information contained in this report pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The Section 302 certifications appear as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 to this annual report on Form 10-K. 12 ITEM 1A. Risk Factors As a financial services company, we are subject to a number of risks, many of which are outside of our control. These risks include, but are not limited to: Changes in interest rates could negatively impact our financial condition and results of operations. Our results of operations depend substantially on net interest income, which is the difference between interest earned on interest-earning assets (such as investments and loans) and interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities (such as deposits and borrowings). Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary policies and domestic and international economic and political conditions. Conditions such as inflation, recession, unemployment, money supply, and other factors beyond our control may also affect interest rates. If our interest-earning assets mature or reprice more quickly than interest-bearing liabilities in a declining interest rate environment, net interest income could be adversely impacted. Likewise, if interest-bearing liabilities mature or reprice more quickly than interest-earnings assets in a rising interest rate environment, net interest income could be adversely impacted. Changes in interest rates also can affect the value of loans and other assets. An increase in interest rates that adversely affects the ability of borrowers to pay the principal or interest on loans may lead to an increase in nonperforming assets and a reduction of income recognized, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows. We are subject to extensive government regulation and supervision. Banking regulations are primarily intended to protect depositors’ funds, federal deposit insurance funds and the banking system as a whole, not security holders. These regulations affect our lending practices, capital structure, investment practices, dividend policy and growth, among other things. Congress and federal regulatory agencies continually review banking laws, regulations and policies for possible changes. The Dodd-Frank Act, enacted in July 2010, instituted major changes to the banking and financial institutions regulatory regimes in light of the recent performance of and government intervention in the financial services sector. Other changes to statutes, regulations or regulatory policies, including changes in interpretation or implementation of statutes, regulations or policies, could affect us in substantial and unpredictable ways. Such changes could subject us to additional costs, limit the types of financial services and products we may offer and/or increase the ability of non-banks to offer competing financial services and products, among other things. Failure to comply with laws, regulations or policies could result in sanctions by regulatory agencies, civil money penalties and/or reputation damage, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. See “Supervision and Regulation” included in Item 1. Business for a more detailed description of the Dodd-Frank Act and other regulatory requirements applicable to First Commonwealth. Further declines in real estate values could adversely affect our earnings and financial condition. As of December 31, 2012, approximately 62% of our loans were secured by real estate. These loans consist of residential real estate loans (approximately 30% of total loans), commercial real estate loans (approximately 30% of total loans) and real estate construction loans (approximately 2% of total loans). Since the beginning of the economic recession in 2008, declines in real estate values and weak demand for new construction, particularly outside of our core Pennsylvania market, have caused deterioration in our loan portfolio and adversely impacted our financial condition and results of operations. Additional declines in real estate values, both within and outside of Pennsylvania, could adversely affect the value of the collateral for these loans, the ability of borrowers to make timely repayment of these loans and our ability to recoup the value of the collateral upon foreclosure, further impacting our earnings and financial condition. 13 ITEM 1A. Risk Factors (Continued) Our earnings are significantly affected by general business and economic conditions. Our operations and profitability are impacted by general business and economic conditions in the United States and abroad. These conditions include short-term and long-term interest rates, inflation, money supply, political issues, legislative and regulatory changes, fluctuations in both debt and equity capital markets, broad trends in industry and finance and the strength of the United States economy, all of which are beyond our control. A deterioration in economic conditions could result in an increase in loan delinquencies and nonperforming assets, decreases in loan collateral values and a decrease in demand for our products and services, among other things, any of which could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations. Our allowance for credit losses may be insufficient. All borrowers carry the potential to default and our remedies to recover may not fully satisfy money previously loaned. We maintain an allowance for credit losses, which is a reserve established through a provision for credit losses charged to expense, which represents management’s best estimate of probable credit losses that have been incurred within the existing portfolio of loans. The allowance, in the judgment of management, is adequate to reserve for estimated loan losses and risks inherent in the loan portfolio. The level of the allowance for credit losses reflects management’s continuing evaluation of industry concentrations; specific credit risks; loan loss experience; current loan portfolio quality; present economic conditions; and unidentified losses in the current loan portfolio. The determination of the appropriate level of the allowance for credit losses inherently involves a high degree of subjectivity and requires us to make significant estimates of current credit risks using existing qualitative and quantitative information, all of which may undergo material changes. Changes in economic conditions affecting borrowers, new information regarding existing loans, identification of additional problem loans and other factors, both within and outside of our control, may require an increase in the allowance for credit losses. In addition, bank regulatory agencies periodically review our allowance for credit losses and may require an increase in the provision for credit losses or the recognition of additional loan charge-offs, based on judgments different than those of management. An increase in the allowance for credit losses results in a decrease in net income, and possibly risk-based capital, and may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Acts of cyber-crime may compromise client and company information, disrupt access to our systems or result in loss of client or company assets. Our business is dependent upon the availability of technology, the Internet and telecommunication systems to enable financial transactions by clients, record and monitor transactions and transmit and receive data to and from clients and third parties. Information security risks have increased significantly due to the use of online, telephone and mobile banking channels by clients and the increased sophistication and activities of organized crime, hackers, terrorists and other external parties. Our technologies, systems, networks and our clients’ devices have been subject to, and are likely to continue to be the target of, cyber-attacks, computer viruses, malicious code, phishing attacks or information security breaches that could result in the unauthorized release, gathering, monitoring, misuse, loss or destruction of our or our clients’ confidential, proprietary and other information, the theft of client assets through fraudulent transactions or disruption of our or our clients’ or other third parties’ business operations. During the quarter ending September 30, 2012, we incurred a $3.5 million charge in connection with fraudulent wire transfers involving the breach of a commercial client’s computer system to gain access to our online banking system. There was no breach of First Commonwealth’s systems, however, following this incident, we have enhanced our monitoring and security procedures to help prevent and mitigate the risk of fraudulent transfers. However, there can be no assurance that we will not incur fraud losses in the future. 14 ITEM 1A. Risk Factors (Continued) We could suffer large losses due to the large size of certain loans. As of December 31, 2012, we had 38 commercial loans with commitments greater than $15.0 million with an aggregate amount of such commitments equal to $907.8 million. If one or more of these large loans deteriorates or if the borrowers default, we could suffer losses which would have a significant impact on our earnings and financial condition. We have a significant deferred tax asset and cannot assure it will be fully realized. We had net deferred tax assets of $64.1 million as of December 31, 2012. We did not establish a valuation allowance against our federal net deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2012 as we believe that it is more likely than not that all of these assets will be realized. In evaluating the need for a valuation allowance, we estimated future taxable income based on management approved forecasts. This process required significant judgment by management about matters that are by nature uncertain. If future events differ from our current forecasts, we may need to establish a valuation allowance, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. We must evaluate whether any portion of our recorded goodwill is impaired. Impairment testing may result in a material, non-cash write-down of our goodwill assets and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations. At December 31, 2012, goodwill represented approximately 3% of our total assets. We have recorded goodwill because we paid more for some of our businesses than the fair market value of the tangible and separately measurable intangible net assets of those businesses. We test our goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives for impairment at least annually (or whenever events occur which may indicate possible impairment). Goodwill impairment is determined by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value exceeds the carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is not considered impaired. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying amount, goodwill is considered impaired. Determining the fair value of our company requires a high degree of subjective management assumptions. Any changes in key assumptions about our business and its prospects, changes in market conditions or other externalities, for impairment testing purposes could result in a non-cash impairment charge and such a charge could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations. The challenges of the current economic environment may adversely affect our earnings, the fair value of our assets and liabilities and our stock price, all of which may increase the risk of goodwill impairment. We have significant exposure to a downturn in the financial services industry due to our investments in trust preferred securities. As of December 31, 2012, we had single issuer trust preferred securities and trust preferred collateralized debt obligations with an aggregate book value of $51.9 million and an unrealized loss of approximately $23.4 million. These securities were issued by banks, bank holding companies and other financial services providers. Depending on the severe economic recession and its impact on the financial services industry, we may be required to record additional impairment charges on other investment securities if they suffer a decline in value that is considered other-than-temporary. If the credit quality of the securities in our investment portfolio deteriorates, we may also experience a loss in interest income from the suspension of either interest or dividend payments. Numerous factors, including lack of liquidity for resales of certain investment securities, absence of reliable pricing information for investment securities, adverse changes in business climate or adverse actions by regulators could have a negative effect on our investment portfolio in future periods. If an impairment charge is significant enough it could affect the ability of FCB to upstream dividends to us, which could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and our ability to pay dividends to shareholders and could also negatively impact our regulatory capital ratios and result in us not being classified as “well-capitalized” for regulatory purposes. 15 ITEM 1A. Risk Factors (Continued) First Commonwealth relies on dividends from its subsidiaries for most of its revenues. First Commonwealth is a separate and distinct legal entity from its subsidiaries. It receives substantially all of its revenues from dividends from its subsidiaries. These dividends are the principal source of funds to pay dividends on First Commonwealth’s common stock and interest and principal on First Commonwealth’s debt. Various federal and/or state laws and regulations limit the amount of dividends that FCB and certain non-bank subsidiaries may pay to First Commonwealth. In the event FCB is unable to pay dividends to First Commonwealth, First Commonwealth may not be able to service debt, pay obligations or pay dividends on its common stock. The inability to receive dividends from FCB could have a material adverse effect on First Commonwealth’s business, financial condition and results of operations. Competition from other financial institutions in originating loans, attracting deposits and providing various financial services may adversely affect our profitability. We face substantial competition in originating loans and attracting deposits. This competition comes principally from other banks, savings institutions, mortgage banking companies and credit unions, as well as institutions offering uninsured investment alternatives, including money market funds. Many of our competitors enjoy advantages, including greater financial resources and higher lending limits, better brand recognition, a wider geographic presence, more accessible branch office locations, the ability to offer a wider array of services or more favorable pricing alternatives, as well as lower origination and operating costs. These competitors may offer more favorable pricing through lower interest rates on loans or higher interest rates on deposits, which could force us to match competitive rates and thereby reduce our net interest income. Negative publicity could damage our reputation. Reputation risk, or the risk to our earnings and capital from negative public opinion, is inherent in our business. Negative public opinion could adversely affect our ability to keep and attract customers and expose us to adverse legal and regulatory consequences. Negative public opinion could result from our actual or alleged conduct in any number of activities, including lending practices, corporate governance, regulatory compliance, mergers and acquisitions, and disclosure, sharing or inadequate protection of customer information, and from actions taken by government regulators and community organizations in response to that conduct. Because we conduct all of our business under the “First Commonwealth” brand, negative public opinion about one business could affect our other businesses. An interruption to our information systems could adversely impact our operations. We rely upon our information systems for operating and monitoring all major aspects of our business, including deposit and loan operations, as well as internal management functions. These systems and our operations could be damaged or interrupted by natural disasters, power loss, network failure, improper operation by our employees, security breaches, computer viruses, intentional attacks by third parties or other unexpected events. Any disruption in the operation of our information systems could adversely impact our operations, which may affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Provisions of our articles of incorporation, bylaws and Pennsylvania law, as well as state and federal banking regulations, could delay or prevent a takeover of us by a third party. Provisions in our articles of incorporation and bylaws, the corporate law of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and state and federal regulations could delay, defer or prevent a third party from acquiring us, despite the possible benefit to our shareholders, or otherwise adversely affect the price of our common stock. These provisions include, among other things, advance notice requirements for proposing matters that shareholders may act on at shareholder meetings. In addition, under Pennsylvania law, we are prohibited from engaging in a 16 ITEM 1A. Risk Factors (Continued) business combination with any interested shareholder for a period of five years from the date the person became an interested shareholder unless certain conditions are met. These provisions may discourage potential takeover attempts, discourage bids for our common stock at a premium over market price or adversely affect the market price of, and the voting and other rights of the holders of, our common stock. ITEM 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments None. ITEM 2. Properties Our principal office is located in the old Indiana County courthouse complex, consisting of the former courthouse building and the former sheriff’s residence and jail building for Indiana County. This certified Pennsylvania and national historic landmark was built in 1870 and restored by us in the early 1970s. We lease the complex from Indiana County pursuant to a lease agreement that was originally signed in 1973 and has a current term that expires in 2048. The majority of our administrative personnel are also located in two owned buildings and one leased premise in Indiana, Pennsylvania, each of which is in close proximity to our principal office. First Commonwealth Bank has 112 banking offices of which 27 are leased and 85 are owned. We also lease one loan production offices. While these facilities are adequate to meet our current needs, available space is limited and additional facilities may be required to support future expansion. However, we have no current plans to lease, purchase or construct additional administrative facilities. ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings The information required by this Item is set forth in Part II, Item 8, Note 26, “Contingent Liabilities,” which is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item. ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures Not applicable Executive Officers of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation The name, age and principal occupation for each of the executive officers of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation as of December 31, 2012 is set forth below: I. Robert Emmerich, age 62, has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer of First Commonwealth Bank since 2009. Prior to joining First Commonwealth, Mr. Emmerich was retired from a 31- year career at National City Corporation, where he most recently served as Executive Vice President & Chief Credit Officer for Consumer Lending. Leonard V. Lombardi, age 53, has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Audit Executive of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation since January 1, 2009. He was formerly Senior Vice President / Loan Review and Audit Manager. 17 Executive Officers of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation (Continued) Norman J. Montgomery, age 45, has served as the Executive Vice President of Business Integration of First Commonwealth Bank since May 2011. He oversees First Commonwealth’s product development, marketing and business analysis functions and assumed oversight of First Commonwealth’s technology and operations functions in July 2012. He served as Senior Vice President/Business Integration of First Commonwealth Bank from September 2007 until May 2011 and previously held positions in the technology, operations and audit areas. T. Michael Price, age 50, has served as President of First Commonwealth Bank since November 2007. On March 7, 2012, he began serving as President and Chief Executive Officer of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation. From January 1, 2012 to March 7, 2012, he served as Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation. He was formerly Chief Executive Officer of the Cincinnati and Northern Kentucky Region of National City Bank from July 2004 to November 2007 and Executive Vice President and Head of Small Business Banking of National City Bank prior to July 2004. Robert E. Rout, age 61, joined First Commonwealth Financial Corporation as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in February 2010. Prior to joining First Commonwealth, Mr. Rout served as Chief Financial Officer and Secretary for S&T Bancorp, Inc. in Indiana, PA, since 1999 and as Chief Administrative Officer of S&T Bancorp, Inc. since April 2008. Matthew C. Tomb, age 36, has served as Executive Vice President, Chief Risk Officer and General Counsel of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation since November 2010. He previously served as Senior Vice President / Legal and Compliance since September 2007. Before joining First Commonwealth, Mr. Tomb practiced law with Sherman & Howard L.L.C. in Denver, Colorado. 18 PART II ITEM 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchase of Equity Securities First Commonwealth is listed on the NYSE under the symbol “FCF.” As of December 31, 2012, there were approximately 9,002 holders of record of First Commonwealth’s common stock. The table below sets forth the high and low sales prices per share and cash dividends declared per share for common stock of First Commonwealth for each quarter during the last two fiscal years. Period High Sale Low Sale Cash Dividends Per Share 2012 First Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Second Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Third Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fourth Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $6.68 6.73 7.55 7.30 $5.47 5.73 6.67 5.92 $0.03 0.05 0.05 0.05 Period High Sale Low Sale Cash Dividends Per Share 2011 First Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Second Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Third Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fourth Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $7.36 6.96 5.89 5.45 $6.11 5.18 3.66 3.55 $0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 Federal and state regulations contain restrictions on the ability of First Commonwealth to pay dividends. For information regarding restrictions on dividends, see Part I, Item 1 “Business—Supervision and Regulation— Restrictions on Dividends” and Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 28, Regulatory Restrictions and Capital Adequacy.” In addition, under the terms of the capital securities issued by First Commonwealth Capital Trust I, II, and III, First Commonwealth could not pay dividends on its common stock if First Commonwealth deferred payments on the junior subordinated debt securities which provide the cash flow for the payments on the capital securities. 19 ITEM 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchase of Equity Securities (Continued) The following five-year performance graph compares the cumulative total shareholder return (assuming reinvestment of dividends) on First Commonwealth’s common stock to the KBW Regional Banking Index and the Russell 2000 Index. The stock performance graph assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 2007, and the cumulative return is measured as of each subsequent fiscal year end. Total Return Performance 150 125 100 75 50 25 e u l a V x e d n I First Commonwealth Financial Corporation Russell 2000 KBW Regional Banking Index 0 12/31/07 12/31/08 12/31/09 12/31/10 12/31/11 12/31/12 Index 12/31/2007 12/31/2008 12/31/2009 12/31/2010 12/31/2011 12/31/2012 First Commonwealth Financial Corporation . . . . . Russell 2000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . KBW Regional Banking Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.00 100.00 100.00 123.31 66.21 81.42 47.39 84.20 63.41 72.88 106.82 76.34 55.32 102.36 72.41 73.75 119.09 82.12 Period Ending 20 ITEM 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchase of Equity Securities (Continued) Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds On June 19, 2012, the Company announced a share repurchase program through which the Board of Directors authorized management to repurchase up to $50.0 million of the Company’s common stock. The following table details the amount of shares repurchased under this program during the fourth quarter of 2012: Month Ending: Total Number of Shares Purchased Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs October 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . November 30, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . December 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,335,500 1,694,409 1,290,274 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,320,183 $6.78 6.29 6.69 $6.56 1,335,500 1,694,409 1,290,274 4,320,183 4,860,568 3,302,800 1,838,716 * Remaining number of shares approved under the Plan is estimated based on the market value of the Company’s common stock of $6.55 at October 31, 2012, $6.41 at November 30, 2012 and $6.82 at December 31, 2012. 21 ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data The following selected financial data is not covered by the auditor’s report and should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, which follows, and with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes. Periods Ended December 31, 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 (dollars in thousands, except share data) Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219,075 $ 30,146 231,545 $ 41,678 268,360 $ 61,599 293,281 $ 86,771 Net interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for credit losses . . . . . . . . . . . . Net interest income after provision for credit losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net impairment losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net securities gains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income (Loss) before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax provision (benefit) . . . . . . . . 188,929 20,544 168,385 0 192 65,242 177,207 56,612 14,658 189,867 55,816 206,761 61,552 206,510 100,569 134,051 0 2,185 55,484 176,826 145,209 (9,193) 2,422 56,005 171,226 105,941 (36,185) 273 55,237 171,151 14,894 (380) 23,217 239 (45,885) (25,821) Net Income (Loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 41,954 $ 15,274 $ 22,978 $ (20,064) $ Per Share Data—Basic Net Income (Loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Dividends declared . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Average shares outstanding . . . . . . . 0.40 $ 0.18 $ 0.15 $ 0.12 $ 0.25 $ 0.06 $ (0.24) $ 0.18 $ 103,885,396 104,700,227 93,197,225 84,589,780 Per Share Data—Diluted Net Income (Loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Average shares outstanding . . . . . . . 0.40 $ 0.15 $ 0.25 $ (0.24) $ 103,885,663 104,700,393 93,199,773 84,589,780 327,596 138,998 188,598 23,095 165,503 (13,011) 1,517 54,325 158,615 49,719 6,632 43,087 0.58 0.68 74,477,795 0.58 74,583,236 At End of Period Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Investment securities . . . . . . . . . . . . Loans and leases, net of unearned 5,995,390 $ 1,199,531 income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Allowance for credit losses . . . . . . . Deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Short-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . Subordinated debentures . . . . . . . . . Other long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . Shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,204,704 67,187 4,557,881 356,227 105,750 174,471 746,007 Key Ratios 5,841,122 $ 5,812,842 $ 6,446,293 $ 6,425,880 1,452,191 1,182,572 1,016,574 1,222,045 4,057,055 61,234 4,504,684 312,777 105,750 101,664 758,543 4,218,083 71,229 4,617,852 187,861 105,750 98,748 749,777 4,636,501 81,639 4,535,785 958,932 105,750 168,697 638,811 4,418,377 52,759 4,280,343 1,139,737 105,750 183,493 652,779 Return on average assets . . . . . . . . . Return on average equity . . . . . . . . . Net loans to deposits ratio . . . . . . . . Dividends per share as a percent of net income per share . . . . . . . . . . Average equity to average assets ratio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.71% 5.46 90.78 44.57 12.95 0.27% 2.00 88.70 82.26 13.33 0.37% 3.33 89.80 (0.31)% (3.06) 100.42 0.70% 7.45 101.99 23.72 11.26 NA 117.54 10.16 9.35 22 ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations The following discussion and analysis represents an overview of the financial condition and the results of operations of First Commonwealth and its subsidiaries, FCB, First Commonwealth Insurance Agency, Inc. (“FCIA”) and First Commonwealth Financial Advisors, Inc. (“FCFA”), as of and for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010. The purpose of this discussion is to focus on information concerning our financial condition and results of operations that is not readily apparent from the Consolidated Financial Statements. In order to obtain a clear understanding of this discussion, you should refer to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the notes thereto and other financial information presented in this Annual Report. Company Overview First Commonwealth provides a diversified array of consumer and commercial banking services through our bank subsidiary, FCB. We also provide trust and wealth management services through FCFA and insurance products through FCIA. At December 31, 2012, FCB operated 112 community banking offices throughout western Pennsylvania and one loan production office in downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Our consumer services include Internet, mobile and telephone banking, an automated teller machine network, personal checking accounts, interest-earning checking accounts, savings accounts, insured money market accounts, debit cards, investment certificates, fixed and variable rate certificates of deposit, secured and unsecured installment loans, construction and real estate loans, safe deposit facilities, credit lines with overdraft checking protection and IRA accounts. Commercial banking services include commercial lending, small and high-volume business checking accounts, on-line account management services, ACH origination, payroll direct deposit, commercial cash management services and repurchase agreements. We also provide a variety of trust and asset management services and a full complement of auto, home and business insurance as well as term life insurance. We offer annuities, mutual funds, stock and bond brokerage services through an arrangement with a broker-dealer and insurance brokers. Most of our commercial customers are small and mid-sized businesses in central and western Pennsylvania. As a financial institution with a focus on traditional banking activities, we earn the majority of our revenue through net interest income, which is the difference between interest earned on loans and investments and interest paid on deposits and borrowings. Growth in net interest income is dependent upon balance sheet growth and maintaining or increasing our net interest margin, which is net interest income (on a fully taxable-equivalent basis) as a percentage of our average interest-earning assets. We also generate revenue through fees earned on various services and products that we offer to our customers and through sales of assets, such as loans, investments or properties. These revenue sources are offset by provisions for credit losses on loans, loss on sale or other-than-temporary impairments on investment securities, operating expenses and income taxes. General economic conditions also affect our business by impacting our customers’ need for financing, thus affecting loan growth, and impacting the credit strength of existing and potential borrowers. Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Accounting Estimates First Commonwealth’s accounting and reporting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and predominant practice in the banking industry. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Over time, these estimates, assumptions and judgments may prove to be inaccurate or vary from actual results and may significantly affect our reported results and financial position for the period presented or in future periods. We currently view the determination of the allowance for credit losses, fair value of financial instruments, goodwill and other intangible assets, and income taxes to be critical because they are highly dependent on subjective or complex judgments, assumptions and estimates made by management. 23 ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued) Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Accounting Estimates (Continued) Allowance for Credit Losses We account for the credit risk associated with our lending activities through the allowance and provision for credit losses. The allowance represents management’s best estimate of probable losses that are inherent in our existing loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date. The provision is a periodic charge to earnings in an amount necessary to maintain the allowance at a level that is appropriate based on management’s assessment of probable estimated losses. Management determines and reviews with the Board of Directors the adequacy of the allowance on a quarterly basis in accordance with the methodology described below. • Individual loans are selected for review in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 310, “Receivables.” These are generally large balance commercial loans and commercial mortgages that are rated less than “satisfactory” based on our internal credit-rating process. • We assess whether the loans identified for review in step one are “impaired,” which means that it is probable that all amounts will not be collected according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement, which generally represents loans that management has placed on nonaccrual status. • For impaired loans we calculate the estimated fair value of the loans that are selected for review based on observable market prices, discounted cash flows or the value of the underlying collateral and record an allowance if needed. • We then select pools of homogenous smaller balance loans having similar risk characteristics as well as unimpaired larger commercial loans for evaluation collectively under the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 450, “Contingencies.” These smaller balance loans generally include residential mortgages, consumer loans, installment loans and some commercial loans. • FASB ASC Topic 450 loans are segmented into groups with similar characteristics and an allowance for credit losses is allocated to each segment based on recent loss history and other relevant information. • We then review the results to determine the appropriate balance of the allowance for credit losses. This review includes consideration of additional factors, such as the mix of loans in the portfolio, the balance of the allowance relative to total loans and nonperforming assets, trends in the overall risk profile in the portfolio, trends in delinquencies and nonaccrual loans, and local and national economic information and industry data, including trends in the industries we believe are higher risk. There are many factors affecting the allowance for credit losses; some are quantitative while others require qualitative judgment. These factors require the use of estimates related to the amount and timing of expected future cash flows, appraised values on impaired loans, collateral valuations for classified loans that are not impaired, estimated losses for each loan category based on historical loss experience and delinquency trends by category using a four to twenty quarter average, and consideration of current economic trends and conditions, all of which may be susceptible to significant judgment and change. To the extent that actual outcomes differ from estimates, additional provisions for credit losses could be required that could adversely affect our earnings or financial position in future periods. The loan portfolio represents the largest asset category on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. 24 ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued) Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Accounting Estimates (Continued) Fair Values of Financial Instruments FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” establishes a framework for measuring fair value. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 820, First Commonwealth groups financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value in three levels based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. Level 1 valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 valuations are for instruments that trade in less active dealer or broker markets and incorporates values obtained for identical or comparable instruments. Level 3 valuations are derived from other valuation methodologies, including option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques, and not based on market exchange, dealer or broker traded transactions. Level 3 valuations incorporate certain assumptions and projections in determining the fair value assigned to each instrument. Level 2 investment securities are valued by a recognized third party pricing service using observable inputs. Management validates the market values provided by the third party service by having another recognized pricing service price 100% of securities on an annual basis and a random sample of securities each quarter, monthly monitoring of variances from prior period pricing and on a monthly basis evaluating pricing changes compared to expectations based on changes in the financial markets. Level 3 investments include pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations. The fair values of these investments are determined by a specialized third party valuation service. Management validates the fair value of the pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations by monitoring the performance of the underlying collateral, discussing the discount rate, cash flow assumptions and general market trends with the specialized third party and by confirming changes in the underlying collateral to the trustee and underwriter reports. Management’s monitoring of the underlying collateral includes deferrals of interest payments, payment defaults, cures of previously deferred interest payments, any regulatory filings or actions and general news related to the underlying collateral. Management also evaluates fair value changes compared to expectations based on changes in the interest rates used in determining the discount rate and general financial markets. Methodologies and estimates used by management when determining the fair value for pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations and testing those securities for other-than-temporary impairment are discussed in detail in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and in Note 11 “Impairment of Investment Securities” and Note 21 “Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities” of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets We consider our accounting policies related to goodwill and other intangible assets to be critical because the assumptions or judgment used in determining the fair value of assets and liabilities acquired in past acquisitions are subjective and complex. As a result, changes in these assumptions or judgment could have a significant impact on our financial condition or results of operations. The fair value of acquired assets and liabilities, including the resulting goodwill, was based either on quoted market prices or provided by other third-party sources, when available. When third-party information was not available, estimates were made in good faith by management primarily through the use of internal cash flow modeling techniques. The assumptions that were used in the cash flow modeling were subjective and are susceptible to significant changes. 25 ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued) Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Accounting Estimates (Continued) Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (Continued) Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are tested for impairment at least annually and written down and charged to results of operations only in periods in which the recorded value is more than the estimated fair value. Intangible assets that have finite useful lives will continue to be amortized over their useful lives and are periodically evaluated for impairment. As of December 31, 2012, goodwill and other intangible assets were not considered impaired; however, changing economic conditions that may adversely affect our performance and stock price could result in impairment, which could adversely affect earnings in future periods. Our Step 1 goodwill impairment analysis as of November 30, 2012, determined that the fair value of our goodwill exceeded its carrying value by approximately 6%. An assessment of qualitative factors was completed as of December 31, 2012 and indicated that it is more likely than not that our fair value exceeded its carrying value. Income Taxes We estimate income tax expense based on amounts expected to be owed to the tax jurisdictions where we conduct business. On a quarterly basis, management assesses the reasonableness of its effective tax rate based upon its current estimate of the amount and components of net income, tax credits and the applicable statutory tax rates expected for the full year. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined using the asset and liability method and are reported in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. If current available information raises doubt as to the realization of the deferred tax assets, a valuation allowance is established. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to be applied to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Management assesses all available positive and negative evidence on a quarterly basis to estimate if sufficient future taxable income will be generated to utilize the existing deferred tax assets. The amount of future taxable income used in management’s valuation is based upon management approved forecasts, evaluation of historical earnings levels, proven ability to raise capital to support growth or during times of economic stress and consideration of prudent and feasible potential tax strategies. If future events differ from our current forecasts, a valuation allowance may be required, which could have a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations. Accrued taxes represent the net estimated amount due to taxing jurisdictions and are reported in other liabilities in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Management evaluates and assesses the relative risks and appropriate tax treatment of transactions and filing positions after considering statutes, regulations, judicial precedent and other information and maintains tax accruals consistent with its evaluation of these relative risks and merits. Changes to the estimate of accrued taxes occur periodically due to changes in tax rates, interpretations of tax laws, the status of examinations being conducted by taxing authorities and changes to statutory, judicial and regulatory guidance. These changes, when they occur, can affect deferred taxes and accrued taxes, as well as the current period’s income tax expense and can be significant to our operating results. Results of Operations—2012 Compared to 2011 Net Income Net income for 2012 was $42.0 million, or $0.40 per diluted share, as compared to net income of $15.3 million, or $0.15 per diluted share, in 2011. The increase in 2012 performance was primarily the result of a $35.3 million 26 ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued) Results of Operations—2012 Compared to 2011 (Continued) Net Income (Continued) decrease in provision expense, a decrease of $2.0 million related to loss on sale or write-down of assets, and a $7.4 million decrease in credit risk recognized on interest rate swaps. Partially offsetting the aforementioned items are a $0.9 million decrease in net interest income, a $2.0 million decrease in net securities gains, and a $3.6 million increase in operational losses. Our return on average equity was 5.5% and return on average assets was 0.71% for 2012, compared to 2.0% and 0.27%, respectively, for 2011. Average diluted shares for the year 2012 were 1% less than the comparable period in 2011 primarily due to the common stock buyback program that was authorized during 2012. Net Interest Income Net interest income, which is our primary source of revenue, is the difference between interest income from earning assets (loans and securities) and interest expense paid on liabilities (deposits, short-term borrowings and long-term debt). The amount of net interest income is affected by both changes in the level of interest rates and the amount and composition of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The net interest margin is expressed as the percentage of net interest income, on a fully taxable equivalent basis, to average interest-earning assets. To compare the tax exempt asset yields to taxable yields, amounts are adjusted to the pretaxable equivalent amounts based on the marginal corporate federal income tax rate of 35%. The taxable equivalent adjustment to net interest income for 2012 was $4.4 million compared to $5.5 million in 2011. Net interest income, on a fully taxable equivalent basis, was $193.3 million for the year-ended December 31, 2012, a $2.1 million, or 1%, decrease compared to $195.4 million for the same period in 2011. The net interest margin, on a fully taxable equivalent basis decreased 19 basis points, or 5%, to 3.61% in 2012 from 3.80% in 2011. The net interest margin is affected by both changes in the level of interest rates and the amount and composition of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. During the year-ended December 31, 2012, the net interest margin has been challenged by the continuing low interest rate environment and decreasing rates earned on interest-earning assets. Despite a disciplined approach to pricing which has provided for maintaining the level of new volume spreads, runoff of existing assets which are earning higher interest rates has continued to provide for lower yields on earning assets. Growth in earning assets has helped to offset the impact of runoff, as average earning assets for the year increased $212.1 million, or 4%, compared to the comparable period in 2011. Positively impacting the net interest margin for the year 2012 was the recognition of $1.0 million in interest income related to the payoff of a loan that was previously in nonaccrual status and $0.5 million in interest income recognized as an adjustment of yield for a loan that was returned to accrual status. These contributed 3 basis points to the net interest margin for the year 2012. Given the current interest rate environment, it is expected that the challenges to the net interest margin will continue as $2.8 billion in interest-sensitive assets either reprice or mature over the next twelve months. The taxable equivalent yield on interest-earning assets was 4.18% for the year-ended December 31, 2012, a decrease of 43 basis points from the 4.61% yield for the same period in 2011. This decline can be attributed to the repricing of our variable rate assets in a low rate environment as well as lower interest rates available on new investments and loans. Reductions in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities partially offset the impact of lower yields on interest-earning assets. The cost of interest-bearing liabilities was 0.70% for the year-ended December 31, 2012, compared to 0.99% for the same period in 2011. 27 ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued) Results of Operations—2012 Compared to 2011 (Continued) Net Interest Income (Continued) Comparing the year-ended December 31, 2012 with the same period in 2011, changes in interest rates negatively impacted net interest income by $13.3 million. The lower yield on interest-earning assets adversely impacted net interest income by $22.7 million, while the decline in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities had a positive impact of $9.4 million. We have been able to partially mitigate the impact of lower interest rates and the effect on net interest income through improving the mix of deposits and borrowed funds, disciplined pricing strategies, loan growth and increasing our investment volumes within established interest rate risk management guidelines. While decreases in interest rates and yields compressed the net interest margin, increases in average interest- earning assets and low cost average interest-bearing liabilities neutralized the effect on net interest income. Changes in the volumes of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities positively impacted net interest income by $11.3 million in the year-ended December 31, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011. Higher levels of interest-earning assets resulted in an increase of $9.2 million in interest income, while volume changes primarily attributed to the mix of deposits reduced interest expense by $2.1 million. Positively affecting net interest income was a $97.2 million increase in average net free funds at December 31, 2012 as compared to December 31, 2011. Average net free funds are the excess of noninterest-bearing demand deposits, other noninterest-bearing liabilities and shareholders’ equity over noninterest-earning assets. The largest component of the increase in net free funds was a $90.0 million increase in average noninterest-bearing demand deposits as a result of marketing promotions aimed at attracting new and retaining existing customers. Additionally, higher costing time deposits continue to runoff and reprice to lower costing certificates or other deposit alternatives. Average time deposits for the year-ended December 31, 2012 decreased $205.2 million, or 15%, compared to the comparable period in 2011. The positive change in deposit mix is expected to continue as $511.1 million in certificates of deposits either mature or reprice over the next twelve months. The following table reconciles interest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income to net interest income adjusted to a fully taxable equivalent basis for the periods presented: For the Years Ended December 31, 2012 2011 2010 Interest income per Consolidated Statements of Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjustment to fully taxable equivalent basis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (dollars in thousands) $231,545 5,500 $268,360 9,174 $219,075 4,392 Interest income adjusted to fully taxable equivalent basis (non-GAAP) . . . . . . Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223,467 30,146 237,045 41,678 277,534 61,599 Net interest income adjusted to fully taxable equivalent basis (non-GAAP) . . $193,321 $195,367 $215,935 28 ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued) Results of Operations—2012 Compared to 2011 (Continued) Net Interest Income (Continued) The following table provides information regarding the average balances and yields and rates on interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities for the periods ended December 31: Average Balance Sheets and Net Interest Analysis 2012 2011 2010 Average Balance Income / Expense (a) Yield or Rate Average Balance Income / Expense (a) Yield or Rate Average Balance Income / Expense (a) Yield or Rate (dollars in thousands) Assets Interest-earning assets: Interest-bearing deposits with banks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4,329 $ Tax-free investment securities . . . . . 271 Taxable investment securities . . . . . . 1,179,169 Loans, net of unearned 6 18 31,799 income (b)(c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,165,292 191,644 Total interest-earning assets . . . . . 5,349,061 223,467 0.14% $ 6.64 2.70 26,477 $ 4,852 1,043,798 64 328 33,812 0.24% $ 6.76 3.24 37,043 $ 120,239 939,459 94 8,025 37,988 0.25% 6.67 4.04 4.60 4.18 4,061,822 202,841 5,136,949 237,045 4.99 4.61 4,467,338 231,427 5,564,079 277,534 5.18 4.99 Noninterest-earning assets: Cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Allowance for credit losses . . . . . . . . Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75,044 (65,279) 581,321 Total noninterest-earning assets . . 591,086 75,071 (76,814) 593,248 591,505 77,259 (96,872) 592,612 572,999 Total Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $5,940,147 $5,728,454 $6,137,078 Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity Interest-bearing liabilities: Interest-bearing demand deposits (d) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 645,970 $ Savings deposits (d) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,921,417 Time deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,138,112 402,196 Short-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . 202,598 Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total interest-bearing liabilities . . 4,310,293 286 4,233 16,935 1,070 7,622 30,146 0.04% $ 607,756 $ 0.22 1.49 0.27 3.76 1,877,321 1,343,281 182,864 184,185 0.70 4,195,407 515 7,252 25,729 728 7,454 41,678 0.08% $ 622,171 $ 0.39 1.92 0.40 4.05 1,800,418 1,596,088 488,078 236,939 0.99 4,743,694 751 12,171 36,923 1,948 9,806 61,599 0.12% 0.68 2.31 0.40 4.14 1.30 Noninterest-bearing liabilities and shareholders’ equity: Noninterest-bearing demand deposits (d) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . 810,041 50,859 768,954 Total noninterest-bearing funding sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,629,854 Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity . . . . . $5,940,147 Net Interest Income and Net Yield on Interest-Earning Assets . . . . . . . . . 720,005 49,163 763,879 1,533,047 $5,728,454 658,947 43,413 691,024 1,393,384 $6,137,078 $193,321 3.61% $195,367 3.80% $215,935 3.88% Income on interest-earning assets has been computed on a fully taxable equivalent basis using the 35% federal income tax statutory rate. Income on nonaccrual loans is accounted for on the cash basis, and the loan balances are included in interest-earning assets. (a) (b) (c) Loan income includes loan fees. (d) Average balances do not include reallocations from noninterest-bearing demand deposits and interest-bearing demand deposits into savings deposits which were made for regulatory purposes. 29 ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued) Results of Operations—2012 Compared to 2011 (Continued) Net Interest Income (Continued) The following table sets forth certain information regarding changes in net interest income attributable to changes in the volumes of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and changes in the rates for the periods indicated: Analysis of Year-to-Year Changes in Net Interest Income 2012 Change from 2011 2011 Change from 2010 Total Change Change Due To Volume Change Due To Rate (a) Total Change Change Due To Volume Change Due To Rate (a) (dollars in thousands) Interest-earning assets: Interest-bearing deposits with banks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tax-free investment securities . . . . Taxable investment securities . . . . . Loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (58) (310) (2,013) (11,197) Total interest income (b) . . . . . . . (13,578) Interest-bearing liabilities: Interest-bearing demand deposits . . Savings deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Time deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Short-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term debt (229) (3,019) (8,794) 342 168 Total interest expense . . . . . . . . . (11,532) $ (53) (310) 4,386 5,163 9,186 31 172 (3,939) 877 746 (2,113) $ (5) $ 0 (6,399) (16,360) (30) $ (7,697) (4,176) (28,586) (26) (7,696) 4,215 (21,006) $ (4) (1) (8,391) (7,580) (22,764) (40,489) (24,513) (15,976) (260) (3,191) (4,855) (535) (578) (236) (4,919) (11,194) (1,220) (2,352) (9,419) (19,921) (17) 523 (5,840) (1,221) (2,184) (8,739) (219) (5,442) (5,354) 1 (168) (11,182) Net interest income . . . . . . . . . $ (2,046) $11,299 $(13,345) $(20,568) $(15,774) $ (4,794) (a) Changes in interest income or expense not arising solely as a result of volume or rate variances are allocated to rate variances. (b) Changes in interest income have been computed on a fully taxable equivalent basis using the 35% federal income tax statutory rate. Provision for Credit Losses The provision for credit losses is determined based on management’s estimates of the appropriate level of allowance for credit losses needed to absorb probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio, after giving consideration to charge-offs and recoveries for the period. The provision for credit losses is an amount added to the allowance against which credit losses are charged. The provision for credit losses for the year 2012 totaled $20.5 million, a decrease of $35.3 million, or 63%, compared to the year 2011. This provision exceeded net credit losses for the year 2012 by $14.6 million. 30 ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued) Results of Operations—2012 Compared to 2011 (Continued) Provision for Credit Losses (Continued) The table below provides a breakout of the provision for credit losses by loan category for the years ended December 31: 2012 2011 Dollars Percentage Dollars Percentage Commercial, financial, agricultural and other . . . . . . Real estate construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Residential real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Commercial real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loans to individuals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unallocated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6,416 5,191 1,077 3,921 2,849 1,090 (dollars in thousands) $ 3,141 16,685 6,758 26,560 2,781 (109) 31% 26 5 19 14 5 6% 30 12 47 5 0 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $20,544 100% $55,816 100% As evidenced by the table, the current year provision is largely the result of the commercial financial, agricultural and other, real estate construction and commercial real estate portions of the portfolio. The provision for credit losses for commercial, financial, agricultural and other loans is primarily due to increases of $4.9 million in specific reserves related to three loan relationships that were placed in nonaccrual status during 2012. Of the $5.2 million provision for credit losses related to construction loans, $4.6 million can be attributed to the impact historical losses had on the allowance for loan loss calculation. The commercial real estate provision for credit losses can be attributed to specific reserves of $5.3 million related to two loan relationships that were placed in nonaccrual status during 2012. The $1.1 million unallocated provision for credit losses is a result of management’s analysis of certain qualitative factors impacting the reserve for credit losses and concern over the impact of the continued difficult economic conditions being experienced by our borrowers. This analysis included factors related primarily to portfolio risk and the impact of economic conditions on our portfolio. The allowance for credit losses was $67.2 million, or 1.60%, of total loans outstanding at December 31, 2012, compared to $61.2 million, or 1.51%, at December 31, 2011. Nonperforming loans as a percentage of total loans decreased to 2.56% at December 31, 2012 from 2.76% at December 31, 2011. The allowance to nonperforming loan ratio was 62% as of December 31, 2012 and 2011. The decline in net charge-offs for the year contributed to the lower level of provision for credit losses for the year-ended December 31, 2012. Net credit losses were $14.6 million for the year-ended December 31, 2012 compared to $65.8 million for the same period in 2011. The most significant credit losses recognized during the year-ended December 31, 2012, were a $2.2 million partial charge-off of a construction loan for a Florida condominium project and a $1.2 million partial charge-off of a commercial borrower in the shallow gas well business. Net credit losses during the period did not include any other significant individual charge-offs. The provision is a result of management’s assessment of credit quality statistics and other factors that would have an impact on probable losses in the loan portfolio and the methodology used for determination of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses. The change in the allowance for credit losses is consistent with the increase in estimated losses within the loan portfolio determined by factors including certain loss events, portfolio migration analysis, historical loss experience, delinquency trends, deterioration in collateral values and volatility in the economy. Management believes that the allowance for credit losses is at a level deemed sufficient to absorb losses inherent in the loan portfolio at December 31, 2012. 31 ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued) Results of Operations—2012 Compared to 2011 (Continued) Provision for Credit Losses (Continued) A detailed analysis of our credit loss experience for the previous five years is shown below: 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 Loans outstanding at end of year . . . . . . . . . . $4,204,704 $4,057,055 $4,636,501 $4,418,377 (dollars in thousands) $4,218,083 Average loans outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $4,165,292 $4,061,822 $4,467,338 $4,557,227 $4,084,506 61,234 71,229 81,639 52,759 42,396 Balance, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loans charged off: Commercial, financial, agricultural and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Real estate construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . Residential real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Commercial real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loans to individuals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,207 3,601 3,828 851 3,482 Total loans charged off . . . . . . . . . 16,969 Recoveries of loans previously charged off: Commercial, financial, agricultural and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Real estate construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . Residential real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Commercial real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loans to individuals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total recoveries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net credit losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision charged to expense . . . . . . . . . . . . 443 582 422 410 521 2,378 14,591 20,544 7,114 28,886 4,107 24,861 3,325 68,293 473 955 132 349 573 2,482 65,811 55,816 22,293 41,483 5,226 2,466 3,841 75,309 2,409 0 252 163 523 3,347 71,962 61,552 20,536 36,892 4,604 7,302 4,378 73,712 448 0 81 914 580 2,023 71,689 100,569 3,640 67 2,529 3,479 4,166 13,881 426 0 14 187 522 1,149 12,732 23,095 Balance, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 67,187 $ 61,234 $ 71,229 $ 81,639 $ 52,759 Ratios: Net credit losses as a percentage of average loans outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.35% 1.62% 1.61% 1.57% 0.31% Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of end-of-period loans outstanding . . . . . . 1.60% 1.51% 1.69% 1.76% 1.19% 32 ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued) Results of Operations—2012 Compared to 2011 (Continued) Noninterest Income The components of noninterest income for each year in the three-year period ended December 31 are as follows: 2012 2011 2010 $ Change % Change 2012 compared to 2011 (dollars in thousands) Noninterest Income: Trust income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Service charges on deposit accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Insurance and retail brokerage commissions . . . . . . . . Income from bank owned life insurance . . . . . . . . . . . Card related interchange income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net impairment losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net securities gains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gain on sale of assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Derivatives mark to market $ 6,206 14,743 6,272 5,850 13,199 13,610 59,880 0 192 4,607 755 $ 6,498 14,775 6,376 5,596 11,968 12,803 $ 5,897 16,968 6,369 5,331 10,459 10,016 58,016 0 2,185 4,155 (6,687) 55,040 (9,193) 2,422 824 141 $ (292) (32) (104) 254 1,231 807 1,864 0 (1,993) 452 7,442 (4)% (0) (2) 5 10 6 3 0 (91) 11 (111) Total noninterest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $65,434 $57,669 $49,234 $ 7,765 13% Noninterest income, excluding gains and losses on sales, impairment losses on assets and derivatives mark to market increased $1.9 million, or 3%, in 2012. The most significant changes included increases in card related interchange income and other income. The increase in card related interchange income can be attributed to both growth in the number deposit customers as well as continued increases in electronic payments by our customers. The increase in other income is primarily attributable to a $1.9 million termination fee related to the dissolution of a mortgage banking joint venture with another financial institution. As a result, the Company is exploring other strategic options related to the origination of residential mortgages. Also contributing to the increase in other income are fees earned on interest rate swaps. The fees earned on these swaps are based on the notional value of the initiated contracts. In comparison, 14 swaps with a notional value of $117.2 million were entered into during the year-ended December 31, 2012 and provided income of $1.3 million, while 9 swaps with a notional value of $44.9 million were entered into during the same period in 2011, providing income of $0.6 million. Offsetting these increases in other income was a decrease of $0.9 million in letter of credit fees. Total noninterest income increased $7.8 million or 13%. The most notable change in this total is a $7.4 million increase in the mark-to-market adjustment recognized on derivatives. This increase is primarily the result of $0.8 million of income recognized in relation to the mark-to-market adjustment on interest rate derivatives during 2012 while a $6.7 million decline in income was recognized during the same period in 2011. The 2011decline in income was the result of an adverse mark-to-market adjustment related to credit deterioration for one commercial relationship. The 2012 income is a result of changes in the credit default curves over time as well as improvement in the counterparty credit risk related to one interest rate swap. The gain on sale of assets for the year 2012 totaled $4.6 million, of which $2.9 million related to the sale of three loans transferred to held for sale in the fourth quarter of 2011. The sale of these loans were completed in the first and second quarters of 2012. For the year 2011, the gain on sale of assets included a $1.1 million gain on the sale of a private equity investment and $2.4 million in gains related to the sale of other real estate owned. Comparing the year 2012 to the year 2011, net securities gains decreased $2.0 million as the result of a $1.5 million gain recognized in 2011 from the sale of an equity security. 33 ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued) Results of Operations—2012 Compared to 2011 (Continued) Noninterest Expense The components of noninterest expense for each year in the three-year period ended December 31 are as follows: 2012 2011 2010 $ Change % Change 2012 compared to 2011 (dollars in thousands) Noninterest Expense: Salaries and employee benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net occupancy expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Furniture and equipment expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Data processing expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pennsylvania shares tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intangible amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Collection and repossession expense . . . . . . . . . . . Other professional fees and services . . . . . . . . . . . . FDIC insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss on sale or write-down of assets . . . . . . . . . . . Operational losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 86,069 13,255 12,460 7,054 5,706 1,467 5,756 4,329 5,032 24,318 165,446 7,394 4,367 $ 84,669 14,069 12,517 6,027 5,480 1,534 7,583 5,297 5,490 23,953 166,619 9,428 779 $ 84,988 14,271 12,568 5,671 5,455 2,031 4,430 4,131 7,948 26,437 167,930 2,715 581 $ 1,400 (814) (57) 1,027 226 (67) (1,827) (968) (458) 365 (1,173) (2,034) 3,588 2% (6) (0) 17 4 (4) (24) (18) (8) 2 (1) (22) 461 Total noninterest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $177,207 $176,826 $171,226 $ 381 0% Total noninterest expense remained relatively consistent for the year 2012 in comparison to the year 2011. However, several categories reflected large variances in the level of expense. During the third quarter of 2012, the Company experienced a $3.5 million charge in connection with fraudulent wire transfers involving the breach of a commercial client’s computer system to gain access to our online banking system. However, there was no breach to our systems. The full amount of the loss has been recognized and an insurance claim, with up to a $0.5 million deductible, has been filed. The outcome of that claim has not been determined, therefore a receivable has not been recognized. In addition, various recovery strategies are currently being pursued. Salary and employee benefits expense increased compared to the same period of 2011 as a result of normal merit increases, the hiring of additional business development professionals and higher levels of employee incentive payments related to increased loan and deposit volumes. New loans originated during the year-ended December 31, 2012 totaled $1.3 billion compared to $1.0 billion in the same period of 2011. The number of full- time equivalent employees decreased 47 positions from 1,442 at December 31, 2011 to 1,395 at December 31, 2012. Increases in data processing expense can be attributed primarily to increased costs related to the higher level of customer debit card usage as electronic transactions continue to increase year over year. Collection and repossession expense decreased in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to the resolution of certain problem credits. Although the loss on sale or write-down of assets decreased for the year 2012, it remains high compared to historical levels. The expense for the year 2012 is primarily related to write-downs taken on three OREO properties upon receipt of updated appraisals. 34 ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued) Results of Operations—2012 Compared to 2011 (Continued) Income Tax The provision for income taxes was $14.7 million in 2012 compared to a benefit of $0.4 million in 2011 mostly due to a 280% or $41.7 million increase in pretax income. The effective tax rate was 26% for the tax expense in 2012 and 3% for the tax benefit in 2011. We ordinarily generate an annual effective tax rate that is less than the statutory rate of 35% due to benefits resulting from tax- exempt interest, income from bank owned life insurance and tax benefits associated with low income housing tax credits, which are relatively consistent regardless of the level of pretax income. The consistent level of tax benefits that reduce our tax rate below the 35% statutory rate and the relatively low level of annual pretax income produced a low effective tax rate for 2012 and a tax benefit for 2011. Financial Condition First Commonwealth’s total assets increased by $154.3 million in 2012. Loans increased $161.1 million, or 4%, and investments increased $28.5 million, or 2%. Factors impacting loan growth include underwriting guidelines which limit geography and size for commercial loans, our goal to manage down large credit relationships, generally weak borrower demand and expected declines in the 1-4 family mortgage loan portfolio. Underwriting guidelines provide little flexibility on exceptions and robust monitoring for loan to value, cash flow coverage, debt/equity and other credit quality measurement tools. Geographic limitations include restricting consumer and small business loans to Pennsylvania counties in which First Commonwealth has a branch or loan production office presence; commercial real estate and commercial loan markets were prescribed within a 250 mile radius of First Commonwealth’s headquarters location in Indiana, Pennsylvania. Commercial and industrial loan syndications are unlimited geographically in the United States for select, high quality industry segments in which we have expertise. In 2005, First Commonwealth implemented a strategic decision to exit the residential mortgage business, satisfying customer requests for these loans through a joint venture or home equity loans. As a result, the residential mortgage portfolio is projected to decline approximately $60 million annually, consistent with 2012, through regularly scheduled repayments and payoffs. In 2012, the mortgage banking joint venture was terminated and other strategic alternatives for the offering of mortgage related products are currently being evaluated. During 2012, approximately $574.8 million in investments securities were called or matured. These securities were higher yielding securities and contributed to the decline in yield earned on the portfolio. As a result, $354.8 million in asset-backed securities and $250.6 million in agency securities were purchased in 2012 to help increase earnings from the portfolio with a reduced risk profile. First Commonwealth’s total liabilities increased $166.8 million, or 3%, in 2012. Deposit growth of $53.2 million, or 1%, was augmented by an increase in short-term borrowings of $43.5 million, or 14 % and an increase in long- term debt of $72.8 million, or 72%. We periodically utilize short-term and long-term borrowings to fund the origination of new loans as well as the purchase of investments. Long-term borrowings were obtained in 2012 as an asset / liability management strategy to mitigate the risk of higher rates in the future and to take advantage of attractive interest rates in the wholesale funding market. The decrease in interest paid on borrowings as well as lower rates being paid on deposits has helped to mitigate the contracting pressure on the net interest yield on interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. 35 ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued) Financial Condition (Continued) Loan Portfolio Following is a summary of our loan portfolio as of December 31: 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 Amount % Amount % Amount % Amount % Amount % (dollars in thousands) Commercial, financial, agricultural and other . . . . . . . $1,019,822 24% $ 996,739 25% $ 913,814 22% $1,127,320 25% $1,146,411 26% Real estate construction . . . . . . . . 2 Residential real estate . . . . . . . . . 1,241,565 30 Commercial real estate . . . . . . . . 1,273,661 30 582,218 14 Loans to individuals . . . . . . . . . . 87,438 76,564 2 1,137,059 28 1,267,432 31 565,849 14 261,482 6 1,127,273 27 1,354,074 32 561,440 13 428,744 9 1,202,386 26 1,320,715 28 557,336 12 528,841 12 1,199,819 27 1,047,506 24 495,800 11 Total loans and leases net of unearned income . . . . . . . $4,204,704 100% $4,043,643 100% $4,218,083 100% $4,636,501 100% $4,418,377 100% The loan portfolio totaled $4.2 billion as of December 31, 2012, reflecting growth of $161.1 million or 4% compared to December 31, 2011. Loan growth was experienced in all categories, with the majority being recognized in the residential real estate portfolio as a result of a successful promotion related to our installment home equity product. Increases in commercial, financial, agricultural and other portfolio can be attributed to growth in direct middle market lending and syndications in Pennsylvania and contiguous states, while loans to individuals increased as a result of growth in indirect auto lending. The majority of our loan portfolio is with borrowers located in Pennsylvania. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, there were no concentrations of loans relating to any industry in excess of 10% of total loans. As of December 31, 2012, criticized loans or loans designated OAEM, substandard, impaired or doubtful decreased $3.5 million, or 1%, from December 31, 2011. Criticized loans totaled $288.5 million at December 31, 2012 and represented 7% of the total loan portfolio. Additionally, delinquency on accruing loans decreased $13.7 million, or 39%, at December 31, 2012 compared to December 31, 2011. Of this amount, $6.7 million relates to delinquent consumer loans which were moved to nonaccrual status while the remainder of the decrease is the result of charge-offs, paydowns or payoffs of the loan balance. As of December 31, 2012, nonaccrual loans increased $16.0 million, or 2%, compared to December 31, 2011 partially due to the addition of the $6.7 million of consumer loans moved to nonaccrual status. Total gross charge-offs for the year ended December 31, 2012 were $17.0 million. 36 ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued) Financial Condition (Continued) Loan Portfolio (Continued) Final loan maturities and rate sensitivities of the loan portfolio excluding consumer installment and mortgage loans and before unearned income at December 31, 2012 were as follows: Within One Year One to 5 Years After 5 Years Total (dollars in thousands) Commercial, financial, agricultural and other . . . . . . . . . . . . Real estate construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Commercial real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 40,765 10,308 148,222 8,959 $ 663,575 51,340 425,608 23,431 $ 210,718 25,790 699,831 72,374 $ 915,058 87,438 1,273,661 104,764 Totals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $208,254 $1,163,954 $1,008,713 $2,380,921 Loans at fixed interest rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loans at variable interest rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 261,926 902,028 $ 184,074 824,639 Totals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,163,954 $1,008,713 (a) The maturity of real estate construction loans include term commitments that follow the construction period. Loans with these term commitments will be moved to the commercial real estate category when the construction phase of the project is completed. First Commonwealth has a regulatory established legal lending limit of $103.7 million to any one borrower or closely related group of borrowers, but has established lower thresholds for credit risk management. Nonperforming Loans Nonperforming loans include nonaccrual loans and restructured loans. Nonaccrual loans represent loans on which interest accruals have been discontinued. Restructured loans are those loans whose terms have been renegotiated to provide a reduction or deferral of principal or interest as a result of the deteriorating financial position of the borrower under terms not available in the market. We discontinue interest accruals on a loan when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to fully collect principal or interest due according to the contractual terms of the loan. A loan is typically placed in nonaccrual status when there is evidence of a significantly weakened financial condition or principal and interest is 90 days or more delinquent, except for consumer loans which are placed in nonaccrual status at 150 days past due. Interest received on a nonaccrual loan is normally applied as a reduction to loan principal rather than interest income utilizing the cost recovery methodology of revenue recognition. Nonperforming loans are closely monitored on an ongoing basis as part of our loan review and work-out process. The probable risk of loss on these loans is evaluated by comparing the loan balance to the fair value of any underlying collateral or the present value of projected future cash flows. Losses are recognized when a loss is probable and the amount is reasonably estimable. 37 ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued) Financial Condition (Continued) Nonperforming Loans (Continued) The following is a comparison of nonperforming and impaired assets and the effects on interest due to nonaccrual loans for the period ended December 31: Nonperforming Loans: Loans on nonaccrual basis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loans held for sale on nonaccrual basis . . . . Troubled debt restructured loans on 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 (dollars in thousands) $ 43,539 0 $ 33,635 13,412 $ 84,741 0 $ 147,937 0 $ 55,922 0 nonaccrual basis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50,979 44,841 31,410 Troubled debt restructured loans on accrual basis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,037 20,276 1,336 0 619 0 132 Total nonperforming loans . . . . . . . . . . $ 107,555 $ 112,164 $ 117,487 $ 148,556 $ 56,054 Loans past due in excess of 90 days and still accruing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other real estate owned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loans outstanding at end of period . . . . . . . . Average loans outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nonperforming loans as a percentage of total loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for credit losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Allowance for credit losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net charge-offs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for credit losses as a percentage of net charge-offs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Allowance for credit losses as a percentage 2,447 $ $ 11,262 $4,204,704 $4,165,292 11,015 $ $ 30,035 $4,057,055 $4,061,822 13,203 $ $ 24,700 $4,218,083 $4,467,338 15,154 $ $ 24,287 $4,636,501 $4,557,227 16,189 $ $ 3,262 $4,418,377 $4,084,506 2.56% 2.76% 2.79% 3.20% 1.27% $ $ $ 20,544 67,187 14,591 $ $ $ 55,816 61,234 65,811 $ $ $ 61,552 71,229 71,962 $ 100,569 81,639 $ 71,689 $ $ $ $ 23,095 52,759 12,732 0.35% 1.62% 1.61% 1.57% 0.31% 140.80% 84.81% 85.53% 140.29% 181.39% of end-of-period loans outstanding (a) . . . 1.60% 1.51% 1.69% 1.76% 1.19% Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of nonperforming loans (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross income that would have been recorded at original rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest that was reflected in income . . . . . . . Net reduction to interest income due to 62.47% 62.01% 60.63% 54.96% 94.12% $ 15,036 369 $ 14,872 1,393 $ 13,142 30 $ $ 7,645 13 6,273 9 nonaccrual . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 14,667 $ 13,479 $ 13,112 $ 7,632 $ 6,264 (a) End of period loans and nonperforming loans exclude loans held for sale. Nonperforming loans decreased $4.6 million to $107.6 million at December 31, 2012 compared to $112.2 million at December 31, 2011. The nonperforming loans as a percentage of total loans decreased to 2.6% from 2.8% at December 31, 2012 compared to December 31, 2011. Other real estate owned totaled $11.3 million at December 31, 2012, a decrease of $18.7 million compared to the $30.0 million balance at December 31, 2011. The most significant change in OREO during 2012 includes $7.0 million in write-downs as a result of updated 38 ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued) Financial Condition (Continued) Nonperforming Loans (Continued) appraisals on the foreclosed properties and $6.5 million in proceeds received from the sale of a western Pennsylvania office complex. The most significant addition to OREO during 2012 was a $1.2 million parcel of land. Also included in nonperforming loans are troubled debt restructured loans (“TDR’s”). TDR’s are those loans whose terms have been renegotiated to provide a reduction or deferral of principal or interest as a result of the deteriorating financial position of the borrower under terms not available in the market. The $7.2 million decrease in accruing TDR’s during 2012 is primarily the result of an $11.3 million payoff of a loan to a waste management company in January 2012. Offsetting this decrease are new accruing TDR’s including a $3.4 million loan to a gas well servicing operation and a $3.2 million commercial real estate loan. For additional information on TDR’s please refer to Note 12 “Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses.” Net credit losses were $14.6 million in 2012 compared to $65.8 million for the year 2011. The most significant credit losses recognized during the year were a $2.2 million partial charge-off of a construction loan for a Florida condominium project and a $1.2 million partial charge-off of a commercial borrower in the shallow gas well business. Additional detail on credit risk is included in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” under “Credit Risk” on page 47. Provision for credit losses as a percentage of net charge-offs increased from 84.81% for the year ended December 31, 2011 to 140.80% for the year ended December 31, 2012, due to the decline in the amount of charge-offs recognized year over year. Nonperforming Securities The following is a comparison of nonperforming securities for the period ended December 31: 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 (dollars in thousands) Nonperforming Securities: Nonaccrual securities at market value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $0 $0 $15,823 $3,258 $0 As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, none of the pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations were considered to be nonperforming securities. These securities were returned to performing status in 2011 because of evidence supporting management’s estimate of future cash flows indicating that all remaining principal and interest will be received. Support for these estimates include; no other-than-temporary impairment charges since the third quarter of 2010, improvement in the underlying collateral of these bonds evidenced by a reduced level of new interest payment deferrals and principal defaults as well as an increase in actual cures of deferring collateral. 39 ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued) Financial Condition (Continued) Allowance for Credit Losses Following is a summary of the allocation of the allowance for credit losses at December 31: 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 Allowance Amount % (a) Allowance Amount % (a) Allowance Amount % (a) Allowance Amount % (a) Allowance Amount % (a) (dollars in thousands) Commercial, financial, 26% 25% $17,558 22% $31,369 25% $21,700 24% $18,200 agricultural and other . . . . . . . $19,852 12 12,961 9 18,224 6 18,002 2 6,756 2 8,928 27 4,347 26 5,847 27 5,454 28 8,237 30 5,908 24 9,424 28 17,526 32 16,913 31 18,961 30 22,441 11 4,195 12 4,731 13 4,215 14 4,244 14 4,132 4,274 N/A 3,942 N/A 4,945 N/A 4,836 N/A 5,926 N/A Real estate construction . . . . . . . Residential real estate . . . . . . . . Commerical real estate . . . . . . . Loans to individuals . . . . . . . . . . Unallocated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $67,187 $61,234 $71,229 $81,639 $52,759 Allowance for credit losses as percentage of end-of-period loans outstanding . . . . . . . . . . 1.60% 1.51% 1.69% 1.76% 1.19% (a) Represents the percentage of loans in each category to total loans. The allowance for credit losses increased $6.0 million from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2012 and the allowance for credit losses as a percentage of end-of-period loans outstanding was 1.60% at December 31, 2012 compared to 1.51% at December 31, 2011. The majority of the 2012 change in the allowance for credit losses, or $4.4 million of the total $6.0 million change, can be attributed to $5.3 million in specific reserves established for two commercial real estate loans. The allowance for credit losses includes both a general reserve for performing loans and specific reserves for nonperforming loans. Comparing December 31, 2012 to December 31, 2011, the general reserve for performing loans decreased from 1.21% to 1.19% of total performing loans. Specific reserves increased from 13.4% of nonperforming loans at December 31, 2011 to 16.5% of nonperforming loans at December 31, 2012. The increase in specific reserves held is a direct result of the previously mentioned commercial real estate loans as well as $4.9 million in specific reserves established for three commercial, financial, agricultural and other loans. The allowance for credit losses as a percentage of nonperforming loans was 62% at both December 31, 2012 and 2011. The allowance for credit losses represents management’s estimate of probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio at a specific point in time. This estimate includes losses associated with specifically identified loans, as well as estimated probable credit losses inherent in the remainder of the loan portfolio. Additions are made to the allowance through both periodic provisions charged to income and recoveries of losses previously incurred. Reductions to the allowance occur as loans are charged off. Management evaluates the adequacy of the allowance at least quarterly, and in doing so relies on various factors including, but not limited to, assessment of historical loss experience, delinquency and nonaccrual trends, portfolio growth, net realizable value of collateral and current economic conditions. This evaluation is subjective and requires material estimates that may change over time. For a description of the methodology used to calculate the allowance for credit losses, please refer to “Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Accounting Estimates—Allowance for Credit Losses.” Management reviews local and national economic information and industry data, including the trends in the industries we believe are indicative of higher risk to our portfolio. Factors reviewed by management include 40 ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued) Financial Condition (Continued) Allowance for Credit Losses (Continued) employment trends, macroeconomic trends, commercial real estate trends and the overall lending environment. Based on this review, an allocation is made to the allowance for credit and is reflected in the “unallocated” line of the previous table. Investment Portfolio Marketable securities that we hold in our investment portfolio, which are classified as “securities available for sale,” may be a source of liquidity; however, we do not anticipate liquidating the investments prior to maturity. As indicated in Note 21 “Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities,” $24.8 million of available for sale securities at December 31, 2012, are classified as Level 3 assets because of inactivity in the market. Following is a detail schedule of the amortized cost of securities available for sale as of December 31: 2012 2011 2010 (dollars in thousands) Obligations of U.S. Government Agencies: Mortgage-Backed Securities—Residential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 27,883 $ 32,139 $ 36,719 Obligations of U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mortgage-Backed Securities—Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities—Commercial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other Government-Sponsored Enterprises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Corporate Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pooled Trust Preferred Collateralized Debt Obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 839,102 148 241,970 82 6,703 51,866 771,196 193 267,807 444 11,811 54,762 Total Debt Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,167,754 1,859 1,138,352 1,860 618,454 233 184,531 47,175 21,226 58,780 967,118 5,137 Total Securities Available for Sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,169,613 $1,140,212 $972,255 As of December 31, 2012, securities available for sale had a fair value of $1.2 billion. Gross unrealized gains were $30.7 million and gross unrealized losses were $29.0 million. The following is a schedule of the contractual maturity distribution of securities available for sale at December 31, 2012. U.S. Government Agencies and Corporations Within 1 year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . After 1 but within 5 years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . After 5 but within 10 years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . After 10 years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,397 255,804 95,716 754,186 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,109,103 States and Political Subdivisions Other Securities Total Amortized Cost (a) Weighted Average Yield* (dollars in thousands) $ 0 82 0 0 $82 $ 0 0 0 58,569 $ 3,397 255,886 95,716 812,755 $58,569 $1,167,754 4.11% 1.03 4.16 2.78 2.51% (a) Equities are excluded from this schedule because they have an indefinite maturity. * Yields are calculated on a taxable equivalent basis. 41 ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued) Financial Condition (Continued) Investment Portfolio (Continued) Mortgage backed securities, which include mortgage backed obligations of U.S. Government agencies and obligations of U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises, have contractual maturities ranging from less than one year to approximately 30 years and have anticipated average lives to maturity ranging from less than one year to approximately thirteen years. The amortized cost of the investment portfolio increased $29.4 million, or 2.6%, at December 31, 2012 compared to December 31, 2011. All categories of investments decreased, except for Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored enterprises which increased $42.0 million, or 4%. These securities were purchased in an effort to increase the earnings from investments while keeping the risk of the portfolio at a lower level. Our investment portfolio includes an amortized cost of $51.9 million in pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations at December 31, 2012. The valuation of these securities involves evaluating relevant credit and structural aspects, determining appropriate performance assumptions and performing a discounted cash flow analysis. See Note 8 “Securities Available for Sale,” Note 9 “Securities Held to Maturity,” Note 10 “Other Investments,” Note 11 “Impairment of Investment Securities,” and Note 21 “Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities” for additional information related to the investment portfolio. Deposits Total deposits increased $53.2 million, or 1%, in 2012, primarily due to an increase in lower cost transaction and savings deposits of $218.1 million, offset by a decrease in time deposits of $164.9 million. As the interest rate paid on deposits remains at historically low levels, customers continue to migrate towards shorter term, more liquid investments. Time deposits of $100 thousand or more had remaining maturities as follows as of the end of each year in the three-year period ended December 31: 2012 2011 2010 Amount % Amount % Amount % (dollars in thousands) 3 months or less . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Over 3 months through 6 months . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Over 6 months through 12 months . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Over 12 months . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $103,102 58,680 31,863 128,798 32% $ 76,356 43,299 18 10 50,296 151,213 40 24% $ 94,957 65,560 13 60,658 16 165,576 47 24% 17 16 43 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $322,443 100% $321,164 100% $386,751 100% Short-Term Borrowings and Long-Term Debt Short-term borrowings increased $43.5 million, or 14%, from $312.8 million as of December 31, 2011 to $356.2 million at December 31, 2012. Long-term debt increased $72.8 million, or 35%, from $207.4 million at December 31, 2011 to $280.2 million at December 31, 2012. The increase in both of these areas was to take advantage of attractive interest rates in the wholesale funding markets as an alternative to certificates of deposit. For additional information concerning our short-term borrowings, subordinated debentures and other long-term debt, please refer to Note 18 “Short-term Borrowings,” Note 19 “Subordinated Debentures” and Note 20 “Other Long-term Debt” of the Consolidated Financial Statements. 42 ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued) Financial Condition (Continued) Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements The table below sets forth our contractual obligations to make future payments as of December 31, 2012. For a more detailed description of each category of obligation, refer to the note in our Consolidated Financial Statements indicated in the table below. Footnote Number Reference 1 Year or Less FHLB Advances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Subordinated debentures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 19 15 $29,968 0 3,548 After 1 But Within 3 Years After 3 But Within 5 Years (dollars in thousands) $ 792 0 5,339 $137,822 0 6,163 After 5 Years Total $ 5,734 105,750 17,070 $174,316 105,750 32,120 Total contractual obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . $33,516 $143,985 $6,131 $128,554 $312,186 The table above excludes unamortized premiums and discounts on FHLB advances because these premiums and discounts do not represent future cash obligations. The table also excludes our cash obligations upon maturity of certificates of deposit, which is set forth in Note 17 “Interest-Bearing Deposits” of the Consolidated Financial Statements. In addition, see Note 14 “Commitments and Letters of Credit” for detail related to our off-balance sheet commitments to extend credit, financial standby letters of credit, performance standby letters of credit and commercial letters of credit as of December 31, 2012. Commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and commercial letters of credit do not necessarily represent future cash requirements since it is unknown if the borrower will draw upon these commitments and often these commitments expire without being drawn upon. As of December 31, 2012, a reserve for probable losses of $2.4 million was recorded for unused commitments and letters of credit. Liquidity Liquidity refers to our ability to meet the cash flow requirements of depositors and borrowers as well as our operating cash needs with cost-effective funding. Liquidity risk arises from the possibility that we may not be able to meet our financial obligations and operating cash needs or may become overly reliant upon external funding sources. In order to manage this risk, our Board of Directors has established a Liquidity Policy that identifies primary sources of liquidity, establishes procedures for monitoring and measuring liquidity and quantifies minimum liquidity requirements based on limits approved by our Board of Directors. This policy designates our Asset/Liability Committee (“ALCO”) as the body responsible for meeting these objectives. The ALCO, which includes members of executive management, reviews liquidity on a periodic basis and approves significant changes in strategies that affect balance sheet or cash flow positions. Liquidity is centrally managed on a daily basis by our Treasury Department who monitors it by using such measures as liquidity coverage ratios, liquidity gap ratios and noncore funding ratios. We generate funds to meet our cash flow needs primarily through the core deposit base of FCB and the maturity or repayment of loans and other interest-earning assets, including investments. Core deposits are the most stable source of liquidity a bank can have due to the long-term relationship with a deposit customer. The level of deposits during any period is sometimes influenced by factors outside of management’s control, such as the level of short-term and long-term market interest rates and yields offered on competing investments, such as money 43 ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued) Liquidity (Continued) market mutual funds. Deposits increased $53.2 million, or 1%, during 2012, and comprised 87% of total liabilities at December 31, 2012, as compared to 89% at December 31, 2011. Proceeds from the maturity and redemption of investment securities totaled $574.8 million during 2012 and provided liquidity to fund loans as well as the purchase of additional investment securities. We also have available unused wholesale sources of liquidity, including overnight federal funds and repurchase agreements, advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh, borrowings through the discount window at the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland and access to certificates of deposit through brokers. We have increased our borrowing capacity at the Federal Reserve by establishing a Borrower-in-Custody of Collateral arrangement that enables us to pledge certain loans, not being used as collateral at the Federal Home Loan Bank, as collateral for borrowings at the Federal Reserve. At December 31, 2012 our borrowing capacity at the Federal Reserve related to this program was $795.2 million and there were no amounts outstanding. Additionally, as of December 31, 2012, our maximum borrowing capacity at the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh was $1.4 billion and as of that date amounts used against this capacity included $352.4 million in outstanding borrowings and $26.0 million in letter of credit commitments used for pledging public funds and other non-deposit purposes. We participate in the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Services (“CDARS”) program as part of an ALCO strategy to increase and diversify funding sources. As of December 31, 2012, our maximum borrowing capacity under this program was $892.8 million and as of that date there was $70.2 million outstanding. We also participate in a reciprocal program which allows our depositors to receive expanded FDIC coverage by placing multiple certificates of deposit at other CDARS member banks. As of December 31, 2012, our outstanding certificates of deposits from this program have an average weighted rate of 0.31% and an average original term of 95 days. First Commonwealth has an unsecured $15.0 million line of credit with another financial institution. There are no amounts outstanding on this line as of December 31, 2012. As of December 31, 2012, we are in compliance with all debt covenants related to this agreement. Refer to “Financial Condition” above for additional information concerning our deposits, loan portfolio, investment securities and borrowings. Market Risk Market risk refers to potential losses arising from changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity prices and commodity prices. Our market risk is composed primarily of interest rate risk. Interest rate risk is comprised of repricing risk, basis risk, yield curve risk and options risk. Repricing risk arises from differences in the cash flow or repricing between asset and liability portfolios. Basis risk arises when asset and liability portfolios are related to different market rate indices, which do not always change by the same amount. Yield curve risk arises when asset and liability portfolios are related to different maturities on a given yield curve; when the yield curve changes shape, the risk position is altered. Options risk arises from “embedded options” within asset and liability products as certain borrowers have the option to prepay their loans when rates fall, while certain depositors can redeem or withdraw their deposits early when rates rise. The process by which we manage our interest rate risk is called asset/liability management. The goals of our asset/liability management are increasing net interest income without taking undue interest rate risk or material loss of net market value of our equity, while maintaining adequate liquidity. Net interest income is increased by growing earning assets and increasing the difference between the rate earned on earning assets and the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Liquidity is measured by the ability to meet both depositors’ and credit customers’ requirements. 44 ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued) Market Risk (Continued) We use an asset/liability model to measure our interest rate risk. Interest rate risk measures include earnings simulation and gap analysis. Gap analysis is a static measure that does not incorporate assumptions regarding future business. Gap analysis, while a helpful diagnostic tool, displays cash flows for only a single rate environment. Net interest income simulations explicitly measure the exposure to earnings from changes in market rates of interest. Our current financial position is combined with assumptions regarding future business to calculate net interest income under various hypothetical rate scenarios. Our net interest income simulations assume a level balance sheet whereby new volumes equal run-offs. The ALCO reviews earnings simulations over multiple years under various interest rate scenarios. Reviewing these various measures provides us with a reasonably comprehensive view of our interest rate profile. The following gap analysis compares the difference between the amount of interest-earning assets and interest- bearing liabilities subject to repricing over a period of time. The ratio of rate sensitive assets to rate sensitive liabilities repricing within a one year period was 0.76 at both December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. A ratio of less than one indicates a higher level of repricing liabilities over repricing assets over the next twelve months. Gap analysis has limitations due to the static nature of the model that holds volumes and consumer behaviors constant in all economic and interest rate scenarios. Rate sensitive assets to rate sensitive liabilities repricing in one year would indicate reduced net interest income in a rising interest rate scenario, and conversely, increased net interest income in a declining interest rate scenario. Following is the gap analysis as of December 31: 2012 0-90 Days 91-180 Days 181-365 Days Cumulative 0-365 Days (dollars in thousands) Over 1 Year Through 5 Years Over 5 Years Loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other interest-earning assets . . . . . . $ 1,950,002 61,914 4,258 $222,705 78,904 0 $297,530 142,411 0 $2,470,237 283,229 4,258 $1,436,472 579,320 0 $203,477 328,546 0 Total interest-sensitive assets (ISA) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,016,174 301,609 439,941 2,757,724 2,015,792 532,023 Certificates of deposit . . . . . . . . . . . Other deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208,096 2,641,953 428,545 176,556 0 29,703 126,490 0 230 511,142 2,641,953 458,478 512,040 0 138,652 9,477 0 39,318 Total interest-sensitive liabilities (ISL) . . . . . . . . . . 3,278,594 206,259 126,720 3,611,573 650,692 48,795 Gap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(1,262,420) $ 95,350 $313,221 $ (853,849) $1,365,100 $483,228 ISA/ISL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gap/Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.61 21.06% 1.46 1.59% 3.47 5.23% 0.76 14.24% 3.10 22.77% 10.90 8.06% 45 ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued) Market Risk (Continued) 2011 0-90 Days 91-180 Days 181-365 Days Cumulative 0-365 Days (dollars in thousands) Over 1 Year Through 5 Years Over 5 Years Loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,859,623 $156,447 $287,873 $2,303,943 $1,486,729 $174,495 320,739 Investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 Other interest-earning assets . . . . . . . . 418,413 0 107,723 0 125,112 3,511 205,335 0 438,170 3,511 Total interest-sensitive assets (ISA) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,988,246 264,170 493,208 2,745,624 1,905,142 495,234 Certificates of deposit . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154,218 2,526,747 386,683 192,154 0 25,147 323,085 0 299 669,457 2,526,747 412,129 517,572 0 68,334 10,531 0 39,728 Total interest-sensitive liabilities (ISL) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,067,648 217,301 323,384 3,608,333 585,906 50,259 Gap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(1,079,402) $ 46,869 $169,824 $ (862,709) $1,319,236 $444,975 ISA/ISL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gap/Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.65 18.48% 1.22 0.80% 1.53 2.91% 0.76 14.77% 3.25 22.59% 9.85 7.62% The following table presents an analysis of the potential sensitivity of our annual net interest income to gradual changes in interest rates over a 12 month time frame versus if rates remained unchanged utilizing a flat balance sheet. December 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net interest income change (12 months) -200 -100 +100 +200 (dollars in thousands) $(8,204) $(4,767) $459 704 (7,787) (3,997) $2,153 2,324 The analysis and model used to quantify the sensitivity of our net interest income becomes less reliable in a decreasing 200 basis point scenario given the current unprecedented low interest rate environment. Results of the 100 and 200 basis point decline in interest rate scenario is affected by the fact that many of our interest-bearing liabilities are at rates below 1% and therefore cannot decline 100 or 200 basis points, yet our interest-sensitive assets are able to decline by these amounts. For the years 2012 and 2011, the cost of our interest-bearing liabilities averaged 0.70% and 0.99%, respectively and the yield on our average interest-earning assets, on a fully taxable equivalent basis, averaged 4.18% and 4.61%, respectively. The ALCO is responsible for the identification and management of interest rate risk exposure. As such, the ALCO continuously evaluates strategies to manage our exposure to interest rate fluctuations. Asset/liability models require certain assumptions be made, such as prepayment rates on earning assets and pricing impact on non-maturity deposits, which may differ from actual experience. These business assumptions are based upon our experience, business plans and published industry experience. While management believes such assumptions to be reasonable, there can be no assurance that modeled results will approximate actual results. 46 ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued) Credit Risk First Commonwealth maintains an allowance for credit losses at a level deemed sufficient to absorb losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the date of each statement of financial condition. Management reviews the adequacy of the allowance on a quarterly basis to ensure that the provision for credit losses has been charged against earnings in an amount necessary to maintain the allowance at a level that is appropriate based on management’s assessment of probable estimated losses. First Commonwealth’s methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance for credit losses consists of several key elements. These elements include an assessment of individual impaired loans with a balance greater than $0.1 million, loss experience trends, delinquency and other relevant factors. While allocations are made to specific loans and pools of loans, the total allowance is available for all loan losses. First Commonwealth also maintains a reserve for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit based upon credit risk and probability of funding. The reserve totaled $2.4 million at December 31, 2012, and is classified in “Other liabilities” on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Nonperforming loans include nonaccrual loans and loans classified as troubled debt restructured loans. Nonaccrual loans represent loans on which interest accruals have been discontinued. Troubled debt restructured loans are those loans whose terms have been renegotiated to provide a reduction or deferral of principal or interest as a result of the deteriorating financial position of the borrower, who could not obtain comparable terms from alternate financing sources. In 2012, 60 loans totaling $21.9 million were identified as troubled debt restructurings resulting in specific reserves of $4.9 million. We discontinue interest accruals on a loan when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to fully collect principal or interest due according to the contractual terms of the loan. A loan is also placed in nonaccrual status when, based on regulatory definitions, the loan is maintained on a “cash basis” due to the weakened financial condition of the borrower. Generally, loans 90 days or more past due are placed on nonaccrual status, except for consumer loans which are placed in nonaccrual status at 150 days past due. Nonperforming loans are closely monitored on an ongoing basis as part of our loan review and work-out process. The probable risk of loss on these loans is evaluated by comparing the loan balance to the estimated fair value of any underlying collateral or the present value of projected future cash flows. Losses or specifically assigned allowance for credit losses are recognized where appropriate. The allowance for credit losses was $67.2 million at December 31, 2012 or 1.60% of loans outstanding compared to $61.2 million or 1.51% of loans outstanding at December 31, 2011. The increase in the 2012 ratio compared to the 2011 ratio can be primarily attributed to a $4.5 million increase in specific reserves on nonperforming loans. As of December 31, 2012, several credit measures showed improvement compared to December 31, 2011. The level of criticized loans decreased $3.5 million from $292.0 million at December 31, 2011 to $288.5 million at December 31, 2012 and delinquency on accruing loans for the same period declined $13.7 million, or 39%. The allowance for credit losses as a percentage of nonperforming loans was 62% at December 31, 2012 and 2011. The allowance for credit losses includes specific allocations of $17.8 million related to nonperforming loans covering 17% of the total nonperforming balance at December 31, 2012 and specific allocations of $13.2 million covering 13% of the total nonperforming balance at December 31, 2011. The amount of allowance related to nonperforming loans was determined by using estimated fair values obtained from current appraisals and updated discounted cash flow analyses. 47 ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued) Credit Risk (Continued) Management believes that the allowance for credit losses is at a level that is sufficient to absorb losses inherent in the loan portfolio at December 31, 2012. The following table provides information on net charge-offs and nonperforming loans by loan category: For the Year Ended December 31, 2012 As of December 31, 2012 % of Total Net Charge- offs Net Charge-offs as a % of Average Loans Net Charge-offs Nonperforming Loans % of Total Nonperforming Loans Nonperforming Loans as a % of Total Loans (dollars in thousands) Commercial, financial, agricultural and other . . . . . . . . Real estate construction . . . . . . . . Residential real estate . . . . . . . . . . Commerical real estate . . . . . . . . . Loans to individuals . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4,764 3,019 3,406 441 2,961 32.65% 0.12% 20.69 23.35 3.02 20.29 0.07 0.08 0.01 0.07 $ 34,612 11,247 10,623 50,817 256 32.18% 10.46 9.87 47.25 0.24 0.82% 0.27 0.25 1.21 0.01 Total loans, net of unearned income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $14,591 100.00% 0.35% $107,555 100.00% 2.56% As the above table illustrates, commercial real estate and commercial financial, agricultural and other loan categories were the most significant portions of the nonperforming loans as of December 31, 2012. See discussions related to the provision for credit losses and loans for more information. Results of Operations—2011 Compared to 2010 Summary of 2011 Results Net income for 2011 was $15.3 million, or $0.15 per diluted share, as compared to a net income of $23.0 million, or $0.25 per diluted share, in 2010. The decline in performance in 2011 was primarily the result of a $16.9 million decrease in net interest income, an increase of $6.7 million related to loss on sale or write-down of assets, and a $6.8 million increase in credit risk recognized on interest rate swaps. Partially offsetting the income declines are a $5.7 million decrease in provision for credit losses in 2011, a decrease of $9.2 million in other- than-temporary impairment losses related to our pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligation portfolio, a $3.3 million increase in gain on the sale of assets and a $2.5 million increase in income from other real estate owned. Our return on average equity was 2.0% and return on average assets was 0.27% for 2011, compared to 3.33% and 0.37%, respectively, for 2010. Average diluted shares for the year 2011 were 12% greater than the comparable period in 2010 primarily due to the issuance of 18.5 million shares of common stock in connection with a capital raise that was completed in August 2010. Net interest income, on a fully taxable equivalent basis, for 2011 was $20.6 million, or 10% lower than 2010, primarily due to a $427.1 million, or 8%, decline in average interest earning assets and an 8 basis point decrease in the net interest margin. Positively affecting net interest income in 2011 was a $121.2 million increase in average net free funds. Average net free funds are the excess of demand deposits, other noninterest-bearing liabilities and shareholders’ equity over nonearning assets. Net interest margin, on a fully taxable equivalent 48 ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued) Results of Operations—2011 Compared to 2010 (Continued) Summary of 2011 Results (Continued) basis was 3.80% in 2011 compared to 3.88% in 2010. The relatively stable net interest margin can be attributed to a more favorable deposit mix, lower costing deposits, reduced balance sheet leveraging and disciplined loan pricing. Interest and fees on loans, on a fully taxable equivalent basis, decreased $28.6 million of which $21.0 million is attributable to the previously mentioned decline in average balances and $7.6 million is the result of the yield on loans decreasing 19 basis points from 5.18% to 4.99%. Interest income on investment securities, on a fully taxable equivalent basis, decreased $11.9 million from 2010 of which $3.5 million is attributable to the previously mentioned decline in balances and $8.4 million is due to a 108 basis point decrease in yield from 4.34% to 3.26%. Contributing to the investment yield decline was the planned reduction in obligations of state and political subdivisions which had higher yields relative to the remainder of the portfolio. Interest expense on deposits decreased $16.3 million, of which $11.0 million is attributable to a decline in rates paid and $5.3 million is due to a change in average balances. The cost of interest-bearing deposits decreased 37 basis points as a result of lower interest rates and improved deposit mix changes. Total average interest-bearing deposits decreased $190.3 million, or 5%, primarily due to a decrease of $252.8 million, or 16%, in higher costing average time deposits, offset by an increase of $62.5 million, or 3%, in average interest-bearing demand and savings deposits. Average noninterest-bearing deposits increased $61.1 million, or 9.3%, in 2011. Interest expense on short-term borrowings declined $1.2 million primarily due to a $305.2 million decline in average balances while interest expense on long-term debt declined $2.4 million; $2.2 million as a result of the $52.8 million decrease in average balances and $0.2 million due to a 9 basis point decrease in rate. Net interest margin, on a fully taxable equivalent basis, for the year 2011 declined 8 basis points to 3.80% from 3.88%. The relatively stable net interest margin can be attributed to a more favorable deposit mix, lower costing deposits, reduced balance sheet leveraging and disciplined loan pricing. ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Information appearing in Item 7 of this report under the caption “Market Risk” is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item. 49 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING First Commonwealth is responsible for the preparation, the integrity, and the fair presentation of the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this annual report. The Consolidated Financial Statements and notes to the financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles and include some amounts based upon management’s best estimates and judgments. First Commonwealth’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f), that is designed to produce reliable financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including First Commonwealth’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, First Commonwealth conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations, including the possibility that a control can be circumvented and that misstatements due to error or fraud may occur without detection. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Based on First Commonwealth’s evaluation under the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework, management concluded that internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2012. The effectiveness of First Commonwealth’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012 has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their attestation report which is included herein. First Commonwealth Financial Corporation Indiana, Pennsylvania March 13, 2013 /s/ T. MICHAEL PRICE T. Michael Price President and Chief Executive Officer /s/ ROBERT E. ROUT Robert E. Rout Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer 50 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors and Stockholders First Commonwealth Financial Corporation: We have audited First Commonwealth Financial Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). First Commonwealth Financial Corporation’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying management’s report on internal control. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. In our opinion, First Commonwealth Financial Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control— Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statements of financial condition of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2012, and our report dated March 13, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. /s/ KPMG LLP Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania March 13, 2013 51 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors and Stockholders First Commonwealth Financial Corporation: We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2012. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2012, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), First Commonwealth Financial Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 13, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting. /s/ KPMG LLP Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania March 13, 2013 52 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION Assets Cash and due from banks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest-bearing bank deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Securities available for sale, at fair value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loans held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loans: Portfolio loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Allowance for credit losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Premises and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other real estate owned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortizing intangibles, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bank owned life insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Liabilities Deposits (all domestic): December 31, 2012 2011 (dollars in thousands, except share data) $ 98,724 4,258 1,171,303 28,228 0 $ 74,967 3,511 1,142,776 39,796 13,412 4,204,704 (67,187) 4,137,517 68,970 11,262 159,956 2,375 170,925 141,872 $5,995,390 4,043,643 (61,234) 3,982,409 66,755 30,035 159,956 3,843 167,576 156,086 $5,841,122 Noninterest-bearing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest-bearing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Short-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Subordinated debentures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 883,269 3,674,612 4,557,881 356,227 105,750 174,471 280,221 55,054 5,249,383 $ 780,377 3,724,307 4,504,684 312,777 105,750 101,664 207,414 57,704 5,082,579 Shareholders’ Equity Preferred stock, $1 par value per share, 3,000,000 shares authorized, none issued . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 Common stock, $1 par value per share, 200,000,000 shares authorized; 105,563,455 shares issued as of December 31, 2012 and 2011; and 99,629,494 shares and 104,916,994 shares outstanding at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Additional paid-in capital Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accumulated other comprehensive income, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Treasury stock (5,933,961 and 646,461 shares at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unearned ESOP shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105,563 365,354 315,608 1,259 105,563 365,868 294,056 2,001 (41,777) 0 746,007 $5,995,390 (7,345) (1,600) 758,543 $5,841,122 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements 53 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME Interest Income Interest and fees on loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest and dividends on investments: Taxable interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest exempt from federal income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest on bank deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest Expense Interest on deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest on short-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest on subordinated debentures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest on other long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total interest on long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net Interest Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for credit losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net Interest Income after Provision for Credit Losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Noninterest Income Changes in fair value on impaired securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Noncredit related (gains) losses on securities not expected to be sold (recognized in other comprehensive income) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net impairment losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net securities gains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Trust income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Service charges on deposit accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Insurance and retail brokerage commissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income from bank owned life insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gain on sale of assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Card related interchange income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Derivative mark to market . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total noninterest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Noninterest Expense Salaries and employee benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net occupancy expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Furniture and equipment expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Data processing expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pennsylvania shares tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intangible amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Collection and repossession expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other professional fees and services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FDIC insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss on sale or write-down of assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operational losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total noninterest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax provision (benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average Shares Outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average Shares Outstanding Assuming Dilution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Per Share Data: Basic Earnings Per Share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted Earnings Per Share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash Dividends Declared per Common Share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Years Ended December 31, 2012 2011 2010 (dollars in thousands, except share data) $ 187,258 $ 197,456 $ 225,062 31,695 12 104 6 33,763 213 49 64 37,915 5,216 73 94 219,075 231,545 268,360 21,454 1,070 5,684 1,938 7,622 30,146 188,929 20,544 168,385 2,193 (2,193) 0 192 6,206 14,743 6,272 5,850 4,607 13,199 755 13,610 65,434 86,069 13,255 12,460 7,054 5,706 1,467 5,756 4,329 5,032 7,394 4,367 24,318 177,207 56,612 14,658 33,496 728 5,568 1,886 7,454 41,678 189,867 55,816 134,051 (425) 425 0 2,185 6,498 14,775 6,376 5,596 4,155 11,968 (6,687) 12,803 57,669 84,669 14,069 12,517 6,027 5,480 1,534 7,583 5,297 5,490 9,428 779 23,953 176,826 14,894 (380) 41,954 $ 15,274 $ 49,845 1,948 5,593 4,213 9,806 61,599 206,761 61,552 145,209 (2,560) (6,633) (9,193) 2,422 5,897 16,968 6,369 5,331 824 10,459 141 10,016 49,234 84,988 14,271 12,568 5,671 5,455 2,031 4,430 4,131 7,948 2,715 581 26,437 171,226 23,217 239 22,978 103,885,396 103,885,663 104,700,227 104,700,393 93,197,225 93,199,773 0.40 0.40 0.18 $ $ $ 0.15 0.15 0.12 $ $ $ 0.25 0.25 0.06 $ $ $ $ The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements 54 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME Years Ended December 31, 2012 2011 2010 Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive (loss) income, before tax (benefit) expense: Unrealized holding (losses) gains on securities arising during the period . . . . Non-credit related gains (losses) on securities not expected to be sold . . . . . . Less: reclasification adjustment for (gains) losses on securities included in (dollars in thousands) $15,274 $22,978 $41,954 (2,854) 2,193 9,727 (425) (8,377) 6,633 net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (192) (2,185) 6,822 Unrealized gains for postretirement obligations: Transition obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net (loss) gain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 (300) 2 (260) 2 440 Total other comprehensive (loss) income, before tax (benefit) expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,151) 6,859 5,520 Income tax (benefit) expense related to items of other comprehensive (loss) income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (409) 2,400 1,933 Comprehensive Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $41,212 $19,733 $26,565 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements 55 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY Shares Outstanding Common Stock Additional Paid-in- Capital Retained Earnings Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), net Treasury Stock Unearned ESOP Shares Total Shareholders’ Equity (dollars in thousands, except per share data) Balance at December 31, 2011 . . . 104,916,994 $105,563 $365,868 $294,056 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41,954 Total other comprehensive loss . . . . Cash dividends declared ($0.18 per $2,001 $ (7,345) $(1,600) (742) $758,543 41,954 (742) (18,759) (18,759) share) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net decrease in unearned ESOP shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ESOP market value adjustment ($729, net of $255 tax benefit) Discount on dividend reinvestment . . plan purchases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tax benefit of stock options exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Treasury stock acquired . . . . . . . . . . Treasury stock reissued . . . . . . . . . . Restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (474) (92) 1 51 (5,662,700) 155,200 220,000 0 1,600 1,600 (474) (92) 1 (37,464) 1,028 412 (379) (1,264) (37,464) 1,407 1,625 Balance at December 31, 2012 . . . 99,629,494 $105,563 $365,354 $315,608 $1,259 $(41,777) $ 0 $746,007 Shares Outstanding Common Stock Additional Paid-in- Capital Retained Earnings Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), net Treasury Stock Unearned ESOP Shares Total Shareholders’ Equity (dollars in thousands, except per share data) Balance at December 31, 2010 . . . 104,846,194 $105,515 $366,488 $291,492 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,274 Total other comprehensive $(2,458) $(7,660) $(3,600) 4,459 (12,558) $749,777 15,274 4,459 (12,558) income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash dividends declared ($0.12 per share) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net decrease in unearned ESOP shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ESOP market value adjustment ($1,053, net of $368 tax benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Discount on dividend reinvestment plan purchases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tax benefit of stock options exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Treasury stock acquired . . . . . . . . . . Treasury stock reissued . . . . . . . . . . Restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Common stock issued . . . . . . . . . . . (685) (63) 6 0 1 121 (83) (69) 0 (1,336) 13,760 35,000 23,376 25 23 2,000 2,000 (685) (63) 6 (9) 72 126 144 (9) 155 169 Balance at December 31, 2011 . . . 104,916,994 $105,563 $365,868 $294,056 $ 2,001 $(7,345) $(1,600) $758,543 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements. 56 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Continued) Shares Outstanding Common Stock Additional Paid-in- Capital Retained Earnings Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), net Treasury Stock Unearned ESOP Shares Total Shareholders’ Equity (dollars in thousands, except per share data) Balance at December 31, 2009 . . . 85,151,875 $ 86,600 $301,523 $278,887 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,978 Total other comprehensive $(6,045) $(16,554) $(5,600) 3,587 (5,306) $638,811 22,978 3,587 (5,306) income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash dividends declared ($0.06 per share) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net decrease in unearned ESOP shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ESOP market value adjustment ($1,008, net of $352 tax benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Discount on dividend reinvestment plan purchases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tax benefit of stock options exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Treasury stock acquired . . . . . . . . . . (1,291) Treasury stock reissued . . . . . . . . . . 750,842 30,120 Restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Common stock issued . . . . . . . . . . . 18,914,648 (656) (33) 0 0 0 18,915 656 0 64,998 (4,899) (168) 0 2,000 2,000 (656) (33) 0 (9) 4,248 244 83,913 (9) 8,491 412 Balance at December 31, 2010 . . . 104,846,194 $105,515 $366,488 $291,492 $(2,458) $ (7,660) $(3,600) $749,777 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements. 57 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS Years Ended December 31, 2012 2011 2010 (dollars in thousands) Operating Activities Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating $ 41,954 $ 15,274 $ 22,978 activities: Provision for credit losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred tax expense (benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net losses on securities and other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net amortization of premiums and discounts on securities . . . . . . Net amortization of premiums and discounts on long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income from increase in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Decrease in interest receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Decrease in interest payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Increase (decrease) in income taxes payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other—net Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Investing Activities 20,544 2,551 7,912 1,838 1,381 55,816 (1,192) 9,026 9,776 721 61,552 (4,671) 10,707 8,948 212 (113) (124) (807) (5,850) 2,689 (1,280) 6,484 614 78,724 (5,596) 1,276 (1,423) (5,362) 5,927 84,119 (5,331) 4,188 (966) 1,983 12,077 110,870 Transactions with securities held to maturity: Proceeds from maturities and redemptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 14,520 Transactions with securities available for sale: Proceeds from sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from maturities and redemptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Purchases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from the redemption of FHLB stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from bank owned life insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from the sale of loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from sales of other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net (increase) decrease in loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Purchases of premises and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities . . . . . . . . Financing Activities Net (decrease) increase in federal funds purchased . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net increase (decrease) in other short-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . Net increase (decrease) in deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Repayments of other long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from issuance of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Discount on dividend reinvestment plan purchases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from reissuance of treasury stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Purchase of treasury stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock option tax benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities . . . . . . . . Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . Cash and cash equivalents at January 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash and cash equivalents at December 31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 574,846 (605,435) 11,568 2,501 15,981 17,660 (178,321) (10,182) (171,382) (41,300) 84,750 53,256 (25,480) 100,000 0 (92) (18,759) 1,028 (36,242) 1 117,162 24,504 78,478 $ 102,982 76,914 480,250 (723,805) 9,063 238 5,766 23,756 56,181 (8,320) (79,957) 62,500 62,417 (113,090) (24,561) 29,600 144 (63) (12,558) 72 (9) 6 4,458 8,620 69,858 $ 78,478 143,503 430,115 (387,135) 2,572 0 0 8,778 335,165 (4,886) 542,632 (92,200) (678,871) 82,197 (117,142) 50,000 83,913 (33) (5,306) 4,248 (9) 0 (673,203) (19,701) 89,559 $ 69,858 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements. 58 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 1—Statement of Accounting Policies General The following summary of accounting and reporting policies is presented to aid the reader in obtaining a better understanding of the financial statements and related financial data of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation and its subsidiaries (“First Commonwealth”) contained in this report. The financial information is presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and general practice for financial institutions in the United States of America. In preparing financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. In addition, these estimates and assumptions affect revenues and expenses in the financial statements and as such, actual results could differ from those estimates. Through its subsidiaries, which include one commercial bank, an insurance agency and a financial advisor, First Commonwealth provides a full range of loan, deposit, trust, insurance and personal financial planning services primarily to individuals and small to middle market businesses in fifteen counties in central and western Pennsylvania. First Commonwealth determined it has one business segment. First Commonwealth is subject to regulations of certain state and federal agencies. These regulatory agencies periodically examine First Commonwealth for adherence to laws and regulations. Basis of Presentation The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of First Commonwealth previously defined above. All material intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain reclassifications have been made in the Consolidated Financial Statements for 2010 to conform to the classifications presented for 2012 and 2011. Equity investments of less than a majority but at least 20% ownership are accounted for by the equity method and classified as “Other assets.” Earnings on these investments are reflected in “Other income” on the Consolidated Statements of Income, as appropriate, in the period earned. First Commonwealth’s variable interest entities (“VIEs”) are evaluated under the guidance included in ASU 2009-17. These VIEs include qualified affordable housing projects that First Commonwealth has invested in as part of its community reinvestment initiatives. We periodically assess whether or not our variable interests in these VIEs, based on qualitative analysis, provide us with a controlling interest in the VIE. The analysis includes an assessment of the characteristics of the VIE. We do not have a controlling financial interest in the VIE, which would require consolidation of the VIE, as we do not have the following characteristics: (1) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance; and (2) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Securities Debt securities that First Commonwealth has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as securities held to maturity and are reported at amortized cost adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount on a level yield basis. Debt and equity securities that are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term are to be classified as trading securities and reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses included in earnings. Debt and equity securities not classified as either held-to-maturity 59 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 1—Statement of Accounting Policies (Continued) Securities (Continued) securities or trading securities are classified as securities available for sale and are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses that are not related to impairment excluded from earnings and reported as a component of other comprehensive income, which is included in shareholders’ equity, net of deferred taxes. First Commonwealth has securities classified as either held to maturity or available for sale and does not engage in trading activities. First Commonwealth utilizes the specific identification method to determine the net gain or loss on debt securities and the average cost method to determine the net gain or loss on the equity securities. First Commonwealth conducts a comprehensive review of the investment portfolio on a quarterly basis to determine whether other-than-temporary impairment has occurred. Issuer-specific securities whose market values have fallen below their book values are initially selected for more in-depth analysis based on the percentage decline in value and duration of the decline. Issuer-specific securities include obligations of U.S. Government agencies and sponsored enterprises, single issue trust preferred securities, corporate debentures and obligations of states and political subdivisions. Further analysis of these securities includes a review of research reports, analysts’ recommendations, credit rating changes, news stories, annual reports, impact of interest rate changes and any other relevant information pertaining to the affected security. Pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations are measured by evaluating all relevant credit and structural aspects, determining appropriate performance assumptions and performing a discounted cash flow analysis. This evaluation includes detailed credit, performance and structural evaluations for each piece of collateral. Other factors in the pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations valuation include terms of the structure, the cash flow waterfall (for both interest and principal), the over collateralization and interest coverage tests and events of default/liquidation. Based on this review, a determination is made on a case by case basis as to a potential impairment. Declines in the fair value of individual securities below their cost that are not expected to be recovered will result in write- downs of the individual securities to their fair value. The related write-downs are included in earnings as impairment losses. Loans Loans are carried at the principal amount outstanding. Unearned income on installment loans and leases is taken into income on a declining basis, which results in an approximate level rate of return over the life of the loan or the lease. Interest is accrued as earned. Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value determined on an individual basis. First Commonwealth considers a loan to be past due and still accruing interest when payment of interest or principal is contractually past due but the loan is both well secured and in the process of collection. For installment, mortgage, term and other loans with amortizing payments that are scheduled monthly, 90 days past due is reached when four monthly payments are due and unpaid. For demand, time and other multi-payment obligations with payments scheduled other than monthly, delinquency status is calculated using number of days instead of number of payments. Revolving credit loans, including personal credit lines and home equity lines, are considered to be 90 days past due when the borrower has not made the minimum payment for four monthly cycles. A loan is placed in nonaccrual status when, based on current information and events, it is probable that First Commonwealth will be unable to fully collect principal or interest due according to the contractual terms of the loan. A loan is also placed in nonaccrual status when, based on regulatory definitions, the loan is maintained on a “cash basis” due to the weakened financial condition of the borrower. When a determination is made to place a loan in nonaccrual status, all accrued and unpaid interest for the current year is reversed against interest income 60 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 1—Statement of Accounting Policies (Continued) Loans (Continued) and uncollected interest for previous years is charged against the allowance for credit losses. Nonaccrual loans are restored to accrual status when, based on a sustained period of repayment by the borrower in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan, First Commonwealth expects repayment of the remaining contractual principal and interest or when the loan otherwise becomes well-secured and in the process of collection. First Commonwealth considers a loan to be a troubled debt restructured loan when, for economic or legal reasons related to the debtor’s financial difficulties, a concession is granted to the debtor that would not otherwise be considered. A loan is considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that First Commonwealth will be unable to collect principal or interest that is due in accordance with contractual terms of the loan. Impaired loans include nonaccrual loans and troubled debt restructured loans. Loan impairment is measured based on the present value of expected cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or, as a practical expedient, at the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. For loans other than those that First Commonwealth expects repayment through liquidation of the collateral, when the remaining recorded investment in the impaired loan is less than or equal to the present value of the expected cash flows, income is applied as a reduction to loan principal rather than interest income. Loans deemed uncollectible are charged off through the allowance for credit losses. Factors considered in assessing ultimate collectibility include past due status, financial condition of the borrower, collateral values, and debt covenants including secondary sources of repayment by guarantors. Payments received on previously charged off loans are recorded as recoveries in the allowance for credit losses. Loan Fees Loan origination and commitment fees, net of associated direct costs, are deferred and the net amount is amortized as an adjustment to the related loan yield on the interest method, generally over the contractual life of the related loans or commitments. Other Real Estate Owned Real estate, other than bank premises, is recorded at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated selling costs at the time of acquisition. Fair value is determined based on an independent appraisal. Expenses related to holding the property and rental income earned on the property are generally reflected in earnings in the current period. Depreciation is not recorded on the other real estate owned properties. Allowance for Credit Losses First Commonwealth maintains an allowance for credit losses at a level deemed sufficient to absorb losses that are inherent in the loan portfolio. First Commonwealth’s management determines and reviews with the Board of Directors the adequacy of the allowance on a quarterly basis to ensure that the provision for credit losses has been charged against earnings in an amount necessary to maintain the allowance at a level that is appropriate based on management’s assessment of probable estimated losses. First Commonwealth’s methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance for credit losses consists of several key elements. These elements 61 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 1—Statement of Accounting Policies (Continued) Allowance for Credit Losses (Continued) include an assessment of individual problem loans, delinquency and loss experience trends, and other relevant factors, all of which may be susceptible to significant changes. While allocations are made to specific loans and pools of loans, the total allowance is available for all credit losses. The following describes the major loan classifications used in the allowance for credit losses calculation. Other Assets Especially Mentioned (“OAEM”) loans have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. The potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects or weaken the Bank’s credit position at some future date. The credit risk may be relatively minor, yet constitute an undesirable risk in light of the circumstances surrounding the specific credit. No loss of principal or interest is expected. Loans classified as OAEM constitute an undue and unwarranted credit risk, but not to the point of being classified as a substandard risk. Substandard loans are those with a well-defined weakness or a weakness that jeopardizes the repayment of the debt. A loan may be classified as substandard as a result of deterioration of the borrower’s financial condition and repayment capacity. Loans for which repayment plans have not been met or collateral equity margins do not protect First Commonwealth may also be classified as substandard. Doubtful loans have the characteristics of substandard loans with the added characteristic that collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of presently existing facts and conditions, is highly improbable. Although the probability of loss is extremely high for doubtful loans, the classification of loss is deferred until pending factors, which might improve the loan, have been determined. Loans rated as doubtful, in whole or in part, are placed in nonaccrual status. First Commonwealth consistently applies the following comprehensive methodology and procedure for determining the allowance for credit losses. Criticized loans on the watch list, which include OAEM, substandard, doubtful, and impaired, are analyzed to determine the level of probable loss in the credits under current circumstances. The probable loss that is established for these classified loans is based on careful analysis of the probability the loan will default based on the loan’s performance, the related collateral value, cash flow considerations and the financial capability of any guarantor. Watch list loans are managed and monitored by assigned account officers within the special assets area of First Commonwealth in conjunction with supervision by senior management. A reserve is established for watch list loans that are classified. All impaired credits in excess of $100 thousand are individually reviewed quarterly. A specific reserve is established for impaired loans that is equal to the total amount of probable unconfirmed losses for the impaired loans that are reviewed. Based on this reserve as a percentage of reviewed loan balances, a reserve is also established for the impaired loan balances that are not individually reviewed. The allowance uses historical charge-off trends to estimate probable unconfirmed losses based on charge-off history for the greater of the eight most recent quarters or the twenty most recent quarters. The loss emergence periods, which are the average time period from when a loan becomes delinquent until it is charged off, are calculated for each loan type and applied to the historical loss percentages. Adjusted historical loss experience percentages are applied to non-classified loans from the watch list, as well as all other loans not on the watch list, to obtain the portion of the allowance for credit losses which is based on historical trends. Before applying the adjusted historical loss experience percentages, loan balances are reduced by the portion of the loan balances which are subject to guarantee by a government agency. 62 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 1—Statement of Accounting Policies (Continued) Allowance for Credit Losses (Continued) Historical delinquency trends are also used when estimating probable losses in the loan portfolio. Each loan category’s most recent four quarter average delinquency percentage is compared to its twenty quarter average. The twenty quarter average delinquency level is used in determining probable losses in the portfolio, unless the four quarter average exceeds the twenty quarter average. In that case, the four quarter average delinquency rate is more appropriate as it indicates there is currently a higher level of risk in the portfolio compared to historical levels. A portion of the allowance is obtained by applying the appropriate average delinquency percentage to non-classified loans from the watch list, as well as all other loans not on the watch list. An additional allowance is made by management based on a qualitative analysis of certain factors related to portfolio risks and economic conditions. Factors considered by management include employment trends, macroeconomic trends, commercial real estate trends and the overall lending environment. Portfolio risks include unusual changes or recent trends in specific portfolios such as unexpected changes in the trends or levels of delinquency. No matter how detailed an analysis of potential credit losses is performed, these estimates are not precise. Management must make estimates using assumptions and information that is often subjective and changes rapidly. Allowance for Off-Balance Sheet Credit Exposures First Commonwealth maintains an allowance for off-balance sheet credit exposure at a level deemed sufficient to absorb losses that are inherent to off-balance sheet credit risk. Management determines the adequacy of the allowance on a quarterly basis charging the provision against earnings in an amount necessary to maintain the allowance at a level that is appropriate based on management’s assessment of probable estimated losses. The Company’s methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance for off-balance sheet credit exposure consists of analysis of historical usage trends as well as loss history and probability of default rates related to the off-balance sheet category. The calculation begins with historical usage trends related to lines of credit as well as letters of credit and then utilizes those figures to determine the probable usage of available lines. These values are then adjusted by a determined probability of default as well as a loss given default. This amount is adjusted quarterly and reported as part of other operating expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Bank Owned Life Insurance First Commonwealth purchased insurance on the lives of certain groups of employees. The policies accumulate asset values to meet future liabilities including the payment of employee benefits such as health care. Increases in the cash surrender value are recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Under some of these policies, the beneficiaries receive a portion of the death benefit. The net present value of the future death benefits scheduled to be paid to the beneficiaries was $3.8 million and $3.6 million as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and is reflected in “Other Liabilities” on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Premises and Equipment Premises and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation on First Commonwealth’s Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Depreciation is computed on the straight-line and accelerated methods over the estimated useful life of the asset. A straight-line depreciation method was used for substantially all furniture and equipment. The straight-line depreciation method was used for buildings and improvements. Charges for maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Leasehold improvements are expensed over the term of the lease or the estimated useful life of the improvement, whichever is shorter. 63 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 1—Statement of Accounting Policies (Continued) Premises and Equipment (Continued) When developing software, First Commonwealth expenses costs that are incurred during the preliminary project stage and capitalizes certain costs that are incurred during the application development stage. Once software is in operation, maintenance costs are expensed over the maintenance period while upgrades that result in additional functionality or enhancements are capitalized. Training and data conversion costs are expensed as incurred. Capitalized software development costs and purchased software are amortized on a straight-line basis over a period not to exceed seven years, except for one software license that is being amortized over ten years. Goodwill Intangible assets resulting from acquisitions under the purchase method of accounting consist of goodwill and other intangible assets (see “Other Intangible Assets” section below). Goodwill is not amortized and is subject to at least annual assessments for impairment by applying a fair value based test. First Commonwealth reviews goodwill annually and again at any quarter-end if a material event occurs during the quarter that may affect goodwill. This review evaluates potential impairment by determining if our fair value has fallen below carrying value. Other Intangible Assets Other intangible assets consist of core deposits obtained through acquisitions and are amortized over their estimated lives using the present value of the benefit of the core deposits and straight-line methods of amortization. Core deposit intangibles are evaluated for impairment on an annual basis and when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets First Commonwealth reviews long-lived assets, such as premises and equipment and intangibles for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. These changes in circumstances may include a significant decrease in the market value of an asset or the extent or manner in which an asset is used. If there is an indication that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable, future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset are estimated. If the sum of the expected cash flows is less than the carrying value of the asset, a loss is recognized for the difference between the carrying value and fair value of the asset. Long-lived assets classified as held for sale are measured at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Depreciation or amortization is discontinued on long-lived assets classified as held for sale. Income Taxes First Commonwealth records taxes in accordance with the asset and liability method of FASB ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes,” whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amount of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases given the provisions of the enacted tax laws. Deferred tax assets are reduced, if necessary, by the amount of such benefits that are more likely than not expected to be realized based upon available evidence. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 740, interest or penalties incurred for taxes will be recorded as a component of noninterest expense. 64 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 1—Statement of Accounting Policies (Continued) Comprehensive Income Disclosures “Other Comprehensive Income” (comprehensive income, excluding net income) includes the after tax effect of changes in unrealized holding gains and losses on available-for-sale securities and changes in the funded status of defined benefit postretirement plans. Comprehensive income is reported in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, net of tax. Cash and Cash Equivalents For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, amounts due from banks, federal funds sold and interest-bearing bank deposits. Generally, federal funds are sold for one-day periods. Employee Stock Ownership Plan Accounting treatment for First Commonwealth’s Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) described in Note 24 “Unearned ESOP Shares” follows FASB ASC Topic 718, “Compensation—Stock Compensation” for ESOP shares acquired after December 31, 1992 (“new shares”). First Commonwealth’s ESOP borrowed funds are guaranteed by First Commonwealth. The ESOP shares purchased subject to the debt guaranteed by First Commonwealth are recorded as a reduction of common shareholders’ equity by recording unearned ESOP shares. Shares are committed to be released to the ESOP Trust for allocation to plan participants through loan payments. As the shares are committed to be released, the unearned ESOP shares account is credited for the average cost of the shares collateralizing the ESOP borrowed funds. Compensation cost is recognized for these shares in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 718 and is based upon the fair market value of the shares that are committed to be released. Additional paid-in capital is charged or credited for the difference between the fair value of the shares committed to be released and the cost of those shares to the ESOP. Dividends on unallocated ESOP shares are used for debt service and are reported as a reduction of debt and accrued interest payable. Dividends on allocated ESOP shares are charged to retained earnings and allocated or paid to the plan participants. The average number of common shares outstanding used in calculating earnings per share excludes all unallocated ESOP shares. Derivatives and Hedging Activities First Commonwealth accounts for derivative instruments and hedging activities in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” All derivatives are evaluated at inception as to whether or not they are hedging or non-hedging activities, and appropriate documentation is maintained to support the final determination. First Commonwealth recognizes all derivatives as either assets or liabilities on the Statements of Financial Condition and measures those instruments at fair value. For derivatives designated as fair value hedges, changes in the fair value of the derivative and the hedged item related to the hedged risk are recognized in earnings. Any hedge ineffectiveness would be recognized in the income statement line item pertaining to the hedged item. When First Commonwealth purchases a portion of a commercial loan that has an existing interest rate swap, it enters a Risk Participation Agreement with the counterparty and assumes the credit risk of the loan customer related to the swap. Any fee paid to First Commonwealth as a result of the risk participation agreement is offset by credit risk of the counterparties and is recognized in the income statement. Credit risk on the risk participation agreements is determined after considering the risk rating, probability of default and loss of given default of the counterparties. 65 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 1—Statement of Accounting Policies (Continued) Derivatives and Hedging Activities (Continued) Management periodically reviews contracts from various functional areas of First Commonwealth to identify potential derivatives embedded within selected contracts. As of December 31, 2012, First Commonwealth has interest derivative positions that are not designated as hedging instruments. See Note 7 “Derivatives” for a description of these instruments. Earnings Per Common Share Basic earnings per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period less unallocated ESOP shares. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the entity. For all periods presented, the dilutive effect on average shares outstanding is the result of compensatory stock options outstanding. Fair Value Measurements In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” First Commonwealth groups financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are: • • • Level 1—Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in active exchange markets, such as the New York Stock Exchange. Valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities. Level 1 securities include equity holdings comprised of publicly traded bank stocks which were priced using quoted market prices. Level 2—Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in less active dealer or broker markets. Valuations are obtained for identical or comparable assets or liabilities from alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. Level 2 securities include U.S. Government securities issued by Agencies and Sponsored Enterprises, Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions, certain corporate securities, FHLB stock, interest rate derivatives that include interest rate swaps, risk participation agreements and foreign currency contracts, certain other real estate owned and certain impaired loans. Level 3—Valuations for assets and liabilities that are derived from other valuation methodologies, including option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques, and not based on market exchange, dealer or broker traded transactions. If the inputs used to provide the evaluation are unobservable and/or there is very little, if any, market activity for the security or similar securities, the securities would be considered Level 3 securities. Level 3 valuations incorporate certain assumptions and projections in determining the fair value assigned to such assets or liabilities. The assets included in Level 3 are select Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions, corporate securities, pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations, nonmarketable equity investments certain other real estate owned, certain impaired loans and loans held for sale. In general, fair values of financial instruments are based upon quoted market prices, where available. If such quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon pricing models that primarily use, as inputs, 66 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 1—Statement of Accounting Policies (Continued) Fair Value Measurements (Continued) observable market-based parameters. Valuation adjustments may be made to ensure that financial instruments are recorded at fair value. These adjustments may include amounts to reflect counterparty credit quality and our creditworthiness, among other things, as well as unobservable parameters. Any such valuation adjustments are applied consistently over time. See Note 21 “Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities” for additional information. Note 2—New Accounting Pronouncements In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820)—Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs.” This Update changes the wording used to describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. As a result, the highest and best use and valuation premise concept should be applied. This Update also amends particular principles or requirements for measuring fair value or disclosing relevant information. For example, the amendment allows for financial assets with applicable market and credit risk managed on a basis of net exposure to be excluded from the requirements of Topic 820. This Update is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on First Commonwealth’s financial condition or results of operations. In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220)—Presentation of Comprehensive Income,” under which an entity has the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income, in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. If a separate statement is preferred, this statement should immediately follow the statement of net income and include components of other comprehensive income and a total for these items along with total comprehensive income. This Update was effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220)—Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05.” This deferral was made in order to address reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. All other provisions of ASU 2011-05 were required to be adopted for fiscal and related interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The deferral of the aforementioned classifications is also effective for all fiscal and related interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on First Commonwealth’s financial condition or results of operations. In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.” This amendment addresses the previously deferred portions of ASU 2011-05 related to reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. This amendment requires an entity to provide information about amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) by component. In addition, an entity is required to report the effect of significant reclassifications out of AOCI on the respective line items in net income if the amount being reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in its entirety to net income. For other amounts that are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, an entity is required to cross-reference other disclosures required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. This update is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The guidance is prospective and management does not believe the adoption of this ASU will have a significant impact on First Commonwealth’s financial condition or results of operations. In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, “Goodwill and Other (Topic 350)—Testing Goodwill for Impairment.” This Update provides an entity with the option to assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances lead to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a 67 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 2—New Accounting Pronouncements (Continued) reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If it determined that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary. Conversely, if the opposite conclusion is reached, then the first step of the two-step approach must be performed. The Update provides examples of events and circumstances that an entity should consider in performing its qualitative assessment. This Update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on First Commonwealth’s financial condition or results of operations. Note 3—Supplemental Comprehensive Income Disclosures The following table identifies the related tax effects allocated to each component of other comprehensive income in the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31: 2012 2011 2010 Pretax Amount Tax (Expense) Benefit Net of Tax Amount Pretax Amount Tax (Expense) Benefit Net of Tax Amount Pretax Amount Tax (Expense) Benefit Net of Tax Amount (dollars in thousands) Unrealized gains (losses) on securities: Unrealized holding (losses) gains on securities arising during the period . . . . . $(2,854) $1,006 $(1,848) $ 9,727 $(3,404) $ 6,323 $(8,377) $ 2,931 $(5,446) Noncredit related gains (losses) on securities not expected to be sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less: reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses on securities included in net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unrealized gains (losses) for postretirement obligations: 2,193 (768) 1,425 (425) 149 (276) 6,633 (2,321) 4,312 (192) 67 (125) (2,185) 765 (1,420) 6,822 (2,388) 4,434 Transition obligation . . . . Net (loss) gain . . . . . . . . . 2 (300) (1) 105 1 (195) 2 (260) (1) 91 1 (169) 2 440 (1) (154) 1 286 Total other comprehensive (loss) income . . . . $(1,151) $ 409 $ (742) $ 6,859 $(2,400) $ 4,459 $ 5,520 $(1,933) $ 3,587 68 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 4—Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures The following table presents information related to cash paid during the year for interest and income taxes as well as detail on non-cash investing and financing activities for the years ended December 31. 2012 2011 2010 (dollars in thousands) Cash paid during the year for: Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $31,597 11,641 $43,303 5,900 $63,501 2,516 Non-cash investing and financing activities: ESOP loan reductions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loans transferred to other real estate owned and repossessed assets . . . . . . . . Fair value of loans transferred from held to maturity to available for sale . . . Gross (decrease) increase in market value adjustment to securities available 1,600 4,979 0 2,000 34,269 14,235 2,000 11,987 0 for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transfer of secruities from held to maturity to available for sale . . . . . . . . . . (874) 0 7,107 0 5,088 22,433 Note 5—Earnings per Share The following table summarizes the composition of the weighted-average common shares (denominator) used in the basic and diluted earnings per share computation for the years ending December 31: Weighted average common shares issued . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average treasury shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Averaged unearned ESOP shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average unearned nonvested shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105,563,455 (1,456,953) (38,393) (182,713) 105,550,310 (657,633) (165,010) (27,440) 94,388,523 (828,523) (319,726) (43,049) Weighted average common shares and common stock equivalents used to calculate basic earnings per share . . . . . . . 103,885,396 104,700,227 93,197,225 2012 2011 2010 Additional common stock equivalents (nonvested stock) used to calculate diluted earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Additional common stock equivalents (stock options) used to calculate diluted earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Weighted average common shares and common stock 171 96 119 47 0 2,548 equivalents used to calculate diluted earnings per share . . . . . . 103,885,663 104,700,393 93,199,773 The following table shows the number of shares and the price per share related to common stock equivalents that were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, because to do so would have been anti-dilutive. 2012 Price Range 2011 Price Range 2010 Price Range Shares From To Shares From To Shares From To Stock Options . . . . . . . . . . . . Restricted Stock . . . . . . . . . . 268,630 163,509 $6.90 5.26 $14.55 6.82 496,863 22,502 $6.36 5.70 $14.55 6.82 610,594 17,370 $6.36 5.70 $14.55 12.35 69 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 6—Cash and Due from Banks Regulations of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System impose uniform reserve requirements on all depository institutions with transaction accounts, such as checking accounts and NOW accounts. Reserves are maintained in the form of vault cash or balances held with the Federal Reserve Bank. First Commonwealth Bank maintained average balances of $3.6 million during 2012 and $26.0 million during 2011 with the Federal Reserve Bank. Note 7—Derivatives First Commonwealth is a party to interest rate derivatives that are not designated as hedging instruments. These derivatives relate to interest rate swaps that First Commonwealth enters into with customers to allow customers to convert variable rate loans to a fixed rate. First Commonwealth pays interest to the customer at a floating rate on the notional amount and receives interest from the customer at a fixed rate for the same notional amount. At the same time the interest rate swap is entered into with the customer, an offsetting interest rate swap is entered into with another financial institution. First Commonwealth pays the other financial institution interest at the same fixed rate on the same notional amount as the swap entered into with the customer, and receives interest from the financial institution for the same floating rate on the same notional amount. The changes in the fair value of the swaps offset each other, except for the credit risk of the counterparties, which is determined by taking into consideration the risk rating, probability of default and loss of given default for all counterparties. We have nine risk participation agreements with financial institution counterparties for interest rate swaps related to loans in which we are a participant. The risk participation agreements provide credit protection to the financial institution should the borrower fail to perform on its interest rate derivative contract with the financial institution. The fee received, less the estimate of the loss for the credit exposure, was recognized in earnings at the time of the transaction. The following table depicts the credit value adjustment recorded related to the notional amount of derivatives outstanding as well as the notional amount of risk participation agreements participated to other banks at December 31: Credit value adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Notional Amount: 2012 2011 (dollars in thousands) $ (2,207) $ (2,963) Interest rate derivatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Risk participation agreements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sold credit protection on risk participation agreements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223,448 71,390 0 187,368 128,098 (22,147) The table below presents the amount representing the change in the fair value of derivative assets and derivative liabilities attributable to credit risk included in “Other income” on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31: 2012 2011 2010 (dollars in thousands) Non-hedging interest rate derivatives: Increase (decrease) in other income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $755 $(6,687) $141 The 2012 increase in other income can be attributed to a $1.4 million reduction in credit risk on one interest rate swap as a result of improvement in the credit rating of the counterparty (loan customer). Of the total $6.7 million in credit risk expense recognized in 2011, $4.4 million relates to two interest rate swaps that were terminated during 2011. The fair value of our derivatives is included in a table in Note 21 “Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities,” in the line items “Other assets” and “Other liabilities.” 70 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 8—Securities Available for Sale Below is an analysis of the amortized cost and fair values of securities available for sale at December 31: 2012 2011 Amortized Cost Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses Estimated Fair Value Amortized Cost (dollars in thousands) Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses Estimated Fair Value Obligations of U.S. Government Agencies: Mortgage-Backed Securities— Residential . . . . . . . . $ Obligations of U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises: Mortgage-Backed Securities— Residential . . . . . . . . Mortgage-Backed Securities— Commercial . . . . . . . Other Government— Sponsored Enterprises . . . . . . . . Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions . . . Corporate Securities . . . . . . Pooled Trust Preferred Collateralized Debt Obligations . . . . . . . . . . . Total Debt 27,883 $ 3,781 $ 0 $ 31,664 $ 32,139 $ 4,061 $ (6) $ 36,194 839,102 25,691 (392) 864,401 771,196 29,835 0 801,031 148 1 0 149 193 1 (1) 193 241,970 82 6,703 766 4 288 (72) 242,664 267,807 0 0 86 6,991 444 11,811 973 15 162 (132) 268,648 0 (562) 459 11,411 51,866 3 (28,496) 23,373 54,762 3 (31,785) 22,980 Securities . . . . . Equities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,167,754 1,859 30,534 116 (28,960) 0 1,169,328 1,975 1,138,352 1,860 35,050 0 (32,486) 0 1,140,916 1,860 Total Securities Available for Sale . . . . . . . . . $1,169,613 $30,650 $(28,960) $1,171,303 $1,140,212 $35,050 $(32,486) $1,142,776 Mortgage backed securities include mortgage backed obligations of U.S. Government agencies and obligations of U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises. These obligations have contractual maturities ranging from less than one year to approximately 30 years with lower anticipated lives to maturity due to prepayments. All mortgage backed securities contain a certain amount of risk related to the uncertainty of prepayments of the underlying mortgages. Interest rate changes have a direct impact upon prepayment speeds, therefore First Commonwealth uses computer simulation models to test the average life and yield volatility of all mortgage backed securities under various interest rate scenarios to monitor the potential effects on earnings and interest rate risk positions. During 2012, $5.1 million in single issue trust preferred securities and $0.2 million in pooled trust preferred securities were called by their issuers, providing security gains of $0.2 million. In 2011, $5.2 million in single issue trust preferred securities and $1.2 million in corporate debentures owned by a non-bank subsidiary of First Commonwealth were sold in order to reinvest the proceeds in more liquid assets for that subsidiary. The amounts sold represent the subsidiaries entire portfolio of these investments and resulted in a net gain of $0.3 million. Additionally, $3.0 million in single issue trust preferred securities held by another subsidiary were called, resulting in a gain of $0.1 million. Also during 2011, the Company executed its strategy 71 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 8—Securities Available for Sale (Continued) to liquidate its obligations of states and political subdivisions in order to mitigate future credit risk and improve its tax position. Investments in obligations of states and political subdivisions totaled $0.5 million and $47.8 million as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. This decline is a result of $4.2 million in maturities and $42.5 million in sales which provided $0.3 million in recognized gains. At December 31, 2012 and 2011, investments in obligations of states and political subdivisions had an amortized cost of $82 thousand and $0.4 million, respectively, and were classified as available for sale. None of these securities were in an unrealized loss position. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or repay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Other fixed income securities within the portfolio also contain prepayment risk. The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities at December 31, 2012, by contractual maturity, are shown below: Due within 1 year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Due after 1 but within 5 years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Due after 5 but within 10 years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Due after 10 years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mortgage-Backed Securities (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortized Cost Estimated Fair Value (dollars in thousands) $ 0 242,052 0 58,569 300,621 867,133 $1,167,754 $ 0 242,750 0 30,364 273,114 896,214 $1,169,328 (a) Mortgage Backed Securities include an amortized cost of $28 million and a fair value of $32 million for Obligations of U.S. Government agencies issued by Ginnie Mae and Obligations of U.S. Government- sponsored enterprises issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac which had an amortized cost of $839 million and a fair value of $864 million. Proceeds from sale, gross gains (losses) realized on sales, maturities and other-than-temporary impairment charges related to securities available for sale were as follows for the years ended December 31: Proceeds from sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0 $76,914 $143,503 2012 2011 2010 (dollars in thousands) Gross gains (losses) realized: Sales Transactions: Gross gains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0 0 0 $ 2,368 (258) 2,110 $ 2,892 (790) 2,102 Maturities, calls and impairment: Gross gains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other-than-temporary impairment Net gains (losses) and impairment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192 0 0 192 $192 75 0 0 75 $ 2,185 270 0 (9,193) (8,923) $ (6,821) Securities available for sale with an approximate fair value of $631.0 million and $668.8 million were pledged as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, to secure public deposits and for other purposes required or permitted by law. 72 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 9—Securities Held to Maturity There were no held-to-maturity debt securities as of December 31, 2012 and 2011. During 2010, First Commonwealth reclassified its entire held-to-maturity portfolio to the available-for-sale portfolio. At the time of reclassification, the investments had an amortized cost of $22.4 million of which $22.3 million were obligations of states and political subdivisions and $0.1 million were mortgage backed securities. When the securities were transferred, two of the obligations of states and political subdivision securities were in an unrealized loss position totaling $45 thousand, the remaining bonds in that category were in an unrealized gain position of $0.8 million and all of the mortgage backed securities were in an unrealized gain position. In 2010, other-than-temporary impairment charges of $45 thousand were recognized on the two states and political subdivision securities that were in an unrealized loss position when transferred to available-for-sale. For the year ended December 31, 2010, gross gains of $50 thousand were recognized on held to maturity investments which were called by their issuer. The transfer of securities from the held-to-maturity portfolio resulted from the implementation of a strategy to liquidate a portion of the obligations of states and political subdivisions portfolio in order to mitigate future credit risk and improve our tax position. Note 10—Other Investments As a member of the FHLB, First Commonwealth is required to purchase and hold stock in the FHLB to satisfy membership and borrowing requirements. This stock is restricted in that it can only be sold to the FHLB or to another member institution, and all sales of FHLB stock must be at par. As a result of these restrictions, FHLB stock is unlike other investment securities insofar as there is no trading market for FHLB stock and the transfer price is determined by FHLB membership rules and not by market participants. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, our FHLB stock totaled $28.2 million and $39.8 million, respectively and is included in “Other investments” on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. During 2012 and 2011, the FHLB repurchased excess stock from its members by repurchasing the lessor of 5% of the members’ total capital stock outstanding or its total excess capital stock. As a result, during the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, $11.6 million and $9.1 million, respectively, of the stock owned by First Commonwealth was repurchased. The FHLB repurchased stock and paid dividends in each quarter of 2012, however, decisions regarding any future repurchase of excess capital stock and dividend payments will be made by the FHLB on a quarterly basis. Management reviewed the FHLB’s Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2012 filed with the SEC on November 7, 2012. FHLB stock is held as a long-term investment and its value is determined based on the ultimate recoverability of the par value. First Commonwealth evaluates impairment quarterly. The decision of whether impairment exists is a matter of judgment that reflects our view of the FHLB’s long-term performance, which includes factors such as the following: its operating performance; the severity and duration of declines in the fair value of its net assets related to its capital stock amount; its commitment to make payments required by law or regulation and the level of such payments in relation to its operating performance; the impact of legislative and regulatory changes on the FHLB, and accordingly, on the members of FHLB; and its liquidity and funding position. • • • • • 73 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 10—Other Investments (Continued) After evaluating all of these considerations, First Commonwealth concluded that the par value of its investment in FHLB stock will be recovered. Accordingly, no impairment charge was recorded on these securities for the year ended December 31, 2012. Our evaluation of the factors described above in future periods could result in the recognition of impairment charges on FHLB stock. Note 11—Impairment of Investment Securities As required by FASB ASC Topic 320, “Investments—Debt and Equity Securities,” credit related other-than- temporary impairment on debt securities is recognized in earnings while non-credit related other-than-temporary impairment on debt securities not expected to be sold is recognized in other comprehensive income (“OCI”). During the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, no other-than-temporary impairment charges were recognized. For the year ended December 31, 2012, $2.2 million in non-credit related gains on our trust preferred collateralized debt obligations that were determined to be impaired in previous periods was recorded in OCI. For the year ended December 31, 2011, $0.4 million in non-credit related losses for the same pool of securities was recorded in OCI. All of the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded were classified as available-for-sale securities. First Commonwealth utilizes the specific identification method to determine the net gain or loss on debt securities and the average cost method to determine the net gain or loss on equity securities. In the Consolidated Statements of Income, the “Changes in fair value on impaired securities” line represents the change in fair value of securities impaired in the current or previous periods. The change in fair value includes both non-credit and credit related gains or losses. Credit related losses occur when the entire amortized cost of the security will not be recovered. The “Noncredit related (gains) losses on securities not expected to be sold (recognized in other comprehensive income)” line represents the gains and losses on the securities resulting from factors other than credit. The noncredit related gain or loss is disclosed in the Consolidated Statements of Income and recognized through other comprehensive income. The “Net impairment losses” line represents the credit related losses recognized in total noninterest income for the related period. We review our investment portfolio on a quarterly basis for indications of impairment. This review includes analyzing the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been lower than the cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, including any specific events which may influence the operations of the issuer and whether we are more likely than not to sell the security. We evaluate whether we are more likely than not to sell debt securities based upon our investment strategy for the particular type of security and our cash flow needs, liquidity position, capital adequacy, tax position and interest rate risk position. In addition, the risk of future other-than-temporary impairment may be influenced by additional bank failures, weakness in the U.S. economy, changes in real estate values and additional interest deferrals in our pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations. Our pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations are beneficial interests in securitized financial assets within the scope of FASB ASC Topic 325, “Investments—Other,” and are therefore evaluated for other-than-temporary impairment using management’s best estimate of future cash flows. If these estimated cash flows determine it is probable that an adverse change in cash flows has occurred, then other-than-temporary impairment would be recognized in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 320. There is a risk that First Commonwealth will record other-than-temporary impairment charges in the future. See Note 21 “Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities” for additional information. 74 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 11—Impairment of Investment Securities (Continued) The following table presents the gross unrealized losses and estimated fair values at December 31, 2012 by investment category and time frame for which the securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position: Less Than 12 Months 12 Months or More Total Estimated Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Estimated Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Estimated Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses (dollars in thousands) . . . . . . . $ 0 $ 0 $ 13 $ 0(a) $ 13 $ 0 Obligations of U.S. Government Agencies: Mortgage-Backed Securities—Residential Obligations of U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises: Mortgage-Backed Securities—Residential . . . . . . . Mortgage-Backed Securities—Commercial . . . . . . . Other Government-Sponsored Enterprises . . . . . . . . Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions . . . . . Corporate Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pooled Trust Preferred Collateralized Debt Obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76,296 0 59,303 0 0 (392) 0 (72) 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0(a) 0 0 0 0 76,317 0 59,303 0 0 (392) 0 (72) 0 0 0 0 23,316 (28,496) 23,316 (28,496) Total Securities Available for Sale . . . . . . . . . . . . $135,599 $(464) $23,350 $(28,496) $158,949 $(28,960) (a) Gross unrealized losses related to these types of securities are less than $1 thousand. At December 31, 2012, pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations accounted for 98% of unrealized losses, while fixed income securities issued by U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises comprised 2% of total unrealized losses. The following table presents the gross unrealized losses and estimated fair value at December 31, 2011 for available-for-sale and securities by investment category and time frame for which the securities had been in a continuous unrealized loss position: Less Than 12 Months 12 Months or More Total Estimated Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Estimated Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Estimated Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses (dollars in thousands) Obligations of U.S. Government Agencies: Mortgage-Backed Securities—Residential . . . . . . . . $ 1,086 $ (6) $ 16 $ 0(a) $ 1,102 $ (6) Obligations of U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises: Mortgage-Backed Securities—Residential . . . . . . . . Mortgage-Backed Securities—Commercial . . . . . . . Other Government-Sponsored Enterprises . . . . . . . . Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions . . . . . . Corporate Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pooled Trust Preferred Collateralized Debt Obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 151 55,969 0 4,536 0(a) (1) (132) 0 (562) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 151 55,969 0 4,536 0 (1) (132) 0 (562) 0 0 22,927 (31,785) 22,927 (31,785) Total Securities Available for Sale . . . . . . . . . . . . $61,767 $(701) $22,943 $(31,785) $84,710 $(32,486) As of December 31, 2012, our corporate securities had an amortized cost and estimated fair value of $6.7 million and $7.0 million, respectively, and were comprised of single issue trust preferred securities issued primarily by money center and large regional banks. As of December 31, 2011, the same portion of the portfolio had an 75 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 11—Impairment of Investment Securities (Continued) amortized cost of $11.8 million and an estimated fair value of $11.4 million. There were no corporate securities in an unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2012, while as of December 31, 2011, there were $0.6 million in unrealized losses related to these securities. When unrealized losses exist, management reviews each of the issuer’s asset quality, earnings trend and capital position, to determine whether issues in an unrealized loss position were other-than-temporarily impaired. All interest payments on the corporate securities are being made as contractually required. As of December 31, 2012, the book value of our pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations totaled $51.9 million with an estimated fair value of $23.4 million, which includes securities comprised of 335 banks and other financial institutions. Two of our pooled securities are senior tranches and the remainder are mezzanine tranches, four of which have no senior class remaining in the issue. Two of the pooled issues, representing $2.2 million of the $51.9 million book value, remain above investment grade. At the time of initial issue, the subordinated tranches ranged in size from approximately 7% to 35% of the total principal amount of the respective securities and no more than 5% of any pooled security consisted of a security issued by any one institution. As of December 31, 2012, after taking into account management’s best estimates of future interest deferrals and defaults, seven of our securities had no excess subordination in the tranches we own and six of our securities had excess subordination which ranged from 6% to 573% of the current performing collateral. The following table provides additional information related to our pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations as of December 31, 2012: Deal Class Book Value Fair Value Unrealized Gain (Loss) Moody’s/ Fitch Ratings Number of Banks Senior Pre TSL I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pre TSL IV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mezzanine Pre TSL V . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mezzanine Pre TSL VII . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mezzanine Pre TSL VIII . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mezzanine Pre TSL IX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mezzanine Pre TSL X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mezzanine Pre TSL XII . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mezzanine Pre TSL XIII . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mezzanine Pre TSL XIV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mezzanine MMCap I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MMCap I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mezzanine MM Comm IX . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mezzanine Senior $ 1,009 1,830 54 3,654 1,833 2,268 1,388 5,508 12,571 13,188 1,220 867 6,476 $ (dollars in thousands) (4) $ 1,005 (719) 1,111 3 57 (328) 3,326 (826) 1,007 (1,325) 943 (223) 1,165 (2,977) 2,531 (8,115) 4,456 (8,405) 4,783 (27) 1,193 (401) 466 (5,146) 1,330 Aa3/A Caa2/CCC C/- Ca/C C/C Ca/C Ca/C Ca/C Ca/C Ca/C A3/A Ca/C Ca/CC 17 6 3 16 32 46 50 71 63 61 17 17 29 Deferrals and Defaults as a % of Current Collateral Excess Subordination as a % of Current Performing Collateral 33.33% 27.07 100.00 48.92 52.99 25.50 35.24 35.35 36.87 38.97 50.26 50.26 42.41 159.27% 91.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.32 0.00 0.00 6.48 29.37 573.29 0.00 0.00 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $51,866 $23,373 $(28,493) Lack of liquidity in the market for trust preferred collateralized debt obligations, credit rating downgrades and market uncertainties related to the financial industry are factors contributing to the impairment on these securities. On a quarterly basis we evaluate our debt securities for other-than-temporary impairment. For the year ended December 31, 2012, there were no credit related other-than-temporary impairment charges recognized on our pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations. When evaluating these investments we determine a credit related portion and a non-credit related portion of other-than-temporary impairment. The credit related portion is 76 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 11—Impairment of Investment Securities (Continued) recognized in earnings and represents the difference between book value and the present value of future cash flows. The non-credit related portion is recognized in OCI and represents the difference between the fair value of the security and the amount of credit related impairment. A discounted cash flow analysis provides the best estimate of credit related other-than-temporary impairment for these securities. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, none of the pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations were considered to be nonperforming securities, compared to $15.8 million which were considered nonperforming at December 31, 2010. These securities were returned to performing status in 2011 because of evidence supporting management’s estimate of future cash flows indicating that all remaining principal and interest will be received. Support for these estimates include: no other-than-temporary impairment charges have been recorded since the third quarter of 2010, improvement in the underlying collateral of these bonds evidenced by a reduced level of new interest payment deferrals and principal defaults as well as an increase in actual cures of deferring collateral. Additional information related to the discounted cash flow analysis follows: Our pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations are measured for other-than-temporary impairment within the scope of FASB ASC Topic 325 by determining whether it is probable that an adverse change in estimated cash flows has occurred. Determining whether there has been an adverse change in estimated cash flows from the cash flows previously projected involves comparing the present value of remaining cash flows previously projected against the present value of the cash flows estimated at December 31, 2012. We consider the discounted cash flow analysis to be our primary evidence when determining whether credit related other-than-temporary impairment exists. Results of a discounted cash flow test are significantly affected by other variables such as the estimate of future cash flows, credit worthiness of the underlying banks and determination of probability of default of the underlying collateral. The following provides additional information for each of these variables: • • • Estimate of Future Cash Flows—Cash flows are constructed in an INTEX cash flow model which includes each deal’s structural features. Projected cash flows include prepayment assumptions which are dependent on the issuers asset size and coupon rate. For collateral issued by financial institutions over $15 billion in asset size with a coupon over 7%, a 100% prepayment rate is assumed. Financial institutions over $15 billion with a coupon of 7% or under are assigned a prepayment rate of 40% for two years and 2% thereafter. Financial institutions with assets between $2 billion and $15 billion with coupons over 7% are assigned a 5% prepayment rate. For financial institutions below $2 billion, if the coupon is over 10%, a prepayment rate of 5% is assumed and for all other issuers, there is no prepayment assumption incorporated into the cash flows. The modeled cash flows are then used to estimate if all the scheduled principal and interest payments of our investments will be returned. Credit Analysis—A quarterly credit evaluation is performed for each of the 335 banks comprising the collateral across the various pooled trust preferred securities. Our credit evaluation considers all evidence available to us and includes the nature of the issuer’s business, its years of operating history, corporate structure, loan composition, loan concentrations, deposit mix, asset growth rates, geographic footprint and local economic environment. Our analysis focuses on profitability, return on assets, shareholders’ equity, net interest margin, credit quality ratios, operating efficiency, capital adequacy and liquidity. Probability of Default—A probability of default is determined for each bank and is used to calculate the expected impact of future deferrals and defaults on our expected cash flows. Each bank in the collateral pool is assigned a probability of default for each year until maturity. Currently, any bank that is in default is assigned a 100% probability of default and a 0% projected recovery rate. All other banks 77 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 11—Impairment of Investment Securities (Continued) in the pool are assigned a probability of default based on their unique credit characteristics and market indicators with a 10% projected recovery rate. For the majority of banks currently in deferral we assume the bank continues to defer and will eventually default and therefore a 100% probability of default is assigned. However, for some deferring collateral there is the possibility that they become current on interest or principal payments at some point in the future and in those cases a probability that the deferral will ultimately cure is assigned. The probability of default is updated quarterly. As of December 31, 2012, default probabilities for performing collateral ranged from 0.33% to 75%. Our credit evaluation provides a basis for determining deferral and default probabilities for each underlying piece of collateral. Using the results of the credit evaluation, the next step of the process is to look at pricing of senior debt or credit default swaps for the issuer (or where such information is unavailable, for companies having similar credit profiles as the issuer). The pricing of these market indicators provides the information necessary to determine appropriate default probabilities for each bank. In addition to the above factors, our evaluation of impairment also includes a stress test analysis which provides an estimate of excess subordination for each tranche. We stress the cash flows of each pool by increasing current default assumptions to the level of defaults which results in an adverse change in estimated cash flows. This stressed breakpoint is then used to calculate excess subordination levels for each pooled trust preferred security. The results of the stress test allows management to identify those pools that are at a greater risk for a future break in cash flows so that we can monitor banks in those pools more closely for potential deterioration of credit quality. Our cash flow analysis as of December 31, 2012, indicates that no credit related other-than-temporary impairment has occurred on our pooled trust preferred securities during the year ended December 31, 2012. Based upon the analysis performed by management, it is probable that seven of our pooled trust preferred securities are expected to experience contractual principal and interest shortfalls and therefore appropriate other- than-temporary impairment charges were recorded in prior periods. These securities are identified in the table on page 76 with 0% “Excess Subordination as a % of Current Performing Collateral.” For the remaining securities in the table, our analysis as of December 31, 2012 indicates it is probable that we will collect all contractual principal and interest payments. For two of those securities, PreTSL IX and PreTSL XIV, other-than-temporary impairment charges were recorded in prior periods, however, due to improvement in the expected cash flows of these securities, it is now probable that all contractual payments will be received. During 2008, 2009 and 2010, other-than-temporary impairment charges were recognized on all of our pooled trust preferred securities, except for PreTSL I, PreTSL IV and MMCap I-Senior. Our cash flow analysis as of December 31, 2012, for all of these impaired securities indicates that it is now probable we will collect principal and interest in excess of what was estimated at the time other-than-temporary impairment charges were recorded. This change can be attributed to improvement in the underlying collateral for these securities and has resulted in our current book value being below the present value of estimated future principal and interest payments. The excess for each bond of the present value of future cash flows over our current book value ranges from 13% to 148% and will be recognized as an adjustment to yield over the remaining life of these securities. During the year ended December 31, 2012, $1.5 million of the excess was recognized as an adjustment to yield on these securities. 78 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 11—Impairment of Investment Securities (Continued) The table below provides a cumulative roll forward of credit losses recognized in earnings for debt securities held and not intended to be sold for the years ended December 31: 2012 2011 2010 Balance, beginning (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Credit losses on debt securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was not previously recognized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Additional credit losses on debt securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was previously recognized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Increases in cash flows expected to be collected, recognized over the remaining (dollars in thousands) $44,850 $36,161 $44,736 0 0 0 0 0 8,689 life of the security (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,462) (114) 0 Balance, ending . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $43,274 $44,736 $44,850 (a) The beginning balance represents credit related losses included in other-than-temporary impairment charges recognized on debt securities in prior periods. (b) Represents the increase in cash flows recognized in interest income during the period. On a quarterly basis, management evaluates equity securities for other-than-temporary impairment. For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, there was no impairment recognized on equity securities. In 2010, $0.4 million in other than-temporary impairment charges were recognized on equity securities related to three Pennsylvania based financial institutions. When evaluating equity investments for other-than-temporary impairment we review the severity and duration of decline in estimated fair value, research reports, analysts’ recommendations, credit rating changes, news stories, annual reports, regulatory filings, impact of interest rate changes and other relevant information. There were no equity securities in an unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2012 and 2011. Note 12—Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses The following table provides outstanding balances related to each of our loan types as of December 31: Commercial, financial, agricultural and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Real estate construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Residential real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Commercial real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loans to individuals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,019,822 87,438 1,241,565 1,273,661 582,218 $ 996,739 76,564 1,137,059 1,267,432 565,849 Total loans net of unearned income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $4,204,704 $4,043,643 2012 2011 (dollars in thousands) 79 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 12—Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses (Continued) Credit Quality Information As part of the on-going monitoring of credit quality within the loan portfolio, the following credit worthiness categories are used in grading our loans: Pass Acceptable levels of risk exist in the relationship. Includes all loans not adversely classified as OAEM, substandard or doubtful. Other Assets Especially Mentioned (OAEM) Potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. The potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects or weaken the Bank’s credit position at some future date. The credit risk may be relatively minor, yet constitute an undesirable risk in light of the circumstances surrounding the specific credit. No loss of principal or interest is expected. Substandard Well-defined weakness or a weakness that jeopardizes the repayment of the debt. A loan may be classified as substandard as a result of deterioration of the borrower’s financial condition and repayment capacity. Loans for which repayment plans have not been met or collateral equity margins do not protect the Company may also be classified as substandard. Doubtful Loans with the characteristics of substandard loans with the added characteristic that collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of presently existing facts and conditions, is highly improbable. The use of creditworthiness categories to grade loans permits management’s use of migration analysis to estimate a portion of credit risk. The Company’s internal creditworthiness grading system provides a measurement of credit risk based primarily on an evaluation of the borrower’s cash flow and collateral. Movements between these rating categories provide a predictive measure of credit losses and therefore assists in determining the appropriate level for the loan loss reserves. Category ratings are reviewed each quarter, at which time management analyzes the results, as well as other external statistics and factors related to loan performance. Loans that migrate towards higher risk rating levels generally have an increased risk of default, whereas, loans that migrate toward lower risk ratings generally will result in a lower risk factor being applied to those related loan balances. The following tables represent our credit risk profile by creditworthiness category for the years ended December 31: 2012 Commercial, financial, agricultural and other Real estate construction Residential real estate Commerical real estate Loans to individuals Total (dollars in thousands) $ 925,868 $64,353 $1,224,849 $1,119,093 $582,039 $3,916,202 31,049 62,905 0 93,954 925 18,638 3,522 23,085 5,647 11,069 0 16,716 82,581 71,987 0 154,568 3 176 0 179 120,205 164,775 3,522 288,502 Pass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-Pass OAEM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Substandard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Doubtful Total Non-Pass . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,019,822 $87,438 $1,241,565 $1,273,661 $582,218 $4,204,704 80 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 12—Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses (Continued) Credit Quality Information (Continued) Commercial, financial, agricultural and other Real estate construction Residential real estate Commercial real estate Loans to individuals Total 2011 Pass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-Pass OAEM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Substandard . . . . . . . . . . . . . Doubtful . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total Non-Pass . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $904,057 $44,914 $1,126,143 $1,110,664 $565,842 $3,751,620 (dollars in thousands) 27,627 60,114 4,941 92,682 $996,739 4,238 21,701 5,711 31,650 $76,564 5,484 5,432 0 10,916 $1,137,059 61,855 94,913 0 156,768 $1,267,432 7 0 0 7 $565,849 99,211 182,160 10,652 292,023 $4,043,643 Portfolio Risks Credit quality of our loan portfolio represents significant risk to our earnings, capital, regulatory agency relationships, investment community and shareholder returns. First Commonwealth devotes a substantial amount of resources managing this risk primarily through our credit administration department that develops and administers policies and procedures for underwriting, maintaining, monitoring and collecting activities. Credit administration is independent of lending departments and oversight is provided by the credit committee of the First Commonwealth Board of Directors. Total gross charge-offs for the year ended December 31, 2012 were $17.0 million. Total gross charge-offs for the year ended December 31, 2011 were $68.3 million, including charge-offs of $9.5 million recognized on loans transferred to held for sale. Criticized loans have been evaluated with respect to the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses which we believe is adequate at this time. However, changes in economic conditions, interest rates, borrower financial condition, delinquency trends or previously established fair values of collateral factors could significantly change those judgmental estimates. The credit administration department continually monitors and evaluates those evolving factors in order to adjust the allowance for credit losses. Our local markets of western Pennsylvania, which comprise 91% of our loan portfolio, have not been as intensely affected by the most recent economic recession as some other regions of the country and are evidencing a quicker economic recovery. We believe adhering to tighter geographic markets and credit standards will improve ongoing credit quality in the portfolios. Risk factors associated with commercial real estate and construction related loans are monitored closely since this is an area that represents the most significant portion of the loan portfolio and has experienced the most stress during the economic downturn and has evidenced little recovery strength. 81 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 12—Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses (Continued) Age Analysis of Past Due Loans by Segment The following tables delineate the aging analysis of the recorded investments in past due loans as of December 31. Also included in these tables are loans that are 90 days or more past due and still accruing because they are well-secured and in the process of collection. 30 - 59 days past due 60 - 89 days past due 2012 90 days and greater and still accruing Nonaccrual Total past due and nonaccrual (dollars in thousands) Current Total Commercial, financial, agricultural and other . . . . . Real estate construction . . . . . Residential real estate . . . . . . . Commercial real estate . . . . . . Loans to individuals . . . . . . . . $ 991 2 6,597 3,339 3,140 $ 620 19 2,357 1,389 934 $ 288 15 730 195 1,219 $29,258 9,778 9,283 46,023 176 $ 31,157 9,814 18,967 50,946 5,469 $ 988,665 77,624 1,222,598 1,222,715 576,749 $1,019,822 87,438 1,241,565 1,273,661 582,218 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $14,069 $5,319 $2,447 $94,518 $116,353 $4,088,351 $4,204,704 30 - 59 days past due 60 - 89 days past due 2011 90 days and greater and still accruing Nonaccrual Total past due and nonaccrual (dollars in thousands) Current Total Commercial, financial, agricultural and other . . . . Real estate construction . . . . Residential real estate . . . . . . Commercial real estate . . . . . Loans to individuals . . . . . . . $ 5,433 0 7,144 3,671 2,952 $ 824 180 2,100 1,241 962 $ 287 0 8,767 157 1,804 $33,459 14,911 3,153 26,953 0 $ 40,003 15,091 21,164 32,022 5,718 $ 956,736 61,473 1,115,895 1,235,410 560,131 $ 996,739 76,564 1,137,059 1,267,432 565,849 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $19,200 $5,307 $11,015 $78,476 $113,998 $3,929,645 $ 4,043,643 Nonaccrual Loans The previous table summarizes nonaccrual loans by loan segment. The company generally places loans on nonaccrual status when the full and timely collection of interest or principal becomes uncertain, when part of the principal balance has been charged off and no restructuring has occurred or the loans reach a certain number of days past due. Generally loans 90 days or more past due are placed on nonaccrual status, except for consumer loans which are placed in nonaccrual status at 150 days past due. In periods prior to the third quarter of 2012, if a consumer loan was well secured and in the process of collection, it remained on accrual status, as delinquency was not a factor in moving it to nonaccrual status. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual, the accrued unpaid interest receivable is reversed against interest income and all future payments received are applied as a reduction to the loan principal. Generally, the loan is returned to accrual status when (a) all delinquent interest and principal become current under the terms of the loan agreement or (b) the loan is both well-secured and in the process of collection and collectability is no longer doubtful. 82 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 12—Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses (Continued) Impaired Loans Management considers loans to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is determined that the company will probably not be able to collect all amounts due according to the loan contract, including scheduled interest payments. Determination of impairment is treated the same across all loan categories. When management identifies a loan as impaired, the impairment is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, except when the sole source or repayment for the loan is the operation or liquidation of collateral. When the loan is collateral dependent, the appraised value less estimated cost to sell is utilized. If management determines the value of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, impairment is recognized through an allowance estimate or a charge-off to the allowance. Troubled debt restructured loans on accrual status are considered to be impaired loans. When the ultimate collectability of the total principal of an impaired loan is in doubt and the loan is on nonaccrual status, all payments are applied to principal, under the cost recovery method. When the ultimate collectability of the total principal of an impaired loan is not in doubt and the loan is on nonaccrual status, contractual interest is credited to interest income when received, under the cash basis method. Included in the 2011 total of nonperforming loans was $13.4 million of loans held for sale. While these loans were considered to be nonperforming, they were not taken into consideration when determining the allowance for credit losses as they were carried at the lower of cost or fair value. Nonperforming loans at December 31, 2011 included an $11.3 million loan for a waste management company, which was classified as a troubled debt restructured loan. This loan was paid off in full in January 2012. Additionally, a $10.3 million loan to an information technology firm was returned to accrual status in the second quarter of 2012. The most significant loans placed in nonperforming status during 2012, include $6.5 million to a western Pennsylvania in-patient health care facility, $4.9 million commercial real estate loan for student housing in western Pennsylvania, $4.6 million for a hotel resort syndication loan located in the state of Washington, $3.8 million for a commercial real estate loan to a nonprofit institution in Alabama, $2.8 million to a western Pennsylvania construction firm, and $2.5 million to a manufacturer of medical equipment in Pennsylvania. In addition to the aforementioned loans which were placed on nonaccrual status, a $3.3 million commercial real estate loan in western Pennsylvania was modified with a maturity extension and therefore was classified as a TDR. Also, impacting the balance of nonperforming loans at December 31, 2012, was the inclusion of $6.7 million in consumer loans which were 150 days or more past due. Of the consumer loans on nonaccrual status as of December 31, 2012, $6.5 million of the $6.7 million, were residential real estate loans. Unfunded commitments related to nonperforming loans were $4.6 million and $6.7 million at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. After consideration of available collateral related to these commitments, an off balance sheet reserve of $0.2 million was established for these commitments at December 31, 2012 and 2011. Significant nonaccrual loans as of December 31, 2012 include the following; $19.1 million, the remaining portion of a $44.1 million unsecured loan to a western Pennsylvania real estate developer. This loan was originated in 2004 and was placed in nonaccrual status in the fourth quarter of 2009. A settlement plan with the borrower and three other lenders was reached in the fourth quarter of 2010 and resulted in an $8.0 million principal payment and a $15.4 million partial charge-off. $15.7 million commercial real estate loan for a real estate developer in eastern Pennsylvania. This loan was originated in 2007 and restructured in the fourth quarter of 2011 which resulted in a charge-off of $4.2 million. The most recent appraisal for the real estate collateral was completed in the third quarter of 2011, as the bank was expecting a fourth quarter external refinance of this loan. • • 83 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 12—Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses (Continued) Impaired Loans (Continued) • • • $6.5 million commercial real estate loan to an in-patient health care facility in western Pennsylvania. This loan was originated in 2008 and placed in nonaccrual status in September 2012. The most recent appraisal for the real estate collateral was completed in the fourth quarter of 2012. $4.9 million for a western Pennsylvania student housing complex. This loan was originated in 2008 and placed in nonaccrual status in December 2012. The most recent appraisal for the real estate collateral was completed in the fourth quarter of 2012. $4.6 million real estate secured loan to a hotel resort syndication in Washington. This loan was originated in 2007 and placed in nonaccrual status in December of 2012. The most recent appraisals for the real estate collateral were completed in the second quarter of 2012. The following tables include the recorded investment and unpaid principal balance for impaired loans with the associated allowance amount, if applicable, as of December 31, 2012 and 2011. Also presented are the average recorded investment in impaired loans and the related amount of interest recognized while the loan was considered impaired for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010. Average balances are calculated based on month-end balances of the loans for the period reported. 2012 Recorded Investment Unpaid Principal Balance Related Allowance Average Recorded Investment Interest Income Recognized (dollars in thousands) With no related allowance recorded: Commercial, financial, agricultural and other . . . Real estate construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Residential real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Commercial real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loans to individuals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Subtotal With an allowance recorded: Commercial, financial, agricultural and other . . . Real estate construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Residential real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Commercial real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loans to individuals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 8,080 8,491 7,928 33,259 256 58,014 26,532 2,756 2,695 17,558 0 49,541 $107,555 $ 8,983 35,555 8,401 35,401 256 88,596 27,412 3,087 2,696 17,896 0 51,091 $139,687 $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 10,331 300 780 6,367 0 17,778 $17,778 $ 9,217 11,912 8,114 28,574 103 57,920 21,979 1,457 1,599 5,024 0 30,059 $87,979 $173 0 72 66 2 313 9 0 15 32 0 56 $369 84 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 12—Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses (Continued) Impaired Loans (Continued) With no related allowance recorded: Commercial, financial, agricultural and other . . . Real estate construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Residential real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Commercial real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loans to individuals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Subtotal With an allowance recorded: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Commercial, financial, agricultural and other . . . Real estate construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Residential real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Commercial real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loans to individuals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2011 Recorded Investment Unpaid Principal Balance Related Allowance Average Recorded Investment Interest Income Recognized (dollars in thousands) $ 2,010 10,814 3,125 36,777 0 52,726 34,056 6,298 955 4,717 0 46,026 $ 3,418 20,161 3,513 41,974 0 69,066 34,341 21,402 955 4,863 0 61,561 $ $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 9,069 2,960 93 1,114 0 13,236 3,887 23,254 2,702 35,817 10 65,670 30,456 14,465 615 28,716 0 74,252 $ 20 10 9 799 0 838 152 0 7 396 0 555 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $98,752 $130,627 $13,236 $139,922 $1,393 2010 Average Recorded Investment Interest Income Recognized (dollars in thousands) With no related allowance recorded: Commercial, financial, agricultural and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Real estate construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Residential real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Commercial real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loans to individuals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . With an allowance recorded: Commercial, financial, agricultural and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Real estate construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Residential real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Commercial real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loans to individuals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,051 35,898 3,165 24,198 58 69,370 43,778 16,641 237 10,711 0 71,367 $ 0 0 0 12 0 12 14 0 0 4 0 18 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $140,737 $30 Troubled debt restructured loans are those loans whose terms have been renegotiated to provide a reduction or deferral of principal or interest as a result of the financial difficulties experienced by the borrower, who could not obtain comparable terms from alternate financing sources. 85 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 12—Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses (Continued) Impaired Loans (Continued) As a result of adopting the amendments in ASU 2011-02, all restructurings that occurred on or after January 1, 2011 were assessed for identification as troubled debt restructurings considering the new guidance. No additional troubled debt restructurings were identified for loans for which the allowance for credit losses would have previously been measured under a general allowance for credit losses methodology. The following table provides detail as to the total troubled debt restructured loans and total commitments outstanding on troubled debt restructured loans as of December 31: 2012 2011 2010 (dollars in thousands) Troubled debt restructured loans Accrual status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nonaccrual status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $13,037 50,979 $20,276 44,841 $ 1,336 31,410 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $64,016 $65,117 $32,746 Commitments Letters of credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unused lines of credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,574 0 $12,580 42 $11,321 1,095 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,574 $12,622 $12,416 During, 2012, a $2.8 million nonaccrual loan to a water treatment plant and a $3.7 million accruing loan to a gas well servicing operation were each restructured with a twelve month principal forbearance. The nonaccrual loan is fully reserved for while the accruing loan is secured by company assets with no reserve allocation. These loans are part of a $17.0 million commercial loan relationship with a shallow gas well operator whose business has been impacted by the sharp decline in natural gas prices due to the success of Marcellus deep well drilling. In addition to these two loans, other loans in this relationship include loans to a related exploration and production company and loans to the principal which are secured by real estate and investment securities. Also, in 2012 a $3.3 million commercial real estate loan was restructured with a six month maturity extension. This loan has remained on accruing status and the collateral shortfall is fully reserved. During 2012, all decreases in balances between the pre-modification and post-modification balance are due to customer payments. During 2011, a $2.7 million charge-off was recorded in relation to the transfer to held for sale of one of the loans included in commercial real estate in the table below. The sale of this loan was completed in 2012. Three commercial real estate loans, totaling $10.2 million, were classified as troubled debt restructured loans during 2011 and subsequently paid off prior to December 31, 2011. In addition, $5.6 million was charged-off in the restructuring of one relationship modified during the fourth quarter of 2011. As December 31, 2012, the remaining balance of the loans included in this relationship is $17.4 million. The remainder of changes in loan balances for 2011 between the pre-modification balance and the post-modification balance is due to customer payments. During 2010, a $15.4 million charge-off was recorded on a loan to a Pennsylvania real estate developer. The remaining changes between pre-modification balances and post-modification balances during 2010 are due to customer payments. 86 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 12—Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses (Continued) Impaired Loans (Continued) The outstanding commitments as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 were primarily committed to one loan relationship that paid off in full in January 2012. The following tables provide detail, including specific reserve and reasons for modification, related to loans identified as troubled debt restructurings during the years ending December 31: Reason for Modification 2012 Number of Contracts Extend Maturity Modify Rate Modify Payments Other Total Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Post- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment (dollars in thousands) Commercial, financial, agricultural and other . . . Real estate construction . . . . Residential real estate . . . . . Commercial real estate . . . . Loans to individuals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total 12 2 25 4 17 60 $1,599 $ 187 $ 9,476 0 1,697 697 200 71 3,280 88 0 $6,776 $4,724 $10,332 0 132 4,308 97 $11,262 1,697 1,077 7,659 191 $21,886 $11,335 2,133 973 7,607 173 $22,221 $ 0 0 48 0 6 $54 2011 Reason for Modification Number of Contracts Extend Maturity Modify Rate Modify Payments Total Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Post- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment (dollars in thousands) Commercial, financial, agricultural and other . . . . . Real estate construction . . . . . Residential real estate . . . . . . . Commercial real estate . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 6 10 22 51 $ 100 2,554 0 17,202 $19,856 $ 475 86 515 24,226 $25,302 $2,218 0 601 2,311 $5,130 $ 2,793 2,640 1,116 43,739 $50,288 $ 2,749 2,852 1,100 25,292 $31,993 Reason for Modification 2010 Number of Contracts Extend Maturity Modify Rate Modify Payments Total Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Post- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment (dollars in thousands) 7 2 2 4 15 $250 109 0 0 $359 $ 105 2,070 13 10,685 $12,873 $36,591 0 57 241 $36,889 $36,946 2,179 70 10,926 $50,121 $21,180 1,051 67 9,870 $32,168 Commercial, financial, agricultural and other . . . . . Real estate construction . . . . . Residential real estate . . . . . . . Commercial real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total 87 Specific Reserve $4,237 200 69 409 0 $4,915 Specific Reserve $ 743 0 65 507 $1,315 Specific Reserve $4,972 0 0 3 $4,975 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 12—Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses (Continued) Impaired Loans (Continued) The troubled debt restructurings included in the above tables are also included in the impaired loan tables provided earlier in this footnote. Loans defined as modified due to a change in rate include loans that were modified for a change in rate as well as a reamortization of the principal and an extension of the maturity. For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, $4.7 million, $25.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively, of total rate modifications represent loans with modifications to the rate as well as payment due to reamortization. A troubled debt restructuring is considered to be in default when a restructured loan is 90 days or more past due. As of December 31, 2012, there were no loans restructured within the preceding twelve months which were considered to be in default. As of December 31, 2011, a $4.1 million commercial real estate loan, restructured during the first quarter of 2011 was considered to be in default. As of December 31, 2011, this loan was transferred to held for sale and the sale was completed in 2012. As of December 31, 2010, there were no loans restructured within the preceding twelve months which were considered to be in default. The following tables provide detail related to the allowance for credit losses for the years ended December 31: 2012 Commercial, financial, agricultural and other Real estate construction Residential real estate Commercial real estate Loans to individuals Unallocated Total (dollars in thousands) Allowance for credit losses: Beginning Balance . . . . . . . . $ Charge-offs . . . . . . . . . . Recoveries . . . . . . . . . . . Provision . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,200 (5,207) 443 6,416 $ 6,756 (3,601) 582 5,191 Ending Balance . . . . . . . . . . . $ 19,852 $ 8,928 Ending balance: individually evaluated for impaired . . . $ 10,331 $ 300 Ending balance: collectively $ $ $ 8,237 $ (3,828) 422 1,077 18,961 $ (851) 410 3,921 4,244 (3,482) 521 2,849 5,908 $ 22,441 $ 4,132 $4,836 0 0 1,090 $5,926 780 $ 6,367 $ 0 $ 0 $ $ $ 61,234 (16,969) 2,378 20,544 67,187 17,778 evaluated for impaired . . . 9,521 8,628 5,128 16,074 4,132 5,926 49,409 Loans: Ending balance . . . . . . . . . . . Ending balance: individually evaluated for impaired . . . Ending balance: collectively 1,019,822 87,438 1,241,565 1,273,661 582,218 33,443 11,177 6,444 49,123 0 evaluated for impaired . . . 986,379 76,261 1,235,121 1,224,538 582,218 4,204,704 100,187 4,104,517 88 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 12—Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses (Continued) Impaired Loans (Continued) 2011 Commercial, financial, agricultural and other Real estate construction Residential real estate Commercial real estate Loans to individuals Unallocated Total Allowance for credit losses: Beginning Balance . . . . . . . . Charge-offs . . . . . . . . . . Recoveries . . . . . . . . . . . Provision . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 21,700 (7,114) 473 3,141 $ 18,002 (28,886) 955 16,685 Ending Balance . . . . . . . . . . . $ 18,200 $ 6,756 (dollars in thousands) 5,454 $ (4,107) 132 6,758 16,913 $ (24,861) 349 26,560 4,215 (3,325) 573 2,781 $4,945 0 0 (109) 8,237 $ 18,961 $ 4,244 $4,836 93 $ 1,114 $ 0 $ 0 $ $ $ Ending balance: individually evaluated for impaired . . . Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impaired . . . Loans: Ending balance . . . . . . . . . . . Ending balance: individually evaluated for impaired . . . Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impaired . . . $ 9,069 $ 2,960 9,131 3,796 8,144 17,847 4,244 4,836 996,739 76,564 1,137,059 1,267,432 565,849 37,639 14,667 2,606 39,832 0 959,100 61,897 1,134,453 1,227,600 565,849 2010 Commercial, financial, agricultural and other Real estate construction Residential real estate Commercial real estate Loans to individuals Unallocated Total Allowance for credit losses: Beginning Balance . . . . . . . . Charge-offs . . . . . . . . . . Recoveries . . . . . . . . . . . Provision . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 31,369 (22,293) 2,409 10,215 $ 18,224 (41,483) 0 41,261 Ending Balance . . . . . . . . . . . $ 21,700 $ 18,002 (dollars in thousands) 5,847 $ (5,226) 252 4,581 17,526 $ (2,466) 163 1,690 4,731 (3,841) 523 2,802 5,454 $ 16,913 $ 4,215 $3,942 0 0 1,003 $4,945 56 $ 5,287 $ 0 $ 0 $ $ $ Ending balance: individually evaluated for impaired . . . Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impaired . . . Loans: Ending balance . . . . . . . . . . . Ending balance: individually evaluated for impaired . . . Ending balance: collectively $ 6,709 $ 11,855 14,991 6,147 5,398 11,626 4,215 4,945 913,814 261,482 1,127,273 1,354,074 561,440 25,694 44,485 832 42,863 0 evaluated for impaired . . . 888,120 216,997 1,126,441 1,311,211 561,440 89 $ $ $ 71,229 (68,293) 2,482 55,816 61,234 13,236 47,998 4,043,643 94,744 3,948,899 $ $ $ 81,639 (75,309) 3,347 61,552 71,229 23,907 47,322 4,218,083 113,874 4,104,209 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 13—Variable Interest Entities As defined by FASB ASC 810-10, “Consolidation,” a Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”) is a corporation, partnership, trust or any other legal structure used for business purposes that either (a) does not have equity investors with voting rights or (b) has equity investors that do not provide sufficient financial resources for the entity to support its activities. Under ASC 810-10, an entity that holds a variable interest in a VIE is required to consolidate the VIE if the entity is deemed to be the primary beneficiary, which generally means it is subject to a majority of the risk of loss from the VIE’s activities, is entitled to receive a majority of the entity’s residual returns, or both. First Commonwealth’s VIEs are evaluated under the guidance included in ASU 2009-17. These VIEs include qualified affordable housing projects that First Commonwealth has invested in as part of its community reinvestment initiatives. We periodically assess whether or not our variable interests in these VIEs, based on qualitative analysis, provide us with a controlling interest in the VIE. The analysis includes an assessment of the characteristics of the VIE. We do not have a controlling financial interest in the VIE, which would require consolidation of the VIE, as we do not have the following characteristics: (1) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance; and (2) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. First Commonwealth’s maximum potential exposure is equal to its carrying value and is summarized in the table below as of December 31: Low Income Housing Limited Partnership Investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2012 2011 (dollars in thousands) $667 $347 Note 14—Commitments and Letters of Credit First Commonwealth is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financial needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and commercial letters of credit. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the statements of financial condition. First Commonwealth’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party of the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and commercial letters of credit is represented by the contract or notional amount of those instruments. First Commonwealth uses the same credit policies for underwriting all loans, including these commitments and conditional obligations. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, First Commonwealth did not own or trade other financial instruments with significant off-balance sheet risk including derivatives such as futures, forwards, option contracts and the like, although such instruments may be appropriate to use in the future to manage interest rate risk. See Note 7 “Derivatives” for a description of interest rate swaps provided to customers. The following table identifies the notional amount of those instruments at December 31: Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk: Commitments to extend credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Financial standby letters of credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Performance standby letters of credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Commercial letters of credit $1,506,618 47,185 69,240 685 $1,495,009 53,689 76,371 1,297 2012 2011 (dollars in thousands) 90 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 14—Commitments and Letters of Credit (Continued) Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. First Commonwealth evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by First Commonwealth upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral that is held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, and residential and income-producing commercial properties. Standby letters of credit and commercial letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by First Commonwealth to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The current notional amounts outstanding at December 31, 2012 include financial standby letters of credit of $0.4 million, performance standby letters of credit of $10.9 million and commercial letters of credit of $0.4 million issued during 2012. A liability of $0.2 million has been recorded as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, which represents the estimated fair value of letters of credit issued. The fair value of letters of credit is estimated based on the unrecognized portion of fees received at the time the commitment was issued. Unused commitments and letters of credit provide exposure to future credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the borrower or guaranteed parties. Management’s evaluation of the credit risk in these commitments resulted in the recording of a liability of $2.4 million and $1.5 million as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The credit risk evaluation incorporated probability of default, loss given default and estimated utilization for the next twelve months for each loan category and the letters of credit. Note 15—Premises and Equipment Premises and equipment are described as follows: Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Buildings and improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Leasehold improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Furniture and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Software . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less accumulated depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total premises and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Estimated Useful Life 2012 2011 Indefinite 10-50 years 5-40 years 3-10 years 3-10 years (dollars in thousands) $ 12,503 81,328 14,617 79,181 40,199 $ 12,513 81,072 14,536 79,722 33,479 227,828 158,858 221,322 154,567 $ 68,970 $ 66,755 Depreciation related to premises and equipment included in noninterest expense for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 amounted to $7.9 million, $8.3 million and $8.6 million, respectively. 91 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 15—Premises and Equipment (Continued) First Commonwealth leases various premises and assorted equipment under non-cancelable agreements. Total future minimal rental commitments at December 31, 2012, were as follows: 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Therafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Premises Equipment (dollars in thousands) $207 18 0 0 0 0 $ 3,341 3,166 2,979 2,795 2,544 17,070 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $31,895 $225 Included in the lease commitments above is $431 thousand in lease payments to be paid under a sale-leaseback arrangement. The sale-leaseback transaction occurred in 2005 and resulted in a gain of $297 thousand on the sale of a branch that is being recognized over the 15 year lease term through 2020. Increases in utilities and taxes that may be passed on to the lessee under the terms of various lease agreements are not reflected in the above table. However, certain lease agreements provide for increases in rental payments based upon historical increases in the consumer price index or the lessor’s cost of operating the facility, and are included in the minimum lease commitments. Additionally, the table above includes rent expense that is recognized for rent holidays and during construction periods. Total lease expense amounted to $4.3 million in 2012, and $4.4 million in both 2011 and 2010. Note 16—Goodwill and Other Amortizing Intangible Assets FASB ASC Topic 350-20, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other” requires an annual valuation of the fair value of a reporting unit that has goodwill and a comparison of the fair value to the book value of equity to determine whether the goodwill has been impaired. Goodwill is also required to be tested on an interim basis if an event or circumstance indicates that it is more likely than not that an impairment loss has been incurred. When triggering events or circumstances indicate goodwill testing is required, an assessment of qualitative factors can be completed before performing the two step goodwill impairment test. ASU 2011-08 provides that if an assessment of qualitative factors determines it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, then the two step goodwill impairment test is not required. We consider First Commonwealth to be one reporting unit. The carrying amount of goodwill as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $159.9 million. No impairment charges on goodwill or other intangible assets were incurred in 2012, 2011 or 2010. We test goodwill for impairment as of November 30th each year and again at any quarter-end if any material events occur during a quarter that may affect goodwill. An assessment of qualitative factors was completed as of December 31, 2012 and indicated that it is more likely than not that the fair value of First Commonwealth exceeds its carrying amount, therefore the two step goodwill impairment test was not considered necessary. The assessment of qualitative factors incorporated the results of the Step 1 goodwill impairment test completed as of November 30, 2012 as well as macroeconomic factors, industry and market considerations, the company’s overall financial performance, and other company specific events occurring since the completion of the November 30, 2012 test. 92 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 16—Goodwill and Other Amortizing Intangible Assets (Continued) As of November 30, 2012, our annual goodwill test was completed. The first step compares the estimated fair value of First Commonwealth with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the estimated fair value exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill is not considered impaired. However, if the carrying amount exceeds its estimated fair value, a second step would be performed that would compare the implied fair value to the carrying amount of goodwill. An impairment loss would be recorded to the extent that the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. Fair value may be determined using market prices, comparison to similar assets, market multiples, discounted cash flow analysis and other variables. Our Step 1 test for potential goodwill impairment incorporates both income and market based analyses. The income analysis used in our Step 1 incorporates estimated cash flows which extend five years into the future and, by their nature, are difficult to estimate over such an extended time- frame. Factors that may significantly affect the estimates used in our Step 1 income analysis include, but are not limited to, balance sheet growth assumptions, credit losses in our investment and loan portfolios, competitive pressures in our market area, changes in customer base and customer product preferences, changes in revenue growth trends, cost structure, changes in discount rates, conditions in the banking sector and general economic variables. The market approach used in the Step 1 test calculates the change of control price a market participant would pay by adding a change of control premium to the current trading value of the Company. As of November 30, 2012, our Step 1 goodwill analysis indicated that our fair value was approximately 6% above book value. Therefore in accordance with ASC Topic 350-20-35-8, a Step 2 analysis was not necessary and goodwill was not considered impaired. As of December 31, 2012, goodwill was not considered impaired; however, changing economic conditions that may adversely affect our performance, fair value of our assets and liabilities, or stock price could result in impairment, which could adversely affect earnings in future periods. Management will continue to monitor events that could impact this conclusion in the future. FASB ASC Topic 350, “Intangibles—Other” also requires that an acquired intangible asset be separately recognized if the benefit of the intangible asset is obtained through contractual or other legal rights, or if the asset can be sold, transferred, licensed, rented or exchanged, regardless of the acquirer’s intent to do so. The following table summarizes other intangible assets, which for each year includes only core deposit intangibles: Gross Intangible Assets Accumulated Amortization Net Intangible Assets December 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (dollars in thousands) $(20,095) $(18,627) $22,470 $22,470 $2,375 $3,843 Core deposits are amortized over their expected lives using the present value of the benefit of the core deposits and straight-line methods of amortization. The core deposits have a remaining amortization period of seven years and a weighted average amortization period of approximately three and a half years. First Commonwealth recognized amortization expense on other intangible assets of $1.5 million, $1.5 million, and $2.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. 93 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 16—Goodwill and Other Amortizing Intangible Assets (Continued) The following presents the estimated amortization expense of core deposit intangibles: 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Therafter Core Deposit Intangibles (dollars in thousands) $1,064 615 337 177 62 120 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,375 Note 17—Interest-Bearing Deposits Components of interest-bearing deposits at December 31 were as follows: 2012 2011 Interest-bearing demand deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Savings deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Time deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (dollars in thousands) 97,963 2,543,990 1,032,659 95,945 2,430,802 1,197,560 $ Total interest-bearing deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3,674,612 $3,724,307 Interest-bearing deposits at December 31, 2012 and 2011, include allocations from interest-bearing demand deposit accounts of $581.5 million and $541.7 million, respectively, into savings which includes money market accounts. These reallocations are based on a formula and have been made to reduce First Commonwealth’s reserve requirement in compliance with regulatory guidelines. Included in time deposits at December 31, 2012 and 2011, were certificates of deposit in denominations of $100 thousand or more of $322.4 million and $317.0 million, respectively. Interest expense related to certificates of deposit $100 thousand or greater amounted to $5.3 million in 2012, $7.4 million in 2011 and $9.4 million in 2010. Included in time deposits at December 31, 2012, were certificates of deposit with the following scheduled maturities (dollars in thousands): 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2017 and thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 503,806 245,699 163,531 82,024 37,599 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,032,659 94 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 18—Short-term Borrowings Short-term borrowings at December 31 were as follows: 2012 2011 2010 Ending Balance Average Balance Average Rate Ending Balance Average Balance Average Rate Ending Balance Average Balance Average Rate Federal funds purchased . . . . . . . . $ 34,000 $ 47,727 Borrowings from FHLB . . . . . . . . 178,100 214,703 Securities sold under agreements (dollars in thousands) 0.27% $ 75,300 $ 15,642 7,537 84,000 0.25 0.26% $ 0.21 12,800 $ 40,322 0 277,329 0.26% 0.39 to repurchase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144,127 139,766 0.28 153,477 155,551 0.43 170,563 165,945 0.47 Treasury, tax and loan note option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0.00 0 4,134 0.00 4,498 4,482 0.00 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $356,227 $402,196 0.27 $312,777 $182,864 0.40 $ 187,861 $488,078 0.40 Maximum total at any month-end . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $486,144 $312,777 $1,000,753 Weighted average rate at year-end . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.25% 0.28% 0.43% Interest expense on short-term borrowings for the years ended December 31 is detailed below: 2012 2011 2010 Federal funds purchased . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Borrowings from FHLB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Securities sold under agreements to repurchase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (dollars in thousands) $ 41 16 671 $ 105 1,069 774 $ 128 545 397 Total interest on short-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,070 $728 $1,948 Note 19—Subordinated Debentures Subordinated Debentures outstanding at December 31 are as follows: 2012 2011 Due Amount Rate Amount Rate (dollars in thousands) Owed to: First Commonwealth Capital Trust I . . . . . First Commonwealth Capital Trust II . . . . . First Commonwealth Capital Trust III . . . . 2029 2034 2034 $ 33,583 9.50% $ 33,583 9.50% 30,929 LIBOR + 2.85 41,238 LIBOR + 2.85 30,929 LIBOR + 2.85 41,238 LIBOR + 2.85 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $105,750 $105,750 First Commonwealth has established three trusts, First Commonwealth Capital Trust I, First Commonwealth Capital Trust II, and First Commonwealth Capital Trust III, of which 100% of the common equity is owned by First Commonwealth. The trusts were formed for the purpose of issuing company obligated mandatorily redeemable capital securities to third-party investors and investing the proceeds from the sale of the capital securities solely in junior subordinated debt securities (“subordinated debentures”) of First Commonwealth. The subordinated debentures held by each trust are the sole assets of the trust. 95 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 19—Subordinated Debentures (Continued) Interest on the debentures issued to First Commonwealth Capital Trust III is paid quarterly at a floating rate of LIBOR plus 2.85% which is reset quarterly. Subject to regulatory approval, First Commonwealth may redeem the debentures, in whole or in part, at its option on any interest payment date at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the debentures, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of the redemption. Deferred issuance costs of $630 thousand are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the securities. Interest on the debentures issued to First Commonwealth Capital Trust II is paid quarterly at a floating rate of LIBOR plus 2.85%, which is reset quarterly. Subject to regulatory approval, First Commonwealth may redeem the debentures, in whole or in part, at its option at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the debentures, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of the redemption. Deferred issuance costs of $471 thousand are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the securities. Interest on debentures issued to First Commonwealth Capital Trust I is paid semiannually at a fixed rate of 9.50%. Deferred issuance costs of $996 thousand are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the securities. On January 29, 2013, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the redemption of 100% of the debenture on April 1, 2013, at a redemption price of 103.325% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of the redemption. Note 20—Other Long-term Debt Other long-term debt at December 31 follows: 2012 Weighted Average Contractual Rate Weighted Average Effective Rate Amount 2011 Weighted Average Contractual Rate Amount Weighted Average Effective Rate (dollars in thousands) $ 1,600 LIBOR + 1.00% LIBOR + 1.00% ESOP loan due: 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Borrowings from FHLB due: 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thereafter $ 30,085 57,890 79,970 387 405 5,734 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $174,471 2.32% 1.13 0.82 4.64 4.64 4.66 2.32% 1.13 0.82 4.64 4.64 4.66 25,585 30,085 7,891 29,970 388 6,145 $101,664 1.54% 2.32 5.37 1.37 4.64 4.66 1.53 2.32 5.35 1.37 4.64 4.66 The weighted average contractual rate reflects the rate due to creditors. The weighted average effective rate of long-term debt in the schedule above includes the effect of purchase accounting valuation adjustments that were recorded in connection with prior business combinations. An FHLB advance in the amount of $7.5 million is convertible on a quarterly basis at the FHLB’s option into floating rate debt indexed to 3 month LIBOR. All of First Commonwealth’s Federal Home Loan Bank stock, along with an interest in mortgage loans and mortgage backed securities—residential has been pledged as collateral with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh. 96 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 20—Other Long-term Debt (Continued) Capital securities included in total long-term debt on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition are excluded from the above, but are described in Note 19 “Subordinated Debentures.” Scheduled loan payments for other long-term debt are summarized below: 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Thereafter Total Long-term debt payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Purchase valuation amortization . . . . . . . . . $29,968 117 $57,852 38 (dollars in thousands) $405 $387 0 0 $79,970 0 $5,734 0 $174,316 155 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $30,085 $57,890 $79,970 $387 $405 $5,734 $174,471 The amounts on the purchase valuation amortization row in the table above include fair market adjustments from prior business combinations. Note 21—Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” requires disclosures for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). All non-financial assets are included either as a separate line item on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition or in the “Other assets” category of the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Currently, First Commonwealth does not have any non-financial liabilities to disclose. FASB ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments” permits entities to irrevocably elect to measure select financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The unrealized gains and losses are required to be included in earnings each reporting period for the items that fair value measurement is elected. First Commonwealth has elected not to measure any existing financial instruments at fair value under FASB ASC Topic 825; however, in the future we may elect to adopt this guidance for select financial instruments. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 820, First Commonwealth groups financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value in three levels, based on the principal markets in which the assets and liabilities are transacted and the observability of the data points used to determine fair value. These levels are: • • Level 1—Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in active exchange markets, such as the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). Valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities. Level 1 securities include equity holdings comprised of publicly traded bank stocks which were priced using quoted market prices. Level 2—Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in less active dealer or broker markets. Valuations are obtained for identical or comparable assets or liabilities from alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. Level 2 includes Obligations of U.S. Government securities issued by Agencies and Sponsored Enterprises, Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions, certain corporate securities, FHLB stock, interest rate derivatives that include interest rate swaps and risk participation agreements, certain other real estate owned and certain impaired loans. Level 2 investment securities are valued by a recognized third party pricing service using observable inputs. The model used by the pricing service varies by asset class and incorporates available market, trade and bid information as well as cash flow information when applicable. Because many fixed-income investment securities 97 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 21—Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities (Continued) do not trade on a daily basis, the model uses available information such as benchmark yield curves, benchmarking of like investment securities, sector groupings and matrix pricing. The model will also use processes such as an option adjusted spread to assess the impact of interest rates and to develop prepayment estimates. Market inputs normally used in the pricing model include benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/ dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers and reference data including market research publications. Management validates the market values provided by the third party service by having another recognized pricing service price 100% of the securities on an annual basis and a random sample of securities each quarter, monthly monitoring of variances from prior period pricing and on a monthly basis evaluating pricing changes compared to expectations based on changes in the financial markets. Other Investments is comprised of FHLB stock whose estimated fair value is based on its par value. Additional information on FHLB stock is provided in Note 10 “Other investments.” Interest rate derivatives are reported at estimated fair value utilizing Level 2 inputs and are included in Other assets and Other liabilities and consist of interest rate swaps where there is no significant deterioration in the counterparties (loan customers) credit risk since origination of the interest rate swap. First Commonwealth values its interest rate swap positions using a yield curve by taking market prices/rates for an appropriate set of instruments. The set of instruments currently used to determine the U.S. Dollar yield curve includes cash LIBOR rates from overnight to three months, Eurodollar futures contracts and swap rates from three years to thirty years. These yield curves determine the valuations of interest rate swaps. Interest rate derivatives are further described in Note 7 “Derivatives.” For purposes of potential valuation adjustments to our derivative positions, First Commonwealth evaluates the credit risk of its counterparties as well as our own credit risk. Accordingly, we have considered factors such as the likelihood of default, expected loss given default, net exposures and remaining contractual life, among other things, in determining if any estimated fair value adjustments related to credit risk are required. We review our counterparty exposure quarterly, and when necessary, appropriate adjustments are made to reflect the exposure. We also utilize this approach to estimate our own credit risk on derivative liability positions. In 2012, we have not realized any losses due to a counterparties inability to pay any net uncollateralized position. The estimated fair value for other real estate owned included in Level 2 is determined by either an independent market based appraisal less estimated costs to sell or an executed sales agreement. • Level 3—Valuations for assets and liabilities that are derived from other valuation methodologies, including option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques, and not based on market exchange, dealer or broker traded transactions. If the inputs used to provide the valuation are unobservable and/or there is very little, if any, market activity for the security or similar securities, the securities would be considered Level 3 securities. Level 3 valuations incorporate certain assumptions and projections in determining the fair value assigned to such assets or liabilities. The assets included in Level 3 are pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations, non-marketable equity investments, loans held for sale, certain interest rate derivatives, certain impaired loans and certain other real estate. Our pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations are collateralized by the trust preferred securities of individual banks, thrifts and bank holding companies in the U.S. There has been little or no active trading in 98 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 21—Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities (Continued) these securities since 2009; therefore it was more appropriate to determine estimated fair value using a discounted cash flow analysis. Detail on the process for determining appropriate cash flows for this analysis is provided in Note 11 “Impairment of Investment Securities.” The discount rate applied to the cash flows is determined by evaluating the current market yields for comparable corporate and structured credit products along with an evaluation of the risks associated with the cash flows of the comparable security. Due to the fact that there is no active market for the pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations, one key reference point is the market yield for the single issue trust preferred securities issued by banks and thrifts for which there is more activity than for the pooled securities. Adjustments are then made to reflect the credit and structural differences between these two security types. Management validates the estimated fair value of the pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations by monitoring the performance of the underlying collateral, discussing the discount rate, cash flow assumptions and general market trends with the specialized third party and by confirming changes in the underlying collateral to the trustee and underwriter reports. Management’s monitoring of the underlying collateral includes deferrals of interest payments, payment defaults, cures of previously deferred interest payments, any regulatory filings or actions and general news related to the underlying collateral. Management also evaluates fair value changes compared to expectations based on changes in the interest rates used in determining the discount rate and general financial markets. The estimated fair value of the non-marketable equity investments included in level 3 is based on par value. Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value with the fair value being the expected sales price of the loan. The estimated fair value of the loans held for sale was determined by calculating the discounted expected future cash flows of the loan. The discount rate applied to the future cash flows was determined based on a risk based expected return and capital structure of potential buyers. If a sales agreement has been executed, the fair value is equal to the sales price. For interest rate derivatives included in Level 3, the fair value incorporates credit risk by considering such factors as likelihood of default and expected loss given default based on the credit quality of the underlying counterparties (loan customers). In 2012, we have not realized any losses due to a counterparty’s inability to pay any net uncollateralized position. However, as the result of deterioration in the counterparties (loan customers) credit quality for certain interest rate derivatives, future amounts previously believed to be collectible under the terms of the interest rate derivative have now been deemed to be uncollectible. 99 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 21—Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities (Continued) In accordance with ASU 2011-04, the following table provides information related to quantitative inputs and assumptions used in Level 3 fair value measurements. Fair Value (dollars in thousands) Valuation Technique Unobservable Inputs Range / (weighted average) Pooled Trust Preferred Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $23,373 Discounted Cash Flow Probability of default 0% - 100% (21.95%) 0% - 100% (12.20%) 6.50% - 20.00%(a) N/A Prepayment rates Discount rates N/A Other Investments . . . . . . . . . . Interest Rate Swap . . . . . . . . . . Impaired Loans . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,420 0 751(c) Par Value Option model Reserve study Counterparty credit risk 9.66% - 11.95%(b) Discount rate Gas per MCF Oil per BBL/d NGL per gallon N/A 10.00% $2.92 - $5.48(d) $84.64 - $96.86(d) $1.42(d) N/A(a) Other Real Estate Owned . . . . . 247 Internal Valuation (a) (b) (c) incorporates spread over risk free rate related primarily to credit quality and illiquidity of securities. represents the range of the credit spread curve used in valuation. the remainder of impaired loans valued using Level 3 inputs are not included in this disclosure as the values of those loans are based on bankruptcy agreement documentation. (d) unobservable inputs are defined as follows: MCF—million cubic feet; BBL/d—barrels per day; NGL— natural gas liquid. The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of pooled trust preferred securities are the probability of default, discount rates and prepayment rates. Significant increases in the probability of default or discount rate used would result in a decrease in the estimated fair value of these securities while decreases in these variables would result in higher fair value measurements. In general, a change in the assumption of probability of default is accompanied by a directionally similar change in the discount rate. In most cases, increases in the prepayment rate assumptions would result in a higher estimated fair value for these securities while decreases would provide for a lower value. The direction of this change is somewhat dependent on the structure of the investment and the amount of the investment tranches senior to our position. The discount rate is the significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of impaired loans. Significant increases in this rate would result in a decrease in the estimated fair value of the loans, while a decrease in this rate would result in higher fair value measurement. Other unobservable inputs in the fair value measurement of impaired loans relate to gas, oil and natural gas prices and increases in these rates would result in an increase in the estimated fair value of the loans, while a decrease in these prices would result in a lower fair value measurement. The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of interest rate swaps classified as Level 3 is counterparty credit risk and the resulting range of the credit spread curve used in the valuation. Higher credit risk would result in an increased credit spread, which would reduce the fair value of the interest rate swap. 100 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 21—Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities (Continued) The tables below present the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31: 2012 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total (dollars in thousands) Obligations of U.S. Government Agencies: Mortgage-Backed Securities—Residential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Obligations of U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mortgage-Backed Securities—Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities—Commercial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other Government-Sponsored Enterprises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Corporate Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pooled Trust Preferred Collateralized Debt Obligations . . . . . . . . . Total Debt Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total Securities Available for Sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other Investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loans Held for Sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other Assets (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 555 555 0 0 0 $ 31,664 $ 0 $ 31,664 864,401 149 242,664 86 6,991 0 1,145,955 0 1,145,955 28,228 0 16,480 0 0 0 0 0 23,373 23,373 1,420 24,793 0 0 0 864,401 149 242,664 86 6,991 23,373 1,169,328 1,975 1,171,303 28,228 0 16,480 Total Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $555 $1,190,663 $24,793 $1,216,011 Other Liabilities (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 0 0 $ $ 18,726 18,726 $ $ 0 0 $ $ 18,726 18,726 (a) Non-hedging interest rate derivatives 101 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 21—Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities (Continued) 2011 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total (dollars in thousands) Obligations of U.S. Government Agencies: Mortgage-Backed Securities—Residential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Obligations of U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mortgage-Backed Securities—Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities—Commercial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other Government-Sponsored Enterprises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Corporate Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pooled Trust Preferred Collateralized Debt Obligations . . . . . . . . . Total Debt Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total Securities Available for Sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other Investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loans Held for Sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other Assets (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 440 440 0 0 0 $ 36,194 $ 0 $ 36,194 801,031 193 268,648 459 11,411 0 1,117,936 0 1,117,936 39,796 0 16,064 0 0 0 0 0 22,980 22,980 1,420 24,400 0 13,412 0 801,031 193 268,648 459 11,411 22,980 1,140,916 1,860 1,142,776 39,796 13,412 16,064 Total Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $440 $1,173,796 $37,812 $1,212,048 Other Liabilities (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 0 0 $ $ 18,986 18,986 $ $ 0 0 $ $ 18,986 18,986 (a) Non-hedging interest rate derivatives The changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized as follows at for the year ended December 31, 2012: Pooled Trust Preferred Collateralized Debt Obligations Loans Held for Sale Equities Other Assets Total Balance, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total gains or losses $22,980 Included in earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Included in other comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . Purchases, issuances, sales, and settlements Purchases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Issuances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Settlements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transfers from Level 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transfers into Level 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 5,490 0 0 0 (5,097) 0 0 (dollars in thousands) $ $ 13,412 $1,420 0 $ 37,812 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,870 0 (461) 0 2,409 5,490 0 0 (15,981) (301) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 461 0 0 (15,981) (5,398) 0 461 Balance, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $23,373 $1,420 $ 0 $ 0 $ 24,793 There are no gains or losses included in earnings for the period that are attributable to the change in realized gains (losses) relating to assets held at December 31, 2012. 102 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 21—Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities (Continued) During the year ended December 31, 2012, there were no transfers between fair value Levels 1 and 2. However, $0.5 million of interest rate swaps were transferred into Level 3 from Level 2 due to deterioration of the counterparty’s credit risk. Because the credit quality of the underlying counterparty declined below investment grade, the swaps were valued utilizing more than interest rate yield curves. The changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized as follows for the year ended December 31, 2011: Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions Corporate Securities Pooled Trust Preferred Collateralized Debt Obligations Loans Held for Sale Equities Other Assets Total $ 343 $ 21,376 $26,352 $1,570 $ 0 $ 0 $ 49,641 (dollars in thousands) 4 387 0 (150) Balance, beginning of year . . . . . . Total gains or losses Included in earnings . . . . . . . Included in other comprehensive income . . . (20) (98) 1,284 Purchases, issuances, sales, and settlements Purchases . . . . . . . . . . . . Issuances . . . . . . . . . . . . Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Settlements . . . . . . . . . . Transfers from Level 3 . . . . . . . . . Transfers into Level 3 . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 (327) 0 0 0 0 0 (6,700) (3,000) (11,965) 0 0 0 0 (4,656) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (4,449) (4,208) 0 1,166 0 0 0 0 0 13,412 0 0 0 (71) 0 4,520 0 0 (7,027) (7,727) (11,965) 17,932 Balance, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0 $ 0 $22,980 $1,420 $13,412 $ 0 $ 37,812 There are no gains or losses included in earnings for the period that are attributable to the change in realized gains (losses) relating to assets held at December 31, 2011. During 2011, $12.0 million of corporate securities were transferred from Level 3 to Level 2. Corporate securities were transferred from Level 3 to Level 2 based on the increased frequency in the volumes of observable trades. Fair values on these securities at December 31, 2011 were determined based on market data, including trade and bid prices. Also, during 2011, $4.5 million of interest rate swaps were transferred into Level 3 from Level 2 due to deterioration of the counterparty’s credit risk and were terminated before December 31, 2011. The tables below present the balances of assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at December 31 and total gains and losses realized on these assets during the year ended December 31: 2012 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total (dollars in thousands) Total Gains (Losses) Impaired loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other real estate owned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $0 0 $0 $82,949 11,981 $6,827 247 $ 89,776 12,228 $(13,793) (3,772) $94,930 $7,074 $102,004 $(17,565) 103 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 21—Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities (Continued) 2011 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total (dollars in thousands) Total Gains (Losses) Impaired loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other real estate owned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $0 0 $0 $ 73,783 31,232 $26,349 438 $100,132 31,670 $(24,636) (8,643) $105,015 $26,787 $131,802 $(33,279) Impaired loans over $0.1 million are individually reviewed to determine the amount of each loan considered to be at risk of noncollection. The fair value for impaired loans that are collateral based is determined by reviewing real property appraisals, equipment valuations, accounts receivable listings and other financial information. A discounted cash flow analysis is performed to determine fair value for impaired loans when an observable market price or a current appraisal is not available. First Commonwealth’s loan policy requires updated appraisals be obtained at least every twelve months on all impaired loans with balances of $250 thousand and over. The fair value for other real estate owned is determined by either an independent market based appraisal less estimated costs to sell or an executed sales agreement and is classified as level 2. Other real estate owned has a current carrying value of $11.3 million as of December 31, 2012 and consisted primarily of a manufacturing plant in northern Pennsylvania, residential real estate in eastern Pennsylvania and commercial real estate property in eastern Pennsylvania. We review whether events and circumstances subsequent to a transfer to other real estate owned have occurred that indicate the balance of those assets may not be recoverable. If events and circumstances indicate further impairment, we will record a charge to the extent that the carrying value of the assets exceed their fair values, less estimated costs to sell, as determined by valuation techniques appropriate in the circumstances. Certain other assets and liabilities, including goodwill and core deposit intangibles, are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments only in certain circumstances. Additional information related to this measurement is provided in Note 16 “Goodwill and Other Amortizing Intangible Assets.” There were no other assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during 2012. FASB ASC Topic 825-10, “Transition Related to FSP FAS 107-1” and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” requires disclosure of the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities, including those financial assets and financial liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis or nonrecurring basis. The methodologies for estimating the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis are as discussed above. The methodologies for other financial assets and financial liabilities are discussed below. Cash and due from banks and interest bearing bank deposits: The carrying amounts for cash and due from banks and interest-bearing bank deposits approximate the estimated fair values of such assets. Securities: Fair values for securities available for sale and securities held to maturity are based on quoted market prices, if available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable instruments. Pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations values are derived from other valuation methodologies, including option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques, and not based on market exchange, dealer or broker traded transactions. These valuations incorporate certain assumptions and projections in determining the fair value assigned to each instrument. The carrying value of other investments, which includes FHLB stock, is considered a reasonable estimate of fair value. 104 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 21—Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities (Continued) Loans held for sale: The fair value of loans held for sale are estimated utilizing a present value of future discounted cash flows of the loan utilizing a risk based expected return to discount the value unless a sales agreement has been executed, in which case the sales price would equal fair value. Loans: The fair values of all loans are estimated by discounting the estimated future cash flows using interest rates currently offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality adjusted for past due and nonperforming loans which is not an exit price under FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.” Off-balance sheet instruments: Many of First Commonwealth’s off-balance sheet instruments, primarily loan commitments and standby letters of credit, are expected to expire without being drawn upon; therefore, the commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. FASB ASC Topic 460, “Guarantees” clarified that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. The carrying amount and estimated fair value for standby letters of credit was $0.2 million at December 31, 2012 and 2011. See Note 14 “Commitments and Letters of Credit,” for additional information. Deposit liabilities: Management estimates the fair value of deposits based on a market valuation of similar deposits. The carrying value of variable rate time deposit accounts and certificates of deposit approximate their fair values at the report date. Also, fair values of fixed rate time deposits for both periods are estimated by discounting the future cash flows using interest rates currently being offered and a schedule of aggregated expected maturities. Short-term borrowings: The fair values of borrowings from the FHLB were estimated based on the estimated incremental borrowing rate for similar types of borrowings. The carrying amounts of other short-term borrowings such as federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreement to repurchase were used to approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of the borrowings. Long-term debt and subordinated debt: The fair value of long-term debt and subordinated debt is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using First Commonwealth’s estimated incremental borrowing rate for similar types of borrowing arrangements. 105 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 21—Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities (Continued) The following table presents carrying amounts and estimated fair values of First Commonwealth’s financial instruments at December 31: 2012 Fair Value Measurements Using: Carrying Amount Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 (dollars in thousands) Financial assets Cash and due from banks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest-bearing deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Securities available for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . Other investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loans held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 98,724 4,258 1,171,303 28,228 0 4,204,704 $ 98,724 4,258 1,171,303 28,228 0 4,245,114 $98,724 4,258 555 0 0 0 $ 0 0 1,145,955 28,228 0 82,949 $ 0 0 24,793 0 0 4,162,165 Financial liabilities Deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Short-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Subordinated debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,557,881 356,227 174,471 105,750 4,493,764 356,221 176,178 76,735 0 0 0 0 4,493,764 356,221 176,178 0 0 0 0 76,735 2011 Carrying Amount Estimated Fair Value (dollars in thousands) Financial assets Cash and due from banks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest-bearing deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Securities available for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loans held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 74,967 3,511 1,142,776 39,796 13,412 4,043,643 $ 74,967 3,511 1,142,776 39,796 13,412 4,113,525 Financial liabilities Deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Short-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Subordinated debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,504,684 312,777 101,664 105,750 4,452,235 312,777 103,749 75,310 106 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 22—Income Taxes The income tax provision (benefit) for the years ended December 31 is as follows: Current tax provision for income exclusive of securities transactions: Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $12,035 72 $ 651 161 $ 3,794 59 Deferred tax provision (benefit) Total current tax provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,107 2,551 812 (1,192) 3,853 (3,614) Total tax provision (benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $14,658 $ (380) $ 239 2012 2011 2010 (dollars in thousands) The statutory to effective tax rate reconciliation for the years ended December 31 is as follows: Tax at statutory rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Decrease resulting from: 2012 2011 2010 % of Pretax Income Amount % of Pretax Income Amount % of Pretax Income Amount $19,814 35% $ 5,213 35% $ 8,126 35% (dollars in thousands) Income from bank owned life insurance . . . . . . . . . Tax-exempt interest income, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tax credits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2,048) (2,789) (267) (52) (4) (5) 0 0 (1,959) (3,453) (270) 89 (13) (23) (2) 0 (1,866) (5,688) (304) (29) (8) (25) (1) 0 Total tax provision (benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $14,658 26% $ (380) (3)% $ 239 1% The total tax provision for financial reporting differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to income before taxes. First Commonwealth ordinarily generates an annual effective tax rate that is less than the statutory rate of 35% due to benefits resulting from tax-exempt interest, income from bank owned life insurance and tax benefits associated with low income housing tax credits. The consistent level of tax benefits that reduce First Commonwealth’s tax rate below the 35% statutory rate produced an annual effective tax rate of 26% for the year ended December 31, 2012. The relatively low level of annual pretax income produced a tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2011. 107 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 22—Income Taxes (Continued) The tax effects of temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities that represent significant portions of the deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31 are presented below: 2012 2011 (dollars in thousands) Deferred tax assets: Allowance for credit losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Postretirement benefits other than pensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Alternative minimum tax credit carryforward . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net operating loss carryforward . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Writedown of other real estate owned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other tax credit carryforward . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Swap credit risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued interest on nonaccrual loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other-than-temporary impairment of securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Capitalization of OREO expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation of assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unfunded loan commitment allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $23,515 769 13,026 0 3,647 0 2,203 772 3,887 15,233 847 952 836 1,176 $21,432 841 15,247 1,626 2,876 1,383 2,215 1,037 3,161 15,764 826 0 536 2,822 Total deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66,863 69,766 Deferred tax liabilities: Basis difference in assets acquired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loan origination fees and costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income from unconsolidated subsidiary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unrealized gain on securities available for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation of assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (808) (606) (575) (592) 0 (150) (1,213) (392) (551) (898) (242) (198) Total deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2,731) (3,494) Net deferred tax asset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $64,132 $66,272 The net deferred tax asset of $64.1 million as of December 31, 2012 includes a $13.0 million alternative minimum tax credit carryforward with an indefinite life. There is also a $15.2 million deferred tax asset for other- than-temporary impairment of securities, of which $0.3 million are potential capital losses that can only be utilized if capital gains are realized. Management assesses all available positive and negative evidence to estimate if sufficient future taxable income will be generated to utilize the existing deferred tax assets. In evaluating deferred tax assets, future taxable income of $170.6 million, forecasted over the next three years was considered. The amount of future taxable income used in management’s valuation is based upon management approved forecasts, evaluation of historical earnings levels, proven ability to raise capital to support growth or during times of economic stress and consideration of prudent and feasible potential tax strategies. If future events differ from our current forecasts, a valuation allowance may be required, which could have a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations. Based on our evaluation, including the consideration of the weighting of positive and negative evidence, as of December 31, 2012, management has determined that no valuation allowance is necessary for the deferred tax assets because it is more likely than not that these assets will be realized through future reversals of existing temporary differences and through future taxable income. 108 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 22—Income Taxes (Continued) First Commonwealth adopted new authoritative accounting guidance issued under FASB ASC Topic 740-10, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” as of January 1, 2007, and had no material unrecognized tax benefits or accrued interest and penalties as of December 31, 2012. We do not expect the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits to significantly increase in the next twelve months and will record interest and penalties as a component of noninterest expense. First Commonwealth is subject to routine audits of our tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service as well as all states in which we conduct business. Federal and state income tax years 2009 through 2011 are open for examination as of December 31, 2012. Note 23—Retirement Plans First Commonwealth has a savings plan pursuant to the provisions of section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue code. Under the terms of the plan, in 2012, each participant received an employer contribution in an amount equal to 3% of their compensation. In addition, each participating employee may contribute up to 80% of their compensation to the plan of which up to 4% is matched 50% by the employer’s contribution. The 401(k) plan expense was $2.6 million in 2012, $2.5 million in 2011, and $2.6 million in 2010. First Commonwealth maintains a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) to provide deferred compensation for those employees whose total annual or annualized Plan compensation for a calendar year exceeded the maximum limit of compensation that can be recognized for tax-qualified retirement plans. The purpose of this Plan is to restore some of the benefits lost by eligible employees compared to other employees due to limits and restrictions incorporated into First Commonwealth’s 401(k) Plan and ESOP. Participants in the SERP are eligible to defer (on a pre-tax basis) from 1% to 25% of their Plan compensation (compensation in excess of the tax-qualified plan limit). In 2009, First Commonwealth made a matching contribution to the Plan for each payroll up to the first 4% of their Plan compensation and also made a contribution to the Plan for each payroll equal to 3% of their Plan compensation. In addition, First Commonwealth made a contribution to the Plan at the end of the Plan Year on Plan compensation equal to that percentage of compensation that will be contributed to the ESOP. In April 2009 First Commonwealth suspended all employer contributions. The SERP will continue to supplement First Commonwealth’s 401(k) and ESOP plans and will therefore be modified at the same time and in the same respect as the basic plans are modified in future periods. There was no SERP plan expense in 2012, while $86 thousand was expensed in 2011 and $96 thousand in 2010. Select employees from former acquisitions were covered by postretirement benefit plans which provide medical and life insurance coverage. The measurement date for these plans was December 31. Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions from Prior Acquisitions Net periodic benefit cost of these plans for the years ended December 31, was as follows: 2012 2011 2010 Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest cost on projected benefit obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of transition obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gain amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net periodic benefit cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 (dollars in thousands) $ 0 86 2 (50) $ 38 $ 0 75 2 (32) $ 45 $ 0 128 2 (10) $120 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 23—Retirement Plans (Continued) Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions from Prior Acquisitions (Continued) The following table sets forth the change in the benefit obligation and plan assets as of December 31: 2012 2011 (dollars in thousands) Change in Benefit Obligation Benefit obligation at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Service cost Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amendments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Actuarial gain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,892 0 75 0 269 (250) Benefit obligation at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,986 Change in Plan Assets Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Actual return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Employer contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fair value of plan assets at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Funded Status at End of Year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unrecognized transition obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unrecognized net gain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 250 (250) 0 1,986 0 212 $1,897 0 86 0 210 (301) 1,892 0 0 301 (301) 0 1,892 (2) 513 Amounts recognized in retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,198 $2,403 As of December 31, the funded status of the plan is: 2012 2011 (dollars in thousands) Amounts Recognized in the Statement of Financial Condition as Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,986 $1,892 The following table sets forth the amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income that have not yet been recognized as components of net periodic benefit costs as of December 31: Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax: Net (gain) loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transition obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(138) 0 $(138) $(333) 1 $(332) $(502) 2 $(500) 2012 2011 2010 (dollars in thousands) Weighted-average assumptions used to determine the benefit obligation as of December 31 are as follows: Weighted-average Assumptions Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Health care cost trend: Initial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Health care cost trend: Ultimate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Year ultimate reached . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.31% 7.00% 4.75% 2022 4.22% 8.00% 4.75% 2016 4.71% 9.00% 4.75% 2016 2012 2011 2010 110 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 23—Retirement Plans (Continued) Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions from Prior Acquisitions (Continued) Weighted-average assumptions used to determine the net benefit costs as of December 31 are as follows: Weighted Average Assumptions for Net Periodic Cost Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Health care cost trend: Initial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Health care cost trend: Ultimate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Year ultimate reached . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Corridor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Recognition period for gains and losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.71% 4.71% 4.22% 9.00% 10.00% 8.00% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% 2016 2016 2016 10.00% 10.00% 10.00% 12.7 12.00 12.7 2012 2011 2010 The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the “Act”) introduced a prescription drug benefit under Medicare Part D and a federal subsidy to sponsors of retiree health care benefit plans that provide a prescription drug benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D. The postretirement plans of First Commonwealth are provided through insurance coverage; therefore, First Commonwealth will not receive a direct federal subsidy. The preceding measures of the accumulated postretirement benefit cost assume that First Commonwealth will not receive the subsidy due to the relatively small number of retirees. The health care cost trend rate assumption can have a significant impact on the amounts reported for this plan. A one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects: Effect on total of service and interest cost components . . . . . . . . . . Effect on postretirement benefit obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $65 2 $(59) (2) As of December 31, 2012, the projected benefit payments for the next ten years are as follows: One-Percentage- Point Increase One-Percentage- Point Decrease (dollars in thousands) 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2018 - 2022 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Projected Benefit Payments (dollars in thousands) $219 213 206 200 193 671 The projected payments were calculated using the same assumptions as those used to calculate the benefit obligations included in this note. The estimated costs that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic cost for 2013 are as follows (dollars in thousands): Net gain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transition obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Postretirement Benefits (dollars in thousands) $(7) 0 $(7) 111 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 24—Unearned ESOP Shares During 2012, all employees with at least one year of service were eligible to participate in the ESOP. Contributions to the plan are determined by the Board of Directors and are based upon a prescribed percentage of the annual compensation of all participants. The ESOP acquired shares of First Commonwealth’s common stock in a transaction whereby the ESOP Trust borrowed funds that were guaranteed by First Commonwealth. The borrowed amounts represented leveraged and unallocated shares, and accordingly were recorded as long-term debt with the offset as a reduction of common shareholders’ equity. The borrowing had a balance of $1.6 million at December 31, 2011 and matured in November of 2012. All the remaining shares held as collateral for the loan were released and allocated to participants when the borrowing was repaid. Compensation costs related to the plan were $733 thousand, $717 thousand and $783 thousand in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. As of December 31, 2012, First Commonwealth terminated the ESOP and appropriate forms have been filed with the IRS in order to receive a determination letter. The following is an analysis of ESOP shares held in suspense and the fair value of those shares as of December 31: Shares in suspense, beginning of the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shares allocated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shares acquired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shares in suspense, end of the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2012 2011 2010 104,661 (104,661) 0 0 (dollars in thousands) 237,106 (132,445) 0 104,661 375,925 (138,819) 0 237,106 Fair market value of shares in suspense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0 $ 550 $ 1,679 Interest paid on the ESOP loan and dividends received on unallocated shares for the year ended December 31 were: 2012 2011 2010 Interest paid on ESOP loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividends on unallocated shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (dollars in thousands) $38 32 $66 22 $13 19 Dividends on unallocated shares were used for debt service while all dividends on allocated shares were allocated or paid to the participants. Note 25—Incentive Compensation Plan On January 20, 2009, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted with shareholder approval, the First Commonwealth Financial Corporation Incentive Compensation Plan. This plan allows for shares of common stock to be issued to employees, directors, and consultants of the Company and its subsidiaries as an incentive to aid in the financial success of the Company. The shares can be issued as options, stock appreciation rights, performance share or unit awards, dividend or dividend equivalent rights, stock awards, restricted stock awards, or other annual incentive awards. Up to 5,000,000 shares of stock can be awarded under this plan, of which, 4,507,841 shares are still eligible for awards. Restricted Stock The following provides detail on the restricted stock awards which were issued in 2012 and 2011 in order to retain and attract key employees. The grant date fair value of the restricted stock awards is equal to the price of the Corporation’s common stock on grant date. 112 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 25—Incentive Compensation Plan (Continued) Restricted Stock (Continued) On February 24, 2012, we issued 34,000 shares of our common stock to executive officers as part of our Long- Term Incentive Plan adopted by the Company as part of the Incentive Compensation Plan. The shares were issued pursuant to a Restricted Stock Agreement dated February 24, 2012 with a fair value of $5.96 per share based on the closing price of our common stock on the grant date. The restricted stock fully vests on December 31, 2014. On February 24, 2012, we issued 90,000 shares of our common stock to certain employees as part of our Annual Incentive Plan adopted by the Company as part of the Incentive Compensation Plan. The shares were issued pursuant to a Restricted Stock Agreement dated February 24, 2012 with a fair value of $5.96 per share based on the closing price of our common stock on the grant date. The restricted stock fully vests at the end of a two year period on February 24, 2015. On January 1, 2012, we issued 100,000 shares of our common stock to an executive of the Bank as an inducement to his employment which was issued under the Incentive Compensation Plan adopted by the Company. The shares were issued pursuant to a Restricted Stock Agreement dated January 1, 2012. The restricted stock was determined to have a fair value of $5.26 per share and was based on the closing price of our common stock on the grant date. The restricted stock fully vests equally over a four year period ending January 1, 2016. On November 21, 2011, we issued 10,000 shares of our common stock to an executive of the Company as an inducement for her employment which was issued under the Incentive Compensation Plan adopted by the Company. The shares were issued pursuant to a Restricted Stock Agreement dated November 21, 2011. The restricted stock was determined to have a fair value of $4.41 per share and was based on the closing price of our common stock on the grant date. The restricted stock fully vests at the end of a three year period on November 21, 2014. On April 1, 2011, we issued 25,000 shares of our common stock to an executive of the Bank as an inducement to his employment which was issued under the Incentive Compensation Plan adopted by the Company. The shares were issued pursuant to a Restricted Stock Agreement dated April 1, 2011. The restricted stock was determined to have a fair value of $6.82 per share and was based on the closing price of our common stock on the grant date. The restricted stock fully vests at the end of a five year period on April 1, 2016. On January 22, 2010, we issued 30,120 shares of our common stock to an executive of the Company as an inducement for his employment which was issued under the Incentive Compensation Plan adopted by the Company. The shares were issued pursuant to a Restricted Stock Agreement dated January 22, 2010. The restricted stock was determined to have a fair value of $5.70 per share and was based on the closing price of our common stock on the grant date. The restricted stock vested equally over a two year period ending January 22, 2012. On April 1, 2008, we issued 12,654 shares of our common stock to an executive of the Bank as an inducement for his continued employment and not under any stock incentive plan adopted by the Company. The shares were issued pursuant to a Restricted Stock Agreement dated April 1, 2008. The restricted stock was determined to have a fair value of $12.35 per share and was based on the closing price of our common stock on the grant date. The restricted stock vested equally over a three year period ending April 1, 2011. 113 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 25—Incentive Compensation Plan (Continued) Restricted Stock (Continued) On November 12, 2007, we issued 35,000 shares of our common stock to an executive of the Bank as an inducement for his employment and not under any stock incentive plan adopted by the Company. The shares were issued pursuant to a Restricted Stock Agreement dated October 19, 2007. The restricted stock was determined to have a fair value of $10.95 per share and was based on the closing price of our common stock on the grant date. The restricted stock vested equally over a three year period, and the final vesting occurred on November 12, 2010. Compensation expense related to restricted stock was $395 thousand, $249 thousand and $244 thousand in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. As of December 31, 2012, there was $1.6 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock awards granted. A summary of the status of First Commonwealth’s unvested service-based restricted stock awards as of December 31 and changes for the years ended on those dates is presented below: 2012 2011 2010 Outstanding, beginning of the year . . . . . . . . . Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shares 50,060 224,000 (17,060) (4,000) Outstanding, end of the year . . . . . . . . . . 253,000 Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value $6.00 5.65 5.73 5.96 5.71 Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value $6.52 6.13 7.16 0.00 6.00 Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value $11.53 5.70 11.32 0.00 Shares 20,103 30,120 (15,885) 0 34,338 6.52 Shares 34,338 35,000 (19,278) 0 50,060 On January 17, 2011, the Board of Directors approved the 2011—2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan stipulates restricted stock awards based on future performance of the Company over a three-year performance period. If performance thresholds are met, participants will receive 40% of the target award; if performance targets are met, participants will receive 100% of the target award; if performance targets are exceeded at a superior level, participants will receive 200% of the target award. If the performance thresholds are not achieved, participants will not receive an award. If awards are received, the restricted shares will vest over a one-year period after the performance period, with final vesting occurring on January 17, 2014. On February 24, 2012, the Board of Directors approved the 2012—2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan stipulates restricted stock awards based on future performance of the Company over a three-year performance period. If performance thresholds are met, participants will receive 40% of the target award; if performance targets are met, participants will receive 100% of the target award; if performance targets are exceeded at a superior level, participants will receive 200% of the target award. If the performance thresholds are not achieved, participants will not receive an award. If awards are received, the restricted shares will vest over a one-year period after the performance period, with final vesting occurring on December 31, 2015. 114 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 25—Incentive Compensation Plan (Continued) Restricted Stock (Continued) The following table summarizes the unvested target awards for the Plans as of December 31: 2012 2011 Outstanding, beginning of the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shares 93,333 74,000 0 (16,000) Outstanding, end of the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151,333 Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value $7.03 5.96 0.00 6.63 6.55 Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value $0.00 7.03 0.00 7.03 7.03 Shares 0 126,000 0 (32,667) 93,333 Stock Option Plan First Commonwealth’s stock based compensation plan expired on October 15, 2005, and is described below. All of the exercise prices and related number of shares have been adjusted to reflect historical stock splits. The plan permitted the Executive Compensation Committee to grant options for up to 4.5 million shares of First Commonwealth’s common stock through October 15, 2005. The vesting requirements and terms of options granted were at the discretion of the Executive Compensation Committee. Options granted in 2005 vested in the year granted. All options expire ten years from the grant date. All equity compensation plans were approved by security holders. A summary of the status of First Commonwealth’s outstanding stock options as of December 31 and changes for the years ended on those dates is presented below: Outstanding, beginning of the year . . . . . . . . . . Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2012 2011 2010 Weighted Average Exercise Price $10.03 0.00 6.76 10.68 Weighted Average Exercise Price $10.05 0.00 5.29 10.61 Weighted Average Exercise Price $10.18 0.00 0.00 11.19 Shares 728,552 0 0 (87,686) Shares 640,866 0 (13,760) (130,243) Shares 496,863 0 (130,672) (169,869) Balance, end of the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 196,322 11.64 496,863 10.03 640,866 10.05 Exercisable at the end of the year . . . . . . . . . . . 196,322 11.64 496,863 10.03 640,866 10.05 The intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $1.41 per share and $1.17 per share, respectively. There were no options exercised during the year ended December 31, 2010. 115 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 25—Incentive Compensation Plan (Continued) Stock Option Plan (Continued) The following table summarizes information about the stock options outstanding at December 31, 2012: Options Outstanding Options Exercisable Range of Exercise Prices Weighted Average Remaining Contract Life Number Outstanding $9.00 - $9.99 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $10.00 - $10.99 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $12.00 - $15.00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50,087 4,954 141,281 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 196,322 0.4 0.9 0.3 0.3 Weighted Average Exercise Price $ 9.27 10.46 12.52 Number Exercisable 50,087 4,954 141,281 Weighted Average Exercise Price $ 9.27 10.46 12.52 11.64 196,322 11.64 Note 26—Contingent Liabilities Legal proceedings McGrogan v. First Commonwealth Bank is a class action that was filed on January 12, 2009, in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. The action alleges that First Commonwealth Bank (the “Bank”) promised class members a minimum interest rate of 8% on its IRA Market Rate Savings Account for as long as the class members kept their money on deposit in the IRA account. The class asserts that the Bank committed fraud, breached its modified contract with the class members, and violated the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practice and Consumer Protection Law when it resigned as custodian of the IRA Market Rate Savings Accounts in 2008 and offered the class members a roll-over IRA account with a 3.5% interest rate. At that time, there were 237 account holders with an average age of 64, and the aggregate balances in the IRA Market Rate Savings accounts totaled approximately $11.5 million. Plaintiffs seek monetary damages for the alleged breach of contract, punitive damages for the alleged fraud and Unfair Trade Practice and Consumer Protection Law violations and attorney’s fees. On July 27, 2011, the court granted class certification as to the breach of modified contract claim and denied class certification as to the fraud and Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practice and Consumer Protection Law claims. The breach of contract claim is predicated upon a letter sent to customers in 1998 which reversed an earlier decision by the Bank to reduce the rate paid on the accounts. The letter stated, in relevant part, “This letter will serve as notification that a decision has been made to re-establish the rate on your account to eight percent (8%). This rate will be retroactive to your most recent maturity date and will continue going forward on deposits presently in the account and on annual additions.” On August 30, 2012, the Court entered an order granting the Bank’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing the class action claims. The Court found that the Bank retained the right to resign as custodian of the accounts and that the act of resigning as custodian and closing the accounts did not breach the terms of the underlying IRA contract. The Plaintiffs have filed an appeal with the Pennsylvania Superior Court. Other matters There are no other material legal proceedings to which First Commonwealth or its subsidiaries are a party, or of which their property is the subject, except proceedings which arise in the normal course of business and, in the opinion of management, will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated operations or financial position of First Commonwealth or its subsidiaries. 116 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 27—Related Party Transactions Some of First Commonwealth’s directors, executive officers, principal shareholders and their related interests had transactions with the subsidiary bank in the ordinary course of business. All deposit and loan transactions were made on substantially the same terms, such as collateral and interest rates, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions. In the opinion of management, these transactions do not involve more than the normal risk of collectibility nor do they present other unfavorable features. It is anticipated that further such transactions will be made in the future. The following is an analysis of loans to related parties (dollars in thousands): Balance December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Advances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Repayments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 551 5,663 (5,557) 1,076 Balance December 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,733 The “Other” line primarily reflects increases due to changes in the individuals designated as a “related party” during the year. Note 28—Regulatory Restrictions and Capital Adequacy The amount of funds available to the parent from its subsidiary bank is limited by restrictions imposed on all financial institutions by banking regulators. The dividend restrictions have not had, and are not expected to have, a significant impact on First Commonwealth’s ability to meet its cash obligations. Cash dividends declared per common share were $0.18 for 2012 and $0.12 for 2011. First Commonwealth is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on First Commonwealth’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, First Commonwealth and its banking subsidiary must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of First Commonwealth’s assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. First Commonwealth’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weighting and other factors. Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require First Commonwealth to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of Total and Tier I capital (common and certain other “core” equity capital) to risk weighted assets, and of Tier I capital to average assets. As of December 31, 2012, First Commonwealth and its banking subsidiary met all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject. 117 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 28—Regulatory Restrictions and Capital Adequacy (Continued) As of December 31, 2012, First Commonwealth Bank was considered well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be considered well capitalized, the bank must maintain minimum Total risk-based capital, Tier I risk-based capital and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the table below: Actual Regulatory Minumum Well Capitalized Regulatory Guidelines Capital Amount Ratio Capital Amount Ratio Capital Amount Ratio (dollars in thousands) As of December 31, 2012 Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets First Commonwealth Financial Corporation . . $708,583 14.53% $390,173 8.00% First Commonwealth Bank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 669,131 13.75 389,421 8.00 Teir I Capital to Risk Weighted Assets First Commonwealth Financial Corporation . . $647,460 13.28% $195,087 4.00% First Commonwealth Bank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 608,176 12.49 194,710 4.00 Tier I Capital to Average Assets First Commonwealth Financial Corporation . . $647,460 11.24% $230,322 4.00% First Commonwealth Bank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 608,176 10.64 228,544 4.00 As of December 31, 2011 Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets First Commonwealth Financial Corporation . . $720,307 14.71% $391,709 8.00% First Commonwealth Bank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 689,333 14.13 390,172 8.00 Teir I Capital to Risk Weighted Assets First Commonwealth Financial Corporation . . $659,083 13.46% $195,855 4.00% First Commonwealth Bank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 628,346 12.88 195,086 4.00 Tier I Capital to Average Assets First Commonwealth Financial Corporation . . $659,083 11.91% $221,444 4.00% First Commonwealth Bank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 628,346 11.44 219,627 4.00 N/A N/A $486,776 10.00% N/A N/A $292,066 6.00% N/A N/A $285,680 5.00% N/A N/A $487,715 10.00% N/A N/A $292,629 6.00% N/A N/A $274,534 5.00% Note 29—Capital On June 19, 2012 First Commonwealth announced a $50.0 million common stock repurchase program. As of December 31, 2012, First Commonwealth has purchased 5,662,083 shares at an average price of $6.62 per share. In the third quarter of 2010, the Company completed a public offering of 18,543,750 shares of its common stock at an offering price of $4.65 per share, raising additional capital of $86.2 million. In connection with the stock offering approximately $4.8 million worth of costs were capitalized resulting in net proceeds of $81.4 million. The Company amended its Dividend Reinvestment Plan (“DRIP”) during the second quarter of 2009 to provide the flexibility to raise capital by selling up to 5,000,000 shares of common stock through the DRIP. These shares may be sold pursuant to routine reinvested dividends, as well as optional cash purchases. During 2012 and 2011, there were no shares issued under this program. During 2010, 1,116,810 shares were issued under this program, 745,912 of which were related to the reissuance of Treasury Shares, raising $6.7 million in capital. During 2009, 97,905 shares were issued under this program, all of which were related to the reissuance of Treasury Shares, raising $0.4 million in capital. 118 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 30—Condensed Financial Information of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation (parent company only) Statements of Financial Condition Assets December 31, 2012 2011 (dollars in thousands) Cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loans to affiliated parties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Investment in subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Investment in unconsolidated subsidiary trusts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Investment in jointly-owned company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Premises and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Recievable from subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividends receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 19,493 30 736,165 3,291 8,347 9,347 1,583 1,205 76,715 $ 6,376 34 751,702 3,291 8,007 14,196 2,545 0 85,833 Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $856,176 $871,984 Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity Accrued expenses and other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loans payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Subordinated debentures payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4,419 0 105,750 746,007 $ 6,091 1,600 105,750 758,543 Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $856,176 $871,984 Statements of Operations 2012 2011 2010 Interest and dividends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividends from subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ (dollars in thousands) 1 $ 64,342 (5,711) 12,581 (19,061) 1 10,321 (5,605) 30,595 (44,057) 1 3,190 (5,658) 28,789 (42,786) Income (loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Applicable income tax benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52,152 4,364 Income (loss) before equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries . . . . . Equity in undistributed (loss) earnings of subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56,516 (14,562) (8,745) 6,618 (2,127) 17,401 (16,464) 6,790 (9,674) 32,652 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 41,954 $ 15,274 $ 22,978 119 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 30—Condensed Financial Information of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation (parent company only) (Continued) Statements of Cash Flow Operating Activities 2012 2011 2010 (dollars in thousands) Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating $ 41,954 $ 15,274 $ 22,978 activities: Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net gain on sales of assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Increase) decrease in prepaid income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Undistributed equity in subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,719 (107) (3,044) 14,562 8,789 3,730 (1,069) 0 (17,401) 1,649 3,658 (3) 23 (32,652) 9,029 Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65,873 2,183 3,033 Investing Activities Net change in loans to affiliated parties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Purchases of premises and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from sale of other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Additional investment in subsidiary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 (3,005) 4,309 0 5 (5,736) 1,461 0 7 (3,026) 15 (70,000) Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,308 (4,270) (73,004) Financing Activities Proceeds from issuance of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Discount on dividend reinvestment plan purchases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from reissuance of treasury stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Purchase of treasury stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock option tax benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 (92) (18,759) 1,028 (36,242) 1 144 (63) (12,558) 72 (9) 6 83,913 (33) (5,306) 4,248 (9) 0 Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (54,064) (12,408) 82,813 Net increase (decrease) in cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,117 6,376 (14,495) 20,871 12,842 8,029 Cash at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 19,493 $ 6,376 $ 20,871 Cash dividends declared per common share were $0.18 for 2012, $0.12 for 2011 and $0.6 for 2010. During 2004, the ESOP obtained a $14.0 million line of credit from an unrelated financial institution. The line of credit was used to purchase stock in 2005 for the ESOP and is guaranteed by First Commonwealth. During 2005, $8.5 million was borrowed on the line. There were no borrowings on the line during 2012, 2011 and 2010. The loan was recorded as long-term debt and the offset was recorded as a reduction of common shareholders’ equity. The final payment on the ESOP was made in November 2012 eliminating the outstanding debt. See Note 24 “Unearned ESOP Shares.” First Commonwealth Financial Corporation has an unsecured $15.0 million line of credit with another financial institution. There are no amounts outstanding on this line as of December 31, 2012. As of December 31, 2012, we are in compliance with all debt covenants related to the line of credit. 120 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 31—Subsequent Event On January 29, 2013, an additional share repurchase program was authorized for up to $25.0 million in shares of the Company’s common stock. Under this program, management is authorized to repurchase shares through Rule 10b5-1 plans, open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, block purchases or otherwise in accordance with applicable federal securities laws, including Rule 10b-18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Depending on market conditions and other factors, repurchases may be made at any time or from time to time, without prior notice. First Commonwealth may suspend or discontinue the program at any time. Additionally, in January 2013, the Company announced the redemption of approximately $32.5 million in issued and outstanding 9.50% mandatorily redeemable capital securities issued by First Commonwealth Capital Trust I. First Commonwealth expects to complete the redemption of these securities during the second quarter of 2013. 121 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Continued) Quarterly Summary of Financial Data—Unaudited The unaudited quarterly results of operations for the years ended December 31 are as follows: Fourth Quarter Third Quarter Second Quarter First Quarter 2012 Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Net interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for credit losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net interest income after provision for credit losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net impairment losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net securities gains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other noninterest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Basic Earnings Per Share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted Earnings Per Share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average shares outstanding assuming $ $ (dollars in thousands, except per share data) $ $ $ 53,880 7,230 54,712 7,794 53,867 6,676 47,191 5,706 41,485 0 29 14,074 43,842 11,746 3,011 8,735 0.09 0.09 101,777,594 46,650 6,754 39,896 0 163 17,692 44,765 12,986 3,139 9,847 0.09 0.09 104,080,025 $ $ 46,918 4,297 42,621 0 0 16,096 41,848 16,869 4,548 12,321 0.12 0.12 104,894,261 $ $ $ $ 56,616 8,446 48,170 3,787 44,383 0 0 17,380 46,752 15,011 3,960 11,051 0.11 0.11 104,810,727 dilution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101,787,103 104,098,383 104,901,239 104,816,442 Fourth Quarter Third Quarter Second Quarter First Quarter 2011 Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for credit losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net interest income after provision for credit losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net impairment losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net securities gains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other noninterest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Loss) income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . Income tax (benefit) provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net (Loss) Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Basic (Loss) Earnings Per Share . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted (Loss) Earnings Per Share . . . . . . . . . . Average shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average shares outstanding assuming dilution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ (dollars in thousands, except per share data) $ $ $ 56,487 8,854 47,633 25,912(a) 57,600 10,120 47,480 6,975 57,989 11,104 46,885 9,112 21,721 0 0 15,478 48,576 (11,377) (5,660) (5,717) (0.05) (0.05) 104,765,492 40,505 0 0 10,799 41,121 10,183 1,857 8,326 0.08 0.08 104,728,915 $ $ $ $ 37,773 0 1,608 15,456 45,700 9,137 1,718 7,419 0.07 0.07 104,686,072 $ $ 59,469 11,600 47,869 13,817 34,052 0 577 13,751 41,429 6,951 1,705 5,246 0.05 0.05 104,618,499 104,765,492 104,728,915 104,686,072 104,623,518 (a) The increase in the provision for credit losses during the fourth quarter can be attributed to revised collateral valuations on nine impaired commercial loan relationships, primarily secured by commercial real estate, the transfer of three loan relationships to held-for-sale and the restructuring of two commercial loans. 122 ITEM 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure None. ITEM 9A. Controls and Procedures We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in applicable rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, also conducted an evaluation of our internal controls over financial reporting to determine whether any changes occurred during the fourth fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting. No such changes were identified in connection with this evaluation. ITEM 9B. Other Information None. 123 PART III ITEM 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance Information called for by this item concerning the identification, business experience and qualifications of First Commonwealth’s directors will be included in First Commonwealth’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the annual meeting of shareholders to be held April 23, 2013 (the “Proxy Statement”), under the heading “Proposal 1—Election of Directors,” and is incorporated herein by reference. Information called for by this item concerning First Commonwealth’s compliance with section 16(a) of the Exchange Act will be included in the Proxy Statement under the heading “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” and is incorporated herein by reference. First Commonwealth has adopted a code of conduct and ethics that applies to all employees of the Company, including executive officers. In addition, First Commonwealth has adopted a code of ethics for the Chief Executive Officer and all senior financial officers of the Company. Both of these codes are filed as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and are posted on First Commonwealth’s website at http://www.fcbanking.com. Refer to Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a list of exhibits. There have been no material changes to the procedures by which security holders of First Commonwealth may recommend nominees to First Commonwealth’s Board of Directors since First Commonwealth last disclosed those procedures in its definitive Proxy Statement in connection with the 2013 annual meeting of shareholders. Information called for by this item concerning First Commonwealth’s Audit Committee and the identification of “Audit Committee financial experts” will be included in the Proxy Statement under the heading “Corporate Governance,” and is incorporated herein by reference. Certain information regarding executive officers is included under the caption “Executive Officers of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation” after Part I, Item 4, of this Report. ITEM 11. Executive Compensation Information called for by this item concerning compensation of First Commonwealth’s executive officers and the report of the Compensation and Human Resources Committee will be included in the Proxy Statement under the heading “Executive Compensation,” and is incorporated herein by reference. Information called for by this item concerning compensation of First Commonwealth’s directors will be included in the Proxy Statement under the heading “Compensation of Directors,” and is incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters Information called for by this item concerning security ownership of certain beneficial owners and security ownership of management will be included in the Proxy Statement under the headings “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners” and “Securities Owned by Directors and Management,” and is incorporated herein by reference. 124 ITEM 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters (Continued) The following table provides information related to our existing equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2012: Plan Category (1) Equity compensation plans approved by security holders . . . . . Equity compensation plans not approved by security Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans 141,281 $12.52 4,507,841 holders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N/A Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141,281 N/A $12.52 N/A 4,507,841 (1) The table does not include information on stock options issued by First Commonwealth in substitution for stock options of GA Financial, Inc. and Pittsburgh Financial Corporation upon the acquisition of those companies. At December 31, 2012, 55,041 shares of common stock are issuable upon exercise of substitute stock options issued in connection with those acquisitions with a weighted average exercise price of $9.38. First Commonwealth cannot grant additional stock options or other equity awards under the GA Financial or Pittsburgh Financial equity compensation plans. ITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence Information called for by this item concerning transactions with related persons and review, approval or ratification of transactions with related persons will be included in the Proxy Statement under the heading “Related Party Transactions,” and is incorporated herein by reference. Information called for by this item concerning director independence will be included in the Proxy Statement under the heading “Corporate Governance,” and is incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services Information called for by this item concerning fees paid to First Commonwealth’s principal accountant and First Commonwealth’s pre-approval policies and procedures will be included in the Proxy Statement under the heading “Annual Audit Information,” and is incorporated herein by reference. 125 3.1 3.2 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 PART IV ITEM 15. Exhibits, Financial Statements and Schedules (A) Documents Filed as Part of this Report (1) Financial Statements All financial statements of the registrant as set forth under Item 8 of the Report on Form 10-K. (2) Financial Statement Schedules Schedule Number Description I II Indebtedness to Related Parties Guarantees of Securities of Other Issuers Page N/A N/A (3) Exhibits Exhibit Number Description Incorporated by Reference to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation Exhibit 3.1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 Amended and Restated By-Laws of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation Exhibit 3.1 to the current report as Form 8-K filed January 20, 2011 Amended and Restated Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan (formerly known as the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan) Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated January 1, 2012 entered into among First Commonwealth Financial Corporation, First Commonwealth Bank and T. Michael Price Change of Control Agreement dated December 30, 2011 entered into between FCFC and T. Michael Price First Commonwealth Financial Corporation Incentive Compensation Plan 10.5 2012 Annual Incentive Plan 10.6 2011-2013 Long Term Incentive Plan 10.7 2012-2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan Exhibit 10.2 to the annual report on Form 10-K filed March 5, 2012 Exhibit 10.1 to the current report on Form 8-K filed January 5, 2012 Exhibit 10.3 to the current report on Form 8-K filed January 5, 2012 Annex I to Proxy Statement filed March 16, 2009 relating to the 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders Exhibit 10.4 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed May 8, 2012 Exhibit 10.2 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2011 Exhibit 10.5 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed May 8, 2012 10.8 10.9 Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for service- based restricted stock Exhibit 10.3 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed May 8, 2012 Employment Agreement dated January 22, 2010 entered into between FCFC and Robert E. Rout Exhibit 10.1 to the current report on Form 8-K filed January 28, 2010 10.10 Change of Control Agreement dated December 30, 2011 entered into between FCFC and Robert E. Rout Exhibit 10.4 to the current report on Form 8-K filed January 5, 2012 126 ITEM 15. Exhibits, Financial Statements and Schedules (Continued) Exhibit Number Description 10.11 Change of Control Agreement dated December 30, 2011 entered into between FCFC and I. Robert Emmerich 10.12 Change of Control Agreement dated December 30, 2011 entered into between FCFC and Leonard V. Lombardi 10.13 Change of Control Agreement dated December 30, 2011 entered into between FCFC and Matthew C. Tomb Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the annual report on Form 10-K filed March 5, 2012 Exhibit 10.13 to the annual report on Form 10-K filed March 5, 2012 Exhibit 10.14 to the annual report on Form 10-K filed March 5, 2012 10.14 Restricted Stock Agreement dated April 1, 2011 entered into between FCFC and I. Robert Emmerich Exhibit 10.15 to the annual report on Form 10-K filed March 5, 2012 10.15 Agreement and General Release dated July 8, 2012 entered into between First Commonwealth Financial Corporation and Sue A. McMurdy. Exhibit 10.1 to the current report on Form 8-K filed July 12, 2012 10.16 Amended and Restated Director Retainer Plan Filed herewith 21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant Filed herewith 23.1 Consent of KPMG LLP Independent Registered Filed herewith Public Accounting Firm 31.1 Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to Filed herewith Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 31.2 Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Filed herewith 32.1 Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to Filed herewith Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 32.2 Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Filed herewith 101 Interactive Data File (XBRL) Furnished herewith 127 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in Indiana, Pennsylvania. FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION (Registrant) By: /S/ T. MICHAEL PRICE T. Michael Price President and Chief Executive Officer Dated: March 13, 2013 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been executed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. Signature Capacity Date /S/ JULIE A. CAPONI Julie A. Caponi /S/ RAY T. CHARLEY Ray T. Charley /S/ GARY R. CLAUS Gary R. Claus Director Director Director March 13, 2013 March 13, 2013 March 13, 2013 /S/ DAVID S. DAHLMANN Director, Chairman March 13, 2013 David S. Dahlmann /S/ JOHNSTON A. GLASS Johnston A. Glass /S/ JON L. GORNEY Jon L. Gorney Director Director March 13, 2013 March 13, 2013 /S/ DAVID W. GREENFIELD Director March 13, 2013 David W. Greenfield /S/ LUKE A. LATIMER Luke A. Latimer /S/ JAMES W. NEWILL James W. Newill /S/ T. MICHAEL PRICE T. Michael Price /S/ ROBERT E. ROUT Robert E. Rout /S/ LAURIE S. SINGER Laurie S. Singer Director Director President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer March 13, 2013 March 13, 2013 March 13, 2013 March 13, 2013 Director March 13, 2013 /S/ ROBERT J. VENTURA Director March 13, 2013 Robert J. Ventura 128 Exhibit 21.1 Subsidiaries of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation Percent Ownership By Registrant First Commonwealth Bank 601 Philadelphia Street Indiana, PA 15701 Incorporated under the laws of Pennsylvania Subsidiaries of First Commonwealth Bank: First Commonwealth Insurance Agency 601 Philadelphia Street Indiana, PA 15701 Incorporated under the laws of Pennsylvania First Commonwealth Preferred, LLC 1105 N. Market Street, Suite 1300 Wilmington, DE 19801 Incorporated under the laws of Delaware First Commonwealth Community Development Corporation (Inactive) 654 Philadelphia Street Indiana, PA 15701 Incorporated under the laws of Pennsylvania First Commonwealth Financial Advisors Incorporated 601 Philadelphia Street Indiana, PA 15701 Incorporated under the laws of Pennsylvania FraMal Holdings Corporation 1105 North Market Street, Suite 1300 Wilmington, DE 19899 Incorporated under the laws of Delaware First Commonwealth Capital Trust I 601 Philadelphia Street Indiana, PA 15701 Incorporated under the laws of Delaware First Commonwealth Capital Trust II 601 Philadelphia Street Indiana, PA 15701 Incorporated under the laws of Delaware First Commonwealth Capital Trust III 601 Philadelphia Street Indiana, PA 15701 Incorporated under the laws of Delaware Commonwealth Trust Credit Life Insurance Company 2700 North Third Street, Suite 3050 Phoenix, AZ 85004 Incorporated under the laws of Arizona 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% Exhibit 23.1 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation: We consent to the incorporation by reference in: • Registration statement No. 333-165848 on Form S-3 of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation’s Shelf Registration of Common Stock; • Registration statement No. 333-154751 on Form S-3 of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation’s Shelf Registration of Common Stock; • Registration statement No. 333-111732 on Form S-3 of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation’s Stock Purchase and Dividend Reinvestment Plan; • Registration statement No. 333-113534 on Form S-8 of GA Financial, Inc. Stock Option Plan; • Registration statement No. 333-111735 on Form S-8 of Pittsburgh Financial Corp. Stock Option Plan; • Registration statement No. 033-55687 on Form S-8 of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation’s Stock Option Plan; and • Registration statement No. 333-159090 on Form S-8 of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation’s Incentive Compensation Plan. of our reports dated March 13, 2013, with respect to the consolidated statements of financial condition of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2012, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, which reports appear in the December 31, 2012 annual report on Form 10-K of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania March 13, 2013 /s/ KPMG LLP EXHIBIT 31.1 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, T. Michael Price certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. March 13, 2013 Date /s/ T. Michael Price Signature President and Chief Executive Officer Title EXHIBIT 31.2 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Robert E. Rout certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. March 13, 2013 Date /s/ Robert E. Rout Signature Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Title EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADDED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, T. Michael Price, President and Chief Executive Officer of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation (“First Commonwealth”), certify that the Annual Report of First Commonwealth on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2012, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of First Commonwealth at the end of such period and the results of operations of First Commonwealth for such period. DATED: March 13, 2013 /s/ T. Michael Price T. Michael Price President and Chief Executive Officer EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADDED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Robert E. Rout, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation (“First Commonwealth”), certify that the Annual Report of First Commonwealth on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2012, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of First Commonwealth at the end of such period and the results of operations of First Commonwealth for such period. DATED: March 13, 2013 /s/ Robert E. Rout Robert E. Rout Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Shareholder Information Annual Meeting The Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be held at: First Commonwealth Place 654 Philadelphia Street, Indiana, PA on Tuesday, April 23, 2013, beginning at 3:00 p.m., Eastern Time. Common Stock First Commonwealth Financial Corporation common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and is traded under the symbol FCF. Current market prices for First Commonwealth Financial Corporation common stock can be obtained from your local stock broker or by calling the Corporation at 724-349-7220 or 1-800-711-2265. Transfer Agent Computershare P.O. Box 43006 Providence, RI 02940-3006 Telephone: 1-866-203-5173 www.computershare.com/investor Dividend Payments Subject to the approval of the Board of Directors, quarterly cash dividends are paid in the months of February, May, August and November. Dividend Reinvestment First Commonwealth Financial Corporation’s direct stock purchase and dividend reinvestment plan offers shareholders an opportunity to reinvest their dividends in additional shares of the Corporation’s common stock. Once enrolled in the plan, participants may also purchase shares through voluntary cash investments. For more information on the plan, please visit www.computershare.com/investor or contact Computershare at 1-866-203-5173. Direct Deposit of Dividends For information about direct deposit of dividends to your U.S. bank account at no charge to you, please visit www.computershare.com/investor or contact Computershare at 1-866-203-5173. Investor/Shareholder Inquiries Requests for information or assistance regarding investor/shareholder inquiries should be directed to the Corporation at 724-349-7220 or 1-800-711-2265 or InvestorRelations@fcbanking.com. Annual Report 2012 First Commonwealth Financial Corporation 601 Philadelphia Street Indiana, Pennsylvania 15701-0400 (724) 349.7220 (800) 711.BANK (2265) fcbanking.com 

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above